Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PE-1743-93
• • ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FILE# Date to Review .2-2444 Time # Date to AA & DR 12-22-93 Time 1:15 Date Received 12-10-93 Project Name SCOTTISH (SP-831-B) ADD PE-1743.93 Related File # ( ) D 2.2 /„ c No. Lots 8 No.Acres 6.1 Section - Township - Range SITE ADDRESS N MONTGOMERY/E LONG PARCEL # 07551-0106 Applicant's Name DEAN GREER Address 0609 N SEMINOLE-SPOKANE WA 99208 Contact person FLOOD ZONE Phone # 466-0908 Work # Date Conditions mailed Planning Contact Person ✓ NO W S SCHOOL 356 Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name STACY BJORDAHL Phone # LAWRENCE LEINWEBER TAYLOR ENGINEERING INC 106 W MISSION STE 206 SPOKANE WA 99201 326-2415 Phone # Date Submitted Description Initials n r 'i l /l g4AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES OR PRIORITY FEE COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTIN9 " / / /O /./'FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING /) A / / NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED / / DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMII 1ED / /_ ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS :7.'1 / a-\ / 5\ HEARING EXAM ALAPPROVED _DENIED -_APPEALED BBC IN PROJECT APPROVED _DENIED A-(0-, 4 r crvhnan ro ,S UQ-c, d,2 6- 07 - 9 i- /4 ntiorn-ipl - / S F Scc6�,=4.6f, Tom. / r• Fey,-. 0- 7.0.8. 94 cl..aci at 54,"-__ P, ..a - /2-4- 5,-;..fr6 � ,-, 9 •0,9 -9 4- P(s5-//-o�r-,., Ply , d Sul)-.,;-/LQ ,,-,. 8 - 30 - 9 act"Q $ 3Tor-PQx..ia- ,_4 -2,. l C5,-, 9 - 9 a - rt cf ccMn.r. e ItiF3 kj Sv.c u a 0e V ilk tPk N -e 9 - 02/ -94- ,Roa 2{ 57-a,--.., pi.,„„- ScL_`717,-tQ a2..L., 9- 7,0- 94- -goal 54-6r-6,___P.Ja.,2,„ - c4 2v:e..J O oca«-,-, i o - S - 9 9- ,ad 4,' shot-,,, _P1 . - -(1-7-4- S.t6.,..ViLQ / 0 - &- 9 4` k A S-f-or-rt lolavna a -if rovegt / O -a l - 9-# 5/6- V En R ( n,.✓M £5 � $-6- -9c c.,tl f, �4ttia..,5 it Ch0-�52 PI hro.+ Dam& Gee./ 'j 5co71 R, st,jv. c..a..cIc co...C.ia t,yrr•., g;-9,1-a9 4,,Jhit r✓tinaits r-ir1 Ltd ew.,t,AcdC 63 - a? - 9b E-r--ca- -t-o ic-\ i a 'lu QL.LI -00 ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FILE# Related File # ( Sf 8 i /_p Date to Review Time Date to AA & DR 12-22-93 Time 1:15 Date Received 12-10-93 PE-. Project Name IRISH EST No. Lots 8 No.Acres 6.1 e - Township— SITE ADDRESS N MONTGOMERY/E LONG PARCEL # 07551-0106 Applicant's Name DEAN GREER Phone # 466-0908 Address 0609 N SEMINOLE-SPOKANE WA 99208 Work # Contact person FLOOD ZONE Date Conditions mailed Planning Contact Person VNO W S SCHOOL 356 Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name STACY BJORDAHL Phone # LAWRENCE LEINWEBER TAYLOR ENGINEERING INC 106 W MISSION STE 206 SPOKANE WA 99201 326-2415 Phone # 456-2205 Date Submitted Description Initials / / AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES OR PRIORITY FEE COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING / / FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING / / NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED / / / DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMII"IED / / ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS / / HEARING EXAM _APPROVED _DENIED -_APPEALED BBC / PROJECT APPROVED DENIED RECEIVED MAR 2 5 1994 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER INTRODUCTION This matter has come before the Hearing Examiner Committee on March 24, 1994. The members of the Committee present are: Harry Gibbons, Chair, Brenda Bodenstein and Donald Moore. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Dean Greer requests approval of PE-1743-93, Preliminary Plat of Scottish Addition to subdivide approximately 6.19 acres into 8 lots for single family dwellings and those uses allowed in the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The property is generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Long Road and Montgomery Avenue in the NE 1/4 of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. 2. On February 24, 1994 The Hearing Examiner Committee voted unanimously to continue this item to the next available public hearing to allow the applicant to provide adequate public notice. 3. The Committee adopts the Planning Department Report as a part of this record. 4. The existing land uses in the area include single family residences, large animal keeping, and the Spokane River. 5. The proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 6. The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as Urban and within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone. The Urban category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of a "citylike" environment which includes various land uses and intensive residential development. Residential net densities in the Urban category should range between 1 and 17 units per acre. The proposed density of 1.13 units per acre for this proposal is in accord with the density range suggested by the Urban category. 7. The existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone does implement and conform to the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. 8. The Arterial Road Plan designates Long Road and Montgomery Avenue as Local Access Streets, with a recommended right of way width of 60 feet. 9. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) previously established as Agricultural zoning in 1958 and redesignated to Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) on January 1, 1991 pursuant to the 3-21-1-9 `f HEC Order for PE-1743-93 Page 2 Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the proposal does conform to the requirements of the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone. 10. The provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with and a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued. The Committee, after independent review, hereby adopts the DNS. 11. The legal requirements for public notice have been fulfilled. 12. The owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapproval of the proposed use. 13. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare especially in light of the conditions recommended by the reviewing agencies. 14. The subdivision proposal is generally consistent with RCW 58.17 and the County subdivision regulations, promoting the public health, safety and general welfare in accordance with standards established by the state and Spokane County. The proposal as conditioned does provide adequate public facilities as cited in RCW 58.17.110 (2). More specifically: a. open spaces b. drainage ways c. public and/or private rights -of -way d. potable water e. sanitary waste disposal f. parks and recreation facilities g. playgrounds h. schools and schoolgrounds 15. The Washington State Board of Health implemented new regulations regarding the use of on -site sewage disposal systems effective January 1, 1994. This proposal was submitted prior to January 1, 1994 and implementation of the new State Board of Health regulations. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL 1. All Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant," which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors -in -interest. 2. The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record. HEC Order for PE-1743-93 Page 3 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zones, as amended. 2. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. 3. The Planning Director/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 4. A final plat name/number shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name/number to be approved by the Planning Director/designee. 5. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. 6. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for three (3) years, specifically to April 1, 1997. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request approximately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 7. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 8. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 9. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 10. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 11. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. HEC Order for PE-1743-93 Page 4 12. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 13. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision, and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 14. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state -licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat," including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as -built" water system. 15. The Water Plan and the above four (4) conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director/designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 16. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 17. The dedicatory language of the plat shall contain the following statement: "Duplexes are prohibited." 18. The applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Planning Department that the existing accessory structures located on proposed Lot 3 have been removed prior to the filing of the final plat. If the structures are not removed, a primary use shall be established for each remaining structure on individual Lots to recognize the "sheds" as accessory structures. 19. The Owner shall negotiate with the Central Valley School District and submit a recorded copy of a voluntary agreement making provisions for public schools prior to finalization and recording of this plat. The agreement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measures. The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement to purchase property within said plat pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington DEC Order for PE-1743-93 Page 5 (58.17.205), that adequate provisions for school facilities must be made conditioned on a future agreement between the plattor and school district. Voluntary agreements between the Owner and School District shall conform to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 82.02. 20. The Owner shall negotiate with the Spokane County Parks Department and submit a recorded copy of a voluntary agreement making provisions for public parks prior to finalization and recording of this plat. The agreement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measures. The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement to purchase property within said plat pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (58.17.205), that adequate provisions for parks must be made conditioned on a future agreement between the plattor and Spokane County Parks Department. Voluntary agreements between the Owner and Spokane County Parks Department shall conform to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 82.02. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS 1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. Plans, profiles, and cross -sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as -built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right-of-way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 6. All construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way is to be completed prior to filing each final plat, or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction I3EC Order for PE-1743-93 Page 6 certification, "as -built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 7. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the county road system. 8. Existing county roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to Spokane County standards. 9. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. 10. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns and successors. 11. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Local Access standard for the improvement of Montgomery Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 9-11 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing is also required. 12. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Local Access standard for the improvement of Long Road, which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 9-11 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing is also required. 13. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended, which resolution establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 14. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing county road system warrants the dedication of additional right-of-way and the roadway improvements herein specified. 15. There may exist utilities, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane County assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. Applicant(s) should check with the applicable utility purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to determine whether applicant(s) or the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County HEC Order for PE-1743-93 Page 7 Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petidon for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94." 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 4. The dedication shall state: "Each new dwelling unit shall be double -plumbed for connection to future areawide collection systems." SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any attached sheets as noted. 2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each tract of the plat. 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 9. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that suitable sites for on -site sewage disposal systems are available on all lots. HEC Order for PE-1743-93 Page 8 10. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health officer, the use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems may be authorized. 11. The dedicatory language of the plat will state: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on -site sewage systems may be authorized." 12. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 13. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant to the water plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building and Safety Department, and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." SPOKANE COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 1. This plat requires one new fire hydrant at the East end of the plat. You may install the hydrant on the South side of Montgomery Avenue where the existing water main lies. This hydrant needs to be installed prior to building on Lots 6, 7 and 8. SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1. All air pollution regulations must be met. 2. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, construction and excavation projects be controlled. This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinlders or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads should be treated, and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be controlled, as well as emissions from all other construction -related activities. 3. All traveled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) must be paved and kept clean. 4. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces. 5. Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than burning (i.e., construction waste, etc.). 6. All solid fuel burning devices (wood stoves, pellet stoves, etc.) must comply with local, state, and federal rules and regulations. HEC Order for PE-1743-93 Page 9 CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1. See Planning Department Condition No. 19. SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, RECREATION AND FAIR 1. See Planning Department Condition No. 20. HEC Order for PE-1743-93 Page 10 ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the above Findings of Fact and Conclusion, APPROVES the application of Dean Greer for the subdivision of approximately 6.19 acres into 8 lots for single family residences and those uses allowed in the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone as described in the application PE-1743-93 known as Scottish Addition. Motion by: Donald Moore Seconded by: Brenda Bodenstien Vote: (3-0) UNANIMOUS TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY A 11 hST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, etiee A 1'EST: For WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Director vJOOHN W. PEDERSON Senior Planner dAti 4/, /ff March 24, 1994 Pursuant to Spokane County regulations, any aggrieved party has the right to appeal this written decision to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners within ten (10) calendar days of the signing of this order. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a written appeal, preferably on forms designed for such purpose, to the Board of County Commissioners, West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, along with a $210 processing fee payable to the Spokane County Treasurer. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at (509) 456-2205. Return to County Engineer Right of Way Department P1743 rM u A i i i V Lu N SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING Spokane County, Washington DRAINAGE EASEMENT 111 4034838 Page: 1 of 2 091121199E 11:50A Spokane So, WA IN THE MATTER OF MONTGOMERY AVENUE, RF NO. 1689, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the Grantors Victor Ivanov and Zita Ivanov, Husband and Wife, of the County of Spokane, State of Washington, for and in consideration of Mutual Benefits, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grants to The Public of the County of Spokane, State of Washington, a Drainage Easement over, under, and across the following described real property situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washington: AFFECTS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.: 55071.6404 That portion of Lot 4, Block 1 of SCOTTISH ADDITION, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 22, Page 84, Spokane:County, Washington, being the South 24.00 feet of the East 20.00 feet of the West 50.00 feet. Located in the Northeast Quarter (NE '/) of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, W.M., Spokane County, Washington. L� l rirr Drainage Easements, as described hereinab d��rsr eliittfe� urpose of installing, operating and maintaining drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, at y>igfa tef bathe public. The County of Spokane is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress t p; e tziasiktknts adjacent to the public right of way. The property owner shall maintain the draiiEgei areasamillt a lieratanent live cover of lawn turf, with, optional shrubbery and/or trees, which do not obstiej t r Q< ablation of storm drainage water in the drainage area as indicated by the approved plans. e, ,.����� The Grantors and or assigns will construct the drafM1 P1acilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineers Office. The individual lot owners or their successors in interest shall maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the Engineers Office. The property owner or his representative shall inform each succeeding purchaser of all Drainage Easements on the property and his responsibility for maintaining drainage facilities within said Drainage Easements. The Drainage Easement described hereinabove is to and shall run with the land. No modification of the boundaries of said Drainage Easement can be made without the prior approval of Spokane County. Whenever the individual lot owners or their successors in interest fail to maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved Drainage Plan, a notice will be given to the individual lot owners or their successors in interest by the County. If not corrected after ten (10) days, the County has the right to correct the maintenance failure or have it corrected at the expense of the individual lot owners or their successors in interest. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within Drainage Easements or floodplain areas, nor the responsibility for any drainage whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and/or maintenance of drainage courses in Drainage Easements on private property. This Drainage Easement will terminate at such time the described areas are platted. -over- RE. Excise��� Tax Exempt Dat 18 Spoke Co ntyntyTreasurer By: uul\f 6L I d\apCINAgm. az Wrztir :saiidxa luaurluroddn XI •ounNodg In gurpisai `uo42uigstM3o olnlS agl.io3 pun uI OI'ISfld A . • TO 70-77/ ya '00 aueyoa6 y09: n 965U I.660 8£8b£Ob OO'O$ VII '7Z6I` ../"d q lf.. u jo ,Cnp ft u i i A u"o y sup pas pun purr' ,Cur iapun uanip pauoiluam ma'am sasodmd pun sasn aql roj `(s)jnnprnrpui pins jo poop pun Ion /Crn;union pun aai3 aqI aq of Iuaurrulsui pins all pa2pajMoulon pun luau nljsui Suioaro3 aqI palnoaxa own (s)jnnprnipui aqI aq oI our oI uAouI Xjjnuosiad Con 0(riCt ro f/ 7 pivY / a 0l/-warry I /) our aiojaq parnadd2 •,Cjjnuosiad /Cup sigl up G I / ss ( 3NY)IOdS d0 A,LNfIOO ( NOIONIHSYM dO d1V1S ---esen o uzMr ';o :,CH P.4/ :NCH jo ,Cnp 7 sigl (s)was pun (s)punt-' }as olunazaq wing .671-4Od2IHHM SSaMILYn NI NO. 94 1460 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR SPOKANE COUNTY IN THE MA 11'ER OF FILING THE FINAL PLAT ) OF SCOTTISH ADDITION, PE-1743-93, WITH ) EXISTING URBAN RESIDENTIAL-3.5 (UR-3.5) ) ZONING, IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, ) RANGE 45 EWM, SPOKANE COUNTY, ) WASHINGTON ) RESOLUTION ' BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, that the Final Plat of Scottish Addition, PE-1743-93, with existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zoning, being that portion of the NE 1/4 of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 45 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Tract B of Short Plat No. SP-831-93, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 9 of Short Plats, page 74. Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. UPON THE RECOMMENDATION of the Spokane County Planning Department, the final plat is approved with the exception that the public rights of way dedicated in this plat will not be established for maintenance purposes until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a separate resolution of the Board of County Commissioners. ADDITIONALLY, until the final plat document is filed in the Spokane County Auditor's Office, this subdivision has only preliminary plat status and is subject to expiration and null and void status if not periodically granted an extension of time consistent with the policies and procedures of the Planning Department. PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS / DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1994. Al IEST: WILLI»M E. DONAHUE /ler •f the Board By: Ros ne Montague, Deputy Cler BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANF CfQJJNTY, WASHINGTON Patricia A. Mummey S P O K A N C OFFICE OF Ti IE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. llormann, P.G., County Engineer A DIVISION OF T1IE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES ENGINEER'S AGREEMENT NUMBER P 174 3 This agreement between Spokane County and DAr✓ 6124'12. , (name o person) whose interest in the project is W/t%E/ (wner, agent, etc.) is entered into this /4 iay of f 'Rai-. , 19 9¢. This agreement is applicable to the project known as: -� .ocor s SN �j PlT, o,�l (project aaares br meanie ar nle number) pe-/7+ 3-13 That the individuals and parties named herein as having an interest in the above described property or project agree to the following: 1. Reimburse Spokane County for project review and inspection fees as specified in Chapter 9.14 of the Spokane County Code. The fees will be based on actual salary costs incurred by Spokane County for project reviews and / or inspections plus a ten percent administrative charge, and will be billed monthly as accrued. Any final billing amounts, to include any late fecs or any other expenses incurred in the collection of an overdue account must be paid prior to the County's acceptance of the project for filing. 2. The undersigned agrees that these fees are due and payable upon receipt of the billing as specified above. 3. Any invoices not paid within 30 days of the invoice date will be subjected to a late fee charge of 1% per month (12% per year) on the unpaid balance of the account and any accrued late fee charges. In addition, if any outstanding balance on the account for this project is not paid within 30 days of the invoice date, no further reviews of the project documents will be conducted until the entire account balance is paid. Any balance on the account for this project not paid within 65 days of the invoice date may result in legal action or the initation of other collection procedures, including referral to a collection agency. The Sponsor will be liable for any and all expenses incurred by the County for the collection of overdue accounts. 4. The monthly billing should be sent to the attention of: NAME: De J Cie&eM. ADDRESS: N. 160 7 SEI'N /A/O LE CITY, STATE: Spo4A4/s0, k✓4- ZIP CODE: / 9,ZO,g PIIONE#: 4V4-OfAvg I understand that failure to pay these fees may result in delay in completion or approval of the project or other possible sanctions. ❑ If this fee agreement is completed by someone other than the Sponsor (i.e., the project owner or a principal in the firm sponsoring the project), such as the Engineer designing the project, then written authorization from the Sponsor specifically authorizing the Agent to execute this Fee Agreement is attached to this Fee Agreement. SIGNATURE By: (PRINT NAME) RETURN YELLOW COPY TO SI"OKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS IApV\agreemcn.rce 8/20/93 W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane; WA 99260-0170 (509) 956-3600 FAX (509) 956-4715 BEFORE THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN THE MATTER OF:. - ., r.` ) SHORT PLAT NO ' SP.831=93 ) FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION THIS MATTER, an application for subdivision of land, from Dean Greer has been received and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulations, on the 9 (p 1'1 day of April, 1993. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The individual signing below has further been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering the decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning. 2. The proposal is to divide approximately 6.51 acres into 2 lots for one existing single family residence and one 6.2 acre parcel for single family residential uses and those uses permitted in the underlying zone. 3. There have been two previous proposals to subdivide this property. The first proposal was an approved preliminary short plat (SP-577-89), that expired on July 1, 1992 as a result of the applicant's failure to finalize the plat. The second proposal was the preliminary plat of Golden Acres (PE-1661-92), which the applicant, with approval from the Hearing Examiner Committee, withdrew on July 23, 1992. 4. The proposal is generally located at the northeast corner of Montgomery Avenue and Long Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 45 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. 5. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5), previously established as Agricultural (A) (File 480-58) zoning in 1958 and reclassified to UR-3.5 on January 1, 1991 pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the proposal does conform to the requirements of the existing UR-3.5 zone. 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the applicant shall demonstrate that the existing structures on parcel "B", labeled "Shed" meet the setback requirements of the Urban Residential- 3.5 (UR-3.5) zone. 7. The Spokane County Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Urban. The development and uses proposed are generally in accord with this category. 8. Surrounding uses are primarily single family residences and open spaces. 9. The required public notice was provided for this proposal and agencies having a potential interest in the project were notified and recommendations solicited. 10. Comments were received from adjoining property owners who are opposed to any high -density development in the neighborhood and consider this proposal the first step towards developing the site at a higher density in the near future. The proposal is compatible with the neighborhood maximum density of 3.5 dwelling units per acre. 11. The proposed short plat will be served by a public water system. Use of individual on - site septic systems are proposed. 12. The site is located within the Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA), which the Spokane Transit Authority (STA) provides public transportation services. STA route 18 , Broadway Feeder, provides connecting services to the site. 13. The Central Valley District No. 356 has commented on the proposed short plat. The District has indicated that existing school facilities are inadequate to serve the proposed short plat and has requested a voluntary financial contribution to assist in providing adequate capital facilities as required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 58.17.110. The Planning Department must assume that the agency of jurisdiction, in FINDINGS AND DECISION SP-831-93 Page 2 this case the Central Valley School District, has made a reasonable request. Approval of this short plat should include conditions requiring that provisions for adequate facilities be in place prior to recording this final plat in the form of a written agreement between the owner and the school district. 14. Recognizing the recommended conditions and Spokane County development standards, the proposed short subdivision makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety and general welfare and that the public use and interest will be served by platting the subdivision. The subdivision proposal is generally consistent with RCW 58.17 and the County subdivision regulations, promoting the public health, safety and general welfare in accordance with standards established by the state and Spokane County. The Planning Department has considered the provision of adequate public facilities as cited in RCW 58.17.110 (2). More specifically: a. open spaces b. drainage ways c. public and/or private rights -of -way d. transit e. potable water f. sanitary waste disposal g. parks and recreation facilities h. playgrounds i. schools and schoolgrounds j. sidewalks 15. An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the County Planning Department. The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other County policies and guidelines. The Planning Department has determined that "No probable significant adverse impacts" would result from the proposal being developed and has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance ("DNS"). The "DNS" was circulated to 8 other agencies of jurisdiction and other agencies/departments affected by the future development for review and comment. The "DNS comment period ended March 31, 1993 and was advertised 15 calendar days before said date by letter to adjacent property owners. DECISION Based upon the above noted Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Short Plat Application SP-831-93 is hereby APPROVED until May 1, 1996 subject to conditions noted below. Most of the conditions of approval shall be accomplished by the applicant and/or sponsor prior to finalization of the short subdivision. This decision is final unless appealed in writing, consistent with adopted appeal procedures. These Conditions of Approval apply to applicant(s), owner(s) of the property, heirs, assigns or any successors -in -interest to property. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone as amended. 2. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. 3. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 4. The Planning Director/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. (1 FINDINGS AND DECISION SP-831-93 Page 3 5. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for three (3) years, specifically to May 1, 1996. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request approximately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 6. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. 7. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 8. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 9. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. 10. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building pemiit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 11. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision, and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 12. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state -licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat" including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as -built" water system. 13. The Water Plan and the above four (4) conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director/designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 14. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 15. The Owner shall negotiate with the Central Valley School District and submit a recorded copy of the agreement making provisions for public schools prior to finalization and recording of this short plat. The agreement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measure(s). COUNTY ENGINEER'S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. FINDINGS AND DECISION SP-831-93 Page 4 2. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right- of-way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 3. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the county road system. 4. Existing county roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to Spokane County standards. 5. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns and successors. 6. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvements, pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. At such time as an RID is created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner(s), their heirs, grantees and assigns. This provision is applicable to Long Road and Montgomery Avenue. 7. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required road improvements. At such time as an RID is created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner(s), their heirs, grantees and assigns. This provision is applicable to Long Road and Montgomery Avenue. 8. The following statement shall be placed in the plat dedication: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition includes the owner(s)' property, and further not to object, by the signing of a ballot, to the formation of an RID by the resolution method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which resolution includes the owner(s)' property. If an RID is formed by either the petition or resolution method as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: (a) that the improvement(s) or construction contemplated within the proposed RID is feasible; (b) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceed the cost and expense of formation of the RID; and (c) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed. Provided further that the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of an RID by either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW, and to appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners affirming the final assessment roll. It is further agreed that at such time as an RID is created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner(s), their heirs, grantees and assigns without participation by Spokane County. The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of execution below. However, the owner(s) or successor(s) agree that if said RID waiver expires without construction of the required improvements, the owner(s) or successor(s) agree to construct the required improvements at their own expense, pay to Spokane County the then estimated cost of the required improvements to enable the County to complete the same, or furnish a bond or other secure method suitable to the FINDINGS AND DECISION SP-831-93 Page 5 County (which may include the execution of another RID waiver agreement) providing for or securing to the County the actual construction of the improvements. All of the requirements of this agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner(s), their successor(s) or assign(s)." This provision is applicable to Long Road and Montgomery Avenue. 9. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two , Local Access standard for the improvement of Long Road, which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 9-11 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing is also required. 10. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Local Access standard for the improvement of Montgomery Avenue, which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 9-11 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing is also required. 11. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended, which resolution establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 12. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing county road system warrants the dedication of additional right-of-way and the roadway improvements herein specified. The applicant shall dedicate the applicable radius on Long Road and Montgomery Avenue. 14. There may exist utilities, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane County assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. Applicant(s) should check with the applicable utility purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to determine whether applicant(s) or the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS. 1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any attached sheets as noted. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each tract of the plat. 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 8. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that suitable sites for on -site sewage disposal systems is available on tract B. FINDINGS AND DECISION SP-831-93 Page 6 9. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that the existing on -site sewage disposal system serving the residence located on tract A is wholly located within the boundaries of the tract. 10. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health officer, the use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems may be authorized. 11. The dedicatory language of the plat will state: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on -site sewage systems may be authorized." 12. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 13. The plat dedication shall contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building and Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this plat, and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each tract prior to sale of each tract and prior to issuance of a building permit for each tract." COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the fomiation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94." 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. Fire flows are applicable for this proposal. The minimum fire flow and flow duration will be based on a representative dwelling size for all floors not including the basement. The maximum dwelling size needs to be submitted to the Department of Buildings. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 1. Recommend the use of grassy swales, wet/dry ponds, or percolation areas to provide better treatment and protection to groundwater. 2. Proper erosion and sediment control practices must be used on the construction site and adjacent areas to prevent upland sediments from entering the natural stormwater drainage system. All areas disturbed or newly created by construction activities must be revegetated, use bioengineering techniques, use clean durable riprap, or some other equivalent type of protection against erosion when other measures are not practical. FINDINGS AND DECISION SP-831-93 Page 7 Approved the 01 day of April, 1993. /Ye/4 PEDERSON Senior Planner For: John Todd, Planner I Under State Law and County Ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with the appropriate appeal fee, payable to the Spokane County Treasurer, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456-2205. pc: County Engineer County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety Dean Greer, 9609 North Seminole, Spokane, WA 99208 Lawrence Leinweber, West 106 Mission, Spokane, WA 99201 Grace Frederick, East 17909 Riverway, Greenacres, WA 99016 William Cole, North 2518 Long Road, Greenacres, WA 99016 GREER CONSTRUCTION INC. N. 9609 SEMINOLE 466-0908 SPOKANE, WA 99208 u.a BANK 1 800 US BANKS U.S.BANK OPT WASEONGTON, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 1:'L1E000 b0Si: LiLL 3016760 24,67 /5' 19 21y 2467 19-10 111 1250 R i C J P 7 Dcre / 8 4/2 19 No. .: . Received From C'rPC[G/e CO/LFS %72G/C j` Address / V' QE()9 San? /AJr)k wlecl t 7 .0 Dollars $ 7071 ' For 7L' iV iV J'T�I��7 HOW E / / a A,r. Of ACCCUN; CASH :HECK SAIANCE DUE MONEY 090E2 P},-1743-93 -n N2 6.1 c. L al J CO VA 7 ,As ID cc u CC LC) j1DA LTON AVE via- • A V E. Gypsum Piont 41 • \\:13 -7‘ -77 tr‘li I I 2 es z . zicac..- 550 3 EL-2000 0 4 • 7 cc 3 • .. az . U3 174 175 17S- 0241178 0 179 MO 1882 • - .fisel • 'FAL . vati.•%4NCAMPAR MAX VV E LL AV moawC1 187 188 es 190 IS i iiii*In101476 4&reenocres Sc (Elemetttary) 3/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 54 E®743-93 3/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 55 PE-1743-93 l IT 1 •W? ©nn n l • 12 lAY 3 Trailerl Park L. OKPN� n+ loi frl0 of _WLID a E Austin ' " '� i 0 sle on :' LPL:.e• .. II`II II, TPI' • Park I • Greenacres �• •:---._.� 20) I, IIfir 2030 •T� .2038 1...r1 . r+ .. aC_ r r.1O1< EWE.LL ESL E, 125 N • Z 0 •. '•"••. .• AVE II .. Well .ln,rl" 2 3/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 56 SCOTTISH ADDITION 3/94 HEC Staff P.op©rt fg .PE=1743-93 7?/7 L:' � / 2 2R/G.<7';C,L/ ,JEST?/,-7 3 ( I , L Tao I r II „ 1 .I 0 Q 285 2850>3 {- - I I II_ `r 1 -�—I .1 :, Ll , 3 /9cco' g o 95' - 4i /4,250d .'o'. w' u5.4 EA�f, r y. 0 95' trn J In O N Z3,750 - Al 9s Soo rd.-so PROPOSED PLAT-` LOCATED IN THE J,W/r Or //,f,4 SEC➢OH ? , T.fM.. P.2.2C., W!w. SITE' DATA No. or LOTS AVERAGE SIZE PLAT AREA //5— c/o'w-ozn- ay.T ,5 \ x-4. S_5.88 — — — — —� ——.4o/vrso/•,�,er ard- ,,. v :..;7 /A5' 1/27 //5. // . 8 573y ._ __. _ — :. a5 I I Y ' S/n-lc9.'o- _: :3 /2 S' 7�/-92/3 SPOWWE COUNn, WASHINGTON SPONSOR]. 8 of",* owece N. 9109 Se ,no/c' 3'684 H� no/ 410. 99 so-9 6. /9 ocs- ( ,) +6-c,oa �/urt S 6e T, cicanekri • DESCRIPTION LOT B/ SP-d3/-935 BE/n/@. '. .A Po a: /o,✓ OF tO,4C 7'$ /L'At:4 6,CEen, ,4C.0 LQe/6AT/ON p%5rR/OT , •c Ron-dee-caooen /N.y0t44-le "E,; P/76 E 2 , /N SPo-BANE COLWX); 4k/a%.V c_ • _4 \i1 v/c..v'rr •.✓)HP }, I SURVEYOR'S CERTIOCATE r"u A ro :wrlry T01 MIS PROPOSED 11! l' /•Ar %AS PCIP.am sT MC FCC . P,!sflNC CoriM1 WCcOWSL MC 000 NOT REWIESCIa NL[Y RV"- I •I` I•. _ ea ! 7 • l-,. h e : lli t Taylor Engineering; ,Inc. G. CInL p•yP -nVAT IV.nly • �a..�•-�•.I TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING DEPARTMENT: -REPORT SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CURRENT PLANNING SECTION MARCH 24, 1994 SUBJECT: PE-1743-93; PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SCOTTISH ADDITION WITH EXISTING URBAN RESIDENTIAL-3.5 (UR-3.5) ZONE AND WITHIN THE 'AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA (ASA) OVERLAY ZONE I. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Dean Greer 9609 North Seminole Spokane, WA 99208 (509) 466-0908 Contact Planner: Stacy Bjordahl Location: Generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Long Road and Montgomery Avenue in the NE 1/4 of Section 7 , Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. Proposal: Preliminary Plat to subdivide approximately 6.19 acres into eight (8) lots for single family dwellings and those uses permitted in the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone. Background Information: There have been previous proposals to subdivide this property. The first action was an approved preliminary short plat (SP-577-89) which expired on July 1, 1992 as a result of the applicant's failure to finalize the plat. The subject property was also submitted as a preliminary plat of Golden Acres (PE-1661-92) in 1992, but was withdrawn by the applicant on July 23, 1992. The subject property was also submitted as Irish Estates (PE-1674-92) which was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on September 30, 1992 but denied upon appeal to the Board of County Commissioners on December 29, 1992. The Board's decision was further upheld upon appeal to Superior Court. Subsequent to the denial by Superior Court, the applicant submitted and finalized a two (2) lot short plat (SP-831-93) on the subject property. This preliminary plat proposal is a replat of Tract "B" of short plat 831-93. II. SITE INFORMATION A. Site Size: . Approximately 6.19 acres Gross Density: 1.3 units per acre or approximately .77 acres per unit 3/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 58 -B . Comprehensive=Plan at- --- - 1. Land Use Plan: The property is located within the Urban category_of_the Comprehensive Plan. The Urban category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of a "citylike" environment which includes various land uses and intensive residential development. Residential net densities in the Urban category should range between 1 and 17 units per acre. The proposed density of 1.13 units per acre for this proposal is in accord with the density range suggested by the Urban category. The Urban category recognizes the need for public facilities and services, including public water, sanitary and storm sewer lines, police and fire protection, and other services. The Board of County Commissioners have denied projects that lack these services and have considered "fill-in" developments. 