ZE-78-83•
..-ra7•174, _ ...
SPaHANL (aunty COURT HOUSE
December 16, 1983
Gentlemen:
11 4E;(011INTUrr
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6HGADWAY CENTRE 6UILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
PHONE 456 -2205
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
TO: Board of Spokane County Commissioners
FROM: QSteve P. Horobiowski, Zoning Administrator
SUBJECT: Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of December 8, 1983.
On December 8, 1983, the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee met at 9:00 A.M. to
consider six new zone reclassification applications and two change of conditions
applications. Members present: Mr. Skalstad, Chairman; Mrs. Myers, and
Mr. Williams.
Following are the applications in sequence and the action taken by the Committee.
If not appealed, these decisions will become final on December 27, 1983. All
Findings and Order for this hearing were signed on December 15, 1983.
1) ZE- 205A -79, Change of Conditions in the Restricted Industrial Zone: Gmeiner
Location: Generally located south and adjacent to Interstate 90 and
140 feet west of Ella Road in Section 18- 25 -44.
Proposal: To delete requirement for Sight - Obscuring Fence along the
northerly and southerly property lines.
Action: Approval. (Vote: 3 - 0 ). The applicant indicated that he
is willing to provide additional landscaping to provide
further screening from adjoining property and the Freeway
(I -90). He is also willing to extend the sight- obscuring fence
partially along the southern property line to screen the site
from residential views along Ella Road.
2) ZE -78 -83 Local Business to Commercial: Erickson
Location: Generally located at the northeast corner of Sprague Avenue
and Sunderland Road in Section 17- 25 -44.
Proposal: Probable Retail - No Specific Site Plan.
Action: Approval. ( Vote: 3 - 0 )
(contd.)
AGENDA, DECEMBER 8, 1983 TELEPHONE NO.: 456 -2205
SPOKANE COUNTY'ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor
North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, WA 99260
ZONING APPLICATIONS WILL BE HEARD IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER. THE ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COM-
MITTEE WILL RECESS FROM 12:00 NOON TO 1:30 P.M. FOR LUNCH AT A PLACE TO BE ANNOUNCED. ITEMS
NOT HEARD PRIOR TO THE 5:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT, WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT AVAILABLE DATE
AS ANNOUNCED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE.
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR THESE PROJECTS ARE ON FILE AND AVAILABLE IN THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S OFFICE.
9:00 A.M.
ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS
54 ,'
1. ZE- 205A -79 CHANGE OF CONDITIONS IN THE RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL ZONE
(Generally located south and adjacent to Interstate 90 and
140 feet west of Ella Road in Section 18- 25 -44.)
L
Comprehensive Plan:
Proposal:
Site Size:
Owner /Applicant:
' 2E- 78-831 LOCAL BUSINESS TO COMMERCIAL
(Generally located at the northeast corner of Sprague Avenue
and Sunderland Road in Section 17- 25 -44.)
Comprehensive Plan:
Proposed Use:
Site Size:
Owner /Applicant:
3. ZE -86 -83 LOCAL BUSINESS TO COMMERCIAL
(Generally located west and adjacent to Mullan Road, approxi-
mately 300 feet north of Mullan Road and Valley Way in
Section 17- 25 -44.)
Comprehensive Plan:
Proposed Use:
Site Size:
Owner /Applicant:
Urban
To delete requirement for Sight - Obscuring
Fence along the northerly and southerly
property lines.
Approximately 1.8 Acres
DAN F. GMEINER
North 1303 Ella Road
Spokane, WA 99206
Major Commercial
Probable Retail - No Specific Site Plan
Approximately 24,300 Square Feet
WILLIAM W. ERICKSON
c/o Denny Horlacher
American West Realty, Inc.
West 901 Broadway Avenue
Spokane, WA 99201
Major Commercial
Recycling Cen
, m Square Feet
REDEEMER LUTHERAN CHURCH
c/o Ron Kusler
New Hope Training Center
North 421 Mullan Road, Spokane, WA 99206
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee on
December 8, 1983, and the members of the Committee present being
Richard L. Skalstad, Chairman, Jane E. Myers and Jerry Williams.
B. PROPOSAL
The sponsor, William W. Erickson, is requesting approval of a zone
reclassification, File No. ZE- 78 -83, Local Business to Commercial, for the
purpose of developing retail uses (No Specific Site Plan).
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -78 -83
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, apartments,
commercial, offices and vacant.
2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for
Major Commercial development.
3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application
is Local Business.
4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy
Act) have been complied with, and the Committee concurs with the
Declaration of Non - Significance.
5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda
Item have been fulfilled.
6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses
within the proposed Zone Classification.
7. That the applicant has demonstrated that conditions have
substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and
accordingly, the proposed rezone is justified.
8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area.
C. FINDINGS OF FACT (continued)
r
9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the
proposed use.
10. The Hearing Examiner Comittee finds the proposed use to be in
harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise
detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare.
11. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the
Hearing Examiner Committee:
a) That the site should be developed with adequate landscaping
treatment around the proposed building, adjoining the County
roads, with special emphasis along the north property line
adjoining the multi - family development. However, the site has
limitations related to size, location, and other County
requirements (such as '208' designs, drainfield location, and
access points), that prohibit the advanced planning of landscape
areas prior to preparation of a detailed site plan. It is felt
that the applicant should coordinate with the Planning
Department staff and other County departments to combine all
design standards into a detailed site plan that will provide as
much green space and deciduous, trees as feasible on the site.
b) That development of the site should protect the adjoining
multi - family development to the north from adverse impacts.
Buffering of the site, along the north property line, should
include fencing, landscaping, and restrictions on vehicle access
to the northerly end of the site. Review of the buffering
techniques should be administrative.
D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -78 -83
1. The Zoning Administrator shall approve a specific exterior
lighting plan for the approved area prior to installation of
such lighting. (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination
to the area with full consideration to adjacent properties).
2. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and
signing plan for the described property prior to the release of
any building permits.
3. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for
maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning
Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the
project prior to release of building permits.
2
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -78 -83
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued)
4. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not
extend over the property boundary.
5. The specific development plan will be submitted for Planning
Department review and approval prior to issuance of building
permits.
6. All current standards of the Commercial Zone, as amended, shall,
be complied with in the development of this site.
7. A 6 -foot sight- obscuring fence to be the same elevation as the
existing fence on the nokrtherly boundary, shall be provided
along the northern boundary of this proposal to provide a buffer
for the existing residential use located immediately north of
this site.
8. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning
stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff.
9. The applicant shall comply with RCW 58 -17 and the Spokane
County Platting Ordinances prior to issuance of building
permits.
10. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to
Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County
Commissioners Resolution #77 -1392 be initiated by the project
applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this
application, and prior to any on -site improvements, or file
appropriate documents to the effect that the NOTICE OF ACTION is
waived in accordance with Spokane County Commissioners'
Resolution #82 -0458 dated May 4, 1982.
11. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA
GUIDELINES (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental
Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance has
been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the
official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain
information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse
impacts to the physical environment; a finding is hereby made
that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the
physical environment are anticipated as a result of the project;
and a final declaration of non - significance is hereby to be
issued.
3
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -78 -83
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued)
12. The northern portion of the site, adjacent to the multi - family
development, shall be restricted from public parking and be
limited to service vehicle traffic for the building. There
shall be no through traffic allowed between the north property
line and the building, from the eastern side of the site to
Sunderland Road.
13. Landscaping of the site shall be based on a cooperative design,,
incorporating generous amounts of green space and deciduous
trees into requirements for '208' drainage control, drainfield
location, and access points. Special attention shall be given
to the northern property line to provide a landscape buffer
along with the required sight- obscuring fence. Other areas to
be considered for landscaping are adjacent to Sunderland Road,
Sprague Avenue, and around the building. Review of the site
plan shall be administrative.
1. Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit:
2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the Spokane County Engineer.
3. (A) Other specific improvements: Applicant shall construct
Spokane County Standard Portland Cement concrete sidewalk along
Sunderland Road.
4. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance
of a building permit on the property.
5. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed
combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal
plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any
building permit on the property.
6. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted
and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the
issuance of a building permit on the property. The design,
location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving
or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be
required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied
or traveled by vehicles.
7. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the
property, his heirs, assigns, and successors.
4
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued)
8. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
9. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge
Construction, and other applicable County standards and /or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater'
Management in effect at the date of construction, unless
otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
10. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County
Commissioners'Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended.
c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No.
80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby
authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance
with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health
District and is further conditioned and subject to specific
application approval and issuance of permits by the Health
District.
2. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the
County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of
a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the
petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to
object by the signing of a protest petition against the
formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter
36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this
condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from
objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of
improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a
ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter
36.94.
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in
accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane
County, as amended.
4. The unit shall be double - plumbed for connection to future
areawide collection systems.
5. Plans and specifications for the double plumbing are to be
reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department prior to
constructing a septic tank and drainfield system.
5
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -78 -83
1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall
be approved by the County Engineer and the Health District prior
to the issuance of any building permit for this project.
2. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
3. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits
bythe Health Officer, the proposal is authorized the use of an
individual on -site sewage system.
4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
5. Water service shall be %by an existing public water supply when
approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of
Social and Health Services.
6. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently
prohibited.
e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
1. The site is located in Fire District # 1.
2. Mains and fire hydrants will be required to be installed in
accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County
Department of Building and Safety.
f) WATER PURVEYOR
1. Water Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company, and they will
supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and
irrigation uses.
6
E. ORDER
ATTEST:
For WALLIS D. HUBBARD
Planni g Director
By SAVE HOROBIOWSKI
Zoning Administrator
Date: CC /5/7g
7
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -78 -83
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that
the application of William W. Erickson, for a zone reclassification as
described in the application should be APPROVED.
