Loading...
PE-1414B-81Date Submitted Description Initials ©S / 0• / 45 AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES OR PRIORITY FEE COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING _ki FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING de- / / NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED /6 DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTE / / ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS / / BOND RELEASED -ROAD & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ' / / HEARING EXAM APPROVED PROJECT APPROVED DENIED DENIED- APPEALED BBC / / / BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED / / STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICAN (SYL /SUZANNE) / / STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (SANDY) 3 Ai 4'5 i tSe5w to Jb•+4 " p" p^ izz tkv$ao (0c4 4 1 1 1$t '`,,) Pc_ i - 9. 0 5-,.L. —. rn( )C) .5.1c Rey, /'0J d.�.c o �.ifsis � " ' " " Ar c `-L A CC,Vts-twts (An �w �:e C - /6 `15 .try c rr1 7)--d 7-c" _ tl �T% 1446wt1Tht_C rrl , - ;:i cc&11 5 if QE *rsD - Tat . coRtfRO 70 5Er sw Mtat etata rjc 42; - dm-v- (0" lit G (« auet ( lorNQen M cZ 10 / vim a twit 6, Ito 21 WO ),t f sk2 cz 00 # bevit, 4 11 ° '50 cab ertittokia , At 2 IA '4, (NC QS wujf J . - 6.0.6 lisle 5 L.I t o a Q nnati /sR CA(L.,l /.;f itay Ge„de1.j t.m r 4 %11 4 1.0 0 t•i3 • la.i,I Fla.) Rzt,li ma Date to Review Date to AA & DR Date Received Project Name Section - Township - Range SITE ADDRESS E BARKER \N MISSION PARCEL # 08553 -9009+ Applicant's Name EDWARD DEAN - STANTON SPOKANE LP Address 16720 NE 116TH - REDMOND WA 98052 Work # Contact person FLOOD ZONE V YES Planning Contact Person ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FILE# PE- 1414R_9, Time Time 0 (k RIVERWA -Y —VTA 3RD ADD PUD ibmai 45 DL. tlig4 to i-P la -t if -9 s rn cc' - W • : S SCHOOL 356 Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name Related File # No. Lots W' No.Acres 1— Date Conditions mailed Phone # 206)869 -6618 Phone # MICHAEL HUNT NORTH IDAHO ENGINEERING 4200 SELTICE WAY STE 2 COEUR d'ALENE ID 83814 Phone # 456 -2205 \1 BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING IN THE MATTER OF GRANTING AN EXTENSION - OF -TIME REQUESTED FOR PE- 1414 -81 / PUDE -1 -82 / ZE- 92 -81, "RIVERWALK" (PREVIOUSLY "RIVERWAY VILLA ") AN APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT, PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND ZONE CHANGE AND GRANTING APPROVAL OF REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PRELIMINARY PUD SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR "RIVERWALK ". THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Michael A. Hunt pursuant to a letter dated August 16, 1994, has been received and decided upon (after an extensive review, redesign and coordination with the applicant's engineers and the various agencies), pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter III, Section G), Spokane County Zoning Code and RCW 58.17.140. AND THIS MATTER, a request for approval of a "Revised Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site Development Plan (PUD) of RIVERWALK" (previously Riverway Villa) as submitted by Inland Pacific Engineering on May 19, 1995. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by Spokane County Planning. 2. The proposal for the time extension is located south of both the Spokane River and the Washington State Parks Department's Centennial Trail property, east of and adjacent to Barker Road, and north of and adjacent to Mission Avenue in Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 45 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. 3. The Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) plans were approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on April 2, 1982. The development then consisted of a manufactured home subdivision on 118 acres for 365 lots including open space and one commercial lot. The preliminary plat approval also included a rezone from Agricultural (A) to Residential Manufactured Home (RMH) with a (PUD) Overlay zone and to Commercial (C) under the now expired, Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. Such zone reclassifications are accomplished as each phase of the preliminary plat is finalized and recorded with the County Auditor. No portion of the project has been recorded to date. 4. The Preliminary Plat, PUD and Zone Change original approvals were, in part, based on an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared for the proposed project. However, numerous changes have occurred since 1982, which require mitigating measures as new conditions of approval. 5. The Findings of the August 5, 1993, Time Extension decision are included by reference with this action to assure clarification of the below findings, decision and conditions. 6. At the time of the preliminary approvals, April 2, 1982, the Comprehensive Plan designated this area as URBAN Category. The location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone. The Comprehensive Plan was adopted late 1980 with an effective date of January 1, 1981. The URBAN designation has remained the same since the 1982 preliminary approvals. The approved original plans and zone changes continue to conform to the adopted Comprehensive Plan, including the May 19, 1995, Revised Preliminary Plans. 7. On February 24, 1983, the sponsor submitted a Final PUD Site Development Plan for the southern portion (S1 /2) of the project and requested a change of condition to postpone the Final PUD hearing of the northern portion (N1 /2) for three (3) years. The request was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee (HEC) on April 14, 1983. The approved Final PUD Site Development Plan for the SI/2 of the site consisted of a maximum of 178 lots on approximately 50 acres, which excluded the proposed commercial property at the southwest corner. The approved Final S1 /2 PUD Site Development Plan was different from the Preliminary PUD Development Plan stamped "Received November 12, 1981." Larger residential lots, consolidated open space, elimination of recreational improvements and redesign of the roads were approved in 1983. The HEC approved a redesign of the PUD that clearly deviated from the original conceptual "preliminary PUD" map stamped "Received November 12, 1981." The remaining NI /2 of the Preliminary PUD was conditioned to acquire Final PUD Site Development Plan approval no later than May 1, 1986. After the Planning Department sent a late Expiration Notice to the sponsor, a Time PM FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 2 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 7. continued Extension Application was accepted July 1986, processed, public notice given and the project was granted approval approximately October 1986. Therefore, this deadline was administratively (see Finding No. 8., 10. and 11. below) extended which followed with four additional administrative time extensions (see Finding No. 12. below). As a condition of the last Time Extension approved on August 5, 1993, a one (1) year deadline was imposed on this north Final PUD Site Development Plan approval with an expiration date of September 1, 1994. On March 24, 1994, before the above expiration date for the north Final PUD, the sponsor submitted an overall (N1 /2 and S1 /2) Final PUD Site Development Plan for administrative review and approval along with this time extension application. Since that submittal the sponsor has proposed and received administrative approval to submit a revised overall "preliminary PUD," which improves the lot design, open space and road design. May 19, 1995, (over one year later) the revised "preliminary PUD" was submitted and will be made part of this time extension decision to create a clear record of the "revised preliminary plat" and the "revised preliminary PUD." 8. On October 22, 1985, with Resolution Number 85 -0900 the Board of County Commissioners adopted the new Spokane County Zoning Code to be effective January 1, 1986. The new Chapter 14.704, Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay Zone, established an administrative process to approve Final PUD site plans. The previous Zoning Ordinance had required public hearings before the Hearing Examiner Committee to approve Final PUD site plans. 9. The project area was zoned Agricultural (A) at the time of the April 2, 1982, preliminary approvals. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is presently zoned Urban Residential -3.5 (UR. -3.5), previously established as Agricultural (A) zoning in 1957 (ZE- 286 -57) and redesignated to UR -3.5 on January 1, 1991, consistent with the PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT THE SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING CODE. Note, as each phase of the preliminary plat is finalized and recorded with the County Auditor the existing UR- 3.5 zoning will be reclassified to comply with the original zone change approval on April 2, 1982, pursuant the PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT. The project area with the old approved Residential Mobil Home (RMH) Zone will be substituted with the present Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) and the present PUD overlay zone. The old approved Commercial (C) Zone will be substituted with the present Community Business (B -2). Any development of the proposed plat and planned unit development will need to conform with the current Zoning, Planned Unit Development, and Subdivision standards. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the revised proposal as conditioned will conform to the requirements of the approved zone change to UR -7 Zone with PUD Overlay Zone and the B -2 Zone. 10. March 18, 1986, Spokane County adopted specific criteria for administratively considering the Extension of Time regarding the expiration of preliminary subdivisions. Extension of time decisions no longer require a public hearing before the HEC. The time extension criteria is found in Chapter III, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance (Board of County Commissioner Resolution Number 86- 0246). 11. October 1986, the Planning Department granted its first administrative (without public hearing) time extension for 2 years under the authority of Chapter III, Section G of the amended Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. This 1986 Extension of Time approval amended and extended the previous conditions of approval regarding all specific deadlines of the April 14, 1986, Hearing Examiner Committee decision. This deadline extension included the N1 /2 Final PUD deadline of May 1, 1986 (see Finding No. 7. above). 12. This Time Extension application is the seventh (7th) request for a time extension. The total life of the Preliminary Plat, PUD and Zone Change has been 13 years and 2 months: • April 1982 to April 1983 Preliminary approvals - HEC • April 1983 to April 1986 3 years granted with change of conditions - HEC • Nov 1986 to Dec 1988 2 years (see Finding No. 11. above) - Ping. Dept. • Dec 1988 to Jan 1990 2 years - Ping. Dept. • Jan 1990 to Jan 1992 2 years - Ping. Dept. • Jan 1992 to Jan 1993 1 year - Ping. Dept. March 4, 1993 Time Extension Denied for lack of progress March 12, 1993 Appeal of Denial and additional information provided May 24, 1993 Time Extension administratively Approved with updated conditions June 3, 1993 Appeal of new and updated conditions -of- approval Aug 19, 1993 Hearing Examiner Committee public hearing scheduled and advertised July 1993 additional information provided July 27, 1993 appeal withdrawn by Jim Reuter July 29, 1993 withdrawal confirmed by project legal council, F. J. Dullanty, Jr. Aug 5, 1993 administratively amended the May 24, 1993 Time Extension conditions • August 1993 to September 1994 1 year - Ping. Dept. August 23, 1993 HEC withdrawal of appeal ORDER (see Finding No. 13. below) - June 14, 1995, Extension of Time and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 3 12. continued The above stated chronology does not include the processing time for which approval had lapsed during review or appeal of decisions for each time extension request. Complete and timely requests for any future time extensions shall be consistent with RCW 58.17.140 and Spokane County Planning Subdivision Ordinance. Timely requests for consideration of time extensions are the applicant/developer's responsibility as notices of expiration of approval by Spokane County Planning are not regularly provided. When said notices are provided they are done so only on a courtesy basis. 13. The appeal of the conditions of approval added to the administrative May 24, 1993, Time Extension approval was advertised and scheduled for the August 19, 1993 Hearing Examiner Committee (HEC) public hearing. Due to subsequent amendments made to these conditions in the administrative August 5, 1993, Time Extension approval, the appellant, Jim Reuter, withdrew his appeal by letter dated July 27, 1993, as did the project attorneys by letter dated July 29, 1993. This appeal agenda item was not presented at the August 19, 1993, HEC hearing. Later, on August 23, 1993, the Hearing Examiner Committee signed FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER which states: ORDER -- "The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the above Findings of Fact and Conclusion, accepts the withdrawal by Jim Reuter, of the application of the Preliminary Plat of PE- 1414 -81 described in the application known a Riverway Villa." MOTION -- "UNANIMOUS TO APPROVE THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RIVERWAY VILLA AND RENDER THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND APPEAL OF THE EXTENSION OF TIME NULL AND VOID." This order and motion was based on Finding No. 2, which incorrectly states: "2. On July 29, 1993, Spokane County Planning received a written request from the appellant, Jim Reuter, to withdraw the preliminary plat of Riverway Villa. The Hearing Examiner Committee, by accepting the withdrawal, renders the preliminary plat and appeal of the extension of time null and void." The evidence within file PE- 1414 -81, including the withdrawal letters, indicates the Preliminary Plat and PUD sponsors clearly intended to keep the project alive and, in fact, only requested to WITHDRAW THE APPEAL from the August 19, 1993, HEC hearing agenda, since the issues with the conditions of approval had been administratively resolved with the County Prosecutor's Office and Spokane County Planning administration. While the August 23, 1993, Hearing Examiner Committee FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER could have been written more clearly, all references to withdrawal applies only to the appeal and not the overall preliminary approvals. 14. This development and its approvals have exceeded its four (4) year grace period (the first 3 year expiration period and 1 additional year) where additional conditions cannot be applied to the original approval, as provided in RCW 58.17.140, EXTENSIONS. All time extensions thereafter may have additional conditions of approval added or updated as each subsequent time extension is granted. The upgrading of conditions allows Spokane County to bring development approvals into compliance with present adopted policy and regulations while addressing current conditions and resolving current problems or impacts. 15. The application for this time extension has been evaluated using the below adopted criteria. These criteria are found in Chapter III, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this time extension decision. Section G states; Approval of a preliminary subdivision shall automatically expire three years after preliminary approval is granted unless a time extension is applied for." and follows with "Upon application for time extension , the Planning Director or designee may administratively approve extensions for up to three (3) year periods provided at least one of the following circumstances is found to apply: 1. That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the last extension was granted and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval RESPONSE: No portion of the site has been finalized or recorded as a final plat. However, Phase 1 (40 lots in the southwest corner with a public sewer system and excluding the commercial site) is presently being reviewed for Final Plat approval to be recorded with the County Auditor. 2. That the preliminary plat as approved remains consistent with the Generalized Comprehensive Plan for Spokane County insofar as density and other development provisions apply, and the sponsor has taken substantial steps towards finalizing his plat, which shall include but not be limited to: June 14, 1995, Extension of Time and a Revised Preliminary Plat /PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 15. continued 2. continued a. surveying the lots within the development, b. arranging for public services to the site, c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary plat, d. the completion of studies or other requirements which were part of preliminary plat approval. RESPONSE: Correspondence from North Idaho Engineering dated August 16, 1994, indicates that progress has been made towards finalizing the project. The progress is summarized as: Survey calculations of the entire first 37 (now 40) lot Final Plat Map have been performed. Public utilities to the site have been arranged. Construction financing has been secured and is in place pending release of construction permits by the Spokane County Engineering Department. Sanitary Sewer Improvement Plans including lift station design have been submitted to the Spokane County Utilities Department. The Final PUD Plan for the southerly 1/2 of Riverway Villa has been approved and the northerly 1/2 has been submitted for administrative review and approval as provided for in Chapter 14.704, Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay Zone of the Spokane County Zoning Code. The mitigation agreement with the Central Valley School District has been executed. Landscaping plans for Indiana Avenue have been submitted. i. The draft declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions, articles of incorporation and bylaws have been submitted. Soils testing has been completed the results of which have been incorporated into the redesign of street and storm drain plans. Since the above August 16, 1994, letter, North Idaho Engineering and Inland Pacific Engineering indicates that additional progress has been made: 1. The water plan for the first phase has been approved. The water system with fire hydrants have been installed for the first phase. Consolidated Irrigation Water District has accepted the water system and the contractor is has completed the pressure tests and was in the process of flushing the system to pass health tests. 2. A dryline sewer system has been installed for the first phase. 3. Engineering design and plans have been prepared and submitted to WSDOT for boring under the freeway. WSDOT has approved a boring permit. 4. Engineering design and plans have been prepared and submitted to WSDOT for Barker & Freeway interchange right turn lane improvements. WSDOT has approved the I -90 eastbound right turn lane permit. 5. Electric, cable and gas utilities have been installed for the first phase. 6. Street grading for the first phase is completed and "red top" surveyed and staked ready for asphalt. 7. Curb forms have been partially installed along Indiana for the first phase. It was "red top" surveyed and staked ready for asphalt. 8. A model home building permit was issued and was being constructed. 9. Redesign of the "preliminary plat" and "preliminary PUD" plans are complete. 3. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This provision shall not apply to public utility extension which the project sponsor would normally fund. RESPONSE: This condition does not apply to the first 38 lots however the developer has as indicated in the August 16, 1994, North Idaho Engineering letter that preparation of plans and documents to facilitate future phases have been expedited, including public sewer for the entire project. 16. Spokane County Planning does find that the applicant has taken significant steps to finalize all phases of the preliminary plat of record prior to the September 1, 1994, expiration of the preceding time extension (6th extension). During this present time extension review period additional progress has also been made as indicated in FINDING 15. above. The present owners have purchased the entire preliminary plat. The sewer system has been designed, sized and partially installed to serve the entire preliminary plat, considerable engineering has been accomplished and is currently underway for a major portion of the preliminary plat and a redesign of the preliminary plat/PUD has been completed. Therefore the applicant/owner has demonstrated sufficient progress to comply with the requirements of Chapter III, Section G, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance for extending the expiration date of the preliminary approvals for three years. a. b. c. d. f. g. h. J. File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 4 June 14, 1995, Extension of Time and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 5 17. Additional conditions for this time extension have been recommended by the various reviewing agencies and departments, including Spokane County Planning, the County Division of Engineering and Roads, the County Division of Utilities, the County Health District the County Division of Buildings, the Washington State Department of Transportation, Central Valley School District, the County Parks Department and Fire District No.1. Said conditions shall be included in the appropriate sections of this decision and shall not preclude previous conditions of approval for time extensions unless specifically stated. If conditions conflict, the most current condition shall apply. 18. The Spokane County Parks Department has commented on the proposed Preliminary Plat and PUD time extension pursuant a letter dated February 15, 1995. The Parks Department has requested a voluntary agreement be completed between the Parks Department and the property owner to mitigate impacts to the County Park system. A previous February 1, 1995, letter from Parks Director, Sam Angove, also indicates their desire to purchase 7.4 acres of the PUD open space adjacent the Centennial Trail at the north end of the project. County legal counsel has indicated such agreements may be required. Spokane County Planning recommends the property owner negotiate with the Spokane County Parks Department to provide for appropriate capital facilities as required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 58.17.110. Approval of this time extension should include conditions requiring that provisions for appropriate facilities be in place prior to recording this Final Plat in the form of dedication of park land or a written agreement between the owner and the Spokane County Parks Department. Note, property from this project along the Spokane River was dedicated to Washington State Parks for the Centennial Trail. 19. The Central Valley School District No. 356 has commented on the proposed Preliminary Plat and PUD time extension pursuant a letter dated February 21, 1995. The District has indicated that existing school facilities are inadequate to serve the proposed Plat and PUD and wishes to negotiate with the owner to provide adequate capital facilities as required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 58.17.110. Review by County legal counsel indicates the condition requested by the School District can be required for developments. Approval of this time extension should include conditions requiring that provisions for appropriate facilities be in place prior to recording the Final Plat in the form of a written agreement between the owner and the school district. Note, the school district indicates there is an existing signed agreement. However, the request to add the standard condition will assure that the existing and signed agreement will continue to be required and maintained throughout the finalization of this project. 20. The following facts and conclusions are also relevant. a. The applicant/owner should continue to show substantial progress toward complying with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time for the remaining phases of the approved Preliminary Plat / PUD which have not been filed. b. By reference FINDINGS of all previous approvals are specifically incorporated herein unless otherwise stated. An attempt to include all previous and applicable Spokane County Planning CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL within this time extension has been made by Spokane County Planning. Due to the complex nature of this file omissions may have occurred. If further clarification is necessary regarding previous conditions, the file record and documents continue to be the authority and shall be used to resolve such questions /determinations. c. A part of the northern portion of the approved preliminary plat of record fell under the jurisdiction of the Washington State Shoreline Management Act, RCW 90.58, and the Spokane County Shoreline Program, WAC 173 -19 -400. Creation of the Washington State Centennial Trail along the Spokane River has removed portions of the original site from Shoreline jurisdiction. Review of the Revised PUD site plan for the northern portion of the preliminary plat shows the portions of the site that is still within the Shorelines area, designated "Conservancy." About 15 of the proposed lots are partly within this 200 foot shoreline boundary; however, each of these lots has a building site that is outside the 200 foot boundary. d. The site is located within an area of Spokane County which was removed from the sewer exemption area on July 1, 1994 by the Washington State Health Board pursuant to WAC 246 - 272 -100. The site is also located within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA). Any future time extension requests may be affected by the new exemption boundary; however, the project is to be served by public sewer. 21. The site is located within the Public Transit Benefit Area (PTBA). Route # 18, Broadway Feeder, provides connecting service to the Valley Park and Ride lot located on University Avenue and 4th Avenue. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 6 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 22. The Spokane County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a PRINCIPLE ARTERIAL and Mission Avenue as a MINOR ARTERIAL. The existing roadway widths are inconsistent with that specified in the adopted Arterial Road Plan. In order to implement the Plan the County Engineer has requested a 5 foot reserve strip along Barker Road and a 10 foot reserve strip along Mission Avenue to be designated as a Future Acquisition Area. Preliminary plat approval also required dedication of an additional 15 feet of right -of -way on Barker Avenue and dedication of 10 feet on Mission Road. Sidewalks are required along these arterial roads fronting and within the plat. The Washington State Department of Transportation has recommended conditions to mitigate impacts to the Barker Road and Interstate -90 interchange. Those recommendations have been incorporated into this decision. The Spokane County Engineering Department has met with the developers representative and reached an agreement/understanding with regards to phasing and development related improvements to Barker Road and Mission Avenue. That understanding and conditions thereof have been incorporated into the Engineer's conditions as set forth in this document. 23. The proposed plat will be served by a public water system. Waste water disposal will be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, which involves an approved public sewer system with pressurized lines to the sewer trunkline south of Interstate 90. 24. Recognizing the conditions of approval and Spokane County development standards, appropriate provisions have been made to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare and that the public use and interest will be served by plating the proposed subdivision as conditioned. The subdivision proposal is generally consistent with RCW 58.17 and the County subdivision regulations, promoting the public health, safety and general welfare in accordance with standards established by the state and Spokane County. Spokane County Planning has considered the provision of public facilities cited in RCW 58.17.110 (2). More specifically: a. open spaces b. drainage ways c. public and/or private rights -of -way d. transit e. potable water f. sanitary waste disposal g. parks and recreation facilities h. playgrounds i. schools and school grounds j. sidewalks 25. The delay in issuing this time extension is the result of (1) change of project sponsors, (2) change of project engineers, (3) resignation of County planner assigned to this project (4) an extensive review of the large thirteen year old file, (5) the physical reorganization of the file (6) two reorganizations of planners within Spokane County Planning and (7) sponsor proposed redesign of the preliminary plat/PUD. The review revealed considerable confusion regarding the file organization and content of the file and a need to clarify the record, as indicated in the above findings. 26. The applicant has requested to call the development by the name " RIVERWALK" and will record all subdivisions by variations of this new name. This was administratively approved. 27. May 19, 1995, the applicant submitted a "Revise Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site development Plan (PUD) of RIVERWALK" for the entire project. This submittal have been proposed by the applicant to improve the design of the site plan (ie, eliminate double fronting lots, consolidate open areas, other) and has been circulated for agency review and comments. The proposed Final Plat Phase 1 area of the 1983 (S1 /2) Final PUD site plan has not changed. NOTE: To clarify the original application (see 1982 Zone Change Map 1:400 Assessor Map stamped by L.S. Patrick Moore) and the present applicant's intent, Inland Pacific Engineering submitted a May 25, 1995, letter with documents requesting to: (1) eliminate the commercial lot from the "preliminary PUD" and (2) remove that portion of the original 1981 property from the "Preliminary Plat of Record" and the "Preliminary PUD" that was transferred to Washington State Parks Department for the Centennial Trail, Auditor No.9112090116 dated Dec. 9, 1991. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 7 28. The May 19, 1995, "Revise Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site development Plan (PUD) of RIVERWALK" was found to be in substantial conformance to the original approvals described in 3. and 7. above and this revised plan has been administratively approved. Because all but the Phase 1 of the Preliminary Plat, the Final S1 /2 PUD and the N1 /2 Preliminary PUD has been revised, a "Final PUD Site Development Plan" will need to be submitted and must be approved for compliance with the "Revised Preliminary PUD" for the area of the proposed Final Plat prior to each Final Plat being recorded. This will allow for flexibility in determining the specific and detailed design of each Final PUD of each final plat at that time, for that market and pursuant the then existing development standards. Each Final PUD site development plan will need to substantially conform with the "preliminary PUD" and specifically conform with the PUD Overlay Zone standards in affect at the time. 29. The May 19, 1995, "Revise Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site development Plan (PUD) of RIVERWALK" shows the applicants present development phases; however, these phase boundaries may need to be modified as the economy, market and other variables change. DECISION BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, a three year extension of time request for PE- 1414 -81 / PUDE -1 -82 / ZE- 92 -81, "RIVERWALK" (previously "Riverway Villa) an approved Preliminary Plat, Preliminary Planned Unit Development and zone reclassification is hereby APPROVED until July 1, 1998. The May 19, 1995, "Revise Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site development Plan (PUD) of RIVERWALK" is also hereby APPROVED as the official preliminary plat of record and as the preliminary planned unit development plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL All pervious conditions of approval shall continue to apply, as applicable, except as specifically amended. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING 1. MI conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee and all time extension conditions, as amended or updated, shall be binding on the "Applicant." The term "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. 2. This time extension is approved for three (3) years until July 1, 1998. The applicant may request another extension of time approximately forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 3. Additional Extensions of Time shall not be granted unless substantial compliance with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance is demonstrated by the applicant; otherwise the preliminary subdivision and the preliminary planned unit development approval will become null and void. 4. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #3. and #4.) The "Revised Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site Development Plan (PUD) of RIVERWALK" stamped "Received May 19, 1995," has been administratively approved and shall be the official preliminary plat of record and shall be the preliminary planned unit development. This May 19, 1995 revised plan includes 9.11 acres for a proposed commercial lot and 107.3 acres for a proposed planned unit development (PUD), being a total of 116.41 acres (see said plan map). The PUD proposes 365 single family lots. At the time of each Final PUD site development plan and Final Plat is submitted for each phase they shall comply with all development standards for the approved zone classifications, including the Planned Unit Development Overlay Zone, all as amended. (see 9. below) Note, at this point in time, no part of the preliminary plat/PUD have been finalized since the original 1982 approval. 5. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #34.) The above May 19, 1995 revised plan shows development phases. These phases may be administratively amended if the various agencies find that each proposed phase will provide proper traffic circulation, provide adequate emergency vehicle access, meet necessary utilities design and/or utility circulation requirements, and provide for the public health and safety. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 8 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 6. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #3.) The "Revised Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site Development Plan (PUD) of RWERWALK" stamped "Received May 19, 1995," now replaces: (1) the "Preliminary Plat of Record" map dated November 12, 1981, as approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 2, 1982, which consisted of 365 manufactured home lots and 1 commercial parcel and (2) the "Revised Preliminary Plat of Record" map dated March 15, 1983, as approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 14, 1983, which was a redesign of the 50.2 acre South portion (S1 /2) with 178 lots, excluding the commercial parcel. This S1 /2 also being the Final PUD Site Development Plan approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 14, 1983, is now NULL and VOID and is replaced with the above May 19, 1995, preliminary plat/PUD. Note, since the final plat for Phase 1 was submitted before the decision to approve the May 19, 1995, Revised Plan, Phase 1 may be finalized under the provisions of the April 14, 1983, Final PUD, S1 /2. 7. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #3.) A "Final PUD Site Development Plan" must be submitted and approved for at least the area of each proposed final plat prior to recording any Final Plat, other than Phase 1. This includes the S1/2 of RIVERWALK (previously Riverway Villa). Each "Final PUD" must substantially conform to the above May 19, 1995, revised preliminary plat/PUD and comply with the applicable development standards existing at the time of submittal. 8. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #4. and 6.) The approved zone change, ZE- 92 -81, shall be amended pursuant the PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT. The project area approved for the old approved Residential Mobil Home (RMH) Zone with the old PUD Overlay Zone shall be substituted with the present Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) Zone and the present PUD Overlay Zone. The project area approved for old Commercial (C) Zone shall be substituted with the present Community Business (B -2) Zone. The existing UR -3.5 Zone shall be reclassified as each phase of the development is recorded as a Final Plat with the County Auditor. The reclassifications shall be consistent with the proposed zoning approved with the preliminary plat of record, as amended by the PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT. 9. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #7 and #11.) The final plat(s) shall be designed substantially in conformance with the above "Revised Preliminary Plat of Record date stamped May 19, 1995." No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. Each Final Plat shall comply with the current development standards of the Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) Zone and the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay Zone, as each may be amended. The proposed commercial parcel shall comply with the current development standards of the Community Business (B -2) Zone, as amended. The entire site shall also comply with the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) overlay zone. 10. The Planning Director /designee shall review any proposed final plat and final Planned Unit Development Plan to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 11. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #5.) Prior to recording a final plat which includes the commercial parcel, Spokane County shall: a. insure that the commercial site is in compliance with the development standards of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended, b. insure that the commercial site is in compliance with the development standards of the Spokane County Road Standards, as amended, and d. insure that commercial uses do not exceed those of "neighborhood" and "local serving" type retail or service(s). 12. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #5.) Prior to issuing any building permits on the commercial parcel, a specific site development plan (all or part) shall be submitted to Spokane County. The specific site development plan will be circulated for comments from appropriate agencies to determine compliance with current regulations and for substantial compliance with the approved May 19, 1995, revised Plan and the conditions of approval. 13. A final plat name /number shall be proposed before the final plat is filed, such name /number to be approved by the Planning Director /designee. 14. Prior to filing of the final plat, the appropriate street address(es) shall be indicated. 15. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 9 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 16. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained. 17. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul -de -sac lots which meet or exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat. 18. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 19. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to Spokane County Planning prior to filing the final plat. 20. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 21. Spokane County Planning shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a TITLE NOTICE specifying a future land acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice may be released, in full or in part, only by Spokane County Planning. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as the recording of the Final Plat and shall provide the following, if applicable: a. At least 10 feet along Mission Avenue and 5 feet along Barker Road shall be designated as reserved future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities, in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right -of -way along Mission Avenue and Barker Road. NOTE: The County Engineer has required 10 feet of dedication along Mission Avenue and 15 feet of dedication along Barker Road. b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area. c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities. If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made. d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses. e. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future acquisition area. 22. Spokane County Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a TITLE NOTICE noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This TITLE NOTICE shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as the recording of the Final Plat and shall only be released, in full or in part, by Spokane County Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: The parcel of property legally described as [ ) is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on [ j, imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. I j is available for inspection and copying in Spokane County Planning. 23. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement for those lots located on a temporary cul de sac /stub road: Lot(s) , Block(s) are located on a temporary cul- de- sac/stub road. This temporary cul -de- sac /stub road may be extended to provide access to adjacent property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as development and/or circulation needs dictate. 24. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time and a Revised Preliminary Plat /PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 10 25. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 26. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision; and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot. 27. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state - licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat," including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as- built" water system. 28. The Water Plan and the above conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director /designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 29. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 30. Approval is required by the Planning Director /designee of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 31. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 32. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Planning Director /designee shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. 33. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #29.) The Final PUD site development plan shall indicate all exterior boundary setbacks, as well as setbacks from roadways and individual lot lines. 34. A copy of the homeowners /property owners' association articles of incorporation and/or bylaws and/or covenants and restrictions, together with any other provisions for maintenance of common areas and facilities, shall be submitted for review and approval to Spokane County Planning prior to finalizing. 35. The Owner shall negotiate with the Central Valley School District and the Spokane County Parks Department and submit a recorded copy of the agreement making provisions for public schools and parks prior to finalization and recording of this plat. The agreement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measure(s). The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement to purchase property within said plat pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (58.17.205), that appropriate provisions for school facilities and public parks must be made conditioned on a future agreement between the applicant/sponsor, school district, and County Parks Department. Voluntary agreements between the Owner and School District and Spokane County Parks Department shall conform to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 82.02. 36. The owner /applicant shall coordinate with the local Fire District and the Fire Marshall to insure that adequate access is provided for emergency services, prior to submitting each Final Plat phase. 37. Each final plat dedication shall make reference to the Home Owners Association agreements as a notice to potential lot purchaser of the responsibilities of lot ownership within the subdivision. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -8I / Page 11 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 38. The lots or common open space shown on the May 19, 1995, Revised Preliminary Plat that are within the 200 foot Shoreline boundary are required to comply with the Spokane County Shoreline Program regulation. The Final Plat shall show the 200 foot shoreline boundary. Each lot which includes the 200 foot boundary must have a buildable site that meets all required setbacks (both zoning and shorelines) before it is recorded as a Final Plat. Notes (at least 2) shall be placed on the Final Plan drawing near the affected lots and common open space which state: The property with the 200 foot Shoreline boundary has legal limitations on the use of this land pursuant vegetation and building of structures, including fences. 39. If a Final Plat is recorded with any lot partially within the 200 foot boundary of the Shoreline, a TITLE NOTICE shall be recorded by Spokane County Planning immediately after recording the Final Plat with the County Auditor. The TITLE NOTICE shall include a statement similar to: Any lot's property or common open space property within the 200 foot shoreline boundary have limitations on building structures (including fences) and changing the natural vegetation pursuant the SPOKANE COUNTY SHORELINE PROGRAM regulations. 40. After the commercial parcel is granted B -2 Zoning with the recording of a Final Plat, the applicant/owner should make application for a Binding Side Plan to allow for timely division and sale of portions of the commercial site after a Final Binding Site Plan is recorded. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Prior To Issuance Of A Building Permit Or Use Of The Property As Proposed: 1. All previously imposed conditions are still applicable. 2. The County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a PRINCIPLE Arterial and Mission Avenue as a MINOR Arterial. The existing right -of -way widths are not consistent with those specified in the Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan, in addition to the required right -of -way dedication, a strip of property 5 feet in width along Barker Road and 10 feet in width along Mission Avenue shall be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when arterial improvements are made to Barker Road and Mission Avenue. 3. As per the original conditions of approval: "A traffic analysis of each phase will be required of the developer and reviewed by Spokane County prior to plat finalization. This analysis will be coordinated with the State of Washington Department of Transportation. A traffic analysis for each phase will serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Should the analysis determine a need for intersection upgrading, the developer will be assessed a proportionate share for the required improvements. 4. Prior to any plat checking of Riverway Villa for phased finalization of the plat the aforementioned analysis shall be completed. 5. Intersection and road improvements shall be constructed and phased as follows predicated on an agreement reached on or about August 4, 1994, between North Idaho Engineering and the Spokane County Engineer. Barker Road: Phase I: Construct Barker/Indiana intersection (Barker Road to be a 5 -lane section per the County's Special section for Barker Road). Provide acceleration/deceleration lanes (sized per WSDOT Design manual), as well as inbound and outbound tapers. Phase II: Construct Barker Road north to the Spokane River, and south to Mission Avenue, unless built out sooner as part of Phase VI. Phase VI: Construct Barker Road north to the Spokane River, and south to Mission Avenue, unless built out sooner as part of Phase II. Mission Avenue: Phase I: Construct Mission/Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) intersection. Construct north side of Mission Avenue (per the County's Special Section for Mission Avenue) from Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) to Barker. Provide inbound taper to Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) intersection. Phase III: Construct Mission/Potomac and Mission/Yukon intersections. Construct north side of Mission Avenue (per the County's Special Section for Mission Avenue) along the Mission Avenue frontage from the easterly plat boundary to Mission/Clark Fork (Harmony Lane). Provide inbound taper to the widened Mission/Yukon intersection from east of the easterly plat boundary. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 12 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 6. Conditions of Approval require that Barker Road and Mission Avenue improvements adjacent to Phase VI are to be completed prior to issuance of a building permit for any projects on that parcel. 7. The aforementioned phasing is a minimum development program. Changes to this construction schedule may be implemented pending completion of the Traffic Impact Analysis for each phase of the development. 8. Engineers Condition #21 of April 2, 1982 Hearing Examiner Committee Findings and Order required that a strip of property 15 feet in width along Barker Road be dedicated from Mission Avenue to the Spokane River. Since a portion of this strip is not controlled by the applicant this requirement for dedication is not applicable. Right -of -way along Barker Road within the original approved plat shall be dedicated at the time of final plat approval or vesting of any commercial rezone Improvements to Barker Road from the Spokane River bridge on Barker to Mission Ave shall still be required with the existing right -of -way per a phasing plan to be agreed to by the developer and approved by the County Engineer. 9. Regarding the May 19, 1995, redesign Plan the following condition shall apply: (1) Temporary cul -de -sacs shall be constructed at the terminus of Indiana Avenue, Tippi Canoe Lane cannot be used as a public road turn- around and all other streets that provide access to more than one lot shall also provide an acceptable turn - around. (2) Improvements to proposed roadways shall be as outlined in the approved conditions of approval or as amended by the overall traffic analysis currently being completed. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 2. The dedication shall state: The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 365.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. Provided, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution under RCW 36.94. 3. Applicant will make connection to Public Sewer System. Sewer Connection Permit is required. 4. Plans and specifications for the public facilities are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. Spokane County plan submittal requirements apply. 5. The dedication shall state: The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 6. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 7. Applicant shall make connection to public sewer system. Sewer connection permit is required. Plans and specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: 'A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized." 2. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any attached sheets as noted. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 13 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 3. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by Spokane County Planning to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 4. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 6. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each lot of the plat. 8. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 9. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 10. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County /City of Spokane, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot/tract purchaser refused a building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 11. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. 12. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: The public water system, pursuant to the water plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building and Safety Department, and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot /tract prior to sale of each lot/tract and prior to issuance of a building permit for each tract. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS 1 The applicant shall contact the Division of Buildings at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include: ADDRESSING, FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS; FIRE HYDRANT/FLOW; APPROVED WATER SYSTEMS; BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY; CONSTRUCTION TYPE; OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION; EXITING; EXTERIOR WALL PROTECTION; AND ENERGY CODE REGULATIONS. (Note: The Division of Buildings reserves the right to confirm the actual address at the time of building permit.) WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF ANY FINAL PLAT: 1 . A traffic analysis shall be prepared for the Barker Road interchange and shall contain the following elements: a. Site Map (illustrating the complete circulation system) b. Vicinity Map(s) (illustrating traffic distribution) c. Existing Transportation Conditions 1. Existing average daily traffic 2. Existing AM and PM peak hour level of service 3. Existing AM and PM peak hour turning movements a June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 14 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 1. continued d. Projected Transportation Conditions with this Development 1. Projected Average Daily Traffic 2. Projected AM and PM peak hour level of service 3. Projected AM and PM peak hour turning movements e. Recommended mitigating measures 1 Mitigating measures sufficient to maintain existing Level of Service "D" 2. If the existing Level of Service "D" cannot be maintained a justification should be included NOTE: The TIE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual (5th Edition) shall be used as a basis to compute trip generation rates of the proposed developments. 2. That the applicant agree to fund and construct the necessary mitigating measures as outlined in the above traffic study. These mitigating measures must be approved by both WSDOT and Spokane County Engineers prior to the issuance of any building permits for this property. 3. Due to the trip generation potential, any further development other than what is proposed will require further review by WSDOT to assure additional trips are safely accommodated. COUNTY PARKS DEPARTMENT 1. To satisfy the requirements of RCW -58 -17 -110 that a subdivision make appropriate provisions for public parks, recreation and playgrounds, the owner, at his/her option, shall either dedicate land within the subdivision or enter into a voluntary agreement with Spokane County to mitigate the direct impacts that the subdivision has on public parks, open spaces and recreational facilities within the unincorporated areas of Spokane County. If the owner opts to enter into a voluntary agreement, the agreement shall be executed prior to the finalization and recording of the plat and recorded in conjunction therewith. the agreement shall be consistent with RCW 82.02.020 an substantially the same as the standardized agreement prepared by the Spokane County Parks, Recreation and Fair Department. Prior to finalization of the plat, the owner shall advise any purchaser of property, as authorized under RCW 58.17.205, of the obligations within the voluntary agreement. Additionally, the owner shall submit a recorded copy of said voluntary agreement to Spokane County Planning prior to finalization. r DATED THIS I ( + DAY OF N or ). , 19?- s /( \/ // Vt ,r71 / John Nunnery', Senior Planner, Under State Law and County Ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with the appropriate appeal fee, payable to the Spokane County Treasurer, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE- 1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 If you have any questions, please call the Spokane County Planning at 456 -2205. pc: County Division of Engineering and Roads Washington State Department of Transportation County Division of Utilities County Health District County Division of Buildings County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair Central Valley School District Fire District 1 Welco Group Inc, 1220 116th Ave, NE, Bellevue Wa North Idaho Engineering, W 4200 Seltice Way, Coeur Consolidated Irrigation District Richard Mason, IPEC, 707 W. 7th, Ste 200, Spokane 98004 D'Alene, ID, 83814 Wa 99204 Page 15 Memorandum Date: February 14, 1995 To: Spokane County Utilities Department (Jim Legat, P.E.) From: Development Engineering Services (Ed Parry, P.E.)�' Subjedt: P1414A - Riverwalk 2nd Addition 01414B - Riverwalk 3rd Addition 4k 1. This will confirm the agreement reached at our meeting today. 2. Given the status of the Final P.U.D. approval for the northerly portion of this project site (Phases 2 and 5), and that the requirement for completion of a traffic impact analysis for each phase of this project prior to any plat checking, I understand that the Utilities Department will not issue any plan approvals for utilities under their jurisdiction until land use actions and traffic impact analyses affecting the various phases are completed. This suspension may be communicated to the Developer in the County Engineer's letter to the Developer on this subject. 3. If this does not reflect your understanding of the results of our meeting, please let me know immediately, so that we may modify our letter to the Developer accordingly. If this does reflect your understanding of the results of our meeting, please initial the right -hand margin along paragraph 2. ROAD NAME NAME OF PLAT RIVERWALK 9TH ADDITION Plat# P1414H ADDRESS OF BLDG NAME OF BLDG PROJECT BLDG# B9 S 8 T 25 R 45 FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT # PROJECT LIMITS ROAD WIDTH ROAD SURFACE AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION $30.00 EXISTING CONDITIONS: (SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT) DATE Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count PROJECT DESCRIPTION RIVERWALK 9TH ADDITION IS A 10.88 ACRE PLAT CONSISTING OF 38 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 5 TRACTS. PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION HAMMERHEAD TURN AROUND AT THE EAST END OF SHANNON LANE. JUSTIFICATION: 11) SHANNON LANE IS A PRIVATE ROAD TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; PUBLIC USE WILL BE MINIMIZED. 2) PROVIDES ADEQUATE TURN A ROUND FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES - FIRE DISTRICT APPROVAL PENDING; VERBAL OK GIVEN 9/17/97. 3) THICKENED SIDEWALK SECTION PROVIDES SUPPORT FOR ADDITIONAL WEIGHT OF EMERGENCY VEHICLES. 4) WHEN SHANNON LANE IS EXTENDED TO THE EAST, THE TURN A ROUND COULD BE ELLIMINATED WITHOUT REMOVING /REPLACING CURB. 5) PAVED CURB TURN A ROUND IS AMENITY TO AFFECTED LOTS. SUBMITTED BY INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. DATE SEPTEMBER 16, 1997 ADDRESS 707 WEST 7TH AVENUE, SUITE 200, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON ZIP CODE 99204 PHONE# (509) 458 -6840 (509)458 -6844 (FAX) lapktWeigndev V93 or sr DATE 9-cza ./997 ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF $30.00 PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY * * * * * ** 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260 -0170 PHONE (509)456 -3600 FAX (509)324 -3478 (079991 c - RED S . LNOT BE., VIEWED WITHOUT FUNDS- SEPTEMBER 16, 1997 CRP/RID # PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: 31' WI PAVED WIDTH; TYPE "R" CURB ACP OVER CSTC 380 a2EQ MEG MEG b &fi '4 / / Saau[2u3 Munoj aUEJIOds p. 1aam2II3 simnel ( ) .[aaui2ug luamaBEaeyy loafoid panoaddy 1oN anoce papuammoaa.[ se panoiddy () ) panoiddy l0N saompaoo /m panol y pano.[ddy Sa`dEOEJi laaF07d WOLLvIIl30 117190 ( ) panoiddy ION ( ) pa l°N ( S6/6 saoprpuoa ou /m pa /middy :NIOLLVNIIMIEELLIIQ S,lfl NIION21 LLN flOO IINVNOdS ) ( ) SuoglpUoo /m panolddy pa /middy C" 1-1,/bz /6 Z r'7/_7 roI Gt9n'*0- S7101.1_ air 0c 4 ZA%77 — Lb POE) 4c+ w^% 1q1.4 _ U saoUTpuoa /m pa /middy .panoiddy c w X99 ' &I` h - e '.t�C cr3/4 •'4 W S ,z rvj 1VO ca 4 trais.1 '3 1 j'J " o Ng- Qra3 $NIOLLVUN arnimaaa &DLLS Dear Susan: DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer • October 2, 1997 Susan Murphy, E.I.T. Inland Pacific Engineering Inc. 707 West 7th, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Subject: Riverwalk 9 Addition Design Deviation dated Sept. 16, 1997 Spokane County Project No. P -I4I4H Conditions of approved Design Deviation • The rum around shall be a minimum of 15 ft. paved width. Sincerely, Spokane County Div. of Engineering & Roads • d - Dean Franz P E Plans Review Coordinator /Engineer end: Design Deviation (approved 9/30/97) cc: Mike Klika - Project Sponsor Project file C o U N T Y • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis NI. Scott, P.E., Director The Design Deviation application, requesting the use of hammerhead turnarounds. has been approved subject to the conditions listed below. Hammerhead turnarounds or a cul-de -sac is required wherever a public or private street extends a distance of more than one lot from an interchange. • The Sponsor acquire approval from the Fire District. {Note: already completed.; • The turn- around be placed within an easement granted to the homeowner's association. responsible for maintaining said turn- around A copy of the completed Design Deviation document is enclosed for your records. If you have any questions or comments feel free to call us at 456 -3600. 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 MD: (509) 324-3166 r DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Cc: Project File • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director Memorandum I recommend approval of this Design Deviation with the Conditions that c) The turn- around shall be a minimum of 15 ft. paved width. Date: September 29, 1997 To: Bill Hemmings From: Dean Franz, P E .lam Development Services Dept. Project: Riverwalk 9 Addition Subject: Design Deviation (P- 141411) dated 9/16/97 for Hammerhead Turn - around The Sponsor's engineer proposes a hanunerhead turnaround for a private road to be located within Rivenvalk 9 Addition, as shown in the enclosed exhibit. a) the Sponsor acquire approval from the Fire District. {Note: already completed, see enclosed letter from District. } b) The turn- around be placed within an easement granted to the homeowner's association, responsible for maintaining said turn- around 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT Spokane County Fire District 1 10319 EAST SPRAGUE AVE • SPOKANE WA 99206 -3676 • (509) 929 -1700 • FAX (509) 992 -4125 R. Pat Humphries cNet Dean Franz Division of Engineering and Roads 1026 W. Broadway Ave Spokane, WA 99260 RE: Riverwalk 9th Addition Dear Mr. Franz: September 25, 1997 The Spokane Valley Fire Department has received a road plan depicting apparatus turnarounds that meet our requirements. Since ly, KM /md cc: Susan Murray Inland Pacific Engineering vir{Miller Fire Inspector I INLAND PA EN CIFIC GINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458 -8844 a L 44 1- F sired /5 3 . Tcadar SCALE: 1 " =20' DATE: 09/16/97 ACCOUNT HOW PAID BEGINNING BALANCE CASH PAID UNT �r Ili CHECK /�, /11/' DUE DUE MONEY ORDER L A O WiyoNUea..9E9 DATE RECEIVED FROM Ad INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. Spokane, WA 99204 Vendor SP0008 r INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. PAY TO THE ORDER OF 707 W. 7th AVE., SUITE 200 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99204 (509) 458 -6840 FOR SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS ** *THIRTY AND NO /100 DOLLARS * ** SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS T •'T.r.. rye•`.. ter.... ..�. 2-=4N I : 1 2 5 100089 100976414311' II'01298911' E El 72 an WASHINGTON TRUST BANK m y Spokane. Washington 99210 -2127 28 -8/1251 Check 12989 Date 09/22/97 DATE 09/22/97 PT N 9950 9 8 R DOLLARS D d j / /._ AUTHORIZED SIGNATUPE Check: 12989 12989 PO Num Invoice 96238 Inv Date 09/22/97 Inv Amt 30.00 Amt Paid 30.00 'Disc Amt 0.00 Net Amt 30.00 NET CHECK 30.00 PtaO9H.L -Them NDB iOB.T1E90001YEtMamm1Qi9tlIMMMO YV1 Cdi M1V zsam M IiM.LSRbST.!•" 12989 AMOUNT 30.00 )e S P U K A N E ��" :!;.a'' !' �,. ;'�u 3 C C7 U N T Y OFFICE OF - Ft IE COUNTY ENGINEER • Ronald C. I lorma nn, P.E., County Engineer ENGINEER'S AGREEMENT NUMBER whose interest in the project is (�vt i.e. owner, agent, etc.) known as: . U.D. Rawest' a ress or I ename : I e nun AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES (PRINT NAME) This agreement between Spokane County and name person) The monthly billing should he sent to the attention of: J NAME: �p /��?qx/ / lW ity. , � /7411/10e4:. ADDRESS: an -2D A.lE Ii CITY, STATE: Oa:,upw/5 \&IA. c3$OTZ ZIP CODE: PHONE #: RETURN YELLOW COPY TO SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS k\p \t\agreemen. fee 2/1/95 A DIVISION OF TI IE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director is entered into this 3% day of Tuv-r 19 9S. This agreement is applicable to the project That the individuals and parties named herein as having an interest in the above described property or project agree to the following: I . Reimburse Spokane County for project review and inspection fees as specified in Chapter 9.14 of the Spokane County Code. The fees will be based on actual salary costs incurred by Spokane County for project reviews and / or inspections plus a ten percent administrative charge, and will be billed monthly as accrued. Any billing amounts due, including any expenses incurred in the collection of an overdue account, must be paid prior to the County's acceptance of the project for filing. If a project is approved and /or filed with a balance still owing, the unpaid balance shall be paid within 30 days of the invoice date. 2. The undersigned agrees that these fees are due and payable upon receipt of the billing as specified above. Any invoices not paid within 30 days of the invoice slate will be considered delinquent. If any outstanding balance on the account for this project is not paid within 30 days of the invoice date, no further reviews of the project documents will be conducted until the entire account balance is paid. Any balance on the account for this project not paid within 65 days of the invoice date may result in legal action or the initiation of other collection procedures, including referral to a collection agency. The Sponsor will be liable for any and all expenses incurred by the County for the collection of overdue accounts. (ztx:) S&1- Cs[v 10 I understand that failure to pay these fees may result in delay in completion or approval of the project or other possible sanctions. ❑ If this fee agreement is completed by someone other than the Sponsor (i.e., the project owner or a principal in the firm sponsoring the project); such as the Engineer designing the project, then written authorization from the Sponsor specifically authorizing the Agent to execute this Fee Agreement is attached to this Fee Agreement. SIGNATURE By: Ei Lep tor'tO D cst . 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX (509) 324 -3478 'PDD: (509) 324 -3166 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL PROJECT #: Description: Purpose Remarks 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: Spokane County Engineers Office 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, Wa. 99260 -0170 ATTENTION: Ed Parry, P.E. No. Copies Description 2 Agreement to pay fees %►_ Signed: Bruce A. Howard, E.I.T. cc: file PROJECT #::95580, 95 PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk 2nd and 3rd Additions DATE: August 8, 1995 I.P.E C ❑ Prints ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Copies of app. plans ❑ Original Drawing ❑ Contract Documents ❑ ❑ Work Authorization ❑ Drainage Report • Agreement to pay fees • Information ❑ Review & Comments ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Written Approval ❑ Signature & Return ❑ Ed- Please replace the fax copies of the agreement to pay fees with these originals. If you need any further information, or have questions, please feel free to call me at our office. AUG 0 0 1995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 01/2J/95 11:15 x .$Qa 3247475 S P O iC A N li orrice or The C.ot*n ENtarteaa • Ronald t'. Ilmmann, 1'.E., County Engineer NAME: ADDRESS: CITY, STATE: ZIP CODE.: l'IIONE B: COUNTY ENGINEERS SIGNATURE By: '4 — n-d • (PRINT NAME) RFT(IRtYEIJ.OW COPY TO SPOKANE COVN1Y N MNFrRS syw ands W. 1026 arnviwny A•.. Simkans, WA 90260.0170 C U U NI '1' V A MvrsaoN ante rustic Wens Ders11774ENT Dennis M. $colt, P.E., Director Ire 002 AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES ENGINEER'S AGREEMENT NUMBER P IN /1/ This agreement between Spoknne County and n.42 SG2kan.e !L• P whose interest in the project is __1.l.bpie ' one I is entered into this 6tk day of Fehr-oarts , 19 95. This agreement is applicable to the project known as: �I'y/'�)I/C � A ' .J � • llno$C taure dlUtafar� -I lta,aaer / " / r �L'D' / 7' / D 1/Y That the individuals and parties named herein as having an interest in the ahnve described property or project agree to the following: 1. Reimburse. Spokane County for project review and inspection fees as specified in Chapter 9.14 of the Spokane County Code. The fees will he based on actual salary casts incurred by Spokane County for project reviews and / or inspections plus a ten percent administrative charge, and will be hilted monthly as accrued. Any final billing amounts, to include any late fees or any other expenses incurred in the collection of an overdue account must be paid prior to the County's acceptance of the project for filing. 2. The undersigned agrees that these fees arc due and payable upon receipt of the billing as specified above. 3. Any Invoices not paid within 3(1 days of the invoice date will be subjected to a late fee charge of 1% per month (12% per year) on the unpaid balance of the account and any accrued late fee charges. In addition, if any outstanding balance nn the account for this project is not paid within 30 days of the invoice date, no further reviews of the project documents will be conducted until the entire account balance is paid. Any balance on the account for this project not paid within 65 days of the invoice date may result In legal action or the initation of other collection procedures, including referral to a rolleelinn a grimy. The Sponsor will he liable for any and all expenses incurred by the County for the collection of overdue acco 4. The monthly billing should he sent in the attention of: Stan70 n S h.P. 167L0 .0.E. / /4 f kec ninsnc , 1.4 )4 Z06 - ed 9- 6612 I understand that failure to pay these fees may result In delay in completion or approval of the project or other possible sanctions. Q If this fee agreement Is completed by someone other than the Sponsor (i.e., the project owner or a principal in the firm sponsoring the project), such as the Engineer designing the project, then written authnrlzallon from the SIXminr specWually authorizing the Agent to execute this Fee Agreement is attached to this Fee Agreement. (SNf) 156.3Rrte FAX (500) 456 -4715 1. ILL -31 -1995 14 a3 INLAND PACIFIC ENG S P O K A N E Oven of THE CAavtr ENCOJEFt • Ronald C. tlormenn. P.E. County Engineer AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES ENGINEER'S AGREEMENT NUMBER _ P (444s This agreement between Spokane County and whose Interest in the project is is entered into this 31 day of te r C O U N T Y A Dwty(w co n iv Puouc Wotes DCPA &T INT Dennis M. Scott. 1'.E.. Director , 19 e kr. This agreement is applicable Cu the project known as: (� r 4r num That the individuals and parties named herein as having an interest in the above described property or project agree to the following: ro Reimburse Spokane County for project review and inspection fees as specified in Chapter 9.14 of the Spokane County Code. The fees will be based on actual Minty eons incurred by Spokane County for project reviews and ( or inspections plus a ten percent administrative charge, and will be billed monthly as accrued. Any billing amounts due, including any expenses incurred in the collection of an overdue account, oust be prior to the County's acceptance of the project for filing. 1 a paid with a balance still owing, the unpaid balance shall be paid within 30 days of the invoice date. 2. The undersigned agrees that these tits are due and payable upon receipt of the billing as specified above 3. Any invoices not paid within 30 days of the invoice date will be considers delinquent. If any outstanding balance on the account for ibis project is not paid within 30 days of the invoice dale no further reviews of the project documents will be conducted until the entire account balance Is paid. Any balance on the account for this ro• P )io not paid within 65 days of the invoice date may result in legal o aag or the Sponsor of other er collection procedures, including referral to a collection agency. The Sptmsor will be liable for any and all expenses incurred by the County for the collection of overdue accounts. 4. The monthly billing should be sent to the attention of: /I NAME: Gp f t bins ata/totcc ADDRESS: /Dent) Air ilia <n em- CITY, STATE: 2e.oc 4 14• 98DSa ZIP CODE: PHONE P. (acts ) RfoQ— c.e oI i I understand that failure to pay these fees may result in delay in completion or approval of the project or other possible sanctions. El If this fee agreement is completed by someone other than the Sponsor (i.e. the project owner or a principal in the firm sponsoring the project), such as the Engineer designing the project, then written authorization from the Sponsor specifically authorizing the Agent to execute this Fee Agreement is attached to this Fee Agreement. SIGNATURE By: Sr Z'24 tnre — 5 Per <A_4-1 (. P (PRINT NAME) / RETURN YELLOW COPY TO 4)vrtrc tune r• NTY v INNERS 1Wngtcdacn.ftc 1m93 1026 W Broadway Ave. • Spokane WA 99260.0170 • (509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3471 't t)D (509) 324 3166 P.02 I p 14v4 ( AueP Wc&ik 3 R STATISTICS DATE I Nat Check Fee .1 7 --9y t 04-etke, Pc9 -7C .--Pc't 2- Crk Number of Lots /eQ Road Miles (New) Ai 4 Total Area MAP North Arrow crC Scale r Legend ri-c Procedures & Equipment Lb Basis of Bearings ■ h 0 e 1 4 A or e CA- Location By Title Ck_ Plat 5 , t Official Signature Blocks ( k it) Surveyors Certificate Road Names ----------C-414 Road Widths cl-t Adjacent Area Lot & Block Numbers N R/W Dedication designated , ; yr 1 1 Foot Strips 3 RPS on GLO Corners Tract X Lot Areas Bench Mark Closure eser rat cr<sybovvt-Imc. DEDICATION I Description (To Map) /-4±tininica5 Description (To Cert) Owners , Certificate to Plat 1 Foot Strips , Al A.Ant r e Ai r rf Aasti:a"Aniallralg , A ) a RID - CPR Statement At 4 /4 Access Prohibited R/W Dedication Drainage Language f12-- N A N/A- Drainage Covenant # C all:Clie- itieed 9Coo /0300,53 / Flood Insurance • Stormwater Management 208 Bonds - $1,000.00 ea 208 PLANS APPROVED / / - Private Road Doc. N's freeD Private Road Warning (re. Road Plans Neers J/ - /3- , 3 crk Bond Road Impro "2-, - 7 % CA 4-3 -su Signed By Engineer 0 ,,,,, ,1 Cie 4-0 St9 A) k ( ili t ex - % A C /0 1 1 / 4 ° 'W gei 7 Ic\d \f\placlisick .,,,/e!..••/A'r.v sag •.•/.■ !./1/.,s7/S4 • T.:7 _ a' ea.ard • /1/ I ry fr. I aIRW - as_ Q REVIEW COMMENTS SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING & ROADS 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260 -0710 PHONE (509)456 -3600 FAX (509)324 -3478 SUBMITTAL #: 1 (Record Drawings) REVIEWER: Ed Parry PROJECT #: P141413 DATE: 11 February 97 PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk 3rd Addition GENERA!, ITEMS: 1. Has the Fire District approved the revisions for the Salmon River Lane configuration? 2. Have all punchlist items identified by the Construction Engineer been completed? 3. The wording "or my agent" is acceptable only on this project. Since the County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction do not include these words, they should not be included on Record Drawing submittals for future projects. Sheet 4R: 1. Detail at pond A2 should be coordinated with the revised layout for Salmon River Lane. 2. The County will be able to conduct a final inspection on pond A2 and C2 when the irrigation systems have been installed and the swale vegetation has been established 01/21/95 11:15 Teen') 3243478 COUNTY ENGINEERS lig 002 . S P O K A N s. {.. � N. ;n• _IT .. } C O LJ N 's V A rhvtnQN Of Tile rustic Worms DerAlnaterr Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director OMR Of Tile COUNTY ENCINEEt1 • Rnnald C tintnlann, 1'.E., County Engineer AGREEMENT TO PAY PEES ENGINEER'S AGREEMENT NUMBER PIN / E') This agreement between Spokane County and _ L• r. whose interest in the project Is -- pt. ) s 4, e,e 1 is entered into this 6 1-1^ day of Fehrl.gr, , 19 9S. This agreement is applicable to the project known as: rd r J ) tt",yect s am8s BIYRI t /,4 (a� {,cart / / !/lJ 1 () V1 That the individuals and parties named herein as having an interest In the ahnve described property or project agree to the following: 1. Reimburse Spokane County for project review and inspection fees as specified in Chapter 9.14 of the Spokane County Code. The fees will he hosed on actual salary costs incurred by Spokane County for project reviews and / or inspections plus a ten percent administrative charge, and will he hilted monthly as accrued. Any final billing amounts, to Include any late fees or any other expenses incurred in the collection of an overdue account must be paid prior to the County's acceptance of the project for filing. 2. The undersigned agrees that these fen are Jule and payable upon receipt of the billing as specified above. 3. Any Invoices not paid within 30 days of the invoice date will be subjected to a late fee charge of 1% per month (12% per year) on the unpaid balance of the account and any accrued late fee charges. In addition, if any outstanding balance an the account for this project is not paid within 30 days of the invoice date, no further reviews of the project documents will be conducted until the entice account balance is paid. Any balance on the account for this project not paid within 65 days of the invoice date may result In legal action or the inflation of other collection procedures, including referral In a rollretinn agency. The: Sponsor will he liable for any and all expenses incurred by the County for the collection of overdue. accounts. 4. The monthly billing shnuld he Rent to the attention of: NAME: Stan 710 n ��11 _c nkane h.P. ADDRESS: 16 7Z0 N. E . 114 ti ' CITY, STATE: RQd m /1 /1 I .t4 z►P CODE: 80$2 PHONE.#: 206 — 86 `' 46/9 • I understand that failure to pay these fees may result in delay in completion or approval of the project or other possible sanctions. ❑ If this fee agreement Is completed by someone other than the Sponsor (i.e., the project owner or a principal In the firm sponsoring the project), such as the Engineer designing lite project, then written euihndvtnon from the Sponsor specifically authorizing the Agent to execute this Fee Agreement is attached to this Fee Agreement. SIGNATURE Ely: `"".` { ..� -- -- Pn—gri JW /4 n - d Q 4. (PRINT NAME) - RFTIIRI'j_YFIJ.QW COPY TO srol ANF COUfIfl I_,pl+ JjNEERS W. 1026 Maisons Ave. Spoken*, WA 90260.0170 (5110) e56.]6nn FAX 1500) 456.4715 known as: 01/23/95 11:15 2X.509 3243478 COUNTY ENGINEERS S P O K A NE OFEICE 07 TIIE COUNTY ENCINEIK • Rnnahl l'. llmmann, 1'.E., County Engineer AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES ENGINEER'S AGREEMENT NUMBER P I 0-J 3 This agreement between Spokane County and a j,, n? �• P. r r rs^n t whose interest in the project is- 1Q6*ri 5_i is entered into this Ci tl. day of FP bruar j 19 9S. This agreement is applicable to the project 14/444S) 47127` i nn Waxen mw r n That the individuals and parties named herein as having an interest in the ahnve described property or prnject agree to the following: 1. Reimburse. Spokane County for project review and inspection fccs as specified in Chapter 9.14 of the Spokane County Code. The fccs will he based on actual salary costs incurred by Spokane County for project reviews and / or inspections plus a ten percent administrative charge, and will be hulled monthly as accrued. Any final billing amounts, to include any late fees or any other expenses incurred in the collection of an overdue account must be paid prior to the County's acceptance of the project for fling. 2. 7l1c undersigned agrees that these fccs are due and payable upon receipt of the billing as specified above. 3. Any invoices not paid within 30 days of the invoice date will be subjected to a late fee charge of 1% per month (12% per year) un the unpaid balance of the account and any arsnled late fee charges. In addition. if any outstanding halanre on the account for this project is not paid within 30 days of the invoice date, no further reviews of the project documents will be conducted until the eulite account balance is paid. Any balance on the account for this project not paid within 65 days of the invoice date may result in legal action or the inflation of other collection procedures, including referral lo a imilectinn army. the Sponsor will he liable for any and all expenses incurred by the County for the collection of overdue arconnls. 4. The monthly billing should be sent In the nttentinn NAME: Stan /On .4okin . P. ADDRESS: CITY, STATE: ZIP CODE: PHONE #: /6 7Z0 %). E . 114 i-L 20en1nNd, /AM 9 � 5 206 - 06 9- 66/51 I understand that failure to pay these fees may result in delay in completion or approval of the project or other possible sanctions. 0 If this fee agreement is completed by someone other than the Sponsor (i.e., the project owner or a prindpal In the firm sponsoring the project), such as the Engineer designing the project, lhcn written autitnrizalinn from the Sponsor specifically authorizing the Agent to execute this Fee Agreement is attached to this Fee Agreement. SIGNATURE Ely: �i4LV Awn e) W. 1026 nmadwny Ave. (PRINT NAME) - REJURN YEI.I.QW COPY TO SPOKANE COIJNTY_K1VGjNEER NpIA.pt.ms tea pews] A rhvorQN 077115 P%IIt C Woexa DEPARTMEpa Dennis M. $.all, P.E., Dltednr ®002 Spokane, WA 99260.0170 (S 156 - it0n FAX (509) 456 -4715 ofntl/a- Fz% u. /X-ivaccr4 - -- - —' —° -co._ _Err.; Or R.. - -- - BtCtr - Nltz. - par ty S S kt T - 2CPt 15 oeovvd J w 4 (//. bbl _k'g a�f ac/( 9601030055 DECLARATION OF COVENANT In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of P1414B, RIVERWALK P.U.D., 3RD ADDITION (hereinafter referred to as the "Plat "), the undersigned covenants and agrees that: 1. The subdivider /sponsor will construct the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 2. A lot is served by the private road when: (a) the only road frontage for the lot in the Development is on the private road; or (b) a lot having frontage on more than one road (public or private) constructs an approach to the private road. 3. THE RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or its successors in interest shall maintain the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 4. The owner(s) of any lot created by the Plat or alteration thereof and served by a private road shall be responsible for maintenance of said private road, including associated drainage facilities, in conromance with approved plans on file with the County Engineer's Office. 5. Maintenance financing of the private roads and associated drainage facilities shall be in a manner determined by RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or their successors in interest. 6. Should RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION be terminated for any reasons, the successors in interest shall be the individual lot owners, or theft successors in interest, who are members of RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION at the time of said termination. 7. In the event such private road including associated drainage facilities is improved to Spokane County standards for public streets, and the County is willing to accept the dedication of such road and drainage facilities, each lot owner shall execute any documents necessary to accomplish such dedication. 8. Owners of lots within the Plat who are served by such road, may sue and recover damages and attorneys' fees from any owner of any lot within the Plat which is similarly served who refuses to participate in the road and drainage facilities construction, financing, and maintenance. 9. WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, or maintain or otherwise service the private roads and associated drainage facilities contained within or providing service to the property described in this Plat. By accepting this Plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued for property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road or its associated drainage facilities. 10. Spokane County is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all private roads and /or drainage easement, for the purpose of inspection and emergency maintenance of drainage swales, and any other drainage facilities, if not property maintained by the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, or their successors in interest. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect and maintain the drainage easements or drainage swales, nor does the County accept any liability for failure by the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, or their successors in interest to properly maintain such areas. 11. The lot owners within this Plat shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface path of natural or man -made drainage flow over and across their respective properties. 12. The lot owner or his representative shall inform each succeeding purchaser of all drainage easement on the property and of his responsibility for maintaining surface drainage paths and swales within said easements. 1 COPY ORIGINAL RED OR RECORDED JAN 0• 3 1996 Cum. i .+vu;wn SPOKANE COUNTY, VON, 13. The RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, or their successors in interest, shall maintain all water quality treatment swales ( "208" swales ") and drainage ditches situated within this Plat, and any portion of a 208 swale situated in the public right -of -way adjacent to this Plat, with a permanent ground cover as specified on the current approval plans on file with the County Engineer's Office. The RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, or their successors in interest, may install approved shrubbery and /or trees which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the 208 swales and drainage ditches, as indicated by the current approved plans on file with the County Engineer's Office. 14. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas, nor the responsibility for any drainage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. 15. Whenever the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or their successors in interest fail to maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved drainage plan, a notice of such failure may be given to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or their successors in interest, by the County. If not corrected within the period indicated on said notice, the County has the right to correct the maintenance failure or to have it corrected at the expense of the Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest. 16. Any building that is constructed on a lot in this Plat shall be set at such an elevation so as to provide positive drainage away from any drainage entry point to the building (including but not limited to a window well, a window unprotected by a window well, or a doorway). Said positive drainage shall consist of a minimum slope of 3% away from the building for a distance of at least 10 feet from the building. The lots shall be graded so that either a) all runoff is routed away from the building, and conveyed over the lot to a natural drainage swales or approved drainage facility, or b) drainage intercepted on the lots is disposes of on the lot in an approved drainage facility. The approved drainage facility shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file at the County Engineer's Office. Any revisions to the approved drainage plans must be approved by the County Engineer's Office prior to construction of said revisions. 17. This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road and drainage facilities as provided herein. Dated this day of , 19 . STANTON - SPOKANE L.P., A Washington Limited Partnership BY: STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A Washington General Partnership ITS General Partner BY: HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A Washington Corporation, Partner BY: BY: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, A Washington Corporation Partner BY: wLia .tL. ITS pre � ti s ITS l 0/2-4-5 4 2 STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss County of ee „vy ) On this / 9 ''day of ZEeffsidi.c , 19 Ss, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared Et•✓a,CL AI 4-/v , to me known to be the /°.eLs /L rA) of DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, and partner of STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Washington General Partnership who is the General Partner of STANTON- SPOKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss County of R,m /e ) On this o' mday of hr r &Ka E.,e , 19 y before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared /dent 4 1- 0 uste'i to me known to be the /°R £siS S.SSof HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, and partner of STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Washington General Partnership who is the General Partner of STANTON- SPOKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. NOTARY PU I m and for the State of Washington, residing at z. v--'- vizA/Ale, M My commission expires , - is-- - S c. ,11111ICi f. ^A. r, 3 2A \ \ ,,;, oN "' ' 9 4,F�\ F� S; 4 NOT - �^ 30 -- • - V —• P UBLIC , :'/J, 4, . G.15.96 •. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 3 NOTAJTY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at tyN ' .'o, My commission expires 6 -/r -S/ Parcel No's. 55083.9010 & 55083.9052 Indiana Avenue No. 1689 "D" P 1414 951 2140151 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING Spokane County, Washington DRAINAGE EASEMENT of the County of King State of Washington, Benefits, the receipt of which is to Riverwalk Owners Association of the County to the County of Spokane, State of Washington„ an the following described real property situated Washington, The Riverwalk Owners Association DEPARTMENT The Grantors) STANTON- SPOKANE LP, a Washington Limited Partnership ' C ERO{ L ft» U,r; k;f WQ L04:.p}i'35 • 401 OR Src•'.AII E P U ST WASH. VOL aine 1 SO5 PAGE 9O for and in consideration of Mutual hereby acknowledged, grants of Spokane, State of Washington and Easement over, under, and across in the County of Spokane, State of That portion of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter and Government Lot 5, of Section 8, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M., County of Spokane, State of Washington, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of Tract "H" of RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION according to the plat recorded in Book 23 of Plats, Pages 37 though 40; thence N.60 °00'02 "E. along the easterly prolongation of the north line of said Tract "H" a distance of 7.65 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing N.60 °00'02 "E. a distance of 82.50 feet; thence N.29 °58'58 "W. a distance of 6.50 feet; thence 5.60 °00'02 "W. a distance of 82.50 feet; thence 5.29 °59'58 "E. a distance of 6.50 feet to the True Point of Beginning. The Grantor will construct the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plane on file in the County Engineers office. This EASEMENT grants to Riverwalk Owners Association the right of ingress and egress to, over, and from said EASEMENT for the purpose of constructing, inspecting, and maintaining the drainage ways and facilities in conformance with the approved plan. or their successors in interest .,shall maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the Engineers Office. Maintenance financing of the drainage facilities shall be in a manner determined by Riverwalk Owners Association or their successors in interest. Should Riverwalk Owners Association be terminated for any reason, the successors in interest shall be the individual lot owners, or their successors in interest, who are members of the Riverwalk Owners Association at the time of said termination. In the event such private drainage facilities are improved to Spokane County standards, and the County is willing to accept the dedication of such drainage facilities, each lot owner shall execute any documents necessary to accomplish such dedication. Spokane County is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to, over, and from the above described property. INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL TO: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ATTENTION: Dave Berto PROJECT #: PE -1414 Description: Purpose Remarks Signed: 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -6844 9561W PROJECT NAME: RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION DATE: December 13. 