2 . Arterial Road Plan: Long Road and Montgomery Avenue are designated by the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan as Local Access Streets with a recommended right of way width of 60 feet. The County Engineer is not requesting dedication or future acquisition area (FAA) for this proposal. 3 . County Parks Plan: The Spokane County Parks and Recreation Plan identifies Sullivan Park as the nearest park facility. Sullivan Park is located approximately 1.5 miles west of the site along Sullivan Road and the Spokane River. The Centennial Trail, which is owned and maintained by the Washington State Parks Department is located north of the proposal along the south bank of the Spokane River. C . Site Characteristics: The site fronts on Long Road and Montgomery Avenue which are both public streets without curb or sidewalk. The site is flat with three (3) accessory structures located in the southwest corner. The remaining property is vacant with deciduous trees, brush and shrubbery. D . Neighborhood Characteristics: Single family residences on larger lots characterize the surrounding area. Large animal keeping may also be found in the area. The Spokane River and Centennial Trail are located approximately 1/4 mile north of the site. E. Zoning Analysis: Prior to the implementation of the Spokane County Zoning Code on January 1, 1991, the site and most of the surrounding area was zoned Agricultural (A). Pursuant to the implementation of the Zoning Code, the site and surrounding area was redesignated to Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5). Some of the uses permitted in the Agricultural (A) zone, including large animal keeping and agricultural pursuits, still exist in the area as nonconforming uses. Proposal: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously classified as Agricultural (A) (if-480-58) 3/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 59 North:- ; —Urban Residential=-3:51UR-3.5)-establishediri 1991-, previously v: Sclassified•as Agricultural-(A),(/1 480-58) _ South: Fast: West: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991; previously classified as Agricultural (A) (ZE-286-57) Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously classified as Agricultural (A) (ZE-480-58) Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously classified as Agricultural (A) (ZE-480-58) F. Land Use Analysis: Land use in the area includes single family residences and some large animal keeping. The Spokane River is located north of the site and industrial uses are also located along the north bank of the river. Single family residences are located on lots ranging in size from approximately 12,000 square feet to 10 acres. Most residential development in the area has been accomplished through the short plat process including several short plats west of the site (SP-569-89; SP-728-91; SP-317-84) which created lots ranging from approximately 13,000 to 33,000 square feet in size. East of the site along Riverway Road, two short plats (SP-703-91; SP-522-87) were approved with lot sizes ranging from 30,000 square feet to 2 acres. The most recent short plat is located south of and adjacent to Montgomery Avenue and consists of three (3) 30,000 square feet lots (SP-721-92). " The proposed subdivision is generally consistent with recent land use trends in the area. Site: Accessory structures and vacant land. North: Single family residences with accessory structures South: Single family residences with accessory structures East: Single family residences with accessory structures West: Single family residences with accessory structures G . Circulation: Long Road and Montgomery Avenue will provide direct access to all the lots within the subdivision. H . Design: The preliminary plat consists of eight (8) lots on 6.19 acres. The applicant has indicated that each lot is restricted to single family residences and duplexes are not permitted. Lot sizes range from 14,250 square feet to 1.19 acres. Three (3) accessory structures are illustrated on the preliminary plat, and will removed or relocated prior to finalization of the plat. Each lot meets the minimum Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone development standards for lot size and road frontage. The preliminary plat does not illustrate any structure setbacks_ Each lot shall demonstrate compliance with all structure setback requirements at time of building permit application. 3/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 60 _- I.= Density:.The_nehdensity is .77 acres:per,unit oI r_approximately .3_units per - - acre. The proposed density is consistent with the Urban Residential-3.5--- - (UR-3.5) zone and the density guidelines of the Urban category of the- - - - -- Comprehensive Plan. Drainage: A drainage plan is required. This plan must be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer's Department prior to development. K. Power Transmission Lines/Other Known Easements: The preliminary plat illustrates several easements. A 20' x 20' utility easement is shown on proposed Lot 4 and an existing drainfield easement is shown on proposed Lot 3. A 10 foot wide utility easement is also shown along the frontage of all lots. Any additional or required easements will be disclosed during the final plat process. I,. Water Supply: The proposal is within the Consolidated Irrigation Water District. Provisions for water service shall be complied with prior to finalization of the plat. M. Sewage Disposal: Individual 6n-site sewage disposal systems will be utilized for sewage disposal as authorized by the Spokane County Health District. (Note: This proposal was accepted prior to January I, 1994 and the implementation of the new state health regulations.) N . School: The proposal is in the Central Valley School District No. 356. The Central Valley School District has responded to the proposal and has indicated that existing facilities are inadequate to accommodate additional students generated from new residential developments. The school district has requested the applicant be required to reach a voluntary agreement to mitigate the impact of this proposal on the school district. This request is included as a recommended condition of approval. J. O. Fire Protection: The proposal is within Fire District No. 1 . The Fire District and the Division of Buildings Department (Fire Marshall) are required to approve fire protection provisions prior to finalizing the preliminary plat. P . Wetlands: Spokane County Wetland Inventory Maps do not indicate the presence of permanent or seasonal wetlands on the site. Q. Cultural Resources: None have been identified. R. Spokane County Department of Parks, Recreation and Fair: The Spokane County Department of Parks, Recreation and Fair has responded to the proposal and has indicated that existing facilities are inadequate to serve additional residential developments. The Parks Department requests that the project sponsor negotiate a voluntary agreement to mitigate the impact on park facilities and provide appropriate provisions for parks as required by Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 58.117.110. This request is included as a recommended condition of approval. S . Special Information: The subject property is Tract "B" of short plat 831-93. This subdivision would be considered a replat of said short plat. 3/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 61 L.n.� LII:—ENV-IRONMENTAL__REVIEW . . An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by_the County Planning Department. The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other County policies and guidelines. The Planning Department has determined that "No probable significant adverse impacts" would result from the proposal being developed and has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance ("DNS"). The "DNS" was circulated to 12 other agencies of jurisdiction and other agencies/departments affected by the future development for review and comment. The "DNS" comment period ends February 22, 1994 and was advertised 15 calendar days before said'date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within 400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site. The Hearing Examiner may consider additional environmental related testimony at the public hearing. ' IV. PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION The proposedpreliminary plat is generally consistent with the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone and implements the Goals, Objectives, and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. As designed, the lot sizes and density are generally compatible with existing residential uses in the area. However, recent Board of County Commissioner decisions have considered sewer availability and denied non "fill-in" proposals. The Planning Department recommends approval, as conditioned. V. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL i . All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant", which terms shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. ii. The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-3.5 ,(UR-3.5) and Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zones, as amended. 2. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. 3. The Planning Director/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 3/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 62 • 4. • Afinal plat "name/number-shall be=indicated before-the•final=plat is -filed such•-- -r-7 75117. name/number to be approved.by.the-Planning Director/designee. -- _ - —_- 5. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated.- - 6. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for three (3) years, specifically to March 1, 1997. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request approximately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 7. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 8. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 9. Three (3) current certificates of tide shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 10. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 11. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fue protection district, Counry -4- Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. 12. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 13. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision, and the 3/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 63 --applicant-shall-provide for -individuakdomesticzwater-service as-welbas fire.. T protection toeach.Idt priorto-sale bf.each-lot and=prior-to-issuance•of kbuilding . - • permit for eaeh.lot." - - 14. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state -licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat," including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on acopy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as -built" water system. 15. The Water Plan and the above four (4) conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director/designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 16. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 17. The dedicatory language of the plat shall contain the following statement: "Duplexes are prohibited." 18. , The applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Planning Department that the existing accessory structures located on proposed Lot 3 have been removed:prior to the filing of the final plat. If the structures are not removed, a primary useshall be established for each remaining structure on individual lots to recognize the- "sheds" as accessory structures. 19. The Owner shall negotiate with the Central Valley School District and submit a recorded copy of a voluntary agreement making provisions for public schools prior to finalizatiomand recording of this plat. The agreement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state'the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measures. The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement to purchase property within said plat pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (58.17.205), that adequate provisions for school facilities must be made conditioned ona future agreement between the plattor and school district. Voluntary agreements between the Owner and School District shall conform to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 82.02. 20. The Owner shall negotiate with the Spokane County Parks Department and submit a recorded copy of a voluntary agreement making provisions for public parks prior to finalization and recording of this plat. The agreement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measures. The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement to purchase property within said plat pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (58.17.205), that adequate provisions for parks must be made conditioned on a future agreement between the plattor and Spokane County Parks Department 3/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 64 -m Voluntary agreements,iietween the Owner and,Spokane-County_Parksaepartment shall, x;.:, conform to the.requirements ofahe_Revised.Code'of_Washington:Chapter:82:02"._ : " _ ._- SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS 1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. Plans, profiles, and cross -sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as -built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right-of-way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 6. All construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way is to be completed prior to filing each final plat, or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "as -built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 7. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the county road system. 8. Existing county roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to Spokane County standards. 9. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. 10. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns and successors. 11. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Local Access standard for the improvement of Montgomery Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 9-11 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing is also required. 3/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 65 • - 12. = The County Engineer -has designatedTypical:Readway-Section-Numtier Twoy a Local Access standard for the improvement of Long Road, which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition -of approximately 91iT feet of asphalt along the•frontage of the development. The construction of curbing is also required. 13. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended, which resolution establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction- 14. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing county road system warrants the dedication of additional right-of-way and the roadway improvements herein specified. 15. There may exist utilities, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane County assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. Applicant(s) should check with the applicable utility purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to determine whether applicant(s) or the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES' 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. . 2. The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94." 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 4. The dedication shall state: "Each new dwelling unit shall be double -plumbed for connection to future areawide collection systems." 3/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 66 ._ . - SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH 1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or - - any attached sheets as noted. 2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each tract of the plat. 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 10. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that a suitable sites for on -site sewage disposal systems are available on all lots. 11. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health officer, the use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems may be authorized. 3/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 67 s ..�_ _ -12: The dedicatory language of the plat will state:"Sublecrto specific apphcauon __..._ approval and issuance.ofpermits by the Health Officer,.the-userof:individual:onatte st_'. sewage systems may be authorized." 13. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 14. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant to the water plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building and Safety Department, and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." SPOKANE COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 1. This plat requires one new fire hydrant at the East end of the plat. You may install the hydrant on the South side of Montgomery Avenue where the existing water main lies. This hydrant needs to be installed prior to building on Lots 6, 7 and 8. SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1. All air pollution regulations must be met. 2. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, construction and excavation projects be controlled. This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads should be treated, and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be controlled, as well as emissions from all other construction -related activities. • 3. All traveled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) must be paved and kept clean. 4. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces. 5. Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than burning (i.e., construction waste, etc.). 6. All solid fuel burning devices (wood stoves, pellet stoves, etc.) must comply with local, state, and federal rules and regulations. 3/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 68 ¶E-1743-93 1 tr_ 0 J E V tr 17£.r73 174 175 .AVE.. 175 - 17 741178 BOONE rot?*- Gypsum Pont �q .(. : ALDWiN Cr OCC �x 0 -1 W a i > AUGUSTA 179 130 18' 182 183 184 185 186 m MAXWELL Av RP AVE. k 5503 EL:2000 4 0 cc 187 188 189 190 191 h-Greenocres Sc (Eleme$itary) 2/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 48 PE-1743-93 2/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 49 PE-1743-93 IIM :HMO 2/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 50 SCOTTISH ADDITION EV ED Lel 2 m c'T Et —h z CD 0 'S 0 • Z A ID W Z / I (0I / 8E-2:/6 r eeee r A- reAiC.- 3 030.// sm.e:/0. so' IN I1Z I_ .-.) I -it' Fl L _ I /50' R2 I '93/ I S. 873 I I I 265' 2B/ Soo 5 3/900¢8 95' .V V/I ,t7 le96.-53 '3 • YE CI-M./ _ La* l.' 95' M 5 ti N 23,750¢ • N 95 P,3 .573-93;N- G 5 75O� /0'vre/7T Esey r layer 59586 MO/VTGOME-er Are. - f:ERw^A.......± 9 /o- NiAr .N.N a3 //S. 7 s>SO //5 -5, 975 # P PROPOSED • PLAT LOCATED IN THE 3W.'/t OF Se 6 SECTION -Z. W.Y. SPOKANE COUNTY. WASHINGTON ' SRE'DATA SPONSOR NO. OF LOTS 6 AVERAGE SI2E 93/61 PLAT AREA 6. /9 0cs. UTILITIES a'.*,)6,Wt so s. JCF79C Tn vA'S/ e'rrbyo . recs. Lti-NN 6/EE.0 Ae AS09 Sem/n e/c Spot na Ab. 99749 (5so9) 466-090e DESCRIPTION hor B SR-83/-93• BE/,vC.. .-9 ae r/on/ at rRAC/3 R'/r.4 64eew4ca E3 2-4.e/64r/ON Din -Mier �.0 f,4r,7Ecoeaca /N yOL(/ME •E* Mac 2 /N SPO,NANE C06WT✓/(I,p3+ f %/5.89 " ' • /-7 50 7Z -92,,.3 Y/C/N/re 'M4P E.. scts) SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE DRS 0 10 CERTIFY THAT this PROPOSED FAT WO PREPARED BY u[ ER. 0JSrIG COUNTY RECORDS NO COO NOT REPRESENT f Me I � �. . tit.- I) =Ir Taylor Ennglineering.Innc. A• CI : D..Na .n4 I..E PL.Yy r . or rv.w E—.ww PYRRS (MO u.=A'...N.w I.W w-r. Or_I-,L. .n7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 1994 SUBJECT: PE-1743-93; PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SCOTTISH ADDITION WITH EXISTING URBAN RESIDENTIAL-3.5 (UR-3.5) ZONE AND WITHIN THE AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA (ASA) OVERLAY. ZONE I. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Dean Greer 9609 North Seminole Spokane, WA 99208 (509) 466-0908 Contact Planner: Stacy Bjordahl Location: Generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Long Road and Montgomery Avenue in the NE 1/4 of Section 7 , Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. Proposal: Preliminary Plat to subdivide approximately 6.19 acres into eight (8) lots for single family dwellings and those uses permitted in the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone. Background Information: There have been previous proposals to subdivide this property. The first action was an approved preliminary short plat (SP-577-89) which expired on July 1, 1992 as a result of the applicant's failure to finalize the plat. The subject property was also submitted as a preliminary plat of Golden Acres (PE-1661-92) in 1992, but was withdrawn by the applicant on July 23, 1992. The subject property was also submitted as Irish Estates (PE-1674-92) which was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on September 30, 1992 but denied upon appeal to the Board of County Commissioners on December 29, 1992. The Board's decision was further upheld upon appeal to Superior Court. Subsequent to the denial by Superior Court, the applicant submitted and finalized a two (2) lot short plat (SP-831-93) on the subject property. This preliminary plat proposal is a replat of Tract "B" of short plat 831-93. II. SITE INFORMATION A . Site Size: Approximately 6.19 acres Gross Density: 1.3 units per acre or approximately .77 acres per unit 2/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 • Page 52 B Comprehensive Plan 1. Land Use Plan: The property is located within the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The Urban category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of a "citylike" environment which includes various land uses and intensive residential development. Residential net densities in the Urban category should range between 1 and 17 units per acre. The proposed density of 1.13 units per acre for this proposal is in accord with the density range suggested by the Urban category. The Urban category recognizes the need for public facilities and services, including public water, sanitary and storm sewer lines, police and fire protection, and other services. The Board of County Commissioners have denied projects that lack these services and have considered "fill-in" developments. 2 . Arterial Road Plan: Long Road and Montgomery Avenue are designated by the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan as Local Access Streets with a recommended right of way width of 60 feet. The County Engineer is not requesting dedication or future acquisition area (FAA) for this proposal. 3 . County Parks Plan: The Spokane County Parks and Recreation Plan identifies Sullivan Park as the nearest park facility. Sullivan Park is located approximately 1.5 miles west of the site along Sullivan Road and the Spokane River. The Centennial Trail, which is owned and maintained by the Washington State Parks Department is located north of the proposal along the south bank of the Spokane River. C . Site Characteristics: The site fronts on Long Road and Montgomery Avenue which are both public streets without curb or sidewalk. The site is flat with three (3) accessory structures located in the southwest corner. The remaining property is vacant with deciduous trees, brush and shrubbery. D. Neighborhood Characteristics: Single family residences on Larger lots characterize the surrounding area. Large animal keeping may also be found in the area. The Spokane River and Centennial Trail are located approximately 1/4 mile north of the site. E. Zoning Analysis: Prior to the implementation of the Spokane County Zoning Code on January 1, 1991, the site and most of the surrounding area was zoned Agricultural (A). Pursuant to the implementation of the Zoning Code, the site and surrounding area was redesignated to Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5). Some of the uses permitted in the Agricultural (A) zone, including large animal keeping and agricultural pursuits, still exist in the area as nonconforming uses. Proposal: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously classified as Agricultural (A) (ZE-480-58) 2/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 53 North: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously classified as Agricultural (A) (ZE-480-58) South: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously classified as Agricultural (A) (ZE-286-57) Fast: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously classified as Agricultural (A) (ZE-480-58) West: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously classified as Agricultural (A) (7,F-480-58) F. Land Use Analysis: Land use in the area includes single family residences and some large animal keeping. The Spokane River is located north of the site and industrial uses are also located along the north bank of the river. Single family residences are located on lots ranging in size from approximately 12,000 square feet to 10 acres. Most residential development in the area has been accomplished through the short plat process including several short plats west of the site (SP-569-89; SP-728-91; SP-317-84) which created lots ranging from approximately 13,000 to 33,000 square feet in size. Fast of the site along Riverway Road, two short plats (SP-703-91; SP-522-87) were approved with lot sizes ranging from 30,000 square feet to 2 acres. The most recent short plat is located south of and adjacent to Montgomery Avenue and consists of three (3) 30,000 square feet lots (SP-721-92). The proposed subdivision is generally consistent with recent land use trends in the area. Site: Accessory structures and vacant land. North: Single family residences with accessory structures South: Single family residences with accessory structures East: Single family residences with accessory structures West: Single family residences with accessory structures G. Circulation: Long Road and Montgomery Avenue will provide direct access to all the lots within the subdivision. H. Design: The preliminary plat consists of eight (8) lots on 6.19 acres. The applicant has indicated that each lot is restricted to single family residences and duplexes are not permitted. Lot sizes range from 14,250 square feet to 1.19 acres. Three (3) accessory structures are illustrated on the preliminary plat, and will removed or relocated prior to fmali7ation of the plat. Each lot meets the minimum Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone development standards for lot size and road frontage. The preliminary plat does not illustrate any structure setbacks. Each lot shall demonstrate compliance with all structure setback requirements at time of building permit application. 2/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 54 I. Density: The net density is .77 acres per unit or approximately 1.3 units per acre. The proposed density is consistent with the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone and the density guidelines of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. J. Drainage: A drainage plan is required. This plan must be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer's Department prior to development K Power Transmission Lines/Other Known Easements: The preliminary plat illustrates several easements. A 20' x 20' utility easement is shown on proposed Lot 4 and an existing drainfield easement is shown on proposed Lot 3. A 10 foot wide utility easement is also shown along the frontage of all lots. Any additional or required easements will be disclosed during the final plat process. L. Water Supply: The proposal is within the Consolidated Irrigation Water District Provisions for water service shall be complied with prior to finalization of the plat. M. Sewage Disposal: Individual on -site sewage disposal systems will be utilized for sewage disposal as authorized by the Spokane County Health District. (Note: This proposal was accepted prior to January 1, 1994 and the implementation of the new state health regulations.) N . School: The proposal is in the Central Valley School District No. 356. The Central Valley School District has responded to the proposal and has indicated that existing facilities are inadequate to accommodate additional students generated from new residential developments. The school district has requested the applicant be required to reach a voluntary agreement to mitigate the impact of this proposal on the school district. This request is included as a recommended condition of approval. O . Fire Protection: The proposal is within Fire District No. 1 . The Fire District and the Division of Buildings Department (Fire Marshall) are required to approve fire protection provisions prior to finalizing the preliminary plat. P . Wetlands: Spokane County Wetland Inventory Maps do not indicate the presence of permanent or seasonal wetlands on the site. Q. Cultural Resources: None have been identified. R. Spokane County Department of Parks, Recreation and Fair: The Spokane County Department of Parks, Recreation and Fair has responded to the proposal and has indicated that existing facilities are inadequate to serve additional residential developments. The Parks Department requests that the project sponsor negotiate a voluntary agreement to mitigate the impact on park facilities and provide appropriate provisions for parks as required by Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 58.117.110. This request is included as a recommended condition of approval. S . Special Information: The subject property is Tract "B" of short plat 831-93. This subdivision would be considered a replat of said short plat. 2/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 55 III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the County Planning Department. The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other County policies and guidelines. The Planning Department has detemuned that "No probable significant adverse impacts" would result from the proposal being developed and has issued a Determination of Nonsignificp. e ("DNS"). The "DNS" was circulated to 12 other agencies of jurisdiction and other agencies/departments affected by the future development for review and comment. The "DNS" comment period ends February 22, 1994 and was advertised 15 calendar days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within 400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site. The Hearing Examiner may consider additional environmental related testimony at the public hearing. IV. PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION The proposed preliminary plat is generally consistent with the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone and implements the Goals, Objectives, and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. As designed, the lot sizes and density are generally compatible with existing residential uses in the area. However, recent Board of County Commissioner decisions have considered sewer availability and denied non "fill-in" proposals. The Planning Department recommends approval, as conditioned. V. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL i .. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant", which terms shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. ii. The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zones, as amended. 2. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. 3. The Planning Director/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 2/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 56 4. A final plat name/number shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name/number to be approved by the Planning Director/designee. 5. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. 6. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for three (3) years, specifically to March 1, 1997. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request approximately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 7. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 8. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 9. Three (3) current certificates of tide shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 10. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 11. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. 12. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building perm it due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 13. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision, and the 2/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 57 applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 14. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state -licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat," including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as -built" water system. 15. The Water Plan and the above four (4) conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director/designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 16. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 17. The dedicatory language of the plat shall contain the following statement: "Duplexes are prohibited." 18. The applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Planning Department that the existing accessory structures located on proposed Lot 3 have been removed prior to the filing of the final plat. If the structures are not removed, a primary use shall be established for each remaining structure on individual lots to recognize the "sheds" as accessory structures. 19. The Owner shall negotiate with the Central Valley School District and submit a recorded copy of a voluntary agreement making provisions for public schools prior to finalization and recording of this plat. The agreement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measures. The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement to purchase property within said plat pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (58.17.205), that adequate provisions for school facilities must be made conditioned on a future agreement between the plattor and school district. Voluntary agreements between the Owner and School District shall conform to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 82.02. 20. The Owner shall negotiate with the Spokane County Parks Department and submit a recorded copy of a voluntary agreement making provisions for public parks prior to finalization and recording of this plat. The agreement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measures. The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement to purchase property within said plat pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (58.17.205), that adequate provisions for parks must be made conditioned on a future agreement between the plattor and Spokane County Parks Department. 2/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 58 Voluntary agreements between the Owner and Spokane County Parks Department shall conform to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 82.02. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS 1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. Plans, profiles, and cross -sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of each final plat; mad plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as -built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right-of-way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 6. All construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way is to be completed prior to filing each final plat, or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "as -built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 7. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the county road system. 8. Existing county roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to Spokane County standards. 9. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. 10. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns and successors. 11. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Local Access standard for the improvement of Montgomery Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 9-11 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing is also required. 2/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 59 12. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, ' 1 neat Access standard for the improvement of Long Road, which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 9-11 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing is also required. 13. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended, which resolution establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 14. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing county mad system warrants the dedication of additional right-of-way and the roadway improvements herein specified. 15. There may exist utilities, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane County assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. Applicant(s) should check with the applicable utility purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to determine whether applicant(s) or the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District 2. The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94." 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 4. The dedication shall state: "Each new dwelling unit shall be double -plumbed for connection to future areawide collection systems." 2/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 60 SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any attached sheets as noted. 2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each tract of the plat. 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health • authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a. transparency suitable for reproduction. 9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 10. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that a suitable sites for on -site sewage disposal systems are available on all lots. 11. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health officer, the use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems may be authorized. 2/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 61 12. The dedicatory language of the plat will state: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on -site sewage systems may be authorized? 13. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 14. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: 'The public water system, pursuant to the water plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building and Safety Department, and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." SPOKANE COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 1. This plat requires one new fire hydrant at the East end of the plat. You may install the hydrant on the South side of Montgomery Avenue where the existing water main lies. This hydrant needs to be installed prior to building on Lots 6, 7 and 8. SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1. All air pollution regulations must be met. 2. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, construction and excavation projects be controlled. This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads should be treated, and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be controlled, as well as emissions from all other construction -related activities. 3. All traveled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) must be paved and kept clean. 4. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces. 5. Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than burning (i.e., construction waste, etc.). 6. All solid fuel burning devices (wood stoves, pellet stoves, etc.) must comply with local, state, and federal rules and regulations. 2/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1743-93 Page 62 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS" WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE FILE NUMBER(S): PE-1743-93 SCOTTISH ADDITION DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Preliminary plat to subdivide approximately 6.19 acres into 8 lots for single family dwellings and those uses allowed in the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone. APPLICANT: Dean Greer 9609 North Seminole Spokane, WA 99208 (509) 466-0908 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL Generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Long Road and Montgomery Avenue in Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is ma required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., February 22, 1994, if they are intended to alter the DNS. #############.################################################ RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: WALLIS D. HUBBARD, PLANNING DIRECTOR By: Stacy Bjordahl, Planner I Phone: (509) 456-2205 Address: Spokane County Planning Department West 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 . DATE ISSUED: 71(11) 97 , 1994 SIGNATURE:074a- �j(VAIL( COMiv1II IS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS ARE WELCOME AT I}IE HEARING. APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is the same asthe above project's appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project. This. appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the Planning Department to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal. This DNS was mailed to: 1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2. WA State Department of Health 3. Spokane County Health District 4. Spokane County Division of Engineering 5. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority 6. Spokane County Parks Department 7. Spokane County Boundary Review Board 8. WA State Department of Transportation 9. Spokane Transit Authority 10. Central Valley School District 11. Consolidated Irrigation District 12. Fire District No. 1 r� ..�.... .: Wei OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON March 14, 1994 TO: Spokane County Planning Department (Current Planning Administrator) FROM: Spokane County Engineers Department R, SUHJ: Subdivision Conditions, Name Scottish Estates Number PE 1743-93 re: Subdivisions The following "Conditions of Approval" for the above referenced subdivision are submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee for inclusion in the "Planning Report" and "Findings and Order" for the public hearing scheduled March 24, 1994. E 1 The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right -oaf -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. E 2 That plans, profiles and cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. E 3 That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. E 5 Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. page E 6 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public Right -of -Way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. E 7 All construction within the existing or proposed Public Right -of -Way .is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans and mon'-rmenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. E12 The applicant should be advised that individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. E16 Existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to Spokane County standards. E17 That all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. E19 The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns and successors. E24 The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Local Access standard for the improvement of Montgomery Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of 9-11 ft. of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing is also required. E24 The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Local Access standard for the improvement of Long, Road which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 9-11 ft. of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing is also required. E32 The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. page 3 E33 The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified. E90 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work, SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER INTRODUCTION RECEIVED FEB 2.5 1994 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER This matter has come before the Hearing Examiner Committee on February 24, 1994. The members,of the Committee present are: Lunen Haught, Chair, Jan Reuter and Frank Yuse. • PROPOSAL The sponsor, Dean Greer requests approval of PE-1743-93, Preliminary Plat of Scottish Addition to subdivide approximately 6.19 acres into 81ots for single family dwellings and those uses allowed in the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The property is generally located at the northeast comer of the intersection of Long Road and Montgomery Avenue in the NE 1/4 of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. 