Motion by: Myers Seconded by: Williams
Vote: Unanimous to Approve to the COMMERCIAL ZONE ( 3 - 0 )
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE
FINDINGS; gRDER, VOT
Ve
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
Date: 9 -26 -83
Application No: ZIT i N
Name of Applicant: AMERICAN WEST REALTY. INC.
Street Address of Applicant: West 901 Broadway
City: Spokane State: WA Zip Code: 99201 Tele. No. 328.3866
Name Of Property Owner(s): WILLIAM W. ERICKSON
Authorized Agent representing Owner
(if other than owner): DENNY HORLACHER,
Existing Zoning Classification: Local Business
Date Existing Zone Classification Established:
Existing Use of Property: Vacant Land - No Use
Proposed Zone Classification: Commercial
Proposed Use of Property: Unknown (Probable Retail Use)
Legal Description of Property:
Opportunity, PT of Block 144, N180 Ft of 8230 Pt of E1/2
Exclucinq Highway
Section: 17
Township:
25
Source of Legal: County Assessors office
Assessor's Parcel No: (See tax statement) 17543 -1719
Property Size: 24,300 Frontage: 135 Feet on: Sprague
Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: None
Street Address of the Property: N.E.C. Sprague and Sunderland.
If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your
interest in it? Agent for Seller
Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property:
Previous zone change to Local Business.
property to commercial.
of the adjoining properties.
AMERICAN WEST REALTY, INC,
Range:
44
- 2E 5/ - - 7y
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED:
1. What are the changed conditions of the site area, which you feel make this
proposal warranted? The high traffic flow on Sprague and increased retail
activity in the University City area has changed the highest use of the
2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent
properties? When development is completed it will raise the value
Rev. 2/3/81
HrrLll ION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION -- continued -2
11 "This tion of the application will provide the Planning Department's Staff :with
f'writter. verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the
agencies identified. Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporat-
ed in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department.
1. COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE
p 5 -
" (Signatu
2. COUNTY UTILITIES OFFICE
A preliminary consultation has been held
requirements for submittal of this proposal
designated water rvgyor for this site
3.
a)
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
re.uiremen Or submit 9I of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
ure
WATER PURVEYOR (NAME)
The proposal (is) (is not) located within
area.
b) Satisfactory arrangements (have) (have
proposal.
c)
(Date)
to discuss the proposal. Our
for rezo a have be satisfied.
is
9 -2‘ -B3
(Date)
the boundary of our service
not) been made to serve this
We (are) (are not) able to serve this site with adequate water.
(Signature) (Date)
4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
This proposal is located in Fire District # 1
3
( Signature LAND vtictNT No Y*o ofl.p 8uuv1W4. Da ng Fcuo, T. et oETttMIN[ I.11it
A FRoFo gp 6Ulww4' 15 Te Pg. cala ow SITE. AIL corn TO Se MSC kr TIME of POILMIT
5. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT AvFuCrUfN(ela-rnng, wvoaArrts ►LJAmEIN6)
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The
The
applicant has been informed of our requirements and standards.
(Signature)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE
ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY
LEDGE.
1 FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER
POSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR,
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM
ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHALF.
NOTARY SEAL:
(Signed)
(Address)
NOTARY
(Date)
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT
PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE
AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW-
OF RECORD OF THE SITE PRO -
IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY
Date:
Phone:
Zip:
Date:
Date:
Rev. 2/3/81
A.
PROPOSAL
OWNER
ENGINEER
D. SPECIPIC CONDI
Fee Paid:
Planning A
E. FINAL PLAT CHE
Fee Paid: Dat
Ma
Ad
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y E N G I N E E R
- - - P R E L I M I N A R Y C O N S U L T A T I O N--
-L69
Project Name: ZookSe_ eh coo ne.
Number of Parcels:
Section 1 7 T. 2 S N., R. 4y E.W.M.; Quarter 1 2 3 4
DEVELOPER Name: D (AoQtALhe2 . ANNeta.icPAl t1:TEX F�eA. \t
or Address:
AGENT Phone: Business Home ,3aft ' 36(Q E_
Name:
Address:
Phone: Business
Name:
Address:
Phone: Business
a e l a 44
B. PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION: Date: �/ / a [.� /� 3 By: 1V`
Stunt' eatnad
Preliminary a) Right -of -Way MO ic ;(4 paoo gam- /w/
Conditions b) Curb /Op u r
c) Sidewalk ye.,
d) Pave Z`r •t ee ii
e) Approaches Veat't - r ; Qecru 12E4
f) Drainage 207s lyelip
g) State /City Review Yes ¶ ) No ( )
Remarks: 1;?ubIuc /) 2) n' at Jt a o tie 4- 'cI 1A?rQ �.lArt�st
NOTE: This proposal must comply with Spokane County Regulations for Roads, Ap-
proach and Drainage in New Construction; Board of County Commissioners Resolution
No. 80 -1592 as amended. Conditions are preliminary and may change after field in-
spection and review of County records.
