Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PE-1177-78 (2)
AGENDA, n,bRUARY 24, 1978 In NO. 456 -2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Time: Place: PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSFICATION 7., PE- 1177 -78, Fairacres Revlat #3 ZE- 22 -78, Agricultural to Sinzia v'anily pesidential a. Location: Section 9, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M. Lots 58, 59, 60, 61 and 62, Fairacres except the N 145 feet. Also except the W 80 feet of Lot 58, located in the N %z of Section 9. b. Sponsor: James E. Winner E. 11420 Grace Ave. Spokane, WA ' c. Engineer: Clarence E. Simpson Engineers, Inc. North 909 Argonne Spokane, WA 99206 d. Site Size: 2.14 Acres e. Number of lots: 7"$ . f. Land use proposed by sponsor:' Single Family Dwellings g. Existing Zoning' Agricultural h. Advertised Zoning: Single Family Residential i. Water Source: Irvin Water District j. School District: East Valley k. Method of sewage disposal: Individual on -site disposal systems 1. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. Friday, February 24, 1978, 1:30 p.m. County Health Department Auditorium, Room 140 West 1101 College - 17 - "z /O AGENDA, March 29, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Thursday, March 29, 1979 - 8:30 A.M. (Item #6 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME PE- 1177 -78., FAIRACRES REPLAT #3 ZE-22 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL a. Legal Description: "Section 9, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M. Lots 58, 59, 60, 61 and 62, Fairacres except the N 145 feet. Also except the W 80 feet of Lot 58, located in the N 1/2 of Section 9. b. Sponsor: James E. Winner E 11420 Grace Avenue Spokane, WA. 99206 c. Engineer: Clarence E. Simpson Engineers, Inc. N 909 Argonne Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Site Size: 2.14 acres e. Number of lots: 7 f. Proposed Land use: Single family dwellings g. Existing Zoning: Agricultural (established 4/24/42) h. Proposed Zoning: Single-Family Residential i. Water Source: Irvin Water District j. School District: East Valley k. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual on -site disposal systems 1. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. m. The sponsor is requesting approval of a Time Extension on this preliminary plat to April 1, 1980. 0 A' WELL SINTO EUCLI - ...__ SO� c • A N ONT BUCKEYE �PohANE. ®01177 -78 2.16 AG NANSFIFL H vE. ) N 1 1 "- 10 00 - BootiL 1 1 Ito E 0 i O 4 0 � STAFF ANALYSIS - March 29, 1979 PE- 1177 -78, FAIRACRES REPLAT #3 ZE- 22 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. History _ The preliminary plat was originally approved in February, 1978. The sponsor is now requesting an Extension of Time to April 1, 1980. The sponsor indicates that he is requesting a Time Extension because he needs to complete final arrangements with Irvin Water District for water service and connection. B. Location The proposal is located in the Central portion of the Spokane Valley on the northwest corner of Bowdish Road and Buckeye Avenue. C. Proposal ▪ 2.14 acres subdivided into 7 lots for single family use. ▪ Lot frontage = 80 feet • Lot size = 11,600 sq. ft. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION A. Circulation The County Road Engineer has not recommended any new conditions. Only those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record. B. Sewage Disposal The sponsor has proposed individual on -site sewage disposal systems which have been authorized by the Health District. C. Drainage The County Utilities Engineer reports that final construction plans must be reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat. D. Water Supply The proposal is within the boundaries of the Irvin Water District. E. Fire District The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Spokane Fire District #1. -6B- STAFF ANALYSIS - March 29, 1979 FAIRACRES REPLAT #3 - continued F. School District The proposal lies within the boundaries of East Valley School District #361. III. CONDITIONS: If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated separately and listed hereafter. 1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record. 2. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting a time extension to review any preliminary plat approval. 3. That a time extension be granted to April 1, 1980. 4, C- --.p&/ Lu( co o i /'A-4.1i 170 c - 6c - PL-ar.lwl WIG. C o.--..w.I s SI o..J AC'T.0 0 2 /24/ 78 15. PE- 1171 -78, CHESTER FIELD ADDITION: BONUCELLI, and ZE- 16 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND /OR TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat be approved and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings, dated February 24, 1978, as the Planning Commission's findings of fact as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's findings, except that the following condition eh6111 be incorporated: that the stub road connection to the east be eliminated. (Motion by Thomas, seconded by Byrne. Vote was 4 yes and 1 no.) 16. PE- 1173 -78, PONDEROSA ACRES 7TH ADDITION: PHILLIPS, and ZE- 18 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: That the preliminary plat request be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission's findings of fact as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's Findings dated February 24, 1978. (Motion by Byrne, seconded by Main. Vote was unanimous.) 17. PE- 1174 -78, WYATT ADDITION NO. 1: WYATT, and ZE- 19 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND /OR TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's findings as the Planning Commission's findings of facts, as well as, the conditions stated in the Staff's findings dated Feb. 24, 1978 except that the plat conditions dealing with a zone reclassification be modified to read as follows: That upon the filing of the final plat, upgrade lots 1 - 5 Block 2, to the Two Family Residential Zone Classification, and the balance of the plat known as Wyatt Addition No. 1, to the Single Family Zone Reclassification. (Motion by Main, seconded by Rawlings. Vote was unanimous.) 18. PE- 1175 -78, WAGGONER ADDITION: WAGGONER, and ZE- 20 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat known as Waggoner Addition be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission's findings of facts, as well as, the conditions stated in the Staff's Findings dated February 24, 1978. (Motion by Thomas, seconded by Byrne. Vote was unanimous.) 19. PE- 1176 -78, VAN BEES ADDITION: VAN HE'S, and ZE- 21 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's findings as the Planning Commissions findings of facts as well as, the conditions stated in the Staff's Findings dated February 24, 1978, except that the following condition of approval shall also be imposed: That individual lot access shall be prohibited to 12th Street. (Motion by Byrne, seconded by Main Vote was unanimous.) PE- 1177 -78, FAIRACRES REPLAT #3: WINNER, and ZE- 22 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's findings as the Planning Commission's findings of facts as well as, the conditions stated in the Staff's Findings dated February 24, 1978, except that the condition of the zone reclassification to the Single Family Residential Zone be deleted and the following condition is hereby imposed: That a statement be placed in the plat dedication that animal keeping by the sponsor be allowed until the last building permit is issued in the plat. (Motion by Rawlings, seconded by Thomas. Vote was unanimous.) 21. PE- 1168 -78, MIDIIAME FIRST ADDITION: MIDILOME, INC., and ZE- 13 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That an extension of time be granted to the next Planning Commission hearing of plats. (Motion by Thomas, seconded by Main. Vote was unanimous.) - 4 - FINDINGS PE- 1177 -78 - Fairacres Replat #3: Winner ZE- 22 -78 - Agricultural to Single Family Residential Staff findings regarding PE- 1177 -78, Fairacres Replat #3. I. GENERAL INFORMATION: A. Location Fairacres Replat #3 is located in the-north central area of Spokane Valley, west of Bowdish road and north of Buckeye Avenue, B. Proposal The applicant proposes to subdivide 2 3/2 acres into 8 lots all for Single Family Dwellings. Creating a density of about 3 units per acre with a typical lot size of 11,600 square feet per lot. C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan Fairacres Replat #3 is situated within an area that has been designated as being suitable for residential development by the approved map of the Comprehensive Plan. Within that Comprehensive Plan however, no density designation have yet been determined. D. Existing Land Uses II. SPECIAL INFORMATION: The site is presently vacant with no significant topographic features. The properties that generally suround this proposal have developed over the years into several residential subdivisions including: Fairacres Replat #1 and #2, Sunnyvalley Acres, Mirabeau Ranch Addition and Fairacres Mobile Homes Subdivision. E. Compatibility With Existing Land Uses The Staff finds this proposal to be compatible with recent Planning Commission decisions in the area as well as being compatible with the future intended uses for the area - higher density residential uses... Some conflicts might result however, in short term regarding the possible conflicts between larger lot uses in the area and the smaller lot subdivisions. A. Circulation The Engineer's Office has reviated this proposal and their office finds that both the plat design is acceptable to their office and that adequate County Roads are now available to serve the preliminary plat. Their office recommends however that as a condition of plat approval both paving and curbing of the roads in the proposal be required. - 1 7 - 1- PE- 1177 -78 - Fairacres Replat #3: Winner (Continued) B. Sewage Disposal The Health District has approved the use of individual on -site systems to serve this proposal The plat is however situated over the Spokane Valley