The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1504-85u i t 85 1143 FILE, BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RECEIVED • IJ AN 10 1986 Ammo) ' HA ENGINEEk' 't5b`I"R C E `0 F PUBLIC HEARING IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER - ZE- 180 -78, RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL AND AGRICULTURAL TO COMMUNITY BUSINESS (B -2), INDUSTRIAL PARK (I -1), REGIONAL BUSINESS (B -3) and GENERAL AGRICULTURAL SPONSOR: HANSON PROPERTIES, INC. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Tom P. May, Attoney for Rogers, Miller, Morgan and Crossman, has filed a Notice of Appeal of approval by the Hearing Examiner Committee of the above captioned preliminary subdivision and zone reclassification. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Board of County Commi-s, (one s of Spokane County, Washington, will conduct a public hearing o1 TUESDAY 27, 1986 the Sp at 9:00 A.M. on said day, in the Assembly Room of ok ne County Court- house. West 1116 Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260 -0100, to consider Preliminary Subdivision PE- 1504 -85, Sullivan Park Center and Zone Reclassifi- cation ZE- 180 -78, Restricted Industrial and Agricultural to Community Business (B -2) on Lots 1 thru 15, 19, & 20, to Industrial Park (1-1) on Lots 21 thru 36, Regional Business (B -3) on Lots 16 thru 18 and General Agricultural on Tracts A thru F on property generally located as follows: Sullivan Park center will be north of Interstate 90 on either side of the Sullivan Road interchange. The site southeast of the Spokane River occupies portions of Sections 10, 11, 12, 13, & 14, Township 25N., Range 44 E.W.M, Spokane County, WA NOTICE I5 FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be any environmental documents prepared in conjunction with the proposal. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony verbally or in writing in support of or in opposition to this application for preliminary subdivision' and zone reclassifications. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 24 day of December, 1985. PUBLISH: SPOKANE VALLEY HERALD DECEMBER 30, 1985 (MAP) WILLIAM E. DONAHUE CLERK OF THE BOARD � :�' 4- ii � 7 t (1 ROSANNE MONTAGUE, DE'UTY d di Hi imtieR o r Lars 5-4.1.-. n r- n.. /l ( N 1 (- r L ) " ' r 4- Pi_A ChiecK Fe / + r` � /7.0 , t SIC A/0,* ref %P,fo w O lL. s Alta C !L FJ LeoeND 43,4593 of Sc 4et yy s O k Pz-.¢r L0€1vn0N,r4)- /. 0 K- ar - noia 5,6 'aa Sty 0 / N,a, ,su ( fo.ac Nn.,nrs 0 K- 6 K go .ao w,. orf 4o-rn<@rvr 4 - Lor f /e, .a Afttliffer 0 f /cu PEDIC41r a , 0 K_ / ice. r -ST - Actor } �O N Gt a° iC 0 K 3 /e,°4 ,0 ,.• KLo r v6 (r L o r Ate -4-s !_ RP-A,r,f /�4,r,< )) /JO ex- Q e F' 0-0 5 v te E DFSL.R tPr!oe -I mK /,cor,Y- 3 OX �P,oKo ad O R 10 - f$ P S nett EAn nir /V or)/ Q.30 /Ar �c c Pier Ma ire!) 'f b - e-- . Rf 4J PED (CST / n iq O'', DA" Eel, A./,44 LAAnAttAr. aul-- , �' y�7 � AjGG � � 0 �k� -,. FLa °D hhilgr) Pic),,,47' £r,Mn Doc. Ft y _! p_A ... �v Pe to Are' ea "D 14/4"Afin,c, A `�` Cl) nt rR :12f37 QESca2lP O Wn(ERStEtPS -1 C / . Ro.4 D P • AJ ez<-__ N e j) B O N D A 1.9_ -6c. os 4 a( R6. a Mites (41€w /_ / 44.4.` Tr �+L 4' A /32 '!;'/� 4G K4 owLED 6 eMeNTs SienAiED Sy ,EN6)UEEet. o ^ tie '� 34S-1.0 1eN�` �,�y 96A -q Page 1 TO: FROM: DATE: PROJECT: FILE #: OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 (509)477 -3600 Fax (509)477 -2243 Review Date: Planner: Sponsor /Applicant: Section Township Range: Hearing Date: Technical Review Date: CC: Applicant ROBERT BOYLE Engineer /Surveyor Planner TAMMY JONES "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" EXTENSION OF TIME Spokane County Planning n 2l / Division of Engineering & Roads oads t lltirN,-t/' May 18, 2001 SULLIVAN PARK CENTER PE- 1504 -85 05/18/2001 TAMMY JONES ROBERT BOYLE 10/11/14-25-44 () ( @) The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order /Decision" should the request be approved. 1. The County Engineer has no objection to an extension of time being granted for the proposal. In addition to the existing Conditions of Approval, the following conditions are submitted to the record. 2. This proposed subdivision or development proposal is located within a drainage basin which has been identified by the Spokane County Engineer's and Utilities offices as having stormwater runoff problems. Since this proposed subdivision or development proposal is affected by or is a contributor to stormwater flows, property owners should participate in the planning and implementation of a future basin wide stormwater management system. The following statement shall be placed in the plat dedication: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to join in any County- approved stormwater management program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fixed through public hearings for service or benefit obtained by the planning, design, constructing, maintaining or operation of stormwater control facilities." 3. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final, road and drainage plans, a drainage report and road and drainage calculations that conform to the April 3, 2001 edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction and the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management and the revised conditions of approval. Final road and drainage plans shall also comply with all applicable state and federal laws that may be applicable to this project. Final road and Page 2 1509 END drainage plans, related calculations and a drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a construction or building permit or approval of the final plat. Following plan acceptance by the Spokane County Engineer, drainage language will be drafted by Spokane County and provided to the Sponsor's Engineer or Surveyor for inclusion with the final plat document. 4. The Spokane County Engineer has reviewed the extension of time and will require that the proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 1 -0298, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 5. "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities." "The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work." Kimball, Sandy From: Hemmings, Bill Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 1:35 PM To: Jones, Tammy Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Kimball, Sandy; Parry, Ed; Sims, Brenda; Baldwin, Greg; Hohman, John; Little, Colleen Subject: PE- 1504 -85 - Bob Boyle - Request for Time Extension 5 -17 -01 If a time extension is granted I recommend the following conditions of approval: • This proposed subdivision or development proposal is located within a drainage basin which has been identified by the Spokane County Engineer's and Utilities offices as having stormwater runoff problems. Since this proposed subdivision or development proposal is affected by or is a contributor to stormwater flows, property owners should participate in the planning and implementation of a future basin wide stormwater management system. The following statement shall be placed in the plat dedication: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to join in any County- approved stormwater management program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fixed through public hearings for service or benefit obtained by the planning, design, constructing, maintaining or operation of stormwater control facilities." • A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and drainage plans, a drainage report and road and drainage calculations that conform to the April 3, 2001 edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction and the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management and the revised conditions of approval. Final road and drainage plans shall also comply with all applicable state and federal laws that may be applicable to this project. Final road and drainage plans, related calculations and a drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a construction or building permit or approval of the final plat. Following plan acceptance by the Spokane County Engineer, drainage language will be drafted by Spokane County and provided to the Sponsor's Engineer or Surveyor for inclusion with the final plat document. Bill Hemmings, PE 1 ftv 411-11 tra-1 DIVISION OF PLANNING MICHAEL V. NEEDHAM, DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Extension of Time for PE- 1504 -85 Enclosure MEMORANDUM 1026 W. BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220 PHONE: (509) 477 -7200 • FAX: (509) 477 -2243 • TDD: (509) 477 -7133 A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GARY OBERG, DIRECTOR TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads; Scott Englehard (c/o- -Sandy Klmba117 Spokane Division of Engineering - Development Services; Bill Hemmings Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement; Jeff Forry Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 Consolidated Irrigation District FROM: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner 1,� DATE: May 4, 2001 The Spokane County Division of Planning has received the attached request for an Extension of Time for the preliminary plat of Hanson Center-East, PE- 1504 -85. Please review and forward your comments to me by 18,2001. If you have any questions, please contact me at 477 - 7225. ` -- - - Copy w/o enclosures to: Robert J. Boyle, 15102 E. Indiana Ave., Spokane, WA 99216 CLC Associates, 707 W. 7th Ave., Suite 200, Spokane, WA 99204 RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING NAME OF PLAT/FILE NO: Hanson Center East PARCEL NO. 45123.9013, 45131.0110, 45131.9021, 45135.9031, 45132.9073, APPLICANT (NAME OF LEGAL OWNER): 45132.9074 Hanson Industries, Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 15102 East Indiana Avenue CITY: Spokane STATE: WA ZIP: 99216 PHONE: (work) 922 -5252 (home) (fax) 922 -5757 IF APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR THE BELOW OWNER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE OWNER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT: Robert J. Boyle MAILING ADDRESS: 15102 East Indiana Avenue CITY: Spokane STATE: WA ZIP: 99216 PHONE: (work) 922 -5252 (home) (fax) 922 -5757 I. Has any portion of the plat, short plat or BSP been finalized (recorded)? 2. Has a proposed final plat, short plat or BSP been submitted to the Division of Building and Planning? Yes X No If no, why has the plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized? What has been the delay? 3. What progress has occurred: What conditions of approval have been completed (such as survey work, improvements constructed, departmental approvals obtained)? Sewer, water and street improvement /storm drainage plans have been approved. Sewer, water are in place, curbing and paving is partially complete. Page 1 of 2 Application for Extension of Time 1 Client hoped to have all improvements in place prior to bonding for final plat. Construction has gone slower than anticipated. 4. Why has the plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized? What has delayed finalization? 5. Is this a phased project? Yes X No If yes, please complete the following information: No. of lots originally approved: 28 No. of phases finalized to date: 1 No. of lots remaining to be finalized: 24 No. of acres remaining to date: 59 ± LEGAL OWNER SIGNATURE tilt- (Signature of legal owner or representative as authorized by legal owner) I 10 "Bb yce v\ & , (print name) SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. 1 FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS /HER BEHALF. ADDRESS: / lSIo 7 -- £ ni tint ti ge PHONE: /ZL � CITY: Spo /iX STATE: LAM- ZIP: / p 9 a I 4.30.01 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SPOKANE SKJNATU ss: SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 37 NOTARY SEAL 43/40 NOTARY Zose ni r ��y wPvi ge��y►�� EKE OF'IIME APP/WTC /Rcv. 51700 NOTARY day o 20 0 \ NOTARY SIGNATURE otary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at: Val 0 My appointment expires DATE SUBMITTED: RECEIVED BY: AMOUNT RECEIVED: RECEIPT NO. Page 2 of 2 Application for Extension of Time DATE DIVISION OF PLANNING MICHAEL V. NEEDHAM, DIRECTOR RECEIVED OCT 19 2000 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering; Scott Engelhard, c/o Sandy Kimball Development Engineering Services; Bill Hemmings Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement; Jeff Forry Fire District No. 1 Consolidated Irrigation District FROM: Francine Shaw, Senior Planner DATE: October 19, 2000 SED PREL PE- 1504 -85 SUBJEC . RE MINARY PLAT MAP FOR HANSON CENTER EAST, Attached for your 11 e is a revised Preliminary Plat map for the above- subject project that illustrates the relocation and redesign of those remaining lots not yet finalized. No comments are being requested at this time. If you have any questions or need further information, you can reach me at 477 -7218. WC Attachment: Revised map A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GARY OBERG, DIRECTOR copy w/o attachment: Brock Materne, CLC Associates, 707 W. 7` Ste. 200, Spokane, WA 99204 1026 W. BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220 PHONE: (509) 477 -7200 • FAX: (5091 477 -2247 • TOD: (5091 477 -7133 RECEIVED BEFORE IM Q 6 1998 THE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLA SPOKANE MUNN ENGINEER IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION) FINDINGS OF FACT, OF TIME REQUEST FOR PE- 1504 -85; ) CONCLUSIONS AND SULLIVAN PARK CENTER AN ) DECISION APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT ) THIS MATTER, a request for an Extension of Time from Hanson Industries, Inc. has been received and was decided upon, pursuant to the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance (Section 12.100.118) and RCW 58.17.140, on the 5' day of May, 1998. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by the Spokane County Director of Building and Planning. 2. The proposal was to divide approximately 226 acres into 42 lots for a 79 acre regional shopping center, 19 acres of other commercial use, a 22 acre business park, a 53 acre industrial park, a 300 room hotel and 43 acres of roadway and open space. 3. The subject preliminary plat was approved by Board of County Commissioners on March 25, 1986. 4. The proposal is located north of I -90, on either side of Sullivan Road, south of the Spokane River in Sections 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM Spokane County, Washington. 5. The existing zoning of the property is Community Business (B -2), Regional Business (B- 3), Light Industrial (I -2) and General Agricultural (GA). Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the proposal does conform to the requirements of the existing zones. 6. The Comprehensive Plan designates this are of the preliminary plat as Industrial and the location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. 7. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary plats, short plats, or binding site plans. These criteria are found in Chapter 12.100.118 (Extension of Time) of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this decision. The following is the relevant section of Chapter 12.100.118: "The Director may administratively approve an extension provided there are no significant changed conditions which would render filing of the plat or binding site plan contrary to the public health, safety or general welfare, and further provided one or more of the following circumstances is found to apply." 1) That some portion of the existing preliminary subdivision or binding site plan has been finalized since the project was approved and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval. RESPONSE: Of the 42 lots approved in the original preliminary plat, four (4) have been finalized and are within the final plat of Sullivan Park Center, which was recorded on April 26, 1990. 2) That the preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan remains generally consistent with original plat or binding site plan that was approved, and the sponsor has taken substantial steps toward finalizing the plat or binding site plan, which shall include one, but is not limited to the following: a. surveying the lots within the development; b. arranging for public services to the site; c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan; d. the completion of studies or other requirements which were part of preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan approval. RESPONSE: The remaining portions of the preliminary plat remain consistent with the preliminary plat of record and the applicant has participated in construction of Indiana Avenue within the finalized portion of the preliminary plat and extending westerly towards Pines Road. The applicant has. also improved the Sullivan Road/Indiana Avenue interchange. A portion of the original preliminary plat was aggregated with adjacent properties to the south via Certificate of Exemption (CE- 122- 98 /H -E), and this property is no longer within the preliminary plat of record. . The applicant has participated in various studies to identify infrastructure needs associated with the future Evergreen interchange with I -90. Phase II and subsequent phases of the original preliminary plat cannot be finalized until construction of the new Evergreen/I -90 interchange (and other infrastructure improvements), and the applicant has taken substantial steps towards completing the final plat. 3) That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This provision shall not apply to public utility extensions which the project sponsor would normally fund. RESPONSE: The original preliminary plat includes specific conditions which require extensive infrastructure improvements to the adjoining transportation network and complete funding has not been available to complete the required infrastructure. 4) That administration delays have caused the inability of the applicant to finalize the plat within the five (5) year time period. RESPONSE: The original preliminary plat approval period was for three years and the preliminary plat has received three previous extensions of time. This is the fourth extension of time and the preliminary plat has maintained approval status for approximately 13 years. Administrative delays in design and funding of the future Evergreen/I-90 interchange have caused subsequent delays in finalizing Phase II and Phase III of the original preliminary plat. Extension of Time PE- 1504 -85 2 As specified by Section 12.100.118 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, the Director may grant one three (3) year time extension that may include any additional or altered conditions and requirements recommended by affected agencies. Additional one (1) year time extensions may be granted by the Director beyond the initial three (3) year extension. This Extension of Time request is the first extension request processed under the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance adopted on December 17, 1996 and effective on January 1, 1997. Therefore, a three (3) year extension of time is provided for by the above - referenced section of the Subdivision Ordinance. Subsequent extensions are limited to one (1) year as specified above. 8. Additional updated conditions have been recommended by the Spokane County Division of Utilities - Stormwater Utility. No other agencies provided updated conditions. ' DECISION Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request for PE- 1504 -85 is hereby APPROVED until June 1, 2001. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. All those conditions of approval attached to the original preliminary plat, as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on March 25, 1986 (including those conditions of approval adopted by the Hearing Examiner Committee attached to the Board's decision as Exhibit A, dated November 1985) together with the following updated conditions. 2. The applicant/owner should show continued progress toward complying with Section 12.100.118 of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time. 3. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval to June 1, 2001. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING (UPDATED) 1. Subsequent extension of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial compliance with Chapter 12.100.118 (Extensions of Time) of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance; otherwise the preliminary plat approval will become null and void. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES (UPDATED) 1. Site development shall comply with the current Spokane County standards for Road & Sewer construction and the guidelines for stormwater management. DATED THIS 5t DAY OF MAY, 1998. W.PED RSON nior Planner Extension of Time PE- 1504 -85 3 Under State Law and County Ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner. If you desire to file an appeal, you must submit the appropriate Appeal Application together with the required Fee, payable to the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. Upon receipt of a complete appeal application, a public hearing will be scheduled. If you have any questions, please call the Division of Building and Planning at 456 -3675. c : Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads Spokane County Division of Building & Planning Spokane County Division of Utilities Spokane County Division of Utilities - Stormwater Utility Spokane Regional Health District Spokane County Fire District No. 1 Hanson Industries, Inc. John Konen, David Evans & Associates Simpson Engineering File Extension of Time PE- 1504 -85 4 96 0338 NO. BINDING SITE PLAN BSP -48 -96 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR SPOKANE COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF FILING THE FINAL BINDING SITE PLAN, BSP- 48 -96, IN SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 25 N., RANGE 44 E.W.M., SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, that the Binding Site Plan BSP- 48 -96, being that portion of Section 11, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: PARCEL "A "; Lot 1, Block 1, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER, according to plat recorded in Volume 19 Plats, Pages 25 and&26, in Spokane County, Washington. PARCH "B "• That portion of the Southwest quarter of SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST, W.M. in the Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1 of the Plat "Sullivan Park Center," according to plat recorded in Volume 19 Plats, Pages 25 and 26; thence South 06 °28' 18" East along the West line of said Lot 1, 865.00 feet; thence South 56 °26'27" East along said Westerly line, 778.50 feet to a point on the Northerly right of way of Interstate 90, said point being the beginning of a non - tangent curve concave to the Northeast with radius of 2814.79 feet and a radial bearing of South 18 ° 16'04" West; thence Northwesterly, through a central angle of 10 ° 04'43 ", an arc distance of 495.14 feet to the end of curve; thence North 61°39'13" West 424.80 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the East with a radius of 50.00 feet; thence Northerly, through a central angle of 87 ° 23'32 ", an are distance of 76.26 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 816.20 feet and a radial bearing of South 64 °15'41" East; thence Northeasterly, through a central angle of 32 ° 12'37 ", and arc distance of 458.85 feet to the end of curve; thence North 06 °28' 18" West 376.19 feet to a point on the Southerly right of way of Indiana Arvenue being 37.00 feet South of the centerline, said point being on a curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6768.56 feet and a radial bearing of South 05 °52'45" East; thence Easterly along said Southerly right of way, through a central angle of 00 °35'33 ", an arc distance of 70.00 feet to the Westerly line of said Sullivan Park Center and a change in right of way from 37.00 feet to 38.00 feet South of the Centerline of said Indiana Avenue; thence South 06 °28' 18" East 1.00 feet to the point of beginning. UPON THE RECOMMENDATION of the Spokane County Building and Planning Division, the Binding Site Plan is approved with the exception that the public rights of way dedicated in this Binding Site Plan will be established for maintenance purposed until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a separate resolution of the Board of County Commissioners. ADDITIONALLY, until the Binding Site Plan document is filed in the Spokane County Auditor's Office, this Binding Site Plan has only preliminary Binding Site Plan status and is subject to expiration and null and void status if not periodically granted an extension of time consistent with the policies and procedures of the Building and Planning Division. RESOLUTION By: 86 0338 PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE of the Board lie 1 eaea# ssanne Montague, Deputy Clerk ZL_ DAY OF APRIL, 1996. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON II��i /Iii:I • ill D. Harr it Lir /Jo ' o hairperson Air kelley, Dis i et 1 ve Hasson, District 2 :- NOV 15 r 99 14: 47 R. R. HRNS^N r& ' t_t " Prele - � ' " 4 0 2/ 'NS' CovV!T/OWS. al *WWI ', File Nu. . 1 7`4 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on March 6, 1981, and the members of the Committee present being Jane Myers, Chairperson, Eldon Thomas and Ron MoVicker. B. PROPOSAL. The sponsor, Spokane Mall Associates, is requesting approval of a zone reclassifi- cation, File No ZE- 180 -78, Agricultural to Restricted Industrial for the purpose of developing a shopping mall, offices, and light industrial uses. C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the' area is residential, commercial, 1 -90, Spokane River, and undeveloped. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for indus- trial development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 7. That the applicant has demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the pro- posed rezone is justified. 8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor dis- approval of the proposed use. 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public . health, safety, and welfare. 11. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) The proposed request is for a logical land use of the area. 1 P.2 /6 4.1:-1ti0 -/6 r'1 g •. ta r' D. NOV 15 '89 14:47 R.R.HRNSON CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. 1. The specific development plan will be submitted for Hearing Examiner Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 2. All current standards of the Restricted Industrial Zone, as amended, shall be complied with in the development of this site. 3. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning storm - water runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff. 4. That the provisions of •SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolution 4477 -1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on' -site improvements. 5. That, pursuant to WAC 197 -10 -040 (2)(a) and (20), WAC 197 -10 -155 and SCEO 11.00.055 the rezone is an action subject to SEPA, but insufficient detail concerning the proposal is available to permit mean- ingful environmental analysis at the rezone level, consequently a detailed site plan, subject to full compliance with Chapter 43.21C RCW, shall be submitted for consideration to the Hearing Examiner Committee • at a later date. Furthermore, it is hereby stipulated that, because of project details not now available, the Committee may require additional Information pursuant to WAC 197 -10 -330 and may deny or condition the approval of said project at the site plan review stage, pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.060 RCW. 6. That, pursuant to Chapter 43.21C, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), an environ- mental impact statement was prepared. Mitigating measures as Identified in the Environmental documents shall be complied with in the develop- ment of a specific site plan for future review and approval. COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1, The existing roadway network in the vicinity of the Sullivan Park Center can not effectively handle the estimated traffic which will be generated by (serve) the proposed site. 2. Department of Transportation letter dated October 7, 1980, first para- graph:. "It should be noted that a Diamond lntercjiange has been recommended by the Department, not the ' Interchange" as stated in the Appendix" 3. Draft Environmental Impact Statement, I. Introduction and Summary, page 6, paragraphs 2 and 3: Sullivan Road /Interstate 90 Interchange - An "Urban Interchange" is required to provide an acceptable level of service at this intersection. It should be constructed as a six -lane divided section with dual -left turning lanes in all quadrants of the intersection. 2 P.3 /6 4 NOV 15 '89 14:48 R.R.HRNSON r i'liu iw. /..4 iu'V/61$ The "Urban Interchange" concept has substantially greater traffic carrying capacity than a conventional diamond interchange and requires substantially less right-of-way. Both of these features are crucial in the development of Sullivan Park Center. it should be noted that without the "Urban Interchange" this intersection could not accommo- date the mall and peripheral densities proposed. 4. Because adequate access can not be guaranteed, the "Urban Inter- change" may not be constructed and the existing railroad grade cross- ing relocated, we therefore recommend dennlall of this proo_posad zone change. c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized east of Sullivan Road with provisions being made for future public sewers, This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW, Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improve- ment district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. 3. Any water service for this protect shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, 4. That provisions be made for public sewers west of Sullivan Road. d) COUNTY 'HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Findings: a) This project lies over the Spokane Aquifer. b) It is within Critical Water Supply Service Area #3 and within the service area of Consolidated Irrigation District. Groundwater resources appear adequate to support development at this density. c) The project is inside the 201 Sewer Study Area Zone 3 and inside the Primary Sanitary Sewer Area recommended in the "208" Study. The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities pursuant to County Resolution 80 -0418 adopted March 24, 1980. The topography and soils in the area are gen- erally suitable for use of individual on -site sewage systems. The lot is of the proper dimensions to permit use of both an individual well and sewage system. NOV 15 '89 14:48 R.R.HRNSON I'Ilc Nu. Lt 2. Recommendations: a) Water service must be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. b) Water service shall be by an existing public water supply. c) The use of individual wells is not authorized. d) Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. e) Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by • the Health Officer, the use of individual on -site sewage, disposal systems may be authorized. f) The owner, his heirs, and successors shall agree to not protest legal assessments and utility local improvement districts to provide central sewerage service to lots in this plat. g) A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and, the Health Officer prior to the issuance of any building permit for this lot. a) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. approval with condition that prior to development of this property that an engineered water distribution system plan shall be submitted to the Spokane County Department of Building and Safety. This distribution plan shall include water main size, flows, locations, fire hydrant type and locations, water storage tanks size, and location and design criteria. f) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Purveyor is Consolidated Irrigation District 419, and they will supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire. and irrigation uses. SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT, 1. Mains and hydrants to be installed, in accordance with the Spokane ' County Department of Building and Safety. 2. A plan for emergency equipment access is required to be submitted ' prior to any land development. '9) h) DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1. A surface land mine reclamation permit and reclamation plan shall be required if more than two acres of contiguous land is to be disturbed or more than 10,000 yards of mineral is removed in any type mining operation. (For example, the removal of top soil or any other aggre- gate type of material to be sold or used for construction off the pro- posed development site.) E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Spokane Mall Associates, for a zone reclassification as described in the application should be approved. 4 NOV 15 '89 14:49 R.R.HRNSON File No. ZE- 1o• .1 • Motion by: Thomas Seconded by: McVicker Vote: Uninamous to Approve (3 -0) HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Chairperson - yam y )75 ATTEST; WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Director B y: .%l7` /4 (v.:2y?/-y-ze Date: 5 i _ ; No.90 0775 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WA. IN THE MATTER OF A ZONE CHANGE ) FROM RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL TO ) COMMUNITY BUSINESS (B -2) AND ) REGIONAL BUSINESS (8-3) AND ) GENERAL AGRICULTURAL (GA) IN ) CONJUNCTION WITH THE FINALIZA- ) TION OF A PORTION OF THE PRE- ) LIMINARY PLAT OF SULLIVAN PARK ) CENTER, FILE NO. PE 1504 -85 ) AND ACCOMPANYING REZONE FILE ) NO. ZE- 180 -78 ) R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Revised Code of Washington, Section 36.32.120(6), the Board of County Commis- sioners of Spokane County has the care of County property and the management of County funds and business; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of chapter 36.70 and chapter 58.17 RCW, the Board of County Commissioners approves final plats and accompanying rezone applications; and WHEREAS, the . Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee, on November 19, 1985, approved the preliminary plat of the Sullivan Park Center, under File No. PE- 1504 -85 (Sullivan Park Center), and accompanying rezone under File No. ZE- 180 -78, subject to certain conditions, including Condition No. 6 of the Spokane County Planning Department, providing as follows: 6. Upon filing the Final Plat, the zone change of the Final Plat area shall be finalized, and the existing Agricultural and Restricted Industrial zone classifications shall be in accordance with the zoning concept plan. WHEREAS, pursuant to Spokane County Resolution No. 90 -0479, executed on the 24th day of April, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners approved a portion of final plat of Sullivan Park Center, under File No. PE- 1504 -85, and in conjunction therewith, the Board is now desirous of finalizing the zoning of those lots within the approved portion of said final plat of Sullivan Park Center; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, that the Board, as authorized under County Planning Department Condition No. 6, set forth in the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Findings and Order dated November 19, 1985, quoted hereinabove, and in conjunction with the approval of a portion of a final plat of the Sullivan Park Center, more particularly described in Spokane County Resolution No. 90- 0479, does hereby rezone those lots included within the final plat of Sullivan Park Center filed in the Spokane County Auditor's Office under document no. 9004260071 on April 26, 1990, and recorded in the Spokane County Auditor's Office in Book 19, page 25 of Plats, as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, is rezoned from Restricted Industrial to B -3; Lot 2, Block 1, is rezoned from Restricted Industrial to B -2; Lot 1, Block 2, is rezoned from Restricted Industrial to GA; and Lot 2, Block 2, is rezoned from Restricted Industrial to B -3. ATTEST: PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of June, 1990. WILLIAM E. DONAHUE, Clerk .' the Board By Dep Cler John 20 0775 BOARD nF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 0 SPO'ANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON d =r1 :e S 1 a I: .� N L= {•': trH::rY C 0 U N Y September 6, 1994 OFFK.E or' Couvrrcn.wvasroNres r((�� I)F "SKIP I G RI I. IST DISTRICI • SI EVEN HASSON, 2ND UISTCT • PATRICIA A. pp ECEIVI+THI UISIIUCI Mr. Thomas L. Mulkey Vice President, Development /Leasing Price Development Company 35 Century Park Way Salt Lake City, Utah 84115 Dear Thomas: This letter is a follow up to our recent discussion concerning the proposed Spokane Valley Mall that is being developed by your organization. It is my understanding that Price Development is desirous of increasing the square footage of that mall from a first phase 650,000 square feet configuration to a more expanded facility that would contain 815,000 square feet of gross leasable area. Apparently such increase is necessary to insure the financial integrity of that mall and given the necessity to remain market competitive. It was my impression that in return for Spokane County's advocacy for such expansion that you would provide assurances that this project was not only doable but actually proceeding toward construction. To that end you offered to have the anchor tenants call me within 60 days of our August 9 meeting leaving me some degree of certainty that those tenants were ready to proceed. Upon receipt of such communication I will be better positioned to be an advocate for your request, as well as, others who desire development of this facility. Hopefully you will be able to follow through with this assurances offer. OU TS, Hasson, un y Commis sio nnv c: Marshall R. Farnell, CAO Wally Hubbard, Planning Director SEP 0 81994 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT WI.SI 1116 BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0100 • (509) 456 -2265 Land Use Phase 1 Phase II Phase 111 Building Area PM Peak Daily Trip Ends (vpd) Trips (vph) In Out Building Area PM Peak Daily Trip Ends (vpd) Trips (vph) In Out Building Area PM Peak Daily Trip Ends (vpd) Trips (vph) In Out Commercial 650,000 sq.ft. 24,180 1,034 1,073 1,038,000 sq.ft. 38,510 1,453 1,972 1,348,000 sq.ft. 45,984 1,483 1,901 Business Park 294,000 sq.ft. 3,205 71 529 390,000 sq.ft. 6,268 94 703 Hotel 300 rooms 3,150 108 111 300 rooms 3,150 108 111 300 rooms 3,150 108 111 Industrial Park _ _ 330,000 sq.ft. 1,802 106 208 800,000 sq.ft. 3,505 255 504 Total 27,330 1,142 1,184 46,667 1,738 2,820 58,907 1,940 3,219 59,000 in Phase III. The directional trip estimates for the afternoon peak hour are also presented for each phase. An alternative first phase is also under consideration by the proponent, and is described in Table I in the Summary. The trip generation of this alternative Phase I would be 27,250 daily trips, and 1,200 outbound trips in the pm peak. Thus, the critical volume of peak -hour traffic would be nearly identical in either plan. TABLE IV PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Trip Distribution Trips were assigned to the roadway network on the basis of zonal population forecasts prepared by the Spokane Regional Planning Conference in February 1985. These forecasts include both population and employment predictions for the years 1990, 1995 and 2000. Population forecasts were also obtained for Kootenai County, Idaho to reflect the eastern portion of the market area. A simplified gravity model was used to distribute trips among these zones, using travel time as a measure of impedance. '!ENVIRONMENTAL REEVALUATION /CONSULTATION CPR 771.129 DISTRICT /DIVISION :SR :PROJECT :PROGRAM :FEDERAL AID. il :PROJECT A • PROJECT .TITLE,.ENVIRONMENTA.L DOCttENT TYPE AND DATE APPnOVEO Evergreen Road Interchange, MP 291 Vicinity. The concept design for this interchange was evaluated in the, Spokane Interstate 90 Four Lakes to Idaho State Line Final EIS approved July 21, 1989. ' REASON + CONSULTATION. The proposed Evergreen Road Interchange has been redesigned from the concept design evaluated in the Four Lakes to Idaho State Line FEiS (1989)'. In addition, the Four Lakes to Idaho State Line FEIS was a corridor -revel planning EIS, rather than a project -level EIS. This Environmental Reeva!uati.pn Construction examines the design details of the :revised proposal, and evaluates whether new or different project 'effects from those described in the earlier FE1S would be expected. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGED L:.NDITIuNS The full- diamond interchange is proposed to be located approximately 750 feet east of the location evaluated in the Four Lakes to Idaho State Line FEIS (1989). Weaving lanes mould be added between the proposed Evergreen interchange and Sullivan interchange ramps to the east. The revised design and location would avoid an existing water tower north of the intersection of Evergreen Road with Mission .Avenue, and would minimize impacts to the water well system. Construction of a new interchange at Evergreen Road would reduce the traffic pressure and future congestion at the Pines Road and.Sullivan Road interchanges resulting from regional comnerciai, empioynient, and population growth. Spokane County has approved the ultimate development of the proposed Sullivan Park Center mixed -use retail /comnercial and office /light industrial complex north of the proposed Evergreen interchange. Conditions of the approval include construction' of the interchange at Evergreen Road among others. Have any new or revised laws or regulations been issued since approval of the last environmental document that affect this project? Yes ( ) No (X) (if yes explain, additional. sheets if necessary) WILL THE CHANGED CONDITIONS AFFECT 1HE FOLLOWING -DIFFERENTLY THAN DESCRiBtD IN THE ORIGINAL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (If yes attach a detailed. summary addressing the impacts and mitigation) 1) Threatened or Endangered Species 2) Prime •and Unique Farmland 3) Wetlands 4) Floodplains 5) Hazardous Waste Sites . 6) Historic or Archaeological Sites 7) 4(f),Lands 8) 6(f)).Lands WILL THESE CHANGES RESULT IN ANY CONTROVERSY? Yes ( ) No (X) (if yes explain) The' changed conditions do not result in any controversy. WILL THE CHANGES CAUSE ADVERSE IMPACTS IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS: (if yes address ;comments below) 1) Air Quality 2) Noise 3) Land Use • 4) Traffic or Transportation 5) Land Use. 6) Displacement (business cr residence) 7) Economic Growth and Development 8) Water Quality 9) Visual Quality 10) Natural Resources and Energy 11) Public Services and Utilities 12) Vegetation and Wildlife 13) Recreation YES NO YES NO () (X) (X) ( ) X ( ) (X) (X) ( (X) ) ( ) (X) ( ) (X) (X) ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) (X) ( ) (X) ( ) (X) CONCLUSIONS AND /OR RECOMMENDATIONS The revised interchange design substantially eliminates impacts on the existing water. tower north of the intersection of Evergreen Road with Mission Avenue, and is expected to minimize impacts to the water well system in the 'i mediate vicinity. However, the reduced interchange would result in the displacement of a single- family residence /day care business. I concur with the conclusions and recom,endatio;;s above District /Division Official Date WSDOT HQ Official FH'WA Official Date Date 1/ . WILL TIME .CHANGED CONDITIONS AFFECT THE FOLLOWING DIFFERENTLY THAN DESCRIBED IN THE ORIGINAL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT? 1. Threatened and Endangered Species In June 1987 the 'Washington State Department of Natural Resources determined that no rare plants, high quality native plant commUnitieS or native wetlands were located in the vicinity of the project (Four Lakes to Idaho State Line FEIS, 1989). • In June 1987 USFWS determined that to the 'best of their knowledge, .nolisted or proposed threatened or endangered species occurred within she study area (Four Lakes•tu Idaho State Line FEIS, 1989). The Washington Department of Wildlife, Nongame Program, has no record of endangered or threatened animals in the vicinity of the . proposed project (Biology /Wetlands Report, 1987). 2. Prime and Unique Farmland, There are currently no fields under agricultural production adjacent to the site of the proposed Evergreen interchange. The : Evergreen Interchange site is not classified as prime farmland by the Soil Conservation Service (Four Lakes to Idaho State Line FEIS, 1989). 3. Wetlands • • No wetlands are mapped in the vicinity of the proposed interchange in the National 'Wetlands inventory (Four Lakes to Idaho State Line FEIS, 1989). Field investigations conducted by Shapiro and .Asociates,• Inc. on July 27, 1990 confirm that no wetlands would be affected by the revised interchange design. 4. Floodplai:is • The proposed Evergreen Inter.c'hange site is not located in a flood hazard area as identified by the Department'of Housing and Urban Development Flood Hazar u d Boundary Map (1977). The Four Lakes to ' idaho State.Line FEIS (1989) determined that there would be no •::adverse impacts to floodplains due to construction along 1 -90 in • the•vicinity of Evergreen Road. 5. `Hazardous Waste Sites • .::The proposed right -of -way for the proposed Evergreen interchange includes no known hazardous waste locations -and has no history of Thctivity associated.'+'ith hazardous waste contamination (Four Lakes to Idaho State Line FEIS, 1539). Buildings in the area 6. • Historic or Archeological Sites .Construction within .the right-of-way will not affect cultural .:resources. No structures or features associated with this project' qualify for the National Register for Historic Places. the SHPO concurred in determination of no effect on cultural resources (Four Lakes to Idaho State Line ;EIS, 1989). 7. 4(f) Lands . No right - -,aay will be required from any designated public park .(Four,Lakes to Idaho State Line FEIS, 1989). • .that need to be removed could contain asbestos that would need to be removed prior to demolition. A complete asbestos inventory wi11 be conducted before any structures or water pipes are ,removed. 8. 6(fl. Lands No right -of -way will be required from any designated public park (Four Lakes -to Idaho State Line FEiS, 1989). WILL.THE•CHANGES CAUSE ADVERSE IMPACTS IR THE FOLLOWING AREAS: 1. Air.Quality • New federal standards for a criteria pollutant, PM10 (particulate :matter less.than 10 microns) have been utilized by EPA since the OEIS was circulated.' Therefore, reevaluation of PM10 will be ' »done on a case -by -case basis. The same impacts from construction exist (Four Lakes to Idaho State Line FEIS, 1989). • :Carbon monoxide (C0)- concentrations at nearby receptors would not change substantially as a result of the revised interchange '.design. Several residences along Mission Avenue would be exposed to particulates during construction, due to' construction -activities. Control measures will be required to reduce emissions during construction. 2. Noise Construction activities will meet all federal, state, and local ;regulations. Noise levels are expected to increase 3 dBA over the next 20 years (Four Lakes to Idaho State Line =EIS, 1989). Construction activities under the revised interchange design would increase noise levels at several residences along Evergreen H and Mission Avenue. Shifting the interchange. to the east • would increase noise exposure for residences to the east rather than at residences to the west as would occur under the original alignment. increases in noise levels from nearby traffic would ' be similar to those described in the Four Lakes to Idaho State Line FEIS (1989). 3. Land Use Commercial development will continue to occur near interchange :locations. The freeway is within or lies 'adjacent to the .designated "Urban Area' zone (Four Lakes to Idaho State Line FE1S, 1989). 4. Traffic or Transportation • . " The - purpose of this. interchange is to relieve the congestion•at both Pine and Sullivan interchanges, but would result in increased traffic volumes on Evergreen Road north of Sprague (Four'Lakes to Idaho State Line FEIS, 1989). Automobile access to residences located along Mission Avenue at Evergreen Road is currently on Mission Avenue. Access would have to be relocated to the back of the residential structures off of Evergreen Road, therefore changing local circulation patterns. 5. Land Use .See response to 13 above. i Displacement One single- family residence /day care business and two out- buildings will be displaced at the southeast quadrant of the Evergreen Road /Mission Avenue intersection. in addition, two single- family residences on the east side of Evergreen Road would loose substantial frontage and experience increases in noise exposure from traffic. The.Unifohm Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policy Act of 1970 ensures a fair :market value for property as well as relocation assistance for those displaced (Four Lakes to Idaho State Line FEIS, 1989). 7. Economic Growth and Development This project would have a positive impact on the area's construction industry. As stated earlier, there will continue to be commercial development near interchange locations which, in turn, will create jobs. This could spur residential development as well (Four Lakes to Idaho State Line FEIS, 1989). 8. Water Quality The site of the proposed Evergreen interchange overlies the Spokane Valley- Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer. An elevated water tank and three wells that withdraw from the aquifer are located in the vicinity of the proposed interchange. The revised alignment of. the interchange will avoid encroachment on these water supply facilities. Any modifications to the freeway drainage system will conform to 203 program standards of the Spokane County Water Quality Management plan. The changes to the proposed Evergreen Interchenge.would not result in additional or increased impacts to water quality beyond those identified in the Four Lakes to Idaho State Line FEIS. 9. Visual Quality The strip of ponderosa pine will remain in order to preclude visual encroachment. The revised Evergreen Interchange design includes an overpass structure at Mission Avenue over Evergreen Road. Evergreen Road would be lowered about 20 -feet at Mission Avenue in order to accommodate the overpass structure. Two secondary intersections would be.developed to accommodate.1ocal traffic. One would be located on Mission Avenue 450 feet east of the existing Evergreen Road /Mission Avenue Interchange and one would be located on Evergreen Road 500 feet south of its existing intersection with Mission Avenue. The interchange is proposed to be located 750 feet east of the location•analyzed in the Four Lakes to idand State Line FEIS (i989)..: This new alignment would displace two out -build L.gs located at the southeast quadrant of Evergreen Road and Mission Avenue. The day care facility located 100 feet east of these out- buildings also would be displaced. 10. 'Natural Resources and Energy The Four Lakes to Idaho State Line FEIS concluded that there would be no adverse impacts to energy resulting from the proposed project. In addition, the environmental impacts to topography, geology and soils will be the sane as those described in the Four Lakes to Idaho State Line FEIS. Placement of the overpass support structures along Mission Avenue .would require the relocation of utility lines and poles currently located along the right -of -way. in addition, these support structures and the overpass would interrupt existing views of the surrounding area. The addition of the new 1-90 structure would constitute the major visual change. 11. Public Services and Utilities The revised Evergreen Interchange design will avoid any encroachment on the well system and water tower. Temporary delays may occur for emergency vehicles (Four Lakes to Idaho State Line FEIS, 1989). 12. Vegetation and Wildlife Vegetation: To build t'he �terchange at Evergreen Road approximately 20 acres of vegetation w ould be affected. This includes communities of native bunchgrasses, weedy plants, and planted grasses. In addition, three acres of ponderosa pine forest will be removed in this area. Overall, impacts on native vegetation will be minor �e (Biology/Wetland Report, 1937). The revised interchange design' will not substantially change effects on vegetation.. Wildlife: The primary impact to wildlife will be the localized and temporary displacement of small mammals, birds, and reptiles in proportion to the amount of land cleared. There will be a permanent net loss of habitat in the areas 'actually paved for new lanes and interchanges. Species most affected will be Columbia ground squirrels and other common rodents (Biology /Wetlands Report, 1987). There will be no impact • to fish.from the proposed interchange (Biology /Wetlands Report, 1987). During construction, Best Management Practices will be used to • ensure that poliutait runoff from the site would not impact the Spokane River. Attempts will be made to preserve existing vegetation whenever possible. 13. Recreation There would be no significant adverse impacts on recreation (Four Lakes to Idaho State Line FLIS, 19d9). February 9, 1994 Mr. Pete Szobonya, P.E. Project Manager Keller Associates, Inc. 545 Benjamin Lane, Suite 185 Boise, Idaho 83704 Dear Mr. Szoboyna: In accordance with your discussion with Mr. Glenn Miles, enclosed are two plots of the Spokane regional base network in the vicini- ty of a proposed interchange at I -90 and Evergreen Road. One plot represents the network with the interchange constructed and the other plot shows the no -build network. If you have any questions about these networks, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Glenn F. Miles Transportation Manager Bill Bennett Sr. Transportation Planner enclosures cc: Mr. Gary Kennaly r SPOKANE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL 808 W. Spokane Falls Blvd • Spokane. WA 99201 -3337 • 509/625 { 370 . its) e l.` 1j� < o 9 vr Y X 625 -6988 !> LL 11 f- / �Vc•� ;rEE -c Elir, er <5 wars ©n G rZ `l K A,/,v/4 c y 520 3c' 44e-fuze L_ / 6-4 u>e Or'ecci C! e‘v 94tIt 4,42,-s21 77 7 - I. 5 for- 1Oe.i9ri/P/a / 4 c5pch_ CLe4) P tic,f 0 1=7_2.<X_ , (-"7 fl , o G ; - .: - - 4' ir„+,,n Co . 44 4 i/5 Co - -6 _ th"c / ' ? �c5 - - 7/90 4 &7 -02 5 7 A , Washington State De part m ent of 7Y ansport tion Duane Berentson Secretary of Transportation Mr. Ron Hormann Spokane County Engineers W 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99201 Dear Mr. Hormann: JBP:mt Attachment cc: L Jacobsen, HQ Environmental Office G Janousek E Swanson Design File Environmental File } February 3, 1994 Thank you for your interest and cooperation in this matter. District 6 2714 North Mayfair Street Spokane, WA 99207 -2090 (509) 456 -3000 Fax (509) 456 -3089 Subject: Evergreen Interchange Meeting The meeting to discuss the Evergreen Interchange evaluation will be held Wednesday, February 9, 1994 at 9:00 a: m. in the large conference room of the Washington State Department of Transportation at 2714 North Mayfair Street, Spokane WA. The purpose of this meeting is to set the direction for the appropriate environmental documentation for the Evergreen Interchange. The original document was programmatic and committed to re -evaluating each project as it came on line. Due to the scale of this project it appears logical that the termini for evaluation along Evergreen Road would be I -90 and Sprague Avenue and East to West, Pines Road and Sullivan Road. The question of alternatives for improvements to Evergreen Road are central to this evaluation. There are several potential impacts that need to be evaluated. FHWA and WSDOT are in concurrence that this project needs to be re- evaluated and that all potential environmental and social impacts be addressed. It is our intention that this undertaking be an effort that involves all affected and interested parties and that the findings are based on sound investigation and documentation. Sincerely, - Gc - CC, GARY J.&NOUSE Assistant District Administrator, Development EVERGREEN INTERCHANGE MP 290.69 TO MP 291.35 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION February 9, 1994 Meeting The discussion at the meeting will include but not be limited to the following potential impact areas: 1. Air Quality - The boundaries of the CO Non - Attainment area have been expanded since the EIS was published. The Evergreen I/C area is now within the area. Therefore a detailed air quality study will be required to comply with local, state and federal regulations. 2: Traffic - Traffic along Evergreen is predicted to rise from 4,000 to 30,000 vehicles per day. Effects on street networks, percentage of truck traffic, changes in route usage and mitigation must be addressed. 3. Noise - Noise studies must be performed to determine the impacts and address mitigation measures to the area along Evergreen between I -90 and Sprague Avenue. FHWA regulations require consideration of noise mitigation if standards are exceeded 4. Residential Displacement - A review must be conducted to determine if the impacts significantly differ with those outlined in the FEIS. 5. Visual Quality- How would visual quality be impacted by this project? 6. Schools and Student Transportation (Access) - How will schools and student access be impacted by this project? The question of safety issues due to increased traffic Evergreen must be addressed. 7. Community Cohesion - Will there be any impacts to community cohesion? 8. Regional and Community Growth - The question of increased commercial development, zoning changes and the resultant impacts need to be resesearched and discussed. 9. Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities - Surveying for existing facilities, sidewalks and shoulders and exploration of enhancements or mitigation measures need to be addressed in the document. 10. Property Values - The issue of changes to property values needs to be addressed and short and long term effects projected and discussed. 11. Public Involvment - Additional public involvement opportunities need to be provided to respond to citizens previously aired concerns and to allow additional comment and inform the public of the findings of the re- evaluation. Washington State ®® Department of Transportation Duane Derentson Secretary of Transpocation Ms. Linda Tompkins Lukins & Annis, PS 1600 Washington Trust Financial Center Spokane, WA 99204 JCL:mj Enclosures t',,A C4tt-se-, t 40i -o-lfo District 6 2714 Nartn Mayfair Street Spokane. WA 99207 -2090 (5091 456-3000 Fax (6 90 1 456 -3089 re P.:77Thit June 23, 1993 i a ar- ANNut Re: SR 90 Evergreen Interchange Design and Access Hearing Dear Ms. Tompkins: As a result of ongoing efforts involving the Washington State Department of Transportation, Spokane County and private developers, we are now ready to present this proposed project at a design and access hearing. The hearing is scheduled for July 8, 1993 at the Red Lion Inn in Spokane Washington (see the enclosed hearing notice). This proposed project involves the addition of a new interchange on Interstate 90 between the Pines Road Interchange and the Sullivan Road Interchange in the Spokane Valley. The funding for this project is currently proposed to be a combined effort involving the private developers, WSDOT, Spokane County and Transportation Improvement Board (TIB). In addition to you and the affected property owners, this information has been mailed to various transportation, governmental and elected officials, as well as local fire, police and school districts. . LENZI strict Ad By this correspondence I am both requesting your input on this project and extending an invitation to the July 8 design and access hearing. Enclosed is an Access Hearing Plan and a Notice of Appearance, for your information and use. If you have any questions regarding this or any other project involving District 6, please feel free to contact me at (509)456 -3030. Thank you for your continued interest in the transportation issues involving this region. Sincerely, C NOTICE OF DESIGN AND ACCESS HEARING You are hereby notified that on the 28th day of May, 1993, the State Design Engineer proposed a plan for the establishment of certain fully controlled limited access facilities on a portion of I- 90, in the vicinity of Evergreen Road more particularly: Between Sta. 340 +00 and Sta. 375 +00 as shown on sheet 1 of 1 sheets of the limited access plan entitled "SR 90, EVERGREEN INTERCHANGE, MP 290.69 to MP 291.35, SPOKANE COUNTY" The proposed interchange will provide additional access to developing residential areas south of I- 90, as well as proposed commercial developments north of I - 90 (Sullivan Park Center). The proposed interchange will also relieve present and future congestion and improve traffic safety at the existing Pines Road and Sullivan Road Interchanges. The proposed Evergreen Interchange will provide additional access from I- 90 to the south along Evergreen Road and provide important links from the south across from I- 90 to Indiana with additional connections to Pines and Sullivan northbound. Finally, the new interchange will provide a direct connection from Sullivan Park Center and adjacent commercial/industrial developments to I- 90. In accordance with section 47.52 of the Revised Code of Washington and Section 128, Title 23, United States Code and any acts supplemental thereto, as a owner whose property is affected by the highway which it is proposed to be established as a limited access highway facility, as a county or town or as an interested citizen, you are hereby notified that a hearing as to design proposals and also a separate hearing concerning limited access proposals will be held on Thursday, July 8, 1993 at the Red Lion Motor Inn - Spokane located at 1100 North Sullivan Road, Veradale, Washington. The Design portion of the hearing will be an open house format begining at 5:00 p.m. and ending at 7:00 p.m. The formal Access hearing will start at 7:30 p.m. will be conducted to explain the project impacts to effected properties and the access to these properties. Testimony will be taken after the formal presentation. Those who attend the design portion of the hearing will be given an overview of the project. If they have questions specific to their own concerns, WSDOT officials will be on hand to answer questions one -on -one. When each participant is satisfied that his or her questions have been answered, they may present testimony either verbally or in writing to the court reporter. Testimony will be structured on a one -to -one basis as well, although participants are welcome to listen to each other's testimony. Individuals should anticipate the process taking about one hour of their time. Written testimony will also be accepted at the hearing or can be sent to Mike Frucci, WSDOT, District 6 Office at North 2714 Mayfair, Spokane, WA 99207. All written statements received by July 19, 1993 will be considered by the project administrators and will be included in the formal hearing record. Interpreters can be provided for persons with hearing impairments. Braille or taped information for people with visual impairments can also be provided. Please contact Jim Keller, Forsgren Associates/P.A., 545 Benjamin Lane, Suite 185, Boise, Idaho 83704, telephone (208) 375 -1992 by June 28. 1993, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. The hearing site is accessible to the physically handicapped. Plans, maps, a response to the National and State Environmental Policy Acts checklist, and other pertinent information about this project will be on display at the hearing together with written views received as a result of coordinated planning with interested agencies, officials, groups and persons. Department personnel will be present to discuss tentative right of way acquisition, construction schedules, relocation assistance programs, and to answer questions about the project. Information mentioned above concerning the project may be reviewed prior to the hearing by contacting Mike Frucci, WSDOT, District 6 Office at North 2714 Mayfair, Spokane, WA 99207 It is the purpose of this notice and of the hearing which it announces to provide for the fullest exchange of information possible regarding the effect on the community of the project being considered through full discussion and examination of the planning to date. This purpose is in consonance with and pursuant to RCW 47.52, the Federal Highway Act (Title 23 U.S.C., 101 et seq. 128) and amendments thereto. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AT LIMITED ACCESS HIGHWAY FACILITY HEARING TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Any statement, objection or counter - proposal you wish to have considered must be submitted by you or someone representing you at the hearing. Your statement may be oral or written. If your statement is written, it should be presented at the hearing to the Examiner conducting the hearing or to the State's attorney. As a courtesy to interested citizens, a copy of the Findings and Order will be furnished to all persons filing a Notice of Appearance prior to or at the hearing even though some may not properly be parties to the hearing. The Acceptance of a Notice of Appearance and the furnishing of a copy of the Findings and Order, does not necessarily mean that the recipient is recognized to be a proper party to the hearing. Pursuant to the above, this party hereby files an appearance and requests a copy of the Findings and Order for the hearing to be held for the designation of limited access on: STATE ROUTE 90, Evergreen Road Interchange, on July 8, 1993 at 7:30 p.m. in the Red Lion Motor Inn - Spokane, located at 1100 North Sullivan Road, Veradale, Washington. PARTY BEING REPRESENTED: Name. Address City State Zip REPRESENTED BY: (if same as PARTY BEING REPRESENTED, leave blank) *Name Address City State Zip Title (Attorney, Corporate Officer, Partner, etc.) *If you are representing more than one person, please submit an appearance form for each person represented. Additional blanks will be available at the hearing. PI. SIAIION OLI.IA RADIUS. IANGEN I IL NI:I'4 NS -w 86419.02 756'22 2864.79 198 80 396.97 N5 -w 91.4.90 ?330'02 1145.92 135.63 270 01 W -145 8641061 626'36' 2864.79 21146 422,16 W -N5 9345349 13'55'00 1149.92 140.34 229.31 1 -N5 109+84.85 151,4'59 2864 79 337 73 145 -E 103413.12 21'08'03" 114592 21122 _662.1121. 4226': 145 -4. 111400.56 1759'15 7864./9 4534 899.38 EVER 14460.48 54'00'00' 41812 253 86 4691+6 EVI R 21421.00 21'54'52 21610 15862 27391, EAR 32447.34 36'3000 216.20 23612 456 11014i4 14 28'35'31' 30200 24215 4H.25 04. u F e t INDIA/ IND • .u510t1_A BROADI Y ,'S1'IpGU,E_ " W g : a rc 1 � 1 - I • VICINITY MAP 0 2 • SCALE IN MILES ACCESS NOTES: I1PE 0 APPROACH IS AN OFF AND ON APPROACH 114 LEGAL MANNER, FOR SPECIAL PURPOSE AND WIDTH TO BE AGREED UPON. It MAT BE SPECIFIED AT A POINT TO BE SATISFACTORY TO THE STATE AT OR BETWEEN DESIGNATED HIGHWAY STATIONS. 1E6[840 1 O 200 400 SCALE IN FEET 9EGINNING Or PLAN SR 90 51A. 340 +00 P.O.0 MP 290.69 Ern uPs u Low RAC Ana / / / / / / /// JIT N? • - CST + � mmm T -10 SPOKANE' - NE '2+. NE '2+. SECTION 15 E 18+11.)1 14155101 AVENU UNDERCROSSING C0 I 1 H.n fin! 6. Low ACCESS APPROACH SCHEDULE 1.1 PI .ltJ)IVJNA'W F M40.441N...9.)H.A4+ .Y+'J.Sr.Y ztSatL:PA4ARctN. 4• ..I.4.44.. T • I R //W A840 11/A 20 ' [1C 81118 013 5 41ED 10 I5 COONEY 8P L IA 9441 CCr5l6 UC1KM 8nnr8S 10 K [ND Or FULL 1.0(41104 1.342A.40 T. 25 N. R. 44 E. W.M. P 360 CONSTRICTION BY ?TIERS MISSION & 94155101 IC 12+2362 P0. CONNECTOR INIERSECCIION 194 1 0 +00 la 14 EVERGREEN A MISSION E 12+24.93 P.O.Cw CONNLCIOR 1NIENSLCIION 6 10+00 (*sp 1411 '2 +. It fr A1..+.1[ 1 Nil, INDIANA A [v[RGR[[N INI INSLC111014 - 1434 '6. TOTAL 11116TH RAN AN = 0.66 MILE Ut IT 4A PVC. 115 SunpNA*I 4700.14 EVERGREEN ROAD INTERCHANGE [NO Or 0I4lN O ILp UNOERCPOSSING }5B ONIRL / E 384458 P.OJ 1 1 C2)1L9 [3f_2LViL9G� YF 5E '6. SE '2+. SECIIDN 10 i 5w 'l.. 5w 1 ;TIC ❑111 11 R//W A 1//A 10 OE RE UNOl115NLD 10 110011 R0 CONTROL IR /w, LIA ANp COIPI SPOt.ANE COUNTY f ULL COi41ROL E 33.77.64 4 UY 001185 RA VLyOq _ 11'29 2159 O i. N POGO f 2 IN 1 LVL P RGRLL+38.52 P 0.1 3 j p - � +3B.52 0.1 - N r P AV 5R 90 SIA. 375+00 P.O. MP 291.35 s4 F O R S G R E N ASSOC IAT ES / P.A. L I s 20 104 1,3 AM LELA 1 � ir0� 51CN074 14 1,_. 1 I P l P t m l l *Gaff g0 5t41 II 26.9"Y WPM rt nArt NS+a :Haan w.x9, 1113 SR 90 MP 290.69 TO MP 291.: EVERGREEN ROAD INTERCHANI VICINITY y'UA`E CCI.l1T flat car•M 1141141.0.00 10 flaw 471.00 ••••••30:01111 err 1••••0Ert d 1 lA 0.9rA •AfM10l srart 0ir.AA 6 4:11[• LAO 2. 3 IS%O - Deter - tnerti Neel( Cot - kecen5Taccorio,J 04 Su /JA.J _Bon•. Sntevc.cb,a-ncte_ to _il2 Catact +7 tsi _ a . _ - Se co y i n v i n - . 6lrb c t . - n Snterciaa.,n c j e _ - t r W i c 1 e r. S u. \\ I u tlty _ Rc a o . /ll6rz lh el Z 70 C _ 4 _ __ 4vc Mr ecrlq�i. - - - -Si T. D • 9_nock1 - - -_ Sti6l_ vAty / 7 - _rh_ ree &CtiC et/. 19513 - X61___- _ w4_5. .v?T. _ a_ —S7,Y C)-7.✓7 Trzlolane,fnenit- en/ eft j29 dta..w:on a _IQS3-Ff`f 1.4)5D(s3 - - Determined m4T -- app - adecC Diamond o2 Urba Y, T n fiwzc 4w.•v+ e 5 Ceiack. Flor %?cceincr$7e Uffitrzaf2 5r�e !''X 'le/we Deter inn ined_ _br l _- L)50aT -_ Thnf_ ii rnrefechia.r/y deu 7meJ. p t a_ti. t:,,. Piero - px,o e,4 . Ljpa, A Q \44-Q- 1 ._ Ceim 11A-ea/van vn i) �" w a�a Are_ m1aP-d. 4 Vtio - v_ _ st; . _ r (/'c .. efir C 4. . r yrr.• ' z Q/ rrY�/rU�m en/5 7. 6 -- COO t'75 e-Vua 4:3 opo_ " P&aIr 5 et 000 " " - _ _ Lus-a7 I- 90 77 ..Souvrvo 30_ % _ s vs1/4,0Tact ;_ _I 672 !i 3 zo - 2- _ WO t 04_17-. celar1.0., PSI 44 - A-0 .••• _ 3,290 _ __12 93c3 7e o _ Sincerely, R. A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. RAYMOND A. HANSON President - - R. A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. "(Spp) 4874770 ' T. u �YPO � g 3 Mr.: Leonard Cash Washington State Department of Transportation North 2714 Mayfair street Spokane, Washington 99207-2090 RE: EVERGREEN INTERCHANGE HEARING TESTIMONY Dear Mr. Cash: We recognize that the proposed Sullivan Park Center development has been a catalyst for the proposed construction of the Evergreen Interchange. We acknowledge that the project will be a significant factor in redistributing traffic in the area as well as attracting additional traffic to the project area. However, we believe there is ample quantified evidence that current traffic in the area exceeds projections done at the time the project was approved. Additionally, residential and commercial growth in the areas has Notably other Meyer project at Sprague and Sullivan contributes 165,807 square • feet of additional retail space to the area space y' the Fred t expecedlton contribute Investment atrleast that Provan and o fan be e miletrade t type are generally evaluated on the basis of a five area which contemplates significant shopper access via the Sullivan Road interchange. Phase 2 of the Sullivan Park Center allows an additional 388,000 square feet of commercial space to be built when the interchange is built. Yet the Fred Meyer project adds over 42% of this amount of space and the Metropolitan project will likely bring the total near 100% of the of spa construction ce the Sullivan interchange project only on condition . This will clearly be an additional substantial traffic impact, not recognized when the initial cnclusionscwerey drawn u about n the need for and the impetus behind an interchange at Evergreen Road. We look forward to the continued planning and construction of our project and the Evergreen Interchange. We anticipate participating in a fair and equitable way in the funding of the costs of this project and would urge that the evaluation of that participation recognize all of the factors impactin traffic. g area • RECEIVED JUL 1 5 1993 1. C. CASH K Post -It'" brand tax transmittal memo 7671 . et peso • / lb 1,6 S2litG6t Frei" iGr `MA Cm c�t/.an-CS L co. 41 5 490 Dept. Phone. Fax 3z4' 34/7/ Far. 10/01 '93 11:41 ID :WSDOT DISTRICT 6 FAX :509- 456 -3089 PAGE 1 Washington State Department of Transportation Date: October I, 1993 , I fr From: Ted Trepanier /Greg Figg Phone: 456 -3996 Memorandum Subject: Pines & Indiana Intersection To: Bob Brueggeman; Spokane County Engineers In response to your September 7th FAX .regarding Simpson Engineers plan for the above intersection, WSDOT requires that an intersection /channelization plan be prepared for our approval. This plan must be approved by WSDOT locally and then shipped to our Headquarters in Olympia for final . approval. This intersection/channelization plan must be approved prior to starting work on the State right -of -way. If you have any questions about this plan please feel free to contact us at the above number. L qt BUSINESS PARK CONCEPT • ILLUSTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SULLIVAN PARK CENTER Spokane County, Washington COMMERCIAL CONCEPT INDUSTRIAL PARK CONCEPT _ NM1rsta \a DO � � L� C � North Consultant: Wilsey & Ham The Grantor(s) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ss On this day personally appeared before me Given under my hand and seal this stormde2 /forms,) SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Spokane County, Washington DRAINAGE EASEMENT r1 of the County of Spokane, State of Washington, for and in consideration of Mutual Benefits, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grants to Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, an Easement over, under, upon and, across the hereinafter described lands situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washington: DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, as shown hereinabove are for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted. The County of Spokane is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all drainage easements adjacent to the public right of way. The property owner shall maintain the drainage swale with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage swale as indicated by the approved plans. The Grantor(s) hereby releases Spokane County, and all its officers, employees, and agents from any responsibility or liability for any damage whatsoever including inverse condemnation by or to any and all persons or property arising out of or in any way incident to or attributable to the storm drainage within said Easement. The Easement described hereinabove is to and shall run with the land. No modification of the boundaries of said Easement can be made without the prior approval of Spokane County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, _ have hereunto set hand(s) and seal(s) this _ day of 19 personally known to me to be the individual(s) who executed the forgoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said individual(s), for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. day of , 19 Notary Public In and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane. December 8, 1993 Mr. Chuck Simpson, P.E. Simpson Engineers, Inc. N. 909 Argonne Road Spokane, Washington 99212 RE: Sullivan Park Center PE- 1504 -85 Dear Chuck: We received a submittal on December 1, 1993 from your office for the above referenced project. Said submittal is a partial submittal of the conditions which must be met for Phase II. The approved conditions call for a plan for the upgrade of the intersection at (SR 27) Pines and Indiana to be submitted to the County Engineer as specified in Condition #9 of the Condition of Approval for the above referenced project. Condition #9 says that WSDOT approval of the intersection design is required. We can not review the plans for Indiana west to (SR 27) Pines from Phase I limits until we have the required approval from WSDOT. Because the submittal is not consistant with the Conditions of Approval, we are returning your submittal to you with no review being done at this time. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer William H. `Hera ings, PE Development Services Engineer /Manager c: Gary Kennaly Ron Horman W. 1026 Broadway Ave. A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 FAX (509) 456 -4715 A") TO: Ronald Hormann, County Engineer FROM: Gary Kennaly, Planning & Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Sullivan Park Center: R.A. Hanson GENERAL INFORMATION: Location: Sullivan Road at 1 -90 Full Development: 2,538,000 ft Traffic Impacts: 59,000 New Trips Per Day Impacts: All improvements contained in adopted conditions of approval are to mitigate new traffic impacts created by the development proposal. The traffic study prepared by the developer's traffic consultant identified impacts to the existing State and County systems that needed to be mitigated with the Phase 1 (up to 650,000 ft proposal. The traffic study also identified the Phase 2 (an additional 1,012,000 ft impacts regarding a 1 -90 Interchange at Evergreen Road and the need to do an updated traffic study to determine the remaining Phase 2 impacts on the county road system regarding Sullivan Road, Evergreen Road and Mission Avenue. Also, to be included in the updated traffic study were any potential impacts to the Pines Road (S.R. 27) - Indiana Avenue intersection which is under State jurisdiction. In the mitigating measures and conditions of development approval, all of the "New" improvements needed to accommodate the traffic from the proposed development were to be the 100% responsibility of the developer. Also certain minimum improvements to the existing State and County systems needed solely due to the development's added traffic were to be 100% responsibility of the developer. All other county improvements identified in the Phase 2 updated traffic study were to be split on a pro rated basis between the developer and Spokane County on the basis of traffic impact counts. To date, no Phase 2 updated traffic study has been provided for our review and /or approval. Only at that time will the final impacts and final percent of responsibilities between the County and developer be determined. Other Developments: MEMORANDUM April 2, 1991 All major development proposals in the area have had similar off -site roadway improvement conditions placed upon them at the time of approval. All improvement conditions have been mitigating measures addressing development caused impacts on the existing road and highway systems. In each case the developer was G« Co P -I. Sullivan Park Center Page 2 required to prepare a detailed traffic study addressing the potential impacts of the development and proposing the appropriate mitigating improvement required to either eliminate or to reduce those impacts to acceptable operational levels. Typically mitigating conditions were taken directly from the developer's consultant's traffic engineering study of the respective proposals. By way of comparison, the Sullivan Park Center is approximately three times larger in developed floor area than either Black's Valley Mall or Cafaro's Liberty Lake proposal. The Sullivan Center is approximately five times larger than the new floor area proposed at the University City site. Even though the Sullivan Park Center traffic study used the most conservative trip per floor area generation rate (23 Trips per 1000 ft' vs. 37 Trips per 1000 ft', 40 Trips per 1000 ft', and 44 Trips per 1000 ft' respectively for the other proposals), a total of 59,000 new Trips per Day were estimated to impact the existing transportation systems. The E.I.S. identified significant impacts on both the County Road and State Highway system and likewise recommended significant transportation system improvements to adequately mitigate the impacts. Staff Analysis: Since the early 1970's all "regional" shopping center proposals have been analyzed in the same manner. This provides a consistent basis in reviewing impacts, considering mitigating measures and recommending conditions of approval. A brief review of the conditions of approval for the four regional proposals as noted in the above discussion reflects the desired consistent application of the County's policies and standards. GWK \SULLVNPK.MEM Sponsor/ Number/ Year Valley Mall Assoc. - 142A -77 1977 3 - I 37 TAuP5 (000 Pe Sullivan Park Center ZE- 180 -78 1986 f 2,3 717-rys 1 ro ou?t t Catero Co. ZE£9A -81 1987 2.4 Approx. 50 Ac Future hearing on detailed site Sullivan & plan, SEPA review required Mission 8 3o,ono PL 31 ,000 &pato rams DAY Portion of 226 Ac I. Landscape Plan /208, perimeters 1 -90 & Sullivan 2. Sign restrictions, lighting & signing plan 3. Special landscape mocha for Indiana extension 4. Park dedication near river NEW Tz P s 5. Dedication of landscaping near interchng V� 6. Phasing of development 2,538,000 Pt 5 Q 01 000 'W I L40 - L ro opts 3 - 7,000 COMPARISON OF VALLEY SHOPPING CENTER CONDITIONS Size /Location Planning Conditions 97 Ac 1. Landscape plan /208, perimeters 1 -90 at Liberty 2. Sign restrictions, lighting & signing Lake plan 3. Special 10' landscape strip on road Ne w W DwY County Engineers' Conditions I. Floodpiain controls 2. Imprvs. to Liberty Lake Rd adjacent site /signals 3. Imprvs. to Liberty Lake Rd. 300' south of site County Utilities 1. Imprvs. to adjoining Sullivan /signals 1. Interim sewer authorized 2. Imprvs. north to 1 -90 2. UUD agreement for 3. Imprvs. to adjoining Broadway sewers 4. Traffic revisions to streets adjacent to Broadway 5. Possible imprvs to Broadway east of �project & Flora Rd. south to Sprague `• S14...u. co,.o%Tr 1. Construction of Indiana from Sullivan/ 1. Interim sewer authorized signals to Pines 2. UUD agreement for 2. Construction of new ramps @ Sullivan sewers &I-90 3. Future construction /participation of Evergreen Interchange, connection to ndiana, connection to Mission 4. Participation in Imprvs. to Sullivan south to Sprague 5. Possible participation in imprvs. to Evergreen south to Sprague 6. Possible imprvs. to Pines interchange & Indiana 7. Possible extension of Evergreen north to Trent 8 Phasing & continued traffic studies to determine future needs 9. E tenstion of Indiana between Sullivan & Flora 10.Cooperationwith WSDOT on Evergreen interchange design 1. Connection to Ubeity Lake Sewer Di;. Sponsor/ Number/ Year Cafaro Co. (cont.) Size /Location VlinVest Development S. of U -City ZE- 50A -87 Expansion of 1989 University City s.` - 4So,000 PO- Nev./ 8 3G,Uo0 ftz rorA 40,000 TOTAL T/24 PS o,y ao,OOo mew T Ps D.4N/ 44 Zt's r oot, -Pe Planning Conditions 1. landscape plan /208. perimeters 2. Submittal of 'Master Development Plan' to Ptannirx� Director 3. Cooperation with STA 4. Sign restrictions; lighting & signing plan County Engineers' Conditions 4. Impvs. to future Liberty Lake Mall Blvd. to Henry Rd. 5. Participate in extension of Liberty take Mall Blvd. to Appfeway /Greenacres 1 -90 interchange 6. Possible imprvs. to Henry Rd., Sprague Ave. 7. Traffic signal imprvs. 8. Participate in Harvard Rd. & Greenacres Rd. /I -90 imprvs. County Utilities 1. Signal on Felts Rd. 1. Connection to County 2. Vacation oI Dartmouth Rd. sewer 3. Dedications along University Rd. 4. Imprvs. of University adjacent ownership 5. Sprague Ave. tum lanes, signals - . r 4m41)e/✓ue• Sponsor/ Number/ Year Valley Mali Assoc. ZE- 142A -77 1977 Sullivan Park Center ZE -180 -78 1980 Cafaro Co. ZE- 69A-81 1987 Approx. 50 Ac Sullivan & Mission COMPARISON OF VALLEY SHOPPING CENTER CONDITIONS Size /Location Planning Conditions Future hearing on detailed site plan. SEPA review required Portion oI 226 Ac 1. Landscape Plan /20a, perimeters 1. 1.90 & Sullivan 2. Sign restrictions, lighting & signing plan 3. Special landscape median for 2. Indiana extension 4. Park dedication near river 3. 5. Dedication of landscaping near interchng. 6. Phasing of development 4. 97 Ac 1. Landscape plan /208, perimeters 1 -90 at Liberty 2. Sign restrictions, lighting & signing Lake pan 3. Special 10' landscape strip on road County Engineers' Conditions 1. Imprvs. to adjoining Sullivan /signals 2. Imprvs. north to 1 -90 3. Imprvs. to adjoining Broadway 4. Traffic revisions to streets adjacent to Broadway 5. Possible imprvs to Broadway east of project & Flora Rd. south to Sprague County Utilities 1. Interim sewer authorized 2. ULID agreement for sewers Construction of Indiana from Sullivan/ 1. Interim sever authorized signals to Pines 2. UUD agreement for Construction of new ramps @ Sullivan sewers & 1 -90 Future construction /participation of Evergreen Interchange, connection to Indiana, connection to Mission Participation in Imprvs. to Suiliv south to Sprague 5. Possible participation In imprvs. to Evergreen south to Sprague 6. Possible imprvs. to Pines interchange & Indiana 7. Possible extension of Evergreen north to Trent 8 Phasing & continued traffic studies to determine future needs 9. Extenstion of Indiana between Sullivan & Flora 10.Cooperation with WSDOT on Evergreen interchange design 1. Floodptain controls 2. Imprvs. to Liberty Lake Rd adjacent site /signals 3. Imprvs. to Liberty Lake Rd. 300' south of site 1. Connection to Liberty Lake Sewer Dia sr Sponsor/ Number/ Year Calaro Co. (cont.) Size /Location YWinVest Development S. of U -City ZE- 50A -87 Expansion of 1989 .University City Planning Conditions 1. Landscape plan /208, perimeters 2. Submittal of 'Master Development Plan to Plannirxj Director 3. Cooperation with STA 4. Sign restrictions; lighting & signing plan County Engineers' Conditions County Utilities 4. Imprvs. to future Liberty Lake Mall Blvd. to Flenry Rd. 5. Participate in extension of Liberty Lake Mall Blvd- to Appleway /Greenacres 1 -90 interchange 6. Possible imprvs. to Henry Rd., Sprague Ave. 7. Traffic signal imprvs. 8. Participate in Harvard Rd. & Greenacres Rd. /I -90 imprvs. 1. Signal on Felts Rd. 1. Connection to County 2. Vacation of Dartmouth Rd. sewer 3. Dedications along University Rd. 4. Imprvs. of University adjacent ownership 5. Sprague Ave. tum Lanes, signals N CO March 6, 1991 Dear John: R. A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. 59 0 S Tel o e k x 8 3 n 2 e 64 W 7 A 4 Te e ( U ) 466 -0212 Mr. John McBride Board of County Commissioners Spokane County Courthouse W. 1116 Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 RE: Advancement of Development Schedules for Sullivan Park Center As you know, the R. A. Hanson Company recently sold 62.56 acres near Sullivan Road and I -90 to Price Development Company, 35 Century Park —Way, Salt Lake City, Utah 84115, - for the purpose of establishing a regional shopping center serving the Spokane Valley and portions of Kootenai County. The sale was completed following extensive negotiations with Spokane County departments and submittal of supplemental plan documents, including water systems, sewer systems, access road designs, freeway ramp /signal designs for Sullivan and Indiana, preliminary interchange design for Evergreen and I -90, lighting and landscape plans for review and approval by Spokane County and numerous State Agencies. R. A. Hanson Company is completing its contractual obligations to Price Development Company for Phase I of the project and is now awaiting confirmation from the purchaser that construction will commence on the shopping center at an early and prudent date so that we can complete construction of required roadways, utilities, and perimeter improvements. We have several other potential users for properties adjoining the shopping center site who are also interested in proceeding with development. -Although we have every confidence that Price Development Company will proceed with the shopping center, we note major changes in the lending practices of financial institutions and a weakening national economy which could effectively delay or reduce the scale of the project, even though Spokane, by comparison, currently enjoys a robust economy. This is evidenced by continued expansion of retail shopping facilities within the City of Spokane. We are hopeful that our Spokane economy will remain strong for the foreseeable future and have been encouraging Price Development Company to initiate construction of the $40 million shopping center complex. Not only would such a project insure the continued expansion of our local economy, but it would also contribute almost $600,000 in local sales tax revenues (County, Criminal Justice, and Transit) during construction, not to mention the increased real estate tax base upon completion of construction. Since negotiations and necessary plan approvals are apparently complete, it is now time for Spokane County to extend an invitation to Price Development Company to become a vital part of our community, in the same manner that invitations were extended to Hewlett— Packard and to Boeing by the Board of County Commissioners. Our firm is already looking ahead to'the Phase II portion of the project; however, many of the Conditions of Approval still remain vague and subject to interpretation. Although R. A. Hanson Company is willing to pay its "fair share" for impacts created by the development, we should not be expected to provide improvements which directly benefit someone else at our expense. Following the issuance of building permits and initiation of construction by Price Development Company, our firm intends to return and continue negotiations with the Spokane County Engineers, WSDOT, and other agencies to resolve Phase II issues. For your information, we have prepared a comparative table of conditions and requirements imposed on similar shopping center proposals in the Spokane Valley. Although there may be certain justifications to the manner in which such conditions evolved, we note that Sullivan Park Center has, in effect, borne a disproportionate share of community responsibilities and special conditions. We will need proper resolution of the outstanding issues if - our project is to remain competitive with other approved sites, including those in the City of Spokane which have contributed virtually nothing to the resolution of certain offsite impacts. .Sincerely, R. A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. 6. a. 2/ R. A. Hanson President RAH:532:tjw Sponsor/ Number/ Year Valley Mall Assoc. - 142A -77 1977 Sullivan Park Center ZE- 180 -78 1986 Cafaro Co. ZE -69A -81 1987 COMPARISON OF VALLEY SHOPPING CENTER CONDITIONS Size /Location Planning Conditions Approx. 50 Ac Sullivan & Mission Future hearing on detailed site plan, SEPA review required Portion of 226 Ac 1. Landscape Plan /208, perimeters 1 1 -90 & Sullivan 2. Sign restrictions, lighting & signing plan 3. Special landscape median for 2 Indiana extension 4. Park dedication near river 3 5. Dedication of landscaping near interchng. 6. Phasing of development 97 Ac 1. Landscape plan /208, perimeters 1 -90 at Liberty 2. Sign restrictions, lighting & signing Lake plan 3. Special 10' landscape strip on road County Engineers' Conditions 1. Imprvs. to adjoining Sullivan /signals 2. Imprvs. north to 1 -90 3. Irnprvs. to adjoining Broadway 4. Traffic revisions to streets adjacent to Broadway 5. Possible imprvs to Broadway east of project & Flora Rd. south to Sprague County Utilities 1. Interim sewer authorized 2. UUD agreement for sewers . Construction of Indiana from Sullivan/ 1. Interim sewer authorized signals to Pines 2. UUD agreement for . Construction of new ramps @ Sullivan sewers & 1 -90 . Future construction /participation of Evergreen Interchange, connection to Indiana, connection to Mission - 4. Participation in Imprvs. to Sullivan south to Sprague 5. Possible participation in imprvs. to Evergreen south to Sprague . 6. Possible imprvs. to Pines interchange & Indiana 7. Possible extension of Evergreen north • to Trent 8 Phasing & continued traffic studies to determine future needs 9. Extenstion of Indiana between Sullivan & Flora 10. Cooperation with WSDOT on Evergreen interchange design 1. Floodplain controls 2 imprvs. to Liberty Lake Rd adjacent site /signals 3. Imprvs. to Liberty Lake Rd. 300' south of site 1. Connection to Liberty Lake Sewer Dia Sponsor/ Number/ Year Celaro Co. (cont.) Size /Location WinVest Development S. of U-City ZE- 50A -87 Expansion of 1989 University City Planning Conditions 1. Landscape plan /208, perimeters 2. Submittal of Waster Development Plan' to Planning Director 3. Cooperation with STA 4. Sign restrictions; lighting & signing plan County Engineers' Conditions County Utilities 4. imprvs. to future Liberty Lake Mall Blvd. to Henry Rd. 5. Participate in extension of Liberty Lake Mali Blvd. to Appleway /Greenacres 1 -90 interchange 6. Possible imprvs. to Henry Rd., Sprague Ave. 7. Traffic signal imprvs. 8. Participate in Harvard Rd. & Greenacres Rd. /I -90 imprvs. 1. Signal on Felts Rd. 1. Connection to County 2. Vacation of Dartmouth Rd. sewer 3. Dedications along University Rd. 4. Impvs. of University adjacent ownership 5. Sprague Ave. turn lanes, signals - ;CS 1 1 12 01 Z8.254c. 07.5 LOT7 /323 ••• L 07 3_3.75 4c . ••• uTEFOIRE. M.AP IS WTJUE )1C CONICAL AREA rxurr WiTICN ARMS CODED PRIMARY SURFACE._ tc: 1. -"" ;1-1' -1 .1 5' 1. _.....- ....-- L 07 J2754c ." B-3 1 LOnv 35 /OAc. • Q S . 1 au -78 c 4° t• I L079 /0.7 MSS7---Hcr----"-+ Lika • c • 4 - 24 - 42 c c • z 2 /2 a N %-; • IP sea s„.„ r,.. - •S•t NN © AtDne 116 -lg® — `-' ` -�! rr _ CC X34 -2.4 -42. 1KK F- - bra Jr c t •7Y J • dlP` SQL' HAl L, 0 bt-Rc- < >> u n narLittfgrI oNA l Seco •fr.0 u QAl l •.A 10/01 '93 08 :16) •ID :WSDOT DISTRICT 6 JUL 1`J 11 93 17 :60 h'.H.HH Mr. Leonard Cash July, 19, 1993 ' Page 2 ,/� �J E! i . t � , .i ' R.A. ;Manson Preeide+nt RAH /41b. , FAX PAGE 3 P.d' When !we worked with the County to apply for a TIB grant, :they, told Ass that the value of the land north of the freeway the. interchange will be built, the extension of.Everereen Road to Indiana Avenue, the cost Indiana Avenue and the value of the e .land it oc'Cupiee was note part of the valuation focmela for the TIB grant. 1. Wait Horning and.I disagreed with that and went to Olympia to meet with the TI$ director and.otber.pereennel. At' that.confeeenco they confirmed that our, view was correct, but the'. • County didn't include it - in •the TIB-request. • . 1 . . . We first had to get the concept approval from the FHWA, This concept approval has..been dif'fiau.lt beaauaee of the County'.a, request to include the Evergreen connection and that taused the interchango to meved.a couple of hundred yards setae. .This.wae•.. required co that Evergreen could be connected down the high bank 'and too the iuriggotion water. eyetsm. The interchange would then b© P.osotod o'bi Lowe than one mile freom Sullivan end. the FHWA ' doors not.nerma.11y like interchangea..leee than one mile.. This, . howevee, was approved in :preetimina,ry de,,oign, The next esteip wee' deign and aceees. planning .wprk fox this hearing and nppeoval for th© Tvergreen interchange portion of the . improvementc.whichthe R.A. Kansan Company and Price Development.: 'Company, out of Salt Lake City, Utah,. have paid for with total. cooto to date exceeding $200`,000. '• To d©to, very little government money hen been spent; other than time Sor personnel involved et various meetings; i In elooin6„ 8 would like to hmphasize.that we.heve. alwayo been willLig toIpay our.f©ir.ehere and, to.data, have paSd nearly all the Gnotp involvec4 including the.eaxpenee of.the bearing on ,Yuly!8p 39,89. ' . • We believe 1hsover, that the scope of ,the,project and the otabetantiolty increased benefito the interchange will provide roqu ee a now evaluation of the distribytion of the total costs oan a entribtti*na Made from 611 soursea; • ' Sincerely,' • 1 ' R.A. 'RAW$ON !COMPANY, INC. RECEIV 0 JU'L,1 1993 L; `C. 10/61 '93 08 r 14 ID: WSDOT DISTRICT 6. - - , FAX : 509 - 456 -3089 R. A, a1AN$ON COMPANY, INC, PO, Box 74o0,. Spokane, WA 90207 -0400 U.9,A o (600) 487.0770 ' rest 328474 u Telofox ,(609) 488-0212 93 1 Nbr.of pad ..� (509) 44089 f July 19 :.1993 Mr. ,Leonard Cash Washin t n State of.Trane ortation' N. 2714• Mayfair 8pokAne,IWA 99207 !Door Mr: Dentin PAGE For , the record, 1 would like to go into .the, history of the . Evowgrefl tntorcharige;project ;a...little "b.it.' in Jan'uaxy, 1980, the. DeBartolo ,company;.,,You Ohio, who •. are ;thta 'number one tdevelopers :'in the 13. B. , . optioned bur Sullivan .property;•to build ea chopping center. ,. ,Fhie woo :before the•Sullivan road interchange was rebuilt and .belartolo planned to build.en. ;auto- urban .intarchenge :which; , ' according to.Debartola,..ocdupi,es loop spsee.and.handlea ho trof ?Sts than.a diamond., ''his ;was not 'approved by the WSW offffico. ip Olympia and 'DeBartolo went away. Ito continued,t,orking , on..the •p and various approvals: and; •esaonig tho;way, we got lucky because the railroad property was •cbandouod,'which allowod.a good deal .,more.accees..to•Sullivan.: rood• . At; that•.timer. we had pr+op.osed,buildingra 'simple . . ineornhahga.at Evertgreen which would consist..ofg.two- lane', 'oVo aob LMtd a ein`gle -lane diamond. 'We offered to build $t Of our aixpenOm and design.it psi that it.could be expanded into a ..0u12''d9 ahtpnd .interchange , at ; a ; later.date, when :the State fait It WOO uCecobery. AC that.flme, tho, Oounty Engineering DeparLAent,,under Hob:; . Turnas,,:'.aid not :ev.en :want to think about including.the,Evergroon . Road ,00iinoction' :to .the :cotta .to. the County., :Ai t'&i o went by we ,were .advised by Various WSDOT peraonn'el : that • ;eieuld; 6t hard to' gat; approval from the FHWA .for an interchange to .`aaf:?ve).:'onlyA ®hopping center •and, that':we should ;design . i't',so •thbt • Eveggreen Road .could to eonnacted Arid .that' we, should, solicit .cupport•Et'om.the County. ,The County cooperated, but •Boon Wanted. 'tho 'doveloper to bear most .of ,the, cost, of .building a : full ; • .interact�ga to Evergreen and widening :zvergreen•to five Lanes,.' t,ll 'th&vay..to..Sprague Avonuo.:.,The,.price tag of that total erodact now..eotimated to• bn $14+ million,: including ROW:" aCQut itions. R.E C iuL 1 L: C. JUL 08 '93 10:01 R.A.HANSON P.1 /1 July 7, 1993 ' TO: Mike Frucci Gary Kennaly Jim Keller Walt Horning Tom Mulkey' FROM: Dave Carlsen RE: Evergreen Interchange Area Property Owner' I have contacted all of the property owners or their representatives :directly affected by right of way; requirements for the current alignment of the proposed Evergreen Interchange to Interstate Highway 90. In my discussions with them, I said that the hearings scheduled for Thursday July 8, 1993 were to present the proposed design and access componenteiof the interchange: and testimony from the publiciregarding those issues. I said that no timetable had been established for the.• project and that:therefore no timetable had been :set for right of way acquisition.' I told them that I was available for discussion and consideration of any proposals to acquire all or a portion 'of their property. I told them that the hearing was not geared to provide further answers to right of way acquisition questions. The names and phone numbers of those contacted follows. None of them expressed concerns to me beyond right of way; acquisition :and the effect of timing on them except Mr. Cronkhite;. He expressed additional concerns regarding the size and location of the.right of way, the design presented versus any alternatives that had been considered;.:. and the nature of the conection!to Evergreen Road and the impact of plans for widening Evergreen Road at the connection and to the South. He said he would be at the hearing and ask questions on those and possibly other issues. I told'him that I understood there would be.WSDOT and County; representatives at the hearing.:' Steve Backman 487 1651 (Atty for Gary Austin', 928 7669) Gwen Meloher ; i 924 6805 Kevin CronkhitejH922 2 Richard Adams .::926.5394 Di7C: ols MEMO Washington State Dept of Transportation Spokane County Planning & Traffic Engr Forsgren Associates Interwest Group Price Development Company OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer J. C. Lenzi District Administrator Washington State Dept. of Transportation N. 2714 Mayfair Spokane, WA 99207 -2090 Dear Mr. Lenzi: GWIVevergrikc W. 1026 Broadway Ave. A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director July 8, 1993 Re: SR 90 Evergreen Interchange Design and Access Hearing On June 23, 1993, the County Engineer briefed the Board of Spokane County Commissioners on the proposed SR 90- Evergreen Road Interchange Project. After a public hearing on June 29, 1993, the Board approved the 1994 -1999 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program containing the SR 90- Evergreen Road Interchange Project developing over the 1994 -1996 time frame. Spokane County concurs with the proposed interchange design and necessary access controls on Evergreen Road and Mission Avenue to be presented at the Public Hearing on July 8, 1993. Very truly yours, nal. t. Hormann, County Engineer Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 FAX (509) 456 -4715 VICINITY MAP SR -90 / EVERGREEN INTERCHANGE EVERGREEN ROAD SPRAGUE AVENUE TO INDIANA AVENUE Project Location 1 , N..ad• PP r ALUM /NUJ/ " ROLLING ?TILL S' a a S. •roGa New Shopp Center 'WAN nri _.- 741 •_ ; • ] r SPOK, NEWSTP.. • New Commercial Development s- �^r a • 7 I ...:-:.:Jr it r ' �.,\ " -' Lt i' Evergreen Road - Sprague Avenue to Indiana, 1.35 miles. Evergreen Road is a principal arterial between 32nd Avenue and Mission Avenue; a two -lane 24 feet wide light bituminous roadway within a 60 feet right -of -way. Commercial development north of SR- 90 requires construction of an interchange of Evergreen Road with SR -90, a new Evergreen connection between Mission Avenue and Indiana Avenue and a basic five lane roadway from Sprague Avenue to Mission Avenue with additional turning lanes at signalized intersections at Indiana, Mission, Broadway and Sprague Avenue, and a partial interchange at Mission. Present traffic volumes north of Sprague are 7,000 ADT and at Mission 2,200 ADT; year 2010 traffic with full commercial development in place is over 35,000 ADT north of SR -90 and near 30,000 ADT south of Mission. Estimated total cost $12,000,00. - - -= -tee Ar s? i Washmgton,State L,,L.. ifir-Department of Transportation Duane Berentson , :T• • Secretary of Transportation Ron Hormann S pokane County.Engineer N' 81 °a Spoicane, WA" 99201 Dear Mr. Hormann: June 8, 1993 RE: Evergreen I/C Project The design /access hearing for the Evergreen Interchange project is scheduled :for July 8, 1993. The design hearing portion will combine an open house format with the opportunity for: testimony to be give in a separate room. A formal presentation will be made for the access hearing portion. By this letter we are requesting that yourself and /or key staff persons who can answer questions regarding the Evergreen Road widening project be present at this open house and hearing as these projects are in close proximity. Also, an informational meeting involving the developer and WSDOT is scheduled for June 21 at 9:00 am in the Large Conference Room at District 6 WSDOT. The purpose is to familiarize those who will attend the hearing with the project and the hearing format. „We .. would like you and /or your staff to attend this informational meeting if possible. Please contact Mike Frucci at 456 -2864 with any questions regarding this information. Sincerely, 4 :tDisiacte j _ ,•. +^ 2714 North Mayfair St ,. ,,.Spokane; WA 99207 -� (509) 456-3000 . Fak (509) 456 -3089 Larry Chatterton Assistant DA for Development ;MP JUN 1 1 1993 STBMANE GUIN y ENGINEER NOTICE OF DESIGN AND ACCESS HEARING You are hereby notified that on the 28th day of May, 1993, the State Design Engineer proposed a plan for the establishment of certain fully controlled limited access facilities on a portion of I- 90, in the vicinity of Evergreen Road more particularly: Between Sta. 340 +00 and Sta. 375 +00 as shown on sheet 1 of 1 sheets of the limited access plan entitled "SR 90, EVERGREEN INTERCHANGE, MP 290.69 to MP 291.35, SPOKANE COUNTY" The proposed interchange will provide additional access to developing residential areas south of I- 90, as well as proposed commercial developments north of I- 90 (Sullivan Park Center). The proposed interchange will also relieve present and future congestion and improve traffic safety at the existing Pines Road and Sullivan Road Interchanges. The proposed Evergreen Interchange will provide additional access from I- 90 to the south along Evergreen Road and provide important links from the south across from I- 90 to Indiana with additional connections to Pines and Sullivan northbound. Finally, the new interchange will provide a direct connection from Sullivan Park Center and adjacent commercial/industrial developments to I- 90. In accordance with section 47.52 of the Revised Code of Washington and Section 128, Title 23, United States Code and any acts supplemental thereto, as a owner whose property is affected by the highway which it is proposed to be established as a limited access highway facility, as a county or town or as an interested citizen, you are hereby notified that a hearing as to design proposals and also a separate hearing concerning limited access proposals will be held on Thursday, July 8, 1993 at the Red Lion Motor Inn - Spokane located at 1100 North Sullivan Road, Veradale, Washington. The Design portion of the hearing will be an open house format begining at 5:00 p.m. and ending at 7:00 p.m. The formal Access hearing will start at 7:30 p.m. will be conducted to explain the project impacts to effected properties and the access to these properties. Testimony will be taken after the formal presentation. Those who attend the design portion of the hearing will be given an overview of the project. If they have questions specific to their own concerns, WSDOT officials will be on hand to answer questions one -on -one. When each participant is satisfied that his or her questions have been answered, they may present testimony either verbally or in writing to the court reporter. Testimony will be structured on a one -to -one basis as well. although participants are welcome to listen to each other's testimony. Individuals should anticipate the process taking about one hour of their time. Written testimony will also be accepted at the hearing or can be sent to Mike Frucci, WSDOT, District 6 Office at North 2714 Mayfair, Spokane, WA 99207. All written statements received by July 19, 1993 will be considered by the project administrators and will be included in the formal hearing record. Interpreters can be provided for persons with hearing impairments. Braille or taped information for people with visual impairments can also be provided. Please contact Jim Keller, Forsgren Associates/P.A., 545 Benjamin Lane, Suite 185, Boise, Idaho 83704. telephone (208) 375 -1992 by June 28, 1993, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. The hearing site is accessible to the physically handicapped. Plans. maps, a response to the National and State Environmental Policy Acts checklist, and other pertinent information about this project will be on display at the hearing together with written views received as a result of coordinated planning with interested agencies, officials, groups and persons. Department personnel will be present to discuss tentative right of way acquisition, construction schedules, relocation assistance programs, and to answer questions about the project. Information mentioned above concerning the project may be reviewed prior to the hearing by contacting Mike Frucci, WSDOT, District 6 Office at North 2714 Mayfair, Spokane, WA 99207 It is the purpose of this notice and of the hearing which it announces to provide for the fullest exchange of information possible regarding the effect on the community of the project being considered through full discussion and examination of the planning to date. This purpose is in consonance with and pursuant to RCW 47.52, the Federal Highway Act (Title 23 U.S.C., 101 et seq. 128) and amendments thereto. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AT LIMITED ACCESS HIGHWAY FACILITY HEARING TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Any statement, objection or counter - proposal you wish to have considered must be submitted by you or someone representing you at the hearing. Your statement may be oral or written. If your statement is written, it should be presented at the hearing to the Examiner conducting the hearing or to the State's attorney. As a courtesy to interested citizens, a copy of the Findings and Order will be furnished to all persons filing a Notice of Appearance prior to or at the hearing even though some may not properly be parties to the hearing. The Acceptance of a Notice of Appearance and the furnishing of a copy of the Findings and Order, does not necessarily mean that the recipient is recognized to be a proper party to the hearing. Pursuant to the above, this party hereby files an appearance and requests a copy of the Findings and Order for the hearing to be held for the designation of limited access on: STATE ROUTE 90, Evergreen Road Interchange, on July 8, 1993 at 7:30 p.m. in the Red Lion Motor Inn - Spokane, located at 1100 North Sullivan Road, Veradale, Washington. PARTY BEING REPRESENTED: Name Address City State Zip REPRESENTED BY: (if same as PARTY BEING REPRESENTED, leave blank) *Name Address City State Zip Title (Attorney, Corporate Officer, Partner, etc.) *If you are representing more than one person, please submit an appearance form for each person represented. Additional blanks will be available at the hearing. Washington State Department of Transportation District 6 North 2714 Mayfair Street ' Spokane. Washington 99207 -2090 (509) 456-3000 Fax (509) 456 -3089 Mr. James Keller Forsgren Associates, P.A. Project Manager / Representative for R.A. Hanson and Price Development 545 Benjamin Lane, Suite 185 Boise, ID 83704 ' RE: SR 90 Evergreen Road Interchange Project Access Control Along Evergreen Rd. Dear Jim: On September 29, 1992 a meeting between Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) headquarters staff, district 6 staff, and Forsgren Associates (FA) was held in Olympia. As a result of that meeting Mr. John Milton (WSDOT Headquarters Traffic Department) has worked with FA representatives and has analyzed the effects of and need for access control along Evergreen Road in association with the proposed interchange of Evergreen Road and SR 90. Mr. Milton has reviewed the Corridor Capacity and Operational Analysis report forwarded by FA. District 6 received the requirements for access control resulting from this analysis in a memo dated December 18, 1992. The following is a summary: o Allow no left turn ingress or egress to properties along this portion of Evergreen Road. o Allow right turn ingress and egress between the Hanson property and Evergreen Road at a point which is a minimum of 450 feet north of the SR 90 westbound ramps. o Allow right turn ingress only between the Spokane Galleria property and Evergreen Road at a point which is 500 feet north of the SR 90 westbound ramps. The following two items are strongly recommended as they will improve the flow of traffic within the parking area and through the signal at Indiana and Evergreen: o Provide for a storage area within the parking facility of both properties. This should extend a minimum of 200 feet from Evergreen Road. This is based on expected queues during the peak season. o Modeling of the traffic signal at Evergreen and Indiana indicates that benefits are possible with minor revisions to the proposed channelization. This would include rechannelizing at the signal from the proposed through, shared, and auxiliary turn lane to single through lanes and double turn lanes. Pagel Duane Berentson Secretary of Transportation December 23, 1992 DEC 2 4 199 . I`• S "rtyt:A- lL'itYEltGiaEER Revisions to the Access Report and Access Hearing Plan which reflect the above requirements will need to be made prior to scheduling an Access Hearing. Please contact me at 456 -3000 if you have any questions concerning the contents of this letter. Please submit revisions to the Access Report and Access Hearing Plans to Mike Frucci for coordination with headquarters for approval. cc: R.A. Hanson Walt Horning Ross Kelly (Spokane County) Sincerely; Larry Chatterton Assistant District Administrator for Development Page2 eg'/ll(et e‘ cQ e//. ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW Mr. Jerry Sims Spokane County Engineer's Office N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 DMB /slm cc: R.A. Hanson Company Mike Phillips November 5, 1990 Re: Roadway Drainage Easement Very tr ; yours, DR' is . BODKER Attorney at Law S. 1401 GRAND BLVD.. SUITE 203 NORTH (509) 456-5100 FAX: (509) 456 -5114 I have reviewed the proposed drainage easement that your office has prepared for the execution of R.A. Hanson Company. The only portion of this document that I have a question with concerns the third paragraph regarding a release of any and all liability to Spokane County, its officers and employees for any damages as a result this drainage easement. Since we are voluntarily granting the easement to Spokane County, I don't see how we or our successors could have any claim for inverse condemnation, but if you want to leave that portion of the wording in the document, I suppose we can live with it. However, I am cautious about the other portion of this paragraph which purports to waive any other possible damages whatsoever which may result out of the storm drainage. Since the landowner is to maintain this drainage area, I cannot see that the County would have very much exposure for damages to anyone, including the landowner, but I don't want to absolutely waive any claim that the landowner may have against the County for any future action arising out of or attributable to the storm drainage. Would you please review this with Mike Dempsey and then get back to me with your thoughts. Thank you. RECEIVED NOV 0 6 1990 � a ' ENG;CiE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Spokane County, Washington DRAINAGE EASEMENT Parcel Nos. 45132.9040, 45113.9026 45114.9031, 45141.9170 The Grantor(s) R. A. Hanson Company, Inc., of the County of Spokane, State of Washington, for and in consideration of Mutual Benefits, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grants to Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, an Easement over, under, upon and across the hereinafter described lands situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washington: A strip of land 10 feet in width adjoining the northerly right of way line of Indiana Avenue across Lot 2 , Block 2, Sullivan Park Center as recorded in Book 19 of Plats, Pages 25 and 26; and A strip of land 10 feet in width adjoining the southerly right of way line of Indiana Avenue across Lot 2, Block 1, Sullivan Park Center as recorded in Book 19 of Plats, Pages 25 and 26. All located in Sections 11, 13 and 14, Township 25, Range 44 East, W.M. in Spokane County, Washington. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, as shown hereinabove are for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted. The County of Spokane is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all drainage easements adjacent to the public right of way. The property owner shall maintain the drainage swale with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage swale as indicated by the approved plans. The Grantor(s) hereby releases Spokane County, and all its officers, employees, and agents from any responsibility or liability for any damage whatsoever including inverse condemnation by or to any and all persons or property arising out of or in any way incident to or attributable to the storm drainage within said Easement. The Easement described hereinabove is to and shall run with the land. No modification of the boundaries of said Easement can be made without the prior approval of Spokane County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this instrument to be executed by its proper officers and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed this day of , 1990. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) Ss hanson /sample jp By R. A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. President On this day of , 1990, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared R. A. Hanson to me known to be the PRESIDENT of R. A. Hanson" Company, Inc., the Corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said Corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he authorized to execute the said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year first above written. Notary Public In and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane. R. A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. January 9, 1991 Washington State Department of Transportation District 6 North 2714 Mayfair Street Spokane, WA 99205 -2090 Attn: Mr. Keith A. Metcalf, P.E. Assistant Project Development Engineer Subj: Evergreen . Interchange WSDOT letter of Dec. 26, 1990 Dear Keith; P.O. Boa 7400. Spokane. WA 99207 -0400 U S A :,509) 457-0770 Telex 326474 Telefax 5091 466 -0212 I am in receipt of your letter dated Dec. 26, 1990 and have discussed its continence with Price Development Co. We agree that the new design for the connection between Evergreen and Mission must have Spokane County comments prior to finalization of the plan. We also agree with your perception regarding funding of the project. We cannot however, totally agree that the project is to ONLY serve the Developers. The interchange will certainly relieve the congestion of the local Streets in the area, as well as help smooth out traffic flows through the Pines and Sullivan Interchanges. ` Even though the project may be low on the priority list at this time. We trust that the Interchange will qualify for Interstate participation when the time is ready to construct the facility. We hope that the County and Washington State Department of Transportation will continue to explore all avenues of revenues to aid in the funding of the project. Sincerely, R. A. HANSON COMPANY INC. VkAn Marks ject Manager Ross Kelley, Spokane County L. Wayne Shepherd, P.E. Forsgren Associates, P.A. P. Eric Davis, Price Development Company Walt Horning RECEIVE • JAN 1 71991 I SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SULLIVAN PROPERTY SUMMARY TOTAL PROPERTY: 249 Acres * Acres given to County, State, and County parks to date: 26 Acres * Of the 26 acres, 13 went to County parks * 82 1/2 acres sold to Price Development Company * Leaving 141 1/2 acres, most of which cannot be used until certain improvements, as requested by the County, are in place. OPER USE SQ FT GROSS SALES SALES TAX VALUE PROP TAX JOBS Retail Center 1,348,000 269,600,000 21,568,000 87,350,400 1,668,392 1685 Bus. 390,000 130,000,000 10,400,000 30,326,400 Park Ind. 800,000 280,000,000 22,400,000 57,024,000 1,089,158 2000 Park Hotel/ 300 Rms 26,400,000 Motel 2,640,000 25,920,000 CONST CONST COST JOBS 80,880,000 741 579,234 1300 28,080,000 257 52,800,000 484 495,072 300 24,000,000 220 706,000,000 57,008,000 200,620,800 38;31 5285 185,760,000 1703 LAND VALUE (8,307,712 x 3.50 /SF) 29,076,992 229,697,792 PROPERTY TAX BASIS PER $1000 PER YEAR State General Fund Roads Library School Fire 3.61 1.95 2.20 0.65 7.85 2.84 829,209 447,911 505,335 149,304 1,803,128 652,342 Total Tax 19.10 4,387,228 GENERAL NOTES ON ASSUMPTIONS: 1. All assumptions are based on 1992 dollars. 2. Construction jobs are estimated to be 55% of construction costs using a $30 /hr labor rate and a 50 wk /yr; 40 hrs /wk. 3. Information has been gathered from various sources as noted under each heading. 4. Property tax is based on 1.91% of value; Value = Construction Cost plus Sales Tax. 5. Sales Tax - 8%. T.Z.B. FUNDING SCENARIOS FOR EVERGREEN RD. IMPROVEMENTS Scenarios Totals 515,000,000 $15,000,000 $15,000,000 $15,000,000 $15,000,000 Developer 4,800,000 6,300,000 7,050,000 7,800,000 8,800,000 County 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 State 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 T.I.B. 9,000,000 7,500,000 6,750,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 T.I.B. Match % 60% 50% 45% 40% 33% Scenario Totals $12,000,000 512,000,000 512,000,000 512,000,000 $12,000,000 Developer 3,600,000 4,800,000 5,400,000 6,000,000 6,800,000 County 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 State 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 T.I.B. 7,200,000 6,000,000 5,400,000 4,800,000 4,000,000 T.Z.B. Match % T.I.H. Match % 60% 50% 45% 40% 33% $10,000,000 4,800,000 600,000 600,000 4,000,000 40% 1 Scenari Totals 510,000 000 $10,000 000 $10,000 000 Developer 2,800,000 3,800,000 4,300,000 County 600,000 600,000 600,000 State 600,000 600,000 600,000 T.I.B. 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,500,000 60% 50% 45% $10,000 000 5,466,667 600,000 600,000 3,333,333 33% General Notes: ASSUMPTIONS FOR SULLIVAN PARK 1. All assumptions are based on 1992 dollars 2. Construction costs are estimated to be based on 55% of construction costs using $30 /hour labor rate and a 50 week (40 hours /week) basis 3. Information has been gathered from various sources as noted under each heading 4 Property Tax based on 1.91% on Value; Value - Cost plus Sales Tax 5. Sales Tax - 8% HOTEL /MOTEL SITE (Provided by: Sheraton Hotel) Construction - $75,000 to $85,000 per room ($80,000 used) Income - .1% of cost at 65% Occupancy break -even Employees (includes food and beverage) - 1 per room 10% Tax - includes 8% sales tax and 2% room & board tax BUSINESS AND OFFICE PARK (Provided by: Spokane Industrial Park) $ 72 /SF for office with equipment $ 66 /SF for manufacturing with equipment $ 40 /SF for warehouse (includes parking, paving, and landscaping) 1 job per 400 SF of industrial space 1 job per 300 SF of office space Income - $140,000 per industrial park employee $100,000 per business park employee Sales Tax - 8% Property Tax - 1.91% Property Value - 3.50 SF on 195.2 net useable acres (Price 82.56) (Donated roads & parks 36.63) Total original - 231.83 acres $29,760,192 times 1.91% = $568,420 Property Tax RETAIL CENTER (Provided by: Spokane Valley Mall /Price Development) Sales - $200 /SF of space 8 major anchors & 200 other stores 1 employee per 800 SF Cost - $60 /SF • I • 1 i • s M • SPONSOR !OOMBER/ YEAR Valley Mall Assoc. ZE.1421 -77 William Hain Corp, .: PE- 1222 -76 •:4E- 202 -78 NOTE - In June, 1990 as conditions for an Spokane Nall Associates ZE- IPO -78 • 81 (Ranson Properties) • t Su/liven Park Cerner ZE -teD78 Stir/ LOCATION ACW'cx SO Ac Su!I.vtn & Mission • • 984 acres Liberty Lake (Homestead) h90 & LLIlrran 97 Ac • . fact at Liberty Lake ylnVest Development S. of U- ity • County Engineers extension of time 226 acres I - to Sullivan (Sullivan Park) ZE30A -87 .t Expansion to 2. tIoi-I• University City 3. 4. COHYARISCN OF VALLEY DEVELOPME.f PL\nNIGC CONDITIONS Enure, brnnrr On r; tfat me plan. SEP.a :, v -_,. i.- :� : .•. 1. Specific Development Plan 2. Normal '208' runoff mitigation measures and landscaping 3. Compliance with mitigating measures identified in EIS Indiana extension 4. Park dedication near river 5. Dedication of landscaping near intercnng 6. Phasing of development 1. Landscape pan /269, perimeters 2. Sign restrictions. lighting & signing clan 3. Special 10' landscape stop on read Landscape pan /208. perirmlers Submittal of *Master Oevelopinent Plan' to Plarnmg evertor Ca with STA Sign resmcnons; belting & signing Pan r CONUITIO.` :S (IF APPPOVAI. COUNTY ii.`It :IPEERS ' COPPl TI DES I :.nr,s :0 a. iU ra $uLrran /t ,r. t. ... - s. norm:, l''1 1 a:,rvs :o a: ; cmnq Urc.tl'Anv 4 i :.rte riadorui ID streets aaile : t :0 din.: i'A.ly 5. Pnfziia :-lbws 10 el(1.1 .vav Past 01 prq� & Fln.a Hd soon 10 Srlprua ... :T :] ?KY a Ch:nice UL.: tistetmtln for . 1. Phased Construction of rest- 1. All roads to be curbed and 1. Public sewer and dencial, multi - family, local paved. Facer sys ceay. business/office and restricted 2 Additional traffic analysis Industrial use. to be done by Developer with 2. Public sewer system and water each Phase to determine re- system required. lured traffic Impacts and 3. approval Subject to Suh j a of road appropriate mitigation measures. system by County Engineers. 3. Realign, widen and Improve exist- Additional conditions ing Mission Ave. and Liberty Lake per Excen- i elan of Time Request dated 9- 21 -50. w Drins ive ofn. rom 1 -90 to 400' South of 1. Adequate assurance that needed • improvements to 1 -90 can be 4. State and County agree to actively investigate and pursue all sources funded as phases are completed. of funding, for highway and road Improvements needed to adequately service the proposal, hut Sponsnr must fund the same or delay con- struction if said funding 1s not available. 5. State may require County to par- ticipate In highway related Im- provements, based on traffic volume. 6. 20' landscaped strip ad)o /ntnq all roadways In the industrial areas; other ladscapting also required. required a storm eater service area, lighted pathways and Improvements to Molter Road i request by the Homestead Development. 1. Recommended denial of the zone change because Engineers felt adequate access could not be guaranteed. Hearing Examiner Committee approved zone change over Engineer's objections. Portion at 226 Ac 1. Landscape Plan /263 perimeters 1. Constmcton of Indiana from Sullivan/ 2. Sign restrictorss, lighting & signing pan signals to Pines 3. Special lar41scape mecian tor 2. Construction o1 new ramps @ Sultan 3. Future consauction /panidpancn d Evergreen Interchange, connection to Indiana. connection to Mission 4. Participation in imprvs. t0 Shciron south to Sprague 5. Passible participation in imprvs to Evergreen south to Sprague 6. Possible imprvs to Pines interchange & Indiana 7 Possido eaension of Evergreen north to Trent 8. Phasing & continued tragic studies to determine future needs 9. Fxtenstlon of Indiana between SUI HaI1 &Flora 10.Cooperavon with WSDOT on Evergreen interchange Design 1. Floodpain controls 1. Connection to libeity 2. Imprvs. to Liberty Lake Rd adjacem Lake Sewer Gist - sue /signals 3. Imprvs. to Liberty Lake Rd. 300' south al site 4. Imprvs. to future Liberty Lake Mall 81-.O. to Henry Rd. 5. Partcipve in tr tension of Liberty Lake Mall Elvd. to Appleway /Greeracres 1.03 inteternnge 6. PossNe imprvs. to Henry Rd- Sprague Ave. 7. Traffic signal imprvs. a Pamopate in Harvard Rd. & Greenacres Rd. /I.93 imprvs. 1. Signal on Felts Pd. 2. Vacahon of Dartmouth Rd. 3. Dediouons along University Rd 4. Imprvs. of UnivernM adlaccnt ownership 5. Sprague Ave. turn lanes. sgnals l.oi ::1TY UTILITIES 1. Irlervn sewer authorized 2. UL'D agreemerr lcs sewers 1. Connection to County sewer . ■ 1. Allowed on - site sewage system for land east of Sullivan Road 2. Public sewer was to be brought to Land lying West of Sullivan Road by C'LID Agreement TGM:ks SPONANC COUNTY COURT NOUSE Attachment Iran PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99260 TO: !/Bob McCann, Spokane County Engineers Jim Legat, Spokane County Utilities Steve Horobiowski, Planning Department Doug Adams, Planning Department FROM: Thomas G. Mosher, Shorelines Administrator DATE: August 21, 1985 SUBJECT: Review of Preliminary Final Supplemental EIS for Hanson Properties Sullivan Center Project Hanson Properties'. consultant:. has prepared the attached preliminary document for our review. They have the difficult task of responding as if they were the County agency. It is our responsibility to see that the document reflects Spokane County's point of view on each issue. Therefore, I have chosen to use this preliminary review of a few days in order to assure that the document accurately reflects the County response to the various comments received as a result of circulation of the draft supplemental EIS. WoUTa C----- you please respond verbally or in writing to me no later than Thursday, August 29,with> any corrections or adjustment to the preliminary final supple - mental.EIS. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in making this process work. DEVELOPER /LOCAL O ORGANIZATION AND ADDRESS LOCAL AGENCY AND ADDRESS Spokane County North 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 AGREEMENT NUMBER S SECTION /LOCATION STATE ROUTE C CONTROL SECTION D DISTRICT D DESCRIPTION OF WORK SURETY BOND W WORK HOURS Washington State THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1991, between the STATE OF WASHINGTON, Department of Transportation, acting by and through the Secretary of Transportation, hereinafter called the "STATE,' and the above named organization, hereinafter called the "DEVELOPER," and the above named City or County, hereinafter called the "LOCAL AGENCY." WHEREAS, the DEVELOPER wishes to construct an intersection and /or related improvements within the STATE's rights of way, and WHEREAS, the STATE, LOCAL AGENCY, and DEVELOPER now wish to define responsibility for construction and maintenance of the proposed improvements. NOW THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed between the parties hereto as follows: 1. The STATE agrees to grant the DEVELOPER permission to construct the above described work within STATE right -of -way at the location described in Exhibit 'A,' attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. 2. The DEVELOPER agrees to construct the project as shown on Exhibit 'B, at 100 percent DEVELOPER expense and responsibility. Exhibit 'B' is attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. The responsibility of the DEVELOPER for proper performance, safe conduct, and adequate policing and supervision of the project shall not be lessened or otherwise affected by the STATE's approval of plans, specifications, or work, or by the presence at the worksite of the STATE's representative(s), or by compliance by the DEVELOPER with any requests or recommendations made by such representative (s). 3. My change of work from that shown on Exhibit 'B' must be approved by the STATE prior to beginning such work. 4. Prior to beginning of construction, a preconstruction conference shall be held with the STATE, LOCAL AGENCY, DEVELOPER, and the DEVELOPER's contractor. 5. Should the DEVELOPER choose to perform the work outlined herein with other than its own forces, a representative of the DEVELOPER shall be present at all times unless otherwise agreed to by the District Administrator. NI contact between the STATE and DEVELOPER's contractor shall be through the representative of the DEVELOPER. Where the DEVELOPER chooses to perform the work with its own forces, it may elect to appoint one of its own employees engaged in the construction as its representative. Failure to comply with this provision shall be grounds for restricting any further work by the DEVELOPER within the STATE right of way, until said requirement is met. The DEVELOPER at Its own expense, shall adequately police and supervise all work on the above described project by itself, its contractor(s), subcontractor(s), agent(s), and others, so as not to endanger or injure any person or property. 6. Work within the STATE right-of-way shall be restricted to the above specified hours and no work shall be allowed on the right-of-way Saturdays, Sundays or Holidays, unless otherwise authorized by the District Administrator. 7. In the construction and /or maintenance of this facility, the DEVELOPER shall comply with the 'Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways,' current edition. Any closures or restriction of the highway shall require a STATE approved traffic control plan. 8. All material and workmanship shall conform to the Washington State Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction, current edition, and shall be subject to inspection by the STATE. 9. MI disturbed right-of-way shall be seeded, fertilized, mulched and protected from erosion. 10. A surety bond in the amount shown above written by a surety company authorized to do business in the State of Washington, shall be furnished to the STATE, prior to the start of construction and shall remain in force until written release from the STATE. The STATE will recover from the DEVELOPER and its sureties such damages as the STATE may sustain by reason of the DEVELOPER's failure to comply with the provisions of this AGREEMENT. 11. The DEVELOPER shall obtain and keep in force for the duration of the work under this AGREEMENT, public liability and property damage insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner pursuant to Title 48 RCW. The STATE and LOCAL AGENCY shall be specifically named as an insured in a policy with the same company which insures the DEVELOPER or by an endorsement to an existing policy. The amount of coverage shall be not be less than a single limit of $1,000,000 for bodily injury, including death and property damage per occurrence. The DEVELOPER shall furnish the STATE proof of insurance prior to undertaking any work covered by this AGREEMENT. 12. The DEVELOPER shall reimburse the STATE for all actual direct and related indirect costs necessitated by this AGREEMENT. Such costs include, but are not limited to, plan review and inspection. 13. The STATE shall have ownership and control of the completed facility within the STATE right-of-way subject to final acceptance. The LOCAL AGENCY shall be responsible for continued ownership and maintenance of the completed .facility outside of STATE right-of-way. The LOCAL AGENCY agrees to maintain all access control pertinent to Indiana Avenue as shown in red on Exhibit 'A', sheet 3 of 3. AGREEMENT NO. UC 2842 DESCRIPTION OF WORK 1. Construct ramp sub -grade as shown in Exhibit "B," page 2 of 4 pages, and as staked by the DEVELOPER and checked by the STATE. 2. Construct untreated surfacing on ramps to the depths shown on Exhibit °B," page 3 of 4 pages. 3. Construct a 6:1 wedge of untreated crushed surfacing top course at the edge of all existing asphalt where widening has occurred. 4. Install new fencing (CHAIN LINK FENCE TYPE 3), see Standard Plan L -2 and L -3. This new fence will be installed as shown on Exhibit "B," page 2 of 4 pages. 5. Provide STATE approved .landscaping as outlined in the "Dedication" on the Final Plat. See Exhibit "B," page 4 of 4 pages. 6. Install temporary fencing and /or barricades as approved by the STATE to prevent use of the ramps until the STATE agrees to open them to traffic. 7. Construct a traffic signal system at the intersection of Sullivan Road and Indiana Avenue, along with roadway illumination system or systems on those roadways within the limited access areas, as indicated on Exhibit "B," page 1 of 4 pages of this Agreement. The traffic signal system shall be designed and installed to WSDOT standards and specifications. The signal controller shall be a Model 170 type. The controller shall be interconnected to the existing operating Model170 controller at the North ramp terminal of Sullivan Road and Interstate 90. The present interconnect between the Sullivan Road South ramp terminal and the North ramp terminal shall be modified to the extent that the North ramp terminal shall be the site of the master controller unit which shall be supplied as a portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement. All materials and equipment shall be approved and /or tested in the Materials Laboratory, Tumwater, with WSDOT, reserving the right to specify the type of equipment to be utilized. Cost associated with inspections and testing of same and training of WSDOT personnel to be reimbursed by this Agreement. WSDOT reserves the right to review and approve all aspects of signalization and illumination items under the Agreement. EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 3 pages 14. Any breach of the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT, or failure on the part of the DEVELOPER to proceed with due diligence and in good faith in the construction work provided for herein, shall subject this AGREEMENT to be cancelled and, at the option of the STATE, may require the DEVELOPER to remove all or part of the facilities constructed hereunder at the DEVELOPER's sole expense. 15. The DEVELOPER shall indemnify and hold the STATE and LOCAL AGENCY, and their agents, employees and /or officers harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense any and all claims, demands, suits, costs, of whatsoever kind or nature, brought against the STATE and /or LOCAL AGENCY and /or their agents, employees and officers arising out of, In connection with, or incident to the execution of this AGREEMENT and /or the DEVELOPER's performance or failure to perform any aspect of this AGREEMENT. Provided, however, that if such claims are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the DEVELOPER and (b) the STATE and /or LOCAL AGENCY, and /or their agents, employees and /or officers, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the DEVELOPER, and Provided further, that nothing herein shall require the DEVELOPER to hold harmless or defend the STATE and /or LOCAL AGENCY, and /or their agents, employees, and /or officers from any claims arising from the sole negligence of the STATE and /or LOCAL AGENCY, and /or their agents, employees, and /or officers. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the date first above written. DEVELOPER By. . Title: By: Date: LOCAL AGENCY 16. In the event that any party deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or obligations under this AGREEMENT, the parties hereto agree that any such action or proceeding shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction situated in Thurston County, Washington. 17. The LOCAL AGENCY hereby grants and conveys to the STATE the right of entry upon all land which the LOCAL AGENCY has interest, within or adjacent to the right of way of the highway, for the purpose of maintaining the traffic signal system. 18. The DEVELOPER shall convey all access rights (rights of ingress and egress) where indicated in green on Exhibit "A ", Page 2 of 3, at no cost to the STATE. The conveyance shall be recorded prior to any modification to the existing access to the SR 90 ramps. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 6-0E703 Intersowte EA are., 0.51Ac (a Bw,l..4h q l 6 -021.40 6•o21•9, 6.0213E1 602119 B+i.uen (Awlw.i. A. all UNNUeu.N llenun P'nt Tip ,Inc- 63i Ac. xhihnnh .f l . fMe. +ef.T 1 r Hanna o.18LC• 0.1.4 Ac. Na135 1 1E Shaer Ac . OA PARCEL 10. NAME TAIAI AREA otl AC. RN/ 5.31Ac. 293CAc. 14.19 Ac. LT. REMMNOER RT 4. 0.08 Ar EASEMENT OWNERSN1p5 lbre: sot - 0.'40P...AI aemeit. sae tktet 440.14 • • BEARING BASED ON PLANS 11 CONTRACT NO. zeta SLELNN. ROAD MFRCNANGE D�A��TED MY 30,984 RCN TE 13 r 34' 4r DFFEPENT hW( THE RAN PLM1 L•93.64 • • • 3TAT101NG BASED ON RAILS PI CONTRACT N0. 20t5 'SULLIVAN ROAD INTTRCRANGE; DATED ALT 30,984 0 v \- IP 6 V • 0 0 m f15 -W 9.92.50 P.C. NS -W 9.23.75 P.O.T. NS -W 913.3616 (305' LI oel`\ \ t SC 9 rRS IA •'O O `(o% 44, + t % LC e Crotty, entemen., ,neLdna 0.09 A..0 • sIT ^! ÷ %f C /÷* S J. 6 ,M \ ewe t I' PI t IAeE V W 54.15.!• 16 ,,, O. S ,T (/TIL /TY EASEMENT y SR 48.20.39 A.P. * • • NS -W 104.25.81 P.O.T. •• /E -NS 3.25.56 P.O.T. • 0 ■ \P 1006562 ‘.1$ .9 0" ‘;°'' V D \ 0 y r // R ,� \ _ v waT III Ill m L, °AITE0 A(LESS ' >nuI,1 OAR 1„5 T larrn" Cer� j AC-ESS \ 'o �E G E- Es-P__ 3: Nv '2..2 -11a -T 5 Z 5 . N ■. lra 0 ry 0 o -- � ? > wal W -NS RA =P E/5 RAMP (RIW Q,OnIy)J Q Spoken Valleylrrj. {Ten 0blr:d 010 Cana/ R /w, N50 G0 C. LIA 9 at Ty, so.37' T.25N. R.44E. 11 IA 104.70.44 4111t4 RAMP SGnI n 0 0 E -NS' 6.27.05 P.O.T. IA 106.00.77 P.O.C. /n �Tm/f1/17/771A/77 — AVE) a LINE CSD iP.l.'"IN At92 O __ -- S A.00 Rt.. m0 0% D 10.00, • e R 5/3.0, ni / T 292. 940. 3/ ... E-N5' 10� 05 6_ 9 p T /. 0 • UND o��02 so-0 F a • 0 2 i a° 4/ 7 Q Paris Add.': W.M. 110 IA 9 0.47.27 P.T Lttr 24 - la*n 1-z' 4-5461 ten LL 5 - r .0 rT • Lahr 8 - 89 8 R4 Lefler - i:n11 • .tt.es Le Letter 7 -to -ea Lelly 2112/90 - L /A 8Y OTHERS > , 7 I+ °' w in 11473.2 9 61:‘, 01 N1 t!` /t3 573 R 573.0 1 2\ i 7 162.7 ;� / L y4 " \ \ PI STATION NS - W I — .76.52 E -NS 9.014 IA 107.63.00 4 w- 6�6 • �qJ -4- %\f ; TR4n !Trensra • CURVE DATA 72' 42 38- 57' 35' 19" 23' 3 6' 2 0 LI. Po. NbREEN \Err UC_ 2Z t_At3 5•x. .13 J 4 0 r•Ao� _ t It•-en rw • / t ea ho 3.8.13/ R•vrSea Lana *owe Area pl O C9 u, no on Al J.K. llat 194171 PL fwd 4 Nev <wu N .Jr.399fe•ze.N.enenne..n 17.•a W.w. >....a. Rau 4 5&..2a5 n5e.e99e. ro.nw: aaant ower•n on pa Je.ten6- azrl7t/nvb<z ^t, LNG s rntnnt /into t /u:....run.,OM h. C..erh.utd;iiemn,,,lon T - - 41et.J.ti1t114.... ie..c..t en ry >ti. 4 1.91'.tl an S >a V5sr S,Lt.....IL. 1 LIUM:An•• 3 a . M.rA ner.a a zac>e) I •C And e•••.n. eons.", •ym't to SRI! : v« R1 ea .0 FJ. Co . C.••• ._. li 'Awned Rance( f ot -n.t.. ,may U r-/ y4.r rL ws Rey. L a.. .n. it Anne "J.r f r..! /3. . i. 37.00x .1.. .•19. I SO7 O n. • • • r . I... O per. l/fi /:/ Eln.r. 4. On hr. sr*. 16.77./.4 1. 337e/7 ..73' r .l0 C. On*. eee• pet. C. - ) , I > Rev. N/W el eewea .na deleted L/A on LI. Sra W Ol7al S 1,9/91 L/4 4-y allnn Son914 UN NS-VP Room. E-/4S' R • d S R LL' 4 4 Feded SR e, 95 -WI Remo. and ELMS Rvaq Dow.. e, w A41 S lor on< 7 cle y of R E P LYI Re /w o ft 5 ro 5 4 9.00. Added lvect ' R zo of S., SR •e0 and •e . R /way in.., n. • • on Lt.., 'too, dY > - o^ IS' rb R 250.00 4 00.00' 000.00 T 30226' 402.04 576.83' UT /L/TY EASEMENT FOR TRANSFER TO SPA, 6-0270 35 +69.05 64, 82' w500T Rea ggiabe 0 Ave. 84_02 219.85' 292.56 Mission DETAIL A" SCALE : / 30' ( REGION N0. STATE FEDERAL AO PROJECT NO . 10 I WASH. l 1 -90 -6_ ( ) H 1 g r A P/ Z OF 3 - • AR =•.e •r. WOeO b 0 .ip .n' cm..; r1. '•v ^eaen • '•• Y4e9r a v Men an mall 0 ✓o 37 •24./8 37•/7.73 3740Z. 76 36 >C SPofane V SrrSolion 0. 1110 Cnna/ ler 3 . 35.436./7 35.62.83 SR 90 ERia lrg SPOKANE TO GREENACRES SPOKANE COUNTY WA• N STATE e <w 1Ci•T mLw .aoN onA.T:a.T 0? smnwAn 250.00 A 0 0.47,27 P T. • Ins }Sa ram>♦� naea:rrrrt(}�1 y'S1�- Trssea m7sracssn., raTS �rn�ar��mm Glrins "c" °wnssnmc.� Iur ie l:ns eeel:A nro wm fnn h (bone/yew, t41 Minn; ".•I %:/ NSanmlw Rt Pl Letter 7 e.es.0 Z.& ......a.e A.;: a.,...... . ". .....a _ al. . 3.. ,_ O : . a G.n. R jr l..r' i].COe ••a .. Ja. rl ✓a .. 3P RR. ✓ ri L I ilia. h 4 La p, v. e. fin. f. / CrmY. S.. 1/18/91 LIA by.mt,.s Ll ar-HSI F .F SR LM.: SF LFa, NS- W�p /3'R r , Reran East 9.9 2301e WN /1 Ow a <.aa 1 SF a a a •a EJcri'et id ' 0a41aCF lh : Peel V+ 4a F'EP � T SA w.eo 1a1w.a. .,...e..ry .t Len.. 12@190 6 3 5.69.05 W500T MI SS/ b n 1 -90 -6- ( ) W.M. • 110 Lin m OTHERS a t‘‘. it! Y1 k P o a c. c F;i. W /n 11 t73.2 \ g : � ' - 0 31 ' i � ' 0 10.00,30 "Lt. i1 a • / R 573.0' 2 m1 4 / T 162.7 . 3 1 3 L AGeLt,7 E Uc.. 22s42 5.-13 A be DETAIL An SCALE : / = 30• P H 6E 3 49P An Pub �a a tanni • SR 9O SPOKANE TO GREENACRES SPOKANE COUNTY' W AS+saro.. @Tan oce.w4T m.aaylala mtraanT or emlmASS °Lim& WAS,n.n_,,.. 37.24./5 37 ./7.73 37.02. 76 e a 36+63. 90 t Spofane Va/ Irrgo Pion Dist- alto Cana/ Rnv. 35.86 - /7 35.62,55 teltUe �•s 0, NA Th — SEWN 10.1r PUMP Ell 71t•JVC 111-170 T.251.1, R.94 E, MI LI PC 94 a ,` \ \ Y. .�; e ` µOµ �K. c n`�rv� p ` ."c ro.• m ..m�nn�'� / r bA /F °Th „I�.I `..0 3t . ,,•, aas.+u� l ®` � 1` HIGHWAY DIVISION Id • 9890 -- M Washinglon Slate SULLIVAN ROAD INTERCHANGE WI Department of Transportation RAMP MODIFICATIONS \1 71SGY &HM1 . noel. vrrmx Pe9Yu _ CHANNE1.2ATION A SIGNING PLAN CXf/ /W /7 p /010 4 "E-NS' 1.54.44 P.O.T.. E-NS 1.56.64 (2r Lt.) 'saran' C Wrn-nrsscr_Ls �.aA.. •Irrritago. osOxpator a.0. encore rri I R�'rr^l![lM..[r`rQiR��ll�e 64. at 37 /7.73 4 OTTERS 41, no ' • 1 ' 9 1F 1. IA 60.47.27 P,T 0 4 ` 1 / P.1. W/N 11773.2 s i 1p A 31''30 -Lt. N� S D 10 P /° R 573.0, M\ 4 / r 162.7 1tlfn1.26 4.541 (aer 7.30 -48 Loiter 2112190 3 -8 -8L Ineim P1 STATION NS -W 1•76.52 E -NS 9.03.49 IA 107.63.00 A 72r 42' 38' 8t. 57 35' I9' PI 23'36' -P A R 250 00' 400 00 T 402 04' 11400 576.83' 184 02' 317.26' 219 85' 292.56' d Lot3 S ec. \3 Ronan Lana su Pc Ar Ar aC 'worse on II ...14 .10 to J07 ;,p .w.w Rrwlaum✓o3.0 99 re ALL •.p. on .r .q•79 )7 raerg•msw. 35•42.135 no son..AB ramq; •00 eel .rww n M. fu "Me/16-0z On+ /no.n nor, I • el: ne, r rAn'n....nenonns . (Aunty, y eaxmml as At •6•80! LCRar S•e.en O. Inn as of n d r en A cony., a n r>... ...].n1 - •a.O.• > -r. r. ee St. al 05•• :...it:...it....... u ..[[.• 64 L brat, , At au ] .. yey A.,.e Neu TQ•L5a3 iJ La - ,I. 7 -81 8%8 P4 I Ad.0 e.... ul.q eaa r ttt s. u., Ad A .0 c e c- . .L .- ;.^: : : :�n : : 'C2..5 11r.. P.rte/ : - OL r.., . : ; . .ae. —'-s... J ..nt re....., ; A' n,e. u..n.a. .a.[ /5 • oo4 % re e w 'I. .. rye. n. Y. //•r J.. : ., C.- .'a/v; Ae.�[ /ri/: l�C /m y.raa 13a7 .. Jo. ,..IC .e 37. ,, .73' we. Pc[. A -or7G Pa.. R/W a[ (Kona a4 4.41111/A An 1. • c • W 9 .925010 WS 6.20_ MI AC L by other[ song IA L . Rona. Rw. EARS' Ran; ay SR Om Aaeaa IA inn: 5 e 56 9.00 Adage Or ,. ' Fn Wrl A/ Sr� S0.e0 NRe[a Nn Wen!, el n la. (/5 •..a ....n 6, w a ■••••. ••. •. An.- ... an .... �RtL mErWT uc 2342. REP o 6 -02703 35 069.05 (wsoor) Mission DETAIL 'A" SCALE : I 30' REGION 60, 10 STATE WASH. FEDERAL AID PROJECT N0. I -90 -6- ( ) 4 A r c An Ran w • [ Aw e•w '° a••"g. Donne,/ I 48 . � 0 n E x \--k,61-1- 4 PItb \ 3646 t Spo/fone Vat Irr9Ation Dislr. #/O Cana/ R /W. 0 37 .24./0 37002. 76 35.66./7 35.62.85 IEET SR 90 SPOKANE TO GREENACRES SPOKANE COMM fArawaTon nee na4WAT mynoal• oAnxr.r OP RACXWAT3 OLnr[a. WASmartw cAU: ROBS 1 wv a 100 rar SCA• -. rnT. 1 Olen - 10 on Arr■ofra. SEPT 22.1583 m.t 0 S. Asphalt 0.70'Comp. Depth To Be Done By Others _—ii /AI - - At 6t1 r Asphalt 0.70'Comp. Depth To Be Done By Others Crave! B' Varies Edge 0'to 8' of 011 --..- l es , 0'to 10' Crusehed Surfacing Top Course 0.30'Comp. Depth Grovel Base.Ballast or Crushed Surfacing Base Course 0.50'Comp. Depth E - NS Romp Sta.10 +88.09 to Sta.14 +10.61 (Widening Only) NS -W Romp Sta.92 +38.91 to Sta.99 +04,91 (Widening Only) TYPICAL SHOULDER WIDENING _era..4mm/ Varles 8' to 12' Varies t Romp V9rles 0 TO 4' Varies 0' to 12 Varies Varies Crusehed Surfacing Top Course 0.30'COmp. Depth Base,Ballas+ or Crushed Surfacing Base Course 0.50'Comp. Depth E- NS'Ramp Sta.6 +83.64 to Sta.10 +85.69 NS- W'Ramp Sta.9 +92.50 to Sto.14 +50.00 TYPICAL RAMP SECTION * See Intersection Plan For Widening Ramp Agreement #UC 2842. Future Asphalt Concrete Pavenent 0.06' Comp. Depth Crushed Surfacing Top Course Fillet 4' EXH I BT "B" Pg 3 of 4 LEGEND r S r I' etritrem. r Err II • • SEE SHEE r I or 2 FOR PL 4 T MAP 'INTERSECTION DETAIL] DEDICATION BASIS OF BEARING • SURVEYORS • g 1A.W1li, /7.r.4. CERTIFICATE IA MI. LEGEND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT r / .i CC SHEET 2 OF 21 'uc aas'z_ COUNTY OFFICIALS lr_ —v &At- r 4r n m Ar, • .- - ....,T_, FINAL PLAT . SULLIVAN PARK CENTER A PLAT IN A PORTION OF THE S 1/2 OF SEC II, NW 1/4 SEC 13, NE 1/4 SEG 14 TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST WM. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON CLARENCE E SIMPSON ENGINEERS. INC. N.909 ARGONNE ROAD PH:925-1322 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99212 ac -,2 40,4-- V I, „, :;t d DEVELOPER AGREEMENT CONSTRUCTION BY STATE AT DEVELOPER EXPENSE AGREEMENT NUMBER • UC 2843 STATE ROUTE NUMBER 90 CONTROL SECTION NUMBER 320307 DISTRICT NUMBER 6 ADVANCE PAYMENT AMOUNT $ 16,000.00 ORGANIZATION AND ADDRESS R. A. Hanson Company, Inc. P.O. Box 7400 Spokane, WA 99207 SECTION /LOCATION Sullivan Road and I -90 Interchange DESCRIPTION OF WORK 'Paving with ACP (CLD and CLE) the hook ramps and tapers at the Sullivan Road Interchange as shown in Exhibits A & B, and to be included in State Contract SR -90, Pines Road to Seaton. This AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 19 — between the STATE OF WASHINGTON, Department of Transportation, acting by and through the Secretary of Transporta- tion, hereinafter called the "STATE,” and the above named organization, hereinafter called the "DEVELOPER." WHEREAS, the DEVELOPER wishes to construct an intersection and /or related improvements within the STATE's rights of way, and WHEREAS, the STATE is planning the construction or improvement of a section of state route as shown above, and in connection therewith, the DEVELOPER has requested that the STATE perform certain work as herein described, and WHEREAS, it is deemed to be in the best interest for the STATE to include the necessary items of work, as requested by the DEVELOPER, in the STATE's construction contract proposed for the improvement of this section of State Highway, and WHEREAS, the STATE and the DEVELOPER now wish to define responsibility for construction and maintenance of the proposed improvements. NOW THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed between the parties hereto as follows: 1. The STATE, as agent acting for and on behalf of the DEVELOPER, agrees to perform the above "Description of Work." Plans, specifications and cost estimates shall be prepared by the STATE in accordance with the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction, and adopted design stand- ards, unless otherwise noted. The STATE will incorpo- rate the plans and specifications into the STATE's project and thereafter advertise the resulting project for bid and, assuming bids are received and a contract is awarded, administer the contract. ... The DEVELOPER hereby approves the plans and speci- fications for the described work as shown on Exhibit "B," attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. 2. The DEVELOPER may, if it desires, furnish an inspec- tor on the project. Any costs for such inspection will be borne solely by the DEVELOPER. All contact between said inspector and the STATE's contractor shall be through the STATE's representative. 3. The DEVELOPER agrees, upon satisfactory completion of the work involved, to deliver a letter of acceptance which shall include a release and waiver of all future claims or demands of any nature resulting from the per- formance of the work under this AGREEMENT. 4. The DEVELOPER, in consideration of the faithful per- formance of the work to be done by the STATE, agrees to reimburse the STATE for the actual direct and related indirect cost of the work. An itemized estimate of cost for work to be performed by the STATE at the DEVELOPER's expense is marked Exhibit `A," and is attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. Partial payments shall be .made by the DEVELOPER, upon request of the STATE, to cover costs incurred. These payments are not to be more frequent than one (1) per month. It is agreed that any such partial payment will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any item and that, at the time of final audit, all required adjustments will be made and reflected in a final pay- ment. 5. The DEVELOPER agrees to pay the STATE the "Ad- vance Payment Amount" stated above within 20 days af- ter final execution of this AGREEMENT. The advance payment represents approximately fifteen (15) percent of the estimate of cost and covers costs incurred by the . STATE in the initial stages of the project. The advance payment will be carried throughout the life of the project with final adjustment made in the final payment. 6. In the event unforeseen conditions require an increase in the cost of 25 percent or more from that agreed to on Exhibit "A," this AGREEMENT will be modified by supplement AGREEMENT covering said increase. . In the event it is determined that any change from the description of work contained in this AGREEMENT is required, approval must be secured from the DEVEL- OPER prior to the beginning of such work. Where the change is substantial, written approval must be secured. Reimbursement for increased work and /or a substantial change in the description of work shall be limited to costs covered by a written modification, change order or extra work order approved by the DEVELOPER. 7. The DEVELOPER hereby grants and ._conveys to the STATE the right of entry upon all land which the DE- VELOPER has interest, within or adjacent to the right of way of the highway, for the purpose of constructing said improvements. 8. The STATE shall have ownership and control of the com- pleted facility within the STATE right -of -way, with the exception that the DEVELOPER, his assigns and succes- sors, shall be responsible for the construction, reconstruc- tion and maintenance of the road approach and appurtenances between the shoulder line of the highway and the right -of -way line inclusive of surfacing and drain- age. 9. Any breach of the terms and conditions of this AGREE- MENT, or failure on the part of the DEVELOPER to proceed with due diligence and in good faith in the main- tenance work provided for herein, shall subject this AGREEMENT to be cancelled and, at the option of the IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year first above written. DEVELOPER By: Title Date. DOT Revise 8/86 QX A.175 STATE, may.require the DEVELOPER to remove all or part of the facilities constructed hereunder at the DE- VELOPER's sole expense. 10. The DEVELOPER shall indemnify and hold the STATE and its agents, employees and /or officers harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense any and all claims, demands, suits at law or equity, actions, penal- ties, losses, damages, or costs, of whatsoever kind or nat- ure, brought against the STATE arising out of, in connection with, or incident to the execution of this AGREEMENT and /or the DEVELOPER's perform- ance or failure to perform any aspect of this AGREE- MENT. Provided, however, that if such claims are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the DEVELOPER and (b) the STATE, its agents, employees and /or officers, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the DEVELOPER, and Provided further, that nothing herein shall require the DEVELOPER to hold harmless or de- fend the STATE, its agents, employees and /or officers from any claims arising from the sole negligence of the STATE, its agents, employees, and /or officers. 11. In the event that any party deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or obliga- tion under this AGREEMENT, the parties hereto agree that any such action or proceeding shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction situated in Thurston County, Washington. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By. ITEM STD. NO. ITEM NO CS 3203 SR 90 PINES TO SEATON SULLIVAN ROAD I/C XL -0544 609029W WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P5 8 E ESTIMATE DATE: 28-Feb-91 PREPARATION . ITEM 1 1 * MOBILIZATION 6.00 %L.S. S4,000.00 LIQUID ASPHALT 2 5325 ASPAHLT FOR TACK COAT TON $200.00 2 8400.00 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 3 5775 ASPHALT CONC. PAVEMENT CL. D TON $30.00 300 $9,000.00 4 5780 ASPHALT CONC. PAVEMENT CL. E TON $23.00 2500 857,500.00 CONTRACT TOTAL WASHINGTON STATE SALES TAX 7 . 80 % PROJECT SUBTOTAL - $76,430.20 * ENGINEERING 12.00% $9,171.62 CONTINGENCIES 5.00 %. $3,821.51 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 10.00% $8,942.33 SUBTOTAL WSDOT OVERHEAD TOTAL ESTIMATED COST * Mobilization and engineering costs will determined by a pro - ration of the mobilization and engineering costs of the entire project to the construction costs of the work covered by this agreement. EXHIBIT "A" DISTRICT 6 AGREEMENT #UC2843 8.22% LENGTH (IN MILES) : 0.00 UNITS UNIT PR WANT AMOUNT *Irk* * ***** 870,900.00 $5,530.20 898,365.66 $8,085.66 $106,451.32 • peA �r /f � u......w 'F :F n nM;nM inh..InnY• NnMe T.25N., R.44 E., W. M. Pt M. 0/4, 1440101 11' 1.150 TRUCE WANDS MIS awrocv zrasturs MS ISMS 11.......a u adula DOT =.w HIGHWAY DIVISION A7 a Washington State Department of Transportation R7LSGY &I'IA1'5 PC 104•70 4 7 tee ,Rte-.,_-f ac Z8"3 CLAIM sR90 SULLIVAN ROAD INTERCHANGE RAMP MODIFICATIONS S ]NIX, AMITY N P 2919? 2 CHANNDnATION s s'OMNG PLAN st x-• a, ex4;4i -. /o 3 ACP Cl. 0 0.06'Comp.Oepth ACP Cl. E 0.64'Comp.Depth S .S.T• 611 1 * See Inter Plan For Widening Varies Edge O'to B of 011 Varies Varies Otto 10' C.S.T.C. Fillet To Be Removed Surfacing To Be Done By Others E - NS Ramp Sta.10 +88.09 to Sta.14 +10.61 (Widening Only) NS -W Ramp Sto.92 +38.91 to Sta.99 +04.91 (Widening Only) TYPICAL SHOULDER WIDENING 8' Varies 9' to 12' E Ramp Varies 0 ' to 12' ACP Cl. E 0.64'Comp.Depth ACP CI. D 0.06'Comp.Depth Varies Voriee 0 TO 4' E- NS'Ramp Sto.6 +83.64 to Sta.10 +85.69 NS W'Ramp Sta.9+92.50 to Sta.14 +50.00 TYPICAL RAMP SECTION E Romp Agreement #UC.28]3 ACP 0.06'Comp. Depth A Surfacing To Be Done By Others t EXHIBT "B" Pp 2 of 3 LOT 1 LEGEND 1! • SCE SHEET 10F 2 Ed( PLAT MAP (INTERSECTION DETAIL( DEDICATION 1 BASIS OF BEARING n"R'R SURVETORS CERTIFICATE LEGEND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 1... - ,.•-•• ,.. T. SHEET 2 OF 21 it a. zSets ■ COUNTT OFFICIALS FINAL PLAT SULLIVAN PARK CENTER A PLAT IN A PORTION OF THE 5 1/20F SEC II, NW l/4 SEC 13, NE 1/4 SEC 14 TOWNSHIP 25 NORTF{ RANGE 44 EAST W AL SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON' ei I,: CLARENCE E. SIMPSON ENGINEERS. INC. N.909 ARGONNE ROAD P11: 926.1322 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99212 E BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 93 0133 AGREEMENT WITH R.A. HANSON COMPANY ) FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT SULLIVAN ROAD ) AND INDIANA AVENUE INTERSECTION ) COUNTY ROAD PROJECT NO. 2388 WHEREAS, The R.A. Hanson Co. Inc. a Washington Corporation, is desirous of improving the intersection of Sullivan Road and Indiana Avenue by installation of a traffic signal system and appurtenant channelization and roadway improvements, which improvements are for the purpose of enhancing access to property at Sullivan Road and Indiana Avenue; and WHEREAS, The R.A. Hanson Co., Inc. has agreed to pay the total costs and expenses of the project; and WHEREAS, An agreement has been prepared for execution by the Developers and Spokane County for the mutually agreed conditions and the County 'Engineer recommends execution by Spokane County; and WHEREAS, The County Engineer recommends this project be included in the 1990 construction program and requests authorization to proceed with preliminary engineering. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the 1990 construction element of the "..1990 -1996 construction program be and is hereby unanimously amended and the County Engineer authorized to proceed with preliminary engineering for this project. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Board. of County Commissioners of . Spokane County, Washington, that the Agreement between Spokane County and R.A`. Hanson Co., Inc. for the improvement of Sullivan Road and Indiana Avenue is hereby approved and the Chair of the Board hereby authorized to execute same by and on behalf of Spokane County. PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane. County, Washington this 6th day of February, 1990. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE LERK OF THE B RESOLUTION BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON A. Mummey, Chair 94 .0133. AGREEMENT This agreement, dated this !O day of e } 1990 , by and between R.A. Hanson Company. Inc. , a Washington Corporation, for itself, its heirs, executors, administrators, successors of assigns, hereinafter called the "DEVELOPER," and SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal corporation in the State of Washington, for the purpose of improving the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Sullivan Road by installation of traffic signal system, which improvement is for the purpose of enhancing access to the Developer's property under the following mutually agreed conditions, to wit: Spokane County agrees to perform the following: 1. To-prepare plans, specifications and estimate of cost for the project and Call for Bids from private contractors to accomplish said work. 2. To enter into a contract with the contractor submitting their lowest and best bid, subject to the approval of the Developer, and the deposit by the Developer of the contract amount, including signal equipment, plus 20% for construction engineering, inspection and contingencies with Spokane County. 3. To pay the contractor amounts due as the work is accomplished. 4. To deduct from the Developer's deposit the total costs and expenses of the project upon the completion thereof, including engineering, administration and associated costs. 5. To 'refund any balance of the Developer's deposit in excess of the total cost and expense of the improvement, or 6. To bill the Developer for the costs and expenses of the project which exceed the deposit amount, if any. 7. Upon completion of the work to accept the same as part of the County road system and assume maintenance responsibility therefor. The Developer agrees as follows: 1. To deposit the amount of Eight Thousand and No /100 Dollars ($8,000.00) with Spokane County at the time of execution of this Agreement to initiate preliminary engineering for the project. 2. After bid opening by the County, but prior to award of the contract, to promptly deposit the contract amount, including signal equipment, plus twenty percent (20 %) for construction engineering, inspection, contingencies, and associated costs with Spokane County. 3. To pay promptly which exceed the THE PARTIES are their agreement. APPROVED: ki Spokane County Engineer APPROVED AS TO FORM: De'uty Prosecuting Attorney 0 7 1 10 to the County, as billed, for any and all costs of the project deposit amounts. here agreed that this is the whole and complete statement of DEVELOPER: R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. 09 a. yet4a-0---11. v az tut , By: Title: Bus.Address: P.O. -Box 7400 SPOKANE COUNTY Spokane, Washington i . i7 Chairman of the Board County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington 99207 � v 0 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE \A O � , @00�� FINDINGS & ORD E R CO y DATE: November 19, 1985 RE: PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER ZE- 180 -78, Restricted Industrial to B -2, B -3, I -1 & GA (Requested zoning will be in effect on effective date of revised Spokane County Zoning Code). 1. That the proposal is a mixed -use development on a 226 acres site. Included are a 79 acre regional shopping center, 19 acres of other commercial use, 22 acres of business park, 53 acres of industrial park, a 300 room hotel and a remaining 43 acres of roadways and open space. The development will he accomplished through the subdivision of the property as shown on the applicant's site development plan of 42 lots, rezoning of the property consistent with the adopted 1986 Spokane County Zoning Code. The review of this project is further consistent with the site development plan review requirements established with the Restricted Industrial zoning of the property in 1981. The project sponsor has indicated that the full development of the site will take approximately 15 years to accomplish. 2. That the proposal is located north of Interstate 90 on either side of the Sullivan Road interchange. The site southeast of the Spokane River occupies portions of Sections 10, 11, 12, 13 & 14, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. 3. That the item has been properly advertised in accordance with state and local regulations. The Committee first took testimony for a scheduled hearing on October 24, 1985 at which time it was brought to the Committee's attention that approximately three property owners had not received personal mail notification of the proposal. The Committee continued the public hearing to November 15, 1985 to allow the sponsor to renotify all property owners within 400 ft. of the proposal and afforded all interested parties an opportunity to testify and express their concerns or objections to the proposal. A correction to the legal notice for the November 15, 1985 hearing was made to reflect that a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement had been prepared rather than the earlier notice which indicated a DNS had been issued for this project. 4. That the Hearing Examiner Committee spent two days considering public testimony on Sullivan Park Center. Public testimony regarding the project focused most attention upon the project's potential impact to existing wildlife in the Spokane River Ecosystem adjoining the property to the north and the adverse impacts of the high traffic volumes which will be generated from the project when it is fully developed. These impacts include noise, high exhaust, and inconvenience for area residents. Additional concerns considered by the Committee were that the proposed development was an unnecessary commercial development and could pose an adverse impact upon existing businesses on Sprague and elsewhere in the County. Findings & Order for PE- 1504 -85 (Cont'd) The Committee did receive testimony favorable to the project which indicated that this development would establish more jobs and create an enhanced economy for the Valley. That the Committee heard from the Board of Directors for The Walk In The Wild Zoo that they were generally in favor of the project in that it would enhance their exposure to the general public. 5. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Industrial and the proposal is consistent with the land uses identified in this category. 6. That the Committee finds, the proposal is significantly buffered from most residential uses in the Valley in that to the south of the property lies the Interstate freeway and a natural ridgeline elevated above the freeway on the freeway's southern border. To the north of the site lies the Spokane River, the Kaiser Trentwood Works and further to the east the Spokane Industrial Park. Two areas which have some large lot residential development abutting the property were considered by the Committee. One area lies generally on the east side of the project, adjacent and easterly of Flora, the other area lies to the southwest of the project generally parallel to Indiana Avenue as it currently located. The Committee finds that these residential areas are deserving of protection through site - buffering and restrictions to the development which the sponsor has agreed to in his presentations. 7. That the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act, Chapter 43.21C RCW, WAC 197 -11 and the Spokane Environmental Ordinance, Title 11 of the Spokane County Code have been met and more particularly: a) By document issued January 8, 1985 by Wallis D. Hubbard, Planning Director, the Sullivan Park Center PEIS, Volumes 1 and 1 (9/80) and FEIS (2/81) are recognized as adopted by reference pursuant to WAC 197 -11- 600(4) and Sokane Environmental Ordinance 11.20.230. b) By document signed January 8, 1985 by Wallis D. Hubbard, Planning Director, a Determination of Significance and Request for Comments and on scope of a Supplemental EIS was issued for modification to the original site plan, a preliminary plat and zone reclassifications. c) The above documents were circulated consistent with WAC 197 -11 -408 and public notice given consistent with WAC 197 -11 -510 and Spokane Environmental Ordinance 11.10.130. d) The Draft Supplemental EIS was scoped, drafted, issued, circulated, reviewed, revised and a Final Supplemental EIS issued ursuant to WAC 197 -11 and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance. e) The total original EIS, the Supplemental EIS and public comment given at the public hearing were noted and evaluated during the decision making process, including particularly extensive information regarding habitat impacts and effects upon flora and fauna, both directly and indirectly. Findings & Order for PE- 1504 -85 (Cont'd) 8. That unavoidable adverse impacts to secondary habitat and certain fauna are acknowledged as most likely a consequence of the originally improved R -I zoning and generalized site plan. Of particular note the Committee notes comment R18 on Page 172 of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for Sullivan Park Center prepared in 1981 which indicates that "it is unlikely that this edge would be maintained by following the 1 /8th mile criteria. One reason is that the site lies adjacent to a major freeway interchange within the Spokane Metropolitan Area and is readily accessible to a large number of people....A second and more important reason is that the site is under private ownership. Unless some government agency or citizens' group purchases the site, the present owner currently has the right to develop within the confines of the existing zoning, regardless of the Ecosystem boundaries." 9. That the revised plan has no greater adverse impacts than the existing approved project and most likely less in so far as: a) The riparian buffer area is larger than before and will become a part of the County's Spokane River riparian park system. b) The present proposal will be hooked to areawide sewering, thus eliminating the threat to the Aquifer from on -site sanitary waaste disposal. c) The present proposal will have less carbon monoxide pollution than projected by the original EIS. d) Slightly less traffic will be generated by the present proposal when compated to the existing approved proposal and the projected traffic laod will be handled more efficiently and effectively. e) The stormwaer runoff treatment by grass percolation areas has been proven to be acceptable treatment for protection of the Aquifer. 10. NOTE: Pursuant to WAC 197 -11- 680(5), Notice is hereby given that in conjunction with final approval of the above reference matter that: a). The time limit for commencing SEPA appeal of the approval of the above referenced matter, as provided by county ordinance, is 30 calendar days from final execution of the above Findings and Order. b). The time frame for appealing any SEPA issues with respect to the approval of the above referenced matter is 30 days after the execution of the above Findings and Order. c). The appeal of either the approval of the above referenced matter or any SEPA issues may be filed in the Spokane County Superior Court or a court of competent jurisdiction as provided by law. d). That decisions of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee become "Final" unless appealed within 10 days of the Committee written decision. e). Decisions rendered by the Board of County Commissioners are final when the Board signs its Findings and Order. Findings & Order for PE- 1504 -85 (Cont'd) 11. That the Committee notes that a project proposing similar uses as are currently under consideration was approved in March of 1981. That action rezoned the property to Restricted Industrial under the Zoning Ordinance for Spokane County which is still in effect. Although the previous action provided for a zone reclassification, the Committee finds the current proposal with its extensive landscaping provisions, road network improvements and provisions for public sewering to represent a substantial improvement over the project as previously considered. 12. The Committee notes the Spokane River Ecosystem is an important natural feature which includes open fields, grasslands and some ponderosa pine and is a wildlife habitat for various wildlife including bird species and small mammals. The Committee believes the riparian park proposal will bring about a continued habitat for some of these animals and will in all likelihood prevent some of the existing manmade degradation to the riveroank as was testified to by the Spokane County Parks Director. This degradation included substantial motorcycle and camping use along the riverbank as well as large amounts of trash left by persons using this area of the river. The project has been designed consistent with the state and local provisions of the Shorelines Management Act contained in RCW 90.58 and the local Shorelines Management Plan for Spokane County. 13. That the Committee finds the necessary utility and public improvements necessary to support this project have been provided for in County staff recommendations and have been agreed to by the sponsor. These improvements will cause the project to serve the general public health, safety and welfare. 14. The Committee understands that certain environmental changes will occur, but this was understood when the initial concept was approved in 1981. The Committee believes the benefits from this project will outweight any adverse impacts. 15. The Committee received a petition from area residents indicating only that they were opposed to Sullivan Park Center. The petition did not indicate why or how those who signed it felt the project would have an adverse impact to them. 16. Testimony was proposed to the Committee regarding the project sponsor's activities in other jurisdiction which the Committee declined to hear. The Committee felt such testimony was not relevant to the project currently being heard and the Committee had the necessary powers to insure that the project was properly conditioned and carried out in the public interest. Findings & Order for PE- 1504 -85 (Cont'd) CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the above findings concludes that the application of preliminary plat PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER and Zone Change ZE- 180 -78 from Restricted Industrial to 8 -2, B -3, I -1 & GA be APPROVED as conditioned in accordance with the Conditions of Approval attached hereto. VOTE: Unanimously approved ATTE THE HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTESTS TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION AND VOTE. Chaffrpera n s jGO/�2 /�cL /�.Ce /.', t e ./ 1 1/707,e4,‘,40,, /9.1 /97 1'' DATE Spokane County Subdivision Administrator PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER IN REFERENCE TO THE ATTACHED FINDINGS & ORDER, THE HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE IS ON 1 RI' A ''D'R i VI . •11 1 • •I' , 1 1. That the below listed conditions of all Departments and Agencies are binding upon the applicant, owner(s) of the property, heirs, successors or assigns. COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2. The preliminary plat of record approval is for the property legally described in the application for this proposal. 