C. INSPECTION Date: / / By:
Remarks:
WILI.IAM W. 1SIuI :KSON
1. N 9324 DIVISION 489•438S
SPOKANE, WA 99218
r
r
P
` ' ` wv Y t l� 11l(- l ,:.r.,,() C SR
R THE t \ \ 11''1 \ rr kJ L ' 1 -
OR U 1 • ._ �' Sf ! 1 1 \y-i ""''- 1.
`a 1 �� +' � �.I -.S' p f �� . -1 �_— yard --I_ ,
DOLLARS :
I
OIVB country Homes Branch
Ow National Bank Spottane, Washington 9S20a /( / �
111 il l FOR
I: L 25 L0003 L L 271.063nitol 0753
. .a
__ - -- �— ddOUO
�� M33H3
O�L66 NOIONIHSYM NtlHO —{ — Hs43
_ 4Qsa3uaL.LIsN -- - - - -- --
H33NION3 AINI100 3NMIOd$ mdAnoH
Home
Home
p Q
Nutuber ZE ' 79
(7.2f$ s-1o1104 1 J`r
u_ — — — ssaappd!
,1:)4C7 III N.) " +` ' .r1 WOJ3 pania)ab
61 _9 k a .: ; � atop IdI3D321
753
28- 3/1251
Oft -
.. —
er 1
33NVIV0
OIVd PAP/
VN1053V
AO LWV -
INOODDV
.APPL r ATION #:
ZONE CLASSIFICATION: LOCAL BUSINESS to COMMERCIAL
C ROPOSED7fINAL
1. Proponent:
Contact Person:
2. County Action(s) Requested: Approval
site from Local Business to Commercial.
Review and Comment
If you wish to comment in writing as provided in WAC '197-10-340 (5), please
respond in light of the following information, noting particularly the due date
for written comments.
Proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance issued: November 15, 1983
Dept:
Date:
5.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
ZE -78 -83
T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M I N A T I O N
Written response accepted until:
A public hearing is scheduled for:
DECLARATION OF
AMERICAN WEST REALTY, INC.
Denny Horlacher 509/328 -3866
of a zone reclassification
(ZE- 78 -83)
December 2, 1983
December 8, 1983
NONSIGNIFICANCE
on a 24,300 sq.ft.
Contact:
Planning
November 15, 1983
Spokane County Planning Department
North 721 Jefferson Street
Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456 -2205
ATTN: Steve P. Horobiowski
PROPOSED DECLARATION: FINAL DECLARATION:
Name: STEVE / HOROBIOWSKI Name:
Signature: ` Signature:
Title: Zoning Administrator
MAILING LIST
Title: Chairman
Dept: Hearing Examiner
Date:
(30.) WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
(31.) WA State Department of Ecology (Spokane)
(47.) WA State Dept. of Social & Health Services
(57.) Spokane County Health District
( ) School District
( ) Fire District #1
( ) Water District - Modern Electric Water Co.
(68.) Office of the Mayor (City of Spokane)
(54.) Spokane County Boundary Review Board
(69.) Spokane City Plan Commission
(44.) WA State Parks & Recreation Comm. (Olympia)
(43.) WA State Dept. of Natural Resources (Colville)
(38.) WA State Dept. of Game (Spokane)
(16.) U. S. HOusing & Urban Development (Spokane)
(53.) Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
(49.) WA Stale Dept. of Transportation (Spokane)
(11.) Fairchild Air Force Base Commander's Office
(116.) Spokane International Airport, ATTN: Airports Director
(145.) Town of Airway Heights
(146.) City of Cheney
(147.) City of Deer Park
(150.) Town of Medical Lake
(151.) Town of Millwood
(152.) '208' Water Quality
Committee
SP<o GIG- Lta . .. .
'ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
FILE #: ZE -78 -83
SEC /TWN /RNG: 17/25/44
Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local
governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private
proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions
significantly (and "adversely ", as per WAC 197 -10) affecting the quality of the physical environment. The
purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether Or not a proposal is such a
major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to
you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result.
The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the degree of impact, asking you
for more information, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe
an explanation would be helpful to government decision- makers, include your explanation in the space provided,
or use additional pages, if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you
are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will
help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnec-
essary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently
applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which' will be
caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the
future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review
now, without duplicating paperwork in the future.
No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate
County department. State law requires explanations for every "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist.
The person completing the form may be required to provide explanation for "no" answers, and in some cases,
more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination.
NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for
various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question
does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question.
I. BACKGROUND
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Name of Proponent: AMERICAN WEST REALTY, INC. Phone Number: 328 - 3866
2. Address of Proponent: West 901 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99201
3. Date Checklist Submitted: .S!D c -r /443
4.- Agency Requiring Checklist: Spokane County A >4 �!
5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: ,2, Ytt . C ,dCa- /ZK .ni/M-4,1 >4 r a7
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design
elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
A level tract of land with 135 ft fronting Sprague Avenue and 180 ft
fronting Sunderland equaling 24,300 sq. ft. There is no definite use at
this time.
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the Proposal, as well as the extent of the land
area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate
understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): Site is located at
Northeast Corner of Sprague Avenue and Sunderland. (Any buildings erected
would conform to all county set -back requirements).