Aquifer where moderate impact upon ground water quality may be expected at some future date if continued urbanization at this density continues to occur. C. Water Supply The proposed Subdivision is situated within the recorded service area of Irvin Water District. That water district indicates that it does have the ability to serve the site with both domestic and fire flows. D. Drainage The Staff finds that because of the relatively flat terrain of the site and that of the adjacent properties that no special drainage control methods would be required and standard techniques for storm water control could be employed. E. Fire Protection F. Parks The proposed subdivision is situated within the recorded service area of Fire Protection District #1 That district indicates that both mains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire protection needs should be required as a condition for plat approval. No County parks are currently available in the area and the County Parks Department has no present plan for either site acquisition or major park improvements. G. Schools The proposed subdivision is situated within the boundaries of the East Valley School District. That districts facilities are currently at capacity.levels. They, however, expect this problem to be mitigated somewhat when their current building program is completed in 2 or 3 years time. ZONING ANALYSIS The staff finds that it would appropriate to upgrade this proposal to The Single Family Residential Zone because of the use and the character of the proposal as well as the use and character of surounding area. The staff also finds that an upgrade to the Single Family Zone would be consistent with recent Planning Commission decisions. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The staff has reviewed the environmental checklist submitted by the applicant and we find that no significant adverse environmental impacts would likely resolve - 17 A - 0 4 PE- 1177 -78 - Fairacres Replat #3 and a proposed deblaration of nonsigni£icance should be issued. Slight adverse environmental impacts were however noted under the following questions: earth, air, water, noise, light and glare, land use, natural resources, population,. housing, transportation, public services, energy and utilities. V. CONDITIONS - 17 B - (Continued) If approval is granted, the Staff recommends the following conditions. Specific conditions applicable to this plat are referenced below and found in the attached supplement entitled, "Standard Conditions for Approval of Preliminary Plats - August, 1977 ". NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated separately and listed below. F-4 $°$', P'9.r_4March 1, 1979) 4515, all, Tom, -AR='f -ES; 4 7 , C list; Aer, Pith i :- That all roads in the plat be curbed and paved to specification of the County Engineers. Existing County Roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. . , pon filing of the final plat, upgrade Fairacres Replat #3 to the Single � ` r Family Residential Zone,Classification. ' That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21c. 080 RCW O rr and the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 77 -1392 be accomplished by the project Applicant within thirty days of formal action by the Board of County Commissioners; as instructed by the Planning Department Staff. Inter -office Communication To PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date FE1112UA211 I J 19 i G LA • LY, FUNNING & TRAFFIC DIVISION ENGINEER IC , Sebiegt ROAQ CONJTTION3 * 7OR QL. 11 f / - C2ES K0 1 �3 'CONpITION$ CIRCLED APPLY TO PLAT UNDER CONSIDERATION • that conditional approval of the plat is given subject to dedication of Right of Way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat by the County Engineer; that plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat; g .that drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and alignment of drain- age facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat; 4j construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who shall be responsible for perpetuating all evidence of the location of survey monuments which may be disturbed during construction and who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As £uilt" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements ware installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced; D no construction work is to be performed within the Public Right of Way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer; all construction within the Public Right of Way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in tha amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 7 -no direct access from lots to 1/2 right of ways until such time as additional right of ways are dedicated and roads are established as County Roads. 8 -no direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads. 9 -road design, rough grading construction, and drainage control for 1/2 rights of ways and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the Developer. 10 -that the Sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal accept- able to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway- County Road inter- section. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the respon- sibility of the Sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. 11 hat all roads within the plat be curbed and /or paved to the specifications of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved and /or curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. L The Board of Coi Commissioners Board of Equalization Spokane County Courthouse Spokane, Washington 99201 Gentlemen: in accordance with information recently received from the office of the County Engineer, I wish to again protest a certain matter in the above action. You will recall that I protested the charges assessed me for the above im- provements. I still hold that - it is unreasonable and unfair to assess any part of the property facing Bowdish Road to enhance the value of Mr. Goldberg's property to the north. Mr. Goldberg does not own an inch of land along the area from Grace to Buckeye. Over several years Mr. Goldberg has not, to my knowledge, paid a dime toward the upkeep (oiling) of this road. Now you rule we have Lo help him pay for improvements to his property. Is this really fair? This charge of more than 4! thousand dollars. forces me to to replat my remaining property in order to try in a small measure to keep up with in- flated living costs and higher taxes. As of today, the replat indicates that I cannot even sell the first lot because there is no road. Are we working here under two standards? If I ani forced to apply to increase the value of adjoining property, why cannot the Board also force the owner adjoining • Inc on the other side to pave and curb his property so that MY lots will. be worth more? . I signer) a paper stating I had been paid one dollar ($1.00) for five feet of roadway facing Grace. (Never did see the buck.) I.would be glad to dig down for two dollars more to buy the footage needed on the south side, along Buckeye, for a road (or street). kowd1sh is the main access road to Goldberg's property, as well as to the newly platted Pines West. We are supposed Lo he a democratic republic, are we not? Is this a democracy? Socialism at its highest plane? Political expendency? Or political cowardice? Does the Board cater to the money, to those who can write the biggest check? Thank you very much. Sincerely, 4. E. Winner cc: Co. Engineers /Clarence1. Simpson, Inc. Bob Bethards J. E. Winner E. 11420 Grace Spokane, WA 99206 December 16, 1977 R I D No. 298 Hearing Dec. 22 Resolution No. 77 -9 RECEIVED DEC 1 9 1977 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT •rnest' ^uinn 11105 Jackson Spokane, 7 -ash. 99206 P.T. Minn: J. 11h20 Crate - - Snokar , ::ash. 99206 - Feb. 18, 197? :Several weeks nitro I celled you re.gnrding, the possibility of petting from you nn Indication as to whether or rot you would he willing to grant an easement or dedication on a portion 'of your property for an access into the westernmost lot of mine which adjoins your property on buckeye. • At that time you indicated you had no desire to break up any part of your nronerty, ziving.valid reasons for your thinking.. ficwe9er, since our conversation' on the matter.. 1 would like to Incuire of you whether or not you would he willing to sell the area. (R.pnrnxim tely 3900 square feet, if 1 figure right) to me, which would alloy: me to build on the lot in order that my income. can be cunplemertec somewhat to compensate for the. steady rise in living costs. Ye have n neighbor who is a. competent builder. he would like to • build one house a year, relieving that such would be enough for • him and his family, lit being his thought that much of the cost of building is labor. Possibly half. 1 will plat it, but do not wish to sell ,an.y of - It unless it is. absolutely necessary. it does become necessary, it will have been nlatted. it most likely would cost less this year than - next, or. the one after that, or later. With kindest personal regards, 1 am, 926`2400 Jim ':inner f � J / Gd r./derA2 /t/.uvE� ichss ,cessa ,e. 508 FT, /%07.6166 ex) eat g %octt e / � T / gvo of i3 ) ',gess/ uiAs 4 , l 44 - 4z.0 y 41,P71G /Pq7 /D/0 /57o iv,as . / B/ ° L li7i74*A/ Sc o- St77 24 /yn ,/ V-0/ , / lb e'e , ,,�� 34 /979 N,�L /V /4z o aeg /0 �o,v''vc'ro 7746 M eed /7, /% /0 77Aot/ /Cost Die atheer Av Jot( 4, /979 Avoe 47 / 'a - hirveu . r o srox/ C h'oez 4s &a y- 0t /-vo�� � o f JcZ7' /0.'J . Gli vane _ ao efnje / )/ i manen R7 �- y ee y . , MA.41CJ4 - A-Pia (97 (c) PIt uwntn.142`( £ 9'QsSto "J / S l �<, ,� SvnJ L:�✓6R S, O N To (Pne, 0054 -<,. P' D L J, &ez s ACCESS ?Ito WtNtjet 50'-A r_ Kerb M A`? 19 ( " cog" ; trzAcrze_ IZ.EPL4T - 2.. !-Le Ftalma 1-}CI,D , RA r SH -ou.)S W,NN&2 .OWN! Sept I 9/ (0 PL loos AA Lep As EEPtir AD.IDr DISCU SSeorls wIrtf - SlvtnP€e GA," 4. o .w /,vn e A Cccs. S P) to & LEM I N&f ft Arr QY s hat.) i DEC., ' J 1l W 'Novak, - Nor ABLE To 061A1 W R4 Farprin . a. tr .1 o ect o& s i o �oo e.))