ZE-101C-70 (2)r
ij
I
SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR
PUBLIC HEARING
AGENDA: JUNE 25, 1984, Monday TELEPHONE NO. 456 -2205
TIME: 1:15 P.M.
PLACE: Spokane County Planning Department
N. 721 Jefferson St., Broadway Centre Bldg., 2nd floor
Conference Room, Spokane, WA 99260
APPLICATIONS WILL BE HEARD IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR THESE PROJECTS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT FILES.
A. CHANGE OF CONDITIONS
1. ZE- 101C -70 CHANGE OF CONDITIONS
Generally located east of Barker
south -6f Boone, and north of I -90
in Section 17- 25 -45.
PROPOSAL The applicant is request-
ing a change of conditions
for Freeway Commercial
zoned property. The
Zoning Adjustor under
Section 4.25.030(j)and
4.08A.050(c) has the
authority to hear an amend-
ment to approved Freeway
Commercial Development and
Traffic Control Plan. The
present zoning allows for
a service station. The
applicant now desires to
amend the site plan to
include a restaurant (1 story).
Site Size 39;400 Square Feet (approx.)
Applicant Eugene Werner
B
RECEIVED
ZONING ADJUSTOR SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF ZE- 101C -70; WERNER ' ) FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION
REVIEW OF FREEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONE SITE ) AND CONDITIONS
PLAN AMENDMENT )
THIS MATTER, Being the consideration by the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane
County, in hearing the application (ZE- IO1C -70), for the purpose of reviewing
a proposed addition to a Freeway Commercial site plan, hereinafter referred to
as the "Proposal ", and the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County having held a
public hearing on June 25, 1984 and having fully considered all testimony pre-
sented thereat, and further having visited the site and vicinity in question,
and having rendered a decision on the 5th day of July, 1984, APPROVING said
proposal, does hereby make the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. That the proposal is generally located east of Barker Road, south of
Boone and north of I -90 in Section 17- 25 -45,
2. That the proposal consists of amending an existing site plan to add a
restaurant onto an existing service station facility,
3. That the adopted Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Land Use Plan
indicates Industrial usage of the area encompassed by the proposal.
4. That the site is zoned Freeway Commercial,
5. That the existing land uses in the area of proposal include commercial and
industrial and I -90.
6. That the proposal is consistent with the Freeway Commercial zone and has
been favorably reviewed by the Spokane County Zoning section.
7. That the proposed site plan indicates that setbacks, parking, height of
the structure(s) will conform to the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.
S. That no one appeared to oppose the proposal nor were any written comments
adverse to the proposal received.
9. That the project was found exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act
under WAC 97.10,160 (c) (minor new construction).
10. That the applicant expressed opposition to the imposing of conditions
recommended by the Spokane County Utilities Department and the Spokane County
Engineers Department.
11. It was explained to the applicant that the recommendations submitted from
the County Engineers were consistent with adjoining commercial development
(ZE- 11 -83). The applicant retains the ability to seek a design deviation from the
Spokane County Engineers if he is able to establish to their satisfaction that
certain recommendations for improvement are not necessary.
12. The recommendations of the Spokane County Utilities Department are standard
conditions which are imposed for new development occuring within the Spokane County
Priority Sewer Service Area. These conditions are found by the Zoning Adjustor to
advance the public health, safety and welfare and pursuant to county land use policy,
these conditions are included as requirements in conjunction with the approval of
the applicants request.
13. The applicant was otherwise made aware of conditions from the County Build-
ing and Safety Department and the Spokane County Valley Fire Department,
14. The applicants proposal may need review and approval from the Spokane
County Health District prior to release of building permits.
15. That the proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing before
the Zoning Adjustor of.Spokane County have been met.
...Continued
v
FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION AND CONDITIONS ZE- 101C -70 PAGE 2
CONCLUSION
Following review of the Planning Department file, consideration of the public
testimony, and circumstances in the area of proposal, the Zoning Adjustor concludes
that the proposal is not detrimental and is compatible with the Freeway Commercial
zone and with the original zoning granted for this property.