1995 LP E.C. PROJECT #:€ ❑ Xerox Prints ❑ Copy of Letter • Filed Easement ❑ Original Drawing ❑ Contract Documents ❑ ❑ Report ❑ Declaration of Coy. 0 No. Copies Description 1 Copy of Filed Temporary Turnaround Easement • Information ❑ Review & Comments ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Written Approval ❑ Signature & Return ❑ Dave - Enclosed please find a copy of the filed temporary turnaround easement for the above referenced final plat. I am securing the Sewer Easement. Thank you. RECE WED DEC 1 3 1995 SPOI(Ai4E COUNTY ENGINEER cOPV In the matter of Michielli Lane, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the Grantor, STANTON - SPOKANE L.P.. A Washington Limited Partnership for and in consideration of Mutual Benefits, the receipts of which is hereby acknowledged, grants to the Riverwalk Owners Association, A Homeowners Association as created by document recorded July 25, 1995 under State UBI Number 601 -645- 799, an Easement over, upon and across the temporary turnaround, legally described as follows: R. E. Excise Tax Exempt Date DeC . Spokane County Trea s 9512120284 TEMPORARY TURNAROUND EASEMENT A Temporary Turnaround Easement over a portion of Government Lots 5 and 6, of Section 8, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M., County of Spokane, State of Washington, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of Tract "H" of RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION according to the plat recorded in Book 23 of Plats, Pages 37 thought 40; thence N.60 °00'02 "E. a distance of 33.99 feet; thence N.29 °59'43 "W. a distance of 153.03 feet; thence N.60 °00'17 "E. a distance of 25.24 feet; thence N.29 °59'43 "W. a distance of 110.00 feet; thence N.60 °00'17 "E. a distance of 194.98 feet; thence N.04 °05'24 "E. a distance of 35.04 feet; thence N.09 °04'41 "W. a distance of 49.14 feet; thence N.80 °55'19 "E. a distance of 57.30 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; continuing N.80 °55'19 "E. a distance of 52.70 feet; thence N.85 °03'01 "E. a distance of 35.10 feet; thence N.80 °55'19 "E. a distance of 62.30 feet; thence N.09 °04'41 "W. a distance of 150.00 feet; thence 5.80 °55'19 "W. a distance of 150.00 feet; thence 5.09 °04'41 "E. a distance of 147.47 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Said Temporary Turnaround Easement is hereby granted to Riverwalk Owner's Association, until such time as Michielli Lane continues and the areas of the easement has been platted, at which time the Temporary Turnaround Easement will be terminated. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed on this F3 day of DetezerYL , 1995 1 copy OP;G'NAI F RECORDED DEC 1 2 1995 vuuni1 Ault UH SPOKANE COUNTY, WN. STANTON - SPOKANE L.P., A Washington Limited Partnership BY: STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A Washington General Partnership ITS General Partner STATE OF WASHINGTON County of x4v5 BY: HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A Washington Corporation, Partner BY: BY: ITS )ss U de\ pre, BY: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, A Washington Corporation Partner ITS f & 4617Th ACKNOWLEDGMENTS On this grit day of , , 199k-, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared Eaw.9,ea .FAnJ , to me known to be the P.fstoe.vr of DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, and partner of STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Washington General Partnership who is the General Partner of STANTON - SPOKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and /fof the State of Washington, residing at- Spekaneepwww My commission expires c - tf - 5'c 2 STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss County of k„ye, On this Ar» day of DFcF,wes#e , 19 %- , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared igg,ANN Na Ksce y , to me known to be the / WC/Z ENr of HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, and partner of STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Washington General Partnership who is the General Partner of STANTON - SPOKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and fo the State of Washington, residing at $pekaneLvvvwoad My commission expires , ./s- _SG 3 November 28, 1995 Vet w ' 8J) From: Development Engineering Services RE: Language for P.U.D. Plat Dedication & Covenants Project #P1414A, Riverwalk 2nd Addition (ems oars A:awlion) or its successors in interest. (HOME OWNERS ASSOCIA I ION) which by reference is made a part hereof. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Spokane County, Washington P 14 48 The private roads and /or common areas shown on this plat are hereby dedicated to the created by document recorded under (date) Auditor's document number The private roads, as shown hereon, are easements which provide a means of ingress and egress for those lots within the Plat having frontage thereon. The private roads and /or common areas cannot be sold or transferred, regardless of any provisions in the covenants to the contrary, without express approval by Spokane County, and shall be considered subservient estates for tax purposes to the other lots created herein. Drainage easements, as platted and shown hereon, which are for the purpose of installing, operating, and maintaining drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted to the This Plat is subject to the separate DECLARATION OF COVENANT as recorded under Rine) Auditor's Document No. {WARNING: The draft covenant must be approved by the County Engineer's Office PRIOR to recording the covenant!} I'Cense lea) The Sr4ni ED loYmJMJIS 7a &fie &Any 1E 126 ec4a'- 4. %Ai eA eke met f RIJ +hAe- 34 (I 4 4) DECLARATION OF COVENANT In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of P1414A, Riverwalk P.U.D., 2nd Addition, (hereinafter referred to as the "Plat "), die undersigned covenants and agrees that: 1. The subdivider /sponsor will construct die private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in die County Engineer's Office. 2. A lot is served by a private road when: a. the only road frontage for the lot in the Plat is on the private road, or; b. a lot having frontage on more than one road (public or private) constructs an approach to die private road. 3. The Riverwalk Home Owners Association or its successors in interest shall maintain the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with die approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 4. The owuer(s) of any lot created by the Plat or alteration thereof and served by a private road shall be responsible for maintenance of said private road, including associated drainage facilities, in conformance with approved plans on file with the County Engineer's office. 5. Maintenance financing of the private roads and associated drainage facilities shall be in a manner determined by the Riverwalk Home Owners Association or their successors in interest. 6. Should the Riverwalk Home Owners Association be terminated for any reason, die successors in interest shall be die individual lot owners, or their successors in interest, who are members of die Riverwalk Home Owners Association at die time of said termination. 7. In the event such private road including associated drainage facilities is improved to Spokane County standards for public streets, and die County is willing to accept die dedication of such road and drainage facilities, each lot owner shall execute any conveyance documents necessary to accomplish such dedication. 8. Owners of lots within the Plat who are served by such road may sue and recover damages and attorneys' fees from any owner of any lot within the Plat which is also served who refuses to participate in the road and drainage facilities construction, financing, and maintenance. 9. WARNING; Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, or maintain or otherwise service die private roads, and associated drainage facilities contained within or providing service to the property described in the Plat. By accepting this Plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued for property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that die County has no obligation of any kind of nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road or its' associated drainage facilities. 10. Spokane County is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all private roads and /or drainage easements, for the purpose of inspection and emergency maintenance of drainage swales, and any other drainage facilities, if not properly maintained by the Riverwalk Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect and maintain die drainage easements or drainage swales, nor does the County accept any liability for failure by the Riverwalk Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest to properly maintain such areas. 11. The lot owners within this Plat shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface path of natural or man -made drainage flow over and across their respective properties. 12. The lot owner or his representative shall inform each succeeding purchaser of all drainage easements on the property and of his responsibility for. maintaining surface drainage paths and swales within said easements. 13. The Riverwalk Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest, shall maintain all water quality treatment swales ( "208 swales ") and drainage ditches situated within this Plat, and any portion of a 208 swale situated in the public right -of -way adjacent to this Plat, with a permanent ground cover as specified on the current approved plans on file with the County Engineer's Office. The Riverwalk Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest, may install approved shrubbery and /or trees which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the 208 swales and drainage ditches, as indicated by die current approved plans on file with die County Engineer's Office. 14. Spokane County does not accept die responsibility of maintaining die drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas, nor die responsibility for any damage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties sue to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. 15. Whenever the Riverwalk Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest, fail to maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with die approved drainage plan, a notice of such failure may be given to die Riverwalk Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest, by the County. If not corrected within the period indicated on said notice, the County has the right to correct the maintenance failure, or to have it corrected, at die expense of die Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest. 16. Any building that is constructed on a lot in this Plat shall be set at such an elevation so as to provide positive drainage away from any drainage entry point to die building (including but not limited to a window well, a window unprotected by a window well, or a doorway). Said positive drainage shall consist of a nrhiirnum slope of 3% away from the building for a distance of at least 10 feet from the building. The lots shall be graded so that either a) all runoff is routed away from die building, and conveyed over the lot to a natural drainage Swale or approved drainage facility, or b) drainage intercepted on the lot is disposed of on the lot in an approved drainage facility. The approved drainage facility shall be constructed in accordance with die approved plans on file at the County Engineer's Office. Any revisions to die approved drainage plans must be approved by the County Engineer's Office prior to construction of said revisions. 17. This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road and drainage facilities as provided herein. {INDIVIDUAL OR CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT) {INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT} (signature) (name) (signature) (name) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) County of Spokane ss I certify that I know or that 1 have satisfactory evidence that (and ) is(are ) the person(s) who appeared before me , and said persons acknowledged that he(she)(they) signed this instrument, on oath stated that he(she)(they) was(were) authorized to execute die instrument and acknowledged it as his(her)(tteir) free and voluntary act and deed, for die uses and purposes stated in die instrument. DATED this day of , 199 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at appointment expires . My (CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT) (CORPORATION NAME) A (name of State of Incorporation) (Type of Corporate Entity) {e.g., A Washington Limited Partnership) By: (Title) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) County of Spokane ss I certify that I know or that I have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me , and said person acknowledged that he(she) signed this instrument, on oath stated that he(she) was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the (Title) of (Corporation name) to be the free and voluntary act of such corporation, for the uses and purposes stated in the instrument. DATED this _ day of , 199_ . NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at . My appointment expires .S`/ INV :i bN NN Wcl. N W b4. b,5100 ..i9E...:11 /4 31`3c1. 8 /JJ4 40 RADIAL S 25 28 57.0 W DELTA 34 31 20 RT RADIUS 30.-000 TAN 9.3216 L -ARC 18.0758 RADIAL S 60 00 17.0 W RP 3423.39324 3205.78040 41 40 CHORD N 47 15 23.0 W 17.8036 3408.39538 3179.79840 42 TAN @PT N 29 59 43.0 W 42 INV N 29 59 43.0 W 71.0200 3469.90343 3144.29347 43 RADIAL S 60 00 17.0 W DELTA 90 00 00.0 RT RADIUS 30.0000 TAN 30.0000 L -ARC 47.1239 RADIAL N 29 59 43.0 W RP 3484.90129 3170.27547 44 43 CHORD N 15 00 17.0 E 42.4264 3510.88329 3155.27761 45 TAN@PT N 60 00 17.0 E 45 INV N 60 00 17.0 E 45.9200 3533.84001 3195.04739 46 RADIAL S 29 59 43.0 E DELTA 69 04 58.0 LT RADIUS 185.0000 TAN 127.3438 L -ARC 223.0586 RADIAL N 80 55 19.0 E RP 3694.06234 3102.56059 47 46 CHORD N 25 27 48.0 E 209.7905 373.25161 3285.24334 48 TAN @PT N 9 04 41.0 W 48 INV N 9 04 41.0 W 50.1400 3772.76357 3277.33226 49 LAT & DEP 0.00139 0.00488 49 HCLOSE N 74 06 22.0 E 0.0051 3772.76496 3277.33713 12 PREC = 1 TO 203036 Area = 43905.57 sq ft 1.00793 ac FROM BLOCK 1 SIDELINES AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 4 INV 27 INV RADIAL DELTA .RADIUS TAN L -ARC RADIAL RP 28 CHORD TAN @PT 30 INV RADIAL DELTA RADIUS TAN L -ARC RADIAL RP 31 CHORD TAN @PT 33 INV 34 FROM BLOCK 3,4,TRACT C SIDELINES AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 6 INV N 29 59 43.0 W 7 INV N 60 00 17.0 E 8 INV N 4 05 24.0 E 9 INV N 9 04 41.0 W 10 INV N 80 55 19.0 E 11 INV S 9 04 41.0 E 35 37 PREC = 1 TO 51727 No Area ANGLE RADIAL DELTA RADIUS TAN L -ARC RADIAL RP CHORD TAN @PT INV N 29 59 43.0 W N 60 00 17.0 E N 29 59 43.0 W 90 00 00.0 RT 30. 0000 30. 0000 47.1239 N 60 00 17.0 E S 74 59 43.0 E S 29 59 43.0 E S 29 59 43.0 E N 60 00 17.0 E 34 30 50.0 RT 30.0000 9.3192 18.0714 S 85 28 53.0 E S 12 44 18.0 E S 4 31 07.0 W S 60 00 02.0 W N 80 55 19.0 E 69 04 58.0 RT 150. 0000 103.2518 180.8583 S 29 59 43.0 E S 25 27 48.0 W S 60 00 17.0 W S 60 00 17.0 W BLOCK 2 & TRACT B SIDELINES AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 12 INV N 80 55 19.0 E 13 INV S 9 04 41 E 14 INV S 18 08 02.wn W 15 INV S 40 30 15.0 W DIST NORTH 118.0300 45. 3200 42.4264 71. 0300 17.7994 170.1004 100.0000 117.8200 141.7800 130.0500 3331.00966 3433.23151 3455. 88827 3429.90627 3444.90413 3383.38742 3368. 38956 3366.02607 70. 0400 3331. 00666 LAT & DEP 0.00300 - 0.00135 HCLOSE N 24 10 14.6 W 0.0033 3331.00966 3079.77102 PREC = 1 TO 112336 Area = 8668.14 sq ft 0.19899 ac ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST 3476.16204 3025.12647 110.0000 3571.42936 2970.13432 194.9800 3668.90545 3138.99999 35.0400 3703.85621 3141.49916 49.1400 3752.38070 3133.74585 110.0000 3769.73648 3242.36803 52.6700 3717.72621 3250.67829 3694.05923 3564.14924 175.9900 3476.16680 LAT & DEP - 0.00476 - 0.00091 38 HCLOSE S 10 49 35.7 W 0.0048 3476.16204 3025.12647 PREC = 1 TO 187397 Area = 37739.22 sq ft 0.86637 ac FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST 3772. 76496 3788.54295 3672. 373 3537.+0068 34:.8. 57603 EAST 1 TO 3079.77102 3020.76445 3060.01459 3075.01 3100.99444 3136.50437 3110. 52238 3140.42913 3079.77237 3102. 55715 3177.54644 3025.12738 3277.33713 3376.08456 3394.67419 3350.54678 3266.07887 4 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 4 TO 6 7 8 9 1.0 11 35 36 37 38 6 TO 12 13 14 15 39 FROM P1414B RIVERWALK 3RD ADD / 0°/G~ .9s AUTO INVERSE ***** START 1 INV S 40 30 15.0 W 2 • INV S 60 00 02"0 W 4 INV N 29 59 43^0 W 5 INV N 60 00 17"0 E 6 INV N 39 59 43^0 W 7 INV N 60 00 17.0 E 8 INV N 4 05 24.0 E 9 INV N 9 04 41.0 W 10 INV N 80 55 19"0 E 11 INV N 85 03 01.0 E 12 INV N 80 55 19.0 E 13 INV S 9 04 41.0 E 14 INV S 18 08 02.0 W 15 FROM CENTERLINE SALMON RIVER LANE THENCE SOUTH WEST AUTO INVERSE ***** START 4 INV S 60 00 02.0 W 33.9900 3 INV S 29 59 58.0 E 43.0000 16 INV N 60 00 02.0 E 134,3100 17 INV N 29 59 43"0 W 43.0000 18 INV N 29 59 43,0 W 135.5200 19 INV S 60 00 17.0 W 100.3200 20 INV N 29 59 43.0 W 17.5000 LAT & DEP 21 HCLOSE N 79 08 17.4 W 0.0041 PREC = 1 TO 122794 No Area FROM ANGLE DIST ***** START FROM ANGLE ANGLE DIST DIST CENTERLINE PRIVATE ROAD NORTH EAST OF SAV\LMON RIVER LANE AUTO INVERSE ***** START 19 INV N 60 00 17.0 E 100.9200 RADIAL S 29 59 43.0 E DELTA 69 04 58.0 LT RADIUS 167^5000 TAN 115.2978 L-ARC 201"9584 RADIAL N 80 55 19.0 E RP 22 CHORD N 25 27 48.0 E 189.9455 TAN@PT N 9 04 41.0 W 24 INV N 9 04 41.0 W 51.4100 25 INV N 85 03 01^0 E 17.5500 LAT & DEP 26 HCLOSE S 72 37 25.4 W 0^0072 NORTH 3694"05869 3720,48681 3771.25287 3772"76711 ~@.00215 3772.76496 EAST 3537"45751 3350^54802 1 130,0500 3438.57286 3266^08011 2 215.1300 3331.00966 3079.77102 4 153.0300 3463.54384 3003.26695 5 25"2400 3476"16204 3025.12647 6 110.0000 3571"42936 2970"13432 7 194"9800 3668"90545 3138"99999 8 35,0400 3703.85621 3141"49916 9 49"1400 3752.38070 3133.74585 10 110"0000 3769.73648 3242.36803 11 35"1000 3772^76496 3277"33713 12 100.0000 3788"54295 3376.08456 13 117.8200 3672"19873 3394.67419 14 141.7800 3537.46068 3350.54678 15 LAT & DEP -0.00317 0.00124 HCLOSE S 21 19 31.7 E 0.0034 3537.45751 3350.54802 PREC = 1 TO 416185 Area = 112569.91 sq ft 2"58425 ac ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST 3331.00966 3079.77102 3314^01495 3050.33466 3276^77565 3071.83429 3343^92952 3188.15082 3381.17039 3166^65389 3498.53973 3098"90356 3448.38689 3012"01976 3463.54306 3003"27101 0"00078 -0,00406 3463,54384 3003"26695 NORTH EAST 3498.53973 3098.90356 NORTH EAST 3498.53973 3098,90356 3548,99253 3186"30700 3102.56896 3267"97091 3259.85944 3277"34399 `@,N0686 3277^33713 TO 1 TO 4 3 16 17 18 19 20 21 5 TO 19 TO 19 22 23 24 25 26 12 In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of (hereinafter referred to as the "Plat "), the undersigned covenants and agrees that: DECLARATION OF COVENANT 1. The subdivider /sponsor will construct the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 2. A lot is served by a private road when: a. the only road frontage for the lot in the Plat is on the private road, or; b. a lot having frontage on more than one road (public or private) constructs an approach to the private road. 3. The Home Owners Association or its successors in interest shall maintain the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 4. The owner(s) of any lot created by the Plat or alteration thereof and served by a private road shall be responsible for maintenance of said private road, including associated drainage facilities, in conformance with approved plans on file with the County Engineer's office. 5. Maintenance financing of the private roads and associated drainage facilities shall be in a manner determined by the Home Owners Association or their successors in interest. 6. Should the Home Owners Association be terminated for any reason, the successors in interest shall be the individual lot owners, or their successors in interest, who are members of the Home Owners Association at the time of said termination. 7. In the event such private road including associated drainage facilities is improved to Spokane County standards for public streets, and the County is willing to accept the dedication of such road and drainage facilities, each lot owner shall execute any conveyance documents necessary to accomplish such dedication. 8. Owners of lots within the Plat who are served by such road may sue and recover damages and attorneys' fees from any owner of any lot within the Plat which is also served who refuses to participate in the road and drainage facilities construction, financing, and maintenance. 9. WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, or maintain or otherwise service the private roads, and associated drainage facilities contained within or providing service to the property described in the Plat. By accepting this Plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued for property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind of nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road or its' associated drainage facilities. 10. Spokane County is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all private roads and/or drainage easements, for the purpose of inspection and emergency maintenance of drainage swales, and any other drainage facilities, if not properly maintained by the Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect and maintain the drainage easements or drainage swales, nor does the County accept any liability for failure by the Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest to properly maintain such areas. 11. The lot owners within this Plat shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface path of natural or man -made drainage flow over and across their respective properties. 12. The lot owner or his representative shall inform each succeeding purchaser of all drainage easements on the property and of his responsibility for maintaining surface drainage paths and swales within said easements. 13. The Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest, shall maintain all water quality treatment swales ( "208 swales ") and drainage ditches situated within this Plat, and any portion of a 208 swale situated in the public right -of -way adjacent to this Plat, with a permanent ground cover as specified on the current approved plans on file with the County Engineer's Office. The Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest, may install approved shrubbery and/or trees which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the 208 swales and drainage ditches, as indicated by the current approved plans on file with the County Engineer's Office. 14. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas, nor the responsibility for any damage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties sue to deficient construction and/or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. 15. Whenever the Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest, fail to maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved drainage plan, a notice of such failure may be given to the Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest, by the County. If not corrected within the period indicated on said notice, the County has the right to correct the maintenance failure, or to have it corrected, at the expense of the Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest. 16. Any building that is constructed on a lot in this Plat shall be set at such an elevation so as to provide positive drainage away from any drainage entry point to the building (including but not limited to a window well, a window unprotected by a window well, or a doorway). Said positive drainage shall consist of a minimum slope of 3% away from the building for a distance of at least 10 feet from the building. The lots shall be graded so that either a) all runoff is routed away from the building, and conveyed over the lot to a natural drainage swale or approved drainage facility, or b) drainage intercepted on the lot is disposed of on the lot in an approved drainage facility. The approved drainage facility shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file at the County Engineer's Office. Any revisions to the approved drainage plans must be approved by the County Engineer's Office prior to construction of said revisions. 17. This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road and drainage facilities as provided herein. {INDIVIDUAL OR CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT{ {INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT) 2 October 16, 1995 To: From: Development Engineering Services OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Spokane County, Washington RE: Language for P.U.D. Plat Dedication & Covenants Project # The private roads and/or common areas shown on this plat are hereby dedicated to the (Home Owners Association) created by document recorded under (date) Auditor's document number The private roads, as shown hereon, are easements which provide a means of ingress and egress for those lots within the Plat having frontage thereon. The private roads and /or common areas cannot be sold or transferred, regardless of any provisions in the covenants to the contrary, without express approval by Spokane County, and shall be considered subservient estates for tax purposes to the other lots created herein. Drainage easements, as platted and shown hereon, which are for the purpose of installing, operating, and maintaining drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted to the �f Pp (HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION) or its successors in interest. oN ?f This Plat is subject to the separate DECLARATION OF COVENANT as recorded under (date) Auditor's Document No. which by reference is made a part hereof. {WARNING: The draft covenant must be approved by the County Engineer's Office PRIOR to recording the covenant!} DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer May 27, 1999 Ms. JoAnne Tonani Sedwick James of Washington, Inc. P.O. Box 2151 Spokane, WA 99210 -2151 RE: Release of Bond #341266 - The Hartford Insurance Group Riverwalk 2 & 3rd Additions - P -1414A & P -1414B Dear JoAnne: We received the maintenance /warranty bond for the above project on May 26, 1999 in the required amount of $ 2,123.00. You are hereby authorized to release bond number 341266 in full, from the Hartford Insurance Group, effective immediately. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, - 7 Bill Hemmings, PE Development Services Engineer /Manager cc: File, KC Construction A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 477 - 3600 FAX: (509) 324 - 3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer May 7, 1999 Mr. Mike Klika KC Construction Company P.O. Box 1455 Hayden Lake, Idaho 83837 -1455 Dear Mike: A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RE: Bond Release for Riverwalk t & 3 Addition and Warranty Bond - P -1414A & P -1414B Spokane County accepted Indiana Avenue for maintenance and inclusion in its road system as a public road on April 20, 1999. We need to release your performance bond number 341266 from Hartford Insurance Group that is currently in force on this project and replace it with a Warranty Bond. The Warranty Bond should run from April 20, 1999 for a one year period in the amount of $ 2,123.00. I am enclosing a copy of a bond form we have accepted for a warranty bond. As soon as we receive the warranty bond, I will fax Hartford Insurance group with a bond release authorization. If you have any questions, please contact me at 509- 456 -3600. Thanks Sincerely, Bill Hemmings, PE Development Services Engineer /Manager cc: Bond File 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 477 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 2) A bond issued by Hartford Insurance Group October 2,1996 Is for both plats. $39,726.14 For Riverwalk 2ND $2,743.00 For Riverwalk 3RD TO: JIM RADKE FROM: DAVE RERTO DATE: October 3, 1996 SUBJECT: BOND P1414A & P1414C RIVERWALK 2ND & 3RD The bond for the above mentioned projects is for the following items: 1) All the items on the approved road and drainage plans with the exception of the sod for the "209" Swales. c: \wpdoc \lave \memo \items OFFICE OF Taft: COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COVNTY, WASHINGTON DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Seafrrt 10500 N.E. Eighth Scr--.t Suite 400 s e ll V.1,=, 'JA. 93110:I Attn: Douala E. eirmtt Dear Sir: • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director RE: River 2nd a 3rd Addft.-on's P D1414S Stanton-Spokane L.E. r 3, icfge".: Plai. he 7.. that the Set Aide Fund No. S467777703-2€ hv your company Euretv for installations of roads and associated drainage Facilities for the above mentioned plats, dated June 7, 19i rua. amount of c42,4 may now be if you have any 7 4U 7 :!3ti , :flE, fee free to ,Thur mrfice y e, I.- ‘• • Tr', *no, 7,i 1 1 So 1771 17 rf nr David 5erto Compilcnct 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 • (509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 I., f 1. ,JoAnne Tonani Bond Department Encl. 7 l, ©1 Sedgwick Sedgwick James of Washington, Inc. 601 West Main, Suite 1400. PO Box 2151. Spokane, Washington 99210 -2151 Telephone 509 358 -3900, Facsimile 509 358 -3937 RECEIVED OCT 1 5 19 SPOKANE COUNry ENGINEER October 14, 1996 Ed Parry pr Dave Bertow • Spokane Cbunty Public-Works Engineering/Road 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Re: K. C. Construction, Inc. Subdivision Bond for Riverwalk`2nd & 3rd Additions Gentlemen: Enclosed please find in duplicate a rider we have issued changing the bond number for the subdivision bond we issued for K. C. Construction, Inc. Please sign the duplicate copy of this rider and return it in the enclosed self addressed stamped envelope. The original is for your file. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Thank you. Sincerely, p ii ni cn nmklnn Risk Services ri.rployre nn ielits BY as Principal, and The Hartford Insurance Group Hartford Plaza Hartford, Connecticut 06115 in favor of SPOKANE COUNTY RIDER To be attached to and form part of Bond Number5094288 executed by K. C. CONSTRUCTION, INC. and dated OCTOBER 7 , 19 96. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY as Surety, In consideration of the premium charged for the attached bond, it is hereby agreed that: THE BOND NUMBER BE CHANGED FROM: 5094288 The attached bond shall be subject to all its agreements, limitations and conditions except as herein expressly modified. This rider shall become effective as of the 7TH day of OCTOBER 1996. Signed, sealed and dated this 14TH day of OCTOBER 1996. THIS RIDER ACCEPTED ON SPOKANE COUNTY, WA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING /ROADS DIVISION TO: 341266 AC; a U , 191G, HAR'nuRD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY Attorney -in -Fact JOANNE TONANI KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS that K.C. CONSTRUCTION, INC. (developer), as "Principal," and a FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY (bonding company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut and authorized to transact a surety business in the State of Washington, as "Surety," are held and firmly bound unto Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, as "Obligee," in the penal sum of FORTY —TWO THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED SIXTY —NINE AND 14/00- - Dollars (S 42,469.14 lawful money of the United State of American, for the payment of which the Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, said Principal is the developer of a tract of land in Spokane County known as RIVERWALK SUBDIVISION, 2ND AND 3RD ADDITIONS and being located in Section 08 Township 25 North, Range 45 E.W.M., in Spokane County, Washington, and said County has required that a bond be furnished in an amount sufficient to pay the construction cost of installing to the approved grades, curbs, sidewalks, drainage control and/or paving of roadways adjacent to said development, and such other work as in incidental and necessary thereto, all in accordance with Spokane County Road Department specifications, and to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Engineer; such improvements to be completed two (2) years or less time unless said time period be extended at the option of the Spokane County Engineer. Upon failure of Principal to comply with the requirements stated herein within the time authorized, and upon delivery of written notice thereof by Obligee to Surety, the Surety shall make satisfaction to Obligee to the extent of this Bond. 46 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT BOND N,VVo,d"q.imp Bond No. 5094288 The obligation of this Bond shall be kept in full force and effect until, in the opinion of the Obligee, the requirements herein stated have been satisfied, in which event written release will be given by the Obligee, the Obligee having sole right to grant such release. Surety hereby waives all rights to release from the obligation except as herein stated. SIGNED AND SEALED this 7th day of October 19 96 K.C. Construction, Inc. Principal BY: P ?�'�� Hartford Fire Insurance Company Sure BY: �1 Lois Stewart, Attorney - in — Fact (Title) c: \wpdoc \dave \memo \items TO: JIM RADER PROM: DAVE SEATO -1 DATE: June 21, 1996 • SUBJECT: BOND ITEMS 81414E RIVERWALK 3RD ADD OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPORANZ COUNTY, WASHINGTON The bond for the above :mentioned project is for the following items: 1) All the items on the approved road and drainage plans. (1)s/Rsr Douglas B. Sollitt Vice President Builder Banking June 7, 1996 Mr. Bill Johns Spokane County Engineer 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 Ref: Developer /Borrower: Stanton - Spokane, L.P. Our Loan No.: 8467777703 -26 Funds in the amount of $2,743.00 are being set -aside in a construction loan in the name of Stanton- Spokane, L.P. (developer /borrower), et ux, in lieu of a bond, for the purpose of assuring completion and installation of storm drainage in Riverwalk 3rd Addition (development) in accordance with the drawings and specifications as submitted to and approved by the County of Spokane Engineer's Office on October 31, 1995. No funds will be disbursed from this set -aside without the prior written authorization of the Spokane County Engineer. This set aside of funds will not be revoked without the consent of the County Engineer. In the event that the completion and acceptance of the above -named improvements for maintenance by the County of Spokane are not accomplished within a period of one year from the date of this agreement. All funds remaining in the set -aside will be forfeited to the County of Spokane upon written request by the Spokane County Engineer's Office to BANK OF AMERICA NW, N.A., doing business as SEAFIRST BANK, successor by name change to SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association. It is understood and agreed that upon the forfeiture of the funds to the County of Spokane, that the County of Spokane will then undertake completion of the subdivision to be accomplished within twelve (12) months from the date of the forfeiture of funds. It is further understood and agreed that in the event of any shortage of funds to complete improvements, the County of Spokane may have recourse against Stanton - Spokane, L.P. (developer /borrower) named above. Seafirst Bank shall be under no liability for non - completion of the work, its obligations being expressly limited to holding and disbursing the set -aside funds as agreed in the agreement. It is specifically understood and agreed by the parties, that in holding funds for this development BANK OF AMERICA NW, N.A., doing business as SEAFIRST BANK, successor by name change to SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association is not serving as guarantor for any additional costs incurred by the County of Spokane in the completion and acceptance of the above -named improvements. Seafirst Bank Builder Banking /Real Estate Center /10500 N.E. Eighth Street, Suite 400 /Bellevue, Washington 98004 Telephone (206) 585 -6462 FAX (206) 585 -6475 SEAFIRST 6 7 ACCEPTED AND APPROVED this 7th day of June, 1996. STANTON - SPOKANE L P., a Washington limited partnership By: DEAN - HOUSLEY, L.LC. a Washington limited liability company General Partner SEAFIRST BANK By: By: Its: By: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION a Washington corporation Member Brian Housley Member Vice President By: P. Edward Dean, President Douglas Sollitt OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1ST BOND REDUCTION PROJECT P14148 RNERWALK 3RD ADD NAME DAVE BERTO DATE 05- Jun-96 DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANITY PRICE COST 1) Drywall - Type A EA 1250.00 0.00 2) Drywell - Type B ® 25% EA 0.5 1560.00 780.00 3) Grate - Type 1 EA 315.00 0.00 4) Grate Type 2 EA 340.00 0.00 5) Grate - Type 4 0 25% EA 0.5 300.00 150.00 6) Backfiil For DW 025% CY 20 16.00 320.00 7) Concrete Inlet 0 25% EA 0.25 750.00 187.50 8) C.M. pipe 10" DIa. LF 27.00 0.00 G 1 LF 3.5 27.00 94.50 10) C.M. Pipe 15" DIa. LF 27.80 0.00 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. LF 31.50 0.00 12) Precast Manhole EA 1500.00 0.00 13) Solid lid EA 310.00 0.00 14) Ditch/208 Excavation 0 100% CY 42 10.00 420.00 15) Sod 0 100% SF 1130 0.70 791.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 5) 0.00 6) 0.00 16) Monuments 17) Barricade 18) Street Signs 1) 2) 3) 4) GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade 20) Top Course 21) Base Course 22) Asphalt Concrete 23) Curb Type A 24) Curb Type B 25) Curb Type R 26) Sidewalk NON -STANDARD ROAD ITEMS DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 2743.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL CY CY CY Tons IF LF LF SQ YD EA 185.00 LF 33.00 EA 85.00 GRADING AND SURFACING 10.00 16.00 16.00 44.40 7.00 8.00 8.00 16.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 USE 32,800.00 GRAND TOTAL (2,743.00) �, BOND ESTIMATE PROJECT Riverwalk 3rd 14148 DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST 1) Drywell - Type A EA 1250.00 0.00 2) Drywell - Type B EA 2 1560.00 3120.00 $a 3) Grate - Type 1 EA 315.00 0.00 4) Grate Type 2 EA 340.00 0.00 5) Grate - Type 4 EA 2 300.00 600.00 2-o 6) Backfill For DW CY 80 16.00 1280.00 2.5 7) Concrete Inlet EA 1 750.00 750.00 Za 8) C.M. Pipe 10" Dia. LF 23.00 0.00 9) C.M. Pipe 17' Dia. LF 14 27.00 378.00 2 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. LF 27.80 0.00 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. LF 31.50 0.00 12) Precast Manhole EA 1500.00 0.00 13) Solid lid EA 310.00 0.00 14) Pond Excavation CY 42 10.00 420.00 / 15) Sod SF 1130 0.70 791.00 7120 - NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Wilbert Vault Curb Inlet EA 250.00 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 5) 0.00 6) 0.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK NON -STANDARD ROAD ITEMS NAME pl DATE 05-Jun-96 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 7339.00 16) Monuments. EA 185.00 0.00 17) Barricade LF 33.00 0.00 18) Street Signs EA 85.00 0.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL 0.00 19) Rough Grade CY 10.00 0.00 20) Top Course CY 16.00 0.00 21) Base Course CY 16.00 0.00 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 44.40 0.00 23) Curb Type A LF 7.00 0.00 24) Curb Type B LF 8.00 0.00 25) Curb Type R LF 8.00 0.00 26) Sidewalk SQ YD 16.70 0.00 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING 0.00 GRAND TOTAL (7,339.00 PROJECT Riverwalk 3rd 1414B BOND ESTIMATE NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK NON - STANDARD ROAD ITEMS NAME pl DATE 05Jun -96 DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST 1) Drywell - Type A EA 1250.00 0.00 2) Drywell - Type B EA 2 1560.00 3120.00 3) Grate - Type 1 EA 315.00 0.00 4) Grate Type 2 EA 340.00 0.00 5) Grate - Type 4 EA 2 300.00 600.00 6) Backfill For DW CY 80 16.00 1280.00 7) Concrete Inlet EA 1 750.00 750.00 8) C.M. Pipe 10" Dia. LF 23.00 0.00 9) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. LF 14 27.00 378.00 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. LF 27.80 0.00 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. LF 31.50 0.00 12) Precast Manhole EA 1500.00 0.00 13) Solid lid EA 310.00 0.00 14) Pond Excavation CY 42 10.00 420.00 15) Sod SF 1130 0.70 791.00 1) Wilbert Vault Curb Inlet EA 250.00 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 5) 0.00 6) ' 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 7339.00 16) Monuments EA 185.00 0.00 17) Barricade LF 33.00 0.00 18) Street Signs EA 85.00 0.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL 0.00 19) Rough Grade CY 10.00 0.00 20) Top Course CY 16.00 0.00 21) Base Course CY 16.00 0.00 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 44.40 0.00 23) Curb Type A LF 7.00 0.00 24) Curb Type B LF 8.00 0.00 25) Curb Type R LF 8.00 0.00 26) Sidewalk SQ YD 16.70 0.00 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 ,1 4) 0.00 Gi GRADING AND SURFACING 0.00 t•? 7, GRAND TOTAL 7,339.00 Prepared for: TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY NORTH 720 ARGONNE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99212 DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION 16720 N.E. 116TH STREET REDMOND, WA 98052 cc: Inland Pacific Engineering SEVENTH REPORT P L A T C E R T I F I C A T E Effective Date: May 31, 1996 at 8:00 a.m. Certificate for filing Plat of: RIVERWALK THIRD ADDITION Order No.: CD196507 In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for approval, this company has examined the records of Spokane County Auditor's and Clerk's offices, and the records of the Clerk of the United States District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount, if any, paid for this certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to -wit: That portion of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter and Government Lots 5 and 6 of Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 45 E.W.M., more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most Northerly corner of Tract "H" of RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 23 of Plats, Pages 37 through 40; thence North 60 °00'02" East, a distance of 33.99 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 29 °59'43" West, a distance of 153.03 feet; thence North 60 °00'17" East, a distance of 25.24 feet; thence North 29 °59'43" West, .a distance of 110.00 feet; thence North 60 °00'17" East, a distance of 194.98 feet; thence North 04 °05'24" East, a distance of 35.04 feet; thence North 09 °04'41" West, a distance of 49.14 feet; thence North 80 °55'19" East, a distance of 110.00 feet; thence North 85 °03'01" East, a distance of 35.10 feet; thence North 80 °55'19" East, a distance of 100.00 feet; thence South 09 °04'41" East, a distance of 117.82 feet; thence South 18 °08'02" West, a distance of 141.78 feet; thence South 40°30'15" West, a distance of 130.05 feet; thence South 60 °00'02" West, a distance of 215.13 feet to the Point of Beginning; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington VESTED IN: XCEPTIONS: BETWEEN: AND: TON- SPOKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership. 1. Taxes and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as to Parcel No. 55083.9052. Parcel numbers are provided from the latest Assessor's Maps available to the company. Said parcel numbers are not a matter of the public record therefor, the company makes no assurance as to validity or accuracy relating thereto. 2. Liability to future charges by Spokane County for Storm Water service. 3. Liability to future assessments by Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19 4. Declaration of recorded on May 5. DECLARATION OF THEREOF: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: Covenants and Restrictions imposed by instrument 20, 1994, under Recording No. 9405200420. COVENANT AND EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS This Declaration of Covenant & Easement ( "Easement ") shall terminate automatically, with respect to any portion of the easement area dedicated to the public, at the time of such dedication. 6. VOLUNTARY MITIGATION AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: July 24, 1995 RECORDING NO.: 9507240089 FOR MITIGATING SCHOOL IMPACT, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO LIABILITY FOR SAID MITIGATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $750.00 FOR EACH NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNIT. Page 2 of 4 Stanton Development Company, a Washington General Partnership, on its own behalf and as nominee for Stanton - Spokane L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership Wel Co Group, Inc., a Washington Corporation, their heirs, successors and assigns Ingress and egress and utilities Portion of Govt. Lots 5 and 6 in Sec. 8, Twn. 25 N., R. 45 EWM May 15, 1995 9505150112 • • 7. Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for River Walk imposed by instrument recorded on July 25, 1995, under Recording No. 9507250312, including, but not limited to, liability for assessments levied by the community association, and rights or benefits which may be disclosed affecting land outside the boundary described in Schedule A. 8. TEMPORARY TURNAROUND AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: This Easement platted. 9. Covenants, conditions and restrictions imposed by instrument recorded on January 3, 1996, under Recording No. 9601030055, including but not limited to rights or benefits which may be disclosed affecting land outside the boundary described in Schedule A. 10. Covenants, conditions and restrictions imposed by instrument recorded on April 2, 1996, under Recording No. 9604020267, including but not limited to rights or benefits which may be disclosed affecting land outside the boundary described in Schedule A. 11. DEED OF TRUST, SECURITY AGREEMENT AND FIXTURE FILING WITH ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: AREA AFFECTS:. will terminate at such time S Page 3 of 4 Order No. CD196507 Spokane County Allowing natural drainage and /or runoff Portion of SW1 /4 of Sec. 8, Twn. 25 N., R. 45 EWM July 28, 1995 9507280291 the described areas are Stanton - Spokane L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership Rainie it Company le -First National Bank, Banking Associat' ,000.00 September 29, 1995 March 29, 1996 9603290131 Affects this and other property onal Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owed by contacting the appropriate lender /agency /individual. SAID DEED OF TRUST IS A RE- RECORD OF THE DEED OF TRUST RECORDED ON OCTOBER 10, 1995, UNDER RECORDING NO. 9510100081. 12. Potential liability for assessments levied by Spokane County Utility Department for the Aquifer Protection Area. To verify, call 458 -2538. In order to make payment, account number is necessary. Sc Page 4 of 4 Order No. CD196507 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BY For service on this order call: (509) 922 -2222 (FAX) 926 -1519 Connie Dodge, Title Officer ® • 'TRANSAMERICA TITL- This , is °radicle& jitht ;I.cjO. It is r !nfe-Idoii to ..1(1 ' rOtS i ro hd ol-e,:erty.incitiding, but 11.1.i rO, areu. dirle:117...:115, easements, ,:r.:..tiacnmen:c.., banner, of ,-,ounderie.s.:t. is not parr 'of, not Ices • it moult?. the con.rnitmont or pulley to which it is enabled. The Compony a.:;sparrs NO utzturr ior ..;ny matter related w this skelCt Reference snoutd be made to an accurate survey f of f urther tillOral-atiOn • N., ti ref 1E5 37 5 303 C x A 7596 S.F. UNPLATTED - N04"05'24'E 35.04' TRACT C 3300 SI N 60 tr O N6000 ° o_ 25.24' \ 1 E J UNPLATTED - �o 0 b N6503•01' E 110.0 35.1 z 1460 E 100 AN: N80'5619 E too ar 1 2 6 8 6202 S F. ' C10 715as519 E 1 1 96ao0'02-E 56v 3399' —y // 1 / /a/a \ � 1 0 \W_ \ \ ---,--c '' / t.:ei\ i .-- \\ \ i� - 1 . /� : 1 \ ._ .-- . DEDICATION J th91 2 .nr.Ja 4 _' air ati an. O ? 1_u S. m6 sr. G 30. 0 4 leer ypb h:i. h:'a l' KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS. that STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. a wa.Mgton general pertnennp. 1NRYI5T CAPITAL CORPORATION. a Sint Coarado Corawatbn and NIB SAYINGS Oa I.ws caused to be platted into ton. Becks. Common Nees and Street the tend Mgan hewn. to be known as RM1£FWALX. IIMO AOBRON being a pertn S ane As the Souu.eeet Ourtr and Gwrmn.nt Leta 5 and 6. of Section 6. T.25 N.. R.45 E. W.M., In Spo one County. wmIkgtdn descrbed as labn: B.qAMn9 at the meet northerly <rmr et Tract N' of RMR*NX FIRST AOBRON =corny to the plat r egarded under Beek 23 of Rots. Pages 37 thought b: Bence N.W00'OZw. a Prance el 33.99 feel to the TRUE POINT 01 T1 BEGBNC: thence INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -6844 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ATTENTION: Dave Berto PROJECT #: PE -1414 Description: • Xerox Prints ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ ❑ Original Drawing - ❑ Contract Documents ❑ • Title Report • Declaration of Coy. ❑ No. Copies Description #: 95618". PROJECT NAME: RIVERWALK 3RD. ADDITION( DATE: December 29. 1995 LP.�E.C. PROJECT 1 Original Signed and Notarized Declaration of Covenants 2 Revised Final Plat 1 Up -dated Plat Certificate 1 Original Signed and Notarized Sewer and Access Easement Purpose • Information ❑ Review & Comments ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Written, Approval p Signature & Return . • File Remarks Dave - Enclosed please find the original Declaration of Covenants which need to be filed. Also enclosed if the Sewer and Access Easement the Utility Department required. When you have the Auditor's Document Number please advise and I will put said number on the mylar. Also Enclosed is an up -dated Plat Certificate with title holder changes. Also enclosed is the revised Final Plat per your requested changes. If you have any additional comments, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Thank you. Signed: RECEMED DEC 2 91995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL TO: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ATTENTION: Dave Berto PROJECT #: PE -1414 Description: 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 • Xerox Prints ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ ❑ Original Drawing ❑ Contract Documents ❑ ❑ Report ❑ Declaration of Coy. ❑ No. Copies Description 2 Proposed final Plat 1 Check Prints 1 Up -dated Plat Certificate Purpose ❑ Information • Review & Comments ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Written Approval ❑ Signature & Return ❑ Remarks Dave - Enclosed please find two copies of the proposed final plat on the above referenced final plat. I have ordered an updated on the Plat Certificate to correct the distance in the legal. I am securing the easements that are referenced on the face of the plat. If you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Signed: I.PE.C. PROJECT #: 956178 •PROJECT NAME RIVERWALK 3RD ............ ............................... ......................... ............................... ADDITION DATE:. December 6, 1995 RECEPVE DEC 0 7 1995 SPOKAi4E COUNTY ENGINEER INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ATTENTION: Ed Perry PROJECT #: PE -1414B Description: ❑ Xerox Prints ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ ❑ Original Drawing ❑ Contract Documents ❑ ❑ Report • Declaration of Coy. ❑ No. Copies Description 1 Proposed Declaration of Covenant Purpose Remarks Signed: PROJECT NAME: RIVERWALK 3RD ..................... ............................... ADDITION DATE December 5 1995 ....................... I.P�E.C. PROJECT #: 95618 ................... ............................... ❑ Information • Review & Comments ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Written Approval ❑ Signature & Return ❑ Ed - Enclosed please find a copy of the proposed Declaration of Covenants for the above referenced final plat. Please advise if this meets with your approval. Thank you. RECIATET DEC 0 6 1995 SPOIVAT C.:0UNiY LMilNEER ` ter DECLARATION OF COVENANT In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of P1414B, RIVERWALK P.U.D, 3RD ADDITION (hereinafter referred to as the " Plat "), the undersigned covenants and agrees that: 1. The subdivider /sponsor will construct the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 2. A lot is served by the private road when: (a) the only road frontage for the lot in the Development is on the private road; or (b) a lot having frontage on more than one road (public or private) constructs an approach to the private road. 3. THE RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or its successors in interest shall maintain the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 4. The owner(s) of any lot created by the Plat or alteration thereof and served by a private road shall be responsible for maintenance of said private road, including associated drainage facilities, in conromance with approved plans on file with the County Engineer's Office. 5. Maintenance financing of the private roads and associated drainage facilities shall be in a manner determined by RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or their successors in interest. 6. Should RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION be terminated for any reasons, the successors in interest shall be the individual lot owners, or their successors in interest, who are members of RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION at the time of said termination. 7. In the event such private road including associated drainage facilities is improved to Spokane County standards for public streets, and the County is willing to accept the dedication of such road and drainage facilities, each lot owner shall execute any documents necessary to accomplish such dedication. 8. Owners of lots within the Plat who are served by such road, may sue and recover damages and attorneys' fees from any owner of any lot within the Plat which is similarly served who refuses to participate in the road and drainage facilities construction, financing, and maintenance. 9. WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, or maintain or otherwise service the private roads and associated drainage facilities contained within or providing service to the property described in this Plat. By accepting this Plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued for property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road or its associated drainage facilities. 10. Spokane County is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all private roads and /or drainage easement, for the purpose of inspection and emergency maintenance of drainage swales, and any other drainage facilities, if not property maintained by the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, or their successors in interest. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect and maintain the drainage easements or drainage swales, nor does the County accept any liability for failure by the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, or their successors in interest to properly maintain such areas. 11. The lot owners within this Plat shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface path of natural or man -made drainage flow over and across their respective properties. 12. The lot owner or his representative shall inform each succeeding purchaser of all drainage easement on the property and of his responsibility for maintaining surface drainage paths and swales within said easements. 1 13. The RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, or their successors in interest, shall maintain all water quality treatment swales (708" swales") and drainage ditches situated within this Plat, and any portion of a 208 Swale situated in the public right -of -way adjacent to this Plat, with a permanent ground cover as specified on the current approval plans on file with the County Engineer's Office. The RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, or their successors in interest, may install approved shrubbery and /or trees which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the 208 swales and drainage ditches, as indicated by, the current approved plans on file with the County Engineer's Office. 14. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas, nor the responsibility for any drainage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. 15. Whenever the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or their successors in interest fail to maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved drainage plan, a notice of such failure may be given to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or their successors in interest, by the County. If not corrected within the period indicated on said notice, the County has the right to correct the maintenance failure or to have it corrected at the expense of the Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest. 16. Any building that is constructed on .a lot.in this Plat shall be set at such an elevation so as to provide positive drainage away from any drainage entry point to the building (including but not limited to a window well, a window unprotected by a window well, or a doorway). Said positive drainage shall consist of a minimum -slope of 3% away from the building for a distance of at least 10 feet from the building. The lots shall be graded so that either a) all runoff is routed away from the building, and conveyed over the lotto a natural drainage swales or approved drainage facility, or b) drainage intercepted on the lots is disposes of on the lot in an approved drainage facility. The approved drainage facility shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file at the County Engineer's Office. Any revisions to the approved drainage plans must be approved by the County Engineer's Office prior to construction of said revisions. 17. This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road and drainage facilities as provided herein. Dated this day of , 19 . STANTON - SPOKANE L.P., A Washington Limited Partnership BY: STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A Washington General Partnership ITS General. Partner BY: HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A Washington Corporation, Partner BY: BY: ITS BY: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, A Washington Corporation Partner 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss County of ) . On this day of , 19 _, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared to me known to be the of DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, and partner of STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Washington General Partnership who is the General Partner of STANTON- SPOKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss County of NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane My commission expires On this day of , 19 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared , to me known to be the of HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, and partner of STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Washington General Partnership who is the General Partner of STANTON- SPOKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane My commission expires 3 NGU -01 -1995 13 46 FROM: DATE: I I /1 145 e CENTURY WEST ENGINEERING 509 624 0355 P.01 centurywest ENGINEERING CORPORATION FAX TRANSMITTAL TO: Ri ` M M MrD NAOrW — Spot CAD. Eu..a rsesl . .' PROJECT NUMBER NAME: NUMBER OF SHEETS Z (Including Transmittal) COMMENTS: �� T'� �/nn '�e_ / i- ' - &.. 0M tewd Cat en,�.c�C 4 7"`• 3 er 4 -•-% av \�G 3 reicai -4t r.. a rr lAno v... e r .- . re u. 0. Coo 1C-fir.' ; J a rt.t)f f 1 3 pc) y i. E A O T N G T H R O U G H E F F E C T I V E S O t U' I O N S West 1124 Riverside Pest Office Box 1906 Sp . Washington 99201 Phone:15091838 -3810 FAX: (50911124-0355 Primed on Recyded Poper. NON -01 -1995 13:47 CENTURY WEST ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT MANE: RIVERVALK - 3rd. ADDI „0N DESIGN ENGINEERING FIRM: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CONSTRICTION MONITORING BUDGET ESTIMATE PREPARED BY: CENTURY VEST ENGINEERING CORPORATION DATE: NOVEMBER 1, 1995 ITEM DESCRIPTION 509 624 0355 P.02 TOTAL E7 ETS CL DRAFT LABOR LABOR EXPENSES TOTAL LABOR RATES $84.13 $35.34 $30.07 $41.85 HOURS COST COST A EARTHWORK CUT 1 4 0 0 5 $225 $80 $305 8 EARTHYORN COMPACTION 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 50 C SUBGRADE 1 4 0 0 5 $225 $100 $325 D BASE COMPACTION 0 4 1 0 5 $171 $100 $271 E BASE DEPTH VERIFICATION 0 2 0 0 2 $71 $50 $121 F PAVEMENT MONITORING & REPORT 2 8 1 0 9 $410 $140 $550 6 CURBS 8 SIDEWALK 1 4 1 0 6 $256 380 $336 H DRAINAGE 1 8 2 0 IS $427 S50 $477 I EROSION CONTROL 1 4 0 0 5 $225 $40 $265 J FINAL REPORT i RECORD DRUGS 1 2 2 4 9 $382 $100 $482 TOTALS 8 38 7 4 48 $2,394 $740 $3,134 ROTES: 1. MATERIALS TESTING FOR AGGREGATES. PAVEMENT. i CONCRETE INCLUDED IN EXPENSES FOR THOSE ITEMS 2. THIS ESTIMATE IS PROVIDED FOR BOND CALCULATION PURPOSES. ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION MONITORING COSTS COULD VARY AND ARE LARGELY DEPENDENT UPON CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS SCHEDULE AND PRODUCTION RATES. PREPARED FOR: rAUL LENNEMANN SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE PROJECT PREPARER ? 5 1.2 1.4 15 16 17 18 19 texas 'ID W4 PA: a.ssr e404. secs Sv.mts P ox c2 (ri lFWE 7M6% Anew AMA' Feta IMOSAJJS SPOKANE COUNTY IZIUet WALIc 34 400 ITEM ri DESCRIPTION 1 TYPE "A" DRYWELL TYPE "B" DRYWELL TRIPLE DEPTH DRYWELL 4 FILTER FABRIC: LINING FOR TYPE A 8< B DRYWELLS BACKFILL FOR 6 TYPE 7 TYPE 8 TYPE 9 10 WSDOT TYPE 2 INLET BASE - 11 SPOKANE CO. 1 <: 48" PRECAST DRYWELLS 1 METAL GRATE 2 METAL- -GRATE METAL GRATE WSDOT TYPE 2 GRATE CONCRETE UNIT "H" CONC. INLET 7 I MANHOLE SOLID METAL LID 4yn.64o DITCH /208 EXCAVATION 10" ST SEWER - 15" ST SEWER - 21" ST SEWER -- 24" ST SEWER - 20 30" ST SEWER - 21 36" ST SEWER - ENGINEERING - DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES BOND ESTIMATE FORM DATE a I aT qi PROJECT NO. P FQLJANTITY PRICE 2 /65 � (S0 12" ST SEWER - USAF d- tP 1 a 7 TOTAL COST I &To $ 3Ub_,UU $ , 1 1- 7 (5 31 U $ 310.00 1. 4541 �� $ a{SO'01) NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS: I 646 pocor riir 1 &G&wAZK Y.AUtr) / <. L' S , s 75 v Tf/E (Alb, Cu-T) 1,4 / s '/00 6 s, TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: COMMENTS ON BON]) ESTIMATE: s w & Q s A-2 : 4$o-k' 3 G2 Woks ICl2/93 4S c1 i y913 13se:ill 1160 DEVELOPMENT NAME: RIVERWALK - 3rd. AD, JN DESIGN ENGINEERING FIRM: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MONITORING BUDGET ESTIMATE PREPARED BY: CENTURY WEST ENGINEERING CORPORATION DATE: NOVEMBER 1, 1995 ITEM DESCRIPTION 2. THIS ESTIMATE IS PROVIDED FOR BOND CALCULATION PURPOSES. ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION MONITORING COSTS COULD VARY AND ARE LARGELY DEPENDENT UPON CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS SCHEDULE AND PRODUCTION RATES. PREPARED F0. ,AUL LENNEMANN SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE TOTAL E7 ET5 CL DRAFT LABOR LABOR EXPENSES TOTAL LABOR RATES $84.13 $35.34 $30.07 $41.85 HOURS COST COST A EARTHWORK CUT 1 4 0 0 5 $225 $80 $305 B EARTHWORK COMPACTION 0 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 C SUBGRADE 1 4 0 0 5 $225 $100 $325 D BASE COMPACTION 0 4 1 0 5 $171 $100 $271 E BASE DEPTH VERIFICATION 0 2 0 0 2 $71 $50 $121 F PAVEMENT MONITORING & REPORT 2 6 1 0 9 $410 $140 $550 G CURBS & SIDEWALK 1 4 1 0 6 $256 $80 $336 H DRAINAGE 1 8 2 0 11 $427 $50 $477 I EROSION CONTROL 1 4 0 0 5 $225 $40 $265 J FINAL REPORT & RECORD DRWGS 1 2 2 4 9 $382 $100 $ TOTALS 8 38 7 4 48 $2,394 $740 NOTES: 1. MATERIALS TESTING FOR AGGREGATES, PAVEMENT, & CONCRETE INCLUDED IN EXPENSES FOR THOSE ITEMS I DATE ITEM INTITALS I Insp Bond city: Posted: Construction Started: Completed: Certification Documents Submitted: Accepted: Final Inspection (all Punchlist items complete) Inspection Bond Released: Construction Bond Released: tf Ol fib (, &Kit Atw T r Ik » aG � stivra4 cN t Imul4 ceigfirtz?w 4Ar (Pert (i&r guts iJ ‘i, MO 7 eNtc. Pk4. it I off" 'r1µ0 4' - s 10 Au yr UY ROAD NAMES CONSTRUCTION STATUS PROJECT NAME EIugRWli-.& P.u.Q. 3401si0 PROJECT # p /ckf4 SITE ADDRESS *LOTS , #ACRES PARCEL # SPONSOR CONSTR. ENGR. NAME NAME COMPANY COMPANY ADDRESS ADDRESS CITY CITY STATE /ZIP STATE /ZIP PHONE /fax PHONE /fax eMAIL eMAIL PERMITS ISSUED PERMIT # DATE DATE TO SCOPE DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director October 18, 1996 K. C. Construction P.O.Box 1455 Hayden Lake, ID 83835 Att: Mike Klicka Re: Riverwalk PUD 3rd Addition Dear Mike, Please be advised that the Construction Division accepts the quality of construction of the following system components: 7 -- J Al! mainline sewer pipe, manholes, and side - service stub -outs located beneath paved roadways within the platted boundaries of Riverwalk PUD 3rd Addition. The above acceptance will allow the Conty Utilities Department to establish a one year warranty period. Utilities will begin this period when all as -built drawings, 0 & M manuals, easements, and other related system components have been satisfactorily provided. Any additional defects observed in the system during the warranty period will be brought to your attention by the Spokane County Utilities Department. Very TrulyJj, James Radke, P.E. Construction Engineer C a U N T Y • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT T 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 January 5, 1998 W.O. 95618 Dean -Deily Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 Attn: Ed Dean INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. RreEi Re: Riverwalk P.U.D. 3rd Addition, Walk Through and Punchlist Dear Ed, At your request we met Monday morning November 24, 1997 on site to participate in a inspection walk through. Present at the meeting were; Jim Radke - Spokane County Engineers Office, Allen Arnold- Artistic Landscape, Todd Whipple - Inland Pacific Engineering, Bruce Howard - Inland Pacific Engineering, Ed Dean - Dean- Deily Company The following deficient items were noted for correction prior to final acceptance by Spokane County. This list of observed deficiencies in project construction is intended to serve as input to help you achieve project acceptance by Spokane County. The absence of constructed items from this list in no way that any unlisted item(s) have been approved or are approvable under current County Standards. By copy of this letter, we are notifying the County Engineer's staff that we have requested compliance on the issues listed below. Please contact as the deficiencies are being corrected, so that we can proceed with the project certification and acceptance by Spokane County in a timely manner. * As -built pond volume calculations need to represent actual depth of constructed ponds, not the assumed .5' depth noted in original submittal calculations. (IPE) * Remove filter fabric from all frame and grates ponds with established grass. * The cracks between the sidewalk and the back of curb will have to be cleaned, sprayed with herbicide, and injected with epoxy or grout mortar to stop the effects of freeze/ thaw cycles. (Typical throughout 3rd Addition.) * Sweep and clean all streets and sidewalks. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 -765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 Walk Through Punchlist page 2 * Install street and stop sign per the plan set and M.U.T.C.D.. (Typical all intersections.) * Finish grade, install irrigation, adjust rim elevations to match the plan set, and seed or sod ponds A2, and C2. Provide as -built drawings, and 0 & M manuals for the irrigation system suitable for Spokane County acceptance. Should you have any questions regarding this information please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering Bruce A. Howard Principal cc: Jim Radke, Spokane County April 3. 1997 Todd Whipple, P.E. Inland Pacific Engineering 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 SUBJECT: P1414G - Riverwalk 8th Addition Gentlemen: DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. johns, P.E., County Engineer Plan Submittal (WE letter dated March 19, 1997) • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane. WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 2F \1 /r ui 5 • We have considered your request. and have reviewed our files for the various phases of the Riverwalk project. The primary access point is located at the easterly end of Indiana in Riverwalk 6th. It appears that access to Riverwalk 8th is. by any routing plan, available only by traveling some distance on Indiana Avenue. At our last site visit on April 2. 1997. Indiana had not yet been paved from the east boundary of Riverwaik 2 2nd. through Riverwalk 6th, to the access point for Riverwalk 8th. We would like to note that the plat approval for Riverwalk 7th was granted in spite of the lack of approved plans for the Barker Road improvements. Those improvements became necessary due to the lot threshold which IPE had indicated would require those improvements. The plan acceptance of Riverwalk 7th was not affected by the acceptance of Indiana, as the primary access to most of the Riverwalk 7th lots is expected to occur from Mission Avenue. The County has been working with IPE since at least the Spring of 1996 on developing the construction documentation for those phases of Riverwalk which constructed Indiana. and the supporting drainage facilities. up to the westerly boundary of Riverwalk 6th (phases 1, 2. and 3). This was all so that following phases which access Indiana could have plans submitted and plats approved. The first submittal of the Record Drawings and supponing documents for phase 1 was received in November 1996. and comments were returned in December 1996. To date. the actions necessary to address the various comments noted in our review of IPE's submittals for phases 1. 2. and 3 have not yet been completed. We acknowledge receipt of the Phase I Record Drawings submitted at your meeting with Ed Parry on March 28. 1997. You also indicated in that meeting that the Record Drawings for phases 2 and 3 would be submitted by April 2, 1997. As you will recall, the plans for Riverwalk 4th and 5th also were not to be submitted until the County had accepted the construction and established Indiana for maintenance. This position was taken so that the Sponsor did not get placed in the position of having to maintain and plow what would be the major access into and through this large subdivision until the roads were fmally established as County- maintained roads. This is similar to the situation in the Westwood Subdivision, with which you are familiar. It is unfortunate that this position had to be taken on those projects. but it was the only option available to the County to encourage some action toward the acceptance of Indiana As the Sponsor demonstrated progress on the acceptance of Indiana, Todd Whipple, P.E. P1414G - Plan Submittal April 3, 1997 Page 2 of 3 the County relaxed that position to accepting the plans for review, and then construction, with plat approval of those phases to be granted when Indiana had been established. At our February 24, 1997 meeting with the Sponsor of phases 1, 2, and 3, we had indicated the County Engineer would be willing to consider granting Final Approval for Riverwalk 4th and 5th prior to acceptance of Indiana. This, however, was contingent upon continued progress toward the acceptance and establishment of Indiana. We are concerned that with the Record Drawings having been submitted, progress in processing the calculations to support the plan changes may stagnate. This will have an effect on the plat approvals for Riverwalk 4th and 5th. There are many items which can, and should be completed prior to the actual submittal of the Record Drawings and supporting documents. Among these items are any plan changes which are contemplated. Plan Change Requests should be treated in a fashion analogous to a Design Deviation Request in the project design process. If plan changes are necessary to account for field conditions. then the justification for those changes to include all supporting calculations. will need to be submitted. and then receive the County Engineer's approval, prior to submitting the Record Drawings. This is necessary so that (1) the processing of the Record Drawings is not delayed by the processing of the plan changes. and (2) so that Record Drawings are not returned due to plan changes which the County Engineer will not approve. This will also minimize the potential to re- record any additional easements which may result from the proposed plan change. We are enclosing a list which summarizes generally the actions necessary to address the different categories of the comments provided. Please refer to the actual comments (previously provided) for the specific items of concern. Our file search indicates that calculations showing how the revised ponds meet GSM requirements for water quality treatment and storage volume have not yet been submitted. Although the County Engineer's Office is primarily concerned with the calculations for ponds receiving runoff from public rights -of -way. calculations for all pond revisions (including those which serve only the private roads) are needed as pan of the public record for this project. We will allow the submittal of road and drainage plans for Riverwalk 8th and 9th Additions at this time. In light of the above, we do not feel that it would be prudent to accept for construction plan submittals for those additional projects which can be expected to have their primary access from Indiana, until Indiana has been accepted. and established by the County for maintenance to the point of primary access. This includes Riverwalk 9th, as well as Riverwalk 8th. Todd Whipple, P.E. P1414G - Plan Submittal April 3, 1997 Page 3 of 3 Please let us know, in writing, when the other supporting documents for Riverwalk 1st, and the Record Drawings and supporting documents for Riverwalk 2nd, 3rd. and 6th will be submitted; we would also like to Imow when to expect any Plan Change Requests which may be needed. I would appreciate your response by April 9. 1997. If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry, either by letter, or by telephone at 456- 3600. Sincerely, William A. Johns. P.E. Spokane County Engineer KItT t Edward Parry, Jr.. P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: Project file: P1414. P1414A, P1414B. P1414C. P14140, P1414E, P1414F, P1414G, P1414H Spokane County Public Works Director: Dennis Scott, P.E. Spokane County Engineer's Office: Bill Johns. P.E.. Bill Hemmings. P.E., Ed Parry, P.E.. Dean Fnnx. P.E. Sponsors: Riverwalk lst, 2nd. 3rd. 4th, 5th: Ed Dean/Mark Hancock. Dean Housley Company. 16720 N.E. 116th Street. Redmond. WA 98052 Rivenvalk 6th: Mike Hume. Tomlinson Black North. 8205 North Division. Spokane. WA 99208 Riverwalk 8th Rivenvalk 8th: Mike Miller, P.E. /Doug Birch. Pacific Properties Incorporated. 14410 Bel -Red Road. Bellevue, WA 9807 Rivet 9th: Mike Klicka. P.O. Box 1455. Hayden hake, ID 83855 P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D., phases 1, 2, and 3 Construction Items - Record Drawings and Inspection Reports This list summarizes the Review Comments on the Construction Documents and Record Drawings submitted to date. Refer to the actual Review Comments for spe 4 tems Riverwalk 1st: _.Asphalt depth: Credit rec'd from Inland Asphalt (per action necessary 3'11 Johns) - No _.Concrete gutter depth: Cash payment rec'd from Cameron - No action necessary ..Excessive accelerator in c gutter at Indiana /McMillan: still need ...__ _Cation from Winkler (per 24 Feb 97 mtg w/ Dean H.ousley Co.)Pending removal & replacement per IPE 28 Mar 97 letter _ cation systems in swales serving Indiana: st need to be installed, & Record Drawings submitted O. Need to establish vegetation in all swales 5. Pond issues: a. Ponds too deep: IPEC needs to submit plan change showing intended :.ept_h of t bScil & sod or ponds need to be constructed Per plans or - tests need to b done & results submitted showing compliance to GSM for either _ ..c.:ic carbon content or cationic exchange capacity. b. Ponds too shallow: Ponds need to be reconstructed, or IPEC needs _ rov_de clan change requesting revisions, to include talcs c. Pond footprint not per plan: IPEC needs to provide plan chance w/calcs showing that the new layout meets GSM regt'S or ponds need to be constructed per approved plans Note: _. 2PE's letter of 25 Mar 97 indicates the actions necessary tc address some of these issues. 2. pond calcula need to address all affected elements of the pond design, including but not limited to: 208 volume, total storm volume, 208 depth (floor to rim), depth from normal curb flowline to drywell rim (minimum of 0.4'), etc., Field corrective actions also need to consider these elements. °. Mission /Harmony:. Sidewalk was not located per approved plans. Plan Change approved by County Engineer did not indicate an existing utility riser which may interfere with the approved change. Plan Change needs to be revised. IPE to resubmit Plan Change 9. Need to complete any remaining items on IPE's punchlist. When the contractor has corrected all IPE punchlist items, IPE needs to provide written certification of punchlist completion to County Engineer's Office. P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D., phases 1, 2, and 3 Construction Items - Record Drawings and Inspection Reports Riverwalk 2nd: 1. Need to complete IPEC's punchlist When the contractor has corrected all IPE punchlist items, IPE needs to provide written certification of punchlist completion to County Engineer's Office. 2. Drywells at Indiana 11 +54 (east end of Riverwalk 1st) will be viewed as part of Riverwalk 2nd, since they receive runoff from swales in Riverwalk 2nd 3. Grates at Indiana 11 +53: Constructed without recll_red sump shown on plans. Need calcs to show that new grate elevations provide adequate inlet capacity, or set grates to plan elevations 4. Need to construct southerly interceptor swale, or adjust onsite drainage swales accordingly 5. Ponds: a. Ponds too deep: IPEC needs to submit plan change showing intended depth of topsoil & sod or ponds need to be constructed per plans or topsoil tests need to be done & results submitted showing compliance to GSM for either organic carbon content or cationic exchange capacity. b. Ponds too shallow: Ponds need to re reconstructed, or IPEC needs to provide plan change recuestinc revisions, to include calcs c. Pond footprint not per plan: IPEC needs to provide plan change w /talc_ showing that the new layout meets GSM seat's or ponds need to be constructed per approved plans See note for this item under 1st Addition 5. Irrigation systems in swales serving Indiana: still need to be installed, & Record Drawings submitted 7. Need to establish vegetation in swales Riverwalk 3rd: 1. Need to complete IPEC's punchlist. When the contractor b.as corrected all IPE punchlist items, IPE needs to provide written certification of punchlist completion to County Engineer's Office. 2. Ponds: a. Ponds too deep: IPSO needs to submit plan change showing intended depth of topsoil & sod or ponds need to be constructed per plans or topsoil tests need to be done & results submitted showing compliance to GSM for either organic carbon content or cationic exchange capacity. b. .Ponds too shallow: Ponds need to re reconstructed, or IPEC needs to provide plan change requesting revisions, to include calcs P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D., phases 1, 2, and 3 Construction Items - Record Drawings and Inspection Reports c. Pond footprint not per plan: IPEC needs to provide plan change w /calcs showing that the new layout meets GSM reqt's or ponds need to be constructed per approved plans See note for this item under 1st Addition I. Irrigation systems in swales serving Indiana: still need to be installed, & Record Drawings submitted 4. Need to establish vegetation in swales e 7671 Post -it • Fax Note Date / ! �7 p " a o ges 1# Ti e To VCV Re- �aG nbs e-v,- From i t'AVNL/t1 L CoJD _ •104 1 Co. 1 re_ Phone # C1 I me, 1 0 p Phone # ts4 - e .V� ' e9 T Fax# g2-I Cc 14- Fax # ( 4 G -/ T• FAX COVER SHEET SPOKANE COI/MY- ENGINEERS bad FLOOR FAX 0 (509)37.4-7655 1026 W. BROADWAY $PO PRONE 0 (509)32}765' tCANF WA 99260 PRONE Y (509) 45-3600 DATE: 23 Mav 97 TO: COMPANY: CITY/STATE: TO: COMPANY: CITY/STATE: V 11 • this CAC. Lain -.cjG L s2,,1 a ". Todd Whipple, P.E. FAX tl: 458 -6844 WE Mark Hancock FAX ff: 206/8694620 Dean Housley Co. NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): FROM: S Parry. P -F. W (Plans Review, x257) SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk 1st Major Items of Work Remaining S. Establish vegetation in disturbed areas of swain A, B, F 6. Fix cross - gutter, curb returns, and sidewalk at Indiana/McMillan (failed flow test, concrete is cracking) 7. Verify Op rim and floor elevations in swale F 8. Bring als invoices up to date, not just those over 30 days 9. Verify rework of Mission Avenue sidewalk r.tu Todd/Mark: Mark's letter of 22 May 97 indicated that a Final Inspection has been scheduled for 28 May 97. Was it intended for the County to attend that also? These are the major items that I can think of off the top of my head. More items may be turned up as the result of a Final liupection by the County. I mentioned most of these to Brian Housley when he called me yesterday. P1414 - Riverwalk 1st (1 through 8 for certain will need to be completed prior 0 acceptance of Indiana) 1. Mitigation payment for out-of-spec materials (Clay paver brick used to adjust CB rim at 11 +24 LT): Need payment of 51950 from Developer's side of the project in lieu of rework 2. Irrigation system Record Drawings: Still need 3. Sidewalk repair on North side of Indiana: Replace about a damn panels between the radius point of the Keystone wall and the sidewalk ramp at the westerly side of Harmony /Indiana (damage by phone to., settling) 4. Sidewalk repair on South side of Indiana: About 2 or 3 panels to replace (cracked or settling) Rivertralk Major work items - Indiana Avenue Page 2 These are some Items I noticed when I drove through the site this morning: P1414A - Riverwalk 2nd 1. Establish vegetation in swain receiving runoff from Indiana 2. Irrigation system Record Drawings: Still need 3. Remove "eyebrow" temporary turnaround at Indiana/Snake River Lane. This was supposed to happen when Indiana was extended - please refer to the Design Deviation for the Snake River entry /temporary turnaround 4. Check/replace sidewalk/curb: need to field check 5. Bring BE invoices up to date, not just those over 39 days - P1414B - Riverwaik 3rd 1. Complete work in avales receiving runoff from Indiana 2. Irrigation system Record Drawings: Still need 3. Bring aal Invoices up to date, not just those over 30 days TOTAL P.02 April 3, 1997 Todd Whipple, P.E. Inland Pacific Engineering 707 West 7th Avenue. Suite 200 Spokane. WA 99204 Gentlemen: DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer SUBJECT: P1414G - Riverwalk 8th Addition Plan Submittal (IPE letter dated March 19, 1997) • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director We have considered your request, and have reviewed our files for the various phases of the Riverwalk project. The primary access point is located at the easterly end of Indiana in Riverwalk 6th. It appears that access to Riverwalk 8th is, by any routing plan, available only by traveling some distance on Indiana Avenue. At our last site visit on April 2, 1997, Indiana had not yet been paved from the east boundary of Riverwalk 2nd, through Riverwalk 6th, to the access point for Riverwalk 8th. We would like to note that the plat approval for Riverwalk 7th was granted in spite of the lack of approved plans for the Barker Road improvements. Those improvements became necessary due to the lot threshold which IPE had indicated would require those improvements. The plan acceptance of Riverwalk 7th was not affected by the acceptance of Indiana, as the primary access to most of the Riverwalk 7th lots is expected to occur from Mission Avenue. The County has been working with IPE since at least the Spring of 1996 on developing the construction documentation for those phases of Riverwalk which constructed Indiana, and the supporting drainage facilities, up to the westerly boundary of Riverwalk 6th (phases 1, 2, and 3). This was all so that following phases which access Indiana could have plans submitted and plats approved. The first submittal of the Record Drawings and supporting documents for phase 1 was received in November 1996, and comments were returned in December 1996. To date, the actions necessary to address the various comments noted in our review of IPE's submittals for phases 1, 2, and 3 have not yet been completed. We acknowledge receipt of the Phase 1 Record Drawings submitted at your meeting with Ed Parry on March 28, 1997. You also indicated in that meeting that the Record Drawings for phases 2 and 3 would be submitted by April 2, 1997. As you will recall, the plans for Riverwalk 4th and 5th also were not to be submitted until the County had accepted the construction and established Indiana for maintenance. This position was taken so that the Sponsor did not get placed in the position of having to maintain and plow what would be the major access into and through this large subdivision until the roads were finally established as County- maintained roads. This is similar to the situation in the Westwood Subdivision, with which you are familiar. It is unfortunate that this position had to be taken on those projects, but it was the only option available to the County to encourage some action toward the acceptance of Indiana. As the Sponsor demonstrated progress on the acceptance of Indiana, 1026 W. Broadway .Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 Todd Whipple, P.E. P1414G - Plan Submittal April 3, 1997 Page 2 of 3 the County relaxed that position to accepting the plans for review, and then construction, with plat approval of those phases to be granted when Indiana had been established. At our February 24, 1997 meeting with the Sponsor of phases 1, 2, and 3, we had indicated the County Engineer would be willing to consider granting Final Approval for Riverwalk 4th and 5th prior to acceptance of Indiana. This, however, was contingent upon continued progress toward the acceptance and establishment of Indiana. We are concerned that with the Record Drawings having been submitted, progress in processing the calculations to support the plan changes may stagnate. This will have an effect on the plat approvals for Riverwalk 4th and 5th. There are many items which can. and should be completed prior to the actual submittal of the Record Drawings and supporting documents. Among these items are any plan changes which are contemplated. Plan Change Requests should be treated in a fashion analogous to a Design Deviation Request in the project design process. If plan changes are necessary to account for field conditions, then the justification for those changes, to include all supporting calculations, will need to be submitted. and then receive the County Engineer's approval, prior to submitting the Record Drawings. This is necessary so that (1) the processing of the Record Drawings is not delayed by the processing of the plan changes, and (2) so that Record Drawings are not returned due to plan changes which the County Engineer will not approve. This will also minimize the potential to re- record any additional easements which may result from the proposed plan change. We are enclosing a list which summarizes generally the actions necessary to address the different categories of the comments provided. Please refer to the actual comments (previously provided) for the specific items of concern. Our file search indicates that calculations showing how the revised ponds meet GSM requirements for water quality treatment and storage volume have not yet been submitted. Although the County Engineer's Office is primarily concerned with the calculations for ponds receiving runoff from public rights -of -way, calculations for all pond revisions (including those which serve only the private roads) are needed as part of the public record for this project. We will allow the submittal of road and drainage plans for Riverwalk 8th and 9th Additions at this time. In light of the above, we do not feel that it would be prudent to accept for construction plan submittals for those additional projects which can be expected to have their primary access from Indiana, until Indiana has been accepted, and established by the County for maintenance to the point of primary access. This includes Riverwalk 9th, as well as Riverwalk 8th. Todd Whipple, P.E. P1414G - Plan Submittal April 3, 1997 Page 3 of 3 Please let us know, in writing, when the other supporting documents for Riverwalk 1st, and the Record Drawings and supporting documents for Riverwalk 2nd, 3rd, and 6th will be submitted; we would also like to know when to expect any Plan Change Requests which may be needed. I would appreciate your response by April 9, 1997. If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry, either by letter, or by telephone at 456- 3600. Sincerely, William A. Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Edward J. Parry , Jr., P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: Project file: P1414, P1414A, P1414B, P1414C, P14140, P1414E. P1414F, P1414G, P1414H Spokane County Public Works Director: Dennis Scott. P.E. Spokane County Engineer's Office: Bill Johns. P.E., Bill Hemmings, P.E., Ed Parry. P.E., Dean Franz. P.E. Sponsors: Rivenvalk lst, 2nd. 3rd, 4th, 5th: Ed Dean/Mark Hancock, Dean Housley Company, 16720 N.E. 116th Street, Redmond, WA 98052 Riverwalk 6th: Mike Hume. Tomlinson Black North. 8205 North Division. Spokane, WA 99208 Riverwalk 8th Rivenvalk 8th: Mike Miller, P.E. /Doug Birch. Pacific Properties Incorporated. 14410 Bel -Red Road. Bellevue. WA 98007 Rivenvalk 9th: Mike Klicka, P.O. Box 1455. Hayden Lake. ID 83855 P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D., phases 1, 2, and 3 Construction Items - Record Drawings and Inspection Reports This list summarizes the Review Comments on the Construction Documents and Record Drawings submitted to date. Refer to the actual Review Comments for specific items Riverwalk 1st: 1.Asphalt depth: Credit rec'd from Inland Asphalt (per Bill Johns)- No action necessary 2.Concrete gutter depth: Cash payment rec'd from Cameron - No action necessary 3.Excessive accelerator in cross - gutter at Indiana /McMillan: still need mitigation from Winkler (per 24 Feb 97 mtg w/ Dean Housley Co.)Pending removal & replacement per IPE 28 Mar 97 letter 4. Irrigation systems in swales serving Indiana: still need to be installed, & Record Drawings submitted 5. Need to establish vegetation in all swales 6. Pond issues: a. Ponds too deep: IPEC needs to submit plan change showing intended depth of topsoil & sod or ponds need to be constructed per plans or topsoil tests need to be done & results submitted showing compliance to GSM for either organic carbon content or cationic exchange capacity. b. Ponds too shallow: Ponds need to be reconstructed, or IPEC needs to provide plan change requesting revisions, to include calcs c. Pond footprint not per plan: IPEC needs to provide plan change w /calcs showing that the new layout meets GSM reqt's or ponds need to be constructed per approved plans Note: 1. IPE's letter of 28 Mar 97 indicates the actions necessary to address some of these issues. 2. Pond calculations need to address all affected elements of the pond design, including but not limited to: 208 volume, total storm volume, 208 depth (floor to rim), depth from normal curb flowline to drywell rim (minimum of 0.4'), etc.,. Field corrective actions also need to consider these elements. 8. Mission /Harmony: Sidewalk was not located per approved plans. Plan Change approved by County Engineer did not indicate an existing utility riser which may interfere with the approved change. Plan Change needs to be revised. IPE to resubmit Plan Change 9. Need to complete any remaining items on IPE's punchlist. When the contractor has corrected all IPE punchlist items, IPE needs to provide written certification of punchlist completion to County Engineer's Office. P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D., phases 1, 2, and 3 Construction Items - Record Drawings and Inspection Reports Riverwalk 2nd: 1. Need to complete IPEC's punchlist When the contractor has corrected all IPE punchlist items, IPE needs to provide written certification of punchlist completion to County Engineer's Office. 2. Drywells at Indiana 11 +54 (east end of Riverwalk 1st) will be viewed as part of Riverwalk 2nd, since they receive runoff from swales in Riverwalk 2nd 3. Grates at Indiana 11 +53: Constructed without required sump shown on plans. Need calcs to show that new grate elevations provide adequate inlet capacity, or set grates to plan elevations 4. Need to construct southerly interceptor swale, or adjust onsite drainage swales accordingly 5. Ponds: a. Ponds too deep: IPEC needs to submit plan change showing intended depth of topsoil & sod or ponds need to be constructed per plans or topsoil tests need to be done & results submitted showing compliance to GSM for either organic carbon content or cationic exchange capacity. b. Ponds too shallow: Ponds need to re reconstructed, or IPEC needs to provide plan change requesting revisions, to include calcs c. Pond footprint not per plan: IPEC needs to provide plan change w /calcs showing that the new layout meets GSM regt's or ponds need to be constructed per approved plans See note for this item under 1st Addition 6. Irrigation systems in swales serving Indiana: still need to be installed, & Record Drawings submitted 7. Need to establish vegetation in swales Riverwalk 3rd: 1. Need to complete IPEC's punchlist When the contractor has corrected all IPE punchlist items, IPE needs to provide written certification of punchlist completion to County Engineer's Office. 2. Ponds: a. Ponds too deep: IPEC needs to submit plan change showing intended depth of topsoil & sod or ponds need to be constructed per plans or topsoil tests need to be done & results submitted showing compliance to GSM for either organic carbon content or cationic exchange capacity. b. Ponds too shallow: Ponds need to re reconstructed, or IPEC needs to provide plan change requesting revisions, to include calcs P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D., phases 1, 2, and 3 Construction Items - Record Drawings and Inspection Reports c. Pond footprint not per plan: IPEC needs to provide plan change w /calcs showing that the new layout meets GSM reqt's or ponds need to be constructed per approved plans See note for this item under 1st Addition 3. Irrigation systems in swales serving Indiana: still need to be installed, & Record Drawings submitted 4. Need to establish vegetation in swales Gentlemen: Sin ft DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Wiliam A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer October 11, 1996 Ed Dean Mark Hancock Dean Housley Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, WA 98052 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Addition P1414A - Riverwalk P.U.D. 2nd Addition Riverwalk P.U.D. 3rd Addition SuTimittal of Construction Documentation and Record Drawings We have had several discussions with you and your engineer (Inland Pacific Engineering) over the past 6 months regarding the expected submittal of the Record Drawings and Construction Documentation for these projects. As you will recall, the County's original position was that the Plats of 2nd and 3rd Additions would not receive Final Approval until all the work for Indiana Avenue was completed by your contractor, certified by your engineer. and accepted by the County Engineer's Office. This resulted from your failure to secure a permit for the work in the right of way for Indiana Avenue prior to starting construction. I am concerned that you will be submitting these documents at a point in time when the weather will not allow (a) a proper Final Inspection to take place, and /or (b) corrective action to be properly made on items of deficient work. I need to see a submittal of all the construction documentation, to include certified Record Drawings. no later than 12:00 noon, October 31, 1996. This submittal will need to comply with the requirements of Section 9 of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, as well as the guidance I have provided to your engineer in my earlier discussions and correspondence with them. If this does not occur, I will be forced to take further actions as are necessary to ensure that this material is submitted in a timely fashion; these actions may include revocation of approach permits, restriction of lot building permits, et al.,. If you have any further questions or comments, please contact me at 456 -3600. Thank you. Willi i . Jo Spokane County ngineer A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director cc: project file Spokane County Public Works Director: Dennis Scott, P.E. Spokane County Engineer's Office: Bill Hemmings, P.E., Ed Parry, P.E. SpolcacseUatEmikar r$lfeaa;,gabd3bogeo -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer November 13, 1995 Inland Pacific Engineering Inc. 707 W. 7th Suite 200 Spokane WA 99204 Riverwalk 3rd Addition Bruce: The Spokane County Engineering Department has completed the "Fatal Flaw" of the submittal as per the letter dated Nov 8th. The County did not observe any major discrepancy from the standards which would affect the construction/acceptance process of the roads and drainage. If you have any questions, please call. William A. Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Pte. Edward J. Pknv.3rJ. P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: file A DrvISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 • October 20, 1995 W.O. No. 95527 Louis Webster Spokane County Planning W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 -0240 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. RE: Riverwalk TIA C/ y i y 15 Dear Mr. Webster: r RECEIVED OCT 2 3 1995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER I have received comments from WSDOT in response to the traffic impact analysis (TIA) prepared for this project. After completion of this TIA, a document called the Barker Road Traffic Impact Analysis and - Corridor Study was prepared .which superseded the information in the TIA. in its - discussion of the interchange ramp .terminal intersections. This corridor study soon be published as a technical appendix to the Morningside Heights EIS, and the information in it directly affects the ultimate recommendations for mitigation for the Riverwalk development. Due to the fact that this corridor study will soon he out, and that it supersedes the Riverwalk TIA in regards to the interchange ramp terminal intersections, I will not address WSDOT concerns where these intersections are concerned. After a review has been made of the corridor study, I will respond to any questions which remain unanswered. At this time I have the following responses to WSDOT concerns in their July 10, 1995 letter which deal with issues other than the interchange ramp terminal intersections. A justification based on existing traffic distribution (ie: turning movements) or traffic modeling needs to be provided to substantiate the diversion of traffic projected onto Euclid Avenue as indicated in Page 15 of the study. As you are aware, Riverwalk is close to the Spokane Industrial Park, a major source of employment in the Spokane Valley. It is reasonable to assume that some residents of Riverwalk will work at this major employment center, and since Euclid Avenue is the entrance to the Spokane Industrial Park from Barker Road, it is reasonable to assume that some part of -the traffic from this residential center will use this route. The study only has 6% of the:total•traffic using this route, which could easily be too low as congestion continues to worsen 'and people begin to locate near where they work. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 509- 458 -6840 FAX: 509- 458 -6844 Riverwalk WSDOT Response October 20, 1995 Page 2 As a side note, we at Inland Pacific Engineering are somewhat concerned about this comment in general. This route choice is entirely in the county and the county has jurisdiction over all aspects of this route and the intersections associated with it. I am concerned that this comment came from the WSDOT, as it does not involve a WSDOT facility. As for the WSDOT comments regarding the intersection of Trent Avenue (SR 290) and Barker Road, the Riverwalk TIA showed that at some time in the future, this intersection would begin to function at unacceptable levels of service. Since at build out Riverwalk is projected to have about 6% of the traffic at this intersection, recommending the design for a signal at this location, is the logical mitigation for an unsignalized intersection level of service problem. Engineering costs are typically 10% of the total construction costs, and having a design on the shelf and ready to go will expedite the construction process when that procedure becomes necessary. Therefore, when the amount of traffic we add to the intersection is 6 %, a 10% contribution seems more than fair. If you have any questions on this, or if you need more information, please let me know. As I stated previously, the Barker Road Corridor Study supersedes the Riverwalk TIA with respect to the intersections at the I -90 interchange ramp terminals and answering comments in regards to these intersections at this time is not appropriate. Sincerely, g 6 \41,,„ Ann L. Winkler, P.E. cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers Leonard Cash, WSDOT November 8, 1995 Todd Whipple, P.E. 1 PEC SUBJECT: P1414B - Riverwalk 3rd Addition Submittal Accepted Gentlemen: We have conducted a general evaluation of your recent submittal for this project, and we find that this submittal appears to meet the minimum standards of the Spokane County Standards fpj Road and Sewer Construction ( "SCRS "). We are, therefore, able to accept your approval of the plans and calculations for this project. I am enclosing a sepia print of your approved road and drainage plans for this project: the originals are on file at the Public Works Department. A copy of your approved drainage calculations is also enclosed. In accordance with Section 5.02.D of the SCRS, this acceptance is valid until October 30, 1995. If the facilities are not constructed, you may request an extension of the acceptance for an additional two years; the plans shall be revised to reflect current standards prior to granting the extension. Please note: 1. The County's acceptance of this submittal does not relieve the sponsor or his agents from any liability related to portions of the design that are not in conformance with the SCRS, or which do not follow good engineering practice; 2. All permits and notifications necessary prior to construction are the responsibility of the project Sponsor and /or his assigned agents; and 3. The County will not release the bond for construction services under this project until (a) all construction documentation and certified Record Drawings have been submitted and accepted; and (b) all construction deficiencies noted in the County's Acceptance Inspection have been corrected (for swales "A2" and "C2 "). 4. Since (a) the private road accesses from the portion of Indiana Avenue to be constructed as part of the improvements in Riverwalk 2nd Addition; (b) the right -of -way for that portion of Indiana Avenue will not exist until that plat is finalized; and (c) Riverwalk 2nd Addition will not be allowed to finalize until Indiana Avenue is constructed and accepted, then P1414B - Riverwalk 3rd Addition Submittal Accepted November 8, 1995 Page 2 of 2 Final Plat approval for Riverwalk 3rd Addition will not be granted by the County Engineer's Office until the Final Plat of Riverwalk 2nd Addition has been recorded. 5. Per our October 30, 1995 meeting, a "fatal flaw" check of the plans and calculations (for ponds "A2" and "C2 ") has not yet been accomplished. The County will conduct a "fatal flaw" check and advise you of the results. As you agreed at this meeting, any "fatal flaws" uncovered by our check will be corrected prior to the County's acceptance of the improvements indicated on the project plans. If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, William A. Johns, P. E. Acting Spokane County Engineer Edward J. Parry, Jr., P.E. Plan Review Engineer encls: Plans (4 sheets) - sepia Drainage Calculations cc: project file Pat Harper Dave Berto Permit Technician - Sylvia Lightfoot reviewer Project Sponsor: Dean Housley Company (Verne Jacobsen) - via fax Spokane County Staff Review Checklist for Pre - Submittal Meeting Project Name: g r-k veP(AIlat $tt Z , Pk. 3 Project Number ' (+A Project Sponsor: �. Sponsor's Engineer: Firm: T Oa- Meeting Date: 2- At 45 Meeting Time: O! °. ) County Staff Present at Meeting: n Other Meeting Attendees: name /representing 0 Rae ber44 name/representing AevtAlw5 description nepe'M4 nor 1Ma y Rb*D lAtneeskart5pallsoal Nernst description M IMPR .t% Z t Acarlk ' frvt5•45 ?tom WAN' SrGak 5 FOR AUMAJt< , PijjWP it) Vet description Design Engineer: Wes tteX0M4 name /representing name /representing The Following Items need to be Discussed w/ the Design Engineer General Items 1. List any special requirements listed in the Conditions of Approval, EIS, or MDNS. 7-7511U. St.6 "ThAcfit mOtQ shof K The "GIM Sot -Pre* b sxt Alwaah[. reference eW401 et, reference description reference reference Tea Gµ, be .454r6 etatts tt description reference no )c.Arf enact. un t✓ TsA- is cores Lerno bye (task 4 Give Standard Notes to the � D �� e 1 � s � ign Engineer. Identify which Special Notes will apply, if any. (s w C """" ew Road Plans Road Classifications and Design Criteria. Note (1) Additional right -of -way may be given by the Sponsor. Discussion AezotciM tt ATte+ *414 rfe° -ID »MN3E csakcanu, - rte ar RzYtAD segt l P t( 2. According to the Design Engineer, what is the maximum number of units which will have access from a single roadway? What is the max. allowed per Sec.1.03? 1 4 : z 6 : do 4/- Minimum intersectio ctng is 300' for along a Principal or Minor Arterial (per Sec. 3.04), and 150' for a Collector or Local Access street. What spacing is provided for this project? >(50 Are any off -site slope easements needed, or off -site right -of -way acquisition needed? If so, desc tbe. #1 #2 #3 #4 Street Name IADcltaft. ' o ( � Classification ,_ , 0.,t,6Qb pi "•> P&4t� Roadway Width, W ' 9 46' Minimum right -of -way width see note (1) Min. Horiz. Curve w/ super Min. Horiz. Curve w/o super General Land Slope /Terrain Design Speed, mph Curb Type & Clear Zone (see Sec. 3.15) Sidewalk required? (yes /no) tiES - 2 STds6 Road Plans Road Classifications and Design Criteria. Note (1) Additional right -of -way may be given by the Sponsor. Discussion AezotciM tt ATte+ *414 rfe° -ID »MN3E csakcanu, - rte ar RzYtAD segt l P t( 2. According to the Design Engineer, what is the maximum number of units which will have access from a single roadway? What is the max. allowed per Sec.1.03? 1 4 : z 6 : do 4/- Minimum intersectio ctng is 300' for along a Principal or Minor Arterial (per Sec. 3.04), and 150' for a Collector or Local Access street. What spacing is provided for this project? >(50 Are any off -site slope easements needed, or off -site right -of -way acquisition needed? If so, desc tbe. Street Name Turn- around Type Location IN1)4+0Pr Gut.- OE -SAt.- 1tnfltoR. tlAo teat ea- J• What type ofturn- arounds are needed? (i:e. cul -de -sac, hammerhead, etc.) Ftgi tni71124 AT Road Surfacing Requirements (Sec. 3.16)A0a 444- y a) What method in determining road surfacing re use (i.e. AASHTO Design Method, R -valu b) Provide the DesignEngr. a copy of thei (oil Sample ProcedureSesign Report Format & Alt Pavement Design Tabl} Mtn Does the Engineer plan on applying for any Design Deviations? If so, briefly describe below. IASC $4ttkr pmtros pusue- Tuat4Iii2weib Suter Sc rter46 (AIMLUUD) 3trsfs Fait fagrAMIN ActeS5 Storm Drainage esign Engineer propose to r other)? Basin Map a) Did the Design Engineer bring to the meeting a basin map? 1415 . If so, does the basin map show topography and sufficient information to be useful? ifif b) Does the basin map depict any contributing off -site runoff flowing onto the property? 46 Does it appear to be correct? NCI . If not, explain. telw uget. to goiter .ato sK4**44 “Arr5 e*F oFFsats Mertr& it) sa. S!r c) Is a site visit needed to verify the basin limits? Mir kr Schedule for: • IRS Tow Is the site located within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? 1 R . What type of water quality treatment is proposed by the Design Engineer? ZOO Irgert “. What subsurface investigations, if any, are needed with this project to make sure the proposed disposal process will function as planned. Note - ft/atSr..t “Avetk 4. Are there downstream conditions which will affect the design of drainage facilities. If so describe possible mitigative measures. 5. Is maintenance access provided to each `208' swale or drainage pond? If there is something unusual, what requirements were given to the Design Engr.? Wlu. fQwtoe Miter et JAI A&A:s To bleytcEu. ukintiott SDc What does the Developer/Engr. propose for providing for perpetual maintenance of the drainage facilities? Please briefly describe proposed mechanism, and what is needed to accomplish this. 44p tI1Mwt W1L.4/ - th // tinik 7. Are Erosion Control Measures required with this project. If so, briefly describe applicable re uirements. fry- /tastes sypiaes%7 tortfltw) tN d%cikozz S Note: Provide a copy of this completed document to the Design Engineer at the end of the pre - design meeting. S(&M ➢E514N Ccrlcepi $aklLS Al i n tor-1 EI&NT :: `' 1 i'4 -tamp o►�& L► e,.P 4higa t-a u61.Ei r : It— oay„ gELGASE" ' l Re(jite90 src t cE Cala PsU.f G"Vt icN NEE D6)? e 5ttr3µ ? y6D z 44 ite SDKNNa to C takkGrui4 egtiatatitAn14 seat/tefl #Je't Wt t}S PAC LF aaa4 CAL cut-en •N S. it4atakepir onrcc 4E OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer March 3, 1995 Michael Hunt North Idaho Engineering 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 Gentlemen: A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director SUBJECT: P1414A - Riverway Villa P.U.D., phase 2 vP1414B - Riverway Villa P.U.D., phase 3 Completion of Preliminary Actions Prior to Plan Submittal We have recently received several submittals of plans and calculations for these projects, and I note that as of March 1, 1995, the Traffic Impact Analyses for these phases of the project have not yet been initiated, much less completed. I would like to draw your attention to the Conditions of Approval for this Plat. The Conditions of Approval from the Division of Engineering and Roads from the most recent time extension reads. "1. All previously imposed conditions are still applicable. "3. As per the original conditions of approval: "A traffic analysis will be required of the developer and reviewed by Spokane County prior to plat finalization. This analysis will be coordinated with the Washington State Department of Transportation. A traffic analysis for each phase will serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Should the analysis determine a need for intersection upgrading, the developer will be assessed a proportionate share for the required improvements. "4. Prior to any plat checking of Riverway Villa for phased finalization of the plat the aforementioned analysis shall be completed." (emphasis ours) 1076 W Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 1 P1414A - Riverway Villa P.U.D., Phase 2 P1414B - Riverway Villa P.U.D., Phase 3 Completion of Preliminary Actions Prior to Plan Submittal March 2, 1995 Page 2 of 3 It is quite clear that the Conditions of Approval require the Traffic Impact Analysis to be coordinated with WSDOT; further reading of the original conditions indicates that WSDOT will have the final say as to the adequacy of the analysis and any required mitigation on the part of the developer. This affects both Phase 2 and Phase 3 of this plat. As you have been informed by Mr. Parry of our office, the term "completed" means that the submitted work meets the requirements of the agencies having jurisdiction, and that no further revisions to the submitted work are necessary; "completed" does not mean that the required work has been merely submitted to the reviewing agency (or agencies). If that were the case, then any submittal to our office could be considered "complete ". As a result of our meeting in July 1994, in which we discussed the Traffic Impact Analysis requirements for phase 1, we understood that NIE would ensure that the proper sequence of Traffic Impact Analysis and plan submittal would be followed; that is, the Traffic Impact Analysis for a particular phase would be completed to the satisfaction of the WSDOT prior to the submittal of any road and drainage plans for that phase. I would also draw your attention to the fact that the P.U.D. Approval for the portion of this plat located north of Indiana has not yet occurred; this affects Phase 2. Given the status of both the required P.U.D. Approval and the required Traffic Impact Analyses, we will not review these submittals until all the required preliminary actions are completed. It is a misuse of the time of the County plan review staff, and the Developer's money, to review plans which are very likely to change due to land use requirements, or due to traffic impacts before the land use requirements and traffic impacts have been finalized. We will not assign these projects a location in the plan review priority list, as that would unfairly penalize those Developers who have completed all the necessary preliminary requirements prior to submittal of their road and drainage plans. P1414A - Riverway Villa P.U.D., Phase 2 P1414B - Riverway Villa P.U.D., Phase 3 Completion of Preliminary Actions Prior to Plan Submittal March 2, 1995 Page 3 of 3 So that these submittals do not become misplaced while the Traffic Impact Analysis and the P.U.D. Approval are being completed, we request that you retrieve these submittals until all the applicable preliminary actions are completed. The plans and calculations for these submittals are available for your pickup at the Engineer's Reception counter in the Public Works Building. If you have any other questions in these matters, please contact us at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, William H. Hemmings, P. E. — Development Services Administrator cc :roject file reviewer Spokane County Public Works Director - Dennis Scott, P.E. Spokane County Engineer - Ron Hermann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer's Office - Gary Kennaly, P.E. Spokane County Planning Department - Wally Hubbard Jon Peterson Spokane County Prosecutor's Office - Ron Arkills Developer: Stanton Spokane Limited Partnership, ATTN: Edward Dean, 16720 NE 116th, Redmond WA 98052 FAX COVER SHEET c 2(5 Spokane County Engineer's Office - Third Floor Fax # 324 -3478 1026 W BROADWAY SPOKANE, WA 99260 - PHONE # (509) 456 -3600 FAX 4: ?AS/66 3901 DATE: TO: COMPANY: CITY / STATE: NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): -- 1 FROM: Not�x $Ttt.Fo Cix Coa.1R D` /tt t+ E , - PAbM &et MESSAGE /SPECIAL INSTRUCTION: 4- Gentlemen: OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer February 15, 1995 Edward Dean Stanton Spokane L.P. 16720 N.E. 116th Redmond, WA 98052 Michael Hunt, P.E. North Idaho Engineering 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 SUBJECT: P1414A - Riverwalk, Second Addition vP1414B - Riverwalk, Third Addition Traffic Impact Analysis A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director This letter is to inform you that plan review of these phases will not be started until (a) the portion of the project north of Indiana Avenue receives Final P.U.D. approval from the Spokane County Planning Department (Phase 2); and (b) the traffic impact analysis required for each phase is completed, i.e., existing conditions surveyed, impact due to this development projected, mitigating measures resolved, and any necessary construction by the Developer completed (or the necessary sureties posted with WSDOT). I note that you provided the 1st submittal of road and drainage plans for Riverwalk Second Addition (P1414A) on 12 December 94, and for Riverwalk Third Addition (P1414B) on 8 Feb 95. I also note that you have not yet submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis for either of these phases. I would like to draw your attention to the following Conditions of Approval for this project: 1. March 1982, Engineer Condition #24: "...A traffic analysis of each phase will be required of the developer and reviewed by Spokane County prior to plat finalization. This analysis will be coordinated with the State of Washington Department of Transportation..." 2. August 5, 1993 Time Extension a. Division of Engineering & Roads (Updated), Conditions "1. All previously impose conditions are still applicable." "4. Prior to any plat checking of Riverway Villa for phased finalization of the plat the aforementioned analysis shall be completed." 1026 W Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 - 3478 TDD: (509) 324 - 3166 P1414A - Riverwalk 2nd Addition P141413 - Riverwalk 3rd Addition Traffic Impact Analysis; Plat Checking February 15, 1995 Page 2 of 3 As you will recall, the review comments for the second submittal of Phase 1 of this project were completed in June 1994, but held pending completion of the traffic analysis and coordination of the same with WSDOT. The review comments were not released until the County had received some assurances from your representative (at our meeting on 26 July 1994) that the traffic analysis would be performed and mitigating measures resolved with WSDOT. As a result of that July 1994 meeting, we also understood that the required traffic impact analyses would be completed in a timely fashion for any future phases of this project. To date, the mitigating measures for Phase 1 have been resolved and designed; apparently either construction or payment to WSDOT by the Developer, or posting of adequate surety by the Developer, remains to be completed. Since the identification and resolution of traffic impacts is key to approval of any plat phasing on this project, I have no choice but to inform you that there will be no plat checking of Phase 2, Phase 3, or any other future phase of this project, unless and until all relevant land use actions are completed , and the required traffic analysis is completed. Mr. Jim Legat, P.E., the Acting Utilities Director, informs me that the County Utilities Department will continue to check plans submitted to them, but there will be no plan approvals issued until these matters are resolved. In addition, there will be no approach permits or utility construction permits issued for these future phases until the traffic analysis is completed and the road and drainage plans approved. This decision is based on the reasoning that because (1) there are pending land use actions which will likely affect the road layout, and (2) there are Conditions of Approval which must be completed prior to any plat checking (and which may also affect the facilities to be constructed as part of the phase in question), a review of any plans submitted prior to completion of these key activities in the plan approval process would not be an effective use of our plan reviewers' time. The effective use of our staff time is particularly important in light of the number of submitted plans for projects which have completed land use actions and met other Conditions of Approval. When the pending land use actions for Phase 2, as well as the traffic impact analysis for Phase 2 and Phase 3 are completed, the respective plans submitted for these phases will be reviewed. If you so desire, we can return these recent submittals to you, pending any revisions which may be necessary following the completion of the pending land use actions and traffic impact analyses; please call to let us know if the plan submittals should be returned to you. P1414A - Riverwalk 2nd Addition P1414B - Riverwalk 3rd Addition Traffic Impact Analysis; Plat Checking February 15, 1995 Page 3 of 3 Please be advised also that the road and drainage plans for Phase 1 will not be approved until all actions required by WSDOT for the mitigating measures required under Phase 1 have been completed, e.g., Developer's Agreements, posting of surety, etc.,. If you have any questions about this decision, please contact me at (509)456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P. E. Spokane County Engineer EJP /EJP cc: Spokane County: Public Works Director.- Dennis Scott, P.E. Engineer's Office - Gary Kennaly, P.E. Bill Hemmings, P.E. Utilities Department - Jim Legat, P.E. Planning Department - Wally Hubbard Jon Peterson John Nunnery Prosecutor's Office - Ron Arkills Washington State Department of Transportation, Region 6 - Greg Figg project file reviewer May 23, 1996 I.P.E. W.O. #95618 Dean - Housley Building Corporation 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 ATTN: SUBJECT: Dear Verne: DRAINAGE PONDS 1 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Mr. Verne Jacobsen, Superintendent Construction Deficiency List Riverwalk 3rd Addition Spokane County, Washington 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 - 765 -7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 RECEIVED MAY 2 9 1996 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER This letter transmits a list of constructed items for the above referenced residential development that are currently in non - conformance with approved project plans and specifications and applicable Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. These items must be corrected prior to submittal of project record drawings, and prior to calling for final inspection and approval of the construction by the County Engineer's office. This letter is based on items observed during a site visit on May 21, 1996,•and is limited to areas of the improvements whose adequacy could be visually determined at the time of our visit. The five stormwater retention /disposal ponds (A2,B1,B2,C1,C2) have three non- conforming items in common: Pond bottoms not flat. Some topsoil, no landscaping (sod or hydroseed) or irrigation installed. Irregularly dimensioned pond bottoms and 3:1 sideslopes not met. POND "A2" Grouting of pipe into drywell under sidewalk and in catch basin must bej completed. ,Drainage structures need to be cleaned of all foreign material: - Riverwalk 3rd Addition Page2of3 " Curb inlet structure has negative flow (low point on street side, not on pond side). • Minimum pond bottom dimensions not met (too small). POND "81" " Curb inlet is broken and detached from curb (when completed, inlet structures should be fixed in place). V` POND "B2" " Curb inlet has negative flow and is not back filled on downstream (pond) side., " Drainage structures need to be cleaned of all foreign material. " Grouting around both ends of pipe, and drainage structure riser rings is insufficient. POND "C1" " Inlet structure is broken. POND "C2" " Inlet structure is separated from curb. • Form boards around concrete inlet structure must be removed and structure back filled. • Drainage structures needs to be cleaned of all foreign material. ADDITIONAL ITEMS There is prominent undermining of the curb along most of the south side of Michielli Lane east of Salmon River Lane. The curb has begun separating from the AC pavement along portions of the road. You will submit a plan for review and approval by, the Engineer prior to repair of undermined curb, sidewalk and road sections. Riverwalk 3rd Addition Page 3 of 3 Salmon River Lane is undermined, with a void up to a 4 foot depth measured beneath the PCC pavement at the SE corner of Michielli and Salmon River Lane. Your repair plan is subject to review and approval prior to implementation. There are bird baths along the gutter line around the SW corner of Michielli and Salmon River Lane and along the west side of Salmon River Lane. " There are backhoe outrigger marks in the asphalt that result in a non-conforming These marks are generally located in front of utility service locations. This list of observed deficiencies in project construction is intended to serve as input to help you achieve project acceptance by Spokane County. The absence of constructed items from this list in no way implies that any unlisted item(s) have been approved /are approvable under current County Standards. Our preparation of this letter in no way releases the contractor from his responsibility for constructing the improvements per approved project plans and specifications, and applicable sections of the current Spokane County Standards. By a copy of this letter, we are notifying the County Engineer's staff that we have requested compliance on the above issues. Please contact us when the above deficiencies have been corrected, so that we can proceed with the project certification and acceptance by Spokane County in a timely manner. Respectfully Submitted, INLAND PACIFIC E NGINEERING Jetty E. Peterson, P.E. Project Engineer cc: Bill,dohns, County Engineer, Spokane County Public Works Parry, Plan Review Engineer, Spokane County Public Works Jim Radke, Construction Engineer, Spokane County Public Works Terry Lightfoot, Chief Inspector, Spokane County Public Works Ed Dean, Dean Housley Company a 19581 7\defclst3.wp AIIan Jackson From: AIIan Jackson Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 12:46 PM To: Alysa Wiyrick Cc: John Hohman; Wayne McGavran Subject: Updated surety inspection information Alysa, Listed below are status updates for 8 projects. We will update the surety inspection spreadsheet accordingly unless we hear differently from you. Two projects, SP1251 A and PE 1750D, will be marked incomplete and require additional action. SP 611 -90 — Single Residence Page 1 of 3 No information pertaining to this project was found in any City of Spokane Valley file locations. It is impossible to do additional research without knowing where or when this construction took place Recommendation — Consider this project closed. SP 1251A — UR 3.5 Single Res. Alteration This project is located on the north side of Valley Way immediately east of Evergreen Road. The only information found in the files was a single 2002 construction plan sheet and several designs for 208 drainage swales. No bonding information, certification package, or record drawings available. All work (ACP paving on Valley Way, sidewalk, curb & gutter, drywells, swales, etc.) appears to have been completed except for seeding the Tract E drainage swale. Construction of a commercial building and two homes has been completed and construction of the remaining residence is almost finished. This project was recently constructed so there should be more information available. Is the main portion of the file located somewhere that we (and Julie) have not been able to find? Could the information be found under a different file name? Is it possible that Simpson Engineers has the missing information? Was a walk- through conducted by John or Sandra? Shouldn't this project require a warranty bond? We will not be able to update the current status of this project and make a recommendation without more information. PE 1414B — Riverwalk 3 Addition The construction bond was released on 5/27/99 by Bill Hemmings, Spokane County Development Services Engineer, after Spokane County acknowledged receiving a $2,123.00 warranty bond. This warranty bond was to be limited to one year expiring on 4/20/00. However the actual warranty bond, bond number, or name of the bonding company was not found in the files. A field review noted that the major part of the project is now designated private roads. No deficiencies were noted on Indiana Avenue, the only public road within the project limits. Recommendation — Consider this project closed without further action. The warranty bond can be released later in the event it did not automatically expire. 3/9/2006 PE 1750D — Shelley Lake 4 Addition Page 2 of 3 Bob Graham, STI Northwest Inc, requested a bond reduction on 8/28/03 but no action has been taken on that request. Washington Trust Bank verified the $71,500 construction Letter of Credit is still valid. We could not find that certification package deficiencies noted by Kevin Severance on 12/3/04 have been addressed. We reviewed the punch list developed by John Hohman and Ryan Spidahl, Metro Engineering, on 7/16/04. The current condition of deficient items is described below: 1. Catch basin raised and apron replaced — not done 2. Cracks in curb & gutter — large cracks filled with rubberized adhesive and smaller cracks patched with epoxy. 3. Ponds A & B not finished — Pond A irrigated and seeded. Pond B still has not been final graded or the weeds removed. 4. Pond A has crack in inlet — Crack has been epoxy patched. Cracking noted in several aprons on Pond A but do not appear significant enough to replace aprons. 5. Pond C relocated but not noted on as- builts — Pond C has evidently been constructed opposite Pond D in the undeveloped area. Both ponds have only been rough - graded. It also appears the size of Pond C will be decreased if Shelley Lane is extended. John Hohman requested a new drainage plan to be submitted but no record in files that this has been done. The developer may be waiting before finishing the ponds since housing construction is still ongoing adjacent to the unfinished ponds. Recommendation — This construction is all on private roads. Does the City of Spokane Valley have an interest in roadway construction in addition to the 208 ponds and will a warranty bond be required? In any case the redesigned plan for Pond C should be submitted and the punch list items resolved before reducing or releasing the surety bond. Please let me know if there is more that we can do to speed up the process. The following files were not found either downstairs or across the street. We even had Julie check to make sure we didn't overlook them. PE 1339 — Alcott Grove Addition File not located. According to spreadsheet bond was issued in 1984 and released in 2001. Consider this file closed since no other information available. PE 981 — Southern Mobile Home Park File not located. According to spreadsheet bond was issued in 1980 and released in 2000. Consider this file closed since no other information available. PE 1345 — Kirken Guthrie /Carpenter File not located. According to spreadsheet bond was issued in 1985 and released in 2001. Consider this file closed since no other information available. PE 1649F — Evergreen Pt. 6 Addition 3/9/2006 1'11 work on the Valley Pines legal letter and have it ready for you to review tomorrow. Allan Jackson 3/9/2006 Page 3 of 3 File not located. According to spreadsheet bond was issued in 1991 and released in 2000. Consider this file closed since no other information available. SHP 01 -04 Jochium Short Plat OK — warranty review due in 2007 BSP 00 -48 Spokane Valley Mall Indiana Avenue It is likely the escrow account is no longer valid and a warranty bond was never established. Therefore, we recommend this project be considered closed with no further action necessary. PE 1750 Shelley Lake PUD Lake and Shelley Lake 1st Addition The cracked and settling sidewalk will require replacing in the near future. However, unless the missing bond holder mentioned above suddenly appears, there is no obvious option that would require the developer to make good on its repair. Our recommendation, unless there is another altemative that can be used to hold the developer accountable, is to consider this project closed without further action. PE 1885 Prairie Orchard Request the submittal of as -built Record Drawings bearing an Engineer's Stamp. Release the surety bond in full without requiring a warranty bond following receipt of the as- builts. We will write the letter explaining this to Landworks Wayne McGavran From: John Hohman Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 8:01 AM To: Wayne McGavran Cc: Alysa Wiyrick; Henry Allen Subject: RE: List of project needing response to recommendations Ok to all. Wayne please write the applicable letters to close out the projects or notify developers where necessary. Thanks. 6/14/2006 Original Message From: Wayne McGavran Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:53 AM To: John Hohman Cc: Alysa Wiyrick; Henry Allen Subject: List of project needing response to recommendations Page 1 of 3 John, Shown in the table below are projects awaiting a response to our recommendations. Please see the e- mail pertaining to each project or ask us if you need more information. 6/14/2006 Page 2 of 3 Development if you agree with our recommendation. PE 1852 Strawther's Addition Do nothing further until future status of project determined. PE 1860 Keystone Meadows Send letter releasing warranty bond and close project. PE 1848 Bradley Heights Send letter to Jim Mahar Homes, the developer, to remove fabric from drywelis along Mission Avenue with a reminder to complete swale construction before warranty bond can be released. SP 611 -90 Single Residence Consider this project closed. SP 1251A UR 3.5 Single Res. Alteration Project complete except for remaining 208 swale. Release bond in full once sod is placed in swale. PE 1414B Riverwalk 3 Addition Consider this project closed PE 1750D Shelley Lake 4 Addition The redesigned plan for Pond C should be submitted and punch list items corrected before reducing or releasing the surety bond. PE 1339 Alcoa Grove Addition Consider this project closed. PE 981 Southern Mobile Home Park Consider this project closed. PE 1345 Kirken Guthrie /Carpenter Consider this project closed. PE 1649F Evergreen Pt. 6th Addition Consider this project closed. PE 1414K Riverwalk Commercial Request `Record Drawings' and project Certification be submitted. Have developer remove fabric and replace frame and grate on drywell with one meeting County Standards. Upon completion of these items, release bond and close project with no further action needed. PE 1751B Midilome East 2nd Addition Consider this project closed. PE 1206E Summerfield East 5 Addition Have John or Alysa conduct a walkthrough with contractor to verify replacement of cracked sidewalk 6/14/2006 Page 2 of 3 Wayne 6/14/2006 panels and determine necessary swale improvements. Have developer remove fabric from drywells and inlets. Once this has been done and corrections made, release warranty bond and consider the project closed. Page 3 of 3 November 1, 1996 W.O. No. 96106 & 95618 Spokane County Public Works W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Sincerely, Inland Pacific Todd R. Whipple, P.E. TRW /tw eering Co., Inc. cc: Dean - Housley, Mark Hancock tile 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 in INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Attn: Bill Johns, P.E., Spokane County Engineer Re: Riverwalk 3rd Addition- Construction Certification Package Dear Bill: Per your request please find the following information which is intended to be reviewed by the County and used in the certification process for Riverwalk 3rd Addition. 1. A three -ring bound set of inspection and testing reports for the work constructed. Included within this binder are the following sections which document the scope and nature of the inspection work provided. A. Correspondence B. Test Reports C. Daily Reports 2. A set of mylars and two paper copies for review and comment. Please note that these mylars are new mylars and should replace or supplement the mylars that the County currently has for this project. It should be understood that this submittal provides certification for the initially constructed and approved construction items associated with this project. This certification only implies that the items shown were substantially built as designed, and only valid the day the as -built survey and visual certification were performed by this engineer. This certification makes no guarantee that other construction activities associated with overall plat build out such as home builders or new home owners have not in fact dislodged, destroyed, filled in or in any manner affected any of the items certified. It should be noted that this letter does not relieve the contractor or developer from the warranties implied within their bonding documents. Should you have any questions or comments related directly to the certification package submitted please do not hesitate to call. 0 OFRGir. 11 r CERTIF PROJEG i DATE AC_ .. 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 P'°'r.! 1VED NOV p 1 1996 SPOMNL tr kt -0EER OF .. )CUMENT v., 11 _ 'PLH ; iAW�NGS s `iQ - ._ D: lt- November 1, 1996 W.O. No. 96106 & 95618 Spokane County Public Works W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Dear Bill: Todd R. Whipple, P.E. TRW /tw cc: Dean - Housley, Mark Hancock file ir INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Attn: Bill Johns, P.E., Spokane County Engineer Re: Riverwalk 3rd Addition Construction Certification Package Should you have any questions or comments related directly to the certification submitted please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Inlajtd Pacific Fugigeering Co., Inc. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 RECEIVED NOV 0 1 1996 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Per your request please find the following information which is intended to be reviewed by the County and used in the certification process for Riverwalk 3rd Addition. 1. A three -ring bound set of inspection and testing reports for the work constructed. Included within this binder are the following sections which document the scope and nature of the inspection work provided. A. Correspondence B. Test Reports C. Daily Reports 2. A set of mylars and two paper copies for review and comment. Please note that these mylars are new mylars and should replace or supplement the mylars that the County currently has for this project. It should be understood that this submittal provides certification for the initially constructed and approved construction items associated with this project. This certification only implies that the items shown were substantially built as designed, and only valid the day the as -built survey and visual certification were performed by this engineer. This certification makes no guarantee that other construction activities associated with overall plat build out such as home builders or new home owners have not in fact dislodged, destroyed, filled in or in any manner affected any of the items certified. It should be noted that this letter does not relieve the contractor or developer from the warranties implied within their bonding documents. ackage COUNTY ENGINE-6-6,s ` Ofr As ! 4 OFFICIAL PUBLIC DOCUMENT C F ORIGINAL "AS- BUILTS" CERTIFIED RECORD BAWINGS PROJECT #• Y14 'tb DATE ACCEPTED: 1 ' "' i MAR -05 -1998 15:14 1 Bruce A. Howard INLAND PACIFIC ENG la INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Telephone: (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 FAX TRANSMITTAL. DATE: ! March 5, 1998 ; NO. OF PAGES: TO: Jim Radke i FAX NO.: COMPANY: 1 Spokane County i PHONE NO.: FROM: f Bruce Howard i JOB NO.: PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk 2n and 3 Additions ORIGINAL IN MAIL: p' YES 0 NO Including Cover Sheet 324.3478 456.3600 95617, 95618 P.01 NOTES: Jim.. Per our phone conversation this afternoon, please find enclosed a copy of Riverwalk 2n and 3 Addition walk through notes and punchlist's. If you have any further questions concerning any of these matters, please feel free to contact me. January 5, 1998 W.O. 95618 Dean-Deily Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 Attn: Ed Dean Re: Riverwalk P.U.D. 3rd Addition, Walk Through and Punchlist Dear Ed, I re INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. At your request we met Monday morning November 24, 1997 on site to participate in a inspection walk through. Present at the meeting were; Jim Radke - Spokane County Engineers Office, Allen Arnold- Artistic Landscape, Todd Whipple - Inland Pacific Engineering, Bruce Howard - Inland Pacific Engineering, Ed Dean - Dean- Deily Company The following deficient items were noted for correction prior to final acceptance by Spokane County. This list of observed deficiencies in project construction is intended to serve as input to help you achieve project acceptance by Spokane County. The absence of constructed items from this list in no way implies that any unlisted item(s) have been approved or are approvable under current County Standards. By copy of this letter, we are notifying the County Engineer's staff that we have requested compliance on the issues listed below. Please contact as the deficiencies are being corrected, so that we can proceed with the project certification and acceptance by Spokane County in a timely manner. * As -built pond volume calculations need to represent actual depth of constructed ponds, not the assumed .5' depth noted in original submittal calculations. (IPE) * Remove filter fabric from all frame and grates in ponds with established grass. * The cracks between the sidewalk and the back of curb will have to be cleaned, sprayed with herbicide, and injected with epoxy or grout mortar to stop the effects of freeze/ thaw cycles. (Typical throughout 3rd Addition.) * Sweep and clean all streets and sidewalks. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane. WA 99204 509 - 458-6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208 - 769 -7277 Walk Through Punchlist 957-'i $ page 2 • * Install street and stop sign per the plan set and M.U.T.C.D.. (Typical all intersections.) * Finish grade, install irrigation, adjust rim elevations to match the plan set, and seed or sod ponds A2, and C2. Provide as -built drawings, and 0 & M manuals for the irrigation system suitable for Spokane County acceptance. Should you have any questions regarding this information please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering Bruce A. Howard Principal cc: Jim Radke, Spokane County OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TO: JIM RADKE FROM: DAVE BERM DATE: June 21, 1956 SUBJECT: BOND ITEMS F1414B RIVERWALK 3Rn ADD The bond for the above mentioned project is for the followirca items: 1) Ali the items on the approved road and drainage plans. c:\wPdoc\dave\memo\items I Z !SERF /R& Douglas B. Sollitt Vice President Builder Banking June 7, 1996 Mr. Bill Johns Spokane County Engineer 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 Ref: Developer /Borrower: Stanton - Spokane, L.P. Our Loan No.: 8467777703 -26 Funds in the amount of $2,743.00 are being set -aside in a construction loan in the name of Stanton - Spokane, L.P. (developer /borrower), et ux, in lieu of a bond, for the purpose of assuring completion and installation of storm drainage in Riverwalk 3rd Addition (development) in accordance with the drawings and specifications as submitted to and approved by the County of Spokane Engineer's Office on October 31, 1995. No funds will be disbursed from this set -aside without the prior written authorization of the Spokane County Engineer. This set aside of funds will not be revoked without the consent of the County Engineer. In the event that the completion and acceptance of the above -named improvements for maintenance by the County of Spokane are not accomplished within a period of one year from the date of this agreement. All funds remaining in the set -aside will be forfeited to the County of Spokane upon written request by the Spokane County Engineer's Office to BANK OF AMERICA NW, N.A., doing business as SEAFIRST BANK, successor by name change to SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association. It is understood and agreed that upon the forfeiture of the funds to the County of Spokane, that the County of Spokane will then undertake completion of the subdivision to be accomplished within twelve (12) months from the date of the forfeiture of funds. It is further understood and agreed that in the event of any shortage of funds to complete improvements, the County of Spokane may have recourse against Stanton - Spokane, L.P. (developer /borrower) named above. Seafirst Bank shall be under no liability for non - completion of the work, its obligations being expressly limited to holding and disbursing the set -aside funds as agreed in the agreement. It is specifically understood and agreed by the parties, that in holding funds for this development BANK OF AMERICA NW, N.A., doing business as SEAFIRST BANK, successor by name change to SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association is not serving as guarantor for any additional costs incurred by the County of Spokane in the completion and acceptance of the above -named improvements. Seafirst Bank Builder Banking /Real Estate Center /10500 N.E. Eighth Street, Suite 400 /Bellevue, Washington 98004 Telephone (206) 585 -6462 FAX (206) 585 -6475 SE4FIRST ACCEPTED AND APPROVED this 7th day of June, 1996. STANTON - SPOKANE L P., a Washington lirnited partnership By: DEAN - HOUSLEY, LLC. a Washington limited liability company General Partner By: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION a Washington corporation Member Brian Housley Member SEAFIRST BANK By: By: P. Edward Dean, President 6� 4/ cCe Douglas Sollitt Vice President OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER By: O Its: 1ST BOND REDUCTION PROJECT P14145 RIVERWALK 3RD ADD NAME DAVE BERTO DATE 05- 1un-86 DRAINAGE ITEMS . UNITS LDUANITY . PRICE COST 1) Dr)wreil - Type A EA 1250.00 0.00 2) Drywe4l - Type B a 25% EA 0.5 1560.00 780.00 3) Grate - Type 1 EA 315.00 0.00 4) Grate Type 2 EA 340,00 0.00 5) Grate - Type 4 § 2 2596 EA 0.5 300.00 150.00 a) Back For 4W 0 25% CY 20 16.00 220.00 7) Concrete Inlet 0 25% EA 0.25 750.00 187.50 8) C. . apa 1 0 " Dia. LF 2 0.00 9) '±pe 12 !Dia. 0 25% LF 3.5 27.00 94.50 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Ora. _. 27.30 0.00 11) 014. Pipe 18` via. LP 31.50 0.00 12) Precast Mannoie EA 1500.00 0.00 13) Solid lid EA 310.00 0,00 14) Ditch/208 Excavation 0 100% CY 42 '0.00 -120.00 15) Sod 0 100% SF 1120 0.70 7 91.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) 0.00 2) 0,00 3) 0,00 4) 0.00 5) 0.00 o) 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 2743.00 16) Monuments EA ! 85.00 0,00 17) Barricade LF :3.00 0,00 18) Street Signs EA 35.00 0.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK NON- STANDARD ROAD ITEMS OTHER SUBTOTAL 0.00 19) Rougn Grade CY 10.00 0.00 20) Top Course CY 16.00 0.00 21) ease Course CY 16.00 0.00 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 44.40 0.t0 23) Curb Type A LF 7.00 0.00 24) Curb Type B LF 3.00 0.00 25) Curb Type R LF 8.00 0.00 26) Sidewalk SQ YD 16.70 0.00 1) . 0.00 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING 0.00 USE $2,800.00 GRAND TOTAL ( 2,743.00) BOND ESTIMATE PROJECT Riverwalk 3rd 14148 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS NAME pl DATE 05Jun -96 DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST 1) Drywell - Type A EA 1250.00 0.00 2) Drywell - Type B EA 2 1560.00 3120.00 =, 3) Grate - Type 1 EA 315.00 0.00 4) Grate Type 2 EA 340.00 0.00 5) Grate - Type 4 EA 2 300.00 600.00 6) Backfill For DW CY 80 16.00 1280.00 7) Concrete Inlet EA 1 750.00 750.00 8) C.M. Pipe 10" Dia. LF 23.00 0.00 9) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. LF 14 27.00 378.00 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. LF 27.80 0.00 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. LF 31.50 0.00 12) Precast Manhole EA 1500.00 0.00 13) Solid lid EA 310.00 0.00 14) Pond Excavation CY 42 10.00 420.00 .: J; ) 15) Sod SF 1130 0.70 791.00 1) Wilbert Vault Curb Inlet EA 250.00 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 5) 0.00 6) 0.00 16) Monuments EA 185.00 0.00 17) Barricade LF 33.00 0.00 18) Street Signs EA 85.00 0.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 7339.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL 0.00 19) Rough Grade CY 10.00 0.00 20) Top Course CY 16.00 0.00 21) Base Course CY 16.00 0.00 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 44.40 0.00 23) Curb Type A LF 7.00 0.00 24) Curb Type B LF 8.00 0.00 25) Curb Type R LF 8.00 0.00 26) Sidewalk SQ YD 16.70 0.00 NON -STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING 0.00 GRAND TOTAL (7,339.00 c: \wpdoc \dave \memo \items OFFICE OF xiii: COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TO: JIM RADEE FROM: DAVE BERM DATE: October 3, 1996 SUBJECT: BOND P1414P. & P14140 RIVERWALK 2ND & 3RD The bond for the above mentioned projects is for the following items: 1) P.11 the items on the approved road and drainage plans with the exception Of the Sod for the "208" swales. 2) A bond issued by Hartford Insurance Group October 2,1996 Is for both plats. $39,726.14 For Riverwalk 2ND $2,743.00 For Riverwalk 3?� KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that K.C. CONSTRUCTION, INC. (CONTRACTOR), as "Principal ", and HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY (bonding company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut, as "Surety ", are held and firmly bound unto Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, as "Obligee ", in the penal sum of FORTY -TWO THOUSAND, FOUR HUNDRED SIXTY NINE & 14/100 DOLLARS ($42,469.14), lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which the Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, said Principal is a contractor to the Developer of a tract of land in Spokane County divided and platted into lots and known as RIVERWALK SUBDIVISION, 2ND AND 3RD ADDITIONS, and being located in Spokane County, Washington, and said County has required that a bond be furnished in an amount sufficient to pay the construction costs of grading and surfacing to the approved grades and typical section of the roadways of said Plat and the installation of drainage structures and such other work as is incidental and necessary thereto, all in accordance with the Contract Documents between Principal and Developer dated September 6, 1995, and those Plat Roadway Improvement Specifications and plans dated October 31, 1995, and to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Engineer. Such improvement reached substantial completion on or about October 1, 1996; however, such date may be extended at the option of the Spokane County Engineer. Upon failure of the Principal to comply with the requirements stated herein within the time authorized, and upon delivery of the written notice thereof of Obligee to Surety, the Surety shall be obliged to the Obligee up to the penal sum of this Bond. The obligation of this Bond shall be kept in full force and effect until, in the opinion of the Obligee, the requirements herein stated have been satisfied, in which event written release will be given by the Obligee, the Obligee having sole right to grant such release. SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED this 2ND day of October, 1996. PRINCIPAL SUBDIVISION ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT BOND K.C. CONSTRUCTION, INC. By ;22 Its Preside-, f M IkI k6 1K4 Bond No. 5094288 The Hartford Insurance Group Hartford Plaza Hartford, Connecticut 06115 SURETY HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY By: W.W. WELLER, Attorney -in -Fact Sr n fl DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director Seaf Ea:3'z 10500 N.E. Eighth Street Suite 40;0 Sellev:_le WA. 9S004 Attn: no B. c' Liea.r : 2nf a ; P14 Star;-7sn-o•k b. P. rq • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • PETP ic%• .7 ECIV thcElt the Set Ae :tun No. cc-Tpany furetv for inetallati cf roade and aociated.drainac:e factlitieE :Mr the al mentic pLatE, datef june 7, 19t7 in the cur.rent to:al amount of -."42,45P.12 MEV ncw re If have an .7;:=2:EiCE:2, feel free to call :ffice Oct 3, 199 David ;:ertc 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 • (509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 April 16, 1997 W.O. 95618 Ed Parry, P.E. Spokane County Engineers 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 RE: P1414 Riverwalk P.U.D. 3rd Addition Record Drawings, Submittal No. 2 Dear Ed, I rr INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. At this time we are submitting the record drawing information for the public and private streets of Riverwalk 3rd. Once the ponds are sodded and irrigated, we believe that all public facilities in Riverwalk 3rd will be ready to be accepted by Spokane County. We had previously sent you a record drawing submittal of Riverwalk 3rd, and on February 11, 1997, you responded with a letter containing your review comments on the 1" submittal. Below, we have attempted to address your comments in the same order as your review comments. Your comments are noted in italics with the response in bold. General 1. Has the Fire District approved the revisions for the Salmon River Lane configuration? Fire District approval was required for submittal acceptance of the engineering plans; a copy of the approval letter is attached. 2. Have all punchlist items identified by the Construction Engineer been completed? The majority of punchlist items have been completed. A new punchlist is being prepared to address any items that still require attention. A copy of the punchlist is attached. 3. The wording "or my agent" is acceptable only on this project. Since the County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction do not include these words, they should not be included on Record Drawing submittals for future projects. Thank You. Sheet 4R: 1. Detail at pond A2 should be coordinated with the revised layout for Salmon River Lane. Completed. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 - 765 -7784 • FAX: 208 - 769 -7277 Riverwalk 3r Record Drawing April 16, 1997 Page 2 2. The County will be able to conduct a final inspection on pond A2 and C2 when the systems have been installed and the swale vegetation has been established. You will be notified when the landscaping and irrigation has been installed and is operational. A construction deficiency letter to the sponsor for work that needs to be performed on Riverwalk 3` so that final inspection can occur, is attached. In general, the roadway construction for this project, is essentially complete. At this point, drainage items are the primary concern requiring work for acceptance. With this being the case, we feel that the bond for Riverwalk 3` should be reduced to 10% to handle these issues. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Inlaid Pacific ineering, Inc Todd R. Whipple P e, TRW /trw /jdp Enc.- record drawing mylars, two sets of prints, supporting soil testing information cc: Mark Hancock, Dean Housley Company file SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 qcig 10319 EAST SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WA 99206 -3676 • (509) 928 -1700 • FAX (509) 927 -2227 Bruce Howard Inland Pacific Engineering 707 W. 7th Ave Suite 200 Spokane, Wa. 99204 Re: Riverwalk Gated Entrance - DOWAUL 34 Dear Mr. Howard, December 18, 1995 RECE{V EL% DEC 21 1995 I.P.E. The Spokane Valley Fire Department's requirements to the gate and roadway to the Salmon River Lane have been met. Curb radius had to be changed to 30 feet. Should you have any questions, please call me. KM:bd Sincerely `s7 Ke in Miller Fire Inspector April 14, 1997 I.P.E. W.O. #95618 Dean-Deily Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 ATTN: Mr. Mark Hancock, Project Manager SUBJECT: Construction Deficiency List Riverwalk 3rd Addition Spokane County, Washington Dear Mark: This letter transmits a list of construction items for the above referenced residential development that are currently in non - conformance with approved project plans and specifications and applicable Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. These items must be corrected prior to finalization of project record drawings, and prior to calling for final inspection and acceptance of the construction by the County Engineer's office as well as any bond reductions. This letter is based on items observed during a site visit on 4 April 1997, and is limited to areas of the improvements whose adequacy could be visually determined at the time of our visit. This letter is an addendum to our 23 May 96 letter regarding deficiencies in Riverwalk 3rd Addition construction. The re- inspections required to verify the construction items listed below are special service. Please authorize by signing at the bottom of this letter and fax back to Bruce Howard for approval. DRAINAGE PONDS POND B2 The concrete inlet requires cleaning. POND C2 The apron on the curb inlet type 1 has separated from the curb, an apparent grouting attempt has failed and re- grouting is required. The drywell requires cleaning. POND A2,B2,Cl,C2 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. These remaining ponds require sod or hydroseeding and an approved irrigation system with submitted as -built plans as specified in the plan set. The ponds need to be landscaped such that, 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 I rr 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 - 765 -7784 • FAX: 208 - 769 -7277 irr INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Construction Deficiency List - Riverwalk 3rd April 14, 1997 Page 2 when finished, the grate, within the pond, is 0.5' above pond bottom and the flat bottom dimensions match the approved plan set. Please see the attached pond detail. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Street and stop sign installation is required per construction notes 3 and 4. This list of observed deficiencies in project construction is intended to serve as input to help you achieve project acceptance by Spokane County. The absence of constructed items from this list in no way implies that any unlisted item(s) have been approved or are approvable under current County Standards. By copy of this letter, we are notifying the County Engineer's staff that we have requested compliance on the above issues. Please contact us when the above deficiencies have been corrected, so that we ean proceed with the project certification and acceptance by Spokane County in a timely manner. If you have any questions please contact either Bruce Howard or Jerry Peterson. Respectfully Submitted, INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING a John McKervey E.I.T. cc: Ed Parry, Plan Review Engineer, Spokane County Public Works 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 - 765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 1: \DOCUMENTS\ 95618WUHCHLEf. W PD NOTE NOT TO SCALE TOP OF BERM ELEV = TOP OF CURB ELEV. + .20 FT. I pr INLAND PACaIC ENGINEERING 707 Wssi 791 • H,b 200 (50) 409-6840 spoken. 19% 99204 FAIL (SOY) 408-4204 NOTE: ORGANIC CARBON TESTING IS REQUIRED FOR THE TOPSOIL IF THE DRYWELL GRATE IS GREATER THAN 0.5' ABOVE SOD. 1.5" SOD ON TOPSOIL, SOD INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE GRATE ELEVATION PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. SECTIONAL VIEW * IF TWO OR MORE CURB INLETS ARE USED, SET POND BOTTOM WITH RESPECT TO THE LOWEST CURB INLET GUTTER FLOWLINE ELEVATION NORMAL GUTTER LINE TYPICAL "208" POND WITH DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TYPE "B" CURB AND GUTTER 1" MIN. TOPSOIL ON GRADED POND BOTTOM GRADED POND BOTTOM 1.11' -1.41 BELOW GUTTER FLOWLINE GUTTER FLOWLINE ® CURB DROP JUN - 14 - 95 WED 05:15 AP INLAND ASPHALT CO JUN 13 '95 PERMIT JUN 13 1995 INLAND ASPHALT 9PO BOX E 3366 534 -2657 09 SPOKANE DEPT OF BLDG OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W. BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 PHONE (609) 458.3800 TO PERFORM WORK ON COUNTY ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY CO #64331 Permit # 95 - EAB118 WA 99220 993 -0556 The applicant hereby applies for permission to CRUSHED ROCK AND ASPHALT PAVING FOR RIVERWALK PHASE I * * *** *** * * + * * * ** * * ** * * * * ** * * * ** * *,t* * * * *, ** ** * ** *** * * * ** *** *t *** * * * * * *t k APPLICj�...18•A EE T��ppT THE $ N " {pRgV 9TR S E ;�:„ & AddRREE6 a TO H OLD 8pakWE C $ E & kf gp g � a * * SHOULD THE FIN HAR c &' A p D $ y * + + SHOUL + THE FI *tt * + RADE NECi E /TATS CHAN ON 0 ************ t********* * * * +*t * ** ** * * * * * * * * ** * * g ** * * ** * ABP * * * *st + *No cuts on county roads with asphalt leas than 5 years old.* 4 3 / 95 .ea o � a!/v f /o cal 5 fi j L S Date work to start G TUN rk 1 9fl which estimated time re ired for f he above work is 30 days h petitioner ages to prosecute with all dilegqenoe and speed with due regard for the rights, ntereseaa and conveniences of the public. Petitioner further agrees to perform the work in strict compliance with the provlatone enumerated below and stares that h0 has read and will adhere to the general provisions applicable to permits contained On the reverse sido of this form. The undersigned guarantees that if the backtill, street surfacing or improvement fails within two years from the dote of final inspection by Spokane County, he shall pay the cost of the County for making remit or restoratio of n thn rmt d wsv d a r im nrnuamo , t 111 eenoi.ln.n,:..- .. A.a..........a....,i,. a a�� 4y urcaypnvanamatmeuountycis okaneandany cancer or emp thereof sha II ba fluor; k.rndata ay the .pp (Haan% Irani el ry liability ut 1 caponarel f or an accident, loss or carnage to persons or properly, happening or occurring as the proximate result of any of the work undertaken under the terms of this application and the permit or permits Which may be granted in response thereto, and that allofasid liabilities are hereby assumed by the applicant. It is further agreed that if any part of this in lotion Interlaroa with the future use of the highway by the generalpl. i' I'ntbb llSfantov0d aye rocatedasdes sang' eer at the expense of the permlttee or his successor in Intart:.. Z BY It is the responsibility of the app - aifyahwtlltiasan ,r,,..l,elan.n:..... - +. ". 099229144 P.1 ' �raa l tit 61 is_ ip Z .. . 1 . *CiPERMIT Subject to all the terms, conditions; $nil bfovi4i6nb Written or printed below or on any art Of this form. PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED the above applicant to: PERFORM WORK TO COUNTY STANDARDS. APPLICANT I3 AWARE THAT THE STREET PLANS FOR RIVERWALK PHASE I ARE NOT ALIZED AND AGREES TO HOLD SPOKANE COUNTY BAC HARMLCC SS AND ACCEPTS ALL RESPON LITY SHOULD THE FINAL GRADE NECESSITATE KF LL SHALL BE COMPACTED I T I O 9 OF MAXIIMUM D CONT T R T Y L AS E D E TERMDN ED BY WASHI STAN IN FOR R ROAD AND BR I I DGE G CONST RUCTI ON P OR AS DIRECTED BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER. ermi fee $ 10 Inspection fee $ REIMBURSED Total B bona in the amount of $5oo0 issued to INLAND ASPHAL P by CH •h is reg ired to i su re compliance with the above con es t ons said b nd to n fill force an in e for a period o 2 years 0 lowing completion or zed by this permit. P Y permit hall be void unless the work herein contemplated shall have leted be JUL 14 1995 INSPECTION REQUIRED —24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED Call P r it Office 456 -3600 to notify when work begins and schedule Inspection. COUNTY E r�"�• - • DATE 06/13/95 P.O1 bg kept of work been P.t JUN 06 ' 95 09: 36Rrl SPOIL - DEPT OF l3LDG OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W. BROAD PHONE 5 A N NE, WASHINGTON 99260 PERMIT TO PERFORM WORK ON COUNTY ROAD RIGHT -OF -W E� clla UN 06 1995 CAMERON CONTRACTING, INC — 3309 W BISMARK AV 49205 -790 466 The applicant hereby applies for permission to CONSTRUCT CURB AND GUTTER ON INDIANA FOR RIVERWALK PHASE I *No cuts on county roads with asphalt less than 5 years * * * * ** * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * *t * * * * * * ** * ** * * ** * * * * * * * *4 4 * *** * * * * * ** Ap 21,44a . /';yGIC/ Lam`- ..ii —^' /� start J 7 1995 Date wok to s • Thee timated timm reau�efired for completion of the i above work is 30 days egardtforpthetrights, Interests and conveniences otlthenpublic,Spef3d with due Petitioner further agrees to perform the work In strict c with the provisions enumerated below and states that he The has read and will adhe to undersigned guaranies that r 11 the strat surfacing or improv ment fails within h two years from the date final and impPo vrements,IInconside ationofthegrantingofthispermiti1iisagreedby the ppticantthat the untyofSpoka eandany officer or employee thereof shall be saved harm lees by the applicant from an/liability of responsibility for any accident, loss Or damage to pp Icatonrandttheperm itorpermitswhichm ybegrantedInresponsetheretof under the USG of the heebyf assumed PP h gnway by the general public, t must bp removed or relocated as deaigfn this designated by the engineer tth with o of t he perm) tee or his successor In interest. S. W g / i '� 6 — G 95- at 0 Q (/ in - _ ..,. , •, . .-.- ;;$EBMIT Subject to all the terms, condIti•� • Sntip,fAii gnBytrltlen or printed below or on any part of this form. R P t ERMIIS gg SION TO 18 HEREBY diaNTT the above applicant to: FILE IN C OUNTYE NG IN EE R S OFF INSPECTOR TO CK ORMSAPRIORET p pPOU ON THE W% B HO�� pADVANCE NOTICE REQUIRED. FI�p�,¢AgBg 4 C , �Q , CO Tv EBg j D ALL PON9TBni ggggggA r T SINAI, OR1tDE NECES MATE gg'OL PER MUTCD. ALL STREET NY CHANGEB'"ON THE' CURB & G TARTRAgF UT CONSTRUCTED��IN T M PLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN IN_THEVCOUNTYENGI COUNTY COMPACTION 92% MAXIMUM DENSI Y USING UNDER ALL NEW OR REPLACMENT URB AND SIDEWALK. COUNTY APPROVED PLANS JST SE ON THE JOB SITE FOR WORK 0 COMMENCE. A in thelarountpoft CNIERONTCO�NTTR .ACTING, INCd by CH # i ii red to insure compliance with tJe above conditions said bond to be k* in tu force an , n ef for a perio of 2 year following completion of we ay� k orized by t his perms�,, • completedibefoae1Jbe of u51es$ the work herein contemplated shall have been INSPECTION REQUIRED — 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED Call Permit Office 456 -3600 to notify when work begins and schedule inspection. COUNTYE 1NEE `, .a!' /. DATE BY ra.. i/. ??1,I.'i� 11 is the rasp. •✓ till eth::WI f t la notify all utilities and private property Owners whert suchproperty is liable to injury Or to damage thr gn the part an af the above work and the applicant *Hall make all necessary arr angamenit relative CO t ¢ protection of such grope an /Or utilities. Traffic control signing and barricades shall be furnished by Permutes in co nformance with' Manuel on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ". This permit must be available on the work tat and is valid 06/06/95 April 12, 1996 I.P.E. W.O. #95617 & 95618 Dean - Housley Building Corporation 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, WA 98052 ATTN: SUBJECT: Dear Verne: in INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Mr. Verne Jacobsen, Superintendent Construction Deficiency List Riverwalk 2nd & 3rd Addition Spokane County, Washington This letter transmits a list a constructed items for the above referenced residential development that appear to be in non - conformance with approved project plans and specifications and applicable Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. These items must be corrected prior to preparation of project record drawings, and prior to calling for final inspection and approval of the construction by the County Engineer's office. This letter is based on items observed during site visits on 4 and 5 April 1996 (see attached Daily Reports). A representative from our firm has performed 37 site visits on a part -time, as- needed basis from 9/23/95 to present to observe and document construction methods and progress of the work. In addition, our materials testing subcontractor has performed 28 site visits between 9/28/95 and 3/28/96, to observe and test subgrade soils, base course rock and concrete and asphalt placement, to confirm conformance with approved project and Spokane County Plans and Specifications. Due to utility trench excavations immediately adjacent to project curbs, gutters and sidewalks, caving of trench sidewall soils has resulted in undermining of concrete sections in at least 10 locations across the project. The undermined sections must be resupported in a fashion that provides adequate, consistent subgrade support for the improvements. In our experience, backforming of voids and placement of concrete backfill may be a suitable remedial alternative. Attempting to backfill undermined areas with compacted soil will likely not provide satisfactory support, in our opinion. A portion of a drywell barrel was observed in the trench excavation along the south side of Michielli Lane, east of Salmon River Lane. Filter fabric separation between the drainage aggregate and the sandy site soils was not observed during 5 April 1996 site visit. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208 -769 -7277 Construction Deficiency List Riverwalk 2nd & 3rd Addition Page 2 of 2 Concrete curbing along the south side of Indiana Avenue east of Salmon River Lane was observed to have raindrop impressions, which is not in conformance with the County specified broom finish. Surficial spalling of sidewalk concrete was observed along the south side of Indiana Avenue, mainly along the joint separating the sidewalk from the curb, resulting in a finished appearance that is not in conformance with County Standards. Some drainage swales have been disrupted from specified lines and grades, due to nearby excavations for utility installation. Swale irrigation systems did not appear to have yet been installed at the time of our 5 April visit. This letter contains all of the items of which we are currently aware that may result in failure of the project to obtain final acceptance and certification. By a copy of this letter, we are notifying the Spokane County Engineer's staff that we have requested compliance on the above issues. If we do not receive written notice from the County Engineer's office by April 22,1996, of additional items that need to be corrected prior to County approval of construction, we will assume that above list to be complete, and will seek County approval upon satisfactory completion of the above referenced items. We appreciate the opportunity to be of continued service, and look forward to successful completion of construction. If you have any questions, or would like to discuss any of the above mentioned items, please feel free to call me or Bruce Howard at your convenience. Respectfully submitted, INLAND PACIP Jery,-t. Peterson, P.E. Project Engineer Enclosure:Daily Reports 4/4/96, 4/5/96 cc: Spokane County Engineers /Mr. Jim Radke, P.E. a'. \95617 \deficlst wpl NIL:' 199E 15547, nnay23; 1:996 i' PE . Dean HousleyiBuilding -Corporation t6W20 N E 14 trteet R'dt S but? 98052 ATTN: il'Olacpbsen, Superintendent SUBJECT: Dear Verne: This letter transmits a:list of constructed items for the above referenced residential developmentthtitare currently in non - conformance with approved project plans and specifications-and.applicable Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. These items must be corrected prior to submittal of project record drawings, and prior to calling for final inspection and approval of the construction by the County Engineer's office. This letter is based on items observed during a site visit on May 21, 1.9, 9,6 amd,Its limited to areas of the improvements whose adequacy could be vis detegili atahe- tirrip4our visit. ' -1 •:1• ..3.-1 DRAINAGE F OND."S The five stormwater retention/disposal ponds (A2,81,82,C1,C2) have three non - x . r conforming Items;Infcommon: • Pond&bettorns not flat. • Some no landscaping (sod or hydroseed) or irrigation installed. • Irregularly.dimensioned pond bottoms and 3:1 sideslopes not met. POND "A2" I!dLI1I ID pH!_ 1 F 1': ENi, INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. pnitihifibiency List eicw Ikx3rd l ition ti \ epuit Washington ..S,P Grouting of pipe into drywell under sidewalk and in catch basin must be completed. • Drainage structures need to be cleaned of all foreign material. 707 West 7th • Suite 700 Spokane, WA 99204 509-158 -6840 • FAA: 50 - 455 -btta4 2020 L5.e•vo• Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 3314 • 20S- 765.7 • FAX: 206- 765-7277 fi • - 23-15% 15:47 :FILtiNL P1411FIC ENG Riyerwalk 3rdi/ Page 2of3 • Curb inlet structure has negative flow (low point on street side, not on pond side). • Minirnum.pond.bottom dimensions not met (too small). POND 4 131" Curb Inlet,ri )bre,ken and detached from curb (when completed, inlet structures should Eae�#fitxe place). POND "52" " Curb inlet;has negative flow and is not back filled on downstream (pond) side. • Draina$ tructures need to be cleaned of all foreign material. Groutingfaround both ends of pipe, and drainage structure riser rings is 1nsufffele t; POND "CV' Inlet stet cfti e;isfbroken. POND "C2" w • Inlet structureis separated from curb. Form boards around concrete inlet structure must be removed and structure back.filled: Drainage'isttuctures needs to be cleaned of all foreign material. A@DITI @.NALRIIf1EMS F, U • There is:prominent undermining of the curb along most of the south side of Michielli Lane east of Salmon River Lane. The curb has begun separating from the AC pavement along portions of the road. You will submit a plan for review and approval by the Engineer prior to repair of undermined curb, sidewalk and road sections. Ravarwalk 3rdAVition Rage3;of 3 . :.. " SalmonRiverLane is undermined, witl a ) void up to a 4 foot depth measured beneath the PCC pavement at the SE/corner of Michielli and Salmon River Lane Your repair plan is subject to review, nd approval prior to implementation. " There are bird baths along the gutter line around the SW corner of Michielli and Salrnon4Riyer Lane and along the west side of Salmon River Lane. Thereartaftlackhoe outrigger marks in the asphalt that result in a non-conforming he . finish; Tese marks are generally located in front of utility service locations. This list of observed deficiencies in project construction is intended to serve as input to help you achieve:project acceptance by Spokane County. The absence of constructed items from this listin no way implies that any unlisted item(s) have been approved /are approvable undercurrent County Standards. Our preparation of this letter in no way releases the centractor from his responsibility for constructing the improvements per approved projeetplans and specifications, and applicable sections of the current Spokane County:Standards. By a copy of this letter, we are notifying the County Engineer's stafffthat we have requested compliance on the above issues. Please contact us whenithe above deficiencies have been corrected, so that we can proceed with the project :certification and acceptance by Spokane County in a timely manner. ,Respectfulhyr i ted, INLAND PA€,' Jerry E Pet®rts®nSPE. Project Engineer. it �L.I - 1I rn'_1ri L_ CIVi_1 ENGINEERING cc: Bill JohinsCounty Engineer, Spokane County Public Works Ed Pany, Plan Review Spokane County Public Works Jim Radke `Construction Engineer, Spokane County Public Works Terry=Vii 0ot, Chief Inspector, Spokane County Public Works Ed`Dean_ f: ,D"e'anHousley Company F.04 x16561 emsfmsq.wC T i.4 f:,l .08/04/ 10:28 FAX 208 2188 802u DEAN /HOMST Y ILO Dean Mosley Co. 16720N F. 116th St. Redmond, WA 98052 Attention: Vern Dear Vent: Sincerely, OflL Mike Klika President K. C. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 2015 West Dakota Avenue Post Office Dox 1455 ttayden Lake, Idaho 83835.1455 Phone (208) 165.3909 Fax (208) 772.2517 May 31, 1996 Re: Riverway Villa, Second and Third Additions K. C. Construction, Inc. did compact the surface area adjacent to curb and sidewalks in the second and third additions. Utility ditches and areas under curbs /sidewalks were completed by othors. 20d WtJOS:tt 9661 h0 1252£68: 'ON 3NOlid JUN 0 31996 — �y tiwt� � G CC: List INtlais 1p ® 001 X113/Qt11 0!uoseued : N0d3 t - • FRUM : Panasonic TAD/FAX PHONE NO. : 8932521 Jun. 04 1996 01*1 LOH' WAS FAX 150:G594:Z2 He? 30 '96 17:4 C4rAt? Esau iPC. Ofp■■•■••■=0...srerr bit Nttlebe cx 509- o'sr-ta0). .271V-0 .ce. ---gEL-thalaulnarr -1-Caaggir • -- ara---Aglaaatitzt.Cas4 --SILL 60A-Pe Artnrvxf s± itsacrWItth at corticratvelarnstip*stai curbs Gs n.s E Sit ,fidetriUt. csit. ( is (Id a Sn9 - es? - gaol - vat • a q.51t 7-2- oraIA• • December 20, 1995 IPE W.O. #95617, 95618, 95527 Spokane County Utilities Department 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, Wa. 99260 -0710 Attn: Gene Repp Dear Gene: A r . lifigmus INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. RE: Riverwalk 2nd and 3rd Additions, and Sewer Extension from Riverwalk 1st to MH 6G general sewer inspection As per your request, I am writing this letter to confirm the testing procedures for the air, mandrel, and television tests that have completed for the above referenced projects. All inspections records and drawings required are in accordance with the current Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, Section 9.0. Site construction inspections and material testing generally follow the WSDOT Construction Manual (M41 -01), as well as the WSDOT 1994 Standard Specifications for Road. Bridge, and Municipal Construction, Specific procedures for the "Low Pressure Air Test" and "Deflection Test for Flexible Pipe" as outlined in Sections 7- 17.3(4)D and 7- 17.3(4)H were generally followed. 'Television Inspection ", section 7- 17.3(4)I, can not be confirmed as testing was completed by County forces. If you have any further questions or comments, please feel free to call me at our office any time. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. ers" 4 f Bruce A. Howard, E.I.T. Project Manager cc: File Verne Jacobsen Spokane County Engineers Office Ed Parry Et piI\th rxvltinrpocd.b 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 509- 458 -6840 FAX: 509- 458 -6844 -0 AGR Earth &.Environmental E. 520 North Foothills Drive. Suite 600 Spokane. Washington. U.S.A. 99207 CLIENT: 1DEA13 t 11 Pt u05L PROJECT: KL.O. u3ALK oC `' ADD(TIDrJ DENSITY TEST N0. WT. OF WET &CYLNDER WT. OF CYLINDER WT. OF WET SAMPLE VOL OF CYLINDER UNIT WET WEIGHT UNIT DRY WEIGHT MOISTURE DISH NO. WT. OF WET &DISH WT OF DRY &DISH WT. OF WATER WT. OF DISH WT. OF DRY SAMPLE WATER CONTENT% 13o 37- l30 25 y PROCTOR ANALYSIS METHOD USED: ti'ASHTD TI$hTc)ati GEN. SOIL DESCRIPTION (3 m € .50t L a I DE'T T H % PASSING 3/4 MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY 1 OPTIMUM MOISTURE (0•9 % PASSING 3/8 _ REMARKS !.. avatEcT o wtrlx. (DE Ystc _ % PASSIMG 44 SAMPLED BY: 15.9 ex ben._ TESTED BY: C', f' ITCHCfIC IC _ REVIEWED BY: ,� G (2_,A 1 Ilaob.3 (051,0.7 U6 Y5.' ,075 13(0.5 130.1 2 11356.1 (9560.7 4745.4 .075 N 1. 0 (33.x{ //q0(1..8" 65(00.7 4.14. l 675 Nottr /sag 4 11.38"0.7 (05(00.7 (M o .375 (30.7 5 6 2 710.1 ato.1 531. 1 g 1.5 3(.'f 163.9 s'i9. a S.7 iitto 39.E Ilcc -I cp 7. 2- 3 710x 71x.9 468 _ 160.0 5558 V. ■■•••■■•u•uu•••••u• uuu••••••••••••••••••i••w•u•••■ ■■•••■■•■■■■••••••■ ■■ ■••••••••i•••••••••i••••••••■ ■ w■ ■U•w•U•U•i••••••••UU••••••••■ ••••••••••••••••••••■ ■••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ■•••■•■■■■■■•■■••■■ ■■U•••••••••••••••••••••••••••■ ••••••••••••••••a•■ •••w•••••••••••••••••w•••UU••U■ ■■■■• •■■•u• ■■••1..uu••u•■ ■Uu•UUCU•MN MMMM•i••••ww••■ ■ r•■••••••■■•■■•u•■■■ ■U•••••UU••l ■••••• •• •u• m• ■ u••■■ ••■■•••••••UU•t••••••i••••••••■ ■■•••••••• Y.■•••• •w••••••••••••r \•••• ■ ■••••••••■ MMM b‘ ■•••M• ■• ■■••r••U •■ ■■ ■■••••••••U•••• ■ ■ww••••••••w••■■■■■ ■•••••www••U••••••U\ww•w••u•w•■ MMMMMM MMMMMww .wwwi•i•www►111www• •••••••••■•7w•■ ■ ■■aUIUU•••U••w••••••••••••■••••w•••• •• ■••••■i. • ■ ■••••• ■••••••••••••••••ww•••\ \••wwww■ www••• ■■ MINI ■■i wwwwww■■•••••www••••ww•ww ■ ■■• wwwwwwlr, MwN�wwwww�iwwr , wwwi•••••••••r•••iwww��www■ ■ wwwwwwwwr�www��w�wwwiwwwwwwiww�wwwwwwwwwiwwwwr .�ww■ OMMOM• wu u•■• uuu• U• MMII MOOMMONOMMEMM•U•••\uRUUNUI•VlU ■w•••uu•••U••w11111M w••U•w•U••w•••U••••••w•••ww•w• ■ wwwwww /■••• ■uu ■■•■ ■•••wwww••••••••••••••••••••••■ ••••u• ra ••u•••u••uu•• •••••••••••••••f••••••••••••••• • w•• w• w••••• ww•• ww■ ■•••w•www•••w••w•w••w••ww•www•• ■••••u••••a•u••••••• ••••••w••••••••Uu•u•••f•••••U•• ...nI•IMINI .au.u•I•••uuu••U uu flu•flUU•U 5 7 WATER CONTENT - PERCENT PROJECT NO: (x DATE: 9/L019 a LAB NO: (gg 7 1 (50> 140> 130> 120> 110> 100> 80> I�` &l' $. r I ' 80 .. .. .■..■;■.....■..m......■.■aamo ....i�.........>............■. ■ ■■■.■■ ■■■ ■■■■■■. mu.. ■..■.m■■..■.■■.■......■ummun.., a�% .. w mommmmommommimmommammmemommommommammamommommommum ....■..■.■..■■..... M. ....■.nM.........l.n.....■ ■■... s: .+ .*....■ ......... M■. .....■.;....■........... ■....■M Ot, 1 .A.� RtAlR"$YCA` rar . ..... 00RWENWO`MiJ45�, UMMO YR` a�` Mn0`.��`Al EN `3. EOMM`AF` �E` $86@.`[#�Y�RIME' ` a�..: x �r m* n ammxe. a�`.e`S�`F` #S mmv .. . ■■....: ■■■■■ .■.■O■.■....■.M...■■■...M...... , ::' <.. �44.e. ot.■ A .■..■.m 4......■.■ii ■.■.■.■■■1; ■■.■■.■.■M■■.■■■.■.E■■■■■■■■c ■s�■ ai .■.■ ■n..M.u......Mn....■..M........ 111 O ►Ar.4 ■. "... ■■ ......M ■■■■■ .■ ■.■.■■.■.■a■■ .■....■a■.■■.■ a. ■f ��►�• ..■m■■.■.■■■.R .■■ ■...■■O......■■.T.■■■■.■.■R.■.■ � .Ifi` .�► ... ..1.■■.....■N ■o■ou■a■oo■o■laoMMMMman .■ .la, ■ i .rdimpr ■o■oauo.■..■M ■........M..... ■■ ■.;M ■........a .. g ■I" ,r r•SRAM• ...M■■.■. ■... SRkI' �i: 63iNNER$ ig 'ORNM�6FiSA"1Ri5,`ldffiiJ`MPRONMO - MME aVelMY�" W R,Y' .ia ankfl3aa` `ta' L�`r;"od'`'MMt ... .■...■...E■MMUMEM....■ a... ..I MPAWAV .... ■■■..........ii .■...■..■■■■■■...■... ...S ; ,.. ...MA■airA / MI�N ■ ' O MEM ■...■■■.M...■..■■■M mmmm ■. 1M . ■.......... x "MINI .. mil.■.► i .peinnamm.........■..m.■.■■...■ 2 ■...■...■am maw `� ■matimm.►lti.P i .. M► ..... .. R.. ■....M.......■■a RM O MRMMRM a.. WW tlR'+ ;14MMar�`a' . 114W, JQ`Miq;3'. W . M RMRE`MEMO MR6a i�A1`.ZMER.W`MR.Y'i`i•.Ri? I ..■WM. M ° ..■ rs .R a...■ial..Ari..IAUMr ■.. ■.....AM`'■■ ■.... ■.E"■....... ■R ... ,. •" „' ..ffi.■.. ,'r' ■.l.L.�llti.. ... ■........■. ■...■.aR.7....... ■.� • ■...?�.■ .■.■ari..■■. ■ �SRri■ 4�. ■R■..■■■■■■R...■.■■.■u■.■■.■.■■ l ....■.... . : "� a`t.... ..� sm Lr � ... M...■. ...■m,,.`..■..■■■ ■M.■■■.. ■■■i?l mammon ■■....,. M.... /- ..mo.....y. .■.■.. m.........m.■■....■■m.■■.■....R mumumorimummmxamm MM ern mum < MO MEM sSS €„t.?Mi 'gM�a z g .Val ElaEMEMl MMla; laUOMl B aMa Nl ERNME?CEM':`. :M: ■....fail..... .■I»il.. A M.......■. la ■■..■....1.■..... ■.M.■..... ■.M fI ■■■....R■■■■ r ■a■ ■. A. a■.■.■..■. M■■ ■.■.■.■M.■...■..■`a�`■.■■.■■■ ■R ■...a■■.■s. .a urAm ■ Anan .........; u ■■.■.....o..■..■■o■■.......; rr.. R►. i...■ ........... .....■...a4`......■...■......._ Rsaiam``.$x` , t` �AaC`ExO�.m`'M`:a4AasaailrAmo ire;\Y ak`7IKMOMaMIM IMaME. NNMEI a0" M$:i3iM?CAM.Ia`' ` M`'MganiMIRMS M I .u.■ ailm.► 1.omMMMMM ■o■o■■■M.■..■.■■.MO.■o.oAa R IMMIMMOMIKAMMIMAMMIIMMEMEMMEMMIUMMOWAMMOMMEMMMEMMIUMMMEMMEMINIMOMO Cpl aa ►. MOM mm 3M■.■ ■■■■. ■M■.■.■■.. ■M `MNMMM.■■ .R OR..■■IVAIRMW ■OIME■.■..■■■. M...■.■..■ R■..■. ....M.■....■■..f.`',.......O■E A`i ` MaM`aSlRMiOMMa01`aMM \ R�MM. Mt'R?aMAMRa'�l`MME`aNMEM�MMM�3A RM3;:RMM.AMRL.aNRa�Ra4`Ra ".YMO .�£MRl. . emu...■ .■.■■.■.■m■ ■. ■.■.■ ■R w a \■■■..... ■.M ■..■■►. s i.■ m■.■.■..o...■...■. m.■....... R.........R■.■■.■..■M......■■.R .■. d.■.■ M...■..■■. M....■■■.. Q ............. ......R■........;Al`......■..al mullimmommumommmomemmommumomommommommommmoommmemammommmommommamma LP 5 - 130 100 ace: q 110 120 130 Laboratory Maximum Density (PCF) Rock Correction Chart PLUS 3/4 INCH MATERIAL 140 150 Major Divisions Group Symbols (t) Typical Names Field Identification Procedures (excluding particles larger than 75 mm and basing Irections on estimated weights) 2 3 4 5 Coarse gained Sods More than hall of material is Inset than No. 200 (t) 175 vml sieve tile. 'attest Panicle stable to the naked eye. Gravels More than hall of coarse fraction it larger Than No. 4 sieve site. (4.75 mm) , 5 mm may be used at 1 sieve site) Clean Gravels (little or no fines) GW Well.greded gravels. gravel sand mix. turn, little or no fires.` Wide range in pain size and substantial amounts of all intermediate particle tile. GP Poorly graded gravels. gavel -sand mix• turn, little or no (inn. Predominantly one sin or a range of size . with some intermediate sizes mining. Gravels with Fines ( apreciable amount of lines GM Silty grovels, grml and -tilt mixture Nonplutic lines or Jinn with low plasticity (for identification procedurn we ML Word. GC Qayey gravels paveksandtlay mixture. Baltic lion Ile identification procedure see CL below/. Clean Sands (little o no lines) W.R.p$ded sands. revel v sands. little or no fines. Wide range in pain sizes and substantial amounts 01 all intermediate particle tun. SP Poorly graded sands. gravelly sands, little Or no lines. Predominantly one size or a range of sites with some intermediate tint mining. Sands with Fines (appreciable amount of line) SM Silty sands, und'sill mixtures. Nonpintic lint or line with low pinticitY (for identification procedure set MI belovl. SC Clayey sands. sand-clay mixtures. Plastic fines (for identification procedurn see CL below/. Sills and Clays Liquid limit less than 50 Identification Procedure on Fraction Smaller then No. 40 Sieve Size Dry Stnngth (crushing cheracterishnl Dilatancy (reaction to shaking) Toughness (consistency new PL) ML Inorganic silts and very fine ands, rock floor. silty or clayey line sands or clayey sills with slight plasticity. None to slight Quick to slow None CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity. grrvelly clays. candy clays. silty clan. lean clays. Medium to high None slow to very Medium OL Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity. - Slight to medium Slow Slight — 2 2 o c v izA — 1„ MH Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous line sandy or filly wilt, elastic silts Slight to medium Sow to none Slides) to medium CH ' Inorganic clays of high plasticity. fat clays, - High to very high None Hit's OH' Organic clays of nMdium to high plauicily. organic silts Medium to high NOM 10 Very slow Slight 10 nwd Highly Organic Soils Pt Peat and other highly organic soils. - Readily identified by color, Ins It. IM. and Irpwn ly by fibrous texture. AG RA E D_ Environmental Drive, E. 520 North Foothills Suite 600 Spokane, Washington, A. 99207 DATE c ji(fllg5 - LAB NO. 187 ` � PROJECT elope,r'Att ,� ° e3'" PROJECT NO. 1a -1311 SOIL LOCATION a-t 7a 13 lb' Mprt4 n2' CLASSIFICATION SYMBOL: GC Unified Soil Classification System' 1 Boundary Oats h cations 6011. ing characlanshcs of Iwo groups are desIgnale0 by combmel'Ona of group symbols. For crumple: GW.GC. wen graded gravel seno ma.ture with clay bender. - 1 All Wan Ares On this Chart are U 5 Standard After U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station (1960) and Howard (1977). L' ` t o2U NOff h0010tl4 Unve. Jule O . A G R A '' // Earth & Environmental Spokane. wd3 ; 9 1Dn, U.s.A. esz CLIENT -Ark) 7 t1R(a),SLEL1 PROJECT ✓o /�/r7z.cUA �2 ADDtT, MATERIAL DESCRIPTION .u,nUe Snit :QUID LIMIT °M.?' 100 1 • V% N C a • E R 4 R$ Y$ .. o o o d e 0, .. 1 0 .. 30 a n al • so= so 11.1.1• am nom a a , an ii a�na•aa�111�a�a me aum is ma ai % ins r Waal la flall me won nal �•so a on =a ow a an yaw nos ■101 Ina Nen a. an ■Na 11. n • an an an an mom an won No n —n an an 1on --- -n I - fi ilalr laalaa •11•• alll an •aa ii Mal INIMa ITV � :..: :— 1aaNS1111••/ la Main all allIIIIIII la 'flan Mall 1.1a S1111la Ma la 11111111111.1• Mina l II•l1a•a al1111 Illl _ . a Mall 1111111.1•.lallalana OM 1\11a a11\1• -11•• ••1• Ina laallM■IntaIN Milan IMaalIalaalaill all 1• I.111111111111• Ill l•al• 1•alaal •1 INa•a all Sala ELNINIIIIMIaela111111a1 1analaIIIMMIalllanIIII la— allaa 1aaINIIIIIIIIIIII ill lla 111111. Ina - -• Mal i-e N111111. 1 —ate• _a• u• la allIallI1■1=1111flal 1a IflB11••• 1a laaalnla Illallill 1a .IMOSo la anal la Wan la Biala al111111111111111111111a won aansataluanna anariannum la Mann laanallinanfla 1.- 1•� Mae Rana= Na n= • ZE I w 30 20 ID 0 COBBLES 3111 of °Realms In lack.. 0 R 0 GRAVEL SIEVE ANALYSIS 4 n c Ih• GRA M..e., ♦I Mak • U.3. 31ondH�� IN SI N 1 c M.d I... SAND LLIMETERS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS •nlr Esc . YY FINES s 30 SAMPLED BY U. ikeb 2 PROJECT NO. /a -/3!/ DATE 74/95 - LAB NO. '2 7 BARING nlfA GRADATION TEST RESULTS PLASTICITY INDEX TESTED BY W a REVEWED BY DEPTH 2J r3e'tow QCJ4 0201-7 j H ta 11 H . Earth & Environmental E 520 North Foothills Drive. Suite 600 Spokane. Washington. U.S.A. 99207 Client: Project: Al 7 TIAtUStc \ . ZocetoAlt ,Q 1- 3e" Al2'moo Sample Descrip ion: /JAntic Sore /aEp a Sampled by: SIEVE ANALYSIS Date: V4/73 Lab No: a 7 Proj. No.: Method Used: Tested by - /St / Reviewed by: SIEVE SIZE WE(CI RETAINED CUMULATIVE WEIGHT PASSING PA SPEC. REMARKS t It ab1.SS 1 199. l 8a. l SIEVE SIEVE rn ) E a N. b 3. � 7/. �/ OP TOT AL 383,,I 77 53. a sal\\ ?LE wei3Hr OF (03.1 L io9.R (251.1 50 3,5/ 3(04. W.( 34 5 02'0 tbs. tdct5ats Ate ,u 2114\5. 1 (0 457, I D 1 0 9 h . S ao 1 185 .275.0 1 g 40 1a11,.a .2 t la .1 lop Iae2`I.S a33. Ib_o DSO (a35 -3 r02a510 i6.V 100 lack ). 5 aa0, 4/ /6 / goo tabs. V / 9,s.5 /3. 5/ wet Sieve Dry Sieve 0 O ?RIO I a b9. a MOISTURE CONTENT Wet Weight A Dry Weight % Moisture MINUS 200 WASH Dry Weight of Sample 1V(p0.9 Dry Weight after Wash 1 ab4.a m Washing Loss t41 . /a9 [o -aria SAND EQUIVALENT Trial MI - Sand Reading = Clay Reading = S E = Trial !!2 - Sand Reading = Clay Reading = S E = Sand Equivalent = j H ta 11 H . Earth & Environmental E 520 North Foothills Drive. Suite 600 Spokane. Washington. U.S.A. 99207 Client: Project: Al 7 TIAtUStc \ . ZocetoAlt ,Q 1- 3e" Al2'moo Sample Descrip ion: /JAntic Sore /aEp a Sampled by: SIEVE ANALYSIS Date: V4/73 Lab No: a 7 Proj. No.: Method Used: Tested by - /St / Reviewed by: IK/4 Earth & Environmental E 520 North Foothills Drive. Suite 600 Spokane. Washington. U.S.A. 99207 Client: Project: -OM.) * {- IA Rl Jn RJ u Fte wAtl� a � 3 Ritk Sample Descrip ion: LJ.4Trcw / Dt p a 7 Sampled by w• t SIEVE ANALYSIS Date: 74/93 Lab No: /8 7 Proj. No.: 4213/7 Tested by: GCS_ 77{1(456-1c - Method Used: 45TM C /36 Reviewed by SIEVE SIZE R nAINED CUMULATIVE WEIGHT PASSING PA SPEC. REMARKS it 7 7 7 55. 5 - 87. g SIEve TAt i Feow - RITAL a" 14.a_ ply. b4.6 S AMQI£ TAKF11 t ''// 1 (21 a3.6 37.E 35.2 (D.Z SS. 7 5ITE, tt etyTS ARE loi poLsyos. i I a 81, 0 34 " 30. 1r 1 3? . g 57. Wet Sieve 0 Dry Sieve ❑ 1 MOISTURE CONTENT Wct Weigtt Dry Weight % Moisture MINUS 200 WASH Dry Weight of Sample tt 3.a- lbs Dry Weight after Wash Washing Loss SAND EQUIVALENT Trial #I - Sand Reading = Clay Reading = S E = Trial d2 - Sand Reading = Clay Reading = S. E. = Sand Equivalent = IK/4 Earth & Environmental E 520 North Foothills Drive. Suite 600 Spokane. Washington. U.S.A. 99207 Client: Project: -OM.) * {- IA Rl Jn RJ u Fte wAtl� a � 3 Ritk Sample Descrip ion: LJ.4Trcw / Dt p a 7 Sampled by w• t SIEVE ANALYSIS Date: 74/93 Lab No: /8 7 Proj. No.: 4213/7 Tested by: GCS_ 77{1(456-1c - Method Used: 45TM C /36 Reviewed by , � A G R A ' Earth & Environmental :LIENT - qurf-IALAsts IATERIAL DESCRIPTION ,LJgn QUID LIMIT 'COBBLES SAMPLED BY 10•4cbeir._ e GRAVEL Snt C JCL/ /VUI111 rWll'mb ✓ U, JUIIO UW Spokane. Washington, U.S.A. 99207 ro e0 1— r W CO CO CC W Z U IL o. W 20 10 0 Stu d O«nlp. Y Is[I. i n u 0 c SIEVE ANALYSIS c N..S.r .1 Y«. • U.S. llendard HYDROMETER ANALYSIS *telrllu.Y MU . 