8. Estimated Date for Completion of Proposal: Unknown
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state, and
local - including rezones): Spokane County Zone Chancre to Commercial
10a. Do you, or the owner in the event you do not own the subject land, have any plans for future additions,
expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
None except initial building construction.
August, 1981
1
10b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's location? If yes, explain:
No
2
11. Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the property covered by your
proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain:- No
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has.been
completed, but is expected to befiled at some future date, describe the nature of such application
form: None
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures?
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil ?. . .
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? x
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or
physical features? X
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion or soils, either on or off the site ? X
(f) Changes in deposition of erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation,
deposition or erasion which may modify the channel of a river or stream
or the ( bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? _ _ X
Explanation( aThere will be some displacement of soil required for construction
of improvements. It will have minimal impact. Any paving & landscaping will reduce
wind erosion.
2. Air. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? X
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in
climate, either locally or regionally? _ _ X •
Explanation. The generation of additional vehicular uses could have some impact
on ambient air quality; however, this impact would be minimal.
3. Water. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No
(a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters? • X
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface water runoff? X
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in.any water body?
(e) Discharge into surface water, or in any alteration of surface water
quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct
injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates,
detergents,waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances
into the ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
2
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Explanation: All parking and driveway areas paved in accordance with
Design Standards for Control of Storm Water Runoff "208 Program."
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of
flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora, and
aquatic plants)?
X _
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered
species of flora? X
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a
barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species?
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X
Explanationc`A)The entire site is now covered by weeds. Any development
would include landscaping.
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or number of any species
of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? x
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered
species of fauna?
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result
in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat?
Explanation:
Explanation:
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
Explanation::
3
X
X
x
X
X
6. Noise. Yes Maybe No
(a) Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X
Explanation: Additional vehicular use will increase existing noise level
minimal impact.
7. Light and Glare. Yes Maybe No
(a) Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X
Explanation: Sian and low level around lighting will have minimal impact.
8. Land Use. Yes Maybe No
(a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area? X
Yes Maybe No
X
Explanation:
Explanation:
Explanation:
the public services checked above.
4
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the Yes Maybe No
release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or X
upset conditions?
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, Yes Maybe No
or growth rate of the human population of an area?
x
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for Yes Maybe No
additional housing?
X
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement
of people and /or goods? x
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? _ _ X
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists, or pedestrians? X
Explanation:
Any development will attract a small amount of additional vehicular
movement to the site. This will create a demand for off — street parking.
Adequate off— street parking will be provided. Q t o (it -C ;o 027 6._ t3 /a
•j s, ;.ca tl /.J „— L, IJ..vti ,\ c.:�a}}..{�a c�19(a ma ? t rl S o txcc' acccr.P.o t'C3
14. Public Services. Will the pb rbposal havr an effect upon, or result Yei' Maybe No
in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection? X
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
(f) Other governmental services?
Explanation:
The eventual addition of a commercial structure will require
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of energy?
Explanation: Slight increase in the use of electricity.
4
X
x
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems.
or alterations to the following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas? X
(b) Communication systems? x
(c) Water? x
(d) Sewer or septic tanks? - X
(e) Storm water drainage? x
(f) Solid waste and disposal? X
Explanation: A commercial structure would require a moderate increase in the
above services.
Yes Maybe No
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazards
or potential health hazard (including mental health)? _ x
Explanation:
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or
view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an
.aesthetically offensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
Yes Maybe No
19. Recreation: Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational opportunities? x
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a
significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building?
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
C.
Revised: August, 1981
I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made '
truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any will-
ful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may with-
draw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue in r iance upon this checklist.
j/j1/4.55---/c13 Datj1/4.55---/c13 Proponent: /:'7 ,2 ck . .
(Please Print or Type)
Proponent: American West Realty, Inc. Address: West 901 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99201
Phone: 328 -3866
Person completing form: DENNY HORLACHER
5
Phone:
328 -3866
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist:( 1 (04'.��L(N.v.02 .rc; -E_
Yes Maybe No
Yes Maybe No
Yes Maybe No
X
Date:
X
Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff:
A. )( Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recommends /issues
a proposed declaration of nonsignificance.
B. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommends /issues a
final declaration of significance.
Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the
nature of the proposal, recommends /issues a final declaration of nonsignificance. '
TO: Spokane County Planning Department
FROM: County Engineer's Department eel
SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval-Zone Change -- Number: z 4F___7_ - 83___ _________
Applicant's Name E,2is,kSQLt —.
Section /7 Township a &N, Rang 9M_EWM
OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER .
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
The following "conditions of approval" for the above- referenced zone change are submitted to
the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee for Inclusion in the staff analysis and
"findings and order" of the hearing scheduled PeceyLhetL8198•
Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit
1. Applicant shall dedicate feet on
for right -of -way prior to - any use of the property.
2. Applicant shall dedicate feet on
for right -of -way and slop e easements as necessary prior to any use of the property.