DECISI
From the foregoing Findings, a review of
ZE- 101C -70, testimony at the public hearing,
hereby in APPROVING the proposal establishes
A. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
the Planning Department File No.
and a site visit, the Zoning Adjustor
the following conditions:
1) The applicant shall develop the site consistent with the plot plan on file
with this application.
2) Futher, the applicant shall indicate sufficient space on the site plan to
accommodate on -site parking for the restaurant and service station facilities.
3) All buildings and structures require building permits as per Section 301 of
the Uniform Building Code.
4) The required fire flow for this complex is 3000 GPM. This complex requires
2 fire hydrants to be installed.
5) The hydrants shall.be installed as per approved water plan and shall be
installed prior to construction.
6) One hydrant shall be installed at the northeast corner of Barker and
Cataldo, the other hydrant shall be installed at the southwest corner of
the property.
7) Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the
use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authori-
zation is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the
Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to
specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health
District.
8) The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to
place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition
method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s)
property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition
against the formation of a UILD by resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.94
which includes the Owner(s) propert PROVIDED, this condition shall not
prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s� from objection to any assessment(s)
on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with
the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution under RCW Chapter
36.94.
9) Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained
from the Spokane County Engineer.
10) Applicant shall improve Cataldo Avenue in a manner consistent with Spokane
County TYPICAL roadway Section No. 1, minimum paving width Access Std.
11) Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road,
drainage and access plans prior to the issuance of a building permit on
the property.
12) A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved
by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit
on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls
shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving
or surfacing as approved by the Spokane County Engineer, will be required
for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by
vehicles.
13) The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his
heirs, assigns and successors.
... continued
J
FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION AND CONDITIONS ZE- 101C -70 PAGE 3
A. C ONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (CONTINUED)
14) The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplish-
ed as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
15) Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements
are found in Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolution No.
80 -1592 as amended.
Z
DATED THIS 5 " DAY OF 1984.
n
Vrll - IJ, LVI \11 \U r,
SPOK C ANE NTY, WASHINGTON
NOTE: ANY PARTY AGGRIEVED BY THIS DECISION MUST FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN 10 DAYS OF
THIS DATE.
s
►i
I -- -
?H / s
Irb
Date:
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
178 7D 86 HEARD V zod 1 4)G ADTUsTmit 45 M
S-1 A44A) //J ^fdFCWAy 6&&4e 4,L 204F' 4.68A -0402 )
dl, 25. oaolj)
Application. No.: . Z6'• /d!C
ICATION F CHANGE OF CONDITIONS ON PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ZONING
Name of Applicant: 15 Uc�Cu C A)Eks) F-
Street Address of Applicant: /3 a3 C �t{y RtDo
City: G �J: &N! }c P.rs State: e.t).4 Zip Code: >>c!L Tele.No.
Existing Zone Classification: o /P? c ls�G
Date Existing Zone Classification Established:
Legal Description of Property: 649CEL W -Z7 0a2oq .SEE A 7r/QG
-
4 foR B i 4 o G E Acs E s
or L6 da >°T 6E /A16- s[Y �4A! D9e
OF Cm Ilez -i>'71 l F<Y LILG SD scY 4'y .?8'/.49 70 T2uE
t - f;4 NM-L _9MIN Rac ?N 59LCt�aG d /H,n/ 4-Wd'
7!/ SS3 DE4 39H 1AI
V O T/ S41LV OF SO DITCH ?N NwLY ALG- SD [y GA/ 'eyo 7o POB
Section: �_ Township: 17 4— Range: 4l5
Source of Legal: �SSESSo2'S o6F.cE
Assessor's Parcel No.: (See Tax Statement)
PROPOSED CHANGE OF CONDITIONS
Reference specific "Condition(s)" of original approval. (Cite the ,applicable
condition from the Findings and Order of the HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE's
public hearing.)