2 x E R 4 22 2 8 0 0 d ° d o .. O o oa. aana w aaaaaaaalan�aaaaaa aaaa aw 111. • I a�uaa•■a w aaaaaaaala •••.1•021 w aaaa aaaa taa Mani all Ma w aaaan —.laa�aaaaaa w aaaaaaaaISM aaaaa l aaaaaaaalaa�laaaaa aaw aaall aa\1aa�aaa ll• w aaaannwlaa— aaa•an w awa aaaa laa�aalaan w■ �� awan•a•Ian�aaa••a MEM 11111 w MINIM MEIO21- 1lliaaal anak aalla a MIENS Sal a MI 020202 a�a all an Ma 1 MN OE a MIMEO alma a awa�w Non a an min � Ian a � wi a an a n�wMIS a waaaa�laa a�wala•aaaalaa u• •al�iala�aaa�laaaaa��aaaaaaaaaaa�taa•aa�lauaa aw•aaaall._ _ • wool ■■ MIME 11•111111111• aaaa aaaaan aaaaaaa�laa %= • Iaa an= an MIME a -i Ma I•a�aaaaaa Iaa�l•aaaa Iaa�aaaaan 111a�1aaaaa 1•1a�1a1aan Iaa�aaa 1 - 1aa�aaaaaa Iaa� a 111aa1••aa■ a■•••••a■•a�a••a■a •1�••awl•a—aaaaa Iaaaaawaao.alalaaMI laa na�a�aaaaa•n 1aa �aasaa Iaa�aaaaa 1 1aa� aaaaa 1 1aa�aMaaa 1 Ian l aaa•• 1 Ull aaaawaaaawaa■ laaaw�aaaaaa Iaaawaaawaaaa•n Masao= •n •= •••.0202 w�a :aw•aw i ��__ _ awww JO 0 �a•a•I 4 n GRAIN SIZE IN 5.1ILLIMETERS /la. 0 a d0 90 100 PROJECT &v6v vAcx a 3 yEIDD PROJECT NO. 7a -131/ DEPTH 0 .2'60.ou) GRADATION TEST RESULTS PLASTICITY INDEX 020. SAND LAB NO. 1$7 BORING FINES TESTED BYW./ALPE& REVEWED BY DATE ?AD /5"5- Project tuetwALC Sample it Location/Source. /2-, 70 / LT Ro Material Description Lnyr ice Number of Blows Tarc Numbcr Tarc 4- Wet Wt (gm) Tare r Dry Wt. (gm) Tare Wt. (gm) Wt of Water (gin) Dry Wt Soil (gm) Water Content ( %) 50 P L A 40 s T I c I 30 r 0 M 0 E x 10 x s 15 PLASTICITY INDEX TEST DESIGNATION: ASTM 0 4318 0 5 3 e-° Al>o�,;,;0) Depth o2t 20 NUMBER Of BLOWS rrrrrrEEMMOMrMMOMMO t. ir•S36rrLrr 3 annr 7 rrrr'.9tOUM MMrrrr'3Pt IPM u rrr ® r MOM ■rrrrrrr.C®rrrrrrr •T,:rri drrm B ®rrrrrrrrr■ r. rrrrrrnionmerrrrrrrrimesa rr : LBCC:uu::3amanC1mmaa_a DES• ,MMSErm,,,;®F9lL` agemAtuat'maamBrnamsn nmaar ammaaasmvammmanavaawameutsammmannmannuaanamisnawaseaannnanan rrrrrrMMMHO Mrrrrrri199MO WAXIMMEIMMUM .rrrErrrrrrMMMUMrrrrrrrrr anummrm rrrrrrrrr s • Td1113 3. rrrrrrr dMMMMMMZ'rrrrrrrr4,BrrrrrrROS • ttrocr rrrrrrWOMtBrr• IIr=1111WRrUL r rrrrrMMMOa L - il dm ■■ • 1111Ca+ tMMMetarrrrrrMM ArMMMMMMM NPR MMMMrrrrr mosame 63iz,,(m° UNMMriC°OttB DESS P:, ZONCMPUM EMUEEEMMCdCest"MEUREISKIPMMONMEU ED raja 030.0MBE3'.?tUtH33535EE2" 692MEGMOUCEMEIOEBE EEVBMUOSIEUBMRSIMMEEMM ■■ MMMMMML?JESOWIMMULLI.ttMMMrrrrE ®rrr • ^mDr,'±i winnanpeMMrrrrrrBarrrr nMrrMMarnmvaLmnnsumcmrrrrrrrr errrrrlrIIMEMMMMMMMML'CMMrrorrr nonnummnpaaMrrr► /mam ■ MMMM EtMMMMMrrrIMMMMMMMMBBrrrrrrrrr miss — – .n mmr, ■ mumnar© E ■ rrrrrnrrrrrrrramMMMMMMMM rr rrLrr uL, O nr8a MMMMMMMMmaMMMMr rrrOHMMMMrrrrMO MMMMMrrrr rrrrrrPt DU L'Uii ME2MMrrrrrrrr rrrr ■MMMODM■MMMMMM BO6rr■rrrrrr En 10 20 30 40 50 so 70 LIQUID LIMIT COM IMP MM ■Illastinnisivalin Ina MM --- -- =ea --- - — ___t= ®r•-- Q OMB MIN MEN■MISEMEM ON IMIN_■■-- C1:671MIM -- 1— 1I1CIZEOU 111 — r --s —tea Ma= a� YMIN••110. ZaMee NM NMu aMI- -- 11688= IOW lMINIa6MPIII—■ LIU la r— ∎ ∎-- 6I =OM = =MIN ME Sfaaikill �iiirr a11 i—_ - -e®. R6vr11rfE IRCIM IIMMISMEINNee _ate -- -=1159_ MOMS — ____SSBE111111 -- - -- rvl - _ - Uwr1l� Ia�1 ^--- ca®1nnr a� -- •-- 7211rMIMS MIN Maw-- — balms � __— ■-- a®1.1. are—^- - ®—n MM Oil__— — _ - - a -- 61r_ 30 • 00 AGRA Earth &Environmental E 520 North Foothills Drive, Suite 600 Spokane, Washington, U.S.A. 99207 Liquid Limit Plastic Limit 40 90 Project # /a -/31 Date Tested. Via /9s Tested By. W . /-{c cj Fr_ 100 110 120 SUSLMART LIQUID LMn Pu snc LI%n PLASTICITY INDEN NATURAL WC (0/0 as. .' $,I Checked by: . I - GRA . - Earth &:Environmental E. S20 North Foothills Drive, Suite 600 Spokane, Washington, U.S.A. 99207 PROJECT: ,P,116 Lt._ METHOD USED: nwo /raa MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY 13(.t OPTIMUM MOISTURE (Q- 5 pCAISt7 w.1/•ee k coaaae TESTED BY: e • 77 /7dHGOCk REMARKS I mAX Day SAMPLED BY: al /7pt.aE71, DENSITY TEST NO. WT. OF WET &CYLINDER WT. OF CYLINDER WT. OF WET SAMPLE VOL. OF CYLINDER UNIT WET WEIGHT UNIT DRY WEIGHT MOISTURE DISH NO. WT. OF WET &DISH WT OF DRY &DISH WT. OF WATER WT. OF DISH WT. OF DRY SAMPLE WATER CONTENT% 8 ct 0 1 10918,5 loS(GO. 7 4357, S 02 a'S.1 late. O 2 11107.1 (n560.7 eiSc17, I ,07 /33.7 /028. / 3 t /353.7 I 7 41773 .075 1 41 0. 1 131.8 4 1/303, �l !n5/c0.7 g79a.7 07S / 37. c/ /a$, 7 5 6 10(90. c9 w (4.q /S S vSa 3.3 cbo to`18.7 tn5t 021, Ito3.to 4193. to y.q (9. Io51. 31.0 1103.0 '9.3 9 1353. �((_o 159, 5 8.3 l3q l31 tas_ 1R a- PROCTOR ANALYSIS CLIENT: titf1 Al < 4PcLC5L.Ey 02'16 3" /gaamo•us GEN. SOIL DESCRIPTION AJArivt t 22. 9' et? T.. WATER CONTENT - PERCENT PROJECT NO: /a' /3 // 1 DEPTH REVIEWED BY: ru■••••••• I■••••••• ■•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••■ a■•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ■•••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ■•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••1111•••••••••••••••••• ■ ■••••••••••••••I••• 11.11••• ■ I►•••••••••••••••••••••■ ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ■ 0••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••• •■ ••••••••■•••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••• II•••••• ■•••••••••1\••••••••••••••••••■ ■•••••••••••■ 11••••■ ■••••••••••\•••••••••MMMMMl•••■ ■••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••1•••••••••••••••••• ■••••••••••• II•••••■■ •••••••••••\'•••••••••••••••••■ ■■■■••■•••• rI■■■•■■■ ■■ ■■■■ ■■■■ ■■■a•■■■■ ■■•■■ ■ ■■■ ■■■ ■••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ■••••••••//••••••••■ ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••■ ■••••••••' I••••••••• ■••••••••••••••11••••••••••••••■ 11 11.��11� IIMMIIIIMI MIII IMIIII � IIIM MIN ••••••• a••••••••••■ ■•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ■••••■ n•■•••••••■•■ ■..U .•■■■••••■■••■•• ■••••■■•• ■• ••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• /0 DATE: R I (o ITT LAB NO: IS(k % PASSING 3/4 % PASSING 3/8 % PASSIMG t4 Iz s. h _150> 140> 130> 120> 110 100> 80 wommammammummassommmannammmurnommammassumummEnsummomminomman iii minis i....... .m.........m....iiiii iiiiiiii iii� r ■■■■.■. ■r .■ MILIi�■a■. ■... ■. ■ ■1MIM■ ■ ■.■.■.■.E■■■ ■■■MIMMII # MEM ■■■■■_ C■■I LIM■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■_■■■.■n■■■■. • a. ■ ..a a ..aa....a.■.1a.■■.aa.a.a■■... a..s.a.a.a ■■ C■ C■.■■■■........a■■ ..■....a■■.•■n■•■•■■.■■.■. ■■■■■ ONMOMEEMemmilninminimilmimmimmonneminumMEMM ■■■■■■.■■■■•..■■.■ ■ ■..■■■. ■■■■■■■■■■ ■•■■•■■■■■■ ,02222■ asasaas�aaaaaaa; al a;rasa; l arama;amasamsa22says >: ■•■•■_ . .■••a.■•■•••••a.•.•■■•■•••••••• a...a ...as■a...a.fs■.■.■a.a. .■.■ mommummummummommumaNammummemm I••N• ■:: •UUUUU■U UU•IUU•UU :C:U :•■ ■ aa.■..aaw...a■■a■as■.■..■...a■. 0•111••••••••••11110•11121M11•11•••• 22222222222222222222222222222 .. .■■....- ........ -..... _a.aa..a.aw ■.■•■•..•••••..•.••••• ■a aaaaaaaaa■.■■■aaaaa ■■■■■..■■■■■■■■■.■ ■.aa..aaa®..aa■.a ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ a.a...aa. ■■.. 110•11•1111116• 222222222 EMI . ..■ • 80 Am F . d ■■■. ■w 4 r' ■■■■■■s s- assaasslg vardvimummomm Swum mummommilm . i .�u f a +t4 ■! x �► a.a3aaaa■.aa. m. .+n ■..■.■■■.■■■■■■ ■......s.■..■nna s .W' aRwr;aassasaw>;assaas tirkiarainirrnannantMin mingmammrAmmumilammummommmimmins ■■.S■ IUP s■.■.■■■.. t■■■■■.■■■. .air.+ ■ ■ aawa■.a.■■aas ■ .,.. IV ■■ ■. ■■ ■. ■..■..■■. ■....N IIWAIMPlaralarAMEWIMMMENIMMIMME MmapulmmuUmmandimmemminOMMEMMEMmemommo r ■.■ luTat.► .■■■.■■.■■■.■.■..s■■■...■■■o astr mE saw wa>, 2 221■ramwas' wlasswssasssassaa sew ■MPA .1■./a�1. 1 ■ ■.■■... INIM .. ■■.■ ■■■■ ■■a.■. ■anp�F+f1■.a ��y■■`,�n► w......a.■..■.anane.a.■■aa.ns •• E■►ai■ ■.■.. ■I.. ..■..■■■■■a■■■■.■■■ ■a■..■■■. ■■ :I�J MOMMEMMEMOOMMEMEMINOMMEMMUMMIM M.rir■ llIMEii■■a ■a ■■ ■.■..■.■■■..■■■. ■...........■■o ■.a■ .2■apa■■ er i m ■..■ seas ■■.aaaasaa.aaaaaaa■..aa..a■ .■■■.,,�.. 1.■.y Ma...... . ■ ■. ■.... ■a.. ■.■....:.........a a ■a.a ■� .■ ■■■i .. a.■nnom■....a. ammo .aa.aC:ta...■a.s . aI..aa sts €. a .• . • a.■■.■aa. a. ■ ■a.■a.saa.a ■.was. % mine ••...aF •.aimria.■ .. . ■......■. s.a.......s...a.aa.aa..ai.■...a . .MMIKSO■... ..■►r.■ . ra m■.■.■■.■ .■.■..■...a..■.....■M....■a..■. ■..■.. ais...■ ri aa. s .■ i.■ ■. a..■. a. w ■...■.■..w■■.a■■a■■ava.a.■a■a.s ■f■■ .r■a■■fii■■■ aa:■ . r■■■■■■■■■■■ ■. ■■■■■■■■■.■■■ ■■■■■■ N ■■■■■■■■■ ■a■. a...■4'" i■. aa as s..■■■. a. aa■■■■■■..2■a.■.■aa■a.■a.aa.■< ..a : .■.■.4.� &.y ..■■.a■.■..■.■■ ■■■■■■.■.m■.■■..... ......■.■o ■■■�" a.aa.naf.a■.malaaa► ■■. mm a■ a■■ a■ a■m■■.■.■■..w.■.■.anama■.■.■.■. PAUSIMMElpint ia■.. an .a.■. aria. a■■■. a. 2 ...■■■■..saa.■.■■■acsa■■■.a.■.a . awwa a N. .MEt a.a�`wa.saa.M``Mawr 2EM2a.E.��i.AE. wa.�sasa.saaa�a\•�aaa. a■.� 7Z7.► mass. aaa.. ■■.■. a. wa ■ ■ ■■■ ■.a\aa.■ . aa.a .`■■a ■.aaaa2 ■.■fit i.■■a■ ■uUWAIa.■■.■.■a■S■■.■■■■■..■■ MUMI ..■■■■■■■...■■■■.■.■. a■aati■aa.s►Arita e seas. a■ a. a aM■ aa.■ a■ a. s. aa■■.a.■s■ara.aaa■ 14■■ .■.■ .0 .a► ■aa......■.■ ■■.■ ..■.■ ■ ■.. ■... ■2..■...... ..■.■■■ .ia■a.aa.s.a.a► aaaa■ N, a aaaa■.■aa;a..■■aaa■ a v i•••••11.1.N■.■► IMUM IIII ...■..■■ ■MINIM ■■■■;1■■■■..■.ev.■..■■..■ aratr■w■a► .■.■pz ■..?V •2G]•.a■..■■■■■■ i.■.■.■ ■■■2 ■.■■.■.. ■■■■.■...■.■aa..■■■ . 9.Wa. r aaa■ ► aa■■a a. a. a.aa■■ a. aaa■.aa■ a. a.aa.■.■.aaaa.a■a.aaaa..aaaaaas Qi`O .7`7`'.aMP Q.WWIN.M'B"aa. `�Q�4aMOOM.a.MM ' v . v a a a. aaa2i�3`�Z`aa AIM ■ I.>�.a.a ' aa■ aaaa. 212 ■as ■.aa....aaaaaaas.a.a.. ■. ■;.a � a" 4.■■■ .■■■.■■.. a ■■.■■■...■ a.■■■■■.■■ a■.■■■■■■..■■■.■■.■■a.■..■.■.■. •••••s m• .■.■a► .■-..■...... a......■ ............ ..■..■■■■■- ■......■.a....■.■.■. MEMM aaaaaa2 M aapl a. a.■ 2 . a. ana.. raa....■ aaaa■■.a■ ■a.w. ■ ■.■ ■a..w.a■a.an. 7.■■.a.a.a ■a ■■2 ■.i- aaaa ■■■■■ ..i2ii sw• W■■..• MEMO MIIMMOMEM .■■.■..■. ....mum ■■ 1•l • ■ • a.. L$b pare q 100 IT 110 120 Laboratory Maximum Density (PCF) Rock Correction Chart PLUS 3/4 INCH MATERIAL 130 T 140 150 Major Divisions Group Symbols Ill Typical Names Field Identification Procedure (excluding particles larger than 75 mm and being fractiooe on estimated weight.) 7 7 4 5 Coarse grained Soils More than hall of material i1 later than No. 70014) 175 pm) sieve site. 'attest panicle visible to the naked eye. Gravels More than hall of coarse fraction is larger than No. 4 sieve site. (4.75 mml , 5 mm may De used as (sieve site) Clean Gravels Witte or no )inn) GN , WNI. graded gravels. grovel sand mix• turn, Ii111a or no fine. Wide range in pain sizes and wbstantial amounts of all intermediate particle size& GP Poorly graded gravels. gravel.saM turn, hills Or no fin*& one size Predominantly o size or a range oI sizes with some intermediate size& milling. Gravels with Finn (appreciable amount of )inn GM Silty gravIL grareLUM-sitt mixture& Non/Arctic lion or lines with low plasskiry (for identification procedures set ML Mimi. Clayey gr +y.l& gra rNsandclay mixtures. Plastic 'inn (for identification procedure see CL below). Pseud ou o a111!l) spurs veal) Weltgraded sands, gravelly sand. little or no lints. • Wide range in pain slzn and wbstantial amounts of all intermediate particle site SP Poorly graded sand, gravelly sands, (idle or no lines. Predominantly one size or • range of sites with some inlarmediste tizn missing. (tau!' to )u notue e17naa)dde) s +ul3 1I!M spurs SM Silty sand, sand -silt mixture. Nonpintic fines or lines with low plasticity (for idtntilication procedurn sae ML below). 8 Clayey sands, sandolay mixtures. Plastic fines I for identification procedures se CL below'. Silts and Clays Liquid limit less than 50 Identification Procedures on Fraction Smaller than No. 40 Sieve Size Dry Strength (crushing characteristics) Dilesancy (reaction 10 shaking) Toughnesi konsistnKy new PU ML Inorganic silts and my lire sand. rock flour, silty Or clayey fine sand or clayey tilts with slight pintkiry. None t0 slight Ouick to glow None CL Inorganic clay* of law to medium plasticity, avell clays, sand pl Y. gr Y Y Y clays. silty clays, lean clays. Medium t0 high None to very don Medium DL Organic silts and organic silty clays of planikity. - 51403t to medium Slow Slight S c Uo '= 2 .� b s. MH Inorganic silts, micaceous Or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils. Nntic silts. yighl to medNm Slow to noel Slight to medium 01 InOrganiC clays of high plasticity. tat clays High to very high None Hi ges 011 H Organic <ISYt of medium to high plasticity, organ s Medium l0 high None Its very slow Slight So n madlum Highly Organic Soils P1 Pen and other highly organic soils. R<edily idemil'ed by color, orlon, sponpv S. and Irpuen ly by fibrous le ture. � AGRA o a-_..t___- ,ental Drive; E. 50 North Foothills Suite 600 Spokane, Washington, A. 99207 DATE g I ( I -36 LAB NO. its CLIENT ! cat-5 140.5sLe: PROJECT eA0tL S- a'''. 3 PROJECT NO. (a,-i 3 t I 1+Sa @ o pr+ 1' CLASSIFICATION SYMBOL: 1 C Unified Soil Classification System* t Boundary classd 10es. PO vp characlenshcs of Iwo groups arts designated by combmabons 01 group symbols. For *sample: GW -GC, welhgratled gravel sand mvlure wmh Clay bander. 1 All sieve Saes on Inn cn•rt ere U S Ssandard After U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station (1960) and Howard (1977). Protect e0„AI Y Sample it Location /Sources S7M 19+ So E" Material Descnption A %ATrc,E Number of Blows Tarc Number Tarc 4 Wet WI (gm) Tare 4- Dry Wt. (gm) Tare Wt. (gin) Wt of Water (gin) Dry Wt Soil (gm) Water Content ( %) 5o P L A rA s c r Y N 20 O x I0 >7 15 PLASTICITY INDEX TEST DESIGNATION: ASTM D 4318 t.DDtrltD.) Depth 2 r MMMMMMRrr la••••Hrrt7% AWESOME. trrr ■R 11EZM iM MMMM M®5RRR RARrRBIZIMMMRRRR Irrrri RRRrC9[4]IRRRRRRR;: RRI. ■OrrrrOCBrrruO.EG: 1111111 M M Rr r a ■rrrrrrrr6®r•R•rrrr'uQr9 rrmrrr6��rrrrrrr ®rrrrrrrrrr RrrrrrrrrB®rrrrrrr■W`r:% aut t a :e. :Itlid d® itve.m /eiW wslarmcrou n E 3@@ MM M MMMM 3 e. U 3 u @` 111OMME.MM BB r4•000 'wIGRrR 1111rG r •I MM M MMMMMMWM= rrr• ■ rrrr■ rrrBrrrrrrriSB.?rtEk2rrrr .er &rrrrrrrrrrfPrrrrrr!♦ •IrLit:r■ �@ rrrrGQrrM mErrrrr.iIR3 Crr ►RRRRUGCUUrrrrta@■Rrrr rr rrrr ■rru @rrrVir11r9031rrrrrrrFZpL ■■r t " r ®rrLRrrtllrR1'1.'rR RV rr r�LE ■rrrrr6BrrrrrrrRrtlrrrrrrr MMMMM M ■rrrRrrrr ®rt.Rrrrt•�5 • 111E E rRrr►rrrBBrrrr ISERIM MMMMMMM MUM /Me RSE 'REO SU I T E EMI Z II ®^ wwest6Q tx EEM Nen tni 2051 ®E.S.BCGCB @®1 N e @ ell ED r3!:a E9? reLIEN r 411 11 1 11lIP�' mS� MMM MMSIMMIIMP B @ ®6eu8�II3BB9i4Bf861W61�B LJ1=r4rrr11 ® ® ■r • T rrr1 rG r rrrr r � %rr 7 %►'i'r ■ ■1 ' IN SrrrrrrrC U ■ BE _ _ 1r�s =r ; ®rrrrRrrr�s$rraarrrrarrr : :t11ltp n , � r.1�r i� :=. r© ■ rrrr ■ rrrrmuMMMMrrrr @ffirrrrrrrr8@rrrrrrrrr r4 USEEEEMMEM MM MMMMI ES MMrrrrrrBEEMENnrr� Liquid Limi 30 S a /.2 ".3 /8.3 /9.0 /0.9 /D.W a.9 3.3 10 20 30 40 50 50 70 LIQUTO LIMIT 20 NUMBER Or BLOWS 30 AGRA Earth & Environmental E 520 North Foothills Drive. Suite 600 Spokane. Washington. USA. 99207 so 1111_ —_ -- _— Q ®•t -. . •11 —a_— _--- r•t ®r 11 NM _^•__ =16a --- . 111 M— in Maga MI WI im �rt.�— �• um= ttrtrtrco- -.. n1 ■����� 1=1•1■ =�cyevW�.. �t-- � 111.� Iwt¢ =ea--. •111 —t— fit.— .�10.111==e1•r1•. 111 �� —•� — -s IMEW= MO. 111 1111.1. t� 1��cc.7 um . cS clam a. 1 rya_— tt� ��'�:• t8 flI IN. t011•■•t1 ^e•1∎511 MI SIM tomil ∎WMB» 1111► f• — 1n111111- -ICS R\ Bed.'• — 4 —__— _Tau M1 MI — S ^. Mi1� 13Y101•i. •WIIIWein1 -- --- _. MM —ms - 111•te•OIDa V.. OI — � •�•• ∎ —® ®1.1•111 — tttw Milne 1M=Mon I•1 01111111M■=111111•fl• MI WEI MOM= NM MM 11 11111111M — NM= _IMF —Ctt•r MINIM — ttttrttMIMIN=1.11m ®r1fl �.-- 111111111_1�1• r_sm a_. 1•u !! t-- _1•r_— ___t.� i• t 11 40 W Project d Lab >~ /a -/ /g Date Tested ce i cii5 Tested By LJ.t4ot_Dttt_ 100 110 120 St.PQiARY: LIQUID Lein Ptwsnr. LrMrr PLASTICITY INDEX NAiloyLWC (°o) 37. a7 ES T - 3 Chocked by Plastic Limit i Earth & Environmental E 520 Noah Foothills Drive, Suite 600 Spokane. Washington, U.S.A. 99207 Client: 77)€ a l £ ttAtilSL Project: 2loon.t)PLt. „ Anmmnta Sample Description: MJAin)E &It. Dram 1` Sampled by: 1 c.4e. SIEVE ANALYSIS Date: ct I6 1q,S Lab No: Proj. No.: 4s -/31/ Tested by 1°J 41 Uhr:72; Method Used: Ci36 Reviewed by • 73 1 •CUMULATIVE SIEVE SIZE WEIGIU' RETAINED WEIGHT INC PERCENT PASSING SPEC. REMARKS 02 ,, a- O d VS, O VS, Na slam ?Ate / tom la 5, l 4 /3,5 - , 70,V q U Q 2 5 F3.1 l T077?1_ 127E ?777 6F 4,4,k,cte. U etykrs "Jet 3/ II S. �. /Ai ?c3c.WbS, /GO'?0 ?clSSEO 3 r ive-oe - �. Wa sieve ❑ Dry Sieve ❑ MOISTURE CONTENT Wet Weight Dry Weight % Moisture MINUS 200 WASH Dry Weight of Sample 4811. 165 Dry Weight after Wash Washing Loss SAND EQUIVALENT Trial Nt - Sand Reading = Clay Reading = S. E. = Trial #2 - Sand Reading = Clay Reading = S. E. _ Sand Equivalent = i Earth & Environmental E 520 Noah Foothills Drive, Suite 600 Spokane. Washington, U.S.A. 99207 Client: 77)€ a l £ ttAtilSL Project: 2loon.t)PLt. „ Anmmnta Sample Description: MJAin)E &It. Dram 1` Sampled by: 1 c.4e. SIEVE ANALYSIS Date: ct I6 1q,S Lab No: Proj. No.: 4s -/31/ Tested by 1°J 41 Uhr:72; Method Used: Ci36 Reviewed by • 73 of H sa tit H Earth & Environmental - E 520 North Foothills Drive. Sure 600 Spokane, Washington. U.S.A. 99207 t-. EAt) 5 11141a 1S CFcf Project: M11n'/I,44 r. ,2 " 3 4N)i7iolu Client: Sample Description: ,ugru( beb7N 1 Sampled by: g-/- b'C tt lz SIEVE ANALYSIS Date: 9 4 AT Lab No: Proj. No.: 42-/3/ Method Used: Tested by: a' Aecbe&. Reviewed by- SIEVE SIZE WEIGHT RETAINED CUMULATIVE WEIGIrr PASSING PERCENT PASSING SPEC. REMARKS I A. ta3.5 R%7.l $ 3' /E7JE /5 T.00E.v peaty) T 'I6 a38, 3 -7 ,3 ib.'� mr RFMAINtuc, poailou of ToTAI SRMp LO EigHT I. Al /l WS .0 sSa 57, G. 53S. (D- 73 4 77, 0 or 40, ynAr cc] 6 c a r , 7 3(a1 ' 025el.7 35,F( %� „ slur. {_Ole l?s 10 755.9 o lite IN MS a 90 a0a, n20.1 7e. go 1314K, 0 a - - l fl, a / � 'EA GO 3 . gb 7'027.5 1 8 3.1 I4, I l 00 $31.-7 / 7T.1 / 1 111111111111111,1111 55, b 0 wd sieve 14 Dry Sieve ❑ MOISTURE CONTENT Wd Weigle 102q,$ Dry Wcight % Moisture MINUS 200 WASH Dry Weight of Sample / I Dry Weight after Wash 7 lid D Washing Loss /V?-4 /y K 7. _, SAND EQUIVALENT Trial N1 - Sand Reading = Clay Reading = S. E. = Trial #2 - Sand Reading = Clay Reading = S. E. = Sand Equivalent = of H sa tit H Earth & Environmental - E 520 North Foothills Drive. Sure 600 Spokane, Washington. U.S.A. 99207 t-. EAt) 5 11141a 1S CFcf Project: M11n'/I,44 r. ,2 " 3 4N)i7iolu Client: Sample Description: ,ugru( beb7N 1 Sampled by: g-/- b'C tt lz SIEVE ANALYSIS Date: 9 4 AT Lab No: Proj. No.: 42-/3/ Method Used: Tested by: a' Aecbe&. Reviewed by- �/ E 520 North Foothilnve, Suite 600 .� A G R A /I E I arth &'Envlronmentaf 'Spokane. W ashington. ls D U.S.A. 99207 CLIENT 'w,e.I q C7p)w5l.Et PROJECT,I@1, wq4.L 02'" A AA.:'O ROJECT NO. 7L-73// DATE 9I(49) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION AJA &)IC :QUID LIMIT 3g SAMPLED BY 20_,44CDC-72_ DEPTH GRADATION TEST RESULTS PLASTICITY INDEX 27 SIEVE ANALYSIS 104 S _ 5 t5 2 2 S S2 Y$ E 0$ o d W so 30 2 0 w 0 Slio OWndpo In Inches Noah. of Yea • U.$.Slon /onl ro-- 11 •l•1_11■ 111111 iai■i\nasia■ ■n■ns MIME IIIIMSMINNIIIIIIIIIM no \ ■� ■■ ■..Y iai■i\■. limn Malin la ■■■■n Mao an Mon Ilallalaa iii1 111 ItlfIII alliaMIlla a B■■dal Nana in MlaIllaillI Immo la alai EMI III 111II11 I♦ 11 1 IIIIIIIS nal I an ion. Li Illt Val min NOM Milla Van : !alai a ■■■ la Maga la San 11111a■Maannsallal Sala Mania= an Allan Mala la allflaall MEla ala —iii i ■�\■- I�■i■■■___ Ma Ina Man la laa ninaina la= U Nana 1111111SalaMMENall Mai ■ \� M ain �\■�e■■■i ■/ aanassinmesson Mai • • COBBLES Mal allIE ilk Mt— ini■i\■���■■■an IN - ` 11 • 111 Palalelinali 2111115 Ma= nal Nan . MI r isi�Y�t■��i�i■■■an moms Ina im mom. mlall111111=1111111 Ma MNIMIN • i•i ■iIllal ■I Mi ii•iiai■ I■a111 a aillaala �■■■MI I ■■,t � �il I• I ■iM�ll■■■ a 111■ ■■■ •11111I1=I1•111■■IM■■■■Ill ■ ■■OBI• co, R 12 ^ .1 c.IILLIMETERS c So c /In. GRAVEL GRA IN SI ZE IN c Sloe SAND en A En la' kill HYDROMETER ANALYSIS ID 0 10 100 FINES TESTED BY GC,. ryocdEJZ. REVEWED BY LAB NO. /R',5 BORING ,_S /o-1 PROJECT NAME CI L * 3 tub 7 n C t UtThz4.4 At_r__ or c At.* .71 A 0 PROJECT No. 102 11 FIELD REIN& No. /.., LOCATION DATE / iol.,240:5— PAGE 2 SCu-fll PERMIT NUMBER OF cs WEATHER &OW" CLIENT OR OWNQ 1 44 A.)5C-0.j ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR CeivAseti I.) ARCHITECT :: . ,..... :: . • „:;- -k-t,..t,; ..lic.,.% "..{ . ( ASgiON t i4 f irigi t t et trig t.s 4PECIFIC s j a c9CATI , , 9 , N . _ ,,, A i i :, itlf ,,,, c:: .,,..... ; , :::) ,, t ,,,, ,., , .• „ . , GRIDS '5 -c„) ft. ILI SCu-fll .,4 A A tiC TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED a CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F,) 0. 6:2 oi TIME 5 ': V6 AIR TEMP. IEMARKS CONTINUED a,„ c . Mc •••,, - - ''''"*'•::ttMe.21:02 ' ' -, lei itk SUPPLIER Ac mixt -2 Ter 6 MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. 01 SLUMP (IN.) i • AIR CONTENT DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) 300C) No. OF SAMPLES .3 TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED a CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F,) 0. 6:2 oi TIME 5 ': V6 AIR TEMP. 45? • i . - "I.: a v ' 1". " 1 . " 1 .,..,. - • -4,: gy; SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME MR TEMP. .., , , -ft' l'r •atnirfal:7,7r.""'''''''''''tiZgirtZtr"C"; fefar ,,, P . '" trAVIORT 1... ,„%,r, I:it; TYPE OF IAORTAR MATERIAL TEST REPORT No SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED MORTAR TEMP. (Deg 1'.) TIME AIR TEMP ,,mi;wiA,- AtLagnis riat ;.8 - 15 1 a r a WEJIEIN L ,I A ILDIAPAPEentnifitENT • e- • le i • _ , V * ^e YES NO IF NO, EXPLAIN AG RA rth & Environmental RESTEEL 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 REINFORCED MASONRY SHOTCRETE OTHER (Specify) 0-0 0 STRUCTURAL STEEL FABRICATION 0 STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION 0 EXPANSION BOLTS DARE PROOFING ; • , roorms 9 AUGER CAST PILING 9 GRADE BEAMS 0 WALLS X OTHER (Specify) CAle 0 COLUMNS 0 SLAB-ON-GRADE 0 STRUCTURAL GRADE 9 POST TENSIONED SLAB Inspector 4. ft# 1 g115/ AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc, (Rev. 1194) D ate MATERIAL FIELD REPORT G R A in & Environmental ifief Ro jEcr AME etiwye.,,, (-7 ) 3 9149 LOCATION CLIENT OR OWUER ofr-ti J.) f GENERAL CONTRACTOR CAnine_cti PROJECT No. DATE PEFIMIT NUMBER TEST REPORT No. og) PAGE OF WEATHER OLOLLAC) ENGINEER ARCHITECT . fiVs: .14:St •""tititk ELD D TA ; .,- SUPPLIER tems? I MIX No. 790 I PLANT No. . CONCRETE 0 GROUT 9 MORTAR 0 FLEX BEAMS 0 PRISMS 9 GROUTED LI UNGROIJTED OTHER o FC011NGS g WALLS a COLUMNS 9 GRADE BEAMS 9 SLAB/DECK sue 0 PILINGS OTHER INSPECTOR /A ,4 DATE SPECIMANS CAST Reviewed by TIME £ TRUCK No. aa TICKET No. €4207.39 % AIR .54 SLUMP TEMP. Deg. F) GONG 62,3' AIR di0 DASNIT WEIGHT DESIGN STRENGTH 30 SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS . 1 PSI 0 0 2 b DAYS TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED YDS AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS LOAD SIZE /Q yos GRIDS I OweRs caizzs ON D3DI RNA PAW oirsuot.).) ensr i4-013 L.0eAr. Ake-rt+ f .So t43 SIDES rP PO40 REMARKS I REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. LAB ID No c AREA (SO IN) clA AARKS TEST DATE .R7 Itt(7 I t 7 FIELD CURE AGE (DAYS) 7 02_5 WEIGHT (1_13S) MAX LOAD (L85) /70 n 0 / q STRENGTH (P51) 372 570f, 5 SET No. LAB TECH C r i•J c AGRA Earth a Environmental. Inc. (Rex. 11/94) REVIEWED BY I tABORATORY DATA •' . DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED adk Date 4)47 1 ti 1 MATERIAL TEST REPORT 140poFrthiliack aatA CEMENT TYPE 0 DESIGN MIX No. GEM LBS. F ASH LBS. C AGG LISS. C AGO LBS. C AGG LBS. SAND LBS. H2O LBS. 9 ACTUAL ADMIXTURES AIR ENT I OZ/CWT WATER ADDED BT I LBS.I AT I LBS. ALL RENS INSPECTED ARE: 0 CONFORMING 0 NON-CONFORMING TEST METHOD RASTM C 39 AASHTO T22 9 OTHER (Specify) COMPRESSIVE 9 FLEXURAL 0 CONFORMING 0 NON-CONFORMING SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS • VARIATION FIELD FROM DISTANCE DRY FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS TEST ELEV. BELOW MAIL DENSfY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. METHOD LOCATION (FEET) GRADE TYPE (PCF) ( %) ( %) ( %) FAIL / iv ... ein Ate .• . e l t o n f So•IN,,., Q,,. -la • Nmdn.p !3 /d O t 1 „ " II J Qe T -fa 3 so..44„ 's.O ,L 11 ?� i. q,'/ lion / S/ =7c 9 1P T � ,b 100 ^ < //._/ P I 3 LL 11 1, } � , ,V�r �o , @Shnl'o I� .� N, l7� PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON: SPECIFICATION: ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 . 90% D 698 ❑ 95% D 698 ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 ❑ 90%13 1557 ❑ 90%0 1557 ❑ OTHER ❑ OTHER T TNUMBER DT DENSITY TEST RT = RETEST TEST METHOD MATERIAL REFERENCE _ MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) J. `j• I [� 18 b . k 1 Sn) / % ,33, 2 / ___9' NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC= DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) AGRA E &E Field Rep. (Initials) AGRA E &E Project Manager (Initials) Contractors Rep. ❑ (Initials) Continued PROJECT NAM K. 1 0erwa Lk 4- 3 ° PROJECT No. /— 13 // DATE /0 — 'R < FIELD REPORT PAGE No. / 4, '70P"R AG R A rth & Environmental DAILY FIELD REPORT Earth tlEnyli, onmental E.'520 NodN.FO thins Drive, Suite 600 Spokane, Washington, U.S.A. 99207 PROJECT: I I era Li.) P1 PROCTOR ANALYSIS WENT: A It A tJ tt - 4l)S PROJECT NO: /O? /377 DATE: / 74.5 LAB NO:. OS METHOD USED:. DI55 InAET C GEN. SOIL DESCRIPTION aA COLUZa MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY /387 OPTIMUM MOISTURE lo .7 REMARKS SAMPLED BY: IPOI D P.SP4 TESTED BY: ('r 'Pr tirmcACt` % PASSING 3/4 % PASSING 3/8 SIMG #4 c REVIEWED BY: DENSITY TEST NO. WT. OF WET&CYLJDER WT. OF CYLINDER WT. OF WET SAMPLE VOL. OF CYLINDER UNIT WET WEIaIT UNIT DRY WEIGHT MOISTURE DISH NO. WT. OF WET&DISH WT OF ORY&DISH WT. OF WATER WT. OF DISH � T. OF DRY SAMPLE ATER CONTENT% w 3 0 1 /1/33.5 1s9. a 4/62 3 3)5 /35.9 2 / /32/.5 6559• a vz6a. 3 a�S /39.9 /33.z 3 1/561 -49 ( a 3605 WS /5/7./ /38', 4 / /,Q/.5/ 4)55%2 .325 5 6 c63 SY?. /6. /b 7 Y. a / ss-V, SGY.G 07o. 0 /66. 9) Y03.7 o 02 62027. o 027. r /103. (a 936 6.3 C o G78'. R co Yd. / OK / /. / v77.o S• (31 13'/ (31- MMMMMM e11.11a1111eee• eeee ••••e••••ee•••••••ee•e•••ee•■ ■11e•e•••111111e11•ee••••eee•e■ eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee■ ■••••■1111.11 eeee•• •• ■■e•ee•••11e•e11••eeeesee•MMMMM •■ ■u•••••un••e••••ene11• " euu•m•• •ue••••n•u ■■• ■■•■■•■■■■•■eea11.11•<®ee••1111MM • e•••11eee11ee•••■ ••e•e•■■•ee•111111.11e11M211 •11•see••51•••e•eeeeeee••e MMMMMM M MMMMM•e11■ ■1101ee•ee•MMMMMMMM ■e■ ■MMMMM 1111• eeeeeraeeeeee •••eeeee11•�ee•ee•e■•ee•■ ■1111■■••■ eeee■• 1111■ ri• •e■■..••.•e.....•.►••..•...••.. ■eee■e• ■■■■ •n• Dee ■e••eeeeee•e••eeeeea•e••n••e•■ ifN MMMMMMMMMiar • • • n • eeeutee INIOR ele ■ ■eee1111ee•e••er. ■•ee• 1111• ■MMMMMM11••eeeMM MM•e••e•MM ANN•n■e•••••.••ee•••••••a n••••■ 9. MMMM••■■eeer:•■ 111111■ •••e••.•ee••eMMMMMMMMM ■ eeeeeeeeeee, reeeeeee11eeee11e1111e1111eee1111e1111e��eee11eee■ ■ eeee• ee••U F4I••■•• ■ ■••e•••e••UUIU•U••eee•••.ee•Un ■•••1111.•••1/ eeee•■■ ■•.e••••••••e•••••••e11ee••11.11•■ A MINM MMMMM MM•••••ee•11••••.ee.e..•.•eee■ ■■• 11e e• eeo•■ e•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••ee•••11e• ■■•■■ 11e er.■■ e••■■••■ ■•e•e••••••••••••••••11e••11•e••■ ■■ III eeeeeeeeeee■ 11eee11e• ■••ee••aeeeeee• eeee ■••e•e•e•e•eeee•eee11•eeeeeee•e■ u & ■•■I•e••••••••••••■ eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee■ ■PU eeeeeeee■••••••■ ■••• •: o•••••••••••••••• •••••••••uumu•••••••••••••••••• ■eeee••• •eeeeee eeee ■e•••••••••••••••••.•••• ■•eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee •eeee■ •••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••nnuu••uu ••nnuii (0 7 . WATER- CONTENT- PERCENT MATERIAL. REFERENCE MATERIAL . MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. (%) trct WiAUt IYPE (PCF) ( %) ( %) / i a � .,e._ S=7 ; � 3 s 6.7 r3. m•/ 129.0 13o.3 ,VA 6.? 64Z /e.S 6.0 ?5 2- 74.4 97,') ( %) 0. l a7 0.4 0.9 FAIL P P f P Salw.r.. R'n,tr ta.%e, s0PW, afar So1wtt.. El w1aw`k, I-C n aet I Ma.t (Aver tektite 4 N 3 So Ka., SIAJ.a14- 3 y n Sa I hW471 ver 143.• e-/ @to 4.491 kip f4 S'E.oc AGRA }rth & Environmental PROJECT NAME vev -Ox k pod. 3� PROJECT No. /2- /3 r 1 DATE 10 FIELD REPORT No. PAGE OF TEST TEST No. METHOD _ SL..bbrat TEST NUMBER DT DENSITY TEST RT = RETEST TEST METHOD ("NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) AGRA E &E Field Rep. (Initials) AGRA Earth 8 Environmental, Inc (Rev. 7/94) SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS PERCENT COMPACTION BASED OM ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 ❑ OTHER AGRA E&E Project Manager (Initials) DAILY FIELD REPORT FIELD DISTANCE -- DRY FIELD ELEV. BELOW MATT. DENSITY MOIST VARIATION FROM FIELD OPTIMUM COMP. MOIST.' PASS OR SPECIFICATION: ❑ 90% D 698 ❑ 95% D 698 ❑ 90%01557 ❑ 90%01557 ❑ OTHER Contractors Rep. (Initials), Continued ❑ trct WiAUt IYPE (PCF) ( %) ( %) 1 AI �aaIW%13 t Pt Vc.- Ia..e, 40 of .�•,dra. Ant. ts s. c r3. m•/ 129.0 13o.3 ,VA 6.? 64Z /e.S 6.0 ?5 2- 74.4 97,') ( %) 0. l a7 0.4 0.9 FAIL P P f P Salw.r.. R'n,tr ta.%e, s0PW, afar So1wtt.. El w1aw`k, I-C n aet I Ma.t (Aver tektite 4 N 3 So Ka., SIAJ.a14- 3 y Sa I hW471 ver 143.• e-/ @to 4.491 kip f4 S'E.oc A AGRA }rth & Environmental PROJECT NAME vev -Ox k pod. 3� PROJECT No. /2- /3 r 1 DATE 10 FIELD REPORT No. PAGE OF TEST TEST No. METHOD _ SL..bbrat TEST NUMBER DT DENSITY TEST RT = RETEST TEST METHOD ("NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) AGRA E &E Field Rep. (Initials) AGRA Earth 8 Environmental, Inc (Rev. 7/94) SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS PERCENT COMPACTION BASED OM ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 ❑ OTHER AGRA E&E Project Manager (Initials) DAILY FIELD REPORT FIELD DISTANCE -- DRY FIELD ELEV. BELOW MATT. DENSITY MOIST VARIATION FROM FIELD OPTIMUM COMP. MOIST.' PASS OR SPECIFICATION: ❑ 90% D 698 ❑ 95% D 698 ❑ 90%01557 ❑ 90%01557 ❑ OTHER Contractors Rep. (Initials), Continued ❑ SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS VARIATION FIELD FROM DISTANCE DRY FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS TEST ELEV. BELOW MATS DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. METHOD LOCATION (FEET) GRADE. TYPE (PCF) ( %) (%) ( %) FAIL / N � IF N 0.aA Ave., 26` d a,&;44-64.. yo'F• . G + i , i . S 7 4 2 . €Law4 Ate. � t1 , 44 443 to y fRi t�7L'/f�lgi/L� >� ■, n o ai ...AwAINv,a - ..�.l�e... 7S �F.O LI ( 3 D I 1 .(ratA4 Aix. 4 .2 . 1 - 35" ' .O Sa1lAr.e... 21 v! -Iamr. i S i S. nit LL w 132.. 4.0 9S.G 6.7 P R, e. IVC la) Bcej CptavSej PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON • SPECIFICATION: C `l 1•� - N • ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 695 ❑ 90%0696 ❑ 95% D698 (' ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 ❑ 90%01557 ❑ 90% D 1557 ' ❑ OTHER ❑ OTHER ST NUMBER MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM ' TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) 1 ^ 1 'i-7/� j Q �(y� A le, i'ASP (70 i .5e Z L J 37 6e 7 DT•'ENSITY TEST RT=RETEST - TEST METHOD Iv I CM NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM 0 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D - • A AGRA E &E Field Rep. (Initials)�J N t AGRA E &E Project Manager (Initials) Contractors Rep. (Initials) Continued ■ PROJECT NAM r L v0.vcvalk a 4 k Ag TJ's..c PROJECT No. ) 2 -I3 FIELD REPORT No. DATE ^�T M -.27 -9 S 7 4 2 AG R A ;arch & Environmental AGRA Earth & Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT .SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS • - .. VARIATION .. - FIELD FROM . ' ' DISTANCE DRY RECD FIELD OPTIMUM .PASS . TEST .. - ELEV ` - BELOW ' MAIL • DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. METHOD LOCATION (FEET) . GRADE TYPE (PCF) (%) ( %) ( %) FAIL 1 fJ lR-+' LL. Gt SALLuOA.> FLUF1(: 1-1-106- 5' J1, OF •. cu Sub(: A 10 r( ( L pB . 134.•9 I 7.7 `1`31 DATE '. /p ". ��. /�( 7S • f I • oP 5x1Lop Iitct t 1.04 (2l 1 it). wt / u TJVOItAR)F1, gvE 3 u.of E of t C r SAissmou L?tLtK- (.aLk LtA%SUDTApA 7' .Sot t - 0/5 Ls ABL 132,5 q. 4 1 .{ j Y E Cr t SALILLC et C LA" ;'5'0; t TuArrauA A1 s - !� I O 0 11 - a 0 ( p ta n L1 (o t," Iv ' ' NS ACC. i5 Tit . (� (�LI•u 1�1,2. (3a, 7. to (-1. y.. • qj-( 4'S.t `Ci,U W,6.. I (� ,. , (-- P n 5 1 „„, i E . 4 0.' SAL.NI DL.., 4_t uE ;. L Nt0C L)' 5. of 4 to To bin\uP (D -Itillta C 4 S's or F SV.uL.LD (.? 1 Ce12 LAbc 4 cN 21,)0tApA ' l 44;o e t- 0. - 1.-4,-; Kttil:lL LADE 5 ' 5 GF t. Ztmt *NA, - oc0 E t: 64' SALLLnOI tttCt;l_ LA.4 �.< 3 GP V c>J ThJNAA)rk LI — `i . �. QS iafrf � ') U P �( v . i E cE (: 6 Sti1Ate RLL)t\L (Sloe CAO t or aub104 4, Avc U II (- P6e 1313' 3.'/ KT p PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON: SPECIFICATION: • STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 ❑ 90% D 690 ❑ 95% D 698 ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 ❑ 90%01557 ❑ 90% D 1557 ❑ OTHER OTHER _ TEST NUMBER MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM . TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) ��: - t NJ L'.�'.17i: f: - -1 g! ' : . /,7 7 l c. 7 DT= DENSITY TEST RT = RETEST TEST METHOD N = NUCLEAR (ASTM 0 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) AGRA E &E Field Rep. (Initials) AGRA E &E Project Manager (Initials) Contractors Rep. (Initials) Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME .' LIt fl . • Q ? 2' , 4pair+o,Li PROJECT No. . - " .1a-i3tl FIELD REPORT No.' • - ,2/ .. DATE '. /p ". ��. /�( 7S PAGE ^� a a. " , ,AGRA ,rth &.Environmental rton men lal, Inc. (Rev. DA ILY ` FIELD REPORT SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS VARIATION FIELD FROM DISTANCE DRY FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS TEST ELEV. BELOW MATT DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. METHOD LOCATION (FEET) G DC TYPE (PCF) ( %) ( %) ( %) FAIL Q d < `gam I al i Li. OF SAi -iitou (eIOCL. LAL3 5' AJ. OF j t..; To;DLY'RfJA - JO It O b ,LL it P3C. Ave_ I% .1 13il.J 7.7 3.7 911 96.1 e 1_ 3 tr1 r L C'P saL_MACp g.Lt)e - L14. .2.' N- OF t nu TNDIAIJA Ave w et E OF t_ of - 5A{56LA0F% (2{L:a (.7ue 3 7-L JbIAt_Ni 7' .5og `0 C9 P &L 13„2,5 4.1 93.) P 4 1 59' E or t 5AtAtov ♦ L:‘-n_ t_A :c 7`S aF t 7 Dt4UA (+L.tt _ :lac " E E or SAL.vvLO-: a: a LAe)E S' 5. aF 4 Ou r'iJOL>aut. 11 1 0 O b (o /J$ Abe_ ( a7.1 134,0 7.40 4.-? 76 - .0 ( nD P 5 67 ¢ or S„uLAOp luUcYt_ 04.1c 5'3 JF k Of tJ�trkuA (I `I ' ( ` N Ia 7.(u 96.<7 96.<7 P _-7 { 4,.. woo E t 1 a? .3%,, KLJL-YL-• t....5,06- 5. ^ 5' oP / T�(O tr.) aro, Athol E F op sm.:V.Of-; iat th2 Li'V)t g a or- u o .�Nn,a 4 o A —9 19 1 (o' tits 1)5 WC ' X9 (12 QC 95.8' 9S,( P P �` ct go c*, t oc SIJ&Z RL LAS c90 � OP DJbtp A A■c 0 (9 Rbe 131:' 3.4 4S.dr PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON: SPECIFICATION: ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM 0698 ❑ 90% D 698 ❑ 95% 0 698 ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 ❑ 90% 0 1557 ❑--�� WJ�l 90% 01557 ❑ OTHER OTHER 7)/537 / 'T/ E2 TEST NUMBER MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PGF) MOIST. (%) 11 C IT,7_ F � il{( �G � �35' 7 (0.7 DT = DENSITY TEST RT = RETEST TEST METHOD ni S �/L } �^ L-an)r S. 1_33 (0:`5 N = NUCLEAR (ASTM 0 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) ' DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) AGRA E&E Field Rep. (Initials) AGRA E&E Project Manager (Initials) Contractors Rep. (Initials) Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME 1 n)A 4alAt -K. Q d < `gam A1- 40aTON PROJECT No. Ia'13.61 DATE FIELD REPORT No. .21 PAGE a ` AGRA earth & Environmental AGRA Earth 6 Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED, • TYPE OF STRUCTURE INSPECTED 0 RESTEEL 0 STRUCTURAL STEEL FABRICATOR REINFORCED CONCRETE ❑ STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION REINFORCED MASONRY EXPANSION BOLTS ❑ SHOTCRETE y� ((�"'' C] F �RE PR FING ( X OTHER (SPedfY) v"t1 y�.lpi r /ICU G V Cif f–le ❑ FOOTINGS ❑ AUGER CAST PILING GRADE BEAMS ❑ WALLS OTHER (Specify) 0 COLUMNS II SLAB-ON -GRADE STRUCTURAL GRADE ❑ POST TENSIONED SLAB Rn 1 t —Ct. ,—b SLUMP (IN.) ' • © DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) 7 No. OF SAMPLES NCRET MORTAR TYPE OF MORTAR n SUPPLIER 4C_Frt P MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. OL SLUMP (IN.) SLUMP (IN.) ' • © DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) 7 No. OF SAMPLES ol�Q�rhe 1.4< TOTAL CU YARDS •,• CED MORTAR TEMP. (Deg E) TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED TIME AIR TEMP. NCRET GROUT SUPPLIER n SUPPLIER 4C_Frt P MIX # 75 o (, MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. OL SLUMP (IN.) SLUMP (IN.) ' • © AIR CONTENT LI 7 DESIGN STRENGTH (P51) 310O0 ol�Q�rhe 1.4< No. OF SAMPLES / TOTAL CU • DS PLACED TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED PERMIT NUMBER WEATHER A Lie, 4 lA/ 30 TIME CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) / 7 ENGINEER TIME /n : 0 ,qt• AIR TEMP. 3 -7 AGRA arth & Environmental YES NO Inspector ALL ITEMS ABOVE WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BUILDING DEP`AENT APPROVED PLANS IF NO EXPLAIN AGRA Earth & Environmental. IAc. (Rev. 11/94) _CALA in_ Date 1 ) —ln _9 MATERIAL FIELD REPORT GROUT SUPPLIER PROJECT RAMS, nn T.1.lt. 1A }a\� 0J MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. I �Q_.lLnQ� SLUMP (IN.) PROD CT No. /kTNo/. D/) — -9 DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) LOCATION No. OF SAMPLES ol�Q�rhe 1.4< 1 Cr J'Rokkll ay TOTAL CU • DS PLACED GR• TEMP. (Deg F.) PERMIT NUMBER WEATHER A Lie, 4 lA/ 30 TIME AIR TEMP. AGRA arth & Environmental YES NO Inspector ALL ITEMS ABOVE WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BUILDING DEP`AENT APPROVED PLANS IF NO EXPLAIN AGRA Earth & Environmental. IAc. (Rev. 11/94) _CALA in_ Date 1 ) —ln _9 MATERIAL FIELD REPORT SPECIFIC LOCATION(S) PROJECT RAMS, nn T.1.lt. 1A }a\� 0J 3 rt(� I �Q_.lLnQ� K� 5 � PROD CT No. /kTNo/. D/) — -9 FIELD REPORT No. � PAGE OF LOCATION n GOP ol�Q�rhe 1.4< 1 Cr J'Rokkll ay o r� 1 PERMIT NUMBER WEATHER A Lie, 4 lA/ 30 CLIENT OR 1 NER a. � ma ENGINEER _ _ 4�1 GENERAL CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT 3EMARKS AGRA arth & Environmental YES NO Inspector ALL ITEMS ABOVE WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BUILDING DEP`AENT APPROVED PLANS IF NO EXPLAIN AGRA Earth & Environmental. IAc. (Rev. 11/94) _CALA in_ Date 1 ) —ln _9 MATERIAL FIELD REPORT SPECIFIC LOCATION(S) GRIDS I �Q_.lLnQ� K� 5 � r, y^ C�a S- /f \ ((�� Sa IW'CL\ lam✓ I4tAt Ia\ t et n GOP ^ r��.L 41, 1 Cr J'Rokkll ay o r� 1 3EMARKS CO t iA CM' SIP ` 1 Li)( he S M1 e Q/ V 1 CA S' / Qi e hP /nai' 1.1..e_ es ... r a :. ' •. .. • • A • . . • , •• i t K V _ , _ a CONRNUED ❑ AGRA arth & Environmental YES NO Inspector ALL ITEMS ABOVE WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BUILDING DEP`AENT APPROVED PLANS IF NO EXPLAIN AGRA Earth & Environmental. IAc. (Rev. 11/94) _CALA in_ Date 1 ) —ln _9 MATERIAL FIELD REPORT R e ltA47 -'r.. �+A #1MLAtteiWATORY DA TAi ..., . CATESPECIMMNS CAST ) /-- G .9 s DATE SPECIMANS PLANT No. O I1' 7 -'6 SUBMITTED LAB ID No. TEST DATE FIELD CURE AGE (DAYS) SIZE (IN) AREA (50 IN) WEIGHT (LBS) MAX LOAD (LBS) STRENGTH (P51) SET No. LAB TECH - . nit s,w/ zz 30s 2 _ 6 / - — — _ o __- �_. - 0 _ 70 a O ^ DESIGN STRENGTH .3 0 PSI d ) . DAYS . .7 TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED — YDS AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS LOAD SIZE / O YDS3 ._ . t3 _r T _ ,rat REMARKS di A 11 4 Gip 1a` tai, /&.A7 A7 _ `t - /r tis DAT SUPPLIER 4 c MIX No. '790 6 / PLANT No. O JOB MIX TEST RE T o. CONCRETE GRO(JT Ell MORTAR FLEX BEAMS PRISMS GROUTED III UNGROUTED • OTHER TEMP. (Deg. F) YIELD/UNIT TIME E TRUCK No. - TICKET No. X NR SLUMP CON AIR WEIGHT to3O s,w/ zz 30s y 2 o 6 / 3 -7 — ^ DESIGN STRENGTH .3 0 PSI d ) . DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED — YDS AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS LOAD SIZE / O YDS3 PROJECT NAME n ` PROJECT No. TEST RE T o. LOCATION E DATE R / � -9 PAGE WEATMER OF q ( , &41 l CLIENT OR t4 .n � T 1 I 1VPiJ• Q y ENGINEER T (^ J-n 1(1 PCx f �H=! r ARCHITECT GENERALCONTRACTO K �. AG R A rth & Environmental PLA CEMENTAR EA 9 FOOTINGS ❑ WALLS ❑ COLUMNS GRADE BEAMS ❑ SLAB/DECK ❑ SLAB 9 PILINGS OTIER INSPECTOR Reviewed by AGRA Earth 8 Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) I o11 -Lk n ►j r REMARKS' l m^ N44 !k / 171 r. r r REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. 2 GRIDS S Cr 10... 1 2 \. N fi t - 7 5 n4 Sni ■ c_ Date / L MATERIAL TEST REPORT CEMENT TYPE 9 DESIGN MIX No. CEM LBS. F ASH LAS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. SAND LBS. H20 LBS. REPORTED BATCH DATA ADMIXTURES AIR ENT I OZ/CWT WATER ADDED 9 ACTUAL' BT LBS. LBS. ALL ITEMS INSPECTED ARE: FORMING NON - CONFORMING TEST METHOD ASTM C 39 AASHTO T22 9 OTHER (Specify) COMPRESSIVE ❑ FLEXURAL ❑ CONFORMING NONCONFORMIN( MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) 4 - A-75 vrfa/f g 6toic (3, 7 7 r i DATE , /1 — -9s q O F 4 / sal.,” A1..✓ tame 35 Le. O4 Salw,cA • ,vc C Sc \..AC.. , 2tive.. lA,.., • 4 w• oar Sal nncr • Q.x vla t Ca A..9. r.,,,l.nv.e $4119,N e to Qvc-lay..e; , O O I E. v{"Sa 1 `.e— 4,...A..... (3 1.7. �,..sl....# $ al ww -, 911,2 lAn.e• 0r ni IUGv\aty. la C. (..“1.-.1`, v, 1`, g 129.E 13o.75 1.27.7 128.E 27 5.0 6 3.7 ;3 1 .SS (� 6 93.1 y3.9 92.1 92.7 'Z:Z. 1.7 1. 1 3.0 3.10 /.2 /1 y/ � / Q `/(�� / 3 PROJECT NAME y � K ti1re�,A/A11C •3 sf z, (to „S PROJECT Na /? — /T // FIELD REPORT No. on r i DATE , /1 — -9s q O F 4 / I . / l v 2)ULV to ti 3O AI. o-r1: t \ r i ...: sal.,” A1..✓ tame 35 Le. O4 Salw,cA • ,vc C Sc \..AC.. , 2tive.. lA,.., • 4 w• oar Sal nncr • Q.x vla t Ca A..9. r.,,,l.nv.e $4119,N e to Qvc-lay..e; , O O I E. v{"Sa 1 `.e— 4,...A..... (3 1.7. �,..sl....# $ al ww -, 911,2 lAn.e• 0r ni IUGv\aty. la C. (..“1.-.1`, v, 1`, g 129.E 13o.75 1.27.7 128.E 27 5.0 6 3.7 ;3 1 .SS (� 6 93.1 y3.9 92.1 92.7 'Z:Z. 1.7 1. 1 3.0 3.10 /.2 /1 y/ � / Q `/(�� / 3 S //� �P C r r 5 (F�ve t- tau* :ace"' G , . r Salrwe . PTV«.. S " r... -6h,nt Sal......., 2 1ve- tamk ;aSetlw.c...16acv IA.ne re. ch.. _ - 7 S 3 t l v v . . . . 11vevla Kt; / S' ij. o- V /a «/• 93.1 , .•l $AG RA /Earth & Environmental TEST TEST No. METHOD , g. vs TEST NUMBER pi'• ENSITY TEST RT = RETEST &&k-Se e Luz? Y-ypvl TEST METHOD LEIf NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) AGRA E &E Field Rep. (Initials)SM AGRA Earth 8. Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 794) SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS LOCATION ❑ OTHER ODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 DISTANCE ELEV. BELOW ;FEET) GRADE PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON: ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 MAIL TYPE FIELD DRY DENSITY AGRA E &E Project Manager (Initials) 1, L Contractors Rep. (Initials) DAILY FIELD REPORT FIELD FIELD MOIST. COMP. VARIATION FROM OPTIMUM PASS MOIST. OR SPECIFICATION: ❑ 90 %D698 ❑ 95 %D 696 ❑ 90% D 1557 ❑ 90% D 1557 57 OTHER / .24 (Jj s / Continued ❑ E 520 North Foothills Drive, Suite 600 SpOkano, Washington, U.S.A. 99207 i ;3 . # SPECIFIC GRAVITY- OFBITUMINOUS M IXTURES I Project: el0 El2wA Lk_ a c 3" "' 4t. 1 io,o Project #: 42_/3// Sample #: Depth: Lab #- ' .�1a_ Location/Source: TWI404 Aoe Ca� Safes -tile. _ io'ti Op i > Date Tested' /1- '_ 9,5 Material Description: A SH , 0 -- Tested By: to 4,_2, cm _ — JAR (PYCNOMETER) CALIBRATION Wt. ofJar, Glass A 02980. y g 07980,$ g 079$0, % g Wt. of Water, Jar, Glass B 7 38.3 . , g /38'1. I g 7 3 . g g Temperature of Water C 71- --/ ° F 7$', a °F 7 y, 6 °F (Gw) Temperature Conversion Factor D 39 7 Sal . 997 .29ro , 9'7737V (Vp) VolumeofJar(B -A) +D E, yy Ia.ti cc. E_ 'HQ. 2- cc E} I yy1i, -. CC le Gllb[woo ED- INurnta No. wnba I (AVG VP) (E, + + E 3 ) =3 I F C' u 1 1 .9 CC SPECIFIC GRAVITY & MAXIMUM DENSITY of No Sublet cc Ten No No Sublot or Test No. No. Sublot or Tat No. Wt. ofJar, Glass 1 o 24gb. w g g g Wt. of Sample, Jar, Glass 2 L i o 1a, 0 g g g (Ws) Wt. of Sample 2- 1 3 /09/. a. g g g Wt. of Water, Sample, Jar, Glass 4 3035.3 g g g (Ww) Wt. of Water 4 - 2 5 39103.3 g g g Temperature of Water 6 733 ° °F °F (Gw) Temperature Conversion Factor 7 ,9y 7 `(77 Volume of Water 5 - 7 8 3973.3 °C o Volume of Sample F - 8 9 1133 cc cc cc (Gz) Specific Gravity 3 _ 9 10 a, 487 (MDT) Max Density Test Result 10 X 62.4 11 /55, , PCF PCF PCF Difference Between' 11 & Last MAMD PCF PCF PCF MOVING AVERAGE MAXIMUM DENSITY (MAMD) No. of MDT, Aven MAMD (Using MDT From 11) • No. MAMD PC No. MAMD i PC F No. MAMD PCF Remarks: RICEFORM.Ptm 5/12/94 - AG R A Checked by: E 520 North Foothills Drive, Suite 600 SpOkano, Washington, U.S.A. 99207 i ;3 . # SPECIFIC GRAVITY- OFBITUMINOUS M IXTURES SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS VARIATION FIELD FROM DISTANCE ' DRY FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS TEST ELEV. BELOW MATI DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. METHOD LOCATION • (FEET) GRADE TYPE (PCF) ( %) (%) (%) FAIL ' 4- 2 N a Ave-- 5. 5 Y j s.■ ,x ila.�t DATE / — 9 -95 PAGE ��- /f OC kat s 3 — 4 y s„01, Ac '.f al a,.ek „e, 1 2'E. cW w..,, eti I..a 7 e At -el — && _ reT..4 14-v So w. Salnw.a : t a- Aft Po p +3 ( — — 9y .o 9z �/, — - P P 1 ) -1- /} vc., ®5„w K,.cvlane b.Ll &Is,ecl 4.....4,4.-....„, Aut., /00'a•oFSAl,. -, liw..a,.e.. 1015. oc 5 . MKA hot, , !$'cv • o f Sw byte.* gat.- 1... /,....bh A 142, — 92. I — 7 , �S'AJ.ofs. .4ta.'•A • i 3 C Se-a14. -ta. , ...e. 193 Z - 92,3 - {� rnatoAa Aut., 4 So 'a/.a{ Snakes t l't3.L - ca.3 — P 7 7 . ) lV rtan RN.wof-ct luv.n Att. rota) . onSnavt-Wsuer'ant 'A). s.l,,.I,I:.,, �G /Y.�S� _ P /0 TY.a.a , 25 at Sa lino., Zw..le..p iS:V.0 R.G+v),h.,t /It,1 19s.7 — - 13.3 '13,0 — _ P / / 3 - 41....., 3 3 A,,e.., 16o'a.�. oC5 a V-e Qiwv Ia.K ..k ' z Z%4'la.A A„e., a 5..att L'lvlw)a..e 44eKPr^�r N 6.,..14,, N k S'S 4T f 6.,..14,, )43.9 - 93. I — I nd'AAA AJe. e Sa IVAC6. feVev,w ` }/ lA �r- bo.� u, Al l/ 0 — 9?.3 P � K 41 pru-tran ts+lAw_-fres-1 s PERCENT ❑ STANDARD r //�� MODIFIED Aft.... OTHER 0.4 COMPACTION BASED PROCTOR ASTM 0 698 PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 !I L N ON. SPECIFICATION: ❑ 90% D 698 ❑ 95 %0698 o A ❑ 90% D 15577 3fiL D 1557 ' A B C- A OTHER 92 Z _ TEST NUMBER MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) DT DENSITY TEST RT= RETEST TEST METHOD n� /'. I • ltt I /, llrN�lfG� !J 1 T-a njt Pu%s Cou .vs a Z /3 g' 7 / •••'++'J� V / A /C- 1 F kg a R s r asq,se /6 2 - —. ill L 327 '1 ft I) /C 0 NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM 0 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) .1 yiT� . AGRA E &E Field Rep. (Initials) \ AGRA E &E Project Manager (Initials) Contractors - Rep. (Initials) Continued ❑ AGRA Earth 8 Envvonnmroi ,.. ,o....T.. PROJECT MAWR �/ ¢ j �j ���/I'J� V u�Q I l� �Y tSIT7�''t PROJECT No. /n7 _ 1�� I/ FIELD REPORT No. O DATE / — 9 -95 PAGE ��- /f OC OF JAG RA jarth & Environmental DAILY FIELD REPORT SPECIFIC GRAY ITY.OFaBITUMINOUS MIXTURES OSHD TM'306 -A (F) WORKSHEET Project: 4 U& t, 4oc. or , S ' 3 ,4. 6 Project #: 1a -13// Sample #: 1 Depth: Lab #: 3a8' Location/Source: xoD,4 i : iDe> F LU o aJntce klutn z 5'N d p s. Date Tested: ?,_ /0_ S'cS Cu4P. UN F Material Description: AsprIAL a il " ,h I x Tested By:1 z — JAR (PY iMETER) CALIBRATION Wt. ofJar, Glass __`l .297 -1c g &979, (o g a?7i;: . b g Wt. of Water, Jar, Glass 73750, b g 738V, G g 7383 g Temperature of Water j U 73,'/ ° F 70 , c/ ° F 70, b °F (Gw) Temperature Conversion Factor _ 0 ,` ?'75 ± 7 , ` 979 t 7 • 7 $ c# (Vp) Volume of Jar (B - A) _ D E 'I y I l.$ C C E, i WI/ Pt cc E, 7 cj W/3.6 CC Jar m. Calibrmioo Worksheet (AVG. VP) (E E,+ E,) - 3 F x (5 ! ! , 3• CC SPECIFIC GRAVITY & MAXIMUM DENSITY La No. ISublot or Tat No. Let No. Sublet or Test No. Lot No. Sublet a Tat No. Wt. of Jar, Glass 1 2977.6 g g g Wt. of Sample, Jar, Glass 2 39(96 .1 g g g (Ws) Wt. of Sample 2- 1 3 986.5 g g g Wt. of Water, Sample, Jar, Glass 4 - 7976. D. g g g (Ww)Wt.ofWater 4 -2 5 ybp‘i. g g g Temperature of Water 6 7/, 5 °F °F °F (Gw) Temperature Conversion Factor 7 ,94 3`?'1 Volume of Water 5= 7 . 8 <-(6/ `/. 6 � cc cc Volume of Sample F- 8 9 3913, lo cc cc cc (Gz) Specific Gravity 3 _ 9 10 a, '17 (MDT) Max Density Test Result 10 x 62.4 11 i 5 V S PCF . PCF PCF Difference Between' 11 & Last MAMD PCF PCF PCF MOVING AVERAGE MAXIMUM DENSITY (MAMD) No. o(MDTs Averaged MAMD (Using MDT From 11) No. ' MAMD PCF No. I MAMD 1 PCF No. MAMD PCF Remarks: RICEFORM.PUB 5n2/94 AG 13 A I Checked by: /,)7 Earth & Envtronmenta E 520 North Foothilis brive, Suite 600 Spokane, Washington, USA 99207 SPECIFIC GRAVITYOFsBITUMINOUS.MIXTURES' . OSHD TM 306 -A (F) WORKSHEET • Project: C.oe&umL'c aw'' Igoo;rto,O Project #: l a_izt l Sample #: Depth: Lab #: 33i Location/Source: 3. & i:. A 'etue7 RD ne 34.1"1°' 4,,a RD -44-31-• S or C Date Tested: 'f-/5. 9 C Material Description: A?)NACT eCASS A' Tested By: w. >�ocDe7L- — JAIL (PYC METER) CALIBRATION Wt. ofJar , Glass a ci g.y g rQ &7q.l /' g, 73 g q7 q. k1 g WI. of Water, Jar, Glass B 7 .379,(, g 7 3 g 3. a g Temperature of Water U 7 9 , 4 / ° F 7n , 9 ° F 7 a D of (Gw) Temperature Conversion Factor I ?19i5 g q 7 R C 1 . E, 1 y 9 / 3 l cc (Vp) Volume ofJar (B - A) D E, 99//./ cc E2 2 7 1 9/ ?, cc lar m. No. C+Ilblatico woruhcci Number (AVG. VP) (E,+ E,+ E,) _ 3 F /�/ / 7 / .2 .) cc SPECIFIC GRAVITY & MAXIMUM DENSITY La No. Sublot or Tc t No. Lot No. Sublot or Tea No. La No. Sublot or Tat No, Wt. ofJar, Glass 1 . t/ g g g Wt. of Sample, Jar, Glass 2 ("ONE( . ? g g g (Ws) Wt. of Sample 2- 1 3 IO35. 5 g g g Wt. of Water, Sample, Jar, Glass 4 *do / , ZS g g g (Ww) Wt. of Water 4- 2 5 3986 l g g g Temperature of Water 6 70R.. °F °F °F (Gw) Temperature Conversion Factor 7 .997 tact Volume of Water 5 _ 7 8 3495. )- cc cc cc Volume of Sample F - 8 9 41 1.5 cc cc cc (Gz) Specific Gravity 3 - 9 10 .2.4$O (MDT) Max Density Test Result 10 x 62.4 11 /5 ? PCF PCF PCF Difference Between - 11 & Last MAMD PCF PCF PCF MOVING AVERAGE MAXIMUM DENSITY (MAMD) No of MDT: Averaged MAMD (Using MDT From 11) No. ' MAMD PCF No. MAMD 1 PCF No. MAMD PCF Remarks: RICEFORM.PU1 511294 A G R A Checked by: ar & Env E 520 North Foothills olive, Suite 600 Spokane, Washington, USA 99207 AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. E. 520 North Foothills Drive, Suite 600 Spokane, Washington 99207 (509)482 -0104 Fax (509)482 -0202 s CLIENT LEAN s f-/Aws DATE 1\ -4 95 PROJECT 1JCiz uDAL\c PROJECT # 1 a. 13 t 1 LAB. NO. 5// METHOD USED " ASPHALT EXTRACTION TEST SAMPLE LOCATION/IDENTIFICATION rf s ", ;x A. WT. OF MIX + BOWL J. WT. OF H SAMPLE + PAN B. WT. OF BOWL K WT. OF PAN ion9.5 C. WT. OF MIX / ¶30) (A -B) L. WET WT. OF 11 SAMPLE' /7V. 8' (J -K) D. WT. OF DIATOMACEOUS EARTH 1 Yt•7 _ M. DRY WT. OF H SAMPLE +PAN aa1 C E. WT. OF FILTER +AGG aoS. N. DRY WT. OF H SAMPLE /eVD (M -K) F. WT. OF FILTER L,. O P. % DRY MATERIAL IN SAMPLE .999 (RECORD TO NEAREST 1/100% (N +1) X(100) G. WT. OF AGG. ON FILTER ) 1 (E -F) H. WT. OF AGG. AFTER EXT. I �o7 I I. TOTAL WT. OF AGG. / 7 37.4 (H +G) -D %ASPHALT BY TOTAL V/T. OF MIX SD ( (C l 1 {111 (Record of nearest 1/100%) . x 11001 ((CxP1 1 SIEVE ANALYSIS OF AGGREGATE SIEVE SIZE CUMULATIVE WEIGHT RETAINED CUMULATIVE WEIGI-$T PASSING PERCENT PASSING SPEC REMARKS / 1y - e - ( )7 37.6 1 00 /oa 1 l �.S 16 7 01.I 96,ra 90 -/0O P,-2.6 1 SS. o FF 3. 7 67 -36 1 6 - . R . /. 1 3 C 97 C6 771.0 5 6. 1 400 -TIC '10 - ea I ILI 7(01.0 /0 I/ 7/. ' 5 65'.fr 3,2.5 .5-y0 YO / y8 3,a q 5 y /'i,G /o - a3 D2e0 /L66.7 /3D,9 7 .2.6 -Y DRY WEIGHT OF SAMPLE /A,,,R 7 / TECHN CIAN W. NoCDE . RY WEIGHT AFTER WASH SAMPLED BY JA ,p „ REVIEWED BY L,' /.1 REMARKS: . 4 it AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. E. 520 North Foothills Drive, Suite 600 Spokane, Washington 99207 (509)482 -0104 Fax (509)482 -0202 CLIENT tea.3- LIatc75Lct( DATE / /- /3 -9.3 PROJECT 2&UCL iL'/ ,?'-O< 3O"' Aoo1T, PROJECT# J. 1 . 3 / I LAB. NO. afl METHOD USED SAMPLE LOCATION/IDENTIFICATION ASPHALT EXTRACTION TEST CcAss `, sew &l iMtcS A. WT. OF MIX + BOWL J. WT. OF H SAMPLE + PAN B. WT. OF BOWL 20 to. 3 K WT. OF PAN Itff4. S C. WT. OF MIX /V 78% 7 (A -B) L. WET WT. OF H SAMPLE /106..8 (J -K) D. WT. OF DIATOMACEOUS EARTH 148• t( M. DRY WT. OF Hp SAMPLE +PAN 2I8S,1 E. WT. OF FILTER +AGG .2aa. 3 N. DRY WT. OF H SAMPLE I IOIs>.2 -(M -K) F. WT. OF FILTER i , 9 P. % DRY MATERIAL IN (RECORD TO NEAREST SAMPLE ,999 1/100% (N +1.) X(100) G. WT. OF AGG. ON FILTER al q. 4 (E -F) H. WT. OF AGG. AFTER EXT. 133`/.g I. TOTAL WT. OF AGG. /'fa0.%' (H +G) -D • - % ASPHALT BY TOTAL WT. OF (Reard of MIX 5. / Litel 4111 x 0001 nearest 1/100%) . ((CaPI 1 SIEVE ANALYSIS OF AGGREGATE SIEVE SIZE CUMULATIVE WEIGHT RETAINED CUMULATIVE WEIGHT PASSING PERCENT PASSING SPEC . REMARKS 3 /q O ( tLIRt,g t ° l00 1 12. 101.E 1359.to 95,7 4o - too 3 '�� a 56,% t /65,3 84.3 75 -9 Ai (195,4 945! 9 /os. / 55-75 10 404.5 5 /to - 310. To- Yo 'let 11410. 02451 / 15,T rl- ad &rxs 131a,9 /0 ?.9 7.10 ,3.0- 7,3 sus cF spec- DRY CRY WEIGHT WEIGHT OF SAMPLE AFTER WASH TECHNICIAN BY JA Uawe •NGL Ot SAMPLED Mf i ,. REVIEWED BY Z 6 4,40 REMARKS: sau,.w„ 12i okra_ Eo qR, so, Li asJ 12wek l� ,, MT. ' Sour» op t . AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. E. 520 North Foothills Drive, Suite 600 Spokane, Washington 99207 // (509)482 -0104 Fax (509)482 -0202 CLIENT Jr-4� /JA cscr DATE // -/3 - 95 PROJECT l et OCQW A c tc er 7 ,4b *rio PROJECT# /a-73// LAB. NO. 3027 METHOD USED r /('/ / c / 3(o ASPHALT EXTRACTION TEST • SAMPLE LOCATION/IDENTIFICATION i R ". nai A. WT. OF MIX + BOWL J. WT. OF H SAMPLE + PAN B. WT. OF BOWL K WT. OF PAN 1 C. WT. OF MIX /ID 3 (A -B) L. WET WT. OF H SAMPLE I 0lo'T. 0 (J -K) D. WT. OF DIATOMACEOUS EARTH 1 V-1 M. DRY WT. OF H SAMPLE +PAN .2140.5 E. WT. OF FILTER +AGG r 91-4, N. DRY WT. OF H SAMPLE 10(97.3 (M -K) F. WT. OF FILTER 5. 7 P. % DRY MATERIAL IN SAMPLE ,9993 (RECORD TO NEAREST to W%(N •L) X(100) G. WT. OF AGG. ON FILTER /rt. c (E-F) H. WT. OF AGG. AFTER EXT. / /-174. I . TOTAL WT. OF AGG. / S o , ' (H +G) -D _ %ASPHALT BY TOTAL WT. OF MIX 5.o t 12 x P11 401 . (Record of neatest 1 /100%) - x I1Wi ((CxP) I SIEVE ANALYSIS OF AGGREGATE SIEVE SIZE CUMULATIVE WEIGHT RETAINED CUMULATIVE WEIGHT PASSING PERCENT PASSING SPEC REMARKS 3/4/ `4 (1) f S4a,3•• /oo '/a T C. 6 1 L 5C C,) 9 6 . 76.6 to - /Oo 75 - 70 3 k AbC6 I') 3 5, ( /`i AI <A. 6 15 51 7 0,6 55 -75 /0 9 50, I 5'R (7,, sr. 3 3o - Va. `D ) ono, 1 a yo, 7 Ic,6 (/ -aI lya3.9 116.ti 7.5" 3o -7.o V - spec. Pars l - DRY WEIGHT OF SAMPLE TECHNICIAN cc /kcb r •RY WEIGHT AFTER WASH /(9'(/.7 SAMPLED BY T,a• MAh.ri 1 REVIEWED BY .,.•,.4(e{ REMARKS: • . ez SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS VARIATION FIELD FROM • DISTANCE DRY FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS TEST ELEV. BELOW MAIL DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. METHOD LOCATION (FEET) GRADE TYPE (PCF) (%) (%) (%) FAIL + so' Snu kt 2 r tv Elk/ r 139 5 6 l 0 P 2. Shtikv 2lver Lc,,, r( 4 I too ' 132.9 4,I `15S P 3 Salu.oL, Rtve.- I� Luc, � P „ t t L)k 3 133.3 6.7 96,1 9 Sulh,oy, River [.utir F,,„ Lo} 161101 132.3 6. I RS P 5 wer Lun mat Lo } 61k22 SAlh,vc ewe 134,1 6.9 96.6 n PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON SPECIFICATION: ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 696 ❑ 90% 0 698 ❑ 95% 0698 ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 ❑ 90% 0 1557 ❑ 90% D 1557 ❑ OTHER ❑ OTHER TEST NUMBER MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) C� .,II / JR�`V y GY. t Base (� S ' Base. 13 W,7 6.7 DT =DENSITY TEST RT = RETEST TEST METHOD N. NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM 0 2937) AGRA E &E Field Rep. (Initials) C O AGRA E&E Project Manager (Initials) Contractor's Rep. Continued ❑ (Initials) I AG R A E arth & Environmental PROJECT NAME g ve)WK Z atAa 3r4 Ada, PROJECT No. 17 - 1311 DATE FIELD REPORT No. Z PAGE Z OF Z vironmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST (%) P /e 331 u/ al k11Aq 4 s t ISI ' 1 , ' w, AG Earth & En 2H /1`3'35 Utl: UL 0 NUCLEAR( RC. BAND CO DC . WAVE CY R ST A ronmental .w Al . rF loot K. la MJt. /OO Q•. s•lw... Cow. At 4 3'0. of an..• TM D M2) 1ASTM D 1666) • R (MOM D293n AGRA E &E Field ep. (Initials) AGRA Earth & Cr MIOmn1 r. Inc. (RAY. 7/94) LOCAT,Qn lw.A too.- %ass: nQ.crtoal..... Y , n 15U '302 d In t 01 t.I.... elK. ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR I` AB D 1SS1 ' OTHER M•I ee Yf\I+ J/ AGRA E &E Pro)eca Manager (Initials AURA E &E,SPUKANE, WA SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS OISTANCE ELEV. BELOW (FEET) GRADE PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM 0 698 MATT TYPE FIELD •DRF DENSITY rocFI MELD MOWS ON FIELD COMP. (%) SPECIFICATION: U 90% o see ❑ :Dn D 1551 PAGE 02 IS • TE TEST No MET 61 /0 TEST NUMB 01 ITENSITY 7 FIT. RETEST TEST MET • @7�L4► Am en- la Ne ; co ve . 1 'u. of w M.t.v .e.. %Ant / E• Mike 5 OF 1«vn aut. lase; )7S' a..c 3 I s• o rut Ye ' w. 0 1.. ...�� is .o 1�r ite wt.- wa.:50 • wTP \•..e • Z. T AX. 54 SKr 4 50. boon IA Le . Iasi -- •,4P t .w. 01.4.A v ass; 30 s .,F ..a t ` .^.4. .tr 4.-4; 1 S 'FT. S. a.k.... Le. F 4 r 11 11 •, ,1 PROJECT No a - 1 11 // —/ 5 9C C. 143.1 Q2. HZ.? ........ Q5 143.5 gZ 7 MLtI. 2•1' 142.7 'Mt wz.9 q7-3 43.1 11.4 06. z� ►Yz.j RELO REPORT ly. C JC PAGE DAILY FIELD REPORT VARIATION FROM OPTIMUM MOIST. I %) �. 195% D 898 ❑ 90%D1557 PASS OR PAIL V OTHER !/SX 94 . •K Contractor's Pep. (Initials) _ . Continued CJ MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. (%) IJ 3 • •µV 4/ 2 a Aft, '. " eAUP eg AAA U,alke - I1�f D 1 � Q -131► a .. a , - Rowe,- FN• @.�NIY n.A-4 &P. DATE s iI �1 S / S PAGE ^ oF R Salw4vt ALt. -1kwr; IS of SaN.wrn.P'.vev- la•.c d S's. of4 " T1 5 N sal. lflvev lave; 17S'E•a{5n Ave /4 . 3's. o rt PROJECT NAME ae IJ PROJECT No. FIELD REPORT Aft, '. " eAUP eg AAA U,alke - I1�f D 1 � Q -131► a .. a , - Rowe,- FN• @.�NIY n.A-4 &P. DATE s iI �1 S / S PAGE ^ oF R ' IJ S Ong lose° sdw.of Gal.,.... l''.vr� /QwbIp AA oft Sat.vtn ot la st_; /00 n Qler !awe J 3'u. oF¢ kv.e 4 i'A►. .4 . 4 Aft, '. " 143.1 14Z.9 193.5 43.1 `12A i73) gri is P 1 a lJ 3 0 II Id Salw4vt ALt. -1kwr; IS of SaN.wrn.P'.vev- la•.c d S's. of4 " T1 5 N sal. lflvev lave; 17S'E•a{5n Ave /4 . 3's. o rt " 1Y3.� 92.1 F 1 , M1/ S'a 'It 'thaw 1awt1 - lo'A).✓ ,a ra..n M,e. 1 7' W. a c 1 E. tNr{.l't. j 1 ., 142. 1 `� Pa? p� �f - Gam ✓ 92.E F P.v p p f -y SWlle eTVc.- \awe A l. • m✓..a All. 4 I,. , 0 ....- 1awe;z .. o ' A ✓4'ttJia..a a >r ". S' E•of t z O. `,. vl,Mt Sal«tA vev "Vt :3o • Y..dAraw Ate. f T'UJ o4 n " IN3.1 W3. l //24 ga l' q Cr 1 1 /� /V id / k f ' lawl� i.S $.0 ��..dl...A l.wc 4 11 1� ('/j r7 cg-2— • I I /4 AG RA Earth & Environmental TEST TEST No. METHOD TEST NUMBER DT DENSITY TEST RT . RETEST TEST METHOD NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) AGRA E &E Field Rep. (Initials) V M AGRA Earth 8 Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS LOCATION ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR AASSTM, O 1557 OTHER Ft Cf j/cry�ly./ AGRA E &E Project Manager (Initials) DISTANCE ELEV. BELOW (FEET) GRADE PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 DAILY FIELD REPORT MATL FIELD I@• DENSITY FIELD MOIST ❑ 90%D1557 Contractors Rep. (Initials) VARIATION FROM FIELD OPTIMUM COMP. MOIST. SPECIFICATION: ❑ 90 %D698 ❑ 95 %D 698 ❑ 90%D 1557 PASS OR }'OTHER 9:0? 77 44 te Continued ❑ i AGRA SUMMARY TEST TEST No. METHOD LOCATION OF FIELD COMPACTION SQIN4N L^• •R r TEST ELEV. RESULTS DISTANCE BELOW GRADE MATT- TYPE 4 /t. FIELD •EI• DENSITY (PCF) 143.1 FIELD MOIST. (%) FIELD COMP. (%) VARIATION FROM OPTIMUM MOIST. (%) PASS OR FAIL (FEET) 1 /kJ .>_ t .. Aar* A p/vcV 14 QMGJ s0 awe - ICA)• ort n °7 iJ 5alw.e.• glut. 14 Nt'' )00'e. 3..1•.w M dub IA we 13'. . o .' 142.7 3 0 6 %#^4 4, tenet' n tenet' N 14 e; act, 'ff. o Gat, lel.tr Iw..e et7'A) a4 11 11 1213,5 -t 43.1 q kJ wlny, es, tie -l )6 'E• o-F 5a"e Aver la .,,t ¢ S's • O T r pwt ¢ S + ' N 1.....1�YVev lave; 17S'E•o>45alnv. Aver 4..e .� A VS-04 . 4 " j1 1H3. 14z,7 W Iv _ Swa Ye have., 1a-t; 10 A) •4 1T0.Nn A. ' U.). O r C E. (AVIINI•A., 6 dte Qa..tr\ay.e ; 5o7A • •c-r—La..a At. 4 s Y � 1 e j1 1 9 W3 / . 5( q 1 .,. Lave,- %ae z . o'A). of Tv.,1Ta:.a q.e. t ' E•o� J .a A. d aloha = ye.) s..A- tJfA. ae W3.i u.04 - 1• Id ki �V 42.144,401/4 42 .14 4, 401/4 -,F (lQ. - Iq NQ; 1 S o+ X,dla.a JUG ! ' oL 1 1 IYz.7 TEST NUMBER 2922) 0 1556) (ASTM D 2937) (Initials) T AGRA E PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM ST01557 I to P1151 OTHER ? )J ON: SPECIFICATION: ❑ 90% D 698 ❑ 90% D 1557 OTHER ❑ 95 %0698 ❑ 90% D 11557 Q 77 Ot /a ce / MATERIAL REFERENCE TYPE SAMPLE No. MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) /n' R, � (r�' � WCLZ I Qµy co DENSITY TEST RT = RETEST TEST METHOD NUCLEAR (ASTM D SC = SAND CONE (ASTM DC = DRIVE CYLINDER E &E Field Rep. &E Project Manager (Initials) Contractoes Rep. (Initials) Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME f L I w1. u ) n W.- a 1/4A t .a � [�11 - . 4Q ^ i �'Ml•. PROJECT No. 1 —13 / r} DATE �, J' / FIELD REPORTJ°. Q J PAGE R OF R Ro v veV H9 ' ` .--i -" n .LQ /` e. = / _AGRA art & Environmental mental, I nc. (Rev. 7A DAILY FIELD REPORT ...E * ' LA BORATORYDATA .�.� .r' :it . ..' , � 1 DATE SPECIMANS CAST DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED LAB ID No. TEST DATE FIELD CURE AGE (DAYS) SIZE (114) AREA (30114) WEIGHT (LBS) MAX LOAD (LBS) STRENGTH (PSI) SET No. LAB TECH ,3% ► c 43 (dill � S /a r 6x12 0 , 70 9V C I ri 3WD CUM Ofl OWNER c�9 3 c GENERAL GENERAL CONTRACTOR 1al!4 g2r DESIGN STRENGTH 3 an O P51 0 c2$ DAYS 0 UNGROUTED SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS Li t / TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED L / t . / YOS OTHER AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS 6 x, LOAD SIZE / n YDS3 REMARKS . �' FIELD DATA . . SUPPl1Eq ( � Q I MIX No. 7C PLANT G LC No. 9.0 ❑JOB MIX �NCRETE 0 GROUT MORTAR FLEX BEAMS PRISMS • GROUTED PRQJF. No / 1/4 /// ! ! . TEMP. (Deg. 9 . YIELD/UNIT TIME - TRUCK No TICKET No. X AIR SLUMP CONC AIR WEIGHT p :5 � S /a sl3/ 1/4.5A , � 70 y6 ''ii �= CUM Ofl OWNER k 3 c GENERAL GENERAL CONTRACTOR DESIGN STRENGTH 3 an O P51 0 c2$ DAYS 0 UNGROUTED SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS Li t / TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED L / t . / YOS OTHER AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS 6 x, LOAD SIZE / n YDS3 PROJECT NAME /2 1 ,3 A A 1 9 . 'A_1.�.V)l.(JIQ/ PRQJF. No / 1/4 /// ! ! TEST REPQRT Np U V —J � LOCATION R ‘40./L I 01 DATTI.. /6 . PAGE OF /// ��� ( / le ENGINEER ARCHITECT PERMIT NUMBER W�E�A - '^ O M 4 ''ii �= CUM Ofl OWNER k 3 c GENERAL GENERAL CONTRACTOR AG RA E art h & Environmental ❑ FOOTINGS ❑ WALLS ❑ COLUMNS 0 GRADE BEAMS ECK sue 9 PILINGS ❑ OTHER INSPECTOR REVIEWED BY Reviewed by AGRA Earth & Environmental. Inc. (Rev: 11/94) GRIDS 5La. ✓alfps 0f a .a A-at_ REMARKS REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. l P Date ( MATERIAL TEST REPOR CEMENT TYPE ❑ DESIGN MIX No. GEM LBS. F ASH LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. SAND LBS. H2O LBS. ',REPORTEDBATQH DATA ADMIXTURES AIR ENT WATER ADDED OZ/CWT ❑ ACTU BT LBS.' AT e ALL,REMS INSPECTED' ARE: FORMING NON - CONFORMING G M TEST OD ASTM C 39 AASHTO T22 9 OTHER (Speedy) Le: COMPRESSIVE FLEXURAL ❑ CONFORMING ❑ NON- CONFORMIN . TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED ` TYPE OF STRUCTURE INSPECTED • RESTEEL 0 STRUCTURAL STEEL FABRICATION El FOOTINGS AUGER CAST PILING GRADE BEAMS WALLS ❑ OTHER (spney) 0 COLUMNS Rtc.A;ON -GRADE STRUCTURAL GRADE POST TENSIONED SLAB 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE ❑ STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION • REINFORCED MASONRY EXPANSION BOLTS SHOTCRETE FIRE PROOFING OTHER(Specify) CCNC2y ' •' i1_ PROJECT NAME < , k ^ /� /`/ d /� � _t .�.� _./ l PROJECT µO / / ^�� FIELD RSPORtJO. rf LOCATION Z rsa_A_La o i ' •' i1_ U / ( / / /\ 7 PA PERMIT NUMBER —i ER ) CLIENT OR OWNER F ^ / / / n^ , ) ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR // ARCHITECT CONCRETE SUPPLIER Ar A e rt4 MIX x 190 • MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. 0 e .) , SLUMP (IN.) 's ` it • AIR CONTENT 6-7 DESIGN STRENGTH (P51) S No OF SAMPLES `' 6,//c) C /t.. L TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED C i CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) l G TIME S%A 3d Am /,+rer 4. AIR TEMP. 46- 0 6t AGRA / Earth & Environmental 7) SPECIFIC LOCATION(S) GRIDS REMARKS A :,4 CONTINUED ❑ ❑ YES 0 ALL-ITEMS ABOVE WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPROVED PLANS IF NO, EXPLAIN LI S Inspector ills . AGRA Earth 8� onlal, Inc. (Rev, 11/94) MATERIAL FIELD REPORT GROUT SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (P51) No. OF SAMPLES SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPOR .. GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED TIME AIR TEMP. TYPE OF MO ATERIAL TEST REPO SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED ORTAR TEMP. (Deg F.) MORTAR TIME AIR TEMP. Date . :, CONCRETE . FIELD REPORT No. 127 PAGE a OF 3 SUPPLIER Accn MIX II - 7 ( ii(J k MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. O 3 THER P ec.oae..aV CLIENT OR OW NE , r ,1a(-Ey SLUMP (IN.) c4 Va AIR CONTENT 6-, U DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) MORTAR TEMP. (Deg F.) 3E6 3 No. OF SAMPLES 3 AIR TEMP. TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED 3 0 CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) `7O TIME I,. 0 O AIR TEMP. (Da0 PROJECT NAME nn f f K[ c2A.D p di e 47 CA) PROJECT No. /a -l3 // FIELD REPORT No. 127 PAGE a OF 3 LOCATION DATE // -/7 - PERMIT NUMBEfl THER P ec.oae..aV CLIENT OR OW NE , r ,1a(-Ey ARCHITECT r.4-1944 GENERAL CONTRACTOfl C PVICTUl A-) SPECIFIC LOCATION(S) GRIDS aAS/Lr7L° /fin ttA0D(c.Tp�P m�S Farr. 77ff i,UTfR.sECrIa,us c9F - TuaiANA AVE F 5-Acme,...) 2toet_ Ale_ AJa /- 4WrJ'aiL cAp_gAnps Pent - LUDrRNA A SNAKE 21OF1z, LA LIE • trolresrr n N.1 AG RA arth & Environmental TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED ❑ RESTEEL ❑ STRUCTURAL STEEL FABRICATION ❑ REINFORCED CONCRETE ❑ STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION ❑ REINFORCED MASONRY ❑ EXPANSION BOLTS ❑ SHOTCRETE ❑ FIRE PROOFING Ekl OTHER (Specify) SY DE LJAtC 4IEMARKS ALL &EMS ABOVE.WERE IN CONFORMANCE WRH BUILDING DEPARTMENTAPPROVED PLANS ❑ YES ❑ NO Inspector IF NO, EXPLAIN AGRA Eanti 8 Environmental, Inc. (Rev, 11/94) ❑ FOOTINGS ❑ COLUMNS ❑ AUGER CAST PILING ❑ SLAB-ON-GRADE ❑ GRADE BEAMS ❑ STRUCTURAL GRADE ❑ WALLS ❑ POST TENSIONED SLAB IN OTHER (Specify) S7PE WALK- SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME Date C!_ MATERIAL FIELD REPORT TYPE OF STRUCTURE INSPECTED TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED GROUT AIR TEMP. CONTINUED ❑ MORTAR TYPE OF MORTAR MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED MORTAR TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME AIR TEMP. AG RA arth & Environmental TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED ❑ RESTEEL ❑ STRUCTURAL STEEL FABRICATION ❑ REINFORCED CONCRETE ❑ STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION ❑ REINFORCED MASONRY ❑ EXPANSION BOLTS ❑ SHOTCRETE ❑ FIRE PROOFING Ekl OTHER (Specify) SY DE LJAtC 4IEMARKS ALL &EMS ABOVE.WERE IN CONFORMANCE WRH BUILDING DEPARTMENTAPPROVED PLANS ❑ YES ❑ NO Inspector IF NO, EXPLAIN AGRA Eanti 8 Environmental, Inc. (Rev, 11/94) ❑ FOOTINGS ❑ COLUMNS ❑ AUGER CAST PILING ❑ SLAB-ON-GRADE ❑ GRADE BEAMS ❑ STRUCTURAL GRADE ❑ WALLS ❑ POST TENSIONED SLAB IN OTHER (Specify) S7PE WALK- SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME Date C!_ MATERIAL FIELD REPORT TYPE OF STRUCTURE INSPECTED TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED GROUT AIR TEMP. CONTINUED ❑ ` t EI ELD DATA SUPPLIER ACsne I MIX No. 190{0 I PLANT No. C2p ❑ JOG MIX Q .-CONCRETE . GROUT • MORTAR ❑ FLEX BEAMS ❑ PRISMS • GROUTED ❑ UNGROUTED OTHER 3 OF 3 TEMP. (Dog. F) YIELD/UNIT TIME TRUCK No. TICKET No. %AIR SLUMP CONC AIR WEIGHT / : so 513o 43343 s..o 1.0 70 (Da [� F •� d •'f �•' � ASTM C 39 ❑ MSHTOT22 II OTHER (Specily) ( ( iS 'T7( 07$ DESIGN STRENGTH Ito PSI ® a ir DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS 4 L' TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED 30 YDS AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS 4 5 - 4 7 3 LOAD SIZE 1 0 YDS3 ROJECT / 7A4 ' a4tD p au) Az:0ino,-) PROJECT No. la-I31/ TEST REPORT No. 1 0 Q LOCATION DATE `(_ 17-45- PAGE 3 OF 3 FIELD CURE PERMIT NUMBER ER CLIENT OR OWNER // lEAO F T'' �,1u.15 6S� ENGINEER STRENGTH (PSI) GENERAL CONTRACTOR / 04ntenaA ARCHITECT TEST METHOD ' 4 ryit rk F� S!Y 1.. • .`FYJ 4f'h ` ; LABO � RATORYtpATA , 4' x rv�T.V. i1+P � 4 N.v1 •. DATE SPECIMANS CAST DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED LAB ID TEST FIELD CURE AGE (DAYS) SIZE (IN) AREA (SO IN) WEIGHT (LBS) (LBS) MAX LOAD ()BS) STRENGTH (PSI) SET No. LAB TECH TEST METHOD ��jj��No�. X70(! / DATE 1^ ( & c ( - 0)a- !b [� F •� d •'f �•' � ASTM C 39 ❑ MSHTOT22 II OTHER (Specily) ( ( iS 'T7( 07$ ( (' '�� ® COMPRESSIVE FLEXURAL ❑ CONFORMING ■ NON - CONFORMING REMARKS • r AG R A t h & Environmental 'PLACEMENT AREA ❑ FOOTINGS ❑ WALLS ID COLUMNS ❑ GRADE BEAMS ❑ SLAB/DECK ❑ SLAB ❑ PIUNGS la OTHER INSPECTOR / p 2N-1 pn- REVIEWED BY Reviewed by (+ AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) GRIDS I HAAJD,e P ai * s - Ar _.L slot) eusw (duce ALIL= a1DLAAc AlJO A4ct eL IWU ! AUF /AJTFPflIAUS • REMARKS REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. Date / 1-2 7 MATERIAL TEST REPORT REPORTED BATCH DATA CEMENT TYPE ❑ DESIGN MIX No. CEM LBS. F ASH LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. SAND LBS. H2O LBS. ❑ ACTUAL ADMIXTURES AIR ENT OZ/CWT WATER ADDED BT LBS. AT CONFORMING ❑ NON - CONFORMING LBS. ALL ITEMS INSPECTED ARE: • PROJECT NAME itl VC I t REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM SAMPLE No DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) ( %) MATERIAL TYPE 1 21(5" La .5-6 Cour 9 I3 $t ? / MOIST. 6.7 P P P I P P Z N 1/_� cif 6 0�//✓ L c s e.�l I L O o } I I 128.5 Il.� 1 42 s '76 / iZ.b 9412 J,o 13,0 loca 1 I 3 N c P &Lull R . L�1�/ D45C rock I rlt__ 4- N /4) i r • PROJECT NAME itl VC I t W4 It 2 q 4 " 3 A' JCI1 PROJECT /2-1311/ DATE 3 N FIELD FE 2 PAGE TNO. OF Z 15;2 5z4 / /V - tti 1 in Rtvtr Lt40)YCtt4€ kw foci I, 0 - b I 132.1 ) zt 1 5,4 47 7 15;2 5z4 L — - - — P P P I P P Z N 1/_� cif 6 0�//✓ L c s e.�l I L O o } I I 128.5 Il.� 1 42 s '76 / iZ.b 9412 J,o 13,0 loca 1 I 3 N c P &Lull R . L�1�/ D45C rock I rlt__ 4- N /4) i r S Al I I 6 0 1 121, I 128,1 13`12.x_ U N II AGRA /Earth & Environmental 7 TEST TEST No. METHOD OT = DENSITY TEST RT = RETEST TEST METHOD N = NUCLEAR (ASTM 0 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) AGRA Earth 8. Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 7/94) SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS 4' N LOCATION PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON: • ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 ❑ OTHER AGRA ESE Field Rep. (Initials) AGRA E &E Project Manager (Initials) DISTANCE ELEV. BELOW (FEET) GRADE DAILY FIELD REPORT MATL TYPE FIELD DRY DENSITY (PCF) FIELD MOIST ( %) Contractor's Rep. (Initials) FIELD COMP. ( %) SPECIFICATION: VARIATION FROM OPTIMUM MOIST. 1 %) E / 9O /fig D698 ❑ 95 %D698 L'] qr. D 1557 ❑ 90%D 1559 ❑ OTHER PASS OR FAIL Continued ❑ TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED TYPE OF STRUCTURE INSPECTED RESTEEL 9 REINFORCED CONCRETE REINFORCED MASONRY U SHOTCRETE ,, nn OTHER (Specify) CO IA (('�t -'t€ 9 STRUCTURAL STEEL FABRICATION 0 STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION ❑ EXPANSION BOLTS 9 ARE PROOFING Afro in / it 0Ad MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. 0 COLUMNS N SLAB-ON -GRADE 9 STRUCTURAL GRADE 9 POST TENSIONED SLAB I. FOOTINGS II, AUGER CAST PILING 9 GRADE BEAMS ❑ WALLS ❑ OTHER (Specify) G. YX -04 ,t( AIR CONTENT 7, LI No. OF SAMPLES DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) 500 0 TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED 'rCONCRETE ''MORTAR TYPE OF MORTAR MIX* 4 3 ii MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. 0 (,1 SLUMP (IN.) PERMIT NUMBER DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) G. YX -04 ,t( AIR CONTENT 7, LI No. OF SAMPLES DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) 500 0 TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED - MORTAR TEMP. (Deg F.) TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED Ci 0 , TIME AIR TEMP. 'rCONCRETE GROUT BLS SUPPLIER CP hn MIX* 4 3 ii MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. 0 (,1 SLUMP (IN.) PERMIT NUMBER SLUMP (IN.) & (w COT G. YX -04 ,t( AIR CONTENT 7, LI T� /b DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) 500 0 No. OF SAMPLES 3 - GROUT TEMP. (Dog F.) TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED Ci 0 , TIME AIR TEMP. CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) 6 Z I r TIME iQ '-Z 3' AIR TEMP. 6 PROJECT NAME gt VWullC GROUT BLS SUPPLIER LOCATION D G .Q j kdiNa. g4 ✓I(F: ln MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. PAGE Z O F 3 SLUMP (IN.) PERMIT NUMBER DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) CLIENT OR OWNER p ew: £ ilea rSki No. OF SAMPLES GENERAL CONTRACTOR CC TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED - GROUT TEMP. (Dog F.) LAI LL,;vcw4 CP eve ✓S frW. A/C SG A L--IK(E) TIME AIR TEMP. PROJECT NAME gt VWullC PROJECT No IZ- 13 II FIELD REPORT No. 2.9 LOCATION D G .Q j kdiNa. g4 ✓I(F: ln DATE,/ I / 1 b ` G PAGE Z O F 3 PERMIT NUMBER WEATHER 60 (Ifo r CLIENT OR OWNER p ew: £ ilea rSki ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR CC ARCHITECT SPECIFIC LOCATION(S) YES NO GRIDS s!1!W.(' v, ")V/V G1 Ind .� Ind / IA Y/ N • 9,n REMARKS 1i J ti C IC 7 / + /\ vii 17 l sor, 13 LAI LL,;vcw4 CP eve ✓S frW. A/C SG A L--IK(E) CONTINUED fil— OtEM5ABOD WERE IA$ONFORMANC BUILDINGDEiMR7MEiekti3OVED;PL R YES NO IF NO, EXPLAIN 9,n AG RA arth & Environmental Inspector AGRA Eodh & Ern /momenta!, Inc. (Rev. 1194) I A,11 s MATERIAL FIELD REPORT Date Y l r' b UC -L.R4 I a VI 14 1 FIELD DATA SUPPLIER clop,- I MIX No. L.4 3 I I PLANT No. 3 9 JOB MIX tO CONCRETE • GROUT 0 MORTAR ❑ FLEX BEAMS PRISMS • GROUTED UNGROUTED MI OTHER LOCATION II 1 /� ( lP €Na coth .o s Rlv' t. e TEMP. (Deg. F) YIELD/UNIT TIME TRUCK No. WEATHER 40 rlPa % AIR SLUMP CONC AIR WEIGHT !OtZS ? I ' TICKKETNo.. IJS 1 7,4 6 Y9 6Z 60 /C 7 6 0 ./247.6 l i Dl_ I. ASTM C 39 0 AASHTO T22 9 OTHER (Specify) 514 Olt 1OV 605" 5 o DESIGN STRENGTH 300 0 PSI 0 Z. g DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS G 7 TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED ,0 1 I YDS AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS / 0 0 / WAD SIZE 1 t YDS 4 PROJECT NAME r 1rogVwaIK PROJECT No 12'1 TEST REPORT No. O LOCATION II 1 /� ( lP €Na coth .o s Rlv' t. e �"tIIY-Iy6 PAGE 3 OF 3 AGE (DAYS) PERMIT NUMBER WEATHER 40 rlPa CLIENT OR OWNER bectk R W- awstey ENGINES -i 1 STRENGTH ( PSI) I CV .,'T.T1- o GXO L.+ GENERAL CONTRACTOR K ARCHITECT LABORATORY DATA DATE SPECIMANS CAST L/ / /q 6 DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED LAB ID o. N CC TEST DATE FIELD CURE AGE (DAYS) SIZE AREA (SO IN) WEIGHT (LOS) MAX LOAD (LOSS) STRENGTH ( PSI) SET No. LAB TECH TEST METHOD rr 35 ( / / 61 q `R L Z hot (: /C 7 6 0 ./247.6 l i Dl_ I. ASTM C 39 0 AASHTO T22 9 OTHER (Specify) 514 Olt 1OV 605" 5 o ) S {� Ais `I � L CS � L L t 3 0 D L El COMPRESSIVE 9 FLEXURAL 9 CONFORMING NONCONFORMING REMARKS 7 // /1 / 4/-i- / C� �/ rn / d' A. / A /r,k 74 /1 �9 /Z day SIT-- 7 2 5D AG RA rth & Environmental PLACEMENT AREA 9 FOOTINGS , WALLS PI ❑ COLUMNS 9 GRADE BEAMS SLAB/DECK SLAB 9 PILINGS OTHER INSPECTOR GRIDS REMARKS REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. Z9 O cin1 a_ REVIEWED BY Reviewed by 1 ` 6 / AGRA Earth A EnvirownenIN, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) ( cP - &--( Date Y/ll 5ler MATERIAL TEST REPORT CEMENT TYPE 7T ❑ DESIGN MIX No. CEM LBS. F ASH LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. SAND LBS. H2O LBS. '-131 G, REPORTED BATCH DATA ADMIXTURES . 4 - i A AIR ENT OZ/CWT 6vh7 WATER ADDED ❑ ACTUAL I LQ BT LBS. AT AU. ITEMS INSPECTED ARE: CONFORMING D NON - CONFORMING LBS. 1 SPECIFIC LOCATION(S) TYPE OF STRUCTURE INSPECTED RESTEEL REINFORCED CONCRETE GRIDS S[, R)vn ONE I jih N CA U COLUMNS M SLAB-ON -GRADE STRUCTURAL GRADE POST TENSIONED SLAB ■ REINFORCED MASONRY U SHOTCRETE OTHER(Specify) CVN(�,� III WALLS U OTHER (Specif)) ' EMARKS I 6 C 7 lc i / 1I T A C + 1 A CJ 1 1� se- 2 N; Co Vv(vs NW,A/E SG �f ry,µ.clKSE) VM (ItivC CONTINUED TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED TYPE OF STRUCTURE INSPECTED RESTEEL REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURAL STEEL FABRICATION STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION ❑ EXPANSION BOLTS U FIRE PROOFING AOVD N/ "ORLI U FOOTINGS AUGER CAST PILING ❑ GRADE BEAMS U COLUMNS M SLAB-ON -GRADE STRUCTURAL GRADE POST TENSIONED SLAB ■ REINFORCED MASONRY U SHOTCRETE OTHER(Specify) CVN(�,� III WALLS U OTHER (Specif)) 4 - ROJECT NAME PROJECT No FIELD REPORT No. gt a?vw -ll lc 1) z Ia- 13 1 LOCATION 4✓ 14 6l 11 lNv % DATE 1 /LI ' el b PAGE , OF PERMIT NUMBER WEATHER 60 ( I f 0 S CLIENT OR OWNER pp ENGINEER 0 eet.0 N hta0/S le GENERAL CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT e.-C. e.-C. %t"t MORTAR TYPE OF MORTAR MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED MORTAR TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME AIR TEMP. G NCRETE SUPPLIER (f k MIX p Li 3/ I MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. 0 SLUMP (IN.) hI/ I (weal (weal 4 -04 r T(f )LAIR CONTENT 71 I ?, DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) 300 0 —1 No. OF SAMPLES 3 TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED °!0. 1 CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) 61.g TIME / Z r AIR TEMP. to G ROUT ' " SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME AIR TEMP. AG R A y jth & Environmental YES NO ALC.FrEl02059:actiltiircpyikiiiiiiitAticttiferii BUILDINdDEPA(iTMENT; PFROVEDPLANS ' IF NO, EXPLAIN Inspector f, �` L_ AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) Luvv/ ,Ills ( - 151(- Date MATERIAL FIELD REPORT /1406, 9xi_yc,z6 %t"t MORTAR TYPE OF MORTAR MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED MORTAR TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME AIR TEMP. G NCRETE SUPPLIER (f k MIX p Li 3/ I MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. 0 SLUMP (IN.) hI/ I (weal (weal 4 -04 r T(f )LAIR CONTENT 71 I ?, DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) 300 0 —1 No. OF SAMPLES 3 TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED °!0. 1 CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) 61.g TIME / Z r AIR TEMP. to G ROUT ' " SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME AIR TEMP. AG R A y jth & Environmental YES NO ALC.FrEl02059:actiltiircpyikiiiiiiitAticttiferii BUILDINdDEPA(iTMENT; PFROVEDPLANS ' IF NO, EXPLAIN Inspector f, �` L_ AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) Luvv/ ,Ills ( - 151(- Date MATERIAL FIELD REPORT /1406, 9xi_yc,z6 G NCRETE SUPPLIER (f k MIX p Li 3/ I MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. 0 SLUMP (IN.) hI/ I (weal (weal 4 -04 r T(f )LAIR CONTENT 71 I ?, DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) 300 0 —1 No. OF SAMPLES 3 TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED °!0. 1 CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) 61.g TIME / Z r AIR TEMP. to G ROUT ' " SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME AIR TEMP. AG R A y jth & Environmental YES NO ALC.FrEl02059:actiltiircpyikiiiiiiitAticttiferii BUILDINdDEPA(iTMENT; PFROVEDPLANS ' IF NO, EXPLAIN Inspector f, �` L_ AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) Luvv/ ,Ills ( - 151(- Date MATERIAL FIELD REPORT /1406, 9xi_yc,z6 G ROUT ' " SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME AIR TEMP. AG R A y jth & Environmental YES NO ALC.FrEl02059:actiltiircpyikiiiiiiitAticttiferii BUILDINdDEPA(iTMENT; PFROVEDPLANS ' IF NO, EXPLAIN Inspector f, �` L_ AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) Luvv/ ,Ills ( - 151(- Date MATERIAL FIELD REPORT /1406, 9xi_yc,z6 AG R A y jth & Environmental YES NO ALC.FrEl02059:actiltiircpyikiiiiiiitAticttiferii BUILDINdDEPA(iTMENT; PFROVEDPLANS ' IF NO, EXPLAIN Inspector f, �` L_ AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) Luvv/ ,Ills ( - 151(- Date MATERIAL FIELD REPORT /1406, 9xi_yc,z6 FIELD DATA SUPPLIER c n MIX No. (.4 3 I PLANT No. 3 JOB MIX • f R CONCRETE U GROUT MORTAR FLEX BEAMS PRISMS GROUTED D UNGROUTED ❑ OTHER ❑ ACTUAL TEMP. (Deg. F) YIELD/UNIT TIME TRUCK No. TICKET No. % AIR SLUMP CONC AIR WEIGHT J IO:ZS 94 9 7s52•0 7,4 b 19 b Z 60 T SAND LBS. ,) /o ,ob�) ( 1 k 7 S S p 5 ?h(b L 9O ` 13 0 H2O LBS. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IC C • TM 39 ❑AASHTO Li OTHER (Specify) ADMIXTURES 4-&Vt S `� AIR ENT OZ/CWT 6 L/ a Z WATER ADDED BT LBS. AT LBS. DESIGN STRENGTH S PSI 1 Z DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS G 7 TOTAL CU: YDS. PLACED G r ' YDS AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS / C 0 7, LOAD SIZE 1 ' YDS REPORTED BATCH DATA CEMENT TYPE jr DESIGN ❑ ACTUAL MIX No, 4 1 3 LOCATION I I (/ Ih /II aLIA AN a >Oti("AO, CEM LBS. G 2 v y AREA (SO IN) F ASH LBS. PAGE 3 OF 3 STRENGTH (PSI) C AGG LBS. LAB TECH TEST METHOD C AGG LBS. WEATHER 6n r.la«r CLIENT OR OWNER Death 2, E+iwsLey C AGG LBS. ENGINEE • T SAND LBS. ,) /o ,ob�) ( 1 k 7 S S p 5 ?h(b L 9O ` 13 0 H2O LBS. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IC C • TM 39 ❑AASHTO Li OTHER (Specify) ADMIXTURES 4-&Vt S `� AIR ENT OZ/CWT 6 L/ a Z WATER ADDED BT LBS. AT LBS. ;PROJECT NAME I�(VBV Wen-1K_ DATE SPECIMANS CAST 4/11 /q 6 DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED PROJECT No, ' Z - ( I ' TEST REPORT No. C LOCATION I I (/ Ih /II aLIA AN a >Oti("AO, /� 2LVe(/ LA v.., SIZE (IN) AREA (SO IN) DA 4 /4- /y6 PAGE 3 OF 3 STRENGTH (PSI) SET No. LAB TECH TEST METHOD PERMIT NUMBER WEATHER 6n r.la«r CLIENT OR OWNER Death 2, E+iwsLey "7 ENGINEE • T 11 ,) /o ,ob�) ( 1 k 7 S S p 5 ?h(b L 9O ` 13 0 L 0 VL.. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IC C • TM 39 ❑AASHTO Li OTHER (Specify) ARCHITECT S `� kkj; i. 4 ; "',x, LABORATORY DATA DATE SPECIMANS CAST 4/11 /q 6 DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED LAB ID No. TEST / DATE FIELD CURE AGE (DAYS) SIZE (IN) AREA (SO IN) WEIGHT (LBS) MAX LOAD (LB S) STRENGTH (PSI) SET No. LAB TECH TEST METHOD r 3S( / grit( "7 ✓ Z 4I`( ,) /o ,ob�) ( 1 k 7 S S p 5 ?h(b L 9O ` 13 0 C TE DL D L • TM 39 ❑AASHTO Li OTHER (Specify) S `� y c7153- }D COMPRESSIVE FLEXURAL CONFORMING NON-CONFORMING REMARKS � -7- 7 ( �/ �'" � 7 494./ "v /L 94 y /9 /Z(7 `hw ,q 7 ;17 /!C( G h & Environmental PLACEMENT AREA FOOTINGS 0 WALLS COLUMNS f ❑ GRADE BEAMS L i SLAB/DECK yl SLAB 0 PILINGS ❑ OTHER INSPECTOR GRIDS REMARKS REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. y afroda_ Reviewed by C/_ AGRA Earth 8 Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 1154) REVIEWED BY rc,t- n qn MATERIAL TEST REPORT ALL ITEMS INSPECTED ARE: CONFORMING 0 NON - CONFORMING Date ( fi l l S l r TYPE OF 1t*ECTION PERFORMED TYPE OF STRUCTURE INSPECTED [] RESTEEL 0 BTRUCrurva sTEEl. FABRICATION 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION 0 REINFORCED MASONRY 0 EXPANSION BOLTS 0 SHOTCRETE 0 FIREPROOFING [ OTHER (SpKRT) CON Wilk AfiOh /Itoq 0 FOOTINGS ❑ AUGER CAST PILING 0 GRADE BEAMS ❑ WALLS LJ OTHER (Sp.NF) LOCATION �e • COLUMNS rg SLABM GRADE n STRUCTURAL GRADE 0 POST TENSIONED SLAB PACE ... 3 .._ Z . WEATHER 60 CI(4 r PROJECT NAME RT (rvw «� K PROJECT l y FIELD REPORT No 2 4 LOCATION �e Wm-- - 0 /N / 9 b 11TE ... -_ PERMIT NUMBER .' PACE ... 3 .._ Z . WEATHER 60 CI(4 r TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED q 0 . 1 CUENT OR OWNER newt, e ML gW s)(y ENGINEER _-' GENERAL CONTR C ARCHITECT IlibtarrE SUPRIER ST / F het MAp I.1 a E / El /J - ' /- MATERIAL TEST Ot T REPOSNO. t SLUMP (N.) � I (won G -OR ,I(YXAIR CONTENT �J L C � DESIGN STRENGTH(PEI) 8000 No OF SAMPLES F TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED q 0 . 1 CONCRETE TEMP. (D.E P,) b 2 • F TIME /Q . Z r AIR TEMP. 6 0 AO R Earth & Env►ronmental GRIDS Sr REMARKS I 61 sort Z NO 05/1996 13:14 15094820202 Ic (t+9iA 1.41(14,- 044 co Oyer) A'W, SG/EM ,PICSE) ALLf ES MOOIWOPRAIRCE BWTM WIC OSP APPROVED NAPS IF NO. EXPLAIN IDBpeLTp Vs d,-. ADM EMT 4 EA1YMNlE11M. Inc (Rot 11/94) SPECIFIC LOCATION(S) AGRA E &E,SPOKANE, WA PAGE 02 SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPORT NO _ _ SLUMP (IN.) — .. - -_ DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED GROUT TEMP. (Dog F.) TIME TYPE OF MORTAR MATERIAL TEST REPORT No SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED MORTAR TEMP. (DOE F.) TIME oRTB L(/4 �1 h Luvv/ vnllls (in-La4o w o 6 . A)f 1 -41�2b MATERIAL FIELD REPORT GROUT MORTAR AIR TEMP. AIR TEMP. CONTINUED Li MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) A-' (. aisc Ar, •R:2n (eta s-sr 138. - 7 6, - 7 .7 AG RA rth & Environmental PROJECTNAME I tA: I K ? � . q . .1,frr, s 11 ` Tv, M] n -.4 F�� tom- • C7�) />VLL V r. t TEST No. TEST METHOD TEST NUMBER a DENSITY TEST RT = RETEST AGRA Earth 8 Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 7/94) • SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS LOCATION SctirY..t.. - e\ „nr S:Tt ‘e4w Iw•.c; e.k�- 5w Co rye 4- 1,2f ; e .. { - 'e 5f C."..er 4 A-4 -..]sue 5rctL TEST METHOD NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 ❑ OTHER AGRA E &E Field Rep. (Initials) AGRA E &E Project Manager (Initials) DISTANCE ELEV. BELOW MAT”, (FEET) GRADE TYPE DAILY FIELD REPORT PROJECT No. FIELD REPORT No. / 47— t:3 // .; G DATE PAGE L /- - 2 — /G 1 OF `\ FIELD DRY DENSITY (PCF) A3e_ 13(.7 Z (3.3..9 7eWy is Z.! t35.0I3,7 41,3 2.8 / 1340 l. S 94.1 =!•'Z FIELD MOIST. ( %) SPECIFICATION: ❑ 90% D 698 ❑ 90%D 1557 ❑ OTHER L Contractors Rep. (Initials)..f— FIELD COMP (%) VARIATION FROM OPTIMUM MOIST. ( %) PASS OR FAIL 7 ❑ 95 %D696 ❑ 90%D 1557 F' P Continued ❑ TEST TEST No. METHOD SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS VARIATION FIELD FROM • DISTANCE DRY FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS ELEV. BELOW MAIL DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR LOCATION (FEET) GRADE TYPE (PCF) ( %) (%) ( %) FAIL FIELD REPORT No. 31 /✓ 4Io11 ct.✓b 3O' Fw1.•. S. evd — s;dek.Alk D d 1 131.1; S,0 9s,) -,.7 p TEST NUMBER 2922) D 1556) (ASTM D 2937)) (Initials) ""� PERCENT ❑ STANDARD X MODIFIED COMPACTION BASED PROCTOR ASTM D 698 PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 ON: SPECIFICATION: ❑ 90% D 698 ❑ 90% D 1557 ❑ OTHER ❑ 95% 0 698 °l 95', D 1557 • OTHER MATERIAL REFERENCE TYPE SAMPLE No. MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) I 1 I L, cc L (l"G S a1.47&MI vet /38.7 DT =DENSITY TEST RT. RETEST TEST METHOD N at NUCLEAR (ASTM D SC. SAND CONE (ASTM DC. DRIVE CYLINDER AGRA E &E Field Rep. &E Project Manager (Initials) 13/9- Contractor's Rep. (Initials) Continued ❑ AGRA E PROJECT NAME IZ)VCIA/6. PROJECT No. !i_- FIELD REPORT No. 31 DATE . Z ,,( 1 L PAGE � � I I OF I AG RA arth & Environmental AGRA Earth S En*ronmontal, Inc. (Rev.,T94) DAILY FIELD REPORT TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED TYPE OF STRUCTURE INSPECTED FIELD REPORT No. S I PAGE 2 (/ `J OF - 7 _ WEATHER 6 " h L) ?c - ✓ STRUCTURAL STEEL FABRICATION STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION ❑ EXPANSION BOLTS FIRE PROOFING ❑ FOOTINGS ❑ AUGER CAST PILING O GRADE BEAMS D WALLS n OTHER (Specify) ■ RESTEEL COLUMNS REINFORCED CONCRETE REINFORCED MASONRY �■l I I N SLAB-ON-GRADE 5 ICIC W(.I I K ❑ STRUCTURAL GRADE u POST TENSIONED SLAB ■ SHOTCRETE / cify OTHER (Spe) 1 e h% i TOTAL CU YA PLACED _ GR EMP. (Dog F.) PROJECT NAME R 1 se vw01 lc PROJECT No. j7 -1311 FIELD REPORT No. S I PAGE 2 (/ `J OF - 7 _ WEATHER 6 " h L) ?c - ✓ LOCATION DATE Llin /Gl I; PERMIT NUMBER ENGINEER CUENT OR OWNER >p'11n I1 /ev GENERAL CONTRACTOR. .. / ARCHITECT ?F ' MORTAR:. TYPE OF MORTAR • SUPPLIER A r VKp MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YA PLACED TOTAL CU YA LACED GR EMP. (Dog F.) MO TEMP. (Deg F.) AIR CONTENT TIME AIR TEMP. ?F ' CONCR ETE SUPPLIER SUPPLIER A r VKp SLUMP (IN.) MIX 4 7 Q 6 MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. ,t/ lint t a .. c. No. OF SAMPLES / e. 0i- 1.Y., TOTAL CU YA PLACED SLUMP (IN.) LI 1 / L GR EMP. (Dog F.) AIR CONTENT c r '7 DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) 3 0 0 0 No. OF SAMPLES 3 TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED q/ REMARKS CONCRETE TEMP. (Dog F.) SX TIME I , 3 J , AIR TEMP. h G 1/ AG RA rth & Environmental BYES D NO Inspector ALL REMS ABOVE WEREIN CONFORMANCE M y L BUILDING DEPARTMENT % APPROVEDFLANS?'�. IF NO, EXPLAIN AGRA Earth & Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 11194) MATERIAL FIELD REPORT Date ?/2 Yet A GROUT SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) /. /] .� rt , CX P I v-e V DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) ,t/ lint t a .. c. No. OF SAMPLES / e. 0i- 1.Y., TOTAL CU YA PLACED (/u 1+13 - GR EMP. (Dog F.) TIME AIR TEMP. AG RA rth & Environmental BYES D NO Inspector ALL REMS ABOVE WEREIN CONFORMANCE M y L BUILDING DEPARTMENT % APPROVEDFLANS?'�. IF NO, EXPLAIN AGRA Earth & Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 11194) MATERIAL FIELD REPORT Date ?/2 Yet A SPECIFIC LOCATION(S) GRIDS /. /] .� rt , CX P I v-e V 41-1-(A ,t/ lint t a .. c. -= S C-;- / e. 0i- 1.Y., o 4A, �Z\ ( , (/u 1+13 - REMARKS IN u4e ✓ t if CONTINUED AG RA rth & Environmental BYES D NO Inspector ALL REMS ABOVE WEREIN CONFORMANCE M y L BUILDING DEPARTMENT % APPROVEDFLANS?'�. IF NO, EXPLAIN AGRA Earth & Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 11194) MATERIAL FIELD REPORT Date ?/2 Yet A LABORATORY DATA DATE SPECIMANS CAST DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED LAB ID No. TEST DATE FIELD CURE AGE (DAYS) SIZE (IN) AREA (SO IN) WEIGHT (IBS) MAX LOAD (LBS) STRENGTH (PSI) SET No. LAB TECH `' %mot y ?9/76 2 at 28 Ay/7 Se 6 O T e'gO Iv] ] cos 11 070Y 3tgo "ioso LI770 b L- o L DL S' 2 6 r,Zn DESIGN STRENGTH 000 PSI @ z 2 DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED if YDS AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS 00 7; LOAD SIZE 1/ YDS REMARKS 1 ay../ 1 119 CO) 1 1 17 J / Z V d o y r /Zo/ / b );:l b FIELD DATA SUPPLIER Al_c fryi P 1 I MIX No. 7 9 a e PLANT No. Z a ❑ JOB MIX CONCRETE ❑ GROUT ❑MORTAR ❑ FLEX BEAMS ❑ PRISMS ❑ GROUTED ❑ UNGROUTED ❑ OTHER LOCATION TEMP. (Dog. F) YIELD/UNIT TIME TRUCK No. TICKET No. 'X AIR SLUMP CONC AIR WEIGHT /O ' 3S- 573 Z. y ?9/76 b,Z ( I / /z. Se 6 O DESIGN STRENGTH 000 PSI @ z 2 DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED if YDS AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS 00 7; LOAD SIZE 1/ YDS PROJECT NAME ( !t)f wc11K PRO JECT No. i /S// TEST REP 217 No. c2 LOCATION DATE / Z L/9 PAGE / 9 OF 9 PERMIT NUMBER WEATHER 60 C J P A WENT OR OWNER Dear, /YHNS/ey ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT PLACEMENT AREA ❑ FOOTINGS ❑ WALLS ❑ COLUMNS ❑ GRADE BEAMS ❑ SLAB/DECK [SLAB ❑ PILINGS ❑ OTHER INSPECTOR -AG RA fi & Environmental AGRA Earth & Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 11/94) GRIDS It'L ,(1hInc, it Sett Ice. ewe"- St' REMARKS s,GLew lK REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. 3 wird et REVIEWED BY MATERIAL TEST REPORT ADMIXTURES A F. 5' Date 4 5 CEMENT TYPE ❑ DESIGN MIX No. CEM LBS. F ASH LBS C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. SAND LBS. 1120 LBS. REPORTED BATCH DATA ❑ ACTUAL AIR ENT OZ/CWT /So I WATER ADDED BT LBS. AT ALL REMS INSPECTED ARE: Ig ❑ NONCONFORMING L BS. I TEST METHOD ❑ ASTM C 39 ❑ AASHTO T22 ❑ OTHER (Specify) ❑ COMPRESSIVE ❑ FLEXURAL ❑ CONFORMING ❑ NON - CONFORMING Weather Client I 7 INLAND JIM PACIFIC /�. ENGINEERING / ^ kil/ Date A /rye /7 Arrival Time 027( ) C,'%j %A# 4 s /ey . General Contractor Subcontractor IPE Projegt Manager/ phone number IPE Field Representative Manpower & Equipment Used . /4 en .y/ Pl G ? �. r•ryf -.., :• "�lJV /o O /', / CG - Comments: 11 / / / (Work Completed Apparently l2C "It /I u e'i� r.; S./0 /7�d R;</ 74 ;1)4 SP / (...1-e 1 ) /b` /e ..5 S per Specifications Problems / - / / ij and their Solutions) 0 / - y`' / P/N f f/ • J- rtef a /? c .,' �i ,s r . "L / ,f 1 f l"Z- . 6 +^� r r,)3, illy ihe Ae'rrc O/ tL) /S // /S /7— LC/ (4. 4 o h5 Er 'P 7 ` �w. 'J !'r I r / � ( 5/. {j ' C . )e 7u OZ%g /,era s }co fl“ - G, c f // / 2. e e% / ,J/.S /ci �'f, le', t nt /et:, ,, i,i4 /et:, a > /efr [ai'�?✓-c e � /e ,( ¢ — 'h 4)a A r for `� Attu !'c. C. 4/ O i S 7 - 4 .i t't / '� /'1-' `-' / 74t e0 c7 Tte IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE IF! CONfTRUCTION ENGINEER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: Inspector's Daily Report No.: Local Representative/ phone number erne n se - G/ Represen • we p • e number DAILY FIELD REPORT IPE Project No.: Page No. of 3 CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction enginee54nd /or IPE project manager. Date Date (l 2 4/ j IPE PROJECT MANAGER I p!c W INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING Date ,,_J/'-_4' „_J/'-_4' „_J/'-_4' 7 Inspector's Daily Report No.: IPE Project No. 7 r Page No. Comments: (Work Completed Apparently per Specifications Problems and their Sol , ,ions) A 14 4; 71r m 412 ,r-eel A 4 5' /IOW yb d pi / e . 7 7 ii.c:PtiLe ) 00 ni o /ad [/ „ JZT.Tbv1 IPE Feild Rep - 71; ( /W / /1 4/ %),- e 5 a 7 p15 74E- ( I /' — P Ce , 15 Li) 72 n Old 1 - 77 DAILY FIELD REPORT Atte. rofreia es t.11 re) r Aka) A - T / - 0. „. c t i A 6 00715 — /2e) kir( 4-6 IPE CE /---et /9h? 7 Aro Sr./age-1 r, r A rif 0 5; er 4' 47 //f 2 ///4.5 6 r ice,...be fice Arang e / of y he fe? /_,); / ,r 1 7 . / 1 5 r" A 01 :1'1 */ / ezt 490, / tim_oere) /./.4.17 /4•1; • / -Le 4 / r e•c.: i,P c5t4 Z: 7/ 0 40 5 /e,i 4.? 4 ./ ///' ,/ tea e /-1 ea 46 (74//ec/r vc-c, re-) &re) n $Ite O yed ell 7775 5 , Ao erre4 aidres_76 rAttni e e5 "enie..vity :qa-cci - 4/0.e 'y 7"/ 4 f ea. c_, Cl ttit IPE PM a .5 tit. e &AI e tc> a 5 Aoekide Contractor's Rep ist eP ..1.1(71; I — INLAND �m PACIFIC ENGINEERING Inspector's Daily Report No.: / %/G� 9 7 Aide", of Date I IPE Project No. 7 Page No. 3 Comments: (Work Completed Apparently per Specifications Problems / and their Solutions) / Non - Conforming Items: (Project or Standard Specification Observed Construction Is in Non - Compliance with) IPE Feild Rep IPE CE /{rl ta)6 - /l //, (� i, 1. � ) /r 1n..� To Soy/ otr A .e/77 .5,e-et/Cr / -P7 ein" 4 lid r5/ $/Pn AST IPE PM DAILY FIELD REPORT sf'jrniell 4 2 t 1 <JL Contractor's Rep INSPECTOR'S DAILY . REPORT INSPECTOR: j r PROJECT NO::95 PROJECT: 7 2. 'f 3' �? CONTRACTOR: _y'_G Co r_ WORK PERIOD: A.M. P.M. WEATHER A.M.: cN,,, -s �:2aa, P.M. 5.f.,..` . VISITORS: MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT SUPERINTENDENT: FOREMAN: OPERATORS: i LABORERS: 2— SURVEYORS: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: C+-7-_ 2356. - 117„1„r_ 4.0 TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: 1 ILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: STREETS CLOSED: TIME: WORK: Srzor�. ,5 rr e S A.M. 1 c7 z4 .. -Z•f�✓ 4lo.13 rut ASS /.C/H C 5 &atL CL1 4'z -!L REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: FLAGMEN: P.M. /H'. r (continued on back) PAGE _ OF _ DATE: ° J / 2 -C / c?S COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day; any problems and their solutions) I tt Krr r i Q n 5 'Ile o4—d4 C_FrrvIL •r�a LA-e-8.1- 4c7 ?e rn^ FIELD REPORT No. , '4 . - • •: . - £ Mn.n ln r hp n (Ad_ r ( pe/.Qr 0 CC • , Vr� ( .. I // /� �/ /� // /� .te A meie . 4pj 5 'r4 wcv ` 4s /. / .) eres a..y Y.xdeeM / -i GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR ( .a. inev0✓\ - by for tS Cr l.)s•.e I to. COL ti .roYV-'s • -.4 .. 1. AO 4. 30 , 4 ' ��'!` }�t�'="1 n / WEATHER . (JOLLA , coo I.(aiw. AGRA E &E Field Representative - "t e 1 _� ‘s-- AGRA E &E Project Manager�y� " Contractors Representative Date Continued 0 PROJECT NAME - l/ �IvE.,14aZ`L►1( 3"` PROJECT No.' l? -x,3/ FIELD REPORT No. , '4 LOCATION DATE /o zy -- 5.s PAGE I / OFD CLIENT OR 'OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE ARRIVAL TIME Q � 6:30 siv, / PHONE No. DAY OF WEEK s eW T CLIENT R OWNER A .� rrc�- ey V ^' GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR ( .a. inev0✓\ - SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA E &E Fl REPRESENTATIVE 3O 4 AGRA ESE PROJECT MANAGER �k-h i EQUIPMENT USED 4 ' ��'!` }�t�'="1 n / WEATHER . (JOLLA , coo I.(aiw. g *AGRA Earth &Environmental AGRA Earth & Env'vonmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/04) DAILY FIELD REPORT SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS • VARIATION FIELD FROM DISTANCE DRY FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS TEST ELEV. BELOW MAIL DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. METHOD LOCATION (FEET) GRADE TYPE (PCF) ( %) ( %) ( %) FAIL 1 , {zs Ale I a n cStriw.., a .