2. The Committee adopts the Planning Department Report as a part of this record. 3. At the public hearing, public testimony was presented that the required public notice was not adequate. After considering testimony presented, the Committee finds that adequate public notice was not provided and the proposal shall be continued to the next available hearing date to allow the applicant sufficient time to provide the required public notice. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON February 9, 1994 TO: Spokane County Planning Department (Current Planning Administrator) FROM: Spokane County Engineers DepartmentQ tA. SUBJ: Subdivision Conditions, Name Scottish Estates Number PE 1743-93 re: Subdivisions_ The following "Conditions of Approval" for the above referenced subdivision are submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee for inclusion in the "Planning Report" and "Findings and Order" for the public hearing scheduled February 24, 1994. E 1 The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. E 2 That plans, profiles and cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. E 3 That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. E 5 Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. page E E No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public Right -of -Way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. E 7 All construction within the existing or proposed Public Right -of -Way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cast of construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans and monurnenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. E12 The applicant should be advised that individual driveway access permits are required prier to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. EIS Existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to Spokane County standards. E17 That all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. E19 The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns and successors. E24 The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Local Access standard for the improvement of Montgomery Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of 9-11 ft. of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing is also required. E24 The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two„__Local Access standard for the improvement of Long_Road which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 9_11 ft. of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing is also required. E32 The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Beard of Commissioners Resolution ution No. 80-1592, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. page 3 E33 The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of additional Right of Nay and the roadway improvements herein ^ specified, E90 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work" OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON December 14, 1993 TO: Spokane County Planning Department (Current Planning Administrator) FROM: Spokane County Engineers Department earti SUC3J: Subdivision Conditions, Name Irish Estates Number Unassigned re: Subdivisions The following "Conditions of Approval" for the above referenced subdivision are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the Design Review Meeting scheduled December 22, 1993. E 1 The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in...the preliminary plat of record. E That plans, profiles and cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. E 3 That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. E 5 Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. page 2 E 6 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public Right -of -Way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. E 7 All construction within the existing or proposed Public Right -of -Way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans and mc'numenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. E12 The applicant should be advised that individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. E16 Existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to Spokane County standards. E17 That all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. E19 The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns and successors. E24 The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Twos Local Access standard for the improvement of M2ntgomery_Av_enue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of 9-11 ft. of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing is also required. E24 The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Local Access standard for the improvement of Long Read which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 9_11 ft. of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing is also required. E32 The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. page 3 E33 The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified. E90 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground c'r overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. °PAGE 1 °Road# Road Names °03069 MONTGOMERY AV °03070 MONTGOMERY AV 0 °03071 MONTGOMERY AV ° °03072 MONTGOMERY AV O 18 28° °03177 MONTGOMERY DR 00.000 BMP of road R 09 PAVED 40 9aeeeeddeeeeededeeeedeededeeeeedeeeeededeeeeddeeeeeeddedeeeddeeeeeeededeeeeeeeeef °List °Use Direction Keys to View Report (Press [F1] for help) ° Odaaaaaeaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa? °Esc -Exit Enter -Next Page 0 ....................................................ede.............eded..................................... eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee�Report Viewerueeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeei 15:37:50 10 DEC 1993 ° Road Log Info U 19 LIGHT BITUM BITUM BITUM BITUM BITUM BITUM, 20° 20 20° 20 20° 20 40° 40 40° 46 46° 44 44° 18 18° MPost. 00.000 00.060 00.000 00.060 00.100 00.160 00.000 00.060 00.170 00.240 00.310 00.560 00.810 00.000 00.510 00.740 Reference Descriptio BMP of road BRADLEY RD LILY RD GIRARD RD BOWMAN RD PARK RD BMP of road SARGENT RD MARGUERITE RD HUTCHINSON RD ARGONNE RD (TWO WAY LOCUST RD WOODRUFF RD FLORA RD LONG RD RIVERWAY RD °03227 MONTGOMERY AV CONN. 00.000 MONTGOMERY DR U 19 LIGHT U 19 LIGHT U 19 LIGHT U 19 LIGHT U 19 LIGHT U 19 PAVED U 19 PAVED U 19 PAVED U 16 PAVED U 16 PAVED U 16 PAVED U 16 PAVED U 19 LIGHT BITUM. U 19 LIGHT BITUM. U 19 LIGHT BITUM. U 19 PAVED iddedeedeedeededdedeededdeddededdcReport Vieweraddeddeddeddededdedddddeddeddedd. °PAGE 2 15:38:34 10 DEC 1993 ° °Road# Road Names MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info o 00.110 BOONE AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18° c 00.130 BOONE AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 00.280 MAXWELL AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18° o 00.370 MISSION AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 O 00.620 INDIANA AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18° o 00.870 MONTGOMERY. AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 00.970 RIVERWAY RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18° °02583 LONG RD 00.000 BMP of road R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 16 °02580 LONGFELLOW AV 00.000 BMP of road U 19 PAVED 36° o 00.020 MAYHEW RD U 19 PAVED 36 °02585 LONGFELLOW AV 00.000 ELTON RD U 19 PAVED 40° ° 00.080 DICK RD °02586 LONGFELLOW AV 00.000 MARGUERITE RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 16° ° 00.120 ARGONNE RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 16 °02587 LONGFELLOW AV 00.000 BMP of road U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20° o 00.050 ELLEN RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 O 00.100 CALVIN RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20° 0 • 00.140 WARREN RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .....................................................................ddededed ....wide.. .eededode...ddeddedd .... . eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef °List 0 °Use Direction Keys to View Report (Press [F1] for help) 0 Oaaaaaaeaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa? °Esc -Exit Enter -Next Page DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS" WAC 197-11-970.and Section 11.10.230(3) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE RECEIVED MAR 0 4 1994 Polowt COUNTY ENGINEER FILE NUMBER(S): PE-1743-93 S CO I IISH ADDITION DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Preliminary plat to subdivide approximately 6.19 acres into 8 lots for single family dwellings and those uses allowed in the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone. APPLICANT: Dean Greer 9609 North Seminole Spokane, WA 99208 (509) 466-0908 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL Generally located at the northeast comer of the intersection of Long Road and Montgomery Avenue in Section 7, Township 25 North; Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is aia required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review'of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later than 4:00 pan., March 22, 1994, if they are intended to alter the DNS. ############################################################# RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: WALLIS D. HUBBARD, PLANNING DIRECTOR By: Phone: Address: Stacy Bjordahl, Planner I (509) 456-2205 Spokane County Planning Department West 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 DATE ISSUED: L/YWith 4 , 1994 SIGNATURE: COMMENTS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS ARE WELCOME HEARING. APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOKANE.COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is the same as the above project's appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the Planning Department to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal This DNS was mailed to: 1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2. WA State Department of Health 3. Spokane County Health District r4=Spokane:County_Diyision_of Engineeringn 5. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority 6. Spokane County Parks Department 7. Spokane County Boundary Review Board 8. WA State Department of Transportation 9. Spokane Transit Authority 10. Central Valley School District 11. Consolidated Irrigation District 12. Fire District No. 1 5.1D 8.-2.' nen c Z/9c r 3 / s- 2, 2 / G.'7 r'C,t' T.?/ C 7 I i I.... .Iao•I I; IZ I� I I I° I'\ Scale : /v.•SO. 630, // SCOTTISH ADDITION NKr Et J A _L 285 / 23 soot 295 2. 2.9,50o r »5 /90 3 /9 coo d' L — /Oo' 05' eASEAI ENT • 5. '?.83/-53 • h 95' /4, 260 zo'rtn. USA en1r 55 5 10 NI 23,7E04. //5 -I 5,750 4 . 93 //5 7 s, 7so¢ //5. 8 S 973 i. PROPOSED • PLAT LOCATED IN THE 5.l$7 or/Z5/d SECTgH? i.Z2 N.. R. C.. W.Y. SPOKAIE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ' SITE' DATA NO. OF LOTS 8 AVERAGE SIZE 33684 PLAT AREA 6. /3 ocs. UTILITIES ✓/ E'.e cre s,, . Tr<E. SPONSOR LLAN SeSer.e N 9309 SE.n,n e/ Li,00r ne &b. ?flea (5Y) 966-o?o, DESCRIPTION Lor 6) .5-,R- SE/.vO.• . .,9 Po.2T/o / OF 7WAOTs 6,CECNA6,eE6 SR.e/6Ar/ON O1Sr4vc77 /EC PCAr,cecoxnco /N yaLI/ME "El P46 E 2/, /N SPOA'ANE Co044/r✓ 4444544 --{951 i --95-- <— //5 --_-- //S. --- %/5. 85L_ I vy, 535. 86 — — /iJ0/✓TGOME.2YAyE N Itrerae jive H h. C.s-.../.. wW..n7i,n I. I I I E 9 S; & 3o '3 T— —T L /7 .5 in /Z/-92'3 - 'V/C/N/Tr' 'MAP Cw SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE Txu Is TO CwnrY TNT 011s PROPOSED NAT WAS PPEPMro 4? uE r RESTING CWMW RECORDS MO COD NOT REPRESENT Irla a j IL'.: a Y • @ i _Iv Taylor Engineering; Inc. S t CI : ..Y.E.wa IM4pke.1y . • b rov Iw+l UO-'m1"pW�na Dap SS 1 LENVIIRONMIWIFAI, CH2CE.1137 SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230 [1] PE-1743-93 r NAG 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE l Environmental Checklist F11e No. Purpose of Checklist: The State Enviroreental Policy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RCN, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental impact Statement (E15) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on D///� the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal land to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe same basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or If a question does not apply to your proposal, write 'do not know' or 'does not apply.' Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as toning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the govermental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you clan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional Information that will describe your proposal or Its environmental effects. the agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional lnfonaation reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered 'does not apply'. IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NOIPROJECT ACTIONSIPart D). For nonproject actions, the references to the checklist to the wards 'project,' 'applicant,' and 'property or site' should be read as 'proposal,' 'proposer,' and 'affected geographic area.' respectively. A. BACKGROUND / /'� 1. .Name of proposed project. If applicable: �l,V r -1 l c 971 T G-C) 2. Name of Applicant: Dean Greer 3. Address and phone number of applicant or contact person Larry Leinweber c/o Taylor Engineering, Inc. West 106 Mission, Spokane, Washington 99201 Date checklist prepared: November 1993 Agency requesting checklist: Spokane County, WA 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Preliminary Plat Approval Spring 1993 7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain._ None b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, explain. List any environmental Information ou know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared. directly related to this proposal None / ((h MM V1 i2{ Q UkMd i I Si 1 ti)u S 7pP,✓ w Uq p� fX[ Fu✓ Su.hlr=c� �Y1001e2/1.1 GM ft\y‘ tn(rh �{ (Jiin � Tin Rev.2/1/88 1 P E - 17 313 SPOWIB ENVIRONNENIAL ORDINANCE (VAC 197-11-960) Section 11.1O.230(1) .. A. BACKGROUND (continued) Do you know whether application* are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the propertycovered by you proposal? If yes, explain. None 1O. List any government approvals or permits that vi11 be needed for your proposal. 1f known. Preliminary and Final Plat approval, Building and Construction permits, Water and Health Department permits. II. Give a brief. complete description of your proposal. including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There ere several questions biter in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on[his page. UR 3 5 to permit 8 single family residential lots on 6.19 acres. 12location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to underaund the precise location of your proposed project, Including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if 'known. If a proposal would occur ov r a range.of area provide the range or boundaries of the slte(a). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity nap, and topographic map, If reasonably aval fable. 'While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate ups or detailed plant submitted with any perm][ application related to this checklist. The site is located at the Northeast corner of Long Road and Montgomery Ave. N.E. 1/4 Section 7-25-45, E. 17907 Montgomery Avenue 99016 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sower Service Area? The Priority Sewer Service Area' Che City of Spokane? (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay Zone Atlas for boundaries). ASA. PSSA 70 BE COMPLETED By APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL a.Cl4NIS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one) other: oiling, hilly. steep slopes, mountainous, b. That Is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 2% That general types of soils • e found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat. muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. GgA- Garrison gravelly loam - d. Are there surface indications or history of une table soils in the Imediete vicinity, If so, describe. No Evaluation For Agency Use Only 2 P E -174313 SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-1i-960) Section 11.10.230(1) ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS(continued) Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Typical grading for driveways and home construction. Utility construction. All grading will be kept to minimum. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Minor wind and water erosion. 9. about what percent of the site will be covered with Impervious surfaces after project construc- tion (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 10 - 15% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Minimizing cut and fill, soil stabilization with vegetation, landscaping, watering exposed soil during construction. 2. AIR What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust. automobile. odors industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project Is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantites If known. Vehicular emissions associated with building construction, auto emissions, dust from construction. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other Impacts to air, If any: Limit home construction to daylight hours to reduce impacts, watering soil during construction. 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No (2) 'Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters?. If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No Evaluation For Agency Use Only, 3 r PE-174313 SpOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (UAL 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENV1RON?ENILL ELLHEI'S (continued) (3) Estimate the amount of fi11 end dredge material that would be placed in or ved from the surface water or wetlands and Indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of f111 material. None (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give a general descrip- tion. purpose. and approximate quantities, if known. No (5) Does the proposal lie within a I00-year flood plain' If so, note location on the site plan. No (6) roes the proposal involve any discharge. of waste materials to midget eaters? If so, describe the type of vote and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: (1) 'Jill groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description. purpose, and approximate quantities, If known. No groundwater will be withdrawn. Surface water will be discharged into groundwater via natural drainage. (2) Deacr ibe waste materiel that will be discharged into the ground from septic tan). or other •nitary waste Li -cement facility. Describe the general sloe of the system, the number of . houses to beserved (If apyllcabl.) or the number of p.r.ons the syete.(.) are expected to 8 new homes to be served by individual sewage waste disposal systems. Expected to serve 24 persons. (2) Describe any systems, other than those deelgnsd for the disposal of sanitary waste, boats lled for the purpose of discharging fluid, below the ground surface (Includes .ystms such s those for the disposal of storm water or drainage frees floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of materl.l to be disposed of through the eyetem and the types of aterl.ls likely to be disposed of (including materials which say eater the system inadvertently through spills or as . result of firefighting .ctivitlu). None (4) will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above- ground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of materials will bestored? No 4 Evaluation For Agency 0ee Only PE a11431 3 SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL. ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10. 230(1) B. ENVIRONMENTAL EISWIT5 (continued) Evaluation For Agency Use only (5) Whet protective measures w111 be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals scored orused onsite will not be alloyed to percolate to groundwater (this includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal emcees described 1n 36(2) and 3b(3)? No chemicals will be stored outdoors. Any inadvertent interior spillage will be disposed of in an environmentally safe manner. Wter Runoff (including atom water): (1) Describe the scommie of runoff (including @tom water) and method of coll.ction and dl.powl If any (include quanttttes, if known). Where will this water flow? Will thla utter floe into other waters? If so, describe. Stormwater Runoff. Storm drainage will be handled by naturalpercolation or carried above around to dry wells. Per Spokane County "208" standards (2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or sed on the site in • location where • spilt or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to • storm water disposal system dl.charging to surface or groundwater? No (1) Could vote mteriala enter ground or surface waters? I1 so, generally describe. No Proposed measures to reduce or control . , ground, and runoff water impact., if any (if the proposed action lies withinthe AquiferSensitive Arm be especially clear on explanations relating to (ecilitisa concerning Section. 36(4), 31(5), and Ic(2) of this checkll.t): Landscaping, soil stabilization, systems as outlined above. 1. PLANTS a. Check or circle type of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other. X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other. X shrub.. X gra., palate. crop or grain. t soil plants, cattail, buttercup, bullru.h, skunk cabbage, other. ter plants: water Ilily, eelgrese, m11fo11, other. ocher types of vegetation. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Native grasses c List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other mounds to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Larger trees will be preserved. Ornamental residential landscaping will replace native grasses.. s F PEi74313. i • (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, other Upland game birds mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon. trout, herring, shellfish, other: other: rodents, tree squirrels List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None A. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric. natural gas, wood stove. solar) w111 be used to meet the the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufac- turing. etc. Electricity will be the primary energy source. Heating and cooling will be the principal use of energy. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No What kinds of energy conservation features are included In the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, If any: The development will conform to all Northwest Energy code requirement. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None Evaluation For Agency Use Only 6 PE - 17431a ' SPORANE ENVIROIC6URAL ORDINANCE (uAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.2)0(1) N. E4vIRONHERIAL morns (continued) EIrv1RONnzirAL HEALTH (continued) (2) Proposed oes ores to reduce or control environmental health hazards, 1f any: N/A b. Noise: (1) What types of noise exist to the area which may affect your prole ct (for example: trsff ic. equipment, operstlon. other' Vehicular noises from adjacent streets and residents. (2) What typo and levels of noise would be crated by or ociated with the project on short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traf fie, construction, ape ration, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term noises associated with construction and long term residential noises. (I) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise lapses, if any: Construction will be limited to daylight hours. 8, LA!7D AND SHORELI'R USE Vacant a. What Is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Adjacent uses are residential. Ilse the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Possibly. Dry land farming. c. Describe any structures on the mite. Miscellaneous sheds d. Will any structures he demolished? If so, which? Older sheds e. what is the current zoning classification of the site/ UR 3-5 f. ?chat is the current cmprehealwe plan deslgnetion of the ate? Urban g. If applicable, what 1s tM current shoreline caster program designation of the mite? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an snviromentally sensitive" area? If so, •peel fy. No 1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 24 Abu. v� jzt51 n10,tt yJ �. S (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) E. !RVIRONl2RTLL ELDICIPIS (continued) SPOKANE IIIRIROmultrAL ORDINANCE j Approximately how luny people would the completed project displace? None Proposed 'enures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A Proposed lua s to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing end projected land uses and plans. if ensure The proposal conforms to existing zoning and land use plans. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many unite would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high-. .lddle-, or low -Income housing. 8 middle -income single family dwellings. b. Approximately how luny units, 1f any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high-, middle-, or low -Income housing. None c. Proposed =assures to reduce or control housing impact., if any: N/A 10. AESTIIEICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed etructure(s), not including enema! W.t le ohs principal exterior building mterlal( a) proposed? Buildings will not exceed 35 feet in height.. The principal building materials are expected to be wood and masonry. b. Must views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed aearure to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Residential landscaping 11. LICK AND GLARE e. That type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day mould it vainly occur. Residential lighting at night. Could light or glare tram the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere vlth views/ No c. What existing off -site source of light or glare say affect your proposal? Headlights from streets and adjacent residences. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare iapacte, if any: None veluation For Agency Use Only P E -\1174 3 -93 3 (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.220(1) SPOZANE EIPVIRONl6MAL ORDINANCE B. ERVIR0m4ZWTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation For _ Agency Use Onl 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Walking, logging, biking, tennis b. Mould the proposed project displace any existing recrmational uses. If so, describe. • No c. Proposed ueasures to reduce or control impacts onrecreation, Incudl t¢utlanal tuns- ///�� /y /� �. (Tired reed pots 1iincluding oPPor 9I• I,(6L1,(� 1 MVt uI tie. to be Provided y the project or .pputnt,u any: lilt (, J None VEZ(w.e44 h GO I+1A Co , to (hqa.!-e preie rve- PO 4 hr P ,�u�a e-t s 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed onr proposed for national, state r local tlon registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No Genera lly descri he any lsndma roe or evidence of historic Arc he<o log i c sl, sc ie ntifl c or cultural Importance known CO be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public .t ree1e and hi ghmays • rving the site sod describe proposed ¢cue to the existing street lystm. Sharon site plans, if any. 8 lots served by private driveways to Long Road and Montgomery Ave. Barker Road .5 mile to East.. b. la site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nm rest transit stops _ .5 mile to Barker Road. c. now many parking .paces would the completed project lure? Ibw many would the project eliminate No public parking cc gpat-c-es G(- . f t d. 4111 the proposal require soy new roads or stresta, or impm.emnts toexisting coeds or .cant. - ^rt� y'/.(,(�V/t` Gti�� not inc luA l r4 driveways? If so, generally dsscriM (Iodlut whether public or private). Ild� try` )r� �^ No fl�y�C -�. rek,AA CAVICCW lH e. Mill the project use (or occur in the Svdists vicinity of) water, rail, or air tranaportrtion? If so, generally describe. No 9 P E ii4313 1 SPORANE mVIaORawrst ORDINANCE (VAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.23O(1) B. ENVIP.ONe®N!AL ELEMENTS (continued) Hoy many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project' If know, indicate when peak would occur. Approximately 80 trips per day with peaks occurring 7:00 -.9:00 a.m. and 4:00 - 6:00 p.m. g. Proposed emotes to reduce or control transportation S.pnu. if any: None 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. 'Would the project result in .n locressed need for public service. (for era.ple, f pro cect ion, police protection, health Can, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No increased neefor public services will be required for 8 new residences. Services already existing. b. Proposed .enures to reduce or control direct impact• on public services, if eny: None 16. CILITIES a C le u t11 t les currently ailsble •t the site: natuul 8ss, •ter refmss e rvlc ce lephonfinavIt fly sere r, Cep tic sYstem,lll e - . All utilities circled are available adjacent to site or can be installed. Describe the utilities that • e proposed for the project, the utility providing the .•rvtce and the general construction activities on the site or in the Ia.edtate vicinity which sight De needed. All utilities circled above wi71 require connection. C. SICNATURE Evaluation For Agency Use Only 1 rA PrcY5 JLI S p 1 tZ� �( r A t Lux- S �cV v\ a pp 1 I coon 1— rvvict' V e Oi tot e.(k toihi SLR U (ttlr[+ to A t d t d't- pc i-c-A ll ct-D Ll 5 1, the undersigned, twar under the penalty of perjury Out the .bore rupos.. •re made truthfully end to the best of my knowledge. 1 also understand that, should there be any willful el.repr. entation or willful lack of full disclosure an .y part, the asency may withdraw .ny determination of none ignl f Jeanne that it eight issue in reliance upon Otis checklist. Date. Phone: /2. - C/3 (B ti-ag J Person completing form: //JJ . -A C.,-)�F/&C (C Phone: 3 74 - ZY/ 5- Proponent FOR STAFF USE ONLY Staff .omber(e) reviewing checklist: /J t' --' ✓ 1 Address: /(/. C7 s�/////Vd Le 5/7gyz ,ti Z;(14 79z, sv l E/AituE/Ze,7Z ate: Based on this staff review of the environmental checkl1it and other pertinent Information, the staff: �2-6-5'3 Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse Impacts and recm.nde a determination of nonslgnlficance. Concludes that probable elgniflcsnt adverse environmental S.p¢[e do grist for the currant proposal and recommends • mitigated deter- mination of nonalgnlflc.nce with conditions. Concludes that there are probable significant .dverse environmental impacts and recommends a determination of significance. TILING Fs - $75.00 10 PE-1143-93 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING . PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PART I GENERAL INFORMATION; NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: (7)oy CITY: s16r/49tiE MAILING ADDRESS: A 6)2EE L� ZIP: 997-0 FY PHONE: 466 "0 9"o /' (work) (home) STATE: Wj`f II? APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INNCLUDE WREI7EN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: S9MG' -IX /I Z50 Ve PHONE: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: — ZIP: PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) /p,/% c7C 5 ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) ASSESSOR PARCEL YS OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 5567/- 0/06 ASSESSOR PARCEL n'S OF ADJACENT AREA. OWNED OR CONTROLLED /1/ STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL C -- / 7 5'07 tJr,n/r HG2Y EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) (/,e EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY te_CA1L.% COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY SCHOOL DISTRICT FIRE DISTRICT /f✓�• (EAAtee7L U/JC.LE ` / WATER PURVEYOR Oak) 2)(�/ lift T& D PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Single family dwellings Duplexes ( ) Multifamily dwellings ( ) Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed Usc ( ) Other ( ) - Describe: LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT AL [IONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY: e Y3/-9 3 gee._ 3 tie-16741-g12 DENIED )Z1t.JQ.2 B LEGAL TNPORMATTON• LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: L(i�.tZ/ti/- (04/6- K2b—_ .9o/ ij y Ave SECTION 7 � 5 4 5'-�o���,�NSHIP � RANGE NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: A-ciAJCit. `}•O, c OI�o M 'C,-o KY) Fray Au t. WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL ( 'E.S ( ) NO NAME(S) OF AR I ERIAL ROADS \34fef26 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description stamped by Land Surveyor). INCLUDE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ENTIRE AREA TO BE SUBDIVIDED ON PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP. S7 .g �. y, � c 27 Z / Rri - J /fly I`°n 3 a1 u SUBDIVISION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4 IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO PROPERT)T, WHAT IS YOUR IN IEREST IN IT? WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS PROPOSAL WARRANTED? CIR3AA) • WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES? NO/vF WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE SUBDIVISION? /� I7 �� S� LOTS WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON SURROUNDING LAND USE? AJO tiJ F C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION GENERAL TNEORMATTON. NUMBER OF LOTS: (8 ���Jffyjj GROSS AREA: 6 - / 9 7 TYPICAL LOTS 1E: �� PROPOSED NET DENSITY*: o < 7 SMALLEST LOT SIZE- A/f Z O MINIMUM FRONTAGE: PROPOSED SOURCE OF WA 1 ER: Individual wells ( ) Public system Private Community System ( ) Other () - Describe: PROPOSED MEANS OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: Public sewer ( ) . Community system ( ) Septic tank and drainfield k Double Plumbing ( ) Dry Sewer' ( ) Other ( ) Describe: 9s , UTILITY COMPANIES AND/OR DISTRICTS TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO THIS PROPOSAL: Electricity: Sewer: /j./f% Gas: G[JGUp Water: AN_SaCI 6,9%F.0 Phone: e4-51 !/eSj DO YOU, OR THE OWNER IN THE EVENT YOU DO NOT OWN THIS PROPERTY, HAVE ANY PLANS FOR FUTURE ADDITIONS, EXPANSIONS OR FURTHER ACTIVITY RELATED TO THIS PROPOSAL? Yes ( ) No IF YES; EXPLAIN: D. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION; LEVEL OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED: Private roads O Public roads ( ) Arterial roads ( ) Tract X roads ( ) DESCRIBE ALNY COMBINATTON OF ABOVE: &//c-r PugL/C. ESTIMATED TIME PERIOD EXPECTED FOR COM )PI.ETF. DEN .OPMENT OF THE SU PDTVISICN: IS PHASING OF THE FINALIZATION OF THE SUBDIVISION PROPOSED? Yes ( ) No TF YES, SHOW PHASING ON THE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP. IS DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC USE CONTEMPLATED (Parks, schools, etc.)? Yes O No/X IF YES. DESCRII3E: * NET DENSITY IS UNITS OR LOTS PER ACRE MINUS PRIVATE AND/OR PUBLIC ROAD AREA P E 1743 • SUBDIVISION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4 PART II THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH . WRITTEN VERIFICATION.THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT / A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO.. B., ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (I WI') (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES. C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TIME. D. REQUIREMENTS ENCLUDE: ScFP0 4--( FIRE DISTRICT' SIGNATURP� 2f-93 DATE . WATER PURVEYOR SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FO DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS (HAVE) • AVF NOT) ) BEEN MADE. B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS: /,(/�4Tg,. AL'? «Ut //la C,-rso7VA, o - z ,1, WATER DIS I RIC.I SIGNAT RE/TITLE ////Yh9 3 DATE • COUNTY ENGINEER A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT. COMMENTS: / SIGNATURE 91 LE 1 o/,EG 73 DATE COUNTY UTILITIES A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE 1S A. COMMENTS: & .4 eI 7 CO SIGNATURE/TXE DATE 11EALTII DISTRICT A PRELIM NARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLAC SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) A. COmMENTs: ✓J ERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR BEEN SATISFIED. ) �(..)47—s,A 2.5. 12 iiP� SIGNATURE/T1TL - A 'E SEWER PURVEYOR A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD $Y TEE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE . E 1743 SUBDIVISION APPLICATION • Page 4 of 4 PART III SURVEYOR 'VERIFICATION I, TIE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLE I ED THE INFORMATION REQUESTED. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PRELIMINARY PLAT HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING/SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. SIGNED: ,Gf170�,07�� G� /�i rit✓ DATE: // s2 �f -73 ADDRESS: 4), /a6 /5-s-74 1 7zigo6 PHONE: 3;2' -caYS S/aCSAIE- 6,4/4 ZIP: 9I9z4/ PART IV" (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LE 1 1 ER OF AUTHORIZATION) 1, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. • I FURTHER SWEAR THAT 1 AM THE OWNER OP RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH 1S WRITTEN PERMISSION FRO THE, ER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. SIGNED: /yn DATE: ADDRESS: A% 9/ o 9 5E44/A;a5 PHONE: ZIP: c() CAW 2 Ct)Fl y � LL��ffq11//-30- 23( aJ 97 -o - SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE S"TAIE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE SIGNED AND SWORN TO/AFFIRMED BEFORE :ME ON THIS 347IN DAY OF Ate veltyr% 1993, BY -NOTARY SEAL n Qat\ Y?Pr Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing al: S� Ca -- My appointment expires: 52 PART V (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) DATE SUBMI I I ED: I2/ao /9 3 DATE ACCEPTED: 1a13043 FILE 8: Ft-7Na -r3 BY: TOTAL FEES: ' RECEIP goo? r E '3PA December 22, 1993, at 1:15 p.m. Irish Estates Preliminary Plat Generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Long Road and Montgomery Avenue in Section 7, Township 25 N., Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban, and within Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONING: Urban Residential - 3.5 (UR - 3.5) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Preliminary Plat to divide approximately 6.19 acres into 8 lots for single family dwelling and those uses allowed in the existing Urban Residential - 3.5 (UR - 3.5) Zone. PARCEL NUMBER: 55071.0106 SITE SIZF: Approximately 6.19 acres APPLICANT: Dean Greer 9609 N. Seminole Spokane, WA 99208 (509) 466-0908 AGENT: Larry Leinweber, c/o Taylor Engineers 106 W. Mission Ave. #206 Spokane, WA 99201 (509) 326-2415 ASSIGNED PLANNER: Stacy Bjordahl wtc-Greer-December 7, 1993 S pox: A N H PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO: Atyrl�lw,NT"�.. MEMORANDUM C O u N T Y WALLIS D. HUBBARD, DIRECTOR Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering Jim Red, Spokane County Utilities Department Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department Ted Trepanier, Department of Transportation Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board Central Valley School District No. 356 Consolidated Irrigation District Fire Protection District No. 1 FROM: John W. Pederson, Senior Planner'ty DATE: December 8, 1993 RE: Preliminary Plat of Irish Estates with existing Urban Residential - 3.5 (UR - 3.5) Zone APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING DECEMBER 22. 1993 AT 1:15 D.in• COUNTY PLANNING CONFERENCE ROOM. 2ND FLOOR Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Planning Department encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the attached form to Stacy Bjordahl for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Planning Department file (so bring three copies to the meeting). Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact Stacy Bjordahl of the Planning Department at 456-2205. c: Dean Greer, 9609 N. Seminole, Spokane, WA 99208 Larry Leinweber, Taylor Engineering, 106 W. Mission, #206, Spokane, WA 99201 Attachments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, Project Design, Site Plan wtc-Greer-December 7,1993 WEST1026 BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0240 • (509) 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PART I GENERAL INFORMATION: pSA G2E6 NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: MAILING ADDRESS: /U , q6 0 9 �/ STATE: (X�, . ZIP: 97zo X CITY: PHONE: 466 -6 9"o // (work) (home) IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: PHONE: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) ./9ac5 ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 557)7/- O/O� ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED if//f -- STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) ce ' S EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY 6/6C4t1/T� COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY SCHOOL DISTRICT FIRE DISTRICT (eAf%.QQL C4 ?te WATER PURVEYOR ( iU co/ApAT� Ci PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Single family dwellings Duplexes ( ) Multifamily dwellings ( ) Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( ) Other ( ) - Describe: LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY: Y3/-93 gam. J e-16741-n DENIED B LEGAL INFORMATION: /�/ LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: /V! //V lild/1�!6 - GO4u6- K b 0/�� c2c y Ace SECTION 7 TOWNSHIP ..25— RANGE ' NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: /_nFUG 071OM M7-0rmt=sy WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: EJ3fo DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL (X'ES ( ) NO NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS BA-1 Ke-IC-- LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description stamped by Land Surveyor). INCLUDE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ENTIRE AREA TO BE SUBDIVIDED ON PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP. / ' SUBDIVISION APPLICATION J Page 3 of 4 PART II THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORAI ED IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT / A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. / B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (H ) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES. C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: 713 • OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TIME. D. REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: SCFPO ter' FIRE DISTRICT SIUGNA URE/Ir DATE WATER PURVEYOR SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FO STIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS (HAVE) VE NOT BEEN MADE/.. B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS: 4/4GC/fiI? I& M c!/i /�e i e Cy/ so%da{�.� /r1./,ed:/f<, ///z03 WATER DISTRICT SIGNAT E/IITLE DAIL COUNTY ENGINEER A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: g/p 7;; DATE / COUNTY UTILITIES A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS A. COMMENTS: SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE HEALTH DISTRICT A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. COMMENTS: SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE SEWER PURVEYOR A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE RMIT CENTER PASSPORT Date: • 02/0/93 Name Address (i. Sfrild Number: 7/ Phone Comments: BUILDING Department:: Addressing Building Permit Code Information Commercial Review ElConference nEnergy Code Info Fire Safety Review Manufactured Horne Mechanical Permits Other Permits Plumbing Permits Private Road Info nResidential Review Sewer Permits n n Reviewer Time out CUSTOMER ROUTING :PLANNING;Department LJ Admin. Exception nArterial Rd Plan Info Binding Site Plan Info nCert. of Exemption Comprehensive Plan nCond. Use Permit nNonconfomting Use Pemrit Review Shorelines Info Short Plat Info n Subdivision Info Temp. Use Permit Variance Appl. Zone Check Zone Info NO FEE REQUIRED Reviewer Time out Reviewer ENGINEERS Department:::: nApproach Permit Flood Plain Permit Public/Private Roads nRes. Bldg Permit Rev. nSite Drainage Info LON&Ha Litt 2 Subdivision Review / Sliar( G/4-/ n Utility Permit Zone Change Review APA Payment Cert. of Exemption Subdivision Review nULID/Sewer Info nZone Change Review NO PEE REQUIRED Time out • MASTERV'ASSPORI .CTR 2/18N3 RECEIPT SUMMARY TRANSACTION NUMBER: T9302248 APPLICANT: GREER CONSTRUCTION I ADDRESS: 9609 N SEMINOLE SPOKANE WA 99208 RECEIVECI ULU0e1993_ DATE: 12/01/93 PHONE= 509 466 0908 Coin➢ Engineering CONTACT NAME: DEAN GREER PHONE= 509 466 0908 TRANSACTION: PRELIMINARY LONG PLAT DOCUMENT ID: 1) 2) 4) 5) COMMENTS: IRISH ESTATES FEE & PAYMENT SUMMARY ITEM DESCRIPTION PRELIMINARY PLATS - LONG 3) 6) QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT 1 200.00 TOTAL DUE = 200.00 TOTAL PAID= 200.00 BALANCE OWING= .00 PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# .