- 7 PLknl li PPR0gFO FOR. 5e,ZUicf < 7 - 6 !O�J 6A1Ly
Give detailed explanation of request for change in the status of the proposal,
7 /2f6g,Ur 20,JiuG !S F 5FWV1eC- 57 A7 L^ X 7a AP b 7
1 EX /S - rldc— — 5Fevicr TwT - ,on) A /IE<779 ,. , RAg A/T - 5flA ?E
� /aX l- - 1 /57z+2y i •bra Ate ru EXTFR402 C0/r�4 -
IF DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE WILL BE CHANGED SUBSTANTIALLY BY THIS
REQUEST, OR THE PROPERTY HAS BOUNDARIES DIFFERENT THAN ORIGINALLY
PROPOSED, A REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGED
Address, if different than Applicant)
ra. .
3a
Rv� .
fit...
OFFICE OF COUN'T'Y ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
1.
To. Spokane Cuunty Planning Department
FROM: County Engineer'a Department _��J'. :�:, r, •_r.E_.`,
SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval -'Lune Change -- Number:
Appl leant' a Name_ yy`E� tN �_
Section J 7 Townahip_2�N, gangs y'S 9W
The folluwing "conditions of approval for the above - referenced zone change are submitted to
LO .•V �'�
the Spokane Cuunty - hearing •Eaaminur eommietee for inclusion in the a444-f analj'al-s-+aA
"flndinga slid order" of the hearing scheduled J xF a S , 19 64.
Prior To Tha.lssaanee Of A bulldiag permit
1. Applicant shall dedicate feet on _ __
for right- of-way prior to say _ use of the _ property.
2. Applicant shall dedicate _feet on ___ _
for right -of -way and elope easements as necessary prior to any use of the property.
3. Applicant shall-dedicate a_ foot radius on_ _
and prior to say use of the property.
6. Applicant shall dedicate_ - __feet on _ _ and a foot radius on _
and for right-of -way prior to say use of the property. -
C J Access permits for approdchas to the County goad System shall be obtained from the
Spokane County Engineer.
6. Access permits and lmproveaents to _
by the Washington Department of Transportation.
7. Access permits and improvements
by the City
(a) Applicant shall imp ruve( \:c,\An___,\? ___ -.- in a manner consistent with Spokane
0 County TYPICAL roadway section No. / _,minimum paving width 4 :� F,-
(b) Applicant shall improve -- In a manner consistent with Spokane
County TYPICAL roadway section No miulmum paving width
(c) Applicant shall improve _ - _ In a manner consistent with Spokane
County TYPICAL roadway section No. ___ minimum paving width
(d) Applicant bhall Impruve III a manner consistent with Spokane
County TYPICAL roadway Section No. minimum paving width
be approved
must be approved
{Y�1 Applicant 11111 submit
Illr approval by
tile Spokane Cuunty
t:nglurrr fund, drnlnsgr, and
aCeebb plaits prior to
the Ibbnd1ce ut d
bultding permit on
the ploprrty.
10. 'I'he appll,:ant 11:111 1•I1-mlt
t•)r approval
by the Sp,,k.,oe Cuunty
Guglrl dud
the Spukalle
bounty heal t ill bt r I ct
I I,.( it led 1:ulllbi
l4"d 11 i to [:ewdge
nytl( em I)IJI, tllld
tlUtftl�e Vate[
on the
dlapuadl J'1.,; 11,1 Ilu
,ill tit pt „�r•'t nl
:., ,I tho 11:;u,ln.:e
ut any bulldi,lg
prrmft
propctty.
be approved
must be approved
{
A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shdll be submitted and approved by the
Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The,,,
design, location, and arrangement of parking Stalls shall be In accordance with standard
traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer,,,
will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by
vehicles.
his he ire,
l. The word I� "applicant"
shall include the owner or owners of Lite property. J
assigns, and successors. ,
13. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval O/
the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition or resolutiop''
which purpose to the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement.
pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the coot of `.
these improvements.
14. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvement stated herein, the appll
cant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements
stated herein by joining and participating in a County goad Project (CRP) to the extent
of the required road.improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the test of
these improvements.
l5 The construction of the road improvements stated herein s h a ll be accomplished as ap-
proved by the Spokane County Engineer.
16. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard '
Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicabls,county standards z
and or adopted revolutions pertaining to load Standards and Stormwater Nsopgament in
effect at the data of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County MWInae.r.
17. Applicant shall file a petition for the vacation of-- p rior to
any use of the property. s
18. Applicant shall-'construct a paved and delineated access approach(s) to •sit tbs,esistio
pavement on
19. Access to __goad shall be prohibited until such time as speeificaL
authorizedF by the Spokane County Engineer.
20 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are foun4,.iN
Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended.
2o4t(w4 lYw4rOVew�eW'k"`� tPub�H i�QilH bE6N SP2Gi•�ip� ;;;
i,,) h o ;ncrv�5 ��' App<-tivo 1 arz_tF
C�ti�sisEc�nt i.��1 thogc_ 2ee��(r�_�.c� �ocz. Z_E // -83
Ac`r' cv_���rz_41 to �` o`rn+� P_ QGict� • �E //— f? 3 / 5 �cp 7 • �C�
°1 J CA�4Lc�o d�2erl QccRo��S I1�e �L fren4 .
Z- panup
. ..'. ���i.�`F ,: r• nom- ..
':' :: ?: •':?'::• .:�'.. :':ii.• +mot:: ,: 'fiw" +` r.:,�i,. i ;�.(Yl!'i " gRe:
'.� .. '.I -vai': L- � ' c.;:. •ix . .: •s C f r-. M-,:
�`>tiP n:S' ">'v .>. •- s ^rr.'i ni .d.t tyR n7'S^
., . e +. ,:ti•; . ^; j ..,. i �.'r._: x °:. .rRi' - ' - ?`!� ;sir.: C.�",,tp . t a�.?'�,ri� �, ** -:
Sched
.. - .ice „ ;:{ � ,'�i: > .. + ;_
Parcel „An
Mat portion of the Greenacres Irrigation Ditch and Lots 5 6,
I / Block 2, Corbin Addition to Greenacres, according to plat recorded
in Volume "S" of Plats, Page 30, in Spokane County, Washington, more
particularly described as follows:
`Beginning at the Northwc5t corner of said Lot 6; thence South 0 0 1790"
East along the Westerly boundary of said Block 2, a distance of 58.17'
P eet to a point on the Southwesterly line of said Greenacres Irrigation
ditch; thence along said Southwesterly line South 85 0 03' East 50.4
feet to the point of curve of a 32.07 foot radius curve right. whose
central angle is 48 ° 21'; thence along the arc of said curve right a
\.distance of 27.06 feet to the point of tangent; thence South 36 1 42'
!East, 164.40 feet; thence South 36 East 42.79 .feet; thence North
T 53 °39' Fast 126.38 Feet; thence North 0°17'30" blest 200.0 feet to a
int on the Southerly right of way line of the Spokane, Coeur d'Alene
J and Palouse Railroad; thence Southwesterly along said Southerly right
F of way a distance of 300.0 feet to the point of beginning.
a rcel " B"
Th ortion of Lot: 5, Block 2, Corbin Addition to Greena s, accordant *.
Lo plat rded in Volume "S" of Plats, Page 30, in - ,cane County,
Washington, d i.bed as follows:
.Beginning at the Nort0val corner of Lot lock 2, Corbin Addition to
V , Greenacres; thence South 0 30" F along the Westerly boundary of
hD aid Block 2, a distance of 58. eet to a point on the Southwesterly
�fl� ine of Greenacres Irrigatio itc , thence along said Southwesterly
1 line South 35 0 03' East, - .a feet to t pint of curve on a 32.07 foot
radius curve right w} :,e central angle is 1 21'; thence along the arc
Q '•of said curve rin a distance of 27.06 feet to e point of tangent;
p � thence South 42' East, 160.40 feet; thence South °21' East, 42.79
feet to ti: point of hegi.nning; thence North 53 039' Las , 00 feet;
thenc South 36 Fast 240 feet; thence South 53 °21' ':Jest feet;
t ce North 36 1 21' blest 240 feet to the point of beginning.