/ T/ Lot 9azU mI N a2y PIA-1 r, sr-'W D Sy 2X /snA/4 1. v . — o o 1974-rn1 2M Rao en' C Ntr 01 -NO SuCt %$ ,a/W L 1`] W w Q umikj SotkYI N (0. . 14E w t t-t- p4 / . A2 i' V/. R•-)o4JL( l91 /VINnitE2 S ern t7'S Fits- 7 L_oy Pao PO st L PtA uP BV Stw,ps-o &WC2s. SF4o,..1s p02A-ay W24#040vtiD AT . I✓k /es r cti o " s " /Z . 4-�t 2.p -G PgChoua2V /978 Pt$_tumIN4zy PLAT 1111 4e-ne,roG - P210l2 14- alePtle 2GVIseo PQCLLM,NaC'/ et-4T 5o131I I T TAD - Sf%b3't.LG 8 Lars AN ID pr PoseD. Lk . g-XTE A homC 13c)' •.wCsT ot= EXIST.A/ ' eW. 1 4+eA2, a� KM- . VJ t NI NI E12 A-, D l-4-is 4 / N eEk -4 11Q Pl 2 , ll 1 I N N l - /4 JZs; C.D rp pat) u,,oc . kiGt4T b1= wAy NEEDED - ro ACCESS .vm6 W CSreU.Ly La ot= Gthnme ST! t _t_ S H oLo S o 7 pa (2-421/4/ Rats.' CA0 m)-13 A T u.) E sr a,./,D op PLAT PA O Poss4 -L VvE Cco" -3cu /U /-/- /S ..Pao Pos A.-1D DE516rJ Po-L, 191a Se veg L pis c1uSSWAJt 'wtrH Mt. W c r✓N e2 , Ft—'s aG,,•.n =r-cL Am k s Sa ...I /- 192 (� t AJAR =/Z . ( Afr.- ) .NT tJ Fat ME _Cry- oI= REG42.a (N(o 1JEEOEO 2.,V./ PosSL8LE A-LTetr.taTlvES ua ITr4 P:v\-/ CXTCn/Sco.../ ETC, BtcAUSE M. Qu1ti too tNat N"G LN T eQ Tct) / /J HEr...PJ'VV NIe2 L1/41‘17-1 Rid DEO' Csi - Tna J U.4 art. 191 W► MM 'Yu D I L{ Gt t�o�" IN6 A-131_.0 To arnC up (.� tF Anri ALTEr2N AT/ US .DES / 6�/ TAG \f CocaLo AGC6P.T »s D F • w e we t- 4 --4ve: out RkA/ p. a co ,.ri,4LT Mn1 Z Pa 601- CD. To wt Aac e 4- 'FLY / � Ar■.) vn -2Y f 91 5 V \ / 1'N Nl.2 was p2Ese rrED (NUJ's . 7 e-en$ 04= sETrwn 11 ti!� 4 C AGA-c pD o 77 -f_ Ocrops “k /979 i Utica \(E s (S7 &) 3ae= t Out ENV giv co &T,gcra 1✓I Q- CU' aJ A BovT DEO/ 0t77n26 30' S-r u P o f 2,14 _ 4D 7 y re»-' 1: t 1 UE 0e-talC41T-, _ Q,uiuN A-GtZ ED ltz OOC DIC Qv A T No cosT ro Co un , �Y 0 2. IJ•) I N N e2 o f Cz AJ D c. rq / J TAT Qoa• D r w, Prtailv?•Y,F uT5 .u0 T • Ceisr I-+I n ¥ Si 774/M6 , o 7 7/9-7 - PPOPett - Y . a c • Gov_CED Bolt+ AT UJ, NNLQS - EY Pais S. J aJ U.1 2-i Ti nl . .�AN�Af IS 1919 A c M 12_ i (Ai i t.1 a s sib &FO A-Co EirlEL/l 4,tiuo _ Ecu r E tic/ ,D CeD 1O”. Cas Arg . 9 _ Mo,u4 29 � 1 919 Prr..cu,M PLAT - - eKreAlSCcaJ 6 E r the 1-1-CJ Ago 6Xre'vsto,) a c n c- AI Ea) CD ro W4 E! ,STi Cr A.c.,.(2.eety,eku % Can rH AJI NNE' R r.' n PLAT G/ 1-57.0 — 8 LOTS SHow,NG 1P02-' -nY TURN/fit/de +� %t/"0ST .or 4/Ahv 2S Pao PacrY , RvJ Deg c..k iCD Et (L PO 3■■.c.- 9--ova -0 _Do Q? 0 se MA QCE 1990 4 IFS os /t4Iai ptC. Oc-w Ea 1919. 1-i JAL P I F:I 1. -0 , cow StnJCE 20AD w4s AJor Co%J s i l2v Cr ED PR-ta R. �� FI LU &JC of FiN4L PLA T. Mk CJ/Anuc -R. Post%D 01 . PE2FO2rnlcuc . 130 P GU4tAsJ rEalr.1 ROAD co'sTlWC'a J Pot E wesT /36 . l Z FEET OF I) ccEV Arc, NOT Co U E2iED 2• R% D # 311 . &A n ouNT Coo etzs ITEIM S o F auSTAC77 J S I buy of-) -I o� PLA A P2E PA's -E D 3'/ W t n.)&Jets N<ollvr =E1Z ADD 4 Paz J'ED f- l w\ . �GL.0 DES GUI.- PE -SR � ADD 13A21LtE2, 2nA-D C'p;a z0Ction_I e SE EnI Et I B17 PC-T/ POW 2eceveD: E1,0 APRIL 19 ,C. TO 4 3n 02-647 JutvE 1519 Coeur /ACT ALL) 4120ED td00 21C C.eMPL tEQ 774 - 47 - S0w.ma2 d 042t -'/ FA L.(_ RID Y 311 ply/ILI-ZED Couvuty PA YS APP/1oX 1200 Tow ARC U3t ASSE5S'm� 6� 2Ast S W l AJfJ ez, S'I /,NEj 1kkb PcTITto' po_t T PLAT %EitJ APPloUEO, OcroBE2. 1580 PEtwut 1SSUe.D Fall w,NNE2 cO J1 Ac rmr.. o . c©�SmuC.T WEST 13G. R. ciecvE To APPJZ Ji-L) I7Lap,/S. c o5 /o41i1 1 PA 1 SL 4 CAIEHS ReP i #3 � c — 9 I -PE az.\/ I�81 MA (u-1 —1 198 AMRii_ 198.1 MA`f Ise Vx /I IVA/e2 Cain pc5' Etari (. CA,DE n.'sT- u..RT7ot. C©N S ?2AJC.TLOtJ bki OF wo 2tC. ' 3®t-lo 12El. . 0,U -rzp 012.aE25 E NCojt .CiZ To IA ACC eSYABusi4 EArr pE - P027" WVaJT--/ C— N6 /NEic2. 'tc.o' MAeMfl s RSA 13 E .ES TA 'Q S_t-1 C-CD R Z oc>e)240 J , PriAd-D w\. 1 tur /a -,✓CC. r a)DA t'tZ 1:o rV-4 -1E FI NA L. DgC I SIO4 oa GS r4auSl +n/� Ee1/4) . tt c.o.— . No q ri o 4 o f ' r- F. -. C.A.I. LISP N x3 w k O 9 SEC.9T25N.R.44E ! / o % ft f Scale' -400' t M 104 105 -a.cn 1 fi �p. x{2 14 37 t9 49 MMIEITA N4. • 0 • • 50 51 41TER47/04,44 R. Ty q pU- ° vl-' 46444 1.40. 1404 • Not Constructor/ -! C 0 0 O mom 22111111111111110111 " Ims n00000®®l a m. ' mo m��m itomm IWIlIt !lI1w. rigEmsfiriej ifflassi 4. 01111111Fillt C 1 inn tan! v ftY t i, i r 4 a 5 ry w .i iRll�l • 7 G 4 3 [ 0 3 24 ` .41 i1 Y 12 J • 4 Ar89 ° 51 1 0 = 30 ° RT. I . Tr: 190.5' Lr 299.5' P T.93.0tl — 3 C 889'348596.5 T.P.39♦ � 4 St 23 Spokane County Engineering Department Second Floor, Public Works Bldg. N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 Gentlemen: E. 912 - 26th Spokane, WA 99203 March 1, 1982 Re: Fairacres Replat #3 ' •- r5 /A, // 11'' tYY‘PgLr:G a The subdivider of Fairacres Replat #3, James E. Winner, passed away last summer. My duties as administrator of his estate include to conclude any of his affairs which were left unsettled. This subdivision established Buckeye Avenue (dedicating the north 20 feet) from Bowdish to Woodward. The westerly portion of the plat - Lot 1 and part of Lot 2 - was served by an extension of Buckeye improved by private contract. As most of the staff there can attest, there was considerable dis- cussion with respect to the fence to protect the adjoining property of Mr. Quinn, the barricade, the plans and profile of the cul -de -sac, the mislocated WWP pole and, ultimately whether the improvement and obstruction bond could be released. Can you tell me whether all matters relating to this plat have been completed to your satisfaction? I am unaware of any claims by material suppliers, complaints from abutting landowners or correspondence from the County, at least to mid - January when I stopped the mail to Mr. Winner's residence. If everything is in order, I would very much appreciate a letter to that effect for my files. Thank you. Since Larry Winner, Administrator Estate of James E. Winner Larry Winner East 92.2 - 26th Ave. -` Spokane, :WA 99203' • 'March 10, 1982. Dear Mr.. Winner In answer. to your letter :dated March 1;1982, I researched our files ,.and could find no record of a street obstruction bond ta out by :Mr. Winner. I did find, however, a bond for roadway_ improvements in our files which was released ,:February 6, ,1981. ', A copy of the letter, releasing this bond` is enclosed, If you have any further auestions, feel free to call`me,,at 456 -3600 Very yours, Robert :.S. Turner- ,,F.E. Countv_,Engineer Joloadsul leld swss £JJac Jaaui6u3 Xlunoj auelods 3•d 'JauJnj •s liago 'sunoA' £1nJl A'JaA •pasealaa aq Mou A'ew 00•58L`£$ 3o lunowe ayl ui leld ;Joys pauoiluaw -anoge a43 ui s3uawanoadwl AeMpeOJ Jo3 Obbllw3 aagwnN puo8 leyl pasinpe aq aseald :uawatlua9 LLII 3d 'E# lelda8 saJwat ej :321 1861 '9 Snnagaj JauugM •3 'C :oo las /SC 01366 VM `aue )jodS Z5 x08 '0 'd •03 6utpuog puelul BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. L 05 IN THE MATTER OF ) ESTABLISHMENT OF ) BUCKEYE AVENUE ) RESOLUTION - ESTABLISHMENT COUNTY ENGINEER'S FILE NO. 1967 ) This being the day set for the hearing on Spokane County Engineer's Report on the proposed establishment of BUCKEYE AVENUE, proceedings for which were initiated by PRE- LIMINARY RESOLUTION 81 - 0378 , and it appearing to the Board on proof duly made that Notice of Hearing was published and posted in the manner and for the time required by law, and the Board after examining the report and maps of the Spokane County Engineer and all claims and papers on file and after hearing all other evidence adduced at the hearing; and IT FURTHER APPEARING That the right of way has been dedicated as a public road, 50 feet wide and that said road is a public necessity and the same should be opened and established as a County road. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, that the hereinafter described road as reported by the Spokane County Engi- neer on the 28th day of April, 1981, being more particularly described as follows: BUCKEYE AVENUE- from the West right -of -way line of Bowdish Road Westerly to and including turnaround. Located in the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of Section 9, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M. as shown in the plats of Sunny Valley Acres - No. 325 and Fairacres Replat No. 3 - No. 1177. and as shown by the records and maps on file in the office of the Spokane County Engi- neer be and the same hereby is established as a County road and the same shall be known as BUCKEYE AVENUE No. 1967. The road supervisor of the road district in which the said road is located is hereby directed to open and maintain the same for public use and travel. PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Wash- ington, this l2thday of MAY , 1981. ATTEST: VERNO . ORLAND BY o.4i CLE: OF THE BOARD D E PUT Y BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AGREEMENT IN THE MATTER OP' Buckeye Fond No. 1967 . Spokane County, Washington. This agreement made and entered into this_ 5t]r day of January 1579, between (Grantee) Spokane County, 'Ja-shi.ngton, and (Grantor) IQr James E. Winner, E11420 Grace Avenue. Spokane, Washington. The Grantor proposes to subdivide certain lands he owns, to be known as Fairacres hoplat No. 3. In connection with the proposed. plat, as submitted, it is necessary for 'Spokane County to secure additional right of way for the extension of Buckeye .Avenue. For and in consideration of Spokane County securing the additional right of way the Grantor hereby agrees to deliver to Spokane County, a check in the amount of i; 350.00 for installation of fencing, consisting of Steel T -Fo st and three (3) strands of barbed- wire, along the County right of way described as beginning• at a point 30 feet }forth o:i the Northwest coiner of the West 130.66 feet of the Northeast Quarter (NE) of the Southeast Quarter (SE- -) of the Northwest Quarter (Pfir; ): thence South a distant 30 foot to said Northwest corner: thence East along the North line of said blest 130.66 feet to the Past line thereof. The matter of improving Buckeye Avenue is not a part of this agreement. I11 WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto :sot my hand this 5th day of_ January_ 1979. Y: ount✓ "pr, ear _ :late /c) STATE OF' 4I ?,SIlINGTON ) COUNTY OF . :y0t:_AUi. ) On this day personally anpeared before me James T. 