ZE-149-77 (2)A
54
r �
AGENDA, DECEMBER 16, 1977
SPOKANE COUN1t PLANNING COMMISSION
TELEPHONE NO: 456 -2274
Time:
Place:
ZONE CHANGE (Continued Item)
Friday, December 16, 1977, 9:00 A.M.
Conference Room A, Court House Annex
(Use Mallon Avenue entrance)
3. ZE- 149 -77, Two - Family Residential to Multiple Family Suburban
a. Location:
b. Applicant:
c . Site Size-
d. Existing Zoning:
e. Proposed Zoning:
f. Proposed Use of Property:
g. Application of Zoning Provision
h. Environmental Impact:
Section 27, Township 25, Range 44 E.W.M.
East 19.06 feet of Lot 9, all of Lots 10 and
11, Block 17, Hill View Estates
Joseph G. Ward
S 813 Pines Road
Spokane, WA.
Approximately 31,752 sq.ft.
Two Family Residential, est. 11/20/73
Multiple Family Suburban
Apa rtments
Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21.040
A topic of discussion at this hearing may be
whether or not this proposal will have a
significant adverse environmental impact.
i'lS1000 I
- 3 -
MINUTIS OF THE PLANNING CCIV P ISSICN HEARI OF j If, 1977.
WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commisst on did hold a public meeting
on December 16, 1977 to consider the testimony and requests of seve al applicants,
objectors and other interested parties concerning the below referenceif subdivisions,
zone classification upgradings, extensions of time and other items of business, and
WHEREAS, at said hearing opportunity was afforded those favoring and those
opposing all items of business, and
WHEREAS, Mr. McCoury, IV..rs. Byrne, Mrs. Rawlings, Messrs. Kennedy, Main
Quigley and Thomas were in attendance and constituted a quorum, and
VJHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission fully considered the testi-
mony given, the environmental review, and all other evidence presented, recommends
to the Board of County Commissioners the following:
1. PUDE -1 -72, FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: JOHNSON. That the
extension of time requested for PUDE -1 -72 - Final Planned Unit Development
be approved for three (3) years, subject to the conditions that: Upon the aban-
donment of the project or upon the expiration of three (3) years from the approval
of extension of time for the Planned Unit Development which has not been
completed (or commenced with an extension of time or completion granted), the
authorization shall expire and the lard and the structures thereon may be used
only for a lawful purpose permitted within the zone In which the Planned Unit
Development is located. (Motion by Mr. Quigley and seconded by Mrs.
Rawlings. Vote was unanimous.)
2. ZE- 103 -77 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE: OPPORTUNITY
INVESTMENT COMPANY. That the zone reclassification upgrade by approved to
the Residential Office Zone Classification (File Number ZE- 103 -77), subject
to the conditions as conatlned in the Planning Staff's findings, dated December
16, 1977, and subject to the additional condUlon that: The applicant shall
subinita more detailed development plan for tne. advertised property prior to
finalization of 2E- 149 -77. Note: Such plan shall demonstrate compliance with
all required Residential Office Zone setbacks, parking stalls and shall be .
approved by the Spokane County Zoning Administrator. The Commission conclu-
ded that the proposal would be compatible with surrounding land uses, and
consistent with recent zone reclassifications within the area. In addition
a declaration of Non - Significance was recommended, and the commission has
required that the provisions of SEFA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21c.
080 RCVV and Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 77 -1392 be
accomplished by the Project Applicant within thirty (30) days of formal
action by the Board of County Commissioners; as instructed by the Planning
Department Staff. (bcotlon by Mrs. Byrne, seconded by Mr. Thomas. Vote
was unanimous.)