- lyLt , , /S4.,. . ,I I, /3406:4 l,gl,q 130n s, 7 (, /a o /an / / j tO 17. P P „ „ ,I ,@ -Pc,.,..a 3 sr,.a. 's. V 1 �� rWrr. River ia� f/Y' 5 to. J es PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON: SPECIFICATION: ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 ❑ 90% D 698 ❑ 95% D 698 ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 • 90% 0 1557 ❑ 90% D 1557 ❑ OTHER ❑ OTHER T T NUMBER MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) ,� 11 C.7 Q [� p p. n1l ? 7 ,S /JJ / !ed DT DENSITY TEST RT = RETEST TEST METHOD V NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SANG CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) AGRA E &E Field Rep. (Initials) 1•, AGRA E &E Project Manager (Initials) Contractors Rep. (Initials) Continued ❑ -='— PROJECT NAM riots -oa k 3 PROJECT No / (7- /3 // FIELD REPORT No. / (0 DATE '' / /0 14 ' PAGE '.7 OF2 eAGRA Earth & Environmental DAILY FIELD REPORT AGRA Earth 8 Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) COMMENTS (Describe v.oikkl completed duMg the day. any problems and their solutions) 1 7't'hr1 VtIJ� Y1 s i a4 4f9 l_t�It • Ne9 t-cs I - o rno-i 1 Or I_ Si "� I ..hen 2 Oh i %A-9,1a It°. Lis, r7 -P c,av't SA, Iptb.t- `,,,,, t $ I - * !A.'HhLnA. AAA. n v-{ >WM"_1GZ 111 a 4 W-r ✓+Ph ( `t e0111a'u "L S o say,;Le n r 4t .-,Q -1.1 /' -L.w Q rp_ Conw��r �t�cCatla a e. =r n to ARRIVAL TIME )2- Chain DAY OF WEEK SSMT ®TF C&. A hi t- \la*, 0 b ..tA.l y4l ..IPA. ns,L Jeo- ,4J Vet , OT i_ e- t-lee- "flit ktv - ti , t- irl e f,� T , r I I. r u nn n F++•( ` p Y 1. \. T't. 1,$ p fornJ.a C pinci 1n (� � 1 ct . 0eam_sal aLi tk t"e ) atV- 1`1 w. et r 1. .1 Ate- ;evtey.low n+-IX a valt-L s IZG co c.IQto 9 ✓tt VP A�v (/ y LLPG by I e1 ? 4 2� .,a� 4 _0 , M rn..S Lt.) AS ho J- / L. /// LL mt,n °t'�_ '- tV-e A o-C t4 e�,.h e r 4..a. *r s ?ntasTSL4- u�'L�-t.. cLe- s•lor b/,P C‘ Ws. a irs AGRA E &E Field Representative AGRA E &E Project Manager • y- AVilfv., Contractors Representative Date Continued ❑ . PROJECT N^ K1VewAia a ka 4 1- ,s PROJECT No. la - l 3rl FIELD REPORT No. / 8' LOCATION DATE /0 - 0.5-1 J / PAGE / OF / ARRIVAL TIME )2- Chain DAY OF WEEK SSMT ®TF CLIENT 0 OWNER yL '111 1 ' �a N e1 .4.1.i 44,C,` ,,, . CLIENT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGM EBF.FIG!$oE�ES (ATIVt VL \ \dd \ \4C_�� AG Sob OIEC }.VW 1 ^ /// Ante. IdY WEATHER EQUIPMENT USED G AGRA Earth & Environmental AGM Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT AG RA Earth & Environmental CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE/ PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIV/ PHONE No COMMENTS (Describe work completed dung the day; any problems and their solutions) .RA E &E Field Representative Contractors Representative AGRA Earth 8 Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) AGRA E &E Project Manager Date DAILY FIELD REPOR1 DAY OF WEEK S Continued ❑ INSPECTOR'S . •DAILY : REPORT • TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: "TILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: INSPECTOR: /ant/ ,s7,j4- PROJECT NO :: g6-G /4' PROJECT: ,P.14.1/ M•,{ /4/ CONTRACTOR: j C C -, elites, WORK PERIOD: A.M. P.M. WEATHER . A.M.: clear 44 roo/ P.M.: eA :c -- q, .sr° VISITORS: MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT SUPERINTENDENT: ac,' rfrea7,irr FOREMAN:` OPERATORS: LABORERS: SURVEYORS: .. FLAGMEN: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: TIME: ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: STREETS CLOSED: lr.c WORK: 7 k :$rr:.t err P ,fe A.M. P.M. r 7, csI to eitf a- _ crrr. vWd lcrr6 trii-n 9f m a// oc'Si -d �r✓rr n _ (continued on back) REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: PAGE OF DATE: /(' /I' // i /o'r INSPECTOR'S DAILY . REPORT INSPECTOR: £rirry /% %/s PROJECT NO:: K5e q PROJECT: ,Q,w_rt <r/` S,a/ �� Adoi �� CONTRACTOR: /e1 fi)n(�riic�i'ni, WORK PERIOD: A.M. P.M. P.M.: i0.& .fa WEATHER . A.M.: l /4 VISITORS: MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT SUPERINTENDENT: / Y e o n ,rec t,4,di FOREMAN: OPERATORS: 7. LABORERS: SURVEYORS: FLAGMEN: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: �:��c✓ad ( 2/eor /ritci rr:rt� Z cn» .ri4r ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS A.M. P.M. TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED:. STREETS CLOSED: TIME: ( WORK: , fie J nh s. $e ,'7 /o; ao r w - ��h Rpocor ca �. • a acrnr, �rrcY <i y n �es� +nrn�v . ✓ PrneCe/c4 rs i rca� •// 7 C C i. � PrP c Jp / / / �4 vP VA€ iv/ r!V IV r/ e- Si Vie c79/ 6; 2 ' eksenl of a 'r n c¢ c .'.-'' l " .Ol n°r rir /s--‹ fr" it'c? n nn r..1ll`rucl / 0 n ,o /.rni e. cci>Ci nn nrlrro i -ed p /, -ra., r. (continued on back) TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: 'TILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: n REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: PAGE OF DATE: lei /1C /67C PROJECT ^AE � f'Z - ci.c PROJECT No. i2 - 13 /i DATE - i — 20 - 9 S FIELD REPORT No. / 9 PAGE I OF ,?_. Nra LOCATION ARRIVAL TIME DAY OF WEEK S S M T W T F CLIENT 0 WNER eatn. gt ...us. CLIENT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTOR I CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No.' SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA E LD REPRESENTATIVE AGRA EKE PROJECT MANAGER Bock , EQ UIPMENT USED WEATHER \- f ',AGRA Earth & Environmental COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day; any problems and their solutions) i '- t.Gier 4-es£4 r o rna titty s.4 Linea s e, -\rsis "1 V. n [X[0 n ,, r I //�� I I ,[ -e -rid/ n r- s t et I 4 M.a. r neltt e(D4 p o 0 "F4'°r ✓ CIA n AGRA ESE Field Representative Contractors Representative _ Date • Continued ❑ AGRA Earth K Environmental, Inc: (Rev. 7/94) AGRA E &E Project Manager DAILY FIELD REPORT SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS VARIATION FIELD FROM DISTANCE DRY FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS TEST ELEV. BELOW MAT'L DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. METHOD LOCATION (FEET) GRADE TYPE (PCF) (°&) ( %) ( %) FAIL E. 3 A) 11 f� ////�� . . ca I w.oh Ri vw V [ a.N6 - ' Q oT tnckci, Ave- tS F ¥ ¥.3. DATE �ff 'Q — 2— 49 c Se 121.4 (o.? 7.5".z- 0.1 P saw..., Rlvtr ta.�.ei go w, '7 l w.t.n L / - 129. 0 13o -3 13136.0 (QI.Z /e.5 74. 97.1 o4 08 P _ F P aea POOH G. vtr ta.ae, w . * 3 Sent-14A., a L 4' V Sa wce.. %ar 1a.+.6. @Lo + 44 / No Ya, s'E. vc¢ rS = -..TSG cA LL s L PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON: SPECIFICATION: - ei t'Uaiton. ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 ❑ 90% D 698 ❑ 95% D 698 ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM O 1557 ❑ 90% D 1557 ❑ 90% D 1557 ❑ OTHER ❑ OTHER TEST NUMBER MATERIAL- REFERENCE MATERIAL . MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) Ara 1 3.3$ 6.7 DT DENSITY TEST RT = RETEST TEST METHOD 07. ("NUCLE (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) /���]//y/1" E Field Rep. " ` AGRA E &E Project Manager (Initials) 1 ' ' Contractors Rep. (Initials) Continued ❑ . AGRA &E (Initials) (� PROJECT NAME P 1 Vev- �lJa 1k a E. 3 PROJECT No. /Q- 131) FIELD REPORT No. f7 DATE �ff 'Q — 2— 49 c Se PAGE 0 ? OF • _ ,AGRA Earth & Environmental _AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. -(Rev. 7/94) . DAILY FIELD REPORT COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day; any problems and their solutions) l il rNllte0 0 c;111 �i e t-l- -t',e- ChtJn4 re it 1kv�le�r�wn - _ -_ .. .... 0,n ..•, J.. e . .• •. . . .A., • !J- -.. W . ► , t _ I • _ - DATE /0 -.27 -9.5 - ... • ..� —0 rrst2 t (� // . nn . ag20 .4 .,, it t.'ct r #nee/0 41P,,P , - tit tt.c� -- f�prFc- t 44.0.-Lc, � in-,1 CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE /PHONE No. r LAwy u1 o.P run •oor .2 g s -tpr,, , a 2 i s / CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. ' > Q t ' 1 l .. . • • ' - I r .A • r , • _acre- -PP e v Irr .0..4- O∎ \.)`QVAI° .'o lnc,Q.-S /_ / , tafr0 '/ XP Con IkIC.BI -C t • rP i na )ra in L -S - wr j — a ti nt • r 1n U. a -I- JA 4- view a c re. Arap 1 j y n A ✓ 1. VP - ) S,n Tit ttSed - eva r d C.Mn -H S rig 2 / 0" S EQUIPMENT USED / eui077 Srknrv. AGRA Contractors E &E Project Manager Cr-IL E &E Field Representative ) e' VtaA4 •'• AGRA Representative - Date . Continued ❑ PROJECTN{�k,E •_,� / ,VeAriv a IV_ 0'2 D it . n . GGi.�lc.z PROJECT No. I2 -/3l/ FIE REPORT No. -.O LOCATION DATE /0 -.27 -9.5 PAGE / OF ARRIVAL TIME /; i/S 'PM DAY OF WEEK S S M T W T F � W C LIENTO O� e1 CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE /PHONE No. h 6L GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR K C SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. beck r AGRA E& IELD REPRE AGRA PROJECT MANAGER n (Q' I A13. air / c a b , aut ((y V Arap WEATHER ' P a a i C loJy .514-. Rv-eeta , 2 / 0" S EQUIPMENT USED / eui077 Srknrv. � AGRA Earth & Environmental AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS VARIATION - FIELD FROM DISTANCE DRY FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS TEST ELEV. BELOW MATT DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. METHOD LOCATION (FEET) GRADE. TYPE (PCF) ( %) - ( %) ( %) FAIL 1 Al 7 Ave., 21r1a .��� •^, qo of SA41�+ awe Ia 7'nl. FIELD REPORT No. o� F. R. A8t- I'M 4.1 11.6 2.2.4, n ^ � C v r Mich»., A. Z i.hw., al-of 3 3 L ` rAell a.A^ A1N-., a . ,.. 75 o f .c. �,, d,Q Aa A-vt., 2 1 35' . v Sa vvmst% Qi %4-9- v 14..1 C l c a C t 11 %I S 3 %% ~ 132. 4.0 9S. L 0.7 P T"i 8. _ r...,s l sc ' r$C PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON SPECIFICATION: E I Q,�/a N ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 ❑ 90% D 698 ❑ 95 %0696 � ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 ❑ 90% D 1557 ❑ 90% D 1557 ❑ OTHER ❑ OTHER MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. (%) ST NUMBER /� Rj A45 C...- %r%(•.Aa.� nS £ a r RASP J 3 go 6 ,7 a ENSITY TEST RT= RETEST TEST METHOD ff NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC. DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2 7) 1 �% V \p N ` AGRA E &E Project Manager (Initials) Contractor's Rep. (Initials) Continued ❑ AGRA E &E Field Rep. (Initials) PROJECT NAM ' . -_ � .. ,_ - - PROJECT No. ) 7 -)3 11 FIELD REPORT No. o� DATE [� l T /// - . 7 / J PAGE 7 �OF 'C AGRA Earth & Environmental AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. Rev.]/9<) DAILY FIELD REPORT INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT • INSPECTOR: ,ZQfrr /li %/s PROJECT NO.: q3-5 -.7 PROJECT: /2 /'ewer /� .rea /P.r. ,E? /enc,%o 9 Z^'° r'df4�ciY /io.> 9srar CONTRACTOR: A- Cnn.f/<r„a 'nom WORK PERIOD: . A.M. P.M. WEATHER . A.M.: rl�r q c - s P.M.: , /.°nr s'29° VISITORS: MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT SUPERINTENDENT: //'r -. � ri7 , : 7 . s E / FOREMAN: OPERATORS: c LABORERS: • y SURVEYORS: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: 23:-A,nlr </f / %7 TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: . .A.M.. . P.M. STREETS CLOSED: . TIME: WORK: ro, 7 e <1/2 ,-47/ /0.4 - A7 – • /%4 ICS 7 ^' /i /fTY //e ms✓ // 41> L� / ! ,474/e7 <4 i - /n ".Se" ei- "net I e�.7g 2' X74 der � t i r �v6/ T frd . 77e n _.�TC' /..�//i d // /4c.:f/ 9ravO / /79 /r,i7 /.'r .49/-7 /-7 o / �� / j v VI er t T ytr / � 1` Thy Yir�n� /-r �reir�� �% nari' oar/" . sr /�rFid eZroi -eir //v e,/ , f" //e 4, ,4e ao ifrr.Yor AT ; 'JC drev 76 />'rr �to.Y sl�: fi';�� roc -%-/ �r,�de / (continued .on back) TESTS: WORK DELAYS: . AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: . "ILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: FLAGMEN: ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS PAGE OF _ DATE: /c7 /z ? / 9r` ACCOUNT OF WORK (CONT'D) WORK: /7,-5e*4 ,dice r ,w rrr do _277,-4;4•7,---, 4' e 74.(r afferri it - efl ,er/ erA' lie ii>�r,ref /on 0 2'odm�.n n e' fivn %e ,P /'r<r Lane 7err n7 77 Z .. 74e nil Le Perp 9r% o/ , Eime•., e �,2Pirner <e0,0 nett- /'red et Ae tree- 4m ,/ %e ronC4 -74,,v4d �� / �ti � e or /rr i ovE4 �i ny iii � it /�+ a, /e TIME: 93 /yam �r�nr/e /?/r r ���nr%��ed n.� 4/s yry:,/ y 'P g /r 4 7 re.4,-1. INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT • INSPECTOR: PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: ,e r" WEATHER A.M.: VISITORS: OPERATORS: 4/ LABORERS: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: ,S rrr "9tr TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: STREETS CLOSED: TIME: WORK: 174e ` � PC "-arty Vid �,'vrru9cT /.� , reer7er ex- Ann.it;”i f n ,4//�/in WORK PERIOD: P.M.: Cnn STY, nr r,r7 MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT SURVEYORS: A.M. SUPERINTENDENT: 9/2i✓P B rr �,i7 n� FOREMAN: FLAGMEN: ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS A.M. PROJECT NO.: r1 'e j 15:-G/ 7 9sr P.M. Ce7 r -ene /Viet rl r In r7Cal7Xrir7 / s ec/ e n enr:.� // i ■ .5,- 4 r"'r i,.") , //7P - CPU Jer' f7 Om /SIN n,° # - / stucer P.M. A- 7 e , t 74 - 1 1 - 0 - 1� 7P ,tFC f /ter ri% /fir r,a.yC !eel i4, C.-ew Jar'f 7 / / fre, /7 --e / n�..a r i rya! 4 7 /,e rafter 7 h - STd�rk/J./rr/ iti creed an/ lo_y ed .e 9,74 a ✓ ,6447 ee n�c ,4' /./�,/ k r. ors / rrrr rtn3�/ /erl e/-2 rr W1-:-/7 ,oJ^ 7,s fa' r2C /gyp rAp - -a r, rPr %r z,I,gC 424 %7 i.i e,aJ WORK DELAYS: jlkC4wnc,cz,.,.P. 3,ea AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: 'TILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: PAGE OF DATE: /e, / / 9r C-e95 ' INSPECTOR'S:-. D -ALLY REPORT 0 INSPECTOR: vrrry' ,4-7,;;;;*- / t PROJECT NO:: g, -,f- e7 PROJECT: .94- ,orr��nl/e fewerexY'enxin / 9. "d am &, Ar✓h:24in _ 9s�Q CONTRACTOR: /-r' e.'.,n"4.„rf/en -WORK PERIOD: A.M. P.M. WEATHER A.M.: c /rr €c P.M.: c/ar- *9'c VISITORS: MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT SUPERINTENDENT: (Owe 4 e.17si7.r /.' FOREMAN: OPERATORS: y LABORERS: y SURVEYORS: FLAGMEN: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: •firma er /,r / /,Or.r ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: A.M. STREETS CLOSED: TIME: %srz WORK: / J /le refry/Inc ir�.rfir / /eA/��i.rr��iD� �/- 14-47 er�i .Y c nn.c + /J e e3W /near ,e/n..r .rrrn.tri!'s/ied is{ —es ..--franzrr c iyrr�s. 4 av G (low a <fr a) � \ Van — #47 ai�'p / / / F.? / A� �..�,/ 74-72 �-,r., -, / .,n/ f �@lfl✓ P.M. rf erneen, ,4 // %n4 t. & - c , (ee oreg r /rn>' rer« //i r rrle c/ cr, 'c 04/774 n/ /neera «/,ir��i (continued on back) TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: O TILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: PAGE OF _ DATE: ,1W/ /_ G�/G � TIME: WORK: ACCOUNT OF .WORK .(CONT'D) ee Cq at t /ens / 7 / / 9.r // i/�iir / flip. ,, f pr�'v / cC' .4 A 2 ri9c< ii�cr rn' ni a t% L iver A4 : 7Se s P 145s4 �r%ir Fyn P. /'zn 1/4 z`' COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the clay any problems and their solutons) - - PROJECT No. /o2 - /3e/ - F ,1AID 61-1Se rhu pi 1( )e-n eio p 5,• "7c TES! ,U/ ?7YOF este A (nut se PAGE / OF ARRIVAL TI IMMAEEE - .. . /• ,4 r DAY OF WEEK `S `S M V WI.T eer ;---r,r.D3 Ile Fir-, 71647 i( fl6 �vls� at) Terre 7 ?A)7 4c7EST&7) .J r 0421?; Ai F 0 p 0-- OW NCE • 4 t'F1' 4 AATF hN g- (I P -LK\DI NO I; AGRA E&E FIELD REPRESENTATIVE . WWI r// AGRA E&E PROJECT MANAGER . Cat 4, / WEATHER aLe)jc /Yo OUIPMENT USED cY) 7< DA . c AA h /7 � f l S � ? ) 7S ( n ( , , C ) 7 7 / ) 121-7:i - 7n r /f? i? 1 -pri2T c2O . / • AGRA E &E' Field Representative �• -� — - AGRA E &E Project Manager _ _ _ Contractor's Representative - Date // //A: Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME • • PROJECT No. /o2 - /3e/ FIELD REPORT No. cQ / ,�,»o cX , v 3 4-4 rn LOCATION DATE i / /Vi /.S PAGE / OF ARRIVAL TI IMMAEEE - .. . /• ,4 r DAY OF WEEK `S `S M V WI.T C LIENT OR OWNER - . •F CLIENT. OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. - GENERAL CONTRACTOR . CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. . SUBCONTRACTOR - SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No.'- AGRA E&E FIELD REPRESENTATIVE . WWI r// AGRA E&E PROJECT MANAGER . Cat 4, / WEATHER aLe)jc /Yo OUIPMENT USED eAG RA Earth & Environmental AGRA Eanh & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY'FIELD,REPORT SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS. VARIATION FIELD - FROM ' DISTANCE DRY FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM . PASS TEST ELEV. BELOW MAIL DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. METHOD LOCATION - . (FEET) . GRADE TYPE (PCF) (%) ( %) ( %) FAIL - • Apberiew PROJECT No la 12 -1' Ui, OP SAl.lµOI.Y MOEIL' WUr 5 N, O ¢• cu 21. OA -Io U • ( tI I I It' ABC: wit 15c.`1 i (31.5 ` 7. - 7 .. ( 15.7 ` 1E,7 «. ia ` LJ; OR 5tt�wtop 1't eet t..-V 2 ' 10. V 6 u TlvPlt1/1a AvE 3 (cc ( E cr't cF p•..t L't K -LflJ; jAiZutrApA 7' 500 S . - aT9 (�- Pf*L 13d,5 (-I.( `15), P S9' E of . 5Alittau I?Lk' I LA oz • -10 ; u, untaur� purr r/ O L l ( o () (c. N5 ADC. 127( 1:; LI•1 ?S,v L (/Q r ■ r � , . 5 v1/4 c, f e . $ cY= 5 V t \t DI.a 4.t t.'k OWL 'at. O Y 5. 4 Cu TL:Im) a , (r> „1t :. ` � : $),ou.Op 12.ICt\. C11LSC � s's or. 1. el? 1NbtApA II -/0 J' p :,2ti,2. `i.,6 i `' I q&,o E L t. F 'S4A LAU+) I tC*'Y" —. LA Or ` 5 S c v .�ON alibi 0 1 _ Ur ,, tt litc I35 1331 ta/ - f y.. Li ,j 5?5 3' `IJ, 1 P 44::0 E 'L'. GC 'M LMOL.% t= lk:GIL I_ uk' ' 3 cP q olu znmta� - - I Il G 1 ' I 4'o' E c.F cG StuAt 112,0t\ lcaNrr ¢ _ 6r lubtAtiA ,Vir O b— Rae (3 4s. PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON: SPECIFICATION: ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 ❑ 90% D 698 ❑ 95% D 698 ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 ❑ 90% D 1557 ❑ 90% D 1557 ❑ OTHER R OTHER ySi.. j brSi7 TEST NUMBER MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) _ "• ,_. (: �, ( f- RSG .. yy ' '(. 0 7 6 =. DT =DENSITY TEST RT =RETEST - TEST METHOD - - Q r / N = NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC • DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) - - AGRA E &E Field Rep. (Initials) AGRA E &E Project Manager (Initials) Contractor's Rep. (Initials) Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME L( tj Yttx)ALt- 0r� - 3 - • Apberiew PROJECT No la FIELD REPORT No. ,>?/ DATE .1445 PAGE ^� aOFZ• I AGRA Earth & Environmental AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day: any problems and their solutions) - /4PCI( k-3n CJL) „ 7e ,t1�OF u4 CFJ £� r 'Uesc __A / T& t $ A2 eencpne-Tio c Lu b flJ, 7F-S 75 /96) Snn4 Snc c s EC/0 y . k � - nc k-»c Rs � ,/]mac n�ic_�?P CA? t4.7 .a, • T� t �O F, ctp a- rW Ss.?A4cE guy): 2e - nn.) r, F l• ci JA g - 1.4Ak5 Sof P4 L Ijgs aA) /JiSL ?OOcS Rein ?EA _zz 7z?P-L NZ Vg enno4e-rCON, Eel -x m ! 4-ia . _pA:z�r) GENERAL CONTRAC •R CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA FIELD REPRESENTATIVE AGRA E &E PROJECT MANAGER A ! rfA40,C I` e WEATHER al -elte__ / yb d AGRA E &E F?d.Representative Ck-! L; tC�L[/t AGRA E &E Pro Manag - -- Contracts epresentative Date ?` Continued El -«/C PROJECT ME i cu4cL � 02 '"' C ,3� t44 A n 0,J PROJECT No. /02 - /.3i/ DATE / / /9kc ARRIVAL TIM /.3Q PM FIELD REPORT No. 02 / PAGE /OF a—. DAY OF WEEK SS MT&vTF LOCATION CLIENT OR OWNER y: - A CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRAC •R CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA FIELD REPRESENTATIVE AGRA E &E PROJECT MANAGER A ! rfA40,C I` e WEATHER al -elte__ / yb d EQUIPMENT USED rr , AGRA Earth & Environmental DAILY FIELD REPORT AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7194) SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS VARIATION FIELD FROM DISTANCE DRY FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS TEST ELEV. BELOW MAIL DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. METHOD LOCATION (FEET) GRADE TYPE (PCF) ( %) ( %) ( %) FAIL I :1 0 12 r ;. OF 57444.4,0e. rZtoLIt, LAu 5 ' A1, OF j' c.; Xi DrrTAN - 19U ABc 136.9 7-7 j.7 1 3 —2JJ tat't,;. OP 5.L.LlOccp 'u0En- LV.i%E („ L � O ` D ,, I � A .^ i it-oe to il Ave_ 134.5 96.7 P y; O, e op tor -5 ; (2. ,:rlr- LYa4 t ,t.: 2UD(Ap A 7' 50P t_ 5 9' C OP t 3ALMOt) 24 vL LACC .,: 7UDtAtiR T r - `® r/ I D (9L` b 65c_ 15 132,5 Lai i - 7.4 , 4 . 1 95.A_ Q� .0 P P 1 4 5 d 01,0 E- E o.= S:1L oL_: L': e LAri)e S'5. op ' of . r obI ?. L ,a e it op SAN 12 -LVC`2 04,e 5 1 9 3r' o - ./ >ii�1.)A .- 4bO E .`.? LOADNreioeYL L?rut 5' a oc ii cN 4 E /tow 5 VI JP sAL lLO4; IZ.LVeI'L L.itit S' 5. OP g- OF% TN/Du-WA - T 9 O ti 0 d O �' / ' t l4 Id' (s ll Abe_ N ABC 0S Rbe (31;0 ^ � 1029.2 - 133 tai9 131` - 3.4 y.) - 7,(.0 9.A. L,5 4 ?A 964 9,5:33 sl' c od e to P P P P (.9 J 7 gr ct y e / ta= op SAJAc (4JLw LAW CN) . o0 yD A Acr PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON: SPECIFICATION: ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 ❑ 90% D 698 ❑ 95% D 698 ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 ❑ 90% D 1557 ❑ 90% D1557 ❑ OTHER gI OTHER D /.5J1 5' TEST NUMBER MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) AV� IQ. S � /L n_ _{ 1 fwie`Je ?d /33 7 /L. DT = DENSITY TEST RT = RETEST TEST METHOD JJ JUNI 11E Sc9[ L_ / 3 3. `.Y /e . / N = NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) AGRA E &E Field Rep. (Initials) AGRA E &E Project Manager (Initials) Contractor's Rep. (Initials) Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME eiu trusic 1 e W 4OO rnoN PROJECT No. 1x'1361 DATE / < 1 95 FIELD REPORT No .2i PAGE aOF Z. F ,AG RA Earth & Environmental DAILY FIELD REPORT AGRA Earth & Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 7/90) COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day; any problems and their solutions) I rr1 �� ♦ t 4 - t ,�-1C ✓k� f � C 1- LCCd'� 1 � Saw-rote ^_.- Q N'-tQ Ve 1- Z / sl •' .. rd..,. , 4- s/�I.ul4 c � — QV — rn l CAA 4 Sal k : ' •. 1 s 4... 1_ 2 \-ts • o �— Csn—S, —Q_b c�_ I v�(� • .� _.. 0 ` h.01 / • N a 1r r'1 V ct I T A.tt,^ o — ARRIVAL TIME 7 9 7 .44 e 9 _fe I x P en COus1f. & ?4 :tr 1,q M P.44°, G CphabY r. u 1 1 v..y�1.0�Z- . C' ,i-H L ,e,,,,- - 7 --- 10 s r Z. v rL n e 44Arn 4 4.P_ C L, ., In p ilia T,r. •�.rsroj a .I- $ -nn 4-%/1 . I , 1-0 is r I r 011 �J/�J /v.�. I in Sy L,l� . a ai- saw Y�lr�'. PE?' r _a_i J�G.SSL.p/_� `aS.:1- �GL- I - n V.IY - i'� f w • % s i La r r+ rte rx .. .l•cn) .10c cc 4 .x 4- ! I 1 5 A-tvv__ \ AGRA E &E Project Manager AGRA E &E Field Representative L h Contractors Representative Date Continued • PROJECT NAM E_ •) 2 4 3 � �( PROJECT /2 TNO /' DATE 1 /l — G -9S FIELD REPO NO� PAGE i OF K e �evwcx 1k LOCATION - ARRIVAL TIME 7 9 7 .44 e DAY OF WEEK S S ®T W T F CLIENT OR WNER 'ea seN S I x CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTOR I f CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRAAt TOR T SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA ESE F D REPRESENTATIVE 1 CA V JAI AGRAA ELF PROJECT MANAGER .1 gi,,,G( WEATHER n ckQv 6n ICJ EQUIPMENT USED 0 AG R A Earth & Environmental AGRA Earth L Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 754) DAILY FIELD REPORT TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED TYPE OF STRUCTURE INSPECTED - RESTEEL STRUCTURAL STEEL FABRICATION SUPPLIER 4C_ in P ❑ COLUMNS . SLAB -ON -GRADE . FOOTINGS FIELD REPORT No. ❑ AUGER CAST PILING GRADE BEAMS WALLS OTHER (Specify) MI REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION REINFORCED MASONRY EXPANSION BOLTS �YSHOTCRETE \^ 0 1(FJ`/RE PR FING llcL OTHER (Specify) I .I A V"f'ti eZ -cei) Cin STRUCTURAL GRADE 0 POST TENSIONED SLAB R(7 I I - C-IA AD PAGE TOTAL CU YARDS • •. CED No. OF SAMPLES 4/ PROJECT NAM 1 LOCATION a D d . 4I _ SUPPLIER 4C_ in P PROD CT No 90 FIELD REPORT No. / -1 I/ DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) 7 — 6 _9 6 PAGE TOTAL CU YARDS • •. CED No. OF SAMPLES 4/ MORTAR TEMP. (Deg F.) PERMIT NUMBER t- Pc:e1 L WEATHER A p ^ -� III Y . -2 CLIENT OR NER �M/� 1' �}{w1 I 4� 1 ENGINEER ern (Q v.-co GENERAL CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT k ?tk NCRETE . MORTAR TYPE OF MORTAR SUPPLIER 4C_ in P MATERIAL TEST REPORT No 90 SLUMP (IN.) fv a •- DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) SLUMP (IN.) / CI) No. OF SAMPLES 4/ - 7 TOTAL CU YARDS • •. CED No. OF SAMPLES 4/ MORTAR TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME AIR TEMP. k ?tk NCRETE . .. ,.., SUPPLIER SUPPLIER 4C_ in P MIX # ' 90 MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. OC a fv a •- DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) SLUMP (IN.) / CI) AIR CONTENT 4/ - 7 DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) 300 0 No. OF SAMPLES 4/ GR•UT TEMP. (Deg F.) TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED ..- AIR TEMP. CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) / 7 TIME /t ! a '7) a A4` AIR TEMP. 3 -7 @AGRA Earth & Environmental YES 0 ALL ITEMS ABOVE WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH • BUILDING DEPA ITMENTAPPROVED PLANS F NO, EXPLAIN Date — h — [� MATERIAL FIELD REPORT GROUT SUPPLIER GRIDS MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. ( J , Ea s4 ( t ri l �'�7 , 4cn R (.\ n T`�C \/G✓ qv\('' 1 I \1 CG e1• n-c 4 -- a (OW) r, 7 . SLUMP (IN.) fv a •- DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU • DS PLACED GR•UT TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME AIR TEMP. @AGRA Earth & Environmental YES 0 ALL ITEMS ABOVE WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH • BUILDING DEPA ITMENTAPPROVED PLANS F NO, EXPLAIN Date — h — [� MATERIAL FIELD REPORT ;:. SPECIFIC LOCATION(S) GRIDS e I I� c (T Mnn✓� 1.Nk' N ) ( J , Ea s4 ( t ri l �'�7 , 4cn R (.\ n T`�C \/G✓ qv\('' 1 I \1 CG e1• n-c 4 -- a (OW) r, 7 . (n� non)) fv a •- IEMARKS L ti(=1 CONTINUED . @AGRA Earth & Environmental YES 0 ALL ITEMS ABOVE WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH • BUILDING DEPA ITMENTAPPROVED PLANS F NO, EXPLAIN Date — h — [� MATERIAL FIELD REPORT FIELD DATA SUPPLIER 4 c w e__ MIX MIX No 790 PLANT No. , R Q { JOB MIX LOCATION X CONCRETE GROUT 111 MORTAR I♦ FLEX BEAMS PRISMS GROUTED UNGROUTED OTHER DATE / p 77 —. -9 5 PERMIT NUMBER TEMP. (Deg. F) YIELD/UNIT TIME TRUCK No. No. % AIR • SLUMP CONC AIR WEIGHT le:30 5I(oy ..11 TIIICKKET - IZZ3oS 4 1. - 7 /.D 61 37 q ( l g-v (LO S S) /Xr 7o / ( 7� � 1 / s .ASTM C39 ( 0 AASHTO T22 OTHER (Specify) V+ , (y � � r R E DESIGN STRENGTH 3 Qa0 PSI @ av DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED — YDS AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS LOAD SIZE / Q YDS PROJECT NAME '' nn Q -IJ I K 2 4 34 /� det Lev, s PROJECT No. / 0 �l3 It TEST RE T o LOCATION ENGINEER DATE / p 77 —. -9 5 PERMIT NUMBER PAGE 3 i7 OF WEATHER /^/ G(cPV 6 I/I / k_ y. 1L3 —`• SIZE (IN) CLIENT OR OW WEIGHT (LBS) GENERAL CONTRACTOR -- - -- ARCHITECT ;,- f F' s LABORATORY DATA - - • DATE SPECIMANS CAST I I — G _9 S DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED LAB ID No. TEST DATE FIELD CURE AGE (DAYS) SIZE (IN) AREA (SO IN) WEIGHT (LBS) MAX LOAD - STRENGTH (PSI) SET No. LAB TECH TEST METHOD ' / /c li3 ( 7 6 12 -4 J t q ( l g-v (LO S S) /Xr 7o / ( 7� � 1 / s .ASTM C39 ( 0 AASHTO T22 OTHER (Specify) V+ , (y � � r R E V COMPRESSIVE n FLEXURAL CONFORMING NON - CONFORMING =MARKS AG RA Earth & Environmental CEMENT AREA D FOOTINGS Ei WALLS ▪ COLUMNS ❑ GRADE BEAMS ▪ SLAB/DECK SLAB ❑ PILINGS THER Reviewed by C GRIDS SQ�IM�✓\ a1 M' 1r`('+ ' N t y /, 27 .5"' n . e v E Sa nr G -1W ✓In Z0 �1 - LK C) r.. ►�/ n ✓- T- IneS144'.. n V rpn eP lfriCt AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) REVIEWED BY Date l MATERIAL TEST REPORT REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. REPORTED BATCH DATA CEMENT TYPE DESIGN MIX No. CEM LBS. F ASH LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. SAND LBS. H2O LBS. ❑ ACTUAL ADMIXTURES AIR ENT OZ/CWT WATER ADDED BT LBS. LBS. ALL ITEMS INSPECTED ARE: , ONFORMING NON- CONFORMING alF rakii4 " W4 4 rin t e r aBORATORY I DATA PI P• I II '''" t 4 ' 1 .S ; I ' 10 .. . . aeaG+:4:147. ,..C....,, -.t.,3iSij'“4 . I Ii ff I ' Iltri ' VS ' I. '' . 4 4 , :<.'ii.:•-;:ta: DATE SPECIMANS CAST ) / -.- C —9 C DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED / / • 7 - ir c - LAB ID No. TEST DATE FIELD CURE AGE (DAYS) SIZE (IN) AREA (SO IN) SLUMP WEIGHT (IBS) AIR MAX LOAD (1.65) STRENGTH (PSI) SET No. LAB TECH ... • 0" lilt 6.il 37 2 _ _ 4.• --- 70 C a'? 4. _ AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS LOAD SIZE / 0 YDS3 ...... - 0 - 4o . .7* 1 1 ,.._ • g ■ .... ' 41- r REMARKS Rt A 44 OR ■A>kal / -1CA AA /. - 4 -1 - ,C: $9:* ..e,) 2:PA; .t'ig. •:. k ' 7 ( . 11141 4iiijiif ri ; ' j 1 • ' ' ''''''''.,<- ..:1.. • tee) oc...etv.er. „ . . -; ;,::'-'^$.. -, - ., 4*.:-.:-', - SUPPLIER 4 t_w■t_ MIX No. 790 (0 PLANT No. .R 0 JOB MIX ! CONCRETE GROUT MORTAR FLEX BEAMS PRISMS 9 GROUTED UNGROUTED OTHER LOCATION 4 ; C Pe■ ser TEMP. (Deg F) YIELD/UNR TIME TRUCK No. TICKET No % AIR SLUMP CONC AIR WEIGHT It:30 5 , wi 4 z.z3os 44.7 J.() 6.il 37 -- DESIGN STRENGTH S co o PSI .2 D_I- DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED -- YDS AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS LOAD SIZE / 0 YDS3 PROJECT NAME ri. te tromi l k 2 slit "z 4- Arai 1,14,,,, s PROJECT No J.--iitt TEST RE R al4o. LOCATION 4 ; C Pe■ ser DATE / 1-4. -9 5 PERMIT NUMBER PAGE OF 3 er WEATHER I e ten V Cea / CUENT OR OW to.... k 14e/11 s 1, y ENGINEER a k . - , 0 PCL e`47 r GENERAL CONTRACTOR 14 C . ARCHITECT • (is AG R A Earth & Environmental • 9 FOOTINGS 9 WALLS 9 COLUMNS 9 GRADE BEAMS 9 SLAB/DECK Eli sue PILINGS THEE) cc Nvv. '2%.10,... i t: 7 S E. 4 5,1,„„ 12,0 It - 0 VN n.4-LforOnt n let rid L4A4 GRIDS AGRA Earth & Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 11/94) REVIEWED BY MATERIAL TEST REPORT REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. 2 t 64 1 Reviewed by Date P • REPORTED BATCH DATA : CEMENT TYPE 9 DESIGN MIX No. CEM LBS. F ASH LBS C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. SAND LBS. H2O LBS. 9 ACTUAL ADMIXTURES AIR ENT OZJCWT WATER ADDED BT 1-1 1 S _IP I LBS. ":•; INSPECTED ARE: tiL. ONFORMING NONCONFORMING TEST METHOD C 39 LII AAsx T-22 111 OTHER (Specify) $ COMPRESSIVE FLEXURAL 9 CONFORMING 9 NONCONFORMING SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS VARIATION FIELD FROM DISTANCE DRY FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS TEST ELEV. BELOW MAIL DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. METHOD LOCATION (FEET) GRADE TYPE (PCF) ( %) ( %) ( %) FAIL / U Sq lent." IAvav la,t; a Q. ocr 6Av AN_ . & Fo4 e..,e %..., FB. 4AC 130.1 6_4 1.6 5.0 93 $ 9-2.47 93.1 r).3 0 / 1.7 � `i" p 2 Sal.+•.en tenor Iay‘e• 35Th. o-CSal•v.c., fa,ue la.,. @ S c . a , a h,,,. 1:a.7 124.E 3 Sn, w.c., )e (.2.".., • yo ' oCsale,c., aw,,,ta•7 Ca , i...,,4,nh 1 j $ 1 . v, a.,. Gvc in N..• a • 00 Cris ^1.-v.� a -- trlw. la. r....t,l.-,r } C� a l w° - Flee. lae, 04" Cal•t. CrUe.ila r• Ca x.44, I'1 ale 5a1•- z %Ave.ta..e•aoo'if, a- I- 5.1.•.A� P�,w d IaV.e P I /_M. 1\ ,AC 130.25 121.7 128. / 27,1 ea 3.7 1 z. 1 S. S 93.9 92.1 717 yz.z. 1. l 3.0 3.10 /.? t n T' P P" / P S 7 Sa1..c., erve ; c� Sal,r. le,..cv Ia..n e ra[L.t-s e Lnar e —�s. snow..... IQ\',erla•,t; /S'a.o -' I 1 aa�s�vt. �!a �F ✓.I.I:.. 1/ V 1.274 �/. 7 93.1 y a('� {7 T r. B. `- 'F+hlS lei 62- -se e i : - q S E PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON: SPECIFICATION: tto ��"TT�i`h ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 ❑ 90 %13 698 ❑ 95% D 698 ODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 ❑ 90% D 1555/7 ❑ 90% D 1557 ❑ OTHER V OTHER !i4 IN 5"<e7 TEST NUMBER MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) 1 ..,7 4. 7 D ENSITY TEST RT = RETEST METHOD _ a ,. C / TEST °- NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) AGRA E &E Field Rep. (Initials)SS— AGRA E &E Project Manager (Initials) Contractors Rep. (Initials) Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME P /AW 0J z� r � PROJECT No. / — 1 a� ,3, DATE �! G -9 S FIELD REPORT No. 07 PAGE y OF9' ,AGRA Earth & Environmental AGRA Earth 8 Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT SPECIFIC GRAVITY -OF BITUMINOUS MIXTU OSH a TM 306 -A (F) WORKSHEET Project: F4 ocizwAtx o2' 3 A-Dt T tort Project #: 42_43// Sample #: Depth: Lab if 3. 1,2_ Location/Source: Tun1404, A,C Cw 5aca &on..(A - ID `ti, n F t_ Date Tested: //_ 5 9_ 9 Material Description: A S f H A L } Tested By: t ..,,,,,, en_ JAR (P' OMETER) CALIBRATION Wt. ofJar, Glass o 2986. IS g 07930,$ g 0 g Wt. of Water, Jar, Glass B 73'3. , g lag I . I g 731P' 5 g -741, o ° F Temperature of Water U 7/.7 ° F 75, a °F (Gw) Temperature Conversion Factor L1 99 7sa7 . 99 79& , 99737°/ (Vp) Volume ofJar (B — A) _ D E LI.y to :` - 1 CC E2 Y`/ / ;. 2 cc E, uq j j cc to ciJietioo No I N I (AVG. VP) (E, +E, +E,) =3 I F ,,,,, SPECIFIC GRAVITY & MAXIMUM DENSITY a No Sublet or Test No. . No. Sublet or Test No. L . No. Sublets or Tat No. Wt. of Jar, Glass I aggp, g g g g Wt. of Sample, Jar, Glass 2 LIo g g g (Ws) Wt. of Sample 2— 1 3 /09/. a_ g g g Wt. of Water, Sample, Jar, Glass 4 8036. 3 g g g (Ww) Wt. of Water 4— 2 5 3%3.3 g g g Temperature of Water 6 733 °F °F °F (Gw) Temperature Conversion Factor 7 ,497 477 Volume of Water 5_ 7 8 3973.3 cc cc cc Volume of Sample F - 8 9 5/33 cc cc cc (Gz) Specific Gravity 3 - 9 10 a, y87 (MDT) Max Density Test Result 10 x 62.4 11 /55-. Z- PCF PCF PCF Difference Between 11 & Last MAMD PCF PCF PCF MOVING AVERAGE MAXIMUM DENSITY (MAMD) No. of MOTs Avenged IMAMD (Using MDT From 11) MA-MD Pc No. I MAMD PCF No. MAMD I PCF Remarks: RICEFORM.PUB 5 /12)94 ,�' A (,3 R A I Checked by: Earth & Environmenta E 520 North Foothills Drive, Suite 600 Spokane. Washington, USA- 99207 INSPECTOR'S .. DAILY • INSPECTOR: Z PROJECT: 3 a ' d. CONTRACTOR: / EEC ct,,; „ „4„� WORK PERIOD: A.M. WEATHER A.M.: P.M.: VISITORS: SUPERINTENDENT: (/ OPERATORS: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: Y MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT Ge G <> s reca4t.c, i LABORERS: REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER eru ✓tied ra% 4/roar //oe wr6, PAGE OF FOREMAN: SURVEYORS: crs / 1 9 A.M. 4,41; REPORT — Comer uz CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: PROJECT NO.: qs 2 7H trove? FLAGMEN: ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: STREETS CLOSED: TIME: WORK: /O,7 7 a "74 si4o a7 g'oo ciS(; /R .2:-Ar i ec✓ i ii £' i -er s ' %PI) u /en o.-i , rrsP A 7, :.4p cy % -/der /rrr cirri )41 X1/ P.M. Ca: - e i c” P.M. qSS 2 ? ar q<qr� /F �' �6, 7 %- A , 7 fe/4 off /74 oe , r& ,j1 .40 (continued on back) TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: •TILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: DATE: /2'1 4'.; / qr— COMMENTS (Describe w completed duritg the day, any problems and their solutions) I ff A r r Ved/ O n S i L a4- aQ Ghtnl9 v- putS� 1 - Yhe•isv a,pi • • - ia.. . 4 - • o. "ru / • - -k & (3) - 4 - Kvt - e_ ono cl2.r.e 4esis :1,_,/ ,-, ' V C, T -leak 1 T SC a i / l Y I - . V-em � p COtr sp�. t cuci t I C A � p bv.._ - � � JO =Od.Fu i�_1�� (e,Fd- nCciti p . ' 10.0\ ,noi tr)C,u ` % kr' 1- r 4 0 A- -'00 Au■ d I..r .- t ve n v% Sill a' M tn° hi-- . .. C lerz) uWa C ry _AY- 1 .: - • • . _. ._ • Shy \te- ktt r 4( 191-0 b)l' / 0A / / / i� .. .� G• - ( • • Q C 'i S T eLL vc+ C G `K'VJ/�J i J/J� ! - . v. • �Q • _ \ \ ` ` `n r S u- J t�+, .d-LI 10 Vet'. l a 10 tar �K$� L - 4a G'W W.. tit -__ t.. ecfi f.,_ ) ae- 9r2 % W\ ,M1 vn,.., o - -1QQe 1. i` T1,e- ay Nett J - e /`s.rr� - p 1G,cPw.rt.. 1 0 -V'I . fo".✓SG. 4 S0. --p uJ2S_�' Gt' (/,/�� `` 115, I I e 7 u- Cr.'.. -0.1 be_ C,.t G a v10 vGCQwc s Imo, p �P eA -?-ltr {^ . p' 1 detn_c ; - s r L1 tJe• S;' Li rdlict r ✓ 1°C. T L L s_5) u� 4 - te 1 c,) \� # a Q,ese v L\ ava &4 a- ,.�9 S SDC, P4 � 11 \fie ti po,r�3, bare_ U`evA t_te iaSCt. -. c1) de SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. ea,.rl AGRA E&E FI$[�HEPRESENTATI 14-ew4.0... AGRA E &E Field Representative ` AGRA E&E Project Manager / Contractor's Representative Date Continued ❑ WEATHERA (� r 1 C LO . 01 tvvt�,t . AL 4L co.... N PROJECT N W2, vev weak_ D .?A PROJECT No. 1.2 - ! 311 FIELD REPORT No. a 3 LOCATIO At DATE G p / /"- / [ ARRIVAL TIME 12 30, PAGE �7 / OF DAY OF WEEK SSMTWQ /J T Q a' Vole. ✓ £? ` t rkh "t0. CLIENT O� WNER \ )e v. k tLL �j CLIENT OR OWNERS R P ESENTATIVE / PHONE No. Q SvA aealnso— GENERAL CO2 ACTOR J GG CONZ[iACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. � ��iL1 „t SUBCONTRACTOR �a aJ ( SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. ea,.rl AGRA E&E FI$[�HEPRESENTATI AGRE P MANAGER ED v WEATHERA (� r 1 C LO . 01 tvvt�,t . AL 4L co.... N EQUIPMENT USED (� n C - e&v - �.exQs t.e% 1‘ t IS.n. kill dvu L &AGRA Earth & Environmental AGRA Earth & Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS VARIATION FIELD FROM ' DISTANCE ' DRY FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS TEST ELEV. BELOW MATL DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR - TEST No. METHOD LOCATION (FEET) GRADE TYPE (PCF) ( %) ( %) ( %) FAIL I i +Ye it N� ' IaNA e J .q.Yt n NG✓ hint ..2 ,- �k 11 � rc�.a► s FIELD REPORT No. 14-Bt s1 -�.y 2 ,JLla•a Avea, / 2S' E. v-F'Sala&c.w e"5 r . ,.s 7 ' Ai.o{ ' • • 3 g + " 3 4 ■ . k n4 Aut., So W 4 ' Sahnc.e t ter hint t Z' Seoc q.8 - i.9 N 4.4 a„ WS. R1..n.rlane 13,4113 . z iii-52 — (P1.0 — r _i_ • law Avc.., /00 'E.°. sal... twee /0 C. t0. ..a Atm.,. IS'W of Sa lwvn ka' u.v lw nc, � ..�f ' Al. o s .,b .. 143.L Z. — — 9Z. 6 9 2.1 — ta«a /}a. 3S E. of S..a Om. lan+E tin t' ..dta.•a Qift •, J SO w . o Snn 1C. 21 ue.- 1. 91.3 — P +�dl4 Ave, , AV 50 6.1.1 . c` 5 A I& .4.1 'ant , nA ' S. .-.• ' c Pi — — ,n `' T . tans , 2-5 'if a Sa w•on ✓ )a -e (I s'.. _ ' / / � ^ " 1a...t A} )6o j ai. oCSvn.let Qau. lam ' I Z dw..a Ave., 5 wall.. YL"n -la1.t fi ' -, u. 6, ,.)�.we .13.' - 13, / - II 1 ^ C "draw; Ave., e. a ]a lw+mo. "1Vt.- Ia.. t w." 4 '5. A). vl.11.w I * ) * 157ttes - . .� PT-A1 ' T NC '"I'•eS Oµ r �_ PERCENT COMPACTION BAS ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 AB • • B C. MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 .I , /c,_ OTHER 1 'VA.51 ID ON: SPECIFICATION: ❑ 90% D 698 ❑ 95% D 698 O p ,T El 90% D 1557 SYYL D 1557 'ABC A /t" OTHER 7 TEST NUMBER MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. (%) y([�/� 2V Z /V �� // •+ C. / DT DENSITY TEST RT.RETEST TEST METHOD A• /. ' 3 a 7 't ✓I II 0 NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC a SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) �, \ AGRA E &E Project Manager (Initials) AGRA E &E Field Rep. Contractors Rep. (Initials) Continued ❑ (Initials)5'1Nr --- PROJECT N J . i +Ye it PROJECT No. FIELD REPORT No. DATE - /'9 // 4 PAGE a OF ' e AGRA Thrth & Environmental 5 • AGRA Each 8 Environmental, Inc. (Rev. ]54) DAILY FIELD REPORT COMMENTS (Describe work completed durthg the day, any pioblems and their soIutions) ' VV o - Li-e ._ ell- Lt., -ac Tot.. o•' Base covv Plac�o( jV\ SMcekc P.ivev Lau,P ehh -ovice avow (vtcttcti.,,, Ave (• /30 "F+) 414 0 I SuIIA40i, 2tv L.ct,t e eni at tct voaciw(t j Sec}to&t s Lowt,, ot-• Pte , Li ( (,ve ,, SLe#45s A - , f , eti 1 - were. ., ,, I , ssQ .. So v,n i rep«r / °,tuclu„,G co. (0 "-pact-;o, (s N2ed cc- 1(-Nc+ A lot ( 5a[&,,oh 2t�, v Lott- e . - ARRIVAL TIME Z i I S gasta Th., ouv olnevv6,4 c.4 "a s4-110, / if 'is ouv 0 Id -. +I- p b•se c. v - 4- L-- 1'(,t• , / L ov s eKcfi4o4 15 Cen- S #vi(-l4 /'-t atCen-tiscahse and S eci ti +tnh s Gov t4spL,c- lJ- plcte e . _p CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA V E&E FIELD REPRESENTATIVE - GV; ta_Lh AGRA E&E PROJECT MANAGER (Ob Av(n.ofa WEATHER SO cl eav t o br d f 4 AGRA E &E Field AGRA E &E Project Manager Representative Contractor's Representative Date i /i y / 41-5- Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME Rw ZwJ at".(a 3rlcA 4Ji • PROJECT No. 1Z - 13 1) FIELD REPO No. LOCATION DATE �/ !1 — /Y -gS PAGE / OF a ._ _.. ARRIVAL TIME Z i I S DAY OF WEEK • S S C W T F CLIENT OR OWNER �// Dec( L' (roV5l Q CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA V E&E FIELD REPRESENTATIVE - GV; ta_Lh AGRA E&E PROJECT MANAGER (Ob Av(n.ofa WEATHER SO cl eav EQUIPMENT USED ,AGRA ¶arth & Environmental AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS VARIATION FIELD FROM DISTANCE DRY FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS TEST ELEV BELOW MAIL DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. METHOD LOCATION (FEET) GRADE TYPE (PCF) ( %) ( %) ( %) FAIL '. FIELD REPORT No. Z iq 5 n41 kt. r2:11/ le ( tie EN-i 1 DATE ) 1 1 /1 t 7 /ets PAGE a OF a 139 I S 6 / ©o P 2. Shciv River lc,„ et + 1 mo' 132.9 4.1 `IS,S F' 3 I INfwtit tol 61k3 Sa N.os, atver Lai, e. 133.3 6.7 46.1 Salwlv Rive (y,., . f Lo + 1611[ I 132.3 6. 1 9.5;t P 5 S aiwtn, ewe r Lets, e mat L °4- z 81k1 IP.1,I 6,9 96.6 P PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON: SPECIFICATION: ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 ❑ 90% D 698 ❑ 95% D 698 ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 ❑ 90% 0 1557 ❑ 90% D 1557 ❑ OTHER ❑ OTHER TEST NUMBER MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) / y 6v. I Bas( CS . 1 38,7 6. DT= DENSITY TEST RT = RETEST TEST METHOD N = NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1558) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) AGRA E &E Field Rep. C O. —1-- AGRA E&E Project Manager (Initials) Contractor's Rep. (Initials) Continued ❑ (Initials) PROJECT NAME RIvevww1lc 2,4 alad 3ra Add PROJECT No. 17 FIELD REPORT No. Z iq DATE ) 1 1 /1 t 7 /ets PAGE a OF a AG ?arth & Environmental AGRA Eanh 8 Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT COMMENTS (Describe work sdJTan during the day, any problems and thei s) 3 �) : - 6 6 L s kc completed ir r I A n/r��vr„ On ,J,... a - 4 C.hrvri rzpu.J'L 4 inc.,; HELD REPORT ? 71, PAGE `� / OF °f DAY OF WEEK S S M T €! F A is t o / n tt i q n I Sa I pi. c. n ( mot. _ la I-` t a - S i m 't.4 - W , aV-u. u) oc I U v. I o v'l_✓n 7 I z - � �',A� n � /_,-i c. . la, d� Kit b te I a - ��la J m o -tPn c . 1 4., n 4 7t /S - Ativi, oJ r\.e Ini Vim, (. k o—c ?c c.U4S�t Cu �(X ' FCC I 4-I- ?Joe) a _ v lP , e__sne. _ , CLIENT ORO ER PA Ind k. o-� 6rc1w �n,,, ,.rel- ___ / A 4- 7:30 A, a Th9 'CA /n0 Vrp.lo G v,_a l a. js1 1 l a t'r i n rr. 4- o v , T— r •,. 44 Rg_5_IAAJ2. -i La vt-P A20 .--1-1. o+— ._r_in . 4 C r a ..► . 11,, k - —r � W v.4 /1/4)0 /O v`FUL o —L-.w Ta i f • . ? 1 veictaie • 5 as / Q -ke-- L C T Q_l !e AL / da _ a 5 ptca 1_ Let.... IP A A. 4- as S ✓.a Ile 12i_ la,,,e a _- 9 s14,. ..._b <' a - 44 SUBCOEQRACT REPRESENTATIVE /PHONE No. -'0. p Sakw.c..., 't .rty I vHP 5�In 5 eo� T...tlLk.__ Au€ 4- 9r (OAn. 1 kt co- J. r AGRA E&E FIELD �EpRESENTATIVE C A A S& �au't ^ i ca— .0L— c s+Fivn.b is a 4- "ate O .w-. 6„. r t/c✓�.p ----,,o , is `C✓ / 3 tat IJewa J of r' /`A'3, i rR4- ,5_ L a /0:i 5 A WEATHER � OUTV5 rre _ 1 , 4 h AGRA E &E Project Manager C � "� \ AGRA E &E Field Representative t C - Contractor's Representative \/ Date , Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME R I i k 12 3 �) : - 6 6 L s PROJECT No. � 2 - �3 �, HELD REPORT ? 71, PAGE `� / OF °f DAY OF WEEK S S M T €! F LOCATION rryye� I� � /�/ d JPA V14 1- R . Ca �� ,p ( )fa t^4 A'e DATE (j // /S /5 ARRIVAL TIME 7 - f414^ . CLIENT ORO ER PA Ind k. II �`�` // CLIE OR OWNER'SR RESENTATIVE / PHONE No.. SCr / PHONE No. 'PivVt w CO CON CTOR•S REPRESENTATIVE d -ea vi GENERAL CO CTO SUBCONTRACTOR ` v`I SUBCOEQRACT REPRESENTATIVE /PHONE No. -'0. a �rP a AGRA E&E FIELD �EpRESENTATIVE C A A AGRA E NA E/JJA`/ 4 r-ne. Cl/r / / / J / WEATHER � OUTV5 rre /n� Cxlaa 1 , 4 EQUIPMENT USE \ . / c' n/D� 2YalbaS am I -L.t i_Swr, ol ua.1 AGRA Earth & Environmental DAILY FIELD REPORT AGRA Earn, & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS VARIATION FIELD FROM DISTANCE -CRT. FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS TEST ELEV. BELOW MAIL DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. METHOD LOCATION (FEET) GRADE TYPE (PCF) ( %) ( %) ( %) FAIL I l IJ Sa ),.s. , gt,ve In vel 50'u/•0F SCI kv.v L"l Vi e. ieekei5 Q C t P a v I/JQ 1i ? . AA, 143.1 tg U Sal.vcn .seive.1 1AV.i; )oo'S.oFS..(..o., tfc• Ig.wed3'A1.oFci it I'IZ.7 3 0 .%,..,.. I AV,e 4 'Al. o-r it " 193.5 A) S n l w•cn 'Q1 vc.. k,. r; / 5 • E. o+ 5. P4 ve v- lane! S's.o4 " W3.1 5. tal,nev. lave; 17 sit. o {5., 1...r., [)u v Ja .c u,/'� . 3' S• o { ' pt 3. � 1� l!� N / S,.a a e V I soak; io el . o.-4- NA Auo, 7'W. of E. S • 1 1 „ 7 /42.! Ka N 60411.e e ev\ay.ei5> Au. 4 a . SW, ICe ielVt.- lave Z 0 cc). Orr..11n:,a Am.t . 1 143./ " q 1 jal .ev v cv kW e; s a t.�Tnn..n AL,. d S " W3.i I , ! V 1 At y a �=.ew 12S ••••.- Jana; I S'S. o FS.,µ)...• ►At G < c 147. 7 PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON: SPECIFICATION: ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 ❑ 90% D 698 ❑ 95% D 698 ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM � D1557 ❑ 90% 015577 ❑ 90%01 OTHER F1 tC j/ . vC� "Q , OTHER / //1 er / e % te TEST NUMBER MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) ,( A/ t. fp alga k 6, µ �,sp co DENSITY TEST RT = RETEST TEST METHOD NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) . SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM 0 2937) AGRA E &E Field Rep. (Initials) 3 M AGRA E &E Project Manager (Initials) Contractors Rep. (Initials) Continued CI PROJECT NAME e,..ey t . . 4 M IL PROJECT No. . 1D -13 DATE FIELD REPORT . a �° PAGE -el" OF P a v I/JQ 1i ? . @' � N n 't.a Ake. AGRA E arth & Environmental DAILY FIELD REPORT AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS VARIATION FIELD FROM - DISTANCE -err. FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS TEST ELEV. BELOW MAIL DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. METHOD LOCATION (FEET) GRADE TYPE (PCF) ( %) ( %) ( %) FAIL 1 N Sq►,wnw .- a t; SOW -P -A V.a.. '•.e.. /44.,t. �J Imo. P�� . F �1 A/c 1 " " Iqs.► PIZ.9 P13,5 W3.1 S G .1 12:'{ ITS gin TZ4 OF R t P q 1 U ) ) Sa1..c vb., 1...e,; /o0'a- PF3w1..pn ewer IA. at 4 3 .0 -V 3 atwt.•Iil.ev 1AV.e••7ck+'7.o4 sat..., ten"- 1 •tt e . 1 o -C • 41 Al $a vac., • we. - \4'r; ► E. P 54. .ww Awn,- ►awtc 4 S's art 5 i I Sale•.e.' e•vev lave; 17S'E•o1 n).v Ate Jal..•e • 3' S. o c� ' N J 3.S 92.1 ` I N W 5 .vt Y TANav Ia.e,; -1o'A1.o- 4- - C- L1ta Aue- 1 7'. of E. (' ...r�t1).01 11 i .7 p� n "le—(� I 1.1 ..a e- 4 S.w1Ge elver \ a..e; 50 e). ° 'C ri.�a At \ , wz. 9 92.3 P cr k) s..aY-e lelve. -laee; Z o'M. PFT•..►la..n .04-e• t S' E•P- . ` 4...I.t..e .1 " 14134 14134 Ha. 6 I'-4 gait - P P q I ki Salvo-en C1vw lawc; 3o' s- Pi - 7 .: �r4w du. (t ' . o-� 1d 1 a�•Ka * Ia hl; I S'S. PT r X.. 41 n Aa t li ±eE-. 1 1 wz.7 yt2- f PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON: SPECIFICATION: ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 ❑ 90% D 698 ❑ 95% D 698 ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR AST , - D 11557 IN 90% D 15577 ❑ D1557 %OTHER ?1 Ce bat -41y%/ OTHER (22 er r A // TEST NUMBER MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) J / t. 2 33 ps. Wfv'1'I 6µ.-St L// II J.! 10? 1a DENSITY TEST RT = RETEST TEST METHOD - Z NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937 AGRA E &E Field Rep. (Initials) V AGRA E &E Project Manager ( Initals) Contractofs Rep. (Initials) Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME - PROJECT No. FIELD REPORT . F D / I --I5- / S PAGE o OF R ovveV ?J. l.-.. -t.J1 --4 i , AGRA Earth & Environmental AGRA Earth 6 EnNronmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS VARIATION FIELD FROM DISTANCE - •!Rh FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS TER ELEV. OELOW MATT- DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. METHOD LOC (FEET) GRADE TYPE (PCFI 1!) 1%) oh., FAIL I (� I 4.44') Le,..._ Cai..... Rywr la wiT- 7 W.ortra ,,. ve v / - i IC I. Cr FIELD REPORT 0.7 A '3.1 Aft II N .1 14 (IO P1375 933. I. LY3. . ..... /j Z "1-4 ¶13 ern 'j {.�. Z • in y/ _. 17-3 n Ca -2 ...- il 1 'Q .._...... LJ._ 3 y 5 �5 . JI , I..4.. M• 1, Ma_ BOO E•• Sahebs e QKr I4.L. 13 %0f .o 4. IQ 1 . t ( .«..., PION- �ee�t. s. 1•714, eke._ M . 1 '0. ,r - `• a ...an , e.. 4ar; 1 E. a to oft w.. ..er 11t.A%JS oft ..___ -. -. N la.c s....• aver Is 6.r; 273 GAS. /am., m 10 at 4_3ts int; 1 , / l0 " IV ei — 1 Ewa* .av twwt; 10 "al . y AL!- r 7 E.s. t .� stz. I N -r]he� 6w 1la ewe.- 1.,.4; 50 . • a.A. r. t I. � j 1 " A — c' S..a ten"- IC1 I.r; Z e'A). gr M •. t S R1w./w . ave, a i- 7.wln..r Au. d '�y o-( u sad p 1 p 1 P /O r e . mot.. IA -.- tans; 1 s's..rzwd,.... A.(. t .F. a C E to 1 _ PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON. SPECIFIC) ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASIA 0096 LI 9M. D tee I. I 96.4 o 990 ❑ MODIFIED PROCTOR n } l AM 001557 ❑ 10% 0 '55' [1 901.0'557 ' p .OTHER ? V..V•vy VOTM ER A Ot, e.ce . . / TEST NUMBI R MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCFI MOIST. (70 \ ) 332 � � f�.� [(.A l(Jta►'i j 4 -' .. // ( OT DENSITY T,6T RT. RETEST TEST METHQD .. .0.])... CDNUCLEAR (REM D 2922} ac . 9ANO Colt (ASTM O 1806, OC . DRIVE CYIJIDER IARTM D 29371 AGRA E&E Field Aep. (Inttlala)Y AGRA E&E Project Manager (Initials Contractors Rap. (Initials Contlnu0d O ... PROJECT NAME A Ut D I It -a (� I 4.44') Le,..._ PROJECT N.. h) — 13 / FIELD REPORT 0.7 %.x.., / 0 � I jF w, - a `�NTF m.....Q / /M^c DATE —/ St / .] p / PAGE OF R ✓1 C. I 1 /L'd /1y`!7 Ub:12 17U74t12U2102 AGKA E&E,SKUKANE, WA PAGE 02 A Earth & Em *Wet ERIN a Em90mm DAILY FIELD REPORT A I ronmental Inc. (Rev. lap INSPECTOR'S DAILY . REPORT • INSPECTOR: PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: WEATHER VISITORS: t ta4,.i!> ACPN,ti— A.M.: rot, Cocrc- wwDY, SUPERINTENDENT: OPERATORS: 3 LABORERS: OTHERS: /q EQUIPMENT USED: - a,,,,fc -, quip; —O,4-8 ntc.aL- c An-, !3u A<P -r rSZ4i of%F REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT PAGE WORK PERIOD: - -;oo A.M. P.M. P.M.: FOREMAN: L. Ott.-Li9-C , 1 77c4•44.? 'TZuvGS ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS PROJECT NO.: ot52 g SURVEYORS: 49r FLAGMEN: ..& TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: A.M. P.M. STREETS CLOSED: TIME: WORK: i vin UMJ sire G 4,/ rts 2 P s fat 'CriL.ta 4Cr..i g ia? . f' T i r ,4 -'4 r> TL>Sn n (continued on back) TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: . •TILILTY /PROPERTY. DAMAGE: CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: OF _ DATE: it / cc t PROJECT NAME J v . a► _ vC ,flA / i. J PROJECT No DATE _//- /6 R5 ARRIVAL TIM 7_ y 6 ANl FIELD REP • .o. I. PAGE OR—? DAY OF WEEK SSMT LOCATION 0 t Q4 /Jr) 3 C CLIENT OR OWNER n N0 o t%M 3 /70-4.1.42Q CLIENTpR OWNER'S REPRE ENTATIV / PHONE No. ` ( t—snnti GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONTRACTO�RR''S�-g2 ATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR /����� ��� ,w V•w v'Vy% SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA EKE Fl EP SENTATIVE AGRA EKE P OJECT NAGER I A WEATHEf� 4 16 C) EQUIPMENT USED P 2 0 AG R A °.arth & Environmental L/ COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day; any problems and their solutions) AGRA E &E Field Representative AGRA Earth 8 Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 7/94) , :col • Contractors Representative DAILY FIELD REPORT 7: 4 /6 - 441 ,e, AGRA E &E Project Manager k 0 Date Continued TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED " TYPE OF STRUCTURE INSPECTED 0 RESTEEL REINFORCED CONCRETE REINFORCED MASONRY SHOTCRETE OTHER (Spealy)_ [] STRUCTURAL STEEL FABRICATION 9 STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION ❑ EXPANSION BOLTS /� FIRE PROOFING Rctc FOOTINGS ❑ AUGER CAST PILING ❑ GRADE BEAMS ❑ WALLS 9 OTHER (SpedN) COLUMNS El LAB -0N -GRADE II STRUCTURAL GRADE ❑ POST TENSIONED SLAB DATE iR - /6 9, S DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES PROJECT NAME /�`vV ^ 't /`J n /( � �\ ^ _ /' / S, - �T,F'��,ri�"N`•i�t PCTR I FIELD RSipRyIJO. PAG d)` / DF LOCATION � OA. • " � d � U r CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) 1 o DATE iR - /6 9, S DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES PERMIT NUMBER WE� /-' -O CLIENT OR OWNER i `YU -' - /� �{ -//t _j `` J ENGINEER AIR TEMP. GENERAL CONTRACTOR ) / r GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) ARCHITECT CONCRETE MORTAR TYPE OF MO SLUMP (IN.) AIR CONTENT (5 MATERIAL TEST REPO No. OF SAMPLES 7 / - /i) C L F SLUMP (IN.) CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) 1 o DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES \ TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED MORTAR TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME AIR TEMP. CONCRETE SUPPLIER Q p �j MIX N lQ0� MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. o ,� SLUMP (IN.) AIR CONTENT (5 DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) COO No. OF SAMPLES 7 / - /i) C L F TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED / CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) 1 o TIME * • ?a AM %krcf -!,& AIR TEMP. 1- 1‘ O 1 O AG RA Earth & Environmental SPECIFIC LOCATION(S) GRIDS REMARKS �i� ' f2�a uti. c�.n m� ✓yc CONTINUED ❑ YES [7i4; Inspector— ALL ITEMS ABOVE WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH +, :.BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPROVED PLANS IF NO, EXPLAIN AGM Earth A'EnN)gAmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) MATERIAL FIELD REPORT Date GROUT SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPOR .. SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) \ No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME AIR TEMP. 1 O AG RA Earth & Environmental SPECIFIC LOCATION(S) GRIDS REMARKS �i� ' f2�a uti. c�.n m� ✓yc CONTINUED ❑ YES [7i4; Inspector— ALL ITEMS ABOVE WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH +, :.BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPROVED PLANS IF NO, EXPLAIN AGM Earth A'EnN)gAmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) MATERIAL FIELD REPORT Date . i,34` ' L ABORATORYpD/1TA „,„ s x xz2` '1� :; F trt- DATE SPECIMANS CAST DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED LAB ID No. TEST DATE FIELD CURE AGE (DAYS) SIZE (IN) AREA (SO IM WEIGHT (LBS) MAX LOAD (LBS) STRENGTH (PSI) SET No. LAB TECH c 9-9G i ( 1 4 3 �T TIC ^ KEr t12 3/3/ L V A 6x/2_ 28. AA , / AIR '7 cC qt,2 y b _351D c li PERMIT NUMBER WEATyIER `/ /( /C' � � Zj CLIENT OR OWNER 3 L4lt �� ENGINEER DESIGN STRENGTH (4 an a PSI @ DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS 4 6 � / a / � TOTAL CU. YDS, PLACED l[, / YDS3 AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS 6- G A LOAD SIZE i n YDS3 • ARCHITECT REMARKS �a FIELD,DATA” SUPPLIER ( sA' 2._ 7Ci / C MIX No. 0 PLANT No. 9_0 JOB MIX / G � CONCRETE GROUT MORTAR FLEX BEAMS PRISMS O GROUTED UNGROUTED ■ OTHER GRIDS ' TEMP. (Dog. F) . YIELD/UNIT TIME TRUCK N No. % AIR SLUMP CONC REMARKS WEIGHT �j 3 � 579 o. �T TIC ^ KEr t12 3/3/ L V A C 70 , / AIR '7 cC PERMIT NUMBER WEATyIER `/ /( /C' � � Zj CLIENT OR OWNER 3 ENGINEER DESIGN STRENGTH (4 an a PSI @ DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS 4 6 � / a / � TOTAL CU. YDS, PLACED l[, / YDS3 AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS 6- G A LOAD SIZE i n YDS3 PROJECT NAME / � t A t_ PLACEMENT AREA FOOTINGS GRIDS f ` o 11 Yn ` "'/v(`^�'j 'f PRWE O 7 3 L ! TEST REPQRT Na, v OO F LOCATION REMARKS _ ..G 0 J V`A DATE / C - - _ [ 6 C PAGE REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. � (G PERMIT NUMBER WEATyIER `/ /( /C' � � Zj CLIENT OR OWNER 3 ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR / / C • ARCHITECT `T t_ PLACEMENT AREA FOOTINGS GRIDS I SLCL JLij - 1 /� X440 -/6 Alt. • WALLS ❑ COLUMNS GRADE BEAMS ■ rECK SLAB PILINGS OTHER REMARKS REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. � (G 1 AGRA Earth & Environmental INSPECTOR Reviewed by AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev: 1196) REVIEWED BY ]U ° MATERIAL TEST REPORT Date ( 62 REPORTED BATCH DATA CEMENT TYPE DESIGN MIX No. CEM LBS. F ASH LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. SAND LBS. H2O LBS. ACTUAL ADMIXTURES AIR ENT OZ/CWT WATER ADDED BT LBS. AT LBS. :ITEMS INSPECTED'ARE: ' - o :.aaP +nsc:A�r.cr • NFORMING ❑ NON - CONFORMING TEST M OD ASTM C 39 PASHTO 112 OTHER (Specify) COMPRESSIVE FLEXURAL CONFORMING NONCONFORMING COMMENTS (Describe work completed dung the day, any problems and their solulbns) lieP [Url) ON t or A- - ri Oh) b 5i -1'[)E xf nF onn)C'iPF?F, rcAerrn Cg ETP tom., na4PF'D FF 4-4AsaD■1 C`A j 12 Amps d/J TES' Pen t R opre>_)G C5P ZC)t?,LIA AUF Aron SALMO' -) gulp, AUf. t13rE12EcTtotO. -1- 1AUntCAp DATE 11 -/7 - 95 � "'a 7C - ' L d � C • C . . . '• , b , • — ; 7C • ui n S �F • n • a_ c � _ / IeEW • L . l.l sthe S W.F._ tc-t aat twe, • 41 •-■ Z L • s•' L • .AJ • ��_ • Rt . _ rA.m..i a. - - ■ , 7 P : • :, . • '. , ' Ic • f taw U-) ` � AL e. C& 3Uk r T c.L 0 . J SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA ESE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE 4A )11 t t E 1w2t . AGRA ESE PROJECT MANAGER brit, H9 n( D WEATHER - t /CLoc_ y EQUIPMENT USED AGRA E &E Field Representative OO J2 pA 5 AGRA E&E Project Manager< Contractors Representative Date Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME /� PI (n' 074.)A P Zrz.D 146Dar ),J PROJECT No. ea-rat/ FIELD REPORT No. 0 a7 LOCATION DATE 11 -/7 - 95 PAGE I OF 3 ARRIVAL TIME / //VS DAY OF WEEK SSMTWT& CLIENT OR 0 NENER • O P CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE /PHONE No. 1/E?N . FACCBSOIJ GENERAL CONT CTOR C(}[LTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. eisto SUBCONTRACTOR CP bAkertoii SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA ESE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE 4A )11 t t E 1w2t . AGRA ESE PROJECT MANAGER brit, H9 n( D WEATHER - t /CLoc_ y EQUIPMENT USED 6 AG R A Earth & Environmental AGRA Eadb 8 Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED YN TYPE OF STRUCTURE INSPECTED RESTEEL STRUCTURAL STEEL FABRICATION REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION REINFORCED MASONRY fl EXPANSION BOLTS SHOTCRETE FIRE PROOFING IR OTHER (Specify) 5 r DE tvALa. FOOTINGS U AUGER CAST PILING GRADE BEAMS WALLS M. OTHER (Specify) .S7pe COLUMNS U SLAB -ON -GRADE . STRUCTURAL GRADE ❑ POST TENSIONED SLAB WALK. PERMIT NUMBER i /awlcAv C L I E N T O R O W N E R J � // Y >3AW.S LEy ENGINEER PROJECT NAME // KlNlo-7 A NYIA1k' ' +, F 30- AD nO PROJECT No. Aa'l3ll FIELD R EPORT No. a.7 LOCATION DATE ii-17- 9S- PAGE c.z. OF 3 MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. Q PERMIT NUMBER i /awlcAv C L I E N T O R O W N E R J � // Y >3AW.S LEy ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTORn�77 `✓ lA.) ARCHITECT CONCRETE SPECIFIC LOCATION(S) SUPPLIER AC4n E MIX N 7?O 1 GRIDS At t MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. Q ' e ; ms . , ANa i4 p n,LA.• .7.: etral m i SLUMP (IN.) l.' L/ AIR CONTENT 5, 6 DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) 3 etOen, l k}P. !Orr crTLns.) No. OF SAMPLES 3 TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED 3 0 REMARKS CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) -Th0 TIME 1,0 AIR TEMP. 42a0 G AG RA Earth & Environmental Ei YES NO ALL ITEMS:ABOVE.WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT' APPROVED PLANS IF NO, EXPLAIN Inspector 42J 2 O rni l ^ „ 476 2 AGRA Earth A Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 1151) MATERIAL FIELD REPORT GROUT SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME AIR TEMP. MORTAR TYPE OF MORTAR MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED MORTAR TEMP. (Dog F.) TIME AIR TEMP. Date «-11 -95' SPECIFIC LOCATION(S) GRIDS At t aar-er7E n r Dtc F S,i cmo,J &Jet- A JE . ' e ; ms . , ANa i4 p n,LA.• .7.: etral m i S . P T.NDNANA DNA A O etOen, l k}P. !Orr crTLns.) REMARKS CONTINUED G AG RA Earth & Environmental Ei YES NO ALL ITEMS:ABOVE.WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT' APPROVED PLANS IF NO, EXPLAIN Inspector 42J 2 O rni l ^ „ 476 2 AGRA Earth A Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 1151) MATERIAL FIELD REPORT GROUT SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME AIR TEMP. MORTAR TYPE OF MORTAR MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED MORTAR TEMP. (Dog F.) TIME AIR TEMP. Date «-11 -95' F' . ` `F SUPPLIER ACm6 MIX No. 190 c PLANT No. cab JOB MIX VI CONCRETE ■ GROUT MORTAR FLEX BEAMS PRISMS GROUTED UNGROUTED OTHER DATE ti- 17 -75 TEMP. (Deg. F) YIELD/UNIT TIME TRUCK No. TICKET No. %AIR SLUMP CONC AIR WEIGHT G , 0 5 (4?3343 5..0 g. 0 70 loa - r � Of [ ASTMC39 ❑ AASHTO T22 • OTHER (Specify) (- ( . $ DESIGN STRENGTH 3aoo PSI @ a g DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS 411 TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED 3 YOS AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS cc (O LOAD SIZE / 0 YDS ROJECT NAM A erect 2#91, r a,UD F ,,30.o ADDirc o -J PROJECT No. /.Q-131 / TEST REPORT No. 0 3 LOCATION - DATE ti- 17 -75 PAGE 3 0F 3 FIELD CURE PERMIT NUMBER ER e z0 c f CLIENT OR OWNER ' / 2040 F 4i vaisC.E� ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR Y —I / Ci ezoiJ ARCHITECT st z.:� s •E "LABORATORY DATA: S `.... . DATE SPECIMANS CAST DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED LAB ID No. TEST DATE FIELD CURE AGE (DAYS) SIZE (IN) AREA (SO IN) WEIGHT (LBS) MAX LOAD (LBS) STRENGTH (PSI) SET No. LAB TECH TEST METHOD ..4.-,al ( � 7 II � 10 • - r � Of [ ASTMC39 ❑ AASHTO T22 • OTHER (Specify) (- ( . $ 1 - /S (9 G ® COMPRESSIVE FLEXURAL CONFORMING NONCONFORMING REMARKS 0 Earth & Environmental PLACEMENT AREA ❑ FOOnNGs ▪ WALLS COLUMNS El GRADE BEAMS El SLAB/DECK El SLAB ❑ PILINGS R1 OTHER Reviewed by • M Cam" AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) GRIDS /4MJDTe Ar T,uDfA Roo afL4taOU RLuoe A i7 /AJ [,7c . 6 e • S REMARKS! REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. INSPECTOR S REVIEWED BY Date /Ib MATERIAL TEST REPORT REPORTED BATCH DATA CEMENT TYPE DESIGN MIX No. GEM LBS. F ASH LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. SAND LBS. H2O LBS. ACTUAL ADMIXTURES AIR ENT OZ/CWT WATER ADDED BT LBS. AT LBS. ALL DEMS INSPECTED ARE•";. f CONFORMING NON - CONFORMING INSPECTOR'S • INSPECTOR: PROJECT: - 2,-Irm,,F>n-c.e "%' — ADD CONTRACTOR: WEATHER A.M.: a ._, eapuotr, �!y° VISITORS: SUPERINTENDENT: OPERATORS: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: LABORERS: DY-I 3 - /4-nn 1 ILI /PROPERTY DAMAGE: REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER rte- v J PAGE TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: STREETS CLOSED: TIME: WORK: 4.0424",xn +rta.r 4-1 7 T / Nrit5 L I .. p. /T. Zits' Or r -0- e4716 DAILY REPORT WORK PERIOD: von A.M. P.M.: MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT FOREMAN: SURVEYORS: I -(-.o5 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: PROJECT NO:: i 0' FLAGMEN: ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS A.M. P.M. sl its ,'r n: C . : rrr GonJC � S' ntr 5l tear ZG•-r4ha P-.rwc'rS cyc P.M. (continued on back) OF _ DATE: 1/ / 17 / Of; INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT INSPECTOR: `I ititc.z fjo.o,wt7, PROJECT NO:: c9 PROJECT: /v 31 ,.r1Dni- CONTRACTOR: (14.1AA , zci-i. WORK PERIOD: 4-:k>o A.M. P.M. WEATHER A.M.: Caa ta,tilu1i 36 P.M.: VISITORS: SUPERINTENDENT: OPERATORS: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: LILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE:. MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT LABORERS: FOREMAN: SURVEYORS: FLAGMEN: ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS A TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: •A.M. P.M. STREETS CLOSED: TIME: WORK: e..p_,sui - nw Sir c ov • 77tisT /- �z-P A-on i r7ox lTf,7)??4 Tex_ 94-I17, C , ANA e'. C .Vni?TLS (continued on back) ELL' REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: PAGE _ OF _ DATE: iI / / ; INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT INSPECTOR: - t PROJECT: vs��Uti ,: ' —� teivorno , CONTRACTOR: __Oltrturgfaki r i C 0,0 WORK PERIOD: `�; A.M. P.M. WEATHER A.M.: 0Ax.0 ,,c - 3.; P.M.: VISITORS: SUPERINTENDENT: 'Tx -,0 }�'' OPERATORS: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT LABORERS: FOREMAN: SURVEYORS: FLAGMEN: ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS PROJECT NO:: lZv( -- TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: A.M. P.M. STREETS CLOSED: TIME: WORK: 67A_ S4 - tr C-e* Ai LOA'S o,U.Srrgr ak -r - 7Kr 'Pt?). i D ja ro .c Lc 49-r7 c» jS . Dr.; t; e--, = - 3 , istc I S C.CF t i ei Y-P'7 do ..J Tit.4 - " F 7�L �� , rns- l7 I A-i ?rn-c- C •n ' tf; r &/C 5'r �Oc�ritfl. y Srk r 4 1411n. / • (r r vnx.l, 1 3- ° o its cat— F'xA Lam- 7i2. rAlL-s r-14 MLAC4I ✓i erc v,rLr - s7.1D7J < (continued on back) TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: . ILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: . REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: PAGE _ OF DATE: 1 / 7n / t -� INSPECTOR'S DAILY S INSPECTOR: PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: WEATHER A.M.: VISITORS: SUPERINTENDENT: OPERATORS: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: TESTS: P,verweilk - 3 4DDino./. t , rin ,ni e reln �i»'J MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT 7' ? C- arivrTer'nn LABORERS: Y WORK PERIOD: P.M.: ys FOREMAN: SURVEYORS: ./ REPORT ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: A.M. STREETS CLOSED: TIME: WORK: ,1 1 / ' ere/r n.>a t 7u4 / er an 6;71/,,,r) e/frei 41, eery .Lira. - eis f1v0 Fir/ /%i/?re / /," . Z ..Z tai-S , n / rn en/ o - a> 1e..r6r r",-7 /a/ ZT es , C�/r or nn Cr; sc.'»n e- e a r • d f dfed eaten:, PROJECT NO:: 94/S A.M. P.M. FLAGMEN: P.M. a he here/ n/7 ,r%- /4 i %7 GGyre / 4:= 7 Tip flfr ; ear/ 4,s,/,; (continued on back)- e. • r4e earl r " roN WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: "ILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER PAGE OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: DATE: _ ' /t//9c ACCOUNT OF WORK (CONT'D) TIME: WORK: _a.ar' / / . /z/9l - r c ,r / /ec/ Crrinrr.w, (3n/ enrr /i�.rc,4r rr l•dne4 -7 ,{ `..er Qne e�r,ere pet4( , tee tee /Jrrrirec< ,'r rrn //.:» c-r //7 r5s/ /^d r/,t /P 7` n/4/./. / /D.'/C Ant, n /.ir/7irnaed /,'C men Are/ n %err / S �o l �nierec / / erite ,4-4,-1,-/ ere /pit rrt` -awe/ A,, J ,;n4,-n e , ,,, 1 r T" e/t er Vern %annf�rnri nr ZPE e C //eel />e �r Zi C , ,t .ti - eeci/ 7' 1"."r /i2 rn7e/ /e' •1 n 14rn . /ere A 4.5 , f- .gibrA G! 14 clover re 9 -2,21- - -en-", .sn .T_ ,n Y /.eiit G9rcnJ e9 n r INSPECTOR'S DAILY . REPORT INSPECTOR: / y�y/f PROJECT NO.: if !,q PROJECT: igvonr ,o,f, .ZS /J.✓il,f " {i CONTRACTOR: �nm C nnrrefe WORK PERIOD: A.M. WEATHER A.M.: r -- /9.fr Eri P.M.: c. /ter 44r° VISITORS: SUPERINTENDENT: OPERATORS: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: • A.M. P.M. STREETS Ck6SCD Ze2Ca ek . // -ierk C'' % un £ nnc!/� ✓, r./4 /e /i TIME: WORK: // cam /, ,rif nn/ //- *rs Sift/ - � /i0. •f ? tea / li? P.✓J9/J� j eer c / �7/+� 4 .r/i 6CT J ec erO �/k-AMv 97>F oTiee -i TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: / .tea ('pn /mgr! R hev< /h.-J/1 li/�rP rfn�1, / <:� �rher / /0 /rcc nr 9" �iir / - f�ri „�,C /770 T/lni9 //c, ,7(/d y' ” -,:r r n'.✓ rin/` OXC�rvilTO !2:: +77 71 f' " Ice,,ii/!e ,ny /i ern / ATE es4.5 "/A/ 6 J?�-° /Ore _ - e � , 4f -' :•1 Ynr c7f/ ce (continued on back) 'ILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT Jiro l imer n LABORERS: FOREMAN: SURVEYORS: REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: FLAGMEN: ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS P.M. PAGE OF DATE: 33 /Z ? /9G 6040( COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day; any problems and their solutions) ^ � . . .5 >` ! / Y — C2 y _ —6.--Lit t i•tf �— l G_Yf A..._ L ..-C-64 . v L L._L/ ' . a' _/ d / 'A I t ` — l� / / CLIENT OR ER an '} 1 CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE /PHONE No. V.Q r 3 CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. O a V SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE /PHONE No. / 1 I SUBCONTRACTOR IF A (] /A 1 v .. MY" ..�. siALL / �..__ ____ A J' vtX—l' . (J ^ °!� Q A P A 4 c,--.4 �..Vl . f tr LL- .� , ,, / ( t / - � a A / 4 Jo, n.. Y�r of b_.,,..„ - t4_#- - t - L -EL / 1 r / _ / A S Ia Lam_ • a. . / i ,,. a J —��i 4 �I 1 14•1 — (4( ., ,�.. `... e/ 011— AGRA E &E Field Representative ( ` S AGRA E&E Project Manager" / ilti___ Contractor's Representative Date 3/2-5//4_____ Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME I -, r lverw4llh 2 4 PROJECT No. 1 - 130 FIELD REPORT No. Z 8 LOCATION I b 4 C er Q-- S,� :C�s,- DATE I - ' P AGE 1 OF Z ARRIVAL TIME /// /•Ivo I DAY OF WEEK SSMT WoF CLIENT OR ER an '} 1 CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE /PHONE No. V.Q r 3 CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. O a V SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE /PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTOR_ K. SUBCONTRACTOR AGRA ESE FIEL R RESEIITATIV AGRA E &E PROJECTxXANAGER `2),.3\2 n r vt o l a u4< S & t ,,A WEATHER r Lea EQUIPMENT USED ,AGRA A Earth & Environmental DAILY FIELD REPORT AGRA Earth & Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 7/94) SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS VARIATION FIELD FROM DISTANCE DRY FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS TEST ELEV. BELOW MATL DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. ME1THOD LOCATION (FEET) GRADE TYPE (PCF) ( %) ( %) ( %) FAIL / IV / \ 1 )cot4e J ''ti n RI rtir L n bAse (ui — ) 132.' 4.7 / ! �./ 57 qz.4. `_ — /-� f Z N �J II - ! b ) z 1 5,4 Sze b61 cr SF �l C I ouLfionc 0 o 1 I 12.6 — 94,z - 130 — P P 3 A) SCI o k...L 4 16,,, 4 ,ocIlu. 12 130 7 42 S) 7,s 4 Al L / s N 1I 6 1 12911 1, N i o 1 1Z8�7.3U.i_ P ® 3 /1 ID 4.' PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON: SPECIFICATION: • STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 Li 9 D 698 • 95% D 698 MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 L�7 D 1557 ❑ 90% D 1557 ❑ OTHER ❑ OTHER O O MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) TEST liBER ^/ !! 2 V . laa'S-G CO ur3 e 13 Y1 (, DT= DENSITY TEST RT = RETEST TEST METHOD I N = NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 29377)) / AGRA E &E Field Rep. AGRA E&E Project Manager (Initials) Contractor's Rep. (Initials) Continued ❑ (Initials) PROJECT NAME 71 - II . , Vt ,- waI /( 2nd 4- -3rJ A Ji,i)o.ts PROJECT No. /2 - /5f I FIELD REPORT No. 2 fS DATE -5 1 ' v114 PAGE 2 OF Z 'Te Earth & Environmental AGRA Earth 8 Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day: any problems and theirs solutions) 4 vv.vecl O ii-%i4? + LLt ptcir C1nLA fs"I C Oil ureic, Ica (di Co jam' (chip, _ -t� v woi_b 4 wee, a i d t aUc( .4ve,0,i SA(is,ot, I ? LeL" 4 1o4 o Y cl C 0 rl (.V of 0k0 -.e. -k “de -S lr le lec' Mt+ Leery Pk If •wd RVv(e Hot..c, oC I1 ctl,kFac, E i,yY. !H(_, The weve cok ce K_ I t vN ✓LU/ of CAv+l'it.✓cvic ✓,der tLP MW civ4 WE C)vher CVVb cvd_4j,', _._. 6. 10 0" S e s ;Se w,�1 t by [kw f Gov 9 a5 . aI4 elect CO,,dvt p latcf...e,., +. J bu {eskd FL Litt -1-4-, (II c.yl 0 44) u ... , A Cas+ 3 cyl(„Aae.s• Ii e. c,ffa,cLec( l•Yla4-ev,ctI Frelc! k— pov pvesei -rts the vesvlfs o {C - {fs +r-, . FYI ix ( 1311. We_ o bsevVe o { ii, area, o - f cot,cre --le kik wxs les 4 6 TN . +IA;tic Ave 4-v ov- evplc.ce,...em+ o{ g b 14- 'Ott a ra 14/As Q /oi^9 +i.e bus( Covvre, Tt, apex, g F4- (os w CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE bei, VI e.',s C;d of +I- e 14 - 4 - L plrt - -6 "-w,ck cote -.+c . , . ) AGRA E&E FIELD REPRESENTATIVE b &41.; j i.e. AGRA E &E PROJECT MANAGER R 4 k f,0 Id Eased ok ouv visval n t,tevv44410t , s cu-c1 4-e4i f,,.e. 4-c ' la(tc• -e,-+ ettevc.11 I an , ett/ik,s • , r 4 - - ec lcen -16 -s wj4'l.- i-lne. c4Lr opt 4044 eY(J4lUt^S • EQUIPMENT USED AGRA E &E Field Representative DL t l AGRA E&E Project Manager Contractors Representative Date v y l & Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME (C veZwc,Ii PROJECT No. l FIELD REPORT No I2 -1 u I 2') LOCATION �r 4 I BctvK`cv 4 lt,,('I/bl•1 �`-C DATE I I U PAGE { OF TJ + / Cr / T ARRIVAL TIME DAY OF WEEK ` I i . 0 0 . L S S M T W0F / PHONE No. / PHONE No. CLIENT OR OWNER Q {U In b 11 R“ y CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE klevvi Tu(o �, fp.-, GENERAL CONTRACTOR Cc CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE bei, VI SUBCONTRACTOR C o,%Ane vi SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. 7I ( ,-- Cc, r---€ , -lam AGRA E&E FIELD REPRESENTATIVE b &41.; j i.e. AGRA E &E PROJECT MANAGER R 4 k f,0 Id WEATHER TAO er- ciet,P EQUIPMENT USED I L i AGRA Earth & Environmental AGRA Earth & Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED TYPE OF STRUCTURE INSPECTED RESTEEL REINFORCED CONCRETE ❑ STRUCTURAL STEEL FABRICATION STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION ❑ EXPANSION BOLTS U FIRE PROOFING /^ AFvcv /RORLI ❑ FOOTINGS AUGER CAST PILING O GRADE BEAMS ❑ WALLS OTHER (Specify) COLUMNS N SLAB -ON -GRADE STRUCTURAL GRADE D POST TENSIONED SLAB ■ REINFORCED MASONRY ❑ SHOTCRETE X OTHER (Spedry) CeviWtk GENERAL CONTRACTOR - IC C No. OF SAMPLES 3 No. OF SAMPLES PROJECT NAME gI e w:,I IC PROJECT No I Z— 1 1 DATE Li / C I b PERMIT NUMBER FIELD REPORT No. _ Z PAGE Z OF 3 WEATHER ,C (kip v LOCATION 11 &.✓ICQ: .Q jkCZ(At." MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. 1 GRIDS � h� CLIENT OR OWNER II ait, S. /I"LIWSI€ ENGINEER ARCHITECT GENERAL CONTRACTOR - IC C CONCRETE . MORTAR TYPE OF MORTAR / / MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. 1 GRIDS � h� SLUMP (IN.) 7 Li 7, DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES 3 No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED G)I o . I TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) 6 Z . F MORTAR TEMP. (Dog F.) TIME / 1 r AIR TEMP. 6 TIME AIR TEMP. CONCRETE ' k` SUPPLIER / P f MIX 0 t.4 3 / / MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. O U 1 GRIDS � h� SLUMP (IN.) by9 (rwPor ( -CI ,'?(V)C AIR CONTENT 7 Li 7, DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) 300 0 No. OF SAMPLES 3 No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED G)I o . I TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) 6 Z . F GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME / 1 r AIR TEMP. 6 0 Au2FEMS 19 yy RE IN.CONFORMANCE WITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT ' k` SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. 1 GRIDS � h� SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED - GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) C7) �1 E= /� ti ( is 1 / + Il LTA TIME AIR TEMP. Au2FEMS 19 yy RE IN.CONFORMANCE WITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT SPECIFIC LOCATION(S) IF NO. EXPLAIN s CI I h+U N Y LT Ind cl Ih� 1 GRIDS � h� REMARKS C7) �1 E= /� ti ( is 1 / + Il LTA sor ,Z3 /I (/N[EwcN4 (ckv(r5 Nw,NE 1 L 71 0,4 , ..0 tcc ) CONTINUED Au2FEMS 19 yy RE IN.CONFORMANCE WITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT Ig(YES NO IF NO. EXPLAIN � AGRA Earth & Environmental Inspector AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) Date in LtwvJ 0,111s vsis- &Pio mob qxi -LiGz6 MATERIAL FIELD REPORT FIELD DATA SUPPLIER CF' W' I MIX No. (-k 3 I i I PLANT No. 3 ❑ JOB MIX r R CONCRETE p_71 GROUT [ MORTAR L ! FLEX BEAMS PRISMS GROUTED ;� DESIGN TEMP. (Deg. F) YIELD /UNIT CEM LBS. _ '6 2 C Y __.... TRUCK TRUCK No. ] TICKET No. ! % AIR SLUM AIR WEIGHT I TIME I TI : 7, 1 7552 o', 7,9 / 'y V / C - ONC CJZ ILO LAB ADMIXTURES 'I IYA i AIR ENT i OZ/CWT a 6taz 1 i DESIGN STRENGTH - z e7 LJ PSI @ .Z g DAYS I _ j UNGROUTED L _I OTHER SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS L _ _ TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED_ C>� I I YDS? LOAD SIZE I I ' YDS _ AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS z 0 0 1, PROJECT NAME /+ I I I Jett Wen IK PROJECT No. TEST REPORT No I z - ( 3 1 I I 09 II II (/ /� V zvia ;alit-to, 2,v-e Le,,,e ;� DESIGN DAT� / � L'L' IPAGE .� OF J 7 PERMIT NUMBER i WEATHER n r (F`< V-. CEM LBS. _ '6 2 C Y __.... CLIENT OR OWNER 1� I � L'eNln & [-fNw >Ir?' ENGINEE ^f 1 \JLv... . - T hY t' I ARCHIT ECT GENERAL CONTRACTOR KC REPORTED BATCH DATA CEMENT TYPE 7 7 ACTUAL ;� DESIGN MIX No. ` I 3I I CEM LBS. _ '6 2 C Y __.... F ASH LBS. C AGG LBS.: C AGG LBS; C AGG LBS. WEIGHT (LBS) SAND LBS. STRENGTH (PSI) H2O LBS LAB ADMIXTURES 'I IYA 35 � AIR ENT i OZ/CWT a 6taz 7 hilt WATER ADDED g BT LBS. AT LBS. TECH l fl LABORATORY DATA DATE SPECIMANS CAST Lil /4 h DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED LAB ID No. TEST DATE FIELD CURE AGE (DAYS) SIZE (IN) AREA (SO IN) WEIGHT (LBS) MAX LOAD (IBS) STRENGTH (PSI) SET No. LAB TEST METHOD 35 � �) c u 7 hilt . 7f5 6 o t 2Q7k TECH l fl 0ASTMC39 III AASHTO T22 OTHER (Specify) .514 14 / 5 �) 1eL- o ll" /i0 COMPRESSIVE FLEXURAL CONFORMING II, NONCONFORMING REMARKS / JG [[�� // / / gF‘/ Jjtr, -//- 94 // /9 O'AG RA I Earth & Environmental PLACEMENT AREA Li FOOTINGS C_I WALLS COLUMNS D GRADE BEAMS SLAB/DECK SLAB D PILINGS 0 OTHER INSPECTOR Reviewed by GRIDS REMARKS V V✓ AGRA Earth & Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 11/94) REVIEWED BY Date_ ( 1 1 /1 MATERIAL TEST REPORT REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. Z9 ALL ITEMS INSPECTED ARE: la CONFORMING D NON - CONFORMING FIELD DATA SUPPLIER CP ke , f MIX No. 4 3 1 ) PLANT No. 3 ❑ JOB MIX R CONCRETE . GROUT ❑ MORTAR ❑ FLEX BEAMS ❑ PRISMS ❑ GROUTED ❑ UNGROUTED ❑ OTHER . TEMP. (Dag. F) YIELD/UNIT TIME TRUCK No. TICKET No. % AIR SLUMP CONC AIR WEIGHT (O L5 94 9 7)520 7,4 b /y 6 a 60 oR47a 5 9O 913 0 H2O LBS. ❑ ASTMC39 ❑ AASHTO T22 ❑ OTHER (Sped, y) ADMIXTURES 4&A AIR ENT OZ/CWT 61 WATER ADDED 8 BT LBS. AT LBS. DESIGN STRENGTH ' TOO 0 PSI ® Z g DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS G TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED 99, ( YDS 3 AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS / Q 0 / LOAD SIZE I I YDS PROJECT NAME (1tvevwalKC PROJECT No. 12 -)311 TEST REPORT No. 09 LOCATION d alnq .. avl(A sollto•� Ri v L DATE LIIY•�yb PAGE 3 OF 3 . PERMIT NUMBER WEATHER flea v CLIENT OR OWNER 0e6"11 R I ENGINES . V C - .. , -1 , Lrok:Ad C. GENERAL CONTRACTOR KC ARCHITECT REPORTED BATCH DATA CEMENT TYPE yr DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED . DESIGN ❑ ACTUAL MIX No Li 31 % AGE (DAYS) CEM LBS. G Z Cy WEIGHT (LBS) F ASH LBS. STRENGTH ( PSI) SET No. C AGG LBS. TEST METHOD �+ N J S` C AGG LBS. Z C AGG LBS. SAND LBS. oR47a 5 9O 913 0 H2O LBS. ❑ ASTMC39 ❑ AASHTO T22 ❑ OTHER (Sped, y) ADMIXTURES 4&A AIR ENT OZ/CWT 61 WATER ADDED 8 BT LBS. AT LBS. tt; LABORATORY DATA DATE SPECIMANS CAST LI /y /q b DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED LAB ID No. TEST FIELD CURE AGE (DAYS) SIZE AREA (SO IN) WEIGHT (LBS) MAX LOAD (LB S) STRENGTH ( PSI) SET No. LAB TECH TEST METHOD �+ N J S` Lau Lau Z / ,/ (IN) p •/,(Z 7n-6 0 � ,na ^ V � 0J I. I h ` SS oR47a 5 9O 913 0 (J J DL D L ❑ ASTMC39 ❑ AASHTO T22 ❑ OTHER (Sped, y) . 71✓ a (1 ,.l c t� ❑ COMPRESSIVE ❑ FLEXURAL ❑ CONFORMING ❑ NON-CONFORMING - /*� REMARKS (� C� / r �/ / ,P,. / Arr. k -�7- 14 /1 /9 / 2 dT.y 7 ��l L 7 t 5t AG RA %Earth & Environmental PLACEMENT AREA ❑ FOOTINGS ❑ WALLS ❑ COLUMNS ❑ GRADE BEAMS ��� ❑iii SLAB/DECK SLAB _`❑ PILINGS ❑ OTHER GRIDS INSPECTOR _ad ; ; / z / Reviewed by AGRA Earth & Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 11/94) REMARKS REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. Z9 REVIEWED BY Date Je MATERIAL TEST REPORT ALL ITEMS INSPECTED ARE: CONFORMING ❑ NON - CONFORMING COMMENTS Describe work completed during the day; any problems and their solutions) 4vv,ve 0n -5t4re 4 iL,spec C(MLI f+eS +COICV tC / I C .(C C k -oy corr'CC. -i vcac�we� be-h -yee,, _ p a t. ct A ve 5AILNot, (Nee LLtIe1 4 1:"C N of I0/1 c of cot. ci- .e.4-c we.s a l<.recA. _ tv)i �-p PI e.1 Lnv Ili ills qL 4 p r v;C_NO:.. - 0'f /n1LtrL4 Pctt -Ir "c � nyv. I . Til ey weve. t.J (. .. 0 ( CIL0 L t vocte✓t.. l,'+ o f cAv +h,.,,c Y_ ,i " rLe t,zl& r.LL,cLA E Corner cc/vb ciL,cL-(•L,Q v t. to ictre . cus+ 3 c 71 e u r s ;cle wcti Ic b U,'w p coy aL,cl e e c t Co:4 J .-tS ikt jeskd khe 1 +vvek (II c. 0 44) GSA Ma4-cv,c.I Fteld irpcv - pves et, 4— tl,e vesv/fs .tes-fi,.. , &1 /x `f31 Wa. ob, . +1 dye 4-o 0v- cvplQ,(ev..e,,+ o? -F4-, v./00 [e e lee 0t was aloL, + - I.c / of ti , wAJ less 4-1,,,... 6 IL, LILT Cohere* e. 0+ Cohere* w cl. Covrre, Ile are vox , c f+ (oki by 1 — bast Ite,sf s;cle c-F fke 1401-14 pLc,�k✓ — -6" -4-Vice. c o:,e:..+c . ) based at., oww v[sval pj,jeyw4-whs oL,cl 4-e 4- - j r I Le. LOL,[ve'4-e. plo eo -e,-.+ 9ewevc.117 Cola {vas 4-v pje 64- spec; f!(.n + UL,s, wi +L.+L e. 01io :0 kd t z. eyr,154 - 1 7 --1 , J AGRA E&E Field Representative Lt '�'Lf a AGRA E &E Project Manager "° a -- Contractors Representative Date LI y / 6 Continued • t. �, A G R A Earth & Environmental PROJECT NAME p I %%e yin it LOCA rION CLIENT OR OWNER Det vi 2 1-10,./:. le y GENERAL CONTRACTOR Cc; SUBCONTRACTOR Co v- .eVUVt AGRA E&E FIELD REPRESENTATIVE h 0 .vt t $ WEATHER Bay Ice/ 2- IIAC1/ kl AGRA Earth a, Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) ARRIVAL TIME DAY OF WEEK P . 00 S S M T W F CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. L TN(okik. CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No Dec; SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE /PHONE No. r� (G, we r - o r.. AGRA ESE PROJECT MANAGER EQUIPMENT USED DAILY FIELD REPORT PROJECT No. I FIELD REPORT No 12 -1311 2. DATE PAGE i l ct b OP SPECIFIC LOCATION(S) TYPE OF STRUCTURE INSPECTED GRIDS s Lt I WL• h RIVCr c9 NLI /K N C . % FOOTINGS AUGER CAST PILING GRADE BEAMS WALLS U OTHER (Specify) LOCATION &C< ✓ICC: ■ STRUCTURAL STEEL FABRICATION . COLUMNS ■ STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION IN SLAB-ON-GRADE STRUCTURAL GRADE U POST TENSIONED SLAB U EXPANSION BOLTS U FIRE PROOFING O�`N (- 4 / RCRCI MARKS ti S IC 7It+ # A VA 1 CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) sect z No. OF SAMPLES (✓otityc C,fry V> A/W, NE S C C E) AIR TEMP. TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED CONTINUED U TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED TYPE OF STRUCTURE INSPECTED RESTEEL REINFORCED CONCRETE REINFORCED MASONRY U SHOTCRETE [(OTHER (Specify) CV N PROJECT No 1 Z- i 3 I/ DATE I / I e l b E� PERMIT NUMBER FOOTINGS AUGER CAST PILING GRADE BEAMS WALLS U OTHER (Specify) LOCATION &C< ✓ICC: ■ STRUCTURAL STEEL FABRICATION . COLUMNS ■ STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION IN SLAB-ON-GRADE STRUCTURAL GRADE U POST TENSIONED SLAB U EXPANSION BOLTS U FIRE PROOFING O�`N (- 4 / RCRCI TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) MORTAR TEMP. (Deg F.) ?ROJECT NAME F E vI)lc II INC`IN•° PROJECT No 1 Z- i 3 I/ DATE I / I e l b E� PERMIT NUMBER FIELD REPORT No. _ C Z1 PAGE .r- OF 3 WEATHER 60 Cl<ol LOCATION &C< ✓ICC: SLUMP (IN.) CLIENT OR OWNER Dea1.0 pp 6/ b IN SIey ENGINEER ARCHITECT TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED GENERAL CONTRACTOR I AG RA Earth & Environmental YES NO Inspector ALL ITEMS ABOVE WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT AP,PROVEO PLANS IF NO, EXPLAIN AGM Earth I Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 1154) • Date y y Ct b LUVV/ (/}HS Q -68`i ,, 981 -4 26 MATERIAL FIELD REPORT MORTARt TYPE OF MORTAR SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) (wool- ( -a4 ,; (4)G AIR CONTENT 7 t.I 7 DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) SLUMP (IN.) No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) MORTAR TEMP. (Deg F.) No. OF SAMPLES TIME AIR TEMP. I AG RA Earth & Environmental YES NO Inspector ALL ITEMS ABOVE WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT AP,PROVEO PLANS IF NO, EXPLAIN AGM Earth I Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 1154) • Date y y Ct b LUVV/ (/}HS Q -68`i ,, 981 -4 26 MATERIAL FIELD REPORT GROUT ... ` . SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. (wool- ( -a4 ,; (4)G AIR CONTENT 7 t.I 7 DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) 300 0 SLUMP (IN.) TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) 61 . g No. OF SAMPLES AIR TEMP. a 0 TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) • TIME NR TEMP. I AG RA Earth & Environmental YES NO Inspector ALL ITEMS ABOVE WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT AP,PROVEO PLANS IF NO, EXPLAIN AGM Earth I Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 1154) • Date y y Ct b LUVV/ (/}HS Q -68`i ,, 981 -4 26 MATERIAL FIELD REPORT CONCRETE ;•''. - — SUPPLIER / f I MIX p 43 I/ MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) b y t e (wool- ( -a4 ,; (4)G AIR CONTENT 7 t.I 7 DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) 300 0 No OF SAMPLES 3 TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED CI 0 , I CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) 61 . g TIME i f ., / ) AIR TEMP. a 0 I AG RA Earth & Environmental YES NO Inspector ALL ITEMS ABOVE WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT AP,PROVEO PLANS IF NO, EXPLAIN AGM Earth I Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 1154) • Date y y Ct b LUVV/ (/}HS Q -68`i ,, 981 -4 26 MATERIAL FIELD REPORT s< LABORATORY DATA DATE SPECIMANS CAST Lib /q6 DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED LAB ID No. TEST DATE FIELD CURE AGE (DAYS) SIZE (IN) AREA (SO IN) WEIGHT (LBS) MAX LOAD (LBS) STRENGTH (PSI) SET No. LAB TECH 3s/ WEIGHT 10 i >" 70 EtI 7,4 b /y 7f 5 b 047b (t`4 C J DESIGN STRENGTH Sot 0 PSI @ Zt; DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS C 7 TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED C79 ) YDS AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS / C V / LOAD SIZE I I YDS REMARKS 7 E A./ Ayr, /e 7-M- 94 4 /9 / FIELD DATA SUPPLIER c . p W' I MIX No. L 3 II I PLANT No. 3 ❑ JOB MIX : CONCRETE l l GROUT El MORTAR CI FLEX BEAMS L I PRISMS I GROUTED [1 I UNGROUTED Ci OTHER TEMP. (Dog. F) YIELD/UNIT TIME TRUCK No. TICKET No. %AIR SLUMP CONC AIR WEIGHT 10 i >" 70 753ZO 7,4 b /y I ba 60 DESIGN STRENGTH Sot 0 PSI @ Zt; DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS C 7 TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED C79 ) YDS AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS / C V / LOAD SIZE I I YDS �AG RA Earth & Environmental ' ROJECT NAME q ICI Jet VVOI I IC LOCATION IvtC VI cX 61 VI a SC dL..Jn R ;v - v Lc, CLIENT OR OWNER LJ eLl V1 b FT 4(WSI.i �. GENERAL CONTRACTOR L I FOOTINGS Li WALLS COLUMNS ❑ GRADE BEAMS • SLAB /DECK kl SLAB PILINGS 0 OTHER INSPECTOR K G GRIDS REMARKS Reviewed by `/ 5 : 6 da AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) REVIEWED BY ENGINEER - ev LO ARCHITECT PLACEMENT AREA REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. Z Date g MATERIAL TEST REPORT PROJECT No. TEST REPORT No i - 13 11 DATE PAGE 4 /v /ec 3 OF 3 PERMIT NUMBER WEATHER O CI F ✓ 01 ! REPORTED BATCH DATA CEMENT TYPE ❑ DESIGN ❑ ACTUAL M IX No. `13/1 CEM LBS. G 2 0 L ASH LBS. C AGG LBS C AGG LBS C AGG LBS SAND LBS. H2O LBS ADMIXTURES ' I (.7A AIR ENT I OZ/CWT I 6Y WATER ADDED BT I LBS -I AT LBS. ALL ITEMS INSPECTED ARE: II CONFORMING LI NON- CONFORMING TEST METHOD ASTM C 39 AASHTO T22 OTHER (Specify) COMPRESSIVE n FLEXURAL I] CONFORMING ❑ NON - CONFORMING FIELD DATA SUPPLIER c n ) , Y , MIX No. L. 3 I 1 I PLANT No. 3 ❑ JOB MIX fr R CONCRETE GROUT ❑MORTAR ❑ FLEX BEAMS ❑ PRISMS ❑GROUTED ❑ UNGROUTED OTHER ❑ ACTUAL TEMP. (Deg. F) YIELD/UNIT TIME TRUCK No. TICKET No. %AIR SLUMP CONC AIR WEIGHT 1 94 ` I 7>3Z - 0 7,4 b iy 62 60 ‘ �/ Z SAND LBS. / (LBS) 76- D Lod � & T 0 ` � _ c Y, J H2O LBS. C A DL ❑ ASTMC39 ❑ AASHTO T22 ❑ OTHER (SpeciIY) ADMIXTURES A" iT A AIR ENT OZ/CWT DESIGN STRENGTH 3000 PSI 0 Z3 DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS G 7 TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED 3/9 I YDS LOAD SIZE I I YDS AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS / // REPORTED BATCH DATA CEMENT TYPE ❑ DESIGN ❑ ACTUAL MIX No. `13/ PERMIT NUMBER CEM LOS. G 2 E. It ENGINEER v c..,..3-cr o ■cAo L F ASH LBS. -% GENERAL CONTRACTOR KL C AGG LBS. LAB TECH TEST METHOD C AGG LBS. / „{ ( I . c � t . `t C AGG LBS. ‘ �/ Z SAND LBS. / (LBS) 76- D Lod � & T 0 ` � _ c Y, J H2O LBS. C A DL ❑ ASTMC39 ❑ AASHTO T22 ❑ OTHER (SpeciIY) ADMIXTURES A" iT A AIR ENT OZ/CWT 63 o L WATER ADDED BT LBS. AT LBS. PROJECT NAME n N PROJECT No. 12 -1 311 TEST REPORT No. 0 PAGE 3 OF 3 LOCATION / � Ivultav, avid >othat°vh (444- Love DATE 4 / V1 6 16 TEST DATE PERMIT NUMBER WEATHER GIPS' ✓ CLIENT OR OWNER Deat� R I�awstey ENGINEER v c..,..3-cr o ■cAo L WEIGHT (LBS) -% GENERAL CONTRACTOR KL ARCHITECT • - LABORATORY DATA .sa DATE SPECIMANS CAST L/I v l y 6 DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED LAB 10 No. TEST DATE FIELD CURE AGE (DAYS) SIZE (IN) AREA (SO IN) WEIGHT (LBS) MAX LOAD STRENGTH ( SET No. LAB TECH TEST METHOD 3T / / „{ ( I . c � t . `t _�] 43 at ‘ �/ Z / (LBS) 76- D Lod � & T 0 ` � _ c Y, J C A DL ❑ ASTMC39 ❑ AASHTO T22 ❑ OTHER (SpeciIY) . d- (t ti [ 5, L L t T J 0 D L ❑ COMPRESSIVE ❑ FLEXURAL ❑ CONFORMING ❑ NONCONFORMING REMARKS / (� / *J GA�/ �I J, 7 AA,, , k 7 -�/ 94 1 /9 / O LXwy ,S1*--- 7 AGRA Earth & Environmental PLACEMENT AREA ❑ FOOTINGS ❑ WALLS ❑ COLUMNS ❑ GRADE BEAMS rrr SLAB /DECK " lyl SLAB ❑ PILINGS ❑ OTHER INSPECTOR Reviewed by GRIDS REMARKS REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. 2,C7 AGRA Earth 8 ErMronmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) N � / REVIEWED BY a Date g 5 MATERIAL TEST REPORT ALL ITEMS INSPECTED ARE: X CONFORMING ❑ NON - CONFORMING 04/05/1996 13:14 15094820202 AGRA Earth & environmental DAILY FIELD REPORT PROJECT NAME cj/6100+IC BOWS, I1R,ItaIA LOCATION CLIENT OR OWNER neG ✓ .Q lea «rS Jp GENERAL CONTRACTOR Kc SUBCONTRACTOR Ca ;me vo AGRA E&E FIELD REPI ESENTATIVE W EATHER / p •F pl COMMENTS (D✓.JE e* =avoided dump the airy. Any mein utl thou' •uhut ne) Rrv N- S 4t.G lkpec4 a'i tsts'ejn{c fIacad -cob o ca„He�h veadwa be-be-Lyre., wre t p sunt 3 i► (.c4MC A..b± -t ae 40 C. of was was pIo tot Me+. v_h1!1ls. aHL PYVCC N0 -4,94 R{ Jnlq� PeticCc Fhyr. the „ :.e r ! e y were col, ccv.F ab°Lr; v.elert,v +se eav+L1...vort y�drrttjt co-A N. U r_oer. ( N N A +LC. F S'at walk by WwA .P-or 9ns a«d tlec.+ cow l�v; t Wi. ks.ed 44L +ire t of 44) a •A (u s+ 3 c�T fi.,lers. The allaacl..eei (v1a�Cv FirM rn rese nts th res✓ff{t o{ «th±- , . 4311. We observe git Aru o4 tosice - de wieict, wag less ac,“ 6 iN . +11`;ct Ave 4v o ... i (Q rrle s ite a , g rr4- toc.- 6y 1 -4. wee Ati_wa5 q /v'-. +1.c Cots+ r;& of 4-4v true ple.,ire- (3astc/ o , ovv visvai ebtevvotho ..s ai..d 4-e 4-i•- , fl.e cot- p)o'cm.ems f jpteer ll CAN.. !k•.. tt ei aloe re ....40( entety -s AGRA E&E Fisk Representative Contractors RepeMRtadve AGRA Earls F Enwon.eel. IK. (Rye TAM) AGRA E &E,SPOKANE, WA PAGE 01 CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No VQvr. 74ca YJB•+ CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE r PHONE Na. Dew in .. ...._ _...._.. SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE i PHONE No No. I h4 rb ti AO ESE PROJECT MANAGER EQUIPMENT USED Cats Y/ y l 6 PROJECT No 1.1 DATE DATE ntiq ARRIVAL TIME 11.00 6 col. r.-4 . , .. AGRA E&E Project Manager-. FIELD REPORT NO Z9 PAGE DAY OF WEEK S S M T W&F Continued F] TYPE OF IN&ECTION PERFORMED TYPE OF STRUCTURE INSPECTED E] RESTEEL 0 STRUCTURAL STEEL PAM/CATION 0 REINFORCED CONCRETE 0 STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION 0 REINFORCED MASONRY O EXPANSIONBOLTS ❑ SNOTCRETE 0 FIRE MOPING [OTHER (Soak) CO VI (Pt4C ,¢Oats / /t0H) 0 FOOTINGS LOCATION ROI -� • COLUMNS • AUGER CAST PILING tg � --I SIAS -ON GRADE I STRUCTURAL GRADE POST TENSIONED SLAB ❑ GRADE BEAMS 0 WALLS u OTHER (Specy) PROJECT NAME p I RL!N V 1,C PROJECT I IN I I FIELD REPORT No. 2 LOCATION ROI -� 1 • 4. h D • I /9 I b PAGE ` _ z OF 1< No OF SAMPLES J PERMIT NUMBER WEATHER 60 ((fa r CLIENT OR OWTER paw io Now city ENGINEER GENERAL CONTF T(n ARCHITECT _— • - 04/05/1996 13:14 15094820202 AG R IA Earth & En ronmental GRIDS S a I..e., RT;Fn- 04 I a tm' In REMARTh ti <K'At_ +/{tA ;or. Z 3 1/4 dt✓LNi fs h,y✓S Mw, Me sC AGM EMT A ALL RES A suao.a OGP IF NO, EARN IN OOMPORMAICE WTI APPROVED Plan SPECIFIC LOCATION(S) AGRA E &E,SPOKANE, WA PAGE 02 SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPORT No SLUMP UN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) NO OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME TYPE OF MORTAR MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP UN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED MORTAR TEMP. tog F.) TIME Date L{(4 frik) LMVV/ Loops wff! -68`s Kiel 481 -4(,2 MATERIAL FIELD REPORT GROUT MORTAR AIR TEMP AIR TEMP CONTINUED U SUPPLIER (.i' hot • 4 3 I ON MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN .) v /_ i (won 4, .01 ,'<(0C AIR CONTENT 7 Li 7. DESIGN STRENGTH (PEI 309 0 No OF SAMPLES J TOTAL CU YARDS PU¢D CID, I CONCRETE TEMP (Dog a) 61 • F TIME /Q ; Z 1 ' AmTEMV. 6 Q • - 04/05/1996 13:14 15094820202 AG R IA Earth & En ronmental GRIDS S a I..e., RT;Fn- 04 I a tm' In REMARTh ti <K'At_ +/{tA ;or. Z 3 1/4 dt✓LNi fs h,y✓S Mw, Me sC AGM EMT A ALL RES A suao.a OGP IF NO, EARN IN OOMPORMAICE WTI APPROVED Plan SPECIFIC LOCATION(S) AGRA E &E,SPOKANE, WA PAGE 02 SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPORT No SLUMP UN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) NO OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME TYPE OF MORTAR MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP UN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED MORTAR TEMP. tog F.) TIME Date L{(4 frik) LMVV/ Loops wff! -68`s Kiel 481 -4(,2 MATERIAL FIELD REPORT GROUT MORTAR AIR TEMP AIR TEMP CONTINUED U . 04/05/1996 13: 14 15094820202 Page 6-11 AGRA E &E,SPOKANE, WA CONCRETE STRUCTURES 6-02 invoice con of the concrete that is supplied from the point of the infraction until the deficient condition is carectcd. 3. For the third violation, the concrete supplier is suspended from providing concrete until all such deficiencies causing the violation have been permanently corrected and the plant and equipment have been reinspected and meets all the prcqualification requirements. 4. For the fourth violation, the concrete supplies shall be disqualified from supplying concrete for one year from the date of disqualification. At the end of the suspension period the concrete supplier may request that the facilities be inspected for prequalification. 4423(4)B Hand Mixing The Contractor shall not hand -mix concrete except in emergencies and then only with written permission from the Engineer. Hand mixing is never permitted for concrete w be placed in water. If the Engineer permits, hand mixing shall be done on a watertight platform in a way that distributes materials evenly throughout the mass. Mixing shall continue long enough to produce a tmifonn mixture. No hand -mixed batch shall exceed 1f2 cubic yard. 642.3(4)C Coasktency The maximum slump for vibrated concrete shall be: 1. Three inches for concrete placed in all footings, box girder bottom slabs, bridge approach slabs. and roadway deck slabs (including the superstructure of flat slab bridges). 2. Pow inches for all other canasta. The maximum slump for nonvibrated concrete shall be 7 inches. The maximum slump for Class 4000W concrete. for underwater placement, shall be 9 inches. Based on the Contactors written request and as approved by the Engineer, the max6num shunp may be reduced. If the Contractor is unable to provide a concrete with a workable consistency, a water reducing admixture in State- provided mixes may be used provided the batch meets the slump limit and complies with the proportions required in Section 6-02.3(2)C. When ahigh -range water reducer is used, the maximum slump for vibrated concrete may be increased 2 inches while the concrete is affected by the admixture. I1023(4)D Ratampering Any concrete which has readied initial set shall not be used. rammed, or remixed. 4423(5) Aaeplacs of Concrete The concrete Froths= shall provide a Certificate of Compliance for each truckload of oonaete. The Certificate of Complies= shall include: Nominalism Plant Watching Facility) WSDOT Contract No. Nampo( WSDOT Contractor (prime Contractor) Date lime Battled Track No. Initial Revolution Counter Reading PAGE 03 COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day: any problems and (heir solutions A 1 P /i +'L`ii 4- L. 4' G�',t r� t ��a - n C) � a 4 (LI ) S_ie :A l� c ✓YLl S r< 1G LL1 v,-,1 y1 1 �/ 1, C / a / � � te j I I -.