The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1469C-840LAr Al /+AA e E V ar5 r CGh b 0I n( 3 1 - A/n /- E l i'6O / C Alt ttn H@te o t= .Lots ✓ I ( 1. 7 C/fer./c, Fee 1131,° 6 K A /s, .r re/ "Area 44i OK 'cc Alta o Led. Eiv o o K 43 "gm Der Se.vtr /nr6 s 0 K P'-41 tLoc,s »ewses- 777-... 0 k 0 FFiu4t Sa amsrveG LY�rc 0 K ,SiRvefrors 1'.eteriP,r.s we D� ,to,+c Nil-.. 5 - o V- /en • 4 a ui.ortss ©I( ijo.rn c 6rur 1E� O L Lor f 4.,cz'valisrs o K_ tAu DED/C.terret• fil6n'.Vcto 0 K / Foor srr/Pr fl K 3 .e ,o e... GLo rnAtte r&es d 'K n ate r /�// Ae �lIA Lo 7 %et S © (< A lrif !W/i/.e/{ 1\i/ A CLOSVCE oC /iNO /1fi 7 /QUO s,e, Pr, of-1 .n c. © k / rr .trt2 Pi © K=-- .57to o/Co.4r Al U g_ Rio-CRP srarFinnr /V/A "lee es s Dien Min .r ' n j E U eAt, re- en.. A p a 0-1 © k 'R/t-/ DER ICA-T 1 n,v (5) t..._ DA /Ae.46, R LANC,,/AG 6 See ?/ f M /- a Aly4 r � K— o we,t 4 E FL-e300 heAn, � /" !A Pewte-rr Rn.4n Dor. tei 1(1 / A Pt cj.vrs, LostO WA" Anna, N/ A a,.n MPR s 0 C L.t.2 3 9 D e c..* 1 p r, o ,.+ eel o f l OwnieRSt+(ps e i, 1 Ro,qrp Pg-4NS $ /7-ei I ©K £ o ,V • D b t,) elL i R Mlles (MEw) 1 o, I(o 3.R (t - c-- T rM,' AteeA 4c- KI40 wc.ED 6 eMetvrs , s1sA/ED By FM6,4,GE1 g'1-8 67 t:c) I J Project Name Project File Sponsor's Name Engineer /Surveyor's Name Date Submitted 5- /Lc 0 Number pat f/ c Telephone # Description 9 12 -0 8 Z-- Initials AFF-et 4/14,4 g LA , �.. I1O JA, / ,Q,nJ s- hA A k u s uo„,A RESOLUTION NO. 96 0925 IN THE MATTER OF ESTABLISHMENT OF BOLIVAR ROAD IN EVERGREEN POINT THIRD ADDITION NO. 1469 -C COUNTY ENGINEER'S ROAD FILE NO. 2136 ww� BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This being the day set for the hearing on Spokane County Engineer's Report on the proposed establishment of BOLIVAR ROAD, proceedings for which were initiated by PRELIMINARY RESOLUTION NO. 96 -0847, and it appearing to the Board on proof duly made that Notice of Hearing was published and posted in the manner and for the time required by law, and the Board after examining the report and maps of the Spokane County Engineer and all claims and papers on file and after hearing all other evidence adduced at the hearing; and IT FURTHER APPEARING that the rights of way have been dedicated as public road, 50 feet wide, and that said road is a public necessity and the same should be opened and established as County road. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners or Spokane County, Washington, that the hereinafter described road as reported by the Spokane County Engineer on the 24h day of September, 1996, being more particularly described as follows: BOLIVAR ROAD - 50 feet wide, from the south right of way line of 26th Avenue to the south line of Lot 6 Block 5 (one foot strip) in Evergreen Point First Addition. Located in the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 26, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M. in Evergreen Point Third Addition. and as shown by the records and maps on file in the Office of the Spokane County Engineer be and the same hereby is established as County road and the same shall be known as BOLIVAR ROAD, Road File No. 2136. The road supervisor of the road district in which the said road is located is hereby directed to open and maintain the same for public use and travel. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the one foot strip described as follows is hereby dedicated for public road purposes: I \v4akrt4Q136 di,Icngr4tcrnn Lot 6 Block 5 in Evergreen Point First Addition APPROVED BY THE BOARD this 24th day of September, 1996. ATTEST: • LLIAM E. DONA ERK OF THE BOAR CONtAfi PNe co ` t ° G m 4. zakt I BY ∎ ' " ///!s i��,�i� /� • R • SANNE MONTAGU DE' UTY Return to County Engineer Right of Way Department 4039451 Page: 1 of 1 0912611996 03:43P Spokane Co, !A RESOLUTION - ESTABLISHMENT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Mira .ra I LIP '• HARR_ CHAIRMAN . _f. ' 1 .4( 1 � /_ • ' I' ROS I LEY / 1 STEV HASSON ti Agreement Number PRIORITY FEE AGF.'EEMENT This agreement between Spokane County and CrOR S V 41 , I ^ C