3. 9.F.- 149 -77 - TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN: V+rARI
That the zone reclassification upgrade be approved to the Multiple Family
Suburban Zone Classification for Lot 10 and the East 19.06 feet of Lot 9, Hill
View Estates, subject to the condP.tlons as contained in the Planning Staff's
findings, dated December 16, 1977 and subject to the additional conditions
that: Improvement of 31st Avenue and Clinton Road along the project perimeter
to Spokane County Standards. Improvements shall include curbs, 30 feet of
paving and drainage control. That the proposed aoartment project be limited to
one multiple family building consisting of fifteen (or less) one bedroom units,
and that the proposal be approved by the Spokane County Health District and
the Spokane County Engineer's Utilities Department. The Commission concluded
that the proposal would be compatible with surrounding land uses, and consistent
with recent zone reclassifications within the area. In addition, a declaration
of Non - Significance was recommended and the Commission has required that the
provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21c.080 RCW and Board
of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 77 -1392 be accomplished by the
Project applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Board of County
Commissioners; as instructed by the Planning Department Staff. (Motion by
Mr. Quigley, seconded by Mrs. Rawlings. Vote was unanimous.)
4. PS- 1019 -76, ILLER FIRST ADDITION: HIGH VIEW ACRES "arid ZS- 71 -76, _..
AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN. That the reconsideration of
conditions be approved subject to the conditions as stated in the
Also that a declaration of Non- Significance be issued. (Motion
by Mr. Main, seconded by Mr. Kennedy. Vote was unanimous. )
S. PE- 1061 -76, HEATHER PARK FIRST ADDITION: SPOKANE COLONIAL REALTY
and ZE- 146 -76, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
That the extension of time be approved. (MLrs. Rawlings moved and Mr.
Kennedy seconded.' Vote was unanimous.)
6. PE- 1.150 -77, SALTESE RANCHETTES: VIGUE and ZE- 180 -77, UNCLASSIFIED
TO AGRICULTURAL. That the application be continued to the January, 1978
regular hearing of the Planning Commission for the purpose of readvertising
the zoning reclassification to Agricultural. (Mrs. Byrne moved, seconded by
Quigley. Vote was unanimous.)
7. PE- 1153 -77, NORTHWOOD SECOND ADDITION: ANDERSON and ZE- 183 -77,
AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEf:_::_'!L. That a declaration of
Significance be ls,sued and an EIS be required. ( Motion by Mrs. Byrne, .seconde
by Mrs. Rawlings. Vote was unanimous.)
8.. PN- 1154 -77, GREEN BLUFF ACRES: FRANCO and ZN- 184 -77, AGRICULTURAL TO .,
AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN. The the application be continued to the January,
1978 regular hearing of the Planning Comm ission,to allow the sponsor to meet
with the neighborhood group and prepare a revised plot plan. (Mrs. Byrne
moved and Mr. Main seconded. Vote was unanimous.)
9. PE- 1155 -77, NORTHWOOD THIRD ADDITION: GUNNING and ZE- 193 -77,
AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. That this application be
continued to the February, 1978 Planning Commissl on regular hearing at the
request of the applicant. The applicant is to pay for readvertising costs.
(Motion by Mrs. Rawlings, secrnded by Mr. Thomas. Vole was unanimous.)
- 2 -
AGENDA, November 18, 1977
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Time:
Place:
ZONE CHANGE
TELEPHONE NO: 456 -2274
Friday, November 18, 1977, 8:00 A.M.
Conference Room A, Court House Annex
(Use Mallon Avenue entrance)
5. ZE- 149 -77, Two - Family Residential to Multiple Family Suburban
a. Location:
b. Applicant:
c. Site Size:
d. Existing Zoning:
e. Proposed Zoning:
f. Proposed Use of Property:
g. Application of Zoning Provision:
h. Environmental Impact:
Section 27, Township 25, Range 44 E.W.M.
East 19.06 feet of Lot 9, all of Lots 10 and
11, Block 17, Hill View Estates
Joseph,G. Ward
S 813 Pines Road
Spokane, WA.
Approximately 31,752 sq.ft.
Two Family Residential, est. 11/20/73
Multiple Family Suburban
Apa rtments
Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21.040
A topic of discussion at this hearing may be
whether or not this proposal will have a
significant adverse environmental impact.
- 5 -
5. _ZE- 149 -77 TWO- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBUI BAN:
WARD. That the zone reclassification request be (eontinued to the
December 1:77 Planning Commission Hearing. NO'-'E: The applicant re-
quested a one month continuance. (Vote was unanii.ious).