- PAYMENT AMOUNT 12/01/93 00013518 8011 200.00 PROCESSED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA PRINTED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA ******************************** THANK YOU ************************************ NAME S- VI.?43 'COI -risk Pcoy NO. FLAT STATISTICS DATE Plat Check Pee ' — 1 Fs - 5 fees } ikci (2.--P CrIQ Number of Lots Road Miles (New) A - Total Area /`J '1 i lV�{ "rs MAP North Arrow c i. Scale is Legend ii Procedures & Equipment Basis of Bearings ,, IC)'1 K P c- . Re tj c-e Plat Location I3y Title [ Official Signature Blocks Surveyors Certificate Road Names )c(54-4 fit c Road Widths Adjacent Area Lot & Block Numbers 12/W Dedication designated /V f '7 1 Stress /( t 3 RPS on GI.O Corners J/I///��I�— Tract X // /�( ��j(C� Lot Areas / Bench Mark Closure tee 9-9-6-14- _ 1 "�� Scic?nvrH DEDICATION Description (To Map) 0— Description (To Cert) r Owners r Certificate to Plat Al-,--911- t - 2 0 -7 4 1 Foot Strips A J/A RID - CPR Statement Access Prohibited Al 12/W Dedication !V Drainage Language $ G h e r I, Nw, 1 irker-- Flood Insurance v/4 Stormwater Management /( 208 Bonds - $1,000.00 ea 208 PLANS APPROVED/0/0/ -%ef Private Road Doc. #'s Private Road Warning /VA Road Plans Ny—D /C- (-cf /' Bond Road Impro Aii*,•-- ll �a) p 013 lc? 4- Signed By Engineer � -kJ 810—h1 W,\eN TaN /0--a/_11 C ie or 4JPd v !1 f 5/�7.f%rri8SeDN /4- k'\t\planist.ck `7V3 Sash Awn. ,,- September 20, 1995 Dean Greer Construction N. 9609 Seminole Spokane, WA 99208 Dear Dean& This letter will confirm our conversation regarding the perpetual easement (20 feet x 20 feet) on Lot 4 of Scottish Addition. The easement was obtained by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation for the maintenance of an irrigation water service. The irrigation service is no longer in use and the easement is not required. Our District has no objection if you install a driveway aver the present easement if the water service is relocated. We anticipate that when a domestic water service is installed for your new home, the water service can be relocated out of the driveway area. Sincer obert 0- AshcrSft Manager ROA:sik CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 120 NORTH GREENACRES ROAD • GREENACRES, WASHINGTON 99016 • 924-3655 Office of the County Engineer Spokane County, Washington 6 September 1994 To: T•lcic?ti4 From: Development Engineering Services RE: Scottish Addition Drainage Language of Plat Dedication & Covenants Spokane County No. P-1743 Plat Dedication Drainage easements, as platted and shown hereon, which are for the purposes of installing, operating and maintaining drainage ponds and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted to Spokane County and the public. The property owners within this plat shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface path of natural or man-made drainage flow over and across their respective properties. The property owners within this plat shall maintain all water quality swales ("208" swales) and drainage ditches situated on their respective properties, and any portion of a 208 Swale situated in the public right-of-way adjacent to their respective properties, with a permanent ground cover as specified on the current approved plans on file at the County Engineer's Office. The property owners may install approved shrubbery and/or trees which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the 208 swale and drainage ditches as indicated in the current approved plans on file with the County Engineer's Office. The property owner or his representative shall inform each succeeding purchaser of all drainage easements on the property and of his responsibility for maintaining surface drainage paths and swales within said easements. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas, nor the responsibility for any damage, whatsoever, including, but not limited to, inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and/or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. Spokane County and its authorized agents are hereby granted the right to ingress and egress to, over, and from said easements for the purpose of inspection and emergency maintenance of 208 swales and other drainage facilities, if not properly maintained by the property owner. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect or maintain the drainage facilities, nor does the County accept any liability for any failure by the lot owner(s) to properly maintain such areas. If the property owner fails to maintain the surface path of natural or man-made drainage flow, or the drainage swale, a notice of such failure may be given to the property owner. If not corrected within the period indicated on said notice, -Spokane County has the right to correct the maintenance failure, or have it corrected, at the expense of the property owner. Any building that is constructed on a lot in this plat shall be set at such an elevation so as to provide positive drainage away from any drainage entry point to the building (including but not limited to a window well, a window unprotected by a window well, or a doorway). Said positive drainage shall consist of a minimum slope of 3% away from the building for a distance of at least 10 feet from the building. The lots shall be graded so that either a) all runoff is routed away from the building, and conveyed over the lot to a natural drainage swale or approved drainage facility, or b)drainage interception on the lot is 7 disposed of on the lot in an approved drainage facility. The approved drainage facility shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file at the County Engineer's Office. Any revisions to the approved drainage plans must be approved by the County Engineer's Office prior to construction of said revisions. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 720 NORTH ARGONNE ROAD SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99212 (509) 922-2222/FAX 926-1519 PREPARED FOR: DEAN GREER N. 9609 SEMINOLE SPOKANE, WA 99208 cc: Spokane County Planning cc: Spokane County Engineering cc: Scott Taylor Engineering TRANSAMERICA NO.: MW-185721 ' RE: SCOTTISH ADDITION SUPPLEMENTAL NUMBER 1 TO PLAT CERTIFICATE ATTENTION: This Supplemental contains changes which impact title to property set forth in the above -referenced commitment. SCHEDULE "B": X There has been no change in the title to the property covered by this order since September 28, 1994, EXCEPT the matters noted hereinabove. Dated as of April 7, 1994 at 8:00 A.M. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Maureen Wild, Title Officer sac OCT O 4 1994 SPOIU G E COUi; f Li;ultiEER VESTED IN: GREER CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Washington Corporation. EXCEPTIONS: TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 720 NORTH ARGONNE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99212 (509) 922-2222/FAX 926-1519 PREPARED FOR: DEAN GREER N. 9609 SEMINOLE SPOKANE, WA 99208 cc: Spokane County Planning cc: Spokane County Engineering cc: Scott Taylor Engineering Order No.: MW-185721M Certificate for Filing Proposed: SCOTTISH ADDITION Charge: Tax: Total: PLAT CERTIFICATE Effective Date: April 7, 1994 at 8:00 a.m. $125.00 10.00 $135.00 In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for approval, this company has examined the records of the Spokane County Auditor's and Clerk's offices, and the office of the Clerk of the United States District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount paid for this certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to wit: Tract B of SHORT PLAT NO. SP 831-93, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 9 of Short Plats, page 74; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. RECEIVED APR 1-U 1994 BPOKANE COUNTYENCINEEB 1. Taxes and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as to Parcel No. 55071.0106. Parcel numbers are provided from the latest Assessor's Maps available to the company. Said parcel numbers are not a -matter of the public record therefor, the company makes no assurance as to validity or accuracy relating thereto. 2. Liability to future assessments by Spokane County for Storm Water Drainage. page 1 of 3 Order No.: MW-185721 3. Liability to future assessments by Consolidated Irrigation District No 19. 4. Restrictions, building set -back lines, recitals, dedications and easements as disclosed by the recorded plat of Short Plat No. SP 831- 93. 5. Restrictions on other lots in said plat imposed by instrument recorded on March 3, 1905, under Recording No. 114977, which may be notice of a general plan, as follows: The purchaser shall not erect or place or permit to be erected of placed within 50 feet of a lateral ditch or a canal of said Company upon or near said premises, any stable, stable yard, poultry house or yard, water closet, privy, cess pool, manure pile or any enclosure or structure or condition productive of offal or that might, befoul the water of any canal or ditch belonging to the said Company. All fees, charges and costs herein provided for shall be a lien upon and bind said land. The Company hereby reserves, and- the purchaser does hereby grant unto the said Company, the rights of way deemed necessary by said Company for the construction and maintenance of all lateral ditches of said Company over and across said described land for the irrigation or other lands, with the rights and privileges to enter upon said lands for survey, location, construction and repair of said laterals. 6. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DISCLOSED BY: Warranty Deed recorded April 23, 1914, under Recording No. 421191 PURPOSE: Easement for flumes, and ditches for irrigation purposes and highways AREA AFFECTED: The herein described property 7. Reservations contained in deed recorded under Recording No. 608363A, as follows: The District reserves all existing rights of way and easements over and across said premises, and also the right at any time to go upon said premises, or .any part thereof, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining the canals, ditches, flumes or pipe lines, which shall by the Board of Directors of said District be deemed necessary in the operation of its irrigation system. page 2 of 3. v Order No.: MW-185721 8. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: The United States of America A perpetual right of way.and easement to construct, reconstruct, operate and maintain an irrigation turnout and appurtenances thereto S. 20 ft. of the E. 20 ft. of the W. 176 ft. of Block 3, Greenacres Irrigation District Plat "A" December 2, 1964 December 9, 1964 69490C 9. Potential liability for assessments levied by Spokane County Utility Department for the Aquifer Protection Area. To verify, call 458-2538. In order to make payment, account number is necessary. sac TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By Maureen Wild, Title Officer r page 3 of 3 0 0cc 0 z 0 -J 8 IJ tn i 8 8 FOUND REBAR 25' BUILDING SETBACK 265.00' 1 28,500 Si-. EAST PLAT "A' GREENACRES IRRIGATION DISTRICT TRACT 3 EAST 630.11' 8 0 265.00' 2 28,500 S.F. EAST 285.00' 30' II JND REDAR 0 90.00' 10' UTIL. ESMT. 3 19,000 S.F. r 6' GRAINFIELD EASEMENT EAST- EAST 95.00' 1 090.00' 95.00' r-10' UTIL. ESM T. 4 14,250 S.F. 95.00 95.00 s 5 g23,750 S.F. N 20' x 20' USA ESMT. 115.00' 0 a 6 Ln 1.188 ACS. 0 25' BUILDING SETBACK 176.00' 1 n1 125.00' 95.00 115.00' 7 ' 1.188 ACS. 10' UTIL. ESMT. 8 0 Y 1n 0 115.11' 8 1.193 ACS. 115.00' } EAST 535.88' 535.93' EAST 115.00 115.86' in 6 I E '57 '0 6 8-8 FOUND REBAR !.7 fa./ ij Rdin"' /-1. : bel-. to 6 c- 10 (" ' N p 'y�/ ' q I=�°p N f irx6E MONTGOMERY AVENUE FOUND REBAR FOUND CONC. MON.--/ m11NP PFR AR • r. • S P O K A N E "`' C O 13 DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer U.S. Bank North Spokane Branch C/O Greer Construction, Inc. N. 9609 Seminole Spokane, WA. 99208 Attn. Dean Greer RE: Scottish Add P1743 Greer Construction, Inc Dear Sir or Madam: • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director September 22, 1997 Please be advised that the Savings Assingment No. 111-2620003760 issued by your company as surety for installations of roads and associated drainage facilities for the above mentioned plat, dated October 18, 1994 in the current amount of $12,400.00 may now be released. If you have any questions, feel free to call our office Very truly yours, Bill Johns, P.E. Spokane L David A. Berto Plat Compliance Surveyor Engineer County 1026 W. Broadway .Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 • (509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER AVOID\VE'RBALORDERS PLAN PUN= MOW OFFROM Or 9 8 SPOKANE J P,7y3 PROJECT NAME: ..K'�rh/-/ AZIN: INSPECTOR: GGDwy CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS: DATE: /`30 97 ITE3ts: J 2e/frbet i c' 01' flonio$ Al `S!-,4f6 P/0 iti/vac./ f &Ft/ (M1ILA /6 /L4eg SC/z_LW,4Y5 �`h 9 G/aed OEM& �) 3eV ce ‘-/-geso .2) 2L4e6 eooeecr f=24 Sf d,R4resovoevee,e6L.s 3) do,vlotcrg eu,e6 zoce/: r- , ,e6, ,e u‘,77-/ %LAGS /Z"/(1/4,yE DOce / Opt/ EA/D5 . q) AGAct if'r GOG Lida-- 6 FE-mDti& /E24/7Ayr: E Zem/6 2Q, �) / 4 eE (k'4 VeL El S' TKRiVSi; /o,c/ Fo2 F�X/sT. J2e/ VE6U4 ✓ D4/ LO,c/1 ,ep, SEWER INFORMATION: '/ AIR?ESTED: DATE: DATE: a PASS a FAIL a PASS' a FAIL TV INSPECTION REQUEST: DATE: jNS R'3 SIGNATURE: f FAX COVER SI ET Spokane County Public Works - Engineering Division 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 Third Floor FAX No. (509) 324-3478 Phone No. (5 9) 56-3600 Date: 4 /77 FAX No. ( ) •Va - O yOd To: Company: City, State Number of pages (including cover sheet) From: Message l fs t / Li/1St/ 1,9z Li _5 • MAW PVIDICLIE MOW O FILON OW %M8 firOVALTEI PROJECT NAME: 5eam,5y 11f904/ INSPECTOR: P. FLaaJ&e CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS: /(/ou,c/rm,A/ dcssr DATE: /Z //-9% . ITEMS: /> ,(EMod6 / Pe-pi/ace- 5yP 5/b icp doe c1Ee o c _AiftA/rb ,,eV 1- GaA/G 20, 2) de/We-ere POrt/05 3) (?O,V5T/')cr 7-4PE25 PAVE 5,s/etD/c,e 6 5) f zA/5 eii , re 5/ F.PAi1 e cia,eATE OA/ D4Yak62_45 — &A/Mor 7:4r2.40 E, c F02 C'Oyyb&E" LE5/6A/ atlemg,E ALP ra e 1 A .car 7) , xyo✓E EX/4r AG2' ro AUP E6771RC - 6,e4pE aka/ an/ Pa✓ai/s ,S PIAee /02#, 4ss l)aouc/ ot/ eu/zp ewp5 /2 Ro,lo Demit/q€f Tyr SEWER INFORMATION: DATE: a PASS a FAIL TV INSPECTION REQUEST: DATE: INSPE4T5R'S SIONATURH:(,uv d aJ A1R'TFS'IEED: DATE: ❑ PASS a FAIL fANDtRELL, ••:t. e ti fr- _ 4',414-A-• •° ••• PlaarD PULNiCER WOW OPPROM WEEE1 gireMADIE OOMIEDV EINOMBIEWIS PROJECT NAME: 560/776y grew INSPECTOR: Mcwrx446,066f pc-z_edat,e5 DATE: CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS: AleavrAmi 8/26-6r ,&aec 4fig0/v6 ,e56-14v9 62126 peoR5 /x/ /06,(a /4 alsrAizz- 5' /9-.0 I Wet 7,41/57770/t/ cot Pea/E74471 Oil LOA/L tea SEWER INFORMATION: --hrzA_e____ , .• .6 :.) AIR 74ITED: DATE: DATE: u PASS u FAIL u PMS a FALL TV INkt`TION REQUEST: DATE: INSPESR'S SIGNATUIU3: grAlow-e • • •-• ...11•4•Iit-v•Ve ••• . • S P o K A N E DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer U.S. Bank North Spokane Branch C/O Greer Construction, Inc. N. 9609 Seminole Spokane, WA. 99208 Attn. Dean Greer RE: Scottish Add P1743 Greer Construction Inc. Dear Sir or Madam: Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director December 12, 1996 Please be advised that the Savings Assignment No. 111- 2620003760 issued by your company as surety for installations of roads and associated drainage facilities for the above, mentioned plat, dated October 18, 1994 in the current amount of $36,600.00 may now be reduced to $12,400.00 (twelve thousand four hundred U.S. dollars). If you have any questions, feel free to call our office Very truly yours, Bill Johns, P.E. okane County Engineer David A. Berto Plat Compliance Surveyor 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 • (509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 1st Bond Reduction PROJECT P1743 SCOTTISH ADDITION NAME D. BERTO DATE 12-Dec-96 DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST 1) Drywell - Type A @ 10% EA 0.1 1200.00 120.00 2) Drywell - Type B @ 10% EA 0.3 1600.00 480.00 3) Grate - Type 1 EA 300.00 0.00 4) Grate Type 2 EA 330.00 0.00 5) Grate - Type 4 @ 100% EA 3 300.00 900.00 6) Backfill For DW © 10% CY 15 15.50 232.50 7) Concrete Inlet EA 700.00 0.00 8) P.V.C. Pipe 10" Dia. © 10% LF 3 15.00 45.00 9) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. LF 25.50 0.00 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. LF 27.50 0.00 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. LF 31.50 0.00 12) Precast Manhole EA 1450.00 0.00 13) Solid lid @ 10% EA 0.1 300.00 30.00 14) Ditch /208 Excavation © 60% CY 49.2 10.00 492.00 15) Pond Excavation CY 10.00 0.00 16) Sod SF 0.70 0.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Filter Fabric Lining For 4 D.W. © 10% LS 55.00 2) Remove Approxc 1250 S.F. Asphalt © 10% L 400.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 2754.50 16) Monuments EA 180.00 0.00 17) Barricade ' LF 30.00 0.00 18) Street Signs EA 80.00 0.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL 0.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade @ 10% CY 39.94 10.00 399.40 20) Top Course © 20% CY 47.92 14.00 670.88 21) Base Course CY 14.00 0.00 22) Asphalt Concrete @ 100% Tons 163.8 44.00 7207.20 23) Curb Type A LF 6.60 0.00 24) Curb Type B © 20% LF 167.18 7.90 1320.72 25) Curb Type R LF 7.60 0.00 26) Sidewalk SQ YD 16.40 0.00 NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING 9598.20 INSPECTION SERVICES CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 12,352.70 USE $12,400.00 Inter -office Coo unication To From Subject OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date /0P Form 327—C.R. 19% t C. i(/t �LLLL�C�CPGI BOND ESTIMATE 'ROJECT P1743 SCOTTISH ADDITION NAME DAVE BERTO DATE 07-Oct-94 DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS DURNITY PRICE COGS .) Drywe11 - Type A EA 1 1200.00 1200.00/0 11) Drvwel 1 -- Type 8 EA 3 1600.00 4300. 00 /0 >) Grate - Type 1 EA 300.00 0.00 ▪ Grate Type E EA 330.00 0.00 • Grate - Type 4 EA 3 300.00 900.00 /COp .) Back r i I l For DW C`( 150 1 5. 50 2325. 00 /O ') Concrete Inlet EA 700.00 0.00 I) P.V.C. Pipe 10" Dia. LF 30 15.00 450,00/0 C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. LF 25.50 0.00 :0) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. LF 27.50 0.00 .1) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. LF 29.00 0.00 Precast Manhole EA 14=0.00 0. S) Solid lid EA 1 300.00 300.00/9 .4) .itch/209 Excavation CY 82 10.00 3 0.'00 AO .5) _od - SF 0.70 0.021 !ON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS .) Fitter Fabric Lining For 4 D.W. • Remove Approx 12E0 S.F. Asphalt LJ LS 30.. 00! /0 4000. 0/0 0.00 0.:'I0 0.00 0. 20 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 15245.03 6) Monuments EA 130.00 0.00 .7) Barricade LF -.� � l•.. �lll 0.00 .) Street Signs EA 30.00 0.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL 0.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK .3.) Rough Grade CY 299.4 10.00 3994.00/0 O) Top Course CY 239.6 14.00 3354.4100 11) Base Course CY 14.00 0.00 2) Asphalt Concrete Tons 163.8 44.00 7207. _0 /00 C1‘.) Curb Type A LF 6. 60 60 0.00 :4) Curb Type 8 LF 835.9 7.90 6603.61420 C) Curb Type R LF 7.60 0.00 S ) Sidewalk SD YD 16.40 0.00 ,ON -STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 0.00 0.00 ) 0. 00 GRADING -AND SURFACING 21159.21 13G)6Weau GRAND TOTAL 36,504.21 7 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TO: BILL JOHNS FROM: DAVE BERTO " DATE: October 21, 1994 SUBJECT: BOND ITEMS P1743 SCOTTISH ADD The bond for the above mention project is for the following items: 1) All the items on the approved road and drainage plans with the exception of the sod for the "208" Swales. c:\wpdoc\dave\memo\items Jl TIME DEPOSIT RECEIPT U.S. Bank of Washington, National Association NAME(S) GREER CONSTR INC ISSUE DATE 10/18/94 MATURITY DATE 10/18/95 CUSTOMER ACCOUNT NO. GREER 000245 LENIN OF TERM INTEREST RATE 4.300% TIME DEPOSIT NO. 26-20003760 K t s DATE 10/18/94 BRANCH NO. 111 PREPARED'BY V PRINCIPAL AM $ 36,600.00 OF DEPOSIT V TYPE OF TIME DEPOSIT Fixed Rate MATURITY OPTION Automatic Renewal INTEREST COMPOUND FREQUENCY Daily INTEREST PAYMENT FREQUENCY Monthly INTEREST PAYMENT METHOD Add to Principal This deposit is made under the terms of the time deposit account agreement and the Truth in Savings Disclosure for the Account Number indicated above. AD items are received for purpose of collection and all credits for items are provisional and accepted subject to the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code. 11-A-57837/94 ASSIGNMENT For security purpose& only, Greer Construction INC. hereby assigns to SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, the following: Savings Certificate Number in the £ace amount of and held in and by the Bank of Washington 111-2620003760 **36,600.00** U.S. Bank North Spokane Branch North Spokane facilities for Scottisn Aduition as specified in the typical section and roadway improvement specifications for said project, dated October 6, 1994 and on file in the Office of the Spokane County Engineer. Any interest benefits accruing under said savings certificate shall'iemain the property of Greer Construction Inc. , Said savings certificate to be released to Greer Construction Inc. or any other party Only with the prior written consent and agreement of Spokane County. Branch This assignment is made as security for the full and faithful performance by Greer Construction Inc. of certain roads, monuments and drainage PROVIDED, FURTHER, the undersigned does hereby authorize U.S. Bank North Spokane Br. to pay over to Spokane County all or a sufficient portion of the monies in the savings certificate referenced hereinabove upon written documentation being received from the Spokane County'Engineer indicating that the purposes for which the savings certificate was assigned have not been fully and faithfully performed es required and a statement of that amount of money which the County Engineer' deems necessary to complete such obligation. Upon receipt of such written documentation, Greer Inc. hereby authorizes U.S. Bank North Spokane Br. to release to Spokane County that amount of moaey requested up to the maximum amount in the savings certificate, • DATED this 18 day of October }y�,94 xx1�}9 DATED this I day of °1 • BANK OF U.S. Bank North Spokane Branch PY'b5lg Personal Banker O DEVELOPER STATE OF WASHING'TON ) :ss County of Spokane ) On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the, individual described in a who coated the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that 4 , signed the same as. and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. A.1 free GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this a C7 �rA; 7/ day of Secretiary 4S-2,c7770 /,JG, 0026p ryPu of Washin c i"a.+ for the State ton, res ding at Spokane esata7.._ BOND ESTIMATE PROJECT P1743 SCOTTISH ADDITION NAME DAVE BERTO DATE 07-Oct-94 DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Drywell - Type A 2) Drywell - Type B 3) Grate - Type 1 4) Grate Type 2 5) Grate - Type 4 6) Backfill For DW 7) Concrete Inlet 8) P.V.C. Pipe 10" Dia. 9) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. 12) Precast Manhole 13) Solid lid 14) Ditch/208 Excavation 15) Sod UNITS EA EA EA ER EA CY EA LF LF LF LF EA EA CY SF GURNITY PRICE 1 1200.00 3 1600.00 300. 00 330.00 3 300.00 150 15.50 700. 00 30 15.00 25. 50 27.50 29. 00 1450.00 1 300.00 82 10.00 0.70 COST 1200.00 4800. 00 0.00 0.00 900.00 2325.00 0. 00 450.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 300. 00 820.00 0.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Filter Fabric Lining For 4 D.W. 2) Remove Approx 1250 S.F. Asphalt 3) 4) 5) 6) LS LS 550.00 4000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16) Monuments 17) Barricade 18) Street Signs DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 15345.00 EA LF EA 180. 00 30. 00 80. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL 0.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade 20) Top Course 21) Base Course 22) Asphalt Concrete 23) Curb Type A 24) Curb Type B 25) Curb Type R 26) Sidewalk CY CY CY Tons LF LF LF SO YD 399.4 239.6 163.8 835. 9 10.00 3994.00 14.00 3354.40 14.00 0.00 44.00 7207.20 6.60 0.00 7.90 6603.61 7.60 0.00 16.40 0.00 NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 1) 2) 3) 4) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING 21159. 21 I G)6wrw GRAND TOTAL 36,504.21 STREET QUANTITIES PROJECT NO.- P1743 DESIGNER- DAVE BERTO PROJECT DESCRIPTION- SCOTTISH ADDITION DATE- 10/ 7/94 STREET # 1 NAME- MONTGOMERY AVENUE LENGTH- 535.88 FT. WIDTH- 14.00 FT. BEGINNING STATION = 1125.00 ENDING STATION = ONE SIDE ONLY PWIDTH= 14.00 EWIDTH= 0.00 OWIDTH= TERM # 1 : TAPER TAPER LENGTH = 90.00 TERM # 2 : TAPER TAPER LENGTH = 100.00 ITEM 1660.88 0.00 MEASUREMENT QUANTITY SURFACE AREA- 8832.32 S.F. ROADWAY EXCAVATION 0.83 FT. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE 0.50 FT. CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 0.00 FT. ASPHALT CONCRETE 0.17 FT. CURB TYPE B EXISTING 0.00 FT. 272.6 C.Y. 163.6 C.Y. 0.0 C.Y. 111.8 TONS PROPOSED 535.9 FT. STREET # 2 NAME- LONG ROAD LENGTH- 300.00 FT. WIDTH- 11.00 FT. BEGINNING STATION = 1180.00 ENDING STATION = 1480.00 ONE SIDE ONLY PWIDTH= 11.00 EWIDTH= 0.00 QWIDTH= 0.00 TERM # 1 : TAPER TAPER LENGTH = 100.00 TERM # 2 : TAPER TAPER LENGTH = 47.00 ITEM MEASUREMENT QUANTITY SURFACE AREA- 4108.50 S.F. ROADWAY EXCAVATION 0.83 FT. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE 0.50 FT. CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 0.00 FT. ASPHALT CONCRETE 0.17 FT. CURB TYPE B EXISTING 0.00 FT. 126.8 C.Y. 76.1 C.Y. 0.0 C.Y. 52.0 TONS PROPOSED 300.0 FT. TOTALS ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB TYPE B 399.4 C.Y. 239.6 C.Y. 0.0 C.V. 163.8 TONS 835.9 FT. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING — DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES BOND ESTIMATE FORM PROJECT Sw741/1YL /11440‘4-- DATE (%c7: c , /991- PREPARER L9 • FAc...4,Z PROJECT NO. P -'7 9-3 ITEM # DESCRIPTION QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL COST 1 TYPE "A" DRYWELL,& / $ 2 TYPE "B" DRYWELL/6a. 3 $ 3 TRIPLE DEPTH DRYWELL _ $ 4 FILTER FABRIC LINING MCA- 4 FOR TYPE A & B DRYWELLS $ 5 FILTER FABRIC LINING FOR TRIPLE DEPTH DRYWELL $ 6 BACKFILL FOR DRYWELLS,ty /S b $ 7 TYPE 1 METAL GRATE $ 8 TYPE 2 METAL GRATE '� $ 9 TYPE 4 METAL GRATE $ 10 WSDOT TYPE 2 GRATE $ 11 WSDOT TYPE 2 CONCRETE INLET BASE - UNIT "H" $ 12 SPOKANE CO. CONC. INLET 13 48" PRECAST MANHOLE $ 14 SOLID METAL LID / $ 15 DITCH/208 EXCAVATION1cy- R oZ $ 16 8" ST SEWER - / $ 17 10" ST SEWER - PvC- 3a LF $ 18 12" ST SEWER - \ $ 19 15" ST SEWER - \ $ 20 18" ST SEWER - \ $ 21 21" ST SEWER - \ $ 22 24" ST SEWER - 23 30" ST SEWER - 24 36" ST SEWER - NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS: 1 FAia vE f /& 1 S t ,esp h .L S - $ -f cv 0 2 $ 3 4 5 6 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: COMMENTS ON BOND ESTIMATE: SPOKANE COUNTY CALCULATION SHEET OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS Description: 2O9' CXc_a.vc o•._- (Q4' --tit . Project No.: /a-/743 Colc. by: ,d •F1o...7.. Date: in•e6 •95t- Title: Scn ,aX liclo/,•,,o,, Checked by: Date: Notes : Sheet / of Reference II t t .God rco�/ 4444 l _ 1 g,E Calculations FE3 Iol 3 C I I sr R LIt" I■ 900S• 1,.3a.Ca ■MM ■ l.l_3 ■■ i. o■■. ■■ �-, ■ I■ ■ M ■■ ' ■■ M■.■ ■■■■■■■ MN U (. C3-o ■■■304-■■ at7 ■ ■■.a.i7■.■■8- o ■ lit ■I■■'260 ■ l c (9■■ 8133 ■■ ■■ 1R11 _3a_._7 I ■■■�I :n■: ' ■■ ■ " n ■M. n■■■ ::■■n:.na ■ 8 ■■ ':u Bn .'::n ::C::■:n::n: ':'::: ■I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■n■ I■■■■■■■■■■■■.n■■■ ■■■.■ MEW ■■ ■la■■■■.::I■■■:I::::M::::■ :EM:n: IHHhIHHhIIHIHIHhIIuuIIIIHHhI ■I■.■■.■■■■■■■■ ■.■. ■ ■I■■■■■■■■■n■■■■ ■■■■■ ■ ::■ ■I■■ ■■■■■■.■■n■■■n■■■■■■.■■.■■■ ::_::::M:::::I::::: mom::::: :_ a:■ ■i.i::::i■ ■ n■ :: : i■I■.au■■■■■■nnuu . ii■■ ■ns ............: ■.....i:3�..n : ■■ m:pn:■::::::i::: ■■::::■11 :■ ■n ■I■■n■■■n■■. ■■■■■■■■u ■■■ ■■■■■ ■n:�I■■■■■uu■■■■■:■■■:•unu :u■i■ii n■■ I■■.■. n■■. ■■ ■■■■.I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■i■. ........:■■::n:■::nn:uu• .. mo::: !III1111_-_1111 I:::0_ 11iI ,I OEM oIE M 674 /6MQ re Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning Principals: Perry M. Taylor, P.E. Stanley R. Stirling Mark A. Aronson, P.E. David C. Larsen, P.E. August 16, 1996 Mr. Bill Hemmings, P.E. Spokane County Engineers W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 RE: Scottish Addition Drainage Analysis - Amendment #1 P/7Y3 Dear Bill, Associates: Scott M. Busch. P.E. Frank R. lde. ASLA Chief Financial Officer: Edwin G. Wagnild This amendment is submitted to your office in regard to 2 of the 3 swales designed for the road improvements on the referenced project. At the owners request we are reconfiguring the swale at the south end of Long Road, on lot 3, and the swale at the west end of Montgomery, on lot 4. Attached with this submittal is a copy of the narrative portion of the drainage analysis completed for this project, revised swale volume calculations and revised lot plans. As shown on the attached calculations the revised swales provide for the minimum volume required per the initial analysis. Please review the attached information and if you have any questions or concerns, please contact our office. Sincerely, TAYLOIj, ENGINEERING, INC. Scott M. Busch, P.E. Project Engineer Enclosure SM B/jsg/93-164B/hemming. wrd 106 W. Mission Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201-2345 • (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 Date: 8 1 3 /% 1111 ® ® ® Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning O Note to file 0 Telephone cony. O Meeting Notes 0 Field Report 0 Calcs. Chkd. f Project: 422,7T75»' 6t,6 Project #: By: /(R....c gym_. _n17117? 4r�j-vi,e' °Pak:' JeG2t ', SwAct" : :0: s a.a .. ,V0.2.;!.. fi:C:),»::Ro4p)i ::,e4 -1. 2..4b: -tt::IID.cu„+:6: =': ze L :CF..... ‘h 4.: Rimerxr. • flllio9EL5 Pavta i •# 11/ ) 6 31441r z z i3d' * (1,>7)6hrrG°0yyE. : :: R4%IS:E4::V.O'jt : .. .. ...J./A :544f ....... . =:(r7..+1'0></7 :: r, a. c_475.DZ:7;75=,SC12>5:4r>#:99rF:.. .... . .. 1�2x;5Xi,S�:,7:75..... ....... . .. ... Spokane, WA • 106 W. Mission Ave., 99201 • (509) 328-3371 • FAX 509) 328-8224 Goldendale, WA • 228 W. Columbus, Suite 104, 98620 • (509) 773-4945 • FAX (509) 773-5888 SCOTTISH ADDITIOnI LOT 4, BLOCK 1 NEW CURB x k 18' 25' BUILDING SETBACK 10' UTILITY EASEMENT 500'00'151'W W 0 10 rn 10' PVC CONNECTION LE- 494.26 (W) I.E- 493.78 (E) L w 30.00' G m 0.0167 S00'00'15"W 150.00' 150.00' PIPE 4 20' x 20' USA ESMT. BOTTOM OF SWALE EL. 497.26 SEE DETAIL 'A' EXISTING DRAINAGE \„ I EASEMENT NEW DRAINAGE EASEMENT j77'T///i/) i/ SP-831-93 A to 24'�0' 9 9./ / 5' (TYP.) GRADE DRAINAGE TO FLOW TO SWALE li Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning 1P 108 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 L 30' 1 "= 30' TYPE 'B' DRYWELL W/ TYPE 4 FRAME & COVER TOP OF COVER EL 498.82 3' CURB DROP LT. OF STA. 11+45 EL 498.07 TYPE 'B' DRYWELL W/ TYPE 4 FRAME & GRATE TOP OF GRATE EL 497.76 ASPHALT TAPER EXPIRES 01/08/97 Drawn by. JLP 8/2/9' NEW SECTION DETAIL "A" TYPICAL 208 . SWALE SECTION NOT TO SCALE TOP OF CURB AT CURB CUT. BOTTOM OF SWALE LOWERED AT CURB DROP TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE OPTIONAL BLOCK WALL (BY OTHERS) ALLOWABLE ON NORTH, NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST SIDES ONLY. • 13" MIN. TO BE GRASS SODDED (TYP.) BOTTOM OF SWALE AS SHOWN -ON PLAN jf Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 106 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 928-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 Drawn by. JLP 8/2/9- s' 1 30' SCOTTISH ADDITION LOT 3, BLOCK 1 NEW CURB ® 25' BUILDING SETBACK I .0 10' UTILITY EASEMENT 2 EAST 1 "=30' 0 0 0 AI! %/i /77777 / 3' CURB DROP RT. OF STA. 12+00 DEL 498.79 ` �500 7/77/ _7 R' / DRAINAGE EASEMENT ///// '/ /. i//./ /// /J EAST 1 6, 6' DRAINFIELD EASEMENT TYPE 'B' DRYWELL W/ TYPE 4 FRAME & GRATE TOP OF GRATE EL- 496.28 GRADE DRAINAGE TO FLOW TO SWALE A Fri" / 771 3 Ajj: Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 108 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 190.00' 0 0 0 BOTTOM OF SWALE EL 407.78 SEE DETAIL 'A' 190.00' 4 BARES 01 /08/97 8/13/96 Revised by: SMB NEW SECTION DETAIL A TYPICAL 208 SWALE SECTION TOP OF CURB AT CURB CUT. BOTTOM OF SWALE LOWERED AT CURB DROP TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE AI l't ' L TO BE GRASS SODDED (TYP.) BOTTOM OF SWALE AS SHOWN ON PLAN NOT TO SCALE r Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 108 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (609) 328-8224 Drawn bv: JLP 8/2/91 'Iy1or Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning August 5, 1994 Spokane County Engineers Division of Engineering and Roads W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260-0701 RE: Drainage Report for Scottish Addition - Revised ATTN: Mr. Bill Hemmings, P.E. Dear Mr. Hemmings: Principals: Perry Al. Taylor, P.E. Stanley R. Stirling Afark A. Aronson, P.E. David C. Larsen, P.E. Associates: Scott M. Busch, EE. Enclosed are the revised calculations and data for the drainage report for the subject project. Procedures used are as outlined in the "Guidelines for Stormwater Management" as published by the Spokane County Engineers with revisions as of 4-15-86. The format used is as follows: Project Description Soils Topographic Data Rainfall Data Proposed Runoff Control Methods of Disposal Peak Flow, Volume and Disposal Calculations a. Hydrology Computations b.' Detention/Retention Storage Capacities c. Inlet Computations Remarks Also attached are calculations to determine the curb grades along Long Road and Montgomery Avenue. Following your review, I would be happy to answer any questions you may have regarding this report. Sincerely, TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC. Scott M. Busch, P.E. Project Engineer S AJ/j sg/93-164A/He mm i ngs-080594 W. 106 Mission Ave. . Spokane, WA 99201 • (509)328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 DRAINAGE REPORT FOR SCOTTISH -ADDITION Prepared: June 6, 1994 By: Sandra Johnson Revised: August 5, 1994 Taylor Engineering, Inc. W. 106 Mission, Suite 206 Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 3258-3371 TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Description . Page 1 Methodology Page 1 Soils Page 1 Topographic Data Page 1 Demographic Data Page 1 Rainfall Data Page 1 Methods of Runoff Control Page 2 Methods of Disposal Page 2 Peak Flow, Volume and Disposal Calculations Page 2 a. Hydrology Computations Page 2 b. Detention/Retention Storage Capacities Page 3 c. Inlet Computations Page 3 Remarks Page 4 Vicinity Map Attachment "A" Soils Map Attachment "B" Basin Map Attachment "C" Vertical Curve Calculations Road Widening Calculations Road Plans DRAINAGE REPORT FOR SCOTTISH ADDITION Project Description: This project will provide for the development of approximately 6.19 acres into eight residential lots. It includes the widening of Montgomery Avenue and Long Road to an 18' half width with curb and associated drainage facilities. The project site is located northeast of the intersection of Montgomery Avenue and Long Road in the NE 1/4, Sec.7, T.25N, R.45E. W.M. Methodology: The procedures as outlined in "Guidelines for Stormwater Management" as published by Spokane County Engineers were followed. The Rational Method was used to determine maximum runoff since the basins were less than 10 acres. Soils: (See map, Attachment "B") Soils are classified as GgA - Garrison Gravelly. Loam in accordance with the "Soil Survey, Spokane County Washington, 1968". Topographic Data: (See Attachment "C") The site slopes from northeast to southwest at approximately 1%. No significant topographic features are apparent on this site. Demographic Data: The majority of the site consists of unoccupied meadow land. There is one existing residence in the southwest corner and 3 existing buildings. In the developed state, the property will have Tots ranging from 14,250 sf. to 1.2 ac. The lots will be served by the existing roads fronting each parcel. New concrete curbs will be installed along the length of the project and new asphalt road widening will accompany the curbs. Rainfall Data: Data used is in accordance with Figure 2, page 6-3 of the "Guidelines for Stormwater Management", by Spokane County Engineers. A 10 year return frequency event is used. The I-D-F chart is included with the calculations of this report. Revised Drainage Report for Scottish Addition Page 1 August 5, 1994 Methods of Runoff Control: Runoff will be conveyed to the grass percolation areas and drywells by overland flow and gutter flow along the newly widened streets. Curb cuts with aprons are used to pass the flow from the roads to the new drainage facilities. Methods of Disposal: The Bowstring Method was used to determine the size and type of drywells required to dispose of the ten-year event. A total of one Spokane County Standard Type "A" and three Type "B" drywells will be used for disposal of runoff. Peak flow, Volume and Disposal Calculation: a. Hydrology Computations: The site was divided into three basins, (A, B, & C) each with their own grassed percolation area (GPA) for runoff disposal. The following describes each basin and the drainage features associated with them. Basin A - Basin A includes the northwest comer of the site including half of Long Road from approximately STA. 11+50 to the northern plat boundary. Since Basin A utilizes two curb inlets, the basin was divided into two sub -basins and the runoff prorated based on area and total runoff for the entire basin. The residential area contributing. to the basin was analyzed with a "C" factor of 0.25 which accounts for half the abutting road. The maximum runoff generated was 0.93 cfs for the'design storm. Inlet calculations and drywell sizing are discussed in the following sections. Basing B - Basin B occupies the majority of the development running from the northeast corner to the extreme southwest corner. A portion of Montgomery Avenue (approximately 580' of the north half) and a portion of Long Road (approximately 100' of the east half) also contributes to this basin. This flow was analyzed as part overland flow and part gutter flow using a "C" factor of .20 (approx: 1.3 DU/GA) which generated a maximum runoff rate of 1.47 cfs. All runoff reaches a common low point which feeds. a GPA. Inlet calculations and drywell sizing are discussed in the following sections. Revised Drainage Report for Scottish Addition Page 2 August 5, 1994 Basin C - Basin C, the smallest of these basins, includes only the far southeast corner. A small section of Montgomery Avenue approximately 80' long, also contributes. A "C" factor of 0.15 (approx. .2 DU/GA) was used to calculate the runoff and a single GPA and drywell are sized to dispose of the 0.06 cfs generated. Inlet calculations and drywell sizing are discussed in the following sections. Detention/Retention Storage Capacities: Grassed percolation areas were calculated to hold the first 1/2" runoff over the entire impervious area for each basin. Grass percolation areas will be six inches deep with drywells installed to dispose of the runoff. The volume required and the volume provided for the 208 area for each basin is summarized on the following table. PEAK FLOW, VOLUME AND DISPOSAL SUMMARY Basin Area (Ac.) Runoff GPA Volume Req'd (c.f.) Volume Provided (c.f.) Drywells # - Type A 2.16 0.93 285 467 1 - "B" Al 0.33 A2 0.60 B 4.94 1.47 499 499 2 - "B" C 0.18 0.06 62 82 The bowstring calculations are used to determine drywell sizing. Either Spokane County Type"A" or Type "B" drywells are specified for each GPA. c. = Inlet Computations: Spokane County Standard curb inlets were sized using the Haestad Computer program, Quick Hec-12. Inlets of 3' wide were found adequate for each installation to convey runoff to the GPA's. In locations where the entire half width of the road was removed and replaced, the new cross sectional grade was used to determine inlet capacity. Revised Drainage Report for Scottish Addition Page 3 August 5, 1994 Remarks: The above described system of stormwater control will provide the quality and quantity controls as outlined in the "Spokane County Stormwater Management Guide" for Scottish Addition. Revised Drainage Report for Scottish Addition Page 4 August 5, 1994 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER • Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer October 6, 1994 Scott Busch, P.E. Taylor Engineering, Inc. W. 106 Mission Ave, Suite 206 Spokane, WA 99201 Subject: Dear Scott: Scottish Addition Spokane County No. P-1743 A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director The road and drainage plans and calculations are approved. Enclosed is a set of sepia mylars, stamped "Approved For Construction." The original plan mylar will be kept on file at the County records. In accordance with Section 2.02 A.3 of the SCRC, this approval is valid until October 6, 1996. If facilities are not constructed by then, you may request an extension for an additional two years; however, the plans may need to be revised to reflect standards current at the time of the extension request. Please be advised that if the public road and drainage facilities are constructed without surety, that the plat cannot be finalized until either: a) the public road and drainage facilities are constructed and accepted, and the roads established by the County Commissioners; or b) adequate surety for any remaining public work is posted. If you have any questions, please contact me at 456-3600. Thank you. Sincerely, Spokane County Engineers Dean Franz, P.E. Plans Review Engineer encls: 24" x 36" vellums of approved plans cc: project file 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 • (509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 /WTaylor Engineering, Inc. W. 108 Mission Avenue, Suite 206 Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 (FAX) 328-8224 To: <<Th LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE ` /¢ /¢ JOB. NO. ATTENTIO ttAN Gkictr t RE: SinWthifI4da/poni' WE ARE SENDING YOU re ATTACHED UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: r SHOP DRAWINGS n COPY OF LITTER PRINTS 4PIANS CHANGE ORDER fl ANALYSIS SPECIFICATIONS COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION / 2 teodd Ames (�n.yules) — / — z if (at/1417 'RECEIVED 0C1051994 KANE COUNTY ENGINEER TBESE ARE SUBMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: g FOR APPROVAL D APPROVED AS SUBMITTED J RESUBMIT COPIES FOR APPROVAL 1 FOR YOUR USE El APPROVED AS NOTED 0 SUBMIT COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION El AS REQUESTED CI RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS I= RETURN CORRECTED PRINTS Ej FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT 0 REIUMCS_PSGaileaL1.14ag $Tilm Pe6 APPRt A•t Q toS emu- AicR nt:nt vP !i,¢ic1c5/ COPY TO SIGNESl &/dm_zL.,4_, fl Taylor Engineering, Inc. W. 108 Miaeion Avenue. Suite 208 Spokane. Washington 99201 (509) 928-9971 (FAX) 328-8224 TO: ail, . CO . FN6t.0 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL WE ARE SENDING YOU I1 ATTACHED Q UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: Q SHOP DRAWINGS Q COPY OF LETTER it PRINTS Q PLANS Q CHANGE ORDER EJ Q ANALYSIS SPECIFICATIONS COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION / — ....-- FAvM, ,0t4r THESE ARE SUBMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: IX FOR APPROVAL Q APPROVED AS SUBMTITED Q FOR YOUR USE Q APPROVED AS NOTED FAZ AS REQUESTED Q RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS Q RESUBMIT Q SUBMIT Q RETURN COPIES FOR APPROVAL COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION CORRECTED PRINTS FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT Q FMARKS PI6# C&t4'tw 2 `�tqc/y mow iP Yes ffifi2 /+,illy enotf+6.Jy3. LE u� RECEIVED SEP 1 6 1994 COPY TO F!