The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-86-83AGENDA, DECEMBER 8, 1983 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, WA 99260 9:00 A.M. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 2. ZE -78 -83 3. \ ZE -86 -831 Comprehensive Plan: Proposal: Site Size: Owner /Applicant: LOCAL BUSINESS TO COMMERCIAL Comprehensive Plan: Proposed Use: Site Size: Owner /Applicant: Comprehensive Plan: Proposed Use: Site Size: Owner /Applicant: TELEPHONE NO.: 456 -2205 ZONING APPLICATIONS WILL BE HEARD IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER. THE ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COM- MITTEE WILL RECESS FROM 12:00 NOON TO 1 :30 P.M. FOR LUNCH AT A PLACE TO BE ANNOUNCED. ITEMS NOT HEARD PRIOR TO THE 5:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT, WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT AVAILABLE DATE AS ANNOUNCED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR THESE PROJECTS ARE ON FILE AND AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S OFFICE. 1. ZE- 205A -79 CHANGE OF CONDITIONS IN THE RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL ZONE (Generally located south and adjacent to Interstate 90 and 140 feet west of Ella Road in Section 18- 25 -44.) Urban To delete requirement for Sight - Obscuring Fence along the northerly and southerly property lines. Approximately 1.8 Acres DAN F. GMEINER North 1303 Ella Road Spokane, WA 99206 (Generally located at the northeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Sunderland Road in Section 17- 25 -44.) Major Commercial Probable Retail - No Specific Site Plan Approximately 24,300 Square Feet WILLIAM W. ERICKSON c/o Denny Horlacher American West Realty, Inc. West 901 Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99201- LOCAL BUSINESS TO COMMERCIAL (Generally located west and adjacent to Mullan Road, approxi- mately 300 feet north of Mullan Road and Valley Way in Section 17- 25 -44.) Major Commercial Recycling Cen Approximately , tgrm Square Feet REDEEMER LUTHERAN CHURCH c/o Ron Kusler New Hope Training Center North 421 Mullan Road, Spokane, WA 99206 1 I . A. PROPOSAL /\ o h /cc( /e-r DEVELOPER or AGENT OWNER ENGINEER Remarks: Preliminary Conditions D. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: S P O K A N E C O U N T Y E N G I N E E R - - - P R E L I M I N A R Y C O N S U L T A T I O N-- Project Name: 4( FL ,) Number of Parcels: /17.r Section //f T. 7 < N., R. Name: /lp , Address: ti 4:24 Phone: Business Name. Address: Phone: Business Name: Address: Phone: Business a) Right -of -Way b) Curb c) Sidewalk d) Pave e) Approaches f) Drainage g) State /City Review C. INSPECTION Date: / / By: Remarks: B. PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION: Date: 9 / 3 Rj By: Yes ( ) No ( ) NOTE: This proposal must comply with Spokane County Regulations for Roads, Ap- proach and Drainage in New Construction; Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. Conditions are preliminary and may change after field in- spection and review of County records. Fee Paid: Yes No Amount $ Planning Application Signed: Date / / By: E. FINAL PLAT CHECKS Fee Paid: Date Amount Check Mathematical 6 Surveying Checks: No. 1 Date No. 2 Date No. 3 Date By By By Additional mathematical and Surveying Checks: No. 4 Date By No. 5 Date By No. 6 Date By No. 7 Date By Number ZL p g _j rain - C7 C/ 4 1 E.W.M.; Quarter 1 2 3)4 • C JLF 1 -n44_2? Home Home Home Cash Check Fee Amt.&Dt.Pd. Fee Amt..Dt.Pd. Fee Anil.&Dt.l'd. Fee Amt.SDt.Pd. Cash I /81 l ':a . APPLICANT'S NAME: Nand jto,fte ,-}Lei,7 „Z 11; SECT. /7 TWP 5 RGE.y7 ue ADDRESS: y„Z/ A/, / CONTACT PERSON: / t,u/,z CITY: 421 ZIP CODE: 9Y104 PHONE: /2k. D4 PROPERTY OWNER (NAME): ii;2L ar,.,.k:,Z „)//4/0414971 4�� ' 1. INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ZONE SUBMITTAL: PLEASE REFER TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROCEDURE -(C) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS PARCEL #: /73yS- dc5/9 EXISTING ZONE: X, e PROPOSED ZONE: ( All - LOCATION: L itnn fi .-c At ,` -.. .. / 44'1t Si 4 II COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY: / /1577707 SITE PLAN: R /V&A ADJACENT ZONING: N G ,g ADJACENT LAND USE: N IA('_ OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS: EASEMENTS: EA/ 4,C/ AFFECTED BY: AQUIFER � (d�S PSSA L� /� S SHORELINES Ala e v OVERLAY ZONE )I rcuY / ri ENVIRONMENTAL OR CULTURAL RESOURCES INFLUENCE AREAS UTILITIES: WATER POWER SEWAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT FIRE DISTRICT ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: BY: / / 0 /i'lr.'[c. fA PHONE: 509 / 456 - 2205 1/4/83 ZONE CHANGE CONFERENCE CHECKLIST (Return this Sheet with Application) PROPOSED USES: TOPOGRAPHY: ZONING SECTION FILE #: c ?L - KG: -S3 CONFERENCE DATE: cSrD7 �/ /gee l” SITE SIZE: /C n_ E V i7�J W 7 eaJ E CA,t'c 6_5 X /6 ,3 Q ISO Fe ce 77try i Ats... FEw/6E Sic* 1 T I A.�k Ir✓o S smoke CorvvC yeti. . C� To' PLOT PL A sI 3 /3L /•o Fr.vee s ic,✓ L=t Feme c 1 Ex1 st r✓a Coil RS G u'r Zf• 86.83 11 4 /Lag 0 c k 1I ■ ■ EX.stva Pita Poses. Zo.vr .✓G Srre Qw eF Boa.D. Cov. EX/ftN6 /s✓,LbrA/GS Pas Pose, 130.4o..vas NEit.,.(rrar Bye'. D .NG 44rd..y7eF birivewAr PA2k..✓a• .CAN, SCAOw e. Fevcc s VA / /EY WA y i / L. 8. 