6. ZN- 152 -77 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN AND MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN TO
RESIDENTIAL OFFICE: WELLS. That the zone reclassification request be
approved to the Residential Office zone, subject to the conditions as con-
tained in the Planning Staff's findings, dated November 18, 1977, and that
a declaration of Non - Significance be issued. The Commission concluded
that the proposal was compatible with surrounding land uses, and con-
sistent with recent zone reclassification requests. (NOTE: Mr. Main
left hearing room due to a conflict of interest. Vote to approve was
unanimous).
7. ZE- 155 -77, TWO- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE: WOOD. That the zone reclassification request be approved to the
Residential Office zone, subject to the conditions as contained in the
Planning Staff's findings, dated November 18, 1977, and subject to the
additional condition that the applicant install a residential type fence
six (6) feet in height along the east property line of the advertised site.
(NOTE: Fence to be sight obscuring). The Commission concluded that the
proposal would be compatible with surrounding land uses, (if fence provided),
and is consistent with recent zone reclassifications with the area. In
addition a declaration of Non - Significance was recommended. (Motion by
Mrs. Byrne for approval but with a revised plot plan reorienting the office
structure toward Mullen Road was lost for lack of majority; motion by
Kennedy for approval with a revision to condition 0 be made to provide
maximum privacy for residences to the east, was carried; vote 9 yes,
1 no).
8. ZE- 170 -77, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE: VANCE.
That the zone reclassification request be approved to the Residential Office
Zone, subject to the conditions as contained in the Planning Staff's
findings, dated November 18, 1977, and that a Declaration of Non -
Significance be issued. The Commission also amended condition Number
$? to require revisions made to the parking lots and landscape .areas tn`ile
order to comply with minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. The
Commission concluded that the proposal was compatible with surrounding
land uses, and consistent with recent zone reclassification requests (Vote
was unanimous) .
9. ZN- 171 -77, MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE: LA VIGNE.
That the zone reclassification request be approved to the Residential Office
Zone, subject to the conditions as contained in the Planning Staff's findings,
dated November 18, 1977, and that a Declaration of Non - Significance be
issued. The Commission concluded that the proposal was compatible with
surrounding land uses, and consistent with recent zone reclassification
requests. (Vote was unanimous).
FINDINGS
ZONE CHANGE
3. ZE- 149 -77 - TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN:
WARD
This proposal was scheduled for the November 18, 1977 Planning Commission
Review, but was continued to the December. 1977 Hearing upon request of the applica:
I.. SUMMARY:
The applicant's proposal is for 12), 757.5 sq. ft, of property to be Included
with existing Multiple Family Suburban zoned site.
The applicant's proposal Is compatible with exiting and planned land uses of
the area; is consisteni'with recent Planning Commission Zone Reclasslfica-
tlons; is consistent with the Regional Comprehensive Plan and the Planning
Commission's long range plans for this area; has or can provide adequate
provisions for circulation, water and fire protection, but could have possible
sewage limitations. NOTE: Lot 11 of Block 17 has the Multiple Family
Suburban Zone Classification; the applicant has requested a zone reclass-
ification of Lot 10 and the East 19.06 feet of Lot 9 of Block 17.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
A. Existing Land Use '- Site Vacant
to the north Vacant, future multiple family site
to the south Vacant
to the east Vacant, future commercial site
to the west Two family residential
B. Zoning History of Area
C. Comprehensive Plan
Proposal is consistent with the Regional Comprehensive Plan
Explanation: The Spokane Regional Comprehensive Plan Indicates
the site as being'appropriate for-residential uses.
- 3 -
Request
Date
Action Taken
to the north
Multiple Family Suburban
11 -13 -70
Apgroyed ,
to the south
Agricultural
10 -30 -51
Approved
*to the east
Agricultural
11 -24 -42
Approved
to the west
Two Family Residential
11 -20 -73
Approved
*Note: Final Plat was approved with Block,
1 designated as
a Commercial
Site.
C. Comprehensive Plan
Proposal is consistent with the Regional Comprehensive Plan
Explanation: The Spokane Regional Comprehensive Plan Indicates
the site as being'appropriate for-residential uses.
- 3 -
ZE- 149 -77 - TWO FAMILY RESILENTIAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN
III. SPECIAL INFORMATION:
A. Circulation
Frontage Type ADT
32nd Ave Secondary Arterial 1,430
� e ngineer's Review: The Spokane County Engineer's Staff have recommenc
d that access to 32nd Aven be prohibited.