3. That the final plat(s).or phases be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record as legally described and advertised. However, the Subdivision Administrator may grant administrative approvals for divisions of land as provided by State law or local ordinance provided such divisions are consistent with the concept plan. 4. The Spokane County Subdivision Administrator shall review any proposed Final Plat to insure compliance with the Findings and Conditions of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. All final plats shall illustrate the 200 ft. setback from the ordinary high water mark pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act. 5. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for three (3) years to November 1, 1988. The applicant may request an Extension of Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 6. Upon filing the Final Plat the zone change of the Final Plat area shall be finalized and the existing Agricultural and Restricted Industrial zone classifications shall be in accordance with the zoning concept plan. 7. Prior to finalization of any part of the project, the existing Burlington Northern railroad lines through the western portion of the property will be either acquired and abandoned or relocated to the north of Indiana Avenue along the riparian park on the preliminary plat. 8. The applicant shall submit evidence that any structures located within the development are compatible with easement rights of any grantees of record, i.e., transmission lines prior to building permit release. 9. Prior to the finalization of Phase I, the general area shown as the riparian park shall be owned and maintained as a passive park by the Property Owners Association to be formed by the purchasers of lots within the project. Specific conditions, covenants and restrictions relating to maintenance and use of the park shall be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Zoning Administrator and filed with the Spokane County Auditor. Nothing within this condition shall prohibit the sponsor or subsequent owners from reaching agreements for the use or transfer of the riparian park to Spokane County. It is the intention of this condition to provide for regular maintenance of the passive park and retain it for public use. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) Planning Department ( Cont'd) 10. That the planting and maintenance of the limited access areas shown as Open Space at the Sullivan Road /I -90 interchange and south of Indiana shall be provided by applicant or successors consistent with road landscaping requirements of Spokane County and the State of Washington. 11. The open space plantings and maintenance at the proposed Evergreen interchange shall be provided by the applicant or successor at the time the interchange is established. 12. The boulevard treatment landscaping for Indiana will be established or provided for as part of Phase I finalization by the applicant or successors. 13. That a Final Plat name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 14. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat, for distribution to the County Planning Department, Utilities Department, Engineering Department, Health District and applicable utility companies. Written approval of said utility easements by said utility companies must be received with the submittal of the final plat. 15. That a current certificate of title be furnished the County Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 16. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements unless the applicant(s) /sponsor(s) choose to file a notarized Waiver of Notice of Action with the Spokane County Planning Department. 17. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for lots to be developed prior to release of building permits. 18. That a plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection be approved by the water supplier, fire protection district, Spokane County Building & Safety Department and County health authorities. The agencies will certify on the WATER PLAN, prior to the filing of the final plat or any phase of the preliminary plat that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The WATER PLAN and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) Planning Department (Cont'd) The purveyor will also certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved WATER PLAN. The time schedule will provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat sponsor shall also sign the WATER PLAN to confirm the contractual arrangements or agreements. The final plat dedication will contain the following statement: "the public water system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building & Safety Department, and water purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 19. That no occupancy permit will be issued for any lot within the Final Plat until certified by a Washington State licensed engineer "that the water system has been installed pursuant the approved WATER PLAN for the Final Plat ", signed and stamped by said engineer. The certification may be in the form of a letter but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the WATER PLAN as a schematic map showing the "As Built" water system. 20. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 21. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the 1986 Spokane County Zoning Code. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 22. All mitigating measures set forth in the Final EIS be complied with and has been agreed to by the applicant. 23. That the project is subject to the Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone of the Spokane County Ordinance, which sets forth various measures for Aquifer protection; specifically, measures dealing with wastewater disposal, spill protection measures and stormwater runoff. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 24. The applicant shall provide sight- obscuring cyclone fencing 6 ft. in height along the southerly borders of Lots 1 through 9 of the preliminary plat and along the westerly edge of Lots 10 and 11 which adjoin properties not within the development. Additionally, the applicant shall provide a 6 ft. sight- obscuring fence along Lot 27 in the area which has been indicated by the applicant in a site plan amendment to be dedicated as non - developable. This area is approximately 500 ft. wide extending westerly of Flora Road. COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT 1. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to dedication of Right -of -Way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. That plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. 5. That appropriate provisions be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1 -ft. strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the final plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) 6. A statement must appear in the dedicatory language of the final plat: "that individual driveway access permits be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system." 7. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to Sullivan Road. 8. That all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 9. That the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal acceptable to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway- County Road intersection. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the responsibility of the sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. This shall include both Phase I and Phase II designs. 10. That the applicant shall coordinate with the Spokane County Parks and Recreation Department and the County Engineer's Department to provide a bicycle pathway through the northern portion of the project paralleling the Spokane River. This pathway would be provided in lieu of bicycle lanes along the proposed arterial streets. 11. That access to Evergreen Road from parcels 12, 15, 16 and 17 is prohibited. 12. That the applicant shall submit to the County Engineer an intersection plan for the Evergreen -local access road located south of Indiana. 13. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which established regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 14. That prior to finalization of the proposed plat, the applicant shall submit to the County Engineer for review and approval "Typical" Roadway Cross Sections for the following proposed roadways: '.a. Indiana Avenue Sullivan to the proposed Evergreen intersection. N4b. Indiana Avenue from the proposed Evergreen intersection to the connection with the existing Indiana Avenue at the west end of the proposal. �c. Evergreen Road south of Indiana Avenue, between Indiana and the proposed Evergreen interchange. d. Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus. 15. The typical roadway cross section for the roadway which connects the proposed Evergreen Road with the proposed Indiana Avenue in the westerly portion of the plat shall be typical roadway section No. 1 access standard. 16. That the typical roadway cross section for the cul -de -sac which is proposed east of Sullivan Road and extends southeasterly from Indiana Avenue shall be typical roadway section No. 1 access standard. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) V 17. That prior to recording of the final plat, the Burlington Northern Railroad line which runs through portions of the proposal on both the east and west sides of Sullivan Road, shall be abandoned or relocated. Prior to release of a building permit for those portions of the proposal identified as Phase I, the applicant shall: 18. Obtain permits for roadway construction from the appropriate state and county agencies (Spokane County Engineer). 19. Improve the Sullivan Road Intersection in a manner consistent with the approved plans and as set forth in the supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. 20. Construct those roadways which are identified in the supplemental Environmental Impact Statement as being necessary in order to accommodate traffic volumes which will be generated by Phase I. Construction shall be in conformance with the approved roadway plans and typical roadway cross - sections. Roadway construction must be completed prior to the release of building permits or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction improvements, construction certification, "as- built" plans, and monumenting the street centerline shall be filed with the County Engineer. 21. Construct a connection to the existing Indiana Avenue which is located to the south and west of the westerly boundary of the proposed plat. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to obtain the necessary right -of -way alignment for this connection. This connection must provide for a smooth transition between the existing Indiana Avenue and that which is proposed within the plat. The transition alignment shall be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer. The County Engineer will provide assistance during right -of -way negotiations should it be necessary. 22. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as- built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 23. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the proposed building site prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 24. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan for proposed building sites shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing, as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. 25. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 26. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 27. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 28. Should the Phase I development include those portions of the property lying east of Sullivan Road, the applicant will be required to construct the Sullivan Road improvement and interchange modifications which are scheduled for construction in order to accommodate Phase II of the proposal. 29. That Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road shall be constructed per the approved plans and typical roadway cross - section if properties east of Sullivan Road are included in Phase I. 30. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to function as a private road providing that the roadway is constructed in accordance with Spokane County public road standards and in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross - section. 31. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County road right -of -way from the County Engineer. No work will be performed within the County road right -of -way without a permit. 32. If Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This document provides the following: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County, Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Section 3.07, Sections A & B of that title. 33. The traffic generated by the proposed project will have a significant impact upon Sullivan Road between Interstate 90 and Sprague Avenue. It is anticipated that a two -way left turn lane will be needed to accommodate turning movements along the Sprague to I -90 corridor. This left turn lane will be required prior to the construction of Phase II. Prior to the commencement of Phase III, it will be necessary to improve Sullivan Road to a seven lane facility. The proposed Design Report for the Evergreen Interchange shall also include a review of traffic conditions along the Sullivan Road /I -90 corridor. The above specified roadway improvements shall be considered within that analysis. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to pay for the costs of right -of -way acquisition and roadway improvements along Sullivan between I -90 and Sprague for Phase II. Should other land development occur along the Sprague /I -90 Corridor which has measurable traffic impacts (i.e. large commercial or industrial uses) then a formula for participation in the sharing of costs for roadway improvements will be developed by the County Engineer. The formula will consider the traffic volumes generated by Sullivan Park Center as well as other identified traffic generators. For the Phase III improvements, a formula for the assessment of costs will be developed by the County Engineer in cooperation with the applicant. Of principal consideration in the development of the formula will be the traffic volumes generated by this project, traffic generated by other projects and other traffic utilizing the roadway. 34. That prior to the initiation of Phase II of the proposed development, the applicant will conduct an updated traffic study. This study may be included within the design report which will be prepared for the Evergreen Road Interchange. The Design Report shall also consider the impacts upon the County Road System of the extension of a connection to Mission Avenue from the proposed Evergreen Interchange. This analysis shall include potential traffic impacts upon Evergreen Road between Sprague Avenue and the connection. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) PHASE II Roadway construction and improvements for Phase II of the proposal shall be consistent with the improvements which have been identified within the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. Those improvements are as follows: 35. Construction and upgrading of the Sullivan Road - Indiana intersection in a manner consistent with the plans which have been improved by the Spokane County Engineer and the State of Washington Department of Transportation. 36. Construction of new freeway interchange at or near the alignment of Evergreen Road as identified within the Supplemental EIS. 37. Construction of Evergreen Road from Indiana Avenue southward to the proposed freeway interchange. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. 38. Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed Evergreen Road) shall be improved to a five -lane facility from Evergreen Road westerly to the connection with the existing Indiana Avenue. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. That Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed plat) must be widened to provide additional traffic lanes in order to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. A five lane facility is required to mitigate the traffic impacts upon Indiana Avenue and adjoining business properties. A plan for the upgrade of the intersection at Pines and Indiana must be submitted to the County Engineer as specified in condition #9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to secure the additional right -of -way for the improvement of Indiana Avenue. 39. Indiana Avenue (east of Sullivan Road) shall be constructed as a five -lane facility from Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus of the project. Indiana shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. 40. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to function as a private road, providing that the roadway is constructed in accordnace with Spokane County Public Road Standards in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross - section. 41. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County road right -of -way from the County Engineer. No work will be performed within the County road right -of -way without a permit. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 42. If Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This document provides the following: That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns mustiagree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road Improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Section 3.07, Sections A and B of that title. 43. Should the Evergreen Interchange Design Report determine that the level of improvements as specified within the Suplemental EIS are not necessary for Phase II, then the County Engineer may approve a phased plan for roadway construction or design deviations for Phase II roadway improvements. 44. That a public road Right -of -Way connection shall be provided to properties which are located to the south and east of Parcels #27 and #28 as depicted on the preliminary plat. This will require a redesign of the plat in this area. PHASE III 45. The roadway improvements for Phase III identified within the Supplemental EIS are the connection from the new freeway interchange at Evergreen Road southward to Mission Avenue and the possible connections northward and eastward of the proposal. The need for these improvements will be addressed in the development of the Evergreen Interchange Design Report. The level of improvements, assignment of financial responsibility for improvements and timing of construction will be determined on the basis of traffic volumes, location of facilities and traffic safety related issues. 46. Phase III improvements as identified by the Design Report shall be constructed prior to the commencement of Phase III construction. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Health District (COnt'd) 2. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage system shall not be authorized." 3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social & Health Services. 4. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 5. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation otr a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Connection to the Valley sewer system is to be made prior to release of occupancy permits for any structures within the site. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1. That the applicant obtain necessary approval from the Department of Transportation for each phase of the project prior to finalization. 2. That the applicant submit proof to the Planning Department file that Washington State Department of Transportation conditions have been satisfactorily handled prior to finalization of any portion of the preliminary plat. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County, Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Section 3.07, Sections A & B of that title. 33. The traffic generated by the proposed project will have a significant impact upon Sullivan Road between Interstate 90 and Sprague Avenue. It is anticipated that a two -way left turn lane will be needed to accommodate turning movements along the Sprague to I -90 corridor. This left turn lane will be required prior to the construction of Phase II. Prior to the commencement of Phase III, it will be necessary to improve Sullivan Road to a seven lane facility. The proposed Design Report for the Evergreen Interchange shall also include a review of traffic conditions along the Sullivan Road /I -90 corridor. The above specified roadway improvements shall be considered within that analysis. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to pay for the costs of right -of -way acquisition and roadway improvements along Sullivan between I -90 and Sprague for Phase II. Should other land development occur along the Sprague /I -90 Corridor which has measurable traffic impacts (i.e. large commercial or industrial uses) then a formula for participation in the sharing of costs for roadway improvements will be developed by the County Engineer. The formula will consider the traffic volumes generated by Sullivan Park Center as well as other identified traffic generators. For the Phase III improvements, a formula for the assessment of costs will be developed by the County Engineer in cooperation with the applicant. Of principal consideration in the development of the formula will be the traffic volumes generated by this project, traffic generated by other projects and other traffic utilizing the roadway. 34. That prior to the initiation of Phase II of the proposed development, the applicant will conduct an updated traffic study. This study may be included within the design report which will be prepared for the Evergreen Road Interchange. The Design Report shall also consider the impacts upon the County Road System of the extension of a connection to Mission Avenue from the proposed Evergreen Interchange. This analysis shall include potential traffic impacts upon Evergreen Road between Sprague Avenue and the connection. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) WASHINGTON STATE OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION 1. In the event that archaeological or historic resources are discovered during project activities, the applicant or successor shall notify the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation in Olympia, Washington. //O sit(G /4 198s Date / airp son // TO: BUILDING AND PLANNING • JANIES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM RECEIVED APR 08 1998 C o u SH N UUI I-Y ENGINEER A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads, Pat Harper Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads, Bill Hemmings Spokane County Division of Utilities, Jim Red Spokane County Division of Stormwater Utility, Steve Worley Spokane Regional Health District, Steve Holderby Spokane County Division of Buildings, Jeff Forry Spokane County Division of Parks, Recreation & Fair, Steve Horobiowski WA State Department of Transportation, Keith Martin Fire Protection District No. 1 Consolidated Irrigation District FROM: John W. Pederson 0 e Senior Planner DATE: April 8, 1998 SUBJECT: Extension of Time for PE- 1504 -85; Sullivan Park Center The Spokane County Division of Building & Planning has received the attached request for an Extension of Time to finalize the above - referenced plat. If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should be made a part of the preliminaryy plat approval, please forward comments to John Pederson by April 22, 1998. / Thank you. Enclosure c: Hanson Industries, Inc., Applicant/Owner, 15102 E. Indiana Ave., Spokane, WA 99216 John Konen, Agent, David Evans & Associates, 110 W. Cataldo, Spokane, WA 99201 Simpson Engineering, 909 N. Argonne Rd., Spokane, WA 99212 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 PHONE: (509) 456 -3675 • FAX: (509) 4564703 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION 01? BUILDING& PLANNING EXTENSION 01? TIME APPLICATION FILE NO.: PE- 1504 -85 Owner: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: Applicant /Sponsor: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: Surveyor: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: pre 3- 31 -9d DATE OCT OF TIME REQMSIrn Hanson Industries, Inc. 15102 E. Indiana Avenue Spokane, Washington 99216 509.922.5252 Fax: 509.922.5757 Hanson Industries, Inc. Simpson Engineers,. Inc. 909 N. Argonne Road. No. of lots originally approved: 42 Spokane, Washington 99212 No. of lots remaining to be finalized: 2 4 No. of acres remaining to date: NO. OF LOTS: 42 15102 E. Indiana Avenue Spokane, Washington 99216 509.922.5252 Fax: 509.922.5757 509.926.1322 Fax: 509.926.1323 Has any portion of the plat, short plat or BSP been finalized? (Recorded with the Auditor) Approx. 132 acres of the preliminary plat was filed 4/26/90 with road improvements bonded. The public road system (Indiana Ave.) was constructed and completed in 1997 together with 1.5 miles extending westerly to Pines Rd. The Jllll Park Mall and other retail businesses have been established within the 2. Has a proposed final plat, short plat or BSP been submitted to the Division of Building and Planning? completed plat. Yes No X If no, why has the plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized? In 1997 approx. 6.5 acres of the original preliminary plat was dedicated and improved to Spokane Co. standards for Indiana Ave. west of the filed plat. .Such improvements extended west to Pines Rd. for a total construction of almost 2.25 miles of new public roads to serve the area. On 3/26/98, approx. 9 acres of the original plat were included with existing parcels to the south to provide five Assessor's Parcels • -r the Certificate of Exe •tion •rocess (CE- 122 -98 Approx. 52 acres • iminary p at 0 s east relnovin this invento from the of Sullivan Rd. renain to be platted into an• approx. acres a•3oining e u ure ergreen Interchange 3. What progress has occurred? What conditions of approval have been completed (such as survey work, I -90 remain to improvements constructed, departmental approvals obtained)? The applicants have be platted for worked with state and local officials to secure funding for the Ever- business uses. •' -- - ange o assure e projec e• ase por ion o e project. { 1 f d avail Lc) au� i un cunt) eLlun of design completed Indiana Ave. in ant; ; wr;on of Pha 11 s f and a ^ °rOCRg design for the Evergreen Interchange will help dictate the configuration of the final plat adjoining said interchange. Water lines, six sewer extensions, and Sullivan Interchange/ Indiana improvements have been provided to allow future final platting east of Sullivan Road. 4. Is this a phased project? Yes X No If yes, please complete the following information: No. of phases finalized to date: oiR• v SIGNATURE OF OWNER 1 80 PLEASE SUBMIT THIS FORM ALONG WITH THE REQUIRED TIME EXTENSION FEE TO THE DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING SPOKANE COUNTY APR 1 1998 )IVI5i0N OF BUILDING ANl PLANNING March 31, 1998 Mr. John Todd Spokane County Division of Building and Planning 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Subject: Request for Extension of Time Sullivan Park Center PE- 1504 -85 Dear John, Sta Profes ilnais ° Outs 9 , ;10„ DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, West no Cataldo Spokane, Washington 99201 Tel: 509.327.8697 Fax: 5 3 I have enclosed the "Extension of Time" application for the above referenced Sullivan Park Center preliminary play (PE- 1504 -85) together with other supplemental letters and exhibits. As noted in the request, approximately 80 acres remain to be completed as a final plat of the 225 acres originally proposed in 1985. This includes approximately 52 acres north of Interstate -90 and east of Sullivan Road and approximately 28 acres west of the Sullivan Park Mall adjoining the future Evergreen Interchange, Interstate 90. Both of these sites are scheduled for final plat submittals when funding and construction approvals have been secured for the Evergreen Interchange. Extensive infrastructure has been constructed in anticipation of completing the final plat(s) for the remaining areas. Pursuant to the Extension of Time criteria listed per Section 12.100.118, there have been "no significant changed conditions which would render filing of the plat contrary to the public health, safety or general welfare." The applicant has been working with Spokane County and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to secure funding matches for the Evergreen Interchange. This process has delayed the completion of the scheduled Phase 11 final plat. I note that approximately 132 acres of the preliminary plat was filed in April 1990 and the previously bonded road system was completed in 1997. To accommodate this plat, the Sullivan Interchange /Indiana Avenue was improved per WSDOT requirements, Indiana Avenue was extended to Pines Road approximately 1.5 miles west of the final plat boundary, and utility infrastructure and drainage facilities were provided to serve the plat and allow completion and extension for the remainder of the preliminary plat areas. A drawing prepared by Simpson Engineers, Inc. illustrates the relationship of such improvements and the remaining areas to be platted. These infrastructure improvements "form a unified development consistent with the original approval." The preliminary subdivision "remains consistent with the original plat that was approved." The final configuration of the preliminary plat adjoining the Evergreen Interchange can not be determined until the final ramp designs and lane configurations have been established in conjunction with the new interchange construction project. Sewer and water services have been extended to serve the preliminary plat east of Sullivan Road. Extensive surveying and improvements have been installed to construct Indiana Avenue between Sullivan and CE Mr. John Todd April 1, 1998 Page 2 aeW e" fs Road together with interchange improvements east of Sullivan Road. These facilities were installed in anticipation of completing the preliminary plat. A portion of the preliminary plat located in Section 10 can be removed from the final plat process because Indiana Avenue including utilities has been constructed to serve the subject properties. Hanson Industries, Inc. obtained properties south of these Indiana Avenue frontages and aggregated them using the Certificate of Exemption process (see CE- 122.98 A -E). The lot configurations previously indicated on the preliminary plat within Section 10 have been enhanced through the Certificate of Exemption process because landlocked parcels outside of the plat now have frontage on Indiana Avenue and are of a size and depth for improved marketability. The applicant has participated in numerous ongoing studies to identify transportation needs associated with the Evergreen Interchange improvement and roadway extensions to improve traffic circulation in the area. Indiana Avenue was extended west to Pines Road ahead of the phasing schedule to improve traffic circulation. Administrative delays were caused by earlier failures of the State legislature to fund the governmental match necessary to construct the Evergreen Interchange. It appears that these monies are now appropriated and final design and construction of this vital improvement can proceed. No new conditions should be imposed on this project as a result of these administrative delays. The applicant has exercised due diligence to reduce these delays and should not have conditions added which would increase the costs or the time required to complete the project. Hanson Industries, Inc. is requesting a three year extension to allow completion of the remaining 80 acres in a final plat format. Early consideration and response is herein requested to assure that private funding commitments to the Evergreen Interchange can be expedited. If you have further questions, please call Mr. Bob Boyle, Hanson Industries, Inc. at 922 -5252. Sincerely, DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, Inc. Enclosure RAHHC0005 K/r0000331.Itr John D. Konen Development Consultant Outstandi Profesi?ogd 1x,10utstandrngQuatityt DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, TN :CAE V• Ana.^• m ::a::.- :u,::::mn:::vinorm ..:ms .r: Preliminary Plot Rood Dedicated aa ,nr.:mmc:::r:1=;1lliFT :: . i Preliminory Plot Excluded from Plat (CE's) _L — — — — — 1 — — — — Preliminary Plot of SULLIVAN PARK CENTER Rood Dedicated Sullivan Rood Rood Dedicated — T II I ciCra 4 I March 31, 1998 John Konen David Evans & Associates, Inc. West 110 Cataldo Spokane, WA 99201 Dear John: Hanson Industries. Inc. has incurred significant financial expenses in providing improvements for this plat. All of these expenses have occurred in reliance of the plat entitlements and for meeting the Conditions of Approval. Hanson Industries. Inc. has spent over Ten Million dollars ($10,000,000.00) to date for the following improvements: Please contact the undersigned for any additional information. HANSON INDUSTRIES INC. 15102 =5z5a • " Fa " 1509;922.5]57 W "99216 ttttp9/www. nansonind.com Sin ely, Dan Chambers Construction Manager RE: SULLIVAN PARK CENTER P.E.1504 -85 Buildings Earthwork/Landscaping Electrical/Lighting Engineering /Land Use /Reports Roads Underground Utilities Kimball, Sandy From: Hemmings, Bill Sent: Thursday, April 09, 1998 7:40 AM To: Pederson, John Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Harper, Pat; Kimball, Sandy; Busko, Doug; Miller, Katherine Subject: P 1504 -85 - Sullivan Park Center - Time Extension Request 4 -9 -98 I received the above referenced time extension request on April 8, 1998. I recommend a condition of approval that the latest editions of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction and The Guidelines for Stormwater Management be used for the design of any required improvements. Eiee gem u4t Page 1 ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW Douglas S. Adams Subdivision Administrator Spokane County Planning Dept. Broadway Center Building N. 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Doug: Re: Sullivan Park Center January 27, 1989 S. 1401 GRANO BLVD.. SUITE 203 NORTH (509) 458-5100 FAX (509) 458 -5114 Per our telephone conversation this date, I would like to clarify a few items with you. First of all, the minutes of the final platting conference (of December 19, 1988, states in part "The Evergreen freeway interchange is to be conceptually approved prior to the July 28 deadline." Although we would like to receive conceptual approval prior to the July 28 deadline, it is not a legal requirement of our agreement with Price Development Company, and I wanted to be sure that the County agencies are aware of this fact. Practically speaking, we need to receive the conceptual approval in order to obtain a plat of more than just the property to be sold to Price and for this reason we are using our very best efforts to obtain this conceptual approval of the Evergreen freeway interchange. The next issue concerns the Riparian Park. Sam Angove, the County Parks Director, has informed Don Johns of RAHCO that the County Parks Department would accept a deed to the property and then construct its own improvements. This is more acceptable to ( q'�@ Mr. Hanson for the reason that the County Parks Department would then bear the cost and responsibility for planning and /ye constructing the improvements on Riparian Park. You indicated in 'V�10/ our telephone conversation this date that if this was indeed going to be the arrangement, then we would need to formalize an agreement for the County Parks Department to receive deeds to this land as part of the final plat. You further indicated that ` the County Commissioners would probabaly then have to approve the Doug Adams January 27, 1989 Page Two acceptance of these deeds. As I indicated to you, the County Engineers want to speak with Sam Angove to see what he has in mind for the Riparian Park. Their concern is that if he plans to 2 use the Riparian Park as a staging area for access to the Centennial Trial, then there may be a need for more parking and there would also be increased traffic to be taken into consideration. Would you please advise if there are any other concerns in this area that need to be addressed. Thank you. DMB /slm cc: RAHCO Very uly you s, DREW M. BODKER Attorney at Law 114 VICTOR H. BISHOP P.E. President Mr. Tom P. May 1120 Paulson Building Spokane, WA 99210 Ee Su llivan Park Ce�Spokane, WA Dear Mr. May: Per your request I have reviewed several of the environmen- tal documents for the Sullivan Park Center, including: 1) Amended Notice of Public Hearing, dated December 24, 1985 2) Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Findings and Order, dated November 19, 1985 3) Final Addendum to Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Sullivan Park Center, dated September 20, 1985 4) Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Sullivan Park Center, dated June 21, 1985 5) Master Plan for Development for Sullivan Park Center, dated September, 1985 6) Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Sullivan Park Center, Volume 1, dated September, 1980 7) Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Volume 2, Technical Appendix, dated September 16, 1980. After a brief review of these various documents, I have come to conclusions with respect to the adequacy of these documents in three basic areas. The three areas are One, The ability of the proposed transportation improvements on Interstate 90 to meet the Federal Highway Administration design standards for Interstate highways. Two, an apparent error in the application of standard Trip Generation data resulting in understating the potential traf- fic congestion. Three, confusion within County Engineering Department Condition of Approval number nine of the Hearing Examiner Committee's Findings and Order dated November 19, 1985. I FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION STANDARDS ON INTERSTATE HIGHWAYS The draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS) and the Conditions of Approval, both by the County Engineer Department and the Washington State Department of Transportation all clearly indicate that substantial revisions to the Interstate highway system (I -90) and its ramps and inter- changes will be required for the first and second phases of t om( ri ( E TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 - 112th AVENUE N.E, SUITE 110 - BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 TELEPHONE 455 -5320 - AREA CODE 208 January 23, 1986 RECEIVED JAN 2 7 1986 COUNTY COMM4?CmNTRS 21242- •Ot „i . re, e. dr:41 x el)/ b z 0 0 V AN-t-Aat--e 4t. • e.- t,v-e-e_S2 1 . a 954; S r le 7 7 a" S 4 4 X 33 a 5 *4; E54 e 9-14.744--ede'rne-.C4--eytaz S /9.62 spa.= - CW4.■,,oz") 4.; r- NI\ Li-1 Vt-1/414 L_ tO • ) 7:4 ? • . . 11 AO ., ... .'it.‘,.. 1 • '" • • • • • •• -5€?;!?,e.41.„' • , . 9g , " • - • • • ON' abe. c rAt c7; 7-57a, • Mr. Tom P. May Sullivan Park Center Jan. 23, 1986 Page 2 • this project. In addition, the third phase will require addition- al County road connections to the proposed new interchange at Evergreen Avenue. Appendix A of the DSEIS contains two letters from the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) dated June 21, 1984 and October 3, 1984. For phase 1 of the pro- ject, the WSDOT concurs that the "Slip Ramps" from the Sullivan Road interchange westbound on /off -ramps to Indiana Avenue will be required to maintain satisfactory traffic operations. The WSDOT also specifically indicates that the WSDOT does not have the fi- nal say on the acceptability of these ramps. Rather, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is the final reviewing agency with respect to design standards for interstate highways. The second paragraph of page 2 of the October 3, 1984 letter from Walter R. Horning, District Administrator of WSDOT to Mike Teramoto specif- ically addresses the FHWA approval requirement. The sketches of Figure 7 and 8 of the DSEIS show schematical- ly how these crucial "Slip ramps" might work for the Phase 1 traf- fic projections. The FHWA will require that these schematic sketches be converted to specific hardline proposed drawings with scale dimensions that meet all design standards for the inter- state highway system. While the WSDOT has approved the concept in general, they have not approved the specific design as they do not have that authority until FHWA review and approval. It is very possible that substantial changes to the alignment of the slip ramps will be required when all FHWA and WSDOT design stan- dards are applied to these ramps. This could dramatically affect the required right -of -way for the ramps and the spacing of the slip ramps with respect to Sullivan Road. All references in the Conditions of Approval where the WSDOT is identified with the in- terstate highway system should include the FHWA approval in the language. As the DSEIS, WSDOT and the Conditions of Approval all agree that the interchange modifications are required for Phase 1, no action of construction should start until the FHWA has approved the modified Sullivan Road interchange plan with the slip ramps. Phase 2 of the project requires the construction of the new Evergreen Interchange on Interstate 90. The WSDOT and FHWA have had a long- standing basic guideline that interchanges on the in- terstate highway system should be spaced no closer than one mile apart. The distance between Pines Road and Sullivan Road is ap- proximately 1.9 miles. The proposed location of the Evergreen Interchange is .8 miles west of the Sullivan Road interchange. Mr. Tom P. May Sullivan Park Center Jan. 23, 1986 Page 3 This appears to violate the guideline as established by WSDOT and FHWA for spacing of interstate highway interchanges. This spac- ing guideline is established specifically to avoid the problem of weaving traffic between on -and off -ramps at adjacent inter- changes. It is highly desirable to let one interchange traffic get totally straightened out before the next interchange is upon them, and the FHWA has strenuously adhered to these standards ex- cept in Central Business Districts of major cities. The slip ramp from Indiana Avenue to the westbound on -ramp required for Phase 1 of this project will of necessity have the effect of lengthening the on -ramp requirements by 500 to 1000 feet to accommodate the merging and weaving traffic associated with the slip ramp before merging with the westbound through lanes on the freeway. This lengthening of the westbound on -ramp from Sullivan Road will have the effect of making the next inter- change to the west closer than normal because of the length of the ramp. Again referring to the October 3, 1984 WSDOT letter in Appendix A of the DSEIS, it is important to remember that while WSDOT will recommend approval of the second access point to serve the area, they do not have the final authority; rather FHWA has the final authority and approvals of the second phase must be withheld until FHWA approves of the interstate highway modifica- tions required by the slip ramps and the Evergreen Interchange. This concept must be included in the Conditions of Approval for the project. It is clear from the DSEIS that without approval of the Evergreen Interchange, Phase 2 of the project cannot proceed with- out drastic effect on the transportation system and should be denied. II TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Reference is made to several items in the DSEIS including Table I page 4, the trip generation section and Table IV on page 21, Capacity Analysis section and Table V on page 26, Table VI on page 29, Table VII on page 30, and the Traffic Volume Projections of Appendix B. Also, pages 14 and 15 of the September, 1985 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. Mr. Tom P. May Sullivan Park Center Jan. 23, 1986 Page 4 Trip generation for major projects is determined on a daily basis and on a PM peak hour basis as is done for this project. The data for the PM peak hour is the primary analysis data for evaluating the arterial street system and its intersections. The evaluation of the intersections and streets is identified as the "Capacity Analysis" evaluation. This evaluation results in iden- tification of the "Level of Service" of intersections. Level of Service D has been used in these reports as an acceptable level of service whereas level of service E has been determined to be unacceptable. The breaking point between level of service D and E is a volume to capacity (V /C) ratio of .90. A value between .80 and .89 is level of service D and a value between .90 and 1.0 is level of service E. The levels of service Tables V, VI, VII, of the DSEIS and on page 15 of the Final SEIS all indicate that the intersection of Sullivan Road and Indiana Avenue is projected to operate with a V/C ratio of .89, which is identified as level of service D. (Page 15 of the FSEIS carries the V/C ratio one decimal point further and indicates that with Phase 1 (with Industrial) the Sullivan Road at Indiana intersection will oper- ate at .883.) Please note that in all cases this intersection is one hundredth of a point (.01) away from an unacceptable level of service E operation at this critical intersection. Paragraph 2 of page 21 of the DSEIS identifies future gener- ation of 1200 outbound trips in the PM peak for the alternative to Phase 1. The derivation of this number is not shown in the DSEIS but is shown on page 14 of the Final SEIS. A review of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) document Trip Generation - An Informational Report (Third Edition) together with pages 16 through 19 of a complementary report identified as Using the ITE Trip Generation Report, July, 1984 by Carl H. Buttke, P.E., which is an official document of ITE, indicates that the ITE trip generation data for the PM peak period has been misapplied for the regional center as identified in the table on page 14 of the Final SEIS. When properly applied, the ITE trip generation report would change the number of trips in the PM peak for in and out of both the office alternative Phase 1 and the industrial /office alterna- tive Phase 1 from 922 trips to 1140 trips during the peak hour, or a 20 percent increase in the regional center PM peak in and out trips. This would make the value on page 21 of the DSEIS of 1200 trips increase to 1360 trips. These site generated traffic volumes are the most significant traffic volumes at the intersec- tion of Indiana Ave. and Sullivan Road as shown on the traffic III Mr. Tom P. May Sullivan Park Center Jan. 23, 1986 Page 5 projection figures in Appendix B. For instance, in Phase 1 the northbound left- turning volume from Sullivan Road to Indiana Avenue increases from twenty (20) vehicles per hour without the project to five hundred eighty -three (583) vehicles per hour with the project. Similarly the eastbound left -turn from Indiana Ave. to northbound Sullivan Road increases from 6 to 170 trips respectively without and with the project. These are critical movements when evaluating the level of service for an intersection such as this one. An increase in the projected traffic volumes in the range of ten to twenty percent will significantly affect the capacity calculations and push this critical intersection into level of service E operation for both of the alternative Phase 1 development scenarios and for the Phase 2 and 3 scenarios. Given the above rationale of trip generation and capacity analysis, it is clear that the first phase of the project should be denied until: 1) The FHWA has approved the slip ramp concept, and 2) a reevaluation of the traffic projections and traffic anal- ysis can show that a level of service D or better operation can be attained at the intersection of Sullivan Road and Indiana Avenue. III COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT CONDITION OF APPROVAL - NUMBER 9 This condition of approval is an extremely important condi- tion and is extremely vague and confusing. All references to State Highway Department should be revised to Washington State Department of Transportation; In addition, the first sentence re- fers to "The proposed state highway /county road intersection" without identifying which intersection this is. Is this the in- tersection of Sullivan Road at I -90 which is a "interchange" or is this another WSDOT /County Road intersection? The County Engineer Department Condition of Approval Number 38, paragraph 3 refers to condition number 9 and is talking about the upgrade of an intersection at Pines and Indiana. Pines Road south of I -90 is State Highway 27 and could be construed to be the State Highway /County Road intersection referred to in condition 9, yet nowhere in the DSEIS or these other conditions is improvements at Pine Road and Indiana identified or traffic volumes shown for that intersection. Condition of Approval number 9 refers to a "design proposal" for the intersection (Interchange ?). County Engineer Conditions of Approval numbers 33, 34, 43, 45 and 46 all refer to a "Design Report" which is an officially recognized document by the WSDOT and FHWA and refers to the Evergreen. Interchange in those �IG Mr. Tom P. May Sullivan Park Center Jan. 23, 1986 Page 6 conditions of approval. Is the "design proposal" of Condition 9 the same Design Report? If so, it should be more specific and say so. Condition 9 appears to be the place where the applicant is required to prepare the Design Report at his cost. If that is not the case and Condition 9 is really referring to Pines Road and Indiana Avenue, then it does not appear that the Conditions of Approval require the applicant to bear the cost of the Sullivan Road interchange revisions or the Evergreen interchange Design Reports. This should be cleared up, including the refer- ence to Pines Road and Indiana Avenue at Condition of Approval number 38. It is my opinion that the Preliminary Subdivision and Zone Reclassification for the Sullivan Park Center should be denied un- til the above items are adequately reviewed by the County and pro- visions made for the appropriate level of approval of interstate highway changes at the Federal Highway Administration level. Further, it is important to assure the County that this project will not result in unacceptable level of service E traffic oper- ations at the Sullivan Road intersection with Indiana Avenue. VHB /mb Enclosure Very truly yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC ( Victor H. Bishop, P.E., President Using the' ITE Trip Generation Report Institute of Transportation Engineers 525 School Street, S.W., Suite 410 Washington, D.C. 20024 -2729 (202) 554-8050 PREPARED BY Carl H. Buttke, P.E., July 1984 16 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS is no measure of confidence of the average rates. In some cases, the average weekday vehicle trip end rates are plotted and in other cases, linear equations are provided. The Permanent Committee will attempt to clarify the area of confidence in the use of average rates. Limited Sample Size For some uses, the sample size of the rate data is very limited. The Permanent Committee published all of the collected data including rates from only one study. Therefore, the user must be cautioned to use the rates with care when the sample size is less than three studies. Notes have been printed on most rate tables where the sample size is less than three, cautioning the user to use the rates carefully. The sample size is always noted on the rate tables. Referring to Figure 3, second to last column titled, "Number of Studies" indicates the number of studies utilized to calculate the respective rate. The last column indicates the average size of the generator or independent variable for each of the studies. COMMON MISTAKES IN USE OF TRIP GENERATION REPORT The following describes the most common mis- takes made when using the Trip Generation Report. Use of Report as a Manual There appears to be an increasing misuse of Trip Generation by thinking of it as a manual and as the sole source of trip generation rates from which there can be no deviation. Communities have adopted or- dinances or requirements for traffic impact state- ments which require that the trip generation esti- mates must be based only on the rates contained in the Trip Generation Report and that no adjustments may be made to those rates. The Trip Generation Report was never intended to be used in this manner. The Permanent Committee attempted to guard against this misuse by writing a section in the report introduction called "Use of Report." It states that the report is intended to be a guide in estimating the number of trips which may be generated by a specific building or land use. It further states that one may wish to modify the gen- eration rates because of public transportation ser- vice, ridesharing, proximity to other developments, or because of special characteristics of the site and the surrounding area. The Trip Generation Report addresses the issues of adjusting the rates for various reasons which will be described in more detail later. Also, there are other sources of trip generation rate data which have not been obtained by the Per- manent Committee and therefore are not presented in Trip Generation. These data could have been col- lected since publication of Trip Generation, or could be specific to a certain community or development and should also be utilized to provide the best esti- mate of traffic impact. To resolve this problem, it is recommended that local ordinances or requirements refer to Trip Gen- eration as a source of data, but not limit the data source to only the rates contained therein. Further- more, if the data sample is very limited in the Trip Generation Report, the transportation engineer should have the capability to collect additional rate data to increase the sample size on which the esti- mates will be based. Peak Hour Entering and Exiting Trips Not Adjusted One of the most common mistakes made when using Trip Generation is not to adjust the peak hour entering and exiting rates to equal the total peak hour rate. The failure to make this adjustment gen- erally will result in a low estimate of the peak hour entering and exiting site traffic. The recommended procedure for making this adjustment is described on page 13 of this monograph and on the first page of instructions in Trip Generation. Misuse of Variable Rates Another common mistake is made when calculat- ing the generation for a shopping center or office building which has variable rates. Often, the rates are obtained directly from one of the rate tables which contain only the average rates for the entire group size rather than obtaining the rates from the variable rate curve or by interpolating between rate tables for the appropriate size building. As an example, the trip generation will be calcu- lated the wrong way and the correct way for an office building containing 75,000 gross square feet of building space: COMMON MISTAKE Referring to the following rate table for General Office, Under 100,000 G.S.F., ITE Land Use Code 711, a common mistake is to use these rates directly, as follows: 24 Hour Two -Way Volume: 75 x 17.7 = 1,328 Vehicle Trip Ends A.M. Peak Hour Enter (7 -9 A.M.): 75 x 1.45 = 109 vehicle trips SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use /Building Independent Type General .Offi ilnder 100,00n G.S.F. ITE Land Use Code Area 711 Variable -Trips per _Von Grnas Square Feet of Rid 1ding Average Trip Rate Maximum Rate Minimum Rate Correlation Coefficient Number of Studies Average Size of Independent Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 17 7 28 A 8 8 20 5n 2 Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic A.M. Between 7 and 9 Enter 1.45 1.90 1.28 3 24.3 Exit 0.25 0. AS1.15 3 24.3 Total 2.50 3.79 1.40 15 41.9 P.M. Between 4 and 6 Enter 0.19 0.70 0.06 3 2 Exit 1.14 2 82 2 An 6.39 0 74 0 An 3 17 24. 45 7 Total Peak Hour of Generator A.M. Enter 2.23 3.31 1.29 5 47.0 Exit 0.45 1 n4 0 16 5 147 n Total 2 92 5 98 1 414 17 49 6 P.M. Enter 0 36 1 88 n 7n 3 19 n 114 0 42 5 5 147 n 47 0 Exit Total 2 ..1311___6_,,3.9 1 1 12 0 6 .1A in 51 it h2 6 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 2 it Peak Hour of Generator Enter Exit Total n 114 n 7.3 n ') n 0.2 5 10 511 4 1 12.6 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends Enter 1.2 Peak Hour of Generator Exit Total 0.18 0. 37 0.06 1 5 58.4 Source Numbers 5, 21 54, 72, 88, 89 92, 98. 100 ITE Technical Committee 6A -6 -Trip Generation Rates Date 19 G.S.F. = Gross Square Feet of Building Area Figure 6. Summary of Trip Generation Rates: Land Use Code 711 USIN4 CHE TRIP GENERATION REPORT 17 • 18 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION eNGINEERS A.M. Peak Hour Exit (7 -9 A.M.): 75 x 0.25 = 19 vehicle trips P.M. Peak Hour Enter (4 -6 P.M.): 75 x 0.19 = 14 vehicle trips P.M. Peak Hour Exit (4 -6 P.M.): 75 x 1.14 = 86 vehicle trips Notice that the rates were used directly from the rate table and were not adjusted to reflect a 75,000 gross square foot building and the peak hour enter- ing and exiting rates were not adjusted to equal the total. The general office building average weekday vehicle trip ends rate varies with size of building, as shown on Figure 4. The rates shown on the rate table for General Office, Under 100,000 G.S.F. are the weighted average for all buildings under 100,000 G.S.F. (Figure 6). The average rates reflect an aver- age size building of 50,200 G.S.F. as indicated in the last column under "Average Size of Independent Variable /Study." In this case, it is 50.2 thousand gross square feet. CORRECT METHOD: The correct method is as follows: Refer to Figure 4 and obtain the average weekday vehicle trip ends rate from the curve for a 75,000 G.S.F. Building. This rate is 16.2 AWDVTE /T.G.S.F. (T.G.S.F. = Thousand Gross Square Feet). 24 -Hour Two -Way Volume: 75 x 16.2 = 1,216 AWDVTE A.M. Peak Hour Enter (7 -9 A.M.): Obtain rate from rate table and correct for enter/ exit equal total and correct for size. Correct Enter Rate: 1.45 - (1.45 + 0.25) x 2.50 = 2.13 Correct Rate for Size: 2 . 13 x16.2 =17.7 =1.95 Enter Volume: 75 x 1.95 = 146 vehicle trips A.M. Peak Hour Exit (7 -9 A.M.): Correct Exit Rate: 0 =( +0.25)x2.50 =0.37 Correct Rate for Size: 0.37 x 16.2 _ 17.7 = 0.34 Exit Volume: 75 x 0.34 = 26 vehicle trips P.M. Peak Hour Enter (4 -6 PM.): Correct Enter Rate: 0 =( +1.14)x2.82 =0.40 Correct for Size: 0.40 x 16.2_ 17.7 = 0.37 Enter Volume: 75 x 0.37 = 28 vehicle trips P.M. Peak Hour Exit (4 -6 P.M.): Correct Exit Rate: 1 + +1.14)x2.82 =2.42 Correct for Size: 2 . 42 x16.2 =17.7 =2.21 Exit Volume: 75 x 2.21 = 165 vehicle trips Notice the difference between the calculated trips using the incorrect method and using the correct method. For shopping centers, ITE Land Use Codes 820 to 828, the Trip Generation Report recommends that one interpolate by size of center among the appro- priate rate tables. Interpolating is recommended because a rate curve, as shown on Figure 5, was not suggested in Trip Generation. An example calcula- tion for shopping centers is shown in Section IV. Improper Adjustments for Effects of Alternative Modes A mistake is often made when adjusting trip rates from Trip Generation to reflect different transit usage or different vehicle occupancy. Often, the trip rates are adjusted across the board by a percentage to reflect a different modal split. For example, if the expected transit usage is to be 10 percent for employees at an office building, the in- correct method is to reduce all the rates by 10 per- cent. The correct method is to reduce only the home -based work (H.B.W.) trips by 10 percent. Example calculations for different building types are contained in Section IV. I Ott cam- cg z k g /5/ t6 -Lt eyn iq A "EstcIs - -.tom 0 IV. Example Calculations This last section contains example calculations in- dicating the suggested methods for estimating trip generation for shopping centers and how to adjust for alternative modes. SHOPPING CENTERS (ITE Land Use Codes 820 -828) PROBLEM: Calculate the 24 -hour two -way vehicle trips for a typical weekday as well as the P.M. peak hour (4:30 to 5:30 P.M.) entering and exiting traffic for a 180,000 gross leasable square foot ( G.L:S.F.) shop- ping center. SOLUTION: Refer to Trip Rate Tables for ITE Land Use Codes 822 and 823 (Figures 7 and 8). Check that peak hour entering and exiting rates equal total and adjust, if necessary. Determine rates for 180,000 G.L.S.F. shopping center by interpolating betweeq raja and average scenter.of the two adjacent size categories. In this case, the two adjacent size categories are for ITE Land Use Code 822, with an average size center of 149,000 G.L.S.F. and Code 823 with an average size center of 235,000 G.L.S.F. (Av- erage Size Independent Variable /Study for Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends). Determine 24 -Hour Two -Way Rate: 149 T.G.L.S.F. = 66.7 235 T.G.L.S.F. = 50.6 Therefore by interpolation: 180 T.G.L.S.F. = 60.9 (T.G.L.S.F. = Thousand Gross Leasable Square Feet) Determine P.M. Peak Hour (4 -6 P.M.) Rates: 1. Adjust entering and exiting trips ITE Land Use Code 822 Enter: 2.9 + (2.9 + 3.1) x 5.9 = 2.85 Exit: 3.1 + (2.9 + 3.1) x 5.9 = 3.05 ITE Land Use Code 823 Enter: 2.1 - (2.1 + 2.2) x 4.8 = 2.34 Exit: 2.2 =(2.1 +2.2)x4.8 =2.46 2. Interpolation for a Rate 14ZW3TGLSF = 2.85 �.�z X261 T.G.L.S.F. = 2.34 f 01. in* out 19 Therefore by interpolation: 180 T.G.L.S.F. = 4-64- 2 (o (c 3. Interpolation for Exiting Rate 142 T.G.L.S.F. = 3.05 = 2.46 Therefore by interpolation: 180 T.G.L.S.F. - 284 2. St Determine Driveway Volumes: 24 -Hour Two-Way Volume: 180 x 60.9 = 10,962 vehicle trip ends P.M. Peak Hour Enter: 180 x 2.6S= 4 vehicle trips P.M. Peak Hour Eza: 180 x 2.81 51.3'vehicle trips 011 Another calculation method for the P.M. peak hour trips, which is slightly faster but probably not quite as accurate, would be to calculate the peak hour entering and exiting rates as a ratio of the 24 -hour two -way rate for the Land Use Code Rate Table which best describes the shopping center and apply that same ratio to the new calculated 24 -hour rate. For example: The 180,000 G.L.S.F. center is ITE Land Use Code 822. The corrected P.M. peak hour rates as a ratio of the 24 -hour rate are as follows: Enter Ratio: 2.85 ± 66.7 = 0.43 Exit Ratio: 3.05 =66.7 =0.46 P.M. Peak Hour Enter: 180 x 60.9 x 0.43 = 471 vs. 484 vehicle trips P.M. Peak Hour Exit: 180 x 60.9 x 0.46 = 504 vs. 515 vehicle trips The second method results in nearly the same number of trips and is slightly less time - consuming. The rationale behind this method is that the peaking characteristics of each category of shopping center would remain the same rather than interpolating between categories for the peaking characteristics. However, when at the borderline of size between categories, it would probably be better to interpo- late to avoid abrupt changes in peaking characteris- tics because of a very small change in size of center. i 22 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION totGINEERS ADJUSTMENT FOR ALTERNATIVE MODES The adjustments for alternative modes primarily affect the home -based work (H.B.W.) trips. There- fore, the following example calculations will adjust the rates because of a change in the H.B.W. trip mode for residential, industrial, and office land uses. An understanding of these examples would then provide the technique for adjusting trips for other land uses. SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOUSING (ITE Land Use Code 210) PROBLEM: . Calculate the 24 -hour two -way and A.M. (7 -9 A.M.) and P.M. (4 -6 P.M.) peak hour entering and exiting rates as a result of a 10 percent transit rider- ship and an average vehicle occupancy of 1.45 per- sons per vehicle for H.B.W. trips. Use dwelling unit as the independent variable. SOLUTION: Refer to Trip Rate Table for ITE Land Use Code 210 (Figure 9). Check that entering and exiting rates equal the total peak hour 'rates. Adjust the H.B.W. trip. The trip rate data have been calculated primarily from measurements at subdivisions where there was no transit service. The average H.B.W. trip ve- hicle occupancy is assumed to be 1.35 persons per vehicle. The H.B.W. vehicle trip ends are assumed to be 20 percent of the 24 -hour vehicle trip ends. 24 -Hour Trip Ends Rate Adjustment: H.B.W. Vehicle Trips: 10 x 0.2 = 2 vehicle trip ends /day Adjust for 10 percent transit usage: 2 x 0.9 = 1.8 vehicle trip ends /day Adjust for 1.45 persons per vehicle: 1.8 x 1.35 + 1.45 = 1.68 vehicle trip ends /day Total 24 -Hour Rate: 1.68 + 8.0 = 9.68 vehicle trip ends /day A.M. Peak Hour Rate: Enter: No adjustment, assume no work trips = 0.21 vehi- cle trips /D.U. Exit: Assume 90 percent of exit traffic for work pur- poses: ' 0.55 x 0.90 = 0.50 vehicle trips Adjust for transit: 0.50 x 0.9 = 0.45 vehicle trips Adjust for vehicle occupancy: 0.45 x 1.35 + 1.45 = 0.42 vehicle trips Total Exit Rate: 0.42 + 0.05 = 0.47 vehicle trips /D.U. P.M. Peak Hour Rate: Enter: Assume 67 percent of entering trips are H.B.W.: 0.63 x 0.67 = 0.42 vehicle trips Adjust for transit: 0.42 x 0.9 = 0.38 Adjust for vehicle occupancy: 0.38 x 1.35 ± 1.45 = 0.35 Total Enter Rate: 0.35 + (0.63 - 0.42) = 0.56 vehicle trips /D.U. Exit: Assume no work trips: 0.37 vehicle trips /D.U. Contparison of Rates: No With Adjust- Adjust - ments ments , Change 24 -Hour Two -Way Rate 10.0 9.68 - 3.2 A.M. Peak Hour Enter 0.21 0.21 0 A.M. Peak Hour Exit 0.55 0.47 -14.5 P.M. Peak Hour Enter 0.63 0.56 -11.1 P.M. Peak Hour Exit 0.37 0.37 0 INDUSTRIAL PARK (ITE Land Use Code 130) PROBLEM: Calculate the 24 -hour two -way and A.M. (7 -9 A.M.) and P.M. (4 -6 P.M.) peak hour entering and exiting trips for 500,000 gross square feet of building space within an industrial park for 10 percent H.B.W. transit ridership and no change in vehicle occupancy. SOLUTION: Refer to Trip Rate Table for ITE Land Use Code 130 (Figure 10). Check entering and exiting peak hour rates to equal total and adjust rates. Assume no H.B.W. transit ridership in trip rate data. 24 -Hour Trip Ends Calculation: Average Rate = 7.00 AWDVTE /T.G.S.F. Assume: 2.0 employees per T.G.S.F. 5 percent absentee factor 1.1 employees per vehicle 5 percent other modes SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use /Building Independent Type Shopping_ Center 400,000- 499,499GAS.F• ITE Land Use Code e Area 825 Variable —Trips 1,000 Gross Square Feet of Leasahl per Average Trip Rate Maximum Rate Minimum Rate . Correlation Coefficient Number of Studies Average Size of Independent Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 149.7 102 0 27 2 1 r 4111 Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic A.M. Between 7 and 9 Enter 0 R 1 1473 Exit 0.2 1 473 Total 0.5 1 473 P.M. Between 4and6 Enter 1 q 1 473 Exit 1.9 1 4 Total 4-9 7.2 L_R 4 4S 4 Peak Hour of Generator A.M. Enter 2.0 1 454 Exit 1 G 1 Total 3 7 2 2 5 5 2 2 R 1 __454 44.6 4 P.M. Enter Exit 9 1 1 4 73 Total 4, 7 2 —3 9 R 4111 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 61.1!_ 4 —_I2 0 6 449 1 173 4 73 Peak Hour of Generator Enter 2 4 l 1 Exit 2 8 Total c 4 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends 10 2 1 4-73 Peak Hour of Generator Enter 0 6 1 1 173 Exit 0 8 1 1 73 Total '-.4 2, 11 73 Source Numbers i • . ITE Technical Date 1 975, Committee 6A -6 —Trip Generation Rates 979, Rev 1982 G.S.F. = Gross Square Feet of Leasable Area Caution, limited sample size, use carefully. SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Independent Type Shopping Center 500,000 - 999,999 r,_s_a ITE Land Use Code Area 826 Variable —Trips per 1 0nn Gross Square Feet of Leasable Average Trip Rate Maximum Rate Minimum Rate Correlation Coefficient Number of Studies Average Size of Independent VariablelStudy Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 37.2 54 8 17.9 37 617 Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic A.M. Between 7 and 9 Enter 0.38 0.64 0.22 6 751 Exit 0 23 n 44 0 07 6 751 Total 0 61 1 08 n 3n 6 751 P.M. Between 4 and 6 Enter 1 59 1 65 1 9Q 2 16 1 18 1 1 3 7 1 n 757 7 �7 Exit Total 3 1 2 3 qF 2 31 10 72'2 Peak Hour of Generator A.M. Enter 1 40 1 86 1 11 7 757 Exit 1 35 1 95 0 82 12 710 Total 2 5 3 2L 6 7 751 757 P.M. Enter 1 68 2 06 _1--95 1 36 Exit 1 81 2 41 1 1 8 12 1 1 n Total Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 1 15 3 70.4 23.6 18 710 Peak Hour of Generator Enter - 2. 30 2 35 3.66 3- 22 1.04 ' 1 26 7 1 757 710 Exit Total _ . :: Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends 19.5 38.4 4.1 18 Peak Hour of Generator Enter 0.81 1.81 0.20 7 710 757 Exit 1.22 2.61 0.19 12 710 Total Source Numbers 65. 72. 1. 3, 5, 6 13 14. 18 22. 26. 49 54, 59. 60 61, 64, 73. 77. 79 99. 100, 110, 124 ITE Technical Committee 6A -6 —Trip Generation Rates Date: 1975, 1979 Rev. 1982 G.S.F. = Gross Square Feet of Leasable Area 1 1 SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE fl Ic > PLANNING DEPARTMENT a A� - " t C BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFE ON STREET PHONE 456- SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 22D6 DEC 2 7 1989 MINUTES OF FINAL PLATTING CONFERENCE (SUBDIVISIONS) DECEMBER 19, 1988 SULLIVAN PARK SHOPPING CENTER The regular meeting of the Final Platting Conference (Subdivisions) was held on Monday, December 19, 1988 at 1:00 p.m to consider the proposed Sullivan Park Shopping Center. Present were the sponsor, Raymond Hanson; Donald Johns, R. A. Hanson Company; Drew Bodker, attorney for R. A. Hanson Company; Wallis D. Hubbard, County Planning Director, Doug Adams, County Subdivisions Administrator, Gary Kennaly and Gary Nelson, County Engineer's Office; Daryl Way, County Health District; Bill Dobratz, County Utilities Department Director; and Dick Simpson and Mike Phillips, Simpson Engineers. The sponsor outlined the proposal, indicating a targeted deadline for final plat approval is July 28, 1989. Problems were addressed relating to sewer, water, a freeway interchange and a Burlington Northern right -of -way. Electricity and gas service must also be available when the shopping center is constructed; however, these do not present a problem A 6 -inch pipe, insulated and approved, is in place across Sullivan to pump sewage. This needs to be extended, and two pumping stations will be added. The Evergreen freeway interchange is to be conceptually approved prior to the July 28 deadline. Discussion was had regarding problems with the placement elevation, lack of federal one -mile distance requirement (the proposed interchange is 9/10 of a mile distant) and the encroachment of two residences on the proposed interchange area. The Burlington Northern right -of -way has been abandoned; there are reversion rights which will require Burlington Northern to provide right -of -way to R. A. Hanson Company. Engineering Department Comments: Construction of the freeway interchange, rather than just conceptual approval, is required upon development of anything over 650,000 square feet. Since the shopping center could conceivably use the entire 650,000 square feet, the result would be that any peripheral property development would trigger the roadway improvements. It is the staffs position that connection onto Mission south of Evergreen is the development's obligation. sdy uttwz COUNTY ENGINEER MINUTES OF DECEMBER 19, 1988 PLATTING CONFERENCE PAGE 2 Heal�partment Comments: The sponsor need only add certain restrictive language, which is contained in the Findings and Order, to the current proposal to satisfy Health Department requirements. Planning Department Comments: As a land use process, this proposal is a good one. The freeway interchange and clear plat boundaries must be established before the final platting process can proceed. The Planning Department recommended that, when the boundaries are clear, a final plat be approved, with express limitations and conditions to tie specific construction proposals back into the platting process. The Planning Department recognized that the phased improvements to Sullivan Park Center would mean the plat dedication would stipulate a specified and limited developable floor area, which would trigger additional roadway improvements. If many lots are platted, it is likely that some lots will not be able to obtain building permits until Phase 2 or 3 roadway construction has been completed or bonded. Specific language for the dedication will be provided to the plat sponsor once the land and lots to be finalized are indicated. The Planning Department will require the landscaping of the site to be filed be bonded or installed prior to finalization. Additionally, the riparian park will have to be improved and provided for as stated in the conditions of approval prior to the filing of any portion of the Center. Action: The sponsor will meet with the Washington State Department of Transportation and the County Engineer's Office to satisfy requirements so the platting process can proceed. The meeting adjourned at 2:14 p.m. fcu SPOMANC COUNTY COUNT NOUSE $ awm Co mvirr PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEQFERSbN S :tREET Yt tlD UU �, 5t PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 9926 MINUTES OF FINAL PLATTING CONFERENCE (SUBDIVISIONS) DECEMBER 19, 1988 SULLIVAN PARK SHOPPING CENTER DEC 2 7 1988 SPOKANE COUNTY F.';; INFER i The regular meeting of the Final Platting Conference (Subdivisions) was held on Monday, December 19, 1988 at 1:00 p.m. to consider the proposed Sullivan Park Shopping Center. Present were the sponsor, Raymond Hanson; Donald Johns, R. A. Hanson Company; Drew Bodker, attorney for R. A. Hanson Company; Wallis D. Hubbanl, County Planning Director, Doug Adams, County Subdivisions Administrator, Gary Kennaly and Gary Nelson, County Engineer's Office; Daryl Way, County Health District; Bill Dobratz, County Utilities Department Director, and Dick Simpson and Mike Phillips, Simpson Engineers. Outline of Pmoosed Subdivision Provisions: The sponsor outlined the proposal, indicating a targeted deadline for final plat approval is July 28, 1989. Problems were addressed relating to sewer, water, a freeway interchange and a Burlington Northern right -of -way. Electricity and gas service must also be available when the shopping center is constructed; however, these do not present a problem A 6 -inch pipe, insulated and approved, is in place across Sullivan to pump sewage. This needs to be extended, and two pumping stations will be added. The Evergreen freeway interchange is to be conceptually approved prior to the July 28 deadline. Discussion was had regarding problems with the placement: elevation, lack of federal one -mile distance requirement (the proposed interchange is 9/10 of a mile distant) and the encroachment of two residences on the proposed interchange area. The Burlington Northern right -of -way has been abandoned; there are reversion rights which will require Burlington Northern to provide right -of -way to R. A. Hanson Company. i Leering Depamnent Comments: Construction of the freeway interchange, rather than just conceptual approval, is required upon development of anything over 650,000 square feet. Since the shopping center could conceivably use the entire 650,000 square feet, the result would be that any peripheral property development would trigger the roadway improvements It is the staffs position that connection onto Mission south of Evergreen is the development's obligation. MINUTES OF DECEMBER 19, 1988 PLATTING CONFERENCE PAGE 2 Health Department Comments: The sponsor need only add certain restrictive language, which is contained in the Findings and Order, to the current proposal to satisfy Health Department requirements. Action: The sponsor will meet with the Washington State Department of Transportation and the County Engineer's Office to satisfy requirements so the platting process can proceed. As a land use process, this proposal is a good one. The freeway interchange and clear plat boundaries must be established before the final platting process can proceed. The Planning Department recommended that, when the boundaries are clear, a final plat be approved, with express limitations and conditions to tie specific construction proposals back into the platting process. The Planning Department recognized that the phased improvements to Sullivan Park Center would mean the plat dedication would stipulate a specified and limited developable floor area, which would trigger additional roadway improvements. If many lots are platted, it is likely that some lots will not be able to obtain building permits until Phase 2 or 3 roadway construction has been completed or bonded. Specific language for the dedication will be provided to the plat sponsor once the land and lots to be finalized are indicated. The Planning Department will require the landscaping of the site to be filed be bonded or installed prior to finalization. Additionally, the riparian park will have to be improved and provided for as stated in the conditions of approval prior to the filing of any portion of the Center. The meeting adjourned at 2:14 p.m. fcu Plannine Department Comments: � Washington State -,/ Department of Transportation District 6 North 2714 Mayfair Street PO. Box 5299 North Central Station Spokane, Washington 99205.0299 (509) 456 -3000 Mr. Donald E. Johns R. A. Hanson Company, Inc. P.O. Box 7400 Spokane, WA 99207 Dear Mr. Johns: At our recent meeting, Mr. Hanson requested information as to the process required to obtain Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) approval for construction of a new interchange on Interstate 90 in the vicinity of Evergreen Road in the Spokane Valley. Attached is a copy of a letter from the FHWA to the Department of Transportation that lists the information required for requesting additional access to interstate highways. It is essential that the process includes open communication and commitment between the FHWA, Spokane County, and the Department. A report should be submitted through the Department to the FHWA that includes the information listed on the attachment. It would be helpful to have a joint meeting with Spokane County and the Department for resolution of possible conflicts prior to the submittal. It is doubtful that any approval for new access can be accomplished prior to completion of the final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the I -90 project. Our current plans are to complete the final EIS in early 1989 with approval by mid 1989. We look forward to continued cooperation in the development of this project. Please don't hesitate to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, RQA:np Attachment December.12, 1988 RE: I -90, Evergreen Interchange cc: Mike Brower, FHWA t/Ron Hormann, Spokane County Engineer Duane Berentson Secretary of Transportation RONALD Q. ANDERSON, P. E. Project Development Engineer ! DEC 1 2 1988 :r • • US Deportment of Ttansparionat Federal Highway Administration Mr. Duane Berentson Secretary of Transportation Departrent of Transportation Olympia, Washington Attention: Mr. C. L. Sleamer Dear Mr. Berentson: Wasmngton Division Additional Access Requests - Analysis and Documentation Recuirements The Federal Highway Mministrau ; tr tion (FICA) is receiving more and more requests for new or revised access to Interstate highways. Many of these requests are initiated by private development interests. These new access points are .becoming a catalyst for new development or redevelopment. The private interests are often supported by local gover nnents seeking an enhanced tax base. FHWA does not oppose such proposals if they are properly developed. In reviewing any proposal for new or revised access, however, FEWA must assure itself that there is either no impact or only minimal adverse impact on the safety and operation of the Interstate farility itself and that adequate steps are being taken to assure such conditions. Further, FEWA must assure that the proper design criteria are used in accordance with 23 CFR 625. Many of the access requests today involve significant modifications to existing interchanges or additional ranms, espe-'ially in urban areas, involving already closely spaced access and heavy volumes. Either case usually involves complex traffic operations. These modifications or new ac-ass points thus have the potential to significantly affect the level of service on the Interstate_ System. Some of the submissions to our Washington Office show that the traffic analysis often is not receiving adequate review. Bottanline statements regarding extent of intact on the Interstate facility are sometimes taken at face value without independent analysis. It is critically important that these types of access requests be subject to a detailed engineering review. Further, the capacity analysis should be in accordance with the latest revisions to the 1985 Highway flrncity Manual (RCM). The software available for the ICQ will greatly assist in this effort. Any access request suh to the Washington Office will be reviewed using the procedures contained in the 1985 BC1. (more) Suite 501 Evergreen Plaza 711 Sawn Capitol Way Olympia. Wasnington 98501 July 30, 1987 BEAD ode - 2 - It is believed that local jurisdictions may be making conmit tents before the States or FBWA have had an opportunity to review and take action. Requests for access are very often looked at in isolation; i.e., a single ramp to serve a particular purpose (property interest), rather than the highway network..as a whole with its existing access and operations .problems. Often only the lowest cost alternative is considered even though other alternatives exist which would provide not only the desired access but also improve traffic operations on the Interstate facility in question. This has especially been noted when a developer or the local community offers to pay for, the construction. Because the access issue is becoming more complex, especially in urban areas, both the FEWA and the State highway agency must try to get intd the process as early as possible, even if no Federal or State funds are involved. Revised or new access points should not be looked at as isolated actions.. We need to cooperate at all levels to develop proposals that not only provide the desired new or improved access, but also adequately address the safety and operation of the Interstate facility. The information contained in a State's request for new access must be sufficiently detailed to allow the FBWA to independently evaluate the impact of a change in or additional access on the Interstate System. More complex access requests will require a detailed proposal, including 'preliminary layouts, to support the request. In the past, guidance on the subject of additional access points was :found in the Interstate Cost Estimate (ICE) Manna14. Documentation for justification of additional ramps or interchanges had to demonstrate public benefits or need to use Interstate Construction (IC) funds. With the passage of the 1981 Federal-aid Highway Act, however, most requests -:for additional access points no longer involve a question of funding. Although the ICE Manuals still contain good guidance, there is a need to update the guidanrc in light of public /private investment, and the often competing benefits /impacts associated with adding new access points to the Interstate System. In order to clarify our policy concerning additional access to the Interstate System, we are enclosing a list of items that should be covered in a justification for new access. Local highway agencies, consultants and developers, as appropriate, should also be made aware of these requirements. Please contact this office if you have any questions concerning this matter. - Enclosure Sincerely yours, PAUL C. GREGSON Division Ey: L. P. Renz District "A" Engineer - 3 - Attachment Justification for Additional Access Points The following information should be provided to support a request for the approval of new or revised points of access on completed sections of the Interstate System. The guidance is not intended to specify any particular format but only the content for the request. New access points in isolated rural areas may not require the same level of detail. 1. Purpose. 2.' Relationship to other highway improvement plans and programs. 3. Distances to and size of communities or activities directly served. 4. Description of existing and proposed access. a. Configuration of the existing and proposed interchange. b. Distances to adjacent interchanges. c. Alternatives that have been considered. d. Description of any substandard features. e. Interstate main line and crossroad traffic volumes (ADT) including turning movements, for current year, implementation year, and design year. f. Number of main line and crossroad lanes; including any auxiliary lanes or C -D roads. 5. Traffic and operational analysis for existing and proposed conditions; including crossroads and other roads and streets to the extent necessary to assure the ability of them to effectively collect and distribute traffic from the new access. 6. Any other information that might help explain and /or support the proposal, e.g., cost- effectiveness analysis, source of funding, implementation schedule, etc. ` . RECEIVED ■ ® JAN 3 1 1995 17-71 Washington State Eastern Region Department of Transportatiol?OKANE COUNTY ENGINEE®714 N. Mayfair Street Sid Morrison Spokane, WA 99207 -2090 Secretary of Transportation (509) 324 -6000 Mr. John Todd Spokane County Planning W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 Dear Mr. Todd; January 20, 1995 Re: PE- 1504 -85 (Sullivan Park Center) Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the above extension of time request. As we have expressed in previous correspondence to the County, WSDOT is extremely concerned about the rapid growth in traffic in the Spokane Valley, and in .particular, the traffic growth along the Pines Road corridor. Our concern is further exemplified by historic traffic counts in this area, as traffic has increased approximately 50% at the Pines Avenue south ramp terminals between 1985 and 1992. This traffic growth has resulted in Level of Service (LOS) "F" at these ramp terminals and a poor LOS at other intersections in this area. This poor LOS is also documented in the spill over of traffic on the eastbound off -ramp, which at times backs down the ramp to mainline I -90. This backup is a serious safety concern due to the stopped vehicles on mainline I -90. Along with the poor LOS, air quality as it relates to vehicular emissions may be another area of concern that has not been addressed. Considering this information, we request that Spokane County Planning place the following conditions on the above project: 1. The Intersection Plan for Approval that is currently being prepared by the applicant for the intersection of Pines Road and Indiana Avenue needs to be approved by both Spokane County and WSDOT. A developers agreement needs to be signed prior to any construction commencing on this intersection. 2. The applicant shall demonstrate "Air Quality Conformity" at the Pines/Indiana intersection. An air quality conformity analysis will need to be prepared and approved by Spokane Regional Transportation Council, prior to the construction of the Indiana Avenue improvements. •J Mr. Todd January 20, 1995 Page 2 3. Prior to the construction of Phase II of the Sullivan Park Center (in excess of the 650,000 gross square footage) construction of the Evergreen Interchange must occur. 4. The maximum gross square footage allowed in Phase I (650,000 square feet) without the Evergreen Interchange shall not be increased without the appropriate NEPA/SEPA environmental documentation being prepared. This process needs to take into account the environmental documentation that has been prepared for the Evergreen Interchange. 5. Due to the operational difficulties currently being experienced on Pines Road and the inability of our facility to accommodate additional traffic volumes, WSDOT reserves the right to limit or prohibit turning movements along Pines Road at the ramp terminals and at Indiana Avenue. Additionally adequate green time may not be available to Indiana at the Pines Road/Indiana Avenue traffic signal to provide this site adequate access. WSDOT is currently investigating with Spokane County the possibility of re- aligning Indiana Avenue to the north to line up with Mansfield Avenue, to provide greater spacing to improve intersection operations. We consider it important to point out the above issues to insure that the probable traffic circulation impacts this project would have are fully considered. Again we would request that the above items be place as conditions of approval on this proposed project. If you should have any questions please feel free to contact me at 324 -6125 or Leonard Cash in our Planning Office at 324 -6199. JCL GDJ /gf cc: R.A. Hanson, RAHCO - Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers Sincerely, G ' J OUSEK Assistant Rigional Administrator for Development OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TO: CHAD COLES FROM: DAVE BERTO DATE: May 21, 1997 SUBJECT: BOND ITEMS B95134 Indiana Ave ( BSP 48 P1504) The bond for the above mentioned project is for the following items: 1) All the items on the approved road and drainage plans. 2) Original bond of $1,906,470.00 was issued for construction of Indiana Ave for P1504 Sullivan Park Center and is in that file. 3) New bond amount of $1,937,320.00 was calculated for BSP 48 and B95134. The calculations are in the BSP 48 file . 4) The bond has been reduced to $1,374,189.00 on Dec 4,1996 for work accepted. 5) To date only $475,706.67 of the allowable $532,281.00 has been released by Dean Franz (see memos Oct 29, Dec 4 (two on Dec) 1996 and Feb 12,1997. Construction Surety Summary Project: Indiana Avenue Road Improvements (B95134) From Pines to 300 Ft. East of Sullivan Rd. Ink Dean Franz, Spokane County Computed Assignment & Reductions Actual Construction Cost = $ 1,937,320.00 per revised plans done in Fall of 1996 First Assignment Reduction on 12/4/96 Amt to Remain in Acct. = $ 1,374,189.00 Allowable Reduction: Bond Assignment = $ 1,908,470.00 Less Min. Amt. to Remain in Acct. = $ (1,374,189.00) Allowable Reduction, as of 12/4/96 = $ 532,281.00 Second Bond Reduction on 5/22/97 Amt to Remain in Acct. = $ 895,494.40 Allowable Reduction: Amt. Left in Acct. (As of 2/27/97) = $ 1,430,763.33 Less Min. Amt. to Remain in Acct. = $ (895,494.40) Allowable Reduction, as of 5/22/97 = $ 535,268.93 Actual Assignment & Reductions Total Bond Assignment, $ 1,906,470.00 per Acct. 98925140, dated May 9, 1990 Actual Assignment Reductions Request #1, approved on 12/4/96 = $ 413,777.96 (three documents) Request #2, approved on 2/27/97 = $ 61,928.71 (one document) Reductions Total, as of 2/27/97 = $ 475,706.67 Amt Left in Account (As of 2/27/97) = $ 1,430,763.33 Actual Assignment Reductions Request #3, approved on 5/22/97 = $ 161,355.78 (one document) Request #4, approved on 6/03/97 = $ 41,005.97 Request #5, approved 6 /05%97 = $ 120,631.19 (four documents) Amt Left in Account (As of 6/05/97) = $ 1,107,770.39 Filename: 895134, Bond Summary Printout Date: 6/9/97 To: S AMER, p C Simpson Engineers North 909 Argonne Road Spokane, Washington Attn: Mike Phillips ® This property covered by our pending commitment has not been reexamined and this Supplemental Report DOES NOTextend the effective date of the Commitment, or any Supplemental reports to the commitment. There have been no changes in the title to the property covered by our Preliminary Commitment since our last report except as follows: Deed recorded under Auditor's No. Deed of trust recorded under Auditor's No. p recorded under Auditors No. XX TITLEIS NOW VESTEDIN R.A. Hanson Company, who also appears of record as R.A. Hanson and Company Paragraph (s) 2 0 of our Preliminary Commitment ( is / ) now deleletd. O All matters relating to ALTA extended coverage have been cleared. 1. First Half of general taxes for 1990 are paid in full. Pleas See Attached. Dated April 12, 1990 at 8:00 A.M. F.A.T. 104 - B SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT NO. 'Proud to be First' Our Order No. 68418 — MSA Your Reference Proposed Plats of Sullivan Park Center Loan No. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF SPOKANE WEST 704 FIRST AVE. SPOKANE, WASHINGTON BY :ic Ef••,/oiv nSO -r..) �I -13 9 I:--First Half of general taxes are paid in full. Parcel No First Half of General taxes are paid in full. Parcel No First Half of General taxes are paid in full. Parcel No First Half of General taxes are paid in full. Parcel No 2. First Half of Irrigation are paid in full. Parcel First Half of Irrigation are paid in full. Parcel First Half of Irrigation are paid in full. Parcel for 1990 in the amount of $4,285.28 . 45132.9040 for 1990 in the amount of $7,942.50 . 45113.9026 "for 1990 in the amount of $7,770.88 . 45114.9031 for 1990 in the amount of $1,371.27 . 45141.9170 assessments for 1990 in the amount 66 $639.18 No. 45113.9026 assessments for 1990 in the amount of $560.95 No. 45114.9031 assessments for 1990 in the amount of $149.31 No. 45141.9170. a WI Washington State Department of Transportation District 6 North 2714 Mayfair Street P.O. Box 5299 North Central Station Spokane, Washington 99205 -0299 (509) 456 -3000 Ron Hormann Spokane County Engineers North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Mr. Hormann: JRB:db JFP April 20, 1990 Re: SR 90, Sullivan Road Interchange Modification Please be advised that the District has reviewed and approved the Quitclaim Deed for conveyance to the Department. The deeds have been forwarded to Headquarters for signature. Very truly yours, Duane Berentson Secretary of Transportation JAMES R. BUSS, P.E. District Administrator By: JOHN F. PIERSON District R/W Supervisor RECEIVED APP 2 0 1990 EB- Ne -110- DEVELOPER AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this 6th day of April, 1990, by and between R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer" and SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at W. 1116 Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as the "County ", jointly referred to as the "Parties ", W I T N E S S E T B : WHEREAS, Developer received preliminary plat approval from the County for Sullivan Park Center, PE- 1504 -85, ZE- 180 -78, on March 25, 1986, and WHEREAS, Developer wishes to obtain approval of Final Plat from the County, and WHEREAS, the County has required, as a Condition of Approval of Final Plat, that Developer construct certain improvements in the form of roads, drainage swales, landscaping, sprinkler system, and lighting, all pursuant to that certain Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Planning Report dated October 25, 1985, and WHEREAS, it is required that Developer post a bond or provide other security for the construction of said improvements before the Final Plat will be approved, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the covenants made hereinafter and the mutual benefits to be derived by the Parties hereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. Upon execution of this Agreement, Developer shall grant a deed of trust to County of all the property contained within the proposed Final Plat. The grant of said deed of trust to County shall be made for the purposes of pledging said real estate to County as security for the full performance by Developer of the construction of those improvements required in the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Planning Report Conditions of Approval dated October 24, 1985. It is acknowledged and understood between the parties hereto that —1— Developer intends to sell approximately 82 acres of the property contained within the Final Plat to Price Development Company, a Utah corporation, within fifteen (15) days of the filing of the Final Plat. Developer is to receive a cash sum of money from Price Development Company as and for the purchase of said property. It is agreed between Developer and County that at such time that Developer receives cash proceeds from the sale to Price Development Company, then Developer may, at Developer's option, deposit $1,906,470.00 into a savings certificate and /or bank savings account as security for the cost of the construction of roads, drainage swales, landscaping, lighting and sprinkler system as required in the aforementioned Conditions of Approval. In the alternative, Developer may obtain a bond or letter of credit, either of which must be first approved by County, in such amounts as to adequately collateralize Developer's obligations for the aforementioned improvements. At such time as $1,906,470.00 is deposited as set forth above, or when Developer has obtained a bond or letter of credit acceptable to County, then County will reconvey and release its deed of trust in lieu thereof. 2. In the event that Developer chooses to use the cash sale proceeds as security, then Developer agrees to execute assignment agreements in a form acceptable to the County for the purpose of substituting the cash collateral for the aforementioned deed of trust. Similarly, any bond or letter of credit pledged by Developer, as security for the required improvements, must first be approved by County before County will be required to release its deed of trust. 3. County agrees that Developer shall be entitled to all interest earned on the escrowed funds, which interest shall be paid to Developer at Developer's discretion. County agrees that as the improvements are constructed, County may reduce the amount of the security held by County at the discretion of County. Any discretionary reductions in the amount of security shall be based upon the County Engineer's estimate of costs to complete the improvements required of Developer. 4. The initial amount of $1,906,470.00, which is to secure the performance of Developer, includes $206,470.00, which is the amount that the Spokane County Planning Department has required as security for the construction of landscaping and irrigation in the landscaped median in Indiana Avenue and the two parcels of land which will be deeded to the State of Washington for the Sullivan Road Interchange. The $206,470.00 has been computed by figuring the total square footage of the median in Indiana Avenue -2- (71,250 sq. ft.) at $1.75 per square foot, and the square footage in the property to be deeded to the State of Washington (81,780 sq. ft) at $1.00 per square foot. These computations do not make any allowance for turn -out lanes on Indiana Avenue. It is therefore agreed that the total security amount of $1,906,470.00 will be adjusted at such time that the final turn -out lane requirements are determined. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above - written, ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE, Clerk of the Board By Deputy Clerk - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OP SPOKANE COUNTY By By By Patricia Mummey - Chairman Steven Hasson John McBride DEVELOPER: B.A. HANSONCOOMPAN INC. B V ! . a . / " � AIN/ R.A. Hanson - President DEED OF TRUST RECE D APP 2 0 7990 q4„ This Deed of Trust made this 6th day of April, 1990, by and between GRANTOR, whose name and address is R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., P.O. Box 7400, Spokane, Washington 99207, a corporation; TRUSTEE, whose name and address is First American Title Insurance Company, W. 704 First Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99204; and SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Washington, BENEFICIARY, whose address is West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, Washington, to -wit: Grantor hereby bargains, sells and conveys to Trustee, in trust, with power of sale the following described real property in Spokane County, Washington: SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE. -1- The property which is the subject of this Deed of Trust is not used principally for agricultural or farming purposes. This deed is for the purpose of securing the obligation of the Grantor herein not to sell, convey or apply for building permits on any lot assigned herein until the Grantor constructs all roads, with landscaped medians, drainage structures and facilities, sidewalks, monuments, curbs, street lights, sprinkler system, and other facilities in accordance with the approved plans on file in the Spokane County Engineer's office. These plans are designed to meet Spokane County Standards adopted in Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, and Conditions of Approval in the Findings and Order for PE- 1504 -85 and zone change ZE- 180 -78. The Grantor agrees to complete all above - mentioned improvements by May 1, 1992. In the event these improvements are not completed by the above - mentioned date, the Grantor is considered to have defaulted on the Deed of Trust and Spokane County may at any time thereafter proceed as outlined hereafter. The Spokane County Engineer's estimate for these improvements is $1,906,470.00. It is further understood that this Deed of Trust is for the actual cost of improvements at the time they are made, which cost may exceed the Spokane County Engineer's estimate. To protect the security of this Deed of Trust, Grantor covenants and agrees: (1) To keep the property in good condition and repair; to permit no waste thereof; and to comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, covenants, conditions and restrictions affecting the property. (2) To pay before delinquent all lawful taxes and assessments against the property; to keep the property free and clear of all other charges, liens or encumbrances impairing the security of this Deed of Trust. (3) hereof or the rights or powers of Beneficiary or Trustee, and to pay all costs and expenses, including costs of title search and attorney's fees in a reasonable amount, in any such action or proceeding and in any suit brought by Beneficiary to foreclose this Deed of Trust. (4) To pay all costs, fees and expenses in connection with this Deed of Trust, including the expenses of Trustee, incurred in forcing the obligations secured hereby and the Trustee's and attorney's fees actually incurred as provided by statute. (5) To defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security Should the Grantor fail to pay when due any taxes, assessments, liens, encumbrances or other charges against the property hereinabove described, Beneficiary may pay the same, and the amounts so paid, with interest at a rate of 12 percent, shall be added to become a part of the debts secured by this Deed of Trust. It is mutually agreed that: A. RECONVEYANCES: (1) Conditions for Reconveyance. Grantor shall have the right to have any lot or lots within the subdivision reconveyed. The conditions precedent to said reconveyance are: (a) No notice of default remains uncured; (b) Grantor shall be entitled to said reconveyance on all or a portion of the lots within the subdivision upon: i. Construction by the Grantor of all roads within the final plat to the standards required of the Grantor by the Beneficiary in accordance with such final plat and acceptance of said construction by the Beneficiary; or/ ii. Construction by the Grantor of a portion of the roads within the final plat to the standards required of the Grantor by the Beneficiary in accordance with such final plat and acceptance of said construction by the Benefi- ciary; provided, however, the Beneficiary retains the exclusive authority to determine whether or not to accept any portion of the roads based in part upon the traffic flow within the approved plat; or iii. Submittal by the Grantor and acceptance by the Beneficiary of acceptable guarantees to construct all or a portion of the roads within the final plat to the standards submitted to the Grantor by the Beneficiary in accordance with such final plat. Such guarantees may include performance bonds, loan assignments or assignments of savings accounts; provided, however, a submittal to the Beneficiary of guarantees for less than all the roads in the plat must be accompanied by a written development proposal indicating those lots within the approved plat which will be sold as a result of a partial reconveyance. The development proposal must be approved in writing by the Beneficiary prior to the acceptance of the guarantee and partial reconveyance. (2) Grantor shall pay for ALL costs and fees in preparation of full or partial reconveyances. (a) Subordination to Third Party Vendees. Beneficiary agrees that in the event of foreclosure of Grantor's interest herein, Beneficiary shall reconvey to Vendees of the Grantor upon performance by said Vendees to Beneficiary as hereinbefore stated. (3)• Cooperation. Each of the parties hereto, forthwith, and on the request of the other, shall execute and deliver such documents and take such action as may be reasonably required in order to carry out the intent and purposes of this Deed of Trust. (4) Default. Upon default by the Grantor(s) in the performance of any agreement contained herein, all sums secured hereby shall immediately become due and payable at the option of Beneficiary. In such event and upon written request of the Beneficiary, the Trustee shall sell the trust property in accordance with the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washington, and public auction to the highest bidder. Any person except Trustee may bid at the Trustee's sale. The Trustee shall apply the proceeds of the same as follows: -3- () To the expense of sale, including reasonable Trustee's and attorney's fees; (b) To the obligations secured by this Deed of Trust; i (c) ..The surplus, if any, shall be distributed to the persons entitled thereto. (5) Trustee shall deliver to the Purchaser at the sale, its deed without warranty, which shall convey to the Purchaser the interest in the property which Grantor had, or had the power to convey, at the time of his execution of this Deed of Trust, and such as he may have acquired thereafter. The Trustee's deed shall recite the facts shown that sale was conducted in compliance with all the requirements of law and of this Deed of Trust, which recital shall be prima facie evidence such compliance and conclusive evidence thereof in favor of bona fide purchasers and encumbrances for value. (6) The power of sale conferred by this Deed of Trust and by the Deed of Trust Act in the State of Washington, is not an exclusive remedy; Beneficiary may cause this Deed of Trust to be foreclosed as a mortgage. (7) In the event of the death, incapacity or disability or resignation of Trustee, Beneficiary may appoint in writing a Successor Trustee, and upon the recording of such appointment in the mortgage records of the county in which this Deed of Trust is recorded, the Successor Trustee shall be vested with all powers of the original Trustee. The Trustee is not obligated to notify any party hereto of pending sale under any Deed of Trust or of any action or proceeding in which the Grantor, Trustee or Beneficiary shall be a party, unless such action or proceeding is brought by Trustee. (8) This Deed of Trust applies, inures to the benefit of, and is binding not only on the parties hereto, but their heirs, devisees, legatees, administrators, executives, successors and assigns. GRANTOR R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE CLERK OF THE BOARD By: D e p u t y - By: V . a • W ��' r- SPOKANE COUNTY By: R.A. Hanson - President Chairman, Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington APPROVED AS TO FORM: SPOKANE COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE By: ././ ; :iat r_ . STATE OF WASHINGTON County of Spokane On this day personally appeared before me known to me to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she /they signed the same as his /her /their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND and affixed my official seal this 19 . TRUSTEE: Received this day of , 19 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of Spokane ) On this / ' day of April, 1990, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared R.A. Hanson, to me known to be the President of R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said in- strument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. 03470 -5- Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane My commission expires: By: Title: day of Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the ay and first above written. 'fc,W M • 13001‘1k 1 '+A" ;r 9 NOTA ''''UBLIC :4a. " /,.° t My Appointment Expires: S —/7 -72 � L/fr' 9 mA'S ' ' "c„ft Itkep • EXHIBIT "A", That portion of Sections 11, 13 and 14, T. 25 N, R. 44 E.N.H. described as follows: Begin at the NW corner of said Section 131 thence 3 02 t along the West line of said Section 13, 60.72 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence S 69'57'29"E 81.37 feet to the Beginning of a nontangent curve concave to the with a radius of 40.00 feet and a radial bearing of 3 87'13'3794; W; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 71'06'35 ", an arc distance of 49.64 feet; thence S 73'52'58 "E 384.82 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 1442.00 feat; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 12'16'45 ", an arc distance of 309.04 feet; thence 3 28 23'47 "W radial to said curve 92.00 feet; thence 3 37'11'15 "W 126.03 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 633.00 feet and a radial bearing of N38'25'17 "E, said point being on the Northerly R/W of the E -NS ramp for Interstate 90 (I -90) at Sullivan Road; thence Westerly through a central angle of 41'10'58" an arc distance of 454.98 feet; thence S 87'14'19 "W, along said Northerly R/W 200.29 feet to the line between said Sections 13 i 14; thence Continuing S 87'14'19 "W along the Northerly R/W of the NS -W ramp for I -90 at Sullivan Road, 1048.61 feet to the Northerly R/W of said I -90; thence N 77'54'39 "W, along said Northerly line, 216.86 feet; thence N 7655'03'W, along said Northerly line, 1550.20 feet; thence N 74'10'4141,, along said Northerly line,,,620.00 feet/.thance N 56'26'27 "N 778.50 feet; thence N 0672$'18"N 950.00 feet to a point s on curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6684.56 feet and a radial bearing of 5 06'28'18 "E, said point being on the Southerly R/W of the Union Pacific; Railroad; thence Easterly, along said R/W, through a central angle of 11'17'05" an arc distance of 1316.56 feet; thence N 72'14'37 "E, along said R/W 551.72 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 964.95 feet and a radial bearing of 3 53'51'00 "W, said point being on the Southwesterly line of the State Parka Department Property as shown on .. Record of Survey filed in Survey book 41 page 84; the next 6 courses are along said Southwesterly line, thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 9'28'38 ", an arc distance of . 159.61 feet; thence 3 45'37'38 "E 912.03 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 2874.80 feet/ thence Southeasterly through s central angle of 11'48'30 ", an arc distance of 592.48 feet; thence 3 57'26'09 "E 588.09 feat ;thence S 32'33'52 "W 10.00 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave to the Northeast with radius of 5749.58 feet and a radial bearing of S 32'33'52 "W; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 5'59'36 ",an arc distance of 601.43 feet to the Westerly A/W of Sullivan Road; thence S 03'24'03 "E, along said Westerly R/W, 164.40 feet* thence S 02'46'23 "E, along said Westerly R/W, 37.28 feet; thence S 69 57'29 "E 59.67 feet to the True P.O.B. EXCEPT State Right of Way. Situete'in the County of Bpokans,,.stat* of Washington._ r. • S `S AME ti� � - _ C1 a oki1/4 . t 4 44 . 46s First American Title Insurance Company ne nunum n numuuamuuuumnumumnmuummmannumu uumuououuououuwmmmmmummmuu ommntuu umm ounnunmuunmuum uumumu m mum •� \�� Order No.: 67951 -BF Simpson Engineers North 909 Argonne Road Spokane, Washington A1TN: Mike Phillips First American Title Company of Spokane Hest 704 First Avenue • Spokane, lira. 99204 • (509) 456 -0550 • FAX (509) 747 -2761 This is a certificate as of March 29, 1990 at 8:00 A.M. for a plat of the following property: AS HERETO ATTACHED. This Company certifies that record title is vested in WHITWORTH FOUNDATION, A NON- PROFIT WASHINGTON CORPORATION, free from all liens, encumbrances and objections, except as follows: 1. GENERAL TAXES: Year: 1990 Amount: $15,885.00Tax Account No.: 45113.9026 Affects: This and other property GENERAL TAXES: PLAT CERTIFICATE REPORT Year: 1990 Amount: $2,308.81 Tax Account No.: 45104.9052 Affects: This and other property *CONTINUED* Proposed Plat of: Right of way for Indiana Avenue for Sullivan Park Center Order No.: 67951 -BF Page 2 2. IRRIGATION ASSESSMENT: For: 1990 By: Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19 Amount: $1,278.36 Tax Account No.: 45113.9026 Affects: This and other property NOTE: There will be a penalty assessed by the County Treasurer if the above Assessment becomes delinquent. IRRIGATION ASSESSMENT: For: 1990 By: Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19 Amount: $240.66 Tax Account No.: 45104.9052 Affects: This and other property NOTE: There will be a penalty assessed by the County Treasurer if the above Assessment becomes delinquent. 3. CONTRACT AND GRANT OF WATER PIPELINE RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT: Grantee: The United States of America Purpose: a perpetual right -of -way and easement to survey, construct, reconstruct, operate, inspect, maintain, and remove a water pipeline or conduit and appurtenances thereto, or any part thereof, through, over, and across, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto Recorded: June 22, 1965 Auditor's File No.: 118205C Volume /Page: Not Disclosed Affects: Entire Parcel 4. RELOCATION AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Between: The United States of America And: Consolidated Irrigation District and the R.A. Hanson and Company Recorded: December 13, 1989 Auditor's File No.: 8912130174 Regarding: the relocation of waterway facilities Affects: The South half of Section 11 *CONTINUED* Order No.: 67951 -BF Page 3 5. UNRECORDED CONTRACT, TERMS, PROVISIONS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS THEREOF: NOTES: Seller: Whitworth Foundation, a non - profit corporation Purchaser: R.A. Hanson and Company, Inc., a corporation Contract Dated: May 31, 1978 As Disclosed By: Notice of Real Estate Contract Recorded: June 15, 1978 Auditor's File No.: 7806150379 Excise Tax Receipt No.: 183836 6. Decree of Appropriation Filed February 5, 1986, in Spokane County Superior Court Cause Nos. 84202146 -7 and 84202145 -9 wherein the State of Washington appropriated portions of the Northeast quarter of Section 14, Government Lots 3 and 4 of the South half of the North half of Section 13, and the South half of Section 11 for Interstate 90. Said Decree states, in part, as follows: "TOGETHER WITH all rights of ingress and egress, if any (including all existing future or potential easements of access, light, view and air) to, from, and between said SR 90 and the remainder of Tract "X ". EXCEPT that there shall be reasonable ingress and egress to, from and between said Tract "X" and the Sullivan Road Line Survey of said SR 90 Northerly of HES 50 +92.16 Lt. and HES 50 +63.83 Rt. TOGETHER WITH the right to enter upon the respondents remaining lands, where necessary, to remove improvements, if any, located wholly or partially upon the right of way." 1. A fee will be charged upon the cancellation of this commitment pursuant to the Washington State Insurance Code and the filed rate schedule of the Company. 2. Inquiry should be made of the Spokane County Utilities Department at (509) 458 -2538 to ascertain if any user fees relating to the Aquifer Protection Area are payable at this time. Any such amounts may become liens upon the property at a later date. 3. Said premises lie within the boundaries of Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19 and are subject to future assessment by said District. *CONTINUED* Order No.: 67951 -BF Page 4 This Company further certifies that all taxes and assessments levied and chargeable have been fully paid except as noted above. BF /mca 235 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF SPOKANE (K.i, 4 Barbara J Farley� %� Order No.: 67951 -BF LEGAL DESCRIPTION A strip of land over a portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 11 and the Southeast quarter of Section 10, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., in Spokane County, Washington, the center line of which is described as follows: Begin at the Northeast corner of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M.; thence South 02 ° 46'23" East along the East line of said Section, 140.61 feet to the centerline of proposed Indiana Avenue; thence North 81 ° 15'36" West 692.40 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 955.00 feet; thence Northwesterly through a central angle of 57 ° 15'36" an arc distance of 954.40 feet; thence North 24 ° 00'00" West 220.00 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 955.00 feet; thence Northwesterly through a central angle of 29 ° 07'01 ", an arc distance of 485.32; thence North 53 ° 07'01" West 334.35 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 1500.00 feet; thence Northwesterly through a central angle of 50 ° 13'37 ", an arc distance of 1314.94 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6731.56 feet; thence Westerly through a central angle of 06 ° 52'20 ", an arc distance of 807.40 feet to the True Point of Beginning at which the right of way North of the centerline is 47.00 feet and South of the centerline is 37.00 feet, said point being the Westerly line of the proposed plat of Sullivan Park Center; thence continuing Westerly, along said curve, through a central angle of 2 ° 39'55 ", an arc distance of 313.14 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the Southeast with a radius of 1500.00 feet, at said point the right of way North of the centerline changes from 47.00 feet to 37.00 feet; thence Southwesterly through a central angle of 20 ° 09'40 ", an arc distance of 527.82 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 1500.00 feet; thence Southwesterly through a central angle of 21 ° 20'29 ", an arc distance of 558.72 feet to a point 47.00 feet North of the South line of the North half of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10, at said point the right of way South of the centerline changes from 37.00 feet to 47.00 feet; thence South 87 ° 22'26" West, parallel with said South line 2188.94 feet to the East line of Shannon Avenue (No. 280) and the end of said described centerline. The side line of said described right of way to be extended or shortened to meet said East line. 4� 5 rc AMEBI 1 stifr A3/41/47 ,s`� ® � First American Title Insurance Company �� /b nuunununu nnnmmmmmun u mummmnummnnmmmuumunmunmmmuuummuwnmuxmuun mmumuummuunmmummmmmmmmmmuummm mmm u m lllll t% Order No.: 68418 -MSA Simpson Engineers North 909 Argonne Road Spokane, Washington ATTN: Mike Phillips First American Title Company of Spokane West 704 First Avenue • Spokane. Wa. 99204 • (509) 456 -0550 • FAX (509) 747 -2761 RECi APR 31980 Proposed Plat of: Sullivan a rk PLAT CERTIFICATE REPORT This is a certificate as -of April 9, 1990 at 8:00 A.M., for a plat of the following property: EXHIBIT I ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. This Company certifies that record title is vested in R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, AS TO THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE FORMER RIGHT OF WAY OF THE COEUR D'ALENE AND SPOKANE RAILWAY COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY; AND WHITWORTH FOUNDATION, A NON- PROFIT WASHINGTON CORPORATION, AS TO THE REMAINDER, free from all liens, encumbrances and objections, except as follows: 1. GENERAL TAXES: Year: 1990 Amount: $8,570.57 Tax Account No.: 45132.9040 GENERAL TAXES: Year: 1990 Amount: $15,885.00 Tax Account No.: 45113.9026 GENERAL TAXES: Year: 1990 Amount: $15,541.77 Tax Account No.: 45114.9031 GENERAL TAXES: Year: 1990 Amount: $2,742.54 Tax Account No.: 45141.9170 *CONTINUED* Order No.: 68418 -MSA Page 2 2. IRRIGATION ASSESSMENT: For: 1990 By: Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19 Amount: $1,278.36 Affects: Tax Account No.: 45113.9026 IRRIGATION ASSESSMENT: For: 1990 By: Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19 Amount: $1,121.94 Affects: Tax Account No.: 45114.9031 IRRIGATION ASSESSMENT: For: 1990 By: Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19 Amount: $298.62 Affects: Tax Account No.: 45141.9170 NOTE: There will be a penalty assessed by the County Treasurer if the above Assessment becomes delinquent. 3. EASEMENT: Grantee: Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad Company, a corporation Purpose: the right, privilege and authority to maintain its transmission power line, consisting of a line of poles with necessary cross -arms, wire, and other appurtenances, as the same is now located, equipped and established Recorded: August 4, 1916 Auditor's File No.: 480258 Volume /Page: 344/371 Affects: the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter and Government Lot 10 of Section 14 4. TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT: Grantee: The United States of America Purpose: the right to enter and erect, operate, maintain, repair, rebuild, and patrol one or more electric power transmission lines and appurtenant signal lines, poles, towers, wires, cables, and appliances necessary in connection therewith Recorded: November 12, 1941 Auditor's File No.: 847007A Volume /Page: 575/462 *CONTINUED* Order No.: 68418 -MSA Page 3 5. EASEMENT: Grantee: Spokane County Purpose: for use as a public highway Recorded: October 29, 1948 Auditor's File No.: 859802A Volume /Page: 578/370 Affects: The East 30 feet of the Northeast quarter of Section 14 and the East 30 feet of Section 11 6. TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT: Grantee: United States of America Purpose: perpetual easement and.right to enter and erect, maintain, repair, rebuild, operate and patrol one line of electric power transmission structures and appurtenant signal lines Recorded: June 8, 1959 Auditor's File No.: 629711B Volume /Page: Not Disclosed Affects: Government Lots 6, 11 in Section 11 and the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 14. 7. PIPE LINE EASEMENT: Grantee: The Washington Water Power Company, a corporation Purpose: installing, maintaining, repairing and removing a gas transmission pipe line and appurtenances thereto, together with the right to inspect said line, prohibit dwellings within fifteen feet of the centerline thereof, and to remove brush and trees that may interfere with the construction, maintenance and operation of the same Recorded: January 8, 1962 Auditor's File No.: 831986B Volume /Page: Not Disclosed Affects: That portion of Sections Eleven ( 11) and Fourteen (14) lying Southerly of the Southerly right of way line of Spokane, Coeur d'Alene and Palouse Railroad (Great Northern) and Northerly of Primary State Highway No. 2, as now located. 8. CONTRACT AND GRANT OF WATER PIPELINE RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT: Grantee: The United States of America Purpose: a perpetual right -of -way and easement to survey, construct, reconstruct, operate, inspect, maintain, and remove a water pipeline or conduit and appurtenances thereto, or any part thereof, through, over, and across, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto Recorded: June 22, 1965 Auditor's File No.: 118205C Volume /Page: Not Disclosed Affects: Entire Parcel *CONTINUED* Order No.: 68418 -MSA Page 4 9. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT: Grantee: Inland Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation Purpose: The right, privilege and authority, to install, re- install, construct, erect, alter, repair, energize, operate and maintain electric underground transmission and distribution facilities, consisting of vaults, manholes, handholes, ducts, conduits, cables, wires and other necessary or convenient appurtenances; ALSO right, privilege, and authority to install, reinstall, construct, erect, alter, repair, energize, operate and maintain at ground level, electric transformer units, electric junction cabinets and /or containers, together with appurtenances necessary or convenient to make said underground and surface installations an integrated electric system and in connection with all the foregoing to cut, trim, or chemically treat trees and shrubbery, to chip and spread branches and other foliage and to pile and stack logs as necessary alongside the cleared right of way in accordance with REA specifications, to the extent necessary to install and maintain said electric system Recorded: July 28, 1972 Auditor's File No.: 640587C Volume /Page: Not Disclosed Affects: The South half of Section 11 and the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 14 10. PIPE LINE EASEMENT: Grantee: The Washington Water Power Company, a Corporation Purpose: installing, maintaining, repairing and removing a natural gas pipe line and appurtenances thereto, together with the right to inspect said line, prohibit dwellings within said 20 -foot strip and remove brush and trees that may interfere with the construction, maintenance and operation of the same. Recorded: May 10, 1985 Auditor's File No.: 8505100167 Volume /Page: 750/1471 Affects: The Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter and the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 14 *CONTINUED* Order No.: 68418 -MSA Page 5 11. RELOCATION AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Between: The United States of America And: Consolidated Irrigation District and the R.A. Hanson and Company Recorded: December 13, 1989 Auditor's File No.: 8912130174 Regarding: the relocation of waterway facilities Affects: The South half of Section 11 12. UNRECORDED CONTRACT, TERMS, PROVISIONS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS THEREOF: Seller: Whitworth Foundation, a non - profit corporation Purchaser: R.A. Hanson and Company, Inc., a corporation Contract Dated: May 31, 1978 As Disclosed By: Notice of Real Estate Contract Recorded: June 15, 1978 Auditor's File No.: 7806150379 Excise Tax Receipt No.: 183836 13. Decree of Appropriation Filed February 5, 1986, in Spokane County Superior Court Cause Nos. 84202146 -7 and 84202145 -9 wherein the State of Washington appropriated portions of the Northeast quarter of Section 14, Government Lots 3 and 4 of the South half of the North half of Section 13, and the South half of Section 11 for Interstate 90. Said Decree states, in part, as follows: "TOGETHER WITH all rights of ingress and egress, if any (including all existing future or potential easements of access, light, view and air) to, from, and between said SR 90 and the remainder of Tract "X ". EXCEPT that there shall be reasonable ingress and egress to, from and between said Tract "X" and the Sullivan Road Line Survey of said SR 90 Northerly of HES 50 +92.16 Lt. and HES 50 +63.83 Rt. TOGETHER WITH the right to enter upon the respondents remaining lands, where necessary, to remove improvements, if any, located wholly or partially upon the right of way." 14. EASEMENT: Grantee: Pacific States Telephone and successors and assigns Purpose: To erect and maintain poles, and fixtures thereon, and to Recorded: October 7, 1905 Auditor's File No.: 129028 Affects: Section 11 *CONTINUED* Telegraph Company, its with the necessary wires keep same free from foliage Order No.: 68418 -MSA Page 6 15. EASEMENT: Grantee: The Washington Water Power Company, a Washington corporation Purpose: To erect, construct, reconstruct and maintain an electrical distribution line and appurtenances Recorded: December 27, 1940 Auditor's File No.: 472499A Volume /Page: 491/300 Affects: Section 13 and other property 16. EASEMENT: Grantee: Spokane County Purpose: An easement for highway purposes Recorded: June 12, 1951 Auditor's File No.: 37017B Volume /Page: 612/622 Affects: Section 13 17. Relinquishment of rights of access to State Highway, and of light, view and air, under the terms of Deed to the State of Washington, recorded September 27, 1955, under Auditor's File No. 344727B. 18. Relinquishment of rights of access to State Highway, and of light, view and air, under the terms of Deed to the State of Washington, recorded June 14, 1957,. under Auditor's File No. 466133B. 19. EASEMENT: Grantee: State of Washington Purpose: Improve and widen Sullivan Road Recorded: September 16, 1985 Auditor's File No.: 8509160243 Volume /Page: 773/610 *CONTINUED* Order No.: 68418 -MSA Page 7 20. Right of Entry granted to Spokane Industrial Park, Inc., and Washington Water Power Company for permit of ingress and egress and permission to connect into the manhole located on Sullivan Road, until date of completion of construction of sewer distribution line, dated August 7, 1985 and recorded under Auditor's File No. 8509190152. This Company further certifies that all taxes and assessments levied and chargeable have been fully paid except as noted above. MSA /mca 239 No Charge FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF SPOKANE Mark S. A'pinwall Order No.: 68418-NSA LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of SECTIONS 11, 13 AND 14, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST, W.M., in Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Begin at the Northwest corner of said Section 13; thence South 02 ° 46'23" East, along the West line of said Section 13, 60.72 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 69 ° 57'29" East 81.37 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 40.00 feet and a radial bearing of South 87 ° 13'37" West; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 71 ° 06'35 ", an arc distance of 49.64 feet; thence South 73 ° 52'58" East 384.82 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 1442.00 feet; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 12 ° 16'45 ", an arc distance of 309.04 feet; thence South 28 ° 23'47" West radial to said curve 92.00 feet; thence South 37 ° 11'15" West 126.03 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 633.00 feet and a radial bearing of North 38 ° 25'17" East, said point being on the Northerly R/W of the E -NS ramp for Interstate 90 (I -90) at Sullivan Road; thence Westerly through a central angle of 41 ° 10'58" an arc distance of 454.98 feet; thence South 87 ° 14'19" West, along said Northerly R/W 200.29 feet to the line between said Sections 13 and 14; thence continuing South 87 ° 14'19" West along the Northerly R/W of the NS -W ramp for I -90 at Sullivan Road, 1048.61 feet to the Northerly R/W of said I -90; thence North 77 ° 54'39" West, along said Northerly line, 216.86 feet; thence North 76 ° 55'02" West, along said Northerly line, 1550.20 feet; thence North 76 ° 10'41" West, along said Northerly line, 620.00 feet; thence North 56 ° 26'27" West 778.50 feet; thence North 06 ° 28'18" West 950.00 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6684.56 feet and a radial bearing of South 06 ° 28'18" East, said point being on the Southerly R/W of the Union Pacific Railroad; thence Easterly, along said R /W, through a central angle of I1 ° 17'05" an arc distance of 1316.56 feet; thence North 72 ° 14'37" East, along said R/W 551.72 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 964.95 feet and a radial bearing of South 53 ° 51'00" West, said point being on the Southwesterly line of the State Parks Department Property as shown on Record of Survey filed in Survey Book 41 Page 84; the next 6 courses are along said Southwesterly line; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 9 ° 28'38 ", an are distance of 159.61 feet; thence South 45 ° 37'38" East 912.03 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 2874.80 feet; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 11 ° 48'30 ", an arc distance of 592.48 feet; thence South 57 ° 26'08" East 588.09 feet; thence South 32 ° 33'52" West 10.00 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave to the Northeast with radius of 5749.58 feet and a radial bearing of South 32 ° 33'52" West; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 5 ° 59'36 ", an arc distance of 601.43 feet to the Westerly R/W of Sullivan Road; thence South 03`24'03" East, along said Westerly R /W, 164.40 feet; thence South 02 ° 46'23" East, along said Westerly R /W, 37.28 feet; thence South 69 ° 57'29" East 59.67 feet to the True Point of Beginning. EXCEPT State Right of Way. EXHIBIT I \ \1 r n 7 IC 4 5 0.e. C- • .0 H 0 7�•a, y, / - 3 / T� . o rs < /rCNf % �• "-� i� � /. J I II / D r ' 0 — "7" iv / � L077/39./04c . L0T9 /07S`ec:... I ` '5.. / .4- . ,I C j ?I� LOT1 (79) ? I /7.60 11�,II 4 k it i n i I V l M T ) 6' 640,87G z A Or • co , K t. First American Title Company of Spokane Wes( 704 First Avenuee Spokane, Washington 99204 • (50.9) 456.0550 ORDER N0. (P rya/ MAP °. FACE_ / SEC_ TWP 0Z,5 /y IZ754c. . .� L_ - OF E COUNTY ESSOR 623.554c.,,.. </ 1 This sketch is furnished as a courtesy only by First American Title Insurance Company and it is NOT a part of any title commitment or policy of title insurance. This sketch is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and does not purport to show all highways, roads or easements affecting the property i• No reliance should be placed upon this sketch for the location or dimensions of the property and no liability is assumed for the correctness thereof. :1dili ii iE Flca Arnrnrnn Tdr In.urnnn'(ln ei r 1 6 March 19, 1990 Spokane County Public Works Department Spokane County Engineer Attn: Verril Smale N. 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 Subject: Sullivan Park Waterline Extensions Dear Verril: This letter is 'in response to your March 16,1990 letter to Simpson Engineering concerning the proposed watermain extensions to the Sullivan Park Center. The water plan has been reviewed and approved by our District. The developer is required to convey all watermains and appurtenances to the District. After acceptance by the District, all of the new facilities will become part of the District's system for operation and maintenance. Where waterlines are installed in proposed road rights -of- way it is understood and agreed that Spokane County has prior rights` to these- rights -of -way, and the installation is subject to the terms of the agreement between :Spokane County and the United States Bureau of. Reclamation. Any permits will be obtained by the contractor for work specified on the approved plans. Sincerely, / ] obert 0. Ashcraf Manager ROA:jm RECEIVED 1 NAR 2 1 1990 j S1'uttMEE COI.1TY EN 1 I CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT NORTH 120 GREENACRES ROAD • GREENACRES, WASHINGTON 99016 • 924 -3655 Drainage easements is platted and shown herec , which are for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted. The County of Spokane is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all drainage easements adjacent to the public right -of- way. The property owner shall maintain the drainage swale with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage swale as indicated by the approved plans. The owners of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 and lot 2, Block 2 or their successors in interest shall be responsible for the operation and - maintenance of the drainage swales, landscaped median, sprinkler systems and street lights within the public right of way adjacent to said lots in accordance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineers Office. Maintenance work to be performed shall include but not be limited to fertilization, pruning, moving and maintenance and operation of the sprinkler systems and street lights. Whenever the owners of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 and lot 2, Block 2 or their successors in interest shall fail to maintain the drainage swales, landscaped median, sprinkler systems and street lights within the public right of way adjacent to said lots in accordance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineers Office, a notice will bb given to the owners of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 and lot 2, Block 2 or their successors in interest by Spokane County. If not corrected after 10 days, the County has the the right to correct the maintenance failure or have it corrected. All costs involved will be charged to the owners of Lots 1 and 2, Block l- and lot 2, Block 2 or their successors in interest. Appropriate permits shall be obtained prior to any work being done within the County right- -of -way. SVOn4NC COeNTY coder «ausc Simpson Engineers, Inc. N. 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA 99212 Attention: Richard L. Simpson Dear Dick: 0110v / VS /lmb March 16, 1990 I "NI : k( Tr PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 Subject: Sullivan Park Center - Waterlines Consolidated Water District Your plan for construction of water mains to av the Sullivan Park Center have been reviewed by this office. Since this installation will become part of Consolidated Irrigation District's system, it will be necessary that the district provide a letter certifying the following: 1) That the plan is approved and upon completion and acceptance of the installation it will become part of the District's system. 2) Where the lines are installed in proposed road rights -of -way, it is understood and agreed that Spokane County has prior rights to these rights -of -way, and the installation is subject to the terms of the agreement between Spokane County and the Bureau of Reclamation, notably Article 11. This letter should be addressed to the Spokane County Engineer and must be submitted prior to issuance of a permit for the work. The plan review is near completion and additional comments should be available by Friday afternoon, March 16th. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Verril (S male Engineering Administrator Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 ASSIGNMENT For security purposes only, R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation, hereby assigns to SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, the following: U.S. Government Obligations, Saloman Government Backed Repurchase Agreement, or other investments as approved by the parties hereto, in the face amount of $1,906,470.00 and held in and by Seattle First National k Bank, Spo n a Fra t n. e h (70 VA_ This Assignment is made as security for the full and faithful performance by R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. of the construction of certain roads, drainage swales, landscaping, sprinkler system and street lighting, as specified in the typical section and roadway improvement specifications for said subdivision, dated April 17( 1990 and on file in the Office of the County Engineer, and the landscape plans for said subdivision dated April 12, 1990, and on file in the Office of the County Planning Department Any interest benefits accruing under said investment funds shall remain the property of R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. Said investment funds are to be released to R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. or any other party only with the prior written consent and agreement of Spokane County. PROVIDED, the undersigned does hereby authorize Seattle First National Bank to pay over to Spokane County all or a sufficient portion of the moneys in the investment funds referenced hereinabove upon written documentation being received from Spokane County indicating that the purposes for which the investment funds were assigned have not been fully and faithfully performed as required and a statement of that amount of money which the County deems necessary to complete such obligation. Upon receipt of such written documentation, R.A. Hanson Company hereby authorizes Seattle First National Bank to release to Spokane County that amount of money requested up to the maximum amount in the investment funds account. PROVIDED, FURTHER, that R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. shall have the right to direct the investment of the funds which are subject to this Assignment, and, therefore, this Assignment shall be effective as to any such investment account By �/< Dated this APPROVED AS TO FORM: day of May, 1990. SPOKANE COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE c SEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL BANK By 1 (441 a k diuiL J Dated this Q day of May, 1990. R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. By 6. (t. R.A. Hanson - President 5 ieeo. £ :FJo�i Pig ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW Michael C. Dempsey Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney - Civil Division W. 1115 Broadway Spokane, Washington 99260 -0270 Dear Mike: Re: Sullivan Park Center May 18, 1990 DREW M. BODKER Attorney at Law DMB /slm Enclosures cc: R.A. Hanson Company Chris Olsen - Price Development Company S. 1401 GRAND BLVD.. SUITE 203 NORTH t. ra, anO ras/'r ton .9.9Pa9 (509) 456-5100 FAX: (509) 456 -5114 Per my conference with you earlier this month, I have now received and enclose herewith the original, executed Assignment Agreement between R.A. Hanson Company and Spokane County. Also enclosed please find an original Request for Full Reconveyance. Would you please process this Request for Full Reconveyance as soon as possible so that we can obtain a release of the Deed of Trust in favor of Spokane County which currently encumbers the property which we have conveyed to Price Development Company. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please give me a call. Thank you very much for your continued cooperation in this matter. The undersigned beneficiary is a party to that certain Developer Agreement dated April 6, 1990, in which R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. obligated itself to Spokane County in the amount of $1,906,470.00 for the construction of certain improvements set forth in said Developer Agreement. The Developer Agreement was then secured by that certain Deed of Trust dated April 6, 1990, in which R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. is grantor and First American Title Insurance Company is trustee, filed for record on May 4, 1990, as Auditor's File No. 9005040326, and recorded in Volume 1109 of Mortgages, at page 66, records of Spokane County, Washington. There was no promissory note executed by R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., and therefore no promissory note is being surrendered herewith. The obligations and indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust now having been fully secured by other security, the Deed of Trust is herewith surrendered to you for cancellation and reconveyance. You are therefore requested, upon payment of all sums owing to you, to reconvey without warranty, to the person(s) entitled thereto, the right, title and interest now held by you thereunder. Dated this day of May, 1990. ATTEST: William E. Donahue Clerk of the Board By APPROVED AS TO FORM: REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEYANCE Deputy Clerk Spokane County Prosecutor's Office BY /7� �r / / Michael C. Dempsey - _ty Approved pursuant i Resolution 90 -0479 SPOKANE COUNTY By Patricia A. Mummey - Chairman, Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington lead o -^ c_.. , C i o //r PROJECT Sullivan Park Center PE1504 DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Drywell - Type A 2) Drywell - Type 8 3) Grate - Type 1 4) Grate Type 2 5) Grate ~ Type 3 6) Backfill For DW 7) Concrete Inlet 8) C.M. Pipe 10" Dia. 3) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. 12) Precast Manhole 13) Solid lid 14) Ditch Excavation 15) Sod NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Concrete Cross Gutter 2) Grass Seeding 3) Curb cuts with "tails" 4) Wilbert Vault #1840 5) 16) Monuments 17) Barricade 18) Street Signs GRADING, SURFACING CURB AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade 20) Top Course 21) Base Course 22) Asphalt Concrete 23) Curb Type A 24) Curb Type B 25) Curb Type R 26) Sidewalk NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 1) Indiana Ave Removal 2) Remove Curb and Sidewalk along Sullivan 3) Traffic Signal 4) Street Lights 5) Striping and Signs 111 60ND ESTIMATE NAME J Sims UNITS EA EA EA EA EA CY EA LF LF LF LF EA EA CY SF SY ACRES EA EA • DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL EA LF EA OTHER SUBTOTAL CY 45693.3 CY 3643.2 CY 7286"3 Tons 14937 LF 10000 LF 13371.7 LF SO YD 8399^1 CY LF LS LS LS GRAND TOTAL �� / '7�\ vv~~� / / v^� ~ �r / QUANITY PRICE 13 1250.00 2 1450^()0 310.00 330.00 13 320"00 470 11.25 575.00 12.00 16.50 18.00 21^00 1435.00 300.00 2359 8.50 106174 0.50 85 14.00 0.64 2500^00 103 65.00 1 300.00 10 140.00 32.00 75.00 800 17.00 70() 15.00 1 85000.00 1 66200.00 1 14250^00 GRADING AND SURFACING DATE 14-Mar-90 COST 16250.00 2900.00 0.00 0"00 4160.00 5287.50 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20051.50 53087.00 1190.00 1600.00 6695.00 300.00 0^00 111521^00 1400.00 0.00 0"00 1400.00 8,50 388393.05 10.60 38617^92 10.60 77234.78 40.00 597480,00 5.60 56000"00 7.10 94939^07 6.50 0.00 14.00 117587.40 13600,00 1050o"00 85000.00 66200.00 14250.00 1559802.22 11)672723.22 PROJECT Item If 1) Drywell 2) Drywell 3) Grate - 4) Grate 5) Grate S I_ r \ -JI A fT Std - Type - Type Type 1 - Type - Type 0 Drainage items 2 3 A B 6) Backfill for DW 7) Concrete inlet 8) C.M. pipe 10" dia. 9) C.M. pipe 12" dia. 10) C.M. pipe 15" dia. 11) C.M. pipe 18" dia. 12) Precast Manhole 13) Solid Lid 14) Ditch Excavation 15) Sod Non Standard Drainage Items 1) Co cr�. Cr s 2) �rw S jc, ^� Dwl BOND EST FORM (4rr / <NAME tom( A4 l c • Units EA EA EA EA EA CY EA LF LF LF LF EA EA Quantity 1 a- Price GY , 0j3s SF /Obif`I I 3) G U '2g CATS r, ° 3 S U 4) w/1 - et' kr 1IAU1-r k PO R Cu>?g — I`'t'Yt -3 3 au 'u b 6errr Cr 1�AfDia '\ 51.a — A a� .YRPIA s a Sra .1VA 0 T E pR E So) j& i oev_ pA( 1/6(A /4U ANP SY)cEET •jd-r5 • amo • Dia DATE C - L: re — c r\ E,c/K W 1T it■ E ‘N - Ft 1S — !° AS(1 DI cb vANTr y°r2�6 Cx', sS I� R S 19ir oa ./ (�ro� OTIIC - „ 1> (,;+a)3 cn ..,— 3 2) (ci a-- 6 a-- S EE 3) CO) -a- y ;-_. WW1 4) qi _ _ (E- ht. ' 1 q 1 .2-- • 5) So 30 6) 30 3/ 7 ) (Q-)..,3-__ °I U I D 3 ri 8) I 3° • I 1 9)/4 i3 a �4 ?0 1 03 13 1 PROJECT Item If 1) Drywell 2) Drywell 3) Grate - 4) Grate 5) Grate S I_ r \ -JI A fT Std - Type - Type Type 1 - Type - Type 0 Drainage items 2 3 A B 6) Backfill for DW 7) Concrete inlet 8) C.M. pipe 10" dia. 9) C.M. pipe 12" dia. 10) C.M. pipe 15" dia. 11) C.M. pipe 18" dia. 12) Precast Manhole 13) Solid Lid 14) Ditch Excavation 15) Sod Non Standard Drainage Items 1) Co cr�. Cr s 2) �rw S jc, ^� Dwl BOND EST FORM (4rr / <NAME tom( A4 l c • Units EA EA EA EA EA CY EA LF LF LF LF EA EA Quantity 1 a- Price GY , 0j3s SF /Obif`I I 3) G U '2g CATS r, ° 3 S U 4) w/1 - et' kr 1IAU1-r k PO R Cu>?g — I`'t'Yt -3 3 au 'u b 6errr Cr 1�AfDia '\ 51.a — A a� .YRPIA s a Sra .1VA 0 T E pR E So) j& i oev_ pA( 1/6(A /4U ANP SY)cEET •jd-r5 • amo • Dia DATE C - L: re — c r\ E,c/K W 1T it■ E ‘N - Ft 1S — !° AS(1 DI cb vANTr y°r2�6 Cx', sS I� R S 19ir oa ./ (�ro� OTIIC S EE sw6 —?� i� A • VE ��Gr;P= E�1 S9fi002. +p / - 0 oo = LI a a3.5 Joj03e 03,3' t_Q.ck_ S; at 1 a_ 0 lo. 1 a U�s. lol +ao 0151o.5 2SIa,5�R�a�' 308".` -D a- So o / i ∎ r 74 - s -Pt. FIVE 0 1 -1- ea---e0 13 bt 3 - 3.S ÷ Sti L_L_\ ) L l' sTAT a- b t 3 5 1'' 1 y e-7"7 6= a 36 . -0 SQLL 1LHIN- 2 DI *" (S- 74 - \,o_`) LT a- aT is 0+57 ) 7 4 6 ; - - 7n , 7 -r i s a ( +a LS') t 6 e- _ c3 - -Ft, 82± S.S -a --3 743_x - + \G v 6 17, g X I o / 0(,, 1-4 -r 1'x i2 x O I h SEcT(o.I st 61 -et 1,a 4n `) , M Y— b n- .2„3,5-01. Y u 4c12, nrfie - Go a?, SURFACE AREA - ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COU, _ CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE_ ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB TYPE 8 SIDEWALK BEGINNING STATION = TERM # 1 : CHOPPED TERM # 2 : CHOPPED SURFACE AREA - ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB TYPE A BEGINNING STATION = TERM # 1 : CHOPPED TERM # 2 : CHOPPED ITEM SURFACE AREA - ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE BEGINNING STATION = TERM # 1 : CHOPPED TERM # 2 : CHOPPED ITEM SURFACE AREA - ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE TOTALS EXISTING EXISTING STREET # 9 NAME- WEST SLIP RAMP LENGTH- 2571.30 S.F. 2.00 FT. 0.17 FT. 0.33 FT. 0.33 FT. 0.00 FT. 0.00 S.Y. STREET # 8 NAME- TRAFFIC: ISLANDS LENGTH- 5000.00 FT. T. ITEM MEASUREMENT 0.00 ENDING STATION = 5000.00 80000.00 S.F. 0.67 FT. 0.00 FT. 0.00 FT. 0.00 FT. EXISTING 0.00 FT. 612.31 FT. 923.75 ENDING STATION = 1536.06 MEASUREMENT 14695.44 S.F. 2.00 FT. 0.17 FT. 0.33 FT. 0.33 FT. STREET # 10 NAME- SLIP RAMP EAST LENGTH- 527.39 FT. 627.05 ENDING STATION = 1154.44 MEASUREMENT 12657.36 S.F. 2.00 FT. 0.17 FT. 0.33 FT. 0.33 FT. ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB TYPE A CURB TYPE 8 SIDEWALK PROPOSED PROPOSED SIDEWALK Tflat.- rt (00°LF K36 tit i -27 SOo 197.9 C.Y. 15.5 C.Y. 33.0 C.Y. 67.6 TONS 267.1 FT. 178.1 S.Y. WIDTH- 16.00 F QUANTITY 1975.3 C.Y. 0.0 C.Y. 0.0 C.Y. 0.0 TONS PROPOSED 10000.0 FT. WIDTH - 24.00 FT QUANTITY 1088.6 C.Y. 90.7 C.Y. 181.4 C.Y. 371.9 TONS WIDTH- 24.00 FT QUANTITY 937.6 C.Y. 78.1 C.Y. 156.3 C.Y. 320.3 TONS 5693.3 C.Y. 3643.2 C.Y. 7286.3 C.Y. 14937.0 TONS 10000.0 FT. 13371.7 FT. 8399.1 S.Y. INTER # 1 FULL INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 24.00 TERM # 1 : CHOPPED TERM # 2 : CHOPPED ITEM SURFACE AREA- 247798.83 S.F. ROADWAY EXCAVATION 2.00 FT. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE 0.17 FT. CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 0.33 FT. ASPHALT CONCRETE 0.33 FT. CURB TYPE B EXISTING 0.00 FT. SIDEWALK EXISTING 0.00 S.Y. ITEM ITEM SURFACE AREA - ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB TYPE B EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING SURFACE AREA - ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB TYPE 8 EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING MEASUREMENT QUANTITY STREET # 5 NAME- INDIANA 146 +53 TO 153 +02 LENGTH- 649.00 FT. WIDTH - 80.00 FT. BEGINNING STATION = 14653.00 ENDING STATION = 15302.00 INTER # 1 FULL INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 80.00 SK = 20.00 RAD = 55.00 TERM # 1 : CHOPPED TERM # 2 : CHOPPED MEASUREMENT QUANTITY 95563.35 S.F. 2.00 FT. 0.17 FT. 0.33 FT. 0.33 FT. 0.00 FT. 0.00 S.Y. STREET # 6 NAME- INDIANA 15302 TO 157 +60 LENGTH- 458.70 FT. WIDTH - 58.00 FT. BEGINNING STATION = 15302.00 ENDING STATION = 15760.70 INTER # 1 T INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 120.00 SK = 0.00 RAD = 40.00 TERM # 1 : CHOPPED TERM # 2 : CHOPPED MEASUREMENT QUANTITY 32091.33 S.F. 2.00 FT. 0.17 FT. 0.33 FT. 0.33 FT. 0.00 FT. 0.00 S.Y. SK = 60.00 RAD = 20.00 STREET # 7 NAME- SULLIVAN ROAD LENGTH- 513.00 FT. WIDTH- 10.00 FT. BEGINNING STATION = 4887.00 ENDING STATION = 5400.00 ONE SIDE ONLY PWIDTH= 40.00 EWIDTH= 30.00 QWIDTH= 0.00 INTER # 1 T EXCLUDED ISWIDTH = 80.00 SK = 20.00 RAD = 55.00 TERM # 1 : CHOPPED TERM #.2 : CHOPPED 18355.5 C.Y. 1529.6 C.Y. 3059.2 C.Y. 6271.5 TONS PROPOSED 8604.5 FT. PROPOSED 5736.3 S.Y. 7078.8 C.Y. 589.9 C.Y. 1179.8 C.Y. 2418.6 TONS PROPOSED 2884.0 FT. PROPOSED 1922.7 S.Y. 2377.1 C.Y. 198.1 C.Y. 396.2 C.Y. 812.2 TONS PROPOSED 843.1 FT. PROPOSED 562.0 S.Y. ITEM MEASUREMENT QUANTITY PROJECT NO.- PE1504 DESIGNER- J SIMS PROJECT DESCRIPTION- Sullivan Park Center ITEM SURFACE AREA- 36151.28 S.F. ROADWAY EXCAVATION 2.00 FT. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE 0"17 FT. CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 0.33 FT. ASPHALT CONCRETE 0.33 FT. CURB TYPE R EXISTING 0.00 FT. ITEM • SURFACE AREA- 2643"48 S.F. ROADWAY EXCAVATION 2.00 FT. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE 0.17 FT. CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 0.33 FT. ASPHALT CONCRETE 0.33 FT. CURB TYPE B EXISTING 0.00 FT. ITEM SURFACE AREA- ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE STREET QUANTITIES 145920.00 S.F. 2.00 FT. 0.17 FT. ().33 FT. 0.33 FT. DATE- 3/10/90 STREET # 1 NAME- INDIANA 58+87 TO 65+27 LENGTH- 639.32 FT. WIDTH- 54.50 FT, BEGINNING STATION = 5887.68 ENDING STATION = 6527.00 ONE SIDE ONLY PWIDTH= 34.50 EWIDTH= 0.00 WIDTH= 20"00 INTER # 1 T INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 36.00 SK = 0.00 RAD = 20"00 TERM # 1 : CHOPPED TERM # 2 : TAPER TAPER LENGTH = 50,00 MEASUREMENT QUANTITY 2677.9 C.Y. 223.2 C.Y. 446.3 C.Y. 914.9 TONS PROPOSED 626.2 FT. STREET # 2 NAME- INDIANA ST INTERSECTION LENGTH- 127.93 FT" WIDTH- 36.00 FT. BEGINNING STATION = 2780.79 ENDING STATION = 2908.72 TERM # 1 : CHOPPED TERM # 2 : CROSS STREET EXCLUDED EW 0.00 PW 34.50 SK 0"00 RAD 20.00 MEASUREMENT QUANTITY 195.8 C.Y. 16.3 C.V. 32^6 C.V. 66.9 TONS PROPOSED 146.9 FT. STREET # 3 NAME- INDIANA 65+27 TO 101+75 LENGTH- 3648.00 FT. WIDTH~ 40"00 FT. BEGINNING STATION = 6527.00 ENDING STATION = 10175.00 TERM # 1 : CHOPPED TERM # 2 : TAPER TAPER LENGTH = 286"00 MEASUREMENT QUANTITY 10808"9 C.Y. 900^7 C.Y. 1801.5 C.Y. 3693.0 TONS STREET # 4 NAME- INDIANA 101+75 TO 146+53 LENGTH- 4478.00 FT" 55.00 FT. BEGINNING STATION = 10175.00 ENDING STATION = 14653.00 WIDTH- y • • ♦ • ♦ * ♦ * • * * * * • • • * • • FACSIMIL », TRANSMISSIO\ • W Y ♦ * • Y i r * * • +K * * * * * * T x ♦- * SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER N. 811 JEFFERSON ST. SPOKANE, WA 99260 -0180 FAX (509) 456 -4715 TEL (509) 456 -3600 DATE: 3- q0 TIME: (0. 30 TO: ,So DEPARTMENT: FAX TELEPHONE: 9 — 13 . 3 • VOICE TELEPHONE: FROM: G — . Yg4,\So DEPARTMENT: 1 c 33 COMMENTS: v� UA V PAGE _ OF _ FFROM ANC ' DIST NOr 1 EAST TO Block 1 sideline PE1504 4/13/90 AUTO INVERSE ***** START 4546,15044 3972"14460 14 14 INV N 77 54 39.0 W 216.8600 4591.56823 3760.09393 15 15 INV N 76 55 02.0 W 1550.2000 4942.46923 2250"13084 16 16 INV N 76 10 41.0 W 620"0000 5090,59057 1648.08428 17 17 INV N 56 26 27.0 W 778"5000 5520.94366 999.34823 18 18 INV N 6 28 18.0 W 865.0000 6380^43163 901.85246 35 RADIAL S 6 28 18"0 E DELTA 6 52 20.0 LT RADIUS 6769,5600 TAN 406.4678 L-ARC 811.9607 RADIAL 8 13 20 38"0 E RP 13106.85406 138.84270 36 35 CHORD N 80 05 32.0 E 811.4741 6520.05615 1701.22418 37 TAN@PT N 76 39 22.0 E RADIAL N 13 20 38"0 W DELTA 50 13 37.0 RT RADIUS 1462.0000 TAN 685"2701 L-ARC 1281"6266 RADIAL N 36 52 59.0 E RP 5097.52669 2038.64666 38 37 CHORD S 78 13 49.5 E 1240.9817 6266.92521 2916.11524 39 TAN@PT S 57 07 01.0 E 39 INV S 53 07 01,0 E 734,3500 6066.25379 3183,54916 40 RADIAL N 36 52 59"0 E DELTA 29 07 01.0 RT RADIUS 917.0000 TAN 238,1510 L-ARC 466^0071 RADIAL N 66 00 00.0 E RP 5332.78016 2633"18070 41 40 CHORD S 38 33 3()"5 E 461.0087 5705.75766 3470.90189 42 TAN@PT S 24 00 00.0 E 42 INV S 24 00 00.0 E 220.0000 5504.77766 3560.38395 43 RADIAL S 66 00 00.0 W DELTA 57 15 36.0 LT RADIUS 993"0000 TAN 542.0759 L-ARC 992.3799 RADIAL S 8 44 24.0 W RP 5908"66715 4467.53459 44 43 CHORD S 52 37 48.0 E 951.5949 4927.19782 4316.64736 45 TAN@PT S 81 15 36"() E 45 INV S B 44 24,0 W 22°0000 4905.45328 4313.30444 46 46 INV S 81 15 36,0 E 236.5700 4869.50626 4547"12740 47 47 INV 8 60 36 59.0 E 110.4600 4815.30856 4643.37719 48 RADIAL N 40 23 36"0 E DELTA 6259 20.0 RT RADIUS 87.0000 TAN 53"3021 L-ARC 95.6446 RADIAL S 76 37 ()4,0 E RP 4749,04817 4586.99847 97 48 CHORD S 18 06 44.0 E 90.9004 4728.91236 4671.63622 98. TAN@PT S 13 22 56"0 W RADIAL S 76 37 04.0 E DELTA 72 42 38.0 RT RADIUS 200"0000 TAN 147.2119 ---L-ARC --^- -- 253:E077 -- 7 - ' RADIAL R 3 54 26.0 E RP 4775.20157 4477.06667 49 98 CHORD S 49 44 15.0 N 237"1162 4575.66643 4490.69488 5() TAN@PT S 86 05 34.0 W 50 INV S 3 54 26.0 E 4.5000 4571.17689 4491.00152 51 51 INV S 87 14 19.0 W 519.4700 4546.15056 3972^13471 52 LAT & DEP -0.00012 0.00989 52 HCLOSE S 89 17 51.9 E 0.0099 4546.15044 3972.14460 14 PREC = 1 TO 948426 Area = 4069676.17 sq ft 93.42691 ac FROM ANSI DIST NOR" EAST TO PE1504 West r/w dedication to state 4/16/90 AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 4869.50626 4547.12740 47 47 INV S 60 36 59.0 E 110.4600 4815.30856 4643.37719 48 RADIAL N 40 23 36.0 E DELTA 62 59 20.0 RT RADIUS 87.0000 TAN 53.3021 L -ARC 95.6446 RADIAL S 76 37 04.0 E RP 4749.04817 4586.99847 97 48 CHORD S 18 06 44.0 E 90.9004 4728.91236 4671.63622 98 TAN @PT S 13 22 56.0 W RADIAL S 76 37 04.0 E DELTA 72 42 38.0 RT RADIUS 200.0000 TAN 147.2119 L -ARC 253.8077 RADIAL S 3 54 26.0 E RP 4775.20157 4477.06667 49 98 CHORD S 49 44 15.0 W 237.1162 4575.66643 4490.69488 50 TAN@PT S 86 05 34.0 W 50 INV S 3 54 26.0 E 4.5000 4571. 17689 4491.00152 51 51 INV N 87 14 19.0 E 399.1400 4590.40613 4889.67805 68 68 INV N 16 00 45.0 E 204.9500 4787.40439 4946.21290 73 73 INV N 74 43 39.0 W 180.2500 4834.88405 4772.32862 72 72 INV N 81 15 36.0 W 227.8400 4869.50454 4547.13429 71 LAT &. DEP 0.00172 - 0.00688 71 HCLOSE N 75 56 55.7 W 0.0071 4869.50626 4547.12740 47 PREC = 1 TO 208105 Area = 70341.78 sq ft 1.61482 ac FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO East r/w dedication to state AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 4570.38774 5719.63768 9 9 INV S 37 11 15.0 W 126.0300 4469.98445 5643.46195 10 RADIAL N 38 25 17.0 E DELTA 41 10 58.0 LT RADIUS 633.0000 TAN 237.8205 L -ARC 454.9846 RADIAL N 2 45 41.0 W RP 3974.05370 5250.09025 11 10 CHORD N 72 10 12.0 W 445.2534 4606.31828 5219.59441 12 TAN@PT S 87 14 19.0 W 12 INV S 87 14 19.0 W 85.2900 4602.20929 5134.40345 75 75 INV N 16 20 26.0 W 170.5100 4765.83178 5086.43114 76 76 INV S 74 37 41.0 E 463.2000 4643.04487 5533.06031 77 77 INV S 68 43 18.0 E 200.2300 4570.38163 5719.64033 79 LAT & DEP 0.00611 - 0.00266 79 HCLOSE N 23 30 36.7 W 0.0067 4570.38774 5719.63768 9 PREC = 1 TO 225170 Area = 63716.32 sq ft 1.46273 ac � v ` ~ Workfile: PE1504.L3D closed Workfile: PE1504.L3D ready for use. Room for 96 points. Current Directory: C:\LLCOGO\WORK 1419264 Bytes free space available (35481 Points). Sat Jan 20 11:06:13 1990 Points 80 to 96 deleted. 96 points in workfile. FROM ANGLE QIGT NORTH EAST TO _== == Street Centerline PE1504 1/20/90 ***** START 4651.31816 5763,38000 8 8*9 BEARING 8 TRAV S 28 23 47.0 W 42~0000 4614.37166 5743.41611 80 9*8 BEARING RADIAL N 28 23 47^0 E DELTA 12 16 46.0 LT RADIUS 1400°(}000 TAN 150.5986 L-ARC 300.0434 RADIAL N 16 07 01.0 E RP 3382"82170 5077.61984 81 8(} CHORD N 67 44 36^0 W 299.4695 4727.79764 5466.25813 82 TAN@PT N 73 52 59^0 W 82 TRAV N 73 52 58.0 W 470"4400 4858°39340 5014"30842 83 83 TRAV N 81 15 36.0 W 7^6000 4859.54822 5006^79667 84 84 SSINV N 2 46 13.7 W 140.6161 5000^00000 5000"00000 1 DEFL 0 00 00"0 RT 84 TRAV N 81 15 36.0 W 692"4000 4964.75901 4322.43679 85 RADIAL S 8 44 24.0 W DELTA 57 15 36"0 RT RADIUS 955"0000 TAN 521.3318 L-ARC 954.4036 RADIAL S 66 00 00"0 W RP 5908"66960 4467^54988 86 85 CHORD N 52 37 48.0 W 915.1794 5520.23610 3595.11397 87 TAN@PT N 24 00 00.0 W DEFL, 0 00 00^0 RT � 87 TRAV M 24 00 00.0 W 220"0000 5721,21610 3505.63191 88 RADIAL N 66 00 00.0 E DELTA 29 07 81,0 LT RADIUS 955.0000 TAN 248°0199 L-ARC 485.3182 RADIAL m 36 52 59.0 E RP 5332.78261 2633.19599 89 88 CHORD W 38 33 30.5 W 480.1127 6096^65100 3206.37143 90 TAN@PT N 53 07 {}1"0 W DEFL 0 00 00"0 RT 90 TRAV N 53 07 01.0 W 334^3500 6297.32242 2938.93751 91 RADIAL N 36 52 59.0 E DELTA 50 13 37"0 LT RADIUS 1500.0000 TAN 703,0815 L-ARC 1314.9383 RADIAL N 13 20 38.(} W RP 5097.52914 2038.66195 92 91 CHORD m 78 13 49.5 W 1273.2370 6557.03269 1692"48926 93 TAN@PT S 76 39 22.0 W RADIAL S 13 20 38^0 E DELTA 6 52 20.0 RT RADIUS 6731.5600 �_ARC 807^4029 RADIAL S 6 28 18.0 E RP 13106.85651 138.85799 94 93 CHORD S 80 05 32"0 W 806.9190 6418.19193 897.58470 95 TAN@PT S 83 31 42.0 W 18*19 BEARING 95 TRAV N 6 28 18.0 W 47"0000 6464.89244 892.28724 96 LAT & DEP -0^00245 -0^01529 96 HCLOSE S 80 54 04.1 W 0,0155 6464.88999 892.27195 19 PREC = 1 TO 366531 No Area 21 TRAV N 72 14 37.0 E 551.7200 6908.99279 2702.87333 22 RADIAL S 53 51 00.0 W DELTA 9 28 38.0 LT RADIUS 964.9500 TAN 79.9880 L -ARC 159.6112 RADIAL S 44 22 22.0 W RP 7478.21799 3482.04672 23 22 CHORD S 40 53 19.0 E 159.4293 6788.46689 2807.23422 24 TAN@PT S 45 37 38.0 E DEFL 0 00 00.0 RT 24 TRAV S 45 37 38.0 E 912.0300 6150.66260 3459.15784 25 RADIAL S 44 22 22.0 W DELTA 11 48 30.0 LT RADIUS 2874.8000 TAN 297.2930 L -ARC 592.4799 RADIAL S 32 33 52.0 W RP 8205.58407 5469.57391 26 25 CHORD S 51 31 53.0 E 591.4319 5782.74123 3922.21889 27 TAN @PT S 57 26 08.0 E DEFL 0 00 00.0 RT 27 TRAV S 57 26 08.0 E 588.0900 5466.20303 4417.85324 28 28 TRAV S 32 33 52.0 W 10.0000 5457.77516 4412.47076 29 RADIAL S 32 33 52.0 W DELTA 5 59 36.0 LT RADIUS 5749.5800 TAN 300.9873 L -ARC 601.4256 RADIAL S 26 34 16.0 W RP 10303.44400 7507.17005 30 29 CHORD S 60 25 56.0 E 601.1515 5161.13529 4935.33581 31 TAN @PT S 63 25 44.0 E 31 TRAV S 3 24 03.0 E 164.4000 4997.02481 4945.08817 32 32 TRAV S 2 46 23.0 E 37.2800 4959.78846 4946.89178 33 33 TRAV 8 69 57 29.0 E 59.6700 4939.33908 5002.94828 34 _ =__= = ___ LAT & DEP 0.01202 - 0.01064 34 HCLOSE N 41 30 50.7 W 0.0161 4939.35110 5002.93764 2 PREC = 1 TO 738248 Area = 5784489.04 sq ft 132.79360 ac Workfile: PE1504.L3D closed Workfile: PE1504.L3D ready for use. Room for 34 points.. Current Directory: C: \LLCOGO \WORK 1423360 Bytes free space available (35584 Points). Sat Jan 20 09:42:10 1990 Points 3 to 34 deleted. 34 points in workfile. FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO Plat Boundary PE1504 1/20/90 * * * ** START 4939.35110 5002.93764 2 2 TRAV S 69 57 29.0 E 81.3700 4911.46496 5079.38003 3 RADIAL S 87 13 37.0 W DELTA 71 06 35.0 LT RADIUS 40.0000 TAN 28.5895 L -ARC 49.6440 RADIAL S 16 07 02.0 W RP 4913.40016 5119.33319 4 3 CHORD S 38 19 40.5 E 46.5186 4874.97233 ..5108.22905 5 TAN @PT S 73 52 58.0 E DEFL 0 00 00.0 RT 5 TRAV S 73 52 58.0 E 384.8200 4768.14497 5477.92399 6 RADIAL N 16 07 02.0 E DELTA 12 16 45.0 RT RADIUS 1442.0000 TAN 155.1130 L -ARC 309.0377 RADIAL N 28 23 47.0 E RP 3382.82170 5077.61984 7 6 CHORD S 67 44 35.5 E 308.4467 4651.31816 5763.39000 8 TAN @PT S 61 36 13.0 E 8 TRAV S 28 23 47.0 W 92.0000 4570.38774 5719.63768 9 9 TRAV S 37 11 15.0 W 126.0300 4469.98445 5643.46195 10 RADIAL N 38 25 17.0 E DELTA 41 10 58.0 LT RADIUS 633.0000 TAN 237.8205 L -ARC 454.9846 RADIAL N 2 45 41.0 W RP 3974.05330 5250.09025 11 10 CHORD N 72 10 12.0 W 445.2534 4606.31828 5219.59441 12 TAN@PT S 87 14 19.0 W DEFL 0 00 00.0 RT 12 TRAV S 87 14 19.0 W 200.2900 4596.66898 5019.53698 13 13 SSINV N 2 46 23.5 W 403.8039 5000.00000 5000.00000 1 DEFL 0 00 00.0 RT 13 TRAV S 87 14 19.0 W 1048.6100 4546.15044 3972.14460 14 14 TRAV N 77 54 39.0 W 216.8600 4591.56823 3760.09393 15 15 TRAY N 76 55 02.0 W 1550.2000 4942.46923 2250.13084 16 16 TRAV N 76 10 41.0 W 620.0000 5090.59057 1648.08428 17 17 TRAV N 56 26 27.0 W 778.5000 5520.94366 999.34823 18 18 TRAV N 6 28 18.0 W 950.0000 6464.88999 892.27195 19 RADIAL S 6 28 18.0 E DELTA 11 17 05.0 LT RADIUS 6684.5600 TAN 660.4169 L -ARC 1316.5612 RADIAL S 17 45 23.0 E RP 13106.85406 138.84270 20 19 CHORD N 77 53 09.5 E 1314.4343 6740.73447 2177.43628 21 TAN @PT N 72 14 37.0 E FROM ANGLE DIST =='"'""'"'= � ***** START 12*13 BEARING 12 TRAV S 87 14 19.0 W FROM ANGLE Block 3 Sideline PE1504 1/20/90 ***** START 12*13 BEARING 68 TRAV S 87 14 19.0 W RADIAL S 49 47 52.0 E DELTA 46 27 44.0 LT RADIUS 300^0000 TAN 128.7730 L-ARC 243.2756 RADIAL N 83 44 24.0 E RP 69 CHORD N 16 58 16.0 E TAN@PT N 6 15 36.0 W 71 TRAV N 6 15 36.0 W 72 TRAV S 74 43 39.0 E 73 TRAV S 16 00 45,0 W � 74 FROM ======....===-====== === � � Block 4 Sideline AUTO INVERSE ***** START RADIAL N 25 09 31^0 E DELTA 27 55 12^0 LT RADIUS 633.0000 TAN 157.3553 L-ARC 308.4583 RADIAL N 2 45 41°0 W RP 78 CHORD N 78 48 05.0 W TAN@PT S 87 14 19"0 W 12 INV S 87 14 19.0 W 75 INV N 16 20 26.0 W 76 INV S 74 37 41.0 E 77 INV S 8 12 46.0 W � == 330.2900 DIST =n:=====■= 183.6900 236.6646 27°13O0 180.2500 204.9500 305.4155 85.2900 170.5100 463.2000 97.0400 NORTH EAST TO 4606.31826 5219.59441 12 4590.40601 NORTH = = 4590.40601 4581.55644 4775.20263 4807.91474 4834.88297 4787.40331 4590.40505 LAT & DEP 0^00096 0.00564 HCLOSE N 80 23 11.5 E 0.0057 4590^40601 4889.68793 PREC = 1 TO 146621 Area = 36279.79 sq ft 0^83287 ac ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST �= 4547.00337 3974.05330 5250"09025 4606"31828 5219.59441 4602.20929 4765.83178 4643.04487 4547.00007 = = = � 4889.68793 EAST 4B89°68793 4706^21123 4477.07993 4775.29113 4772^33286 4946.21715 4889.68229 5519.19472 5134.40345 5086.43114 5533.06031 5519^19818 LAT & DEP 0"00330 -0.00345 79 HCLOSE N 46 18 18.3 W 0,0048 4547.00337 5519.19472 PREC = 1 TO 235499 Area = 45494.82 sq ft 1"04442 ac 68 TO 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 = = 68 TO 78 11 12 75 76 77 79 78 55 TRAV N 81 15 36.0 W 378.7500 4975.86914 4526.50861 56 DEFL 90 00 00.0 LT 56 TRAV S 8 44 24.0 W 4.0000 4971.91558 4525.90081 57 DEFL 90 00 00.0 RT 57 TRAY N 81 15 36.0 W 200.0000 5002.30576 4328.22320 58 RADIAL S 8 44 24.0 W DELTA 57 15 36.0 RT RADIUS 917.0000 TAN 500.5877 L -ARC 916.4274 RADIAL S 66 00 00.0 W RP 5908.65760 4467.56216 59 58 CHORD N 52 37 48.0 W 878.7639 5535.68010 3629.84097 60 TAN @PT N 24 00 00.0 W DEFL 0 00 00.0 RT 60 TRAV N 24 00 00.0 W 220.0000 5736.66010 3540.35891 61 RADIAL N 66 00 00.0 E DELTA 29 07 01.0 LT RADIUS 993.0000 TAN 257.8887 L -ARC 504.6292 RADIAL N 36 52 59.0 E RP 5332.77061 2633.20827 62 61 CHORD N 38 33 30.5 W 499.2166 6127.03376 3229.19069 63 TAN @PT N 53 07 01.0 W DEFL 90 00 00.0 RT 63 TRAY N 36 52 59.0 E 9.0000 6134.23252 3234.59234 64 DEFL 90 00 00.0 LT 64 TRAV N 53 07 01.0 W 334.3500 6334.90395 2967.15842 65 RADIAL N 36 52 59.0 E DELTA 50 13 37.0 LT RADIUS 1547.0000 TAN 725.1114 L -ARC 1356.1397 RADIAL N 13 20 38.0 W RP 5097.51714 2038.67423 66 65 • CHORD N 78 13 49.5 W 1313.1318 6602.75180 1681.63416 67 TAN @PT S 76 39 22.0 W LAT & DEP 0.00955 - 0.02757 67 HCLOSE N 70 53 27.3 W 0.0292 6602.76135 1681.60660 53 PREC = 1 TO 278520 Area = 1050063.95 sq ft 24.10615 ac Workfile: PE1504"L3D closed Workfile: RE1504°L3D ready for use. Room for 75 points. Current Directory: C:\LLCOGO\WDRK 1421312 Bytes free space available (35532 Points). Sat Jan 20 10:35:40 1990 Points 54 to 67 deleted. 75 points in workfile. FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH =■.= Block 2 Sideli ***** START RADIAL DELTA RADIUS TAN L-ARC RADIAL RP ne PE1504 1/20/90 S 13 20 38.0 E 4 24 45.0 LT 6684"56@0 257.5251 514.7957 S 17 45 23.0 E 53 CHORD N 74 26 59.5 E TAN@PT N 72 14 37.0 E 21 INV N 72 14 37"0 E RADIAL G 53 51 00.0 W DELTA 9 28 38.0 LT RADIUS 964.9500 TAN 79"9880 L-ARC 159.6112 RADIAL S 44 22 22.0 W RP 22 CHORD S 40 53 19.0 E TAN@PT S 45 37 38.0 E 24 INV G 45 37 38.0 E RADIAL S 44 22 22.0 W DELTA 11 48 30.0 LT RADIUS 2874.8000 TAN 297^2930 L-ARC 592.4799 RADIAL S 32 33 52.0 W RP 25 CHORD S 51 31 53.0 E TAN@PT S 57 26 08.0 E 27 INV S 57 26 08.0 E 28 INV S 32 33 52.0 W RADIAL S 32 33 52.0 W DELTA 5 59 36.0 LT RADIUS 5749°5800 TAN 300"9873 L-ARC 601.4256 RADIAL S 26 34 16.0 W RP 29 CHORD S 60 25 56.0 E TAN@PT S 63 25 44.0 E 31 INV S 3 24 03"0 E 32 INV G 2 46 23,0 E RADIAL N 87 13 37.0 E DELTA 101 30 47"0 RT RADIUS 40^0000 TAN 48.9689 L-ARC 70"8695 RADIAL S 8 44 24.0 W RP 33 CHORD S 47 59 00.5 W TAN@PT N 81 15 36.0 W = 591.4319 588.0900 10.0000 601^1515 164.4000 37.2800 � = = = EAST � 6602"76135 1681.60660 TO 53 13106.85406 138.84270 20 514.6685 6740.73447 2177.43628 21 551.7200 6908.99279 2702.87333 22 7478.21799 3482.04672 23 159.4293 6788.46689 2807.23422 24 912"0300 6150.66260 3459.15784 25 8205.58407 5469.57391 26 5782.74123 3922.21889 27 5466"20303 4417.85324 28 5457.77516 4412.47076 29 10303.44400 7507.17005 30 5161.13529 4935.33581 31 4997^02481 4945^08817 32 4959.78846 4946.89178 33 4957.85326 4906.93862 54 61.9572 4918.31774 4900,86058 55 Workfile: PE1504^k.3D closed Workfile: PE1504.L3D ready for use. Room for 52 points. Current Directory: C:\LLCOGO\WORK 1421312 Bytes free space available (35532 Points). Sat Jan 20 10:12:38 1990 Points 35 to 52 deleted. 52 points in workfile. FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH 40 42 = = = = Block 1 Sideline PE ***** START 14 INV N 77 15 INV N 76 16 INV N 76 17 INV N 56 18*19 BEARING 18 TRAV N 6 19*18 BEARING RADIAL G 6 DELTA 6 RADIUS TAN L-ARC RADIAL S 13 RP 35 CHORD N 80 TAN@PT N 76 RADIAL N 13 DELTA 50 RADIUS TAN L-ARC RADIAL N 36 RP 37 CHORD S 78 TAN@PT. S 53 DEFL 0 39 TRAV S 53 RADIAL N 36 DELTA 29 RADIUS TAN L-ARC RADIAL N 66 RP CHORD S 38 TAN@PT S 24 DEFL 0 TRAV S 24 RADIAL S 66 DELTA 57 RADIUS TAN L-ARC RADIAL S 8 RP 43 CHORD S 52 TANWT S 81 45 TRAY S 8 DEFL 90 46 TRAV S 81 47 TRAV S 60 RADIAL N '83 DELTA 92 RADIUS TAN L-ARC RADIAL S 3 RP 48 CHORD S 39 TAN@PT S 86 DEFL 90 50 TRAV S 3 12*14 BEARING 51 TRAV G 87 1504 1/20/90 54 39.0 W 55 02.0 W 10 41.0 W 26 27.0 W 28 18.0 W 28 18.0 E 52 20.0 LT 6769.5600 406.4678 811.9607 20 38.0 E 05 32.0 E 39 22.0 E 20 38.0 W 13 37.0 RT 1462.0000 685.2701 1281.6266 52 59.0 E 13 49.5 E 07 01.0 E 00 00.0 RT 07 01.0 E 52 59.0 E 07 01.0 RT 917.0000 238.1510 466.0071 00 00.0 E 33 30.5 E 00 00.0 E 00 00.0 RT 00 00.0 E 00 00.0 W 15 36.0 LT 993.0000 542.0759 992.3799 44 24.0 W 37 48.0 E 15 36.0 E 44 24.0 W 00 00.0 LT 15 36.0 E 36 59.0 E 44 24.O- E 21 10.0 RT 200.0000 208.3861 322.3720 54 26.0 E 54 59.0 W 05 34.0 W 00 00.0 LT 54 26.0 E 14 19.0 W = = = = 216.8600 1550.2000 620.0000 778.5000 865.0000 1240.9817 334.3500 461.0087 220.0000 288.5900 4.5000 519.4700 LAT & DEP 52 HCLOSE S 79 47 23.8 E 0.0143 4546. PREC = 1 TO 658240 Area = 4070163.34 sq ft 4546"15044 3972°14460 4591.56823 3760.09393 4942.46923 2250.13084 5090.59057 1648.08428 5520"94366 999.34823 6380.43163 901.85246 35 13106^85406 138"84270 36 811.4741 6520.05615 1701.22418 37 5097°52669 2038.64666 38 6266,92521 2916.11524 39 6066"25379 3183°54916 40 5332.78016 5705^75766 � EAST 2633.18070 3470.90189 5504.77766 3560.38395 5908.66715 4467.53459 951.5949 4927"19782 4316.64736 4775.20398 4575.66884 -0.00253 = = = TO 14 15 16 17 18 41 42 43 44 45 22.0000 4905.45328 4313.30444 46 236"5700 4869.50626 4547.12740 47 147.7500 4797"01206 4675.86999 48 4477.06252 49 4490.69073 50 4571.17930 4490"99737 51 4546.15297 3972,13056 52 0.01404 15044 3972.14460 14 93.43809 ac / �'v, ,` /O-p1 /'�� ,~v / Ave, ~ ^~~ ��_ /�iJ/� �� ---�., ' - 59+91.35 PI L= ().000 L/H Pt.= 0.000 @ 0 Grade= / "507% 59+01.35 67.450 59+25 67^570 59+50 67.697 59+75 67.823 60+00 67"750 60+25 68^077 60+50 68.203 . 60+75 68.330 ------ 61+00 68.457 61+25 68.583 . 61+50 68.710 61+75 68.837 62+00 68.963 62+25 69.090 62+50 69.217 69.217 62+75 69"315 69.343 63+00 69.357 69"470 63+00 PI L= 100.000 L/H Pt.= 69"358 CP 63+05"884 Grade= -.400% 63+0() 69"357 69.470 63+25 69^342 69.370 63+50 69.270 63+75 69.170 64+00 69"070 64+25 68.970 64+50 68.870 64+75 68.770 65+00 68.670 65+25 68.570 65+50 68.470 68,470 65+75 68.408 68.370 66+00 ' 68"420 68"`270 66+00 PI L= 100"000 L/H Pt.= 68.403 @ 65+83"333 Grade= .900% 66+00 68.420 68.270 66+25 68.508 68.470 66+50 68.670 66+75 68.870 67+00 69^070 67+25 69"270 67+50 69.470 .67+75 69.670 68+00 67"870 68+25 70,070 68+50 70.270 68+75 70,470 69+00 70,670 694.25 70.870 69+50 71.070 69+75 71.270 70+00 71"470 70+25 71.670� 70+50 71.870 70+75 72.070 71+00 72.270 71+25 72.470 71+50 72.670 71+75 72.870 72"870 72+00 73.070 72+25 73.270 • 72+50 73.470 72+75 73.670 73+00 73,870 PROFILE ~ �� _. 73+50 74,270 73+75 74,470 74+00 74.670 74+25 74.870 74+50 75.:70 74+75 75.270 75+00 75.470 75+25 75^670 75+50 75.870 75^970 75+75 76.029 76.070 76+00 76"108 76.270 76+00 PI L= 100"000 L/H Pt.= 76"116 @ 76+11.538 Grade= -.500% 76+00 76.108 76,270 76+25 76"104 76.145 76+50 76.020 76+75 75.895 77+00 75.770 77+25 75.645 77+50 75.520 77+75 75.395 78+00 75.270 78+25 75.145 78+50 75"020 75.020 78+75 74.926 74.895 .79+00 74.895 74.770 79+00 PI L= 100.000 L/H Pt.= 74.895 @ 78+99.923 Grade= .502% 79+00 74,895 74.770 79+25 74.927 74.895 79+50 75~021 79+75 75.146 80+00 75.272 30+25 75.397 90+50 75.522 80+75 75,648 81+00 75.773 81+25 75.898 81+50 76.024 81+75 76,149 76,149 82+0() 76.243 76^275 82+25 76.275 76.400 82+25 PI L= 100"000 L/H Pt.= 76"275 @ 82+25,033 Grade-' -.501% 82+25 76.275 76"400 82+50 76.243 76.275 82+75 76"150 83+00 76"024 83+25 75"899 83+50 75^774 83+75 75.649 84+00 75.523 84+25 75.398 84+50 75.273 84+75 75^148 85+00 75,023 85+25 74"897 85+50 74.772 85+75 74,647 86+00 74.522 86+25 74,397 86+50 74.271 86+75 74.146 87+00 74"021 87+25 73^896 87+50 73.770 73.770 87+75 73"676 73.645 88+00 73.645 73"520 ^` ' .^ � ^ 88+00 73.645 73.520 88+25 73"676 73.645 88+50 73.770 88+75 73.895 89+00 74.020 89+25 74.145 89+50 74.270 89+75 74.395 90+00 74.520 9()+25 74"645 90+50 74^770 90+75 74.895 �91+00 75.020 � 91+25 75.145 91+50 75.270 91+75 75.395 92+00 75.520 92+25 75.645 . 