1» Conn». S-� / zoo s.s /vmNG Ave .✓E /fv A/E 8 ' TitA%te.2 8' Conveys& EX1sT.A/a .5 £PAC.Es Aro.✓E G Pe Z.ste y'x 70 fit ORDER OF TI• PAIL RECEIPT Dote I 7 Received From /1e: Address _ 4rt ACC NEW HOPE TRAINING CENTER NORTH 421 MULLAN ROAO SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 PHONE (509) 928-0423 /./VA 11:0 FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANK SPRAGUE-ARGONNE OFFICE DISHMAN. WA 99214 EXPLANAIION ‘ ? 6917 AMT OF --- --- — /TATANCE Aml PAID L DL DTJE _ ._ _[__. _ .._)_____ O: ( 'V NE, WASHINGTON 992W ACCOUNT CASH $POKANE COUNTY ENGINEER N. 811 JEFFERSON _. ip 8K808 InEck- ■ .- ..... .. ... 1 11.001. I, 2 t L 2 5 LO 574 LI: 70 3 108 LII• NEW HOPE Mr TRA G CENTER / Dollars $ 2 c-ko Q-c? 98-574 1251 4124 noLLARs c_ 022.0. '26 APf ,:ATION #: ZONE CLASSIFICATION: LOCAL BUSINESS to COMMERCIAL PROPO INAL DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE 1. Proponent: New Hope Training Center 509/928 -0423 Contact Person: Ron Kusler 509/928 -0423 2. County Action(s) Requested: Approval of a zone reclassification on a 9,100 sq.ft. site from Local Business to Commercial. (ZE-86 33: Review and Comment If you wish to comment in writing as provided in WAC 197 - 10-340 (5), please respond in light of the following information, noting particularly the due date for written comments. Proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance issued: November 15, 1983 Written response accepted until: December 2, 1983 Contact: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456 -2205 ATTN: Steve P. Horobiowski PROPOSED DECLARATION: FINAL DECLARATION: Name: STEVE HORO IOW l Si g nature: Title: Dept: Date: 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. IS T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M I N A T I O N A public hearing is scheduled for: Zoning Administrator Planning November 15, 1983 ZE -86 -83 MAILING LIST December 8, 1983 (30.) WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) (31 .) WA State Department of Ecology (Spokane) (47.) WA State Dept. of Social & Health Services (57.) Spokane County Health District ( ) School District ( ) Fire District #1 ( ) Water District - Modern Electric Water Co (68.) Office of the Mayor (City of Spokane) (54.) Spokane County Boundary Review Board (69.) Spokane City Plan Commission (44.) WA State Parks & Recreation Comm. (Olympia) (43.) WA State Dept. of Natural Resources (Colville) (38.) WA State Dept. of Game (Spokane) (16.) U. 5. HOusing & Urban Development (Spokane) (53.) Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority (49.) WA State Dept. of Transportation (Spokane) 17. (11.) Fairchild Air Force Base Commander's Office 18. (116.) Spokane International Airport, ATTN: Airports Director 19. (145.) Town of Airway Heights 20. (146.) City of Cheney 21. (147.) City of Deer Park 22. (150.) Town of Medical Lake 23. (151.) Town of Millwood ® (152.) '208' Water Quality Z11 -A RECEIVED NOV 161983 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Name: Signature: Title: Chairman Dept: Hearing Examiner Committee Date: l.U...0 COURT./ COURT nOuSC ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FILE #: Zit-42;423 SEC /TWN /RNG: / 7 - ?S / Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely ", as per WAC 197 -10) affecting the quality of the physical environment: The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the degree of impact, asking you for more information, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision - makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages, if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnec- essary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for every "lies" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required to provide explanation for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard fore being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: NF = i " . •l,z ; l . ..; ',.; C ; ; : J. Phone Number: 9 2. Address of Proponent: 1 4 / 14 //fir; e 3. Date Checklist Submitted: /0 'g 3 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: y44A44//J4 ,&r (caup/TY / A � 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: ZD/y CIMAkG 40601 41,01 j. )4; eloy 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of yit scope and nature): 4 - (� ti ,V /4b . ( j ',J Re,: e r falu,,,; C r s Si lr l,-\ _x - -P-C; ZZ , 3 if 0 oh LJ w., 4"c No '4 V,; Ll li S . t, ki IL. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the Proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): At' n b.. 1 lu.. I A b.r . GC ArA Art. cl ` .tt, E . 2 8. Estimated Date for Completion of Proposal: C:ci S ic,,t 3 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state, and local - including rezones): 1::, RC,. n 1r to a_ L; e,. r A 1�c•.._Q... -I� u��_ ,'.-; u. � (CL - 10a. Do you, or the otner in the event you do not expansion, or further activity related to or NO i- n+ F I .: S 4; v,..- Auoust. 1OR1 Lae e - _ 2 c fr i own the subject land, have any connected with this proposal? L,1 'J l ..ciA i 1 LNAt plans for future additions, If yes, explain: 10b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's location? If yes, explain: lc Sc•Lf)i ,S (leL •pr S •'ac - 1: L. Se ,- "1t- fl, S' is i t p l v , 4= •, - ,.a „< - 11. Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to befiled at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: • N; f L r n l -,.T .`. -L'v '],Gw \ ∎n •.1 v. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil?. . . (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion or soils, either on or off the site ? (f) Changes in deposition of erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion whichmay modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: (t ) w , I^ I he (moll pia -o „A o f g -: 4 '0J h. - ,1- - 11 /c n. < /D �7r � AISi la .AN �tij eau, 4p.' l g(in lJl M1IJ” (f 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: QpcAptrl4 0 0e4TLot( d4 l k44 JT a.l /4444.. P n144404. (d) Change in the amount of surface water in.any water hody? (e) Discharge into surface water, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but notlimited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (1) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? 2 Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No or any change in �� / TCeacfr/ iy 6441 N40 drr' X eS 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and a r amount of surface water runoff? eit (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? l� Yes Maybe No w Explanation: wXen ee%g a gge, eitt eauf-'9. — .saze_ c-A A Al ( t- G 10 4,4 tire . 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora, and aquatic plants)? Explanation: Explanation: 7eS rl. is SE6' AbedC '4l' 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: Yes Maybe No Los 14- (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (d) Reduction in acrea e of any ricultural crop? barrier' to the normal replenishment of existing species? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a d / �/L101it ) /fly MSC �,JQ e � Explanation: ace rl.Y/ a4l,uc • C. ,& . ate Cn «d', 0 L.c> c l c9C'.^��x-t•6j .�', ZiS. Ur. a.c c' �� 'vi rre / ,1 / 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or number of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and �S!' shellfish, benthic organisms,insects or microfauna)? N (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? ✓ 6. Noise. Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? 111 Explanation: / n r,tea +aa!'F P Licht and Glare. Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal produce new light or glare? F Explanation: /,r, A-4 cf. pv;c, iZ /r /,o b l. ', Al S / r €_ 6- cm Res∎ > J N5t't,I.1 (I Cc: - r {r e( Mi ni 1.) er ( / ,1 Art di Ae ath 1 c, tit- Zr- -a 8. Land Use. (a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Yes Maybe No T10 . p L` ,'1 f Nu-e{ O pp., n .-o OA' w l `- i_ r l & : er ! - f t r c�Jr��. -C✓ c_lho or? J -», /CC 4 L to C- !0nrV27 uca-. -. e J /) Yes Maybe No 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect additional housing? Explanation: Explanation: 4 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions Explanation: 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, or growth rate of the human population of an ea? Explanation: distribution, density, Yes Maybe No t Sol 44 10 9 A.444-1 existing housing, or create a demand for Yes Maybe No ScL %/ ' 4 4 cv -C 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? Explanation: L% e c /1 /10,e. .l)Rice c:,,' ( f or 0. Da coLcIAPc LJ00 60 /7LC (C S(tl i . A A tf rf-Th 6 Lrc»L "L 0 L, r".c t I(Yt_r ^.:t Cr-: to 1.ii((tCLIC . ,C l , e.P (Jig , , . ('nn, 1 ,flh � CJ LPJ J / - b'-r,�f 14. Public S Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result Yes Maybe No in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: IA -LAt Censii€4 (be �i41 Q . � Itut 4 (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? 1 - (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including reads? (f) Other governmen 1 services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of.energy? Explanation: Yes Maybe No i/ Yes Maybe No t/ <1 /de die( 0)J r - A O t'ci (a CI ((L�.B( S l.`I -r 7F�W /,JJ:// e d i.ciw Yes Maybe No V 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems. or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazards Yes Maybe No or potential health hazard (including mental health)? Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation: Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or Yes Maybe No quantity of existing recreational opportunities? ✓ Explanation: ) Yes Maybe No 20. Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a i L/ significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? . . . Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any will- ful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may with- draw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might i e in reliance upon this checklist. Date: ) I i IC? ? Proponent: (Please Print or Type) Proponent: LA 1'-4-0' J: v Address: Cj j f et) / A/ /97, / /n., ,7.-1 . Phone: ai-D -S C' Y..)