'Winner, known to mo to he the individual described herein who executed. the within and foregoing instru- ment and achnowledre that hu signed tho same his free and voluntary act and decd for the uses and purposes therein mention. Given under ray hand and seal this 5_thday of January 197c. 45124 C 2 /. , ' --/Cil!"- t Granter) 1979. ?4A- T F T - k k AcLes P-3 "17 yr'ub] is :nd for tho :tat) `.ir.ftcn ] :c::i.d.ing; at 'pok_nn. '.JLtiiIin,ton. Gentlemen: JEW /vssm cc: Mr. McVicker file • Washington State Bar Association 505 Madison Street Seattle, Washington 98104 J.E. Winner E. 11420 Grace Spokane, WA. 99206 March 30, 1981 NA I am compelled to report what I believe to be pretty shoddy treatment by a local attorney: Mr. Ronald L. McVicker, E. 90D9 Trent, Spokane, WA.,, -� 99206. Mr. McVicker was recommended to me by another attorney, who was. not availab:l'e to me in'the time frame desired. I have been embroiled with the County Engil`neeri g Depart nt (to be known as the Bureau for easier identification). Frequent changes in specifi'ations, as well as undue delay in same, has been quite costly to me, both \financially .nd emotionally. An emergency forced the sale and replat of a portion of my property. The Board granted the change, excepting the weterly lot, later insisting that a cul-de-sac beinstalled. A neighbor to the south granted me right -of- access to the lot, asking only that I provide a barrier to keep vehicles out of his hayfield. 1 had planned to- e,good used railroad ties tied together by at least 4x8 timbers. The Bureau informed that they had secured an easement, informing me that I would have to connect a head .flo and give them a check for $350.00 for a fence. It was my firm impression that 'his fe e, built for the Bureau and donated to the neighbor, was to be the barrier. cOwas no the case. The Bureau forced me to take out a bond for paving and curbing In mor an a year, this bond was not used, and the work was not performed. I did not renew the bond, feeling that it, as well as fence, (now dilap dated) was a rip -off. I had money on deposit for the work. The by now, had 'p sented my engineer with specifications for the cul -de -sac, an added expense. I feel he Bureau should have included these specifications two years earlier in the origina Mr. McVicker called me on the phone and indicated that I should inform.oth utility company that a pole had to be moved, which I did. It was set in the cuL -d se ac right of way. Mr. McVicker's office was aware of all of these things His ad says no charge for initial consultation (except in my case). I wonder if he was °not aware that he was being con- sidered for an appointment with the County at the time. If a surgeon hands the scalpel to an intern, the surgeon is still the responsible party. Are the canons of the legal pro- fession less strict (remembering my anguish when I bought the property)? Does caveat emptor apply to the hiring of legal assistance? I do not feel that I was properly served. I will not argue that I was not - -am not -- being serviced. Sincerely, J. E. Winner Inter- office Communication To From / - co s2 s OFF L.;E OF COUNTY ENGIi.LER Ph Subject 44.ree.e / • O SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date ' // o 19-91 c /e /Case , ed9 O i V4 0 hvL ara-o -4"-nc /esa-c - a e i J-4 ctrelJ o / `Ts e a s xa o -mss <r a U j Ge ,f.,.- . bye // rS-G vLr a--07a CJ/ eZ Ile e e End GtelfrctAl1 /nom/ form 327 -C.R. c�(VLt[e.�pf�7l��u / `� /L�c7 TL ?p, / (C.-44 „ ✓// F u Office .,of County Engineer N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, Wash . •. 99201 Gentlemen J. E. Winner E. 11420 Grace Spokane, Wash. 99206 Feb. 5, 1981 This will request that'you make an inspection of the 'barricade . constructed on the westerly,boundary of Fairacre Replat No. 3, as specified by your office. Painting has not been done. Warmer weather is necessary before , paint will. adhere to.any surface. Right' Also, it would appear. that the..paving might not;be according. to specification. Water appears..t.o..run the •wrong:direction,.if it ever .rains. Alos, it was an terribly sioppy job of fence building your,department did.'The fence. you stuck me with is already down. Regarding'the. fence; there seems to be a•variance. In order that the Commissioners can keep informed,about problems as they arise on this plat, I must .ask that a carbon copy be sent to them, as Well as to the Attorney's office. The Attorney, if there is something wrong about me being charged for the fence, has a duty tp prosecute, has he not? • It is my hope, but not my. expectation, that it not take another three years before th_e plat is finally approved and'all accounts settled; Could you possibly persuade the Commissioners and the Attorney to look at the'fence, so they will know what we are talking about? ' And the astounding, nasty thought just hit me! What if someone in your department is setting up someone else in.the department'.. If he loses his job there,' what would the poor•felloW do7.if he ' can't work for the bureau, where, pray tell, could he find work? cc /County Commissioners ,County Prosecutor. Sincerely, J.'E..Winner FEBO ! 'g 1 P .S. Please communicate in'writing. P'cannot remember too well at my age. Example: Forgot to mention reflectors will be put'in place when painting is finished. Thank you. OFF. i OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGIr ER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON APPLICATION TO PERFORM WORK ON COUNTY ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY PERMIT N ,�( D,� NAME OF APPLICANT Inland Asphalt Company DATE NO.. ADDRESS E . 6614 Main - Spokane, WA PHONE NO. 534 -2657 JOB NO STATE CONTR'S LICENSE NO D079109 -81 The undersigned hereby applies for permission to Grade, crushed rock, and asphalt paving on Buckeye west of Woodward - Fairacres Replat No. 3. Pursuant to franchise Job for Mr. Winner.. Dated Date Work to Start 10/22/80 The estimated time required for completion of the above work is 10 days which the petitioner agrees to prosecute with all diligence and speed with due regard for the rights, interests and conveniences of the public. Petitioner further agrees to perform' the work in strict compliance with the provisions enumerated below and states that he has read and will adhere to the general provisions applicable to permits contained on the reverse side of this form. The undersigned guarantees that if the backfill, street surfacing or improvement.fails within one year from the date of final inspection by Spokane County, he shall pay the cost of the County for making repairs' or restoration of the roadway and improvements. In consideration of the granting of this permit it is agreed by the applicant that the County of Spokane and any officer or employee thereof shall be saved harmless by the applicant from any liability of responsibility for any accident, loss or damage to persons or property, happening or occurring as the proximate result of any of the work undertaken under the terms of this application and the permit or permits which may be granted in response thereto, and that all of said liabilities are hereby assumed by the applicant. It is further agreed that if any part of this installation interferes with the future use of the highway by the general public, it must be removed or relocated, as designed by the engineer at the expense of the Z 1 1 permitee or his successor in interest. '' 449X ne Y BV SIGNED TITLE r r° Fcci n - 3 1, i 7 7 INSPECTION FEE 8 TOTAL /D PERMIT FEE A bond in the amount of is required to insure compliance with the above conditions, said bond to be kept in full force and effect for a period of years following completion of work authorized by this permit. INSPECTION REQUIRED — 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED CaII Permit Office 456 -3600 to notify when work begins and schedule ins ion This permit shall be void unless the work herein comtemplated shall have been completed before 1) / 1 / 36 19_ COUNTY ENGINEER CI j4 ^tit2Z01 - DATE PERMIT Subject to all the terms, conditions, and provisions written or printed below or on any part of this form. PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED the above applicant to: kA K 60 It is the responsibility of the applicant to notify all utilities and private property owners when such property is liable to injury or damage through the performance of the above work and the applicant shall make all necessary arrangements relative to the protection of such property and /or Utilities. UTILITY DAMAGE IS COSTLY. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. E. 11420 Grace Spokane, Washington 99206 September 5, 1980 RECEIVED SEP 1980 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Accompanying photostat shows a duplicate charge imposed on me by the Bureau which calls itself Engineers. You will note the check (No. 209, for 3350.00, dated January 5, 1979, and cashed June 15, 1979), was for a fence and barrier built by the County as, they assert, a condition to granting clearance on a plat of land for a building permit. This same Bureau now does not accept its own work as being acceptable, and has imposed upon me, for a barricade, an additional sum. (Indicated on the enclosed). My Dear Candidate: It is my firm belief that this is either a fraud, a rip -off, or Bureau- cracy in its purest form. Which poses the question; Is the Bureau spawned and nurtured by the Board of Commissioners, or are the Commis- sioners merely tools of the Bureau? (The Bureau, by the way, took nearly two years to grant the permit, changing specifications, etc., it seems to me, about every time the moon changed, and finally running out of ideas for same.) It would be my belief that we should change Commissioners, in the hope that a new Board would take firmer control over the Bureau, if such ?is possible. What promise could you make in this direction? With best wishes for a successful campaign, I am, Sincerely, JEW /vssp cc's County Newspapers. J. E. Winner I RECEIVED usri:1 “," ,. a i , t retilNEMI SEP]. 