Loading...
ZE-37-823'7-F;' United States 1. f Department of Agriculture Sod Conservation Service 360 U. S. Courthouse Spokane, Washington 99201 Elberta Walker E. 8002 Sprague Spokane, Washington 99206 Dear Ms. Walker: April 27, 1982 ` $49.iKA�t rgttpTl P,p6S4!CZ +1 � This Letter is in reference to your Dishman -Mica Road property between 24th and 28th. The elevation of the 100 -year frequency runoff event is 1997.0, based upon preliminary data. Sincerely, C.0 /G� WILLIAM F. WELLER Hydrologist cc: Gary Nelson, Spokane County Engineer's Office 0 U The Sal Conservation Service SCS -AS -1 is an agency of the 10.79 Department of Agriculture COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER Srosaar: 99260 March 23, 1983 D. J. Hume Company Seattle First Financial Center Suite 1260 West 601 Riverside Spokane, WA 99201 Dear Dwight: We have received several letters from you concerning Mrs Elberta Walker's zone change, located at the intersection of 24th Avenue and the Dishman Mica Road. Your questions concerned several of the conditions of the approval for this zone change. These questions can be grouped into the following three categories: (1) You requested that we vacate rights -of -way south of 24th Avenue which were acquired in deed number 7307020016. (2) You requested certain information concerning the 100 year flood elevation. (3) You asked for a clarification as to the improvements necessary for 24th Avenue. The following is intended to answer your questions concerning the three items listed above. (1) The right -of -way you requested to be vacated was acquired in order to realign the 24th Avenue railroad crossing. This is still necessary when and if there should be any major development on the west side of the railroad tracks. Therefore, we have decided to continue our ownership of this right -of -way. (2) The 100 year flood elevation for the site in question has been established as elevation 2002. You indicated that your site plan intended to have the lowest habit- able floor elevated to or above elevation 2002. If this was done your project would be in compliance with the Federal Insurance Program. (3) Your client could sign an RID agreement to satis the construction require- ments for 24th Avenue. However, it would be necessary for your client to construct a driveway approach north from your property line to 24th Avenue, and then east to the Dishman Mica Road in the 24th Avenue right -of -way. We assume that this approach would be paved as your parking lot is also paved. It would be necessary for your client to submit some type of plan of this driveway construction to insure that the finished driveway would not interfere with any future construction which might occur in the 24th Avenue alignment. If this were done 24th Avenue would not be a maintained county road. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer ary S. lso P. E: GSN:ao PlanninA/Engineer Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3600 SPO,ANE COOnTY COURT HOUSE 14,11 T/ve 24� w� PRoUEMC' T 51TvA7eDAJ w /T,-/ 1257 t,,,o��.o pr�o�os� Tr/A•! I J. We Rs�COw.�E^�D UACAi /anl ar i r4e K a A" Tiva,.�6rE s(fw n�D 2 S � - � c,.� A'u- oEa -u�vG k„rCr oNLV f�= � �XISi 1iv6" 2o�}v Lo�o.J. Z. rvls. (,,14ucc2 Co)vsri2vr--T lshG/b ✓E�o °� AS /✓ Z� .vE Cll+6E CO"- Drlrvr IE CuQf3tif S(O�c. 9C C *,t 5,vu fl 3D' of G �'b Q �, �,�y oTb�-�1Z APPr^or�c.z� n�a R- rS�� i AluT bo-o pZ�ElS5 yYJ TG�/� L Cis S (_F r ^ f l F NUEr7E� AStcc�� & f t447 S T N4 57o-�"�' March ` 1983, D. J. Hume Company . Seattle First rr "inancinl'Center }'• 1 ''; Suite. 1260 - - .. ' �' . • .. . West .601 *iverside •'..'' \': `...'` - :+ Spokane, 14A,99201 ,'.y.. 'Dear, Dwight,: .'We have ` received.'several - letters from' 'you -concerning Mrs.'Elberta Walkers - zone, t' t change, located at' 'intersectton,'of 24th "'Avenue and the Dish�an [•iica' Road. ` Your questions, concerned;' \several:of' the: conditions{- the approval 'for.this -zone change.-.' :.' These.que`stibns. can be grouped 'into the- ,folloibing, °three. categories:`' (7) ' You requested '_that we vacate, right s -of= way: "south':of 24th.'Avenue­wEiich were acquired in deed \ n . umber' 7307020016: '',, ; '•.• •'(2)•.You requested i . certain nformation concerning [he `100 year.flood'\elevation., ' (3), You- asked,'for. a„ clarification 'as to :the 3uiprovements necessary for'r24th`Avenue. i The following . is intended to'.;answei.,\your. questions; concerning, the :three, "if, ems listed`` .` above.._ (1).The \right =of -way you'reques'ted` be'vacaEed. was acqu red, in order, to, +realign the.24th'Avenue railroad crossing:;.' This id still;tnecessary when and if there .should be ' any major development,'on the west, side :of the °railroad tracks. _Therefo're,'..we have decided to continue' our ownership of ,this ' 'right;- ofrway: (2) -The" 100 year .flo6d'elevation•for ' the'site in 'question'has`been'`established as` - elevation 2002.' You indicated that,- your'site plan intended xo have the'•lowest - habit able floor elevated to: or \atio•ve 2002 .;:If'this_ :was'done,yourt project would be in compliance :'with, the Federal. Insdrance.Prog \rain.- ,,,, \Y (3),Your clienE could sign- '.6fi"RID` agreement'' to' satisfy ,'the'construction. require =• • ments for.24th.Avenue..`However „'it - would be necessary for \your,,'cl,ient to construct a ' driveway approach north`from. your prolerty :24th =Avenue, and 'then east to,th'e Dishman, Mica Road�;in f,4e ,24th Avenue rightxoff;iay 146 assume, that this approach would 'be paved as'your $ rking: lot >is\ also Zaved."`'It wou;id•'15e nece for !your client to” _ ,.submit sone., type) yf' rplan elii `drivgway;,cons`t•ruct insure, that the: - - finished 4.... - 'driveway would. not interfere, with any. future construction which -might 'occur in, tbe-24th •:' Avenue - alignment.. If,.this,weie: done 24th Avenue would not be a, maintained county road.\\. h .'.If•yoti have '.any. further questions ,'•please , do -.not lie's 1taEe to \contact us: Very truly•'yours; ?\ :• Robert S� Turner,- P.E. Spokane 'Coiin Engineer Gar S. Nelson P. E. F ` Planning,Engineer. GSN:ao All LAND USE PLANNING DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT ' bLP ' February 22, 1983 Mr. Robert S. Turner, Engineer Spo. Co. Engineers N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 RE: 24th Avenue at Dishman -Mica Road Dear Bob: Recently the Board of County Commissioners approved a rezone to Residential Office for my client, Mrs. Elberta Walker. (ZE- 37 -82). Your Department in their conditions asked for improvements of 24th Avenue in the present align- ment now existing on the ground. (See Exhibit A). We have no problem with this, so we are asking your staff to proceed on a vacation of the excess J �-- -:> rights-of-way acquired in deed 17307020016. (See attached Exhibit B & C of deed and map). As a matter of review, I am submitting a letter from your file dated 11/22/76 which substantially explains the potential of establishing 24th Avenue as a public road. Since a major P.U.D. has been withdrawn and a subsequent use implemented together with the formal establishment of a flood plain on the P.U.D. site, it is unlikely that you will be obtaining any other assistance in building 24th Avenue. Please review with your staff and let me know what you will be doing. Respectfully yours, DJH:sd cc: Mrs. Elberta Walker Enclosure: R.S. Turner RECEIVED, lPObANf i,fll;pTl EN61gf'h'U� FEB 2 51983 1 Seafirst Financial Center, Suite 1260 • W.601 Riverside • Spokane, WA 99201 • (509) 7477778 • Telex: 152897 HQ SPK if 7 "LED C- E , C at I WY 1I JUL 2 8 oc A!ilsli R-q court House Uh I f. *A I K 2149 6� ................... j I, l..... ... ld lul yn Pli -I 19 rin. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - — Li r o 2, ::O.th g .... a E on re 'n".n of --l', P-11t.111n, 25 f—ll I Ith of - ;:e 5,-J Co r ifht of Nay lino a -f ht of ..7 1* An- - Ca zv: rii Ina 50 f" f h . -1 —thk' 4=rtxr rl c t, 1 r l r t t 1'.,e of EjE! t' Z'l f-A of n ht a ,. to th_ % I r tDfLer Z 2 25 , It 44 ---------- ;,— Z. . . .... 14� ? twit b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) 9. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvement stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and particpating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required road improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. This applies to improvements designated for Dishman -Mica Road. 10. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 11. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable county standards and or adopted resolutions per - s -.taining_to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 12. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan require- ments are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. 13. That the Regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the Zone Change is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. 14. Structures constructed within the proposed project shall adhere to a 35 ft. setback from the property line after the right -of -way dedication as herein specified. This is to facilitate future right - of -way aquisition should the right -of -way be needed for the upgrading of the Dishman -Mica Road. 75, That the alignment of 24th Avenue as depicted on the proposed site plan is not consistent with the existing alignment of 24th Avenue and the existing railroad crossing. The applicant will be required to improve 24th Avenue in the present alignment and construct an access drive to the proposed Zone Change. This access shall be constructed from 24th Avenue to the proposal. A permit must be obtained from the County Engineer prior to construction of the access drive and the approach to the County Road System. c). COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, 'the use of on -site sewer disposal,.systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations.of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject fo specific application approval and ' issuance of'permits by the Health District. o. -4 9 s i r �� I F \ cop T— ul 14 r 9 1 P, all 1 0-3 .WTI AN Ave. •et.. r 're -/ca .4401 • /W .0 V /* 23 22 A WOOL! �Vvv V C. 3000 T. le" Cep_ L. 370' o 4 DL UL d cL AJL / MIP � - i ,P V- November 22, 1916 Fc. J&oes i;. 