(6 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SIGNED 46nifi.n' "i S i Co FC A N E ':. "'1,1t' �r '_ C CD, xiN T Y n i rues OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER • Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer September 30, 1994 Scott Busch, P.E. Taylor Engineering, Inc. W. 106 Mission Ave Spokane, WA 99201 Subject: Scottish Addition Review #3 Dear Scott: A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director Spokane County No. P-1743 A review of the road and drainage plans for this project has been accomplished. Areas of concern to us are listed below. • For the '208' swale within lot 3, block 1 (Sht. 2), add a callout to the plan directing the Contractor to remove the existing gravel driveway where conflicting with the new '208' swale. • Provide a Developer's signature on each plan sheet. • Sign the Engineer's stamp on the original mylar for original mylar will be kept on file at the County. Please make the corrections and resubmit them to this office plans can be approved. If you have any questions about this 3600. Thank you. Sincerely, Spokane County Engineers Dean Franz, P.E. Plans Review Engineer cc: project file the final submittal, because the in order that the road and storm review, please contact us at 456- 1026W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 • (509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 "'Taylor Engineering, Inc. W. 108 Mission Avenue, Suite 208 Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 A,, (FAX) 328-8224 TO: LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL WE ARE SENDING YOU ;RI ATTACHED O UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: O SHOP DRAWINGS O PRINTS PLANS O COPY OF LETTER O CHANGE ORDER O iga ANALYSIS O SPECIFICATIONS COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION / — AM,. et tr (ma tap) -- ( PAIS ,Ana s (rn x �°) — 2- — _ (PAvisE4) ____ ( -- 3 col Pi*)s 40 sarT ntS (R.6vrs6s) — — enntirviztor- '-'rtSR. — t — — 3 coy— ?LAWS (rhikR- u.P) THESE ARE SUBMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: FFOR APPROVAL FOR YOUR USE O AS REQUESTED O APPROVED AS SUBMFFED El APPROVED AS NOTED O RESUBMIT O SUBMIT O RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS O RETURN COPIES FOR APPROVAL COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION CORRECTED PRINTS O FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT OI RECF�VEJr- `pest s:r 2 1 1994 nQ.c;A'r3F COUNTY ENGINEER COPY TO A746 SIGNED REVIEW COMMENTS SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING & ROADS 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260-0710 PHONE (509)456-3600 FAX (509)324-3478 REVIEW #: 2 PROJECT #: P-1743 PROJECT NAME: Scottish Addition REVIEWER: Dean Franz. P.E. DATE: 30 August 1994 These comments are to be used in conjunction with the road and drainage plan redline markups, which are attached. Address all comments by revising the plans and drainage calculations, unless otherwise noted. Previous Comments Not Adequately Addressed 1) The Engineer's stamp is to be signed and dated. Also the Developer's signature is required on each plan sheet. These signatures can be provided in the final submittal. 5) Horizontally define the location of the '208' pond bottom, by dimensioning to the nearest property corner(s). 15) '208' Pond/Driveway conflict: The conflict within lot A, between the existing driveway and the proposed pond have yet to be resolved. Please address. Provide a driveway entry for the existing drive. Reference the standard detail and specify entry width. New Comments Based Upon Newly Provided Information Road and Storm Plans 1) For the drywell at Montgomery Ave STA 11+65 (Lt), specify a solid lid. Lot Plans L1) Sign and date the engineer's stamp on each lot plan. L2) Do not show the building setback line passing through the drainage easement. To the undiscerning eye, this implies a building can be constructed within the easement. L3) Lot3: Provide dimension lines defining the location of pond bottom. REVIEW COMMENTS SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING & ROADS 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260-0710 PHONE (509)456-3600 FAX (509)324-3478 REVIEW #: 1 PROJECT #: P-1743 PROJECT NAME: Scottish Addition REVIEWER: Dean Franz. P.L g1/4- DATE: 28 July 1994 These comments are to be used in conjunction with the road and drainage plan redline markups, which are attached. Address all comments by revising the plans and drainage calculations, unless otherwise noted. Road and Storm Plans Montgomery Ave Plan/Profile Sheet 1 1) The Engineer's stamp is to be signed and dated. Also the Developer's signature is required on each plan sheet. These signatures can be provided in the final submittal. 2) Construction Notes: a: Revise note #4 to require a "licensed surveyor" certify grade stakes. b: Add a note to read "Wrap the drywell and gravel envelope with a filter fabric (AMOCO 4545 or approved equivalent) in accordance with Standard Plan B-1." c: Add a note to read "Contractor shall relocate any utilities, where conflicting, prior to construction of road and drainage facilities." 3) Provide separate lot plans for those lots which will have drainage easements. The specific lot plan requirements are attached. 4) Show the existing stop sign in the plans, located at the street intersection. Since the sign is located where new pavement will be added, add a note requiring the Contractor to relocate. 5) Horizontally define the location of the '208' pond by dimensioning to a property corner. 6) Show the existing barb -wire fence in the plans. It is located along the north side of Montgomery Ave. Add a note requiring the Contractor to remove the fence where it conflicts with new road construction. 7) A drywell can be located no further than 8 ft. from the curb, or REVIEW COMMENTS 28 July 1994 REVIEW # 1 PROJECT # P-1743 PROJECT NAME Scottish Addition Page 2 of 3 a 15'. wide gravel maintenance drive needs to be provided to the drywell. Provide access or relocate the drywell. Multiple drywells are to be located no closer than 30 ft. apart, so as to not inhibit the flow capacity of each drywell by proximity. The drywells shown are approximately 15 ft. apart. Revise. 9) There are 3 or 4 existing mailboxes located approximately 3' from the edge of existing asphalt along the north side of Montgomery Ave. Show the mailboxes in the plans and provide a note requiring the Contractor to relocate these mailboxes. 10) Pavement Taper: a: Taper length shown for Montgomery Ave is 50 ft. The minimum incoming taper length is 100 ft. Revise taper length. b: List the station where the taper is to begin. c: Provide a 4" white strip along the edge of the taper, running the full length of the taper. 11) For the end of the curb, provide a 12" long nose down. 12) The drywell at Montgomery Ave STA 16+60 has a grate elevation which is not set at 0.50' above the top of the '208' pond. Revise grate elevation. 13) In the curb profile, list the station and elevation of each curb drop, normally listed at its centerline. 14) List the pavement elevation at PVI STA 15+75. It is best to be clear which elevation applies to the PVI and which elevation applies to the pavement. Long Road Plan/Profile Sheet 2 15) Existing Driveway at approximate STA 11+85: a: Show the limits of the driveway in the plans, in the vicinity of the curb and '208' pond. b: Provide curb cuts for the driveway. Define by stationing in the profile. Provide and reference a driveway entry detail. c: There is a conflict between the existing driveway and the proposed '208' pond. Address conflict. REVIEW COMMENTS 28 July 1994 REVIEW # 1 PROJECT # P-1743 PROJECT NAME Scottish Addition 16) List the station where Page 3 of 3 the asphalt 17) At the curb end, provide a Drainage Calculations & Basin Map D1) D2) taper will terminate. 12" long nose down. Show the Time of Concentration routes (Tc) in the basin map, and correlate with the Tc's used in the calculations. For basin B, the Tc lengths shown in the computations seem than what can be achieved as compared to the basin size. check. D3) The minimum '208' volume size, requirements, is listed as 443 c. checking the pavement area shown in requirements should be 500 c.f. (i longer Please based upon impervious area f. in the calculations. Upon the basin map, the '208' volume .e. 11,800 s.f./24). Revise. D4) According to the calculations, and what is shown in the plans, the '208' volume provided for basin B is 488 c.f. However the calculations list a minimum required volume of 663 c.f. Address discrepancy. PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM C O 13 N T Y WALLIS D. HUBBARD, DIRECTOR RECEIVED MAY 1 0 1994 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER TO: Division of Engineering and Roads Division of Utilities Division of Buildings Spokane County Health District Fire Protection District No. 1 Central Valley School District Consolidated Irrigation District FROM: Steve Davenport, Planner I SQ DATE: May 9, 1994 SUBJECT: Review of Final Plat PE-1743-93 SCOTTISH ADDITION Enclosed find copies of the above referenced final plat. Please review and forward any comments by May 24, 1994. If you have any questions you may contact Steve Davenport at 456-2205. Thank you. sam Enclosure c: Dean Greer, 9609 North Seminole, Spokane, WA 99208 WEST 1026 BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0240 • (509) 456-2205 04/28/94 18:49 $5093288224 TAYLOR ENGINEER 44. COUNTY ENGINEERS e001 MEMO VIA FACSIMILE TAYLOR ENGINEERING INC. WEST 106 MISSION AVENUE, SUITE 206 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 TO: Spokane County Engineers FAX: (509) 324-3478 Pat Harper PHONE: (509) 458-3600 FROM: Scott Busch FAX: (509) 328-8224 PHONE: (509) 328-3371 RE: Scottish Add. DATE: April 28, 1994 NO. OF PAGES: 1 TIME: (including cover) This fax is in regard to the road widths for the referenced plat. The road sections required for both Long and Montgomery are Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Local Access standard, per the plat conditions (improvements to be completed on the plat side of the existing roads). As per our telephone conversation, the total width for this type of road section is 33' of asphalt with Type "B" curb(36' to face of curb). It is also our understanding, pending revisions to the Road Standards, that this is the accepted width for this road section on future projects. Please review this and if the information is not per your understanding ,give us a call. Thanks. FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO P1743 SCOTTISH ADD PLAT.ROUNDRY 5-6-94 D.R. AUTO INVERSE ***** START 1000.00140 300.00000 1 INV N 0 00 15.0 E 300.0000 1300.00140 300.02182 2 INV N 90 00 00.0 E 630.1100 1300.00140 930.13182 3 INV S 0 05 41.0 E 450.0000 850.00201 930.87576 4 INV N 90 00 00.0 W 535.8800 850.00201 394.99576 5 INV N. 0 00 15.0 E 150.0000 1000.00201 395.00667 6 INV N 90 00 00.0 W 95.0000 1000.00201 300.00667 -40'01` C410>- LAT & DEP-0.00061 -0.00667 7 HCLOSE S 84 44 36.5 W 0.0067 1000.00140 300.00000 PREC = 1 TO 322567 Area = 269472.86 sq ft 6.18625 ac 1 'IW TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC. Civil t.106m erog LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL West 106 MissionnAveAve Spokane, WA 99201 Voice Phone (509) 328-3371 Fax: (509) 328-8224 To: Paul Lenneman, E.LT. Date: September 27, 1996 Spokane County Engineers Office Fax: (509) 324-3478 Phone: (509) 456-3600 From: Scott M. Busch, P.E. Re: Scottish Addition Attached with this Letter of Transmittal are mylar and vellum copies of the revised road plans for the referenced project. A bond copy with the revisions highlighted is also included. The revisions consisted of changing the layout of the swale on Long Road and the westerly swale on Montgomery Avenue. These revisions were per the previously submitted addendum and lot plans. The other revision that was completed was in regard to the call -out for the surface of the swale. The option of seeding the swale was added so the revised lot plan Detail "A" is also included. Please replace the existing Detail "A" for all three lot plans with the attached detail. We would appreciate your contacting our office when the vellum copy is signed off and we will pick it up. If you have any questions or comments regarding the attached information, please contact our office. Thanks cc: File SEP 2 7 1996 SPOtWi'IE COUIJN ENGINEER VARIANCE BLDG # OTHER # pI7y3 S T R APPLICANTS NAMF MAILING ADDRESS PARCEL # PHONE - HOMF ROAD NAME f ttifio Pep' Ave PHONE - WORK The following documents are needed before the Spokane County Engineer's Department cau begin processing your variance or building application as approved. (509) 456-3600 AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES have been collected. ,---------RECORDED COPY OF DEED, DEED OF TRUST, contract or conveying instrument. These may be obtained from the County Auditor, 2nd floor of the Courthouse. • LEGAL DESCRIPTION of access easement. A LISTING OF NAMES of individuals who will be. signing the documents. These individual names - should appear as the person(s) legally sign their flame. vc),,JOLY TN LJe2-e3a✓ A CURRENT ASSESSOR'S MAP which depicts the location of your property. /OWNERSHIP MICRO -RUN. These may be obtained from the County Assessors, 1st floor, of the Courthouse, Jefferson entrance, 2nd door on the left. The necessary documents will be prepared by the Engineer"s Department, Right -of -Way Section, upon provision of the information noted above. You will be notified when the documents are ready for signature. The documents may be sent to you, however, IT SHOULD BE NOTED -THAT ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED. The Engineer's Department does have notaries available if you choose to sign the documents at our office. Please call when ready Please mail when ready Notice to Public #. n Right -of -Way 7 — COMMENTS P� 1. c (/✓/ ! ✓c(i Ct S -}ti ✓ 1 L 0T y _5c o tr,'s / 015-;c)A-2 Right -of -Way Agent la(_� Forward to you from k\r\ viotkc.t92 T' 08/23/96 11:21 $5093288224 r-23 -1996 00:00AM FROM Greer ' Lew, Mr,h,r. 00e009200s Ell BarakeefrAiyseTiea- ritANK OF AMER ICA Co n st - TAYLOR ENGINEER .. COUNTY ENGINEERS a003/004 TO 3200224 P.03 0ifico asidrolCfNtithL;2E0 5llIPPINO UN! if'BB0GO1080')GTi Car .I1 e0200 GATEWAY Slade AT IN SIIIPPIHO 0(PARIMENT ZIP CYPRESS, CA 0003U-0013 J Rl MI id milli TRANSMIT/ON TITLE tlt.1 l all 1.11101 1vu�lU1 $I'n! tl u►ilui, br.AIr 8ll 7 ?AGE :i v.) .iSe . nJ, OA. rw Inn t Dal DEED OF TRUST THIS DITTO OP'rKUST ("Security Inalrument•) is midi on APR it 01 19 00 The grantor is VICTOR IYANovl &N0 21 TA IVANOVA, w11O ARE WRRIEO 10 EACH OTHER 11.z Li - CHAR TERED BANK , which is urgsnixed and existing under iho ties Of THE STATE OF DREGON and whnsc .JJr® is21000 N.W. EVERGREEN PARKWAY HILLSBORO, OR O712a - Mender). Borrower on (.ender the principal sum of N I NE 1 Y SEVEN THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED FIFTY F 1 VE *NO 00r 100 Dollars (US. S 07, 156.00 )_ 'nth debt is sviJenced by &,rmwcr's nuts dated the Ismc date u this Security Instrument ('Note"), which provides in( monthly payments, with the full dcht, is not paid earlier, ells and payable on MAT 01, 2020 This Stcurity Inslntmcnt aloes 10 Lender (;) the repayment of the debt evidenced by the Nute, with interest, and all renewals, extensions and motif( keening nfthe Nowt (b)the ymentof all other gumswith interest, advanced under perraph7toprotectthefectlrily of Ibis Saurlty Instrumenq and (c) .og rwrfnrma nee nr Itortnwer i covenant. Ind agreements under this Gal wiry Instrumau and the Note. Por this purpose, Borrower irrevocably grants and convert to'Ftwta. in that, with pnwcr of sale, the following described proyeatylaalW.in SRO("*NE (;uunly, Washington: LOT 4 Or 6COTT,cui a001TION AS PER FLAT TNE(EDP NECOROED IN VOLUME 22 OF PLAlD, PACE BA; ('Rertnwor'), The touts. istfANSNA TION T 1 TLE ("Tr's,ce'),Tbo beneficiary is BANK OF AMERICA OREGON, A 51ATE CI TTATE tel WC COUNTY 00 SPOCANE, Star( OF WASHINCTON. ASSESSORS PARCEL NuaeR, 60011.040e which has the •JJrase.of 11017 E MONTGOMERY OWE Washington 01101R (ZIp (Snlal TOORr1 bile WITI1 all the improvements nue or hcreaftercrecte4 nn the property, and all easements, ■ppurIcnana5, Ind Tilton= now or hereafter a part of the p'nlsrly. All replacements and additions atoll also be covered by this Security Instrument. Alt of the foregoing !frittered W in this Stcurity Instrument as the' Prayer' y.• AORROWCit COVENANTS that f nuovdsr le lawfully ceir.41 n( the Crete hereby conveyed and Tuts the right to grant and convey the Property end that the Pmperty ituncncumtend, except for eneumbnnce of record. Borrower warrants and will 'Wand CenarP ly the title to the Property a pl rot sll Claims sod Jam anJa, sublet TO soy encumbrance of record. TIIIS SECURITY INSrRVhlrtNT combines uniform covenants Inc muionl use and non'uniforrn covenants with IIm itd verittione by jurisdicilon Iu mnstitutee unitnrm security iilarument covering cal prortny. WAB14iNCTO14-511ar rears• finnla Maa/Prttdl. tan UNIFORM IN1TAUMENf Farm 1011 9112 ebw.w. raga. rap 1 et 1 Allawn It , CREENACRES City (5trorl f rmisrtyAddrm'): Z • • : 0 0 0 0 ; . LJ • PO N.00M0'15" E. 30 , ; . . ID REBAR • 0 0 0 oo V:•4' 0 0 0 0 0 Tt• 2426 25' BUILDING SETBACK 2420 -5 5, t 14. s EAST , 285.00' A " r T. • ' • . = • T. • • ,•• 2. : 28,500 S.F. 190.00' 5 ' 1-55 • 5.4*.- • I • , I • EAST 285.00' • r•-1--- 10' UTIL ESMT. 2414 3 8 DRAINAGE 19,000 S.F. EASEMENT ci0 33' EAST 95.00' • o • 125.00' IN --FOUND REBAR . `. l'5.• :,'• ': t.r. '. '' • . ' 4- ......•••.4 '. 5-5-' ,..5.„....., . .. .5 , - - _ 5........ „., • ......, ..5,............... ... .„...... .„....5,. ... .5..5555'5' ' ............555„......................5.55........,..............,..........5.....55.,w-5.....555 "5 • • '4 ... , 5 . • 5.' .- • .5,. -4 .i. . :.• 4.. .% '15' • ' . . . /. . . . 4 : f:, ,4,z. . J .- . . . ,' 5 : si.'01. i.O. • I • k 1. . .! . • . .• 1 . . • 1 . l•P's , • • KNOW , ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT GREER CONSTRUCTION, INC., A WICSMINGTONih;.4 1•5 CORPORATION, HAS CAUSED TO BE PLATTED INTO LOTS; BLOCKS; 'AND STREETS ,THEI LAND SHOWN HEREON TO BE KNOW AS SCOTTISH ADD1TION,1BEING A PARCEL OrLANDIX 'IN, THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 7; 1,25N:42.45E.0 WiMi- IN SPOISANE44 i'l'eC9UNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ; • ; ;•ti.t•••.'•?!••1„:' -• T - • t.„; , TRACT B OF SHORT PLAT NO. SP 831-93 /,‘„S'Optil PLAT' THEREOF RECORDED' iN? VOLUME 9 OF SHORT PLATS, PAGE 74; .14 SITUATE IN THE COUNTY oe SPOKANE, STATE itiMkiNotow..:4 'AA/ 1 . • • • CONDMONS: •;.„ - • SIDE' YARD AND REAR YARD SETBACKS SHALL -BE' uETERMINED AT THE TIME -'5.5e,,5 . BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUESTED UNLESS4THESt!SETB. A, 0:KS ECIFIrCAL.Lr riRartrn ON THIS FINAL. PLAT. THE SETBbGIKS;INPIGATE0,10,NpliSifo.thiatii5.52,g,%thithryck, • • - • fAintikAFTEITD I 190.00' , 5 : 95.00' ;10 , di L. . ,,, 4 ,' :„.. -• „„ : l ••• Ini... ;,„y , „•-c- 1 4.260 S:F.: •:: 41. 5 , , ,,.... I.._ i 4. obo DR-,'.A'--ff:I? N,'A;l'i,•G•,iE'i ,;,•5; 1s4ILASEMENTp0 t . ..cii ..:5.4 ,."- • ,0s2uit,it0;st4:'3E:•.,-.ktsi4. „:1mo51 t.5:25.;.t4p....tw33',) •r. ± '.:1 '14 .t.t 5 95o0. • : 1:59:15ftoCo':;:ri 55t0,'.::„ t, • 176.00r :I:, . ; i• II'';.i;•! 77 • • , T'lli,7,,4-t„,-,,f,, ' • ••::- " b , f ; 10 . ':' ', Cq1 • .;5.r.f,1‘; 5' . • ' , eA ',. , ., Oa. „ Pi5.45V."5.551t.45 ' 4:7, e P.P.-et.fraAst 0%)5 trr nry i4\ it ft A t • .5 ;..4 5`. +1;t455-It‘ 7•,,p4 „.„,,,f v„."51 ••• Oic siA3b1 08/23/96 11:20 T25093288224 TAYLOR ENGINEER COUNTY ENGINEERS C{1j001/004 Ir TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC. Civil Design and Lard Fleming West 106 Mission Ave Spokane, WA 99201 Voice Phone (509) 328-3371 Fax: (509) 328-8224 FAX TRANSMITTAL To: Paul Lenneman, E.I.T. Date: August 23, 1996 Spokane County Engineers Office Fax: (509) 324-3478 Phone: (509) 456-3600 From: Scott M. Busch Re: Scottish Addition Message consists of 4 page(s) including cover sheet Following this fax is a copy of the legal description for the revised drainage easement. Also attached is a copy of deed information that we received from our client. If you have any comments or questions regarding this information, please contact our office. Thanks cc: Greer Construction -- Dean Greer 08/23/96 11:21 $5093288224 TAYLOR ENGINEER -4+-. COUNTY ENGINEERS J002/004 Revised Swale Legal That portion of Lot 4, Block 1 of Scottish Addition as per Plat recorded in Volume 22 of Plats, page 84, Spokane County Auditor's office, Spokane County, described as follows: The West 50.00 feet of the South 24.00 feet of said Lot 4. 08/23/96 11:22 V5093288224 TAYLOR ENGINEER +-r- COUNTY ENGINEERS I1004/004 23-1996 00t00RM FROM Greer Connt .r.. ....v...,w„.w m,J I 1•1lu1 elan cc bola 4 Cad men, P.O. I. 11104 Mots 1 . ar. reel TO 3200224 P.02 f It1t1('u �7JA'�I0�f. TITLE AL LW ST.ir APR 6 4 iorK196 STATUTORY WAUIRANTY DEED un,l,1l.11r, 110NAIIUE .UtiITOR S PUg/llt CCU/111'11SH. unroll — TILE ORANTOlt9, CItY.ETt'LONSTIlUCP1ON, INC, a WeaUngtoo.cwporatioR. vol. ((� /r4cf ,) U IN CONSIDERATION orlon Douera.and.otlter valuable. conaideralien:. ,,! In land paid, convey .nd ..armor to VICrOR IVANOV AND 22TA 1VANOVA husbandand.wife; the following de.cribedseal.esater situated In the Courtly of Spokane,.5tate.of Wellington: 104 4 of SCOTTI3H ADDMON, 41 per put thereof recorded -in Voltune 22 of Plata, Page &1. Situate In the County or 3pokane,.9ate.ur Washington.. 6DTurcriv: I. Uahillty (or new improvements. which are nut presently saeaaed. but may appear. on future tat rolls 2. 1l41.1lity for future neocesua,t.J.y Cutapoliclatad.lrrlgttoh.DUtrlct. No. 10. 3. Liability for frame charges by Spokane -County tor Storm Water *orrice. 4. Roatrlettwa.un other tote In sNG.ptat.latpoeca.by 4utrument tecor4N on Marsh 3, 1009, under. Recording No.114077, which may ]q notice of a generd.pkn. 1. Easement and the terms and eondhlunadhercvf, fu the purpose.otEaaemetn fur flurnes,aAd4itches. for irrigation purposaa.4nd highways. affecting the herein destibed.properiy, ttilelosed.by Warranty DOS, Recordod April 29, 1914, coder Reconling No. 421191. 0. Heaervadone contained In deed recorded under Recording No, 308303A. T. All cavcnrni/, tonditiwy rorlrialgn 'or teaenatlons; WI casementaar otter eervitudn, rights err Moafta Width may IN shown an the plot afccting.lend.ousuo.tho bouncing. described above, V any, dlaclosc,.Lly the recorded Jecumente cf the ehon plat of short phd.no. SP•e31.07, In Volume 0 of short Plats, page 74. 8 AU covenants, .eon,Ltiona,restriellordac rc+ervat on.;edleuermuear other servitudes dill ts or benefits which nay In .lawn ten the plat aITectbtg.land. outa)de4rle towl1ury dcocribed.0enre, if any daadu.ed.by the recorded documents of the plat of Scottish Additionrct Volume 22.of New page SI. 0. Tillo roue and the term.' and.condlllons.thcreed given by 3pokana County. PWtrtlpg Depantaent,.Duted. November 21, 1991, Recorded.}lovemttcr21, 1904, under Romrding.No, 0411210308. 1A. La.entwu4 ar1J the terma and corny loo.thoroorgrant Mty Tito United StatesstAnicrica. Jated.Deeamber. I, 1084, under l% cur.lirtg No. 1111I000, recorded Devember.9. 1984. Dated: April 1, 194 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) as. County of Spokane 9600004418 Tat Peld pre false 2i.i Sate ,51 unllyy(J a On this day personally appeared borate me DEAN CREEK_ tome known to be the President of CIUZIC_ coN5TRU0171'SR, the corporation who erecvtal the within and foregoing. instrument,. and. eeknowlcilgad the 1nW. 1n,trumenl 10 be the free and voluntary set and deed of add.orporatlon.$or the uses and.purpooealhurcin mentioned -and. on *alb etated.taU,e wu authorized to alecuta.tha Wd.Lutnuncnt;. OIVEN under t11y Rana and.oflletal scsi. ttla-� defy of April, 1998 arAttitteA 0u: s Ire• t.r .ti °r'e �1 ;riK4v.'.re z.. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER • Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer August 30, 1994 Scott M. Busch, P.E. Taylor Engineering, Inc. W. 106 Mission Ave Spokane, WA 99201 Subject: Scottish Addition Review #2 Spokane County No. P-1743 Dear Scott: A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director A review of the road and drainage plans for this project has been accomplished. Areas of concern to us are indicated in red on the attached prints and discussed in the attached Review Comments. Please make the corrections and resubmit them to this office in order that the review process may proceed. Please provide 2 copies of plans and calculations for the project with each submittal. If you have any questions about this review, please contact us at 456-3600. Thank you. Sincerely, Spokane County Engineers Dean Franz, P.E. Plans Review Engineer encls: Plans (1 set) Comments (1 page) Lot Plans cc: project file W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509) 456-3600 FAX (509) 456-4715 TDD: (509) 324-3166 r /. SCOTTISH ADDITION LOT 8, BLOCK 1 EAST 7 BOTTOM OF SWALE EL 498.70 SEE DETAIL 25' BUILDING SETBACK 10' U11L. ESMNT. 115.11' DRAINAGE EASEMENT 8 NEW CURB 115.88T I Y EAST C MONTGOMERY AVE 5.90' 3' CURB DROP LT. OF STA 16+50 EL. 499.48 iI Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 106 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (609) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 1 01 0 0 0 5' TIP. 500 0 0 0 01 r 1 agcsc PLAT „A" GREEARE- 1RR«A'ION L { .I TRACT TYPE 'A' DRYWELL W/ TYPE 4 FRAME & GRATE TOP OF GRATE a.. 499.20 /Di • • ■ • ■ 0 Orp\ 792E F�f` 'ICI STE •as/ONAL ♦♦••■• fit. 5►9&— agisiusitt • ■ cr1 '4.• EXPIRES 01 /08/95 Drawn by. JLP 8/2A cn w 5 SCOTTISH ADDITION LOT 4, BLOCK 1 NEW CURB S00'00'151'W 10' PVC CONNECTION I.E= 494.28 (W) LE— 493.76 (E) L 30.00' G = 0.0167 DRAINAGE EASEMEN T BOTTOM OF SWALE a. 497.28 SEE DETAIL 'A' 150.00' 25' BUILDING SETBACK 10' UTILITY EASEMENT 38' j'j Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 106 Mission Ave. Spokane; Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 18' k 1 "= 30' G MONTGOMERY AVE. TYPE '0 DRYWEL W/ TYPE 4 FRAME & COVER. TOP OF COVER EL 498.82 TYPE iB" DRYWELL W/ TYPE 4 FRAME & GRATE TOP OF GRATE EL 497.78 3' CURB DROP LT. OF STA. 11+25 EL 497.99 EXPIRES 01 08/95 Ilrnuin I..r II D sz /', /n • 18' 3 (TYP.) SCOTTISH ADDITION LOT 3, BLOCK 1 NEW CURB 25' BUILDING SETBACK 10' UTILITY EASEMENT ? L 26' EAST 6' DRAINFIELD EASEMENT TYPE 'B' DRYWELL W/ TYPE 4 FRAME do GRATE TOP OF GRATE EL. 498.28 1 r CURB DROP RT. OF STA. 11+51.67 EL. 498.51 2 0'r Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 108 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 EAST 1 "= 30' on Nee ••6 BUS•• 4iGs� 6 WASi NOti •• • • • • 27923 c't •���M Sa• EXPIRES 0 /08/95 Drawn by. JLP M..S L.00.00S 8/2/C ft `, REVIEW COMMENTS SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING & ROADS 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260-0710 PHONE (509)456-3600 FAX (509)324-3478 REVIEW #: 1 PROJECT #: P-1743 PROJECT NAME: Scottish Addition REVIEWER: Dean Franz. P. DATE: 28 July 1994 These comments are to be used in conjunction with the road and drainage plan redline markups, which are attached. Address all comments by revising the plans and drainage calculations, unless otherwise noted. Road and Storm Plans Montgomery Ave Plan/Profile Sheet 1 The Engineer's stamp is to be signed and dated. Also the Developer's signature is required on each plan sheet. These signatures can be provided in the final submittal. OX. - 2) , Construction Notes: pd Revise note #4 to require a "licensed surveyor" certify grade . / stakes.. , sw.566 ✓it,{o c b: Add a note to read "Wrap the drywell and gravel envelope with a filter fabric (AMOCO 4545 or approved equivalent) in accordance with Standard Plan B-1. " /94,;Aite nJo7.� Vc: Add a note to read "Contractor shall relocate any utilities, where conflicting, prior to construction of road and drainage facilities." epee:: ,t?o7 G v3) Provide separate lot plans for those lots which will have drainage easemerlts. The specific lot plan requirements are attached. her NGRiU 445. ;rc'�=ct.Q6D V4) Show the existing stop sign in the plans, located at the street intersection. Since the sign is located where new pavement will be added, add a note requiring the Contractor to relocate. Added it P0-41/0 Horizontally define the location of the '208' pond by dimensioning to a property corner. 446 4lrn.ENS:c,O3 Show the'existing barb -wire fence in the plans. It is located along the north side of Montgomery Ave. Add a note requiring the Contractor to remove the fence where it conflicts with new road construction. ,,44464, n)c7 7) A drywell can be' -located no further than 8 ft. from the curb, or 1�) 4 REVIEW COMMENTS 28 July 1994 REVIEW # 1 PROJECT # P-1743 PROJECT NAME Scottish Addition Page 2 of 3 a 15' wide gravel maintenance drive needs to be provided to the drywell. Provide access or relocate the drywell. SEE✓/5Ell e.o4472cn) of 4ieWeL[. 8) Multiple drywells are to be located no closer than 30 ft. apart, so as to not inhibit the flow capacity of each drywell by proximity. The drywells shown are approximately 15 ft. apart. �� Revise. ✓/3aj L c,P7on) oc !)jekid�LL �9) There are 3 or 4 existing mailboxes located approximately 3' from the edge of existing asphalt along the north side of Montgomery Ave. Show the mailboxes in the plans and provide a note requiring the Contractor to relocate these mailboxes. hiA4A0Z GAGC o uy" 10) Pavement Taper: -tea: Taper length shown for Montgomery Ave is 50 ft. The minimum incoming taper length is 100 ft. Revise taper length. V/b: List the station where the taper is to begin. ,M066a4) 7C 'mod (-Ilan 'Von;c: Provide a 4" white strip along the edge of the taper, running the full length of the taper. ACI4&4 Noy 7 4 For the end of the curb, provide a 12" long nose down. ,44.1dadS is Gwi% 4 The drywell at Montgomery Ave STA 16+60 has a grate elevation which is not set at 0.50' above the top of the '208' pond. Revise grate elevation. ,2...5, j cgwegr5 E�1 In the curb profile, list the station and elevation of each curb drop, normally listed at its centerline. 441LO c/itteu.T3 rT Ae„ /te List the pavement elevation at PVI STA 15+75. It is best to be clear which elevation applies to the PVI and which elevation applies to the pavement. A1446 n- Po,nlr Cogezotar Long Road Plan/Profile Sheet 2 15) Existing Driveway at approximate STA 11+85: 14Show the limits of the driveway in the plans, in the vicinity of the curb and '208' pond. »a0a LOc47/on) of �xlst &jvE wp Provide curb cuts for the driveway. Define by stationing in the profile. Provide and reference a driveway entry detail. There is a conflict between the existing driveway and the proposed '208' pond. Address conflict. w6 RE6 chkescerty CooRtdrw477p) toc.er'onj c.:177-1 Our&M- REVIEW COMMENTS 28 July 1994 REVIEW # 1 PROJECT # P-1743 PROJECT NAME Scottish Addition Page 3 of 3 et 6) List tR4466he� station where the asphalt taper will terminate. 1 VT 7) At the curb end, provide a 12" long nose down. ilhb/a20� Pid%. Drainage Calculations Basin Map le.41) Show the Time of Concentration routes (Tc) in the basin map, and correlate with the Tc's used in the calculations. /1450447J06 T Ff10745 / o N A7Ti7 a% B -sati m.4P ✓D2) For basin B, the Tc lengths shown in the computations seem longer than what can be achieved as compared to the basin size. Please check. Z F,9rr2/ /s esdoec on) /477MA9 zi A'ttfruir 6 !.)4/l), 1/4) The minimum '208' volume size, based upon impervious area :ite, requirements, is listed as 443 c.f. in the calculations. Upon checking the pavement area shown in the basin map, the '208' volume requirements should be 500 c.f. (i e. 11,800 s.f./24).Revise. t'Jiscd CALLS - 4DdErS zee S1 zi n!G a4LS/fe.077 D4) According to the calculations, and what is shown in the .plans, the '208' volume provided for basin B is 488 c.f. However the calculations list a minimum required volume of 663 c.f. Address discrepancy. v`�SEI� cik s AzAU.d Sw'IQGc' . Atb664 we 3Jz'n & c AL. Me REVIEW COMMENTS SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING & ROADS 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260-0710 PHONE (509)456-3600 FAX (509)324-3478 REVIEW 1: 1 PROJECT #: P-1743 • PROJECT NAME: Scottish Addition REVIEWER: Dean Franz. P.FA-Agft- DATE: 28 July 1994 These comments are to be used in conjunction with the road and drainage plan redline markups, which are attached. Address all comments by revising the plans and drainage calculations, unless otherwise noted. Road and Storm Plans Montgomery Ave Plan/Profile Sheet 1 - 1), The Engineer's stamp is to be signed and dated. Also the Developer's signature is required on each plan sheet. These signatures can be provided in the final submittal. oX, - 2) Construction Notes: a: Revise note #4 to require a "licensed surveyor" certify grade stakes.: REVue /yo7E - b: Add a note to read "Wrap the drywell and gravel envelope with a filter fabric (AMOCO 4545 or approved equivalent) in accordance with Standard Plan B-1." 14666 FJo72E5 c: Add a note to read "Contractor shall relocate any utilities, where conflicting, prior to construction of road and drainage facilities." 17404 ,tJoy (o 3) Provide separate lot plans for those lots which will have drainage easements. The specific lot plan requirements are attached. her 0.) ,926 hoo_R ec -4) Show the existing stop sign in the plans, located at the street intersection. Since the sign is located where new pavement will be added, add a note requiring the Contractor to relocate. 4,445e4 re, AAA) -5) Horizontally define the location of the '208' pond by dimensioning to a property corner. A4AE6 Afm6N5(mOS -6) Show the existing barb -wire fence in the plans. It is located along the north side of Montgomery Ave. Add a note requiring the Contractor to remove the fence where it conflicts with new road construction. , koisis n)o7 A drywell can be located no further than 8 ft. from the curb, or REVIEW COMMENTS 28 July 1994 REVIEW # 1 PROJECT # P-1743 PROJECT NAME Scottish Addition Page 2 of 3 a 15' wide gravel maintenance drive needs to be provided to the drywell. Provide access or relocate the drywell. AEV/stA co4477010 of A€Vsdett 8) Multiple drywells are to be located no closer than 30 ft. apart, so as to not inhibit the flow capacity of each drywell by proximity. The drywells shown are approximately 15 ft. apart. Revise. gay/sad GocA7ion) of 6,eycoga. 9) There are 3 or 4 existing mailboxes located approximately 3' from the edge of existing asphalt along the north side of Montgomery Ave. Show the mailboxes in the plans and provide a note requiring the Contractor to relocate these mailboxes. 644,5A amour 10) Pavement Taper: - a: Taper length shown for Montgomery Ave is 50 ft. The minimum incoming taper length is 100 ft. Revise taper length. kia/ISitO 7AVAe " b: List the station where the taper is to begin. /jLApLcp 70 66,06 4410 'c: Provide a 4" white strip along the edge of the taper, running the full length of the taper. ,'4,g4 /vom 7 11) For the end of the curb, provide a 12" long nose down. AQdE.b 7a E eat fuorS - 12) The drywell at Montgomery Ave STA 16+60 has a grate elevation which is not set at 0.50' above the top of the '208' pond. Revise grate elevation. ,€E(0/340 due-‘ateZ/, 13) In the curb profile, list the station and elevation of each curb drop, normally listed at its centerline. i¢dQEQ centaur-3 TO Norxe -14) List the pavement elevation at PVI STA 15+75. It is best to be clear which elevation applies to the PVI and which elevation applies to the pavement. #W645.6 rni4PonOV cga o tAir Long Road Plan/Profile Sheet 2 - 15) Existing Driveway at approximate STA 11+85: a: Show the limits of the driveway in the plans, in the vicinity of fl;5 the curb and '208' pond. /4b O GOG4T/00) OF pt/VEW4 b: Provide curb cuts for the driveway. Define by stationing in the profile. Provide and reference a driveway entry detail. : There is a conflict between the existing driveway and the proposed Cc...-. d '208' pond. Address conflict. we free catRa rLy cooR.IDINAT/061. toci477ON to rI1 otiato REVIEW COMMENTS 28 July 1994 REVIEW # 1 PROJECT # P-1743 PROJECT NAME Scottish Addition Page 3 of 3 — 16) List 466 the stat�ioontAwhere the asphalt taper will terminate. -17) At the curb end, provide a 12" long nose down. AAb&Z C»L LtT Drainage Calculations & Basin Map D1) Show the Time of Concentration routes (Tc) in the basin map, and correlate with the Tc's used in the calculations. 44,6Eb T Mg1WS on) 11V77reorels Ziont) /Y44P D2) For basin B, the Tc lengths shown in the computations seem longer than what can be achieved as compared to the basilLsize. Please check. T i°AT// /s $rno opt) Arr,4y/6D ileA'/ti/ L- P/QN, D3) The minimum '208' volume size, based upon impervious area requirements, is listed as 443 c.f. in the calculations. Upon checking the pavement area shown in the basin map, the '208' volume requirements should be 500 c.f. (i e. 11,800 s.f./24). Revise. atiisEA CR1.c.$ tegianie. /961666 zoo, Srzltutk ett4Lt_ -W r: D4) According to the calculations, and what is shown.in the plans, the '208' volume provided for basin B is 488 c.f. However the calculations list a minimum required volume of 663 c.f. Address discrepancy. iCEVIt$EA cAtes Rn/d 5(9446. AAttb w8 3tzuytte-Attt ahiF..Er' ,J "d�Taylor Engineering, Inc. I W. 108 Mission Avenue, Suite 208 Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 928-9971 (PAX) 328-8224 TO: 62-1 /'"/ee. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE 0/ 9/ 92f JOB. NO. r7ea ATTENTION ,1 e2///ry �. RE: 5,0 "(aer; u-fy " p5�A tl @FCEIVED AUG 0 91994 1 WE ARE SENDING YOU [ATTACHED Q UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA O SHOP DRAWINGS COPY OF LETTER SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER rnn FOLLOITING ITEMS: PRINTS CI PIANS ///��� O ANALYSIS C CHANGE ORDER fly S SPECIFICATIONS COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION / — Spa ie-..e.. (4 iQe a;& K�.,.,e., f s /e,--/ gest -, se_ / — - - - c)ro,i-utters .-parf cJ/ 5pcL...clu...7 °1-,..../_,/3 / RO or( /'r�`S 2 S4/ / 2 , U--! / ��0 /�"c 744, {� �'r / — 5, // " / 7Z / C 5 -/ /5 4-, � ,/(4/-3 ( - / v/a,�,g � Ce5 // ft._ 96 /(nOad( /i 4-s , rec.,,----.,,---/CA / — / igc { /u.-,5, v /i°/ yCore Sy � Z / /vL Z - f Dimib4,e /Ero0/74 , veviSPvP THESE ARE SUBMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: FOR APPROVAL L FOR YOUR USE C APPROVED AS SUBMITTED 0 RESUBMIT COPIES FOR APPROVAL C APPROVED AS NOTED fl SUBMIT COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION cl AS REQUESTED n RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS C RETURN CORRECTED PRINTS 0 FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT fl COPY TO SIGNED /t`/G / Cii-C__ OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER C O U N T Y A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director July 28, 1994 Scott Busch, P.E. Taylor Engineering, Inc. W. 106 Mission Ave Spokane, WA 99201 Subject: Scottish Addition Review #1 Spokane County No. P-1743 Dear Scott: A review of the road and drainage plans for this project has been accomplished. Areas of concern to us are indicated in red on the attached prints and calculations. Please make the corrections and resubmit them to this office in order that the review process may proceed. Please provide 2 copies of plans and calculations for the project with each submittal. If you have any questions about this review, please contact us at 456-3600. Thank you. Sincerely, Spokane County Engineers Dean Franz, P.E. Plans Review Engineer encls: Plans (1 set) Calculations (1 copy) Comments (3 pages) Lot Plan Requirements Listing cc: project tile 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 • (509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 'MD: (509) 324-3166 SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PROJECT: Scoii,s,A- AC14;-A6'i-- PROJECT SPONSOR: a A - PROJECT ENGINEER (Road & Drainage Plans) PROJECT SURVEYOR (Plat) YES NO N/A PROJECT # REVIEW # REVIEWER: DATE: P-1743 7-aCa-9¢ TEL # ¥6 -D908 Tt/a.-� r. TEL # 3c23-337 / TEL # GENERAL ITEMS 1. The $100.00 fee for plat review has been paid to Spokane County for this submittal 2. An agreement to pay fees has been submitted to Development Engineering Services 3. The fee agreement has been signed by the project owner or a principal of the developer's firm. If signed by an agent of the owner, written authorization from the owner is attached to the fee agreement 4. Review fee account is current (no invoices over 30 days outstanding) 5. I have noted the plans in, plans out dates on the pink sheet in the file 6. If the project is a mobile home park, were the plans reviewed by Planning? 7. 2 copies of the plans were submitted 8. 2 copies of the calculations were submitted 9. The plans are on 24" x 36" sheets GENERAL ITEMS (cont'd) X 10. The calculations are bound together X X X 11. The plans and calculations are stamped and signed by a Professional Engineer _ 12. The developer has signed and approved the road and drainage plans X 13. Are there any conflicts between the proposed drainfields and any drainage ditches on the plat _ 14. Bowstring calculations by developer are in the file for this review. !C 15. Vertical curve stopping sight distance calculations by developer are in file for this review 16. Horizontal & vertical alignment sight distance calculations by developer are in file for this review The engineer/developer has provided evidence of coordination with the electric utility servicing the project 18a. The file contains a Spokane County Section Map 18b. The file contains a Spokane County Assessors's Map 18c. The file contains an aerial photo of the proposed project area 18d. The file contains a corrected preliminary of the final plat map 19. The project is located in urban boundary area 20. The project is located in the Aquifer Sensitive Area 21. The project plan name matches the plat name 22. Is the entire project located outside of an identified Flood Plain Area? 23. Is the entire project is located outside of an identified Stormwater Management Problem Area? cklintv3.0/Aug93 2 ''e.s 16 0/PE GENERAL ITEMS (cont'd) 24. List any design deviation requests and their status: 25. Locate the Findings and Order for the project and list any unusual conditions: v L-onj Mena 0-w, Ave__ 1.n,prb. i 41 o. 2_, j U or c_R,P• 23. Backcheck of previous comments completed 24. All previous comments adequately addressed 3 cklintv3.0/Aug93 kk ROAD PLANS N 0+e-5 ROAD REQ'D WIDTH DESIGN MIN./MAX. STOPPING SIGHT MI" CURVE NAME CLASS. PAVED R/W TERRAIN SPEED GRADE DISTANCE IIORIZ VERT 1. List any roads that must be designed and constructed on the project. to., R' A ass 36/50' Isla-t 30 o.8/g. 0 ° oo hna whyo-..:y Add 9-i/ As/ato bl- 2. Planning conditions require submission of a landscape plan. (NOTE: Usually associated with PUD's) 3. I have checked the landscape plan against the road and storm drainage design and there are the following conflicts: N 1� 4. The following road plans have a bearing on the design of roads for this project and a copy is in the file: 5 I have sent an "R" value and percolation test request to the Construction Section with soils information and a layout of the project. "R" value test request to Designer (date) . 5 ckliotv3.O/Aug93 Y6 u o IA/Pc ROAD PLANS (cont'd) X X x 6. Is the bench mark shown on the plans? 7. Are stationing equations shown? 8. Is stationing correct (south to north, west to east, reading left to right on the plan)? 9. Are existing utilities shown on the plans (or an information copy of the utility plans submitted)? 10. Are proposed utilities shown on the plans (or an information copy of the utility plans submitted)? Does the note "Any conflicting utilities shall be relocated prior to construction of roads or drainage facilities." appear on the plans? 12. STREET WIDENING 12a. Are curb design sheets provided for widenin of existing streets? 12b. Does the curb design conform to Spokane County Standards of section cross slope (Between 2i; and 4.5a)? 12c. Is there a street cross section shown for widening existing streets? J< 12d. Does the proposed new width match the width required in the Findings and Order? 12e. The cross-section shows: existing R/W proposed R/W future setaside 12f). 100' (min.) pavement taper into project is shown (1) There is adequate R/W for the taper to extend from the new paving width to existing pavement. (2) There is inadequate R/W for the taper to extend from the new paving width to existing pavement; taper extends from existing paving to R/W. 12g. Length of pavement taper out of project meets: WS2 60 for design speeds s 40 mph WS for design speeds > 45 mph ft. min. taper length approved by County Traffic Engineer 12h: Transition from end of curb to existing paving is shown (curb should nose down in 12") 6 ckliutvl.O/Auy93 ' 5 I3cs ROAD PLANS (cont'd) 12i. A 4"-wide, white painted fogline at 12" from the edge of paving is indicated (tapers or tangents) 12j. Are the curb grades above the county minimum of 0.8%? 12k If curb grades are below 0.8%, has a special note 1 been added which requires a licensed land surveyor to verify that the curb forms are at the correct plan grade prior to construction? 13. NEW STREETS 13a. Does the proposed alignment meet Spokane County Standards? vertical slopes vertical curve length horizontal curve radius intersection separation 150' on local access 300' on arterials 13b. The plans show the typical cross section for streets 13c. Does the proposed street width match the Findings and Order? 