1 t+HO • ti P. S. Having spent my working years around a newspaper (just a country printer) it is my wish that a copy of this be sent to the newspapers of the County, which I will do. I am still just gullible enough to believe the story will be told.... You, will recall that the Water- gate story came to light through the columns of a newspaper, not out of a Bureau office. SO 5I •OnANC COUNTY cOUFI HOUSE Y Larry Winner Suite 602 % NM i W. 711 Spokane Fal s Blvd. Spokane, WA, 99201 Dear Mr. Winner: cc Paul Jensen Robert McCann Tom Davis iSle:\41%. TM PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET 1 PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 • Dec, 11, 1979 As you requested in our telephone conversation this morning, I have investi— gated possible problems in getting a building permit on Lot 1, Block 1, Fairacres- glat No, 3. Enclosed is the final plat dedication (copy) and a copy of that por— tion of the plat map that includes Lot 1, Block 1. It is the opinion of Paul Jensen, assistant subdivision administrator, and Robert McCann, county road engineer, that the legal building line for the lot in question is 25 feet back from the point where the cul de sac easement intrudes farthest into the platted lot, the highest point in the arc of the radius, in other words. Any purchaser should be advised of this restriction and should also be made aware that no construction is allowed within the radius described as part of the cul de sac. This would include driveways. For more information, feel free to call on Paul Jensen, Robert McCann or me. Sincerely, i ; 1, James V. Wavada II Public Information Coordinator :,c(6, i� NO. BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 3 IN THE MATTER OF CHANGING THE ZONING MAP FROM ) AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R -1)) ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 25N,) RANGE 44, E.W.M., SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ) ZE -22 -78 7 79 1612 The above - entitled matter coming on regularly for hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, on this day, and it appearing to the Board that the Spokane County Planning Commission has given due notice of the hear -. ing on the matter in the manner and for the time provided by law; that said Planning Commission has held a public hearing as required; and that the said Planning Com- mission concurs in the plan to zone the following described property as: ky: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R -1): All that area platted as Fairacres Replat #3, located in Section 9, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the above - described property be, and the same hereby is zoned under the classification of SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R -1) as defined in the Zoning Ordinance of Spokane County, adopted August 25, 1953, as amended. PASSED • BY THE BOARD THIS DAY 01' TTTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON VERNON W HLAND Clerk of A :oard Deputy his is to certify that this is d true and :orrect copy of Resolution Jo. � - . /2_, passed by he Bourd'tt': /d :y of NO 26 . 19 Deputy R E S O L U T I O N NOV 2f, S79 , 1979. •. • •a JERRY C. KOPET HARRY M LARN €B 1 tY7 f No. 79 14a7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON. IN THE MATTER OF FILING THE FINAL PLAT ) OF FAIRACRES REPLAT #3 LOCATED IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 25N, RANGE 44 E.W.M SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 7 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, that the final plat of FAIRACRES REPLAT #3 Lots 58, 59, 60, 61 and 62, in Fairacres except the N 145 feet. Also except the W 80 ft. of Lot 58, located in the N 1/2 of Section 9, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M. Spokane County, Washington more precisely described in the plat dedication, on the recommendation of the Spokane County Planning Commission, be, and the same hereby is approved, with the exception that the public rights of way ded.cated in this plat will not be established for maintenance purposes until. the County Engineer has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a sep- arate resolution of the Board of County Commissioners. t i PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS PE- 1177 -78 ) ATTEST: By: VERNON W. OHLAND Cle of the Board ) ) 0CT 1 - 5 1979 , 19 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON. DAY OF R E S O L U T I O N RAY W. CHRISTENSEN, CHM. JERRY C. KOPET HARRY M . LARNE - SFUN,.• Cu1 .uu.l nu 11 Dear Sirs Sirital Corn*: orr!oa or. COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT 5. TURNER COUNTY ENGINE.. Naboasas.aras ,Wwnnaxerrocc 1102411 • Grading Surfacing Gt rsol CLC s Drainage Other /iii+ r s- t ca-Ile 600 Subdivision Names , , ra I re's ,e":"A. By 29 25 =° o0 Tours very truly, Robert S. Turner, P.E. County Engineer One of the requirements set forth by the Spokane County Planning Cosiuission connection with the above titled plat involves the filing with this office of a Street Improvement Bond. A preliminary inspection of the plat hae.been made by this office and the amount of the Street Improvement Bond found.to be as :follows AMOUNT OF STREET IMPROVEMENT BOND $ ? 7Are A Street Improvement Bond in the above amount aunt be filed with this office prior to approval of the final plat. The bond will be released only upon satisfactory completion of the required street improvement. Please contact this office when work on the improvement is ready for inspection, or if you desire additional information or advice concerning the work. 24,t, Inter- office Communication To i77 (€' From Subject OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER 4rr-7 S wrz_� — � GC ■ ra r a /Min & 1/ 30 Form 327 -C.R. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date —'3.'72 19 7s it Cu ,L F .2_63 ' c,v , p spd 9 # it° 6/2-5 Z3/2---" 400,00 OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date ' — a 7997 Inter - office Communication To Jetty S; � s From G&ny ^ l Subject Fa ; R AcIQ-- 41IQ([i ✓� o„c�o RQIte Form 327 —C.R. 0 0 ROADI.JAY IMPROVECNT BOND CM -11440 KNOW ALL YEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, James E. Winner of Spokane, Washington, as PRINCIPAL and MIDLAND INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation organized and existing under the laws of tha State of Nevr.York and authorized to transact a surety business in the State of Washington, as SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, as OBLIGEE, in the penal sum of . Three Thousand Seven Hundred Eighty Five Dollars * * * * * 3, (3,785.00 ) DOLLARS lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, the ?RINCIPAL and SURETY bind themselves, their heirs, executors, adminis- trators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED thislst. day of October , 19 79 WHEREAS, the said PRINCIPAL is the developer of • tract of land in Spokane County known as Fairacres Replat #3 and being located in Section 9 , Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.H., in Spokane County, Washington and said County has required that a bond be furnished in an amount sufficient to pay the construction costs of installing to the approved grades, curbs, sidewalks, and /or paving of roadways adjacent to said development and such other work as is incidental and necessary thereto all in accordance with County Road Department Specifications and to the satisfaction of the County Engineer; such improvements to be completed in two years or less time unless said time period be extended at the option of the County Engineer. Upon failure of the PRINCIPAL to comply with the requirements stated herein . within the time authorized, the OBLIGEE shall look to the SURETY for satisfaction to the extent of this BOND. The obligation of this BOND shall be kept in full force and effect until, in the opinion of the OBLIGEE, the requirements herein stated have been satisfied in which event written release will be given by the OBLIGEE, the OBLIGEE having sole right to grant such release and the SURETY hereby waives all rights to release from the obligation except as herein stated. Principal Midland Insurance CompanyN R A Nr SEAL' :•; c?. n :-oE acE) 'c POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this Power -of- Attorney is not valid unless attached to the bond which it authorizes executed. It spec- ifies the LIMIT OF THE AGENTS AUTHORITY AND THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY, HEREIN, THE AUTHORITY OF THE ATTORNEY -IN -FACT and THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED * * * TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS * * * USE OF MORE THAN ONE POWER VOIDS THE BOND MIDLAND INSURANCE CO., a New Vork corporation, having its principal office in New Vork City, State of New York, does hereby make, constitute and appoint K. Ladd Kafflen in the City of Spokane , County of Spokane State of Washington its true and lawful attorney -in -fact, at Spokane in the State of Ala • shington to make, execute, seal and deliver for and on its behalf, and as its act and deed, bonds, and undertakings in behalf of court fiduciaries, who under the jurisdiction of a court, administer property held in trust; public official bonds; license and permit bonds; tax, lien, and miscellaneous bonds; required by Federal, State, County, Municipal Authority, or other obligees, provided that the liability of the company as surety on any such bond executed under this authority shall not in any event exceed the sum shown above. THIS POWER VOID IF ALTERED OR ERASED This power not valid unless used before December 31, 1979 The acknowledgement and execution of any such document by the said Attorney -In -Fact shall be as binding upon the