3. Applicant shall dedicate a foot radius on
and prior to any use of the property.
4. Applicant shall dedicate feet on and a foot radius on
and fur right -of -way prior to any use of the property.
O Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
Spokane County Engineer.
6. Access permits and improvements to must be approved
by the Washington Department of Transportation.
7. Access permits and improvements to
by the City of
(a) Applicant shall improve _ _ _____ in a manner consistent with Spokane
County TYPICAL roadway section No.__ ___ ` minimum paving width
(b) Applicant shall improve in a manner consistent with Spokane
County TYPICAL roadway section No. minimum paving width .
1
(c) Applicant shall improve in a manner consistent with Spokane
County TYPICAL roadway section No. minimum paving width
(d) Applicant shall improve in a- manner consistent with Spokane
County TYPICAL roadway Section No. _minimum paving width_
(e) Other specific improvements: A Jic4,KT.__ /_ &o.Vs*4cT S pe-awe
_C __ stR. gsl_ - J ? QI z r t ci_-C,sscr__Co ets__. �
nip sc t 5Mridie2I.QKLI_._ 0q N_..__
J(arlaa9 c__ /B_. 19 A 3
must be approved
® Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage, and
. access plans prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property.
10 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane
County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water
disposal plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any building permit on the
property. '
OVER.
11 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the
Spokane County Engineer prior .to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The
design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shalt be in accordance with standard
traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer,
will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by
vehicles.
12 The word "applicant" shall
0 include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs,
assigns, and successors.
13. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of
the County Engineer, join in and he a willing participant In any petition or resolution
which purpose Is the Formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement
pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the ;cost of
these improvements.
14. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvement stated herein, the appli-
cant may, w1th the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements
stated herein by joining and participating In a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent
of the required road improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of
these improvements.
15 The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall he accomplished as ap-
proved by the Spokane County Engineer.
16
All required improvements shall conform to the current State Of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable county standards
and or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in
effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
17. Applicant shall file a petition for the vacation of prior to
any use of the property.
18. Applicant shall construct a paved and delineated access approach(s) to meet the existing
pavement on
19. Access to Road shall he prohibited until such time as specifically
authorized by the Spokane County Engineer.
Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution Nn. 80 -1592 as amended.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DECEMBER 8, 1983
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT: AMERICAN WEST REALTY, INC.
c/o Denny Horlacher
PROPERTY OWNER: William W. Erickson
REQUESTED ZONING: Commercial
EXISTING ZONING: Local Business (established in 1974)
PROPOSED USE: No Specific Site Plan
EXISTING USE: Vacant
SITE SIZE: Approximately 24,300 Square Feet
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Major Commercial
PRIORITY SEWER SERVICE AREA: Yes AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA: Yes
PROJECT LOCATION: This site is generally located at the northeast
corner of Sprague Avenue and Sunderland Road in Section 17- 25 -44.
II. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
STAFF REPORT
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -78 -83
1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: This site as well as both sides of Sprague
Avenue, in a 1,000 foot wide band, are designated as Major
Commercial. A rezone to Commercial would be in keeping with this
designation.
/0
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -78 -83
II. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (continued)
2) ZONING: North Multiple Family Suburban, Est. 1939 & 1969
East Local Business, Established, 1975
West Residential Office, Established, 1969
South Commercial, Established, 1957
3) LAND USE: Site Vacant
North Apartments, Duplexes, and Single Family
East Retail
South Offices and Restaurant
West Offices
4) HISTORY OF LAND USE ACTIONS: Most rezone activity along the south
side of Sprague Avenue occurred in the 1940's and 50's. On the north
side, the activity has been relatively recent; mainly during the
1970's. The rezones to the east and west of this site have been
primarily to Residential Office and Local Business.
The site itself was zoned from Residential Office to Local Business
in 1974. Conditions of approval at that time are similar to these
that would be imposed today. One unusual condition called for a
6 -foot high grape stake fence with an 8 -foot gate along the north
property line. Easement access was to be granted over the site'to
the adjoining north property owner. Apparently the condition was
imposed at the urging of both the rezone applicant and the adjoining
property owner.
5) NEIGHBORHOOD CONSIDERATIONS: Sprague Avenue is currently four lanes
with optional turning lane. Sidewalks exist along the site on
Sprague Avenue. Sunderland Road is two lanes, paved, without further
improvements along the site boundary. Sunderland serves residential
uses generally north of the retail and office uses along Sprague
Avenue.
1/
III. SITE ANALYSIS
1) SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND CONSIDERATIONS: The site is flat and
undeveloped. It has possible access to both Sprague Avenue and
Sunderland Road. Existing multi - family uses adjoin the site on the;
north.
2) AGRICULTURAL SUMMARY: The Major Commercial designation of the
Comprehensive Plan is not intended to preserve productive
agricultural land.
3) SITE PLAN INFORMATION: No Specific Site Plan
IV. CONCLUSIONS
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -78 -83
BUFFERING TECHNIQUES: At a minimum, landscape treatments should be
required along Sprague Avenue, Sunderland Road, and the future
building. Additional landscaping may be required at administrative,
site plan review, depending on development specifics.