13d. The cross-section shows: existing R/W proposed R/W future setaside 13e. Does the typical section on the plans meet Spokane County Road Standards? cross slope is shown cross slope is within standards cross slope is correct when checked on profile 13f. Curb type: shown proper type for the road classification meets Spokane County Road Standards for curbs within the public right-of-way consistent with the curb type in the general area 13g. Are the curb grades above the county minimum of 0.8%? ckliotv3.0/Aug93 7 \/e 5 nVk ROAD PLANS (cont'd) 18f. BCR, MCR, and ECR elevations are set so that the superelevation between the intersection and the curbline is banked properly for right-hand turns into and out of the intersection roads (the road slopes from the intersection down to the flowline) _ 18f. BCR, MCR, and ECR elevations at intersections without stop sign control are set so that the superelevation between the intersection and the curbline does not exceed: (ref. AASHTO) 10% (flat terrain) 8% (rolling terrain) 6% (mountainous terrain) fir 19. CUL-DE-SACS _ 19a. The cul-de-sac grades (top of curb) meet county cul-de-sac standards (1% min.) 19b. The cul-de-sac curb is shown in profile 20. INTERSECTIONS 20a. Do the intersections meet the 2% grade requirements? 20b. Wheelchair ramps are provided at intersections with sidewalks 20c. If there is a change of direction at the wheelchair ramps, are the ramps oriented so that: a 5'x5' pad is provided at the top of the ramp? the required 5'x5' landing zone at the bottom of the ramp is located inside of a line drawn 1' inside a lineextended between the curb faces of the adjoining street at intersections? any drainage structures are located outside of the landing zone? 20d. The intersection horizontal sight distance analysis shows that sight triangle encroachment on private property is 2' or less 21. Is there a need for slope easements? 22. Is there a need for erosion protection? ckl iotv3.0/Aug93 9 `lie 5 No 0 /0( ROAD PLANS (cont'd) 23. DRIVEWAYS 23a. Can a driveway slope of 8% or less be maintained between the edge of pavement and the right-of- way? 23b. Can a driveway slope of 12% or less be maintained between the right-of-way and the building setback line? 10 ckliotv3.0/Aug93 Ys N6 - X DRAINAGE PLANS 1. Has a plat map been submitted which shows lot dimensions, street widths, etc.? 2. was a map with contours spot elevations submitted to properly determine drainage basins? 3. Were all existing drainage courses shown? 4. Were all the proposed drainage courses shown? 5. Were Hydrologic calculations submitted for each basin? (Bowstring if area s 10 acres, SCS TR-55 if area > 10 acres) Offsite (50-yr storm if undeveloped, 10-yr storm if developed) Onsite (10-yr storm) Q for entire area Q for roads only INFILTRATION POND Actual pond volume provided DETENTION POND Release to pipe system: contain 50-yr developed release at 50-yr pre -developed secondary overflow to pipe in control structure for 100-yr developed emergency overflow weir for 100-yr developed sump prior to outlet to control structure 1' min. freeboard grassed sides/floor for publicly -maintained ponds sprinkler system for publicly -maintained ponds Retained on site, no drywell: contain 100-yr developed emergency overflow for 100-yr developed 208 SWALES 208 swale floor area, volume requirements 208 swale floor area provided 208 swale volume provided cklistv3.0/Aug93 11 NQ DRAINAGE PLANS •( cone d) NJACEUNDERGROUND GRAVEL GALLERIES 1. .3 void ratio for gravel free space volume is used 2. Perc rate from field test is used to develop outflow rate 3. 10-yr event volume is contained entirely underground 4. 100-yr event volume is contained by a combination of underground storage and above ground storage up to 8" depth 5. 100-yr event volume is contained by a combination of underground storage and above ground storage exceeding 8" depth 5a. Soil mixture is specified for water depth in pond exceeding 8" 6. Entire gallery is wrapped in filter fabric CONVEYANCE Conveyance - pipes ditches gutter flow depth is less than gutter height Backwater - pipes, ditches Headwater - culverts Curb drop/curb inlets on grade (fig 16), sump (fig 17) Grates - sump (fig 15), continuous grade (fig 16) Riprap - stone gradation, pad dimensions 7. Soils type is "pre -approved" (Garrison, etc.,) for drywells without percolation tests 8. Does the drainage report identify the SCS soil groups for the project area and for the proposed roads to be built in the project area? _ 9. The drainage design maintains sheet flow patterns in natural watercourses jC, 10. The drainage design maintains existing sheet flow patterns without concentrating flows cklistvl.0/Aug93 12 411c5 tip 0 DRAINAGE PLANS (cont'd) L _ 11. Does the entire plat lie outside of designated J 100-year Flood Plain Area? 12. Does the entire plat lie outside of Zone "B" of the designated Flood Plain Area? X. 13. -Is the max. street ponding in any part of a Zone "B" less than 1'? 14. Does the plat contain appropriate language limiting the lowermost opening in a structure located in a Zone "B" to not less than 1' above the lowest road elevation? 15. The drainage concept is compatible with planning commission requirements. X16. The difference between present and future flows is retained on the site. INLETS 1. The inlets shown are within the stream flow. 2. Inlets are shown on the low side of a road or at the low point of a vertical curve 3. Curb type inlets are shown at sags and are properly sized. Perimeter does not include the side of the grate against the curb face (all grate types). Perimeter is divided by 2 for calculations where no curb opening (Type 1) is provided. Area = clear area = 2 for Type 1 grates) 4. There are no long curves with flat grades which pose a problem. 5. The centerline road stations, offsets, and invert elevations for all inlets are shown on: plans profile. 6. Grate type is shown on the plan and is acceptable. (Spokane County Standard inlets in county ROW, on private property other inlet type may be specified) (Type 1: D-2; Type 2: D-4) 7. A detail drawing of the grate/curb installation is shown on the plans and includes the 2" depression and transitions as per county standards for grates that are located within county ROW, or referenced to SCRS std. detail D-8 cklietv3.0/Aug93 13 7es Nib DRAINAGE PLANS (cont'd) 3< /C _ 8. A curb cut detail is shown on the plans with the new county back drop with transitions and a 2" depression for curb cuts inside county ROW, or referenced to SCRS std. detail B-15 _ 9. The plans shows acceptable curb cut details and grate details for installations which lie within private road easements. V) 10. If inlets are in a gravel road or a dirt ditch a 6' x 6' A.C. apron is shown around the inlet. , 11. Catch basin or special manhole details are shown or a standard drawing is specified. _V 12. Critical low points in the drainage system have been provided with overflow easements. 208 SWALE SYSTEMS 1. Is the swale located outside a future set aside area? See Findings and Order for where setasides are required. 2 The swale bottom and sides have sod or grass turf specified. 3. Swale side slopes do not exceed a 3:1 side slope. (A 2:1 side slope is allowed if swale depth is less than 12" deep. Should only be allowed where constrained by obstacles) 4. If depth of water from bottom to drywell rim is between 6 and 8 inches, soil mixture has been specified which meets Spokane County Guidelines. Drywell is: located within 8 feet of the curb line, or a maintenance access route and easement are provided 6. Drywell stationing is staggered from the inlet by at least 4' 7. Multiple drywells are located more than 30' (center -center) apart SO di cklistv3.0/Aug93 14 3 MO DRAINAGE PLANS (cont'd) y kl 8. Soil type is appropriate for drywells (perc rate Z 72"/hr) if not: 8a. overflow from a swale at a low point will be directed away from building pads by an identified easement over improved ground an existing natural drainage channel covered by an easement 9. Drywell location does not conflict with underground utilities. 10. Drywell type is specified. 11. Drywell grate type is specified (Type 3 -std. detail D-7) 12. Drywell grate elevation is: below the invert at the curb inlet between 6" and 8" above the swale floor elevation 13. Does the note: "Wrap the drywell with a filter fabric (Amoco 4545 or equivalent)" appear on the plans? 14. Swale floor elevation is: specified between 6" and 8" below the drywell grate elevation at least 6" below the normal gutter flowline at the curb inlet for swale without a drywell at least 8" below the normal gutter flowline at the curb inlet for swale with a drywell 15. Swale floor dimensions are shown minimum area is shown the area matches the required area from the 208 calculation for impervious areas. 16. Easements for the 208: are shown on the drainage plans are shown on the subdivision plat are of adequate size to contain at least 6" freeboard above the max. water surface elevation for the design storm are tied to the lot corners. The side of the swale that is the furthest distance from the street should have a top of swale elevation that is higher than the highest water level of the swale. ckliotv3.0/Avg93 15 DRaiNAGENPLAN (cont'd) 4 18. The invert at the curb inlet is at or above the max. water surface elevation for the design storm 19. Filter fabric is specified for the gravel envelope around the drywell is specified between the drywell and the gravel envelope installation specification is adequate. 20. Irrigation plan for County -maintained 208 swales Lot plans submitted on Mir i,;: 208 LOT PLANS Ai MUro'4% 1. Lot plans are requirdd; submitted on 2. The 208 lot plans show: the lot number, block number, subdivision name, date drawn, scale, and north arrow. dimensions to lot corners drainage easements" setback requirements swale floor elevation swale floor dimensions rim elevation if drywells are present curb cut station, offset, invert and length any drainage ditches shows depth from the top of the curb an attached cross section of the swale or ditch 3. Lot plans have been stamped by a professional engineer on all pages 4. Lot plans are of sufficient scale to maximize the lot size to the 8 1/2" x 11" paper size. (Drawings may be on plain white paper) 5. 208 lot plans were approved on 0/4 CULVERTS AND PIPE SYSTEMS 1. The road culverts are at the low points of stream flow. 2. The headwater was calculated for culvert entrances and is under 2 diameters for culverts under 18" in diameter and 1.5 diameters for culverts greater than 18". 3. There is a minimum of 12" of cover for all culverts and storm sewer pipes ckliutv3.0/Aug93 16 DRAINAGE PLANS (cont'd) 4. The designer has provided a letter from the pipe manufacturer certifying that the intended pipe is suitable for cover less than 3' (PVC), 2' (CMP, RCP), 1' (HDPE/ADS) or the engineer has provided trench details for upgraded pipe bedding for these areas 5. The minimum velocity within the pipe system is 4 feet per second at design flow in a backwater condition. (Note: The County Engineer may permit lower velocities) 6. The backwater calculations show a minimum freeboard of 0.75 feet for each catch basin or manhole. 7. The minimum culvert and pipe slope is 0.5% and all pipes meet or exceed this standard. 8. All angle points in the storm sewer system have suitable access such as a manhole for cleaning. 9. At locations where two different pipe sizes enter the same manhole the 0.8 diameter points of each pipe are at the same elevation. (Note: Exception allowed for drop manholes) 10. Is there any downsizing of pipes in a systems of pipes that are 18" in diameter and smaller. 11. There is a downsizing of pipes in the amount of 3" for a minimum of 100 feet in a pipe system that contains pipes that over 18" in diameter. 12. All pipes in the pipe system are 12" and larger as per Spokane County Standards; (10" pipe that is allowed for connection of inlets to catch basins or drywells, if the length does not exceed 44 LF and the velocity is at least 4 fps). 13. All storm sewer pipes are located a minimum of 5 feet from a rear or side property line and have adequate easements for maintenance. 14. Inlets on the same slope are located so that the maximum width of spread for the gutter flow does not exceed 6' (from curb face for Type "A" or "B", from back of curb for Type "R") 15. The plans and profiles show all culvert pipe types, stations, offsets, lengths, and inverts cklistv3.0/Aug93 17 DRAINAGE PLANS (cont'd) 16. Pipe materials meet county standards for systems that lie within county ROW. (Note: The type of pipe in private systems may be as specified by the design engineer) 17. The culverts shown are properly stationed from centerline stationing. 18. Does the drainage system configuration avoid conflicts with underground utilities? _ 19. Is there a need for energy dissipation on any of the culvert outlets shown on the plans? 20. Is there a need for rip rap around the culvert outlet at any of the culverts as proposed on the drainage plans. 21. The rip rap that is shown for the drainage plans is adequate for the culverts where erosion is a concern and the . engineer has submitted acceptable rip rap design calculations. _ 22. Pipe anchors are shown for pipe grades greater than 15%. 23. There are no instances where water is trapped against a fill with no culvert shown. 24. Profiles and cross sections are shown on the plans for all proposed channels and ditches. 25. Ditches with eroding velocities have a proper lining for erosion protection. 26. Water will properly flow from an existing or proposed ditch on to the pavement as proposed on the drainage plans. _ 27. Where the ditch profile passes from cut to fill the flow has been properly disposed of. 18 cklistv3.0/Aug93 EASEMENTS 1. Adequate drainage easements are shown for maintenance of drainage ditches or pipe systems. 2. There are easements proposed or existing for natural channels which cross the property. 3. An easement was provided where street drainage was diverted onto private property. 4 The perpetual maintenance of private systems has properly been provided for. 5 The maintenance of drainage systems within Spokane County ROW has been properly provided for. 6. Appropriate drainage language has been provided by the reviewing engineer to the surveyor and/or engineer who is involved with the platting work. 7. Pre-existing drainage easements on this parcel are not affected by this plat 8. Overflow easements are provided from swales/ponds located in low points MISCELLANEOUS 1. QC check of review completed (date) (init.) 2. Bond quantities for drainage item calculated (date) (init.) 3. Vertical curve sight distance worksheets done (date) (init.) 4. Vertical curve geometry worksheets done (date) (init.) 5. Drainage volume worksheets done (date) (init.) 6 Stamped road mylars to Permit Tech. (Sylvia/Suzanne) 7. Stamped lot plans to Admin. Asst. (Sandy) ckliutv3.0/Aug93 19 'Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Lard Planning August 5, 1994 Spokane County Engineers Division of Engineering and Roads W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260-0701 RE: Drainage Report for Scottish Addition - Revised ATTN: Mr. Bill Hemmings, P.E. Dear Mr. Hemmings: Principals: Perry M. Taylor, P.E. Stanley R. Stirling Mark A. Aronson, P.E. David C. Larsen, P.R. Associates: Scott M. Busch, P.E. Enclosed are the revised calculations and data for the drainage report for the subject project. Procedures used are as outlined in the "Guidelines for Stormwater Management" as published by the Spokane County Engineers with revisions as of 4-15-86. The format used is as follows: Project Description Soils Topographic Data Rainfall Data Proposed Runoff Control Methods of Disposal Peak Flow, Volume and Disposal Calculations a. Hydrology Computations b. Detention/Retention Storage Capacities c. Inlet Computations Remarks RECEIVED MIS 0 91994 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Also attached are calculations to determine the curb grades along Long Road and Montgomery Avenue. Following your review, I would be happy to answer any questions you may have regarding this report. Sincerely, TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC. Scott M. Busch, P.E. Project Engineer SAJ/j sg/93- I64A/He mmings-080594 OFFICIAL PUBLIC DOCUMENT SPOKANECOUNTY ENGIMa RSOFFICE ORIGINAL PROJECT # P-/7g3_. SUBMITTAL a:. RETURN TO COUNTY ENGINEER W. 106 Mission Ave. • Spokane, WA99201 • (509)328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 DRAINAGE REPORT FOR SCOTTISH ADDITION Prepared: June 6, 1994 By: Sandra Johnson Revised: August 5, 1994 Taylor Engineering, Inc. W. 106 Mission, Suite 206 Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 3258-3371 TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Description Page 1 Methodology Page 1 Soils Page 1 Topographic Data Page 1 Demographic Data Page 1 Rainfall Data Page 1 Methods of Runoff Control Page 2 Methods of Disposal Page 2 Peak Flow, Volume and Disposal Calculations Page 2 a. Hydrology Computations Page 2 b. Detention/Retention Storage Capacities Page 3 c. Inlet Computations Page 3 Remarks Page 4 Vicinity Map Attachment "A" Soils Map Attachment "B" Basin Map Attachment "C" Vertical Curve Calculations Road Widening Calculations Road Plans DRAINAGE REPORT FOR SCOTTISH ADDITION Project Description: This project will provide for the development of approximately 6.19 acres into eight residential lots. It includes the widening of Montgomery Avenue and Long Road to an 18' half width with curb and associated drainage facilities. The project site is located northeast of the intersection of Montgomery Avenue and Long Road in the NE 1/4, Sec.7, T.25N, R.45E. W.M. Methodology: The procedures as outlined in "Guidelines for Stormwater Management" as published by Spokane County Engineers were followed. The Rational Method was used to determine maximum runoff since the basins were less than 10 acres. Soils: (See map, Attachment "B") Soils are classified as GgA - Garrison Gravelly Loam in accordance with the "Soil Survey, Spokane County Washington, 1968". Topographic Data: (See Attachment "C") The site slopes from northeast to southwest at approximately 1%. No significant topographic features are apparent on this site. Demographic Data: The majority of the site consists of unoccupied meadow land. There is one existing residence in the southwest corner and 3 existing buildings. In the developed state, the property will have lots ranging from 14,250 sf. to 1.2 ac. The lots will be served by the existing roads fronting each parcel. New concrete curbs will be installed along the length of the project and new asphalt road widening will accompany the curbs. Rainfall Data: Data used is in accordance with Figure 2, page 6-3 of the "Guidelines for Stormwater Management", by Spokane County Engineers. A 10 year return frequency event is used. The I-D-F chart is included with the calculations of this report. Revised Drainage Report for Scottish Addition Page 1 August 5, 1994 Methods of Runoff' Control: Runoff will be conveyed to the grass percolation areas and drywells by overland flow and gutter flow along the newly widened streets. Curb cuts with aprons are used to pass the flow from the roads to the new drainage facilities. Methods of Disposal: The Bowstring Method was used to determine the size and type of drywells required to dispose of the ten-year event. A total of one Spokane County Standard Type "A" and three Type "B" drywells will be used for disposal of runoff. Peak flow, Volume and Disposal Calculation: a. Hydrology Computations: The site was divided into three basins, (A, B, & C) each with their own grassed percolation area (GPA) for runoff disposal. The following describes each basin and the drainage features associated with them. Basin A - Basin A includes the northwest corner of the site including half of Long Road from approximately STA. 11+50 to the northern plat boundary. Since Basin A utilizes two curb inlets, the basin was divided into two sub -basins and the runoff prorated based on area and total runoff for the entire basin. The residential area contributing to the basin was analyzed with a "C" factor of 0.25 which accounts for half the abutting road. The maximum runoff generated was 0.93 cfs for the design storm. Inlet calculations and drywell sizing are discussed in the following sections. Basing B - Basin B occupies the majority of the development running from the northeast corner to the extreme southwest corner. A portion of Montgomery Avenue (approximately 580' of the north half) and a portion of Long Road (approximately 100' of the east half) also contributes to this basin. This flow was analyzed as part overland flow and part gutter flow using a "C" factor of .20 (approx. 1.3 DU/GA) which generated a maximum runoff rate of 1.47 cfs. All runoff reaches a common low point which feeds a GPA. Inlet calculations and drywell sizing are discussed in the following sections. Revised Drainage Report for Scottish Addition Page 2 August 5, 1994 Basin C - Basin C, the smallest of these basins, includes only the far southeast corner. A small section of Montgomery Avenue approximately 80' long, also contributes. A "C" factor of 0.15 (approx. .2 DU/GA) was used to calculate the runoff and a single GPA and drywell are sized to dispose of the 0.06 cfs generated. Inlet calculations and drywell sizing are discussed in the following sections. b. Detention/Retention Storage Capacities: Grassed percolation areas were calculated to hold the first 1/2" runoff over the entire impervious area for each basin. Grass percolation areas will be six inches deep with drywells installed to dispose of the runoff. The volume required and the volume provided for the 208 area for each basin is summarized on the following table. PEAK FLOW, VOLUME AND DISPOSAL SUMMARY Basin Area (Ac.) Runoff GPA Volume Req'd (c.f.) Volume Provided (c.f.) Drywells # - Type A 2.16 0.93 285 467 Al 0.33 A2 0.60 B 4.94 1.47 499 499 2 - "B" C 0.18 0.06 62 82 The bowstring calculations are used to determine drywell sizing. Either Spokane County Type"A" or Type "B" drywells are specified for each GPA. c. Inlet Computations: Spokane County Standard curb inlets were sized using the Haestad Computer program, Quick Hec-12. Inlets of 3' wide were found adequate for each installation to convey runoff to the GPA's. In locations where the entire half width of the road was removed and replaced, the new cross sectional grade was used to determine inlet capacity. Revised Drainage Report, for Scottish Addition Page 3 August 5, 1994 Remarks: The above described system of stormwater control will provide the quality and quantity controls as outlined in the "Spokane County Stormwater Management Guide" for Scottish Addition. , Revised Drainage Report for Scottish Addition Page 4 August 5, 1994 HYDROLOGY COMPUTATIONS AND DETENTION/RETENTION STORAGE CAPACITIES • • Nn■OT.� .• CCi■� s■■■�■nn CCnfu■■n■.nnn 6 MTh 1N:IHII!ECC I1 ... n■■ ■■■NT-r-r .u■ii■t■ IS s rq rP s MR ■t■tt_nip.___ t Mint - . t.� n , ; . . .YY UM 'C C - ' i ',II•I -1:7-_ s1fir, .- • ■■■■n.�ya • ■■nas _,: �iie, iN::l ` � . ` U ; , • ■ ■n■1 mitsmonanimal -77- ' ■■■ttt'.■nN■■fRN■ ■t■tnfaf■■t■nnnn • 7 4 11111� u r 11r1 .,:. , e. as r , IMMWMUL SW Y■n■a 1p, ■■Ynfi ► tt■tOt► �t R nhmn■, 3 - IlkNW V. .AM it um atte milli .61...11aralialell .1.r „�N .: •1---r NMIMTh I7 i ui u• ■wti■■t�■ia WIIIIIi11Rfl11I111111111N , Nernminummtnanomma- 11111NN111NIu11n ; • H EnigintmL ■ar■ ±- . . T .. IV. .CL1C .E R.' m-fera--- �■ ■.■ rsi �N A "'in ouiwuuinn�ilu ■n■Nn�ttn■nn 4 r m ■■nn■tn■■■t■■■■O W ■■ ■■t■■■■■.■tt■tt■t■ t■Y L L CCt ■■■■■■■■o.■/A �■■tte■--. s i -I I - 'j!� ■ ■ max— SI■l IIIMMEMBeenri 11111 �t■..3Ii.tittttat.' in.7r_eir� . •-I-;.�_ .f-a1.; i--1 ; .. ••. I 20 30 • 40 60 -., .6O 70 . • MU ���, 2 --mri !Dab ate An arnt -TIT-J-._. B0 .90 _"1%00 BOWSTRING METHOD (TEN YEAR STORM DESIGN) DETENTION BASIN DESIGN NUMBER OF DRYWELLS PROPOSED 0 Single (typ 1 Double (type B) 799 Pond floor area Total Area (calc.) (see H1) 2.16 Time of Conc. (talc.) (see H1) 15.80 Composite 'C" (calc.) (see H1) 0.25 Time of Cone. (min) Area (Acres) C. Factor Impervious Area (sq. ft.) Volume Provided (cu. ft.) 208: Outflow (cfs) Area * C" Factor 15.80 2.16 0.25 PROJECT: SCOTTISH ADDITION TIME OF CONCENTRATION (minutes) BASIN: A DESIGNER: SCOTT M. BUSCH DATE: 12-May-94 store (tot 0 surface: 0 u/g: 0 0.0066580 0 1 0.54 41 $2 $3 Time Time Intensity Inc. Inc. (min.) . (sec.) (in./hr.) ($1*60) $4 $5 Q dev. V in $6 $7 V out . Storage (cfs) (cu. ft.) (en, ft.) (cu. ft.) A*CO3) (oatf.MW2) ($5-$6) 15.80 948.07 1.72 0.93 1179 954.38 225 5 300 3.18 10 600 2.24 15 900 1.77 20 1200 1.45 25 1500 1.21 30 1800 1.04 35 2100 0.91 40 2400 0,82 45 2700 0.74 50 3000 0.68 55 3300 0,64 60 3600 0.61 65 3900 0.60 70 4200 0.58 75 4500 0.56 80 4800 0.53 85 5100 0.52 90 5400 0.50 95 5700 0.49 100 6000 0.48 1.72 690 292.81 398 1.21 973 577.01 396 0.96 1153 759.19 394 0.78 1192 800.48 392 0.65 1191 801.21 390 0.56 1192 804.39 388 0.49 1190 804.82 386 0.44 1205 821.93 384 0.40 1208 826.21 382 0.37 1220 840.44 380 0.35 1252 874.35 378 0.33 1292 916.49 376 0.32 1368 994.51 374 0.31 1416 1044.86 372 0.30 1458 1088.74 370 0.29 1466 1098.47 368 0.28 1523 1157.05 366 0.27 1545 1181.49 364 0.26 1594 1231.96 362 0.26 1639 1279.20 360 Te (overland) Te (gutter) Ct= 0.15 I/L2: 0 � 21 = 0 k1A(A) = 520 Z2 : 0 N(A) : 0.35 B : 0 S(A) : 0.006 n : 0 s : 0 Tc (A) : 15.80 d : 0 Ll(B) : 0 Tc (gu) : 0.00 N(B) : 0 S(B) : 0 Tc(A+B) = 15.80 To (B) : 0.0 Tc(tot.) 15.80 1 Intensity 1.72 Tc (total) = Tc (overland) + Tc (gutter) Tc (overland) : Ct*(L1#N/S'0.51'0.6) Ct:0.15 LI : Length of overland Flow Holding : 0.00 N : friction factor of overland flow (.4 for average grass cover) S = average slope of overland flow Te (gutter) = Length (ft.)/Velocity (ft./sec.)/60 8 : Bottom width of gutter or ditch 21 : inverse of cross slope one of ditch Z2 : inverse of cross slope two of ditch d : depth of flow in gutter (estivate, check estimate with Flow) Area : d*B+d`2/2+(Z1+22) Wetted periteter = Bvd+(1/sin(atn(1/Z1))+1/sin(atn(1/22))) Hydraulic Radius = R : Area/Wetted Periteter Velocity : 1.486/ntR'.667ts'.5 Flow : Velocity*Area n : 0.016 for asphalt s = longitudinal slope of gutter Floor outflow = (.36'depth/hr. per sq.ft. floor) * (1 ft depth/12') * (1 hr : 0.00000833 cfs per sq.ft. of floor area Areas 'C' 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.90 0.00 0.75 2.16 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total A Cotp "C' 2.16 0.25 Q=C►I*A: 0.93 Q(est.) 0.00 A= WP R: V: Tc(gu) Q(est) 0 ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR Taylor Engineering, Inc. West 106 Mission Avenue, Suite 206 Spokane, WA 99201 Project: Filename: Designed; Date: SCOTTISH ADDITION subQ.wk1 S. Johnson 12-May-94 SUBBASIN "Q" CALCULATIONS BY PROPORTION SUBBASIN SUBBASIN AREA (s.f.) TOTAL ; PROPORTION TOTAL PROPOR_ BASIN BASIN TIONATE AREA ; ; RUNOFF SUBBASIN RUNOFF (s.f.) I (c.f.s.); (c.f.s.) Al 33890 94090 0.36 0.93 0.33 A2 ; 60200 94090 0.64 0.93 I 0.60 80NSTRING METHOD (TEN YEAR STORE DESIGN) PROJECT: SCOTTISH ADDITION TINE OF CONCENTRATION (minutes) DETENTION BASIN DESIGN BASIN: B DESIGNER: SCOTT N. BUSCH Tc (overland) Tc (gutter) NUMBER OF DEYNELLS PROPOSED DATE: 06-Nay-94 0 Single (typ 2 Double (type B) Ct = 0.15 L2 : 150 0 Pond floor area 21 : 12.5 Total Area (talc.) (see 111) 4.94 1L1(Al : 605 22 : 50 Time of Conc. (calc.) (see El) 19.34 N(A) : 0.35 B : 0 Composite "C" (talc.) (see ill) 0.20 S(A) : 0.006 n : 0.016 Time of Conc. (min) 19.34 s : 0.0039 Area (Acres) 4.94 Tc (A) : 17.30 d = 0.195 C Factor 0.20 Impervious Area (sq. ft.) LI(B) = 0 Te (gu) = 2.04 Volume Provided (cu. ft.) 208: storm (tot 0 N(B) = 0 surface: 0 S(B) : 0 Tc(A+B) : 17.30 u/g: 0 Outflow (cfs) 0 0 2 Te (8) : 0.0 Area * C" Factor 0.99 Tc(tot.) 19.34 ✓lctensity 1.49 01 $2 03 04 05 46 007 Time Time Intensity 9 dev. V in V out Storage Inc. Inc. (min.) (sec.) (in./hr.) (cfs) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (01e60) (A+Ca03) (0utf.42) (05-46) Te (total) = Tc (overland) + Tc (gutter) To (overland) : CCt+(LIxt/S`0.5)1.6) 19.34 1160.47 1.49 1.47 2293 2320.94 -28 Ct : 0.15 LI : Length of Overland Flow Holding = 5.34 Areas "0" 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.94 0.15 0.90 0.75 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total A Comp 'C" 4.94 0.20 9=C*IIA= 1.47 9(est.) = 1.46 A = 1.188281 WP = 12.1972 R = 0.0974 V = 1.23 Tc(gu) : 2.04 9(est) : 1.46 5 300 3.18 3.14 1253 600.00 663 N = friction factor of overland flow (.4 for average grass cover) 10 600 2.24 2.21 1779 1200.00 579 3 = average slope of overland flow 15 900 1.77 1.75 2109 1666.00 443 Tc (gutter) : Length (ft.)/Velecity (ft./sec.)/60 20 1200 1.45 1.43 2284 1841.37 443 B = Bottom width of gutter or ditch 25 1500 1.21 1.20 2265 1821.91 443 21 = inverse of cross slope one of ditch 30 1800 1.04 1.03 2255 1811.95 443 Z2 : inverse of cross slope two of ditch 35 2100 0.91 0.90 2243 1799.81 443 d : depth of flow in gutter (estimate, check estimate with Flow) 40 2400 0.82 0.81 2264 1821.04 443 Area : d*B+d72/2s(21422) 45 2700 0.74 0.73 2262 1819.49 443 Wetted periceter = Bqd+(1/sin(atc(1/ll))+1/sinfatn(1/22))) 50 3000 0.68 0.67 2281 1837.60 443 Hydraulic Radius = R = Area/1ietted Perimeter 55 3300 0.64 0.63 2336 1893.14 443 Velocity : 1.486/n*R'.6674'.5 60 3600 0.61 0.60 2407 1964.44 443 Flow : Velocity+Area 65 3900 0.60 0.59 2546 2102.81 443 m : 0.016 for asphalt 70 4200 0.58 0.57 2633 2189.87 443 s = longitudinal slope of gutter 75 4500 0.56 0.55 2708 2265.06 443 Floor outflow : (.36"depth,/hr. per sq.ft. floor) s. (1 ft depth/12") + (1 h: 80 4800 0.53 0.52 2720 2277.08 443 = 0.00000833 cfs per sq.ft. of floor area 85 5100 0.52 0.51 2823 2379.88 443 90 5400 0.50 0.49 2863 2419.51 443 95 5700 0.49 0.48 2950 2507.50 443 100 6000 0.48 0.47 3033 2589.56 443 JOHSTRING METHOD (TEN TEAR STORM DESIGN) DETENTION 8ASI1 DESIGN NUMBER OF DRTHELLS PROPOSED 1 Single (typ 129 Pond floor area Total Area (calc.) (see H1) Time of Conc. (talc.) (see HI) Composite "C' (calc.) (see HI) Time of Conc. (lin) Area (Acres) C. Factor Impervious Area (sq. ft.) Volute Provided (cu. ft.) Outflow (cfs) Area * C" Factor 0 Double (type 81 0.18 9.91 0.15 9.91 0.18 0.15 PROJECT: SCOTTISH ADDITION BASIN: C DESIGNER: SCOTT H. BUSCH DATE: 12-Hay-94 208: storm (tot 0 surface: 0 u/g: 0 0.0010749 0 0.3 0.03 11 12 13 14 $5 16 Time Time Intensity Q dev. ➢ in ➢ out Inc. Inc. (min.) (sec.) (in./hr.) (cfs) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (11*60) (AtCr13) (Outf.r42) (45-16) 17 Storage 9.91 594.74 2.26 0.06 49 0.64 48 5 300 3.18 10 600 2.24 15 900 1.77 20 1200 1.45 25 1500 1.21 30 1800 1.04 35 2100 0.91 40 2400 0.82 45 2700 0.74 50 3000 0.68 55 3300 0.64 60 3600 0.61 65 3900 0.60 70 4200 0.58 75 4500 0.56 80 4800 0.53 85 5100 0.52 90 5400 0.50 95 5700 0.49 100 6000 0.46 0.09 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 35 49 53 55 56 56 57 58 58 59 61 63 66 69 71 72 74 76 78 80 0.32 0.64 0.97 1.29 1.61 1.93 2.26 2.58 2.90 3.22 3.55 3.87 6.15 8.95 11.43 12.24 15.43 16.93 19.71 22.33 34 48 52 54 54 54 54 55 55 56 57 59 60 60 60 59 59 59 58 58 TIRE OF CONCENTRATION (minutes) Tc (overland) Ct = 0.15 b'''111(4) = 200 N(A) = 0.35 S(A) = 0.0042 Tc(A)= 9.91 LI(B) N(B) S(B) 0 0 0 Tc (B) : 0.0 Tc (gutter) Areas "C. L2: 0 0.00 0.15 Zl = 0 0.00 0.90 Z2 : 0 0.00 0.75 B : 0 0.18 0.15 n = 0 0.00 0.00 s = 0 0.00 0.00 d = 0 0.00 0.00 Total A Camp "C' 0.00 0.18 0.15 Tc (gu) Tc(A+B) : 9.91 ;c(tot.) 9.91 Intensity 2.26 Tc (total) = Tc (overland) + Tc (gutter) Te (overland) = Ctt(L1*11/5'0.5)"0.6) Ct : 0.15 LI : Length of Overland Floe Holding : 0.00 : friction factor of overland flow (.4 for average grass cover) S = average slope of overland flow To (gutter) : Length (ft.)/➢elocity (ft./sec.)/60 8 = Bottom width of gutter or ditch 21 = inverse of cross slope one of ditch Z2 : inverse of cross slope two of ditch d : depth of flow in gutter (estimate, check estimate with Flow) Area = d*B+d"2/2t(Z1+22) Wetted perimeter : Btd+(1/sin(atn(1/21))+1/sin(atn(1/22))) Hydraulic Radius : R = Area/Wetted Perimeter Velocity : 1.486/n*R".667ve.5 Flow = Velocity*Area n : 0.016 for asphalt s = longitudinal slope of gutter Floor outflow = (.36-depth/hr. per sq.ft. floor) * (1 ft depth/12') * (1 bi : 0.00000833 cfs per sq.ft. of floor area 9:CNIIA: 0.06 9(est.) : 0.00 A: HP : R= ➢: Tc(gu) (gest) _ 0 ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR S4,0> 617‘ .4G6/r,otJ F/tea S uF�G ✓oLurw� i E2p B461,) 4 380' x /8 = 1:510 5'[/+ /5t0U 5774 ifroo) J8's i, 200 zo8 ✓oq,= &8ta x ' - z85 G.F Sod c, r'. 6AsIrJ (, 625 xle lL(52 Xis) +Eitax43) - 7 _ /153 3 5r, 208 ✓oc, = /1;83 n- = g"99 cF. ✓ 84€1 J C % . 83 xl8 = 't "t SF zo8 /,1-94' x = 62. e 060030 (0,$) 4- o13861. 9 = ea_ c.,P &10175,-1 ADDrrr o,'J 93-1104 4 5-20- 94- FETEe►-4 N1E. ,evc/A (.E VOWMGS Si NJ A 2w/-i cs EOM) I-1 14CSA, 33') + 0o'x350 = A22tA 7 S,F - A2r_A F1ZD1'1 aOTr0IA AgcA 039 5,F-4) (D. 5 Fr) _ -v-o 599' v01- • ct ME pla O) -4 c5, DG LSc-o+"t' 2A = z(b)(h� = 0.375 S.F. Sim StoPc -VOL_ - = 0.375 S,t=• A-- • r• TCYAc, L, F, = 2 3) 2 330\\ 2 20'J 2 (359 1g VoL,= 0, 375 sF (!82 Fr_ &Si 25Orr- -TOTAL- "VOW ME _ 9. 5 CF: + (0845-C. F. = 467.75 GF. MOO -H 20,om6H ADn7?oki DETiRM t g'WAL.E VDU) MBS, �15tN per. WALE B07t0r1 AREA (2o fx 4 5) = AQaq 90oS,F -VOLUMS F2DtA F 7TDFA A7 -c:A (900 at=,� (p. 5 r) _ -VOL- • 4s0 6F: =L- �� FziDM I,5' st y SLOPr�S 93-7(04 A 5- 20- 9¢ AREA (h) civ..)(0,5) D. 375 sF .g,Da accs . _ 0375 s,FT /L.r ` ro-rA� l,• F• = 2 (20) 2(4SD �37*FT: 00755.F.650 r. `7-0 7Ac.— -VOL-LA va = 45o C + g-9 G F, 499 &-F W 1- W W W_ IS W_ N N N 0 0 0 WOO <<'101176rf Av trno? 1 Derfr_dgfrirKE LS'WALE YULu Hr,`> 43ASIN G; TTOF4 A-2>EA lacc 5F = Arza,A --®- —VEJL1.J-e FOF-1 21'1 At 63o srr(o,sr'r) • (o5 C'.r, —VvL- - Throw Mu iota �t �LOPCS 93-104 A 5-20-94— A ARaA ZCb)(h) t _ 05 1 15 O S� `J' a 26 /l1 ©,375 SF - SIDE, \roL . = 0.375 Si / [.sr= TOTAL L.r. = 2 603 Ct3' 4& -v&c. 0375 5,E kr? rr) = 17ZSc,R —� -Co TA —bLUHE = Co5+ f7.Zhc -. = 82, 25 �� INLET COMPUTATIONS Taylor Engineering, inc. West 106 Mission Xvenue, Suite 206 Spokane, WA 99201 Project: SCOTTISH ADDITION Filename: inlet.wkl Designed: S. Johnson Date: May 20, 1994 INLET SUMMARY BY BASIN AND SUBBASIN INLET BASIN ; DIRECT FLOW ; INLET FLOW OR ; FLOW FROM OTHER DISPOED SUB- TO OTHER FLOW IS BY INLET BASIN INLET INLET FROM (c.f.s.) l (c.f.s (c.f.s.) FLOW INLET BYPASSED FLOW IS BY INLET BYPASSED TO (c.f.s,) Al Al 0.33 0.11 A2 0.44 A2 A2 0.6 - - 0.49 B B 1.47 - - 1.47 0.06 - - 0.06 0.00 0.11 Al 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PROJECT 93-164 HEC12 Version: V2.90 Run Date: 05-16-1994 INLET NUMBER Al LENGTH 3.0 STATION 11+51.67 TOTAL PEAK DISCHARGE = 0.44 (cfs) —� 0.00 Cis FFZUM INit.(�T A2 GUTTER SLOPE = 0.0152 FT/FT PAVEMENT CROSS SLOPE = 0.0200 FT/FT SPREAD AT A SLOPE OF .015 (ft./ft.) AND 0.30 (cfs) IS 2.59 (ft.) XXXXXXXXXX CURB INLET IN A SUMP XXXXXXXXXX P EFFEC. LENGTH (ft) = 5.70 H (ft) = 0.500 DEPTH OF WATER (ft) = 0.10 SPREAD (ft) = 5.20 PROJECT 93-164 HEC12 Version: V2.90 Run Date: 05-12-1994 INLET NUMBER A2 LENGTH 3.0 STATION 12+00 TOTAL PEAK DISCHARGE = 0.60 (cfs) GUTTER SLOPE = 0.0152 FT/FT PAVEMENT CROSS SLOPE = 0.0200 FT/FT SPREAD W W/T SW SW/SX Eo a S'W SE 4.31 1.5 0.35 0.0800 4.0 0.83 3.1 0.171 0.163 XXXXX X XX CURB INLET ON A OONTINUOUS GRADE XY.XX XXXX REQUIRED LENGTH (ft) = 4.9 EFFICIENCY= 0.82 CFS INTERCEPTED= 0.49 CFS CARRYOVER= 0.11 7D INLET 'Ai --MET NUMBER B LENGTH 3.0 STATION 11+25 ,TOTAL PEAK DISCHARGE = 1.47 (cfs) GUTTER SLOPE = 0.0039 FT/FT PAVEMENT CROSS SLOPE = 0.0424 FT/FT SPREAD AT A SLOPE OF .004 (ft./ft.) AND 0.74 (cfs) IS 4.46 (ft.) XXXXXXXXXX CURB INLET IN A SUMP XXXXXXXXXX P EFFEC. LENGTH (ft) = 5.70 H (ft) = 0.500 DEPTH OF WATER (ft) = 0.23 SPREAD (ft) = 5.48 ',LET NUMBER C LENGTH 3.0 STATION 16+50 - TOTAL PEAK DISCHARGE = 0.06 (ofs) GUTTER SLOPE = 0.0040 FT/FT PAVEMENT CROSS SLOPE = 0.0200 FT/FT SPREAD W W/T SW SW/SX Eo a S'W SE 1.26 1.5 1.19 0.0800 4.0 1.00 3.1 0.171 0.191 XXXXXXXXXX CURB INLET ON A CONTINUOUS GRADE XXXXXXXXXX REQUIRED LENGTH (ft) = 1.1 EFFICIENCY= 1.00 CFS INTERCEPTED= 0.06 CFS CARRYOVER= 0.00 ROAD CALCULATIONS - VERTICAL CURVES - ROAD WIDENING VERTICAL CURVE CALCULATION LENGTH OF CURVE BACK GRADE IN % STATION AT PI LOW STATION = 80 = -0.400 = 1175.00 = 1151.67 VERT CORR AT PI AHEAD GRADE IN % PI TANGENT ELEV LOW ELEVATION +0.192 +1.520 499.05 499.18 STATION = ELEV 1135.00 = 499.21 1150.00 = 499.18 1159.93 = 499.18 1175.00 = 499.24 1191.52 = 499.37 1200.00 = 499.46 1215.00 = 499.66 <Shift> <Prt Sc> print <Return> repeat Logo iaDAD :Space Bar> back to menu VERTICAL CURVE CALCULATION LENGTH OF CURVE = 150 BACK GRADE IN % = +0.390 STATION AT PI = 1575.00 HIGH STATION = 1574.05 VERT CORP. AT PI = -0.148 AHEAD GRADE IN % = -0.400 PI TANGENT ELEV = 500.43 HIGH ELEVATION = 500.28 STATION = ELEV 1500.00 = 1524.05 = 1525.00 = 1550.00 = 1560.01 = 1575.00 = 1593.83 = 1600.00 = 1625.00 = 1625.85 = 1650.00 = 500.14 500.22 500.22 500.27 500.28 500.28 500.27 500.26 500.21 500.21 500.13 <Shift> <Prt Sc> print <Return> repeat i ir&oHekV AV - :Space Bar> back to menu aorn&H ADD r t 0 94- 64 A b 2D 94 cc7" ATTAR ENGINEERING, INC. FILE: CURBLONG W. 106 MISSION AVE., SUITE 206 SPOKANE, WA. 99201 PROJECT: SCOTTISH ADDITION DATE: 12-May-94 TYPICAL SECTION DATA: ROAD NAME: LONG ROAD ROAD HALF WIDTH: 18 CURB TYPE: TYPE "B" 11 STATION 12 C/L ELEVATION $3 ; 04 *5 $6 E.P. ; DIST. FROM ; DISTANCE ; MINIMUM ELEVATION ; C/L TO E.P. ; FROM E.P. CURB ELEV. TO CURB ; (4.5% SLOPE FROM E.P. + CURB HEIGHT) 07 08 MAXIMUM ; SELECTED CURB ELEV. ELEVATION (2% SLOPE FROM E.P. + CURB HEIGHT) E9 % GRADE CROSS- SECTION OF ASPH. 1034.79 ; 499.02 ; 498.91 8.94 1067.23 ; 499.15 ; 499.05 8.67 1099.8 ; 499.25 ; 499.11 ; 9.29 1127.47 ; 499.36 ' 499.1 9.09 1159.93 ; 429.46 499.12 ; 8.94 1191.52 ; 499.54 499.3 ; 8.52 1222.67 ; 499.83 499.7 ; 8.68 1255.89 ; 500.15 500.08 ; 7.33 1269.05 ; 500.45 ; 500.36 8.18 1320.76 ; 500.7 ; 500.49 6.84 1348.83 ; 500.78 500.51 6.38 1380.63 ; 500.81 ; 500.62 5.77 1414.37 ; 501.14 ; 500.95 5.04 1445.32 ; 501.72 ; 501.42 5.03 1474.14 502.18 ; 501.96 6.07 9.06 9.33 8.71 8.91 9.06 9.48 9.32 10.67 9.82 11.16 11.62 12.23 12.96 12.97 11.93 498.95 499.08 499.17 499.15 499.16 499.32 499.73 500.05 500.37 500.44 500.43 500.52 500.81 501.28 501.87 499.14 499.27 499.35 499.33 499.35 499.52 499.92 500.28 500.57 500.68 500.69 500.79 501.10 501.57 502.13 499.22 499.35 499.24 499.18 499.37 499.77 500.22 500.37 500.52 500.64 500.79 501.03 501.46 501.87 6604.37 2.68 1.94 3.24 4.23 3.88 3.96 2.62 4.45 3.62 2.47 1.96 2.62 2.96 4.51 AYLOR ENGINEERING, INC. FILE: CURBw0? N. 105 MISSION AVE., SUITE 206 SPOEANE, A. 99201 PROJECT: SCOTTISH ADDITION DATE: 20-Ma,-94 TYPICAL SECTION DATA: ROAD NAME: MONTGOMER➢ AVENUE ROAD HALF WIDTH: 18 CURB TYPE: TYPE "8" 91 STATION 92 C/L ELEVATION 13 94 95 E.P. ; DIST. FROM DISTANCE ELEVATION ; C/L TO E.P. FROM E.P. TO CURB 96 97 98 MINIMUM MAXIMUM SELECTED CURB ELEV. CURB ELEV. ELEVATION (4.5% SLOPE (2% SLOPE FROM E.P. 4 ; FROM E.P. + CURB HEIGHT) ; CURB HEIGHT) 99 % GRADE CROSS- SECTION OF ASPB. 1035.14 499.05 499.05 0 ; 18 ; 498.69 499.10 1059.61 498.95 ; 498.95 0 ; 18 ; 498.59 499.00 1094.23 498.96 498.96 0 ; 18 498.60 499.01 1129.08 499 499 0 ; 18 498.64 ' 499.05 1160.34 ; 498.99 498.99 0 ; 18 498.63 499.04 1194.26 I 498.93 498.87 7.59 ; 10.41 498.85 499.07 1224.55 ; 498.91 ; 498.87 7.36 ; 10.64 ; 498.84 499.07 1267.87 ; 499.14 ; 499 7.95 ; 10.05 ; 499.00 499.21 1300.08 ; 499.24 8.09 ; 9.91 ; 499.24 499.45 1331.01 ' 499.4 ; 499.46 8.12 ; 9.88 499.46 499.67 1365.48 499.57 ; 499.57 8.2 ; 9.8 ; 499.58 499.78 1394.74 499.66 ; 499.56 8.15 ; 9.85 ; 499.56 499.77 1427.89 499.69 ; 499.55 ; 8.31 ; 9.69 499.66 499.87 1457.56 499.9 ; 499.8 ' 8.03 ' 9.97 ; 499.80 500.01 1486.37 500.06 499.96 8.28 9.72 499.97 500.18 1524.05 500.1 500 8.72 9.28 500.03 ; 500.22 1560.01 500.1 500.07 8.43 9.57 500.09 ; 500.29 1593.83 500.13 ; 500.09 8.18 9.82 500.10 ; 500.30 1625.85 ; 500.14 500.14 7.92 10.08 500.13 ; 500.35 1661.01 500.1 I 500.1 ; 7.87 ; 10.13 ; 500.09 ; 500.31 498.86 498.75 495.69 498.8 498.93 499.05 499.22 499.34 499.46 499.6 499.71 499.54 499.96 500.07 500.22 500.28 500.27 500.21 500.09 3026.85 2.85 3.58 4.24 ' 3.45 3.59 ' 2.19 1.87 ; 3.33 ; 4.53 ; 4.22 ; 2.75 ' , 2.32 ; 2,60; 3.28 2.06 2.11 2.40 ; 3.61 4.52 Viebviry MAP AIIAc ,ntAir %" 157 IBS le9 190 191 Rmgm,e.wr °EI" 50/L5 MAP Jraylor :Engineering, Inc. 'I rnu w.+in and Land R- ^l•, ;GwAst-- 3 ;-SE_ U; 9 -» 1 fl& ./acL/( .S 44.. Ai 4/4'0., (P -1745 ) 1n1� ,,,,aim- JoL si�'� b�fate,44, fix r /;'.- sired- - Fes,►., u' Y— 4 Sh,`�c,sa�l`at ai /j nutty. ! ♦�, K-`, 4-),y Le 51- j OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TO: Jeff Forrey, Department of Buildings FROM: Bill Hemmings DATE: October 6, 1994 SUBJECT: B.C.C. resolution # 91-0882 Implementation Attached are the individual lot plans for each lot containing a swale in SCOTTISH ADD, plat# P 1743. Please give the appropriate lot plan to the individual applying for a building permit on the lot, so they can draw their house and approach to scale on the lot. We will need this plan, and the corresponding $1000.00 cash surety, in the form of cash, letter of credit, or savings assignment, before we can issue the approach permit. Also attached are the letter of credit and savings assignment forms. If you desire, we can meet to further discuss this new process. kAjassign.208 "SAMPLE LETTER OF CREDIT' " (USE BANK LETTERHEAD) " (BANK NAME ADDRESS ZIP CODE PHONE # AND OTHER INFORMATION) IRREVOCABLE LEI IER OF CREDIT AMOUNT: $ 1,000.00 NO. BENEFICIARY: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS 1026 W BROADWAY SPOKANE, WA 99260-0170 SUBJECT: LOT BLOCK SCOTTTSH ADD (Plat) PLAT # P 1743 . (Development) Gentlemen: We hereby authorize our irrevocable Letter of Credit in your favor, and authorize you to draw on the (bank), a draft up to one thousand (Dollars) ($1,000.00), for the account of (developer). The draft, drawn under this Letter of Credit, covers the assurance of completion of installation of storm drainage, drainage swales, sod and other work as is incidental and related thereto in accordance with the drawings and specifications as submitted to and approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office on (date), and is to be accompanied by the following documents: written request by Spokane County Engineer's Office to (bank), at the above address indicating non -completion of all or any of the above improvements and that amount of money required to complete such improvements. We hereby agree with the drawer, endorser and bona fide holder of this draft, negotiated under and in compliance with the terms of this credit, that said draft shall be duly honored upon presentation at the (bank), at any time before completion of the above -described improvements or performance, in which event written notice shall be given by Spokane County to the bank. (developer) shall be responsible for any cost incurred by the county in excess of the amount of security. Drafts, drawn under this Letter of Credit, shall bear on their face the words Drawn under (bank) (bank address) Credit No. Dated Bank Name: By: k\j\f\assign.208 (authorized signor) "AGREEMENT" In consideration of the issuance of a building permit for Lot , Block SCOTTISH ADD (plat) plat # P 1743 (Developer) has deposited $1,000.00 with Spokane County as security for full and faithful performance by Developer respecting certain drainage facilities and sod in accordance with the drawings and specifications as submitted to and approved by the Spokane County Engineers Office on (date) 199. Developer hereby agrees that should such drainage facilities and sod not be constructed in accordance with the approved drawings within six months of occupancy, Spokane County may then use the security to bring these facilities and sod into conformance therewith. Developer shall be responsible for any costs incurred by the county in excess of the amount of security. Spokane County agrees to return to Developer any unused funds upon satisfactory completion of these facilities and sod. NAME & ADDRESS TO BE RETURNED TO: (Developer Signature) DATE kU\f\assign.208 ASSIGNMENT For security purposes only, hereby assigns to SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, the following: Savings Certificate Number in the face amount of $1,000.00 and held in and by Bank of Branch (bank address) This assignment is made as security for the full and faithful (developer) performance by (developer) of certain drainage facilities and sod for LOT BLOCK Plat # P 1743 in accordance with the drawings: and specifications Engineers office on (date) , 199 , SCOTTISH ADD (Plat) as submitted to and approved by the Spokane County Any interest benefits accruing under said savings certificate shall remain the property of . (developer) Said savings certificate to be released to (developer) any other party only with the prior written consent and agreement of Spokane County. PROVIDED, FURTHER, the undersigned does hereby authorize (bank) to pay over to Spokane County all or a sufficient portion of the monies in the savings certificate referenced hereinabove upon written documentation being received from the Spokane County Engineer indicating that the purposes for which the savings certificate was assigned have not been fully and faithfully performed as required and a statement of that amount of money which the County Engineer as required and a statement of that amount of money which the County Engineer deems necessary to complete such obligation. Upon receipt of such written documentation, (developer) hereby authorizes (bank) to release to Spokane County that amount of money requested up to the maximum amount in the savings certificate. (developer) shall be responsible for any costs incurred by the county excess of the amount of security. DATED this day of , 199_ President Secretary BANK OF DATED this day of , 199_ DEVELOPER STATE OF WASHINGTON ) :ss County of Spokane On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this day of , 199_ Notary Public in and for the State Wassign.208 of Washington, residing at Spokane ;. r v SCOTTISH ADDITION LOT 3, BLOCK 1 NEW CURB 25' BUILDING SETBACK 10' UTILITY EASEMENT // Gi i L//. /, 3' CURB DROP RT. OF STA. 12+00 --EL 498.79 f ) 6' 500 DRAINAGE EASEMENT ///// i /, 1 //////////J EAST 6' DRAINFIELD � 1 EASEMENT TYPE 'B' DRYWELL W/ TYPE 4 FRAME & GRATE TOP OF GRATE EL 498.28 GRADE DRAINAGE TO FLOW TO S%&LE A 2 3 4 j Taylor Engineering, Inc. f Civil Design and Land Planning W. 108 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 EAST 190.00' BOTTOM OF SWALE EL 497.78 SEE DETAIL 190.00' 4 0 0 0 0 ♦ \• • 7•I7923 '4.