The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1473-84IvtAr N A-AA e- Vv I cu w 0 UD I e - K (C/,c C_ - III/) I NI ■ nAe e o f ,Gars 1 11 �� Jry 4 4it 6-1-1 A/mar rite eieeo ut a'! lass l ' o o K lass a dVW .o.-- tSetsenv6 s 0 0 Ls . D k" O F O 4-- S FFICJ4d_ 5 oK r I) /ad 51 ;L at>m ocf Z 2)) f 3 -cD 1)-�x" � X01. f e` ev9 A s An Q e ae G-e- �y c 4 U S p k_ s.._ 'r 7 2 BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION ) OF TIME REQUEST FOR ) PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE ) APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT ) THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from George Thompson, Wallace Construction, Inc. has been received and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter III, Section G) and RCW 58.17.140. t FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning. 2. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on October 8, 1984. 3. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and department policy for short subdivisions. These criteria are found in Chapter III, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this decision. 4. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. 5. The Spokane City Public Works Department recommends that the owner be made aware that the original public sewer and water plans approved by the City Public Works Department, must be resubmitted for review and approval as per updated standards regarding design and format. 6. No additional conditions have been recommended by the other reviewing agencies and departments, including the County Engineers Office, County Health District, County Utilities and the Department of Building & Safety. 7. This is the second request for a time extension. The total life of the preliminary plat has been approximately 6 years. 8. The following facts are also relevant. a. The existing zoning changed on January 1, 1991 in accordance with the "Program to Implement" the Spokane County Zoning Code. The zoning for this site is now Urban Residential -3.5 (UR- 3.5). b. The original approval was for 22 duplex lots and 5 multiple family complexes of 25 units per complex. 9. This extension of time is granted based upon minimal progress. Most serious reexamination of progress toward finalizing should be shown or future extensions will likely not be granted. BASED UPON A REVIEW of (a) the criteria for approving an extension of time of the expiration date for a preliminary plat and (b) the above Findings of Fact, the following conclusions are made. 1. That a one year time extension be granted until April 1, 1992. 2. The applicant/owner should show substantially greater progress toward complying with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time. 3. That the development is consistent with Comprehensive Plan of Spokane County. Extension of Time Findings. File No. PE- 1473 -84 Page 2 DECISION BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request for application PE- 1473 -84 is hereby APPROVED until April 1, 1992. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. A consolidated set of applicable conditions of approval is attached. Additionally,the following apply. 2. Subsequent extension of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial compliance with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance; otherwise the preliminary subdivision approval will become null and void. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS (UPDATED) 1. That the "Conceptual Plan - Inland Pit Rehabilitation" is not being approved or any assurances given. Further subdivision and Zone Change applications will be required or any such approvals for the remainder of the 116 acres. 2. That the Final Plat Dedication shall include: "No footings and foundation shall be constructed within Block 1 until a Certified Pit Rehabilitation Plan has been submitted to Spokane County Engineer and County Planning Director for there review for completeness and proper certification by a qualified and Washington State licensed professional engineer and as conditioned with approval of PE- 1473 -84." 3. That the sponsor or future applicant shall be required to rehabilitate portions of the north and adjacent pit prior to construction of footings and foundations for Lots 1 thru 5 of block 1 as follows: Lots 1,2, and 3 requires Quadrant #4 of the Pit * be rehabilitated prior to said construction/development. Lots 4 and 5 requires Quadrant #3 of the Pit * be rehabilitated prior to said construction/development. * = as shown on the "Conceptual Plan - Inland Pit Rehabilitation" received date September 26, 1984 4. The above Pit Rehabilitation Plan shall provide a 2:1 slope as proposed by the sponsor or as close as is possible, shall include preventions for soil erosion, shall include seeding, planting or landscaping of the reshaped slopes, and shall include any necessary safety features warranted for safety of the public. It is recommended that the sponsor /applicant contact Washington State Department of Natural Resources and the local Soil Conservation Service prior to the preparations of said plan 5. The above Pit Rehabilitation Plan shall be the responsibility of the sponsor /applicant and said Plan is to be prepared by a Washington State Licensed Engineer. *The certification shall address stability and compaction of the soil, soil erosion, ground cover, and soil characteristic regarding support and stability for any footings and foundations of adjacent multi- family structures. 6. Spokane County may request other- agencies of expertise to provide a courtesy review and comment on the above Pit Rehabilitation Plan prior to granting permission to proceeding with any construction of said footings and foundations. 7 . The safety fence condition shall still apply for any areas of the pit that has not been reshaped to a 2:1 slope, as approved by the County Planning Department. Bonding of fencing will not be allowed - -- the fence(s) shall be constructed and in place prior to issuing the Final Inspection or Occupancy Permit for any dwelling in the Proposal (be it duplex or apartment). Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1473 -84 Page 3 8. The fmal plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat (dated July 10. 1984) of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. 9. That preliminary plat of record approval is for the property described in the Legal Description, signed and stamped by the sponsor's licensed land surveyor, being part of the application for this proposal. 10. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for one year, specifically to April 1, 1992. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request approximately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. Such applications should demonstrate the progress made toward finalizing this preliminary plat. If an Extension -or -Time is not requested in a timely manner or said Extension is not granted, then the preliminary plat and the is NULL AND VOID. 11. A final plat name /number shall be indicated before the fmal plat is filed, such name/number to be approved by the Planning Director /designee. 12. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. 13. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the fmal plat. 14. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. 15. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 16. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision or binding site plan, and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 17. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state - licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat," including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as- built" water system. 18. The Water Plan and the above four (4) conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director /designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 19. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 20. Upon filing the fmal plant the zone change shall be finalized and the existing UR 3.5 zone classification shall be changed to UR - 7, except Preliminary Plat Block 1 be changed to UR - 22. The final plat must meet the standards of these zones. 21. That prior to filing the final plat, a specificlandscape plan with irrigation system be prepared by a qualified professional and submitted to the Spokane County Subdivision Administrator for review and approval with provisionf Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1473 -84 Page 4 a. Substantial landscape screening along the west side of Lot 1, Block 1, which provide visual screening of existing or potential residences on lots west across Havana (Note, total screening may not be required for the full length of Lot 1). The screening shall be living evergreen trees or shrubs and planting height of 4 to 5 feet of a specie that will grow to a height of at least 10 feet, such as arborvitae. A "clear view triangle" is required at 14th Avenue and Havana b. A partial landscape and landscape screening is required along the south "end" of each apartment building. 22. That a building setback is required 85 feet north of 14th Avenue centerline for all lots within Block 1 and a setback at the southwest comer of Lot 1, Block 1, being a rectangle 150 feet north -south and 100 feet east -west. 23. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 24. That the UR-22 lots be substantially developed as indicated on the "concept site plans" for the apartments, as approved by the County Subdivision Administrator. The purpose being to assure the general concept of "L" shaped apartments, located at the north end of the Lots, and the open -space oriented toward 14th Avenue. 25. That the profile or height of the apartments shall not exceed 2 -story plus foundation from the present ground level. The purpose being to prevent 3 or more story structures above the dwellings south and west. 26. That the final plat dedication indicate: "No direct access shall be allowed onto Havana from Lot 1. Block 1 and Lot 1 Block 2" NOTE: A crash gate for fire protection is acceptable for Lot 1, Block 1 onto Havana, if necessary. 27. That as part of the landscaping plan, a plan for 6 ft. security/safety fence along the perimeter of the Pit bluff shall be submitted by the sponsor to the County Subdivision Administrator for review and approval. The intent is to provide a fence for those areas of the Pit bluff owned by the sponsor where a child or person could slip and not be able to recover due to the steepness of the pit sides or sidewalls 28. That the final plat dedication reference to or include provisions of operation and maintenance of the Pit Safety Fence by the owners of adjacent property and/or lots. 29. That prior to issuing the "Final Inspection" or "Occupancy" Permit for any building permit within this preliminary plat the 6 ft. Pit Safety Fence or equivalent safety provision shall be constructed. The intent is to assure that any new families in this development will have existing provisions for safety regarding the Pit. 30. That the fence shall have posted warning signs. 31. That provision for "divided duplexes" are approved for the UR-7 lots. 32. That appropriate "divided duplex" lot lines shall be designated on the Final Plat as approved by the Spokane County Subdivision Administrator. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING CONDITIONS (UPDATED) 1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. Plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1473 -84 Page 5 3. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as- built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right - of -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 6. All construction within the existing or proposed public right -of -way is to be completed prior to filing each final plat, or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "as- built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 7. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the county road system. 8. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. 9. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which resolution establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 10. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing county road system warrants the dedication of additional right -of -way and the roadway improvements herein specified. 11. That Public Road Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section be: "Section Number 1 for 14th Avenue north side minimum paving width "Access standard ". "Section Number 2 for 14th Avenue south side minimum paving width "Access standard ". "Section Number 2 for. 15th and 16th Avenues, and Lloyd & Morrill minimum paving width "Access standard ". 12. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from Lot 1, Block 1, Lot 1, Block 2 onto Havana. 13. Existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and curbed to Spokane County standards. 14. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. 15. Applicant shall petition the Board of County Commissioners to vacate those public road right -of -ways which are proposed for use as portion of lots. These vacations must be accomplished prior to filine any portion of the plat which proposes use of road right -of- way parcels. 16. Any petition to vacate county road right -of -way shall be for vacation of full width right - of -ways. SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (UPDATED) 1. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 2. That connection be made to City of Spokane's sanitary sewer system. Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1473 -84 Page 6 SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS (UPDATED) 1. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane) State Department of Health. 2. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 3. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 4. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will be made available for the [plat/project], and individual service will be provided to each lot/tract prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized." SPOKANE COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS (UPDATED) 1. That the WATER PLAN shall show the location of each fire hydrant or fire prevention facility and must comply with Chapter 10.04 of the Spokane County Uniform Fire Code Ordinance, as amended. 2. That the WATER PLAN shall specify the gallons per minute for each fire hydrant at residual pressure of no less than 20 p.s.i. (a minimum pressure). 3 . That the Water Purveyor and Fire District shall sign the WATER PLAN prior to County Building & Safety Department's review. SPOKANE CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (UPDATED) 1. The owner(s) should be made aware that the original public sewer and water plans approved by the City Public Works Department, must be resubmitted for review and approval as per updated standards regarding design and format. CITY OF SPOKANE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS (UPDATED) 1. That prior to filing the Final Plat, the sponsor shall provide Spokane County Planning Department with written approval of road plans and profiles as prepared by the sponsor and indicating approval by City of Spokane Utility Department The plans will be for curbs, paving and sidewalks along Havana Street for the frontage of the proposal only and for the project's half of Havana. 2. That the sponsor shall cause the County and City road plans and profiles to be coordinated so that each road system elevation match to one another. DATED THIS a OF MARCH, 1991. BILL MOSER Planner I enclosure Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with $100 processing fee,to the Spokane County Planning Department, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456 -2205. Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1473 -84 Page 7 c: County Engineer County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety George V. Thompson, 518 East High Drive, Spokane, WA 99203 Adams and Clark, 501 North Riverpoint Boulevard, Spokane, WA OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON January 30, 1991 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Current Planning Administrator) FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SUBJ: EXTENSION OF TIME, PE 1473-84 / Wildwood Terrace time. re: Subdivisions We have reviewed the above referenced Extension of Time request. The following comments are applicable to the request. The County Engineer has no additional comments to add at this N SPONANC COUNTY COURT HOUSE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 MEMORANDUM Spokane County County Engineer Spokane County Utilities Spokane County Health District Spokane County Department of Building & Safety Fire Protection District 1 Spokane City Public Works Dept. - Desi n n Services Section FROM: William J. Moser, Planner I i ' t aa-LJ DATE: January 11, 1991 SUBJECT: Extension of Time for PE- 1473 -84, Wildwood Terrace The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached request for an Extension of Time to finalize the plat of PE- 1473 -84, Wildwood Terrace. If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should be made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to me" by ail , Thank you. kc c: George V. Thompson, E. 518 High Drive, Spokane, WA. 99203 Enclosure 434:M Tikirir Plat Number: Pf N/.3 6 Plat Name: t d ez , ) , Number of Lots: Sponsor: t=>c i // 2 Z' Property Owner: r -, --, Address: <::: -57 /4 Address: :��6 � 6/ P^ City, State, Zip: f`� (8 �2� P� J City, State, Zip: l/J j.2U2 Phone No: c CJ Engineer /Surveyor: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone PRELIMINARY PLAT EXTENSION OF TIME FORM * * * * * * * * * * * Number of Acres: /`2 S Phone No: 25p PHASED PROTECT (TO BE COMPLETED ONLY IF THE PLAT IS BEING DEVELOPED AND FINALIZED IN PHASES) Number of lots originally approved: !/C/ � ` 7 Number of phases finalized to date: Number of lots remaining to be finalized: U'miber of acres remaining * * * * * * * * * * * PLEASE PROVIDE L4 WITH THE FOLLOWING IIaURMATION Briefly summarize the progress made, to date, in preparing the plat to be finalized (i.e., physical construction, bonding for improvements, surveying and drafting work, accomplishing various departmental requirements, obtaining or granting easements, etc.) /'r ! -i 7 Signed;" / J f� ic•. t Survey +r Page 10 D. TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE ZE -88 -84 Agricultural to R -2 and MFS I . GENERAL INFORMATION Sponsor: 535 -7619 George Thompson E. 518 High Drive Spokane, WA 99203 PLANNING REPORT Siirveynr /Fnaineer: 924 -9748 Dunsmore Land Surveyors N. 1115 Pines Road Spokane, WA 99206 Location: Located between the County roads of 13th Avenue, Lloyd Road, 16th Avenue and Havana Road, all being approximately 1,500' feet West of Carnahan Road within Section 23, Township 25 North, Range 43 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. proposal: To extend the preliminary plat approval of Wildwood Terrace based upon the applicants steady progress in preparing the site for development. II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION A. Site Size: 14.5 acres; Overall Proiert: Total of 169 units. B. Comprehensive Plan: Urban C. Site Characteristics: The site has eneven topography with significant relief features related to the past mining operations. The site is currently being prepared for development. Comprehensive Plan Designation: The Comprehensive Plan designates this areas as Urban and is within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. No changes in the plan have occurred since the 1984 approval. Page 11 PE-147 ZE -8 8 -8 4 Page 12 III. HISTORY /ANALYSIS This project received preliminary approval for 3 years to January 1, 1988. An extension of time request had not been submittedby the applicant prior to January 1st, 1988 as required by the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance, however, the applicant has been making steady progress towards filing the plat by surveying much of the development, grading the lots and filling portions of the old pit site. Without an extension the subdivision cannot be filed. Though not required to do so the Planning Department typically advises applicants that their project approvals need to be extended. In the case of this project the file was being used by the Department to investigate concerns associated with blasting during the summer of 1987 and no notice was sent to remind the applicants that preliminary plat status was soon to expire. The applicant did file a request for extension promptly after he was advised that the preliminary approval had lapsed. The Prosecuting Attorneys office advises that the Hearing Examiner Committee may review the proposal to determine if the applicant has made sufficient progress to warrant an extension consistent with the provisions of Section G of the Spokane County Siihrlivision Ordinance, Additionally, the Hearing Examiner Committee after considering public testimony may jn it's discretion excuse the inadvertant lane of preliminary nlat annrovaj. This would be based upon a finding that a new preliminary plat submittal is not necessary to protect or enhance the public health, safety and welfare. And also that no useful purpose would be served in requiring the applicant to resubmit the proposal. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW No SEPA review is required for Extension of Time requests. V. Copies of the original 1984 Planning Report are attached with conditions. VI. LEAD AGENCY SUMMARY The Planning Department believes substantial progress has been made towards finalizing portions of the development and supports the proposed extension of time. • I I-II- II r ; � O • a -- 6 - F_ J __-. e . MI WI tar _ — 11,7"; w . r-w. T- 1 1 _ 1 1 i e I • I J__J L_J- -- ?--i r - - r •- 1 LOT ,....• 2' 12 12 1 6 1 t 1 I 1.01 I tw. 1 - - r- 1 - - T In 1 1 1 1 . I a 1 I_ I 1 _J_ ^ _L__L 1 - r - - I LOT O3 I e 1 0 1 1 u 1 1 1 - ,J 2 J� • • !w - -c • - - - 1 • I ;• i y' I 1 1 I 1 L • r - ^ ---' - L O T O4 ! J t: e :;! y A V `1 +w - - - • -- • ' + • i • I 1 • _1..- � __- -- -- -- • ;. : LOT 5 a: , : O - • • e. I ] • iBLOCK . 7 'age 13 2 W A PROPOSED PLAT & MULTI FAM_Il r-Rokir- c_ c _u'2i:7c3 IN iii- ftil y'4 C^ EE:-.. :. c• • • O BLK 3 u 1 f2 tac E 1 i z 1 I I I I O z I . e i y :2 I . I y 1 2 1 1 1 L I I I I I I I 1 r1 1 1 1 I R SE 100' -i i 1A• 0 in 100 PLAN VIEIW WILDWOOD TEF J ' . I e j 5 14 tn. AVENUE 15 th. AVENUE - 16 th. AVENUE 0 .i Page 14 SECTION V: EXPIRATION OF PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL AMENDED AND ADOPTED MAPLE 1986 Approval of a preliminary subdivision shall automatically expire three (3) years after preliminary approval is granted unless a time extension Is applied for. In any case that the subdivider does not apply for a time extension when required under this ordinance, the preliminary approval expires and the subdivision is null and void. Upon application for time extension, the Planning Director or designee may administratively approve extensions for up to three year periods provided at least one of the following circumstances Is found to apply: 1. That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the last extension was granted and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval. 2. That the preliminary plat as approved remains consistent with the Generalized Comprehensive Plan for Spokane County in so far as density and other development provisions apply and the sponsor has taken substantial steps towards finalizing his plat which shall include but not be limited to: a) Surveying the lots within the development, b) Arranging for public services to the site, c) Obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary plat, d) The completion of studies or other requirements which were part of preliminary plat approval. 3. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This provision shall not apply to public utility extension which the project sponsor would normally fund. The Planning Director or designee shall circulate proposals for extensions of time to all affected agencies and departments for comments. Public notice of proposed extensions shall be provided in the County newspaper a minimum of ten (10) days prior to the issuance of a decision on the extension. Upon approval of an extension, the Planning Director or designee may attach any and all newly recommended conditions of County departments and agencies to the original proposal. The Planning Director or designee shall enter findings, conclusion and order for any proposed extension and notify parties of record of his /her decision. if the extension is to be granted subject to conditions which substantially alter the project as originally approved, the Planning Director or designee shall not decide upon the requested extension and shall forward the proposal to the Subdivision Hearing Examiner body for a public hearing on the matter. Appeals of administrative decisions of extension of time requests must be filed with the Spokane County Planning Department within ten (10) calendar days of the decision and shall be heard by the hearing body charged with the responsibility of reviewing and approving subdivision requests. The fee for such application shall be set by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners. Application forms and supporting data requirements for time extensions are required and will be provided upon the Subdivider's request, by the Planning Director. Page 15 STAFF REPORT August 23, 1984 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF RE: PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE- 1473 -84, ZE- 88-84, WILDWOOD TERRACE Agricultural to R -2 and Multiple Family Suburban SPONSOR: 535 -7619. SURVEYOR /ENGINEER 534 - 5272 Wallace Construction, Inc. S. 3009 Mt. Vernon Spokane, WA 99203 J. Ronald Dunmore S. 104 Freya Spokane, WA 99203 LOCATION: The proposal is located east and adjacent the Spokane City limits between the County roads of 13th Avenue, Lloyd Road, 16th Avenue and Havana Road, all being approximately 1,500 feet west of Carnahan Road; within Section 23, Township 25N, Range 43 E.W.M. of Spokane County, Washington. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: URBAN, within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. PROPOSAL: The sponsor is requesting to replat 14.5 acres of "WOODLAND TERRACE" into 27 lots for 22 divided duplexes and 5multiple- family structure and change the existing Agricultural to R -2 and M.F.S. City of Spokane Sewer and Water is also proposed to serve these lots. The duplex lots are proposed for "divided duplexes" (two attached single family dwellings) to allow separate ownership of each half of the duplex and the lot. 22 R -2 lots x 2 units - 44 families 5 MFS lots x 25 units a 125 families Total Families 169 II SITE PLAN INFORMATION A. Site Size: 14.5 Acres; being the existing property with Final Plat "Woodland Terrace" as follows: Block 8; Block 9; Block 10; Block 19; Block 20 except Lots 7 4 8; Lots 7 -9 and 11 4 12 of Block 21; Block 23 except Lots 4 - and 9; Block 24 except Lots 5 4 6 and 7 4 8; including some County dedicated roads and alleys to tie vacated. B. Site Charadteristics: Generally flat with partial tree cover south of 14th Avenue and treeless north of 14th Avenue. The proposal site is vacant. Page 16 STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 II. SITE PLAT INFORMATION (Cont'd) PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE C. Neighborhood Characteristics: The proposal is located in an area that is predominately undeveloped having a semi -rural character. The site is part of an older Final Plat - Subdivision with "non - conforming" 50 foot wide lots. The Spokane City limit is adjacent at west boundary of the proposal along the east side of Havana. Approximately seven (7) single family dwellings and one (1) single -wide trailer exist adjacent south and west of the proposal. The dwellings are located on two or more of the 50 foot wide lots to allow space for each dwelling and septic tank drainfield, except the trailer. The area is also generally flat and partly tree covered. An abandoned and deep gravel pit is located just north of the proposal (within the sponsor's optioned property). This vicinity of the County and City has yet to develop to full density as platted. This is believed to be due to the lack of City Sewer and due the Gravel Pit influence. D. Agricultural Summary: The Comprehensive Plan has identified this area as URBAN which precludes any agricultural land uses for this site. E. Zoning: Proposal - Reclassify to R -2 for two attached single family dwellings ( "divided duplexes ") except Block 1 of the preliminary plat is proposed to reclassify to MPS for 5 structures with 25 dwelling units each (5 x 25 - 1 25). Site - the existing zoning is Agricultural, 1958 for Final Plat "Woodland Terrace." North - the existing zoning is Agricultural, 1958 and beyond County's 12th Avenue is Mining (MZ), 1958. Note: Where Agricultural Zone changes to Mining at 12th Avenue (which is the City's 10th Avenue if extended east). East - the existing zoning is Agricultural, 1958 and beyond Carnahan Street is MFS, 1979 and R -1, 1979 for "Kahuna Hills First Addition." Southeast - South the existing zoning is Agricultural, 1958, and adjacent and east of Carnahan Road is R -1, 1976 for " Kahuna Hills Addition" south of 14th Avenue. the existing zoning is Agricultural, 1958 for 5 acre tracts of Final Plat "Happy's Five Acre Tracts" Page 17 STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473-84 WILDWOOD TERRACE I1. SITE PLAT INFORMATION (Cont'd) E. Zoning: (Cont'd) West - the existing zoning across Havana Road in the City of Spokane is City "R -1" (a zone for single family dwellings which allows lots as small as 7,200 eq.ft.) for Final Plat "Tudor Heights Addition ", whose lots are 50x130' or 6,500 eq.ft." F. Land Use: Site - Vacant with some tree cover south of 14th Avenue and predominately treeless north of 14th Avenue. North - Vacant treeless and adjacent is an abandoned and deep gravel pit with vertical pit walls. The pit is on lands optioned for purchase by the sponsor and part of a large ownership. East - Vacant which beyond 400+ ft. begins to slope downward to Carnahan. South - Mostly vacant and party tree covered, except four (4) single family dwellings and one (1) single -wide trailer. The dwelling south of 16th Avenue is on just less than 5 acres with large animal keeping. Two of the dwellings are each located on 2 lots combined and one dwelling on a portion of 4 lots combined. However, the single -wide trailer is located on a single lot 50 ft. by 129.5 ft. being 6,475 aq.ft. West Mostly vacant and partly tree covered, except three (3) single - family dwellings. One dwelling is on 2 existing lots combined, two dwellings are each on 3 existing lots combined, and one dwelling across Havana at 12th Avenue in the City. Note: The lots in the City are predominately vacant with few homes along 12th Avenue until 500+ ft. west of Havana we find substantial development of single family dwellings on combined 50 ft. lots. Also llth Avenue in the City is being improved (curbs, sidewalks, paving) to accommodate new residential dwellings. G. Comprehensive Plan Designation: The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as URBAN and the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. The proposal does comply with the Decision Guideline policies for "fill -in" development and land use compatibility. (See Special Information below for detailed comments). Page 18 STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 - PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE I1. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (Cont'd) J. Special Information: Circulation - The proposed design of the Preliminary Plat does not include any additional road dedi- cations and proposes to use the existing dedicated roadways within the Final Plat - "Woodland Terrace". Some of the dedicated roadways and alleys within the proposal site are designed to be vacated. The Preliminary Plat is a REPLAT of this recorded final plat, where the existing "non - conforming" 50 foot wide lots are being combined to create R -2 lots 13,000 sq.ft. (typical size) and MPS lots 64,050 sq.ft. The County Engineer is recommending that 14th, 15th, and 16th Avenues, Lloyd, and Morrill be improved to "Access Standards" for the Preliminary Plat's portion of these roadways. Sidewalks are being required along the north side of 14th Avenue as required of multi - family lots. Havana Road is totally within the City Limits and is designated as a "residential street" similar to the County designation of "Access Standard." Planning staff did not receive any specific comments from the City of Spokane (we had mailed two notices). Staff telephoned the City Engineering and City Utility Departments to discuss concerns we had about Havana. Mr. Angelo Baumban of the City Utility Department verbally recommended the following: 1. Require the sponsor to acquire County equivalent of Road Improvement District petitions from adjacent property owners along Havana and build Havana (full width) with sidewalks on both sides for the length of the proposal. No RID agreements would be allowed to build Havana at a later time. 3. No Bond would be allowed prior to filing the final plat, that the Havana improvements would have to be completed prior to releasing any Spokane County "Occupancy Permits" for building permits in this County Subdivision. Staff indicated and does not concur with these recommendations for the following reasons 1. Only two lots are adjacent Havana (one R -2 Lot and one MFS Lot) and both of these lots are designed for side yards adjacent Havana; additionally, staff is restricting direct access onto Havana from either of these lots. Page 19 STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (Coned) J. Special Information (Coned) Circulation (Coned) 2.. Road Improvements for the County roads are adequate to facilitate the impacts of the proposed development and accommodate its vehicular and pedestrian traffic, which provides for traffic flow east to Carnahan, west to 12th Avenue in the City (same as 14th Avenue extended), north (two blocks) on Havana, and south on Havana and on Carnahan. 3. Any improvements to Havana would be for the purposes of the general public and pursuant of recent court decisions would require the general public to bear the expense of such improvements and not the developer. 4. The two lots adjacent Havana would have to pay their proportional share of a road improvement district if and only when such improvements were authorized. Staff's conclusion is that no conditions are necessary regarding Havana prior to the filing of this final plat or issuing building permits on these lots; that the County Engineer conditions provide adequate protection and assurances for circulation and safety for traffic movement. Density The existing density allowed in the recorded "Woodland Terrace" Final Plat is one dwelling per 6,500 sq.ft. (typical 50 ft. by 130 ft.) as "non - conforming" agricultural zoned lots. The Agricultural Zone allows SINGLE -WIDE TRAILERS, which would fit on these 50 ft. wide lots when City sewer is available. Additionally small square footage single - family dwellings would also fit on these 50 ft. lots with City sewer. The proposed 22 R -2 lots involve 43 of these existing 50 ft. lots; therefore, the difference in potential density is one additional family (22 lots x 2 "attached" single family dwellings - 44 families as compared to the potential 43 single -wide trailers and /or small dwellings). The proposed 5 multi - family lots involve 36 of the existing 50 ft. lots; therefore the potential increase in density is 89 additional families (5 lots x 25 unit apartments = 125 families as compared to a potential 36 single -wide trailers and /or small dwellings). Staff finds that the proposed density is compatible due to the design and location of the proposed apartment buildings and due . to the predominately undeveloped characteristic of the adjacent lands. Page 20 STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473-84 WILDWOOD TERRACE II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (Cont'd) Land -Use Compatibility (R -2 Lots) - Staff finds that the sponsor's request to make the following changes to the Preliminary Plat site is compatible with existing adjacent land -uses and would appear to improve the aesthetics of the area by: 1. Eliminating the existing Agricultural zone, 2. Reclassifying the zone to R -2 a. prohibiting single -wide trailers b. prohibiting unlimited animal keeping, 3. Constructing two "attached" single family dwellings on each R -2 Lot (defined as "divided duplexes. ") (MFS Lots)- Staff finds the requested changes to Block 1 of the Preliminary Plat to be compatible with the existing and potential land -uses for the following reasons: 1. The Agricultural Zone would be eliminated. 2. That zone would be reclassified to MFS a. which prohibits single -wide trailers b. which prohibits unlimited animal keeping. 3. The sponsor proposes to build "L" shaped multi - family apartments with the buildings located away from Havana and 14th Avenue. 4. The sponsor propoaes.landscaping and landscape screening to be installed to complement the existing single family homes adjacent the proposal. 5. The apartment buildings will be limited to 2 -story height above the existing ground level. 6. That 4 and 5 above would create building heights and building scale and open area that is similar to and compatible with the existing single family dwellings adjacent 14th Avenue and Havana. (Both R -2 k MFS Lots) - Staff finds the overall proposal would improve the land -use compatibility and aesthetics of the near vicinity for the following reasons: 1. The area -wide neighborhood and public safety and welfare will be improved by a. developing the vacant and weed covered lots, b. constructing curb and paved roads, c. 'constructing a sidewalk on the north side of 14th Avenue. Page 21 - ::TAFF 11201:T, Au 1984 PE 1473 - 84 WILDWOOD TERRACE II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (Cont'd) Land -Use Compatibility (Cont'd) 1. (Cont'd) d. extending the public water and sewer systems into this undeveloped area. e. inatalling additional fire hydrants,. f. constructing a security /safety fence around the dangeroua vertical sidewalls of the abandoned pit. 2. This proposal is part of a larger ownership extending northward to 8th Avenue and eastward to Carnahan Road 120+ acres which includes the abandoned pit. The development of this preliminary plat will facilitate ongoing efforts to further develop additional phases of this larger ownership and thereby progressively accomplish "fill -in" development by: a. providing support to rehabilitate the existing pit site, b. providing support for more intensive development northward in the rehabilitated pit and pit area, c. providing support for "transition" development eastward to Carnahan, d. providing support for continued expansion of the sewer and water systems northwad and eastward, e. providing for improved tax base and for more efficient use of area -wide public services and facilities. Multi - Family Setbacks - Special setbacks are being recommended for the apartments along Havana and 14th Avenue to assure single family compatibility and proper "transition" from apartments to single family and the future two attached single family.:dwellings ( "divided duplexes. ") Additionally the sponsor proposes to orient as many of the apartment units toward the north overlooking the future rehabilitated pit and development on the Valley Floor further northward. These apartments will have a Substantial view as the elevation drops 100 feet. The setbacks for the lot at Havana and 14th Avenue will prohibit any building within a rectangle 150 feet north of 14th Avenue and 100 feet east of Havana - -- providing a guaranteed 15,000 sq.ft. open -space area at the northeast corner of 14th and Havana. The setbacks along 14th Avenue will prohibit any apartment building within 85 feet of 14th Avenue centerline. Landscaping - Landscaping and landscape screening is being proposed by the sponsor and is being recommended as conditions of approval to assure compatibility between the existing single family homes and the proposed apartments. 4 to 5 feet irrigated evergreen screening (as Arbivita) is being required along the west side of Lot 1, Block 1 adjacent Havana, except for necessary "clear view" triangle at 14th and Havana. Landscape with partial evergreen screening is being required at the southerly end of each apartment building. Page 22 STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (Cont'd) Landscaping (Cont'd) NOTE: The proposed "L" shaped apartments will place the top of the "L" toward 14th Avenue and the bottom of the "L" toward the Pit; therefore only the end of the apartments will face the existing single family dwellings along 14th and creating the optimum "open- space" between 14th Avenue and apartments (the bulk of the apartments will be at the north side of the lots adjacent the Pit and not adjacent 14th Avenue). Pit - The abandoned gravel (basalt) pit has a vertical sidewall at the north end of Lot 3, Block 1 with a vertical drop of approximately 75 to 100 feet with the Pit walls further west and east of that point progressively decrease from being vertical. The sponsor indicates his intent to rehabilitate the pit which would not eliminate the more vertical pit walls and that the pit is far too large to fill in; therefore, he proposes to install a substantial security /safety fence around the dangerous portions of the pit bluff and staff is recommending conditions that would require such improvement in conjunction with any bulding permit issued in the entire proposal. School - The proposal is in the School District #81 with elementary schools within 1/2 and 3/4 miles of the site - -- Sheridan School at Freya and 6th Avenue to the northwest and Lincoln Heights School at Thor and 22nd Avenue to the southwest. With most direct pedestrian route being west on 12th Avenue, then north or south on Freya. We did not receive any comments from the District of the notice mailed to them. Parks - The report "Planning for Park" (revised 1976) indicates this proposal is located at the south perimeter of the "Alcott" neighborhood, which does not plan for any park at the preliminary plat site. Water Supply - City of Spokane will provide water. An approved Water Plan will be required prior to finalizing this preliminary plat. A Water main and fire hydrant is already extended into the site. Sewage Disposal - The County Utilities Department has approved public sewer with provisions for connecting to City Sewer. Sewer mains exist at 12th (same as 14th) and Havana. Note: Both sewer and water service must have Boundary Review Board approval prior to connecting to these water and sewer mains. Page 23 STAFF REPORT, ;ust 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (Cont'd) Fire - The proposal is within Fire District #1. The Fire District and County Building and Safety Department (Fire Marshal) are required to approve fire protection provisions prior to finalizing the preliminary plat by reviewing the Water Plan for hydrants, hydrant spacing, water flow capacity and emergency access. Cultural Resources - None have been identified. III. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS A. Land Use: Staff finds the proposed replat of the Final Plat - "Woodland Terrace" for 22 lots for two "attached" single family dwelling (divided duplexes) and 5 apartments with 25 units each to be 'compatible with the existing and proposed land -uses, as conditioned. B. Zoning: Staff finds the requested zone reclassification fro. Agricultural to R -2 and RFS to be compatible with the proposed uses and existing land uses, as conditioned. That the reclassification is supported by "changed conditions" as adoption of the Urban Category in the Comprehensive Plan, adoption of the Wastewater Management Plan, adoption of the ASA Overlay zone and the availability of City sewer and water service. That the zone change will improve the land -use compatability and aesthetics by prohibiting unlimited animal keeping, prohibiting single -wide trailers, and allowing development suited for "view lots" and more efficient land -use as "divided duplexes." C. Comprehensive Plan: Staff finds the proposal meets the purpose and intent of the URBAN designation; as "fill -in" development for the Urban Category,for the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA), and for the existing public services and facilities of the near vicinity. More specifically, the proposal will support further "fill -in" development of ,the large island of undeveloped land and provide for a "variety of lifestyle" while "improving" the land -use compatibility and asethetics of the vicinity. The public health, safety and general welfare is found to be "improved" with the development of the site (i.e., roads, water, sewer, fire protection, Pit safety and improved aesthetics of vacant undeveloped land). IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and has been reviewed by the Planning staff. No significant adverse environmental impacts were judged to exist. Possible slight adverse environmental impacts were identified on the checklist in the following categories: earth, air, water, flora, fauna, noise, light and glare, land use, population, housing, transportation /circulation, public services, and utilities. Page 24 STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (Cont'd) NOTE: Staff concluded that developing the site as proposed appears to eliminate existing impacts on the physical environment: . The County Subdivision Administrator issued a "Proposed Declaration of Non - Significance ", and it was circulated to other agenciee of jurisdiction and no comments have been received as of the printing of this report; therefore, recommends a "Final Declaration of Non - Significance" be signed by the Hearing Examiner Committee Chairperson. V. LEAD AGENCY RECOMMENDATION The County Planning Department, in considering the above information and conclusions, and further considering that forthcoming public testimony would not identify unanticipated and unresolvable problems, does RECOMMEND APPROVAL. This recommendation of approval is, in part, based on the following recommended "conditions of approval ", and therefore staff additionally recommends that the following conditions be attached to the Hearing Examiner Committee approval, if approval is granted. Staff further commends the proposal and its apparent "quality design" for a unique lifestyle - -- that is seen as a positive and complimentary development for the community. VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommmended. COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. That the Plat be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and /or attached sheets as noted. Phasing be allowed as approved by the County Subdivision Administrator. 2. That preliminary plat of record approval is for the property described in the Legal Description, signed and stamped by the sponsor's licensed land surveyor, being part of the application for this proposal. 3. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for three (3) years to September 1, 1987. The applicant may request an Extension -of -Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. Such applications should demonstrate the progress made toward finalizing this preliminary plat. If an Extension -or -Time is not requested in a timely manner or said Extension is not granted, then the preliminary plat and the is NULL 4 VOID. 4. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (3) days of final disposition of this application, • and prior to any on -site improvements unless the applicant(s) /sponsor(s) choose to file a notarized Waiver of Notice of Action with the Spokane County Planning Department. Page 25 STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Cont'd) 5. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C.RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SEC), a proposed declaration of non - significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the physical environment; a finding is hereby made that no probable significant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of this project; and a Final Declaration of Non - Significance is hereby to be issued. 6. That a Final Plat name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 7. That appropriate road names be indicated, and approved by the County Subdivision Administrator. 8. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat,for distribution to the County Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of said utility easements by said utility companies must be received with the submittal of the final plat. 9. That a plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier, fire protection district and Spokane County Building 4 Safety Department (Fire Marshal). Said WATER PLAN must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The Health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), fire protection district, and County Building R Safety Department (Fire Marshal) will certify with signature on said WATER PLAN, prior to the filing of the final plat or final plat of each phase of the preliminary plat. Said certification shall indicate that said plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. Said WATER PLAN and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify that appropriate contractual • arrangements or agreements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in said final plat, in accordance with the approved WATER PLAN and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within said final plat. The arrangements or agreements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily compiete the approved water system. Page 26 STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473-84 WILDWOOD TERRACE VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Cont'd) 9. (cont'd) The final plat dedication will contain the following statement: "the public water system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building 4 Safety Department, and water purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 10. That no building permit will be issued for any lot within the Final Plat until certified by a Washington State licensed engineer "that the eater system has been installed pursuant the approved WATER PLAN for the FInal Plat ", signed and stamped by said engineer. The certification may be in the form of a letter but is preferred to be certified on a copy of said WATER PLAN.as a schematic map showing the "As Built" water plan. 11. That a current certificate of title be furnished the County Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 12. That the following statement be placed in the final plat dedication: "no more than one structure be placed on Lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purpose of creating additional lots, ownerships, or building sites without first filing a replat." 13. Upon filing the final plat the zone change shall be finalized and the existing Agricultural zone classification shall be changed to R -2, except Preliminary Plat Block 1 be changed to MFS. 14. That prior to filing the final plat, a specific landscape plan with irrigation system be prepared by a qualified professonal and submitted to the Spokane County Subdivision Administrator for review and approval with provisions for: a. Substantial landscape screening along the west side of Lot 1, Block 1, which provide visual screening of existing or potential residences on lots west across Havana (Note, total screening may not be required for the full length of Lot 1): The screening shall be living evergreen trees or shrubs and planting height of 4 to 5 feet of a specie that will grow to a height of at least 10 feet, such as arborvitae. A "clear view triangle" is required at 14th Avenue and Havana. b. A partial landscape and landscape screening is required along the south "end" of each apartment building. Page 27 STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Cont'd) 15. That a building setback is required 85 feet north of 14th Avenue centerline for all lots within Block 1 and a setback at the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, being a rectangle 150 feet north -south and 100 feet east -west. 16. That the building setbacks be designated on the Final Plat map and referenced in the Final Plat dedication, as aproved by the County Subdivision Administrator. 17. That the MPS lots be substantially developed as indicated on the "concept site plane" for the apartments, as approved by the County Subdivision Administrator. The purpose being to assure the general concept of "L" shaped apartments, located at the north end of the lots, and the open -apace oriented toward 14th Avenue. 18. That the profile or height of the apartments shall not exceed 2 -story plus foundation from the present ground level. The purpose being to prevent 3 or more story structures above the existing ground elevation and maintain a compatible profile with the existing and future adjacent dwellings south and west. 19. That the final plat dedication indicate: "No direct access shall be allowed onto Havana from Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 ". NOTE: A crash gate for fire protection is acceptable for Lot 1, Block 1 onto Havana, if necessary. 20. That as part of the landscaping plan, a plan for 6 ft. security /safety fence along the perimeter of the Pit bluff shall be submitted by the sponsor to the County Subdivision Administrator for review and approval. The intent is to provide a fence for those areas of the Pit bluff owned by the sponsor where a child or person could slip and not be able to recover due to the steepness of the pit sides or sidewalls. 21. That the final plat dedication reference to or include provisions of operation and maintenance of the Pit Safety Fence by the owners of adjacent property and /or lots. 22. That prior to issuing the "Final Inspection" or "Occupancy" Permit for ! building permit within this preliminary plat the 6 ft. Pit Safety Fence or equivalent safety provision shall be constructed. The intent is to assure that any new families in this development will have existing provisions for safety regarding the Pit. 23. That the fence shall have posted warning signs. 24. That provision for "divided duplexes" are approved for the R -2 lots. Page 28 STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473-84 WILDWOOD TERRACE VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) COUNTY PLANNING CONDITIONS ( Cont'd) 25. That appropriate "divided duplex" lot lines shall be designated on the Final Plat as approved by the Spokane County Subdivision Administrator. COUNTY ENGINEERING CONDITIONS 26. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record, as approved by the County Engineer. 27. That plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 28. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final. plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 29. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plane and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 30. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right -of -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 31. All construction within the existing or proposed public Right -of -Way is to be completed prior to filing each final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 32. A statement must appear in the dedicatory language of the final plat: "that individual driveway access permits be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system." 33. That all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. Page 29 STAFF REPORT, August 23 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) COUNTY ENGINEERING CONDITIONS (Cont'd) 34. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees in new construction. 35. That the County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impacts of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the roadway improvements herein specified. 36. That Public Road Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section be: "Section Number 1 for 14th Avenue north side minimum paving width "Access standard ". "Section Number 2 for 14th Avenue south side minimum paving width "Access standard ". "Section Number 2 for 15th, 16th, Lloyd 8 Morrill minimum paving width "Access standard ". 37. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from Lot 1, Block 1, Lot 1, Block 2 onto Havana. 38. Existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and curbed to Spokane County standards. 39. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. 40. Applicant shall petition the Board of County Commissioners to vacate those public road right -of -ways which are proposed for use as portion of lots. These vacations must be accomplished prior to filing any portion of the plat which proposes use of road right -of -way parcels. 41. Any petition to vacate county road right - of - way shall be for vacation of full width right -of -ways. • COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 42. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 43. That connection be made to City of Spokane's sanitary sewer system. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS 44. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS). Page 30 STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS (Cont'd) 45. Prior to filing any final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on each plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems are prohibited." 46. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage systems shall not be authorized." COUNTY BUILDING 4 SAFETY DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 47. That the WATER PLAN shall show the location of each fire hydrant or fire prevention facility and must comply with Chapter 10.04 of the Spokane County Uniform Fire Code Ordinance, as amended. 48. That the WATER PLAN shall specify the gallons per minute for each fire hydrant at residual pressure of no leas than 20 p.s.i. (a minimum pressure). 49. That the Water Purveyor and Fire District shall sign the WATER PLAN prior to County Building 4 Safety Department's review. Subject 's•.•ts". 1•0" Form 327-C.R. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ? Inter-office Communication-1:*t To ht 72,XL From rre/L-; • , . c- 726 14L7 _ et, 0 0,--M Al c i2 - 7 , _ eyeep / 5 -.... a ,. " 2 g4/V: a'ovr , e mi Co e1/405 7 ::. itA57 so.' ( /1 A fAl - E/ /he/A-x/4 - 47 2 c li)_iaitZ •,' . /C)o R5gfir5 /lace_ See--)7 Akitz") i r. 4 I (la-n r 4 a- t2/ ._ /23/21Z-7k dAtoe /1 ,4 d E4 OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER • j LD ev tel-er Pfiftf04 • • • <rf r • :.•01,g r•ef.'4 r SEP 1 0 1987 Sewer: LLOYD STREET: 15th Ave. (C0) /14th Ave. (Co) 14TH AVENUE (Co): Havana St. to Lloyd St. 15TH AVENUE (Co): Havana St. to Lloyd St. Water: WILDW00D TERRACE: (overall plat) LLOYD STREET: 15th Ave. to 14th Ave. 13TH AVENUE: Cuba St. to Havana St. 14TH AVENUE (Co): Havana St. to Lloyd St. 15TH AVENUE (Co): Havana St. to Lloyd St. RECEIVED SEP 21 198 rO ENGINE 13094, 4941 nE, Q O 0 George V. Thompson East 518 High Drive Spokane, WA 99203 RE: Public Sewer_and Water Systems Serving �ildwood Terrace #1 Dear Mr. Thompson: In regard to your request to build the above public sewer and water systems, your plans, as prepared by Senske & Associates, are hereby approved for construction of said public facilities as shown on the following sheets: LLOY (1) 23 -25 -43 14TH (1) 23 -25 -43 15TH (1) 23 -25 -43 Water Plan LLOY (1) 23 -25 -43 13TH (4) 22 -25 -43 14TH (1) 23 -25 -43 15TH (1) 23 -25 -43 Permission to construct is conditional in that Owner(s) assumes responsibility for securing subsequent approval of plat, street geometrics, and drainage provisions. Owner(s) also assumes responsibility for all liabilities and costs which might arise from this construction due to later revisions or changes occurring in the subsequent approval process. Construction is subject to the following conditions: General. 1. Upon receipt of this letter, you must contact the Public Works Department Engineering Division Field Office, North 1423 Normandie Street, 456 -4390, in order to arrange a mutually agreeable Start Work Date. When you receive the written, "Notification to Commence Work ", signed by the City of Spokane, Supervising Engineer - Construction, you will then have ten (10) working days, from the agreed upon date indicated in the "Notification to Commence Work ", in which to commence project construction. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Brad W. Blegen, P.E., Director - City Engineer Larry J. Neil, P.E., Supervisory Engineer - Design Skywalk Level Municipal Building / Spokane, Washington 99201 -3343 / (509) 456 -4300 George V. Thompson 4941, 13094 Page 2 2. All workmust bedone underthe supervision of the Engineering Division and in accordance with the 1984 Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction, the Amendments thereto, the City of Spokane Supplemental Specifications thereto, and the Plans as approved. Permission is granted with the understanding you will obtain all necessary permits, pay costs of engineering and inspection, replacement of any monuments disturbed, and any necessary changes in existing facilities, including replacement of any road surfacing involved. 3. Regarding the extension of City services to unincorporated properties, City policy requires that an Annexation Petition and Covenant be signed by the Owner(s) of said properties prior to issuing permits for connection to the City sewer and /or water system. These documents are available at the City Planning Department. 4. If these facilities are constructed, they must be inspected by the Engineering Division of this department for acceptance into the City System. 5. Prior to final acceptance of these facilities as part of the City System, you shall provide the Field Engineering Division with the following items: A. A complete set of "As Built" drawings, Construction Notes. B. An itemized statement of the cost of materials, equipment, labor and engineering. C. Payment of all fees and charges. 6. This approval is good until October 15, 1987, unless otherwise indicated herein. At the end of that time, if construction has not commenced, this approval is considered to be automatically cancelled and you must then submit a new request for project approval. 7. All work must be completed within thirty (30) days after the start of construction. 8. When the utility will be incorporated in the existing or planned future right of way, the Owner(s) are required to initiate the appropriate enfranchisement procedure with Spokane County, in order to assure the City's continuing right of access, for the emplacement, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of the City Sewer and Water System, as shown on the approved plans. The emplacement of the Sewer and Water System will be in accordance with City Standards for Underground Utility Location wherever possible: George V. Thompson 4941, 13094 Page 3 Sewer. 1. Side sewer stubs constructed as part of this project must be inspected. Side sewer permits will not be issued until stubs have been accepted as part of the City Sewer System. Water. 2. Side sewer stubs shall be installed to the property line prior to the improvement and paving of the street. 1. You shall haveyour engineer establish and set street centerline stakesand grade. You will pay costs of chlorination and final connection to the City Water System. These activities are accomplished by the Water Division. Tap applications shall be made and paid for under our normal water service request procedure. Service lines shall be installed to the property line prior to the improvement and paving of the street. Tap, service line and meter box installation will be accomplished by the Water Division to and at the property line; extension beyond the property line, plus all excavation = and backfill will be accomplished by the developer. 4. No other utility is to be installed within five feet (5') parallel to the water mains or water service lines. - The area of construction is located outside corporate limits, therefore, you will be required to coordinate your efforts with the Spokane County Engineer's Office and to comply with the following conditions and whatever additional requirements may be necessary in order to proceed with construction. County Liaison. 1. Comply with traffic control measures imposed by Spokane County Engineer. 2. Obtain necessary Spokane County right of way excavation permits for construction. The repair and replacement of paving, curbing, etc., is to be effected in accordance with County standards. 3. Provide County approval of platting and franchise for the emplacement, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of a City Sewer and Water System as shown on your approved plans. George V. Thompson Page 4 If you have any questions, please contact Eldon Brown in the Public Works Department at 456 -4300. EWB /gf Sincerely, Brad W. Blegen, P.E. Public Works Director - City Engine -r 4941, 13094 By Larry N:'il, P.E. Supervisory Engineer - Design Attachments: (1) Approved Public Sewer and Water Plans . cc: Public Works file - Angelo Bomben, Supervising Engineer - Construction (3 Sets Plans) ,. Larry Neil, Supervising Engineer - Design Eldon Brown, Design Services Engineer (1 Set Plans) - Patti Small, Design Services George Miller, Design Engineer, Water & Hydroelectric Services (Mylar Reproducible and 4 Water Plans) Dave Mandyke, Project Coordinator - Rich.Davis, Permit Coordinator - (1 Set Plans) Jim Simpson, Director, Real Estate & Contract Compliance Lyle Balderson, Manager, Planning & Zoning . Emmett Shearer, Assistant City Attorney Gale Olrich, Director, Wastewater Management . Gary Lindsey, Supervisor, Wastewater Management Maintenance Division Don Soehren, Supervisor, Commercial Accounts Dennis Kroll, Spokane County Health District Dennis Scott, Spokane County Public Works Director Ron Hormann, Acting Spokane County Engineer Tom Yake, Spokane County Construction Engineer Verril Smale, Engineering Administrator, Spokane County Engineer's Office vGary Kennally, Spokane County Planning & Traffic Engineer Bill Dobratz, Director, Spokane County Utilities Department Jim Legat, Utilities Engineer, Spokane County Utilities Department Linda M. Michalson, Secretary - Spokane County Boundary Review Board Adams & Clark, Inc. (1 Set Plans) Atten: Daniel B. Clark, P.E. West 1803 Maxwell Avenue Spokane, WA 99201 Senske & Associates, Inc. Atten: Daniel B. Clark, P.E. West 1803 Maxwell Avenue Spokane, WA 99201 (1 Set Plans) ,SEP 1 7 1987 RECEWED S 2 1.1987 'oKn^ 'TV ENGINEEr Taylor Engineering West 55 Mission Avenue, Suite 101 Spokane, WA 99201 Attention: Mark A. Aronson, Project Leader RE: Public Water System Serving Air Cargo Delivery Inc. Dear Mr. Aronson: Construction is subject to the following conditions: General. 6864 o �p N C, w Q 'I S 0 H 0 In regard to your request to build the above public water system, on behalf of your client, Walls Construction Inc., your plan is hereby approved for construction of said public facilities as shown on the following approved drawing: Water: AIR CARGO WATER SUPPLY: Fosseen Road: Sta. 0 +39 to Sta. 2 +70 FOSS(1) 33 -25 -42 Permission to construct is conditional in that Owner(s) assumes responsibility for securing subsequent approval of plat, street geometrics, and drainage provisions. Owner(s) also assumes responsibility for all liabilities and costs which might arise from this construction due to later revisions or changes occurring in the subsequent approval process. 1. Upon receipt of this letter, you must contact the Public Works Department Engineering Division Field Office, North 1423 Normandie Street, 456 -4390, in order to arrange a mutually agreeable Start Work Date. When you receive the written, "Notification to Commence Work ", signed by the City of Spokane, Supervising Engineer - Construction, you will then have ten (10) working days, from the agreed upon date indicated in the "Notification to Commence Work ", in which to commence project construction. 2. All workmust bedone underthe supervision of the Engineering Division and in accordance with the 1984 Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction, the Amendments thereto, the City of Spokane Supplemental Specifications thereto, and the Plans as approved. Permission is granted with the understanding you will obtain all necessary permits, pay costs of engineering and inspection, replacement of any monuments disturbed, and any necessary changes in existing facilities, including replacement of any road surfacing involved. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Brad W. Blegen, P.E., Director - City Engineer Larry J. Neil, P.E., Supervisory Engineer - Design Skywalk Level Municipal Building / Spokane, Washington 99201 -3343 / (509) 456 -4300 Taylor Engineering 6864 Page 2 3. Regarding the extension of City services to unincorporated properties, City pol icy requires that an Annexation Petition and Covenant be signed by the Owner(s) of said properties prior to issuing permits for connection to the City sewer and /or water system. These documents are available at the City Planning Department. 4. If these facilities are constructed, they must be inspected by the Engineering Division of this department for acceptance into the City System. 5. Prior to final acceptance of these facilities as part of the City System, you shall provide the Field Engineering Division with the following items: A. A complete set of "As Built" drawings, Construction Notes. B. An itemized statement of the cost of materials, equipment, labor and engineering. C. Payment of all fees and charges. 6. This approval is good until December 31, 1987, unless otherwise indicated herein. At the end of that time, if construction has not commenced, this approval is considered to be automatically cancelled and you must then submit a new request for project approval. 7. All work must be completed within thirty (30) days after the start of construction. 8. You shall have your engineer establish and set street centerline stakes and grade. 9. You will pay costs of chlorination and final connection to the City Water System. These activities are accomplished by the Water Division. 10. Tap applications shall be made and paid for under our normal water service request procedure. Service lines shall be installed to the propertyline prior to the improvement and paving of the street. Tap, service 1 ine and meter i nstal l ati on wi l l be accomplished by the Water Di vi si on to and at the property line; extension beyond the property line, plus all excavation and backfill will be accomplished by the developer. 11. No other utility is to be installed within five (5) feet parallel to the water mains or water service lines. 12. The City will pay the difference in cost between 6" and 8" ductile iron pipe. Taylor Engineering 6864 Page 3 The area of construction1s located outside corporate limits, therefore, you will be required to coordinate yourefforts with the Spokane County Engineer's Office and to comply with the following conditions and whatever additional requirements may be necessary in order to proceed with construction. County Liaison. 1. Comply with traffic control measures imposed by Spokane County Engineer. 2. Obtain necessary Spokane County right of way excavation permits for construction. The repair and replacement of paving, curbing, etc., is to be effected in accordance with County standards. If you have any questions, please contact Eldon Brown in the Publ is Works Department at 456 -4300. Sincerely, Brad W. Blegen, P.E. Public Works Director - City Engineer By: Larry 1D. Neil, P.E. Supervisory Engineer - Design EWB /gf Attachments: (1) Approved Public Water Plans cc: Public Works file Angelo Bomben, Supervising Engineer - Construction (3 Sets Plans) Larry Neil, Supervising Engineer - Design Eldon Brown, Design Services Engineer (1 Set Plans) Patti Small, Design Services George Miller, Design Engineer, Water & Hydroelectric Services (Mylar Reproducible and 4 Water Plans) Dave Mandyke, Project Coordinator Rich Davis, Permit Coordinator (1 Set Plans) Jim Simpson, Director, Real Estate & Contract Compliance Lyle Balderson, Manager, Planning & Zoning Emmett Shearer, Assistant City Attorney Don Soehren, Supervisor, Commercial Accounts Dennis Scott, Spokane County Public Works Engineer Ron Hormann, Acting Spokane County Engineer Tom Yake, Spokane County Construction Engineer Verril Smale, Engineering Administrator, Spokane County Engineer's Office Vary Kennally, Spokane County Planning & Traffic Engineer Bill Dobratz, Director, Spokane County Utilities Department Jim Legat, Utilities Engineer, Spokane County Utilities Department Linda M. Michelson, Secretary, Spokane County Boundary Review Board Walls Construction Inc. (1 Set Plans) Atten: Al Walls North 1010 Lake Road Spokane, WA 99212 SjPOn.NC (OLIN'' CCU., HOUSE Gentlemen: GSN /set Attachment 5/30/4 SEN .3 IsE t Assoc Thank you. art aintaTnE 'Co d ;rine OrrzCE 0r COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER Snonasl. , 'WASnINO'rov 99260 RE: ky /f_Q \•s/op 7,6 ACE A review of the road, drainage, and parking plans for the above- refer- enced plat, short plat, binding site plan, and /or building permit has been accomplished. Areas of concern to us are indicated in red on the attached - prints. Please make the corrections and resubmit them to this office in order that the review process may proceed. When the plans are resubmitted, mark all changes on the revised print in color. If you have any questions about this review, please contact us at 456 -3600. Sincerely, Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer I� a s NeI.on, P.E. Plann'ig Engineer do c/ s Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3& I f f Y l4T • f � �t k 9i 1 P 4fl i�.d f4A vai^" �•' .T �':`m R I Y S { I I q Ii 7 1 i II l t 1. C I; I. y i .._ x l 1 { + 1 rq I r r 'N ,, yy i f ^ u �• ' � + x' 3i.(I I% 5L�0.I6 i\� . �It Y t �� g Ij7 C 4 I T _ ASC At9f �ti Yw iDlY l Ihy - 1 ' 'X�' �RS ' t�l, Nt 9i- i! 4 ` + f Yi M 1' . fir". I� wt*', 1 1 L 2 t 1 !pH dC i {ti n ya . f ' . .. - ` .. � p° , ' : vA 9 wf`3 ' . ' W i r, ..I �i �r ` : k 4 w. 1 ` 1 % ; jy`�. 1 1. , � l Th - F n ,, a r is G 'f t _ i F ` S m Y. X. t f T S R I W 'TI d S )Y-5R' f) { `i 4 1 '+ .0 i '� + �, ■ f ,{ ck'.` • 1 ( { 1 I - Lr ! ` 13 1 u S 3 " 3; + •4i 1 'gth' i t 1 M R . f ✓ .) l Yl ' .0 1 M. 1Vt ', Ii ' ,{ f f l F I' '1 3: .et .et x F ii, ; @ r 0 i. � .S I ' +..; ( � ' f7 f 4:. c � af �i � f ' +I't ' A r t i I: '` 4l - tl y fl . c` di; r I rt 1 � t I t 1 ' A,S ti'' x ,, t, 14'k 7 9 ! x - * 1 ik tii LS�.'1. y 1{ P f�� ; " ( `1! I � `�'9 e , Ts I 1 '.Y' 8 M1} V 1 i r l 1 I I 1 �: i { l 1 .{•.! l t r +, ,. , } L Y P Ct-, t t d � x i h' r I rp a�x1 1 ivl P 1 t �a'.f s L"nRd`I IF �'IY --+ fA+ F rx4 I t k ,. 1(` + #ItiY a -_-.--r. l , ` A ' t % I $$ ! ' r $ 5" i x 1 1 u 1 hC n N ux l 11 R1 I7�y� �:' w -� ! 1 +.t r r y a P� :5 ..M1T. - ' w r�.�ro ears > 1 r rv1 �t r ✓ 9L' I ( 1 5 :I - • 11 y� > f1 T4 ; h Y 1'P L r' f a 't , v i+ y �T ' Y J > J /}t,.�t i Y , , {� . 1 ' a � 1 '+, a �kf ^ f ILtR�. YI Ydl <t F t 'I` ti W` `!`�:li I a ( ( 7 f i t l ` 7 s n '� . k rt' 4 � �1 k j r., trt y x. I Z � ,. ill el � ` t i! f l + �: II I f- T IY w � iIlT YrT .YP'4.[IT1 aJi >t��'] 1tt..+. F �{ 5 r 1 1- i ` ,` I IF a;i . P. t .. k , t M'"if: Srypp�r ,_ S.1:. Y [r7 5 I.« :. ' ' . S I c h±. h . l t I •ihd ..7,b+ n . a: . + .. F t •1 �f CQ �{ Y - 1 , � , } � In+� y f � 1 ( • . • f/ f ,, r a + I > { ! , I :' ' IcTF k ro-. " i '. ^ ^ ^VVV...::: iY+" � lT•. d J':ti j4 r N 1 i z` ry ` , ' t, * i "`S l 44�k 'F ' jyr �ir6 .. + rt a i� V, , t � � l � i A { 7# !'f '6. t it 1 r �.dVR« 1 1 ,. •a V *• � ei " .. ! 4°'r (ee`e ,. t $, '1 .4n k >%'� � , ! S I t q , • �.>Uir1 �r h ♦S 1 S. Pl1 /i Yi :A T 9 tlCi u af Y t 5 +5 1 •• MI , .. , wI' o 1l 4 F • I1. I 25 / /�I •••• • I — I • •••••..1 I '‘ 1 '1 _t! .1~; Tt[ S .ZO4 t \ 1 •';f•-• 7 tt, „. ; 1;7 • - 4 5? 1. � c� / s y ` 3 a • • •\ • ,' [47•.:7 t r ......-., , ,_-_.: 1 ,,± t .,r r p 1. I 1 i in -. /...; 1 -- — -- ---- to \i i I VI t • I h *' 1_ N t: r: _ •• cs.1 riNk141'' • \I ; 2:1 L I N 4 1± '';•. I rii \\I — 41 -7 ...i. : :th;iii -, ; --..-; . i - I • I= I • • • '1.• • 11 P Y i • FN. r rts: - - I - ='r x - ' ':i . . v vp b 11,4 - wit,FatSV I [Wir!q•klrcisk ••_ 17-3 r f ;CI -.e•4.c• • ,e- Lrftki •cci,?, NJ.; -- 1,11 • -- .4;;11,4 • �^ I, r . ` ` ( (, '< J ' I I R R, i • •I' i f � : I r _,... T . . - � � - " "!Y yj? . . 4- 5 ... „"... I– .—:- ■ - • . r f• ,..,,,,..:„. �q r . I q,ts� ■ _ egi I I ! • [ [ .! r1 ! S LEA -tic- .•••,.•.. c• t.;t2z,ist-k ±1 t5 v.--24 ;;? - :ti 7,c4 141:5,4L "4.41 . I I e • g •;I:.1•1 • I t "ft 11.4; 1 r..:; c •,47%, ■ L •-•••• Ned t- • •,-.• I a'..0‘.• [1.1D± MmCUCiag.iN /Inv. Cia min 01111. ;NSKE' &. ASSOCIATES, INC. South, 104 Freya Suite SPOKANE,. WASHINGTON .02 (509) 5272: SHEET 140 " :...:; CALCULATED BY 1 7ti! i• `.i • .' 11TB..r- _Y� / /�/S. \GL: 1V .. 1 C I E-i BY 1 - iTE' SCALE :.a74:':: l : . - 47 „,g! - awa i __ 1 _ I _ __, _ _ ' : - fi r ' _..: : i f ' 1� t Y T yIy'- 1 4 ' y . F //fl / /�/ L L a�' . 3 Z Z 7`5 A I ` I T ifi r r y • r- ! 1 'LJ i !� 1 1 1 : 6 1. ... ;11 1 1 Y.I f. , 1 r 1 � �t • 61 , ,n i r . 1 �w' I _ .; 1 _ f y J t 0 0 rr Z; I t�' { t t• . 1' > FJRI t , , t t - .r r tY t a� -i I I j// i 2 (� t P P k! P 1 J li - J ht' �jlr y'd ' i I T' � � j �1�V ' La i' t ' '• r r a t r I yr I , a 1 1 1.- - --TT $ 'h'IY I 'ry . . .t i L h 1 S S.. ! L 1 y r I • R ''. EI i iy U j ' ' 4 J t • "' .,!1, 1 NSKE & ASSOCIATES, IN South 104 Freya .Suite 203 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99202 (509) 534 -5272 , ;` JOB DATE SHEET ,p CALC - $ r • T BV CHECKED BV f . • - i : s fG �' - - �� . _ 4, d �/ �y_ ,�• I I 4 • 9 ,Z - ! O 3G I i Y C ^ OtZS ' Cd L • # 1 I I 1 BPD 2 %kr • 4 ' I I ( I ! I 4rt, ? I I T I 1 I • I .. ....... It lk`' ' \I� >S. C IF ,5j1 it ✓. i +..: TI -. ! 1 1 I I . .._ S l•Z 29 I I I ` i :K1 • ( fit P q1 yy� A+YY K I T�' I I I '" �^ I 1 ._. 1 = i 3 t Y s l C " de t E • a 1aRi .� - , „.. ,t 4t , 1 ' \. ! ! 44 I . i ... 1 ( - I 1 I I YY I t' = 10A _ L_ _ ` _ 0s1: �� `� 1 t .. F t , � (A ry ^ 1 ' l IA . git[ J r:w r i ,•1 .., � i 1' '�.# ♦! r I t `, k a--,I 1 ... 1 !' gg t• hag 1 . I !' I 1 - .. ,:. I ! �tJ 11 i - . I - " j Wt1 - 1 , I I 1 -� 1 - ` ' , • i '• : . I t v A F s• I 4 1 1 -- 1 _ _ +:i 2.C t? Li: a f, ■[ 5 i I � 1 1 '�` Y t , , wI °' l R I. I I i 1 11 y � ! 3 S r a - ,44t; . '..• t l .. .. ' i 111 � ; p ! I NSKE & ASSOCIATES, n . South 104 Freya Suite 203' SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99202 (509) 534-5272 JOB SHEET NO. r ` - ' , - CALCULATED 'BV - •' - - ^' ' -• DATE CHECKED BV' " """ " - DATE - _" SCALE i NSKE & ASSOCIA7 INC. South 104 Freya Suite 203 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99202 (509) 534.5272 ielefek kor JOB SHEET NO CALCULATED BY / DATE CHECKED B ; DATE SCALE' r� A I 1 ! I f � � r OF 2890 (.p7�_ e>9_Wc c!.= . 3 I 01 t > j i _ I I 1 � I d� j' 1 s i, 1 -i S ' �J '1;64 , 2 w. - - 9 r. /., aY N'. NSKE & ASSOCIATL ;NC. South 104 Freya Suite 203 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99202 (509) 534 -5272 SHEET NO ' OF CALCULATEDBY DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE ?l TALI /!�nn�r MC CMm. Mm 01471. NSKE & ASSOCIATE 'NC. South 104 Freya Suite _ .3 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99202 _ (509) 534 -5272 _22 r JOB SHEET NO OF CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY SCALE 1 NSKE & ASSOCIATES, Ih... South 104 Freya ' Suite 203 SPOKANE, WA O2 99202 1 i . . .....__ 1 i • JOB SHEET. NO CALCULATED BV I CHECKED, BV SCALE DATE - ,DATE _Ls ' A -�� • --- ...__ AZ SPOKANE COUNTY COURTHOUSE Lyle Balderson, Director Planning and Zoning City Hall Spokane, Wash. PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 7) April 6, 1988 REC&WED APR 06 1988 SPOKANE COUNTY ENI;INEEP Dear Lyle, This letter is in follow -up to a phone conversation of April 5th with Fred Dayharsh concerning the upcoming "Alcott" area annexation. Fred suggested that I write to you with the County's concern that you consider updating your Arterial Street Plan in conjunction with the annexation of this 160 acre area. The County's current Arterial Road Plan shows a future Minor Arterial road system through this area. During the County's initial review of George Thompson's preliminary plat of Wildwood Terrace (PE- 1473), both the S.E.P.A. checklist and a conceptual plan showing future development of the rest of Mr. Thompson's property addressed the need for this future arterial. The approved preliminary plat covers only a portion of Mr. Thompson's ownership. It was not deemed necessary to condition Phase I (the existing preliminary plat) for the arterial road, but it was pointed out in the staff report that the arterial will be needed as a mitigating measure for additional phases of his project. The County Engineer's office has determined that a road can be constructed through this area at a grade of 8% or less that will meet arterial road standards. This would improve upon the existing road system which now depends upon Carnahan Road as the primary north /sbuth route connecting Glenrose /Moran Prairie with the Valley. Letter to Lyle Balderson page 2 • 4/6/88 With the construction of the Moran Trunk Sewer, the City's enhanced ability to provide utilities to the Glenrose /Moran Prairie area will likely spur growth which will result in an added need to improve circulation. The anticipated growth will put more pressure on the City's residential streets such as 17th and 1 lth. The redirection of Carnahan traffic as shown on the County's Arterial Road Plan will provide for traffic relief in the City. We feel that it is in the best interest of both the City and County to 'provide for a future arterial system that will take pressure off of the local access /neighborhood streets and allow for smooth flow of traffic. This is why the County adopted the Arterial Road Plan and coordinated it with the City's Arterial Street Plan. I am including with this letter, a set of U.S.G.S. 7.5' Quads showing the County's adopted Arterial Road Plan and the Concept Plan for future development of Wildwood Terrace. Since upon annexation the preliminary plat would come under your control, it would be an opportunity for the City to continue acquiring the right -of -way for such a road. Sincerely, c John Mercer Spokane County Long Range Planning cc: Wally Hubbard John Nunnery Gary Nelson ✓ Fred Dayharsh OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON April 7, 1988 T0: SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ^^4r SUBJ: WILDWOOD TERRACE PE-1473 (Planning Report August 23, 1984) �� On April 6, 1938 Sharon Nord contacted this department. regarding the above referenced Staff Report document, This is the same document which was duplicated for 1he time extension request heard by the County Hearing Examiner Committee on 2-18-88. Ms. Nord has brought to our attention that the statement which appears in paragraph 3 Page 18 in incorrect. The statement reads as follows: "Havana Road is totally within the City Limits and is designated as a "residential street" similar to the County designation of ''Access Standard"." You should be advised that Havana Street adjacent to the proposed plat is a County Road and will remain as such until it is annexed into the City of Spokane" It is my understanding that there is a annexation proposal regarding this area going before the County Boundary Review Board in the near future. We will be sending a copy of this memorandum to Sharon Nord Jor her file. Thanks for your attention to this matte,. SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS & ORDER DATE: February 18, 1988 PE_79.7.3_8-4_ WILDWOOD TERRACE EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST ZE -88 -84 Agricultural to R -2 and MFS 1. The proposal is to extend the preliminary plat approval of Wildwood Terrace based upon the applicants steady progress in preparing the site for development. 2. Located between the County roads of 13th Avenue, Lloyd Road, 16th Avenue and Havana Road, all being approximately 1,500' feet West of Carnahan Road within Section 23, Township 25 North, Range 43 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. 3. I find that the item has been properly advertised in accordance with state and local regulations. 4. I have considered and evaluated the information and conditions contained in the Planning Report for this proposal. 5. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Urban and the proposal remains consistent with the density and use guidelines of this category. 6. I believe the proposal remains compatible with existing uses in the area which include: single family uses and open spaces. 7. 1 note that owners of adjacent and nearby property spoke generally against the proposal. Concerns of the public dealt with the safety of the pit, the compatibility of the proposed uses in the area and the potential for future annexations. 8. I find the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act have been complied with. 9. I additionally find that the lapse of preliminary plat approval was inadvertant in that the applicant did not receive notice that his plat was about to expire. 10. In excess of one million dollars has been spent according to the applicant to get the project to its current status. 1 1 . That a new preliminary plat submittal is not necessary to protect or enhance the public health, safety and welfare. 12. That no useful purpose would be served in requiring the applicant to resubmit the proposal. Findings for 2 -18 -88 Subdivision Hearing PE- 1473 -84 Page 2 DECISION AND ORJ)FR- To approve an extension of time for 3 years to January 1st, 1991. All previously established conditions of approval are to be complied with in the filing of the final plats of Wildwood Terrace. VOTE: 3 to 0 to APPROVE THE HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTESTS TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION AND VOTE. Chairperson ATT DATE: S. , T AMS Spokane C. my Subdivision Administrator SENSKE & ASSOCIATES INC. Civil Engineers /Land Sur rs S. 3009 Mt. Vernon Suite 101 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99203 -4775 (509) 534-5272 To Spokane County Engineers N. 811 Jefferson Spokane., Wa. Attn..- .Jerry _Sims , ._P.L. S. alOrauvao Date Subject 02/18/86 Wildwood LETTER .Please find attached two copies of the proposed final and the proposed dedication for Wildwood Terrace as revised -date. RECEIVED FELL 1.8.1986 County, Engineering ❑ Please reply ❑ No reply necessary SIGNED %M "1 Mr. George Thompson Thompson Enterprises South 3001 Mt. Vernon #6 Spokane, WA 99203 Dear Mr. Thompson: OFITI O COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER Sr®a2LA ,W tsian orox 99260 March 28, 1986 RE: RID 439, Wildwood Terrace You have requested that the stormwater retention pond proposed for con- struction under the proposed RID on 14th, 15th, Morrill and Lloyd be deleted and that drainage be directed to the existing drainage area as an interim measure with final disposition of the drainage being into a lower pond to be constructed in conjunction with future phases of your project; or, at least perhaps, only a small temporary retention pond be developed with the RID that could be eliminated with future development. This proposal seems feasible and would possibly result in construction savings; however, before the proposal can be implemented, you must arrange for the final overall plat drainage design so that the work proposed this year will be compatible. Please have your engineer consult with Gary Nelson of this office to coor- dinate this detailed design. Very truly yours, Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Verril/ Smale Engineering Administrator VS /set cc: Gary Nelson Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3600 DEDICATION Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1988 REVISED February 6, 198f REVISED April 25, 198f REVISED February 14, 1986 .RE %9 4- €187, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: that Wallace Construction, Inc.; and Selectors, Inc.; have caused to be platted into lots, and blocks, part of the plat of Woodland Terrace Addition as per plat thereof recorded in Volume I of Plats, Page 16 in Spokane County, Washington; being more particularly described as follows: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 8; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 9; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 10; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block 19; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block 20; together with the South half of vacated 13th. Avenue adjoining said Blocks 8, 9, and 10; together with vacated Morrill Road between said Blocks 8 and 9; together with Dearborn Road between said Blocks 9 and 10; together with Dearborn Road between said Lot 6, Block 19 and Lot 1, Block 20; together with the west half of Lloyd Road Adjoing said Block 10; together with the alley within said Blocks 8, 9, and 10; D 24 ( n) 1+6 E L..Arcr ‘ u n 6 'nest •de ° Page No. 1 Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 198 REVISED February 6, 1980 REVISED April 25, 198f REVISED February 14, 1986 all located in the Southwest quarter of Section 23, Township 25 North, Range 43 East of the Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. They do herby dedicate to public use forever the roads, drainage easements, and public utility easements shown within this plat. No direct access shall be allowed onto Havana Street from Lot 1, Block 1, however, a crash gate for fire protection is acceptable for Lot 1, Block 1 onto Havana Street if necessary. An individual driveway access permit, for the driveway approach to the County road system, is required prior to the issuance of a building permit for each lot. The owners, their heirs, grantees and assigns, agree to join in the formation of a County Road Improvement District pursuant to R.C.W. 36.88 at such time as a Road Improvement District is created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County. The improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving) will be at the sole expense of the owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. This statement refers to Havana Street. Page No. 2 Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1988 REVISED February 6, 1981 REVISED April 25, 198/ REVISED February 14, 1986 Note building set backsare required as shown hereon. No more than one structure may be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purpose of creating additional lots, ownerships, or building sites without first filing a replat. The use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. The public water system, pursuant to WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building & Safety Department, and water purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to the issuance of a building permit for each lot. A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on site sewage systems shall not be authorized. The Owner(s), or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to Page No. 3 Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1986' s REVISED February 6, 198VS REVISED April 25, 198g REVISED February 14, 1986 RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Sucessor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. No footings and foundations shall be constructed within Block 1 until a Certified Pit Rehabilitation Plan has been submitted to Spokane County Engineer and County The.r Planning Director for there review for completeness and proper certification by a qualified and Washington State licenced professional engineer and as conditioned with approval of PE- 1473 -84. The properties shown heron are subject to reservations, easements and restrictions of record: Page No. 4 Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 19810 REVISED February 6, 19805 REVISED April 25, 1986 REVISED February 14, 1986 Subject to Declaration of Covenants filed the day of , 1986; as Auditor's Document No. providing for the operation and maintenance of the "Pit Safety Fence "; among other items; and by reference is made a part hereof. In witness whereof, the aforesaid individuals hereby affix their signatures. Wallace Construction, Inc. Wallace Construction, Inc. Selectors, Inc. Selectors, Inc. ACKNOWLEGEMENT: State of Washington ) )ss. On this day of , 1986, before me personally appeared , and known to me to be the and the of Wallace Construction, Inc., the Washington Corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the corporate seal attached (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF; I have hereunto set my hand and Page No. 5 Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1988 REVISED February 6, 1986 REVISED April 25, 1986 REVISED February 14, 1986 affixed my seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at ACKNOWLEGEMENT: State of Washington ss, On this day of , 1986, before me personally appeared , and known to me to be the and the of Selectors, Inc. the Washington corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the corporate seal attached (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER: Examined and approved this day of , 1986. Spokane County Engineer SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT: Examined and approved this day of , 1986. Director, County Utilities SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT: Examined and approved this day of , 1986. County Planning Dept. Director SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER: I do hereby certify that all taxes which have been levied and become chargeable against the land shown within this plat have been fully paid on this day of , 1986 Page No. 6 Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR: Examined and approved this January 24, 1986 REVISED February 6, 1988 REVISED April 25, 1986' REVISED February 14, 1986 Spokane County Treasurer Page No. 7 day of , 1986. Spokane County Assessor SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT: Examined and approved this day of , 1986. Spokane County Health Officer SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: This plat was examined and approved by the Commissioners of Spokane County on this day of , 1986. Chairman, County Commissioners SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the Spokane County Platting Ordinance. J.Ronald Dunsmore, L.S. # 16198 DEDICATION Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 RECEIVED January 24, 1985 APR 291985 REVISED February 6, 1985 Dimly Engineering REVISED April 25, 1985 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: that Wallace Construction, Inc.; and Selectors, Inc.; have caused to be platted into lots, and blocks, part of the plat of Woodland Terrace Addition as per plat thereof recorded in Volume I of Plats, Page 16 in Spokane County, Washington; being more particularly described as follows: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 8; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 9; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 10; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block 19; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block 20; together with the South half of vacated 13th. Avenue adjoining said Blocks 8, 9, and 10; together with vacated Morrill Road between said Blocks 8 and 9; together with Dearborn Road between said Blocks 9 and 10; together with Dearborn Road between said Lot 6, Block 19 and Lot 1, Block 20; together with the west half of Lloyd Road Adjoing said Block 10; together with the alley within said Blocks 8, 9, and 10; .Dra .1e r e 4 ,5 ^^mac 4.,s c( ale." en. %n Y�c .^a. ;w p lw,. Page No. 1 Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1985 REVISED February 6, 1985 REVISED April 25, 1985 all located in the Southwest quarter of Section 23, Township 25 North, Range 43 East of the Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. They do herby dedicate to public use forever the roads, drainage easements, and public utility easements shown within this plat. No direct access shall be allowed onto Havana Street from Lot 1, Block 1, however, a crash gate for fire protection is acceptable for Lot 1, Block 1 onto Havana Street if necessary. An individual driveway access permit, for the driveway approach to the County road system, is required prior to the issuance of a building permit for each lot. The owners, their heirs, grantees and assigns, agree to join in the formation of a County Road Improvement District pursuant to R.C.W. 36.88 at such time as a Road Improvement District is created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County. The improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving) will be at the sole expense of the owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. This statement refers to Havana Street. Page No. 2 Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1985 REVISED February 6, 1985 REVISED April 25, 1985 Note building set back are required as shown hereon. No more than one structure may be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purpose of creating additional lots, ownerships, or buildinwOsites without first filing a replat. The use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. The public water system, pursuant to WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building & Safety Department, and water purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to the issuance of a building permit for each lot. A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on site sewage systems shall not be authorized. The Owner(s), or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property Page No. 3 Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1985 REVISED February 6, 1985 REVISED April 25, 1985 and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Sucessor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. No footings and foundations shall be constructed within Block 1 until a Certified Pit Rehabilitation Plan has been submitted to Spokane County Engineer and County Planning Director for there review for completeness and proper certification by a qualified and Washington State licenced professional engineer and as conditioned with approval of PE- 1473 -84. The properties shown heron are subject to reservations, easements and restrictions of record: Page No. 4 Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1985 REVISED February 6, 1985 REVISED April 25, 1985 Subiect to Declaration of Covenants filed the day of , 1985; as Auditor's Document No. providing for the operation and maintenance of the "Pit Safety Fence "; among other items; and by reference is made a part hereof. In witness whereof, the aforesaid individuals hereby affix their signatures this day of , 1985. Wallace Construction, Inc. Wallace Construction, Inc. Selectors, Inc. Selectors, Inc. ACKNOWLEGEMENT: On this day of personally appeared , and known to me to be the and the of Wallace Construction, Inc., the Washington Corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the corporate seal attached (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing Page No. 5 State of Washington ) )ss. , 1985, before me 1 at SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER: Examined and approved this Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1985 REVISED February 6, 1985 REVISED April 25, 1985 ACKNOWLEGEMENT: State of Washington ss, On this day of , 1985, before me personally appeared , and known to me to be the and the of Selectors, Inc. the Washington corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the corporate seal attached (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at day of , 1985. Spokane County Engineer SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT: Examined and approved this day of , 1985. Director, County Utilities SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT: Examined and approved this day of , 1985. County Planning Dept. Director SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER: I do hereby certify that all taxes which have been levied and become chargeable against the land shown within this plat have been fully paid on this day of , 1985 SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR: Spokane County Treasurer Page No. 6 Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 Examined and approved this January 24, 1985 REVISED February 6, 1985 REVISED April 25, 1985 SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT: Examined and approved this day of , 1985. Spokane County Assessor day of , 1985. Spokane County Health Officer SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: This plat was examined and approved by the Commissioners of Spokane County'on this day of , 1985. Chairman, County Commissioners SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the Spokane County Platting Ordinance. J.Ronald Dunsmore, L.S. # 16198 Page No. 7 DEDICATION Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1985 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: that ; have caused to be platted into lots, and blocks, part of the plat of Woodland Terrace Addition as per plat thereof recorded in Book I at page 16 in Spokane County, Washington; and being more particularly described as follows: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 8; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 9; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 10; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block 19; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block 20; together with the south half of vacated 13th. Avenue adjoining said Blocks 8, 9, and 10; together with vacated Morrill Road between said Blocks 8 and 9; together with Road between said Blocks 9 and 10; U 4.44437 together with Road between said Lot 6, Block 19 o sTBD and Lot 1, Block 20; together with the west half of ActriED •Road Adjoing said Block 10; together with the Palley within said Blocks 8, 9, and 10; all located in the Southwest quarter of Section 23, Township 25 North, Range 43 East of the Willamette RECEIVED Page No.1 JAN 25 1985 County Ebal lee n Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1985 Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. They do herby dedicate to public use forever the roads, drainage easements, and public utility easements shown within this plat. No direct access shall be allowed onto Havana Street from Lot 1, Block 1, however, a crash gate for fire protection is acceptable for Lot 1, Block 1 onto Havana Street if necessary. An individual driveway access permit, for the driveway approach to the County road system, is required prior to the issuance of a building permit for each lot. No more than one structure may be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purpose of creating additional lots, ownerships, or building sites without first filing a replat. The use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. The public water system, pursuant to WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building & Safety Department, and water purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to the issuance of a building permit for each lot. A public sewer system will be made available for the Page No.2 Proposed Dedication ' WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1985 plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on site sewage systems shall not be authorized. The Owner(s), or Successor(s) in interest agree to autrhorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Sucessor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. The properties shown heron are subject to reservations, easements and restrictions of record as per: Subject to Declaration of Covenants filed the day of , 1985; as Auditor's Document No. providing for the operation and maintenance of the "Pit Page No.3 Safety Fence "; among other items; and by reference is made a part hereof. Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1985 In witness whereof, the aforesaid individuals hereby affix their signatures this day of , 1985. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: State of Washington )ss. On this __ day of , 1985, personally appeared before me, , husband and wife, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as thier free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the day and year last above written. Notary public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at ACKNOWLEGEMENT: State of Washington ) )ss. On this day of , 1985, before me personally appeared , and known to me to be the and the of the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the corporate seal attached (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the day and year last above written. Page No.4 ACKNOWLEGEMENT: ss, On this day of personally appeared Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1985 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at State of Washington , 1985, before me , and known to me to be the and the of the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the corporate seal attached (if any) is "the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at ACKNOWLEGEMENT: ss, On this day of personally appeared and the State of Washington , 1985, before me , and known to me to be the of Corporation, the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the corporate seal attached (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER: Examined and approved this day of , 1985. Spokane County Engineer Page No.5 Ptoposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1985 SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT: Examined and approved this day of Director, County Utilities SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT: Examined and approved this day of SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR: Examined and approved this SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT: Examined and approved this Spokane County Treasurer Spokane County Assessor Page No.6 , 1985. , 1985. County Planning Dept. Director SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER: I do hereby certify that all taxes which have been levied and become chargeable against the land shown within this plat have been fully paid on this day of , 1985 day of , 1985. day of , 1985. Spokane County Health Officer SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: This plat was examined and approved by the Commissioners of Spokane County on this day of , 1985. Chairman, County Commissioners SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the Spokane County Platting Ordinance. J.Ronald Dunsmore, L.S. # 16198 k• _ • " 4 .1,• , • .:4 i A - • • r - 1 :,••••• • • • • , • • • , • • • - • . . , . • ..• .... . . •' • • . - • . 'a: t rtt . . , • . RN/C VLTZ ka l°9$ N n v BK6013 BALANCE DOE A • c ions L•Haumisim'AAIHAAs 7. Do .!ges ava Ni 0 AM.7 FAO CniCK RECEIPT Date Received From 7- bcct7 , 50/1-) Es.7"; (a_i. 9 4 a-_.:_ 4,2is Address &A, Dollars $ For E O te at Cc Fe: Lo lc{ ,.. (7 C/Sh ACCOLINI HOW PAID A.ml OF „cc:um m..)