:r..r W F.�i►/�
.l
FINUINGS'OF FACT, DECISION AND CONIDITIOir, ZE- IOIC -70 PAGE 2
CONCLUSION
Following review of the Planning Department file, consideration of the public
testimony, and circumstances in the area of proposal, the Zoning Adjustor concludes
that the proposal is not detrimental and is compatible with the Freeway Commercial
zone and with the original zoning granted for this property.
DECISI
From the foregoing Findings, a review of
ZE- 10IC 770, testimony at the public hearing,
hereby in APPROVING the proposal establishes
the Planning Department File No.
and a site visit, the Zoning Adjustor
the following conditions:
A. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1) The applicant shall develop the site consistent with the plot plan on file
with this application.
2) Futher, the applicant shall indicate sufficient space on the site plan to
accommodate on -site parking for the restaurant and service station facilities.
3) All buildings and structures require building permi.ts as per Section 301 of
the Uniform Building Code.
4) The required fire flow_ for this complex is 3000 GPM. This complex requires
2 fire hydrants to be installed.
5) The hydrants shall be installed as per approved water plan and shall be
installed prior to construction.
6) One hydrant shall be installed at the northeast corner of Barker and
Cataldo, the other hydrant shall be installed at the southwest corner of
the property.
7) Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the
use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authori-
zation is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the
Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and,subject to
specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health
District.
8) The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to
place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a UL1D by petition
method'pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s)
property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition
against the formation of a UILD by resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.94
which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not
prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s)
on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with
the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution under RCW Chapter
36.94.
9) Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtainer
from the Spokane County Engineer.
10) Applicant shall improve Cataldo Avenue in a manner consistent with Spokane
County TYPICAL roadway Section No. 1, minimum paving width Access Std.
11) Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road,
drainage and access plans prior to the issuance of a building permit on
the property.
12) A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved
by t';c Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit
on the property. The design, lucatiou, and arrangement of parkiny stalls
shall be in accordance with sttridard traffic engineering practices. PavinY
or surfacin_1 as approved by the Spokane County Engineer, will be required
fur .Illy poc tiun of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by
veh icjes.
13) 1hr, Word "applicant'' _,hall irir.lude the owner or owners of the property, his
Lairs, assigns and successors.
... continued
-r, '4w-
FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION AND CONDITIUilS, ZE- IOIC -70 PAGE 3
A. C ONDITIONS OF APPROVA (CONTINUED)
14) The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplish-
ed as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
15) Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements
are found in Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolution No.
80-1592 as amended.
DATED THIS J DAY OF 1984.
SPOKANE C NTY, WASHINGTON
NOTE: ANY PARTY AGGRIEVED BY THIS DECISION MUST FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN 10 DAYS OF
THIS DATE:
_-.
COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW
This building permit review is intended to appraise you of the improvements (roadway, side-
walk, curb, stormwater, etc.) which must be constructed in association with your building
permit. This checklist will be filled out by the Engineer's staff and a copy will be re-
turned to''you at the time that the permit is initialed by the Engineering Department. All
requirements shall be completed prior to issuance of the building permit. All unchecked
boxes require additional research or information to make a determination.
I. S[ormwater Drainage Considerations
A -der g�ae nes or Scormwater Management 1981" both on and off site.
1. 208 Considerations*
9
Yes
No
2. Flood hazard zone considerations **
1. Roads need to be improved. How wide
Yes
No
No
3. Storm Drainage Plan
No
Contact Person
Nam � q��}- So h
Business
Name 6,1. X T ✓�..c�a S N
Address
No
Address
Yes
Phone
Phone
2-,9 - G173
County Contact
Person Z e - S 1 ...