B. Sewage Disposal - NOTE: The Final Plat for Hillview Estates required
that a public sewer system acceptable to County and State Health
authorities be made available prior to sale of lots In this plat. That
the sponsors, Planning Commission staff, and Health Department meet
with the utility companies involved to see if an arrangement could be
made for the utility company to assume the operation of the sewer syster
being installed to serve the plat.
Hillview Estates has a public sewer system which is managed by the
Spokane County Engineers pursuant to WAC 248 -96 -070.
In reviewing the Hillview Estates sewerage capacity, the Engineer's
Department ondicated that the Hillview Estates system is capable of
treating and disposing of 150, 000 gpd. If one area is increased in
density, this means that another parcel somewhere will have to be
decreased In wastewater flows like amouri or otherwise the plant
capacity will be exceeded.
An increase in sewer flow due to zoning should not be allowed unless a
restriction is placed on another parcel decreasing waste flows a like
amount.
Adjustment is the process of being made now by the developers to limit
the wate flows from the commercial area (Lot 1, Block 21) to make up the
difference between design flows and higher flows allowed by legal
zoning densities and some other changes that have occurred to date.
C. Water
Availability through - Washington Water Power No. 2.
NOTE: The applicant is required to comply with all previous conditions
for final plat Hillview Estates - PE- 701 -69.
D. Fire Protection
Fire Mains - Not available
Fire Hydrants - Not available
E. Staff Environmental Review
Concluded that a declaration of Non- Significande be issued.
' - 3 A -
IV. CONDITIONS:
The Planning Department Staff feels the following conditions would be
appropriate if the proposal is approved.
1. Approval of access by the Spokane County Engineer's prior to release
of building permits.
2. The applicant shall submit a specific development for the advertised
property prior to finalization of ZE- 149 -77. NOTE: Such plan shall
include structure locations, set backs, parking stalls and shall be
approved by Spokane County Zoning Administrator.
Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicle
shall be maintained in hard surface paving.
4. An on -site storm - drainage system for the project shall be approved by
the Spokane County Engineer's Office.
5. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for main-
tenance, acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall b
submitted for the project prior to release of building permits.
6. The applicant shall provide a performance bond to cover the cost of re-
quired landscaping.
7. Installation of fire mains and hydrants in accordance with the require-
ments of the Spokane Valley Fire Marshal.
8. Sewage disposal shall be approved by the Spokane County Health
Districts and the Spokane'County Engineer's Utilities Department
FINDINGS
ZONE CHANGE
5. ZE- 149 -77 - TWO FAMILY RESIDEN'1'IAL10 MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN: WARD
I. SUMMARY:
The applicant's propos al is for 1, 2757.5 sq. ft. of property to be included with
existing Multiple Family Suburban zoned'site.
fhe applicant's proposal is compatible with existing and planned land uses of
the area; is consistent with recent Planning Commission Zone Reclassifications;
is consistent with the Regional Comprehensive Plan and the Planning Commiss
ion's long range plans for this area; has or can provide adequate provisions
for circulation, water and fire protection, but could have possible sewage
limitations. NOTE: Lot 11_ of Block 17, has the Multiple Family Suburban Zone
Classification; the applicant has requested a zone reclassification of Lot 10
and the East 19.06 feet of Lot 9 of Block 17.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION:
A. Existing Land Use - Site Vacant
to the north Vacant,- future multiple family site
to the south Vacant
to the east Vacant, future commercial site
to the west Two family residential
B. Zoning- History of Area
Request
Date
Action Taken
to the north
Multiple Family Suburban
11 -13 -70
Approved
to the south
Agricultural
10 -30 -51
Approved
* to the east
Agricultural
11 -24 -42
Approved
to the west
Two Family Residential
11 -20 -73
Approved
*Note: Final Plat was approved with Block 1
designated
as a Commercial
Site.
C. Comprehensive Plan.
Proposal is consistent with the Regional Comprehensive Plan
Explanation: The Spokane Regional Comprehensive Plan indicates
the site as being appropriate for residential uses.
- 5 -
III. SPECIAL INFORMATION:
A. Circulation
Frontage Type ADT
32nd Ave Secondary Arterial 1,430
Engineer's Review: The Spokane County Engineer's Staff have recommend-
ed that access to 32nd Avenue be prohibited.