- A rt,.l�. v\ ck. Y .- y \/ f� r- r'VN p -}- WI I e_ v ✓N - C4 � S c .ti � • �C 1)r/-. 1 1 0 / t.UCAS S nINh a? -e tiT ( awaS 4n LD C'__ltR / k L Co ,4,G�r/r cpA-LL...w., k 4 1 r,`C; \ \D 4k G ,k•ly, L 'e cif e 0 C 3 Pre s we0 \C \ V • . c i r - 01 l•>° 4 0 o - " ) r J a S _L- ...,. L .1 w.. I 1 I. � - 'i - � • _ . 1 • r ......... ' . Q r'eR S / e3/4•••-at S _. Si 6 . • •oG n wi - D1 CC7 2, 5 --L.� Ckt. n �.� "^ll...a- L te,.n. �^rti- ( it v . , , - ci -0 b St . . ;, 4 _S - ____) 1-8 2- I I G ie -P � ca to e•-• T ✓7001 "LJ • LL ._SL 9 (] t.4 n t Cl- J- /.� »1.11 .pa AGRA E &E Field Representative Contractors Representative R e v�+ l r AGRA E &E Project Manager - Date Continued ❑ Its *AGRA Earth & Environmental ■ • PROJECT NAME wa V_, R 4 3 i- LOCATION i1 /' l CLIENT OR OWNE {.� ea i1 �a.w5 GENERAL CONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR AGRA ESE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE WEATHER C \.d L .A)L •• CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No r r 4 s •-� CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE I PHONE No AGRA ESE PROJECT MANAGER //�. 1..�cz !:' IG EQUIPMENT USED PROJECT No. FIELD REPORT No Q -i3;/ Sc DATE PAGE y -l7 -i 6 ARRIVAL TIME 7:' y Stx•n OF q 7 DAY OF WEEK S S M T C()T F AGRA Earth & Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 7)94) DAILY FIELD REPORT PROJECT NAME n [t 1{ 11 1I % PROJECT FIELD REPORT No. K_t_.�. K. t' 7, ` r Try s_ ! / 3 il ? ._ �_ ._ . 1 ✓ \/Y,7 /1 .�G f ' I 1. . . C7i(L'LLVr'lI _ciG DATE PAGE L /'/ - 2-'5G =\ OF '\ SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS VARIATION FIELD FROM DISTANCE DRY FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS -TEST ELEV. BELOW MAIL DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. METHOD LOCATION (FEET) GRADE TYPE (PCF) ( %) (%) ( %) FAIL `7(t Inr‘L•\ Z\vtr ` I[lh ^ t: l_. 4_ '\2 k.) tit Ccr e,.. A$c'13i. Z I 15 :Ot i P L /.... 'S:l \.-..1... w .. (4 \tom e . - "Lc- S,..� La, r✓.Y . - _ S�Att -: ! \In:, kc -c.; a tht 10 e Co. ,. ( 333 135,013.1 Y, 4 7C €5. 2.1 r ^� 97,31 ^C.8 P S..n V RY%+c— La..r ; E✓ + 5 b C o-- n t r _ l / 1.3` �. I t l� (/'‘'. /:� . ..1 I , 41, A 4 'c.n 1S kU( G ,- n -c*-�- PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON: SPECIFICATION: t ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 ❑ 90 %13 698 ❑ 95% 13698 `.MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 ❑ 90% D 1557 ❑ 90% D 1557 ❑ OTHER ❑ OTHER TEST NUMBER MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. ( %) /� / R I ,,^(� _ ` g-� (//_�\��,� /' 13/4 Riga C..G -L,-S r ''7 1 3 8. / 6 ,. 7 = DENSITY TEST RT= RETEST TEST METHOD �Illl NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) AGRA E &E Field Rep. (Initials) AGRA E&E Project Manager (Initials) • Contractoes Rep. (Initials) Continued ❑ . AGRA Earth & Environmental DAILY FIELD REPORT AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) INSPECTORS . DAILY REPORT INSPECTOR: PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: WEATHER VISITORS: SUPERINTENDENT: OPERATORS: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: TIME: ern--e j /Z// //t Ci17r/70Y/m7 <nmeHn le WORK PERIOD: A.M. A.M. � 0.2 P.M.: / or %«r" MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT LABORERS: C- reeH r -/c r(2 SURVEYORS: TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: A.M. REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER PAGE OF /4 ' ,✓ v ir J CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: PROJECT NO.: 9r� /q FLAGMEN: ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS P.M. d .Tit4mnn 4 4.--9.t Zone, P.M. / „n ( ww,e12^/7 FOREMAN: /n27 /nr7 ,'f ii'nrt -j /m ,om E'vrr Lent `i/i✓a. Z1d,,4n r 4 =M.ch: v / /.' M-, C WORK: O i o i !i . Wel — e nr 4 2a4a-: ©L [iC 4% 6 l � ?- /% �� �vw / / / / 7 P�9 / f / ir'✓ /s 7 i7 � ( j >v, Y./te y/ r' e r»r / (N-O, /-4 rt.. ! ' / 'vivFG✓ .6i e4 4 , r,,q r. e,,,ri/ 74v-A/ -7 i / s 77.rnl/lfec✓ %r ,%r, n*'/" 9/7.-7 r no/ 40" i ' e at . ✓r 1 — teSter continued on back) TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: Elii LILTY/PROPERTY DAMAGE: DATE: 5// 5/ /9c ACCOUNT OF WORK (CONT'D) TIME: WORK: 104, ,� _,/ T. .11, 47 /7 7% 474 1{0 r,,i�GA %• an.�'/7itr /r / e.S 07 �tmlrs �44�'I� � rin M%iti /,' nor �:✓o, r Line, /P /an rind .Z" 7`0,/key:/ i.,�/ r,9oired hr' 74;!,-15#7 Da Vt. < w ave c / ect l!^iz 'ro /WOW /9'/Y P'?r , yar4 0 COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day; any problems and their solutions) LD k" P /ITC T (c N I .. P L. ! /t�rrl red r;n �t�r C . 1 Ir; f'. k j jes +- Co+, -.po ttoL, of slew: sv� vcAtI et r .wl�,c �. 1 pp /� lase hot L � e e _ k. J Yy_CO{.-t tc f c r-,,,, , re t we oLosev✓e fLz_den Si Tt(rr -Fto., 'I t /beast f -les+,L. 4 --:4-t ft�,e. c4es of lvkt TL.e £vv4 w�lrr(, 4e€... c 1sh -v Le / 6. H v[,.Ig de.t ✓ xtzsweUl ittl n Cok.,,( c--1-2-, oT a L.-6, lLlk... t i..... G�e:�t Sr T 0-F 13 gr7 PeC at o-l + v k e o 4 7. 6.7 7 o (set pc Z, . 1,.p A vT' . Ot.l CNe-Q, 4- 4 Leal 5ahkC Plv(v 1L (es44 (o ck-e4C p Ickce(l V c wcAItz 4,,,4 i.., LQal CLA 1.- VAL. -r, 01 4- SR Jr.....el.Pv� - Crar.d t (m er..., - Thhe (Led {er+- r-efvl-is 600.,P 3) .5 Lk. -erA +(,.c_ (ntirt,.o4c -}4- e LA..{-0J,- .s Loo-ec'/ // ?eCrf fc•Tt✓LS . 3 e ✓s wry (a S-++ go oti UUV v(fvA( o ;ervG. .t ,..,e( 7 4-5-4-1 t 'I .., G Ci ye N 0 k.rit -/-ro L,5 t(."I � iHS P P( t. (or.Q CO 4) l.- - 1 - o flk ! C f+ fret fir 4 ow lL e -. Gala. pcC +-tu. -, a t1 ( J k yc 5h f" GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA E &E Field Representative D v '� AGRA E &E Project Manager` Contractors Representative Date 41/42 Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME R i✓ ek- vv0llr- PROJECT No, /3.1 I FIELD REPORT No. I 3I LOCATION (�?? H"A VIQQ✓ Cd l • 1 II� Ana 1,.p A vT' . DATE ARRIVAL th E /y � 1 4 5 1 PAGE DAY OF I OF I / WEEK 1 S SOT W T F CLIENT OR OWNER 112±(1t^ Hmwsle CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. VPyG. GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR C vn eve k SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA ESE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE LD I e:t v,d ULL i. AGRA ESE PROJECT MANAGER u,)_. .4 "v n o lc( WEATHER b 0 °% de EQUIPMENT USED ' @AGRA Earth & Environmental DAILY FIELD REPORT AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc: (Rev. 7/94) SUMMARY OF FIELD COMPACTION TEST RESULTS - VARIATION FIELD FROM DISTANCE DRY FIELD FIELD OPTIMUM PASS TEST ELEV. BELOW MATL DENSITY MOIST. COMP. MOIST. OR TEST No. METHOD LOCATION (FEET) GRADE TYPE (PCF) ( %) ( %) ( %) FAIL PROJECT No. '.z. - - t, n Ai 4I (-I cvvla 30 o 1. S. e' w d- s-;de�lk D 6 DATE ,I- ' ? Z• S, I31.y D 9. ,) -!.7 ( 1 PERCENT COMPACTION BASED ON: SPECIFICATION: ❑ STANDARD PROCTOR ASTM D 698 ❑ 90% D 698 ❑ 95% D 698 R MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 ❑ 90% D 1557 °l %"' D 1557 ❑ OTHER ❑ OTHER TEST NUMBER MATERIAL REFERENCE MATERIAL MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM TYPE SAMPLE No. DESCRIPTION DENSITY (PCF) MOIST. (%) I I / nnn haft(. SakcLy 6-p4VEL /38.7 61 7 DT =DENSITY TEST . RETEST TEST METHOD I / N = NUCLEAR (ASTM D 2922) SC = SAND CONE (ASTM D 1556) DC = DRIVE CYLINDER (ASTM D 2937) AGRA E &E Field Rep.,(Initials) AGRA E &E Manager (Initials) Contractor's Rep. (Initials) i Continued ❑ Project — PROJECT NAME (RIvc 1 PROJECT No. '.z. - - t, n FIELD REPORT No. 31 DATE ,I- ' ? Z• 0 PAGE {q( a OF 1y1 t AG RA Earth & Environmental DAILY FIELD REPORT AGRA Earth & Envlonmental, Inc. 'May. 7194) �IV D 47k Gntz 4i TYPE OF INSPECTION PERFORMED TYPE OF STRUCTURE INSPECTED RESTEEL STRUCTURAL STEEL FABRICATION STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION FOOTINGS ❑ AUGER CAST PILING GRADE BEAMS O WALLS 5 OTHER (Speedy) COLUMNS I- / ig SLAB -ON -GRADE SI[lk' t-c )z. STRUCTURAL GRADE a POST TENSIONED SLAB . REINFORCED CONCRETE REINFORCED MASONRY SHOTCRETE OTHER (Speedy) �, 7 {R Lj-Q j-e.. IN EXPANSION BOLTS ❑ FIRE PROOFING ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR. .. / ARCHITECT PROJECT NAME R l v . ?c i t. , )IC PROJECT No. )z -)311 FIELD REPORT No. — ( PAGE 9 OF'/ WEATHER /0 ° FCI 1 v. LOCATION SUPPLIER Ar_ip DATE N/Z -t /CIL PERMIT NUMBER .-' CLIENT OR OWNER jOOIH I Jz;Iw1Ie ' ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR. .. / ARCHITECT OAG RA Earth & Environmental 'YES NO ALL ITEMS ABOVE WERE-INCONFORMANCEWM` BUILDING DEPARTMENT4 R PPROVED `PLANS IF NO, EXPLAIN Inspector OTh d - AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) MATERIAL FIELD REPORT Date y /2L /Ci /, .- CONCRETE MORTAR L o` TYPE OF MORTAR SUPPLIER Ar_ip SLUMP (IN.) .-' MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. ^ I L� I a -. G. /41,-'C MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. Sri SLUMP (IN.) / GR EMP. (Deg F.) Vu ii--,t3 , DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) 3 0 00 AIR CONTENT No. OF SAMPLES -Z DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES 3 TOTAL CU YA •: - LACED MO' • TEMP. (Deg F.) TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED q TIME AIR TEMP. CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) OAG RA Earth & Environmental 'YES NO ALL ITEMS ABOVE WERE-INCONFORMANCEWM` BUILDING DEPARTMENT4 R PPROVED `PLANS IF NO, EXPLAIN Inspector OTh d - AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) MATERIAL FIELD REPORT Date y /2L /Ci /, .- CONCRETE SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SUPPLIER Ar_ip SLUMP (IN.) GRIDS MIX. 7 90 6 ^ I L� I a -. G. /41,-'C MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. Sri TOTAL CU YA PLACED 4t/ --e2.( GR EMP. (Deg F.) Vu ii--,t3 , SLUMP (IN.) Li 17 3 0 00 AIR CONTENT ( -Z DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) No. OF SAMPLES 3 TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED q CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) sir REMARKS TIME ),p . 3 y AIR TEMP. G nn 0 OAG RA Earth & Environmental 'YES NO ALL ITEMS ABOVE WERE-INCONFORMANCEWM` BUILDING DEPARTMENT4 R PPROVED `PLANS IF NO, EXPLAIN Inspector OTh d - AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) MATERIAL FIELD REPORT Date y /2L /Ci /, .- GROUT SUPPLIER MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. !—� SLUMP (IN.) GRIDS DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) ^ I L� I a -. G. /41,-'C No. OF SAMPLES Sri TOTAL CU YA PLACED 4t/ --e2.( GR EMP. (Deg F.) Vu ii--,t3 , TIME AIR TEMP. OAG RA Earth & Environmental 'YES NO ALL ITEMS ABOVE WERE-INCONFORMANCEWM` BUILDING DEPARTMENT4 R PPROVED `PLANS IF NO, EXPLAIN Inspector OTh d - AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) MATERIAL FIELD REPORT Date y /2L /Ci /, .- SPECIFIC LOCATION(S) GRIDS I � S kt 1,1 L-4_ P. t v-e le-- i(w ( ^ I L� I a -. G. /41,-'C .S L- Sri t-{.1 4t/ --e2.( f (e., I .r Vu ii--,t3 , REMARKS 1 ti. a46 1 L i 5 J CONTINUED ❑ OAG RA Earth & Environmental 'YES NO ALL ITEMS ABOVE WERE-INCONFORMANCEWM` BUILDING DEPARTMENT4 R PPROVED `PLANS IF NO, EXPLAIN Inspector OTh d - AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) MATERIAL FIELD REPORT Date y /2L /Ci /, .- LAB ID No. TEST DATE FIELD CURE AGE (DAYS) SIZE (IN) AREA (SO IN) WEIGHT (LBS) MAX LOAD (1-135) STRENGTH (PSI) SET No. LAB TECH %AIR S /a CONC 2 Ay/1 Io :3s 5731 ' 2S'gD 3zy Y z. CL _i15 r /.z6 z$' at 5/-Zn AIR ENT OZ/CWT /5D Z., WATER ADDED q t // DESIGN STRENGTH ;OOO PSI @ a v DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED 4 YDS AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS /bo la LOAD SIZE ( YDS FIELD DATA No. 1 Z. - /3 /) SUPPLIER 1-c w r MIX No. 7 go / PLANT No. Z 0 t El JOB MIX XCONCRETE ❑ GROUT ❑MORTAR ❑ FLEX BEAMS . PRISMS ■ GROUTED ❑ UNGROUTED ❑OTHER PAGE / OF 9 TEMP. (Deg. F) YIELD/UNIT TIME TRUCK No. TICKET No. %AIR SLUMP CONC AIR WEIGHT Io :3s 5731 1 129176 b,Z Y z. SS 6 0 H2O LBS. ADMIXTURES 4 f 5 AIR ENT OZ/CWT /5D Z., WATER ADDED q t // DESIGN STRENGTH ;OOO PSI @ a v DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED 4 YDS AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS /bo la LOAD SIZE ( YDS PROJECT NAME Ri fv ra IK No. 1 Z. - /3 /) TEST REP RT No C-LS LOCATION DATE L/9 PAGE / OF 9 PERMIT NUMBER WEATHER 60 clPU CLIENT OR OWNER J Dean l(H /ey ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT REPORTED BATCH DATA CEMENT TYPE ❑ DESIGN ❑ ACTUAL MIX No. CEM LBS. F ASH LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS C AGG LBS. SAND LBS. H2O LBS. ADMIXTURES 4 f 5 AIR ENT OZ/CWT /5D Z., WATER ADDED q t // 87 LBS. AT LBS. ,AGRA Earth & Environmental PLACEMENT AREA ❑ FOOTINGS ❑ WALLS ❑ COLUMNS ❑ GRADE BEAMS ❑ SLAB/DECK SLAB ❑ PILINGS ❑ OTHER INSPECTOR DATE SPECIMANS CAST REMARKS Reviewed by AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) GRIDS v. h BI' A S Lt A Ke. n l ve ✓ S G 0 6-- fi- REMARKS REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. 3 0044 .l,_ i do y y /z9(ab 11,55 REVIEWED BY LABORATORY DATA DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED Date ‘11)1 MATERIAL TEST REPORT ALL ITEMS INSPECTED ARE: CONFORMING ❑ NON - CONFORMING TEST METHOD ❑ ASTM C 39 ❑ AASHTO T22 ❑ OTHER (Specify) ❑ COMPRESSIVE ❑ FLEXURAL ❑ CONFORMING ❑ NON - CONFORMING • ,, LABORATORY DATA DATE SPECIMANS CAST DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED LAB ID No. TEST DATE FIELD CURE AGE (DAYS) SIZE (IN) AREA (SO IN) WEIGHT (LOS) MAX LOAD (LBS) STRENGTH (PSI) SET No. LAB TECH .5gy y /a9 _2_9 /76 2 zr Ay /1 gg 6 yzs'gD titL -I cos 12 07 or" 3z90 Lioso I-17 7o I> 4— fl r_ DL C AGG LBS. rlo 5- /Zn SAND LBS. 28 DESIGN STRENGTH T000 PSI ® Z2 DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS / ,,/ TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED / YDS3 AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS 00 7, LOAD SIZE Li YDS 5 AIR ENT OZ/CWT I /5 z, WATER ADDED y ya BT LBS. AT LBS. REMARKS 1 clP `( l i9 j a6 tl'/5S � ?r d j- zo / %6 1.Ilo FIELD DATA SUPPLIER , I to l / Q MIX No. 7 9 0 PLANT No. Z 0 ❑ JOB MIX XCONCRETE ❑ GROUT ❑MORTAR ❑ FLEX BEAMS ❑ PRISMS ❑ GROUTED ❑ UNGROUTED • OTHER ❑ DESIGN TEMP. (Deg. F) YIELD/UNIT TIME TRUCK No. TICKET No. %AIR SLUMP CONC AIR WEIGHT / 0 ' 573Z _2_9 /76 6/Z ( 7 / /Z gg 6 C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. SAND LBS. DESIGN STRENGTH T000 PSI ® Z2 DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS / ,,/ TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED / YDS3 AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS 00 7, LOAD SIZE Li YDS REPORTED BATCH DATA CEMENT TYPE TEST REP RT No. s ❑ DESIGN ❑ ACTUAL MIX No. PERMIT NUMBER WEATHER 60 nF c /e4 '- CEM LBS. ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT F ASH LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. SAND LBS. H2O LBS. ADMIXTURES I 5 AIR ENT OZ/CWT I /5 z, WATER ADDED y ya BT LBS. AT LBS. PROJECT NAME R nfv,to 1K PRO PROJECT No. Ii - /3ri TEST REP RT No. s LOCATION DATE / 2 L ig PAGE 4 1 OF 9 PERMIT NUMBER WEATHER 60 nF c /e4 '- CLIENT OR OWNER Dear) HA /Py ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT 0 A G R A Earth & Environmental PLACEMENT AREA ❑ FOOTINGS ❑ WALLS ❑ COLUMNS ❑ GRADE BEAMS ❑ SLAB/DECK SLAB ❑ PILINGS ❑ OTHER GRIDS 1 t h F. t, 41'-4 SHA ICC. Rude,- St I v (r REMARKS REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. 3 INSPECTOR Ak " 'N eWt.. -. Reviewed by zza AGRA Earth & Emirv. nental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) Date 4 5 60 MATERIAL TEST REPORT ALL ITEMS INSPECTED ARE: CONFORMING ❑ NON - CONFORMING TEST METHOD ❑ ASTM C 39 ❑ AASHTO T22 ❑ OTHER (Specify) ❑ COMPRESSIVE ❑ FLEXURAL ❑ CONFORMING ❑ NON - CONFORMING INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT INSPECTOR: F 5 . c,S - c . n.e2'. PROJECT NO:: PROJECT:���cy CONTRACTOR: VL,�.N,,,ts; 2uc-Tto,.i. WORK PERIOD: ° p A.M. P.M. WEATHER A.M.: (f..cu.ta:-r 7z,47ccA P.M.: VISITORS: MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT SUPERINTENDENT: j�,,. q.' „ 441 - Y .; K ,, q ._ FOREMAN: OPERATORS: i ' L ABORERS: 2 SURVEYORS: FLAGMEN: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: (!,ti &p .. 2 ?Y.itu_ *i-. ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: •A.M. P.M. STREETS CLOSED: TIME: WORK: Ae «, Lop” Sc + /o,-/f_ s(./.fit.J( h,t -0S . i /7 r4790 A-4CP iti S ?flt -C.../ Iv F-, t�l - VNaz-k( j n.c so,✓ . /IA 1 G iS Y Lim C. £Ok.c 'r C Riot sal ) R'c - tLO c od ,<-" n - t - 1 - -7. 30 . - 1775 c4a ss in ., (continued on back) TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: •TILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: PAGE _ OF __ DATE: / / TIME: WORK: f ' m „ a f r y - s r r � n c r A/4 - . LCO►. n, TPN C ACCOUNT OF WORK (CONT'D) 75,5- 'ilk 7- \\ ( rti >i `� c:.rt,a, i wa r ew'l �l .7. C.° . F -a+r.. .'f o amt. l / ' 3- /IC fit' 7 — f -- /- Gorr Petz -r ry...” ern ate , 734-r yta, �' • • INSPECTORS H. DAILY .. ,REPORT INSPECTOR: ,CQr / %/s PROJECT NO.: gs�,4 .. PROJECT: RS; ran7k , .q"-,/ Ardt',frnn CONTRACTOR:.// Cnr/ Lt,g,n1 Cnr,r1 - seedy) WORK . PERIOD: r, - r lo . A.M. :Jo P.M. WEATHER A.M. ,e 34-# P.M..: perm% r'�,.S ..7o a VISITORS: SUPERINTENDENT: Tarr FOREMAN: OPERATORS: LABORERS: SURVEYORS: FLAGMEN: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: A.M. STREETS CLOSED: TIME: WORK: Orr / �6‹�:�6 ` l ..�, of �N. L ,i,vi/bpd 7/a � > .rip /-04/ it // Atom fern it «o,r,0%2 /,r.✓ .fr,iv ,CY) Afet I/ /Ca 7 1 Ale11404 /O - r,d 1#2,-'n /e 7 ,4 ,r,cfc /4.d , i9 erect se meta e, MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS S%4} C tf') tr . sii &Prf / 6evn # ,, Orl i'nm,rlQ,a -i REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: P.M. 3rd continued on back) TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: . CITIZENS CONCERNS: •TILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: PAGE _ OF _ DATE: 9 /z• / if TIME: ACCOUNT : .OF WORK (CONT'D) WORK: ,sd - new /ii/t /LT/, /%7/�4Je Z Acti.e /y 2X H % lit./ ✓ir <n ttra.l air w ,� /� et �/i.ci fin / /Al.edca /d Se /� / Ter /�riiiea / rivM4 P. ,r /'s . /2-240 1 ;e1 1 . /2-240 1 ;e1 1 11 7 - ,91, /t a >.: -v. are ret,! Adio if • I6 ' /fierbLCtca CYI.: /7'P . e.aVe / le' zaceeke.• AM Are-V44/4.7 et A..' Kre efi r 74enGFi e r -C;1 tfae . �� ine M; aPcr .7,c .�Jeiir� NnnG e7,-7 741:f preyek, f .a r / ror> a, /4'i- uJ ,x,r 14- tP■, 7""` • iq INSPECTOR'S: DAILY REPORT INSPECTOR: � r /rrer 4/5k s PROJECT: . P4- erurn/k en gdd.'1 /on CONTRACTOR: kC' lrn (/ 62,,.n,4 acnrf -.%.4) WORK PERIOD: A.M. P.M. WEATHER A.M.: %,;(/ _P.M.: ,— %,, VISITORS: SUPERINTENDENT: MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT ii. 7vner FOREMAN: PROJECT NO:: gra/4' Cr° OPERATORS: Z LABORERS: 2 SURVEYORS: FLAGMEN: OTHERS: / / EQUIPMENT USED: (' ;F Z�s -1ine i//�r<rt�r car> r sr uli /ntcr frr /nick' ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: A.M. P.M. STREETS CLOSED: TIME: WORK: Z / rrrr,ve� /l ei / //o . /c% / rt/ / pm.. : en./ � ,IW n!7?rcl t/rr7 r - r n 4 rot fZS c nr / 1/1 - floc tai.;er r �?nr_`i .%e74,cec.� "1704,7A0 / / 7 TO / / il/9iY 7e.:0,-”. / t 4) di e . _ . :<-/ c/ / / en /� 'wl TEST ,4,,,a/ 11P d /Y' 7 c� +�/ Ai1 // was y'n tc✓ /lObn fi p�'rKorri OH j a/1. /r ' 7 ` � 0nt-1 7//.r K'r /npefi r re a/d dee /4'4 Pn 21,76K ,1..A!1/4.,n ,,),r% _ 7$4. ui- 6- / 94,7) 7 (continued on back) TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: O TILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: PAGE OF DATE: 9 /» / qS-" TIME: ACCOUNT OF WORK (CONT')) WORK: Zees ,s; Z ii�,rm,i/� %.n 74.0 f- %lo/ .9 r riche/6* p 4 ,riruc ", b..i/ -i,5,9 ./ii L iafl "4 / a S // 4,-,7 ,1.14/ /4, / en / rrp�r,-/ /on .y�roimtdt�rr J.4ace ' e �nirr //4 ,r lif,e/g 7Y' /e k-'r..r1nik 2" /-21S.' bn • • INSPECTOR'S -DAILY REPORT INSPECTOR: ,4 rjyy PROJECT: ..emir/ ,4n 7 - CONTRACTOR: ,E'C �� /.r (.77,4,44 -.fr3) WORK PERIOD: A.M. P.M. WEATHER A.M.: e P.M.: €a4 47;p 6 . VISITORS: MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT SUPERINTENDENT: car r L'..yr /2er FOREMAN: OPERATORS: 4 LABORERS:. Zr- SURVEYORS: - FLAGMEN: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: ,_5,77,,,r etc" 0y /� f — ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: STREETS CLOSED: TIME: WORK: O // lnnron T! 4 rift //: +r .ri:✓� .fees rent ( A.M. P.M. REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: .PROJECT NO:: qs ;/,q 4, / fi+nm /Y/L/ 'l .T4c MA/ An X 5s s / / .FI -P re i . ;Ari /% e7 /G a -nc4 c / ,044 ...tee-wt. // 44,e .1 n,&,, -tr .:��: .041-e e /cC� -72') .t% S.€ Jeer /Meeker. pep1 ntenn( e • 6:4", s(r.,Jn- <.! ✓J 47 . t'n.P! /r -.tL .. 9 Ym 'M ( ` -.e>r t G..trr .C-+: �a. �� C , f,C) /2 i- `i/ c Ain./ / �orrs 'trr�y/ 4ae-i f; //, --end � / r rrec447, -,e; j' n. S� /.,stn �. wr 4'n.' / .r a n, (continued on back) TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: •TILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: PAGE OF DATE: J / ��4/ 2C 77 at' ACCOUNT OF WORK (CONT'D) TIME ' WORK: ,t%/ // er/ 7 ` - � i.��`� /n A//w R nr/ y 4 i / o.,r / r' �-r el /I oc.9 /774 /aced CS / eaa /-4i /Xe ,✓' 6rnrry-i/ �n. / G / fz�r _ /j/ tint glen( rq ,eel /arse, /, ..r,s AA. '74 ,// rvnn,!Cr 4...414" ,n4v/ ot.:y/ •Br.f An-tr 4,4 Agri Tt ir� ,.., r7/yr, // ado /r' -/( f/4 Are", .TCrt- >n ra rri f C�1'i / 29 1{; k .44-04 t tr— rAmel prncn.darfr. 74r inn of 2,h I OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: cvn- /4P. Lc1CC/ ends. MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT Sitrsieo tff INSPECTOR'S -:. DAILY. REPORT i . . INSPECTOR: ,Cary- / 7/s PROJECT: /7,4,.„,/„*(- �/,F r r d Ad CONTRACTOR: lel' �n /(n C�,,r7Z -.C4) WORK PERIOD: A.M. P.M. WEATHER A.M.: C /�,r,/ P.M.: VISITORS: PROJECT NO2: .76 SUPERINTENDENT: :2 n ,y„ year FOREMAN: OPERATORS: Z ' LABORERS: 2 SURVEYORS: FLAGMEN: ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: A.M. ..P.M. STREETS CLOSED: TIME: WORK: 6'24 1/,a fed ,r,�F. a e�:', ?o OMe /r n-r/ rnnrt4 /n. ;,//c 71,c. . frcc,Cr /ke /fa //17# eg f' n,yr/ A-'1,4 7 ,,,i / Q �C ,,- 7404e F 7ha i / %, d� L'� / , l'n / rr 74t1 c� �.L, - 44 // on S > Y2r ∎4 r 6Z » ■n / ,4y,4' /� //' 'f) / a4, - , rir �„ 11 Hq LS> / . f. ./lei, 1 /` Mr .rdo /7` ./ / e- e4 .�rfr. S-`, ,4e f� Co.s�A /� c �J (continued on back) TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: •TILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: PAGE OF DATE: 7 / ;aj / 9r" COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day; any problems and their solutions) A4 -lep c.: i.6ca4Tto0 AT 'THE PiltA / c9F TtiE C E3iT TO .5Aw.VA r.3nrr . f�` So LL eiAS LFIC4TInt° AO citt -pyt. A .J4 15L5 EaiR Tkte Ss1c4Ttoutfc @R ri CWE LA) TtiE ta QM: u)AL IL Tt ►..a5 rant Looex Lc:4-)__TIE5 LaSbE 124m I 3 ntiyst"LP -3D fir? us - L SRI va of TNL.AwD PPC,,PLc- _, (AS�S 6P PDC.T79(L F JPk.t�S1S RE51`tt -TS Wst VAT al P.YL Aj)r�ROJC. _1.5 r+roni7N5 cc 4U.AIZEI'nEfirS OptL CLA ELeicrlt».) REST cs_TS USE Pic A lf -t ep PrSPrE, &4% p; 4- l or i de•Ato.x-1 F¢ot i • . l• .+ to . •T t • ► a ■ - g a E O e WAS _L TAY - -6 Ptoi`!� nwaa 51 12t LEFT lb trpTt-1 —(2.O FPr`M FLK)tSHED t coeAAt Sk, E o . TA- . • u nn -. • c . A ! ' t a 4- 2_ / '1 'TESTS t - .0 F'enrn Pt.N LSFIEA r_3 c . /(i?SLtsTS 21F Wilt .ec pSE" m 9_uc6 LADNLYEIt . AtR ,Kit E • CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. t &U� /JJAcct'1L CONTRACTORl REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTOR J SUBCONTRACTOR AGRA E &E Field Representative C42.. AGRA E &E Project Manager - -G$i Contractors Representative Date_b_fe1A Continued ❑ _ PROJECT NAME Placie 0/4 a., P 3 Aaa J a-t 5 PROJECT No. /? - 131( DATE C1125/51 C. FIELD REPORT Na 0 i PAGE / OF / LOCATION ARRIVAL TIME DAY OF WEEK S S 0 T F CLIENT OR OWNER 6 C AtR ,Kit E • CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. t &U� /JJAcct'1L CONTRACTORl REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTOR J SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE /PHONE No. AGRA E&E FIEL REPRESENTATIVE Or AGRA E &E PROJECT MANAGER Aesidc -0 WEATHER Rl coLL- EQUIPMENT USED e AG RA Earth & Environmental AGRA Earth & Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day; any problems and their solutions) i / " • • ? . L Te - �a a. i1' ' ,s as 'S N � %: � CC- • /LS cbV 34AJcyAR r &24 1'9Q ALL) a I#W aSeieU /C'FFt ( $na .FiLI._ nntc t44C fl/ -�.x) na 'I _ - • • .514T7SF • CCs. ....' 4" so ' °p J At stvA 40 + fl' Odeon JJcu ; 7a 4-pp n c .srta t13+ 90 Ar t Alp 4 'N-t.C'c fQ...AC)c • ARRIVAL TIME DAY OF WEEK SSMTWOF CLIENT OR OWNER - —b r a N 5 4:4 CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. B, ace- 1 Al Ac ICS. CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA E &E FIELD REPR SENTATIVE L ; tt-LiE k AGRA ESE PROJECT MANAGER Be' 4, es oc_is A Dee', WEATHER dtot�4 I elm 1' OO � �/ J� �/ /n� // Representative Ittoh- - taiSi�ider r'r Li Manager �tl AGRA E &E Field Re AGRA j g -•-•-••• p E &E Project Contractor's Representative Datea/AFC/ ` Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME .C[captUA/.[c ec v 5 3°' ,4bbinon) PROJECT No. /2 - /3c/ FIELD REPORT No. 0.2. LOCATION l AL t o )el DATE �, Q / PAGE /OF 7 • ARRIVAL TIME DAY OF WEEK SSMTWOF CLIENT OR OWNER - —b r a N 5 4:4 CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. B, ace- 1 Al Ac ICS. CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA E &E FIELD REPR SENTATIVE L ; tt-LiE k AGRA ESE PROJECT MANAGER Be' 4, es oc_is A Dee', WEATHER dtot�4 I elm EQUIPMENT USED AGRA Earth & Environmental AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7(94) DAILY FIELD REPORT AG RA Earth & Environmental PROJECT No. 62 - /3[ ARRIVAL TIME . CLIENT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE // PHONE No. CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA E &E PROJECT MANAGER FIELD REPORT No. o3 l OF DAY OF WEEK SSMTWT© COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day; any problems and (heir solutions) Sppic Fort Sr4 r a_ a r_ Ere_ a 'r • • • Anzil SA/ I • • J ••; fra ♦ • 4 ten CLoin • 4Sf 4. y • . a. :.• • '' uT • — • a • • 30 4 r 1 9 OR v7 tow e2" t, Pr SI / . tar /n) °A re4.44.4 M nGRA E &E Field Representative 14-2.1,L ��n Contractor's Representative AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) uu AGRA E &E Project Manager Date a9 4.5 DAILY FIELD REPORT y ar Av� OOP LL� Continued ❑ COMMENTS (Describe work completed duriig the day. any problems ant their solutions) e� den cA) „Ti?C to C t6 r_ AwlD t LFcs • as No . • v LA,_..._ FitL scat m& SP43Ct C .5 C(C Q AtJn zi r •s KU( Few [t3 At 1F. CLIENT OR OWNER . S l��LCU CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTOR _ _ . : 0 LIEF estaa(m AT -srA .).. - : • 4 13t ` 0 _ -t-rt Q ► Ire a es - ¶l4 • . 41-t q . e a t F t N AL C/1i..tr t uarn L�TN WEATHER eur:D0 - r — • ••• r Vs A._t.t- .li a • .rr. � - ' t(L3 - _ _ it 1 - _ c t o T, CCnN x_9LCftt ?POOP 420« 14 Y 6P- tsr 0 F'i', tSd ialAi R AGRA E &E Project Manager AGRA E &E Field Representative - -11 Contractor's Representative Date (. /so / Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME , t�ive-RcORtk &dos 3 Rbbinoea PROJECT No. /02 FIELD REPORT No. oV LOCATION AC. U DA / /933 T PAGE / OF / / ARRIVAL DAY OF WEEK ©SMTW TF CLIENT OR OWNER . S l��LCU CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA ESE FIELD REPRES ( ), JO t / F. NTATIVE (.1)e2 2A c rJ AGRA E &E PROJECT MANAGER I P Brie, oY_ EQUIPMENT USED WEATHER eur:D0 - AGRA Earth & Environmental DAILY FIELD REPORT AGRA Earth S Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day; any problems and the solot'ons) C (2C)(1_) t.Ke (SP /4 N / /'E n f) ...0 ?P) natal )6 141.3D 1 Ae.f FLJ pRLa. Lp.•._ • a •r b 1': • qr ft O C ire _ . a _a'.' (.3DlrataA A■JF escrraoLLEZ> rd al-) rnrRQ FILL < rPrA'1F Rc,(Stf- CO Sf s3Elz- 1-4 t3E PsWas=4 b 0yR Ati r e1(Xfl -t• PW5 ' S 'i() -I 30 -K"1 - Ao�c�r cbzc si'A pi t h_`.L1ltJ�- -p -k 3a. l cTI\A ?tab a r:k Pull R ecine F ROC l 11.D OP Pti- ( ( ktec. a Al. • mi. ^ l ^, _ � . to :' _ '- re .-MU> Wri1 -0 caSaLiC Yt_ Mm h St )E---re ,St-"7el ) / e P t t A mi (so 5 Fs4 S -f AP- 5 CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. ti 1 i aTh I kT-t-9f _ CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA E�SE FIELD REPRES TATIVE AGRA E&E PROJECT d4`T� 17 Q3.r)i N pn D+ � Wl LL\� lj c AGRA E &E Field Representative LC21 � r r 4 AGRA E &E Project Manager jr 1 -? Contractors Representative Date (0 /'! 9.S Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME .40" � • • iJP : . ►► La. PROJECT No. • -fall FIELD REPORT No. 05 LOCATION - r n = - - DATE rr �- � �✓J 7� PAGE OF ARRIVAL TIME DAY OF WEEK S SOM T W T F CLIENT OR OWNER T 4T (� 1.15tr` CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTO n CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA E�SE FIELD REPRES TATIVE AGRA E&E PROJECT d4`T� 17 Q3.r)i N pn D+ � Wl LL\� lj c WEATHER P CL.Oo. > k- S - ` I1__ EQUIPMENT USED. 3SC CJ1 • {Sn-L AM / CM .5 -pes_ Tpim -K Ft40 U18, 0-$« t of , r AGRA Earth & Environmental DAILY FIELD REPORT AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) INSPECTOR'S:. DAILY REPORT • INSPECTOR: X ',.,—i.... Jnyl PROJECT NO.: 9r / PROJECT: '€4-ercat /k 3.14 40 :e„ CONTRACTOR: 7cG Cnidr_Zay,aWORK PERIOD: A.M. P.M. WEATHER . A.M.: cC ei yr° P.M.: /114;7 <i° VISITORS: / SUPERINTENDENT: / 2 7 „ �eanor — Cr�hf OPERATORS: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT LABORERS: FOREMAN: SURVEYORS: ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: A.M. P.M. STREETS CLOSED: / TIME: WORK: , rn 4? o%r,j .sf Z AAJ . �rr� L'nnf�ac /»17 ,e4.4/ / /f iorec 3S of" /1;4" o /.a r�9nv.:+ re .rnee %ei / /rte/ Z ��JJ t: . 76-1- - / 1/in of r r/741.44:27 II n e've /. 2' i / a., r��n o � 2 I 4rr //i2 °.f A nn 5 - n,..AgX Si-- n/ ,4d/Zi/ n 7 4' t z ),fec- 4 /Lnrl� 4r4 /fit ir.; /-7/i efoy f Di-! llli � !', �, /irrn� .4 rcifr^oi� T. c'/ve` erivrn'e - /ON ,tr7cYPC %lrts . .C/ i.-7r r/J 4rd /9417/14 n r n / ewer/ i3 ernr /e2le P-xc r A Jer�. , indenc7 C/ frs Y''. cnei c /ns,o, "44,4r /Choi i ire ,rf�` c/ i✓n ann , s / / / s/e - /d. sn �, (continued on back) TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: •TILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: FLAGMEN: PAGE OF DATE: /d /?_ /�i'.�" jite COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day; any problems and their solutions) L)o_ W n , / :;,-,, • AL or„ tzt )ATIOU tn c,fwalt0/1/4D __ r • 'AS 6. , • tl)? gal J.11 a. _ ' - lb (SO ee .0 iAL5 O i Or bi A ' - a, 0 .!vd • Aj w , A-5 3EflJ refik -i-rn3 si FtpisJ [ A9% i4r 14441 ,01401.F to 2s @nei tCudId3_ ri • j 14W"W . DAY OF WEEK SSMTW(D CLIENT OR OWNER — CLIENT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTORY ACTOR ( CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA E &EE FIELD REPRESE TATIVE AGRA E &E Field Representative L� �a- a AGRA E &E Manager` 6 Project Contractors Representative Date ��( S � 9 r 5 Continued ❑ _AP- EQUIPMENT USED PROJECT NAME eIC XtLUALt( � ,� 5 2 ✓ yD PROJECT No. 'a - 13t1 DA E / 5, IS- FIELD REPORT No. O(P PAGE 1 OF LOCATION ARRIVA TIM= DAY OF WEEK SSMTW(D CLIENT OR OWNER — CLIENT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTORY ACTOR ( CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA E &EE FIELD REPRESE TATIVE AG EBE PROJECT __�]MANAGER � (� WEATHER _AP- EQUIPMENT USED AGRA Earth & Environmental DAILY FIELD REPORT AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) COMMENT (Describe work completed during the cab i3v S LR Ul .Scux - I day; any problems and their solutions) fl) � . L - r•• Pc. IN _ -. ~ Sott 7t ,+ J'D 5t'7L)tc _is. , E%D /CE5 r _T.ibl aor, �2 c�F RCJ 7C NMS cn,Jrnuue-O C.t)l t cpr ep-p Irsn-7ZDi4 CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTOR a. rJ . 1 a A . 4 • ( • t o AGRA E &E PROJECT MANAGER c ,s tM a4,,a W /Jl16 - r 4c oy 'bP / err?" ?St P cMAER EQUIPMENT USED e SA 2r7t R WEATHER 0_ LC1- -D Lf ,SC) J � � '— c / AGRA E &E Project Manager a ei / r AGRA E &E Field Representative Contractors Representative ���� Date L V Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME PROJECT No. FIELD REPORT No. LOCATION DATE // /a /6 !.S ARRIVAL TIME /Q{ / PAGE PAGE 1 / L OF` DAY OF WEEK S S M T W T(0 CLIENT OR OWNER �erttJ S Oat &-- CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA E &E FIELD REPRESENTATIVE te` L L� ` A AGRA E &E PROJECT MANAGER c ,s tM a4,,a W /Jl16 - r 4c oy 'bP / err?" ?St P cMAER EQUIPMENT USED e SA 2r7t R WEATHER 0_ LC1- -D Lf ,SC) J AGRA Earth & Environmental AGRA Eadh & Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT PROJECT NAME EI oerz soAt r S 31°D. PROJECT No. /0. ^13c( FIELD REPORT No. e LOCATION DATE PAGE / OF / K ARRIVAL TIME DAY OF WEEK M T W T F CLIENT OR OWNER CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. Si - 1 Inne11. 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA E &E FIELD REPRESENT TIVE - AGRA E &E PROJECT MANAGER (R di r F 1 at _bes5_ —E zisz EQUIPMENT USED _L WEATHER PI Ctt,c_t_t>L, AGRA Earth & Environmental AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day; any problems and their solutions) x'51 PiAc St 5 I»..) 1-&)P i9 (!l) AGRA E &E Field Representative L �, C �o .� '�, AGRA E &E Project Manager Contractors Representative Date it t1- Continued ❑ COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day; any problems and their soft ions} _ . l - l` • • t. 1 + •• L . (. ��,,pp���� • S J , \\ ow ( � a 1 elJV KJS3F 2OI 1 \ i.. LOCATION DATE IOI 9 5 — a /b t-\1" CrtitllJUF rr ? SA'J VCIL SGOJ(et r Z' A-efPtn .57CIA J15 -QT) t A)iZrFw SP" CP QCVT1 3 cLES - R°) Pwiox, DAY OF WEEK StS I T W T F CLIENT OR OWNER D RAO C4 u t C CLIENT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. f"- MO4>Ak..3 f S PW -C7tM t Orrei AeV• 0vt. ► US.. 1 ■.. IA% ._ i" _Fiber O `i. - I . • `A- :. _i • •. • • 4 . SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. et 0 A - ! . AGRA E &E PROJECT MANAGER T't ` J 1\ ,OL WEATHER • - - C CUS 4 EQUIPMENT USED t AGRA E &E Field Representative - / :erg �� / / 11 \ 1 AGRA E &E Project Manager +•-r / - . Contractor's Representative Date ( n 3-79e-- Continued ❑ PROJECT E fl Ca _ ro2 3� PROJECT No. to -( 3Lt FIELD REPORT No. 09 LOCATION DATE IOI 9 5 — PAGE OF1 ARRIVAL TIME DAY OF WEEK StS I T W T F CLIENT OR OWNER D RAO C4 u t C CLIENT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA E &E FIELD REPRESENTATIVE )1 �t AGRA E &E PROJECT MANAGER T't ` J 1\ ,OL WEATHER • - - C CUS 4 EQUIPMENT USED AGRA Earth & Environmental AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day; arty problems and their sdutions) FIELD REPORT No. /0 PAGE OF LOCATION DATE p 4040/45- CA L . F F I t t C 11 L S s - ) [ l S__ ARRIVAL TIME t0 46vt DAY OF WEEK SSMTQNTF J /.i -he rc e s env ri,v�y 40fieF iT .4' c 1319L _ r n - re)PP sMaasito L) Q BAe .kt l al snn. ti- Ors £4()Fnt LA 3r 13 L.11 - '\ '91_4. ` —6 ; -It r — •5 - • La _ • r_a rle Sib LIZ .r • • • ckt Losria_t.au% Ftvc trtlmaAcn -s F'Trr AGRA E &E Field Representative ! �•LO! ^— AGRA E &E Project Manager Date / 0 - - . 7 — = _ . - 4 Contractor's Representative . _ _ _ . Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME Pi t)tapr.)AAt.v ,Q c 3 14"14) Abr(tana - PROJECT No. /c2 - /3l FIELD REPORT No. /0 PAGE OF LOCATION DATE p 4040/45- ARRIVAL TIME t0 46vt DAY OF WEEK SSMTQNTF CLIENT OR OWNER �lFyS-{, S flint tD c., s FZ& CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTOR J CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE /PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA E &E FIELD REPRESENTATIVE t LA /L (1 / ' 47)flt AGRA E &E PR JJEECT MANAGER A4 RJ T 1LV EQUIPMENT USED WEATHER - C 1 - /111 .b•L/ /kJ4 P sk I AI AGRA Earth & Environmental AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT PROJECT NAME R.l l]t1c AJL� RC..L' LOCATION � ATwl` !X ° f.� PR JE _ t i FIELD REPORT No. 11 DATE / /[� ` w / (1/ 7,5": PAGE 1 OF / ARRIVAL TIME 'l H A',. zo; 330 /T DAY OF WEEK S S M )W T F CLI �+ OWNER -.. . CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRALTO CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE /PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA .ES,E FIELD REPRES n TATIVE AGRA ESE PROJECT ��MANAGER WEATHER CLou. -air lge9e4) EQUIPMENT USED AGRA Earth & Environmental COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day; any problems and their solutions) • ., - )E AC.EtnrtetiT oP F3Ac 5"G EILL a 561 Ls IL. c �F s 1 Po a> EMS\ SAi.wMpcab e i rA►1F, AGRA E &E Field Representative Lk 1 ? f. c 3 �' ` higag/ [ AGRA E &E Project Manager Contractors Representative Date w / /lAc5 Continued ❑ AGRA Eanh & Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT • • • COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day; any problems and their solutions) BA _. . .s er •14. ' E . tit ^ 1 . 1 a . 1 • etp . cat3C GS c __ • _ C : I 4. B 50e_cJeQC'S. Le rat: _•:,r v. A ' ¼ - alt. ; r 2 c rOP ,t t tL NM 2>ERt3 AtCcf?(isNtE) 2'(ff Ra.TCGCF p t ARRIVAL TIME. // :50 DAY OF WEEK S S M T W TO CLIENT OR OWNER ' CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No: GENERAL CONTRACTOR° CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA E &E FIELD REPRE NTATIVE — A. AGRA E&E PROJECT MMANAGER AJ.aa : CT r ca- 'o wi - / WEATHER / ? C I- 0 oa) k1 1 g cil'trt_ USED AGRA ESE Field Representative (-t / Contractors Representative 1-4 - a EILAGRA E &E Project Manager a. ��• Date 1/f3/9 Continued ❑ PROJECT NAME el, UPI? IV*r.g CQ g .1 PROJECT No. 4.2-/.3i( DATE !6//3/gc FIELD REPORT No. /P- PAGE 1 OF LOCATION ARRIVAL TIME. // :50 DAY OF WEEK S S M T W TO CLIENT OR OWNER ' CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No: GENERAL CONTRACTOR° CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA E &E FIELD REPRE NTATIVE — A. AGRA E&E PROJECT MMANAGER AJ.aa : CT r ca- 'o wi - / WEATHER / ? C I- 0 oa) k1 1 g cil'trt_ USED AGRA Earth & Environmental AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the day; any problems and their solutkns) PROJECT No. « - IBLl FIELD REPORT No. /3 PAGE 1OF/ LOCATION DATE n i01u0ISE- aigai st_tC T a t s c c E D ot_) XhDtAiT A hoe o t o 9f -Tt2 z zttP Ant t 1 t '„�_LL! SflLLS CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. _Q( .5e-vi )ccP s SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA E &E FIELD REPRESENTATIVE • l t .. i.. . • 'i {i• _ WEATHER CI- CUL I Q_ttna EQUIPMENT USED ; • t /T 'Y . • &li �. a i t �.:.. - . ' g�i !.• 9S -'71 a —4. Er — t + !r 'A 411— 7e ubl7 .. T it AGRA E &E Field Representative i-� s� Jm C/j�- AGRA E &E Project Manager " Contractors Representative Date /C1/46 /Q5 - Continued ❑ PROJE9IAME R� i)t) r2 e 3 crtos ? t PROJECT No. « - IBLl FIELD REPORT No. /3 PAGE 1OF/ LOCATION DATE n i01u0ISE- ARRIVAL TIME . $': 4 10 Aun DAY OF WEEK S SQ )T W T F CLIENT OR OWNER CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONTRACTORS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA E &E FIELD REPRESENTATIVE AGRA E &EPROJECT I (A � � NAGE � R ' P _ WEATHER CI- CUL I Q_ttna EQUIPMENT USED AGRA Earth & Environmental AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 7/94) DAILY FIELD REPORT • INSPECTOR'S .. DAILY INSPECTOR: eCariy- '/li/// SUPERINTENDENT: OPERATORS: OTHERS: /9eron FOREMAN: rf r TRAFFIC. SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: STREETS CLOSED: TIME: WORK: , e MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT LABORERS: ,/ SURVEYORS: A.M. c d REPORT ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS �r / PROJECT NO.: ism /g4 m PROJECT: ,r4'..-/,,M ? z / %r/a; 1 74h i .tere At CONTRACTOR: ,e WORK PERIOD:. A.M. P.M. WEATHER .. A.M.:. Com7.9' fl • P.M.: Ka/dca4c!�r VISITORS: Cons" FLAGMEN: - EQUIPMENT USED: e.t. rr,. f >,rt 6454 /7 n/eMr/ /x.12. P.M. P i d 4 ri . er /17. - 747 / ) /r/� /Y� i'v✓r'i -a,', �� it r in� , - , P%" ; /J I / / //'6 4 y e , 7�7 /4e r /o�m./ ///6'/ 4Z . N' /J' / � /J /J��is // , s%cY /t // e' /- J/,P � iJP o, / %else! n z , or4. r ce9ex 7(')i t 't f 7[%r %C n ><n /�7 / 7 /i// /// /r /t//7 J /7N 7 04 /yew R� /r lip/ r4' 7^ ,F1.5/ `7/ /ild`/ 9' 74' , / //Pty e ,i #vr �/,e /ire /"/ff ee4 /17# e _ jh., (continued on back) TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: A TILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: PAGE OF _ DATE: ie / /e' /pr G� c� TIME: WORK: // ,ca/ / ,4 ep) "� y.�u / s /A-7 �ic C / or/4c7 o,n e',:recntd C.A l.'�f 4 irm.e, f / on /e len // /ec 4nb 9,Y ACCOUNT OF WORK (CONT'D) �YC ' (/ �' Y • Ceii9er i� v / /� o.. rc -m /Y/f/ C 76 47:// 0'E //,, 04,e,47 v9ree � e:13 Y 4 . er «a.✓ 4 q e y 4-en, 9 crr rile ,7 ,4r - f e 1 . t' oo.>e{ 0 :7W .Cnii t ‘crne , / .�alarl Aire karat T 14, -, " 4,'r / dreg' u. c s %'/ � , /6 A' tat •71 u4ece. ,- ,'�u�'as Te e co s d a c / •S ee L/ iii a .n 4 -e':- / os ar de ,tnee44,c G�(ie/7r9c(9 eto, %/ c ,.�� irr .r r�r� fzrc/ rh 7`le /` c' . t ( Oil Cep' r ?rfra c �r ��s a.r AC/ rimer �,� /,A ,7 // /r.G n' //0 cC2,,,g rn 7 • INSPECTOR'S . DAILY REPORT INSPECTOR: PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: WEATHER VISITORS: TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: "TILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: SUPERINTENDENT: OPERATORS: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: env /1% s /e /per ee/ 2nd Adrr. /%n, arc/ Ad///,n f'C consirue n. WORK PERIOD: A.M. P.M. A.M.: r /v<rr .S P.M.: l,/e.lrr boa MANPOWER . AND EQUIPMENT FOREMAN: PROJECT NO:: p, LABORERS: y SURVEYORS: / FLAGMEN: REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER f0l,7 e n s' /o /q /t ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: A.M. P.M. STREETS CLOSED: TIME: WORK: e"2", A ah .r, /. er/ /2 �.>c >o) A /er /i Ay .r/1/Yr't Lj ' Kr �./J/Jr/K'I!f'l e,#, rtsrn y"/'f / ,-S-- 7 / S /ocz cz' er and w'e a'- ?les /cal "�'Y©m -w/ �,Ff JU1h A yY7,a , end /Jf 714_°- .n u6 / 5 1 , 117 /J/l ce4 TO //.//f/ 6 r. C &Jk ' r V i q 47/1 // � G 7 ,tff/ 6 0 /'�//� ".0 ,4,-4, /n ,4P Pr d 7 a4a,6. 7T i� S '0, e / c -<�r mrr!%y ,f 7, 'C,4 17 G� uJRS .lPCCc/ O To / /6. 7 a- rnet -e At / ,V %r/,,/ , / . / / sue / /O y7e /urge o- //a We 6c (continued on back) CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: PAGE OF DATE: /r / /i.r— T /!c TIME: WORK: ACCOUNT OF WORK (CONT'D) .tC cae rsTiuc1.'on ,V477 / %c( cr ci ouoe // t .f 7/ /tr "r Si/ //1 >ofv /Gawr 4 4,7 -. YO/Yif f-( /eC m % <n Z, c, iJ! /�?/� /l�" •roil, fi ,reeaer nT /% // (/C Tn n4ida/ s er, 7'1, Co en 0 r or� „ a_ c e 0 se -- r-dr,1/47 Jam/ /_i XG /� G i' rr / v f . cv r ✓Cy en le Pere A er-✓ TG cl4 sa ACA 51” /#cl - e--c- to r.� octA h/e /enema /`, t- d' - /O APi,Cn . G./ // / / r i / _ .< / ' Y� >/' T �� % /4c. / / taro Se /r . ,r1 /rP d/'i+? fE;rl r l'.�ric!1�3J'Cc t2Jl�u/ ` � „ �JGUY�G� /G.Z.249 / q /r � / Ad! r . r. � / rat ,4C / ton,'c o'1eFrd.a-1 Aft /. ere / �/t! Or/ /At /a o, 5' X ° / • /91.i6'H ii / +mil r -T�f P cy % -r&r- e-06 '4'S .4.f// 0r°tnperp ' n c'i .ccc erre/C cl.fd /' cu ✓J, "el rer 9 ° '"Y PROJECT NAME Zo& WALL o2"` S' C1/2 "12-46 Meg )070,0 PROJECT No 12 - 131 / FIELD REPO T No <7 LOCATION DATE 0 v ` ` /I+� PAGE OF ARRIVAL TIME 9:oo AO/ DAY OF WEEK SSMT e CLIENT� \O'W. (///��� A2 l �)CC VJ "AU Q KIM ce v CLIENT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No —' GENERAL CONTRACTOW CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. EFIELD REP ESENTATIVE AGRA E & & // t J DI & Z AGRA � E p PROJECT MANAGER ,,`` u0 L✓ WEATHER eceg. �po4 EQUIPMENT USED Q4r sACJc agar Lark& /sEktr me. LOAA/Z -p 7,L Cs._ Ai roc a: car. AGRA Earth & Environmental DAILY FIELD REPORT COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the clay; any problems and their solutions) Agee, le-71 rye sere 10 04500 / AeE-7nEM nC BMX /lcc ants An./J przeo ?rl / INS o f ,s4int Sctcl S / ?nvnn v 6P Aite& Fur sty LS HA 5 eoumuu_ b rn Rpp2o srs a I 1-'70 . PAesinfur op A#et -lu. ...71e4-5 FQ ,e. S[ AC . &xote.E3 S rah. AGRA E &E Field Representative A r' LO AGRA E &E Project Manager Contractor's Representative Date /a / AGRA Earth & Environmental. Inc (Rev.'! • Continued ❑ COMMENTS (Describe work completed during the da Y. any problems and the solutons) f•ttrtLT' /:p,I? CctEAS—, FOR Mr AVW 774 A•l> SOC.t7T-/ S :5 OP a DiAt1A FIELD REPORT No. iS PAGE / OF 5 SotL. A=/JE- n .atBS tJA4vc Beni pcAC.eb) 14AJD POwtpAcmt a ) .P11i-)G d.4,00s' / r )ntl .30re(F /r#4r 11stJ al-Jake t44,. Are) 7-STEO AAJD _Os 431 ♦ a (Fir OIJ FC• 7 _ sui /3 /V)Fe1 -S i'44i'44-A_ .� Spe .P 1 �A • Alt Csirasr DAY OF WEEK SSMTW TO n ♦ �` }' 14' !/ • J / " 1 Si ' M �R+. 4f,_, • •°°..1,5 - CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA ESE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE ILACI t E b___7- A _ PROJ T MANA R 4 WEATHER C{.c)C -tot! /u9 Hr EA" ill ) EQUIPMENT USED / ir • - a de t AGRA E &E Project Manager AGRA E &E Field Representative - - Lein Date /10/26/15-- Continued ❑ Contractors Representative PROJECT NAME Rt1/4.3eYLwiAL1( a °C) . 3°' A tib rto PROJECT No. ra -43t/ DATE 5 FIELD REPORT No. iS PAGE / OF LOCATION ARRIVAL TIME 7'00 DAY OF WEEK SSMTW TO CLIENT OR OWNER —. N- 1401 CLIENT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. GENERAL CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. SUBCONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE / PHONE No. AGRA ESE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE ILACI t E b___7- A _ PROJ T MANA R 4 WEATHER C{.c)C -tot! /u9 Hr EA" ill ) EQUIPMENT USED AGRA Earth & Environmental DAILY FIELD REPORT AGRA Earth S Envronmentai. Inc. (Rev. 7/94) NAMED PROJECT NAME .A .. /� c QpD LT(nLv PROJECT No. PROJECT /02 -1311 FIELD REPQRT No /6 LOCATION DATE / CA W' /PS PAGE 2 2— OF MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. PERMIT NUMBER WEATHER Cana, CLIENT OR OWUQI No. OF SAMPLES ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR ,._, Aww - w (.-) a'dt j. Nj )H .a/11i MORTAR f . _zt ri TYPE OF MORTAR IF NO, EXPLAIN MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. ❑ NO MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) DESIGN. STRENGTH (P51) No. OF SAMPLES No. OF SAMPLES TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) MORTAR TEMP. (Deg F.) TIME TIME AIR TEMP. a'dt j. Nj )H .a/11i +P SUPPLIER IF NO, EXPLAIN MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. ❑ NO SLUMP (IN.) DESIGN STRENGTH (PSI) �A�etcrr s No. OF SAMPLES c� TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED 64` GROUT TEMP. (Deg F.) a Ark' TIME AIR TEMP. 5 1 Au A^ IEMS7ABU _; 1 a ` rr ? ,ti „`/es, IF NO, EXPLAIN SPECIFICrLOCATION ❑ NO GRIDS �A�etcrr s /-O c� e& ,crtll?rH F SuuTN .s ,tES 64` jp_c_ a Ark' IEMARKS CONTINUED 5 1 Au A^ IEMS7ABU _; 1 WEREitio FOR NCE` }a GtEP ENT,APPROyE6,PLANS , g ,. ; IF NO, EXPLAIN ■ YES ❑ NO `• &AGRA Earth & Environmental .E OF ❑ RESTEEL ❑ REINFORCED CONCRETE ❑ REINFORCED MASONRY ❑ SHOTCRETE /T � IR OTHER (Specify) �O{JC -ItEle ❑ STRUCTURAL STEEL FABRICATION ❑ STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION ❑ EXPANSION BOLTS ❑ - FIRE PROOFING EIOESTRUCTUREINSPECTED ❑ FOOTINGs ❑ AUGER CAST PILING ❑ GRADE BEAMS ❑ WALLS ® OTHER (Specify) Cu.K$S ❑ COLUMNS ❑ SLAB -ON -GRADE ❑ STRUCTURAL GRADE ❑ POST TENSIONED SLAB SUPPLIER ficsAE MIX• 7 4'6 MATERIAL TEST REPORT No. 0i SLUMP (IN.) 9 AIR CONTENT 6 0 DESIGN STRENGTH (P51) 30 -0C) No. OF SAMPLES 3 TOTAL CU YARDS PLACED CONCRETE TEMP. (Deg F.) 6 , ge TIME S TS AIR TEMP. T4� Inspector aM* x^ Pain C AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. (Rev. 11/94) Date 'Rd t MATERIAL FIELD REPORT 5 37' t v . + v L 1 -] 1� Fa. y . e.. nx L Anita DATA ' "tt " ^' ms d :� B.aiau.�a. >:� H. .a. . x+�.. -,K.I� � m � ,*' c- y 'i ' 7 > �z .*m � t3a +.. ...P... =. SUPPLIER Andgr MIX No. 790/ PLANT No. 2 ❑ Jos MIX V! i CONCRETE GROUT ❑ MORTAR ❑ FLEX BEAMS ❑ PRISMS ❑ GROUTED III UNGROUTED OTHER GRIDS TEMP. (Dep. F) YIELD/UNIT TIME TRUCK No. TICKET No. %AIR SLUMP CONC AIR WEIGHT 3 ¥5 6ta3 1/426739 51) 4 /aV «O C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. SAND LBS. H2O LBS. ADMIXTURES DESIGN STRENGTH 0 psi ® a8' DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS 4 TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED YDS AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS LOAD SIZE /0 YDS x.. LF 2`2'. ;?.� fi a.:-�....t_.auF.z..i� : r�$r :'�'Y'V r'�sca A ' s5. ❑ FOOTINGS ❑ wAas ❑ COLUMNS ❑ GRADE BEAMS ❑ SLAB/DECK ❑ SLAB ❑ PILINGS N OTHER GRIDS PAGE OF MIX No. Cfre r gg.. estlePIS 0t... MP PmF" us & .4A� /A 9sr uoeS,r ,vcfl ; OLtnj .s /].1E'S (1F PosH3 F ASH LBS. REMARKSI C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. PROJECT NAME /� ^^ - • K f u r WALK- K. r {� g 311/ PROJECT No. TEST REPORT No. 1 / LOCATION -- DATE / fi VVlI7e'1 J PAGE OF MIX No. PERMIT NUMBER WEATHER ailnal CLIENT ORow� ER � / 1 enu € E f AuJscxy ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR elintnechil ARCHITECT .a — TICK REPOIiTEDiBATCH DATA :_, � , CEMENT TYPE ❑ DESIGN • ACTUAL MIX No. CEM LBS. F ASH LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. C AGG LBS. SAND LBS. H2O LBS. ADMIXTURES AIR ENT OZ/CWT WATER ADDED • I BT I LBS. AT LBS. .'OAGRA Earth& Environmental DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED LAB ID No. TEST DATE 1 7027 I t( ( 7 FIELD CURE in .14 REMARKS AGE (DAYS) ag. SIZE (w) la )ClZ AREA (SO IN) WEIGHT (LBS) MAX LOAD (LBS) // 9 0 STRENGTH (PSI) 3qa D SET No. LAB TECH c Reviewed by " v g'k. AGM Earth & Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 11/A6) Date /o MATERIAL TEST REPORT Lvr RE:: " ITEMS INSS DARE::F i ❑ CONFORMING ❑ NONCONFORMING TEST • METHOD R'ASTM C 39 ❑ AASHTO y22 ❑ OTHER (Specify) 'COMPRESSIVE ❑ FLEXURAL. ❑ CONFORMING ❑ NONCONFORMING T; FIELD DATA r SUPPLIER .Awaa+ MIX No. 7 PLANT No. .2.0 ❑ JOB MIX CONCRETE El GROUT MORTAR II FLE( BEAMS ❑ PRISMS ❑ GROUTED • UNGROUTED ❑OTHER LOCATION TEMP. (Dog. F) YIELD/UNIT - TIME TRUCK No. TICKET No. X, AIR SLUMP GONG AIR WEIGHT B:YS aa3 4Q0739 AO f i0r di° REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. SAND LBS. //O t(0 ^/ (PSI) \\ 34C b H2O LBS. c l ( 1 .; C N I�I ,METHOD R- ASTM ❑ AASHTO T22 ❑ OTHER (Specify) ADMIXTURES I t 1(7 AIR ENT OZ/CWT WATER ADDED / 0 9 5' BT LBS. AT LBS. DESIGN STRENGTH PSI ®d` g DAYS SLUMP SPECIFICATIONS i TOTAL CU. YDS. PLACED YDS AIR CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS LOAD SIZE /0 YDS IROJECT NAME 7t04�_ CV A` . (-21)1) 3r../0 St ✓ - PROTECT No. TEST REPOT No. rte' /1 LOCATION MIX No. DATE O . � {/�J- PAGE OF ^ (ate4 ON flsPiRMA Ault /7usuotus . PERMIT NUMBER WEATHER OW Lae y STRENGTH CUENT OR rn5ER M alt) f Auus ENGINEER C AGG LBS. GENERAL CONTRACTOR l.;ltLgOAf ARCHITECT (aka— ` ';REPORTED BATCH DATA:: CEMENT TYPE ❑ DESIGN • ACTUAL MIX No. TEST IN FOOTINGS r] WALLS L i COLUMNS CEM LBS. ^ (ate4 ON flsPiRMA Ault /7usuotus er9Sr A,w3 I.CaL5% F ASH LBS. MAX LOAD (LBS) STRENGTH C AGG LBS. REMARKS TEST C AGG LBS. ,��D�AATE " 7027 C AGG LBS. (aka— REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. SAND LBS. //O t(0 ^/ (PSI) \\ 34C b H2O LBS. c l ( 1 .; C N I�I ,METHOD R- ASTM ❑ AASHTO T22 ❑ OTHER (Specify) ADMIXTURES I t 1(7 AIR ENT OZ/CWT WATER ADDED / 0 9 5' BT LBS. AT LBS. .`.. `tTU� sj ,,. • CEMENT.AREA GRIDS TEST IN FOOTINGS r] WALLS L i COLUMNS 0941zR -Cfr g2 ^ (ate4 ON flsPiRMA Ault /7usuotus er9Sr A,w3 I.CaL5% Akan+ v SD1.L.m .s'tcs !'F Pe4D MAX LOAD (LBS) STRENGTH • GRADE BEAMS SLAB/DECK SLAB ❑ PWNGS 1 OTHER REMARKS TEST ' - T �J oL� ( ,��D�AATE " 7027 7 (aka— REFERENCE FIELD REPORT No. ';. LABORATORY DATA 'Inn s DATE SPECIMANS CAST DATE SPECIMANS SUBMITTED LAB ID No. TEST FIELD CURE AGE (DAYS) SIZE (IN) AREA (SO IN) WEIGHT (LBS) MAX LOAD (LBS) STRENGTH SET No. LAB TECH TEST ' - T �J oL� ( ,��D�AATE " 7027 7 (aka— ,RY <Ih //O t(0 ^/ (PSI) \\ 34C b c l ( 1 .; C N I�I ,METHOD R- ASTM ❑ AASHTO T22 ❑ OTHER (Specify) I t 1(7 a.8" / 0 9 5' 5700 5 &fin 1 6 (I 7 AS /' II-COMPRESSIVE ❑ FLEXURAL ❑ CONFORMING ❑ NONCONFORMING - - "MARKS ( & AGRA Earth & Environmental INSPECTOR /4 444 Reviewed by AGRA Ewth & Environmental. Inc. (Rev. 11/94) REVIEWED BY Date 4367 It It MATERIAL TEST REPORT ALL ITEMS INSPECTED ARE: ❑ CONFORMING ❑ NONCONFORMING • INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: WEATHER VISITORS: EQUIPMENT USED: TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: UTILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: • II at Ket A.M.: CAPCIy /nn MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT SUPERINTENDENT: /Jean SrelczierSk,' FOREMAN: OPERATORS: y LABORERS: -/ SURVEYORS: FLAGMEN: OTHERS: r (rri >P — s itlAi y WORK PERIOD: A.M. P.M.: /262., ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS PROJECT NO.:7a/ qs - cif 7 P.M. TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: STREETS CLOSED: TIME: WORK: (Cn a f>Vi _s,i/r r/��."rr A1j r`,irh r n P v 'r:. 3r // " 7,1 n' /7114.1) L< Ah / / �/ -�A' S'%'P ` /Je P / - < '!' � / ,j / � /' Cloe C ...n icrc�$s' �J co,/ t6 2 're Z X 4r4r J // P. rewil >cS "r^ / Y/ Cc/Z. .-1t 'p %'r 4 " A.M. P.M. J / nc/ h" ,4e' / i,'l4 rip 74c° r,.r/6 rH - fi • .rnr, h r i' ' nf=' rez i t = 4J sr( tzr f,, r/i -/oc/ j .4ec n ,o,/s / /rc/ 6v4v,i 779/ J%r,; � T Sri /. /1:-rrer 4,77 4. 4 (continued on back) REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: PAGE _ OF _ DATE: /,% / zn / i> TIME: ACCOUNT OF WORK (CONT'D) WORK: Cl,-7t/ 4��, 9,7. A.17 7S- m, ff/ fled T‘ 4q 40,6c/ ' e ar /`i e rni.� w/ INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT INSPECTOR: /7, // PROJECT NO. :c/r /7 /s PROJECT: �,i- er..f/H /k 2°d�n/(✓./[aa efrci,1c+>r.'if:.,,,, 9ssz CONTRACTOR: r -t- Cn.,r7, -r c i-,•.■ WORK PERIOD: A.M. P.M. WEATHER A.M.: - /ear 5Y P.M.: c .— ss-° VISITORS: MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT SUPERINTENDENT: , Q1,0 . 7n ocz.risk/' FOREMAN: OPERATORS: y LABORERS: 4/ SURVEYORS: OTHERS: EQUIPMENT USED: FLAGMEN: ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: A.M. P.M. STREETS CLOSED: TIME: WORK: /2 >f ® s. ';w r71' 7.• .Tt' 7 /,P c4 r6 -Ar >» 2 / a r /�1 cwr6 ,i / // ile to r Ar r./ - c� /z ,trc /e �� 9 r-,,nht' ney n/1/7 .:7(/ / /rc� / / C / - toi it / . S'7&. /S 2.? 4 �C ePn, /7 7 r a r �rrrl. �i,n .- 7�PS A4.0 /,i -Jr° /47 fr / /P./ i' c L Iii, .. .rrn..7 L %i Jcc,-, ,iic,ihc /° cog ,r• C .k /'mr /f /Al " o. f7 /Sn /.c C2' %:��. - c 6/_ t/ d /4e alder /,h s e't (f en R// !i^"), Ti N /A/ C on Ti7t lic^n =� Cctr/; '7r4 / /ii/ /sr //r, 4 r/ s» /9 %o±k /ar (C ntinued on back) TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: •TILILTY /PROPERTY DAMAGE: REVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: PAGE OF _ - DATE: 4%7/ « / qs />c>, TIME: WORK: ACCOUNT OF WORK (CONT'D) r9� Tn % flt9 4 %V, (. 08 4-74o or - The 4. tee. nrn3o lcen /[�f u >6'! In z�esc%j ,,, rin/ ed o / ' /4 frn /i. .-a reg. / ✓m l�rn .Inrnhan.a n�7 ,/2r044.m . 4,1e �nc . .t' /e 9e/e .n ri /he- pr fp- --1 171 C n - fed A • ti, YT-AC 7` .so..> <> /. �iirh err 11 'rr f 0 O l /c,, 9 Co / risn��fi 4 % e /y ,o ./rrre .6e.hy se/ er SCALE: " =2 DRAINAGE EASEMENT // / j / / / / • / 7 / POND BOTTOM ELEV.= 2023.63 BERM ELEV.= 2024.83 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 3RD ADDTION DATE: 10/03/95 J Et ); F\t' - \c G µ. l 1t- . SQ � ��el G / \ 7 / ��F 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTILITY ESMT INLAND I ITC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Sulte 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 10' WIDE UTILITY ESMT SCALE: " =20' Lci co laJ 5 CURB INLET TYPE 1� STA =45 INLET TC= 2024.46 POND "Cr LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA 5 TYP DRAINAGE EASEMENT 1 07 . 91. POND BOTTOM ELEV. = 2023.63 BERM ELEV.= 2024.43 r LOT 4, BLOCK 2 RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION DATE: 10/03/95 INLAND siC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844 10' WIDE UTILITY ESMT CURB INLET TYPE 1 STA =45 +50 TC= 2024.46 SCALE: " =20' •O I � a�_ •u / — 1 ...JOG, 26.067' : 1 J •f 5' TYP 1 01 . 97. DRAINAGE EASEMENT POND ° C1 ° LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA 100.3 POND BOTTOM ELEV.= 203.63 BERM ' ELEV.= 2024.43 N LOT 5, BLOCK 2 RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION DATE: 10/03/95 r NC INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 M SCALE: " =20' 0 ° o. CONCRETE INLET TYPE I WITH TYPE 2 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA =44 +65 35' LT GRATE ELEV= 2023.03 5' TYP P i c POND BOTTOM ELEV.= 2022.53 BERM ELEV.= 2023.73 POND "62" LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA 16' WIDE SIDEWALK DRAINAGE EASEMENT / & UTILITY ESMT SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & UD WITH SOLID COVER STA =44 +60 20.5' LT UD ELEV= 2023.78 CURB INLET TYPE 1 & TYPE 2 STA =44 +50 TC= 2023.76 15 LF OF 12" CMP ® 0.15 FT. /FT. IE(N) =2020.53 IE(S) =2018.28 EXPIRES 9/24/ LOT 2, BLOCK 4 RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION DATE: 10/03/95 1 rri INLAND IC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spolwne, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -8844 m SCALE: 1 " =20' 7 5' TYP 12.36' POND "62" LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA DRAINAGE EASEMENT (y/ / CONCRETE INLET TYPE I WITH > TYPE 2 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA =44 +65 35' LT GRATE ELEV= 2023.03 15 LF OF 12" CMP •' \ /y 0 0.15 FT. /FT. .•�B / IE(N)= 2020.53 . X {y• IE(S)= 2018.28 / \ SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & LID \ �$ WITH SOLID COVER STA =44 +60 20.5' LT LID ELEV= 2023.78 CURB INLET TYPE 1 & TYPE 2 STA =44 +50 TC= 2023.76 POND BOTTOM ELEV.= 2022:53 BERM ELEV.= 2023.73 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT LOT 3, BLOCK 4 RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION DATE: 10/03/95 INLAND IC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -8844 CURB INLET TYPE 1 STA =44 +50 TC= 2023.76 �O\ P�. Doti l 5 ' (TYP) POND "02" LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA SCALE: " =20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & GRATE WITH SOLID COVER STA =44 +60 22.5' LT GRATE ELEV= 2023.03 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT POND BOTTOM ELEV.= 2022.53 BERM ELEV.= 2023.73 v LOT 3, BLOCK 2 RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION DATE: 10/03/95 pr INLAND IC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -8844 10' WIDE UTILITY ESMT SCALE: " =20' CURB INLET TYPE 1 STA =44 +50 TC= 2023.76 •.� / < , 90 / / N .• N / ti DRAINAGE EASEMENT 5 (TYP) POND BOTTOM ELEV.= 2022.53 BERM ELEV.= 2023.73 SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE 'B' DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & GRATE WITH SOLID COVER STA =44 +60 22.5' LT GRATE ELEV= 2023.03 POND "C2" LEVEL FIAT BOTTOM AREA LOT 2, BLOCK 2 RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION DATE: 10/03/95 pfic INLAND PACI FIC EN ERINC3 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 TOP OF BERM ELEV.= POND BOTTOM ELEV. + 1.20' DRAINAGE STRUCTURE - WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS 3 MAX. X1 1 NOTES: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN .9' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER UNE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST CURB DROP TO THE POND TYPICAL '208' POND SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) R/ W NORMAL GUTTER LINE 4" THICK P.C.C. GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE TYPE "B" CURB'. /A // CONCRETE APRON 1 208 CROSS SECTION RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION 10/01/95 SCALE: 1" =20' INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844, TOP OF BERM ELEV.= POND BOTTOM ELEV. + 1.20' Je . , h.aII.jk R/W DRAINAGE STRUCTURE — WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS 3 MAX. Q t NOTES: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN .9' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER UNE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST CURB DROP TO THE POND TYPICAL '208' POND SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) 208 CROSS SECTION RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION 10/01/95 SCALE: 1" =20' R/W 4" THICK P.C.C. NORMAL GUTTER LINE GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE ROLLED CURB IEXPIRES 9/24, i r- 707 West 7th • Suite Spokane, WA 99204 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 200 (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., Acting County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director August 30, 1995 Bruce Howard IPEC SUBJECT: P1414A/P1414B - Riverwalk Design Deviation Gentlemen: The Design Deviation Request for a hammerhead turnaround at the easterly terminus of Indiana Avenue has been disapproved; the proposed configuration is not appropriate for vehicles maintaining public roads. A copy is enclosed. If you have any questions, please call me at 456 -3600. Very truly yours, William A. Johns, P. E. Acting Spokane County Engineer Edward J. Parry, Jr., P.E. Plans Review Engineer encls: Design Deviation Request cc: project file reviewer 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 RECEIVED SEP-11995 I.P.E.C. Fs 61 ROAD NAME Indiana Avenue NAME OF PLAT Riverwalk P.U.D. ADDRESS OF BLDG N/A NAME OF BLDG PROJECT N/A FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT* N'/A AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC N/A Current Traffic Count REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION $30.00 EXISTING CONDITIONS: ROAD WIDTH 40' ROAD SURFACE Asphalt JUSTIFICATION: Spokane Valley Fire Department, District #1 has "A" (copy of letter attached as reference),, and County Standards adopted January 1995, and previous SUBMITTED BY Inland Pacific Engineering Company, Inc_ ADDRESS 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200, Spokane,. Washington PHONE## (509) 458 -6840 -REQUESFWRL NOT BI REVIEWED FUNDS - :ASH7C ECK (_'+_ RECEIVED By ntc::3 ; R OMmipalw MM DATE August 3, 1995 CRP/RID # N/A PROJECT LIMITS N/A y- 3( PU1fl -1 -aL Plat # ZE -92 -8I Ph 1414 -b l BLDG# B9 S 8 T25N. R 45E. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: 40' Asphalt N/ Design Year Traffic Count Riverwalk Phase 2 and 3 is a 90 lot PHD with private interior streets PROJECT DESCRIPTION with access to- the project from Indiana Avenue,. a public local access street. Improvements 'include public sever, water, street, and drainage improvements. PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION To construct the temporary turn - around' at the end of Indiana Avenue with.Hammerhead configuration: as shown= on: Attachment "A". approved the configuration as shown on Attachment in accordance with Section 3.22 of Spokane design deviation approved 7/21/95,. that provisions are made for the roads to be open for emergency and-public service vehicle use. An easement will be granted for public and: emergency vehicle use of Snake River Lane as necessary to use the Hammerhead configuration. The public and private street intersection provides more than the required Hammerhead standards as required by Section 10.204 of the 1991 •Dniformr'Fire Coder for- dead end` road over DATE August 3; 1995 ZIP CODE 99204 stabs ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF $30.00 PAID' TO SPOKANE COUNTY sem 1076 W BROADW4Y, SPOKANE WA 99260 0170 - PHO (509)456-3600 FAX (509)324-3478 • DATE. ' C -3 z -Tr SPOKANE COUNTY INTERIM ROAD & DRAINAGE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST LL PROJECT N - 7E- 1 ��-�i DATE: r % �/9S PROJECT NAME. — 0 Vts2.e.aitc,C� i / r/zA/. PROJECT SPONSOR. EO i. ./. PROJECT ENGINEER• n tOttn -Pt_g7 (Road & Drainage Plans) , / PROJECT SURVEYOR as-cita (Plat) TEI a > g(O /— C�LO /� TEL a TEL s PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS. ��/ GENERAL ITEMS v.BN.ON /AD els< signed "AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES" form has been submitted to Spokane County along with any ,/ applicable plat fees, prior to any pre- design/presubmittal meeting Ya C7 N, ❑N /AD # I have a copy of, and have reviewed the tpost recent conditions of approval and any EIS /MDNS requirements and conditions of approval have been incorporated in this plan submittal. �� / ' PROJECT DESIGN re� � I N/A0 have completed a minimum of one pre- design meeting with Spokane County Development Engineering �� Services Engineers where agreement was reached on-drainage design approach. vet tu,DN/AD 1 have included the results of any geotechnical testing that is required by the design approach to verify design �� parameters. � ve0rr.DWAD I have include ti�l�rlequi % i t calculations on new Public roadways as required by the , "SPOKANE CbbUNTY STAND S FOR ROAD AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION ", latest edition. reLJN.Oru4De road and drainage plans comply with the "STANDARD ROAD PLAN" requirements for plan, profile, and typical cross section elements contained in "SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND SEWER / CONSTRUCTION" latest edition except as allowed through approved design deviations. ve�In.ON/AD a drainage report incorporates the minimum requirements for a storm drainage analysis as noted in the GSM and other items which are appropriate td'demonstrate that the design meets all requirements of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management except as allowed through approved design deviations. redN.ON /A D os far - A com Iete drainage basin map with time of concentration paths shown has been included with the detailed hydrology calculations. Drainage basin map shows topograph, proposed drainage features, and correlates with h drology calculations. //• AI v.sK Elu/AD vaD(401:11,4mEl pplicable traffic signing requirements are met and have been incorporated in the plan submittal. I have included copies of all approved DESIGN DEVIATIONS which are required for this project. ynErN.ON/AD 9! The plans and drainage report are stamped, signed, and dated, and contains, the applicable certification III scat e` t. vfKN.DNtAD I have included an adequate erosion control plan and applicable standard plan notes. raErLON/AD I have secured approvals from all applicable outside agencies such as fire districts where applicable and have ,r�// included proof of their approvals.. rfur+.ON/AD D have provided an acceptable means for perpetual maintenance of street and drainage faciliyes that is acceptable � to Spokane County and have secured and included copies of any required easements. i *" /ll}pt,s' r�.t—tN.DruA❑ . I haver viewed the plans, calculations and other submittal data for completeness, accuracy and consistency and have submitted two copies of plans and (1) bound drainage report. I understand that the requirements noted above are the minimum requirements necessary to perform a cursory review of the project plans, and that additional infortation should be included with this submittal as necessary. I understand that this submittal will be checked for completeness prior to review, and that it will be returned for further information if it is found to be incomplete. I understand that this submittal will not be accepted for review (and placed on the review list) until all required information has been submitted. Form completed by the responsible Engineer o�D z CDthPpi is L Company: � �, �, _ . / Address' — 313 - 7" CD. 9Z �tt1 zoo Cinig" a °A2042/ Date. 16 �31gs FOR SPOKANE COUNTY USE ONLY SUBMITTAL: Accepted for review. X Reiurned for submittal of the following: GENERAL ITEM H• PROJECT DESIGN N /724•'91' 1 - ik wk Net Taa6 -1 r 0 W1D' p46 sue" fl At RESUBMITTAL ITEM fi• Date. By I czr95 t Zip code Form returned to 17t1 OW PLC AC- Company Pet Address. j Spokane County PubliciWorIcs Development Services cask au t., is hesol Pea Pt t tc to erictisieees PROJECT N 4 10 3 - 5I PROJECT NAME. — 0 V(S eat - X. - 1217 /41 PROJECT SPONSOR. S� 1N 7T7 /• PROJECT ENGINEER. 7 b 1.-0/J714 -� (Road & Drainage Plans) I / PROJECT SURVEYOR. (Plat) Meal ❑N /A❑ 1. YesECON /A❑ 2. Yep-- /NO ❑N /A❑ 1. YetErn /A❑ YnefCEIN /A❑ 4. YcacroDwA❑ 5. YaRCIO N /A❑ YeKo❑N /A❑ YesECON/A❑ Ye 9. Yey�Ky,� ON/A❑ 10. Yee-+N.DN /A❑ 11. YeK ❑N/A❑ YJ CDN /A❑ l /ckplaty 1.0/May95 SPOKANE COUNTY INTERIM ROAD & DRAINAGE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS. GENERAL ITEMS A signed "AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES" form has been submitted to Spokane County along with any applicable plat fees, prior to any pre design/presubmittal meeting I have a copy of, and have reviewed the most recent conditions of approval and any EIS /MDNS requirements and conditions of approval have been incorporated in this plan submittal. PROJECT DESIGN 1 DATE: 1 /3/95 TEL _Et TEL 4 / - -OS's( TEL N - rtP e' a-/O I have completed a minimum of one pre- design meeting with Spokane County Development Engineering Services Engineers where agreement was reached on drainage design approach. 2. 1 have included the results of any geotechnical testing that is required by the design approach to verify design parameters. 3. I have included any required pavement design calculations on new Public roadways as required by the "SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION ", latest edition. The road and drainage plans comply with the "STANDARD ROAD PLAN" requirements for plan, profile, and typical cross section elements contained in "SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION" latest edition except as allowed through approved design deviations. The drainage report incorporates the minimum requirements for a storm drainage analysis as noted in the GSM and other items which are appropriate td'demonstrate that the design meets all requirements of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management except as allowed through approved design deviations. 6. A complete drainage basin map with time of concentration paths shown has been included with the detailed hydrology calculations. Drainage basin map shows topograph, proposed drainage features, and correlates with hydrology calculations. 7. All applicable traffic signing requirements are met and have been incorporated in the plan submittal. 8. I have included copies of all approved DESIGN DEVIATIONS which are required for this project. The plans and drainage report are stamped, signed, and dated, and contains, the applicable certification statement. I have included an adequate erosion control plan and applicable standard plan notes. I have secured approvals from all applicable outside agencies such as fire districts where applicable and have included proof of their approvals.. 12. I have provided an acceptable means for perpetual maintenance of street and drainage facilities that is acceptable to Spokane County and have secured and included copies of any required easements. ' 13. I have ?viewed the plans, calculations and other submittal data for completeness, accuracy and consistency and have submitted two copies of plans and (1) bound drainage report. I understand that the requirements noted above are the minimum requirements necessary to perform a cursory review of the project pians, and that additional inforpation should be included with this submittal as necessary. I understand that this submittal will be checked for completeness prior to review, and that it will be returned for further information if it is found to be incomplete. I understand that this submittal will not be accepted for review (and placed on the review list) until all required information has been submitted. Form completed by the respon4ble Engineer /ODD R. t `L rfiFvL -ts Company• /�,�,_ • ` Address. CD. _ �a. t.t•r - 2-to i.mJC OA `"r/! / Date- /6 / 9 / q i Zip code FOR SPOKANE COUNTY USE ONLY SUBMITTAL: Accepted for review. X Returned for submittal of the following: GENERAL ITEM N - PROJECT DESIGN N • 7 ' ��it Gtrribt k7 wAS Nei Re nVe4 wait '(lus suit treat RESUBMITTAL ITEM N• Date By Form y Form returned to 1 M Iam0(x • fi c. Company net Address Spokane County Pub • .orks Development Services llckplatvl.0 /May95 cubit Tot !s 1'el1 Gil Pt CAC etAtijeteS anal. 2 October 10, 1995 W.O. #95618 Spokane County Department of Engineers 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 Irr INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Attn: Ed Parry, P.E. RE: Riverwalk 3rd Addition, PE- 1414 -81 Dear Ed: RECEIVED OCT 1 01995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER I would like to resubmit the above referenced plan set. I have addressed you comment concerning the traffic and signing plan, we have enclosed a separate document to address this issue. I have met with a representative from the Traffic Department, this plan set meets their requirements. Please consider this signing and traffic control plan is not on the Submittal Checklist. Item #7 reads "all applicable traffic and signing requirements are met and have been incorporated in the plan submittal." These items were on the plans set when you returned them to us. Therefore I would like for you to consider the original submittal date as the time the 30 working days for review w uld start. / if d — ea% 47 // & , r 1 �sT rw "I If I can help in any way, or there is information you need from us , please contact me as soon as possible. Sincerely, INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY — gees . Bruce A. Howard E.I.T. BAH:wp cc: file IY 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 509- 458 -6840 FAX: 509- 458 -6844 Ye/ - iNo N /A channel No N/A 0 N /A Yee 1f No ' N/A 1 Yee No ❑ NIA ❑ Yee'/ - 'No ❑ N/A El Yee LI N /A Yes No CI N/A Yea ❑ No ❑ N/A Yee ❑ No ❑ N/A Yee ❑ No ❑ N/A Yea No ❑ N/A Yee ❑ No ❑ N/A Yee � No 0 N/A 0 V3 PC El N/A Yee 0 No �N/A Ye C ounty preeubvl /October 95 f. Time of concentration path is clearly indicated, and the sheet flow, shallow concentrated flow, and flow components are clearly noted 2. Bound report includes: a. Hydrology calculations which include (1) the time of concentration (2) flow path, with elevations, length, and slope (3) surface cover description b. Soils map clearly showing the project limits and soils types c. Inlet capacity calculations d. Culvert capacity and velocity calculations `e. Pipe conveyance capacity and velocity calculations f. Ditch capacity and velocity calculations g. Culvert backwater calculations h. Pipe backwater calculations I. Ditch backwater calculations �/ j. Bowstring calculations for 208 swale designs (required and provided volumes) {"'Tr1 k. 208 swale sizing calculations (required and provided areas and volumes) 1. Detention /retention storage capacity calculations (required and provided volumes; allowable and actual outflow rates) 3. Includes the information required for construction plans as described in Section 2.3 of the Spokane Stommwater Management Guidelines 4. 208 Lot Plans have been included 5. Easement documents have been prepared, signed by all parties, and recorded 19 Jeigtaa_ eizaa / cirdafrut ,a& Whet— c°it.t."A4 * pat r peeos To ser sadist atop_ etev a Tic t 0.2 3 c2 DATE: October 27, 1995 �A ,' f PROJECT: it V 4 o!J County Project #: ��10 Revi #: l PROJECT SPONSOR: 1. 11J cam / TEL# PROJECT ENGINEER (Road & Drainage Plans /1 :10 0)Lt TEL# PROJECT SURVEYOR (Plat) � TEL# Yes No N/A Yes 111 No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A El Ves No' N/A yes No ❑ N/A CI Ves 0 No NIA El Yes ❑ No N/A Yes ❑ No NIA LI Yes Nn N/A ❑ Yes < ❑ N/A Yes n No N/A ❑ veQrvo 0 N/A Yes NO LI N/r° yes No N/A 1'ea No N/A Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A vea No N/A Yes No N/A Ves No ❑ NIA Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A PRESUBMITTAL CHECKLIST SPECIFIC MINIMUM ITEMS FOR PLAN ACCEPTANCE ROAD PLAN SUBMITTAL 1. The Review Fee Account is current 2. The plans are legible 3. All lettering is a readable size • 4. The plans have been stamped, signed and dated by a Washington State - licensed Professional Engineer 5. The plans contain the engineer's certification and approval for construction 6. The plans have been signed by the developer 7. All necessary Design Deviation Requests have been approved by the County Engineer 8. Includes a drawing title block and sheet number in the lower right hand corner. The title block contains: Project name, Project number, Sheet number, Street name or type of details, Work limits stationing 9. Includes both horizontal and vertical engineering scales 10. Includes a north arrow 11. Includes a benchmark 12. Road layout matches the proposed plat layout. / s t a tes/ 13. Street naes are designated on the plans.$QQI fi 7t 1 1 A F � � S � e t names 14. Horizontal curve radii meet minimums for road classification IIME IN 15. Includes road alignments with a. 100' CL stationing, reading from left to right, south to north b. Stationing at points of horizontal curve and tangent c. Stationing equations at road intersections 16. Bearings on the road centerlines, keyed to the associated plat map are shown. 17. Includes curve data on all horizontal curves (radius, delta, arc length, tangent length) 8. Includes curve data on all vertical curves (entering grade slope, PVC station & elevation, PVI station & elevation, PVT station & elevation, curve length, exiting grade slope) 19. Shows the right -of -way lines and width for all proposed roads and intersecting roads, together with existing road improvement dimensions. ve, ❑ No NIA 20. Shows all topographic features within the right -of -way limits or future right -of -way limits, and sufficient area beyond to resolve questions of setback, slope, drainage, access onto abutting property, and road continuations (25' min.) Yes ' No ° NIA LI Yes 0 No ° N /A Yes ° No ° N/A 0 Yes/ No ° N/A ° Yes 0 No❑ NIA ° Yes No NIA El Yes ° No ❑ N/A ° Yes ° No ❑ N/A Yea No /A Yes No N /A Yes ❑ No0N /A'1 Yes No ° NIA Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Yea ° No ° N/A Yes ° No 0 N/A Ves❑ No N /A Yes No° N /A Yes Q No ❑ N/A ° Ves No NIA Yes vco0 NIA ° Yes7No N /A YeeZ No ❑ N/A ❑ Yes 0 N/A 0 Yes No ° N/A preoubvl /October 95 21. Utilities: a. Shows all existing and proposed utilities; OR b. Provided an infomnation copy of the utility plans 22. Includes cross - sections of: a. All proposed widenings of existing roads b. Proposed new roads c. Street sections match the Conditions of Approval 23. Includes curb grade worksheets for all roads being widened 24. Includes a designation of the road construction start and project stop stations 25. Includes section lines and lot lines of all lots within the proposed subdivision or short plat 26. Shows the profiles for the left curbline (top of curb), centerline, and right curbline (top of curb) 27. Shows the beginning, middle, and end of curb return elevations on the plats and profiles 28. Shows the beginning and end of curb return stations on the plans and profiles 29. Shows all plan elements as defined in the Spokane County Road Standards (latest edition) 30. Shows all profile elements as defined in the Spokane County Road Standards (latest edition) 31. Intersection sight distance analysis submitted for: a. All roads connecting to County roads b. All interior roads: (1) which have sight triangles which cross private property (2) where sight is obscured by the existing topography 32. Shows all other data necessary for this project 33. Signage Plan provided 34. Erosion Control Plan Provided DRAINAGE REPORT 1. Includes topographic information on a map which clearly defines: a. The proposed development b. All existing drainage courses upstream, through, and downstream of the development c. All existing improved and unimproved areas upstream, on, and downstream of the development d. All proposed drainage courses upstream, through, and downstream of the development e. All proposed improved and unimproved areas upstream, on, and downstream of the development 2 PROJECT NAME: t!n lam /477%7r 774o1- PROJECT SPONSOR: PROJECT ENGINEER - (Road & Drainage Plans) PROJECT SURVEYOR• (Plat) yeKE N/AD 7 Ya�e�—r/nuA❑ 8 YaaCDN/A❑ 9 Yalem•❑N/ACI YaDW ❑N/A❑ SPOKANE COUNTY INTERIM ROAD & DRAINAGE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST P . f h ,il tif7tPt_rr? PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS. GENERAL ITEMS A signed "AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES" form has been submitted to Spokane County along with any applicable plat fees, prior to any pre- design/presubmittal meeting 2• I have a copy of, and have reviewed the nlost recent conditions of approval and any EIS /MDNS requirements and conditions of approval have been incorporated in this plan submittal. PROJECT DESIGN DATE: ` ✓/ 5�9� TEL u -`r'7 /l G)(4)r° TEL u trig -e.0/3cItO TEL k ` —t cjrlc) • I have completed a minimum of one pre- design meeting with Spokane County Development Engineering Services Engineers where agreement was reached on drainage design approach. 2. I have included the results of any geotechnical testing that is required by the design approach to verify design parameters. 3. 1 have included any required pavement design calculations on new Public roadways as required by the "SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION ", latest edition. 4. The road and drainage plans comply with the "STANDARD ROAD PLAN" requirements for plan, profile, and typical cross section elements contained in "SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION" latest edition except as allowed through approved design deviations. 5. The drainage report incorporates the minimum requirements for a storm drainage analysis as noted in the GSM and other items which are appropriate t8'demonstrate that the design meets all requirements of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management except as allowed through approved design deviations. A comp drainage basin map with time of concentration paths shown has been included with the detailed hydrology calculations. Drainage basin map shows topograph, proposed drainage features, and correlates with hydrology calculations. • All applicable traffic signing requirements are met and have been incorporated in the plan submittal. • I have included copies of all approved DESIGN DEVIATIONS which are required for this project. • The plans and drainage report are stamped, signed, and dated, and contains, the applicable certification statement. 0. 1 have included an adequate erosion control plan and applicable standard plan notes. 1. I have secured approvals from all applicable outside agencies such as fire districts where applicable and have included proof of their approvals.. 2. I have provided an acceptable means for perpetual maintenance of street and drainage facilities that is acceptable to Spokane County and have secured and included copies of any required easements. . 3. I have r viewed the plans, calculations and other submittal data for completeness, accuracy and consistency and have submitted two copies of plans and (1) bound drainage report. - VelPtuv1.0/May9s 1 • • I uni.4rstand that the requirements noted above are the minimum requirements necessary to perform a cursory review of the project plans, and that additional information should be included with this submittal as necessary. understand that this submittal will be checked for completeness prior to review, and that it will be returned for further information if it is found to be incomplete. I understand that this submittaTl will not be accepted for review (and placed on the review list) until all required information has been submitted. • Form completed by the respon4ble Engineer Company: -i Address• c/ l Cure: 2n0 1 �i4r /2o`f Date- /6/9//< SUBMITTAL: GENERAL ITEM # - PROJECT DESIGN N • RESUBMITTAL ITEM #. Form returned to Company Address. Date. By Spokane County Public Works Development Services I/ckptatv1.0 /May95 PD R1 Ca FOR SPOKANE COUNTY USE ONLY Accepted for review. Returned for submittal of the following: Zip code afet t STOP st6A5 WNO% ufrtg 61 keys)) ckVJ.4.rt' coal rat i...., u ►s Mel S.vc .a. rlce Sr cewira.c 3 trc.JT c s: Lalc J/HQK t..c.r -.ay. gacjs AR.c 14:+4X. C-1VAC Co. F..+r 2 STANTON SPOKANE L P. For 9 -6 -95 Spokane County Engineer Plat Check Fee Division 3 RECEIPT ate Received From A ess ler �Q o AMT. OF ACCOUNT MAT. PAID BALANCE DUE BKBOB REDIFORM ACCOONT DATE INVOICE NO. DESCRIPTION. HOW PAID CASH CHECK MONEY ORDER PLEASE DETACH THIS PORTION AND RETAIN FOR YOUR RECORDS 0* 000 L 1:125000 S741: 226 9355 5" a 19 Dollars $ / °' ° � 12F -7 4 001 BALANCE • STANTON SPOKANE L. P. 16720 NE 116TH ST. (206) 869 -6618 REDMOND, WA 98052 PAY: *** *;One Hundred. Dollars and ,PAY ro THE-1 ... Spokane ' County Engineer -• ORDER OF KEY BANK OF WASHINGTON Bellevue on Fourth 10655 NE. 4th St. Bellevue, WA 98004 DATE. 9 -6 -95 CHECK NO. 1428 19- 57/1250 AMOUNT $100.00 001428 September 21, 1995 Mr. Dave Berto Spokane County Engineer's Office North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Dave: RE: RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION PE- 1414 -81 Sincerely, INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Enclosed please find two copies of the draft final plat referenced above. Please review for final approval. The enclosed check for $100 is the plat check fee. Enclosed also is a copy of the plat certificate. There has already been submitted a signed Fee Agreement. Please call if you have any questions. Thank you. INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. r ouw t ifi tuj r i\ GuPa P � 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 509- 458 -6840 FAX: 509- 458 -6844 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING = TRANSMITTAL 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -6844 TO: ' Poe. -41,1g Co. 0isivaL1= ' ATTENTION[-t-"- L- ki*441 O ED Rra� -t-r. Description FR"ftfueline Prints fl Copy of Letter Original Drawing o Contract Documents 0 fl Work Authorization CI Report No. Copies Descripti 0.zi'sr nr 0'N ger (Pa rcebk.4e -,-} Purpose Information Review & Comments Per Your Request Q Written Approval O Signature & Return Remarks fiv - - F x - Ya fe- g z ce , J i>rt✓7C s>AIGtnscf ,4- 7z,, aC 7 •f,4 r 771 .fljv e Flar-a) PST A/C ea47 , s7 Signed 14/4 l RECEIVED OCT 1 3 1995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Addendum to ATTACHMENT "A" DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF WORK Riverwalk Phase 2 (52 Lots) (Now referred to as Riverwalk 3rd Addition Consisting of 12 lots) The following services are hereby- added to the WORK AUTHORIZATION for Riverwalk ?mod Addition, Special Services Section B: 1. The minimum scope of these construction engineering services includes, but is not limited to: A) Periodic observation and reporting of construction activities on this project; B) Maintenance of all construction records related to this project, to include, but not be limited to daily inspection reports, manufacturer's certifications, material test reports, and correspondence; C) Assurance that the construction of the roads and appurtenant drainage facilities is according to the certified and approved plans accepted by the Spokane County Engineer, Spokane County General Provisions, the Standard Specifications, and applicable portions of the WSDOT Construction Manual; D) Staking and Monumentation as outlined under Basic Services; E) Development of Record Drawings; and F) Coordination of the testing of construction materials for compliance to the plans accepted by the Spokane County Engineer, Spokane County General Provisions, the Standard Specifications, and applicable portions of the WSDOT Construction Manual. Actual materials testing to be performed by others and billed separate from Inland Pacific Engineering billing. 2. Prior to acceptance of the roads and drainage facilities by Spokane County, the Engineer shall submit all construction records and the Record Drawing to the Spokane County Engineer. The services described herein will be performed as needed and billed on the basis of time and expense as outlined in Attachment "D ". You should budget $3,600.00. Accepted: Inland Pacific Engineering Accepted t.nt D evelopment Title Pk by: I I l ai.l� — Title date: 0 � MC date: O ' 3 • '9 vtorr-tIn DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer October 11, 1996 Ed Dean Mark Hancock Dean Housley Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, WA 98052 Gentlemen: Sincerely, , Willla Jo Spokane County Engineer • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Addition P1414A - Riverwalk P.U.D. 2nd Addition P1414B - Riverwalk P.U.D. 3rd Addition Submittal of Construction Documentation and Record Drawings We have had several discussions with you and your engineer (Inland Pacific Engineering) over the past 6 months regarding the expected submittal of the Record Drawings and Construction Documentation for these projects. As you will recall, the County's original position was that the Plats of 2nd and 3rd Additions would not receive Final Approval until all the work for Indiana Avenue was completed by your contractor, certified by your engineer. and accepted by the County Engineer's Office. This resulted from your failure to secure a permit for the work in the right of way for Indiana Avenue prior to starring construction. I am concerned that you will be submitting these documents at a point in time when the weather will not allow (a) a proper Final Inspection to take place. and /or (b) corrective action to be properly made on items of deficient work. I need to see a submittal of all the construction documentation, to include certified Record Drawings, no later than 12:00 noon. October 31, 1996. This submittal will need to comply with the requirements of Section 9 of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, as well as the guidance I have provided to your engineer in my earlier discussions and correspondence with them If this does not occur, I will be forced to take further actions as are necessary to ensure that this material is submitted in a timely fashion; these actions may include revocation of approach permits, restriction of lot building permits, et al.,. If you have any further questions or comments, please contact me at 456 -3600. Thank you. cc: project rile Spokane County Public Works Director: Dennis Scott. P.E. Spokane County Engineer's Office: Bill Hemmings. P.E., Ed Parry, P.E. Spolcs0116Q11i8108 1ter's (e RCWBSge0 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 Prepared By: Inland Pacific Engineering 707 West 7 Suite 200 Spokane WA 99204 (509) - 458-6840 STORM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS for RIVERWALK THIRD ADDITION October 1, 1995 DRAINAGE REPORT for RIVERWALK THIRD ADDITION OCTOBER 1, 1995 Prepared by: Inland Pacific Engineering Company 707 West 7th Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 This report has been prepared by the staff of Inland Pacific Engineering Company under the direction of the undersigned professional engineer whose seal and signature appear hereon. This report conforms to the applicable editions of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction and the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management. Todd R. Whipple, P.E. PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to determine the extent of storm drainage facilities which will be required to dispose of stormwater runoff created by the development of Riverwalk Third Addition. The storm drainage facilities on this project will be designed to dispose of stormwater runoff for varied storm events as required by Spokane County and The Guidelines for Stormwater Mana eg ment This development is within the Aquifer Sensitive Area and is subject to '208' requirements. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The Rational Method, which is recommended for basins less than ten acres in size, will be used to determine the peak discharges and runoff volumes for the ten year storm event. For basin areas larger than 10 acres in size, or offsite basins the Soil Conservation Service, TR -55 Method for runoff and retention storage volume will be used. The drainage analysis for this project will follow the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Riverwalk Third Addition is a 2.58 acre, 12 lot subdivision. Riverwalk Third Addition (A Planned Unit Development) is located in the S 1/2 of the SW 1/4 and Government Lots 5 and 6 of Section 8, T. 25 N., R. 45 EWM. Sheet 67 of the Soil Survey of Spokane County. Washington. (copy attached) shows the soil types to be GgA, Garrison gravelly loam, 0 to 5% sideslopes, gravelly medium textured, somewhat excessively drained soil. The permeability of this soil is moderate to the substratum and very rapid through it. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion is slight to moderate. This soil is well suited for homesite development. The main limitation for septic tank absorption fields is very rapid permeability in the substratum. The contamination of ground water supplies as a result of seepage is a possibility. Developed Condition In the developed condition, the project can be divided into 3 basins, A through C, by the crowns and high points of the various road improvements. (See Basin Map, copy attached.) Inland Pacific Engineering Inc. Rivenvalk 3rd Addition - Drainage 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Basin Descriptions Basins A through C will be designed to dispose of stormwater created by the 10 -year event. The stormwater created by this event will be disposed of in roadside swales and Spokane County Standard drywells. Basin A consists of the both proposed and future road impervious areas on the south side of Salmon River Lane from approximate station 39 +04 to 43 +04, and the entrance road Salmon River Lane. This basin also includes lot 1, block 1, and 5 future lots. Basin B consists of proposed and future impervious area on the north side of Salmon River Lane from station 39 +04 to the intersection of Platte River Lane and Salmon River Lane. It also includes the front half of lots 1 - 4, block 4, and lot 1, block 3, as well as 6 future lots. Basin C consists of the road impervious area on the south half of Salmon River Lane, from station 43 +04 to the high point at station 48 +00. This road impervious area includes approximately 150 feet of roadway not included in this plat. This basin also includes lots 1 - 6, block 1, and two additional lots proposed as part of Riverwalk, Phase 5. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS - ONSITE The stormwater from the 3 onsite basins will be disposed of in '208' retention ponds, and Spokane County drywells as shown on the plans and in the attached Bowstring Calculation Sheets. Table 1 lists the total, and impervious areas for the Time of Concentration and Peak Flow calculations. Table 2 summarizes the retention volumes required for each basin as calculated by the Bowstring Calculations, as well as the depth, perimeter, area and volume provided for each pond. Inland Pacific Engineering Inc. Rivenvatk 3rd Addition - Drainage 2 TOTAL AREA IMPERVIOUS AREA Basin Sq. Ft. Acres Road Sq.Ft. Acres # Lots DU /GA "C" A 58,582 1.34 -- 10,878 0.25 6 4.48 0.40 B 59,577 1.38 14,640 0.34 5.75 4.17 0.40 C 71,154 1.63 12,900 0.30 8 4.91 0.40 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CALCULATIONS The total and impervious basin areas used to calculate the Time of Concentration and Peak Flows for each basin in Riverwalk Third Addition as shown on the pages following, are tabulated below. (See calculation sheets, copy attached.) TABLE 1 - Tc AND PEAK FLOW CALCULATIONS Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. Rivenvalk 3rd Addition - Drainage 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '208' RETENTION VOLUME CALCULATIONS '208' retention volumes were calculated using the following formula: Volume (cu. ft.) = (depth)(area) + (slope area)(perimeter) TABLE 2 -'208' RETENTION POND VOLUME CALCULATIONS Note: Typical sideslopes are 3:1 maximum. Ponds Al, Bl, and Cl are intermediate '208' ponds designed to handle the upstream impervious area only. Pond Al will be built as part of a future phase, but needed to be designed as part of this project. Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. Rivenvalk 3rd Addition - Drainage 4 Riverwalk Third Addition POND DEPTH AREA PERIMETER REQ'D VOL. VOL. PROV. Al 0.5 — . 300 70 175 176.3 A2 0.5 490 98 278.3 281.8 B1 0.5 525 100 291.7 300 B2 0.5 573.8 108 318.3 327.4 Cl 0.5 333.6 73.7 182.3 194.5 C2 0.5 639.2 105.3 355.2 359 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '208' RETENTION VOLUME CALCULATIONS '208' retention volumes were calculated using the following formula: Volume (cu. ft.) = (depth)(area) + (slope area)(perimeter) TABLE 2 -'208' RETENTION POND VOLUME CALCULATIONS Note: Typical sideslopes are 3:1 maximum. Ponds Al, Bl, and Cl are intermediate '208' ponds designed to handle the upstream impervious area only. Pond Al will be built as part of a future phase, but needed to be designed as part of this project. Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. Rivenvalk 3rd Addition - Drainage 4 STORMWATER DISPOSAL AND BASIN SUMMARY The Peak Flow, and Bowstring calculations on the following pages show the required retention volumes for each basin or sub - basin. Listed below are the basin summaries and retention volumes provided. BASIN A The peak flow for the 10 -year design storm from Basin "A" of 0.1.19 c.f.s., will be disposed of in Ponds Al and A2 which have a combined '208' volume of 458.1 cubic feet, and one Type "B" drywell in sump condition. BASIN B The peak flow for the 10 -year design storm from Basin "B" of 1.31 c.f.s., will be disposed of in Ponds B1 and B2 which have a combined '208' volume of 627.4 cubic feet, and one Type "B" drywell in sump condition. BASIN C The peak flow for the 10 -year design storm from Basin "C" of 1.76 c.f.s., will be disposed of in the combination of Ponds Cl and C2 which have a '208' volume of 553.5 cubic feet, and one Type "B" drywell in sump condition. CURB INLETS AND GRATE CALCULATIONS It is necessary to check the adequacy of curb inlets and grate inlets provided to divert the flows from the gutter to the retention ponds. The Curb Drop Calculation Sheet included in this report shows the required lengths of curb openings. As shown on the calculation sheet, various ponds have different curb inlet requirements. Therefore, the required curb openings have been provided according to the tabulated results. All curb drop inlets shall be standard 4' openings, unless otherwise noted. The capacity of grate inlets in sump condition also needs to be checked as outlined in Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management, Section 4 -1.1 Sump Condition. For depths of up to .4 ft. use the weir formula: Q = C * P * H312 P= Perimeter', H= 0.40', and C= 3.0 Q = (3.0)(6.42')(0.253) Q = 4.87 cfs, for Spokane Co. Std. Type 2 Metal Frame and Grate with hood. Therefore, as long as the impervious area design peak flow to be disposed of in a sump condition less than 4.87 c.f.s., a Type 2 grate is adequate. It is also necessary to check the capacity of grate inlets on continuous grade. The Grate Calculation - Continuous Grade worksheets have been included. The calculations have been completed in accordance with Figure 15 of Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management, (See calculation sheets, copy attached.) Inland Pacific Engineering Inc. Rive,walk 3rd Addition - Drainage 5 APPENDIX Peak Flow and Bowstring 7 - 12 Curb inlet calculations 13 - 14 Basin Map 15 Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. Rivenvalk 3rd Addition - Drainage 6 PEAK FLOW AND BOWSTRING 1 1 1 1 1 1 380 ft. Gutter flow 1 1 1 1 CASE 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PEAK FLOW CALCULATION 10 —YEAR STORM INTERVAL Tot. Area 1.34 Acres Imp. Area 10878 SF C = 0.40 CASE 1 120 ft. Overland Flow Ct = L= n= S = 0.15 120 ft. 0.40 0.010 PROJECT: Riverwalk 3rd Addition BASIN: A Tc = 6.09 min., by Equation 3 -2 of Guidelines Z1 = Z2 = n= S= 50.0 3.50 0.016 0.0080 d= 0.167 ft. A R Q Tc Tc total 1 Qc 0.75 0.08 1.19 3.98 10.07 2.22 1.19 Qpeak for Case 1 = 1.19 cfs Case 2 assumes a Time of Concentration less than 5 minutes so that the peak flow = .90(3.18)(Imp. Area) = 0.71 cfs So, the Peak flow for the Basin is the greater of the two flows, 1.19 cfs ' BOWSTRING METHOD DETENTION BASIN DESIGN ' 10 —YEAR DESIGN STORM Time Increment (min) Time of Conc. (min) Outflow (cfs) Design Year Flow Area (acres) Impervious Area (sq ft) 'C' Factor '208' Volume Provided Area * C Time Time Inc. (min) (sec) 10.07 604 5 300 10 600 15 900 20 1200 25 1500 30 1800 35 2100 40 2400 45 2700 50 3000 Intens. Q Devel. (in /hr) (cfs) 3.18 2.24 1.77 1.45 1.21 1.04 0.91 0.82 0.74 0.68 5 10.07 1 10 1.34 10878 0.4 y7a 0.536 1.70 1.20 0.95 0.78 0.65 0.56 0.49 0.44 0.40 0.36 208' DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Required '208' Storage Volume = Impervious Area x .5 in / 12 in /ft 208' Storage Volume Provided Number and Type of Drywells Required PROJECT: BASIN: DESIGNER: DATE: 2.22 1.19 965 Vol.ln Vol.Out Storage (cu ft) (cu ft) (cu ft) 685 965 1049 1092 1106 1118 1125 1145 1152 1168 DRYWELL REQUIREMENT — 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM Maximum Storage Required by Bowstring Riverwalk 3rd Addition A B. Howard 09/30 604 360 300 385 < = = 600 365 900 149 1200 —108 1500 —394 1800 —682 2100 —975 2400 —1255 2700 —1548 3000 —1832 453.3 cu ft LIGE I cu ft 385 cu ft 0 Single 1 Double PEAK FLOW CALCULATION 10 —YEAR STORM INTERVAL Tot. Area 1.38 Acres Imp. Area 14640 SF C = 0.40 CASE 1 50 ft. Overland Flow Ct = L= n= S = 530 ft. Gutter flow Z1 = Z2 = n= S= 0.15 50 ft. 0.40 0.010 PROJECT: Riverwalk 3rd Addition BASIN: B Tc = 3.60 min., byEquation 3 -2 of Guidelines 50.0 3.50 0.016 0.0080 d= 0.173 ft. A R Q Tc Tc total 1 Qc 0.80 0.09 1.31 5.42 9.03 2.37 1.31 ()peak for Case 1 = 1.31 cfs CASE 2 Case 2 assumes a Time of Concentration less than 5 minutes so that the peak flow = .90(3.18)(Imp. Area) = 0.96 cfs So, the Peak flow for the Basin is the greater of the two flows, 1.31 cfs 9 BOWSTRING METHOD DETENTION BASIN DESIGN 10 —YEAR DESIGN STORM Time Increment (min) Time of Conc. (min) Outflow (cfs) Design Year Flow Area (acres) Impervious Area (sq ft) 'C' Factor '208' Volume Provided Area * C Time Time Inc. (min) (sec) 9.03 542 5 300 10 600 15 900 20 1200 25 1500 30 1800 35 2100 40 2400 45 2700 50 3000 5 9.03 1 10 1.38 14640 0.4 ‘,z7. 0.552 Intens. Q Devel. (in /hr) (cfs) 3.18 2.24 1.77 1.45 1.21 1.04 0.91 0.82 0.74 0.68 208' DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Required '208' Storage Volume = Impervious Area x .5 in / 12 in /ft 2.37 1.31 948 1.76 1.24 0.98 0.80 0.67 0.57 0.50 0.45 0.41 0.38 208' Storage Volume Provided PROJECT: BASIN: DESIGNER: DATE: 706 970 1059 1108 1125 1139 1147 1170 1178 1195 DRYWELL REQUIREMENT — 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM Maximum Storage Required by Bowstring Number and Type of Drywelis Required ID Riverwalk 3rd Addition B B. Howard 09/30 VoI.In Vol.Out Storage (cu ft) (cu ft) (cu ft) 542 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 3000 406 370 159 —92 — 375 — 661 — 953 — 1230 — 1 c 2 2 — 1805 610.0 cu ft Lcz cu ft 406 cu ft 0 Single 1 Double 406 <== 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' CASE 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PEAK FLOW CALCULATION 10 —YEAR STORM INTERVAL Tot. Area 1.63 Acres Imp. Area 12900 SF C = 0.40 CASE 1 50 ft. Overland Flow Ct = L= n= S = Tc = 3.60 min., by Equation 3 -2 of Guidelines 345 ft. Gutter flow Z1 = Z2 = n= S= 0.15 50 ft. 0.40 0.010 50.0 3.50 0.016 0.0080 d= 0.194 ft. A R Q Tc Tc total 1 Qc 1.00 0.10 1.76 3.28 6.88 2.70 1.76 Qpeak for Case 1 = 1.76 cfs PROJECT: Riverwalk 3rd Addition BASIN: C Case 2 assumes a Time of Concentration less than 5 minutes so that the peak flow = .90(3.18)(Imp. Area) = 0.85 cfs So, the Peak flow for the Basin is the greater of the two flows, 1.76 cfs 81 BOWSTRING METHOD DETENTION BASIN DESIGN 10 -YEAR DESIGN STORM Time Increment (min) Time of Conc. (min) Outflow (cfs) Design Year Flow Area (acres) Impervious Area (sq ft) 'C' Factor '208' Volume Provided Area * C Time Time Inc. (min) (sec) 6.88 413 5 300 10 600 15 900 20 1200 25 1500 30 1800 35 2100 40 2400 45 2700 50 3000 Intens. (in /hr) 3.18 2.24 1.77 1.45 1.21 1.04 0.91 0.82 0.74 0.68 5 6.88 1 10 1.63 12900 0.4 6' 4 0.652 Number and Type of Drywells Required 2.07 1.46 1.15 0.95 0.79 0.68 0.59 0.53 0.48 0.44 208' DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Required '208' Storage Volume = Impervious Area x .5 in / 12 in /ft 208' Storage Volume Provided PROJECT: BASIN: DESIGNER: DATE: Q Devel. Vol.in Vol.Out Storage (cfs) (cu ft) (cu ft) (cu ft) 2.70 1.76 975 833 1081 1201 1267 1294 1316 1329 1358 1370 1392 DRYWELL REQUIREMENT - 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM Maximum Storage Required by Bowstring Riverwalk 3rd Addition C B. Howard 09/30 413 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 3000 537.5 cu ft 54 ft 562 cu ft 0 Single 1 Double 562 <__ 533 481 301 67 - 206 - 484 - 771 -1042 - 1330 - 1608 CURB INLET CALCULATIONS NM -- MN MTh h h_— MN — 01 MI _ M M 10 —YEAR DESIGN STORM RETENTION POND CALCULATIONS Project: Riverwalk 2nd Addition Date: 02— Oct -95 Designer: B. Howard Upstream Carryover Accumul. Pond '208' '208' Curb Drop !riper. Storage Storage Storage Type/ Storage Carryover Sub —Basin Station R/L Area Req't Req't Req't Size Provided Downstream Al 40 +44 R 4200 175.0 175.0 20x15 176.3 A2 31+39 L 6678 278.3 278.3 ' 14x35 281.8 B1 43 +00 L 7000 291.7 291.7 15x35 300.0 B2 44 +50 L 7640 318.3 318.3 Odd 327.4 01 45 +50 R 4375 182.3 182.3 Odd 194.5 C2 44 +50 R 8525 355.2 355.2 Odd 359 * Calculated per Figure 18 of Guidelines ** Calculated per Figure 16 of Guidelines ***A 4 foot curb drop with a 6" gutter has a capacity of 4.0 cfs in sump condition MIIMIEM - _ - M - M M CURB DROP CALCULATIONS Curb Drop Depression = 2In. Standard Curb Drop Length = 4 ft. Upstream 10 —Yr. Gutter Roughness Reciprocal Depth Length Curb Drop Impervlous Peak Flow Slope Coeff. Cross slope of Flow Required Sub —Basin Station RiL Area c.f.s. S n Z Z/n d • QaiLa•* Q /(Qa&a) Remarks - - - -° °` - - -- _ - -° _ _ -- -- Al 40 +44 R 4200 0.28 0.0080 0.0160 50 3125 0.09 0.064 4.31 Need 5' curb inlet A2 41 +44L 6678 0.91 4' Sump condition B1 43 +00 L 7000 0.46 0.0080 0.0160 60 3125 0.11 0.078 5.93 Need 2 curb drops B2 44+50L 7640 0.85 4' Sump condition C1 45 +50 R 4375 0.29 0.0080 0.0160 50 3125 0.09 0.065 4.42 Need 5' curb inlet C2 44 +60 R 8525 1.47 4' Sump condition Calculated per Figure 18 of Guidelines •* Calculated per Figure 16 of Guidelines ***A 4 foot curb drop with a C' gutter has a capacity of 4.0 cfs In sump condition. SOIL MAP t ve.erm,::9, • • , . • : — SHLL 1 NUMBER 67 1 Mile 0 Scale 1 20 000 L 5000 r (Joins sheet 58) Joins sheet 76) • c la NOTES 10' 6' 2' 15.5' PAVED WIDTH SIDEWALK (ONE SIDE ONLY) 2" CLASS B' ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7' CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. BORDER, SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS 17.5' - t8• PAVED WIDTH VARIES 35' ROAD EASEMENT SPO. CO. STD. TYPE B CURB do GUTTER TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION SALMON RIVER LANE N.T.S. 1) ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE "SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION 1995 ", AND AS AMENDED. 2) LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN IN THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES. ANY CONFUCTING UTILITIES SHALL BE RELOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES. . THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A COMPLETE SET OF THE APPROVED ROAD AND DRAINAGE PLANS ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 50' ROAD EASEMENT IF THE CONTRACTOR DISCOVERS ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE PLANS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF DRYWELLS, INSTALL FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) BETWEEN THE DRYWELL BARREL AND THE WASHED . DRAINROCK, AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAINROCK AND THE NATIVE SOILS. PRIOR TO SITE CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. CALL THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATION SERVICE AT 456 -8000 BEFORE YOU DIG. 10' ISLAND 5' 5' 2" CLASS B" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE AN EFFORT TO PROTECT ALL CATCH BASINS AND DRYWELLS FROM BEING CONTAMINATED WITH SILT BY INSTALLING FILTER FABRIC OVER THE METAL FRAME DURING THE INSTALLATION AND KEEPING IT IN PLACE UNTIL THE STREETS HAVE BEEN PAVED AND CLEANED. THE STREET FRONTAGE OF ALL LOTS SHALL BE GRADED WITH A TEMPORARY CUTOFF SWALE AS SHOWN ON THIS PAGE. ALL DRYWELL CONNECTION PIPES SHALL BE PLACED BELOW THE DRYWELL CONCRETE CAP AND SHALL FLOW AS DIRECTED IN THE PLANS. SEE SHEET 4AR FOR SALMON RIVER 10) FOR ANY CURB GRADES LESS THAN 0.8% (0.0080FT. /FT.), A WASHINGTON STATE — UCENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE CURB FORMS ARE AT THE GRADES NOTED ON THE APPROVED PLANS, PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF CURB MATERIAL. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING AND COORDINATING WORK WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR. 15.5' PAVED WIDTH 0.0200 FT. /FT. VARIES - :6280- FT./FT. SPOKANE COUNTY ROLLED CURB — 1 - 8' PAVED WIDTH --SPO. CO. STD. TYPE B CURB TYPE "R" CURB e ' GUTTER (ROLLED CURB) BACK OF TYPE "B" CURB, .ROLLED CURB OR SIDEWALK ON PLANS ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS UTILITY EASEMENT 10' BORDER & UTILITY EASEMENT RECORD DRAWING NOTES RECORD DRAWING 1 OR MY AGENT HAVE PERIODICALLY REVIEWED THE CONSTRUCTION AND TO MY KNOWLEDGE FIND IT TO BE IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED CERTIFIED PLANS AND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS NOTED TYPICAL TEMPORARY CUTOFF SWALE NOT CONSTRUCTED DUE TO IMMEDIATE HOUSE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND /OR NATURAL GRADE. SEC SPOKANE TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER SHEET. . SHEET 1 SALMON RIVER LANE . SHEET 2 MICHIELLI LANE DETAILS SHEET 3 POND DETAILS SHEET 4 8,: T.25N., R.45E., W.M. COUNTY, WASHINGTON .0200 24' SEWER EASEMENT .................. SUBGRADE OF NATIVE GRAVELLY SOILS 1 EXPIRES 9/24/ GRAVEL ACCESS .0200 SWALE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WHEN THE CURBS ARE BACKFILLED AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. THE SWALES SHOULD BE GRADED OUT WITH FINE GRADING IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO SEEDING OR PLACEMENT OF SOD. 1. TOLERANCES FOR RECORD DRAWINGS: IN OUR PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT, ELEVATIONS THAT ARE WITHIN 0.05' OF DESIGNED ELEVATION ARE CONSIDERED TO BE BUILT AS DESIGNED. LENGTHS THAT ARE 0.10' OF DESIGNED LENGTH ARE CONSIDERED TO BUILT AS DESIGNED. IN THE EVENT THAT GREATER ACCURACY THAN THIS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR FUTURE DESIGNS OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, ADDITIONAL SURVEY INFORMATION SHOULD BE GATHERED. EPTH VARIE GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924 - 3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT TEMPORARY TURN — AROUND EASEMENT green Acre, VICINITY MAP r APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924 - 3655 INDEX MAP ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT : SHEET 1 R of 4R JOB NUMBER 95618 � DATUM nkI r-1 ERIS1T & S`113EWA 13 +00.51 INDIANA AVENUE= TOP LEFT CURB 2020 TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 / APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6' A.C. IRRIGATION UNE CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT SEE ISLAND DETAIL CURVE 1 RADIUS 1 LENGTH 1 TANGENT 189.95' 69'04'58" 20.00' 31.42' * CURVE INFORMATION REFERS TO BACK OF CURB REFER TO THE BENCHMARK DESCRIBED ON SHEET 1A OF 13 IN THE RIVERWALK SEWER EXTENSION PLANS APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY MAY 16, 1995. SEE SHEET 4AR FOR REVISED CURVE INFORMATION SALMON RIVER LANE EX= TOP CU o) in 0) • co jolts 4 I r.: II 0 N r r ,; n ±'; ^J > 0 + CJ . r- Q. e'l a ) . _ c' t c',1 . -- 9 0 9 7.52 , 5' CURS TRANSIT - 0.0080 - 0.0080 EXIST TOP/OF CIIIRB - EXIST. PAVEMENT 2027.52 50 VC 0 1n + 0) 0 �.l 50 0 Lfa 0) Ii r• N Cpl ■ lam 0 CJ cv to c ed 'J + f Cr) J N 10' UTILITY EASMENT .' 1 dr 71.00' - o.01200 - 0.0060 501 VC PLAI 11N' RIGHT SEE RIGHT ( APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIS 6" A.C. IRRIGATION UNE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT ® 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT NOTE: THIS PLAN MAY NOT SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE EXISTENCE AND ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 31 +78.52 SALMON RIVER LANE= 43 +04.56 MICHIELU LANE .0060 .0060 EXISTING GROUND EE SHEE SALMC GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 - 0.01200 CURB TRANSITION 3 T FINISH - 0.01200 50 VC t'7 EX 1 GRO FINISHED G RB INLET +39.0V =202 6 GRADE FIN SHED GRADE 30 +45 2026.25 TC 2030 TOP LEFT CURB 2020 2030 TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 ISLAND DETAIL 1 " =20' INTERSECTION DETAIL SEE SHEET 4AR FOR REVISED SALMON RIVER LANE L 2030 TOP LEFT CURB 2020 2020 TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 _31 +41 2025.54 TC - 0.0080 POND C2 4+04.23 ISHED GRADE "FINISHD GRADE - FINISHED GRADE 31 +78.52 SALMON RIVER LANE - 0.0080 z PLT BOUNDARY RECORD DRAWING NOTES 1. TOLERANCES FOR RECRD DRAWINGS: IN OUR PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT, ELEVATIONS THAT ARE WITHIN 0.05' OF DESIGNED ELEVATION ARE CONSIDERED TO BE BUILT AS DESIGNED. LENGTHS THAT ARE 0.10' OF DESIGNED LENGTH ARE CONSIDERED TO BUILT AS DESIGNED. IN THE EVENT THAT GREATER ACCURACY THAN THIS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR FUTURE DESIGNS OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, ADDITIONAL SURVEY INFORMATION SHOULD BE GATHERED. - 0.0080 - 0.0080 POND B1 POND B2 LOW POINT STA 44 +50 EL= 2023.76 � 03 N 0 N TEMPORARY SEWER ACCESS GRAVEL ROAD DETAIL L =1 1.8 6' 50.14' N09'04'41" / APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION UNE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT • 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT `-46 +58.85 10' UTILITY EASMENT EXISTING GROUND - REFER TO TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION OF GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD ON SHEET 1 47+14.59= CEN C 150.00' PLAT BOUNDARY +0.0080 +0.0080 EXISTI4 GROUND +0.0080 CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 147.47' - - -- TEMPORARY GRAVEL TURI AROUND / 46+60.11 2025.0 2025.0 46 +83.70 46 +83.82 2025.0 TEMPORARY GRAVEL 456 -80001 2024.9 2025.8 TURN- AROUND DETAIL \ 47 +64.27 47+19.59 2024.9 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 0 CONSTRUCT WHEELCHAIR RAMP PER SPOKANE COUNTY STD. A -5 CONSTRUCT SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE "A" CURB PER STD. A -3 INSTALL STREET AND STOP SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY AND M.U.T.C.D. STANDARDS U INSTALL STREET SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY AND M.U.T.C.D. STANDARDS 05 INSTALL SPOKANE COUNTY CURB INLET TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 PER STDS. B -8 AND B -9 STA=31+39.02 LT. 2030 TOP LEFT CURB 2020 2030 TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 0 Z cc � z z J _F.. a. § Paid h ° SHEET 2R of . 4R JOB NUMBER 95618 NOTES: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. TYPE "B" CURB f 18 TOP OF TYPE "B" CURB FLOW LINE TOP OF BERM ELEV.= TOP OF CURB ELEV. + .20' 6" i DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ---- WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS 5' TRANSITION FLOW LINE PLAN VIEW VARIES 5' TRANSITION I-. PROFILE VIEW CURB TRANSITION DETAIL TYPE "B" CURB TO TYPE "R" CURB NTS DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN .9' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER LINE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST CURB DROP TO THE POND VARIES GRATE ELEVATION TYPICAL '208' POND SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) TYPE "R" CURB TOP OF TYPE "R" CURB 4 " 14" 10" .50' R/W NORMAL ROLLED GUTTER LINE CURB 4:1 (TYP) 4" THICK P.C.C. GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE CONCRETE CURB OR CURB & GUTTER AS SPECIFIED IN PLANS CONCRETE APRON TROWEL EDGES WITH 1 /4" RADIUS EDGER (TYP) BROOM FINISH TOP OF BERM ELEV.= TOP OF CURB ELEV. + 0.20' 2' TYPICAL PLAN 4' LONG DROP (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) SECTION VIEW CURB INLET TYPE 1 (NOT TO SCALE) VARIES 2' TYPICAL DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN GUTTER LINE DROPPED GUTTER LINE .5' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER LINE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST CURB DROP TO THE POND APRON VARIES GRATE ELEVATION , „, .50' TYPICAL '208' POND SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) ASPHALT PAVEMEN R/W NORMAL ROLLED GUTTER LINE CURB r 4:1 (TYP) LAAL 4" THICK P.C.C. GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE NORMAL GUTTER FLOWLINE ELEVATION SECTION TYPE "B" CURB & GUTTER ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION TYPE "R" CURB /i /A// CONCRETE APRON TYPE "B" CURB & GUTTER DROPPED GUTTER LINE 2" NORMAL GUTTER FLOWLINE ELEVATION DROPPED GUTTER LINE TYPE "R" CURB 4" THICK P.C.C. 4" THICK P.C.C. CoPil A«tcg RECEIVED NOV 0 1 1996 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER co z 0 V) 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT RIGHT OF AY PLAT BOUNDARY BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA 6' SIDEWALK .:,a r 1 CONCRETE INLET TYPE I WITH, TYPE 1 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA=31+25 4 ' T GRATE ELEV 2023.96 5' IYP SALMON RIVER LANE 35.00' 12" CMP FT. 0.065 2021.32 SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD 2020.41 TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & LID WITH SOLID COVER STA =31 +25 ' T LID ELEV � 2024.91 59.02' POND "A2" POND BOTTOM ELEV = POND BOTTOM AREA = PERIMETER = 98 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2025.06 RECORD DRAWING I OR MY AGENT HAVE PERIODICALLY REVIEWED THE CONSTRUCTION AND TO MY KNOWLEDGE FIND IT TO BE IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED CERTIFIED PLANS AND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS NOTED. •• 1 2023.54 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT POND "B1" BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA POND BOTTOM ELEV = { POND BOTTOM AREA = PERIMETER = 100 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2025.06 2023.75 1" =20' BOUNDARY OF ;LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM ;AREA 2 POND "C2" ,- 2022.37 1" =20' S.F. POND BOTTOM ELEV = POND BOTTOM AREA - PERIMETER = 105.3 LF. , TOP OF BERM = 2023.98 Lite 2'a CURB INLET TYPE 1 & TYPE 2 STA =44 +50 TC =2023.76 \ - A \ .0 \ ,\ 5' TYP /4,96/ \ / \/ SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE " DRYWELL WITH N TYPE 4 MET � 2 & GRATE STA =44 +60 �51•i, 2 5.75' RT. GRATE ELEV= 1 . • 3 RECORD DRAWING NOTES 1. TOLERANCES FOR RECORD DRAWINGS: IN OUR PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT, ELEVATIONS THAT ARE WITHIN 0.05' OF DESIGNED ELEVATION ARE CONSIDERED TO BE BUILT AS DESIGNED. LENGTHS THAT ARE 0.10' OF DESIGNED LENGTH ARE CONSIDERED TO BUILT AS DESIGNED. IN THE EVENT THAT GREATER ACCURACY THAN THIS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR FUTURE DESIGNS OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, ADDITIONAL SURVEY INFORMATION SHOULD BE GATHERED. 2. POND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS HAVE NOT BEEN INSTALLED AS OF 10/29/9 2024.86 SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "8" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & LID WITH SOLID • STA =44 +60 °w'i 21.1' LT r LID ELEV = 2023.94 L CURB INLET TYPE STA= 1 TC 15 LF OF 12" CMP 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA DRAINAGE EASEMENT CONCRETE INLET TYPE I WITH TYPE 1 META �.' • ME & GRATE STA =44 +65 f � � 36.5' LT GRATE EL $►fi 2022.93 POND "B2" BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA DRAINAGE EASEMENT 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT CURB INLET TYPE 1 STA= TC 2024.05 POND BOTTOM ELEV = BOTTOM AREA = 3 3.6 S.F. PERIMETER = 73.7 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2024.66 2023.10 RIGHT OF WAY 2022.27 POND BOTTOM ELEV = POND BOTTOM AREA = .8 S.F. PERIMETER = 108 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2023.96 SHEET 4R OF 4R JOB NUMBER 95618 50 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25 50 100 NOTE: THIS PLAN MAY NOT SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. TY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE EXISTING UTILITY IN a■ Ems ( IN FEET i o 1 inch = 50 ft ONLY. IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE EXISTENCE AND ACTUAL LOCATION CONSTRUCTION. OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CO I 1 ! 1 I THE CONSTRUCTION A ND TO ! , I 0,,::::/1::).6,-74, , o , co F- N 6 \\ % F,, ,§:::-1: O \ �, h 0 x pc� rJ, `1,� G \�` 82 7;4 ♦ IIN.,, APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT J RECORD DRAWING I OR MY AGENT HAVE PERIODICALLY REVIEWED � I `, ? N o v • N '- (� `�� N� N� • ' d ' M u, v . � ° - N rn � ,. .� O + . M .. W , .� t. a X r y 4 � a: � _ , ��i -� b Cr) � p � ; N �n a, J I Z I O I _ ( ) ' I i _. 0 I i . Q I I Z I =; CV ( III 1 III I II I w III III MY KNOWLEDGE FIND IT TO BE IN SUBSTANTIAL \-; I I 1 � i— I \ f -� APPROVED CERTIFIED PLANS AND STANDARD t PLATTING I I / POND A2 it al. .1. CONFORMANCE WITH THE \ t ` SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS NOTED. SPEC ICA E � i , :�. i /y .: Y 4Yf , . a z z fat F � { , ,;, , .. , x z Y. „z .t�.w,ta :. •. ,„ LtL. f �. , • V. y� � Y J4 } �r+f ✓�`' >.. ,zer . +rt3 .�,t r- 00 + 0 R,.a � S :r 89 N t f� c N + O O :.. t:. . r • : 3 � .:: z '�/4.�,1. A f,z r r..._._ .; .. - . - . S" , 'f r. � p 00 N + N M N '”` ^— d $� .- + - r4 00 N 0 C o . — 2 S • o3 to 1 I 1 ' T / SEE RIGHT 1 I \ v --` \� /111 Illz I o i III Q lb Q 121H Z 1111 p I z III I II 3 (Io N III- I II Z III- W III o Uw �� ,. Z , / I = , 1 I i "I I ` / i / i // 01 / : ` ! ( o i Ltl z % f / / � �cfl w + L O SALMON RIVER LANE �N �•� � . X • �� G O N •, �• G + O (� 1 • �� p M �C! w0 1.1.1 (o h �� u7 Z 0 4 N, x (.0V , h a' r- O O �� p t� (� t0 N ry �'.X RECORD DRAWING NOTES ,. h 5'.. ` Z m117------"1. ' � o � X� � �C Z + / / 1 TI SIDEWALK N /UTILITY EASEMENT / , -- _ • ' 1 0 I F2: ! 1 . TOLERANCES FOR RECORD DRAWINGS: ! 0 IN OUR PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT, ELEVA THAT ARE WITHIN I < : -: CONSIDERED TO BE BUILT AS DESIGNED. LENGTHS THAT ARE 0.10' r TO BE BUILT AS DESIGNED. IN THE EVENT THAT GREATER ACCURACY / l lel p J °z -' - 1 Z' w vi 5 b.05' OF D ESIGNED ELEVATION ARE w px O r o , ., x 0 � x � p �0 -J m�� .. �1 �. W OF DESIGNED LENGTH ARE CO NSIDERED b. o THAN THIS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR � O , , • O INFORMATION SHOULD BE GATHERED. � U = • -� - EWAi SALMON RIVER I 1 < " ' IfIII�� i �� II • , • *F. f•. , • •,: ' mom : ,r- */ r -: .� - - �, / I 31 N2s•5 "v v FUTURE DESIGNS OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, ADDITIONAL SURVEY LANE j / 0 _.. TRACT ,m : C ; In 'i --- � tD � i r et riei p O Ch • gg�, n p _ c� ° +c�, I � N r 31 +78.52 • MON RIVER LANE= r j4 U / / -- . -- 13 +00.51 INDIANA AVENUE; Ill / Q / / ` rt. Y --I Q 30 +00 SALMON RIVER LANE l Y ( L) _•_J I I� Q I j J i'■ • �d . rn q M w0 • �� \ S Ott ► ° EG� X56 G R . Illo I Ili, n \ 1�'I t -. �I1 10' UTALITY- \ EASM 'NT \ E I Ljj _ • I II .H •'� I { Li.! /11: /� \I I 111?! !� 1 I •• IIIX � I ft' 11 ;' luWl i ( \ \ i \ 1 \ � ; \ \ ` ,= . I ; � t t 3 .;" . ROAD _ ;. 0 w EASEMENT " > I _ LIMITS 50' ROAD EASEMENT ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS III III III I II 5 , 2 5 3 �C 60 Z p'yA �C F�- Zp2a \o \-\ �, <<`� ; ' SEE RIGHT ,,� BORDER, SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT 18' ..• CAL 25' ►-+ 25, ,<&\''-43 ,c-, BORDER & UTILITY F , ( ���� EASEMENT 46' 12' 0, G I SLAND �t INTERSECTION DETAIL 5' APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT O 924 - 3655 \ ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT 10' 6_5' , -•— PAVED WIDTH VARIES 10' ISLAND 5' S' PAVED WIDTH VARIES MIN. ,,,, _ „�,_ „ CURB TYPE A .. 1.5' -•- 5' �— --- SCALE: 1" =20' 2'� 4f4 MIN. . 15 5 �''`� as xl,, 4..; .e TYPE A CURB 5 -.. ..—.. I VA RIES VARIES CURVE TABLE . y ice' SIDEWALK (ONE SIDE ONLY) 2• � CURVE RADIUS 1 LENGTH 1 TANGENT 1 CHORD 1 DELTA 6" CEMENT CONCRETE ON 4" ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D•0•T. I TYPICAL CROSS—SECTION BASE COURSE IN SPECIFICATIONS. SPO. CO. STD. TYPE "B" CURB & GUTTER C1 167.50' 201.96' 115.30' 189.95' 69'04'58" • DATUM : REFER TO THE BENCHMARK DESCRIBED ON SHEET A OF 13 IN THE RIVERWALK SEWED EXTENSION PLANS APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY MAY 16, 1995. SPOKANE p -C• �, T.�S N., R.45 E•,W• COUNTY, WASHINGTON • SALMON RIVER LANE ■ N.T.S. STA. 30 +40 TO .STA. 31+31.50 CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 456 -8®00 I 2030 : --0.d080 NG- _ 50 - 0.0060 VC - 1 C 96 O `I' 9 0 0 > 0067 2030 i 1 ! )2719 PVI=29+50 • c,4 6z.) + i0 cvsi 0 N i l a F 90 =gL •C L. 2g'gZOZ . _ _ 210=1.91A+1. 6Z'gZsZ 1 F • + , 1 . • • ' � ' _' TOP LEFT CURB 2020 I . I TOP LEFT CURB - I EXIST. CU if r`.6 r,) d 11; \ C RB NLET TYPE 1 I 2020 31 +20 TC= 2024.82 I ' ! M \ FINISHED \ 30 +81.37 =CR 1 ! ! ! ' 5' CUR + N 3 4 + N c i g ' TRANSITION c ' ' 4 : o • ' ' =IAd 'gZOZ 17+0C Pirld 3'gZOZ It7+0s GRADE I 1 2025.25 TC ! . - -.O. 1200 50 VC - 0.0060 1 1 ! i 2030 I j g N c V) n C`4 ' -- ; 6g I S 60' ' 60aZI: gL+0 99'gZOZ ti 'gZ II 2030 / GROU CA 2020 N•1 NS i )r 41 _ _ `T —`" + `- ►7 N O N 1 C/L 2020 l PAVEMENT ir _ FIN SHED GRADE • . +0C - 'g Z EXISTING � ____ _ j 2030 - 0.0060 087 '• ! I 2030 i I — __ CCP( ( m RECEIVED cZ +6 5 y r4 co co '. c c-3 SIN: NIL IN +I `,, ! NI � gZ +04 60 a025.94 gL+C 2g 'gZOi )= .y 6Z 'gZO Ho=Og'l 91 TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 I r, . 4zoz ! TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 I NOV 0 199 SPOKANE COUNTY icr ENGINEER EXIST. TOP OF C - . _ FINISHED GRADE 1 L() P- N ° 2025.8 T BDRY. -43 t=lAd 30 +81 =CR j ! + _ N + N N a as 0 0 2025.25 TG ANSITION .I ! cn II 0 o o ! M _a =cti-oc nN3AV %/WON! 1S=00+0£ 3 co C I ' IS=Z9'9L+ 3 j I ! 29 30 31 SHEET 4AR OF 4R JOB NUMBER 95618 ell 6 It 11111,1i EN It WAgr 42 In 1 El NC 9 8 all a I I MA• T BR. No.55 03 /%1 LASIECIMAIMOIMEristAns 6 /Ac 4;Z=ig:3;=i7i:= 0.4/Ac '9 No. 17.5 7 — 40 •RE,) 14,51 bt3AEL.ov.„.-A4E' 1 C\1 ES T: A L i 2 . 6 2.9S7A 3 I JJz A—AN1 17 REVISED DATE - -7Z EUCL/D IMI100111(01111MIO AVENUE zo• D" SCR/PT/OA/ 5- 5 /5 sEcrion/ REPRODucED FROA4 LI NEN TO 1661) -40 t-t YLA R. BY jERI R A Y 54 c § 0 N 9 I q FLAT No.1%1 l'5"reip MOM :7 .. v t DATE - /5 - 70 - 05 /5' 5 EcT:on/ REPRODUCED .30* it DSCR/PT/ON 45 FRO A4 LI NE N TO A.--;') R. BY RAky 011■111111111■ z °-N 0 E . AI 51/2 8 - 25 -45 /40.75 /40.62 / 40.55 /27.0 h I 0 „� , 2 _2 0 / 40.62 3 0: 140.21 __r• R 140.69 N 11 0. • 71.92 /19.24 G J 0 1176.7/ Sz ?-Z.5-&45 0 CURVE 1 RADIUS 1 LENGTH 1 TANGENT 1 CHORD 1 DELTA C1 17.50' 167.50' 201.96' 115.30' 189.95' 69'04'58" C2 T5 30.00' 47.12' 30.00' 42.43' 90 C3 N29'59'43 "W 30.00' 15.71' 8.04' 15.53' 30'00'00" C4 29.00' 30.00' 31.42' 17.32' 30.00' 60'00'00" C5 T12 30.00' 18.07' 9.32' 17.80' 34'30'50" C6 N3757'25 "E 30.00' 18.08' 9.32' 17.80' 34'31'20" C7 30.00' 47.12' 30.00' 42.43' 90'00'00" C8 30.00' 31.42' 17.32' 30.00' 60'00'00" C9 30.00' 15.71' 8.04' 15.53' 30'00'00" C10 185.00' 11.86' 5.93' 11.86' 03'40'28" C11 150.00' 7.33' 3.67' 7.33' 02'48'03" C12 185.00' 20.46' 10.24' 20.45' 06'20'17' C13 214.00' 23.67' 11.85' 23.66' 06'20'17" C14 211.00' 16.11' 8.06' 16.11' 04'22'29" C15 185.00' 14.13' 7.07' 14.12' 04'22'29" C16 150.00' 38.22' 19.22' 38.12' 14'36'03" C17 150.00' 20.70' 10.36' 20.68' 07'54'19" UNE 1 DIRECTION 1 DISTANCE T1 N85'03'01 "E 17.55' T2 S29'59'43" E 17.50' T3 N60'00'02"E 30.28' T4 N60'00'02"E 9.72' T5 N60'00'02"E 9.72' T6 N60'00'17" E 15.00' 17 N29'59'43 "W 59.02' T8 N39'41'12 "W 29.00' T9 N52'21'46 "W 29.00' T 10 N75 W 26.00' T11 N83'49'15 "W 26.00' T12 N40'47'24 "W 28.15' T13 N3757'25 "E 30.77' T14 N3757'25 "E 16.79' T15 N63'17'44 "W 28.15' NUMBER DIRECTION 1 NO0'00' 17' E 2 N85'28'53 "W 3 N25'28'57" E 4 S59'59'43"E 5 S84'35'47"W . 6 S83'43'22"W tO o, GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. LEGEND B.S. - BUILDING SETBACK 15'/20' B.S. -15' HOME AND 20' GARAGE BUILDING SETBACK TANGENT TABLE 0 RADIAL BEARINGS Q CURVE TABLE 100 0 -FND. 1/2" REBAR W /RPC STAMPED "RLS #22121" PER FINAL PLAT OF RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED -FND. 1/2" REBAR W/YPC STAMPED "MOORE 18091" PER FINAL PLAT OF RIVERWALK SECOND ADDITION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED SET 1 '2" REBAR W/YPC STAMPED " MOORE 18091 (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) AS: • - ANGLE POINT IN BOUNDARY -�• -LOT CORNER ® - CENTERUNE MONUMENT BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BEARING OF N.29'59'58"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF RIVERWALK, FIRST ADDITION. AS SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 23 OF PLATS, PAGES 37 THROUGH 40, WAS USED AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS ACCURACY STATEMENT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED USING A TOPCON GTS 303 TEN- SECOND THEODOLITE AND ELECTRONIC DISTANCE METER. FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS USED WERE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WAC 332 - 130 -90 SECTION "C". 1 - "gm INLAND IC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 SURVEYOR'S NOTES 1. THE AREA OF THE SUBDIVISION IS 2.58 ACRES. 2. TOTAL AREA FOR THE PRIVATE ROADS TRACT 0 IS 22,256 S.F. (.51 AC.) 3. TRACTS "A ", "B" AND "C" ARE COMMON AREAS. TEMPORARY SEWER AND ACCESS ESMT. AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S DOC. NO. 9603190212 .7 / / a No t).- 0 Cgis 4 7 J 2, de 3 17.5' 17.5' o' , 500 2, 1 `'st � 6600 S.F. T 1903 JP 4 115 % ••- 6o . T4 60 '5 ti \�� ' to C .NO C2 ® O e'•' s ' ... • \tea 2 • x••• 10' WIDE . U11L ESMT 1 � ,� jr . � 7099 S.F. o O 16.5' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTIL ESMT. co 03 '1 0 : O 11 11 Z•36 3 1917 7161 S.F. / 0` S S� 3, EASEM NT 7465 S.F. -L 1907 4 1/ .413 C0 14 • S 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & 0 - um.. ESMT. sc 4 .1‘... 09 ` c,41 v w , � < „0„.• , 2: e y 4 9 C M '''10' WIDE �. a p UTIL ESMT. 1904 0 _ at, 1 a O A m o n ti 7116 S.F. .' T5 00 0 A ./ /0 • 1,y, • DRAINAGE (1 AND UTIL r Gy ESMT. 'A6 0 i 7309 S.F 1912 • 4. r ° S 2 - 7596 S.F. �s 1908 tr. 14.81' 1 00•x' r - ESPJT. WIDE tLit 5 & 1 Ti 1 7186 S.F. I 19 N 3 u N7g Mi ei•��10 1 p 1 .9 1' �R / EEASSE 13 82' " 4 6928 S.F. 6 0' 1 6600 S.F. o , ' I1o.•' i \ ... - 9 �. 60 0 0 4* O UNPLATTED TRACT C COMMON AREA (ENCUMBERED BY DRAINAGE EASEMENT) 3300 S.F. c O N60'00 E 25.24' UNPLATTED t1J (TRACT "A" IS ENCUMBERED BY A DRAINAGE EASEMENT) TRACTS "A" AND " B " ARE COMMON AREAS. EXISTING EASEMENT AS PER AUD. DOC. NO. 9507280291 / EXISTING EASEMENT / AS PER AUD. DOC. ' NO. 9512140151 .°'. /�` / v C X3',9. / '� ✓/ m `rw,\ 0/ *- 1 �9 i / -- Z SHEET 1 OF 1 's O N04'05'24" E 35.04' 1 s / � i " / - \ .. l _/ , \ / \ i ) It 1r - )1A1A 1 \ ` r 1P _ A mr1 1 11 \ .. ,' 1 nvv 1 M v 1 110. �. E 1480 . 110 0 0 c7J1 4 6613 S.F. I P 1921 C1 11.15' 1480'55' 19i 1 49. . / 4 V .5' WIDE FENCE ESMT. i N60'00'02"E ) �� j >� 33.99' P J� �sh �o ,� � -,, / /// i . .. \ i i \ x,5'1 -- " 15P.•00' TEMPORARY TURNAROUND EASEMENT AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S DOC. N0. 9512120284 TEMPORARY SEWER AND ACCESS ESMT. AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S DOC. NO. 9603190212 1485'03' 35.10 -- 1 1 1 1 1; 1 1559 » Nab , 100.0 e t of .0 6 . .03 6202 S.F. 1 y ' 1922 I I Cia Naa 55' 19e / A r1 n 1T1 i \ 1 "�VVI V 1 1II4 o // /� \ / i 4 DEDICATION ^ r /'nn lr, v1 . V U 1 NI L./ 4 4 fn KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that STANTON - SPOKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership, and BANK OF AMERCIA N.W., NA., doing business as SEAFIRST BANK successor by name change to SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a National Banking Association, have caused to be plotted into Lots, Blocks, Common Areas and Street the land shown hereon, to be known as RIVERWALK, THIRD ADDITION being a parcel of land in the Southwest Quarter and Government Lots 5 and 6, of Section 8, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M., in Spokane County, Washington described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly comer of Tract "H" of RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION according to the plot recorded under Book 23 ' of Plots, Pages 37 thought 40; thence N.60'00'02"E. a distance of 33.99 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N.29'59'43" W. a distance of 153.03 feet; thence N.60'00' 17" E. a distance' of 25.24 feet; thence N.29'59'43"W. a distance of 110.00 feet; thence N.60'00' 17" E. a distance of 194.98 feet; thence N.04'05'24" E. a distance of 35.04 feet; thence N.09'04'41 "W. a distance of 49.14 feet; thence N.80'55' 19' E. a distance of 110.00 feet; thence N.85 "E. a distance of 35.10 feet; thence N.80'55' 19" E. a distance of 100.00 feet; thence S.09'04'41 "E. a distance of 117.82 feet; thence S.18'08'02"W. a distance of 141.78 feet; thence S.40'30'15"W. a distance of 130.05 feet; thence S.60'00'02"W. a distance of 215.13 feet to the Point of Beginning; The Tract "D" (the private roads), drainage easements and /or common areas shown on this plat are hereby dedicated to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION created by document recorded July 25, 1995 under State UBI Number 601 - 645 -799. Drainage Easements are hereby granted over Tracts " A " and "C" to the Riverwalk Owners Association. Drainage easements in Lots 1, Block 1, Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 2, Lots 2, and 3, Block 4, as platted and shown hereon, which are for the purpose of installing, operating, and maintaining drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or its successors in interest. The private roods, drainage easements and /or common areas cannot be sold or transferred and shall be considered subservient estates for tax purposes to the other lots created herein. The status of the areas designated as subservient estates for tax . purposes cannot be changed without filing a replat. The private roads, as shown hereon, are easements which provide a means of ingress and egress for those Tots within the Plat having frontage thereon. Drainage Easement in Tract "A", Lot 1, Block 1, and Lots 2 and 3, Block 2 are hereby granted to the public. Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plot may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained. 1 1 1 1 1 The owners of all lots within this subdivision shall be members of the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION and subject to the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws thereof. Subject to the DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTION AND RESERVATION OF EASEMENT, as recorded under Auditor's Document No. 950725031Z which by reference is made a part. thereof. WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, or maintain or otherwise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this plot. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private rood and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct. alter, repair, improve, maintain, or provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner(s), their heirs, successors or assigns including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. This Plat is subject to separate DECLARATION OF COVENANTS as recorded under Auditor's Document No. 9601030055 and which by reference is mode a part thereof. Spokane County is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all private roads, common areas and /or drainage easements. A perpetual sewer line easement for the installation, operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer over the private roods as shown hereon is hereby granted to Spokane County, its successors and assigns for the sole purpose of construction, installing operating, maintaining, repairing, altering, replacing, removing and all other uses or purpose which are or may be related to • a sewer system. Spokane County, its successor and assigns at all time hereinafter at their own cost and expense, may remove all crops. brush, gross or trees that may interfere with the construction, installing, operating, maintaining, repairing, altering, replacing, removing and all other uses or purpose which are /may be related to a sewer system. The grantors reserve the right to use and enjoy that property which is subject to this easement for the purposes which will not interfere with the county full enjoyment of the rights hereby granted; provided the grantors shall not erect or construct any building or other structure or drill on the easement or diminish or substantially add to the ground cover over the easement. The Easement described herein above is to and shall run with the land. The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their nome(s) on a petition for the formation of a UUD by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a UUD by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a UUD by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. Use of private wells and water system is prohibited. The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plon approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision; and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot. Utility Easements are hereby granted over the private roods and as shown hereon to the serving utility companies for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of the utilities. Together with the right to inspect said utilities and to trim, and /or remove brush and trees that may interfere with the construction, maintenance and operation of the same. Sixteen and one /half foot (16.5') Sidewalk Easements is hereby granted to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION along Salmon River Lane and a sixteen foot (16') Sidewalk Easement is hereby granted to the RIVERWAU< OWNERS ASSOCIATION along Michielli Lane as shown hereon. This Plat is subject to a Voluntary Mitigation Agreement as recorded under Auditor's Document No. 9507240089. A 6.50 foot fence easement across Lot 1 Block 1 is hereby to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION as platted and shown hereon. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the aforesaid owners have hereunto set their hands this day of ANTON T D ~ OPM N COMPANY, 5 • e ST EVEL E a Washington general partnership, BY: HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, BY: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION a Washington Corporation its Goner 1 a Washington Corporation its General Partner n Partner BY: C.14°116116 4 .14•11* 8Y: In: �P s 14 E t BANK OF AMERCIA NW. N.A. doing business as SEAFIRST BANK S' successor by name change to As Lender Only and Not as Owner SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a Notional Banking Association Given under my hand STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss County of !A % ) On this AL day of ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared BRIAN HOUSLEY, to me known to be the President of HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington General Partnership, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. st� a ». L. _ NOTARY PUBUC in and r e Stqte of Washington, residing at i L a My commission expires . • 2.00 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) Crcl )ss County of ) €t 'i*'tf. On this 7V day of 19 446 �iefore me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State f Washington, personally appeared •, to me • known to be the Miss•- President of DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, a Washington General Partnership, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said %���������� instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and 1M NE E purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said E. •�r, s, instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said : ,s /t4 f' 4.'y • r MOTA N A _ and official seal the day and year last above written. *L f. NOTARY PUBUC in and f. Stpte of Washington, residing at sua 1120 My commission expires • ITS: AxtAte C#t"' , 19 before me, the undersigned, a Notary • l • • ' 1 7►�•••• 1.3446 •• � �► AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE Filed for record this day of , 19 at M. in Book of Plats at page at the request of SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction i conformance with the requirements of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordina SPOKANE COUNTY DMSION OF UTILITIES Examined and approved this day of 19 Director, Spokane County Utilities SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Examined and approved this day of , 19 _. Spokane County Engineer SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING Examined and approved this day of , 19 Director, Spokane County Division of Building and Planning SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Examined and approved this day of , 19 _. for Spokane County Health Officer SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR Examined and approved this day of , 19 _ ; Spokane County Assessor by Deputy SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS This plat was approved and accepted by the County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, on this day of , 19 _._. SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER I do hereby certify that all taxes which have been levied and become chargeable against the land shown within this map have been fully paid this day of , 19 . STATE OF WASHINGTON County of n1•4 AI On this , t t 5 day of MAY I'AY , 19 RCP, before me, the undersigned, Notary Public in and for the ,$tats Qf Washington, personally appeared . to me known to be the Vitt Yr Ct of BANK OF AMERCIA N.W.. .A., that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. )ss ) Deputy a. yr Patrick J. Moore, PLS Certificate Number 18091 Chairman, Spokane County Commissioners Spokane County Treasurer by Deputy N • , PUBUC in and f Was ington, residing at My commission expires r the t•te of FINAL PLAT OF RIVERWALK THIRD ADDITION (A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 AND GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6 OF SECTION 8, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON CURVE: 1 RADIUS 1 LENGTH 1 . TANGENT .1 CHORD 1 DELTA C1 167.50' • 201.96' 115.30' 189.95' 69'04'58" C2 30.00' 47.12' 30.00' 42.43' 90'00'00" C3 30.00' 15.71' 8.04' 15.53' 30'00'00" C4 30.00' 31.42' 17.32' 30.00' 60'00'00" C5 30.00' 18.07' 9.32' 17.80' 34'30'50" C6 30.00' 18.08' 9.32' 17.80' 34'31'20" C7 30.00' 47.12' 30.00' 42.43' 90'00'00" C8 30.00' 31.42' 17.32' 30.00' 60'00'00" C9 30.00' 15.71' 8.04' 15.53' 30'00'00" C10 185.00' 11.86' 5.93' 11.86' 03'40'28" C11 150.00' 7.33' , 3.67' 7.33' 0748'03" C12 185.00' 20.46' 10.24' 20.45' 06'20'1 7 ir- C 13 214.00' 23.67' 11.85' 23.66' 06'20'17" C14 211.00' 16.11' 8.06' 16.1 1' 04'22'29" C15 185.00' 14.13' 7.07' 14.12' 04'22'29" C16 150.00' 38.22' 19.22' 38.12' 14'36'03" C17 150.00' 20.70' 10.36' 20.68' 0754'19" LINE 1 DIRECTION 1 DISTANCE T1 N8503'01 "E 17.55' T2 S29'59'43" E 17.50' T3 N60'00'02 "E 30.28' T4 N60'00'02 "E 9.72' T5 N60'00'02 "E 9.72' T6 N60'00'17"E 15.00' T7 N29'59'43 "W 59.02' T8 N39'41'12 "W 29.00' T9 N52'21'46 "W 29.00' T10 N75'04'1 7"W 26.00' T11 N83'49'1 5"W 26.00' T12 N40'47'24 "W 28.15' T13 N3757'25 "E 30.77' T14 N3757'25 "E 16.79' T15 N63'17'44 "W 28.15' NUMBER DIRECTION 1 N00'00' 17" E 2 N85'28'53 "W 3 N25'28 E 4 S59'59'43" E 5 S84'35'47" W 6 S83'43'22 "W i GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 O - ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. LEGEND 0 -FND. 1/2" REBAR W /RPC STAMPED " RLS #22121" PER FINAL PLAT OF RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED -FND. . 1/2" REBAR W /YPC STAMPED "MOORE 18091" PER FINAL PLAT OF RIVERWALK ,SECOND ADDITION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED SET 1/2" REBAR W /YPC STAMPED "MOORE 18091" (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) AS: • -ANGLE POINT IN BOUNDARY - -LOT CORNER ® - CENTERLINE MONUMENT B.S. -BUILDING SETBACK 15'/20' B.S. -15' HOME AND 20' GARAGE BUILDING SETBACK BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BEARING OF N.29'59'58" W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF RIVERWALK, FIRST ADDITION, AS SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 23 OF PLATS, PAGES 37 THROUGH 40, WAS USED AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS ACCURACY STATEMENT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED USING A TOPCON GTS 303 TEN - SECOND THEODOLITE AND ELECTRONIC DISTANCE METER. FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS USED WERE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WAC 332 - 130 -90 SECTION "C ". TANGENT TABLE 0 RADIAL BEARINGS Q Spokane, WA 99204 CURVE TABLE I>1 INLAND , PACIFIC ENGINEERING SURVEYOR'S NOTES 1. THE AREA OF THE SUBDIVISION IS 2.58 ACRES. 2. TOTAL AREA FOR THE PRIVATE ROADS TRACT D IS 22,256 S.F. (.51 AC.) 3. TRACTS "A ", "B" AND " C" ARE COMMON AREAS. TEMPORARY SEWER AND ACCESS ESMT. AS RECORDED UNDER UNPLATTED TRACT C COMMON AREA (ENCUMBE :RED BY DRAINAGE EASEMENT) 3300 S.F. 3T' N60'00'17"E 25.24' • '5 \ : C2 0. • © 17.5' 17. , p . / 00 4 1 0 � 'o o v'. � s 6600 S.F. `�° ' °0 1903 . 0 , • 60. 0 �0 X60 \ OO O 4 U 110.0 4 1N 6613 S.F. ` ` 1921 c11 11.15' 148055'19 " • 112.3 3 1917 7161 S.F. /1/ DRAINAGE 3 EASEMENT ME T S 2 Co oo Dc�• 1 2 7465 S.F. . 1907 , 16' WIDE t3` SIDEWALK & UTIL. ESMT. ti 0 6' T 40 0 -10' WIDE UTIL. ESMT. i 190 0 . 4 sr 1 '�� o 1(A. 7116 S.F. � � 2 . 7596 S.F. 'C 1908 14.81' N '0 0 oil \ . N :22 - .� �' - 6 S.F. + 1 �`� 1 C10 Ngp557186 '19 E.S.F. ) 100 .3 8 . 10' WIDE 5' I UTIL. ESMT. � �T11 VI i ;4--7 EAS 1920 (5) 2 6' : c3 N' 9'26'41 W 82' ,,ow Imo 101EMENT .91, (R) / 01 0' � N 1 4 v7 6928 S.F. 4 '6. 1916 3 S6� ' y 70 ..• • 13, T9' DRAINAGE (49 � / ,�` AND UTIL. 6\7' 6, / ESMT. 3 �L r 7309 S.F. , 7 _ 1912 1 0. o_ 0 6600 S.F. 0 6 3 NO4'05'24" E 35.04' S i N60'00'0 2" E 33.99' orr" 16 `a � JI -1� ■ 1 110.00' „E N8 0.55"19 1 • A� ° o. s X tA 1 1460 150.0 TEMPORARY TURNAROUND EASEMENT AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S , DOC. NO. 9512120284 N85'03'01" E 35.10' 1 1 1a �1 0 � o 1 • 10 N8 (1.55 : 19 , 100. 0 J 100 L 7 07 West 7th • • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -6844) UNPLATED ti. (TRACT "A" IS ENCUMBERED BY A DRAINAGE EASE:MENT) TRACTS "A" AND " ARE COMMON AREAS. EXISTING EASEMENT AS PER AUD. DOC. NO. 9507280291 / EXISTING EASEMENT AS PER AUD. DOC. / / / NO. 9512140151 ` i / s c .." "\/ OA\ S.. ,./.... 1// 0� / \/ / S2 s / / '� 0 / / SHEET bi 6 8:• \� \ L9. 10' WIDE \. 2� UTIL. ESMT. 1 . 7099 S.F. � ° v ; 16.5' WIDE SIDEWALK & v 1 UTIL. ESMT. T O 6 0 d/ /J ,1 \ / / L)11 /r 'DM A I I(' / I\I Vl_I\vvnL_r \ C r - 1;_)^ A r- r1 1T1 /l n I \ 1 I:\ .., I , LJ LJ l I I \J I V ���\ (V � /. 2 \. T, \ \ OF 1 / 1 / cr / / / \ / ( 0 1 DEDICATION O J TL) A / , - r 1 1 \nv I T N / eo / / / -1 \ • �>1� Ar A 1 Is 1 \I V \ vv/ - 1L_1 \ ^ r r - r\ t\ I r∎ .� L_ \-/ \1 A r\r \ITinnl nLJLJ1 1 Iv1 v KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that STANTON - SPOKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership, and SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a National Banking Association, have caused to be platted into Lots, Blocks, Common Areas and Street the land shown hereon, to be known as RIVERWALK, THIRD ADDITION being a parcel of land in the Southwest Quarter and Government Lots 5 and 6, of Section 8, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M., in Spokane County, Washington described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of Tract "H" of RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION according to the plat recorded under Book 23 of Plats, Pages 37 thought 40; thence N.60'00'02" E.. a distance of 33.99 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N.29'59 W. a distance of 153.03 feet; thence N.60'00'1 7"E. a distance of 25.24 feet; thence N.29'59'43 "W. a distance of 110.00 feet; thence N.60'00'1 7" E. a distance of 194.98 feet; thence N.04-'05'24" E. a distance of 35.04 feet; thence • N.09'04'41 "W. a distance of 49.14 feet; thence N.80'55'19 "E. a distance of 110.00 feet; thence N.85'03'01" E. a distance of 35.10 feet; thence N.80'55'19 "E. a distance of 100.00 feet; thence S.09'04'41" E. a distance of 117.82 feet; thence S.18'08'02 "W. a distance of 141.78 feet; thence S.40'30 W. a distance of 130.05 feet; : thence S.60'00'02 "W. a distance of 215.13 feet to the Point of Beginning; The Tract "D" (the private roads), drainage easements and /or common areas shown on this plat are hereby dedicated to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION created by document recorded July 25, 1995 under State UBI Number 601 - 645 -799. Drainage Easements are hereby granted over Tracts "A" and "C" to the Riverwalk Owners Association. Drainage easements in Lots 1, Block 1, Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 2, Lots 2, and 3, Block 4, as platted and shown hereon, which are for the purpose of installing, operating, and maintaining drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or its successors in interest. The private roads, drainage a easements and/or common areas cannot be sold or transferred / s sferred and shall be considered subservient estates for tax purposes to the other Tots created herein. The status of the areas designated as subservient estates for tax purposes cannot be changed without filing a replat. The private roads, as shown hereon, are easements which provide a means of ingress and egress for those lots within the Plat having frontage thereon. Drainage Easement in Troct "A', Lot 1, Block 1, and Lots 2 and 3, Block 2 are hereby granted to the put;lic. Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained. (3 \ The owners of all lots within this subdivision shall be members of the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION and subject to the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws thereof. Subject to the DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTION AND RESERVATION OF EASEMENT, as recorded under Auditor's Document No. 9507250312, which by reference is made a part thereof. . • WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, or maintain or otherwise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, • construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, or provide drainage or snow removal on a private . road. This requirement is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner(s), their heirs, successors or assigns including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. This Plat is subject subjecl,,ts sea •te DECLARATION OF COVENANTS as recorded under Auditor's Document No. _Q f and which by reference is made a part thereof. Spokane County is hereby gra ed the right of ingress and egress to all private roads, common areas and /or drainage easements. A perpetual sewer line easement for the installation, operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer over the private roads as shown hereon is hereby granted to Spokane County, its successors and assigns for the sole purpose of construction, installing operating, maintaining, repairing, altering, replacing, removing and all other uses or purpose which are or may be related to a sewer system. Spokane County, its successor and . assigns at all time hereinafter at their own cost and expense, may remove all crops, brush, grass or trees that may interfere with the construction, installing, operating, maintaining, repairing, altering, replacing, removing and all other uses or purpose which are /may be related to a sewer system. The grantors reserve the right to use and enjoy that property which is subject to this easement for the purposes which will not interfere with the county full enjoyment of the rights hereby granted; provided the grantors shall not erect or construct any building or other structure or drill on the easement or diminish or substantially add to the ground cover over the easement. The Easement described herein above is to and shall run with the land. The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. Use of private wells and water system is prohibited. The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision; and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale : of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot. - Utility Easements are hereby granted over the private roads and as shown hereon to the serving utility companies for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of the utilities. Together with the right to inspect said utilities and to trim, and /or remove brush and trees that may interfere with the construction, maintenance and operation of the same. . Sixteen and one /half foot (16.5') Sidewalk Easements is hereby granted to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION along Salmon River Lane and a sixteen foot (16') Sidewalk Easement is hereby granted to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION along ` Michielli Lane as shown hereon. This PIAt is subject to a Voluntary Mitigation Agreement as recorded under Auditor's Document No. 9507240089. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the aforesaid owners have hereunto set their of , 199___. STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Washington generat partnership, BY: HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation its General Partner BY: ITS: SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a National Banking Association BY: ITS: STATE OF WASHINGTON County of STATE OF WASHINGTON County of s )ss ACKNOWLEDGMENTS NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My commission expires NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My commission expires hands this day BY: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION a Washington Corporation its General Partner BY: ITS: On this day of , 19 ___, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared BRIAN HOUSLEY, to me known to be the President of HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington General Partnership, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. On this day of , 19 ___, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared PATRICK J. CARR, to me known to be the Vice - President of DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, a Washington General Partnership, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE Filed for record this day of 19___ at _ M. in Book of Plats at page at the request of This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. Examined and approved this Deputy SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE Patrick J. Moore, PLS Certificate Number 18091 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES day of , 19= Director, Spokane County Utilities SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Examined and approved this day of , 19 Spokane County Engineer SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING Examined and approved this day of , 19 Director, Spokane County Division of Building and Planning SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Examined and approved this day of , 19 for Spokane County Health Officer SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR Examined and approved this day of , 19 Spokane County Assessor by Deputy SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS This plat was approved and accepted by the County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, on this day of , 19 _ Chairman, Spokane County Commissioners SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER I do hereby certify that all taxes which have been levied and become chargeable against the land shown within this map have been fully paid this day of , 19_` STATE OF WASHINGTON s Spokane County Treasurer by Deputy County of ) On this __ day of , 19 ___, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared , to me known to be the of SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a National Banking Association, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My commission expires RECEIVED DEC 2 8 1995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINE DEC 2 1995 1-._' FINAL PLAT OF RIVERWALK THIRD ADDITION (A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 AND GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6 OF SECTION 8, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON CURVE RADIUS 1 LENGTH 1 TANGENT 1 CHORD 1 DELTA C1 167.50' 201.96' 115.30' 189.95' 69'04'58" C2 30.00' 47.12' 30.00' 42.43' 90'00'00" C3 30.00' 15.71' 8.04' 15.53' 30'00'00" C4 30.00' 31.42' 17.32' 30.00' 60'00'00" C5 30.00' 18.07' 9.32' 17.80' 34'30'50" C6 30.00' 18.08' 9.32' 17.80' 34'31'20" C7 30.00' 47.12' 30.00' 42.43' 90'00'00" 08 30.00' 31.42' 17.32' 30.00' 60'00'00" C9 30.00' 15.71' 8.04' 15.53' 30'00'0 '' 010 185.00' 11.86' 5.93' 11.86' 03'40'( 011 150.00' 7.33' 3.67' 7.33' 02'48' C12 185.00' 20.46' 10.24' 20.45' 0620'17" C13 214.00' 23.67' 11.85' 23.66' 0620'17" C14 211.00' 16.11' 8.06' 16.11' 0422'29" C15 185.00' 14.13' 7.07' 14.12' 04 016 150.00' 38.22' 19.22' 38.12' 14'36'03" C17 150.00' 20.70' 10.36' 20.68' 0754'19" LINE 1 DIRECTION DISTANCE T1 N85'03'01 "E 17.55' T2 S29'59'43" E 17.50' T3 N60'00'02 "E 30.28' T4 N60'00'02 "E 9.72' T5 N60'00'02 "E 9.72' T6 N60 00'17 "E 15.00' T7 N29'59'43 "W 59.02' T8 N39'41'12 "W 29.00' T9 N52'21'46 'W 29.00' T10 N75'04'17 "W 26.00' T11 N83'49'15 "W 26.00' T12 N40'47'24 "W 28.15' T13 N3757'25 "E 30.77' T14 N3757'25 "E 16.79' T15 N63'17'44 "W 28.15' NUMBER DIRECTION __ -- ...NO0'00'17'E 2 N85'28'53 "W 3 N25'28'57" E 4 S59'59'43" E 5 S84'35'47" W 6 S83'43'22 "W GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 Spokane, WA 99204 ( IN FEET ). 1 inch = 50 ft. LEGEND 0 -FND. 1/2" REBAR W /RPC STAMPED "RLS #22121" PER FINAL PLAT OF RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED -FND. 1 /2" REBAR W /YPC STAMPED MOORE 18091" PER FINAL PLAT OF RIVERWALK SECOND ADDITION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED SET 1/2" REBAR W /YPC STAMPED "MOORE 18091" (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) AS: -ANGLE POINT IN BOUNDARY 1- -LOT CORNER ® - CENTERLINE MONUMENT B.S. - BUILDING SETBACK 15'/20' B.S. -15' HOME AND 20' GARAGE BUILDING SETBACK BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BEARING OF N.29'59 W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF RIVERWALK, FIRST ADDITION, AS SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 23 OF PLATS, PAGES 37 THROUGH 40, WAS USED AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS ACCURACY STATEMENT THIS SURVF_Y WAS PERFORMED USING A TOPCON GTS 303 TEN - SECOND .THEODOLITE AND ELECTRONIC DISTANCE METER. FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS USED WERE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WAC 332 - 130 -90 SECTION "C" . TANGENT TABLE 0 RADIAL BEARINGS 0 CURVE TABLE 100 NLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 SURVEYOR'S NOTES 1. THE AREA OF THE SUBDIVISION IS 2.58 ACRES. 2. TOTAL AREA FOR THE PRIVATE ROADS TRACT D IS 22,256 S.F. (.51 AC.) 3. TRACTS "A ", "B" AND "C" ARE. COMMON AREAS. 0 60 -.5r1- 3 ' 4c. cu - `L s• N %, 0 ' c S -p \ O= • - 10' WIDE . UTIL. ESMT. s F, c9 1 iS . O ' 0 (7,3 + 2 ma,'. c s + G r p 7099 S.F. .o+- - 2 5 ° � 16.5 WID � � ( < SIDEWALK & • U UTIL. ESMT. T4 ti 6 T1 ( 2.1 T1 z 0 0 © QQ 17.5' 17.5' 1 ° O. � 0. o 6600 S.F. • °0 1903 e.. •� \ d • 600 4 cr •• \ CO \ - 6613 S.F. 1921 C1'1', 11.1 148 55' 19" E 112.3 1:1 N 7465 S.F. 2 1907 16' WIDE (( 9- SID UTIL. EWALK ESMT. & HS 7161 S, �F t'c 2 rpss?2' , ? 1 917 6� ( 2 ? ) co U 6 1 s T5 0 / / • •-10' WIDE �c9 UTIL. ESMT. 1904 � "'= 7116 S.F. � � ,p s LP 60 r /- . 0Y• c,/ " 2 7596 S.F. �� 1908 ° ' • 14.81' co 'o �.+ . - 10' WIDE � I UTIL. ESMT. ,I � � -I LT17 1 :rr 26' 5 N 7186 S.F. 1920 0, N79•2 546„ w 101.91' (R) DRAINAGE 13 EASEMENT is 77 • 6928 S.F. 14 6. 1916 ?38 s 6 .. ^D Ip 3 73, T • � DRAINAGE (R)a, % I•." ESMT. 3 ti vd+. 7309 S.F. 0 / , ' 1912 O \- D ,9, � N UNPLATTED N04'05'24 "E 35.04' TRACT C (ENCUMBERED BY DRAINAGE EASEMENT) 3300 S.F. , Od \•\ -sO• 60 O 1 . , 6600 S.F. . o 0_ c ..> •� O .•- OO o 0 0 • TEMPORARY SEWER AND ACCESS ESMT. AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S DOC. NO. 95 XXXXXX N60'00' 17" E 25.24' UNPLATTED ` (TRACT "A" IS ENCUMBERED BY A DRAINAGE EASEMENT) �- \ V r3 0 \ 5 . . - . i / // �/ i / .. .I I \I V L_I \VVr"\L_r\ r- 111.> ^ T A r. r\ I -r I r\ N 1 I I I\ . T\ L : I r J LJ I I I \./ I N \ ,- 0 f \ ) \ \ SHEET 1 OF 1 N60'00'02 "E j/ 33.99' I)" 1�( \7 \ o' ..--. 2 0 )8( � / \ 1 9 11 N80° 55 110.0 Yr X 0 . *6 o00 / - / i i ,,,\,„\ / ,� i 14 8055' " - 150. TEMPORARY TURNAROUND EASEMENT AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S DOC. NO. 95 XXXXXXXXXX N85'03'01 E 35.10' .. / - .- I \z 0 o \ o 00. N80 55 1 100.0 \ cr\ N 6 o . 7, \ 6202 S.F. 1922 C10 1480 55'19 E � 100.3 i DEDICATION TL) A r•T I 1 \r\ 1 ^ r - r' rl t\ I r\ .: L _v \./I N V / A r\r 1 rii 1 r - \ Li L/ I l l J I N i i J c N / / 1 0 / / 1 ELI DEC 0 6 1995 RE I ) -\ I V L_ I\ v V /-\ L_ r\ I\ /r ED\A/A I V KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that STANTON SPOKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership, MORVEST CAPITAL CORPORATION, a British Columbia Corporation and TIMBERLAND SAVINGS BANK, have caused to be platted into Lots, Blocks, Common Areas and Street the land shown hereon, to be known as RIVERWALK, THIRD ADDITION being a parcel of and in the Southwest Quarter and Government Lots 5 and 6, of Section 8, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M., in Spokane County, Washington described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of Tract "H" of RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION according to the plat recorded under Book 23 of Plats, Pages 37 thought 40; thence N.60 °00'02 "E. a distance of 33.99 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N.29'59'43 "W. a distance of 153.03 feet; thence N.60'00'17" E. a distance of 25.24 feet; thence N.29'59'43 "W. a distance of 1 10.00 feet; thence N.60'00' 17" E. a distance of 194.98 feet;thence N.04'05'24" E. a distance of 35.04 feet; thence N.09'04'41 "W. a distance of 49.14 feet; thence N.80'55'19 "E. a distance of 110.00 feet; thence N.8603'01" E. a distance of 35.10 feet; thence N.80'55'19 "E. a distance of 100.00 feet; thence S.09'04'41 "E. a distance of 117.82 feet; thence S.1608'02" W. a distance of 141.78 eet; thence S.40'30'15 "W. a distance of 130.05 feet; thence S.60'00'02" W. a distance of 215e to «;the Point of Beginning; The Tract "D" (the private roads), drainage easements and /or common areas shown on this plat are hereby dedicated to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION created by document recorded July 25, 1995 under State UBI Number 601 - 645 -799. Drainage Easements are hereby granted over Tracts "A" and "C" to the Riverwalk Owners Association. Drainage easements in Lots 1, Block 1, Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 2, Lots 2, and 3, Block 4, as platted and shown hereon, which are for the purpose of installing, operating, and maintaining drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or its successors in interest. The private roads, draina common areas cannot be sold or transferred. VThe status of the areas designated as subservient estates for tax purposes cannot be changed without filing a replat. The private roads, as shown hereon, are easements which provide a means of ingress and egress for those lots within the Plat having frontage thereon. Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated o:1 this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained. The owners of all lots within this subdivision shall be members of the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION and subject to the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws thereof. Subject to the DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTION AND RESERVATION OF EASEMENT, as recorded under Auditor's Document No. 9507250312, which by reference is made a part there f. . RA 1 NAG- 1 t .1 t 1--64 I O - 1 f G A c WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, or maintain or otherwise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, or provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with the land , and shall be binding upon the owner(s), their heirs, successors or assigns including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. SUBJECT to separate DECLARATION OF COVENANTS as recorded and which by reference is made a part thereof. Spokane County is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all private roads, common areas and /or drainage easements. A perpetual sewer line easement for the installation, operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer over the private roads as shown hereon is hereby granted to Spokane County, its successors and assigns for the sole purpose of construction, installing operating, maintaining, repairing, altering, replacing, removing and all other uses or purpose which are or may be related to a sewer system. Spokane County, its successor and assigns at all time hereinafter at their own cost and expense, may remove all crops, brush, grass or trees that may interfere with the construction, installing, operating, maintaining, repairing, altering, replacing, removing and all other uses or purpose which are /may be related to a sewer system. The grantors reserve the right to use and enjoy that property which is subject to this easement for the purposes which will not interfere with the county full enjoyment of the rights hereby granted; provided the grantors shall not erect or construct any building or other structure or drill on the easement or diminish or substantially add to the ground cover over the easement. The Easement described herein above is to and shall run with the land. The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. Use of private wells and water system is prohibited. The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision; and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot. Utility Easements are hereby granted over the private roads and as shown hereon to the serving utility companies for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of the utilities. Together with the right to inspect said utilities and to trim, and /or remove brush and trees that may interfere with the construction, maintenance and operation of the same. Sixteen foot (16.5') Sidewalk Easements is hereby granted to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION along Salmon River Lane and a sixteen foot (16') Sidewalk Easement is hereby granted to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION along Michielli Lane as shown hereon. This Plat is subject to a Voluntary Mitigation Agreement as recorded under Auditor's Document No. 9507240089. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the aforesaid owners have hereunto set their hands this day of , 199____ . STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Washington general partnership, BY: HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation its General Partner BY: ITS: MORVEST CAPITAL CORPORATION, a British Columbia Corporation BY: STATE OF WASHINGTON County of STATE OF WASHINGTON County of r2 W ;N epti )s s ) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane My commission expires )ss Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane My , commission expires BY: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION a Washington Corporation its General Partner, BY: ITS: TIMBERLAND SAVINGS BANK, a Washington Corporation BY: ITS: ITS: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS On this day of , 19 ___, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared BRIAN HOUSLEY, to me known to be the President of HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington General Partnership, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed . (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. , 19 ___, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in On this day of and for the State of Washington, personally appeared PATRICK J. CARR, to me known to be the Vice - President of DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, a Washington General Partnership, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that ie is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. AUDITOR'S CE RTIFICATE Filed for record this day of , 19___ at __ M. in Book of Plats at page at the request of This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. Examined and approved this Examined and approved this Examined and approved this PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Country of Canada Deputy SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE Patrick J. Moore, PLS Certificate Number 18091 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES day of , 19 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Director, -Spokane County Utilities Examined and approved this • day of - , 19 . Spokane County Engineer SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING day of , 19 _. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Director, Spokane County Division of Building and .Planning day of , 19 . for Spokane County Health Officer SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR Examined and approved this day of , 19 - Spokane County Assessor by Deputy SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS This plat was approved and accepted by the County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, on this day of , 19 Chairman, Spokane County Commissioners SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER I do hereby certify that all taxes which have been levied and become chargeable against the land shown within this map have been fully paid this day of , 19_ )ss Spokane County Treasurer by Deputy STATE OF WASHINGTON County of On this day of , 19 ___, befog^ me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared , to me known to be the President of TIMBERLAND SAVINGS BANK, a Washington Corporation, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for th'= uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute We said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corl.>oration. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last aL:ve written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the. ' to of Washington, residing at Spokane My commission expires On this day of , 19 ___, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the Province of British Columbia, personally al _1 eared , to me known to be the Vice- 1',_'�sident of MORVEST CAPITAL CORPORATION, a British Columbia Corporation, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the fre and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mention; :'. and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the s >•1 I affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last of ve written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the Proving of British Columbia, residing at My commission expires RECEIVED DEC 0 7 1995 SPOKANE OEXJMT' ENGiNEEA FINAL PLAT OF RIVE WALK THIRD 1_--\\ DITION (A PLANNED UNIT DEVEI :,OPMENT) LOCATED IN THE SwI 1/4 AND GOVERNMENT L0ri' 5 ADD 6 OF SECTION 8, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, ASHINGTON CURVE 1 RADIUS 1 LENGTH ( TANGENT 1 CHORD 1 DELTA C1 30.28' 167.50' N60 E 201.96' T5 ' 115.30' 189.95' 69'04'58" C2 30.00' 47.12' 30.00' 42.43' 90'00'00" C3 30.00' 15.71' 8.04' 15.53' 30'00'00" C4 30.00' 31.42' 17.32' 30.00' 60'00'00" C5 30.00' 18.07' 9.32' 17.80' 34'30'50" C6 30.00' 18.08' 9.32' 17.80' 34'31'20" C7 30.00' 47.12' 30.00' 42.43' 90'00'00" C8 30.00' 31.42' 17.32' 30.00' 60'00'00" C9 30.00' 15.7V 8.04' 15.53' 30'00'00" C10 185.00' 11.86' 5.93' 11.86' 03'40'27" C11 150.00' 7.33' 3.67' 7.33' 02'48'03" LINE 1 DIRECTION ) DISTANCE T1 N8603'01" E 17.55' T2 S29 E 17.50' T3 N60 E 30.28' T4 N60 E 9.72' T5 N60 "E 9.72' NUMBER DIRECTION 1 N00'00' 17' E 2 N85'28'53 "W 3 N25 E 4 S59 E 5 S84'35'47" W 6 S83'43'22 "W GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. LEGEND SET 1(2" REBAR W /YPC STAMPED "MOORE 18091' (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) AS: O -ANGLE POINT IN BOUNDARY �- -LOT CORNER • - CENTERLINE MONUMENT 100 O -FND. 1/2" REBAR W /RPC STAMPED "RLS #22121" PER FINAL PLAT OF RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED -FND. 1 /2" REBAR W /YPC STAMPED MOORE 18091" PER FINAL PLAT OF RIVERWALK SECOND ADDITION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED B.S. - BUILDING SETBACK 15'/20' B.S. -15' HOME AND 20' GARAGE BUILDING SETBACK BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BEARING OF N.29'59'58 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF RIVERWALK, FIRST ADDITION, AS SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 23 OF PLATS, PAGES 37 THROUGH 40, WAS USED AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS ACCURACY STATEMENT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED USING A TOPCON GTS 303 TEN- SECOND THEODOLITE AND ELECTRONIC DISTANCE METER. FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS USED WERE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WAC 332 - 130 -90 SECTION "C ". TANGENT TABLE 0 RADIAL BEARINGS 0 CURVE TABLE UNPLATTED SURVEYOR'S NOTES 1. THE AREA OF THE SUBDIVISION IS 2.58 ACRES. 2. TOTAL AREA FOR THE PRIVATE ROADS TRACT D IS 22,256 S.F. (.51 AC.) 3. TRACTS "A", "B" AND "C" ARE COMMON AREAS. INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 UNPLATTED N04'05'24 "E 35.04' TRACT C - 3300 S.F. #.tc •b4 0 ' 6 0 00 1 o ° o. ' O 6600 S.F. 0 0. 20 %' \ .• •''% 0 00 6 17.5' 17. O ° o, ) 0 6600 S.F. P . 0 0. T.J. • I • � • 60 C3 0 7099 S.F. '0 r 16' WIDE . . � SIDEWALK & 40 UTIL. ESMT. 4 11 0.00' 0 N c ' 6613 S.F. `�' C 11.15' ' "E 112.36' 1 0 '/ o 70 2 . / F. (� :'/ 3 S.F. S.F. WIDE SIDEWALK & UTIL. ESMT. oo U 6 a tsor (0 10' WIDE UTIL. ESMT. 1 7116 S.F. T5 0 00 3 7309 S.F. c o ' 2 �a 7596 S.F. s 14.81' o 0 , 0' 'co 7186 S.F. N79• 26 '46 'Iy iv) 1 01.9 • (R 13.81' 6928 S.F. 146 7O`3 ,:;..56' (R) N60'00' 17" E 25.24' s.. � 1 d' 6 0 4 - 11 55'1C E N8 N8503'01" E 35.10' 1559 » 1480 , 100.00 ( 5 3 ") . 1 1 0 6202 S.F. 1 C10 14805 "E 0 100.38' .. --1 0' WIDE 5' r 0 s° UTIL. ESMT. 5 . ri ' 1 1 ..a 09 N N60'00'02" E 33.99' ����� i A - k tfA 2 W C i ■ ��: / / i� > 1 \ ir - ^)+,A!A I V \I V 1 _ 1 \ V C \ R ^ `, A r1 r1IT1nn1 '. 1C-1 r-\ .; 1 r LJ LJ 1 1 1 v \� SHEET 1 OF 1 X 60 / A s // A' A \ i � / 4 0 7/ 'rLD A /\T 1 1 \n.d 1 / I r■ `) L_`/ \J I'1 LJ A 1TI/11∎ I r‘ vIJI 11\/1 v :)I\ /r /A 1 It 1 \I V L_I \ vvnL.r \ T / 3 N / 1 P / 1 �b 1 1 DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Washington general partnership, MORVEST CAPITAL CORPORATION, a British Columbia Corporation and TIMBERLAND SAVINGS BANK, have caused to be platted into Lots, Blocks, Common Areas and Street the land shown hereon, to be known as RIVERWALK, THIRD ADDITION being a parcel of land in the Southwest Quarter and Government Lots 5 and 6, of Section 8, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M., in Spokane County, Washington described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of Tract " H" of RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION according to the plat recorded under Book 23 of Plats, Pages 37 thought 40; thence N.60'00'02 "W. a distance of 33.99 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N.29'59'43 9 W. a distance of 153.03 feet; thence N.60'00'17"E. a distance of 25.24 feet; thence N.29'59'43 "W. a distance of 110.00 feet; thence N.60'00'17'E. a distance of 194.98 feet; thence N.04'05'24" E. a distance of 35.04 feet; thence N.03'04'41 "W. a distance of 49.14 feet; thence N.80'55'19 9 E. a distance of 110.00 feet; thence N.85'03'01 "E. a distance of 35.10 feet; thence N.80'55'19 "E. a distance of 100.00 feet; thence S.09'04'41 "E. a distance of 117.82 feet; thence S.18'08'02 "W. a distance of 141.78 feet; thence S.40'30'15 "W. a distance of 130.05 feet; thence S.60'00'02 "W. a distance of 215.12 feet to the Point of Beginning; The private roads, drainage easement and /or common areas shown on this plat are hereby dedicated to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION. The private roads, drainage easements and /or common areas cannot be sold or transferred regardless of any provisions in the covenants to the contrary without the expressed written approval by Spokane County, and shall be considered subservient estates for tax purposes to the other lots created herein. The private roads, as shown hereon, are easements which provide a means of ingress and egress for those Tots within the Plat having frontage thereon. Tract D / being private roads are hereby dedicated to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION created by document recorded , 1995 under State UBI Number Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained. The owners of all lots within this subdivision shall be members of the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION and subject to the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws thereof. Subject to the DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTION AND RESERVATION OF EASEMENT, as recorded under Auditor's Document No. , which by reference is made a part thereof. WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, or maintain or otherwise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, or provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner(s), their heirs, successors or assigns including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. Private roads are subject to separate DECLARATION OF COVENANTS as recorded and which by reference is made a part thereof. Subject to separate Declaration of Covenant as recorded under Auditor's Document No. Spokane County is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all private roads, common areas and /or drainage easements. A perpetual sewer line easement for the installation, operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer over the private roads as shown hereon is hereby granted to Spokane County, its successors and assigns for the sole purpose of construction, installing operating, maintaining, repairing, altering, replacing, removing and all other uses or purpose which are or may be related to a sewer system. Spokane County, its successor and assigns at all time hereinafter at their own cost and expense, may remove all crops, brush, grass or trees that may interfere with the construction, installing, operating, maintaining, repairing, altering, replacing, removing and all other uses or purpose which are /may be related to a sewer system. The grantors reserve the right to use and enjoy that property which is subject to this easement for the purposes which will not interfere with the county full enjoyment of the rights hereby granted; provided the grantors shall not erect or construct any building or other structure or drill on the easement or diminish or substantially add to the ground cover over the easement. The Easement described herein above is to and shall run with the land. The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be pro 1,ded to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems shfl not be authorized. Use of private wells and water system is prohibited. The public water pursuant the Water Plan approved by county p c wa system, pu su to th ater appr d y unty and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision; and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each individual and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot. Utility Easements are hereby granted over the private roads and as shown hereon to the serving utility companies for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of the utilities. Together with the right to inspect said utilities and to trim, and /or remove brush and trees that may interfere with the construction, maintenance and operation of the same. Sixteen foot (16') Sidewalk Easements are granted along Salmon River Lane as shown hereon. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the aforesaid owners have hereunto set their hands this day of , 199___. STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Washington general partnership, BY: HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation its General Partner BY: ITS: MORVEST CAPITAL CORPORATION, a British Columbia Corporation BY: ITS: TIMBERLAND SAVINGS BANK, a Washington Corporation BY: ITS: STATE OF WASHINGTON County of On this day of , 19 ___, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and fol the State of Washington, personally appeared BRIAN HOUSLEY, to me known to be the President of HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington General Partnership, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is, authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss County of NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane My commission expires SS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BY: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION a Washington Corporation its General Partner BY: ITS: On this day of , 19 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared PATRICK J. CARR, to me known to be the Vice-President of BU G CORPORATION, DEAN ILDIN a Washington General Partnership, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane My commission expires AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE Filed for record this day of , 19___ at ___ M. in Book of Plats at page at the request of This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. Examined and approved this Examined and approved this STATE OF WASHINGTON s PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ) Country of Canada Deputy SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE )ss Patrick J. Moore, PLS Certificate Number 18091 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES day of 19 Director, Spokane County Utilities SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Examined and approved this day of , 19 . Spokane County Engineer SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING AND BUILDINGS Examined and approved this day of 19 _. Director, Spokane County Planning Department SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Examined and approved this day of , 19 _. for Spokane County Health Officer SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR day of , 19- SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Spokane County Assessor by Deputy This plat was approved and accepted by the County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, on this day of , 19 _ Chairman, Spokane County Commissioners SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER I do hereby certify that all taxes which have been levied and become chargeable against the land shown within this map have been fully paid this day of , 19_ Spokane County Treasurer by Deputy County of ) On this day of , 19 ___, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared , to me known to be the President of TIMBERLAND SAVINGS BANK, a Washington Corporation, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane My commission expires On this day of 19 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the Province of British Columbia, personally appeared , to me known to be the Vice- President of MORVEST CAPITAL CORPORATION, a British Columbia Corporation, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and .official seal the day and year last above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the Province of British Columbia, residing at My commission expires PRELIMINARY OCT 13 7996 FINAL PLAT OF LP,EU RIVERWALK THIRD ADDITION LOCATED IN THE S 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 AND GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6 OF SECTION 8, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 0 -FND. 1/2" REBAR W /RPC STAMPED "RLS #22121" PER FINAL.. PLAT OF RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED -FND. 1/2" REBAR W /YPC STAMPED "MOORE 18091" PER FINAL PLAT OF RIVERWALK SECOND ADDITION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED LEGEND SET 1/2" REBAR W /YPC STAMPED "MOORE 18091" (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) AS: ® -ANGLE POINT IN BOUNDARY -LOT CORNER - CENTERLINE MONUMENT B.S. - BUILDING SETBACK 15'/20' B.S. -15' HOME AND 20' GARAGE BUILDING SETBACK BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BEARING OF N.29'59'58 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF RIVERWALK, FIRST ADDITION, AS SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 23 OF PLATS, PAGES 37 THROUGH 40, WAS USED AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED USING A TOPCON GTS 303 TEN- SECOND THEODOLITE AND ELECTRONIC DISTANCE METER. FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS USED WERE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WAC 332-130-90 SECTION "C ". TANGENT TABLE LINE 1 DIRECTION 1 DISTANCE Ti N85'03'Ot "E 17.55' T2 S29'S9'43 "E 17.50' T3 N60'00'02" E 30.28' T4 N60'00'02" E 9.72' T5 N60'00'02" E 9.72' 0 RADIAL BEARINGS '0 NUMBER DIRECTION 1 N00'00' 17" E 2 N85'28'53"W 3 N25'28'S7" E 4 S59'S9'43" E 5 S84'35'47'W, 6 S83 43'22 "W CURVE TABLE CURVE 1 RADIUS 1 LENGTH 1 TANGENT J CHORD DELTA C1 167.50' 201.96' 115.30' 189.95' 69'04'58" C2 30.00' 47,12' 30.00' 42.43' 90'00'00" C3 30.00' 15.71' 8.04' 15.53' 30'00'00" C4 30.00' 31.42' 17.32' 30.00' 60'00'00" C5 30.00' 18.07' 9.32' 17.80' 34'30'50" C6 • 30.00' 18.08' 9.32' 17.80' 34'31'20" C7 30.00' 47.12' 30.00' 42.43' 90'00'00" C8 30.00' 31.42' 17.32' 30.00' 60'00'00" C9 30.00' 15.71' 8.04' 15.53' 30'00'00', 010 185.00' 11.86' 5.93' 11.86' 03`40'27 ":' C 11 150.00' 7.33' 3.67' 7.33' 02'48'03" SURVEYOR'S NOTES THE AREA OF THE SUBDIVISION IS 2.58 ACRES. 2. TOTAL AREA FOR THE PRIVATE ROADS TRACT D IS 22,256 S.F. (.51 AC.) 3. TRACTS "A ", "B" AND "0" ARE COMMON AREAS. INLAND PA ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 N60'0017"E 25.24' - 17.5' 1 17.5' ,s 7099 S.F. \ 16' WIDE . i SIDEWALK & CP •0 UTIL. ESMT. u . 6613 S.F. UNPLATTED TRACT C 3300 S.F. UNPLATTED 04'05'24" E 35.04= DEDICATION T'L) A / \T I \ r L. I Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are 'requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained. The owners of all lots within this subdivision shall be members of the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION and subject to the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws thereof. Subject to the DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTION AND RESERVATION OF EASEMENT, as recorded under Auditor's Document No. , which by reference is made a part thereof. WARNING: Spokane County has no respons ii ility ta improve, or maintain or otherwise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said N private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, or provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner(s), their heirs, successors or assigns including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. 1 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,' a Washington general partnership, MORVEST CAPITAL CORPORATION, a British Columbia Corporation and TIMBERLAND SAVINGS BANK, have caused to be platted into Lots, Blocks, Common Areas and Street the land shown hereon, to be known as RIVERWALK, THIRD ADDITION being a parcel of land in the Southwest Quarter and Government Lots 5 and 6, of Section 8, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M., in Spokane County, Was in on described as follows: t : Beginning at -. he' m t northerly corner of Tract "H" of RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION according to )the plat recorded under Book 23 of Plats, Pages 37 thought 40; thence N.60'00'02 "(W.2 a distance of 33.99 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence - N.29'59'43 "W. a distance of 153.03 feet; thence N.60'00'17 "E. a distance of 25.24 f feet; thence N.29'59'43 "W. a distance of 110.00 feet; thence N.60'00'17'E. a distance of 194.98 feet; thence N.04 05'24" E. a distance of 35.04 feet; thence . 'N.03;04'41 "W. a distance of 49.14 feet; thence N.80'55'19 "E. a distance of 110.00 - -- feet; thence N.85'03'01 "E. a distance of 35.10 feet; thence N.80'55'19" E. a distance of 100.00 feet; thence S.09'04'41" E. a distance of 117.82 feet; thence S.18'08'02 "W. a distance of 141.78 feet; thence 5.40'3,015 "W. - distance of_ 130.05 feet; thence S.60'00 ' 02 W. a distance of 215 12`fee to the Point of Beginning `,\ F The private roads, drainage easement and /or common areas shown on this plat are hereby dedicated to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION. The private roads, drainage easements and /or common areas cannot be sold or transferred reg,a.r-dless -of any- _:provisions-, ir) he , i?pl 1 0- covenants -to -- the - cant without- tbe-- ex-xr- s approval --b - fspnkane`CQ and shall be considered subservient estates for tax pu pr os t- e-- the._other lots_c.reated herein. The private roads, as shown hereon, are easements which provide a means of ingress and egress for those lots-- wit- -i:h havi , �.ntage- - -•n � - ` f/x �/ i ' / ei 76c fo fr l 1 put r fc , ... (1 Ei {I'9 �; / - Icc ✓v , e 1 Tr : "D" being private` roads are hereby, .dedica ea • - - RWALK OWt4ERS ASSOCIATION cre• document recorded FB I'L i t , 1995 under State UBI Number - 7 t C7 Private ads are `subject to separate DECLARATION OF 'COVENANTS a l f � : \ . ' , !� -(._ and/ which- - by 'ref ere -r t jSubject to separate Declaration of Covenant as recorded /Auditor's Document No. ,( Spokane County is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all private common areas and /or drainage easements. A perpetual sewer line easement for the installation, operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer over the private roads as shown hereon is hereby granted to Spokane County, its successors and assigns for the sole purpose of construction, installing operating, maintaining, repairing, altering, replacing, removing and all other uses or purpose which are or may be related to a sewer system. Spokane County, its successor and assigns at all time hereinafter at their own cost and expense, may remove all crops, brush, grass or trees that may interfere with the construction, installing, operating, maintaining, repairing, altering, replacing, removing and all other uses or purpose which are /may be related to a sewer system. The grantors reserve the right to use and enjoy that property which is subject to this easement for the purposes which will not interfere with the county full enjoyment of the rights hereby granted; provided the grantors shall not erect or construct any building or other structure or drill on the easement or diminish or stee stantially add to the ground cover over the easement. The Easement described herein above is to and shall run with the land. The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW / 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED this condition shall shot prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. - A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be -\)< provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. Use of private wells and water system is prohibited. The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision; and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot. ility Easements are hereby granted over the private roads and as shown hereon to the e ing utility companies for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of the utilities. Together with the right to inspect said utilities and to trim, and /or remove brush and trees that may interfere with the construction, maintenance and op titi of the same. - Sixteen foot 16' Sidewalk Easements are granted al foot ( 16') g along "Salmon River Lane as shown hereon, ////?S /7 /7 %6 ( l -f � / j1 i.i.LA 7:( 7° a r l,1,-) /� 4 r° /"j (2 .y frig c ). / ' i,'(i!' J G' I" _ r` ?mot !r . 