'libbard. E. 9100 - 27th Avenue, Spokane, Wa. 99206 Subject: Establishment of 24th Ave. Dear Sir: Some time ago you and the other property owners who use 24th Avenue vest of the Dishma:. -Mica Road as access to your properties requested that Spokane County establish, construct, and take over for maintenance that section of 24th Avenue. You have been most patient in awaiting an answer to your request but I believe it is time that you had a more complete explanation of the situation as it exists for establishment' of the road. The principle difficulty of establishing this road concerns the grade crossing of 24th Avenue with the Union Pacific Railroad. The present crossing is private and in order for 24th Avenue to become a County road. a public crossing would have to be established. This involves a petition by the County to the 'Washington State Utilities and Transportation Commission asking that a new public crossing be created at this location. If the Railroad Company dose not concur in the action a public hearing on the matter is required. At this hearing it is neceseary to establish the public need for such crossing. With the mall amount of present public use it is questionable that the Commission would order the opening of the new public crossing. In any event, even if they do not oppose a new public crossing, the Railroad Company would ask that the Commission require that the new crossing be constructed at the total expense of the petitioner, that is Spokane County. The Railroad Company has already indicated that they would also ask that the crossing be protected by automatic signals and gates. The current estimate of costa for such an inOtallation is approximately $60,000.00. Spokane County has numerous public railroad crossings now in existence that are unsignalised and so is in no position to be paying such a cost for a new crossing. I would not suppose that the property owners requesting the road to be opened and established would be able to bear any significant portion of the total cost of the railroad crossing improvements required. It would not appear with the current situation that the road is likely to be established as a County road soon. Alr. Jaale6 u. E. 97W - 27th Avenue, Spokane, 'da. 99206 Subject: Establiehnent of 24th Avenue I am sure that you are aware that there was a development proposal presented to the ypokane County }'lanning Commission sometime ago, which contemplated the use of 24th Avenue as its principle access. One of the conditions attached to the approval of that propusal was that-the developer be responsible for the cost of opening and improving the railroad crossing on 24th Avenue. At the time this development proposal was reviewed, a change in alignment of 24th Avenue was proposed to improve the road and the crossing. The necessary right of way for this change in road alignment has been secured but, of course, the improvements have not been made, as the development proposal has never been implemented. Although we do not have any current assurance that this development proposal will proceed, it still would appear that this is the best possibility for having 24th Avenue, and its grade crossing improved and eet"lished as a County Road. I hope that this gives you an understanding of the situation, but if you find that you do have further questions, I would suggest that you contact (buy Kennaly our Planning and Traffic Engineer. Yours very truly, Robert S. Turner PE County Engineer. RST - a t Z �; SM LAND USE PLANNING DESIGN 8 DEVELOPMENT February 22, 1983 Mr. Gary Nelson Spo. Co. Engineers N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 RE: Plouf Creek Drainage - 100 yr. - Flood Stds. Dear Gary: Enclosed for your review is an Exhibit showing 1 ft. contours of a site at 24th and Dishman -Mica, recently rezoned for my client, Mrs. Elberta Walker. Your conditions of approval stipulate review and /or compliance with the Federal Flood Insurance Program. My client desires to establish her ultimate responsibilities or pre- requisites to issuance of any building permit on this site. In your letter of 4/08/81 (See attached) you indicate a need for finish floor elevations of 2002. However, we now know that the ground elevation in question is beyond the 100 year flood plain and that existing ground elevations are approximately 2001 elevation at the lowest area of our approved site plan. Assuming we implement this site plan and that footings are no lower than 1998.5 with finish floor elevations lower than 2002, wouldn't we be considered exempt from com lia e w' no N'•' M ws the Federal Flood Insurance flood proofing standards or construction? b -: .F;'..{/eoq To further assure you that this protion of the site does not flood, please gbovt 2.00 see Exhibit B, a letter from a 19 year land owner /farmer who claims this site never flooded. Furthermore, no neighbors in opposition to our rezone rebutted this issue before the Bd. of C.C. as they had done at the P.C. Hrg. when all of the site was being proposed for rezoning. Let me know what you think as soon as possible. Sincerely, J. me SPOdANF z.CEIV nlipi) trob'fp�l�, DJH:sd cc: Elberta Walker FEB 2 a 1983 Enclosure Seafirst Financial Center, Suite 1260 • W.601 Riverside • Spokane, WA 99201 • (509) 747 -7778 • Telex: 152897 HO SPK d�fr one oo� come r 0�4 t U IMPKrn/Et9 FM ROAO hpOl4q1� as AG�E.SL .rAN�rtrls. �..'•.' �'._ %W3 Sco r TAP 1 9rcKy , ,• '1.ii;, /.;l y ; j' i' i � i I � I I I 1 '.;' . (, _ : (I . .7 Iill ill I i. I :i! jib' II„ III ills � l!I '(' �� i'f� 1 ;:I i I I ojQ��' 'r ; Ifl r; ) l i p fil r ; T 0 u San a cr v, \� - ONT v R a \b _ te a' • ,4 \ A ' .,c •. , I l \: Y _ .. 1 t _ 3"rti�.'`' f yS �I t �f '2 ���3: -� \1 \ \ 0• Jt - \s�.,e ". 'e:.:' a,�. - �'f;fx +L.`a�� Mon . .. TI .Y I•. Y.� �l 1':1 �'F ice. �•��. �:` � 4a ��Y I`- I y ' i `' y 4 , •.ti � a _•_.. . - -, El _ � 1 : z n� "b _ - lai : Y .f;.• _ ' _ Yom-.•: .' :. � _ S . 1 l //'' /{ 1 � ..� • � } � .i..` arf� � d%i 4`i 1: -- .�ti `'Yi, �y, • y }e .. aci ;r.,)I- .'.. yk;' �'v'A':.'t irv'r ":.[ •_ i'ff.. i,•r,,l•iv�;.� ": }. nf (V la`�n i, : Y r.._`n� Y ri •iV,x n y ;t'. 'f. i. {• /4_.1.iY.,gt -1 �, _ r. .. r 1 .vl, .A: =,''. .: """u"�* �ai i`r::.: '' �' 1 1 1 �YF r �`s.:. i',' > ?i } "� "_v i' ..:7 O WN 4.,r .-l. .. r.t;.- .4' 'i :•':° �: r. of � <,::,ta ^.' P,X''.i�.,�3yt.v ii ;y';" e`f- `2:': •+,;?. ,, �' r ~ :Y •: `l' \� .. ,r :ra: '• _ ,MMN {:n..br r'.0��.i,l .:'.:Ljp�r. .5_:.'; /o•'.. -V:1 °fj.�+yrtY fj• _ r + J.. N t i[•r 1 � � - �'_a;' e { _ _;.�':.;:.:ir':: Sr' �a :,CT;� ?�`s._4..: - x�i;_ 'M;C::::.:r. wy ` I , ry /' d1.4:_.`iV F',l �: ' : M !-:'� I t;,�L +�, a •JtP�. \� Tom' >:a , , . •,. r .,:. L 1 \ � �::�n';,tr �.;a,:v`:�in 1 ,,.,,� ,!�..;. j�' a'l:'•5� } q,a.:f •. � � ' / / � - C \, "�lC -rt,. i .. .,.': 4:a ��.� l �A .'J ; ^ D J . a.. '.'�:. • .LI, .� t' ��, a � . _ .�`, _ .. - : " y;v ir.` .. .; >i':.. V.� , ` � �1;t�2� : Wi...,+.� ;t•�. ; :t � } � \ I � ��'�' ',. 35.� f . } /i " �'r�.•�•�.M:v.ii a,,,r'. .j;..:.i "x': '7 -' � r - Si<'� :rr/ . � '�.,1�� i , .r:,�•.:: ....a.. �t=dr,�'�i'�£;:'Gv'!i4''.;ra'.. -�L I ,y [1 { F, e &• ' ,1 ,.,a :r. /... ,,!,... ' .:�:i1�..�kr..i.,o �,' S:z..,. ll a0`:�.:.' V �': •�:' 6( L/�� ^.:'Y.l \I, .�., •.a; rt',� "'�'s:i�'�,�ff 'f a' r . �:A:;� 'ib: ., - �':�,:..'4 ark lt', :6r.;ws�b -t w 4 , !e "�r • :':�'. L ' . �-t:'`+•`'`._.'s!hx . 4?':'.^�:I= 'Y£jy- :�...a.a J> , �.j�rr JJ ,N4 :;,`y`.Y^'' ' � - }' '1i ; fe;::i XS t rj,ar:' S`y •. :rt,: - � 'e�i.' %/`.'y� ='i; �;... 'awh 7 •'� .. .... " . � III I, _ _ '. - •.�.. : r 1 ; 3i'1:� ' •. ���/ ,''_, a � ,[> i P: `.i is I - r f I - '� 1 . "+' a ` +. }.! r.. :ir I�t, x ".f'.r- '�::��.•`-. - i.T. { :1 // j I ^A,. - ..< " flay, - - � . i'•,. air's.= .'�%;.x� "ice ' . {ii: 1•.ra'r. • rl: n t •ti~ '1. �- - �i:t �•. mil' :i '�"�'�',� -', , . I J .. , r. ii: p fti �t j.=L 7 f:A,i� `J --'. .' i? ,k Ali(4 Xel ai::;/ :. :i �,�.."': '�.'� �• icy": s." - ' 3 ' •t /qr.'t Mt . ok,`j;,,{ �.:,.., :y;' "•:= � N•i ar�' ;cam �t, N COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER Sip4oxAmm Wj%8xtxxCv101v 99260 April 8, 1981, Mrs. Walker. East 8002 Sprague Avenue. Spokane, WA 99206 RE Ploof Creek'Drainage Basi Dear Mrs. j Here is the..copy - of'topographical map you requested for property' on the-west side of Dishman-Mica Road between 24th and 28th Avenues. bur flood hazard insurance co-" Gary Nelson, P.E.,,has reviewed the site and the drainage patterns in the* area and determined the minimum elevation for a habitable building floor to be 2002 feet. USC E GS datum. Before you begin any work on, the site'you.shoul'd. ave your prepare a grading drainage plan for approval by this o -Very truly yours, -.1 e Robert S.'