- Person completing form: FOR STAFF USE ONLY Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: �� %!f i )� i 0• Based or this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff: A. vised:: August, 1981 (b) Communication systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks' (e) Storm water drainage? C q.w Yh LL 1r, clivekdl c?t_\_Qk._T� r.:di ' k Lac1. c Yes Maybe No L� (f) Solid waste and disposal?, , Explanation:( Po to 1 b r nn de Ac. 91 / /j . ' • lei J % t 17 C: . S /c J e .c Phone: Date: ) 4 / / - s' 8)s ..f Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recommends /issues a proposed declaration of nonsignificance. B. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommends /issues a final declaration of significance. C. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recommends /issues a final declaration of nonsignificance. Yes Maybe No OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON No V6oderZ_ _J 8__ 19 8� TO: Spokane County Planning Department FROM: County Engineer's Department % Q6J4J ' SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval -Zone Change -- Number: ..a4 86 ' 83 - __ _ _ ______ Applicant's Name ,P_EpP.rrntvg. 441*c/ -Fn/ Section ,7 Township „:7r _N, Range yy EWM The following "conditions of approval" for the above - referenced zone change are submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee for inclusion in the staff analysis and "findings and order" of the hearing scheduledAee546!{_e, 1953. Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit cot isrt vse pro roseoi 1. Applicant shall dedicate_ feet on for right -of -way prior to any use of the property. 2. Applicant shall dedicate_ feet on for right -of -way and slope easements as necessary prior to any use of the property. 3. Applicant shall dedicate a toot radius on and prior to any use of the property. 4. Applicant shall dedicate feet on and a toot radius on and _ ______ _fur right -of -way prior to any use of the property. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer. 6. Access permits and improvements to must be approved by the Washington Department of Transportation. 7. Access permits and improvements to by the City of 8. (a) Applicant shall improve County TYPICAL roadway section No. (d) Applicant shall Improve County TYPICAL roadway Section No. (e) Other specific improvements: oh ®n = t nN T101 being must be approved In a manner consistent with,Spokane minimum paving width (b) Applicant shall improve_ _ _ . in a manner consistent with Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section Nu. - minimum paving width ___ -____ (c) Applicant shall improve In a manner consistent with Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. minimum paving width . In n ntiun:r consistent with Spokane • minimum paving width _ Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Healthy District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project prior Lo the issuance of any building permit on the property. O A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall he submitted and approved hy the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. 0 The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. t in. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a wilting participant in any petition or resolution which purpose Is the formation of a Road improvement District (RID) for said improvement pursuant to KCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County wiLl not participate in the cost of . these improvements. 14. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvement stated herein, the appli- cant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein hy joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required road improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. 15. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as ap- proved by the Spokane County Engineer. 16 All required improvements shalL conform to the current State Of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable county standards and or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 17. Applicant shalt file a petition for the vacation of prior to any use of the property. • 18. Applicant shall construct a paved and delineated access approach(s) to meet the existing pavement on 19. Access to Road shall be prohibited until such time as specifically authorized by the Spokane County Engineer. 20 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of December 8, 1983 (continued) 3) iZE- 86- 83,`Local Business to Commercial: Redeemer Lutheran Church Location: Proposal: Action: Generally located west and adjacent to Mullan Road, approxi- mately 300 feet north of Mullan Road and Valley Way in Section 17- 25 -44. Recycling Center Approval. ( Vote: 3 - 0 ) 4) ZW- 65 -82, Agricultural with Airport Overlay to Freeway Commercial with Airport Overlay: Union Oil Company of California Location: Generally located southeast and adjacent to the Medical Lake Interchange of Interstate 90; bounded on the east by Hayford Road and on the north and west by Interstate 90 in Section 12- 24 -41. Proposal: Auto /Truck Stop Action: Continued to the February 2, 1984 Public Hearing of the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee. ( Vote: 3 - 0 ) This agenda item was continued to allow the applicant and staff sufficient time to address and resolve the areas of concerns identified by staff. 