•.11 01•C•11 '14..DMIL.I• ti..issmai tf.flidati...1.,• sare....itfluatfl11100/0/Ralalfartaiiinaial 8 Int l! E Pug! 00:01E 0001 52 1:i 1 2 00.0 •E li 7-211.76.49 IILICEtilarrirlattlt=1C111)0=ifinntOIDCatalat suoaczackicaroglinnissionnO2101MEIMIlizacinomterilLaOCSCIAM31,111.11411101allaDIIt ••• ••••• •;‘'' • 31 19 cy, --- sPorf,N117 . . By sill` Cie P0Z66 NOIDNIHSVM '3NVNOdS 6191-S1S (60s) 3AINCI I-101H HIS 1SV1 'DNI - OD NOIOCIHISNOD 3.3VI1vM 'DNI i SiSINda31N3 NOSdtN0H.1. • iv 7337 S 3 DO 3 /4 4 &4 7 - 2/" 46 7 01 5 . acp e l A 4 -- A V d 01 DEDICATION Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD- TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1985 • REVISED February 6, 1985 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: that Wallace Construction, Inc.; and Selectors, Inc.; have caused to be platted into lots, and blocks, part of the plat of Woodland Terrace Addition as per plat thereof recorded in Volume I of Plats, Page 16 in Spokane County, Washington; being more particularly described as follows: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 8; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 9; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 10; Lots 1, 2,'3, 4, 5, and 6, Block 19; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block 20; together with the South half of vacated 13th. Avenue adjoining said Blocks 8, 9, and 10; together with vacated Morrill Road between said Blocks 8 and 9; together with Dearborn Road between said Blocks 9 and 10; together with Dearborn Road between said Lot 6, Block 19 and Lot 1, Block 20; together with the west half of Lloyd Road Adjoing said Block 10; together with the alley within said Blocks 8, 9, and - 10; • That the Final Plat shall include: No footings & found- ation shall be constructed within Block 1 until a Certified Rehabilitation Plan has been submitted to Spokane County Engineer and County Planning Director for there review__ for_compieteness and proper certification by a qualified and Wash .State licenced professional engineer and as conditioned with .approval of PE- 1473-84." ,'� Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD -TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1985 REVISED February 6, 1985 all located in the Southwest quarter of Section 23, Township 25 North, Range 43 East of the Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. They do herby dedicate to public use forever the roads, drainage easements, and public utility easements shown within this plat. No direct access shall be allowed onto Havana Street from Lot 1, Block 1, however, a crash gate for fire protection is acceptable for Lot 1, Block 1 onto Havana Street if necessary. An individual driveway access permit, for the driveway approach to the County road system, is required prior to the issuance of a building permit for each lot. No more than one structure may be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purpose of creating additional lots, ownerships, or building sites without first filing a replat. The use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. The public water system, pursuant to WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building & Safety Department, and water purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic Page No. 2 Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD -TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1985 REVISED February 6, 1985 water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to the issuance of a building permit for each lot. A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on site sewage systems shall not be authorized. The Owner(s), or Successor(s) in interest agree to autrhorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Sucessor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. The properties shown heron are subject to reservations, easements and restrictions of record as per: Page No. 3 Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD -TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1985 REVISED February 6, 1985 Subject to Declaration of Covenants filed the day of , 1985; as Auditor's Document No. providing for the operation and maintenance of the "Pit Safety Fence "; among other items; and by reference is made a part hereof. In witness whereof, the aforesaid individuals hereby affix their signatures this day of , 1985. Wallace Construction, Inc. Wallace Construction, Inc. Selectors, Inc. Selectors, Inc. ACKNOWLEGEMENT: State of Washington ) )ss. On this day of , 1985, before me personally appeared , and known to me to be the and the of Wallace Construction, Inc., the Washington Corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the corporate seal attached (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the day and year last above written. Page No. 4 January 24, 1985 REVISED February 6, 1985 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at ACKNOWLEGEMENT: State of Washington ss, On this day of , 1985, before me personally appeared , and known to me to be the and the of Selectors, Inc. the Washington corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the corporate seal attached (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER: Examined and approved this SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT: Examined and approved this day of SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT: Examined and approved this day of SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER: I do hereby certify that all taxes which have been levied and become chargeable against the land shown within this plat have been fully paid on this day of , 1985 SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR: Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD TERRACE PE 1473 - 84 day of , 1985. Spokane County Engineer Director, County Utilities County Planning Dept. Director Spokane County Treasurer Page No. 5 , 1985. , 1985. Examined and approved this Proposed Dedication WILDWOOD-TERRACE PE 1473 -84 January 24, 1985 REVISED February 6, 1985 day of , 1985. Spokane County Assessor SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT: Examined and approved this day of , 1985. Spokane County Health Officer SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: This plat was examined and approved by the Commissioners of Spokane County on this day of , 1985. Chairman, County Commissioners SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the Spokane County Platting Ordinance. J.Ronald Dunsmore, L.S. # 16198 Page No. 6 5P0%ANt COUNTY COURT HOUSE October 27, 1987 Carolyn Ruth Pickett East 4322 12th Avenue Spokane, WA 99212 RE: Your Letter of October 12, 1987 Dear Mrs. Pickett: RECEIVE OCT e 1987 S POKANE Coro �� . __ tomr, $!T<IOn. .' J :D�o � :• PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 I have investigated the file and the site in reference to the Wildwood Terrace Subdivision, sponsor George Thompson, which is listed as PE- 1473 -84, a preliminary plat in our files. Your letter referenced above makes several statements and asks a number of questions, which I will try to answer in the order asked. Firstly, I must reiterate that the sponsor is still in compliance with the requirements of a preliminary plat. 1 have talked with Walt Rupple of the Department of Natural Resources and he stated that DNR released the pit as an active mining operation in the early 1970s, and as long as there is no material sold off the site they have no responsibility or authority in the matter. Secondly, I can find no prohibition in the conditions of the plat which prevent use of the material on the site for fill. In the matter of blasting permits, this Department has no responsibility for issuance. The Department of Building and Safety issues those permits through a separate process, although I am sure they must meet the criteria for testing and safety. Prior to any building permit issuance, the sponsor must file a final plat which resolves the conditions placed on the proposal and relates directly to the five questions listed in your letter. 1. The roadwork, drainage and access requirements are tied to a Road Improvement District administered by the County Engineers. At the conclusion of the final plat and prior to building permits, the sponsor will have to comply with the County Engineer's requirements. Temporary access points appear to be necessary to accomplish the grading plan. Carolyn Ruth Pickett October 27, 1987 Page Two 5. Equipment used at the site during times of our inspection was all located on the sponsor's property. Again, I must state that our investigation finds that the sponsor is progressing through the steps necessary to file a final plat and secure building permits for Wildwood Terrace. Sincerely, 2. The road elevations will be as decided by the County Engineers. 3. Site inspections and a review of the grading plan elevations appear to meet the height limitations as stated in the required plat conditions. Building permit review will insure the actual height and siting of the building locations. 4. The reclamation or rehabilitation plan is in the preliminary plat file. The safety fencing and final grades illustrated appear to meet the plat conditions. Wallis D. Hubbard Planning Director WDH:fcu:0063A cc:F. Keith Shepard, Chairman, Spokane County Commissioners :Jeff Forry, Spokane County Building and Safety Department :Gary Nelson, Spokane County Engineering Department,/ TO: Gary Nelson Spokane County Engineers FROM: Wallis D. Hubbard c2 /7.. - Planning Director DATE: October 29, 1987 SUBJECT: George Thompson's Rehabilitation Plan: Wildwood Terrace WDH:ks BROADWAY CENTRE BUILOtNG N 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 I have received a rehabilitation plan on the above - referenced project. and I believe you have seen one before. The conditions of the plat require that the County Engineers and the Planning Director sign off on this rehabilitation plan. As you will notice in my letter of October 27 to Mrs. Pickett, I have contacted the Department of Natural Resources, and they stated that they have no respon- sibility for approving the plan. it seems appropriate that the County Engineers request DNR to assist us in reviewing the rehabilitation plan so that we can both sign it off in preparation for a final plat process. The rehabilitation plan is dated February of 1986, by Adams and Clark Engineers. If you don't have a copy, either George Thompson or Adams and Clark have them, or we can loan you the copy in our file. Please let me know. Thanks. 11/3/87 Wally I requested Adams and Clark to obtain review comments from the DNR, specifically, Kathy Hoglen was to obtain the review. It is my understanding that DNR has not responded to Adams and Clark. I first requested that Kathy check with DNR last year, and I did so again last week when you first called about the rehabilition plan. I called Kathey today and she will follow up to see where they are regarding DNR. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROJ WILDWOOD TERRACE NAME DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Drywell - Type A 2) Drywell - Type B 3) Grate - Type 1 4) Grate - Type 2 5) Grate - Type 3 6) Backfill For DW 7) Concrete Inlet 8) C.M. pipe 10" dia. 9) C.M. pipe 12" dia. 10) C.M. pi'pe 15" dia. 11) C.M. pipe 18" dia. 12) Precast Manhole 13) Solid Lid 14) Ditch Excavation 15) Sod 1) LIGHT LOOSE RIP RAP CY 2) WSDOT GRATE INLET #2 EA 3) 4) 5) 6) 19> Rough Grade 21) Top Course 20) Base Course 22) Asphalt Concrete 23) Curb Type A 24) Curb Type B 25) Curb Type R 26) Sidewalk NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS UNITS EA. EA" EA. EA" EA, CY EA" LF LF LF LF EA. EA. CY NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, & SIDEWALK CY CY CY Tons LF LF LF SQ YD QUANTITY 4 '4 4 l 280 101 536 LSI S4 1769 16) Monuments EA. 17) Barricade LF 18) Street Signs EA. 1) EMBANKMENT COMPACTION CY 1000 2) CEM CONC DRIVEWAY SY 96 3) 4) lER DIVA ID Tr Plitc.); MEE JS DATE 4/14/87 PRICE 1175.00 1435.00 3o0"00 320"00 310.00 9.00 52()"O0 12.00 16.50 18^00 21"00 1435.00 300.00 7^90 COST 4700.00 5740.00 1200.00 0.00 124u.00 2520.00 O"00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2121.00 0"00 0.00 4234,40 - ''-------~ - 2 40.00 80.00 4 600^00 2400.()0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL s..7.-act5p 2 140.00 280.00 50 20.00 1000.00 2 75.00 150.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL 143()^00 1725 7^90 13627.50 2933 10,60 31089,80 10"60 0.00 1005 37.60 37788"00 4.25 0.00 4585 5.20 23842.00 5.20 0^00 684 13.00 8892^()0 0.50 13^O0 500.00 1248.00 0.00 0.00 'GRADING AND SURFACING SURFACING 116987^30 GRAND TOTAL 20 s�� ~1, ��r4^ ^ � arearmatram �� i ��. MIN PG - 1 1 -} 7 3 - 2 Lf 02 - �t R t tGN -kI t . Gee(L Thornps aaj - a 5 1 S' b S taty e. .7z c_3 i�. Discus •>ucl P tzo . c �. r c s 5 uN _ p.r_o.i.e.crT rk. w_J `tu ne. e4V�.,ts; ern_ -stratt==stat _K,ns mts -s e a. f�.�,,,n - e R orrd,a..; a4w5.-�l r-au $tct4.1 C - at 4 !, o 0 0, o o ov1 pt c es.s t _cad % . 1tPPost # /ei 1 - t. 1 5.€-C-011z ct — W o- F.Q.. s lint s Tr -Prone Cwse{/Z ..�_W In ?.twc.SL are — Wyla aJ tz.H.c w ft ut At t7 ufe -eel - y 3_z.z._ anerer �y - A. t9'1%- Swb1 ?rot). d in AS A e u.bItc Nuns 0. Not l'h >sen h R% 0-42-A 4 A ivLtes C • U 1 / 444 C- OVAAI Inc e.«l rt Li cv\ s 1 s o . 5 Q a t n wa-ta l...o_c i c _ain_ u loi_Vn er _Acctz.oss_.t =r_om_ Vi en- In o w4 O • 131P.STtn t, -arotc.e Wta'Cbrt.. M tat i1/4..) ak hours. tein (La.e.A • F k L3 %ttr»vft no Fulled +0 &e Ytnmt-t Nhit all q_. P c "C 3 Cs. O b,t r tit °tea C ct- vCr _-d Z - I s'-8' etweni..: t_Can s rrr i chi' _c t.4..ckt.wta 6n -at S _RT_To+ raj— eoch s- T- i_r.c.egeS_q-_04..4.ri+t- 0 C - ?tkU Lk- teat nys Lew5 • RECEIVED JUL 307986 COUOtyfng urin$ West 521 First Avenue KO72 /mca TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY P. 0. Box 2122 - Spokane, WA 99204 -0366 Spokane, WA 99210 -2122 To: J. Ronald Dunsmore Senske & Associates, Inc. S. 3009 Mt. Vernon Spokane, WA Your Loan No.: Wildwood Terrace Our Order No.: C- 168446, Unit 2._ Mortgagor /Purchaser: Thompson THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT CC: County Planning CC: County Engineer There has been no change in the title to the property covered by our preliminary report since February 20, 1986, at 8 A.M. Except as set forth below: 1. The County Treasurer's records reveal a preliminary assessment for Road Improvement District No. 439, in the sum of $(no amount given), which may result in a lien against said premises at a future date. Said preliminary assessment is not a lien as between buyer and seller and this notice is given for informa- tional purposes only. Reference to the office of the County Treasurer is made for further information. 2. Delinquent general and weed taxes for 1986 plus interest and fees. Parcel No. Code General Weed Affects 23533 -0801 043 $196.49 $1.00 Lots 1 to 12, Block 8 23533 -0901 043 $192.53 $1.00 Lots 1 to 12, Block . 9 23533 -1001 043 $176.71 $1.00 Lots 1 to 12, Block i.: 23533 -1901 043 $160.88 $1.00 Lots 1 to 12, Block 1"' 23533 -2001 043 $76.48 $1.00 Lots 1 to 6, Block 20 Dated as of the llth day of July, 1986, 8:00 A.M. TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Washington State Division B COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 June 6 Mine Site Rehabilitation Plans F!LE — Vin-43 \A, 00 TERt ic. ° "" June 6, 1986 JOe "86 -027 ATTENTION Gary Nelson nE, Mine Site Rehabilitation Plan for ueorge V. Thompson TO ADAMS & CLARK, INC. W. 1803 Maxwell SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 Phone 328.5853 Spokano County Enginoora Dopartmont Public Works Building Spokane, Washington 99260 WE ARE SENDING YOU E Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter or comments plaase PROM, 242 fA s)ac. Cam Mn BNn. (• /Pt CUR CO An_ e", s '`ow,. A Prints ❑ Change order 19 ❑ Plans COPY TO If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. OF 01 Ymfr revs ew print ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: Ct For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution a As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS n I - Natural ttesotirces has been con aaccteed by our oii ce and ise ha sant. copies of this Rah ahili tation Plan with the nhan•es yon recommended along with appropriate applications and fees. When they have :1 _".e .� a ey 1.71 ee con :c ng you, you ave any ques ons enntact cur nffl ca, The cnntact Rubble in Spokane, and Terry Cogswell in Colville. parcnns at DNB are Walt ti rr� the following items: SIGNED: _t ,� U// Use to document all meetings with external parties dealing with County position on proposals. Meetings With: Represented By: {/J, County Attendees: Was There Concurrence? /, J 509/6 MEETING RECORD Date: 4 - 13 - File No.: S /17 3 Specific Topic(s)c Proposals Presented: csrt County Position Stated: &04 —J 4.0 /� l 4 Distribution: 1) Project File a 2) Division Head 1--I 3) Co. Engineer a 4) Attendees Use back or additional sheets for detail of meeting if necessary. Contract Estimate Page- 1 Designer- DOLAN Date- 04/15/87 li Project Description- 14TH.,15TH.,LLOYD Project No.- 439 p ; i, I i, Item No, Description Units Price Quantity M sount i (( s 1 310 ROADWAY EXCAVATION INCLUDING HAUL C.Y. 5.00 1725 8,625.00 2 470 EMBANIQIENT COMPACTION C.Y. .50 1000 500.00 r"t 3 1035 DETENTICN POND EXCAVATION INCLUDING HAUL C.Y. 5.00 536 2,680.00 i 4 1041 PRECAST DRYWELL TYPE A EACH 800.00 4 3,200.00 f, 5 1042 PRECAST DRYWELL TYPE B EACH 1,000.00 4 4,000.00 i, 6 1051 METAL FRAME AND, GRATE TYPE 1 EACH 250.00 4 1,000.00 7 1054 METAL FRAME AND GRATE TYPE 3 (SLOTTED) EACH 250.00 4 1,000.00 - B 1074 LIGHT LOOSE RIPRAP C.Y. 20.00 2 40.00 9 1313 PLAIN STEEL CULVERT PIPE 0.064 IN THICK 18 IN DINT L.F. 18.00 151 2,718.00 Y 10 5120 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE TON 9.00 2953 26,577.00 11 5765 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CL 8 INCL PAVING ASPHALT TEN 31.00 1095 33,945.00 l°. 12 6555 SOD INSTALLATION S.Y. 4.50 1769 7,960.50 13 6704 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB TYPE B L.F. 4.75 4585 21,778.75 s 14 6751 BENZ GUARD RAIL TYPE 1 L.F. 30.00 50 1,500.00 15 7015 SPECIAL BACKFILL FOR DRYWELLS C.Y. 8.00 280 2,240.00 I' 16 7055 CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK S.Y. 12.50 684 8,550.00 .. 17 7062. CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY - RESIDENTIAL S.Y. 13.00 96 1,248.00 18 7806 W.S.D.O.T. GRATE INLET TYPE '2' EA. 450.00 4 1,800.00 i_ i = Contract Total Construction Engineering 0.00% Contingencies 0.00% $ 129,362.25 Project Total $ 129,362.25 0.00 0.00 x047 /ss Senske and Associates, Inc. Attn: J. Ronald Dunsmore S. 3009 Mt. Vernon Spokane, WA TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY West 521 First Avenue Spokane, Washington 99210 Telephone: (509) 838 -5281 REPORT FOR PLAT CERTIFICATE Refer to: C- 168446, Unit 2 RE: Thompson RECEryE FE 6 1985 Couu[y Engineering CC: Planning Commission CC: County Engineer This is a report for plat certificate as of January 24,1985 at 8:00 a.m., covering the following property: Proposed Plat of Wildwood Terrace, described as follows: That part of the plat of Woodland Terrace Addition, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "I" of Plats, Page 16, in Spokane County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, Block 8; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, Block 9; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, Block 10; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, Block 19; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, Block 20; together with the South half of vacated 13th Avenue adjoining said Blocks 8, 9 and 10; together with vacated Morrill Road between said Blocks 8 and 9; together with Dearborn Road between said Blocks 9 and 10; together with Dearborn Road between said Lot 6, Block 19 and Lot 1, Block 20; together with the West half of Lloyd Road adjoining said Block 10; together with the alley within said Blocks 8, 9 and 10. Record title is vested in Wallace Construction, Inc., a Washington Corporation. 168446, Unit 2 /Plat Certificate SUBJECT TO: - 2 - 1. Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness of the amount herein stated. Amount : $330,000.00 Dated : November 30, 1984 Recorded : December 3, 1984 Auditor's No. : 8412030004 Grantor : George V. Thompson and Teresa D. Thompson, husband and wife; and Wallace Construction Inc., a Washington Corporation Trustee : Ticor Title Insurance Company, a corporation Beneficiary : Selectors Inc., a Washington corporation Affects : Said premises and other property 2. Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness of the amount herein stated. Amount : $60,000.00 Dated : December 19, 1984 Recorded : December 20, 1984 Auditor's No. : 84122000034 Grantor : George V. Thompson and Teresa D. Thompson, husband and wife; and Wallace Construction Inc., a Washington corporation Trustee : Transamerica Title Insurance Company, a corporation Beneficiary : Selectors Inc., a Washington corporation Affects : Said premises and other property This report shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the certificate applied for. No charge KO47 /ss TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Spokane County Office Authorized/Signat0ry To: J. Ronald Dunsmare Senske & Associates S. 3009 Mt. Vernon Spokane, WA Regarding: Wildwood Terrace pE 1413 Our Order No.: C- 168446 U -2 Mortgagor /Purchaser: Thompson/ There has been no change in the title to the property covered by our preliminary report since July 22, 1985, at 8 A.M. Except as set forth below: 1. The legal description is amended to be: The proposed Plat of Wildwood Terrace Addition, described as follows: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, Block 8; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, Block 9; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, Block 10; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, Block 19; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, Block 20; MISC12 /jb RECfj tro FEB ' S 1986 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY pp,,��,,,,� West 521 First Avenue P. 0. Box 2122 :"°"V. ffgjQBBtj Spokane, WA 99204 -0366 Spokane, WA 99210 -2122 SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT cc: County Planning County Engineer Together with the South half of vacated 13th Avenue adjoining said Blocks 8, 9 and 10; together with vacated Morrill Road between said Blocks 8 and 9; together with Dearborn Road between said Blocks 9 and 10; together with Dearborn Road between said Lot 6, Block 19 and Lot 1, Block 20; together with the West half of Lloyd Road adjoining said Block 10; together with the alley within said Blocks 8, 9 and 10; All located in the Southwest quarter of Section 23, Township 25 North, Range 43 East, W.M., in Spokane County,,Washington. RECEIVED FEB. 2 5 1986 \ COUNTY ENGINEER/ C- 168446 U -2 - 2 - Second Supplemental 2. General and weed taxes for 1986, in the respective sums of $196.49 and $1.00; $192.53 and $1.00; $176.71 and $1.00; $160.88 and $1.00; and $76.48 and $1.00. (Respective Assessor's Parcel Nos. 23533 -0801; -0901; -1001; -1901 and -2001, Code 043) 3. A Claim of Lien for Labor and /or Material By : Senske & Associates Inc. Amount Claimed : $14,197.92 + interest and costs Against : George Thompson, d /b /a Thompson Enterprises Inc. Commencement Date: May 15, 1984 Cessation Date : July 11, 1985 Recorded : August 21, 1985 Auditor's No. : 8508210146 4. Guaranty Agreement Dated : July 26, 1985 Recorded : August 6, 1985 Auditor's No. : 8508060260 By : Wallace Construction, a Washington Corporation, and George V. Thompson and Teresa D. Thompson, as individuals To : Selectors Inc. Dated as of the 20th day of February, 1986, 8 A.M. MISC12 /jb TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Washington State Division SPOKANE COUNTY COURT ROUSE Mr. George Thompson Wallace Construction, Inc. East 518 Highdrive Spokane, WA 99203 Dear Mr. Thompson: gmn cc: Jim Haines Verril Smale r.vr, t:L' (.F COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER 4rijiizt.>r: 000u nutAtiruv 99260 January 28, 1986 Subject: Wildwood Terrace PE 1473 We have reviewed the file for your plat, together with the latest submittal of your road and drainage plans. It is our understanding that you desire to satisfy the street construction conditions for this plat by a Road Improvement District (RID). Accordingly, we have begun the process to create the RID. We also understand that you do not intend to file the plat until the RID is created by the Board of County Commissioners. The RID will include the design of the road and drainage for all of the streets in this phase of your plat, as well as other streets for which your Engineer has not submitted plans. Additionally, the drilling we undertook at your request shows that drywelis will not work in this area. Therefore, an overall storm sewer and street design will be necessary for the RID, and we have suspended any further review of the road and drainage plans you submitted. We are now investigating the drainage alternatives in order to revise the project cost estimate. The file also indicates that you can file your plat prior to our approval of your pit rehabilitation plan; however, no footings and foundations shall be approved until the pit rehabilitation plan is approved. I believe this answers the questions you raised, and documents our January 14, 1986 telephone conversation. If not, please feel free to contact us. Very truly yours, Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer . Nelson, P.E. Planning Engineer Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane. Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3600 NO. 8q(4osr BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY ) SUBDIVISION PE- 1473 -84, WILDWOOD ) FINDINGS OF FACT, TERRACE AND ZUNE RECLASSIFICATION ) CONCLUSION AND DECISION ZE- 88 -84, FROM AGRICULTURAL TO R -2 8 MFS) SPONSOR: WALLACE CONSTRUCTION CO. THIS MATTER, being considered by the Board of Spokane County, hereinafter referred to as the "Board Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee decision of said committee APPROVED said proposal with conditions RECEUVEO JAN 14 1986 W. maw& County Commissioners of ", of an appeal of the October 2, 1984, where of approval. The Board received two appeal applications on October 3 1984 by John O'Brien and October 5, 1984 by Rile L. Pickett. The Board held a de novo public hearing on November 16, 1984, and having fully considered all testimony presented, and having individually acquainted themselves with the vicinity and the site in question, didreach a decision on December 4 1984, to DENY the appeal after considering or concluding the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Tnat the proposal is 14.5 acres of 116 acre site optioned by the sponsor. 2. That the Hearing Examiner Committee had requested additional information regarding potential land -use and pit rehabilitation of said optioned land adjacent and beyond the 14.5 acre proposal. 3. That tne land -use "Conceptual Plan" is not being approved. 4. That the appellants and adjacent property owners expressed concerns regarding traffic, density and pit rehabilitation. 5. That the August 23, 1984 STAFF REPORT and October 2, 1984 ADDENDUM were considered. 6. That the October 2, 1984 Hearing Examiner Committee Findings 8 Order were considered and those findings are herein Findings by reference. 7. That the file of PE- 1473 -84 was considered. 8. That the proposal is located in an area designated as URBAN on the adopted Spokane County Comprehensive Plan and is within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) where Spokane City sewers will be installed. 9. That the proposed design and land -uses and density do comply with said URBAN category. 10. That both City of Spokane and Spokane County Engineer Department had indicated the existing roads can accommodate the proposed increase in traffic witn specified improvements as conditioned. 11. That concerns regarding the existing abandoned pit "safety" and "rehabilitation" are adequately being provided for with combination of reshaping some of the pit slopes to 2 to 1 grades and with safety fencing, as required by conditions of approval. 12. That tne proposed development and the required improvements for roads, sidewalks, city sewer, city water, fire protection, pit safety, fencing, rehabilitation for portions of the pit and the residential development will protect and improve the existing circumstances of said 116 acres, therefore, the proposal as conditioned will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. N0. PE-1473-84 8 ZE -88 -84 Findings of Fact, Conclusion 8 Decision WILDW00D TERRACE 13. That considering the Hearing Examiner Committee's expanded environmental evaluation of the proposal and the overall ownership and review of the above. referenced information the Board concurs with the Hearing Examiner Committee Final Declaration of Nonsignificance 14. Tnat the proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing before the Board have been met. One adjacent property owner, James Luhan, not receiving the mailed notice had indicated knowledge of this appeal hearing 2 weeks prior and was present at the appeal hearing and was given an additional week to provide written comments for Board consideration prior to the Board's decision. No written comments were submitted. . 15. That on December 4, 1984, the Board, at a regular meeting, did DENY the appeal based upon the testimonies submitted at the public hearing and other evidence available to the Board and thus make the following decision: DECISION From the foregoing Findings, the Board hereby DENIES the appeal and UPHOLDS the Hearing Examiner Committee Decision of Approval as follows: That the conditions set forth in the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee's Findings 8 Order of October 2, 1984, attached hereto as EXHIBIT "A ", are hereby adopted as Conditions of Approval. BY THE ORDER OF THE BOARD THIS /, DAY OF 984. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Chairman The above action taken by a majority vote of the Board of Spokane County Commissioners as follows: Commissioner Keith Shepard - Abstained, was not present at appeal hearing Commissioner John McBride - Aye Commissioner Grant Peterson - Aye ATTEST; WILLI DONAHUE Cle of e Boar nne ontague, eputy Mr. George V. Thompson Wallace Construction Inc. East 518 Highdrive Spokane, WA 99203 JFS /gf cc: NDV2 @1995 Public Works John Bjork, Director, Water and Hydroelectric Services Lyle Balderson, Manager, Planning Department Jim Simpson, Director of Real Estate Larry Neil, Supervising Engineer - Design Gary Nelson, County Engineer Gary Kennaly, County Engineer Verril Smale, County Engineer Jim Legat, County Utilities 13058 % I w �(J � DL D tC w RE: Construction of a Sanitary Sewer in Moran Prairie Dear Mr. Thompson: The City's construction program for 1986 includes the Moran Prairie project which proposes construction of a sanitary trunk sewer between Havana Street at Hartson Avenue and Havana Street at 35th Avenue. The new gravity sewer line which would replace the present City pumping operation at 35th Avenue would be aligned along the natural draw running between the termini. Where practical and possible City water services and storm sewer systems and /or drainage facility would parallel the sanitarysewer. Where trunk line runs through your property (most of that area between 8th Avenue and 16th Avenue and Havana Street and Carnahan Road) preliminary designs have trunk sewer, water main and drainage provisions all located in a common "green belt ". In accordance with the above schedule, City sewer and water service should be available to your property in late fall of 1986. Sincerely, Brad W. Blegen, P.E. Public Works Director City Engineer PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Brad W. Blegen, P.E., Director SKYWALK LEVEL MUNICIPAL BUILDING / SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99201 -3343 / (509) 456 -4300 � Ne. 11. s 2 0 CIECEIVED DEC 0 3 1985 SPOKANE mum ENGINEER • /esYs k2e72 C. AVo I /it./ oo4J Z 1 0 c / Zaidam / , .mss 4./ ( SY A OVGO 35 b - ,e .Y.OUstN,.iA s / 77 A3 G. 1`y / tc) q / / t�_- A4 d �/o / .o?A.C d / 0-) he-dee. 71/e.2, ter//, w �.vee 6eo .e q e o .✓ A9 ,c d A eA0c � l� yc4//4 144 4 // 4 A l A,//' tin 42 /Z � 549 07`S / .- - / 1 - - eX /5 / etee / /9S 7e e).{.) / (ocA ¢� — _�/i P- �iBi_S le_ttCCf_ ) 41 1 f- 6 g It/x1 k / /Ll .Wa0 -- rLplio L r �JLE Depth I 140.4d Ilp a Owes DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL aJea and ( 2 3 // / 3An/d / // 2/1 / de,,...Jn/ cs 5 .iii /, 4/ 4,,sg // egJG/ f- �2 Aet 17C2 e.I S s4l / S— 3 4 7 F,✓c/ O C ilsR /Af .Po6.F 9 /o Job No. II /4/ / Date 7-/'7 8.- Sheet / of 7 Section GVi /c / .'3 boor d fl,eAC e Sta / // zf By �' ° / � 7 i '1 / 4,ecA SOIL BORING RECORD Offset �.2 ' Ld Elev. G4 Hole No. L Depth ""d L}oJd 11# a 1dwes DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL a}eb oaad Z 3 S 2 if �/lora../ Si/ Sg.+icl ufi PC.4zso � dIJ4 7 9 /O // /3 // /3` E. ote• Be,ei.;r y e_n/ .2e c.E. Job No. P � # �%r - A-3 Section Sta /o /9 By /Vo // y /j le/..4 .fez's SOIL BORING RECORD Date 7-/7-Ks Sheet Z of 7 Offset ? t/ Z/ Elev. Hole No. e • l t Depth 1 a��oad Sample # DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL aiea D./ad J / 7 S 4 27 3 s, N cs-/ /7 �e 5 2 �/ 3 E,�d o G efe- ,e,„ -f ort. ,e, t_ V 4 RJC / / A/e / ,Peco.sa� - of / d S Sta � 5'/ ZO / Offset BY/lea f l p c l'to'c SOIL BORING RECORD Job No. "� /j Date / 7- Ss Sheet c ? of Section t?f /Jjuoad /a,e.4cc Hole No. 3 Elev. G� yndaa a[1.}o,ad # a Owes DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL Da d / Z pp / / / / l sge�t/ cSgido' �J, p`1/ A /Pget decd Z9.45.� // 3 5l / ,rid ,io -iN� r6r9, s,.9// / Job No. g97 SOIL BORING RECORD Section /). G p c tnc re,e, ,i ce Date 7-7 7 - 85 Sheet "of 7 Sta g $ /5 Offset .2 2 ' ,O" Elev. 6s By A. t /i fl.0 ee75 Hole No. Y Depth 1 I q a Ldwes DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL II ai.ea o.aad ?le A./ S, Shwa/ e.✓ /e - ',9i rN.cea / .�,vSA // 2 3 'Ad o` - are /�f f%,gsv /7 5 O Go e //,441 //ee ca _,+idG j Job No. ��,9//t /l/ 3 Date 7 -/ 7 ,R5" Section G[/i /I"tuobo ,e .qc Offset '9 2/ Sta 7 /z By /!moo � /// ; 2ve -e7S SOIL BORING RECORD Hole No. Sheet L C - of 2 Elev. Ga Depth a I. [10,ad I I# a Owes DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL alea <I II a.aad / 2 3 v G /1. � /5 ,desw rs, / �4 5,7A/c7/ �,�I 7 occ,4 %.J; ` sifs s/f dotells- 5 /0 2/ /Z /5 l / i:,doC e - r /5 /.f SOIL BORING RECORD Job No. "1,44/1/3 Date 7 -/7- 95 Sheet 4 of 7 Section 42, 4,_)o-a d /Qn'.2Acc Sta 44f36 Offset 22 5217 Elev. G E By /l/o // / /, , S,ecz Hole No. la Depth l a I. L40.1d IIq a Owes DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL II area 0.aad Z 3 • L. / / AtifPocu../ cs" .4".../d al ./ .II , ccG ,o 4-)4 / s A sA // Coil % S' 9 ,d 4 / i is SOIL BORING RECORD Job No./4/7 /4//-3 Date 7 —/7 ef.5 Section L[/i LPL ,,,oa r1 j ��,q c e Sta 316 B Y /14 44 / Offset a..2 ' 2 / Elev. 6 Hole No. Sheet 7 of 7 SPOKANE COUNTY COURT MOUSE July 2, 1985 Mr. George V. Thompson, President Wallace Construction, Inc. E. 518 Highdrive Spokane, WA 99203 Dear Mr. Thompson: WDH:ks cc: County Utilities - Bill Dobratz I/County Engineers - Bob Turner City Engineers - Ery Reed City Planning - Lyle Balderson n Sincerely, PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET Wallis D. Hubbard Planning Director PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 / On Friday, June 21st, the County and City departments most involved met and discussed your project as outlined in your June 10th letter. The Planning, Engineering, Utilities, and Health departments of both jurisdictions are now familiar with and ready to work with you in resolving the major sewer, water, roads, and land use issues involved. As lead agency for any further developmentactivities on your site, my depart- ment will coordinate with the other entities. The road alignment and type of road necessary to provide service beyond your site will be handled by the County Engineers and Gary Kennaly of that office is ready to discuss those requirements. The City Engineers and public works people will deal with the utility issues and discuss City participation for sewer and water systems. Joe Shine of Public Works will deal with sewer lines and John Bjork is ready to discuss water line requirements. They are investigating a sewer trunk alignment and should be contacted for their input. As you know, the Planning Department is interested in the safety and public benefit issues concerning the topography on the site and aesthetic problems of the gravel pit and the major drainage way for possible "green space" designations. Please let me know if you intend to initiate another phase of the development or if there is any way to assist or answer questions. Spokane County Engineers Planning and Traffic Division Gary W. Kennaly, P.E!' Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99260 The main areas of concern are: WALLACE CONSTRUCTION, INC. E. 518 Highdrive Spokane, WA 99203 (509) 535 -7619 June 10, 1985 RECEIVED ) JUN 101985 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Mr. Kennaly After our meeting on Friday the 7th with the City and County Planning and Engineering Depts., I would like to clarify my intent to coordinate my future plans of developing our site located East of Havana to Carnahan, South 8th Ave. to 16th with both the City and County. road alignment and type of road from Havana to Glenrose (RID) Sewer,(ULID) to service current needs and future plans of the City and County. Attached area map shows proposed RID in red and sewer, ULID in green. I would appreciate correspondence concerning any developments or recommendations made by your department which pertains to the above RID and ULID. Thank -you for your cooperation. Enclosures: gmt Sinc rely, eorgeV. Thompson President III MOE .■■l■■■11_ ... ::U 'IU �■i�' ee■e■eatn mala■a■lnd 111111111" �!:!t AR T SOU aninem 1=11•101 AIMIconanz nun 25TH AVE, 315T AVE. CORKERY RID. 44TH AVE. 2 .__ v 111.111 main. may aiaa °Bra ruii■■■a_ . ;;; ::::r: REDERI K AVE ■Te no. wirfronerstra 411■■■■■"` mutil, me. pi ®■111 ,.J FELTS FIEL( 4,0 18 TH. J — V 4. N -as- j CSLbi S L,o H C6± I.POcu MSS._ _S (LY114Bstiati _ r ss..o s., _ ktigb -.Ufa Aka- SW ILO LOAQ.A 0..frauttAc cs-t- 53s. -)6.19 .(q Cuta _ Afvui a&k - - -- SIR _4 h_ Nat 990 - tbstkok. Q3 c - = U3- _ __$Lt.AA Qui q rn __ 1 � 9 RS.__ To: J. Ronald Dunsmore Senske & Associates, Inc. S. 3009 Mt. Vernon Spokane, WA Your Loan No.: Wildwood Terrace Our Order No.: C- 168446, Unit 2 Mortgagor /Purchaser: Thompson There has been no change in the title to the property covered by our preliminary report since July 11, 1986, at 8 A.M. Except as set forth below: 1. Pendency of proceedings in the United States pistrict Court wherein the party herein named was adjudicated a bankrupt on the date herein set forth. No Trustee has been.appointed. Adjudication Date: May 12, 1986 Cause No. : 86- 01435 -K11 (Chapter 11) Party : Selector's, Inc. Attorney for Bankruptcy :.Bruce Boyden Dated as of the llth day of July, 1986, 8:00 A.M. By KO72 /mca TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY West 521 First Avenue P. 0. Box 2122 Spokane, WA 99204 -0366 Spokane, WA 99210 -2122 FOURTH SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT CC: County Engineers CC: County Planning TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Washington State Division RECEIVED 'AUG' 121986 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER - KO47 /ss Senske and Associates, Inc. Attn: J. Ronald Dunsmore S. 3009 Mt. Vernon Spokane, WA TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY West 521 First Avenue Spokane, Washington 99210 Telephone: (509) 838 -5281 REPORT FOR PLAT CERTIFICATE Refer to: C- 168446, Unit 2 RE: Thompson CC:. Planning Commission CC: County Engineer This is a report for plat certificate as of January 24,1985 at 8:00 a.m., covering the following property: Proposed Plat of Wildwood Terrace, described as follows: That part of the plat of Woodland Terrace Addition, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "I" of Plats, Page 16, in Spokane County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, Block 8; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, Block 9; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, Block 10; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, Block 19; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, Block 20; together with the South half of vacated 13th Avenue adjoining said Blocks 8, 9 and 10; together with vacated Morrill Road between said Blocks 8 and 9; together with Dearborn Road between said Blocks 9 and 10; together with Dearborn Road between said Lot 6, Block 19 and Lot 1, Block 20; together with the West half of Lloyd Road adjoining said Block 10; together with the alley within said Blocks 8, 9 and 10. Record title is vested in Wallace Construction, Inc., a Washington Corporation. 'y' 6=168446, Unit 2 - 2 - Plat Certificate SUBJECT TO: 1. Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness of the amount herein stated. Amount : $330,000.00 Dated : November 30, 1984 Recorded : December 3, 1984 Auditor's No. : 8412030004 Grantor : George V. Thompson and Teresa D. Thompson, husband and wife; and Wallace Construction Inc., a Washington Corporation Trustee : Ticor Title Insurance Company, a corporation Beneficiary : Selectors Inc., a Washington corporation Affects : Said premises and other property 2. Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness of the amount herein stated. Amount : $60,000.00 Dated : December 19, 1984 Recorded : December 20, 1984 Auditor's No. : 84122000034 Grantor : George V. Thompson and Teresa D. Thompson, husband and wife; and Wallace Construction Inc., a Washington corporation Trustee : Transamerica Title Insurance Company, a corporation Beneficiary : Selectors Inc., a Washington corporation Affects : Said premises and other property This report shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the certificate applied for. No charge KO47 /ss TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Spokane County Office Authorize.- ySignatory v FROM ANGLE DIST AUTO INV 14TH & 15TH AVE CENTERLINE 2/21/85 *$*** START 15 INV S 0 29 27.0 E 330.5200 16 INV S 89 56 51.0 E 2630.1500 9 INV N 0 23 39.0 W 330"4600 25 INV N 89 56 48.0 W 2630.6700 NORTH EAST TO 1661.01574 994.33717 15 1330.50787 997.16858 16 1328.09787 3627.31748 9 1658.55005 3625^04410 1660.99879 994.37523 26 25 LAT & DEP 0.01695 —0.03807 26 HCLOSE N 65 59 39.4 W 0.0417 1661.01574 994.33717 15 PREC=1 TO 142099 869275"41ft 19.9558ac 43 2 To: J. Ronald Dunsmore Senske 6 Associates, Inc. S. 3009 Mt. Vernon Spokane, WA Your Loan No.: Wildwood Terrace Our Order No.: C- 168446, Unit 2 Mortgagor /Purchaser: Thompson There has been no change in the title to the property covered by our preliminary report since July 11, 1986, at 8 A.M. Except as set forth below: 1. Pendency of proceedings in the United States pstrict Court wherein the party herein named was adjudicated a bankrupt on the date herein set forth. No Trustee has been.appointed. Adjudication Date: May 12, 1986 Cause No. : 86- 01435 -K11 (Chapter 11) Party : Selector's, Inc. Attorney for Bankruptcy : Bruce Boyden Dated as of the 11th day of July, 1986, 8:00 A.M. KO72 /mca TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY West 521 First Avenue P. O. Box 2122 Spokane, WA 99204 -0366 Spokane, WA 99210 -2122 FOURTH SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT - - RECEIVED IAUG` 121986 SPOKANE OOUNTY ENGINEER CC: County Engineers CC: County Planning TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Washington State Division By /v1 /i ll 14-7.v0\ FROM ANGLE AUTO INV SW 1/4 2/20/85 ***** START 1 INV S 0 29 27.0 E 2 INV S 89 56 55.0 E 3 INV N 0 23 39.0 w 4 INV S 89 59 25.0 W 2644.1400 2629.5700 2646.9200 2634"O0O0 DIST NORTH EAST TO 3644.04298 1000.00000 997.64153 3644.49889 3644.05194 iAT & DEP -0.00896 5 HCLOSE S 50 16 41.1 W 0"0140 3644.04298 PREC=1 TO 752601 6962261"26ft 159"8315ac 977.34883 1000.00000 3629.56894 3611.35958 977"35962 -0,01079 FROM ANGLE * * * ** START 2321.06455 3620.45424 7 FROM AUTO INV WOODLAND TERRACE BREAKDOWN 2/20/85 * * * ** START 2321.06455 7 INV N 89 58 45.0 W 1 523. 7000 2321.61858 N 89 58 45.0 W 359.3600 2321.74925 FROM 10 INV 11 INV 12 INV 13 INV 6 INV 14 INV 1.5 INV 16 INV 2 INV 18 INV 19 INV 20 INV 21 INV 3 INV 22 INV 23 I'NV N 89 58 45.0 W N 89 58 45.0 W N 89 58 45.0 W S 0 29 27.0 E S 0 29 27.0 E S 0 29 27.0 E S 0 29 27.0 E S 89 56 55.0 E S 89 56 55.0 E S 89 56 55.0 E S 89 56 55.0 E S B9 56 55.0 E N 0 23 39.0 W N 0 2 . 3 39.0 W N 0 23 39.0 W • ANGLE ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO DIST 359.3600 359.3600 30.0000 330.5100 330.5200 330.5200 330.5200 30.0000 359.4100 359.4100 759.4100 1521.3400 330.4700 330.4600 330.4700 DIST * * *24 START N 0 23 39.0 W 332.0600 NORTH EAST TO 3620.45424 7 2096.75434 10 1737.39437 11 2321.87991 1378.03439 12 2322.01058 1018.67442 13 2322.02149 988.67442 6 1991.52362 991.50575 14 1661.01574 994.33717 15 1330.50787 997. 16858 16 1000.00000 1000.00000 2 999.97309 1029.99999 18 999.65074 1389.40984 19 999.32838 1748.81970 20 999.00602 2108.22955 21 997.64153 3629.56894 3 1328.10370 3627.29549 22 1658.55588 3625.02211 23 1989.01806 3622.74865 24 NORTH EAST TO FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO AUTO INV N1/2 SW 1/4 2/20/85 ***** START 3644.04298 977"34883 1 1 INV S 0 29 27.0 E 1322"0700 2322.02149 988,67442 6 6 INV S 89 58 45.0 E 2631,7800 2321.06455 3620^45424 7 7 INV N 0 23 39"0 W 1323.4600 3644°49323 3611.34956 8 LAT & DEP 0.00566 0"01002 8 HCLOSE N 60 32 06.1 E 0.0115 3644.49889 3611^35958 4 PREC=1 TO 458573 NO AREA FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO AUTO INV . BLOCK 1 PLAT BDRY 2/21/85 ***** START 1991.46660 1051.50572 27 27 INV S 89 56 44.0 E 1048"1100 1990.47065 2099"61525 28 28 INV S 0 29 50.0 E . 300"5000 1689,98197 2102"22300 29 29 INV N 89 56 48.0 W 1048.1500 1690.95763 1054^07346 30 30 INV N 0 29 27.0 W 300.5200 1991.46660 1051.49904 31. - - LAT & DEP 0"00000 0^00668 31 HCLOSE N 89 59 56.9 E 0.0067 1991.46660 1051.50572 27 PREC=1 TO 403556 314960.15ft 7.2305ac FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO BLOCK 1 SL 2/21/85 ***m* START 1991.46660 1051.50572 27 27 INV S 89 56 44.0 E 1048.1100 1990.47065 2099.61525 28 28 INV S 0 29 50.0 E 300"5000 1689.98197 2102.22300 29 29*30 ` 29 TRAV N 89 5648,0 W 1028.3400 1690,93919 1073.88345 • 32 RADIAL S 0 03 12.0 W DELTA 89 27 21.0 R• RAD 20.0000 : TAN 19,8109 L-ARC 31.2260 RADIAL S 89 30 33.0 W RP 1710.93918 1073"90207 33 32 CHORD N 45 13 07"5 W 28.1496 1710.76785 1053°90280 34 TAN@PT N 0 29 27.0 W 30*31 34 TRAV N 0 29 27.0 W 280"7100 1991.46755 1051.49808 35 ___^_^~_ ' � � -------------- _ ' _ ---- . ~ LAT & DEP -0.00095 0.00764 35 HCLOSE S 82 55 54.4 E 0.0077 1991"46660 1051.50572 27 PREC=1 TO 349354 314876.48ft 7.2286ac LAT & DEP - 0.00310 41 HCLOSE S 11 00 49.,0 W 0.0032 1630.01077 PREC =1 TO 498505 85141.79ft 1.9546ac FROM ANGLE DIST AUTO INV BLOCK 2 PLAT BDRY 2/21/85 * * * ** START 37 INV N 89 56 48.0 W 658.7700 38 INV S 0 29 35.0 E 129.2500 39 INV S 89 56 49.0 E 658.7800 40 INV N 0 29 50.0 W 129.2500 NORTH 1630.01077 1630.62398 1501.37876 1500.76874 1630.01387 LAT & DEP -0.00310 41 HCLOSE S 11 00 49.0 W 0.0032 1630.01077 PREC =1 TO 498505 85141.79ft 1.9546ac FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH BLOCK 2 SL 2/21/85 * * * ** START 39 INV S 89 56 49.0 E 658.7800 40 *41 40 TRAV N .0 29 50.0 W 109.4400 RADIAL N 89 3010.0 E DELTA 89 26 57.0 LT RAD 20.0000 TAN 19.8086 L -ARC . 31.2236 RADIAL N 0 03 13.0 E RP 42 CHORD N 45 13 18.5 W 28.1480 TAN @PT N 89 56 47.0 W 37 *38 44 TRAV N 89 56 48.0 W 618.7700 1630.60702 RADIAL N 0 03 12.0 E DELTA 90 32 47.0 LT RAD 20.0000 TAN 20.1916 L -ARC 31.6067 RADIAL S 89 30 25.0 W RP 45 CHORD S 44 46 48.5 W 28.4188 TAN @PT S 0 29 35.0 E 38 *39 47 TRAV S 0 29 35.0 E 109.0600 1501.37896 1501.37876 1500.76874 1610.20462 1610.03106 1630.07105 1610.60703 1610.43493 LAT & DEP -0.00020 48 HCLOSE S 60 05 30.5 W 0.0004 1501.37876 PREC =1 TO 7885213 84971.25ft 1.9507ac -0.00060 2072.74233 37 EAST TO 2072.74233 37 1413.97261 38 1415.08485 39 2073.86457 40 2072.74293 41 -0.00060 2072.7437 37 EAST TO 1415.08485 39 2073.86457 40 2072,91484 2052.91560 43 2052.93431 44 1434.16458 45 1434.14596 46 1414.14670 47 1415.08520 48 - 0.00035 1415.08485 39 <- PAY TO H E DEP THOMPSON ENTERPRISES, INC. WALLACE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. EAST 518 HIGH DRIVE (509) 535-7619 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99204 - to;?9-: sts RECEIPT Date . 19 tri ? - Received From L Address r 4 ;,/ For l/.- 1_101 c. C. ri - 7 L. I J. AMT. OF ACCOUNT Aml. PAiD BALANCE DUE 88808 ACCOUN; HOW PAID CASH CHECK MONEY ORDER By 1 ONB Spokane Main Office OldNational Bank Spokane, Washington 89201 4 j /red Dollars $ ic ./.,/ DATE 1851 28-3/1251 AMO NT o p_ e r U 33,4 000 /85 LH' 1.2S /000 31-0:001.8th 371,01910 fjnriTerlirrnaltrWTWTWWIT2RAPATTIII • • g•TStiliflIgN1-1^KR•V'WONTfleTTISINTWT1tCO•n331 j SENSKE & ASSOCIATES, " - 'C. Civil Engineers /Land Surve __s S. 3009 Mt. Vernon Suite 101 SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99203 -4775 (509) 534 -5272 Spokane County Engineers To N. 811 Jefferson St."'...'.. Spokane, Wa. 99260 -0170 Attn. Mr. Jerry Sims, P.L.S. lETscoi mos Date Subject LETTER 02/06/85 Wildwood Terrace Please find attached a copy of the Certificate to Plat for this project. .. _ _....._._ _.._.. Also attached are 2 copies of the revised dedication for this date. ❑ Please reply ❑ No reply necessary RFD FEB 6.1985 Comb' Engineering _ _. SIGNED SENSKE & ASSOCIATES, "'C. Civil Engineers /Land Survey S. 3009 Mt. Vernon Suite 101 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99203 -4775 (509) 534 -5272 Spokane County Engineers To N. 811 Jefferson..St. - -- Spokane, Wa. 99260 -0170 Attn. Mr. Jerry Sims, P.L.S. M Date Subject 01/25/85 LETTER Wildwood Terrace Please find attached 2 copies of the proposed final map and of the - - -- proposed dedication -- for- Wlldwood- Terrace. ❑ Please reply ❑ No reply necessary RECEIVED JAN 25 1985 .. ....................... County Engineering SIGNED ba c/ful-ti-Lre-c- SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Spokane County Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee on August 23, 1984 and the members of the Committee present being Jerry Williams, Chairperson, Ron McVicker and Rich Skalstad. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Wallace Construction, Inc. is requesting approval of a preliminary plat of PE- 1473 -84, Wildwood Terrace, and Zone Reclassification, ZE- 88 -84, from Agricultural to R -2 and Multiple Family Suburban for subdivision of 14.5 acres of "Woodland Terrace" into 27 lots for 22 divided duplexes and 5 multiple - family structure, and there being present, the following applicant or representative: GEORGE THOMPSON C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the information presented in the STAFF REPORT was considered. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as URBAN. 3. That the proposal is within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. 4. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of this proposal, as change in existing lifestyle; incompatible land -uses; issues regarding rehabilitatiohand operation of the gravel pit; existence of improper fencing; operation of a pit within 1,000 feet of residential development; traffic; fire protection; "foot- in -the- door" for other development; vacation of roads; who pays for cost of improvements; value of the new houses and vacation process for dedicated roads. 5. That "overall safety" of a proposal is a consideration of a preliminary plat decision. 6. That changing the zoning on this proposal does not prevent animal keeping on existing adjacent properties and constitutes a classic land -use conflict between Agricultural and Multiple Family Suburban zoning. 7. Havana Road in the City may need to be improved. 8. Landfill and the pit rehabilitation need to be addressed. 9. That Urban "fill -in" does not mean you stick MFS in a single family area. 10. That the pit area will develop and density of this proposal might be justifiable if the entire optioned ownership (118 acres) is looked at for proposed use. ATTEST: August 23, 1984 File No. PE- 1473 -84 Findings & Order Wildwood Terrace 11. That the entire optioned ownership should be made part of the preliminary plat. 12. That the mining regulations need to be looked at. 13. That an EIS should be done to address the pit. 14. That the hearing should be continued to October 2, 1984, to allow the sponsor time to provide additional information requested by the Hearing Examiner Committee. D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS DECISION Continue this Hearing item to October 2, 1984 at 9:00 A.M. E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Preliminary Plat PE- 1473 -84, Wildwood Terrace, and Zone Reclassification ZE -88 -84 from Agricultural to R -2 and MFS be continued to October 2, 1984. Motion by: Rich Skalstad Seconded by: Ron McVicker Jerry Williams - Aye Ron McVicker - Aye Rich Skalstad - Aye JOHN NUNNERY Spokane County Subdivision Administrator By: ( 6— ksilAA Date: a As at HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER AND VOTE. APPLICATION 18.; (116 ').... `19.;.,(145 :.):: 20. .Y 21: ,(14r) 22.: (150 .°:) 23. (151., ) • I . SEPA M••ILING. LIS •PROPONENT: WA Stale: Department. of Ecology (Olympia)' WA: State ,Department Ecology (Spokane), WA State Dept. of Social & Health Services Spokane County Health • District. School 'District4-$ / ..•:i ".` Fire District Wi Water District :Office of the Mayor '(City of Spokane)., Spokane County Boundary Review Board Spokane City Plan Commission WA .State Parks & Recreation Comm. (Olympia) WA State Dept: of Natural Resources (Colville).. WA. State Dept. of Game (Spokane) • U .S. Housing •& Urban Development (Spokane) Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority.: WA. State Dept. of Transportation (Spokane) Fairchild. Air Force'. Base Commander's Office • ' ATTN:• Jim "Hall, 92CSC /DEEV Spokane International' Airport, .ATTN: Airports Director..... Town of Airway Heights City of Cheney City of Deer: Park Town of Medical Lake • Town. of Millwood •• ., ; Ee 1473®84 i vE ZEDS '' ®84 2 :/ =2 -- October 2, 1984 ADDENDUM— , * to the e < •STAFFF REPORT August 23, 1984 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF RE: PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE- 1473 -84, WILDWOOD TERRACE ZE- 88 -84, Agricultural to R -2 and Multiple Family Suburban SPONSOR: George Thompson Wallace Construction, Inc. S.3009 Mt. Vernon Spokane, WA 99203 The sponsor had signed and provided a valid "division -of- land" application, which include permission from the land owner in the form of a Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement. Land = H &E by Mr. Etter Optioned Purchaser = George Thomson Enterprises Closing Atty -at -Law = John Crowley Agent = Gary A. Myers & Co. This option agreement is for purchase of 116,/- acres, which includes the 14.5 acres for the proposal. DISCLOSURE: Jane Myers being the wife of Gary A. Myers and being the President of the Spokane County Planning Commission did appoint Rich Skalstad to the Hearing Examiner Committee as substitute for Kathy Carstens. Jane Myers having a financial interest (through her husband) in this proposal did not discuss or attempt to influence the Planning Department Staff or the Planning Department Director. That three members of the Planning Commission who serve on the Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee (Jerry Williams- chairperson, Ron McVicker, and Rich Skalstad) make independent decisions on these matters. That approval by two or more of these three members is required to "carry' a decision on any proposal. -1- ADDENDUM October 2, PE- 1473 -84 PROPOSAL: The proposal remains the same as indicated on the application ( and as described in the Aug.23rd Staff Report ). The sponsor had paid all the necessary fees and staff had found the application to be valid. The proposal continues to be 14.5 acres tor 22 lots for duplexes and 5 lots for 25 unit apartments with applicable zone changes, as indicated on the Preliminary Plat -of- Record dated July 10,1984. NOTE: The sponsor has since agreed to rehabilitate portions of the north and adjacent pit prior to installation of Footing & Foundations to the adjacent multiple family structures. Additionally, the sponsor has given up on the idea " of having a lake in the pit area. See "Pit Rehabilitation" below and see the green sheets - Sponsor's Narrative to "Conceptual Plan ". DEPARTMENT & AGENCY RESPONSES: (prior to Aug_ 23rd) That all applicable departments and agencies had been notified of the proposal and all comments received was specified in the August 23, 1984 STAFF REPORT. The below, as listed, did not find the proposal to have problems persuant to recommended conditions -of- approval. The following notices were sent and comments requested for the Aug.23 Staff Report: County Engineering Dept. = conditions recommended County Health District = conditions recommended County Utilities Dept. = conditions recommended County Bldg.