92+50 75"770 92+75 75.895 93+00 76.020 93+25 76.145 93+50 76.270 76.270 93+75 76,434 76`395 94+00 76^675 76.520 94+00 PI L= 10()"000 L/H Pt.= 76"169 @ 93+09.677 Grade= 1.740% 94+00 76.675 76"520 94+25 76"994 76.955 94+50 77.390 94+75 77.825 95+00 78.260 78.260 95+25 78.656 78.695 95+50 78.975 79.130 95+50 PI L= 100.000 L/H Pt.= 79.482 IP 96+40"43 Grade= .501% 95+50 78,975 79"130 95+75 79.217 79.255 96+00 79.380 96+25 79,506 96+50 79.631 96+75 79.756 97+00 79.881 97+25 80.007 97+50 80.132 97+75 80.257 9e+00 80^382 98+25 80.508 98+50 90"633 98+75 80.758 99+00 80"883 99+25 81,009 79+50 81.134 99+75 81"259 100+00 91.384 100+25 81^510 1()0+50 81,635 100+75 81^760 100+75 PI L- 0.000 L/H Pt.= 0.000 @ 0 Grade= CREST VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = "5()6710146745 GRADE #2 = -.4 DESIGN SPEED 45 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -916"75307864 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 100 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 312.54237287 SAG VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = -.4 GRADE #2 = .8 DESIGN SPEED 45 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -619^83050847 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 100 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 312.54237287 CREST VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = .8 GRADE #2 = -^5 DESIGN SPEED 45 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -450.29986964 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 100 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 312.54237287 SAG VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = GRADE #2 = "501538461538 DESIGN SPEED 45 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -866.51878465 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 100 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 312.34237287 CREST VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = "501538461538 GRADE #2 = -.500869565217 DESIGN SPEED 45 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -769.55691981 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 1()0 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 312.54237287 SAG VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = -.500869565217 GRADE #2 = ,5 DESIGN SPEED 45 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -867.51564592 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 100 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 312.54237287 SAG VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = .5 GRADE #2 = 1"74 DESIGN SPEED 45 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -579^67195198 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE `VEN> 100 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 312.54237287 CREST VERTICLE CURVE, CALL 'ATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN S. 'ED GRADE #1 = 1.74 GRADE #2 = ,500952380952 DESIGN SPEED 45 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -503^20118815 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 100 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 312^54237287 PROFILE 95+50 PI L= 0.000 L/H Pt.= 0.000 @ 0 Grade= .501% 95+50 79.130 95+75 79.255 96+00 79.380 96+25 79.506 98+50 79.631 96+75 79,756 , 97+00 79.881 97+25 80.007 97+50 80.132 97+75 80"257 78+00 80.382 98+25 80^508 98+50 80.633 98+75 80.758 99+00 80.883 99+25 81.009 79+50 81.134 81,134 99+75 81.218 81.259 100+00 81.218 81"384 100+25 81.136 81.510 100+50 80"970 81.635 100+75 80.722 81^760 199+75 PI L= 250,000 L/H Pt.= 81.228 @ 99+87.691 Grade": -2.922% 100+75 80"722 81.760 101+00 80.390 81.055 101+25 79.975 80.749 101+50 79.477 79"644 101+75 78.897 78.938 102+00 78"233 1()2+25 77.527 102+50 76.822 1()2+75 76^116 76.116 103+00 75.453 75.411 103+25 74.874 74.705 103+50 74,379 74.000 103+50 PI L= 150.000 L/H Pt.= 73"163 @ 104+84"353 Grade= -.nuO% 103+50 74^379 74^000 103+75 73.968 73.800 104+00 73.642 73.600 104+25 73"400 104+50 73.200 104+75 73^000 105+00 72.800 105+25 72.600 105+50 72"400 72,400 105+75 72.241 72"200 136+00 72.163 72"000 106+00 PI L= 100.000 L/H Pt.= 72.154 @ 106+11.538 Grade= "500% 106+00 72"163 72.000 106+25 72,166 72.125 106+50 72.250 106+75 72,375 107+00 72"500 107+25 72.425 107+50 72^750 107+75 72.875 108+00 73"000 109+25 73.125 108+50 73.250 108+75 73.375 109+00 73"500 139+50 73.750 109+75 73.875 110+00 74.000 110+25 74.125 110+50 74.250 110+75 74,375 111+00 74.500 111+25 74,625 111+50 74.750 74.750 111+75 74.844 74.875 112+00 74.875 75.000 ' 112+00 PI L= 100^000 L/H Pt.= 74.875 T 112+00 Grade= -.500I 112+00 74.875 75.000 112+25 74"844 74.875 112+50 74.750 112+75 74"625 113+00 74^500 113+25 74.375 113+50 74.250 113+75 74.125 114+00 74.000 114+25 73.875 114+50 73.750 114+75 73.625 115+00 73.500 115+25 73.375 115+50 73.250 115+75 73.125 116+00 73"000 116+25 72.875 116+50 72.750 116+75 72.625 117+00 72"500 117+25 72.375 117+50 72^250 117+75 72.125 118+00 72.000 118+25 71^875 118+50 71"750 118+75 71.625 119+00 71^500 119+25 71.375 119+50 71.250 119+75 71"125 120+00 71.000 120+25 70.875 120+50 70.750 70^750 120+75 70.656 70^625 121+00 70"625 70"500 121+00 PI L= 100"0()0 L/H Pt.= 70.625 @ 121+00 Grade= .500% 121+00 70.625 70.500 121+25 70.656 7()^625 121+50 70.750 121+75 70.875 122+00 71.000 122+25 71.125 122+50 71.250 122+75 71.375 71.375 123+00 71.519 71.500 123+00 PI L= 50.000 L/H Pt.=, 71^167 CP 121+91.667 Grade= .800% 123+00 71.519 71.500 123+25 71.700 123+50 71.900 123+75 72"100 124+00 72.300 ^� -~ '^^ 124+50 72.700 124+75 72.900 125+00 73.100 125+25 73.300 125+50 73.500 125+75 73.700 126+()0 73.900 126+25 74"100 126+50 74,300 126+75 74,500 127+00 74.700 127+25 74"900 127+50 75.100 127+75 75.300 1 t28+00 75.500 128+25 75"700 128+50 75.900 128+75 76,100 129+00 76.700 129+25 76.500 129+50 76"700 129+75 76.900 130+00 77.100 130+25 77"300 130+50 77"500 130+75 77.700 171+00 77.900 131+25 78.100 78.100 171+50 78.347 78.300 131+75 78.686 78.500 132+00 79.119 78"700 132+00 PI L= 150.000 L/H Pt.= 77.885 @ 130+71"333 Grade= 3^036% 132+00 79,119 78"700 132+25 79.645 79.459 132+50 80.265 80.218 132+75 80.977 133+00 81.736 133+25 82^495 133+50 83.254 83.254 133+75 83"973 84.013 134+00 84"614 84"772 134+25 85.174 85.531 134+50 85.656 86.290 134+50 PI L= 200.000 L/H Pt,= 86"889 @ 135+89,432 Grade= ,500% 134+50 85.656 86.290 134+75 86.05; 86.415 135+00 86.382 86.540 13 86.625 86.665 135+50 86.790 135+75 86.915 136+00 87.040 136+25 87.165 136+50 87.290 136+75 87.415 437+00 87.540 137+25 87.665 137+50 87.790 137+75 87.915 138+00 88,040 138+25 88.165 138+50 88.290 138+75 98.415 139+00 88^540 139+25 88.665 139+50 88.790 ,�"�= "" ",EV 140+00 89.040 89.010 140+25 89.134 89.165 140+50 89.165 89.290 140+50 PI L= 100.000 L/H Pt.= 89.165 @ 140+50 Grade= -.500% 140+50 89.165 89.290 140+75 89.134 89.165 141+00 89.040 141+25 88.915 141+50 88.790 141+75 88.665 142+00 88"540 142+25 88.415 142+50 88"290 142+75 88^165 143+00 89^040 143+25 87.915 143+50 87.790 143+75 87,665 144+00 97^540 144+25 87^415 144+50 87.290 87.290 144+75 87.196 87.165 145+00 87.165 37.040 145+00 PI L= 100.000 L/H Pt.= 87.165 @ 145+0,041 Grade= .479% 145+00 87,165 87,040 145+25 97"196 87.165 145+50 87.290 145+75 87.414 146+00 87.539 146+25 87"664 146+50 87^789 146+75 87^914 147+00 88"038 147+25 88"163 147+50 88"288 147+75 88^413 148+00 88.538 148+25 88.662 148+50 88^787 148+75 88.912 149+00 89.037 149+25 89.162 149+25 89.162 149+25 PI L= 0"000 L/H Pt.= 0.()00 IP 0 Grade= CREST VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE K1 = .500952380952 GRADE #2 = -2.82181818182 DESIGN SPEED 45 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) 204.351513159 LENGTH OF .VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 250 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 312.54237287 SAG VERTICLE CURVE CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = -2.82181818182' GRADE #2 = -.8 DESIGN SPEED 45 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -113^803804419 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 150 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 312.54237287 SAG VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 `- -"8 GRADE #2 = .5 DESIGN SPEED 45 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -524.06779661 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 100 GIVEN ISlARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 312.54237287 CREST VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = .5 GRADE #2 = -,5 DESIGN SPEED 45 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -772"91525426 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 100 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 312.54237287 SAG VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = -.5 GRADE #2 = .5 DESIGN SPEED 45 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -869"81355931 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 100 RIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 312.54237287 SAG VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = .5 GRADE #2 = .8 DESIGN SPEED 45 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -4354.57627109 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 50 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 312"54237287 SAG VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = .8 GRADE #2 = 3.036 DESIGN SPEED 45 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -43.027197485 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 150 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 312,54237287 CREST VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = 3"036 GRADE #2 = .5 DESIGN SPEED 45 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) 73"822916087 • LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 200 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 312"542377-` CREST VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = .5 GRADE #2 = -.5 DESIGN SPEED 45 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -772.91525426 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 100 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 312.54237287 SAG VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = -.5 GRADE 42 = .499190501889 DESIGN SPEED 45 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -870.02384689 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 100 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 312.54237287 February 18, 1987 File No. 3- 2705 -0108 Mr. Robert S. Turner County Engineer Spokane County N. 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 RE: SULLIVAN PARK CENTER SR -90 SULLIVAN ROAD INTERCHANGE DESIGN REPORT Dear Mr. Turner: Enclosed for your review and comment is one (1) copy of the draft Design Report for modifications to the Sullivan Road Interchange on SR -90. This report is being prepared in conformance with Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) require- ments. The modificatons proposed in this report are essentially those included in the Sullivan Park Center Master Plan for Development, prepared in September, 1985. We would very much appreciate your comments within the next couple of weeks. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (206)454 -3250. Very truly yours, 11SEY & HAM David H. Boyle, P. Vice President DHB /ljr Enclosure cc: Mike Teramoto, R.A. Hanson Ron Hart, WSDOT Dick Simpson Randy Hammond Offices in California, Colorado, Oregon and Washington. WIL.SEY &HAM ENGINEERING AND PLANNING SERVICES Public Improvements • Lend Development • 7Yansportation 1980 112th Avenue N.E. P.O. Box C -97304 Bellevue, Washington 98009-7730 (206) 454-3250 RECEIVED FEB .1 91987J SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ° ti,s RE: AAfilc (Affr pE / s 1 Thank, you. GSN287:sla Attachment E,. -• ,-' OYYl01S Ole COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SIDOKIAIVIE ,'%t%sumNGTON 99260 Date: Gentlemen: A review of the road, drainage, and parking plans for the above- refer- enced plat, short plat, binding site plan, and /or building permit has been accomplished. Areas of concern to us are indicated in red on the attached prints. Please make the corrections and resubmit them to this office in order that the review process may proceed. When the plans are resubmitted, mark all changes on the revised print in color. If you have any questions about this review, please contact us at 456 -3600. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Gary S. Nelson, P.E. Planning Engineer Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3600 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY (hereinafter called "Railroad "), hereby grants permission to SPOKANE COUNTY, its contractors or assigns hereinafter called "Permittee ", to enter upon its property for the purpose of: constructing a County road (Indiana Avenue No. 1507) within the former Spokane Coeur d'Alene and Palouse Railway Company (Great Northern) abandoned right of way from R. R. Station 1232+42 Westerly to the East a right of way line of Pines Road. Spokane, Washington. In consideration of permission given the Permittee by Railroad as outlined above pending cla issuance of a formal lease, permit-or v i. ' ed a ce b license, me 'erm } ee hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Railroad from and against and defend Railroad from and against any and all claims, loss, costs, suits or damages arising out of injuries to or death of any and all persons whomsoever, including, but not limited to, the parties hereto, their agents and employees, or damage to property to whomsoever belonging, including property owned by or in the care, custody and control of either Permittee or of Railroad, in any manner connected with or resulting from, either directly or indirectly, the occupancy and use of Railroad's said property by the Permittee, its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors and their employees, regardless of whether or not such injury, death or property damage may have been caused or contributed to by the negligence of the Railroad, its agents or employees. This agreement shall be and rem din in full fore and effect until such time as a formal lease, conveyane by Quitclaim Deed 15 executed by Railroad. permit or license is entered into by and between the parties hereto covering occupancy of the property of Railroad hereby permitted. The Permittee agrees to execute.such formal lease, permit or license promptly upon its being presented to it by Railroad; however, execution thereof shall not operate to absolve the Permittee of any liability assumed and incurred by it hereunder. IN WITNESS WHERE F the parties have executed this agreement in duplicate this /. day of dert--- 198_2. Witnesses: (not , David Perry Right of Way Agent - Spokane County: Form 16005 5.72 TEMPORARY AGREEMENT COVERING ADVANCE RIGHT OF ENTRY AND OCCUPANCY OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY PROPERTY BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY By tt3/4e • Reg onal Manager, Property Management • Right of Way Supervisor VI May 31, 1988 File No. 3 -2705- 0301 -05 Mr. Ross Kelley Project Management Engineer N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Sincerely, WILSEY & HAM Gene \ ., rig t, P.E. Project Manager E W W /Ijr Enclosure cc: R.A. Hanson Company Dick Simpson Carl Olson Duaine Rasmussen Randy Hammond Offices in California. Oregon and Washington. WILSKY&HAM ENGINEERING AND PLANNING SERVICES Public hn rotcments • land Ikttlopmcnt • Transportation 1980 1 f 2th Avenue N P.O. Box C-97304 Bellevue, Washington 9 )9 -7730 (206) 454 -3250 JUN u I I''ONANE CAUNI; RE: Evergreen Interchange /I -90 Corridor Study EIS Dear Mr. Kelley: As we have discussed, it is important to our client, R.A. Hanson Company, to have as much information about the Evergreen Interchange as practical included in WSDOT's I- 90 Corridor Study DEIS. The DEIS is currently being circulated for public cornrnents, and in 'behalf of our client we desire to include some information regarding the Evergreen Interchange and the traffic impacts in the area as comments to that document. In making cornrnents to the DEIS, we want to proceed in a manner which will not cause unnecessary difficulty or concern for the Department of Transportation or Spokane County. It also seems that some coordination between our comments and the County's may be appropriate. For that reason 1 am sending the enclosed copies of our preliminary ideas of what would be included in those comments. 1 am sending them also to Ron Anderso:l at WSDOT. Please review the comments at your earliest convenience. After you have made your review, we would very much like to discuss them with you prior to making any formal submittal. Please understand that the enclosures are not formal comments on the DEIS, but only drafts for your review and suggestions. I will be out of town from June 1 -7. If I do not hear from you before that time, I will contact you imrnediately upon my return. May 31, 1988 File No. 3 -2705- 0301 -05 Mr. Ron Anderson Washington State Department of Transportation N. 2714 Mayfair Street Spokane, Washington 99207 Dear Mr. Anderson: As we have discussed, it is important to our client, R.A. Hanson Company, to have as much information as practical about the Evergreen Interchange included in the I -90 Corridor Study DEIS. The DEIS is currently being circulated for public comments, and in behalf of our client we desire to include some information regarding the Evergreen Interchange and the traffic impacts in the area as comments to that document. In making comments to the DEIS, we want to proceed in a manner which will not cause unnecessary difficulty or concern for the Department of Transportation or Spokane County. For that reason I am sending the enclosed copies of our preliminary ideas of what would be included in those comments. 1 am sending them also to Ross Kelley at Spokane County. Please review these comments at your earliest convenience. After you have made your review, we would very much like to discuss them with you prior to making any formal submittal. Please understand that the enclosures are not formal comments on the DEIS, but only drafts for your review and suggestions. I will be out of town from June 1 -7. If I do not hear from you before that time, I will contact you immediately upon my return. Sincerely, WILSEY & HAM Gene W. P.E. Project Manager EWW /ljr Enclosure cc: R.A. Hanson Company Ross Kelley Dick Simpson Carl Olson Duaine Rasmussen Randy Hammond Offices in California, Oregon and Washington. WI EY & H M ENGINEERING AND PLANNING SERVICES Public Impro.cntcnts • Land Development • 7}ansportntinn 1980 112th Avenue N.E. P.O. Box C -97304 Bellevue, Washington 98009 -7730 (206) 454 RE: Evergreen Interchange /I -90 Corridor Study EIS May 31, 1988 File No. 3 -2705- 0301 -05 Mr. M. W. Tranum District Administrator Washington State Department of Transportation North 2714 Mayfair Street P.O. Box 5299 North Central Station Spokane, Washington 99205 -0299 RE: I -90 CORRIDOR STUDY EIS Dear Mr. Tranum: DRAFT We appreciate the opportunity to review the DEIS for improvements to I -90 in Spokane. With the continued growth of the Spokane area, it is imperative that roadway infrastructure needs to be considered in a long -range planning context as represented by this DEIS. We commend WSDOT for their foresight and leadership in anticipating future needs and addressing the difficult issues related to freeway rehabilitation in urban areas. Implementation of these improvements will assure mobility for our citizens and produce economic benefits throughout the Inland Empire region. Our involvement with the 1 -90 project concerns access to our land in the vicinity of the existing Sullivan and Pines Road interchanges. A master plan for the Sullivan Park Center was developed during 1984 -1986, and was accompanied by extensive environ- mental impact reviews. A program of phased roadway improvements, coordinated with phases of project development, was prepared with the participation of WSDOT and Spokane County. The early phases of the Sullivan Park Center are designed to be served with from the Sullivan Road interchange, combined with an extension of Indiana Avenue. In the final phase, a new interchange would be developed on 1 -90 between Sullivan and Pines roads, designated as the Evergreen Interchange in the DEIS. The primary reason for the Evergreen Interchange is its role in relieving future congestion at the Sullivan Road interchange. The Evergreen interchange would reduce traffic volumes on the Sullivan ramps and at the proposed Sullivan /Indiana intersection. In this regard, it appears the DEIS has not addressed traffic volumes on the major arterials which interchange with 1 -90. This information would provide a sense of the need and justification for additional interchanges or interchange modifications where they are proposed. We have prepared updated traffic projections for use in a design study of the Evergreen interchange that is currently underway. These figures show future traffic volumes on the arterial system with and without the Evergreen interchange at full buildout of the Sullivan Park Center. We feel this information is critical to evaluating the Evergreen interchange proposal. DRAFT Mr. M. W. Tranum May 31, 1988 Page Two Several other points of clarification about the Evergreen interchange proposal also are relevant to the EIS: 1. Various design alternatives are under consideration. The stated impacts in the DEIS represent worst -case conditions with a full diamond interchange. 2. The interchange may include a connection with the existing Evergreen Road south of Mission Avenue. If this connection is included, traffic volumes may increase in the residential areas along Evergreen Road to the south. 3. The interchanges may be constructed in phases to provide early mitigation of the traffic impacts of the Sullivan Park Center, with other improvements to be made as growth in the area dictates additional improvement needs. 4. Concepts which have been evaluated include numerous configurations and locations of the proposed interchange. Most have been rejected for reasons of safety, lack of flexibility for future improvements, or impact on adjacent properties. We have included conceptual drawings of the two alternatives which appear at this time to be most reasonable. We are proposing that the first phase of either of these alternatives would be constructed when required by the developer of Sullivan Park Center, and future phases, when required by growth of the general area, by the appropriate public agencies. All improvements in the first phase would be made in such a manner as to be easily expanded for future growth. Alternative A would probably require relocation of the_ existing water tower with extension of the road up the hill to connect to Evergreen Road. The road extension will probably not require any disturbance of the existing wells. Alternative B would not require disturbing of the wells or water tower, but would require sharp corners at the south connection to Evergreen Road or acquisition of some additional existing homes. Our preliminary review indicates that Alternative A is probably the preferable alternative. If we can provide additional information please call us immediately. Sincerely, WILSEY b: HAM Gene W. Wright, P.E. Project Manager EWW /ljr Enclosures cc: R.A. Hanson Company Ross Kelley Dick Simpson Carl Olson Duaine Rasmussen Randy Hammond WITHOUT EVERGREEN INTERCHANGE Evergreen 9700 WITH EVERGREEN INTERCHANGE PHASE I Evergreen EVERGREEN INTERCHANGE PHASE II Evergreen 24000 28700 9100 I -90 1 -90 1 -90 1-90 Indiana 34200 53100 I ndiana . Indiana EVERGREEN INTERCHANGE & SOUTH CONNECTION Indiana 44100 Mission 67500 ' c 44100 • m Mission 34200 57800 44100 Mission 34200 43500 35000 a Mission SULLIVAN & EVERGREEN INTERCHANGES YEAR 2000 ADT TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS May, 1988 34200 38800 -4. May 31, 1988 File No. 3 -2705- 0301 -05 Mr. Ron Anderson Washington State Department of Transportation N. 2714 Mayfair Street Spokane, Washington 99207 RE: EVERGREEN INTERCHANGE DESIGN ALTERNATIVES Dear Mr. Anderson: We have previously discussed the issue of connecting the proposed Evergreen Interchange to Evergreen Road above the bluff. Both you and Spokane County have expressed a desire that an eventual connection to Evergreen Road be made, or at least that the option for such a connection not be eliminated. In our last conversation you indicated some cost - sharing by WSDOT on that extension above the hill may be appropriate. That extension does not directly mitigate the traffic impacts caused by the Sullivan Park Center, such mitigation being the prime motivation for requiring the Evergreen lnterchange. You also indicated, and as we all well know, state funding may be difficult to obtain for cost - sharing on such a project. The need for the interconnection to Evergreen Road, the need for a bridge across 1 -90 wide enough to accommodate that traffic, and the on /off ramps to the east are improvements which may not be needed for many years, and are of little direct benefit to the Sullivan Park Center. On the other hand, it will probably be difficult to gain FHWA approval on anything that appears to serve only the Sullivan Park Center. Considering these facts, it appears logical to perform conceptual layouts, design report and right -of -way acquisition for a full diamond interchange, but to phase construction of the interchange. The Sullivan Park developer would construct the first phase consisting of a two lane bridge, the on /off ramps to the west, and the connection north to Indiana. The need to design the bridge to connect to Evergreen would require that it be sloped to accommodate the desired 696 grade up the bluff to Evergreen Road. The design and construction would be done in a manner to accommodate the later expansion of the bridge and connection to Evergreen Road by the state and /or county. That expansion would take place as traffic needs warranted the additional capacity. Offices in California. Oregon and Washington. WILS & HAM ENGINEERING AND PLANNING SERVICES Public Impnnements • Land Lktcbpntcnt • 71ertsportmion 1980 112th Avenue N.E. P.O. Box C -97304 Bellevue. Washington 98009 -7730 (206) 454 -3250 Mr. Ron Anderson May 31, 1987 Page Two The later phases of construction would widen the bridge, construct the connection to Evergreen Road and construct the eastern ramps. Proceeding in this manner would end the need to worry about cost - sharing in the initial construction of the bridge, and would hopefully meet the concerns of FHWA that the interchange is intended as a benefit to the entire area, not just a single user. Your review of this suggestion would be appreciated. I will call you during the week of June 6th to discuss it with you. Sincerely, WILSEY & HAM Gene W. Wright, P.E. Project Manager EWW /ljr cc: Raymond Hanson Carl Olson Duaine Rasmussen Randy Hammond Dick Simpson Randy Hammond r SR 90 Indiana Ave. Pro osed 9 11 21 -,I E', 0 r el Wells •i Mission Ave. EVERGREEN RD. INTERCHANGE ALTERNATE B ULTIMATE ALIGNMENT Watertank 1 r �1 i 9 '1 , 1 : V II 1, d' rn w 1 ; SULLIVAN PARK CENTER — t 1 11 1 • 1 — t • r .eeati «rv. ns wr �l a' + vicyt+v . ittnfe aow Indiana Ave. Pro• ose Mission Ave. EVERGREEN RD. INTERCHANGE ALTERNATE A ULTIMATE ALIGNMENT 91, cc .1 U 1 1 Eli III �I I — 1 _ -I 1 w Water tank If I WcIIsI •I SULLIVAN PARK CENTER I I = II — — — 11 — _— 1:311 11 ¢,I 11 1; - VI I I I I 111 11 1 1 1 1 _ - j 1- l 1 1 NOV 15 '89 08:32 ' SIMPSON ENG. L 2/- © pry G--o Vii 6 k 7\ 118 P01 cikt giv L 71)9; kt "A k € & 5 IN is FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION Founded 1948 wimpson Engineers, Inc. Civil Engineering, Land Surveying & Land Planning Date o ,` 15 - 8 1 Time is 3b No of pages Cates + 2 To From . tNtY Net.SON Vc,ce.. PN «. Fs . Clarence E Simpson Engineers, Inc. _ N 909 Argonne Road Spokane WA 99212 -2789 Fax (509) 926 -1322 (509) 926 -1323 NOV 15 '89 08:32 ' SIMPSON ENG. L 2/- © pry G--o Vii 6 k 7\ 118 P01 cikt giv L 71)9; kt "A k € & 5 IN is NAME STATION ON ROADWAY TYPE : RA. HANSOM INDIANA AVE. 98 - Rt. • C - 1 - 2' R.A HANSON INDIANA AVE I0-3 t15 IR'. C- I -2 s 11 11 1 k 1Lev 90.3 1\ z ` s� A.P INDIANA AVE. 100 +0000 9 PO.T. SR 51 +60.39 �FY1 PC. I / .7 35 DESIGN SPEED (MPH) CURRENT ADT FOR 1986 NA r 47060 ( PROJECTED ADT FOR DESIGN YEAR 2000 PROJECTED DHV FOR DESIGN YEAR 2000 DERECTIONAL PERCENTAGE (D) PERCENT OF TRUCKS PER DHV Cr) DHV PERCENT OF ADT (K) 4345 61 6 42 415 4 7 5 s 4+7 44 PC. E-NS 4 +84.61 , 2' BEGIN E -NS' RAMP POT E -NS 1 6 +27.05 PO.C. INDIANA AVE. 106+00.77 o TURNBACK LINE 9.5 t 45'R 2 c ` e LL : F!!!!!!!!!:: a . 42 ` I sp. �►.., co 100 +95.45 F us 3 TO BE DEDICATED 105 +62}3 %Tr AS R IGHT -OF -WAY ,, F 1 ; P .C. E -NS' RAMP 6x83.64 30 m � E6 -pit A l '� ��7 rrin TT o 0 e (1 t A itstit = 1 P I. E -NS' RAMP 9+03.49 z I� 0 15 :17APE — = t om 1 ' n a / ° PI. E -NS 6 +78.80 28550 2860 57 10 \ \ „,,,,;$,,,\ E -NS' x+03.49 Indinnn Ave 107 +63.00 NS-W' 14 +58.33 NS -W' II 76.52 72'42 30 Lt - 57 Rt 23'36'25. Rt 94 °38 31.4 Lt. P.I. INDIANA AVE. I07+6,300 ACCESS APPROACH SCHEDULE' P.T. E -NS' 10 +85.69 ssetk X 34 / END E -NS' RAMP P.O.T. E-NS 11 +56.84 d> >JE -NS` II +54.44, 21`LT. 1' f P T... 10+47 27 • ACCES. n ' SCALE MwNE OFFICE of SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER N. 821 JEFFERSON ST. SPOKANE • S. 99280 APPROVED: PHASE 2 INDIANA AVENUE , SHEET Ear 5 aav r APPROVED• , a x -�g 1CHE . DAZE COUNTY 112.411111121 Z O 0T 0T • • NOTE r r SLIEWALX KY EASEMENT AMY SWALE * THIS IS THE MINIMUM WIDTH REQUIRED. WIDTH MAY VARY TO FIT DRAINAGE AND LAND— SCAPE PLAN TO THE TOPO— GRAPHY OF THE SITE. 14 TRAFFIC 12' TRAFFIC 5. N» 76 8' 7 14' TRAFFIC R/W Y PHASE 2 INDIANA AVENUE SULLIVAN ROAD EAST TO TERMINUS TO OWNERSHIP LINE 416• EASEMENT .1a SWALE 6' set XSEC14.OW6 .r. 1 . Spokane APPROVED AS TO FO : RW -1/87 rosecut • AA 8711200255- AGREEMENT � .4 1987, by and between'., TT corporation em eIp( tt,.'dated this. /7 day of Washington corp UNIVERS �1 a „ f itself, its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, hereinafter called the "DEVELOPER," and SPOKANE COUNTY, municipal corporation in the State of Washington, for the purpose of improving the' intersection of Sprague Avenue and Gillis Road by installation of traffic signal system and appurtenant•channelization and roadway improvements, which improvements .are.for the .purpose of enhancing access to Developer's property under, the following mutually agreed conditions, to wit ) County agrees to perform the To prepare plans, specifications and estimate of cost for for Bids from private contractors to accomplish said work. To enter into a:.contract'with the'contractor submitting the lowest and'best bid, "subject to,the;approval of the Developer, and the deposit by the Developer.of the contract amount, including signal equipment, plus 20% for construction engi- neering,.inapection and contingencies with Spokane County. To pay the contractor amounts due following: as the work is accomplished. To deduct from the Developer's deposit the total costs and expenses of the pro ject upon the completion thereof, including engineering, administration and associated costs. To refund any balance of the Developer's deposit in excess of the total cost and: expense of the improvement, or To bill the Developer for the costs and and expenses of the project which exceed.: the deposit amount, if any. . Upon 'completion;of:the . work•to eccept. the same as part of the County .rroad sysfem q and assume maintenance responsibility therefor. The Developer agrees as follows: 1 I To. deposit the amount of Eight Thousand and No /100 Dollars' 08,000.00) with Spokane County at the time of execution of this Agreement to initiate prelimin —::', ary engineering for the project. 2 After bid opening by the County, but prior to award of the contract, to promptly.' deposit the contract amount, including signal equipment, plus twenty percent (20%) for construction engineering, inspection, contingencies, and associated costs with Spokane County. 3 To pay promptly to the County, as billed, for any and all costs of the project which exceed the deposit amounts. THE PARTIES are here agreed that this is the whole and complete statement `of.!„ their agreement. APPROVED ounty Engineer Title. Bus.Address: . DEVELOPER: UNIVERSITY CTTY.lTNC..a ... Washington co poration ....a.semI dr 6.2 44.4C SPOKANE COUNTY Bv: 938 Pi;CE 5 • the project and Call,;,`; .4 , t ..._aft ti; pI 5t . ey tha,k: Hw 3:ftt1 Nov 10 3 41 Pi '8i 411ak k! r.. rOM UE ['S MOST. ice! sit trf:SN.; vt4/ ` � �IITY r. yr t t C rman of the Boa d of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington ii r • 1( N IN SPII I MAN (;over nor Dear Mr. Hammond: SIAIE OI WASHINGIUN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Transportation [trailing • Olympi r, Washington 98504 • (206) 753 -6005 • Mr. H. R. Hammond Transportation Engineer Wilsie and Ham P. 0. Box C -97304 Bellevue, Washington 98009 June 21, 1984 Re: SR 90 Sullivan Park Center Traffic Impact Analysis and Design Study Thank you for your letter of March 9, 1984', which provided a copy of the "Traffic Impact Analysis and Design Study" report concerning the above- referenced project. It has been a pleasure working with you through the numerous meetings and other discussions which have resulted in this report. I)lirANr 111 NI'11 SI IN . q,.. RECEIVED JUN 2 SPOKAN COUNTY ENGINEER The report includes considerable detailed information relative to traffic projections and resultant levels of service from both background traffic and traffic anticipated as a result of development of the proposed shopping center. We have reviewed this material and in general concur with your traffic projections and analysis The report includes general design details for several features which are necessary to maintain the minimum desired Level of Service "D" for traffic operations. The design features and Levels of Service calculations are generally considered acceptable as presented in the report. The report concludes that traffic generated by the initial phase of development of the shopping center can adequately be accommodated with the current WSDOT design for an upgraded diamond interchange at Sullivan Road. To maintain satisfactory traffic operations would however require the construction of access ramps between Indiana Avenue and the westbound off- and on -ramps of I -90. These access connections would parallel Sullivan Road both on the east and the west. These Mr. H. R. Hammond June 21, 1984 Page 2 connections are not a. part of the WSDOT updated plan. Therefore, construction funding will not be provided by WSDOT and is the responsibility of .others. The acceptability of this plan is based on the initial phase of development of the shopping center being limited to approx- imately 650,000 square feet of gross feasible area. Any •expan- sion beyond that level of development for the first phase would not be acceptable to the Department without additional access and capacity provisions. The report also draws conclusions relative to access needs for the ultimate development of the shopping center and peripheral. area. We concur with the finding that to adequately serve the full development will require an additional access to the area from Interstate 90. Without such an access, Sullivan Road and possibly other interchanges in the area will breakdown • and, thus not be able to provide the appropriate level of service to the traveler. WSDOT concurrence with development beyond the first stage would require commitment to providing. an additional access point to service the area. We have appreciated the cooperative attitude of you and your staff. We appreciate the opportunity to review the.final report and have no comments or recommendations for modifications in it. We will be pleased to continue working with you on plans to adequately serve the public as the development con- tinues through additional stages. If you have any questions or wish to discuss any of this material further, please feel free to contact me or Ron Hart, in our District 6 office in Spokane. SAM:tw cc: A, D. Andreas Ron Hart Gary Kennal9, Spokane Cty. Raymond Hanson Si.ncerely, S. A. MOON, P.E. Location- Design Engineer LSEY& HAM 1980 112 h lye. N.E /P.O. Box C -9 - 304 Bellevue, AAA 98009 (206) 454 -3250 March 9, 1984 File No. 3- 2572 -0101 Mr. Stanley Moon Project Development Office 2C11 Transportation Administration Building Olympia, Washington 98504 RE: SULLIVAN PARK CENTER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON Dear Mr. Moon: I have enclosed a copy of the Traffic Impact Analysis and Design Study Report, including drawings and technical appendices, for the above re- ferenced project. This report addresses the capacity and design issues raised by WSDOT and Spokane County, and incorporates comments received from both agencies. The coordination process included a series of meet- ings and workshops, beginning in September, 1983. With respect to WSDOT's program in the project area, the traffic report reflects a revised development phasing which limits impacts on the proposed I -90 /Sullivan interchange. Satisfactory traffic operations can be maintained with the current WSDOT design for an upgraded diamond interchange. Only minor modifications will be required when the Sullivan Park Center is constructed. Offices located in: Bellevue, Washington • Portland, Oregon • Foster City and Fresno, California Coo•.rc'/ CoP%1. At this time, there is no plan to relocate the railroad corridor before completion of the new interchange in late 1985. The WSDOT design cor- rectly includes rail crossing gates on Sullivan Road at the current location. As noted on the site plan, the rail line would be abandoned or relocated north of the proposed Indiana Avenue extension. In addition, there does not appear to be a need to revise the crossing gate positions in the WSDOT design, since the crossing location would be changed in advance of any widening of Sullivan Road. As development planning proceeds and the status of the railroad becomes clearer, Mr. Hanson will coordinate with WSDOT and Spokane County. There is less certainty regarding the long -term traffic planning in the proximity of the site. The focus of the traffic analysis was on the I- 90 /Sullivan interchange. It was determined that the proposed WSDOT design can function satisfactorily, with full development of the site, through the year 2000, when combined with a new I -90 interchange to the west. However, there remain a number of design alternatives for I -90. access, each of which would generate different traffic flow patterns. These design issues will be the subject of a future I -90 corridor study. public improvements engineering /development services/public policy planning and analysis/environmen [ al affairs /surveying 'lull Free Numbers Everett 353 -8837 Tacoma 475 -6880 s n' Mr. Stanley Moon Page 'March 9, 1984 The enclosed material summarizes the findings of the impact analysis and design studies which have been conducted. Please review this informa- tion and return any comments to me. We appreciate the opportunity to have been involved in the planning of this important WSDOT interchange project. Very truly yours, WILSEY & HAM HRH /ljr /B -43 Enclosure H.R. (Randy) Hammond, P.E. Transportation Engineer cc: Mr. Ron Hart Mr. Gary Kennaly Mr. Raymond Hanson i Dyn5L= T or assigns. COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7. f w t. r2.t..ttt' c o PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER IN REFERENCE TO THE ATTACHED FINDINGS 8 ORDER, THE HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE ADOPTS THE FOLLOWING PLANNING REPORT CONDITIONS OF AP ATTACHED HERETO: 1. That the below listed conditions of all Departments and Agencies are binding upon the applicant, owner(s) of the property, heirs, successors 2 The preliminary plat of record approval is for the property legally described in the application for this proposal. 3. That the final plat(s) or phases be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record as legally described and advertised. However, the Subdivision Administrator may grant administrative approvals for divisions of land as provided by State law or local ordinance provided such divisions are consistent with the concept plan 4. The Spokane County Subdivision Administrator shall review any proposed Final Plat to insure compliance with the Findings and Conditions of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. ckll final plats shall illustrate the 200 ft. setback from the ordinary high water mark pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act 5. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for three (3) years to November 1, 19195..51The applicant may request an Extension of Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 6. Upon filing the Final Plat the zone change of the Final Plat area shall be finalized and the existing Agricultural and Restricted Industrial zone classifications shall be in accordance with the zoning concept plan. Prior to finalization of any part of the project, the existing Burlington Northern railroad lines through the western portion of the property will be either acquired and abandoned or relocated to the north of Indiana Avenue along the riparian park on the preliminary plat. The applicant shall submit evidence that any structures located within the development are compatible with easement rights of any grantees of record, i.e., transmission lines prior to building permit release. Prior to the finalization of Phase I, the general area shown as the riparian park shall be owned and maintained as a passive park by the Property Owners Association to be formed by the purchasers of lots within the project. Specific conditions, covenants and restrictions relating to maintenance and use of the park shall be reviewed and approved by the. Spokane County Zoning Administrator and filed with the Spokane County Auditor. Nothing within this condition shall prohibit the sponsor or subsequent owners from reaching agreements for the use or transfer of the arian .ark to Spokane Count . It is the intention of this condi to rovi.e for regular main pub is ena e passive par ain it for 1 2 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) Planning Department ( Cont'd) :10'1 That the planting and maintenance of the limited access areas shown as Open pace'at the Sullivan Road /I -90 interchange anti soutn of Indiana i shill `be provided by applicant or successors consistent with road an scaping pokane County and the State of Washington. 11. The open space plantings and maintenance at the proposed Evergreen interchange shall be provided by the applicant or successor at the time the interchange is established. I•l1 2•:, The boulevard treatment landscaping for Indiana will be established or provided for as part of Phase I finalization by the applicant or _. successors. 13. That a Final Plat name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. (14). That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat, for distribution to the County Planning Department, Utilities Department, Engineering Department, Health District and applicable utility companies. (WrittiiCapproval of. said_uti,lityr easements_ Ebyi•sai.d ut13j tyycompani es: must f9N C l- W C fi tat- r 6E PN0 o. r:n4L PL4t. hss7 DOA So rrwt NEE 15. That a current certificate of title be furnished the County Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 16. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements unless the applicant(s) /sponsor(s) choose to file a ')°' notarized Waiver of Notice of Action with the Spokane County Planning Department. 17. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall . be submitted with a performance bond for lots to be developed prior to release of building permits. 18. That a plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection be approved by the water supplier, fire protection district, Spokane County Building It Safety Department and County health authorities. The agencies will certify on the WATER PLAN, prior to the filing of the final plat or any phase of the preliminary plat that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The WATER PLAN and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. C' INe^4NJ S HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) Planning Department (Cont'd) The purveyor will also certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved WATER PLAN. The time schedule will provide-for of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. �� , . v •.�,Sch The plat sponsor shall also sign the WATER PLAN to confirm the contractual arrangements or agreements. The final plat dedication will contain the following statement: "the public water system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building & Safety Department, and water purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 19. That no occupancy permit will be issued for any lot within the Final Plat until certified by a Washington State licensed engineer "that the water system has been installed pursuant the approved WATER PLAN for the Final Plat ", signed and stamped by said engineer. The certification may be in the form of a letter but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the WATER PLAN as a schematic map showing the "As Built" water system. 20. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. Or p.,c:. p 4[ f;. _ ( -c F i 21. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the 1986 Spokane County Zoning Code. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 22. All mitigating measures set forth in the Final EIS be complied with and has been agreed to by the applicant. 23. That the project is subject to the Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone of the Spokane County Ordinance, which sets forth various measures for Aquifer protection; specifically, measures dealing with wastewater disposal, spill protection measures and stormwater runoff. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 1 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) j 24. The applicant shall provide sight- obscuring cyclone fencing 6 ft. in height along the southerly borders of Lots 1 through 9 of the preliminary plat and along the westerly edge of Lots 10 and 11 which adjoin properties not within the development. Additionally, the applicant shall provide a 6 ft. sight- obscuring fence along Lot 27 in the area which has been indicated by the applicant in a site plan amendment to be dedicated as non - developable. This area is approximately 500 ft. wide extending westerly of Flora Road. COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT ;i1S1.1( 1 &'( rii That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to dedication of G N Right -of -Way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. G P � � c0' u LI, That plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3.� That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. ,4:- That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. L ,16, -GL 5. That appropriate provisions be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1 -ft. strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the final plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) L,,N& 6. A statement must appear in the dedicatory language of the final plat: "that individual driveway access permits be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system." LAnCU, °- 7. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to Sullivan Road. 8. That all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. '• t HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) 5;j"1a \`I-0lsi> County Engineer Department ( Cont'd) y.D�� 9. That the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a_design proposal acceptable to therState Highway Depaartmen Hof the proposed State Sway-County Road intersection. State Hi hway De aarrtmenta rov of L the proposed design must be received..priorr the fi 1n1 of the final p lat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the responsibility of the sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. This shall include both Phase I and Phase II designs. That the applicant shall coordinate i Sp ne County Parks and Recreation Departme the _.onty Engineer's Department to provide a bicycle pathway through t n• - portion of the project paralleling ( the Spokane River. Thiathway wou ovided in lieu of bicycle � rl � lanes along the posed arterial streets. Feu "" ,, 1 z` "� Tha cess to Evergreen Road from parcels 12, 15, 16 and 17 is � V v 3) ohibited. r w rt&-o J 12. That the applicant shall submit to the County Engineer an intersection plan for the Evergreen -local access road located south of Indiana. A 13. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which established regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 14. That prior to finalization of the proposed plat, the applicant shall submit to the County Engineer for review and approval "Typical" Roadway Cross Sections for the following proposed roadways: a. Indiana Avenue Sullivan to the proposed Evergreen intersection. b. Indiana Avenue from the proposed Evergreen intersection to the connection with the existing Indiana Avenue at the west end of the proposal. c. Evergreen Road south of Indiana Avenue, between Indiana and the proposed Evergreen interchange. d. Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus. 15. The typical roadway cross section for the roadway which connects the proposed Evergreen Road with the proposed Indiana Avenue in the westerly portion of the plat shall be typical roadway section No. 1 access standard. 16. That the typical roadway cross section for the cul -de -sac which is proposed east of Sullivan Road and extends southeasterly from Indiana Avenue shall be typical roadway section No. 1 access standard. 1) , HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 17. That prior to recording of the final plat, the Burlington Northern Railroad line which runs through portions of the proposal on both the east and west sides of Sullivan Road, shall be abandoned or relocated. Prior to release of a building permit for those portions of the proposal identified as Phase I, the applicant shall: 1 ( .•'4 • , '�18. Obtain permits for roadway construction from the appropriate state and county agencies (Spokane County Engineer). 19. Improve the Sullivan Road Intersection in a manner consistent with the approved plans and as set forth in the supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. 20 Construct those roadways which are identified in the supplemental Environmental Impact Statement as being necessary in order to accommodate traffic volumes which will be generated by Phase I. Construction shall be in conformance with the approved roadway plans and typical roadway cross- sections. Roadway construction must be completed prior to the re �{` permits or a bond in the amount_es_timated by the County Engineer to cover \,\ the cost of construction improvements, construction certification as- built" plans, and monumenting the street centerline shall be filed with the County Engineer. 12J F Ri�µy Construct a connection to the existing Indiana Avenue which is located to the south and west of the westerly boundary of the proposed plat. It shall be theapplicant's responsibility to obtain the necessary right -of -way alignment for this connection. This connection must provide for a smooth transition between the existing Indiana Avenue and that which is proposed within the plat. The transition alignment shall be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer. The County Engineer will provide assistance during right -of -way negotiations should it be ��ecessarV 22. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as- built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 23. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal pla for the proposed building site prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 D PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department ( Cont'd) 24. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan for proposed building sites shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stallt shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing, as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. 25. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 26. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 27. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 28. Should the Phase 1 development include those portions of the property lying east of Sullivan Road, the applicant will be required to construct the Sullivan Road improvement and interchange modifications which are scheduled for construction in order to accommodate Phase II of the proposal. 29. That Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road shall be constructed per the approved plans and typical roadway cross - section if properties east of Sullivan Road are included in Phase I. 30. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to function as a private road providing that the roadway is constructed in accordance with Spokane County public road standards and in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross- section. 31. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County road right -of -way from the County Engineer. No work will,be performed within the County road right -of -way without a permit. 32. If Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This document provides the following: n HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County, Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Section 3.07, Sections A & B of that title. 33. The traffic generated by the proposed project will have a significant impact upon Sullivan Road between Interstate 90 and Sprague Avenue. It is anticipated that a two -way left turn lane will be needed to accommodate turning movements along the Sprague to I -90 corridor. This left turn lane will be required prior to the construction of Phase 1I. Prior to the commencement of Phase III, it will be necessary to improve Sullivan Road to a seven lane facility. The proposed Design Report for the Evergreen Interchange shall also include a review of traffic conditions along the Sullivan Road /I -90 corridor. The above specified roadway improvements shall be considered within that analysis. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to pay for the costs of right -of -way acquisition and roadway improvements along Sullivan between I -90 and Sprague for Phase II. Should other land development occur along the Sprague /I -90 Corridor which has measurable traffic impacts (i.e. large commercial or industrial uses) then a formula for participation in the sharing of costs for roadway improvements will be developed by the County Engineer. The formula will consider the traffic volumes generated by Sullivan Park Center as well as other identified traffic generators. For the Phase III improvements, a formula for the assessment of costs will be developed by the County Engineer in cooperation with the applicant. Of principal consideration in the development of the formula will be the traffic volumes generated by this project, traffic generated by other projects and other traffic utilizing the roadway. 34. That prior to the initiation of Phase II of the proposed development, the applicant will conduct an updated traffic study. This study may be included within the design report which will be prepared for the Evergreen Road Interchange. The Design Report shall also consider the impacts upon the County Road System of the extension of a connection to Mission Avenue from the proposed Evergreen Interchange. This analysis shall include potential traffic impacts upon Evergreen Road between Sprague Avenue and the connection. VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER County Engineer Department - (Cont'd) 7771 p lfiS-ir j PNASEIL Roadway construction and improvements for Phase II of the proposal shall be consistent with the improvements which have been identified within the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. Those improvements are as follows: 35. Construction and upgrading of the Sullivan Road - Indiana intersection in a manner consistent with the plans which have been improved by the Spokane County Engineer and the State of Washington Department of Transportation. 36. Construction of new freeway interchange at or near the alignment of Evergreen Road as identified within the Supplemental EIS. 37. Construction of Evergreen Road from Indiana Avenue southward to the proposed freeway interchange. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. 38. Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed Evergreen Road) shall be improved to a five -lane facility from Evergreen Road westerly to the connection with the existing Indiana Avenue. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross- section. That Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed plat) must be widened to provide additional traffic lanes in order to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. A five lane facility is required to mitigate the traffic impacts upon Indiana Avenue and adjoining business properties. A plan for the upgrade of the intersection at Pines and Indiana must be submitted to the County Engineer as specified in condition #9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to secure the additional right -of -way for the improvement of Indiana Avenue. 39. Indiana Avenue (east of Sullivan Road) shall be constructed as a five -lane facility from Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus of the project. Indiana shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. 40. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to function as a private road, providing that the roadway is constructed in accordnace with Spokane County Public Road Standards in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross - section. 41. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County road right -of -way from the County Engineer. No work will be performed within the County road right -of -way without a permit. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department ( Cont'd) 42. If Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This document provides the following: That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road Improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Section 3.07, Sections A and B of that title. 43. Should the Evergreen Interchange Design Report determine that the level of improvements as specified within the Suplemental EIS are not necessary for Phase II, then the County Engineer may approve a phased plan for roadway construction or design deviations for Phase II roadway improvements. 44. That a public road Right -of -Way connection shall be provided to properties which are located to the south and east of Parcels #27 and #28 as depicted on the preliminary plat. This will require a redesign of the plat in this area. PHASE III 45. The roadway improvements for Phase III identified within the Supplemental EIS are the connection from the new freeway interchange at Evergreen Road southward to Mission Avenue_andLtbmpo Bible connections northward and eastward of the prop_osalr `The need for these improvemen w iTT - be C addressed_ i_ n _the_development_of_the_Evergreen Interchange Design Report. The level of improvements, assignment of financial responsibility for improvements and timing of construction will be determined on the basis of traffic volumes, location of facilities and traffic safety related issues. 46. Phase I1I improvements as identified by the Design Report shall be constructed prior to the commencement of Phase III construction. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER J CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Health District (COnt'd) 2. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage system shall not be authorized." 3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social & Health Services. 4. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 5. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Connection to the Valley sewer system is to be made prior to release of occupancy permits for any structures within the site. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1. That the applicant obtain necessary approval from the Department of Transportation for each phase of the project prior to finalization. 2. That the applicant submit proof to the Planning Department file that Washington State Department of Transportation conditions have been satisfactorily handled prior to finalization of any portion of the preliminary plat. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) WASHINGTON STATE OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION 1. In the event that archaeological or historic resources are discovered during project activities, the applicant or successor shall notify the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation in Olympia, Washington. /'J Date Chairperson WAGE RATES This is a privately funded project and is exempt from state and federal prevailing wage rates. WORK FOR PROPERTY Seven Bays Estates, Inc. owns 'a number of platted lots and is interested in entertaining offers to trade a portion of contractor's construction costs toward lot acquisition. DATE OF OPENING BIDS Sealed bids will be received at the Engineer's office at N. 909 Argonne Road, Spokane, WA 99212 until 4:00 p.m. on Friday, June 2, 1989. The bids will then be opened and publicly read aloud. This project is 100% privately funded and award is not bound by the rules that apply to use of public funds. Bids are requested to assure the owner of a competitive price. It is expected that the award will be given to one of the lower bidders. The contractor does not need to show credit for land to be given con- sideration, although credit for land may influence the award. AWARD OF CONTRACT The award of the contract will be made on Monday, June 5, 1989. TIME FOR COMMPLETION The work on this project shall be completed within 40 calendar days of notice to proceed. Time extensions will be granted for delays caused by others, Northwest Lining or Al Janke. BID BOND A bid bond equal to five percent of the total bid amount shall accompany each bid proposal. PERFORMANCE BOND Upon award of the contract the contractor shall provide .a performance and guarantee bond equal to one hundred percent [100%] of the total amount of the bid. 3 m ;•-• 7Z.Z • C A?Al•-rtmot-40?-jt?„1 N w 1 V 4 E it V. 1.4 6. L CLIW LNE .rEz7e.,,e VAVe-7 71 Tr: lei* 1s t , A0 7/ WAGE RATES BID BOND a`N This is a privately funded project and is exempt from state and federal prevailing wage rates. WORK FOR PROPERTY Seven Bays Estates, Inc. owns a number of platted lots and is interested in entertaining offers to trade a portion of contractor's construction costs toward lot acquisition. DATE OF OPENING BIDS Sealed bids will be received at the Engineer's office at N. 909 Argonne Road, Spokane, WA 99212 until 4:00 p.m. on Friday, June 2, 1989. The bids' will then be opened and publicly read aloud. - This project is 100% privately funded and award is not bound by the rules that apply to use of public funds. Bids are requested to assure the owner of a competitive price. It is expected that the award will be given to one of the lower bidders. The contractor does not need to show credit for land to be given con- sideration, although credit for land may influence the award. AWARD OF CONTRACT The award of the contract will be made on Monday, June 5, 1989. %4 V- oct &d, ' 1) no* be )550 -L 0)1 0.-TPe t/Ol at pI An3 15 rectwtd 4ron, 4-k& btrpo4r„4,4 o }' Eco\DDay, 11": i! TIME FOR COMPLETION The work on this project shall be completed within 40 calendar days of notice to proceed. Time extensions will be granted for delays caused by others, Northwest Lining or Al Janke. A bid bond equal to five percent of the total bid amount shall accompany each bid proposal. PERFORMANCE BOND Upon award of the contract the contractor shall provide .a performance and guarantee bond equal to one hundred percent [100%] of the total amount of the bid. 3 N Qtr SPECIAL PROVISIONS SANITARY SEWER LAGOON AT SEVEN BAYS, WASHINGTON The following special provisions are to be used in conjunction with the 1988, State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction of Washington State. These special provisions are hereby made a part of the contract, and whenever in these specifications and contract the following terms are used, i.e., the State or Director, it shall mean the duly authorized engineering representative of Simpson Engineers, Inc. The special provisions herein after contained shall supercede any provisions of the ; standard specifications in conflict herewith. DESCRIPTION OF WORK The work proposed under this contract contemplates furnishing all 'materials, labor and equipment necessary to construct:a one:. acre sanitary sewer lagoon. This work will include approximately 8,500 CY of excavation, 6,400 CY of embankment which includes one foot of sand over liner, 850 LF•of '4" diameter force main, 10 LF of 2" diameter force main, 2" raw sewage flow meter and meter box, 930 LF of 6" diameter effluent drain line, 450 LF of 6 foot chain -link fence, one twelve- foot -wide by 6- foot -high chain -link gate, 700 LF of 4.5 foot wire fence - Type 1, 680 CY of rip rap, 70 CY of crushed surfacing, distribution manhole, and other related items of work. The owner will purchase installed by the supplier owner will contract with telephone no. 926 -0181, to for effluent. PREQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS the 30 mil lagoon liner and have it Northwest Lining of Kent, Wa. The Al Janke of Seven Bays and Spokane, construct the overflow concrete siphon This is a private project, but Seven Bays Estates, Inc. retains the right to only permit "responsible ,contractors, in their opinion, to work on this project. FUNDS All funds on this project are those of Seven Bays Estates, Inc. The owner will show evidence of bid amount being available for payment to contractor prior to contractor starting work. ,s- ML'- / 1 TZ•la..C.475At-rtica Ott) ,.-- c.....siat ■-■t•-te 1 ______t_zstx„E ..-Frakig.T•te.i-cr 71-. ,. _ _ . .. . . -. - ..• - o i ...— ' 1......:-....-_,............---, . _____ --.,- ___. — . . i . :.............. - —._., --_, _ ....---c.....„-,....-- ., —,........_...- ---4--L---_ter E SPECIAL PROVISIONS SANITARY SEWER LAGOON AT SEVEN BAYS, WASHINGTON The following special provisions are to be used in conjunction with the 1988,. State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction of Washington State. These special provisions are hereby made a part of the contract, and whenever in these specifications and contract the following terms are used, i.e., the State. or Director, it shall mean the duly authorized engineering representative of Simpson Engineers, Inc. The special provisions herein after contained shall supercede any provisions of the standard specifications in conflict herewith. DESCRIPTION OF WORK The work proposed under this contract contemplates furnishing all materials, labor and equipment necessary to construct a one - acre sanitary sewer lagoon. This .work will include approximately 8,500 CY of excavation, 6,400 CY of embankment which includes one foot of sand over liner, 850 LF of 4" diameter force main, 10 LF of 2" diameter force main, 2" raw sewage flow meter and meter box, 930 LF of 6" diameter effluent drain line, 450 LF of 6 foot chain -link fence, one twelve- foot -wide by 6- foot -high chain -link gate, 700 LF of 4.5 foot wire fence - Type 1, 680 CY of rip rap, 70 CY of crushed surfacing, distribution manhole, and other related items of work. The owner will purchase the 30 mil lagoon liner and have it installed by the supplier, Northwest Lining of Kent, Wa. The owner will contract with Al Janke of Seven Bays and Spokane, telephone no. 926 -0181, to construct the overflow concrete siphon for effluent. PREQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS This is a private project, but Seven Bays Estates, Inc. retains the right to only permit responsible contractors, in their opinion, to work on this project. FUNDS All funds on this project are those of Seven Bays Estates, Inc. The owner will show evidence of bid amount being available for payment to contractor prior to contractor starting work. 2 '-�- -�' N LINE ' F /5- y r EDGE 9AV2.T1 PHnse s 0 n ¢.q w' rn // mi(frQ I 9 c e r-e; -F 0`r . hO i% b' +ke/LI ( A 11,5 0) ow � \ / 2 �. , VN �� ' 'NO,g Ny �_- To w. tits&kstti D 1 , u ss: 41_deed /oig75 ...T dcAsr Ste _ /a d . dirt e __ wk _osaowt . _3 ) /vA%? reem nt _ 2e4A oe e- - .71SVeJl"- 1' 1141 -- - - e_ ?Witt ; ps Dra-ew -$e4kvr. :14 .h& - —Pce a tr -u T * _so/v4h;% . _ — - Ala for . *. re Arc / et e - - _ we -- _4,cae _ , fieine -v rfle�f /mss Wee 1 /,thee a ee1/rn o..c 5 4fes Don_ Tat , 7 . .lgvdsc e _ Ql.4r� /neat f e _s.qr zo cd lG - - -Q r - - -Mae 4f/_ o .d-_ is_4a - .r/ //jttP.C��«- - Q7°v11�- - -- 7 -91 ate.. - / T-co —__0 _ art Pape 7 is:.. !vo*l�o�_ rle . e?4 _ cwt- ea 5 &wed (4 --et _ __a .ewi Ansse . , e'xff s mot - -- - ,a27si. Ssic a ••. C oe - Ake - / / / // /GCS /�'ti a`u.�?Jd.¢.✓ I ra E /ue.+ - aeeT a 9 ccesl ge• — — fi /5c q,ch 1anJ 4 4' L'owna.a 1. ;;. - t a.wa_ _ do - Qvx ta_ cvet.e.S-- -acts s . 13�.t.. _., d 4i'°- 4.7 —co 6 - . 4 C O V A / V 4 1 . 4 . t a r A t ) A t . ; 55 l ' e s o n . , L t 9 L 2 - 1 2 L u z . _ RA e • FeAz toll-Q-A/Ws:a* ufev1/4—Mda - - - 0 ( Awn 222" 714420 _Meat_ v4 ..$r *tater_ assertica With 74e _ee-r--efornacte_-__ _ 6944.7&e--c-4, ae-c-of -carat a•c..14-e; 64 ''Ve5Ererec-g-r .tie ta/l( _ae/ _ _ Bodkin-a i/scasfs/en_ err a essilik eonnetel° /Va _ _ - _ _ _ _ er.i_e#L _ -70-trwe-44-ier 4 ,a_ le an aortoefr _r___%trireinneds- _5%4/7 le__."-deo_-ess,c,_ - - - "or__ /ern/ -Threeredivax 22/45censio _ _ #94, _ discussion_ el 544ez4zr-7 S • 416 temW_t 4./ts 41e. -0.2,90-4,-We fist - tzfid lost - dr4. evilLA *ne, - fiegen"6'7 -465 _ertotentearre- _ _ _ _ _ • - a *zee AIL _ Art.24.-‘6 7C- 048141, -e--;nenes-e-set4-a 4 .tifee-ta-;-$-%1 - /Of_ atotrit, gai Acconn eze. A A11441 Th ettite' aa a r t: 7 da414 Se141;01, reit-640-os( at‹: 6-k_ Cie one ets . �a -e 'i ---- - - - - -- -- —max _ .-ce il .,-_,- e /Gnu - Pri _ Gam_ -e a _ Ceiacer_e.d - sfas _reed+,* _0~ adpv tetel fat _ _ 49 V t.,;Lutv _ _ t so II-C'•N er?ra - __ Gee..✓. ? G/C- - /V..ee-, 4 cLec! . rte. i C la F2 tl L-- — / Q � / -- p�'�/ _ - d� C_vt \�e R5. DAIS &G ` / Lv\ "e 4J -- D_ :?3,-, _ p ro /c _ o_roh,S - '�.I . li o AiKt _ -- `� - c't_, \— I ff- Ei/dcs E - P < 9 09 J D ? (� ks *. ex l_s ( /' 0 _C 6, ): Fly/ `s, G � TO: Cary ka rill .. IT' SUBJECT: c7 L, \1tv PAw:k._ Syll to an Ain X. T_Kasnna y DATE: 11 c‘dem)?vr- 14, 1989 A�i � br^ aekaa your tn•INrrnAA - lala 1 A A. le -Inr n" r,4iltky »e.s I li 411A1 14Angr.vl P lh¢ 1-,arl in s•- ..lIAA �v,r]Fti S..II, 'tnwd ` 1 Yn„ 1.1tl1 fI4-k 424• a. 2 /i milli ,,n ( - 7 A pto- t.:oo-s t nr4AR&el -Co A. 9 ((.� 11 k 1 (� '•ern t C. t;:n•F.••o1S. ..• :The 2 ^ d- pUt^. 1 ..)eH'e� e.-1 • F n" tiny _ n (� !, S p & a. -41 4.. f utpnnt- • `: ... . . J... .. la . 1 , .. : I ... 1(. ..�:. .. J Ja ..'l... .. .. . ;JnC, „ 1iq LI sr.:3r,:', .e,5':+.: :C4:fs .. t•. e': 1 CLARENCE E. SIMPSON ENGINEERS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS N. 909 Argonne Road Spokane, Washington 99212 Telephone: 926 -1322 Fax: 926 -1323 Signed OFF I C_ E OF THE COUNTY ENS I NEEF' SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TC: Bert Haight FROM: Gary Nelson DATE: July 21, 1585 SUBJECT: Sullivan Park Center Yesterday you conducted a meeting with R.A. Hansen regarding the railroad property we are all interested iri. Mr. Hanson indicated that he first tried to get all the railroad property he bordered, and was told by the railroad that he had to come to some agreement with his neighbors as to how to split the property. He thi=n indicated he ' changed what he sent the railroad, and is now only trying to get what he boarders on both sides. Mr: Hoover said we were trying to acquire what Mr. Hanson did not want. My question is this, What are we trying to acquire? Are we trying to acquire whatever Mr. Hanson did not want E:EFOF:E he changed what he sent the railroad? This would be all the property Mr. Hanson does not hoarder O ONE SIDE. Or are we tying to acquire what Mr. Hanson is not NOW trying to acquire? This would be all the property Mr. Hansen does not boarder ON E C3TH SIDES - ' Another way to ask it is this.. Did Mr. Hoover change his request to the railroad to correspond to Mr. Hanson's latest request? If not, then NEITHER: Mr. Hanson nor Spokane County is requesting the property that Mr. Hanson hoarders only on one side, and therefore Mr. Hansen will not be able to make the required connec=tion to file his plat. This will make Mr. Hanson very upset, and he will be very upset with us for not acquiring the property he needs. Please check with Mr. Hoover and be sure we are attempting to acquire the property that R.A. Hansen boarders only on one side. � Washington State •lJ Department of Transportation District 6 No nn 2714 Mayfair Greet P.O. Sox 5299 Nor^Central Station SooKane. Wasning =99205 -0299 (509) 456-3000 Mr. Donald E. Johns R. A. Hansen Company, Inc. P. O. Box 7400 Spokane, WA 93207 Dear Mr. Johns: RQA:np Attachment cc: Carl Olson Gene Wright December 16, 1988 RONALD Q. ANDERSON, P. E. Project Development Engineer Duane aerentson Secretary of Transcor [anon RE: SR 90, Sullivan Park Center New Access Points on the Interstate Attached is a copy of a draft policy from the FHWA that provides new guidelines for establishing an additional interchange on the Interstate System. I just received the draft yesterday, and it will obviously impact our recent correspondence and discussions concerning the extent and costs of preparing a study to gain FHWA concurrence. The information required is obviously more detailed than what was presented in the previous lisi We can assist in providing traffic and accident data, as well as reviewing a draft report prior to submittal for approval. Please call me at (509) 456 -3029 if you have questions. Sincerely, Subject: MeMOTandUM US.Depanmenr Room 312 Mohawk Building of Tansportat on 708 S. W. Third Avenue Portland, Highway Oregon Ore On 97204 Proposed Guide - New /or Revised Access Points. and Interchanges on the Interstate, System From: M. Eldon Gseeen Regional Administrator HE0 -010.3 520.9 To: DIVISION ADMINISTRATORS Mr. B. F. Morehead, Juneau, Alaska (MDR-AK) Mr. J. T. Coe, Boise, Idaho (FDA -ID) Mr D E Wiiken, Salem, Oregon (I-DA -0R) Mr. P. C. Grecson, Olvmoia, Washington (HDA -WA) We have developed the attached paper as a guide for new /or revised access points and interchanges on the Interstate Freeway System. It is being provided for your information, comment and possible use in :the interim as you see fit. Any comments received will be considered in developing the final copy of the guide. _ Attachment !7erp i iI • ;3 I ,� I 1 :nrl lJP • uri l les EiZR .'Y:i:ll i:r �' ' Dare: September 13, 1988 Reply to Attn. at Robert 8. Hathaway, Director Office of Engineering and Oper4tions FnWA REGION 10 GUIDE FOR Rc/IEi OF NEWREVISED Access Points and Interchanges an the Interstate Freeway System DRAFT General The Interstate Freeway System and other freeways have been developed and constructed at great cost to provide an acceptable level of service to the motorino public, to insure operational safety, permanence, utility, and in some cases flexibility for passible future expansion. As growth continues it is expected that access chances aloha these freeways will be required, however, it is essential that any proposed revisions be fully evaluated to ensure that the inteari_v of the system is maintained and that the current and future impacts on operations, safety, and the environment are fully evaluated. This guide is intended to establish - uniformity for 'review of State's proposals and is applicable rec of the source of funds. Resrnsces AASHTO "A policy on geometric design of highways and streets." AASHTO "A policy on design standards - Interstate System." USC 23 CFR Parts 620, 625, and 771 The Inteerstate cost estimate instruction manual. Badkcomaund As growth continues throughout the country there are increasing pressures to add to and /or improve the existing freeway system. • There is an increasing number of proposals both public and private to add new interchanges and /or modify existinc inter changes. The growth and pressure for development which impact the freeways cannot be ignored. While the majority of the proposed projects are publicly funded there is an increasing number that is. funded by private developers with no public funds involved. While the Interstate_ system is nearing completion of r sections of the freeway system are aperatino at or above capacity at many locations and it's ability to:accommodate increased traffic demands caused by growth and development is diminishing. It is critical, therefore, to Insure that all safety and operational impacts to the freeway are fully assessed to ensure the integrity of the system 15 maintained prior to our action on new or significantly modified interchanges. FnwA does not appose appropriate proposals. The funding arrangement does not relieve the State or FHWA of the responsibilities of 23 USC 109 an desian standards and maintenance responsibilities_. New access paints to the Interstate require the approval action of the Administrator (23 CFR 620). Evaluation Proms The primary purpose of the interstate freeway is to accommodate lancer intra- reg_iona? trips. The local street and highway network i5 for Snorter trips These facilities are integral parts of the whole, therefore, the. impacts on the -2- DRAFT system as a whale from modifying any part should be fully evaluated. It follows that any request for a new interchange or any addition and /or modification of existing access paints must consider and address the fallowing points. 1. Freeway carridbr Operations Review - As appropriate level of service (LOS) analysis far current and design year traffic, design and running speeds, meroina, diverging and weaving operations will be preformed. When a reduction in the LOS is evident, alternate access points, local circulation systems and model options should be evaluated. All feasible and prudent measures that would raise the LOS (auxiliary lanes, ramp meters, HOV, etc.) should be fully evaluated. 2. Impacts on Adjacent Interchanges - Adequate spacing between interchanges is essential for efficient and safe operation. It is FHWA policy to locate interchanges in urban areas at least two miles apart. Where this. is not possible a minimum one -mile spacing (two miles in suburban areas). should be used. When the spacing is below the minimum distance other alternatives such as frontage roads, collector-distributor roads, aid ramp metering must be considered. 3. Interctiance Desiai - The design is to conform to AASHTO Geometric design standards and accommodate all movements. A random ramp without a reciprocal return movement should not be used. Freeway to freeway connectors should not include local access ramps. The interchange configuration (exits and entrances) will be compatible with adjacent interchanges to assure uniformity of exits and route and lane continuity. 4. Local Stmt Network - Local streets must have adequate capacity and comprise a sufficient system to accommodate the ramp volumes without backing up traffic an the mainlanes of the freeway. Comprehensive planning and subsequent commitment to any needed improvement of the local system by the local jurisdiction must be evident. 5. Hichxay Safety - Accident data must be analyzed. The impacts on safety of the proposed addition or modification will be fully evaluated. Adverse impacts en hichway safety must be mitigated. Information and Sim -tom =ra Data for Acditicnal Am".. Points The following information will be provided in support of a request for approval of new and /or revised points of access on completed sections of the Interstate freeway. This guidance is not intended to dictate particular format but rather the content of a request. New access points in rural and isolated areas may not require the same level of detail. 1. Purpose 2. Relationship to other hichway plans and programs 3. Distances to and size of communities or activities directly served 4'. Description of existing and proposed access: DRAFT a. • Configuration of existing and proposed interchange. b. Distances to adjacent interchanges c. Alternatives that have been considered. d. Description of any substandard features. e.. Freeway mainline and crossroad traffic volumes (ADT and DHV) including turning movements, for current year and design year. f. Allumber of lanes, freeway and crossroad, include auxiliary lanes and 0-0 road. 5. Description of local street network and any proposal or planned improvements. 6.. Traffic and operational analysis for existing and proposed conditions; including crossroads and adjacent local network to the extent necessary to assure adequate capacity to handle projected traffic volumes. 7'. Accident data analysis to assure safety enhancament and mitigation of any adverse impact. 8. Other information that will help explain and /or support the proposal, e.g., cast - effectiveness analysis, funding, implementation schedule, etc. 9. Acknowledgement that the proper environmental document will be necessary. A suggested process for orderly development leading to the necessary administrative action would be (1) To develop an initial enaineering feasibility study that would contain information on the items listed above; and (2) To develop procedures to ensure that Federal environmental requirements are met which would lead to the development and approval of an appropriate environmental document. These steps could be done in the above order or concurrently. There may be cases where the administrative action approving a change in access control is granted on the basis of the initial feasibility study and before the environmental document is completed. This approval ac *ion would be subject to compliance, with. all applicable Federal environmental requirements and the approval of the environmental document. In every case the Division Office should discuss these proposals with the Region Office at an early stage and determine. a possible approval process. Evaluation The Division Office will examine the submission for c mpleteriess and make an evaluation and recommendation on the proposal before forwarding the request to the Region Office for review, comment, and /or approval by that office or by Headquarters. i «1. 9 ?Feast RSV 4- CO VVIl ellj kl tf -u -4 I -90 /SULLIVAN ROAD INTERCHANGE MODIFICATIONS SPOKANE, WASHINGTON Scope of Work The design report will address the following topics: Jurisdiction and history of improvements at the I -90 /Sullivan interchange. Review ongoing or proposed roadway improvements in the transportation improvement program (TIP). 2. Inventory of existing conditions, including geometrics, posted speed, right -of -way, structures and drainage. Review available soils information. Provide existing traffic counts (including classification and traffic mix), accident data and rates and design year traffic. Traffic projections will be obtained from the Sullivan Park EIS, together with capacity analyses and conceptual improvement alternatives. Perform traffic signal warrant analysis for the Sullivan /Indiana intersection. Indicate a proposed signal layout including detection, pedestrian phases and interconnection to adjacent signals. Prepare a preliminary progression plan. Develop a 50 -scale design of the proposed Sullivan /Indiana intersection, showing project limits, turning radii, sight distances, access control limits, channelization, pavement marking and right -of -way requirements. / 7. Develop a layout for the proposed supplementary ramp connections, including horizontal and vertical alignment, side slopes, grading requirements, sight dis- tances and intersection details at the Indiana Avenue terminii. VS. Prepare preliminary plans for illumination, fencing, utility locations, maintenance of traffic and drainage within the project limits. i v9. Bus stop, pedestrian and bicycle service. 4 0. Perrnit and environmental requirernents. " 1 11. Construction cost estimate. v12. A design report, with accompanying drawings, will be prepared using the WSDOT long -forrn format. 5POnANE COUNTY COURT HOUSC PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 PR. I OR I T Y FEE AG R E E M E N T Agreement Number Piro 4 This agreement between Spokane County and ?.d• t-\4��rA Ckb, whose interest in the project is CIV41407.2.. , is entered into this °ATM day of eN=TOP`+A{t , 19%1 . This agreement is applicable to he project known as: c " - g-I w vo.a- tc. C�� ? That the individuals and parties named herein as having an interest in the above described property or project agree to the following: 1. They request that priority review be given to their project. 2. They agree to reimburse Spokane County for project review fees as specified in Board of County Commissioner's Resolution 80- 1592 attachment C, as amended. The fees will be based on overtime costs incurred by Spokane County for project reviews plus a ten percent administrative charge, and will be billed monthly as accrued. 3. The undersigned agrees that these fees are due and payable upon receipt of the billing as specified above. The monthly billing should be sent to the attention of: moo. F3c„r `74001 *t W A a—Act—kgeCs oat I understand that failure to pay these fees may result in delay in completion or approval of the project or other possible sanctions. By t — ( 0 Pzvlr . A. NAAnS01.3 Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 • • • • • 1ECK.NUFJISER IL • , • • • , . • • RECE1 T Received From Address Datea1989 0931 c Dollars tyno itta-e AMT. OF ACCOUNT ACCOUNT HOW PAID SPOKANE courm Ericurrys N. 811 JEFF. _s 8K808 REIN FORM MAT. PAID BALANCE DUE CASH CHECK MONEY ORDER By • , .1, A.! HANSON:COMPANY!) INC'' tt.036/4bo Spok . . . . I .7.." DESCRIPTION ,/1*,r.r. • _ . j • n;-Thl • .11 la 7 1 1 1 ••• :• •••••• ' I 7.•:::::111=1:1== -7 • :• j , IIF'rj II' = : 4'1 Sul 1 v a ii Development =utt- - ,-, • ': !:, -- Ty_ 11 . : 7 1, 7 1,: : - „21 1 ::: •• ;11 11 " 22 - 11 1" - -=IlinHi 1—`7:!11.,—..1•Y--,---•1 I t•z:it.::::Tr-: AMOUNT — , DISCOUNTS ;IF i t r- r,t I I -- GROSS AMOUNT • DISCOUNTS . NET AMOUNT =LI} 111 1 . 1: HECKI ill 111-111—riti 41 iu - -- — ti r 7 jirT .11 1it 1 JzalCotga A.:HANSON nt 1-1 nerHundred •--- •• t-= • . 7 . 7 ,1 nt .,1; 1 ; - "" t "^"..1t1:"7.0 t •••-. I , DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT. • s p.0.119x .7400, 99207, I; CHAPEL RIO 21— .• . -4 n I ' ' I FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK s CHECK DATE .; CHECK NO?'.;', 1il.;2041989 5 • • • • • - — r•1 --- Pi& [I 111 „. iSpokane County " Engineer 7 - . • , • - , • „ - : _ .■ - .Dollarstandr.00ts - - -1 - —:. . . C is '..!2:1;!' .— III .7 1 II --•• - 1 ` 1 .1.: , ; ;! ..? Ti; 't .7 - -::::1 I . __ I f , ,...... 11 ....."-- t i ! :"...., I i , 17.71 , W7- ■ :':* i i I F.::: i i , 4":: : :::: -?}. . . 1 • . • FLA HANSON COMPANY. INC. s■Lm - T .- 11 11'0 SO 2 9 40 5 3 10 1 56 II: 7 99BELLLSS0 agnea ,Q oaent ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW Douglas S. Adams Subdivision Adminis rator Spokane County P1.nning Dept. Broadway Center :uilding N. 721 Jeffer-on Street Spokane, Wa ington 99260 Doug: Sullivan Park Center Per our telephone conversation yesterday, we are requesting that the Spokane County staff approve an alternate construction schedule for Phase I of the Sullivan Park project by substituting additional square footage in the shopping center in lieu of construction of the 300 room hotel site. I have attached hereto a copy of Page 4 of the 1985 Draft Supplemental Environment Impact Statement (DSEIS). You will note that the DSEIS allowed alterations for construction in Phase I, and that is basically what we are seeking in this instance. We would propose that the shopping center square footage be increased to at least 800,000 square feet and in return, the hotel site would not be developed until Phase II. We premises this request on the Trip Generation figures which were used in determining the phased construction of this project. The project Trip Generation figures are set forth on Page 21 of the 1985 DSEIS, a copy of which is also enclosed herewith. August 3, 1989 Would you please process this request at your very earliest convenience. I am providing a copy of this letter and attachments to the County Engineering staff this date. Thank you. DMB/slm Enclosure cc: R.A. Hanson Company Price Development Very truly yours, DREW M. BODKER Attorney at Law 5. 1401 GRAND BLVD.. SUITE 203 NORTH Jliala ee, radarait 99203 (509) 456-5100 FAX: (509) 4565114 NRORMATICN CREW BODKER Following the scoping process, the areas requiring discussion in this supplemental EIS were determined to be: circulation /traffic; sewage disposal; phasing; and site develop- ment standards. ALTERNATIVES Phasing Alternatives The development is proposed to occur in three general phases. Phase I would include three major department stores and approximately 60 smaller shops, for a total gross leasable area (GLA) of about 650,000 square feet. A 300 -room hotel may also be developed in Phase 1. As an alternative, Phase I could include a smaller shopping center of approximately 485,000 square feet and 150 hotel rooms, with some of the difference replaced by up to 110,000 square feet of business park development. The balance of the property would be developed in future phases, dependent on financing and market conditions. The approximate site areas and GLAs for each phase and each use are shown in Table I, and the locations of the various uses are shown in Figure 2. For comparative purposes, Table II shows the phasing previously proposed and analyzed in the 1981 EIS. TABLE I PROPOSED PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AREAS AND PHASING 4 Phase I By 1990 Phase 11 1990 -1995 Phase 111 1995 -2000 Proposed Phasing 1990 1990 Sq.Ft. Acres Per Year 5 -year Growth 1995 Sq.Ft. 1995 Acres Per Year 5 -year Growth 2000 Sq.Ft. 2000 Acres Regional Center 650,000 46.6 55,000 275,000 925,000 66.4 21,000 105,000 1,030,000 73.9 Other Commercial -- -- 22,600 113,000 113,000 8.6 41,000 205,000 \ 318,000 24.0 (Total Commercial) (650,000) (46.6) (77,600) (388,000) (1,038,000) (75.0) (62,000) (310,000) (1,348,000) (97.9) Hotel (300 rooms) 11.0 -- -- (300 rooms) 11.0 -- -- (300 rooms) 11.0 Business Park -- -- 58,800 294,000 294,000 16.9 19,200 96,000 390,000 22.4 Industrial Park -- -- 66,000 330,000 330,000 21.6 94,000 470.000 800,000 52.6 Total Developed 650,000 57.6 202,400 1,012,000 1,662,000 124.5 175.2 876,000 2,538,000 183.9 (300 rooms) (300 rooms) (300 rooms) Phase I Phase II Phase 111 By 1990 1990 -1995 1995 -2000 1990 1990 5 -year 1995 1995 5 -year 2000 2000 Alternative Phasing Sq.Ft. Acres Per Year Growth Sq.Ft. Acres Per Year Growth Sq.Ft. Acres Regional Center 485,000 34.8 88,000 440,000 925,000 66.4 21,000 105,000 1,030,000 73.9 Other Commercial -- -- 22,600 113,000 113,000 8.6 41,000 205,000 318,000 24.0 (Total Commercial) (485,000) (34.8) (110,600) (553,000) (1,038,000) (75.0) (62,000) (310,000) (1,348,000) (97.9) Hotel (150 rooms) 6.0 -- (150 rooms) (300 rooms) 11.0 -- -- (300 rooms) 11.0 Business Park 110,000 6.3 36,800 184,000 294,000 16.9 19,200 96,000 390,000 22.4 Industrial Park -- -- 66,000 330,000 330,000 21.6 94,000 470.000 800,000 52.6 Total Developed 595,000 47.1 213,400 1,067,000 1,662,000 124.5 175.2 876,000 2,538,000 183.9 (150 rooms) (150 rooms) (300 rooms) (300 rooms) Following the scoping process, the areas requiring discussion in this supplemental EIS were determined to be: circulation /traffic; sewage disposal; phasing; and site develop- ment standards. ALTERNATIVES Phasing Alternatives The development is proposed to occur in three general phases. Phase I would include three major department stores and approximately 60 smaller shops, for a total gross leasable area (GLA) of about 650,000 square feet. A 300 -room hotel may also be developed in Phase 1. As an alternative, Phase I could include a smaller shopping center of approximately 485,000 square feet and 150 hotel rooms, with some of the difference replaced by up to 110,000 square feet of business park development. The balance of the property would be developed in future phases, dependent on financing and market conditions. The approximate site areas and GLAs for each phase and each use are shown in Table I, and the locations of the various uses are shown in Figure 2. For comparative purposes, Table II shows the phasing previously proposed and analyzed in the 1981 EIS. TABLE I PROPOSED PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AREAS AND PHASING 4 Land Use Pha5e 1 _ Phase p Phase 111 Building Area PM Peak Daily Trip Ends (vpd) Trips (vph) In Out _ Building Area PM Peak Daily Trip Ends (vpd) Trips (vph) In Out Building Area PM Peak Daily Trip Ends (vpd) Trips (vph) In Out Commercial 650,000 sq.1t. 24,180 1,034 1,073 1,038,000 sq.ft. 38,510 1,453 1,972 1,348,000 sq.ft. 43,984 1,483 1,901 Business Park - 294,000 sq.ft. 3,205 71 529 390,000 sq_h. 6,268 94 703 Hotel 300 rooms 3,150 108 111 300 rooms 3,150 108 111 300 rooms 3,150 108 111 Industrial Park 330,000 sq.ft. 1 106 208 800,000 sgJt 3,505 253 504 _ _ Total 27,330 1,142 1,134 46,667 1,738 2,820 58,907 1,940 3,219 Trip Generation Estimates of trip generation were derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) document Trip Generation (third edition). Daily and peak hour forecasts for project - related traffic are summarized in Table IV. A total of approxi- mately 27,000 daily vehicle trip ends are projected for Phase I, 47,000 in Phase II, and 59,000 in Phase III. The directional trip estimates for the afternoon peak hour are also presented for each phase. An alternative first phase is also under consideration by the proponent, and is described in Table I in the Summary. The trip generation of this alternative Phase I would be 27,250 daily trips, and 1,200 outbound trips in the pm peak. Thus, the critical volume of peak -hour traffic would be nearly identical in either plan. TABLE IV PROJECT TRIP GENERATION 21 Trip Distribution Trips were assigned to the roadway network on the basis of zonal population forecasts prepared by the Spokane Regional Planning Conference in February 1985. These forecasts include both population and employment predictions for the years 1990, 1995 and 2000. Population forecasts were also obtained for Kootenai County, Idaho to reflect the eastern portion of the market area. A simplified gravity model was used to distribute trips among these zones, using travel time as a measure of impedance. Compared to the original EIS, the Spokane County population forecasts for the year 2000 have remained relatively stable at approximately 412,000 persons, although there Mr. M.D. Tranum, P.E., Dist. Administrator Washington State Dept. of Transportation District 6 North 2714 Mayfair Street P.O. Box 5299, North Central Station Spokane, Washington 99205 -0299 Dear Mr. Tranum: set /0053v Attachment u N OU OF C /C aCio/,E ��, ?+ -u COUNTY M COM /SS /ONERS First District STEVEN HASSON Second District SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0100 March 28, 1989 RE: Proposed Evergreen Road - I -90 Interchange The County Engineer has completed the review of the proposed Evergreen Road -I -90 Interchange concept design required in the conditions of approval for mitigating adverse traffic impacts from ZE- 180 -78 and PE- 1504 -85, Sullivan Park Center. The County Engineer recommended to the Board that with the pro ision that Evergreen Road be constructed to connect between the County's existing Mission Avenue and the proposed Indiana Avenue and that this connec- tion be constructed to a minimum of a five -lane cross - section, the concept design is consistent with Spokane County design standards and practices. The Board of County Commissioners at their weekly meeting on March 21, 1989 considered the recommendation of the County Engineer and unanimously (resolution 89 -0264 attached) concurred with the County Engineer's finding and recommendation. The Board is happy to support this project and the proposed development at this phase in the process. We appreciate the opportunity to review, comment and coordinate our County Road System plans with the Depart- ment of Transportation. Thank you for considering our comments. Very truly yours, C John R. McBride, Chairman Board of County Commissioners fE-I 504 -85" PATRICIA A. MUMMEY Third District ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 89 0264 IN THE MATTER OF ) AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE ON LETTER OF ) CONCURRENCE SUPPORTING THE CONCEPT ) DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED I- 90- EVERGREEN) ROAD INTERCHANGE - ) SULLIVAN PARK CENTER ), WHEREAS, the conditions of approval for PE- 1504 -85, ZE- 180 -78, Sullivan Park Center required the developer of the proposal to construct a new inter- change on Interstate 90 at Evergreen Road as a measure mitigating adverse 'traffic impacts created by the proposal; and :WHEREAS, the Developer's consulting . engineer has prepared a concept ?'design for the proposd interchange; and • WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has requested concurrence from Spokane County prior to submitting the concept design to the Federal Highway Administration; and WHEREAS, the County Engineer has reviewed the proposed concept design and found that with the provision that the Evergreen Road connection between Mission Avenue and proposed Indiana Avenue be constructed to a five lane cross- section, the concept design is consistent with Spokane County design standards and •practices; and WHEREAS, the County Engineer recommends Spokane County concur with the 1 proposed concept design. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, that the Chairman of the Board is authorized to sign a letter to the Washington State Department of Transportation concurring in the proposed concept design. PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Board of. County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, this 21st day of March, 1989. 2002o/4 OF THE B DEPUTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON R E S O L U T I 0 N ip BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON , �� U RESOLUTION N0. 89 0264 IN THE MATTER OF ) AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE ON LETTER OF ) CONCURRENCE SUPPORTING THE CONCEPT ) DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED I -90- EVERGREEN) ROAD INTERCHANGE - ) SULLIVAN PARK CENTER , ) WHEREAS, the conditions of approval for._P 04 -85, ZEZE- 180 -78 Sullivan Park Center required the developer of the proposal to construct a new inter- change on Interstate 90 at Evergreen Road as a measure mitigating adverse traffic impacts created by the proposal; and WHEREAS, the Developer's consulting engineer has prepared a concept design for the proposd interchange; and .WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has requested concurrence from Spokane County prior to submitting the concept design to the Federal Highway Administration; and WHEREAS, the County Engineer has reviewed the proposed concept design and found that with the provision that the Evergreen Road connection between Mission Avenue and proposed Indiana Avenue be constructed to a five lane cross- section, the concept design is consistent with Spokane County design standards and practices; and WHEREAS, the County Engineer recommends Spokane County concur with the proposed concept design. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, that the Chairman of the Board is authorized to sign a letter to the Washington State Department of Transportation concurring in the proposed concept design. PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, this 21st day of March, 1989. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE R E S O L U T I O N BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON fe÷1{± 5 vo SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE Mr. Richard Simpson, P.E. N. 909 Argonne Rd. Spokane, WA 99206 Dear Mr. Simpson: C TIM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 - 0170 February 10, 1989 RI LC: Cony Attached are the updated cross - sections for the R.A. Hanson zone change and plat at Sullivan Road. These cross - sections include the wider outside travel lane used for the slower moving right turning vehicles, the separated sidewalk location and the minimum right -of -way width requirement. We have used this design concept the past couple of years for major commercial /industrial developments (Main's Meadow Wood, Spokane Industrial Park Expansion, and the Boeing. Site on West Plains) and believe it will meet the range of needs for these high traffic generating and high access demanding developments. Also shown on the cross - section for the Phase 1 improvement of Indiana Avenue from Sullivan Road to Evergreen Road is the Planning Commission re- quirement for the median planting and landscaping strip to be provided through the commercial shopping center portion of the site. The exact amount or lengths of this type of median treatment will depend on specific design items, such as, shopping center driveway approach locations and lengths of needed left -turn lane to access the driveways. Also, please note that all develop- ment "Phase 2" roadway cross - sections including the Evergreen Road Connection from Mission Avenue to Indiana Avenue and the Evergreen Road Crossing of I -90; are 5 -lane curb -to -curb widths with the center left -turn lane. Please let us know if you have any questions as you proceed to develope final site plans and plat map. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Gary W. Kennaly, P.E. Planning & Traffic Engineer Enc. cc: Donald E. Johns GWK /las /177 Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 DRA Er: DATE` MJH SCE HORIZONTAL NONE OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER N. 811 JEFFERSON ST. SPOKANE , WA 99280 458 -3800 APPROVED PHASE 1 INDIANA AVENUE SHEET 1 OF b D �+ APPROVED' DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY: VERTICAL NONE COUNTY ENGINEER DATE: NOTE 8' r SIDEWALK J r '4' .16' EASEMENT .10' SWALE 6 :1 8 :1 TYPE 'B' CURB TYPICAL LEFT AND RIGHT * THIS IS THE MINIMUM WIDTH REQUIRED. WIDTH MAY VARY TO FIT DRAINAGE AND LAND- SCAPE PLAN TO THE TOPO -, GRAPHY OF THE SITE. 'R/W 2' 2' 14' TRAFFIC 38' 12' TRAFFIC 6' 108' 78' 5. 12' TRAFFIC 14' TRAFFIC 2% MIN �`� 2% MIN MEDIAN PLANTING ANO LEFT TURN LANE PHASE 1 INDIANA AVENUE SULLIVAN ROAD TO EVERGREEN ROAD 2' 2' R/W 6 :1 .10' SWALE .16' EASEMENT 8:1 8" SIDETAIN 1 %SECIO.DWG DRA BY: DAM MJH - SCALE aDRnDNTAI: NONE OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER N. 811 JEFFERSON ST. SPOKANE , WA. 99260 458 -3600 APPROVED. PHASE 1 INDIANA AVENUE SHEET 2_0F5 DEVELOPER APPROVED DESIGNED ex: BM COUNTY ENGINEER DATE CHEMED BY: VERTICAL: NONE R/W 37' 37' 20' 20' TRAFFIC 1 TRAFFIC 2% MIN 27. MIN PHASE 1 INDIANA AVENUE EVERGREEN ROAD TO EXISTING INDIANA CONNECTION SPOKANE COUNTY ROADWAY SECTION 4 MAJOR ARTERIAL R/W ppq�Ep p17pN GRASS OITC XSECI,.DWG DRAIN En M SIGNED SCALE Ho omu: NONE OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER N. 811 JEFFERSON ST. SPOKANE , WA. 99260 456 -3800 `PROVED• PHASE 2 INDIANA AVENUE SHEET 3 ors DEVELOL>� APPROVED• Di R1`. OIECE0 rrt VERTICAL: NONE 001Jl77 ENGINEER DATIS • r SIDEWALK 16' EASEMENT 6-7 10' SWALE TYPE 'B' CURB TYPICAL LEFT AND RIGHT 2' 2' 14' TRAFFIC 37' 12' TRAFFIC 2X MIN 7' 106' 74' LEFT 1URN LANE PHASE 2 12' TRAFFIC 2% MIN INDIANA AVENUE EVERGREEN ROAD TO PINES ROAD 14' TRAFFIC 2 R/W 2' 10' SWALE 6:7 6:1 XSEC12.DWG 6' SIDEWALK •16' EASEIAENT •10' SWALE 6:1 6:1 TYPE 'B' CURB TYPICAL LEFT AND RIGHT NOTE * THIS IS THE MINIMUM WIDTH REQUIRED. WIDTH MAY VARY TO FIT DRAINAGE AND LAND- SCAPE PLAN TO THE TOPO- GRAPHY OF THE SITE. ** MAY INCLUDE CHANNELATION FOR LEFT TURNS 2' 2' 14' TRAFFI C 12' TRAFFIC 2% MIN u 8' _ 108' 78' PHASE 2 12' TRAFFIC 2% MIN EVERGREEN ROAD MISSION AVENUE TO INDIANA AVENUE 14' TRAFFIC 2' R/W 2' •10' SWALE .16' EASEMENT 6 :1 6 SIDEWALK I XSECI3.DWO DRAWN BY: DATE MJH DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: SCALE HORIZONTAL NONE VERTICAL NONE OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER N. 811 JEFFERSON ST. SPOKANE , WA. 99280 456 -3600 APPROVED APPROVED DEVELOPER COUNTY ENGINEER DATE PHASE 2 EVERGREEN ROAD SHEET 40F5 DRAWN BE DAT@ S ao � 'c0 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE • WA SO 99280 456 -3800 APPROVED. PHASE 2 INDIANA AVENUE SHEET S OF S DEVELOPER PROVED DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY VERTICAL: NONE ENGINEER COUNTY T DATA NOTE ♦ i g'•••• r 6' r SIDEWALK 1- 4' .16' EASEMENT .10' SWALE 6 :1 6:1 • TYPE 'B' CURB TYPICAL LEFT AND RICHT THIS IS THE MINIMUM WIDTH REQUIRED. WIDTH MAY VARY TO FIT DRAINAGE AND LAND- SCAPE PLAN TO THE TOPO- GRAPHY OF THE SITE. 2' 2' 14' TRAFFIC 12' TRAFFIC 2% MIN 6' 106' 76' 6' LEFT TUR LANE 12' TRAFFIC 2% MIN PHASE 2 INDIANA AVENUE SULLIVAN ROAD EAST TO TERMINUS TO OWNERSHIP LINE 14' TRAFFIC 2' 2' R/W *10' SWALE 416' EASEMENT 6:1 1 6' SDEWAIX 1 XSECI4.DWG August 15, 1989 Spokane County Engineer's N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE Enclosure JOHN W. PEDERSON Planner 11 ISHIED 1a prE /SO PLANNING DEPARTMENT nrir BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 [ AUG 1 5 1989 t SPACE COUNTY ENGINEER Attn: Gary Nelson SUBJECT: Attached correspondence /Sullivan Park Center The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached correspondence from Attorney Drew Bodker on behalf of R. A. Hanson Company and Price Development. In said letter, Mr. Bodker outlines proposed changes to Phase I of the Sullivan Park Center project (see PE- 1504 -85, ZE- 180 -78), and asks the Planning Department to review modifications to information presented in the original development plan, and the 1985 Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. To assist the Planning Department decision whether this request can be made administratively, or through a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner Committee; we solicit your comments regarding Mr. Bodkers' letter relative to your previous conditions of approval, required roadway improvements, SEPA issues, etc. If you have any questions, or require additional infornation, please contact me at your convenience. g aw,ra e/ c aI(a'c ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW Douglas S. Adams Subdivision Administrator Spokane County Planning Dept. Broadway Center Building N. 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Doug: Re: Sullivan Park Center August 3, 1989 S. 1401 GRAND BLVD.. SUITE 203 NORTH r . r*� r 992&19 (509)4585100 FAX (509)456 -5114 Per our telephone conversation yesterday, we are requesting that the Spokane County staff approve an alternate construction schedule for Phase I of the Sullivan Park project by substituting additional square footage in the shopping center in lieu of construction of the 300 room hotel site. I have attached hereto a copy of Page 4 of the 1985 Draft Supplemental Environment Impact Statement (DSEIS). You will note that the DSEIS allowed alterations for construction in Phase I, and that is basically what we are seeking in this instance. We would propose that the shopping center square footage be increased to at least 800,000 square feet and in return, the hotel site would not be developed until Phase II. We premises this request on the Trip Generation figures which were used in determining the phased construction of this project. The project Trip Generation figures are set forth on Page 21 of the 1985 DSEIS, a copy of which is also enclosed herewith. Would you please process this request at your very earliest convenience. I am providing a copy of this letter and attachments to the County Engineering staff this date. Thank you. DMB /slm Enclosure cc: R.A. Hanson Company Price Development Very t Lily y.urs, DREW M. BODKER Attorney at Law Proposed Phasing Phase 1 By 1990 - Phase II 1990 -1995 Phase Ill 1995 -2000 1990 1990 Sq.Ft. Acres Per Year 5-year Growth 1993 Sq.Ft. 1995 Acres Per Year 3-year Growth 2000 Sq.Ft. 2000 Acres Regional Center 650,000 16.6 33,000 275,000 925,000 66.4 21,000 105,000 1,030,000 73.9 Other Commercial - -- -- 22,600 113,000 113,000 1.6 41,000 203,000 \ 318,000 24.0 (Total Commercial) (630,000) (46.6) (77,600) (388,000) (1,031,000) (75.0) (62,000) (310.000) (1,348,000) (97.9) Hotel (300 rooms) 11.0 -- -- (300 rooms) 11.0 - -- (300 rooms) 11.0 Business Park -- 38,800 294,000 294,000 16.9 19,200 96,000 390,000 22.4 Industrial Park -- -- 66.000 330.000. 330.000 21.6 94.000 470.000 100,000 32.6 Total Developed • .630,000 37.6 202,400 1,012,000 1,662,000 124.3 175.2 876,000 2,538,000 183.9 (300 rooms) (300 rooms) (300 rooms) • Phase 1 Phase u Phase III By 1990 1990 -1993 1995 -2000 • 1990 1990 5 -year 1993 1993 3 -year 2000 2000 Alternative Phasing Sq.Ft. Acres Per Year Growth Sq.Ft. Acres Per Year Growth Sq.Ft. Acres Regional Center 483,000 34.8 88,000 440,000 925,000 66.4 21,000 105,000 1,030,000 73.9 Other Commercial -- -- 22,600 113,000 113,000 8.6 41,000 203,000 318,000 24.0 (Total Commercial) (483,000) (34.8) (110,600) (353,000) (1,038,000) (73.0) (62,000) (310,000) (1,348,000) (97.9) Hotel (150 rooms) 6.0 -- (150 rooms) (300 rooms) 11.0 -- -- (300 rooms) 11.0 Business Park 110,000 6.3 36,800 184,000 294,000 16.9 19,200 96,000 390,000 22.4 Industrial Park -- -- 66.000 330,000 330.000 21.6 94.000 470.000 800.000 52.6 Total Developed 393,000 47.1 213,100 1,067,000 1,662,000 124.5 175,2 876,000 2,531,000 183.9 (150 rooms) (150 rooms) (300 room's) (300 rooms) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 Following the scoping process, the areas requiring discussion in this supplemental EIS were determined to be: circulation /traffic; sewage disposal; phasing; and site develop- ment standards. ALTERNATIVES Phasing Alternatives The development is proposed to occur in three general phases. Phase I would include three major department stores and approximately 60 smaller shops, for a total gross leasable area (GLA) of about 650,000 square feet. A 300 -room hotel may also be developed in Phase I. As an alternative, Phase I could include a smaller shopping center of approximately 485,000 square feet and 150 hotel rooms, with some of the difference replaced by up to 110,000 square feet of business park development. The balance of the property would be developed in future phases, dependent on financing and market conditions. The approximate site areas and GLAs for each phase and each use are shown in Table I, and the locations of the various uses are shown in Figure 2. For comparative purposes, Table ll shows the phasing previously proposed and analyzed in the 1981 EIS. TABLE 1 'PROPOSED PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AREAS AND PHASING 4 Land Use Phase 1 Phase O Phase III Building Area PM Peak Daily Trip Ends (vpd) Trips (vph) In Out Building Area PM Peak :. Daily Trip Ends (vpd) Trips (vph) In . Out Building Area - PM Peak Daily Trip - Ends (vpd) Trips (vph) - In Out Commercial 630,000 sq.1t 24,180 1,034 1,073 1,031,000 sq.ft. 38,510 :1,433 1,972 1,348,000 sq.11. 43,984: 1,413 1,901 Business Park 294,000 sq.ft. 3,205 71 . +329 390,000 sq.ft. - 6.261 .' .. ,94 .703 Hotel 300 rooms 3,130 108 111 300 rooms 3,150 108 Ill 300 rooms 3,130 108 111 Industrial Patk 330,000 sq.ft. 1 106 208 800,000 sglt 3 233 304 Total _ 27,330 _ 1,142 _ 1,184 46,667 1,731 2,120 58,907 1,940 3,219 1 1 1 1 1 Trip Generation Estimates of trip generation were derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) document Trip Generation (third edition). Daily and peak hour forecasts for project- related traffic are summarized in Table IV. A total of approxi- mately 27,000 daily vehicle trip ends are projected for Phase I, 47,000 in Phase 11, and 59,000 in Phase III. The directional trip estimates for the afternoon peak hour are also presented for each phase. An alternative first phase is also under consideration by the proponent, and is described in Table I in the Summary. The trip generation of this alternative Phase I would be 27,250 daily trips, and 1,200 outbound trips in the pm peak. Thus, the critical volume of peak -hour traffic would be nearly identical in either plan. TABLE IV PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Trip Distribution Trips were assigned to the roadway network on the basis of zonal population forecasts prepared by the Spokane Regional Planning Conference in February 1985. These forecasts include both population and employment predictions for the years 1990 ;1995 and 2000. Population forecasts were also obtained for Kootenai County, Idaho to reflect the eastern portion of the market area. A simplified gravity model was used to distribute trips among these zones, using travel time as a measure of impedance. Compared to the original EIS, the Spokane County population forecasts for the year 2000 have remained relatively stable at approximately 412,000 persons, although there 21 I _ N554,14-n/JT/cn/5 - ega //f .Dza/ • 2. /5o, 000 it ° Ala / 77 -2 0A 1 /9 L 6 _ r 05-0 1 t_1 /___— 1. flv n 3 _7 - a "jar .093 X 96.55 -,./75 /7V /p4 < -' "* T-/zvs, -«,_/i r 7-e- re .76; g O Ae . /fe 4 L. P, /:-/ /SO coo 6 i2c55__,. -c_- -e s? = re Sd _ " _d��/Tcs._ 15C 00.Q..- - a -- ps/ / �T- c � - '�.v_F,�Ares /0 _ 3!/ vi 'h_�ni-= • c'y3- Tr_�s_ e�pe.,te_ -- -- - d 73 ! /Ph Da T= .0 Vs ?fn of RJc. ga /ri7 - c( froOg / Pfi' //I/ = - G -Y/ 3 X 47 5-45 _ / 7 / it n7o7 w; // 7 arr ede /AV= /oS cee7 /// D V c \ TO 0 u T= 6 7 J UAc y/ao5e. (fry-Rita e a_ Le kajv o 7 = 3 5 % 5 -tAeteQ_ .cu t_�� _Cj2Ntirw e - , • � „ L A Af5 u hkr ! 5 a.. zi * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER N. 811 JEFFERSON ST. SPOKANE, WA 99260 -0180 FAX (509) 456 -4715 TEL (509) 456 -3600 DATE: TIME: /d; TO: e_w 13 o » ICE ✓e. DEPT' MENT: FAX TELEPHONE: Vrt- ` S - /%,7 VOICE TELEPHONE: FROM: /1i irk. Pevkl P s) DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS: PAGE L OF 27 V. j he County in granting this franchise does not waive any right Aihich it now has or may hereafter acquire with respect to County roads, highways and rights -of -way and this franchise shall not be construed to deprive the County of any powers, rights or privileges which it now has or may hereafter acquire to regulate the use of and to control the County roads —and'T hts -of -way covered by this franchise. If, at any time, the County shall cause or require the improvement of any County road, highway or right -of -way wherein grantee maintains facilities subject to this franchise by grading or regrading, planking or paving the same, changing the grade, altering, changing, repairing . or relocating the same or by constructing drainage or sanitary sewer facilities, the grantee upon written notice from the County Engineer shall, with all convenient speed, change the location or readjust the elevation of its system and other facilities so that the same shall not interfere with such County work and so that such lines and facilities shall conform to such new grades or routes as may be established. The relocation of grantee's facilities shall be at the sole expense of grantee where the improvements or changes to the County road, highway or right -of -way benefit the public at large. To the extent the benefit of such improvements inures to adjacent property owners or developers, as determined by the County Engineer, the costs of relocation may be charged, by grantee, to such owners or developers; accordingly, the County shall not authorize any improvement or change until the owner or developer has agreed to pay grantee for the costs of relocation. The County shall in no way be held liable for any damages to said grantee that may occur by reason of any of the County's improvements, changes or works above enumerated, except for damage caused by negligence of the County's employees or agents. VII. The construction, operation and maintenance of the grantee's system authorized by this franchise shall not preclude the County, its agents, or its contractors from blasting, grading, excavating, or doing other necessary roadwork contiguous to the said lines and facilities of the grantee, providing that the grantee shall be given not less than five (5) days notice of said blasting in order that the grantee may protect its lines and facilities; provided further, that in the event of an emergency as determined by the County Engineer, the grantee shall be given forty -eight (48) hours notice. VIII. Before any work is performed under this franchise which may affect any existing monuments or markers of any nature relating to 3 AFTER RECORDING, RETURN TO: Drew M. Bodker Attorney at Law S. 1401 Grand, Suite 203 North Spokane, Wash. 99203 /Cs EASEMENT AGREEMENT 1 44 •r iJ�P9 THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 29th day of August, 1989, by and between R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., a corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor ", and INLAND EMPIRE PAPER COMPANY, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee ", W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Grantor owns a purchaser's interest in that certain real estate legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the Subject Property), and WHEREAS, Grantor intends to develop the Subject Property, and as part of said development Grantor intends to construct an extension of Indiana Avenue across the Subject Property, which road will then be dedicated to Spokane County, and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that a shopping center will be constructed on a portion of the Subject Property and that said shopping center will adjoin the proposed Indiana Avenue extension, and WHEREAS, Grantee may desire to construct a gas line to its plant and property in the future, and as a part of the construction of said gas line it may be necessary to cross the Subject Property owned by Grantor, and WHEREAS, Grantor is willing, under certain conditions, to grant an easement to Grantee for this gas line, NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which the parties acknowledge, it is agreed as follows: 1. GRANT OF EASEMENT. Grantor does hereby grant and convey to Grantee a perpetual, appurtenant, and non - exclusive easement for the purpose of constructing, improving, repairing and maintaining a gas line for use in carrying the flow of gas over, under and across that portion of the Subject Property on which proposed Indiana Avenue is to be constructed pursuant to any final platting of the Subject Property. This easement shall become effective only upon approval of a final plat of the Subject Property which includes, as a condition of said plat, an extension of Indiana Avenue across the Subject Property. 2. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. Grantee shall at all times exercise its rights herein in accordance with the requirements of all applicable statutes, orders, rules and regulations of any public authority having jurisdiction. 3. APPROVAL BY GRANTOR. Prior to any construction, alteration or replacement or any other substantial activity by Grantee upon the portion of the Subject Property which is subject to this easement, a notification and plans for the same shall be submitted in writing to Grantor by Grantee, and no such work by Grantee shall be commenced without Grantor's prior written approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld; PROVIDED HOWEVER, that in the event of an emergency requiring immediate action by Grantee for the protection of its facilities or other persons or property, Grantee may take such action upon such notice to Grantor as is reasonable under the circumstances. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to impose any duty or obligation upon Grantor to determine the adequacy or sufficiency of Grantee's plans. 4. GRANTEE'S USE AND ACTIVITIES. Grantee shall exercise its rights under this Agreement so as to minimize and avoid, if reasonably possible, any interference with Grantor's use of the Subject Property for its customary and usual business purposes, recognizing, in particular, that a large portion of the Subject Property is intended to be used as a shopping center. Grantee shall at all times conduct its activities on the Subject Property so as to not interfere with, obstruct or endanger the Grantor's operations or facilities, or those of any successor in interest ' to Grantor to any portion of the Subject Property. 5. TITLE. The rights granted hereing are subject to permits, leases, licenses and easements, if any, heretofore granted by Grantor affecting the property subject to this Agreement. Grantor does not warrant title to its property and shall not be liable for defects thereto or failure thereof. 6. ASSIGNMENT. Grantee shall not assign its rights hereunder without the prior written consent of Grantor, which consent shall be unreasonably withheld. 7. SUCCESSORS. Subject to the preceding paragraph, the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns, and this Easement Agreement is specifically intended to run with the land. -2- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above — written. GRANTOR GRANTEE R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. Inland Empire Paper Company By: By: President Its STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of Spokane On this day of August, 1989, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared R.A. Hanson, to me known to be the President of R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane. -3- great ye 2thaem. ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW TO: Mike Dempsy Spokane County Prosecutor Civil Department TELEFAX NO.: 456 -4715 DOCUMENTS /PAPERS LISTED BELOW ARE BEING TELEFAXED: X TELEFAX TRANSMITTAL PLEASE DELIVER ASAP Date: September 8, 1989 Re: Easement Agreement Our File No. Proposed Easement Agreement between R.A. Hanson Company and Inland Empire Paper Company URGENT — NEEDS YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION FOR YOUR INFORMATION -. NO ACTION REQUIRED FOR YOUR FILES /RECORDS ITEM BEING HELD PENDING YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT PLEASE CONTACT.ME.UPON RECEIPT OF THIS PER YOUR REQUEST 5. 1401 DRANO ELVO.. SUITE 2:03 NORTH .�jta ezerA r n 991x9 (504) 468-5100 FAX: 0041 454-6114 THE FOLLOWING TELEFAX CONSISTS OF 5 PAGES (INCLUDING THE COVER SHEET-. AFTER "RECORDING, RETURN TO: Drew M Bodker Attorney at Law S. 1401 Grand, suite 203 North Spokane, Wash. 99203 EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 29th day of August, 1989, by and between R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., a corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor ", and INLAND EMPIRE PAPER COMPANY, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee ", W IT N E S S E T H : WHEREAS, Grantor owns a purchaser's interest in that certain real estate legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the Subject Property), and WHEREAS, Grantor intends to develop the Subject Property, and as part of said development Grantor intends to construct an extension of Indiana Avenue across the Subject Property, which road will then be dedicated to Spokane County, and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that a shopping center will be constructed on a portion of the Subject Property and that said shopping center will adjoin the proposed Indiana Avenue extension, and WHEREAS, Grantee may desire to construct a gas line to its plant and property in the future, and as a part of the construction of said gas line it may be necessary to cross the Subject Property owned by Grantor, and WHEREAS, Grantor is willing, under certain conditions, to grant an easement to Grantee for this gas line, NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which the parties acknowledge, it is agreed as follows: 1. GRANT OF EASEMENT. Grantor does hereby grant and convey to Grantee a perpetual, appurtenant, and non - exclusive easement for the purpose of constructing, improving, repairing and maintaining a gas line for use in carrying the flow of gas over, under and across that portion of the Subject. Property on which proposed Indiana Avenue is to be constructed pursuant to any .final platting of the subject Property. This easement - shall become effective only upon approval of. a final - plat of -the Subject Property which includes, as a condition of said plat, an . extension' of Indiana Avenue across the Subject Property. 2. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. Grantee shall at all times exercise its rights herein in accordance with the requirements of all applicable statutes, orders, rules and regulations of any public authority having jurisdiction. 3. APPROVAL BY GRANTOR. Prior to any construction, alteration or replacement or any other substantial activity by Grantee upon the portion of the Subject Property which is subject to this easement, a notification and plans for the same shall be submitted in writing to Grantor by Grantee, and no such work by Grantee shall be commenced without Grantor's prior written approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld; PROVIDED HOWEVER, that in the event of an emergency requiring immediate action by Grantee for the protection of its facilities or other persons or property, Grantee may take such action upon such notice to Grantor as is reasonable under the circumstances. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to impose any duty or obligation upon Grantor to determine the adequacy or sufficiency of Grantee's plans. 4. GRANTEE'S USE AND ACTIVITIES. Grantee shall exercise its rights under this Agreement so as to minimize and avoid, if reasonably possible, any interference with Grantor's use of the Subject Property for its customary' and usual business purposes, recognizing, in particular, that a large portion of the Subject Property is intended to be used as a shopping center. Grantee shall at all times conduct its activities on the Subject Property so as to not interfere with, obstruct or endanger the Grantor's operations or facilities, or those of any successor in interest to Grantor to any portion of the Subject Property. If, at any time, Grantor or its successor, such as Spokane County, shall cause or require the improvement of any County road, highway or right -of- way - wherein Grantee maintains facilities subject to this franchise, by grading or regrading, planking or paving the same, changing the grade, altering, changing, repairing or relocating the same or by constructing drainage or sanitary sewer facilities, the Grantee upon written notice from the Grantor, or Spokane County shall, with all convenient speed, change the location or readjust the elevation of its system and other facilities so that the same shall not interfere with such work and so that such lines and facilities shall conform to such new grades or routes as may be established. The relocation of Grantee's facilities shall be at the sole expense of Grantee where the improvements or changes to the County road, highway or right -of -way benefit the public at large. To the extent the benefit of such improvements inures to adjacent property owners or developers, as determined by the County Engineer, the costs of relocation may be charged, by Grantee, to such owners or developers; accordingly, the County shall not authorize any improvement or change until the owner or developer has agreed to pay Grantee fos' -the costs of relocation. The County shall in no way be held liable for any damages to said Grantee that may occur by reason of any of the County's improvements, changes or works above enumerated, except for damage caused by negligence of the County's employees or agents. The construction, operation and maintenance of the Grantee's system authorized by this Agreement shall not preclude the Grantor or its successors, its agents, or its contractors from blasting, grading, excavating, or doing other necessary roadwork contiguous to the said lines and facilities of the Grantee, providing that the Grantee shall be given not leas than five (5) days notice of said blasting in order that the Grantee may protect its lines and facilities; provided further, that in the event of an emergency as determined by the County Engineer, the Grantee shall be given forty -eight (48) hours notice. 5. TITLE. The rights granted herein are subject to permits, leases, licenses and easements, if any, heretofore granted by Grantor affecting the property subject to this Agreement. Grantor does not warrant title to its property and shall not be liable for defects thereto or failure thereof. 6. ASSIGNMENT. Grantee shall not assign its rights hereunder without the prior written consent of Grantor, which consent shall be unreasonably withheld. 7. SUCCESSORS. Subject to the preceding paragraph, the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns, and this Easement Agreement is specifically intended to run with the land. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above - written. GRANTOR GRANTEE R.A. Ranson Company, Inc. Inland Empire Paper Company By: By: President Its STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of Spokane ) On this day of September, 1989, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared R.A. Hanson, to me known to be the President of R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane .9 cf/ ATTORNEY ANO COUNSELOR AT LAW X . TO Mike Dempsy Spokane County Prosecutor Civil Department TELEFAX NO.: 456 -4715 TELEFAX PLEASE DELIVER A Date: September 8, 1989 Re: Easement Agreement Our File No. DOCUMENTS /PAPERS LISTED BELOW ARE BEING TELEFAXED: Proposed Easement Agreement between R.A. Hanson Company and Inland Empire Paper Company URGENT — NEEDS YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION FOR YOUR INFORMATION -- NO ACTION REQUIRED FOR YOUR FILES /RECORDS ITEM BEING HELD PENDING YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT PLEASE CONTACT ME UPON RECEIPT OF THIS TELEFAX PER YOUR REQUEST S. 1401 GRANO ELM.. SUITE 209 NORTH 1.1 74;144 (509)456.5100 Alt (509)466 -5114 THE FOLLOWING TELEFAX CONSISTS OF 5 PAGES (INCLUDING THE COVER SHEET). SENT SY: SLM 1 AFTER RECORDING, RETURN TO: Drew M. Bodker Attorney at Law S. 1401 Grand, Suite 203 North Spokane, Wash. 99203 EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 29th day of August, 1989, by and between R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., a corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor ", and INLAND EMPIRE PAPER COMPANY, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee ", W I T N E S SETH WHEREAS, Grantor owns a purchaser's interest in that certain real estate legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the Subject Property), and WHEREAS, Grantor intends to develop the Subject Property, and as part of said development Grantor intends to construct an extension of Indiana Avenue across the Subject Property, which road will then be dedicated to Spokane County, and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that a shopping center will be constructed on a portion of the Subject Property and that said shopping center will adjoin the proposed Indiana Avenue extension, and WHEREAS, Grantee may desire to construct a gas line to its plant and property in the future, and as a part of the construction of said gas line it may be necessary to cross the Subject Property owned by Grantor, and WHEREAS, Grantor is willing, under certain conditions, to grant an easement to Grantee for this gas line, NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which the parties acknowledge, it is agreed as follows: 1. GRANT OF EASEMENT. Grantor does hereby grant and convey to Grantee a perpetual, appurtenant, and non - exclusive easement for the purpose of constructing, improving, repairing and maintaining a gas line for use in carrying the flow of gas over, under and across that portion of the Subject Property on which proposed Indiana Avenue is to be constructed pursuant to any 1 final platting of the Subject Property. This easement shall become effective only upon approval of a final plat of the Subject Property which includes, as a condition of said plat, an extension of Indiana Avenue across the Subject Property. 2. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. Grantee shall at all times exercise its rights herein in accordance with the requirements of all applicable statutes, orders, rules and regulations of any public authority having jurisdiction. 3. APPROVAL BY GRANTOR. Prior to any construction, alteration or replacement or any other substantial activity by Grantee upon the portion of the Subject Property which is subject to this easement, a notification and plans for the same shall be submitted in writing to Grantor by Grantee, and no such work by Grantee shall be commenced without Grantor's prior written approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld/ PROVIDED HOWEVER, that in the event of an emergency requiring immediate action by Grantee for the protection of its facilities or other persons or property, Grantee may take such action upon such notice to Grantor as is reasonable under the circumstances. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to impose any duty or obligation upon Grantor to determine the adequacy or sufficiency of Grantee's plans. 4. GRANTEE'S USE AND ACTIVITIES. Grantee shall exercise its rights under this Agreement so as to minimize and avoid, if reasonably possible, any interference with Grantor's use of the Subject Property for its customary and usual business purposes, recognizing, in particular, that a large portion of the Subject Property is intended to be used as a shopping center. Grantee shall at all times conduct its activities on the Subject Property so as to not interfere with, obstruct or endanger the Grantor's operations or facilities, or those of any successor in interest to Grantor to any portion of the Subject Property. If, at any time, Grantor or its successor, such as Spokane County, shall cause or require the improvement of any County road, highway or right -of -way wherein Grantee maintains facilities subject to this franchise, by grading or regrading, planking or paving the same, changing the grade, altering, changing, repairing or relocating the same or by constructing drainage or sanitary sewer facilities, the Grantee upon written notice from the Grantor, or • Spokane County shall, with all convenient speed, change the location or readjust the elevation of its system and other facilities so that the same shall not interfere with such work and so that such lines and facilities shall conform to such new grades or routes as may be established. The relocation of Grantee's facilities shall be at the sole expense of Grantee where the improvements or changes to the County road, highway or right -of -way benefit the public at large. To the extent the benefit of such improvements inures to adjacent property owners or developers, as determined by the County Engineer, the costs of relocation may be charged, by Grantee, to such owners or developers; accordingly, the County shall not authorize any r improvement or change until the owner or developer has agreed to pay Grantee for the costs of relocation. The County shall in no way be held liable for any damages to said Grantee that may occur by reason of any of the County's improvements, changes or works above enumerated, except for damage caused by negligence of the County's employees or agents. The construction, operation and maintenance of the Grantee's system authorized by this Agreement shall not preclude the Grantor or its successors, its agents, or its contractors from blasting, grading, excavating, or doing other necessary roadwork contiguous to the said lines and facilities of the Grantee, providing that the Grantee shall be given not less than five (5) days notice of said blasting in order that the Grantee may protect its lines and facilities; provided further, that in the event of an emergency as determined by the County Engineer, the Grantee shall be given forty -eight (48) hours notice. 5. TITLE. The rights granted herein are subject to permits, leases, licenses and easements, if any, heretofore granted by Grantor affecting the property subject to this Agreement. Grantor does not warrant title to its property and shall not be liable for defects thereto or failure thereof. 6. ASSIGNMENT. Grantee shall not assign its rights hereunder without the prior written consent of Grantor, which consent shall be unreasonably withheld. 7. SUCCESSORS. Subject to the preceding paragraph, the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns, and this Easement Agreement is specifically intended to run with the land. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above - written. GRANTOR GRANTEE R.A. Ranson Company, Inc. Inland Empire Paper Company By: By: President Its STATE OF WASHINGTON ) as. County of Spokane On this day of September, 1989, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared R.A. Hanson, to me known to be the President of R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE DATE: September 19 , 1988 TO: County Engineers: Utilities: Health District: Building & Safety FROM: DOUGLAS S "DAMS Subdivision Administrator SUBJECT: Extension of Time The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached request for an Extension of Time to finalize the plat of Sullivan Park Center. If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should be made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to us by September 30th, 1988. Thank you. DSA:jp Enclosure PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 PE- 1504 -85 SIII1IVAN PARK CFNTFR P / Jove: ,JExr za CA5T .4DP,775ti o c fq F r0 Coves ='1 5,,voe, # 7 co--tent 27, / 9p4 gel Z e i sq -P,Q2zt .4Ael at= ea i -'ry to�i� /SSie�trGS - /,a v6 s is Z6int ,%sskk2i Can, Kewacy `I ,,-' . Ve 6 ee'el 69-.0-20 o _ JZ4 2-ly2,/� Soo- . . S / -4-c -e . ae - #t - o—' razz-6 P s re Pno 1Pa s,4--( o , ✓ � sr s/� . iv& . OF ✓ 'c se•drS. Et/ /E' /Lio,cov To 01 Al — A_ - rrte- ey — (20G6 -s CICMSS.r Y Rya Y, OI'C -)t', M e sV4-2 tai — / ejv - r n c — annP / ,S / /vDJs / %n,r Gcw &C/4C /VDT , p 211 0 9?-i-AZE To 64-4ve . !--C Coot#4L_ _3/40P co rct4 cV t /2 -C /r✓TC'LU -I-/ - 6e N / / [.E "fur .2 )%., LCs , t Gal L-L cPe-* re A T 1 eVEL. P DN C Rc &J« ay S ere o vG`U` 0 As _ 8v a , . &d Cass-.' — /fo / N, Sat c,s.- t0 . — (,) e N • - S/ne _ o F S e g4A.A -7.., n-' _St (--(-)4/40 Pout , - A%uT _ .CUP. 1ITV 6 F F-e o Se _cts cticsieu-n.cy - e,✓ L/v'v/2ol w tiff y- A ^J P . Pu 17_e" - - Cart JJ $ 456 C/aa - T6. - w,c1 774-/ P ✓LOPoSp��, _ / vo r A-Pe sL ✓Ao-9c -SLY �'w rec TAD. 2. CZs . hror ccv e . - !JP v Or P UCL S Y Coy-. , Ct 1.oeeo StN cc (9O M A 5 r a- 'Rad o l7oicgyv 1 f4D D 4 .-G a S 5 GAL!) Li FE- 1- � 4✓/ Derel_oiP,+l ✓Luis Sc. 5. Ps-tit/6R- iS ca. tit, or= S.bo,ey.✓E nosy, 44D .St ou4.0 yo %. Ic M,a€ta) (At 6, CAvv/.v -✓_ trL d £lio4o )Rens.v'r gOPC6_ o,✓ OPPo&rc .. ssioe or- wit -'stS _ Su lfa[ . PM1076 .T 11.44)6 i N pcyyr.. ,PlAel fCs _ r1 � os o F _ — Rua MIUc2: / /Z W, LLB - x - 0.0 N07 ,t/on, za) z H-c vi / _ *EKE . w ,T6 r Aim wiles (2411W vv con_pN -r G4T eitionadr Fsd2 New k.,erszc .g RIc.44N.4) Kin-64A). Iot iv, PcA2A 2 -0 - )9-0 Auso A? (4 . NV re Fr- 0 aF IT go e 1 ?5 (4- 6MU ^l0 - ...l s 3 No - Fe ces 11.- /9 0 , ®Pf a . m — e s - pito.J'EC /'no .4-L.- T rn R o c 0 2.$ . - £ , / 6 2 . . / 8 . - EX PELT" o!J 73n [ A4-t r Qr4-0S Csw PiX---c.P Aio.LoGiCALs ✓2vG'YS - Coe Ingaesur. 4 Po d.0 Tura! � ,t/o r 00 _ nrt-F P „ sCi 27? -raj p 5 C/pc$ v6 . t. -t Kiw 477M S yt5rcret- c.'c . SuE-Fet,.0 Ulf c cCC PCW R_ts - PQ's Ne'"°SD .t Sl =to2. (f.Jtl-trf fr t(3r Al/ ati2-01, McLey , ¶ pai— ✓ca P-1gcL p•l d E , . . G° itt- CoDX. ABotlT 1540 ffigVCyo1 T u L. FAH 4,,, 0ei) 'Li cate t Q5 - tor . t -.JC-s But L .4—'D f/ .S✓ % 1( AspeEA Cam.✓ Tor 51, CLT $z- vr or= S,4oP -Ce'r& /a?ovo4*U, /1-A✓NA S t s I cH °"-6 /-/ t/ES O FF O F 84 6 _ v P /nl 7 .4 — _ Av D Le o rr Y7 -#1s N .. Ai ( 2i.A L. 5 fix} 7G S €P '. I _ t 5 - --t Tows W\PW_ Mason 4,anraoa/s dvg-eD Ta BE 759E5P ee Au-- ,2Erov p+6vc /Z . 1 0 P /Y}4 App U l/ 1 /�Jsnc- Is G. Si G<, , 1 i . / " S7/L! / s R/O Ag e ._ J tJs n F/ P_ 1toRba4 -C. . /etue2 4 ^ . « s y s r c n - I ✓cw s cx sivC, _ P / 3 7 N_o _ 4 e')✓To-„/ o r' Dtc s- S Te'2,0s4w Z. s CE TS is • pc1tccvr ,2 titdet.. _ rners: -/ /,L 44, _ rnP4 MUST L q-er C3.® /war." 6 .-$k 6P. CZP . - 17 244 't = FiG t _ i o -w� 1..J4eeL etc, - tfr...2:4c s it/cco 946 a e h w t - t � T 41-800 7 o r /•Y, dei < <s o id e ��,� oTI -tE.L Cam: T c2_— state 3 H 7 Fr 5 zes -.N t ✓'atC2 Po LW i �u .J , 2-0B — w _ So % z- o F,_ . a'r 6 ST, GI- L. -. / S a % %a ill &ue5 4 54 4" � 4 OOc rr r -'ate _�, / pG12e5 ,JeePe D Fat 4" -p c Oeefl I- 4 - /U Gomel t arJ - r, TA 5'TOr>wi 4✓7176C The A-t> 0--) D — cif> &t1 t D e 'CZ_ Ca) DL o^-) Ao pED - t /Arc uiate / /x264 Raa As _ ,S_Pec./ C[ c. Grr✓Dr7lay./4. 45 C139 . - . ,mss 23, 14 4" m,4>. ?� Stan , 33, _ A _ ca -,-'o. SC7.41C2 - 4- - 2 co.p 77 - 64../ • __35' , 3(0 SQD■ssL p4J c gY_Th4-4y , . _ v c , -%s Pis' tA) 779 FFl T, P,e- . .ate. sa Pam. Pouzdzcr tS AlItccrl t N o ce PM. 7' S oft.44F7 c&rs l Esr 51.4P 9 1;14o,E . 2. _ _ 0,8 r, t c_ES . - rep, APPn a c.14 L 1 4P. G Ja4 244 — e.ide o r SEW/cc Q et_ _ }=., C ?. _ ' _ . a SS 3 auc'sr 5 pM - Pe AK. sA- /s ts?.AFFIC, Ga ka,4 -t ot.J F (Co J 2 GS c r4or C . ? S ) F V Dud r (O %, rn'cw 3 S 1_S._ TNssJ N ricLs Loh FA-1 Lc5 W - 4 c _ W / { ,q-c1 1�." .t C=3 C J0 1,4 v «`4.5u113 2ce1.0,4 ._- 3 .--- c09 . 9_ . .*J D. 07 c VWO a"r 0J S, 1k Dr;U L r g24A.J . e /f 2-L G 4uC L eGA -t. aJ 5rao 3 P re.,upin/4 �- Lam o if 4 -O J u s 64 m . co NS/ De(� 4- j1 -t..T -D. * - i c (/ Ca 2. S'�A'tn.r w t-et Vt( (-Art-CS ou✓t saa Aid nv 3 4. O CY No! OC /mil Nd ,4c.77o —' T ell - r- - . J j.. X4 f?/lare es) C2-0 A 0-ionecte � c. . E2d2.t ts . o -• 0 8i'/.Fes oho i 4DE 61.41"T"r. /0 TM tnete. ( mz J R-o,-J ort' ? � 3� �,�a ` _ p. 33 Da-AFT RuN o FF a . Reps I . _ sAVS di-, uc-i-1 eC,0 l 0 el ° ` C co s c scracr7m y cfzl Tic.Ac_ 1i24 9C c9 o a 1P-ct)r5t 7 p , USE /-t/ G 4E2_ 5779,--09171-47. I.�s s N.c - -,✓.. NoT - _ 0-4- gE4cra T74- o,r6,M -roc. _ , P Gc - E 2Y'STS . - - - Aft A-ci lc,' Ac, c ✓CS NEB Lnc.ran &p, 0 Cc a. Ivor. (-uzu.)ea r J I ., ?rzc r.. l -Ma- i 6r/o )IC) -. C?--edas)Ees' 1?was -aC.. AVPRaG Sir V ova-Ccenc,( LGtk DeC % y a l Q.-d es"%S Pte- Jj 1; o TOW," g4 4.49,7<ro-i 2-ewe 0,4446 / - �/va - - /e`c.< "1e<ry R (.)(G!L- SI on PSoN -2'M- iN9Mc` 8 - - ? i i o . )e c r . S r4?TcD__ 0.0. 'v -_/6l3 - - sent/ y._ / " e6r1). r� _ l Cn _s- /mss- - -- - - Dcretri«!er- ,v- €crs 0 _ ReesA4soklektr —__ -- ._ -- -- 7s` c opies _ aF r PP10 0✓�/- ._ P.4 E . - acres 1983 _ — rh re, flies _Sa-c/a / - ePt. s ° -or - ?/eb' s cs✓ /r #/_Coupry at42s. sr4A l0 I0d7i5_ , _,_ ec f r ✓ _ - u ) _04,_ c r s — /-02, - -'vela - c a — o _ - - P o e ' P i t o _ P o s i e r t _ _ Due- a - To -_ eta FF1G — = roe.!/ '%.o _mat_ __?=072 O TL wis _ 'TWPS + -.L pMunek/ -s _11-1-e6e t F h . E c _ e - r - _ _ S _ P e - c - LA) co L D ae Pe i ( CD AT -_ _T_Tur`" -eis Gere2A; 0..1 cef? / � L,�-s - __ e evs Lur L A_G_ -p7 S ° fry _ - , S exist? e✓ _ 2d r2 s — 5 /At - PtiPS_ aS n4.5 an _ 0 pr. c c u e ma c c- 0 r - rr - &e . an) Otj lo+J c A- P et/ E.S T Atte. (Nt/8 1i3 w i �-F S - cagre ) AYs - /picc ADO T - °-S - - 0v ft-A s O l c.- ,0„) ova_ - - TN- - 9"`%i 4 »- y - _Ain_ pot w?iosQ p+zojccno,JS_ ..bow _ __ t - .5177 4c2-1, 5 w ezt— P �tuC- _5 1./1 PSe 0l i /,ti_02c_1 -fps acoy Rrv'oi a - - - � veS> . s cdt4 / t/ &DRD 410 - or /uSDoT - - SPoarsen__ s t✓��- - -UL D _aNS�Luc!!e�, - t) ._!n/_ _/ _216 o f / —5 - - El:t_t?- 7(- _ ciza_c$7 .1.%‘, - - _ oa e)caam_g.g-r� oaf ,63 V/ 5 /yllue.._ -- - - 5:P o'!Sift fed f( -L e rn_PL' wi 20 &__carped./ -eST., -- btko 'RASS _ _ S1aLT CA-4E Kate±, � 2>G� wvc's 2 C oN50C_r'+ -rJC eYS a_2_!_tc_Ges- eaC..0 -, a1-S _ - Co,. pLE t_ ?"4" ta Y re\pe. -t-.7 S'cZi -, 1?2c3`5 T V/ . _ 7� �rf` � N 0- mo w± e115Tdi+ Re-^ ✓64'o _ _, cpM eD I P s r — T 4 u.9-dr 2 cerin-v6 /•✓ra T' 4 _ R--_ h n t 4P —04i_000 Dc _ e c- p-to pas _ Md -P4sFC 2 €- _ ,zo =ol _/ems R4 d ersw. G— C,sfruhi Ie. - A- CC S- Q SuLUr.4" /2crt,O. —.. Pe -aJ ccT _ ces/6,J_ DES . M E y 5 Go to_e _ - -- SvPPOL` S $EW_CR. 4FSZ_?Ltwcr %ar-! _ - -- - _Says - - p✓ccesS _ g at% RJzS - E. Rte M A Da Oe. A -ooh /sic_ L9C4as s_ F?-v_ _Co 27 _ _ R?z __MA)/ " aue-sT OAJS Swot✓ .srop reana r ucvta1 _ _ - - SE P f\ - �� c-i C ) 4ts'b 1 — 5.- CA-7y _5 ps -moo -- ` G!r^^E 4 Y_ S _ . 1 7 1 _ er/B c1G . . - _ _ Nom}{ -)t?G e- D _ A Bo _rivnFE cs avES e,&25'_ ( ues wt _ & & . - - - - - - -- - -- c 6-y s << cc 0 PPas7 « .es ,at& rr -c acnne -i eurs_ _ F a , / f _ ; 0 0 1 - 4 , 0 " 4�E VICTOR H. BISHOP P.E. President Mr. Tom P. May 1120 Paulson Building Spokane, WA 99210 Re: Sullivan Park Center, Spokane, WA Dear Mr. May: -C ILt- 5CJ G -ED AT ,R Meitenl TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC ?L 2101 - 112th AVENUE N.E, SUITE 110 - BELLEVUE WASHINGTON 98004 TELEPHONE 455-5320 AREA CODE 206 January 23, 1986 RECEIVED JAN 2 7 1986 COUNTY CO)AM ! flwFRS Per your request I have reviewed several of the environmen- tal documents for the Sullivan Park Center, including: 1) Amended Notice of Public Hearing, dated December 24, 1985 2) Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Findings and Order, dated November 19, 1985 3) Final Addendum to Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Sullivan Park Center, dated September 20, 1985 4) Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Sullivan Park Center, dated June 21, 1985 5) Master Plan for Development for Sullivan Park Center, dated September, 1985 6) Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Sullivan Park Center, Volume 1, dated September, 1980 7) Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Volume 2, Technical Appendix, dated September 16, 1980. After a brief review of these various documents, I have come to conclusions with respect to the adequacy of these documents in three basic areas. The three areas are: One, The ability of the proposed transportation improvements on Interstate 90 to meet the Federal Highway Administration design standards for Interstate highways. Two, an apparent error in the application of standard Trip Generation data resulting in understating the potential traf- fic congestion. Three, confusion within County Engineering Department Condition of Approval number nine of the Hearing Examiner Committee's Findings and Order dated November 19, 1985. I FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION STANDARDS ON INTERSTATE HIGHWAYS The draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS) and the Conditions of Approval, both by the County Engineer Department and the Washington State Department of Transportation all clearly indicate that substantial revisions to the Interstate highway system (I -90) and its ramps and inter- changes will be required for the first and second phases of Mr. Tom P. May Sullivan Park Center Jan. 23, 1986 Page 2 this project. In addition, the third phase will require addition- al County road connections to the proposed new interchange at Evergreen Avenue. Appendix A of the DSEIS contains two letters from the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) dated June 21, 1984 and October 3, 1984. For phase 1 of the pro- ject, the WSDOT concurs that the "Slip Ramps" from the Sullivan Road interchange westbound on /off -ramps to Indiana Avenue will be required to maintain satisfactory traffic operations. The WSDOT also specifically indicates that the WSDOT does not have the fi- nal say on the acceptability of these ramps. Rather, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is the final reviewing agency with respect to design standards for interstate highways. The second paragraph of page 2 of the October 3, 1984 letter from Walter R. Horning, District Administrator of WSDOT to Mike Teramoto specif- ically addresses the FHWA approval requirement. The sketches of Figure 7 and . 8 of the DSEIS show schematical- ly how these crucial "Slip ramps" might work for the Phase 1 traf- fic projections. The FHWA will require that these schematic sketches be converted to specific hardline proposed drawings with scale dimensions that meet all design standards for the inter- state highway system. While the WSDOT has approved the concept in general, they have not approved the specific design as they do not have that authority until FHWA review and approval. It is very possible that substantial changes to the alignment of the slip ramps will be required when all FHWA and WSDOT design stan- dards are applied to these ramps. This could dramatically affect the required right -of -way for the ramps and the spacing of the slip ramps with respect to Sullivan Road. All references in the Conditions of Approval where the WSDOT is identified with the in- terstate highway system should include the FHWA approval in the language. As the DSEIS, WSDOT and the Conditions of Approval all agree that the interchange modifications are required for Phase 1, no action of construction should start until the FHWA has approved the modified Sullivan Road interchange plan with the slip ramps. Phase 2 of the project requires the construction of the new Evergreen Interchange on Interstate 90. The WSDOT and FHWA have had a long- standing basic guideline that interchanges on the in- terstate highway system should be spaced no closer than one mile apart. The distance between Pines Road and Sullivan Road is ap- proximately 1.9 miles. The proposed location of the Evergreen Interchange is .8 miles west of the Sullivan Road interchange. Mr. Tom P. May Sullivan Park Center Jan. 23, 1986 Page 3 This appears to violate the guideline as established by WSDOT and FHWA for spacing of interstate highway interchanges. This spac- ing guideline is established specifically to avoid the problem of weaving traffic between on -and off -ramps at adjacent inter- changes. It is highly desirable to let one interchange traffic get totally straightened out before the next interchange is upon them, and the FHWA has strenuously adhered to these standards ex- cept in Central Business Districts of major cities. The slip ramp from Indiana Avenue to the westbound on -ramp required for Phase 1 of this project will of necessity have the effect of lengthening the on -ramp requirements by 500 to 1000 feet to accommodate the merging and weaving traffic associated with the slip ramp before merging with the westbound through lanes on the freeway. This lengthening of the westbound on -ramp from Sullivan Road will have the effect of making the next inter- change to the west closer than normal because of the length of the ramp. Again referring to the October 3, 1984 WSDOT letter in Appendix A of the DSEIS, it is important to remember that while WSDOT will recommend approval of the second access point to serve the area, they do not have the final authority; rather FHWA has the final authority and approvals of the second phase must be withheld until FHWA approves of the interstate highway modifica- tions required by the slip ramps and the Evergreen Interchange. This concept must be included in the Conditions of Approval for the project. It is clear from the DSEIS that without approval of the Evergreen Interchange, Phase 2 of the project cannot proceed with- out drastic effect on the transportation system and should be denied. II TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Reference is made t� several items in the DSEIS including Table I page 4, the trip generation section and Table IV on page 21, Capacity Analysis section and Table V on page 26, Table VI on page 29, Table VII on page 30, and the Traffic Volume Projections of Appendix B. Also, pages 14 and 15 of the September, 1985 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. Mr. Tom P. May Sullivan Park Center Jan. 23, 1986 Page 4 Trip generation for major projects is determined on a daily basis and on a PM peak hour basis as is done for this project. The data for the PM peak hour is the primary analysis data for evaluating the arterial street system and its intersections. The evaluation of the intersections and streets is identified as the "Capacity Analysis" evaluation. This evaluation results in iden- tification of the "Level of Service" of intersections. Level of Service D has been used in these reports as an acceptable level of service whereas level of service E has been determined to be unacceptable. The breaking point between level of service D and E is a volume to capacity (V /C) ratio of .90. A value between .80 and .89 is level of service D and a value between .90 and 1.0 is level of service E. The levels of service Tables V, VI, VII, of the DSEIS and on page 15 of the Final SEIS all indicate that the intersection of Sullivan Road and Indiana Avenue is projected to operate with a V/C ratio of .89, which is identified as level of service D. (Page 15 of the FSEIS carries the V/C ratio one decimal point further and indicates that with Phase 1 (with Industrial) the Sullivan Road at Indiana intersection will oper- ate at .883.) Please note that in all cases this intersection is one hundredth of a point (.01) away from an unacceptable level of service E operation at this critical intersection. Paragraph 2 of page 21 of the DSEIS identifies future gener- ation of 1200 outbound trips in the PM peak for the alternative to Phase 1. The derivation of this number is not shown in the DSEIS but is shown on page 14 of the Final SEIS. A review of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) document Trip Generation - An Informational Report (Third Edition) together with pages 16 through 19 of a complementary report identified as Using the ITE Trip Generation Report, July, 1984 by Carl H. Buttke, P.E., which is an official document of ITE, indicates that the ITE trip generation data for the PM peak period has been misapplied for the regional center as identified in the table on page 14 of the Final SEIS. When properly applied, the ITE trip generation report would change the number of trips in the PM peak for in and out of both the office alternative Phase 1 and the industrial /office alterna- tive Phase 1 from 922 trips to 1140 trips during the peak hour, or a 20 percent increase in the regional center PM peak in and out trips. This would make the value on page 21 of the DSEIS of 1200 trips increase to 1360 trips. These site generated traffic volumes are the most significant traffic volumes at the intersec- tion of Indiana Ave. and Sullivan Road as shown on the traffic f 6 Mr. Tom P. May Sullivan Park Center Jan. 23, 1986 Page 5 projection figures in Appendix B. For instance, in Phase 1 the northbound left- turning volume from Sullivan Road to Indiana Avenue increases from twenty (20) vehicles per hour without the project to five hundred eighty -three (583) vehicles per hour with the project. Similarly the eastbound left -turn from Indiana Ave. to northbound Sullivan Road increases from 6 to 170 trips respectively without and with the project. These are critical movements when evaluating the level of service for an intersection such as this one. An increase in the projected traffic volumes in the range of ten to twenty percent will significantly affect the capacity calculations and push this critical intersection into level of service E operation for both of the alternative Phase 1 development scenarios and for the Phase 2 and 3 scenarios. Given the above rationale of trip generation and capacity analysis, it is clear that the first phase of the project should be denied until: 1) The FHWA has approved the slip ramp concept, and 2) a reevaluation of the traffic projections and traffic anal- ysis can show that a level of service D or better operation can be attained at the intersection of Sullivan Road and Indiana Avenue. III COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT CONDITION OF APPROVAL - NUMBER 9 This condition of approval is an extremely important condi- tion and is extremely vague and confusing. All references to State Highway Department should be revised to Washington State Department of Transportation. In addition, the first sentence re- fers to "The proposed state highway /county road intersection" without identifying which intersection this is. Is this the in- tersection of Sullivan Road at I -90 which is a "interchange" or is this another WSDOT /County Road intersection? The County Engineer Department Condition of Approval Number 38, paragraph 3 refers to condition number 9 and is talking about the upgrade of an intersection at Pines and Indiana. Pines Road south of I -90 is State Highway 27 and could be construed to be the State Highway /County Road intersection referred to in condition 9, yet nowhere in the DSEIS or these other conditions is improvements at Pine Road and Indiana identified or traffic volumes shown for that intersection. Condition of Approval number 9 refers to a "design proposal" for the intersection (Interchange ?). County Engineer Conditions of Approval numbers 33, 34, 43, 45 and 46 all refer to a "Design Report" which is an officially recognized document by the WSDOT and FHWA and refers to the Evergreen Interchange in those Mr. Tom P. May Sullivan Park Center Jan. 23, 1986 Page 6 conditions of approval. Is the "design proposal" of Condition 9 the same Design Report? If so, it should be more specific and say so. Condition 9 appears to be the place where the applicant is required to prepare the Design Report at his cost. If that is not the case and Condition 9 is really referring to Pines Road and Indiana Avenue, then it does not appear that the Conditions of Approval require the applicant to bear the cost of the Sullivan Road interchange revisions or the Evergreen interchange Design Reports. This should be cleared up, including the refer- ence to Pines Road and Indiana Avenue at Condition of Approval number 38. It is my opinion that the Preliminary Subdivision and Zone Reclassification for the Sullivan Park Center should be denied un- til the above items are adequately reviewed by the County and pro- visions made for the appropriate level of approval of interstate highway changes at the Federal Highway Administration level. Further, it is important to assure the County that this project will not result in unacceptable level of service E traffic oper- ations at the Sullivan Road intersection with Indiana Avenue. VHB /mb Enclosure Very truly yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC '✓ Victor H. Bishop, P.E., President �pF �i✓ Using the ITE Trip Generation Report Institute of Transportation Engineers 525 School Street, S.W., Suite 410 Washington, D.C. 20024 -2729 (202) 554-8050 PREPARED BY Carl H. Buttke, P.E., July 1984 16 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS is no measure of confidence of the average rates. In some cases, the average weekday vehicle trip end rates are plotted and in other cases, linear equations are provided. The Permanent Committee will attempt to clarify the area of confidence in the use of average rates. Limited Sample Size For some uses, the sample size of the rate data is very limited. The Permanent Committee published all of the collected data including rates from only one study. Therefore, the user must be cautioned to use the rates with care when the sample size is less than three studies. Notes have been printed on most rate tables where the sample size is less than three, cautioning the user to use the rates carefully. The sample size is always noted on the rate tables. Referring to Figure 3, second to last column titled, "Number of Studies" indicates the number of studies utilized to calculate the respective rate. The last column indicates the average size of the generator or independent variable for each of the studies. COMMON MISTAKES IN USE OF TRIP GENERATION REPORT The following describes the most common mis- takes made when using the Trip Generation Report. Use of Report as a Manual There appears to be an increasing misuse of Trip Generation by thinking of it as a manual and as the sole source of trip generation rates from which there can be no deviation. Communities have adopted or- dinances or requirements for traffic impact state- ments which require that the trip generation esti- mates must be based only on the rates contained in the Trip Generation Report and that no adjustments may be made to those rates. The Trip Generation Report was never intended to be used in this manner. The Permanent Committee attempted to guard against this misuse by writing a section in the report introduction called "Use of Report." It states that the report is intended to be a guide in estimating the number of trips which may be generated by a specific building or land use. It further states that one may wish to modify the gen- eration rates because of public transportation ser- vice, ridesharing, proximity to other developments, or because of special characteristics of the site and the surrounding area. The Trip Generation Report addresses the issues of adjusting the rates for various reasons which will be described in more detail later. Also, there are other sources of trip generation rate data which have not been obtained by the Per- manent Committee and therefore are not presented in Trip Generation. These data could have been col- lected since publication of Trip Generation, or could be specific to a certain community or development and should also be utilized to provide the best esti- mate of traffic impact. • To resolve this problem, it is recommended that local ordinances or requirements refer to Trip Gen- eration as a source of data, but not limit the data source to only the rates contained therein. Further- more, if the data sample is very limited in the Trip Generation Report, the transportation engineer should have the capability to collect additional rate data to increase the sample size on which the esti- mates will be based. Peak Hour Entering and Exiting Trips Not Adjusted One of the most common mistakes made when using Trip Generation is not to adjust the peak hour entering and exiting rates to equal the total peak hour rate. The failure to make this adjustment gen- erally will result in a low estimate of the peak hour entering and exiting site traffic. The recommended procedure for making this adjustment is described on page 13 of this monograph and on the first page of instructions in Trip Generation. Misuse of Variable Rates Another common mistake is made when calculat- ing the generation for a shopping center or office building which has variable rates. Often, the rates are obtained directly from one of the rate tables which contain only the average rates for the entire group size rather than obtaining the rates from the variable rate curve or by interpolating between rate tables for the appropriate size building. As an example, the trip generation will be calcu- lated the wrong way and the correct way for an office building containing 75,000 gross square feet of building space: COMMON MISTAKE Referring to the following rate table for General Office, Under 100,000 G.S.F., ITE Land Use Code 711, a common mistake is to use these rates directly, as follows: 24 Hour Two -Way Volume: 75 x 17.7 = 1,328 Vehicle Trip Ends A.M. Peak Hour Enter (7 - A.M.): 75 x 1.45 = 109 vehicle trips • SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use /Building Independent Type General Office, limier 100,000 G.S.F. ITE Land Use Code Area 711 Variable -Trips per 1»00 Grnas Square Feet of Rui 1 ding Average Trip Rate Maximum Rate Minimum Rate Correlation Coefficient Number of Studies Average Size of Independent VariablelStudy Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 17 7 28 8 8 2 20 5n 2 Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic A.M. Between 7 Enter 1. 1.90 1.28 3 24.3 Exit 0.25 0.80 0.15 3 24.3 Total 2.50 3.79 1.40 15 41.9 P.M. Between 4 and 6 Enter 0.19 0.70 0. 06 3 24.3 Exit 1 14 2. 6n n.74 3 24.3 Total • s i Peak Hour of Generator A.M. Enter 2 23 3 31 1 29 5 47.0 Exit 0.45 1.04 0 16 5 147 n Total 2 92 5 98 1 44 17 49 6 P.M. Enter Exit 1 88 3 1 9 0 42 5 47 n Total 2 84 _A 39 1 12 _ i _ Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends _ _113 . Peak Hour of Generator Enter Exit Total • 2 • • • Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends 1.2 7.3 0. 2 10 li Peak Hour of Generator Enter .6 Exit Total 0.18 0.37 0.06 5 58,A Source Numbers 5. 21, 54, 72. 88. 89,__92_. 98 100 ITE Technical Committee 6A -6 -Trip Generation Rates Date 1982 G.S.F. = Gross Square Feet of Building Area Figure 6. Summary of Trip Generation Rates: Land Use Code 711 USING THE TRIP GENERATION REPORT 17 • 18 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS A.M. Peak Hour Exit (7 -9 A.M.): 75 x 0.25 = 19 vehicle trips P.M. Peak Hour Enter (4 -6 P.M.): 75 x 0.19 = 14 vehicle trips P.M. Peak Hour Exit (4 -6 P.M.): 75 x 1.14 = 86 vehicle trips Notice that the rates were used directly from the rate table and were not adjusted to reflect a 75,000 gross square foot building and the peak hour enter- ing and exiting rates were not adjusted to equal the total. The general office building average weekday vehicle trip ends rate varies with size of building, as shown on Figure 4. The rates shown on the rate table for General Office, Under 100,000 G.S.F. are the weighted average for all buildings under 100,000 G.S.F. (Figure 6). The average rates reflect an aver- age size building of 50,200 G.S.F. as indicated in the last column under "Average Size of Independent Variable /Study." In this case, it is 50.2 thousand gross square feet. CORRECT METHOD: The correct method is as follows: Refer to Figure 4 and obtain the average weekday vehicle trip ends rate from the curve for a 75,000 G.S.F. Building. This rate is 16.2 AWDVTE / T.G.S.F. (T.G.S.F. = Thousand Gross Square Feet). 24 -Hour Two -Way Volume: 75 x 16.2 = 1,216 AWDVTE A.M. Peak Hour Enter (7 -9 A.M.): Obtain rate from rate table and correct for enter/ exit equal total and correct for size. Correct Enter Rate: 1.45 + (1.45 + 0.25) x 2.50 = 2.13 Correct Rate for Size: 2.13 x 16.2 + 17.7 = 1.95 Enter Volume: 75 x 1.95 = 146 vehicle trips A.M. Peak Hour Exit (7 -9 Alt): Correct Exit Rate: 0.25 + (1.45 + 0.25) x 2.50 = 0.37 Correct Rate for Size: 037 x 16.2 =17.7 =0.34 Exit Volume: 75 x 0.34 = 26 vehicle trips P.M. Peak Hour Enter (4 -6 P.M.): Correct Enter Rate: 0 =( +1.14)x2.82 =0.40 Correct for Size: 0 . 40 x16.2 =17.7 =0.37 Enter Volume: 75 x 0.37 = 28 vehicle trips P.M. Peak Hour Exit (4 -6 P.M.): Correct Exit Rate: 1.14 + (0.19 + 1.14) x 2.82 = 2.42 Correct for Size: 2.42 x 16.2 +17.7 =2.21 Exit Volume: 75 x 2.21 = 165 vehicle trips Notice the difference between the calculated trips using the incorrect method and using the correct method. For shopping centers, ITE Land Use Codes 820 to 828, the Trip Generation Report recommends that one interpolate by size of center among the appro- priate rate tables. Interpolating is recommended because a rate curve, as shown on Figure 5, was not suggested in Trip Generation. An example calcula. tion for shopping centers is shown in Section IV. Improper Adjustments for Effects of Alternative Modes A mistake is often made when adjusting trip rates from Trip Generation to reflect different transit usage or different vehicle occupancy. Often, the trip rates are adjusted across the board by a percentage to reflect a different modal split. For example, if the expected transit usage is to be 10 percent for employees at an office building, the in- correct method is to reduce all the rates by 10 per- cent. The correct method is to reduce only the home -based work (H.B.W.) trips by 10 percent. Example calculations for different building types are contained in Section IV. J 1 c % & 'Psi.' IS a - ^ to IV. Example Calculations This last section contains example calculations in- dicating the suggested methods for estimating trip generation for shopping centers and how to adjust for alternative modes. SHOPPING CENTERS (ITE Land Use Codes 820 -828) PROBLEM: Calculate the 24 -hour two-way vehicle trips for a typical weekday as well as the P.M. peak hour (4:30 to 5:30 P.M.) entering and exiting traffic for a 180,000 gross leasable square foot(G.L:S.F.) shop- ping center. SOLUTION: Refer to Trip Rate Tables for ITE Land Use Codes 822 and 823 (Figures 7 and 8). Check that peak hour entering and exiting rates equal total and adjust, if necessary. Determine rates for 180,000 G.L.S.F. shopping center by iwe_rnolatinn between vaga ra_ tes and avert scenter.of the two adjacent size categories In this case, the two adjacent size categories are for ITE Land Use Code 822, with an average size center of 149,000 G.L.S.F. and Code 823 with an average size center of 235,000 G.L.S.F. (Av- erage Size Independent Variable /Study for Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends). Determine 24 -Hour Two -Way Rate: 149 T.G.L.S.F. = 66.7 235 T.G.L.S.F. = 50.6 Therefore by interpolation: 180 T.G.L.S.F. = 60.9 (T.G.L.S.F. = Thousand Gross Leasable Square Feet) Determine P.M. Peak Hour (4 -6 P.M.) Rates: 1. Adjust entering and exiting trips ITE Land Use Code 822 Enter: 2.9 - (2.9 + 3.1) x 5.9 = 2.85 Exit: 3.1 + (2.9 + 3.1) x 5.9 = 3.05 ITE Land Use Code 823 Enter: 2.1 = (2.1 + 2.2) x 4.8 = 2.34 Exit: 2.2 = (2.1 + 2.2) x 4.8 = 2.46 2. Interpolation for fajta Rate 142.berTGLSF = 2.85 �-�}� 261 T.G.L.S.F. = 2.34 ft , 401 i,n-F OUT - 19 Therefore by interpolation: 180TGLSF = 2,M- 2.(o(o 3. Interpolation for Exiting Rate 14Z+43 T.G.L.S.F. = 3.05 24i 61- T.G.L.S.F. = 2.46 Therefore by interpolation: 180 T.G.L.S.F. - 2,86- 2.$4 Determine Driveway Volumes: 24 -Hour Two-Way Volume: 180 x 60.9 = 10,962 vehicle trip ends P.M. Peak Hour Enter: 180 x 2.66= 481 vehicle trips P.M. Peak Hour Ezt 180 x 2.81 .= $Frvehicle trips 611 Another calculation method for the P.M. peak hour trips, which is slightly faster but probably not quite as accurate, would be to calculate the peak hour entering and exiting rates as a ratio of the 24 -hour two -way rate for the Land Use Code Rate Table which best describes the shopping center and apply that same ratio to the new calculated 24 -hour rate. For example: The 180,000 G L S F center is ITE Land Use Code 822. The corrected P.M. peak hour rates as a ratio of the 24 -hour rate are as follows: Enter Ratio: L85_ 66.7 =0.43 Exit Ratio: 3.05 _ 66.7 = 0.46 P.M. Peak Hour Enter: 180 x 60.9 x 0A3 = 471 vs. 484 vehicle trips P.M. Peak Hour Exit: 180 x 60.9 x 0.46 = 504 vs. 515 vehicle trips The second method results in nearly the same number of trips and is slightly Tess time - consuming. The rationale behind this method is that the peaking characteristics of each category of shopping center would remain the same rather than interpolating between categories for the peaking characteristics. However, when at the borderline of size between categories, it would probably be better to interpo- late to avoid abrupt changes in peaking characteris- tics because of a very small change in size of center. • d 22 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS ADJUSTMENT FOR ALTERNATIVE MODES The adjustments for alternative modes primarily affect the home -based work (H.B.W.) trips. There- fore, the following example calculations will adjust the rates because of a change in the H.B.W. trip mode for residential, industrial, and office land uses. An understanding of these examples would then provide the technique for adjusting trips for other land uses. SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOUSING (ITE Land Use Code 210) PROBLEM: Calculate the 24 -hour two -way and A.M. (7 -9 A.M.) and P.M. (4 -6 P.M.) peak hour entering and exiting rates as a result of a 10 percent transit rider- ship and an average vehicle occupancy of 1.45 per- sons per vehicle for H.B.W. trips. Use dwelling unit as the independent variable. SOLUTION: Refer to Trip Rate Table for ITE Land Use Code 210 (Figure 9). Check that entering and exiting rates equal the total peak hour rates. Adjust the H.B.W. trip. The trip rate data have been calculated primarily from measurements at subdivisions where there was no transit service. The average H.B.W. trip ve- hicle occupancy is assumed to be 1.35 persons per vehicle. The H.B.W. vehicle trip ends are assumed to be 20 percent of the 24 -hour vehicle trip ends. 24 -Hour Trip Ends Rate Adjustment: H.B.W. Vehicle Trips: 10 x 0.2 = 2 vehicle trip ends /day Adjust for 10 percent transit usage: 2 x 0.9 = 1.8 vehicle trip ends /day Adjust for 1.45 persons per vehicle: 1.8 x 1.35 + 1.45 = 1.68 vehicle trip ends /day Total 24 -Hour Rate: 1.68 + 8.0 = 9.68 vehicle trip ends /day A.M. Peak Hour Rate: Enter: No adjustment, assume no work trips = 0.21 vehi- cle trips /D.U. Exit: Assume 90 percent of exit traffic for work pur- poses: 0.55 x 0.90 = 0.50 vehicle trips Adjust for transit: 0.50 x 0.9 = 0.45 vehicle trips Adjust for vehicle occupancy: 0.45 x 1.35 _ 1.45 = 0.42 vehicle trips Total Exit Rate: 0.42 + 0.05 = 0.47 vehicle trips /D.U. P.M. Peak Hour Rate: Enter: Assume 67 percent of entering trips are H.B.W.: 0.63 x 0.67 = 0.42 vehicle trips Adjust for transit: 0.42 x 0.9 = 0.38 Adjust for vehicle occupancy: 0.38x1.35 =1.45 =0.35 Total Enter Rate: 0.35 + (0.63 - 0.42) = 0.56 vehicle trips /D.U. Exit: Assume no work trips: 0.37 vehicle trips /D.U. Comparison of Rates: 24 -Hour Two -Way Rate A.M. Peak Hour Enter A.M. Peak Hour Exit P.M. Peak Hour Enter P.M. Peak Hour Exit INDUSTRIAL PARK (ITE Land Use Code 130) No With Adjust- Adjust - menu meats Change 10.0 9.68 - 3.2 0.21 0.21 0 0.55 0.47 -14.5 0.63 0.56 -11.1 0.37 0.37 0 PROBLEM: Calculate the 24 -hour two -way and A.M. (7 -9 A.M.) and P.M. (4 -6 P.M.) peak hour entering and exiting trips for 500,000 gross square feet of building space within an industrial park for 10 percent H.B.W. transit ridership and no change in vehicle occupancy. SOLUTION: Refer to Trip Rate Table for ITE Land Use Code 130 (Figure 10). Check entering and exiting peak hour rates to equal total and adjust rates. Assume no H.B.W. transit ridership in trip rate data. 24 - Hour Trip Ends Calculation: Average Rate = 7.00 AWDVTE /T.G.S.F. Assume: 2.0 employees per T.G.S.F. 5 percent absentee factor 1.1 employees per vehicle 5 percent other modes SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Independent Type Shonning Center 400,0110- 499,499G. ITE Land Use Code Area 82 5 Variable Trips 1,000 Gross Square Feet of Leasable Per Average Trip Rate Maximum Rate Minimum Rate Correlation Coefficient Number of Studies Average Size of Independent VariablelStudy Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 49.7 102 0 27 2 16 1 141 Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic A.M. Between 7 and 9 Enter 0.3 1 473 Exit 0.2 1 47'1 Total 0.9 1 4 P.M. Between 4 and 6 Enter 1 9 1 2473 Exit 1 q 1 473 Total Peak Hour of Generator A.M. Enter 2.0 1 454 Exit 1 1 154 Total 3 7 5 5 2 2 8 446 P.M. Enter 2 2 1 4 73 Tott 473 Total 72 94 3 =q s? 1,1 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends F1 4 Peak Hour of Generator Enter 2 4 ) 1173 4 73 Exit 2 8 1 Total F _ Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends 10 2 1 473 Peak Hour of Generator Enter 0 6 1 473 Exit 0 8 1 /173 Total 1 a 1 1173 Source Numbers 3, 13, 40, 1 19, 511, 78, 110 ITE Technical Committee 6A -6 —Trip Generation Rates Date • • : •- • 0 G.S.F. = Gross Square Feet of Leasable Area Caution, limited sample size, use carefully. SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use /Building Independent Type Shopping Center 500,000 - 999,999 G.s F ITE Land Use Code Area 826 Variable - Trips per 1 000 Gross Square Feet of Leasable Average Trip Rate Maximum Rate Minimum Rate Correlation Coefficient Number of Studies Average Size of Independent Variable /Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends .17 2 54.8 17.9 37 617 Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic A.M. Between 7 and 9 Enter 0.38 0.64 0.22 6 751 Exit 0 21 0 44 n 07 6 951 Total n 61 1 08 0 3n 6 751 P.M. Between 4 and 6 A.M. Enter __L_59 1 65 1 99 2 16 1 18 1 13 7 10 757 727 Exit Total Enter 12 1 4n 3 95 1 86 -2_ 31 1 11 in - 7 722 757 Peak Hour of Generator Exit 1 35 1 95 0 8 12 710 Total 2 5 U 3 2 2 06 1 95 1 36 6 7 75 757 P.M. Enter 1 68 Exit 1 81_ 2 41 1 18 12 110 Total 3 P3 5 5 ? 