5) ZE- 90 -83, Agricultural to Restricted Industrial: A & V Investments Location: Proposal: Action: Generally located west of and adjacent to University Road, south of and adjacent to Oberlin Road, and north of and adjacent to the Spokane International Railroad right of way in Section 8- 25 -44. Truss Manufacturing and Industrial Uses Approval. ( Vote: 3 - 0 ) 6) ZE- 70 -83, Two - Family Residential (R -2) to Commercial: Wold Location: Generally located between Argonne and Mullan Roads, approxi- mately 550 feet north of Valley Way and 600 feet south of Broadway Avenue in Section 17- 25 -44. Proposal: Demonstration Batting and Driving Range Cage Action: Approval. ( Vote: 3 - 0 ) 7) ZE- 89 -83, Residential Office to Commercial: Schultz Location: Proposal: Action: Generally located southwest of the intersection of Liberty Lake Road with Interstate 90 and bounded by Interstate 90 on the north, Liberty Lake Road on the east, and Appleway Road on the south in Sections 10 and 15- 25 -45. Commercial and Office Center Continued to the January 5, 1984, Public Hearing of the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee. (.Vote: 3 - 0 ) Additional time is required to allow the County Engineering Department and the State Department of Transportation adequate time to review a redesigned site plan submitted by the applicant. (contd.) P7 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DECEMBER 8, 1983 I. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: REQUESTED ZONING: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED USE: EXISTING USE: SITE SIZE: II. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS STAFF REPORT HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -86 -83 NEW HOPE TRAINING CENTER c/o Ron Kusler COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Major Commercial Redeemer Lutheran Church Commercial Local Business (established in 1982) Recycling Center Recycling Center and Vacant Approximately 9,100 Square Feet PRIORITY SEWER SERVICE AREA: Yes AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA: Yes PROJECT LOCATION: This site is generally located west and adjacent to Mullan Road, approximately 300 feet north of Valley Way in Section 17- 25 -44. 1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: All property along the Argonne /Mullan corridor is designated Major Commercial. Commercial rezoning of the site would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. /9 N co oti • Y ; - f • h 1 Y N Q II. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (continued) ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -86 -83 2) ZONING: North Local Business, Established, 1979 East Agricultural, Established, 1948 Two - Family Residential, Established, 1972 West Local Business, Established, 1982 South Residential Office, Established, 1976 3) LAND USE: Site Recycling Center and Vacant North Vacant East Kinder Care, Office, and Vacant South New Hope Training Center, Church, and Vacant West Single Family and Vacant 4) HISTORY OF LAND USE ACTIONS: Land along the Argonne /Mullan corridor has routinely been upgraded to non - residential zones since the mid- 1970's. Since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, the rezone activity to Local Business and Commercial has become predominate in the corridor. This present rezone is a portion of a larger site that was rezoned to Local Business in 1982 for an anticipated Millwood Furniture store. That store was eventually built elsewhere. 5) NEIGHBORHOOD CONSIDERATIONS: The parcel lies in the block bounded on the east and west by two major north /south arterials; Mullan Road and Argonne Road, respectively. Most sites in the block or with frontage on the arterials are being developed to retail, commercial, and office uses. The area has good access to both Sprague Avenue and Interstate 90. III. SITE ANALYSIS 1) SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND CONSIDERATIONS: The site has no structures and currently one driveway access to Mullan Road. A recycling facility, consisting of a conveyor and trailer, occupies approximately half the total rezone site. 010 III. SITE ANALYSIS (continued) ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -86 -83 2) AGRICULTURAL SUMMARY: The Major Commercial designation of the Comprehensive Plan is not intended to protect agricultural land. 3) SITE PLAN INFORMATION: SITE SIZE: Approximately 9,100 Square Feet EXISTING BUILDINGS: 0 PROPOSED FACILITY: Conveyor, Trailer, and Parking IV. CONCLUSIONS PARKING: Parking Required: Parking Provided: To Be Determined 5 Spaces BUFFERING TECHNIQUES: At present the applicant plans to only have some portable fence guards to keep customers off adjoining properties. No landscaping treatments are planned. Since the use of the site for a portable recycling facility is rather temporary, staff doesn't recommend extensive landscape improvements. Buffering and landscape requirements would be necessary at a stage of more permanent development. Review should only be administrative. OTHER SITE PLAN CONSIDERATIONS: The recycling facility will only use approximately half of the 9,100 square foot rezoned site. The rest will remain vacant or could be used for additional parking, if warranted. Rezoning of this site to Commercial is appropriate in light of the Comprehensive Plan and trends in this arterial corridor. The portable recycling facility will probably by only a temporary use that will eventually give way to a more intense permanent use. Improvements to the site should be anticipated at that time. ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -86 -83 V. RECOMMENDED AGENCY CONDITIONS, IF APPROVED: a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. The Zoning Administrator shall approve a specific exterior lighting plan for the approved area prior to installation of such lighting. (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination to the area with full consideration to adjacent properties). 2. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 3. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits for a use other than the existing portable recycling center. 4. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 5. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 6. The specific development plan will be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 7. All current standards of the Commercial Zone, as amended, shall be complied with in the development of this site. 8. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff. 9. The applicant shall comply with RCW 58 -17 and the Spokane County Platting Ordinances prior to issuance of building permits. ot a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued) 10. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolution #77 -1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements, or file appropriate documents to the effect that the NOTICE OF ACTION is waived in accordance with Spokane County Commissioners' • Resolution #82 -0458 dated May 4, 1982. 11. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the physical environment; a finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of the project; and a final declaration of non - significance is hereby to be issued. b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit For Any Use Other Than That Being Proposed: 1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer. 2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. 3. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. 43 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -86 -83 c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -86 -83 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) 4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 5. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. 6. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 7. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners'Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. 1. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health District prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. 2. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT (continued) 3. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits bythe Health Officer, proposed lot is authorized the use of an individual on -site sewage system. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health Services. 6. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibited. e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. The site is located in Fire District # 1. 2. Mains and fire hydrants will be required to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Department of Building and Safety. f) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Water Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company, and they will supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -86 -83 1. As the project site is located in the suspended particulate non - attainment area, it is required that all travelled surfaces be paved and kept clean. 2. Objectionable odors can result from the handling and storage of recycled cans. The applicant must comply with Section 6.04 of Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority Regulation I. 3. Considerable noise can result from the handling of aluminum cans with use of sorters, conveyors, etc. The applicant should address mitigating measures for noise. A. INTRODUCTION C. FINDINGS OF FACT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -86 -83 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER This matter having come before the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee on December 8, 1983, and the members of the Committee present being Richard L. Skalstad, Chairman, Jane E. Myers and Jerry Williams. 8. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Redeemer Lutheran Church, is requesting approval of a zone reclassification, File No. ZE- 86 -83, Local Business to Commercial, for the purpose of developing a recycling center. 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, church, New Hope Training Center, commercial, and vacant. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for Major Commercial development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Local Business. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with, and the Committee concurs with the Declaration of Non- Significance. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 7. That the applicant has demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the proposed rezone is justified. 