& Safety Dept. = standard conditions County Boundary Review Board = requested copy of the decision County Air Pollution Control Authority = no comment City of Spokane Planning Dept. = no comment City of Spokane Zoning & Subdiv. Dept. = no comment City of Spokane Utilities Dept. = comment on application form and Havan Street conditions recommended by phone City of Spokane Engineering Dept. = no comment Wash. State Dept. of Ecology (spokane) = no comment Wash. State Dept. of Social &Health Service = no comment Wash. State Dept. of Transportation (spokane) = no comment Note: no comment typically means the agency /dept. does not have jurisdiction or does not have any problems with the proposal. ADDENDUM October 2, 1. PE- 1473 -84 DEPARTMENT & AGENCY RESPONSES: ( for Oct2nd.Hearing ) A second contact was made after August 23, 1984 Hearing by the County planning staff regarding the "Conceptual Plan Inland Pit Rehabilitation ". County Engineering Dept. = NEW conditions recommended County Health District = same as before County Utilities Dept. = same as before City of Spokane Planning Dept. = no recommendations City of Spokane Utilities Dept. = NEW conditions recommended City of Spokane Engineering Dept. = no recommendations Wash. State Dept. of Ecology (spokane) = no recommendations Wash. State Dept. of Ecology (olympia) = no recommendations Wash. State Dept. of Transportation (spokane) = no recommend- ations Wash. State Dept. of Natural Resorces = no recommendation b ut indicated they would provide a courtesy review and comment if requested, but they do not have jurisdiction. All the above indicated that they either do not have jurisdiction or they will review the remaining subdivision and zone proposals for the rest of the 116 acres when they are submitted in the future. The Proposal as specified for the 14.5 Acres stands on its own and does not require the total ownership to receive approval at this time PIT REHABILITATION: DNR - The Washington State Department of Natural Resouces has indicated that the Inland Pit north and adjacent this 14.5 acre proposal does not come under their jurisdiction, since it was prior the regulations now enforced by DNR. However, DNR did agree to provide a "courtesy review & comment" on any rehabilitation plan that may be developed for the pit area, if such expertise is needed - - -- But, DNR would not regulate or enforce such pit rehabilitation. LAKE - As indicated on the "Conceptual Plan" and in the attached narrative, the sponsor does not plan to develop a lake in the pit area. If a water body were proposed in the pit area with future subdivision and zone proposals all departments and agencies having responsibility for such water bodies would review and comment at that time. Todays standards and regulations would require Wash. State Department of Ecology to be involved if 10 Acre feet or more water were involved. Again, no lake is proposed. -3- ADDENDUM October 2; PIT REHABILITATION: (cont'd) PE 1473 - 84 HISTORY- The pit was in existence prior to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners granting a zone reclassifiction on April 24, 1959 from Unclassified Zone to Rock Quarry,Sand and Gravel Pit Zone ( known today as Alining Zone ). That mining zone persuant the 1957 Spokane Zoning Ordinance allowed mining to take place within 50 feet of a road or property line in the Agricultural Zone ( other residential zones required 1000 feet separation). The 1957 Zoning Ordinance required the pit walls to have a slope no greater than 1:1 ( 1 foot horizontal to 1 foot vertical ) or 45 degrees. The 1957 Ordinance included provisions for pit rehabilitation "as deemed reasonable by the County Road Engineer and Planning Director as well as those specifically set forth in the land use permit authorizing the pit operation" - -- no such rehabilitation plan is known to exist and the Board's Resolution approving the Zone Change did not have specific conditions -of- approval. Staff understands the pit was shut down sometime in the late 1960's or early 1970's. The sponsor's agent indicates the pit is used to store gravel or sand materials in the pit area from time to time, but no mining has taken place for years; however, dumping of concrete, ecavated materials, and other materials in the pit has taken place over the past few years. EXISTING PIT SLOPES - The sponsor engaged a Wash. State Licenced Engineer to develop four cross sections of the pit to better define the shape and characteristics of the pit. The profiles are: A - A = 8th Ave. thru the center of the pit to 14th Ave. BBB = Havana at City 10th Ave eastward toward Carnahan Rd. C - C = Havana at City 9th Ave eastward toward Carnahan Rd. PROPOSED ARTERIAL CENTERLINE = 8th & Havana southeast thru the pit to 14th Ave. and continuing to 16th Ave extended The elevations used to prepare these profiles are a Walker Aerial Photographic Topography Map and is the base for the map "Concep - tual Plan- Inland Pit Rehabilitation" submitted by the sponsor. The profiles indicate that most of the Pit walls or slopes are approximately 1:1 (45 degrees) or less. ADDENDUM October 2, 1 84 PE- 1473-84 PIT REHABILITATION: (cont'd) SITE GRADING - Lots 1 thru 5 of Block 1 of the proposal (the MFS lots) are to be graded and shaped with a 12 foot drop from 14th Ave. northward to the north lotlines. The sponsor indicates this will provide proper drainage and provide "View" apartment units on the north end of each of these lots - -- as shown on the Typical "L" Apartment Design. MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS - The sponsor has received approval for $1,825,000.00 Multi- family Mortgage Revenue Bonds (FNMA Backed Securities Program) for a number of multi- family units north of 14th Ave. and east of Havana. The development will be required to conform to related terms and regulations. PROPOSED PIT SLOPES - Since significant excavation and grading will be involved on the MFS lots, the sponsor agrees to reshape the southerly pit slopes (walls) to a slope of 2:1 ( 2 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical ) prior to constructing footings & foundations for the multifamily structures, as shown on the "Conceptual Plan ": Quadrant 4 = rehab. pit slopes prior to comencing construction on Lots 1,2 and 3 of Block 1 of the proposal. Quadrant 3 = rehab. pit slopes prior to comencing construction on Lots 4 and 4 of Block 1 of the proposal. FENCING - REQUIREMENTS - fence conditions of the Aug 23, 84 Staff Report would continue to apply to all slopes deemed to be unsafe and is on the sponsor's property. Note, that the pit slopes along the Havana right -of -way in the vicinity of City 8th & 9th Avenues are beyond the sponsor's ownership; therefore, rehabilitation of that portion of the pit slope is not possible by the sponsor. REHABILITATION PLAN - The County Planning Department and County Engineer, in reviewing the sponsor's proposal for approval of a Pit Rehabilitation Plan, are recommending that the sponsor be required to have a Wash. State Licenced Engineer (PE) provide both departments with a signed, stamped and certified copy of this plan. Spokane County will then review said plan and may request DNR or other agencies of expertise to review and comment on the "certified" Pit Rehabilitation Plan. Upon deter- mining that said plan is complete and properly certified, the footings & foundations will be allowed to be constructed. -The Plan will be required to address proper ground cover and /or grading for erosion control of the slopes. ADDENDUM October 2, CONCEPTUAL PLAN: PE- 1473 -84 The "Conceptual Plan- Inland Pit Rehabilitation" indicates a potential land -use and rehabilitation scheme for the 116 acres optioned by the sponsor. The plan represents a "realistic" concept as evaluated by two experienced consultants in the development community of Spokane County, John Konen - a professional planner and Mike Senske - a licenced engineer. The Plan represents an optimum density concept, which considers the existing topography of the Walker base map, current regulations for the various residential zones, consideration for drainage, consideration for overall /community -wide traffic circulation needs, and land -use transition from MFS to the existing and proposed land -uses, all being "best fit" to the Pit, to the view, to reasonable development costs and to the MFS Lots of the Proposal. MULTI- FAMILY DWELLINGS - The "Conceptual Plan" indicates that the MFS Lots of the proposal would be contiguous to future multi - family structures all being "view dwellings" around the rehabilitated pit slopes. The sponsor indicates that higher density type development is necessary to incorporate the cost of rehab- ilitating the pit and developing the area. POTENTIAL COMMUNITY ARTERIAL - The "Conceptual Plan" and the profile for the proposed arterial both show that a much needed north -south arterial for southeast Spokane City. Glenrose, and Moran Prairie is possible through this 116 acres. The arterial would allow connection to Havana at 8th Avenue, run southeast through the the 116 acre optioned site to the south end of the optioned property at 16th Avenue extended - - -- other aquisitions southeast along the natural drainage way would allow connection to Glenrose Road or Carnahan Road. The profile indicates that the proposed arterial would not exceed the maximum 8% grade and would have mar inal cuts and fills. The 14.5 acre proposal does not need the arterial, as the existing road system is adequate with curb and paving improvements, as indicated by both the City and County Engineering Departments. 6 ADDENDUM October 2, i4 PE- 1473 -84 CONCEPTUAL PLAN: (cont'd) POTENTIAL COMMUNITY ARTERIAL (cont'd) County Engineering indicates a similar alignment had been considered by the County a number of years ago and that should such a major arterial be proposed in the future - -- more detailed analysis of the site and adjoining lands will be necessary before a final alignment is determined. Additional detailed studies will be required relative to area -wide traffic flows and volumes, drainage, and stormwater disposal before final development plans and densities can be determined [i.e. the area designated as single family (R -1) along the easterly side of the "Conceptual Plan" is affected by a designated Flood Hazard Zone], which could substantially impact density, design, street location, etc. The County Engineering Department indicates that the 116 acre "Conceptual Plan" showing an estimated optimum development of 772 dwelling units. At this density, a total of 5,132 Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends can be anticipated. In addition to access streets which will serve the future building sites and lots, it will be necessary to provide an arterial roadway in order to facilitate traffic flows to and from the conceptual development. The arterial street proposed in the conceptual plan could accom- modate projected traffic volumes if it were constructed to an appropriate standard. Note: The 14.5 acre Proposal does not need the proposed arterial, as the existing road system is adequate with curb and paving improvements, as indicated by both the City and County Engineering /Utilities Departments. EXISTING ROADS: City of Spokane Utilities Department indicates the traffic generated from the 14.5 acre Proposal can be accommodated by the existing streets and recommends that Havana be conditioned for improve- ments fronting the proposal for its half of Havana Street. County Engineer recommended conditions of approval remain the same as shown in the Aug 23, 1984 Staff Report. Additionally, the County Engineering Department indicates that Wildwood Terrace Proposal of 14.5 acres would, at full occupancy, generate approx- imately 1,030 Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends. This is approx imately the same volume of traffic which would be expected from a development of 102 single- family residences. ADDENDUM October 2, 1,64 PE- 1473-84 EXISTING ROADS: (cunt'd) The roadway improvements which have been specified for 14th, 15th & 16th Avenues and Lloyd & Morrill Streets will adequately accommodate traffic generated within the development. The existing County Road System will accommodate the traffic which would be generated by the 14.5 acre Proposed plat. Any improve- ments required by the City of Spokane will also enhance traffic movement into the City Street System. LAND -USE COMPATIBILITY: The "Conceptual Plan" shows that the 14.5 acre proposal can be compatable to future development of Multi- family along the rim of the pit. The "Conceptual Plan" also shows a mixed land -use with transition from high density to lower density single- family. This land -use pattern exists in the City of Spokane and exists in the County as close as east and adjacent Carnahan Road. WATER & SEWER SYSTEMS: The 14.5 acre Proposal will be served by City of Spokane public sewer and water systems. The development of the Proposal site is not necessary to serve the remaining land of the 116 acre optioned land. FIRE. POLICE. & EMERGENCY PROTECTION: Fire protection, police protection and emergency vehicle access will all be improved with the development of this 14.5 Acre Proposal, since the existing roads will be improved and water and fire hydrants extended. The development of the rest of the 116 acres is not required for these improvements. However, if the 14.5 acre Proposal is developed it will increase the potential for the remaind er of the 116 acres to develop similar the the conept plan - -- which would improve all of the above services primarily through the development of the major arterial. -8 ADDENDUM October 2, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 HEALTH & SAFETY: With the development of the 14.5 acre Proposal, which includes the reshaping of some of the pit walls and slopes and includes extending City of Spokane public sewer system, both public safety and health will be improved. The development of the remainder of the 116 acres does not require the 14.5 acre Proposal to develop first. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The 14.5 acre Proposal remains the same as originally circulated to other agencies of jurisdiction. As indicated on the above pages Planning Department staff did contact various agencies to confirm there review of the original "Proposed Declaration of Non - Significance' with the agreed reshaping of portions of the pit and no change was made. Staff in further considering the additional information submitted by the sponsor regarding the pit and the 116 acres and the com- ments by the various departments or agencies, confirms its original declaration of "Non- Significance" for the following reasons: 1. the 14.5 acre Proposal remains non - functionally related to the rest rest of the 116 acres, 2. the remainder of the 116 acres does not require the 14.5 ac. to be developed first to assure the next phase of develop- ment (if any), 3. the 14.5 acre Proposal could be the only development in the 116 acres and the results of such a development would only be an improvement to the public health, safety,and welfare; specifically the reduction in the existing pit safety problem and provide for "urban" fill -in development. Or said differ- ently, eliminate or reduce existing environmental impacts. Consistant with the definition "PROPOSAL" in the SEPA Guidelines the balance of the 116 acres in not subject of ° - -- a specific request to undertake any activity submitted to, and seriously considered b>:, - - -" Spokane County. The 14.5 acre Proposal is not interdependent on developing of the remaining . 116 acres and Visa Versa. The Proposal can stand on its own, as conditioned. The sponsor has not request approval or assurances be given beyond the proposal and Spokane County is not granting any approval or assurances beyond the Proposal. THE "CONCEP- TUAL PLAN" IS NOT BEING APPROVED, it is only being used as information to evaluate possible land -use compatability and the pit. -9- NAPRATIVE TO CONCEPTUAL PLAN OF THE INLAND PIT REHABILITATION & P.E. 1473 -84 The following discussion is a follow -up to the specific proposal of P.E. 1473 -84. At the original hearing of August 23; 1984.of P.E. 1473 -84, several questions were brought up by the Hearing Examiner Committee regarding the overall development proposal of the clients ownership. :Attached is a conceptual plan addressing several questions raised at the hearing including pit safety, residential development, traffic and fire protection. The status of the preliminary request for twenty -two (22) duplex units and one hundred twenty five (125) multi family units has not changed. Fhe attacted conceptual plan identifies a potential development pattern of single family, R2 and multi - family suburban uses totalling seven hundred seventy two (772) dwelling units with a net density of 6.7 dwelling units per gross acre, The overall . '^nsi.ty is well within the Comprehensive Plan guidelines for this Urban Category Area. Within the concept is a proposed arterial aligned with Havanna and continuing south toward Glenrose Road. The multi- family and R2 areas have. been laid out adjacent to this intense traffic pattern. The single family areas are in locations served by the proposed arterial but not directly abutting it. Within the proposed conceptual plan, traffic will be generated to the extent of 6000 ADT focusing on Havanna and its access to employment and shopping facilities within the Spokane Valley and downtown areas via Interstate 90. The arterial would provide not only exceptional access for traffic, but also fire and emergency vehicles from the existing facilities in the valley floor to the upper levels of the project area. It also would release the sub- stantial burden to Prat, 12th Avenue and other existing city streets to the west. Wallace Construction Inc. understands the need for this connection if the attached conceptual plan becomes a reality. The abandoned pit site has been evaluated for potential rehabilitation. Attached are cross sections of the proposed pit in sections A -A, B -B and r -C. No specific plan has been developed although the following criteria is acceptable to 'Wallace Construction Inc. The shaded areas on the plan will be slope of 2:1 (or flatter) by field engineering. If this slope rnnnot be attained, that is if the slopes are greater (steeper) than 2:1, then Spokane County Engineers and other appropriate agency reviews and approvals will be sought. The pit has been segmented off into four (4) quadrants. Wallace Construction Inc. will agree to rehabilitate each quadrant of the pit to the above mentioned criteria prior to requesting building permit within each quadrant for development north of 14th Avenue. Additionally, fencing of the balance of the pit site will be provided with initial rehabilitation to eliminate alT public access. Thus the proposal that is before the Planning Commission, when and if constructed, will require substantial improvements in quadrants 3 and 4. The only area 01' the pit site which will not be reclaimed and rehabilitated by Wallace Construction Inc. is that area which lied adjacent to 9th Avenue and Havanna where existing construction and improvements along with lack of ownership west of Havanna would not allow such. P E - 1473.84 - 10 - C 1 I SEP 27 1984 SPOKANE COUNTf PLA !N!NG DEPARTMENT Narrative Page 2 A lake is not a specific part of the proposed rehabilitation of this pit site. Whatever ultimate use is made within the shaded dedicated . open space areas will be submitted for further review and approval to all necessary regulatory agencies at such time as it is determined necessary. P.E 1473 -84 may be the first phase of an ultimate development program however, it .is wholely located within areas not significantly impacted by the pit site rehabilitation. Note however, that Wallace Construction Inc. has acknowledged pit improvements within quadrants 3 and 4 anyway. [he development lying south of 14th Avenue is physically separate from the balance by 14th Avenue, thus Wallace Construction Inc. requests that the project as a whole be approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee but that it be reviewed and considered as two separate parts. That multi- family suburban area lying north of 14th Avenue being designated as area 'A' and that lying south of 14th Avenue, R -2, being designated as area 'B'. Should testimony and concerns for the pit site rehabilitation become a questioned factor in the decision process, Wallace Construction Onc. would request that area 'A' and 'B' be considered on their separate merit. PE - 1473 -84 P t 147 3- 1141 eC(, Supplemental 5 ra Expanded Enivornmenta1 Ep Checklist SP 198 P LQW - F i c i t il e COUNT Pit Site Rehabilitation Wildwood Terrace The following data is the result of a conceptual plan to rehabilitate the Inland Asphalt Pit site located at 14th and Havana. The primary considerations addressed within this expanded check list are the physical features of the pit site itself and the impacts of its rehabilitation including surrounding land uses. The basis for these comments is the possible development of the Inland site pursuant to a conceptual plan attached. No specific plans exist for the phased development of this site. Environmental Impacts Earth The sloping of the pit site to a field engineered minimum slope of 2:1 will reduce substantially most of the existing potential dangers existing within the pit s.i.te. Ownerships to the west and existing housing will negate the potential for reduction of slopes in the vicinity of the western face of the pit. Fencing will be provided along this face if access permits. Fencing will be placed around all accesses to the pit (with the possible exception of the portion mentioned above) as the first phase is developed within quadrant #4. Each quadrant will be sloped to 2:1 or flatter unless specific engineering proposals are approved by the Spokane County Engineer and other regulatory agencies. Water No specific plans have been developed that would adversely impact surface or ground waters. Land Use The- attached conceptual plan identifies a potential development pattern impacted by not only the pit: rehabilitation but also the proposed arterial to replace the inadequate Carnahan alignment. Note that previous zone change requests in the vicinity of the Mining Zone at Carnahan and 8th avenue have included a mix of not only single family but also multifamily. This is a valid and accepted use not only to economically justify the expense of the pit site rehabilitation but also to create a buffer from this previous mining activity and proposed arterial extension of Havana towards Glenrose - 12- i Road. In the areas adjacent to the proposed arterial but not significantly impacted by the previous mining activities R2 development has been proposed for transition to single family. These uses all fit within the concepts outlined for fill -in development within the Urban Catergory of the recently adopted Spokane County Comprehensive Plan. If devlopment of the concept should occur after further review by the Spokane County Planning Commission and staff, it would represent transition from a disadvantaged area to the adjacent ownerships. Land use within the conceptual plan would be made compatible via carefully developed site specific plans, reviewed by staff and Planning Commission to ensure proper transition and neighborhood compatibility. Transportation The ultimate development of the conceptual plan would create 6000 ADT. However, beyond the present proposal before the hearing examiner committee, it would be necessary for the implementation of the proposed arterial connecting at 8th and Havana. This arterial access with I -90 and shopping and employment centers will focus 80 to 95 percent of the traffic north on Havana and not impact the residential streets to the west. Existing I -90 interchanges are in place for accepting this traffic loading. However, signalization will be required at 8th, 4th and 3rd along Havana to smoothly accomodate the traffic. Each of the above mentioned cross streets are presently low volume arterials and would not represent a signifi, ant intrusion in`.o the traffic flow with coordinated signalization along the Havana corridor. Public S rrvi -es All public services would be impacted to the extent of the ultimate number of houses, lineal feet of roads, sewer and water, etc. but no differently than any other similiar development or grouping of smaller developments. With the implementation of the proposed arterial, negative impacts on some public services will be eliminated including improved access for fire and safety equipment, possible development of community open space within the dedicated open areas, and improved tax base for the general revenues of Spokane County. Utilities All utilities within proposed project area would be provided by the city of Spokane after consideration by the Boundary Review Board. - 13 - PE • 1413.84 ADDENDUM October 2, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 LEAD AGENCY RECOMMENDATION: The County Planning Department confirms its August 23, 1984 recommendation for APPROVAL of the 14.5 acre Proposal persuant the recommended Conditions -of- Approval as listed in the Aug. 23, 1984 Staff Report and recommend the below condit- ions be added if approval is granted. NOTE - - The sponsor has requeste.d that the Hearing Examiner Committee make a decision on the Proposal. But, should the Committee have further concerns regarding the pit site rehabilitation - - -the Sponsor is requesting the decision be made in two parts: Area "A" = the MFS lots north of 14th Avenue Area "B" = the R -2 lots south of 14th Avenue. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: County Planning Department 1. That the "Conceptual Plan- Inland Pit Rehabilitation" is not being approved or any assurances given. Further Subdivision and Zone Change applications will be required for any such approvals for the remainder of the 116 acres. 2. That the Final Plat Dedication shall include: "No footings & found- ation shall be constructed within Block 1 until a Certified Pit Rehabilitation Plan has been submitted to Spokane County Engineer and County Planning Director for there review for completeness and proper certification by a qualified and Wash. State licenced professional engineer and as conditioned with approval of PE- 1473 -84." 3. That the sponsor or future applicant shall be required to rehab- ilitate portions of the north and adjacent pit prior to construction of footings & foundations for Lots 1 thru 5 of Block 1 as follows: Lots 1, 2, and 3 requires Quandrant =4 of the Pit` be rehabili- tated prior to said construction /development. Lots 4 and 5 requires Quadrant 11 3 of the Pit* be rehabilitated prior to said construction /development. = as shown on the "Conceptual Plan- Inland Pit Rehabilitation" received date Sept. 26, 1984 - 14 - ADDENDUM October 2, 1984 ei off CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: County Planning Department (cont'd) - 15 - PE- 1473 -84 The above Pit Rehabilitation Plan shall provide a 2:1 slope as proposed by the sponsor or as close as is possible, shall include preventions of r soil erosion, shall include seeding, planting or landscaping of the reshaped slopes, and shall include any necessary safety features warrented for safety of the public. It is recommended that the sponsor /applicant contact Washington State Department of Natural Resources and the local Soil Conservat- ion Service prior to the preparations of said plan. 5. The above Pit Rehabilitation Plan shall be the responsibility of the sponsor /applicant and said Plan is to be prepared by a Washington State Licenced Professional Engineer having expertise in such improvements for rehabilitating a pit. Said Plan is to be "certified' by said licenced Engineer. The certification shall address stability and compaction of the soil, soil erosion, ground cover, and soil characteristic regarding support and stability for any footings & foundations of adjacent multi - family structures. 6. Spokane County may request other agencies of expertise to provide a courtesy review and comment on the above Pit Rehabilitation Plan prior to granting permission to proceeding with any construction of said footings & foundations. 7. The safety fence condition shall still apply for any areas of the pit that has not been reshaped to a 2:1 slope, as approved by the County Planning Department. Bonding of fencing will not be allowed - -- the fence(s) shall be constructed and in place prior to issuing the Final Inspection or Occupancy Permit for any dwelling in the Proposal (be it duplex or apartment). • ADDENDUM October 2, 1984 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) City of Spokane Utilities Department - 16 - PE- 1473 -84 8. That prior to filing the Final Plat, the sponsor shall provide Spokane County Planning Department with written approval of road plans and profiles as prepared by the sponsor and in- dicating approval by City of Spokane Utility Department. The plans will be for curbs. Paving and sidewalks along Havana Street for the frontage of the ,ro.osal onl and for the .ro'ect's half of Havana. 9. That the sponsor shall cause the County and City road plans and profiles to be coordinated so that each road system elevation match to one another. RECEIVED NO. OCT 3 0 1984 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNT POKANE COUNTY ENGINEER WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY ) SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ) PE- 1473 -84, WILDWOOD TERRACE ) NQTICE OF ZE- 88 -84, AGRICULTURAL TO R -2 AND ) PI)BLIC HEARING MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN ) SPONSOR: WALLACE CONSTRUCTION CO. ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that John M. O'Brien and Rile L. Pickett, individually, have filed Notices of Appeal of the action by the Hearing Examiner Committee to approve, with conditions, the above captioned preliminary subdivision and zone reclassification. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will conduct a public hearing at 9:00 A.M., FRIDAY - NOVEMBER /& 1984/at its office in the Spokane County Courthouse, West'1116'Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260 -0100 to consider Preliminary Subdivision and Zone Reclassification of property generally Located east and adjacent the Spokane City limits between the County roads of 13th Avenue, Lloyd Road, 16th Avenue and Havana Road, all being approximately 1,500 feet west of Carnahan Road. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at this hearing and present testimony in support of or in opposition to the above mentioned preliminary subdivision and zone reclassi- fication. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 16 day of October, 1984. PUBLISH: SPOKANE VALLEY HERALD October 24, 1984 SPOKESMAN REVIEW October 24, 1984 WILLIAM E. DONAHUE CLERK OF TH$ BOARD BY :.' ��/�i/�.L' ; �/ r" i r QS MONTAGUE, DEP f fr ire (Please Ma) ddress: Fy.322 12 7,/ Ave ..:e Phone: 3139-9/8 & earing Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed Title: Z 04/ a C h a. p g t win/ e Preliminary Subdivision Number: Pe- / 4 73 -ay Zone Reclassification Number: ,Z 2 - AA5 — 8 Y Date of Hearing Examiner Committee Action: Dpi - 2 :ignaturc: y .earing Date: Appeal Fe- - $75.00 ri signature of Authorized Representative: ddress: T 93 22 /2 'Aix ve R EC,EfVED . O8 1984 . thel icdo Mibhi &sCkf - 5 /MV Zip Code: 772 /2 Business Phone: 4'SC '2 4 9,,S n Terrace RECEIVED OCT 2 5 1984 _ sgiont COUNTY ENGINEER OUR REASONS FOR' PEAL nc amp a- t/ wit» g or+rov'nchng neIgM5orhoacr, Non- connorming the Zon)9 and akta• spit zof►nc. /n l#epe r for Nc/ilions prop er density for the Sine. ?hem afore and fa u /ty -TA-Pepin Qtion pr es entec4 A/o fNVitoNNWAITPL GNec,k[1st PIED OFFICE USE ONLY :opies to: Planning_ 2. Engineers 2 Environmental Health Norma Smith 'ee Received: Check Cash 7c, d a Receipt Number 6,0/V ame:_p,,t £ fl:jit)' f (Please PIt) ddress: E y322 12 r'' A ve Phone: ,3 '/ /B t , tearing Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed Title: .ZONE CA A 9e. dwoo d 7c rra.ce Preliminary Subdivision Number: Pe. /'/ 73 - B 9 Zone Reclassification Number: ,Z 2. -/35 -$y Date of ;ignaturc: signature of 'address: .caring Date: Hearing Examiner Corrnittee Action: O f - 2 -89 Appeal Fen - $75.00 Authorized Representative: F 9322 a 'sin v e 'OCR REASONS FOR APPEAL ncomp -tab /t w/ 3v rr paneling neighhorhocvl, Non - coflorming witti #A zon)n5 and cotta-• sent zofln9. r /n mope r for r „praper density P r ern afore and fo- /y/o I N V i Le N»E W TA L OFFICE USE ONLY sap ies to: Planning 2 Engineers ' Norma Slilit'h see Received: Check Cash 75,66 RECE■VED 08 1984 c ida,i s f -S- /?SV Zip Code: 992/2 Business Phone: ySG ' 2 4 yr Y.„ Pziedat Environmental Health Receipt Number gee- r± o N CU"';CPS. for *he Sifen u /ty -Partin anon pi' es ente4 GNec.k List FILE ::ame • � J D 1 1tit rJ/ 4C4/ ease r nt) 6. 77 /et 2' s' X35- 7/y 7 .ddress: 1 ...:::e Phone: Title: Zo/vic CA/S-4t&, g //el>en/ .caring Date: K 52/ Appeal Fe- - $7.00 :fearing Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed Preliminary Subdivision Number: /c/73 - eP!r/ Zone Reclassification Number: Z C 7F. J'9' Date of Hearing Examiner Committee Action: /4/)/ c5' :ignature: 94r 4474.01 .ignature of Authorized Representative: ',ddress : 'OCR REASONS FOR APPEAL //YCrtair pit;/,[ A/ r`-`i/ ,.5 //v6 NO/ C041 & e,fr °, SPo r z o y ,. tie 7 OFFICE USE ONLY :ap ies to: Planning 2 Norma Smith ��' 'ce Received: Check Cash- 1 Receipt Number ‘U /d Engineers Z RECEIVED Today's Date /t//F UCT (. 1984 /! COUNTY COMMISSIONFR?ip Code: 1 Business Phone: SDK - <f_ in/r(.I)tveda 7E'nfi Environmental Health .ddress: Phone: Ze .caring Date: J e hA kli C A49/ Ems/ (Please PiTEt) �. ?7 /c 9-/ 5357 7/L 7 Appeal Fe•• - 475:00 :fearing Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed Preliminary Subdivision Number: Zone Reclassification Number: Z e 'err cit,/ • Date of Hearing Examiner Committee Action: :ignaturc:' ?fir « -c-e- _ .signature of Authorized Representative: \ddress: OUR REASO : :S FOR PEAL / p774 ' A/ /77/ SQo T 2_04/74./4 /Y8eD.E>z/ ei 4' 2 C OFFICE USE ONLY Engineers RECE;VED • • Today's Date /47�P5/ UUT uy 1984 COUNTY COMMISSION&?ip Code: ` ?eta 3 Title: Z emo< Ch1,9-v6.,c i/✓it wood TE2/nrc 2._ Business Phone: S/otoc. <f_ /'73- PS/ Sv,:°M' 'LJ /4/6 A/6/ C-9 & e, *e :opies to: Planning 2 Norma Smith 'ee Received: Check Cash Receipt Number ‘O /G' Environmental health (Please Pita) ddress: FV3 22 12 .,,:::e Phone: S39 vie (o :leering Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed Title: Zo,ya Chaff g , Wijdw Terra -c Preliminary Subdivision Number: Pee /'/ 73 ^e99 Zone Reclassification Number: Z e, -Re — Sy Date of :ignature: Hearing .O .=ignature of Authorized Representative: address: Appeal Fe- - $75.00 Examiner Committee Action: 00 - 2 - (91 1 yo 0 E 93 22 /2 Tt4 ye- 'OUR REASO : :S FOR APPEAL ompct- t / /t with ;3 vrrou'ndins I1e/Jihorhoocr, Non- rcflorming with le zonln9 and 5 - zofll m rho? e r for -tra f F/c- r. o/v /of) . rn pro per density for the ?Perm afore acne/ - faulty -snPor.rn ation pr es ente4 INVI R,ONNANTPL (Heck. [1st FILED OFFICE USE ONLY :ap ies to: Planning L Engineer: Norma SGlith 'ee Received: Check Cad .paring Date: °•ECE;VED OCT 0 1984 c rd i h - t-S Zip Code: 772/2 Business Phone: � .2 G ys RECEIVED OCT 1. 21984 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Environmental Health / Receipt Numberi:t 6,()/V C e/7 / vV1 (1/5,49i6 (Please Print) .ddress: 6. F? 7? •2/ S-<' COUNTY COMMISSIUNff$ZiP Code: (a 3 : : :c Phone: $ 35 ?/y 7 Business Phone: 5 i -z.•f :fearing Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed Title: 2d/✓,4 Cf/244 /6: Preliminary Subdivision Number: / 7 3 — F Zone Reclassification Number: Z e PcF' J? / . igna �ti� old .signature of Authorized Representative: \ddress: Appeal Fe- - $75.00 RECEIVED Today's Date l� - 3- U U I (;1 1984 NiC� 7 V' RECEIVED Date of Hearing Examiner Committee Action: /�/ )/ j l OCT 1 6 1984 Cure: �t 2li/ O SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER OUR REASONS FOR APPEAL //VC -0144 C'#71 A / :tW 3 /h' N•6" /C." & e / 'n) 5 c' T Zo/c /• tiL /YG'•Pl> :op ies to: Planning 2 Norma Smith 'cc Received: Check .caring Date: OFFICE USE ONLY Engineers Cash 2 /ifs'- `y0% /P72.„i. Environmental Health Receipt Number &C. G y Appeal Fe•• - $7.00 ' •ame: � Dlfi✓ vo C/Ae RECEIVED I •• Today's Date // /c y (Please Print) pC I 0 j 19114 .ddress: e. 77 / 1 2-/ S-i COUNTY COMMISSIONERSZIP Code: ) ?) 3 :e Phone: 5 t /y 7 Business Phone: Tstfri f :fearing Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed Title: 7 (qv, Cf/t42i &,c N, oWe46 7 E4° 47%7cr Preliminary Subdivision Number: /cj'7 3 - Zone Reclassification Number: .0 Date of Hearing Examiner Committee Action: /Q/)/ a7 :ignaturc: 9t-i O5f : al` .signature of Authorized Representative: \ddress: OUR REASONS FOR APPEAL / /NC i-2.4 ( ft' k' Th' it( N6/ & e,4-d) 5e T 2 v iv, tiL .caring Date: C OFFICE USE ONLY :opies to: Planning_ 2 _ Engineers 2- Environmental Health orma Smith �� •ce Received: Check Cosh c�' Receipt Number --0/C!) m ,a :ame: R / 1e / r / (Please Print) .ddress : � y3 2 2 12 r't v e Phone: 3 9/P 4. Business :fearing Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed Title: z c N e. Zone Reclassification Number: Date of Hearing Examiner Committee Action: :ignaturc: signature of Authorized Representative: E 932 lzT ve ',ddress : :op ies to: Planning_ 2 .oaring Date: Appeal Fe- - $75.00 RrCE■VED OCT 08 1984 c nt�;eo► a �,�,,a-t-.5 = /?8V Zip Code: 772 /2 Phone: ySC -2 40 9S ha-» rerra.ce_ Preliminary Subdivision Number: Pe Pit 7,3 -8f 1 Z e- -R5 -8y Dof -2 elY 'OCR REASO : :S FOR APPEAL ,Tncompo_t /b /t. tes svr roanel ng neigli.horhocd, Non- romPorrning with #e. zon,n and arg-a.• Spnf zohin r m mope r for f r a. glc- .►rpro ptr density for the Sife. ?rein afore and faulty .pn4)0r -yn a.tlon pi' es ente4 f NviR,oNMENTAI, GKecJc List FILED C o N C/17 1 .5 . OFFICE USE ONLY Engineers 2 — Environmental Health l Norma Smith 'ee Received: Check Cash 7s, 66 Receipt Nuirberft (i)/1/ .oaring Date: Appeal Fc•• - $75.00 R « (Please Print) .:dress 9322 I2 v e. Phone: 3 7/5 (o :fearing Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed Title: Z o A/ e. rha-/sge v✓i%dwoo c/ rerra.ce- Preliminary Subdivision Number: PQ I y 7,3 -ay Zone Reclassification Number: z Q. -85 -8' Date of Hea Committee Action: Dot - 2 - RV : igna tur c : 'ki( Toe - c+ .signature of Authorized Representative: 7,2, \ddress: 'OUR REASO : :S FOR APPEAL E 93 /2 7 ' ' /? ve ReCE∎VED OCT 0 8 1984 th rd bu t-S = /9B9 Zip Code: 772 /2 Business Phone: 4/56-2 (o .Jncompc_t7 /t with s vr+ro tin c/ ng I1eigtiihorhoacl, !Yon- comPorming with t-he zoning and atta• 5 r. pnt 7.0)11119. —W G r - for f r, d c F,c- c N c /i f % ohs I mproper density for the Site. f ret:R atvre and faulty .snf ation pp es ente4 No INVIR,oNmeAtrAL CHec.k List Fate) OFFICE USE ONLY :opies to: Planning_ 2 _ Engineers - Z Environmental Health 1 Norma Smith 'ee Received: Check Cash 7c, 6 6 Receipt Number(= (OW SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Spokane County Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee on October 2, 1984 and the members of the Committee present being Jerry Williams, Chairperson, Ron McVicker and Rich Skalstad. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Wallace Construction, Inc. is requesting approval of a preliminary plat of PE- 1473 -84, Wildwood Terrace, and Zone Reclassification, ZE- 88 -84, from Agricultural to R -2 and Multiple Family Suburban for subdivision of 14.5 acres of "Woodland Terrace" into 27 lots for 22 divided duplexes and 5 multiple - family structure, and there being present, the following applicant or representative: JOHN KONEN & GEORGE THOMPSON C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1 That the 14.5 acre proposal is part of 116 acres optioned by the sponsor which includes as abandoned gravel pit adjacent and north of the 14.5 acre proposal. 2. The 14.5 acre proposal is part of an existing recorded Final Plat called "Woodland Terrace" with existing dedicated County roads and 50 foot wide lots all zoned Agricultural. 3. That the 14.5 acre proposal is east and adjacent the City of Spokane with City zoning for single family dwellings and all City land being in Final Plat of "Tudor Heights" with dedicatd roads and 50 foot lots. 4. That the surrounding property of the 14.5 acre proposal is either vacant (north and east) or sparsely developed lots with few single family dwellings (south and west). 5. That the proposal and the remainder of the 116 acres with the abandoned gravel pit is undeveloped and vacant land. 6. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as URBAN for "city- like" development. 7. That the area retains a "Semi - Rural" character due to the lack of improvment on the existing dedicated streets and lack of dwellings on the existing 50 foot lots . October 2, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 Findings & Order WILDWOOD TERRACE 8. That the proposal was considered at the August 23, 1984 Hearing Examiner Committee public hearing, after which the hearing was continued to October 2, 1984 to allow time for additional information to be provided to the Hearing Examiner Committee regarding: a. potential land -use of the remainder of the 116 acres optioned by the sponsor, b. rehabilitation of the existing abandoned gravel pit and related mining regulations, c. the pit slopes and related safety, d. traffic generated by the proposal and improvements to Havana Street 9. That, at the August 23, 1984 Hearing, the owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of this proposal, as change in existing lifestyle; incompatible land -uses; issues regarding rehabilitation and operation of the gravel pit; existence of improper fencing; operation of a pit within 1,000 feet of residential development; traffic; fire protection; "foot -in- the - door" for other development; vacation of roads; who pays for cost of improvements; value of the new houses and vacation process for dedicated roads. One adjacent owner at the October 2nd continued Hearing again expressed opposition and concerns in regard to increased traffic, existing safety problems of the abandoned pit, total pit rehabilitation, that 14.5 acre proposal represents a "piece- meal" development of the 116 acre property, that approving the 14.5 acre proposal represents the beginning of a "very large" development, that such development represents a change to the neighborhood "Semi- Rural" lifestyle, that the Comprehensive Plan should not be Urban pursuant to past citizen participation desires and improvements to the existing dedicated roads. 10. That the information presented in the August 23, 1984 STAFF REPORT and the October 2, 1984 ADDENDUM was considered. 11. That "overall safety" of the proposal was considered on this preliminary plat decision. 12. Landfill and the pit rehabilitation will be accomplished as the proposal develops and safety fences are also provided for. 13. That the phased pit rehabilitation will attempt to accomplish a 2:1 grade for the reshaped pit slopes and the 2:1 is not intended to be an inflexible grade. The finished grade 2:1 or steeper and those pit slopes not reshaped will all be considered for public safety provisions such as fences, as conditioned. 14. Havana Road in the City will be improved as conditioned. -2- October 2, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 Findings & Order WILDWOOD TERRACE 15. That the proposal is within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary and will be served by the City of Spokane Public Sewer. 16. That the greater multi - family density north of 14th Avenue adjacent to the abandoned pit is justified due to: a. the public City sewer and water, b. the "Urban" category of the Comprehensive Plan, c. the special "screening, height, and placement" condition of aproval regarding the apartments, d. the 14.5 acre proposal represents an initial development of the 116 acres with enough density to support rehabilitation of,the existing and abandoned gravel pit. 17. That the 14.5 acre proposal is a reasonable use of the land and provides for URBAN "fill -in" that complies with the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan decision guidelines for development and compatible land uses. 18. That the abandoned pit rehabilitation plan does not include proposals for a lake which eliminates concerns regarding safety and health. 19. That the numerous County, City of Spokane and State agencies /departments (including Washington State Department of Natural Resources - DNR) all indicate no problem with the 14.5 acre proposal or pit rehabilitation as conditioned. 20. That the "Conceptual Plan" is not being approved and was used to evaluate the potential adjacent land -use compatibility of future development and environmental impacts. 21. That the 14.5 acre proposal can develop independently of the remainder of the 116 acres and no mitigating measure is necessary with the 14.5 acre proposal. 22. That the remainder of the 116 acres will require additional application(s) and environmental reviews by appropriate agencies /departments in the future when subdivision and /or zone changes are requested to develop this land. 23. That the entire optioned ownership does not need to be made part of the preliminary plat. 24. That the provisions of RCW 43.21c (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 25. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of Agenda Item have been fulfilled. - 3 October 2, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 Findings & Order WILDWOOD TERRACE 26. That the Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposal as conditioned is not detrimental to the general purpose or otherwise harmful to the public health, safety and welfare. 27. That the 14.5 acre proposal as conditioned is an excellent proposed land -use and will benefit the community when developed, with sewer, water, fire hydrants, curbs, paving, sidewalks, dwelling units and initial pit rehabilitation and safety fences. D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS DECISION Those conditions as listed in the August 23, 1984 STAFF REPORT and the October 2, 1984 ADDENDUM to the Staff Report of August 23, 1984. E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Preliminary Plat PE- 1473 -84, Wildwood Terrace, and Zone Reclassification ZE -88 -84 from Agricultural to R -2 and MFS is hereby APPROVED to September 1, 1987. Motion by: Rich Skalstad Seconded by: Ron McVicker Jerry Williams - Aye Ron McVicker - Aye Rich Skalstad - Aye ATTEST: JOHN NUNNERY Spokane County Subdivision Administrator By: Date: rei HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE INDINGS, ORDER AND VOTE. - 4 - ,� Gary Kennaly . Engineer's Off INTEROFFICE MAIL SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: John Nunnery, Subdivision Administrator C DATE: October 9, 1984 Sponsor: 535 -7619 Wallace Construction Co. E. 518 High Drive Spokane, WA 99203 IPCJaimu L CA KS PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 RECEIVED OCT 10 1984 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SUBJECT: Hearing Examiner Committee Action - October 2, 1984 On October 2, 1984, the Hearing Examiner Committee met at 9:00 a.m. to consider a continuation of a preliminary plat and zone reclassification. If not appealed, this decision is final ten (10) days after Findings and Order have been signed. Findings and Order were signed October 8, 1984. The Hearing Examiner Committee Board members were: Jerry Williams, Chairperson, Ron McVicker and Rich Skalstad. I PE- 1473 -84, WILDW00D TERRACE ZE- 88 -84, Agricultural to R -2 and Multiple Family Suburban Surveyor /Engineer: 534 -5272 J. Ronald Dunsmore S. 104 Freya Spokane, WA 99203 Location: The proposal is located east and adjacent the Spokane City limits between the County roads of 13th Avenue, Lloyd Road, 16th Avenue and Havana Road, all being approximately 1,500 feet west of Carnahan Road. Comprehensive Plan: URBAN, within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. Proposal: The sponsor is requesting to replat 14.5 acres of "WOODLAND TERRACE: into 27 lots for 22 duplexes and 5 multiple family structure and change the existing Agricultural Suburban to R -2 and M.F.S. City of Spokane sewer and water is also proposed to serve these lots. The duplex lots are proposed for "divided duplexes" to allow separate ownership of each half of the duplex and the lot. Action: Unanimously APPROVED to September 1, 1987, with conditions to rehabilitate port the existing and adjacent Gravel Pit. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA OCTOBER 11, 1984 9:00 a.m. I. STAFF REPORTS II. COMMITTEE REPORTS III. COMMISSION CONCERNS )rn h PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0) BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 727 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456.2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 TELEPHONE NO: 456 -2205 Thursday, October 11, 1984 Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor N. 