Buffering along the north property line would be appropriate as
protection to the existing multi- family property adjoining the site.
Suggested is a 10 -foot wide landscape screen with a 6 -foot high
sight- obscuring fence. This is considerably more than required in
the 1974 Local Business rezone due primarily to the wider selection
of high intensity uses that would be permitted on a Commercially
zoned site.
OTHER SITE PLAN CONSIDERATIONS: Specific access points should be
reviewed and approved by Engineering and Planning at the
administrative level.
The Commercial rezone of the site is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan and follows the trend of similar rezones along Sprague Avenue.
Compliance with Commercial Zone standards and all recommended conditions
should insure appropriate site development. Detailed site plan review
should be performed at the administrative level.
!ct
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -78 -83
V. RECOMMENDED AGENCY CONDITIONS, IF APPROVED:
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The Zoning Administrator shall approve a specific exterior
lighting plan for the approved area prior to installation of
such lighting. (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination
to the area with full consideration to adjacent properties).
2. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and
signing plan for the described property prior to the release of
any building permits.
3. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for
maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning
Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the
project prior to release of building permits.
4. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not
extend over the property boundary.
5. The specific development plan will be submitted for Planning
Department review and approval prior to issuance of building
permits.
6. All current standards of the Commercial Zone, as amended, shall
be complied with in the development of this site.
76 be 6407e &W417ov as ausT
7. A 6 -foot sight- obscuring fence and en TO LJoDtq
stfri b e p r rn h
ovided alo the no a ^indary of this proposal
to provide a buffer for the existing residential use located
immediately north of this site.
8. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning
stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff.
9. The applicant shall comply with RCW 58 -17 and the Spokane
County Platting Ordinances prior to issuance of building
permits.
10. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to
Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County
Commissioners Resolution #77 -1392 be initiated by the project
applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this
application, and prior to any on -site improvements, or file
appropriate documents to the effect that the NOTICE OF ACTION is
waived in accordance with Spokane County Commissioners'
Resolution #82 -0458 dated May 4, 1982.
f3
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -78 -83
a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued)
11. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA
Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental
Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance has
been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the
official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain
information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse
impacts to the physical environment; a finding is hereby made
that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the
physical environment are anticipated as a result of the project;
and a final declaration of non - significance is hereby to be
issued.
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1. Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit:
2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the Spokane County Engineer.
3. (A) Other specific improvements: Applicant shall construct 1
Spokane County Standard Portland Cement concrete sidewalk along
Sunderland Road.
4. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance
of a building permit on the property.
5. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed
combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal
plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any
building permit on the property.
6. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted
and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the
issuance of a building permit on the property. The design,
location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving
or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be
required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied
or traveled by vehicles.
7. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the
property, his heirs, assigns, and successors.
Fyn
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued)
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -78 -83
7. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
8. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge
Construction, and other applicable County standards and /or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater
Management in effect at the date of construction, unless
otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
9. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County
Commissioners'Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended.
c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No.
80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby
authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance
with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health
District and is further conditioned and subject to specific
application approval and issuance of permits by the Health
District.
2. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the
County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of
a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the
petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to
object by the signing of a protest petition against the
formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter
36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this
condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from
objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of
improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a
ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter
36.94.
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in
accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane
County, as amended.
4. The unit shall be double - plumbed for connection to future
areawide collection systems.
5. Plans and specifications for the double plumbing are to be
reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department prior to
constructing a septic tank and drainfield system.
died
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -78 -83
1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall
be approved by the County Engineer and the Health District prior
to the issuance of any building permit for this project.
2. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
3. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits
bythe Health Officer, the proposal is authorized the use of an
individual on -site sewage system.
4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when
approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of
Social and Health Services.
6. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently
prohibited.
e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
1. The site is located in Fire District # 1.
2. Mains and fire hydrants will be required to be installed in
accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County
Department of Building and Safety.
f) WATER PURVEYOR
1. Water Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company, and they will
supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and
irrigation uses.
DCCE11..t3G2 5 • 19 —
44 re C P.u7
De-NNt µ onla cine'Q. - Ve �scAt ' Ow��czs cuho
o f �uiZG(nMSEE coral na - oAt lZe - zone.