8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed both approval and disapproval of the proposed use. ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -86 -83 C. FINDINGS OF FACT (continued) 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 11. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) That the portable recycling facility is a temporary use which can be expected to be discontinued at such time as pressure develops for a permanent use of the site. D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. The Zoning Administrator shall approve a specific exterior lighting plan for the approved area prior to installation of such lighting. (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination to the area with full consideration to adjacent properties). 2. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 3. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits for a use other than the existing portable recycling center. 4. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 5. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 2 a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued) 6. The specific development plan will be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 7. All current standards of the Commercial Zone, as amended, shall be complied with in the develouu.ent of this site. 8. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff. 9. The applicant shall comply with RCW 58 -17 and the Spokane County Platting Ordinances prior to issuance of building permits. 10. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolution #77 -1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any oh -site improvements, or file appropriate documents to the effect that the NOTICE OF ACTION is waived in accordance with Spokane County Commissioners' Resolution #82 -0458 dated May 4, 1982. 11. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance has been issued at least fifteen (15), days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assessment of -the proposal's adverse impacts to the physical environment; a finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of the project; and a final declaration of non - significance is hereby to be issued. b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -86 -83 Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit For Any Use Other Than That Being Proposed: 1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer. 2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance, of a building permit on the property. 3 4 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -86 -83 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) 3. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. 4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted , and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving, or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 5. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. 6. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater, Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 7. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners'Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) or a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter] 36.94. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health District prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. 2. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 3. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits bythe Health Officer, proposed lot is authorized the use of an individual on -site sewage system. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health Services. 6. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibited. e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. The site is located in Fire District # 1. 2. Mains and fire hydrants will be required to be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Department of Building and Safety. f) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Water Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company, and they will supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -86 -83 1. As the project site is located in the suspended particulate non - attainment area, it is required that all travelled surfaces be paved and kept clean. 2. Objectionable odors can result from the handling and storage of recycled cans. The applicant must comply with Section 6.04 of Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority Regulation I. 5 E. ORDER ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.: ZE -86 -83 g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY (continued) 3. Considerable noise can result from the handling of aluminum cans with use of sorters, conveyors, etc. The applicant should address mitigating measures for noise. The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Redeemer Lutheran Church, for a zone reclassification as described in the application should be APPROVED. Motion by: Williams Seconded by: Myers Vote: Unanimous to Approve to the COMMERCIAL ZONE ( 3 - 0 ) HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE ATTEST: For WALLIS D. HUBBARD Plannin. Director 64.1w By STEVE 0 O 0 "SKI Zoning Administrator Date: jr p_ / 9, 6 E ABOVE D VO E