1 r 2�' ° / /�? r Ci ft, . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the aforesaid owners have hereunto of , 199___. STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. a Washington generaj. partnership, (U `r rue , :;11 t' + v 1 v l t .Fj 2, fit' :i' I I ✓" t . } c:( BY: HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation its General Partner MORVEST CAPITAL CORPORATION, a British Columbia Corporation BY: TIMBERLAND SAVINGS BANK, a Washington Corporation BY • ITS: STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON G IiU:'1 t ACKNOWLEDGMENTS NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane My commission expires NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane My commission expires set their hands this day under -. fi ewe % t" , roads, .)„01 , } /n �. BY: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION a Washington Corporation its General Partner County of ) On this day of , 19 ___, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared BRIAN HOUSLEY,, to ,•2e , known to be the President of HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington General Partnership, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. County of ) On this day of , 19 _ -_, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State .of Washington, personally appeared P,,ATRI,CK,,J. I�R tome;�,�t iy_m- l,t;(>? , known to be the Vice - President of DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, a'Washing n General Partnership, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE Filed for record this day of , 19___ at M. in Book of Plats at page at the request of Deputy SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. Patrick J. Moore, PLS Certificate Number 18091 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES Examined and approved this day of 19 Director, Spokane County Utilities SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Examined and approved this day of 19 _. Examined and approved this Examined and approved this PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ) r-- Spokane County Engineer SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING AND BUILDINGS SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Director, Spokane County Planning Department L,3 / , ` rai l SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT ' f Examined and approved this day of 19 for Spokane County Health Officer SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR day of , 19 _. Spokane County Assessor by Deputy This plat was approved and accepted by the County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, on this day of , 1 9 _ Chairman, Spokane County Commissioners SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER I do hereby certify that all taxes which have been levied and become chargeable against the land shown within this map have been fully paid this day of , 19- Spokane County Treasurer by Deputy STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss County of ) On this day of , 19 .___, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared , to me known to be the President of TIMBERLAND SAVINGS BANK, a Washington Corporation, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the Province of British Columbia, residing at My commission expires NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane My commission expires )ss Country of Canada J c fv c 'tJ ✓ t .� tf11 1,1 "UIctU 4 On th day of Y 19 _, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the Province of British Columbia, personally appeared , to me known to be the Vice- President of MORVEST CAPITAL CORPORATION, a British Columbia Corporation, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. RIVERWALK THIRD ADDITION LOCATED IN THE S- 112 OF THE SW 1/4 AND GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6 OF SECTION 8, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TOP OF BERM ELEV.= TOP OF CURB ELEV. + .20' R/W DRAINAGE STRUCTURE WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS NOTES: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. X 208 CROSS SECTION RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION 3 MAX. Q 1 DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN .9' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER LINE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST CURB DROP TO THE POND GRATE ELEVATION 3 MAX. .50' TYPICAL '208' POND SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) SCALE: 1 " =20' 10/30/95 R/W NORMAL GUTTER LINE 4:1 (TYP) 4 THICK P.C.C. GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE ROLLED CURB /A, / /,. // CONCRETE APRON I rim INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 ` Sp =kane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 TOP OF BERM ELEV.= TOP OF CURB ELEV. + .20' dfat,alt.ali It, 3 MAX. NOTES: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN .5' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER LINE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST CURB DROP TO THE POND GRATE ELEVATION 3 MAX. .50' TYPICAL '208' POND SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) R/W NORMAL ROLLED GUTTER LINE CURB 4:1 (TYP) 4 THICK P.C.C. GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE CONCRETE APRON /., / /., /i 208 CROSS SECTION RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION SCALE: 1 " =20' 10/30/95 hem INLAND I PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 SCALE: 1" =20' 0 0 CONCRETE INLET TYPE I WITH TYPE 1 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA =44 +65 35' LT GRATE ELEV= 2023.03 DRAINAGE EASEMENT 5' TYP POND BOTTOM ELEV.= 2022.53 BERM ELEV.= 2023.96 POND "B2" LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA • . ,• , v 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTILITY ESMT 15 LF OF 12" CMP @ 0.15 FT. /FT. IE(N)= 2020.53 IE(S)= 2018.28 SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & LID WITH SOUD COVER STA =44 +60 20.5' LT LID ELEV= 2023.78 CURB INLET TYPE 1 & TYPE 2 STA =44 +50 TC= 2023.76 LOT 2, BLOCK 4 RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION 10/30/95 ire 707 West 7th • Suite Spokane, WA 99204 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 200 (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 10' WIDE UTILITY ESMT CURB INLET TYPE 1 STA =45 +50 TC= 2024.46 SCALE: 1" =20' POND "C1" LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA W Z g _ N � r co `J . i � 1 5' TYP 101.91, Z. 6 V _ /�� DRAINAGE EASEMENT „S / 26 .0 0 % : --/ / POND BOTTOM ELEV.= 2023.63 BERM ELEV.= 2024.66 1 LOT 5, BLOCK 2 RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION 10/30/95 1 rum INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 1 o3 cv ri POND "B2" 7 LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA DRAINAGE EASEMENT --- ---.,/ • CONCRETE INLET TYPE I WITH TYPE 1 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA =44 +65 35' LT GRATE ELEV= 2023.03 15 LF OF 12" CMP .•• :: , / ® 0.15 FT. /FT. ..��� /'•,' 1E01)=2020.53 �( /S IE(S)= 2018.28 / \ SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & LID WITH SOLID COVER STA =44 +60 20.5' LT LID ELEV= 2023.78 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT ` SCALE: 1" =20' LOT 3, BLOCK 4 RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION • ` 10/30/95 CURB INLET TYPE 1 & TYPE 2 STA =44 +50 TC= 2023.76 POND BOTTOM ELEV.= 2022.53 BERM ELEV.= 2023.96 1 1 rim INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 Spokane, WA 99204 10' WIDE UTILITY ESMT SCALE: 1" =20' SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD CURB INLET TYPE 1 —� , TYPE "B" WITH • TYPE 4 METAL AL F FRA RAME & GRATE • �O�ry / i p N STA =44 +60 22.5' LT / \t./ / �, GRATE ELEV= 2023.03 • \ / , / 5' (TYP) • O� /i, /% / S v / /. <,\�o /4 ,o / • .• \r / / \t • \ • \ / 7 / \ •• v / 4 P/ �— DRAINAGE EASEMENT G cor6 POND BOTTOM ELEV.= 2022.53 BERM ELEV.= 2023.96 POND "C2" LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA LOT 2, BLOCK 2 RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION 10/30/95 INLAND . . IC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 SCALE: 1" =20' 'O DRAINAGE EASEMENT / / / / / • / / i / i � 1 / / / / / // / / / / • / // / / j / / � / / i / POND BOTTOM ELEV.= 2023.63 EXPIRES 9/24/ BERM ELEV.= 2025.06 � 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTILITY ESMT 1 1 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 3RD ADDTION 1 0/ 30 /9 5 J 1 'MN • INLAND iniC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 Spokane, WA 99204 CURB INLET TYPE 1 STA =44 +50 TC= 2023.76 i /, SCALE: 1" =20' 5' (TYP) POND "C2" LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA DRAINAGE EASEMENT SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA =44 +60 22.5' LT GRATE ELEV= 2023.03 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT POND BOTTOM ELEV. = 2022.53 BERM ELEV.= 2023.96 LOT 3, BLOCK 2 RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION DATE: 10/03/95 1 INLAND IC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 1 10' WIDE UTILITY ESMT Lt1 Z 5 CURB INLET TYPE 1—N STA =45 +50 TC= 2024.46 SCALE: 1" =20' EXPIRES 9/24/7 POND "C1" LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA 26.00' s r Q' Wi u:: it 1 J J 5' TYP DRAINAGE EASEMENT 101 .91. POND BOTTOM ELEV.= 2023.63 BERM ELEV.= 2024.66 LOT 4, BLOCK 2 RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION 10/30/95 I 11.111.11 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 MIN ROAD . EASEMENT LIMITS 17.5' 15.5' PAVED WIDTH 35' ROAD EASEMENT 15.5' PAVED WIDTH 0.0200 FT ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS UTILITY EASEMENT 10' NOTES SIDEWALK (ONE SIDE ::)NLY) 2" ,.ASS "B" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3 47 TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" CRUSHED SURF ,CING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH T. SPECIFICATIONS. BORDER, , IDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMEN SIDEWALK (ONE SIDE ONLY) ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS 18' PAVED WIDTH 1) ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE "SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION 1995 ", AND AS AMENDED. LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN IN THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR. SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. ANY CONFLICTING UTILITIES SHALL BE RELOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A COMPLETE SET OF THE APPROVED ROAD AND DRAINAGE PLANS ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DISCOVERS ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE PLANS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF DRYWELLS, INSTALL FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) BETWEEN THE DRYWELL BARREL AND THE WASHED DRAINROCK, AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAINROCK AND THE NATIVE SOILS. TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION MICHIELLI LANE N.T.S. PRIOR TO SITE CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. CALL THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATION SERVICE AT 456 -8000 BEFORE YOU DIG. 50' ROAD EASEMENT TYPICAL CROSS— SECTION SALMON RIVER LANE N.T.S. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE AN EFFORT TO PROTECT ALL CATCH BASINS AND DRYWELLS FROM BEING CONTAMINATED WITH SILT BY INSTALLING FILTER FABRIC OVER THE METAL FRAME DURING THE INSTALLATION AND KEEPING IT IN PLACE UNTIL THE STREETS HAVE BEEN PAVED AND CLEANED. THE STREET FRONTAGE OF ALL LOTS SHALL BE GRADED WITH A TEMPORARY CUTOFF SWALE AS SHOWN ON THIS PAGE. ALL DRYWELL CONNECTION PIPES SHALL BE PLACED BELOW THE DRYWELL CONCRETE CAP AND SHALL FLOW AS DIRECTED IN THE PLANS. 2" CLASS "B" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. 10) FOR ANY CURB GRADES LESS THAN 0.8% (0.0080FT. /FT.), A WASHINGTON STATE - LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE CURB FORMS ARE AT THE GRADES NOTED ON THE APPROVED PLANS, PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF CURB MATERIAL. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING AND COORDINATING WORK WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR. SPOKANE COUNTY ROLLED CURB BACK OF TYPE "B" CURB, ROLLED CURB OR SIDEWALK ON PLANS ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS' 25' C/L 25' BORDER & UTILITY EASEMENT SPO. CO. STD. TYPE "R" CURB (ROLLED CURB) DEV OP : R'S APPROVAL 2 ' 5' TYPICAL TEMPORARY CUTOFF SWALE STREET PLANS FOR RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION SEC 8, T.25N., R.45E., W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON DATE TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER SHEET SALMON RIVER LANE MICHIELLI LANE DETAILS POND DETAILS SHEET 1 SHEEP 2 SHEET 3 SHEET 4 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25 50 4" BASE COURSE ON 8" SUBBASE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT SPECIFICATIONS. 24' SEWER EASEMENT TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD SWALE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WHEN THE CURBS ARE BACKFILLED AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. THE SWALES SHOULD BE GRADED OUT WITH FINE GRADING IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO SEEDING OR PLACEMENT OF SOD. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 456 -8000 7 C/L SEWER 1 i ( APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT i 7 i -- 2 \ i _ i _ � \ is C J TEMPORARY TURN- AROUND EASEMENT ■ 1 1 1 1 INDEX MAP VICINITY MAP APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT L_ THE DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN IN THIS SET OF PLANS AND CALCULATIONS CONFORM TO APPLICABLE EDITIONS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION AND THE SPOKANE COUNTY GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. ALL DESIGN DEVIATIONS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER. I APPROVE THESE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION. • .L A A 0 a_ N z 0 W 0 co co tt o V (0 "4' Z I .. CC in 0 LU pU W © .. Z < U z ?o-uJ J to h. TOP LEFT CURB 2020 C/L 2020 2030 TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 - o.do8o EXIST, I i `027.52 k TOP OF CUR } N 5' CURB TRANSITION 0.0080 PAVEMENT EXL, TOP OF C:RU (' - 0 0.0200 N tri N 0 0 N N - 0.0060 VC CURB TRANSITION 5' CURB TRANSITION U) 11 0 0 0 - 0.0060 EXISTING GROUND CURB INLET TYPE 1 311+39.02 T= 2024.86 FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE TOP LEFT CURB 2020 TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 2030 TOP LEFT CURB 2020 TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 -0.0080 FINISHED GRADE - 0.0080 ' GRADE FINISHED GRADE - 0.0080 - 0.0080 o.008q EXISTING' GROUND 2030 TOP _ RIGHT I CURB °z 2020 2030 TOP LEFT CURB 2020 C/L 2020 +0.0080 +0.0080 EXISTING +0.00 CURVE 30 +00 5;=i MON RIVER LANE � DATUM APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED AT IRRIGATION DISTRICT ® 924 -3655 TENTION BOB ASHCRAFT SEE ISLAND DETAIL REFER TO THE BENCHMARK DESCRIBED ON SHEET 1A OF 13 IN THE RIVERWALK SEWER EXTENSION PLANS APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY MAY 16, 1995. / 1/6' SIDEWALK .& - /UTILITY EASEMENT N29•59'43" W J I T " B*71.00' 10' UTILITY EASMENT 1 CURVE INFORMATION RADIUS 1 LENGTH 1 TANGENT 1 CHORD 1 DELTA 1 67.50' 201.96' 115.30' 189.95' 69 °04'58" 20.00' 31.42' 20.00' 28.28' 90'00'00" * CURVE INFORMATION REFERS TO BACK OF CURB SEE RIGHT SEE RIGHT APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATE IRRIGATION DISTRICT ® 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT POND A2 NOTE: THIS PLAN MAY NOT SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE EXISTENCE AND ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 31 +78.52 SALMON RIVER LANE = 43 +04.56 MICHIELLI LANE GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25 50 INTERSECTION DETAIL 30 +45 2026.25 TC ISLAND DETAIL 1" =20' INTERSECTION DETAIL 0 >O 0 O (0 11) �' + + N + N M N M N 7 M 31 +41 2025.54 TC 42 +04.23 DEVEL - TEMPORARY SEWER ACCESS GRAVEL ROAD 31 +78.52 SALMON RIVER LANE POND B1 'S APPROVAL L= 11.86' 50.14' -52.67' TEMPORARY SEWER ACCESS GRAVEL ROAD DETAIL N09 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION UNE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT � '-46 +58.85 10' UTILITY EASMENT - REFER TO TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION OF GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD ON SHEET 1 147.47' 47+19.59= CEN C ` -PLAT BOUNDARY TEMPORARY GRAVEL TUR ! 4 47 +64.59 TURN - AROUND DETAIL 46 +83.70 2025.0 46 +60.11 2025.0 \ 46 +59:99 / 2025.0 46 +83.82 2025.0 TEMPORARY GRAVEL 47+19.59 / 2024.9 47+19.27 2025.8 47+19.59 2024.9 47 +64.27 2026.2 CONSTRUCT WHEELCHAIR RAMP PER SPOKANE COUNTY STD. A -5 CONSTRUCT SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE "A" CURB PER STD. A -3 INSTALL STREET AND. STOP SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY AND M.U.T.C.D. STANDARDS INSTALL STREET SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY AND M.U.T.C.D. STANDARDS INSTALL SPOKANE COUNTY CURB INLET TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 PER STDS. B -8 AND B -9 STA =31 +39.02 LT. TEMPORARY TURN - AROUND EASEMENT CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 456 -8000 CC c w J 15. z < a < z z y 0 0 SHEET 2 or 4 JOB NUMBER 95618 TOP LEFT CURB 2020 C/L 2020 2030 TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 - o.do8o EXIST, I i `027.52 k TOP OF CUR } N 5' CURB TRANSITION 0.0080 PAVEMENT EXL, TOP OF C:RU (' - 0 0.0200 N tri N 0 0 N N - 0.0060 VC CURB TRANSITION 5' CURB TRANSITION U) 11 0 0 0 - 0.0060 EXISTING GROUND CURB INLET TYPE 1 311+39.02 T= 2024.86 FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE TOP LEFT CURB 2020 TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 2030 TOP LEFT CURB 2020 TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 -0.0080 FINISHED GRADE - 0.0080 ' GRADE FINISHED GRADE - 0.0080 - 0.0080 o.008q EXISTING' GROUND 2030 TOP _ RIGHT I CURB °z 2020 2030 TOP LEFT CURB 2020 C/L 2020 +0.0080 +0.0080 EXISTING +0.00 CURVE 30 +00 5;=i MON RIVER LANE � DATUM APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED AT IRRIGATION DISTRICT ® 924 -3655 TENTION BOB ASHCRAFT SEE ISLAND DETAIL REFER TO THE BENCHMARK DESCRIBED ON SHEET 1A OF 13 IN THE RIVERWALK SEWER EXTENSION PLANS APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY MAY 16, 1995. / 1/6' SIDEWALK .& - /UTILITY EASEMENT N29•59'43" W J I T " B*71.00' 10' UTILITY EASMENT 1 CURVE INFORMATION RADIUS 1 LENGTH 1 TANGENT 1 CHORD 1 DELTA 1 67.50' 201.96' 115.30' 189.95' 69 °04'58" 20.00' 31.42' 20.00' 28.28' 90'00'00" * CURVE INFORMATION REFERS TO BACK OF CURB SEE RIGHT SEE RIGHT APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATE IRRIGATION DISTRICT ® 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT POND A2 NOTE: THIS PLAN MAY NOT SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE EXISTENCE AND ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 31 +78.52 SALMON RIVER LANE = 43 +04.56 MICHIELLI LANE GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25 50 INTERSECTION DETAIL 30 +45 2026.25 TC ISLAND DETAIL 1" =20' INTERSECTION DETAIL 0 >O 0 O (0 11) �' + + N + N M N M N 7 M 31 +41 2025.54 TC 42 +04.23 DEVEL - TEMPORARY SEWER ACCESS GRAVEL ROAD 31 +78.52 SALMON RIVER LANE POND B1 'S APPROVAL L= 11.86' 50.14' -52.67' TEMPORARY SEWER ACCESS GRAVEL ROAD DETAIL N09 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION UNE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT � '-46 +58.85 10' UTILITY EASMENT - REFER TO TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION OF GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD ON SHEET 1 147.47' 47+19.59= CEN C ` -PLAT BOUNDARY TEMPORARY GRAVEL TUR ! 4 47 +64.59 TURN - AROUND DETAIL 46 +83.70 2025.0 46 +60.11 2025.0 \ 46 +59:99 / 2025.0 46 +83.82 2025.0 TEMPORARY GRAVEL 47+19.59 / 2024.9 47+19.27 2025.8 47+19.59 2024.9 47 +64.27 2026.2 CONSTRUCT WHEELCHAIR RAMP PER SPOKANE COUNTY STD. A -5 CONSTRUCT SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE "A" CURB PER STD. A -3 INSTALL STREET AND. STOP SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY AND M.U.T.C.D. STANDARDS INSTALL STREET SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY AND M.U.T.C.D. STANDARDS INSTALL SPOKANE COUNTY CURB INLET TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 PER STDS. B -8 AND B -9 STA =31 +39.02 LT. TEMPORARY TURN - AROUND EASEMENT CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 456 -8000 CC c w J 15. z < a < z z y 0 0 SHEET 2 or 4 JOB NUMBER 95618 TOP OF BERM ELEV.= TOP OF CURB ELEV. +.20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN .9' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER LINE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST CURB DROP TO THE POND R/W 3 MAX. .`1] 1 NORMAL GUTTER LINE ROLLED CURB GRATE ELEVATION ` _ t. 3 MAX. .50' 18" TOP OF TYPE B" CURB FLOW LINE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE --- , WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS NOTES: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. TYPE "B" CURB 5' TRANSITION TYPE " R" " CURB FLOW LINE PLAN VIEW 5' TRANSITION PROFILE VIEW CURB TRANSITION DETAIL TYPE "B" CURB TO TYPE "R" CURB 1 NTS TYPICAL '208' POND SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) 4" 1 4" 10" TOP OF TYPE "R" CURB 4" THICK P.C.C. GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE CONCRETE CURB OR CURB & GUTTER AS SPECIFIED IN PLANS /A / /.. // CONCRETE APRON TROWEL EDGES WITH 1 /4" RADIUS EDGER (TYP) BROOM FINISH NORMAL GUTTER FLOWLINE ELEVATION TYPE "B" CURB & GUTTER SECTION TYPE "B" CURB & GUTTER ASPHALT PAVEMENT DROPPED GUTTER LINE 2" 3:1 (TYP) NORMAL GUTTER FLOWLINE ELEVATION DROPPED GUTTER LINE TYPE "R" CURB 4:1 (TYP 4" THICK P.C.C. TOP OF BERM ELEV.= TOP OF CURB ELEV. + 0.20' 2' TYPICAL / / \\ / >// / /.\ � /\ / PLAN SECTION VIEW 4' LONG DROP (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) CURB INLET TYPE 1 3 MAX. 2' TYPICAL (NOT TO SCALE) DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN .5' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER LINE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST CURB DROP TO THE POND GUTTER LINE DROPPED GUTTER L GRATE ELEVATION 3 MAX. J1 NE .50' TYPICAL '208' POND SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) APRON cV 4" THICK P.C.C. ASPHALT PAVEMEN R/W NORMAL GUTTER 4:1 (TYP) GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE SECTION ROLLED NE CURB TYPE "R" CURB 77777777777 /// //// CONCRETE APRON ?\\,\ 4" THICK P.C.C. DEVE OP R'S APPROVAL DATE W 0) 0 0 0 6 a m 0 0) z 0 w 0 00 (O 0 I CO la CO tt 1 cr U (1) c 2w �. Z LL Z S < U . Z ZO (/) . C73 rn SHEET 3 OF JOB NUMBER 95618 WIDE SIDEWALK & - ILITY EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY' 6' SIDEWALK SALMON RIVER CONCRETE INLET TYPE I WITH TYPE 1 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA=31+25 42' LT. GRATE ELEV= 2024.13 5' TYP , BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA (o DRAINAGE EASEMENT -- -- 1,° 35.00' 59.02' SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & LID WITH SOLID COVER STA=31+25 28' LT LID ELEV= 2025.14 i� ►� -J W CURB INLET TYPE 1 0 & TYPE 2 STA =31 +39.02 TC= 2024.86 CURB INLET TYPE 1 & TYPE 2 STA =43 +00 TC= 2024.86 DEVELOP R'S ' APPROVAL POND BOTTOM POND BOTTOM PERIMETER = TOP OF BERM ELEV = 2023.63 AREA = 490 S.F. 98 L.F. = 2025.06 35.00' \t> DATE 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT POND "B1" BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA POND BOTTOM ELEV = 2024.03 POND BOTTOM AREA = 525 S.F. PERIMETER = 100 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2025.06 POND "C2" ELEV = 2022.5 AREA = 639.2' S. 105.3 L.F. = 2023.96 POND BOTTOM POND BOTTOM PERIMETER = TOP OF BERM DRAINAGE ;EASEMENT t BOUNDARY OF ;LEVEL -� FLAT BOTTOM ,'`AREA SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE " B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & LID WITH SOLID COVER STA =44 +60 20.5' LT LID ELEV= 2023.78 2 15 LF OF 12" CMP @ 0.15 FT. /FT. IE(N)= 2020.53 IE(S)= 2018.28 \ \ CONCRETE INLET TYPE I WITH TYPE 1 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA =44 +65 35' LT GRATE ELEV= 2023.03 POND "B2" CURB INLET TYPE 1 & TYPE 2 STA= 44+ 50 TC= 2023.76 CURB INLET TYPE 1 STA =44 +50 TC= 2023.76 0 ,o\ \ . d 5'TYP �O' °/O \ AoO \ \ / U SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE " B" DRYWELL WITH \ TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA =44 +60 22.5' RT. GRATE ELEV= 2023.03 BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA DRAINAGE EASEMENT POND BOTTOM ELEV = 2022.53 POND BOTTOM AREA = 573.8 S.F. PERIMETER = 108 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2023.96 BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA DRAINAGE EASEMENT 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT CURB INLET TYPE 1 STA= 45 +50. TC= 2024.46 POND BOTTOM ELEV = 2023.63 POND BOTTOM AREA = 333.6 S.F. PERIMETER = 73.7 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2024.66 RIGHT OF WAY • SHEET 4 OF JOB NUMBER 95618 GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 UNDISTURBED EARTH (TYP) ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. LOCATION OF THRUST BLOCKS (FOR FITTINGS WITHOUT DIRECTLY ATTACHED VALVES, PLUGS, OR BLIND FLANGES) 8" END CAP 2" FLUSHING POINT DEVEL•'' ER S APPROVAL PLAT BOUNDARY 0 100 16' SIDEWALK & UTIUTY EASEMENT BEARING AREA PER TABLE (TYP) APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. E6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT ® 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT 1 WATER MAIN (SIZE PER PLAN) 8" VALVE /‘ DATE 3" MIN. N.T.S. FINISHED ROAD GRADE • • TYPICAL SECTION 6" A.C. LINE TO BE ABANDONED\ NO ROCKS LARGER THAN 12" DIAMETER NO ROCKS LARGER THAN 4" DIAMETER BEDDING —CLEAN GRANULAR SAND GRAVEL 3/4" OR SMALLER L ti 8" TEE 4" CONDUIT 461 111.41 ===1 4" NIPPLE WATER MAIN 6" NIPPLE PLAN VIEW I� ) DOUBLE STRAP SADDLE 3' 1" 2" FLUSHING POINT 8" END CAP ,REMOVE EXIST. 8" END CAP " & : ,CONNECT + TO EXIST. 8" W.M. 0 T 6" A.C. LINE TO BE ABANDONED SWING JOINT 1 1/2" GALVANIZED IRON PIPE ELEVATION TYPICAL STEEL STRAP INSTALLATION (FOR VALVES, TEES, OR CROSSES WITH DIRECTLY ATTACHED VALVES, PLUGS, OR BLIND FLANGES) # REBAR FOR 6" AND 8" PIPE #6 FOR 10" AND 12" PIPE CAST IRON VALVE BOX PAVEMENT MJ x MJ x FLG. TEE OR TAP SLEEVE 0 6" FLG. x MJ RSGV W/ MEGA —LUG GLAND 2" OPER. NUT 1 1/2" PROPERTY LINE OR BACK OF SIDEWALK DOUBLE SERVICE DETAIL N.T.S. CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK W/ 4" PVC SLEEVE FLUSHING POINT STANDARD CAST IRON STREET BOX --•- 2' TAPPED CAST IRON END CAP (MJ) SWING JOINT FLUSHING POINTS IN ASPHALT TOP SECTION ONLY 2" THREADED END W/ 2" CAP 2" GALVANIZED PIPE 4" FROM SURFACE 2" MUELLER MARK 11 STOP AND WASTE N.T.S. BEARING AREA PER TABLE (TYP) • NOTES; 1. ALL PIPING TO BE GALVANIZED IRON PIPE. SINGLE SERVICE LINE ALL 1" PIPING AND FITTINGS. . 200 PSI PE PIPE MAY BE SUBSTITUTED (I.P.S.) TAP AT MAIN APPROX. +30' APPROVED ADAPTERS FOR PE TO STEEL. -- END VIEW NOTE: IF PLASTIC MAIN, USE S.S. 304 ROMAC SADDLE OR EQUAL. TAP WITH APPROVED SHALL CUTTER ONLY. MEGA —LUG GLAND 1 : 1 /2" x 1 1/2" x 1 1/2" TEE W/ 1 1/2" x 1" BUSHINGS 1" MUELLER CURB STOP & DRAIN BOTH SIDES (ORISEAL) 6" DUCTILE IRON 12" x 12" x 4" PIPE CL 50 CONCRETE PAD 7 PROPERTY LINE 3 CUBIC FT. DRAIN ROCK TYPICAL FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 6" THREE (3) PORT MJ FIRE HYDRANT W/ DUC —LUG GLAND NOTES; 1. HYDRANT SHALL BE TRAFIC MODEL. 2. ALL VALVES SHALL OPEN COUNTER— CLOCKWISE. HYDRANT BRAND MUST BE APPROVED BY C.I.D. ANY DEVIATION MUST BE 1 APPROVED CONCRETE BLOCKING REWIRED IF MORE THAN ONE SECTION OF PIPE USED. BY CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT (C.I.D.) WATER PLAN FOR RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 SECTI0N 8, T.25N., R.45E., W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTO\ SHEET 1 OF 1 WATER SUPPLIER CERTIFICATION STATEMENT A. Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19 with State Identification Number 10220T has approved this water plan for RIVERWALK, PHASE II. This water plan will satisfy our needs in providing an adequate water system and facilities for domestic and fire protection for all parcels in the above named plan. B. Appropriate contractual arrangements or agreements have been made with - Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19 for construction of the water system in accordance with this approved water . plan. Said contractual arrangements include a time schedule acceptable to Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19 and commit the sponsor to installation of inspected service lines to each lot prior to any application for building permits for such lots. FIRE DISTRICT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT Fire District No. 1 has approved this water plan for RIVERWALK, PHASE 11. This plan is in conformance with our requirements and will satisfy our needs in providing an adequate water system and facilities for fire protection purposes to all sites in the above named project. CAL GENERAL NOTES Signature Title WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH STATEMENT SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT STATEMENT The Washington State Department of Health has approved this water plan as having met all applicable State reg rements. I d SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS Date Signature Title V Date The Spokane County Department of Buildings has approved this water plan as having met all applicable County. Building and Safety requirements. �S•?a r afY /aQ g tfe Title Date 1. ALL MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THESE PLANS, CONSOUDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT STANDARDS AND APPLICABLE PORTIONS OF AWWA AND APWA. The Spokane County Health District has ` approved this water plan' as having met all applicable County District requirements. i.i2. 4J) op... Signature Title ! Date DOUBLE WATER SERVICES SHALL CONSIST OF A SADDLE TAP, SWING JOINT AND 1-1/2" GALVANIZED OR 200 PSI P.E. PIPE DOUBLE SERVICE EXTENSION. INDIVIDUAL SERVICES SHALL BE 1" AND INCLUDE A MUELLER " ORISEAL" STOP AND WASTE. ALL THE HYDRANT VALVES SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE MAIN. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CL 150 PVC, ASTM C900, INSTALLED WITH TRACER WIRE, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ALL WATER UNES SHALL BE CHLORINATED AND TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT AND AWWA STANDARDS. THRUST BLOCKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF 3000 LBS. CONCRETE, REST ON A MINIMUM OF FOUR (4) SQUARE FEET OF UNDISTURBED EARTH AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL JOINTS AND FITTINGS. LOCATION OF EXISTING WATER MAINS & SERVICES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY AND BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CONSOLIDATED WATER DISTRICT. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOACATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING WATER UNES SHALL REMAIN IN SERVICE UNTIL SYSTEM IS TESTED, APPROVED, AND CONNECTED TO NEW UNE. NEW WATER UNE SHALL BE TESTED AT 150 PSI FOR ONE (1) HOUR. 1 - INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 BEFORE YOU DIG 456 -8000 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 50 100 BEFORE YOU DIG 456 -8000 "L'e Pte; 'S) -- -- \ 20 �- \� .7 1 fl 1 v.. f2'0 ,� , • �- \� Iii ‘ \).....,,.,-\,‘ )-i • F � ` \ • \ r\ I lv 1 i 0 0 INSTALL STREET AND STOP SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY AND M.U.T.C.D. STANDARDS INSTALL STREET SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY AND M.U.T.C.D. STANDARDS INSTALL W.S.D.O.T. TYPE 3 BARRICADE / ,. 0 z a vw z z - � ?o ly 03 (0 o'1 • t co ( s W o x 0 N J z 0 H 0 0 0 Z CNI z CL L 1) 4) SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT 1 10' 16' 5' MIN. SIDEWALK (ONE SIDE ONLY) 2" CLASS "B" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" CRUSHED ROCK TOP COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. BORDER, SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT 7 NOTES 10' 18' 5' ttiffilarenem MIN. SIDEWALK (ONE SIDE ONLY) 6' ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS 17.5' 15.5' PAVED WIDTH 0.0200 FT. /FT• 25' 18' PAVED WIDTH .0200 FT. FT ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE "SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION 1995 ", AND AS AMENDED. TYPICAL CROSS — SECTION SALMON RIVER LANE N.T.S. LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN IN THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES. ANY CONFLICTING UTILITIES SHALL BE RELOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A COMPLETE SET OF THE APPROVED ROAD AND DRAINAGE PLANS ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF DRYWELLS, INSTALL FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) BETWEEN THE DRYWELL BARREL AND THE WASHED DRAINROCK, AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAINROCK AND THE NATIVE SOILS. PRIOR TO SITE CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. CALL THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATION SERVICE AT 456 -8000 BEFORE YOU DIG. 35' ROAD EASEMENT IF THE CONTRACTOR DISCOVERS ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE PLANS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE. C/L THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE AN EFFORT TO PROTECT ALL CATCH BASINS AND DRYWELLS FROM BEING CONTAMINATED WITH SILT BY INSTALLING FILTER FABRIC OVER THE METAL FRAME DURING THE INSTALLATION AND KEEPING IT IN PLACE UNTIL THE STREETS HAVE BEEN PAVED AND CLEANED. 50' ROAD EASEMENT THE STREET FRONTAGE OF ALL LOTS SHALL BE GRADED WITH A TEMPORARY CUTOFF SWALE AS SHOWN ON THIS PAGE. C/L 46' ALL DRYWELL CONNECTION PIPES SHALL BE PLACED BELOW THE DRYWELL CONCRETE CAP AND SHALL FLOW AS DIRECTED IN THE PLANS. 10' ISLAND 5 ' 5' TYPICAL CROSS — SECTION SALMON RIVER LANE N.T.S. STA. 30 +00 TO 31+78.52 10) FOR ANY CURB GRADES LESS THAN 0.8% (0.0080FT. /FT.), A WASHINGTON STATE — LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE CURB FORMS ARE AT THE GRADES NOTED ON THE APPROVED PLANS, PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF CURB MATERIAL. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING AND COORDINATING WORK WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR. 17.5' 15.5' PAVED WIDTH 0.0200 FT. /FT. 25' .0200 FT. /FT. 2" CLASS "B" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" CRUSHED ROCK TOP COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. SPOKANE COUNTY ROLLED CURB 18' PAVED WIDTH 1 BACK OF TYPE "B" CURB, ROLLED CURB OR SIDEWALK ON PLANS ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS 5' MIN. ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS 5 M IN. UTILITY EASEMENT 10' . BORDER & UTILITY EASEMENT 12' �—SPO. CO. STD. TYPE "R" CURB (ROLLED CURB) a • DEV OPER'S APPROVAL 5:1TP 5:1 1.0' TYPICAL TEMPORARY CUTOFF SWALE STREET PLANS FOR RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION SEC 8, T.25N., R.45E., W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON R DATE TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER SHEET SALMON RIVER LANE DETAILS POND DETAILS SHEET 1 SHEET 2 SHEET 3 SHEET 4 7 .0200 4" BASE COURSE ON 8" SUBBASE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT SPECIFICATIONS. 24' SEWER EASEMENT TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD t \c: -' 00, \ \ ' \ SWALE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WHEN THE CURBS ARE BACKFILLED AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. THE SWALES SHOULD BE GRADED OUT WITH FINE GRADING IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO SEEDING OR PLACEMENT OF SOD. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 456 -8000 4 .0200 1 ..7 46/ C/L SEWER r GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6' A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT 100 i :-/ \ st 1 ��\ v 7- \ "> P P /' % \ / /F'' \ P \J / /: J�\ /. \ / 4.-- \ �P \ ' V \ .\ \ / J / / ' \ INDEX Post tiles � u• � • ■ M OM CAW An. ,- ��� ■ . 1. • ▪ / — • —� / / / / �� / MAP Green Acres ■ TEMPORARY TURN — AROUND EASEMENT 0. 1 i thin / GrWgAM / 7 ,A / / // /// ...-- \--- . — Eo,AE A,.. S PROJECT � LOCATIgN �R i let Ark a VICINITY MAP r r - _ .— • r r — t Mission Aw .. - — } r t-- Otis APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT Hem Are Orcllar (filt e CEIVED Oe - T 1 2 7995 �UNnFNGr Valley Vlew 3. Golf Course Sp oic44/440 \ �t I } Is Ep THE DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN IN THIS SET OF PLANS AND CALCULATIONS CONFORM TO APPLICABLE EDITIONS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION AND THE SPOKANE COUNTY GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. ALL DESIGN DEVIATIONS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER. I APPROVE THESE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION. l 0 rn I M 0 w o 0 Z it 0 ly z 0 0 _ W F- 0 0 0 N 0 i 1-- 1- 11 (0 1- 0) 0 u)� 0 (0 In r) (5 N uj o ui CNI 1-c•4 + CV .+c1 + DO 00 -0 - f) N M N M N .1 mow= LOW P POINT STA 4 4+50 EL= 0 023.76 11 (0 1- 0) 0 u)� 0 (0 In r) (5 N uj o ui CNI 1-c•4 + CV .+c1 + DO 00 -0 - f) N M N M N .1 2025.54 TC 31 +36= A7 Tt' �� - 'STINT 511:51/71.1c 13+00.51 INDIANA AVENUE>d 30+00 SALMON RIVER LANE ) 1 l I 2 < fop / )/ /li / III 0 '62 ID r , SEE ISLAND DETAIL CURVE INFORMATION CURVE RADIUS 1 LENGTH 1 TANGENT 1 CHORD 1 DELTA 189.95' 690458" C1 167.50' 201.96 115.30' * C10 20.00' 31.42' 20.00' 28.28' 90•00'00" * CURVE INFORMATION REFERS TO BACK OF CURB DATUM REFER TO THE BENCHMARK DESCRIBED ON SHEET 1A OF 13 IN THE RIVERWALK SEWER EXTENSION PLANS APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY MAY 16, 1995. 2030 TOP LEFT CURB 2020 2030 2030 TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOUDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924-3655 \ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT 03 tr) a) r EXIST. •oP OF CURB -0.0080 CN 0 29 w 0 0 0 b z '1 CURB III l 1 III 1 Illy 1 111 1 Ill o I Itc / : / / 11,'; 1 4 / / / 1 In 1,5. / / A' SIDEWALK .& - IA IliF, I / /UTILITY EASEMENT E / / / -/ ri AO \ , TRACT r IWO/ 411;aiinisfmgrimmunigrros.;: a) C4 C‘i - -- - T - 2027.52 ) L_; • u;'9 ow), co I J- ; 1 CV d) 0 CsA 1 CV I / 5' CUR p TRANSITION N N I -4- - PAVEMENT h te- i- C' 0 0 CV CV 14 EXIST. 20275_- TOP OF CORP 1.3 c' 4 N f TRANSITION to 0) 501 VC 501 VC u) + 0) 0) Lo C. TRACT N Er 71.00' 0 co 0) 0 0 0) 0 c'Ji CV 0-J r-, 0 0 CV CV 10' UTILITY- EASMENT - 0.0200 - 0.0200 tr) 30 f"5 N2959'43 W 0 0 LIJ z 0 0 ;d 0 UTL.JF<E 0 ro r 0, SALMON RIVER 31 LANE SEE RIGHT I/ ro tri (NJ 0 cv (...) I- LL ON r‘l N N 00 c» NIN to tri cv 50 VC w 0 / 1 (i) SEE RIGHT APPROXIMATE LOCA OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924-3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT -0.0060 501 VC ow- 33 0 11 t.) .. CURB TRANSITION to z 0) cri 0) N tri LE > z 0 3 ; POND A2 31 N Ifi If) in I CV II c\I 00 5 N 0 ('4 5' CURB TRANSITION 1 1 GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 - 0.0065 EXISTING GROUND II LO <- CO Tr) RI - 0.0060 EXISTING GROUND ct 0 0 NOTE: THIS PLAN MAY NOT SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE EXISTENCE AND ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 0 < ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. FINISHED GRADE 0 FINISHED GRADE INTERSECTION DETAIL f 2 c Pr) 31+78.52 SALMON RIVER LANE (N/S)= 43+04.56 SALMON RIVER LANE (E/W) 30+45 2026.25 TC NI MI NU IN NI 5'R 100 2030 TOP LEFT CURB 2020 C / L 2020 to 0 0 2030 TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 1" =20' T'o , LANE ISLAND DETAIL 1 6/ SALMON RIVER PV INTERSECTION DETAIL SEC. 8, T.25 N., R.45 E.,W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 2030 LEFT CURB 2020 2030 C/L 2020 2030 RIGHT CURB 2020 i0 0 CNI 8 0) N 6 \ 31+41 r 5'R 2025.54 TC 41 ctok \ • • \ \o' `s Vol so"' 0 1 c.D Lu _ CO Pr) oqi cp Z r ct ) 42 0 -0.0080 -0.0080 CK1 0 -FINISHED GRADE DEVE OP R'S APPROVAL - 45- - 916°1°.. - FIISHED GRADE cc (0 cc 110 (0 Lu Cti C O 1 0) - FIN,SHED GRADE TEMPORARY SEWER ACCESS GRAVEL ROAD 31+78.52 SALMON RIVER LANE (N/S) 1 4 0- 3 -0.0080 0 r4) 43 z 3/t PLAT BOUNDARY +04.56 SALMON RIVER LANE (E/W)= 400 /770N r- 0 P Nt" 0 4 POND B1 -0.0080 POND -0.008 44 TEMPORARY SEWER ACCESS 5 0 GRAVEL ROAD DETAIL 50 50 VC 50 VC VC 46 L11.86' 50.14' to + 0 -4- c\I ON (0 roj 4 52.67' NO9'04'41" 6 45 DATE 46+58.85 10' UTILITY EASM ENT EXISTIN REFER TO TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION OF GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD ON SHEET 1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION UNE. CALL CONSOUDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924-3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT 16' SPEWALK & UTILITY .EASMENT PLAT BOUNDARY +0.0080 +0.0080 147.47' XISTING GROUND 150.00' 46 TEMPORARY GRAVEL TUR AROUND 47+64.59 t2 0 IJ 46+83.70 02 .0 46+60.11 2025.0 6+59.99 2025.0 46+83.82 2025.0 TEMPORARY GRAVEL 47+19.27 2025.8 TURN-AROUND DETAIL 47 0 47+19.59 2024.9 47+64.27 2026.2 47+19.59 2024.9 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 0 CONSTRUCT WHEELCHAIR RAMP PER SPOKANE COUNTY STD. A-5 CONSTRUCT SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE "A■' CURB PER STD. A-3_ INSTALL STREET AND STOP SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY AND M.U.T.C.D. STANDARDS INSTALL STREET SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY AND M.U.T.C.D. STANDARDS INSTALL SPOKANE COUNTY CURB INLET TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 PER STDS. 8-8 AND B-9 STA=31+ 41 I-1-- TEMPORARY TURN-AROUND EASEMENT CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 464-8000 2030 LEFT CURB 2020 48 2030 El lien 1 2 1995 OUNTY ENGINE 1y 0 0 N O 00. MOONNIMI N SHEET 2 OF 4 JOB NUMBER 95618 1 RIVERWALK PLAT BOUND PVI 2025.84 TC REVISIONS 2025.69 TC TOP OF BERM ELEV.- PO LEV. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ---- -. ,� WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS NOTES: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE1' SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHE DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. TOP P tpA' ki (PP 1 F BERM ELEV.= ELEV. ,19.41, 3 MAX. 1 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ---�� WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS NOTES: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN .9' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER LINE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST CURB DROP TO THE POND ELEVATION TYPICAL '208' POND SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN .9' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER LINE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST CURB DROP TO THE POND GRATE E 3 MAX. TYPICAL '208' POND SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) R/W NORMAL TYPE "B" S GUTTER LINE CURB 4" THICK P.C.0 3:1 (TYP) GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE R/W NORMAL ROLLED 5 5 GUTTER LINE CURB 4" THICK P.C.C. 4:1 (TYP) GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE CONCRETE CURB OR CONCRETE APRON / A / / A, // CONCRETE APRON TROWEL EDGES WITH 1/4" RADIUS EDGER (TYP) —� BROOM FINISH CURB & GUTTER AS SPECIFIED IN PLANS 2' TYPICAL PLAN VIEW 4' LONG DROP (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) SECTION CURB INLET TYPE 1 (NOT TO SCALE) 2' TYPICAL APRON iv GUTTER LINE DROPPED GUTTER LINE ASPHALT PAVEMEN TOP OF TYPE "B" CURB SECTION ASPHALT PAVEMENT TYPE "B" CURB FLOW LINE NORMAL GUTTER FLOWLINE ELEVATION 18" 6" TYPE "B" CURB & GUTTER TYPE "R" CURB DROPPED GUTTER LINE 2" PLAN VIEW 5' TRANSITION PROFILE VIEW CURB TRANSITION DETAIL TYPE "6" CURB TO TYPE " R" CURB NTS TYPE "B" CURB & GUTTER 3:1 (TYP) NORMAL GUTTER FLOWLINE ELEVATION DROPPED GUTTER LINE TYPE "R" CURB 5' TRANSITION FLOW LINE 1 4" THICK P.C.C. -TYPE "R" CURB 14" 10" TOP OF TYPE "R" CURB 4 " DEVELOPER'S APPROVAL . < DATE R C OCT 12 1995 SPOKANE COUNrY knOti t:NGINEE m z 0 eJ z = " w z 0 w 0 o w 0 ce 0 SHEET 3 OF 4 JOB NUMBER 95618 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY 1 BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA DRAINAGE EASEMENT- --- 14 LF OF 12" CMP 0.15 FT. /FT. IE (W)= 2021.29 IE (E)= 2019.19 CONCRETE INLET TYPE I WITH, TYPE 2 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA=31+25 42' RT. GRATE ELEV= 2024.13 5' TYP SALMON RIVER LANE SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & LID WITH SOLID COVER STA=31+25 28' LT LID ELEV= 2025.14 DEVELOP ''S '*PPROVAL CURB INLET TYPE 1 & TYPE 2 STA =43 +00 TC= 2024.86 [b. .')-5 DATE POND "A2" POND BOTTOM ELEV = 2023.63 POND BOTTOM AREA = 490 S.F. PERIMETER = 98 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2024.83 CURB INLET TYPE 1 Q & TYPE 2 STA =31 +39.02 TC= 2024.86 ?a; 1 " =20' .r 7-_• -•• 35.0. 5.00' .._•• 5 / :O '` I 5 16' WIDE SIDEWALK Sc UTILITY EASEMENT 110' TRACT "C" ,;`✓ POND "B1" BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA POND BOTTOM ELEV - POND BOTTOM AREA = PERIMETER = 100 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2024. 83 POND "02" 2023.C3 y 525 S.F. DRAINAGE j /EASEMENT BOUNDARY OF /LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA POND BOTTOM ELEV = 2022.55 POND BOTTOM AREA = 639. ,2' S.F. PERIMETER = 105.3 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2023.7,3 2 " =20' RIGHT OF WAY -� i \ c2?, CURB INLET TYPE 1 & TYPE 2 STA =44 +50 TC= 2023.76 WITH SOLID COVER STA =44 +60 22.5' LT GRATE ELEV= 2023.03 \ 29° � • 1°J OO \ \ \ \ ° : \ \ 5' TYP /� / \ / u SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD 3 TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH N TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & GRATE \ SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & LID WITH SOLID COVER STA =44 +60 20.5' LT LID ELEV= 2023.78 2 15 LF OF 12" CMP CO 0.15 FT. /FT. IE(N)=2020.53 IE (S)= 2018.28 \ • \ A 5\ CURB INLET TYPE 1 STA =44 +50 TC= 2023.76 4 BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA v 9 •, 56,. \ •°°.\ • DRAINAGE EASEMENT -5' TYP 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT - P. CONCRETE INLET TYPE I WITH TYPE 2 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA =44 +65 35' LT GRATE ELEV= 2023.03 3 POND "B2" POND BOTTOM ELEV = 2022.53 POND BOTTOM AREA = 573.8 S.F. PERIMETER = 108 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2023.73 BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA DRAINAGE EASEMENT 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & JJT hL SIDE /ryo / 5'TYP ALK CURB INLET TYPE 1 STA =45 +50 TC= 2024.46 POND BOTTOM ELEV = POND BOTTOM AREA = 333.6 S.F. PERIMETER = 73.7 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2024.43 RIGHT OF WAY " 20' pows-b RECEIVED 0 C T 12 1995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER W EV° N Z O m w 0 rn p �m 0 03 ®0 0 0 0 2 c 2 Z 'LL Z <U z Z < W v CO CO It 00 CD' 1 in O � v O L 0 0 N SHEET 4 OF JOB NUMBER 95618 .601 :izt ' .011,-. 120• ;. • .011 c • r � .011x. N t0 ("•4 NI .6L M N O N {L 9 .0l l .oz L .OZ1� .OZ I\ X113' 26 ,cF 1 60' 1 10 60' 12 65' 101' 17. ctA &OF - /T 6 4 13 S 161' 16 ,9$ 70' _.20 140' Q 120' : (509) 458-6840 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 PUD PERIMETER SEITICK 25' MISSION AVENUE 10' LANDSCAPE TRACT 111 10' FUTURE AOoUION-j IT0 10 ADOIML R.O.W. 20' D351114 R.G.W. L 911'\76Y 70' 15 0 76' 1 70' b b 2 .- 3 4 71' 70' 1 71Y 70' CK RIVER LANE PUD PERIMETER REM YARD BLDG. SETBACK 25' 70° 82" 50' 7T 72A- - 7 72' 72' h � • �Lc 1 b 2 b 3 b ' 4 b g � ' 7 72' 7 �n� ' i S N 17 16N ' 15� 14N 13a 79' 7 '_ 72' 72' 4 72' 120' 2o2D OPEN SPACE INFORMATION TRACT "A" TRACT " B" TRACT "C" TRACT " D" TRACT 'T' TRACT " F" TRACT "G" TRACT " H" TRACT " TRACT "J" TRACT "K" TRACT " L" TRACT "M" TRACT " N" TRACT "0" TRACT " P" TRACT " Q" TRACT "R" TRACT " S' TRACT "T" TRACT " U" TRACT "V' TRACT "VY' TRACT " X" TRACT "Y' P.U.D. DATA TOTAL PUD AREA AREA OF ROADS NET DEVELOPABLE AREA TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS NET DENSITY GROSS DENSITY OPEN SPACE APPROVED ZONING EXISTING ZONING TYPICAL LOT SIZES: UTILITIES SANITARY SEWERS WATER SUPPLY ELECTRICITY NATURAL GAS TELEPHONE SOLID WASTE FIRE PROTECTION BUILDING SETBACK REAR YARD: PUD EAST AND WEST PERIMETER ALL INTERIOR LOTS SIDE YARD FLANKING STREET FRONT YARD: GARAGE HOME LIVING AREA 6.7 ACRES 1.4 ACRES 1.0 ACRES 0.1 ACRES 0.01 ACRES 0.2 ACRES 0.5 ACRES 0.1 ACRES 0.03 ACRES 0.05 ACRES 1.1 ACRES 0.02 ACRES 0.03 ACRES 0.03 ACRES 0.03 ACRES '1.8 ACRES 0.7 ACRES 1.4 ACRES 0.03 ACRES 0.2 ACRES 0.3 ACRES 0.05 ACRES 0.2 ACRES 2.5 ACRES 0.04 ACRES 107.3 ACRES 16.8 ACRES 90.5 ACRES 365 4.0 LOTS /ACRE 3.4 LOTS /ACRE 18.0 ACRES (17 %) UR 7 UR 3.5 60X110 (6,600 S.F.) 70X120 (8,400 S.F.) 65X140 (9,100 S.F.) PUBLIC (SPOKANE COUNTY) CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT #3 WASHINGTON WATER POWER WASHINGTON WATER POWER U.S. WEST VALLEY GARBAGE SERVICE FIRE DISTRICT #1 (SEE PLAT MAP) 25' 20' 5 15' FROM R/W GRAPHIC SCALE 200 0 100 200 400 SPONSOR Eud.d Ara. ROAD NAME INDIANA AVE. RIVERWALK LANE (WEST) RIVERWALK LANE (EAST) LITTLEWOOD LANE PLATTE RIVER LANE (WEST) SALMON RIVER LANE (NORTH) SALMON RIVER LANE (SOUTH) SNAKE RIVER LANE FLAT ROCK RIVER LANE TIPPE CANOE LANE ROGUE RIVER LANE CLARK FORK RIVER LANE BALDWIN LANE (WEST) BALDWIN LANE (EAST) '.IcMILLAN LANE `IARMONY LANE AUGUSTA LANE SANDUSKY RIVER LANE RIO GRANDE LANE YUKON RIVER LANE Post' Office PROPOSED ROADS STANTON DEVELOPMENT CO. 16720 N.E. 116th ST. REDMOND, WASHINGTON 98052 TELEPHONE (206) 869 -6618 UI,Uo An PROPOSED STATUS PUBLIC PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE Gtaldo A. Bro.wq An- I reel) Acres I tnd Ae� y K aihA... L CERT. NO. 18091 Eo Ik Av.. R.O.W. OR EASEMENT WIDTH 60' 35' 35' 35' 35' 35' 50' 35' 35' 35' 35' 35' 50' 35' THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. 1- Baldwin nor. - Augv.t. M A.. tnhAA.. VICINITY MAP TRAVEL WAY WIDTH 44' 24'(NOTE 28' 24'(NOTE 24'(NOTE 24'(NOTE 28' 28' 28' 28' 28' 28' 28' '28' 28' 28' 28' 28' 28' 28' EXPIRES 12 08 CURBS YES 2) YES YES 2) YES 2) YES 2) YES NO YES YES YES YES YES NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NOTE 1: 6' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO OR BEHIND CURBS ON BOTH SIDES. NOTE 2: 6' WIDE PEDESTRIAN PATH AND 24' WIDE TRAVELWAY COMBINED IN 30' WIDE PAVED SURFACE AND SEPERATED WITH PAINTED STRIPE. NOTE 3: 6' CONCRETE SIDEWALK BEHIND CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT ON ONE SIDE. REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPEMENT PLAN OF RIVERWALK (A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPEMENT) (FORMERLY RIVERWAY VILLA) LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 AND A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 8, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON APRIL 1995 SIDEWALKS NOTE 1 NOTE 2 NOTE 3 NOTE 2 NOTE 2 NOTE 2 NOTE 3 NOTE 3 NOTE 3 NOTE 3 NOTE 3 NOTE 3 NOTE 3 NOTE 3 NOTE 3 NOTE 3 NOTE 3 NOTE 3 NOTE 3 NOTE 3 RIGHT CURB 2020 DELTA C1 167.50' 201.96' 115.30' 20.00' 31.42' 20.00' 28.28' 90'00'00" CURVE INFORMATION CURVE 1 RADIUS 1 LENGTH 1 TANGENT I CHORD 95'1 / 1 ± / ) ! / 30 +00 SALMON RIVER LANE I I 1 f •.,. ` 1 :1) J 11. 1 111 f 1 t t.I gi I I I �// I /�il� 1� ' lu ] /11 / `I (I S-) Q SEE ISLAND DETAIL 13 +00.51 INDIANA AVENUE= 1 2030 TOP LEFT CURB 2020 * CURVE INFORMATION REFERS TO BACK OF CURB DATUM REFER TO THE BENCHMARK DESCRIBED ON SHEET 1A OF 13 IN THE RIVERWALK SEWER EXTENSION PLANS APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY MAY 16, 1995. 2030 TOP RIGHT CURB 1 2020 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924 -3655 `ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT - 0.0080 5' CURB TRANSITION - O. 0 080 EXIST. -P 9027.52 TOP OF C4)RB 50 VC - 0.0200 0 i . >; c.' I +1OS N l I �r r aal to; Lr�I II=~ I t f r1 1 N +IN 2030 1 5 0 �-� �� N , i I ;, j i t.d1c'� i J C/L E EXIST. I to I PAVEMENT I I Ir•i N I = 50 j VC - 0.0200 - O.C(080 1 0 ' 1 I u = I0) +IPA O c•J N. c) . D =ral 0 .-• 1 i cyiNI , ^. c 1 i +I 11iN N I cr, _ : °ice NIc 0 rai'. ❑_ICJ c.,..1 i i j N29'59'43 W �E PLA T TII\ SEE RIGHT APPROXIMATE LOCA7)N OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE, CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT C!'RB TRANSITION U :aa d' to t!7 L to +NN +Nc? 0 N 000 •O ] 0 tr N N N CJ 0_ N 51' CURB TRANSITION I NOTE: THIS PLAN MAY NOT SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE ONLY. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S TO VERIFY THE EXISTENCTACONSTRUCTIONLOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR O 31 +78.52 SALMON RIVER LANE (N /S) 43 +04.56 SALMON RIVER LANE (E /W) - 0.0060 EXISTING GROUND INTERSECTION DETAIL 30 +45 2026.25 TC 2030 TOP LEFT CURB 2020 INTERSECTION DETAIL ISLAND DETAIL 1" =20' 2030 LEFT CURB 2020 31 +41 2025.54 TC . - 1 TEMPORARY SEWER ACCESS GRAVEL ROAD 7 ,A PLAT BOUNDARY - 0.0080 FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE •'43 +04.56 SALMON RIVER LANE (E /W)= 31 +78.52 SALMON RIVER LANE (N /S) DEVE OP R'S APPROVAL - 0.0080 POND B1 - 0.0080 -0.008 _....52.67' N09'04'41" 1 DATE APPROXNATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 4'' 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT 46 +58.85 10' UTILITY EASMENT REFER TO TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION OF GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD ON SHEET 1 47 +1 CEN +0.0080 +0.0080 +0.0080 47.47' EXISTING GROUND TEMPORARY GRAVEL TUR AROUND 47 +64.59 46 +83.70 2025.0 46 +60.1 1 2025.0 46 +59.99 2025.0 46 +83.82 2025.0 TEMPORARY GRAVEL TURN- AROUND DETAIL CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCT WHEELCHAIR RAMP PER SPOKANE COUNTY STD. A -5 0 CONSTRUCT SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE " A" CURB PER STD. A -3 O3 INSTALL STREET AND STOP SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY AND M.U.T.C.D. STANDARDS INSTALL STREET SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY AND M.U.T.C.D. STANDARDS O5 INSTALL SPOKANE COUNTY CURB INLET TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 PER STDS. B -8 AND B -9 STA =31 +41 TEMPORARY TURN - AROUND EASEMENT BEFORE YOU DIG 456 -8000 47+19.59 2024.9 47+19.27 2025.8 47+19.59 2024.9 47 +64.27 2026.2 TOP OF BERM ELEV.= POND BOTTOM 'ELEV. + 1.20' 3 MAX. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ---- 1 .50' WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS . 4" THICK P.C.C. GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE NOTES: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. TOP OF BERM ELEV.= POND BOTTOM ELEV. + 1.20' DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ---� WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS NOTES: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BE THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN .9' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER LINE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST CURB DROP TO THE POND DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN .9' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER LINE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST CURB DROP TO THE POND GRATE ELEVATION NORMAL TYPE "B" 3 MAX. GUTTER LINE CURB 1 GRATE ELEVATION TYPICAL '208' POND SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) TYPICAL '208' POND SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) NORMAL ROLLED GUTTER LINE CURB 4:1 (TYP) 4" THICK P.C.C. GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE CONCRETE CURB OR CURB & GUTTER AS SPECIFIED IN PLANS BROOM FINISH /.. / /.. // CONCRETE APRON CONCRETE APRON 2' TYPICAL 4' LONG DROP (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) SECTION CURB INLET TYPE 1 (NOT TO SCALE) 2' TYPICAL GUTTER LINE DROPPED GUTTER LINE ASPHALT PAVEMEN NORMAL GUTTER FLOWLINE ELEVATION SECTION ASPHALT PAVEMENT TYPE "B" CURB TOP OF TYPE "B" CURB FLOW LI N E CURB TRANSITION DETAIL TYPE "B" CURB TO TYPE "R" CURB NTS TYPE "B" CURB & GUTTER TYPE "B" CURB & GUTTER SECTION TYPE "R" CURB 5' TRANSITION FLOW LINE PLAN VIEW 5' TRANSITION PROFILE VIEW DROPPED GUTTER LINE 2" NORMAL GUTTER FLOWLINE ELEVATION DROPPED GUTTER LINE TYPE "R" CURB 4" THICK P.C.C. 4" THICK P.C.C. TYPE "R" CURB TOR OF TYPE "R" CURB DEVELOPER'S APPROVAL 1,D.s3S)< DATE SHEET 3 of 4 JOB NUMBER 95618 I o i :o DRAINAGE EASEMENT-----'49, �¢ 1.6' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA 6' SIDEWALK SALMON RIVER CONCRETE INLET TYPE I WITH, TYPE 2 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA=31+25 42' RT. GRATE ELEV =2024.13 5' TYP -K 35.00' 59.02' SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & LID WITH SOLID COVER STA =31 +25 28' LT LID ELEV= 2025.14 CURB INLET TYPE 1 & TYPE.2 STA =31 +39.02 TC= 2024.86 CURB INLET TYPE 1 &TYPE 2 STA =43 +00 TC= 2024.86 DATE POND "A2" POND BOTTOM ELEV = 2023.63 POND BOTTOM AREA = 490 S.F. PERIMETER = 98 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2024.83 35.00' 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT TRACT POND "B1" POND BOTTOM ELEV = 8- POND BOTTOM AREA = 525 S.F. PERIMETER = 100 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2024.83 POND "02" RIGHT OF WAY —te i t DRAINAGE /EASEMENT BOUNDARY OF /LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM ;AREA POND BOTTOM ELEV = 2022.53 POND BOTTOM AREA = 639.7 S.F. PERIMETER = 105.3 L.F. / TOP OF BERM = 2023.73 • \ \ \ /� \ / SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE " B" DRYWELL WITH \ TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & GRATE WITH SOLID COVER STA =44 +60 22.5' LT • GRATE ELEV= 2023.03 CURB INLET TYPE 1 & TYPE 2 STA =44 +50 TC= 2023.76 SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & LID WITH SOLID COVER STA =44 +60 20.5' LT LID ELEV= 2023.78 2 CURB INLET TYPE 1 STA =44 +50 TC= 2023.76 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT r.. BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA DRAINAGE EASEMENT CONCRETE INLET TYP7. I WITH TYPE 2 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA =44 +65 35' LT GRATE ELEV= 2023.0:: BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA DRAINAGE EASEMENT POND "82" 5 POND "01" POND BOTTOM ELEV = POND BOTTOM AREA = 333.6 S.F. PERIMETER = 73.7 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2024.43 POND BOTTOM ELEV = 2022.53 1" =20' POND BOTTOM AREA = 573.8 S.F. PERIMETER = 108 LF. TOP CF BERM = 2023.73 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTILITY_. EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY (20) \ \ \ �\ / Iry \ \ �r5> \ / -� > . ,� \ y / air saw gm° 2026 . - \ \ -/' .i Sr■ % 2028 203 202 UN PLATTED ,' - 9.11 ACRES ,/ .rI 2029 r-- — 2030_ 203 2033 205 F b MISSION AVENUE y es • •NvI‘ - — — •—\ I c.f I I 1 I1 I _ L _ - — 1 11 I • I 2021 __ ... I I f...... I I. . . • J36 (8) ^Anir\I [>I [> I Anlr L J - ,iVt_ ' A T' A rt 11 IT I /l h I .V IJ. nt.)- IIVIY .•••••* \ f \�� \ 1 n e I • es es / I v I L >I' 1r A I i ' r L_I< 4 I cI I � I - - -`� LIi , IJJ (n 1 I 16,260 S.F. 7r-'\'f\ITI/1 nULJI I I\i/ V I 7 I I I ( 2) 1 r 2 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 50 100 20 33 20 '03 20 20 CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 456 -8000 ,t !ij 'd' oo (D co I oo co in Lt7 • O NI 0 0 N 0 (n N . a , a) i I SHEET 1 OF JOB NUMBER 95618 I3 SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT 16' ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS 2" CLASS " B" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. 35' ROAD EASEMENT 15.5' PAVED WIDTH 0.0200 FT. /FT. BORDER, SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT NOTES ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS - f•8& PAVED WIDTH VARIES SPO. CO. STD. TYPE B CURB & GUTTER 1) ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE "SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION 1995 ", AND AS AMENDED. LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN IN THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. ANY CONFLICTING UTILITIES SHALL BE RELOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A COMPLETE SET OF THE APPROVED ROAD AND DRAINAGE PLANS ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DISCOVERS ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE PLANS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE. 5) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF DRYWELLS, INSTALL FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) BETWEEN THE DRYWELL BARREL AND THE WASHED DRAINROCK, AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAINROCK AND THE NATIVE SOILS. 6) PRIOR TO SITE CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. CALL THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATION SERVICE AT 456 -8000 BEFORE YOU DIG. 50' ROAD EASEMENT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE AN EFFORT TO PROTECT ALL CATCH BASINS AND DRYWELLS FROM BEING CONTAMINATED WITH SILT BY INSTALLING FILTER FABRIC OVER THE METAL FRAME DURING THE INSTALLATION AND KEEPING IT IN PLACE UNTIL THE STREETS • HAVE BEEN PAVED AND CLEANED.. THE STREET FRONTAGE OF ALL LOTS SHALL BE. GRADED WITH A TEMPORARY CUTOFF SWALE AS SHOWN ON THIS PAGE. 10' ISLAND 5' 5' 9) ALL DRYWELL CONNECTION PIPES SHALL BE PLACED BELOW THE DRYWELL CONCRETE CAP AND SHALL FLOW AS DIRECTED IN THE PLANS. 10) FOR ANY CURB GRADES LESS THAN 0.8% (0.0080FT./FT.), A WASHINGTON STATE - LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE CURB FORMS ARE AT THE GRADES NOTED ON THE APPROVED PLANS, PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF CURB MATERIAL. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING AND COORDINATING WORK WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR. 17.5' -tea PAVED WIDTH VARIES VARIES "8'@9- FT. /FT. 2" CLASS "B" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. SPOKANE COUNTY ROLLED CURB TYPICAL CROSS - SECTION I SALMON RIVER LANE N.T.S. SEE SHEET 4AR FOR SALMON RIVER LANE BACK OF TYPE "B" CURB, ROLLED CURB OR SIDEWALK ON PLANS ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS BORDER & UTILITY EASEMENT 1. TOLERANCES FOR RECORD DRAWINGS: IN OUR PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT, ELEVATIONS THAT ARE WITHIN 0.05' OF DESIGNED ELEVATION ARE CONSIDERED TO BE BUILT AS DESIGNED. •• LENGTHS THAT ARE 0.10' OF DESIGNED LENGTH ARE CONSIDERED TO BUILT AS DESIGNED. IN THE EVENT THAT GREATER ACCURACY THAN THIS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR FUTURE DESIGNS OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, ADDITIONAL SURVEY INFORMATION SHOULD BE GATHERED. RECORD DRAWING I OR MY AGENT HAVE PERIODICALLY REVIEWED THE CONSTRUCTION AND TO MY KNOWLEDGE FIND IT TO BE IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED CERTIFIED PLANS AND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS NOTED 5:1 TYP 5:1 TYP 1 .0' TYPICAL TEMPORARY CUTOFF SWALE NOT CONSTRUCTED DUE TO IMMEDIATE HOUSE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITES AND /OR NATURAL GRADE. STREET PLANS FOR RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITION SEC 8, T.25N., R.45E., W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON EXPIRES 9/24/ .0200 24' SEWER EASEMENT SUBGRADE OF NATIVE GRAVELLY SOILS .0200 TYPICAL CROSS—SECTION GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD SWALE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WHEN THE CURBS ARE BACKFILLED AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE THROUGHOUT _ THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. THE- .SWALES SHOULD- BE. GRADED OUT WITH FINE GRADING IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO SEEDING OR PLACEMENT OF SOD. TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER SHEET SALMON RIVER LANE MICHIELLI LANE DETAILS POND DETAILS SHEET 1 SHEET 2 SHEET 3 SHEET 4 EPTH VARIES GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT � TEMPORARY TURN - AROUND EASEMENT INDEX MAP VICINITY MAP 4.� 41° COUN INE S � QO � 5 OFFICIAL PUBLIC ENG DOCUMENT c ( • ORIGINAL "AS- BU !ITS" CERTIFIED RECORD DRAWINGS : " DATE OJECT ACC 1 9Ga EPTED: Q f g ! \ « _ t APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT /c7 - � i,. m /14 Z 0 0 0 J = <C cn W Er 0 0 cc z SHEET 1 R of 4R JOB NUMBER 95618 I o LOW POINT STA 44 +50 EL= 2023.76 I o U J1 GY `.IGV4 =9£+ IT Ol b5'SZOZ M to o N t r th T LBif•�! 0 H Q N - EXISTING 6r 13 +00,51 INDIANA AVENUE 30 +00 SALMON RIVER LANE $ DATUM \ I t ' I V APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6' A.C. IRRIGATION UNE. CALL CONSOUDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT • 0 924 -3655 . i,TIENTION BOB ASHCRAFT I II rib -b_ -7 z fl �> SEE ISLAND DETAIL CURVE I RADIUS I LENGTH I TANGENT CHORD DELTA Cl 167.50' 201.96' 115.30'' 189.95' 69'04'58" * C10 20.00' 31.42' 20.00' 28.28' 90'00'00" * CURVE INFORMATION REFERS TO BACK OF CURB REFER TO THE BENCHMARK DESCRIBED ON SHEET 1A OF 13 IN THE RIVERWALK SEWER EXTENSION PLANS APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY MAY 16, 1995. 2030 TOP LEFT CURB 2020 2030 C/L 2020 2030 TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 Cd CO + co 00 0 TOP • CU 5' CUR 033 tej 00 + 03 TOP EXIST -O. s 080 -0. -0. N 03 N 0 � O K) 29 to 50 0 (37 N a. VC to N N O N 0 N ("4 / `UTU PLATTINt t POND SEE RIGHT f 10' UTILITY EASMENt 1 • / l . U) N tf) N + rn N O + N 0 0) 0 N -0.0200 00 N N 0) 0 O N -0.0 U, 00 0 N N - 0.0200 a 0 M z 30 200 II N N N N U) N + O UI N U') N + O rn M t0) N O N ;t 0) u7 N 0 N tri 00 0 N N ,+7 II M U) a N 5' 50 50 r APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6' A.C. IRRIGATION UNE. CALL CONSOUDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924 -3655 \ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT SEE SHEET 4AR FOR REVISED CURVE INFORMATION SALMON RIVER LANE - 0.0060 50 VC U) CO N U) 0 • N N Il a � CURB TRANSITION VC 03 ,, MI 0 ' N (N1 VC M U) t(') t1) N N 0 0 SEE RIGHT N + 'd' �l O N N NN II NN O N 5' CURB TRANSITION 31 0 H < te. 6 ) I , ..._..---,TRACT J .�.. 31+78.52 GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 - 0.0065 EXISTING Et GROUND 0 O + r M .0060 .0060 EXISTING GROUND 43 +04.56 A4ICHIELU LANE / ING cc M CO 03 N N FINISH O N 0 N • NOTE: THIS PLAN MAY NOT SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE EXISTENCE AND ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION: 31+39.0 TC =20 :6 FINISHED G ON RIVER LANE= ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. C RB INLET PE 1 GRADE 11 N i) N roan + N '-0 N FIN SHED GRADE INTERSECTION DETAI 5'R 100 SEE SHEET 4AR FOR REVISED SALMON RIVER LANE 2030 TOP LEFT CURB 2020 2030 C/L 2020 2030 0 0 N N TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 INTERSECTION DETAIL ID N SEE SHEET 4AR FOR REVISED SALMON RIVER LANE 2030 TOP LEFT CURB 2020 2030 C/L 2020 2030 TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 W. N W N U 0 U) n z W POND C2 POND C1 2 02 n • 0 GRAVEL ROAD DETAIL • TEMPORARY SEWER ACCESS 47 +15 CEN 41 SEC. 8, T.25 N., R.45 E.,W,M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON m CC Z O W N 03 0 N Z a 42 (00 0 M 0 - 0.0080 0 z 0 a - 0.0080 t 0 f":" IEN ISHED GRADE FINISHE D GRADE 4 +04.23 FIN ISHED GRADE TEMPORARY SEWER ACCESS GRAVEL ROAD RECORD DRAWING NOTES 1. TOLERANCES FOR RECORD DRAWINGS: IN OUR PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT, ELEVATIONS THAT ARE WITHIN 0.05' OF' DESIGNED ELEVATION ARE CONSIDERED TO BE BUILT AS DESIGNED. LENGTHS THAT ARE 0.10' OF DESIGNED LENGTH ARE CONSIDERED TO BUILT AS DESIGNED. IN THE EVENT THAT GREATER ACCURACY THAN THIS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR FUTURE DESIGNS OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, ADDITIONAL SURVEY INFORMATION SHOULD BE GATHERED. a + N N e 03 t 0 q 43 3 k cc z O 3 31 +78.52 SALMON RIVER LANE \ 1 S \ \ "4 - � ,.- iA 4 - k \ 1 \ ■ 3 h ' ° A W a - 0.0080 z `t' N 0 U) PLAT BOUNDARY CD d 0 N 4 - 0.0080 - 0.0080 POND B1 LANE= 4 44 U7 U) et 50 to 00 0 N 50 to 00 N N N 0 O 50 * 03 11 N d N VC Cs- to to 0 el- to to II c4 VC COLO ei- VC CO 0 co oo 0 5 0 CO 10 cNi 4 6 45 16' SIDEVADZ /* APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" .N A.C. IRRIGATION UNE. CALL CONSOUDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924-3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT 46+58.85 10' UTILITY EASMENT -- PLAT BOUNDARY +0.0080 EXISTING GROI +0.0080 EXISTING EXISTING GROUND REFER TO TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION OF GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD ON SHEET 1 150.00' to 46 CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 456-8000 Nn GROUND TEMPORARY GRAVEL TUR AROUND \- 47+ - 64.59 -- o co cc 0 0 co ct co in in 1-0- TEMPORARY TURN-AROUND EASEMENT J 03 TEMPORARY GRAVEL TURN-AROUND DETAIL 47 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 0 CONSTRUCT WHEELCHAIR RAMP PER SPOKANE COUNTY STD. A-5 0 CONSTRUCT SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE "A" CURB PER STD. A-3 Wwww INSTALL STREET AND STOP SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY AND M.U.T.C.D. STANDARDS INSTALL STREET SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY AND M.U.T.C.D. STANDARDS INSTALL SPOKANE COUNTY CURB INLET TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 PER STDS. 8-8 AND B-9 STA=31+39.02 LT. SIWWWWI CERTIFIED RECORD DRAWINGS DATE ACCEP 11 2030 OFFICIAL PUBLIC DOCUMENT `'c<■ ORIGINAL Aolor AMMO 2030 TOP LEFT CURB C/L 2020 2030 TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 co ° t;§ z rc z •:( 0 < Z Zc Ct cr ( 2R SH 4R JOB NUMBER RECORD DRAWING RIVERWALK TOP OF BERM ELEV.= TOP OF CURB ELEV. + .20' TYPE "B" CURB 18" TOP OF TYPE "B" CURB FLOW LINE CURB VARIES DRAINAGE STRUCTURE WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS NOTES: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. 5' TRANSITION PLAN VIEW FLOW LINE 5' TRANSITION I PROFILE VIEW TRANSITION DETAIL TYPE "8" CURB TO TYPE "R" CURB NTS DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN .9' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER LINE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST CURB DROP TO THE POND r immeor 1 VARIES GRATE ELEVATION TYPICAL '208' POND SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) TYPE "R" CURB 14" 10" TOP OF TYPE "R" CURB 4" R/W 4 THICK P.C.C. NORMAL ROLLED GUTTER UNE CURB GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE CONCRETE CURB OR CURB & GUTTER AS SPECIFIED IN PLANS //' CONCRETE APRON TOP OF BERM ELEV.= TOP OF CURB ELEV. + 0.20' TROWEL EDGES WITH 1/4" RADIUS EDGER (TYP) BROOM FINISH 2' TYPICAL PLAN SECTION VIEW 4' LONG DROP (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) VARIES CURB INLET TYPE 1 . (NOT TO SCALE) DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN 2' TYPICAL .5' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER LINE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST CURB DROP TO THE POND VARIES GRATE ELEVATION TYPICAL '208' POND SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) APRON GUTTER LINE DROPPED GUTTER LINE R/W 4 THICK P.C.C. GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE 'NORMAL GUTTER ',FLOWUNE ELEVATION ASPHALT* • PAVEMEN NORMAL ROLLED GUTTER UNE .CURB SECTION SECTION TYPE "R" CURB CONCRETE APRON TYPE "B" CURB Sc GUTTER TYPE "B" CURB & GUTTER DROPPED GUTTER UNE 2" NORMAL GUTTER FLOWUNE ELEVATION DROPPED GUTTER UNE TYPE "R" CURB 4" THICK P.C.C. GOVNTY ENGJNF� re OFFICIAL PUBLIC DOCUMENT `0 ORIGINAL ____. "AS -®I U I LTS" CERTIFIED RECORD DRAWINGS PROJECT #: r/ DATE ACCEPTED: 11 '1.90, A.• Amur .Air 4" THICK P.C.C. 1 / 0 Z CC � Z LL Q 0 - Z D .. w U) z 0 z re P Z PROPERTY LINE RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY 1 FLAT BOTTOM AREA 14 LF OF 12" CMP ® 4 FT.0.065 IE W ) t -2021.32 IE �E) 2020.41 SALMON RIVER LANE T•3 0 CONCRETE INLET TYPE I WITH,' TYPE 1 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA =31 +25 4 ' T GRATE ELEV & 2023.96 BOUNDARY OF LEVEL i r' Y 59.02' CURB INLET TYPE 1 & TYPE 2 STA= 02 TC 2024.42 DRAINAGE EASEMENT-- -" 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & LID WITH SOLID COVER STA =31 +25 2$= .LT UD ELEV POND "A2" POND BOTTOM POND BOTTOM PERIMETER = TOP OF BERM 2024.91 CURB INLET TYPE 1 & TYPE 2 STA = _ 4 TC 2024.78 ELEV = AREA = 98 LF. = 2025.06 W U RECORD DRAWING I OR MY AGENT HAVE PERIODICALLY REVIEWED THE CONSTRUCTION AND TO MY KNOWLEDGE FIND IT TO BE IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED CERTIFIED PLANS AND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS . NOTED. 2023.54 0 .F. 1" =20' rl .._.. • 35.00' .._. 5'r;$ i (14 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT 1 ! TRACT POND "B1" BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA POND BOTTOM ELEV POND BOTTOM AREA = PERIMETER = 100 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2025.06 POND "C2" POND BOTTOM ELEV = POND BOTTOM AREA = PERIMETER = 105.3 L.F. , TOP OF BERM = 2023.6 C r; i L1;i Z^CV •• _ i DRAINAGE !EASEMENT BOUNDARY OF ILEVEL FLAT BOTTOM !AREA 2 2022.37 1" =20' S.F. 2023.75 1 " =20' RIGHT OF WAY \ tz?, \ / \ / ita. •• 19 0 \ \ \ RECORD DRAWING NOTES 1. TOLERANCES FOR RECORD DRAWINGS: IN OUR PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT, ELEVATIONS THAT ARE WITHIN 0.05' OF DESIGNED ELEVATION ARE CONSIDERED TO BE BUILT AS DESIGNED. LENGTHS THAT ARE 0.10' OF DESIGNED LENGTH ARE CONSIDERED TO BUILT AS DESIGNED. IN THE EVENT THAT GREATER ACCURACY THAN THIS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR FUTURE DESIGNS OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, ADDITIONAL SURVEY INFORMATION SHOULD BE GATHERED. 2. POND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS HAVE NOT BEEN INSTALLED AS OF 10/29/96. CURB INLET TYPE 1 & TYPE 2 STA =44 +50 TC= 2023.76 \ \ . o / �C Y / SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD - TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH ■ TYPE 4 MET .. & GRATE N • STA =44 +60 *Aj-.jaru 25.75' RT. GRATE ELEV= I . +3 SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & LID WITH SOLID STA =44 +60 LID ELEV CURB INLET TYPE 1 STA= TC 15 LF OF 12" 0 0.1 IE N IE(S, \ \ kti - N BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA DRAINAGE EASEMENT 21.1' LT 2 2023.94 CMP 2020.46 /;:t 5' 1YP /q \` •, z 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT N \` �•.,` 4 � • CONCRETE INLET TYPE 1 META STA =44 +65 GRATE EL MOM BOUNDARY .OF LEVEL FLAT BO'fT(M AREA DRAINAGE EASEMENT o /4. /! A __ / 5' TYR TYPE I WITH E & GRATE 36.5' LT 2022.93 POND "B2" POND BOTTOM ELEV = POND BOTTOM AREA = PERIMETER = 108 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2023.96 16 WIDE SIDEWALK & UTtLfTT- .EASEMENT 'OEWA 1 •••••■• CURB INLET TYPE 1 STA= TC 2024.05 RIGHT OF WAY 5 POND "Cl" POND BOTTOM ELEV = POND BOTTOM AREA = 3 .6 S.F. PERIMETER = 73.7 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2024.66 2022.27 Gf:CGYt`.' �•:iZ a: � .8 S.F. 1 =20' �UNTY ENG►NFF S ce OFFICIAL PUBUC DOCUMENT F ORIGINAL "AS- BUILTS° CERTIFIED RECORD DRAWINGS PROJECT #: DATE ACCEPTED: J1 - 9(0 li! w 0 00 5 0 w N f!: 0 2 a 0 0 U rn z 0 z N ti II o * SHEET 4R OF 4R JOB NUMBER 95618 October 31, 1995 Todd Whipple, P.E. IPEC SUBJECT: Gentlemen: DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., Acting County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director Riverwalk 3rd Addition u mittal Accepted We have conducted a general evaluation of your recent submittal for this project, and we find that this submittal appears to meet the minimum standards of the Spokane County Standards, r Road and Sewer Construction ( "SCRS "). We are, therefore, able to accept your approval of the plans and calculations for this project. I am enclosing a sepia print of your approved road and drainage plans for this project: the originals as; on file at the Public Works Department. A copy of your approved drainage calculations also enclosed. In accordance with Section 5.02.D of the SCRS, this acceptance is valid until October 30, 1995. If the facilities are not constructed, you may request an extension of the acceptance for an additional two years; the plans shall be revised to reflect current standards prior to granting the extension. Please note: 1. The County's acceptance of this submittal does not relieve the sponsor or his agents from any liability related to portions of the design that are not in conformance with the SCRS, or which do not follow good engineering practice; 2. All permits and notifications necessary prior to construction are the responsibility of the project Sponsor and /or his assigned agents; and 3. The County will not release the bond for construction services under this project until (a) all construction documentation and certified Record Drawings have been submitted and accepted; and (b) all construction deficiencies noted in the County's Acceptance Inspection have been corrected (for swales "A2" and "C2 "). 4. Since (a) the private road accesses from the portion of Indiana Avenue to be constructed as part of the improvements in Riverwalk 2nd Addition; (b) the right -of -way for that portion of Indiana Avenue will not exist until that plat is finalized; and (c) Riverwalk 2nd Addition will not be allowed to finalize until Indiana Avenue is constructed and accepted, then 1026 W Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 P1414B - Riverwalk 3rd Addition Submittal Accepted October 31, 1995 Page 2 of 2 Final Plat approval for Riverwalk 3rd Addition will not be granted by the County Engineer's Office until the Final Plat of Riverwalk 2nd Addition has been recorded. 5. Per our October 30, 1995 meeting, a "fatal flaw" check of the plans and calculations (for ponds "A2" and "C2 ") has not yet been accomplished. The County will conduct a "fatal flaw" check and advise you of the results. As you agreed at this meeting, any "fatal flaws" uncovered by our check will be corrected prior to the County's acceptance of the improvements indicated on the project plans. If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, William A. Johns, P. E. Acting Spokane County Engineer Edward , Jr., P.E. Plan Review Engineer encls: Plans (4 sheets) - sepia 'Drainage Calculations it, cc: project file Pat Harper Dave Berto Permit Technician - Sylvia Lightfoot reviewer Project Sponsor: Dean Housley Company (Verne Jacobsen) - via fax SIDEWALK '& UTILITY EASEMENT 16' BORDER, SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT NOTES 2" CLASS "B" ASPHALT `CONCRETE CONTAINING '- 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. MIN SIDEWALK 1 -2" `CLASS "8" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING (ONE SIDE ONLY) 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. 1) ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE "SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION 1995 ", AND AS AMENDED. 2) LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN IN THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. ANY CONFLICTING UTILITIES SHALL BE RELOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A COMPLETE SET OF THE APPROVED ROAD AND DRAINAGE PLANS ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DISCOVERS ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE PLANS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE SPOKANE COUNTY 'ENGINEER'S OFFICE. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF DRYWELLS, INSTALL FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) BETWEEN THE DRYWELL BARREL AND THE WASHED DRAINROCK, AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAINROCK AND THE NATIVE SOILS. PRIOR TO SITE CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. CALL THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATION SERVICE AT 456 -8000 BEFORE YOU DIG. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE AN EFFORT TO PROTECT ALL CATCH BASINS AND DRYWELLS FROM BEING CONTAMINATED WITH SILT BY INSTALLING FILTER FABRIC OVER THE METAL FRAME DURING THE INSTALLATION AND KEEPING IT IN PLACE UNTIL THE STREETS HAVE BEEN PAVED AND CLEANED. THE. STREET FRONTAGE OF ALL LOTS SHALL BE GRADED WITH A TEMPORARY CUTOFF SWALE AS SHOWN ON THIS PAGE. ROAD EASEM ENT LIMITS ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS 15.5'. PAVED WIDTH TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION MICHIELLI LANE N T-S .0200 FT. /FT 50' ROAD EASEMENT TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION SALMON RIVER LANE N.T'.S. ALL DRYWELL CONNECTION PIPES SHALL BE PLACED BELOW THE DRYWELL CONCRETE CAP AND SHALL FLOW AS DIRECTED IN THE PLANS. C/L 10' ISLAND 5' 5' 10) FOR ANY CURB GRADES LESS THAN 0.8% (0.0080FT. /FT.), A WASHINGTON STATE- LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE CURB FORMS ARE AT THE GRADES NOTED ON THE APPROVED PLANS, PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF CURB MATERIAL. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING AND COORDINATING WORK WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR. 15.5' PAVED WIDTH SPOKANE COUNTY ROLLED CURB 8' ;PAVED WIDTH BACK OF 'TYPE ' B" CURB, ROLLED CURB OR SIDEWALK ON PLANS ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS 5' MIN. UTILITY EASEMENT 10' `—SPO. CO. STD. TYPE "R" CURB (ROLLED CURB) DEVE(LOPER'S APPROVAL 5:1 T'P TYPICAL TEMPORARY CUTOFF SWALE STREET PLANS FOR RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITIOV SEC 8, T.25N, R.45E., W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER SHEET SALMON RIVER LANE MICHIELLI LANE DETAILS POND DETAILS .0200 4" BASE COURSE ON 8" SUBBASE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT SPECIFICATIONS. 24' SEWER EASEMENT .0200 SWALE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WHEN THE CURBS ARE BACKFILLED AND SHALL 'REMAIN IN PLACE THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. THE SWALES SHOULD BE GRADED OUT WITH FINE GRADING IMMEDIATELY' PRIOR TO SEEDING OR PLACEMENT OF SOD. TYPICAL C S SECTION GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD 1 . 1 -'. �:� M �;O (APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT 100 Bridgeport Are_ Budd Ave. rte` Sodom Ave. _. ;;: ,.1 PRO R.1jr LOCATION i ♦.� 8 v —AFL Illation Ave. � � va ��� ', cattldo w. ./...."- fey vie ®;cam (.rcen Acres ` � Po s : � P Office d qwy. � a mod ¢ I'•• a vn..w, qd.� •q n n / "> W i ?ndA,F. d 77 x � d 1.0 cw. I Winker a. nh An. " Cie.-date ' Wan. e be. u Rr, em Ave. , ... TEMPORARY 'TURN- AROUND EASEMENT VICINIT' OFpi IA-L` Pub . !c 4?OcuttteN1 S Po tchr► c o cw f E 44 /Nee* &FP>. ?ao1 CT _ : P t4I4-8 DA-r- ` ' ACC - Teb I aerg5 tivokr e?'5 'kW '[ `` r F) Cats STIRucn c Dow(oorknos C04.6 D (045 A-Re 2WAa a) ?/24010.. . To et.. SE of NA ( C&P.I sifatLTtu ErJ4 rtgEElt.tei't 5ettviceS APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT @ 924-3655 MAP ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT THE DESIGN 'IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN IN THIS SET OF PLANS AND CALCULATIONS CONFORM TO APPLICABLE EDITIONS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION AND THE SPOKANE COUNTY GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. ALL DESIGN DEVIATIONS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER. I APPROVE THESE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION. t� o r C a,. SIDEWALK '& UTILITY EASEMENT 16' BORDER, SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT NOTES 2" CLASS "B" ASPHALT `CONCRETE CONTAINING '- 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. MIN SIDEWALK 1 -2" `CLASS "8" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING (ONE SIDE ONLY) 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. 1) ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE "SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION 1995 ", AND AS AMENDED. 2) LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN IN THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. ANY CONFLICTING UTILITIES SHALL BE RELOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A COMPLETE SET OF THE APPROVED ROAD AND DRAINAGE PLANS ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DISCOVERS ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE PLANS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE SPOKANE COUNTY 'ENGINEER'S OFFICE. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF DRYWELLS, INSTALL FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) BETWEEN THE DRYWELL BARREL AND THE WASHED DRAINROCK, AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAINROCK AND THE NATIVE SOILS. PRIOR TO SITE CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. CALL THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATION SERVICE AT 456 -8000 BEFORE YOU DIG. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE AN EFFORT TO PROTECT ALL CATCH BASINS AND DRYWELLS FROM BEING CONTAMINATED WITH SILT BY INSTALLING FILTER FABRIC OVER THE METAL FRAME DURING THE INSTALLATION AND KEEPING IT IN PLACE UNTIL THE STREETS HAVE BEEN PAVED AND CLEANED. THE. STREET FRONTAGE OF ALL LOTS SHALL BE GRADED WITH A TEMPORARY CUTOFF SWALE AS SHOWN ON THIS PAGE. ROAD EASEM ENT LIMITS ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS 15.5'. PAVED WIDTH TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION MICHIELLI LANE N T-S .0200 FT. /FT 50' ROAD EASEMENT TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION SALMON RIVER LANE N.T'.S. ALL DRYWELL CONNECTION PIPES SHALL BE PLACED BELOW THE DRYWELL CONCRETE CAP AND SHALL FLOW AS DIRECTED IN THE PLANS. C/L 10' ISLAND 5' 5' 10) FOR ANY CURB GRADES LESS THAN 0.8% (0.0080FT. /FT.), A WASHINGTON STATE- LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE CURB FORMS ARE AT THE GRADES NOTED ON THE APPROVED PLANS, PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF CURB MATERIAL. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING AND COORDINATING WORK WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR. 15.5' PAVED WIDTH SPOKANE COUNTY ROLLED CURB 8' ;PAVED WIDTH BACK OF 'TYPE ' B" CURB, ROLLED CURB OR SIDEWALK ON PLANS ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS ROAD EASEMENT LIMITS 5' MIN. UTILITY EASEMENT 10' `—SPO. CO. STD. TYPE "R" CURB (ROLLED CURB) DEVE(LOPER'S APPROVAL 5:1 T'P TYPICAL TEMPORARY CUTOFF SWALE STREET PLANS FOR RIVERWALK 3RD ADDITIOV SEC 8, T.25N, R.45E., W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER SHEET SALMON RIVER LANE MICHIELLI LANE DETAILS POND DETAILS .0200 4" BASE COURSE ON 8" SUBBASE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT SPECIFICATIONS. 24' SEWER EASEMENT .0200 SWALE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WHEN THE CURBS ARE BACKFILLED AND SHALL 'REMAIN IN PLACE THROUGHOUT THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. THE SWALES SHOULD BE GRADED OUT WITH FINE GRADING IMMEDIATELY' PRIOR TO SEEDING OR PLACEMENT OF SOD. TYPICAL C S SECTION GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD 1 . 1 -'. �:� M �;O (APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT 100 Bridgeport Are_ Budd Ave. rte` Sodom Ave. _. ;;: ,.1 PRO R.1jr LOCATION i ♦.� 8 v —AFL Illation Ave. � � va ��� ', cattldo w. ./...."- fey vie ®;cam (.rcen Acres ` � Po s : � P Office d qwy. � a mod ¢ I'•• a vn..w, qd.� •q n n / "> W i ?ndA,F. d 77 x � d 1.0 cw. I Winker a. nh An. " Cie.-date ' Wan. e be. u Rr, em Ave. , ... TEMPORARY 'TURN- AROUND EASEMENT VICINIT' OFpi IA-L` Pub . !c 4?OcuttteN1 S Po tchr► c o cw f E 44 /Nee* &FP>. ?ao1 CT _ : P t4I4-8 DA-r- ` ' ACC - Teb I aerg5 tivokr e?'5 'kW '[ `` r F) Cats STIRucn c Dow(oorknos C04.6 D (045 A-Re 2WAa a) ?/24010.. . To et.. SE of NA ( C&P.I sifatLTtu ErJ4 rtgEElt.tei't 5ettviceS APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT @ 924-3655 MAP ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT THE DESIGN 'IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN IN THIS SET OF PLANS AND CALCULATIONS CONFORM TO APPLICABLE EDITIONS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION AND THE SPOKANE COUNTY GUIDELINES FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. ALL DESIGN DEVIATIONS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER. I APPROVE THESE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION. t� o r 2030 TOP LEFT CURB 2020 - 0.0080 0.02 f N II 1.60 I NN 'I 0 0 0 0 0 0 N}NN i")NN tool tri 11 0 ) N o + N 50 VC „ ., I tf) ? 0 ) to N ( tf) r te ; O N O' _ __I U � � h- 1-'0- 0 it d tt 0r + 0-01J tf) +NN +N 11 ci 0 00 00 0 o r') N N') N N N 5 CURB TRANSITION - EXISTING GROUND —0.0060 EXISTING GROUND cc Il +. CURB INLET TYPE 1 31+39.02 TC= 2024.86 FINISHED GRADE 2030 TOP LEFT CURB 2020 — 0.0080 — 0.0080 FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE — 0.0080 - 0: 0080 50 VC (0 LO CO . _ -_ ... + N .4 N CO : (0 (0 in CO N in 00 C . _Nj ._ _ - - - -- .S. _.,. -, - - 4 - N 01 ± N d- O 0 d- 0 ,t- N N d- N 0.0080 'STING :CRQUND EXISTING GROUND N Csl O N1 N O N 2030 c : t Art-': PUPA. t G o ca ll SPple- Je ova r> 1rte - '5 aFiRa C/L O?:zazt4 1. ?R;o3t " $4.443 2020 DATE p cci't?CD 3q,t c 4ls `" R,Gt *A2" 4 l42" c y J ciptisTigglioal DOC WNCMh-TtrN hNb RE CC b 1>PA140445 Me k4uIae 1 pIttaQ T .. "Tgtz ok a aF to '51 - RUC ICAO ltsC tK'a Sea vi G!6 2030 TOP LEFT CURB 2020 2030 TOP RIGHT CURB 2020 — -- —0.0200 c') c, m 0 w < w co < Lr W w ci U ERISTIVC r STEWAffc 13 +00:51 INDIANA AVENUE= 'I 30 +00 SALMON RIVER LANE I ` APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION < DISTRICT 0 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT REFER TO THE BENCHMARK DESCRIBED ON SHEET 1A OF 13 IN THE RIVERWALK SEWER EXTENSION PLANS APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY MAY 16, 1995.. * CURVE INFORMATION REFERS TO BACK OF CURB 10' UTILITY— EASMENT N29'59'43 W DELTA 01 - 167.50' 201.96' 115.30' 189.95' C10 20.00' 31.42' 20.00' 28.28' 1/6' SIDEWALK & — /UTILITY EASEMENT. 6' Sts ? A w� eGtiC SEE RIGHT POND 43 +04,56 ' APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A.C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 924 -3655 ATTENTION .BOB ASHCRAFT NOTE: THIS PLAN MAY NOT SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE EXISTENCE AND ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 31 +78.52 SALMON' RIVER LANE INTERSECTION DETAIL 30 +45 2026.25 TC INTERSECTION , DETAIL 42 +04:23 TEMPORARY SEWER ACCESS GRAVEL ROAD PLAT BOUNDARY POND B1 POND B2 DEVELbPER'S APPROVAL POND C1 TEMPORARY SEWER ACCESS GRAVEL ROAD DETAIL _52.6; ' 6' N09'04'4 7.8 50.14` 2 REFER -- REFER TO TYPICAL CROSS - SECTION OF GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD ON SHEET 1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXIST. 6" A,C. IRRIGATION LINE. CALL CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT 0 924 -3655 ATTENTION BOB ASHCRAFT 16' SIDEWALK 147.47' & UTILITY EASMENT 150.00' —PLA1 I30UNDAR'1 TEMPORARY GRAVEL TUR AROUND 46 +83.70 2025.0 TEMPORARY GRAVEL - 47+19.27 2025.8 TURN—AROUND DETAIL 47 +19.59 2024.9 CONSTRUCTION NOTES ' V CONSTRUCT WHEELCHAIR RAMP PER SPOKANE COUNTY STD. A -5 CONSTRUCT SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE CURB PER STD. A -3 • �3 INSTALL STREET AND STOP SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY AND M.U.T.C.D. STANDARDS INSTALL STREET SIGN PER SPOKANE • COUNTY AND M.U.T.C.D. STANDARDS INSTALL SPOKANE COUNTY CURB INLET TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 PER STDS. 8 -8 AND B -9 STA =31 +39,02 LT. 47 +64.27 2026.2 Z O II CC O r ! to 0 uj O X. tek'.a:i! TOP OF BERM ELEV.= TOP OF CURB ELEV. -1- .20' NOTES: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN > ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. TYPE B" CURB TOP OF 'TYPE "B CURB FLOW LINE 3 MAX. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE -- � WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS 5' TRANSITION PLAN VIEW FLOW' LINE --' ' TRANSITION TYPE " CURB TO TYPE "R" CURB DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN .O' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER LINE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST CURB DROP TO THE POND GRATE ELEVATION NORMAL GUTTER LINE 4:1 (TYP) 1 4' THICK P.C.C. GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE ROLLED CURB -- CONCRETE CURB OR CURB & GUTTER AS SPECIFIED IN PLANS CONCRETE APRON TROWEL EDGES WITH 1 /4" RADIUS EDGER .(TYP) - BROOM FINISH— PLAN VIEW 3 MAX. j 1 TYPICAL 4' LONG DROP 2' TYPICAL (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) SECTION CURB INLET TYPE (NOT TO SCALE) DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN GUIIER LINE .5' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER LINE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST CURB DROP TO THE POND GRATE ELEVATION APRON 1 ' -- DROPPED GUTTER LINE TYPICAL '208' POND SECTIONAL. VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) 4 THICK P.C.C. GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASPHALT PAVEMENT NORMAL GUTTER FLOWLINE ELEVATION CONCRETE APRON TYPE "B" CURB & GUTTER TYPE "B" CURB & GUTTER DROPPED GUTTER LINE -2" NORMAL GUTTER FLOWLINE ELEVATION DROPPED 4 :1 (TYP) R'S APPROVAL DATE ' THICK P.C.C. �F Fl C I kt. $U G 0oeustersr SPaKk�C Gotu.fl1 E IAt.. wR.''S Cf FIZZ D2Z arm ? +ct ft pt 14(3 DATe NctePTet 31 ocTe15 (SWALE 4 P2" '`GZ" em.1) CoN'JP12UGt ION boe MNTMioMM t era DRAw'1N4 ASE RE'414( 3 P2 (et To teLvIttle aF itotsb p,j C&A5rfry tiom &NG in1 E21NG SekU1CC -3 J Li z 0 O Z NJ < C0 O I > CO ' I oo -tt to UJ 0) C7 Z �✓ PLAT BOUNDARY - 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY-; 14 LF OF 12 CMP Cv .0.15 FT. /FT.: IE(W)= 2021.29 IE(E) =2019.19 CONCRETE INLET TYPE 1 WITH TYPE 1 METAL FRAME -& GRATE STA =31 +25`.42' LT. GRATE ELEV=2024.13 5' TYP -` SALMON RIVER LANE BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA I oho 'a :o DRAINAGE EASEMENT 35.00' I 59.02 SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD ---` TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4- METAL FRAME & LID WITH SOLID COVER STA=31+25 28' LT LID ELEV= 2025.14 CURB INLET TYPE 1 & TYPE 2 STA =31 +39.02 TC= 2024.86 CURB INLET TYPE & TYPE 2 STA =43 +00 TC= 2024.86 DEVELOP' R'S ' APPROVAL POND BOTTOM ELEV = 2023.63 POND BOTTOM AREA = 490 S.F. PERIMETER = 98 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2025.06 35.00' 16' WIDE SIDEWALK UTILITY EASEMENT TRACT "C POND BOTTOM ELEV = 2024.03 BOTTOM AREA = 525 S.F. PERIMETER = 100 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2025.06 POND "C2" DRAINAGE EASEMENT BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT R( TTOM AREA OH I OF POND BOTTOM ELEV = 2022.53 POND BOTTOM AREA = 639.2 S.F. PERIMETER = 105.3 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2023.96 CURB INLET TYPE 1 & TYPE ST.A =44 +50 TC - = 2023.76 SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD N TYPE " E3" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME &GRATE STA =44 +60 22.5' RT. GRATE ELEV =2023.03 SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE " B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & LID WITH SOLID COVER 1 STA=44±60 20.5' LT LID ELEV =2023 78 15 LF OF 12 CMP @ 0.15 FT. /FT. IE(N)= 2020.53 IE(S) =2018.28 10' WIDE UTILITY • EASEMENT BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA DRAINAGE EASEMENT CONCRETE INLET TYPE 1 WITH TYPE 1 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA =44 +65 35' LT GRATE ELEV = 2023,03 DRAINAGE EASEMENT CURB INLET TYPE STA=45+50 TC=2024 46 POND "01" POND BOTTOM ELEV = 2022.53 POND BOTTOM AREA - 573.8 S.F. PERIMETER = 108 L.F. TOP OF BERM = 2023.96 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & UTILITY EASEMENT POND BOTTOM ELEV = 2023.63 POND BOTTOM AREA = 333.6 S.F. PERIMETER = 73.7 L.F. _. TOP OF BERM = 2024.66 RIGHT OF WAY OFF t c t A-L- pt 1 L► c a oc-tt e s SPo10 Cbt4t4 f onitmagew ' . dPFReE ik.baeCT : pi¢L VATtr Act r 31 oc.T 9S c0N5TQUC1`CO*1 ''poCtAANTArt A-Ne■ Rrca2.D DR. WLNCs A- 2EZZGu1Q Pk t o^ - To eV- ASE OF " t3at rh PoE c LIsttuc - r - tPJ C- gCi[nt h►(.c S .12t/tc4gS z 0 v) w 0