.Turner,, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Ve4rr Pi Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260: (509) 456-3600 I 5>Qet1.0 C.QN11 COI IT n OUSE Engin e cc::. .Gary Nei son: - Enclosure' e�l Ile e. Pi Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260: (509) 456-3600 I 5>Qet1.0 C.QN11 COI IT n OUSE Y 2 �F W 1' LAND USE PLANNING DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT March 1, 1983 Mr. Gary Nelson Spo. Co. Engineers N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 REF: 24th Ave. At Dishman Mica Dear Gary: Pursuant to our conversations, I have discussed this issue again with Mrs. Walker. In so far as the County is uncertain as to when 24th Ave. will be improved and established as a public - maintained rights of way; we would agree to the following: 1) No improvement to the present 24th Ave. allignment until such time as 24th Ave. can be completely built and established to serve more than our property contained in ZE- 37 -82; 2) We will build our ingress /egress improvements along the Northwesterly f � portion of your "trapezoid" rights -of -way parallelling the railroad tracks to the south boundary of the existing 24th Ave.; 3) We will participate in an R.I.D. for 24th Ave. for future improvements; nd r 4) Spo. Co. can determine where within your rights -of -way you want us to > relocate an existing water main presently bisecting our site from the ,0114° Dishman -Mica to properties west of the railroad tracks. O Respectfully Submitted, ght J. qlume CC: Mrs. Elberta Walker DJH:nm 49fivA0 ' 11)141 tNFip €t� MAR 0 21983 t Seafirst Financial Center, Suite 1260 • W.601 Riverside • Spokane, WA 99201 • (509) 7477778 • Telex: 152897 HO SPK COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER 99260 February 6, 1986 Mrs. Elberta Walker 8002 E. Sprague Ave. Spokane, WA 99212 RE: Dishman Mira property, SP 85 -402 Dear Ms. Walker: Ai-So SCE 3? -- S2. As I mentioned to you the other day, simple guidelines for developing within a designated flood zone are not available. In my review of the regulations and discus- sions with staff, it became apparent that only a few and very general "guidelines" are common between different proposals. I suppose this is because of the highly technical engineering analysis which is required to determine the theoretical flood plain eleva- tion which would result if a proposal is constructed and a flood actually occurs. Typically, specific project criteria become the controlling factors in the analysis and a proposal which may appear appropriate at one site may totally fail with the different hydraulic conditions found at another site. The common items needed to determine if a proposal is physically feasible which have been identified to date are: 1. A topography map of the site showing existing ground elevations and the existing designated flood plain area. 2. A backwater hydraulic profile of the existing backwater area using existing ground elevations. (This was just completed by the County for Plouf Creek.) 3. A topography map of the site showing the proposed ground elevations. 4. A new backwater hydraulic profile using the ground elevations from the proposed plan. After the above engineering information has been reviewed, these general guide- lines are used to determine if the proposal is consistent with the regulations and can be approved. 1. The proposal does not result in diverting water into areas not previously flooded. 2. The proposal does not result in injecting flood waters into the aquifer. 3. The new backwater curve resuLting from the proposal is no higher than the existing backwater curve. Public Works Building North Q11 J.- H ;r Street Spokano. Washington 9 (50Q) 4563600 February 6, 1986 Page 2 4 ^ � S_ _ 4. Proposed floor elevations for residential structures must be constructed above the flood elevation. S. Proposed floor elevations for non — residential structures may be constructed below the flood elevation by using approved water proofing techniques. As you can see, it is not possible to tak process and reduce it to a simple 1, 2, 3 type to rely on the expertise and work products of for the process to work in the end. It is not complex. e this highly technical and complicated situation. Therefore, we must continue the professional engineers we both employ an impossible task, just extremely Very truly yours, Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer GWK /set cc: Mr. Ladd Gary W. Kennaly, P. E. Planning and Traffic Division Engineer \� L� Gt,l At, GARY IMNNALY . - BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING ZONE ) RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION ) NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE ZE- 37 -82, AGRICULTURAL TO ) OF PUBLIC HEARING RESIDENTIAL OFFICE: WALKER ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Dwight J. Hume has filed a Notice of Appeal of the denial by the Hearing Examiner Committee of the above captioned zone reclassification application. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will hold a CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING at 1:30 P.M. on December 21 1982, at its office in the County Courthouse to consider subject zone reclassification.on property Generally located within an area adjacent to and west of Dishman -Mica Road between 24th Avenue and 28th Avenue and east -of n%on — Pa ' is Railroad right of way in Sect' 29- 25 -44. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a REVISED SITE PLAN has been submitted to the Board of County Commissioners tor its consideration at this continue& public hearing. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at the hearing and present testimony in support of or in opposi- tion to the proposed zone reclassification. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 16 day of November, 1982. RECE IVED 5909ANQ ff"AIT1 tNMNFK DECO 71982 WTT.T.TAM E_ nONAHUE , IT o � > TH t 1Ff!E —4':. r!!r�:..r•; ti t `,.. <� '..1L;t_ 2 7 y ' , _o p:::•� ++ � . {� �- ..._..� W � C I:. 1 .t! 19 T.t Z�J,_J r t; •,,,� J r Zel R , 11 mi '`' ` \mo +�? J' �owal._i= �^- ;+�...�r•cr ; 7 •.v R'r •'' , Z ;'• �L•s • L,.�.:+Sg ci t :r 24 TF}i\A T T 4 2 n 0 28 Z&3 77 82, I r a ?IRTH E. >' at I ST '00 101 102 y l;� 106, 107 'C6 109 1; I :, we:l2 1Ij 1A,� •t5 " Ito 1C I ,r A ' 1 �1tt, i f Z D.. _ � 3i IN ' �•� o•.o 1 F,�' \ �� � •� I 7:1000 Ili =.,�' ,•.� c � I '��11 \ �S. •�C\ , ' . 'V IP • \ `4` 37rla - I w rl l �1 ✓ ✓� L. a N ��. o c.' ;gi 9• p r CV v File No. ZE -37 -82 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee on September 9, 1982, and the members of the Committee present being Jane E. Myers, Chairperson, and Richard L. Skalstad. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Elberta Walker, is requesting approval of a zone reclassification, File No. ZE- 37 -82, Agricultural to Residential Office, for the purpose of develop- ing four two -story Office Buildings, with a site plan. C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, West Valley Thorough- bred Farms, pasture, and vacant. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for Urban development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural. 4. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 5. That the land in this area is unsuitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 6. That the applicant has not demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the pro- posed rezone is not justified. The Committee notes there is no other com- mercial or business zoning generally between 9th Avenue and 35th Avenue on the Dishman -Mica Road. 7. That the proposed use is incompatible with existing uses in the area. 8. That the owners of adjacent lands and /or their representatives expressed disapproval of the proposed use. 9. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed zoning to not be in harmony with the general purpose and will be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 10. That the proposal is premature at this time; currently the vicinity is sur- rounded by Agricultural zoning. 1 ;v File No. °�Z'E'37 - 82 C r1 FINDINGS OF FACT (continued) 11. The project lies within the Flood Plain Area. Detailed documentation needs to be presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee after consultation with engineers and surveyors pertaining to this sensitive area to provide suffi- cient proof that development can be satisfactorily undertaken without endangering the proposed development or adjacent properties. 12. That there would be an overall adverse impact on the nearby residential+ area due to increased traffic and the creation of additional access and egress points on the Dishman - Mica Road and 24th Avenue. E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that'the application of Elberta Walker, for a zone reclassification as described in the application should be denied. Motion by: Skalstad Vote: Unanimous to Deny (2 -0) Seconded by: Myers HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE ATTEST: WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Airector By: _ / p - Date: N { -. �.. -. O 1 .r STAFF REPORT DATE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1982 TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -37 -82 GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: ELBERTA WALKER STATUS OF APPLICANT: Owner REQUESTED ZONING: RESIDENTIAL OFFICE EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural (established in 1956) PROPOSED USE: Office Building PROJECT LOCATION: This site is generally located adjacent to and west of Dishman -Mica Road, between 24th Avenue and 28th Avenue, east of Union Pacific Railroad right of way in Section 29- 25 -44. II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION SITE SIZE: Approximately 7.4 Acres SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site is relatively flat with a substantial portion of the site within the 100 year flood plain elevation of Plouf Creek; railroad right of way forms the western boundary. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: Dishman-Mica Road provides the divi- sion between residential use located to the east and less developed property to the west. ZONING: North East West South LAND USE: Site North East West South Agricultural, established, 1956 Agricultural, established, 1956 Agricultural, established, 1956 Agricultural, established, 1956 Vacant, Pasture, Level Terrain Vacant, Scattered Residential Residential, Single Family West Valley Thoroughbred Farms, Vacant, Dishman Hills Generally Vacant, a Few Residences u ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -37 -82 SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued) NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED: Total Square Feet None 4 Approximately 19,200 sq. ft. Total Total Percent of Site Covered MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES: PARKING REQUIRED: PROVIDED: BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS 3 % 2 stories 48 spaces 48 spaces A. 'COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - The property is located within the Urban Category. The Semi -Rural Category is adjacent to the west, with Railroad right of way being the boundary. Therefore, the site is located within a transitional area. The transition of land uses from Urban to Semi -Rural could be handled by use transition through zoning or through spatial separation of uses through use of clustering and integration of open areas within the specific site plan. The Comprehensive Plan Decision Guideline 1.4.1 addresses "Develop- ment shall not occur on lands identified as being a 100 year flood plain, unless the developer constructs mechanisms: accepted by the financing institution and by the County Engineer as capable of pro- tecting life and property from flood damage; and which do not increase or change water flows which may damage other property." If approved, conditions are included to meet this goal. Transition areas within the Comprehensive Plan are delicate areas as several factors should be considered. One of the most important considera- tions would be, does existing land use and zoning indicate what type of transition should be required? Because of lack of development west of Dishman -Mica Road in this vicinity any number of transitional uses and development concepts could be used to provide compatibility with future Semi -Rural land uses and fit the general guidelines of the Urban category. 0 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -37 -82 III. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS (continued) B. SITE CONSIDERATIONS - The site is provided access by Dishman- Mica Road which is a major arterial and west of that is a railroad track. The site is long and slender and has flooding problems as mentioned before. The site does not lend itself toward residential development but does seem to lend itself to office type uses. However, at this time no Commercial, Local Business or Residential Office zoning exists on the Dishman -Mica Road between 7th Avenue and 32nd Avenue. C. HISTORY OF OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS . - The immediate area has had no recent zone change. The property west of Dishman -Mica Road has remained undeveloped, largely because of access, flood, and land use debate. The most recent zone changes west of Dishman -Mica Road are located approximately 1/2 mile north to Residential Manufactured Home, Single Family Residential, Two - Family Residential and Multiple, Family Suburban zoning in the late 1 70's. D. CONCLUSION - The rezoning of this parcel at this time appears premature. Currently the vicinity is surrounded by Agricultural zoning, and most of the property to the west is undeveloped and used for large lot residential. The Comprehensive Plan does not provide any specific decision guidelines that give direction to decision makers on rezones of this type. If approved, a more specific plan should be submitted detailing building elevations, light- ing, signing, and landscaping plans. IV. AGENCIES RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS, IF APPROVED a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. All current standards of the Residential Office Zone, as amended, shall be complied with in the development of this site. 2. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accord- ance within the, concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Com- mittee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 3. That a specific development plan shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval. 4. Specific plans for landscaping and maintenance, lighting and signing shall be required prior to building permit release. 11 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE- 37 -82' a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued) Applicant shall comply with 1 208' recommendations concerning stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commis- sioners Resolution #77 -1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements, or file appropriate documents to the effect that the NOTICE OF ACTION is waived in accordance with Spokane County Commissioners' Resolution #82 -0458 dated May 4, 1982. b) 7. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non- significance has been Issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the physical environment; a finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environ- ment are anticipated as a result of the project; and a final declara- tion of non - significance is hereby to be issued. COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet on Dishman -Mica Road for right - of -way prior to any use of the property. 2. Access permits shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit or any use of the property. 3. Applicant shall Improve Dishman -Mica Road in a manner consist- ent with Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. 1 minimum paving width Major Arterial Standard. 4. Applicant shall improve 24th Avenue in a manner consistent with Spokane TYPICAL roadway section No. 1 minimum paving width Access Standard. 5. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. 6. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed com- bined on -site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. 9C2. ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -37 -82 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) 7. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer,'will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be i willing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said im- provement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. This applies to Dishman -Mica Road. 10. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvement stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRe) to the extent of the required road improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. Applies to Dishman- Mica Road. 11. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 12. All- required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construc- tion, and other applicable county standards and /or adopted reso- lutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 13. Applicant shall construct a paved and delineated access approach(s) to meet the existing pavement on Dishman -Mica Road. 14. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. 15. That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed zone change is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. 16. Structures constructed within the proposed project shall adhere to a 35 foot setback from the property line after the right of way dedication as herein specified. This is to facilitate future right of way acquisition should it be needed when the Dishman -Mica Road is upgraded. 1.9 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE- 37 -82' C) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW, Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health District prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. 2. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of an individual on -site sewage system may be authorized. 3. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. 4. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibited. e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. 2. A plan for emergency equipment access is required to be sub- mitted prior to any land development. 3. Recommend approval with condition that prior to development of this property that an engineered water distribution system plan shall be submitted to the Spokane County Department of Building and Safety. This distribution plan shall include water main size, flows, locations, fire hydrant type and locations, water storage tanks size, and location and design criteria. 0 ,. . ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -37 -82 f) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Satisfactory arrangements will have to be made with the water purveyor, Washington Water Power Company, for water service prior to development. g) DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A surface land mine reclamation permit and reclamation plan shall be required if morethan two acres of land is to be disturbed or more than 10,000 hards of mineral is removed in any type mining operation. (For example, the removal of top soil or any other aggregate type of material to be sold or used for construction off the proposed develop- ment site.) Ile I - a , 1� r.W IELD Y f � I � EL 196sp SHANwo�I vE i >� W4TC04ERT DR. n CAP ZZ J J 6 tI Kbrb iv11551 ON AV E. z iK.�Xtit• .I AvE Y ; SI NTG I S 4 INTO O Jf rL $MPR� W 1 t BOONE J -^ n DESMET DFSmEr O I ^. yt c,. °e- DE5MET P.VE co". ,( �� � a_ QTAL O CATA LOU G eraLOO 4 -j 8Okc I cc F > g AY EL rnes ALKI ' .E'..•,HighSc}+ ZE -48 -8 ^' L A W <rvs ♦vim �'.. W = Y VEC - �„�A m �N � t i R •+++r +r.I RIVERSIDE 7 X i 2: v �EL.3993� L.9�' SPR UE ;IAVL? 2 POST FFICE. Al C v � --= 7 c 4TH PVE. 9-19 IIII J \ ^ II ZONI 1 �I11 it 11 II \\ ZONE C � J I II VENVE I 28 I AVENUE I AVENUE i Proposed Zone Classificatio Proposed Use of Property: i' L G- A L iD E SCF,-I!='TI0IV [-{ line .t' the F, 4 L Av. •. thrn e. lirt� c / � . "' y'he: �E /4- � :7/, r �,nC - r , o t e7�i Yh,�i,r r_ S31 2:7'F.� .3 !0 /?o thr� ',.• f R /1/v' /ir-;r r, F !::. / ?H. l�lc. ro ,3 C� l S f J /) :: :[. C ,', S_: / ,.R f r- r• - t 0 - t ,r; .! '� r r r r �> ;. i , r ;" r ' h : • ,) I ! r n 1 1 "7 !i . 1 v' h ; yl7 i $ SO 7' r_'t' a7' r 7t .917J r' r f _ or) thc: w'e S.7r " °rIy R; V-/ !_inr c >1 C,P.lt. , ^'i� "!7.'r7 31 " F_ a 128. f at fh, Cur ve JC.) 7` he right With a ,(' . /�d i .'I r1 C/ /L'. Gr // C`1 _jr 2 r 6? 1 C c7 /•q 1!('r• Gf .j (p 4 .1- 4 _`_• P't 7 - h rr err { .1 _!'ra n %'l, ^• r,: .J c ('� °/7 3O ' f 3 / C�:•STc71;�c� or �;c >, =/• fc. '!Ir soc.yh l /n,-• pf - f'lie lV'/` - r'' 7 the J �"3'i.?'L ✓,,�,�,i;� - the ,.:•u; //i /iri - D' /�. l ✓ /c o ; t/7� `E !�1 :3 c'i ,t.7nC•, o r �. yq. {;.r Yo 1"17c-- c n <<� F, f /w'. �'c. F; �'. �: /�'i �� /nr' 'I l7 '! lw ?