�"♦ ♦♦SS ONAL tv• ♦• EXPIRES 01 /08/97 Revised by. SMB M,9 L,00.00S 8/13/9E r 0 Z al • 9 ASPHAL TAPER 30 SCOTTISH ADDITION LOT 3, BLOCK 1 NEW CURB 25' BUILDING SETBACK 10' UTILITY EASEMENT 2 EAST 1 "=30' 128, /I / / 3' CURB DROP RT. OF STA. 1 .+00' _--EL 498.79 771 1 I Na 0 26' TYPE "B" DRYWELL W 4 FRAME & GRATE TOP OF GRATE EL. 498.2 500 DRAINAGE EASEMENT 71 //////// ////////J IGRADE DRAINAGE TO 'FLOW TO SWALE r/ i/ / /T EAST 6' DRAINFIELD EASEMENT TYPE 3 I Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 106 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 190.00' BOTTOM OF SWALE EL 497.78 SEE DETAIL "A" 190.00' 0 0 0 0 • • ■ Ce• 27923 ac blIP •4cisrcaco "� EXPIRES 01 /08/ 5 MS L,00.00S 8/2/94 Drawn by. JLP NEW SECTION DETAIL A TYPICAL 208 SWALE SECTION TOP OF CURB AT CURB CUT. 5' BOTTOM OF SWALE DISTANCE SHOWN ON PLAN TOP OF GRATE EL. 6" ob LOWERED AT CURB DROP TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE t, 3 1 NOT TO SCALE 13" MIN. TO BE GRASS SODDED (TYP.) BOTTOM OF SWALE AS SHOWN ON PLAN "'Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 108 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 Drawn by. JLP 8/2/94 • f- N 0 O Iri rn 5 SCOTTISH ADDITION LOT 4, BLOCK 1 NEW CURB 500'00'15 150.00' 10' PVC CONNECTION PIPE LE- 494.28 (W) LE.- 493.78 (E) L " 30.00' G e O.0187 4 S00 00'15-W BOTTOM EL 49 SEE EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT iIi I .W 1:1-1-1 1 1 �0 -I- o 24' 1°i ,g. , OF SWALE 7.26 :44:4-71 DETAIL• L `Niue i h 25' BUILDING—►{ SETBACK I 10' UTILITY EASEMENT 20' x 20' USA ESMT. 150.00' SP-831-93 9' NEW DRAINAGE EASEMENT 5. (TYP.) GRADE DRAINAGE TO FLOW TO SWALE e�ns"1 �/D- -77 44 Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 106 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-R72A 30' 18' 1 = 30' TYPE 'B' DRYWELL W/ TYPE 4 FRAME & COVER. TOP OF COVER EL 498.82 3' CURB DROP LT. OF STA. 11+45 EL 49&07 TYPE 'E' DRYWELL W/ TYPE 4 FRAME & GRATE. TOP OF GRATE EL 497.78 ASPHALT TAPER ••■■ 7. • • • • s02NAs2�"sitaa *Is ■ sits// ti 96 NEW SECTION DETAIL "A" TYPICAL 208 SWALE SECTION NOT TO SCALE TOP OF CURB AT CURB CUT. BOTTOM OF SWALE J DISTANCE SHOWN ON PLAN TOP OFGRATEEL. 1 6„ aj> .❑. ❑.. ❑. ro&a LOWERED AT CURB DROP TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FiS BLOCK WALL (BY OTHERS) ALLOWABLE ON NORTH, NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST SIDES, OF WESTERLY SWALE ON MONTGOMERY AVE. ONLY. ///TOPTIONAL 13" MIN. p TO BE GRASS SODDED OR SEEDED (TYP.) BOTTOM OF SWALE AS SHOWN ON PLAN jlr Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 106 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 Drawn by: JLP 8/2/94 0 0 5 SCOTTISH ADDITION LOT 4, BLOCK 1 NEW CURB O'00'15"W 0.00' 10" PVC CONNECTION P'E I.E.= 494.26 (W) I.E.= 493.76 (E) L = 30.00' G = 0.0167 4 DRAINAGE EASEMENT BOTTOM OF SWALE EL 497.26 SEE DETAIL "A" SO0'00'15" 150. 25' BUILDING SETBACK 10' UTILITY EASEMENT 20' x 20' USA ESMT. 0' 38' 5' (TYP.) GRADE DRAINAGE TO FLOW TO SWALE jgr Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 106 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 w 18' 30' L 1"=30' C MONTGOMERY AVE. TYPE "B" DRYWELL W/ TYPE 4 FRAME & COVER. TOP OF COVER EL 498.82 -3' CURB DROP LT. OF STA. 11+45 EL. 498.07 TYPE "B" DRYWELL W/ TYPE 4 FRAME & GRATE. TOP OF GRATE EL. 497.76 ASPHALT TAPER • • • ■ et• 27923 44440 ♦ S/ONAL Ea♦♦ • EXPIRES 01 /08/95 Drown by. JLP 8/2/92 DETAIL A TYPICAL 208 SWALE SECTION TOP OF CURB AT CURB CUT. NEW SECTION —/ BOTTOM OF SWALE NOT TO SCALE 13" MIN. TO BE GRASS SODDED (TYP.) BOTTOM OF SWALE AS SHOWN ON PLAN LOWERED AT CURB TO MAINTAIN DRAINA jj Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 108 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 Drawn by. JLP 8/2/94 SCOTTISH ADDITION LOT 8, BLOCK 1 EAST BOTTOM OF SWALE EL 498.70 SEE DETAIL 25' BUILDING SETBACK 10' U11L. ESMNT. NEW CURB C MONTGOMERY AVE. — 3' CURB DROP LT. OF STA. 16+50 EL 499.46 T Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 108 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (609) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 1"=60' PLAT "A,; IRRIGATION DISTRIr_T TRACT TYPE "A` DRYWELL W/ TYPE 4 FRAME & GRATE TOP OF GRATE EL 499.20 EXPIRES 01/08/95 Drawn by. JLP 8/2/94 DETAIL A TYPICAL 208 SWALE SEC11ON NOT TO SCALE TOP OF CURB AT CURB CUT. 5 BOTTOM OF SWALE DISTANCE SHOWN ON PLAN TOP OF GRATE EL. 13" MIN. r 6" 3 .�` t 1 r— I' NEW SECTION i "0 d• TO BE GRASS SODDED (TYP.) .a..0.• O. ;,. —BOTTOM OF SWALE AS SHOWN ON PLAN LOWERED AT CURB DROP TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE A Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 108 Mission Ave, Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 Drawn by, JLP 8/2/94 INLET A TYPE "B" DRYWELL INLET Al 1. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ARE LOCATED 5' BEYOND THE SWALE BOTTOM (TYP.) 2. SWALE DIMENSIONS, INLET LOCATIONS, AND DRYWELL LOCATIONS CAN BE FOUND ON THE ROAD PLANS. 178.00' 4 14,250 S.F. o d DRAINAGE EASEMENT WALE BOTTOM PLAT "A" GREENACRES RIGATION DISTRICT TRACT 3 115.00' 6 1.188 ACS. 25' BUILDING SETBACK 115.00' EAST 535.88' • 1.188 ACS. to Q —1 ESMT. ESMT. 1 115.10' 8 -1-193 ACS. DRAINAGE EASEMENT .T- -77/ - 777" �,(.� -77/ - 7T7 /rr T�� rr7- %/T' T. - 7 --J ..7- -7r. . • -77/ - /.. —,� �,— ,,, —.� _1„— ,,, _;L _ // — - _8" - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - —fff/ OE OE t � FOUND CONC. MO . ♦-- UTILITY STATEMENT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION AND EXISTING DRAWINGS. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEES THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHISICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. TYPE "A" DRYWELL INLET C C EXPIRES 01/08/95 REVISIONS DWN- B.R.S. CK'D• SCALE FEET CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1 FOOT t T.B.M. - "X" ON BOLT OF FIRE HYDRANT AT INT. OF MONTGOMERY AVE. & LONG RD. ASSUMED EL=500.00 DATE: 5-23-94 DATE LEGEND BASIN DESIGNATION BASIN BOUNDARY FLOW ARROW PLAT BOUNDARY NEW DRYWELL NEW CURB INLET NEW 208 SWALE EXIST. BUILDING „! Y Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and band Planning W. 106 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 SCOT I1 SH ADDI 11 ON OVERALL DRAINAGE PLAN SCALE: 1"=50' DRAINAGE CADD ACCESS NAME 93164G15 r."';./w SEC. T25N0 R.45E. INSTALL SPOKANE COUNT 'I/ STANDARD TYPE "B" CURB \ \\, 30' 0 VARIES (,,Y TO 18' SH-5. !LAN VIEW 4..5% MAX, 2" NEW p T CONCRFTE PAVEMENT SE r NI 6 -W.2. h- TACK EDGE ----SAWCUT ASPHALT - 6" CRUSHED SURFACING 'TOP COURSE EEE NOTE MONTGOMERY AVENUE ROAD SECTION .eg N. T.S. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE AND RELOCATE STOP SIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH M.U.T.C.D. AND SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS REMOVE EXIST. ASPHALT TO CENTERLINE AND REPLACE TO GRADES SHOWN STA. 10+35 TO STA. 11+60 SED WESTERLY SWALE LAYOUT Dw . / MONTGOMERY — AVENUE STA„ 10+00 MONTGOMERY STA. 10+00 LONG RD., SEE SHEET 2 • INSTALL 90TAPER FROM EDGE OF EXIST. ASPHALT TO BEGINNING OF NEW CURB 'TO W/ 4" WHITE STRIPE ALONG EDGE. (SEE NOTE 7) OPTIONAL BLOCK WALL (BY OTHERS). ALLOWABLE ON N., NE., AND NW. SIDES ONLY. MAXIMUM HEIGHT= 24" Z < 0 C co CONTRACTOR TO GRADE DRAINAGE TO SWALE BEGIN NEW CURB & ROAD - SECTION, STA. 11+25 PROVIDE 12°' LONG NOSE DOM & END TAPER, 10 510 • CENTERLINE 500 490 • 510 TOP OF • LEFT CURB • • •H 500 • i 490 B.R.S, D C.L. BOTTOM OF SWALE EL. 497.26 SEE TYPICAL 203 SWALE SECTION, SHEET 2. 26' f- (TyP.) '- 19 75.00 - - ----- 0 5/16/94 FXPRFS 2-1923 sTES"C'S' L. 11 DRAINAGE EASEMENT 4 00' 10" PVC CONNECTION PIPE AS PER ASTM D3034 I.E. 494,26 (P) 493,76 ) G 0.0167 SCOTTISH ADDI — INSTALL TYPE ”B" DRYWELL W/TYPE 4 FRAME & COVER 23' LT, OF STA, 11+65 TOP OF COVER EL. 498..82 —20' x USA ESMT. 95.00' 4---INSTALL TYPE "B'' DRYWELL W/TYPE 4' FRAME Sc GRATE 23' LT. OF STA, 11+35 TOP OF GRATE EL. 497.76 CO CO LO ' EAS ',----SAWCUT AND MATCH TO EXIST, ASPHALT STA. 11+60 115.00' INSTALL .3' CURB DROP LT, OF STA. 11+45 SEE DETAIL, SHEET 2. GRADE DRAINAGE TO SWALE. CURB DROP . STA, 11+45 498,.07' • flNlSH GRAPE EXISI GROU or Taylor Engineering, Civil Design and Land Planning W. 10-3 Mission Ave. Spokane, WaslitnErLon 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (309) 328-0224. 13 +:0039 • 4•1',0;').,,,,,4•8,740 ••• 777- 14 r ROAD r) 0 0 OFFICE OF COUNT ION CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE AND i RELOCATE EXISTING MAILBOXES (—Jr., 1, 1 i i- 7 tr) 0 0 0 0 (I) 25 RUti DING SETBACK 10' UTL ESMT, -06 -EDGE OF EXIST. f\-\c-;PF-I,L\LT ROAD DRAINAGE --- EASEMENT • 115,88" -------------------- ---- 777' 7-77 -- "X" ON BOLT OF FIRE HYDRANT AT INT. OF MONTGOMERY AVL Lc. LONG RD. ASSUMED 8 'W- 41: NSTALL 3' CURB DRO1 LT, OF' STA, 16+50 SEE DETAIL„ qHFET 2, CONTRACTOR ID REMOVE AND DISPOSE_ OF EXIS11NG BARBED WIRE FENCE 0 0 e,s1IFIEER W. 1026 Broadway Ave, Spokane Wa, 99260 456-3600 (1) 3' CURB STA. .16+50 EL. .499.46 WNERS APP SIG ATURE OVA1 "—BOTTOM OF- SWALE EL, 498,70 SEE TYPICAL 203 SEC°110N, SHEET 2, --END NEW CURB Se ROAD SECTION, STA. 16+60.83 PROVIDE 12 LONG NOSE DOWN & BEGIN TAPER. 100° TAPER FROM END OF NEW CURB TO EDGE OF EXST, ASPHALT Wei 4" WHITE STRIPE ALONG EDGE. SEE NOTE 7) -INSTALL DRYWELL WiTYPL 4 r-RAME GRATR 2.5' I T. OF STA, 1+60 TOP OF GRATE EL, 499.20 17 • 50 25 F CONTOUR INTERVAL =1 FOOT 50 1 00 C;ONSTRUCTON NOTES: FEET • 1..THE TOP COURSE FOR ALL SECTIONS SHALL BE 5/3" MINUS CRUSHED SURFACING AND SHALL CONFORM TO ALL W.SDO.T, 1994 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL ACP SHALL BE CLASS B" IN ACCORDANCE WITH WS.D.OT. 1994 STANDARD SPECIFICATINS WITH MIX DESIGN APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY. 3. CURB INLET SHALL. BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C 473 (AASHTO M 199) (St ASTM C 890. TOP SURFACE TO BE BROOM FINISHED AND ALL EXTERNAL EDGES NOT LABELED SHALL BE TROWELLED WITH 1 /4" RADIUS EDGER. 4, CURBS INSTALLED AT LESS THAN 0.8% GRADE SHALL REQUIRE WRITTEN CERTIFICATION BY AN INDEPENDENT, LICENSED SURVEYOR AS -To THE ACCURACY OF THE CURB FORM PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR, FORMS SHALL BE At 25° STATIONS. CFRTIFICATioN SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER. 5. DRYWELL AND GRAVEL ENVELOP': SHALL BE WRAPPED WiTH A FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR APPPROVED EQUIVALFN T) IN ACCORDANCE W HSPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD PLAN E-1. 6. CON IF:ACTOR SHALL RELOCATE ANY UTILITIES, WHERE CONFLICTING, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES,. 7, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 4" WIDE FOGLINE, PAINTED WHITE„ FOGLINE SHALL BE PAINTED 12' FROM [DOS OF ASPHALT. 3.. ALL EXIS'ING ASPHALT REMOVE SHALL BE SAWCUT. rt,Trm p .„al • rcors7)7g. 1C7e,1 -.44{ 19.1 • 96 s.c-oTIIsH ADDITION MONTGOMERY AVENUE STA. • 0+00.00 10 STA. 16+60.8 lfl • SHEET CADD ACCESS NAME 7 9314R-15 r-14?) TOP OF CURB AT CURB CUT, NEW SECTION - BOTTOM OF SWALE DISTANCE SHOWN ON PLAN TOP OF GRAIL- EL, .o a'rQ i- LOWERED AT CURS DROP TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE TYPICAL 208 SWALE SE NOT TO SCALE ( R TACK EDGE --- SAWCU T EXIST, ASPHALT `" CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE SEE NOTE < t OPTIONAL BLOCK WALL (BY OTHERS). ALLOWABLE ON NORTH, NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST SIDES, OF WESTERLY SWALE ON MONTGOMERY AVE. ONLY. 3 MAXIMUM HEIGHT= 24" 13" MIN. TO BE GRASS SODDED OR SEEDED (TYP.) - BOTTOM OF SWALE AS SHOWN ON PLAN reoN 30' 18' VARIES TO 13 SEE PLAN VIEW 4,5% MA .. R/W 3` SWALE STREET INSTALL SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" CURB T_ 2" NEW ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE NOTE 2 LONG ROAD E.:el ION NOT TO SCALE B.R.S. lgned S.A.J. Checked 29, END VIEW 3' 3' 4 TOP VEVY CURB DROP NOT TO SCALE NORMAL GUTTER LANE N- DEPRESSED GUTTER LINE 4" THICK PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE. SEE NOTE 3. LIMIT OF DEPRESSION STA. 10+00 LONG RDo= STA. 10+00 MONTGOMERY A SEE SHEET 1. LONG ROAD Date 5/13/94 5/16/94 6/2/94 510 w Ow z 0 f CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL -- 5° GRAVEL TRANSITION. FOR EXISTING DRIVEWAY. INSTALL 100° TAPER FROM EDGE OF EXISTING ASPHALT TO BEGINNING OF NEW CURB W- ` 4" WHITE STRIPE ALONG EDDGE. (SEE NOTE 7) 777- BEGIN NEW CURB & ROAD - SECTION, STA. 11+80 PROVIDE 12" LONG NOSE DOWN & END TAPER. GRADE DRAINAGE TO FLOW TO SWALE, CENTERL NE 10 OE. awl 6' DRAINFIELD -- / EASEMENT / BOTTOM OF SWALE- EL. 497.78 SEE . TYPICAL 208 SWALE SECTION THIS SHEET. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTING DRIVE WITHIN LIMITS OF SWALE. 11 0'V.C. Arms Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land. Planning W. 105 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington- 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 Approved . Date 12 SEC 7 T.25N., R.45E. W.M. INSTA ALL TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 FRAME AND GRATE 25' RT. OF STA. F 1+92 TOP OF GRATE EL. 498.28 INSTALL. 3° CURB DROP RT. OF STA. 12+00. SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET /' I -DRAINAGE LL,.- EASLMU'1 T 1.0 • 1,3 N. 00'00'15' 0.OU' 2 10' U T I L .-1 EASEMENT SCOTTISH ADDITION 3' CURB DROP STA, 12+00 EL. 498.79 +.004 OFFICE OF. EDGE OF EXi3T. ASPHALT ROAD 4 2�' BUILDING SETBACK 14 8 MANE COUNTY ENGINEER W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane Wa. 99260 456-3600 Approved _ Daft® -- .N TALL FOGLINE 200' RADI STA. STA, 15�— �_� 45 14+27. 45 TO RT, OF . EXTENDED ��.a (SEE NOTE 7) -PAVE FROM EXTENDED CURB UNE TO EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT, 18' RT. OF STA. 15+ 27, 45 EXTENDED. —END NEW CURB "' A 14+80 W/ 12`z NOSE DOWN OWNER'S APPROVAL SIG ATURE SCAL 1"=5 ° xF IZ. VERT. 41 SCALE CONTOU FEET INTERVAL ='1 FOOT T.B.M. - "X" ON BOLT OF ,FIRE HYDRANT AT NT. OF MONTGOMERY AVE. LONG RD. ASSUMED EL. =500.00 CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. THE TOP ,COURSE FOR ALL SECTIONS SHALL BE 8" MINUS CRUSHED SURFACING AND SHALL CONFORM TO ALL W.S.D.O. T.. 1994 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL ACP SHALL BE CLASS B" IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. 1994 STANDARD SPECIFICATINS WITH MIX DES1ON APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY. 3. CURB INLET SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C 478 (AASHTO M 199) & ASTM C 890. TOP SURFACE TO BE BROOM FINISHED AND ALL LXTERNAL EDGES NOT LABELED SHALL BE -TROWELLED WITH 1/4" RADIUS EDGER. 4. CURBS INSTALLED AT LESS THAN 0.8Z GRADE SHALL REQUIRE WRITTEN CERTIFICATION BY AN INDEPENDENT„ LICENSED SURVEYOR AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THE CURB FORM PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR, FORMS SHALL BE AT 25' STATIONS. CERTIFICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER. DRYWELL AND GRAVEL ENVELOPE SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH A FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR APPPROVED EQUIVALENT) IN ACCORDANCE SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD PLAN B-1. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE ANY U 11-1 TIES, WHERE CONFLICTING, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 4" WIDE FOGLINE, PAINTED WHITE. FOGLUNE SHALL BE PAINTED 127 FROM EDGE OF ASPHALT. 8. ALL EXISTING ASPHALT REMOVED SHALL BE SAWCUT. L F45 R Y' r yij (i) LONG ROAD STA. 10+00 TO STA. 14+80 CA ACCESS NAME: 93164R25 0 O O 0 M O O N.00°00' 15" E. 30' 0 O ca op FOUND REBAR O 0 0 0 FOUND REBAR 2426 25' BUILDING SETBACK 285.00' 1 28,500 S.F. EAST EAST 630.11' 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 2420 285.00' 2 28,500 S.F. EAST 285.00' O 0 0 0 190.00' 10' UTIL. ESMT. 2414 33'? DRAINAGE EASEMENT — 6' DRAINFIELD EASEMENT --EAST-� EAST 195.00' O O O O O O Z 3 19,000 S.F. 0 O 190.00' 95.00' 4 14,250 S.F. DRAINAGE EASEMENT 30' A 176.00' 125.00' FOUND REBAR 0 N 17917 0 O 0 10 95.00' 0 0 0 10 N O 0 O O En 95.00' 5 23,750 S.F. 17929 20' x 20' USA ESMT. 0 O 0 to CO (0 S00'00' 15" W 115.00' 6 1.188 ACS. 18003 25' BUILDING SETBACK 95.00' KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT GREER CONSTRUCTION, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, HAS CAUSED TO BE PLATTED INTO LOTS, BLOCKS, AND STREETS THE LAND SHOWN HEREON TO BE KNOW AS SCOTTISH ADDITION, BEING A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 7, T.25N., R.45E., W.M. IN SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: TRACT 8 OF SHORT PLAT NO. SP 831-93 AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF SHORT PLATS, PAGE 74; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON. CONDITIONS: SIDE YARD AND REAR YARD SETBACKS SHALL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUESTED UNLESS THESE SETBACKS ARE SPECIFICALLY DRAFTED ON THIS FINAL PLAT. THE SETBACKS INDICATED ON THIS PLAT MAY BE VARIED FROM IF PROPER ZONING APPROVALS ARE OBTAINED. THE PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM, PURSUANT TO THE WATER PLAN APPROVED BY COUNTY AND STATE HEALTH AUTHORITIES, THE LOCAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT, AND WATER PURVEYOR, SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, . AND THE APPUCANT SHALL PROVIDE FOR INDIVIDUAL DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE AS WELL AS FIRE PROTECTION TO EACH LOT PRIOR TO SALE OF EACH LOT AND PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR EACH LOT. DUPLEXES ARE PROHIBITED. THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) IN INTEREST AGREE TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY TO PLACE THEIR NAME(S) ON A PE. IIIION FOR THE FORMATION OF ULID BY PETITION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW 36.94, WHICH PEIIIION INCLUDES THE OWNER(S)' PROPERTY; AND FURTHER NOT TO OBJECT BY THE SIGNING OF A PROTEST PETITION AGAINST THE FORMATION OF A ULID BY RESOLUTION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW 36.94 WHICH INCLUDES THE OWNER(S)' PROPERTY, PROVIDED, THIS CONDON SHALL NOT PROHIBIT THE OWNER(S)'ITI OR SUCCESSOR(S) FROM OBJECTING TO ANY ASSESSMENT(S) ON THE PROPERTY AS A RESULT OF IMPROVEMENTS CALLED FOR IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FORMATION OF A ULID BY EITHER PETITION OR RESOLUTION METHOD UNDER RCW CHAPTER 36.94. USE OF PRIVATE WELLS AND WATER SYSTEMS IS PROHIBITED. EACH DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE DOUBLE -PLUMBED FOR CONNECTION TO FUTURE AREAWIDE COLLECTION SYSTEMS. SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC APPLICATION APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF PERMITS BY THE HEALTH OFFICER, THE USE OF INDIVIDUAL ON -SITE SEWAGE SYSTEMS MAY BE AUTHORIZED. UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PLAT ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE SERVING UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, RECONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF UTILITIES. TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO INSPECT SAID UTILITES AND TO TRIM AND/OR REMOVE BRUSH AND TREES THAT MAY INTERFER WITH THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF SAME. NO BUILDINGS SHALL BE ERECTED WITHIN THE 6' DRAINFIELD EASEMENT, AS SHOWN HEREON. ANY DRAINFIELD ON LOT 3 AND .4 SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF TEN(10) FEET FROM THIS EASEMENT AND THE EAST PROPERTY LINE OF LOT A. THE DRAINFIELD EASEMENT SHALL BE VACATED AT SUCH TIME AS LOT A IS CONNECTED TO PUBUC SEWER OR THE EXISTING DRAINFIELD IS RELOCATED ENTIRELY ON LOT A. THE EXISTING DRAINFIELD SHALL BE RELOCATED ENTIRELY ON LOT A WHEN IT IS DEEMED INEFFECTIVE. i 0 0 0 S00'00'15"W 115.00' 0 7 0 to 1.188 ACS. 18015 —10' UTIL. ESMT. S00'00'15"W 115.11' 8 1 .1 93 ACS. 18027 DRAINAGE EASEMENT 115.00' EAST 535.88' EAST 535.93' 115.00' 115.88' O O 0 O 0 10 S.00'05'41" E. 0 FOUND REBAR MONTGOMERY AVENUE FOUND CONC. MON. SPOKANE COUNTY DOES NOT ACCEPT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF MAINTAINING THE DRAINAGE COURSE ON PRIVATE LOTS WITHIN DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OR FLOODPLAIN AREAS, NOR THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGE, WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING, BUT NOT UMITED TO, INVERSE CONDEMNATION TO ANY PROPERTIES DUE TO DEFICIENT CONSTRUCTION AND/OR MAINTENANCE OF DRAINAGE COURSES IN DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, AS PLATTED AND SHOWN HEREON, WHICH ARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING, OPERATING AND MAINTAINING DRAINAGE PONDS AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES TO DISPOSE OF RUNOFF, ARE HEREBY GRANTED TO SPOKANE COUNTY AND THE PUBLIC. SPOKANE COUNTY AND ITS AUTHORIZED AGENTS ARE HEREBY GRANTED THE RIGHT TO INGRESS AND EGRESS TO, OVER, AND FROM SAID EASEMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE_ OF INSPECTION AND EMERGENCY MAINTENANCE OF 208 SWALES AND OTHER DRAINAGE FACILITIES, IF NOT PROPERLY MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. SPOKANE COUNTY DOES NOT ACCEPT THE RESPONSIBILITY TO INSPECT OR MAINTAIN THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES, NOR DOES THE COUNTY. ACCEPT ANY LIABILITY FOR ANY FAILURE BY THE LOT OWNER(S) TO PROPERLY MAINTAIN SUCH AREAS. IF THE PROPERTY OWNER FAILS TO MAINTAIN THE SURFACE PATH OF NATURAL OR MAN-MADE DRAINAGE FLOW, OR THE DRAINAGE SWALE, A NOTICE OF SUCH FAILURE MAY BE GIVEN TO THE PROPERTY OWNER. IF NOT CORRECTED WITHIN THE PERIOD INDICATED ON SAID NOTICE, SPOKANE COUNTY HAS THE RIGHT TO CORRECT THE MAINTENANCE FAILURE, OR HAVE IT CORRECTED, AT THE EXPENSE OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. THE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THIS PLAT SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING OPEN AND MAINTAINING THE SURFACE PATH OF NATURAL OR MAN-MADE DRAINAGE FLOW OVER AND ACROSS THEIR RESPECTIVE PROPERTIES. THE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THIS PLAT SHALL MAINTAIN ALL WATER QUALITY TREATMENT SWALES ("208 SWALES") AND DRAINAGE DITCHES SITUATED ON THEIR RESPECTIVE PROPERTIES, AND ANY PORTION OF A 208 SWALE SITUATED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO THEIR RESPECTIVE PROPERTIES, WITH A• PERMANENT GROUND COVER AS SPECIFIED ON THE CURRENT APPROVED PLANS ON FILE AT THE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE. THE PROPERTY OWNERS MAY INSTALL APPROVED SHRUBBERY AND/OR TREES WHICH DO NOT OBSTRUCT THE FLOW AND PERCOLATION OF STORM DRAINAGE WATER IN THE 208 SWALE AND DRAINAGE DITCHES AS INDICATED IN THE CURRENT APPROVED PLANS ON FILE WITH THE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE. THE PROPERTY OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL INFORM EACH SUCCEEDING PURCHASER OF ALL DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY AND OF HIS RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTAINING SURFACE DRAINAGE PATHS AND SWALES WITHIN SAID EASEMENTS. ANY BUILDING THAT IS CONSTRUCTED ON' A LOT IN THIS PLAT SHALL BE SET AT SUCH AN ELEVATION SO AS TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ANY DRAINAGE ENTRY POINT TO THE BUILDING (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO A. WINDOW WELL, A WINDOW UNPROTECTED BY A WINDOW WELL, OR A DOORWAY). SAID POSITIVE DRAINAGE SHALL CONSIST OF A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 3% AWAY • FROM THE BUILDING FOR .A DISTANCE OF A LEAST 10 FEET FROM THE BUILDING.: THE LOTS SHALL BE GRADED SO , THAT EITHER a) ALL RUNOFF IS ROUTED AWAY FROM THE BUILDING, AND CONVEYED OVER THE LOT TO A NATURAL DRAINAGE SWALE OR APPROVED DRAINAGE FACILITY, OR b) DRAINAGE INTERCEPTED ON THE LOT IS DISPOSED OF ON THE LOT IN AN APPROVED DRAINAGE FACILITY. THE APPROVED DRAINAGE • FACILITY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS ON FILE AT THE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE. ANY REVISIONS TO THE APPROVED DRAINAGE PLANS MUST BE-AP,?ROVED BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF SAID REVISIONS. FINAL PLAT 0 SCQTTISH AD BEING A PORTION OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 4-5 EAST,W. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 50 25 50 100 SCALE SCALE: 1" = 5 LEGEND FEET' = SET #5 REBAR W/CAP LEINWEBER 13775 0 LOT CORNERS = FOUND MONUMENT. AS = FOUND #5 REBAR W/CAP LS 13775 BASIS OF BEARING THE CENTERLINE OF MONTGOMERY AVENUE IS ASSUMED "EAST" PER SP-831-93 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE AFORESAID OWNERS HAVE HEREUNTO SET THEIR HANDS UPON THE DATES SHOWN. GREER; Ci`_ CTION, INC. PRESIDENT DATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF ) SS. ON THIS DAY OF 1994, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE TATE OF WASHINGTON DULY COMMISSIONED AND SWORN, PERSONALLY APPEARED '41111'' -"dr../ f . . TO ME KNOWN TO BE THE PRESIDENT , OF GREER CONSTRUCTION, INC., THE CORPORATION THAT EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF SAID CORPORATION, FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED, AND TO OATH STATED THAT HE IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE SAID INSTRUMENT. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRI I I EN. eaQe,W. W NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR TH STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT Spolci MY COMMISSION EXPIRES I i " go 'di AUDITORS CERTIFICATE D THIS ;e-FDA O 19 r ; M. IN BOOK - OF =At'IPA GE-` AT THE, REQUEST OF COUNTY AUDITOR DEPUTY COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES EXAMINED . AND : APPROVED . THIS ___ DAY OF £c4Q QV* / ! COUNTY ENGINEER EXAMINED =AND, APPROVED THIS - r ..DAY OF COUNTY. PLANNING DEPARTMENT EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS /217 DAY. OF COUNTY, HEALTH DISTRICT st,. EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS I DAY 0 COUNTY ASSESSOR EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS COUNTY:., COMMISSIONERS . THIS :FINAL:•PLAT,:WAS APPROVED AND ACCE SPOKANE' COUNTY, WASHINGTON, , ON THIS ,L 4 DAY OF COUNTY TREASURER I DO. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL TAXES WHICH HAVE BEEN LEVIED AND BECOM CHARGEA ' .. AGM THE D SHOWNWfTH1 IS . MAP HAVE BEEN FULLY PAID THIS .DAY19 r DIRE CTOF`, SPOKANE COUNTY IVISION OF UTILITIES d «dL1 r4i.� , 19 SPOKANE COU ENGINEER ay,° 1,47 ,y yrVrs.y POKANE COUNTY HEALTH OFFICE POKANE COUNTY S S,' BY DEP D'BY C C MMISSIO E S OF STII•ee.o r ° SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. EXPIRES • . 10=..03-95 ,t• CHAIIMAN, SPOKANE CCOMMISSIONERS EASURER BY DEP ACCURACY STATEMENT (WAC ` 332-130-1.00) THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED USING A LIETZ SET-4 TOTAL STATION, A ZEISS 'LEVEL, AND A 100. FOOT CHAIN, HORIZONTAL DISTANCES ARE BASED ON THE NATIONAL; GEODETIC SURVEY CALIBRATION AT FELTS FIELD. FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS USED WERE AS PER WAC 332-130-090 PART C. "'Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land . Planning (509) 328-3371 FINAL ' 'PLAT ; OF `SCOTTIS.H ` ADDITION SCALE: =50' 1 1 CADD ACCESS NAME: 93164P15 R/W 30' R/W 18' SEC. 7, T.25N., R.45E. W.M. INSTALL SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" CURB VARIES 9' TO 18' -of SEE PLAN VIEW 2% MIN. 4.5% MAX. hirentlinen• 2" NEW ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE NOTE 2. TACK EDGE SAWCUT EXIST. ASPHALT 6" CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE SEE NOTE 1 MONTGOMERY AVENUE ROAD SECTION N.T.S. SP-8F B REMOVE EXIST. ASPHALT TO CENTERUNE AND REPLACE TO GRADES SHOWN STA. 10+25 TO STA. 11+60 DW MONTGOMERY ---- AVENUE STA. 10+00 MONTGOMERY AVE.= STA. 10+00 LONG RD. SEE SHEET 2 CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE AND RELOCATE STOP SIGN IN ACCORDANCE 'MTH M.U.T.C.D. AND SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD& ,,, SP-831 38' 30' 30' R=30' TBM 75.00' INSTALL 3' CURB DROP LT. OF STA. 11+25 SEE DETAIL, SHEET 2. GRADE DRAINAGE TO SWALE 10 11 BOTTOM OF' SWALE EL 497.26 SEE TYPICAL 208 SWALE SECTION, SHEET 2. DRAINAGE EASEMENT 4 ii ' 12 0 0 0 0 5 10" PVC CONNECTION PIPE AS PER ASTM D3034 I.E.= 494.26(W) I.E.= 493.76 (E) L = 30.00' G = 0.0167✓ T.B.M. - "X" ON BOLT OF FIRE HYDRANT AT INT. OF MONTGOMERY AVE. & LONG RD. ASSUMED EL.=500.00 SCOTIISH ADDITION INSTALL TYPE "B" DRYWELL W/TYPE 4 FRAME & COVER 50LI D LLD 23' LT. OF STA. 11+65 TOP OF COVER EL 498.82 0 0 0 0 SAWCUT AND MATCH TO EXIST. ASPHALT STA. 11+60 6 INSTALL TYPE "B" DRYWELL W/TYPE 4 FRAME & GRATE 23' LT. OF STA. 11+35 TOP OF GRATE EL 497.76 13 0 0 0 0 V) 14 CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXISTING MAILBOXES (TYP.) 7 25' BUILDI'JG SE I BACK 10' UTIL. ESMT. 115. 0' EDGE OF EXIST. ASPHALT ROAD 8 DRAINAGE EASEMENT 5.90' 115.88' 5' TYP. INSTALL 3' CURB DROP - LT. OF STA. 16+50 SEE DETAIL, SHEET 2. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BARBED WIRE FENCE 15 16 17 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ....... ...... ..... ......... ......... ......... ......... ...... ........ ........ ......... .... ...... ......... ....... ... .... ........... ......... ........... ...... ........... ......... ......... ......... ......... ...... ......... ......... .............. ......... ......... ......... ........ ........... .......... ........ ....... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ........ ......... ...... ........ ....... ......... ....... ...... ........ ......... ......... ..:...... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ........ ....... ......... ......... ......... ....... ........ ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ........ ......... ...... ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ...... ........ BOTTOM OF SWALE EL 498.70 SEE TYPICAL 208 SWALE SECTION, SHEET 2. END NEW CURB & ROAD SECTION, S. 16+60.88 PROVIDE 12 LONG NOSE DOWN & BEGIN TAPER. -INSTALL 100' TAPER FROM END OF NEW CURB TO EDGE OF EXIST. ASPHALT W/ 4" WHITE STRIPE ALONG EDGE. (SEE NOTE 7) IN TALL TYPE "A" DRYWELL W E 4 FRAME & GRATE 2 ' LT. OF STA. 16+60 TOP OF GRATE EL 499.20 50 25 0 50 100 SCALE FEET CONTOUR INTERVAL =1 FOOT CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. THE TOP COURSE FOR ALL SECTIONS SHALL BE 5/8" MINUS CRUSHED SURFACING AND SHALL CONFORM TO ALL W.S.D.O.T. 1994 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL ACP SHALL BE CLASS B" IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. 1994 STANDARD SPECIFICATINS WITH MIX DESIGN APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY. 3. CURB INLET SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C 478 (AASHTO M 199) & ASTM C 890. TOP SURFACE TO BE BROOM FINISHED AND ALL EXTERNAL EDGES NOT LABELED SHALL BE TROWELLED WITH 1/4" RADIUS EDGER. 4. CURBS INSTALLED AT LESS THAN 0.8% GRADE SHALL REQUIRE WRITTEN CERTIFICATION BY AN INDEPENDENT, LICENSED SURVEYOR AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THE CURB FORM PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR, FORMS SHALL BE AT 25' STATIONS. CERTIFICATION SHALL BE SUBMI i 1 LD TO THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER. 5. DRYWELL AND GRAVEL ENVELOPE SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH A FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR APPPROVED EQUIVALENT) IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD PLAN B-1. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE ANY UTILITIES, WHERE CONFLICTING, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 4" WIDE FOGLINE, PAINTED WHITE. FOGLINE SHALL BE PAINTED 12" FROM EDGE OF ASPHALT. 8. ALL EXISTING ASPHALT REMOVED SHALL BE SAWCUT. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-456-8000 ......... ......... ......... ....... .. ......... ......... ......... ......... ........ ........ ....... ....... ..... ......... ....... ... ......... ......... ......... ......... ....... .. ......... ......... ...... ......... ....... ......... ......... . ........ .......... ........ ...... ... ...... .......... ......... ........ ...... ......... ........ ......... ......... .............. ........ ........ ..... ....... . ......... ........... ......... .............. ............. .......... ......... ............ ......... ....... ...... ......... ... ........ ......... ...... ....... ....... ......... ......... ..... ........ ........ ........ ......... ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 510 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .... ..... ......... ......... .... ........ ........ ..... ......... ......... ...................... ........ ...................... ....................... ...... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .......:. ...... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ... .. ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ....... .. ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ....... ......... .... CENTERLINE ..... ......... ......... .............. ......... �--c. EXISTING ROAD ....... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... . ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 500 490 150'V.C. 510 TOP: OF LEFT CURB 500 L rj-vi - 0030 0 to r ct 3' CURB: DROP STA. • 11 +25 EL.:497..99. 1/ 0 0 ua n .1 o -.0040 to CO 00 Ct tD FINISH GRADE 490 +.0039 L.to o � 0 o io c5 O a W. W W; N EXIST. GROUND 0 0 to 1- Z 0 00 N.0) O 0 .0 W. to W bJ ;._IC.DOCUMENT SP KAN'E'CDu-i•EGINEERSOFFCE 3' CURB • DROP ( STA.:1:6+50 EL 499.46 ✓ AI RECEIVED r[ NGINEER . . . 0'9 1994 a SPOKANE COUN1Y ENpINAF ft Drawn Designed Checked Date B.R.S. 5/13/94 S.A.J. 5/16/94 D.C.L. 6/2/94 „atilt III 111 4* • • h~� gi W. •0 ■ • �44* -o t• *th 27923 ki .FS 'roisr°° G�e1 •jS�/ONAL t�j• ,o r Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 106 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane Wa. 99260 456-3600 OWNER'S APPROVAL SIGNATURE SCALE i1ORIL VERT. 1 "=10' 1" = 50' SCOT11SH ADDITION MONTGOMERY AVENUE STA. 10+00.00 TO STA. 16+60.88 ROAD SHEET No. Date By Ckd. Appr. Revisions FXPIRFS 01 /08/95 I 1 Approved Data Approved Date DATE CADD ACCESS NAME: 93164R15 SEC. 7, T.25N., R.45E. W.M. NEW SECTION TOP OF CURB AT CURB CUT. 5' BOTTOM OF SWALE DISTANCE SHOWN ON PLAN TOP OF GRATE EL. ❑`'13 . O ,,p • Ql LOWERED AT CURB DROP TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE )011 3 1 13" MIN. (Cr'(•<efs TO BE GRASS SODDED (TYP.) BOTTOM OF SWALE AS SHOWN ON PLAN TYPICAL 208 SWALE SECTION NOT TO SCALE TACK EDGE SAWCUT EXIST. ASPHALT R/W 30' R/W 18' 6" CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE SEE NOTE 1 VARIES 8' TO 13' SEE PLAN VIEW 2% MIN. 4.5% MAX. 3' SWALE 4 STREET INSTALL SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" CURB 2" NEW ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE NOTE 2 LONG ROAD SECTION NOT TO SCALE END VIEW 3' TOP VIEW 3' CURB DROP NOT TO SCALE NORMAL GUTTER LINE DEPRESSED GUTTER UNE 4" THICK PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE. SEE NOTE 3. UMIT OF DEPRESSION STA. 10+00 LONG RD.= STA. 10+00 MONTGOMERY AVE. SEE SHEET 1. LONG ROAD •TBM A ,.4 30' 10 • 30' INSTALL TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 FRAME AND GRATE 25' RT. OF STA. 11+92 TOP OF GRATE EL 498.28 INSTALL 3' CURB DROP RT. OF STA. 11+51.67. SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET B 1 6' DRAINFIELD EASEMENT BOTTOM OF SWALE EL 497.78 SEE TYPICAL 208 SWALE SECTION THIS SHEET. 11 INSTALL 3' CURB DROP RT. OF STA. 12+00. SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET DRAINAGE r*— EASEMENT 3) to 12 SP-88-553 113 N. 00'00'15" E. 2 10' UTIL EASEMENT �— SCOTTISH ADDITION „w 13 EDGE OF EXIST. ASPHALT ROAD t-25' BUILDING SETBACK 14 1 A 15 INSTALL FOGLINE W/ 200' RADIUS C STA. 14+27.45 TO RT. OF C STA. 15+27.45 EXTENDED (SEE NOTE 7) PAVE FROM EXTENDED CURB UNE TO EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT, 18' RT. OF STA. 15+27.45 EXTENDED. END NEW CURB STA. 14+80 W/ 12" NOSE DOWN 50 25 0 50 100 P SCALE FEET CONTOUR INTERVAL =1 FOOT T.B.M. - "X" ON BOLT OF FIRE HYDRANT AT INT. OF MONTGOMERY AVE. & LONG RD. ASSUMED EL=500.00 CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. THE TOP COURSE FOR ALL SECTIONS SHALL BE 5/8" MINUS CRUSHED SURFACING AND SHALL CONFORM TO ALL W.S.D.O.T. 1994 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL ACP SHALL BE CLASS B" IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. 1994 STANDARD SPECIFIC/VMS WITH MIX DESIGN APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY. 3. CURB INLET SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C 478 (AASHTO M 199) & ASTM C 890. TOP SURFACE TO BE BROOM FINISHED AND ALL EXTERNAL EDGES NOT LABELED SHALL BE TROWELLED WITH 1/4" RADIUS EDGER. 4. CURBS INSTALLED AT LESS THAN 0.8% GRADE SHALL REQUIRE WRI I I tN CERTIFICATION BY AN INDEPENDENT, LICENSED SURVEYOR AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THE CURB FORM PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR, FORMS SHALL BE AT 25' STATIONS. CERTIFICATION SHALL BE SUBMIT ILD TO THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER. , 5. DRYWELL AND GRAVEL ENVELOPE SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH A FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR APPPROVED EQUIVALENT) IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD PLAN B-1. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE ANY UTILITIES, WHERE CONFLICTING, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 4" WIDE FOGLINE, PAINTED WHITE. FOGUNE SHALL BE PAINTED 12" FROM EDGE OF ASPHALT. 8. ALL EXISTING ASPHALT REMOVED SHALL BE SAWCUT. 'CALL BEFORE YOU DIG' 1-456-8000 f 510 CENTERLINE 500 c. ROAD EXISTING 80'V.C. 490 . in + .0152 4 510 -.0040 .e. in + p m m� V — TOP OF RIGHT CURB 500 CURB :RETU - GRADE BRE) + 0 •� �....> u,.... m EL 499.66 E.V.C. STA. GRADE :BRE N • . • FINISH 1- v,.. GRADE +.0046 ', `, _ r....... t )... +:01 __ :::0 c 0 :.w 4 "' x3 GROUND _*I W49aig 'n .+ .,ice L o—— wEXIST 3CURB C STA. :11 EL- 498.51 ROP .... 1.67 :::: ` CU _ ...> :::::: R0P w.. :: . . EL 498. +00 9 Iou Ili o°oc‘ M. eUs°+ ®'Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and land Planning Yl: W 108 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 OFFICE OF OWNER'S APPROVAL F ROAD Drawn Date • �® ® •-0 4 ••0 ♦ ♦ONAI 4, ,� '""s',,*r cy♦♦ y�� ^, �` 27923 �``' 12 a w • t SCALE �. SCOTIISH ADDITION B.R.S. 5/13/94 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1 =50 HOR/Z. " E� SHEET Designed W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane Wa. 99260 " VERT. 1 =10 LONG ROAD STA. 10+00 S.A.J. 5 16 94 / / 456-3600 TO STA. 14+80 2 Chocked mar/®®4 Approved Date No. Date By Ckd Appr Revision D.C.L. 6/2/94 Approved Date SIGNATURE DATE CADD ACCESS NAME 93164t25 t;s'k��9,er :,,^rati�fit 111 .4 R/W INSTALL SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" CURB R/W 30' 18' VARIES 9' TO 18' SEE PLAN VIEW 2% MIN. 4.5% MAX. 2" NEW ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE NOTE 2. SAWCUT EXIST. ASPHALT 6" CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE SEE NOTE 1 MONTGOMERY AVENUE ROAD SECTION N.T.S. S1 -88-553 REMOVE EXIST. ASPHALT TO CENTERLINE AND REPLACE TO GRADES SHOWN STA. 10+25 TO STA. 11+60 B MONTGOMERY AVENUE STA. 10+00 MONTGOMERY AVE.... STA. 10+00 LONG RD. SEE SHEET 2 DW ct SP-831 J 30' TBM A (TYP.) 75.00' INSTALL 3' CURB DROP LT. OF STA. 11+25 SEE DETAIL, SHEET 2. GRADE DRAINAGE TO SWALE 10 11 BOTTOM OF qWALE EL. 497.26 ✓ SEE TYPICAL 208 SWALE SECTION, SHEET 2. 4 DRAINAG EASEME 12 2 0 0 t!) SEC. 7, T.25N., R.45E. W.M. (C)Ai'd SCOTTISH ADDITION INSTALL TYPE "B" DRYWELL E 4 FRAME & GRATE LT. OF STA. 11+50 OF GRATE EL. 497.76 •✓ Ci) p1 �� awn ��5 Ca 6 c 0 0 0 cn 20' x 20' USA ESMT. _._ 9 3 95.00' SAWCUT AND MATCH TO EXIST. ASPHALT STA. 11+60 115.00' INSTALL TYPE "II" DRYWELL W/TYPE 4 FRAME & GRATE 23' LT. OF STA_ 11+35 TOP OF GRATE EL 497.76 13 14 Rio S, F 7 115,00' BOTTOM OF SWALE EL 498.70 ✓ SEE TYPICAL 208 SWALE SECTION, SHEET 2. 0 0 0 cn fb EDGE OF EXIST. ASPHALT ROAD 15 8 DRAINAGE EASEMENT F-10' UTIL. ESMT. 1 115.88' 5' (TYP. INSTALL 3' CURB DR LT. OF STA. 16+50 SEE DETAIL SHEET 2. 16 Marsi •L isaarrAR '"tTmamo .3vmarai6atzall` 4,,'w:;i�fre'"Iatlal .iFIix,,:.t? i..'TA,: grail. w.4 W .a.}I _.�9_.::a.'",21 ua .m.AT "ra !�w AC , E ;j...tii ; GAT IUI`; ! IJT+-,IC TRACT la �. END NEW CURD ,OAD SECTION, STA. le 60.88, ao INSTALL (555 TitkPI.7.R FROM END OF ` W CURB TO EDGE OF EXIST. ASPHALT , 0 17 4 17 — ,7,— INSTALL TYPE "A" PRYAELL 1TYPE 4 FRAME': i2 CRAM LT. 01 STA. 16-i-60 TOP OF GRATE EL 491Y 510 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... CENTERLINE ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... EXISTING ROAD 500 50 25 0 50 100 SCALE FEET CONTOUR INTERVAL =1 FOOT T.B.M. - "X" ON BOLT OF FIRE HYDRANT AT INT. OF MONTGOMERY AVE. gar LONG RD. ASSUMED EL. =504.00 CONSTRUCT1O,N NOTES: 1. THE TOP COURSE FOR ALL SECTIONS SHALL BE 5/8" MINUS CRUSHED SURF/ACING AND SHALL CONFORM TO ALL W.S.D.O.T. SPECS. 2. ALL ACP SHALL BE CLASS B" IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECS, WITH MIX DESIGN APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY. 3. CURB INLET SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C 478 (AASHTO M 199) & ASTM 0 890. TOP SURFACE TO BE BROOM FINISHED AND ALL EXTERNAL EDGES NOT LABELED SHALL BE IROWELLED WITH 1 /4" RADIUS EDGER. 4. CURBS INSTALLL �=D AT I FSS PHAN 0.8n SHALL REQUIRE WRITTEN CERTIFICATION BY AN INDEPENDENT) `,c'''' "'' SURVEYOR AS TO THE ACCURACY OF -I-HE OURB FORM. PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR, FORMS SHALL_ BE CHECKED AT 25° STATIONS. CERTIFICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER. �: � �� k 1 1 r T 490 • rY 7 V • J. 1 �r 510 TOP: OF LEFT CURB 500 490 0, - 0030 . 6_ 0 • FINISH GRADE • pj, .r1/4 . 4 600. 150' V.C. fe Imo) �. 0 EXIST. 'GROUND- 1 4; t 0 By Ckd. Appr. ovftlon r B.R.S. Design d S.A.J. Cale c d Date 5/13/94 5/16/94 +1;,:4c,q..1`#ru'IR2 a :,h4g41 . ..a.47,`,4.;.1e,.:_:... re.^.::uXa ter ra 27923 44;17o/sr°G; • ZONAL E�� 51 • • 0 w 0 Crl (0 • trirho, q 'd rn •I, 0 a :. :w • co cc co co 0 CO s. . r W .13 ACM Naylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 106 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 roved OFFICE OF SPOKAI,,E CO PITY E QI EE W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane Wa. 99260 456-3600 Appro v d :PI: OWNER'S APPROVAL DATE .64 • iI SEC. 7, T. 25 N., R. 45, E.W.M. NEW SECTION TOP OF CURB AT CURB CUT. 5' BOTTOM OF SWALE DISTANCE SHOWN ON PLAN r- TOP OF GRATE EL LOWERED AT CURB DROP TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE f- 6" 13" MIN. IL TO BE GRASS SODDED (TYP.) BOTTOM OF SWALE AS SHOWN ON PLAN TYPICAL 208 SWALE SECTION NOT TO SCALE SAWCUT EXIST. ASPHALT R/W 30' R/W 18' 6" CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE SEE NOTE 1 VARIES 8' TO 13' SEE PLAN VIEW 2% MIN. 4.5% MAX • STREET INSTALL SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "E" CURB )>/> '' 2" NEW ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE NOTE 2 LONG ROAD SECTION NOT TO SCALE TOP VIEW CURB DROP NOT TO SCALE NORMAL GUTTER UNE DEPRESSED GUTTER UNE 4" THICK PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRL.IE. SEE NOTE 3. UMIT OF DEPRESSION STA. 10+00 LONG RD.= STA. 10+00 M ON TGOM ERY AVE. SEE SHEET 1. LONG ROAD INSTALL TYPE " B" DRYWELL V' ITH TYPE 4 FRAME AND GRATE 25° RT. OF STA. 11+92 TOP OF GRATE EL. 498.28 INSTALL 3' CURB DROP RT. OF STA. 11 +51.6 7. SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET B 10 A 0„ .„ 6' DRAINFIELD EASEMENT BOTTOM OF SWALE v EL 497.78 SEE TYPICAL 208 SWALE SECTION THIS SHEET. 11 12 J C P 5/ a. INSTALL 3° CURB DROP RT. OF STA. 12+00. SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET DRAIN EASE 3 Sp-88-553 100.00' GE ENT[ 2 Li 10' UTIL— EASEMENT SCOTTISH ADDITION 13 EDGE OF EXIST. ASPHALT ROAD A —_�'-7/�'-- /„— / 7 100.00' —25' BUILDING SETBACK 14 1 6"W-- ) 15 PAVE FROM EXTENDED CURB LINE TO 'EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT END NEW CURB STA. 14+80 122K Nam D 16 17 50 25 50 100 SCALE FEET CONTOUR INTERVAL =1 FOOT T.B.M. - "X" ON BOLT OF FIRE HYDRANT AT INT. OF MONTGOMERY AVE. LONG RD. ASSUMED EL.=500.00 CONS IKUCT1ON NOTES: 1. THE TOP COURSE FOR ALL SECTIONS SHALL RE 5/8" MINUS CRUSHED SURFACING AND SHALL CONFORM TO ALL W.S.D.O.T. SPECS. 2. ALL ACP SHALL BE CLASS B" IN ACCORDANCE WITH `V.S.D.O.T. SPECS. WIT1-1 MIX DESIGN APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY. 3. CURB INLET SHALL BE CONS IRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AS C 478 (AASHTO Mi 199) & ASTM C 890. TOP SURFACE TO BE BROOM FINISHED AND ALL EXTERNAL EDGES NOT LABE I FD SHALL BE I NOW`"'L LED WITH 1 /4" RADIUS EDGER. 