Company as if such bond had been executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of this Company. This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of MIDLAND INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 11th day of May, 1977. "RESOLVED, that the President or any Vice President or any Secretary may appoint Resident Vice Presidents, Resident Assistant Secretaries and Attorneys -in -Fact in any State, Territory or Federal District to represent this Company and to act on its behalf within the scope of the authority granted to them in writing, which authority may include the power to make, execute, seal and deliver on behalf of this Company as surety, and as its act and deed any and all bonds and undertakings of suretyship and other documents that the ordinary course of surety business may require, including authority to appoint agents for the service of process in any jurisdiction, State or Federal and authority to attest to the signature of the President or any Vice President or any Secretary and to verify any affidavit or other statement relating to the foregoing, and to certify to a copy of any of the By -Laws of the Company and to any resolutions adopted by its Board of Directors or Executive Committee and any such Resident Vice President, Resident Assistant Secretary or Attorney -in -Fact may be removed and the authority granted him revoked by the President or any Vice President or any Secretary or by the Board of Directors or Executive Committee:" All authority hereby conferred shall continue until revoked by said Board of Directors or by the Executive Committee thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Power of Attorney to be signed and its corporate seal to be affixed this 1St' day of October 19 79 ATTEST: STATE OF NEW YORK SS: COUNTY OF NEW YORK On this 1St• day of October 19 79 before me a Notary Public, personally appeared J. Powel and M.S. Chenault who being by me duly sworn, acknowledged that they signed the above Power of ¥torney as Secretary & President of the said MIDLAND INSURANCE CO. and acknowledged said instrument to be the voluntary act and deed of said Co oration. Notary Public, New York County, New York. My Commission Expires: March 30, 1980. BON 43 (7/79) 5M pi 180 WATER STREET, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10008 SECRE MIDLAND INSURANCE COMPANY dt' RV PRESIDENT THIS POWER DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF BONDS FOR LOAN GUARANTEES Notary Public MARGARET 0 ANIERI tery Public, State of New York No. 24- 5915075 Ouelified in Kings County Cart. tiled in New York County Term Expires March 30, 1980 CM 11440 1. ONLY ONE POWER OF ATTORNEY MAY BE ATTACHED TO A BOND. 2. POWER OF ATTORNEY MUST NOT BE RETURNED TO ATTORNEY IN FACT, BUT SHOULD REMAIN A PERMANENT PART OF THE OBLIGEE'S RECORDS. 3. THIS POWER DOES NOT AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF BONDS OF NE EXEAT OR ANY GUARANTEE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE PAYMENTS OF ALIMONY SUPPORT OR WAGE LAW CLAIMS, OR BONDS FOR CRIMINAL APPEARANCE. Inter-office Comm unication To / l it From v °' � c Subject affe, ag /71/- Form 327 -C.R. OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Dote / / 19 7 o/ E.11420 Grace . • Spokane, Wash. 99206 Sept: 20, 1979 Office .of • Spokane County. Engineer ' N.. 811 jeffersoni-: "; 4 1 . •'• Spokane, Washih&eo'n 99260, :•:•• Gentlemen: Thanking you for anytning you can do about the.problem, I am . . . . , . . . . . . , - • . Sincerely, . . . . 7/%/74///Lezt i ga iracres Replat No. 3. •J. E. Winner RECEIVED.' pun cotton ENCIREEt SEP2 11979 It .has been si..igge'ed St tilat r w re a mattei":that has disturbing ankles. • • • Many, many monthA: ago I filed for a plat change in order that I might be able to?keep abreast of the escalating cost of living. One of the requirements to securing final approval was paving and . ... 'curbing of the area, 'glitch has been concluded. , • • . • „ . , , However, in'the survey stakes put in by Simpson Engineers . . • . (my,surveyor) Were buried' in the Closing (smoothing) ou of•the groung following curbing and paving.. Simpson does not feel that they should have to resurvey to restore the markers. One of the engineers in your-office suggested that this was the fault of ..%• the excavator; T take.exception to this suppositionU One of-the potential 'buyers noted, and mentioned, the care with which the excavator mane'uvered An order toaiss the markers. -,, .. • • • • , • , • • . I' found one stake which had been buried by the scraper, in the ,Area where the aetal marker should have been. ..I was trying to ,•• determine a fence line, so was not too concerned, believing the €arkers would be intact: They might be, but they appear ,tolhave been, as were the wooden markers, pulled up by,the scrapers, or buried in the process of smoothing the ground. , . . ...,.. • . . • • Can your office use its considerable influence with :the paving company, to trrand convince-them that they shauld•replace the markers? The only marker left in place and 'Visible is the one on the extreme Westerly portion of the tract, protected by the gence line dividing the properties. CHARLES U. ANDERSON VICE PRESIDENT AND COUNTY M Refer To: C- 133352 Simpson Engineers, Inc. • North 909 Argonne Spokane, Washington 99206 A TICOR COMPANY ' Pioneer National Title Insurance Company WEST 521 FIRST AVENUE • SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99210 • TELEPHONE (509) 938 -5281 Report for Plat Certificate This is a report for plat certificate as of May 8, 1979 at 8 covering the following property: Lots 58, 59, 60, 61 and 62, Fairacres., according to plat recorded "K" of Plats, 'page 16, in Spokane County, Washington, E(GEPT the North 145 in the North half'of Section 9, Township Range 44 East, W.M. Record Title is vested in Heirs of Annabel J. Winner, deceased. SUBJECT TO: Probate, proceedings are being had upon the estate of the decedent. Upon entry of order of solvency, including nonintervention powers, the personal representative will be authorized to administer and. settle decedent's estate without intervention of the court. Execution of any instrument should be as, personal representative. Decedeht: : Annabel J. Winner Date:of Lath : October 30, 1977 County /Case'No. : Spokane /79400262 -5 Personal Representative: .James E. Winner. Attorney' : Larry Winner 2. For easements, restrictions and other exceptions, see,Schedule "B -1" attached. continued RE: Fairacres CC: County Planning Commission CC: James Winner :00 A.M., in Volume 25 North, fi Plat Certificate C 1 33352 Page 2 NOTES: 1. General taxes for 1979, in the sum of $225.69, are paid in full. (Assessor's Parcel No. 09542 -0758) This report shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the certificate applied for. RCP /dc PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE. COMPANY Spokane County Office zed Sighat.o iY1HAUHLS "SCHEDULE Eta" 1. An easement for pipe line for the pur of carrying water for irrigation and dorrvstic uses' upon a strip of land. 10 feet in width lying on the South end of said tracts, with the right to go upon the land adjacent thereto for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, operating and reconstructing said pipe line, as granted by John A. Narup and Matilda G. Narup, his wife, to Spokane Valley Irrigation District by deed dated April 19, 1923, recorded in Vol. 406 of Reds, Page 219. 0 0 0 , - 4 145.00 1 " • ; N 00° 08 E .. ..., • . , co 0 ''''IL t*.:,- .-, . v- re- r. Oty . • b .. fri c* . • : . NOO° 08'11“ E „ co v. * ' t . .:' a) Ey . . o 6/4 .: t r......: .: ..._..., N 00° 08 11 E ,--,•‘ . ., _._.„ ,..5^ ...,.. C O , ‘' " .: , • •• • • :11-4'• •0 a . .. i • ! • 4 - -h.:,:„ • _ . - •, T I , : 0 '',!, ; 114 5.00' 4 .4.' 4 ! . , . N 00°08'11 I,, E l' ' 1 1...,1,,,y;;F:X. ',".." i "1 :, • • • ; CO '1`\ 0 fe,c r ': • 'e ' C, t : ; :9 tr ,' 0 , :';i''' - ' . ...;" .. ..-;''`, :,', .' '- - 0 1 ' • .:; ..-, ' s' '' : ' - NOO° 08 11' E . ,-. . , _ ',. ' ,.. , z , 6 , :. 4 , ,', .•::-•-• : , , . -.' ',' , g 0_ . ,,,,:,',,, - ., , , „ : 145.00' -: 0 [ N00°08 11 E --I • i ' ' '.: ; :,-.!. Go t , N .. ] I .1 \ II i ll. 'f.' , I. • ■ ''' a. Cr) /J 0 ..;,■.. 0 . • . ; V".. ',.. 5.12 1 4 ' f • • •.• t !.• • • • . • ',.• , • • • • , • . • •••,..: •,•••• • • e •••• ) i ; „ j; •.' 4' • L et , • , .■ I.. • - -- -,•:— — • „;:: 4 '4 1 : 1 . 1r iTt%. • • • , Vt. ■••• 1 • ' " , 4;14 I Plat Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of March 29, 1979 4. PW- 1156 -77, Airport Village - Lucas ZW- 194 -77 , Agricultural to Restricted Industrial Location: Section 30, Township 25N, Range 42 E.W.M. Proposal: 207.66 acres into 28 lots for industrial uses Action: Time Extension approved - Unanimously Additional Condition: - That the sponsor comply with County paving policy • requirements 5. PS- 1166 -77, Schultz Addition - Schultz ZS- 208 -77, Agricultural Suburban to Single-Family & Two - Family Residential Location: Section 4, Township 24N, Range 43 E.W.M. Proposal: 2.6 acres into 7 lots for single family dwellings b duplexes Action: Time Extension approved - Unanimously Additional Conditions - That the sponsor comply with County paving policy requirements - that a 10 ft. easement be shown on final plat for repair & maintenance of public water line extending from 57th Avenue to abutting north side property' - that temporary use of individual on -site sewage system on each lot be authorized until an area -wide operating sewerage system is available - that owners will not oppose participation in a Utility Local Improvement District (ULID) for a public sewer. PE- 1177 -7$ Fairacres Replat #3 - Winner ZE -22 -78 A•ricultural to Sin.le -Famil Residential Location: Section 9, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M. Proposal: 2.14 acres into 7 lots for single family dwellings Action: Time Extension approved - Unanimously Additional Condition - That the sponsor comply with County paving policy requirements. 