_f "r - `.� c ,jl ;rr, :: r�.: i'_ CrT I fe 1 yc N vi { l;lcl. is 0.7.r,rY': Y /`/ VY /l rT i fro r /7/ // r��Jr l/i /!r)I C� tl/ - J /.�.- �/� / /)�' lam(° A /� /G 7 c ft "!)c U/ 199.9.E fe.r 7c / �r'c.:r: f;-l t oY` '±c'u;r,/;r>ta. Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property: /✓ouG /�ir4wnl k-= ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: 1. What are the changed conditions of the site area, which you feel make this proposal warranted? C'�r J�4A�!/«!S /UE 1�9at/r7 �SL" �L�rll� ✓y�f� J%9yl/ykG�/Ed�T A'OL /�Y� .c , ra T ��'� ✓v /r, � 7fav /.y , � Yl DF A4065L7fTY /a 772 —E /) — 2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on %he - adjacent properties? nI lln& Rev. 2/3/81 • �:� ✓' .. .T.f'•. i - ; ' -. I�,l �� ^/ j /(/ / SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION Date:_ / Application No: _Z - <57 8 Z Name of Applicant: Street Address of Applicant: �• g�/� S,�i���CYC1L City: State: 114, Zip Code: 972U6 Tele. No. Z,� — ,332;? Name of Property Owner(s): Authorized Agent representing Owner % (if other than owner): y Existing Zoning Classification:. Date Existing Zone Classification Established: Existing Use of Property: I/llc-�T Proposed Zone Classificatio Proposed Use of Property: i' L G- A L iD E SCF,-I!='TI0IV [-{ line .t' the F, 4 L Av. •. thrn e. lirt� c / � . "' y'he: �E /4- � :7/, r �,nC - r , o t e7�i Yh,�i,r r_ S31 2:7'F.� .3 !0 /?o thr� ',.• f R /1/v' /ir-;r r, F !::. / ?H. l�lc. ro ,3 C� l S f J /) :: :[. C ,', S_: / ,.R f r- r• - t 0 - t ,r; .! '� r r r r �> ;. i , r ;" r ' h : • ,) I ! r n 1 1 "7 !i . 1 v' h ; yl7 i $ SO 7' r_'t' a7' r 7t .917J r' r f _ or) thc: w'e S.7r " °rIy R; V-/ !_inr c >1 C,P.lt. , ^'i� "!7.'r7 31 " F_ a 128. f at fh, Cur ve JC.) 7` he right With a ,(' . /�d i .'I r1 C/ /L'. Gr // C`1 _jr 2 r 6? 1 C c7 /•q 1!('r• Gf .j (p 4 .1- 4 _`_• P't 7 - h rr err { .1 _!'ra n %'l, ^• r,: .J c ('� °/7 3O ' f 3 / C�:•STc71;�c� or �;c >, =/• fc. '!Ir soc.yh l /n,-• pf - f'lie lV'/` - r'' 7 the J �"3'i.?'L ✓,,�,�,i;� - the ,.:•u; //i /iri - D' /�. l ✓ /c o ; t/7� `E !�1 :3 c'i ,t.7nC•, o r �. yq. {;.r Yo 1"17c-- c n <<� F, f /w'. �'c. F; �'. �: /�'i �� /nr' 'I l7 '! lw ?_f "r - `.� c ,jl ;rr, :: r�.: i'_ CrT I fe 1 yc N vi { l;lcl. is 0.7.r,rY': Y /`/ VY /l rT i fro r /7/ // r��Jr l/i /!r)I C� tl/ - J /.�.- �/� / /)�' lam(° A /� /G 7 c ft "!)c U/ 199.9.E fe.r 7c / �r'c.:r: f;-l t oY` '±c'u;r,/;r>ta. Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property: /✓ouG /�ir4wnl k-= ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: 1. What are the changed conditions of the site area, which you feel make this proposal warranted? C'�r J�4A�!/«!S /UE 1�9at/r7 �SL" �L�rll� ✓y�f� J%9yl/ykG�/Ed�T A'OL /�Y� .c , ra T ��'� ✓v /r, � 7fav /.y , � Yl DF A4065L7fTY /a 772 —E /) — 2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on %he - adjacent properties? nI lln& Rev. 2/3/81 1, J _ APPI - ATION FOR ZONE RtCLASSIF 4TION -- continued -2 This section of the application will provide th written verification that the applicant has had agencies identified. Results of the preliminary ed in the proposal before final submittal to the 1. COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE e Planning Department's Staff with preliminary consultation with the consultation should be incorporat- Planning Department. A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Ou'r requirements .for, submitta of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied. Signature // Date) 2. COUNTY UTILITIES OFFICE A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have byn satisfied The d signated water urveyor for this site is ( Y 1I ✓!ti_ A I �7�/ - -- r - -7 F' zl� (Signature) 3. 17 WATER PURVEYOR (NAME) Y L o a) The proposal (is) (is not) located within the boundary of our service area. T> !s /h 1,1 —1 o :r pole -,'a/ 5 ,2r -, b) Satisfactory arrangements (have) (have not) been made to serve this rt proposal. -- c) We (are)'(are not) able to serve this site with adequate water. A 71,24- _ Signature (Dat 4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied. This proposal is located in Fire District # , fsa5sQr Signature E5 - tv FIr'£ Fww tn,o PkR NvIDW Date) ant, caMPos4'1 To ALL cuRr-EN - r 63I/14Stnly PtM, MFtHhNkhC --, PWN13X CoCtL'S AT - nMF OF B(t.LLP /n( iF R/W r Aj S. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT A liminary consult tion has been held to discuss the proposal. The app'I c nt ha b i n info med of our requirements —qnd standards. Signature / (Dade' I, THE UNDEh9IGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW- LEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE SITE PRO POSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHALF. x(Signed) ` 1_r- �vJ/'� Date: (Address) Phone: 92/- 3,32 zip: W,7�6 NOTARY Date: -�f `�C9 NOTARY SEAL: SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT Date: ., Rev. 2/3/81 H 1 IZo 0 2419-25 16 ® ° 17 m.i8 ` _ .fib e 23 1 822` ® 1 �+ 21 0 L24- to is A, ills& 26T".'AVE. 72 - 56 a� K .I JOINS 47 0 nC3dC3C3 nn0000G i 7a rA 1'STORANE�p ° L�C=l ®CAD IC:IOC ° fL��Ij +o�.lponc�o ®C:JY�C -I ®Or, ZONE 25 36 2M AVE oZdNE A CHICAGO hfIL ` - -- 51 PAUL &PA I I II `Y I I y dt �- _ 1 r\nr I 11 I T� J I I I , I I I I I I \ I 31 ��Ie II rr = I I L 125 T24N I I 6 I ` Iltil( If 1 Ji ll 00001]Q w X AYt ZONE A p W a g 20 1 sre W X 0 � �Q Art Q00 oa�o ❑OOO�❑ 00001]Q 000OD❑ W a ^ _ �,. W X 0 ' a J P 4 T25N �A7M AVE ❑ T14 N" 0 Ln (n 0 Z 0 o 0 $ W s W W C Q G xA mr m e a ca Ocr z a U ¢ 8 W c� "= ZZ z �190 QZD Y — = s" O CL 2 NS 61 1 54 JACK FINNEY ENGINEERS BEFORE THE WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION ZE- 37 -82, AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE: WALKER NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Dwight J. Hume has filed a Notice of Appeal of the denial by the Hearing Examiner Committee of the above captioned zone reclassification application. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that-the-Board of County Commissioner-- of Spokane County, Washington, will hold a public hearing at 1:30 P.M on NOVEMBER 16, 1982, at its office in the County Courthouse to consider the above- mentioned application for zone reclassification on the following described property: Generally located adjacent to and west of Dishman -Mica Road between 24th Avenue and 28th Avenue and east of Union Pacific Rail- road right of way in Section 29- 25 -44. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony in support of or in opposi- tion to the Findings of the Hearing Examiner Committee. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 28 day of September, 1982. WILLIAM E. DONAHUE CLERK OF THE BOARD by Rosanne Montague, Deputy PUBLISH: SPOKANE VALLEY HERALD October 13, 1982 6`�asanr :eNntr�r�, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE 12 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (map) c IN T 0 '1' , .\ F :;i•.l•1- P+ —�--ir ��VC�' � �.1: �) ........ li .y t .r- •� sr�i h�..v�,, b I c1TH Ll r, '.1 ,`, •..�+_`(�. C O � �� 7 . . T�' � � r"�•l t•!.r.,�.�. 1 v.�sp�: � �. 7 �. .,.,.�.�! I 't CC _ j � O�� ' ^� '� •��� .fi ;1 2474} \p ?4TH - 3 7 K-1 x � t C 2t3 YE. It 2 7T l 1 , 4 n � CE,, 107 C ^ I 'G ' 1 \ I 'Q :..0112 .�3 Itq �•�5 Ilo C; 1 i:A 1. t 'I t 1 rr 7:1000 I aJ'� A '1'O THE BOARD OF CUUM'1'Y ConnISSIONEIis rt � L � U L U Appeal Fee - $75.00 P231982 COUNTY CMMISSIONEP Name: ��✓ Address: �✓ /, Home Phone: f IT ,P ease Prinl // ,e L lew s Today's Date Zip Code: 9926 Business Phone: 9 9-c �j Hearing Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed Title: Preliminary Subdivision Number: Zone Reclassification Number: Z6 Date of Hearing Examiner Committee Action: 14? -9 16 /,'S — � Signature: Signature of Authorized Representative: Address: YOUR REASONS FOR APPEAL Cl --------------- OFFICE USE ONLY s poth"i (jig"11 E SEP24 + Copies to: Planning Engineers / Environmental Health Norma Smith Fee 5 6 ,p� Fee Received: Check 7�_ Cash Receipt Number I[earing Date: - SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION APPEAL REQUEST FORM Your name: D. J. Hume Date: September 23, 1982 Address: N. 120 Stevens, Suite 300, Spokane, WA 99201 Phone No-- 838 -8443 Planning Commission Action Being Appealed Title Agricultural to•Residentail Office I .D. Number E�37 -82 Date of Action Sept. 16, 1982 Signature Your Reasons for Appeal: The or000nant, Mrs. Elberta Walker did not retain council for the presentation to the HEC and was therefore unaware of the need to mitigate blems of traffic, flooding and computability of land use - as were ressed in the HEC Findings and Order. She now has council, and the project is being revised to overcome problems and concerns expressed by the HEC. w File No. ZE -37 -82 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION ' This matter having come before the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee on September 9, 1982, and the members of the Committee present being Jane E. Myers, Chairperson, and Richard L. Skalstad. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Elberta Walker, is requesting approval of a zone reclassification, File No. ZE- 37 -82, Agricultural to Residential Office, for the purpose of develop- ing four two -story Office Buildings, with a site plan. C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, West Valley Thorough- bred Farms, pasture, and vacant. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for Urban development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural. 4. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. S. That the land in this area is unsuitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 6. That the applicant has not demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the pro- posed rezone is not justified. The Committee notes there is no other com- mercial or business zoning generally between 9th Avenue and 35th Avenue on the Dishman -Mica Road. 7. That the proposed use is incompatible with existing uses in the area. 8. That the owners of adjacent lands and /or their representatives expressed disapproval of the proposed use. 9. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed zoning to not be in harmony with the general purpose and will be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 10. That the proposal is premature at this time; currently the vicinity is sur- rounded by Agricultural zoning. 1 OFFI . OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGIN -- v-:R J S. JKANE COUN - i Y, WASHINGTON A °PLICATION TO PERFORM WORK ON COUNTY ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY PERMIT NO. �� NAME OF APPLICANT — DATE r. ADDRESS ''�%� _''�'"'' " PHONE NO. JOB NO. STATE CONTR'S LICENSE NO. The undersigned hereby applies for permission to v0N: 2)CI • r,: n, [ `J.•U :::'4': ... r)_i a.... .: Y. L_ JlE ] i • •fl_iL, Vi'Lii 20' rl �i'a. iilli: CULVaM AS DESICii'';D r%Y j{IIFiLY!,' :'I/:' .'.' ...,::a . - Sr; Pl'.:N Ai'fA:Y,LD LOCA1':a: Qi. .:.J :;I r:,,, 111:1fL pa:i ^.l rv,i li:: t, iJ I)::.a.. t.w. 2 41 " ! :'iU 2 811- 1 riSJ✓I`lu +'w• Pursuant to franchise NA Dated - � - Date Work to Start JUNE 29, 1981 The estimated time required for completion of the above work is ONE a�11K which the petitioner agrees to prosecute with all diligence and speed with due regard for the rights, interests and conveniences of the public. Petitioner further agrees to perform the work in strict compliance with the provisions enumerated below and states that he has read and -Mil adhere`to the general provisions applicable to permits contained on the reverse side of this form. The undersigned guarantees that if the backfill, street surfacing or improvement fails within one year from the date of final inspection by Spokane County, he shall pay the �0 the County for making repairs or restoration of the roadway and improvements. In consideration of the granting of this permit it is agreed by the applicant that the County of Spokane and any officer or employee thereof shall be saved' harmless by.,the applicant from any liability of responsibility for any accident, loss or damage to persons or property, happening or occurring as the proximate result of any of the work undertaken under the terms of this application and the permit or permits which may be granted in response thereto, and that all of said liabilities are hereby assumed by the applicant. It is further agreed that if any part of this installation interferes with the future use of the highway by the general public, it must be removed or relocated, as..designed by the engineer at the expense of the pwmitee r his successor in interest_ - 1 4fAr' /� SIGNED - (� G•k 6 4 A r _.L"tr A& IT -- �.t'+ PERMIT ?o�, Subject to all the terms, conditions, and provisions written or printed below or on any, part of this form. PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED the above applicant to: CON67TWGi T!iiO FI.XW Ai'T'ROACHE.3 AS RXe 4MH UhD,nSTANDIs•.G THAT CHANvE IN USE OF PROPTRTY MAY :i0lilr'IC9TIOit OF APi'F.CAC6^5 P-? LETTER DATED'JUDIE 24 1981 - •PROVILE;' LAXDTRG I -ItiV. IbII1 2 1/2r, SLOP: I'FCE TIML Cr SPOVIXiM TO R LaIT- Ok-WAY LIM- idiD a w 41"L CM •R®ors ��nc9af� �sxv,•.gvit ��, °''4�aQQ.(G�2 �s4 �c.�cl� :� � : w\ PERMIT FEE $1v•CO INSPECTION FEE S�D•00 TOTAL ��'�'•� ' A bond in the amount of 35CO.O0 Ci iail _i is required to insure compli. nce with the above conditions, said bond to be kept in full force and effect for a period of � r ears following completion of work authorized by this permit. . I INSPECTION REQUIRED - 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED , Call Permit Office 456 -3600 to notify when work begins and schedule inspection :s 1 .•, This permit shall be void unless the work herein comtemplated shall have been completed before e'lUtll.htl " -'' ''' "' ,•'1`>�'� - -" ; w. COUNTY ENGINEER - r"r�•.n �• BY � ..� ..� DATE It is the responsibility of the applicant to notify all utilities and private property owners when such property is liable to injury or damage through the performance of the above work and the applicant shall make all necessary arrangements relative"to the protection of such property and /or Utilities. UTILITY DAMAGE IS COSTLY. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG.' OFFI( OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGIN"R SP -KANE CO`dNTY, WASHINGTON /"'PLICATION TO PERFORM WORK ON COUNTY ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY •,, % {± PERMIT NO. C? 2 ' :AME OF APPLICANT _..Ltti .ti a., DATE :N r•!- '�•(�'- ^ADDRESS K " PHONE NO. JOB NO. ` .`"•' '' STATE CONTR'S LICENSE NO.— The undersigned hereby applies for permission toy• •CON511iucT if 4 :;ZDsdi'j'r:. t OAU . -. = i.'�A.:t: :i •' ^ ? S{!U4ti STJi hE-5 T 0? :. D13HMA"1(;A WA) kriL P!:C;'OSa) 3ENME 171VR Y t • IDi:N �� � Ce ©tom � =:<- - ... ; ;,.,,•':.:�.< V Pursuant to franchise ,A Dated Date Work to :Start JUNE 29, 1451 The estimated time.required for completion of the above work is O'I'L' o1m. which'the pet itioner,agrees" to',: \ prosecute with all diligence and speed with due regard for the rights, interests and conveniences of the public. '•:1, r:�,,,, ` ; . Petitioner further agrees to perform the work in strict compliance with the provisions enumerated below, and states that'he has :read and will adhere to `dhe general provisions applicable to permits contained on.the reverse side.of this form'. The undersigned guarantees.'t hat' iffy ;dhe backfill, street surfacing or improvement fails within one year from the date of final inspection by Spokane County, he shall. the 'c_;cosi the County for making repairs or restoration of the roadway and improvements:' In consideration of;the'granting of this•, It is'agreed by:the applicant that the County of Spokane and any officer or employee thereof:'shal l be saved tiarm less by the Iapplcant ; froni.any liability of responsibility for any accident, loss or damage to persons,or property, happening or occurring �as the Proximate: res :, ;.a ult'° h { ofan,of the work undertaken under the terms of this application and the permit or permits which may tie'granted.in resp y onse•.thereto and that all of said liabilities are hereby assumed by the applicant. It is further agreed *that if, any'part of this znstajlation I terferes. with ,:the future y : e, of the highway by the general public, it must be removed or relocated, as designed b_ y the engineer at ;tFie expense ° , • of�th`e' • permitee or his successor in interest. _ - r. ;•'r Y ' ,' , i- . SIGNED " 5r i tl;V •, TITLE c t4 PERMIT ;;. .SrJject to allAhe terms;: conditions, and provisions written or below or n 6f this form. PERMISSION, IS HEREBY• GRANTED the above applicant 0: ' + ", ^.'�` ^'' •• :C;,; CONSTRUCT ONE.RLSIDP.NTIAL ROAD APPRaGii TO 24'14i AVPI4UE AS`'ItECdJESTnD.: ASAX.' t,TtAUE:•OP =tf }, 5 RICK ' EDGE OF `IftAVF.I.Ln 14:.7 i' .1 LIiv SEC's IZMI t OF •JUNE 24 i(E. APPAOACii:; i a q�11e, , VS � X05 8�o1�1►u� �n Alu:e,��dt � -` �:�� n�\ W10.�0 2�.� PERMIT FEE INSPECTION FEE i,.00 CN • A bond in the amount of u is required to insure compliance with the abo 've " conditions,`saidbondMto. tie keptPim full• 'force and effect'for a period o : " ' n '' r years following completion of work authorized by. this permit:' "; �p ,k ;,- " " INSPECTION REQUIRED — 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED ,`t ! '= `':i `'•" Call.Permit Office 4563600 to 'notify when work begins and schedule in3pection' �I ,This permit shall.be void r unless the work herein contemplated shall have been completed before 1 e'.. ig�62<•:_� ,. ' COUNTY ENGINEER �' r r:' Sal. r• BV %f,,(,e.... -, -f' '"iJ°t _ DATE 1 i. 1 ".e.t It is the responsibility of the applicant to notify all utilities and private property owners when such property is liable to injury, o; damage, . through the performance of the above work and the applicant shall make all necessary arrangements relative:to the f protectiomof , iudt`t Y Z t•property and /or Utilities. ; "�; •." .y '•.:,;', ° "t'• UTILITY DAMAGE IS COSTLY. CALL BEFORE VOU'DIG. Jyi ^'�GST 1. .n.,..'I{w•... . ..' Via:...:. ..:.i 3:w:. >..1''`:. s'y:n Y f:'CV .4 SC../.w.. �. a. .I.L.- S.'J2J.,i c.. �, .e . -• AAA OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date , 19— Inter - office Communication From A - 0 uE Td G k1cG,4 c7`er o /o c� .Form 327 —C R . l yl cd f Z ,6 7 1 6eretA WA 1kE2 4 To /Zl ZE 37 -SZ 1 -, �JRS (,JAl — bpd y � ��arlyue � 77,e �w 9 7:2e 1 Dro�et-Ty is ,vo7 /,o f1 /3d da� A // 7 ° jf9rSE cd/ ,moo vc/ i /�J�rd ues7, es�' /30e 7 p>" / aTi d e- 7e�v /- 07 o r^ ,� !vl o� w O a7 w / In � c2es �,, C9� Spa, 7 fff Q e o 2,. PfA,,f:s R t - o7Cee- - S . z0 Fw.v -P&- uC, - ,' �ioYtei• ��/PoSi� /oz `�O 2 e �vn� 3 • !J ayLm a.- ? I %CG, s • (� � YZ@ - ZunIZ_ . j .. . — 1 • ,Qu�•c� �,;.,. �f1.� -c�— .Sc.�e. 1995 at /F&o L4 ARC�� i is To lzmivvLo"& do-A, u '11aU-k -tR ff �rowt 12 L U �,b Q V A-A e7� Ted . C,4w i7_ 5e c-- S/ rx 7 0 , R' P,s pry.. C a g t % Qr Gz� T ' 1;v 1= l oa c..G e it vel L 4 2 - Q UDC / -% w' ✓[X4 , xx,, 42 ii f I'. - rte vy . �7 sew 2 �/'� 7 z8' 7t ' PC /1 cu2ue is R om deaC /fie. O ,t pry.. C w ICY 41 ®�- w 7 . Qr 1-100 C� c(i S - r� y 2 -D LAND USE PLANNING DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT 54 -z9 zE 3 7-8L Beginning at the center line of the Dishman Mica Road (C.P.H. 1153) and the north line of the SE 1 4 of Section 29 T.25N., R. 44 E.W.M.; thence N. 89 ° 05'20" W along the north line of the SE'- a distance of 35:51 feet; thence S. 31 27'E along the west R/W line of C.P.H. #53 a distance of 59.18 ft. to the True Point of Beginning; which is 50 ft. at right angles from the northline of the SEA and on the westerly R /W_line of C.P.H. 1153;/thence S. 31 27' E a distance of 128.74 ft.; thence along a curve to the right with a radius of 1870 ft., a central angle of 11 09'30" an arc distance of 189.26 ft; thence S. 71 08'09" W a distance of 245 ft. more or less to a pt. on the O.W.R. &N. Co. R.R. R/W line; thence N. 21 19'50" W a distance of 310 Ft., to a pt. which is 127.01 ft. southerly along the R.R. R/W line from the north line of the SEA, thence N. 71 08'09" E a distance of 199.48 ft. to the T.P.O.B. Seafirst Financial Center, Suite 1260 Spokane, WA 99201 . $ U iS�PI. �Y� StH1�3: X �:$ �15��i1514Xk^ X�C} i741� .Xb3cY`4?