ZE-5-800
AGENDA, MAY 8, 1980
POKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor
North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane
1: 30 P.M. (continued)
B. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS (continued)
TELEPHONE NO.: 456 - 2205
12. ZN- 19 -80 SINGLE FAMILY TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE OR
LOCAL BUSINESS
(Generally located 400 feet west of Division
Street on the south side of Cascade Way,
extended east. Sections 19 -26 -43 and
30- 26 -43)
Proposed Use: Professional Office Park
Applicant: HUME (2.6 Acres)
13. ZS- 34 -80 AGRICULTURAL TO MINING, CLASS III
(Generally located east of
Highway N95 on the south side of Stutler Road.
Section 8- 23 -43)
Proposed Use: Crushing and Processing Rock.
Applicant: EUCON (40 Acres)
14. ZE- 5-I AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN
(Generally located north of 44th Avenue and
185 feet east of Hollow Street.
Section 33- 25 -44)
Proposed Use: 80 -Unit Condominium Complex.
Applicant: SEIPP (25 Acres)
5:00 P.M. - - - - - ADJOURNMENT
THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR THESE APPLICATIONS ARE ON FILE AND
AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S OFFICE (ZONING SECTION).
A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner
Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse environmental
impacts of the proposal.
The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197 -20- 330(2) provides that:
. In the event that the further investigations authorized by this
section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any
potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an E.I.S. shall
be prepared."
- 3 -
v5q-
Zc•ning Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of May 8, 1980 (contd.)
16) ZE -5 -80. Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban: Seipp
Location: Generally located north of 44th Avenue and 185 feet east of Hollow
Street. Section 33- 25 -44.
Proposal: Multiple family condominium complex. (7 Single Family Structures
and 66 Multiple Family Units)
Action: Approval. (Vote: 2 - 1)
(This item was continued from May 9, 1980 and completed on
May 12, 1980.)
If further information is desired, contact the Planning Department Office.
MMR:cmw
cc: Planning Commission
Mailing List
n
- 4 -
Ck
�• 3 e
3GTi I
Nu
4 37%H
8 C12
� .• • Q •1 TN ` Y V ;
33
i
ZE- 51--80
El l y 1
L� 1 �
.�,, 4 :. s,,� Iii . , •:..�].. . 1
0
Pecanr,+ on. ° ;4 ,� I £ � � �• . L 44TF1
ol
519 I
TERI r\
Wa S OOL
_
TM' AMEN tit
.• ...•. •6 Star
v 3
2 n c a
r o
� 4�r.r nV G' i �T Z N ,•� i� � IU �Q
a
I z
R 4 F RRET ', • ` W
cRp f ,
i 9
1 I q 4CN �
— --- L - - - -- 4 1000 �9
�4
I C
1
1 r
OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Date Aoril 22 , 19 p0
Inter - office Communication
To Zoning Administrator
From County Engineer
ZE 5-80
0 2 - 10' on 44th
016
018
019
1) Road across northern part of plot plan shall be revised so that it is the
major movement with the other road to the south intersecting into it. This
northern road shall be aliened to eliminate any sharp curves and shall
connect to Sundown Dr. on the west and Sands Road to the east.
2) A detailed intersection design shall be developed and approved by Spokane
County Engineer for the Northern (Load and Sands Rd. prior to construction.
Form 327 —C R.
OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Date April 29 , 79 -8( L
Inter- office Communication
To Zoning Administrator
From Cainty Ettgineer
Subject ZE 5-80 (Cont'd)
3) The road on the S.W. corner of the property shall be along the property line
adjacent to the existing house on this site or connected to 43rd Ave.. butno
not constructed along the west property line of this project.
4) Floors, including basement floors, shell not be constructed below elevation
2010, USC and GS datum, within this plat without special construction
standards as required by the "National Flood Insurance Program" Title 24,
Chapter X. Suhchapter'B, Part 1910.3 (C), paragraphs 3 and 4.
5) Area below the natural elevation 2010 USC and GS datum shall not be filled
so as to change the natural overflow and ponding that occurs from Plouf Creek.
Form 327 —C R
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 8, 1980
TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF
SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -5 -80
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT: FOREST MEADOWS PARTNERSHIP
WOLFLAND, INC., c/o Vince Seipp
STATUS OF APPLICANT: Owner
REQUESTED ZONING: Multiple Family Suburban
EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural (established 1967)
PROPOSED USE: 7 Single Family Structures
66 Mul Family Units
PROJECT LOCATION: Generally north of 44th Avenue and 185 feet east
of Hollow Street.
II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION
22.75
SITE SIZE: Approximately)9(5( Acres.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site is undeveloped and is currently covered
with grasses and scattered Pine trees. The site has
a considerable sloping terrain downward from 44th to
Plouf Creek. The Creek runs through the northern
portion of the property.
NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: The area is in transition from generally agricultural
and undeveloped land to platted lots from 14,000 -
24,000 square feet in area. Chester Cemetery lies
immediate southeast of the site. The Chester store
and other commercial uses are located at the Dishman-
Mica Road and Bowdish.
LAND USE: Site Undeveloped /Treed
North Railroad /Highway /FM Radio Towers
East Chester Cemetery
West Single family residential
South Single family residential
ZONING: North Agricultural and Local Business, established 1967
East Agricultural, established 1967
West Single Family Residential, established 1975
South Single Family Residential, established 1973
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Neighborhood
(contd.)
II. SITE P
NFORMATION (contd.)
NUMBER OF BUILDINGS EXISTING:
NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED
Total Square Feet
Percent of Coverage
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES
PARKING REQUIRED:
PROVIDED:
AVERAGE DENSITY:
III. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
IV
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE -5 -80
1 Barn (to be removed)
80 Condominium Units plus 1 Recreation Building
105,201 sq.ft.
90.8%
2 Stories
120 Spaces
160 Spaces
xk)b( Uni is /Acre
2.9
This parcel is the same ground of Forest Meadows 2nd Addition (1979), an
approved preliminary plat (45 lots) and zone change to Agricultural Suburban
or Single Family Residential. A limitation was placed by the Board of County
Commissioners that the establishment of lots below the 2010' elevation contour
be prohibited unless a current flood level study shows that the flooding level
is below this elevation whereupon building permits could be issued to the
newly established level. The proposed development will comply with this
condition.
KZUN FM radio tower lines extend into the northeast corner of the property
and lie approximately 1 foot underground.
The County Health District finds that:
1. This project lies over the Spokane Aquifer.
2. It is within Critical Water Supply Service Area No. 3, and within the
service area of Model Irrigation District. Groundwater resources appear
adequate to support development at this density.
3. The project is inside the 201 Sewer Study Area Zone No. 3, and inside the
Primary Sanitary Server Area recommended in the '208' Study. The method
of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities
pursuant to County Resolution 80 -0418 adopted March 24 1980. The
topography and soils in the area are generally suitable for use of
individual on -site sewage systems.
AGENCIES RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL
1. The site is located in Fire District N1.
2. Adequate water for fire protection, and distribution.of such water
is required. A plot plan showing fire protection water distribution
and access for emergency vehicles is required to be submitted for
approval prior to any land use.
0 - ( rnntd.)
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE -5 -£10
1V, AGCNCIES'RECONiiLi!UCD COh1D[T10 (coned,)
b) COUNTY ENGINEER
1. Applica'nL shall dedicate 10.(eCt on 44th Avenue for right of way and
slope'easements as necessary.`" .
2. Applicant, most be a will inq participant in any future Local Improve-
menL District (LID), Road Improvement District (RID), or County
Road Project (CRP). .
Note: Spokane County will not rLicipate in construction costs for
either the LID or RID. i
3. A detailed combined on -site sewage system and surface crater disposal
plan for the entire project shall he approved by the County Engineer
and the Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of any
building permit.
4. The design, location and arrangement; of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard Lraffic engineering practices. Any portion
of Lhe project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles shall
be maintained in hard surface paving.
5. The northerly road should connect to Sundown Drive for an all- weather
access to the project. A better highway design would suggest making
the E -W movement the major movement with the road to the south inter-
secting at a "T" unless some other method is used to control speeding
traffic.
G. A detailed intersection desicln shill be developed and approved by
Spokane County Engineer for the Northern Road and Sands Road prior
to construction.
7. The road on the southwest corner of the property shall be along the
property line adjacent to the existing house on this site or connected
to 43rd Avenue but not constructed along the 'west property line of.this
project.
B. Floors, including hasement floors, shall not be constructed below
elevation 2010', IISC and GS datum, within this plat without special
construction standards as required by the "National Flood Insurance
Program" Title 24, Chapter X, Subchapter a, Part 1910.3 (C),
paragraphs 3 and 4.
9. Area below the natural elevation 2010' USC and GS datum shall not
be filled so as to change the natural overflow and ponding that
occurs from Plouf Creek.
C) WATER PURVEYOR
I. Purveyor
is Washington Water
Power Company,
and
they will
supply the
with with
adequate water for
domestic fire
and
irrigation
uses.
ZONL RECLASSIFICATiON NO. YE -500
iV. AGENCIES RCCORALIU COPUiT100 MAW)
d) COUNTY HEALTH UISTRICT
1. Water service must be coordie'wted through the Director of Utilities,
Spokane County.'
2. WaLer.service shall, be by an existing public water supply.
3. The use of individual wells ;s noL authorized.
4. Sewage disposal method shall Was authorized by the Director of
ULiliLies, Spokane County.
5. The owner, his heirs, and successors shall agree to not protest legal
assessments and utility local improvement districts to provide
central sewerage service to'this lot.
G. A combined surface dater and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be
approved by the County Engineer and the health Officer prior to the
issuance of any building permit for this lot.
e) SEPA
That the provisions of Sf_PA's Na Lir.c of Action pursuant to 43,.,21C.080
ir
REW be accomplished by Lhe applan� within thirty (30) clays of
formal ncLion by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee as instructed
by the Planning UeparLmonL staff.
2. The request has proven to be environmentally non - significant.
Therefore, a final declaration of non - significance shall be signed
by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee.
f) ZONING
1. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for
maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator
shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to
release of building permits.
2. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance
within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee.
Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be
permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes:
Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of
the permitted zone. All.variations must conform to regulations set
forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent
of the development plans shall be maintained.
3. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not
extend over the property boundary.
- 4 - (contd.)
° ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE -5 -80
ti IV. AGENCIES RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS (contd.)
"f) ZONING (contd.)
4. That the natural top layer..sbil mantle of the floodway and flood
fringe not be appreciably destroyed during project execution.
5. The zone change shall not be valid until such time as the staff
receives a letter from the applicant withdrawing Forest Meadows_
Second Addition as a preliminary plat.
g) SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES
1. An on -site sewage system be allowed under the rules and regulations
of the Spokane County Health District.
2. The owner, his heirs and successors shall agree not to protest legal
assessments for any utility local improvement district to provide
central sewerage service to this property.
3. Water service shall be supplied by the Washington Water Power
Company in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for
Spokane County.
MiE
STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 8, 1980
TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF
SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -5 -80
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT: FOREST MEADOWS PARTNERSHIP
WOLFLAND, INC., c/o Vince Seipp
STATUS OF APPLICANT: Owner
REQUESTED ZONING: Multiple Family Suburban
EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural (established 1967)
PROPOSED USE: 80 -Unit Condominium
PROJECT LOCATION: Generally north of 44th Avenue and 185 feet east
of Hollow Street.
II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION
SITE SIZE: Approximately 25 Acres.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site is undeveloped and is currently covered
with grasses and scattered Pine trees. The site has
a considerable sloping terrain downward from 44th to
Plouf Creek. The Creek runs through the northern
portion of the property.
NEIGHBORHOOD•CHARACTER: The area is in transition from generally agricultural
and undeveloped land to platted lots from 14,000 -
24,000 square feet in area. Chester Cemetery lies
immediate southeast of the site. The Chester store
and other commercial uses are located at the Dishman-
Mica Road and Bowdish.
LAND USE: Site Undeveloped /Treed
North Railroad /Highway /FM Radio Towers
East Chester Cemetery
West Single family residential
South Single family residential
ZONING: North Agricultural and Local Business, established 1967
East Agricultural, established 1967
West Single Family Residential, established 1975
South Single Family Residential, established 1973
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Neighborhood
nl�- (contd.)
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE -5 -80
II
SITE PLAN INFORMATION (contd.)
NUMBER OF BUILDINGS EXISTING:
1 Barn (to be removed)
80 Condominium Units plus 1 Recreation Building
105,201 sq.ft.
90.8%
2 Stories
120 Spaces
160 Spaces
3.2 Units /Acre
NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED
Total Square Feet
Percent of Coverage
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES
PARKING REQUIRED:
PROVIDED:
AVERAGE DENSITY:
III. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
This parcel is the same ground of Forest Meadows 2nd Addition (1979), an
approved preliminary plat (45 lots) and zone change to Agricultural Suburban
or Single Family Residential. A limitation was placed by the Board of County
Commissioners that the establishment of lots below the 2010' elevation contour
be prohibited unless a current flood level study shows that the flooding level
is below this elevation whereupon building permits could be issued to the
newly established level. The proposed development will comply with this
condition.
KZUN FM radio tower lines extend into the northeast corner of the property
and lie approximately 1 foot underground.
The County Health District finds that:
1. This project lies over the Spokane Aquifer.
2. It is within Critical Water Supply Service Area No. 3, and within the
service area of Model Irrigation District. Groundwater resources appear
adequate to support development at this density.
3. The project is inside the 201 Sewer Study Area Zone No. 3, and inside the
Primary Sanitary Sewer Area recommended in the '208' Study. The method
of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities
pursuant to County Resolution 80 -0418 adopted March 24, 1980. The
topography and soils in the area are generally suitable for use of
individual on -site sewage systems.
IV. AGENCIES RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL
The site is located in Fire District f1.
2. Adequate water for fire protection, and distribution of such water
is required. A plot plan showing fire protection water distribution
and access for emergency vehicles is required to be submitted for
approval prior to any land use. �� `
l
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO
AGENCIES RECOMNENDED CONDITIONS
b) COUNTY ENGINEER
(contd.)
ZE -5 -80
1. Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet on 44th Avenue for right of way and
slope easements as necessary.
h �
v 3 h Applicant must be a willing participant in any future\Local Improve-
ment District (LID), Road Improvement District (RID), or County
r Road Project (CRP).
° Note Spokane County will not participate in construction costs for
either the LID or RID.
k 'N 3. A detailed combined on -site sewage system and surface water disposal
h ° ° u plan for the entire project shall be approved by the County Engineer
3 F a pp and the Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of any
v k) a\ building permit.
R
4 4. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Any portion
v t ` pr \ r of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles shall
be maintained in hard surface paving.
U o 5. Roa across no ern part o of planOR! be re iced so hat t is the r jor movemen r th the her road he south in ersec g into
it. T s norther road sh 1 be align eliminat any s p curves
and a cone t t Sund wn Dr. on th t and San Road t the
h o U j eas IT
% y 6. A detailed intersection design shall be developed and approved by
a 0 Spokane County Engineer for the Northern Road and Sands Road prior
to construction.
�7. The road on the southwest corner of the property shall be along the
property line adjacent to the existing house on this site or connected
to 43rd Avenue but not constructed along the west property line of this
U \ project.
L �8. Floors, including basement floors, shall not be constructed below
o t ti elevation 2010', USC and GS datum, within this plat without special
3 o ° construction standards as required by the "National Flood Insurance
v •t r, Program" Title 24, Chapter X, Subchapter B, Part 1910,3 (C),
paragraphs 3 and 4.
0
h y9. Area below the natural elevation 2010' USC and GS datum shall not
be filled so as to change the natural overflow and ponding that
occurs from Plouf Creek.
> c) WATER PURVEYOR
1. Purveyor is Washington Water Power Company, and they will supply the
with with adequate water for domestic fire,and irrigation uses.
= 94
(contd.)
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE -5 -80
IV. AGENCIES RECOMM CONDITIONS (contd.)
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1. Watdr service must be coordinated through the Director of Utilities,
Spokane County.
2. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply.
3. The use of individual wells is not authorized.
4. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
5. The owner, his heirs, and successors shall agree to not protest legal
assessments and utility local improvement districts to provide
central sewerage service to this lot.
G. A combined surface crater and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be
approved by,the County Engineer and the Health Officer prior to the
issuance of any building permit for this lot.
e) SEPA
1. That the provisions of SEPA's Notic of Action pursuant to 43.21C.080
RCM be accomplished by the applicant within thirty (30) days of
formal action by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee as instructed
by the Planning Department staff.
2. A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether the Hearing
Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse
environmental impacts of the proposal.
The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197 -20- 330(2) provides that:
In the event that the further investigations authorized by this
section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess
any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an E.I.S.
shall be prepared.''
f) ZONING
1. No residential buildings be located below the established flood level
line (2010').
2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for
maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator
shall he submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to
release of building permits.
3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance
within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee.
Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be
permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes:
Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the
permitted zone. All variations must conform to regufations set forth
in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the
development plans shall be maintained.
-
IT (contd.)
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE -5 -80
IV. AGENCIES RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS (contd.)
f) ZONING (contd.)
4. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend
over the property boundary.
g) SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES
I. An on -site sewage system be allowed under the rules and regulations
Of the Spokane County Health District,
2. The owner, his heirs and successors shall agree not to protest legal
assessments for any utility local improvement district to provide
central sewerage service to this property.
3. Water service shall be supplied by the Washington Water Power
Company in accordance with the Coordinated plater System Plan for
Spokane County.
- 77-A
ZONING WORKSHEET Form C
Application A
C I
d ocument will provide the Planning Department Staff with written" veirif ication th
at-
f
e -s ite'is legal description has been reviewed by the Engineering and;FPlaghjn g�;
1
epartmpnts w agree that the legal description is acceptable Y
JI hat thQ 'proposed development can meet the requirements of the Ccunty';Hea th
'I
PistrJ
'
[ct the'dounty E ngineers, the County Utilities Department;, County
-Mafshaland Water Purveyor.
.
.,"�i:'3) Th6Cadequate 'pr6visions,for the proposed development can be Or6y
.
I PS td ent al, commercial, industrial and mining uses,
An applicant T
,plIc.4rit 4s required to present a copr9f the'pro,posed DEVELQFK�P'N.V
..N.. this -yv rk s to ,qach;of the'listed agencies for:their review 'an
io
A;, W 21
to W proposal: can�meet minimum �tatql',' County and He4lth District : require7
Annljr-.Ant qhR anAn
PADIMP T'!�1. Co lin v Encitneer
It ,
A preliffitna ry' con e'ul ta tio'n e ting �ha a beer held wi th th'' Spokane, 4nty,,W
-ij e Co 9 ......
t� Off -4 'd t6e.pr000se "de�el6pmdnthas been i6vl� N'
State DQT.Revlew required: Ye , _N o ,
I I
lei i
, . t; , -, 2) hJ'Access'to b . 6 1 limited to P
T.
pl
3) il permit ccess pemit is required
41 z
41 11 4
'N
il n for.right–of-way isi required. ! io N" I
7
feet 4.4 ,4 L� c
Rood, Skreet '
I.'
q
,
b V foo
is requirqd.
P ,
n
and L:
Roa Street, Avenue.
c Slope easement is required <r
i
5) Drainage Plan is required, off-�s
Paving At is required. S feet on Per.' R6ad. -
j.
7) QurbAs req'uired, (along Road $Vpet-;'�,'Avenue .
8)
Sidewalk is re quired. (along Read SEieet,'Avenue.
L
777 -, — .r-
oi
:9) p 41
i
N
----------------
Applicant must be willing parffi;ipat6 in future LID/RIDI..' 1' 67,11
0) L
6gal description is acceptable as reviewed.
a`rce No
Comments: AM --5c-- e-
I
Signed
Date
0
1) Road across northern part of plot plan shall be revised so that it is the
major movement with the other road to the south intersecting into it.
This northern road shall be aliened to eliminate any sharp curves and shall
connect to Sundown Dr. on the west and Sands Road to the east.
2) A detailed intersection design shall be developed and approved by Spokane
County Engineer for the Northern Road and Sands Rd. prior to construction.
3) The road on the S.W. corner of the property shall be along the property
line adjacent to the existing house on this site or connected to 43rd Ave.,
but not constructed along the west property line of this project.
4) Floors, including basement floors, shall not be constructed below elevation
2010, USC and GS datum, within this plat without special construction
standards as required by the "National Flood Insurance Program" Title 24,
Chapter K, Subchapter B, Part 1910.3 (C), paragraphs 3 and 4.
5) Area below the natural elevation 2010 USC and GS datum shall not be filled
so as to change the natural overflow and ponding that occurs from Plouf Creek.
ZONING WORKSHEET -- continued - 2
ART II —to be completed by Spokane County Utilities Department
�:A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane County Utilities.D
�t!and' khg proposed development plans have been reviewed,
'The'.'proposed .development is s no located, in a public sewer service area+'', ;i'::'",,,: ,..•:::'..
operated •and, maintained by Spokane. County,
A storm
men
drainage plaq� not required for the proposal,. i
Comte
I t . .'. - -,, IA;V s r 'par,i,, 1 1 1 777
'; o-t ; ,,�y,. r,�4 :,;. 'kYI1G�'.,`. —n rr _ r,. ,t1, + I
.v`el` : i ear ,
Jl
,.).. ;r ,1 r'•'• 7,�. h "iJ'f ' �: 4'i "'ai. ' ".1,' :_a: •. •':•,�.; =, ;ki::• - :i "F -' �d'`'[i'.:. :.,. `�r
it i;r. : +': ,i ;J k- •}:4 F'Y.::4". r "rr ="t.
, .,n 'f �1I ,i ..Y��_ : -t l.i ,�. ,p.)I' - :�•�. i 4f CI Y. '!.Y tfi R i, );;' G u r >i -
' if ,'',��Y' e . I � a • J •, �'.y'.pj'rili •.'.,•,.. — •. � 4, , Y�i :� : ,. r. -
. t •�N '1 rr.^TT, art.: rA
• _ur_yii; i1•: t.q S.kl.,��.ni �,•'.
.�' >; ', ,�. ,E nn at` <;'r
-`i,l: ;1.; y,�ld I'. ,I ..1.r .Yr .a• - �'A �1 �.k. ti . �;[,s ;d' .,�,t �,,l ,.a
1
q•r:�.i' Y(i`:''.E "� � '�. "'�' ..yyn, r. �`f ^. .Ird.
' "i,• ,I'; •I, rl ,:16r'J I'.i �i, ,';L -.:.i :1:• vb`i• .,y�.
,,, j y .
;r',:� � T..IZLk4� �II �
}IIl IbY'g��kgLIS
r .r.o. M•. :5 rW:' ✓.., .+: .,..._ ,+, ,�y — +,�,.�,y'• � .: f�.. :i� r -Ind;; Cl :;w; "i'.ri. i.. >•
'+�� ,i' ,•1.v ':I „Hr {.A {.:c'.,I y95*r:. 'r.;', ''a ^'4!t "4,t1. g � 'n�'s.� 'ii _ ,:,1,. ' ,S'. ' -� {. ��i
::
it
t.
u
yr
� Lei (j
V
^ 'f,w
r ' t.
°n ¢• w
x, d
• J.
i
P,; I
} r 1
t ”- 1 .,r 1�.1 -.: . ,.: �\ y i; . a. r' ,: ij:i:�P :.r ri t` ii'•1'r. .rr 51:. :'i:
., �, Yt,'
T. 1� ° s The °•propo,sed,development,la iocated with the
; �
,d ist f.` rict :b6undac'ie�
f
�l�'
2)' Saaf�s #actory agiTnenf /drr anceme(}G,has/ has not been'made.to se{ve
1 ,this
r r. ;pQ+. "';' y`_ }, ;• �. Jti; �. T .
I' P +y i,y
ro osal':'F;; `.±« '4a . �jrr ";S / i` :,i:• "51 % • ,'t'�4� -;y.`` .:$•:r.;i'v'i.
.If •, )' � r, . � t C, e;!.,' � � .� r A%'.:1," 1 f . .
^yr.t�.p� tt..:: :g „:.r . p ap: '' +' V;'. g"'.1. '; }... .!�:; :'. V.i? : ::, !f:.i� 'u'�( : ,
r�'i+iF;;,�. .:I :' -�Q'i' ;'} _'i. •'l. ';'_F. - ?' +'`. vi:: "ir•2'.r.•
', .j'.I:.A g ii�'e •'ti7i� ✓:e �I
Y.A. .dif. •r. i; ,�' +:`i
''•!L, ,;,,.. QQ � W
i¢ elri -to s uP�ly with adaqu�te,,Potahle.;':
.¢ , � , Y;'dl?'gE::Cri 7 ..y ,Z � y .. << ., (:Y'!." `'•:`;r6�.r - r, V� , :y:::4 •'x��: +:I: e?, ^'li
'I p t 'I! .':,... olr:i ;44' :':p {r� °!x r' ” \r, (.: ;i:; '`r, :f:L,i ry,; to p .y: I 7
N • q �•
,.1r :•�;,; ( ,,. ..�I,i * -t., ?. ;Sr .b6(Tli+ j I` %1.
YWM ': ^..•
+ " ,b, ;
;`ry i ✓. .,�1j .S. '} 'x l' :'fh .r� ~,'? �. I. r ..'r;.'::.
♦ :i�. qri; •pauipCl dNv, 1 1:.R „ _':P ?.i ".`g }.�` �' ' lsb °:'� .ri . ;.{:..
re;ii6,V- ie "to supplq.thig development with adequateFwd•'for
.+.M• f 4i .a l
V'r _4
{ Q W�'`' ' tL .', 4,• ;.,. iR ,.1 `.i. ".'u : 7 •�.�il , " r
ia�ir ig, a, .In,.�r,. .i;l�ll rii . �. i�1: e :�. i r l ..'i ll
"' • ; ' •'� ' i'' 1', r 4p S,c , 1c, ,
Pri ` r1�C� c
;!r,Wa fi r:.' urve Qr' " publ p . vate communit ,
i Y
private, other
6) W et'sstem is /is hot
under State Utilities )urisdictionf {'
7) IndcaCe, 'size:,.of main) for hook up: inches
. , a3
t
7,11: ?:', liq }A; •YI`i;rs�,;Iy,', : r�. '$.. d,' r� �?i.: lr , ,. r ?' ,�f. �, +. "q5:•: '''R, +; n ✓.q �,L :'
It
r q
r.
, };j.e .., r( '.: 'tu�l, '.. �i::Lfr i {•�°Ri }�� - 1-�r ' ,ili' :r`r':.: "
8) , DiO4, - ,e'to main -
.. ?
feeE;1.'._
r " t w •lr, „ ^. �.•: .�A..; �:...::I . , ' t S, 1i. ;JA9?.''r lri•r r:
,r_ r� Y.' ':1f:,'-
ed A
j) rr,f >Ind watei supply will be developed with /without fire pintectionr
1 r ,
;�,. , "'t tl 1 "capaiiilikies a ", is I r r: :: ;� r; . ; • ; I !� .t. 4 :t,:
ff',
rt >
it
i ` t ., L Fp I !, ',, ° t' K6't d .. I F' i r r , 1 ' •, ,. : t' '
•'if dm,q:'A
..... rr a .. .,x.. r. SrA' :,•C -. ,. e... e .. r , ., a r e..... . ..
OFFICE OF COUNTY UTILITIES DEPT.
Spokane, Wash.
Date: �F ,19 0®
TO: I Ic \ U.�1
FROM: IRARY' NFLsQAI ,F _, - -g6
SUBJECT: Stan drainage language for the dedication on — F 7,P ' - i`"I CNn nwl '
1. The owners of Lots _,_,_, &of Block and lots _,_,_, &_ of block _shall be held
responsible for obstructing and artifically collecting or discharging the natural
or manmade drainage flow across or adjacent to their property.
2. The property owner or his representative shall inform each suceeding purchaser
of all drainage easements on the property and his responsibility for maintaining
drainage facilities within said easements.
3. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage
courses on private lots within drainage easements or flood plain areas nor the
responsibility for any drainage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse
condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and /or maintenance
of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property.
Floors, including basement floors, shall not be constructed below elevation r7-.Q/0
USC and CS datum, within Sot- s— ,_, —, B +o- _, an d— I,ot- s 9 — s —, —`�
- block —_ e+ this plat without special construction standards as required by the
"National Flood Insurance Program" Title 24, Chapter X, Subchapter B, Part 1910.3
(C), paragraphs 3 and 4.
5. An approved lot grading plan exists for lots ,& Block lots ,_,_, &_,
block_ Grading must conform to said plan on file in the County Engineer's
Office.
6. Spokane County shall not be held responsible to maintain ingress or egress across
the flood plain area.
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION
File No.ZE -5 -80
This matter having come before the Hearing Ewa miner Committee on
May 12 1980, and the members of the Committee present being
Chairman, Kenneth Kennedy and Ted McCoury
n's nyx
John Culler
B. PROPOSAL
Forest Meadows Partnership
The sponsor, Wolfland, Inc. c/o V. Seipp is requesting approval of a 3lsaattpexxS
coockickk=V zone reclassification, File No. ZE -5 -80 Agricultural
to'• iultiple Family Suburban , for the purpose of developing awdx3NxkwxxH ®md ®mzwzamx
a multiple family condominium complex.
C. F INDINGS OF FACT
1. That the existing land use i,n the area is residential, cemetery, commercial and
undeveloped.
2. That the Comprehensive'Plan designates this area as appropriate for
residential
development.
3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is
iculturaI
4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act)
have been complied with.
5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda item
have been fulfilled.
6. That the land in this area is suitable /9K94 MKX6T6 for the proposed use, or
uses within the proposed Zone Classification.
7. That the applicant hasp4XtC4cxY4 demonstrated that conditions have
substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly,
the proposed rezone is /X1x justified.
File No. ZE -5 -80
9
10.
That the proposed - use is compatible /i with existing uses in the
area
That the owners of adjacent lands expressed ft9cYK9KAXppXMi3 /disapproval/
I)W of the proposed use.
The Hearing Examiner Committee finds /cQaxAnakxRixot the proposed use to be
in harmony with the general purpose and 'will not be otherwise detrimental
to the public health, safety, and welfare.
The following are additional findings.of fact considered by the Hearing
Examiner Committee:
- That the proposed use will provide a good buffer for the area as well as
utilize the flood plain area.
That economic conditions have cha
substantially to promote this type
D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL
(List here all conditions noted in Staff Analysis)
E. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the
application of Forest Meadows Partnership - Wolfland, Inc.,c /o V. Seipp for a
ixMxmgnxofxE &wjdA;t /zone reclassification as described in the application should
be approved /d=w ,Qck
-2-
Motion by: Kennedy Seconded by:
Vote: Approved 2 - 1
File No. ZE -5 -80
McCoury
HEA " EXAMINER COMMITTEE
rman
ATTEST:
JAMES L. MANSON
Acting Planning Director
BY
40
3
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
So 10 88 SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF ZONE ) FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION,
RECLASSIFICATION, ZE -5 -80, AND CONDITIONS
AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE )
FAMILY SUBURBAN )
THIS MATTER, Being the consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners of Spokane County, hereinafter referred to, as the "Board" of an
appeal of the Spokane County Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Decision of
May 12, 1980, approving the zone reclassification, ZE -5 -80, Agricultural to
Multiple Family Suburban for the purpose of developing a multiple family
condominium complex, hereinafter referred to as the "Proposal ", and the Board
of County Commissioners of Spokane County having held a public hearing on July 7,
1980, and having fully considered all testimony presented thereat, and further
having personally acquainted themselves with the site and vicinity in question,
and having rendered a decision on the 4th day of August, 1980, denying said
proposal, does hereby make the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the proposal is located on the north side of 44th
Avenue, east of Hollow Street.
2. That the proposal consists of a Multiple Family Suburban
rezone for 7 single family and 66 multiple family dwelling units.
3. That the approved Spokane County Comprehensive Plan
indicates residential usage of the area encompassed by the proposal.
4. That the provisions of RCW Chapter 43.21C, (State
Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with.
5. That the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee held
a public hearing on May 12, 1980, concerning the proposal, subsequent to which by
Findings of Fact, Decision, and Order dated May 15, 1980, they approved the
proposal subject to certain conditions.
6. That the existing land uses in the area of proposal
include residences, cemetery, commercial and undeveloped.
7. That the proposal is not compatible with existing uses
in the area.
8. That the proposal is detrimental or otherwise harmful
to the public health, safety and welfare.
9. That the applicant has not demonstrated changed conditions
since the original zone change warranting a zone change from Agricultural to
Multiple 'Family Suburban.
s
10. That the proposal is not totally consistent with the
surrounding land use classifications.
(contd.)
R
I
so 1088
Findings of Fact, Decision, and Conditions (contd.)
ZE -5 -80
11. That the Board finds that the proposal is located within
the recorded water service area of Washington Water Power and that the District
indicates there is an adequate system capacity, and that they are desirous of
serving the proposal for domestic, fire and irrigation purposes.
12. That the proposal is situated within the recorded fire
service area of Fire District No. 1.
13. That the proposal lies within the boundaries of Central
Valley School District.
14. That the proper legal requirements for advertising of
the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County have been
met.
15: That on the 4th day of August, 1980, the Board of County
Commissioners of Spokane County at a regular meeting did deny the proposal, subject
to certain conditions.
16. The United States Geological Survey Flood Hazard Study
indicates that a portion of this site lies within a potential flood area.
17. The Board of County Commissioners approved Forest
Meadows Second Addition (PE- 1290 -79) for this site on „uly 23, 1979. The proposed
density of the subdivision is a valid approval for the periphery of a flood plain
area.
18. The R -1 density at which PE- 1290 -79 was approved is valid,
and that the need to increase the density as proposed by this application not
been demonstrated.
19. The type of residential land use in the vicinity of this
proposal is predominantly single family.
20. The density proposed by this project is not compatible
with existing development in the area surrounding the project site.
21. Traffic generated by this proposal will compound the
existing traffic congestion in this area.
22. Existing level of congestion on Sands, Bowdish and the
Dishman -Mica Highway dictates that an additional access to the southeast corner
of the Ponderosa is needed.
'23. Until such time as additional access to the southeast
corner of the Ponderosa area is developed, large scale development is not
appropriate in this vicinity.
24. The Dishman -Mica Highway and the Union Pacific Railroad
provide a natural boundary for the Ponderosa area. This boundary serves as a
barrier for single family residential development.
From the foregoing Findings, the Board approves the appeal
and reverses the approval of the Hearing Examiner Committee, thereby DENYING the
proposal.
- 2 -
(contd.)
!r Q .
80 loss
Findings of Fact, Decision, and Conditions' (contd.)
ZE -5 -80
DATEDI Thi s day of _ SEP (1.2 n , 1980.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
JERRY C. KOPET, CHMN.
HARRY M.LARNED
RAY W.CHRISTENSEN
ATTEST:
By:
- 3 -
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
80 10138 SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF ZONE ) FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION,
RECLASSIFICATION, ZE -5 -80, AND CONDITIONS
AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE )
FAMILY SUBURBAN )
THIS MATTER, Being the consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners of Spokane County, hereinafter referred to as the "Board" of an
appeal of the Spokane County Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Decision of
May 12, 1980, approving the zone reclassification, ZE -5 -80, Agricultural to
Multiple Family Suburban for the purpose of developing a multiple family
condominium complex, hereinafter referred to as the "Proposal ", and the Board
of County Commissioners of Spokane County having held a public hearing on July 7,
1980, and having fully considered all testimony presented thereat, and further
having personally acquainted themselves with the site and vicinity in question,
and having rendered a decision on the 4th day of August, 1980, denying said
proposal, does hereby make the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the proposal is located on the north side of 44th
Avenue, east of Hollow Street.
2. That the proposal consists of a Multiple Family Suburban
rezone for 7 single family and 66 multiple family dwelling units.
3. That the approved Spokane County Comprehensive Plan
indicates residential usage of the area encompassed by the proposal.
4. That the provisions of RCW Chapter 43.21C, (State
Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with.
5. That the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee held
a public hearing on May 12, 1980, concerning the proposal, subsequent to which by
Findings of Fact, Decision, and Order dated May 15, 1980, they approved the
proposal subject to certain conditions.
6. That the existing land uses in the area of proposal
include residences, cemetery, commercial and undeveloped.
7. That the proposal is not compatible with existing uses
in the area.
8. That the proposal is detrimental or otherwise harmful
to the public health, safety and welfare.
i
9. That the applicant has not demonstrated changed conditions
since the original zone change warranting a zone change from Agricultural to
Multiple Family Suburban.
10. That the proposal is not totally consistent with the
surrounding land use classifications.
-1-
(contd.)
r
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
80 10138 SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF ZONE ) FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION,
RECLASSIFICATION, ZE -5 -80, AND CONDITIONS
AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE )
FAMILY SUBURBAN )
THIS MATTER, Being the consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners of Spokane County, hereinafter referred to as the "Board" of an
appeal of the Spokane County Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Decision of
May 12, 1980, approving the zone reclassification, ZE -5 -80, Agricultural to
Multiple Family Suburban for the purpose of developing a multiple family
condominium complex, hereinafter referred to as the "Proposal ", and the Board
of County Commissioners of Spokane County having held a public hearing on July 7,
1980, and having fully considered all testimony presented thereat, and further
having personally acquainted themselves with the site and vicinity in question,
and having rendered a decision on the 4th day of August, 1980, denying said
proposal, does hereby make the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the proposal is located on the north side of 44th
Avenue, east of Hollow Street.
2. That the proposal consists of a Multiple Family Suburban
rezone for 7 single family and 66 multiple family dwelling units.
3. That the approved Spokane County Comprehensive Plan
indicates residential usage of the area encompassed by the proposal.
4. That the provisions of RCW Chapter 43.21C, (State
Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with.
5. That the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee held
a public hearing on May 12, 1980, concerning the proposal, subsequent to which by
Findings of Fact, Decision, and Order dated May 15, 1980, they approved the
proposal subject to certain conditions.
6. That the existing land uses in the area of proposal
include residences, cemetery, commercial and undeveloped.
7. That the proposal is not compatible with existing uses
in the area.
8. That the proposal is detrimental or otherwise harmful
to the public health, safety and welfare.
i
9. That the applicant has not demonstrated changed conditions
since the original zone change warranting a zone change from Agricultural to
Multiple Family Suburban.
10. That the proposal is not totally consistent with the
surrounding land use classifications.
-1-
(contd.)
.J 1.
Findings of Fact, Decision, and Conditions (contd.)
ZE -5 -80
11. That the Board finds that the proposal is located within
the recorded water service area of Washington Water Power and that the District
indicates there is an adequate system capacity, and that they are desirous of
serving the proposal for domestic, fire and irrigation purposes.
12. That the proposal is situated within the recorded fire
service area of Fire District No. 1.
13. That the proposal lies within the boundaries of Central
Valley School District.
14. That the proper legal requirements for advertising of
the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County have been
met.
15. That on the 4th day of August, 1980, the Board of County
Commissioners of Spokane County at a regular meeting did deny the proposal, subject
to certain conditions.
16. The United States Geological Survey Flood Hazard Study
indicates that a portion of this site lies within a potential flood area.
17. The Board of County Commissioners approved Forest
Meadows Second Addition (PE- 1290 -79) for this site on July 23, 1979. The proposed
density of the subdivision is a valid approval for the periphery of a flood plain
area.
18. The R -1 density at which PE- 1290 -79 was approved is valid,
and that the need to increase the density as proposed by this application has not
been demonstrated.
19. The type of residential land use in the vicinity of this
proposal is predominantly single family.
20. The density proposed by this project is not compatible
with existing development in the area surrounding the project site.
21. Traffic generated by this proposal will compound the
existing traffic congestion in this area.
22. Existing level of congestion on Sands, Bowdish and the
Dishman -Mica Highway dictates that an additional access to the southeast corner
of the Ponderosa is needed.
23. Until such time as additional access to the southeast
corner of the Ponderosa area is developed, large scale development is not
appropriate in this vicinity.
24. The Dishman -Mica Highway and the Union Pacific Railroad
provide a natural boundary for the Ponderosa area. This boundary serves as a
barrier for single family residential development.
From the foregoing Findings, the Board approves the appeal
and reverses the approval of the Hearing Examiner Committee, .thereby DENYING the
proposal.
- 2 -
(contd.)
r
-
80 1088
Findings of Fact, Decision, and Conditions (contd.)
ZE -5 -80
DATED This _ day of
SEP 0 21980 , 1980.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ATTEST:
VE
Cl
By:
JERRY C. KOPET, CHMN.
HARRY M.LARNED
Y CHRISTENSEN
W. OHLAND
f the Boa
ty
- 3 -
I -
DI SEC35 T25N
-� c- -1 `^= 4o6
.h
e OFFICIAL PLAT
• a a . W � � A
A.P.ScOTT- ENG1NUB :R- ' COUi`iTY
BY _----- - - - - -- — W
31ST' � dfd: It �I c I �) • - -- - - - - - --
cr
Z' z W 3 Ld
N 0 6 I U) io x I CL
27 �0 3o I/o l I {o I I 0 = CL
_ _
32N - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - -- - -- - - - -- - _ _ - 2 No I I �z I I 9 _3'7�f- = �I '
30' r 2
.
30' `C' 4 5 11 112 . 80 a 7 6 S 4 3 ''(�I' t .L. J9 • JO a
- rz 1 4
1
1 BLK l 3 U 6 10 13 9 2 D_r4 �•
z 7 _ 3 RD VE. E r , N ,42 I ii o4 - 69
W •J !2 a /0 9
Z 2 I o T 8 9J a l4 2 �
�•t, y o j9. $�! 33rd•
07
—_ •.. t :,,: • i..J 4 , I 4 ' > J3 JG
O M1 �. � ova O f ti I •�• 3 • 14 ' Js c ,7 IS /s 20 z, zz z3 zvZ 0 s I
,r ♦ � }�n .• • 5 • 4 3 2 3
��• T... I 34 _N A E
��t11�t �i 1 • 1 2 3 4 5 6 m BL �o I T3
.n u n u C I 17 2 6 T 8 qL
C]Q� U O I ��/ T .••. 0 / 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 •• iro 3 6x 16 h IOF a BL 5 N
(o • a.
I \ 15 4 uo. 96 nJ .. �:.. N 5° b _ I z m
L X BLlC 9 Q 14 g�'� 1 2 g� II c 4 ..3. 35 . "H v o roN Q - I IZn 16- r. 3 3 r L9 4 -,� . .
• (f) •,� Q ! I 0 X �• T a5 b
3
`,. I a 2>
to m 13 s Z •IOBL 44
12�
0
C '• 2
�` 1 16 15 II 12 T J �9 5J m3 2/ z : j ..:a ` e .;y,•:. 2so' �. 5 �� :a 5 g
a 1 14 U u C9 14' :, > I I r 's 6 h O+ 3
Q 13 12 II IO 9 B 8 7 6 o ro
f P 1 35 th 15 r z4 ssT:, A`�� S
{k ' 35th T 5 0 T 5
Op '.:5 1 3e 7 a 1
4 � No. 2 6_g vC 32 -goo• fa Z 1 :3 1 \ • ,
Ir
K 5 �I 2 3 4 5 6 7 a s 4 < - t 1 - .• • r�
8 K B K 7 I .: L.l. J� zo 0 3 4 R I� 9 ,� =z �: ,c s ' \••� f \•.\9 Q I O
ipl. z 1 0i ° 3 . I I J° 3 • . z: • i \0 0 B
�<t W H d ,oQ 8. C?;;'
0
- 5 4+ �.loc ` ° ?; •�"' il — 36r. AVE• .. �• .
.2481 2N i I n', zo ([� ex • :�; \: • Ri,l '
J 4 p Ef� • ; a k a 3 6 av i i — "'•• • �F' 3 yI
�P4ec`�l` r 5 4 3 2 lo' 1 .: e ;'3 2 I. rrp' I i /3 4 \t • •• •• \ Z
1 .6 O r`�e e+ r (/ "fix h ar :l� Q ``i c A';. fi/ �6 I LR; n 3 � \ 1 3 B6 p�
0 +/" rl �;� �� / (9v N 2 • 3 4 F�11 6 N G1i•:u "li -).4 •5 ; I ti
/ 1 ' 'O ;. .: , (• 7•t' 5 I� •l4 No . L41/ gn t� •N J 2 ^ ;.3 4 \ 0 4
� mm .. o o B \V
B/ °� fi 37 .H TY - 37 > H a s. i ��! r 7
7 1 21!' ' y 1 f_ . I ''3. C•f p ?s• Al I 30 -3 B 3
\ N 3 4 5 6 d i! 1 1 = 4
q _ 3 Q
ti G / ' ,..: r•: v 16 /7 - >, Y -C I Sewage i
\ ,� .9 4 Lt. /9 D ' Treatment
� 00 r
38TH k2 1 II cj Facility
2 cn so 6 /3 I
;1 z5
0 4
5 J
It 78.3
i n
N \ PIKE ZS34 ,Q. V
Q .
p
o
• ti . , ooh; � � 1 I
m 0)� v �j % 11 1 30 I I
h / �/v�' /�
)3
�0
+
G .'lI I
,2 3 4 5 6 _ i ---- _ - - - -- W
•{.: ►..:. 1 ill tLd
A/{ .9 5 } ( '4 + l 5 I 6 .. �\ , • 5
R . L I'n�8� %t' � 111 P:" I �'' 1 � � • I
m a a 5 Jn to I K a 7 I �i Cra.JSS' l 5ey 4 I at3ii 6 9 v
to
3 ,i. � n1 I
N89 :a12G.,E 4�'. \u. r -
rL ° U a P /off _ O • - . --
-) � /.. � .. �'.+ p� /aa1 -C�
DoN1 RA 1'> �•!' I 2J 5 ~ �r� /i/ o \.CJ2�. +.;:�
oq• 5°` ri N Fa>- r'.• 0 - `0 /cf -v /�yy ~
'
'YI I y ,.� " •� I "m ' 4PNLD GT 5 Q O e ,'. { ? u
2 m I $ / s �' r+ B I �FJ r 19
i
.n `44, BL K - a S ` ^ BT •d. 6 (old# l¢4l9 j x• / ��` '� �'
.; � S b , 6 I \ � 5� •� I m w •F 4 l 0 l �a
¢ 9 (y I G
r
.:� 1 3 43 RD. it 12�Q K6 I v I� 1 0,
? 4 RD Av .-\
DAR 6 , - - CHESTER I -o�
3 ' CEMETERY I �
{. ?:' 1 1Y ,:J�•�• • t' < Q ES r o J5 ,, 01
4 y 2 7 S7 , l0 2 3 4 ?' 1 I Z 3e �,�� 2 F' ` '1 (!--
•y ^ ,/ 5 6 (1, 'm
8 _ j y . 2 3 43 t
44 T/Yg ------ - - --�� - - -- _ - -- -- - --- -- - -A - - R' .4 D �, t - q _ .4 h F °X 0 Q fo i v
_ `_ t'
4p .- ..3s7.ss- /�• -+ ,� ` °�' 6 3 6 2 • + +O 6 p R c tc. 2 7 r
1 O -
/ %4n PE_ ;aN �V�� - S66 T1�.4�/Er2SE PLATQ k0 47
y 1 4113
OAT �— - - - - - -- - D ^ - /0/
6 - /S -;� r-/is sECr /Ow- R FR LIV EN TO 1 viyLgR
12_Z I' - 1? C - --
— I
NO TE
MM1MW 4 DE SiGA/A E 5 ° V�i GAT/7N"
1 R