Phone No.
456 - 3600
COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW
This building permit review is intended to appraise you of the improvements (roadway, side-
walk, curb, stormwater, etc.) which must be constructed in association with your building
permit. This checklist will be filled out by the Engineer's staff and a copy will be re-
turned to''you at the time that the permit is initialed by the Engineering Department. All
requirements shall be completed prior to issuance of the building permit. All unchecked
boxes require additional research or information to make a determination.
I. S[ormwater Drainage Considerations
A -der g�ae nes or Scormwater Management 1981" both on and off site.
1. 208 Considerations*
9
Yes
No
2. Flood hazard zone considerations **
1. Roads need to be improved. How wide
Yes
No
No
3. Storm Drainage Plan
No
�3CRP /RID agreement (Copy of deed, contract, or
Yes
Yes
title report required.)
No
II. Planning Action # Ze ((5 ( L ?o
Yes
No
Yes $j
1. Rezone, Conditional Use or Variance on property
5. Sidewalk
Yes
ri
No
2. Are requirements of planning action incorporated
Yes tj
No
2. Approach Permit from Engineer's Office
Yes
No
No
into site plan
No
4. Is this road on 6 Year Plan
Yes
No
j ULID Agreement
Yes
No
VII. Field Review Preliminary Comments
III. Right of Way
1. Does permit necessitate R.O.W. dedication
Yes
No
2— Did zone change require R.O.W. dedication
U
Yes
m
No
3. Radius at corner
L 1
Yes
No
IV. County Road Improvements
1. Roads need to be improved. How wide
Yes
No
2. Curb
Yes
No
�3CRP /RID agreement (Copy of deed, contract, or
Yes
No
title report required.)
4. Plans for improvements provided
Yes
No
Yes $j
No
5. Sidewalk
V. Parking Plan 6 Approach Loc ation
1. Review and sign off by Traffic
Yes tj
No
2. Approach Permit from Engineer's Office
Yes
No
3. State or City sign off
Yes
No
4. Is this road on 6 Year Plan
Yes
No
j ULID Agreement
Yes
No
VII. Field Review Preliminary Comments
* All land within the Aquifer Sensitive Area, where deemed feasible by the County Engi-
neer, shall incorporate stormwater treatment to mitigate the potential for groundwater
degradation. (See Guidelines for Stormwater Management 1981, Spokane Board of County
Commissioner's Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended.)
** The purpose of flood hazard zone review is to minimize Losses due to flooding in spe-
cific areas designated by Flood Hazard Boundary maps on file at the County Engineer's
Office. (See Spokane Board of County Commissioner's Resolution No. 81 -0726, as
amended.)
4/11 84
�_._._,:
z 06 1 5 r-"Aq--d:
........ ... . 97
b ---. ,,. ,�... �- �, r...- -'-- �. °- ---�.
Pf
S
1-9
7 (y)
-0 Lr)
0
U EC-1
-0
, ' ,
a L— Zcy -
CQ
------------- - .......
'3
7o r-
9
TYPICAL SWALE SECTION
41
c
0. C. 5 9 6.
A
E�x I w
I "'Is
Ste' r
1 (7-'
J
4 •
* 7 0 T j
0
1
\N
I \
1<
z�
SO
4
IL
�d
I L
APPROVED AS NO I r-
0
. Cwsty R Engineer
D
BY
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
1z' 1c)
Surfa raiimasx. w*%"
got be permii3p T&IS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY
t o Off or': !
right of wq.� R UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
CIREMENTS
4
IL
�d
I L
APPROVED AS NO I r-
. Cwsty R Engineer
D
BY
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
NOTE:
Surfa raiimasx. w*%"
got be permii3p T&IS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY
t o Off or': !
right of wq.� R UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
CIREMENTS
S De. dir I
OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE
an adequate, PRIEST
citb dr
OF
IN 19
SPA U, -
- DEPT.
(Signed and Sealed)
Certificate No.
N'3 t
EGN w 9
O SSil(21�� '00