511 23.6 1 18 g5^ 710 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 1 15.3 70.4 Peak Hour of Generator Enter 2 30 3.66 3 22 1.0 ' 1 26 7 1 757 710 Exit 2.35 Total 1' A7 F AR 9 9^ in 7117 Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends 19.5 4.1 18 Peak Hour of Generator Enter 0.81 38.4 1.81 0. 20 7 710 757 Exit 1.22 2. 61 0.19 12 710 Total • • Source Numbers 65. 72. L 3. 5. 6. 13 14. 18. 22, 26, 49. 54, 59, 60 61, 64, 73. 77. 79. 99. 100. 110, 124 ITE Technical Committee 6A - 6 - Trip Generation Rates Date 1975. 1979. Rev. 1982 G.S.F. = Gross Square Feet of Leasable Area 0 to Ls N , 3 ,000 -PeZ 1-}!}5 E 1 G So,00 ua'c Pi445E 2- �� D iTio,"/a I 1 012/aoo-1 1 s,09ITcetiA 2 ■ 1 2-a FF r C v>n p 74-c ? S 3 1. Tl2 1 P.S /000 -Pt-z 2.3 TZr rP5 44 T � Ps 1 maw -raf pA y . o� 7 000 New Ti/'S Dyg 0,000 ADD( rrotJa L n E L-s T✓'-/ P S v/9 y .I 2,060 ,+DOITio4aC- fr 2, Rs OA V c,c&Y. SuLLrv4J Lo i R_iPS CA.F SULLIVAN PARK CENTER Liberty Lake Wilsey & Ham Figure PROPOSAL: Code SPOKANE COUNTY COURT ROUSE Lots 1 thru 15,19,20 Lots 21 thru 36 Lots 16 thru 18 Tracts A thru F (GA) Local Business (LB) Restricted Industrial ( Commercial (Comm.) Agricultural (Ag) • PLANNING DEPARTMENT .` 9ROAOWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Doug Adams, Subdivison Administrator DATE: November 26, 1985 SUBJECT: Hearing Examiner Committee Actions - November 15 and 21, 1985 On November 15, 1985, the Hearing Examiner Committee met at 9:00 a.m. for continuation hearing of one Subdivision, Sullivan Park Center. On November 21, 1985, the Hearing Examiner Committee met at 9:00 A.M. to consider one (1) Extension of Time, one (1) Short Plat Appeal and two (2) Preliminary Plat and Zone Reclassifications. The Hearing Examiner Committee took the below actions. If not appealed, these decisions are final ten (10) days after Findings and Order have been signed, which was November 19, 1985 for Sullivan Park Center and November 22, 1985. The Hearing Examiner Committee Board members were: Gary Anderberg, Chair- person, Kathy Carstens and Jane Myers. Continued Hearing for public testimony from October 24, 1985 Hearing. 9:00 a.m. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION, ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER ZE- 180 -78, Reclassify land presently zoned Restricted Industrial & Agricultural to the zoning schedule shown below as it relates to the preliminary plat map: Current Zoning Ordinance 1985 Adopted Zoning Community Business (8 -2) R -I) Industrial Park (I -1) Regional Business (B -3) General Agricultural Hearing Examiner Committee Actions - October 24, 1985 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION 4. PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER' ZE- 180 -78, Local Business, R -1, Commercial & Agricultural to B -2, B -3, I -1 & GA (Requested zoning will be in effect on effective date of revised Spokane County Zoning Code). Action: SPONSOR: 467 -0770 Hanson Properties, Inc. N. 8700 Crestline Spokane, WA 99207 - LOCATION: The center will be north of Interstate 90 on either side of the Sullivan Road interchange. The site southeast of the Spokane River occupies portions of Sections 10, 11, 12, 13 & 14 Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: INDUSTRIAL, within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. • PROPOSAL: A mixed -use development on a 226 - in Spokane County. Included are a 79 -acre 19 acres of other commercial use, 22 acres of industrial park, a 300 -room hotel and a roadways and open space. 1:30 P.M. (or as soon thereafter as possible) CHANGE OF CONDITIONS 5. PS- 1165 -77, EWELL ADDITION ZS- 202 -77, Agricultural to R -1 & R -2 SPONSOR: 448 -8024 Ed Ewell E 2017 59th Avenue Spokane, WA 99203 systems. Action: Approved 2 -0 _SURVEYOR/ENGINEER: (206) 454 -3250 . Wilsey & Ham 1980 - 112th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA .98004 • • acre site is being planned regional shopping center, of business park, 53 acres remaining 43 acres of Continued to November 15, 1985 at 9:00 a.m. due to lack of proper notification to adjoining property owners. _ SURVEYOR/ENGINEER: 838 -3810 Century West Engineering Corp. E. 429 3rd Avenue Spokane, WA 99202 LOCATION: Located at the northwest corner of 57th Avenue and Freya S treet in Section 3, Township 24N, Range 43 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: URBAN, within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. PROPOSAL: To modify preliminary plat Conditions of Approval #s6, 7 and 8 of the May 29, 1980 Staff Report, which requires provision for a public sewer system and to allow individual on -site sewage disposal Name: TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Appeal Fee - $75.00 Tom P. May, Lawyer for Miller, Morgan and Crossman,and Tom Rogers Today's Date Address: 1120 Paulsen Building Spokane, WA Home Phone: 747 -4701 Hearing Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed Title: Sullivan Park Center Preliminary Subdivision Number: PE 1504 -85 Date Signature: Signature of Zip Code: Business Phone: Zone Reclassification Number: ZE180 -78 /including all action 1978 to date of Hearing Examiner Committee Action De _ ler: e.Lit.z `� :" 111. :� Authorized Representative\_', Tom P. Address: 1120 0/ Paulsen Building, Spokane, YOUR REASONS FUR / APPS L / �(_e �icG. I �._ ( 4.4:4 �r : ' 1 C c {i - — �Cc �co- A 1/1.. �: k `—�'R /Ll C`+ '� C S' / I , 4 'L(; __ 1 I / ,,. l ( _•, �_( /-,• (See attached) / I c J OFFICE USE ONLY Copies to: Planning/11/2) Engineers Fee Received: Check_ Cash Receipt Number Hearing Date: ti Qi /L ,7 /9(f‘ 11/27/85 99201 455 -9080 RECEIVED NOV 2 7 1985 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEC 0 5 1985 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER :3/6/81;10/24/and 11/15 & 19/85 l X C t; . .(;( . < � . 72 - t4 7 i r, i Ma on / behalf of Tom Rogers and WA 99201 Miller,Morgan &Crossman c. RECEIVED Environmental Health /lip 'r RECEIVED NOV 2 �f 1985 ADDITIONAL REASONS FOR APPEAL OF COUNTYCOMW,71nNFRs ZE 180 -78 AND PE 1504 -85 Appellants, Grossman, Morgan and Miller � Tom hese rs additional reasons for appeal. This is intended as notice pleading, and the specific bases will be brought out at the hearing before the County Commissioners. 1. The environmental impact statements of of 1980, 1981 and 1985 are legally inadequate in their discussion of economic impact, social impacts, environmental impacts, including flora, fauna, sewer, traffic and specifically in regard to its failure to discuss the utilization of the riparian area by threatended and endangered species such as the bald eagle. The action taken in 1980, 1981 and 1985, is in direct violation of the due process and statutory rights of appellants, since they were not given legal notice, the zoning must be returned to Agricultural. The conditions regarding traffic and sewer are arbitrary and capricious. 2. In general appeallants appeal from all actions taken by the hearing examiner committee in regard to all phases of the plat approval, zone changes in 1981 and 1985, all actions under the State Environmental Policy Act in 1980, 1981 and 1985, including PUD approval and all other actions. CONCLUSION The appellants request.that the Spokane County Commissioners reverse the Hearing Examiner Committee action. The real estate in question should be returned to an agricultural zone. A new application and environmental checklist must be submitted. Failure to do so will constitute a violation of appellants' constitutional and statutory rights, and constitute a violation of 42 USC 1983, et. seq., and might subject the county to civil damages thereunder. Appellants hereby give notice of their intention to pursue such damages should the actions and facts so warrant. DATED this 27th day of November, 1985. (/ )AA :l To P. May Attorney for Appellants, Richard Morgan. Dennis and Ruby Miller, and Evie Crossman 1120 Paulsen Building Spokane, Washington 99201 a y Tom P. May Attorney at Law 1120 Paulsen Building Spokane, WA 99201 January 24, 1986 {LE C`cD An - ek 4 k dLi I - 20 S(0 kkA RECEIVED JAN 2 ' 7 1986 Steven A. BreoPOROQlt; M.. E.S. East 1018 Gordon Spokane, WA Dear Mr. May: At your request I have reviewed the EIS's and associated documents for the Sullivan Park Center. As you are aware I am well qualified to review the stormwater treatment proposals for the Center, as my Master of Science is in Environmental Science (Washington State University) with an emphasis in water quality. Also, I have worked specifically on stormwater problems in the Liberty Lake area for the past four years. I have completed my review of the stormwater . requirements for the Sullivan Park Center. There are some items to which the developer should be held as well as others which they should not be allowed to implement. Analysis of their stormwater requirements are on the accompanying sheet. I agree with most of the values for the Grass Percolation Areas (GPA) as stated in the DEIS. However, the section on commercial /light industrial area does not consider final developed area. This is important as it is necesary to insure adequate area for GPA to treat all future developed impervious area. Also, from the Draft Supplemental EIS an additional area (formerly set aside for drain fields) is now planned for development, hence this additional impervious area also must be considered. Overall, the plans appear to be deficient in providing GPA by 3.1 acres. These calculations are based upon a four -inch ponded depth of the first one -half inch of runoff from each impervious area. The Spokane County Stormwater Management Guidelines currently allow deeper depths than this on particular types of Tom P. May -2- January 24, 1986 developments. However, it is recommended that the developer be required to use this four -inch depth. The development is particularly dense and would be expected to produce large pollutant loads on the GPA's. A greater degree of treatment would be accomplished by spreading the runoff over a larger area, whereas a greater pollutant load could reach the aquifer if stormwater is deeply ponded in a GPA. It is stated several places in the Stormwater Runoff Control section of the EIS that runoff overflow from some GPA's could occur to the Spokane River. This should not be allowed. The river currently carries a high level of heavy metals and additional sources should not be allowed. It should be recognized that stormwater runoff is not just rainwater, but is composed of numerous noxious and toxic substances originating from automobiles and other human sources. The substances include heavy metals, such as lead, zinc, cadmium, nickel and tin, as well as asbestos and oils. A recently released addendum to the Stormwater Management Guidelines states that all roof drainage is to be treated in GPA's and not allowed to be discharged directly into drywells. The latter disposal method was suggested in the DEIS but this should not be allowed. Also, all roads must have the runoff treated in GPA's. While it is stated that there "is generally adequate [area] for GPA construction" for this purpose there are no figures to support this claim. A final point pertaining to stormwater controls, in the DEIS is a statement that Spokane County may perform the operation and maintenance of the CPA's. This is incorrect: it is the owner who must perform O &M to meet County regulations and specifications. Other points of concern follow: (1) There are proposals for two other shopping malls in the Spokane Valley. One mentioned in the DEIS at the SE corner of the intersection of Sullivan Road and I -90. Another, the Liberty Lake Mall, is located approximately five miles east of Sullivan Road at the intersection of Harvard Road and 1 -90 (this is about six minutes driving time on I -90). All of the proposals presumably draw from the same market area, and considering this, only one mall could likely be supported by this area. Such is stated in the DEIS. However, the DEIS does not consider the Liberty Lake Mall and its probable economic impact on the Sullivan Tom P. May -3_ January 24, 1986 Park Center proposal and only briefly discusses the first mentioned proposal. (2) Considering the proximity of this proposal to the Spokane River and Sullivan County Park, as well as its magnitude, it is likely to have an adverse impact on the recreation value of that reach of the Spokane River. The County Park and, shoreline along the reach and the river itself are all heavily used by water sports enthusiasts, among other, with the Sullivan Rapids being one of the best stretches of whitewater in Spokane County. This proposal will also have an adverse impact upon the use of the area by fauna and fowl, especially Bald Eagle, which can be found in the area. (3) There are several conditions imposed by the various Spokane County and State Departments which also must be addressed. (a) County Planning Department: 7. If the rail line is relocated along the riparian park it should not decrease the area of the park or be included as open space. (b) County Engineering Department: 9. Does the reference to "State Highway" mean Interstate 90? If so then I concur. If not, the sponsor should also be required to finance any construction and design of any traffic structures necessary to safely and smoothly move traffic to their site. 23. and 26. I recommend, as stated above, that a four -inch maximum depth be required for the stormwater disposal GPA. 33. I concur with the requirement for the sponsor to be responsible for all roadway and right -of -way improvements along the Sullivan Park corridor between I -90 and Sprague. This should be extended to any sewer and water improvements aong the corridor also required to serve the site. 35., 36., and 37. All construction and design of any road improvements and freeway interchanges should be financed by the sponsor. Tom P. May 4 January 24, 1986 45. All road and highway improvements for Phase III should be financed by the sponsor. (c) Washington State Department of Transportation: 2. There is no statement as to what conditions the WSDOT has imposed, only a mention that there are conditions. These should be stated. This covers all the points I could find in my review of the EIS and related documents. If you have any questions feel free to call. Sincerely, Stephen A. Breithaupt, M.S.E.S. Areas Stormwater Runoff Disposal Calculations for Grass Percolation Areas (GPA) Total Area (acres) 0 Impervious Area Required GPA ** (areas) (acres) East of Sullivan Rd. 43 21.5 2.7 2.7 Motel/ Commercial 25 12.5 1.6 1.5 Mali 67 67 8.4 8.4 Commercial/ Light Indus- trial West 31 15.5* 1,9 0.8 Total Areas from DEIS 166 116.5 14.6 12.4 Additional Area * ** 30. - 15.5 1 :9 196 131.5 16.5 - * Estimated future impervious area, assuming the whole area is developed. ** GPA = (Impervious Area) (0.5/12)1(4/12) * ** From the Draft Supplemental EIS. On -site sewage disposal will not be utilized, hence the drainfield area is to be developed. For these calculations the additional area is assumed to have 50% impervious area. cE� o SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE N ��ewe� FINDINGS & ORDER ce � avi DATE: November 19, 1985 RE: PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER ZE- 180 -78, Restricted Industrial to 8 -2, 8 -3, I -1 & GA (Requested zoning will he in effect on effective date of revised Spokane County Zoning Code). 1. That the proposal is a mixed -use development on a 226,acres site. Included are a 79 acre regional shopping center, 19 acres of other commercial use, 22 acres of business park, 53 acres of industrial park, a 300 room hotel and a remaining 43 acres of roadways and open space. The development will he accomplished through the subdivision of the property as shown on the applicant's site development plan of 42 lots, rezoning of the property consistent with the adopted 1986 Spokane County Zoning Code. The review of this project is further consistent with the site development plan review requirements established with the Restricted Industrial zoning of the property in 1981. The project sponsor has indicated that the full development of the site will take approximately 15 years to accomplish. 2. That the proposal is located north of Interstate 90 on either side of the Sullivan Road interchange. The site southeast of the Spokane River occupies portions of Sections 10, 11, 12, 13 & 14, Township 2511, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. 3. That the item has been properly advertised in accordance with state and local regulations. The Committee first took testimony for a scheduled hearing on October 24, 1985 at which time it was brought to the Committee's attention that approximately three property owners had not received personal mail notification of the proposal. The Committee continued the public hearing to November 15, 1985 to allow the sponsor to renotify all property owners within 400 ft. of the proposal and afforded all interested parties an opportunity to testify and express their concerns or objections to the proposal. A correction to the legal notice for the November 15, 1985 hearing was made to reflect that a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement had been prepared rather than the earlier notice which indicated a DNS had been issued for this project. 4. That the Hearing Examiner Committee spent two days considering public testimony on Sullivan Park Center. Public testimony regarding the project focused most attention upon the project's potential impact to existing wildlife in the Spokane River Ecosystem adjoining the property to the north and the adverse impacts of the high traffic volumes which will be generated from the project when it is fully developed. These impacts include noise, high exhaust, and inconvenience for area residents. Additional concerns considered by the Committee were that the proposed development was an unnecessary commercial development and could pose an adverse impact upon existing businesses on Sprague and elsewhere in the County. Findings & Order for PE- 1504 -85 (Cont'd) The Committee did receive testimony favorable to the project which indicated that this development would establish more jobs and create an enhanced economy for the Valley. That the Committee heard from the Board of Directors for The Walk In The Wild Zoo that they were generally in favor of the project in that it would enhance their exposure to the general public. 5. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Industrial and the proposal is consistent with the land uses identified in this category. 6. That the Committee finds the proposal is significantly buffered from most residential uses in the Valley in that to the south of the property lies the Interstate freeway and a natural ridgeline elevated above the freeway on the freeway's southern border. To the north of the site lies the Spokane River, the Kaiser Trentwood Works and further to the east the Spokane Industrial Park. Two areas which have some large lot residential development abutting the property were considered by the Committee. One area lies generally on the east side of the project, adjacent and easterly of Flora, the other area lies to the southwest of the project generally parallel to Indiana Avenue as it currently located. The Committee finds that these residential areas are deserving of protection through site - buffering and restrictions to the development which the sponsor has agreed to in his presentations. 7. That the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act, Chapter 43.21C RCW, WAC 197 -11 and the Spokane Environmental Ordinance, Title 11 of the Spokane County Code have been met and more particularly: a) By document issued January 8, 1985 by Wallis D. Hubbard, Planning Director, the Sullivan Park Center PEIS, Volumes 1 and 1 (9/80) and FEIS (2/81) are recognized as adopted by reference pursuant to WAC 197 -11- 600(4) and Sokane Environmental Ordinance 11.20.230. b) By document signed January 8, 1985 by Wallis D. Hubbard, Planning Director, a Determination of Significance. and Request for Comments and on scope of a Supplemental EIS was issued for modification to the original site plan, a preliminary plat and zone reclassifications. c) The above documents were circulated consistent with WAC 197 -11 -408 and public notice given consistent with WAC 197 -11 -510 and Spokane Environmental Ordinance 11.10.130. d) The Draft Supplemental EIS was scoped, drafted, issued, circulated, reviewed, revised and a Final Supplemental EIS issued ursuant to WAC 197 -11 and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance. e) The total original EIS, the Supplemental EIS and public comment given at the public hearing were noted and evaluated during the decision making process, including particularly extensive information regarding habitat impacts and effects upon flora and fauna, both directly and indirectly. Findings & Order for PE- 1504 -85 (Cont'd) 8. That unavoidable adverse impacts to secondary habitat and certain fauna are acknowledged as most likely a consequence of the originally improved R -I zoning and generalized site plan. Of particular note the Committee notes comment R18 on Page 172 of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for Sullivan Park Center prepared in 1981 which indicates that "it is unlikely that this edge would be maintained by following the 1 /8th mile criteria. One reason is that the site lies adjacent to a major freeway interchange within the Spokane Metropolitan Area and is readily accessible to a large number of people....A second and more important reason is that the site is under private ownership. Unless some government agency or citizens' group purchases the site, the present owner currently has the right to develop within the confines of the existing zoning, regardless of the Ecosystem boundaries." 9. That the revised plan has no greater adverse impacts than the existing approved project and most likely less in so far as: a) The riparian buffer area is larger than before and will become a part of the County's Spokane River riparian park system. b) The present proposal will be hooked to areawide sewering, thus eliminating the threat to the Aquifer from on -site sanitary waaste disposal. c) The present proposal will have less carbon monoxide pollution than projected by the original EIS. d) Slightly less traffic will be generated by the present proposal when compated to the existing approved proposal and the projected traffic laod will be handled more efficiently and effectively. e) The stormwaer runoff treatment by grass percolation areas has been proven to be acceptable treatment for protection of the Aquifer. 10. NOTE: Pursuant to WAC 197 -11- 680(5), Notice is hereby given that in conjunction with final approval of the above reference matter that: a). The time limit for commencing SEPA appeal of the approval of the above referenced matter, as provided by county ordinance, is 30 calendar days from final execution of the above Findings and Order. b). The time frame for appealing any SEPA issues with respect to the approval of the above referenced matter is 30 days after the execution of the above Findings and Order. c). The appeal of either the approval of the above referenced matter or any SEPA issues may be filed in the Spokane County Superior Court or a court of competent jurisdiction as provided by law. d). That decisions of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee become "Final" unless appealed within 10 days of the Committee written decision. e). Decisions rendered by the Board of County Commissioners are final when the Board signs its Findings and Order. Findings 8 Order for PE- 1504 -8S (Cont'd) 11. That the Committee notes that a project proposing similar uses as are currently under consideration was approved in March of 1981. That action rezoned the property to Restricted Industrial under the Zoning Ordinance for Spokane County which is still in effect. Although the previous action provided for a zone reclassification, the Committee finds the current proposal with its extensive landscaping provisions, road network improvements and provisions for public sewering to represent a substantial improvement over the project as previously considered. 12. The Committee notes the Spokane River Ecosystem is an important natural feature which includes open fields, grasslands and some ponderosa pine and is a wildlife habitat for various wildlife including bird species and small manna's. The Committee believes the riparian park proposal will bring about a continued habitat for some of these animals and will in all likelihood prevent some of the existing manmade degradation to the riveroank as was testified to by the Spokane County Parks Director. This degradation included substantial motorcycle and camping use along the riverbank as well as large amounts of trash left by persons using this area of the river. The project has been designed consistent with the state and local provisions of the Shorelines Management Act contained in RCW 90.58 and the local Shorelines Management Plan for Spokane County. 13. That the Committee finds the necessary utility and public improvements necessary to support this project have been provided for in County staff recommendations and have been agreed to by the sponsor. These improvements will cause the project to serve the general public health, safety and welfare. 14. The Committee understands that certain environmental changes will occur, but this was understood when the initial concept was approved in 1981. The Committee believes the benefits from this project will outweight any adverse impacts. 15. The Committee received a petition from area residents indicating only that they were opposed to Sullivan Park Center. The petition did not indicate why or how those who signed it felt the project would have an adverse impact to them. 16. Testimony was proposed to the Committee regarding the project sponsor's activities in other jurisdiction which the Committee declined to hear. The Committee felt such testimony was not relevant to the project currently being heard and the Committee had the necessary powers to insure that the project was properly conditioned and carried out in the public interest. Findings & Order for PE- 1504 -85 (Cont'd) CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the above findings concludes that the application of preliminary plat PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER and Zone Change ZE- 180 -78 from Restricted Industrial to B -2, B -3, I -1 & GA be APPROVED as conditioned in accordance with the Conditions of Approval attached hereto. VOTE: Unanimously approved Spokane County Subdivision Administrator THE HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTESTS TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION AND VOTE. a i rpe rs4n / ,vi- ( / /1 , . ,.( � 7 225 DATE IN REFERENCE TO THE ATTACHED FINDINGS & ORDER, THEOHEARINGUEXAMINERACOt ''MITTEE ADOPTS DIE FOLLOWING PLANNING REPORTC ThTTI0NS or APi' OVAL ATTACHED HERETO: 1. That the below listed conditions of all Departments and Agencies are binding upon the applicant, owner(s) of the property, heirs, successors or assigns. COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2. The preliminary plat of record approval is for the property legally described in the application for this proposal. 3. That the final plat(s) or phases be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record as legally described and advertised. However, the Subdivision Administrator may grant administrative approvals for divisions of land as provided by State law or local ordinance provided such divisions are consistent with the concept plan. 4. The Spokane County Subdivision Administrator shall review any proposed Final Plat to insure compliance with the Findings and Conditions of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. All final plats shall illustrate the 200 ft. setback from the ordinary high water mark pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act. 5. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for three (3) years to November 1, 1988. The applicant may request an Extension of Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 6. Upon filing the Final Plat the zone change of the Final Plat area shall be finalized and the existing Agricultural and Restricted Industrial zone classifications shall be in accordance with the zoning concept plan. 7. Prior to finalization of any part of the project, the existing Burlington Northern railroad lines through the western portion of the property will be either acquired and abandoned or relocated to the north of Indiana Avenue along the riparian park on the preliminary plat. 8. The applicant shall submit evidence that any structures located within the development are compatible with easement rights of any grantees of record, i.e., transmission lines prior to building permit release. 9. Prior to the finalization of Phase I, the general area shown as the riparian park shall be owned and maintained as a passive park by the Property Owners Association to be formed by the purchasers of lots within the project. Specific conditions, covenants and restrictions relating to maintenance and use of the park shall be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Zoning Administrator and filed with the Spokane County Auditor. Nothing within this condition shall prohibit the sponsor or subsequent owners from reaching agreements for the use or transfer of the riparian park to Spokane County. It is the intention of this condition to provide for regular maintenance of the passive park and retain it for public use. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) Planning Department (Cont'd) 10. That the planting and maintenance of the limited access areas shown as Open Space at the Sullivan Road /I -90 interchange and south of Indiana shall be provided by applicant or successors consistent with road landscaping requirements of Spokane County and the State of Washington. 11. The open space plantings and maintenance at the proposed Evergreen interchange shall be provided by the applicant or successor at the time the interchange is established. 12. The boulevard treatment landscaping for Indiana will be established or provided for as part of Phase I finalization by the applicant or successors. 13. That a Final Plat name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 14. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat, for distribution to the County Planning Department, Utilities Department, Engineering Department, Health District and applicable utility companies. Written approval of said utility easements by said utility companies must be received with the submittal of the final plat. 15. That a current certificate of title be furnished the County Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 16. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements unless the applicant(s)/sponsor(s) choose to file a notarized Waiver of Notice of Action with the Spokane County Planning Department. 17. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for lots to be developed prior to release of building permits. 18: That a plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection be approved by the water supplier, fire protection district, Spokane County Building Ji Safety Department and County health authorities. The agencies will certify on the WATER PLAN, prior to the filing of the final plat or any phase of the preliminary plat that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The WATER PLAN and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) Planning Department (Cont'd) The purveyor will also certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved WATER PLAN. The time schedule will provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat sponsor shall also sign the WATER PLAN to confirm the contractual arrangements or agreements. The final plat dedication will contain the following statement: "the public water system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building & Safety Department, and water purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 19. That no occupancy permit will be issued for any lot within the Final Plat until certified by a Washington State licensed engineer "that the water system has been installed pursuant the approved WATER PLAN for the Final Plat ", signed and stamped by said engineer. The certification may be in the form of a letter but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the WATER PLAN as a schematic map showing the "As Built" water system. 20. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 21. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the 1986 Spokane County Zoning Code. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 22. All mitigating measures set forth in the Final EIS be complied with and has been agreed to by the applicant. 23. That the project is subject to the Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone of the Spokane County Ordinance, which sets forth various measures for Aquifer protection; specifically, measures dealing with wastewater disposal, spill protection measures and stormwater runoff. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF.APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) Gettnty—'E- rrgi.neer Department (Cont'd) 24. The applicant shall provide sight- obscuring cyclone fencing 6 ft. in height along the southerly borders of Lots 1 through 9 of the preliminary plat and along the westerly edge of Lots 10 and 11 which adjoin properties not within the development. Additionally, the applicant shall provide a 6 ft. sight- obscuring fence along Lot 27 in the area which has been indicated by the applicant in a site plan amendment to be dedicated as non - developable. This area is approximately 500 ft. wide extending westerly of Flora Road. COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT 1. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to dedication of Right -of -Way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. That plans, profiles, and cross- sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval to construction and /or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed. Professional Civil Engineer. 3. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. 5. That appropriate provisions be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1 -ft. strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the final plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) 6. A statement must appear in the dedicatory language of the final plat: "that individual driveway access permits be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system." (77 A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to Sullivan Road. a A-..'o FLCinq ,240a -3. AboeD 07 8. That all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. �' �Wlc� HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 9. That the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal acceptable to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway- County Road intersection. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the responsibility of the sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. This shall include both Phase I and Phase II designs. 10. That the applicant shall coordinate with the Spokane County Parks and Recreation Department and the County Engineer's Department to provide a bicycle pathway through the northern portion of the project paralleling the Spokane River. This pathway would be provided in lieu of bicycle lanes along the proposed arterial streets. 11. That access to Evergreen Road from parcels 12, 15, 16 and 17 is prohibited. 12. That the applicant shall submit to the County Engineer an intersection plan for the Evergreen -local access road located south of Indiana. 13. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which established regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 14. That prior to finalization of the proposed plat, the applicant shall submit to the County Engineer for review and approval "Typical" Roadway Cross Sections for the following proposed roadways: a. Indiana Avenue Sullivan to the proposed Evergreen intersection. b. Indiana Avenue from the proposed Evergreen intersection to the connection with the existing Indiana Avenue at the west end of the proposal. c. Evergreen Road south of Indiana Avenue, between Indiana and the proposed Evergreen interchange. d. Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus. 15. The typical roadway cross section for the roadway which connects the proposed Evergreen Road with the proposed Indiana Avenue in the westerly portion of the plat shall be typical roadway section No. 1 access standard. 16. That the typical roadway cross section for the cul -de -sac which is proposed east of Sullivan Road and extends southeasterly from Indiana Avenue shall be typical roadway section No. 1 access standard. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department ( Cont'd) 17. That prior to recording of the final plat, the Burlington Northern Railroad line which runs through portions of the proposal on both the east and west sides of Sullivan Road, shall be abandoned or relocated. Prior to release of a building permit for those portions of the proposal identified as Phase I, the applicant shall: 18. Obtain permits for roadway construction from the appropriate state and county agencies (Spokane County Engineer). 19. Improve the Sullivan Road Intersection in a manner consistent with the approved plans and as set forth in the supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. 20. Construct those roadways which are identified in the supplemental Environmental Impact Statement as being necessary in order to accommodate traffic volumes which will be generated by Phase I. Construction shall be in conformance with the approved roadway plans and typical roadway cross - sections. Roadway construction must be completed prior to the release of building permits or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction improvements, construction certification, "as- built" plans, and monumenting the street centerline shall be filed with the County Engineer. 21. Construct a connection to the existing Indiana Avenue which is located to the south and west of the westerly boundary of the proposed plat. It shall be theapplicant's responsibility to obtain the necessary right -of -way alignment for this connection. This connection must provide for a smooth transition between the existing Indiana Avenue and that which is proposed within the plat. The transition alignment shall be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer. The County Engineer will provide assistance during right -of -way negotiations should it be necessary. 22. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as- built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 23. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the proposed building site prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. NEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 24. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan for proposed building sites shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing, as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. 25. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 26. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 27. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 28. Should the Phase I development include those portions of the property lying east of Sullivan Road, the applicant will be required to construct the Sullivan Road improvement and interchange modifications which are scheduled for construction in order to accommodate Phase II of the proposal. 29. That Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road shall be constructed per the approved plans and typical roadway cross - section if properties east of Sullivan Road are included in Phase I. 30. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to function as a private road providing that the roadway is constructed in accordance with Spokane County public road standards and in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross - section. 31. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County road right -of -way from the County Engineer. No work will be performed within the County road right -of -way without a permit. 32: If Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This document provides the following: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County, Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Section 3.07, Sections A 8 B of that title. 33. The traffic generated by the proposed project will have a significant impact upon Sullivan Road between Interstate 90 and Sprague Avenue. It is anticipated that a two -way left turn lane will be needed to accommodate turning movements along the Sprague to I -90 corridor. This left turn lane will be required prior to the construction of Phase II. Prior to the commencement of Phase III, it will be necessary to improve Sullivan Road to a seven lane facility. The proposed Design Report for the Evergreen Interchange shall also include a review of traffic conditions along the Sullivan Road /I -90 corridor. The above specified roadway improvements shall be considered within that analysis. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to pay for the costs of right -of -way acquisition and roadway improvements along Sullivan between I -90 and Sprague for Phase II. Should other land development occur along the Sprague /I -90 Corridor which has measurable traffic impacts (i.e. large commercial or industrial uses) then a formula for participation in the sharing of costs for roadway improvements will be developed by the County Engineer. The formula will consider the traffic volumes generated by Sullivan Park Center as well as other identified traffic generators. For the Phase III improvements, a formula for the assessment of costs will be developed by the County Engineer in cooperation with the applicant. Of principal consideration in the development of the formula will be the traffic volumes generated by this project, traffic generated by other projects and other traffic utilizing the roadway. 34. That prior to the initiation of Phase II of the proposed development, the applicant will conduct an updated traffic study. This study may be included within the design report which will be prepared for the Evergreen Road Interchange. The Design Report shall also consider the impacts upon the County Road System of the extension of a connection to Mission Avenue from the proposed Evergreen Interchange. This analysis shall include potential traffic Impacts upon Evergreen Road between Sprague Avenue and the connection. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) PHASE II Roadway construction and improvements for Phase II of the proposal shall be consistent with the improvements which have been identified within the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. Those improvements are as follows: 35. Construction and upgrading of the Sullivan Road - Indiana intersection in a manner consistent with the plans which have been improved by the Spokane County Engineer and the State of Washington Department of Transportation. 36. Construction of new freeway interchange at or near the alignment of Evergreen Road as identified within the Supplemental EIS. 37. Construction of Evergreen Road from Indiana Avenue southward to the proposed freeway interchange. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. 38. Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed Evergreen Road) shall be improved to a five -lane facility from Evergreen Road westerly to the connection with the existing Indiana Avenue. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. That Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed plat) must be widened to provide additional traffic lanes in order to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. A five lane facility is required to mitigate the traffic impacts upon Indiana Avenue and adjoining business properties. A plan for the upgrade of the intersection at Pines and Indiana must be submitted to the County Engineer as specified in condition #9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to secure the additional right -of -way for the improvement of Indiana Avenue. 39. Indiana Avenue (east of Sullivan Road) shall be constructed as a five -lane facility from Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus of the project. Indiana shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. 40. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to function as a private road, providing that the roadway is constructed in accordnace with Spokane County Public Road Standards in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross - section. 41. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County road right -of -way from the County Engineer. No work will be performed within the County road right -of -way without a permit. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont 42. If Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This document provides the following: That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road Improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Section 3.07, Sections A and B of that title. 43.. Should the Evergreen Interchange Design Report determine that the level of improvements as specified within the Suplemental EIS are not necessary for Phase II, then the County Engineer may approve a phased plan for roadway construction or design deviations for Phase II roadway improvements. 44. That a public road Right -of -Way connection shall be provided to properties which are located to the south and east of Parcels #27 and #28 as depicted on the preliminary plat. This will require a redesign of the plat in this area. PHASE III 45. The roadway improvements for Phase III identified within the Supplemental EIS are the connection from the new freeway interchange at Evergreen Road southward to Mission Avenue and the possible connections northward and eastward of the proposal. The need for these improvements will be addressed in the development of the Evergreen Interchange Design Report. The level of improvements, assignment of financial responsibility for improvements and timing of construction will be determined on the basis of traffic volumes, location of facilities and traffic safety related issues. 46. Phase III improvements as identified by the Design Report shall be constructed prior to the commencement of Phase III construction. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Health District (COnt'd) 2. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage system shall not be authorized." 3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social & Health Services. 4. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 5. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation c. a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Connection to the Valley sewer system is to be made prior to release of occupancy permits for any structures within the site. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1. That the applicant obtain necessary approval from the Department of Transportation for each phase of the project prior to finalization. 2. That the applicant submit proof to the Planning Department file that Washington State Department of Transportation conditions have been satisfactorily handled prior to finalization of any portion of the preliminary plat. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) WASHINGTON STATE OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION 1. In the event that archaeological or historic resources are discovered during project activities, the applicant or successor shall notify the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation in Olympia, Washington. 4 7 Adisc4 t / 4 / 1 L' .5 - Date �. x)) 71_- 4. 6 ///da-,7 74, dnfetc 1 5 ° 4 - - `05 /V veinb / 9� \take 0.. isc2- N 5 Z. Cavt = 1-t)tlsti k Mawr / Ue i CCU.„ 1owt Mokkt - Rzice De Q.Q o?m CrrimP pE ISOtt-SS L '42 ?A2ce1S� ©c eAoev 2.1 1otS5 R.tt• l �.NSaN �an c\y t3 \ai CU IS et' 4 14a - 1' � I\ c\ d . _ co tin staff ° C.anct Eton s- a s lavn¢a.)cie.61 tr, kir aa.t n c '4-a 12 t,cu est Rev < e lieu do.? vn Q &at 1 p ( - co ccQ Gr.v6_ .t `Sto`t'( 0f PRo Fos a.Q. Q44 bra evnd ..cvtnl. ltiaatto, O tc,n.L 4 u-e. 12-e(taw aI PAaaao. a. t wa Q w wt CP Ge. sdyte we ed d.o -un•, v" Lif- u 2034 UcLEP.e � _ r Sc�vFo z tecijL i ✓z TT, msw ea d / e . +zee p. Q RG tGo -c _ _ g . �rcvtn- s.E;i,S, , > Oct 2 3 i t9Sf5 - a Mad-ea . -- C44lCLd � 4 fQ. /Ztn) -4410 (f� ernretna1/2 � 1 / l r d9V-e 1 Suu.a au lP k Cent Advil et ovia.),e4.. cif /16ev z j / 15 - elk R a., , t�L - N.ah�VwYI cynct - ""' (/ -ctv1 Ho-Pro / Ra-acuyer \J pmt¢ c tr Pc�o Una/ _ Q v�cl r..yi-ttterhofrent, �anvvLt.� r � F e d . R A . t d � - c . e 4. 0 - E N E ;PA , .Reu i e ) 3. PG t o, tAotke- - . t -ie.. .zv nrn-e,/ci_ Rckdi tr Gasat 0.a.pa 41-6 OPPoSifi)c/il _ _CZ G55vvr \?�&st Qa - c ck-a °f-e t,N cvo Loma . _5 J an PAR,ic a4 Ga lake, C .>t124/22 ° tYU - Preveesed a onatnuc@'un • Q cc_ esS To - Lt.- G t2y_ _ uri L Ort (r -G¢ce Ov\ rr; -a w /24± d y IctO_I N �ut�iva . • OfNatrAke2 C �vt eN2... Z.. ^J Gii Niot tkdc`cc�s; A\:ce Ll.onc, ll ueilt, ea rz y Go 1dde�� _ e04 � &P eLt ka- an (?eve , E�en � &-Qt 1t) ti t.AA CALLA. . 5 .Puu urru 12.4 Dm- ,400 Yaire Povakz. a.fer Q, . Pato( A pre.-2A-ttid4 nzLe v 2TYw� u ✓l mta i 1 a Gyc -�f1 vo t ., 17, , w fie, wd a n el tfi � P 0 .L'•v Tt%c e acssn on Ceon5) . 1, mom GAL; Ol2Q _ 0 F ( 2 a%ECkk A.M2L C \) U,,lX C$) - Pec aesttcn4 CUP-e-t. C "ovic `C12i)1212 ate. VI cup utt,. P . _w, tM phaatz. L. EstelQ WAQ.-euz, It Pd • iunA) . n .a.k ..e_ Cin.ami g go • Oon.cca ?,.' o_93-0-t Gt (1\ Net two -. tucczc -g -- o%V_ _ Flo 14- ,Ac-e4 OAR)°,civt ck U1/4-)o tP p>?op.erati es 1�t _L- ivkon_c,.an, - 1 tai tsa. V j a _ as S2 /ft- St rice_ -t4 77, 14ea42.6C o 1be Qopnn sid Tt u o-c 1t€.u.e pree ± mp..1 Q• -0-61/44--re ite4t Q e-> . CovtteARAALS. oJro c- Sri Itb Vat Stag p". Pe r' Lt•ecup.. 9 e 4 Z0° f = gec 1 Sreae ,t f 1 5 ft Z = Ref..k. ;rewr Stier • 0. Sees = Pe 1 5o4 . Orw; L- - %cc- pawl4 i%ttt. Mick 9 pp t)r'c/ /s%c& S . p� VkS% e.ts - queteei Sake ?ro ie c}ern rc s }he+rr Ebca Sal es- mc% icw-C. -aecrwa. J-cnce 14 lam rhea. duceease B. (au•SCrw.ad- EcASrbil:r . &Inc pro�ecT Ott". Th'u.s T 1 krma�. c '. _Say C e. - l e Con dm_.1A)r. } q _ c+ p, � &z-. 5. - s O0 � �.Ac9 (1)(10:14.4) — d D. ll w;rt1/49 .6 "`Vt"' e . C.ettiz eotr ID2m( - Qc{e ft x 1 t'91 (f CA-AL( ( c 31)+,1 e. e` �/YLLQC ed� - 'Hutt CIO M ec.- R trr Q S tn.c f pc., Ce„4.t e4t 0o-tad mat L eCU.a. )-t z wy S E'/31,15 o chart — (,(Ja a� 4 Ong. W Lc c-�ra -ccQ� ti ee/k• e tz t „,, 4 ,_ cktp-eletentafth 0..orn Pr Ock Z 1 1435 Ccryktc Q. +0 ls 11 8' 9%e° rR \)etzt gut \c ru d atS C ° o [e mail tt , w e K se -.QA o 2c� , �aoc1 e} QU J± nA) (Ana }o2 d �U pon V (( �. o c � n-e -x- Rap, d - 5 S. � _RQ .. c".r r s.h / a Cry ILi cy (,u Q_ l r i en u, a UZc c� u 1 on cites fc/Lfr ovr P LUNG NG c- LQ.Ld ca c. Primc..t w2 e i 1 Oa CQV°v\ Y2a.i 01.) 2n3�_ nag( - 148( — I15 m nech . aft -S. - /790 q .c1/41 , 41 bIca i 2 _ 1) 5 0.4,--(5),__ A -Act- .L, - �ad�G�._ e./4.41mi.. /� Wi � r lY71 tAk tot -_ RO p-d1J 5� -?tea � v VV 7 NA \RnA.Mcdf0 __177 lCli __ _ .STfiz./ . _ °y- Aqr5/4.5 (3) MAkeuR.. od-022j. ai i nvyk y G 4' , Tbaee, e & Gr n ` o. ,. . woaacwic_ oNA `Ads d- .X s uni I. 54/it/cry- . -- 3 A. II- 1 idl/ e L- 7 L i /dUSTreia 1 =D- a G RPkit ?e5aNn - I t - --Di5C45)0-in r _ c7P�cJXZ. 7 2.0_fra -- - .-!'x rd aceirc _ C ry -(Y - Act g ea/2 1 S C0/Ein Gn_ Rat �- /Cei1 � pii d ap.. v-e_ *0 ter` `X9 wed _ _ .P. -e, fio - a 1 %8' vo- Th `M(19.1;1.) 1, )D.29.i.o. - ~ I - - Plh'LL.t,Y R - - //"/ 95TH- f /an ctivein 1. _NN y - 1/20 5 8/4 d - 1\i To- n.. 0-n 5 (Ain-p-rA- — p �a� % attar a vie, _ M a. azYu (1}�..t-ic c_oi) 5-6,4 ot `d l9 y' ?�al att r La 7 pQ G Gikn o _e 3 D atm- IR t n SQ-o \cQP- E \ - 7i2 o d).ftb_a. a.41.A4n 4-11-0 SZ\ cS (k tort 10 y k) d_ Uva/zah- -= G c z. i cs t o - du:d _ rvkat ‘r?_Q - _BA - rD Etc, 4 / S -51- - _ N 3_\33 �N YZ!vv� _ - Ra-ad Gpe _ - tl .-1:2eo_rUa.Yn.vr. Evi C •55/17 -- Qfra Sal.e.f.m4 :� of A• 4.:=. t 4Q-6;:r fceo 6 .+' eve, dd rgeti _ . ' (l/ G, % 4 %4w %2a4 ' W a/ p- - 1 / W". o- % 4, - -Clti1 +� ilLeares, it) .444 - / /r q peatect ,e2iv GOe.i e , J _ Palk wc Mrs, _ caps, v�nv�JL � �Lfi2 Vit t czr - .a,cvo , -ai/k. _ - - � - .24 /. - G.. WIIVATIPMIVA 13 eglidifien - ritrd .11 — / 5 ---PS- - /�% - O M 814 C9V1204 Jr - -- -k 7 T W n , el 5 S I oB ).D \ \P u e �( 1 17 ; &___oRk Q lu fl -- ,u,t c4-u - _ ta- Ouncer x 04-- ind M rl.4a 9GC q 3nc € Qijd .,-a.- Pi/no 67 -J - 64 gacwa a ut \ co v 0.4 flat &Q° cwva oun A,w-bru '\. , _Ad et- i 5 7r *r ` a-, red__ !_ c_t g LI t ie :5fo. �.' �..D�... 1i= _MO t i.ce oin G- i cc e 5 5API/ _ Shrt_ 0 x C 644' fter76.104 __weitiL fo_ A .en ie-fl side -• Ja_o & l - 'Minis- _prize. cue,;/\nt- Cora_ deue-Par , _ht?ahs 2vc 4414;„ 5 ivide5 _ a'aC i ft11L 91 __ d e fit . _ S " 1-4771 1 C feel- 42- ____ - �u? o @fete -- _ Gu 3�v ��6i 44_� — l-4 i 5 _ �d Q e.�.�i lA en-s-s'a sys! t _ ot- e-e-wt _ r 'YYlayrc -e- ntwJ4 _ 6,e- divt.- .- levox - \)0 �,, Ad-tt-\ a PLANNING REPORT OCTOBER 24; 1985 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF RE: PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION, ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER ZE- 180 -78, Reclassify land presently zoned Restricted Industrial to the zoning schedule shown in this report as it relates to the preliminary plat map. I GENERAL INFORMATION: ' Sponsor: 467 -0770 Hanson Properties, Inc. N. 8700 Crestline Spokane, WA 99207 II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION A. B. C. D. E. Lots 1 thru 15,19,20 Lots 21 thru 36 Lots 16 thru 18 Tracts A thru F Local Business (LB) Restricted Industrial Commercial (C) Agricultural (A) Surveyor /Engineer: (206) 454 -3250 Wilsey & Ham /Simpson Engineers 1980 - 112th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 Location: The center will be north of Interstate 90 on either side of the Sullivan Road interchange. The site lies southeast of the Spokane River and occupies portions of Sections 10, 11, 12, 13 & 14, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. Proposal: A mixed -use development on a 226 -acre site is being planned in Spokane County. Included are a 79 -acre regional shopping center, 19 acres of other commercial use, 22 acres of business park, 53 acres of industrial park, a 300 -room hotel and a remaining 43 acres of roadways and open space. Site Size: 226 acres; total of 42 lots. Comprehensive Plan: INDUSTRIAL, within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. Site Characteristics: Generally flat with native grasses. The site is crossed by Burlington Northern Railroad lines. General Character of Vicinity: To the north of the site lies the Spokane River and to the south lies the I -90 freeway. Zoning: Proposal: - Reclassify land presently zoned Restricted Industrial to the zoning schedule shown below as it relates to the preliminary plat map: Current Zoning Ordinance Proposed Zoning Code - 15 - Community Business (B -2) (R -I) Industrial Park (I -1) Regional Business (B -3) General Agricultural (GA) - 16 - .M.uWI C l PRELIMINARY PLAT la SULLIVAN PARK CENTER t..r.TO r • WILSEY&HAM wc. -n..nn • a.-a.. •-.-,�n a.- .-w. -n.. • ••flu _s --- — 4_— 1 EEE SHEET Ma 1 1 t PRELIWARY PLAT lai SUWVAN PARK CENTER wa—tO- - 17 - WI SEY &HAM WC. ,:. -- HMO Sal • t BUSINESS PARK CONCEPT SULLIVAN PARK CENTER Spokane County, VVashirgton COMMERCIAL CONCEPT ILLUSTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Cinti ----1 ttra ....,:,- -........ vaTararnaszow —1QmaZ. Quia INDUSTRIAL PARK CONCEPT Consultant: Whey & Ham 00 • ZONING SUWVAN PARK CENTER • Spokane County, Walston —reatmaTRzi "" `"=" i A l= Consultant: Whey 8 Ham PLANNING REPORT, OCTOBER 24, 1985 II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (Cont'd) Existing Zoning: North - Agricultural. East - Agricultural. South - Agricultural. West - Agricultural & Restricted Industrial. F. Land Use: Site - Generally natural grasses, vacant. North - Spokane River. East - Flora Road. South - Fields; Interstate 90. West - Fields; McDonald Road extended. G. Proposed Uses: Use Acres Regional Commercial 78.5 Commercial 19.4 Business Park 22.4 Hotel 8.7 Industrial Park 52.6 Open Space /Park 22.2 Public Roads & ROW 22.2 TOTAL: 226.0 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER H. Comprehensive Plan Designation: The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Industrial and is within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. The project borders Urban and Major Commercial Comprehensive plan categories. The project is consistent with the Industrial category guidelines in that fully developed public services will be part of this project, i.e., public water, sewer, improved circulation system and roadway design. The proposed uses remain consistent with previously approved actions. I. Special Information: Circulation - Initially the Sullivan Road I -90 interchange and Indiana Avenue will be the most heavily affected roadways. A future interchange at Evergreen Road is anticipated in the later development of the site. Summary of Transportation Improvements: Phase I — instruct Indiana Avenue as 4 -lane divided boulevard from Sullivan Road west to future Evergreen Road right -of -way. Construct Indiana Avenue as 2 -lane facility from Evergreen right -of -way westward to a connection with existing Indiana Avenue near west property boundary. ▪ Signalize intersection of Sullivan /Indiana. - Construct connections from I -90 /Sullivan ramps to Indiana Avenu.e - Prepare design report for I -90 /Evergreen Interchange. - 20 - PLANNING REPORT, OCTOBER 24, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (Cont'd) Special Information (Cont'd) Summary of Transportation Improvements (Cont'd) Phase II -construct new I -90 interchange at Evergreen Road. - Construct Evergreen Road as a 4 -lane divided boulevard north from I -90 to Indiana Avenue. - Widen Indiana Avenue to five lanes from Evergreen Road to west property boundary. - Construct Indiana Avenue as 5 -lane facility from Sullivan Road to east property boundary. Phase III : Evergreen Road from I -90 interchange south to Mission Road. Design - The project has been designed to accept substantial increases in traffic as a result of the proposed development and will be constructed in phases which relate to the volume of traffic generated rather than lots finalized. The design incorporates the landscaping provisions of the draft 1985 Spokane County Zoning Code Ordinance. Open spaces and a riparian park are planned to maintain aesthetics of the Spokane River and provide vegetative cover at major entry ways to the project. Drainage - The provisions of Spokane County's 208 program will apply. Due to the flatness of the site, no significant drainage problems are anticipated. Power Transmission Lines - The site is affected by two transmission lines which will pose building limitations on lots within their paths. Water Supply - Consolidated Irrigation District will provide water. An approved water Plan will be required prior to finalizing this preliminary plat. Sewage Disposal - The development of the site is conditioned upon providing public sewer service to each lot. Cultural Resources - None have been identified III. HISTORY /ANALYSIS The initial concept of a regional shopping center and industrial park was approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee on March 6, 1981 for this site. A "specific development plan" was to be approved prior to development. The current proposal is intended to provide more specific detail regarding the proposal and specific features to be incorporated into the overall project. The applicant requests that the project be conditioned to comply with the zoning, landscaping, circulation network and other improvements, however, that administrative review be available for individual lot development. - 21 - PLANNING REPORT, OCTOBER 24, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), an environmental impact statement was prepared for the project. The environmental impact statement was utilized in preparing this report and pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.060 the EIS may be used as documentation to deny or conditionally aprove the project. V. LEAD AGENCY SUMMARY The Planning Department recommends approval of the proposal based upon previously approved zoning and the projects conformance to development guidelines of the Industrial category of the Comprehensive Plan. This recommendation is based upon the applicant's apparent ability to mitigate potential adverse impacts of the project, particularly traffic and waste water as well as provide substantial green space amenities in the form of landscaping and a riparian park. VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. 1. That the below listed conditions of all Departments and Agencies are binding upon the applicant, owner(s) of the property, heirs, successors or assigns. COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2. The preliminary plat of record approval is for the property legally described in the application for this proposal. 3. That the final plat(s) be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record as legally described and advertised. 4. The Spokane County Subdivision Administrator shall review any proposed Final Plat to insure compliance with the Findings and Conditions of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. 5. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for three (3) years to November 1, 1988. The applicant may request an Extension of Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 6. Upon filing the Final Plat the zone change of the Final Plat area shall be finalized and the existing Agricultural and Restricted Industrial zone classifications shall be in accordance with the zoning concept plan. 7. Prior to finalization of any part of the project, the existing Burlington Northern railroad lines through the western portion of the property will be either acquired and abandoned or relocated to the north of Indiana Avenue along the riparian park on the preliminary plat. - 2 2 - PLANNING REPORT, OCTOBER 24, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) Planning Department (Cont'd) 8. The applicant shall submit evidence that any structures located within the development are compatible with easement rights of any grantees of record, i.e., transmission lines prior to building permit release. 9. Prior to the finalization of Phase I, the general area shown as the riparian park shall be either dedicated to Spokane County for park purposes or shall be owned and maintained as a passive park by the Property Owners Association to be formed by the purchasers of lots within the project. Specific conditions, covenants and restrictions relating to maintenance and use of the park shall be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Zoning Administrator and filed with the Spokane County Auditor. 10. That the planting and maintenance of the limited access areas shown as Open Space at the Sullivan Road /I -90 interchange and south of Indiana shall be provided by applicant or successors consistent with road landscaping requirements of Spokane County and the State of Washington. 11. The open space plantings and maintenance at the proposed Evergreen interchange shall be provided by the applicant or successor at the time the interchange is established. 12. The boulevard treatment landscaping for Indiana will be established or provided for as part of Phase I finalization by the applicant or successors. 13. That a Final Plat name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 14. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat, for distribution to the County Planning Department, Utilities Department, Engineering Department, Health District and applicable utility companies. Written approval of said utility easements by said utility companies must be received with the submittal of the final plat. 15. That a current certificate of title be furnished the County Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 16. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements unless the applicant(s) /sponsor(s) choose to file a notarized Waiver of Notice of Action with the Spokane County Planning Department. 17. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. -23- PLANNING REPORT, OCTOBER 24, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) Planning Department (Cont'd) 18. That a plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection be approved by the water supplier, fire protection district, Spokane County Building & Safety Department and County health authorities. The agencies will certify on the WATER PLAN, prior to the filing of the final plat or any phase of the preliminary plat that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The WATER PLAN and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved WATER PLAN. The time schedule will provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat sponsor shall also sign the WATER PLAN to confirm the contractual arrangements or agreements. The final plat dedication will contain the following statement: "the public water system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building & Safety Department, and water purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 19. That no building permit will be issued for any lot within the Final Plat until certified by a Washington State licensed engineer "that the water system has been installed pursuant the approved WATER PLAN for the Final Plat ", signed and stamped by said engineer. The certification may be in the form of a letter but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the WATER PLAN as a schematic map showing the "As Built" water system. 20. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 21. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the draft Spokane County Zoning Code. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 22. All mitigating measures set forth in the Final EIS be complied with. - 24 - PLANNING REPORT; OCTOBER 24, 1985 VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) -25- PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER County Planning Department (Cont'd) 23. That the project is subject to the Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone of the Spokane County Ordinance, which sets forth various measures for Aquifer protection; specifically, measures dealing with wastewater disposal, spill protection measures and stormwater runoff. COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT 1. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to dedication of Right -of -Way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. That plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. 5. That appropriate provisions be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1 -ft. strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the final plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) 6. A statement must appear. in the dedicatory language of the final plat: "that individual driveway access permits be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system." 7. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to Sullivan Road. 8. That all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. 9. That the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal acceptable to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway- County Road intersection. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the responsibility of the sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. This shall include both Phase I and Phase II designs. PLANNING REPORT, OCTOBER 24, 1985 VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department ( Cont'd) -26- PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER 10. That the applicant shall coordinate with the Spokane County Parks and Recreation Department and the County Engineer's Department to provide a bicycle pathway through the northern portion of the project paralleling the Spokane River. This pathway would be provided in lieu of bicycle lanes along the proposed arterial streets. 11. That access to Evergreen Road from parcels 12, 15, 16 and 17 is prohibited. 12. That the applicant shall submit to the County Engineer an.intersection plan for the Evergreen -local access road located south of Indiana. 13. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which established regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 14. That prior to finalization of the proposed plat, the applicant shall submit to the County Engineer for review and approval "Typical" Roadway Cross Sections for the following proposed roadways: a. Indiana Avenue Sullivan to the proposed Evergreen intersection. b. Indiana Avenue from the proposed Evergreen intersection to the connection with the existing Indiana Avenue at the west end of the proposal. c. Evergreen Road south of Indiana Avenue, between Indiana and the proposed Evergreen interchange. d. Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus. 15. The typical roadway cross section for the roadway which connects the proposed Evergreen Road with the proposed Indiana Avenue in the westerly portion of the plat shall be typical roadway section No. 1 access standard. 16. That the typical roadway cross section for the cul -de -sac which is proposed east of Sullivan Road and extends southeasterly from Indiana Avenue shall be typical roadway section No. 1 access standard. 17. That prior to recording of the final plat, the Burlington Northern Railroad line which runs through portions of the proposal on both the east and west sides of Sullivan Road, shall be abandoned or relocated. Prior to release of a building permit for those portions of the proposal identified as Phase I, the applicant shall: 18. Obtain permits for roadway construction from the appropriate state and county agencies (Spokane County Engineer). PLANNING REPORT, OCTOBER 24, 1985 VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department ( Cont'd) 19. Improve the Sullivan Road Intersection in a manner consistent with the approved plans and as set forth in the supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER 20. Construct those roadways which are identified in the supplemental Environmental Impact Statement as being necessary in order to accommodate traffic volumes which will be generated by Phase I. Construction shall be in conformance with the approved roadway plans and typical roadway cross - sections. Roadway construction must be completed prior to the release of building permits or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction improvements, construction certification, "as- built" plans, and monumenting the street centerline shall be filed with the County Engineer. 21. Construct a connection to the existing Indiana Avenue which is located to the south and west of the westerly boundary of the proposed plat. It shall be the aplicant's responsibility to obtain the necessary right -of -way alignment for this connection. This connection must provide for a smooth transition between the existing Indiana Avenue and that which is proposed within the plat. The transition alignment shall be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer. The County Engineer will provide assistance during right -of -way negotiations should it be necessary. 22. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as- built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 23. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the proposed building site prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. 24. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan for proposed building sites shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing, as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. 25. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. -27- PLANNING REPORT, OCTOBER 24, 1985 VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department ( Cont'd) PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER 26. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 27. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 28. Should the Phase I development include those portions of the property lying east of Sullivan Road, the applicant will be required to construct the Sullivan Road improvement and interchange modifications which are scheduled for construction in order to accommodate Phase II of the proposal. 29. That Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road shall be constructed per the approved plans and typical roadway cross - section if properties east of Sullivan Road are included in Phase I. 30. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to function as a private road providing that the roadway is constructed in accordance with Spokane County public road standards and in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross - section. 31. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County road right -of -way from the County Engineer. No work, will be performed within the County road right -of -way without a permit. 32. If Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This document provides the following: That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County, Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Section 3.07, Sections A & B of that title. 33. The traffic generated by the proposed project will have a significant impact upon Sullivan Road between Interstate 90 and Sprague Avenue. It is anticipated that a two -way left turn lane will be needed to accommodate turning movements along the Sprague to I -90 corridor. This left turn lane will be required prior to the construction of Phase II. Prior to the commencement of Phase III, it will be necessary to improve Sullivan Road to a seven lane facility. -28- PLANNING REPORT, OCTOBER 24, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) The proposed Design Report for the Evergreen Interchange shall also include a review of traffic conditions along the Sullivan Road /I -90 corridor. The above specified roadway improvements shall be considered within that analysis. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to pay for the costs of right -of -way acquisition and roadway and sidewalk improvements along Sullivan between I -90 and Sprague for Phase II. For the Phase III improvements, a formula for the assessment of costs will be developed by the County Engineer in cooperation with the applicant. Of principal consideration in the development of the formula will be the traffic volumes generated by this project, traffic generated by other projects and other traffic utilizing the roadway. 34. That prior to the initiation of Phase II of the proposed development, the applicant will conduct an updated traffic study. This study may be included within the design report which will be prepared for the Evergreen Road Interchange. The Design Report shall also consider the impacts upon the County Road System of the extension of a connection to Mission Avenue from the proposed Evergreen Interchange. This analysis shall include potential traffic impacts upon Evergreen Road between Sprague Avenue and the connection. PHASE II Roadway construction and improvements for Phase II of the proposal shall be consistent with the improvements which have been identified within the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. Those improvements are as follows: 35. Construction and upgrading of the Sullivan Road - Indiana intersection in a manner consistent with the plans which have been improved by the Spokane County Engineer and the State of Washington Department of Transportation. 36. Construction of new freeway interchange at or near the alignment of Evergreen Road as identified within the Supplemental EIS. 37. Construction of Evergreen Road from Indiana Avenue southward to the proposed freeway interchange. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. 38. Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed Evergreen Road) shall be improved to a five -lane facility from Evergreen Road westerly to the connection with the existing Indiana Avenue. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. - 2 9 - PLANNING REPORT, OCTOBER 24, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) That Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed plat) must be widened to provide additional traffic lanes in order to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. A five lane facility is required to mitigate the traffic impacts upon Indiana Avenue and adjoining business properties. A plan for the upgrade of the intersection at Pines and Indiana must be submitted to the County Engineer as specified in condition #9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to secure the additional right -of -way for the improvement of Indiana Avenue. 39. Indiana Avenue (east of Sullivan Road) shall be constructed as a five -lane facility from Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus of the project. Indiana shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. 40. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to function as a private road, providing that the roadway is constructed in accordnace with Spokane County Public Road Standards in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross - section. 41. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County road right -of -way from the County Engineer. No work will be performed within the County road right -of -way without a permit. 42. If Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This document provides the following: That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road Improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Section 3.07, Sections A and B of that title. 43. Should the Evergreen Interchange Design Report determine that the level of improvements as specified within the Suplemental EIS are not necessary for Phase II, then the County Engineer may approve a phased plan for roadway construction or design deviations for Phase II roadway improvements. 44. That a public road connection shall be provided to properties which are located to the south and east of Parcels #27 and #28 as depicted on the preliminary plat. This will require a redesign of the plat in this area. -30- PLANNING REPORT, OCTOBER 24, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER PHASE III 45: The roadway improvements for Phase III identified within the Supplemental EIS are the connection from the new freeway interchange at Evergreen Road southward to Mission Avenue and the possible connections northward and eastward of the proposal. The need for these improvements will be addressed in the development of the Evergreen Interchange Design Report. The level of improvements, assignment of financial responsibility for improvements and timing of construction will be determined on the basis of traffic volumes, location of facilities and traffic safety related issues. 46. Phase III improvements as identified by the Design Report shall be constructed prior to the commencement. of Phase III construction. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 2. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage system shall not be authorized." 3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social & Health Services. 4. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 5. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1 The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. - 31 - PLANNING REPORT, OCTOBER 24, 1985 VI: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Utilities Department (Cont'd) 2: Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Connection to the Valley sewer system is to be made. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1. That the applicant obtain necessary approval from the Department of Transportation for each phase of the project prior to finalization. 2. That the applicant submit proof to the Planning Department file that Washington State Department of Transportation conditions have been satisfactorily handled prior to finalization of any portion of the preliminary plat. WASHINGTON STATE OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION 1. In the event that archaeological or historic resources are discovered during project activities, the applicant or successor shall notify the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation in Olympia, Washington. -32- PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER I—` OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Inter - office Communication To Spokane County Zoning Administrator From Subject BMc /set Spokane County Engineer t `(It.v.✓ PE 1504 Sullivan Park Center Date October 22 RE: Planning Report of October 24, 1985 28 with the following underlined language; It shall be the applicant's responsibility to pay for the costs of right -of -way acquisition and roadway and- s#dewalk improvements along Sullivan between I -90 and Sprague for Phase II. Should other land development occur along the Sprague -I -90 Corridor which has measurable traffic impacts (i.e. large commercial or industrial uses) then a formula for participation in the sharing of costs for roadway improvements will be developed by the County Engineer. The formula will consider the traffic volumes generated by Sullivan Park Center as well as other identified traffic generators. For the Phase III improvements, a formula for the assessment of costs will be developed by the County Engineer in cooperation with the applicant. Of principal consideration in the development of the formula will be the traffic volumes generated by this project, traffic generated by other projects and other traffic utilizing the roadway. 2. Please add the following underlined language to condition #44 page 30. 44. "that a public road Right -of -way connection shall be provided to properties. lq 85 1. Please amend condition #33 on page delete the dashed out language. 33. The traffic generated by the proposed project will have a significant impact upon Sullivan Road between Interstate 90 and Sprague Avenue. It is anticipated that a two -way left turn lane will be needed to accommodate turning movements along the Sprague to I -90 Corridor. This left turn lane will be required prior to the construction of Phase II. Prior to the commencement of Phase III, it will be necessary to improve Sullivan Road to a seven lane facility. The proposed Design Report for the Evergreen Interchange shall also include a review of traffic conditions along the Sullivan Road -I -90 Corridor. The above specified roadway improvements shall be considered within that analysis. S v LA.. I'IbJ 1 / S R 9 (t h N Loci - 15,$ 3$ NiO S • LEC S 0 C.-.■ VISIWC3 R.O,elbwAY 1 4,os4 Zto 2,74S 4 1,o12- WMES A . 101Q x O M y ki L 1 W Ltc t 3,523 4 3ULL\vA.t4/tsstoM! N L_a Q w t S)ZC09 2,747 Inter- office Communication To Spokane County Zoning Administrator From Subject PE 1504 Sullivan Park Center RE: Plannino Rannrt of nernhnr 94. 19RS 1: Please amend condition 1133 on page 28 with the following underlined language; delete the dashed out language, 1. Please add the following underlined language to condition #44 page 30. BMc /set OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date Oetohar 99 ,19 r.S Spokane County Engineer 'fh�/��_✓ 33. The traffic generated by the proposed project will have a significant impact upon Sullivan Road between Interstate 90 and Sprague Avenue. It is anticipated that a two -way left turn lane will be needed to accommodate turning movements along the Sprague to I -90 Corridor. This left turn lane will be required prior to the construction of Phase II. Prior to the commencement of Phase III, it will be necessary to improve Sullivan Road to a seven lane facility. The proposed Design Report for the Evergreen Interchange shall also include a review of traffic conditions along the Sullivan Road -I -90 Corridor. The above specified roadway improvements shall be considered within that analysis. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to pay for the costs of right -of -way acquisition and roadway and- •sidewa -1.k improvements along Sullivan between I -90 and Sprague for Phase II. Should other land development occur along the Sprague -I -90 Corridor which has measurable traffic impacts (i.e. large commercial or industrial uses) then a formula for participation in the sharing of costs for roadway improvements will be developed by the County Engineer. The formula will consider the traffic volumes generated by Sullivan Park Center as well as other identified traffic generators. For the Phase III improvements, a formula for the assessment of costs will be developed by the County Engineer in cooperation with the applicant. Of principal consideration in the development of the formula will be the traffic volumes generated by this project, traffic generated by other projects and other traffic utilizing the roadway. 44. that a public road Right -of -way connection shall be provided to properties. Sa6ad *0 Ttsubasol 'fotas 'a4eM►sieN tN s 11`WA‘SiS OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TO: Planning Department FROM: County Engineer's Department 124 SUBJECT: Road Conditions* For Plat of Sullivan Park Center No. PE -1504 *Conditions'Apply to Plat Under Consideration October 15, 1985 E 1 -that conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer is given subject . to dedication of Right -of -Way and approval of the road system as indicated in the pre- liminary plat of record. E 2 -that plans, profiles, and cross sections as designed to County standards showing pro- posed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. E 3 -that drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facil- ities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer: E 4 -that the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. E11 -that appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1 ft. strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Tem- porary cul -de -sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) E12 -a statement must appear in the dedicatory language of the plat that individual drive- way access permits be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. E14 -a statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to Sullivan Road. E17 -that all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. E20 -the word "applicant" shall include the owner of owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. E24 -that the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal acceptable to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway- County Road intersection at Sullivan Road and Indiana Avenue. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Im- provements to the State Highway are to be the responsibility of the Sponsor and may J' either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the Sate Highway Department.' This shall include both Phase I and Phase II designs. E30 -that the applicant shall coordinate with the Spokane County Parks and Recreation Department and the Co Engineer's Department to provide a bicycle pathway through the northern portion of the project paralleling the Spokane River. This pathway would be provided in lieu of bicycle lanes along the proposed arterial streets. E31 -that access to Evergreen Road from parcels 12, 15, 16 and 17 is. prohibited. E32 -that the applicant shall submit to the County Engineer an intersection plan for the Evergreen -local access road located South of Indiana. E33 -the proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which established regula- tions for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees in new construction. A. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS 1. That prior to finalization of the proposed plat the applicant shall submit to the county. Engineer for review and approval "Typical" Roadway Cross Sections for the following pro- ' posed roadways. a. Indiana Avenue Sullivan to the propsoed Evergreen intersection. b. Indiana Avenue from the proposed Evergreen intersection to the connection with the existing Indiana Avenue at the west end of the proposal. c. Evergreen Road south of Indiana Avenue, between Indiana and the proposed Ever- green interchange. d. Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus. 2. Improve the Sullivan Road Intersection in a manner consistent with the approved plans and as set forth in the supplemental environmental. impact statement. 2. The typical roadway cross section for the roadway which connects the proposed Evergreen Road with the proposed Indiana Avenue in the Westerly portion of the plat shall be typ- ical roadway section no. 1 access standard. 3. That the typical roadway cross section for the cul -de -sac which is proposed East of, Sul- livan Road and extends Southeasterly from Indiana Avenue shall be typical roadway section no. 1 access standard. 4. That prior to recording of the final plat the Burlington Northern Railroad Line which runs through portions of the proposal on both the east and west sides of Sullivan road, shall be abandoned or relocated. B. Prior to release of a building permit for those portions of the proposal identified as Phase I,( y)the Gpplicant shall: 1. Obtain permits for roadway construction from the appropriate state and county agencies (Spokane County Engineer). 2 3. Construct those roadways which were identified in the supplemental environmental impact statement as being necessary in order to accommodate traffic volumes .which will be gener- ated by Phase I. Construction shall be in conformance with the approved roadway plans and typical roadway cross - sections. Roadway construction must be completed prior to the release of building permits or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction improve- ments, construction certification, "as- built" plans, and monumenting the street center- line shall be filed with the County Engineer. , 4. Construct a connection to the existing Indiana Avenue which is located to the south and west of the Westerly boundary of the proposed plat. It shall be the applicant's .respon- sibility to obtain the necessary right -of -way alignment for this connection. This connection must provide for a smooth transition between the existing Indiana Avenue and that which is proposed within the plat. The transition alignment shall be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer. The County Engineer will provide assistance during right -of -way negotiations should it be necessary. 5. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who ahall furnish the County Engineer with "as-built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvaements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced: 6. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the proposed building site prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. 7. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan for proposed building sites shall be submit- ted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building per- mit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing, as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. 8. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 9. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 10. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended and are appli- cable to this proposal. 11. Should the Phase I development include those portions of the property lying East of Sul- livan Road, the applicant will be required to construct the Sullivan Road improvements and interchange modifications which are scheduled for construction in order to accommo- date Phase II of the proposal. 9 • 12. That Indiana Avenue East of Sullivan Road shall be constructed per the approved plans and typical roadway cross - section if properties East of'Sullivan Road are included in Phase I. 13. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue East of Sullivan Road to function as a private road providing that the roadway is constructed in accordance with Spokane County public road standards and'in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross - section. 14. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County road right -of -way from the County Engineer: No work will be performed within the County road right -of -way without a permit. 15. If Indiana Avenue East of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the appli- cant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This document' provides the following: That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private. road. Should Spokane County be .petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolu- tion No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Seciton 3.07, Sections A and B of that title: 16. The traffic generated by the proposed project will have a significant impact upon Sullivan Road between Interstate 90 and Sprague Avenue. It is anticipated that a two -way left turn lane will be needed to accommodate turning movements along the Sprague to I -90 corridor. This left turn lane will be required prior to the construction of Phase II. Prior to the commencement of Phase III, it will be necessary to improve Sullivan Road to a seven lane facility. The proposed Design Report for the Evergreen Interchange shall also include a review of traffic conditions along the Sullivan Road -I -90 Corridor. The above specified roadway improvements shall be considered within that analysis. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to pay for the costs of right -of -way acquisi- tion and roadway and sidewal9 improvements along Sullivan between I - 90 and Sprague for Phase II. For the phase ,hlI1improvements, a formula for the assessment of costs will be developed by the County Engineer in cooperation with the applicant. Of principal consid- eration in the development of the formula will be the traffic volumes generated by this project, traffic generated by other projects and other traffic utilizing the roadway. 17. That prior to the initiation of Phase II of the proposed development, the .applicant will conduct an updated traffic study. This study may be included within the design report which will be prepared for the Evergreen Road Interchange. The Design Report shall also consider the impacts upon the County Road System of the extension of a connection to Mission Avenue from the proposed Evergreen Interchange. This analysis shall include potential traffic impacts upon Evergreen Road between Sprague Avenue and the connection. ' 4 PHASE II Roadway construction and improvements for Phase II of the proposal shall be consistent with the improvements which have been identified within the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. Those improvements are as follows: . 1. Construction and upgrading of the Sullivan Road- Indiana intersection in a manner consis- tent with the plans which have been approved by the Spokane County Engineer and the State of Washington Dept. of Transportation. 2. Construction of new freeway interchange at or near the alignment of Evergreen Road'as identified within the Supplemental E.I.S. 3., Construction of Evergreen Road from Indiana Avenue southward to the proposed freeway interchange. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in con- formance with the approved typical roadway cross- section. 4. Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed Evergreen Road) shall be improved to a five -lane facility from Evergreen Road westerly to the conection with the existing Indiana Avenue. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross- section. That Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed plat) must be widened, to provide additional traffic lanes in order to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. A five lane facility is required to mitigate the traffic impacts upon Indiana Avenue and adjoining business properties. A plan for the upgrade of the intersection at Pines and Indiana must be submitted to the County Engineer as specified in condition E -24. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to secure the additional right -of -way for the improvement of Indiana Avenue. 5. Indiana Avenue (east of Sullivan Road) shall be constructed as a five -lane facility from Sullivan Road to the Easterly terminus of the project. Indiana shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross -sec- tion. 6. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue East of Sullivan Road to function as a private road, providing that the roadway is constructed in accordance with Spokane County Public Road Standards in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross - section. 7. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County Road right -of -way from the County Engineer. No work will be performed within the County Road right -of -way without a permit. 8. If Indiana Avenue East of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the appli- cant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This documents provides the following: That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their • heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in ' accordance with the provisions of Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolu- tion No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Seciton.3.07, Sections A and B of that title. 9 . Should the Evergreen Interchange Design Report determine that the level of. imprbvements as specified within the Supplemental EIS are not necessary for Phase II, then the County Engineer may approve a phased plan for roadway construction or design deviations for Phase II roadway imorovements. 10. That a public road connection shall be provided to properties which are located to the South and East of Parcels //27 and //28 as depicted on the preliminary plat. This will require a re- design of the plat in this area. PHASE III 1. The roadway improvements for Phase g as identified within the Supplemental E.I.S. are the connection from the new freeway interchange at Evergreen Road Southward to Mission Avenue and the possible connections Northward and Eastward of the proposal. The need for these improvements will be addressed in the development of the Evergreen Interchange Design Report. The level of improvements, assignment of financial responsibility for improvements and timing of construction will be determined on the basis of traffic volumes; location of facilities, and traffic safety related issues. • 2. Phase III improvements as identified by the Design Report shall be constructed prior to the commencement of Phase III 'construction. 6 reD3 GOOD .)0 S 6 T f., .4 i/a- CHeD co 4 .2 fTa.✓S u NeeV Ce g4 If I) l i✓1p/20t/Emeur Tp S owl vk„/ cs O 500774 ro Sal aye: ,✓Tc2 Z w/ P�4SC 2 c Li-? l J tM LAr✓E. DO' /O DEvE a 4-4-,E.5- p W /DE/v u/ /�{�S� 3 �r SC-� o.J CosfS E dC 12/2,0 /eAr� /c !/S. 74-C-raA Pe/a. Prvevr TO: FROM: Planning Department County Engineer's Department OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON October 15 , 1985 SUBJECT: Road Conditions* For Plat Name Sullivan Park Center Number PE -1504 *Conditions Cis -l..d Apply to Plat Under Consideration E 1 -that conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer is given subject to dedication of Right -of -Way and approval of the road system as indicated in the pre- liminary plat of record. E 2 -that plans, profiles, and cross sections as designed to County standards showing pro- posed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. E 3 -that drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facil- ities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to'be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. E 4 -that the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be ovserved since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. E11 -that appropriate ptovision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets he ded�ieated >a deeded: A 1 ft. strip at q ,� " . �m o f the ends or edges of all stree 2thatttermina e . or b e plat boundary. (Tem porary cul -de -sacs are requirkiwhen stre terminate ' at ghe plat boundaries.) a + t? 1 th is 4i J iii Sl " E12 -a statement must appear in th dedicatory language of the plat that individual drive way access permits be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. E14 -a statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to Sullivan Road. E17 -that all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. E20 -the wor "a p i cnt shall include the owner of owners of the property, his heirs, E24 -that the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal acceptable to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway- County Road intersection at Sullivan Road- Indi tacsection. State Highway Department approv- al of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the responsibility of the Sponsor and may either be constructed or , a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnished to A ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS 1. That prior to finalization of Engineer for review and appro posed roadways. a. Indiana Avenue Sulliva b. Indiana Avenue from th existing Indiana Avenu c. Evergreen Road south green interchange. d. Indiana Avenue east the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the Sate Highway Department. This shall include both Phase I and Phase II designs. E00-the proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County £33 Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which established regula- tions for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees in new construction. the proposed plat the applicant shall submit to the county val "Typical" Roadway Cross Secions for the following Aro- n to the propsoed Evergreen intersection. e proposed Evergreen intersection to the connection with the e at the west end of the proposal. of Indiana Avenue, between Indiana and the proposed Ever- of Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus. 2. The typical roadway cross section for the roadway $hich connects the proposed Evergreen Road with the proposed Indiana Avenue in the westerly portion of the plat shall be typ- ical roadway section no. 1 access standard. 3. That the typical roadway cross section for the cul -de -sac which is proposed east of Sul - livan Road and extends Southeasterly from Indiana Avenue shall be typical roadway section no. 1 access standard. 4. That prior to recording of the final plat the Burlington Northern Railroad Line which runs through portions of the proposal on both the east and west sides of Sullivan road, shall be abandoned or relocated. Prior to release of a building permit for those portions of the proposal identified as Phase 1 and the spplicant shall: 1. Obtain permits for roadway construction from the appropriate state and county agencies (Spokane County Engineer). 2. Improve the Sullivan Road intersection in a manner consistant with the approved plans and as set forth in the supplimental environmental impact statement. 3. Construct those roadways which were identified in the supplemental environmental impact statement as being necessary in order to accommodate traffic volumes which will be gener- ated by Phase I. Construction shall be in conformance with the approved roadway plans and typical roadway cross - sections. Roadway construction must be completed prior to the release of building permits or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction improve- ments, construction certification, "as- built" plans, and monumenting the street center- line shall be filed with the County Engineer. 4. Construct a connection to the existing Indiana Avenue which is located to the south and west of the Westerly boundary of the proposed plat. It shall be the applicant's respon- sibility to obtain the necessary right -of -way alignment for this connection. The County Engineer will provide assistance during right -of -way negotiations should it be neces- sary. 2 5. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who ahall furnish the County Engineer with - as-built - plans and a certificate in writing that all improvaements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced: 6. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the en " re`pr oje cct " pri or to the issuance of any building g permit on the property. 7. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan for proposed building sites shall be submit- ted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing, as ap- proved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. 8. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 9. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 10. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended and are appli- cable to this proposal. 11. Should the Phase I development include those portions of the property lying East of Sullivan Road, the applicant will be required to construct the Sullivan Road improvements and interchange modifications which are scheduled for construction in order to accommo- date Phase II of the proposal. 12. That Indiana Avenue East of Sullivan Road shall be constructed per the approved plans and typical roadway cross- section if properties East of Sullivan Road are included in Phase I. 13. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue East of Sullivan Road to function as a private road providing that the roadway is constructed in accordance with Spokane County ' public road standards,,in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross - section. ap 14. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County road right -of -way from the County Engineer. No work will be performed within the County road right -of -way without a permit. 15. If Indiana Avenue East of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the appli- cant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This document provides the following: That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public ' 3 • road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolu- tion No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Seciton 3.07, Sections A and B of that title. 16. That prior to the initiation of Phase II of the proposed development, the applicant will conduct an updated traffic study. This study may be included within the design report which will be prepared for the Evergreen Road Interchange. PHASE II Roadway construction and improvements for Phase II of the proposal shall be consistent with the improvements which have been identified within the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. Those improvements are as follows: 1. Construction and upgrading of the Sullivan Road - Indiana intersection in a manner consis- tent with the plans which have been approved by the Spokane County Engineer and the State of Washington Dept. of Transportation. 2. Construction of new freeway interchange at or near the alignment of Evergreen Road as identified within the Supplemental E.I.S. 3. Construction of Evergreen Road from Indiana Avenue southward to the proposed freeway interchange. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in con- formance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. 4. Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed Evergreen Road) shall be improved to a five -lane facility from Evergreen Road westerly to the conection with the existing Indiana Avenue. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. 5. Indiana Avenue (east of Sullivan Road) shall be constructed as a five -lane facility from Sullivan Road to the Easterly terminus of the project. Indiana shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross -sec- tion. 6. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue East of Sullivan Road to function as a private road, providing that the roadway is constructed in accordance with Spokane County Public Road Standards in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross- section. 7. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County Road right -of -way from the County Engineer. No work will be performed within the County Road right -of -way without a permit. 8. If Indiana Avenue East of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the appli- cant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public'No. 4. This documents provides the following: That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their 4 /• • heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolu- tion No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Seciton 3.07, Sections A and B of that title. 9. Should the Evergreen Interchange Design Report determine that the level of improvements as specified within the Supplemental EIS are not necessary for Phase II, then the County Engineer may approve a phased plan for roadway construction or design deviations for Phase II roadway imorovements. PHASE III 1. The roadway improvements for Phase II as identified within the Supplemental E.I.S. are the connection from the new freeway interchange at Evergreen Road Southward to Mission Avenue and the possible connections Northward and Eastward of the proposal. The need for these improvements will be addressed in the development of the Evergreen Interchange Design Report. The level of improvements, assignment of financial responsibility for improvements and timing of construction will be determined on the basis of traffic volumes, location of facilities, and traffic safety related issues. 2. Phase III improvements as identified 'by the Design Report shall be constructed prior to the commencement of Phase III construction. 5 r TO: FROM: Planning Department County Engineer's Department OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON SUBJECT: Road Conditions* For Plat Name Sullivan Park Center Number PE -1504 *Conditions Apply to Plat Under Consideration October 15 , 1985 E 1 -that conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer is given subject to dedication of Right -of -Way and approval of the road system as indicated in the pre- liminary plat of record. E 2 -that plans, profiles, and cross l;ections as designed to County standards showing pro- posed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. E 3 -that drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facil- ities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. E 4 -that the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be ovserved since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. E11 -that appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1 ft. strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Tem- porary cul -de -sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) E12 -a statement must appear i the dedicatory language of the plat that individual drive- way access permits be re e� Jr. t building approaches to the County ro /system" E14 -a statement shall be placed in dedicatioilMhi at no direct access be allowed from s. '„ a 1. f lots to Sullivan Road. , � , }e 4 , w E17 -that all public roads within the plat be designed•4ar1d constructed to Spokane County standards. E20-the wo sd "a i cc t shall include the owner of owners of the property, his heirs, E24 -that the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal acceptable to the State Highway_ Department of the proposed State Highway- County Road intersection at Sullivan Road- Indiaiia= l{ia State Highway Department approv- al of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the responsibility of the Sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnished to .y. the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the Sate Highway Department. This shall include both Phase I and Phase II designs. E30 -the proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which established regula- tions for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees in new construction. A ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS 1. That prior to finalization of the proposed plat the applicant shall submit to the county Engineer for review and approval "Typical" Roadway Cross Secions for the following pro- posed roadways. a. Indiana Avenue Sullivan to the propsoed Evergreen intersection. b. Indiana Avenue from the proposed Evergreen intersection to the connection with the existing Indiana Avenue at the west end of the proposal. c. Evergreen Road south of Indiana Avenue,. between Indiana and the proposed Ever- green interchange. d. Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus. 2. The typical roadway cross section for the roadway i iihich connects the proposed Evergreen Road with the proposed Indiana Avenue in the westerly portion of the plat shall be typ- ical roadway section no. 1 access standard. 3. That the typical roadway cross section for the cul -de -sac which is proposed east of Sul- livan Road and extends Southeasterly from Indiana Avenue shall be typical roadway section no. 1 access standard. 4. That prior to recording of the final plat the Burlington Northern Railroad Line which runs through portions of the proposal on both the east and west sides of Sullivan road, shall be abandoned or relocated. Prior to release of a building permit for those portions of the proposal identified as Phase I and the spplicant shall: 1. Obtain permits for roadway construction from the appropriate state and county agencies (Spokane County Engineer). 2. Improve the Sullivan Road intersection in a manner consistant with the approved plans and as set forth in the supplimental environmental impact statement. 3. Construct those roadways which were identified in the supplemental environmental impact statement as being necessary in order to accommodate traffic volumes which will be gener- ated by Phase I. Construction shall be in conformance with the approved roadway plans and typical roadway cross - sections. Roadway construction must be completed prior to the release of building permits or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction improve- ments, construction certification, "as- built" plans, and monumenting the street center- line shall be filed with the County Engineer. 4. Construct a connection to the existing Indiana Avenue which is located to the south and west of the Westerly boundary of the proposed plat. It shall be the applicant's respon- sibility to obtain the necessary right -of -way alignment for this connection. The County Engineer will provide assistance during right -of -way negotiations should it be neces- sary. 2 1. . ft 5. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who ahali furnish the County Engineer with "as- built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvaements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced: 6. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entLr-project -- prti f eet 3 prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. 7. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan for proposed building sites shall be submit- ted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing, as ap- proved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. 8. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 9. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 10. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended and are appli- cable to this proposal. 11. Should the Phase I development include those portions of the property lying East of Sullivan Road, the applicant will be required to construct the Sullivan Road improvements and interchange modifications which are scheduled for construction in order to accommo- date Phase II of the proposal. 12. That Indiana Avenue East of Sullivan Road shall be constructed per the approved plans and typical roadway cross- section if properties East of Sullivan Road are included in Phase I. 13. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue East of Sullivan Road to function as a private road providing that the roadway is constructed in accordance with Spokane County public road standards,,in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross - section. 0,4 14. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County road right -of -way from the County Engineer. No work will be performed within the County road right -of -way without a permit. 15. If Indiana Avenue East of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the appli- cant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This document provides the following: That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public 3 G• road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolu- tion No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Seciton 3.07, Sections A and B of that title. 16. That prior to the initiation of Phase II of the proposed development, the applicant will conduct an updated traffic study. This study may be included within the design report which will be prepared for the Evergreen Road Interchange. PHASE II Roadway construction and improvements for Phase II of the proposal shall be consistent with the improvements which have been identified within the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. Those improvements are as follows: 1. Construction and upgrading of the Sullivan Road - Indiana intersection in a manner consis- tent with the plans which have been approved by the Spokane County Engineer and the State of Washington Dept. of Transportation. 2. Construction of new freeway interchange at or near the alignment of Evergreen Road as identified within the Supplemental E.I.S. 3. Construction of Evergreen Road from Indiana Avenue southward to the proposed freeway interchange. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in con- formance with the approved typical roadway cross- section. 4. Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed Evergreen Road) shall be improved to a five -lane facility from Evergreen Road westerly to the conection with the existing Indiana Avenue. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road• plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. 5. Indiana Avenue (east of Sullivan Road) shall be constructed as a five -lane. facility from Sullivan Road to the Easterly terminus of the project. Indiana shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross -sec- tion. 6. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue East of Sullivan Road to function as a private road, providing that the roadway is constructed in accordance with Spokane County Public Road Standards in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross - section. 7. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County Road right -of -way from the County Engineer. No work will be performed within the County Road right -of -way without a permit. 8. If Indiana Avenue East of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the appli- cant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This documents provides the following: That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their 4 PHASE III heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolu- tion No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Seciton 3.07, Sections A and B of that title. 9. Should the Evergreen Interchange Design Report determine that the level of improvements as specified within the Supplemental EIS are not necessary for Phase II, then the County Engineer may approve a phased plan for roadway construction or design deviations for Phase II roadway improvements. 1. The roadway improvements for Phase II as identified within the Supplemental E.I.S. are the connection from the new freeway interchange at Evergreen Road Southward to Mission Avenue and the possible connections Northward and Eastward of the proposal. The need for these improvements will be addressed in the development of the Evergreen Interchange Design Report. - • The level of improvements, assignment of financial responsibility for improvements and timing of construction will be determined on the basis of traffic volumes, location of facilities, and traffic safety related issues. 2. Phase III improvements as identified by the Design Report shall be constructed prior to the commencement of Phase III construction. 5 ES97. WILSEY& HAM 1980 112th Ave. N.E. /Suite 200 Bellevue, RA 98004 -2985 (206) 454 -3250 October 15, 1985 File No. 3 -2705- 0107 -30 Mr. Doug Adams Subdivision Administrator Spokane County Planning Department Broadway Centre Building N. 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 RE: SULLIVAN PARK CENTER Dear Mr. Adams: Following up on our October 8, 1985 review meeting I am forwarding for your use the following data that was requested at the meeting: 1. Duplicate set of project slides. 2. 8 1/2 x 11 exhibits showing proposed roadways (requested by Bob McCann). 3. Three maps illustrating phase 1, 2 and 3 roadway improvements. 4. 8 1/2 x 11 chart which describes phased roadway improvement program. Should you have any questions or need additional information don't hesitate to contact Mike Teramoto or me. Very Truly Yours, Randy J. B1.ir Director • Development Services RJB /djw /A -10 cc: Works Mike Teramoto Mailing Address: P.O. Box C -97304 Bellevue, WA 98009 -7730 SULLIVAN PARK CENTER Summary of Transportation Improvements Phase I • Construct Indiana Avenue as 4 -lane divided boulevard from Sullivan Road west to future Evergreen Road right -of -way • Construct Indiana Avenue as 2 -lane facility from Evergreen right -of -way westward to a connection with existing Indiana Avenue near west property boundary • Signalize intersection of Sullivan /Indiana. • Construct connections from I -90 /Sullivan ramps to Indiana Avenue • Prepare design report for I -90 /Evergreen Interchange Phase II • Construct new I -90 interchange at Evergreen Road • Construct Evergreen Road as a 4 -lane divided boulevard north from 1-90 to Indiana Avenue. • Widen Indiana Avenue to five lanes from Evergreen Road to west property boundary • Construct Indiana Avenue as 5 -lane facility from Sullivan Road to east property boundary. Phase III • Construct Evergreen Road from 1-90 interchange south to Mission Road W1LSEY& HA1'1 e 24 1.2' 24 Median 84' Indiana Ave Boulevard Road Section EXHIBIT: SULLIVAN PARK CENTER f /— landscape Setback Varies WI LSEY&HAM jr Landscape Setbac Varies 44 k 7 F e 70 NOTE: Sidewalk on one side only along railroad ROW at west end of pro ect. Indiana Ave Roadway Section EXHIBIT 2 SULLIVAN PARK CENTER Landscape Setback Varies WILSEY& FIAM Mr.. Randy Hambond Wilsey &,Ham P.0,. Box C- 97304 Bellevue, WA :98009 -7730 Dear:-Randy, , • .' the "'.conditions of approval which have_ .been submitted to the Planning Department for inclusion in their "Planning Report " 'for PE 1504 -85, Sullivan'Park Center. '.These conditions would be incorporated in.the Spokane. County Hearing Examiner Committee's Finding and Order should the proposed plat . be approved. .Please review the conditions'and let me know if you have any questions'.or:comments. I would prefer to address any conceins' prior to the Public '. Hearing -if thatis all possible'. ' ' • Also attached are copies•of the Engineer's right -of -way map'which depicts; the existing'Indiana'Avenue right-of-way 'in Section 10, Township 25 'North, Range'44 E.k:M. The County Assessor's map for the same section is included. Pleas eContact' me.if you have any.questions. • RJM /set -Encl. Very,truly yours, Robert S. Turner, P.E:- .Spokane County Engineer Robert.J. McCann Land Development Coordinator 0 3.19/C NAME OF PROPOSAL: Location: S T N. R Road Applicant: Type of Development: Traffic Counts -3u\\Vac `'c ti∎k 3ioV N- 19. z(a 9 W- z 7d7 - 5(AlUvan T- 90 N- )5 SRg Anticipated A.W.V.T.E. from I.T.E. Manual Existing R.O.W. 1. Street 1. 2. Street 2. 3. Street 3. 4. Street 4. Existing Improvements 1. Street 1. 2. Street 2. 3. Street 3. 4. Street 4. Right of Way Required 1. Street 1. 2. Street 2. 3. Street 3. 4. Street 4. Improvements Needed to Mitigate Traffic Impacts of this Development 1. Street 1. 2. Street 2. 3. Street 3. 4. Street 4. Comments: Liberty Lake SULLIVAN PARK CENTER PE-1504-85 ZE -180-7 8 Location Wilsey & Ham Figure 1 "WEST" SULLIVAN PROPERTY HANSON PROPERTIES, INC. REVISED BY DICK SIMPSON, SIMPSON ENGINEERING, April 17, 1985 A parcel of land North of Interstate 90 and West of Sullivan Road. Begin at the Northeast corner of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 East W.M., situated in Spokane County, Washington thence West 55 feet to the West right=of -way of Sullivan Road and the point of beginning; thence South 0 ° 09'01 "E along the West line of Sullivan Road 151.45 feet; thence South 9 ° 26'14 "W along the West line of Sullivan Road 60 feet; thence South 18 ° 22 1 10 "W along the West line of Sullivan Road 204.61 feet to the North right -of -way line of Interstate 90, thence South 89 ° 50'59 "W along said North right -of -way 918 feet; thence North 74 ° 23'21 "W 3016.83 feet; thence North 73 ° 33'30 "W 1421.34 feet to the East line of Section 10 in Township 25 North, Range 44 East W.M.; thence North 0 ° 07'02 "W 529.63 feet to the NE corner of the SE 1/4 of the SE.1 /4.of said Section 10; thence South 89 ° 58'56 "W along the North line of said SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 a distance of 2171.02 feet to the line of the Mahoney Road Extension #1287; thence following the lines of said road North 21 ° 16'51 "E 23.35 feet; thence North 78 ° 43'09 "W 467.70 feet and North 0 ° 01'46 "W 112.29 feet to the Southerly line of the Spokane International Railroad right -of -way; thence following the lines of said right -of -way North 88 ° 48 1 43 "E 3702.24 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northerly and having a radius of 5779.65 feet; thence Easterly along said curve through a central angle of 13 ° 54'39" an arc distance of 1403.24, feet; thence tangent North 74 ° 54'04 "E 664.22 feet to the Southwesterly line of the Inland Empire Paper Company Railroad right -of -way with a radial bearing of North 56 ° 21'43 "E; thence along said right -of -way being a curve concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 965.37 feet through a central angle of 9 ° 23'17" an arc distance of 158.18 feet; thence tangent South 43 ° 01'34 "E 912.09 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 2874.94 feet; thence Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 11 ° 48'30" an arc distance of 592.51 feet; thence South 35 0 09'56 "W 10.00 feet; thence South 54 ° 50'04 "E 588.15 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 5749.65 feet; thence Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 6 an arc distance of 602.22 feet to the West line of said Sullivan Road, thence South 0 166.95 feet to the point of beginning. "EAST" SULLIVAN PROPERTY HANSON PROPERTIES, INC. REVISED BY DICK SIMPSON, SIMPSON ENGINEERING, APRIL 17, 1985 A parcel of land Northerly of Interstate 90 Freeway East of Sullivan Road. Begin at the Northwest corner of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 East W.M. in Spokane County, Washington; thence South 89 ° 44'22 "E along the North line of said section 75 feet to the point of beginning on the East right -of -way of Sullivan Road; thence South 0 ° 09'01 "E along the East line of Sullivan Road 238.69 feet; thence South 13 °42'18 "E along the East line of Sullivan Road 170.66 feet to the North right -of -way line of Interstate 90; thence North 89 ° 50'59 "E 85 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southwesterly and having a radius of 632.96 feet; thence Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 54 ° 00'00" an are distance of 596.55 feet, thence tangent South 36 ° 09'01 "E 270.5 feet; thence South 60 ° 46'33 "E 313.84 feet; thence South 69 °59'10 "E 951.89 feet; thence South 73 ° 33'30 "E along the North line of I -90 1708.88 feet to the East line of the land described in the Real Estate Contract dated July 17, 1978 and filed in the Office of the Auditor of said County under Auditor's File No. 7807190367; thence North 0 °25'01 "E along said East line 507.05 feet to the North line of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said section; thence South 89 ° 55'52 "E along the North line of the South 1/2 of the said Northeast 1/4 1582.14 feet to the West line of Flora Road; thence North 0 ° 11'30 "W along the West line of Flora Road 128.05 feet to the North right -of -way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence North 78 along the North line of the Burlington Northern Railroad 2734.77 feet to the West line of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 13, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM; thence North 0 ° 39'15 "W along the said West line 20.44 feet; thence North 78 ° 43'09 "W along the North line of Burlington Northern Railroad right -of -way 1318.96 feet to the East line of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM; thence North 0 ° 24'08 "W along the said East line 20.42 feet; thence North 78 ° 43'09 "W along the North line of Burlington Northern Railroad right -of -way 590.69 feet; thence North 61 ° 02'04 "W 737.78 feet to the East right -of -way of Sullivan Road; thence South 0 ° 47'04 "E 91.72 feet to the point of beginning. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM ALL SIGNATURE BLOCKS (CN PAGES 2 AND 3) MUST BE FILLED IN, IF APPROPRIATE, BEFORE RETURNING TO THE PLAT ADMINISTRATOR. Part I - To be completed by applicant and surveyor AREA AND DISTANCE* s********■************ *********** ********** *** *** * * ** ****s* **** *** ** * ** *ss * *$ Total amount of land in this Subdivision: 226± Acres Total Number of Lots 42 Proposed density of the Plat: Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: -0- Acres Proposes Use of controlled adjoining land: not a p p l i c a b l e What is the driving distance in miles to the nearest fire station? one - half mile Shopping facilities? ±2 Municipal Boundary: ±3 Paved street or highway adjacent to Sellivan Road and I -90. LAND USE Comprehensive Plan Category: Indicate the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings ( ). Duplexes ( ). Indicate lots for duplexes: Multi - family dwelling units ( ). Indicate which lots: Mobile Homes ( ). Other ( X ). Describe other uses:COmmercial, Business, & Industrial Describe any non - residential use proposed in the Plat: Commercial, Industrial, Business and open space What is the present use of the property proposed to be platted? List type of uses: Cultivated land: acres. Pasture: Timber: acres. Vacant: 226± acres. Other: Is keeping of animals desired? No ( X ). Yes ( ). Type: EXHIBIT B 0.19 Lots /Gross Acre vacant acres. Proposed Loninc• Commercial, Local Business, Restricted Industrial & Agriculture IMPRovulENTS ** ** **s * * s**********ss****** ***** s ************t * *** **** ****** ***** ** Alt Bus *** ness, Community Business, Industrial Park & General Do you plan to f il e i th e l Fla t In its entirety as proposed, or will it be a multi - phase deve- lopment? multi - phase development To what level of improvement will streets be constructed? Gravel ( ) - Minimum. Curb and Gravel ( ). Curb and Paved ( X ). Paved only ( ). Describe any combinations of above: What is the time period expected for complete development of the Plat: 10 - fears Street improvements completed? 2-10 yrs. Substantial number of lots occupied? 3:15 yrs. Is dedication of any land for public use contempleted? (Parks, schools, etc.) No. ( X). Yes ( ). Describe: Indicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: Number of bedroomsnot applicable • development Estimated Sale Price not applicable Square feet not applicable not Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No ( ). Yes ( )• applicable Will any special deed restrictions be included in the sale of lots? No ( ). Yes ( X ). If ''yes ", explain: Coy d i L i o n s , covenants and r e s t r i c t i o n s w i l l apply to UTILITIES ss*sss* ss*** s** s********** s*s**** s*s** s*** s*ss******* **ss***s**** ****** ** **s*****.s* Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank ( ). Lagoon ( ). Treatment plant ( ). Other, or combinations (Describe) Public sewers Indicate the proposed source of water supply: Individual wells ( ). Public system ( X ). Private community system ( ). Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings): Underground utility easements ( X ). Overhead utility easements ( ). Utilities in streets ( X )• No easements ( ). - OVER- Indicate the distance from this proposal to the nearest existing water main: j mile feet Indicate size of nearest main: 20 inches. Acres UTILITIES - (Continued) List utility companies or districts expected to provide send-Pe c to his Plat: Electricity: WWP Co. & .Gas: WWP Co. Water: Consolidated ph : Pacific NW Bel Inlana Nower ACKNOWLEDGMENTS PROPOSED PLAT NAME: A. This subdivision B. We are omesti C. Sa is ac ory arrange D. Signature (only whe E. Private (wel s) (wat er sy tem) i L/ purveyors name PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) NOTARY Sullivan Park Center E X H I B I E A y IV I, the undersigned, have completed the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat is einq prepa by me under my supervision in accordance with the'requirements of the Spokane County�. yg�al�' partment and the laws the S ate of ashingtin. • _ „.. StLy �� `i; (Signed) ate: 5 S -3- — • • y • -e �� (Address) Q , / Phone: (WO 4Sf- 3ZS0 *The \ � O � aEO ait 5 t t..E a._ zip: 47R•00? titled zoning /lot layout represents a generalized lot layout for the proper% l flop iminary plat map is currently being prepared & will be consistent with this SURVEYO +: ; plans layout. I, the undersigned,'swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I further swear that I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD of the. site-proposed as the preliminary plat, or, if not the owner, attached here- with is written peraission from said'owner authorizing my actions on his or her behalf. I also understand, , -could there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack or full j_., disclosure on mpart, = S'okane County may withdraw any declaration of non. significance that it Might issue in re;i.iance upon this checklist. HAf?SON PRF� ERTIES, INC. : , Ct• ig res1den (Address) N. 8700'Crestline Date: April 30, 1985 Phone: 467 -0770 Spokane, WA. Zip: 99207 / 1 .� 0 i.,n� Date: 44.:‘ 30 /fir " L. Creason Residing therein at Spokane Part II - to be completed by water purveyor -- See PART VI abl s ■ l of ab I i (is not) situated within our service area. __an • willing to pply this subdivision ndustrial commerci men ve) awe no t signature -.d title water source. Page 2 with adequate water for S /fie_-/ <ef date Part III -to be completed by Health District ,wr A. Health District staff hasAcompleted a field investigation of the site. B. Health strict requirements for preliminary plats Jss•eve have not been satisfied. C. Signa • 1J E X H I B I T A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) Page 3 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Part IV - To be completed by County Engineers Office A. County Engineers Office requirements for preliminary plats - hav -e (have not).b.een satisfied subject to submission and approval of drainage calculations and drainage plan. B. Signature S/ 6 /R5 Date * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Part V - To be completed by County Utilities Dept. A. County Utilities Department requirements for preliminary plat have (have not) been satisfied. B. Signature s1l G /84r Date * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Part VI - To be completed by County Building E Safety A. Fire Flow of -4 gallons per minute required for proposal. St TG - 1c rca en C7 F6¢Ea 3T2 c c agi e/and t i te/ THIS PART TO BE COMPLETED BY SPOKANE COUNTYPLANNINT DEPARTMENT Planning Department Information School District: Fire District: Water District: Checked by: Date Submitted: . Preliminary Plat Fee: Date Accepted: Checklist Fee: E /,S Plat File No: • 7 1 Zone Change File No: ZE- /f9-77 Plat Name: S tc /tZ4.4/ pK e Existing Zoning: Number of Lots: yL Date Established: Location: Sec. T R Advertised Zone Change: 1 Comp. Plan Category: PSSA bdry: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Deros 2 raj Inter- office Communication To M15,E'( nn From // tai Subject / /#yea ' 'ay /T /✓o !%E - QOM %,J-•ve we CA I D,EtC7 WIC dt5/1 'y a� 77 C 4S5/6/1)ED Tuavf - at) L-Y /1-04/ 5* — we- dw✓ o Z ,10 to /-tis c,tio.cE , Sc-r- n s /4 5fo04 S / O,) 6 7 Stc.Ec7 74a /»ties nce Tiat - 4 ; /001A -z. aS lifj14 o 46 i b,7 4//L ,O✓tr ubo4c) h /0C WC SAM 02-0 douSu j w'Tf! 'eG ,e t 6tacl O AL A& Form 327 —C.R. OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON C� Date I - 19// 247 75224- For security purposes only, R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation, hereby assigns to SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, the following: U.S. Government Obligations, Saloman Government Backed Repurchase Agreement, or other investments as approved by the parties hereto, in the face amount of $1,906,470.00 and held in and by Seattle First National Bank, Dated this Dated in rL7 ickirr_ This Assignment is made as security for the full and faithful performance by R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. of the construction of certain roads, drainage swales, landscaping, sprinkler system and street lighting, as specified in the typical section and roadway improvement specifications for said subdivision, dated April 17, 1990 and on file in the Office of the County Engineer, and the landscape plans for said subdivision dated April 12, 1990, and on file in the Office of the County Planning Department. Any interest benefits accruing shall remain the property of R.A. investment funds are to be released or any other party only with the agreement of Spokane County. PROVIDED, the undersigned does hereby authorize Seattle First National Bank to pay over to Spokane County all or a sufficient portion of the moneys in the investment funds referenced hereinabove upon written documentation being received from Spokane County indicating that the purposes for which the investment funds were assigned have not been fully and faithfully performed as required and a statement of that amount of money which the County deems necessary to complete such obligation. Upon receipt of such written documentation, R.A. Hanson Company hereby authorizes Seattle First National Bank to release to Spokane County that,amount of money requested up to the maximum amount in the investment funds account. PROVIDED, FURTHER, that R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. shall have the right to direct the investment of the funds which are subject to this Assignment, and, therefore, this Assignment shall be effective as to any such investment account this 9 r4 d ay APPROVED AS TO FORM: SPOKANE COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE By ASSIGNMENT day of May, 1990. SEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL BANK By under said investment funds Hanson Company, Inc. Said to R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. prior written consent and G 4-4747 of May, 1990. R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. By �• t i � / R.A. Hanson — President C IE SEAFIRST Barbara A. Johnson Trust Officer Trust Business Escrows (206) 358 -1748 (206) 358 -0080 (facsimile) September 24, 1991 Spokane County Prosecutor Attn: Michael Dempsey W 1100 Mallon Public Safety Building Spokane, WA 99260 RECEIVED OCT 0 2 1991 SPOKANE CGIh't1-y ENGINEER RECEIVED SEP 2 6 1991 PROSCECUUTINO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION Re: Trust Escrow account 724 - 336175 & 336176: Hanson/Price Improvement Fund Hanson/Price County Fund Dear Sirs, This letter has been sent to inform you of the decision by Seafirst's management to suspend using the Salomon Brothers Master Repurchase Agreement as a short term cash management investment vehicle in trust accounts for which Seafirst has investment authority. This decision was reached due to the current uncertainty surrounding Salomon Brothers and because we have the ability to obtain other repurchase agreement lines with comparable rates and collateral from other primary dealers. Since you have investment authority over the escrow account(s), you may wish to review your use of Salomon Brothers Master Repo as an investment vehicle. If you no longer wish to retain the Salomon Brothers Master Repo, we will need from you direction as to which investment vehicle you wish us to use for these funds. We currently have available comparable, but not identical, repurchase agreement lines with The First Boston Corp. and with Barclays de Zoete Wedd Securities Inc. An informational sheet on each of these master repos is enclosed. Please feel free to discuss with me any investment you wish to make. Upon receipt of your direction, we will verify that your chosen investment complies with the escrow agreements. In any event, whether you wish to retain the Salomon Brothers Master repo or not, we recommend that you select a secondary investment vehicle for our use in the event that your primary choice is or becomes unavailable. Please return the attached investment direction forrn, in the envelope provided, indicating your direction to retain or sell the Salomon Brothers Master Repurchase Agreement line and your secondary investment vehicle choice. If you direct us to retain the investment you may wish to continue to monitor Salomon Brothers, Inc. Seafirst Bank 1001 Fourth Avenue, Eleventh Floor /Seattle, Washington 98154 Cy SEAriRSr PLEASE COMPLETE AND RETURN IN THE PROVIDED ENVELOPE Re: Trust Escrow accounts 724 - 336175 & 336176: Hanson/Price Improvement Fund Hanson/Price County Fund I hereby direct Seafirst Bank to continue to utilize the Salomon Brothers Master Repo: yes no If you indicated no above, please complete the following: I hereby direct Seafirst Bank to sell the Salomon Brothers Master Repo and invest in the following: The First Boston Corp. Master Repo (U.S.Treasuries and GNMAs) Barclays de Zoete Wedd Securities Inc. Master Repo (U.S. Treasuries, 5 year maturities or less) (Other -- please specify) Please indicate a secondary choice for Seafirst Bank to use in the event that your choice above is or becomes unavailable: The First Boston Corp. Master Repo (U.S.Treasuries and GNMAs) Barclays de Zoete Wedd Securities Inc. Master Repo (U.S. Treasuries, 5 year maturities or less) (Other -- please specify) Signature: Name & Title: Date: Spokane County Prosecutor Description of Issuer The former publicly- traded First Boston, Inc. (created 1932) was merged in December 1988 in an agreement with Financiere Credit Suisse -First Boston and Credit Suisse Holding, an associate of Credit Suisse. Currently, CS First Boston (the parent company of all the "First Boston" entities) is 64% owned by CS Holding. CS Holding is economically controlled by Credit Suisse. The balance of the firm is owned by management and a group of institutional investors. This privately owned firm will be one of the most dominant global players in the investment banking business. First Boston is a Primary Dealer. The Master Repo with The First Boston Corporation Delivery - Safekeeping Banks - Manufacturers Hanover P -2 Moody's, A -2 S &P (Short Term Deposit) Baal Moody's, A- S &P (Long Term Deposit) Collateral - Cash, U.S. Treasuries and GNMA Pass - Through Securities. GNMAs at 103% mean, Treasuries at 102% bid pricing. The Government National Mortgage Association is a wholly owned government corporation within the Department of Housing and Urban Development. GNMAPass- Through Securities bear the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Tri-Partv Legal Agreement - The Master Repo is further secured by awritten contract binding the Dealer, the Safekeeping Banks and Seafirst Bank's Trust Department. Rate - Not less than Fed Funds minus 10.0 basis points. May include term. Call (206) 358 -1144 for current day's rate. Dealer - The First Boston Corporation Financial Rating - Stockholders' Equity - Ratios - THE A IRST BOSTON CORPORATION Securities are transferred to Seafirst Bank's Trust Department account at Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. in New York City which assures collateral control and verification, and perfects a security interest in the collateral. CS First Boston, Inc. (Parent) P -1 Moody's, A -1 S &P (Short Term Debt) A3 Moody's, A- S &P (Subordinated Long Term Debt) Credit - Suisse (Parent's Economic Parent) P -1 Moody's, A-1+ S&P (Short Term Debt) Aaa Moody's, AAA S &P (Long Term Debt) 5707 million 12/31/90 (Parent) Stockholders' Equity/Total Assets 1.9% 12/31/90 (Parent) 7/91 Description of Issuer Barclays de Zoete Wedd Securities Inc. (BZWSI) is a registered government securities broker and dealer. They are owned by Barclays USA Inc. (80.1 %) and Barclays de Zoete Wedd Holdings Limited (19.9 %). Both of these firms are wholly owned by Barclays Bank PLC. Barclays Bank PLC is the largest bank in Britain and 12th largest in the world (ranked by asset size as of year end 1990) and maintains a solid Aaa /AA+ rating by both Moody's and S &P, respectively. BZWSI is a Primary Dealer The Master Repo with Barclays de Zoete Wedd Securities Inc. Delivery - Safekeeping Banks - Collateral - 102% daily bid pricing. Cash and U.S. Treasuries. Tri-Partv Legal Agreement - Rate - Dealer - Barclays de Zoete Wedd Securities Inc. Financial Rating - Stockholders' Equity - Ratios - THE MASTER REPO BARCLAYS BANK PLC Securities are transferred to Seafirst Bank's Trust Department account at Security Pacific National Trust Company in New York City, which assures collateral control and verification, and perfects a security interest in the collateral. Security Pacific National Bank P -1 Moody's, A -1 S &P (Short Term Deposit) Al Moody's, A S &P (Long Term Deposit) The Master Repo is further secured by a written contract binding the Dealer, the Safekeeping Bank and Seafirst Bank's Trust Department. The rate will be the highest market rate available for subject securities. Call (206) 358 -1144 for current day's rate. Barclays Bank PLC (Parent's Parent) Aaa Moody's, AA+ S &P (Long Term Debt) P -1 Moody's, A -1+ S &P (Short Term Debt) $102.0 million 12/31/90 (Dealer) Stockholders' Equity /Total Assets 1.4% 12/31/90 (Dealer) 8/91 SALOMON BROTHERS INC. - MASTER REPO Description of Dealer Salomon Brothers Inc. is an international investment banking firm wholly owned by. Salomon Brothers Holding Company Inc. which makes markets in securities as principal and agent and provides a broad range of underwriting, research and financial services to institutional investors, corporations and government entities. Incorporated in 1960, Salomon Brothers Inc. is a member of the New York Stock Exchange and subject to their capital requirements. Salomon Brothers was originally founded in 1910, and has been a Primary Dealer since 1917. Salomon is the oldest reporting dealer, and dominates the U.S. Governmeht Securities markets. The Master Repo with Salomon Brothers Delivery Safekeeping Bank Securities Tri -Party Legal Agreement Rate Financial Rating Securities are delivered to Seafirst Bank's Trust Department account at Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company in New York City. A perfected security interest is created by possession of the securities. Manufacturer's Hanover Trust Company's short term debt is rated A -2 and P -2 by Standard & Poor's Corp. and Moody's Investors Services, Inc. respectively. Long term debt is rated A- and Baal by Standard and Poor's and Moody's respectively. Eligible securities - cash, U.S. Treasuries with maturities no longer than five years. Securities are priced daily and must have a market value of at least 103% of the repo investment. U. S. Treasuries are direct obligations of and are guaranteed as to the payment of principal and interest by the U.S. Government. The Master Repo exists by virtue of a written contract binding the Dealer, the Safekeeping Bank and Seafirst Bank's Trust Department. The rate is negotiated daily; call (206) 358 -1141 for current day's rate. A -1 by S &P, P -1 by Moody's (Short Term Debt); A+ by S &P, Al by Moody's (Long Term Debt) NO. BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF EXECUTING A SATISFACTION OF CONDITIONS AGREEMENT WITH HANSON, INDUSTRIES, INC. Page 1 oft RESOLUTION WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW Section 36.32.120(6), the Board of County Commis- sioners of Spokane County has the care of County property and the management of County funds and business; and WHEREAS, on October 13, 1998, under Spokane County Resolution No. 98 -0829, the COUNTY executed a Agreement whereby HANSON AND SPOKANE MALL upon joint execution of the Agreement agreed to provide certain moneys to Spokane County in exchange for Spokane County agreeing that certain Conditions of Approval recommended by the Spokane County Engineering Department ONLY within the Conditions of Approval for PE- 1504 -85 and ZE- 180 -78, namely Nos. 1, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, and 46 with condition No. 39 separately addressed, adopted under Resolution No. 86 -0265, including but not necessarily Limited to the construction of the Evergreen Interchange, Evergreen Connector to Mission, and Evergreen Road south to Sprague Avenue, Indiana Avenue (with all infrastructure improvements) from Pines Road to approximately 715 lineal feet east of Sullivan Road, the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Sullivan Road, the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Pines Road, as well as Condition No. 1 under COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS CONDITIONS within BSP- 48 -96, to the extent that it adopts the above referenced conditions, have been satisfied. WHEREAS, SPOKANE MALL and HANSON, at the present time, are trying to resolve some issues relative to their respective obligations under the Agreement executed by the COUNTY under Resolution No. 98 -0829 accordingly, SPOKANE MALL is unable to execute the Agreement although HANSON has executed the Agreement so that it can obtain building permits under in excess of 95,000 square feet for Market Point 1 within PE- 1504 -78 and ZE- 180 -78; and WHEREAS, HANSON has proposed that until SPOKANE MALL executes the Agreement executed by the COUNTY under Resolution No. 98 -0829, HANSON will provide $5.2 million dollars to Spokane County in exchange for Spokane County agreeing that certain Conditions of Approval recommended by the Spokane County Engineering Department ONLY within the Conditions of Approval for PE- 1504 -85 and ZE- 180 -78, namely Nos. 1, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, and 46 nvith condition No. 39 separately addressed, adopted under Resolution No. 86 -0265, including but not necessarily limited to the construction of the Evergreen Interchange, Evergreen Connector to Mission, and Evergreen Road south to Sprague Avenue, Indiana Avenue (with all infrastructure improvements) from Pines Road to approximately 715 lineal feet east of Sullivan Road, the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Sullivan Road, the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Pines Road with the clear understanding that in providing said moneys this will not enable SPOKANE MALL to obtain any building permits for any Gross Area in excess of 650,000 square feet for BSP -48 -96 (later increased to 715,000 square feet) until SPOKANE MALL executes said Agreement passed by the COUNTY under Resolution No. 98 -0829; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY does not want to forestall the issuance of building permits to HANSON in excess of 95,000 square feet for Market Point 1 within PE- 1504 -78 and ZE- 180 -78 and accordingly is desirous of entering into an agreement with HANSON as proposed in the immediately preceding recital. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, that either the Chairman of the Board, or a majority of the Board, be and is hereby authorized to execute that document entitled "SATISFACTION OF CONDITIONS AGREEMENT," pursuant to which, under certain terms and conditions, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County will execute an Agreement with Hanson Industries, Inc. (HANSON) wherein HANSON will provide $5.2 million dollars to Spokane County in exchange for Spokane County agreeing that certain Conditions of Approval recommended by the Spokane County Engineering Department ONLY within the Conditions of Approval for PE- 1504 -85 and ZE- 180 -78, namely Nos. I, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, and 46 with condition No. 39 separately addressed, adopted under Resolution No. 86 -0265, including but not necessarily limited to the construction of the Evergreen Interchange, Evergreen Connector to Mission, and Evergreen Road south to Sprague Avenue, Indiana Avenue (with all infrastructure improvements) from Pines Road to approximately 715 lineal feet east of Sullivan Road, the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Sullivan Road, the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Pines Road with the clear understanding that in providing said moneys this will not enable SPOKANE MALL to obtain any building permits for any Gross Area in excess of 650,000 square feet for BSP -48 -96 (later increased to 715,000 square feet) until SPOKANE MALL executes said Agreement passed by the COUNTY under Resolution No. 98 -0829. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE, Clerk oe- : • d By: i wale Ava • 11 1• • 1 air S IN, Vice -Chair Page 2 of 2 98 lJL16•/ PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of / }ewa, -J)e71998. LA 7 CKSON Deputy Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF • 6 • COUNTY, WASHINGTON JOHN,l20SKELLEY (resmanson.itx) Return to: t 0s) 6 SATISFACTION OF CONDITIONS AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered this day of , 1998, by and between Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington having offices for the transaction of business at 1116 \Vest Broadway, Spokane Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY," and Hanson Industries, Inc., having offices for the transaction of business at 15102 East Indiana Avenue. Spokane, \Vashington, 99216, hereinafter referred to as "I hereinafter referred to as the "PARTIES." WIT NESSET11: WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of chapter 36.70 RCW, chapter 58.17 RCW and local County ordinances adopted pursuant thereto, the County has the statutory obligation to guide and regulate the physical development of the unincorporated areas of Spokane County, including but not necessarily limited to the approval of subdivisions, zone changes, and binding site plans; and WHEREAS, on the 25t day of March, 1986, under Spokane County Resolution No. 86 -0265, HANSON received approval from the COUNTY for a mixed use development on an approximate 226 -acre site to include an accompanying rezone, having a Spokane County Planning Department File designation of PE- 1504 -85 and ZE- I80 -78; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with the approval of PE- 1504 -85 and ZE- 180 -78. HANSON was required to meet certain conditions of approval which were broken down into three (3) phases, Namely Phase I, Phase II and Phase III; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the approval of PE- 1504 -85 and ZE- 180 -78, HANSON sold a portion of the property which was the subject of such approval to SPOKANE MALL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Utah Limited partnership; hereinafter referred to as SPOKANE MALL; and WI-IEREAS, under Spokane County Resolution No. 96 -0338, that portion of the property which was the subject of approval under Spokane County Resolution No. 86 -0265 and which was sold by HANSON to SPOKANE MALL received approval of a Binding Site Plan, BSP- 48 -96; and Satisfaction of Conditions Agreement Page I of 9 WHEREAS, the Final Environmental Impact Statement and Supplemental thereto for PE- 1504 -85 and ZE- I80 -78, approved under Resolution No. 86 -0265, provided that development of the property would occur in three (3) general phases, with Phase 11 not proceeding until roadway construction and improvements set forth under Conditions of Approval recommended by the Spokane County Engineering Department and made a part of the County's approval were satisfied, which conditions mean that no building permit would be issued for any Gross Leasable Area in excess of 650,000 square feet (later increased to 715,000 square feet) for BSP -48 -96 and no building permit would be issued for any Gross Area in excess of 95,000 square feet for Market Point 1 (as calculated on the conversion of a planned hotel site within Phase I to retail uses) within PE- 1504 -78 and ZE- 180 -78; and WHEREAS, BSP- 48 -96, approved under Resolution No. 96 -0338, included various conditions to include Condition No. 1 under COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS CONDITIONS which provides: The applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval for Spokane County Zone Change ZE- 180 -78 and the conditions imposed as part of the finalization of PE- 1504 -85. Additionally, all environmental documents under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) applicable to this project. WHEREAS, HANSON desires to enter into an Agreement whereby it wiII provide certain moneys to Spokane County in exchange for Spokane County agreeing that certain Conditions of Approval recommended by the Spokane County Engineering Department ONLY within the Conditions of Approval for PE- 1504 -85 and ZE- 180 -78, namely Nos. 1, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, and 46 with condition No. 39 separately addressed, adopted under Resolution No. 86 -0265, including but not necessarily limited to the construction of the Evergreen Interchange, Evergreen Connector to Mission, and Evergreen Road south to Sprague Avenue, Indiana Avenue (with all infrastructure improvements) from Pines Road to approximately 715 lineal feet east of Sullivan Road, the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Sullivan Road, the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Pines Road, have been satisfied; and WHEREAS, on October 13, 1998, under Spokane County Resolution No. 98 -0829, the COUNTY executed an Agreement whereby HANSON AND SPOKANE MALL upon joint execution of the Agreement agreed to provide certain moneys to Spokane County in exchange for Spokane County agreeing that certain Conditions of Approval recommended by the Spokane County Engineering Department ONLY within the Conditions of Approval for PE- 1504 -85 and ZE- 180 -78, namely Nos. I, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, and 46 with condition No. 39 separately addressed, adopted under Resolution No. 86 -0265, including but not necessarily limited to the construction of the Evergreen Interchange, Evergreen Connector to Mission, and Evergreen Road south to Sprague Avenue, Indiana Avenue (with all infrastructure improvements) from Pines Road to approximately 715 lineal feet east of Sullivan Road, the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Sullivan Road, the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Pines Road, as well as Condition No. 1 under COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROAD CONDITIONS within BSP- 48 -96, to the extent that it adopts the above referenced conditions, have been satisfied. Satisfaction of Conditions Agreement Page 2 of 9 WHEREAS, SPOKANE MALL and HANSON, at the present time, are trying to resolve some issues relative to their respective obligations under the Agreement executed by the COUNTY under Resolution No. 98 -0829 accordingly, SPOKANE MALL is unable to execute the Agreement although HANSON has executed the Agreement so that it can obtain building permits under in excess of 95,000 square feet for Market Point 1 within PE- 1504 -78 and ZE- 180 -78; and WHEREAS, HANSON has proposed that until SPOKANE MALL executes the Agreement executed by the COUNTY under Resolution No. 98 -0829, HANSON will provide $5.2 million dollars to Spokane County in exchange for Spokane County agreeing that certain Conditions of Approval recommended by the Spokane County Engineering Department ONLY within the Conditions of Approval for PE- 1504 -85 and ZE- 180 -78, namely Nos. 1, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, and 46 with condition No. 39 separately addressed, adopted under Resolution No. 86 -0265, including but not necessarily limited to the construction of the Evergreen Interchange, Evergreen Connector to Mission, and Evergreen Road south to Sprague Avenue, Indiana Avenue (with all infrastructure improvements) from Pines Road to approximately 715 lineal feet east of Sullivan Road, the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Sullivan Road, the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Pines Road with the clear understanding that in providing said moneys this will not enable SPOKANE MALL to obtain any building permits for any Gross Area in excess of 650,000 square feet for BSP -48 -96 (later increased to 715,000 square feet) until SPOKANE MALL executes said Agreement passed by the COUNTY under Resolution No. 98 -0829; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY does not want to forestall the issuance of building permits to HANSON in excess of 95,000 square feet for Market Point I within PE- 1504 -78 and ZE- 180 -78 and accordingly is desirous of entering into an agreement with HANSON as proposed in the immediately preceding recital. NOW' THEREFORE for and in consideration of the mutual promises set forth hereinafter and the Parties do hereby agree as follows: SECTION NO. L: INCORPORATION OF RECITALS Each of the Recital paragraphs is incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth again in full and made a part of this Agreement. SECTION NO. 2: SATISFACTION OF CONDITIONS (a) The COUNTY agrees that all conditions of approval included under the terminology "County Engineer Department" ONLY within the Conditions of Approval for PE- 1504 -85 and ZE- 180 -78, namely Nos. 1, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, and 46 with condition No. 39 separately addressed, in conjunction with PE- 1504 -85 and ZE- 180 -78, adopted under Spokane County Resolution No. 86 -0265, including but not necessarily limited to the construction of the Evergreen Interchange, Evergreen Connector to Mission, and Evergreen Road south to Sprague Avenue, Indiana Avenue (with all infrastructure improvements) from Pines Road to approximately 715 lineal feet east of Sullivan Road, the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Sullivan Road, the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Pines Road, a copy of such Resolution being attached hereto as Attachment "A" and incorporated herein by reference, have been met and /or satisfied by HANSON. Satisfaction of Conditions Agreement Page 3 of 9 4 l (b) In consideration of the COUNTY agreeing to the provisions set forth in Section No. 2(a) hereinabove, HANSON shall initially deposit with the COUNTY by bond, letter of credit, cash or other lawful U.S. currency the sum of FIVE MILLION TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5,200,000.00). Upon deposit of the estimated contribution by I-IANSON, the COUNTY is authorized to draw upon the funds contributed at any time. For the purposes of this Agreement, the terminology "Project" shall refer to the Evergreen Interchange, Evergreen Connector to Mission and Evergreen Road south to Sprague Avenue, Indiana Avenue (with all infrastructure improvements) from Pines Road to approximately 715 lineal feet east of Sullivan Road, the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Sullivan Road. the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Pines Road. In addition to the financial contribution by I for the Project, HANSON agrees to dedicate at no cost to the COUNTY the land needed for right of way as shown on the document entitled "Preliminary Plat for Sullivan Park Center" dated May 15, 1985, which was digitized to describe the right of way necessary for Evergreen Interchange north of 1 -90 and its connection to Indiana. This right of way is calculated to be 321,639.97 square feet. A copy of the Preliminary Plat for Sullivan Park Center" dated May 15, 1985, and digitization describing the right of way necessary for Evergreen Interchange north of 1 -90 and its connection to Indiana is attached hereto as Attachment "B" and incorporated herein by reference. I IANSON also agrees to dedicate land under its ownership and /or control or HANSON shall acquire and dedicate the land needed for the "expanded right of way." The terminology "expanded right of way" shall mean the difference in the total amount of area between "Preliminary Plat of Record" dated May 15, 1985, which was digitized to describe the right of way necessary for Evergreen Interchange north of 1 -90 and its connection to Indiana and the final Project design as shown on the Final Right Of Way And Limited Access Plan designed by Washington State Department of Transportation for the Evergreen Road Interchange approved December 23, 1997, a copy of said document being attached hereto as Attachment "C" and incorporated herein by reference approved under Resolution No. 96 -0338 or the ultimate design as approved and /or constructed for the Evergreen Road Interchange, which ever is less. The COUNTY agrees to compensate HANSON for the value of the "expanded right of way" under its ownership and /or control or having been acquired after final acceptance of the Project. The value of such "expanded right of way" shall be determined by an MAI appraiser jointly selected by the Parties. HANSON'S compensation shall be in the form of credit firstly applied to his responsibility, if any, for an additional financial contribution toward the Project as provided for hereinafter, and secondly toward HANSON'S responsibility for public infrastructure improvements as a result of his future developments. Provided, however, the COUNTY and HANSON may mutually agree to exchange COUNTY property in lieu of credit toward HANSON'S responsibility for public infrastructure improvements. For the purposes of this Agreement public infrastructure improvements shall mean traffic, transportation, utilities, and public roadway drainage improvements as well as right -of -way costs. Additionally. HANSON and the COUNTY agree that if the Washington State Department of Transportation allows use by HANSON of WSDOT property in conjunction with HANSON'S development under PE- 1504 -85 and ZE- 180 -78, that the COUNTY will receive credit against any moneys owing to HANSON under the terms of this Agreement. The value of the use of the WSDOT property shall be determined in the same manner as the value of the "expanded right of way" provided for herein. Satisfaction of Conditions Agreement Page 4 of 9 4'0 The bond or other securities provided by HANSON shall be valid for five (5) years or completion of the Project. If these funds are not utilized 'Within five (5) years or the completion of the Project from the date of deposit, any unused funds or portion of bonds shall be returned to HANSON. The PARTIES acknowledge that a combination of funds from HANSON, Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), the Washington State Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) and the COUNTY will be used to construct the Project. The COUNTY originally estimated that HANSON'S financial obligation toward the Project would approximate FIVE MILLION TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5,200,000.00). HANSON under the terms of this Agreement only is assuming this joint financial obligation. This figure did not include the cost of the "expanded right of way." The PARTIES agree that the actual contribution of HANSON will be determined by the COUNTY after final acceptance of the Project. At that time, the total cost of the Project will be determined solely by the COUNTY. The cost of the Project will include the value of the "expanded right of way." The COUNTY will then allocate thirty -eight percent (38 %) of the costs of the Project to HANSON. This percentage has been agreed to by the Parties as the proportionate share of the Project which is the sole responsibility of HANSON. In the event HANSON'S initial financial contribution toward the Project is less than its percentage share as determined hereinabove, HANSON shall be liable for paying the COUNTY the additional funds due within thirty (30) days of notification by the COUNTY of such amount. In the event the COUNTY owes HANSON any consideration for the "expanded right of way" this amount may be a credit against any additional funds due. In the event HANSON'S initial financial contribution toward the Project exceeds its actual share as determined by the COUNTY hereinabove, the COUNTY shall provide HANSON with credit toward its responsibility for public infrastructure improvements as a result of its future developments, exclusive of Condition No. 39 addressed in subsection (e) hereinafter. HANSON'S credit shall be equal to the amount which is owed to HANSON for the "expanded right of way," plus the difference between its initial financial contribution and its final financial contribution as determined by the COUNTY hereinabove. (c) The COUNTY agrees that it shall not, through the Spokane County Engineer, require any additional conditions in conjunction with any extension of time(s) applied for and /or approved with regard to PE -1504- 85 and ZE- 180 -78. (d) The COUNTY agrees that it will apply the same square footage calculations for determining Gross Leasable Area for HANSON in conjunction with PE- 1504 -84 and ZE- 180 -78 that it has used with regard to Spokane Mall with stand alone pads and, to the extent applicable, the Spokane Industrial Park. Both Parties agree to negotiate in good faith to the extent that there may occur any disagreements as to these and other issues relative to PE- 1504 -85 and ZE- 180 -78. Satisfaction of Conditions Agreement Page 5 of 9 (e) Condition No. 39, and referenced hereinabove, provides as follows: 39. Indiana Avenue (east of Sullivan Road) shall be constructed as a five -lane facility from Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus of the Project. Indiana shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. The COUNTY agrees that HANSON has the sole responsibility to satisfy this condition and it can be done in the following manner. If Indiana Avenue, east of Sullivan Road, is constructed to a design standard approved b the Spokane County Engineer for a public roadway, HANSON or his /her successors shall . dedicate, at no charge to the COUNTY, all necessary right of way and shall be solely responsible for funding of all design and construction costs. The COUNTY agrees to use its best efforts to secure grant funding to construct an extension of Indiana Avenue east from Sullivan Road to Flora Road and /or Mission Road. However, the parties hereto agree that the COUNTY is in no way obligated to financially contribute to such extension. HANSON agrees to permit the COUNTY to leverage its privately funded improvements for public grant funding requests. SECTION NO. 3: TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE The Parties agree that time is of the essence in conjunction with the provisions of this Agreement. In the event HANSON does not make a one -time payment of $5.2 million dollars, as referred to in Section No. 2(b), within thirty (30) days of the execution of the Agreement by the COUNTY this Agreement shall automatically terminate without - the necessity of any action by either Party. The parties agree that until HANSON makes the one -tine payment as provided for within this Section, no building permit(s) will be issued for any Gross Area in excess of 95,000 square feet for Market Point I (as calculated on the conversion ofa planned hotel site within Phase I to retail uses) within PE- 1504 -78 and ZE- 180 -78. It is agreed that Condition No. 1 under County Division of Engineering and Road Condition within BSP -48- 96 is not satisfied by this Agreement. Condition No. 1 kvithin BSP -48 -96 shall be satisfied by a separate Agreement between SPOKANE MALL and HANSON or by SPOKANE MALL executing that Agreement executed by the COUNTY under Resolution No. 98 -0829. In the event the SPOKANE MALL executes that Agreement executed by the COUNTY under Resolution No. 98 -0829, this Agreement shall automatically terminate, and the provisions of the Agreement executed by the COUNTY under Resolution No. 98 -0829 shall supersede this Agreement. SECTION NO. 4: MODIFICATION No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be valid until the same is reduced to writing and executed with the same formalities as this present Agreement. SECTION NO. 5: WAIVER No officer, employee, agent or otherwise of the COUNTY has the power, right or authority to waive any of the conditions or provisions to this Agreement. No waiver of any breach of this Agreement shall be held to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach. All remedies afforded in this Agreement or at law shall be taken and construed as cumulative, that is, in addition to every other remedy provided herein or by law. Satisfaction of Conditions Agreement Page 6 of 9 Failure of the COUNTY to enforce at any time any of the provisions of this Agreement or to require at any time performance by any other Party of any provision hereof shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of such provisions, nor in any way affect the validity of this Agreement or any part hereof, or the right of the COUNTY to hereafter enforce each and every such provision. SECTION NO. 6: NOTICES All notices called for or provided for in this Agreement shall be in writing and must be served on any of the Parties either personally or by certified mail, return receipt requested, sent to the PARTIES at their respective addresses hereinabove given. Notices sent by certified mail shall be deemed served when deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid. SECTION NO. 7: HEADINGS The section headings in this Agreement have been inserted solely for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall not be deemed to, define, limit or extend the scope or intent of the Sections to which they appertain. SECTION NO. 8: VENUE STIPULATION This Agreement has and shall be construed as having been made and delivered in the State of Washington, and the laws of the State of Washington shall be applicable to its construction and enforcement. Any action at law, suit in equity or judicial proceeding for the enforcement of this Agreement, or any provision hereto, shall be instituted only in courts of competent jurisdiction within Spokane County, Washington. SECTION NO. 9: ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the PARTIES. No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the PARTIES hereto. All PARTIES have read and understand all of this Agreement, and now state that no representation, promise or agreement not expressed in this Agreement has been made to induce any Party to execute the same. SECTION NO. 10: AGREEMENT TO RUN WITH LAND This Agreement constitutes a covenant running with that land which was the subject of Spokane County Resolution No. 86 -0265 with regard to PE- 1504/ZE- I80 -78. A copy of this Agreement shall also be placed in the file of BSP -48 -96 and mailed to representatives of SPOKANE MALL. SECTION NO. 11: AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE All PARTIES to this Agreement represent and certify that they have full authority and power to enter into and carry out this Agreement. The persons signing this Agreement represent that they have authority to act for ad bind their respective principals. Satisfaction of Conditions Agreement Page 7 of 9 SECTION NO. 12: INDEMNIFICATION HANSON agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the COUNTY and all its officers and employees from any and all liability, claims, actions, loss, cost or expense of any kind or nature whatsoever claimed by SPOKANE MALL and /or any of its tenants as a result of the execution of this Agreement as well as the COUNTY'S refusal to issue any further building permits within BSP -48 -96 for any Gross Leasable Area in excess of 650,000 square feet (later increased to 715,000 square feet) until SPOKANE MALL signs the Agreement executed by the COUNTY under Resolution No. 98 -0829 or until HANSON notifies the COUNTY in writing that it and SPOKANE MALL have entered into a separate Agreement. This obligation shall include the responsibility of employing/hiring /paying attorneys as designated by the COUNTY to defend any such claim or litigation. The expense of any such litigation and /or judgment therefrom shall not be considered a cost of the Project. SECTION NO. 13: DELAY Under the terns of this Agreement, HANSON has agreed to dedicate land under his ownership and /or control needed for the "expanded right of way" as well as obtain and dedicate any land under the ownership and /or control of SPOKANE MALL needed for the "expanded right of way" HANSON agrees that if he cannot voluntarily obtain such land from SPOKANE MALL necessary for the `expanded right of way" that he will reimburse the COUNTY for any and all of its expenses necessary to condemn such "expanded right of way." This will include the cost of appraisal(s) and also the fees of a SPECIALLY DEPUTIZED Prosecuting Attorney to file and process such condemnation action. The costs of the appraisal, court costs and legal costs shall not be considered part of the Project in conjunction with determining the total cost of the Project upon completion. Additionally, to the extent that there is any delay in the construction and /or completion of the Project by the WSDOT as a result of the inability to timely obtain any "expanded right of way" from SPOKANE MALL, HANSON agrees that any penalties or delay costs due by WSDOT to any contractor or subcontractor shall be solely the responsibility of HANSON and shall also not be included in the total cost of the Project upon completion. IN WITNESS WHF r . t he Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date and year opposite their respe ASL , Vice -C fir 1 iiAA. '_..r ATTEST: ; ; 1}1 ; BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKA E COUNTY, WASHINGTON WILLIAM E. DONA Clerk of the Board BZ ANIELA ERICKSON Deputy Clerk DATE: `A � g(� $ JO . ROSKELLEY STATE OF WASHINGTON ) County of Spokane ) On this ,"Jy� "I" / day of AA< , 1998, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared PHILLIP D. HARRIS, M. KATE McCASLIN, and JOHN ROSKELLEY, to me known to be the Commissioners of the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said political subdivision, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument, and that the seal affixed is the seal of said County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the day and year first written above. ,<011_111///07 ` E/ �/ �c +a _ � 0 :0' kOT AR k ° ' lam NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane. �7 My commission expires: " 7 CY DR_ DATE: U/JOM Satisfaction of Conditions Agreement Page of 9 4 ss. HANSON INDUSTRIES, INC.: By: U � . �/{ /(,(�i1� RAYMOND A. HANSON, President STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. County of Spokane ) On this day of;"i`/ . , </, 1998, before me, the undersigned, allotary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared RAYMOND A. HANSON, President of Hanson Industries, Inc., to me known to be the individual that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said political subdivision, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument, and that the seal affixed is the seal of said County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the day and year first written above. K l' 1) 403100001 VRNVRN A205D [agree \m aI I3joi nt.j pej Satisfaction of Conditions Agreement Page 10 of,9 ....