B. Sewage Disposal - NOTE: The Final Plat for Hill View Esta es required
that a public sewer system acceptable to County and State health
authorities be made available prior to sale of lots in this plat. That
the sponsors, Planning Commission staff, and Health Depart.nent meet
with the utility companies involved to see if an arrangement could be
made for the utility company to assume the operation of the sewer system
being installed to serve the plat.
Hillview Estates has a public sewer system which is managed by the
Spokane County Engineers pursuant to WAC 248 -95 -070.
In reviewing the Hillview Estates sewerage capacity the Engineers'
Department indicated that the Hillview Estates system is capable, of
treating and disposing of 150, 000 gpd. If one area is increased in
density, this means that another parcel somewhere will have to be
decreased in wastewater flow alike amount or otherwise the plant
capacity will be exceeded.
An increase in sewer flow due to zoning should not be allowed unless a
restriction is placed on another parcel decreasing waste flows alike amount
Adjustment is the process of being made now by the developers to limit
the waste flows from the commercial area (Lot 1, Block 21) to make up the
difference betweeh design flows and higher flows allowed by legal zoning
densities and some other changes that have occurred to date.
C. Water
Availability through - Washington Water Power No. 2.
NOTE: The applicant is required to comply with all previous conditions
for final plat Hill View Estates - PE- 701 -69.
D. Fire Protection
Fire Mains - Not available
Fire Hydrants - Not available
E. Staff Environmental Review
Concluded that a declaration of Non - Significance be issued.
- SA -
IV. CONDITIONS:
The Planning Department Staff feels the following conditions would be appro-
priate if the proposal is approved.
1. Approval of access by the Spokane County Engineer's prior to.release of
building permits.
2. The applicant shall submit a specific development for the advertised
property prior to finalization of ZE- 149 -77. NOTE: Such plan shall
include structure locations, set backs, parking stalls and shall be
approved by Spokane County Zoning Administrator.
3. Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles
shall be maintained in hard surface paving.
4. An on -site storm- drainage system for the project shall be approved by
Spokane County Engineer's Office.
5. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance,
acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted
for the project prior to release of building permits.
6. The applicant shall provide a performance bond to cover the cost of re-
quired landscaping.
7. Installation of fire mains and hydrants in accordance with the requirements
of the Spokane Valley Fire Marshal.
8. Sewage disposal shall be approved by the Spokane County Health District.
N EM
-t� i�z l
I' W
ACL ov
4
Z7
r" K
Ik
ZI
41-
j;q,
5a
ct
- 2 10 :.. a
}. ? x .' JT,- l r0, -,. —.— - 1 - I I • l
VA
aL
OCK
ly • j 8;f
:
lAr 1..
4 IL
a4)IT ps
♦17
.. . ..... ..
z - 7r.
. Ze
Si 1i S70
564
7 7 7'
3
-it
M ice`
M
rD
3.3
SEC. 27 T 25 N.R.44'EW..M.
SCALE I " = 400
Is 0.5'9,75t
Of /O67 I-ZI-7
DATE
ESCR I)OTIO IV
IVO
- D
T1-4t SEC:rIQIV TO 1`.-YL-AR-
Z
RZ
w
w
4
19
Ig
1-7
13
�l
La
22 5;
u
Is 0.5'9,75t
Of /O67 I-ZI-7
DATE
ESCR I)OTIO IV
9 - /5 '72
- D
T1-4t SEC:rIQIV TO 1`.-YL-AR-
Z
RZ
w
w
I
/Vc T E '.
SI-ZAD eo AREA DES IGNATE 1j VACA7 - IO1V
.
0
0
lN
6
��
3
G 7
Z
RZ
w
w
I
tk
A e.
.
0
0
lN
6
��
3
G 7
Z
RZ
w
w
I
TL.r
_
�l
La
22 5;
.
0
0
lN
6
��
3
a
G 7
Z
RZ
w
w
I
TL.r
LIZ,
La
22 5;
u
a
Z
RZ
w
w
I
a
Z
ZIJ
w
w
TL.r
In
22 5;
u
2- 12 G
a