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, WA 10:00 a.m. (Or as soon as possible thereafter) IV. PUBLIC HEARING Proposed Amendment to the Future Land Use Plan Map of the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan CPA 26 -82, CPA 31 -83, CPA 33 -84 11:00 a.m. (Or as soon as possible thereafter) V. PUBLIC WORKSHOP Miscellaneous Modifications to the Proposed Zoning Code. 5P0M.NC COUNTY COURT MOUSE Honorable Board of County Commissioners Spokane County Courthouse Spokane, WA 99260 Gentlemen: At the regular meeting of the Spokane County Planning Commission on Thursday, September 13, 1984, at 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., in the Broadway Centre Building the enclosed action was taken and is recommended to the Board of County Commissioners. Members present: Chairperson Myers, Mrs. Carstens, Mrs. Tennican, and the Messrs. Kennedy, Skalstad, and Williams. Planning staff present: Hubbard, Fergen, Denton Winkle, Jaffray, and Sokolowski. County Utilities: Damon Taam. JEM:WDH:ks Sincerely, Official minutes and record of action taken by the Spokane County Planning Commission at their regular meeting held on September 13, 1984. Verbatim hearing on tape available in Planning Department. PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 Jane E. Myers, Chairperson September 28, 1984 Wallis D. Hubbard, Planning Director MINUTES OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1984 WHEREAS, The Spokane County Planning Commission did hold a public hearing September 13, 1984, to consider the testimony and requests of several applicants, objectors, and other interested parties concerning the below - referenced items of business, and WHEREAS, Cha- irperson Myers, Mrs. Tennican, Mrs. Carstens, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Williams, and Mr. Skalstad were in attendance and constituted a quorum. (Mr. Skalstad left the meeting at 10:00 a.m.; Mr. McVicker was absent.) WHEREAS, The Spokane County Planning Commission fully considered the testimony given, the environmental review, and all other evidence presented, recommends to the Board of County Commissioners the following: Minutes of July 1984 and August 1984 Planning Commission Meetings The minutes of the July 12, 1984, and the August 16, 1984, Planning Commission meetings were approved as mailed. I. STAFF REPORTS A. Waste -to- Energy Project Mr. Damon Taam of Spokane County Utilities Department reported that on August 21 the Board of County Commissioners signed a resolution in the matter of jointly employing a consultant, along with the City of Spokane and Spokane Regional Council, to assist in the program management of a waste -to- energy project. This firm must be a multi - disciplinary firm able to coordinate all the steps needed to have a waste -to- energy plan and able to accomplish construction, inspection, environmental impact statements, and final environmental impact state- ments for the waste -to- energy plan. The Board of County Commissioners appointed a selection advisory committee to hire the consultant. Mr. John Swanson, Director of Public Utilities for the City of Spokane and project manager for the waste -to- energy project, stated that the selection advisory committee is made up of a broad spectrum of people who are knowledgable on this subject; Gary Fergen (Doc Hansen, alternate) of the County Planning Department, a representative from the League of Women Voters, Damon Taam of the County Utilities Department, a representative from the City Council, the Environmental Programs Director, the Refuse Director, Claude Sappington from the Regional Office, and Mark Crooks from Olympia. The total cost for this waste -to- energy project is spectacular, and it will most likely be funded by revenue bonds. Other counties and states are watching our project. Mr. Hubbard questioned which communities would be participating in this project. Damon Taam stated that 11 municipalities so far are involved. Some communities, such as Deer Park, Cheney, Airway Heights, City of Spokane, and Rockford are still debating. Mr. Swanson stated that Washington Water Power is the purchaser of electricity. B. 1985 Budget Presentation Mr. Hubbard reported that the 1985 Planning Department Budget reflects the estimated actual services that have been provided this year projected for 1985. The organization chart for 1985 is as the Department is now operating. Line item expenditures for 1984 equal $587,000; for 1985 it is $681,000. The difference in budget total does not reflect new personnel, but does include cost of living raises and inflationary increases in operation and maintenance. The Planning Department has a request submitted to the Board of County Commissioners for the following new positions: 0A3 - $16,897 (figure includes benefits) - We currently have a person in the office fulfilling this function on a temporary basis, the Subdivision Secretary. Budget cuts two years ago forced the lay -off of this position. We could not hire a permanent person, but were allowed temporary help. P2 Zoning position - This position is needed to handle the work load of administering two zoning ordinances through the transition period to the new Zoning Code. The Planning Department is going to present the Zoning Ordinance to the Planning Commission in public hearing in November of this year. Two more positions requested relate to the fact that a major update is due for Comprehensive Plan. $11,500 in estimated expenditures is projected for the Planning Commission in 1985. The Department has asked for $13,000. In previous years we have asked for a carry -over of funds. That process is not available to us next year. The extra money would provide for the Planning Com- mission members to attend one of the area's conferencesin 1985. Mrs. Myers stated that she felt that Travel and Mileage line items were too low because of the upcoming Zoning Ordinance hearing and the many areas which the Planning Commission must view relating to detailed planning and the new zoning ordinance categories. Mr. Hubbard explained that the Department is not allowed to do anything different in 1985 than it has done in 1984. He cannot increase the Planning Commission's Travel and Mileage because he doesn't know if the Department will get the new staff people to accomplish the Compre- hensive Plan update. We must wait for a commitment from the Board of County Commissioners to the Comprehensive Plan update. Mr. Skalstad asked Mr. Hubbard about the work load for Zoning Code hearings and the time frame for Zoning Code approval. Mr. Hubbard stated that he plans to advertise a hearing for approval in November since there have been 18 workshops held for public input. Mr. Hubbard stated matter- of- factly that if the Zoning Ordinance becomes a big effort, the Planning Department will have to go to the Board for additional funds for mileage or compensation. - 2 - Mr. Kennedy suggested that it might be best to adopt the Zoning Ordinance in November rather than holding it up for minor changes and carrying adoption hearings over into 1985. - The Planning Commission decided to write a letter to the Board of County Commissioners regarding the inevitable expenses attached to the coming adoption of the Zoning Code. C. CPA -37 -84 West Plains South Mr. Fergen requested that the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment for this area of Medical Lake and I90 Interchange be placed on the November 15, 1984 Planning Commission hearing agenda. The Planning Commission was in agreement. Mrs. Myers commented that the Planning Commission and Planning Depart- ment staff have processed 11 proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments this year. Mr. Fergen offered that the Department was budgeted to do 4 amendments. II. COMMITTEE REPORTS There were no Committee Reports in the September 13, 1984, Planning Commission meeting. III. COMMISSION CONCERNS A. Hearing Examiner Committee Appointments Hearing Examiner Committee Appointments for October through December were made as follows: Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee - Ken Kennedy (Chairman) Rich Skalstad "." Lynn Tennican Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee - Jerry Williams (Chairman) Ron McVicker Kathy Carstens Alternate - Jane Myers B. Planning Commission Letter of Complaint on Signage Controls The Planning Commission asked that a letter be sent to Mr. Tom Davis, Zoning Investigator, in regard to signage controls. This letter was to address especially the three areas of Sprague, Division, and Trent with respect to regulations that are now being violated and is to be a complaint from the Planning Commission signed by Mrs. Myers, Chair- person. C. Notification of Planning Commission Meeting Attendance It was agreed upon by the Planning Commission that each member will. notify Karen Sokolowski, Recording Secretary, as to their attendance at the Planning Commission hearing. -3- IV. PUBLIC HEARING Proposed Amendment to the Spokane County Future Land Use Plan Map (CPA 26 -82 Spokane County Health District I, CPA 31 -83 Dishman Hills, CPA 33 -84 N.W. Ponderosa) Chairperson Myers announced that, due to a change in State regulations regarding advertising for proposed amendments, the Planning Commission would not be taking any action relative to the Proposed Amendment to the Spokane County Future Land Use Plan Map. However, the Planning Commission would take public input. Rory Denton Winkle, Planning Department staff member, reported that three Comprehensive Plan Amendments have been combined in this analysis because of their proximity to each other and the sharing of commonalities. Mrs. Denton Winkle then began to introduce each amendment separately. CPA- 26 -82: The County Health District is concerned about the large existing developed areas relative to adequate equipment accessability for public services. The Health District is asking that these developed areas be included in the Priority Sewer Service Area. A letter from Mr. Darrell Way of the Health District was read into the record. Mr. Kennedy was upset by the fact that the Health District representative was out of town and, thus, would not be able to give personal input or answer questions. Mr. Kennedy felt it critically important that someone be able to -tell the Planning Commission if this area could be sewered with- in 5 years, pointing out that changing the PSSA line around does not protect the aquifer. Mr. Jaffray offered that the original request from the Health District lay in their concern about existing high density development toward the east side of the area. The initial request concerned the developed area in the Rural category. Mrs. Myers requested that the Planning Staff take the Planning Commission on a - tour so that they might view these development problems. Mrs. Tennican asked if there is some reason why areas of existing high density could not be sewered without a change in the PSSA. Without the Health District representative to answer questions, Chairperson Myers suggested the hearing go on to review the second proposed Comprehen- sive Plan amendment. CPA- 31 -83: The Dishman Hills Natural Area Association is asking that the Priority Sewer Service Area and the Urban Impact Area boundaries be adjusted as they feel there exists incompatibility between the Comprehensive Plan Map and the Natural Area. Mr. Larry Thieman testified that the Citizens Coordinating Committee recommended that this area retain rural status and that the public unanimously supported a Rural designation for the area. He stated that the change to the Urban category seemed to accomodate a developer's proposal with the boundaries closely following the development boundaries. Should not the burden of proof be placed on those who wish the Rural designation changed? Mr. Thieman pointed out that the land could be subdivided more than 12 times without changing its Rural status. He submitted that residential -4- subdivision activity has essentially stopped and that there is an over supply of available units. Greater density could always be considered later if the need arises. In referring to the general welfare, Mr. Thieman suggested that the general welfare means more than increased tax dollars. Residential developments use many tax dollars for services needed. Are we ignoring environmental values? Mr. Thieman testified for preservation of the Dishman Hills Natural Area, describing them as a unique storehouse of plant and animal facilities needed for health, safety, and welfare of the general public. Mr. Tom Rogers testified as Vice President of the Dishman Hills Natural Area Association ( DHNAA) that thousands of dollars have been donated for the natural area. High density development in the area near the corridor is one of the concerns of DHNAA. Mr. Rogers stated that he would like a designation in the Comprehensive Plan that provides for no development as, at present, there is no protection at all against development. Should not the absence of sewer connection in the area be a deterrent from high density development there? The Urban density would seriously threaten the Dishman Hills Natural Area. The Dishman Hills are used. Schools, having difficulty getting transportation for field trips, use this area as it is close. Mrs. Tennican testified that, at a previous hearing of the Planning Commission, the corridor was discussed. Its width was carefully considered by the Planning Commission at that time. The Comprehensive Plan recognized the fauna as being unique in number and type, and the corridor as being essen- tial for interaction between the Dishman Hills and the Krell Peak area. Increased densities bring domestic animals, dogs that range rather widely. If it is a problem for the DHNAA animals to move between the two areas, it becomes really unusable as a corridor even if it is preserved. Mr. Rogers contributed that dogs, motorcycles, and development are all problems to the Dishman Hills Natural Area. One public citizen testified that he felt that people should consider the feelings of the property owners in the corridor. Mr. Frank Tailor stated that at one time all that land was farmed, and there were homes there. Since then the homes were burned and timber grew in the area. He felt it was selfish for people to ask property owners not to develop their property. CPA 33 -84: The applicant proposes a change in this Northwest Ponderosa 40 -acre parcel from the Semi -Rural category to the Suburban category, stating that it would then be compatible with higher density parcels in the sur- rounding area. This applicant also proposes, if necessary, that an adjoining 40 acre parcel of his in the Suburban category be changed to Semi -Rural to maintain a balance between the categories. The PSSA and the Urban Impact Area boundaries would be adjusted. Mr. Jerry Neal, Attorney, represented Mr. Lloyd Phillips and his wife, the applicants. Mr. Neal stated that he and his clients believe that a change to Suburban would be a natural transition from Urban to the next developed Rural category. Changing the category thusly would mean that this area would be included within the PSSA boundary with a 5 -acre density. Through - 5 • a private discussion with Mr. Sam Angove of the Parks Department, Neal testified that he determined that it would not threaten the County parks system. The land has been pastured, but is not prime agricultural land, Mr. Neal stated that this area is removed from the Dishman Hills Natural Area. Mrs. Myers continued this hearing to the October 11, 1984, Planning Commission meeting. V. ZONING CODE WORKSHOP' A zoning code workshop was held on "Miscellaneous Modifications." Details are on record at the Planning Department. DATED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984. By: Karen Sokolowski, Recording Secretary For: Jane E. Myers, Chairperson Spokane County Planning Commission -6 Wallis D. ubb'r Planning Director 1,0.lc4coo0 4 re c PE 147 i ao- osex.. e:, ts J zc+ ;v &s {. ain,At. Kona 6. 3 (:)( uc P . Sp0 k.AvoG a Uiscussio- -, 0-c co,, s;dc2Ji -7; ors cY A2 -czyen a 7 /2't - -. • App rcric 5 yRS Acla . 20-t1.4h rtin& Jie f"o eesr /y, L. 5 Cannnot raeViAb Pit _.G{IAc.e.vtA 1 - C R /w. _ c. D. UD kAttati AN oI, OCI . 2 )4gly % l -- 5 /0 pc /my No f 6a ,cc/i/ evA /e cve/z!/u/hene bof npv nes - pi,: S/ /e. / /• "/ __ _ J /77e _ doe5 63°-" . =. fo'tetQ c{alr.ee, °1 s eU, _6ein0/z4I)y 2; / _ 5 /c�Lr Gvi // 0 /2oVIis / flit/ ,4cC .spy6k Atka 0 Sct4}ee. o51" O -c- faek Z4 / — 00 lVto-uui p c k c was. Pr2Si AS€ el �.2ti4h A??rc nd*' .A I00 9 . 45 of rn1 +o 5� Woe-et .. PRA" ll " be T e td E'o \ n eery - C ec ?exi,k o 1 �cn. a,-, of _ CArt / - 7 ,sire- 5 - k A 1 w l ( clef al t N ycl Ve- (-;,. e_ RetA-1,91( a do piza; e .�f ) . e, L, 2c etit '��e uy ( #, pie. to; 4( -ze AQuestritel to a. 9 2 'E-e /c. c -xtf" . F o "PI( t jC 5 ec- 1_ 2 , Ceo5 - Sections n ccae,ee Poep ( �i� ..,. 4a4 /keg v- &550& d€ 5 AL21ca. ' Photo 5_. 3- • 1 V eAR, e 5 a_ ` rit a yipson _ o 1'e*{ meat- Vrwn Len,)`, 5 D I t G( Ca_ N el ct h boa.) 8� (Le — 5r,.ppaci4ioe. o-f olwe4o ma4. . 3 , Gcerp -c a ` vrrvr an z so h/ jti it do - (a) 'Disc Liss 4�o meeci • e . -. (k) E 1( 3 c2 n_y I _ f V;* ��,6 visa rc/w� 69n -Pr Ua4t U e2 s y . 09 Ott) rAkh Piceke TM ( U zi — C a) e- ,.i- O „ 444,0 fri;b4 ??6, is 6 do-a4./ cna.fr einkvalereei (&) © 5 o ok45 , - AAL- ) /d. ?T) .5e\swi � 1 i tA s -x, ) R gyt,Q,c o ��CA tM;r a e 61e Re` .. t=it tue, r• rR PSS c ?rob Cti . L 0-t Zo(noub 6-C ska OFFIat OF COUNTY ENGINs.2R SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date September 28 84 ,19 Inter- office Communication Spokane County Subdivision Administrator To From Spokane County Engineer Subject PE 1473 -84 Wildwood Terrace As proposed, the plat of Wildwood Terrace would, at full occupancy, generate approximately l 030 Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends. This is approximately the same volume of traffic which would be expected from a development of 102 single family residences. The roadway' improvements which have been specified for 14th, 15th and 16th Avenues and Lloyd and Morrill Streets will adequately accommodate traffic within the develop- ment. The existing County Road System will accommodate the traffic which would be generated by the proposed plat. Any improvements to Havana Street required by the City of Spokane will also enhance traffic movement into the City Street System. Conceptual Plan - Inland Pit Rehabilitation The conceptual plan for optimum development of the area projects a total of 772 dwelling units. At this density, a total of.5 132_Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends can be anticipated. In addition to access streets which will serve the building sites and lots, it will also be necessary to provide an arterial roadway in order to facilitate traffic flows to and from the development. The arterial street depicted in the conceptual plan could accommodate projected traffic volumes if it were constructed to an appropriate standard. A similar alignment had been considered by the County a number of years ago. It should be noted that a more detailed analysis of the site and adjoining lands will be necessary before a final alignment is determined. It will also be necessary to conduct additional detailed studies relative to traf- fic flows and volumes, drainage and stormwater disposal before final development plans and densities can be determined [i.e. the area designated as being single family (SF) along the easterly side of the property is affected by a designated Flood Hazard Zone]. This could substantially impact density, design, street location, etc. Pit Reclamation The applicant should be required to submit a Reclamation Plan for review and approval by appropriate agencies. This plan should be prepared by a Licensed Professional Engineer having expertise in the area of quarry and pit reclamation. A licensed professional engineer should certify upon completion of reclamation that the reclamation was done in accordance with the approved plan. BMc /set Pit Reclamation BMc /set OFFI 1 E OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Inter - office Communication Spokane County Subdivision Administrator To Conceptual Plan — Inland Pit Rehabilitation Date September 28 19 84 Spokane County Engineer From Subject PE 1473 -84 Wildwood Terrace As proposed, the plat of Wildwood Terrace would, at full occupancy, generate approximately 1,030 Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends. This is approximately the same volume of traffic which would be expected from a development of 102 single family residences. The roadway improvements which have been specified for 14th, 15th and 16th Avenues and Lloyd and Morrill Streets will adequately accommodate traffic within the develop- ment. The existing County Road System will accommodate the traffic which would be generated by the proposed plat. Any improvements to Havana Street required by the City of Spokane will also enhance traffic movement into the City Street System. The conceptual plan for optimum development of the area projects a total of 772 dwelling units. At this density, a total of 5,132 Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends can be anticipated. In addition to access streets which will serve the building sites and lots, it will also be necessary to provide an arterial roadway in order to facilitate traffic flows tc and from the development. The arterial street depicted in the conceptual plan could accommodate projected traffic volumes if it were constructed to an appropriate standard. A similar alignment had been considered by the County a number of years ago. It should be noted that a more detailed analysis of the site and adjoining lands will be necessary before a final alignment is determined. It will also be necessary to conduct additional detailed studies relative to traf- fic flows and volumes, drainage and stormwater disposal before final development plans and densities can be determined [i.e. the area designated as being single family (SF) along the easterly side of the property is affected by a designated Flood Hazard Zone'. This could substantially impact density, design, street location, etc. The applicant should be required to submit a Reclamation Plan for review and approval by appropriate agencies. This plan should he prepared by a Licensed Professional Engineer having expertise in the area of quarry and pit reclamation. A licensed professional engineer should certify upon completion of reclamation that the reclamation was done in accordance with the approved plan. Traccic- Co uNTS \kAVaro - 3100) FS n' + Cpazi 4,nc- N- 3S0 E - 2So6 5 - z1OO w -Z40o CAR &A4\AAJ 1484 - 1 19 %3- 1 19$2- 3 1981 - l980 - Ni \IiRI\IIVL 10 CONf?I_I'TUAL PLAN 01 IIft INLAND I'll RCIIAHILIIATIUN & P.E. 1.473 -84 The following discussion is a follow -up to the specific proposal of P.C. 1473 -84. At the original hearing of August 23, 1984 of P.C. 1473 -84, several questions were brought up by the Hearing Examiner Committee regarding the overall development proposal of the clients ownership. Attached is a conceptual plan addressing several questions raised at the hearing including pit safety, residential development, traffic and fire protection. The status of the preliminary request for twenty -two (22) duplex units and one hundred twenty five (125) multi family units has not changed. the ut:t.acled conceptual plan'identi`ies a potential development pattern of single family, R2 and multi. - family suburban uses totalling seven hundred seventy two (772) dwelling units with a net density of 6.7 dwelling units per gross a•re the overall '''nsity is well within the Comprehensive Plan guidelines for this Urban Category Area. Within the concept is a proposed arterial aligned with IJavanna and continuing south toward Glenrose Road. the nrult:i- family and R2 area:; have. been laid out adjacent to this intense traffic pattern. the single family areas are in locations served by the proposed arterial but not directly abutting it. WiLhin the proposed conceptual plan, traffic will be generated to the extent of 6000 ADT focusing on Havanna and its access to employment and shopping facilities within the Spokane Valley and downtown areas via Interstate 90. The arterial would provide not only exceptional access for traffic, but also fire and emergency vehicles from the existing facilities in the valley floor to the upper levels or the project area. 11, also would release the sub- stantial burden to Prat, 12th Avenue and other existing city streets to the west. Wallace Construction Inc. understands the need for this connection if the attached conceptual plan becomes a reality. the abandoned pit site has been evaluated for potential rehabilitation. Attached are cross sections of the proposed pit in sections A -A, 11-13 and I: -C. No specific plan has been developed although the following criteria is acceptable to Wallace Construction Inc. the shaded areas on the plan will be slope of 2:1 (or flatter) by field engineering. If this slope cannot be attained, that is if the slopes are greater (steeper) than 2:1, thus Spokane County Engineers and other appropriate agency reviews and approvals will he sought. the pit. has been segmented off into four (4) quadrant.s. Wallace Construction Inc. will agree to rehabilitate each quadrant of the pit to the above mentioned criteria prior Lo requesting building permit within each quadrant for development north of 14th Avenue. Additionally, fencing of the balance of the pit site will be provided with initial rehabilitation Lo eliminate all - public access. Thus the proposal I.Irrt is before the Planning Commis:; ion, when and if constructed, will require suhsLantial improvements in quadrants 3 and 4. The only area er the pit. site which wi.l.l not be reclaimed and rehabilitated by Wallace tcn:.truction Inc. is that area which lied adjacent to 9th Avenue and navanna where existing construction and improvements along with lack of no-niur::ip west of Ilavanr not allow such, PE -1473 -84 RECEIVED SEP 27 1984 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT S- Narrative hnW 2 A lake is not a specific part of the proposed rehabilitation of this )it site. Whatever ultimate use is made within Lhe shaded dedicated open space areas will be submitted for further review and approval to all necessary regulatory agencies at such time as it is determined necc.,,,,r ry . I'.f_ 1473 -f14 n be the first phase of an ultimate development program however, i.L.is who.lely located within areas not significantly impacted by the pit site rehabilitation. Note however, that Wallace Construction Inc_. has acknowledged pit improvements within quadrants 3 and 4 anyway. the development lying south of 14th Avenue is physically separate from the balance by 14th Avenue, thus Wallace - Construction Inc. requests tlrat the project as a whole be approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee but that it be reviewed and considered as two separate parts. That multi- family suburban area lying north of 14th Avenue being designated NS area 'A' and that lying south of 14th Avenue, R -2, being designated as area '11'. Should testimony and concerns for the pit site rehabilitation become a questioned factor in the decision process, Wallace Construction I)ne. would request that area 'A' and 'B' he considered on their separate merit. P E - 1473 -84 P E - 141 3 -84 ft ec ( , fr supplemental Expanded Enivornmenta1 Sep 2� Checklist P $pQ� 198 Pit Site Rehabilitation Wildwood Terrace The following data is the result of a conceptual plan to rehabilitate the Inland Asphalt Pit site located at 14th and Havana. The primary considerations addressed within this expanded check list are the physical features of the pit site itself and the impacts of its rehabilitation including surrounding land uses. The basis for these comments is the possible development of the Inland site pursuant to a conceptual plan attached. No specific plans exist for the phased development of this site. Environmental Impacts Earth The sloping of the pit site to a field engineered minimum slope of 2:1 will reduce substantially most of the existing potential dangers existing within the pit site. Ownerships to the west and existing housing will negate the potential for reduction of slopes in the vicinity of the western face of the pit. Fencing will be provided along this face if access permits. Fencing will be placed around all accesses to the pit (with the possible exception of the portion mentioned above) as the first phase is developed within quadrant #4. Each quadrant will be sloped to 2:1 or flatter unless specific engineering proposals are approved by the Spokane County Engineer and other regulatory agencies. Water No specific plans have been developed that would adversely impact surface or ground waters. Land Use The attached conceptual plan identifies a potential development pattern impacted by not only the pit rehabilitation but also the proposed arterial to replace the inadequate Carnahan alignment. Note that previous zone change requests in the vicinity of the Mining Zone at Carnahan and 8th avenue have included a mix of not only single family but also multifamily. This is a valid and accepted use not only to economically justify the expense of the pit site rehabilitation but a.ic) to create a buffer from this previous mining activity and proposed arterial extension of Havana towards Glenrose Road. In the areas adjacent to the proposed arterial but not significantly impacted by the previous mining activities R2 development has been proposed for transition to single family. These uses all fit within the concepts outlined for fill -in development within the Urban Catergory of the recently adopted Spokane County Comprehensive Plan. If devlopment of the concept should occur after further review by the Spokane County Planning Commission and staff, it would represent transition from a disadvantaged area to the adjacent ownerships. Land use within the conceptual plan would be made compatible via carefully developed site specific plans, reviewed by staff and Planning Commission to ensure proper transition and neighborhood compatibility. Transportation The ultimate development of the conceptual plan would create 6000 ADT. However, beyond the present proposal before the hearing examiner committee, it would be necessary for the implementation of the proposed arterial connecting at 8th and Havana. This arterial access with I -90 and shopping and employment centers will focus 80 to 95 percent of the traffic north on Havana and not impact the residential streets to the west. Existing I -90 interchanges are in place for accepting this traffic loading. However, signalization will be required at 8th, 4th and 3rd along Havana to smoothly accomodate the traffic. Each of the above mentioned cross streets are presently low volume arterials and would not represent a signifi -ant intrusion into the traffic flow with coordinated signalization aimng the Havana corridor. Public Snrvi All public services would be impacted to the extent of the ultimate number of houses, lineal feet of roads, sewer and water, etc. but no differently than any other similiar development or grouping of smaller developments. With the implementation of the proposed arterial, negative impacts on some public services will be eliminated including improved access for fire and safety equipment, possible development of community open space within the dedicated open areas, and improved tax base for the general revenues of Spokane County. Utilities All utilities within proposed project area would be provided by the city of Spokane after consideration by the Boundary Review Board. P E - 1473.84 • Hearing Examiner Committee Actions August 23, 1984 PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PLANNED UNIT DE'iLLOPMENT - EXTENSION OF TIME (Cont'd) 1. PS- 1412 -81., GREENBRIAR TOWNHOUSES- ',ont'd) .4i PROPOSAL: The sponsor is requesting an "Extension of Time" of the Planned Unit Development approval to divide 4.65 acres into 1 open space lot and 38 lots for multiple family dwelling units (townhouses) and the Planned Unit Development overlay zone to the 4.65 at the time of filing the preliminary plat. The sponsor is therefore requesting that the FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN and Preliminary Plat expiration date be extended to August 1, 1987. 3. ACTION: Approved unanimously to August 1, 1987. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION 2. PE- 1472 -84, SUMMER ADDITION ZE- 89 -84, Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban SPONSOR: 927 -2121 John N. Kimsey E. 11425 E. 45th Spokane, WA 99206 SURVEYOR /ENGINEER 325 -4529 James F. Benthin W. 55 Mission Spokane, WA 99201 LOCATION: The proposal is located in the Spokane Valley at the northwest corner of Valley Way and Vista Road. Section 18, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM., Spokane County, Washington COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: URBAN, within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) Boundary. PROPOSAL: The sponsor proposes to divide 37,100 + sq.ft. into 4 lots for single- family dwellings or double -wide manufactured homes and change the existing Agricultural zone to Agricultural Suburban. This is a Replat of Lot 10, Block 12, of "HARRINGTON'S ADDITION TO HUTCHINSON." ACTION: Approved unanimously to September 1, 1987. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION I PE- 1473 -84,i ZE- 88 -84, WILDWOOD TERRACE Agricultural to R -2 and Multiple Family Suburban SPONSOR: 535 -7619 Wallace Construction, Inc. S. 3009 tlt. Vernon Spokane, WA 99203 SURVEYOR /ENGINEER 534 -5272 J. Ronald Dunsmore S. 104 Freya Spokane, WA 99203 Hearing Examiner Committee Actions - August 23, 1984 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION (Cont'd) 1 . 3. PE- 1473 -84, I WILDW00D TERRACE (Cont'd) LOCATION: The proposal is located east and adjacent the Spokane City limits between the County roads of 13th Avenue, Lloyd Road, 16th Avenue and Havana Road, all being approximately 1,500 feet west of Carnahan Road; within Section 23, Township 25N, Range 43 E.W.M. of Spokane County, Washington. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: URBAN, within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. PROPOSAL: The sponsor is requesting to replat 14.5 acres of "WOODLAND TERRACE" into 27 lots for 22 divided duplexes and 5 multiple - family structure and change the existing Agricultural to R -2 and M.F.S. City of Spokane Sewer and Water is also proposed to serve these lots. The duplex lots are proposed for "divided duplexes" (two attached single family dwellings) to allow separate ownership of each half of the duplex and the lot. ACTION: Unanimously decided to continue the Hearing until October 2, 1984 at 9:00 A.M. to allow the sponsor to redesign the preliminary plat, include the entire ownership in the proposal and provide environmental information about the Gravel Pit. 4. SP -84 -320 SHORT PLAT SPONSOR: 922 -0045 Drew R. Auclair E. 12710 E. Main Spokane, WA 99216 SURVEYOR /ENGINEER 924 -9748 Larry Dunsmore N. 1115 Pines Spokane, WA 99216 LOCATION: The proposal is located north and adjacent Valley Way approximately 100 ft. east of the intersection of Valley -Way and Skipworth in the Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, in Section 16, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: URBAN, within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. PROPOSAL DESIGN: The sponsor is requesting approval to subdivide approximately 1.25 acres into 4 parcels. The two southerly lots have frontage on Valleyway and each has an existing home. The two northerly lots would be served by a 30' private road. ACTION: Upheld the Short Plat Administrator's decision, that "guaranteed access" through this proposal. Vote: 2 to 0 -3- .'F WASHINGTON, O.C. 1736 NEW YORK Ave., N.W. SUITE 600 WASHINGTON. O.C. 20000 TCLCPHONC 12021 620 -1700 TELEX 004080 WSH TCLCCOPY 12021 331.1024 ANCHORAGE 420 L SUITE 404 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 90501 TCLCPH ONE 100712721-1060 LAW OFFICES OF PRESTON, THORGRIMSON, ELLIS & HOLMAN 2000 I.E.M. OUILOING P.O. SOX 2027 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 00111 TELEPHONE 12001 623-78150 Mr. George Thompson Wallace Construction Co., Inc. East 518 High Drive Spokane, Washington 99203 Dear Mr. Thompson: TELEX 320428 ITHORSCAI TCLCCOPY 12061 023-7022 July 13, 1984 SPOKANE 6CAIIRST FINANCIAL CCr.'P, SUITE 1.90 SPOKANE. WASHINGTON "!102111 TELEPHONE 150121 024.2!CO PORTLAND PRESTON. CLLIS & HO'UmAr. 1230 S.W IAI AVENUE. SUITE PORTLANO. OREGON 9720a TELEPHONE 15031 f! --J13!5 TCLECOPY 15031 243 R ECEs v E SFP 2 Re: Washington State Housing Finance Commissi M N NSPOKANE f N1y Multifamily Housing Program P E - 1473 14 This letter is to formally acknowledge receipt by the Washington State Housing Finance Commission of your application(s) for official action with respect to a multifamily rental project(s). Enclosed please find a copy of the resolution(s) as passed by the Commission on June 28, 1984 taking official action with respect to such project(s). I apologize for the delay in getting this out to you but be assured that it is effective as of the date that it was passed. As you know, the Commission has received offers from mortgage lenders with respect to its first FNMA bond program and will issue its Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bonds (FNMA Backed Securities Program), Series 1984A in the next several weeks. At the time that we announced this program, we also announced a second FNMA bond program scheduled for early fall. In the materials we mailed to you, we generally described the differences between the first and second programs. The second program, for example, will permit tax - exempt construction financing as well as permanent financing. A key difference between the two programs is that in the first program receipt of a FNMA Commitment was not a prerequisite to reserving bond funds through a mortgage lender. In the second program, however, only those projects that have a FNMA Commitment_ will be eligible for bond proceeds. The Commission will require that evidence of the FNMA Commitment be submitted at the time bond proceeds are reserved. We have had excellent cooperation from FNMA, both in terms of turnaround time and substantive evaluation of project applications. Nonetheless, FNMA does require a significant amount of time to evaluate applications and issue commitments. I would therefore urge you, if you are considering participation in the second FNMA bond program, to contact your mortgage lender as soon as possible and begin the process of FNMA application. We will keep you and the mortgage lenders fully informed of the progress of the program and the results of the first bond issue. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. JAR:dn 29JAR:013 Very truly yours, PRESTON, THORGRIMSON, EL .S & OLMAN- B L G`\ Y A. Reich P E - 1473 - 84 RESOLUTION NO. 84 -6XX A RESOLUTION of the Washington State. Housing Finance Commission taking official action with respect to the issuance of its nonrecourse revenue bonds in the amount of $1,825,000 to provide funds to finance a multi- family rental housing project to be developed by Wallace Construction Co., Inc. WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 161, Laws of Washington, 1983, codified as Chapter 43.180 RCW, as amended, (the "Act "), the Washington *^. - .using Finance Commission (the "Commission ") is authorized to issue its nonrecourse revenue bonds to provide financing for one or more multi - family rental housing projects under the conditions and limitations set forth in the Act; and WHEREAS, Wallace Construction Co., Inc. (the "Developer "), intends to develop a multi - family rental housing project, as described in Exhibit A hereto (the "Project "), and has requested the Commission to issue its revenue bonds pursuant to the provisions of the Act for the purposes of. providing financing for the Project; and WHEREAS, the Commission deems it advisable to declare its intention to authorize one or more issues of its nonrecourse revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $1,825,000 (the "Bonds ") for the purpose of providing all or a portion of the cost of financing the Project when so requested by the Developer, and upon such terms and conditions as may then be agreed upon by the Commission, the Developer, and the purchasers of the Bonds; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Washington State Housing Finance Commission as follows: Section 1. The Commission hereby declares its intention to authorize the issuance and sale of the Bonds pursuant to the provisions of the Act, in a principal amount not exceeding 1 f �7 Q4 P PE � 1`1/�-v s EP27 E � EI VE 1 SPOKANE COUNTY PL4NNING DEPARTMENT $1,825,000, and upon such terms and conditions as may be agreed upon by the Commission, the Developer and the purchasers of the Bonds, for the purpose of providing all or a portion of the cost of acquiring, constructing, installing and /or rehabilitating the Project. This Resolution is not intended to legally bind the Commission to authorize, issue or sell the Bonds. Section 2. The issuance of the Bonds shall be authorized by a subsequent resolution of the Commission at a meeting to be held for such purpose, but only if, when and to the extent that the Commission finds and determines that the rules and regulations of the Commission have been fully complied with, that the financing constitute will effectuate the public purposes of the Commission, that all matters pertaining to such financing are acceptable to the Commis- sion and its counsel, and that all terms and conditions of the financing are acceptable to the Commission, the Developer and the purchasers of the Bonds. Section 3. The proper officials of the Commission are hereby authorized to take such further action as is necessary to carry out the intent and purposes hereof and to issue the Bonds upon the terms and conditions and for the purposes stated herein and in compliance with applicable provisions of law. Section 4. It is intended that, as to the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Bonds, this resolution shall an official action of the Commission, including, without limitation, the "other similar official action" referred to in paragraph 1.103- 8(a)(5) of the Federal Income Tax Regulations. -2- JAR222LISTA 84/06/27 EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION NO. 84 -6XX Project Description The Project shall consist of the acquisition, construction, installation and /or rehabilitation of a multi - family rental housi::g 'erc._., of approximately 50 units to be located east of Havana, and north of 14th Avenue South, in unincorporated Spokane County, Washington. The estimated cost of the Project is not expected to exceed $1,825,000. - JAR222LISTA 84/06/27 ADOPTED at a special meeting, duly noticed and called this +day of CrUne , 19f ATTEST: Secretary Approved as to form: C ;i:el f S Counsel WASHINGTON STATE HOUSING FINANCE COMMISSION By Chair -3- JAR222LISTA 84/06/27 STAFF REPORT August 23, 1984 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF RE: PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE- 1473 -84, WILDWOOD TERRACE ZE- 88 -84, Agricultural to R -2 and Multiple Family Suburban SPONSOR: 535 - 7619 SURVEYOR /ENGINEER 534 - 5272 Wallace Construction, Inc. S. 3009 Mt. Vernon Spokane, WA 99203 J. Ronald Dunsmore S. 104 Freya Spokane, WA 99203 LOCATION: The proposal is located east and adjacent the Spokane City limits between the County roads of 13th Avenue, Lloyd Road, 16th Avenue and Havana Road, all being approximately 1,500 feet west of Carnahan Road; within Section 23, Township 25N, Range 43 E.W.M. of Spokane County, Washington. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: URBAN, within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. PROPOSAL: The sponsor is requesting to replat 14.5 acres of "WOODLAND TERRACE" into 27 lots for 22 divided duplexes and 5multiple- family structure and change the existing Agricultural to R -2 and M.F.S. City of Spokane Sewer and Water is also proposed to serve these lots. The duplex lots are proposed for "divided duplexes" (two attached single family dwellings) to allow separate ownership of each half of the duplex and the lot. 22 R -2 lots x 2 units = 44 families 5 MFS lots x 25 units = 125 families Total Families 169 II SITE PLAN INFORMATION A. Site Size: 14.5 Acres; being the existing property with Final Plat "Woodland Terrace" as follows: Block 8; Block 9; Block 10; Block 19; Block 20 except Lots 7 & 8; Lots 7 - and 11 a 12 of Block 21; Block 23 except Lots 4 - and 9; Block 24 except Lots 5 i 6 and 7 & 8; including some County dedicated roads and alleys to be vacated. B. Site Characteristics: Generally flat with partial tree cover south of 14th Avenue and treeless north of 14th Avenue. The proposal site is vacant. - 19 - - -6 — — R 7 2t0' I -, 1 . — 1 . 3 I 1 L T, - -L r L1, — 7 - LOT O i 1 8 1 a a 1 I 1 1 ; 2m• 210' _9'+7__�___na. 210' 1 e I. 15 1 i L ' r LOT O P Q 7 1 1 F k 1 1° !: 1 , 2ID' :° � LOT O a 1 - i 1 1 1 I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i __J__J L__L__J - - - - r -- r — O' i LOT 11 I 11 1 12 I 1 1 7 1 I I . 1 I I I 1 5 I 1_ 1 y 1 ° 3 1- I BLOCK i 1 i - - : —L__L r- r - r- - LOT O I I 1 e 1 9 1 1G 1 11 1 I I 1 0 —, I I i - -J 2 . O i n.1 1 3 _ . - 1 - 1 BLOCK ; 7 _9'+7__�___na. _ _I S'[EI 6^ O E T 1 BLK `2 • ^ 6 e I � 150' 1 � r r i r- -- -I—T 1 2 1 i 6 15 I . O 1 Ie Y I . BLK 5 • 1 1 7 1 6 1 a I, . 1 \ { , : 12 j [ I v 9 I 1, i I\ 1 t00 j Lx_1__L_J 1_ _\ 5°. _ 1 7 I A PROPOSED PLAT & MULTI FAMIL I :I TH7. 57 ir'1 C^ 112 1 7 I 9 _ I _ LO 11 j 12 100' 0 • • W W W C i 1 100' i 3 100 ue . 3 0 2 11 1 o C eL h O • PLAN VIEIWI — . 20 — WILDW00D TEF 14 ill. AVENUE 15 -S . AVENUE 5 9 16 th. AVENUE STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOCD TERRACE II. SITE PLAT INFORMATION (Cont'd) C. Neighborhood Characteristics: The proposal is located in an area that is predominately undeveloped having a semi -rural character. The site is part of an older Final Plat - Subdivision with "non- conforming" 50 foot wide lots. The Spokane City limit is adjacent at west boundary of the proposal along the east side of Havana. Approximately seven (7) single family dwellings and one (1) single -wide trailer exist adjacent south and west of the proposal. The dwellings are located on two or more of the 50 foot wide lots to allow space for each dwelling and septic tank drainfield, except the trailer. The area is also generally flat and partly tree covered. An abandoned and deep gravel pit is located just north of the proposal (within the sponsor's optioned property). This vicinity of the County and City has yet to develop to full density as platted. This is believed to be due to the lack of City Sewer and due the Gravel Pit influence. D. Agricultural Summary: The Comprehensive Plan has identified this area as URBAN which precludes any agricultural land uses for this site. E. Zoning: Proposal - Reclassify to R -2 for two attached single family dwellings ( "divided duplexes ") except Block 1 of the preliminary plat is proposed to reclassify to MFS for 5 structures with 25 dwelling units each (5 x 25 = 125). Site - the existing zoning is Agricultural, 1958 for Final Plat "Woodland Terrace." North - the existing zoning is Agricultural, 1958 and beyond County's 12th Avenue is Mining (MZ), 1958. Note: Where Agricultural Zone changes to Mining at 12th Avenue (which is the City's 10th Avenue if extended east). East Southeast - South - the existing zoning is Agricultural, 1958 and beyond Carnahan Street is MFS, 1979 and R -1, 1979 for "Kahuna Hills First Addition." the existing zoning is Agricultural, 1958, and adjacent and east of Carnahan Road is R -1, 1976 for "Kahuna Hills Addition" south of 14th Avenue. - the existing zoning is Agricultural, 1958 for 5 acre tracts of Final Plat "Happy's Five Acre Tracts" - 21 - STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE, II. SITE PLAT INFORMATION (Cont'd) E. Zoning: (Cont'd) West - the existing zoning across Havana Road in the City of Spokane is City "R -1" (a zone for single family dwellings which allows lots as small as 7,200 si.ft.) for Final Plat "Tudor Heights Addition ", whose lots are 50x130' or 6,500 si.ft." F. Land Use: Site - Vacant with some tree cover south of 14th Avenue and predominately treeless north of 14th Avenue. North - Vacant treeless and adjacent is an abandoned and deep gravel pit with vertical pit walls. The pit is on lands optioned for purchase by the sponsor and part of a large ownership. East - Vacant which beyond 400+ ft. begins to slope downward to Carnahan. South - Mostly vacant and party tree covered, except four (4) single family dwellings and one (1) single -wide trailer. The dwelling south of 16th Avenue is on just less than 5 acres with large animal keeping. Two of the dwellings are each located on 2 lots combined and one dwelling on a portion of 4 lots combined. However, the single -wide trailer is located on a single lot 50 ft. by 129.5 ft. being 6,475 si.ft. West Mostly vacant and partly tree covered, except three (3) single - family dwellings. One dwelling is on 2 existing lots combined, two dwellings are each on 3 existing lots combined, and one dwelling across Havana at 12th Avenue in the City. Note: The lots in the City are predominately vacant with few homes along 12th Avenue until 500+ ft. west of Havana we find substantial development of single family dwellings on combined 50 ft. lots. Also llth Avenue in the City is being improved (curbs, sidewalks, paving) to accommodate new residential dwellings. G. Comprehensive Plan Designation: The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as URBAN and the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. The proposal does comply with the Decision Guideline policies for "fill -in" development and land use compatibility. (See Special Information below for detailed comments). - 22 - STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (Cont'd) H. Special Information: Circulation - The proposed design of the Preliminary Plat does not include any additional road dedi- cations and proposes to use the existing dedicated roadways within the Final Plat - "Woodland Terrace". Some of the dedicated roadways and alleys within the proposal site are designed to be vacated. The Preliminary Plat is a REPLAT of this recorded final plat, where the existing "non- conforming" 50 foot wide lots are being combined to create R -2 lots 13,000 sq.ft. (typical size) and MFS lots 64,050 sq.ft. The County Engineer is recommending that 14th, 15th, and 16th Avenues, Lloyd, and Morrill be improved to "Access Standards" for the Preliminary Plat's portion of these roadways. Sidewalks are being required along the north side of 14th Avenue as required of multi - family lots. Havana Road is totally within the City Limits and is designated as a "residential street" similar to the County designation of "Access Standard." Planning staff did not receive any specific comments from the City of Spokane (we had mailed two notices). Staff telephoned the City Engineering and City Utility Departments to discuss concerns we had about Havana. Mr. Angelo Baumban of the City Utility Department verbally recommended the following: 1. Require the sponsor to acquire County equivalent of Road 'Improvement District petitions from adjacent property owners along Havana and build Havana (full width) with sidewalks on both sides for the length of the proposal. 2 No RID agreements would be allowed to build Havana at a later time. No Bond would be allowed prior to filing the final plat, that the Havana improvements would have to be completed prior to releasing any Spokane County "Occupancy Permits" for building permits in this County Subdivision. Staff indicated and does not concur with these recommendations for the following reasons: 1. Only two lots are adjacent Havana (one R -2 Lot and One MFS Lot) and both of these lots are designed for side yards adjacent Havana; additionally, staff is restricting direct access onto Havana from either of these lots. -23- STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION ( Cont'd) H. Special Information ( Cont'd) Circulation (Cont'd) 2. Road Improvements for the County roads are adequate to facilitate the impacts of the proposed development and accommodate its vehicular and pedestrian traffic, which provides for traffic flow east to Carnahan, west to 12th Avenue in the City (same as 14th Avenue extended), north (two blocks) on Havana, and south on Havana and on Carnahan. 3. Any improvements to Havana would be for the purposes of the general public and pursuant of recent court decisions would require the general public to bear the expense of such improvements and not the developer. 4. The two lots adjacent Havana would have to pay their proportional share of a road improvement district if and only when such improvements were authorized. Staff's conclusion is that no conditions are necessary regarding Havana prior to the filing of this final plat or issuing building permits on these lots; that the County Engineer conditions provide adequate protection and assurances for circulation and safety for traffic movement. Density The existing density allowed in the recorded "Woodland Terrace" Final Plat is one dwelling per 6,500 sq.ft. (typical 50 ft. by 130 ft.) as "non- conforming" agricultural zoned lots. The Agricultural Zone allows SINGLE -WIDE TRAILERS, which would fit on these 50 ft. wide lots when City sewer is available. Additionally small square footage single - family dwellings would also fit on these 50 ft. lots with City sewer. The proposed 22 R- 2.lots involve 43 of these existing 50 ft. lots; therefore, the difference in potential density is one additional family (22 lots x 2 "attached" single family dwellings = 44 families as compared to the potential 43 single -wide trailers and /or small dwellings). The proposed 5 multi- family lots involve 36 of the existing 50 ft. lots; therefore the potential increase in density is 89 additional families (5 lots x 25 unit apartments = 125 families as compared to a potential 36 single -wide trailers and /or small dwellings). Staff finds that the proposed density is compatible due to the design and location of the proposed apartment buildings and due to the predominately undeveloped characteristic of the adjacent lands. - 24 - STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (Cont'd) Land -Use Compatibility (R -2 Lots) - Staff finds that the sponsor's request to make the following changes to the Preliminary Plat site is compatible with existing adjacent land -uses and would appear to improve the aesthetics of the area by: . Eliminating the existing Agricultural zone, . Reclassifying the zone to R -2 a. prohibiting single -wide trailers b. prohibiting unlimited animal keeping, 3. Constructing two "attached" single family dwellings on each R -2 Lot (defined as "divided duplexes. ") (MFS Lots)- Staff finds the requested changes to Block 1 of the Preliminary Plat to be compatible with the existing and potential land -uses for the following reasons: 1. The Agricultural Zone would be eliminated. 2. That zone would be reclassified to MFS a. which prohibits single -wide trailers b. which prohibits unlimited animal keeping. 3. The sponsor proposes to build "L" shaped multi - family apartments with the buildings located away from Havana and 14th Avenue. 4. The sponsor proposes landscaping and landscape screening to be installed to complement the existing single family homes adjacent the proposal. 5. The apartment buildings will be limited to 2 -story height above the existing ground level. 6. That 4 and 5 above would create building heights and building scale and open area that is similar to and compatible with the existing single family dwellings adjacent 14th Avenue and Havana. (Both R -2 3c MFS Lots) - Staff finds the overall proposal would improve the land -use compatibility and aesthetics of the near vicinity for the following reasons: 1. The area -wide neighborhood and public safety and welfare will be improved by a. developing the vacant and weed covered lots, . b. constructing curb and paved roads, c. constructing a sidewalk on the north side of 14th Avenue. -25- STAFF REPORT, Au5ust 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (Cont'd) Land -Use Compatibility (Cont'd) 1. (Cont'd) d. extending the public water and sewer systems into this undeveloped area. e. installing additional fire hydrants, f. constructing a security /safety fence around the dangerous vertical sidewalls of the abandoned pit. e s 2 . This proposal is part of a larger ownership extending northward to 8th Avenue and eastward to Carnahan Road 120+ acres which includes the abandoned pit. The development of this preliminary plat will facilitate ongoing efforts to further develop additional phases of this larger ownership and thereby progressively accomplish "fill -in" development by: a. providing tcffeha ate the existing pit site, b. providing support intensive development nor_thwa.rd_in_ he rehabilitated pit and pit area, c. providing support ar " "transition" development eastward to Carnahan, d. providing support for continued expansion of the sewer and water systems northwad and eastward, e. providing for improved tax base and for more efficient use of area -wide public services and facilities. Multi- Family Setbacks - Special setbacks are being recommended for the apartments along Havana and 14th Avenue to assure single compatibility and proper "transition" froth apartments to single family and the future two attached single family dwellings ( "divided duplexes. ") Additionally the sponsor proposes to orient as many of the apartment units toward the north overlooking the future rehabilitated pit and development on the Valley Floor further northward. These apartments will have a Substantial view as the elevation drops 100 feet. The setbacks for the lot at Havana and 14th Avenue will prohibit any building within a rectangle 150 feet north of 14th Avenue and 100 feet east of Havana - -- providing a guaranteed 15,000 sq.ft. open -space area at the northeast corner of 14th and Havana The setbacks along 14th Avenue will prohibit any apartment building within 85 feet of 14th Avenue centerline. Landscaping - Landscaping and landscape screening is being proposed by the sponsor and is being recommended as conditions of approval to assure compatibility between the existing single family homes and the proposed apartments. 4 to 5 feet irrigated evergreen screening (as Arbivita) is being required along the west side of Lot 1, Block 1 adjacent Havana, except for necessary "clear view" triangle at 14th and Havana. Landscape with partial evergreen screening is being required at the southerly end of each apartment building. - 26 - STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (Cont'd) Landscaping (Cont'd) NOTE: The proposed "L" shaped apartments will place the top of the "L" toward 14th Avenue and the bottom of the "L" toward the Pit; therefore only the end of the apartments will face the existing single family dwellings along 14th and creating the optimum "open- space" between 14th Avenue and apartments (the bulk of the apartments will be at the north side of the lots adjacent the Pit and not adjacent 14th Avenue). Pit - The abandoned gravel (basalt) pit has a vertical sidewall at the north end of Lot 3, Block 1 with a vertical drop of approximately 75 to 100 feet with the Pit walls further west and east of that point progressively decrease from being vertical. The sponsor indicates his intent to rehabilitate the pit which would not eliminate the more vertical pit walls and that the pit is far too large to fill in; therefore, he proposes to install a substantial security /safety fence around the dangerous portions of the pit bluff and staff is recommending conditions that would require such improvement in conjunction with any bulding permit issued in the entire proposal. School - The proposal is in the School District #81 with elementary schools within 1/2 and 3/4 miles of the site - -- Sheridan School at Freya and 6th Avenue to the northwest and Lincoln Heights School at Thor and 22nd Avenue to the southwest. With most direct pedestrian route being west on 12th Avenue, then north or south on Freya. We did not receive any comments from the District of the notice mailed to them. Parks - The report "Planning for Park" (revised 1976) indicates this proposal is located at the south perimeter of the "Alcott" neighborhood, which does not plan for any park at the preliminary plat site. Water Supply - City of Spokane will provide water. An approved Water Plan will be required prior to finalizing this preliminary plat. A Water main and fire hydrant is already extended into the site. Sewage Disposal ' - The County Utilities Department has approved public sewer with provisions for connecting to City Sewer. Sewer mains exist at 12th (same as 14th) and Havana. Note: Both sewer and water service must have Boundary Review Board approval prior to connecting to these water and sewer mains. - 27 - STAFF REPORT, August , 1984 PE- 1473 -84 1 WILDWOOD TERRACE II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (Cont'd) Fire - The proposal is within Fire District #1. The Fire District and County Building and Safety Department (Fire Marshal) are required to approve fire protection provisions prior to finalizing the preliminary plat by reviewing the Water Plan for hydrants, hydrant spacing, water flow capacity and emergency access. Cultural Resources - None have been identified. III. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS A. Land Use: Staff finds the proposed replat of the Final Plat - "Woodland Terrace" for 22 lots for two "attached" single family dwelling (divided duplexes) and 5 apartments with 25 units each to be compatible with the existing and proposed land -uses, as conditioned. B. Zoning: Staff finds the requested zone reclassification from Agricultural to R -2 and MFS to be compatible with the proposed uses and existing land uses, as conditioned. That the reclassification is supported by "changed conditions" as adoption of the Urban Category in the Comprehensive Plan, adoption of the Wastewater Management Plan, adoption of the ASA Overlay zone and the availability of City sewer and water service. That the zone change will improve the land -use compatability and aesthetics by prohibiting unlimited animal keeping, prohibiting single -wide trailers, and allowing development suited for "view lots" and more efficient land -use as "divided duplexes." C. Comprehensive Plan: Staff finds the proposal meets the purpose and intent of the URBAN designation; as "fill -in" development for the Urban Category,for the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA), and for the existing public services and facilities of the near vicinity. More specifically, the proposal will support further "fill -in" development of the large island of undeveloped land and provide for a "variety of lifestyle" while "improving" the land -use compatibility and asethetics of the vicinity. The public health, safety and general welfare is found to be "improved" with the development of the site (i.e., roads, water, sewer, fire protection, Pit safety and improved aesthetics of vacant undeveloped land). IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and has been reviewed by the Planning staff. No significant adverse environmental impacts were judged to exist. Possible slight adverse environmental impacts were identified on the checklist in the following categories: earth, air, water, flora, fauna, noise, light and glare, land use, population, housing, transportation /circulation, public services, and utilities. - 28 - STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (Cont'd) NOTE: Staff concluded that developing the site as proposed appears to eliminate existing impacts on the physical environment. The County Subdivision Administrator issued a "Proposed Declaration of Non - Significance ", and it was circulated to other agencies of jurisdiction and no comments have been received as of the printing of this report; therefore, recommends a "Final Declaration of Non - Significance" be signed by the Hearing Examiner Committee Chairperson. V. LEAD AGENCY RECOMMENDATION The County Planning Department, in considering the above information and conclusions, and further considering that forthcoming public testimony would not identify unanticipated and unresolvable problems, does RECOMMEND APPROVAL. This recommendation of approval is, in part, based on the following recommended "conditions of approval ", and therefore staff additionally recommends that the following conditions be attached to the Hearing Examiner Committee approval, if approval is granted. Staff further commends the proposal and its apparent "quality design" for a unique lifestyle - -- that is seen as a positive and complimentary development for the community. VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommmended. COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. That the Plat be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and /or attached sheets as noted. Phasing be allowed as approved by the County Subdivision Administrator. 2. That preliminary plat of record approval is for the property described in the Legal Description, signed and stamped by the sponsor's licensed land surveyor, being part of the application for this proposal. 3. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for three (3) years to September 1, 1987. The applicant may request an Extension -of -Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. Such applications should demonstrate the progress made toward finalizing this preliminary plat. If an Extension -or -Time is not requested in a timely manner or said Extension is not granted, then the preliminary plat and the is NULL a VOID. 4. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (3) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements unless the applicant(s) /sponsor(s) choose to file a notarized Waiver of Notice of Action with the Spokane County Planning Department. - 29 - STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Cont'd) 5. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C.RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SEC), a proposed declaration of non- significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the physical environment; a finding is hereby made that no probable significant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of this project; and a Final Declaration of Non - Significance is hereby to be issued. 6. That a Final Plat name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 7. That appropriate road names be indicated, and approved by the County Subdivision Administrator. 8. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat,for distribution to the County Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of said utility easements by said utility companies must be received with the submittal of the final plat. 9. That a plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier, fire protection district and Spokane County Building 1 Safety Department (Fire Marshal). Said WATER PLAN must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The Health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), fire protection district, and County Building 1 Safety Department (Fire Marshal) will certify with signature on said WATER PLAN, prior to the filing of the final plat or final plat of each phase of the preliminary plat. Said certification shall indicate that said plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. Said WATER PLAN and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify that appropriate contractual arrangements or agreements have been made with the plat sponsor- for construction of the water system in said final plat, in accordance with the approved WATER PLAN and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within said final plat. The arrangements or agreements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. - 30 - STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Cont'd) 9. (cont'd) The final plat dedication will cohtain the following statement: "the public water system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building 4 Safety Department, and water purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 10. That no building permit will be issued for any lot within the Final Plat until certified by a Washington State licensed engineer "that the water system has been installed pursuant the approved WATER PLAN for the FInal Plat ", signed and stamped by said engineer. The certification may be in the form of a letter but is preferred to be certified on a copy of said WATER PLAN as a schematic map showing the "As Built" water plan. 11 That a current certificate of title be furnished the County Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 12 That the following statement be placed in the final plat dedication: "no more than one structure be placed on Lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purpose of creating additional lots, ownerships, or building sites without first filing a replat." 13 Upon filing the final plat the zone change shall be finalized and the existing Agricultural zone classification shall be changed to R -2, except Preliminary Plat Block 1 be changed to MFS. 14 That prior to filing the final plat, a specific landscape plan with irrigation system be prepared by a qualified professonal and submitted to the Spokane County Subdivision Administrator for review and approval with provisions for: a. Substantial landscape screening along the west side of Lot 1, Block 1, which provide visual screening of existing or potential residences on lots west across Havana (Note, total screening may not be required for the full length of Lot 1). The screening shall be living evergreen trees or shrubs and planting height of 4 to 5 feet of a specie that will grow to a height of at least 10 feet, such as arborvitae. A "clear view triangle" is required at 14th Avenue and Havana. b. A partial landscape and landscape screening is required along the south "end" of each apartment building. - 31 - STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Cont'd) 15. That a building setback is required 85 feet north of 14th Avenue centerline for all lots within Block 1 and a setback at the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, being a rectangle 150 feet north -south and 100 feet east -west. 16. That the building setbacks be designated on the Final Plat map and referenced in the Final Plat dedication, as aproved by the County Subdivision Administrator. 17. That the MFS lots be substantially developed as indicated on the " concept site plans" for the apartments, as approved by the County Subdivision Administrator. The purpose being to assure the general concept of "L" shaped apartments, located at the north end of the lots, and the open -space oriented toward 14th Avenue. 18. That the profile or height of the apartments shall not exceed 2 -story plus foundation from the present ground level. The purpose being to prevent 3 or more story structures above the existing ground elevation and maintain a compatible profile with the existing and future adjacent dwellings south and west. 19. That the final plat dedication indicate: "No direct access shall be allowed onto Havana from Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 ". NOTE: A crash gate for fire protection is acceptable for Lot 1, Block 1 onto Havana, if necessary. 20. That as part of the landscaping plan, a plan for 6 ft. security /safety fence along the perimeter of the Pit bluff shall be submitted by the sponsor to the County Subdivision Administrator for review and approval. The intent is to provide a fence for those areas of the Pit bluff owned by the sponsor where a child or person could slip and not be able to recover due to the steepness of the pit sides or sidewalls. 21. That the final plat dedication reference to or include provisions of operation and maintenance of the Pit Safety Fence by the owners of adjacent property and /or lots. 22. That prior to issuing the "Final Inspection" or "Occupancy" Permit for any building permit within this preliminary plat the 6 ft. Pit Safety Fence or equivalent safety provision shall be constructed. The intent is to assure that any new families in this development will have existing provisions for safety regarding the Pit. 23. That the fence shall have posted warning signs. 24. That provision for "divided duplexes" are approved for the R -2 lots. - 32 - rJ STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) COUNTY ENGINEERING CONDITIONS (Cont'd) 34. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County 'Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees in new construction. 35. That the County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impacts of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the roadway improvements herein specified. 36 That Public Road Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section be: "Section Number 1 for 14th Avenue north side minimum paving width "Access standard ". "Section Number 2 for 14th Avenue south side minimum paving width "Access standard ". "Section Number 2 for 15th, 16th, Lloyd & Morrill minimum paving width "Access standard ". 37. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from Lot 1, Block 1, Lot 1, Block 2 onto Havana. 38. Existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and curbed to Spokane County standards. 39. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. 40. Applicant shall petition the Board of County Commissioners to vacate those public road right -of -ways which are proposed for use as portion of lots. These vacations must be accomplished prior to filing any portion of the plat which proposes use of road right -of -way parcels. 41. Any petition to vacate county road right -of -way shall be for vacation of full width right -of -ways. COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 42. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 43. That connection be made to City of Spokane's sanitary sewer system. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS 44. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS). -34- STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) COUNTY PLANNING CONDITIONS (Cont'd) 25. That appropriate "divided duplex" lot lines shall be designated on the Final Plat as approved by the Spokane County Subdivision Administrator. COUNTY ENGINEERING CONDITIONS 26. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record, as approved by the County Engineer. 27. That plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 28. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 29. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 30. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right -of -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 31. All construction within the existing or proposed public Right -of -Way is to be completed prior to filing each final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 32. A statement must appear in the dedicatory language of the final plat: "that individual driveway access permits be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system." 33. That all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. - 33 - STAFF REPORT, August 23, 1984 PE- 1473 -84 WILDWOOD TERRACE VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ( Cont'd) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS (Cont'd) 45. Prior to filing any final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on each plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems are prohibited." 46. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage systems shall not be authorized." COUNTY BUILDING 4 SAFETY DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 47. That the WATER PLAN shall show the location of each fire hydrant or fire prevention facility and must comply with Chapter 10.04 of the Spokane County Uniform Fire Code Ordinance, as amended. 48. That the WATER PLAN shall specify the gallons per minute for each fire hydrant at residual pressure of no less than 20 p.s.i. (a minimum pressure). 49. That the Water Purveyor and Fire District shall sign the WATER PLAN prior to County Building a Safety Department's review. - 3 5 - - 3 6 - TO: PLANNING Di-PARU9EIJT FROM: Courier ENGINLLRS ULNAkIMENI S k'UKA UCOUM , SUBJECT.: ROAD CONDIT Or1_;� FOR PLAT NAME W; \c\��`?23Q .J A—R,NUMBE PE u42 3__ 'CONDITIONS LIRCLED APPLY TO PLAT UNDER LONSTDEFLATION that conditional approval of thu plat by the County Engineer Is given subject to d 4a - t - 4 0 - e- -m.p Rig.A4--o 4. approval of the road system as Indicated In the preliminary plat of record.' - that plans, profiles, and cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb'yradus be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road' plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Protesslonal Civil Engineer. that drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for'approval prior to construction and /or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Protesslonal Civil Engineer. E 4 -that the 'regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat Is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. .construction wlthln the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate In writing that all improve- ments were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced; 6 11-no construction work Is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way until a permit has been Issued by the County Engineer. All work Is subject to I,nspecti,dn and approval by the County. Engineer; all construction within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way Is to be com- pleted prior to filing the tlnel plat or a bond In the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of.constructlon of Improvements, construction certlflca- tlon, "As Built" plans, and monument ing the street centerlines shall be tiled with the County Engineer; E 8 -no direct access from lots to 1/2 Right of Ways until such roads are constructed to County Standards and establ lshed as County Roads; E 9 -no direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads; EIO -road design, construction, and drainage control for 1/2 Right of Ways and Stub Road • connections are the responsibility of the Developer; Ell that appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held In trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1 tt. strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Tem- porary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat bou a statement must appear In the dedicatory language of the plat that Individual drl.e way access permits be required prior to Issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. E13 dedication of eddlt!onal Right of Way along _ additional Right of Way along additional Right of May along E14 -a statement ,hall be pieced In plat ducicailun that no direct ',,ccu'•'• 1, allowed from lots to E'S -that a statement bu plated In the plat du•Jicatlon providing for tut uru slope ease- ments ns ru.iulred by Spokane County along accOSS to the rL CI> u.int log Coen ty I providing diro..t curve. to ., ,■eno Count, ,Ianda , I,u de.l nod and , .. , r l: U. ta„ .• p, k .1 no ..o.,n 1, If i ;Moat aII u.. .,; I, t �a4s • !t h in trio plat y �. st an.: aI a.. I. I e .. ,, . . ..' n . r � l ,, - I ,I 1 4 0 n i t w I .I I I s 1 OIL i�fll I d an0A10 A vow • k19 b'unlld P,.oJ standatJ bi ll. .AI N.,nt•ay h e • . / ur /y /� - NoR 'n ` /aa Mi01mun, I- a.1 • bath gtC.6S5 5><�.- 11). Suctlon Numner ' . ( 11 Suction Numh,:r 2 t•n /4 fa./E Min l mum Pa.1ng •1dth Alan - stet_ ( , 3 ) Svc 1 I on Num b or 2_ _ 1or /5 /6 r" MIn Im um (4) S.n:tlon Number - __ lur Lyoyi/ /Ibtr ; i / Minimum Paving width pccE.i fI— --- S. — the word "applical,t" shall Include the owner or owners of the property, ,his hell's,. • assigns, and successors. 'construct Thu road Improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the epprov; el of the County Lnglneur, join In and he a willing participant In any petition or resolution. which purposes is the formation of a Road Improvement District .(RID) :tor satd- pursuant to RCM Sb.bh, as amended: At such time es an RID is• gated or any Ruad Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, 'the Improve' is required (c.urb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing. pe w .... t) will be at the sole expanse of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grants assigns. - an alternative method of constructing the road Improvement stated hereln, applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improve ments stated herein by joining and participating In a County.Road protect (CRP) 10 s extent of the required road Improvement. At such time as an ,RID Is created or y Road Improvement Protect Is sanctioned -by. Spokane County, the Improvements re- Ired (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and.peving to existing pavement) will be at e sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. at the following statement be placed In the plat d edication: The owners, :their heirs, grantees and assigns, agree to join In the formation of a County. Road improvement District pursuant to R.C.M. 36.88 at such time es a Road Improvement strict Is created or any Road Improvement Project Is sanctioned by Sp, County. The Improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control end paving) .011 be it e sole expense: of the owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. • at the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer` a design proposal • ceptable to State, Highway Department of the proposed State Highway- County Road Interjection. - State Hlghway'Depertment approval of the proposed design ■ust' Iceived'Prlor to the'fl,ling of the final plat. Improvements to the' State HlghwaY , are to be the responsibility of the Sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond o. cover the cost•of such Improvements furnished to -the County Engineer"In the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. lots with: )e proposed private roed(s).as shown on the preliminary plat serving . no extension possible; extenslon'to serve 8 or less lots; tutur< publ,lm Right of Way tract Is approved by the County Engineer. • d hat private road(s) be Improved to Spoken. County standard privatelroader standard serving -_ _ .coon 10.207 of the Spokane County Fire Code. hat the following provision be made that the following described property be held In rust until the continuation of the private road and the "Tr.ct•X" Is deeded or .dedi- cated: e 1 ft. strip at the ends or edges of .011 -private "Tract X" that terminate or order the plat boundary. • statement shall be placed in the plat dedication that the "Tract X" private roadls) • contained within this plat Is /are tor the sole use of parcels within the plat until such time as the roadway Is Improved and established. es a public road. , hat the following statement be placed In the plat dedication: WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, Improve, maintain, or other- wise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described In thls plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently bye allo assumes no building permit to be Issued on property on a private road, P obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledg he Count cos no ct ligation r, any kind imd or na to establish, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal 'on a pr r, d.tar, fe re ui improve, Is o th r oed. f t he requirement s ucces s shall i n n binding sorS assigns including the obligation toparl Appn the other, inter hoar o, private road as provided herein. .I pate In the maintenance of the l trio proposed plat shall be Improved to the standards set torth.ln Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution Mo. 00 - 1592, as amended, which establishes regula- tions fur roads, approaches, drainage, and fees In new construction. the County En ylnuer na 11 A a min . :d thls dovelopment proposal and has determined that the Impact ut this proposal upon the e.lsting County l Road n is s tart larrantsl the,dedica- tlon of 'eAditlooal r lint-of-way and the roadway J.I /Y / 7 /l .S� lO�f- Cali) i-« rid N CZ ,:i u 4 C ,.c ' r.t -/ C J o{� k e-. A)- Cki-.�� B'lo'ts._ t A 4..1 )lt o4 �1)11.1.�_ l' -L 2.1 :_ - r {fid:�:) sad • . V A '.. 'ttr j AC:, r * i iA I. _ kq(/)ilant5 nacfgf 0 71;e,�. r w y Oa* a� :. tit - .Wh - 401E i L v IAA) �C1'1t10 e s,) y {- .i1-v C.' t Q(.0 n>•[ril '�1 ti 1G f f4 TI �11 r 1 -, i :v TYV. s 5 ....t: ti' 4 'c.c \, Cti' -i1n.v J 'r u' , 0 li_ V .A( C.r‘•_ . • t / t �3� f- q _ . i ' , . (Y ;J ' , C '.) (at -AVc :2.0ut1 (Zo P . c 4 ti ;.-6.1,.r ,. i , i, -r.vi . i)c Von- liAC_F� "•, "r ta.1 [, :...e.�� tct 1- r. 0 i (.,A(j5, Richard L. Skalstad E. 16917 Sprague Avenue Veradale, WA 99037 Dear Rich: FKS /wm cc: Jim Emacio Wally Hubbard First District F. KEITH SHEPARD Second District SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0100 September 2 1 , 1984 R E C F I V E fl SEP 2 11984 I have reviewed your correspondence and enclosures dated September 17, 1984. After a review of the same I have requested that Mr. Hubbard have that person who will be presenting the "Wildwood Terrace" appli- cation have the applicant at the outset of the public hearing make a part of the record any interest which Mr. Myers may have in the pro- ject. Additionally, your correspondence and enclosures will be placed within the Planning Department's file on this item. Lastly, I have requested that Mr. Emacio make himself available to the Hearing Examiner Committee at the October 2, 1984 public hearing on this item. Very truly yours, F . W th Shepard, Chairman Cointy Commissioner GRANT C. PETERSON Third District SPOKANE CUU!IY PLANNING DEPAR{MEN1 September 17, 1984 Board of County Commissioners Spokane County Courthouse W. 1116 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Dear Commissioners: On August 23, 1984, John Nunnery, as subdivision administrator, materially misrepresented to the hearing examiner committee the status of the applicant's ownership of the property involved in PE-1473 -84, ZE-88 -84, Wildwood Terrace. The tape recording of the hearing will confirm that John repeatedly stated that the applicant owned the property. John also had informed me earlier on tour on August 22, 1984, that the applicant owned the entire 116 acres. At hearing I repeatedly questioned Mr. Nunnery as to whether the applicant owned the land or had an option or some other interest. At hearing Mr. Nunnery opined that an option and ownership are the same thing. I reviewedthe file of PE- 1473 -84, ZE -88-84 Wildwood Terrace, on September 12, 1984, and appended to the application for Wildwcod is a real estate purchase and sale agreement dated July 6, 1984. It is apparent to me that Mr. Numery made a material misrepresentation to the hearing examiner committee regarding the status of land ownership when that land was subject to an option contract in which the chairperson of the planning commission has a financial interest. On August 27, 1984, I had a conference with Mr. Hubbard. His position was that he is in 1X)% support of Mr. NUppery. My position is that it is inproper for Mr. Nuiuiery to a Material misrepresentation regarding the status of an application in which the chairperson of the planning commission is financially interested.The effect of this misrepresentation is to conceal from the can - mittee and the public the chairperson's financial interest in the option contract. You will note that the option will only be exercised and the chair- person financially benefitted if the appropriate zoning is granted by the com- mittee. The reality is that with the tremendous work load experienced by the hearing examiner committees, it is extremely rare for committee members to physically examine and read entire files in any except the most controversial apptications. The committees as a matter of course rely on the staff to present all the relevant information at public hearing; in oral form. page one RICHARD L. SKALSTAD Afflyn 11 In l 1 MAOUI AVI VIRADALI. WA NOP aoe i36e137 • 1ST DIST. DIST. 3RD DIST. - .. — • • C D •• r • • 1 SEi a V I�V1 CO: NT? COMMISSIONERS RICHARD L. SKALSTAD AIPom.7 AI 14* 4 1S719 SPRAGUE AVE. VEMDALE. WA 90077 1.0,1 046177 September 17, 1984 Board of Canty Ccnnissiorers' page two It is my position that W. Hubbard should be directed by the board to publicly disclose at Miring on October 2, 1984, that the chairperson of the planning camnission is financially interested in rzopticn contract of Which PE-1473 -84, X88.84, Wildwood Terrace is the subject. Since Mr. Hubbard has indicated his unequivocal support for W. Nunnery's failure to disclose this ei at io n at public hearing on August 23, 1984, I can only request you direct Mr. Hubbard to file a copy of this letter under application number PE_1473- 84..ZE- 88-84, Wildwood Terrace, so .that it becomes a part of the public record. enclosures: August 23, 1984 letter from Richard L. Skalstad August 24, 1984 memo from John Nunnery y real estate purchase and sale agreement of July Z MV - xd T. Skalstad Attorney at Law to Wallis Hubbard Hubbard 6, 1984 September 14, 1984 The Honorable Sheri Barnard Spokane City Hall W. 808 Spokane Falls Blvd. Spokane, WA 99201 -3335 Dear Sheri: RICHARD L. SKALSTAD Attorney a Lew E. 16719 SPRAGUE AVE. VERADALE. WA 99037 (5091 9 26.513 7 Please find enclosed a copy of my letter to Governor Spellman on the above date and the same enclosed materials. I would greatly appreciate it if the entire 116 acres which comprise Wildwood were reviewed by your planning staff and an opinion provided to my committee by October 2. 1984, as to whether city planners and engineers think it is safe to fill the Inland Asphalt Pit with water and build 1,352 units around it. May I suggest that an area such as this may be ideal for a joint city-county detailed planning effort. 0 /yours 'chard L. Skalstad Attorney at Law ECEIVED SEP i 9 1984 SPOKANE COUNTY PIANNINGDEPART st9 1 719434 oc 11 A September 14, 1984 The Honorable John Spellman Office of the Governor Legislative Building • Olympia, WA 98504 RICHARD L. SKALSTAD Attorney al le VI E. 16719 SPRAGUE AVE. VERADALE. WA 99037 (509) 92G-5137 Dear Governor Spellman: I an a Spokane County Planning Commissioner from County Commissioner District &rnber 3. I was appointed by Commissioner Grant C. Peterson in April of 1982. I serve on the Hearing Examiner Committees in Spokane County for both subdi- visions and zoning. On August 23, 1984, in my capacity as subdivision hearing examiner, application number PE- 1473 -84, ZE- 88 -84, Wildwood Terrace, was presented before me.' The Hearing Examiner Committee hasno subpoena powers and no contempt powers and is wholly dependent upon the planning department staff and upon the diligence and good will of the state agencies in obtaining necessary information. Based on the information provided by staff, governmental agencies, and public testimony, our committee hopefully makes decisions which are factually correct and protective of the health, safety, and welfare of all of the citizens of Spokane County. On August 23, 1984, not one single person from any state agency appeared before the Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee regarding one of the largest proposed projects in recent history in Spokane County. I am enclosing a copy of the order of continuance regarding Wildwood Terrace. The hearing was continued to October 2, 1984, to allow state agencies and .other interested agencies, municipal and county, to supply needed information that was requested by citizens of Spokane County at the hearing on August 23, 1984. Wildwood Terrace is one of the largest projects ever proposed for Spokane County. The project proposes to rehabilitate a mining operation and turn it into Spokane County's newest "lake". To date, no state agency has even made a determination of whether an environmental review should be made of this project, let alone a determination of whether an environmental impact statement should be required. The Wildwood Terrace project is an approximate 116 acres located east and adjacent to the Spokane City limits. The first phase entails 14.5 acres with 159 units. This is an approximate 507 people. There is an approximate 101.5 acres remaining with an approximate 7- additional phases. This additional page one R ECEI JED SEP 19 1984 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT September 14, 1984 The Honorable John Spellman page two RICHARD L. SKALSTAD . A 9omr, •I low E. 16719 SPRAGUE AVE. VERADALE. WA 99037 (509) 926.5131 phasing would result in 1,183_units and 3,549 people. The totals for the project based on the same scale as the first phase are: 1,352 units and 4,056 people (using 3 persons per household). The Wildwood file is devoid of any response from the Washington State Department of Ecology, the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, and the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. The response from the Washington State Department of Transportation does not address the impact of a potential 1,352 units on I -90. I am enclosing a copy of the environmental check list for the first phase, the 169 units. The checklist indicates that the sponsor intends to rehabilitate the Inland Asphalt Pit site. The sponsor's testimony at the hearing on August 23, 1984, indicates that he intends to fill the pit with water and thereby create a "lake" to enhance his development. Answers to the environmental check list under section II, Environmental Impacts, indicate that the project could result in unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructure. Furthermore, the alteration of the flow of ground waters might result from the addition or withdrawal of water. The sponsor is in effect proposing to build 1,352 units around the lip of a mining pit and fill that pit with water, and his own environmental check list indicates geological and hydro- logical problems. The citizens at the hearing on August 23, 1984, wanted to know where this` water for this new "lake" will cane from and where it will go. I had hoped that someone from the Department of Ecology would testify on this. The citizens wanted to know if it was safe to fill an abandoned mining operation with water, and whether Inland Asphalt did not have a prior superseding obligation to reclaim this pit under state law and prior zoning conditions of approval. I had hoped that someone from the Department of Natural Resources could testify on this. Citizens wanted to know if the 1,352 units will slide into the "lake" because of the unstable earth conditions . and change in ground water flow. I had hoped that your ecology, mining, and water people,could shed some light on this concern. I have in the'past seen your transportation people relentlessly pursue hearings when a new truck -stop was impacting an I -90 interchange, yet in a proposal that entails a potential 1,352 units and 4,056 people abutting I -90, your trans- portation people do not appear.. I would appreciate it greatly and so would the citizens of Spokane County if the people at the appropriate state agencies would review this entire 116 acre proposal and having reviewed it, appear to testify on October 2, 1984, at 9:00 A.M., at the Spokane County Planning Commission Hearing Roan September 14, 1984 The Honorable John Spellman page three at North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington, 99260. Simply stated, the hearing examiner committee has to have the information necessary to make a determination as to whether or not these 1,352 units and 4,056 human beings will slide into this new "lake". It is frankly beyond my comprehension that the appropriate state agencies have not even made a threshold environmental review in this case. cc: Jean Silver cc: Sheri Barnard RICHARD L. SKALSTAD Attorney •1 Lew E 16719 SPRAGUE AVE. VERADALE. WA 99037 (5091 926-5737 Richard L. Skalstad Attorney at Law enclosures: findings and order of continuance signed August 28, 1984 environmental checklist declaration of nonsignificance SEPA Mailing list SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Spokane County Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee on August 23, 1984 and the members of the Committee present being Jerry Williams, Chairperson, Ron McVicker and Rich Skalstad. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Wallace Construction, Inc. is requesting approval_ of a preliminary plat of PE- 1473 -84, Wildwood Terrace, and Zone Reclassification, ZE- 88 -84, from Agricultural to R -2 and Multiple Family Suburban for subdivision of 14.5 acres of "Woodland Terrace" into 27 lots for 22 divided duplexes and 5 multiple - family structure, and there being present, the following applicant or representative: GEORGE THOMPSON C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the information presented in the STAFF REPORT was considered. - 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as URBAN. 3. That the proposal is within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. 4. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of this proposal, as change in existing lifestyle; incompatible land -uses; issues regarding rehabilitatiohand operation of the gravel pit; existence of improper fencing; operation of a pit within 1,000 feet - of residential development; traffic; fire protection; "foot -in -the- door" for other development; vacation of roads; who pays for cost of improvements; value of the new houses and vacation process for dedicated roads. 5. That "overall safety" of a proposal is a consideration of a preliminary plat decision. 6. That changing the zoning on this proposal does not prevent animal keeping on existing adjacent properties and constitutes a classic land -use conflict between Agricultural and Multiple Family Suburban zoning. 7. Havana Road in the'City may need to be improved. 8. Landfill and the pit rehabilitation need to be addressed. 9. That Urban "fill -in" does not mean you stick MFS in a single family area. 10. That the pit area will develop and density of this proposal might be justifiable if the entire optioned ownership (118 acres) is looked at for proposed use. August 23, 1984 Findings & Order File No. PE- 1473 -84 Wildwood Terrace 11. That the entire optioned ownership should be made part of the preliminary plat. 12. That the mining regulations need to be looked at. 13. That an EIS should be done to address the pit. 14. That the hearing should be continued to October 2, 1984, to allow the sponsor time to provide additional information requested by the Hearing Examiner Committee. D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS DECISION Continue this Hearing item to October 2, 1984 at 9:00 A.M. E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Preliminary Plat PE- 1473 -84, Wildwood Terrace, and Zone Reclassification ZE -88 -84 from Agricultural to R -2 and MFS be continued to October 2, 1984. Motion by: Rich Skalstad Seconded by: Ron McVicker Jerry Williams - Aye Ron McVicker - Aye Rich Skalstad - Aye ATTEST: By: Date: JOHN NUNNERY Spokane County Subdivision Administrator (0- kiStiv a /ze HEARING EXAMINER C01?IITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER AND VOTE. ,....., ,. "•r• Si"oM�± t© t rr ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST P EE; X473.84 SEC/TWH /RNG: 23 -25 -43 Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and 'adversely ", as per WAC 197 -10) affecting the quality of the physical environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes' or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the degree of impact, asking you for more information, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision - makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages, if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required envirorunental review without unnec- essary delay. N The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for every yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required to provide explanation for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Wallace Construction Inc 2. Address of Proponent: South 3009 Mt. Vernon Spokane, WA 99203 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 7 -10 -R4 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Spokane County Planning Department 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: Wildwood Terrace 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Development of 5 Multi - Family (MFS) lots (125 Units) and 22 R -2 Lots (44,Units) in a Divided Duplex Lot configuration allowing single family type ownership of each Side. Some recreational common ownership will be incorporated as shown on preliminz 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the Proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): East of Havana between 13th Ave and 16th on rocky, undeveloped land. This ownershi has not previously developed due to lack of available sewer. Partial rehab. of old pit site. 8. tstimated Date for Completion of Proposal: 1085 9. List of all Permits, Licenses, or Government ApD vals A tred for the Proposal (f deral, s te, and local - including rezones): ounoary Keview board- utlllty Extenslons, Spokane C ounty Engineers- Road /Drainage Design,' Spokane County Building and Safety - Building Permits 10a. Do you, or the owner in the event you do not own the subject land, have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: Yes, I hope to develop a plan to rehabilitate the adjacent Inland Asphalt Pit site. 1 535 - 7619 Phone Number: be P4-1473 - 10b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's location? If yes, explain: c /C(a4 , 11. Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: ALPO 12. Attach any completed, form: other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been but is e e ed to bef led at some future date, describe the/nature of such ap ,ication Se c LSO c.t eat /C f /-e- J -ec-u dLP, l/ e ' y4444.7 Grimy Cry II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all 'yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Unstable earth conditions or to changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil ?. . . (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion or soils, either on or off the site ?. (f) Changes in deposition of erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion whichmay modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation; 5, 0 es ..eir�� ciCe c / /T 4r c ) /c. = 2. Air. Mill the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: ;(s-- 2 or any change in Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water ln.any water body? (e) Discharge into surface water, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but notlimited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of ieachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? 1G ✓ v Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora, and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora Into an area, or to a barrier'to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? _ _ �✓ Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or number of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? ✓ _ (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna Into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: 6. Noise. Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal Increase existing noise levels? ✓_ _ Explanation: 1. Light and Glare. Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal produce new light or glare? , . . _✓ _ Explanation: 8. Land Use. Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource' Explanation: Yes Maybe No E _ i R7'I _ UA' 10.• Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the Yes Maybe release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: 11. Population. W111 the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: 12. Houslna. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parting facilities, or demand for new parking? _— (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? ✓ (e) Alterations (f) Increase in bicyclists, Explanation: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services to any of the following areas: .(a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including reads? (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: • • to waterborne, rail or air traffic? traffic hazards to motor vehicles, or pedestrians? 15. Enervy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 4 4 84 Ho Yes Maybe No ✓ Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No r Yes Maybe No ✓ Yes Maybe No t/ 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems. Yes Maybe No or a terations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Cocmuntcation systems? v (c) Water? — (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposai? Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazards or potentia health hazard (including mental health)? Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result to the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation: Will the proposal result to an impact upon the quality or Yes Maybe No quant ty of existing recreational opportunities? ✓ Explanation: 20. Archeological/Historlcal. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? . . . Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any will- ful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may with- draw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue/ reliance upon this c.. cklist. Date: Ju 9 194 Proponent: a� -en/ . - 1 Proponent/ Phone: Person completing (Please Print or Type) Address: Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe, No Yes Maybe No Prei 1 .14 3 -84 �J� //_' / SENSKE & ASSOCIATES, INC. form: 4444 . `��q ' ,S ,s4 Phone: CHI, Englneen /Land Surnyon Date: S. 104 Freya bte. 203 Spokane. WA 94202 (509) 534-5272 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: $ staff reyiew of the envi ntal checklist and other pe talent information, the staff: Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recommends /issues a proposed declaration of nonsignificance. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommends /issues a final declaration of significance. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recommends /issues a final declaration of nonsignificant.). EXPANDED RESPONSES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WILDWOOD TERRACE ITEM 1 Earth: The construction of roads and building sites within this proposed subdivision will alter the existing topography of the area. Further, overcovering and disruption of the existing soils will occur. Stabilization of the soils during construction and landscaping of the finished grades upon completion of construction will reduce the impacts. No agricultural soils will be disrupted during the construction of this project. ITEM 2 Air: Additional automobile traffic will slightly impact the site from a microsopic point of view. However, it will have no measureable impact on the metropolitan area. ITEM 3 Water: The construction of roads and housing sites with the normal appurtenances will impact adsorption rates, in some cases negetively and in others positively. "208" Waste Discharge proceedures will be followed to mitigate any potential negetive impacts. All property owners in the plat will agree not to oppose any ULID for storm and sanitary sewers. Water will be provided by the Spokane City Water Department. ITEM 4 Flora: ITEM 5 Fauna: The site will be altered with substantial areas planted in ornamentals. No adverse impacts will occur. Site development will introduce domesticated fauna however no known unique, rate or endangered species will be affected. Undeveloped portions of the project will represent a permanent habitat for many of the existing species already on the site. P E - 1473•84 ITEM 6 Noise: Additional automobile traffic and construction noises will impact the area. Similiar impacts have occurred in this immediate area for the last 20 years without any known adverse impacts and none are anticipated within Wildwood Terrace. Landscaping of the finished site will offer buffers to the ambient noises of the residential subdivision. ITEM 7 Light and Glare: Additional traffic and housing will introduce light to the area. No street lighting will be installed and all area lights will be focussing types to reduce their impact. Landscaping of the finished building sites will reduce the impacts of on -site sources of light and glare. ITEM 8 Land Use: The existing Spokane County Comp. Plan designates this property as being suited to the Urban Category of land uses and densities. The adjacent land has been•'designated suited to Urban densities and all are located within the P.S.S.A.. This development clearly falls within "fill in" category as defined within the Comprehensive Plan as adopted in 1980. ITEM 11 Population: From a microscopic point of view, the proposed subdivision will have some impacts. However, from a macroscopic point of view, the metropolitan region, the impacts are insignificant. The housing units provided here on non - agricultural lands will not be necessary in areas of higher agricultural value, therefore actually reducing the impacts of additional population on our metropolitan region. a ITEM 12 Housi The proposal will affect existing housing to the extent that 27 building sites not presently available will be created. The 27 site represent less than 4% of the annual demand in the metropolitan region. These sites are uniquely situated creating view sites that are not available throughout the metropolitan region. ITEM 13 Transportation: Spokane County Road Standards will be met or exceeded in the construction of this subdivision. Additional traffic will be created in the immediate neighborhood to the extent of 1352 ADT. This increase will be shared approximately as follows: n r _ 1/ 71 _ 5/4 South along Havana towards 17th Ave. - 340 ADT North along Havana towards Pratt Ave. - 505 ADT East along 14th Avenue towards Carnahan 507 ADT ITEM 14 Public Services: All public services will be affected. The cost of public services will be partially offset by additional property tax revenues as well as sales taxes paid both during construction and after construction phases are complete. ITEM 16 Utilities: All utilities will have to be expanded to this site. Storms drainage design will meet "208" design standards. All property owners within the Plat will agree not to oppose any ULID's for storm or sanitary sewers. City water and sewer will be utilized. Annexation agreements will be necessary priori to implementation of these utilities. A decision from the Spokane County Boundary Review Board is pending. PE-1473 -84 Spu'kane County Planning Depai, (ment THRESHOLD DETERMINATION DECLHHRTIOIl OF IlOIISIGIlIFICRUCE RPPLICRTION tt: PE - 147 3- 84 ZONE CLASSIFICATION : ,4j. i - R 4. MPS 1. PROPONENT: GEo & E 29 P5694) Contact Person: /,P2 /KC SEAIS,K 2. COUNTY ACTION(s) REQUESTED: Preliminary Plat Rpproual _ Zone Change 2L_ Change -of- Conditions Preliminary Short Plat Approval Variance Approval Other 3. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: 5 A 4. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Section Township 2.6 N, Ran CA &(/A AA) REVIEW RND COMMENT: If you wish to comment in writing respond as follows : X Response DUE no later than : I!IlTllllllijl'lll!IIIIPROP0SED DECLRRRTIONIIIIQIiiii illll(IiiIIIIIR rci � ,�, Date 7 - /3 - j John Nunnery - Co. SUbdiuision Rdm'r. cnnt-nno rni,ntu, Plnnninn flpnnrtment 3 )95 Public Hearing date is : T/1>c(. 2 3 2,96"J Declaration of Nonsignificancee issued . er da ted be /o T Phone 5 3 1 J - 52 q • (See attached page if checked e 3 EWM, Spokane County, Washington (See attached page if checked 5. COPIES SENT TO : SEE ATTACHED SHEET 6. LERD AGENCY : SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON The Spokane County Planning Department has determined SPOKRNE COUNTY to be "Lead Rgency",pursuant to WRC 197 -10 : X 22Q; 205; Otht 7. THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : This proposal has been determed to not haue significant aduerse impact on the environment. Rn EIS is not required undE RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the County a complete enuironmental checklist and other information on file with the "Lead Agency as prouided in WRC 197 -10 -340 (5), pleas( Spokane County Planning Departmen N. 721 Jefferson SI Spokane, WR 9926( Attn: John Nunnert UIIUIIIIIIIIQIIIIIIIIII FINAL DECLARATION IIIIIUIIIIIUIl1 Date Chairperson of Spokane County Hearir Et{aminer Committ( APPLICATION *: PROPONENT: (30 ).-.. WA State. Department of Ecology (Olympia) 411111111 WA State Department of Ecology (Spokane) ICimo ,: WA State Dept. of Social & Health Services tan► Spokane County Health District 5: jinn School • District4-8 /.. 6 • r ) . : Fire District comb Water District 9� $ 8 �t� Office of the Mayor City of Spokane)•, 9 •C4t*' Spokane County Boundary Review Board 10: .• Spokane City Plan Commission 11,' (44. ) : WA State Parks & Recreation Comm. (Olympia) 12. (43 )'., WA State Dept. of Natural Resources (Colville) 13. :(38 ); WA. State Dept. of Game (Spokane) 14 16 U.S. Housing & Urban Development (Spokane) 15. t®) ' . Spokane County Air Pollution Coitrol Authority 16. t031111 WA. State Dept. of Transportation (Spokane) 17. ). Fairchild Air Force. Base Commander's Office •ATTN: Jim Hall, 92CSC /DEEV 18. (116 .) Spokane International' Airport,.ATTN: Airports 19. (145. ) Town of Airway Heights 20. (146 ) City of Cheney 21. (1471) • City of Deer Park 22. (150 ) Town of Medical Lake. 23. (151.) Town of. Millwood • • SEPA M.\ !LING. LIS cf#11,414 /94"4-L • • Lc. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM ILL SIGNATURE BLOCKS (ON PAGES 2 AND 3) MUST BE FILLED IN, IF APPROPRIATE, BEFORE RETURN ii G TO THE PLAT ADMINISTRATOR. I `y Part I - To be completed by applicant and surveyor &REA AND DISTANCE************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Total amount of land in this Subdivision: r Acres Tot z! Total Number of Lots Proposed density of the Plat: /. P6 w /(4_5-;)es //i./G C ta /� - WA2-)Lots /Gross Acre Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: Acres Proposes Use of controlled adjoining land: What is the driving distance i�qqq to the nearest fire station? / 7 Shopping facii}'�fies? > / Municipal Boundary: p OI Paved street or highway (7 LAND USE********************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Comprehensive Plan Category: Indicate the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings ( ). �, ,/�' Duplexes (I'll • Indicate lots for duplexes: ,GL'S Z, 3 5 S, (. /7 QU1le ez/ f 4 G :lulu-family dwelling units (✓ ). Indicate which lots: ;L? /t / } Mobile Homes ( ). Other ( ). Describe other uses: Describe any non - residential use proposed in the Plat: What is the present use of the property proposed to be platted? List type of uses: Cultivated land: acres. Pasture: Timber: acres. Vacant: L-- acres. Other: EXHIBIT B Is keeping of animals desired? No ( ). Yes ( ). Type: Proposed Zoning:'M,C — 4r4t / ' A2 CI /2 o i3 /A's IMPROVEMENTS************** * ** * * * * * **.J * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ******** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **. Do you plan to file he Plat in its entirety as proposed, or will it be a multi -phase deve- iopment? Ate l7 6 o4AAt -, To what level of improvement will streets be constructed? Gravel ( ) - Minimum. Curb and Gravel ( ). Curb and Paved ( ✓). Paved only ( ). Describe any combinations■of above: ':that is the time period expected for complete development of the Plat: ■ /LA/ /w 4 Street improvements completed? 1 . Substantial number of lots occupied? Is dedication of any land for public use contempleted? (Parks, schools, etc.) ilo. (X). Yes ( ). Describe: acres. indicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: /,.4"1/x" '76'r) Square feet Number of bedrooms Z, Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No ( ). Yes (X ). Will any special deed restric ions be include, in the s4e of/�'ots ?/ No ( ). Yes ). If "yes ", explain: �jm; mere., ! ,,r' /t /rL� , rlptfe Fi-/79 l�cie e-t.- • Estimated Sale Price 4401 t ,j p,— n Acres UTILITIES******************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank ( ). Lagoon ( ). Treatment plant( ). Other, or combinations (Describe) ( ew e b cf Indicate the proposed source of water supply?, Individual wells ( ). Public system ()c ). Cndicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings): Underground utility easements (C). Overhead utility easements ( ). Utilities in streets (» ). No easements ( ). Indicate the distance from this proposal to the nearest existing water main: a;4 f eet . Indicate size of nearest main: i inches. Private community system ( ). C1 -OVER- ' UTILITTFC _ ( Continued)**************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** List utility companies or distr is erected to provide service„to t 's Plat: Electricity: �crl .Gas: �� Water: e{ Phone: ,/Vg/ AC KNOWLEDGmENTS ******** **************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** PROPOSED PLAT NAME : ;,0 ( Z. Q Ll' (i) o (I) T E.e K :i6 C, C I, the undersigned, have completed the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat has been prepared by me under my supervision in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane Count Department and the laws of the State of Washingtin. 