7. PN- 1282 -78, Glenpark Addition - Aspaas ZN- 31 -79, Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban Location: Proposal: Action: Reasons: Proposal is located in the northern portion of Spokane County, NE of intersection of Antler & Division Roads 79.08 acres into 20 lots for single - family dwellings Denial - 1 to 2 - this proposal infringes upon a chicken farm and other agricultural uses - that the present proposal appears to be approaching spot zoning and is incompatible 8. PN- 1284 -79, Gleneden 5th Addition - Becker $ Provincial Properties, Inc. zN- 33 -79, Agricultural to Single-Family & Two - Family Residential Location: Proposal is located in the northern portion of Spokane County east of and adjacent to PSH #3, 5 of Glencrest Drive and N of Elto Avenue Proposal: 29.41 acres into 66 lots for single- family dwellings & duplexes Action: Approval - Unanimously Additional Condition: - That Lot #s 54, 55, 56 and 57 be for single family use s SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER PE- 1177 -78 ZE-22 -78 A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on March 29, 1979, and the members of the Committee present being Abby Byrne, Chairperson, John Culler; and Kenneth Kennedy. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, James E. Winner, is requesting approval of an Extension of Time and Zone Change, PE- 1177 -78, Fairacres Replat #3 and ZE- 22-78, Agricultural to Single Family Residential for subdivision of 2.14 acres into 7 lots for single family dwellings and there being present, the following applicant or represen- tatives: JAMES E. WINNER C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential and vacant. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as residential. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is agricultural. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 1 6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 7. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 8. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use is not detrimental to the general purpose or otherwise harmfull to the public health, safety, and welfare. 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapproval of the proposed use. 10. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) That the sponsor has made reasonable progress towards completion of the project and the Time Extension should be approved.. b) That the sponsor shall comply with the County paving policy. D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTIGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS SUBDIVISION APPROVAL: NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated separately and listed hereafter. 1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record. 2. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting a time extension to review any preliminary plat approval. 3. That a time extension be granted to April 1, 1980. 4. That the sponsor comply with the County paving policy requirements. 2 ..o. PE- 1177-78 ZE -22 -78 E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of James E. Winner for an Extension of Time, Fairacres Replat #3 and a Zone Change from Agricultural to Single Family Residential as described in the application should be approved. Motion by: Culler Seconded by: Kennedy Vote: Unanimous By: ATTEST: FRED L. DAYHARSH Planning Director 3 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE File No. PE- 1177-78 ZE -22-78 L t hairman Thursday, March 29, 1 979 PE- 1177 -78, Fairacres.Replat = This propositios has been on file for a long time, especially for me - -on a fixed income -- against the skyrocketing cost of living.Over the last couple of years we have discussed many phases, pro and con, of the plat and the reason for the orig- inal proposal that it be platted. The compelling proposal to plat was to try to reinforce my income in order to live without going on welfare. Approval of the plat plan has been drawn out so long that I have had to borrow from life insurance policies. I cannot borrow any further. If this plat cannot be approved at this hearing, cir- cumstances compel me to ask that the application be cancelled and the land be returned to its original status -- agricultural. This will permit me to sell the entire property and move to G.regon, where my daughter had the misfortune to lose her home by fire. I would also ask that the !350.00 check written Jan. 5 • to pay the County building some fence be returned, and would ask that the ri30:00 demanded for the extension of time to this hearing be returned. !Wt.. Eads of the Engineer's 0rfice, on Jan. 5 informed me that right of access had been secured. The County insisted it build the fence.) Early last year I waded through the snow to. Mr. Quinn's house, at the suggestion of Mr. Eads. Mr. Quinn told,me to go ahead and use what I needed of his property for a driveway (access.) This was reported to Simpson Ebgineers Nov. 21, 1978. No one seemed to believe me, or Mr. Eads. Again on Jan. 5 Mr. Eads told me that access had been secured. If Mr. Eads cannot be believed, it would be my suggestion that he be replaced by someone whose word can be trusted. It seems Mr. Eads, Mr. •uinn, and myself, are all prone to distort the truth. . . ._ "kit ��•4.} R V • 1 s I have rec3lved offers for building lots on the tract indicated but buyers want to figure on all eight lots, not lust the seven as shown. In view of the circumstances, it is requested that all .eight be included. The Engineer's Office has indicated that paving and curbing of the westerly 130 feet will have to be borne by the developer or owner solely. RIGHT OF WAY DNF.11 EADS FORM 1 -AUDITOR to BUCKEYE AVFSIUE FILE NO. Ernest Quimi, Spokane County RECEIVED FOR RECORD, this date, the above instrument, numbered in order of reception. VERNON W. 0111.AND Comity Auditor Spokane County, Washington 6 C: RIGHT OF WAY DEED 196'7 Buckeye Gvenue • No . ............................... IN THE MATTER of the 'i.ne t Si':}. ............ KNOW AL1, MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That.........:.' ......: of the County of Spokane. ..... .L.:.IA�•...li G..1 ?i: Cl r7::.`t�i.` an in the State of Washington, in consideration of the benefits and other valuable coonsider do n of t he sum of ................One and no 100 ...- : ..- ...- ...- ...- ...-.. -... ...-...- ..Dollars, paid y the bees the e nts dt `r ant bar ain, s e l and convey g unto said Spokane County, the following described parcel land. presents do g situated in Spokane County, in the State of Washington, to - wit: � North 30 feet of the 'est 1-:_) of tl:e 130 ;6 feet of the ,iortheast Quarter (� i;outhea:;t Quarter (: =s) of t• „e ?oi rn.;e ;t Quarter (iii'_). in Spokane County. Washington. ;x- )1; f,. '1`. 1. CIrP spy ^rtr , — E 19 77 F,. r;,.; dJ Yl )f Ian. CP 655 '130 t,Oti 2 5 North, Range 44 E.W.M. of Section Township ............... TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same, unto the said Spokane County for the purposes of a public road forever. ] th whereof .......................have hereunto set m2 /r hand.... and seal.... this 1 In witness J i.anunry 19 79 d ay of ............................: ,/ e u .,,,...„,„ (Seal) 45,1_30 (Seal) (NOTE.: It married, must be signed by both husband end wife.) v� {. 4Jt) IxcE JJ� STATE OF WASHINGTON, J } Se. County of Spokane. On this 15th day of January ...,...... A. D. 19 before me personal) appeared DDeared personally known to me to be the individual(s) we4 who } executed the foregoing Instrument and acknowledged the said Instrument to be the tree and voluntary act and deed of said indlviduel @) for the „-eutberise4- te-essaa Lla le. .\ xi`H is)nor t G;ainn use* and purposes herein mentioned, and-on oath - each - stated - that. -in4ru sent -sad- that - seal- affzed-le -tha.. t} +'. ',i''• In Wilneee Whereof I have hereunto set my hand and afilred ,my oMelal sal the day and year first above ItleIr.i •,'r' &---‘40 gay akrettee- @t*3aec -j ~ - Notai7 In and for the State of Washington. ,, •:;Ofgg(c"� residing at Snot, me, '•da hi.ngton r: + (Seal) FILED OR RECORDED RE IJEsT pi. County Engit JUN 0 5 ooN'99 VFRiiii' +0111 AND+AUDIIOR SI'OrtANE CUUHTY,WASH. DEP )101fe Reg Court House xxx eeIr N V 21 0 o 0 0 0 V 4A) F, +,I:E 562 IN. THE PATTER OF Buckeye Road ITo. 1967 , Spokane County, Washington. This agreement made and entered into this 5th day of January 1979, between (Grantee) Spokane County, Washington, and (Grantor) Mr James E. . Winner, E11420 Grace Avenue Spokane, Washington. The Grantor proposes to subdivide certain lands he ohms, to be known as Fairacres Replat No. 3. In connection with the proposed plat, as c submitted, it is necessary for Spokane County to secure additional right of way for the extension of Buckeye Avenue. For and in consideration of Spokane County securing the additional right of way the Grantor hereby agrees to deliver to Spokane County, a check in the amount of S 350.00 for installation of fencing, consisting of Steel T —Post and three (3) strands of barbed —wire, along the County right of way described as beginning at a point 30 feet North of the Northwest corner of the West 130.66 feet of the Northeast Quarter (NE of the Southeast Quarter (SFr-) of the Northwest Quarter (Pflf ); thence South a distant 30 feet to said Northwest corner; thence East along the North line of said West 130.66 feet to the East line thereof. The matter of improving Buckeye Avenue is not a part of this agreement. IN WITNESS viTHEREOF I have hereunto,set my hand this 5th day of January 1979. eer STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SP0K.JIE ) ss AGREEMENT i date / 1979. 2 -atup-a, (Grantor) On this day personally appeared before me James N. Winner, known to me to be the individual described herein who executed the within and foregoing instru— ment and acknowledep that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mention. Given under my hand and seal this 5th day of January _7.975. y Fub7.ic nd for the Stata of :. ashington i'cs.iding at Spokane. U shington. Project Designation: Negotiator: J Record Owner: -JA C Address Tax Payer: Address : Address : Uthor Interest: Location on Project: PRFJ IMINAhY NEGOTIATIR1,fPORT Data Assigned: L5ec 7 N ;, Jc c -, i \ u c_ Special Considerations offered: i i (i•‘.? — /1,i h ,U2 0.,t_ of .; A. 0 0114— is i ^ la (44Ctt_4� ) /ll _ CPL_) 1n , at -1 , . . r..