• 6-;,;(5--...61 -IO<�o S NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of 5S , .. 11 V. (f) RY 9 1 t, Washington, residing at Spokane. o m . i • pUGL\ _ My commission expires: �•i t t l s T .. S p2..��QJ ' qO` WASN1C? NO. 86 -0265 Jb OS S2 IN THE MATTER CONCERKUJG_PRE- ) LIMINARY SUBDIVISIO1 PE- 1504 -8fs, ) FINDINGS OF FACT, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER tE ), AND DECISION SPONSOR: HANSON PROPERTIES THIS MATTER, being considered by the Board of County Commission- ers of Spokane County, hereinafter referred to as the "Board ", of an appeal of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee unanimous decision dated No- vember 19, 1985, where in said Committee approved the above referenced pro- posal subject to certain conditions of approval. The Board received an appeal application on November 27, 1935, by Tom P. May for Estelle Miller, Evie Crossman, Richard Morgan and Tom Rogers. The Board held a de novo public hearing on January 27 & 28, 1985, and having fully considered all testimony presented as well as considered Attorney Tom May's letter dated January 31, 1985, and the sponsor's response thereto and having individually acquainted themselves with the vicinity and the site in question, did reach a unanimous decision on February 18, 1986, to deny the appeal and in doing so enter the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the October 24, 1985, STAFF REPORT was considered as well as the staff presentation before the Board. 2. That the November 19, 1985, Hearing Examiner Committee Findinos and Order were considered. 3. That the file of PE- 1504 -85 & 2E- 180 -78 was considered by the Board. 4. That the proposal is a mixed -use development on a 226 acres site. In- cluded are a 79 acre regional shopping center, 19 acres of other commercial use, 22 acres of business park, 53 acres of industrial park, a 300 room .hotel and a remaining 43 acres of roadways and open space. The development will be accomplished through the subdivision of the property as shown on the applicant's site development plan of 42 lots, rezoning of the property consistent �", kflA Mme, ; 1c " (7 /t4 r-&5) BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON with the adopted 1986 Spokane County Zoning Code. It is noted that rezoning at the property was not necessary, however, the sponsor desired to tie down the proposal as much as possible, thus requiring the rezone under the new zoning ordinance. The review of this project is further consistent with the site development plan review requirements established with the restricted industrial zoning of the property in 1981. The project sponsor has indicated that the full development of the site will take approximately 15 years' to accomplish. 5. That the proposal is located north of Interstate 90 on either side of the Sullivan Road interchange. The site southeast of the Spokane River occupies portions of Sections 10, 11, 12, 13 & 14, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M. Spokane County, Washington. 6. That the proposal has been properly advertised in accordance with state and local regulations. 7. That public testimony regarding the project focused most attention upon the project's potential impact to existing wildlife in the Spokane River Ecosystem adjoining the property to the north and the adverse impacts from additional traffic volumes which will be generated from the project when it is fully de- veloped. These impacts include noise, exhaust and inconvenience far area residents. Additional conerns raised were that the proposed development was an unnecessary commerical development and could pose an adverse impact upon existing businesses. 8. That the proposal is located in an area designated as Industrial on the adopted Spokane County Comprehensive Plan and is within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) where Spokane Valley sewers will be installed. The Board finds the mixed commercial and industrial uses consistent with the County Comprehensive Plan noting particularly that general guidelines and goals anticipate mixed use development. The project further is consistent with the general locational guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan in that it is 1) located on relatively flat ground; 2) near arterial, freeway and rail access; . 3) buffered from areas of general residential development; 4) the project will be served by public water and sewer systems and will be served by a detailed traffic circulation system which will be developed in phases as traffic increases in the area. 9. That the Board finds the proposal is significantly buffered from most residential uses in the Valley in that to the south of the property lies the Interstate freeway and a natural ridge line elevated above the freeway on the freeway's southern border. To the north of the site lies the Spokane River, the Kaiser Trentwood Works and further to the east the Spokane Industrial Park. Two areas which have large lot residential development abutting the property were considered by the Board. One area lies generally on the east side of the project, adjacent and easterly of Flora, the other area lies to the southwest of the project generally parallel to Indiana Avenue as it is currently located. The Board notes that no building will be allowed in the easterly S00 feet of Lot 27. This would provide a substantial buffer to the residential .development along Flora. Additionally, the Board finds the project currently has no planned connection to Flora and therefore a very limited impact on Flora Road until other properties develop and establish an easterly connection of the Indiana road improvements. The Board finds that the southwest residential area will be protected through site - buffering and restrictions to the develop- ment which the sponsor has agreed to in his presentation. 10. That the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act, Chapter 43. 21C RCW, WAC 197 -11 and the Spokane Environmental Ordinance, Title 11 of the Spokane County Code have been met and more particularly: a) By document issued January 8, 1985, by Wallis D. Hubbard, Planning Director, the Sullivan Park Center DEIS, Volumes 1 and 1 (9/80) and FEIS (2/81) are recognized as adopted by reference pursuant to WAC 197 -11 -600 (4) and Spokane Environmental Ordinance 11.20.230. b) By document signed January 8, 1985, by Wallis D. Hubbard, Planning Director, a Determination of Significance and Request for Comments and on scope of a Supplemental EIS was issued for modification to the original site plan, a preliminary plat and zone reclassifications. c) The above documents were circulated consistent with WAC 197 -11 -510 and Spokane Environmental Ordinance 11.10.130. d) The Draft Supplemental EIS was scoped, drafted, issued, cir- culated, reviewed, revised and a Final Supplemental EIS issued pursuant to WAC 197 -11 and the Spokane County Environmental Or- dinance. e) The total original EIS, the Supplemental EIS and public comment given at the public hearing were noted and evaluated during the de- cision- making process, including particularly extensive information re- garding habitat impacts and effects upon flora and fauna, both di- rectly and indirectly, the traffic issues, and economic analysis. That pursuant to RCW 43.21C.090, the Board finds that the environmental documents prepared for the project are "adequate" especially in light of the testimony at the public hearing. (La. That the Board finds that the applicant has alloted approximately 17 acres of ground adjacent the river for a riparian park to minimize development impacts to the river. The riparian park will be passive in nature, without any major structure or playground facility. Mr. Mosher indicated in accordance with Washington State Department of Game guidelines that a one eight-mile area on each side of the river was studied in developing the Shorelines Management Classifications given to the different portions of the river. Testimony was received that this area of the river is currently experiencing substantial degradation from 'littering, dumping and motorcycle use. The development of a riparian park would improve the river area by encouraging passive use and facilitating a long range Park Department Plan for a bike trail along the river. The Board further finds that the river shore!and is privately owned property rather than publicly held interest. The Appellants inicated that the proposal would have a significantly ad- verse impact upon the wildlife in the area noting in particular that the area is a bald eagle nesting area. However reports received by the Board including the Environmental Impact Statement and letters from Jerry Hickman, Game Biologist for the Washington State Department of Game, do not support this contention. While the Spokane River Ecosystem may be a feeding area of eagles, the site is not indicated by Spokane County or the State of Washington as an eagle nesting area. The Board was informed that the Board of Directors of the "Walk in the Wild Zoo" had passed a resolution supporting the proposal. It is recognized by the Board that the project will cause a reduction in small burrowing animals in the areas that are developed. 12. That the Board notes that a project proposing similar uses as are current- ly under consideration was approved in March of 1981. That action rezoned the property to Restricted Industrial under the Zoning Ordinance for Spokane County which is still in effect. Although the previous action provided for a zone reclassification, the Board finds the current proposal with its extensive landscapino provisions, road network improvements and provisions for public sewering represents a substantial improvement over the project as previously considered. 13. That the project has been designed consistent with the state and local provisions of the Shorelines Management Act contained in RCW 90.58 and the local Shorelines Management Plan for Spokane County. • 14. That the Board finds the necessary utility and public improvements necessary to support this project have been recommended by County staff and have been agreed to by the sponsor. These improvements will cause the project to serve the general public health, safety and welfare. 15. That the Board understands that certain environmental changes will occur, but this was understood when the initial concept was approved in 1981. The Board believes the benefits from this project will outweigh any adverse impacts. Further, when an EIS is prepared for a project such as this, the project may be conditioned to mitigate specific identified adverse environmental impacts. The Board finds that the conditions - of approval mitigate specific identified environmental impacts. Additionally, the Board finds pursuant to SCW 43.21C.060 that all reasonable mitigation measures are sufficient to mitigate the impacts 16. The Board received comments from the appellants that the prior rezoning action for this site, (County Planning File r2E- i30 -78) %vas improper due to alleged defects in the public notice. The Board finds that this is a legal issue to be resolved by the court. However, the Board has considered the present proposal on its own merits, affording the sponsors as well as appellants the ability to address all relevant issues, including environmental. 17. The Board received comments that the commercial development of Sullivan Park Center will have an adverse impact on other business centers within Spokane County. Economic considerations are one factor which may be, considered outside of S EPA, and as such are afforded such weight as the Board deems appropriate. The Board's policy, generally' speaking, has looked toward approvals of major commercial facilities when supported by the comprehensive plan and public health, safety and welfare concerns and then let the free enterprise system sort out the proposals. 18. That concern was expressed that the proposal would contribute significant amounts of surface water discharge into the river or aquifer thereby reducing water quality. The control of surface water disposal is carefully conditioned by the Spokane County Engineer's Department under Board adopted '208' Wastewater Program guidelines. The Board notes these regulations are em- ployed with all development over the Aquifer Sensitive AR ea and have been found effective in preventing pollution of surface and ground waters. 19. The appellants indicated that the anticipated increase of traffic would cause higher noise levels in the area and degrade the air quality. Evidence presented to the Board indicated that traffic noise generated by the project will not adversely affect residential areas as they are significantly buffered by the 1 -90 freeway and the ridge to the south and the Spokane River and other industrial developments to the north as well as the voluntary setback on Lot 27. The air quality concern was addressed in environmental documents and subsequently reviewed by the Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority. The impacts currently anticipated are believed to be less than originally contemplated with the 1981 zoning approval because of mandatory air emission controls for automobiles in the County, the increased use of unleaded gas and smaller automobile engines. 20. That after considering all agencies /departments' review and public testimony, the Board concludes that the proposal as conditioned wi!I not be detrimental to the general public health, safety and welfare. 21. That at the public hearing, Attorney Tom May, at the conclusion cf all testimony questioned whether or not the Board should have sworn in all indi- viduals providing testimony. The Board notes that in fact the local Spokane County Environmental .Ordinance in Section 11.10.170 does provide that testi- mony be under oath. However, the Board finds that, although being aware of the manner in which the hearing would be held before the Board, the appellants did not raise this issue until after the close of the public testimony. Additionally, the Board finds that in their judgment, all testimony appeared to be truthfully given. 22. That the sponsors, as indicated in prior findings herein, did initiate a zone change in conjunction with their proposal. This zone change was not required in order to develop the property as proposed. However, the sponsors desired to make the proposal consistent with the new County zoning ordinance. Although this is the case, the Board finds that the sponsor has demonstrated changed conditions warranting the new zoning. These include, but are not necessarily limited to the Spokane County new zoning ordinance in and of itself. Additionally, changed conditions include a change in the originally contemplated development pattern of the community. 23. That on February 18, 1986, the Board, at a regular meeting, did the ap- peal based upon the testimonies submitted at the public hearing and other evi- dente available to the Board and thus make the following decision: DECISION From the foregoing Findings, the Board hereby DENIES the appeal and UPHOLDS the Hearing Examiner Committee Decision of Approval, subject to the revisions presented for buffering presented at the Board hearing and those conditions of approval adopted by the Hearing Examiner Committee, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by reference. BY THE ORDER OF THE BOARD THIS 0 2.5 =< DAY OF The above action taken by a unag vote of the Board of Spokane County Commissi.ners as follows: Commissioner Keith Shepard - Commissioner John McBride - Aye Commissioner Grant Peterson - Aye ATTEST: WILLIAM•E. DONAHUE Clerk of the/Board By: De.uty Clerk , 1986 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNT VAS INGTON hairman Aye SS 0338 NO. BINDING SITE PLAN BSP -48 -96 BEFORE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR SPOKANE COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF FILING THE FINAL BINDING SITE PLAN, BSP- 48 -96, IN SECTION 1 I, TOWNSHIP 25 N., RANGE 44 D-.W.M., SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON P ARCEL= RESOLU'F ION I CZ pr,m6s BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, that the Binding Site Plan BSP- 48 -96, being that portion of Section 11, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER, according to plat rccordcd in Volume 19 Pints, Pages 25 and26, in Spokane County, Washington. That portion of the Southwest quarter of SECTION II, TOWNSHIP 25 N'ORTi-i, RANG= 44 EAST, W.M. in the Spokanc County, Washington, dcscribcd as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of Lot I, Block 1 of the Plat "Sullivan Par-1: Con ter," according to plat rccordcd in Volume 19 Plats, Pages 25 and 26; thence South 06°28'18" East along thc West lint of said Lot 1, 865.00 fcct; thcncc South 56 ° 26'27" East along said Westerly lint, 778.50 fcct to a point on the Northerly right of way of Interstate 90, said point being the beginning of a non - tangent curvc concave to the Northeast with radius 2814.79 feet and a radial bearing of South 18 West; thcncc Northwesterly, through a central angle of 10 ° 04'43 ", an arc distance of 495.14 feet to the end of curvc; :hence North 61 \Vest 424.80 feet to the beginning of a curvc concave to the East with a radius of 50.00 feet; thence Northerly, through a central angle of 87 an arc distance of 76.26 feet to the beginning of a reverse curvc concavc to the Northwest with a radius of 316.20 feet and a radial bearing of South 64 East; thcncc Northeasterly, through a contra! angle of 32 ° 12'37 ", and arc distance of 4.58.85 fcct to the cnd of curvc; thence North 06 ° 28' 18" West 376.19 feet to a point on the Southcrly right of way of Indiana Avcnuc being 37.00 feet South of thc centerline, said point being on a curvc concavc to the Northwest with a radius of 6768.56 fcct and a radial bearing of South 05 ° 52'45" East; thence Easterly along said Southerly right of way, through a ccntral angle of 00 °35'33 ", an arc distance of 70.00 feet to the Westerly lint of said Sullivan Park Center and a change in right of way from 37.00 feet to 38.00 feet South of the Centerline of said Indiana Avenue; thcncc South 06 ° 28' 18" East 1.00 feet to the point of beginning. UPON THE RECOMMENDATION of the Spokanc County Building and Planning Division, the Binding Site Plan is approved with the exception that thc public rights of way dedicated in this Binding Sitc Plan will be established formaintcnancc purposed until the County Engincc: has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a separate resolution of the Board of County Commissioners. ADDITIONALLY, until the Binding Site Plan document is Lied in the Spokanc County Auditor's Office, this Binding Site Plan has only preliminary Binding Site Plan status and is subject to expiration and null and void status if not periodically granted an extension of time consistent with the policies and procedures of the Building and Planning Division. SG 0338 PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS ATTEST: By: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE k of the Board saline Montague, Deputy Clerk DAY OF APRIL, 1996. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON illl - ri hairperson John os::cllcy, Diy ;ict 1' v_ Hasson, District 2 1, 7 .. •:, . ' '''' t'•••,` '' l• ' 1. • 1 5 1 1 14.31", " , 14 ..3 2 .. rtz 41WN : - rj - af . : • " _ „ 12 /! ------------ • • " .•. - .. . -.., ..• - - :. , . ' ••.• . 'Vrtme I -7--:f'--1.., ::;-.. ---- -:"•-_ . ,,,• s '•,, il - , ------- --_____,. - 7z7;- ri t si ___ , . - . .. ••••.. ------___,Q---3,-6---__________________ _ ------ _ ._ • •, . ..... •.• t ISO • - • • - • • , ;;;;;:,•21,,, • ■•• 3 1 I • 1 2. Preliminary Plat of Sullivan Park Center Evergreen Interchange Digitized Area Scale: 1" = 200' q/8/f 8 LLJ BEGINNING OF PLAN PINTS IRD. Sii0SCNA.EGSTE T: LEGEND uni to K KKI 1110 K(. 'Panne t K(K,K •y(40. ovp.p. LKI1. • — — — -f: -_: - - -1 — --------- ' - _____ tii Is _______ \_. I -1 i inn 7:0 MP 15. 54. 1. 312402.03 P.O.T. STA. 312400 P.O.T. OK. MP 290.16 eWen”, tro,na 17 — 1 L.. — — • t, (a•conl) LZV'TSCINGTLETT ESICEISCDIANGiz tnnrirr° 1,, 1.,Eace.TivesT .77721•35.3 P.0.1. 100200.00 P.0.7. VICINITY MAP AND TOTAL PARCEL DETAILS 10[AL LENGTH OF PLAN . 1.52 NILES YK• CND OF PLAN STA. L 392•49.33 P.0.1. NE' 291.60 I ,__. .22 (I TYILLO ________________ ;.• ( It! •5007 ) SULLIVAN Nil. NYS'ACN t W Crt 7.52, MAKI/ Kit (AO TO I (ASCU Whitt SR 90 HP 290.16 TO HP 251.60 EVERGREEN ROAD III I ERCIIANGC S.C."( COPI • D R. A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. 50 -070 Teen 326474 Te la 50 -0212 March 6, 1991 Mr. John McBride Board of County Commissioners Spokane County Courthouse W. 1116 Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 RE: Ada emen.t- of D - pment Schedules for S lllivancPark Center . 2 As you know, the R. A. Hanson Company recently sold 82.56 acres near Sullivan Road and I -90 to Price Development Company, 35 Century Park -Way, Salt Lake City, Utah 84115, for the purpose of establishing a regional shopping center serving the Spokane Valley and portions of Kootenai County. The sale was completed following extensive negotiations with Spokane County departments and submittal of supplemental plan documents, including water systems, sewer systems, access road designs, freeway ramp /signal designs for Sullivan and Indiana, preliminary interchange design for Evergreen and I -90, lighting and landscape plans for review and approval by Spokane County and numerous State Agencies. R. A. Hanson Company is completing its contractual obligations to Price Development Company for Phase I of the project and is now awaiting confirmation from the purchaser that construction will commence on the shopping center at an early and prudent date so that we can complete construction - of required roadways, utilities, and perimeter improvements. we have several other potential users for properties adjoining the shopping center site who are also interested in proceeding with development. -Although we have every confidence that Price Development Company will proceed with the shopping center, we note major changes in the lending practices of financial institutions and a weakening national economy which could effectively delay or reduce the scale of the project, even though Spokane, by comparison, currently enjoys a robust economy. This is evidenced by continued expansion of retail shopping facilities within the City of Spokane. We are hopeful that our Spokane economy will remain strong for the foreseeable future and have been encouraging Price Development Company to initiate construction of the $40 million shopping center complex. Not only would such a project insure the continued expansion of our local economy, but it would also contribute almost $600,000 in local sales tax revenues (County, Criminal Justice, and Transit) during construction, not to mention the increased real estate tax base upon completion of construction. Since negotiations and necessary plan approvals are apparently complete, it is now time for Spokane County to extend an invitation to Price Development Company to become a vital part of our community, in the same manner that invitations were extended to Hewlett— Packard and to Boeing by the Board of County Commissioners. • Our firm is already looking ahead to the Phase II portion of the project; however, many of the Conditions of Approval still remain vague and subject to interpretation. Although R. A. Hanson Company is willing to pay its "fair share" for impacts created by the development, we should not be expected to provide improvements which directly benefit someone else at our expense. Following the issuance of building permits and initiation of construction by Price Development Company, our firm intends to return and continue negotiations with the Spokane County Engineers, WSDOT, and other agencies to resolve Phase II issues. For your information, we have prepared a comparative table of conditions and requirements imposed on similar shopping center proposals in the Spokane Valley. Although there may be certain justifications to the manner in which such conditions evolved, we note that Sullivan Park Center has, in effect, borne a disproportionate share of community responsibilities and special conditions. We will need proper resolution of the outstanding issues if - our project is to remain competitive with other approved sites, including those in the City of Spokane which have contributed virtually nothing to the resolution of certain offsite impacts. -Sincerely, R. A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. a. 2/ R. A. Hanson President RAH:532:tjw Sponsor/ Number/ Year Valley Mall Assoc. ZE- 142A -77 1977 Sullivan Park Center ZE- 180 -78 1986 Cafaro Co. ZE- 69A-81 1987 Approx. 50 Ac Sullivan & Mission COMPARISON OF VALLEY SHOPPING CENTER CONDITIONS Size /Location Planning Conditions Future hearing on detailed site plan, SEPA review required Portion of 226 Ac 1. Landscape Plan /208, perimeters 1 1 -90 & Sullivan 2. Sign restrictions, lighting & signing plan 3. Special landscape median for 2 Indiana extension 4. Park dedication near river 3 5. Dedication of landscaping near interchng. 6. Phasing of development 97 Ac 1. Landscape plan /208, perimeters 1 -90 at Liberty 2. Sign restrictions, lighting & signing Lake plan 3. Special 10' landscape strip on road County Engineers' Conditions 1. Imprvs. to adjoining Sullivan /signals 2. Imprvs. north to 1 -90 3. Imprvs. to adjoining Broadway 4. Tralfiic revisions to streets adjacent to Broadway 5. Possible imprvs to Broadway east of project & Flora Rd. south to Sprague County Utilities 1. Interim sewer authorized 2. UUD agreement for sewers . Construction of Indiana from Sullivan/ 1. Interim sewer authorized signals to Pines 2. UUD agreement for . Construction of new ramps © Sullivan sewers & 1 -90 . Future construction /participation of Evergreen Interchange. connection to Indiana, connection to Mission 4. Participation in Imprvs. to Sullivan south to Sprague 5. Possible participation in imprvs. to Evergreen south to Sprague 6. Possible imprvs. to Pines interchange & Indiana 7. Possible extension of Evergreen north to Trent 8. Phasing & continued traffic studies to determine future needs 9. Extenstion of Indiana between Sullivan & Flora 10.Cooperationwith WSDOT on Evergreen interchange design 1. Floodplain controls 2 Imprvs. to Liberty Lake Rd adjacent site /signals 3. Imprvs. to Liberty Lake Rd. 300' south of site 1. Connection to Liberty Lake Sewer Diems Sponsor/ Number/ Year Cafaro Co. (cont.) Size /Location WinVest Development S. of U -City ZE- 50A -87 Expansion of 1989 University City Planning Conditions 1. Landscape plan /208, perimeters 2. Submittal of 'Master Development Plan' to Ptannirxj Director 3. Cooperation with STA 4. Sign restrictions; lighting & signing plan County Engineers' Conditions County Utilities 4. Imprvs. to future Liberty Lake Mall Blvd. to Henry Rd. 5. Participate in extension of Liberty Lake Mall Blvd. to Appleway /Greenacres I -90 interchange 6. Possible imprvs. to Henry Rd., Sprague Ave. 7. Traffic signal imprvs. 8. Participate in Harvard Rd. & Greenacres Rd. /I -90 Imprvs. 1. Signal on Felts Rd. 1. Connection to County 2. Vacation of Dartmouth Rd. sewer 3- Dedications along University Rd. 4. Imprvs. of University adjacent ownership 5. Sprague Ave. turn lanes, signals - Mr; 14>i, ‘9'.E W! 1 iL07 - 3 28. 25/7 0TZ 33.754c. i •; s B L07/ 39.754c. • `N IIRE KV 5 womtrr --- CONICAL ARETA EXCEPT 1ViT1: N AREAS tODED PRIMARY SURFACE.___ -L • • { •.:. 150 4-f5 4 -Jo I8 �-- : � 1� 4 Z9 4Z ��j 35 ,1 LOT// ...-7-.9./04c- DC L 4. or% LOTS 07.f`e ,-- g -3 ! i,, s , 1 ` w 'I 14 v ' 14 1 6 6 . 1 go -7g c ac .. t o E 4, u L 1. ` , � �O r - 1 : Qt F4 J Q ! 1 e • N 0 R A tm • U Rjaa 11(9 -1 S. • �.. �.r. .rr e - 9 F Rt- s 1 z ' 11- D _ z I - -_ — - Y CC @,4-24 -4Z JKK : - 1 e � I 1- BR- 2 -7 e c•i< ^ L — -- ar -1— _- ..., w f 6.s. Z.... g i II- left-er �, 1 t. -21 t , 7YJ • - s1Z.4 ' 1 ' f! -' v't vA�v !°S•A -fir - _ �.. -c:m ---r - �!�r tie R flow/ Rl - -- n4Ac? ?.'b1J!`l ".2:3: ? }'E =.,i :^•.':':.,;.j, EE - 4- _ - A J 3_Fer AP' ia 1 - k r s_Aa - t= =- _ - - --- HH T 3. 01- 4c. s- :r 71 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. 1. TRAFFIC DATA UPDATE Project Description ' ;CO\AWE CO U iW s 9 A F� r Prior to conducting the specific analyses, existing and projected traffic conditions were updated from the 1985 study. The Spokane Galleria is a proposed regional center to be built on 63 acres in the northwest quadrant of I -90 and Sullivan Road. Indiana Avenue would be extended from its present terminus, west of Pines Road, to Sullivan Road, forming the northern boundary of the proposed regional center. Phase I of the development consists of a mall with 650,000 s.f. GLA and a 300 -room hotel. Subsequent phased development will expand the total site to approximately 82 acres. Existing Traffic New peak -hour turning movement counts were conducted on a weekday during March 1990 at seven existing intersections in the vicinity of the site. The locations counted were: Sullivan Road /I -90 Westbound Ramps Sullivan Road /I -90 Eastbound Ramps Pines Road /I -90 Westbound Ramps Pines Road /I -90 Eastbound Ramps Pines Road /Indiana Avenue Indiana Avenue /I -90 Westbound Slip Ramp. The PM peak -hour volumes are shown on Figure 1 -1. Background Conditions P1 Based on information provided by Spokane County planning staff, there are no approved l • developments in the vicinity of the project site that would add traffic to the study intersections. An average annual growth factor of four percent non - compounded (or .33 percent per month) has been established by county staff using previous traffic and census data. Applying this factor to the existing volumes and assuming a scheduled completion date in August 1992, background traffic volumes without project traffic were calculated and used in the analysis of future condition. Projections for non - project through trips on Indiana Avenue were not found and are not included. 1 -1 INDIANA AV LO WI CO 90 .111. r 72 72 4— 125 00 v C 19 0 p I N C E .c v a 238 �' T 0 774 Z e C p W Figure 1.1 1990 PM PEAK —HOUR VOLUMES 1 1 1 1 1 Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. Future Roadway Improvements As of this writing, there were no funded or programmed roadway improvements scheduled for the next two years. However, with construction of this development, specific improvements will be implemented and were used in the intersection analyses. These improvements are discussed below. Existing Indiana Avenue, east of Pines Road, will be extended to Sullivan Road and widened to four lanes. A raised median will be constructed in the center of Indiana Avenue in front of the site. Left -turn pockets will be provided at driveway ingress and egress locations. The required lengths for these lane pockets are presented in subsequent paragraphs. A new, four - legged, signalized intersection will be constructed at Sullivan Road and Indiana Avenue, approximately 300 feet north of the I -90 westbound ramps. The east approach of this intersection will be a direct off -ramp from westbound I -90 for westbound traffic on Indiana Avenue. Sullivan Road will be widened to six lanes between the Spokane River bridge and the I -90 eastbound ramps. Improvements will be made to the existing intersection of Sullivan Road and the I -90 westbound ramps. The intersection lane configurations used for analysis of future conditions with the project are shown on Figure 1 -2. Project - Generated Traffic The amount of traffic generated by Phase I of the proposed shopping center was estimated by applying appropriate trip generation equations based on the amount of gross leasable area (GLA). The directions of approach and departure, or trip distribution pattern, was estimated based on the relative existing and future locations of complementary land uses -- primarily residential- -and locations of population centers. The trips generated by the shopping center were assigned to the roadway system based on the directions of approach and departure. The three steps of trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment are described in the following paragraphs. The number of trips generated by Phase I of the shopping center /hotel development was estimated by applying trip generation equations from the 1987 Institute of Transportation Engineers 1 publication, Trip Generation, 4th Edition. Phase I will generate an estimated 26,545 daily trips. In the PM peak hour, the following trips are projected: In Out Total Shopping Center 968 1,092 2,060 Hotel 104 88 192 Total 1,072 1,180 2,252 1 -3 1 1 INDIANA AV Figure 1-2 1992 INTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATIONS 1 1 1 1 1 1 Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. Total trips are slightly less than 2,326 peak -hour trips projected in the 1985 study due to updated material in the newer edition of the referenced Trip Generation manual. Trip Distribution Trip distribution generally followed the distribution developed in the 1985 study. For commercial trips from the west, however, it was assumed many would use Pines Avenue as congestion increases on Sullivan Road at Indiana Avenue. Also, it was assumed the majority of the hotel trips were oriented to I -90. The following table shows the trip distribution assumptions: Approach Commercial Hotel I -90 from west 27% 40% I -90 from east 17% 40% Sullivan from north 16% 5 % Sullivan from south 30% 5% Pines from north 5% 5 % Pines from south 5% 5% 100% 100% Trip Assignment Based on trip generation projections and distribution assumptions, trips were assigned to the roadway network. Figure 1 -3 illustrates the assignment of Phase I site - generated trips. Intersection Operations To evaluate the impact of the proposed development on the surrounding roadway system, the projected operating conditions of the study intersections were evaluated with a level of service analysis. Level of service is a qualitative measure of an intersection's operating level, ranging from Level A, free -flow conditions, to Level F, stop- and -go conditions. Descriptions of the different levels of service are presented in Table 1 -1. 1 -5 1 3 1 INDIANA AV 130 1 X59 C 68 4- 127 238 3 Figure 1 -3 PHASE 1 PROJECT TRIPS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. TABLE 1 -1 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS Level of Service Interpretation A,B Uncongested operations; all queues clear in a single signal cycle. Volume -to- Capacity (V /C) Ratio Less than 0.7 0.70 - 0.79 0.80 - 0.89 C Light congestion; occasional backups on critical approaches. D Significant congestion on critical approaches, but intersection functional. Cars required to wait through more than one cycle during short peaks. No long- standing queues formed. E Severe congestion with some long- standing queues on critical approaches. Blockage of intersection may occur if traffic signal does not provide for protected turning movements. Traffic queue may block nearby intersection(s) upstream of critical approach(es). F Total breakdown, stop- and -go operation. 1.0 and Greater .90 - .99 Transportation Research Board (TRB) Circular 212 planning method was used to evaluate the existing operating conditions of the signalized intersections. This method compares the sum of the critical movements, the turning movements that dictate the operation of the intersection. to the intersection's capacity. For unsignalized intersections, the procedures presented in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual were used to calculate levels of service. Future volumes used in the analyses consist of existing PM peak -hour volumes, traffic added due to annual regional growth, and traffic generated by Phase I of the project. Based on the lane configurations shown on Figure 1 -2, the future volumes will result in the Levels of service shown in Table 1 -2. In addition to those intersections presently signalized, it was assumed the Sullivan Road /Indiana Avenue intersection will be signalized. Again, non - project through trips that might be attracted to Indiana Avenue are not included. 1 -7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. TABLE 1 -2 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (1992) PHASE I DEVELOPMENT Intersection Sullivan Road /Indiana Avenue 0.71 C Sullivan Road /I -90 WB off-ramp 0.57 A Sullivan Road /I -90 EB off-ramp 0.79 C Pines Avenue /Indiana Avenue 0.51 A Pines Avenue /I -90 WB off -ramp 0.75 C Pines Avenue /I -90 EB off-ramp 0.80 D Indiana Avenue /WB slip ramp* A /B* Indiana Avenue /East Mall driveway* E /F* Indiana Avenue /Center Mall driveway* A /C* Indiana Avenue /West Mall driveway* -- A /A* * Unsignalized Intersection (Major Street /Minor Street). 1 -8 V/C Ratio Level of Service j Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. 2. INDIANA AVENUE EXTENSION The extension of Indiana Avenue from Pines Road to Evergreen Road, the western end of the site, as a four -lane road instead of a two -lane road may attract some trips from the west and the south as an alternative to Sullivan Road. A prime consideration of additional traffic on Indiana Avenue is the operation of the Pines Road /Indiana Avenue intersection. However, even assuming 13 of the 27 percent trips approaching from the west utilized Pines Road instead of Sullivan Road, the Pines Road /Indiana Avenue intersection would operate at LOS A. Of the trips exiting the site, 22 percent of the westerly oriented trips would still be assumed to use the convenient slip ramp to westbound I -90. Even under Phases II and III, assuming the same d distribution and background traffic, the Pines Road /Indiana Avenue intersection would operate at LOS A with the present geometrics. 2 -1 r� OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer DATE: TO: ATTENTION: CITY /STATE: FAX NUMBER: N. 8 11 Jefferson FACSIMILE COVER SHEET /0vti / n 3('ttUe NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): 2 MESSAGE/SPECIAL INSTRUCTION: t C 0 U N T Y A DIVISION OF TtiE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott,.P.E., Director Do *15t-22 1 Y FROM: e r ry S i /� 5 COUNTY FAX NO.: / (509) 456 -4715 r s '' Please contact J e-r ry at (509) 456 -3600, should any problems occur with transmission or receipt of facsimile. Spokane, WA 992o0 -0180 (509) 456 -3600 FAX (504) 456 -4715 IJ ic For security purposes only, R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation, hereby assigns to SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, the following: U.S. Government Obligations, Saloman Government Backed Repurchase Agreement, or other investments as approved by the parties hereto, in the face amount of $1,906,470.00 and held in and by Seattle First National Bank, and Easter, n. ,p_ Q p ' i( 4 en v�l � J ld v/ c This Assignment is made as security for the full and faithful performance by R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. of the construction of certain roads, drainage swales, landscaping, sprinkler system and street lighting, as specified in the typical section and roadway improvement specifications for said subdivision, dated April 17, 1990 and on file in the Office of the County Engineer, and the landscape plans for said subdivision dated April 12, 1990, and on file in the Office of the County Planning Department. Any interest benefits accruing under said investment funds shall remain the property of R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. Said investment funds are to be released to R.A. Hanson Company, inc. or any other party only with the prior written consent and agreement of Spokane County. PROVIDED, the undersigned does hereby authorize Seattle First National Bank to pay over to Spokane County all or a sufficient portion of the moneys in the investment funds referenced hereinabove upon written documentation being received from Spokane County indicating that the purposes for which the investment funds were assigned have not been fully and faithfully performed as required and a statement of that amount of money which the County deems necessary to complete such obligation. Upon receipt of such written documentation, R.A. Hanson Company hereby authorizes Seattle First National Bank to release to Spokane County that amount of money requested up to the maximum amount in,the investment funds account. PROVIDED, FURTHER, that R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. shall have the right to direct the investment of the funds which are subject to this Assignment, and, therefore, this Assignment shall be effective as to any such investment account Dated this l t " day of May, 1990. SEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL BANK BY C AAA- Dated this Q 4( day of May, 1990. APPROVED AS TO FORM: SPOKANE COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE By ASSIGNMENT R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. By 6f3. � � I * i2Z4' At / l.. R.A. Hanson - President The undersigned beneficiary is a party to that certain Developer Agreement dated April 6, 1990, in which R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. obligated itself to Spokane County in the amount of $1,906,470.00 for the construction of certain improvements set forth in said Developer Agreement. The Developer Agreement was then secured by that certain Deed of Trust dated April 6, 1990, in which R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. is grantor and First American Title Insurance Company is trustee, filed for record on May 4, 1990, as Auditor's File No. 9005040326, and recorded in Volume 1109 of Mortgages, at page 66, records of Spokane County, Washington. There was no promissory note executed by R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., and therefore no promissory note is being surrendered herewith. The obligations and indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust now having been fully secured by other security, the Deed of Trust is herewith surrendered to you for cancellation and reconveyance. You are therefore requested, upon payment of all sums owing to you, to reconvey without warranty, to the person(s) entitled thereto, the right, title and interest now held by you thereunder. Dated this Z day of May, 1990. ATTEST: illiam E. Donahue lerk of lip Board �� is ��I/ i.► ,- - 'eputy 6 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Spokane County Prosecutor's Office By � � r cha 1 C. Dempsey p s ey - SPOKANE COUNTY Approved pursuant to Resolution 90 -0479 REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEYANCE Patricia A. Mummey - Chairman Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington [11SEAFIRST SAW FORM 5091 12/88 ADMINISTRATOR: LORI MONTOYA HANSON /PRICE IMPROVEMENT FUND ESCROW ACCOUNT • ACCOUNT NO 724 - 336175 i p ^r I vo r L: JUN 8 1990 PROSECUTING ATTORNEY SPOKANE COUNTY RECEIVED JUN 1 1 1990 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER MIKE DEMPSEY - DEPUTY SPOKANE COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE W. 1100 MALLON - PUBLIC SAFETY BLG SPOKANE, WA 99260 [11 SEAFIRSTBANM FORM 5091 12/88 HANSON /PRICE IMPROVEMENT FUND ESCROW ACCOUNT CASH STATEMENT COVERING APRIL 30, 1990 TO MAY 31, 1990 SUMMARY OF INCOME CASH ACCOUNT YOUR LAST STATEMENT SHOWED INCOME CASH ON HAND OF INCOME CASH RECEIVED SINCE THEN WAS AND DISBURSEMENTS WERE MADE IN THE AMOUNT OF LEAVING INCOME CASH ON HAND OF SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL CASH ACCOUNT YOUR LAST STATEMENT SHOWED PRINCIPAL CASH ON HAND OF PRINCIPAL CASH RECEIVED SINCE THEN WAS AND DISBURSEMENTS WERE MADE IN THE AMOUNT OF LEAVING PRINCIPAL CASH ON HAND OF ACCOUNT NO. /Z4 33b1 /5 $ 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 2,747,392.00 - 2,747,391.34 $ 0.66 30 0473 8005040326 � e •t U ,. r •n ea 0ro9 Ti (1 r Tic it (C1 4-2 6;,,r yne-2 r DEED OF TRUST 424 o� / je s 91 -9a p This Deed - of Trust made this 6th day of April,.1990, by and between GRANTOR, whose name and address• is R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., P.O. Box 7400, Spokane, Washington 99207, a corporation; TRUSTEE, whose name and address is First American Title Insurance Company, W. 704 First Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99204.; and SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of_ Washington, BENEFICIARY, whose address is West 1116•Broadway, Spokane, Washington, to -wit: Grantor hereby bargains, sells and conveys to Trustee, in trust, with power of sale the following described real property in Spokane County, Washington: SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT " A " AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE. The property which is the subject of this Deed of Trust is not used principally for agricultural or farming purposes. This deed is for the purpose of securing the obligation of the Grantor herein not to sell, convey or apply for building permits on any lot assigned herein until the Grantor constructs all roads, with landscaped medians, drainage structures and facilities, sidewalks, monuments, curbs, street lights, sprinkler system, and other facilities in accordance with the approved plans. on file in the Spokane County Engineer's office. These plans are designed to meet Spokane County Standards adopted in Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, and Conditions of Approval in the Findings and Order for PE- 1504 -85 and zone change ZE- 180 -78. The Grantor agrees to complete all above - mentioned improvements by May. 1, 1992. In the event these improvements are not completed by the above - mentioned date, the Grantor is considered to have defaulted on the Deed of Trust and Spokane County may at any time .thereafter proceed as outlined hereafter. The Spokane County Engineer's estimate $1,906,470.00. It is further, understood that this Deed of Trust is for the actual cost of improvements at the time they are made, which cost may exceed the Spokane County Engineer's estimate. Li 51 32 , 9'D`-}D 45113. 9D2. MS W . g D3,1 45t' con° • YOL. il69PAUE / 6 6 for these improvements is To protett the security of this Deed of Trust, Grantor covenants and agrees: (1) To keep the property in good condition and repair; to permit no waste thereof; and to comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, covenants, conditions and restrictions affecting the property. (2) To pay before delinquent all lawful taxes and assessments against the property; to keep the property free and clear of all other charges, liens or encumbrances impairing the security of this Deed of Trust. (3) To defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security hereof or the rights or powers of Beneficiary or Trustee, and to pay all costs and expenses, including costs of title - search and attorney's fees in a reasonable amount, in any such action or proceeding and in any suit brought by Beneficiary to foreclose this Deed of Trust. (4) „ To pay all costs, fees and expenses in connection with this Deed of 'Trust, including the expenses of Trustee, incurred in forcing the obligations secured hereby and the Trustee's and attorney's fees actually incurred as provided by statute. (5) Should the Grantor fail to pay when due any taxes, assessments, liens, encumbrances or other charges against the property hereinabove described, Beneficiary may pay the same, and the amounts so paid, with interest at a rate of 12 percent, shall be added to become a part of the debts secured by this Deed of Trust. It is mutually agreed that: A. RECONVEYANCES: (1) Conditions for Reconveyance. Grantor shall have the right to have any lot or lots within the subdivision reconveyed. The conditions precedent to said reconveyance are: _ (a) No notice of default remains uncured; (b) Grantor shall be entitled to said reconveyance on all or a portion of the lots within the subdivision upon: i. Construction by the Grantor of all roads within the fins'. Beneficiary in accordance with such final plat and acceptance of said construction by the Beneficiary; or ii. Construction by the Grantor of a portion of the roads within the final plat to the standards required of the Grantor by the Beneficiary in accordance with such final —2— VOL . 1 u 9 PAGE 6 7 plat to the standards required of the Grantor by the flow within the approved plat; or -3- VOL 09PAGE 68 plat and acceptance of said construction by the Benefi- ciary; provided, however, the Beneficiary retains the .exclusive authority to determine whether or not to accept any portion of the roads based in part upon the traffic iii. Submittal by the Grantor and acceptance by the Beneficiary of acceptable guarantees to construct all or a portion of the roads within the final plat to the standards submitted to the Grantor by the Beneficiary in accordance with such final plat. Such guarantees may include performance bonds, loan assignments or assignments of savings accounts; provided, however, a submittal to the Beneficiary of guarantees for less than all the roads in the plat /must be accompanied by a written development proposal indicating those lots within the approved plat which will be sold as a result of a partial reconveyance. The development proposal must be approved in writing' by the Beneficiary prior to the acceptance of the guarantee and partial reconveyance. (2) Grantor shall pay for ALL costs and fees in preparation of full or partial reconveyances. (a) Subordination to Third Party Vendees. Beneficiary agrees that in the ,event of foreclosure of Grantor's interest herein, Beneficiary shall reconvey to Vendees of the Grantor upon performance by said Vendees to Beneficiary as hereinbefore stated. (3) Cooperation. Each of the parties hereto, forthwith, and on the request of the other, shall execute and deliver such documents and take such action as may be reasonably required in order to carry out the intent and purposes of this Deed of Trust. (4) Default. Upon default by the Grantor(s) in the performance of any agreement contained herein, all sums secured hereby shall immediately become due and payable at the option of Beneficiary. In such event and upon written request of the Beneficiary, the Trustee shall sell the trust property in accordance with the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washington, and public auction to the highest bidder. Any person except Trustee may bid at the Trustee's sale. The Trustee shall apply the proceeds of the same as follows: (a) To the expense of sale, including reasonable Trustee's and attorney's fees; thereto. (5) (b) To the obligations 'secured by this Deed of Trust; (c) The surplus, if any, shall be distributed to the persons entitled Trustee shall deliver to the Purchaser at the sale, its deed without warranty, which shall convey to the Purchaser the interest in the property which Grantor had, or had the power to convey, at the time of his execution of this Deed of Trust, and such as he may have acquired thereafter. The Trustee's deed shall recite the facts shown that sale- was conducted in compliance with all the requirements of law and of this Deed of Trust, which recital shall be prima facie evidence of such compliance and conclusive evidence thereof in favor of bona fide purchasers and encumbrances for value. (6) The power of sale conferred by this Deed of Trust and by the Deed of Trust Act in the State of Washington, is not an exclusive remedy; Beneficiary may cause this Deed of Trust to be foreclosed as a mortgage. (7) In the event of the death, incapacity or disability or resignation pf Trustee, Beneficiary may appoint in writing a Successor Trustee, and upon the recording of such appointment in the mortgage records of the county in which this Deed of Trust is recorded, the Successor Trustee shall be vested with all powers of the .original Trustee. The Trustee is not obligated to notify any party hereto of pending sale under any Deed of Trust or of any action or proceeding in which the Grantor, Trustee or Beneficiary shall be a party, unless such action or proceeding is brought by Trustee. (8) This Deed of Trust applies, inures to the benefit of, and is binding not only on the parties hereto, but their heirs, devisees, legatees, administrators, executives, successors and assigns. GRANTOR R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. ATTEST* ILLIAM E CLERK OF u t y ONAHUE BOARD -4- VOL. ii09pAGE 69 By: • a / Y „it R.A. Hanson - President SPOKANE COUNTY C airman, Boar. of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington APPROVED AS TO FORM: SPOKANE COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE By: / f^e C. VOL 1109PAGE 70 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) County of Spokane ) On this day personally appeared before me. g7 /(4'4 A. /ksemMey known tome to be the individual(s) described in and .ho executed the within and fore •• •g instrument and acknowledged that he they signed the same as his t their free and voluntary act and deed fo a uses and purposes therein sta ed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND and affixed_my official s 1 this .211/ P day of (i/ 0347o -5- By: TRUSTEE: Received this day of , 19 Notary Public in a for the State' of Washington, residing at Spo ane My commission expires: Title: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of Spokane ) On this l "day of April, 1990, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared R.A. Hanson, to me known to be the President of R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said in- strument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and.purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the ay and y -ar first above written. NOTAf7FW'ROBLIC My Appointment Expires: S- /7 -7,? RECEIVED • FILED OR R- CORDED RECUESTOF MA'I Al 3 43 PM r'91 SPCC /Ji That'portion of Sections 11, 13 and 14, T. 25 N, R. 44 E.N.N. described as follows: • -- Begin at the NW corner of said Section 13: thence 9 02'46'23 "E, along the West line of said Section 13, 60.72 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence 9 69'57'29"E 81.37 feet to the Beginning of a nontangent curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 40.00 feet and a radial bearing of 9 87'13'37 ■W; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 71'06'35" , an arc distance of 49.64 feet: thence S 73'52'58"E 384.82 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 1442.00 feet; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 12'16'45", an arc distance of 309.04 feet; thence 3 28 21'47 "W radial to said curve 92.00 feet; thence S 37'11'15 "W 126.03 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 633.00 feet and a radial bearing of N38'25'17 "E, said point being on the Northerly R/W of the E -NS ramp for Interstate 90 (I -90) t Sullivan Road; thence Westerly through a central angle of 41'10'58" an arc distance of 454.98 feet; thence S 87'14'19 "W, along said Northerly R/W 200.29 feet to the line between said Sections 13 L 14; thence Continuing S 87'14'19 "W along the Northerly R/W of the NS -W ramp for I -90 at Sullivan Road, 1048.61 feet to the Northerly R/W of said I -90; thence N. 77'54'39 "W, along said Northerly line, 216.86 feet; thence N 76 0 11, along said Northerly line, 1550.20 feet; thence N 74'10'41 "W,, along said - Northerly llne,,,.620,00 feeG; .thence N 56'26'27 "W 778.50 feet; thence 11 06724'18"N 950.00 feet to a point a on curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6684.56 feet and a radial bearing of S 06'28'18 "E, said point being on the Southerly R/W of the Union Pacific Railroad; thence Easterly, along said R/W, through a central angle of 11'17'05• an arc distance of 1316.56 feet; thence N 72'14'37 "E, along said R/W 551.72 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 964.95 feet and a radial bearing of 3 53'51'00 "W, said point being on the Southwesterly line of the State Parks Department Property as shown on .. Racord.of Survey filed in Survey book 41 page 84; the next 6 courses are along said Southwesterly line, thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 9'28'38" , an arc distance of . 159.61 feat; thence 3 45'37'38 "E 912.03 feat to the beginning of a curve concave to the Northeast with a radiva.of 2874.80 feet; thence Southeasterly througn a central angle of 11'48'30• an arc distance of 592.48 feet; thence 9 57'26•08•E 588.09 feet:thence 3 32'33'52 10.00 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave to the Northeast with radius of 5749.58 feet and a radial bearing of 9 32'33'52 "W; thence Southeasterly through a Central angle of 5'59'36•,an arc distance of 601.43 feet to the Westerly 1/W of Sullivan Road; thence S 03'24'03 along said Westerly R/W, 164.40 feet] thence S 02'46'23 "E, along said Westerly R/W, 37.28 feet; thence S 69 57'29 "E 59.67 feet to the True P.O.B. EXCEPT State Right of Way. $itnats'in.ths County of Spokans,.Stato of Washington. EXHIBIT "A" VOI. 11 O 9 PAGE 71 90 0479 NO. BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR SPOKANE COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF FILING THE FINAL PLAT OF ) SULLIVAN PARK CENTER, FILE NO. PE- 1504 -85 ) AND ZONE CHANGE FROM RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (RI) TO COMMUNITY BUSINESS ) RESOLUTION (B -2) AND REGIONALBUSINESS (B -3), FILE NO. ) ZE- 180-78 IN SECTIONS 11, 13 & 14, TOWNSHIP ) 25 NORTH, RANGE 44 EWM, SPOKANE COUNTY ) WASHINGTON ) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, that the Final Plat of Sullivan Park Center that portion of Sections 11, 13 and 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington, described as follows, with a more precise description located in the plat dedication: That portion of SECTIONS 11, 13 AND 14, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST, W.M., in Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Begin at the Northwest corner of said Section 13; thence South 02 ° 46'23" East, along the West line of said Section 13, 60.72 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 69 °57'29" East 81.37 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 40.00 feet and a radial bearing of South 87 ° 13'37" West; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 71 ° 06'35 ", an arc distance of 49.64 feet; thence South 73 °52'58" East 384.82 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 1442.00 feet; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 12 ° 16'45 ", an arc distance of 309.04 feet; thence South 28 ° 23'47" West radial to said curve 92.00 feet; thence South 37 ° 11'15" West 126.03 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 633.00 feet and a radial bearing of North 38 ° 25'17" East, said point being on the Northerly R/W of the E -NS ramp for Interstate 90 (I -90) at Sullivan Road; thence Westerly through a central angle of 41 ° 10'58" an arc distance of 454.98 feet; thence South 87 ° 14'19" West, along said Northerly R/W 200.29 feet to the line between said Sections 13 and 14; thence continuing South 87 ° 14'19" West along the Northerly R/W of the NS -W ramp for I -90 at Sullivan Road, 1048.61 feet to the Northerly R/W of said I -90; thence North 77 ° 54'39" West, along said Northerly line, 216.86 feet; thence North 76 ° 55'02" West, along said Northerly line, 1550.20 feet; thence North 76 °10'41" West, along said Northerly line, 620.00 feet; thence North 56 ° 26'27" West 778.50 feet; thence North 06 ° 28'18" West 950.00 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6684.56 feet and a radial bearing of South 06 °28'18" East, said point being on the Southerly R/W of the Union Pacific Railroad; thence Easterly, along said R /W, through a central angle of 11 ° 17'05" an arc distance of 1316.56 feet; thence North 72 °14'37" East, along said R/W 551.72 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 964.95 feet and a radial bearing of South 53 °51'00" West, said point being on the Southwesterly line of the State Parks Department Property as shown on Record of Survey filed in Survey Book 41 Page 84; the next 6 courses are along said Southwesterly line; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 9 ° 28'38 ", an arc distance of 159.61 feet; thence South 45 ° 37'38" East 912.03 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 2874.80 feet; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 11 ° 48'30 ", an arc distance of 592.48 feet; thence South 57 ° 26'08" East 588.09 feet; thence South 32 ° 33'52" West 10.00 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave to the Northeast with radius of 5749.58 feet and a radial bearing of South 32 ° 33'52" West; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 5 ° 59'36 ", an are distance of 601.43 feet to the Westerly R/W of Sullivan Road; thence South 03 ° 24'03" East, along said Westerly R /W, 164.40 feet; thence South 02 °46'23" East, along said Westerly R /W, 37.28 feet; thence South 69 ° 57'29" East 59.67 feet to the True Point of Beginning. EXCEPT State Right of Way. NO. 90 0479 FINAL PLAT RESOLUTION UPON THE RECOMMENDATION of the Spokane County Planning Department, the final plat is approved with the exception that the public rights of way dedicated in this plat will not be established for maintenance purposes until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a separate resolution of the Board of County Commissioners. ADDITIONALLY, until the final plat document is filed in the Spokane County Auditor's Office, this subdivision has only preliminary plat status and is subject to expiration and null and void status if not periodically granted an extension of time consistent with the policies and procedures of the Planning Department. PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS 2- ,/ DAY OF O �Zll t 1990 By: MO Rosanne Montague, Deputy Cle REV 1/90 mo ST: 2IAM E. DO rk of the Board , BO FILE NO. PE- 1504 -85 PAGE NO. 2 Patricia A. , Chairman OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON rye AP A Steven` asson DEVELOPER AGREEMENT RECav APR 11 1990 cimor E This Agreement is made and entered into this 6th day of April, 1990, by and between R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer" and SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at W. 1116 Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as the "County ", jointly referred to as the "Parties ", W I T N E S S E T H : WHEREAS, Developer received preliminary plat approval from the County for Sullivan Park Center, PE- 1504 -85, ZE- 180 -78, on March 25, 1986, and WHEREAS, Developer wishes to obtain approval of Final Plat from the County, and WHEREAS, the County has required, as a Condition of Approval of Final Plat, that Developer construct certain improvements in the form of roads, drainage swales, landscaping, sprinkler system, and lighting, all pursuant to that certain Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Planning Report dated October 25, 1985, and WHEREAS, it is required that Developer post a bond or provide other security for the construction of said improvements before the Final Plat will be approved, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the covenants made hereinafter and the mutual benefits to be derived by the Parties hereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. Upon execution of this Agreement, Developer shall grant a deed of trust to County of all the property contained within the proposed Final Plat. The grant of said deed of trust to County shall be made for the purposes of pledging said real estate to County as security for the full performance by Developer of the construction of those improvements required in the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Planning Report Conditions of Approval dated October 24, 1985. It is acknowledged and understood between the parties hereto that —1— Developer intends to sell approximately 82 acres of the property contained within the Final Plat to Price Development Company, a Utah corporation, within fifteen (15) days of the filing of the Final Plat. Developer is to receive a cash sum of money from Price Development Company as and for the purchase of said property. It is agreed between Developer and County that at such time that Developer receives cash proceeds from the sale to Price Development Company, then Developer may, at Developer's option, deposit $1,967,802.50 into a savings certificate and /or bank savings account as security for the cost of the construction of roads, drainage swales, landscaping, lighting and sprinkler system as required in the aforementioned Conditions of Approval. In the alternative, Developer may obtain a bond or letter of credit, either of which must be first approved by County, in such amounts as to adequately collateralize Developer's obligations for the aforementioned improvements. At such time as $1,967,803.00 is deposited as set forth above, or when Developer has obtained a bond or letter of credit acceptable to County, then County will reconvey and release its deed of trust in lieu thereof. 2. In the event that Developer chooses to use the cash sale proceeds as security, then Developer agrees to execute assignment agreements in a form acceptable to the County for the purpose of substituting the cash collateral for the aforementioned deed of trust. Similarly, any bond or letter of credit pledged by Developer, as security for the required improvements, must first be approved by County before County will be required to release its deed of trust. 3. County agrees that Developer shall be entitled to all interest earned on the escrowed funds, which interest shall be paid to Developer at Developer's discretion. County agrees that as the improvements are constructed, County may reduce the amount of the security held by County at the discretion of County. Any discretionary reductions in the amount of security shall be based upon the County Engineer's estimate of costs to complete the improvements required of Developer. 4. The initial amount of $1,967,803.00, which is to secure the performance of Developer, includes $267,803.00, which is the amount that the Spokane County Planning Department has required as security for the construction of landscaping and irrigation in the landscaped median in Indiana Avenue and the two parcels of land- which will be deeded to the State of Washington for the Sullivan Road Interchange. The $267,803.00 has been computed by figuring the total square footage of the median in Indiana Avenue —2— (71,250 sq. ft.) and the square footage in the property to be deeded to the State of Washington (81,780 sq. ft) at $1.75 per square foot. These computations do not make any allowance for turn -out lanes on Indiana Avenue. It is therefore agreed that the total security amount of $1,967,803.00 will be adjusted at such time that the final turn -out lane requirements are determined. It is also agreed and understood that although County will require a bond or other security for all of the landscaping, County will permit Developer to construct only that portion of the landscaped median in Indiana Avenue which lies adjacent to that portion of the Final Plat for Sullivan Park Center which is being sold by Developer to Price Development Company. At such time that improvements are constructed on other portions of the property covered in the Plat, then the landscaping shall be completed in that portion of Indiana Avenue abutting these properties before occupancy permits for these properties will issued. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above - written. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE, Clerk of the Board By Deputy Clerk -3- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY By By By Patricia Mummey - Chairman Steven Hasson John McBride DEVELOPER: R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. By R.A. Hanson - President • s'(ANE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPART DEPKRTC T Spokane County, Washington RIGHT 6F WAY DEED IN THE MATTER OF Indiana Avenue , No. 280 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that R. A. Hanson and Company, Inc., and also The Whitworth Foundation, a Non - Profit Washington Corporation of the County of Spokane, in the State of Washington, for and in consideration of Mutual: Benefits, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents do grant, bargain, sell and convey unto said Spokane County the following described parcel of land situated in Spokane County in the State of Washington to wit: A'strip of land over a portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 11 and . the Southeast quarter of Section 10, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., in Spokane County, Washington, the center line of which is described as follows: Begin at the Northeast corner of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M.; thence South 02 ° 46'23" East along the East line of said Section, 140.61 feet to the centerline of proposed Indiana Avenue; thence North 81 °15'36" West 692.40 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 955.00 feet; thence Northwesterly through a central angle of 57 ° 15'36" an are distance of 954.40 feet; thence North 24 ° 00'00" West 220.00 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 955.00 feet; thence Northwesterly through a central angle of 29 ° 07'01 ", an arc distance of 485.32; thence North 53 °07'01" West 334.35 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 1500.00 feet; thence Northwesterly through a central angle of 50 ° 13'37 ", an arc distance of 1314.94 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6731.56 feet; thence Westerly through a central angle of 06 ° 52'20 ", an arc distance of 807.40 feet to the True Point of Beginning at which the right of way'. North of the centerline is 47.00 feet and South of the centerline is 37.00 feet, said point being the Westerly line of the proposed plat of Sullivan Park Center; thence continuing Westerly, along said curve, through a central angle of 2 ° 39'55 ", an arc distance of 313.14 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the Southeast with a radius of 1500.00 feet, at said point the right of way North of the centerline changes from 47.00 feet to 37.00 feet; thence Southwesterly through a central angle of 20 ° 09'40 ", an arc distance of 527.82 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 1500.00 feet; thence Southwesterly through a central angle of 21 ° 20'29 ", an are distance of 558.72 feet to a point 47.00 feet North of the South line of the North half of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10, at said point the right of way South of the centerline changes from 37.00 feet to 47.00 feet; thence South 87 ° 22'26" West, parallel with said South line 2188.94 feet to the East line of Shannon Avenue (No. 280) and the end of said described centerline. The side line of said described right of way to be extended or shortened to meet said East line. 10 & Located in Section 11 Township 25 North- Range 44 East, W.M. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same. unto the said Spokane County for the.purposes of a public road forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hand(s) and seal(s) this /day of 19 R.A: HANSON AND COMPANY, INC. V Raymond A. Hanson, President Lois J. Hanson, Secretary This Deed of Trust made this of Washington, Beneficiary, Washington, to -wit:. Grantor hereby bargains, file in the Spokane County DEED OF TRUST 6* day of April by and between GRANTOR, whose name and address is R.A. Hanson Company. Inc P.O. Box 7400, Spokane, WA 99207 ; a corporation, TRUSTEE, whose name and First American Title Insurance Company address is W. 704 First Avenue, Spokane, WA 99204 and SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State whose address is West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, Sells and conveys to Trustee, in trust, with of sale the following described real property in Spokane County, Washington: SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE The property which is the subject of this Deed of Trust is not used principally for agricultural or farming purposes. This deed is for the purpose of securing the obligation of the Grantor herein under that certain Developer Agreement of even date, under the terms of which Grantor has agreed to construct all roads, drainage � tsuct � nd D✓ walk 0 s ' monuments, curbs and other facilities in accordance with the approve plans on Engineer's office. These plans are designed to meet Spokane County Standards adopted in Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, and Conditions of Approval in the Findings and Order for PE - 1504 - zone change ZE - 180 - further understood that this Deed of Trust is for the estimate. , 1990 , power and The Grantor agrees to complete and above - mentioned improvements by event ,these improvements are not completed by the above - mentioned date, the In the on the Deed of Trust and Spokane County outlined hereafter. The Spokane . It is Grantor is considered to have defaulted may at any time thereafter proceed as Engineer's estimate for these improvements is $ actual cost of improvements at the time they are made, which cost may exceed the Spokane County Engineer's grneet ,Q0€746,fi. ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW Mr. Steve Horobiowski Spokane County Planning Dept. Broadway Center Bldg. N. 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 -0180 tir. Gary Nelson Spokane County Engineers Spokane County Public Works N. 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 -0180 Mr. Michael G. Dempsey Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney -Civil Division W. 1115 Broadway Spokane, Washington 99260 Gentlemen: Re: Sullivan Park Enclosed please find a copy of a second draft of a Developer Agreement. I have highlighted the changes to the first draft for your review. Basically, we feel it is important to acknowledge that the monies being escrowed for the improvements are subject to withdrawal for payment of construction of said improvements. I have also specifically listed the improvements, and per my conversation with Jerry Symmes this date, I have also left a blank for the insertion of a dollar amount for these improvements. Jerry also indicated that the County has a form deed of trust which we will use in lieu of the deed of trust form that I have previously submitted for your review. Please advise as to your comments on the Developer Agreement at your earliest convenience. Thank you. DMB /slm Enclosure cc: R.A. Hanson Company Simpson Engineers April 5, 1990 Very ' ly o✓ s 1 4 / 4/ DR 0, . BODKER Attorney at Law 5. 1401 GRAND BLVD.. SUITE 203 NORTH Jfioiagee. iieh:nf nL ,PA90Z9 HAND DELIVERED (509) 456-5100 FAX: (509) 456 -5114 DEVELOPER AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this day of April, 1990, by and between R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer" and SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at W. 1116 Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as the "County ", jointly referred to as the "Parties ", W I T N E S S E T H: FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES GNU' DATE _ DRAFT NO,_12_ WHEREAS, Developer received preliminary plat approval from the County for Sullivan Park Center, PE- 1504 -85, 2E- 180 -78, on March 25, 1986, and WHEREAS, Developer wishes to obtain approval of Final Plat from the County, and WHEREAS, the County has required, as a Condition of Approval of Final Plat, that Developer construct certain improvements in the form of roads,^ landscaping, sprinkler system, and lighting, all pursuant to that certain Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Planning Report dated October 25, 1985, and WHEREAS, it is required that Developer post a bond or provide other security for the construction of said improvements before the Final Plat will be approved, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the covenants made hereinafter and the mutual benefits to be derived by the Parties hereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. Developer shall grant a deed of trust to the County of all the property contained within the proposed Final Plat. The grant of said deed of trust to the County shall be made for the purposes of pledging said real estate to the County as security for the full performance by Developer of the construction of those improvements required in the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Planning Report Conditions of Approval dated October 24, 1985. it is acknowledged and understood between the - 4- parties hereto that Developer intends to sell approximately 82 acres of the property contained within the Final Plat to Price Development Company, a Utah corporation, within fifteen (15) days of the filing of the Final Plat. Developer is to receive a cash sum of money from Price Development Company as and for the purchase of said property. It is therefore agreed between Developer and the County that at such time that Developer receives cash proceeds from said sale, then Developer agrees to deposit $ into a savings certificate and /or bank savings account to cover the cost of the construction of roads, landscaping, lighting and sprinkler system as required in the aforementioned Conditions of Approval. As such time as $ are deposited as set forth above, then the County will reconvey and release its deed of trust and the County will accept an assignment from Developer of said funds. Said assignment to the County by Developer of the savings certificate and /or cash funds shall then represent full and adequate security for the construction improvements required of Developer in lieu of a bond therefore. 2. Developer agrees to execute assignment agreements in a form acceptable to the County for the purpose of substituting the cash collateral for the aforementioned deed of trust. 3. County agrees that Developer shall be entitled to all interest earned on the escrowed funds, which interest shall be added to the principal sums in escrow and utilized by Developer in constructing the above - referenced improvements. County agrees that as the improvements are constructed, the progress payments for same shall be released from escrow and paid to the contractor performing such work. 4. County agrees that the $ comprised of the following amounts: - Road (Indiana Avenue) - $ Landscaping _ $ Lighting _ $ Sprinkler System $ set forth herein is County further agrees that at such time as actual bids from contractors are received for construction of the above - referenced improvements, then the $ shall be reduced by the difference between the actual bid from a bonded contractor and the amount set forth above fdr each of the specific improvements. -2- f IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above - written. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE, , Clerk of the Board By Deputy Clerk -3- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY By By By Patricia Mummey - Chairman Steven Hasson John McBride DEVELOPER: R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. By R.A. Hanson - President c % EQ;4742 ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW Mr. Steve Horobiowski Spokane County Planning Dept. Broadway Center Bldg. N. 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 -0180 Mr. Gary Nelson Spokane County Engineers Spokane County Public Works N. 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 -0180 Gentlemen: Re: Sullivan Park April 3, 1990 Mr. Michael G. Dempsey Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney -Civil Division W. 1115 Broadway Spokane, Washington 99260 S. 1401 GRAND BLVD.. SUITE 203 NORTH 4001-attE, #1 n 9920,5' 15081456-5100 FAX: (502) 456 -5114 PIC-' IM APR 0 41990 SP0'MiE COUGTY ENGINEER Enclosed please find a copy of a Developer Agreement which I have drafted pursuant to our discussions last month. Price Development Company has indicated that they cannot place the purchase money funds into an escrow before closing, so I have drafted the Agreement to provide for interim security in the form of a deed of trust in favor of Spokane County, pending the close of sale to Price, at which time a portion of the cash proceeds will be used as security for the improvements to be constructed by R.A. Hanson Company. Jim Legat has informed me that since the proposed sewer will not be a public sewer, his office will not require that money be escrowed or a bond posted for these improvements. Do any of you feel that I should specifically list the improvements which are to be secured by the deed of trust? Steve Horobiowski Gary Nelson Michael Dempsey April 3, 1990 Page Two I would appreciate hearing from each of you as soon as possible regarding any comments that you may have regarding this matter, and I would also like to thank each of you for your continuing patience and assistance. DMB /slm Enclosure cc: R.A. Hanson Company Simpson Engineers Very t /uly yo s DREW M. BODKER Attorney at Law DEVELOPER AGREEMENT U ;„-. r FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES UIYLY DATE g DRAFT NO. This Agreement is made and entered into this day of April, 1990, by and between R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer" and SPOKANE COUNTY, a political, subdivision of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at W. 1116 Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as the "County ", jointly referred to as the "Parties ", W I T N E S S E T H : WHEREAS, Developer received preliminary plat approval from the County for Sullivan Park Center, PE- 1504 -85, ZE- 180 -78, on March 25, 1986, and WHEREAS, Developer wishes to obtain approval of Final Plat from the County, and WHEREAS, the County has required, as a Condition of Approval of Final Plat, that. Developer construct certain improvements in the form of roads, sewer, landscaping, lighting, etc., all pursuant to that certain Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Planning Report dated October 25, 1985, and WHEREAS, it is required that Developer post a bond or provide other security for the construction of said improvements before the Final Plat will be approved, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the covenants made hereinafter and the mutual benefits to be derived by the Parties hereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. Developer shall grant a deed of trust to the County of all the property contained within the proposed Final Plat. The grant of said deed of trust to the County shall be made for the purposes of pledging said real estate to the County as security for the full performance by Developer of the construction of those improvements required in the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Planning Report Conditions of Approval dated October 24, 1985. It is acknowledged and understood between the parties hereto that Developer intends to sell approximately 82 acres of the property contained within the Final Plat to Price Development Company, a Utah corporation, within fifteen (15) days of the filing of the Final Plat. Developer is to receive a cash sum of money from Price Development Company as and for the purchase of said property. It is therefore agreed between Developer and the County that at such time that Developer -1- receives cash proceeds in a sufficient sum to adequately cover the cost of the construction of all required improvements as set , r forth in the aforementioned Conditions of Approval, then at that i time the County will reconvey and release its deed of trust and the County will accept an assignment from Developer of a savings•- certificate and /or bank account deposits of a portion of the funds received from Price Development Company. Said assignment to the County by Developer of the savings certificate and /or cash funds shall then represent full' and adequate security for the construction improvements required of Developer in lieu of a bond therefore. 2. Developer agrees to execute assignment agreements in a form acceptable to the County for the purpose of substituting the cash collateral for the aforementioned deed of trust. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above - written. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE, Clerk of the Board By Deputy Clerk - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY By By By By Patricia Mummey - Chairman Steven Hasson John McBride DEVELOPER: R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. R.A. Hanson - President Filed for Record at Request of Nance Address City and State whose address is described real property in First American Title Insurance Company Drew M. Bodker S. 1401 Grand Blvd. 11203 N Spokane, Washington 99203 Deed of Trust (For Use in the Stone of Washington Only ) THIS DEED OF TRUST, made this day of April 90 19 ,between R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation ,GRANTOR, P.O. Box 7400, Spokane, Washington 99207 and FIRST AMERICAN TITLE IWSUJOQNF rs OAvenue, a California corporation Spokane, Washington 99204 TRUSTEE, whose address is SPOKANE COUNTY, a Municipal corporation W. 1116 Broadway, Spokane, Washington 99260 THIS SPACE PiOVIUEU FUR uECOnUER'S USE: , BENEFICIARY, whose address 18 WITNESSETH: Grantor hereby bargains, sells and conveys to Trustee in Trust, with power of sale, the following Spokane County, Washington: SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE THIS DEED OF TRUST is given as security for that certain Developer Agreement dated April , 1990, between the parties hereto. The term "note" as used in this Deed of Trust shall be substituted throughout by the term "Developer Agreement ". Thus, all obligations referred to herein by the reference of the word note or promissory note, shall mean those obligations of the Developer as set forth in the aforementioned Developer Agreement. which real property is not used principally for agricultural or farming purposes, together with all the tenements, hereditaments, and nppurlenances now or hereafter thereunto belonging or in any wise appertaining, and the rents, issues and profits thereof. This deed is for the purpose of securing performance of each agreement of grantor herein contained, and payment of the aunt of all sums requi red under the Developer Agreement Dollars ($ with interest, in accordance with t terms of a promissory note of even date herewith, payable to Beneficiary or order, and made by Grantor, and all renewals, 'modifications and extensions thereof, and also such further suns as may be advanced or loaned by Beneficiary to Grantor, or any of their successors or assigns, together with interest thereon at such rate as shall be agreed upon. To protect the security of Ibis Deed of Trust, Grantor covenants and agrees: 1. To keep the property in good condition and repair; to permit no waste thereof; incomplete any building, structure or improvement being built tanking to he built thereon: to restore promptly any building, structure or improvement thereon which may be damaged or destroyed; and to comply with all laws, ordi- nances. regulation', covenants, conditions and restrictions affecting the property. 2. To pay before delinquent all lawful taxes and assessor eats upon the property; to keep the properly free and oleo r of all other charges. liens or encumbrances impairing the security of This Deed of Trust. 3. 'to keep all buildings now or hereafter erected on the property described herein continuously insured against loss by fire or other hounds in on amount not less Ihsnlhe total debt secured by this Deedu('I'nist. All polities sltall beheld by the Beneficiary,and be in such companies as Ilse Beneficiary may approve and have loss payable first to the Beneficiary, as it' interest may appear. and then to the Grantor. The amount collected under any insurance policy may he applied talon any indebtedness hereby secured in such order as the Beneficiary shall determine. Such npplirnt inn by the Beneficiary shill not rouse discontinuance of any proceedings to foreclose this Deed of 'Ernst. In the event of foreclosure, all rights of the Grantor in insurance policies then in force shall puss to the pll rusk "Pr al Ilte foreclosure ale. 4. To defend any action nr proceeding purporting to affect the sertuity hereof or Ibr riglts ur pnwrls of Ile nrlic or Trustee. oml In par nil rusts and ex- penses, including cost of title senrrh mid attorney's fees in a rensonnble amount, in any sorb action or proceeding, and in any suit brought by Beneficiary to Inrrrlosr this Deed of Trust. 5 'I'r, one all terns. fees nod eilritsrs in connectionw ill this Deednf 'host, including the expenses of the Trustee incurred in enforcing the obligation secured 1 IL ribwl, Itcueli, i ., .• . boy may pay ,;. .:: e and the u .0 paid, with iuleu rot ult6r r set ha ill in the n r ue: I het rL}', aL;,ll lye uJdc,i u,: become • .t of the debt seemed in this I Iced of 'Forst. IT IS NII'FUAI.1.V AGREEI)1 11A'I': 1. In the even) nrly portion of the property is taken or damaged in an eminent domain proceeding, the entire amount of the award or such portion as may be necessary 1n fully satisfy the obligation secured hereby, shall he paid to Beneficiary to be applied to said obligation. 2. Ily accepting payment of any sum secured hereby after its due date, Beneficiary does not waive its right to require prompt payment when due of all other sums so secured or to declare defa for failure le so pay. 3. The Trustee shall reronvey all or any part of the property covered hy this Deed of Trust to the person entitled thereto, on written request of the Grantor and the Beneficiary, or upon satisfaction of the obligation secured and written request for reconveyance made by the Beneficiary or the person entitled thereto. 4. !loon default by Grantor in the payment of any indebtedness secured hereby or in the performance of any agreement contained herein, all sums secured hereby shall immediately become due std payable at the npl inn of the Beneficiary. In such event and upon written request of Ileneficiary,Tnvslee shall sell the trust property, in seem dance with the Deed of Trust Act of the Slate of Washington, at public ;maim' to the highest bidder. Any person excepl'Frustee may hid at Trustee's sale. 'Trustee sh apply the proceeds of the sale as follows; (I1 In the expense of the sole, including a reasonable Trustee's fee and attorney's fee; (2) to the obligation secured by this Deed of 'Trust; (1) the surplus, if any shall be distributed to the persons entitled thereto. 5. '1'naytee shall deliver to Ilse purchaser nl the sole its deed, without warranty, which shall convey to the purchaser the interest in the property which Grantor had or had the power to convey nl the time of his execution of This Deed of Trust, and such as he any have acquired thereafter. Trustee's deed shall recite the facts showing that the sale was conducted) in compliance with all the requirements of law ouil of This Deed of Trust, which recital shall be prima facie evidence of such compliance and rouelusive evidence thereof iu favor of bona fide purchaser and encumbruncers for value. 6. The power of sale conferred by this Deed of Trust and by the Deed of Trust Ac( of the Sint e of Washington is not an exclusive remedy; Beneficiary may cause this Deed of 'Trust to be foreclosed as a man gage. • 7. In the even) of the death, incapacity, disability or resignation of Trustee, Beneficiary may appoint in writing a successor trustee, and upon the recording of sorb appointment in the mortgage records of the county in which this Decd id Trust is recorded, the successor trustee shall be vested with all powers of the original trustee. The Insoles is not obligated In nudity any party hereto of pending sale under any other Deed of Trust or of any action or proceeding in which Grantor, Trustee or Beneficiary shall are 0 party unless such nclion or proceeding is brought by the Trustee. 8. This Deed of Trust applies lo, inures to the benefit of, nod is minding not only on the parties hereto, but on their heirs, devisees, legatees. administrators, executors and assigns. The term Beneficiary shall mean the holder and owner of the note secured hereby, whether or not named as Beneficiary herein. R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC, STA'T'E OF \VASIIING'I'0N }SS. COUN'T'Y OF On This day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individualts) described in and who executed the within' and foregoing instrument, and ack- nowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seul this day of , 19 Notary I'uhlic in and for the State of 1Vashinglon, residing at Dated 19 By R.A. Hanson - President S'I'A'I'E OF WASI IINCPON 11 COUNTY OF Spokane 11 0n this _. - -. day of _ Apr before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the Suite of Washington, duly com- missioned and sworn, personally appeared R.A. Hanson *AA to me known to be the Presidentk Ct %x x x x)(x x x x x xAb O(Atil.X xvicmot7f9dxor R_A _Hanson Colnpan Inc the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instru- ment lobe the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute (he sold instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the Slate of Washington, residing at REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEYANCE no not record. To be used only when note has been paid. TO: TRUSTEE. The undersigned is the legal owner and holder of the note and all other indebtedness secured by the within Deed of 'Ernst. Said note, together with all other indebtedness secured hy said Heed of 'Trust, has been fully paid and satisfied; and you are hereby requested and directed, on payment to you of any sums owing to you under the terms of said Deed of Trust, to cancel said note above mentioned, and all other evidences of indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust delivered to you he ewil h, together wil h 1 he said Deed of Trust, and to recohvey, without warranty, to the parties designated by the terms of said Deed of Trust, all the estate now held by you thereunder. On not lose or destroy this Herd of Must 0R 11!!:' NOTE which it serum's. Roth must be delivered to the Trustee for cancellation before reconcryance will be made. That portion of Sections 11 as follows: EXHIBIT "A" 13 and 14, T. 25 M, R. 44 Eadi. described • Begin at the NW corner of said Section 13; thence 3 02 ' along the West line of said Section 13, 60.72 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence 3 69'57 81.37 feet to the Beginning of a nontangent curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 40.00 feet and a radial bearing of 9 87'13'37 •W; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 71 , an arc distance of 49.64 feet; thence S 73'52'58 "E 384.82 feet b to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 1442.00 feet; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 12 an arc distance of 309.04 feet; thence 3 28 23'47 "W radial to said curve 92.0a feet; thence S 37'11'15 °W 126.03 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 633.00 feet and a radial bearing of N38'25'17 "E, said point being on the Northerly R/W of the E -NS ramp for Interstate 90 (I -90) at Sullivan Road; thence Westerly through a central angle of 41 an arc distance of 454.98 feet; thence S 87'14'19 °W, along said Northerly R/W 200.29 feet to the line between said Sections 13 i 14; thence Continuing S 87'14'19 "W along the Northerly R/W of the NS -W ramp for I -90 at Sullivan Road, 1048.61 feet to the Northerly R/W of said I -90; thence M 77 along said Northerly line, 216.86 feet; thence N 76'55'02 °U, along said Northerly line, 1550.20 feet; thence M 76'10'41•W,, along said: Mortherly_.11ne,;,.620,00 feet/ thence M 56'26'27•W 778.50 feet; thence N 06'20'10°W 950.00 feet to a point s on curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6684.56 feet and a radial bearing of 5 06'28'18 "E, said point being on the Southerly R/W of the Union Pacific Railroad; thence Easterly, along said R/W, through a central angle of 11'17'05° an arc distance of 1316.56 feet; thence N 72 "E, along said R/W 551.72 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 964.95 feet and a radial bearing of S 53'51'00 ■W, said point being on the Southwesterly line of the State Parks Department Property as . shown on .. Record of Survey filed in Survey book 41 page 84; the next 6 courses are along said Southwesterly line, thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 9'28'38 °, an arc distance of . 159.67. feet; thence 3 45'37'38 0 E 912.03 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 2874.80 feet; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 11'48'30 ", an arc distance of 592.48 feet; thence 9 57'26'08•E 588.09 feet;thenco S 32 10.00 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave to the Northeast with radius of 5749.58 feet and a • radial bearing of 3 32 ° 33'52 "W; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 5 arc distance of 601.43 feet to the Westerly R/W of Sullivan Road; thence S 03'24'03 along said Westerly R/W, 164.40 teeti thence S 02'46'23 "E, along said Westerly R/W, 37.28 feet; thence S 69 57'29 "E 59.67 feet to the True P.O.B. EXCEPT State Right of Way. Situete'in the County of Spokane State of Washington._. Ir . PE- 1504 -8E, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER p IN REFERENCE TO THE . 'ACHED FINDINGS 8 ORDER, THE H ING EXAMINER COMMITTEE i yLANNING REPORT CONDITIONS OF API-ROYAL ATTACHED HERETO: 1. That the below listed conditions of all Departments and Agencies are binding upon the applicant, owner(s) of the property, heirs, successors or assigns. Dlj %KL T COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2. The preliminary plat of record approval is for the property legally described in the application for this proposal. 3. That the final plat(s) or phases be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record as legally described and advertised. 'owever, the Subdivision Administrator may grant administrative approvals for divisions of land as provided by State law or local ordinance provided such divisions are consistent with the concept plan.] 4. The Spokane County Subdivision Administrator shall review any proposed Final Plat to insure compliance with the Findings and Conditions of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. 4k11 final plats shall illustrate the 200 ft. setback from the ordinary high water mark pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act') 5. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval• for three (3) years to November 1, 1988. The applicant may request an Extension of Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 6. Upon filing the Final Plat the zone change of the Final Plat area shall be finalized and the existing Agricultural and Restricted Industrial zone classifications shall be in accordance with the zoning concept plan. 7. ?rior to finalization of any part of the project, the existing Burlington Northern railroadlines through the western portion of the property will be either acquired and abandoned or, relocated ,to the north of Indiana Avenue along the riparian park on the preliminary plat. 8. The applicant shall submit evidence that anystructures; located within the development are compatible -with easement rights ,of any grantees of record, i.e., transmission lines prior to building permit release. 9. Prior to the finalization of Phase I, the general area shown as the .riparian'park• shall be owned and maintained as a passive park by the _? roperty .Owners.Association.to be formed by the purchasers of lots within the project. Specific conditions, covenants and restrictions relating to maintenance and use of the park shall be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Zoning Administrator and filed with the Spokane County Auditor. Nothing within this condition shall prohibit the sponsor or P'r subsequent owners from reaching agreements for the use or transfer of the Os, A riparian park to Spokane County. It is the intention of this condition to provide for regular maintenance of the passive park and retain it for public use. 1 " . HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) Planning Department (Cont'd) 1�0.1 That the planting and maintenance of the limited access areas shown as pen pac at the Sullivan Road /I- 90'interchange and south of Indiana shall a provided by applicant or successors consistent with road _landscaping requirements of Spokane County and the State of Washington. 11. The open space plantings and maintenance at the proposed Evergreen;.; ; interchange shall be provided by the applicant or successor at the time the interchange is established. '12 \ The boulevard treatment landscaping for.Indiana will be established,, � � provided for as part of Phase'I "finalization by the applicant or successors 13. That a F..inal`Plat'name i be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. X14/. That appropriate utilityTeasements',be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat, for distribution to the CountyPlanningDepartment, i =Utili.ties:Department, Engineering Department, Health District and applicable!utili_ty; companies. phi _ pnreva >efsaivtrlitvreasements ^ a eb=saidads i ♦ ill = mDdnaeswmusEbeaztema r w th tie aubfii of_ ttrc� na!l ;ay. THIS f4N BE D.✓I? LJHEN FINAL rCAf I $ ,jimnl OONk so f J N it En "ntno_S C - ne rw, a. FIMAL rLAT. 15. That a current certificate aftitle:'be furnished the County Department prior to filing the final plat. . 16. That the provisions of SEPALS NOTICEAF2ACTION, pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the project applicant within thirty;(30) days;ofr,finalAisppsition a pf ahis2apptication;.,and prior to any on -site improvements unless the applicant(s) /sponsor(s) choose to file a notarized Waiver of Notice of Action with the Spokane County Planning Department. • 17. A specific landscapezplan ,planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane;Counry Administrator be submitted with a performance bond for lots to be developed prior to release of building permits. 18. That a plan for,Watir facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection be approved by the waterasupplier fire protection48isti9 t;. Spokane.:CountyrBui.l:ding &Safety Department- -and County;heal.th. authorities. The agencies will certify on the WATER PLAN, prior to the filing of the final plat or any phase of the preliminary plat that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The WATER PLAN and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. \_ • HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) Planning Department (Cont'd) The purveyor will also certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved WATER PLAN. The time schedule will provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat sponsor shall also sign the WATER PLAN to confirm the contractual arrangements or agreements. The final plat dedication will contain the following statement: "the public water system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building & Safety Department, and water purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot.' 19. That no:occupanty permit;,will be issued for any lot within the Final Plat until certified by a WashingtonAState.al3;censed: engineer.. "that the water system has been installed pursuant the approved WATER PLAN.for the Final Plat", signed and stamped by said engineer. The certification may be in the form of a letter but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the WATER PLAN as a schematic map showing the "As Built" water system. 20 Approval by the Zoning Admini a specific light giand.s igning plan for the described property prior'to the release of any building" permits. 21. The applicant sha1j develop subject property ,generally -in accordance. within: the - concept presented °,to:•;the Hearing;Examiner Committee Variations when approved by the - Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape .plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the 1986 Spokane County Zoning Code. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. '22. All .mdii :gat1i1iiieasures set forth in theffinal2EIS be complied with and has been agreed to by the applicant. 23. That the project is subject to the Aquifer Sensi:tivEArea:OYerlay'Zoriehof the County_ Ordinance; which sets forth various measures for p te .: Aquifer rotection; specifically, measures dealing with wastewater disposal, spill protection measures and stormwater runoff. pee t4 ,,. putt -) (2.4,C!)(L ,5. r+toM. -f • 7 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) QuqJrAiJcv Department (Cont'd) 24. The applicant shall provide sight- obscuring cyclooe:fencing,6 in l4 height along the southerly borders of Lots 1 through 9 of the preliminary plat and along the westerly edge of Lots 10 and 11 which adjoin properties not within the development. Additionally, the applicant shall provide a 6 ft. sight- obscuring fence along Lot 27 in the area which has been indicated by the applicant in a site plan amendment to be dedicated as non - developable. This area is approximately 500 ft. wide extending westerly of Flora Road. (OUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT 1. That conditional approval' of the plat is given subject to dedication of Right -of -Way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat'of record. 2. That plans, profiles, and cross. sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed._ProfessionaIGivil „Engineer. 3. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional, Civil/ Engineer. 4. That the regulations of the, National 'Flood`Insdrahte'.Prbgram"be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. La NGNR 5. That appropriate provisions be made that the following described property”: be held Irtilitt the continuation of the -street• be dedicated'or deeded: A 1-ft.. strip at the ends or edges of streets that terminate or border the final plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) L NG .M,.; 6. A statement must appear in the dedicatory language of the final 1' t: "that individual driveway access permits be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system." L.A00 11 7. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that nowdir_ecraccess2be allowed fr_omclots4o4Su11,ivan;Road),, 8. That all publ,ic;roadswithin the plat be designed andconstructed to >SpoKane County ^standards.„ c :3\ p.n0 11. That access,to Evergreen Road from parcels?12, 15, 16 and 17 is i � prohibited :1 E ,e „A^ 14. That prior to finalization of the proposed plat, the applicant shall wi submit to the County Engineer for review and approval 'Ty15it51 Roadwayt CrossSectionsfor the following proposed roadways: ti V v 9 � i / a. Indiana Avenue Sullivan to the proposed Evergreen intersection. � L b. Indiana Avenue from the proposed Evergreen intersection to the connection with the existing Indiana Avenue at the west end of the g e proposal. c. Evergreen Road south of Indiana Avenue, between Indiana and the proposed Evergreen interchange. d. Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus. 15. The typical roadway cross section for the roadway which connects the proposed;Evergreen;:.Road• with the proposed Indiana Avehue in the westerly portion of the plat shall be typical:aroadwaywsection No:jl access standard. - w p.se+ 0 1 2 VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER 9. That the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engihee prom�o al_;acceptable to the►State Hi g ay D -the proposed State g:way- County Road intersection. h State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be receiveToori to the filing of the final °lat. Improvements to the State Higf•wa are o be the responsibility of the sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. This shall include both Phase I and Phase II designs. That the applicant shall coordinate with the Spokane County Parks and Recreation Department and the County Engineer's Department to provide a i pathway the northern portion of the project paralleling' the Spokane River. This pathway would be provided in lieu of bicycle lanes along the proposed arterial streets. That the applicant shall submit to the County_Engineer.an intersection plan for the Ev ergreen- local_access-roadlocated south of Indiana. 13. The proposed ,plat % shat l be ,_ mproved' to the standards. set forth i n ;.Spokane , mcounty_Board_of,: County .Commissi,o`ners:Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which established regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 16 That the typical roadway cross section for the cul.= de� set-which is proposed east of Sullivan Road and extends southeasterly from Indiana Avenue shall be typicalnroadway ;section No 1 icceis °standard. N 1 . HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department ( Cont'd) 17. That prior`. >to recordin`g` %of the final plat, the Burlington Northern ail _Rroad;l,ine which runs through portions of the proposal an both the east and west sides of Sullivan Road, shal.l--be = abandoned -or- relocated. Prior to release - of a building permit for those portions of the proposal identified as Phase I,'the applicant shall: - u -- , 18,. Obtain - permits for raadway`tonstructionlfrom the appropriate state and ,. county agencies (Spokane County Engineer). 19. ,Improve the Sull,ivan,Road,Inter.section • in a manner consistent with the approved plans and as set forth in the supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. 20. Construct those roadways which are identified in the supplemental Environmental Impact Statement as being necessary in order to accommodate traffic volumes which will be generated by Phase I. Construction shall be in conformance with the approved roadway plans and typical roadway cross - sections. - Roadwaynconstruction must be completedprior_?to the release of building permits or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction improvements, construction certification, "as- built" plans, and monumenting the street centerline shall be filed with the County Engineer. •Construct•a connection LLto_the_ezistingIndiana°Avenuewhich is located to the south and west of the westerly boundary of the proposed plat. It shall be theapplicant's responsibility to obtain the necessary right -of -way alignment for this connection. This connection must provide for a smooth transition between the existing Indiana Avenue and that which is proposed within the plat. The transition alignment shall be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer. The County Engineer will provide assistance during right -of -way negotiations should it be necessary. 22. Construction the proposed public "streets'and - easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a eer- /-surveyor;` who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as- built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 23. The applicant shall mit. „for approval by the. Spok'an'e :County_ hijtif`er and the SpokiiiFCounty Health District'a detailed combined on?site sewage • system' "plan and surface =water <'disposal = plan' for the proposed building site prior to the issuance of any.;:building:=permi,t : on the property. l HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 24. A parkingTplan and traffic:circulation_plan for proposed building sites shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane`County prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing, as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. 25. The construction of the road - improvements :stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County..Engineer. 26. All required improvements'shall conform to the current State Washington Standard_ Specifications._for..Road and.8ri dge.Construction and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 27. ;Roadwaystandards" typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane,Board of- County "Commissioners` Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 28. Should the Phase I development include those portions of the property lying east of Sullivan Road, the applicant will be required to construct the Sullivan°Road_improvemeWand interchange modifications which are scheduled for construction in order to accommodate Phase II of the proposal. 29. Thatdna a a Avenue east ef.'•.Sullivan shall be constructed per the approved plans and typical roadway cross - section .ff properties eastiof Sullivan Road areincluded'in Phase I. 30. That the'Cou nt'y Engineer iiiy;;permittIndiana°Avenue: east of Sullivan Road to function as a privateer road - providing that _ the`roadway is constructed in accordance with Spokane County public road standards and in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross - section. 31. That the applicant must obtain permits,to perform work in the County road right'mo_fiwayx ) the+County3Engiheer No work will be performed within the County road right -of -way without a permit. 32. If =IndianrAvenueTe_astsof Sullivan Road is to :function "as a priyateroadr then the applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This document ;provides ^the fol.l.owing:7 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County, Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Section 3.07, Sections A & B of that title. 33. The traffic generated by the proposed project will have a significant. impact upon Sullivan Road between Interstate 90 and Sprague Avenue. It is anticipated that a two- way_left .turn a ane'will be needed to accommodate turning movements along the Sprague to I -90 corridor. This left turn lane will be required prior!to the construction of Phase.Il: Prior to the commencement of Phase-INT/it will be necessary to improve Sullivan Road to a seven The proposed Design Report for the Evergreen Interchange shall also include a review of traffic conditions along the Sullivan Road /I -90 corridor. The above specified roadway improvements shall be considered within that analysis. It shall be the applicant'sresponsibility to pay for the costs of right -of -way ,acquisition ;and roadway improvements along Sullivan between I=90'and Sprague for Phase II. Should other land development occur along the Sprague /I -90 Corridor which has measurable traffic impacts (i.e. large commercial or industrial uses) then a formula for participation in the sharing of costs for roadway improvements will be developed by the County Engineer. The formula will consider the traffic volumes generated by Sullivan Park Center as well as other identified traffic generators. For the Phase III improvements, a formula for the assessment of costs will be developed by the County Engineer in cooperation with the applicant. Of principal consideration in the development of the formula will be the traffic volumes generated by this project, traffic generated by other projects and other traffic utilizing the roadway. 34. That priortoythe initiation of P.hasexII'of the proposed development, the applicant will conduct an updated2traffic2study6 This study may be included within the design report which will` be prepared for the Evergreen Road Interchange. The Design Report shall also consider the impacts upon the County Road System of the extension of a connection to Mission Avenue from the proposed Evergreen Interchange. This analysis shall include potential traffic impacts upon Evergreen Road between Sprague Avenue and the connection. • t;, HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department ( Cont'd) STD, Hz ge- PHAS Roadway construction and improvements for Phase II of the proposal shall be consistent with the improvements which have been identified within the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. Those improvements are as follows: 35. Construction and upgrading of the Sullivan Road- Indiana intersection in a manner consistent with the plans which have been improved by the Spokane Ccunty Engineer and the State of Washington Department of Transportation. 36. Construction of new freeway interchange at or near the alignment of Evergreen Road as identified within the Supplemental EIS. 37. Construction of Evergreen Road from Indiana Avenue southward to the proposed freeway interchange. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross- section. 38. Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed Evergreen Road) shall be improved to a five -lane facility from Evergreen Road westerly to the connection with the existing Indiana Avenue. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross- section. That Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed plat) must be widened to provide additional traffic lanes in order to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. A five lane facility is required to mitigate the traffic impacts upon Indiana Avenue and adjoining business properties. A plan for the upgrade of the intersection at Pines and Indiana must be submitted to the County Engineer as specified in condition #9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to secure the additional right -of -way for the improvement of Indiana Avenue. 39. Indiana Avenue (east of Sullivan Road) shall be constructed as a five -lane facility from Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus of the project. Indiana shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. 40. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to function as a private road, providing that the roadway is constructed in accordnace with Spokane County Public Road Standards in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross - section. 41. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County road right -of -way from the County. Engineer. No work will be performed within the County road right -of -way without a permit. '07 t HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 42. If Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This document provides the following: That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road Improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Section 3.07, Sections A and 8 of that title. 43. Should the Evergreen Interchange Design Report determine that the level of improvements as specified within the Suplemental EIS are not necessary for Phase II, then the County Engineer may approve a phased plan for roadway construction or design deviations for Phase II roadway improvements. 44. That a public road Right -of -Way connection shall be provided to properties which are located to the south and east of Parcels #27 and #28 as depicted on the preliminary plat. This will require a redesign of the plat in this area. PHASE III 45. The roadway improvements for Phase III identified within the Supplemental EIS are the connection from the new freeway interchange at Evergreen Road southward to Mission Avenue and the possible connections northward and eastward of the proposal. The need for these improvements will be addressed in the development of the Evergreen Interchange Design Report. The level of improvements, assignment of financial responsibility for improvements and timing of construction will be determined on the basis of traffic volumes, location of facilities and traffic safety related issues. 46. Phase III improvements as identified by the Design Report shall be constructed prior to the commencement of Phase III construction. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Health District (COnt'd) 2. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: °A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage system shall not be authorized." 3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social & Health Services. 4. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 5. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. The dedication shall state: The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System. Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Connection to the Valley sewer system is to be made prior to release of occupancy permits for any structures within the site. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1. That the applicant obtain necessary approval from the Department of Transportation for each phase of the project prior to finalization. 2. That the applicant submit proof to the Planning Department file that Washington State Department of Transportation conditions have been satisfactorily handled prior to finalization of any portion of the preliminary plat. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) WASHINGTON STATE OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION 1. In the event that archaeological or historic resources are discovered during project activities, the applicant or successor shall notify the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation in Olympia, Washington. J � / 9 Date Chairperson 1 �� v 6 . /11 / 2 , ; r LI In reply refer to: UE Mr. Drew M. Bodker Attorney and Counselor at Law S. 1401 Grand Blvd. Suite 203 North Spokane, Washington 99203 Dear Mr. Bodker: Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Upper Columbia Area Room 561, U.S. Court House West 920 Riverside Avenue Spokane, Washington 99201 -1083 March 14, 1990 Per your letter dated February 23, 1990, you requested permission to construct a road across Bonneville Power Administration's (BPA) rights -of -way. The affected sections of rights -of -way are under BPA's Trentwood - Valley Way 115 -kV line, between Structures 1/11 and 2/1, and the Vera Tap to the Valley Way Tap 115 -kV line, between Structures 1/3 and 1/5. In addition to the crossing permit, you are also requesting that BPA relocate Structure 1/4 of the Vera Tap to the Valley Way Tap 115 -kV line. We reviewed the concept of this request and have no objections. Conditions of the required permit would include the following: 1. The entity (requester) requesting the structure relocation would pay all costs associated with the relocation of the structure. BPA would perform the required design and construction work. 2. All National Electric Safety Code and BPA clearance standards will be met. 3. Access to the transmission line structures, and to and along the right -of -way by BPA's maintenance crews, shall not be interfered with or obstructed. 5. BPA's right -of -way shall be restored to its orginal condition or better, following construction. Any damage to BPA property resulting from the proposed use shall be repaired at the requester's expense. 6. A minimum distance of 25 feet shall be maintained between edge of right -of -way and the wood pole structures. If this clearance cannot be met, guard devices such as barriers, guard rails, and /or posts shall be installed to protect BPA's structures. The proposed road designs (both plan and profile) pertaining to those sections of road involving BPA rights -of -way should be submitted to BPA as soon as practical to avoid untimely construction delays. If you have any questions or need further information, please call Dan Cadman at (509) 353 -2568 or me at (509) 353 -2591. cc w /attachment: 'Gary Nelson Spokane County Engineer's Office Sincerely, Ed Woessner Electrical Engineer 2 cgs £ ��0,dien. ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW Mr. Paul E. Eichin Area Engineer Bonneville Power Administration Room 561 U.S. Courthouse W. 920 Riverside Spokane, Washington 99201 Re: Sullivan Park Mali Dear Mr. Eichin: February 23, 1990 S. 1401 GRAND BLVD.. SUITE 203 NORTH 4 � ayne. 9L910,9 15091456-5100 FAX: (509) 456-5114 This letter is being written to you for the purpose of securing permission from the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) the right to cross under two of your transmission lines for the purpose of constructing certain improvements necessary to the construction of the Sullivan Park Mall, which will be constructed between Evergreen Road on the west, Sullivan Road on the east, the Spokane River on the north, and Interstate 90 on the south, in the Spokane Valley. Specifically, it will be necessary to construct a new roadway, which will be a new Indiana Avenue running between Sullivan Road and Evergreen Road, as a five -lane facility which will then be dedicated to Spokane County. Additionally, there will be necessary utilities brought to the subject property which will also cross under your transmission lines. These will include sewer, water and electricity. The pipe to be used for that portion of the sewer and water which run under your transmission lines will plastic pvc pipe and not iron pipe. Attached to this letter are specific plans which illustrate the location of your transmission lines on the proposed plat. In addition to the construction of the road and other utilities which will cross your transmission lines, 'it will also be necessary to move your pole #k either 140 feet to the south, or 240 feet to the north of its present location. This will be required to accommodate new Indiana Avenue in a location that has been brought about by a re- alignment of the road as requested by Price Development Company (Price Development Company is the developer for the shopping center). It is our understanding that Mr. Paul E. Eichin February 23, 1990 Page Two the process required to obtain formal permission to move the pole may be a very lengthy endeavor, whereas we are seeking approval of our proposed plat from Spokane County as soon as possible. Spokane County has advised us that they will not approve the proposed plat until they receive a written letter from the BPA in which the BPA states that they do not have objection to our proposed plans. This letter is being written to you today for the purpose of seeking a letter from your office which will state to Spokane County that the BPA will allow the construction of the proposed improvements under its transmission lines, provided that the developer, R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., or its successors and assigns, pays for all costs incurred in relocating or raising the aforementioned power pole or poles, or any other such expenses. We also understand that we must meet all of your criteria for the construction of roads and other utilities on your right of way. We respectfully request a response to this letter at your earliest covenience because we cannot proceed to file our plat until we have received approval from the BPA. Thank you for your consideration of this request. If there is any other information that you should require to complete your evaluation, please call me immediately. Thank you. DMB /slm Enclosure cc: R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. Simpson Engineers Very tr ,4ly yo ,s DREW M. BOOKER Attorney for R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. In reply refer to: UE Mr. Drew M. Bodker Attorney and Counselor at Law S. 1401 Grand Blvd. Suite 203 North Spokane, Washington 99203 Dear Mr. Bodker: Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Upper Columbia Area Room 561, U.S. Court House West 920 Riverside Avenue Spokane, Washington 99201 -1083 March 14, 1990 iriEttfitED MAR 16 1990 Per your letter dated February 23, 1990, you requested permission to construct a road across Bonneville Power Administration's (BPA) rights -of -way. The affected sections of rights -of -way are under BPA's Trentwood- Valley Way 115 -kV line, between Structures 1 /11 and 2/1, and the Vera Tap to the Valley Way Tap 115 -kV line, between Structures 1/3 and 1/5. In addition to the crossing permit, you are also requesting that BPA relocate Structure 1/4 of the Vera Tap to the Valley Way Tap 115 -kV line. We reviewed the concept of this request and have no objections. Conditions of the required permit would include the following: 1. The entity (requester) requesting the structure relocation would pay all costs associated with the relocation of the structure. BPA would perform the required design and construction work. 2. All National Electric Safety Code and BPA clearance standards will be met. 3. Access to the transmission line structures, and to and along the right - of - way by BPA's maintenance crews, shall not be interfered with or obstructed. 5. BPA's right -of -way shall be restored to its orginal condition or better, following construction. Any damage to. BPA property resulting from the proposed use shall be repaired at the requester's expense. 6. A minimum distance of 25 feet shall be maintained between edge of right -of -way and the wood pole structures. If this clearance cannot be met, guard devices such as barriers, guard rails, and /or posts shall be installed to protect BPA's structures. 2 The proposed road designs (both plan and profile) pertaining to those sections of road involving BPA rights -of -way should be submitted to BPA as soon as practical to avoid untimely construction delays. If you have any questions or need further information, please call Dan Cadman at (509) 353 -2568 or me at (509) 353 -2591. cc w /attachment: Gary Nelson Spokane County Engineer's Office Sincerely, Ed Woessner Electrical Engineer _gnat Modien. ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW Mr. Gary Nelson Spokane County Engineers Spokane County Public Works N. 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 -0180 Dear Gary: Re: Sullivan Park Enclosed please find a copy of the letter I received from the Bonneville Power Administration which indicates the fact that Bonneville Power has no objection to the proposed Indiana Avenue provided that the conditions outlined in the letter are strickly adhered to. I understand that this will now satisfy the County's requirement that we secure the permission from the BPA before the plat is filed. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please advise. Thank you for your continuing cooperation in this matter. DMB /slm Enclosure cc: R.A. Hanson Company Price Development Company March 20, 1990 Very tru4 y yours, DREW M. BODKER Attorney at Law 5.1401 GRAND BLVD.. SUITE 203 NORTH 13091 456-5100 FAX: (509) 456-5114 r 1 t fry w! 6 • P C MAR 2 21990 SPO(VAfE GOIATY EITL EER REPORT FOR PLAT CERTIFICATE TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY West 521. First Avenue Spokane, Washington 99204 Telephone: (509) 838 -5281 REPORT FOR PLAT CERTIFICATE Refer to: C- 194497 -KC Sinpson Engineers Attn: Steve Davenport N. 909 Argonne Rd. Spokane, Washington This is a report for plat certificate as of January 9, 1990 at 8:00 a.m. covering the following property: That portion of Sections 11, 13 and 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., described as follows: Begin at the northwest corner of said Section 13; thence South 02 ° 46'23" East, along the West line of sai8 Section 13, 60.72 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 69 57'29" East, 81.37 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave t the Northeast with a radius of 40.00 feet and a radial bearing of South 87 West; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 71 06'35 ", an arc distance of 49.64 feet; thence South 73 52'58" East, 384.82 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 1442.00 feet; thence Southeasterly througlg a central angle of 12 an arc distance of 309.04 feet' thence South 28 West, radial to said curve 92.00 feet; thence South 37 6 11'15" West, 126.03 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 633.00 feet and a radial bearing of North 38 East, said point being on the Northerly right - of-way of the E -NS ramp for Intestate 90 (I -90) at Sullivan Road; thence Westerly through a central angle of 41 an arc distance of 454.98 feet; thence South 87 14'19" West, along said Northerly right - of-way 200.29 fe8t to the line between said Sections 13 and 14; thence continuing South 87 14'19" West along the Northerly right-of-way of the NS-W ramp for I -90 at Sullivan Road, 1048.61 feet to the Northerly right - of-way of said I -90; thence North 77 ° 54'39" West, along said Northerly line, 216.86 feet; thenc8 North 76 ° 55'02" West, along said Northerly line, 1550.20 feet; thence North 76 10'41" West, along said Northerly life, 620.00 feet; thence North 56 26'27" West, 778.50 feet; thence North 06 28'18" West 950.00feet to a point on a curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6684.56 feet and a radial bearing of South 06 ° 28'18" Fast, said point being on the Southerly riot -of -way of the Union Pacific Railroad; thence Easterly, along said right -of -way, throug4 a central angle of 11 17'05" an arc distance of 1316.56 feet; thence North 72 East, along said right- of-way 551.72 feet to a point on a curve concave to Northeast with a radius of 964.95 feet and a radial bearing of South 53 51'00" West, said point being on the southwesterly line of the State Parks Department Property on Record of Survey filed in Survey Book 41, page 84; the next six courses are aiong said southwesterly line, thence southeasterly through a central angle of 9 28'38", an arc distance of 159.61 feet; thence south 45 37'38" East, 912.03 - 1 - Re: Hanson cc: County Engineer cc. County Planning feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 2874.80 feet; thence southeasterly through a central angle of 11 ° 48'30 ", an arc di of 592.48 feet; thence South 57 26'08'! East 588.09 feet; thence South 32` West, 10.00 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave to the Northeast with radius of 5749.58 feet and a radial bearing of South 32 West; thence southeasterly through a central angle of 5 ° 59'36 ", an arc distance of 601.43 feet to the westerly right-of-way of Sullivan Road; thence South 03 ° 24'03" East, along said Westerly right -of -way, 164.40 feet; thence South 02 ° 46'23" East, along said Westerly right -of -way, 37.28 feet; thence South 69 ° 57'29" East, 59.67 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington; EXCEPT State Highway riot -of -way. Record Title is vested in R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., a corporation, as to a strip of land 60 feet wide, being 30 feet upon each side, of the center of the Coeur d'Alene and Spokane Railway Company railway line, as granted by deeds, Volume 143, Page 251, and Volume 143, page 272; and Whitworth Foundation, a non -profit corporation, as to the, remainder. SUBJECT T0: 1. Lien of real estate excise sales tax upon any sale of said premises, if unpaid. 2. General taxes for 1990, paid until February 15, (Assessor's Parcel No. 45113.9026; 45114.9031; in the sum of $(not yet available), which cannot be 1990. 11543 -9026; 11544 -9031; 13542 -9040; 14541- 9170(Old), 45132.9040; 45141.9170(new), Code 140) Said taxes affect: Section 11, TWp. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., as to portion of SW1 /4 lying South of SIRR R/W nd Nly of PSH #2, subject to easement; Section 11, TWp. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., as to portion of Gov't Lots 6 -10 and 11 lying Sly of SIRR R/W and SW1y of Sally line of Inland Empire Paper Company R/W and Nly of PSH 42 subject to easement; Section 13, TWp. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., portion of Gov't Lots 3 and 4 described as follows: Beginning at intersection of South line of Inlan4 Erupire Paper Co. RY R/W and North line of Burlington Northern RY, thence N.61 02'04" West to North line of NW1 /4 thence west to east line of Sullivan Road, thence Sly along said East line to Nly line of PSH No.2, thence SE1y along said Nly line to south line of Gov't Lot 3, thence East along said south line to SE corner of said Gov't Lot 3, thence North to Nly line of Burlington Northern RY R/W, thence lily along said Nly line to point of beginning except RR R/W; Section 14, TWp. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., portion of NE1 /4 North of PSH #2. The real estate under search is assessed with other lands. The proposed segregation may require short platting pursuant to Spokane County Short Plat Ordinance. inquiry should be made to the Spokane County Planning Department for compliance. - 2- 3. Irrigation assessment of $(not yet available), by Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19, for 1990. The first half will be delinquent April 30th. The last half will be delinquent October 31st, if unpaid. 4. Inquiry for any charges for irrigation, domestic water, electricity or other Charges district at N North 11220l Irrigation GreenacresRoad, District phone 924 -36 should said 5. Unrecorded Contract of Sale, constructive notice or disclosure of which is given by recital in instrument herein set forth. Disclosed by : Notice of Real Estate Contract Instrument Dated: May 31, 1978 Recorded : June 15, 1978 Auditor's No. : 7806150379 Contract Dated : May 31, 1978 Vendor : Whitworth Foundation, a non -profit corporation Vendee : R.A. Hanson and Company, Inc., a corporation Affects : Said premises and other property 6. Decree of Appropriation filed February 5, 1986, in Spokane County Superior Court Cause Nos. 84202146 -7 and 84202145 -9, wherein the State of Washington appropriated portions of the Northeast quarter of Section 14, Government Lots 3 and 4 of the South half of the North half of Section 13, and the South half of Section 11 for Interstate 90. Said Decree states, in part, as follows: "TOGETHER WITH all rights of ingress and egress, if any (including all existing future or potential easements of access, light, view and air) to, from, and between said SR 90 and the remainder of Tract "X ". EXCEPT that there shall be reasonable ingress and egress to, from and between said Tract "X" and the Sullivan Road Line Survey of said SR 90 Northerly of HES 50+92.16 Lt. and HES 50+63.83 Rt. TOGETHER WITH the right tb enter upon the respondents remaining lands, where necessary, to remove improvements, if any, located wholly or partially upon the right of way." 7. Effect of Relocation Agreement Dated : December 6, 1989 Recorded : December 13, 1989 Auditor's No. : 8912130174 By and Between: The United States of America, AND, The Consolidated Irrigation District, AND, The R.A. Hanson and Company 8. Provisions contained in Order Including Lands and Redefining Boundaries of the Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19, regarding R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., recorded February 15; 1989, under auditor's file No. 8902150286. - 3- 9. A perpetual easement for one or more electric power transmission lines granted to the United States of America, together with the right to clear said land and to keep same clear of brush, timber, structures, and fire hazards. Width : 100 feet Recorded : June 8, 1959 Auditor's No. : 6297118 Section Affects the North 1/2 of SE /4of the NE 1/4, the South 2 of the NE1 /4 of the NE1 /4 and the East 300 feet of the NW1 /4 of the NE1 /4 of Section 14. 10. Easement for pipeline for the transportation of oil, gas and the products thereof wherein the grantee agrees not to build, create or construct or to permit to be built, created or constructed any obstruction, building, engineering works, or other structures over or that would interfere with said pipeline. In Favor of : The Washington Water Power Company, a corporation Recorded : January 8, 1962 Aiiciitor's No. : 8319868 Affects : *see below * AFFECTS: That portion of Sections 11 and 14, lying Sly of the Sly right of way line of Spokane, Coeur d'Alene and Palouse Railroad (Great Northern) and Nly of Primary State Highway No. 2, as now located A 15 foot permanent easement on the South 15 feet of said tract adjacent to the North line of the Freeway (PSH No. 2), the center line of the gas line to be 7 1/2 feet North of the edge of the Freeway right of way and installed with minimum cover of 48 inches. Minimum pipe cover 48 inches. 11 Easement for pipeline for the transportation of oil, gas and the products thereof wherein the grantee agrees not to build, create or construct or to permit to be built, created or constructed any obstruction, building, engineering works, or other structures over or that would interfere with said pipeline. In Favor of : The United States of America Recorded : June 22, 1965 Auditor's No. : 118205C Affects . : portion of said premises and other property - 4 - 12. An easement affecting the portion of said premises and for the purposes stated herein, and incidental purposes. For : The right, privilege and authority to install, reinstall, construct, erect, alter, repair, energize, operate and maintain electric underground transmission and distribution facilities, consisting of vaults, manholes, hardholes, ducts, conduits, cables, wires and other necessary or convenient ads; also the right, privilege, and authority to install, reinstall, construct, erect, alter, repair, energize, operate and maintain at ground level, electric transformer units, electric junction cabinets and/or containers, together with appurtenances necessary or convenient to make said underground and surface installations an integrated electric system and in connection with all the foregoing to cut, trim, or chemically treat trees and shrubbery, to chip and spread branches and other foliage and to pile and stack logs as necessary alongside the cleared right -of -gray in accordance with REA specifications, to the extent necessary to install and maintain said electric system. In Favor of : Inland Per & Light Co., a Washington corporation Recorded : July 28, 1972 Auditor's No. : 640587C Affects : *see below * AFFECTS: That portion of the South half of Section 11, lying North of Primary State Highway No. 90 and that portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM lying North of Primary State Highway No. 90 - Line to be located within a strip of land lying 10 feet right and 10 feet left of the following described line: Beginning at a point which lies 752 feet North of the South line and 187 feet Fast of the West line of Section 11, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM; thence South 73 40' Fast paralleling the North right of way linA. of Primary State Highway No. 90, a distance of 3255 feet, thence South 80 Fa 210 feet to a point 45 feet west of the Past line oX the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 14, thence North 3'12'40" West 1880 feet more or less to the 1987.2 feet contour line, North of the Spokane River and other property. 13. An easement herein, and For In Favor of Recorded Affects affecting the portion of said premises and for the purposes stated incidental purposes. : the right to erect and maintain poles with the necessary wires and fixtures thereon, and to keep same free from foliage. : Pacific States Telephone and Telegraph Company : In Volume 165 of Deeds, Page 305 : The Southeast quarter of Section 11 - 5 - NOTE: The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. has succeeded to rights granted by this easement. 14. An easement herein, and For In Favor of Recorded Affects 15. An easement herein, and For In Favor of Dated Recorded Affects affecting the portion of said premisPs and for the purposes stated incidental purposes. Transmission power line : Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad Company, a corporation : In Volume 344 of Deeds, Page 371 : The NE 1/4 of the NE1 /4 of Section 14. affecting the portion of said premises and for the/purposes stated incidental purposes. : The Sullivan Road, County Road Project No. 116. : Spokane County : October 29, 1948 : In Volume 578 of Deeds, Page 370 : The Fast 30 feet of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, the East 30 feet of the SE1 /4 of Section 11 16. A perpetual easement for one or more electric power transmission lines granted to the United States of America, together with the right to clear said land and to keep same clear of brush, timber, structures; and fire hazards. Width : 150 feet Recorded : November 1, 1948 Auditor's No. : 847007A Affects : the South 1/2 of Section 11 17. Easement for pipeline for the transportation of oil, gas and the products thereof wherein the grantee agrees not to build, create or construct or to permit to be built, created or constructed any obstruction, building, engineering works, or other structures over or that would interfere with said pip In Favor of 1 The Washington Water Power Company Recorded : May 10, 1985 Auditor's No. : 8505100167 • Affects : A 20 ft. strip of land, Nly of and running parallel with and adjoining Washington State Highway SR -90, in the NW1 /4 of the NE1 /4 and the NE1 /4 of the NE1 /4, in Section 14. 18. Bill of Sale recorded December 27, 1940, under Auditor's File No.' 472498A, between Inland Empire Paper Company, a corporation and the Washington Water Power Cody, a corporation, for all of the electrical distribution lines of the first party located in Sections 12 and 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., in Spokane County, Washington; also all easements, right of ways, permits, privileges, and franchises and other licenses, contracts, and rights for or relating to the construction, maintenance and operation of said electrical distribution lines. - 6- 19. An easement of herein, and inc For in Favor of Recorded Auditor's No. Affects fecting the portion of said premises and for the purposes stated idental purposes. : the right to reconstruct and maintain electrical distribu- tion lines. : The Washington Water Power Company, a corporation December 27, 1940 : 472499A : Lots 3 and 4 in the NW1 /4 of Section 13, Twp. 25 North, Range 44 Fast, W.M. 20. An easement affecting the portion of said premises and for the purposes stated herein, and incidental purposes. For : a perpetual easement for use as a public road; In Favor of : Spokane County Recorded : January 21, 1949 Auditor's No. : 859802A Affects : *see below *AFFECTS: a strip'of land 30 feet wide on each side of and parallel with the center line of Sullivan Road, and the West 30 feet of that portion of the northwest quarter of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 Fast, W.M., that lies North of the Spokane Valley Irrigation District canal. 21. Relinquishment of right of amps to state highway and of light, view and air, under terms of Deed to the State of Washington. Recorded : September 28, 1955 Auditor's No. : 344727B Affects : Lots 3 and 4, Section 13 22. Right of Entry Executed By In Favor Of : Hanson Properties, Inc. : The Washington Water Power Company, and /or its subsidiaries and assigns and in particular to Spokane Industrial Park Incorporated. Recorded : September 19, 1985 Auditor's No. : 8509190152 FOR: Right of entry and privilege and permit of ingress and egress aver, across and upon the hereinafter described lands and further, permission to connect into the manhole which has been installed by Permitter and is located on Sullivan Road South of the SR 90 /Sullivan Interchange at the intersection of Mission Avenue and Sullivan Road; from date hereof until completion of construction for the purpose of installation of said sewer distribution line within the right of way as now staked upon the ground. AFFECTS: The NW1 /4 of the NW1 /4 of Section 13, and the SW1 /4 of the SW1 /4 of Section 12, all in Twp. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M. NOTES: 1. Aquifer protection fees that may be due and payable in accordance with Chapter 36.36 RC.W. (Specific amounts may be obtained from the County Utility Department, phone #458 - 2538). - 7- This report shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the certificate applied for. No Charge - 8 - TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Spokane County Office By dtA &elf tOk_ Authorized Sigpa; ry) SPOynrv[ COUNTY COURT , OU51. rcv: 12/89 ((?C( ©'L(1. "` -f'r MEMORANDUM BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 'Pa Spokane County County Engineer (No map forwarded) Spokane County Utilities Spokane County Health District Spokane County Department of Building & Safety Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department Fire Protection District #1 Consolidated Irrigation District FROM: Thomas G. Mosher, AICP, Senior Planner DATE: February 16, 1990 SUBJECT: Review of Final PE- 1504 -85 Sullivan Park Center Enclosed find copies of the above referenced final plat. Please review and forward any comments by March 2, 1990. If you have any questions you may contact Paul Jensen at 456 -2205. Please direct your review comments to Paul Jensen. Thank You. kc Enclosure c: R.A. Hansen Properties, Inc., P.O. Box 7400, Spokane, WA. 99207 Clarence E. Simpson Engineers, Inc., N. 909 Argonne Rd., Spokane, WA. 99212 RECEIVED F EB 1 6 1990 County Engineering PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECEIVED FEB 1 - Comb ELgueenas REPORT FOR PLAT CERTIFICATE TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY West 521 First Avenue Spokane, Washington 99204 Telephone: (509) 838 -5281 REPORT FOR PLAT CERTIFICATE Refer to: C- 194497 -KC Re: won Simpson Engineers Attn. Steve Davenport N. 909 Argonne Rd. Spokane, Washington cc' County Engineer cc: County Planning REcev FEB 1 6 1990 SIAM Evi This is a report for plat certificate as of January 9, 1990 at 8:00 a.m. covering the following property: That portion of Sections 11, 13 and 14, Township .25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., described as follows: Begin at the northwest corner of said Section 13; thence South 02 ° 46'23" East, along the West line of saiA Section 13, 60.72 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 69'57'29" East, 81.37 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave t the Northeast with a radius of 40.00 feet and a radial bear of South 87'13'37" West; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 71'06'35", an arc distance of 49.64 feet; thence South 73'52'58" Fast, 384.82 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 1442.00 feet; thence Southeasterly throug a central angle of 12 16'45 ", an arc distance of :309.04:.feetb thence South 28'23'47" West, radial to said curve 92.00 feet; thence South 37'11'15" West, 126.03 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 633.00 feet and a radial }Paring of North 38'25'17" East, said point being on the Northerly right -of -way of the E -NS ramp for Inter 90 (I -90). at Sullivan Road; thence Westerly through a cen angle of 41'10'58" an are distance of 454.98 feet; thence South 87'14'19" West, along said Northerly right - of-way 200.29 feet to the line between said Sections 13 and 14; thence continuing South 87"14'19" West along the Northerly right- of-way of the NS-W ramp for I -90 at Sullivan Road, 1048.61 feet to the Northerly right-of-way of said I -90; theme North 77 ° 54'39" West, along said Northerly line, 216.86 feet; thence North 76 ° 55'02" West, along said Northerly line, 1550.20 feet; theme North 76'10'41" West, along said Northerly line, 620.00 feet; thence North 56 26'27" West, 778.50 feet; thence North 06'28'18" West 950.00feet to a point on a curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6684.56 feet and a radial kraring of South 06 ° 28'18" East, said point being on the Southerly right- of-way of the Union Pacific Railroag; thence Easterly, along said right-of-way, throug3 a central angle of 11 17'05" an arc distance of 1316.56 feet; thence North 72 14'37" East, along said right- of-way 551.72 feet to a point on a curve concave to Northeast with a radius of 964.95 feet and a radial bearing of South 53'51'00" West, said point being on the southwesterly line of the State Parks Departs nt Property as shown on Record of Survey filed in Survey Book 41, page 84; the next six courses are of along said southwesterly line, thence southeasterly through a central angle 28'38 ", an arc distance of 159.61 feet; thence south 45'37'38" East, 912.03 - 1- feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 2874.80 feet; thence southeasterly through a central angle of 11 ° 48'30 ", an arc di of 592.48 feet; thence South 57 26'08" East 588.09 feet; thence South 32'33'52" West, 10.00 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave to th Northeast with radius of 5749.58 feet and a radial bearing of South 32'33'52" West; thence southeasterly through a central angle of 5 ° 59'36 ", an are distance of 601.43 feet to the westerly right-of-way of Sullivan Road; thence South 03 ° 2 4 '03" East, along said Westerly right -of -way, 164.40 feet; thence South 02 46'23" East, along said Westerly right -of -way, 37.28 feet; thence South 69 ° 57'29" East, 59.67 feet to the True Point of Beginning: Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington; EXCEPT State Highway right -of -way. Record Title is vested in R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., a corporation, as to a strip of lard 60 feet wide, being 30 feet upon each side, of the center of the Coeur d'Alene and Spokane Railway Company railway line, as granted by deeds, Volume 143, Page 251, and Volume 143, page 272; and Whitworth . Foundation, a non -profit corporation, as to the remainder. SUBJECT TO: 1. Lien of real estate excise sales tax upon any sale of said premises, if unpaid. 2. General taxes for 1990, paid until February 15, (Assessor's Parcel No. 45113.9026; 45114.9031; in the sine of $(not yet available), which cannot be 1990. 11543 -9026; 11544 -9031; 13542 -9040; 14541- 9170(old), 45132.9040; 45141.9170(new), Code 140) Said taxes affect: Section 11, TWp. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., as to portion of SW1 /4 lying South of SIRR R/W rd Nly of PSH #2, subject to easement; Section 11, Twp. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., as to portion of Gov't Lots 6 -10 and 11 lying Sly of SIRR R/W and Sally of Sally line of Inland Empire Paper Company R/W and Nly of PSH #2 subject to easement; Section 13, Twp. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., portion of Gov't Lots 3 and 4 described as follows: Beginning at intersection of South line of Inlang Empire Paper Co. RY R/W and North line of Burlington Northern RY, thence N.61 02'04" West to North line of NW1 /4 thence west to east line of Sullivan Road, thence Sly along said East line to Nly line of PSH No.2, thence SEly along said Nly line to south line of Gov't Lot 3, thence East along said south line to SE corner of said Gov't Lot 3, thence North to Nly line of Burlington Northern RY R/W, thence Wly along said Nly line to point of beginning except RR R/W; Section 14, Twp. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., portion of NE1 /4 North of PSH #2. The real estate under search is assessed with other lards. The proposed segregation may require short platting pursuant to Spokane County Short Plat Ordinance. Inquiry be made to the Spokane County Planning Department for compliance. - 2- 3. Irrigation assessment of $(not yet available), by Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19, for 1990. The first half will be delinquent April 30th. The last half will be delinquent October 31st, if unpaid. 4. Inquiry for any charges for irrigation, domestic water, electricity or other Charges made N by Consolidated Irrigation D phone 9#19365h�d be made to said • 5. Unrecorded Contract of Sale, constructive notice or riiqrlosurel of which is given by recital in instrument herein set forth. Disclosed by : Notice of Real Estate Contract Instrument Dated: Nay 31, 1978 Recorded : June 15, 1978 Auditor's No. : 7806150379 Contract Dated : Nay 31, 1978 Vendor Whitworth Foundation, a non -profit corporation Vendee : R.A. Hanson and Company, Inc., a corporation Affects : Said premises and other property 6. Decree of Appropriation filed February 5, 1986, in Spokane County Superior Court Cause Nos. 84202146 -7 and 84202145 -9, wherein the State of Washington appropriated portions of the Northeast quarter of Section 14, Government Lots 3 and 4 of the South half of the North half of Section 13, and the South half of Section 11 for Interstate 90. Said Decree states, in part, as follows: "TOGETHER WITH all rights of ingress and egress, if any (including all existing future or potential easements of access, light, view and air) to, fnxn, and between said SR 90 and the remainder of Tract "X". EXCEPT that there shalltbreasonable ingress and egress to e' to, from and between said Tract "X" and the'Sullivan Road Line Survey of said SR 90 Northerly .of HES 50+92.16 Lt. and HES 50+63.83 Rt. TOGETHER WITH the right to enter upon the respondents remaining lards, where necessary, to remove _improvements, if any, located wholly or partially upon the right of way." 7. Effect of Relocation Agreement Dated : December 6, 1989 Recorded : December 13, 1989 Auditor's No. : 8912130174 By and Between: The United States of America, AND, The Consolidated Irrigation District, AND, The R.A. Hanson ard.Canpany 8. Provisions contained in Order Including Lards and Redefining Boundaries of the Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19, regarding R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., recorded February 15, 1989, under auditor's file No. 8902150286. - 3- 9. A perpetual easement for one or more electric power transmission lines granted to the United States of America, together with the right to clear said lard and to keep same clear of bnish, timber, structures, and fire hazards. Width 100 feet Recorded : June 8, 1959 Auditor's No. : 6297118 Affects : Government Lots 6 and 11, said Section 11, and that part of the North 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4, the South 1/2 of the NE1 /4 of the NE1 /4 and the East 300 feet of the NW1 /4 of the NE1 /4 of Section 14. 10. Easement for pipeline for the transportation of oil, gas and the products thereof wherein the grantee agrees not to build, create or construct or to permit to be built, created or constructed; any obstruction, building, engineering works, or other structures over or that would interfere with said pipeline. In Favor of : The Washington Water Pacer Company, a corporation Recorded : January 8, 1962 Auditor's No. : 831986B • Affects : *see below * AFFECTS- That portion of Sections 11 and 14, lying Sly of the Sly right of way line of Spokane, Coeur d'Alene and Palouse Railroad (Great Northern) and Nly of Primary State Highway No. 2, as now located. A'15 foot permanent easement on the South 15 feet of said tract adjacent to the North line of the Freeway (PSH No. 2), the center line of the gas line to be 7 1/2 feet North of the edge of the Freeway right of way and installed with minimum cover of 48 inches. Minimum pipe cover 48 inches. 11. Easement for pipeline for the transportation of oil, gas and the products. thereof wherein the grantee -agrees not to build, . create or construct or to permit to be built, created or constructed any obstruction, building, • engineering works, or other structures over or that would interfere with said pipeline. In Favor of : The United States of America Recorded : June 22, 1965 Auditor's No. : 118205C Affects : portion of said premises and other property - 4 - This report shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the certificate applied for. No Charge - 8 - TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Spokane County Office 12. An easement affect purposes stated For In Favor of Recorded Auditor's No. Affects * AFFECTS: That portion of the South half of Section 11, lying North of Primary State Highway No. 90 ard'that portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM lying North of Primary State Highway No. 90- Line to be located within a strip of land lying 10 feet right and 10 feet left of the following described line: Beginning at a point which lies 752 feet North of the South line and 187 feet East of Vhe West line of Section 11, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM; thence South 73 East paralleling the North right of way ling of Primary State Highway No. 90; a distance of 3255 feet, thence South 80 00' East 210 feet to a point 45 feet west of the east line og the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 14, thence North 3'12'40" West 1880 feet more or less to the 1987.2 feet contour line, North of the Spokane River and other property. 13. An easement herein, and For In Favor of Recorded Affects • irg the portion of said premises ryl a for the herein, and incidental purposes. The right, privilege and authority to install, reinstall, construct, erect, alter, repair, energize, operate and maintain electric underground transmission and distribution facilities, consisting of vaults, manholes, harxdholes, ducts, conduits, cables, wires and other necessary or convenient appurtenances; also the right, privilege, and authority to install, reinstall, construct, erect, alter, repair, energize, operate and maintain at ground • level, electric transforms units, electric junction cabinets and/or::containers, together with appurtenances necessary or convenient to . make said underground and surface installations an integrated electric system and in connection with all the foregoing to cut, trim, or chemically treat trees and shrubbery,' to chip and spread branches and other foliage and to pile and stack logs as necessary alongside the cleared right-of-way in accordance with REA specifications, to the extent necessary to install and maintain said electric system. Inland lower & Light Co., a Washington corporation July 28, 1972 640587C *see below affecting the portion of said premises and for the purposes stated incidental purposes : the right to erect and maintain poles with the necessary wires and fixtures thereon, and to keep same free from foliage. : Pacific States Telephone and Telegraph Company : In Volume 165 of Deeds, Page 305 : The Southeast quarter of Section 11 - 5 - NOTE: The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. has sued to rights granted • by this easement. 14. An easement herein, and For - In Favor of Recorded Affects 15. An easement herein, and For In Favor of Dated Recorded Affects affecting the portion of said premises and for the purposes stated incidental purposes. : Transmission power line Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad Company, a corporation : In Volume 344 of Deeds, Page 371 : The NE 1/4 of the NE1 /4 of Section 14. affecting the portion of said premises and for thejpurposes stated incidental purposes. : The Sullivan Road, County Road Project No. 116. : Spokane County : October 29, 1948. : In Volume 578 of Deeds, Page 370 : The East 30 feet of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, the East 30 feet of the SE1 /4 of. Section 11 16. A perpetual easement for one or more electric power transmission lines granted to the United States of America, together with the right to clear said lard and to keep same clear of brush, timber, structures; and fire hazards. Width : 150 feet Recorded : November 1, 1948 Auditor's No. : 847007A Affects : the South 1/2 of Section 11 17. Easement for pipeline for the transportation of oil, gas and the products thereof wherein the grantee agrees not to build, create or construct or to permit to be built, created or constructed any obstruction, building, engineering works, or other structures over or that would interfere with said pipeline. In Favor of : The Washington Water Power Cwnpany Recorded : May 10, 1985 Auditor's No. : 8505100167 Affects : A 20 ft. strip of lard, Nly of and running parallel with and adjoining Washington State Highway SR -90, in the NW1 /4 of the NE1 /4 and the NE1 /4 of the NE1 /4, In Section 14. 18. Bill of Sale recorded December 27, 1940, under Auditor's File No. 472498A, between Inland Empire Paper Company, a corporation and the Washington Water Power Company, a corporation, for all of the electrical distribution lines of the first party located in Sections 12 and 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., in Spokane County, Washington; also all easements, right of ways, permits, privileges, and franchises and other licenses, contracts, and rights for or relating to the construction, maintenance and operation of said electrical distribution lines. - 6- 19. An easement affecting the portion of said premises and for the purposes stated herein, and incidental purposes. For : the right to reconstruct and maintain electrical distribu- tion lines. In Favor of : The Washington Water Power Company, a corporation Recorded • December 27, 1940 Auditor's No. : 472499A Affects : Lots 3 and 4 in the NW1 /4 of Section 13, Twp. 