9 0 N SA/ 1%.``' a WASHj�c (Signed) �J rt a Y vc ! Date: /6, /9 1 E; 161 Phone: Zip: ° ! • O; (Address) : ; cr ,off, . o .Q r I, the undersigned, 'swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I further swear that I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD of the site proposed as the preliminary plat, or, if not the owner, attached here - with is written permission from said owner authorizing my actions on his or her behalf. I also understand, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack or full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of non significance that it might issue in reliance upon his checklist. C. S NOTARY (Signed) E X U I B I P PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) SENSKE & ASSOCIATES. INC. Civil Engineers /Land Surveyors S. 104 Freya Ste. 203 Spokane, WA 99202 (7U ) 3.54-3 if . J4 I o r (Address) S. 3c3OO9 /LL 2 &'4ifl Date: Phone: Zip: Date: 79203 7A/0(7 (7 Part II - to be completed by water purveyor -- See PART VI A. This subdivision (is) 4a) situated within our service area, B. We are (able) ks.vaismaillstql a nd willing to supply this subdivision with adequate water for (domestic) (fire) ( = 1) uses. C. Satisfactory arrangement (have) rr _t) been made to serve this proposal41 c-Z C D. Signature (only when items A, B & C are true and completed) c( '`"C'l �Ju `G m E. Priv$t (wells) (watqj- system) is saed�(denied) as an interim water source. Lifts u s -L � S (�cT�c6..^Q C ��l.t/7x -w+cti. ?AL- L4,IiiICs 1 / u / U 4,_• n e rs n e lgnature •and title [P\fGc date Page 2 Part II7.to be completed by Health District Akt A. Health District staff hasAcompleted a field investigation of the site. B. Heal District requirements for preliminary plats have (have not) oeen satisfied. PE ° 1413.° 4� (Continued) Page 3 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Part IV - To be completed by County Engineers Office A. County Engineers Office requirements for preliminary plats have (-144.1/41.e -R-9 -0 been satisfied subject to submission and approval of drainage calculations and drainage plan. B. Signature B. Sign ture and Title * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *•* * * * * * * * * * * * * Part V - To be completed by County Utilities Dept. A. County Utilities Department requirements for preliminary plat have (have not) been satisfied. Signature Signatur E X H I B I T A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM and Title _2//0/0 Date * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Part VI - To be completed by County Building & Safety To la - Foil W1u. LTC % - tRfl'.�,y 1.0 tt (Kee 1C Fire Flow of - gallons per minute required for proposal. ?CJ'L.ocroc\ tzd, 4 ..o /io f / sig`Rature and title date .. :: A _ THIS PART TO BE COMPLETED BY SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNINT DEPARTMENT Planning Department Information T t u� <: , 7 7 / ` �7X � 7 /$.5 - Date Submitted: /� g � 0 ni i��? �� j� Preliminary Plat Fee: Z3.0 Date Accepted: Checklist Fee: 40 D6 . Plat File No: ?EE -1 73 -$ Zone Change File No: E-BS —$11- Plat Name: MIt,DW00D rffk RACE Existing Zoning: tq,. Ms4 ,Number of Lots: 27 Date Established: /955 198173 Location: Sec. a 3 T R Li 3 Advertised Zone Change: g-2. , MIFS Checked by: School District: dray Fire District: Water District: Comp. Plan Category: /, t1-479 PSSA bdry: if Stith Akt-d. PUBLIC HEARING DATE: P E1473i4 • , ,71`• . • - 1.4 • •• S 1 i t tin t 4:11P len hihg • D partment - 4c s v - itri.g.., 11111111111 11111111111 1/ • , • s ort0.1 THRESHOL D E T LN -.4 1 ON ' • -•• ,SOP • V ECLIIHEITI011f 'tflflSII5llIFICHh1 - "4&. ; n. • O.:P.A A • A t..r snistp • • •-•! ZONEICLASSIFICFITION CinitAl A A A) . .*•••-•,.• ; rniiilbPbf4ENit:1 Ltreg5 K&C:. Piirai g E - "'4".ity.”, -;'.• • '" .• • - , , • • 2: COUNTY FICTION(i) (;-` ' 1.• Preliminary Plat Rpproual Zone Change Ss- . llanance Approval 4_4 ,eticr " .... Laiar, a i aL 1 41_ ..a4L • % ••• 4.2 .4 Onaa.:. AMVW 4- " . • rriZrjralinirAw tboIif • • f•- - • VDESCRIPTION OF PilOPOSRL:,, ••• "W OODAAVD • (See attached page if checked 1:1 41 OF PROPOSAL: : Section Z'R Township?, N, Ran • I A 2,•/' 4■40t.../, P' • -••••• ,dAr/B4.o-- .• • ■ 9 (See attached page if checked 5. COPIES SENT TO : n'EE A T TA CHED SHEET T •-• : n • " ' — 6. LERO fIGENCY :-% SPDX.A NE - COUNTY, SH. NG TON - - '774.,:; The Spokane County Planning Department has determined SPOKANE COUNiTtecV "Lead ligency",pursuant to MC 197-10 : X 220; -.- 205; 2 Other .,. 7. THRESHOiD DETERMINATION ' :' This pro been determed to not hauea significant adverse impact on the enuironment. fin EIS is not required under • RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after reuiew by the County of • - a complete enuironmental checklist and other information on file with the "Lead Rgencyl..„ REVIEW FIND COMMENT: •• t. tit* you wish to comment in writing as prouided in WRC 197-10-340 (5), plesise- respond as follows : , • 4/ t 7 1 **'/Response DUE no later than : 3 • ;/964 >1T t C Public Hearing date is : AV , 2 3 >29 62 / ay. „ , # ,"'‘...4Declaration of NonsignificanceIssued c ! below .; , • • 1' PROPOSED DECLARATION A j 4 4 er /1A-dif .4.41 Sate I Date 7 hn Nu erg - Co. bdiuision Spokane County Pia Ding Department } • 4r:: • 4 .% -A)sAit- t 4 Preliminary Short Plat lipproua • , 111 111111111111111111111111 e 1 4 - 3 EWM, Spokane County, WashingtonJ , •Pzit÷ • 4 4••••0- Lir Spokane County tr ._ Planning Department' N. 721 Jefferson St. Spokane,- WR 99260t John NunnerYc i01111111111111111111111M N fi L DECLARATION • . , • 4.,1!4...EX-f., • w1 4% '• • 4. 4, • Date Chairperson of Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee 4 11 11 11 1 III 11 111 11 III 1 1 F w nelk i.. p ... ,.".... C,"., • ; Cou.T"ouSC ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST P ELE B 147 SEC /TWN /RNG: 23 -25 -43 Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local`•+`. governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing privatep'; :proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actionsL'i'. _significantly (and "adversely ", as per WAC 197 -10) affecting the quality of the physical environment. "The.1, - 7 purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such 'a = major. action. . 1; Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will 'result. t The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the degree of impact, asking you- for more information, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe ' an explanation would be helpful to government decision - makers, include your explanation in the space'provided, or use additional pages, if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which youii.,, are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will Z? help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review withoutf unnec -r4 essary delay., F _. 1 `y :The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently :.applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which wilUbe., :;caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the Ai 'future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. .4.. 4 No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate ' County department. State law requires explanations for every "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required to provide explanation for "no" answers, and in some. cases, . 4 ., . more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination. =r NOTE:,.This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for * various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. •If a question `. : i does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ' • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ,FORM,,' • . BACKGROUND • , .- Name of Proponent: 2.- Address of Proponent: South 3009 Mt. Vernon 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 7 -10 -R4 ' 4.i Agency Requiring Checklist: Spokane County Planning Department 5. Name of Proposal, if, Applicable: Wildwood Terrace • % Aug u st ; 1 9 81`� Wallace Construction Inc b 535 .- 7619, Phone Number: .Spokane, WA 99203 Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, generaledesign elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Development of 5 Multi- Family (MFS) lots (125 Units) and 22 R -2 Lots (44 Units) in a Divided Duplex Lot configuration allowing single family type ownership of eacPN Side. Some recreational common ownership will be incorporated as shown ontpreliminary • • 7.:;,Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the Proposal, as well'as the extentof :the land,, = area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information give an accurate4 :.o., understanding, of the environmental.setting of the proposal): - . East Of Havana between 13th Ave and 16th on rocky, undeveloped land. This ownership has not previously developed due to lack of available sewer - Partial rehab :of old 8 't ° Es mated Date for Completion of Proposal: 1.985 S '. y YyyA+ -;. r + List of -all Permits, License or Gppvernwgpnt ,Apprgvals RGgpj for ty E the Proposal (f deral lie s u te' ,and . �- local'• including rezones): oundary - eview Board - ut ilixtensions, spokaouhty ;` Engineers- Road /Drainage Design, ''Spokane County Building and Safety- Bui-ldingtPermits 10a”..;: 'Do you, or the owner in the event you do not own the subject land, have any plans for future additions,. - W- expansion, er further activity related to or connected with this proposal? TIf yes, explain. ` 'w- Yes, I hope to develop plan to rehabilitate the adjacent Inland AsphaltIPit'ry site. 2 P [ . 0 147 3 84 10b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this propo al's location? If yes, explain: �LG1 etc /O(4A 11. Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: ,00 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expecr,ted to tref,�f7ied at some future date, describe the /nature of such apJ,ication form: ,S c !SO cP,4dc2/G /- G4Jt u ct.p l ea r v+7 - /2e44 ' II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil ?. . . _✓ _ _ (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features' ✓ _ (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion or soils, either on or off the site ? _ _ ✓ (f) Changes in deposition of erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake" ke /� / .i Explanation: 5 C eat--X e, C'Gc- e' -Z/i 7`p/' Qe ;%. = ; ^Q 2. ' Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: • g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an "'aquifer by cuts or excavations? (h) Deteriorationlin ground water quality, either through direct::_ 'injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, i : detergents,waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances l '' into the ground waters? (1).Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for' public water supplies? 6 Yes Maybe No . Water. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe'tMo Ts ,f 4 (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, • in either marine or fresh waters? • . ?Yµt. (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and - ,amount of surface water runoff? • (c) Alterations to the course or flow of floodwaters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in.any water body' (e).Discharge into surface water, or in any alteration of surface water ; quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? • (f) Alteration of'the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora, and aquatic plants)' (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? ti Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or number of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna? ✓ (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: 6. Noise. Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. (a) Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: (a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned and use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources' Yes Maybe No 8. Land Use. Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource' Explanation: P E 1473 -84 • ;.1.9 1 .*Ze. , ..; • 4' • ...., A i ' -' _ . ,' •; ",, ,,, -. ,..., Arr T. 1/4 * t 1,410. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the Yes Maybe •4,11.1.`t release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, ' I ... pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions' - k;k1.-tr .,.. txpl anati on: .y. P, , . • "7, 1, 0H I • )70 1 1 . Population, Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, • Yes Maybe No "•:72 .: 's or growth,rate of the human population of an area? • _ Explanation: • • .0: U. Housing. 14111 the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for •• 44•7` additional housing? ../,; • , • •, Explanation: • ?5s; • trls 13 Transportati on/Ci rcul ati on. Will the • ...••••• proposal result in: ' ' (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? ., .■....■ r . . • (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, ..or demand for new parking" 4.-•••• al.- .■....■ . s 1 '14 - r . • (c) Impact upon' existing transportation systems? ,N. • Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement ,fil./..c‘' ‘• . of people and/or goods? ., • - ', • •(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail' or airstraffic? ‘,. • (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, . , -, -,,,'.., r • .,„'.,••`. bicyclists, or pedestrians? . . . . . .-4. ........ . .'. • • • •.• • • „<„, , • • Explanation: , .,. • „„••, fit: • Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result • .. ' Yes Maybe , No in a need for new or altered governmental, services in any of the --- . . 4 • Tollowing areas • • ‘• , ,;', < ''4•4`. ' t 4 / 't tr ' ' ( ,` t: I ' HI \ r (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including reads?. . ••• • . (f) Other(t.governrnental services? • ))'•Explanation: • il4k15.k:` Energy. Will the proposal result in: ifIcti"-.• ;Tr • t. ‘"! •••: .,;.• (a) ,Use of al •amounts' offtEtfuel t• 1 'Lsda •.;•• l(b)..Demand upon existing sources of ene the development of new sources of e • . . • f.r • kr. A.C> • z : - c," Yes - Maybe No •0•14 •• • — . • -• ••••• 10••••.-; • .(a) Fire protection? ..... .:`•-• . . ••••.; ........ ,. ....... • •;. . ,--- ' •:lci.-k.-Ii. : . - , . _ ...•-t - V; • (b) Police protection?. . . . . . .i. . .....• . ..... . . . ..... . ... . i•-•- • ,.... • • • • • ..... • • IF • • .01 "•••,"•';,, Yes MaybeJ No • .• • ,•■ • Schools? , et,r- (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? ,• r ki .i• f;;i1 t i■ • ; •;;,,,•...• • • . "M • • rgy,or •requi re .•• • I ... -• • • . no! tr • '"0 t: i• • - `ti •• • (14 •,• •• Mayhe No ,77 norgY?:••, . ..... , ••• • • * •" • ' ••••;•7 • Ti•:,-..;" e-,• -• 1 ' - ' 19 1? ? !4 : 3: 11: " e gtit 11 S Ctl if it ge" I ' it :V; : . . jp,.., ,_ t‘,!,....,., p,in..4•;'44-. • ' tr ..... .;,..• ••,:• 99 C...., . p ItIn p . ' * . -?.,,,,, ,, ,,t4r.-. • '5 :.'ian ri ---,-4 .D.: - St.f4.77 , ii,V.1 . 41vv i ";; ; ;A4,4 4 ,1,.1 i.et 'i. '• "" I . int, • ,.. - r'......;Cftii...ea‘' "- ' ,' <V , . S L .. l" . . - •,,S t ,.? ,444,1S A ....v. '. 4 : r• r' e. . . •,••••. t . let. -.0:•' -akt. ••• -*•• 4- • k 9 . p ' ' „ -1 1` , 1 ;•”_ 4 .9* al k lab ‘ •• re e e . ' " WO .7; ....11. . ..' l'34 1 ;4 '''aLier 1 4 / 1, i i i'P r r ' OA 7 . Jr 4, ..4.1ri 7;Ptil; ..,..... 1 • • r-4 I, ' . ra‘■ •••.' ^ %It.- bs.. i • ., 3 r 1 1'.1 .t.h.. • ,, ttar 11 ititi:Sc't; • '''.. : : .: . • Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems. Yes Maybe No or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communication systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: Yes Maybe No 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazards or potentia health hazard (including mental health)? L, Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No 19. Recreation: Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Explanation: Yes Maybe No 20. Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? . . . _ _ ✓ Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any will- ful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may with- draw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue reliance upon this checklist. Date: ./ t! /// 9.Y `� Proponent: -Le i (/ , Revised:: August, 1981 (Please Print or Type) Address: FOR STAFF USE ONLY Staff Member(s) Checklist: Based on this staff review of the envi • ental checklist and other pe iment information, the staff: A. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recommends /issues a proposed declaration of nonsignificance. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommends /issues a final declaration of significance. C. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recommends /issues a final declaration of nonsignificance. B. Proponent: Phone: // QQ // SENSKE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Person completing form: t /n,et../ t • JUnS Phone: ChM Engineers /Land Surveyors Date: S. 104 Freya Me. 203 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534 -5272 5 j% re:A - 7.ur a .4. PRELIM — P. • • ' ALL SIGNATURE BLOCKS (ON PAGES 2 AND 3) MUST BE 'TT TED IN, IF IF APPROPRIATE, Bk.a.b ORE TOPEELE:PLAnDMINISTRATOR. ' rtc• I ;To be AREeAND DISTANCE”*************” "'" n. 74 ' : ' • t Total, amount;Zof in Total, tthis 'Subdi "ci;:.?• ": - • 443 r Proposed density of the Plat:. ' ,• • Comprehensive*Plan Category: Indi cate the, proposed 'land:use of the plat: Duplexes ( Indicate lots for duplexes: Multi-family:dwelling units ( ). Indicate 0ther. ( ). Describe o •'" . • Describe any combinations of.above:, Describe any' non-residential• use proposed in the Plat: EXHIBIT B 4, a ?,•k,:c4;j; Y PLAT APPLICATION FORM , ;Ft . loctocied. •• • • • • ' •r n • 4 ":' • p completecV applicant . e.t: .1.1 . ; i xt-...., . ,,, ,- :..,.. -A, , . . • ..• ..-,- , .,..,t, ft, a `c . . ■•• • '; ' •,4`. -..:“ ,-, (•••• -'• • .1 ***************;* ?1 • tSr. I., • ,, •• . yision: AY Acres Total Number .onots zg .. ,:. =„,e•ity,=: .•,:=. 4g /47; 7 . • , . .,,,, , , , . 1 • TotaVamount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or 'sponsor: i. . Proposes 'Useoffcontrolled adjoining land: • e • - • .b..; • 1 ../hatcis the .driving distance to the nearest fire station?' Shopping facil& > / Municipal Boundary: 0 01 hi ghway (77 9 %•• • LAND usE*tt*,*********************,i******************,*********** . - . Whattis the present use of the property proposed to be platted? List ;type of:uses: c t Cultivated land: acres. , Pasture:. Timber: acres. Vacant: acres. Other: Is .keeping of animals '.desired? No „( ). ' Yes ( ). Type: Proposed ioning;M:.5" / ..122- at/ o * -617 • •.t,. ' "-• ** ****************4 - +% .ri• • Doi you plan?-.to :file; he Plat in its entirety as proposed, or will it:be "emulti deve-' lopment? ' "--/..40-e• To\what level of improvementwill streets be constructed? . Gravel" ( ' ) ; i *: : Curbr and Gravel ( Paved (t.) Paved only:. .( ). ; "4 • .20'' • ‘• • •• . • . ., , , sk What is the. .time period expected for .' complete development' of' the Plat: ' Street.improvements completed? 17q 4 .‘ Substantial number:of lots occupied? ritrk:),• . . -6, 4-. : ' .:? h • ,, / — , -V . eg.d.. - .d ..l• " .4. . ItryTh; . It • r7). . 1 • 1 Is'cdedication of any land for public use contempleted?, (Parks,' schools, etc.Y ;y ., — • N 61. (IX )';•: -,(act.::.)':,',,:. Describe :. a‘ ' .. ',. :.... • . . k • . ;*'- ;'int,... 1 4,): . .4 ,11 - Indi the size .unitproposed,to be :'constructed: (21-laPtiC !.Squa_relfeetfif. Number o drooms 2, Be :' .... • .t...: Estimated Sale Price . /142,-cp,ifr— e92:?...en7..",,,',[ti",:, 37,ic,>i : ' 1.....}trt + ■ 1 . Will-buildings be built on 'the lots .he fore they are' sold:, . No ( -). , Yes(,)C;)..> .:?, .......:'' ' . - • ' , -,.- . - az . -.... Willira_ny specialifdeed restric ions 'include in the s , ots? .No (G ., ) .' Yes (r?C.f..) i • I fiv,ye s" Xexpla-in:i Zifirt; '' ret .4 ". 44" 5 i4t 1c/ c.it e---are. C...0_,C • - • . , ; 't ''',:".. :% -,,l't,',V •”:. i. .t,,,.;,4:4 ' .,, ,"."0., • ..,,.., t ' , 1 , -,'...-,,` , ,,, i . - $•-•:,,:0, 4 :-,:• i ••••14.0?,M" •,, • i , '•• -;■-• CAI •..: i ,fiC :tNi•-• , , :$ .• ' : ctin • ..Vie)c)474e..42 IR i tfr AYfr:te . i ,...•/:". .. -: . ., . : : ‘ ...' V- " " . -, , —1" :.r- z, .i - , untiTI • ir- ^.., 7 " , Estl,*4 . 40 4,^ i r 1 ".7:e • - Z' ft ' , .. . 4 - • ; ' . l ' h : • • '. i • •-• • .■• •,' •••• , • -•; 7'j •••,• . • - r e -” -,, t I f , • •••• ' ' • >' ' '..;• ...;7 • i ' i - l i,.. ' -• -7":, .—.; :A" kf 1 4 (.. ..r. Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank (..;. Lagoon .01 ; tb•-•- !,, Tr,eatment, p4.ant - z : ::), 'Other, or combinations (De scriberL et ' .---5eto ay wirrircv,...-t-4.4ri, •s:t,,vm., -: • ','.',".:ii;*:i;:!-‘,. , , , ,,,r-.04 : : , :,,-, V. Di • • 4.1 " , t- 4,i. Indicate the proposed source ': of ' water supplyy, Individual ;• wells' ( , :;:,,•:),;., t,„,Publi c , ,..syst • PriVate..community,' „..:•..?,,,r pottset-te- ‘, - ' c it'• 7 "4'7:: t. tf) ....1:14 'iLi .l'fr::;:. . 7 .?. . .,.; Single Family Dwellings f i r /87,t_S I 3 ' ;e ntut7en which lots: ther uses: • ' • . rc ;: Paved. street,for i** • _, • , Utilitiestin streets (,)e )No..easements '( ) -;kt7f-- TURN V'Nk acres.. 2w;•,, • Acres Indicate method 'of' extending service to the . lots (Dwellings): .7 - Undergroundtfttility easements ( );c2ff Overhead utility easements ( - • 4 r 44 54 '4 'proposa2jto the • feet,. . nearest existing waterjmain" inch C s *1" = - ' t1- ' 1• • •: % • 'e° • ' - ` 71°11•1? •• . S i• C ' t i-- OVER • r,% List'utility Electricity: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS * • PROPOSED PLAT NAME: CO -1— EE �CC • I, the 'undersigned, 'have Ary< 'completed the information requested, the Preliminary Plat•'has 'p been prepared by me under my supervision in accordance with the 'requirements'of, ; the Spokanet, Count _z�_ + .�,'. ,, , , 'Depar r tment and the. laws of the State of Washingtin. +' „? . (Signed) , : 4 4 - 0.2 : Date: ee,,PART-.V 1 c NOTARY SESI. :. jnjie ;:'f ..Y ° f Continued crr 'or districte ected Gas: ( to provide service to 't ' Plat ' "" ✓� ` Water: • hone o ) (Address)3n'` & ASSOCIATES. INC.' Phone: Engineers /Land Surveyors'* .- * /tci S.'104 'Freya Ste. 203 Spokane, WA 99202 °`, Zi 17 UV) D3!F -D • I,' the undersigned, 'swear under the penalty. of perjury that the above,.'responsesareiy, made' truthfully and to the best of my knowledge.' I further swear that 'I`AM'THE OWNER LOF RECORD of`the site proposed. as the preliminary plat, or, if not the owner, attached c% with 'is written permission 'from said'owner authorizing my actions on his or her behalf.,` I also understand, should' there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack •or. full, disclosure' on my part,• Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of'•non :sig cnificane ?x thatait_ might issue in reliance upon: his''checklist a ,z,' . "` Signed) �� t - .Date,: *_. , ti �k (Address) `S.'3oo'7 m b r /1Gn, Phone :. ., -.. , Part III ',to be`completed by water. purveyor A.:' This ^subdivision '(is)') situated within our service'area e B. tWe are '(able -1 and willingVto supply this subdivision with' d to v: a equa '( domestic) ( fire )L;rulsstni,i)') uses. C. " Satisfactory .`arrangement (have) - E2r,t) been made to serve this proposal D. Signature (only. when items A,.'B & Clare ..true and completed) E Pr,iv -t '(wells) (wat ,.'.system) i ed (denied);<as an..interim'wa er,°source r w C _ � _ G / :- tL.) U� II,TitS 4 - / j c 4- l y t Part:Io be` completed by Health District i s - . ° t - 1 ' . '4.4 i : .. HealthDistrictstaff has completed a field investigation-of the site .'. } District requirements'; for- preliminary plats have peen satisfied lignature and title 01f c`< - V,rz date:: •, o; , * *', • Part IV -.To be completed by County Engineers .Office ,:`,` County' Office requirements for. preliminary' plats" have - e•o- t)been.satisfied subject to submission and approval of 'calculations : :and drainage :plan, p � B,4 rz .- ":Signature Part 1V'- To be completed by County Utilities Dept • • County .'Utilities Department requirements for?, preliminary •plat have (have not). been satisfied, S , .Signature ` �Y� + s " Signatur:.and.Ti tle' • _ _., :Date`. *. *- • *'' *•. *; *.* * *, * ,-*ti.* * * * * * Part V I - To'be completed by County .Bu i1ding;r&, Safety To , 1 -rC,z- net t A c e; M u. Wirt —t net \cy Are, Yc f•at &o 5� F 1 ow of , - • '" 'gal ions per minute requi red for proposal .4.-+« De -ro.c@ ?-41, • �l ri A Rial? e �. °,- ;v sijRature and title ' . c r,* -'- * * ,* —,• a * .. * -'- . * * _ * •* --T1-1,1,S PART`TO BE COMPLETED•.BY'SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNINT DEPARTMENT; - Planning / Department' Information ` A(- 1.5@yo: ` ,r % PUBLIC' HEARING. DATE: A .. v Date,Submi tted: ,' Date?Accepted : : " =1173 • PaattName • `Wll,l?Woob t kk,AC.E E X H I B I T A PRELIMINARY• PLAT APPLICATION t. (Continued) * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * / 0 / • a ge?s3 Checked'by date:R ,' vo . o�> Preliminary Plat Fee. Checklist. ' Fee:, Zone Change F11 e- 2 c Existing`Zoning: Date Establ Yshed 1555 is ` jcNumberr9 iLots - '� L on': ' Sec S .T 2 ' • School:-•,,;,:, R 3 Advertised Zone Change "`t4 F5 Y , 4.. / $ Astr _ ?� } Di ict .,jr AA r ja ire • District .y' _1 r D Ktstrtct " 3 ' Wate . r;>- Comp..._Raan, Category::- 3 / L- / t i i .- ; "` PSSA -bdry: " ' It • A. Project Name: L1 r , i- \' - PROPOSAL Number of Parce1s: 2 Sect. ion i T. •e; N. H. -y3 E.W.M.; Quarter 1 2 3 4 DEVELOPER N I I : /l jrr > a "`I`l ( - -1)T1 or Address: 5l�y /�i °7 / AGENT Triune : Business S' -7 / ; /cf' Ilume Az' 5 -7`5(2 ) 'OWNER ENGINEER C. INSPECTION D. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: E. FINAL PLAT CHECKS S P O K A N E C O U N T Y E N G I N E E R ---PR E 1. 1 N I N A R Y C O N S U L T A T I O N - - - Name: Address: Phone: Business Name: 5`ilv.7.=4e - L 45SOc Address: Phone: Business B. PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION: Date: 7 / /° ./ t( By: Preliminary a) Right -of -Way 0 a Conditions b) Curb Ye 5 � A l k- Cir 104. d) Pave c% . c an I T walk N s: ( G T L� ;dk I A c i e) Approaches Kawvt's �t:1u_�a,�yt f) Drainage 2° ' An Tis g) State /City Review Yes ( ) No ( ) • Remarks: AI, 0 2. -ubt ;c- Koi,d3 y` /c4Z- /4cc- NOTE: This proposal must.comply with Spokane County Regulations for Roads, Ap- groach and Drainage in New Construction; Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 - 1592 as amended. Conditions are preliminary and may change after field in- _ . spection and review of County records. Date: Remarks: By: Fee Paid: Yes No Amount $ Cash Check Planning Applicattun Signed: Date / T By: % F c- FOi - y e i< L ,��tie%i�.l.v�vizy 67 / Fee Paid: Date Amnuut Check Mathematical & Surveying Checks: No. 1 Date — By _ Ni. 2 --- - -' - -- Date -- - - -- -- Ity. ----. Nu. 3 Hat - -- _ .. By.. - ---- Add 1 t ' anal mat hcmat Ir:11 . and :;111 v 1 "v lu Ch,•,.ks: '.,,. 1,11,• by 1.11, .. ..... h - t _ - Ii.11. RV j Ii it i. -. - 1f" Home Home 5ta( c , Cash A . 61 1 .1',I. . - . ... . Ahi1 . e. Ut . A 1'1 . I11 .\ ni 1 . .\ DI • 1. i • • 1 211 2- Proposed density of. the Plat: Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: Proposes Use of controlled adjoining land: What is the driving distance i miles to the nearest fire station? 1q Shopping facil' ies ?' j / /yU� Municipal Boundary: highway (7) Indicate the proposed source of water supply Individual wells ( Private community system ( ). et ° 6z1 tere'e-`e Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings): Underground utility easements (X:). Overhead utility easements ( u t t ( -- ) casements sements ( EXHIBIT B P4.4MOsa LM»Y' `»EVELAPnIEA,)j PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM ALL SIGNATURE BLOCKS (ON PAGES 2 AND 3) MUST BE FITTED IN, IF APPROPRIA'T'E, BEFORE RETURNING TO THE PLAT ADMINISTRATOR. Part I - To be completed by applicant and surveyor AREA AND DISTANCE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * ** * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * * * ** // //S Tetal'amount of land in this Subdivision: �7 — • Acres Total Number of Lots z �. G to ?�4 Sites ` G ( // Z 7,Sots /Gross LAND USE* i*************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **,* Paved street or Acre Acres Comprehensive Plan Category: Indicate the roposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings ( ,r )• Duplexes ( - Indicate lots for duplexes: lei& a, 3 G 2 thrn `�' Multi- family dwelling units ( i) Indicate which lots: /t Mobile Homes( ). Other ( ). Describe other uses: Describe any non - residential use proposed in the Plat: What'is the present use of the property proposed to be platted? List type of uses: Cultivated land: acres. Pasture: acres. Timber: acres. Vacant: .L.iy -n- acres. Other: Acres Is keeping of animals desired? No ( ). Yes ( ). Type: Proposed Zoning: MI S -- I /' / ' £ Q// o ,d /• 's IMPROVEmEI` ITS**** * **. ********** * * * * * *a 4 * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** entirety as proposed, or will it be a multi -phase deve- u/l s *<• Do you plan to file he Plat in its lopment? fad %i - "Agee To what level of improvement will streets be constructed? Gravel ( ) - Minimum, Curb and Gravel ( ). Curb and Paved ( Paved only ( ). Describe any combinations of above: - / What is the time period expected for complete development of the Plat: .�+ l / rho .rt/' Street improvements completed? .. / 1 , 74.1. Substantial number of lots occupied? far/ Is dedication of an public land for pubic use contempleted? (Parks,. schools, etc.) No. (2C Yes ( ). Describe: ��//Ii Indicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: '!( -"/00 Square feet Number of bedrooms Z, • Estimated Sale Price /f�Q. — dreaGrY' : Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No ( CX ). Yes ). Will any special deed restric ions be includ�e �in� the s4e of ots ? No ( ). Yes ( c ). t "yes ", explain: z; / ecrCQ I i/Ci.I/ ,S rr,/n9 /C .c' .c -»2 /C, 4 e Ft Ld cJev - UTILITIES* "***************************************************** ** * *** ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * *. Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank ( )• Lagoon ( ) . j Treatment plant ( ). Other, or combinations (Describe) 04 i Scecrr r Sy5j`�sfl ). Public system (?c ). tiliti.es in ., reets Indicate the distance from this proposal to the nearest existing waiter main: f-4:(. is eec Indicate si: o;E nearest main: inches. -OVER- JTILITTRS _ (Ccnti_u_.:, List utility ccccar.;_s Electricity: (. ' SURVEYOR'S SEAL: NOTARY SENT,: 1* *T** *** (Signed) NOTARY C. Sig . tue l Foam (Continued) ed t provide service to t s Plat: Water: ( ev Phone: , f •F+* ** *** *M #*** *** * ** 44n ►t*. ** ****Tli 4Y *T4 4-r ia- Page 2 ACKNOWL= { 'ilc /� � PROPOSED PLAT - ii '.t_J o C) Vi i) 7 C E `9 I, the nn %•:r• _,,,,: ;, ;:, c ::pieced the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat has 'been.crc ared ty me 1.n.ier my supervision in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Planning ::art, -ant and the laws of the State of Washingtin. (Sided) Date: (Address) Phone: Zip: I, the undersigned, 'swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I further swear that I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD of the site proposed as the preliminary plat, or, if not the owner, attached here- with is written permission from said owner authorizing my actions on his or her behalf: .S also understand, should there' be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack or full , . disclosure on my part, Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of non significance ,that itimight issue in reliance upon his checklist. (Address) S, 300•,/21 !/P!/IQ�I Phone: zip: 9920. Part II - to be completed by water purveyor -- See PART VI A. This subdivision (is) 4. t) situated within our service area. B. We are (able) •(^gem and drilling to supply this subdivision with adequate water for a., _,. a.. _ (domestic) (fire) (;^ r) Vi ) uses. C. Satisfactory arrangement (have) been made to serve this proposald-1 -L '� r' D. Signature (only when items A, B & C are true and completed) " "'l " E. Priv.te (wells) (water system) is wed (denied) as an interim water source. ( ;TT d Q (.1 z t rzr (0 Disi,ii r . , 7 / IO / \ - . py ie �rs n signature •and title U,0 fir date Part IIIfo be completed by Health District . i Ake A. Health District staf hasncompleted a field investigation of the site. B. Heal 'r District requirements for prelm; nary plats havet(have not) �oeen satisfied. ir k - si '&tore and ysimae ........ 4*** T ..T.........T**** ** *T.....*** ** ......TT TT.T..T......T.... Date: 7f(0.3 Date: 7 /eV *** ********* *** T #1ii! # B. Si'�fia*ure B. Signature Sirn,a'ture and Title . ' u 1 T A APPLICATION FORM ,Continued) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -;; be completed by County Engineers Office Cor „ t ;.r's Office requirements for preliminary plats have (hzu-e .._) ;, . subject to submission and approval of drainage • Calculatians and drainage plan. Date * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Part V - To be completed by County Utilities Dept. A. County Utilities Department requirements for preliminary plat have (have not) been satisfied. Number of Lots: Location: Sec. Signature and Title A. Fire Flow of Date Submitted: Date Accepted: Plat File Plo: Plat Name: R School District: Fire District: Water District: Comp. Plan Category: PSSA bdry: Checked by: / / Date * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Part VI - To be completed by County Building & Safety gallons per minute required for proposal. Preliminary Plat Fee: Checklist Fee: Zone Change File No: Existing Zoning: Date Established: Advertised Zone Change: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Page 3 signature and title date • .. .. .. .. .. .. • .. .. :. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. :. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. * * * .. .. * .. ., * .. .. THIS PART TO BE COMPLETED BY SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNINT DEPARTMENT • Planning Department Information DATE ACCOUNT OR INVOICE NO. RECEIPT Date 77/0 19 a' %912 1 � ,/ Received From 1440 c/✓r.epc/ E5 • Address Dollars $ 335A,4. For {�p EA; vil A (h� P iQt % LIAO LOCOCA T Q.AC f "e 4 h . M4 4 r ye ACCOUNT IIOW PAID . I•� ^ " •. " ; - }]p.S: ... < \.:.',. i . T. ALIT. OF ACCOI)NI CASH .L^ p.5 / I - .. .. . ,. ;:.•. .. .•.• By - y " � k� AM L PAID - CHECK MONEY ORDER . BALANCE DUC DATE ACCOUNT OR INVOICE NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DISCOUNT OR ()EDUCTION NET Amour, f "e 4 h . M4 4 r ye THOMPSON ENTERPRISES, INC. • WALLACE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. • EAST 518 HIGH DRIVE (509) 535 -7619 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99204 • • PAY =� . Errk TO THE ORDER OF • PB Spokane Main Office I lMbonY Bait Spokane, Washington 9 20I • J � ar 000157 Le 1 :L251000341:00 La» 3 7 4111 911' DATE tn'v A M O U N Oas 1571 28- 3/1251 Af f •P A V •E E EMPLOYEES NAME am Pon PAY PERIOD HOURS ENDING REG..1 0 8K808 (€aPO4S1® DETACH THIS STATEMENT BEFORE DEPOSITING RATE GROSS EARNINGS EMPLOYEE' THIS IS A STATEMENT OF OUR EARNINGS AND DEDUCTIONS FOR PERIOD INDICA Airs m Y , . •ttiRlkbF- n kfa'.�. 44664 r..B?c.2s..:s.:‘; THOMPSON EN1ERP RISES, INC. WALLACE CONS1RUCEION CO., INC. NET EARNINGS PAID E11 1Hi IDR .(f!R PI:RN.PNI:N: HLCCRO y M • 1 ., t L . .p IL y Il ff /4DAM S qH C LARt Gentlemen: GSN/set Attachment 5/30/4 Thank you. 1 k) IJ X'lry Sincerely, )1 COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT 5. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER Ss'o►cja AVA.siuvurus 992( - RE: rn ;IA e, '' J RE/4404/r4T tLAnl A review of the road, drainage, and 'parking plans lor the above-refer- enced plat, short pLat, binding site plan, and /or building permit has been accomplished. Areas of concern to us are indicated in red on the attached prints. Please make the corrections and resubmit them to this office in order that the review process may proceed. When the plans are resubmitted, mark all changes on the revised print in color. if you have any questions about this review, please contact us at 456 -3600. Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Gary S. Nelson, P.E. Planning Engineer Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane. Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3600 '. ir e 131 1G NSKE & ASSOCIATES, INC.' South 104 Freya Suite 203 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99202. (509) 534 -5272 ' 4.- . to I/d - I — 't - 6 • • J B , SHEET NO or CALCULATED BY • ' `DATE CHECKED BY - F DATE SCALE ' T-- R —_ I I , ._:_.:__ ,.. 10 = en zox4r.ite) % co AM/ ;,fig - o. w ..I 1 .._._... I t • • DATE s — /s 3 JOB NO. 6 -ea iliPMIMMII RE: Minertil TO ADAMS & CLARK, INC. W. 1803 Maxwell SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 Phone 328 -5853 eo REMARKS /117// 7{fcrrnn/ TX 29ZD/ WE ARE SENDING YOU ' Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter MOW tat (n s / be. Da Nan 01471. ❑ Prints ❑ Change order /COPIES //f,ve S sWkr. ' /44740,✓ FA-' DATE Six -a NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested '. For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections 19 ,4o,rn /h,.#74 /j e 6a--s yo e(. /� 7 S ttr any ,fl7 u� ✓s � 4v2, /P�� / G'�../czf 6Jri/ irae / 77.40,c-Vic.-./s- V -- COPY TO If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. CrP1 N % Cminty Engineering EUUEGD3 Oo CF 4MM t OTTa SIGNED: 1 •---I- `1 the following items: ig Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications 0 ❑ Resubmit • copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN - TO US CEIVED -kL , MIA' 15 9. .4 tat! ON cf .:14TH AVE 1 ' ;te a 1i 0;� #3 c 9Tr. AYE., • n ATT nvf P1UTL.AVE G Un • I:.Ti:,6', a 3( < 1 � • l' �. I ' •Isle L. ' •• " i . . .. •� M1 , :. _ _ : 1 0T A — _;el; l.e 14 TH•v1 1 I. 1 1 .N 41 )1 j T 1, n .•( . C, AL:,, TNLAND \REHAptILITATIQN QEVELOPcED BY , 1 fir r0 i S bIH .7 WA LACE CONSTRUCTION � - 8tALE 1' -�4Q' r ^ t r.. c . • 11 ! 5 ' P' f. • • / • 33 o t .' s. 7 ;p i > > -5 2 l ( A - 5 v - 0,6 y 175 \- s gi &, & ett r I �- �,. % 18 sicecr �. /2a14 2° . 23 IS FURNISHED FOP �Y PROPERTY j: [ Ek?i MI:Si a 1'�fiS SK ONLY TO AS GU SAN, DET MiNEcACRE.A^ : irt ORM."T!ONA' Pi RP)SES J•. .P.;'i • it ( :G 1 l i6_ir., ;Pk. Pir; f.,14,iPPNY 1 14 4 _ c RU ' 3 30- P boring experience. But for Ernie Swanson. driving lately has been far y night to his home at 00906 20th Ave. in the Valley. Swanson's 1976 .e garage. it burst into flames. destroying the car. It was in excellent May to September and then we put it away." Besides damage to the :o the house. The automobile was a total loss. issues to appear !rat election ballot •e : !wilt rcrnodeling of .,.y uistrc• .n!dine and a le addition te thy high e recr.:n;::eniauons for the •ere d eloped by a 39- CItt,:• n committee that iriependent of district ad- irs. :AFF BULLETIN. Gardner campaign to push for bond a flawless promotion." but that - we were bucking. abler over ‘which we had no forring to `ears of district r future sewer 3S- "I a,c p: ospeet ul et en x bills. issue. if passed. would in- E; by $2 75 per $1 .non of as tarty value annually nuw and the No !i gem yen datee Gardner said. the 111 be makin_ an effort to atria ■othrS 1111,;h for the ate. stress the fact that the )OSal c iitiaery rt_inated •n an administrative deck continue to point out that now tc;!!i prevent costly gents u'. :he future. Superintendent Ed 4 rbread 5 hes 6, cool entral Valley High being invited to stop :td teachers. Coffee rooms will begin at ieet ey High School are :g set for Tuesday, .a, W VI ?S Principal High Low 80 S3 66 49 60 41 50 42 52 38 55 • 28 58 39 he Weather Ser- gh temperatures Bach into the 70s, r 30s. Jenkins said the EV school hoard opt- ed to come back in November with a reduced bond issue because of feel- ings that there is plenty of support for the district's two priority items— the remodeling of the high school and Otis Elementary — but less enthus- iasm for some of the "extras" of the first proposal. THE BOARD AXED $2.2 million from the initial proposal and will ask for $9.8 million on Nov. 6. Items scratch- ed from the ,.proncsnl.- , 1 .^ . - e include asphalting and work on roofs and fences throughout the district. The November request. if granted ij> vt tern. would provide for the addi• tionof 10 new classrooms at the high school, along with construction of a new math and science wing and remodeling of existing labs, Jenkins explained. Extra space will be need- ed. as the district plans to move ninth grade students into the high school from the two junior highs. Otis would be in for a total remod- eling. Jenkins said. a move that pro- jects to be cheaper than the building of a new facility. Half of the school would be done at a time. he added. so classes could proceed as usual. The superintendent said the dis- trict will be pushing the fact that $7.4 million in state matching funds have been guaranteed if the district approves the $9.8 million in bonds. If the Nov. 6 issue is approved. tax rates will increase 11.53 per $1,000 of property value. Had the Sept. 18 issue been authorized. the jump would have been $1.94. One suspect arrested Two minor females —one 15 years old. the other 17 — were raped Sun - day in separate instances, and in one case a suspect has been charged, ac- cording to a spokesman for the Spo- kane County Sheriff's Department. Lt. Norm Nickerson. a detective with the department, said names of the victims will not be disclosed due to their minor status. but he did in- dicate that both girls are Spokane Valley residents. Arrested Monday afternoon was Jerry McIntosh. 26. of E7314 First Ave.. on one count of first- degree rape. Nickerson said a 15- year -old re- ported to authorities that she was forced to go to the Red Top Motel on East Trent at approximately 2:30 a.m. Sunday by a male subject armed with a handgun. She was held until noon Sunday, when the suspect let her go; she then notified the Sher- . ill's Department. Developer stirs wafers by talk of building Iak€ Human ingenuity knows no bounds, as county planning commis- sioner member Richard L. Skalstad is finding out. A Spokane real estate developer. George V. Thompson. wants to build a lake in the Valley — a lake ringed by multiple - family residences. Any- one believing there aren't any places ready -made for a lake in the Valley is not familiar with the varied terrain we are blessed with. But Skalstad's problem is that as a member of a special planning com- mission hearing board, he doesn't think his group has been given the answers to all the questions he has been asking. As a result, he has fired off letters to Gov. John Spellman. to the Spo- kane County commissioners, to Wal- ly Hubbard, County planning direc- tor, and to state officials suggesting that these worthies have been less than diligent about doing their duties. which involve protecting the public's interest. SPECIFICALLY, ATTORNEY Skal- stad doesn't think that John Nun- nery, a member of the county plan- ning department. has been entirely straightforward with answers to Skalstad's questions. Skalstad also has sent letters of protest to Sheri Barnard. a member of the Spokane City, Council, and to State Rep. Jean,Silver, suggesting that they,also make some investi- gations -into the matter which has been bothering him. City hall was called into the matter because the proposed real estate development abuts the city limits and will seek to get water and sewer service from the city utilities. Skalstad finds himself concerned with the unanswered questions since he was named to serve as a member of the hearings examining the lake proposal. Normally. Jane Myers. the planning commission chairwoman. L iL uecauae she - is in the real estate business, she asked to be•excused from partici- pating in the hearings. ,TISI ZONE CHANGE request came frotn Wallace Construction, •Inc., S3009 Mt. Vernon, Spokane, to change zoning for some 118 acres of land on the north side of 13th Avenue. just east of Havana, from Agri- cultural to R -2 and Multiple Family Suburban for subdivision of 14.5 acres of land to be known as Wild - wood Terrace into 27 lots for 22 di- vided duplexes and five multiple - family structures. The land upon which the resi- t dences would be built surrounds a mammoth natural pit, surrounded by precipitous basalt rock walls around' most of the perimeter. Pre- sumably. the low portion of the walls would be built up to keep the "lake" water contained. At present. the deep hole is dry. The hearing examiner committee composed of Jerry Williams. Ron McVicker and Skalstad heard the case for .the zone change. but sue- Valley girls raped Nickerson added that the victim knew her assailant and had volun- tarily been with him prior to the time of the reported rape. Later that day, a second sexual as- sault took place. Nickerson said a 17 was reportedly traveling east on 1 - be- tween Flora and Barker roads Sun- day afternoon when her car stalled. Three subjects. one white female and two white males. stopped to help. The two males reportedly got into the vic- tim's car and took her near Rath - drum, Idaho. to a residence. Nicker- son said. The victim's guess is that she arrived there at 4:30 p.m. or 5 p.m. and was held all night during which time she was raped by both suspects. She escaped at 6:30 a.m. Monday morning while her assailants slept. Both suspects are described as white males in their early 20s. one about 6 feet tall, the other a couple of inches shorter with a heavy build. gested that there were some unan- swered questions which should be ex- plored further, and set another hear- ing for Oct. 2, at 9 a.m. The decision was carried over be- cause of concerns that owners of adjacent lands have expressed dis- approval as a change from their ex- isting life styles: incompatible land - uses: issues regarding rehabilitation and operation of the gravel pit: exist - ance of improper fencing: operation of a pit within 1,000feet of residential development: traffic: fire pro- tection: "foot -in- the - door" for other development; vacation of roads: who pays for the cost of improve- ments: value of new houses, and vacation process for dedicated roads. SKALSTAD TOOK IT upon himself to inspect the area personally. It is somewhat hidden from public view. He was accompanied by Nunnery. who had approved the request for the zone change. The hearing examiner was irri- tated to find that not all of what Skal- stad deemed pertinent facts were given to the hearing examiner com- mittee. In the first place, the request for zone change was for 14.5 acres of a total of 116. Further. says the irate Skalstad. Nunnery had represented in testi- mony before the hearing examiner committee that Thompson did own the land in question, but actually had only an option to purchase. and that was contingent upon getting favor- able zone change. , 6 TN A v l u J 4 2 4 Z In his letter to Hubbard. Nunnery's boss, Skalstad protested that "Mr. Nunnery's conduct is so distortive of the fact- finding process that the integrity of the hearing process has been corrupted." What•s more said Skalstad. "1 will not from this point forward accept Mr. Nunnery's presentations as a ba- sis for fact- finding in subdivision or zoning hearing examiner hearings. I hereby respectfully request that for the duration of my 16 -month appoint- ment remaining that Mr. Nunnery not present 7efore in any capacity, including continued hearings on Wild wood." SKALSTAD'S LETTER to Barnard asked that she get an opinion from city plan staffers as to whether fill- ing the pit with water is safe consid- ering that it is contemplated that 1,352 units will be built around it. Barnard told Skalstad she thought that a city plan official. Lyle Balder - son. had informed state agencies of the problems. and said she would have a report at the Oct. 2 hearing. The two-page letter to Gov. Spell- man was concerned that "To date, no state agency has even made a deter- mination of whether an environ- mental review should be made of this project, let alone a determination of whether an environmental impact statement should be required." Nunnery explained to Hubbard in an interoffice memo that he was mystified that Skalstad short! displeased with him. "During the middle of my presentation from the staff re and associated slides. Rich stadt asked questions regar land 1 responded to his c tion. which was apparently not he was asking. and attempted to vide an answer— I became conf as to what he wanted to know ar withdrew his question. and appe. to be upset. A 10-minute break taken in the hearing at this point I went to the HEC conference roo see what his question was. Rich . cated he was upset and did not to discuss the matter. At this poi still have not been able to talk Rich. and am not clear as to wh: is concerned about. '1 AM HOPEFUL THAT he and I sit down and talk through this ter. It is my personal opinion tha have some kind of informatt misunderstanding . . Skalstad says it is seldom members of the hearing comm: examine the documents in a file taining to zone change requests cause of lack of time. He said feel they have to rely on the plan: department staff to brief them or facts in the matters before them. presume that all the pertinent f have been presented. In this case. Skalstad said. cause he was not satisfied with nery's presentation. he did elan the file, discovering the magna of the project being proposed any particular problems associated Ale ott Sc hoo r 1 0 4 I ) TH aI it "The citizens at the hearing Aug. 23 wanted to know where water Ito fill the pit' for this new I will come from and where it will c had hoped that someone from the partment of Ecology would testif; this. The citizens wanted to know was safe to fill an abandoned mfr operation. and whether Inland phalt did not have a prior st; seding obligation to reclaim this under state law and prior zoning ditions of approval. I had ho; someone from the Denartmen! Natural Resources could testify this. "CITIZENS WANTED to know if 1.352 units will slide into the 'la because of the unstable earth cot Lions and change in ground wa flow. 1 had hoped that ecology, n ing, and water people could si some light on this concern." 51 stad complained. In his letter to the governor. SI stad said: "1 have in the past se your transportation people rely lessly pursue hearings when a n truck -stop was impacting an 1 interchange. yet in a proposal t entails a potential 1.352 units 4.056 people abutting I -90, your tra portation people do not appear." Skalstad also was angry becai of failure of the hearing committe, Wit 5 r strategies rs your way Ed Nov. 6? pleof philo- s. When it Iley or the alive Dis- have a Val - presenting the court - ?stepFurth- the Valley ste a com- ict. 1 don't unable or o split the o; we have South Hill. verything T. I'd work oundaries. + issues for. _ti(f Hospit- for the rest CAbpbpthat and taxpayers. l;UU11I )' 'k she.party parks. Something has to be for you In done to turn that situation Shepard? around. You just can't to welcome close the door on county nd his sup- parks. You can't turn off our camp. maintenance operations. o welcome You can't just sell 'em all , in who be- off. sues we're With the substation, the ay at. When sheriff says that he never wesent peo- has enough money to just repre reopen it. rats once Well, it's always going to You repre- be a matter of priorities. Iple. Were Obviously. one of my top ?s from He- priorities is•going to be as much as reopening the Valley sub- :e 'cm from station. The commission- ers don't write the sheriff's budget, but they approve it. 1 would make a spirited and personal appeal to the sher- iff. I'm sure his position isn't poured in concrete. 1 can't buy, from sound busi- ness standpoint. that its more economical to be run- ning those deputies and their vehicles back and forth, all across the county. What about the state - ntentsthat the primary vic- NO Oil P0117 RtOU,RED AUL RENT PAID ARAMs 10 PUNCHASI ERIE ROUTINE MAINTENANCE CALL AND RESERVE YOUR INSTRUMENT WHILE THE SELECTION 15 BEST I to uccu pit Nut Inn self for 20 years or more to run for public office. With my educational back. Developer stirs water > Continued from Page 1 be informed that Gary Myers, husband of the plan- ning commission chair- man, was involved in arranging for the sale of the property in question. Last Friday, Skalstad re- ceived a letter from County Commissioner Keith Shep- ard saying he had reviewed his complaints and that he had requested that Hub- bard have "that person who will be presenting the . Wildwood Terrace appli- cation have the applicant at the outset of the public hearing make a part of the record any interest which Mr. Myers may have in the project." Hoffman Music Co. the Inland northwest's oldest b largest musical Instrument store. DOWNTOWN LOCATION VALLEY LOCATION W. 904 let Avenue S. 110 Pines Road 1509) 458-2714 1509) 458 -2748 P.O. Box 1083, Spokane. WA 99210 AND INSTRV !� RENT ► PROOF; i1 p 1 1 RENTING FROM HOFFMAN S IS AS EASY AS ONE... TWO.. , THREE tow RENTAL RATES —1 \ PICK UP INSTRUMENT AT YOUR CONVENIENCE 3 aull 111\ I t'YJCD dCt'lll'ulllg (0 Superintendent of Public Instruction guidelines, in- surance benefits to $179 per month; four voluntary days during the school year; to place in the agreement that an automobile is a condition of employment for tax pur- poses, and an opportunity to participate in the Asso- ciation of Washington School Principals salary insurance and VEBA pro- grams. Initial item of business was approval of the "con- sent" calendar, those Items routinely put before the board dealing with every- day workings of CV's ad- ministration. Among them were a lengthy personnel report that includes re- quest for retirement of longtime Central Valley High School teacher Mary Zografos. Several gifts were ac- cepted, including $4,000 for playground equipment at Opportunity Elementary and some $260,000 in grant TOP QUALITY INSTRUMENTS 'INSTRUMENT MAY RE RETURNED AT ANY TIME NOW YOU'RE READY TO PLAY _ J uert•lupmellla IIII'IUUIIIg staff development, curricu- lummodel implementation and substance abuse and ' drugs and alcohol pro- grams for students. Assistant Superintendent Charles Stocker reported that class loads at the elementary schools were within student - teacher ra- dio guidelines. Old and new business items included policy read- ings for several areas. in- cluding school facilities, evaluation of the superin- tendent, authorization of signatures, accepting grants from public and pri- vate sources and notice and conduct of budget hearings. STI All si and t type Br'Inl save chec our Our New Outlooks Club" will gi• on what a checking account car banking, because it's our Brand E BANE 9 SPOK ter,. oq Your ucauy 0. ..0 6w o 1 i °�j t` S 0. L (/ � VICINITY MAP Y - AVE- 1 k 11 2 LO 111 11 AVE AVE 3O.