4. CURBS INSTALLED AT LESS THAN 0.8% SHALL REQUIRE WRITTEN CERTIFICATION BY AN INDEPENDENT SURVEYOR AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THE CURB FORM. PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR, FORMS SHALL 3E CHECKED AT 25' STATIONS. CERTIFICATION SHALL P?E SUBMITTED .I ED TO THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER. 10 ENTERLIN c. EXISTING ROAD 500 • 490 510 TOP. .OF RGGHT: CUR 500 Y LU i et m rt 0 w m [t ' +. -0040() 0040. .. pia °-)CN • .N v K °�` , \1 aw\ :� :O :c 'o �v. 0,, r 80°V.C. 0. c\. . . �. HH • 490 fly w 0 ,e 0 z 0 !pi 0 z • • • 2 • f) O� 3 N • • • • +.0152 ...m::: FiNISI v tri Q •0) LO.. 0 •• . 0) 0) -4- ::'w'� GRADE w CO et 0 c0 o Lr_ :::0 +•.0140•••wv, +.0046 0 w : EXIST. GROUND* • . . . . . . — --Tor 0) w : t'E195FN. ISMIZElk 4,37i'''!4'3Hti+:-:N..':^>'..:!$i?�h �' it 41.11,N3.::j.#*,... :l•.P. Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 108 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 p rov d to U"AP" LifC+: 7111161181 OFFICE OF S OKAN ' COU TY ENGINEER W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane Wa. 99260 456-3600 tlY�,d' '.vtf::j.tI 1x ST,7"ttt to !{Fl4 `CI+iT`�F2�{b i;i4•31.1 OWNER'S APPROVAL SIGNATURE DATE r=50' rr(7' 'T 1 "=10' R/W R/W 30' SEC. 7, T.25N., R.45E. W.M. Sat Sep 17 11: 21: 24 1994 18' VARIES 9' TO 18' SEE PLAN VIEW INSTALL SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" CURB 2% MIN. 4.5% MAX. 1161 2" NEW ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE NOTE 2. TACK EDGE SAWCUT EXIST. ASPHALT 6" CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE SEE NOTE 1 MONTGOMERY AVENUE ROAD SECTION N.T.S. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE AND RELOCATE STOP SIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH M.U.T.C.D. AND SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS. REMOVE EXIST. ASPHALT TO CENTERLINE AND REPLACE TO GRADES SHOWN STA. 10+35 TO STA. 11+60 DW/ MONTGOMERY - AVENUE ,,. STA. 10+00 MONTGOMERY AVE.= STA. 10+00 LONG RD. SEE SHEET 2 INSTALL 90' TAPER FROM EDGE OF EXIST. ASPHALT TO BEGINNING OF NEW CURB TO W/ 4" WHITE STRIPE ALONG EDGE. (SEE NOTE 7) o O0 t TBM CONTRACTOR TO GRADE DRAINAGE TO SWALE BEGIN NEW CURB & ROAD SECTION, STA 11+25 PROVIDE 12 LONG NOSE DOWN & END TAPER. 10 38' 5' (TYP. 75.00' 11 BOTTOM OF SWALE EL. 497.26 SEE TYPICAL 208 SWALE SECTION, SHEET 2. DRAINAGE EASEMENT 4 0 0 0 0 INSTALL TYPE "B" DRYWELL W/TYPE 4 FRAME & GRATE 23' LT. OF STA. 11+35 TOP OF GRATE EL. 497.76 12 10" PVC CONNECTION PIPE AS PER ASTM D3034 I.E.= 494.26 (W) I.E.= 493.76 E) L = 30.00' G = 0.0167 INSTALL TYPE "B" DRYWELL W/TYPE 4 FRAME & COVER 23' LT. OF STA. 11+65 TOP OF COVER EL. 498.82 5 SAWCUT AND MATCH TO EXIST. ASPHALT STA. 11+60 6 INSTALL 3' CURB DROP LT. OF STA. 11+45 SEE DETAIL, SHEET 2. GRADE DRAINAGE TO SWALE 13 14 SCOTTISH ADDITION CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXISTING MAILBOXES (TYP.) 7 25' BUILDI SETBACK 10' UTIL ESMT. 115.b0' LO 0 0 0 0 0, VG EDGE OF EXIST. ASPHALT ROAD 8 DRAINAGE EASEMENT 5.90' 115.88' (TYP.) INSTALL 3' CURB DROP - LT. OF STA. 16+50 SEE DETAIL, SHEET 2. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BARBED WIRE FENCE 15 16 T.B.M. - "X" ON BOLT OF FIRE HYDRANT AT INT. OF MONTGOMERY AVE. & LONG RD. ASSUMED EL.=500:00 17 -„� ___. _ BOTTOM OF SWALE EL. 498.70 SEE TYPICAL 208 SWALE SECTION, SHEET 2. END NEW CURB & ROAD SECTION, STA. 16+60.88 PROVIDE 12" LONG NOSE DOWN & BEGIN TAPER. INSTALL 100' TAPER FROM END OF NEW CURB TO EDGE OF EXIST. ASPHALT W/ 4" WHITE STRIPE ALONG EDGE. (SEE NOTE 7) IN TALL TYPE "A" DRYWELL W TYPE 4 FRAME & GRATE 2 ' LT. OF STA. 16+60 TOP OF GRATE EL. 499.20 ....... ...... ......... ...... ........ ......... ... .... ....... ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... ..... ......... ....... ......... ......... ..... ......... ......... ...... ......... .... ......... ......... .... ....... ....... ... 510 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ........ ......... ...... ......... ......... ......... ....... ......... ......... ........ ......... ....... ......... ............. ......... ......... ..... ......... ......... 50 25 0 50 100 SCALE FEET CONTOUR INTERVAL =1 FOOT CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. THE TOP COURSE FOR ALL SECTIONS SHALL BE 5/8" MINUS CRUSHED SURFACING AND SHALL CONFORM TO ALL W.S.D.O.T. 1994 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL ACP SHALL BE CLASS B" IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. 1994 STANDARD SPECIFICATINS WITH MIX DESIGN APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY. 3. CURB INLET SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C 478 (AASHTO M 199) & ASTM C 890. TOP SURFACE TO BE BROOM FINISHED AND ALL EXTERNAL EDGES NOT LABELED SHALL BE TROWELLED WITH 1/4" RADIUS EDGER. 4. CURBS INSTALLED AT LESS THAN 0.8% GRADE SHALL REQUIRE WRITTEN CERTIFICATION BY AN INDEPENDENT, LICENSED SURVEYOR AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THE CURB FORM PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR, FORMS SHALL BE AT 25' STATIONS. CERTIFICATION SHALL BE SUBMI i ILD TO THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER. 5. DRYWELL AND GRAVEL ENVELOPE SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH A FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR APPPROVED EQUIVALENT) IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD PLAN B-1. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE ANY UTILITIES, WHERE CONFLICTING, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 4" WIDE FOGLINE, PAINTED WHITE. FOGLINE SHALL BE PAINTED 12" FROM EDGE OF ASPHALT. 8. ALL EXISTING ASPHALT REMOVED SHALL BE SAWCUT. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-456-8000 . ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ....... ....... ......... ........ ......... ..... ......... ......... ......... ....... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ...... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ....... ......... ......... ........ ...... ......... ......... ....... ......... ...... ......... ........ ......... ...... ........ ........ ....... ...... ......... ....... ....... ......... ...... .... ......... ........ .......... ........... ............... ....... ....... ......... ......... ......... ....... ....... ....... ......... ......... ...... ......... ....... ....... ........ ........ ......... ......... ........ ........ ......... ......... ....... ......... ......... ......... ........ ......... ........ ....... ...... ....... ......... ......... ...... ............ ......... ......... CENTERLINE ......... ....... ......... ....... ......... ........ ........ ........ ......... ......... ........ ......... ......... ....... ......... ......... ....... ......... ......... ......... ........ ...... ....... ........ ......... ..... ....... ......... ........ ........ ...... ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... ........ ......... /--, EXISTING ROAD 500 490 ........ ..... ....... ........ ....... ......... ....... ...... ....... ......... .. ........ ....... ...... ......... ....... .. ......... ........ ........ ....... ...... ......... .... ....... ......... ........ ....... ......... ........ ....... ........ ......... ....... ......... ......... ...... ......... ...... ......... ........ 150' V.C. 510 0 TOP : OF EFT CURB 500 w z z C3 w m 0 0 1ci -csI ......... 3' : CURB : DROP c STA. .11 +45 EL :498.07: 0 0 T 0040 co FINISH GRADE 1- V) cn 0 +.0039 0 0) 0 w 0 w 0 0 z OFFICIAL PUB IC DOCUMENT (0 EXIST. GROUND 0 m F- z 0 490 J w 0. 0 0n cV 0 0 tn rn• 0 0 0 J w 0 m w� 3' CURB DROP STA. 16+50 EL 499.46 ......... ......... ......... ......... ........ ....... ORIGI . PROJECT u • • P'�� SJBMITTAL Y . RETURN -TO COUNTY ENGINEER PRELI NAR No. Date By Ckd. Appr. Revisions Drawn B.R.S. Deslgned S.A.J. Checked D.C.L. Date 5/13/94 5/16/94 6/2/94 EXPIRES 01 /08/95 APw Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 106 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane Wa. 99260 456-3600 Approved Date Approved Date OWNER'S APPROVAL • SIGNATURE DATE SCALE HORIL VERT. 1 =10 1"=50' SCOTTISH ADDITION ROAD MONTGOMERY AVENUE STA. 10+00.00 TO STA. 16+60.88 SHEET Ti L ;;3 ss 'NAME: 93164R15 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER INSTALL TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 FRAME AND GRATE 25' RT. OF STA. 11+92 TOP OF GRATE EL. 498.28 INSTALL 3' CURB DROP RT. OF STA. 12+00. SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET 100.00' 10' UTIL— EASEMENT BOTTOM OF SWALE EL. 497.78 SEE SCOTTISH ADDITION TYPICAL 208 SWALE. SECTION THI S�HEET�. td112 ,1-„, 1� 8o sw k24324� 11 ��'• 12 13 Taylor Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning W. 106 Mission Ave. Spokane, Washington 99201 (509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 Approved Date 3' CUR 4: STA. • EL. 49 • DROP 1:2+00 .79 EXISTING AD OFFICE OF _ EDGE OF EXIST. ASPHALT ROAD 100.00' 25' BUILDING SETBACK SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane Wa. 99260 456-3600 Approved Date SCALE HORIL VERT. NEW SECTION TOP OF CURB AT CURB CUT. BOTTOM OF SWALE DISTANCE SHOWN ON PLAN TOP OF GRATE EL. f6„ ❑;.o tt .o, o, LOWERED AT CURB DROP TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE TI \ BOTTOM OF SWALE AS SHOWN ON PLAN TYPICAL 208 SWALE SECTION NOT TO SCALE TACK EDGE SAWCUT EXIST. ASPHALT 6" CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE SEE NOTE 1 VARIES 8' TO 13' SEE PLAN VIEW - TO BE GRASS SODDED (TYP.) END VIEW 3' 3' SWALE STREET INSTALL SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" CURB 2" NEW ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE NOTE 2 LONG ROAD SECTION NOT TO SCALE Revisions Designed S.A.J. Checked TOP VIEW CURB DROP NOT TO SCALE NORMAL GUTTER LINE DEPRESSED GUTTER LINE LIMIT OF DEPRESSION STA. 10+00 LONG RD.= STA. 10+00 MONTGOMERY AVE. SEE SHEET 1. LONG ROAD Date 5/13/94 5/16/94 ENTERLIN TOP' :OF ' IGHT: CUR: CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 5' GRAVEL TRANSITION FOR EXISTING DRIVEWAY. INSTALL 100' TAPER FROM EDGE OF EXISTING ASPHALT TO BEGINNING OF NEW CURB WI 4" WHITE STRIPE ALONG EDGE. (SEE NOTE 7) BEGIN NEW CURB & ROAD SECTION, STA. 11+80 PROVIDE 12 LONG NOSE DOWN & END TAPER. GRADE DRAINAGE TO FLOW TO SWALE. IIMATAIRMINTY INSTALL FOGLINE W/ 200' RADIUS C. STA. 14+27.45 TO RT. OF C STA. 15+27.45 EXTENDED (SEE NOTE 7) PAVE FROM EXTENDED CURB LINE TO EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT, 18' RT. OF STA. 15+27.45 EXTENDED. END NEW CURB STA. 14+80 W/ 12" NOSE DOWN OWNER'S APPROVAL SIGNATURE SCALE FEET CONTOUR INTERVAL =1 FOOT T.B.M. — "X" ON BOLT OF FIRE HYDRANT AT INT. OF MONTGOMERY AVE. & LONG RD. ASSUMED EL.=500.00 CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. THE TOP COURSE FOR ALL SECTIONS SHALL BE 5/8" MINUS CRUSHED SURFACING AND SHALL CONFORM TO ALL W.S.D.O.T. 1994 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. ALL ACP SHALL BE CLASS B" IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. 1994 STANDARD SPECIFICATINS WITH MIX DESIGN APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY. 3. CURB INLET SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C 478 (AASHTO M 199) & ASTM C 890. TOP SURFACE TO BE BROOM FINISHED AND ALL EXTERNAL EDGES NOT LABELED SHALL BE TROWELLED WITH 1/4" RADIUS EDGER. 4. CURBS INSTALLED AT LESS THAN 0.8% GRADE SHALL REQUIRE WRITTEN CERTIFICATION BY AN INDEPENDENT, LICENSED SURVEYOR AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THE CURB FORM PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR, FORMS SHALL BE AT 25' STATIONS. CERTIFICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER. 5. DRYWELL AND GRAVEL ENVELOPE SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH A FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR APPPROVED EQUIVALENT) IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD PLAN B-1. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE ANY UTILITIES, WHERE CONFLICTING, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 4" WIDE FOGLINE, PAINTED WHITE. FOGLINE SHALL BE PAINTED 12" FROM EDGE OF ASPHALT. SCOTTISH ADDITION LONG ROAD STA. 10+00 TO STA. 14+80 SHEET CADD ACCESS NAME: 93164R25 ♦ • 5. '-? 83/- 3 c;,eL=/�/d,'%/''G=5 ' /¢, 250 • 2d1xzo' us,4. fir, -- -- # i' . f3o, // 7 .5� 75046. /.5 PROPOSED LOCATED IN THE ,544/./ OF /Ye SECTIO Z SPOKANE COUNTY. WASHINGTON SPONSOR AVERAGE SIZE 33 684 ' PLAT AREA 6. ,/.9 acs, UTILITIES Af/Q •�ie,c.7:",, crop sd „se:4;17G T•90IM'.5, ccv'ba�a TEGE. DESCRIPTION T~ , 3 J 5' , - / 93 ,9 �� I .� ,'7 r'/o,' Of 7 Q4C 7" 3 .�i .Q 6,eetrA/..9c/2 65 TQ.e/6',9T/OAS/ P/�Sr is /PSG E' Z) /4/ �"`i 4e09.0t/4' Co 7r //5, 88 —_4 w` ui INI 1 i 111 ("/ n /nut Kai Pods WAY AV JUULLeNS p`•ortunity_Veradale c, R111 d UMW 1. Laic 'V/C/N / T y • 444R (M sc4440 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE MUNNnS ]Moab Lakir ir THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS PROPOSED PLAT WAS PREPARED BY ME FR. ., XISTING COUNTY RECORDS AID DOES NOT REPRESENT , qj ; RVEY. WRENCE L CERTIFICATE W Civil Design and Land Plannhag ' W. 106 Mission Ave.. Sults 206 Spakans, Maehlm4toia, 69201 PROM (609) 328-3371 FAX (SOS) w- 1 4 • • • LONG ROAD N.00'00'15"E. FOUND REBAR 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 ci co r FOUND REBAR EAST 630.1 1 ' 30' O O O 0 N.00'00' 15" E. 0 0 0 0 2426 25' BUILDING SETBACK 285.00' 1 28,500 S.F. EAST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2420 285.00' 2 28,500 S.F. EAST 285.00' 0 0 0 0 r 33' 190.00' 10' UTIL. ESMT. 2414 7 ;n + IN 30' ®—T1 - --EAST-- DRAINAGE EASEMENT — 6' DRAINFIELD EASEMENT EAST 95.00' 0 0 1i) 3 19,000 S.F. 0 0 190.00' 95.00' 4 14,250 S.F. DRAINAGE EASEMENT 30' 176.00' 125.00' FOUND REBAR 0 17917 0 0 0 in 0 0 0 to S00 DO'15"W 95.00' 5 23,750 S.F. 17929 20' x 20' USA ESMT. 0 0 S00'00'15" W 115.00' 6 1.188 ACS. 18003 25' BUILDING SETBACK 95.00' 0 0 0 S00roo'15"W 115.00' 7 1.188 ACS. 18015 10' UTIL. ESMT. 0 0 ci S00'00'15"W 115.11' 8 1.193 ACS. 18027 DRAINAGE EASEMENT 0 st Ci 20' 95.00' KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT GREER CONSTRUCTION, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, HAS CAUSED TO BE PLATTED INTO LOTS, BLOCKS, AND STREETS THE LAND SHOWN HEREON TO BE KNOW AS SCOTTISH ADDITION, BEING A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 7, T.25N., R.45E., W.M. IN SPOKANE: COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ,eC9 \c) TRACT B OF SHORT PLAT NO. SP 831-93 AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN M�c� VOLUME 9 OF SHORT PLATS, PAGE 74; k51C SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON. cee- CONDITIONS: SIDE YARD AND REAR YARD SETBACKS SHALL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUESTED UNLESS THESE SETBACKS ARE SPECIFICALLY DRAFTED ON THIS FINAL PLAT. THE SETBACKS INDICATED ON THIS PLAT MAY BE VARIED FROM IF PROPER ZONING APPROVALS ARE OBTAINED. THE PUBUC WATER SYSTEM, PURSUANT TO THE WATER PLAN APPROVED BY COUNTY AND STATE HEALTH AUTHORITIES, THE LOCAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT, AND WATER PURVEYOR, SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, AND THE APPUCANT SHALL PROVIDE FOR INDIVIDUAL DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE AS WELL AS FIRE PROTECTION TO EACH LOT PRIOR TO SALE OF EACH LOT AND PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR EACH LOT. DUPLEXES ARE PROHIBITED. THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST AGREE TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY TO PLACE THEIR NAMES) ON A PL. IIIION FOR THE FORMATION OF UUD BY PEIIIION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW 36.94, WHICH PETITION INCLUDES THE OWNER(S)' PROPERTY; AND FURTHER NOT TO OBJECT BY THE SIGNING OF A PROTEST PETITION AGAINST THE FORMATION OF A ULID BY RESOLUTION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW 36.94 WHICH INCLUDES THE OWNER(S)' PROPERTY, PROVIDED, THIS CONDITION SHALL NOT PROHIBIT THE OWNERS ' OR SUCCESSOR(S) FROM OBJECTING TO ANY ASSESSMENT(S) ON THE PROPERTY AS A RESULT OF IMPROVEMENTS CALLED FOR IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FORMATION OF A UUD BY EITHER PETITION OR RESOLUTION METHOD UNDER RCW CHAPTER 36.94. USE OF PRIVATE WELLS AND WATER SYSTEMS IS PROHIBITED. EACH DWELUNG UNIT SHALL BE DOUBLE -PLUMBED FOR CONNECTION TO FUTURE AREAWIDE COLLECTION SYSTEMS. SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC APPLICATION APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF PERMITS BY THE HEALTH OFFICER, THE USE OF INDMDUAL ON -SITE SEWAGE SYSTEMS MAY BE AUTHORIZED. UTIUTY EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PLAT ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE SERVING UTIUTY COMPANIES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, RECONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF UTIUTIES. TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO INSPECT SAID UTIUTES AND TO TRIM AND/OR REMOVE BRUSH AND TREES THAT MAY INTERFER WITH THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF SAME. NO BUILDINGS SHALL BE ERECTED WITHIN THE 6' DRAINFIELD EASEMENT, AS SHOWN HEREON. ANY DRAINFIELD ON LOT 3 AND 4 SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF TEN(10) FEET FROM THIS EASEMENT AND THE EAST PROPERTY UNE OF LOT A. THE DRAINFIELD EASEMENT SHALL BE VACATED AT SUCH TIME AS LOT A IS CONNECTED TO PUBLIC SEWER OR THE EXISTING DRAINFIELD IS RELOCATED ENTIRELY ON LOT A. THE EXISTING DRAINFIELD SHALL BE RELOCATED ENTIRELY ON LOT A WHEN IT IS DEEMED INEFFECTIVE. 115.00' EAST 535.88' 535.93' EAST 115.00' 115.88' 1 M O O S.00'05'41" E. FOUND REBAR FOUND REBAR MONTGOMERY AVENUE FOUND CONC. MON. 7cKirvc Covry dies v\Icri 6ccep e PeNs���LI�1 of MI11IJ (VJl5 cl co)- i,11/4coin.-s f� ‘0 (� � o c,� AM N C'Z A-CAJ l e easc� ent}3 0 R �" 1.(0 \� I fv fits- NOr_ j lie gesFuss et ,(, FQIz_ cteriorse ,Aikc., eOe2- I I IuCt J s) bob Ike_( fo t o Ncje-s-e CCSOeilA0A (C10 (2_ 4 �� 6\ue i ae_ cIcIecaNsiAvc�"�olu waro n E, Cv P ioc\ �U 6e-ek-N -tU M Fi- ►off � c�Kp-c �vfsa �--s 5 �>�-t >� e f� � o'N � P /t �e PP--T4'j DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, AS PLATTED AND SHOWN HEREON, WHICH ARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF — INSTALLING, OPERATING AND MAINTAINING DRAINAGE PONDS AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES TO DISPOSE OF RUNOFF, ARE HEREBY GRANTED TO SPOKANE COUNTY AND THE PUBLIC. SPOKANE COUNTY AND ITS AUTHORIZED AGENTS ARE HEREBY GRANTED THE RIGHT TO INGRESS AND EGRESS TO, OVER, AND FROM SAID EASEMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSPECTION AND EMERGENCY MAINTENANCE OF 208 SWALES AND OTHER DRAINAGE FACILITIES, IF NOT PROPERLY MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. SPOKANE COUNTY DOES NOT ACCEPT THE RESPONSIBIUTY �' TO INSPECT OR MAINTAIN THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES, NOR DOES THE COUNTY ACCEPT ANY LIABILITY FOR ANY FAILURE BY THE LOT OWNER(S) TO PROPERLY MAINTAIN SUCH AREAS. IF THE PROPERTY OWNER FAILS TO MAINTAIN THE SURFACE PATH OF NATURAL OR MAN-MADE DRAINAGE FLOW, OR THE DRAINAGE SWALE, A NOTICE OF SUCH FAILURE MAY BE GIVEN TO THE /PROPERTY OWNER. IF NOT CORRECTED WITHIN THE PERIOD INDICATED ON SAID NOTICE, SPOKANE COUNTY HAS THE RIGHT TO CORRECT THE MAINTENANCE FAILURE, OR HAVE IT CORRECTED, AT THE EXPENSE OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. THE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THIS PLAT SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING OPEN AND MAINTAINING THE SURFACE PATH OF NATURAL OR MAN-MADE DRAINAGE FLOW OVER AND ACROSS THEIR RESPECTIVE PROPERTIES. THE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THIS PLAT SHALL MAINTAIN ALL WATER QUALITY TREATMENT SWALES ("208 SWALES") AND DRAINAGE DITCHES SITUATED ON THEIR RESPECTIVE PROPERTIES, AND ANY �1'PO'RTION OF A 208 SWALE SITUATED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO THEIR RESPECTIVE '� KOPERTIES, WITH A PERMANENT GROUND COVER AS SPECIFIED ON THE CURRENT APPROVED PLANS ON FILE AT THE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE. THE PROPERTY OWNERS MAY INSTALL APPROVED SHRUBBERY AND/OR TREES WHICH DO NOT OBSTRUCT THE FLOW AND PERCOLATION OF STORM DRAINAGE WATER IN THE 208 SWALE AND DRAINAGE DITCHES AS INDICATED IN THE CURRENT APPROVED PLANS ON FILE WITH THE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE. THE PROPERTY OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL INFORM EACH SUCCEEDING PURCHASER OF .—ALL DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY AND OF HIS RESPONSIBIUTY FOR MAINTAINING SURFACE DRAINAGE PATHS AND SWALES WITHIN SAID EASEMENTS. ANY BUILDING THAT IS CONSTRUCTED ON A LOT IN THIS PLAT SHALL BE SET AT SUCH AN ELEVATION SO AS TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ANY DRAINAGE ENTRY POINT TO THE BUILDING (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO A WINDOW WELL, A WINDOW UNPROTECTED BY A WINDOW WELL, OR A DOORWAY). SAID POSITIVE DRAINAGE SHALL CONSIST OF A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 3% AWAY FROM TIE BUILDING FOR A DISTANCE OF A LEAST 10 FEET FROM THE BUILDING. THE LOTS SHALL BE ...---'GRADED SO THAT EITHER a) ALL RUNOFF IS ROUTED AWAY FROM THE BUILDING, AND CONVEYED OVER THE LOT TO A NATURAL DRAINAGE SWALE OR APPROVED DRAINAGE FACILITY, OR b) DRAINAGE INTERCEPTED ON THE LOT IS DISPOSED OF ON THE LOT IN AN APPROVED DRAINAGE FACILITY. THE APPROVED DRAINAGE FACILITY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS ON FILE AT THE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE. ANY REVISIONS TO THE APPROVED DRAINAGE PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF SAID REVISIONS. FI, AL PLAT OF BEING A PORTION OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST,W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON APRIL 1994 50 25 0 50 100 SCALE SCALE: 1" = 50' LEGEND FEET = SET #5 REBAR W/CAP LEINWEBER 13775 0 LOT CORNERS • = FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED = FOUND #5 REBAR W/CAP LS 13775 BASIS OF BEARING THE CENTERLINE OF MONTGOMERY AVENUE IS ASSUMED "EAST' PER SP-831-93 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE AFORESAID OWNERS HAVE HEREUNTO SET THEIR HANDS UPON THE DATES SHOWN. GREER CONSTRUCTION, INC. PRESIDENT DATE VICE PRESIDENT DATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF ) SS. ON THIS DAY OF _ , 1994, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBUC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DULY COMMISSIONED AND SWORN, PERSONALLY APPEARED TO ME KNOWN TO BE THE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT, OF GREER CONSTRUCTION, INC., THE CORPORATION THAT EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF SAID CORPORATION, FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED, AND TO OATH STATED THAT HE IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE SAID INSTRUMENT. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUDITORS CERTIFICATE FILED AND RECORDED THIS _ , , DAY OF AT M. IN BOOK OF AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF , 19_ . COUNTY AUDITOR DEPUTY COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 19___, DIRECTOR, SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES COUNTY ENGINEER EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 19_ . COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER , 19_• DIRECTOR, SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. DAY OF , 19_ . SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER COUNTY ASSESSOR EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 19__. SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR BY DEPUTY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THIS FINAL PLAT WAS APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ON THIS DAY OF , 19 COUNTY TREASURER I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL TAXES AGAINST THE LAND SHOWN WITHIN THIS , 19 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. P 13715 4I STEO" SAL LA ) EXPIRES 10-03-95 CHAIRMAN, SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WHICH HAVE BEEN LEVIED AND BECOME CHARGEABLE MAP HAVE BEEN FULLY PAID THIS DAY OF SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER BY DEPUTY SE it 1894 ACCURACY STATEMENT (WAC 332-130-100) THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED USING A UETZ SET-4 TOTAL STATION, A ZEISS LEVEL, AND A 100 FOOT CHAIN. HORIZONTAL DISTANCES ARE BASED ON THE NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY CALIBRATION AT FELTS FIELD. FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS USED WERE AS PER WAC 332-130-090 PART C. ® Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning (509) 328-3371 FINAL PLAT OF SCOTTISH ADDITION SEP 1994 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER CADD ACCESS NAME: 93164P15 r.� 0 4„ V Z 0 N.00'00'15"E. FOUND REBAR 0 0 0 oo 30' 30' 0 O O 0 0 Z 0 0 0 FOUND REBAR 25' BUILDING SETBACK 285.00' 1 28,500 S.F. EAST PLAT „A" GRER iIlfroEfi` IRRIGATION DISTRICT TRACT 3 EAST 630.11' 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 285.00' 2 28,500 S.F. EAST 285.00' 0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 190.00' 10' UTIL. ESMT. 4eAt. 19,000 S.F. N cR — 6' DRAINFIELD � icJ . EASEMENT et,/ vC,�ct' EAST- 190.00' J EAST fi 95.00' r N.00hbOO 15" E 95.00' 4 14,250 S.F. 0 O 0 try T 95.00' 0 0 5 sn 23,750 S.F. 0 0 0 O V) 20' x 20' USA ESMT. 0 O 0 LO N S00'00'15"W 115.00' 6 1.188 ACS. /•11 BUILDING y SETBACK 0 0 ,O^^ 4J SO0'00'1 5"W 115.00' 7 1.188 ACS. —10' UTIL. ESMT. 0 0 01^ 4J S00'00'15"W 115.11' 8 1.193 ACS. /.'? 176.00' of 125.00' FOUND REBAR 95.00' 95.00' 115.00' EAST 535.88' _ 535.93' ... EAST 8 SP-89 —93 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT GREER CONSTRUCTION, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, HAS CAUSED TO BE PLATTED INTO LOTS, BLOCKS, AND STREETS THE LAND SHOWN HEREON TO BE KNOW AS SCOTTISH ADDITION, BEING A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 7, T.25N., R.45E., W.M. IN SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: TRACT B OF SHORT PLAT NO. SP 831-93 AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF SHORT PLATS, PAGE 74; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON. CONDITIONS: NO . MORE THAN ONE (1) DWELLING STRUCTURE SHALL BE PLACED ON ANY LOT, NOR SHALL ANY LOT BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING ADDITIONAL LOTS, OWNERSHIPS OR BUILDING SITES WITHOUT FIRST FILING AND RECEIVING APPROVAL OF A REPEAT. o- SIDE YARD AND REAR YARD SETBACKS SHALL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUESTED UNLESS THESE SETBACKS ARE SPECIFICALLY DRAFTED ON THIS FINAL PLAT. THE SETBACKS INDICATED ON THIS PLAT MAY/ BE VARIED FROM IF PROPER ZONING APPROVALS ARE OBTAINED. THE PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM, PURSUANT TO THE WATER PLAN APPROVED BY COUNTY AND STATE HEALTH AUTHORITIES, THE LOCAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT, AND WATER PURVEYOR, SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, AND THE APPLICANT SHALL/ PROVIDE FOR INDIVIDUAL DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE AS WELL AS FIRE PROTECTION TO EACH LOT PRIOR TO SALE OF EACH LOT AND PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR EACH LOT. • DUPLEXES" ARE PROHIBJ?ED y' THE OWNERS) OR SUCCESSORS) IN INTEREST AGREE TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY TO PLACE THEIR NAME(S) ON A PETITION FOR THE FORMATION OF ULID BY PETITION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW 36.94, WHICH PETITION INCLUDES THE OWNER(S)' PROPERTY; AND FURTHER NOT TO OBJECT BY THE SIGNING OF A PROTEST PETITION AGAINST THE FORMATION OF A ULID BY RESOLUTION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW 36.94 WHICH INCLUDES THE OWNER(S)' PROPERTY, PROVIDED, THIS CONDITION SHALL NOT PROHIBIT THE OWNER(S)' OR SUCCESSOR(S) FROM OBJECTING TO ANY ASSESSMENT(S) ON THE PROPERTY AS A RESULT OF IMPROVEMENTS CALLED FOR IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FORMATION OF A ULID BY EITHER PETITION OR RESOLUTION METHOD UNDER RCW CHAPTER 36.94. tSET;.OF PRIVATE WELLS AND WATER SYSTEMS IS PROHIBITED. EACH DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE DOUBLE -PLUMBED FOR CONNECTION TO FLJ URE AREAWIDE COLLECTION SYSTEMS. SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC APPLICATION APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF PERMITS BY;k,THE HEALTH OFFICER, THE USE OF INDIVIDUAL ON -SITE SEWAGE SYSTEMS MAY, BE AUTHORIZED. 115.00' 115.88' 0 0 MI MONTGOMERY AVENUE O S.40'05'41" E. FOUND REBAR 1 'f.- • FOUND REBAR FOUND CONC. MON. r 4 SP-77-i —92 THE OWNERS OF ALL LOTS SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING OPEN AND MAINTAINING THE PATH OF THE NATURAL OR MAN-MADE DRAINAGE FLOW OVER AND ACROSS THE PROPERTY. THE LOWEST BUILDING OPENING, INCLUDING BASEMENT OPENING FOR ANY BUILDING ON ALL LOTS, SHALL BE HIGH ENOUGH TO ALLOW A MINIMUM 3% AWAY FROM THE BUILDING IN 10 FEET. ALL DRAINAGE SHALL BE ROUTED AWAY FROM THE BUILDING TO NATURAL DRAINAGES OR OTHER LAWFUL DRAINAGE FEATURES. UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PLAT ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE SERVING UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE CONS I RUCTION, RECONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF UTILITIES. TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO INSPECT SAID UTIL[TES AND TO TRIM AND/OR REMOVE BRUSH AND TREES THAT MAY INTERFER WITH THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF SAME. NO BUILDINGS SHALL BE ERECTED WITHIN THE 6' DRAINFIELD EASEMENT, AS SHOWN HEREON. ANY DRAINFIELD ON LOT 3 AND 4 SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF TEN(10) FEET FROM THIS EASEMENT AND THE EAST PROPERTY LINE OF LOT A. THE DRAINFIELD EASEMENT SHALL BE VACATED AT SUCH TIME AS LOT A IS CONNECTED TO PUBLIC SEWER OR THE EXISTING DRAINFIELD IS RELOCATED ENTIRELY ON LOT A. THE EXISTING DRAINFIELD SHALL BE RELOCATED ENTIRELY ON LOT A WHEN IT IS DEEMED INEFFECTIVE. G�� PINS L PLAT OF BEING A PORTION OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST,W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON APRIL 1994 50 25. 50 100 SCALE SCALE: 1" = 50' FEET LEGEND I = SET #5 REBAR W/CAP LEINWEBER 13775 @ LOT CORNERS = FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED A = FOUND #5 REBAR W/CAP LS 13775 BASIS OF BEARING THE CENTERLINE OF MONTGOMERY AVENUE IS ASSUMED "EAS1" PER SP-831-93 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE AFORESAID OWNERS HAVE HEREUNTO SET THEIR HANDS UPON THE DATES SHOWN. GREER CONSTRUCTION, INC. PRESIDENT DATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF ) )SS. VICE PRESIDENT DATE ON THIS DAY OF , 1994, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DULY COMMISSIONED AND SWORN, PERSONALLY APPEARED TO ME KNOWN TO BE THE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT, OF GREER CONS I RUCTION, INC., THE CORPORATION THAT EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF SAID CORPORATION, FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED, AND TO OATH STATED THAT HE IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE SAID INSTRUMENT. . WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUDITORS CERTIFICATE FILED AND RECORDED THIS DAY OF , 19 AT M IN BOOK OF AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF COUNTY AUDITOR DEPUTY COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF COUNTY ENGINEER APPRROVED HIS _DAY OF COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF COUNTY ASSESSOR EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF . 19 DIRECTOR, SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 19 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 9 - DIRECTOR, SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. , 19 . SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER 19 SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR BY DEPUTY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THIS FINAL PLAT WAS APPROVED AND ACCENTED BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ON THIS DAY OF 19___ COUNTY TREASURER I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL TAXES AGAINST THE LAND SHOWN WITHIN THIS 19 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. L.L Q of 7414, mot^ z vo 0 13775 (s) islOkv i AL LAB EXPIRES 10-03-95 CHAIRMAN, SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WHICH HAVE BEEN LEVIED AND BECOME CHARGEABLE MAP HAVE BEEN FULLY PAID THIS DAY OF SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER BY DEPUTY PRELIM9NARY APR 18 1 RECEIVED APR 1 „b 7994 s CqUhrn' ENGINEF,g ACCURACY STATEMENT (WAC 332-130-100) THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED USING A LIETZ SET-4 TOTAL STATION, A ZEISS LEVEL, AND A 100 FOOT CHAIN. HORIZONTAL DISTANCES ARE BASED ON THE NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY CALIBRATION AT FELTS FIELD. FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS USED WERE AS PER WAC 332-130-090 PART C. 6I Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning • (509) 328-3371 ij FINAL PLAT OF SCOTTISH ADDITION CADD ACCESS NAME: 93164P15 d•6 CLID CI ea 905 09.4• county HQ. N - CON', ON S Z 7— 25-45 326160 RIVER R4 N z Sec. 77:45 0 € 31 i r C, 64e' EUCLID �►'B.3 28 sy si990, pr•,.ATEd TAR sWW1/ .50,0 • JUNE /7 /927 R/W I9: y�1 R22', J' Ild' ,/' MONrGOMERY fir VE• -as 45 5'sy9 os can!T. RIVER ,ROSE MOBILE HOME PARK 07551-6001 thru M07551-6113 6\ tO LONG ROAD N.00'00'15"E. FOUND REBAR 0 0 0 O FOUND REBAR EAST 630.11' 30' O O O O e) N.00°00' 15" E. O O 0 O 2426 25' BUILDING SETBACK 285.00' 1 28,500 S.F. EAST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2420 285.00' 2 28,500 S.F. EAST 285.00' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lf) 0 O 0 O 33' 190.00' 10' UTIL. ESMT. 2414 DRAINAGE EASEMENT 110 I IN _ 30' �+ 1 0 0 0 OD — 6' DRAINFIELD EASEMENT 3 19,000 S.F. --- EAST- A\ 190.00' EAST 1 95.00' 0 O 0 O O O z 95.00' 4 14,250 S.F. DRAINAGE EASEMENT 30' 125.00' 17917 I ' 176.00' - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 N S00'00'15"W 0 0 0 95.00' 5 23,750 S.F. 17929 20' x 20' USA ESMT. 0 0 ci N to 0 0 0 0 co 115.00' 6 1.188 ACS. 18003 25' BUILDING SETBACK 0 0 0 S00'00'15"W 115.00' 7 1.188 ACS. 18015 10' UTIL. ESMT. 0 0 0 S00'00'15"W 115.11' 8 1.193 ACS. 18027 DRAINAGE - EASEMENT. FOUND REBAR 0 95.00' KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT GREER CONSTRUCTION, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, HAS CAUSED TO BE PLATTED INTO LOTS, BLOCKS, AND STREETS THE LAND SHOWN HEREON TO BE KNOW AS SCOTTISH ADDITION, BEING A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 7, T.25N., R.45E., W.M. IN SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: TRACT B OF SHORT PLAT NO. SP 831-93 AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 9 OF SHORT PLATS, PAGE 74; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON. CONDITIONS: SIDE YARD AND REAR YARD SETBACKS SHALL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUESTED UNLESS THESE SETBACKS ARE SPECIFICALLY DRAFTED ON THIS FINAL PLAT. THE SETBACKS INDICATED ON THIS PLAT MAY BE VARIED FROM IF PROPER ZONING APPROVALS ARE OBTAINED. THE PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM, PURSUANT TO THE WATER PLAN APPROVED BY COUNTY AND STATE HEALTH AUTHORITIES, THE LOCAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT, AND WATER PURVEYOR, SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, AND THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE FOR INDIVIDUAL DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE AS WELL AS FIRE PROTECTION TO EACH LOT PRIOR TO SALE OF EACH LOT AND PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR EACH LOT. DUPLEXES ARE PROHIBETED. THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) IN INTEREST AGREE TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY TO PLACE THEIR NAME(S) ON A PE i I I ION FOR THE FORMATION OF ULID BY PETITION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW 36.94, WHICH PETITION INCLUDES THE OWNER(S)' PROPERTY; AND FURTHER NOT TO OBJECT BY THE SIGNING OF A PROTEST PETITION AGAINST THE FORMATION OF A ULID BY RESOLUTION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW 36.94 WHICH INCLUDES THE OWNER(S)' PROPERTY, PROVIDED, THIS CONDON SHALL NOT PROHIBIT THE OWNER(S)'(ITI ) OR SUCCESSOR(S) FROM OBJECTING TO ANY ASSESSMENT(S) ON THE PROPERTY AS A RESULT OF IMPROVEMENTS CALLED FOR IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FORMATION OF A ULID BY EITHER PETITION OR RESOLUTION METHOD UNDER RCW CHAPTER 36.94. USE OF PRIVATE WELLS AND WATER SYSTEMS IS PROHIBITED. EACH DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE DOUBLE -PLUMBED FOR CONNECTION TO FUTURE AREAWIDE COLLECTION SYSTEMS. SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC APPLICATION APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF PERMITS BY THE HEALTH OFFICER, THE USE OF INDIVIDUAL ON -SITE SEWAGE SYSTEMS MAY BE AUTHORIZED. UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PLAT ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE SERVING UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, RECONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF UTILITIES. TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO INSPECT SAID UTILITES AND TO TRIM AND/OR REMOVE BRUSH AND TREES THAT MAY INTERFER WITH THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF SAME. NO BUILDINGS SHALL BE ERECTED WITHIN THE 6' DRAINFIELD EASEMENT, AS SHOWN HEREON. ANY DRAINFIELD ON LOT 3 AND 4 SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF TEN(10) FEET FROM THIS EASEMENT AND THE EAST PROPERTY LINE OF LOT A. THE DRAINFIELD EASEMENT SHALL BE VACATED AT SUCH TIME AS LOT A IS CONNECTED TO PUBLIC SEWER OR THE EXISTING DRAINFIELD IS RELOCATED ENTIRELY ON LOT A. THE EXISTING DRAINFIELD SHALL BE RELOCATED ENTIRELY ON LOT A WHEN IT IS DEEMED INEFFECTIVE. i 115.00' EAST 535.88' EAST 535.93' 115.00' 115.88' O O O 0 0 0 U) S.00°05'41" E. 20" 0 FOUND REBAR FOUND REBAR MONTGOMERY AVENUE SPOKANE COUNTY DOES NOT ACCEPT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF MAINTAINING THE DRAINAGE COURSE ON PRIVATE LOTS WITHIN DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OR FLOODPLAIN AREAS, NOR THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGE, WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, INVERSE CONDEMNATION TO ANY PROPERTIES DUE TO DEFICIENT CONSTRUCTION AND/OR MAINTENANCE OF DRAINAGE COURSES IN DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, AS PLAITED AND SHOWN HEREON, WHICH ARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING, OPERATING AND MAINTAINING DRAINAGE PONDS AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES TO DISPOSE OF RUNOFF, ARE HEREBY GRANTED TO SPOKANE COUNTY AND THE PUBLIC. SPOKANE COUNTY AND ITS AUTHORIZED AGENTS ARE HEREBY GRANTED THE RIGHT TO INGRESS AND EGRESS TO, OVER, AND FROM SAID EASEMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSPECTION AND EMERGENCY MAINTENANCE OF 208 SWALES AND OTHER DRAINAGE FACILITIES, IF NOT PROPERLY MAINTAINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. SPOKANE COUNTY DOES NOT ACCEPT THE RESPONSIBILITY TO INSPECT OR MAINTAIN THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES, NOR DOES THE COUNTY ACCEPT ANY LIABILITY FOR ANY FAILURE BY THE LOT OWNER(S) TO PROPERLY MAINTAIN SUCH AREAS. IF THE PROPERTY OWNER FAILS TO MAINTAIN THE SURFACE PATH OF NATURAL OR MAN-MADE DRAINAGE FLOW, OR THE DRAINAGE SWALE, A NOTICE OF SUCH FAILURE MAY BE GIVEN TO THE PROPERTY OWNER. IF NOT CORRECTED WITHIN THE PERIOD INDICATED ON SAID NOTICE, SPOKANE COUNTY HAS THE RIGHT TO CORRECT THE MAINTENANCE FAILURE, OR HAVE IT CORRECTED, AT THE EXPENSE OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. THE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THIS PLAT SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING OPEN AND MAINTAINING THE SURFACE PATH OF NATURAL OR MAN-MADE DRAINAGE FLOW OVER AND ACROSS THEIR RESPECTIVE PROPERTIES. THE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THIS PLAT SHALL MAINTAIN ALL WATER QUALITY TREATMENT SWALES ("208 SWALES") AND DRAINAGE DITCHES SITUATED ON THEIR RESPECTIVE PROPERTIES, AND ANY PORTION OF A 208 SWALE SITUATED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO THEIR RESPECTIVE PROPERTIES, WITH A PERMANENT GROUND COVER AS SPECIFIED ON THE CURRENT APPROVED PLANS ON FILE AT THE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE. THE PROPERTY OWNERS MAY INSTALL APPROVED SHRUBBERY AND/OR TREES WHICH DO NOT OBSTRUCT THE FLOW AND PERCOLATION OF STORM: . DRAINAGE WATER IN THE 208 SWALE AND DRAINAGE DITCHES AS INDICATED IN THE CURRENT APPROVED PLANS ON FILE WITH THE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE. THE PROPERTY OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL INFORM EACH SUCCEEDING PURCHASER OF ALL DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY AND OF HIS RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTAINING SURFACE DRAINAGE PATHS AND SWALES WITHIN SAID EASEMENTS. ANY BUILDING THAT IS CONSTRUCTED ON A LOT IN THIS PLAT SHALL BE SET AT SUCH AN ELEVATION SO AS TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ANY DRAINAGE ENTRY POINT TO THE BUILDING (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO A WINDOW WELL, A WINDOW UNPROTECTED BY A WINDOW WELL, OR A DOORWAY). SAID POSITIVE DRAINAGE SHALL CONSIST OF A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 3% AWAY FROM THE BUILDING FOR A DISTANCE OF A LEAST 10 FEET FROM THE BUILDING. THE LOTS SHALL BE GRADED SO THAT EITHER a) ALL RUNOFF IS ROUTED AWAY FROM THE BUILDING, AND CONVEYED OVER THE LOT TO A NATURAL DRAINAGE SWALE OR APPROVED DRAINAGE FACILITY, OR b) DRAINAGE INTERCEPTED ON •THE LOT IS DISPOSED OF ON THE LOT IN AN APPROVED DRAINAGE FACILITY. THE APPROVED DRAINAGE FACILITY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS ON FILE AT THE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE. ANY REVISIONS TO THE APPROVED DRAINAGE PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF SAID REVISIONS. FOUND CONC. MON. BEING A PORTION OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST,W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 50 25 0 50 100 11101111111111 SCALE FEET SCALE: 1" = 50' LEGEND = SET #5 REBAR W/CAP LEINWEBER 13775 ® LOT CORNERS = FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED = FOUND #5 REBAR W/CAP LS 13775 BASIS OF BEARING THE CENTERLINE OF MONTGOMERY AVENUE IS ASSUMED "EAST" PER SP-831-93 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE AFORESAID OWNERS HAVE HEREUNTO SET THEIR HANDS UPON THE DATES SHOWN. GREER CONSTRUCTION, INC. PRESIDENT DATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF ) ON THIS DAY OF ° , 1994, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE TATE OF WASHINGTON DULY COMMISSIONED AND SWORN, PERSONALLY APPEARED TO ME KNOWN TO BE THE PRESIDENT Ai 'VICE =PRESB3E-Nf, OF GREER CONSTRUCTION, INC., THE CORPORATION THAT EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF SAID CORPORATION, FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED, AND TO OATH STATED THAT HE IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE SAID INSTRUMENT. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRI I I EN. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE' STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT MY COMMISSION EXPIRES i k - 3 AUDITORS CERTIFICATL FILED AND RECORDED THIS DAY OF , 19 AT M. IN BOOK OF AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF COUNTY AUDITOR DEPUTY COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF COUNTY ENGINEER EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 199'A DIRECTOR, SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 19 "'/'"/ COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 19 COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS COUNTY ASSESSOR EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF DIRECTOR, SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. DAY OF , 19 SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER , 19 SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR BY DEPUTY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THIS FINAL PLAT WAS APPROVED AND ACCEP ED BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ON THIS DAY OF , 19 COUNTY TREASURER CHAIRMAN, SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL TAXES WHICH HAVE BEEN LEVIED AND BECOME CHARGEABLE AGAINST THE LAND SHOWN WITHIN THIS MAP HAVE BEEN FULLY PAID THIS DAY OF , 19 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. �QV4LLAB EXPIRES 10-03-95 SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER BY DEPUTY ACCURACY STATEMENT (WAC 332-130-100) THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED USING A LIETZ SET-4 TOTAL STATION, A ZEISS LEVEL, AND A 100 FOOT CHAIN. HORIZONTAL DISTANCES ARE BASED ON THE NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY CALIBRATION AT FELTS FIELD. FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS USED WERE AS PER WAC 332-130-090 PART C. ffr Taylor Engineering, Inc. Civil Design and Land Planning (509) 328-3371 LLL. !1LOF SCALE: 1" =50' 1 1