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M. 20. An easement affecting the portion of said premises and for thejpurposes stated herein, and incidental purposes. For : a perpetual easement for use as a public road In Favor of : Spokane County Recorded : January 21, 1949 Auditor's No. : 859802A Affects : *see belay *AFFECTS: a strip of land 30 feet wide on each side of and parallel with the center line of Sullivan Road, and the West 30 feet of that portion of the northwest quarter of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., that lies North of the Spokane Valley Irrigation District canal. 21. Relinquishment of right of arrpgs to state highway and of light, view and air, under terms of Deed to the State of Washington. Recorded : September 28, 1955 Auditor's No. : 344727B Affects : Lots 3 and 4, Section 13 22. Right of Entry Executed By In Favor Of Recorded Auditor's No. NOTES: : Hanson Properties, Inc. : The Washington Water Power Company, and/or its subsidiaries and assigns and in particular to Spokane Industrial Park Incorporated. : September 19, 1985 :.8509190152. FOR: Right of entry and privilege and permit of ingress and egress over, across and upon the hereinafter described lards and further, permission to connect into the manhole which has been installed by Permitter and is located on Sullivan Road South of the SR 90 /Sullivan Interchange at the intersection of Mission Avenue and Sullivan Road, from date hereof until completion of construction for the purpose of installation of said sewer distribution line within the right of way as now staked upon the ground. AFFECTS: The NW1 /4 of the NW1 /4 of Section 13, and the SW1 /4 of the SW1 /4 of Section 12, all in Twp. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M. 1. Aquifer protection fees that may be due and payable in accordance with Chapter 36.36 RCW. (Specific amounts may be obtained from the County Utility Department, phone #458 - 2538). - 7 - MAR 14 '90 08:46 S I t 'SON' ENG`.' FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION -.._T .__ - .._._._ Founded 1946 6impson Engineers, Inc. Civil Engineering. Land Surveying - & Land Planning Date .. 3 � l o ` T ime 40 No of pages easV02 'F I '. To o.S&AAY s iµs From kk%Ka Pkit M a . . 1 NA, Aa *A. k+Vc /lam or Suu_1.v1bs.3 C.. . %gest Reh;t ..1 A+s I J i- ; . I fie- Yau 4.0441-latas. , Clarence E Simpson Engineers, Inc. (509) 926 -1322 N 909 Argonne Road Spokane WA 99212 -2789 - Fax (509) 926 -1323 MAR 14 '90 08:46 S I t 'SON' ENG`.' MAR 14 '90 08:47 SIMPSON ENG. '11■ . 0 212 P02 RIGHT OF WAY DESCRIPTION INDIANA AVENUE - WEST OF SULLIVAN PARK CENTER , A strip of land over . a portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 11 and the SE 1/4 of Section 10, T.25 N., R.44 E.W.N., the centerline of which is described as follows: Begin at the NE corner of Section 14, T.25 N., R.44 E.W.M; thence S 02 46'23"E, along the East line of said Section, 140.61 feet to . the centerline of proposed Indiana Avenue;/ thence N 81 ° 15'36 "W 692.40 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 955.00 feet; thence . Northwesterly through a central angle of 57`15'36" an arc distance of 954.40 feet; thence N 24 ° 00'00 "W 220.00 feet to the beginning of a curve concave t�, the Southwest with a radius of 955.00.feet; thence Northwesterly through a central angle of 29 ° 07'01 ", an arc distance of 485.32; thence N 53 ° 07'01 "W 334.35 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 1500.00 feet; .thence Northwesterly through a central angle of 50 ° 13'37 ", an arc dist- ance of 1314.94 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6731.56 feet; thence Westerly a central angle of 06 ° 52'20 ", an arc distance of 807.40 feet to the True Point of Beginning at which the right of way North of the centerline is 47.00 feet and South of the centerline is 37.00 feet, said point being the Westerly line of the proposed plat of- Sullivan Park Center; thence continuing Westerly, along said curve, through a central angle of 2 ° 39'55 ", an arc distance of 313.14 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the Southeast with a radius of 1500.00 feet, at said point the right f of way North of the centerline changes from 47.00 feet to 37.00 feet; thence Southwesterly through a central angle of 20 ° 09'40 ", an are distance of 527.82 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 1500.00 feet; thence Southwesterly through a central angle of 21 ° 20'29 ", an arc distance of 558.72 feet to a point 47.00 feet North of the South line of the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 10, at said'point the right of way South of the centerline changes from 37.00 feet to 47.00 feet; thence S 87 ° 22'26 "W, parallel with said South line 2188.94 feet to the East line of Shannon Avenue (No.280) and the end of said described centerline. The side line of said described right of way to be extended or shortened to meet said East line. 1 I a WI Washington State • Department of Transportation District 6 North 2714 Mayfair Street PO. Box 5299 North Central Station Spokane, Washington 99205-0299 (509) 456-3000 Ron Hormann Spokane County Engineers North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Mr. Hormann: JRB:db JFP April 20, 1990 Re: SR 90, Sullivan Road Interchange Modification Very truly yours, JAMES R. BUSS, P.E. District Administrator By: JOHN F. PIERSON District R/W Supervisor Duane Berentson Secretary of Transportation Please be advised that the District has reviewed and approved the Quitclaim Deed for conveyance to the Department. The deeds have been forwarded to Headquarters for signature. mr.isiurrna+ klyt j. 0 ;i'l Su Tri i li'a 6 t el t • ..., '... Int • 1 . °a ' $1.4' Lfs— fi c e a r t c h o an rt ga n elSt ., ,V . , 1 11t 4 4-10 4: -ic," ,-..-• - tl'..e"'-'` ' , . • J:leat014 F ' --7 . 'r* '.-•' i •'' - -.. V ' f H ormanni:it.r.,,iii-,.ko...*.r.„1....$0:.r..4-, : ..," 4, t r -4 . 1 1 a ). 1tr.: .4, , . P lea s epti'dpa ditsed thatacitrl ct. ha s'.• 1' ewe n'd I. a pprovech;the-tiQu? t 0 ,,Cid'i m A .,...„..,....,,,„,_,_ •,,-, .7-, b 1/4-fs _ •_,,-. ,-- , dr1;conveyaricOtoitheaDepai-tmentr:t.Thei,deeds' quarersfo IleadtArms1;gna , ture;:itt. - --,.. ' 44,-4,,, .. ,. .. , .. 44 ...,...„...,...-)s, 40..-..,, t ' 1 11 3.1 i iNi* ( i ' IL L ic;:,.tP C AMPA24q : SS , * I fie.,.. 41 '.cr j /t .4* 1 ": i'l . I ‘1 6 Jt-4.-‘qt.tc.faa ', "rr".'' .7.rrAt.r. r•Viiika)g,t4fe ?..... i 1 ••'.0.5: - e tyt rti 1 y .yo u f• s , rt.:. ;...., . - IT 11-s ! ,...9,,, ' „.. f.: / 4, A.-44' [;;,+:-.-! • • • r. ("?- ti 1ST 4-. k 0 1 4 ;.fy iSal" . • ft j,s-try, rt.J%-ek.e i . • - • • in :0 -r.JAMES"-iRri'l-BOSS ; P P.,Ditrict,Administrator : 4. 4 x. BY:T.:'...410HN E' . P I E Ft N Di sti9 ct 1/W:SupervidOi • • t • r . , • , 3 3 4 • • ; • ••• • DEVELOPER AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this 6th day of April, 1990, by and between R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer" and SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at W. 1116 Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as the "County ", jointly referred to as the "Parties ", W I T N E S S E T E I : WHEREAS, Developer received preliminary plat approval from the County for Sullivan Park Center, PE- 1504 -85, ZE- 180 -78, on March 25, 1986, and WHEREAS, Developer wishes to obtain approval of Final Plat from the County, and WHEREAS, the County has required, as a Condition of Approval of Final Plat, that Developer construct certain improvements in the form of roads, drainage swales, landscaping, sprinkler system, and lighting, all pursuant to that certain Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Planning Report dated October 25, 1985, and WHEREAS, it is required that Developer post a bond or provide other security for the construction of said improvements before the Final Plat will be approved, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the covenants made hereinafter and the mutual benefits to be derived by the Parties hereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. Upon execution of this Agreement, Developer shall grant a deed of trust to County of all the property contained within the proposed Final Plat. The grant of said deed of trust to County shall be made for the purposes of pledging said real estate to County as security for the full performance by Developer of the construction of those improvements required in the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Planning Report Conditions of Approval dated October 24, 1985. It is acknowledged and understood between the parties hereto that Developer intends to sell approximately 82 acres of the property contained within the Final Plat to Price Development Company, a Utah corporation, within fifteen (15) days of the filing of the Final Plat. Developer is to receive a cash sum of money from Price Development Company as and for the purchase of said property. It is agreed between Developer and County that at such time that Developer receives cash proceeds from the sale to Price Development Company, then Developer may, at Developer's option, deposit $1,906,470.00 into a savings certificate and /or bank savings account as security for the cost of the construction of roads, drainage swales, landscaping, lighting and sprinkler system as required in the aforementioned Conditions of Approval. In the alternative, Developer may obtain a bond or letter of credit, either of which must be first approved by County, in such amounts as to adequately collateralize Developer's obligations for the aforementioned improvements. At such time as $1,906,470.00 is deposited as set forth above, or when Developer has obtained a bond or letter of credit acceptable to County, then County will reconvey and release its deed of trust in lieu thereof. 2. In the event that Developer chooses to-use the cash sale proceeds as security, then Developer agrees to execute assignment agreements in a form acceptable to the County for the purpose of substituting the cash collateral for the aforementioned deed of trust. Similarly, any bond or letter of credit pledged by Developer, as security for the required improvements, must first be approved by County before County will be required to release its deed of trust. 3. County agrees that Developer shall be entitled to all interest earned on the escrowed funds, which interest shall be paid to Developer at Developer's discretion. County agrees that as the improvements are constructed, County may reduce the amount of the security held by County at the discretion of County. Any discretionary reductions in the amount of security shall be based upon the County Engineer's estimate of costs to complete the improvements required of Developer. 4. The initial amount of $1,906,470.00, which is to secure the performance of Developer, includes $206,470.00, which is the amount that the Spokane County Planning Department has required as security for the construction of landscaping and irrigation in the landscaped median in Indiana Avenue and the two parcels of land which will be deeded to the State of Washington for the Sullivan Road Interchange. The $206,470.00 has been computed by figuring the total square footage of the median in Indiana Avenue -2- (71,250 sq. ft.) at $1.75 per sgare foot, and the square footage in the property to be deeded to the State of Washington (81,780 sq. ft) at $1.00 per square foot. These computations do not make any allowance for turn -out lanes on Indiana Avenue. It is therefore agreed that the total security amount of $1,906,470.00 will be adjusted at such time that the final turn -out lane requirements are determined. It is also agreed and understood that although County will require a bond or other security for all of the landscaping, County will permit Developer to construct only that portion of the landscaped median in Indiana Avenue which lies adjacent to that portion of the Final Plat for Sullivan Park Center which is being sold by Developer to Price Development Company, provided however, that Developer must put the unlandscaped portion of the median into a condition satisfactory to County. At such time that improvements are constructed on other portions of the property covered in the Plat, then the landscaping shall be completed in that portion of Indiana Avenue abutting these properties before occupancy permits for these properties will be issued. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above- written. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE, Clerk of the Board By Deputy Clerk -3- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY By By By Patricia Mummey - Chairman Steven Hasson John McBride DEVELOPER: R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. By (/ 1 • a R.A. Hanson - President CLYDE HAASE LANDSCAPE, INC. RT. 10 BOX 163 SPOKANE. WA 99206 926 -7950 R.A. Hanson Company P.O. Box 7400 Spokane. Wa 99207 RE: ;Landscape Proposal for Medium Strip at Sullivan Park Center LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTING LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE INTERIORSCAPE 4/10/90 Clyde Haase Landscape. Inc. to provide the following landscape services as per the landscape plan drawn C.H.L. dated 4/2/90 and as outlined below: 1. Provide and install the plant material as per plan. 2. Tractor /finish grading. hand raking. Note: the owner is to supply ALL soils needed and to provide rough grading to within 2" of finish grade. 3. Provide and install plant material as per plan. 4. Provide and install sod in lawn areas and hvdroseed fescue areas as per plan. 5. Provide and install 'Edge King' plastic edging as per plan. 6. Provide and install 'Dewitt Pro 5' weed fabric and 2" thick of 314" crush gravel in planting areas as per plan. 7. Provide and install an automatic irrigation system with Toro pop -up heads in grass areas and drip irrigation in planting areas. Note: these prices are for the medium strip that is landscaped /irrigated. NOT COUNTING TURN LANES, HARD SURFACED AREAS. ETC. Bid Price: MEDIUM STRIP - landscaped and irrigated as listed above S1.75 per so. ft. SWALE, LANDSCAPE MEDIAN, SPRINKLER SYSTEM, AND STREET LIGHT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this 6th day of April, 1990, by and between R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation, and WHITWORTH FOUNDATION, INC., a Washington Non - Profit corporation, hereinafter collectively referred to as the "GRANTEE ", and SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY," jointly referred to as the "PARTIES." WHEREAS, Whitworth Foundation, Inc. is the owner of a certain tract of land, known as Sullivan Park Center, being portions of Section 11, 13, and 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M.; and WHEREAS, R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. is purchasing said real estate from Whitworth Foundation, Inc. on a real estate contract, and WHEREAS, the COUNTY has required drainage swales to be constructed on the right -of -way for Indiana Avenue adjacent to and adjoining the GRANTEE'S property in order to handle drainage flow and dispose of run off; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY has required landscaped median including plantings and a sprinkler system to be installed in the traffic islands on Indiana Avenue; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY has required street lights to be constructed within the right -of -way of Indiana Avenue adjacent to and adjoining the GRANTEE'S property; and WHEREAS, the GRANTEE agrees to assume responsibility of operation and maintenance of the drainage swales, landscaped median, sprinkler system, and the street lights on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual promises, and covenants hereafter set forth, the PARTIES agree as follows: I. CONSTRUCTION It is the understanding of the PARTIES that the construction of the drainage swales, landscaped median, sprinkler system, and street lights shall be the responsibility of the Developer, R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. II.•PERMISSION TO PERFORM WORK IN COUNTY ROAD RIGHT OF WAY The COUNTY hereby grants the GRANTEE permission to work on the right -of -way of Indiana Avenue adjacent to Sullivan Park Center for the purposes of operation and maintenance and of the drainage swales, landscaped median, sprinkler systems, and street lights. In consideration of the granting of permission to operate and maintain drainage swales, landscaped median, sprinkler system, and street lights as set forth herein, the GRANTEE agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the COUNTY and all its officers, agents, employees or otherwise, from any and all liability, loss or damage that they may suffer as a result of claims, demands, actions, damages or injuries of every kind or nature whatsoever by or to any and all persons or property or judgments against them which result from, arise out of, or in any way connected with the obligation of the GRANTEE under the terms of this -1- Agreement to construct, operate and maintain the drainage swales, landscaped median, sprinkler system, and street lights. III. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE The GRANTEE, heirs, successors, and assigns shall be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the drainage swales, landscaped median, sprinkler systems, and street lights. The GRANTEE shall maintain the drainage swales with a permanent, live cover of lawn turn and optional shrubbery and /or trees which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage swale as indicated by the grade of adjacent streets. Maintenance work to be performed shall include but not be limited to fertilization, pruning, moving and maintenance and operation of the sprinkler systems and street lights. The GRANTEE, heirs, successors, and assigns shall pay all operation and maintenance costs. IV. WARRANTY The PARTIES understand that the landscaping, sprinkler systems, and street lights will be guaranteed by the installing contractor for a period of 12 (twelve) months from the date of acceptance by the COUNTY wherein the installing contractor will correct any defects without obligation to the PARTIES. Acceptance as used herein is defined as the date of establishment of the road by the Board of County Commissioners. V. RELEASE OF WHITWORTH FOUNDATION, INC. At such time that Whitworth Foundation, Inc. has received payment in full from R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. and has conveyed its interest in the subject property to R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., then Whitworth Foundation, Inc. shall thereafter be released from any and all obligations under the terms of this Agreement, and this Agreement shall be void as to Whitworth Foundation, Inc. THIS Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding on the legal representatives, successors and assigns of the PARTIES. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. R.A. HANSON COMPANY A Washington corporation By R.A. Hanson Title: President ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE Clerk of the Board By Deputy Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM By Chief Civil Deputy -2- WHITWORTH FOUNDATION, INC. A Washington Non - Profit corporation By Title: SPOKANE COUNTY By Chairman, Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF SPOKANE On this day of April, 1990, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared before me R.A. Hanson, known to me to be the President of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SPOKANE ss. NOTARY PUBLIC My Appointment Expires: On this day of April, 1990, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared before me , known to me to be the of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC My Appointment Expires: —3— � FORSGREN ASSOCIATES / I.A. April 6, 1990 Mr. Gary S. Nelson, P.E. Planning Engineer ENGINEERING DIVISION, SPOKANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99260 -0180 IRE: Preliminary Grading Plan Spokane Galleria Shopping Center Dear Mr. Nelson: During the summer of 1989 we met with you relative to our design efforts for the Spokane Galleria shopping center in Sullivan Park. At that time, you provided us with the guidelines for storm water management required for Spokane County. Since that time we have been working with our client, Price Development Company, to obtain different site layout options. We have finally reached the point wherein the site plan is becoming "more firm," and we would like to obtain an informal review from you or your staff if possible. The preliminary grading plan enclosed shows the concept we are currently working under. The mall is two -level and is broken up between Phase I and Phase II. At this time, we are planning on approximately four (4) acres of required 208 pond area. These are placed at two or three different locations depending on the parking area piping system for the storm water and whether the roof water can be percolated "direct" Throughout this process we have met with Mr. Sam Angove of Spokane Parks to obtain his requirements relative to use of the riparian park area across Indiana. To this point he has concurred with the section and treatment shown. The intent of seeking your comments is to assure us that we are proceeding on the right track and that if changes are required by your office, we will be able to adjust accordingly. We will be in town on Monday and Tuesday, April 16 and 17. We understand that we will be able to meet with you at 2:00 p.m. Monday, April 16 to discuss your comments. Our experience has found that meetings such as this will greatly enhance the final design approval process expected this summer. Again, we appreciate your time and look forward to meeting with you. Sincerely, FORSGREN ASSOCIATES, PA. Cott Rhead, P.E. Project Manager cc: Eric Davis w /enclosures previously sent /SD A COMPANY OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS 210 MALLARD DRIVE, SUITE D / BOISE, IDAHO 83706 / (208) 336-5457 REXBURG / BOISE /EVANSTON /CASPER /WEST YELLOWSTONE /SALT LAKE CITY /PHOENIX/ WENATCHEE Co - 9-.N.. ."-tr4-.."), ON—. gel Ve 1 "4_0 01 -� . JA /40,5 cidt4dt , jtej- Gentlemen: S ipn i noh Er Date: C)VI 1Ca !,i• COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER Sanwa-NE ;M osinNGTON 99260 RE: ,Sin /i 1!Ah 44A ( e V D_--/V A review of the road, drainage, and parking plans for the above- refer- enced plat, short plat, binding site plan, and /or building permit has been accomplished. Areas of concern to us are indicated in red on the attached prints. Please make the corrections and resubmit them to this office in order that the review process may proceed. When the plans are resubmitted, mark all changes on the revised print in color. If you have any questions about this review, please contact us at 456 -3600. Thank, you. GSN287:sla Attachment Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Gary S. Nilson, P.E. Planning Engineer cam vin IA J 1:0 y- �,� r. cLecf� �i4fJ n,� 11 p Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3600 RIGHT OF WAY DESCRIPTION INDIANA AVENUE WEST OF SULLIVAN PARK CENTER A strip of land 84.00 feet wide, over that portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 11 and the SE 1/4 of Section 10, T.25 N., R.44 E.W.M., lying 37.00 feet South and 47.00 feet North of the following described centerline: Begin at the NE corner of Section 14, T.25 N., R.44 E.W.M;- thence S 02 ° 46'23 "E, along the East line of said Section, 140.61 feet to the centerline of proposed Indiana Avenue at station 149 +82.62; thence N 81 ° 15'36 "W 692.40 feet to sta. 142 +90.22 and the begin- ning of a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 955.00 feet; thence Northwesterly through a central angle of 57 ° 15'36 ", an are distance of 954.40 feet; thence N 24 ° 00'00 "W 220.00 feet to sta. 131 +15.82 and the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 955.00 feet; thence Northwesterly through a central angle of 29 ° 07'01 ", an arc distance of 485.32; thence N 53 ° 07'01 "W 334.35 feet to sta. 122 +96.15 and the begin- ning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 1500.00 feet; thence Northwesterly through a central angle of 50 ° 13'37 ", an arc distance of 1314.94 feet to the beginning_of a reverse curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6731.56 feet; thence Westerly through a central angle of 06 ° 52'20 ", an arc distance of 807.40 feet to sta. 101 +73.81 and the True Point of Beginning said point being the Westerly line of the proposed plat of Sullivan Park Center; thence continuing Westerly, along said curve, through a central angle of 2 ° 39'55 ", an arc distance of 313.14 feet to sta. 98 +60.67 and the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the Southeast with a radius of 1500.00 feet, at said station the right of way North of the centerline changes' from 47.00 feet to 37.00 feet;. thence Southwesterly through a central angle of 20 ° 09'40 ", an arc distance of 527.82 feet to the begin- ning of a reverse curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 1500.00 feet; thence Southwesterly through a central angle of 21 an arc distance of 558.72 feet to sta. 87 +74.13 where the right of way South of the centerline changes from 37.00 feet to 47.00 feet; thence S 87 ° 22'26 "W 2188.94 feet to the East line of Shannon Avenue (No.280) and the end of said described center- line. The side line of said described right of way to be extended or shortened to meet said East line. 1 A ,fie vP' /Ci :6 (.S C a P Y. to / c e.v.711 r — / - This agreement, dated this day of , 1990 by and between R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. , a Washington Corporation, for itself, its heirs, executors, administrators, successors of assigns, hereinafter called the "DEVELOPER," and SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal corporation in the State of Washington, for the purpose of improving the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Sullivan Road by installation of traffic signal system, which improvement is for the purpose of enhancing access to the Developer's property under the following mutually agreed conditions, tp wit: Spokane County agrees to perform the following: 1. To prepare plans, specifications and estimate of cost for the project and Call for Bids from private contractors to accomplish said work. 2. To enter into a contract with the contractor submitting their lowest and best bid, subject to the approval of the Developer, and the deposit by the Developer of the contract amount, including signal equipment, plus 20% for construction engineering, inspection and contingencies with Spokane County. 3. To pay the contractor amounts due as the work is accomplished. 4. To deduct from the Developer's deposit the total costs and expenses of the project upon the completion thereof, including engineering, administration and associated costs. 5. To refund any balance of the Developer's deposit in excess of the total cost and expense of the improvement, or 6. To bill the Developer for the costs and expenses of the project which exceed the deposit amount, if any. 7. Upon completion of the work to accept the same as part of the County road system and assume maintenance responsibility therefor. The Developer agrees as follows: 1.. To deposit the amount of Eight Thousand and No /100 Dollars ($8,000.00) with Spokane County at the time of execution of this Agreement to initiate preliminary engineering for the project. 2. After bid opening by the County, but prior to award of the contract, to promptly deposit the contract amount, including signal equipment, plus twenty percent (20%) for construction engineering, inspection, contingencies, and associated costs with Spokane County. 3. To pay promptly to the County, as billed, for any and all costs of the project which exceed the deposit amounts. THE PARTIES are here agreed that this is the whole and complete statement of their agreement. APPROVED: Spokane County Engineer Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Deputy Prosecuting Attorney 07110 AGREEMENT DEVELOPER: R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. By: SPOKANE COUNTY By: os. a. Bus.Address: P.0.-Box 7400 Spokane, Washington 99207 Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington ,........... .. . (OUCHER NO. - _ _ i - : - DESCRIPTION- •• -. 7=14' ',VOUCHER NO. :i .- DESCRIPTION Sullivan Eroperty . • _ . ! - • • - .. . ECK NUMBER ' • . . 4.1- .... : 1 1 ,h1 1 .'': . •.: _ '2 -- !.1:nd::..71 -:--,:.--:.i :--- c''''' 11: : !:.::::ii. '-' • 1 •-• ---".-"-- :". ! '1 „ "::!!•FL. .- ■1 :, i!.. . - •1 — i .; - 7 • 1! 7-7 .; .. , ! -C.:.:10:. - -1 L 7. ill::::,:' .11: 'i! _7- .11:= .--- ! --; -- i • -- 0 ---... 1! - 1 f 265 .l74 . 444 , • '' _ . . I 1 -: t, • _:!•. , Ii: l iz: , *--!"- - -; 1 1!!!- - -.1..- '!1 [1::: — i,j•-..--‘ i ---...p....... pi.t=fill"."=;;17_::, I ---= ' -...Z•. :" , it j —H• --- 01 -- : --- .• --- 01.--,;!.t. -ITOTALS T ill ..... ....'....,14; ''''; i ..: • 8;000.00: - ' ;';-:. --;':-- h .1:1 .:-.:.:!■:••-, • It ''.• - . 1-- i :(;.....--•„- .-! !...-.; ', C.::: i - : ..7.. =.11 P- .: t:' ijy:t7: ••:-..: i . !!,' 1 . GROSS AMOUNT r7r4iir'8 000 ., _ , .-... , . Ti!---...,{ :::■ i•---• .iint - _ :_:.;!'. _ ' • " it - r . . 1: ... tr ,.. ! _ ii..„_:._.• -- - -- -_ - n-- . ..1! ! !:. j, --.-j,•:,ift ,••- = , • iii n yo, :t t.,! -- I! - till . -- - -. 1,::r :::::10,:r....lii:-7 •--J;;-..:I•i---.:,---, t.L 0 ::. t i I . - 7.:: ! !..7"...' 11:27. ir 1 .:_.: 2 .: 11.,: 111. I •!. 4. DISCOUNTS ,L :.1.'......;* NET ANIOUNT.:..... , . ,- - . ---- . - 1 .11?-z;.1 1 ., - - - 00.::.:,: F1'in=tlil8;00000-- , . . . . • 'flPFRtIFS ' INC • - • po Box7310 Sookane WA99207 USA - - • ' •, ...! HT , H.,•...:• • JT , ..DETACHBEFORE DEPOSIT INGiCHECK,1• :!!!n .__ ,,,,,_.,,__,!,,,.....! - I ' .7. t ! :".. • . 7.".7-. 11 i .::::: 1 "CZ- Mt 1 --- 117.-7:: t ! ::::' 11 -E-.111 ----- I' - . -:- :-L- : / ... ip: --- VI ..n- il ----- lit --- !I; -- ',.. '! — of --- ! • --- 4 !!: - ..t. • :7:: $: '7 :. 7.:Z.; !II T-7_1; • -- , t :1 1 %I. 1 L- - t ‘ i li .:.!! :!,.,--.-- •: :-::!--• ---- il --- III - --,.■ r---!, 1,..—.1it --. .1 .:--- .! - .-1.7! •: , 7 C 7 17 - " L •1 !: ‘...• . , . '!' '.....i 4 , - . ! -;.,... , •••• , • • ! ,..,,. _,lit ri !!'-1';— !!,__1•!;: , :::-.- H.::: !:=7::!1=iii CI - ---_-_, , ----• • ..._ I "": •- - r! •,•--,.) • ! IF= it. jo,pinp,rp-ricq 41=1 1 -1L - i: P F ST NATIONAL. BANK • S k LY. - II - I - F!.0: Box 7310,-,Spokane; WA 99207, U.S.A. • ----J!!'•-c2 Eighd' _ .Titbitgan i-Do liar sTarid: Ai HANSON - PAY TO Ei _ !Pin : THE 6R6ERIOF-= 1 1 1 1= 7 ;i:- - _ • 1 11 -- :."Cotixity r ITre4Suret5 Ip :..r.t.: ;It= ..... 11,r2r1;17:... li :....r i i,Frrii f........„!,--., r . 4 •' • r 4 44 # rt 'ErirEngilleer 1 = tiS:..Officei,--E.: 1 _ pi .!.. .. ,,.-,..,•., .,!.•,-,-. ; - a■: li...7.1i •t. i..! ' if83:1 ffeisoii !„--,-.,,,, 7:.;.• l• .......1•C 1, ! • ! -• I. ,,,,, r r Spokane - - NI:W/tin99 . 260 --.: II :I: — I Irz- --- ' 1 -113 1 z- - — litt ---; i --- IIIIIL--11„ ---17-7 lit I ---:. . =I; ---- --p -, e.-:-111:-.-,,--HANSO PROPERTIES.I.IN Ail :-.••••--- !i' =•:' • . 0 -(yLt-A 0 0 IS\r- • - 8,East - e - h - Braicch - S `Okine WA •• !' r719 • • , • --- 1.4 Celled I X; ! . CHECK DATE I CHECK NO: :•'•!- AMOUNT ' 't :1 1: tr iln = "1 ill 41-/../ air, ., i WW1 ti o vro i.• OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. liormann, P.E., County Engineer DATE: TO: ATTENTION: CITY /STATE: FAX NUMBER: FROM: COUNTY FAX NO.: N 811 Jul fersen MFSSAGE /SPECIAL INSTRUCTION: <5 2d -7/ A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director FACSIMILE COVER SHEET (0 -oat l - NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): (509) 456 -4715 Please contact at (509) 456 -3600, should any problems occur with transmission or receipt of facsimile. Spokane, WA 99260 -0180 (509) 456 -3600 FAX (509) 456 -4715 kr-4 ` AGREEMENT This agreement, dated this day of , by and between , a Washington Corporation, for itself, its heirs, executors, administrators, successors of assigns, hereinafter called the "DEVELOPER," and SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal corporation in the State of Washington, for the purpose of improving the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Sullivan Road by installation of traffic signal system ..and- .• , which improvements are for the purpose of enhancing access to Developer's property under the following mutually agreed conditions, to wit: Spokane County agrees to perform the following: 1. To prepare plans, specifications and estimate of cost for the project and Call for Bids from private contractors to accomplish said work. 2. To enter into a contract with the contractor submitting their lowest and best bid, subject to the approval of the Developer, and the deposit by the Developer of the contract amount, including signal equipment, plus 20% for construction engineering, inspection and contingencies with Spokane County. 3. To pay the contractor amounts due as the work is accomplished. 4. To deduct from the Developer's deposit the total costs and expenses of the project upon the completion thereof, including engineering, administration and associated costs. 5. To refund any balance of the Developer's deposit in excess of the total cost and expense of the improvement, or 6. To bill the Developer for the costs and expenses of the project which exceed the deposit amount, if any. 7. Upon completion of the work to accept the same as part of the County road system and assume maintenance responsibility therefor. The Developer agrees as follows: 1. To deposit the amount of Eight Thousand and No /100 Dollars ($8,000.00) with Spokane County at the time of execution of this Agreement to initiate preliminary engineering for the project. 2. After bid opening by the County, but prior to award of the contract, to promptly deposit the contract amount, including signal equipment, plus twenty percent (20 %) for construction engineering, inspection, contingencies, and associated costs with Spokane County. 3. To pay promptly to the County, as billed, for any and all costs of the project which exceed the deposit amounts. THE PARTIES are here agreed that this is the whole and complete statement of their agreement. APPROVED: DEVELOPER: 07110 By: Spokane County Engineer Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Bus.Address: SPOKANE COUNTY By: Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington AGREEMENT This agreement, dated this day of , by and between , a Washington Corporation, for itself, its heirs, executors, administrators, successors of assigns, hereinafter called the "DEVELOPER," and SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal corporation in the State of Washington, for the purpose of improving the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Sullivan Road by installation of traffic signal system, which improvement is for the purpose of enhancing access to the Developer's property under the following mutually agreed conditions, to wit: Spokane County agrees to perform the following: 1. To prepare plans, specifications and estimate of cost for the project and Call for Bids from private contractors to accomplish said work. 2. To enter into a contract with the contractor submitting their lowest and best bid, subject to the approval of the Developer, and the deposit by the Developer of the contract amount, including signal equipment, plus 20% for construction engineering, inspection and contingencies with Spokane County. 3. To pay the contractor amounts due as the work is accomplished. 4. To deduct from the Developer's deposit the total costs and expenses of the project upon the completion thereof, including engineering, administration and associated costs. 5. To refund any balance of the Developer's deposit in excess of the total cost and expense of the improvement, or 6. To bill the Developer for the costs and expenses of the project which exceed the deposit amount, if any. 7. Upon completion of the work to accept the same as part of the County road system and assume maintenance responsibility therefor. The Developer agrees as follows: 1. To deposit the amount of Eight Thousand and No /100 Dollars ($8,000.00) with Spokane County at the time of execution of this Agreement to initiate preliminary engineering for the project. 2. After bid opening by the County, but prior to award of the contract, to promptly deposit the contract amount, including signal equipment, plus twenty percent (20 %) for construction engineering, inspection, contingencies, and , associated costs with Spokane County. 3. To pay promptly to the County, as billed, for any and all costs of the project which exceed the deposit amounts. THE PARTIES are here agreed that this is the whole and complete statement of their agreement. APPROVED: DEVELOPER: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Deputy Prosecuting Attorney 07110 By: Spokane County Engineer Title: Bus.Address: SPOKANE COUNTY By: Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington The Developer agrees as follows: AGREEMENT This agreement, dated this day of , by and between , a Washington Corporation, for itself, its heirs, executors, administrators, successors of assigns, hereinafter called the "DEVELOPER," and SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal corporation in the State of Washington, for the purpose of improving the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Sullivan Road by installation of traffic signal system, which improvement is for the purpose of enhancing access to the Developer's property under the following mutually agreed conditions, to wit: Spokane County agrees to perform the following: 1. To prepare plans, specifications and estimate of cost for the project and Call for Bids from private contractors to accomplish said work. 2. To enter into a contract with the contractor submitting their lowest and best bid, subject to the approval of the Developer, and the deposit by the Developer of the contract amount, including signal equipment, plus 20% for construction engineering, inspection and contingencies with Spokane County. 3. To pay the contractor amounts due as the work is accomplished. 4. To deduct from the Developer's deposit the total costs and expenses of the project upon the completion thereof, including engineering, administration and associated costs. 5. To refund any balance of the Developer's deposit in excess of the total cost and expense of the improvement, or 6. To bill the Developer for the costs and expenses of the project which exceed the deposit amount, if any. 7. Upon completion of the work to accept the same as part of the County road system and assume maintenance responsibility therefor. 1. To deposit the amount of Eight Thousand and No /100 Dollars ($8,000.00) with Spokane County at the time of execution of this Agreement to initiate preliminary engineering for the project. 2. After bid opening by the County, but prior to award of the contract, to promptly deposit the contract amount, including signal equipment, plus twenty percent (20 %) for construction engineering, inspection, contingencies, and associated costs with Spokane County. 3. To pay promptly to the County, as billed, for any and all costs of the project which exceed the deposit amounts. THE PARTIES are here agreed that this is the whole and complete statement of their agreement. APPROVED: DEVELOPER: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 07110 Spokane County Engineer Title: Deputy Prosecuting Attorney By: Bus.Address: SPOKANE COUNTY By: Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington SPOKANE COUNTY CC T HOUSE_ Mr. Drew Bodker, Attorney -at -Law South 1401 Grand Blvd, Suite 203N Spokane, WA 99203 Dear Sir: GSN /set 0083p J. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 January 5, 1990 irCAk CJ€,- Enclosed is the agreement for the improvement of the Indiana Avenue and Sullivan Road intersection by installation of a traffic signal system. Please return it to this office for submittal to the Board of County Commissioners. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Gary S. Nelson, P.E. / Planning Engineer Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 This between its heirs, executors, the "DEVELOPER," and SPOKANE COUNTY, a Washington, for the purpose of improving Sullivan Road by installation of traffic the purpose of enhancing access to mutually agreed conditions, to wit: agreement, dated Spokane County agrees to perform the following: 1. To prepare plans, specifications and estimate of cost for the project and Call for Bids from private contractors to accomplish said work. 2. To enter into a contract with the contractor submitting their lowest and best bid, subject to the approval of the Developer, and the deposit by the Developer of the contract amount, including signal equipment, plus 20% for construction engineering, inspection and contingencies with Spokane County. 3. To pay the contractor amounts due as the work is accomplished. 4. To deduct from the Developer's deposit the total costs and expenses of the project upon the completion thereof, including engineering, administration and associated costs. 5. To refund any balance of the Developer's deposit in excess of the total cost and expense of the improvement, or 6. To bill the Developer for the costs and expenses of the project which exceed the deposit amount, if any. 7. Upon completion of the work to accept the same as part of the County road system and assume maintenance responsibility therefor. The Developer agrees as follows: 1. To deposit the amount of Eight Thousand and No /100 Dollars ($8,000.00) with Spokane County at the time of execution of this Agreement to initiate preliminary engineering for the project. 2. After bid opening by the County, but prior to award o the contract, to promptly deposit the contract amount, including signal equipment, plus twenty percent (20%) for construction engineering, inspection, contingencies, and associated costs with Spokane County. 3. To pay promptly to the County, as billed, for any and all costs of the project which exceed the deposit amounts. THE PARTIES are here agreed that this is the whole and complete statement of their agreement. APPROVED: DEVELOPER: 07110 Spokane County Engineer APPROVED AS TO FORM: Deputy Prosecuting Attorney this administrators, AGREEMENT the day of , by and , a Washington Corporation, for itself, successors of assigns, hereinafter called municipal corporation in the State of the intersection of Indiana Avenue and signal system, which improvement is for Developer's property under the following By: Title: Bus.Address: SPOKANE COUNTY By: Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington SPOKANE CODU1Y COURT HOUSE January 3, 1990 Price Development Co. 35 Century Park -Way Salt Lake City, Utah 84115 Attn: Eric Davis Re: Spokane Mall Sullivan Road /I -90 Spokane, Washington Dear Mr. Davis l -- 1P ➢;i,(4 e7NrIlhq C IDIC 1:17hr PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 We have reviewed your December 20th, 1989 letter regarding the Spokane Mall to be constructed at Sullivan and I -90. We are in general agreement with the concepts included in your letter, but we offer the following comments for your consideration: 1. It will probably be necessary to pipe the storm drainage to the park property from the Mall property. The 208 swales are normally only 8 inches in depth. The park property is generally at the same elevation as the Mall property. Due to the relative elevations of the properties, it may be difficult to obtain this 8 inch depth when the pipes are much deeper than 8 inches. This has been a problem in the past, and we offer it for your consideration. 2. We assume you mean Spokane County standard drywells when you refer to "percolation sumps" in your letter. 3. We have been reviewing plans from Simpson Engineers regarding the storm drainage and associated 208 design for Indiana Avenue. These calculations have not included any drainage from the Mall property. We suggest that your designer coordinate his design with Simpson's design if you propose to locate the ponds "contiguous to Indiana" (your words). Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 Li 4. We note that item 4 of your letter indicates that "the shape and the grades of the ponds will be determined in final design in the most cost effective manner." We assume this includes item 1 of the same letter, meaning "and in conformance with Spokane County Guidelines for Storm Water Management." Again, these comments are intended to clarify and no way contradict your letter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. cc Simpson Engineers Very truly Yours T ‘ � 4 Gary S/ Nelson P.E. Planning Engineer PRICE DEVE._JPMENT COMPANY SHOPPING CENTERS: INDUSTRIAL AND OFFICE PROPERTIES 35 CENTURY PARK-WAY-SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84115 Mr. Albert D. "Sam" Angove Parks & Recreation Director Spokane County Department of Park & Recreation West 1115 Broadway Spokane, Washington 99260 Mr. Gary S. N- on, P. E. Engineeri.. Division Spoka - County Public Works No 811 Jefferson Street okane, Washington 99260 -0180 RE: Spokane Mall Sullivan Road /I -90 Spokane, Washington Dear Mr. Nelson and Mr. Angove: December 20, 1989 TELEPHONE (801) 486 -3911 TELECOPIERJFAX (801) 48 8-7653 The proposed plat being submitted by Hanson Properties, Inc. for the above referenced project will dedicate an area north of Indiana Avenue and south of the Spokane River to Spokane County for use as a Riparian Park. Our land use planning to date has, in part, relied upon the Sullivan Park Center Master Plan For Development dated September, 1985 which, among other things, allows portions of the Riparian Park to serve as a detention pond or ponds. Our discussions with County Officials have confirmed that Price Development Company may utilize the park to satisfy our 208 storm 11� water runoff obligation given Spokane County standards are met. Therefore, to establish an understanding, upon which we can base further design direction, we offer the following: 1) All 208 design on the mall site and in the Park will be done in accordance with Spokane County Guidelines For Storm Water Management as prepared by the County Engineer's office. 2) The pond area both on the mall site and in the Park will be determined by site size, landscaping area and roof top area analysis, etc. 3) Run -off in excess of one- half_(1 /2 ") inch rainfall will be discharged by percolation sumpj7 208 pond areas will be- located -on fhe— mmall -the si to and contiguous to Indiana Boulevard to greatest extent possible with fhe excess pond area being placed across Indiana in conjunction with the Park. Mr. Albert G. Angove Mr. Gary S. Nelgon • December 20, 1989 Page Two `f) 4) The shape and grades of the ponds will be determined in final design in the most cost effective manner. 5) The pond areas in the Park will be planted with a variety of natural fesque grass to comply with the Riparian Park concept. Please confirm your understanding of the above by signing a copy of this letter in the space allotted and returning to my attention. I look forward to continuing our design and working with you in the months ahead. PED /tf GARY S. NELSON Regards, PR E \DEVELOPMENT COMPANY k P. c Davis Project Director DATE ALBERT D. ANGOVE DATE cc: Dennis M. Scott /Spokane County Public Works Scott Rhead /Forsgren- Perkins PF 1087- I -A -3 -d AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Document Title: Grantor: Grantee: COUNTY ENGINEER mFM DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER SERVICES Parcel No. 45116.0102 ,■na IRO e, - 2f Ifo. S DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR ROAD SWALES AND SWALE "C" Spokane County Project No. 997049 Page 1 1 1 1 1 III DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR ROAD SWALES AND SWALE "C" Hanson Industries, Inc., a Washington Corporation Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington Abbreviated Legal Description: Lot 2, Block 1, Sullivan Park Center DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR ROAD SWALES AND SWALE "C III III 4110388 Page: 1 of 4 0611011991 10:06f s0.m Seokene Co. U The Grantor, Hanson Industries, Inc., a Washington corporation, (hereinafter referred to as the "Grantor ") for and in consideration of Mutual Benefits, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grants to the public and to Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, a non- exclusive drainage EASEMENT to use a portion of the following described real property situated in the County of Spokane, and the State of Washington, to -wit: Lot 2, Block 1, Sullivan Park Center, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 19 of Plats, pages 25 and 26, Spokane County, Washington. R.E.. •'se Tax Exempt fyllH: �•_' ID oY 1�1 " */ Troas n ,11111 1 11111 111 I IO111 s.i..o a. II The Drainage EASEMENT granted to Spokane County its authorized agents, and to the public, is for the sole purpose of allowing the flow of natural drainage and /or runoff from man made facilities in the public right of way upon the lands described above. The location of said road swale drainage easements and the easement for Swale "C" are as set forth and shown on the approved road plans for Indiana Avenue, Project No. B97049, on file with the Spokane County Engineer's office. Spokane County and its authorized agents are hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to, over and from said Drainage EASEMENTS for the purpose of inspection and emergency maintenance of water quality treatment swales ( "208" swales) and other drainage facilities, if not properly maintained by the Grantor, or its successors in interest. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect or maintain the Drainage Easement or drainage swales, nor does Spokane County accept any liability for any failure by the Grantor or its successors in interest, to properly maintain such areas. The Grantor, or its successors in interest, shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface path of natural or man made drainage flow over and across the property. The Grantors, or its successors in interest, shall maintain all water quality treatment swales ( "208" swales) and drainage ditches situated on the property, and any portion of a "208" swale situated in the public right of way adjacent to the property, with a permanent ground cover as specified on the current approved plans on file at the Spokane County Engineer's Office. The Grantor, or its successors in interest, may install approved shrubbery and /or trees which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the "208" swale and drainage ditches, as indicated by the current approved plans on file with the Spokane County Engineer's Office. The Grantor, or its successors in interest, or its representatives, shall inform each succeeding purchaser of all Drainage EASEMENTS on the property and of their responsibility for maintaining surface drainage paths and swales within said Drainage EASEMENTS. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course within Drainage EASEMENTS or floodplain areas on the property, nor the responsibility for any damage whatsoever, including, but not limited to, inverse DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR ROAD SWALES AND SWALE "C" Spokane County Project No. B97049 Page 2 4110388 Page: 2 of 4 0611011997 10:061 DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR ROAD SWALES AND SWALE "C" Spokane County Project No. B97049 Page 3 II 111111 I I III I II o uo 111111 II I3l 6/06/10/1497 I0:00A CO condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and or maintenance of drainage courses in Drainage EASEMENTS on the property. If the Grantor, or its successors in interest, fails to maintain the surface path of natural or man made drainage flow, or the drainage swale, a notice of such failure may be given to the Grantor, or its successors in interest. If not corrected within the period indicated on said notice, Spokane County has the right to correct the maintenance failure, or have it corrected, at the expense of Grantor, or its successors in interest. All of the promises, covenants, terms and conditions of this Drainage EASEMENT shall survive any conveyance, and this Drainage EASEMENT shall extend to and bind the successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. This DRAINAGE EASEMENT shall run with the land in perpetuity. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed on this s{+' day of .jdAt , 1997. HANSON INDUSTRIES, INC. By or?. W • tsar R.A. Hanson - President STATE OF WASHINGTON County of Spokane Witne smy 'arid 3R& ?± year first dideib eit NOTAR. - PUCLIC MY Oc:d4'SSio! EXPIRES 5-1 1 ...flail I abbal Bill Johns, Spokane County Engineer DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND SWALE "C" Spokane County Project No. Page 4 SS. SWALES B97049 II II 1 1 11 IIII FAS 1 1 11 I CI 0 SO.00 Spokane Co. 171 On this 1,/ day of Tow? 1997, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared R.A. Hanson, to me known to be the President of Hanson Industries, Inc., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. .- . - ... - ial sealto affi d the day and Notary Public and for the State of Washington, Residing at s/bksee My Appointment Expires:J - Date AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: COUNTY ENGINEER DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER SERVICES Document Title: Grantor: Grantee: MSG Parcel Parcel No. 45116.0102 - MINA a.n'a f-ve_ - Wu • a c30 1 11 SIDEWALK, SNOW STORAGE AND SIGNAGE EASEMENT Hanson Industries, Inc., a Washington Corporation Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington Abbreviated Legal Description: Lot 2, Block 1, Sullivan Park Center (full legal on pages 1 and 2 of document) SIDEWALK, SNOW STORAGE AND SIGNAGE EASEMENT The Grantor, Hanson Industries, Inc., a Washington corporation, (hereinafter referred to as the "Grantor ") for and in consideration of Mutual Benefits, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grants to the public and to Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, a non- exclusive EASEMENT to use the following described real property situated in the County of Spokane, and the State of Washington, to -wit: That portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Sullivan Park Center, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 19 of Plats, Pages 25 and 26, Spokane County, Washington, lying southerly of and adjoining the southerly right -of -way I III o ge; Gse o.a61 S 1 W Spokane Co, IN SIDEWALK, SNOW STORAGE AND SIGNAGE EASEMENT Spokane County Project No. 897049 A.F.- iseTexExempt , Page 1 _ On:,s_ L 0 m ll 111 11 I I I I I I I (I III Vim I 06110 1 � 0:064 line of Indiana Avenue, shown as sidewalk snow storage and signage easement areas on the final right -of -way and road plans for Indiana Avenue on file at the Spokane County Engineer's office. The EASEMENT granted to Spokane County and its authorized agents, and to the public, is for pedestrian traffic over and across the above - described sidewalk. The EASEMENT is also granted for the purpose of disposal of snow, snow storage and the installation and use of street signs and other informational control signage. This EASEMENT granted to Spokane County shall take priority over any other surface or above - ground easement granted to the described easement area and no other easement shall interfere with the surface or above - ground EASEMENT granted herein. In consideration of mutual benefits to each party and the mutual covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto agrees as follows: 1. The EASEMENT may be used only for purposes of disposing snow, storing snow, erection of roadway signage, and for public use of the sidewalk. 2. Spokane County may plow snow from the roadway onto the EASEMENT and sidewalk within the EASEMENT that abut such roadway, at its sole expense. Grantor shall remove such snow from the sidewalks in a timely manner and keep them clear for pedestrian use, at the Grantor's sole expense. When Grantor removes the snow from the sidewalk it shall be the Grantor's sole responsibility to dispose of the snow. No snow shall be placed or inadvertently discarded onto the paved roadway. Grantor shall be responsible for keeping the sidewalks clear of snow and debris. Grantor shall be responsible for any damages arising out of Grantor's negligence or acts or omissions in operations concerning snow and debris removal. 3. After the roadway signage has been installed, Spokane County shall maintain the roadway signage in good order and repair, and in proper operating condition at its own expense; except if the Grantor damages the roadway signage during its snow and debris removal process, as is stated in this EASEMENT, the Grantor shall promptly repair or replace the damage at the Grantor's own expense. SIDEWALK, SNOW STORAGE AND SIGNAGE EASEMENT Spokane County Project No. B97049 Page 2 1 111111 4110389 Page: 3 of 4 C6/10 f1997 10:06A Spokane Co. NA 4. Spokane County agrees that all work within this EASEMENT, or in connection with this EASEMENT, shall be done in a manner so as to minimize interference with the operations of, and public access to the retail shopping center, to be located on Lot 2, Block 1 of Sullivan Park Center plat. 5. Grantor agrees to permit the County to install additional safety measures within the EASEMENT, if deemed necessary by the County Engineer. 6. Spokane County is responsible for the repair and replacement of any surface material damaged in the course of road signage installation, or the maintenance or removal of such signs. After sign constructions has been completed, Spokane County shall be responsible for any damages arising out of the County's negligence which may occur in the course of installation, operation, maintenance, and repair of signs. 7. All of the promises, covenants, terms and conditions of this EASEMENT shall survive any conveyance, and this EASEMENT shall extend to and bind the successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. This EASEMENT shall run with the land in perpetuity. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed on this *day of Jane , 1997. HANSON INDUSTRIES, INC. SIDEWALK, SNOW STORAGE AND SIGNAGE EASEMENT Spokane County Project No. B97049 Page 3 By a� • (ti • W4,0-00-2 R.A. Hanson - President STATE OF WASHINGTON County of Spokane On this 'V day of Toys , 1997, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared R.A. Hanson, to me known to be the President of Hanson Industries, Inc., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. W year f 1j Es mye a W A iUd n official s STATE 0? IYASNI^ISI0N NOTAE∎ NY CC,C 'i:Gi:u': l • Bill Johns, P Spokane County Engineer SS. 1 is 1 Date here SIDEWALK, SNOW STORAGE AND SIGNAGE EASEMENT Spokane County Project No. B97049 Page 4 1 11 1 Notary •lic in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Spokane My Appointment Expires: ,f 4110389 Page: 4 of 4 0611011997 10:051 Spokane Ce. M ffixed the day and AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Drew M. Bodker Attorney at Law 1401 S. Grand Blvd. #203N Spokane, WA 99203 Document Title: Grantor: Grantee: Abbreviated Legal Description: Parcel Nos. 1 Hanson Industries, Inc., Corporation Hanson Industries, Inc., Corporation 1 Lot 2, Block 1, and Lots Sullivan Park Center W I T N E S S E T H : iii 11 1 11 II 410888 11 Page, 1 of 8 1 0610411997 11:50A c e m Srdms is DECLARATION OF DRAINAGE PIPELINE EASEMENT DECLARATION OP DRAINAGE PIPELINE EASEMENT a Washington a Washington 1 and 2, Block 2 45116.0102; 45116.0202; 45115.0201 This Declaration of Drainage Pipeline Easement (the "Easement "), is made and entered into this 29th day of May, 1997, by HANSON INDUSTRIES, INC., a Washington corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor ", WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of certain real property located in Spokane County, Washington, legally described as: Lot 2, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 19 of Plats, pages 25 and 26, Spokane County, Washington, and DECLARATION OF DRAINAGE PIPELINE EASEMENT R. E. Excise Tax acon� Spokane County Project No. B97049 Date 72y-it 9 1 iy 8 (.7 Page 1 Spokane Courtly ^�' IIII111 II��1 1�� III1�I I I I 4199 I1 :5G1 WHEREAS, Grantor wishes to develop retail shopping facilities on Lot 2, Block 1 of Sullivan Park Center, and WHEREAS, Spokane County requires, as a condition to development of Lot 2, Block 1 of the subject property, that Grantor provide an easement for construction and maintenance of a storm water drainage pipeline from the proposed development on Lot 2, Block 1, to the storm water detention pond facility to located on Lot 1, Block 2, above- described, all of which will benefit Lot 2, Block 1, Sullivan Park, and which will enable Grantor and Grantor's successors in interest to enjoy the benefits of said storm water drainage pipeline and detention pond facility, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits to be derived hereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. Grantor hereby declares, grants and conveys a easement twenty feet (20') in width over, under, on and across the above - described Lot 2, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 2 of Sullivan Park Center, substantially as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, or as ultimately constructed, with the center line of said 20' wide easement being the actual location of the drainage pipeline, as constructed. 2. The storm water drainage pipeline shall be constructed and maintained at the sole cost and expense of Grantor and /or Grantor's successors in interest. By allowing development based upon this easement, Spokane County is not accepting responsibility for maintaining the drainage pipeline described herein, nor is Spokane County accepting any responsibility for any damage whatsoever, including, but not limited to, inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction or maintenance of the storm water drainage pipeline. 3. Use of that portion of Lot 1, Block 2, Sullivan Park Center, as above - described, shall not be inconsistent with the Conditions of Approval for the Sullivan Park Center Plat on file with Spokane County under file PE- 1504 -85. 4. All of the promises, covenants, terms and conditions of this Easement shall survive any conveyance, and this Easement DECLARATION OF DRAINAGE PIPELINE EASEMENT Spokane County Project No. B97049 Page 2 shall extend to and bind the successors and assigns of the Grantor. This Easement shall run with the land in perpetuity. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument as of the day and year first above- written. STATE OF WASHINGTON County of Spokane DREW ;'.. BOOKER .I STATE DS 1'11 Nro SS. On this H' day of J4n.e 1997, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared R.A. Hanson, to me known to be the President of Hanson Industries, Inc., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. Witness my hand and official seal i eto affixes the day and year first above written. DRAINAGE PIPELINE EASEMENT Spokane County Project No. B97049 Page 3 1101111111111111111111,14 HANSON INDUSTRIES, INC. Ey �. 4. / R.A. Hanson - President 4108688 Page: 304 WNI1991 11:501 growl* fn O Notary •lic in and for the State of Washington, Residing atP My Appointment Expires: r -ntv II III IIIII IIIIIII III IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJIIIIIII O ?688, EXHIBIT "A" AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Drew M. Bodker Attorney at Law 1401 S. Grand Blvd. #203N Spokane, WA 99203 I !l III Document Title: DECLARATION OF STORM WATER DETENTION POND FACILITY AND MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT Grantor: Hanson Industries, Inc., a Washington Corporation Grantee: Hanson Industries, Inc., a Washington Corporation Abbreviated Legal Description: Lot 2, Block 1, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 Sullivan Park Center (full legal on page 4 of document) Parcel Nos. 45116.0102; 45116.0202; 45115.0201 DECLARATION OF STORM WATER DETENTION POND FACILITY AND MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT This Declaration of Storm Water Detention Pond Facility and Maintenance Access Easement (the "Easement "), is made and entered into this 29th day of May, 1997, by HANSON INDUSTRIES, INC., a Washington corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor ", W I T N E S S E T H : WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of certain real property located in Spokane County, Washington, legally described as: Lot 2, Block 1, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, SULLIVAN PARK MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT Spokane County Project No. B97049 Page 1 ii VII III 06104/1997 8 9 :561 R. E. Excise Tax Exempt Date 01 4 /. 19 Spokane County Trea iLi MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT Spokane County Project No. B97049 Page 2 III I I II II I I III II IIII I I I II II II II I I II III 0690411997 ( 1 1 1:561 Ie ()MI Rn&,n.fn II CENTER, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 19 of Plats, pages 25 and 26, Spokane County, Washington, and WHEREAS, Grantor wishes to develop retail shopping facilities on Lot 2, Block 1 of Sullivan Park Center and WHEREAS, Spokane County requires, as a condition to development of Lot 2, Block 1 of the subject property, that Grantor provide an easement for construction and maintenance of a storm water detention pond facility on Lot 2, Block 2 of Sullivan Park Center and also that Grantor provide an access easement for access maintenance purposes to said storm water detention pond, which easements will benefit Lot 2, Block 1, Sullivan Park, and which will enable Grantor and Grantor's successors in interest to enjoy the benefits of said storm water detention pond and the access rights for maintenance thereof, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits to be derived hereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. Grantor hereby declares, grants and conveys a easement for the purpose of constructing, improving, repairing, cleaning and maintaining a storm water detention pond across, over and upon that portion of Lot 1, Block 2, Sullivan Park Center, as legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, which Exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth. 2. Grantor further declares, grants and conveys an access easement for ingress and egress, on, over, and across a portion of Lot 1, Block 2 and Lot 2, Block 2, Sullivan Park Center, which access easement is also legally described on Exhibit "A" and is shown on Exhibit "B ". 3. The storm water detention pond facilities and the access easement shall be constructed and maintained at the sole cost and expense of Grantor and /or Grantor's successors in interest. By allowing development based upon these easements, Spokane County is not accepting responsibility for maintaining the access easement or the storm water detention pond facilities described herein, nor is Spokane County accepting any responsibility for any damage whatsoever, including, but not limited to, inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction or maintenance of the storm water detention pond 4. Use of that portion of iill IIIIIIIIIIIII1llll r p .5Ut shall not be inconsistent with the Conditions of Approval for the Sullivan Park Center Plat on file with Spokane County under file PE- 1504 -85. 5. All of the promises, covenants, terms and conditions of this Easement shall survive any conveyance, and this Easement shall extend to and bind the successors and assigns of the Grantor. This Easement shall run with the land in perpetuity. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument as of the day and year first above- written. S ^ L'. c ?t!: .!• MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT Spokane County Project No. B97049 Page 3 HANSON INDUSTRIES, INC. By O i R.A. Hanson - President STATE OF WASHINGTON as. County of Spokane On this 4e ' day of Tama_ 1997, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared R.A. Hanson, to me known to be the President of Hanson Industries, Inc., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. Witness my hand and official seal he to a fix es• the day and year first abovve _ DREW M PODKER STATF 0' W:.^`i.`tCTCM) Nott"ry P blic in and for the State of Washington, Residing at "2:&a4, My Appointment Expires: rt?-oo DRAINAGE EASEMENT D•2: EXHIBIT "A' 111 III ii 061041111:50A 991 11: 1 Dakar* al INGRESS- EBRPSS EASEMENT 1A1 1, BLACK -2: M Ingress- Egress easement ova that portion of Id 1 Black 2 of the Plat of "511121VAN PARK CENTER ", as recorded in Book 19 of Pia, pages 25 and 76, In Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Begin at the Northwest iorner of sold Id 1, being the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a adios of 1547.00 feet and a radial bearing of 13'20'3&W; thence Southeasterly, through a central angle of 50'13 ", along the North tight of way (IVW) line of Indiana Avenue, an arc distance of 1356.14 fm to the end of curve; (hence S 53'07'01 "E, slung said RAM line, 334.35 feet to a corner between Ids 1 and 2 of said Block 1; thence N 36'52'59"E, along a line between did lots 1 and 2, 28.09 feel to an angle pninl in said line; thence S 48'22'03 "E, along the commou line between said Lots 1 and 2, 235.49 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence N 50'30'33 "E 11.12 feel lo the beginning of 1 curve concave to the Sash with a radios of 110.00 feel; thence Northeasterly, through a central angle of 73'24'56 ", an arc distance of 1411.95 feel to the Intersection with s line bearing N 33'58'12 "E from a point on the common line between a aid Ids 1 and 2, 109.51 feel bon the True Point of Beginning; Thence S 33'58'12 "W 20.00 fed to a point an a curve concave lo the South with • radius of 90.00 feel and a ',dial bearing of N 33'54'53'E; thence Southwesterly, Through • central angle of 73 ", an arc distance of 115.30 fed to the end of CUM; thence S 50'30'33 "W 8.00 feel to the common line between said Las 1 and 2; thence N 48'22'03 "W 20.24 fed to the True Point of Beginning. INGRESS- EGRESS EASEMENT LOT 2, BLOCK -2' An Ingress-Egret' moment over that potion of Id 2 Block 2 of the Plat of "SULUVAN PARK CE.NBER ", as recorded in Book 19 of Plats, pages 25 and 26, In Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Iegin al the Northwest caner of said Lat 2; thence S 48 "P, along the North line of Bald IA 2, 135.49 fed to the l'ruc Point of Beginning; (hence 5 50 "W 44.48 feet to the South line of said Id 2 and point on a cove concave to the Soulhwesl with a radios of 993.00 feet and a radial beating of 14 49'55'56 "E; thence Southeasterly, Through a camel angle of 1'19'14 ", along said South line, an are distance of 211011 led; Venue N 50'30'33 "E, on a non - tangent line, 47.61 fed to the North line of old Id 2; thence N 48'22'03 "W 20.24 feel to the True Point of Beginning. A drainage easement over That potllon of 1d 1 Black 2 of the Plat of 'SULLIVAN PARK CENTER ", as resided in Dock 19 of Plats, pages 25 and 26, in Spokane Canty, Washington, duelhed as follows: Begin at the Northwest corner of said Lai 1, being the beginning of • curve concave to the Southwest with • radius of 1547.00 feet and a radial bearing of 14 13'20'38"W; thence Southasierly, through • central angle of 50'13'37 ", along the North right of way (R/W) line of Indiana Avenue, en arc distance of 1356.14 feel to the end of curve; thence 5 53'07'01 "E, along add R/W line, 334.35 fed 10 a caner between Ines I and 2 of said Block 2; thence N 36'52'59 "E, along a line between said Lois 1 and 2, 28.09 fed to an angle point in aid line; thence 5 48'22'03 "E, along the common line between said Ids 1 and 2, 345.00 fed to the True Potnl of Beginning; thence continuing 5 48'2I'03 "E 9.76 feel to an angle point In said common line; thence 5 55'03'24 "E, along the common line between aid Ids 1 and 2 62500 feet theaters/ 33'23'02 "E 127.73 feet to the North line of said La 1; thence N 57•26•08 "W, along the North line of said Lot 1, 210.00 feet to the beginning of • curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 2874.80 fed; thence Northwesterly, through a central angle of 8'17' ", along the North line of said Id 1, an arc distance of 424.24 feet lo the Inlerseelbn with a line hearing N 33'58'12 "E horn the True Point of Beginning; thence S 33'58'12"W 131.53 fed to the True Point of Beginning. LI II 11 1 is 1I Cif 1 1 11 III II 4108689 Page: 5 of 5 0510411997 11:50A e m snnV.n. r■ Wt AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: COUNTY ENGINEER C7 FlG DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER SERVICES Parcel No. 45116.0102 - �nd∎a•na PrOe. - 2>= No. .So DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR ROAD SWALES AND SWALE "C" Spokane County Project No. B97049 Page 1 11 II i 1 DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR ROAD SWALES AND SWALE "C" 11 1 Document Title: DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR ROAD SWALES AND SWALE "C" Grantor: Hanson Industries, Inc., a Washington Corporation Grantee: Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington Abbreviated Legal Description: Lot 2, Block 1, Sullivan Park Center I III 4110388 Page: 1 of 4 0611011997 10:064 S . m Spokane Co. 1A The Grantor, Hanson Industries, Inc., a Washington corporation, (hereinafter referred to as the "Grantor ") for and in consideration of Mutual Benefits, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grants to the public and to Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, a non- exclusive drainage EASEMENT to use a portion of the following described real property situated in the County of Spokane and the State of Washington, to -wit: Lot 2, Block 1, Sullivan Park Center, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 19 of Plats, pages 25 and 26, Spokane County, Washington. R.E. t. ise Tex Exempt 19 7roasu m 11 1111 I 11 1 I I I 11111 The Drainage EASEMENT granted to Spokane County its authorized agents, and to the public, is for the sole purpose of allowing the flow of natural drainage and /or runoff from man made facilities in the public right of way upon the lands described above. The location of said road swale drainage easements and the easement for Swale "C" are as set forth and shown on the approved road plans for Indiana Avenue, Project No. 897049, on file with the Spokane County Engineer's office. Spokane County and its authorized agents are hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to, over and from said Drainage EASEMENTS for the purpose of inspection and emergency maintenance of water quality treatment swales ( "208" swales) and other drainage facilities, if not properly maintained by the Grantor, or its successors in interest. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect or maintain the Drainage Easement or drainage swales, nor does Spokane County accept any liability for any failure by the Grantor or its successors in interest, to properly maintain such areas. The Grantor, or its successors in interest, shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface path of natural or man made drainage flow over and across the property. The Grantors, or its successors in interest, shall maintain all water quality treatment swales ( "208" swales) and drainage ditches situated on the property, and any portion of a "208" swale situated in the public right of way adjacent to the property, with a permanent ground cover as specified on the current approved plans on file at the Spokane County Engineer's Office. The Grantor, or its successors in interest, may install approved shrubbery and /or trees which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the "208" swale and drainage ditches, as indicated by the current approved plans on file with the Spokane County Engineer's Office. The Grantor, or its successors in interest, or its representatives, shall inform each succeeding purchaser of all Drainage EASEMENTS on the property and of their responsibility for maintaining surface drainage paths and swales within said Drainage EASEMENTS. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course within Drainage EASEMENTS or floodplain areas on the property, nor the responsibility for any damage whatsoever, including, but not limited to, inverse DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR ROAD SWALES AND SWALE "C" Spokane County Project No. B97049 Page 2 4110388 Pege: 2 of 4 061100297 fa:%A snra", az BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST FOR PE- 1504 -85 SULLIVAN PARK CENTER AN APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT. THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. has been received and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter III, Section G) and RCW 58.17.140. FINDINGS OF FACT ) FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION a) A portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized (see Finding #8). 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning. 2. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Board of County Commissioners on March 25, 1986. 3. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and department policy for short subdivisions. These criteria are found in Chapter III, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this decision. 4. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Industrial, and the location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. 5. No additional conditions have been recommended by the various reviewing agencies and departments, including the County Engineer's Office, County Health District, County Utilities and the Department of Building & Safety. 6. This is the second request for a time extension. The total life of the preliminary plat has been approximately 6 years. 7. The proposal is a mixed use development on a 226 acre parcel. Included are a 79 acre regional shopping center, 19 acres of other commercial use, a 22 acre business park, a 53 acre industrial park, and 43 acres of roadways and open space. 8. Of the 42 lots approved in the original preliminary plat, four (4) have been finalized and are within the final plat of Sullivan Park Center, which was recorded at the Spokane County Auditor's Office on April 26, 1990. Therefore, 38 of the original 42 lots remain to be finalized. 9. The applicant has demonstrated substantial progress toward completing the preliminary plat and has also demonstrated compliance with the criteria for considering an extension of time (see Chapter III, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance) of a preliminary plat, as evidenced by the following: b) The preliminary plat remains consistent with the adopted Spokane County Comprehensive Plan. c) The applicant has made progress toward completing specific conditions of approval (i.e. traffic improvements). d) The applicant has dedicated a portion of the final plat of Sullivan Park Center to Spokane County for park purposes. e) Additional progress toward filing the preliminary plat is contained in a letter to file #PE- 1504-85 dated September 9, 1991. NOV 2 61991 SPd&.4':t G. arc CI ENGINEER 1 Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1504 -85 Page 2 ohn Pederson Planner lI enclosure REV 1/90 Aadeffm- c: County Division of Engineering and Roads County Division of Utilities County Health District County Division of Buildings Drew Bodker Surveyor File CONCLUSIONS BASED UPON A REVIEW of (a) the criteria for approving an extension of time of the expiration date for a preliminary plat and (b) the above Findings of Fact, the following conclusions are made. 1. The applicant has demonstrated substantial progress toward completing the preliminary plat as stated by Findings #8 & 9. In review of the above stated progress, and the criteria specified by Chapter III Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, a three year extension of time is warranted. DECISION BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request for application PE- 1504 -85 Sullivan Park Center is hereby APPROVED until December 1, 1994. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. All those conditions of approval attached to the original preliminary plat, as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on March 25, 1986, and as specified by Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Findings and Order dated November 19, 1985, with the following exception: a. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for three (3) years to December 1, 1994. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request 45 days prior to the above expiration date. DATED THIS 676 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1991. Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with $120 processing fee,to the Spokane County Planning Department, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456 -2205. T 1 1V(fsD - 01 .. -t. Z ((co 230to0 /d�K -1� a7 /c)--Gf0° /,,,1-) -71- CO S4 , Gctrs-c-: c i fi To /J Urn /'S "- S (r /LSR 6-'5- ■ s� 3 (5r) q/± 7 ,, 7 / - I m 0 7l /- 4 O 0 q± 0 g 3 r ;a0 6no 7 (/ 1J &)v (9.i/ 5 4 To _ C ;,rs 3 l y (b4) il • STRUCTURAL DESIGN CHART FOR FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS 54 5a 64 STABILOMETER R AL E M . ail1�n aaaaaaQaanptaaaaa a1IIIMOVIIIII ll (UunmunIunN ■ u :\\ \BUBt\ MTh Aagaaaa aasuu manna a ma nN a 11 ��1p aaauOOM n\q\ Ki .I n g w� M N anwwwwl IIMSIMawwa02 aaaaaa Maaaaaraat\aaniq maaa an W nnnaann wN►AawwCw• epee \aaa 025 ACP 050 CTB MI um OR 0.25' ACP +O JS'ACB �� aMI M I VI aaaaa qa �auauaaa + . • N!�'IwaB 161101110118111111116.1M1 pm �ua/a Bu dalaaa m ;a 111111011011/11111 mn au MM NM ew EMIR NN18N11a aaaaeaa 11141.11= 11141.11= a gaaaNOaNalNaaaldNiaa/twa/ t aa Oath aII nn M naamaan snat6 a 121111111111 =HIM MOMS �a NNa IANIMAIRIEMi1Baa le Mg1= MEMO NM MI maauauN..N aa/ aauuaannNaaa�SINWA aN11ViT mamaaHIMMI NIVAVAMMIO I maNanaa�alN�N��Ia�a flaw laagaeaanaaaa•Na uaaa �a I.aul ells aiault a n tln n Aiausla a aana a aaanMlanaaanlaao W+a ESE on I N asa m a llp n p aaaaaa \a \aanamaaua \ \a�lgN gaat wNw w VAIIINIM0 d �wNw��Nrnrn aga llaaai= UMW aia m mat aanaaaNaNNaa11NE711aNN�aNaNalna anaan u !11 raaalaaaal ! allapalalan/■ aa' paalllel ®elaai�00asaamaa•a°aaaa°ia�uma SAIIIIiiR ►a�c60Yr1�aa�NM1all eons ma 7 •O a 111W11111•18111a eseimemammeavivaiiiiirmlinneer Kam ens em 1111111211111111111111/14flaWIS 1M MI MNIMIIIII1MSfl non o1 _t � Tr .•r anitasaaaa uaaallYalw N�IaaalaaaNNaNa pan IIIIM up Iki uaaaaaEOM =MEMO a aaNaaaaaa n .Anna nsinaaaUallie1111 . al MN MINIM NNNa nammaaaaaan nh.nhIaaannapncX h1a p H MI Ui1RNN 1 � laaa aaaanaa/ „a Mmaaaa _ aa . Y uuSCOMOOR W Naa a i •iiiias Nit•i• mamautai a�amaaaanmaaa mn naaaaaaN MSS Bq aN eau a M �a ta168: I B1 MO aaa eat �aN�Aatgala� a faala/Na a aalal4 /4aaaUa{% �4n aaN aI aaa Naaaa � ram 0.35' ACP + 0.65' CTB, OR 0.35' ACP + 0.45' ACB 0.35' ACP + 0 CTB .OR 0.35' ACP + 0.35' ACB , • 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0.30' ACP 1 w 1 0.25' ACP' 0.20 15' ACP ACP a 3.0 2.9 2.I 2.7 2 2 2 2 . 2 . 2 . 2 . 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0. 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 10 20 i 30 , 40 50 0 70 80 90 SU LL'lvAN 0.5 6 EXAMPLE: Given an R vulu• of 25 and a traffic indaa of 6.0. hicicnan r•auv•mants ton b• d•t•rmin•d at follows 8 C' 1. '9 An •Auivalant gravel depth of 1.65 1 round to 1.7 ) at point A. A modiliad surfacing depth of 1.05 loan at point 8 for a povom•nt of 0.351aot ACP + 0.50 fool CTB, or 0.35 foot ACP + 0.35 foot ACB. A modili•d surfacing depth *11.43 foot ( round to 1.45) for povom•nt of 0.35 foot ACP. Pell << Ctwre R P i Figure 326 -2a 326 -5 SURFACING DEPTH (FEET) Ea l+ +^^ C(, oS- 2.0 2.5 -a 0.35' ACP 3.0 MODI IE sg ( C C RUs{ SP, 1hof�tfi4 *v� Su7{a� �cN� l D tP sa �,o§ q Q r, S8 7/1 •75 5 y ak cod SEPTEMBER 1977 * * * * * - * * k * * * * * * * * * * * * * FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER N. 811 JEFFERSON ST. SPOKANE, WA 99260 -0180 FAX (509) 456 -4715 ,TEL (509) 456 -3600 DATE: / dt3 /a 9 TIME: 3:5C '4711 TO: flr\ k e 214; 0 ; � 5 DEPARTMENT: Si s O r\ En 6-R.-- FAX TELEPHONE: °0 c24 — 1 32-;3 VOICE TELEPHONE: 9 --6 — )32-'a.__ FROM: DEPARTMENT: L hi.O 1/40 5W g 6 P N T COMMENTS: t/4/M/5oNS iJLL YV/AN _39R k YY�A2 f' y4 LyE. RE SLILTS PAGE OF Miscellaneous Field Dist. Lab. Fracture Fine: Fracture Course: — / Sand Equivalent: ' Sieving . ❑ Wel ❑ Dry ❑ Wet Q Ory - - ISEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Matarlah Labor . Box 167 0 ympla, WA 98604 :Malagal -- (`-"( Control Sample! - -- Certificate Nor z.- - ^�3'Ouant. Represented: i ' .Z".r'Aggregatea: Washed — ra y-Stockpile No ( t y} Sampled /Tested by: j (nCCni(nm Sampled at: 1-ot a P1. flt' S Dete;Sampled (C"( Fiefdi Acceptance Rejection • Field Teat Results —Report all screens used: Scr _Eleld%Pao, -- Dint. Lab. % Pass •Spec'.a.. S/S GramsiLbs. Reniovedby District Lab' ... • Remarks: - ' F a - . Run.. ' (M(,h_ DOT REVISED 2 /ea l .sal: TEST REPORT FOR" LAB. NO.45 707 ' -. .7 - : Sieve Analysis': of;'Aggregate,- ".. .. "' Other'Test :Results Passing Cumulative Screen Vt.'Grms: ""Retain' , I 1 - - Total Weight - - -- Remarks ID No: White Copy with Semple • Yellow Copy tor Proj. Files Mtls;. File,c Gen File C . Ph's.Test Chem. Lab ist.Admin. - Proj. Eng. 717_4A -t. -X(2) nist, Mtls. Eng. FORM 350 -062 REVISED 2/8 �a •%s O 0.h CONTROL SAMPLE TRANSMITTAL -m ,Crvc Field Teat No.: Truck /Car No • Produced to Date: Scalped — [': Pit No d)IY(kSS, ce f e a Subcontractor — to Sta Place: 1 - Organization Cotle:4 5tel. /46 t ! Forwardedbyctre)Kcfl? CD Tested • i SPS No • " • Other t. Asphalt in Mix: Design �.. Spec. % Pass: Req.' Frac r — 1 t Labor Codes Hdqtrs Dist Contract o. Section S I M :irk.. /46 +50 F A No ' "— CS No• County , lone - Contractor — Project Engineer ro 74 /1'�i z Phone: (SCAN) ,60r '1Lt3hl - 7" Co 3 `4'• Lab No • Lab No 77 SR No.: (3TUI) P.rese. Date' Based on Field Test No • 141 6 % Plan % Extract • - Fill IR8 - 3 Los Angeles Test Degradation Test Bulk S. Gravity Sand Equivalent Dust Ratio Stabilometer: "R" Value &oSZ Swell Pressure /'2 — Drainage Factor 11tr�- S/. ad 0ra1. ! Dat4lN 201989 By L JOHN R. STRADA P.E. MATERIALS ENGINEER % Miscellaneous Field Dist. Lab. Fracture Fine: _ Fracture Course:. _ _ Sand Equivalent: .. Sieving D Wet D Dry D Wet 'D Dry ' tirrit RTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION e Mai. Laboratory P.O. Box 157 Olympia, WA Deno, _ TRANSMITTAL • Material: ll r- Brand: ID No.: Control Sample No • Z Field Test No.: - -_` Certificate No - - '- Truck /Car No - 1. Quant. Represented:5��f!1 i eh D�� / }rp c Fioduced to Date: Aggregates: Washed - "'Scalped I ' t Stockpile No.: Pit No• pnr 1 4 s sCc- $Fotn Used at Ste 1 Z f00 to Sta Cc. Sampled /Tested by: M. / nW rN1 Sampled at: 11. N nr s a SUi ;tall `ta: 1 ?3 +ao Date: Sampled - 1 -gri Tested Field: Acceptance Field Teat Results -Report all screens used: Rejection COI�ROL SAMPLE Sc Field % Pass Diet. Lab. % Pass Spec'e S/S Gri ms7LtThi Reliioved'by District Lab: • °:Remarks: • Pier - -- • -DOT REVISED 2/84 t - -ee): • • • 'TEST REPORT FOR White Copy with Sample Yellow Copy for Proj. Files . _ "'.Sieve Ahalysi's:7o 'Aggregat "e'' Passing Cumulative % Screen • Wt. Grms.---Retain -- I 1 1 1 1 1 I t 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 _ -- _ 1 Total Weight Remarks Mtls. File_)c_ Gen. File_ Phys.Test Q.C.___ Chem. Lab _ Dist.Adm_in. — Proj. Eng. Tom +°'""° -- X(2) Dist. Mtls. Eng. FORM 350 -062 REVISED So ,' /5 5,po »n e o -. Pass: r Project Engineer bM yr l Phone; (SCAN) 456 "36JQ Spec. Rec.' Frac ; I I 1 1 1 7. 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 Labor Codes ' 1 wQ IAA8 .JIJN 13.1 T43 H- 0342 JOHN R, STRADA P.E. 7634 MATERIAj,S ENGINE Cp 46 Hdqtrs Lab No • Dist. Lab. No.: � / n? Contract No.: Jl1( OO 01 ml T SR No • 5 Sir 123tda. LE i� Fr a Su!I /cn Section F A No • C. No • J - County S flr - l Contractor 1 J1 1,11 ) ., ' -. Subcontractor -' 1 - V :dad • -4 Place: — mss,, e " = � 'tt_•• - / Date' E Organization Code'46T 7 - + •, Q -Ui'Mt t F: ;i..i • f Forwarded by r"/ kG(k' Co. SPS No' • -Other Asphalt in Mix: Design - % Plan - % Extract - - - % Based on Field Test No - LAB. NO. E7 /_0 Other.Test Results . - Los Angeles Test Degradation Test Bulk S. Gravity Sand Equivalent Dust Ratio Stabilometer: - "R" Value ,SL Swell Pressure b Drainage Factor___ _ No-e aea • /t ‘ Rt _ ; DatJUN 201989 By 00 Miscellaneous Field Dist. Lab. Fracture Fine: - - - - „ -„ Fracture Course: Sand Equivalent: S / S Sieving .❑ Wet O.D,j . , ❑ West Dry :. _ Screen i {; S / S -Field %Pees ` Diet. Lab. % Pees , .- " ...._.. _.�- i .: ... .. ...... . . .: .. 1p„1 At ' M19ir ale Laboratory OF TRANSPORTATION I ' •,, _ ' r P.O. Box la - • OL SAMPLE Olympia, WA 98504 TRANSMITTAL Materiel: S/ k rar) f Contract No.: v M 601? 7 Brand: '- IDNo.: — ) Section ' psi 5it, • &7-rnn Control Semple No • Z Field Test No.: - l F A No • - - Certificate No . ` . •t Truck /Car No • - r C S No • - 1 la< w Quart. Represented SfI �h �rir.+v.)Produged to Date - ) ' 1 County '+p Ik(i0P Aggregates: Washed J Scalped - �: Contractor '— . Stockpile No.:' ' Pit No • 1 3 5 iR . 16 • r 1.r Subcontractor ▪ Used e f S9riX7 at Ste to Ste — - ), i Place: a Sampled /Tested by f'iccn - : Organization Code 1 Sampled at: Sb. A 7 trio j ' ? x I, Forwarded by ' Date:. Sampled`( - ?-. 9 Tested . Mix Design Desired: Ir. - Field: Acceptance ' — Rejection' ' ' Other - • ' FieldTest Results =Report all screens used: - - Ir ; Asphalt in Mix: Design • DO I REVISED 2//84 -807- TEST REPORT FOR Passing Screen Cumulative % Wt: Grms. Retain I I 1 - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _ I I I I 1 - -- t I • I � 1 Total Weight___ Remarks Mtls. File._ Gen. File_ Phys.Test A Q.C. Chem. Lab Dist.Admin. Proj. Eng. `E 9akt X(2) Dist. Mtls. Eng. FORM .'50 -062 VISED 2/ so s O Qtn & Grams /Lbs. Removed by District Latjr . t r.. (.((l `n 0G fk. • -t „,. rc . White Copy with Sample: o \ r . Yellow Copy for Proj. Files. •Sieve _ -of - Aggregate I I I 1 I 1 I I • SPS No• — Project Engineer Y'{3 H - 6'311-Z I T�3 0 1 1 Phone: (SCAN) 456 --3600 % Spec. % Pass. Req. Frac r I � 1 Labor Codes hm Ya ks_ Los Angeles Bulk Sand Dust Hdqtrs Lab No Dist. Lab. No. SR No 4719. S. Gravity Equivalent Ratio 1_63 4�»7J Dete Based on Field Test No • J % Plan % ' JUli 13 138 LAB: NO.' 7103 Other Test' Result's'',” Test Degradation Test Stabilometer: "R" Value 3 8 Swell Pressure 0. /I— Drainage Factor f/l SfO� 0rt.7717 Datejt11190 1419SY L JOHN R. STRADA P.E. MATER& SSA NGI • % 1334 H1430 PERC —RATE 9 ( ONIU -H 1 NNf IO-V3 i OY9-e 0 3!!00-3 'ON 3ldfY3 alCQt PENETRATION RESISTANCE (N)VALUE BLOW/ FT. % . 1N31140 3Wf11S 1011 D i l-9 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GROUNDWATER 0 40 i r I Valle/ 6rewe/ V /S, /1y Sa d-Cob6te_ 5 _ — _ End 04 bet y (no reAs4 1 6.1 V 8 JOB 140 . S I M LOCATION DRILL / S2 DRILLING CONTRACTOR SAMPLE HAMMER: WT A f Jll; I/ a .4r /t .•�r at' • SUBSURFACE SHEET" NO / OF Ja_ EXPLORATION LOG JOB TITLE RTw4J Prey c$.Su //,✓o7 5o. of rnrct FEATURE • COORDINATES C W t-s o DATE 6-f-99 ANGLE BEARING REF. EL. DATUM r. DRILLER ✓fl del V1 INSPECTOR DROP TYPE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEF€GJ APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING LOCATION AND AT THE DATF INDICATED. IT 18 NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. 133A H1d30 PERC -RATE ONIa -H )INflC -NO O■9-B 0 3W00 -O TUBE I SAMPLE NO. PENETRATION RESISTANCE (N)VALUE BLOW/ FT. % .1N31N00 3HfllsioW + ,' 10 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GROUNDWATER – — . LI ii% D \1 /1 , { r Valley Grade/ w /SIIY'y Sci 4 co CS an' e- as s 1) /c S - — End of horny (no re- C ,a') s SUBSURFACE BHEETO NO2 /3 EXPLORATION LOG JOB NO. 05 / M JOB TITLE Bruin/ Pines c Su l!, ✓an S D-r Maas LOCATION FEATURE COORDINATES Cr* /?9 .YID ' DATE X - / DRILL 7 S 7� ANGLE BEARING — —�$EF EL DATUM DRILLING CONTRACTOR DRILLER ��/«774(a PO INSPECTOR SAMPLE HAMMER: WT DROP TYPE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING LOCATION AND AT THE DATP INDICATED. IT 18 NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. 1334 H1d30 I PERC -RATE ONIa -H HNfDY.NS0 t OV8-8 m 31400 -3 TUBE SAMPLE NO. PENETRATION RESISTANCE (N)VALUE BLOW / FT. % '1N3LN00 BWLLS IOW 10 Lo- MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GROUNDWATER) t/ — 5 — — c) q Or Valle/ t whity sa,n1 y- cabb /e Caw,a as sa &e ''al ) _ — End o.c 130.4.7 crlo re A 4l ) JOB NO. 9 5 LOCATION DRILL 75 Z DRILLING CONTRACTOR SAMPLE HAMMER: WT SUBSURFACE BORING TT N— OF EXPLORATION TOG JOB TITLE 13TWA1 Pines 4- Stdhare4 .70. el Tucks FEATURE COORDINATES ) 30 450 DATE G - / - 89 ANGLE BEARING REF. EL. DATUM DRILLER P � n /la ✓'i INSPECTOR TYPE DROP NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING LOCATION AND AT THE DATF INDICATED. IT 18 NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMER. v 1 1334 H1d3O C 31Vd - 383d ONItl -H )INf1YJ -)10 OVS-B w 3U00 -0 TUBE SAMPLE NO. PENETRATION RESISTANCE 1 (N)VALUE BLOW / FT. % '1N31NOO 3NfllSIOW \0 G° MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GROUNDWATER — * 1 — • �h to 0401 5' L oawl 1.� /7iaLc o f c(o/ 2 - 5 — — • 1 ,Q`y 4,162 (Jo lley Grade/ to/Silty Sao v- cobli /e /' (Saone- a fa �n�'te / �� _ - — — - E. J o- Bo (.ro re Als a 1 ) Ion f. r4, pc 5/ 1 S between 5r4 /20 ^- + STa 1 2.6^' 8 DROP SUBSURFACE BORING NO., / EXPLORATION, LOG Job NO SFnl JOB TITLE 0 Pc/iv Pi 3-5ul6 ✓a, So. of regck LOCATION FEATURE COORDINATES 5Tq / Z3"' DATE - -1 -89 DRILL 752-- ANGLE BEARING REF. EL. DATUM DRILLING CONTRACTOR DRILLER lb r. 06'1 INSPECTOR SAMPLE HAMMER: WT TYPE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING LOCATION AND AT THE DATF INDICATED. IT 18 NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. 1333 H1d30 PERC -RATE ONIU -U NNf 43-WO ova-a m 3laO0 -0 "ON 3ldVIYS 38111 PENETRATION RESISTANCE 1 (N)VALUE BLOW / FT. % 'iN3 .N00 31:1111S I I kb to MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 1 GROUNDWATER T.) _ - — — �D y f �l� / valtei &ra ✓el w /silty 5a.�d W cobh oie. as .ia.+.plt IC i) CS w - — — Ent o-C Bo ley (no refN5a I R' 8 SUBSURFACE SHEET NO. 3 OF / 3 EXPLORATION LOG JOB TITLE FSTWN Piles *. Sv/ /,✓ah So. o1 77ac -k, JOB NO p 5 / Al LOCATION FEATURE COORDINATES 574 //7 *S0 :k DATE 6 -2 -89 DRILL 75Z.. ANGLE BEARING REF EL DATUM DRILLING CONTRACTOR DRILLER Mel Ila.^1 SAMPLE HAMMER: WT DROP INSPECTOR TYPE NOTE: THE LOG CF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEFEON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING LOCATION AND AT THE DATF INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. v 1334 111430 PERC -RATE i ONIU-8 NNfXIO -N3 t OV8-8 w 31400-3 TUBE SAMPLE NO. PENETRATION RESISTANCE (N)VALUE BLOW / FT. % '1N3.1140 0 3Nf11S10*1 I 10 L MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 1 GROUNDWATER - - 1 — — ..• X0.7 a` to Va/ 6 fa ✓d 41l5, /fy 5a4 ,r Co bs /e. l_'_a »,e- 4$ 54 p le4/ S — — — gmd o f Bari" [no rea6a/ 8 JOB NO U s l m LOCATION DRILL 7 5 DRILLING CONTRACTOR SAMPLE HAMMER: WT DROP 0 I rice c4.5 SUBSURFACE SHEETG 1402. / EXPLORATION LOG JOB TITLE 13T'atil P ie9 'Sall, Jan 50. FEATURE COORDINATES 5r4 /n "'' ?DATE 6 - 1 _97 ANGLE BEARING REF. EL. DATUM DRILLER Mr -C laawi INSPECTOR TYPE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT I8 NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. 1334 141430 PERC -RATE ONIH -H NNf110-)f0 OVS-8 m 31100-3 'ON 3ldfVS 38(11 PENETRATION RESISTANCE (N)VALUE BLOW/ FT. % '1H31H00 3Hf11S1011 `! EP MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GROUNDWATER — � o• � F r V Gra ✓e' 1.015,1t, see of w co b &1 L5ani6 as 5k #1) S - — Foci dT Oo/'n y (n o Y e 0 I 8 JOB NO. D S /41 LOCATION DRILL 7 r Z DRILLING CONTRACTOR SAMPLE HAMMER: WT SUBSURFACE BORIN SHEETG NO. 7 oF 1-3 EXPLORATION LOG JOB TITLE t3T1/4)41 tt.5"Il, m., Sn . o 4 ' Tracks FEATURE COORDINATES 574 /OO, 25 DATE ti -2 -»? ANGLE BEARING REF EL DATUM DRILLER mad fiat INSPECTOR TYPE DROP NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEF£ON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMER. 1334 H1430 I — 31V21 - 3d3d !�J ONIU —Li 2 S )INf O—NO t OW-9 co 3800-0 TUBE SAMPLE NO. PENETRATION RESISTANCE (N) VALUE BLOW/ FT. %'1N31N00 3 %USIOW \0 t MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GROUNDWATER — _ — ^ h s t° Jalley (o /ooc/ wJ5i / l y said + /tP LS 0.441e, 4s 5a,,nio% #1 _ _ _ En,' o Bor n ( ylo re.0 sa ;) 1l 8 JOB NO. 0 S on LOCATION DRILL 7 .5 2- DRILLING CONTRACTOR SAMPLE HAMMER: WT SUBSURFACE SHEET 1 oF 13 EXPLORATION LOG 408 TITLE Piro Al R ne, IF 5 / 5e . err Tr FEATURE - COORDINATES 5 rq 93 x 2 $ E DATE 6 - a _en ANGLE BEARING REF EL DATUM DRILLER me CnllaNi INSPECTOR TYPE DROP BORING NO NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN I£FCON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING LOCATION AND AT THE DATI INDICATED. IT I8 NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. `- 1334 H1d3O PERC -RATE ONIU -H NNf110-)40 OYS-S w 3H0O -3 ON 3ldWYS 35114► PENETRATION RESISTANCE (N)VALUE BLOW/ FT. % '1N31N0O 3linLLS IOW I,P MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 1 OROUNDWATERI 3 - ,h ti I� Silty Lo ans t /9ratie" 2 - - — h' e I f t I Va/ /ey Gra ae( W /S /fy5an �{ t o 6 ue. t5a.woe 0 5 56 m/'lf.�/ - - - - _ — - — - — - 5rd o '' pot tir Coo re.0 « f J o TE . r4 Parrs"' /ai $-: TK c. is b e*w te4 5 nt • . to S r 9/� S� 8 JOB NO 05 /M LOCATION DRILL 75 2 DRILLING CONTRACTOR SAMPLE HAMMER: WT SUBSURFACE SHEET 9 OF /. EXPLORATION LOG JOB TITLE nrctpti Pones ,r- .51411Ii41 50. o4 Tracks FEATURE COORDINATES 5r4 89 -- DATE 6 -Z'B"J ANGLE BEARING REF. EL. DATUM DRILLER Mc el / r"1 INSPECTOR TYPE DROP BORING NO. NOTE: THE LOG OF SLEBURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT 18 NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMER. Ltd 1334 H1d30 PERC -RATE ONIH -14 NNf1i0-W3 t OVS-8 m 3H00 -3 TUBE SAMPLE NO. PENETRATION RESISTANCE (N)VALUE BLOW / FT. % 1 1N31N00 I MILLSIOW 4 VD L O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 1 OROUNDWATERI • (5I c / j a ✓✓I e.. 0 5j 5a 0 "' / O it. 3 1 ` / Z — — � j / 1/a /lei Gravel W /s, ity scs cI te6ea ✓Y (Sa ne as Saw, I° / t , ) S _ - 4 saI / ��d 01" /3o/ , Ny Cno re / S JOB NO. QS i LOCATION DRILL 75 DRILLING CONTRACTOR SAMPLE HAMMER: WT SUBSURFACE BHEETG NO /0 OF A EXPLORATION LOG, JOB TITLE OrvA2 P? e, C I - ice r/, ✓ a-, SO. 04 tin-a& FEATURE COORDINATES fra 837' 7 5 DATE h -2 -R9 ANGLE BEARING REF. EL. DATUM DRILLER ntaft<.✓/ INSPECTOR TYPE DROP NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING LOCATION AND AT THE DATF INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMER. L' 1334 H1430 31Vd - Od3d �y DNIS -H DVS-B m 3!00-3 TUBE SAMPLE NO. PENETRATION RESISTANCE (N) VALUE BLOW/ FT. % '1N31N00 MAILSIOW LD MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 10ROUNDWATER - - 0 A 0. of 0IG • / / rY L cG.n w/ G la✓C' 5 l Sant G5 saw, pi` 3) 2 - — • to vv �, r va tie/ 4 5 f a 1 5 /'17 J ° Y - GobS�C — ErJ o4 Qo.;ny (re re-Cual ) JOB NO. 12 5/' "I LOCATION DRILL 7 S 2- DRILLING CONTRACTOR SAMPLE HAMMER: WT SUBSURFACE SHEET NO. /1 OF i 3 EXPLORATION LOG . JOB TITLE /3/ki� P,4 -' Su l/ /va %, o facts FEATURE COORDINATES 77 150 DATE h -2 -A4 ANGLE BEARING , REF EL DRILLER Me- 1 016x"" I INSPECTOR TYPE DROP DATUM NOTE: THE LOO OF 8IE&URFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEFEON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING LOCATION AND AT THE DATF INDICATED. IT 18 NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. J.334 H1d30 3111H ONIa -S )1Nf 4O-W3 t OVf}B co 3U00 -3 TUBE SAMPLE NO. PENETRATION RESISTANCE (N)VALUE BLOW/Ft % '1N31NO0 31:1111S IOW l IP MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GROUNDWATER V - - — — 0 \ M .( _ g) 1 D (/a /ley y rood w/51ft'y'adv.. (C a5 5aa n j tlk 7 ) _ _ - ,54 o-C )3, m (no re #'N ) S JOB NO. P5/ ✓✓) LOCATION DRILL 7 DRILLING CONTRACTOR SAMPLE HAMMER: WT SUBSURFACE SHEET NO / 2 OF /3 Prom LOG //,, JOB TITLE / rom Pan e, 'E £ /f i q 50. p F tracks FEATURE COORDINATES 579 7/ *ZS DATE A - Z - 99 ANGLE BEARING n REF EL DATUM DRILLER I1io(s 11A "1 INSPECTOR TYPE DROP NOTE; THE LOG OF SIEBURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. 1334 H1d30 PERC -RATE �( DNItl -H S NNRHO -)10 DV8-a co 3HOQ -3 TUBE SAMPLE NO. PENETRATION RESISTANCE (N) VALUE BLOW/ FT. % 3WLLSIOW \ tp MATERIAL DESCRIPTION I GROUNDWATER - _ - - e x �� QII Y y rove t4//5) /ty 504t Co�S�L° (Same a, 56 ,4 7 0/ e « i) S _ _ End o'P Do4. y (no re s41, s JOB NO. p S LOCATION DRILL 15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR SAMPLE HAMMER: WT JOB TITLE SUBSURFACE BHEET NO. /3 EXPLORATION LOG. / f/37 / .in 'r S4 //wan 5 o4 f /aG/- y FEATURE COORDINATES- 6 5 0 DATE 4-2 ANGLE BEARING FIEF EL DATUM DRILLER /nCreth 1 v✓I INSPECTOR DROP OF TYPE NOTE: THE LOG CF 8W$URFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEFCON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING LOCATION AND AT THE DATF INDICATED. IT 18 NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. 2735 No building structures Located in this area >` - 2 50' side yard setback _Proposed Restrictions to Lot 27 _SULLIVAN . PARK CENTER Spokane County, Washington l 0 d X1 a 0 Noyehicular access to flora road 200' p' ;-200' 100' « N Consultant: Wilsey and Ham r — •w ~r /of IS PS//A62 ^, .... •• * T t 1 Ii a f"f • ••C rV -4�. .41.•• ® . arrela wvl. rrI I t 1 iE i r . 1 1 J 41 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer DATE: TO: ATTENTION: CITY /STATE: FAX NUMBER: FROM: COUNTY FAX NO.: S re, c- Ie c( N. 811 Jefferson FACSIMILE COVER SHEET 4 5 - 2 Z 1 NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): V e r r S {2.1 / (509) 456 -4715 A DIVISION OF TILE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M.- Scott,,P.E., Director MESSAGE/SPECIAL INSTRUCTION: ,2. e o geg-n y -zer Please contact J ed- ry at (509) 456 -3600, should any problems occur with transmission or receipt of facsimile. Spokane, WA 99260 -0180 1509) 456 -3600 FAX 15091456-4715 I ) By //(. ASSIGNMENT For security purposes only, R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation, hereby assigns to SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, the following: U.S. Government Obligations, Saloman Government Backed Repurchase Agreement, or other investments as approved by the parties hereto, in the face amount of $1,906,470.00 and held in and by Seattle First National Bank, h. 74(fJ ie This Assignment is made as security for the full and faithful performance by R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. of the construction of certain roads, drainage swales, landscaping, sprinkler system and street lighting, as specified in the typical section and roadway improvement specifications for said subdivision, dated April 17, 1990 and on file in the Office of the County Engineer, and the landscape plans for said subdivision dated April 12, 1990, and on file in the Office of the County Planning Department. Any interest benefits accruing under said investment funds shall remain the property of R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. Said investment funds are to be released to R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. or any other party only with the prior written consent and agreement of Spokane County. PROVIDED, the undersigned does hereby authorize Seattle First National Bank to pay over to Spokane County all or a sufficient portion of the moneys in the investment funds referenced hereinabove upon written documentation being received from Spokane County indicating that the purposes for which the investment funds were assigned have not been fully and faithfully performed as required and a statement of that amount of money which the County deems necessary to complete such obligation. Upon receipt of such written documentation, R.A. Hanson Company hereby authorizes Seattle First National Bank to release to Spokane County that amount of money requested up to the maximum amount in,the investment funds account. PROVIDED, FURTHER, that R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. shall have the right to direct the investment of the funds which are subject to this Assignment, and, therefore, this Assignment shall be effective as to any such investment account Dated this [ ti day of May, 1990. SEATTLE FIRST NATIONNAL BANK iJ L4/11 BY Y l C Ott - Dated this 9 day of May, 1990. APPROVED AS TO FORM: SPOKANE COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. By Q1 . GC . / 04441-0(. R.A. Hanson - President. The undersigned beneficiary is a party to that certain Developer Agreement dated April 6, 1990, in which R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. obligated itself to Spokane County in the amount of $1,906,470.00 for the construction of certain improvements set forth in said Developer Agreement. The Developer Agreement was then secured by that certain Deed of Trust dated April 6, 1990, in which R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. is grantor and First American Title Insurance Company is trustee, filed for record on May 4, 1990, as Auditor's File No. 9005040326, and recorded. in Volume 1109 of Mortgages, at page 66, records of Spokane County, Washington. There was no promissory note executed by R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., and therefore no promissory note is being surrendered herewith. The obligations and indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust now having been fully secured by other security, the Deed of Trust is herewith surrendered to you for cancellation and reconveyance. You are therefore requested, upon payment of all sums owing to you, to reconvey without warranty, to the person(s) entitled thereto, the right, title and interest now held by you thereunder. ATTEST. REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEYANCE Dated this ZZ day of May, 1990. illiam E. Donahue By lerk of Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: Spokane County Prosecutor's Office ch � � /C � ^ C eputy Mi 1 Dempsey - Approved pursuant 'to Resolution 90 -0479 SPOKANE COUNTY A �4 d. Patricia A. Mummey - Chairman Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington * BAN f FORM 5091 12/88 ADMINISTRATOR: LORI MONTOYA HANSON /PRICE IMPROVEMENT FUND ESCROW ACCOUNT • ACCOUNT NO. 724 - 336175 mrpicn JUN 8 1990 PROSECUTiNG ATTORNEY SPOKANE COUNTY RECEIVED JUN 1 1 1990 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER MIKE DEMPSEY - DEPUTY SPOKANE COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE W. 1100 MALLON - PUBLIC SAFETY BLG SPOKANE, WA 99260 (1.1SEAFIRST BANK FORM 5091 12/88 HANSON /PRICE IMPROVEMENT FUND ESCROW ACCOUNT CASH STATEMENT COVERING APRIL 30, 1990 TO MAY 31, 1990 SUMMARY OF INCOME CASH ACCOUNT YOUR LAST STATEMENT SHOWED INCOME CASH ON HAND OF INCOME CASH RECEIVED SINCE THEN WAS AND DISBURSEMENTS WERE MADE IN THE AMOUNT OF LEAVING INCOME CASH ON HAND OF SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL CASH ACCOUNT YOUR LAST STATEMENT SHOWED PRINCIPAL CASH ON HAND OF PRINCIPAL CASH RECEIVED SINCE THEN WAS AND DISBURSEMENTS WERE MADE IN THE AMOUNT OF LEAVING PRINCIPAL CASH ON HAND OF ACCOUNT NO. /Z4 - 3361/D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ 0.00 2,747,392.00 - 2,747,391.34 $ 0.66 [ii SEA FIRSTBA NM DATE 4/30/90 C 39/90 05/22/90 05/22/90 FORM 5091 12/88 ACTIVITY BALANCES CARRIED FORWARD CASH RECEIPT RECEIVED BY WIRE FROM SEQ #1713 - WEST ONE 05/10/90 PURCHASED 2,543,530 UNITS OF ACM SALOMON REPO US TSY SECURITIES TRADE DATE 5/10/90 SOLD 203,862 UNITS OF ACM SALOMON REPO US TSY SECURITIES TRADE DATE 5/22/90 CASH DISBURSEMENT PAID TO 13853 -601 R.A. HANSON CO, INC. TRANS TO SFNB CHECKING ACCT PROCEEDS FROM ESCROW _,31/90 BALANCES CARRIED FORWARD HANSON /PRICE IMPROVEMENT FUND ESCROW ACCOUNT $0.00 $0.00 2,543,530.00 ACCOUNT NO. PAGE NO. 724 - 336175 1 INCOME CASH PRINCIPAL CASH BOOK VALUE $0.00 2,543,530.00- 2,543,530.00 203,862.00 203,862.00 - 203,861.34- $0.00 $0.66 $2,339,668.00 ` HANSON /PRICE IMPROVEMENT FUND SEA IFL9TBANK ��' ESCROW ACCOUNT FORM 5091 12/88 SUMMARY OF ASSETS OTHER THAN CASH MAY 31, 1990 CURRENT ACCOUNT ASSETS AT CARRYING VALUE ARE: CASH EQUIVALENTS 2,339,668.00 TOTAL 2,339,668.00 ACCOUNT NO. 724- 336175 �11 ESCROW /ACIOE IMPROVEMENT FUND SE4FIRSTBANK ESCROW ACCOUNT 2,339,668 ACM SALOMON REPO US TSY SECURITIES AVERAGE MONTHLY YIELD: 8.119450 FORM 5091 12/88 UNITS DESCRIPTION OF INVESTMENTS CASH EQUIVALENTS TOTAL CASH'EQUIVALENTS INVESTMENT INVENTORY MAY 31, 1990 TOTAL INVESTMENTS CARRYING VALUE 2,339,668.00 2,339,668.00 2,339,668.00 ACCOUNT NO. b / 90 0479 4 . e 'l a.rb o 0 r y r p "�' Tom+ D r'e-w 1.S tc e ,• , /i to r ne f 'r /1/44, IA.,. $- 7/ -90 ft 90ij50.40326 DEED OF TRUST 45I32.ga4D '45113. SDZ 45\\•. g o31 M50 cono VOL . ijO9PAHE '66 This Deed of Trust made this 6th day of April, 1990, by •and, between GRANTOR, whose name and address is R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., P.O. Box 7400, Spokane, Washington 99207, a corporation; TRUSTEE, whose name and address is First American Title Insurance Company, W. 704 First Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99204; and SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of_ Washington, BENEFICIARY, whose address is West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, Washington, to -wit: Grantor hereby bargains, sells and conveys to Trustee, in trust, with power of sale the following described real property in Spokane County, Washington: SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE. The property which is the subject of this Deed of Trust is not used principally for agricultural or farming purposes. This deed is for the purpose of securing the obligation of the Grantor herein not to sell, convey or apply for building permits on any lot assigned herein until the Grantor constructs all roads, with landscaped medians, drainage structures and facilities, sidewalks, monuments, curbs, street lights, sprinkler system, and other facilities in accordance with the approved plans on file in the Spokane County Engineer's office. These plans are designed to meet Spokane County Standards adopted in Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, and Conditions of Approval in the Findings and Order for PE- 1504 -85 and zone change ZE- 180 -78. The Grantor agrees to complete all above - mentioned improvements by May 1, 1992. In the event these improvements are not completed by the above - mentioned date, the Grantor is considered to have defaulted on the Deed of Trust and Spokane County may at any time thereafter proceed as outlined hereafter. The Spokane County Engineer's estimate for these improvements is $1,906,470.00. It is further understood that this Deed of Trust is for the actual cost of improvements at the time they are made, which cost may exceed the Spokane County Engineer's estimate. of 12 (1) (5) -2- vot. .1 U 9 pa6E 67 To protect the security of this Deed of Trust, Grantor covenants and agrees: To keep the property in good condition and repair; to permit no waste thereof; and to comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, covenants, conditions and restrictions affecting the property. (2) To pay before delinquent all lawful taxes and assessments against the property; to keep the property free and clear of all other charges, liens or encumbrances impairing the security of this Deed of Trust. (3) To defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security hereof or the rights or powers of Beneficiary or Trustee, and to pay all costs and expenses, including costs of title - search and attorney's fees in a reasonable amount, in any such action or proceeding and in any suit brought by Beneficiary to foreclose this Deed of Trust. (4) To pay all costs, fees and expenses in connection with this Deed of Trust, including the expenses of Trustee, incurred in forcing the obligations secured hereby and the Trustee's and attorney's fees actually incurred as provided by statute. Should the Grantor fail to pay when due any taxes, assessments, liens, encumbrances or other charges against the property hereinabove described, Beneficiary may pay the same, and the amounts so paid, with interest at a rate percent, shall be added to become a part of the debts secured by this Deed of Trust. It is mutually agreed that: A. RECONVEYANCES: (1) Conditions for Reconveyance. Grantor shall have the right to have any lot or lots within the subdivision reconveyed. The conditions precedent to said reconveyance are: _ (a) No notice of default remains uncured; (b) Grantor shall be entitled to said reconveyance on all or a portion of the lots within the subdivision upon: i. Construction by the Grantor of all roads within the fina'. plat to the standards required of the Grantor by the Beneficiary in accordance with such final plat and acceptance of said construction by the Beneficiary; or ii. Construction by the Grantor of a portion of the roads within the final plat to the standards required of the Grantor by the Beneficiary in accordance with such final flow within the approved plat; or VOL _ iO D PAGE 6 plat and acceptance of said construction by the Benefi- ciary; provided, however, the Beneficiary retains the exclusive authority to determine whether or not to accept any portion of the roads based in part upon the traffic iii. Submittal by the Grantor and acceptance by the Beneficiary of acceptable guarantees to construct all or a portion of the roads within the final plat to the standards submitted to the Grantor by the Beneficiary in accordance with such final plat. Such guarantees may include performance bonds, loan assignments or assignments of savings accounts; provided, however, a submittal to the Beneficiary of guarantees for less than all the roads in the plat /must be accompanied by a written development proposal indicating those lots within the approved plat which will be sold as a result of a partial reconveyance. The development proposal must be approved in writing by the Beneficiary prior to the acceptance of the guarantee and partial reconveyance. (2) Grantor shall pay for ALL costs and fees in preparation of full or partial reconveyances. (a) Subordination to Third Party Vendees. Beneficiary agrees that in the ,event of foreclosure of Grantor's interest herein, Beneficiary shall reconvey to Vendees of the Grantor upon performance by said Vendees to Beneficiary as hereinbefore stated. (3) Cooperation. Each of the parties hereto, forthwith, and on the request of the other, shall execute and deliver such documents and take such action as may be reasonably required in order to carry out the intent and purposes of this Deed of Trust. (4) Default. Upon default by the Grantor(s) in the performance of any agreement contained herein, all sums secured hereby shall immediately become due and payable at the option of Beneficiary. In such event and upon written request of the Beneficiary, the Trustee shall sell the trust property in accordance with the Deed of Trust Act of the State of Washington, and public auction to the highest bidder. Any person except Trustee may bid at the Trustee's sale. The Trustee shall apply the proceeds of the same as follows: -3- (a) To the expense of sale, including reasonable Trustee's and attorney's fees; (b) To the obligations secured by this Deed of Trust; (c) The surplus, if any, shall be distributed to the persons entitled thereto. - (5) Trustee shall deliver to the Purchaser at the sale, its deed without warranty, which shall convey to the Purchaser the interest in the property which Grantor had, or had the power to convey, at the time of his execution of this Deed of Trust, and such as he may have acquired thereafter. The Trustee's deed shall recite the facts shown that sale-was conducted in compliance with all the requirements of law and of this Deed of Trust, which recital shall be prima facie evidence of such compliance and conclusive evidence thereof in favor of bona fide purchasers and encumbrances for value. (6) The power of sale conferred by this Deed of Trust and by the Deed of Trust Act in the State of Washington, is not an exclusive remedy; Beneficiary may cause this Deed of Trust to be foreclosed as a mortgage. ( In the event of the death, incapacity or disability or resignation gf Trustee, Beneficiary may appoint in writing a Successor Trustee, and upon the recording of such appointment in the mortgage records of the county in which this Deed of Trust is recorded, the Successor Trustee shall be vested with all powers of the original Trustee. The Trustee is not obligated to notify any party hereto of pending sale under any Deed of Trust or of any action or proceeding in which the Grantor, Trustee or Beneficiary shall be a party, unless such action or proceeding is brought by Trustee. (8) This Deed of Trust applies, inures to the benefit of, and is binding not only on the parties hereto, but their heirs, devisees, legatees, administrators, executives, successors and assigns. ATTEST* 'ILLIAM E. 'O NAHUE CLERK OF BOA RD Pe 4 ifk‘2i-LAs—L.1.411 e p u t y -4- VOL. 1109PAGE 6J GRANTOR R.A. � Hanson Company, Inc. By: (1 • /1f-4 R.A. Hanson - President SPOKANE COUNTY Chairman, Boar of Co /I Commissioners of Spokane V County, Washington APPROVED AS TO FORM: SPOKANE COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE / By: // //(2.4 r STATE OF WASHINGTON County of Spokane TRUSTEE: Received this On this day personally appeared before me VOL 110 9 PAGE 70 itici A• ,*te m ey known to me to be the individual(s) described in and ho executed the within and fore •. g instrument and acknowledged that he ® they signed the same as his their free and voluntary act and deed fo e uses and purposes therein sta ed. '. " ",GIVEN UNDER MY HAND and affixed_ my official s 1 this et/ day o f 4 l P r day of , 19 Notary Public a and for the State of Washington, residing at Spo ane My commission expires: By: Title: STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of Spokane On this l " day of April, 1990, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared R.A. Hanson, to me known to be the President of R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said in- strument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the . uses and .purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the ay and y•ar first above written. 0347o s e w M .041-11 - ip 4 , ` 'oF *As • :it1 NOTAR`WITUBLIC ", e'., to My Appointment Expires: St 1 s' 4 " c n✓ s + li b \ tea &-. > -5- That portion of Sections 11 as follows: RECEIVE') FILED OR RE CORDED REQUEST OOF HAY q 3 43 PM . A,IUE .currou sror.;.r-, cowl &X, It }, EXHIBIT "A" VOL. 110 9 PAGE 71 13 and 14, T. 25 N. R. 44 E.N.N. described Begin at the NW corner of said Section 13: thence S 02 along the West line of said Section 13, 60.72'feet.to the True Point of Beginning.; thence S 69 81.37 feet to the Beginning of a nontangent curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 40.00 feet and a radial bearing of 9� 8 "W; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 71 06 35 beginning arc distance of 49.64 feet; thence S 73 °E 384.82 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 1442.00 feet; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 12 an arc distance of 309.04 feet; thence 3 as 21'47•W radial to said curve 92.0o teen thence S 37'11'15 "W 126.03 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 633.00 feet and a radial bearing of N38 "E, said point being on the Northerly R/W of the E -NS ramp for Interstate 90 (I -90) at Sullivan Road; thence Westerly through a central angle of '41 an arc distance of 454.98 feet; thence S 87 "W, along said. Northerly R/W 200.29 feet to the line between said Sections 13 i 14; thence Continuing S 87 "W along the Northerly R/W of the NS -W ramp for I -90 at Sullivan Road, 1048.61 feet to the Northerly R/W of said I -90; thence N. 77 along said Northerly line, 216.86 feet; thence N 76'55'02.4, along said Northerly line, 1550.20 feet: thence N 74 along said bortherly.line,,,620,00 feet; thence N 56'26'27 "W 7741.50 feet; thence N 06'2$'1s"W 950.00 feet to a point a on curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6684.56 feet and a radial bearing of S 06 "E, said point being on the Southerly R/W of the Union Pacific: Railroad; thence Easterly, along said R/W, through a central angle of 11 an arc distance of 1316.56 feet; thence N 72 along said R/W 551.72 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 964.95 feet and a radial bearing of S 53 "W, said point being on the Southwesterly line of the State Parks Department Property as shown on .. kecord.of Survey filed in Survey book 41 page 84; the next 6 courses are alonq said Southwesterly line, thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 9 , an arc distance of . 159.61 feet; thence 3 45 912.03 feet to the beginning of a. curve concave to the Northeast with a radius. of 2874.80 feet; thence' Southeasterly through a central angle of 11 • an arc distance of 592.48 feet; thence 9 57'26'08•E 588.09 feet:thence S 32 "W 10.00 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave to the Northeast with radius of 5749.58 feet and a • radial bearing of S 32 "W; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 5 ",an arc distance of 601.43 feet to the Westerly R/W of Sullivan Road; thence S 03 "E, along said Westerly R/W, 164.40 feet' thence S 02 "E, along said Westerly R/W, 37.28 feet: thence S 69 57.'29 "E 59.67 feet to the True P.O.B. EXCEPT State Right of Way. .$ituata'in the County of Spokane, Stets of Washington. ; 30 0479 NO. BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR SPOKANE COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF FILING THE FINAL PLAT OF ) SULLIVAN PARK CENTER, FILE NO. PE- 1504 -85 ) AND ZONE CHANGE FROM RESTRICTED ) INDUSTRIAL (RI) TO COMMUNITY BUSINESS ) RESOLUTION (B -2) AND REGIONALBUSINESS (B -3), FILE NO. ) ZE- 180-78 IN SECTIONS 11, 13 & 14, TOWNSHIP ) 25 NORTH, RANGE 44 EWM, SPOKANE COUNTY ) WASHINGTON ) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, that the Final Plat of Sullivan Park Center that portion of Sections 11, 13 and 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington, described as follows, with a more precise description located in the plat dedication: That portion of SECTIONS 11, 13 AND 14, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST, W.M., in Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Begin at the Northwest corner of said Section 13; thence South 02 ° 46'23" East, along the West line of said Section 13, 60.72 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 69 ° 57'29" East 81.37 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 40.00 feet and a radial bearing of South 87 ° 13'37" West; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 71 ° 06'35 ", an arc distance of 49.64 feet; thence South 73 °52'58" East 384.82 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 1442.00 feet; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 12 ° 16'45 ", an arc distance of 309.04 feet; thence South 28 ° 23'47" West radial to said curve 92.00 feet; thence South 37 ° 11'15" West 126.03 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 633.00 feet and a radial bearing of North 38 ° 25'17" East, said point being on the Northerly R/W of the E -NS ramp for Interstate 90 (I -90) at Sullivan Road; thence Westerly through a central angle of 41 ° 10'58" an arc distance of 454.98 feet; thence South 87 ° 14'19" West, along said Northerly R/W 200.29 feet to the line between said Sections 13 and 14; thence continuing South 87 °14'19" West along the Northerly R/W of the NS -W ramp for I -90 at Sullivan Road, 1048.61 feet to the Northerly R/W of said I -90; thence North 77 ° 54'39" West, along said Northerly line, 216.86 feet; thence North 76 ° 55'02" West, along said Northerly line, 1550.20 feet; thence North 76 °10'41" West, along said Northerly line, 620.00 feet; thence North 56 ° 26'27" West 778.50 feet; thence North 06 ° 28'18" West 950.00 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6684.56 feet and a radial bearing of South 06 ° 28'18" East, said point being on the Southerly R/W of the Union Pacific Railroad; thence Easterly, along said R /W, through a central angle of 11 ° 17'05" an arc distance of 1316.56 feet; thence North 72 ° 14'37" East, along said R/W 551.72 feet to-a point on a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 964.95 feet and a radial bearing of South 53 ° 51'00" West, said point being on the Southwesterly line of the State Parks Department Property as shown on Record of Survey filed in Survey Book 41 Page 84; the next 6 courses are along said Southwesterly line; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 9 ° 28'38 ", an arc distance of 159.61 feet; thence South 45 ° 37'38" East 912.03 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 2874.80 feet; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 11 ° 48'30 ", an arc distance of 592.48 feet; thence South 57 ° 26'08" East 588.09 feet; thence South 32 ° 33'52" West 10.00 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave to the Northeast with radius of 5749.58 feet and a radial bearing of South 32 ° 33'52" West; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 5 ° 59'36 ", an arc distance of 601.43 feet to the Westerly R/W of Sullivan Road; thence South 03 ° 24'03" East, along said Westerly R /W, 164.40 feet; thence South 02 °46'23" East, along said Westerly R /W, 37.28 feet; thence South 69 ° 57'29" East 59.67 feet to the True Point of Beginning. EXCEPT State Right of Way. NO. 90 0479 FINAL PLAT RESOLUTION UPON THE RECOMMENDATION of the Spokane County Planning Department, the final plat is approved with the exception that the public rights of way dedicated in this plat will not be established for maintenance purposes until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a separate resolution of the Board of County Commissioners. ADDITIONALLY, until the final plat document is filed in the Spokane County Auditor's Office, this subdivision has only preliminary plat status and is subject to expiration and null and void status if not periodically granted an extension of time consistent with the policies and procedures of the Planning Department. '/ PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS Z7 DAY OF ,l.C'� 1990 MO REV 1/90 mo BOA ST: 2IAM E. DO � rk of the Board, By' 'a2 1 - .., A, Rosanne Montague, Deputy Cle FILE NO. PE- 1504 -85 PAGE NO. 2 i Patricia A. VE AP Steven` asson OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON DEVELOPER AGREEMENT RECEIVED. ADR 1 1 1990 Cc ulaY kinteripg This Agreement is made and entered into this 6th day of April, 1990, by and between R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer" and SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at W. 1116 Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as the "County ", jointly referred to as the "Parties ", W I T N E S S E T H : WHEREAS, Developer received preliminary plat approval from the County for Sullivan Park Center, PE- 1504 -85, ZE- 180 -78, on March 25, 1986, and WHEREAS, Developer wishes to obtain approval of Final Plat from the County, and WHEREAS, the County has required, as a Condition of Approval of Final Plat, that Developer construct certain improvements in the form of roads, drainage swales, landscaping, sprinkler system, and lighting, all pursuant to that certain Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Planning Report dated October 25, 1985, and WHEREAS, it is required that Developer post a bond or provide other security for the construction of said improvements before the Final Plat will be approved, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the covenants made hereinafter and the mutual benefits to be derived by the Parties hereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. Upon execution of this Agreement, Developer shall grant a deed of trust to County of all the property contained within the proposed Final Plat. The grant of said deed of trust to County shall be made for the purposes of pledging said real estate to County as security for the full performance by Developer of the construction of those improvements required in the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Planning Report Conditions of Approval dated October 24, 1985. It is acknowledged and understood between the parties hereto that -1- • Developer intends to sell approximately 82 acres of the property contained within the Final Plat to Price Development Company, a Utah corporation, within fifteen (15) days of the filing of the Final Plat. Developer is to receive a cash sum of money from Price Development Company as and for the purchase of said property. It is agreed between Developer and County that at such time that Developer receives cash proceeds from the sale to Price Development Company, then Developer may, at Developer's option, deposit $1,967,802.50 into a savings certificate and /or bank savings account as security for the cost of the construction of roads, drainage swales, landscaping, lighting and sprinkler system as required in the aforementioned Conditions of Approval. In the alternative, Developer may obtain a bond or letter of credit, either of which must be first approved by County, in such amounts as to adequately collateralize Developer's obligations for the aforementioned improvements. At such time as $1,967,803.00 is deposited as set forth above, or when Developer has obtained a bond or letter of credit acceptable to County, then County will reconvey and release its deed of trust in lieu thereof. 2. In the event that Developer chooses to use the cash sale proceeds as security, then Developer agrees to execute assignment agreements in a form acceptable to the County for the purpose of substituting the cash collateral for the aforementioned deed of trust. Similarly, any bond or letter of credit pledged by Developer, as security for the required improvements, must first be approved by County before County will be required to release its deed of trust. 3. County agrees that Developer shall be entitled to all interest earned on the escrowed funds, which interest shall be paid to Developer at Developer's discretion. County agrees that as the improvements are constructed, County may reduce the amount of the security held by County at the discretion of County. Any discretionary reductions in the amount of security shall be based upon the County Engineer's estimate of costs to complete the improvements required of Developer. 4. The initial amount of $1,967,803.00, which is to secure the performance of Developer, includes $267,803.00, which is the amount that the Spokane County Planning Department has required as security for the construction of landscaping and irrigation in the landscaped median in Indiana Avenue and the two parcels of land which will be deeded to the State of Washington for the Sullivan Road Interchange. The $267,803.00 has been computed by figuring the total square footage of the median in Indiana Avenue —2— (71,250 sq. ft.) and the square footage in the property to be deeded to the State of Washington (81,780 sq. ft) at $1.75 per square foot. These computations do not make any allowance for turn -out lanes on Indiana Avenue. It is therefore agreed that the total security amount of $1,967,803.00 will be adjusted at such time that the final turn -out lane requirements are determined. It is also agreed and understood that although County will require a bond or other security for all of the landscaping, County will permit Developer to construct only that portion of the landscaped median in Indiana Avenue which lies adjacent to that portion of the Final Plat for Sullivan Park Center which is being sold by Developer to Price Development Company. At such time that improvements are constructed on other portions of the property covered in the Plat, then the landscaping shall be completed in that portion of Indiana Avenue abutting these properties before occupancy permits for these properties will issued. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above - written. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE, Clerk of the Board By Deputy Clerk -3- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY By By By By Patricia Mummey - Chairman Steven Hasson John McBride DEVELOPER: R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. R.A. Hanson - President IN THE MATTER OF ;ANE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPART?' T Spokane County, Washington RIGHT OF WAY DEED Indiana Avenue , No. 280 / KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that R. A. Hanson and Company, Inc., and also • The Whitworth Foundation, a Non - Profit Washington Corporation of the County of Spokane, in the State of Washington, for and in consideration of Mutual. Benefits, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents do grant, bargain, sell and convey unto said Spokane County the following described parcel of land situated in Spokane County in the State of Washington to wit: A strip of land over a portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 11 and the Southeast quarter of Section 10, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., in Spokane County, Washington, the center line of which is described as follows: Begin at the Northeast corner of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M.; thence South 02 ° 46'23" East along the East line of said Section, 140.61 feet to the centerline of proposed Indiana Avenue; thence North 81 ° 15'36" West 692.40 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 955.00 feet; thence Northwesterly through a central angle of 57 ° 15'36" an arc distance of 954.40 feet; thence North 24 ° 00'00" West 220.00 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 955.00 feet; thence Northwesterly through a central angle of 29 ° 07'01 ", an arc distance of 485.32; thence North 53 ° 07'01" West 334.35 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 1500.00 feet; thence Northwesterly through a central angle of 50 ° 13'37 ", an arc distance of 1314.94 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6731.56 feet; thence Westerly through a central angle of 06 ° 52'20 ", an arc distance of 807.40 feet to the True Point of Beginning at which the right of way North of the centerline is 47.00 feet and South of the centerline is 37.00 feet, said point being the Westerly line of the proposed plat of Sullivan Park Center; thence continuing Westerly, along said curve, through a central angle of 2 ° 39'55 ", an arc distance of 313.14 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the Southeast with a radius of 1500.00 feet, at said point the right of way North of the centerline changes from 47.00 feet to 37.00 feet; thence Southwesterly through a central angle of 20 ° 09'40 ", an arc distance of 527.82 feet to the beginning of .a reverse curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 1500.00 feet; thence Southwesterly through a central angle of 21 ° 20'29 ", an arc distance of 558.72 feet to a point 47.00 feet North of the South line of the North half of the Southeast quarter of said Section 10, at said point the right of way South of the centerline changes from 37.00 feet to 47.00 feet; thence South 87 ° 22'26" West, parallel with said South line 2188.94 feet to the East line of Shannon Avenue (No. 280) and the end of said described centerline. The side line of said described right of way to be extended or shortened to meet said East line. 10 & Located in Section 11 Township 25 North. Range 44 East. W.M. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same. unto the said Spokane County for the.purposes of a public road forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hand(s) and seal(s) this /day of . 19 . R.A. HANSON AND COMPANY, INC. Raymond A. Hanson, President. Lois J. Hanson, Secretary DEED OF TRUST i This Deed of Trust made this P day of April , 1990 , by and between GRANTOR, whose name and address is R.A. Hanson Company. Inc P.O. Box 7400, Spokane, WA 99207 ; a corporation, TRUSTEE, whose name and First American Title Insurance Company address is W. 704 First Avenue, Spokane, WA 99204 and SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Washington, Beneficiary, whose address is West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, Washington, to -wit:. Grantor hereby bargains, sells and conveys to Trustee, in trust, with power of sale the following described real property in Spokane County, Washington: SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE The property which is the subject of this Deed of Trust is not used principally for agricultural or farming purposes. This deed is for the purpose of securing the obligation of the Grantor herein under that certain Developer Agreement of even date, under the terms of which Grantor has agreed to construct all roads, age such n facilities, sidewalks, t r .b f, monuments, curbs and other facilities in accordance with the approve plans on file in the Spokane County Engineer's office. These plans are designed to meet Spokane County Standards adopted in Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, and Conditions of Approval in the Findings and Order for PE- 1504 -85 and zone change ZE- 180 -78 The Grantor agrees to complete a and above - mentioned improvements by In the event e these improvements are not completed by the above - mentioned date, the Grantor is considered to have defaulted on the Deed of Trust and Spokane County may at any time thereafter proceed as outlined hereafter. The Spokane / County Engineer's estimate for these improvements is $ . It is further understood that this Deed of Trust is for the actual cost of improvements at the time they are made, which cost may exceed the Spokane County Engineer's estimate. eg2teca £ o ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW Mr. Steve Horobiowski Spokane County Planning Dept. Broadway Center Bldg. N. 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 -0180 Mr. Gary Nelson ✓ Spokane County Engineers Spokane County Public Works N. 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 -0180 Mr. Michael G. Dempsey Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney -Civil Division W. 1115 Broadway Spokane, Washington 99260 Gentlemen: Re: Sullivan Park Enclosed please find a copy of a second draft of a Developer Agreement. I have highlighted the changes to the first draft for your review. Basically, we feel it is important to acknowledge that the monies being escrowed for the improvements are subject to withdrawal for payment of construction of said improvements. I have also specifically listed the improvements, and per my conversation with Jerry Symmes this date, I have also left a blank for the insertion of a dollar amount for these improvements. Jerry also indicated that the County has a form deed of trust which we will use in lieu of the deed of trust form that I have previously submitted for your review. Please advise as to your comments on the Developer Agreement at your earliest convenience. Thank you. DMB /slm Enclosure cc: R.A. Hanson Company Simpson Engineers April 5, 1990 Very DR ^ . BODKER Attorney at Law HAND DELIVERED s S. 1401 GRAND BLVD.. SUITE 203 NORTH J�eatane. fon cg<P90,9 (509) 456 -5100 FAX: (509) 456 -5114 DEVELOPER AGREEMENT FOR DISCU ON PURPOSES GNii DATE I DRAFT NO.�.___ This Agreement is made and entered into this day of April, 1990, by and between R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer" and SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at W. 1116 Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as the "County ", jointly referred to as the "Parties ", W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Developer received preliminary plat approval from the County for Sullivan Park Center, PE- 1504 -85, ZE- 180 -78, on March 25, 1986, and WHEREAS, Developer wishes to obtain approval of Final Plat from the County, and WHEREAS, the County has required, as a Condition of Approval of Final Plat, that Developer construct certain improvements in the form of roads,4landscaping, sprinkler system, and lighting, all pursuant to that certain Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Planning Report dated October 25, 1985, and WHEREAS, it is required that Developer post a bond or provide other security for the construction of said improvements before the Final Plat will be approved, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the covenants made hereinafter and the mutual benefits to be derived by the Parties hereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. Developer shall grant a deed of trust to the County of all the property contained within the proposed Final Plat. The grant of said deed of trust to the County shall be made for the purposes of pledging said real estate to the County as security for the full performance by Developer of the construction of those improvements required in the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Planning Report Conditions of Approval dated October 24, 1985. It is acknowledged and understood between the — parties hereto that Developer intends to sell approximately 82 acres of the property contained within the Final Plat to Price Development Company, a Utah corporation, within fifteen (15) days of the filing of the Final Plat. Developer is to receive a cash sum of money from Price Development Company as and for the purchase of said property. It is therefore agreed between Developer and the County that at such time that Developer receives cash proceeds from said sale, then Developer agrees to deposit $ into a savings certificate and /or bank savings account to cover the cost of the construction of roads, landscaping, lighting and sprinkler system as required in the aforementioned Conditions of Approval. As such time as $ are deposited as set forth above, then the County will reconvey and release its deed of trust and the County will accept an assignment from Developer of said funds. Said assignment to the County by Developer of the savings certificate and /or cash funds shall then represent full and adequate security for the construction improvements required of Developer in lieu of a bond therefore. 2. Developer agrees to execute assignment agreements in a form acceptable to,the County for the purpose of substituting the cash collateral for the aforementioned deed of trust. 3. County agrees that Developer shall be entitled to all interest earned on the escrowed funds, which interest shall be added to the principal sums in escrow and utilized by Developer in constructing the above - referenced improvements. County agrees that as the improvements are constructed, the progress payments for same shall be released from escrow and paid to the contractor performing such work. 4. County agrees that the $ comprised of the following amounts: - Road (Indiana Avenue) - $ Landscaping _ $ Lighting _ $ Sprinkler System $ -2- set forth herein is County further agrees that at such time as actual bids from contractors are received for construction of the above - referenced improvements, then the $ shall be reduced by the difference between the actual bid from a bonded contractor and the amount set forth above for each of the specific improvements. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above - written. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE, 4 Clerk of the Board By Deputy Clerk -3- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY By By By By Patricia Mummey - Chairman Steven Hasson John McBride DEVELOPER: R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. R.A. Hanson - President ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW Mr. Steve Horobiowski Spokane County Planning Dept. Broadway Center Bldg. N. 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 -0180 Mr. Gary Nelson Spokane County Engineers Spokane County Public Works N. 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 -0180 Mr. Michael G. Dempsey Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney -Civil Division W. 1115 Broadway Spokane, Washington 99260 Gentlemen: Re: Sullivan Park April 3, 1990 5. 1401 GRAND BLVD.. SUITE 203 NORTH 15061456-5100 FAX: (509) 466 -6114 RECEWED APR 0 41990 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Enclosed please find a copy of a Developer Agreement which I have drafted pursuant to our discussions last month. Price Development Company has indicated that they cannot place the purchase money funds into an escrow before closing, so I have drafted the Agreement to provide for interim security in the form of a deed of trust in favor of Spokane County, pending the close of sale to Price, at which time a portion of the cash proceeds will be used as security for the improvements to be constructed by R.A. Hanson Company. Jim Legat has informed me that since the proposed sewer will not be a public sewer, his office will not require that money be escrowed or a bond posted for these improvements. Do any of you feel that I should specifically list the improvements which are to be secured by the deed of trust? Steve Horobiowski Gary Nelson Michael Dempsey April 3, 1990 Page Two I would appreciate hearing from each of you as soon as possible regarding any comments that you may have regarding this matter, and I would also like to thank each of you for your continuing patience and assistance. DMB /slm Enclosure cc: R.A. Hanson Company Simpson Engineers Very t�Y/uly yoSrfs DREW M. BODKER Attorney at Law i DEVELOPER AGREEMENT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES t DATE ' 5€ % 2-9 ° DRAFT NO. This Agreement is made and entered into this day of April, 1990, by and between R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Developer" and SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at W. 1116 Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as the "County ", jointly referred to as the "Parties ", W I T N E S S E T H : WHEREAS, Developer received preliminary plat approval from the County for Sullivan Park Center, PE- 1504 -85, ZE- 180 -78, on March 25, 1986, and WHEREAS, Developer wishes to obtain approval of Final Plat from the County, and • WHEREAS, the County has required, as a Condition of Approval of Final Plat, that Developer construct certain improvements in the form of roads, sewer, landscaping, lighting, etc., all pursuant to that certain Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Planning Report dated October 25, 1985, and WHEREAS, it is required that Developer post a bond or provide other security for the construction of said improvements before the Final Plat will be approved, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the covenants made hereinafter and the mutual benefits to be derived by the Parties hereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. Developer shall grant a deed of trust to the County of all the property contained within the proposed Final Plat. The grant of said deed of trust to the County shall be made for the purposes of pledging said real estate to the County as security for the full performance by Developer of the construction of those improvements required in the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee Planning Report Conditions of Approval dated October 24, 1985. It is acknowledged and understood between the parties hereto that Developer intends to sell approximately 82 acres of the property contained within the Final Plat to Price Development Company, a Utah corporation, within fifteen (15) days of the filing of the Final Plat. Developer is to receive a cash sum of money from Price Development Company as and for the purchase of said property. It is therefore agreed between Developer and the County that at such time that Developer —1— receives cash proceeds in a sufficient sum to adequately cover the cost of the construction of all required improvements as set . forth in the aforementioned Conditions of Approval, then at that i time the County will reconvey and release its deed of trust and the County will accept an assignment from Developer of a savings certificate and /or bank account deposits of a portion of the funds received from Price Development Company. Said assignment to the County by Developer of the savings certificate and /or cash funds shall then represent full 'and adequate security for the construction improvements required of Developer in lieu of a bond therefore. 2. Developer agrees to execute assignment agreements in a form acceptable to the County for the purpose of substituting the cash collateral for the aforementioned deed of trust. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above - written. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE, Clerk of the Board By Deputy Clerk -2- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY By By By Patricia Mummey - Chairman Steven Hasson John McBride DEVELOPER: R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC. By R.A. Hanson - President Filed for Record at Request of Name Address City and State whose address is TRUSTEE, whose address is First American Title Insurance Company Drew M. Bodker S. 1401 Grand Blvd. H203 N Spokane, Washington 99203 11115 SPACE PFOVIDEU FOR RECORDER'S USE: Deed of Trust (For Use irl the Stale of Washington Only) THIS DEED OF TRUST, made thia day of April 90 19 ,between R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC., a Washington corporation ,GRANTOR, P.O. Box 7400, Spokane, Washington 99207 and FIRST AMERICAN TITLE IWSUJ E S O Aven ue, a California corporation Spoka Washington 99204and SPOKANE COUNTY, a Municipal corporation W. 1116 Broadway, Spokane, Washington 99260 , BENEFICIARY, whose address is WITNESSETH: Grantor hereby bargains, sells and conveys to Trustee in Trust, with power of sale, the following described real property in Spokane County, Washington: SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE THIS DEED OF TRUST is given as security for that certain Developer Agreement dated April , 1990, between the parties hereto. The term "note" as used in this Deed of Trust shall be substituted throughout by the term "Developer Agreement ". Thus, all obligations referred to herein by the reference of the word note or promissory note, shall mean those obligations of the Developer as set forth in the aforementioned Developer Agreement. which real property is not used principally for agricultural or farming purposes, together with all the tenements, hereditanlents, and appurtenances now or hereafter thereunto belonging or in any wise appertaining, and the rents, issues and profits thereof. This deed is for the purpose of securing performance of each agreement of grantor herein contained, and payment of the st of all sums required under the Developer Agreement Dollars ($ with interest, in accordance with the terms of a promissory note of even dale herewith, payable to Beneficiary or order, and made by Grantor, and all renewals, modifications and extensions thereof, and also such further sums as may be advanced or loaned by Beneficiary to Grantor, or any of their successors or assigns, together with interest thereon at such rate as shall be agreed upon. To protect the security of this Deed of Trust, Grantor covenants and agrees: I. To keep (he property in good condition and repair, to pe 't no waste thereof; incomplete any building, structure or improvement being built or about to be built thereon; to restore promptly any building, structure or improvement thereon winch may be damaged or destroyed; and to comply with all laws, ordi- nances, regulations, covenants, conditions and restrict affecting the properly. 2. To pny before deli oplrut all lawful taxes and assessments upon the property; to ke Wile lle property free and clear of all other charges, liens or encumbrances impairing the security of this Deed of Trust. 3. To keep nil buildings now or hereafter erected on the properly described herein continuously insured against hiss by fire or other hounds in an amount not less than the totaldebt serured by this Deed ofl'rust. MI policiesshallhe held by the Beneficiery',and be in such row pen iesas the Beneficiary may approve and have loss payable first to the Beneficiary, as it s interest nosy appear, and then to the flt11ntnr The amount collected under arty insurance policy luny be applied upon any fndehtedness hereby secured in such order as the Beneficiary shall determine. Such application by the Beneficiary shulh not Cause discontinuance of any proceedings to foreclose this Deed of Trust. In the event of foreclosure, all rights of the Grantor in insurance policies then in force shall pass to the purchaser at the foreclosure sale. 4. To defend any action or proceeding puma ling to affect the security lineof or the rights or vowels of flrnclir inn l' nr 'frmter, 11,1(1 I,, pny ill rust. and ex- penses, including cost of title search and attorney's fees in reasonable amount, in any such nrlion or proceeding, mud in any snit brought by Beneficiary to foreclose this Deed of - frost. F To any nll ro'Ic. free nod eeprneee in connection with this Deed of Titist.inchttling !he expenses of the Truster im'nrred in enforcing the obligation secured rihed, Iteneli, i may pay . . Ile, end tlre .t of the debt secured in this I iced of Ti i t' IS M11'FIIAl.l.V AGlll NAT: I. In the event nay portion of the property is taken or damaged in on eminent domain proceeding, the entire amount of the award or such portion as may be necessary to fully satisfy the obligation secured hereby, shall be paid to Beneficiary to be applied to said obligation. 2. By arceplitgt payment of any sum secured hereby after its due dale, Beneficiary does not waive its right to require prompt payment when due of all other sums so secured or to declare default for failure Io pay. 3. The Trustee shall reconvey nll or any part of the properly covered by this Deed of Trust lathe person entitled thereto, on written request of the Grantor and the Beneficiary, or upon satisfaction of the obligation secured stud written request for reconveyauce made by the Beneficiary or the person entitled thereto. 4. I Ipon default by Grantor in the payment of any indebtedness secured hereby or in the perfnnnnnee of any agreement contained herein, all sums secured hereby shall immediately become due and payable at the option of the Beneficiary. In such event and upon written request of Beneficiary,'I'nistee shall sell the trust property, in accordance with the Deed uf'1'rust Act of the State of Washington, at public auction to the highest bidder. Any person except Trustee may hid at 'T'rustee's sale. 'Trustee shall apply the proceeds of the sale as billows: (I) to the expense of the sale, including a reasonable Trustee's fee and attorney's fee; (21 to the obligation secured by this Deed of 'Trust; (3) the surplus, if any, shall he distributed to die persons entitled thereto. 5. Trustee shall deliver to the purchaser at the sale its deed, without warranty, which shall convey to the purchaser the interest in the properly which Grantor had or had the power to convey at the time of his execution of this Deed of Trust, and such as he tiny have acquired thereafter. 't'rustee's deed shall recite the facts showing that the side was conducted in compliance with all the requirements of haw and of tins Deed of Trust, which recital shall be prima fade evidence of such compliance and conclusive evidence thereof in favor of bona fide purchaser and encumbrancers for value. 6. The power of sale conferred by this Deed ofl'rust and by the Deed of 'trust. Act of the State of Washington is not an exclusive remedy; Beneficiary may cause this Deed of 'Trust to be fut °closed as a mortgage. 7. In the event of the death, incapacity, disability or resignation of Trustee, Beneficiary may appoint in writing a successor trustee, and upon the recording of such appoint meat in the mortgage records of the county in which this Deed of Trust is recutded, the successor trustee shall be vested with all powers of the original trustee.'1'1w trustee is not obligated to n any party hereto of pending sale under any other Deed of Trust or of any action or proceeding in which Grantor, Trustee or Beneficiary shoal hen party unless such action or proceeding is brought by the 'Trustee. 8. This Deed of Trust applies to, inures to the benefit of, and is binding not only on the parties hereto, but on their heirs, devisees, legatees, administrators, executors and assigns. The term Beneficiary shall mean the holder and owner of the note secured hereby, whether or not named as Beneficiary herein. R.A. HANSON COMPANY, INC, STATE OF WASII1NC1't)N COUN'T'Y OF On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individualist described in and who executed the within' and foregoing instrument, and ack- nowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official sent this day of 19 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Dated 18 paid. with niftiest at dui ir set l„it L l n t BA R.A. Hanson - President STA'T'E OF WASIIING'TON COUNTY OF Spokane REQUEST FOR FULL RECONVEYANCE Do not record. To be used only when note has been paid. uc;l her rhy, .,11:111 Lc addc,d u, anti Leconte a On this.-- --- --_._- -day of _ April , 19.91—, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly com- missioned and sworn, pe room tally appeared R.A. Hanson mint to me known to be the PresidentXhX X XXX XXX XxX XX,$teatk4 yx xxvvxaiesdx of _RA_ U1aBSO13 _Colupa ny ,_I n r the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instru- ment lobe the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the usesand purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated (hot he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of ■ashington, residing at TO: TRUSTEE. The undersigned is the le gal owner and holder of the note and all other indebt ed ness secured by the within Deed of Trust. Said note, together with another indebtedness secured by said heed uf'Frtist, has been fully paid and satisfied; and you are hereby requested and directed, on payment to you of any awns owing to you under the terms of said Deed of 'Trust, to cancel said note above mentioned, and all other evidences of indebtedness secured by said Deed of Trust delivered to you herewith, together with the said Deed of Trust, and to reconvey, without warranty, to the parties designated by the terms of said Deed of Trust, all the estate now held by you thereunder. Do not lase or tit :xlrov Otis Deed of 7}ast Oft THE NOTE which it secures. Both must be delit'rml to the 'l }ustee for cancellation before reconceyance will be made. EXHIBIT "A" That portion of Sections 11, 13 and 14, T. 25 N, R. 44 S.X.X. described se follows: Begin at the NW corner of said Section 13; thence S 02'46 "E, along th West line of said Section 13, 60.72 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence S 69 81.37 feet to the Beginning of a nontangent curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 40.00 feet and a radial bearing of S 87 "W; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 71 , an arc distance of 49.64 feet; thence S 73'52'58•E 384.82 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 1442.00 feet; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 12 an arc distance of 309.04 feet; thence s 28 23'47 6 W radial to said curve 92.00 feet; thence S 37 126.03 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 633.00 feet and a radial bearing of N38 "E, said point being on the Northerly R/W of the E -NS ramp for Interstate 90 (I -90) at Sullivan Road; thence Westerly through a central angle of 41 an arc distance of 454.98 feet ;. thence S 87 along said Northerly R/W 200.29 feet to the line between said Sections 13 i 14; thence Continuing S 87 along the Northerly R/W of the NS -W ramp for I -90 at Sullivan Road, 1048.61 feet to the Northerly R/W of said I -90: thence N 77'54'39 "W, along said Northerly line, 216.86 feet; thence N 76 along said Northerly line, 1550.20 feet: thence N 74 along said : bortherly.line,;,.620,00 feet; thence N 56'26'27"W 778.50 feet; thence M 06720 *W 950.00 feet to a point a on curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6684.56 feet and a radial bearing of S 06 "E, said point being on the Southerly R/W of the Union Pacific Railroad; thence Easterly, along said R/W, through a central angle of 11'17'05• an arc distance of 1316.56 feet; thence N 72 along said R/W 551.72 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 964.95 feet and a radial bearing of S 53 °w, said point being on the Southwesterly line of the State Parka Department Property as shown on .. Record of Survey filed in Survey book 41 page 84; the next 6 courses are along said Southwesterly line, thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 9 , an arc distance of . 159.61 feet; thence S 45 912.03 feet to the beginning of a. curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 2874.80 feet; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 11 an arc distance of 592.48 feet: thence S 57'26'08 6 E 588.09 feet ;thence S 32 10.00 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave to the Northeast with radius of 5749.58 feet and a radial bearing of S 32 thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 5 ",an arc distance of 601.43 feet to the Westerly A/W of Sullivan Road; thence S 03 "E, along said Westerly R/W, 164.40 feet] thence S 02'46'23 "E, along said Westerly R/W, 37.28 feet; thence S 69 57'29 °E 59.67 feet to the True P.O.B. EXCEPT State Right of Way. Sitaete'in the County of_Spokane, of Washington. • Ii I PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER P,a IN REFERENCE TO THE, b;TACHED FINDINGS 8 ORDER, THE H ING EXAMINER COMMITTEE 71271711477773171116 PLANNING REPORT CONDITIONS OF APrROVAL ATTACHED HERETO: 1. That the below listed conditions of all Departments and Agencies are binding upon the applicant, owner(s) of the property, heirs, successors o L_ Z or assigns. ( COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2. The preliminary plat of record approval is for the property legally described in the application for this proposal. 3. That the final plat(s) or phases be designed substantially in conformance ith the preliminary plat of record as legally described and advertised. ' the Subdivision Administrator may grant administrative approvals for divisions of land as provided by State law or ordinance provided such divisions are consistent with the concept plan.] 4. The Spokane County Subdivision Administrator shall review any proposed Final Plat to insure compliance with the Findings and Conditions of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. X11l final plats shall illustrate the 200 ft. setback from the ordinary high water mark pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act) 5. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval ,for three.(3) years to November 1, 1988. The applicant may request an Extension of Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 6. Upon filing the Final Plat the zone change of the Final Plat area shall be finalized and the existing Agricultural and Restricted Industrial zone classifications shall be in accordance, with the zoning concept plan. 7. ?rior to finalization of any part of the project, the existing Burlington Northern railroad,l_ines through the western portion of the property will be either. acquired and abandoned or relocated to the north of Indiana Avenue along the riparian park on the preliminary plat. 8. The applicant shall submit evidence that a nystructureslocated within the development are compatible with easement rights of any grantees of record, i.e., transmission lines prior to building permit release. i9. Prior to the finalization of Phase I, the general area shown as the riparian be owned and maintained as a passive park by the ? roperty ..Owners.Association.to be formed by the purchasers of lots within the project. Specific conditions, covenants and restrictions relating to maintenance and use of the park shall be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Zoning Administrator and filed with the Spokane County Auditor. Nothing within this condition shall prohibit the sponsor or subsequent owners from reaching agreements for the use or transfer of the riparian park to Spokane County. It is the intention of this condition to provide for regular maintenance of the passive park and retain it for public use. C C HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) Planning Department (Cont'd) 1 That the planting and maintenance of the limited access areas shown as ,pen pac at the Sullivan Road /I- 90`interchange and south of Indiana shall a provided by applicant or successors consistent with road _landscaping'requirements of Spokane County and the State of Washington. 11. The open space plantings -and maintenance at the proposed Evergreen;tm interchange shall be provided by the applicant or successor at the time the interchange is established. 12 \ The boulevard treatment landscaping for_IndiaiTalwill be established* �� provided for as part of Phase'I by the applicant or successors 13. That a Fina1`Plat`name.be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. (144 That appropriate utility indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat, for distribution to the County!Plan_ning Department, :Utili.tiesDepartment, Engineering Department, Health District and appl i cabl e: uti l i_tj compani es. S _�7 th uttl_iayrcCmp�ind:es�musi b_ atia3'p 'at. 71 es.. dE Con 4414t1 FINAL rLRf 15 4ta•si DO••F So lWY i•• EA tinei 1 • Caw ns e.., o✓ GINAL 15. That a current'.certi fi cate :bf„ ti tl e be furnished the County,;P,l;anni hg Department prior to filing the final plat. . 16. That the provisions of SEP.A_S1NOTICE.OF'ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RC'W be initiated by the project applicant within thirty. (30) days , final,: disposition _of.;this.appl_ication;:,and prior to any on -site improvements unless the applicants) /sponsor(s) choose to file a notarized Waiver of Notice of Action with the Spokane County Planning Department. .17. A specific landscapeplan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County _„Zoning_Administrator be submitted with a performance bond for lots to be developed prior to release of building permits. 18. That a plan fort eter? facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection be approved by the waterrsupplier, fire protectionAistr3ct Spokane: :County, Buii ding" &' Safety DepartmentLand Countyn lth. authorities. The agencies will certify on the WATER PLAN, prior to the filing of the final plat or any phase of the preliminary plat that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The WATER PLAN and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) Planning Department (Cont'd) The purveyor will also certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved WATER PLAN. The time schedule will provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat sponsor shall also sign the WATER PLAN to confirm the contractual arrangements or agreements. The final plat dedication will contain the following statement: "the public water system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building & Safety Department, and water purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building'permit for each lot." ' 19. That no:occupant5C permi;t3will be issued for any lot within the Final Plat until certified by a Washington :engineer "that the water system has been installed pursuant the approved WATER.PLAN for the Final Plat ", signed and stamped by said engineer. The certification may be in the form of a letter but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the WATER PLAN as a schematic map showing the "As Built" water system. 20 Approval by the Zoning7Administrator:Aof a specific ligfiti g and signing plan for the described property prior ° to the release of any building permits. 21. The applicant shall develop- subject property,,generally _in accordance. within the_conceptjpresented°to the Hearing_Examiner_tommittee: Variations when approved-hg-the-Zoningg Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape. plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the 1986 Spokane County Zoning Code. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 22. All .m iti:gatiiiiiii asures,set forth in thej nal„;EISThe complied with and has been agreed to by the applicant. 23. That the project is subject to the Agdifer. Sensi.tive:Area =OvertayTiZorie 7 of the County Ordinance which sets forth various measures for Aquifer potection; specifically, measures dealing with wastewater disposal, spill protection measures and stormwater runoff. LA NGuA6t LANG „04 := IA •Gunc k. V . HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) Sew Department ( Cont'd) 1 24. The applicant shall provide sight- obscuring cyclone :fencing_6.2ft. in I 4 height along the southerly borders of Lots 1 through 9 of the preliminary plat and along the westerly edge of Lots 10 and 11 which adjoin properties not within the development. Additionally, the applicant shall provide a 6 ft. sight- obscuring fence along Lot 27 in the area which has been indicated by the applicant in a site plan amendment to be dedicated as non - developable. This area is approximately 500 ft. wide extending westerly of Flora Road. COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT > G'3NNj 1. Right-of-Way approval of the road given in the of preliminary plat :of record. 2. That plans, profiles, and cross-sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed_ Professional,.Civil,.Engineer. 3. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil. Engineer. 4. That the regulations of the. NationalTFlood ':Insu'rance'Pedgram`be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. 5. That appropriate provisions be made that the following described property'. be held 'iin:_trust6 until' the continuation of the,•streets be ,dedicated' or deeded: A 1-ft. strip at the ends or edges of - a11 streets that terminate or border the final plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) 6. A statement'.must appear in the dedicatory language of the final plat: "that individual driveway access permits be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system.” 7. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that nojidir_ectaccessbe allowed fr_om,lots.,torSulliyan;Road 8. That all public >roads, the plat be designed andeconstructed to Spokane,CountLstandards. in n' . HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 9. That the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Enginier1a:dpcign prom�o al, - ;acceptable to the►State Highway Depaartmen Cof.,the proposed State - R iwway- County Road intersection. State Hi hway Department approval of the proposed design must be received rio the filing of the final t1-0- plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the responsibility of the sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. This shall include both Phase I and Phase II designs. That the applicant shall coordinate with the Spokane County Parks and Recreation Department and the County Engineer's Department to provide a ;bicycle pathway- through the northern portion of the project paralleling' the Spokane River. This pathway would be provided in lieu of bicycle lanes along the proposed arterial streets. A1L �, QLai 11. That access ;,1'.0 Evergreen Road from: parcels r12 , 15, 16 and 17 is prohibited: That the applicant shall submit to the County.Engineer,an intersection plan for the Evergreen- locaPaccess -road located south of Indiana. 13. The proposed ,plat beii to the standaedss -set forth in :Spokane_, CountyBoardtofMCounty .Commissioners;Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which established regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. ,N^r 14. That prior to finalization of the proposed plat, the applicant shall W°- submit to the County Engineer for review and approval ;Typ:ical'-Roadway� J � - Cross:Sectionnfor the following proposed roadways: ° 1 / 4 / - Q 1 /, a. Indiana Avenue Sullivan to the proposed Evergreen intersection. C /� , b. Indiana Avenue from the proposed Evergreen intersection to the 4 � , e connection with the existing Indiana Avenue at the west end of the proposal. - 5 u Vr c. Evergreen Road south of Indiana Avenue, between Indiana and the proposed Evergreen interchange. d. Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus. 15. The typical roadway cross section for the roadway which connects the proposed; EvergreenzRoad• with the proposed Indic a AVehUe in the westerly portion of the plat shall be .typical roadway, section No; i access standard. 16. That the typical roadway cross section for the cul= de-iac-which is proposed east of Sullivan Road and extends southeasterly from Indiana Avenue shall - be typicaLroadway.sectidn ° No ?T=acceit :itandard. L— 1, HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) - County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 17. That prioF >to recordifiref the final plat', the Burlington Northern yRailroadaine which runs through portions of the proposal on both the east and west sides of Sullivan Road, shall -be :abandoned.or- relocated. Prior to release - of a building permit for those portions of the - proposal identified as Phase 1,'the applicant shall: -1 18 Obtain` ermits? for raadwa` p y`construction.from the appropriate state and count (S y agencies (Spokane County Engineer). 