___ y ■ AVE r ~ e • _ .._ _ . _. — 1 - ,1 6;t7f i ..r-. ___ • 'R TaivE _ �j■, Sher dan Sch 6 �1 ST - - -- 1 2 / 1 i ! iI +�- �/929 • BTH 1 98 « LJ :AVE ``� �-. • N CO AF 24407 z U Q M (1) N RS -c � U cy J C . U • C) LL! c0 2 V J cn z z J Z 0 1- J w cc 1 SHEET of 1 GEORGE V. THOMPSON WO # 86 -027 BLF 3 10 i1. I � 2 •nin 210' T50 T j 210' rri 100' THIS I3 TO CERTIFY THAT THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT WAS PREPARED FROM EXISTING SPOKANE COUNTY RECORDS AND DOES NOT REPRESENT AN ACTUAL SURVEY i 3 Lna 3 m BL L in Sch - ::i! 29TH. ': 220 ' 2 i / X143 T.tnco T?eighLS �; aR ! Reservoir ,... 20TH AVE L ri,e -in frail _ , East i $ )okan' Trea Park „W = t py Pratt Sch o� . 6TH '� I AVE ' = 4_ ±2 n 5_) .Weit , V u ' II : , . Eng1B rood ,H stor cal Cert1 ._ �IMgrium_nt = Y li A PROPOSED ZONING — MFS R2 NOTE: ROADS VACATED PER PLAT REQUEST LLOYD 13th. TO 14th LLOYD 15th. TO 16th DEARBORN 14th . TO 15th sEr�s & ASSOCS eNC. PHASED DEVELOPMENT REQUESTED CivilEngineer urveyo rs S. 104 Freya Ste. 203 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-5272 AF 24407 DENOTES PROPOStD CONTOUR ( L$C1.1 E 1 H dr. vERr, Ij. AVE _ • • 11 F " \`V — I I) 2D II I) AV I '. � c - If �� a I ti VICINITY MAP C.iN 1� ' - 7TW. S eridAn Sch ° 6 TH T • 2000 24 /5 20 /D - 20070 1 1 11.1. 1 ® •• AVE • • _ _ I LI 22 11 1 �^ , 928 _ 8TH , 9.313 23 y _ Alcoa AVE ' T . _ -- — „Ari j. 4TH =c 0 U'.Gra Waiel Tanl 2000 2000 lea: p SHEET 1 GEORGE V. THOMPSON WO # 86 -027 CrlC) AF 24407 CNI CO 6 tE PRATT" -- 1//4-501 ,yofz. E veitz 2070 Exisr. G Q 10 2050 7 -- 2-/ Sea, 6 (ry•) {- 0030 VICINITY MAP a _ p l - CJ 6TH 20/0 ,• 20075 • AVE ®� LZD ' N • y AVE 1 r. \ { 7:rt 1IL M1•G 2 . 1929 J _ _ 8TH X938 23 .. 11 l a — e Akotr • ' -�` x l , • 0 --Seh •.G : :: 2 ... Pi ravel' I _ AVE I / —~ :• v - Gr el': 0 . C Q.1. ■ •. / GQ _ 2 .-- 1 . � �' AVE l }• .- \ -- =�__ / A 0 �.��• I; 14T i \ VE Wa 20 LU Z 2 SHEET 1 F 1 GEORGE V. THOMPSON WO # 86 -027 BY BY REVISED DATE REVISED DAT E • N 257,000 N 256,0c0 N 254 ,000 N 253,000_ N 252,000 0 0 0 of co co w N 1/2 Sec.26 T25N R43E C8 N 255,981.27 E 2,859,337.57 C9 N 252,816. 42 E 2,859,190. 40 • � 2 /.. MAVE -- BM60 ;f EpY928. r ._ x S TI-ink AVE. -0-, 7 4 PRATT A 228/ 2286) 1 23/7 c C 1/4 Cor. N 256,603.50 E 2,859,300.23 26 232/.4 lc I/4 Cor. N 251,317.15 E 2,859,537.89 0 0 0 0 t0 O N w y x /9305 x , �- 193c 1.9 Compiled by : WALKER ASSOCIATES, INC SEATTLE SPOKANE -0-- ALCOTT SCHOOL 0 0 0 c0 o N w MATCH TO SHEET NO, 23 N 0 0 0 w 2//9.5 sir 11111111D11 • - B M C7 2101.83 W.L. /997 0. + 0 / fl © x 2298 f, 208/.5 23/7 20995 N. x2082 X03/.5 I I '' diI P VC? 0 `\ 3 H 1— 2 \ .'2022. TENNIS x x 22/9 2/8/.5 222/.5 22/75 x 2203 x x 2206 i11 C x /943 /946.5 x x 1937 /9255 9(P 2 052 2 /962 5 . x X098.5 /986 19855 /993.5 /988 X 523/2 21/8.5 2011 ol, x _ 2048 X x/9375 _ I — r te —, �( 1 I I III I HI L II r l 1�3 \ w� p /942 II � ( j110 r /9375 i 1 I L--� x /938.5 r2/91 x 2/ u1 voted) A rea QQ X e � 0 0 0 N (0 Co N w OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY , WASHINGTON i 1 ! i r MATCH TO SHEET NO. 2.'S ( Cultivated Area 0 0 0 M t0 c10 N JOHN W. ARRASMITH COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER D u u .�- --- n.. DATUM: USC E GS a s li x 1994 111111111.111.11111111111UNIMi ►_ /996, � �� -1� \ � ' owe l l .. ► Li 1 - f a o 0 0 0 V0 1 t0 CO N w DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY : 5- 18- 67 REMISED JUNE 1984 DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY: 3 - 30-84 I BM62 \2027.21 24 M 82 2105.74 0 z 1— w w _ 0 H O O O (D CO N w Sec. Cor. N 254,139.79 E 2,864,670.23 0 0 N 2 52,000 N 251,000 SCALE: =200' G.I.: 5' SHEET 53 -26 -N N 253,000 1) AV 11 1111111 n x 1950.5 2119.5 W. L . /997 23/7 , W. L. 1.9.97 x2298 0 2099.5 x2287 4 catcvroarvro 4- st a r) -- e.A8 • SI 3 ft Dc'vV2.1C) 2Ciak" a o t) x 2082 x 08/.5 .2022 20/7 \\ TENNIS X I Cult. (( x2/2q r /9375 x /938.5 x x /9455 G9 x222.9 x /943 /946.5 x „ ? ■ \—/ , , --' , ----..---- Z ------" 4 -'"-- ; ---- )./ ,-- 2069. I lli I 1 ---„ AL9V3E8L I At GR ) ,____,/ \ --. I Pi T \\ 1 illri 195o \ 1 1 ,---- / ir i \____„------- ,i--- ,„---/ , . — ------ // / „-- .- , Ai ' X I , . , N.A . L ................... 0 • d aVEREAMENM IIMMIEffir,1 /92/ x 1.937 / /962 5 • x E'73 \ 2286) 1 0 27 x2317 (KJ(3 23 , x/9305 26 it r Th 23214 • / 8 TH - x 19 / AVE /92 _ x x /9375 -0- r •\ ALCOTT SCHOOL 2/9/ Ls S 2.) x 2/ Cultivated Area 6:D tr,,c 1 \Q37.2) 1* 17 / — z 924 0> 64 2( x x 22/.9 5 /925: c. c a x222/ s Culftiva � . _.'_^_ 210' ' 21O' ' ^ ` ------ , 7- -- / ox� � �u / �v ' | ' � ` ' i � � | | � � | / . | / \ . / | | | | | r | | | i | | ~' G |' � | | 3 | � ` lin Sell- Pratt Seh . ,Substation /t luestiian , i � i . MULTI .UNITS • 125 (PF1OPOSED) 'DENSITY UNITS/ACRE (PROPOSED) . EXISTING 'ZONING --- AGRI SUBURBAI NOTE:' ROADS- VACA,TED PER PLAT :REQUEST � � '� Engineel.s/Land Surveyors S. 104 Freya Ste. 203 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-5272 210' ,' ` .� - '21O' ' ^ / � ` r | � 1' 1 _ L.. I . . _.'_^_ ' i , \ . | i ^ ` 1 i 1: 1 1 1 1, , -t----i---‘ ---L----- 1 . Lti)T W i 0 ------ _ , 7- / ox� � �u / �v ' � � | | | / . / | | | | | ~' G |' 1 I ' I I 1 1 i 1 _L__ _.I__.__J I__ __I__ -I . LOT e 1 - --- F--- -�---- �-� | ' | � � | | | � | | !3 | BLOpK ' 1 J___ c14_.___L 1 LOT elp � . _.'_^_ 210' ' 21O' ' ^ ` ------ , 7- -- / ox� � �u / �v ' | ' � ` ' i � � | | � � | / . | / \ . / | | | | | r | | | i | | ~' G |' � | | 3 | � ` lin Sell- Pratt Seh . ,Substation /t luestiian , i � i . MULTI .UNITS • 125 (PF1OPOSED) 'DENSITY UNITS/ACRE (PROPOSED) . EXISTING 'ZONING --- AGRI SUBURBAI NOTE:' ROADS- VACA,TED PER PLAT :REQUEST � � '� Engineel.s/Land Surveyors S. 104 Freya Ste. 203 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-5272 i C I 129.25' -- KJ 1 v I 1 oil 1 cn CO 1 1 CO CO CO ( I C -I I _ 1 N00 ° 29'33 "W 1� ` I • 129.25' - �J I � I 1 5")1 I R) 0 of 1 0 'I 1 N00 ° 29'33 "W J 129.25' Q I I , F; I W I D M I I 1 N00 29' 33 "W I 129.25 - - i m cnl CO o S N00 ° 29'33 "W :131 - _ 50.00 ' _ � _ _ In 3 _ 59.80' _ - - P 8 89.98' 0 0 - 109.80' - --I -- L - I - - -- 209.63 - - - -4_ -J ROADWAY ROADWAY SPECIAL CURB INLET (Spokane City Standard #B -144A) WILBERT VAULT # ° 1840 STD. CURB W /DROP SLOPE = 1/4 in /ft. SLOPE = 4: 1 N.T.S. ROADWAY STD. CURB W /DROP SLOPE = 1/4 in /ft. SLOPE = 8: 1 r - r I I N .T.S. STD. CURB SLOPE = 1/4 in /ft. SLOPE= 5: 1 N .T.S. SIDEWALK 3.8' 6' 6' 10' 10' N .T.S. ALSO NORTH SIDE OF 14th. AVENUE AT DRYWELL LOCATIONS 12' 5' R/W 10' WIDE UTILITIES & DRAINAGE EASEMENT 1 6' / 3' •4 0.6 TYPICAL SECTION WITH. SIDEWALK & SWALE 1' k 1' 0.6' SLOPE = 8.33 : 1 1' 0.6' SLOPE _ 5.5 : R/W i TYPICAL DRYWELL SECTION. LLOYD STREET (West) & MORRILL STREET (East) DRYWELL 6 ' 'TYPICAL DRIVEWAY SECTION WITH SIDEWALK 14t h AVENUE - North S i d e 10' WIDE UTILITIES & DRAINAGE EASEMENT 6' TYPICAL SECTION WITH SPECIAL CURB INLET 1 4th . AVENUE - North S i d e W LDWOOD THRRACH / SLOPE= 8.33: 1 T.O.G.= 0.3' BELOW GUTTER LINE TYPICAL ROAD SECTIONS R/W 10' WIDE UTILITIES & DRAINAGE EASEMENT ROADWAY MAX 2: 1 MAX 2: 1 T.O.C. — FL 6' 4, CURB 8.33: 1 6' 0.6' \ N.T.S. TYPICAL N. T.S. 18' TYPICAL 14th SOD TO GRADE IN SWALE STD. 1'1' 6 ' SECTION 6' TYPICAL DA \ N.T.S. SOLTH SIDE CENTER LINE NORT SIDE ROADWAY 0 0.5' TYPICAL ROA D SECTION loth. AVENUE - North Side w /sidewalk SEE SIDEWALK DETAIL 4th . ( South) - LLOYD DRYWELL (o ' 4 in. CRUSHED ROCK TOP COARSE OF 5/8 in. MINUS W.S.H.D. SLOPE= 1/4 in /ft. SPEC. ASPHALT CONTENT 5 3/4% to 6 1/4% SLOPE= 4:1 2 in. ASPHALTIC CONCRETE CLASS B W.S.H.D 12' 18' 0.6' PLAN VIEW 5' . 1.11. 5' PLAN VIEW 10' 1' 14th. AVENUE Nonth Side 6' MORRILL 8144 SIDE SLOPES= 8.33 : 1 DRYf/ELL SECTION AVENLJF (South) 1 20' STANDARD CURB 1 8' SIDEWALK 10' ° SIGN SCHEDULE wamommaareassrago DETOUR 14TH AVENUE CLOSED HAVANA TO CARNAHAN DETOUR 14TH AVENUE CLOSED HAVANA TO CARNAHAN DETOUR 14TH AVENUE CLOSED HAVANA TO CARNAHAN 5' R/W 1' 10' WIDE UTILITIES & DRAINAGE EASEMENT 1' 0.6' 1 SLOPE= 8.33: 1 CENTER LINE 4 in. CRUSHED ROCK TOP COURSE OF 5/8 in. MINUS W.S.H.D. 6' 2 in. ASPHALTIC CONCRETE CLASS B W.S.H.D. SPEC. ASPHALT CONTENT 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% NOTE: ALL SIGNS MUST CONFORM TO M.U.T.C.D. AND SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS. TYPICAL ROAD SECTION LLOYC STREET & NOPRILL SIRE 17TH 18' 0.5' H ARTSON DETOUR PLAN TYPICAL DRIVEWAY 4.5: 1 i 8.33: 1 1' 1' 0.6' 6 ' 8.33: 1 R/W SENSKE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil Engineers /Land Surveyors S. 3009 Mt. Vernon Suite 101 Spokane, WA 99203 -4775 (509) 534.5272 PHOENIX 00 7RACIN6 CtWT 21I C� 2.100 '2.110 2100_ = 11 + 8 .20 I 5TH A Et�Li ERZ-`12.1 2091.94 ER 2 +92.81 2091.95 ■ MOM •lMIti1I • � MI MIME I MIKI __ . INIIIMINIMMIIII �1iiri- ® MINIIIIIIIIIMIMMIMMIL 4 �illi IIIIIMMINIMPIIIE MOINIA OEM ITIO - �' �M MEN IIIMIIIIIII•MMMSIMIIMIIIIII 11•10•1121111•111111 MIEN � �y c o ' ? o 3 c-ol 0 2 +c0 ..- `0,90 5 9,. o W 310 10 — 13 1 at w 3 n � LO as- 1 W� 12 .� w J o uiW 176 Q Ill J 19 ; a) u ) Q ceic 0 1� � E -R. S+tD8,13 ._. _091. - 3 LLOY -1 2097.32 w 3 _ - - - - 0 0 0 3 o 1- 0 0 N 0°2.9' SO "�V o �_. ■ 0 J TA C+2 - DPECIAL Cu123 LIl b4.30 DAM 2095.29 5R, (D" WLtI "Ek t� tiJ c.: ER (04,2.2 STOP SIGN PER / M.U. C. `_-JPOKANE Co. STD DW (t- o N O \l OO D LA N 1b 18 0 W � 2 1 2D' 0 .J ,8 {30 DAM z J MD CUM it. WALK. 114 - 1.q(O ,.;F rage = 2095. 3 TER /\CE "—PROPOSED VAC.. NOTE' II.1 -06.15 I4TI.4 = (o-i-(01. Q O LLOYD ST. REVISIONS AN 1713.1v1, RAILROAD SPI Ke IN TOP OF SAWED Ot=F POWER POLE +/ 40' LT. STA, +22 14TH AVE JUE, EL.EV, = 2085.29 CITY DATUM, DRAWN 1L CHECKED APPROVED PLAN NUMBER DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION SCALE HORIZONTAL 1 11:: SO VERTICAL 1 1 0 ' • OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF SPOKANE, WASHINGTON LLOY 1 STREET 15T AVENUE TO l4-r A\/ MEMMIMMIIIIINF•11111 MI II= _ =IPS 1=1=11011 ,. MI1=11111gf " PAIMMIIIMI MEM ■ i IP2=.11 laillfflleall=1=1.1== 4' WilEM IMMIPAMI MIIIIIMIC IPPIIMMUNISWAN ' MI= 1:111 =Milli= MEIIP_ =MP MIPSIEMMIUMWA= =1111=1111M111 11=EIC =MM. 111111,1M. =111 II F/111=111111111141 MI= MN= • 1 IN3 U1' IIIIIIIIIM =NEM 11====11111111-1= -. =1=1=1111111111=11= =11111LIMMENNIMINI=i1111111=M111111111=====1•111111111111111111 =NEI =MI MINIIIIIIIIIIIIM 44 =111 111=111• mrimmumw 11===1=1 111k111:1=11===11111121=1=1 -- " 1 ■11111115:1=1111811==!1=1111= ENNI= IIMIMMI ift■l_ I. 11=111MINIIIMIIIIM4] IMPQ=M=N: =Mb bill:11111111===10 .P111111=1. MN= 11.111.-■====111=111•Til i ====M1111=1111 IIIIMMINIMIIM FM= _MI11111=1=1, I MI 1=1=111111114... 1111= =111===1=11111111110•11111MINIIII =NM IMIIIIIIIIIM E MEP MIM == ' 11 =1=1=MIMPI . . SA MIMI 111=IM 011111111111111111M ' Millni , 1=1=1 -, q - MI " fa MIMI •11■MIllill' I MEIN - NI= INIIIIIIIIII 11111■ MIME IriumumErj ■1 ...111111151111111111111111111P INIMIZIMIMIIIIIINIM=111111111 NM= •1■11111111111111111111111= 11111111111111=1===1111= NIIMMI =■17 mom ilA loo■ amennomihroorm =NM E =MN 111111111 iiiih., ■111119==f1=1111===11===l =MIN •1 11 =MIN ==1111=111=111111111=1===111111114 I MIME "MOINE= MIRMIPANNUMIIMIZMNI. NM= b..1111111=1111•11=1=11111•1== 1114.74•1101=1.1 MEN MIN111.1== MIPOLIN=Iilaill= W MN= M n IIIMEM 11, = MI' v Es i iiiin . .1111M ER 3+(.28.8s MORRILL R 20 co ER (0; 7_2.6,c, 2101.34 Li 90 32 41" R 20. ot.) T )- (3- n z j --) . 0 0 cf)L cf) all NM T ER -0+ ...34:3 Ls) < ST REET - 5 x(ST. VvATER. Cu OFF Box REVISIONS T.E5 To Nu OF FIRE 1-4YDRAKIT Ar ),IORTHWEST CORNER Or 14Tvi HAvAkIA. ELEN, ----- 2099.55 CITY DATUM, DRAWN CHECKED APPROVED • ENGINEERING DIVISION , DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF SPOKANE, WASHINGTON M OR R LL T ET PHOENIX ® 71600 II TRACING CLOTH Li PLAN NUMBER ict 37 iv Loz,S:{ — 4SY — ' .20q7,(0 O-ogg PAVED 2, o2.r 20, NS5q x 191,1,7 A lbtS•Y 16157.1 x x 19ss.F 0 x 2}) CT; c=, a r9S8',.5 961 V [ `x1 }.ij i 324. I ` N . ! • 4 ' 3 r. E 8z-/-703,7 L11•J NOT _LI VERTICAL AL TOPOGRAPHIC MAP PREPARED BY & ASSOCIATES iNC, .t A rvi i jp j / � /O C :ntour interval; 2 ' Data Date of Photography: _ / 3 _ g�,r /v!1 5 0atuni , /„l Or U! 4 UNTY AIN /O• AMR ...........nomMTLECC *maim 23\ 1 ' 7 ' MINI ERN 20211 RIME -111111111"; j�■181��1��l MEI o IIiI � p F P7*6 443 ANHI ii iiluiii ii I lI! III!H!P CGK?8004/*/0 SEVENTH w —' + = 0T.P14 +7Qo,j Ca M111111 o Illill IMO ,2639.8' /5 .5 SE CT /.0 n,' c REPR0ZUCED TH RTEENTH FR M .hnrt r.r -;., er "of. y / /74 � - ;, n H .a -� 9a 4 -_; . i .�y -`v r: ,4 4 L/3 8/. MINN IIIIIIII L./ /J G N 0. W. ,R, R,' 6 Co: .1. +2 A I 7 °O5 ' Lt. D. 9°00 Lt. T 95.66' L.189.91 -"• R G36.7'' CO NO A3 2 °43`RF., D.1O °00 Rt. ' m � T.168•19' I+ . L•327.I7' {0 -� R.573' N ! � j I:: I P',✓,v r AL �.: .>'o i?./. %y/3'YO <t- — v` o ; ,2 "- W.>o • yf? /.' ,1i/. 7 11 DrainTield !Easement x _ .-- /5 Ti`i s 89° 55'30 "Z-.; L12 8/ . /¢TH Y>=t LUVv53bJ34tVE= p s PELINE. • L9811 8 /Ze ¢r ; -qrE 9 r y rP , . 58q , r L11m� iii. r < ki ANNE 7 ; -t � r A ar. 0fOS:5'¢ • 2O° L t. 8 �'ir► L3 82 . 15' '93 589 ° 5IE R•286.5 v,ac_ s v /ass SCALE 1" =100' n 111 Q J Q_ AVENUE cv 0) 0 CITY 12 th. ° 221, 27 0 CU (N1 Cr) c-1 CU '7 L9 CD CU 0 Cr) 1 Cr) 30' in v 0 O m m m m 30' 30 ' � 1 L_ - 0 30 z r t O O 0•) m m m 30' 30 O 0) 0 0 Cr) <Cr) Cr) z Cr) 30'ro 26 • o a co 10 1P 8 th. AVENUE WEST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 23 Fd P.K. nail and RP'S. Fd 'x' on curb NW Corner Havana & Hartson NW - 42.01' Fd 'x' on curb NE Corner Havana & Hartson NE - 39.85' Fd. 'x' on Concrete Headwall of Storm Sewer SE 40.48' City Mon. 1.0' South & 0.4' West. 359 ;36' 12 th. AVENUE ' 359.37' - - - -I L- 13 t h . AVENUE (vacated),. 209.62 209.62 - 1 - 189.82 -r 1 -r T i T PP 359.41' z 16 th. AVENUE 1 14 th . AVENUE 359.38' L 1 15 th. AVENUE ° 359.41' SW CORNER SECTION 23- 25 -43. Fd. Granite Rock w /'x' in center wedged in top of 4" Tile Pipe. RP's to City ties. Fd. nail in Brass L.S. tag in NW Face of P.P. NE - 82.68' Fd. Tack in Brass L.S. tag in So. face of P.P. NE - 33.25' Fd. Tack in Brass L.S. (#7317) tag in blazed 12" Pine SW - 35.08' N 89 - 2631.78' (2636.9' REC.) 359.36' 130 ' Ln 0 m c-1 Ln O m m l 30 '1 BUILDING SETBACK LINE I 1 1 1 ' °� - -- --- I--- 1 - - - -- 1 I m 209.63 1 z O 0 z to 0 m m u\ 0 Cr) Cr) A\ 1- L co O 0) 0 CD CD cc J J H I 1 c cc 1 O 1 I - - - - j 30' 30 SOUTH 1/4 CORNER SECTION 23 Fd. 1/2" I.P. RP- N 45 W - 38.29' to nail w /tag #706 in PP. RP- S 60 W - 54.14' to cross in curb radius. RP- S 30 W - 55.34' to nail w /tag #706 in PP. S 89 59'25 "W - 2634.00' 10' TELEPHONE EASEMENT - - 359.37' 89 "E 209.62 N 359.38' 89.60 m m N O 0 z 1109.79 T D CURVE 1 2 3 6 I I I i 209.63 tt7 CU a) CU 109.801 N 89 56'51 "W 359.41' 359.41' 1048.1 m m cu 0 z BEING A REPLAT OF BLOCKS 8, 9, & 10 AND PARTS OF BLOCKS 19 & 20 AND ADJOINING STREETS AND ALLEYS. ALL IN THE SW 1 14 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 43 EAST, W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1 109.80 • N DELTA 89'27'21" 90 89'26'57" 0) O 0 z 56'48 "W 1048.15 tn ' - I 0 -1-I 10 • (7;1 0 II m 'I I S 89 "E 658.77 109.79 to i I m n• I I m • I I m a) 1 1 1 BLK ° z 109.79 N 89 ° 56'55 "W - 2629.57' (2633.8 REC.) 130' z RADIUS 20.03 20.00 20.00 rn 0 m m 30 '� tf) CU 0) (U L ___ - - - 359.37' 0 209.62 r 209.E 109.80 I - m I N O I 0 ! z 109.80 2 A 3 to 0) 10 I c0 0) CU 1 89 "W 658.78 T z ° CC 1 O o m 1 I Q 1 I W I 0 1 - -- --1 30' 301_ - BASIS OF BEAHI The Bearing of N 0U 23' 2 9 "'W un SW 1/4 of Section 23 Town' :r, as aer plat of KAW 1?.JA HI ). AL BASIS CFAI:iD lil i / . . ARL 31,20 :31 _ L 1 31.22 CENTER 1/4 CORNER SECTION 23 Fd. Brass Cap RP- S 60 E - 49.51' to tack in PP w /tag #16198 RP- N 60 W - 60.58' to tack in TP RP- S 60 W - 29.40' to 'x' in rock. 359.36' 359.38' 1109.8 3 tl7 m rn N 0 0 z 109.80 I � � I - I� 1 L_ 359.40' LEGEND: 359.41' TANGENT 19. 81 20,1 1 H1 209.63 1 T '1 I 209.63 R4 • POINTS FOUND AS NOTED. 1 1 U7 Cti 0) T 1 0 1/2" REBAR SET W /CAP LS #16198 0 Rec = Per Plat OF WOODLAND TERRACE ' t W . I.1 is /171 'I 11 t 0 m 10' TELEPHONE EASEMENT I IBUILDING'SETBACK LINE -- - 9.98 C3 109.80 1 10 1 111 • II 11 11 I I 0 m 0 cn 0 • 0) O 130' 30'1 I � I I I I w O oA 0 P N CH0RL CHORD BRG 15 'J 45'13'07 "W t 1 . kc' ; ) " -14' 46' 49 E x'8.,1 °: D 45 19 "E 1523.71' L - - -- -� - -� O to O O 0) w O 1f) 0 0 m Cr) 00 Q 10 O� m CC > 1 O -1 _J 30' 30 - - -- m 1521.34' r i 1 O to O m 1561.82' 1 I - C 1 0) 1 c I CD I 1 P co \ cu CO CU Fd. County Record O Spike for Approx. C I Cente ine Intex 1 ✓ r)from true 1 location. 1 \r 0 O u) L_ _ N 89 56'48"W 1522.53' r 10' TELEPHONE EASEMENT I I 1 1 1 1 1 w 1 II) N 89 ° 56'511W N 1521.93' Y � x"<% LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT BLOCK LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT Co 0 cu co m N 0 m m 0 m m 1 = 2 = 3 = 4 = 5 = ry o I f} )1, 0 1 Q1 01 CC I' z 1 Q' 1 ,' cc z I ' (. L AREAS PER LOT BLOCK 1 62908 SQ.FT. 62992 . SCE .FT . 6 2 9 9 2 S. FT 62990 SQ.FT. 62992 SO.FT. 2 1 = 14102 SO FT. 2 = 14191 SO.FT 3 = 14190 SQ.FT. 4 = ' 14191 SQ.FT. 5 = 1 30. ET . LOT 6 = 14106 SQ.FT. RECEI a 6 1985 lounti 2 - o(D 'ILDc�ooD rEt�2Ac.E SEASt A SSoC, ■'-t'7 RID /CRP /PLAT No. \Q(1)1.. D (N 0 o D ir c(2_ TO: MATERIALS LABORATORY SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE Typical Cross Section Determination Date �/— as-es FROM: G-, N 1= S o_N Please furnish Stabilolneter R values for the soils on the following project: D test 1 1 actual County Road Name(s) //k AV E, L 1 nyo ROAD NAME ! LhLK AU' 1-1 ro yo Y"A4Akt FUNCTIONAL CLASS Major Arterial Secondary Arterial Collector Arterial Access Road Private Road 1y ?� 7 6 5 5 4 Drainage - Percolation greater than 72'' /hr. yes No_ Est. Act. Remarks* .9 - S' vhf T .47,5 C e ohs So gr , 4 1 .D ,E'7 ',1 e` r, r, .. D — C-.-,r4� -4 .4 nl G A / S .c z=' / s Q o i .v G- 7 fir " --CM _ s ,, ' -c 7-a Drilling request a" - /ASP /e 7` C�,t en, C'L ss "8' --- FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ROAD NAME FUNCTIONAL CLASS R VALUES LOCATION 7 4= ,;; 1 > E9c ' 17 TRAFFIC INDEX Sec. �� Twp. a R. (See attached section map) TRAFFIC INDEX ** These are g u i d e l i n e traffic indexes only. Traffic data '41)( i f it. to t hi pry' joc t. are necessary to calr9late individual traffic indexes. AAA_ til - t cti ; I t c 1111,4WN, P l ei'€t To 1, 7Y ; Ye_ 5% ar\_• p e f O. - 1-C2'fc c%7 * Please note any unusual characteristics of soils and /or topography. Are the soils suit able for the use of drywelis? Are there any unusual drainage considerations? SCALE 1" =100' 0 Q c11ti 12. try. WOWED JAN 2 5 1985 ggi!ti Weft 8 th. AVENUE 0 N fU t 1 30' M v to 0 CO 0 m m 30' 30'130' o'30' O cu C_D ✓ Cl: • 0 CO CO 30' 27 26 WEST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 23 Fd P.K. nail and RP'S. Fd 'x' on curb NW Corner Havana & Hartson NW Fd 'x' on curb NE Corner Havana & Hartson NE Fd. 'x' on Concrete Headwall of Storm Sewer City Mon. 1.0' South & 0.4' West. 13 0 too 0 12 th. AVENUE 209.62 T 18- 359:36' WOOD I` I °:( Im 14 th. AVENUE 359.36' 359.41' - r th . AVENUE 359.41' 16 th. AVENUE r SW CORNER SECTION 23- 25 -43. Fd. Granite Rock w /'x' in center wedged in top of 4" Tile Pipe. RP's to City ties. Fd. nail in Brass L.S. tag in NW Face of P.P. NE - 82.68' Fd. Tack in Brass L.S. tag in So. face of P.P. NE - 33.25' Fd. Tack in Brass L.S. (#7317) tag in blazed 12" Pine SW - 35.08' 1 30 ' T ) 1 N 89 ° 58'45 "W 2631.29' (2636.9' REC.) 359.36' ln h 209.62 0 Cr) CO 3 0 m 0) 30' 1 I BUILDING SETBACK LINE 209.63 0 1 0 0 0 (U 0 0 SE 1 1 (.o 0) 0 C2 1 0 C ' F-f j CC 1 CC 0 l I _130 ' 301_ SOUTH 1/4 CORNER SECTION 23 Fd. 1/2" I.P. RP- N 45 W - 38.29' to nail w /tag #706 in PP. RP- S 60 W - 54.14' to cross in curb radius.- - RP- S 30 W - 55.34' to nail w /tag #706 in PP. 5 89 59'25 "W - 2634.00' 42.01' 39.85'' 40.48' 0 m 1 m 359.37' - - --I L-- th AVENUE (Vacated) r - - - 1 - AND Z 359.38' • 89.60 to (U 0) CURVE 1 2 6 359.37' 89 209.62 BLOCK 109.80 109.80 1- T - - -m- N I I I 2I I L-1 1 N 69 56' 51 " ta' 359.41' 359.41' T DELTA 89'27'21" 90'32'47" 89'26'57" BEING A REPLAT OF BLOCKS 8, 9, & 10 AND PARTS OF BLOCKS 19 & 20 AND ADJOINING STREETS AND ALLEYS. ALL IN THE SW I/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 43 EAST, W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON - - - --� 1048 . 1,1 0) • 'O 10 to tU rn (11 iz 1 I I I 209.63 I I i 209.83' I 209.63! N'89'56'48 "W 1048.15 0 , �o 359.38'' S 89'56'48 "E 658.77 • 109.79 I i I © f I I I BLK 109.79 89'56'4 -L _ N 89'56'55 "W - 2629.57' (2633.8' REC.) 30' 3 ( m rn 0 0 z 3 () 0) cu 0 0 RADIUS 20.00 20.00 20.00 RR 0 O 30' rn 0 m r) V\J I I -DWOOD 359.37' Q 209.62 109.80 tt) tU of CU 1 109.80 "W 658.78 I i 2 O m OD 7)I Q W 0 - - - - 1 30 ' 30' 3 CO m rn 0 0 z In N 1 359.36' A J T 1 1 i 359.40' C _ LEGEND: z° CC o • POINTS FOUND AS NOTED. 35( .41' AHL TA;:0 -U1 .tr'. BASIS OF BEARINGS The Bearing of N 00 ° 23'29 "W on the East .._ ~}.. + the SW 1/4 of Section 23 Township 25 North Hange 43 Exit as per plat of KAHUNA HILLS 2 nd. ADDITION was a'(; BASIS OF BEARINGS for this subdivision. CENTER 1/4 CORNER SECTION 23 Fd. Brass Cap RP- S 60 E - 49.51' to tack in PP w /tag #16198 RP- N 60 W - 60.58' to tack in TP RP= S 60 W - 29.40' to 'x' in rock. 0 209.63 o T i 1 BUILDING SETBACK LINE 109.80 109.80 (U T 1 I I L 0 (1) 89.98 0 1/2" REBAR SET W /CAP LS #16198 Rec = Per Plat OF WOODLAND TERRACE 0 0 (1) C3 0) 0 '-, 109.80 W 0 L�) o) 0 0 CO 0 0 m m 0 0 U7 ( l ' 3H.) N 5 ' 1 3 N 4' +r 49' L - -__ E 1523.71' Af I 1 1561.82 0 1 in • 0 cm l W - <t 0 0 tl) o m Q c*) (U Fd. County Record 0 Spike for Approx. 0' I Centerline Intex from true location. I N 89°56'48"W 1522.53 uJI N 89° 56'51 rn cu 1521.93' 01 OT AREAS BLOCK e7 m cu m CO 0 N CO CO N O m m .- . :1 (1 0 [I:I 1410 T 0. r1 � 0L . FT . TERRACE SENSKE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil Engineers /Land Surveyors S. 3009 Mt. Vernon Suite 101 Spokane, WA 99203 -4775 (509) 534-5272 irmasamararati ImisarOxiix 2 � 100 211a 0 - 1 :13.M.-- ToP KtuT Q� F(RE F4YDRA1 AT 1\1.W. COIz OER O 14 T1-1 NAAAN S. EI—Ev , 20 g9.55 CITY DA-ru tOrz SO' 30' -fri • Za drz d >✓ 7h 1 _ iY ;031 if , �0 1 d f ri <t . cj fD u- MA C.14 1189 °27 T19 :.81 1.10-re 0+30 14 -TH Avr HAVA'I ©, I ZTN AVE_ r`A c =L =„ 4 1'; 1, . I WSTALL 15TOP "-S►G-hd 4,ER 5PoKA14E Co. STANDARDS 1Igo -6— SPECIAL CuRE . i INLETS S`FA. I o412 ' & TA 1 2..4-15 : S i- 24. T O � 8 � RT. CO TR.uCT DR'C'.41ELL Vs// f� '4; 3 F. , t.�14' _ GRATe ft1,4 T 0-G. - 209 S. v?.. 8 d4 ). 10' ,rt `t (, A99 7 R rA. +51. "1 zI RT C01.tsT r u cT 1•1•1 t4 WELL WITH TIYPE. ) .Ft< CARAT E EL.2101. 7 , `o •? • T 21.4 C 1 ■ FR/ ..1\1E tf. .`I t r:. TOG 100•i„o . C:IAI CURE: INLET STOP • : PIER M•u i .C. D. 4 ANGI Co. .r70• . 4:R 5TA, 472"7,4 3x' '41 ,i)At, oAM-7+40 / ST'A -Q — CO>; s ,. - TYNE E 17s'fw ;:: TYPE I' 3 FRAME c::. CI ?098.87 u 1 f 1 • SPEC. 1F CUt i UL4 i j > I2" DA. WATf=R MAN • • • ♦ • • • • • • • StA, I1 +051 - SPEC tat_ v CURL I INLET STA, 144-05 ^ :4' . LT, !CONSTRUCT 1`WE DR`r- 1 WELL WITH (l` `�a. 1 RAMt= "$ C ELI<V 2094.87 10 FIRt NY SAN. M MATC i =xtsT, ASP!-I. ST SIGN PER 0. T C- S�1U, D 8. '. :�PoKANE Co, STb MATCH Exi5T, ABPH. Slue, it. CAP WATER to' 13EYO O NEW ASPHALT So' RADIUS TER : A 5 4 PLAT v TC).M.- RAILROAD SPIKE- Ito 5A,tED OFP POWER. LT. STA. 15+22, i4T1-1 > v. = 2oa5. 29 'CITY P OEN,x 6� RACING CLQTM I so' 112." i . M� RACE tee 11 0 (1\101 crlctu L • Lvl It LOT V.1) REVISIONS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION CITY OF SPOKANE, WASHINGTON DRAWN 1- 21-456 SRL CHECKED APPROVED SCALE HORIZONTAL 1 u = SO' VERTICAL 1" = 10' n cr 0 0 2 3o' 10" ',WI. sew. ,AM.. 8 +Sa 1 f ' T1Ls.8+ 15 Zi.r RT.: CaN- rRuc.T TYPE U DR. I _LL," WITH T ce FRAtvte $. GEAT (= ELL ), 20q6. ' STA.81.15 SPECIAL URF INLET LOT cf `\j 0 LoT_ u + • •( , a..) /Fgj: 1 0 J1 to - 6- `Q 0 , 510 � 3 . 0 (C Lip At O LIT — SEE SEWER /77 10 tet. 6 /A 5(9 PR o s Pi -c r N1P9� /40' /or " i�� ; h 90' 90 9. 3s /20.54 701 51 ya r G 2 7 i /Ss. 3 132.1 /6.5 /6S /`9 TN 3 /0 4` ,292 147/3 S ® �,. lU /00 /6T 470 305.39 130 ZOVNTY o' 3 /2 tallil rip oci iigi 1 , Russ /O FA, 11 7 L:J 11 17 2 yon ti 00 .. t , ,. 09 Mi 41/ V r J o i 0.... ...,„,v1 A A ►, ; :'L E /f 97 4, // mamas 7 3 F,o 0.15.1C. ..'�_ 77o :6s rAe /4 r. J MA /1 /P ' ern L D . 380- kr /80 HH /0 ' /1 r s 4 3 2 / 0. lo...-- : 1 0 7 8'9 ; /0 // 0 v Sec23 Tp 254'R NINTH N H 0 4L4 /8 /9 to Enr6Ar E /v 2 V500110soannii AF dmonagmanal 411111.11111 U11111 gilt iumm tmemM01... =MY 4 foltWitaa".144171;AE 3 4v ItlEINOMPU 111111 OimmetmaimIst iiiI AS 9.1 0/4 g 7 c s 4 / ELEUE/VT/+' nom r L G 5A9 0 k 0 /45.6 1 /20. O h 5- /2-64 File Ale. /885 200 /70.1 e garig2131 3 , VAC.(kl - wD t s e —13'4 t0 - t RIEG 0 7 PL ANNE 220.80 A. V ® V b 27 ,3.`4 20 S r 5 .97/E ct W 3, SS c) /Zs 1 1.78.02. z o ® I AA 1 . 4 1. C ■00: 22 R 11 - 1, m ti 10 .22' • 125 1z 10 11 3: 1 I00 .16TH 100.35 9 3 4 5 o6.8Z 105 ".. 105' 100'. 110' 8 4 M 100' 105 0, e5 /8 260. iM rH 150' 0 6 0 0 X 83 .3 0 12 83.66 00 0 15 TH 3 A 1 D it /6 11 210 4 d Flo MTV or NE COUNTY iSESSOR 0.9/ .4c 2 // r't.C". / 3 /74 2.2 //O '2 8 -� I` \ �J 1 ) } /7¢ � c / 4 /7,z if 9 /0 /1 i , /2 /3 / /5 N N 1/4,/,r /6 l7 /8 /9 20 2/ 22 / 4 /6 - /to ` 209 /74 / 74 /74 / 3 / 2 1 / / / 9 8 7 6 if 4 3 2 Z•69/ L O 4 3 2/ Fr691 1/4,/,r /6 l7 /8 /9 20 2/ 22 23 24 2,1" 26 S 6 7 8 /31/21// I /0 et /0 9 8 7 6 S 4 3 Z Z•69/ L O 4 3 2/ Fr691 • % 4 AT /6 /7 /8 19 20 2/ 22 23 24 2,5 _re/ N J' G 7 8 1 // /0 et 8•69/ F869/ - 1'8 ' 88'69/ t‘) h '69/ I � F6 /I 3 V N 86 WA 0 N A9/3 Z•69/ L O J6 S9/ 8 d 9/ I Fr691 X969/ . 19 6'69/ 0 ,6•62/ J6•7! • 0.) \N 24 /2 // /o _ 9 8 7 / , 5 4 3 2/ p F/ 1 yes / /4 ./5 /6 /7 /8 /9 20 2/ 22 23 24 , `// /o 9 8 7 / 6 f .5 4 3 2/ p F/ I ss 1....2____1 L. r /9 20 z 2/ 23 N , // /o y 8 7 6 .5 4 3 2/ p F/ /3 /4,,, 1,5 /G /7 /8 /9 20 2/ 22 23 24 /2 a / 7 9 ✓ / 8 7 6 6 4 3 2/ p F/ /3 /4 1,5 /6 /7 /8 /9 20 2/ 22 23 24 IN Cis .9 ••9 ' 7 /O • ti • 11 ,1014?,9y 1') __._n . /a.%e' r' " 6,5 si 9 6 V k • sr 9 E/ 9•44-/ // /O 9 8 7 6,5 I t4 4 3 2 p F/ E` fi (4 /J /6 /7 / 6 /8 /9 20 2/ 22 23 24 /2 h) ` // /0 9 8 7 6 I t4 4 3 2/ 1/43i z/ i eF // 1 sr �/ /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 20 2/ 22 23 5 /2 // /0 9 8 7 6 5 4 .3 2/ 1/43i z/ 4) sr �/ 8 9•69! 4` \ , % ,c3 /7 . 75 7 1/ — q. /3 1 // /0 9 8 /8 /3 /4 45 /6 /7 /8 /9 zo 2/ 222324" 23 sz/ /2 /1 /C 9 11514 Arl 3 7 6 ,5 4 3 Ito 1/43i z/ • 6p./ sr �/ 8 9•69! 4` \ , % ,c3 /7 . 75 7 1/ — q. /3 1 // /0 9 8 /8 /9 20 /4 22 /6 / 2 // /0 9 8 7 6 ,5 4 3 2 1/43i z/ • 6p./ sr �/ 8 9•69! 4` \ , % ,c3 /7 1 /2 /2 // /0 9 8 ry N' S /3 /4 1,f /6 /7 /8 /9 20°N. 22 23 /2 // /0 9 8 7 6 ,5 4 .3 2 p4 • 6p./ sr �/ 8 9•69! 4` \ , % ,c3 /7 • n� 1 n /8 T 80.70 \ /2 /2 // /0 9 8 £3.76- . . ♦ . /2 5 sz/ /3 /4 /.t' /6 /7 /8 19 20 2/ 22 23 S'Sf So 2 WIN .. 4 e9 69/ I .5 - 9'6%/ N 89'69/ L •69/ 1J SS' ,/ Of 9/ p4 • 6p./ sr �/ 8 9•69! 4` \ , % ,c3 /7 • n� 1 n /8 T 80.70 \ /2 /2 // /0 9 8 S'Sf So 2 •• 3 .. 4 .. 5 ., 6 ,. 7 5o 8�3 _ 8o,z40 f 39 N r 1 I o h �5f/ `� // 3-a /2 /3 /4 •_\ J5 N., 4` \ , % ,c3 /7 Q: SO • n� 1 n /8 T 80.70 \ G 8 11 , - // /2 - �jp�.YT • /7 7 7 8 7 111,5 4 3 2 .r!£/ sD /7 /8 ■ 20 2/ / ,_ 23 ' / 2 3 4 3 5 .r!£/ sD /z // ■ 9 8 / ,_ / 2 3 4 3 S .r!£/ sD P:rF/ // ■ 11. 7 t) / ,_ , - / 9 ../ � � /2 /2 // /0 9 8 [•■ rrci mis i i i r.7 3 4 5 ' P:rF/ // ■ 11. 7 t) .rsF/ I // /0 9 <8 7 [•■ rrci mis i i i r.7 1 N . rare/ 'N lic MI .r;re% P:rF/ // [•■ rrci mis i i i r.7 6 N . rare/ 'N b �1 ) I \ s ▪ rrei 2 3 ' / 1 . ti b �1 ) I \ s P:rF/ // 6 /0 11. 1J .rsF/ I // /0 /0 7 7 / 2 .3 4 S � I \ s /2 // 6 /0 9 8 .rsF/ I 8 9 /0 7 /2 - /2 I/ /0 9 8 £3.76- . . ♦ . /2 / 2 3 4 5' 8 /2 // 6 /0 9 8 .rsF/ I 6 5 liz 3 T 8 1 r y /0 6 5 4 C 3 2 i ,I'o J - y /0 // /2 IS 5 41 2 1 7 89 ,I'o J 4 3 2 / 7 8 9 /0 /1 /2 6 5 41 2 1 7 89 J/ 2 1 I // 3 6 5 4 M -� 2 J/ 2 5 4 3 7 20 2/ 22 23 24 /8 /9 l 21 22 23 .., \<\.`s. 2 ,5 ' 9 /o /1 /2 1 at-! // fo /o y 8 3 2 5 4 3 2 20 I \5' #6.rri I 1 IN errFi Q FEU . Bseft.nzeo 0 4 \ ,9 Fr•9e' 7 111 I za '9£, 0 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 4 /7 /8 L.. /9 20 2/ 22 23 24 /2 // /0 9 8 7' /3 .5 4 3 2 ✓ 3 Y£/ /3 /4 15 /6 /7 /8 /9 20 21 22 23 .., \<\.`s. 2 /2 /1 /o 7 6 5 4 3 2 a Cn 0 L /4 /.5' /7 /8 /9 20 2/ 22 - I � v ANIE C91.1 tSSESSOR TO c /T/ 723 3/270C14-B746 ri.43 toy R-(5 / r ^" F J20' Z v 02e m N 3 ri 04 Qt 120 6 a P 60 /80.24• 49' .SA9' 49• :h' 300.25' 60 .150 FIFTEENTH tt h v/ SIXTEENTH SEYEN TE ENTH 60 - , L= /GH HT - Ti 1- f - — 1 13,/� \ So NINETEENTH 1 a .emu 8 /0 7s 7.f /0 0 7J' 7,r 6 - 4 3 2 UTH RAVENYVOO© 7J /0 7J• I // /DO /z 7J s.99°27'.4/ 237.23• 30 1 0 130, /09 \ /4S o I o -� - —� - - t- - - 0) 1 977 0 30130 DD ; ' ° 0 /(? 8tt N N R AVEN /9 20 /9/ 7 ° A� BLVD 2/ 1 22123 24 /73 6 e;" T /VENT/ET/1 CONGRESS j1 6.0 ,. " i. 2.5 26 JO /00 AVE. 1259.15 204 3 2/4 ®6- 4 27 M 86.9 N } /74- /74 - - AVE. -, -- AVE). :12 92-/7170E 0 ' ' MONUMENT' t.9 30 130 o- m 1 1 B9' 48'1'4✓ 3 r o , mm A VE -- .9 I m (p MONUMENT LItvE 4 Q 159. 91.% Sea 27-Z7-43. /74 0 1 54 4 BL 9 54 0 N- 1 0 ' 140 0 .— .—.Z. - r'_ _ DED /CATER o 30 0 ' .. 54' 5 0 Q.30 P. 5, 4 3 2 1 _ 4) 1 57.94 �I ROB 6 7 9 01 A SUBDIVI ! i m � - o� O po .26 3 cis 3.3 /r O/V(/ M6/YT LINE 3410 0 r RTE NT _ 1 /9 20 �-o 1'I //V ETEEN TH 3.Z CON S 'DRESS I, / /2 l /I 9 8 7 6 \/ 4 5 ° , /4 /6 /7/8 3 2 ,r T 2/ 22 23 S /XTEENTH 60 /2 Ja - -EI GR Te'E/V 7'Iv 1321.6 7 6 /4 3 2 / tfo Doc 2064198 Sr ... e7 i E/ Y / 1 E f 4 ti fl l.n f . SO 76' v 0 W 5� \ /2 • Pl_ f �v 70 .. .. 2 42.45 - q CONG/? G s SBA °s4' / "J I A,vE 0 0 V S 0 • 0 I f \ k 1 W, 6 0( itt 60 TUDOR HEI GH Ti9ACT5 //75 OF /324 60 0 AVE. AVE. AV AVE /3 /2 /4 45 AVE. AVE Vac 7 -2 -51 /1 /6 S 60 /0 /7 AD, OR 173. s 9 /6' AVE Ord C- 114 8 19 7 20 6 � 2, ELM 1!Iii 1, J ENNUI " ROAD No. 231 •1 . AGUE KAN E THIRD AVE. 4 3 Z V E. NE 1867 -46 3 W Ve ..' r Nall r iiiiiiii» MEM 1111111111111 Ian ?l�111�N -•=2 -.= Prrial ,,, , ....„. , . Gd . ,9--Gos MINIM ininnt 1 al Mom ilimon,i 111111111111 1111111/1111 EIGH L ingli 111111 MK! . wW 111111 11011 111111 11111 1112i z 4 +70.0 o W i2EV SEQ / /8 / agoO 24-/7 //era d 11111111111111 111111111111 maussi ginulto mon goo Ne. 1 718 2$ ?J. •• SCALE_' 1 THIRTEE=NTH F FTEENTH 5IXTEENTH HOZIER - 1 111 N T ENTH 1IIF itiIrP 1,1 +26•oo A 17 °05 z' Lt D. 9 °00' Lt. T. 95.G6 " L. 189.91 4%, R 636.7' W. 0 ' � /'A,I,/ 4- /; • XT =N Np./818 - C . R . P. N® A 32 °43 Rt. D.10 ° 00 Rt. \ .168.19' ( . \L.327.17' 10 x \ x . 573' C9s\ 1N m A 1.0 259 - ,. 0 „ - GO' L/2 .812 /g7-/ '7 / 4 'r' N2 211O -EO . ilk -4- -- A/OTE 5)-/AO ED c, / /9- 0 c�J Ge..e, "we., 4 17"1.4 N /S / 7 SCT /O / /.' REPRODUCED ARIA DES /GNATS 1 /V.4CAT / OA/ // /N.TERS FR Ea - WAY " i- RAM L/ M 6 N TO A- 7YLAR• 70 /jravcJ 912, rtr S 89' 55' 30" YLLo - . 8- - P1.PE 'LAN J./3. / / ay'cr 7 /4 /Ow s o/ z TEk/ RA - 6 - /5 - 7 ce l i` I 2 I11 s 0 Z 6 l 11 -5T1-- A " '-- var.'D /97a 5 1x°r%4 AvE : Ney.cc�� 'Rl.3of'05:54 76 ° 26' L - t. D. 20. i 025.58' L- 392,15 J. n v 9 93 589 ° 5 1 'E \ 8.286.5' v. . ay) -4'8ss OPEN ACCESS PATH TO F,F1^,,,r4ST ti . t ..4 .P d "N K , s :zs r Av e . ,4 rE,01,04. 'SENSKE & ASSOCIATES INC , Ciyil-Engirweers/Land Surveyors 5. 104 Freya Ste. 203 Spokane, WA 99202 . (509) 534-5272 , . • 3Y 2273 3 BM 80�J 2- 101:83 2099.5 x2298 0 v 23/7 © 229/ x2287 1 x 2/00 2/05 Cult >- I 1 X,'/.31 W 'L *775 x2229 x 22/1 MATCH 5 x 22/9 r 224.5 2227_ p 2/275 JOHN W. ARRASMITH COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER 22/75 x ... x2 1 ©2262 D A'2254 /' .5!1317 C 28 N 254, 144.90 E 2,864,127.15 x2206 2105.74 SCALE : I= 200' z IC) N z w w 1 U) 0 a 2 Sec. Cor. N 254,139.79 E 2,864,670.23 N 254,000 N 252 N 251,000 REVISED N 254,000 N 253,000. N 252,000 N 251,00C 0 0 0 (IS co co N W N 1/2 Sec.26 09 N 2`i 8i6. 42 E 2,85'', 190. 40 u r Li I L 22 Sec. Cor. N 253,963110 E 2,859 x2 2286) x 26 � 232141 I 1/4 Cor. N 251,317.15 E 2,859,537.89 Compiled 0 0 0 2/12. 0 LD CO N x 0 0 O 0 C0 o w WALKER S ASSOCIATES, -------_ 0 0 _ o_ c0 co N w 0 O 0 N t0 co N OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPnKQ,NF COUNTY _ _ WASHINGTON MATCH TO SHEET NO. 2.3S 26 r. 254,0 .7.21 0 0 0 .. O CO N o AVE )ATE OF PH0T0GRAPHY -REVISED JUNE 1 984 C.I.: 5' SHEET 53 -26 -N r) H a 3 is . J 1 Ell er ' 9 TH AVI _PRAT _ AV 1 r i P O C3 0 I1 f — — 1 9 CI r 'I � i11- I 1 _____J 1 �-..:.2 2 v -? 2//9. . 1 - . X r r r r 'r r, rorNI r r r r r r r r r r if rr r r r r r r r r r r r 'rrrrrnrr r r rP r r r r r ` r r r r r r r rrr, rr r r r r r r r, r r r r r r r r , r r rr r r r r .r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r` r r r r r r r rrr rt.? rrr r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r rrr r r r rr r rr•f' r::: r n r r rr rr r r r r r r rlr r r rrrr r r r r r r r r r r r r r r rrrrrrrr,r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r .r r r r r r r r r r r r r r -- r r r r r r r r r r r . r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r rrrr rr rrrrrr rrrrrr r r rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr r rr rr r r r r - r r r r r r r r r r r rr r r r r r r rr r r rr r r r rrrr r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r k r r r r r r r r rr r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r- r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r -• �) 1,2 C `°}' O' 4 4' } 4' 4' a' 0 . . 20 A 1 . 3 , 0' 1 0 4, 4 Q' 4 0 4 X t �� ' 4�'Q0 , 40 0 p: 0 fib.• 0 ( Al 4, 0 0' r•r r r r r r r r r a a a °a0440''°4o4,a c} cr` q q�^ a •o1 0: ?' 4 , 0 Q , 4 , Q - Q' 4 C ? " f?' a 4' d' 4 4 0 O <} b Gam} ,S 4 4 a Q' q a 0' 4 G} G} K}' G} G} 7i r 4 -__. _ • 4 4 - 4 4 : '0 . ' 4 d' 4 - . \ • • 3o a 1 J4,' ' a 0 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r rr- rrrrr r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r - -` r' r- r r rr rr rr r r rr rr r r r r r r rr rr rrr r r 1 r r r rrr r r r r r r r ' r r r r rrr r r r r r r r r r rr r r r r r Q r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r rrr rr r r r r r r r r r r r r r r kr r r rr r Y �} rr r r rr r r r r ' < r r r r r r r r r r r r r r f r r rr r r rr r r r r rr rr r r r r r r r X 2c.)7B 0 <Y1(3:9' • : °'1; . 0,1'0,-0,- +B 4 7 ' 0 43' < 'v 4 ' , � : a d .4 , Q a } fy ;i I . 1e 3 ® 4 0 , 4 0: o' ° _ o o a a EY e 4 ®, GY' 0. 7 4' 48 a 4 ® a 0- 0- O a . 1 4 .a <a- t Q a' p� 4 - p) 4 4 , 4 4 y' s GT b 4 1 r0 C' O' Q 0. ' B' ti i:'- 4 <3 4 4 a' <} i i 0 :0- v Q a o.,( i(p 0 4 e? 4' C} <, 41 4 X'' 4 0/ i9JL - 8 TH \ \ \ x \ N. 1 2099 1 L1 L_ 1 r•r - 1 /' a/ I 1 L \/932 P5 , ALCOTT SCHOOL r • p • 3 • X `, N /9375 J U 0 U " 1 MATCH TO SHEET NC. 23 N p a, c3j*" o 0 1 \\12 f-1 x /94/ d C:) a 0 in n 9TH AVE, x T943 ,8M 61 • 93724L J L l - - X /937 C 1:::343 M . s ' . t /924 11 1 • x 11 � 1` x 1AnCIl.c CIC•TM: 2 00 C1 - • , C. I • , , e� f . t 1. 2 .O ) T I9474 s a t t 1 : VII CO -i.i. dT -1.�: f.-r ::_' ¢ # !'i `tl:- , T t Ej• t o . �� • • ? t :r. If t .R`. • • ; ,. 4J •i r., 1 =.tom, M U . E .... • • • c rt 1 n r,w C, _f. J t A •� t F • ( . te r; :.• ;; ' .�' -, _ - _: tp • :: .0 dj • .h .0 Di r • • I . j 'i } rS t om{ - S tr.. ;9 - : •i Wt. !'. 1 �\/. ...0 : liSV :J'c.L.t • - . :— I E s_ 4 ' s .. C3 C . • _ s • ' } � � t21 I . ! I • (� i . 7 O rt, ! Z i.) a • "--••••,•; , • • • d ., I • .. 3. 1•. L- :�' I yTp,,. 11 : ;-act!•— 5pECIAL • y • !u ? rt \., €t. ! y j ca. - , r I 113 . 1 j j i(P,l 41�1E,�: i' I: • 7 �_••_: aO `a`f A, i 1 a- 0 c 4 3 L:T , �_. 1. I — — - fit• • i 1— l J r `( r ,. li. • • • 512•1:::,14..-(p.; r I . /�� j ... ;.__ss s) I . • T • _ ... .. —_ -._ ._.,......._... _ _ ... _ __ ,- — _ __...._.._ .. - -. _ __. — _ _ _. _.._... a __... _ _ _. .. _ .> ,.._ • :- i... � 1 • /: .. ,1 .2 1 T • 1: �: 1 ; (( /• I': ' ` , a;:. g=am;:,, 1 .: -rOG: -2Ic.)O,G.3o • t I �.:,. , ! �;i'i�: ;J 'r::.�Wirtt... °:rfl)<?E: dt••lk:E:T:'- 5 t C;r f� "y:l X j: t,' +I' = s.,j•, _ j r •.¢ ;�,c: -. O �tr� `l t. E { »r L C: K. r, i i 61 i.l-t • ! t 5 l a . t 1.,-:... I • S.TA, . E `r'fr• , -"Li.`(''.. F;-t' , � 3 t45 1 RU r:. i • Y i�f, t ` r z i t { :J Cam._ j tl, ....<.,C. -t , t ,I ! L l , , tom __..._ • t . .,J. T• , • ( t,� � 1 r tt mie.)wx°rw•.u. .,_::x,.e,.n -.n 1 , I t f-# — • " a 1 t ' i. J , r: AS 4 4:.- - _ .. . . AP. W F' n - o . f�� \•1 r�SE'IdJil.l' ?vI :S r" ,c I wx. 'RADIUS P PER i I DRAWN l -2! . `3_ :`: ` !� SCALE CHECKED _ HORIZONTAL_ 1 <:,t:: APPROVED_ VERTICAL : I _: # .DEPARTMENT • ENGINEgRING :DI 'ISIO • , . KA L_X OA M) : Ptt:Et Icy TOP Q.' J•F'P 'F ''i !t,i'? l? POLE STA 1 ANE 40 a:.: . • '1,1 Di.\TLINA PUBLIC. • WORKS CITY OF ' SPOKANE, WASHINGTON rtiO ¢NIX. ® 7iaoo • •1 :N : \.. \ .' 1 t . • I...:.•. \ \ tc, cMP \ `• .. \' O.N. 'TEA-, . a• arieivir ., . . asxwzmen:L910L'3:sL4. .^S'C:.�.. L =_� '" :(SS@5. a .d T &M. TOP NCIT OF PER` II1 F h.M■.11" 'H NIC)RT( :\'t :.ST CORt4i[:_R GE= . I 4 Ti - kii1 i AO A ELt;.ct. = .2099: s5 C. T't DAcT u "s . 110 E . Ct txS3d'CFTC::kY^9T.•f.Cr' x.Yi :z±•�+v mi+[J. u�.cL1^^'e2:..S'4 �5..�.:5t2a21C'.w ^..4. • • PI RE HYD ME M �d23C.! .LG�iRSS�.s3::iCGT:IIFY. ^�1ThFtS =. 6 ' �.. R" ffit... LEDR.: GiSIWC=.Y32'V= ^••- '�f.�1�T••IhIDM". .ruuw - ' �' R�0.� :b . �LSCra v l ..a ' e�L ^ 445. x�i -gv:iS HI .:. �m •ry,�.,�. = . R 1 i REVISIONS cLEAN OUT t DRAWN CHECKED APPROVED ENGINEERING DIVISION DEPARTMENT.. OF I?llBLIC CITY: OF SPI,K '. ... I4 T :1- 1 vG - .tetra. r: �. ,� �' :caF "!? C.1 .:D�1•. � j • rPnriiau'tij t* • • 111111111111111151111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111.12111 MINIMI11111111111111111111•1111•11111M1111111111111111111111111111■1•111•111111 mEmEirEmlimEMMM,.. E l m.. T _ —` '' _ _ EMMEN Ma 7 —NEI L �' -_ s3jx ....=............. M -- - -j- l 0 0 ,9 ' „ -4- In m 1; ...... AM— ' ,_. , N ® _ _ -_ -- - IM QD • • •.x - .ai sasac.• ua.- can.szeuasn...z..rearawas. -- 2 e2 xsm seems rs••M : 'aanx rnsso-sr.,zrrsrs 1— �.-. y : - Q`' ,. - ' � _' - y. I .� c...) , -• i 3 . �i�. 1 1...y-1 ... ; .;. . I , 1 , - • .cD NilL.1`_) .4 t y< C'''' F- d' .,9 r:' i tD • • [t° O t , ..: . v �. N 6 III . . ? [ i y . .1 E� F' :2.0',.0 lar 1 . 1 �1 1. u) l" (1 a t3I . ,.Pr : '2o45.1.q. -f f .. ~ ?^ ;) .. s1 ow r •�it . <.i . sc) . . . . t,- Ii.J ..`_i A ..$ l71 %,' at ~n u .. -n-_r anmaxa r,a.. x+ •v - a- : ^4ssexcxcsrzt - -s ;eam • - A l.'P/.,• tt• •te t. • t 1 1 ,N -. Iv1. 0. . s . C ., b I - ... ' st 1.„•. Sr`oLAt-1 : Co.. S 3 m. :� t: . • -9 Y- U. W p . � .. die 1 1 tie,' 90 L11 ;••F I • cui tb1l_ T ¶ TI Iia.r,ri t4 .CUi: et:WAL `41-t-0 .4 rsair - ,mat:— rs-a._ -:m ;xi •coarse . .we •.•ng- •--ear • 14-TN Ave. 4 CoN�:'tRUCT T`<PE UF.:YN) (V•hlTt -% { t?ti 3 • RA ME REVISIONS • - - - - - -- 71 - -- - - - -- SCALE HORIZONTAL I {1 ° 50 1 VERTICAL .:I` " C: Ee' RAIL.R.OA), .:SPIK .: IN. TOF.' �A\'1EO OFF Po `v EL,P..: POLE: 41 40' LET ST A, I t+ 22 " 14- 'f r1 �•i t i ; . •Z485.2`1` :CITY :i7i 'f "t3.• i, DEPARTMENT OI=:. • PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING . DIVISION CITY . OF SPOKANE, WASHINGTON • - .. • CO _ • r . 4\ 2.1' { :i i1 _.. • .. r a wP , E,a,t I N Cs. _ .t. • ) irt • ' — • . ' • - . : 2 l SPECIA;_ CuR2 � � 2fl: GC ? �' E aa 1 IV: { r { f' 2 -- - - � i • • r '. Lt' —: I.h i. • t,} .:f h Cr) �a - I II). I 0 / I f G f ti 1 2j _. ? i i s_ a te.. {� Y � _max, ` -- V E :0:47 (11 :DA r' i , { CD h: G7 s, —_. .... ._.. s .... , ..1.si2 ' • k) ( +w ,O2 MO RILL ST, 3a e11µ ;�tve = I(;t 1i D , r. 1. r. WE"r_ Av • REVISIONS DRAWN CH.ECKED APPROVED F PUBLIC ; WORKS :......:.. CITY OF SPOKANE; WASHINGTON SPECIAL CURB INLET (Spokane City Standard'' #B -144A) WILBERT VAULT #'1840. ROADWAY STD CURB W/DROP... SLOPE = 1/4 in/ft. = 4 :: STD. CURB W/DROP IDEWALK `: iq' WIDE UTILITIES' 6 DRAINAGE EASEMENT 0'. WIDE UTILITIES; & DRAINAGE EASEMENT' CURB SLOPE = 1/4" `in /ft,'. SLOPE= 5: T . 0.G.- 0.3' ` BELOW GUTTER LINE !ROADWAY MAX, 2: 1 10' WIDE <UTILITIES & DRAINAGE EASEMENT OD TO GRADE IN SWALE 1'i' CURB SECTION 18' MAx: CENTER LINE SOUTH SIDE NORTH SIDE ROADWAY. DRYWELL 4 in CRUSHED ROCK TOP COARSE OF 5 8- in. MINUS W.S.H.D. 2 in ASPHALTIC CONCRETE CLASS B W.S.H.D SPE SLOPE= 1/4 in/ft. ASPHALT CONTENT 5 3/4% to 6 1/4% SLOPE= 4:1 TOP OF DAM. SIDE SLOPES= 8.33 1 R/W STANDARD CURB SIDEWALK. DETOUR 14TH AVENUE CLOSED HAVANA TO CARNAHAN DETOUR 14TH AVENUE CLOSED HAVANA TO CARNAHAN DETOUR 14TH AVENUE CLOSED HAVANA TO CARNAHAN 10' -WIDE UTILITIES & DRAINAGE EASEMENT I. 6' 4 in. CRUSHED ROCK TOP COURSE OF 5 .:.in. MINUS W.S.H.D. 2 in ASPHALTIC "CONCRETE CLASS 8 W.S.H.D. SPEC/. ASPHALT CONTENT 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% NOTE: ALL SIGNS MUST CONFORM TO M.0 T.C.D. AND SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS. SENSKE & ASSOCIATES, IN Engineersf L Sus S. 3009 Mt. Vernon and Suite 101 Spok ane, WA 99203 -4775 (509} 534 rveyor 5272 29.81' C2 1 1 01 3 0 1 m .-,1 1 N 1A ° o 11 - L--------- O 50.00' 59.79 to N N 1B --- 59.79' 3 O -- ,/ t() N 0) N c-4 --- 0 50.00' 2A - - 50.00' 2 I 3 m N ° 0 z - . N D) N - 59.80' 2B 59.80 m ° O O z N rn N ` -• 89' 3A 54.89' . 3 m Q) N 0 z ° 3 '� N m N 1 • 90' 3B 54.90' • 3 m ° O O z sin 0-1 m N v.-1 50. 00 4A __ 50.00' cn cn m ° o L 4 I '� N Q J N ___ 59.80` 4B ____ 59.80 _ 3 m ° O z � , N • N " 50.00' 5A 50.00' 5 3 cn m M N ° o Z N N r, 59.80' 5B 59.80' P 3 �, CG al 0) 0.) N N 0 c1 z I N 89.98' 6A N89' 56 ' 49 "W C3 © • i_ v ° 0 o (D 109.80' 6B 109.80' I I ° Im 1 J ftJa 1. caui: SCALE 1" =100' ( x _ 12 th AVENUE L1 10 ' J- PuCi1 -iC 1-)-r d c-1 co cu 3 N N 0) - - °O- CITY 12 th. AVENUE r 0 CU N CO 30' 1 cr) ( 30' N to 0 Cr) cr) z 0 0 0 -.w 0 to O co co CC 30' 22 23 In 0 m m 30' 27 26 WEST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 23 Fd P.K. nail and ,RP'S. Fd 'x' on curb NW Corner Havana & Hartson NW - 42.01 Fd "x' on curb NE Corner Havana & Hartson NE 39.85'; Fd. 'x' on Concrete Headwall of Storm Sewer SE 40.48' City Mon. 1.0' South & 0.4' West. 0 ' 30' Ln • O 0 (r) z 0 tf) CC LO 0 0 mom Cr) Z CT) l Q 1 > I < 1 0 to 1- CD cr) cr) c 1 - - -1 -- O , 0 (T) 0 m 30d L 100 0 to th. AVENUE 0 359:36' 359:36' WOODLA . I u) I • • 1 1 CO 1 359. 37 ' 1.3 th . AVENUE (Vacated) 209. 62 - r - - - - -- 209. 62 -- I 189. 82 PP 359.41' z - --1- - r - -1al -2 14 th. AVENUE 359.38' - 1 wlp 1�T1t..1TtE'> E_A.SE >.t�► t 15 th. AVENUE 359.40' 16 th. AVENUE SW CORNER SECTION 23-25-43. Fd. Granite Rock w /'x' in center wedged in top of 4" Tile Pipe. RP's to City ties. Fd. nail in Brass L.S. tag in NW Face of P.P. NE 82.68' Fd. Tack in Brass L.S. tag in So. face of P.P. NE - 33.25' Fd. Tack in Brass L.S. (#7317) tag in blazed 12" Pine sw - 35.08' -- 20 N 89 58'45' 130' 1 !BUILDING SETBACK LINE 0 Cr) Cr) A I 30' R/W DEDICATION - r t- -1 � 63 -1- 0 0 CC in . m _J 1-1 I O C 0 30' 301_ SOUTH 1/4 CORNER SECTION 23 Fd. 1/2" I.P. RP- N 45 W 38.29' to nail w /tag #706 in PP. RP- S 60 W 54.14' to cross in curb radius. AP- S 30 W - 55.34' to nail w /tag #706 in PP. S 89 59'25 0 10' POSLIC UTILITIEt EA5eme 14-r 1 -- 35.0.38 30- 0) 0 0 CURVE 1' 2 11 - 2634.00' 2631.78' (2636.9' REC.) 359.36' ( I I i 1 ;BLOCK N 89 56'48 'W _ 1 I I I I I I I i J 1 1 20;1 DRAT . 4.GE EIASEM E1f.1 i 109.801-- - 109 .80 _I_ 1 J. N 89 359.40' R i VIP D 359.41' N 89 ° 56'55 "W 2629.57' (2633.8' REC.) DELTA 89'27'21" 90'32' 47" 89'26'57" BEING A REPLAT OF BLOCKS 8, 9, & 10 AND PARTS OF BLOCKS 19 & 20 AND ADJOINING STREETS AND ALLEYS ALL IN THE SW 14 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 43 EAST, W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 130' 1 30' TERRACE 359.37 2 ° 56'44 "E 1048.1 - -= -209. 62 -T I-- - - - -1- 209.62 1 3 0) I i 1Z 1048.15 II) 0. O (r) J (r) 0) N 0 0 to 0 Cr) Cr) 1 1 I' I a 1 I 1 1 1 1 I ; I 1 °N --- 209. 63 - - -- -k -moo 1_._ I- - 209. E3 -0 - --� -- L - 1- - - - - -209. 63 - - - -+ - i 359.38' S 89'56'48 "E 658.77 0 0 - -- 109.79 -- 109. 80 - -- N 89 ° 56'49 W 658.78 in m 0) (XI 0 O z 3 m 0) N 0 O RADIUS 20.00 20.00 20.00 (0 m 0 m m W I I DVJOOU ' '' I F 20 ' DRAIIS EASE -4 I4T ( - -10' . 80 - (1) m 0) N 2 359.37' ARC 31.23 31.61 31.22 U7 (U 0) cu CENTER 1/4 CORNER SECTION 23 Fd. Brass Cap RP- S 60 E - 49.51' to tack in PP w /tag #16198 RP- N 60 W - 60.58' to tack in TP. RP- S 60 W - 29.40' to 'x' in rock. 359.36' V 0 uc 0 O (r) 5 I I I I I I I l 11 I i I i 1 ' 1 1 BUILDING SETBACK LINEI L 359.40' R/1 0 CC CC L -GE z° CC • CD 0 m m cc ( r ) 1 UJ 0 _1 30' 30 'L - POINTS FOUND AS NOTED. 359.41' TANGENT 19.81 20.19 19.81 20' BASIS OF BEARINGS The Bearing of N 00 ° 23'29 "W on the East Line of the SW 1/4 of Section 23 Township 25 North Range 43 East W.M. 0s per plat of KAHUI"'A HILLS 2 nd. ADDITION was used as the. BASIS OF BEARINGS for this subdivision. 0 - - -- 130' 30' r I I I I I 1O' Put31_t< I 1ST11.. IT 1:e_` I �s>_ �tiEl sr I 209.63 T 1 1 DRA1+4A E EASE 4-EJT 0 m R/W DEDICATION -89.98 6 1/2" REBAR SET W /CAP LS #16198 Rec = Per Plat OF WOODLAND TERRACE CHORD 28.15 28.42 28.15 0 m C3 w 0 (n (p on tf) 0 0 (r) W 0 0) (U 0 O C/) 0 to O O 0 O � cr, 0 I1) 0 (n m CHORD BRG N 45 ° 13'07 "W N 44'46'49 "E S 45'13'19 "E 1523.70 1522.53 I 0 1 >- I 0 l J I 1 J I -J 30' 30 - - -- 1521.34' 12' Fd. County Record Spike for Approx. 1Center line Intex I 1 1 .0 ' NORTH & 1 1 0.2' FAST OF TRUE LOCATION N 89 56' 48 "W 1521.92' � P Q w I ▪ n L - -- � r- -_J m ) N 89 ° 56'51 "W N BLOCK 2 1 0 L 1ST t 1_ Cr 11='5 r2 R N I LI CD 'K O CT) Cr) v O m m LOT 1 = LOT 2 = LOT 3 = LOT 4 = LOT 5 = LOT 1 = LOT 2 = LOT 3 = LOT 4 = LOT 5 = LOT 6 = N 0) co co N 3 on ( N 0 0 z AREAS PER LOT BLOCK 1 62908 62992 62992 62990 62992 14102 14191 14190 14191 14191 14106 SOFT. SQ.FT. So. FT. SO.FT. SQ.FT. SQ.FT. 80.FT. SQ.FT. SQ.FT. SQ.FT. SQ.FT. R/W DEDICATION H Z J W CO a c w n W w w 3 0 Z O H OC 0 0) w H 1- H J 1- 3o 0) N t 4,2 t 109.79' 109.79' 10' WIDE PUBLIC UTILITIES & DRAINAGE EASEMENT 109.80' 109.80 N89 ° 56'49 "W 10' WIDE PUBLIC UTILITIES & DRAINAGE EASEMENT 389 S89 °56'48 '- 109.79' 109.79 14th AVENUE Sot O 0 m O LU 658.77 109.,80 109.80' 718.77 109.80' 109.80' 658.78' D= TAIL_ WILDA00D - ERRAC BLOC- 2 1" = 50' 109.79' 109.80' 0 Cr) N In N 0) N 3 0 in 0) N 0 0 z 30' R/W DEDICATION 0 O cc 0 O J J H Z J W mW a 0) w w ° w 3 0 L O Q 0 (n w H N -J 1- SHEET 2 OF 2. SENSKE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil Engineers /Land Surveyors S. 3009 Mt. Vernon Suite 101 Spokane. WA 99203 -4775 (509) 534 -5272 209.62 - 1 -1 i 209.62 "I 209.62 209.63 - 0 m I - o ‘-i m o m o____ 0 _ - - - ' I 1 1 BUILDING SETBACK F - , -1 'ci - 0) [____N 1...---• 0 1 o 1 z I . 1 LINE ' r T . N --1 1 1 m 1 •n • 0) o._ __ __IN 0....... _____. ______• ' '0 1 1 1 I z BLOCK .1. ..-1 - • -1 0__.1 In 0... • I 0 m 4 .i -----1 1 . Nr 1110 -to m W. • . 10 I I z 1 . • 0_1____ 0 M -I-- 1 r 1 -1 0 n _ _ ..1 0 4 0 1 I I BUILDING SETBACK LINE 1 269.63 1 1 1 l• I 1 1 209.63 1 • 1 . 01 209.63 0 1 1 I 1 ■ I I I 1 1 209.63 loco" 00° wo w , ' SCALE 1"=100 •. AV( WIL 27 N 0 30' 0 , ) I Cr) u1 (T) 30' 30' cu 0 Lfl cE 30' 26 WEST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 23 Fd P.K. nail and RP'S. Fd 'x' on curb NW Corner Havana & Hartson NW - Fd 'x' on curb NE Corner Havana & Hartson NE - Fd. 'x' on Concrete Headwall of Storm Sewer SE City Mon. 1.0' South & 0.4' West. 0 12 th. AVENUE 30' I 30' 130 359.37' L_ 13 th. AVENUE (Vacated) 209.62 0 0 r 30' 30' 0 ‹1 0 kcl 359:36' 14 th. AV EN Li 1) 3!)93tl. 10 ) • - • _ C) ( 0-1 1 1 L. 0 0 M<M 22 23 0 359.41' 8 th. AVENUE NOOD 0 - r 16 th. AVENUE th. AVENUE- - 359.41' SW CORNER SECTION 23-25-43. Fd. Granite Rock w/'x' in center wedged in top of 4" Tile Pipe. RP to City ties. Fd. nail in Brass L.S. tag in NW Face of P.P. NE - 82.68' Fd. Tack in Brass L.S. tag in So. face of P.P. NE - 33.25' Fd. Tack in Brass L.S. (#7317) tag in blazed 12" Pine SW - 35.08' N 0 0 0 �u 0 F-4 CC 0 iI :E J 30' 301_ SOUTH 1/4 CORNER SECTION 23 Fd. 1/2" I.P. RP- N 45 W - 38.29' to nail w/tag #706 in PP. RP- S 60 W - 54.14' to cross in curb radius. RP- S 30 W - 55.34' to nail w/tag #706 in PP. S 89 59'25"W - 2634.00' 42.01' 39.85 ' 40.48' N 89 - 2631.29 359.36' AND 359.38' 0) 0 •,-1 1 109.79 z cu 0 L -L 6 --- 359.37' 89 3956'48"W 1048.15 0 LO 0) cij 1o9.80j IP) cu 0 0 109.80 Ln 0) cu f09.86 " u r i cu 0 0 z 109.80 2 8 z eo 0 B9.08 In 0) nj C3 0 •q 0) 0 T-1 109.80 0 N 89 5651"W 359.41' 3 359.41' (2636.9' REC.) 1048. N 89 - 2629.57' (2633.8' REC.) 30' rcr 0) (1 0 z. S 89 658.77 0 209.79 o I I m m i I cu .0 BLK ° z 109.79 0 0) 0 0 z 0 0 cc z cc • o co cot 111 _ _ 30' 30 _ CURVE DELTA RADIUS 1 89 20.00 2 90 3 8926'57" :0 20.00 BEING A REPLAT OF BLOCKS 8, 9, & 10 AND PARTS OF BLOCKS ALL IN THE SW I/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 30' RR cD cn 0 o) N 89 65870 \AI I LDWOOLI) 359.37' 359.38' 0 1/2" REBAR SET Rec = Per Plat OF WOODLAND TERRACE ARC 31.23 31.61 31.22 i109 111 NI N 0 ,109 E G 359.36' T CENTER 1/4 CORNER SECTION 23 Fd. Brass Cap RP- S 60 E - 49.51' to tack in PP w/tag #16198 RP- N 60 W - 60.58 to tack in TP. RP- S 60 W - 29.40' to 'x' in rock. L 359.40' 4 ND: T POINTS FOUND AS NOTED. W/CAP LS #16198 359.41' TANGENT HI BASIS OF BEARINGS The Bearing of N 00 on the. Eat L1.5 SW 1/4 of Section 23 Township 25 North Horg 4 F,arf es per plat of KAHUNA HILLS 2 nd. ADDITIOv (i(J BASIS OF OF BEARINGS for this subdivisiun. 0 ( 1) 0 0, CHORD 2E1.15 15 0 130' 0 0 (1) 0 -1(11 r ---- 30' Cr) (r) in I • I m I \?-\ w - 0 0 `' i in 0 . m Fd. County Record 0 Spike for Approx. c) Centerline Intex 0) I from true 0 x\ 0 \?-- m ID N 89 56 ' cu c.) 00 o � CD >- 101 _J 30' 30• 1_____ 1523.71' 1561.82' L location. N 89 56 48 1522 . 2 1521.34' CHUHD BHG N 45 • 41'4649"E • ,45'13 1521.93' BLOCK 1 LOT LOT LOT UT _ I BLJCK 2 LOT 1 LOT LOT L OT LOT LOT co CD 0 Cr) Cr) - w I (T I I w 1 m , 1 1 I a) (kJ 1 m I CV1 , ZD ,_. 0 0 cc AREAS PER 1 = 62908 2 = 62992 3 - 62992 4 - 62990 - 62992 LOT SO . FT. SQ FT 0 . ET . FT SO.FT. = 14102 S1.4.FT. 2 = 14191 SO.FT. 3 = 14190 SO.FT. 4 = 14191 SO.FT. 9 - 14191 SO.FT. 6 = 14106 SO.FT. 19 &2O TERRACE AND ADJOINING STREETS AND ALLEYS. RANGE 43 EAST, W. M. SENSKE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil Engineers/Land Surveyors S. 3009 Mt. Vernon Suite 101 Spokane, vv A 99203-4775 (509) 534-5272 44- O 0) -209.62- -` t -- r--- r-- -r- - -- I I 1 1 3 I t'7 - rn __- r - - - - -- 209.62 -- - 1 - - -� 1 1 1 1 'c 1 1 ..-1 1 j to O - - r - - cc. - — 1 - p I 1 - 209.62 1 ' 1 - - r -- - 1--- -r - - -r j 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 I t 1 I I j- I � j 1 # i 1 1 / 13 I I 20' I DRAT WAGE I" „I i ElASEMEII.,IT I r to I I I I - - I. I I I m 0 --L - -• - - -1(U ° - -r - - - T - - -I 1 I I 1 I om , I 1 1 I i I BLOCK 1 IZ 1 I i - - - ' 1 -7- 2 0 9 . 6 2 - - - - ; - - - - -- 209.63,... 1 o ---„--c-I m I I 1 Tzo to . • --1 O. _I to • O r -r -- T 1 1 I 1 1 I 13 E D E A M AGE 1 V I I I I m �_ -j(U. -. I 1 1 1 in • 0 ° -- -r - - -r- I I i I O I 1 I I, 20 DRAIN E I EASEM N I I I _1--- -� 1 t - - 0 O --►; w - o) I- - {U (U ___ _ -i_ -- - - - ° -1 - - i________•1 l I , l o , I I I I i I Z T BUILDIN6 SETBACK LINE 1 -, - - -• i o I co I I m I 1 I - --,• 1 t o m 1 1 I I i I z 1 I 1 '1- - - -1 I I i i 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 i BUILDING SETBACK LINE1 ' ioo �- 1 ► I I om 1 1 1 1 Z; 1 i 1 _ 1- � C 1 - I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 - -1 - -- 189. 82 - - -I- I I i I L - -1 m 1 ( I I i 1 i -- ; 1 I I I; 1 I I I I; 1 --- 1---- 209.63 I -� I I i 1 1 - -1 - -- I I 1 1 of - 209. 63 - - w I I -- a -- 1 I' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I L- 1-- - - -- 209.63 ---- =•I_ L fL. 2318 t� DA ' ,/946 _ . • -� \\ W.L. 1 997 _\ rJ 2, n/ x 2298 0 // 2009.5 x2287 2244 2064 x 2329 x GRAVE L PI T 2(6'3 075 © 2/06 % • / 1i' ,D ' ` • 5'! 11 2.4 9. ' . ) lr12.x0.9 — v. — �r - — mil - -.- ._. ■ ,7 I /r Cu ttivoted AVE. 2 047 \, x Cult. 2t G 5 (( 2/20 C'j\\ Cultivated r // / uftivated 2/9/ • CuRivaled /946.5 ` 2;. 7 /9745 NN NN N N E Yom' Pool O r x2/ Cultivated 219/.5 x 22/9 — 1 x 96'5 Cultivated Areo x 202/ A 2, 42 �x224j 22/75 x x ?2." _8 TH t AVE. PRA TT AV 1 • 4 4 27j Lam` -�' 2119.5 x / CIO El *0 x /92 . x1930 8 T x /431 A 1 n ! , U f1 C.., Q { .� .� ' \\ / \\ \\\.) r9rK Scattered /11140 I 1 9 x o/ x ;`93' lot fa kv ALCOTT SCHOOL C r :4 Y /9375 ; J r ‘23 /94 .. D 1 I LJ to LJ U L MATCH TO SHEET NO. 27, N ? > 195 0 /94/ BM61 w 1 ( 3 200' 2('05 5 C �./ C l l ��. y _ _ /9655 • (:I /968 x Y om, C L I4TH .-_ -t 0 II / 242 • ■ 31 r\ 225 22_'? /93©. ' /955 5 x /.9975 SCALE 1' 100' 20 64:5 ALCOTT SCHOOL AT TO S EET . C8 N 255,981.27 E 2,859,3.37 57 ° 1 1 _y.22 T V AVENUE WEST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 23 Fd P.K. nail and RP'S. Fd 'x' on curb NW Corner Havana 6 Hartson NW 42.01', Fd 'x' on curb NE Corner Havana 6'Hartson NE - 39.85' Fd. 'x' on Concrete Headwall of Storm Sewer SE 40.48' City Mon. 1.0' South & 0.4' West. Cll N co In 0 z coO 1- U H CJ -0 - 0 30' 30' O 0 c) w 3 tr) N OQ) m N Cr): 4 Z O CO - -I- tU - -- th. AVENUE 14 th. AVENUE 1 359. ' T R/W DEDICATION 1 1 1 ' to w IvS. - - Pu3l..le_ Lyrii._IT%E.'S E_-- IAt.1 =uT 15 th. AVENUE 359.41' 16 th. AVENUE SW CORNER SECTION 23- 25 -43. Fd. Granite Rock w/' x' in center wedged in top of 4" Tile Pipe. RP's to City ties. Fd, nail in Brass L.S..,tag in,: NW Face of P.P. NE - 82.68' Fd: Tack in Brass L.S. tag in So. face of >P.P.: NE 33.25' Fd. '`Tack in Brass L.S. ( #7317) tag in blazed 12" Pine SW.- 35.08' SOUTH 1/4 CORNER SECTION 23 Fd. 1/2" I.P. RP- N 45 W - 38.29' to nail w /tag #706 in PP. RP- S 60 W - 54.14' to cross in curb radius. RP- S 30 W - 55.34' to nail w /tag #706 in PP. N 89 58' 45 'W - 2631.7B' 359.36' I 07 I- - - -N O 1 1 '' I Z BUILDING ?SETBACK LINE [0 F13Sl. C UTILITIES EASEME ) 1 -- 359.37 - - - - --1 89 "E 1048.11 - 209.62 T T I 1 1 11 `f' I / 13 20 I DRAI IJ4GE °� E1 E1}.1 T tf) L I I I - I 0_�' -_ - -i u 1O I I � -- - 209.63 - - -- ` 89'56'48 "W 1048.15 - 2634'.0 CURVE DELTA 1 B9.27'.21 2 90'32'47" 3 89.26 ' J7 ". V\I F 1 IDVJOO[TJ T�RF�AC BEING A REPEAT OF BLOCKS 8, 9, & 10 AND PARTS OF BLOCKS 19 & 20 ALL IN THE SW 1 /4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 43 EAST, W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY,. WASHINGTON RADIUS 20.00 20.00 20.00 209.62 I I 209.63 359 36' 359.37' 0 CENTER 1/4 CORNER SECTION 23 Fd. Brass Cap R P - 60 E - 49.51`' to tack in PP w /tag #16198. RP- N 60 W - 60.58' to tack in TP. RP- S 60 W - 29.40' to 'x' in rock. ,--- -T- - - -, -• S 89'56'48 "E 658.77 . - 109.801 - 109.79- to I I co to I 12 in I l m ( 1 m N I Tn. I m N N I I of I la I I o a) rn N •I I 0) 1 1° of 1 I Io" B LK o`-`21'2 I o - I o n 1 z , z I I z - 169.80 1080 - -0 - (109.80 - 0 ; - 109 N 89'56'4"W. 658.78 359.40' 359.41' BASIS OF BEARINGS The Bearing of N 00 on the East Line of the SW 1/4 of Section 23 Township 25 North Range 43 East W.M. as per plat of KAHUNA HILLS 2 nd. ADDITION was used as the BASIS OF BEARINGS for this subdivision. DRAIN G EASEM NT POINTS FOUND AS NOTED: 1/2" REBAR SET W /CAP LS #16198 Rec = Per Plat OF WOODLAND TERRACE R/W DEDICATION 209.63 -� - -I BUILDING SETBACK LINEI 1 I ' -_ L -I- - -- 209.63 - - - - --' 1523.70 1523.12' Spike for Approx. 1Cen.0' ter line Intex I. U) 1 NORTH 6' 1 0.2' EAST OF TRUE': LOCATION \ _) N 89 56'48 "W 1522.53' r 7 .... r - 1 ?Ai LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 • 62908 = 62992 • 62992 = 62990 = 62992 BLOCK 2 LOT 1 = 14102 LOT 2 = 14191 LOT 3 = 14190 LOT 4 = 14191 LOT 5 = 14191 LOT '6 = 14106 SENSKE & ASSOCIATES, I NC. Civil Engineers %Land'Surveyors S. 3009 °Mt. Suite .;101 Spokane, WA 59203 - 4775 (509) 534.5272 209 3.) - 1,o1 6 1.1 (\ LAth, 1955 1111111111011111NEMINSINUIDMOBBIPMMEMIlTINIENNIENIONNONO 0 x 1114,7 x /958',7 1`15 %.? �v1 2 HEAVY "O DO NOT , `. :fix ;; � - f� ,.. i C ; MEET VERTICAL PEUFIC,A HONS. Co(7 Al r /v 12 r': ,, f' q L TOPOGRAPHIC MAP PREPARED BY & ASSOCIATES INC Nurnbzr: t S��l q' A SsoC , 1: ::!e. / b oa n' C nt ur Interval: 2 Date of Photography:.