�SX�{pEQfl"�ffi9ffi�f},'id1 AM ! I E dp3 7aw82 REvisEb LE4AL ..b e Y w Y ° `� � �.tl <..✓'_.n -Ir• u �i "i.T _l.�J'P .._ ?, �!�La. � ...%'� l F-1 3 le No SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER INTRODUCTION ZE -37 -82 5q _�q This matter having come before the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee on September 9, 1982, and. the members of the Committee present being Jane E. Myers, Chairperson, and Richard L. Skalstad. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Elberta Walker, is requesting approval of a zone reclassification, File No. ZE-37 -82, Agricultural to Residential Office, for the purpose of develop- ing four two -story Office Buildings, with a site plan. C. FINDINGS OF FACT i 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, West Valley Thorough- bred Farms, pasture, and vacant. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for Urban development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural. 4. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. ' S. That the land in this area is xunsuitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 6. That the applicant has not demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the pro- posed rezone is not justified. The Committee notes there is no other com- mercial or business zoning generally between 9th Avenue and 35th Avenue on the Dishman -Mica Road. 7. That the proposed use is ihcompatible with existing uses in the area. 8. That the owners of adjacent lands and /or their representatives expressed disapproval of the proposed use. 9. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed zoning to not be in harmony with the general purpose and will be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 10. That the proposal is premature at this time; currently the vicinity is sur- rounded by Agricultural zoning. 1 'e No. ZE -37 -82 C. FINDINGS OF FACT (continued) 11. The project lies within the Flood Plain Area. Detailed documentation needs to be presented to.the Hearing Examiner Committee after consultation with engineers and surveyors pertaining to this sensitive area to provide suffi- cient proof that development can be satisfactorily undertaken without endangering the proposed development or adjacent properties. 12. That there would be an overall adverse impact on the nearby residential area due to increased traffic and the creation of additional access and egress points on the Dishman -Mica Road and 24th Avenue. E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Elberta Walker, for a zone reclassification as described in the application should be denied. Motion by Vote Skalstad Unanimous to Deny ( 2 - 0 ) Seconded by: Myers HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE ATTEST: WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Ai rector Date: _ _��..,`D._!? 2 OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Inter- office Communication Date_ November 17 - - -- —; 1982- - To Sook ane count Zoni r From Bob McCann, Plat Inspector Subject ZE -37 - I have begun review of the site plan for the above referenced zone change. Before I can proceed in that review, I need to be advised as to the boundaries of the proposal. The site plan as submitted addresses approximately one third of the area considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee in September of 1982. As you know the property in question is affected by a flood hazard zone. Any change in the boundary of the proposed zone change could influence com- ments made by this department. BM:laf t OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TO: Spokane County Planning Department FROM: County Engineer's Department V/ SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval.-Zone Change-- Numbec_ZZ_ 3 ' 7 - SZ ` /' Av Applicant's Name_A(�EK___ Section a9 Township,d5 N, Range4y_EWM The following "conditions of approval" for the above - referenced zone change are submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee for inclusion in the staff analysis and "findings and order" of the hearing scheduled Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit 1. Applicant shall dedicate p feet on p for right -of -way prior to any use of the property. 2. Applicant 'shall dedicate feet on for right -of -way and slope easements as necessary prior to any use of the property. 3. Applicant shalL dedicate a--foot radius on_ "" and prior to any use of the property. 4. Applicant shall dedicate feet on _ and afoot radius 'on .... and _ Eor right -of -way prior to any'use'of pr the .operty: G Access'permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the"- Spokane.Coucity Engineer. 6. Access permits and improvements to must be approved . y the Washington Department.of ,Transportation. yyC tr 7. Access permits and improvements to must be' approved;-, by the City'of - ------- - - - - -- :r, 4.,:•.: -,.• 8O (a) Applicant shall i mprove in in a manner, aonsistent,with Spokane' County TYPICAL roadway section No._ - L — minimum paving width - M+�/I jAl Std (b) Applicant shall improve tt` in a manner consi stent with 'Spokane. County TYPICAL roadway section No. _2_ _ minimum paving width fic,,.c5 S .:�rf.4wdqx,�l (c) Applicant shall improve_ in a manner consistent with Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. paving width (d) Applicant shall improve_ in a manner consistent with Spokane County TYPLCAL roadway Section No. -- _ _minimum paving width.------ (e) Other specific improvements: SG _To_._Dl_��f1Yrx 4 fC'C-A _ t25�1__J5 DY*O.h AtetA__ ® Applicant shall submit fur approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage, and access plans'prior to the Lssuance of a building permit on the property. 10 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on -e:ite sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. rA ©1 A parking pLdn and traffic cin:ulatinn plan shall h,: submitted and approved by the Spokane County Eugincer prior to the issuancu of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shalL be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. 12 The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. 13 To construct the road Lmprovements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. tt%%s AQP \ieS to lm rewernentT MICA 80Ad. �' S drsiyn/RT6d Fee D %$!i►i9aJ - 14 As an alternative method of constructing the road improvement stated herein, the appli- cant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required road improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. IlAlg ky'O'es tO 'Im�raveme/vT5 CIe_S1p%f,97Ld t 1ji2 DtSl, maw" - WC-A 1Zop d 15 The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as ap- proved by the Spokane County Engineer. 16 All required improvements shall conform to the current State Of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other applicable county standards and or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 17. Applicant shall file a petition for the vacation of prior to any use of the property. — '— - -- 18. Applicant shall construct a paved and delineated access approach(s) to meet the existing pavement on 19. Access to ___ _ _ Road shall be prohibited until such time as specifically authorized by the Spokane County Engineer. 20 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. 21 Chair thti Rec`uka} io JS o "�E vk % AL F ,OOd INSulramC e Prat V-43 1, 1 1 '-- d, 6 �'erua e 4 Si nee MCn Zone Ch 9,V/6 ; /4yyec ?e h et I 4t az a 2dt ZoY, e '�• !v't'ru.ctureS CWtS"Sr..•.cjecl W ;l'1,,.t,J - 't'G.� propoSC - -� �7ro�etT S/719// A, -16epe_ To R 3S fit• SetbA`t< gror,., Y�c re ded tcATt0,J As f ie/leY, O C _ I r,x / � i L.k - gf?,eq tsie 7AC;1ita'� �.t.,'tur� r`ly h'C o-f WAL' e oz ef c u�ecl Tc -C/. 741 15 Ta wR.� 66 Ncede�l �o/L rh£r ' 3 1 7 -/ &-/ r1iEO D`S7ie /9�T B� �3 TtiQZ ThE Alt9nimeiv� o{ .�U,� f1✓�ue qs t�'e /cTEd aiv n/b ro o3E�/ site Ian is r�o� Con/5I5TAn/T w:m P P Y<� El(isT'/7 yC/ vrn6� o� a4 uEv+ue omd Tt�e EKISt1n Yra;lreatl CrosSln / reV (t CJ t'e }vr, role 1 I � A�lFNUE E Ap�jicgN7' U >�E Ali �rt�e U�t 0.m L\ CCY15T c �•2ESG°ifr/ 9 R_ucT A N AcCES� d�lue tv t�lF p ro ose� � oNE c�iqug6 7 4;5 HCCE55 St,rall be. eons71zLAcTCd fJrom Ya \J - e- -A�-Le _io n Prc.Po Sm-Q A pe v ro i t moat bl'e obiaiN6d ;"vvm Tha Coc►uTy ra A CA Prior To Ce»STracT /o,v �& �6 Access ekviV� A {+;A r 6ACk tG rh& CC P.d. gN T,► ra s y ste m FP V ao vk G 5eeII Iqy Off ICE Of C0UNIY ENGINEERS SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IO: Spokane County Pl.inniny Oepart1hunt [ROM: Spokane County Enklineor F IM , RE: Conditions of Approval -Lone Change - - Number: Applicant's Name 1 K Sect ion.a� lownship_� N, Range _gcf_ The foIIuwing "condittuns u approval" for Lhe above- referenced zone change are sub- mitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee for .inclusion,in the staff analysis and "findings and order" of the hearing scheduled De pt — L 19�?2. l_J' Applicant shall dedicate feet on :5/ _AZ —r lf - for right -of -way prior to any use of the property. 2. Applicant shall dedicate feet on for right -of -way and slope easements as necessary prior to any use of the proper- ty. 3. Applicant shall dedicate a foot radius on and prior to any use of the property. 4. Applicant shall dedicate _ feet on _ . and'a foot radius on and for right way prior to any use of the property. Access permits shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit or any use of the property: 6. Access to Road shall be prohibited until such time as specifical y authorized by the Spokane County Engineer. 7. Access permits and improvements'to _ must be approved by the Washington Department of transportation. 8. Access permits and improvements to _ approved by the City of must be a *9 (A) Applicant shall improve S� j r��r��{ in a manner consistent with Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. _minimum paving width / Iicant *(B) App shall, unprove �_i� "' .in a manner consistent with S kk Okdne County lYPICAL roadway section No. — minimum paving width 794 y 5- rc /��ct *(C) Applicant shall improv, _ in a manner consistent with Spokane County iYPICAL roadway section No. --­---minimum paving width *(U) .Applicant shall improve a manner consistent with Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. ____!minimum paving width (E) Other specific improvements: + .Applicant shall submir r diqu oval I, the Spokane County Engineer road, drain- ' aye, dnd dct.1ss pldn', I�ri,,r to ttic rssoanc or a buiIdrny permit on the proper- ty. = E L' Ihr .�ppl ic,uit tihdl I .,. ;.1111 t. for appruvd1 by Lhe Jpokdnm (ounLy i.ny Uieer and the Jpokdnc County Hrdlt! I1u,Lr'1ct. d dvtdtled combined on -site sewdy(! syStem pldn and surface water dispus.rl ;jljn Tor the entire project prior to the issuance of and bu)Idtny permit on t.thc i,roherty. L/ A parking plan and trdttic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by lJ the Spokane County Eriginr•er prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, dnd arrangement of parking stalls shall be in. accordance with stan(:ard traffic enytneering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Ingineer, will be required for any portion of the project.' which is to be occupied or travelled by vehicles. V The word " applicdnt" %hdlI include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. 15. a . 18. 19� 1. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. '71,;5 . �w /.'ei yo D/slimnro -^Cl i /toad As an alternative method of constructing the road improvement stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County,Engineer, accomplish, the load ' improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project',; (CRP) to the extent of the required road improvement. Spokane County will not. ` participate in the cost of these improvements. /1P e5 r Rcr♦d, c The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplIshed as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Stand- ard Specifications for Rudd and Bridge Construction, and other appl,icable.`county standards,.and or adopted resolutions pertaining-to Road Standards,,;and Storawater' Management'in effect at the date of construction, ugless',otherw.ise:;approved by, the County Engineer. Applicant shall file a petition for the,vacation of prior to any use of the property. Applicant'shall construct a paved and delineated access,.agproach(s)'to the existing pavement onJJi Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drinage plan re'qufrementi Ve found' ` in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution ho_. 80AS92_as amended . > 4 . ' 4 Ry Tfn a'r yt�e enulnlcoNS o� 'TFv N,47/on/AL Mood •SNSUtaNtC:, ��� 1 Je ob� Stt„Ce ?he �co�vSEt� ZD,�lo" C�.+nrGr'; i5 4, ?ec7 by 2 }l00 0R "Aza2A �p clE 5trutl re5 CoNSV)r C_Tecy G✓ %ri „ � 1 TfiE f7rupo �7 / Adhere to a 35 ( T Setbr`ick -rrGm Th6 os- v7QrT4 �iN£ s9,L�Of the %c. ` c. ?,r of cuter feet / A5 ` 1 / NEea/�o/ 711 7N tu7, - & 7 of a�,v �9 � c1i5,'t/a rl Ssioui� if 6E cuhev %f7 & fl�” /✓ G/f�gfl?G! rl t S -i- ttr . ayJ,� SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION Date: / Application No: -r✓- _ Name of Applicant: L1 Z 1vALK�� Street Address of Applicant: �• $do�Z s��CYl1L= City: Stater . _ Zip Code: 9�/20� Tele. No. -3322 Name of Property Owner(s): Authorized Agent representing Owner , (if other than owner): Existing Zoning Classification: Date Existing Zone Classification Established: Existing Use of Property: VALG 7 Proposed Zone Classificatioi Proposed Use of Property: Legal Description of Property: r r :. Section: . 2q '' Township: 2S Range: ,. Source of Legal: Assessor's .Parcel No: (See tax statement) 2�S�i3 =,9058 Property Size: 7 174 14C1QES Frontage: /ADO Feet-- on':''/ j '/��/• Total amount of adjoining land .controlled by this owner `or, sp0risor:`' D.UL Street Address of the Property: If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application,` what is your interest in it? Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property: ; Section: . 2q '' Township: 2S Range: ,. Source of Legal: Assessor's .Parcel No: (See tax statement) 2�S�i3 =,9058 Property Size: 7 174 14C1QES Frontage: /ADO Feet-- on':''/ j '/��/• Total amount of adjoining land .controlled by this owner `or, sp0risor:`' D.UL Street Address of the Property: If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application,` what is your interest in it? Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property: ; ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: „ 1 . • What are the changed conditions of the site area, which you feel make tti{ proposal warranted? V — 2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacen,,. properties? nlAllngi Rev. 2/3/81 0 S� APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION-- continued This section of the application will provide the Planning Department's Staff with written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the agencies identified. Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporat- ed in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department. 1. COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our requirements ,for„ u 7 bmitta� of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied. Signature (Date 2. COUNTY UTILITIES OFFICE A preliminary consultation has been held requirements for submittal of this 'proposal The d signated water purveyor for this site Signature 3. WATER PURVEYOR (NAME) to discuss the proposal. our for rezone have eon satisfied is ♦♦ Y Date a) The proposal (is) � not) located within the boundary of our 'service area. S¢ ;r our Po�c�f�;'a� se:�iee ccfc . b) Satisfactory arrangements (have) (have not) been made to serve this proposal. " c) We are) (are not) able to serve this site with adequate water (Signature) TDa_tt 4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT . .- A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss.,Jhe proposal. Our requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been' satisfied. This proposal is located in Fire District # t' z �fga,�, Signature EsrnrrtEV riP*-Fww 17io PkR eNiLPj Date MvbT cow!)W'ro ALLcuR*1N_V IOU AYViC� PIR.>: mgcHt0cA(-, PULMeprj coi>LS A - n M* of Bw6tDrAL4 > vrr APPttcp 5. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT A liminary consult ion has been held to discuss the proposal. The applc nt ha b n o med of our requirement nd standards. Sig atur Da I, THE UNDE IGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST 'OF MY KNOW- LEDGE. 1 FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE SITE PRO- POSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY." ? tu ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHALF. x (Signed)� ....- ). z.U. Date: (Address) Phone: Zip: NOTARY Date: NOTARY SEAL: SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT Date: Rev. 2/3/81 . , S P O K A N E C O U N T Y E N G I N E E R - - -PREL 1 M I NARY C0NSULTAT I ON - -- p. - -: - --- - Project Name PROPOSAL Numher of Parcelb: Section DEVELOPER Name: _ ( k . ,_ or Address: — AGENT Phone: Business_ Home S-.,,) = Name: _ OWNER Address Phone: Business l Home Name: ?1' ENGINEER Address: Phone: Business -ice Home / B. PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION: — Date: - 7 By: -� Preliminary Conditions D s: a) Right -of- b) Curb c) Sidewalk d) Pave e) Approache f) Drainage g) State /Cit_ NOTE: T is proposa must comply with S okane . nt e u atlons or oa s, - proach and Draina i n New Construction; oar o ounty ommissioners eso u ion No. 80- 59 as amended. Conditions are preliminary and may change after field 'in- spection and review of County records. /ff.'c C. INSPECTION Date: / / By: T D. SPEC] Fee Paid: Planning E. FINAL RECEIPT Received From� For. ---- - - - - -- C BMANCE E WE — -- - -- eKCOa °•a�ly ROY on ELBERTA %VALKER 1924 E. 91•RAGUE 926 -3322 SPOKANE, WASUINGTON 99206 - 19 59J7 Date HOW PAID /G. r �- -- Dollars f�C_ , By, i 11'f' 194 pt / K I n : H 01 ��� t - . -- z. / o-t-- • - --E-, _l ,2. - .i• $ ,. o THE Rtrj ; I ® 3EAME•F/RsrNA7/ONAL BANK DISHMAN BRANCH / SPOKANE 1 0000 L L E L ti 1 : i 2 50000 241: L 70 2 L 40 31'' r-®-.._, m_•- �-••.-.. m-^:::.._, �-.... m„-;. �,•_- �_•-:.®.:-- .- ®r-- �r.o- :,•- :�m,,...��..:� • -rte �•: .,� S E C. 2 � I -I, -2 r", N R 4 4 F W M SCALE-- { = 400" 1 15T Av x LL -� I g n 3.s -• : \� -9- `( • �\Y 6 S 3I2 r S 4 3 2 /.; G, .' 3 $ i 7 6 S 4 32I A G •, Q �p Q l Q ,: k ry 3,z ro' 19 X20 7b 30 1 no. 263 -60' N.89 °02V ✓. NAP Ir ww ar 2 u 0 \p0 c 18T � � . 3 4 4 �� 7 -67 1 •. 3 L••• ..: .• 7 9 v • 0 lw M Cif t p 7 c s 4 3 2 1 17 N I 0 • I Z T V � �> �I / � 0) 8 V` i 30 129 ?I 32 t4 +h Ave. 4k -89° w. �E -Q' zig� Fic e ,•140.2 /6 C. 3 °00' T. 18!5.G, N L. 370 / v R. I'D l0 �P G G45� k32� S 0 Y ' O 2 N O l� N a CL o�. U U ' Z O Z X ° o o� 0, TE DESCRIPTION By 6 - /5 - 72 TH/S SECT to.ti REPRODUCED FROM L //vE/v TO MyLAR. �O 2 21 O 9 2 30' 30 O t9 cr 3 3N`29B SAO) � { a t �99 P r- • t i 9 , f r i i i 4 c o N • . _ _� ___. -� _ ___ _ �....___r _ __ _ -_...r --- -..__�� _ _� __��- _._ ___... E 1• r� (� }} ci 2 k.�•.:.:i.i,.M. :aa� iiL. -_, cL `'� w f ' f..+..�. s,e i. .t : , { t �99 P r- • t 9 , I i i i 4 c o N • . _ _� ___. -� _ ___ _ �....___r _ __ _ -_...r --- -..__�� _ _� __��- _._ ___... E 1• r� (� }} ci 2 k.�•.:.:i.i,.M. :aa� iiL. -_, cL `'� w f ' f..+..�. s,e i. .t : , C Te j:-,- C.P L—D. 'r)'pora�ry acct�.5� 0 thre vvas RAv' Lii7 e o 1�� r /j e. -s c/ C v. v e. vv'�� -S 4 2 F,� 74- '7"� e e :a o ng c u r v e to / C a d , a r id TO -5 a 70 f E� e- t, a c a 17 6 r C dl'-5 Afl�mr - 1/4'--OF SE 1/ 9 'T,"95 . r t h 5 ad - "30' E "I NEER. I;NCG 21N ON c t - / - /7 o c IV e,3"4�' k/ -i- h e S*4,Y'17 //f7C Of - th c /V Va CLAR FEIIIINCE.. p R(I., Nm'o -s n c,- th A/ �/Z c) -I' I ' 7 N ..ARGVNN Vr C. iv W -F -rt- 2 O M ' O Z _ W W S O H V H Q O aD OD ti OD N N N � OD N OD . . W W W W N