19. Improve the Sullivan_Road,Intersection'in a manner consistent with the approved plans and as set forth in the supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. 20. Construct those roadways which are identified in the supplemental Environmental Impact Statement as being necessary in order to accommodate traffic volumes which will be generated by Phase I. Construction shall be in conformance with the approved roadway plans and typical roadway cross - sections. - Roadway.nconstruction must be completed_ :prior!to the release of building permits or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction improvements, construction certification, "as- built" plans, and monumenting the street centerline shall be filed with the County Engineer. Construct'a connection_2,to: the= ezisting_Indiana"AVihue7which is located to the south and west of the westerly boundary of the proposed plat. It shall be theapplicant's responsibility to obtain the necessary right -of -way alignment for this connection. This connection must provide for a smooth transition between the existing Indiana Avenue and that which is proposed within the plat. The transition alignment shall be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer. The County Engineer will provide assistance during right -of -way negotiations should it be necessary. 22. Construction'within the proposed'publirstreets'and easements -shall be performed under the direct supervision of a4ltensedhengineerfsurveyortr who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as- built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 23. The applicant shall submtt.,,for approval by the:Spokan'e CountyTEngfieer' and the Spokane =County •Health District,a detailed combined on=site3 age system' "plan andIwrface cate`e" disposal plan "for the proposed building • site pr_io,t to the of any ::building ii&mi :t:on the property. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 24. A parking - plan and traffic:circulation_;plan for proposed building sites shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing, as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. 25. The construction of the road'improvementsJstated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County_Engineer. 26. All required improvements'shall conform to the current State Washington Standard Specifications._.for -Road and.Br_idge Construction; and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 27. ;Roadwaystandards;;=typical roadway sections_and drainage "plan requirements are found in .Spokane_ Board 'of - County` Commissioners' Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 28. Should the Phase I development include those portions of the property lying east of Sullivan Road, the applicant will be required to construct the Sullivan Road °improvement -•and interchange modifications which are scheduled for construction in order to accommodate Phase II of the proposal. 29. That;Indiana Avenue_ east of "S41.1Jyan':Road shall be constructed per the approved plans and typical roadway cross - section ff properties easttof Sullivan Road ati2included'in Phase I. 30. That the - County Engineer- MaaypermittIndiana-Avenue, east of Sullivan Road to function as a private-road - that the roadway is constructed in accordance with Spokane County public road standards and in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross - section. - 31. That the applicant must obtain permits,to perform work in the County road 4, 119WigiWayAfra l thenatYlEn - ginettP No work will be performed within the County road right -of -way without a permit. 32. If:In'diana of Sullivan Road is to .functi;on "as a private road o then the applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This documentaprovidesi the _following:? HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County, Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Section 3.07, Sections A S B of that title. 33. The traffic generated by the proposed project will have a significant impact upon Sullivan Road between Interstate 90 and Sprague Avenue. It is anticipated that a two- way_left .jurnllane'will be needed to accommodate turning movements along the Sprague to I -90 corridor. This left turn lane will be required prior; to the construction of Phase.Il: Prior to the commencement of Phase.III it will be necessary to improve Sullivan Road to a seven . jlane -facility. The proposed Design Report for the Evergreen Interchange shall also include a review of traffic conditions along the Sullivan Road /I -90 corridor. The above specified roadway improvements shall be considered within that analysis. It shall be the applicant's-responsibility to pay for the costs-of right -of -way ; acquisitionand roadway improvements along Sullivan between I=90'and Sprague for Phase II. Should other land development occur along the Sprague /I -90 Corridor which has measurable traffic impacts (i.e. large commercial or industrial uses) then a formula for participation in the sharing of costs for roadway improvements will be developed by the County Engineer. The formula will consider the traffic volumes generated by Sullivan Park Center as well as other identified traffic generators. For the Phase III improvements, a formula for the assessment of costs will be developed by the County Engineer in cooperation with the applicant. Of principal consideration in the development of the formula will be the traffic volumes generated by this project, traffic generated by other projects and other traffic utilizing the roadway. 34. That prior to ;the initiation of.P;.hAS IlPof the proposed development, the applicant will conduct an updated 2 This study may be included within the design report which will`Be prepared for the Evergreen Road Interchange. The Design Report shall also consider the impacts upon the County Road System of the extension of a connection to Mission Avenue from the proposed Evergreen Interchange. This analysis shall include potential traffic impacts upon Evergreen Road between Sprague Avenue and the connection. . t, HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 6Tht PHAS Roadway construction and improvements for Phase II of the proposal shall be consistent with the improvements which have been identified within the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. Those improvements are as follows: 35. Construction and upgrading of the Sullivan Road- Indiana intersection in a manner consistent with the plans which have been improved by the Spokane County Engineer and the State of Washington Department of Transportation. 36. Construction of new freeway interchange at or near the alignment of Evergreen Road as identified within the Supplemental EIS. 37. Construction of Evergreen Road from Indiana Avenue southward to the proposed freeway interchange. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. 38. Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed Evergreen Road) shall be improved to a five -lane facility from Evergreen Road westerly to the connection with the existing Indiana Avenue. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. That Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed plat) must be widened to provide additional traffic lanes in order to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. A five lane facility is required to mitigate the traffic impacts upon Indiana Avenue and adjoining business properties. A plan for the upgrade of the intersection at Pines and Indiana must be submitted to the County Engineer as specified in condition #9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to secure the additional right -of -way for the improvement of Indiana Avenue. 39. Indiana Avenue (east of Sullivan Road) shall be constructed as a five -lane facility from Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus of the project. Indiana shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. 40. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to function as a private road, providing that the roadway is constructed in accordnace with Spokane County Public Road Standards in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross- section. 41. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County road right -of -way from the County. Engineer. No work will be performed within the County road right -of -way without a permit. 'VW HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 42. If Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This document provides the following: That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road Improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Section 3.07, Sections A and B of that title. 43. Should the Evergreen Interchange Design Report determine that the level of improvements as specified within the Suplemental EIS are not necessary for Phase II, then the County Engineer may approve a phased plan for roadway construction or design deviations for Phase II roadway improvements. 44. That a public road Right -of -Way connection shall be provided to properties which are located to the south and east of Parcels #27 and #28 as depicted on the preliminary plat. This will require a redesign of the plat in this area. PHASE III 45. The roadway improvements for Phase III identified within the Supplemental EIS are the connection from the new freeway interchange at Evergreen Road southward to Mission Avenue and the possible connections northward and eastward of the proposal. The need for these improvements will be addressed in the development of the Evergreen Interchange Design Report. The level of improvements, assignment of financial responsibility for improvements and timing of construction will be determined on the basis of traffic volumes, location of facilities and traffic safety related issues. 46. Phase III improvements as identified by the Design Report shall be constructed prior to the commencement of Phase III construction. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Health District (COnt'd) 2. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: °A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage system shall not be authorized." 3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social & Health Services. 4. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 5. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1 The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System. Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Connection to the Valley sewer system is to be made prior to release of occupancy permits for any structures within the site. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1. That the applicant obtain necessary approval from the Department of Transportation for each phase of the project prior to finalization. 2. That the applicant submit proof to the Planning Department file that Washington State Department of Transportation conditions have been satisfactorily handled prior to finalization of any portion of the preliminary plat. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) WASHINGTON STATE OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION 1. In the event that archaeological or historic resources are discovered during project activities, the applicant or successor shall notify the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation in Olympia, Washington. //,-'2.7 Date l ;(,': 1. Chairperson In reply refer to: UE Mr. Drew M. Bodker Attorney and Counselor at Law S. 1401 Grand Blvd. Suite 203 North Spokane, Washington 99203 Dear Mr. Bodker: Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Upper Columbia Area Room 561, U.S. Court House West 920 Riverside Avenue Spokane, Washington 99201 -1083 March 14, 1990 3. Access to the transmission line structures, and to right -of -way by BPA's maintenance crews, shall not obstructed. 5. BPA's right -of -way shall be restored to its orginal following construction. Any damage to BPA property proposed use shall be repaired at the requester's e Per your letter dated February 23, 1990, you requested permission to construct a road across Bonneville Power Administration's (BPA) rights -of -way. The affected sections of rights -of -way are under BPA's Trentwood - Valley Way 115 -kV line, between Structures 1 /11 and 2/1, and the Vera Tap to the Valley Way Tap 115 -kV line, between Structures 1/3 and 1/5. In addition to the crossing permit, you are also requesting that BPA relocate Structure 1/4 of the Vera Tap to the Valley Way Tap 115 -kV line. We reviewed the concept of this request and have no objections. Conditions of the required permit would include the following: 1. The entity (requester) requesting the structure relocation would pay all costs associated with the relocation of the structure. BPA would perform the required design and construction work. 2. All National Electric Safety Code and BPA clearance standards will be met. and along the be interfered with or condition or better, resulting from the xpense. 6. A minimum distance of 25 feet shall be maintained between edge of right -of -way and the wood pole structures. If this clearance cannot be met, guard devices such as barriers, guard rails, and /or posts shall be installed to protect BPA's structures. The proposed road designs (both plan and profile) pertaining to those sections of road involving BPA rights -of -way should be submitted to BPA as soon as practical to avoid untimely construction delays. If you have any questions or need further information, please call Dan Cadman at (509) 353 -2568 or me at (509) 353 -2591. Sincerely, cc w /attachment: Gary Nelson Spokane County Engineer's Office Ed Woessner Electrical Engineer ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW Mr. Paul E. Eichin Area Engineer Bonneville Power Administration Room 561 U.S. Courthouse W. 920 Riverside Spokane, Washington 99201 Re: Sullivan Park Mall Dear Mr. Eichin: February 23, 1990 S. 1401 GRAND BLVD.. SUITE 203 NORTH 1509) 456-5100 FAX: (509) 456 -5114 This letter is being written to you for the purpose of securing permission from the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) the right to cross under two of your transmission lines for the purpose of constructing certain improvements necessary to the construction of the Sullivan Park Mall, which will be constructed between Evergreen Road on the west, Sullivan Road on the east, the Spokane River on the north, and Interstate 90 on the south, in the Spokane Valley. Specifically, it will be necessary to construct a new roadway, which will be a new Indiana Avenue running between Sullivan Road and Evergreen Road, as a five -lane facility which will then be dedicated to Spokane County. Additionally, there will be necessary utilities brought to the subject property which will also cross under your transmission lines. These will include sewer, water and electricity. The pipe to be used for that portion of the sewer and water which run under your transmission lines will plastic pvc pipe and not iron pipe. Attached to this letter are specific plans which illustrate the location of your transmission lines on the proposed plat. In addition to the construction of the road and other utilities which will cross your transmission lines, 'it will also be necessary to move your pole #f either 140 feet to the south, or 240 feet to the north of its present location. This will be required to accommodate new Indiana Avenue in a location that has been brought about by a re- alignment of the road as requested by Price Development Company (Price Development Company is the developer for the shopping center). It is our understanding that Mr. Paul E. Eichin February 23, 1990 Page Two the process required to obtain formal permission to move the pole may be a very lengthy endeavor, whereas we are seeking approval of our proposed plat from Spokane County as soon as possible. Spokane County has advised us that they will not approve the proposed plat until they receive a written letter from the BPA in which the EPA states that they do not have objection to our proposed plans. This letter is being written to you today for the purpose of seeking a letter from your office which will state to Spokane County that the EPA will allow the construction of the proposed improvements under its transmission lines, provided that the developer, R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., or its successors and assigns, pays for all costs incurred in relocating or raising the aforementioned power pole or poles, or any other such expenses. We also understand that we must meet all of your criteria for the construction of roads and other utilities on your right of way. We respectfully request a response to this letter at your earliest covenience because we cannot proceed to file our plat until we have received approval from the BPA. Thank you for your consideration of this request. If there is any other information that you should require to complete your evaluation, please call me immediately. Thank you. DMB /slm Enclosure cc: R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. Simpson Engineers Very tr ly yo s DREW M. BODKER Attorney for R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. In reply refer to: LIE Mr. Drew M. Bodker Attorney and Counselor at Law S. 1401 Grand Blvd. Suite 203 North Spokane, Washington 99203 Dear Mr. Bodker: Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Upper Columbia Area Room 561, U.S. Court House ' West 920 Riverside Avenue Spokane, Washington 99201 -1083 March 14, 1990 R ECEIVED MAR 16 1990 Per your letter dated February 23, 1990, you requested permission to construct a road across Bonneville Power Administration's (BPA) rights -of -way. The affected sections of rights -of -way are under BPA's Trentwood - Valley Way 115 -kV line, between Structures 1 /11 and 2/1, and the Vera Tap to the Valley Way Tap 115 -kV line, between Structures 1/3 and 1/5. In addition to the crossing permit, you are also requesting that BPA relocate Structure 1/4 of the Vera Tap to the Valley Way Tap 115 -kV line. We reviewed the concept of this request and have no objections. Conditions of the required permit would include the following: 1. The entity (requester) requesting the structure relocation would pay all costs associated with the relocation of the structure. BPA would perform the required design and construction work. 2. All National Electric Safety Code and BPA clearance standards will be met. 3. Access to the transmission line structures, and to and along the right —of —way by BPA's maintenance crews, shall not be interfered with or obstructed. 5. BPA's right —of —way shall be restored to its orginal condition or better, following construction. Any damage to BPA property resulting from the proposed use shall be repaired at the requester's expense. 6. A minimum distance of 25 feet shall be maintained between edge of right -of -way and the wood pole structures. If this clearance cannot be met, guard devices such as barriers, guard rails, and /or posts shall be installed to protect BPA's structures. r S The proposed road designs (both plan and profile) pertaining to those sections of road involving BPA rights -of -way should be submitted to BPA as soon as practical to avoid untimely construction delays. If you have any questions or need further information, please call Dan Cadman at (509) 353 -2568 or me at (509) 353 -2591. Sincerely, cc w /attachment: Gary Nelson Spokane County Engineer's Office Ed Woessner Electrical Engineer 2 ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW Mr. Gary Nelson Spokane County Engineers Spokane County Public Works N. 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 -0180 Dear Gary: Re: Sullivan Park March 20, 1990 5. 1401 GRAND BLVD.. SUITE 203 NORTH . 4 lane, 2t� . ggr'O5' 15091456 -5100 FAX: (509) 456 -5114 Enclosed please find a copy of the letter I received from the Bonneville Power Administration which indicates the fact that Bonneville Power has no objection to the proposed Indiana Avenue provided that the conditions outlined in the letter are strickly adhered to. I understand that this will now satisfy the County's requirement that we secure the permission from the BPA before the plat is filed. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please advise. Thank you for your continuing cooperation in this matter. Very tru y yours, DREW M. BODRER Attorney at Law DMB /slm Enclosure .,: , cc: R.A. Hanson Company � `c Price Development Company MAR 2 21990 o SPUME CCAMITY E! ZH EER AtAN REPORT FOR PLAT CERTIFICATE ✓qN ,2,5- o TICOR TITLE INSURANCE MANY 19 90 West 521 First Avenue /OB Spokane, Washington 99204 Telephone: (509) 838 -5281 REPORT FOR PLAT CERTIFICATE Refer to: C- 194497 -KC Re: Hanson Sinpson Engineers Attn: Steve Davenport N. 909 Argonne Rd. Spokane, Washington cc: County Engineer cc: County Planning This is a report for plat certificate as of January 9, 1990 at 8:00 a.m. covering the following property: That portion of Sections 11, 13 and 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., described as follows: • Begin at the northwest corner of said Section 13; thence South 02 ° 46'23" East, along the West line of saig Section 13, 60.72 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 69 57'29" East, 81.37 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave tg the Northeast with a radius of 40.00 feet and a radial bnarl of South 87 13'37" West; thence Southeasterly throw a central angle of 71 06'35 ", an arc distance of 49.64 feet; thence South 73 52'58" East, 384.82 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 1442.00 feet; thence Southeasterly throug3 a central angle of 12 16'45 ", an arc distance of 309.04 feet* thence South 28 23'47" West, radial to said curve 92.00 feet; thence South 37 6 11'15" West, 126.03 feet to a point on a curve concave o the Southwest with a radius of 633.00 feet and a radial bearing of North 38` East, said point being on the Northerly right - of-way of the E -NS ramp for Inter 90 (I -90) at Sullivan Road; thence Westerly through a central angle of 41 an arc distance of 454.98 feet; thence South 87 14'19" West, along said Northerly right - of-way 200.29 fe to the line between said Sections 13 and 14; thence continuing South 87'1.4'19" West along the Northerly right - of-way of the NSW ramp for I -90 at Sullivan Road, 1048.61 feet to the Northerly right -of -way of said I -90; thence North 77 ° 54'39" West, along said Northerly line, 216.86 feet; thenc8 North 76 ° 55'02" West, along said Northerly line, 1550.20 feet; then North 76 10'41" West, along said Northerly line, 620.00 feet; thence North 56 West, 778.50 feet; thence North 06 28'18" West 950.00feet to a point on a curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6684.56 feet and a radial },Paring of South 06 ° 28'18" Fast, said point being on the Southerly riot- of-way of the Union Pacific Railroa91; thence Easterly, along said right -of -way, throug3 a central angle of 11 an arc distance of 1316.56 feet; thence North 72 East, along said right-of-way 551.72 feet to a point on a curve concave too a Northeast with a radius of 964.95 feet and a radial bearing of South 53 51'00" West, said point being on the southwesterly line of the State Parks Department Property, as shown on Record of Survey filed in Survey Book 41, page 84; the next six courses are a�ong said southwesterly line, thence southeasterly through a central angle of 9 an arc distance of 159.61 feet; thence south 45 East, 912.03 - 1 - feet to the of a curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 2874.80 feet; thence southeasterly through a central angle of 11 ° 48'30 ", an arc diptancs of 592.48 feet; thence South 57 East 588.09 feet; thence South 32 West, 10.00 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave to the Northeast with radius of 5749.58 feet and a radial bearing of South 32 West; thence southeasterly through a central angle of 5 ° 59'36 ", an arc distance of 601.43 feet to the westerly right-of-way of Sullivan Road; thence South 03 ° 24'03" East, along said Westerly right -of -way, 164.40 feet; thence South 02 ° 46'23" Fast, along said Westerly right -of -way, 37.28 feet; thence South 69 ° 57'29" East, 59.67 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington; EXCEPT State Highway right -of -way. Record Title is vested in R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., a corporation, as to a strip of land 60 feet wide, being 30 feet upon each side, of the center of the Coeur d'Alene and Spokane Railway Company railway line, as granted by deeds, Volume 143, Page 251, and Volume 143, page 272; and Whitworth Foundation, a non -profit corporation, as to the remainder. SUBJECT TO: 1. Lien of real estate excise sales tax upon any sale of said premises, if unpaid. 2. General taxes for 1990, paid until February 15, (Assessor's Parcel No. 45113.9026; 45114.9031; in the sum of $(not yet available), which cannot be 1990. 11543 -9026; 11544 -9031; 13542 -9040; 14541- 9170(old), 45132.9040; 45141.9170(new), Code 140) Said taxes affect: Section 11, Twp. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., as to portion of SW1 /4 lying South of SIRR R/W nd Nly of PSH #2, subject to easement; Section 11, Twp. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., as to portion of Gov't Lots 6 -10 and 11 lying Sly of SIRR R/W and SWly of SWly line of Inland Empire Paper Carpany R/W and Nly of PSH #2 subject to easement; Section 13, TWp. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., portion of Gov't Lots 3 and 4 described as follows: Beginning at intersection of South line of Inlann Empire Paper Co. RY R/W and North line of Burlington Northern RY, thence N.61 02'04" West to North line of NW1 /4 thence west to east line of Sullivan Road, thence Sly along said East line to Nly line of PSH No.2, thence SEly along said Nly line to south line of Gov't Lot 3, thence East along said south line to SE corner of said Gov't Lot 3, thence North to Nly line of Burlington Northern RY R/W, thence Wly along said Nly line to point of beginning except RR R/W; Section 14, Twp. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., portion of NE1 /4 North of PSH #2. The real estate under search is assessed with other lands. The proposed segregation may require short platting pursuant to Spokane County Short Plat Ordinance. Inquiry should be made to the Spokane County Planning Department for compliance. - 2- 3. Irrigation assessment of $(not yet available), by Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19, for 1990. The first half will be delinquent April 30th. The last half will be delinquent October 31st, if unpaid. 4. Inquiry for any charges for irrigation, domestic water, electricity or other charges made by Consolidated Irrigation District #19, should be made to said district at North 120 Greenacres Road, or phone 924 -3655. 5. Unrecorded Contract of Sale, constructive notice or disclosures of which is given by recital in instrument herein set forth. Disclosed by : Notice of Real Estate Contract Instrument Dated: May 31, 1978 Recorded : June 15, 1978 Auditor's No. : 7806150379 Contract Dated • May 31, 1978 Vendor : Whitworth Foundation, a non -profit corporation Vendee : R.A. Hanson and Company, Inc., a corporation Affects : Said premises and other property 6. Decree of Appropriation filed February 5, 1986, in Spokane County Superior Court Cause Nos. 84202146 -7 and 84202145 -9, wherein the State of Washington appropriated portions of the Northeast quarter of Section 14, Government Lots 3 and 4 of the South half of the North half of Section 13, and the South half of Section 11 for Interstate 90. Said Decree states, in part, as follows: "TOGETHER WITH all rights of ingress and egress, if any (including all existing future or potential easements of access, light, view and air) to, flout, and between said SR 90 and the remainder of Tract "X ". EXCEPT that there shall be reasonable ingress and egress to, ft.un and between said Tract "X" and the Sullivan Road Line Survey of said SR 90 Northerly of HES 50+92.16 Lt. and HES 50+63.83 Rt. TOGETHER WITH the right to enter upon the respondents remaining lands, where necessary, to remove irovements, if any, located wholly or partially upon the right of way." 7. Effect of Relocation Agreement Dated : December 6, 1989 Recorded : December 13, 1989 Auditor's No. : 8912130174 By and Between: The United States of America, AND, The Consolidated Irrigation District, AND, The R.A. Hanson and Company 8. Provisions contained in Order Including Lands and Redefining Boundaries of the Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19, regarding R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., recorded February 15; 1989, under auditor's file No. 8902150286. - 3- 9. A perpetual easement for one or more electric power transmission lines granted to the United States of America, together with the right to clear said land and to keep same clear of brush, timber, structures, and fire hazards. Width : 100 feet Recorded : June 8, 1959 Auditor's No. : 629711B Section Affects : the Government h 1/22 of SE /4of the NE 1/4, the South 1 part of the NE1 /4 of the NE1 /4 and the East 300 feet of the NW1 /4 of the NE1 /4 of Section 14. 10. Easement for pipeline for the transportation of oil, gas and the products thereof wherein the grantee agrees not to build, create or construct or to permit to be built, created or constructed any obstruction, building, engineering works, or other structures over or that would interfere with said pipeline. In Favor of : The Washington Water Power Company, a corporation Recorded : January 8, 1962 Auditor's No. : 831986B Affects : *see below * AFFECTS: That portion of Sections 11 and 14, lying Sly of the Sly right of way line of Spokane, Coeur d'Alene and Palouse Railroad (Great Northern) and Nly of Primary State Highway No. 2, as now located A 15 foot permanent easement on the South 15 feet of said tract adjacent to the North line of the Freeway (PSH No. 2), the center line of the gas line to be 7 1/2 feet North of the edge of the Freeway right of way and installed with minimim, cover of 48 inches. Minimum pipe cover 48 inches. 11. Easement for pipeline for the transportation of oil, gas and the products thereof wherein the grantee agrees not to build, create or construct or to permit to be built, created or constructed any obstruction, building, engineering works, or other structures over or that would interfere with said pipeline. In Favor of : The United States of America Recorded : June 22, 1965 Auditor's No. : 118205C Affects : portion of said premises and other property - 4 - 12. An easement affecting the portion of said premises and for the purposes stated herein, and incidental purposes. For : The right, privilege and authority to install, reinstall, construct, erect, alter, repair, energize, operate and maintain electric underground transmission and distribution facilities, consisting of vaults, manholes, hardholes, ducts, conduits, cables, wires and other necessary or convenient appurtenances; also the right, privilege, and authority to install, reinstall, construct, erect, alter, repair, energize, operate and maintain at ground level, electric transformer units, electric junction cabinets ardor containers, together with appurtenances necessary or convenient to make said underground and surface installations an integrated electric system and in connection with all the foregoing to cut, trim, or chemically treat trees and shrubbery, to chip and spread branches and other foliage and to pile and stack logs as necessary alongside the cleared right - of-way in accordance with REA specifications, to the extent necessary to install and maintain said electric system. In Favor of : Inland Power & Light Co., a Washington corporation Recorded : July 28, 1972 Auditor's No. : 640587C Affects : *see below * AFFECTS: That portion of the South half of Section 11, lying North of Primary State Highway No. 90 and that portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM lying North of Primary State Highway No. 90 - Line to be located within a strip of land lying 10 feet right and 10 feet left of the following described line: Beginning at a point which lies 752 feet North of the South line and 187 feet East of the West line of Section 11, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM; thence South 73 40' East paralleling the North right of way ling of Primary State Highway No. 90, a distance of 3255 feet, thence South 80'00' Fact 210 feet to a point 45 feet west of the east line og the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 14, thence North 3'12'40" West 1880 feet more or less to the 1987.2 feet contour line, North of the Spokane River and other property 13. An easement herein, and For In Favor of Recorded Affects affecting the portion of said prenisns and for the purposes stated incidental purposes. : the right to erect and maintain poles with the necessary wires and fixtures thereon, and to keep same free from foliage. : Pacific States Telephone and Telegraph Company : In Volume 165 of Deeds, Page 305 : The Southeast quarter of Section 11 - 5 - NOTE: The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. has succeeded to rights granted by this easement 14. An easement herein, and For In Favor of Recorded Affects 15. An easement herein, and For In Favor of Dated Recorded Affects affecting the portion of said premises and for the purposes stated incidental purposes. Transmission power line : Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad Company, a corporation : In Volume 344 of Deeds, Page 371 : The NE 1/4 of the NE1 /4 of Section 14. affecting the portion of said premises and for thejpurposes stated incidental purposes. : The Sullivan Road, County Road Project No. 116. : Spokane County : October 29, 1948 : In Volume 578 of Deeds, Page 370 : The Fast 30 feet of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, the East 30 feet of the SE1 /4 of Section 11 16. A perpetual easement for one or more electric power transmission lines granted to the United States of America, together with the right to clear said land and to keep same clear of brush, timber, structures; and fire hazards. Width : 150 feet Recorded : November 1, 1948 Auditor's No. : 847007A Affects : the South 1/2 of Section 11 17. Easement for pipeline for the transportation of oil, gas and the products thereof wherein the grantee agrees not to build, create or construct or to permit to be built, created or constructed any obstruction, building, engineering works, or other structures aver or that would interfere with said pipeline. In Favor of The Washington Water Power Company Recorded : May 10, 1985 Auditor's No. : 8505100167 • Affects : A 20 ft. strip of land, Nly of and running parallel with and adjoining Washington State Highway SR -90, in the NW1 /4 of the NE1 /4 and the NE1 /4 of the NE1 /4, in Section 14. 18. Bill of Sale recorded December 27, 1940, under Auditor's File No." 472498A, between Inland Empire Paper Company, a corporation and the Washington water Power Company, a corporation, for all of the electrical distribution lines of the first party located in Sections 12 and 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., in Spokane County, Washington; also all easements, right of ways, permits, privileges, and franchises and other licenses, contracts, and rights for or relating to the construction, maintenance and operation of said electrical distribution lines. - 6 - 19. An easement herein, and For In Favor of Recorded Auditor's No Affects affecting the portion of said premises incidental purposes. : the right to reconstruct and maintain tion lines. : The Washington Water Power Company, a : December 27, 1940 . : 472499A : Lots 3 and 4 in the NW1 /4 of Section 13, Twp. 25 Range 44 East, W.M. 20. affecting the portion of said premises incidental purposes. : a perpetual easement for use as a : Spokane County : January 21, 1949 . : 859802A : *see below An easement herein, and For In Favor of Recorded Auditor's No Affects *AFFECTS: a strip of land 30 feet wide on each side of and parallel with the center line of Sullivan Road, and the West 30 feet of that portion of the northwest quarter of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., that lies North of the Spokane Valley Irrigation District canal. 21. Relinquishment of right of access to state highway and of light, view and air, under terms of Deed to the State of Washington. Recorded : September 28, 1955 Auditor's No. : 344727B Affects : Lots 3 and 4, Section 13 22. Right of Entry Executed By In Favor Of : Hanson Properties, Inc. : The Washington Water Power Company, aryl /or its subsidiaries and assigns and in particular to Spokane Industrial Park Incorporated. Recorded : September 19, 1985 Auditor's No. : 8509190152 FOR: Right of entry and privilege and permit of ingress and egress over, across and upon the hereinafter described lands and further, permission to connect into the manhole which has been installed by Permitter and is located on Sullivan Road South of the SR 90 /Sullivan Interchange at the intersection of Mission Avenue and Sullivan Road, from date hereof until completion of construction for the purpose of installation of said sewer distribution line within the right of way as now staked upon the ground. AFFECTS: The NW1 /4 of the NW1 /4 of Section 13, and the SW1 /4 of the SW1 /4 of Section 12, all in Twp. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M. NOTES: 1. Aquifer protection fees that may be due and payable in accordance with chapter 36.36 RCW. (Specific amounts may be obtained from the County Utility Department, phone #458 - 2538). - 7 - and for the purposes stated electrical distribu- corporation North, and for the purposes stated public road This report shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the certificate applied for. No Change - 8 - TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Spokane County Office Please direct your review comments to Paul Jensen. Thank You. kc Enclosure c SP0%ANC COUNTY' COURT T'OUSC rev: 12/89 MEMORANDUM PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 10 Spokane County County Engineer (No map forwarded) Spokane County Utilities Spokane County Health District Spokane County Department of Building & Safety Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department Fire Protection District #1 Consolidated Irrigation District FROM: homas G. Mosher, AICP, Senior Planner DATE: February 16, 1990 SUBJECT: Review of Final PE- 1504 -85 Sullivan Park Center Enclosed find copies of the above referenced final plat. Please review and forward any comments by March 2, 1990. If you have any questions you may contact Paul Jensen at 456 -2205. R.A. Hansen Properties, Inc., P.O. Box 7400, Spokane, WA. 99207 Clarence E. Simpson Engineers, Inc., N. 909 Argonne Rd., Spokane, WA. 99212 RECEIVED F EB 16 1990 County Engineering RECEIVED FEB �yo Mi Engineer* - 1- RECO FEB 1 6 7,930 S EgBineer REPORT FOR FIAT CERTIFICATE TIOOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY West 521 First Avenue Spokane, Washington 99204 Telephone: (509) 838 -5281 REPORT FOR PLAT CERTIFICATE Refer to: C- 194497 -KC Re: won Simpson Engineers . cc. County Engineer Attn. Steve Davenport cc• County Planning N. 909 Argonne Rd. Spokane, Washington This is a report for plat certificate as of January 9, 1990 at 8:00 a.m. covering the following property: That portion of Sections 11, 13 and 14, Township.25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., described as follows: Begin at the northwest corner of said Section 13; thence South 02 ° 46'23" Fast, along the West line of saig Section 13, 60.72 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 69 57'29" East, 81.37 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave t the Northeast with a radius.of 40.00 feet and a radial bearin of South 87 West; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 71 an arc distance of 49.64 feet; thence South 73 East, 384.82 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 1442.00 feet; thence Southeasterly througj3 a central angle of 12 an arc distance ofr309.04r:feetb thence South 28'23'47" West, radial to said curve 92.00 feet; thence South 37 11'15" West, 126.03 feet to a point on a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 633.00 feet and a radial hearing of North 38 East, said point being on the Northerly right - of-way of the E -NS ramp for Intergtate 90 (I -90). at Sullivan Road; thence Westerly through a central angle of 41 an arc distance of 454.98 feet; thence South 87 West, along said Northerly right -of -way 200.29 feet to the line between said Sections 13 and 14; thence continuing South 87 West along the Northerly right - of-way of the NSW ramp for I -90 at Sullivan 1048.61 feet to the Northerly right - of-way of said I -90; thence North 77 54'39" West, along said Northerly line, 216.86 feet; thence North 76 ° 55'02" West, along said Northerly line, 1550.20 feet; then North 76 10'41 " West, along said Northerly line, 620.00 feet; thence North 56 West, 778.50 feet; thence North 06 28'18" West 950.00feet to a point on a curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6684.56 feet and a radial bearing of South 06 ° 28'18" East, said point being on the Southerly right - of-way of the Union Pacific Railroa thence Easterly, along said right -of -way, throug3 a central angle of 11 an arc distance of 1316.56 feet; thence North 72'14'37" East, along said right- of-way 551.72 feet to a point on a curve concave.to Northeast with a radius of 964.95 feet and a radial Jeering of South 53 West, said point being on the southwesterly line of the State Parks Department Property as shown on Record of Survey filed in Survey Book 41, page 84; the next six courses are aiong said southwesterly line, thence southeasterly through a central angle of 9 28'38 ", an arc distance of 159.61 feet; thence south 45 East, 912.03 EXCEPT State Highway right -of -way. 2. General taxes for 1990, paid until February 15, (Assessor's Parcel No. 45113.9026; 45114.9031; - 2 - feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 2874.80 feet; thence southeasterly through a central angle of 11 ° 48'30 ", an arc ditance of 592.48 feet; thence South 57 26'08" East 588.09 feet; thence South 32` l West, 10.00 feet to the beginning of a nontangent curve concave to th Northeast with radius of 5749.58 feet and a radial bearing of 32` West; thence southeasterly through a central angle of 5‘"59'36", an arc distance of 601.43 feet to the westerly right-of-way of Sullivan Road;' thence South 03 East, along said Westerly right -of -way, 164.40 feet; thence South 02 ° 46'23" East, along said Westerly right -of -way, 37.28 feet; thence South 69 ° 57'29" East, 59.67 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington; Record Title is vested in R.A. Hanson Company,..Inc., a corporation, as to a strip of land 60 feet wide, being 30 feet upon each side, of the center of the Coeur d'Alene and Spokane Railway Company .railway line, as granted by deeds, Volume 143, Page 251, and Volume 143, page 272; and Whitworth. Foundation, a non -profit corporation, as to the remainder. SUBJECT TO: 1. Lien of real estate excise sales tax upon any sale of said premises, if unpaid. in the sum of $(not yet available), which cannot be 1990. 11543 -9026; 11544 -9031; 13542 -9040; 14541- 9170(old), 45132.9040; 45141.9170(new), Code 140) Said taxes affect: Section 11, Twp. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., as to portion of SW1 /4 lying South of SIRR R/W rrd Nly of PSH #2, subject to easement; Section 11, ¶1 p. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., as to portion of Gov't Tats 6 -10 and 11 lying Sly of SIRR R/W and SWly of Sally line of Inlaid Empire Paper Company WW and Nly of PSH #2 subject to easement; Section 13, Twp. 25 North, Range'44 E.W M , portion of Gov't Lots 3 and 4 described as follows: Beginning at intersection of South line of Inlarrg Empire Paper Co. RY WW and North line of Burlington Northern RY, thence N.61 02'04" West to North line of NW1 /4 thence west to east line of Sullivan Road, thence Sly along said East line to Nly line of PSH No.2, thence SE1y along said Nly line to south line of Gov't Lot 3, thence East along said south line to SE corner of said Gov't Lot 3, thence North to Nly line of Burlington Northern RY WW, thence Wly along said Nly line to point of beginning except RR R/W; Section 14, Twp. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., portion of NE1 /4 North of PSH #2. The real estate under search is assessed with other lands. The proposed segregation may require short platting pursuant to Spokane County Short Plat Ordinance. Inquiry should be made to the Spokane County Planning Department for compliance. 3. Irrigation assessment of $(not yet available), by Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19, for 1990. The first half will be delinquent April 30th. The last half will be delinquent October 31st, if unpaid. 4. Inquiry for any charges for irrigation, domestic water, electricity or other district c es made bye Consolidated Irrigation D phone 9 1 s should be made to said 5. Unrecorded Contract of Sale, constructive notice or disclosures of which is given by recital in instrument herein set forth. Disclosed by : Notice of Real Estate Contract Instrument Dated: Nay 31, 1978 Recorded : June 15, 1978 Auditor's No. : 7806150379 Contract Dated : May 31, 1978 Vendor Whitworth Foundation, a non -profit corporation Vendee : R.A. Hanson and Company, Inc., a corporation Affects : Said premises and other property 6 Decree of Appropriation filed February 5, 1986, in Spokane County Superior Court Cause Nos. 84202146 -7 and 84202145 -9, wherein the State of Washington appropriated portions of the Northeast quarter of Section 14, Government Lots 3 and 4 of the South half of the North half of Section 13, and the South half of Section 11 for Interstate 90. Said Decree states, in part, as follows: "TOGEIIThR WITH all rights of ingress and egress, if any (including all existing future or potential easements of access, light, view . and air) to, from, and between said SR 90 and the remainder of Tract "X". EXCEPT that there shall' be• reasonable ingress and egress to, from and between said Tract "X" and the Sullivan Road Line Survey of said SR 90 Northerly of HES 50+92.16 Lt. and HES 50+63.83 Rt. TOGETHER WITH the right to enter upon the respondents remaining lards, where necessary, to remove improvements, if any, located wholly or partially upon the right of way." 7. Effect of Relocation Agreement Dated : December 6, 1989 Recorded : December 13, 1989 Auditor's No. : 8912130174 By and Between: The United States of America, AND, The Consolidated Irrigation . District, AND, The R.A. Hanson ard.Company 8. Provisions contained in Order Including Lands and Redefining Boundaries of the Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19, regarding R.A. Hanson Company, Inc., recorded February 15, 1989, under auditor's file No. 8902150286. - 3 - 9. A perpetual easement for one or more electric power transmission lines granted to the United States of America, together with the right to clear said lard and to keep same clear of brush, timber, structures, and fire hazards. Width : 100 feet Recorded : June 8, 1959 Auditor's No. : 629711B Affects : Goverment Lots 6 and 11, said Section 11, and that part of the North 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4, the South 1/2 of the NE1 /4 of the NE1 /4 and the East 300 feet of the NW1 /4 of the NE1 /4 of Section 14. 10. Easement for pipeline for the transportation of oil, gas and the products thereof wherein the grantee agrees not to build, create or construct or to permit to be built, created or constructedany obstruction, building, engineering works, or other structures over or that would interfere with said pipeline. In Favor of : The Washington Water lower Company, a corporation Recorded : January 8, 1962 Auditor's No. : 831986B Affects : *see below * AFFECTS: That portion of Sections 11 and 14, lying Sly of the Sly right of way line of Spokane, Coeur d'Alene and Palouse Railroad (Great Northern) and Nly of Primary State Highway No. 2, as now located. A'15 foot permanent easement on the South 15 feet of said tract adjacent to the North line of the Freeway (P5H No. 2), the center line of the gas line to be 7 1/2 feet North of the edge of the Freeway right of way and installed with minimum cover of 48 inches. Minimum pipe cover 48 inches. 11. Easement for pipeline for the transportation of oil, gas and the products thereof wherein the- grantee agrees not to build, . create or construct or to permit to be built, created or constructed any obstruction, building, engineering works, or other structures over or that would interfere with said pipeline. In Favor of : The United States of America Recorded : June 22, 1965 Auditor's No. : 118205C Affects portion of said premises and other property - 4 - This report shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the certificate applied for. No Charge - 8 - TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Spokane County Office In Favor of Recorded Auditor's No. Affects 13. An easement herein, and For In Favor of Recorded Affects • - 5 - ti 12. An easement affecting the portion of said premises and for the purposes stated herein, and incidental purposes. For : The right, privilege and authority to install, reinstall, construct, erect, alter, repair, energize operate and maintain electric undergro und transmission and distribution facilities, consisting of vaults, manholes, handholes, ducts, conduits, cables, wires and other necessary or convenient apps; also the right, privilege, and authority to install, reinstall, construct, erect, alter, repair, energize, operate and maintain at ground level, electric transformer units, electric junction cabinets and/or; - containers, together with app necessary or convenient to . make said underground and surface installations an integrated electric system and in connection with all the foregoing to cut, trim, or chemically treat trees and shrubbery, to chip and spread branches and other foliage and to pile and stack logs as necessary alongside the cleared right -of -way in accordance with REA specifications, to the extent necessary to install and maintain said electric system. Inland Power & Light Co., a Washington corporation July 28, 1972 640587C *see below * AFFECTS: That portion of the South half of Section 11, lying North of Primary State Highway No. 90 and that portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM lying North of Primary State Highway No. 90- Line to be located within a strip of land lying 10 feet right and 10 feet left of the following described line: Beginning at a point which lies 752 feet North of the South line and'187 feet East of the West line of Section 11, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM; thence South 73 Fast paralleling the North right of way ling of Primary State Highway No. 90, a distance of 3255 feet, thence South 80 East 210 feet to a point 45 feet west of the east line og the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 14, thence North 3 West 1880 feet more or less to the 1987.2 feet contour line, North of the Spokane River and other property. affecting the portion of said premises and for the purposes stated incidental purposes. : the right to erect and maintain poles with the necessary wires and fixtures thereon, and to keep same free from foliage. : Pacific States Telephone and Telegraph Company : In Volume 165 of Deeds, Page 305 : The Southeast quarter of Section 11 NOTE: The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. has succeeded to rights granted by this easement. affecting the portion of said premises and for the purposes stated incidental purposes. : Transmission power line : Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad Company, a corporation : In Volume 344 of Deeds, Page 371 : The NE 1/4 of the NE1 /4 of Section 14. affecting the portion of said premises and for thejpurposes stated incidental purposes. : The Sullivan Road, County Road Project No. 116. : Spokane County : October 29, 1948 : In Volume 578 of Deeds, Page 370 : The East 30 feet of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, the East 30 feet of the SE1 /4 of. Section 11 16. A perpetual easement for one or more electric power transmission lines granted to the United States of America, together with the right to clear said lard and to keep same clear of brush, timber, structures; and fire hazards. Width : 150 feet Recorded : November 1, 1948 Auditor's No. : 847007A Affects : the South 1/2 of Section 11 17. Easement for pipeline for the transportation of oil, gas and the pn.ducts thereof wherein the grantee agrees not to build, create or construct or to permit to be built, created or constructed any obstruction, building, engineering works, or other structures over or that would interfere with said pipeline. In Favor of Recorded Auditor's No. Affects 14. An easement herein, and For - In Favor of Recorded Affects 15. An easement herein, and For In Favor of Dated Recorded Affects : The Washington Water Power Company : May 10, 1985 : 8505100167 : A 20 ft. strip of lard, Nly of and running parallel with and adjoining Washington State Highway SR -90, in the NW1 /4 of the NE1 /4 and the NE1 /4 of the NE1 /4, in Section 14. 18. Bill of Sale recorded December 27, 1940, under Auditor's File No. 472498A, between Inland Empire Paper Company, a corporation and the Washin ton Water Power Company, a corporation, for all of the electrical distribution lines of the first party located in Sections 12 and 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., in Spokane County, Washington; also all easements, right of ways, permits, privileges, and franchises and other licenses, contracts, and rights for or relating to the construction, maintenance and operation of said electrical distribution lines. - 6 - 19. An easement affecting the portion of said premises and for the purposes stated herein, and incidental purposes For : the right to reconstruct and maintain electrical distribu- tion lines. In Favor of : The Washington Water Power Company, a corporation Recorded : December 27, 1940 Auditor's No. : 472499A Affects : Lots 3 and 4 in the NW1 /4 of Section 13, Twp. 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M. 20. An easement affecting the portion of said premises and for the!Purposes stated herein, and incidental purposes. For : a perpetual easement for use as a public road; In Favor of : Spokane County Recorded : January 21, 1949 Auditor's No. : 859802A Affects : *see below *AFFECTS: a strip of land 30 feet wide on each side of and parallel with the center line of Sullivan Road, and the West 30 feet of that portion of the northwest quarter of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., that lies North of the Spokane Valley Irrigation District canal. 21. Relinquishment of right of amps to state highway and of light, view and air, under terms of Deed to the State of Washington. Recorded : September 28, 1955 Auditor's No. : 344727B Affects : Lots 3 and 4, Section 13 22. Right of Entry Executed By In Favor Of Recorded Auditor's No. FOR: Right of entry and privilege and permit of ingress and egress over, across and upon the hereinafter described lands and further, permission to connect into the manhole which has been installed by Permitter and is located on Sullivan Road South of the SR 90 /Sullivan Interchange at the intersection of Mission Avenue and Sullivan Road; from date hereof until completion of construction for the purpose of installation of said sewer distribution line within the right of way as now staked upon the ground. AFFECTS: The NW1 /4 of the NW1 /4 of Section 13, and the SW1/4 of the SW1 /4 of Section 12, all in Twp. 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M. NC/TES : : Hanson Properties, Inc. : The Washington Water Power Company, and/or its subsidiaries and assigns and in particular to Spokane Industrial Park Incorporated. : September 19, 1985 :.8509190152 1. Aquifer protection fees that may be due and payable in accordance with Chapter 36.36 RCW. (Specific amounts may be obtained from the County Utility Department, phone #458 - 2538). - 7 - • . , -.. FACSIMILE . TRANSMISSION •. Founded 1946 oimpson PrigIneers, Inc. . . Civil Engineering, Land Surveying 8 Land Planning . Date.. , stole (get ,. T . . 2 d No of pages Oblittit 4 ( To ta3632StY SIN.429, From AJW02; PlAuJ.4>ca korrNacera v5 loAOr laimtlifutat LEIGO4L— fie. IP 0 s le,4413/4 h4VC WeEr5i or ,ttaaVs6.4.4 coarse_ , . Baiss-Ar Pa:Novo-pi A4. kar Mt Va..sou..1 to CCO-LE-Atri-stew. , Clarence E Simpson Engineers, Inc.' (509) 926-1322 N 909 Argonne Road Spokane WA 99212-2789 ' Fax (509) 926-1323; MAR 14 '90 08:46 SIMPSON'ENG: • 212 P01 • •7 C MAR 14 '90 08:47 SIMPSON ENG. m-4' 1 - 212 P02 RIGHT OF WAY DESCRIPTION INDIANA AVENUE • WEST OF SULLIVAN PARR CENTER , A strip of land over . a portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 11 and the SE 1/4 of Section T.25 N., R.44 E.W.M., the centerline of which is described as follows: Begin at the NE corner of Section 14, T.25 N., R.44 E.W.M; thence S 0246'23 "E, along the East line of said Section, 140.61 feet to, the centerline of proposed Indiana Avenue; thence N 81 ° 15'36 "W 692.40 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Northeast with a radius of 955.00 feet; thence . Northwesterly through a central angle of 57 ° 15'36" an arc distance of 954.40 feet; thence N 24 ° 00'00 "W 220.00 feet to the beginning of a curve concave tn_ the Southwest with a radius of 955.00.feet; thence Northwesterly through a central angle of 29 ° 07'01 ", an arc distance of 485.32; thence N 53 ° 07'01 "W 334.35 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 1500.00 feet; thence Northwesterly through a central angle of 50 ° 13'37 ", an arc dist- ance of 1314.94 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 6731.56 feet; thence Westerly through a central angle of 06 ° 52'20 ", an arc distance of 807.40 feet to the True Point of Beginning at which the right of way North of the centerline is 47.00 feet and South of the centerline is 37.00 feet, said point being the Westerly line of the proposed plat of- Sullivan Park Center; thence continuing Westerly, along said curve, through a central angle of 2 ° 39'55 ", an arc distance of 313.14 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the Southeast with a radius of 1500.00 feet, at said point the right t of way North of the centerline changes from 47.00 feet to 37.00 feet; thence Southwesterly through a central angle of 20 ° 09'40 ", an arc distance of 527. "82 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 1500.00 feet; thence Southwesterly through a central angle of 21 ° 20'29 ", an arc distance of 558.72 feet to a point 47.00 feet North of the South line of the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 10, at said point the right of way South of the centerline changes from 37.00 feet to 47.00 feet; thence S 87'22 "W, parallel with said South line 2188.94 feet to the East line of Shannon Avenue (No.280) and the end of said described centerline. The side line of said described right of way to be extended or shortened to meet said East line. �:. a Washington State Department of Transportation District 6 North 2714 Mayfair Street P.O. Box 5299 North Central Station Spokane. Washington 99205 -0299 (509) 456 -3000 Ron Hormann Spokane County Engineers North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Mr. Hormann: April 20, 1990 Re: SR 90, Sullivan Road Interchange Modification Duane Berentson Secretary of Transportation Please be advised that the District has reviewed and approved the Quitclaim Deed for conveyance to the Department. The deeds have been forwarded to Headquarters for signature. JRB:db JFP Very truly yours, JAMES R. BUSS, P.E. District Administrator . c „ By: JOHN F. PIERSON District R/W Supervisor AgaMP " ,oftwe i s4;i440; , ,h-wk‘44-.,4; : • te4 4.4,..11; SAO • ':;•'•'&' *4- tt. C noti,,g- •i 044Deeds Department:: .....-Thet,deeds- ha v evbeeriforvia rded o, , 4,% , ,, '''''' V.vatf n...e.s.: +.m...P,4 fretkw,„ ,,-,r,... ., ,,s, r ..71:4, F.44 Rteaset,bepadViiisedkthat#Di ctlhaskA2revfeweqand '„ approved i t 'Clain: ...,1'i ' . 1 q":'“:.?' r ...,,41 ' •Le „,„ .,,,.; .y a - 44, k q Li gr ter s A e t: .i .:4 , ii4.:.-......:,eg - -i., , ,: , ‘e. 5 . : y e niarir-0,Ait• .:„..../ 4' 1, . C Mt ' 4 ' ' : ;',21 a. 1•I - 4 - t - Very ';'.=.'Erii 1 y 'yours; .1 t,H, ' ''. •':6' ...;': ..;'; 4 4 l'ixr4 \,1 r 4. it jetA ' . i ." ": • 1., i f , ,r , • ■ • AME S,4Rs'kkBU Di strTC ni s'tra , • Xt. RS'ON Di strict: R/W Supervi sots .i• ; F.; • 11 t EY 1;.,Ce : ;bp • • • • Oob have id chan iq Ike nl mar PIeaL.e review I vv di pion e , ov \Neii .cla worn 10 ;ce i 1 1 I 'Ore h isf - e]: I A - 19 n1 Mushier '?L? n Ttani { v revie'.v 'a cop Than �.�� Pis rr II tt nA Ij rr;ii: )i;e"t TRANSPORTATION Background A detailed transportation analysis of the proposed Sullivan Park Center was prepared in 1980 as a component of the original environmental impact statement (EIS). That transportation study included estimates of trip generation and distribution, traffic assignments, capacity analysis and a proposed mitigation plan to reduce adverse impacts on the surrounding roadway network. The ultimate development of the site and nature of land uses being considered in this supplementary EIS are tabulated in Table I in the summary, and can be compared to those of the original project, Table II. The current proposal includes development in three phases, while the original project was to be constructed in two phases. The original EIS traffic analysis determined that several improvements would be required to support the additional travel demands created by the combined effects of through and project traffic. Foremost among these was the need for reconstruction of the Interstate 90 interchange serving Sullivan Road to provide additional capacity. In this respect, the EIS recommended that an "urban interchange" be constructed at this location, and that it be combined with a grade separation of the Burlington Northern railroad tracks which roughly parallel 1 -90. A schematic drawing of the urban interchange proposal from the original EIS is shown in Appendix A. That EIS also recognized the need to 'widen Sullivan Road north of 1 -90, extend Indiana Avenue through the site, and signalize the Sullivan /Indiana intersection. In March 1981, the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee issued its findings and conditions related to the approval of the original EIS. The EIS examined the impacts of rezoning from Agricultural to Restricted Industrial land use under the zoning classifica- tions applicable at that time. With respect to transportation, the Committee did not make a specific recommendation regarding the urban interchange concept for applica- tion at the 1 -90 /Sullivan interchange. The text of the Committee decisions is included in Appendix A. During the review of the original EIS, both the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and the Spokane County Engineering Department expressed 8 concerns regarding the urban interchange. The urban interchange is an unconventional design which has been applied only in Florida, Kentucky and Georgia. It serves turning movements at the ramp terminals through a single signalized intersection directly above or below the freeway mainline. This design is particularly well- suited to areas with limited right -of -way availability and /or crossing arterials with at -grade intersec- tions in close proximity to ramp terminals. The concerns of the county engineering staff at that time were related to the uncertainty about the feasibility and funding of the urban interchange design. Specifi- cally, in October 1980, WSDOT indicated their long -range plans to upgrade the existing diamond interchange at the 1 -90 /Sullivan location, since right -of -way for such a reconstruction was readily available. In addition, approval of modifications to the interstate system requires the approval of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and it was not certain such a design would be acceptable. By mid -1983 WSDOT had begun preliminary planning of the upgraded I -90 /Sullivan interchange. In their analysis of the capacity of the urban interchange alternative, it was estimated that the intersection system along Sullivan Road proposed in the original EIS could not accommodate the combined demands of growth in through traffic and the added project traffic. This analysis revealed that the capacity of the urban interchange did not represent a significant improvement over that of an upgraded diamond interchange. The WSDOT concerns were detailed in a memorandum dated May 1983 also included in Appendix A. During 1983 and 1984, WSDOT proceeded in the development of an upgraded diamond design for the I -90 /Sullivan interchange. Agency planners concluded that neither the urban or diamond interchanges could adequately serve the ultimate size and mix of development proposed for Sullivan Park Center. In meetings among the proponent, WSDOT and the county, a phasing plan was developed to limit impacts at the I -90 /Sullivan interchange and on Sullivan Road.. This supplementary EIS assesses traffic impacts of the revised phasing plan as currently proposed, updates the projections of the original EIS, and provides a description of roadway modifications to mitigate potential adverse traffic impacts. Phasing Plan The two major factors considered in developing the proposed phasing schedule (see Table I in the Summary) were 1) economically feasible development staging of a regional shopping center and hotel and 2) traffic capacity and timing of major access improvements. 9 The proposed Phase 1 development provides for an initial retail center with three major department stores, and for the full development of a 300 -room hotel. With the completion of the current improvements to the Sullivan Road interchange, along with signalization of an intersection at Sullivan Road and an extended Indiana Avenue, adequate traffic capacity would exist to support this first phase. The alternative Phase I would include a retail center with two major department stores, one -half of the proposed hotel, and about 110,000 square feet of business park. This mix of uses would have similar worst -case traffic impacts and could be accommodated with the same access improvements. Beyond either of these first phases, additional access capacity would be needed. The most effective single improvement would be the construction of an additional 1 -90 interchange approximately one mile west of Sullivan Road. This interchange, plus additional extensions of Indiana Avenue, provide capacity to support the proposed Phase II development (see Table I). A regional shopping center with four or five major department stores, peripheral retail development, the 300 -room hotel and approxi- mately 300,000 square feet each of business park and industrial park development can be accommodated with the additional interchange, maintaining acceptable traffic conditions. The final phase of development would require further access improvements. With the new interchange in place, the connections to the south (to Evergreen Road) and possibly to the north would provide enough relief to allow Sullivan Road to perform adequately with full site development. The coordination of project phasing with access improvements should provide adequate control of traffic impacts. It is in the best interest of both the sponsor and the developers of the specific uses proposed, as well as the county and the state, to phase the improvements so that employees, tenants and customers are not adversely affected by local traffic conditions. Existing Conditions The existing roadway network in the site vicinity was described in detail in the original EIS. The roadway inventory data remains current, and updated traffic counts are presented in Figure 3. Traffic counts were supplied by Spokane County Engineering Department and WSDOT and represent a composite of the available daily and peak hour volumes during 1982 and 1983. Using the 1978 -79 counts as a baseline, the growth in background traffic was computed to be between 3 and 5 percent annually. 10 • 0 a • • c A . O O co v O 1-90 Broadway Avenue Sprague Avenue 0 1/2 Euclid Avenue SULLIVAN PARK CENTER 0000 vehicles per day Existing Daily Traffic Volumes Wilsey & Ham Figure 3 Accident patterns at the I -90 /Sullivan ramps reflect the increasingly congested conditions at this interchange. The two ramp terminals probably meet the traffic signal warrants for uninterrupted traffic suggested in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). With the current WSDOT construction project, both ramp terminals will be signalized. These actions should improve the accident experience at these intersections. Future Conditions Without the Project Projections of future background traffic volumes in the project vicinity were derived from WSDOT, County Engineering Department and Spokane Regional Planning Confer- ence (SRPC) sources. In WSDOT's 1 -90 Corridor Study, average daily traffic on 1 -90 for the year 2002 has been projected according to historical growth trends. To insure a conservative analysis, WSDOT year 2002 projections were utilized for the year 2000 traffic analysis in this EIS. The projected average daily traffic (A DT) on 1 -90 west of Sullivan Road is estimated to increase from the existing 30,000 vehicles per day (vpd) to , 56,000 vpd, and from 23,000 vpd to 41,000 vpd east of Sullivan Road. These traffic projections are currently in a preliminary stage of development, and may change slightly with final publication this summer. A parallel study by the SRPC has produced uniformly lower traffic estimates on the freeway. It should be noted that the current projections are significantly lower than those used in the original EIS. That document anticipated 80,700 vpd on 1 -90 west of Sullivan, and 71,600 vpd east of the Sullivan interchange. These figures included the traffic impacts of a second regional shopping center and extensive residential development to the south. The proposed second regional center was to be located east of Sullivan Road and north of Broadway Avenue. The Valley Mall would have included 650,000 square feet of gross leasable area plus additional peripheral commercial, office and restaurant space. The traffic study for the Valley Mall was prepared in 1978, projecting 31,240 daily trip ends, with 1,180 inbound trips and 1,275 outbound trips in the 4:00 to 5:00 pm peak hour. Approximatley 45 percent of these trips were forecast to pass through the 1 -90 /Sullivan Road interchange. The traffic study for the Valley Mall was based on 1976 traffic counts and a 1985 completion date, so that the projections of that study are outdated and no longer applicable to the current situation. The zoning approval for the Valley Mall is scheduled to expire in October 1985 and no application for an extension of this approval is being processed. The earlier traffic 12 analyses for Sulli ;n Park Center did not specifically consider traffic related to Valley Mall, since it is likely that only one such center could be supported in the Spokane Valley. A regional center such as that under consideration requires a market population of 100,000 to 150,000 persons. The population forecasts for the year 2000 indicate approximately this population for the eastern Washington and northern Idaho market area. Thus, it is likely that only one regional center could be economically justified in this area. Traffic volume growth on Sullivan Road was derived from earlier projections by the Spokane Regional Planning Conference. These estimates reflect traffic growth in the range of 3 to 5 percent. The projections do not appear to be affected by revisions in the freeway volume projections, nor are the ramp volumes significantly affected. Projections of average daily traffic for 1990, 1995 and 2000 without the project are shown in Figure 4. Traffic operations at the intersections along Sullivan Road for these conditions are summarized in Table III. TABLE III INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE* 1990 1995 2000 Sullivan /South Ramps A A A Sullivan /North Ramps A A A *Level of service is a qualitative measure which describes operating conditions occurring on a given roadway or intersection. Levels of service (LOS) range from LOS A to LOS F with LOS A denoting free flow, low volumes and adequate traveling speeds. LOS F, on the other hand, describes forced flow operation at substantially reduced travel speeds and congested traffic volumes. LOS C is generally used as the design capacity under rural conditions and LOS D under urban conditions. The capacity analyses were performed using the reconstructed I -90 /Sullivan inter- change geometrics which are currently under construction. The need for additional freeway capacity in the 1 -90 Corridor Study is being studied by WSDOT. That study may determine the need for six - laning of 1 -90 in the vicinity of the site. The existing cross - section and bridge structures along 1 -90 are such that widening could be accomplished by adding median lanes in the existing right -of -way. 13 E - 44800 53800 64000 \ I -90 40100 47300 56000 Broadway Avenue Sprague Avenue 18600 21800 26000 •21900 26200 31400 42000 0 28800 34700 112 Euclid Avenue , 1 -90 1 ml. SULLIVAN PARK CENTER 1990 vehicles per day 1995 • • . 2000 Projected Daily Traffic Volumes without the project Wilsey & Ham Figure 4 In the long range, the county is planning to widen Sullivan Road to six lanes south of 1 -90. No schedule has been established for this project, nor has funding been identified. It is expected to be completed by the year 2000. The widening would extend from Sprague Avenue north to the southernmost 1 -90 ramp, but would not continue through the 1 -90 interchange. The levels of service computations did not consider this widening of Sullivan Road, since it is not a programmed project. Project Traffic Impacts The impacts of the proposed project are analyzed in three phases for the years 1990, 1995 and 2000. The study for this supplemental EIS includes an analysis of daily and pm peak hour conditions for these years, accounting for the combined effects of the growth in background traffic and the addition of project - related traffic. Trip generation associated with development of the site, the distribution of trips throughout the region, assignment of new trips to the surrounding roadway network, and the ability of the roadway system to accommodate future traffic volumes have been examined. There have been significant changes in traffic conditions and projections since the earlier studies. These changes include the addition of a larger ultimate (year 2000) development phase, reconstruction of the 1 -90 /Sullivan interchange (currently under- way), revisions to future background traffic forecasts, and revisions to population and employment forecasts within the market area. Trip Generation Estimates of trip generation were derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (1TE) document Trip Generation (third edition). Daily and peak hour forecasts for project - related traffic are summarized in Table IV. A total of approxi- mately 27,000 daily vehicle trip ends are projected for Phase I, 47,000 in Phase II, and 59,000 in Phase III. The directional trip estimates for the afternoon peak hour are also presented for each phase. An alternative first phase is also under consideration by the proponent, and is described in Table I in the Summary. The trip generation of this alternative Phase I would be 27,250 daily trips, and 1,200 outbound trips in the pm peak. Thus, the critical volume of peak -hour traffic would be nearly identical in either plan. 15 Land Use Phase I PM Peak Daily Trip Building Area Ends (vpd) TABLE IV PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Phase II Phase 111 PM Peak - PM Peak Trips (vph) Daily Trip Trips (vph) Daily Trip Trips (vph) In Out Building Area Ends (vpd) In Out Building Area Ends (vpd) In Out Commercial 650,000 sq.ft. 24,180 1,034 1,073 1,038,000 sq.ft. 38,510 1,053 1,972 1,348,000 sq.ft. 05,984 1.083 1,901 Business Park 294,000 sq.ft. 3,205 71 329 390,030' sq.ft. 6,268 94 703 Hotel 300 rooms 3,150 108 111 300 rooms 3,150 108 III 300 rooms 3,150 108 III Industrial Park _ _ 330,000 sq.ft. 1,802 106 208 800,000 sq.ft. 3.505 235 504 Total 27,330 1,102 1,184 06,667 1,738 2,820 58,907 1,900 3,219 Trip Distribution Trips were assigned to the roadway network on the basis of zonal population forecasts prepared by the Spokane Regional Planning Conference in February 1985. These forecasts include both population and employment predictions for the years 1990, 1995 and 2000. Population forecasts were also obtained for Kootenai County, Idaho to reflect the eastern portion of the market area. A simplified gravity model was used to distribute trips among these zones, using travel time as a measure of impedance. Compared to the original US, the Spokane County population forecasts for the year 2000 have remained relatively stable at approximately 412,000 persons, although there have been slight changes among zones. However, the Kootenai County long -range forecasts have been revised from 85,000 persons in the original EIS to 72,000 in this current study, resulting in a significant drop in patrons and employees attracted from the east. Separate trip distribution estimates were prepared for different trip purposes. For retail, commercial and hotel trips, the market area is constrained on the west by competing commercial opportunities in the Spokane CBD and close -in suburbs. Work trips for on -site employees at the business and industrial parks are attracted from a broader area. Overall, approximately 27 percent of the trips approach the site on 1 -90 from the west, 17 percent on 1 -90 from the east, and 30 percent on Sullivan Road from the south. Sixteen percent approach on Sullivan Road from the north, and 10 percent on Pines Road from the north and south. 16 Traffic Assignment Vehicular traffic was assigned to the roadway network using the trip distribution estimates described above. The traffic assignments vary according to the mix of development in each phase, the location of specific land uses on the site, and the roadway system configuration in each phase. For instance, some traffic related to the business park uses at the far western end of the project will use the 1 -90 interchange at Pines Road, but traffic to the industrial park at the eastern end of the site will use the 1 -90 interchange at Sullivan Road. During Phase 1 of the project, nearly all the site - related traffic from 1 -90 will use the Sullivan interchange. In the Phase 11 development, there is a potential for additional freeway access at a new interchange midway between the existing Pines and Sullivan interchanges. By Phase III, additional connections of the surface streets are possible. Several alternatives are presented on Figure 5. On the east end, Indiana Avenue could ultimately be extended to Flora Road, with an intersection at Mission Avenue. At the proposed new 1 -90 /Evergreen Road interchange, both northward and southward connections may be feasible. To the south, the interchange could connect to the arterial network at Evergreen Road, if the difficult topographic constraints can be overcome. To the north, this street could extend across the railroad tracks to Pines Road or across the Spokane River to a terminus to be established in future planning. It should be emphasized that none of these long -range projects are indicated in the county's transportation plans, and are therefore not programmed or funded. Implemen- tation of these improvements could occur through commitments of the proponent and other developers, county and /or state actions, or combinations of both. The focus of the interchange alternatives is to examine the systemwide need for additional north- south arterial capacity, and to provide relief for the Pines and Sullivan corridors. These alternatives will be refined, and others developed, during the planning process. The traffic assignments were performed to account for the phased implementation of roadway improvements in the vicinity of the site. A proposed scenario of improvements is presented in Figure 5. In the traffic assignment procedure, the extension of Indiana Avenue eastward to Sullivan Road was assumed to be constructed in Phase I, together with the slip ramp connections to the 1 -90 /Sullivan interchange. For Phase II, traffic assignments were prepared with and without the proposed new 1 -90 interchange. In this phase, the interchange would be connected to the north only as far as the Indiana Avenue extension. 17 • 0 w e c n ,,,,m vm,nm„ fffffffffffffffffffff • Alignme t Alternativ e..' • • - Phase 1 -90 Oft fffffff /mote.. hase II • W Broadway Avenue Phase HI Sprague Avenue 0 ffff 1/2 Euclid Avenue' 1 -90 1 ml. SULLIVAN PARK CENTER ---phase I ----phase H wn,mm,.mm phase III Proposed Road Improvements & Alternatives Wilsey & Ham Figure 5 The traffic assignments for Phase III examined two potential street connections which could be completed by the year 2000 planning horizon. First, the assignments included a connection from the new interchange south to Evergreen Road. For this phase, estimates of diversions of through traffic from the Pines and Sullivan corridors were not available, so a systemwide traffic assignment was not performed. Instead, a sketch plan was prepared to determine the project - related traffic using Evergreen Road. Second, Indiana Avenue might be extended eastward to Flora Road. The Phase III traffic assignments did not include this connection, but a sketch plan analysis was prepared to address this issue, due to the uncertainties inherent in these long -range forecasts. Projections of future daily traffic with the project are shown on Figure 6 for each phase of development. A detailed analysis of pm peak -hour volumes along Sullivan Road also was conducted. These estimates of turning movements for each phase are provided in Appendix B. The assignments of trips to the roadway system accounted for "captured" traffic which is already using the network in the vicinity of the site for some other purpose. These captured trips do not represent the introduction of new traffic, but rather the diversion of trips from other retail areas. In this analysis, a capture rate of 15 percent was assumed for retail traffic. Capacity Analysis Using the forecasts of background traffic and project traffic, capacity computations were prepared to determine traffic operations on surrounding roadways. Included in the detailed capacity analyses are the 1 -90 freeway and the system of signalized intersec- tions on Sullivan Road. Conditions were examined for the pm peak hour for each analysis year. The 1 -90 analysis was based on the 1965 Highway Capacity Manual, and accounted for the effects of weaving maneuvers on the freeway mainline. Capacity analysis for the intersections was accomplished using CAPCALC, an intersection capacity analysis program based on the critical movement methodology in the Transpor- tation Research Board Circular 212. The analysis for Phase I of the development reflects the presence of signalization at both 1 -90 ramp terminals on Sullivan Road and at the proposed Indiana Avenue intersection. The preliminary design for the proposed interim connections of the slip ramps has been developed in cooperation with WSDOT and county engineering, as indicated on Figure 7. This configuration reduces weaving maneuvers on Sullivan Road. 1990 traffic operations, with the completion of Phase 1, are summarized below: 19 • 51200 64840 78042 • • cc 0 • • e • 1 -90 46439 56747 67725 1 Broadway Avenue Sprague Avenue 22392 28343 34322 .29010 38467 47003 32629 41651 50841 t/2 Euclid Avenue 1 -90 SULLIVAN PARK CENTER 1990 vehicles per day 1995 2000 • . • It Projected Daily Traffic Volumes with the project Wilsey & Ham Figure 6 SULLIVAN PARK CENTER Sullivan Road Intersection Plan Phase Wilsey a, Ham Figure 7 TABLE V PHASE I INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE 1990 - with the project Sullivan /south ramps Sullivan /north ramps Sullivan /Indiana Level of Service V/C Ratio* *v /c ratio indicates volume divided by capacity of the roadway. On the 1 -90 freeway west of Sullivan Road, traffic operations will be maintained at level of service C. In general, level of service D is an acceptable condition during peak hours in urban areas. - The Phase II capacity analysis was performed with and without the proposed new interchange, using 1995 traffic forecasts. In addition, the extension of Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road will require modification, as shown on Figure 8. Sullivan /south ramps Sullivan /north ramps Sullivan /Indiana TABLE VI PHASE II INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE 1995 - with the project Without Proposed Interchange Level of Service V/C Ratio D C E These results indicate that supplementary freeway access will be desirable to serve the combined demands of background and project traffic during the second phase of project development. An earlier analysis by WSDOT in 1984 confirmed this finding, determin- ing that the first phase level of development was the maximum which could be served through the upgraded I -90 /Sullivan interchange. 22 B B D 0.80 0.76 0.96 With Proposed Interchange Level of Service V/C Ratio B C D 0.62 0.60 0.89 0.68 0.71 0.89 SULLIVAN PARK CENTER Sullivan Road Intersection Plan Phases II and III Wilsey & Horn Figure 8 The proposed new 1 -90 interchange would be located between the Pines and Sullivan interchanges. The spacing will create weaving sections on 1 -90, caused by the proximity of adjacent entrance and exit ramps. The I -90 analysis focused on these weaving areas as being the critical links from a capacity viewpoint. In the 1995 pm peak, the freeway weaving sections will operate at level of service C with two directional lanes, and at level of service A if an additional auxiliary lane is provided. Presented in Table VII, the Phase III project impacts also were evaluated with and without the proposed new 1 -90 interchange. In the long range, there is projected to be a serious deterioration in service levels without the proposed new interchange. The Phase III analysis also indicates that a connection from the new interchange south to Evergreen Road would be desirable. From a system point of view, such an action would relieve both the Pines and Sullivan arterial corridors and interchanges. Up to five percent of total project traffic would utilize the Evergreen corridor. This level of project traffic would translate to an additional daily traffic load of approximately 3,000 vpd, and 260 total vehicles in the pm peak hour. While the project could double the ADT on Evergreen Road to 5,000 or 6,000 vpd, the combined traffic demand could still be accommodated at level of service B on a two -lane road. Signalization of the Mission /Evergreen intersection would be required if significant through- traffic volumes are attracted to this corridor. Sullivan /south ramps Sullivan /north ramps Sullivan /Indiana TABLE VII PHASE III INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE 2000 - with the project Without Proposed Interchange Level of Service V/C Ratio E D F 24 0.90 0.86 1.02 With Proposed Interchange and Evergreen Connection(s) Level of Service V/C Ratio C D D 0.77 0.80 0.89 A similar situation exists with the connection of Indiana Avenue to Flora Road. Less than five percent of project traffic would utilize this access route, but that level of project traffic could triple the total traffic volume on Flora Road south of Mission Avenue. However, traffic can be served at level of service C on this two -lane facility. Operating conditions on 1 -90 with the Phase III traffic will be at level of service D if two directional lanes are provided in the weaving area, and level of service C if an auxiliary lane is provided east of the new interchange. Mitigating Measures and Design Considerations The traffic impact analysis has been structured to examine roadway improvement needs through a 15 -year planning horizon of project development. The original EIS recognized the need to reconstruct the I -90 /Sullivan interchange to serve the total traffic demands projected for the area. Additional traffic planning studies in 1983 and 1984 with WSDOT and county engineering further advanced the concept of phased development and staged implementation of roadway improvements. It was during this time that the plan for the ramp modifications at the I -90 /Sullivan interchange was developed. These slip ramps were designed to be constructed without major changes to the interchange construction which is currently underway. Also, required in Phase 1 is the extension of Indiana Avenue eastward to Sullivan Road, and signalization of the Sullivan /Indiana intersection. The preliminary design of improvements along Sullivan Road is influenced by the limited distance (approximately 600 feet) between the four -lane Spokane River bridge crossing and the 1 -90 north ramp terminal. There is currently a Burlington Northern (BN) rail crossing within this area, and WSDOT.. requires that adjacent intersections be located at least 300 feet from the nearest ramp terminal. In 1984, a plan was developed to locate the Indiana Avenue intersection midway between the ramp terminal and the bridge crossing, and to relocate the BN crossing north of the proposed Sullivan /Indiana intersection. By early 1985, it was revealed that BN is contemplating abandonment of the rail spur in this area. Currently, few trains utilize this spur, which serves fewer than four businesses near Barker Road. The spur has already been abandoned east of Barker Road. Burlington Northern has indicated that it will file for abandonment during the summer of 1985. In addition, WSDOT is requesting that the Sullivan Road grade crossing be eliminated with their current construction contract. These actions will maximize the capacity of the intersection system along Sullivan Road. The proposed new 1 -90 interchange design has been developed conceptually and is being considered among the improvement alternatives in WSDOT's 1 -90 Corridor Study. The 25 WSDOT study is examining systemwide 1 -90 improvements, and the emphasis in the immediate vicinity is to relieve the congested conditions in the Pines Road corridor. Any proposed widening or interchange improvements along 1 -90 are subject to review and approval by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). In addition, an independent environmental review is required prior to any improvements to the interstate system, under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). During Phase 11 of the project, the proposed interchange would be connected north only to the Indiana Avenue extension. The proximity of the new interchange to the major on -site traffic generators will divert a significant amount of traffic from the Sullivan interchange, and a lesser amount from the Pines interchange. The connection of Evergreen Road to the proposed 1 -90 interchange is a system alternative which could effectively serve the needs of through traffic and project traffic. Other alternatives may be available to accomplish the same system objectives, and these will need to be identified and evaluated in a design study. Currently, Evergreen Road is designated as a major arterial in the county's functional classification plan. It is consistent with the general one -mile spacing of arterials in the Spokane Valley. Evergreen Road is a two -lane facility north of Sprague Avenue, passing mainly through residential areas, and terminating at Mission Avenue. Preliminary estimates indicate that the connection from 1 -90 to the Mission /Evergreen intersection could be accomplished with grades ranging from 4 to 8 percent. (See Appendix C.) Additional study will be needed to investigate the design details of this proposed facility, and its related environmental and community impacts. A similar situation exists with the possible connections to the north from this interchange. None of these future connections is precluded by development of the site. The possible extension of Indiana Avenue eastward to Flora Road is also a long -range improvement alternative. The county is considering a bridge across' the Spokane River to connect Flora Road northward to the adjacent industrial park. Flora Road also could be served by 1 -90 if ramps could be constructed at the existing undercrossing. However, WSDOT is not examining this option in their current 1 -90 Corridor Study. The potential of Flora Road to serve the needs of through traffic and project traffic would be significant if both these improvements were implemented. 26 Summary of Transportation Improvements The conceptual approach to improvement of the transportation network is presented on Figure 5. These improvements, together with appropriate signalization and other traffic control devices, will mitigate the adverse impacts of the project and provide enhanced circulation and safety for through traffic. At this stage in the planning process, costs of construction and right -of -way acquisition have not been prepared. The project proponent will construct the on -site roadway improvements to county design standards and dedicate the associated right -of -way. In addition, the proponent will bear responsibility for numerous off -site improvements. However, the sponsor will seek the participation of the county in those improvements which offer significant benefits to non - project traffic. In addition, the burden of responsibility for off -site costs can affect the economic feasibility and success of the future project phases. Thus, implementation of the off -site improvements will require the cooperation of the county. The specific roadway improvements proposed for Phase 1 include construction of Indiana Avenue as a two -lane facility in the western portion of the site, and as a four -lane divided facility east to Sullivan Road. The right -of -way width will vary between 70 and 100 feet, depending on slope and drainage requirements. The intersection at Sullivan ? Road will be signalized, and the I -90 /Sullivan interchange modified as shown on Figure 7. In advance of the implementation of Phase I!, the proponent will prepare a design report for the proposed new 1 -90 interchange at Evergreen Road. This design report will fulfill the county's requirement for updating of the traffic forecasts after the completion of Phase 1. In addition, the design report will comply with WSDOT and FHWA guidelines to evaluate the various design options for the interchange. The capacity analyses indicate that the connection of the proposed interchange south to Evergreen Road will not be required until Phase 111 of the project. However, the design report will examine options for earlier implementation of this connection. Obviously, the timing of this improvement is closely linked to that of the county's proposed widening of Sullivan Road south of 1 -90, and that project also must be considered in the design report. The roadway improvements for Phase 11 include construction of the proposed new I - /Evergreen interchange with a two -lane bridge crossing, together with the asso- ciated auxiliary weaving lanes eastward to the Sullivan interchange ramps. Evergreen Road will be constructed as a four -lane divided section north from the new interchange 27 All new I to Indiana Avenue. In Phase II, Indiana Avenue will be widened from two lanes to five lanes in the western portion of the site. The Sullivan /Indiana intersection and the I -90 /Sullivan interchange will be modified as shown on Figure 8 and Indiana Avenue will be extended eastward from Sullivan Road as a five -lane section. The technical analysis indicates that the south connection to Evergreen Road from the proposed new 1 -90 interchange is not needed to relieve Sullivan Road until Phase III. However, the disposition of this long -term recommendation will ultimately be addressed in the interchange design report. The preliminary analysis indicates that the connection is feasible, and three alternative alignments are presented on Figure 5. This connection would be a two -lane roadway on a grade between 4 and 8 percent. The need for traffic control devices at the intersection with Mission Avenue will be determined in the design report. The connections of Evergreen Road northward from Indiana Avenue were not specifi- cally considered in the technical analysis. None of these connections is required to support the Sullivan Park Center project. The alternatives shown on Figure 5 are intended to demonstrate that future northward extensions of Evergreen Road are not precluded by implementation of the development proposal. In all phases, implementation of roadway improvements intended for dedication will pass through several levels of review by the appropriate county, state and federal agencies. These location and design reviews will provide additional opportunities for interaction with the proponent regarding details of the specific improvements. 28 TO: 6A9-4 S. NELSDN I RE, SPOKANE COUNTY E/461NEEF2r SUBJECT: SULIIVAN PAtzl< CENTett DATE Dec. is H909 A4 - adned Vor y our re.vlew ar fr vv1 o f ttie revised sei av A dreSvtage plats `\r ay.diavtct Ave. Also, lAelgskA are -l adcli+■kyvial sireet av drainage stiee 5 av■.d codes of the eorvresrond,1'vi3 dro ivtctse. ca[etdk 3vis. CLARENUIZ E. SIMPSON ENGINEERS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS N. 909 Argonne Road Spokane, Washington 99212 Telephone: 926 -1322 Fax: 926 -1323 Signed Gry ivvi uf44 1 SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE RE: Gentlemen: GSN287:sla Attachment f w i �lU%.� 1s - 0 `i Thank, you. Cr 1 If. (11 COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SIP oaaar_ 'WAS iIIIINGTON 99260 �l - ) ' - P1 Date: A review of the road, drainage, and parking plans for the above- refer- enced plat, short plat, binding site plan, and /or building permit has been accomplished. Areas of concern to us are indicated in red on the attached prints. Please make the corrections and resubmit them to this office in order that the review process may proceed. When the plans are resubmitted, mark all changes on the revised print in color. If you have any questions about this review, please contact us at 456 -3600. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Gary S. Nelson, P.E. Planning Engineer Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3600 87 1121 A G R E E M E N T hh tt, dated this _ /7 day of �6 U{ " , 1987, by and between Wnchingro t , a a for itself, its heirs, rnrpnrar;nn , executors, administrators , successors or assigns, hereinafter called the "DEVELOPER," and SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal corporation in the State of Washington, for the purpose of improving the intersection of Sprague Avenue and Gillis Road by installation of traffic signal system and appurtenant channelization and roadway improvements, which improvements are for the purpose of enhancing access to Developer's property under the following mutually agreed conditions, to wit: Spokane County agrees to perform the following: I. To prepare plans, specifications and estimate of cost for the project and Call for Bids from private contractors to accomplish said work. 2. To enter into a contract with the contractor submitting the lowest and best bid, subject to the approval of the Developer, and the deposit by the Developer of the contract amount, including signal equipment, plus 20% for construction engi— neering, inspection and contingencies with Spokane County. 3. To pay the contractor amounts due as the work is accomplished. 4. To deduct from the Developer's deposit the total costs and expenses of the pro— ject upon the completion thereof, including engineering, administration and associated costs. 5. To refund any balance of the Developer's deposit in excess of the total cost and expense of the improvement, or 6. To bill the Developer for the costs and and expenses of the project which exceed the deposit amount, if any. 7. Upon completion of the work to accept the same as part of the County road system and assume maintenance responsibility therefor. The Developer agrees as follows: I. To deposit the amount of Eight Thousand and No /100 Dollars ($8,000.00) with Spokane County at the time of execution of this Agreement to initiate prelimin— ary engineering for the project. 2. After bid opening by the County, but prior to award of the contract, to promptly deposit the contract amount, including signal equipment, plus twenty percent (20%) for construction engineering, inspection, contingencies, and associated costs with Spokane County. 3. To pay promptly to the County, as billed, for any and all costs, of the project which exceed the deposit amounts. THE PARTIES are here agreed that this is the whole and complete statement of their agreement. APPROVED: DEVELOPER: UNIVERSITY CITY. INC.. a APPROVED AS TO FO RW - '7//0 Washington co poration Title: nit Bus.Address: 21 .l JU,.,,J -( ,ti. SPOKANE COUNTY By: C rman of the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 87 1121 IN THE MATTER OF PARTICIPATION ) AGREEMENT FOR SPRAGUE AVENUE AND GILLIS) ROAD TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION ) COUNTY ROAD PROJECT NO. 2279 WHEREAS, The University City, Inc. a Washington Corporation, is desirous of improving the intersection of Sprague Avenue and Gillis Road by installation of a traffic signal system and appurtenant channelization and roadway improvements, which improvements are for the purpose of enhancing access to property at Sprague Avenue and Gillis Road; and WHEREAS, The University City, Inc. has agreed to pay the total costs and expenses of the project; and WHEREAS, An agreement has been prepared for execution by the Developers and Spokane County for the mutually agreed conditions and the County Engineer recommends execution by Spokane County. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of Coun Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, that the Agreement between Spokane County and University City, Inc. for the improvement of Sprague Avenue and Gillis Road is hereby approved and the Chairman of the Board hereby authorized to execute same by and on behalf of Spokane County. PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, this 17th day of November, 1987. ATTEST: „ ILLIAM E. DONAHUE ERK OF THE BOARD D E P U T Y R E S O L U T I O N BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON The Developer agrees as follows: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Deputy Prosecuting Attorney AGREEMENT This agreement, dated this day of , by and between , a Washington Corporation, for itself, its heirs, executors, administrators, successors of assigns, hereinafter called the "DEVELOPER," and SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal corporation in the State of Washington, for the purpose of improving the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Sullivan Road by installation of traffic signal system and appurtenant channelization and roadway improvements, which improvements are for the purpose of enhancing access to Developer's property under the following mutually agreed conditions, to wit: Spokane County agrees to perform the following: 1. To prepare plans, specifications and estimate of cost for the project and Call for Bids from private contractors to accomplish said work. 2. To enter into a contract with the contractor submitting their lowest and best bid, subject to the approval of the Developer, and the deposit by the Developer of the contract amount, including signal equipment, plus 20% for construction engineering, inspection and contingencies with Spokane County. 3. To pay the contractor amounts due as the work is accomplished. 4. To deduct from the Developer's deposit the ,total costs and expenses of the project upon the completion thereof, including engineering, administration and associated costs. 5. To refund any balance of the Developer's deposit in excess of the total cost and expense of the improvement, or 6. To bill the Developer for the costs and expenses of the project which exceed the deposit amount, if any. 7. Upon completion of the work to accept the same as part of the County road system and assume maintenance responsibility therefor. 1. To deposit the amount of Eight Thousand and No /100 Dollars ($8,000.00) with Spokane County at the time of execution of this Agreement to initiate preliminary engineering for the project. 2. After bid opening by the County, but prior to award of the contract, to promptly deposit the contract amount, including signal equipment, plus twenty percent (20 %) for construction engineering, inspection, contingencies, and associated costs with Spokane County. 3. To pay promptly to the County, as billed, for any and all costs of the project which exceed the deposit amounts. THE PARTIES are here agreed that this is the whole and complete statement of their agreement. APPROVED: DEVELOPER: By: Spokane County Engineer Title: Bus.Address: SPOKANE COUNTY By: Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE `FINDINGS & ORDER DATE: November 19, 1985 RE: PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER ZE- 180 -78, Restricted Industrial to B -2, B -3, I -1 & GA (Requested zoning will be in effect on effective date of revised Spokane County Zoning Code). 1. That the proposal is a mixed -use development on a 226 acres site. Included are a 79 acre regional shopping center, 19 acres of other commercial use, 22 acres of business park, 53 acres of industrial park, a 300 room hotel and a remaining 43 acres of roadways and open space. The development will he accomplished through the subdivision of the property as shown on the applicant's site development plan of 42 lots, rezoning of the property consistent with the adopted 1986 Spokane County Zoning Code. The review of this project is further consistent with the site development plan review requirements established with the Restricted Industrial zoning of the property in 1981. The project sponsor has indicated that the full development of the site will take approximately 15 years to accomplish. 2. That the proposal is located north of Interstate 90 on either side of the Sullivan Road interchange. The site southeast of the Spokane River occupies portions of Sections 10, 11, 12, 13 & 14, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. 3. That the item has been properly advertised in accordance with state and local regulations. The Committee first took testimony for a scheduled hearing on October 24, 1985 at which time it was brought to the Committee's attention that approximately three property owners had not received personal mail notification of the proposal. The Committee continued the public hearing to November 15, 1985 to allow the sponsor to renotify all property owners within 400 ft. of the proposal and afforded all interested parties an opportunity to testify and express their concerns or objections to the proposal. A correction to the legal notice for the November 15, 1985 hearing was made to reflect that a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement had been prepared rather than the earlier notice which indicated a DNS had been issued for this project. 4. That the Hearing Examiner Committee spent two days considering public testimony on Sullivan Park Center. Public testimony regarding the project focused most attention upon the project's potential impact to existing wildlife in the Spokane River Ecosystem adjoining the property to the north and the adverse impacts of the high traffic volumes which will be generated from the project when it is fully developed. These impacts include noise, high exhaust, and inconvenience for area residents. Additional concerns considered by the Committee were that the proposed development was an unnecessary commercial development and could pose an adverse impact upon existing businesses on Sprague and elsewhere in the County. Findings 8 Order for PE- 1504 -85 (Cont'd) The Committee did receive testimony favorable to the project which indicated that this development would establish more jobs and create an enhanced economy for the Valley. That the Committee heard from the Board of Directors for The Walk In The Wild Zoo that they were generally in favor of the project in that it would enhance their exposure to the general public. 5. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Industrial and the proposal is consistent with the land uses identified in this category. 6. That the Committee finds the proposal is significantly buffered from most residential uses in the Valley in that to the south of the property lies the Interstate freeway and a natural ridgeline elevated above the freeway on the freeway's southern border. To the north of the site lies the Spokane River, the Kaiser Trentwood Works and further to the east the Spokane Industrial Park. Two areas which have some large lot residential development abutting the property were considered by the Committee. One area lies generally on the east side of the project, adjacent and easterly of Flora, the other area lies to the southwest of the project generally parallel to Indiana Avenue as it currently located. The Committee finds that these residential areas are deserving of protection through site - buffering and restrictions to the development which the sponsor has agreed to in his presentations. 7. That the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act, Chapter 43.21C RCW, WAC 197 -11 and the Spokane Environmental Ordinance, Title 11 of the Spokane County Code have been met and more particularly: a) By document issued January 8, 1985 by Wallis D. Hubbard, Planning Director, the Sullivan Park Center PEIS, Volumes 1 and 1 (9/80) and FEIS (2/81) are recognized as adopted by, reference pursuant to WAC 197 -11- 600(4) and Sokane Environmental Ordinance 11.20.230. b) By document signed January 8, 1985 by Wallis D. Hubbard, Planning Director, a Determination of Significance and Request for Comments and on scope of a Supplemental EIS was issued for modification to the original site plan, a preliminary plat and zone reclassifications. c) The above documents were circulated consistent with WAC 197 -11 -408 and public notice given consistent with WAC 197 -11 -510 and Spokane Environmental Ordinance 11.10.130. d) The Draft Supplemental EIS was scoped, drafted, issued, circulated, reviewed, revised and a Final Supplemental EIS issued ursuant to WAC 197 -11 and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance. e) The total original EIS, the Supplemental EIS and public comment given at the public hearing were noted and evaluated during the decision making process, including particularly extensive information regarding habitat impacts and effects upon flora and fauna, both directly and indirectly. Findings & Order for PE- 1504 -85 (Cont'd) 8. That unavoidable adverse impacts to secondary habitat and certain fauna are acknowledged as most likely a consequence of the originally improved R -I zoning and generalized site plan. Of particular note the Committee notes comment R18 on Page 172 of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for Sullivan Park Center prepared in 1981 which indicates that "it is unlikely that this edge would be maintained by following the 1 /8th mile criteria. One reason is that the site lies adjacent to a major freeway interchange within the Spokane Metropolitan Area and is readily accessible to a large number of people....A second and more important reason is that the site is under private ownership. Unless some government agency or citizens' group purchases the site, the present owner currently has the right to develop within the confines of the existing zoning, regardless of the Ecosystem boundaries." 9. That the revised plan has no greater adverse impacts than the existing approved project and most likely less in so far as: a) The riparian buffer area is larger than before and will become a part of the County's Spokane River riparian park system. b) The present proposal will be hooked to areawide sewering, thus eliminating the threat to the Aquifer from on -site sanitary waaste disposal. c) The present proposal will have less carbon monoxide pollution than projected by the original EIS. d) Slightly less traffic will be generated by the present proposal when compated to the existing approved proposal and the projected traffic laod will be handled more efficiently and effectively. e) The stormwaer runoff treatment by grass percolation areas has been proven to be acceptable treatment for protection of the Aquifer. 10. NOTE: Pursuant to WAC 197 -11- 680(5), Notice is hereby given that in conjunction with final approval of the above reference matter that: a). The time limit for commencing SEPA appeal: of the approval of the above referenced matter, as provided by county ordinance, is 30 calendar days from final execution of the above Findings and Order. b). The time frame for appealing any SEPA issues with respect to the approval of the above referenced matter is 30 days after the execution of the above Findings and Order. c). The appeal of either the approval of the above referenced matter or any SEPA issues may be filed in the Spokane County Superior Court or a court of competent jurisdiction as provided by law. d). That decisions of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee become "Final" unless appealed within 10 days of the Committee written decision. e). Decisions rendered by the Board of County Commissioners are final when the Board signs its Findings and Order. Findings & Order for PE- 1504 -85 (Cont'd) 11. That the Committee notes that a project proposing similar uses as are currently under consideration was approved in March of 1981. That action rezoned the property to Restricted Industrial under the Zoning Ordinance for Spokane County which is still in effect. Although the previous action provided for a zone reclassification, the Committee finds the current proposal with its extensive landscaping provisions, road network improvements and provisions for public sewering to represent a substantial improvement over the project as previously considered. 12. The Committee notes the Spokane River Ecosystem is an important natural feature which includes open fields, grasslands and some ponderosa pine and is a wildlife habitat for various wildlife including bird species and small mammals. The Committee believes the riparian park proposal will bring about a continued habitat for some of these animals and will in all likelihood prevent some of the existing manmade degradation to the riveroank as was testified to by the Spokane County Parks Director. This degradation included substantial motorcycle and camping use along the riverbank as well as large amounts of trash left by persons using this area of the river. The project has been designed consistent with the state and local provisions of the Shorelines Management Act contained in RCW 90.58 and the local Shorelines Management Plan for Spokane County. 13. That the Committee finds the necessary utility and public improvements necessary to support this project have been provided for in County staff recommendations and have been agreed to by the sponsor. These improvements will cause the project to serve the general public health, safety and welfare. 14. The Committee understands that certain environmental changes will occur, but this was understood when the initial concept was approved in 1981. The Committee believes the benefits from this project will outweight any adverse impacts. 15. The Committee received a petition from area residents indicating only that they were opposed to Sullivan Park Center. The petition did not indicate why or how those who signed it felt the project would have an adverse impact to them. 16. Testimony was proposed to the Committee regarding the project sponsor's activities in other jurisdiction which the Committee declined to hear. The Committee felt such testimony was not relevant to the project currently being heard and the Committee had the necessary powers to insure that the project was properly conditioned and carried out in the public interest. Findings & Order for PE- 1504 -85 (Cont'd) CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the above findings concludes that the application of preliminary plat PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER and Zone Change ZE- 180 -78 from Restricted Industrial to B -2, B -3, I -1 & GA be APPROVED as conditioned in accordance with the Conditions of Approval attached hereto. VOTE: Unanimously approved THE HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTESTS TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION AND VOTE. a vpe airper. (Lt-} r /9 / /aJ DATE Spokane County Subdivision Administrator IN REFERENCE TO THE ATTACHED FINDINGS & ORDER, THEOHEARINGUEXAMINERACOMMITTEE ADOP1S THE FOLLOWING PLANNING REPORT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ATTACHED HERETO: 1. That the below listed conditions of all Departments and Agencies are binding upon the applicant, owner(s) of the property, heirs, successors or assigns. COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2. The preliminary plat of record approval is for the property legally described in the application for this proposal. 3. That the final plat(s) or phases be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record as legally described and advertised. However, the Subdivision Administrator may grant administrative approvals for divisions of land as provided by State law or local ordinance provided such divisions are consistent with the concept plan. 4. The Spokane County Subdivision Administrator shall review any proposed Final Plat to insure compliance with the Findings and Conditions of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. All final plats shall illustrate the 200 ft. setback from the ordinary high water mark pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act. 5. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for three (3) years to November 1, 1988. The applicant may request an Extension of Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 6. Upon filing the Final Plat the zone change of the Final Plat area shall be finalized and the existing Agricultural and Restricted Industrial zone classifications shall be in accordance with the zoning concept plan. 7. Prior to finalization of any part of the project, the existing Burlington Northern railroad lines through the western portion of the property will be either acquired and abandoned or relocated to the north of Indiana Avenue along the riparian park on the preliminary plat. 8. The applicant shall submit evidence that any structures located within the development are compatible with easement rights of any grantees of record, i.e., transmission lines prior to building permit release. 9. Prior to the finalization of Phase I, the general area shown as the riparian park shall be owned and maintained as a passive park by the Property Owners Association to be formed by the purchasers of lots within the project. Specific conditions, covenants and restrictions relating to maintenance and use of the park shall be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Zoning Administrator and filed with the Spokane County Auditor. Nothing within this condition shall prohibit the sponsor or subsequent owners from reaching agreements for the use or transfer of the riparian park to Spokane County. It is the intention of this condition to provide for regular maintenance of the passive park and retain it for public use. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) Planning Department (Cont'd) 10. That the planting and maintenance of the limited access areas shown as Open Space at the Sullivan Road /I -90 interchange and south of Indiana shall be provided by applicant or successors consistent with road landscaping requirements of Spokane County and the State of Washington. 11. The open space plantings and maintenance at the proposed Evergreen interchange shall be provided by the applicant or successor at the time the interchange is established. 12. The boulevard treatment landscaping for Indiana will be established or provided for as part of Phase I finalization by the applicant or successors. 13. That a Final Plat name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 14. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat, for distribution to the County Planning Department, Utilities Department, Engineering Department, Health District and applicable utility companies. Written approval of said utility easements by said utility companies must be received with the submittal of the final plat. 15. That a current certificate of title be furnished the County Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 16. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements unless the applicant(s) /sponsor(s) choose to file a notarized Waiver of Notice of Action with the Spokane County Planning Department. 17. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for lots to be developed prior to release of building permits. 18. That a plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection be approved by the water supplier, fire protection district, Spokane County Building & Safety Department and County health authorities. The agencies will certify on the WATER PLAN, prior to the filing of the final plat or any phase of the preliminary plat that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The WATER PLAN and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) Planning Department (Cont'd) The purveyor will also certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved WATER PLAN. The time schedule will provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat sponsor shall also sign the WATER PLAN to confirm the contractual arrangements or agreements. The final plat dedication will contain the following statement: "the public water system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building & Safety Department, and water purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 19. That no occupancy permit will be issued for any lot within the Final Plat until certified by a Washington State licensed engineer "that the water system has been installed pursuant the approved WATER PLAN for the Final Plat ", signed and stamped by said engineer. The certification may be in the form of a letter but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the WATER PLAN as a schematic map showing the "As Built" water system. 20. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 21. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the 1986 Spokane County Zoning Code. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 22. All mitigating measures set forth in the Final EIS be complied with and has been agreed to by the applicant. 23. That the project is subject to the Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone of the Spokane County Ordinance, which sets forth various measures for Aquifer protection; specifically, measures dealing with wastewater disposal, spill protection measures and stormwater runoff. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 24. The applicant shall provide sight- obscuring cyclone fencing 6 ft. in height along the southerly borders of Lots 1 through 9 of the preliminary plat and along the westerly edge of Lots 10 and 11 which adjoin properties not within the development. Additionally, the applicant shall provide a 6 ft. sight- obscuring fence along Lot 27 in the area which has been indicated by the applicant in a site plan amendment to be dedicated as non - developable. This area is approximately 500 ft. wide extending westerly of Flora Road. COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT 1. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to dedication of Right -of -Way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. That plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. i 4. That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. 5. That appropriate provisions be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1 -ft. strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the final plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) 6. A statement must appear in the dedicatory language of the final plat: "that individual driveway access permits be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system." 7. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to Sullivan Road. 8. That all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 9. That the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal acceptable to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway- County Road intersection. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the responsibility of the sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. This shall include both Phase I and Phase II designs. 10. That the applicant shall coordinate with the Spokane County Parks and Recreation Department and the County Engineer's Department to provide a bicycle pathway through the northern portion of the project paralleling the Spokane River. This pathway would be provided in lieu of bicycle lanes along the proposed arterial streets. 11. That access to Evergreen Road from parcels 12, 15, 16 and 17 is prohibited. 12. That the applicant shall submit to the County Engineer an intersection plan for the Evergreen -local access road located south of Indiana. 13. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which established regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 14. That prior to finalization of the proposed plat, the applicant shall submit to the County Engineer for review and approval "Typical" Roadway Cross Sections for the following proposed roadways: a. Indiana Avenue Sullivan to the proposed Evergreen intersection. b. Indiana Avenue from the proposed Evergreen intersection to the connection with the existing Indiana Avenue at the west end of the proposal. c. Evergreen Road south of Indiana Avenue, between Indiana and the proposed Evergreen interchange. d. Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus. 15. The typical roadway cross section for the roadway which connects the proposed Evergreen Road with the proposed Indiana Avenue in the westerly portion of the plat shall be typical roadway section No. 1 access standard. 16. That the typical roadway cross section for the cul -de -sac which is proposed east of Sullivan Road and extends southeasterly from Indiana Avenue shall be typical roadway section No. 1 access standard. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 17. That prior to recording of the final plat, the Burlington Northern Railroad line which runs through portions of the proposal on both the east and west sides of Sullivan Road, shall be abandoned or relocated. Prior to release of a building permit for those portions of the proposal identified as Phase I, the applicant shall: 18. Obtain permits for roadway construction from the appropriate state and county agencies (Spokane County Engineer). 19. Improve the Sullivan Road Intersection in a manner consistent with the approved plans and as set forth in the supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. 20. Construct those roadways which are identified in the supplemental Environmental Impact Statement as being necessary in order to accommodate traffic volumes which will be generated by Phase I. Construction shall be in conformance with the approved roadway plans and typical roadway cross - sections. Roadway construction must be completed prior to the release of building permits or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction improvements, construction certification, "as- built" plans, and monumenting the street centerline shall be filed with the County Engineer. 21. Construct a connection to the existing Indiana Avenue which is located to the south and west of the westerly boundary of the proposed plat. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to obtain the necessary right -of -way alignment for this connection. This connection must provide for a smooth transition between the existing Indiana Avenue and that which is proposed within the plat. The transition alignment shall be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer. The County Engineer will provide assistance during right -of -way negotiations should it be necessary. 22. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as- built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 23. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the proposed building site prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 24. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan for proposed building sites shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing, as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. 25. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 26. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 27. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 28. Should the Phase I development include those portions of the property lying east of Sullivan Road, the applicant will be required to construct the Sullivan Road improvement and interchange modifications which are scheduled for construction in order to accommodate Phase II of the proposal. a 29. That Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road shall be constructed per the approved plans and typical roadway cross - section if properties east of Sullivan Road are included in Phase I. 30. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to function as a private road providing that the roadway is constructed in accordance with Spokane County public road standards and in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross - section. 31. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County road right -of -way from the County Engineer. No work will be performed within the County road right -of -way without a permit. 32. If Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This document provides the following: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County, Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Section 3.07, Sections A & B of that title. 33. The traffic generated by the proposed project will have a significant impact upon Sullivan Road between Interstate 90 and Sprague Avenue. It is anticipated that a two -way left turn lane will be needed to accommodate turning movements along the Sprague to I -90 corridor. This left turn lane will be required prior to the construction of Phase II. Prior to the commencement of Phase III, it will be necessary to improve Sullivan Road to a seven lane facility. The proposed Design Report for the Evergreen Interchange shall also include a review of traffic conditions along the Sullivan Road /I -90 corridor. The above specified roadway improvements shall be considered within that analysis. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to pay for the costs of right -of -way acquisition and roadway improvements along Sullivan between I -90 and Sprague for Phase II. Should other Land development occur along the Sprague /I -90 Corridor which has measurable traffic impacts (i.e. large commercial or industrial uses) then a formula for participation in the sharing of costs for roadway improvements will be developed by the County Engineer. The formula will consider the traffic volumes generated by Sullivan Park Center as well as other identified traffic generators. For the Phase III improvements, a formula for the assessment of costs will be developed by the County Engineer in cooperation with the applicant. Of principal consideration in the development of the formula will be the traffic volumes generated by this project, traffic generated by other projects and other traffic utilizing the roadway. 34. That prior to the initiation of Phase II of the proposed development, the applicant will conduct an updated traffic study. This study may be included within the design report which will be prepared for the Evergreen Road Interchange. The Design Report shall also consider the impacts upon the County Road System of the extension of a connection to Mission Avenue from the proposed Evergreen Interchange. This analysis shall include potential traffic impacts upon Evergreen Road between Sprague Avenue and the connection. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department ( Cont'd) PHASE II Roadway construction and improvements for Phase II of the proposal shall be consistent with the improvements which have been identified within the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. Those improvements are as follows: 35. Construction and upgrading of the Sullivan Road - Indiana intersection in a manner consistent with the plans which have been improved by the Spokane County Engineer and the State of Washington Department of Transportation. 36. Construction of new freeway interchange at or near the alignment of Evergreen Road as identified within the Supplemental EIS. 37. Construction of Evergreen Road from Indiana Avenue southward to the proposed freeway interchange. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. 38. Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed Evergreen Road) shall be improved to a five -lane facility from Evergreen Road westerly to the connection with the existing Indiana Avenue. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. That Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed plat) must be widened to provide additional traffic lanes in order to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. A five lane facility is required to mitigate the traffic impacts upon Indiana Avenue and adjoining business properties A plan for the upgrade of the intersection at Pines and Indiana must be submitted to the County Engineer as specified in condition #9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to secure the additional right -of -way for the improvement of Indiana Avenue. 39. Indiana Avenue (east of Sullivan Road) shall be constructed as a five -lane facility from Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus of the project. Indiana shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. 40. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to function as a private road, providing that the roadway is constructed in accordnace with Spokane County Public Road Standards in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross - section. 41. That the applicant must obtain permits right -of -way from the County Engineer. the County road right -of -way without a to perform work in the County road No work will be performed within permit. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 42. If Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This document provides the following: That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road Improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Section 3.07, Sections A and B of that title. 43. Should the Evergreen Interchange Design Report determine that the level of improvements as specified within the Suplemental EIS are not necessary for Phase II, then the County Engineer may approve a phased plan for roadway construction or design deviations for Phase II roadway improvements. 44. That a public road Right -of -Way connection shall be provided to properties which are located to the south and east of Parcels #27 and #28 as depicted on the preliminary plat. This will require a redesign of the plat in this area. PHASE III 45. The roadway improvements for Phase III identified within the Supplemental EIS are the connection from the new freeway interchange at Evergreen Road southward to Mission Avenue and the possible connections northward and eastward of the proposal. The need for these improvements will be addressed in the development of the Evergreen Interchange Design Report. The level of improvements, assignment of financial responsibility for improvements and timing of construction will be determined on the basis of traffic volumes, location of facilities and traffic safety related issues. 46. Phase III improvements as identified_by_the_Design Report shall be constructed prior to the commencement of_Rhase_I.I.I Construction. ction. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Health District (COnt'd) 2. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage system shall not be authorized." 3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social & Health Services. 4. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 5. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.44 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Connection to the Valley sewer system is to be made prior to release of occupancy permits for any structures within the site. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1. That the applicant obtain necessary approval from the Department of Transportation for each phase of the project prior to finalization. 2. That the applicant submit proof to the Planning Department file that Washington State Department of Transportation conditions have been satisfactorily handled prior to finalization of any portion of the preliminary plat. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) WASHINGTON STATE OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION 1. In the event that archaeological or historic resources are discovered during project activities, the applicant or successor shall notify the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation in Olympia, Washington. o .c /9 %% 8S Date ai rpe son C�u, this" ti2 June 20, 1988 File No. 3 -2705- 0301 -05 Mr. M. W. Tranum District Administrator Washington State Department of Transportation North 2714 Mayfair Street P.O. Box 5299 North Central Station Spokane, Washington 99205 -0299 Dear Mr. Tranum: Offices in California, Oregon and Washington. W!LSEY0.11E M ENGINEERING AND PLANNING SERVICES Public Improvements • Land Ikw•lopment • Transportation 1980 112th Avenue N.E. CO. Box C -97304 Bellevue, Washington 98009 -7730 (206)454-3250 RECEIVED JUN 2 1 1988 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER RE: I -90 Corridor Study EIS In behalf of our client, R.A. Hanson Company, we appreciate the opportunity to review the DEIS for improvements to 1 -90 in Spokane. With the continued growth of the Spokane area, it is imperative that roadway infrastructure needs be considered in a long -range planning context as represented by this DEIS. We commend WSDOT for their foresight and leadership in anticipating future needs and addressing the difficult issues related to freeway rehabilitation in urban areas. Implementation of these improvements will assure mobility for our citizens and produce economic benefits throughout the Inland Empire region. Our involvement with the 1 -90 project concerns access to the proposed Sullivan Park Center in the vicinity of the existing Sullivan and Pines Road interchanges. A master plan for the Sullivan Park Center was developed during 1984 -1986, and was accompanied by extensive environmental impact reviews. A program of phased roadway improvements, coordinated with phases of project development, was prepared with the participation of WSDOT and Spokane County. The early phases of the Sullivan Park Center are designed to be served from the Sullivan Road interchange, combined with an extension of Indiana Avenue. In the final phase, an access would be provided which we envision as a new interchange on 1 -90 between Sullivan and Pines roads, designated as the Evergreen Interchange in the DEIS. The primary reason for the Evergreen Interchange is its role in relieving future congestion at the Sullivan Road interchange. The Evergreen interchange would reduce traffic volulnes on the Sullivan rarnps and at the proposed Sullivan /Indiana intersection. In this regard, it appears the DEIS has not addressed traffic volumes on the major arterials which interchange with 1 -90. This information would provide a sense of the need and justification for additional interchanges or interchange modifications where they are proposed. We have prepared updated traffic projections for use in a design study of the Evergreen interchange that is currently underway. These figures show future traffic volumes on the arterial system with and without the Evergreen interchange at full buildout of the Sullivan Park Center. We feel this information is critical to evaluating the Evergreen interchange proposal. Mr. M. W. Tranum June 20, 1988 Page Two Several other points of clarification about the Evergreen interchange proposal also are relevant to the EIS: 1. Various design alternatives are under consideration. The stated impacts in the DEIS represent worst -case conditions with a full diamond interchange. 2. The interchange may include a connection with the existing Evergreen Road south of Mission Avenue. If this connection is included, traffic volumes may increase in the residential areas along Evergreen Road to the south. 3. The interchanges may be constructed in phases to provide early mitigation of the traffic impacts of the Sullivan Park Center, with other improvements to be made as growth in the area dictates additional improvement needs. 4. Concepts which have been evaluated include numerous configurations and locations of the proposed interchange. Most have been rejected for reasons of safety, lack of flexibility for future improvements, or impact on adjacent properties. We have included conceptual drawings of the two alternatives which appear at this time to be most reasonable. We are proposing that the first phase of either of these alternatives would be constructed when required by the developer of Sullivan Park Center, and future phases, when required by growth of the general area, by the appropriate public agencies. All improvements in the first phase would be made in such a manner as to be easily expanded for future growth. Alternative A would probably require relocation of the existing water tower with extension of the road up the hill to connect to Evergreen Road. The road extension will probably not require any disturbance of the existing wells. Alternative B would not require disturbing of the wells or water tower, but would require sharp corners at the south connection to Evergreen Road or acquisition of some additional existing homes. Our preliminary review indicates that Alternative A is probably the preferable alternative. If we can provide additional information please call us immediately. Sincerely, WILSEY & HAM / -I Gene W. Wright, P.E. Project 'Manager EWW /1jr Enclosures cc: R.A. Hanson Company Ross Kelley Dick Simpson Carl Olson Duaine Rasmussen Randy Hammond WITHOUT EVERGREEN INTERCHANGE Evergreen 9700 WITH EVERGREEN INTERCHANGE PHASE I EVERGREEN INTERCHANGE PHASE II 1 -90 EVERGREEN INTERCHANGE & SOUTH CONNECTION Indiana . 34200 53'_d 44100 Mission Evergreen Everg een 28700 9100 1 -90 1 -90 Indiana. c 44100 m Mission 67500 e - 35000 • Mission SULLIVAN & EVERGREEN INTERCHANGES YEAR 2000 ADT TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS May, 1988 34200 57800 34200 38800 Indians Ave. (Proposed) V 1, V E 411 11 Mission Ave. - n _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 n EVERGREEN RD. INTERCHANGE ALTERNATE A ULTIMATE ALIGNMENT W SULLIVAN PARK CENTER 11 11 11 1 1 SR 90 Indiana Ave. Pro•osed 1 1 I ¢I ' I Watertank E', 0 'We11sl ' Mission Ave. _ 1 EVERGREEN RD. INTERCHANGE ALTERNATE B ULTIMATE ALIGNMENT Vii W SULLIVAN PARK CENTER 1 11 r= I' II 11 ,1 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER IN REFERENCE TO THE "TACHED FINDINGS 8 ORDER, THE Hr 'ING EXAMINER COMMITTEE ADCO TS 'NE FOLLOWING BANNING REPORT CONDITIONS OF AN1 1GVAL ATTACHED HERETO: 1. That the below listed conditions of all Departments and Agencies are binding upon the applicant, owner(s) of the property, heirs, successors r- T or assigns. COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2. The preliminary plat of record approval is for the property legally � PAS described in the application for this proposal. � 3. That the final plat(s) or phases be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record as legally described and advertised. 'owever, the Subdivision Administrator may grant administrative approvals for divisions of land as provided by State law or local ordinance provided such divisions are consistent with the concept plan 4. The Spokane County Subdivision Administrator shall review any proposed Final Plat to insure compliance with the Findings and Conditions of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. ckll final plats shall illustrate the 200 ft. setback from the ordinary high water mark pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act 5. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval ,for three_.(3) years -to November 1, 1988. The applicant may request an Extension of Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 6. Upon filing the Final Plat the zone change of the Final Plat area shall be finalized and the existing Agricultural and Restricted Industrial zone classifications shall be in accordance_with the zoning concept plan. 7. Prior to finalization of any part of the project, the existing Burlington Northern railroad .lines through the western portion of the property will be either and abandoned_or_:relocated,to the north of Indiana Avenue along the riparian park on the preliminary plat. 8. The applicant shall submit evidence that any ,structures within the development are compatibleJ rights ,of any grantees of record, i.e., transmission lines prior to building permit release. 1 9 Prior to the finalization of Phase I, the general area shown as the :riparian park ...shall be owned and maintained . as a passive park by the _ ?roperty..Owners.Association,to be formed by the purchasers of lots within > the project. Specific conditions, covenants and restrictions relating to gut ` maintenance and use of the park shall be reviewed and approved by the ,', ' Spokane County Zoning Administrator and filed with the Spokane County >; P �' S 1 Auditor. Nothing within this condition shall prohibit the sponsor or ■ ° ' subsequent owners from reaching agreements for the use or transfer of the r '` A riparian park to Spokane County. It is the intention of this condition to provide for regular maintenance of the passive park and retain it for public use. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) Planning Department (Cont'd) 110 That the planting and maintenance of the limited access areas shown as 'Open Spactat the Sullivan Road /I -90 interchange and south of Indiana shall provided by applicant or successors consistent with road landscaping requirements of Spokane County and the State of Washington. 11. The open space plantings and maintenance at the proposed Evergreen interchange.shall be provided by the applicant or successor at the time the interchange is established. <12>. The boulevard treatment landscaping for Indiana will be established o � provided for as part of Phase I finalization by the applicant or -. successors 13. That a Final Plat name indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. (14). That appropriate utility. easements•be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat, for distribution to the County_ Planning Department, -Utilities Department, Engineering Department, Health District and applicable utility companies. Ours: pn7 =ap{urtva sag'd„atix °CY„easemep'Csr, a3= A=tt ti+TY' mm� � ,.race 'Tiir ia br a Gof_ - y ea- - CPAIm ._ttd ligd Stt1E1 ai a . 4 t' 'Till} (4" ISE COM? wkI" FIN.t1 rC4f 15 inns"! D O.A $O (WI 1.114:`. C.I \1n " 47-S C.,.+ AF Pal o. FIYNI •CFT. 15. That a current Certificate of title be furnished the County 9lanning Department,prior to filing the final plat. 16. That the provisions of SEPA'S.NOTICE.OF.`ACTION, pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the project applicant within thirty__(30) days - of;, final - dispositi_on-_of, this application, and prior to any on -site improvements unless the applicant(s)/sponsor(s) choose to file a notarized Waiver of Notice of Action with the Spokane County Planning Department. 17. A specific landscape:'plan planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator_ be submitted with a performance bond fgr lots to be developed prior to release of building permits. 18. That a plan for_water= facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection be approved by the water,, supplier, fire'protection:.district,. Spokane,. County, Building ;8"Safety..Department_and Countyliddlth- authorities. The agencies will certify on the WATER PLAN, prior to the filing of the final plat or any phase of the preliminary plat that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The WATER PLAN and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. . HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) Planning Department ( Cont'd) The purveyor will also certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved WATER PLAN. The time schedule will provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat sponsor shall also sign the WATER PLAN to confirm the contractual arrangements or agreements. The final plat dedication will contain the following statement: "the public water system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved by County and State' Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building & Safety Department, and water purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a buildingpermit for each lot: 19. That no occupancy_permit:will be issued for any lot within the Final Plat until certified by a Washington _State..licensed„engineer "that the water system has been installed pursuant the approved WATER PLAN for the Final Plat ", signed and stamped by said engineer. The certification may be in the form of a letter but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the WATER PLAN as a schematic map showing the "As Built" water system. 20. Approval by the ZoningAdministrator_of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior 'to the release of any building permits. 21. The applicant shall,_;7developsubject property),generally .in:.actordance. withinwthe .concept - .the Hearing :Examiner. :Committee. Variations when approved by Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the 1986 Spokane County Zoning Code. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 22. All mj3igating--measures, set forth in thefinaUEIS be complied with and has been agreed to by the applicant. 23. That the project is subject to the Aquifert Sensitive'Area:OverlayiZonevof the _Spokane County_Ordinance which sets forth various measures for Aquifer protection; specifically, measures dealing with wastewater disposal, spill protection measures and stormwater runoff. P,._ Buie ., , , Ln /C J. rc °M• .^{ . CA, `c \ . HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 4 ! 24. The applicant shall provide sight- obscuring cyclone. fencing 6.ft. in height along the southerly borders of Lots 1 through 9 of the preliminary plat and along the westerly edge of Lots 10 and 11 which adjoin properties not within the development. Additionally, the applicant shall provide a 6 ft. sight- obscuring fence along Lot 27 in the area which has been indicated by the applicant in a site plan amendment to be dedicated as non - developable. This area is approximately 500 ft. wide extending westerly of Flora Road. COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT G l Right -of-Way approval of the plat oad given in the of �� preliminary plat'of record. `■ G' SoV 2. That plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the V \k.m w't'^h^ County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of cc each final plat; .road plans to be prepared under the direction of a Tr.b;o.,na. duet iQ.. licensed ., ?rofessional_Civil_Engineer. 3.. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil: Engineer. 4. That the regulations of the National:Flood Insurance"Program'be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. L ANcu4u 5. That appropriate provisions be made that the following described property be held jn'trust: until the continuation of the streets be _dedicated or deeded: A 1 -ft. strip at the ends or edges of "all streets that terminate or border the final plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) L,N6 „ m1e 6. A statement must appear in the dedicatory language of the final:plat: "that individual driveway access permits be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system.” « 000u 7. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no_ direct;accessCbe allowed from: ots, •„ 8. That all publicroads the plat be designed and.constructed to Spokane County.standards., at the applicant shall coordinate with the Spokane County Parks and N,a .,, p 11 swo wortNH 12 • 13. � �,e d1 Recreation Department and the County Engineer's Department to provide a e C � � e P the Spokane R iver. This �tpathway wouldobeiprovided the i project fab paralleling lane along the proposed arterial streets. (Tt t to r gc. �. Q c 2 . & 4:-. Y - - S That access,:,to Evergreen Road from:parcels 15, 16 and 17 is prohibited.`? That the applicant shall submit to the County.Engineer.,an intersection plan for the Evergreen _local _ access - :road,located south`of Indiana. The proposed plat be improved`to the standards:•set forth in:Spokane County.. Board_ of_ County.Commissions„R eresolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, - which established regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. Pt' HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER Th 14. That prior to finalization of the proposed plat, the applicant shall . submit to the County Engineer for review and approval ".Typical-.'._Roadway� Cress Sections - .for the following proposed roadways: a b. Indiana Avenue Sullivan to the proposed Evergreen intersection. Indiana Avenue from the proposed Evergreen intersection to the connection with the existing Indiana Avenue at the west end of the proposal. Evergreen Road south of Indiana Avenue, between Indiana and the proposed Evergreen interchange. d. Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus. 15. The typical roadway cross section for the roadway which connects the proposed;Evergreen:Road.with the proposed Indiah Avenue in the westerly portion of the plat shall be typicahroadwayzsection;No: ;_l;access standard. 16. That the typical roadway cross section for the cu6de4it-which is proposed east of Sullivan Road and extends southeasterly from Indiana Avenue shall be typical._:; roadway ;section -No 1 - access standard. 9� . ( ... HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) oa „� 17. That prior: *to recording 'of the final plat, the Burlington Northern �` . :..Railroad :l.ine which runs through portions of the proposal on both the east and west sides of Sullivan Road, shall...be abandoned or relocated. Prior to release of a building permit for those portions of the proposal identified as Phase I, the applicant shall:-. _._.....__......_. Obtain - permits for roadway construction from the appropriate state and county agencies (Spokane County Engineer). Improve the,Sullivan Road Intersection in a manner consistent with the approved plans and as set forth in the supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. 20. Construct those roadways which are identified in the supplemental Environmental. Impact Statement as being necessary in order to accommodate traffic volumes which will be generated by Phase I. Construction shall be in conformance with the approved roadway plans and typical roadway cross- sections. Roadway must be completed :.prior.to the release of building permits or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction improvements, construction certification, "as- built” plans, and monumenting the street centerline shall be filed with the County Engineer. . 21. Construct•a connectioCto_ the .ezisting':Indiana ;Avenue, °which is located to the south and west of the westerly boundary of the proposed plat. It shall be theapplicant's responsibility to obtain the necessary right -of -way alignment for this connection. This connection must provide for a smooth transition between the existing Indiana Avenue and that which is proposed within the plat. The transition alignment shall be reviewed and approved by the'County Engineer. The County Engineer will provide assistance during right -of -way negotiations should it be necessary. 22. Consteuction'within the•propoed •public'streets'and easements-shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyors who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as- built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 23. The applicant shall submtt._for approval by the:SpokahelCounty_Eng1neer' and the Spokane County Health Districtra detailed combined on=site;sewage- ystem` plan and surface Water-:'dispeSal'.:plah'for the proposed building site prior to the issuance of any:building:permit ' on the property. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 24. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan for proposed building sites shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of'a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing, as approved by the .County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. 25. The construction of the road improvements: stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 26. All required improvements shall conform to the current State - of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction; and other applicable County standards and /or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 27. _Roadway.standards,typical roadway sections and drainage'plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 28. Should the Phase I development include those portions of the property lying east of Sullivan Road, the applicant will be required to construct the Sullivan.Road.:improvement'and interchange modifications which are scheduled for construction in order to accommodate Phase II of the proposal. 29. That Indiana AVenue ';east °of :,Sullivan Road shall be constructed per the approved plans and typical roadway cross - section- i.ffproperties eastiof Sullivan Road ar_e included'in Phase I. 30. That the County Engineer may;; ;permit Indi_ana of Sullivan Road to function as a private. road providing that the roadway is constructed in accordance with Spokane County public road standards and in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross- section. . 31. That the applicant must obtain permits)to perform work in the County road ;right =,of= way frdethe County:Engineer? No work will be performed within the County road right -of -way without a permit. 32. If- InaTana,_Avenue= east_,of Sullivan Road is to function'as a pjv_ate;road ;w then the applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This document„provldes the following::; HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department ( Cont'd) That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. Private roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County, Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Section 3.07, Sections A & B of that title. 33 The traffic generated by the proposed project will have a significant.. impact upon Sullivan Road between Interstate 90 and Sprague Avenue. It is anticipated that a two- wayieft :turn be needed to accommodate turning movements along the Sprague to I -90 corridor. This left turn lane will be required.prior :to the construction of ?hase_II: Prior to the commencement of Phase =III; it will be necessary to improve Sullivan Road to a seven=lane.,facili_ty. The proposed Design Report for the Evergreen Interchange shall also include a review of traffic conditions along the Sullivan Road /I -90 corridor. The above specified roadway improvements shall be considered within that analysis. It shall be the applicant's - responsibility to pay for the costs'of right -of -way ac_quisitionand roadway improvements along Sullivan between .1 :90'and Sprague for Phase II. Should other land development occur along the Sprague /I -90 Corridor which has measurable traffic impacts (i.e. large commercial or industrial uses) then a formula for participation in the sharing of costs for roadway improvements will be developed by the County Engineer. The formula will consider the traffic volumes generated by Sullivan Park Center as well as other identified traffic generators. For the Phase 1II improvements, a formula for the assessment of costs will be developed by the County Engineer in cooperation with the applicant. Of principal consideration in the development of the formula will be the traffic volumes generated by this project, traffic generated by other projects and other traffic utilizing the roadway. 34. That priorto; - the initiation of Phase: I of the proposed development, the applicant will conduct an updated;°traffi:rstudy. This study may be included within the design report which will be prepared for the Evergreen Road Interchange. The Design Report shall also consider the impacts upon the County Road System of the extension of a connection to Mission Avenue from the proposed Evergreen Interchange. This analysis shall include potential traffic impacts upon Evergreen Road between Sprague Avenue and the connection. .. t, �. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 7a1' i PHAS Roadway construction and improvements for Phase II of the proposal shall be consistent with the improvements which have been identified within the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. Those improvements are as follows: 35. Construction and upgrading of the Sullivan Road - Indiana intersection in a manner consistent with the plans which have been improved by the Spokane County Engineer and the State of Washington Department of Transportation. 36. Construction of new freeway interchange at or near the alignment of Evergreen Road as identified within the Supplemental EIS. 37. Construction of Evergreen Road from Indiana Avenue southward to the proposed freeway interchange. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross- section. 38. Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed Evergreen Road) shall be improved to a five -lane facility from Evergreen Road westerly to the connection with the existing Indiana Avenue. This roadway shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. That Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed plat) must be widened to provide additional traffic lanes in order to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. A five lane facility is required to mitigate the traffic impacts upon Indiana Avenue and adjoining business properties. A plan for the upgrade of the intersection at Pines and Indiana must be submitted to the County Engineer as specified in condition #9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to secure the additional right -of -way for the improvement of Indiana Avenue. 39. Indiana Avenue (east of Sullivan Road) shall be constructed as a five -lane facility from Sullivan Road to the easterly terminus of the project. Indiana shall be constructed per the approved road plans and in conformance with the approved typical roadway cross - section. 40. That the County Engineer may permit Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road to function as a private road, providing that the roadway is constructed in accordnace with Spokane County Public Road Standards in conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway cross - section. 41. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County road right -of -way from the County. Engineer. No work will be performed within the County road right -of -way without a permit. 6 \ fit HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Engineer Department (Cont'd) 42. If Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road is to function as a private road, then the applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 4. This document provides the following: That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be petitioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the property in accordance with provisions RCW 36.81, the owners, their heirs or assigns must agree to join and participate in the formation of a County Road Improvement project sanctioned by Spokane County. ?rivate roads must be signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended, and constructed in conformance with Section 3.07, Sections A and 8 of that title. 43. Should the Evergreen Interchange Design Report determine that the level of improvements as specified within the Suplemental EIS are not necessary for Phase II, then the County Engineer may approve a phased plan for roadway construction or design deviations for Phase II roadway improvements. 44. That a public road Right -of -Way connection shall be provided to properties which are located to the south and east of Parcels #27 and #28 as depicted on the preliminary plat. This will require a redesign of the plat in this area. PHASE III 45. The roadway improvements for Phase III identified within the Supplemental EIS are the connection from the new freeway interchange at Evergreen Road southward to Mission Avenue and the possible connections northward and eastward of the proposal. The need for these improvements will be addressed in the development of the Evergreen Interchange Design Report. The level of improvements, assignment of financial responsibility for improvements and timing of construction will be determined on the basis of traffic volumes, location of facilities and traffic safety related issues. 46. Phase III improvements as identified by the Design Report shall be constructed prior to the commencement of Phase III construction. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health Oistrict. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS. OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) County Health District (COnt'd) 2. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage system shall not be authorized." 3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social & Health Services. 4. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 5. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. The dedication shall state: The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System. Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Connection to the Valley sewer system is to be made prior to release of occupancy permits for any structures within the site. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1. That the applicant obtain necessary approval from the Department of Transportation for each phase of the project prior to finalization. 2. That the applicant submit proof to the Planning Department file that Washington State Department of Transportation conditions have been satisfactorily handled prior to finalization of any portion of the preliminary plat. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 1504 -85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) WASHINGTON STATE OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION 1. In the event that archaeological or historic resources are discovered during project activities, the applicant or successor shall notify the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation in Olympia, Washington. /, Date Chairperson E (1 1 1 1 1 1 � SULLIVAN PARK CENTER w 1 _1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Draft Supplemental 0 Environmental Impact Statement ego To 1=t 00 our am) AT / 5 EXuS%NG ap Pe CAST S /PE yr o-iC s ROAD g r L.