2. Aewo \& 3ra?ktti 5 48 '4 Spe n c¢ 2 L - K`l0 O IJte •
3. W't\ P3ZOO l ' /a00 CUASb /nl9tcrt 172u57 - AEG Sp. 7,9/'rd C &4)G►2-,
y cke.VTh 1 4 s q 17 Ckerr1 — 41€-Q1c,v0
I6
Z.
o ?pos ; '0
O 2n Ebe2lew - kT39 -ec:Pk.e.Seh'T.'h✓7 orpos,' o,d
a (9 t o Pu M20 6 - j4't - /1/25 Sr . 10410 Wet e.W%'
Mss Qaopef2TLi Nocittit arf- bite sl tc,
kma le.a h e ci2i Vela- s Q l AN '(Z. eU i !?tu - 5 rimT 76i6li
P 20 pa 'ze' o-t me- 7 / 1 00 e4 e/se- Y , t3lei/G�/�/ T VS /
�-• 0°,1cu22 R6ciggc 40-t G xCAOAT0.v — R e4cti n i2
0, - ) L Th e toece *(
\� We b � 2v � REAR- 64
L W t� 1 e U aT i vrt J..) w ta2� . (LI U ri -4) ce
lJu ' en - � , r
C wA c to aAn. / �w4t- \ 1 c, i o�, moo- oe 2 1.44
Kcc 2oc 5 AOILi'j � 2 S
1 c . d�s�o/{a/2 R ss fr'°/' d Accrass
w B c y� Y'os ref eJt d
•�hw�a� 4 W it �iv9-GO
kAn9ctscgp,i• • a-r Nsta -cl ZQA-.
1 C`oar_ erg J ■\-,? s 1 1:1H s 42.. ACLU era IZ.4 Cs;ZE
�XKU m ino�: oh .
Tht1/4-1 i i(0 W. �;6•ot) '�b ahA �
_ - � V�1 � �3 1.Q4,\9414,142.4 — 66\e �'ts
3 � Q G,b G d•€,,Z- b-r-•d ( o 0 . l *
BOARD
CERTIFIED MAID
March 2';'1984
/ //i
Robert Mingo
North 98 Sunderland
Spokane, WA 99206
JOHN R. McBRIDE
First District
RE: ZE- 78 -83, Local Business to Commercial: Erickson
We have received your Memo dated 2/18/84, requesting that the above
referenced appeal be withdrawn. Enclosed is your check for
$75.00 which you deposited with your request for appeal.
OUNTY COMMISSIONERS
CLrRK OF THE BOARD
.7w
Enclosure
ON AGUE
cc: C. Raymond Eberle
/orifice - or:
COUNTY COMM/SS /ONERS ,
F. KEITH SHEPARD
Second District
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0100
GRANT C. PETERSON
Third District
z
RECEIVED
1b The Board of Canty Camdssioners FEB 2 7 1984
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
I withdraw my appeal dated ]2/22/83 on Zane Reclassification
# ZE -78 -83
Dated: 2/18/1984
Robert Mingo
Name: Robert Mingo
TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COtiUIISSIONERS
Appeal Fee s4 - / 7
A
pp - $75.00
Today's Date 12/22/83
(Please Print)
Address: North 98 Sunderland, Spokane, WA Zip Code: 99206
iitime Phone: 928 - 8888 Business Phone:
Hearing Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed
Title:
Preliminary Subdivision Number:
.,: Zone Reclassification Number:
ZE - 78 - 83
Date of Hearing Examiner Committee Action: December 8, 1983
Signature: ;4,fj7 7� c
CfRaymon berle
Signature of Authorized Representative: 1
Address: North 2610 Pines Road, Spokane, Washington 99206
YOUR REASONS FOR APPEAL
Appellant is the adioinina orooerty owner. Aotellant's orooerty is
multi- family. where the orooerty beina reauested to be reclassified
from local business to commericial is requested to be rezoned. There
is no site plan. Appellant is trying to protect his property from
adverse affects of the proposed zoning. The hearing examiner committee
action approved the zone change without providing adequate buffer zone
and imposing restrictions against use of property that would adversely
affect the appellant's property:
OFFICE USE ONLY
Copies to: Planning •72— Engineers - 2> Environmental Health /
Norma Smith
Fee Received: •Check 7 4 7 , ,, r, Cash Receipt Number 3 .S' S{
•
Bearing Date:.
*RECEIVED
DEC 2 91983
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
Name: Robert Mingo
(Please Print)
Address: North 98 Sunderland, Spokane, WA Zip Code: 99206
:iome Phone: 928 - 8888 Business Phone:
learing.Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed
Title:
Preliminary Subdivision Number:
• Zone Reclassification Number:
ZE -78 -83
Date of Hearing Examiner Committee Action: December 8, 1983
S ignature:
CflRaymong4berle
Signature of Authorized Representative: ��A 1
Address: North 2610 Pines Road, Spokane, Washington 99206
YOUR REASONS FOR APPEAL
Appellant is the adioinina orooerty owner. Appe]lant's Drnnerty is
multi - family. where the orooerty being requested to be reclassified
from local business to commericial is requested to be rezoned. There
is no site plan. Appellant is trying to protect his property from
"adverse affects of the proposed zoning. The hearing examiner committee
action approved the zone change without providing adequate buffer zone
and imposing restrictions against use of property that would adversely
affect the appellant's property.
TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COt1MISSIONERS
Appeal Fee - $75.00
OFFICE USE ONLY
Today's Date 12/22/83
Copies to: Planning '" Engineers - - Environmental Health /
Norma Smith
Fee Received: .Check 7 ,- , n Cash Receipt Number - 3 .g g ?_
RECEIVED - •
liearing Date:
DEC 2 9
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER