ZE-37-80AGENDA, JUNE 12,1980
SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor
North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane
(Continued from page #1)
5
0
ZE- 64 -80 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO LOCAL BUSINESS
(Generally located 170 feet east of Pines Road on
Maxwell Avenue and 70 feet north of Maxwell Avenue on
east side of Pines Road. Section 15- 25 -44)
Proposed Use: Ceramic Shop
Site Size: .5 Acres
Applicant: JAMES GUNBY
East 11204 - 23rd Avenue
2 y P
40
the
ZE- 69 -80 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL
(Generally located 350 feet south of Appleway Avenue on
the west side of Greenacres Road. Section 18- 25 -45)
Proposed Use: Possible Expansion of Adjoining Business
Site Size: 1.8 Acres
Applicant: WILLARD HEWSON
East 712 - 19th Avenue
7. ZE- 37 -80
RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME TO COMMERCIAL, 130
(Generally located at the southwest corner of the
Dishman -Mica Road and Hatherly Circle. Section 33- 25 -44)
Proposed Use: Trucking Dispatch Office
Site Size: .15 Acres
Applicants: DONALD A. and PEARL -P. MILES
East 14816 - 12th Avenue, Veradale
8. ZE- 65 -80 AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN
(Generally located at the northeast corner of Fifth Avenue
and Havana Street. Section 23- 25 -43)
Proposed Use: 43 -Unit Apartment Complex for the Elderly.
Site Size: 1.98 Acres
Applicant: GRANT GROESBECK
North 909 Pines Road
9. ZS- 60 -80 AGRICULTURAL TO LOCAL BUSINESS
(Generally located north of 55th Avenue and west of the
Palouse Highway. Section 3- 24 -43)
Proposed Use: Offices and Local Business Uses
Site Size: 5.6 Acres
Applicant: COEUR D'ALENE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Box 8118, Spokane, WA
10. ZW- 58 -80 AGRICULTURAL TO MANUFACTURING
(Generally located at the southeast corner of Hayford and
Thorpe Roads. Section 6- 24 -42)
Proposed Use: Manufacturing
Site Size: 7.83 Acres
Applicant: WILSON TOOL AND MANUFACTURING
- East 5920 Broadway Avenue (rnntri
,5_4
TELEPHONE NO.: 456 - 2205
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -37 -80
SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued)
i
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Neighborhood
NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: 1
NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED: 0
Total Square Feet Approximately
Percent of Coverage 12.5%
1344g Approximate total fir— 950
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES: 1 story
PARKING REQUIRED: 2 spaces
PROVIDED: 7 spaces
L
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
836 sq. ft.
This request is to bring on existing use into conformity with the Spokane
County Zoning Ordinance. A truck dispatch office is not allowed in the
Residential Mobile Home Zone. If the Hearing Examiner Committee should
grant approval of this request, the use would no longer be in violation.
AGENCIES RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL
1. The site is located in Fire District #1.
2. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water
shall be required for this project. A plot plan showing water
distribution and emergency vehicle access is required -for
approval prior to any land development or use.
b) COUNTY ENGINEER
1. Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet on Dishman Mica Road and a 20
foot radius on Dishman Mica & Hatherly Circle.
2. Applicant shall construct paved and delineated approaches to
meet existing pavement.
3. Applicant must be a willing participant in any future Local
Improvement District (LID), Road Improvement District (RID), or
County Road Project (CRP).
4. A detailed combined on -site sewage system and surface water
disposal plan for the entire project shall be approved by the
Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health
District prior to the issuance of any building permit.
5. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be
in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Any
portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by
vehicles shall be maintained in hard surface paving.
.3r
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -37 -80
c) WATER PURVEYOR 6 Q � ,_,� 1
1. The water is provided f onsite =well. ' The Fire Marshal
has indicated future development will require review for adequate
fire protection.
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1. Findings:
a) This project lies over the Spokane Aquifer.
b) It is within Critical Water Supply Service Area No. 3, and
within or adjacent to the service area of Model Irrigation
District. Groundwater resources appear adequate to
support development at this density.
c) The project is inside the 201 Sewer Study Area (Zone 3)
and inside the Primary Sanitary Sewer Area recommended in
the '208' Study. The methods of sewage disposal is subject
to approval of the Director of Utilities pursuant to County
Resolution 80 -0418 adopted March 24 1980. The
topography and soils in the area are generally suitable for
use of individual on -site sewage systems; however, the lot
lies in a flood hazard area. The lot is not of the proper
dimensions to permit use of both an individual well and
sewage system.
2. Recommendations:
a) Subject to specific application approval and issuance of
permits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on -site
sewage disposal systems may be authorized.
b) A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan
shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health
Officer prior to the issuance of any building permit for this
lot.
c) Paving of the entire area, as shown on plans accompanying
the zone change application, may not be approved in the
final development plans.
e) SEPA
1. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to
43.21C.080 RCW be accomplished by the applicant within thirty
(30) days of formal action by the Zoning Hearing Examiner
Committee as instructed by the Planning Department staff.
2. The request has proven to be environmentally non - significant.
Therefore, a final declaration of non - significance shall be signed
by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee.
f) ZONING
1. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for
maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning
Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the
project prior to release of building permits. '
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE -37 -80
2. The applicant shall develop' subject property generally in
accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner
Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning
Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the
following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and
general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must
conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be
maintained.
g) UTILITIES
1. • An on -site sewage system be allowed under the rules and
regulations of the Spokane County Health District and subject to
specific application approval and issuance of permits by the
Health Officer.
2. The owner, his heirs and successors shall agree not to protest
legal assessments for any utility local improvement district to
provide central sewerage service to this property.
3. Located - within- the- Gr- itical- W ate r — Supply -Ser- vice- Area_bu,t_not_
.with in—any- pur- veyor-' s distr- ic-t.— May —be— serviced —b.y an..
ind. vidual _ we61- owned - and - operated - by -lot owner-.
NO
s t"31 S7..s•7..��J AVE, " `. .I .3�, � ,avc: '� —�,ly• '°� lls� o.W�
32ND AVE
r �T�
f o
9
-'+ • O
or
f
f' h
m
ZP sM \ :.:�
(r� Po:vOHA oA. a� � eai° � �•.� I
f-k) rJ r
J �!
J
BR • ho 4-5 .,\
I sc co ' �!
au r cfl'I
I CwE .
! 6th
- - - - - -- - -'r
2
n �i y a H R PE
Q
r
-lM4N X52\ /• 7
Per
1000,
w.
� L
/ o
ZONING WORKSHEET Form C
Application # ;a,6f -31-90 _
33 - as - 4¢
This document will provide the Planning Department Staff with written verification that:
1) The site's legal description has been reviewed by the Engineering and Planning
Departments who agree that the legal description is acceptable.
2) That the proposed development can meet the requirements of the County Health
District, the County Engineers, the County Utilities Department, County Fire
Marshal and Water Purveyor.
- 3) That adequate provisions for the proposed development can be provided for:
-residential-,, commercial, industrial and mining uses.
An applicant is required to present a copy of the proposed DEVELOPMENT PLAN with
this,worksheet to each of the listed agencies for their review and determination as
to"`,whether the proposal can meet minimum State, County and Health District require -
`'ments '..oNote:•. shall contact indicated agencies in seauence listed below )
preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane County Engineer's
A ,:. r:
=:..
�OffiCeand;.the�proposefl development has been reviewed.
i•,1) "'SEate.DOT required; Yes �_ No.
ccess•to be limited to:
$) ccess permit is required.
4'��':` i_r •• 9 y is 7'�.; " -` • •
" t`'�v��, t " ... '
o' �� , Dedication for right -of -way is required.
��' feet on T�i's.�,.�`. /1'ege Road, Street, Avenue.)
• b,'�'�F _ . Radius ( foot) is required.
' ;. • (On and
"!•'. t;c.:' - " Slope easement is required
5)' ' 'Drainage Plan is required, t/ on -site
a•6) •: 'Pavi Permit is L— feet on
C l urb is required, (along Road, Street, Avenue.
Sidewalk is required, (along Road, Street, Avenue.)
11 J:1 1 1 1
Applicant must be willing to participate in future LID/RID. }
10) 41 1 I:e description is acceptable as reviewed.
K IZI `
- ✓ eY
''�~- •"'iii ^
r- r,
; «','4Signed' Date
., ,..e . ,'
Road, Street, Avenue,)
off -site
Road.)
OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Dote Maw 15 19 g0_
Inter - office Communication
To Mn1ng Adminintratnr
From OniintyR(nginnar
0 4 10' Dishman Mica and 20' radius on Dishman Mica & Hatherlq Circle
0 9
016
018
019
Form 327-CR.
File No. ZE -37 -80
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter
having come before
the Examiner Committee on
June 12, 1980, and
the members
of the Committee
present
being John Culler
Chairman, Kenneth
Kennedy and
Paul Sceva, Jr. and
having
personally visited the
site.
B. PROPOSAL
The sponsor, Donald A. and Pearl P. Miles are requesting approval of a zone
reclassification, File No. ZE-37 -80 Residential Mobile Home to Commercial, for the
purpose of developing a trucking dispatch office.
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, commercial, and
undeveloped.
2.
That
the
Comprehensive Plan designates
this area as appropriate for
conditions have substantially
,residential
development.
area and accordingly, the pro-
3.
That
the
existing zoning of the property
described in the application is
existing uses in the area.
Residential
That the owners of adjacent lands expressed
Mobile Home.
4.
That
the
provisions of RCW 43.21C (The
State Environmental Policy Act)
have
been
complied with.
the public health, safety, and welfare.
5.
That
the
proper legal requirements for advertisement
of the Agenda Item
Examiner Committee:
have
been
fulfilled.
6. That the land in this area is unsuitable for the proposed use, or uses
a) That the use is not suitable for the area due to its close proximity to
adjacent residential properties..
1
within the proposed Zone Classification.
7.
That the applicant has not demonstrated that
conditions have substantially
changed since the original zoning of this
area and accordingly, the pro-
posed rezone is not justified.
8.
That the proposed use is incompatible with
existing uses in the area.
9.
That the owners of adjacent lands expressed
disapproval of the proposed
use.
10.
The Hearing Examiner Committee does not
find the proposed use to be in
harmony with the general purpose and will
not be otherwise detrimental to
the public health, safety, and welfare.
11.
The following are additional findings of
fact considered by the Hearing
Examiner Committee:
a) That the use is not suitable for the area due to its close proximity to
adjacent residential properties..
1
File No. ZE -37 -80
E. ORDER
The Hearing
Examiner Committee,
pursuant to the
aforementioned, finds that the
application
of Donald A. and Pearl P. Miles
for a zone reclassification as
described in
the application should
be denied.
Motion
by: Kennedy
Seconded
by: Sceva, Jr.
Vote:
0 -3- Denied
HEARING
EXAMINER COMMITTEE
Chairman
ATTEST:
WALLIS D. HUBBARD
Planning Director
2
Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of June 12, 1980. (contd.)
5) ZE- 64 -80, Agricultural Suburban to Local Business: Gunby
Location: Generally located 170 feet east of Pines Road on Maxwell Avenue
and 70 feet north of Maxwell Avenue on the east side of Pines Road.
Section 15- 25 -44.
Proposal: Ceramic Shop.
Action: Approval. (Vote: 3 - 0)
6) ZE- 69 -80, Agricultural to Restricted Industrial: Hewson
Location: Generally located 350 feet south of Appleway Avenue on the west
side of Greenacres Road. Section 18- 25 -45.
Proposal: Possible expansion of adjoining business.
�If`l,l Action: Approval. (Vote: 2 - 1)
7) ZE- 37 -80, Residential Mobile Home to Commercial: Miles
Location: Generally located at the Southwest corner of the Dishman -Mica Road
and Hatherly Circle. Section 33- 25 -44.
Proposal: Trucking Dispatch Office.
Action: Denial. (Vote: 0 - 3) The Hearing Examiner Committee felt that
the use is not suitable for the area due to its close proximity to
14'6 adjacent residential properties.
8) ZE- 65 -80, Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban: Groesbeck
Location: Generally located at the northeast corner of Fifth Avenue and
Havana Street. Section 23- 25 -43.
Proposal: 43 -Unit Apartment Complex for the Elderly.
Action: Approval. (Vote: 3 - 0)
ZS- 60 -80, Agricultural to Local Business: Coeur d'Alene Development Company
Location: Generally located north of 55th Avenue and west of the Palouse
Highway. Section 3- 24 -43.
Proposal: Offices and limited business uses.
Action: Continued to the July 10, 1980, meeting of the Zoning Hearing
Examiner Committee at 9:00 A.M., to allow additional time for the
City of Spokane to develop further studies regarding the proposal,
in cooperation with the Spokane Plan Commission, Spokane Regional
Planning Conference and Spokane County Planning Department, to
consider future development of the Palouse Highway area.
(Vote: 3 - 0)
DUE TO LACK OF TIME, THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE HEARD ON JUNE 13, 1980
10) ZW- 58 -80, Agricultural to Manufacturing: Wilson Tool and Manufacturing
Location: Generally located at the southeast corner of Hayford and Thorpe
Roads. Section 6- 24 -42.
f;p'u Proposal: Manufacturing uses.
Action: It was the consensus of the members, that the application of Wilson
Tool and Manufacturing be continued to the July 10, 1980, meeting
of the Spokane County Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee at 9:00 A.M.
or as soon as possible thereafter to allow time to readvertise the
proposal correctly,and notice to property owners in the area will
be supplied by the staff of the 4Dkane County Planning Department.
2
'40 OFFICIAL PLAT
A.R.5COTT- EHGjNUE:R-Z5POY-,ANF- COUN
M Prin cl ,
P
o
F- z
31 ST
z b 3. 6 LU
LU .. . .-*
z Of I -J,
z a-
119
x E
Ll- 01 a- 7
6.")
-04J
32 ND L — - _
- - -- -i r- - - - - -- _ -
BLJ 2 7
4 5 11 12 - 34
L L 0
4 8 7 1 6 1 111 . 1111 2 ",*, 9 3
i� 1 4 —4 1 9 d I I
OD
A N
3 4 s 6
2 4 5 6 17 2 7 8 9
21 7 8 f3
7 341 h
2
4
L9
ty
OX C 34
8 BL <
.3 j
I 1 5 , 1. q — Ln
\� �Z &-K 6 9 14 C,4 30 4
j 13 Z IOBL�44-(n 0
M 3 Ca � 1
Iz ff- I — 6 1
u
(D U. 14$ 1- 1 1 1
15 (D I ; : . j. I T I rj
6 k; - - — — I , ,
S 7 . 357—i
1-11 1 A cc) 130' :
6- SO
35 th 7 zO
2 Av 13 7 \ Z 1 17 111 2']6 ;2 -6 , 5 1 1 Q) •
56 1L
6 _r
C1
5 3 4� 5 ;1 101 Fi 3 4 t:",, 1- 5 2 Q)
8
9 Z2 B4
PT 50
B K 1, ' . ** , \ 0 0
,A 1�11%
f
L8,.
4
0� < mo. 24 Z' D,
'9
0
Z
0
U ?
0
BLK 1 3
2
i
AVE
U
1�j
1
S7 8 1 1 14
, �t'
N z ,;. 6 o
3 R D VE. M T. N A 4zis A
-9 3 2 IN
: --I
a
a
7
5
4
I i
3 : 'I *..,.-
1 , 4.j
a tz
I
7
7
%
897
1 7
—
Cr --------
Z- tj
A/A 2 316-
•
0 L4
86
'3 T is Z3 zq
04-
0
'gor
3 4
I N
T
- Ie - v)
I L� = 3
I G I z 5,
0
4\
OD
A N
3 4 s 6
2 4 5 6 17 2 7 8 9
21 7 8 f3
7 341 h
2
4
L9
ty
OX C 34
8 BL <
.3 j
I 1 5 , 1. q — Ln
\� �Z &-K 6 9 14 C,4 30 4
j 13 Z IOBL�44-(n 0
M 3 Ca � 1
Iz ff- I — 6 1
u
(D U. 14$ 1- 1 1 1
15 (D I ; : . j. I T I rj
6 k; - - — — I , ,
S 7 . 357—i
1-11 1 A cc) 130' :
6- SO
35 th 7 zO
2 Av 13 7 \ Z 1 17 111 2']6 ;2 -6 , 5 1 1 Q) •
56 1L
6 _r
C1
5 3 4� 5 ;1 101 Fi 3 4 t:",, 1- 5 2 Q)
8
9 Z2 B4
PT 50
B K 1, ' . ** , \ 0 0
,A 1�11%
f
L8,.
4
0� < mo. 24 Z' D,
'9
0
Z
0
U ?
0
C,
5
' 4
T
3
2
"5
PIPE
2
1-
4
•
0 L4
86
to
04-
0
'gor
3 4
I N
I L� = 3
0
4\
37 TN T 0 7
L2
) B 7
L6 37TH !A
BI 30, 3
58,
'\ � Q :.i.. .3 7N1 3 4 5 6 .�2 �.J 11 L -- �
%
N 17
16 K Sewage
T 4
Lt. 19 Treatment
T H k.2 ' Facility
CO - 38 0
2
CO
-V - 50 6 /3 Z 5 A 0
7
SG z %
4
ep 1 -3 O-z W 26
11 71 7 970
A,
0
v
0 \ W 0 0 9:
, 1/ [9
13 `\ �� /' - t�, 0
I ;
— 5 6 '�I r � }'
2 s T° La'z: -- � Id I �i I �
:z
>
L L 1 i 0
Ld 8 ZLJ
7'
exz z
.: tM:.7 /.ftpN � /�:; . C 3 �1 S 9 Vi i 5 6 p i� �• I � 1
Y
zo' 4 9
r N 3
3j 1,1
21 BR. 45
.p t 1 F I l � \ jr J �. 5
12
old 4 0
to
J
Cil-7
rL
1v
2NLb 3 T 5 3 ° n; B R. 145 19
(Old 144/1-4
SL K o oc r' J. I N . �.
to 7"
�p 0 .
1: IL 76 1 G
3
N
CHESTE 31
z C M E.TE:R
�0
A z
2
1
t, 2 z 4
3 7 0 01
0
4,* 4
-44 th 33 3 4
Ctc. 29 7
Z— - 5
k k)
PIPE
Q FN
arm
S E A 7-/Zx4 NO. 47
DA D ES CR / P TI ON
6 - 1 5 - 5 5 E C 7 / C) 1v '� 5 4 - R 0 D U C C- D FROM L- / fV E IV 7 A-1 Y L A R
13 J 4. -3
4!
- 77
N O T E