✓P'A-etxd nVC • 2 �J EGA P o✓ RATE Fez L1 0 — i �Z�iv i ,4, An A M b E R 6e j Z ro 0 s LAJD,q4,61 M4 Pc s A96 0 --zw -s M 4 V E C e; P‘._ DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT for SULLIVAN PARK CENTER (Supplement to Sullivan Park Center Draft EIS - September 1980) for review and comment by citizens, citizen groups and government agencies in compliance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 Chapter 43.21C RCW, as amended Revised SEPA Rules, effective April 4, 1984 Chapter 197 -11, Washington Administrative Code Spokane Environmental Ordinance Chapter 11.10, Spokane County Code Table of Contents Page FACT SHEET SUMMARY 1 ALTERNATIVES 8 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT, SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES LAND AND SHORELINE USE 11 TRANSPORTATION 13 UTILITIES 34 REFERENCES 36 DISTRIBUTION LIST 37 APPENDICES A - Transportation Analysis Background Materials 39 B - Traffic Volume Projections 54 C - Preliminary Plan, 1-90 Proposed Interchange 60 D - Architectural Guidelines 62 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location 2 Figure 2: Site Development Plan 5 Figure 3: Existing Daily Traffic Volumes 17 Figure 4: Projected Daily Traffic Volumes (without the project) 19 Figure 5: Proposed Road Improvements and Alternatives 23 Figure 6: Projected Daily Traffic Volumes (with the project) 25 Figure 7: Sullivan Road Intersection Plan (Phase I) 27 Figure 8: Sullivan Road Intersection Plan (Phases II and III) 28 LIST OF TABLES Table I: Proposed Project Development Areas and Phasing 4 Table II: Previous Phasing (1981) 6 Table III: Intersection Levels of Service 20 Table IV: Project Trip Generation 21 Table V: Phase I Intersection Levels of Service 26 Table VI: Phase II Intersection Levels of Service 29 Table VII: Phase III Intersection Levels of Service 30 Subsequent Environmental None anticipated Review Location of Background Materials Cost per Copy Note: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 $5.00 (plus postage, if applicable) Another regional mall (Valley Mall) has been proposed in the general vicinity of the I -90 /Sullivan Road Interchange, on a site lying approximately one - half mile southeast of the Sullivan Park Center. This proposal was granted a zone change in 1979 with the condition that the project commence substantial construction by October, 1985, or the site would revert to the previous agricultural zone. A public hearing would be required by October to request an extension of the commercial zoning or a change in this condition. Practical economics would dictate that two competing regional malls cannot feasibly exist in such close proximity considering the characteristics of the projected trade area. Therefore, this SEIS was developed under the assumption that only Sullivan Park Center would be realized on a regional scale, and that the valley Mall proposal would eventually consist of high density commercial or residential activity. Should the Valley Mali proposal become a reality, the Sullivan Park Center would, in all probability, not be constructed and another use would occur on the proposed site - -most likely some combination of light industrial, office and commercial. ii Fact Sheet Proposal Title - Description - Location - Implementation Date - Proposal Sponsor Lead Agency Responsible Official - Contact for Questions, Comments, Information - Approvals Required Author /Principal Contributor Date of Issue of Draft SEIS Date Comments Due Date of Final Action Sullivan Park Center (supplement to Sullivan Park Center Draft EIS - September 1980) A mixed -use development on a 226 -acre site is being planned in Spokane County. Included are a 79 -acre regional shopping center, 19 acres of other commercial use, 22 acres of business park, 53 acres of industrial park, a 300 -room hotel, and a remaining 43 acres of roadways and open space. The center will be north of Interstate 90 on either side of the Sullivan Road interchange. The site, southeast of the Spo- kane River, occupies portions of sections 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meri- dian. Spring 1986 Hanson Properties, Inc. North 8700 Crestline Spokane, Washington 99207 (509) 467-0770 Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 Wallis D. Hubbard, Planning Director Thomas G. Mosher North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456 -2205 County development plan and development standards appro- val, Spokane County Health District, DOE and DSHS sewer- age system approval; Spokane County Engineers' road and storm drainage approvals. Wilsey & Ham 1980 - 112th Avenue NE Bellevue, Washington 98004 (206) 454-3250 June 21, 1985 July 23, 1985 October 1985 SPOKANE COUNTY COURT MOUSE June 1985 Sincerely, Wallis D. Hubbard, Spokane County Planning Director n: i C I � PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 To Whom It May Concern: The environmental impact statement for Sullivan Park Center, Draft (September 1980) and Final (February 1981) is being updated by this supplemental EIS. The project is slightly different from that originally proposed. In addition to changes in the site plan, the key issues discussed in this document are site development standards, transportation, phasing and sewage disposal. The proposed project, a mixed -use development, is in Spokane County. It is located east of the City of Spokane, north of Interstate 90 at Sullivan Road. Parcels within the 225 -acre site are designated for specific uses including regional shopping center, commercial development, business park, industrial park and hotel /motel, with passive park /open space along the Spokane River. It is anticipated that each parcel will be acquired by individual developers and improved within the framework of the overall site development plan and required site development standards. Development standards will be applied to ensure coordinated, compatible phased development of the entire site. A project schedule consisting of three phases is proposed to maintain accep- table traffic conditions during construction. Coordinating the project with access improvements should provide capacity to meet growing traffic demands through full site development by the year 2000. Originally, on -site disposal of wastewater was proposed as an interim measure for the project. A public sewer system interceptor that has been recently built in the vicinity of the site can accommodate the sewage needs of the project, and initial connection to that system is now proposed. Therefore the issue of potential impacts to groundwater that had been raised has been eliminated. Your comments on this draft supplemental EIS are invited. Questions and comments received during the 30 -day review period will be answered in the final supplemental EIS. Summary Proposal and Objectives Hanson Properties, Inc. proposes a mixed -use development, Sullivan Park Center, on a 226 -acre site in Spokane County. The site is east of the City of Spokane ... and south of the Spokane River, on the north side of Interstate 90 at the Sullivan Road interchange as shown in Figure 1. The proposal includes a regional shopping center, commercial uses, a hotel /motel, a business park, an industrial park and passive park /open space along the river. A draft EIS and final EIS for Sullivan Park Center were completed in September 1980 and February 1981 respectively. Subsequent to issuance of the 1981 FEIS, the subject property was reclassified from Spokane County's Agricultural Zone to Restricted Industrial Zone, on March 6, 1981. The reclassification contained a provision requiring submission of a specific site development plan prior to construction approvals. The current development proposal is somewhat different from the original proposal in the sizes and locations of parcels designated for various uses, in total amount of development, in the handling of sanitary sewage and in circulation plans. Also, although responsible for development of the roads and utilities and platting of the land, the sponsor would not necessarily be directly involved in design or construction of the buildings. Therefore, specific site development plans are not available and are not part of the current proposal. In lieu of such specific plans, the sponsor is proposing that various defined parcels within the site be designated for certain types of uses, and that specific development standards, based on existing and proposed county zoning regula- tions, be attached to each parcel to assure that the type, quality and character of future development would meet existing and proposed county standards. The objective of the current request is to gain approval of the revised site development plan, conditioned by the proposed development standards, so that the property can be platted for development of the specific uses with the assurance of coordinated and compatible phased development of the entire site. Changes from Previous Proposal Regional Shopping Center The previous regional shopping center proposal included an 880,000- square -foot first phase by 1983 with ultimate development to 1,038,000 square feet. The current request 1 NM M MS • N MI MI _ IS MI l MI MN M 0 1 2 Liberty Lake 6 PARK CENTER Location Wilsey & Ham Figure 1 includes a 650,000- square -foot first phase regional center by 1990, a second phase to 925,000 square feet by 1995, and a possible ultimate development to 1,030,000 square - feet. Each phase and the total regional center now proposed are therefore somewhat smaller than the previous proposal. However, unlike the previous plan, the current development plan is designed to accommodate additional retail and commercial uses, of the types that usually locate near regional centers, on a number of parcels adjacent to or near the center. The current plan would hold about 113,000 square feet of additional commercial space at Phase II, and could ultimately accommodate about 318,000 square feet. The total retail /commercial space, at ultimate development, would then be about 1,348,000 square feet, approximately 30 percent more than the previous 1,038,000 - square -foot proposal. It should be noted that the previous proposal did not consider possible future development of approximately 30 acres of land initially committed to sewage disposal drainfields. This land could have supported over 400,000 square feet of additional commercial or other development, under an additional proposal, after the sewer connections were made. Business Park The previous proposal included 94,000 square feet of business park development in Phase I in 1983 and a total of 294,000 square feet at ultimate build -out. The current request includes approximately 294,000 square feet of business park by 1995 in Phase II, and a potential for an additional 96,000 square feet in the final phase, or a potential total about 33 percent larger than the previously proposed business park development. Industrial Park The previous proposal included 330,000 square feet of industrial uses, all built in the second or final phase. The current request includes a similar amount in Phase II by 1995. After 1995 the current development plan would accommodate an additional 470,000 square feet of industrial park, which would more than double the footage of industrial uses previously proposed. Reason for Supplemental EIS The current proposal requires modification of certain conditions of an existing, approved Restricted Industrial Zone classification, case ZE- 180 -78. The lead agency has determined that because of the proposed site development plan changes, the proposal would have probable significant adverse impacts on the environment. 3 Proposed Phasing Phase I By 1990 Phase 1I 1990 -1995 Phase III • 1995 -2000 1990 1990 Sq.Ft. Acres Per Year 5 -year Growth 1995 Sq.Ft. 1995 Acres Per Year 5 -year Growth 2000 Sq.Ft. 2000 Acres Regional Center 650,000 46.6 55,000 275,000 925,000 66.4 21,000 105,000 1,030,000 73.9 Other Commercial -- -- 22,600 113,000 113,000 8.6 41,000 205,000 318,000 24.0 (Total Commercial) (650,000) (46.6) (77,600) (388,000) (1,038,000) (75.0) (62,000) (310,000) (1,348,000) (97.9) Hotel (300 rooms) 11.0 -- -- (300 rooms) 11.0 -- -- (300 rooms) 11.0 Business Park -- -- 58,800 294,000 294,000 16.9 19,200 96,000 390,000 22.4 Industrial Park -- -- 66,000 330,000 330.000 21.6 94,000 470.000 800,000 52.6 Total Developed 650,000 57.6 202,400 1,012,000 1,662,000 124.5 175.2 876,000 2,538,000 183.9 (300 rooms) (300 rooms) (300 rooms) Phase I Phase 1I Phase 11I By 1990 1990 -1995 1995 -2000 1990 1990 5 -year 1995 1995 5 -year 2000 2000 Alternative Phasing Sq.Ft. Acres Per Year Growth Sq.Ft. Acres Per Year Growth Sq.Ft. Acres Regional Center • 485,000 34.8 88,000 440,000 925,000 66.4 21,000 105,000 1,030,000 73.9 Other Commercial -- -- 22,600 113,000 113,000 8.6 41,000 205,000 318,000 24.0 (Total Commercial) (485,000) (34.8) (110,600) (553,000) (1,038,000) (75.0) (62,000) (310,000) (1,348,000) (97.9) Hotel (150 rooms) 6.0 -- (150 rooms) (300 rooms) 11.0 -- -- (300 rooms) 11.0 Business Park 110,000 6.3 36,800 184,000 294,000 16.9 19,200 96,000 390,000 22.4 Industrial Park -- -- 66,000 330,000 330,000 21.6 94,000 470 000 800 000 52.6 Total Developed 595,000 47.1 213,400 1,067,000 1,662,000 124.5 175.2 876,000 2,538,000 183.9 (150 rooms) (150 rooms) (300 rooms) (300 rooms) 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Following the scoping process, the areas requiring discussion in this supplemental EIS were determined to be: circulation /traffic; sewage disposal; phasing; and site develop- ment standards. ALTERNATIVES Phasing Alternatives The development is proposed to occur in three general phases.. Phase I. would include three major department stores and approximately 60 smaller shops, for a total gross leasable area (GLA) of about 650,000 square feet. A 300 -room hotel may also be developed in Phase I. As an alternative, Phase I could include a smaller shopping center of approximately 485,000 square feet and 150 hotel rooms, with some of the difference replaced by up to 110,000 square feet of business park development. The balance of the property would be developed in future phases, dependent on financing and market conditions. The approximate site areas and GLAs for each phase and each use are shown in Table I, and the locations of the various uses are shown' in Figure 2. For comparative purposes, Table II shows the phasing previously proposed and analyzed in the 1981 EIS. TABLE I PROPOSED PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AREAS AND PHASING 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •m: 1 1 'SULLIVAN PARK CENTER Spokane County, Washington 1 1 1 / !Industrial Park Site Development Plan Wilsey & Ham Figure 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE II PREVIOUS PHASING (1981) The No Alternative Denial of the current request would leave in place the previous site development plan and the existing approved Restricted Industrial zoning with the condition of specific site development plan approval for each development proposal within the site. The existing zoning would allow a number of manufacturing and processing uses in addition to those in the proposal. The areas of the site previously proposed for sewage drainfields could also be developed in industrial uses under the current zoning. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MAJOR CONCLUSIONS Development Standards The conditioning of various site uses with appropriate development standards based on the proposed zoning code should provide at least as much protection as the existing requirement for specific site development plan review. 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 Transportation The proposed project will generate additional traffic demand on the adjacent road system. A plan for phasing of the project development and associated access improvements has been prepared to maintain traffic operations at acceptable levels of service. A number of on -site and off -site roadway improvements will be required in each phase of development. Included are the eastward extension of Indiana Avenue, signalization of the Sullivan /Indiana intersection and provision of additional interchange access to 1 -90. Phase I Phase II 1983 Sq.Ft. Ultimate Sq.Ft. Regional Center 880,000 1,038,000 Motel (150 rooms) (300 rooms) Business Park 94,000 294,000 Industrial Park -- 330,000 Total 974,000 1,662,000 (150 rooms) (300 rooms) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE II PREVIOUS PHASING (1981) The No Alternative Denial of the current request would leave in place the previous site development plan and the existing approved Restricted Industrial zoning with the condition of specific site development plan approval for each development proposal within the site. The existing zoning would allow a number of manufacturing and processing uses in addition to those in the proposal. The areas of the site previously proposed for sewage drainfields could also be developed in industrial uses under the current zoning. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MAJOR CONCLUSIONS Development Standards The conditioning of various site uses with appropriate development standards based on the proposed zoning code should provide at least as much protection as the existing requirement for specific site development plan review. 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 Transportation The proposed project will generate additional traffic demand on the adjacent road system. A plan for phasing of the project development and associated access improvements has been prepared to maintain traffic operations at acceptable levels of service. A number of on -site and off -site roadway improvements will be required in each phase of development. Included are the eastward extension of Indiana Avenue, signalization of the Sullivan /Indiana intersection and provision of additional interchange access to 1 -90. Sewage Disposal The proposed connection to public sewers would eliminate potential groundwater impacts from the previously proposed on -site disposal. 7 Alternatives, Including the Proposed Action Proposal and Objectives Hanson Properties, Inc. proposes a mixed -use development, Sullivan Park Center, on a 226 -acre site in Spokane County. The site is east of the City of Spokane and south of the Spokane River, on the north side of Interstate 90 at the Sullivan Road interchange as shown in Figure 1 in the Summary. The proposal includes a regional shopping center, commercial uses, a hotel /motel, a business park, an industrial park and passive park /open space along the river. The objective of the request is to gain approval of the site development plan (shown in Figure 2 in the Summary), conditioned by proposed development standards, so that the property can be platted for development of the specific uses with the assurance of coordinated and compatible phased development of the entire site over an estimated 15 -year period. Phasing Alternatives The development is proposed to occur in three general phases. Phase I would include three major department stores and approximately 60 smaller shops, for a total retail gross leasable area (GLA) of about 650,000 square feet. A 300 -room hotel may also be developed in Phase I. As an alternative, Phase I could include a smaller shopping center of approximately 485,000 square feet and 150 hotel rooms, with some of the difference replaced by up to 110,000 square feet of business park development. The balance of the property would be developed in future phases, dependent on financing and market conditions. The approximate site areas and GLAs for each phase and each use are shown in Table I in the Summary, and the locations of the various uses are shown in Figure 2 in the Summary. The proposed phasing of the development is based in part on a phased construction of traffic access improvements to maintain acceptable traffic conditions on Interstate 5 and at key intersections along Sullivan Road. The two Phase I alternatives would have similar peak -hour trip generation rates and would therefore have nearly identical traffic impacts. 8 Land Use Alternatives Two alternative development schemes were considered for the 52.6 -acre portion of the site east of Sullivan Road. The first scheme included a mix of business park and industrial park uses, and the second scheme included only industrial park uses, as follows: Scheme One Scheme Two Sq.Ft. Acres Sq.Ft. Acres Business Park 183,000 10.5 Industrial Park 642,000 42.1 800,000 52.6 Total 825,000 52.6 800,000 52.6 Although both schemes are feasible from marketing, design and utilities standpoints, scheme one would generate additional traffic at the key intersections along Sullivan Road and would require additional traffic mitigation measures to avoid congestion. Scheme two was therefore selected as part of the proposed development. Sewage Disposal Alternatives A county sewer interceptor is located in Sprague Street, about one .mile south. of the proposal site. The county plans to construct a trunk line which would pass the site and travel toward the southwest to the interceptor. If the timing of construction is right, the proposed Sullivan Park Center would connect to the trunk line. If construction of the trunk line is delayed, the sponsor proposes to construct an interim force main directly southward along Suliivan Road to the interceptor. A third possibility would be to utilize on -site drainfields for sewage disposal until the county trunk line is constructed, as was planned in the previous proposal in 1980. The third option, interim on -site disposal, has a potential for contamination of groundwater supplies and is not under consideration at this time. Either of the other two options is acceptable to the county and the sponsor, and neither would have significant adverse impacts. The No Alternative Denial of the current request would leave in place the previous site development plan and the existing approved Restricted Industrial zoning with the condition of specific 9 site development plan approval for each development proposal within the site. The existing zoning would allow a number of manufacturing and processing uses in addition to those in the proposal. The areas of the site previously proposed for sewage drainfields could also be developed in industrial or other uses under the current zoning. 10 Affected Environment, Significant Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ■ Elements of the Built Environment LAND AND SHORELINE USE Development Standards Subsequent to issuance of the 1981 FEIS, the land use of the subject property was reclassified from Agricultural Zone to Restricted Industrial Zone on March 6, 1981. The reclassification contained a provision requiring submission of a specific site development plan prior to construction approvals. The current development proposal is somewhat different from the original proposal. Since the sponsor would not be directly involved in construction of the individual buildings, specific site development plans are not available and are not part of the current proposal. In lieu of such specific plans, the sponsor is proposing that various defined parcels within the site be designated for specific types of uses, and that specific development standards be attached to each parcel to assure that the type, quality and character of future development would meet existing and proposed county standards. Approval of the proposed land use designations and specific development standards would allow the property to be marketed to developers of the specific uses with the assurance of coordinated and compatible phased development of the entire site. In preparation of the proposed development standards, three major county policy factors were considered: 1. Under the current "Restricted Industrial" classification, all of the uses proposed, and several additional uses, could be constructed anywhere within the site. This broad spectrum of permitted uses does not provide an adequate framework or sufficiently specific development standards for a coordinated and balanced mixed - use plan. 2. Development standards applicable to two additional classifications, "Commercial Zone" and "Local Business Zone," contained in the existing zoning code would be more restrictive and more appropriate for the retail, business and hotel portions of the proposal. However, there are still some aspects of these zones which may be too general to control future development to the degree necessary to adequately substitute for a specific site development plan. 11 3. The proposed new Spokane County Zoning Code contains three classifications, and attendant development standards, which could provide the desired level of specific controls. However, the timing of adoption and date of effect of the new code is uncertain at this time. Based on these points, the sponsor is proposing that the applicable proposed zoning development standards, along with certain additional standards, be attached as cove- nants to the specific parcels within the overall site. The following chart relates the parcels and their proposed uses to the applicable zoning code designations (refer to Figure 2 in the Summary). Proposed Existing Zoning Ordinance Use of Parcel Acres Classification Standards Regional Center 78.5 Commercial 19.4 Business Park Hotel Industrial Park 52.6 Total Developed 183.9 Commercial Zone (C) Local Business Zone (LB) 22.4 Local Business Zone (LB) 11.0 Commercial Zone (C) Proposed Zoning Code Classification Standards Regional Business (B -3) Zone Community Business (3-2) Zone Community Business (B -2) Zone Regional Business (B -3) Zone Restricted Industrial Zone (RI) Industrial Park (I -1) Zone The applicable provisions are contained in the Final Draft, Proposed Spokane County Zoning Code, dated December 1984. A draft of the proposed additional standards is included in Appendix D. In addition, the sponsor will submit detailed landscaping standards based on a master landscape plan for the property. These are proposed subject to approval of the Planning Department under section 8.06.020 of the Proposed Zoning Code. Impacts The conditioning of the proposal with the development regulations of the proposed zoning code should improve the future protection of the environment. Although the "specific site development plan" approval provided for in the previous reclassification would allow for county review of the development specifics, the proposed standards are more closely matched to the specific uses proposed, and reflect the latest analysis conducted by the county regarding the regulation of the proposed uses. 12 The EIS prepared for the proposed zoning code (November 1984) indicates that the code provides better defined sign, landscape and parking standards than now exist. The EIS also states that ". . . in all segments of the environment investigated, the new code improves environmental conditions over the existing zoning ordinance." Approval of the proposed development standards in lieu of a "specific, site development plan!' therefore should provide at least comparable protection against environmental impacts. County staff review and administrative approval of. each development. application, in light of the proposed standards, would provide the necessary enforcement. TRANSPORTATION Background A detailed transportation analysis of the proposed Sullivan Park Center was prepared in 1980 as a component of the original environmental impact statement (EIS). That transportation study included estimates of trip generation and distribution, traffic assignments, capacity analysis and a proposed mitigation plan to reduce adverse impacts on the surrounding roadway network. The ultimate development of the site and nature of land uses being considered in this supplementary EIS are tabulated in Table I in the summary, and can be compared to those of the original project, Table II. The current proposal includes development in three phases, while the original project was to be constructed in two phases. The original EIS traffic analysis determined that several improvements would be required to support the additional travel demands created by the combined effects of through and project traffic. Foremost among these was the need for reconstruction of the Interstate 90 interchange serving Sullivan Road to provide additional capacity. In this respect, the EIS recommended that an "urban interchange" be constructed at this location, and that it be combined with a grade separation of the Burlington Northern railroad tracks which roughly parallel 1 -90. A schematic drawing of the urban interchange proposal from the original EIS is shown in Appendix A. That EIS also recognized the need to widen Sullivan Road north of 1 -90, extend Indiana Avenue through the site, and signalize the Sullivan /Indiana intersection. In March 1981, the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee issued its findings and conditions related to the approval of the original EIS. The EIS examined the impacts of rezoning from Agricultural to Restricted Industrial land use under the zoning classifica- tions applicable at that time. With respect to transportation, the Committee did not 13 make a specific recommendation regarding the urban interchange concept for applica- tion at the I -90 /Sullivan interchange. The text of the Committee decisions is included in Appendix A. During the review of the original EIS, both the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and the Spokane County Engineering Department expressed concerns regarding the urban interchange. The urban interchange is an unconventional design which has been applied only in Florida, Kentucky and Georgia. It serves turning movements at the ramp terminals through a single signalized intersection directly above or below the freeway mainline. This design is particularly well- suited to areas with limited right -of -way availability and /or crossing arterials with at -grade intersec- tions in close proximity to ramp terminals. The concerns of the county engineering staff at that time were related to the uncertainty about the feasibility and funding of the urban interchange design. Specifi- cally, in October 1980, WSDOT indicated their long -range plans to upgrade the existing diamond interchange at the I -90 /Sullivan location, since right -of -way for such a reconstruction was readily available. In addition, approval of modifications to the interstate system requires the approval of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and it was not certain such a design would be acceptable. By mid -1983 WSDOT had begun preliminary planning of the upgraded I -90 /Sullivan interchange. In their analysis of the capacity of the urban interchange alternative, it was estimated that the intersection system along Sullivan Road proposed in the original EIS could not accommodate the combined demands of growth in through traffic and the added project traffic. This analysis revealed that the capacity of the urban interchange did not represent a significant improvement over that of an upgraded diamond interchange. The WSDOT concerns were detailed in a memorandum dated May 1983 also included in Appendix A. During 1983 and 1984, WSDOT proceeded in the development of an upgraded diamond design for the I -90 /Sullivan interchange. Agency planners concluded that neither the urban or diamond interchanges could adequately serve the ultimate size and mix of development proposed for Sullivan Park Center. In meetings among the proponent, WSDOT and the county, a phasing plan was developed to limit impacts at the I -90 /Sullivan interchange and on Sullivan Road. This supplementary EIS assesses traffic 14 impacts of the revised phasing plan as currently proposed, updates the projections of the original EIS, and provides a description of roadway modifications to mitigate potential adverse traffic impacts. Phasing Plan The two major factors considered in developing the proposed phasing schedule (see Table 1 in the Summary) were 1) economically feasible development staging of a regional shopping center and hotel and 2) traffic capacity and timing of major access improvements. The proposed Phase I development provides for an initial retail center with three major department stores, and for the full development of a 300 -room hotel. With the completion of the current improvements to the Sullivan Road interchange, along with signalization of an intersection at Sullivan Road and an extended Indiana Avenue, adequate traffic capacity would exist to support this first phase. The alternative Phase I would include a retail center with two major department stores, one -half of the proposed hotel, and about 110,000 square feet of business park. This mix of uses would have similar worst -case traffic impacts and could be accommodated with the same access improvements. Beyond either of these first phases, additional access capacity would be needed. The most effective single improvement would be the construction of an additional 1 -90 interchange approximately one mile west of Sullivan Road. This interchange, plus t/ additional extensions of Indiana Avenue, provide capacity to support the proposed Phase II development (see Table I). A regional shopping center with four or five major department stores, peripheral retail development, the 300 -room hotel and approxi- mately 300,000 square feet each of business park and industrial park development can be accommodated with the additional interchange, maintaining acceptable traffic conditions. The final phase of development would require further access improvements. With the new interchange in place, the connections to the south (to Evergreen Road) and possibly to the north would provide enough relief to allow Sullivan Road to perform adequately with full site development. The coordination of project phasing with access improvements should provide adequate control of traffic impacts. It is in the best interest of both the sponsor and the 15 developers of the specific uses proposed, as well as the county and the state, to phase the improvements so that employees, tenants and customers are not adversely affected by local traffic conditions. Existing Conditions The existing roadway network in the site vicinity was described in detail in the original EIS. The roadway inventory data remains current, and updated traffic counts are presented in Figure 3. Traffic counts were supplied by Spokane County Engineering. Department and WSDOT and represent a composite of the available daily and peak hour volumes during 1982 and 1983. Using the 1978 -79 counts as a baseline, the growth in background traffic was computed to be between 3 and 5 percent annually. Accident patterns at the I -90 /Sullivan ramps reflect the increasingly congested conditions at this interchange. The two ramp terminals probably meet the traffic signal warrants for uninterrupted traffic suggested in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). With the current WSDOT construction project, both ramp terminals will be signalized. These actions should improve the accident experience at these intersections. Future Conditions Without the Project Projections of future background traffic volumes in the project vicinity were derived from WSDOT, County Engineering Department and Spokane Regional Planning Confer- ence (SRPC) sources. In WSDOT's I -90 Corridor Study, average daily traffic on 1 -90 for the year 2002 has been projected according to historical growth trends. To insure a conservative analysis, WSDOT year 2002 projections were utilized for the year 2000 traffic analysis in this EIS. The projected average daily traffic (ADT) on 1 -90 west of Sullivan Road is estimated to increase from the existing 30,000 vehicles per day (vpd) to 56,000 vpd, and from 23,000 vpd to 41,000 vpd east of Sullivan Road. These traffic projections are currently in a preliminary stage of development, and may change slightly with final publication this summer. A parallel study by the SRPC has produced uniformly lower traffic estimates on the freeway. It should be noted that the current projections are significantly lower than those used in the original EIS. That document anticipated 80,700 vpd on 1 -90 west of Sullivan, and 71,600 vpd east of the Sullivan interchange. These figures included the traffic impacts of a second regional shopping center and extensive residential development to the south. 16 A +� A! ! A Se OS A A a IIIIII MTh 110 A s s m 0 tc e e c Q. O O N N Sprague Avenue m O 0 h Euclid Avenue 1 -90 0 �2 O Broadway Avenue Ch 1 mi. SULLIVAN PARK CENTER 0000 vehicles per day Existing Daily Traffic Volumes Wilsey & Ham Figure 3 The proposed second regional center was to be located east of Sullivan Road and north of Broadway Avenue. The Valley Mall would have included 650,000 square feet of gross leasable area plus additional peripheral commercial, office and restaurant space. The traffic study for the Valley Mall was prepared in 1978, projecting 31,240 daily trip ends, with 1,180 inbound trips and 1,275 outbound trips in the 4:00 to 5:00 pm peak hour. Approximateey 45 percent of these trips were forecast to pass through the I -90 /Sullivan Road interchange. The traffic study for the Valley Mall was based on 1976 traffic counts and a 1985 completion date, so that the projections of that study are outdated and no longer applicable to the current situation. The zoning approval for the Valley Mall is scheduled to expire in October 1985 and no application for an extension of this approval is being processed. The earlier traffic analyses for Sullivan Park Center did not specifically consider traffic related to Valley Mall, since it is likely that only one such center could be supported in the Spokane Valley. A regional center such as that under consideration requires a market population of 100,000 to 150,000 persons. The population forecasts for the year 2000 indicate approximately this population for the eastern Washington and northern Idaho market area. Thus, it is likely that only one regional center could be economically justified in this area. Traffic volume growth on Sullivan Road was derived from earlier projections by the Spokane Regional Planning Conference. These estimates reflect traffic growth in the range of 3 to 5 percent. The projections do not appear to be affected by revisions in the freeway volume projections, nor are the ramp volumes significantly affected. Projections of average daily traffic for 1990, 1995 and 2000 without the project are shown in Figure 4. Traffic operations at the intersections along Sullivan Road for these conditions are summarized in Table III. The capacity analyses were performed using the reconstructed I -90 /Sullivan inter- change geom etrics which are currently under construction. The need for additional freeway capacity in the I -90 Corridor Study is being studied by WSDOT. That study may determine the need for six - laning of I -90 in the vicinity of the site. The existing cross - section and bridge structures along 1 -90 are such that widening could be accomplished by adding median lanes in the existing right -of -way. 18 +I o _ _ at is a um fl s t.. a ! ow — , M .Ir 44800 53800 64000 Sprague Avenue 18600 21800 26000 0 1/2 Euclid Avenue SULLIVAN PARK CENTER 1990 vehicles per day 1995 • 2000 • ° Projected Daily Traffic Volumes without the project Wilse & Ham Figure 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1- 1 1 it TABLE III INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE* *Level of service is a qualitative measure which describes operating conditions occurring on a given roadway or intersection. Levels of service (LOS) range from LOS A to LOS F with LOS A denoting free flow, low volumes and adequate traveling speeds. LOS F, on the other hand, describes forced flow operation at substantially reduced travel speeds and congested traffic volumes. LOS C is generally used as the design capacity under rural conditions and LOS D under urban conditions. In the long range, the county is planning to widen Sullivan Road to six lanes south of 1 -90. No schedule has been established for this project, nor has funding been identified. It is expected to be completed by the year 2000. The widening would extend from Sprague Avenue north to the southernmost I -90 ramp, but would not continue through the 1 -90 interchange. The levels of service computations did not consider this widening of Sullivan Road, since it is not a programmed project. Project Traffic Impacts The impacts of the proposed project are analyzed in three phases for the years 1990, 1995 and 2000. The study for this supplemental EIS includes an analysis of daily and pm peak hour conditions for these years, accounting for the combined effects of the growth in background traffic and the addition of project - related traffic. Trip generation associated with development of the site, the distribution of trips throughout the region, assignment of new trips to the surrounding roadway network, and the ability of the roadway system to accommodate future traffic volumes have been examined. There have been significant changes in traffic conditions and projections since the earlier studies. These changes include the addition of a larger ultimate (year 2000) development phase, reconstruction of the I -90 /Sullivan interchange (currently under- way), revisions to future background traffic forecasts, and revisions to population and employment forecasts within the market area. 20 1990 1995 2000 Sullivan /South Ramps Sullivan /North Ramps A A A A A A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1- 1 1 it TABLE III INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE* *Level of service is a qualitative measure which describes operating conditions occurring on a given roadway or intersection. Levels of service (LOS) range from LOS A to LOS F with LOS A denoting free flow, low volumes and adequate traveling speeds. LOS F, on the other hand, describes forced flow operation at substantially reduced travel speeds and congested traffic volumes. LOS C is generally used as the design capacity under rural conditions and LOS D under urban conditions. In the long range, the county is planning to widen Sullivan Road to six lanes south of 1 -90. No schedule has been established for this project, nor has funding been identified. It is expected to be completed by the year 2000. The widening would extend from Sprague Avenue north to the southernmost I -90 ramp, but would not continue through the 1 -90 interchange. The levels of service computations did not consider this widening of Sullivan Road, since it is not a programmed project. Project Traffic Impacts The impacts of the proposed project are analyzed in three phases for the years 1990, 1995 and 2000. The study for this supplemental EIS includes an analysis of daily and pm peak hour conditions for these years, accounting for the combined effects of the growth in background traffic and the addition of project - related traffic. Trip generation associated with development of the site, the distribution of trips throughout the region, assignment of new trips to the surrounding roadway network, and the ability of the roadway system to accommodate future traffic volumes have been examined. There have been significant changes in traffic conditions and projections since the earlier studies. These changes include the addition of a larger ultimate (year 2000) development phase, reconstruction of the I -90 /Sullivan interchange (currently under- way), revisions to future background traffic forecasts, and revisions to population and employment forecasts within the market area. 20 Land Use Phase I Phase 11 Phase 111 Building Area PM Peak Daily Trip Ends (vpd) Trips (vph) In Out Building Area PM Peak Daily Trip Ends (vpd) Trips (vph) In Out Building Area PM Peak Daily Trip Ends (vpd) Trips (vph) In Out Commercial 650,000 sq.ft. 24,180 1,034 1,073 1,038,000 sq.ft. 38,510 1,453 1,972 1,348,000 sq.ft. 45,984 1,483 1,901 Business Park 294,000 sq.ft. 3,205 71 529 390,000 sq.ft. 6,268 94 703 Hotel 300 rooms 3,150 108 111 300 rooms 3,150 108 111 300 rooms 3,150 108 111 Industrial Park 330,000 sq.ft. 1,802 106 208 800,000 sq.ft. 3.505 255 504 Total 27,330 _ 1,142 _ 1,184 46,667 1,738 2,820 58,907 1,940 3,219 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Trip Generation Estimates of trip generation were derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) document Trip Generation (third edition). Daily and peak hour forecasts for project - related traffic are summarized in Table IV. A total of approxi- mately 27,000 daily vehicle trip ends are projected for Phase 1, 47,000 in Phase II, and 59,000 in Phase III. The directional trip estimates for the afternoon peak hour are also presented for each phase. An alternative first phase is also under consideration • by the proponent, and is described in Table I in the Summary. The trip generation of this alternative Phase I would be 27,250 daily trips, and 1,200 outbound trips in the pm peak. Thus, the critical volume of peak -hour traffic would be nearly identical in either plan. TABLE IV PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Trip Distribution Trips were assigned to the roadway network on the basis of zonal population forecasts prepared by the Spokane Regional Planning Conference in February 1985. These forecasts include both population and employment predictions for the years 1990, 1995 and 2000. Population forecasts were also obtained for Kootenai County, Idaho to reflect the eastern portion of the market area. A simplified gravity model was used to distribute trips among these zones, using travel time as a measure of impedance. Compared to the original EIS, the Spokane County population forecasts for the year 2000 have remained relatively stable at approximately 412,000 persons, although there 21 have been slight changes among zones. However, the Kootenai County long -range forecasts have been revised from 85,000 persons in the original EIS to 72,000 in this current study, resulting in a significant drop in patrons and employees attracted from the east. Separate trip distribution estimates were prepared for different trip purposes. For retail, commercial and hotel trips, the market area is constrained on the west by competing commercial opportunities in the Spokane CBD and close -in suburbs. Work trips for on -site employees at the business and industrial parks are attracted from 'a broader area. Overall, approximately 27 percent of the trips approach the site on I -90 from the west, 17 percent on 1 -90 from the east, and 30 percent on Sullivan Road from the south. Sixteen percent approach on Sullivan Road from the north, and 10 percent on Pines Road from the north and south. Traffic Assignment Vehicular traffic was assigned to the roadway network using the trip distribution estimates described above. The traffic assignments vary according to the mix of development in each phase, the location of specific land uses on the site, and the roadway system configuration in each phase. For instance, some traffic related to the business park uses at the far western end of the project will use the I -90 interchange at Pines Road, but traffic to the industrial park at the eastern end of the site will use the I -90 interchange at Sullivan Road. During Phase I of the project, nearly all the site - related traffic from 1 -90 will use the Sullivan interchange. In the Phase 11 development, there is a potential for additional freeway access at a new interchange midway between the existing Pines and Sullivan interchanges. By Phase III, additional connections of the surface streets are possible. Several alternatives are presented on Figure 5. On the east end, Indiana Avenue could ultimately be extended to Flora Road, with an intersection at Mission Avenue. At the proposed new I -90 /Evergreen Road interchange, both northward and southward connections may be feasible. To the south, the interchange could connect to the arterial network at Evergreen Road, if the difficult topographic constraints can be overcome. To the north, this street could extend across the railroad tracks to Pines Road or across the Spokane River to a terminus to be established in future planning. 22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SULLIVAN PARK CENTER Sullivan Road Intersection Plan Phases 11 and 111 Wilsey & Ham Figure 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE VI PHASE II INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE 1995 - with the project These results indicate that supplementary freeway access will be desirable to serve the combined demands of background and project traffic during the second phase of project development. An earlier analysis by WSDOT in 1984 confirmed this finding, determin- ing that the first phase level of development was the maximum which could be served through the upgraded I -90 /Sullivan interchange. The proposed new 1 -90 interchange would be located between the Pines and Sullivan interchanges. The spacing will create weaving sections on I -90, caused by the proximity of adjacent entrance and exit ramps. The I -90 analysis focused on these weaving areas as being the critical links from a capacity viewpoint. In the 1995 pm peak, the freeway weaving sections will operate at level of service C with two directional lanes, and at level of service A if an additional auxiliary lane is provided. Presented in Table VII, the Phase III project impacts also were evaluated with and without the proposed new I -90 interchange. In the long range, there is projected to be a serious deterioration in service levels without the proposed new interchange. The Phase III analysis also indicates that a connection from the new interchange south to Evergreen Road would be desirable. From a system point of view, such an action would relieve both the Pines and Sullivan arterial corridors and interchanges. Up to five percent of total project traffic would utilize the Evergreen corridor. This level of project traffic would translate to an additional daily traffic load of approximately 3,000 vpd, and 260 total vehicles in the pm peak hour. While the project could double the ADT on Evergreen Road to 5,000 or 6,000 vpd, the combined traffic demand could still 29 Without Proposed Interchange With Proposed Interchange Level of Service V/C Ratio Level of Service V/C Ratio Sullivan /south ramps Sullivan /north ramps Sullivan /Indiana D C E 0.80 0.76 0.96 B C D 0.68 0.71 0.89 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE VI PHASE II INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE 1995 - with the project These results indicate that supplementary freeway access will be desirable to serve the combined demands of background and project traffic during the second phase of project development. An earlier analysis by WSDOT in 1984 confirmed this finding, determin- ing that the first phase level of development was the maximum which could be served through the upgraded I -90 /Sullivan interchange. The proposed new 1 -90 interchange would be located between the Pines and Sullivan interchanges. The spacing will create weaving sections on I -90, caused by the proximity of adjacent entrance and exit ramps. The I -90 analysis focused on these weaving areas as being the critical links from a capacity viewpoint. In the 1995 pm peak, the freeway weaving sections will operate at level of service C with two directional lanes, and at level of service A if an additional auxiliary lane is provided. Presented in Table VII, the Phase III project impacts also were evaluated with and without the proposed new I -90 interchange. In the long range, there is projected to be a serious deterioration in service levels without the proposed new interchange. The Phase III analysis also indicates that a connection from the new interchange south to Evergreen Road would be desirable. From a system point of view, such an action would relieve both the Pines and Sullivan arterial corridors and interchanges. Up to five percent of total project traffic would utilize the Evergreen corridor. This level of project traffic would translate to an additional daily traffic load of approximately 3,000 vpd, and 260 total vehicles in the pm peak hour. While the project could double the ADT on Evergreen Road to 5,000 or 6,000 vpd, the combined traffic demand could still 29 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 be accommodated at level of service B on a two -lane road. Signalization of the Mission /Evergreen intersection would be required if significant through- traffic volumes are attracted to this corridor. TABLE VII PHASE III INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE 2000 - with the project A similar situation exists with the connection of Indiana Avenue to Flora Road. Less than five percent of project traffic would utilize this access route, but that level of project traffic could triple the total traffic volume on Flora Road south of Mission Avenue. However, traffic can be served at level of service C on this two -lane facility. Operating conditions on I -90 with the Phase III traffic will be at level of service D if two directional lanes are provided in the weaving area, and level of service C if an auxiliary lane is provided east of the new interchange. Mitigating Measures and Design Considerations The traffic impact analysis has been structured to examine roadway improvement needs through a 15 -year planning horizon of project development. The original EIS recognized the need to reconstruct the 1 -90 /Sullivan interchange to serve the total traffic demands projected for the area. Additional traffic planning studies in 1983 and 1984 with WSDOT and county engineering further advanced the concept of phased development and staged implementation of roadway improvements. It was during this time that the plan for the ramp modifications at the I -90 /Sullivan interchange was developed. These slip ramps were designed to be constructed without major changes to the interchange 30 Without Proposed Interchange With Proposed Interchange and Evergreen Connection(s) Level of Service V/C Ratio Level of Service V/C Ratio Sullivan /south ramps Sullivan /north ramps Sullivan /Indiana E 0.90 D 0.86 F 1.02 C 0.77 D 0.80 D 0.89 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 be accommodated at level of service B on a two -lane road. Signalization of the Mission /Evergreen intersection would be required if significant through- traffic volumes are attracted to this corridor. TABLE VII PHASE III INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE 2000 - with the project A similar situation exists with the connection of Indiana Avenue to Flora Road. Less than five percent of project traffic would utilize this access route, but that level of project traffic could triple the total traffic volume on Flora Road south of Mission Avenue. However, traffic can be served at level of service C on this two -lane facility. Operating conditions on I -90 with the Phase III traffic will be at level of service D if two directional lanes are provided in the weaving area, and level of service C if an auxiliary lane is provided east of the new interchange. Mitigating Measures and Design Considerations The traffic impact analysis has been structured to examine roadway improvement needs through a 15 -year planning horizon of project development. The original EIS recognized the need to reconstruct the 1 -90 /Sullivan interchange to serve the total traffic demands projected for the area. Additional traffic planning studies in 1983 and 1984 with WSDOT and county engineering further advanced the concept of phased development and staged implementation of roadway improvements. It was during this time that the plan for the ramp modifications at the I -90 /Sullivan interchange was developed. These slip ramps were designed to be constructed without major changes to the interchange 30 construction which is currently underway. Also, required in Phase I is the extension of Indiana Avenue eastward to Sullivan Road, and signalization of the Sullivan /Indiana intersection. The preliminary design of improvements along Sullivan Road is influenced by the limited distance (approximately 600 feet) between the four -lane Spokane River bridge crossing and the I -90 north ramp terminal. There is currently a Burlington Northern (BN) rail crossing within this area, and WSDOT requires that adjacent intersections be located at least 300 feet from the nearest ramp terminal. In 1984, a plan was developed to locate the Indiana Avenue intersection midway between the ramp terminal and the bridge crossing, and to relocate the BN crossing north of the proposed Sullivan /Indiana intersection. By early 1985, it was revealed that BN is contemplating abandonment of the rail spur in this area. Currently, few trains utilize this spur, which serves fewer than four businesses near Barker Road. The spur has already been abandoned east of Barker Road. Burlington Northern has indicated that it will file for abandonment during the summer of 1985. In addition, WSDOT is requesting that the Sullivan Road grade crossing be eliminated with their current construction contract. These actions will maximize the capacity of the intersection system along Sullivan Road. The proposed new 1 -90 interchange design has been developed conceptually and is being considered among the improvement alternatives in WSDOT's I -90 Corridor Study. The WSDOT study is examining systemwide 1 -90 improvements, and the emphasis in the immediate vicinity is to relieve the congested conditions in the Pines Road corridor. Any proposed widening or interchange improvements along 1 -90 are subject to review and approval by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). In addition, an independent environmental review is required prior to any improvements to the interstate system, under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). During Phase II of the project, the proposed interchange would be connected north only to the Indiana Avenue extension. The proximity of the new interchange to the major on -site traffic generators will divert a significant amount of traffic from the Sullivan interchange, and a lesser amount from the Pines interchange. The connection of Evergreen Road to the proposed I -90 interchange is a system alternative which could effectively serve the needs of through traffic and project traffic. Other alternatives may be available to accomplish the same system objectives, and these will need to be identified and evaluated in a design study. 31 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Currently, Evergreen Road is designated as a major arterial in the county's functional classification plan. It is consistent with the general one -mile spacing of arterials in the Spokane Valley. Evergreen Road is a two -lane facility north of Sprague Avenue, passing mainly through residential areas, and terminating at Mission Avenue. Preliminary estimates indicate that the connection from I -90 to the Mission /Evergreen intersection could be accomplished with grades ranging from 4 to 8 percent. (See Appendix C.) Additional study will be needed to investigate the design details of this proposed facility, and its related environmental and community impacts. A similar situation exists with the possible connections to the north from this interchange. None of these future connections is precluded by development of the site. The possible extension of Indiana Avenue eastward to Flora Road is also a long -range improvement alternative. The county is considering a bridge across the Spokane River to connect Flora Road northward to the adjacent industrial park. Flora Road also could be served by I -90 if ramps could be constructed at the existing undercrossing. However, WSDOT is not examining this option in their current I -90 Corridor Study. The potential of Flora Road to serve the needs of through traffic and project traffic would be significant if both these improvements were implemented. Summary of Transportation Improvements The conceptual approach to improvement of the transportation network is presented on Figure 5. These improvements, together with appropriate signalization and other traffic control devices, will mitigate the adverse impacts of the project and provide enhanced circulation and safety for through traffic. At this stage in the planning process, costs of construction and right -of -way acquisition have not been prepared. The project proponent will construct the on -site roadway improvements to county design standards and dedicate the associated right -of -way. In addition, the proponent will bear responsibility for numerous off -site improvements. However, the sponsor will seek the participation of the county in those improvements which offer significant benefits to non - project traffic. In addition, the burden of responsibility for off -site costs can affect the economic feasibility and.success of the future project phases. The specific roadway improvements proposed for Phase I, as determined in this traffic study, include the extension of Indiana Avenue as a two -lane facility in the western portion of the site, and as a four -lane divided facility east to Sullivan Road. The right - of -way width, drainage requirements and roadway design will comply with applicable 32 county design standards. The intersection at Sullivan Road will be signalized, and the I -90 /Sullivan interchange modified as shown on Figure 7. The conceptual layout of the site - related improvements is presented on Figure 5. In advance of the implementation of Phase II, the proponent will prepare a design report for the proposed new I -90 interchange at Evergreen Road. This design report will fulfill the county's requirement for updating of the traffic forecasts after the completion of Phase I. In addition, the design report will comply with WSDOT and FHWA guidelines to evaluate the various design options for the interchange. The capacity analyses indicate that the connection of the proposed new interchange south to Evergreen Road will not be required until Phase III of the project. However, the design report will examine options for earlier implementation of this connection. Obviously, the timing of this improvement is closely linked to that of the county's proposed widening of Sullivan Road south of 1-90, and that project also must be considered in the design report. The roadway improvements for Phase II include construction of the proposed new I -90 /Evergreen interchange, together with the associated auxiliary weaving lanes on I -90 eastward to the Sullivan interchange ramps. Evergreen Road will be constructed as a four -lane divided section north from the new interchange to Indiana Avenue. In Phase II, Indiana Avenue will be widened from two lanes to five lanes in the western portion of the site. The Sullivan /Indiana intersection and the I -90 /Sullivan interchange will be modified as shown on Figure 8 and Indiana Avenue will be extended eastward from Sullivan Road as a five -lane section. Ultimately, Indiana Avenue may be extended to Flora Road at its junction with Mission Avenue. Until this connection is completed, the portion of Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road could remain a private street. It will be constructed to county design standards initially so that it could be dedicated upon completion of the extension to Flora Road. The technical analysis indicates that the south connection to Evergreen Road from the proposed new I -90 interchange is not needed to relieve Sullivan Road until Phase III. However, the disposition of this long -term recommendation will ultimately be addressed in the interchange design report. The preliminary analysis indicates that the connection is feasible, and three alternative alignments are presented on Figure 5. The need for traffic control devices at the intersection with Mission Avenue will be determined in the design report. 33 The connections of Evergreen Road northward from Indiana Avenue were not specifi- cally considered in the technical analysis. None of these connections is required to support the Sullivan Park Center project. The alternatives shown on Figure 5 are intended to demonstrate that future northward extensions of Evergreen Road are not precluded by implementation of the development proposal. In all phases, implementation of roadway improvements intended for dedication will pass through several levels of review by the appropriate county, state and federal agencies. These location and design reviews will provide additional opportunities for interaction with the proponent regarding details of the specific improvements. UTILITIES Sewage Disposal The 1980 DEIS and 1981 FEIS analyzed the potential impacts on groundwater quality from the then - proposed on -site disposal of treated wastewater. This on -site disposal was to be an interim measure that would be eliminated at an unspecified future time with connection to an anticipated public sewer system. The anticipated sewer interceptor is now available, and the proposal has been modified to include initial connection to the public sewer system. Since on -site wastewater disposal would not be used, the potential impacts to groundwater supplies previously presented would not occur. Sewering of the site eliminates the previous requirement for committing approximately 30 acres of the site to septic tank drain fields. This land has been redesignated for development and is included in the site areas shown in the proposed phasing schedule (see Table I in the Summary). The current engineering studies indicate that sewage flows from all phases of the proposal can be fully accommodated by the county's interceptor and treatment facilities. The interceptor is located in Sprague Street, approximately one mile south of the proposal site. A future county trunk line is proposed which would carry sewage toward the southwest to the interceptor from a pumping station near Sullivan Road, north of 1 -90. The timing and funding of this trunk line is uncertain at present, although recent interest has been expressed by a few landowners including the sponsor. If the line is not constructed in time to serve Phase I of the proposal, two options are available. The first option would be to return to interim on -site disposal, as was 34 included in the previous proposal, but sized to accommodate only a smaller Phase I and probably to be used for a shorter time period. The second option would be for the sponsor to construct an interim force main southward along Sullivan Road to the interceptor. This second option would be preferable from art environmental standpoint since it would eliminate the potential for groundwater. contamination. The sponsor has also indicated a preference for the interim force main option and is prepared to construct such a line if the county's trunk line is not available for Phase I. 35 References Highway Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report No. 87, Washing- ton, D.C., 1965. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation (third edition), Washington, D.C., 1983. Spokane County Planning Department, Draft EIS for Spokane County Zoning Code, Spokane, Washington, November, 1984. Spokane County Planning Department, Spokane County Zoning Ordinance, Spokane, Washington, January, 1984. Spokane County Planning Department, Sullivan Park Center Environmental Impact Statement, Draft EIS (Volume 1), Technical Appendix (Volume 2) and Final EIS (Volume 3), Spokane, Washington, September 1980- February 1981. Spokane County Planning Department, Zoning Code (Proposed Final Draft), Spokane, Washington, December 1984. Spokane Regional Council, 1990, 1995 and 2000 Population and Employment Forecasts, Spokane, Washington, February, 1985. Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Circular No. 212, Washington, . D.C., January 1980. U.S. Department of Transportation (FHWA), Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Washington, D.C., updated 1985. Washington State Department of Transportation, Interstate 90 Corridor Study, (to be published summer 1985). 36 Distribution List Federal Department of Transportation, Portland, Olympia Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle Postal Service, Spokane Soil Conservation Service, Spokane State Department of Commerce and Economic Development Department of Community Development Department of Ecology (2 copies) Department of Fisheries (2 copies) Department of Game (3 copies) Department of Natural Resources (2 copies) Department of Social and Health Services (2 copies) Department of Transportation (2 copies) Energy Office Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Office of Financial Management Office of the Governor Utilities and Transportation Commission Regional Spokane County Regional Planning Conference (2 copies) Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority Board of County Commissioners (3 copies) Boundary Review Board Central Valley School District //356 Chief Civil Deputy (2 copies) Conservation District County '208' Study East Valley School District #361 Engineering Department (3 copies) Fire District #1 Health District (2 copies) Hearing Examiner Comittee (4 copies) Parks and Recreation Department Planning Department (20 copies) Sheriff's Office Utility Department 37 City of Spokane City Manager Office of the Mayor Planning Department Planning Manager Public Works Department Transit System Zoning Office Neighboring Communities City of Coeur d'Alene Office of the Mayor City of Post Falls Office of the Mayor Kootenai County, Board of County Commissioners Town of Millwood Utilities Bonneville Power Administration Consolidated Irrigation District #19 Inland Power and Light Pacific Northwest Bell Valley Garbage Service Washington Water Power Libraries Spokane County Public Library (2 copies) Spokane Public Library Media KHQ TV KPBX TV KREM TV KXLY TV Spokane Community Press Spokane Daily Chronicle The Spokesman- Review The Valley Herald Others Burlington Northern Railroad Council for Land Care and Planning R.A. Hanson Company, Inc. Spokane Area Development Council Spokane Audubon Society Spokane Area Chamber of Commerce Valley Chamber of Commerce 38 1 Appendices 1 1 1 1 1 1 '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II APPENDIX A Transportation Analysis Background Materials 39 Urban Interchange Design (proposed in Sullivan Park Center original EIS) s stls sass sal s a a S — a MN a 1 -90 '••.., Alignme t Alternatives � • • • Th w Broadway Avenue Phase 11 e 0 0 e c Phase 111 Sprague Avenue 0 1/2 1 Euclid Avenue 1 -90 1 ml. SULLIVAN PARK CENTER - -phase 1 phase 11 phase 111 Proposed Road Improvements & Alternatives Wilsey & Ham Figure 5 It should be emphasized that none of these long -range projects are indicated in the county's transportation plans, and are therefore not programmed or funded. Implemen- tation of these improvements could occur through commitments of the proponent and other developers, county and /or state actions, or combinations of both. The focus of the interchange alternatives is to examine the systemwide need for additional north - south arterial capacity, and to provide relief for the Pines and Sullivan corridors. These alternatives will be refined, and others developed, during the planning process. The traffic assignments were performed to account for the phased implementation of roadway improvements in the vicinity of the site. A proposed scenario of improvements is presented in Figure 5. In the traffic assignment procedure, the extension of Indiana Avenue eastward to Sullivan Road was assumed to be constructed in Phase I, together with the slip ramp connections to the I -90 /Sullivan interchange. For Phase II, traffic assignments were prepared with and without the proposed new I -90 interchange. In this phase, the interchange would be connected to the north only as far as the Indiana Avenue extension. The traffic assignments for Phase III examined two potential street connections which could be completed by the year 2000 planning horizon. First, the assignments included a connection from the new interchange south to Evergreen Road. For this phase, estimates of diversions of through traffic from the Pines and Sullivan corridors were not available, so a systemwide traffic assignment was not performed; Instead, a sketch plan was prepared to determine the project- related traffic using Evergreen Road. Second, Indiana Avenue might be extended eastward to Flora Road. The Phase III traffic assignments did not include this connection, but a sketch plan analysis was prepared to address this issue, due to the uncertainties inherent in these long -range forecasts. Projections of future daily traffic with the project are shown on Figure 6 for each phase of development. A detailed analysis of pm peak -hour volumes along Sullivan Road also was conducted. These estimates of turning movements for each phase are provided in Appendix B. The assignments of trips to the roadway system accounted for "captured" traffic which is already using the network in the vicinity of the site for some other purpose. These captured trips do not represent the introduction of new traffic, but rather the diversion of trips from other retail areas. In this analysis, a capture rate of 15 percent was assumed for retail traffic. 24 s MN OW la l _ fl mu mpg r is — a se la — — EN we Broadway Avenue Sprague Avenue 51200 64840 78042 m 0 cc 0 0 c a. 22392 28343 34322 29010 38467 47003 32829 41651 50841 Euclid Avenue 0 1 ml. SULLIVAN PARK CENTER 1990 vehicles per day 1995 2000 • ^ • Projected Daily Traffic Volumes with the project Wilsey & Ham Figure 6 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 Capacity Analysis Using the forecasts of background traffic and project traffic, capacity computations were prepared to determine traffic operations on surrounding roadways. Included in the detailed capacity analyses are the I -90 freeway and the system of signalized intersec- tions on Sullivan Road. Conditions were examined for the pm peak hour for each analysis year. The 1 -90 analysis was based on the 1965 Highway Capacity Manual, and accounted for the effects of weaving maneuvers on the freeway mainline. Capacity analysis for the intersections was accomplished using CAPCALC, an intersection capacity analysis program based on the critical movement methodology in the Transpor- tation Research Board Circular 212. The analysis for Phase I of the development reflects the presence of signalization at both 1 -90 ramp terminals on Sullivan Road and at the proposed Indiana Avenue intersection. The preliminary design for the proposed interim connections of the slip ramps has been developed in cooperation with WSDOT and county engineering, as indicated on Figure 7. This configuration reduces weaving maneuvers on Sullivan Road. 1990 traffic operations, with the completion of Phase I, are summarized below: TABLE V PHASE I INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE 1990 - with the project *v /c ratio indicates volume divided by capacity of the roadway. On the 1 -90 freeway west of Sullivan Road, traffic operations will be maintained at level of service C. In general, level of service D is an acceptable condition during peak hours in urban areas. The Phase II capacity analysis was performed with and without the proposed new interchange, using 1995 traffic forecasts. In addition, the extension of Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road will require modification, as shown on Figure 8. 26 Level of Service V/C Ratio* Sullivan /south ramps B 0.62 Sullivan /north ramps B 0.60 Sullivan /Indiana D 0.89 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 Capacity Analysis Using the forecasts of background traffic and project traffic, capacity computations were prepared to determine traffic operations on surrounding roadways. Included in the detailed capacity analyses are the I -90 freeway and the system of signalized intersec- tions on Sullivan Road. Conditions were examined for the pm peak hour for each analysis year. The 1 -90 analysis was based on the 1965 Highway Capacity Manual, and accounted for the effects of weaving maneuvers on the freeway mainline. Capacity analysis for the intersections was accomplished using CAPCALC, an intersection capacity analysis program based on the critical movement methodology in the Transpor- tation Research Board Circular 212. The analysis for Phase I of the development reflects the presence of signalization at both 1 -90 ramp terminals on Sullivan Road and at the proposed Indiana Avenue intersection. The preliminary design for the proposed interim connections of the slip ramps has been developed in cooperation with WSDOT and county engineering, as indicated on Figure 7. This configuration reduces weaving maneuvers on Sullivan Road. 1990 traffic operations, with the completion of Phase I, are summarized below: TABLE V PHASE I INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE 1990 - with the project *v /c ratio indicates volume divided by capacity of the roadway. On the 1 -90 freeway west of Sullivan Road, traffic operations will be maintained at level of service C. In general, level of service D is an acceptable condition during peak hours in urban areas. The Phase II capacity analysis was performed with and without the proposed new interchange, using 1995 traffic forecasts. In addition, the extension of Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road will require modification, as shown on Figure 8. 26 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 . 1 SULLIVAN PARK CENTER Sullivan Road Intersection Plan Phase 1 missy & Ham Figure 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER Thle No. ZE- 180 -78 A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on March 6, 1981, and the members of the Committee present being Jane Myers, Chairperson, Eldon Thomas and Ron McVicker. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Spokane Mall Associates, is requesting approval of a zone reclassifi- cation, File No. ZE- 180 -78, Agricultural to Restricted Industrial for the purpose of developing a shopping mall, offices, and light industrial uses. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, commercial, 1 -90, Spokane River, and undeveloped. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for indus- trial development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 7. That the applicant has demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the pro- posed rezone is justified. 8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor dis- approval of the proposed use. 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 11. The. following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) The proposed request is for a logical land use of the area. 1 D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2 - The No. ZE- 180 -78 1. The specific development plan will be submitted for Hearing Examiner Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 2. All current standards of the Restricted Industrial Zone, as amended, shall be complied with in the development of this site. 3. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning storm- water runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff. 4 That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolution #77 -1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this applicatioi, and prior to any on -site improvements. 5. That, pursuant to WAC 197 -10 -040 (2)(a) and 120), WAC 197 -10 -155 and SCEO 11.00.055, the rezone is an action !•ubject to SEPA, but insufficient detail concerning the proposal is available to permit mean- - ingful environmental analysis at the rezone level, Consequently a detailed site plan, subject to full compliance with Chapter 43.21C RCW, shall be submitted for consideration to the Hearing Examiner Committee at a later date. Furthermore, it is hereby stipulated that, because of project details not now available, the Committee may require additional information pursuant to WAC 197 -10 -330 and may deny or condition the approval of said project at the site plan review stage, pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.060 RCW. 6. That, pursuant to Chapter 43.21C, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), an environ- mental impact statement was prepared. Mitigating measures as• identified in the Environmental documents shall be complied with in the develop- ment of a specific site plan for future review and approval. 1. The existing roadway network in the vicinity of the Sullivan Park Center can not effectively handle the estimated traffic which will be generated by (serve) the proposed site. 2. Department of Transportation letter dated October 7, 1980, first para- graph: "It should be noted that a Diamond Interchange has been recommended by the Department, not the "Urban Interchange" as stated in the Appendix" 3. Draft Environmental Impact Statement, 1. Introduction and Summary, page 6, paragraphs 2 and 3: Sullivan Road /Interstate 90 Interchange - An "L'rban Interchange" is required to provide an acceptable level of service at this intersection. It should be constructed as a six-lane divided section with dual -left turning lanes in all quadrants of the intersection. - tile No. ZE- 180 -78 The "Urban Interchange" concept has substantially greater traffic carrying capacity than a conventional diamond interchange and requires substantially less right -of -way. Both of these features are crucial in the development of Sullivan Park Center. It should be noted that without the "Urban Interchange" this intersection could not accommo- date the mall and peripheral densities proposed. 4. Because adequate access can not be guaranteed, the "Urban Inter- change" may not be constructed and the existing railroad grade cross- ing relocated, we therefore recommend denial of this proposed zone change. c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized east of Sullivan Road with provisions being made for future public sewers. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW, Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improve- ment district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. 4 That provisions be made for public sewers west of Sullivan Road. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Findings: a) This project lies over the Spokane Aquifer. b) It is within Critical Water Supply Service Area 143 and within the service area of Consolidated Irrigation District. Groundwater resources appear adequate to support development at this density. c) The project is inside the 201 Sewer Study Area Zone 3 and inside the Primary Sanitary Sewer Area recommended in the "208" Study. The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities pursuant to County Resolution 80 -0418 adopted March 24, 1980. The topography and soils in the area are gen- erally suitable for use of individual on -site sewage systems. The lot is of the proper dimensions to permit use of both an individual well and sewage system. 3 COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 2. Recommendations: a) Water service must be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. b) Water service shall be by an existing public water supply. . c) The use of individual wells is not authorized. d) Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. e) Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems may be authorized. f) The owner, his heirs, and successors shall agree to not protest legal assessments and utility local improvement districts to provide central sewerage service to lots in this plat. g) A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health Officer prior to the issuance of any building permit for this lot. 1. Recommend approval with condition that prior to development of this property that an engineered water distribution system plan shall be submitted to the Spokane County Department of Building and Safety. This distribution plan shall include water main size, flows, locations, fire hydrant type and locations, water storage tanks size, and location and design criteria. WATER PURVEYOR - mile No. ZE- 180 -78 1. Purveyor is Consolidated Irrigation District #19, and they will supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. g) SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. Mains and hydrants to be installed, in accordance with the Spokane County Department of Building and Safety. 2. A plan for emergency equipment access is required to be submitted prior to any land development. h) DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1. A surface land mine reclamation permit and reclamation plan shall be required if more than two acres of contiguous land is to be disturbed or more than 10,000 yards of mineral is removed in any type mining operation. (For example, the removal of top soil or any other aggre- gate type of material to be sold or used for construction off the pro- posed development site.) E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Spokane Mall Associates, for a zone reclassification as described in the application should be approved. Motion by: Thomas Seconded by: McVicker Vote: Uninamous to Approve (3 -0) ATTEST: WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Director By: 7?•y /Va/ 4/ � /•_, Date: /, - - ,YI 5 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE n �-) Chairperson 'tile No. ZE- 180 -78 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 I DATE: ' FROMr ' PHONE: May 2, 183 Wayne Gruen /L Stan Moon /Don Lund INTRADEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION - • Fergestrbm Y SUBJECT: SR 90 Sullivan Road Urban I/C & - Sullivan Road and Indiana Avenue Intersection L 6332 In response to yaur request dated April 20, 1983, we, with Kris Gupta's staff, analyzed the above referenced subject using the "Transportation Research Circular" Number 212 on Interim Materials on Highway Capacity. Our analysis utilized the estimated year-1985 and year 2000 pm peak traffic data :,Lich included developer's shopping center and peripheral - trips and planning application for determining level of service. The results of the capacity analysis are as follows: 1. Urban Interchange with 1985 traffic will be operating at Level of Service "E ". cc: Kris Gupta 2. Urban interchange with year 2000 traffic will be operating at Level of Service "F" or interchange failure. 3. Sullivan Road and Indiana Avenue grade intersection with 1985 traffic will be operating beyond Level of Service "E" or intersection.failure. Also, the right turns from Indiana Ave. of 1329 vph"over capacity. This intersection was not analyzed with year 2000 traffic since failure occurred in 1985. 4. Weaving length between E -N ramp to loop ramp is critical because this weave will cause queues in traffic that could affect the operations of the urban interchange. 5. In addition, the developer assigned over 50 percent of the shopping center trips from SR 90 east of Sullivan Road with 117 vph assigned to Pines Road Interchange. If these 117 vph are reassigned to Sullivan Road Interchange would further compound the weave problem so that over 240 vph may have to be reaasigned to left turn at the Indiana Avenue intersection which would cause the intersection operations to collapse. It should be noted that the 1985 Shopping Center trips represent average , weekday conditions. Shopping traffic volumes will vary significantly • daily or seasonally due to such factors as special sale events, holiday seasons, weather, etc. The attachment from the Traffic Engineering Study for SeaTac Mall lists the estimated vehicular traffic that will be generated by SeaTac Mali on an average and peak weekday, Friday, and Saturday. WTG/LRF:sk I JOHN SPELLMAN Governor STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Transportation Building • Olympia, Washington 98504 • (206) 753 -6005 Mr. H. R. Hammond Transportation Engineer Wilsie and Ham P. 0. Box C -97304 Bellevue, Washington 98009 Dear Mr. Hammond: June 21, 1984 Re: SR 90 Sullivan Park Center Traffic Impact Analysis and Design Study Thank you for your letter of March 9, 1984, which provided a copy of the "Traffic Impact Analysis and Design Study" report concerning the above - referenced project. It has been a pleasure working with you through the numerous meeting3 and other discussions which have resulted in this report. The report includes considerable detailed information relative to traffic projections and resultant levels of service from both background traffic and traffic anticipated as a result of development of the proposed shopping center. We have reviewed this material and in general concur with your traffic projections and analysis. The report includes general design details for several features which are necessary to maintain the minimum desired Level of Service "D" for traffic operations. The design features and Levels of Service calculations are generally considered acceptable as presented in the report. The report concludes that traffic generated by the initial phase of development of the shopping center can adequately be accommodated with the current WSDOT design for an upgraded diamond interchange at Sullivan Road. To maintain satisfactory traffic operations would however require the construction of access ramps between Indiana Avenue and the westbound off- and on -ramps of I -90. These access connections would parallel Sullivan Road both on the east and the west. These 3 DUANE BERENTSON Secretary H CEIVED JUN 271984 WILSEY & HAM, INC. Mr. H. R. Hammond June 21, 1984 Page 2 connections are not a part of the WSDOT updated plan. Therefore, construction funding will not be provided by WSDOT and is the responsibility of others. The acceptability of this plan is based on the initial phase of development of the shopping center being limited to approx- imately 650,000 square feet of gross leasible area. Any expan- sion beyond that level of development for the first phase would not be acceptable to the Department without additional access and capacity provisions. The report also draws conclusions relative to access needs for the ultimate development of the shopping center and peripheral area. We concur with the finding that to adequately serve the full development will require an additional access to the area from Interstate 90. Without such an access, Sullivan Road and possibly other interchanges in the area will breakdown and, thus not be able to provide the appropriate level of service to the traveler. WSDOT concurrence with development beyond the first stage would require commitment to providing an additional access point to service the area. We have appreciated the cooperative attitude of you and your staff. We appreciate the opportunity to review the final report and have no comments or recommendations for modifications in it. We will be pleased to continue working with you on plans to adequately serve the public as the development con- tinues through additional stages. If you have any questions or wish to discuss any of this material further, please feel free to contact me or Ron Hart in our District 6 office in Spokane. SAM:tw cc: A. D. Andreas Ron Hart Gary Kennali, Spokane Cty. Raymond Hanson Sincerely, S. A. MOON, P.E. Location - Design Engineer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 After reviewing your letter dated June 21, 1984 to Randy Hammond and ' discussing the subject matter with Ron Hart of the WSDOT- Spokane, it is our understanding that our consultants may now proceed with design, planning and preliminary engineering for a Master Site Development Plan incorporating the access plans outlined below for submittal to Spokane County. ' Although the WSDOT SR -90 R/W Plan Sheets 13, 14, and 15 of 25 Sheets referenced by letter as C.S 3203- R/W2728 delivered by WSDOT Right -of- Way Agent, David McCoury, on June 5, 1984, indicate by "hatch marks" the prohibited access zones, we understand that upon approval of final ' design and engineering by the WSDOT, access will be permitted through the prohibited access zones in the following locations. ' 1. I -90 /Sullivan Road A West -bound off - connecting access ramp from the 1 -90 off ramp to Sullivan Road paralleling the East side of Sullivan Road and inter- secting with Indiana Avenue, and a West bound on- connecting access ramp from Indiana Avenue paralleling the West side of Sullivan Road and merging with the Sullivan Road West bound on -ramp to 1 -90. 1 1 1 1 RAHCO. Inc. RAHCO Disc., Inc. R. A. Hanson Co., Inc. Hanson Properties, Inc. R. A. Hanson Mining Co. Mr. S. A. Moon Location - Design Engineer Department of Transportation State of Washington Transportation Building Olympia, Washington 98504 Dear Mr. Moon: P. O. Box 7310 • Spokane. Washington 99207 • U.S.A. • (509)467 -0770 • Telex 326474 July 11, 1984 V ECEIVED JUL 1G1984 WILSEY & HAM, INC. Re: SR 90 Sullivan Park Center Traffic Impact Analysis and Design Study 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mr. S.A. Moon ' Page Two 2. Second Access Point A new interchange in the general vicinity East of the alignment of Evergreen Road with a direct North -South unimpeded connection from 1 -90 to Indiana Avenue. In order to develop a viable Master Land -Use and Infrastructure Plan, our consultants will have to include future considerations of circulation, utilities, etc. in the current planning and design phases. Therefore, to avoid any future misunderstanding and to insure that there is a mutual meeting -of- the -minds among the State, and County Agencies, and our consultants, we have presented hereinabove our basis in establishing planning direction. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for the cooperation and assistance you and your staff have been providing our consultants. MT:cls cc: Ron Hart - WSDOT, Spokane Randy Hammond, Wilsey & Ham Gary Kennaly, Spokane County Engineer Dick Simpson, Simpson Engineering Raymond A. Hanson Frank B. Carr Rex Smart Very truly yours, HANSON PROPERTIES, INC. Mike T$ramoto 0 JOHN SPELLMAN Governor Mr. Mike Teramoto Hanson Properties, Inc. P.O. Box 7310 Spokane, WA 99207 Dear Sir: STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office o( District Administrator • North 2714 Mayfair Street, Box 5299, North Central Station • Spokane, Washington 99205 October 3, 1984 DUANE BERENTSON Secretary L 6332 Project 65066 S Sullivan Road Interchange Sullivan Park Shopping Center Your letter of July 11, 1984, acknowledged and commented on Mr. S. A. Moon's letter of June 21, 1984, relative to the above proposed development. You have requested us to more clearly state our position relative to what_ is expected from Hanson Properties, Inc., as a part of development at this location. Mr. Moon's above - referenced letter does establish the Department's position on this subject. This has been reviewed and is supported by top management of our Headquarter's department. As discussed with Mr. Moan during our July 19, 1984 meeting, we have established our specific requirements of the developer at this time. In reply to your questions, the following applies. 1. In regard to your concerns about our current access and right of way plan not showing the slip ramps between Indiana Avenue and the I -90 westbound off and an ramps: These will not be shown until such time as we do have a specific proposal and are prepared to process that proposal with supporting data through Federal highways for concurrence. WSDOT will further be willing to approve and recommend approval by FHWA of these features, and will require that they be constructed by the developer to mitigate impacts of the proposed initial phase of development for your shopping center. This will be dependent upon Indiana Avenue being constructed as a public road operated by the County and both Indiana Avenue and the ramps being open to all traffic users. Without this feature, Sullivan Road Interchange as now proposed by the Department cannot adequately serve the projected 1990 traffic volumes. Mike Teranoto October 3, 1984 Page 2 2. In reference to your request of our support for a second interchange on 1 -90 in the vicinity of the extended alignment of Evergreen Road: The Department does support and will recommend approval of a second access point to serve this area. We not only will support, but feel this is essential for the ultimate phase of development as proposed. As noted before, however, WSDOT at this time does not have funding for such construction and would look to the developer to finance this feature as part of the required access for ultimate development of this proposed center. Briefly, but not limited to, certain steps must be taken before a second access point could be secured at any location on an interstate facility. This would include preparation of an access point supporting document, processing for approval by WSDOT and approval by Federal Highways through Division, Region and the Washington D.C. offices. As we know, this is a time consuming process and may take up to two years. Environmental Actions, Design and Access Hearing Processes will be in order. In our discussions with Mr. Moon, you advised that the initial phase of development would probably be reduced to nearly 350,000 or 400,000 square feet of leasible area with the ultimate development being in the range from 600,000 to 700,000 square feet. The Traffic Impact Analysis provided to us in March identified .a first -stage of 650,000 square feet of leasible area. Since this seems to be in the range of what may now be proposed for ultimate development of this site, Mr. Moon has sane concern over possible confusion of the Department's position relative to needed access. The requirements outlined above and in Mr. Moon's letter of June 21, 1984, addressed the 650,000 relative to 1990 traffic impacts. If this now is to be the ultimate size of the development, then traffic impacts for the year 2000 should be developed and used as a minimum. From our previous analysis, it appears that this could not be accommodated solely through the Sullivan Road Interchange even with the additional slip ramps as required above. If there are further concerns in regard to the State's position, please contact us at your convenience. Mr. Moon has further requested for future correspondence to be directed to the District Office. truly yours, WRH:vh cc: S.A. Moon HQ Records Control Location File ,r R R. RNING, R. RNING, P.E. District Administrator RAHCO. Inc. RAHCO Disc.. Inc. R. A. Hanson Co.. Inc. Hanson Properties, Inc. R. A. Hanson Mining Co. Mr. Walter R. Horning, P.E. District Administrator Department of Transportation State of Washington Box 5299 North Central Station Spokane, Washington 99205 Again, thanks. MT :cis cc: S.A. Moon, Ron Hart a, Raymond Hanson Frank Carr, Rex Smart bcc Duaine Rasmussen P. O. Box 7310 • Spokane, Washington 99207 • U.S.A. • (509) 467-0770 • Telex EC;EIVED October 10, 1984 OCT 121984 WILSEY & HAM, INC. Re: L6332 Project 65066S Sullivan Road Interchange Sullivan Park Shopping Center Dear Mr. Horning: Thank you for your letter dated October 3, 1984 clarifying the require- ments and procedures pursuant to the subject project.. With regard to the confusion relative to the scale of the proposed development, I apologize for the misunderstanding which I created. My intentions, on July 19, 1984, in discussing the possibilities of reduced densities were solely to evaluate relative potential impacts. For the record, we are still projecting towards a development of the magnitude outlined in Mr. Hammond's submittal of March 9, 1984 and as acknowledged by Mr. Moon's letter dated June 21, 1984. We anticipate that the formal plan approval process along with the corresponding environmental analysis will commence through the Spokane County Planning Department within the next 60 days. We will definitely keep your staff apprised and involved through out the proceedings. We would like to express our sincere appreciation to you, Mr. Moon, Mr. Hart and your staff for the professional assistance you have so graciously provided to our consultants and staff. Very truly yours, HANSON PROPERTIES, INC. Mik- ramoto APPENDIX 13 Traffic Volume Projections 54 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 t 410 N SULLIVAN PARK CENTER 000 without project •000• with project PM Peak Turning Movements Phase 1 Wilsey & Ham Figure 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 • 1 0 It 15 111$'• 560 G R 880 .419 •1445 • 250 A •SIB. 1 h-__ 3s• • — •234• •154• I •81obFo 61 1 1 6,5 •2;3 — � - ' 21 --s .•450n . 134 i�a5 an °ke ns V21D 130 •1138' �J 200 A SULLIVAN PARK CENTER 000 without project • 000 • with project PM Peak Turning Movements Phase 11 Wilsey & Ham Figure I �►� F �'.a77� •11 —a 225 •653, 1 .;� } • � I � 65 C ,— too s7 ► 720 60 .1 32'1• • 2 13; 4 21 •- •22 Von ?,5 • /I L .449. i (220 73o n 3t3- 0 sp an 200 r .231. r j v er SULLIVAN PARK CENTER 00o without project •000. with project PM Peak Turning Movements Phase II with Evergreen Interchange Wilsey & Ham Figure 0 Sp 200 T riv er SULLIVAN PARK CENTER 00o without project •000• with project PM Peak Turning Movements Phase 111 Wilsey & Ham Figure 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 spO ke ne 200 r � v er N I SULLIVAN PARK CENTER coo without project • 000• with project PM Peak Turning Movements Phase III with Evergreen Interchange wanly a Ham Figure 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX C Preliminary Plan I -90 Proposed Interchange 60 1 1 1 1 1 0905 1 1 sa °too 5667N PROPOSED - w '3 vv___/_-7: N \ \ \ 9 \ I- STA. 401468 ENO PROPOSED �-N @MR 0 SULLIVAN • PARK CENTER 1-90 PROPOSED INTERCHANGE t STA. Aereemt PRELIMINARY PLAN PROPOSED OYE@'ROSS/N6 . - pRoPosso we: TN/40 LANE 41— 4— 4— EXIST R/W PROPOSED 68_,/ TH/RO LA/V� R STA. 0400 PROPOSED ARTERIAL r exist 771/ 1-50 STA. SGROO.0 2- ■ APPENDIX D Architectural Guidelines 62 DRAFT OF SULLIVAN PARK CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS BOARD ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES 1.1 Design Standards Board: Pursuant to the Sullivan Park Center Declaration of Restrictive Covenants as recorded under Spokane County Auditor's File Number , the Design Standards Board shall have the right to review and thereby either approve or reject all plans and specifications for any building or structure to be constructed or modified within the properties which do not conform to said restrictive covenants recorded under said Auditor's File Number and the Architectural Guidelines of Sullivan Park Center. Further, one registered architect and one registered landscape architect shall be appointed by the Owners to serve on the Board in a professional capac- ity. 1.1.1 No improvements as herein defined shall be erected, placed or altered on any building site in said development until the building, landscape, or other improvement plans, specifica- tions, and plot plans showing the location of such improvements on the particular building site have been submitted to and ap- proved in writing by the Design Standards Board as to conformity and harmony of external design with existing structures in the development, and as to location of the improvements on the build- ing site, giving due regard to the anticipated use thereof as same may affect adjoining structures, uses and operations, and as to location of the improvements with respect to topography, grade and finished ground elevation and as to submitted land- scape plan, part of which shall be design layout, grading plan showing two -foot contour intervals and spot elevations, plant- ing plan, construction detail drawings and specifications, un- less and until such right has been expressly assigned and then such right will pass to such assignee. It shall be the obligation of each owner to familiarize himself with the restrictive covenants and the rules, regula- tions, and procedures of the Design Standards Board. All costs incurred by the Design Standards Board for inspections, plan . review and consultants shall be paid for by the applicant. 2.1 Approval Procedures: 2.1.1 Any approval requested of the Design Standards Board shall be requested in writing and shall be submitted to Hanson Properties, Inc. headquarters unless the Design Standards Board records an instrument establishing a different place to submit such plans. 2.1.2 Approval shall be based, among other things, on adequacy of site dimensions, storm drainage considerations, conformity and harmony of external design with neighboring structures, improve- ments, operations and uses; relation of topography, grade and finished ground elevation of the site being improved to that of neighboring sites; proper facing of main elevation with respect to nearby streets; and conformity of the plans and specifications to the purpose and general plan and intent of these covenants. The Board shall not arbitrarily or unreasonably withhold its ap- proval of such plans and specifications. 2.1.3 In the event the Design Standards Board fails to ap- prove or disapprove in writing such design location within thirty (30) days after said plans and specifications have been submitted to it, these guidelines will be deemed to have been fully complied with. If the construction or alteration of improvements is begun in violation of the terms and conditions of paragraph 1.1.1 or without the written approval required in other sections hereof and no suit to enjoin the erection, establishment or alteration of such improvements has been commenced prior to the completion thereof, these guidelines will be deemed to have been fully complied with. The decision of a majority of the members of the Board shall be the decision of the Board. 2.1.4 The Board, in the discharge of its obligations here- under and in its deliberations, shall act objectively and fairly in making decisions concerning various plans, specifications, plot plans and landscape plans submitted to it by various owners for consideration. Further, the determinations of the Design Standards Board, as to non - compliance, shall be in writing signed by the Board and shall set forth in reasonable detail the reason of non- compliance. 2.1.5 The Design Standards Board and /or its successors or assigns shall not be liable in damages to anyone so submitting plans for approval or to any owner or owners of land covered by this instrument by reason of mistake in judgement, negligence or nonfeasance of itself, its agents or employees, arising out of or in connection with the approval or disapproval, or failure to approve any such plans, likewise anyone so submitting plans to the Design Standards Board, for approval, by the submitting of such plans and any owner by so acquiring title to any of the property covered hereby, agrees that he or it will not bring any action or suit to recover for any such damages against the Design Standards Board. 3.1 Right of Entry of Board Representative: Any agent or officer of the board may at any reasonable pre- determined hour or hours upon twenty -four (24) hours notice during construction or exterior remodel- ing, enter and inspect any of said property as to its maintenance or improvements to determine if there has been compliance with the pro- visions hereof. The Board and any agent or officer thereof shall not thereby be deemed guilty of any manner of trespass for such entry or inspection. 3.2 Evidence of Compliance with Restrictions: Records of the Board with respect to compliance with the provisions of the Guide- lines shall be conclusive evidence as to all matters shown by such records. After the expiration of six (6) months following the completion of any construction, addition, alteration or change to any building on a building site, in the absence of any notice to comply or in the absence of any suit to enjoin such work or to force compliance by change or removal of such work within said period, then and in that event said structure work, improvement or alteration shall be deemed to be in compliance with the provisions of these guidelines. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 4.1 General Architectural Restrictions 4.1.1 Minimum Setback Lines and Lot Coverage A. Lots 1 through 15 and lots 19 and 20 are subject to the provisions of the current Spokane County Zoning Code dealing with Local Business (Chapter 4.09) or the pro- posed County Zoning Code provisions for Community Business (Chapter 6.26). B. Lots 16 through 18 are subject to the provisions of the current Spokane County Zoning Code dealing with Commercial Zone (Chapter 4.10) or the proposed County Zone Code provisions for Regional Business (Chapter 6.28). C. Lots 21 through 36 are subject to the provisions of the current Spokane County Zoning Code dealing with Restricted Industrial (Chapter 4.11) or the proposed County Zoning Code provisions for Industrial Park (Chapter 6.30). D. Tracts A through F are subject to the provisions of the current Spokane Zoning Code dealing with Agriculture (Chapter 4.04) or the proposed County Zoning Code pro- visions for General Agricultural (Chapter 6.40). 4.1.2 Completion of Construction A. After commencement of construction of any improvements, the owner shall diligently prosecute the work thereon, to the end that the improvements shall not remain in a partly finished condi- tion any longer than reasonably necessary for completion thereof. In any event, the construction shall not extend beyond a period of two years from commencement without approvals for extension by the Design Standards Board. The owner of any site or lot on which improvements are being constructed shall at all times keep public and private streets contiguous to said site or lot free from any dirt, mud, garbage, trash or other debris which might be occasioned by construction of the improvements. 4.1.3 Excavation A. No clearing or excavation or substantial site alterations shall be made except in connection with construction of an improve- ment, and upon completion thereof exposed openings shall be back - filled and disturbed ground shall be graded and leveled. 4.1.4 Landscaping A. Every site on which a building shall have . been placed shall be landscaped according to plans approved as specified herein and maintained thereafter in a sightly and well -kept condition. Such landscaping shall conform to Sullivan Park Center land - scaping•master plan and guidelines. B. The front yards of all lots shall be landscaped from the edge of the street and highway curbs. Each lot shall be landscaped except for buildings and similar structures, walks, paved parking areas, driveways and storage areas. All of such lots shall, as a 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 minimum requirement, be covered with ground cover seeding, lawn, bark, river rock or plantings, such as trees and shrubs, which will prevent wind or water erosion of earth and weed growth. C. The owner, leesee or occupant of any site or lot shall at all times keep the landscaping in good order and condition. Should the owner, lessees or occupant of any site or not fail to remedy any deficiency in the maintenance of the landscaping within twenty (20) days after proper notification, the Board hereby expressly reserves the right, privilege, and license to make any and all corrections or improvements in landscape maintenance at the expense of the site owner, lessee, or occupant, as the case may be. 4:1.5 Signs A. All signs must be in conformance with Spokane County regula- tions.and are in addition, subject to Design Standards Board review and approval. 4.1.6 Parking Areas A. No parking of any vehicles is permissible outside the boundaries of any lot in Sullivan Park Center. B. All parking areas shall be paved with asphalt or concrete. C. All parking area planters shall be provided for and land- scaped in accordance with the Sullivan Park Center landscaping master plan and guidelines. D. Details for parking layout and landscaping for such areas shall be provided with the submittal for Design Standards Board approval E. Parking areas shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner. F. All parking areas shall have adequate illumination to be effective for night use and general security. 4.1.7 Storage, Loading Areas, and Fencing A. Materials, supplies or any finished products or semi- finished products stored on the property outside of said buildings shall be confined to permanently screened areas within building setback lines. The said materials shall be stored in orderly piles not exceeding a height of twelve (12) feet and shall be completely screened by architecturally designed and constructed screens so as to conceal the view of the products from all sides of the property. The storage area shall be a drained and gravel surface, or better. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 B. No loading docks may be located on any street frontage unless architectural screening approved in writing by the Design Standards Board is provided. Loading dock areas shall be screened with evergreen plantings and /or attractively designed architectural screens, so as to reasonably conceal the dock from view from the street and from neighboring properties. The screening shall receive approval in writing by the Design Standards Review Board. Excep- tions to this provision must be approved in writing by the Design Standards Board. These conditions do not apply to industrial uses or apply to freeway frontage. C. No fence, masonry wall, hedge, or mass planting shall be permitted to extend beyond the building lines established herein except upon approval in writing by the Design Standards Board. Chain -link fencing shall have wood strips or other natural material to provide a screening effect. In any event, all fencing, walls or similar structures are subject to the approval by the Design Standards Board. D. All trash containers shall be screened from view by adequate means. 4.1.8 Building Regulations A. Any buildings in Sullivan Park Center shall be construc- tive architectural concrete, masonry, architectural aluminum and glass, wood frame, or any combination of same that is acceptable to the Design Standards Board. All types of such construction above, or any types not so covered must be first submitted and obtain written approval of the Board. No prefabricated metal buildings, sheds, or metal covered structures are permitted. This provision is not intended to exclude the use of aluminum die cast curtain walls or similar architecturally compatible features. B. Finish building materials shall be applied to all sides of a building which are visible to the general public as well as from neighboring property and streets. Colors shall be harmonious and compatible with colors of the natural surroundings and other adjacent buildings. The Board shall have the sole right to approve or disap- prove materials and colors so controlled. C. No building or other improvements shall be permitted to fall into disrepair and each improvement shall at all times be kept in good condition and repair and adequately painted or otherwise finished in accordance with specifications established by the Board. The Owner hereby grants to the Board the right to make any neces- sary alterations, repairs or maintenance approved by the Board to carry out the intent of this provision and the Owner further agrees to reimburse the Board for any expenses actually incurred in carry- ing out the foregoing. 1 4.1.9 Specifics 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 A. Temporary buildings, other than a contractor's field office or construction shelter, shall not be permitted. Furthermore, these shelters may remain for the period of construction only, after which time they must be removed. Temporary improvements used solely in connection with the construction or sales of permanent approved improvements may be permitted provided they are located as incon- spicuously as possible and are removed immediately after completion of such construction. B. No antenna for transmission or reception or television signals or any other form of electro- magnetic radiation shall be erected, used or maintained on the property outside any building whether attached to an improvement or otherwise, without the prior approval of the Board. C. No lines, wires, or other devices for the communication or transmission of electric. current or power, including telephone, television and radio signals, shall be constructed, placed or maintained anywhere in or upon the property unless the same shall be contained in conduits or cables constructed, placed and maintain- ed underground or concealed in, under or on buildings or other ap- proved improvements, provided electrical transformers and other distributive facilities may be placed on grade, but shall be attractively landscaped. Nothing herein shall be deemed to forbid the erection and use of temporary power or telephone services incident to the construction of approved improvements. Primary electrical transmission lines are excluded from the above. D. Garbage and refuse containers shall be concealed and con- tained within buildings, or shall be concealed by means of a screening wall of material similar to and compatible with that of the building. These elements shall be integral with the concept of the building plan, be designed so as not to attract attention, and shall be located in the most inconspicuous manner possible. Unless specifically approved by the Board in writing, no materials, supplies or equipment shall be stored on the property except inside a closed building, or behind a visual barrier screening such areas so that they are not visible from neighboring streets or property. E. Private streets, drives, curbs and walks shall be con- structed or altered in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to and approved in writing by the Board. All public streets are to be constructed to county standards. F. No storage tanks, including but not limited to those used for storage of water or propane gas, shall be permitted on the property unless approved by the Board in writing. G. No mailboxes shall be permitted on the property except as approved by the Board in writing. H. No air conditioning equipment which is visible on the exterior of any improvement shall be permitted on the property unless approved by the Board in writing. Approval shall be based upon adequacy of screening and landscaping of such equipment. 4.1.10 Curb Cuts A. In order to properly and efficiently regulate the flow of motor vehicular traffic, all curb cuts into streets must be approved prior to construction by the Design Standards Board and shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifica- tions therefor. 5.1 Maintenance: 5.1.1 Owners shall maintain their properties and any and all improvements thereto in a manner that will not depreciate the value of other properties in Sullivan Park Center. Exposed, painted sur- faces of buildings, structures, or other improvements or signs will be kept in good condition, and landscaping will be kept watered, weeded, and free of dead material. Yard lights will be kept pro- perly lamped. Parking areas and landscaping shall be kept free of trash or waste. The Design Standards Board may after written notice to such of the Owners as are delinquent in this respect, perform any work necessary to bring the property into conformance with the provisions of this paragraph and charge such delinquent Owner with the cost and expense thereof. 5.1.2 Maintenance and upkeep of designated common areas and street boulevard landscaping will be accomplished under the super- vision of the Design Standards Board as follows: The Design Standards Board will contract for such work by accepting, in its reasonable judgement, the lowest responsible bid therefor. The costs and expenses of such work shall be charged and prorated to the Owners upon the basis of the square footage of land in Sullivan Park Center as the same relates to the square footage of any such land owned by each of the Owners. The Owner hereby grants to the Board the right to make any necessary alterations, repairs, or maintenance approved by the Board to carry out the intent of this provision and the Owner further agrees to reimburse the Board for any expenses actually incurred in carrying out the foregoing. 6.1 Review Fee: An architectural review fee shall be paid by the applicant to the Design Standards Board at such time as plans and specifications are submitted for approval based on the following schedule: 6.1.1 In the case of an initial site plan including all features such as buildings, landscaping, fencing, etc., the review fee shall be $500.00. • 6.1.2 In the case of additional structures or landscaping and fencing, the fee shall be based on the scope of work to be reviewed but shall not be less than $50.00 and no more than $500.00. 7.1 General: 7.1.1 All structures and activities within Sullivan Park Center shall conform to the following documents: A. All applicable federal, state, and local regulations and codes. B. Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions recorded under Auditor's File Number C. Sullivan Park Center conditions of approval. D. Sullivan Park Center landscaping master plan and guidelines. 7.1.2 Effect of Municipal Ordinances A. Police, fire and other public safety ordinances of any municipal corporation having jurisdiction over any portion of the properties shall govern where more restrictive than these guide- lines. 7.1.3 Intrepretation of Guidelines A. The Board shall have the right to determine all questions arising in connection with the Guidelines and to construe and interpret the provisions of the Guidelines, and its good faith determination, construction or interpretation shall be final and binding. 7.1.4 Enforcement A. The Board or any owner shall have the right to enforce by any proceeding at law or in equity all restrictions, conditions, covenants and reservations imposed by the provisions of these Guidelines and a similar right shall exist with respect to recovery of damages for any such violation. Failure of the Board or of any owner to enforce any guidelines herein contained shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereunder. 7.1.5 Every person who submits plans to the Board for approval agrees, by submission of such palns, and every owner or lenses of any of said property agrees, by acquiring title thereto or interest therein, that he will not bring any action, proceeding or suit against the Board to recover any such damages. In case of conflict between plan review and the covenants herein contained, these covenants shall govern the rights and obligations of the parties. The above Guidelines were approved by the Design Standards Board on the day of , 1985. By: Chairman PRELIMINARY SULLIVAN PARK CENTER Final: Addendum to O Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ADDENDUM TO DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT for SULLIVAN PARK CENTER (Supplement to Sullivan Park Center Final EIS - February 1981) in compliance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 Chapter 43.21C RCW, as amended Revised SEPA Rules, effective April 4, 1984 Chapter 197 -11, Washington Administrative Code Spokane Environmental Ordinance Chapter 11.10, Spokane County Code September 1985 To Whom it May Concern: COVER MEMO This addendum, together with the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Sullivan Park Center issued in June 21, 1985, constitutes the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Sullivan Park Center. The Spokane County Planning Department, as lead agency, has determined that no substantial revisions to the text of the Draft SEIS are necessary. All comment letters received, along with responses, are included in this addendum. Additionally, several questions raised by county staff are responded to following the responses to letter comments. Finally, two possible modifications to implementation of the proposal have developed since publication of the DSEIS. A potential change in specific approvals, and a possible variation in the land use mix of Phase I, are discussed below. Neither of these changes would result in increased impacts or in significant changes to the project as presented in the DSEIS. Proposed Zoning Code At the date of this printing, the county is in the process of considering the adoption of the new proposed Spokane County Zoning Code. If adopted, the new code is expected to become effective early in 1986. Should this occur, it would result in a change in the method of implementation of the proposal. As discussed on page 12 in the Draft SEIS, the sponsor is currently requesting approval of a mixed -use development plan with specific land parcels designated for certain ranges of uses, and conditioned by development standards based on applicable classifi- cations contained in the proposed code. If the new code becomes effective, the request would be modified to include reclassification to the appropriate zones, as listed on page 12 of the Draft SEIS. Although the mechanism would be different, the result would be identical and the level of environmental protection would be the same. The lead agency has therefore determined that the analysis of impacts in the Draft SETS applies equally to implementation through development standards covenants, or through reclassification. Variation Within Phase 1 Sincerely, r 7tXT ro Cos4E. THIS wicc Td /(E /J 4/T7c-E jiyC ;rv0y 7 /MIN O /Z /c5-//V - tC Y re/ (10(// 7. Wallis D. Hubbard Spokane County Planning Director Fact Sheet Proposal Title - Description - Location - Implementation Date Proposal Sponsor Lead Agency Responsible Official - Contact for Questions, Comments, Information Approvals Required Author /Principal Contributor Date of Issue of Draft SEIS Date Comments Due Sullivan Park Center (supplement to Sullivan Park Center Final EIS - February 1981) A mixed -use development on a 226 -acre site is being planned in Spokane County. Included are a 79 -acre regional shopping center, 19 acres of other commercial use, 22 acres of business park, 53 acres of industrial park, a 300 -room hotel, and a remaining 43 acres of roadways and open space. The center will be north of Interstate 90 on either side of the Sullivan Road interchange. The site, southeast of the Spo- kane River, occupies portions of sections 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meri- dian. Spring 1986 Hanson Properties, Inc. North 8700 Crestline Spokane, Washington 99207 (509) 467-0770 Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 Wallis D. Hubbard, Planning Director Thomas G. Mosher North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456-2205 County development plan and development standards appro- val or reclassification, Spokane County Health District, DOE and DSHS sewerage system approval; Spokane County Engi- neers' road and storm drainage approvals. Wilsey & Ham 1980 - 112th Avenue NE Bellevue, Washington 98004 (206) 454-3250 June 21, 1985 July 23, 1985 Date of Issue of Addendum September _, 1985 (Final SEIS) Date of Final Action Subsequent Environmental Review Location of Background Materials Cost per Copy Note: October 1985 None anticipated Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260. $1.00 (plus postage, if applicable) Another regional mall (Valley Mall) has been proposed in the general vicinity of the I -90 /Sullivan Road Interchange, on a site lying approximately one - half mile southeast of the Sullivan Park Center. This proposal was granted a zone change in 1979 with the condition that the project commence substan- tial construction by October, 1985, or the site would revert to the previous agricultural zone. A public hearing would be required by October to request an extension of the commercial zoning or a change in this condition. Practical economics would dictate that two competing regional malls cannot feasibly exist in such close proximity considering the characteristics of the projected trade area. Therefore, this SEIS was developed under the assumption that only Sullivan Park Center would be realized on a regional scale, and that the valley Mall proposal would eventually consist of high density commercial or residential activity. Should the Valley Mall proposal become a reality, the Sullivan Park Center would, in all probability, not be constructed and another use would occur on the proposed site - -most likely some combination of light industrial, office and commercial. ii Table of Contents FACT SHEET i COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL EIS AND RESPONSES Comment Letter 1. Spokane County Conservation District 1 2. U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service 4 3. Washington State Department of Ecology 5 4. Washington State Department of Natural Resources 6 5. Washington State Department of Transportation 7 6. Washington State Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation 8 7. Spokane Transit Authority 9 8. City of Spokane Public Works Department 10 RESPONSES 11 STAFF QUESTIONS 12 iii Spokane County Planning Department N. 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 Dear Sir: Spokane County Conservation Dlstrlct North 222 Havana Street - Spokane, Washington 99202 - Telephone (509) 456 -2120 July 1, 1985 SUBJ: Sullivan Park Center DSEIS PE- 1504 -85 ZE- 180 -78 COMMENTS: Reference page 9, Sewage Disposal Alternatives Sincerely, e rettr iegriccat ROBERT SCHMIDT Chairman Under no condition, for any interim period, should on -site disposal be considered at this time or any other time. Location to the River, the groundwater (aquifer), the highly permeable Garrison gravelly loam soils and the size of the project makes on -site disposal unacceptable and should not be listed as any option or temporary alternative. Enclosure: Soil Interpretation /GgA 1 CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF -GOVERNMENT SLr,1TLP FACIL111LS LQNSIEWCI1 PLTLR111 • • 5(NrR( -POnc FILTER .• : GCOD :SEPTIC 1L'!• . II : t9$ORPTIO': : 11 ROADRILL t FIELDS (1 1 ' 11 i SCVEPf-S(EFAGE 11 : PROBABLE SfdtGE I: LL6CC'. :: SAND AREAS :1 • • .- 1 1 1 : 5E :t 1 PROPAHL( SLLITLRY it lt•:Dr:EL 11 GRAVEL 1 EIRE °C °1 :1 1 1 1 SLVERF- SEEPAGE II 1 POOR -SMALL STONES,APCA RECLLIM. I SI';111ff 1 :I 1 LA':CrILL :1 TOPSOIL 1 IARrAI 11 1 11 1 I - - � - -- • PGOR- SCfFAGC,SMALL -TONES_ 11 I DAILY : 11 _ Y1_1L?_M_INILLLLNT COVER FOR 1 11 1 SEVERE - SEEPAGE I LANDFILL 11 POND 1 11 RESERVOIR 1 11 AREA 1 " QILD1NQ_:11L_QLYEL2P.LN :1 • : SEVERE- CUTBANKC CAVE 11 1 SEVERE - SEEPAGE $HILLCif 1 2ICMBANKM(NTS 1 :EXELYATIr':S : :I DIKES AND t • 11 LEVEES 1 • SLISHl 11 2 SEVERE -NO V'ATER CVLLLI':s 1 1: EXCAVATED t WllHrUT 11 PONDS t BASEQEYTC 2IACUIFER FED 1 11 1 SLIGHT 11 1 1 DEEP 70 WATER DVCLLINGS 11 I VII,- 1: DRAINAGE 1 BASEMENTS II 0 11 1 1 SLIGHT II 1 DROUGHTY SMALL 0 I1 I COM•.CPCIAL 1 1 BUILLI'!G: ti IRRIGATION 1 II 1 11 1 1 MDU(PATP -:POST ACTION 11 1 LARGE STONCS,100 SAND LUCAL 1 11 TERRACES 1 PPLCS Lr:C 11 AND I 5TP(E15 11 DIVERSIONS I 11 __1 1 LAWNS, • MOOERAIL -SMALL SIONrs.DRCU6MIY 11 1 LARGE 510NCS,DR000HIT ILANDSCAPIN6 I 11 GRASSED I A':C SELF 1 11 WATERWAYS 1 ',IP.LYS 1 11 1 S'0RANI Crtj,l., WASHI5L10N 5 0 1 1 I N T E R P R E T A T I O N S * L E O N E GO GARRISON GRAVELLY LOAM, 0 TO 5 PERCENT SLOPES uSDA -scs • -P5 GLRPISO'• ¶FRIES CONSISTS 0E V(PY DEEP SOMEWHAT EXCESSIVELY DRAINED SOILS FORMED IN GLACIAL OUTWASH WITH A PANEL( CF vO1CeVIC 421 ANC LOESS (N LEVEL TO GENTLY SLOPING TERRACES. AND STEEP TO MOD(RATCLV STEEP Tr PPACC BREAMS. VEGETATION 1! +AINLV SPASS AND SCATT(O(D STANOS OF TREES. MAP IS 1S TO 25 INCHE51 HAAT I5 47.10 50 F1 FE5 1S 12C 10 370 DATE, 1YPICALI T «250 5DIL5 HAVE A PAPA GRAY/5H BROWN IMWa/AY 44.14 SAY/M/ AAvec Lf 1N. THICK. A BROWN GPAVLILT LOAM sursolt 2/ II+iHL9 ' PLL__ IL EP_ oWi:_YiFI_LPASL11.1_121eI_LQIPSL _Ink —: BSIPIIQP_IQ1L_1dLELIA •1rR1r; 2 L511[IILQ_SQ1L_CfQELE11LL ERACIIP(RCLN1 OF MATERIAL LESS :LIOUIU :(LAS- : III•:.1: l ^El ir:TPPC t UNIFI(0 1 AA5HT0 >S INt_1EIN_]:_EISSINL_LILYL_N4A_ 1 1IP11 I1 ICI7Y: 1 IIELIl1 • 1 12__1_ 1 i1NLi `_ :sP, co 1-4 0-10160-80 r_5 -70 5U -l0 40 -SD 12C•7C :4P -` ;I'- ..;;.c v_SL. (2V -l. 62 -1 :L °. 1 A -2, A -1, 4 0- 15145 -75 40 -70 5 -60 1` -45 2f -; • • ... -r.P: - 1.Pr- L 55 2c - in - 2 C 1 - : (ny_GPV -SL :GB A -1 10 -30140 -60 25- NF , 1 I. , I . • .••1I51 801K: P(PP(A AvAILAPLr SOIL I SALINITY I S SHRINK IOROSIDNIVIND (ORGANIC: • COPRCSIVII, 1II'.,):ItITI: FE NFITY . FILM :WATER CAPACITY 2(1011ONI IMMHOS /CM11 SWILL ILILIDRIIEROD.IMA11(1 I : ' ' QLCI__ 1 _ 115 LPP 1 __ i___ i 1__ 1Et 1__________ 1PQILNII/LLP_1_1_1LE9L'Ei_1PLI1 : 'irLL__ICILLEIlL: 2 - 15:17 - r:' - . 0.f - 2.0 : 0.12 -0.15 16.6 -7.8 1 - LOU 1.171 3 1 - 1 2 -5 :P11 161 : -1`.: - ; 0.2 - 2.0 1 0.09 -0.12 16.6 -7.8 1 - IOW :.151 1 I :aa-•.1 - I >20 : 0.05 -0.0` IA.6 -7.8 1 - LOW 1.10: 1 1 • 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 • ' 1 1 1 1 1 (1:96186 H1 L H _YA 1 LP_I* ELL__ _1_ELM_Lh.ILQ_E!_N_1- _ 1 5QEL1LLNCLJHTYIPCIU•1•L: 1 DEPTH 1 KIND INON1H5 20(PIHINARCNESSI((P11 IPARCN(SS17811. 1T01LL i6P*-: 086(1 1 __Li c ald_'i`' I C!!l1 SEff_1 (rT1 1 1 1(1 1 1 4 1 8 1 1 1 II NI F 1 • 1 L1 '•c'•` 1 1_2LAL 1 1 1 - 1 al? 1 i - t :MrLtPtn ____11 __ 2 Was LARRISON 6RAYCLLY LOAM, 0 TO 5 PERCENT SLOPES 1 nODtP nc -DU51r -- HLLHL /I1QtlIL_QLYLIQCIILta - -- II I SEVERE -SMALL LIONES 1 11 1 CAMP AREAS I IIPLAY6R0UND3 1 II 1 - -1-- ' --_ ∎∎ 1- 1 1 MODrRA1t -DUSTY ""'" "- 11 . 1 MO -DU STY 11 PATHS 1 11 AND I 1 11 TRAILS 1 . — — 1 1 —.1 ------ __________ CleADIL1 II_ LHQ_ I1LLQ5_ ELH_ dLHL-2LLHPei- ag _HISIYHL- 1N1LN_LLYLL_EMIDLHLHll 1 CAPA- I VH(A1 1 1114(414 I BARLEY 1 GRASS- 1 PASTURE I 0A1S 1 BRUT I MINTER 1 SPRING I ILEGUME NAY I I 1 ILP ASS. SEED I —_ 1HY2__- 1-- 11111_-1- 1HY1-- L_ 1I2E11__ _1___1111"_1___1___112111___1___! LE 3! ___ • lNSEll llffa_ 1N3HH1 1HHa1 N HEa1 2 HH_11 Nlff_ 11HHa HH _ 1N2 _ 11 HHa_ 1 Nlff -Ilfia_11EE_ilffa_ ? 3S 3( 30 60 30 60 20 1.0 4.0 2.5 30 1 I ACC I I I I , • PICNIC AR(ASI 1 1 ODD 1 I SYM I 1 I I .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .1 -1 1 I 3 1 , YQQQLANQ_SYIIAHILIII M ANAQLELNI_EP_QHLLec 1 EQILNIfAL_EEQQYLIlIIII_1 EROSION! (OUIP. SEEDLING! WINOTH.1 PLANT t COMMON TREES ISITEI TREES TO PLANT 11NQ /I 101 !PONDEROSA PIN( 1 SLI : MODERATE SLIGHII MODERATE PONOCPOSA PINE • I • f POTENTIAL FROOUCTION :LBS. /AC. DRY 1171: 1 " — - ' 1_ " - - - - ' — FAVORABLE YEARS 2400 1 NORMAL YEARS 2100 1 • RING[ sir: -- io --- ja' / /2�LL_ILA_R._- __1--15121 1 1 FOOTNOTES 1 CVCESSIVE PCRMFARILITY RATE MAY CAUSE POLLUTION OF GROUND WATER. 3 USDA -SC 4 -B YINQHELAHS 1 SECCILS 1NI1-- __SECLICS 1 UI 1 _—___ SELCILS_- _____Atli___ IH1: ITATIPIAN HONCYSUCKLCI6 ISKUNKBUSH SUMAC 16 ILILAC I7 IS IBCR IAI P(ASNR U6 17 : :ROCKY MT. JUNIPER 1111RUSSIAN -OLIN[ 113IGRCCN ASH 11EI518ERIAA CLM ilE: IAUSIRLAN PING 1181PON0(R0$A PINE 121ISCOTCH PINE 1221RLACK LCCUST 12R: I 11 1 I 1 I 1 I I 11 I 1, 1 -- ____1 1 j-j_ 1 1 1 1 • Y- alisI_sulIAH3L1Il 1 _ eQILNIlAL2Qfl_NAHIIAI_CLCNCNIS— -,-I-- _EQILNIjAL_AS_ VCR;__ IGPAIN LIGPASS SI WILD IHARDlD ICONIFCRISHRUBS 11CTLANDISHALLOWIOPCNLD 11100010 111CTLANDIRARCELD: 1 $ LLQ__ 1LLQUtlC _1- 1AB14_1_IECCS_JELANl1_1 1ELANIS_ 1_ YAICE_ IiILQLE- IMILDLE_IYILCLE_IilLCLE_1 FAIR 1 FAIR I GOOD 1 FAIR 1 FAIR 1 FAIR POOR IV. POOP! FAIR 1 FAIR IV. POCRI : I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 — 1_ 1__ 1__ _1— 1_ - --1 1 1 1 1 1 t — _ _ __ - -_— P /D11A1_NA1YL_eIANI_L2M_MYM ITT 4EAt1LLLdNQ_QE_LQHCSI_u NCLESIQBI_YLQLIAIIPN1 I PLANT 1 PrRCEN1AQ1_1QMfg$ITIoN EQEI_kLnntI1 I CD•MCR FLANT NAME SYMBOL I 1 !!DANE fCSC 1-'1 I 1 ' FEID 40 IPLU(PUNCH L•' AGSP 15 1 l$NDV6RU5H CIAI:DIHDS [(V( 10 I ICOMMCV S•:OvE(RPT SYAL :PRAIRIE JUN:GRAS$ KOCR 10 y 1 I 1 (ROUGH FESCUE :CSC 5 ' ILUPINE LUPIN v OSC B I POSA• 5 :OTHER PERENNIAL FORE'S PPFF y 1 j =+ United States ��AM Department of AM • Agriculture Thomas G. Mosher Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Mr. Mosher: The Soil Conservation Service has reviewed your Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Sullivan Park Center. Page 9, "Sewage Disposal Alternatives ": As you have indicated in your report, there is a very real potential for contamination of the aquifer due to the Garrison gravelly loam soils at the site. Therefore, the wording of this paragraph should be revised to reflect that interim on -site disposal is not an acceptable consideration for this project at any time at this location. If you have need for additional information or assistance, please feel free to call our field office located at N. 222 Havana, Spokane, Washington, 99206, telephone 509- 456 -2120. Than you for the opportunity to review your document. Sincerely, State Conservationist T". Sor Con,pv,llon 5•rrsC0 U " an •OonCY 01 the :•Dnrlinonl 01 •nncuttur• • Sod Conservation Service cc: J. Weston, AC, SCS, Spokane AO J. Melton, DC, SCS, Spokane FO 4 Room 360 U.S. Courthouse Spokane, Washington RECEIVED JUL 151985 99201 SPOKANE COUPIIY PLANNING DEPARTMEN July 11, 1985 SCS-AS- 10-79 ANI)RIA 14 AT 1Y RINIAIR Diect.x STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV -11 • Olympia, Washington 9850 -1 -8711 • (2(X.) 459-6000 Mr. Thomas Mosher Spokane County Planning Department N 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99260 Dear Mr. Mosher: BJR:pk cc: Dee Weber, ERO July 16, 1985 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft supplemental environmental impact statement for the Sullivan Park Center proposed by Hanson Properties, Inc. We support the proposed connection of the Sullivan Park Center sewage facilities to Spokane County's Valley Sewer System. We recommend the sponsor coordinate his efforts with other developers along North Sullivan so the installed system can be designed as a permanent component of the Valley Sewer. If you have any questions, please call Mr. Roger Ray of the Eastern Regional Office at (509) 456 -2926. Sincerely, Barbara J. Ritchie Environmental Review Section 5 me I JUL22 1935 SfunANE COu.vir PLANNING DEPARTMEN1 f DATE: July 8, 1985 Department of Natural Resources P. 0. Box 190, Colville, Washington 99114 -0190 BRIAN BOYLE 509 -684 -5201 or 1- 800 - 562 - 6010 Of rw.. Lead. RECEIVED JUL 1 11985 TO: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99260 WW:lm We do not have an interest in the above mentioned project and have no comments on the proposal. following comments: This is adjacent to State owned 1st and 2nd Class Shoreland. cc: Ryder Chronic, Area Manager Ross Resseltine, Arcadia District Manager File 6 Equal Opportunity, Affirmative Action Employer SPOKANE COUWFY PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: Walt Wruble TITLE: Spokane Local Manager ADDRESS: P. 0. Box 190, Colville, WA 99114 -0190 SUBJECT: REVIEW OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT /ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ACTION SPONSOR: Hanson Properties, Inc. PROJECT: Sullivan Park Center Draft EIS X We do have an interest in the above mentioned project and wish to make the • Surface Mining Permit - A surface land mine reclamation permit and reclamation plan shall be required if more than two acres of land is to be disturbed or more than 10,000 yards of mineral is removed in any type of mining operation. (For example, the removal of top soil or any other aggregate type of material to be sold or used for construction off the proposed site.) 1. WANT BEKIN1SON JUL 2 PL /INNIN DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPQRTATION Office of Di■trict Administrator • North 2714 Mayfair Street, Box 5299, North Central Station • Spokane, Washington 99205 -0299 July 23, 1985 Secrriary 1 Wallis D. Hubbard, Plannning Director Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99260 Dear Mr. Hubbard: The District 6 office of the Washington State Department of Transportation has been working with Hanson Properties, Inc. on transportation related issues arising from their proposed Sullivan Park Center. Our concerns for mitigating adverse impacts have been addressed in the draft supplemental environmental impact statement. It is importanVho reemphasize that approval of an additional interchange in the vicinity. of Evergreen Road will require concurrence from the Federal Highway Administration. Concurrence is not assured and will be jeopardized by any design that results in a decrease in mainline capacity of the existing Interstate system. .. We concur with the conceptual approach to improving the transportation network as it relates to the Department of Transportation's interests in this proj t. ruly yours, WRH:so cc: HQ Recorda Control STATE OF WASHINGTON Re: Sullivan Park Center Supplement to Draft EIS ECEIVEE1 WALTER R. HORNING, P.E. District Administrator 7 miens! 3 1ACO8 17K)MAS a,erlor SPOKANE CUUdfY OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVP4- DEPARTMENT 177 West Twenty -first Avenue, KL -77 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -5417 • (X36) 753.4077 Hr. Wallis D. Hubbard, Planning Director Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99260 Dear Hr. Hubbard: A staff review has been mental impact statement. resources are discovered Office of Archaeology Washington. dw STATE Of WASHINGTON July 16, 1985 Log Reference: 670- C -SP -04 Re: Sullivan Park Center DSEIS r G 51(_ re ( 8198 completed of your drift supplemental environ- Ip the event that archaeological or historic during project activities, please notify the and Historic Preservation in Olympia, Sincerely, Robert G. Whitlam, Ph.D. State Archaeologist (206) 753 -4405 R'ECEIVE1) JUL 2 3 i,lb Si ukaii' II.1115ii Atli hut iiv Sul,,• 1;1.1 1 b1 .1..1,• Ihi, 11uild114y, Ni 1111 '1 I .`.111•1.1 Mr. Thomas G. Mosher North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Mr. Mosher: CMF:sja 9 July 23, 1985 Sincerely, Christine M. Fueston Transit Planner Spuknuv, W,nhin);Wn 9J2O1 -0706 (51M)I 4511-1570 RECEIVED JUL 2 3 1985 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT In review of the Sullivan Park Center Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, Spokane Transit Authority has determined that the proposed project will not have an adverse impact on transit provison in the Spokane Valley. Currently, STA provides service along Sullivan Road via the #20 Valley/ Trentwood Feeder route. Service is projected to continue within the area. Spokane Transit Authority looks forward to working with the project sponsers to assure adequate transit provison and passenger amenities to the project site. JUL 2 1985 Wallis D. Hubbard, Planning Director Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99207 Re: Sullivan Park Center — Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Dear Mr. Hubbard, We appreciate the opportunity that you have given us to review the referenced document. At this time we have no comment to make on the subject project document. If we can be of any assistance during the remaining development of the final supplemental to the environmental impact statement please contact our department. GGS /das cc:Public Works File Planning and - Programming RECEIVED p t A JUL 8 JYB!, h � 0 SPOKANE COUNTY - PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10 Sincerely, Brad W. Blegen, P.E. Public Works Director n e, IL SKYWALK LEVEL MUNICIPAL BUILDING PUBLIC / WORKS DEPARTMENT SPOKANE,, WASHINGTON 99201 -3343 / (509) 456 -4300 Responses Comment Letter 1: Comment Letter 2: Comment Letter 3: Spokane County Conservation District U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service Washington State Department of Ecology Response: As indicated on page 9, interim on -site disposal is not under consideration by the sponsor at this time. The sponsor is currently proceeding with planning for a sewer connection in Sullivan Road, and the planning department encourages coordination with other developers and with public works in this regard. The planning department would recommend against any proposal for on -site disposal, but does not anticipate such a request from the sponsor. Comment Letter 4: Washington State Department of Natural Resources Response: Your comment is acknowledged and the sponsor is hereby notified of your surface mining permit requirements. Comment Letter 5: Washington State Department of Transportation Response: Your comment is acknowledged. The sponsor has indicated the intention to continue to work with your office to develop mutually - acceptable network improvements and mitigation measures as the phased development occurs. Comment Letter 6: Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Response: Your comment is acknowledged and the sponsor is hereby notified of your request to be notified if resources are discovered. Comment Letter 7: Comment Letter 8: Response: Your offer of cooperation is acknowledged. Spokane Transit Authority City of Spokane Public Works Department 11 Responses to Doc Hansen's Comments p. 9 in general, office development generates higher traffic volumes for both daily and pm peak hour conditions. For the areas east of Sullivan Road, the comparison is as follows: Scheme One Scheme Two Daily Trip PM Peak Trips (vph) Daily Trip PM Peak Trips (vph) Ends (vpd) In Out Ends (vph) In Out Business Park 1,995 44 329 -- -- Industrial Park 3,505 205 404 4,368 255 503 Total 5,500 249 733 4,368 255 503 p. 16 The following table indicates the comparison between daily traffic estimates among the WSDOT and SRPC studies for the 1 -90 freeway: PROJECTED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (VPD) 12 WSDOT (2002) SRPC (2000) Argonne to Pines 64,000 53,000 Pines to Sullivan 56,000 44,000 Sullivan to Barker 41,000 33,000 Fig. 4 Source of projections on Figure 4 is WSDOT's I -90 Corridor Study, published in draft form August, 1985. Final publication is due in September. p. 22 Population figures for Kootenai County, Idaho in the earlier EIS appear to have been derived from a market study conducted by the original shopping center developer (Edward J. DeBartolo Corporation). Those figures represented a 1985 population projection which was performed before the 1980 census. The latest population projections were obtained from the Kootenai County Engineering /Technical Services division. These figures represent a year 2000 projection based on an actual 1985 population of 63,000 persons. r p. 24 Capture rates observed for regional shopping centers are documented in the January, 1981 issue of the 1TE Journal, in an article entitled, "Reductions in Estimates of Traffic Impacts of Regional Shopping Centers," by Louis Slade and Frederick Gorove. That study documented capture rates ranging from 15 to 45 percent. The minimum value was selected for use at the Sullivan Park Center. p. 32 The proportion of project and through traffic on roadways in the project vicinity varies in each phase and varies according to the alternative mitigation program which is ultimately adopted. In the specific instances of the proposed Evergreen extension and interchange, the proportions of project and through traffic will be developed in a future design report. 13 ERRATA The following are text corrections to the Draft SEIS: Page 8, last paragraph: Interstate 5 should be Interstate 90 Page 11, last paragraph: Existing zoning code should be existing zoning ordinance Page 12, next to last paragraph: (add) A performance bond is required to assure completion of required landscaping. Page 19, Figure 4: (add) Source: WSDOT 1 -90 Corridor Study 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 PROJ. ENGR. 1 DIST. ADM. o 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 s v o ° o o mo g ° o o �i 1 -- 200 VC -- 8 PN STA - 72 +30 �h t.,PH E1EV - 2015.00" i0. - 325 K - 67.57 curvy QX? 108500 DESIGNED BY ENTERED BY CHECKED BY 73.00 7++00 GATE DATE 75+00 76+00 77 +00 REVISION 78+00 79+00 20+00 27+00 w BY \ \ 7 X STATE FED.AID PROJ.NO. r 1 1 4. h 0 m 22 +00 23+00 27 +00 25+00 26100 27 +00 78+00 29+00 30+00 37+00 32+00 33+00 3+ +00 15+00 36 +00 37100 38 +00 FIGURE 1 Preferred Alternative PLAN .69 39+00 y R 4 \\ .' 0 q ■ + SS N ■ A 1 149± Z2.22 1 4 A.P. 149 -x- 2O. ZZ POT S.R 51 - t - GO 39 N P rmFer -4 Se&Vton Corner Fcunc1 brass Cap ■t44 X trt wtanu»,e Case SA-ex SZ +oo I so' L +, sa►k4_ .y Sewer _ SU -35 — FL t�11So 1�9 End 4" _ ....._ Sewer , FL 19 19945S FoVo e_.Sewer- - 51_eev 44. �'._ -..te eac1., side. a� Ex�s„ -,9 �.va o� Sewc,r A.P. S--a. 5c 1- Cog,18 L-- F L. ■9 8S 5 o R..'P. SA-a. So 45 0 , 5 S LA-. L IM / N �. O 9 C) k BM. Brass Moviuw S.E. Cor►-ler- o� �3r�age \`54.°1-<-°- C ou nI'y DaVu" ; [.-Z" °"3-4 .3 1 C IA.y oC 54o a "e - "u Y" Found �.1C. N ail S' 5 4 - +d5.3o A.P. \" \F)- S #a t oo , 7f: E?�d 10" Stwer FL 1� S c E 4 Sewtir, Class 1 e, ?v FL t979 bo � s9c \ \ /57/e)-*** 1_-4” CA ass .I CO . ? V C e.,-� � �Gy Pipes lava bei.wte,i t Z 4 2.. .CGal44 5e, . ISO L ul °�' art 4 SC,wC.h F DL1G�Ik CIas5 SO F4-351 on iotn4 -$ 51 w„r . • Cover , 2.o "1r . l y ■d Oad sp O lc c 5 � w 0 } u u 0 Ci CI ce 0 LEeli 0 - - -a�s�� STA. 24+ 10 LT. & RT. BEGIN PAVEMENT GUTTER TRANSITION TO R.R. X -ING GUTTER ELEV. 63.76 END OF RADIUS CONSTRUCT STD DEPTH PRECAST CONC. DRYWELL 7 O STA. C. & GUTTER ELEV. 64.55 END STD. CURB a c CONSTRUCT STD. 'c_7_ L BICYCLE DROFF TO CURE MEET SPECIAL GUTTER GRADE ELEV. 64.20 III:GUTTER ELEV. 63.70 ZNI), CF RADIUS XONISTRUCT STD. .DETH PRECAST P: NC. DRYWELL STA. 24 +50.88 - E ND STD. CURB & SIDEWALK CONSTRUCT STD. BYCYCLE CURB DROP TO MEET SPECIAL GUTTER GRADE , STA. 25 +30.50 BEGIN STD. CURB BEGIN SIDEWALK w H cr _, 1. m M • ME II _ .. . .., El *JAM altal MINIM TO STA. 25 +90 8" WATER LINE CASING TO BE INSTALLED BY OTHERS STA. 26 + 00 LT. & RT. END STD. CURB. BEGIN INTEGRAL CURB & GUTTER. END PAVEMENT TRANSITION FROM R.R. X -ING NOTE: SOME EXCESS EXCAVATION MATERIAL MAY BE WASTED ON THIS SITE. =HE__ SUITABILITY OF THE MATERIAL & THE EXACT AREA TO BE FILLED IS TO APPROVED & DIRECTED BY THE Eta INEEI SEC. 10 T. 25 N. R.44 E.W. M.T GRADE TO HERE STA. 27+ 50 LT & RT. CONSTRUCT EXTRA DEPTH PRECAST CONC. DRYWELLS COUNTY ROAD PROJECT No. 1479 PINES ROAD F.A.M. PROJ..N °• 4715(1) 0 z 26 PLATE 1, PLAN - PROFILE KEUFFEi & ESSER CO. 48 7024 MADE IN U. S. A. MI Wil MIE.M•lii liffl :7..7-4 num _ wil. Eftc• ____E i EN M • M I 9 M • II 0 _ 4 e M El In w 0 } u u 0 Ci CI ce 0 LEeli 0 - - -a�s�� STA. 24+ 10 LT. & RT. BEGIN PAVEMENT GUTTER TRANSITION TO R.R. X -ING GUTTER ELEV. 63.76 END OF RADIUS CONSTRUCT STD DEPTH PRECAST CONC. DRYWELL 7 O STA. C. & GUTTER ELEV. 64.55 END STD. CURB a c CONSTRUCT STD. 'c_7_ L BICYCLE DROFF TO CURE MEET SPECIAL GUTTER GRADE ELEV. 64.20 III:GUTTER ELEV. 63.70 ZNI), CF RADIUS XONISTRUCT STD. .DETH PRECAST P: NC. DRYWELL STA. 24 +50.88 - E ND STD. CURB & SIDEWALK CONSTRUCT STD. BYCYCLE CURB DROP TO MEET SPECIAL GUTTER GRADE , STA. 25 +30.50 BEGIN STD. CURB BEGIN SIDEWALK w H cr _, 1. m M • ME II _ .. . .., El *JAM altal MINIM TO STA. 25 +90 8" WATER LINE CASING TO BE INSTALLED BY OTHERS STA. 26 + 00 LT. & RT. END STD. CURB. BEGIN INTEGRAL CURB & GUTTER. END PAVEMENT TRANSITION FROM R.R. X -ING NOTE: SOME EXCESS EXCAVATION MATERIAL MAY BE WASTED ON THIS SITE. =HE__ SUITABILITY OF THE MATERIAL & THE EXACT AREA TO BE FILLED IS TO APPROVED & DIRECTED BY THE Eta INEEI SEC. 10 T. 25 N. R.44 E.W. M.T GRADE TO HERE STA. 27+ 50 LT & RT. CONSTRUCT EXTRA DEPTH PRECAST CONC. DRYWELLS COUNTY ROAD PROJECT No. 1479 PINES ROAD F.A.M. PROJ..N °• 4715(1) 0 z 26 PLATE 1, PLAN - PROFILE KEUFFEi & ESSER CO. 48 7024 MADE IN U. S. A. r CENTERL PROFILE B.M. ELEV. 1964.66 "+" ON S.W. COR. OF R.R. LIGHT SIGNAL STAND AT NORTH EAST CORNER OF PINES & INDIANA . ' ).< ' < k CD' AcKLL E> P EL_ c,,L4 INLET c.c) 8' 2U1S 4.5KETE.I. LEGEND EX/STING CURB CONSTRUCT CURB CONSTRUCT DRYWELL . .•.•.•...•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•. • C.c7N1 8" ccD N 1.1E_C_701 Gu E_R. INLET - rc) WELL D N N c - r Alq A -J s Lo4= B.M. ELEV. 1970.56 SPIKE IN TELEGRAPH POLE 69' LT OF STA. 12-1-30 C ( c-CDN ■ CD NS - TD ‘3"F_ Po LA s - v ANc.f\zt:) N c ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 294 INDIANA AVE. OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY WASH. SURVEYED APPROVED SCALE HOR. VERY 15' SHEET 4 OF /0 SHEETS . ... . .... . . . . . . . . . COUNTY ENGINEER CENT PROF/ 0 >- aa r f 0+00 / 2 3 4 5 48 7024 MAIM IN S A 7 L F PLATE 1 PLAN-PROFILE r KEUFFEL & ESSER CO. /0+00 /2+00 L_ TOP OF CURB LT.1 1965 /975 RLINE E /970 /975 TOP OF CURB RT /970 w TOP OF CURB LT. CENTERL PROFILE 1965 TOP OF CURB RT. 1965 24 +00 30+00 34+00 1970 TOP OF CURB LT. 1965 CENTERLINE PROFILE 1965 0 r 0 O 0 0 v x 0 O C 0 O z 0 Z • - 7 A. c.oNS1'R . . DEPT \-1 : /WE ti/1 14 GUTtE.. lWLE7 GONNEGZ W CT 8" SBEta 6,ASKE7 GO N G.. SEW E.g. P\ 0 E S Z'1 } 00 L - r. cGON ;r t . Su MP 4'X l 0' SPEGI BAGKRIL�.. SEC. /0 T. 25 N. R. 44 E. V M. ASSESSOR'S PLAT NO.6 LEGEND _ = =_ == EXISTING CURB CONSTRUCT CURB CONSTRUCT DRYWELL KT PLATE 1, PLAN- PROFILE �lr KEUFFEC & ESSER CO. 48 7024 thAUE I!. U. S A. STP . N ST>z . SU M 1J <1' X g' x \ b' 2 D G .�. c: SPECIAL @AC KFt LL cbNST2. \A/ ELL W i T \-1 GuT'TEl INLET GC>NNE.GT \.Jt TN 8" e.U$33E.1 . G,ASKEZE� GONG. SFW�R t�IPE B.M. ELEV. 1971.55 SPIKE IN TELEGRAPH POLE 7/' LT. OF STA. 33157 GoNS T OhI NOT c \ tEcK \h/ \- u OW ON S17 E ��1E- L- OPMEN�S Fc) DQOPS X02 D21�/�W�ti APP .CD ■O'T \ g \ �E`= \ NO'TV:: - ro c.oNz� Ac G.p N i\\EG.'T 101\\ S - (O c_,C) TE t _ \VE.WAYS S QE 1 - As Or zN \\ sTAN0N . P GC) 1N\ TE �R \y>r� N o G T N:=1 PE - FROM GrLI T 12 INLET TO ply\ I LL 0 N. NO 1_E: S T-\ AN A 3% SLOPE . E» c.O\\&G. GON NEGTO( Z ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 294 INDIANA AVE . OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY WASH. SURVEYED : *? * .. . ... APPROVED SCALE HOR. VERT. l =5' SHEET 6 OF l0 SHEETS COUNTY ENGINEER 1970 TOP OF CURB RT. 1965 L) z 6 z 0 LJ r- ‹ 0 1975 1975 LCENTER PROFILE /970 1975 TOP OF CURB R7: /970 12+00 /6 . SL1 CAP 4 >e 8 X \ . OF. SP, Al-- 0. SP...GAF I 13 INE pJ 14 /5 /5 •S g•S. \ C_,c) • \ ' Ne-1 I-Cr N Flap.\-As /6 SEC. /0 T 25 NR. 44 E.VVM. ASSESSOR'S PLAT NO. 6 lomos•••• S*7 • 4, C) CAP 4' X z.c) CD F \ \ LEGEND EXISTING CURB CONSTRUCT CURB CONSTRUCT DRYWELL YIP /7 -t 14 /8 PLATE 1, PLAN-PROFILE KEUFFEL & ES5ER CO. 48 7024 tilt% Lfl fl u S A • N ON Tat\ c_. A L Tc . G. 0 1 CE..7 1 NJ /./A."•/ E. F kAE.. " GC) INIC.Jk.E.. \ ././ ", U E % /9 ° - = . = 308- = kc). /3 B.M. ELEV 1971.49 SPIKE IN TELEGRAPH POLE 70' LT. OF STA. 23+08 20+00 N 0 G._cDN QNc. 1st EC PE o N c:57 7 \--VAN ts, % — 21 . . I N LET \LE.C.:1" 6 : . ? 4, ZKE. - TE-D • S.vkiE..t — c>. 4 c) 22 N07 t 44E.G \ C)W N E N \ /2 re) AJ P 23 • • , • LJti 41 x8')‹ to. c • '1,=•__c k\ SCALE HOR. VERY 11.5' SHEET 5 OF 10 SHEETS --k-o. WO. • 24+00 L _ SURVEYED . APPROVED . ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 294 INDIANA AVE OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY WASH. .... . . . . . COUNTY ENGINEER 1970 CENTARLINE PROFI1 E 1965 1970 OP OF CURB LT 1965 1970 TOP OF CURB RT., 1965 CUR A © 111111111111© 336.14 661.36 0.06/Ft. P I. STATION A SW 6 +30.00 IgailaMIN 1500' 3 W 12 - +83. - 2 MrfillOglirliCIMEEINIIIIIiIZZIOIROCLEIDLIMILI c .MM.. 24° 57'50"Lt 1500' `IOUMMEMILI . • 332.0• 653.55 =MO W 1 +00.00 WN 6 +58.48 3 I 8 +2.7. 5 7' (i. 00 R. 1000' _ ] • • 1000' _ 66 42.1111110212011131M11 stip. Bridge Rema ve Existing Guard Rai/ I �� N - °3fa_15 "E - I� ii i -- t e e " n _ ;- - /uii / /i/ iii r / /r //r/ /i/� / //inian //� /iii / i_ . /iiiii ' ri// /rrnr//nniiLrl � __ -- 12 13c, -, -_ E:2. l3,t'I�n Df �. \yCl \ SW � F /j /� SW I1 +8498 P.0 SW 12. +83 5R -90 N 85° 57' 55" E N 88° 34'E R/ SW RAMP Exist 18" Conc.. Pipe��i Remove Exist Beam Guard Rail I i I � I li 1 - - 87' 12' 1.5"E WN 0 +50.98 PC c� 6S \•� c.ND PINE NORTH'S' PN 1 +70.2.2`P O.T= PS 13+ •.0 ( •\ t. N I WI 0 +39.0 P.O. �\ � I xist Tcl. PN 10 +97.33 A.P. INDIANA +!r Face 9E'14 SE /-1- 5¢c9 GUARD RAIL DETAIL NO.1 NE V4 S I /4 Sec 9 5TA.4 +12.04 P. 0.T. BEG. OF INDIANA ROAD d to I �,..... - earn/ Guard Rai/ Type / connect fo exisfiny and fasten to Bridge TZ5 N., R.-44E.WM. 100 0 100 5 calm i n Feet 200 N H 5R-90 296+ 16.83 POT.a P 5 10+00.00R 0.77 „ (Exist Over - Crossing) Existing Bridge Pier Bridge Pier to be Cons/ructed • GUARD RAIL. DETAIL NO. 2 STA 9- @6,p P. at END OF INDIANA ROAD BN Tracks ppr STA. 15.. 15.0 4 ND OF PINES ROAD ' �/ n , !"'" , PS 15 +15.0 P.O.T. r - 10.00.0 P.O.T. � Match Ezis +in• Pins Road ' 51.0 I }00.00 PI BEGIN WN See Guard Rail Detail No. I See Guard Rail Detail No. 2. See Sheets No. 20 Thru 22 for Pines Road Layout SR -90 296 *66.83 P.O.T. PN 10 +01.08 P.O.T. Oyer- Crossing to be Constructed Beam Guard ,ear/ Type 1 (connect to existing.) I _ SI Tracks WN 1 +4712 PT 4 ' - Remove ex/ .sting Guard ,Par/ RE 4,aN NO ST,C .k•, A•C .aa ♦Ha, al:. •. • , N,E• 10 T WASH 1•90 (113) 285 1 8 •C 7 ] N W 1 /4. SW '/A S c.c. 10 Exist. 8" Water Main \ WN 3 +2.6.44 PC CONTRACT NUMBER 1/ RAMP � SW '/4 SW 'A Sec 10 End 8" Pipe Relocation PLAN SR 90 MP 289.35 TO MP 290.34 PINES ROAD INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON W. A. BULLET DIRECTOR OF HIGHWAYS Begin 8" Pipe $ Existing Air Relocation Relief Valve 300 '1-, iv 0 '' \-- a) y O 0 0) a N APPROVED June 10, 1577 SHEET 18 OF 71 SHEETS 12" 12" 12" R A I 1,2,3,4,6, 7,8,9 13,14,16 & 17 (Programmed) SIGNAL HEAD LENSES 12" 12" 12" PN_, L I N E I A I lal 10 & 15 (Programmed! ¢C +¢D 0A +¢C H ¢A +¢ 1f 5 1 Programmed 1 DETECTOR 1 PHASING DIAGRAM 18,19, 20,21, 22 & 23 1 Programmed! DONT WALK WALK 1 12" / / zz u r u r• h� w r• •r • Nx a r♦ a n r� �r • a� a� : a r 1/4 \W / T. 25 N., R.44 E.W.M. STA. 13 ±70.00 PS LINE= STA. 14 +29.58 SW RAMP= STA. 0 +00.00 WN RAMP 10 0 10 SCALE DETECTOR 9 DETECTOR 10 DETECTOR 11 STA. 13 +70.00 PS LINE (39'LT.)= STA. 13 +70.22 PN LINE = STA. 0 +39.00 WN RAMP NOTE: • Luminaire No's.14 & 15 wiring is included in the illumination portion of this project. 20 STA.15 + 15 00 PS LINE= STA.10 + 00.00 INDIANA "W"=\ STA. 0 +00.00 INDIANA "E" 1 10 ROAD (NORTH) i NT EkCHA MG 15' 15' w w C o 17' 1 A 1 ROAD 25' ■ E U w 15 1 " 4 3 v \` > DETECTOR 16 roJ REGION NO. 10 STATE WASH. FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. t-90 -6 (443) 285 SHEET NO. 40 0471 DETECTOR 15 DETECTOR 14 C. C. PINES ROAD NORTH SIGNAL SYSTEM N c y SR 90 MP 289.35 TO MP 290.34 PINES ROAD INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION SPOKANE COUNTY (Al WASHINGTON STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON W. A. BULLEY DIRECTOR OF HIGHWAYS APPROVED .tune: 10, 1977 CONTRACT NUMBER SHEET 40 OF /1 SHEE75 DISHMAN \ BEGINNING OF PLAN ACCESS NOTES: TYPE D APPROACH IS AN OFF AND ON APPROACH IN LEGAL MANNER, FOR SPECIAL. ' PURPOSE AND WIDTH TO BE AGREED UPON. IT, MAY BE SPECIFIED AT A POINT TO BE SATISFACTORY TO THE STATE AT OR BETWEEN DESIGNATED HIGHWAY STATIONS. LEGEND PROPERTY LINES ACCESS TO SE PROHIBITED MOWN 711115 � 1 0 200 400 SCALE IN FEET CURVE DATA P.I. STATION DELTA RADIUS TANGENT LENGTH NS -W 86 +19.02 7'56'22" 2864.79 198.80 396.97 NS -W 97 +42.90 13'30'02" 1145.92 135.63 270.01 W- NS 86 +10.61 8'26'36" 2864.79 211.46 422.16 W- NS 93 +53.49 13'55'00" 1149.92 140.34 279.31 E -NS 108 +84.85 13'14'59" 2864.79 332.73 662.48 NS -E 103 +13.17 2V08'03 1145.92 213.77 422.69 NS -E 111+00.56 17'59' 15' 2864.79 453.42 899.38 EVER 14 +60.48 54'00'00" 498.22 253.86 469.56 EVER 21+21.00 21'54'57" 716.20 138.67 273.95 EVER 32 +47.34 36'30'00" 716.20 236.17 456.25 CONN 14 +14.29 78'35'31" 302.00 247.15 414 I t SW 1 /4, SW '/4, SECTION 11 R/W AND TO BE RELINQ TO R /W, L/A AND CONST SPOKANE COUNTY / BY OTHERS ,-∎ - SE 1 /4, SE ' /4, SECTION 10 NE '4, NE '/4, SECTION 15 E 18+ 11.71 MISSION AVENUE UNDERCROSSING RA, HANSON CO. I E 34.2.54 LT' E 34.71.69 RT. . NAME STATION ON ROADWAY ACCESS APPROACH SCHEDULE ENO OF MODIFIED ' CONTROL _ // - E 38 +42_58 P.O.T,/ 1RW AND LATO BE RELINQUISHED TO SPOKANE COUNTY R /W,L /A AND CONSTRUCTION T. 25 N. R. 44 E. W.M. INDIANA & EVERGREEN INTERSECTION CONSTRUCTION BY OTHERS MISSION & MISSION I C 17 +23.67 P.O.T._ CONNECTOR INTERSECTION 1M 10 +00 1 �l NW '4, NW ' / SECTION 14 EVERGREEN & MISSION E 12 +24.93 P.O.C CONNECTOR INTERSECTION C 10 +00 TOTAL LENGTH OF PLAN = 0.66 MILE A AVE. MODIFIED CONTROL FULL CONTROL 71.59 P.O.T. EVERGREEN ROAD UNDERCROSSING w uv 1 EVERGREEN ROAD INTERCHANGE SE '/4, SW 1/4. SECTION 11 E 33.77.64 E 26 +68.32 P.O.T. 358 +38.52 P.O.T. EXISTING LANDSCA I NW 1 / 4 , SECTION 14 SR 90 MP 290.69 TO MP 291.35 - EVERGREEN ROAD INTERCHANGE VICINITY SPOKANE COUNTY ACCESS FEARING PLAN FULL CONTROL STATION 340.00 TO STATION 375.00 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON DUANE SERENTSON SECRETARY lows* Nov. e, Me4 1 a RI 1a 11 161[i LI E).D.1 iY ;•A IL iRV%it qt.'fl∎N't 1sT;. kg.!_ t.4:;1%':;71,1 2 z m co • CLC Associates, Inc. 44 Planning • Engineering • Land Surveying Architecture • Landscape Architecture • 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844 ----------- S. **N "NS-Ww RAMP --- Co UNI .....ct PAC Fl C RA 1 4 •NO......0:;:...0 IC 1•••■•■••••■ ol.......• ............ ......... ...V... ••••••■■••■ ......... ......... ..." .......... -----.0--------4. -------- ," (FORMER23!1.R__NA 014 VtA \-34N" INDIANA , AVENUE ,,,, -- WIN 0.0. -- --- ....... ▪ 1:3 Fr r- 1 ' 1-1 -L-L. 2_ --- , -\ .-. .. ,-, —J 4 /1/ - " /c r -41 ,4/ p 4,4 7 , Op C4) viz,i? 1 2 N TRACT "B" V 4 N N N : X 7 / S / (9 TRACT "'" 4 1 "....4 •••••■■... •• / I VS4 _ /13 ....._ -, ---- ---._ ---__ .., ----------- ■■• __OLD IND .••••". _... AAS N N N •••••••■■. ••••■.. r ••■•■• ••■■■... 1054' •••••••"" 1 L_--- •••••■.. 25 UNI 2 #48 — ■7 Csi DI A t■ I I I I VrIL. LA Lill \ 2 I I C. I L,F11 F)ARCEL %/AI vr1.L.1._ -‘.. 175' IAA! I p _SR) - FINAL PLAT OF SULLIVAN PARK dENTER' 0 4-- ------- m _p t INDIANA Ii 575 FORMER S 6.-KA COEU R E S Ii 7 T1) A Ps" / UN PLATTED N T rI N • ---------- ___ ---------- — C RAILROAD (FORMERLY SPOKANE INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY) ----------- co _ AVENUE .P.,. ,— ■■•■••••••• _ _co 90 z m • • SHEET 1 OF 2 Nh Nh SPONSOR 0 /2• I I _ 1 I MATCH UNE • SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 HANSON INDUSTRIES — BOB BOYLE 15102 E. INDIANA AVE. SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99216 PHONE: (509) 992-5252 jr MATCH UNE SEE SHEET 2 ENGINEER/SURVEYOR CLC ASSOCIATES, INC — PATRICK J. MOORE 707 W. 7TH AVE. STE 200 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99204 PHONE: (509) 458-6840 GRAPHIC SCALE 200 0 100 200 OF 2 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 200 ft. o ullfifflim/MMifififiaillilMilifififii ' CK tj. ------ ---- '///milatammumwmilminimint 400 RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNTY OCT 0 20U0 DIVISION OF PLANNING REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT OF HANSON CENTER EAST LOCATED IN SECTIONS 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, T.25N., R.44 E.W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 0 ..••■••• MATICH UNE SEE SHEET 1 OF 2 0,0CLC Associates, Inc. .,., Plann • Engineering � /� Architecture • Landscape 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 • Land Surveying Architecture (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 MATCH UNE SEE SHEET 1 OF 2 J • i; i 1, T o 1 J ---20 -- _ _ ' • Q�'�-\- _ __ 2> -, t q OF 3 F) `-- Rk CEN slit, ki kit/AN _ -r- i ? N } VICINITY MAP RIVER • • • ••••• SPONSaR HANSON IND JSTRIES — BOB BOYLE 15102 E. IN IANA AVE. SPOKANE, W, 99216 PHONE: (50) 992 -5252 ENGINEER /SURVEYOR CLC ASSOCIATES, INC — PATRICK J. MOORE 707 W. 7TH : AVE. STE 200 SPOKANE, WE SHINGTON 99204 PHONE: (509 458 -6840 i_ A /" / t\ I ' /1 L�n_uly .� A r. ITI n I Tl /• E) t.I A ( ) r-C' r'\VLJI 11■JIv I / \71 \L- I_-t \ L_ 2 80 FORMER eURLi 34s �TpN NCRj�E _ •f;f�tAC� X09' ER-O AP - WA � 9 _ 90 v / SHEET 2 OF 2 15 UNPLATTED r -' �l 1 16 49 1582' 200 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 100 200 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 200 ft. 6 0 400 RECEIVE SPOKANE COUNTY OCT 0 9 2000 DI VISION OF PLANNING REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT a HANSON CENTER EAST ! ' I LOCATED IN SECTIONS 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, T.25N., R.44 E.W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON U) CD SEC. 10, T. 25 N., R. 44 E.W.M. Mon Jan 05 09: 03: 50 998 DRYWELL TYPE AND LOCATION CALL BEFORE YOU DIG _ 8000 CURB CUT AND SWALE BERM FACE OF CURB CURVE I RADIUS I LENGTH I TANGENT I DELTA I STATION -PC I OFFSET -PC I STATION -PT I OFFSET -PT DRYWELL METAL FRAME METAL GRATE STATION OFFSET TOP GRATE C113 7.00' 21.99' 180'00'00" 69 +07.00 7.00 L 69 +07.00 7.00 R NORTH CURB SOUTH CURB DW #27 TYPE A TYPE 4 TYPE 4 75 +90 40' L 1978.19 C114 68.00' 30.07' 15.29' 25'20'19" 69 +50.00 7.00 R 69 +79.09 0.74 R STATION WIDTH DEPTH I.E. BERM STATION WIDTH DEPTH I.E. BERM DW #28 TYPE A TYPE 4 TYPE 4 75 +90 40' R 1978.21 69 +00 3' 7" 1970.69 YES C115 68.00' 27.54' 13.96' 23 69 +79.09 0.74 R 70 +05.87 5.00 L 69 +00 70 +00 71+00 3' 3' 3' 7" 7" 7" 1970.69 1972.60 1975.57 YES YES 70 +00 3' 7" 1972.61 YES C116 1.00' 3.14' 180 72 +62.53 7.00 L 72 +62.53 5.00 L ONE CALL NUMBER 48 HR. NOTICE REQUIRED YES 71+00 3' 7" 1975.44 YES � INDIANA AVENUE STA: 73 +00 16' 12' 8' 12' 16' CURVE A 0 = 09 °39'17" R = 447.80- STA: 75 +52.06 C117 30.00' 40.80' 24.26' 77'55'13" 72 +36.51 34.50 L 72 +64.75 58.50 L 72 +00 3' 7" 1978.60 NO 72 +00 3' 7" 1978.35 YES C118 4.00' 12.57' 180'00'00" 73 +04.23 51.59 L 73 +11.68 50.29 L 73 +00 3' 7" 1980.23 YES • :0.83 3 "W I 09 C119 40.00 55.22' 33.03' 79'05'36" 73 +46.26 91.49 L 73 +83.72 46.50 L 74 +00 3' 7" 1980.04 YES YES T = 37.82 L = 7546' OFFSET: 34.50 L . STA: 73 +46.26 STA: 75 +02.76 C120 54.16' 35.51' 18.42' 37'33'49" 73 +36.14 66.05 L 73 +56.47 38.22 L 75 +00 3' 7" 1978.82 C121 4.50' 12.08' 19.35' 153'49'04" 73 +27.77 65.34 L 73 +36.14 66.05 L 75 +85.96 3' 7" 1978.34 NO 75 +85.96 3' 7" 1978.34 NO STA: 0 +00 MIRABEAU POINT DRIVE 1980.56 _ � C122 2.00 3.52 2.42' 100'50'53" 73 +23.35 35.39 L 73 +25.36 33.09 L 77 +00 3' 7" 1978.72 YFS YFS 77 +00 3' 7" 1978.72 YES / OFFSET: 91.49 L OFFSET: 46.50 L ER 1981.44 C123 2.00' 4.99' 5.96' 142'53'52" 73 +55.49 34.56 L 73 +56.47 38.22 L 78 +00 3' 7" 1979.12 78 +00 3' 7" 1979.12 YFS YES C124 7.00' 21.99' 180 °00'00" 73 +60.50 7.00 L 73 +60.50 7.00 R 79 +00 3' 7" 1979.52 YES 79 +00 3' 7" 1979.52 1981.28 1981.54 UNION PACIFIC] RAILROAD Edge of Right of Way 80 +00 3' 3' ® 3' 3' 7" 7" 7" ® 7" 1979.92 1980.32 1980.72 1980.63 YES YES YFS 80 +00 81 +00 3' 3' 7" 1979.92 7" 1980.32 YES 981 MP 1981.00 Top Rail Top Rail c CV 1 0,00 : � � � I � � 1 � � I 1 � � • � � in �rl�R 81 +00 82 +00 83 +00 To Rail , p f�ii►ri� � �� I � � � 82 +00 83 +00 3' 3' 7" 1980.72 ®1980.63 7" 1980.07 STA: 72 +64.75 STA: 73 +83.72 + OFFSET: 58.50 L • : II . 'I,, ' PT = 0 0 6 OFFSET: 46.50 L 84 +00 1980.07 84 +00 3' . DW #27 1 ��r 21111k i ER 1980.65 85 +00 3' 7" 1979.49 85 +00 3' 7' 1979.49 ! "208' SwaIC - Construction Limits - , ''l 1 I �.. I .�. .. E- 1. .�, .• I• �- I - <-- • I _' =,> � _ MP 1980.09 - 77 +00 78 +00 79 +00 80 +00 81 +00 82 +00 83 +00 84 +00 in )C123_� Centerline Road STA: 72 +36.51 85 +00 c.i n OFFSET: 34.50 L - �'00, � 122 75 +00 76 +00 10' Drainage Easement C E 1 979.74 / R = 1500.00' T= 246.96' ok / / • _. ..-- ----T- -' -F I- - I i I - -f-- - I - I -f• I - - - I .. ` „F-- - -f-- - I 6..: L = 489.52' / -- C1' 6 / 7 00 Crown Line i - Centerline of "208" Swale P- / o C _.-- -- -•- ' o - '`_ t� _ o Edge of Right of Way + /� � „�, /�� ..-� ..•- ^ i f .•'. : ,,• ----- -- .- i - --- .� -- ,-- J - - _ . -- ___ . J = �_ - p • Drivewa Curb D ro• tem•orar ''•" T ;n 111111111111111` � � + co 0.) cn O rn c3 �, DW #28 STA: 0 +53.42 OFF Construction s - E ro nstr Limits \\ � � .ET: 40.09 L Centerline of "208" Swale 0.24 9: Driveway Curb Drop tem ary) r ELEVATIONS EDGE Sta. 84 +45 to 84 +75 Rt. 70A.00 t'' •- ,:...> ..... --- --" .P J _ �. ----- �- G ------ --"" o o Sta. 73 +25 to 73 +55 Rt. Cn cn cf! -- ` - -•�" 0 i o to be removed by developer + � }O O c;\'\ � % � / i� Centerline Road N as property develops N 69 N 0 J l _,--` ` - = / A = 17'31' 1500.00' 05" 73 +40 Flexible Guide Post Type W 3 J _ g - _ - / R 3' - - " % / ' I 1:1 O OF PAVEMENT 31' Sidewalk, Draina e & Utilit Easement to be ; removed by developer g y g L O ii i as property develops' al 1980.27 Pavt. Type © 1980.45 Pavt. 84+60 Flexible Guide Post T e W D _ m D o , Edge Right Way N © 1980.41 Pavt. of of O +00 1980.35 Pavt. ►v Q 1980.17 Pavt. CROWN � • • • = 231.11' / ■JO OO ■I �_1 r. / -� � ►, Edge of �ht Top Typical Top of Curb Gutterlline _ L = 458.62 �' ..------ / 31' Sidewalk, Drainage (Sc Utility Easement i� :.: L "' . . ' ;a a., -• . <:,.. '`;`;• "' +.,. ;' `.' '-c'i =, 'r. ` ,:r -` : .., 7 r' " " -' T , . ,�:;:.,. .:;r•.l ... r �;' ' y 0 - 00 0 1979.36 Pavt. 6' 2' 16' 12' 12' 4' 4' 12' 16' 2' 6' H ,� f� ` q11� � © `1 I \ \ 11 � t• E, '♦�� 0 1979.71 Pavt. n? Q 1979.86 2 • , '208" Swale . ;i:f , ` ' '> :l ' ' " -4 0 1980.88 Pavt. o'. iD 1980.77 Pavt. / of �� Face of Curb-/' Face TYPICAL oi�Way 0 1980.42 Pavt. 2% 0 1980.70 2% Pavt. - -� 2.5' 2.5' _ >....., ��_ 1980.65 Pavt. it.,.... .... 1980.60 Pavt. STA: 0 +98.04 6 1981 Pavt. • 198.62 Pavt. Berm 1 1.5' PLAN VIEW : SWALE INLET Flow Dir =ction i� ` o - 1.5' 0� 3' 3.. 54' �_, 3.3' .� " Q' OFFSET: R1981.44.50 R ,� 1980.42 Pavt. 1980.40 Pavt. MIRABEAU POINT DRIVE 1985 RABEAU �30'VC POINT DRIVE GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) 0 100 E• pg S � 25 50 ::'. '- • � To. o f Berm , .<, °�'1 ..'' `6.� I og ,`, ' i � jy ,3. 1 . ��!r, 3 ' ilr ►y 3'• y\ 3; CROWN L I 'any o' w z UMOJ3 £' C 0 +75 89 ��\� 8£ +1 L l'4 1 50' ' S r , = II•I E ., %:' NOTE: Rough grade to be established from edge of Indiana Avenue to South Railroad Right of Way. BM BRASS CAP 99 8 99TTEE�n``"" TOP OF WINGWALL • Surfacing and paving will be between g Indiana Ave. Ave• SE CORNER OF S ROFILE SCALE ANAL S ULLIVAN ROAD BRIDGE . ELEV = 1986 HORIZONTAL: 1 " =50' Swale Bottom 1.1' below Top of Curb NOTE 1. Reverse 2. Delete berm 3. Seed Swale T %1� %�<.�::� .�!.�ex: - •' ..' o ' �� o FRONT VIEW : SWALE INLET for flow in direction. . x �/�'x ''.,x' .. . ,v. • -.�� ' . SIDE VIEW SWALE INLET 1980 uolpui �! 0 b dy 861 •92% 0 a w rn .- 0 ^' 0.0 detail opposite at low points. TYPICAL ,•�, -�-. CURB SWALE ! n► � n i�i-rco�in and Berm with Grass. See Note #1 sheet 7 of 17 B3 CUT AND _E BE T 100 FT. o o + o +0 OA€ w ?' 69'0861 ,? ` +1 0 OA3 8 6 Raised channelization installed in con i „ , !EXPIRES 07/17/99 Mirabeau later date. VERTICAL : 1= 5 C extension of at a 0 +00 1+00 K.) v g of M a M ai 00 ... 50' 111 Existing Ground VC 82 +; 09'18 -I MEM ;9'011 - tZL 213 X ti + ;'L 2!3 ' I I An 1'096.1 AD( 0 I £ L'6L6 ., , �_� 06'9€ l P4' 96'9L 62'8L6 EVC 76+ +0.40% I :'VC 82 I 0£' L261 T__ ��■�. 1980 1980 981.21 •,ln TOP • _ • I .1 A (♦ • 1 05 O. A 1 OF CURB LEFT 1975 50' V.C. ----' 1975 CU - . 9L +6 • A8 tO L8'£\ +0L 3 • •' 09+ L OA8 l _L 19 'LL6 L i� ' • .. .. 300' .. .. U7301 3 LZ'08E L n 96'6L61 ,nod 9 f'9L6 L 99'09 +9L OAb Ell 100' V.C. • r 1 9 Z 6L MINIM Ell �� II 111 °o III ■ MEM 09 Nal 111111 o - 0.5890 111 EMI Mil TOP OF - Z 1 00 +OL 'IVC 73 .-00 982.12 Pav't. 982.62 TC . �� L 1970 ., v.C. P4 S 50' Top of Pcvement Z9 OAld 1981.80 L61 Aid G6 ;9'01- ' Ill :L61 0• +LL 3A8 LJ .4 91 • � I Ir-Tr -- 1II 100' '1.1• '0861 iiiii 3 00' V.C. 11111 I aav L L19 £L dH . ?poi: 2:096 L OMNI. I 1_= ��. in ■�_ ( ' 4 N N },AI - ., Al 99'6L6 11Aod t I i+Z'6L61 ILa! 6L'6L6L I 1979.241 I-9L 3AS +0.40% 1980 Existing Ground -- ■ Z8 0A8 T4.z9 0A8 09126 �� • V.C. LT1.961 I III MI •£8 3A3 I 00 OA. =ME III - 0.5890 TOP c OF CURB CRO El 4y .. 7 1980 RIGHT 1975 21' _ �, 9L +69 O. 50' V.C. U - ... _ _ j 9 . 1vL6 1 +l Z6'£ • d Z•6'£ Or) 110+0L 1 9•P'£ 6 L .--- 9Z +OL 3A3 _ -�' k29. ° . 3 — O1 L0 +69L I I 1, OZZL6L ' ,A•d 0L' LL ,„,,,, IIIIIIII 1980.0,1 ( 1980.29 P4 11111111111 nu _ 1111111.1 III �a yc �u - ryL anp I � j 9-Frfri. 3A3 C 9-WL 0A3 _ lilt F ((� Y1 UL U". 99'09 3AId 1975 1981.30 4 f104 7 III IJVI•VL r 1981.21 I Ground all CROW E co " `. L•6' L6 09+ L 3A8 • ■■ 111 • • . 11111 ■a■■■ __ I �� ... E 1970 iri - .11111 00 +£L OAId VCO ' 0M. in•nn.• ....�� 69'196L I ••••7• V.C. o 50' ;+Z8 OA d 09• use .6I. .6L Aid IN, ' ' co 9L '8L6 L •- 96'8Lt31 P1�+ 99'09 +9L OAI 1 196'99 +9L di L6'9L61 I I ;9 +9L 3A3 III - + - imimiiiii Existing • m 9L +6£ OA8 III I 198M' CUR: RT � ' 100' V.C. 1975 TOP OF 1970 50' 0 to r 9 �' • 91% c 1 CV °' i N j rn .� -_ EMI III 80 III 00 82 83 00 84 00 85 00 00 REVISION #3 REVISION #2 ADDED NOTE TO TEMPORARY CURB DROPS ADDED CURB DROPS 73 +25 TO 73 +55 & 84 +45 TO 84 +75 MCP MCP 1/5/98 9/26/97 8 14 97 81 +00 REVISION ; 1 REVISED EASEMENT LOCATION III Founded 1946 im son Engineers Inc. p g CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS N. 909 ARGONNE ROAD, SPOKANE WA., 99212 -2789 PHONE (509) 926 -1322 FAX 509) 926 -1323 . SU LLIVAN PARK CENTER DEVELOPERS APPROVAL STREET PLAN - PROFILE INDIANA AVENUE - STA. 69 +00 TO STA. 85+00 69+00 9 +00 70 +00 71 +00 72 +00 73 +00 74 +00 75 +00 76 +00 77 +00 78 +00 79 +00 DRAWN BY Michael C. Phillips DATE 4/30/97 PROJECT NO. DRAWING NO. CHECKED BY Charles E. Simpson DATE (/41 11509 5 OF 17 U) CD SEC. 10, T. 25 N., R. 44 E.W.M. Mon Jan 05 09: 03: 50 998 „Z „Z „Z „Z „Z „Z CA CA Cs1CTICACA 09+LgL - Og+1.gl. Og+6 - 00+9'n „Z „Z IIMMI 2C'0261. „L • 00+00 L „Z „Z „Z 00+1.6 - 00+17L „Z „Z „Z Mal NEM L0026 L „L • C 00+66 LT6L64 „L • 00+86 * butoppns paqsruo '01S 01 '01S SI-11d3C ONtovJeJns L# Ma 3.1.V80 dOl ,0•9 13SAA0 NOLLVIS 31V80 1V131A1 3 AV8A 1V131^1 113mAela Mia II 406L6 L „L LG'2L6 L „L ,L 00+96 NMI LG'2L64 „L ,2 00+96 ia NIM 0 INM IIMI 11201 IIM Ma NM IIIM NiMI IIM IIIM MB 1 L0'2L6 L ,2 00+g6 IMIII 1.02L6 „L ,C 00+G6 CG'LL61. „L ,C 00+ CG'LL6 I. „L ,C 00+ LG'LL6 L 172LL6 L 476'2L6 L C00261. „L ,C OL'2L+C6 NEM LG'LL64 „L ,C OL'2L+C6 „L „L • 00+C6 INIMI t2'LL6 L - 476 . 2L6L „L ,C 00+26 „L ,C 00+Z6 ,C 00+Z6 „L ,C 00+1.6 IIIMIII CO0264 „L 00+1.6 - VC 096 L L2'6L6 L „L „L ,C 00+06 NM IIIMI 17C'0261. L2'6L61. „L ,C 00+06 „L ,C 00+68 ,C 00+68 LC'6L6L L22L61. GL'2L6 L „L „L , C 00+28 • 00+L2 IIMII IIIMI L2'6L6 I. L2'2L6 L „L ,C 00+88 „L , 00+L2 ,C „L ,C OLCG+92 Mal 111 GL'2L6L „L ,C OL'CG+92 1.6 6 L „L 00+98 IMI 1.68L61. „L ,C 00+92 „L ,C • OO+G9 6 „L ,C 00+G2 L0096 L '3'1 „L „L ,C 00+172 111Mil 1/12138 L00261 „L ,C 00+ '3'1 1-11d30 Hi OM NOILVIS Rid30 HAIM NOUN'S 8:1n3 Hl80N amp 1-1.1. nos IAI e:13 8 31VMS OW ino geino „Z „Z „Z „Z „Z „Z CA CA Cs1CTICACA 09+LgL - Og+1.gl. Og+6 - 00+9'n „Z „Z „Z 00+9Z1. - 00+OZL Z „Z „Z 00+0Z1. - 00+1.6 „Z „Z „Z 00+1.6 - 00+17L „Z „Z „Z 00+ - 00+6g „Z „Z „Z Og+2Z - 00+2 V•10 To . 1.Ad Gs..10 dol asJo 9909 ,0 1 ** . ouo0 qdsv * butoppns paqsruo '01S 01 '01S SI-11d3C ONtovJeJns 6C'LL6 L 8 06+26 t 3dA1 t 3d)1 V 3 dAl 01.# Ma 6C'LL61. ,0 1 06+C6 t 3dA1 t 3dAl V 3dAl. 6# ma C92L61. ,Ot 8 GL+92 t 3dAl 17 3dAl. V 3dAl 2# ma 29 ,0 1 GL+92 t 3dAl 17 3dAl. V 3dAl L# Ma 3.1.V80 dOl ,0•9 13SAA0 NOLLVIS 31V80 1V131A1 3 AV8A 1V131^1 113mAela NOLLV001 ONV 3c1A1 113AA).ela tt *e-.1 "N gz 1.1. 7 i? 01. '03S L6 . 171 8 86/9/1 00+176 . V.LS al 00+ *V1S - 3f1N3AV VNVIONI 311JOdd - NY1d 13381S ei311\130 AlVd NvAnnns 9L61. dOIN dO1N NOL1V001 1N3H3SV3 03S1A321 W.-F 01 9V+176 "VlS doda edno 121V210c:1113/ a3aav 11111111111111111111111111 03e111103d 30110N 'elH et' el381111N TWO 3N0 ADM 10 1.1.46!21 10 0603 >1°D- 00+26 00+Z6 00+1.6 AA/i 000...1111Dej 1 r m „ 0 0 Z „ . • 00+06 00+68 00+88 00+L8 00+98 00 + 9 00 +17 8 00 3Nn N n edri 9861. 00 I. dal 9 L '9261. 30018E1 OV021 NVAMOS JO 83N800 3S - 11VMONIM AO dal. dV0 SSV8E1 • NM OM NM MI II III MMIammin• 1111111111111111 CO co Oco 111111111111111 co co 00 ,09 = t 001 09 9Z 0 (133J NI) 31VOS 01HdV210 o smun uoilon_qsuop ionba Jewo8 AasJar MN 949JOU00 IIDTSUI 0002 oia no). :o:8 Two LZ L 0CL :13SAA0 LZ '22+LC :V.15 G20261. dVl Z 83 0G•917 :13SAA0 00 4om jo 146p,1 Jo 96 03 NO IS1A321 Z# NOISIA321 86 LI. AO 9 'ON DNIMV210 'ON 1o3r0dd L6/och 31V0 411111d *0 190140M A8 NM`0121 2Z21--9Z6 (609 XVA ZZ21.-9Z6 (609) 3N0Hd 68/..Z-Z1Z66 "VM 3NV)I0dS 'VON 3NNOONV 606 'N S?:10A3ANIIS ONV1 2 5) Sd33NION3 11A10 . o•W tlaaut6ug uoscluqv 00 823 NIS 6091.1. 861 IS DJ L6 fa 121 338 3A 0 JO 01 00+ 2:10J a H SNO 01 123 6 'VlS snrav VA313 a L g1111111!"0•••••••maNn....11•1 11111111 immonamp_i..mr.---nsrnerm ii • 0861. %Og0+ 1111111mmiLmi 11<' ' 3/V0 9-06 pepunoA 00 9Z +96 :310N 1111111111 11111 111 11111111111 • MOM iii 1111111 086 Mili ME MIMI 1111111 aNnodo IDMS „80Z„ Pu3 00+96 uosdw!S '3 sap:A.01A8 03>103H3 SC 96 ADM 10 ON 40 6p3 00 1111. rill Li l l I I I 1.1111, I I I I r4 oci rlo Liti CD 96 00+$'6 1111111 1111 1 "83&13A3 co Po (ii Co CA 0 00+26 00+Z6 1111111111 . 17Z 1264 'A 02 .Z+06 00+1.6 0 2 „00,00.021. .66' LZ ,00L 1.040 8 00'L 217 1 00'L 8 00'L GZ +L6 • 00'L GZ +L6 8 0G 922 +96 21 0G 26'LZ +96 8 OG'Ot C6'LZ +96 2.1 OG'tC 0000+96 8 0G*9 0004+66 0000.02L ,66' LZ ,00•L 001.0 „6G,I71.. , 1.9171. ,SL '2Z ,00•29 L 0 „6G, ,1.9171. ,2L'2Z ,00•99 £L0 „L1.2t.L9 • 20'e17 2G'9L 000G OLO -135±10 -135±10 , , V1 I 1.N30 NV1 I H10 N31 I Sr I 3A8 no ld-NOLLV1S I Od I Od-NOILVIS amp AO 30VA 86/kT/2.0 satudxal /1,4 adij. Isod epIns alcipcalA 09+176 .9dolanap Apadoid SD Jadolanap /Cq panowai a q GL+176 0 4 Gt +176 'DS AJoJodwal) doJa giro omaA4- Coact 'I'O'CI'S'AA) 9 o %-7/2 g lualuoo liDgclsv 1 -11dGC1 paloDdwoo 'V 2 8 ss010 `I.LIGLUGADd 91.9JOU00 4o V ** CO9dS SLOGG P94pDdWOO tUIDDj.-InS PISn- * slomS „20Z„ Jo Ul1J94U90 • ; • arms „aoz„ Co 0 0 00+06 00+68 -1U07-= . m < EIT .Ig nilli11 11 . 1 " 1111MENI 1.11111 luawaso3 /!Inn 3R aspu t> ,Lc 11 1111.1111111111111111111MMINI co o oo Mit Mom c ■-__ cn 'SZ +L6 'DS O ,L SUIDUI9J pUD 6L't '01S 2Z172+ZZ ' ,9 Luo4 se6uot-10****** )11omams Jo >poq o ! 1U9WeSDe Og+Lid. O OG +96 'DS wo.4 qJno o} uagolpo pls lno uo Alt:maps ***** 1018 41 `p.mpuols Alunoo umloOS 8 ad/ 'qJno alanuo0 luawa0 'pJ1DpUID1S AlUr100 9110>jOdS >1IomsPIS alanuoo luawao •-q- s.4041 JUJ99J01,g0(}) 1 i - u ‘ 7 JO V a C11 - PS . o0 a uo slulod mot 10 1SD 101 14 ,OV '11G ***** llom ibms ,9 ,01. lual-usso3 , LC >10 MA S a ,Z ,z GV0e111V2:1 01A 10Vd NOINC1 00+82 00+L8 CO - co *** sa!JoA ** ,9Z / :171. * ,L2 %Z uD1 U I e# ma 0 0 0 0 Z • .Q -a CO '4 1.) ,001. 03 4 001 9Z+L6 OT 92 3111\13AV VNVIQNI ni }jai • cor m 0 + : i 0 5 00+98 ,09=„1- :1V1NO NON 111•11111111111111111111111111111111111•11 9L61. 0 d0.1 L1. Jo 9 060d amp), Jag u}daa butoopns 18 t8no ,Z 11 aino 0 CO () (13 '1+ S ****ZZ L1. o L lsags L# aloN Gas •sso-10 LITIm wia8 pub alwAS PS q.mo lo dot M08 .I.1. 2.8) 'wolloq aioms apim * , Lc '00+gL •Dls lo %3 0 poci uat-11 4 00+CL ' 1 %0r!. og-H,L •Dis D °Z3 WOJ1 S9IJDA ems 1.01 UO GdOIS SSW° **** 98'gg+96 '04S 10 ,9Z 0 1 00+96 '04S 1D .-171. sapbA *** 0 L+66 'DIS 0 4 99'GG+96 - DS woij .9Z '00+96 'olS 0 1 ;H. ** luawaso3 ON 5flomapis ou ajoms .01. uet-R Attvi ii * luawaso3 ,01. ')Ilomepls ou Gloms ,01. ( ,LC s! M/8 JI * mS ,01. us '18 ,LC s! M/8 1 * luawaso3 , 1_2 5flomapis ,9 l0 MS , L salpms „90Z„ 1 - 1 - 1 - 10 i 0 1 ,001. © cwa8 ,g•0 .171. 00+98 00+•8 • ,z ,z m lomS 01. luawaso3 / 40 L6jO 6p3 7 M/8 ADM 10 NCI ej O 0603 /\, 7 . o> 7 0961- 9L61, AO dal 0861 9861 CD 0 866T :80 g0 uer