- -t _ I Remarks (Dated): 2 FNinf t sr, 1 s{, .-4 oti. : AT 10 .ale of Final Offer Letter lecomnended for Condemnation To Office Engineer 'igpporting Documents: Appraisal Report Copy Final Letter Owners Answer Settlement: Date by Monetary Consideration Offered Monetary Consideration Offered Monetary Consideration Offered Monetary Consideration Offered C ;k Contact Appraiser Appraiser Amount o ? t e ai Title To County Engineer Date Negotiation History Title Report Others (List) N0 ./ C.7 Parcel No - Consideration Asked Date Consideration Asked Date Consideration Asked Date Consideration Asked Date • I 41 1 ■ • An (1- / 0 -1 '4'44 /1 t a- e- • 1 • /1.-ttt i a .-- el 1, t T G 0' t .462 . t e r. -Lt c s t L.t 4 • E LG1a. c (. 01 n *.( Jai „Zit" . 4_,A; r . 4- Z-7 4.1 n. � f / tt.:) -4-a / /> (1 . C x; 4.Q, _ 14 By Amount Right of Entry Date Appraised Date Appraised Amount Used Amount Used To Prosecutors Office How Inter-office Communication t T r .--;•—• • r. From 4 t :-/ Subject Cs-) 1/4-7:3 L 0 Ar. f• ••• (L rt• ,LL), $_) 14 . ) C.:- Form 327-C.R. OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER . - e 0 ) 1. i? 1. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 7- ••••• •iL "": Date C- tc. A) ( • • z .:5 // if)lita-dies- 11-3 (4/ 714-/ rt./ fr7" (eta • f t Le t. & iac-Z:44; tz 5":\ , 19 2 IAJO) Ei 12 /L. T. ; :c4 Cr j 4 . 1 CE' :4 it ite) Cr- k:..90 'OZ/ Pc* I6: c , , b 3 , / r 'P 4 4) 6 6; L "A 1 70 06 t . ti N N /2 /3 /4 €,. e © ! I6: 1 'Gii ns/r ucted MS' L / M ITS OF 7n . .,. • - { IZ, /ZZ% Frontage . ..775:7,8%7Area t .ri 1 1 .(..410/1,c / ;tors , 1/4, Area : Ott; ite ) Frontage ;:;:: • • {--- .--;- ' -- Cl$1% Z - Area ‘e4 G3.0 frontage 1 . :7- G__'-. 1 16 15 17) E4- 7 _ TO au • 1 s . : I Et k, 1 1 T _ i,. }� II`r�� , c A9 _ 4 i QL.`/4T o o ur S u l.E ' ' L ?'�' 9 9 ®A NAME 2 o � � , ,C 79 y ki Lig A ' " t S y:e.0 ?Ia . . . g I :1 � or't". i / /J PL �►T ', .IMAGE • _ _ !►,T LVOV, Ct s sm. coo KO'%O PLIS1t1 P RsPIL4 F1N$L `. DIZ WI o out DRoi∎tkk Et�61MEER 1 PEcrto4 5 5-'�4 P,/ PER, I I s s" ®IMP 140:3141) , ,; 7 7 r r ,v ,� AIi1 kce , ,,,,-/7 ) COOKtty EWC %S l l e 0-11'77 Pt. AT To , _ M OA u MeKT 1 1 N ) 19 ) ) ,J FIA1D114■65 4 O tDEK er.......ec t) State *nest a -boor (iu e � j$ck Abu eeds -far be de tete 3) M eat vtt1At'►.. m4 Eerie w,e..ts iti DeAtce& tic +^\ Orr M, 92-4 -/322 1 S /le no A/ FA t2ACIt 5 (QE PLAT * 3 I // 77 ValteMINSINNIESSIMENN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that James E. Winner, a single man, has caused to be platted into lots, blocks and streets the land shown hereon as "FAIRACRES' REPLAT NO 3" and described as follows: Lots 58, 59, 60, 61 and 62,- Fairacres., according to plat recorded In Volume "K' of Plats, page 1 Spokane County, Washington, EXCEPT the North 1 thereof. Located in the North half of Section 9, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M. No more than one detached dwelling structure shall be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purpose of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. Each lot is authorized the use of an individual on -site sewage system. - A public water system as approved by County and State Health Authorities, the iota' fire district, and the water supplier (purveyor) will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. Use of private :wells and water systems is prohibited. 1,ot 9, Bloc:: 1, as shown hereon, is dedicated to Spokane County to be deeded for r oa,] `purposes forever at such time as adjacent - property is platted. The.plattor' does hereby dedicate forever the streets shown hereon for public r7a(a purposes. After 8 building permits have been issued for this plat no agricultural livestock shall be kept within this plat. The platter does hereby dedicate to the public the temporary Cul -de -sac easement,, as shown hereon, over and across Lots 1 and 2 Block 1. These temporary Cul -de -sac easements are granted for road purposes until such time as the road is continued as a. full width right of way, at which time they will be vacated, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto `s et my hand and affixed my seal this STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUN'T'Y OF SPOKANE 77 y comr.ission expires b/ ; 81 DEDICATION , James E. Winner ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ENGINEER 0 CERTIFICATE COUNTY OFFICIALS S F day of Oc c) `'sir On this 1 'T` day of , 1979, before me personally appeared James E. Winner, a single man, who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes herein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my handy and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at Spoko r;n , Washington I, Clarence E. Simpson, a licensed Civil Engineer and Land Surveyor, hereby certify that this plat represents a true copy of the official record and survey made by me, and that the lot corners and monuments have been set. �.....,•S- .°;, -f ✓T %' •tea:.:' ...... },-� 'i� " .rj,,.... • ) Clarence E. Simps'on Professional Engineer arrd' Land Surveyor Examined and approved this ; C day of I- 1979 L { fir Spokane County Planning Department DirectOr examined' and appro7ed this , of ' . ,,' ,,' � � , 97y e Spokane ounty Commissioners Chairman Exarr;ined and approved this w day of RM , 1979 Spokane County Health District Health Officer 1.979. 'ems FOUND R.R. SPIKE AS PER FAIRACRES REPLAT NO.1 - - 'STRIP LOT 9 BLOCK FOUND R R SPIKE AS PER FAIRACRES REPLAT NO.i to 80. 31' O 0 O 1�r.y) u, I V 80.00' 4- I hereby certify that the required taxes on the herein platted land have been paid this day o +' ` , 1979 By Spokane County Treasurer Deputy - Examined and approved this w... day of • r- _. .. PP Y � 979 a ,.. �- � `: � y'r,.; ;: By ��; .,.. , ,' ; .. . , �� � MON. '81 CORNERS FOUND (AS NOTED) Spokane County Assessor Deputy o CORNERS SET 1/2 REBAR CAP NO 706 Q SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD MONUMENT ----d SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY Examined and approved this day of , 1979 Spokane County Engineer Examined and approved this day of .. 1879 , Spokane County Utilities Director Io UTILITY 4T 0 O 0 2 1 1 r 80.00 -- i 1 { 0 0 TEMPOARY CUL -DE -SAC \� 80.00' 10 W O 0 0 O 2 N 89 °3900" E — 2655.08'- 80.00' 80.00' O N —30800— 248,2.6 -- BLOCK 1 I- -�+ t - i - ' F_ 1 1 \ , ' 4 , • _ • i . _ _ ` to o S89°39 00 W M FAIRACiRES REPLAT NO.f S89 °39'00 11 W 643.96 AMENDED P L A T GRACE AVENUE BLOCK 1 80.00' 80.00' 80.00' j 3 BLOCK ' La 1 I 1 0 — 0 1 © 0 1 to {ri 1 4 T'j e t The Bearing of North for Bowdish Road, per Mirabeau "Ranch Addition, was used as the basis of bearing for this map, { 80.00' JACKSON AVENUE - — { 30' 30' N 89°41'26" E — — 2657.74'-- SCALE JULY 1979 r— — 0 80.00' 1 BUCKEY , -- AVENUE 80 14 13 - -- 356.00 BLOCK 0 0 Nl SUNNY VALLEY ACRES 0 0 O 2 80.00 { ) 1 I 7 1 80.00' IC` UTILITY EASEMENT 78.65' 20 25' FINAL PLAT FARACRES REPLAT N0. 3 A REPLAT IN A PORTION OF LOTS 58 , 59 60, 61 AND 62 FAIRACRES NW 1/4 OF SECTION 9, T. 25 N. R. 44 E.W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 30 O N FOUND 'R.R. SPIKE AS PER FAIRACRES REPLAT NO.I BUCKEYE AVE. 0 h7 0 _ - 0 2 ec ',, ",r • 0 4 : - • 2 5 9.12 41t, z o ' I 1 ! i 1 at 30 20' SCALE GI 1 t — - - .olosto,. 1 O' \ r•t ' ''t' . ,ri L,e_� ✓tom {'‘ ' , L)l �ii� / 1 1 , FOUND BRASS MONUMENT , AS PER FAIRACRES REPLAT NO CLARENCE E. I ENGINEERS, INC WASHINGTON SPOKANE, DATE DESc Ai' /P /QN 6— /5- 7Z TH /f. SECTION REPRODUCED FROM L /NEN TO A G. Pay — I � M Q 9 4 's07— I ,i, NE h_7 — I � M Q 9 IONE MI 0 I ,i, NE k. 4 A4 /5S/0 4 0° / 0 O 0 uc•, :'- /v0. 2/90 Sa SCd1:14,! zz1., 222.6 e� 142.7 • 38 37 GRACE N89 ° 3t'E MONTGOMERY DR. - C.R.P. /389 HRVtE 6 , e-1 cc? ui 4. rn JACR SON i 2c) AV t. — by ilo. /15 91 O L2a' Not Conslry ;led 104 - 105 01 "° - - J 224.7 No. 1404 /2 // /o , 9 e 7 6 s .y 3 AVE. - ( NS )96 7 — V i I 0 / /2 /3 /1 / 6 /7 /P F' I - • VIE i k. �; R / n � 4,1* ,m ILI 4T 1L0 G, , -1 <RY F D ✓e ! 7r /4 /5 0 ' 1\189°34:E 596.5 . s •. — r 33+7 4 � • — ; 34-- .3 ; 4 - 1l �Cbr. Marktzd Ftdlck p r 3 ro �- _ n3S 34.. 3 7 38 X39 4a 41 r,. W 12 W �`v in w „J N ,.,• 3,,.0 ton .OJ r N 4 Zt IZ 209 `_/ zlq. 132 � :, '� /�/ ,37. - - -J83- ♦`' L211 3 ,a8a „1 .1 �. �_N 1 Y L u / 20 21 22 23 46 ° 45 44 b. 43 s +53.6 MONTGOMERY D 0 0 0 0 0 K P40X— A/o./735 -60' 8 8 to 5 0 1 Ol O 4 MISSION 5 5 W 0. SEC9 T25N.R 44E Scala 1 -400' �� n : 0 /VO TE : ® S/- HAD7ED AREA DES /Gt'.JATES " VA cAT /0Ai OFFICIAL PLAT 77? Count En3ine4r CHOOL4 AVENUE 16� ENG 1 ithseks 9 z 0 0 R JAN 1- 6 1978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT i 06 +20.3 A. V=:!— Sec, Car. / n R. -I-. 10 zd 1++93.1 p T. C. 3° R. +. .2t 8° S7 ' L. 2 98.3' ' • L , :4, Cor, {�eo/ -s N..69 ° ° O2 'Y ' � 0 7 . 0 f f . , , 4, /- ?s zf �= c� pr C.5° _ 0 'MA' NSF/ eL "3s /66 5 NA :v • , P. 0T 'cE: \:��2o,ww 4k : ::::::::::::: ..._ .:ice` 3r2p.3 'AR Sec. Con N7 /SSlOn/ 0 0°09s Lt. 15 . UNIVERSITY OFF ET CU E -® 1.11 1 Z r N _ \ _ 2 2c) ui ILI L � . f f u 7 FULL CUL-0E- ELfO :rcov�cdu. rti0 7 — —• °• c. CU L ••11. TE Y CUL Y� 1(.. )PE r.T_T - , - L I\JE= 1.)lL7r a Ur 2 Tc) \VA t`1 o c }.., CU 2. "rw \' r_1 -r -. c F- I; tF�6.r - P - .' W E C ;U (.2 P.5 Tom? :L.) r "4 tv 2T rJ :..f_' i :; I r,lt c :01. --1ALL. rSE td °Ir ice. J 1">.2'r 7; -4E:. COL) N 1 2 Fr Fi C ti=' F012 TLI i ry ` r - �3 -��• w I ! i � 1 .+ l�' fv t=_.. `.J r� 0 , :.-^7 LJ 1�l 1,.... �:.. � r;'7 t.911-4 4:.. ��� W1 ;OE CUL OFFICE OF COLit -rrs ( Br --1Q1 EE:C cor00 t ,,e1,1 4 CC.SUN - Pro c'Jt C?tvL JE Er:OW 0 E E.T E.. T 2E r2 I G --i , c, 4 Y` CUrJ 5 L_iN E, (L, r ;_- lA%.f.._T '' C ) ?, t.2 i L CIst". TA Ni ),t:, r2 F :l r " "1 ! E 12 4t a i _ I t- G r_Dr2A,l+-4 $GE E N__i:r "r