whose interest in the project Is _Qk_,V_ELoP /=4, Qk//,'/ It is entered into this ';fk day of _ (n0 , 19_1121. This agreement is applicable to the project known as: EVfrjA g a it' L ) That the individuals and parties named herein as having an interest in the above described property or project agree to the following: 1. They request that priority review be given to their project. They agree to reimburse Spokane County for project review fees as specified in Board of County Commissioner's Resolution 80- 1592 attachment C, as amended. The fees will be based on overtime costs incurred by Spokane County for project reviews plus a ten percent administrative charge, and will be billed monthly as accrued. 3. The undersigned agrees that these fees are due and payable upon receipt of the billing as specified above. The monthly billing should be sent to the attention of: _s t o k �cn e_ I �Z __ __ Re) _ALL" 1 understand that failure to pay these fees may result in delay in completion or approval of the project or other possible sanctions. /ilk / j< 0 e) cf,0 /4 -* /e-A/t Barto Berger Conners - - Faire Hage1 2208 _ Hagel 2210 Larson Powell Rickey Robison 3019.40 + 53.00 Gemmi l ,2S9 y 3)2442,40-+ 26.00 La Durheim (St. 3) 2128.68 + 53.00 Degenstein 2208 2352.76 + 53.00 Degenstein 2210 2472.70 + 53.00 Wainwright 2208 2237.68 + -39:00 53 Wainwright 2210 2352.26 + 39-.00 53 aryl - ren 2128.68 + 13.00 Olander St. 3_ 2128.68 + 51.0_ Ri Jones 2,23 ?. 6 $ '28. o + 53,00 Inch - 212838 + 53.99 Waltz 2128.68 + 53.00 Degon (La) 2128.68 + 53.00 Seaver 2128.68 + 39.00 Michelbook 1128.68 t_39 00 Sa Storey 2128.68 Mills 2128.68 + 39.00 Nolan 2128,68 + 26c00 3 ti Zielke 2128.68 + 26.00 - Wiegele 2128.68 + 13.00 Roberts 2128.68 + 26.00 Evans 2128.68 + 26.00 Hester ..2.2,3 W 2128,68 + 39.00 Dishneau 2128.68 + 26.00 '? 3 - _ - - -- 2666..01 ± 2 .0 _ Tanner Hester 2210 2)52& 2237 8 + 19 39 IN 2128.68 = 12.281 2128.68 + 13.00 = 12.356 2128.68 + 26.00 = 12.431 _2128.68± 39..00 = 12.506 2128 68 + 53 00 = 12 587 2237.68 + 13.00 = 12.985 2237.68 + 26.00 = 13.060 2237.68 + 39.00 = 13.135 2237.68 + 53.00 = 13.215 Schaeffer 15.146 Overtime 1.5 X Average Base Rate 2875.52 + 13.00 3019.40 + 53.00 2599.32 + 53.00 3336.58 + 53.00 2599.32 + 53.00 2732.42 + 53.00 2732.42 + 39.00 3019.40 + 53.00 2732.42 + 53.00 /a. .3s` Base Pay " '2 divided by 2080 = Extra Time La. Durheim - Same as above 22.434_ 17.725 15.302 19.555 15.302 16.070 15.989 17.725 16.877 17.725 14416' /S. / '/L 12.587_ 13.87] 14.571 13:1-35t5. 1,4796 8 12.356 12.587. 12,587 12.587 12.587 12.506 12.506-,2.5t7 12.281 12.506 12 43 -1 / -a. 5 12.431 12.356 12.431 12.431 12,506 /3. /3S 12.431 15.52 12.356 -131 Olander t_72 hr.___2128.68 + 53.00 = 15.151 80 hr. 13.635 88 hr. _ 12.39 90 hr. 12.120 , .22-k 2... 96 hr. ._. _ 11.363 y8,17 28-Q_ //. 3r _ 70 ,/-L . /. -/ 9v,4t.- 11. /90 1) 2) 3 ) 4) DRAINAGE_ ITEMS 1) Drywell - Type A 2) Drywell - Type 8 3) Grate - Type 1 4) Grate Type 2 5) Grate - Type 3 6) Backfill For DW 7) Concrete Inlet 8) C.M. Pipe 10" Dia. 9) C.M. F'ipe 12" Dia. 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. 11) 0. M. Pipe 18" Dia. . 12) Precast Manhole 13) Solid lid 14) Ditch Excavation 15) Sod NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Rock Sumps (rock) 2) Special. Curb Inlets 3) 4) 5) 6) 16) Monuments 17) Barricade 18) Street Signs 19) Rough Grade 20) Top Course 21) Base Course 22) Asphalt Concrete 23) Curb Type A 24) Curb Type B 25) Curb Type R 26) Sidewalk NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS BOND ESTIMATE. PROJECT Evergreen Point 3rd PE1469C GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK NAME JS UNITS EA EA EA EA EA C Y EA LF LF LF LF EA EA C Y SF C: y EA DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL EA LF EA OTHER SUBTOTAL C Y C Y CY Tons LF LF LF SD YD QUANITY PRICE 1 1250.00 3 1450.00 2 310.00 330.00 4 320.00 150 11.25 2 575.00 129 12.00 16.50 18.00 21.00 1435.00 300.00 62 8.50 5200 0.50 1201 400.3 469 1418.7 268.24 163.92 10 11.25 2 400.00 3 140.00 32.00 3 75.00 GRADING AND SURFACING GRAND TOTAL DATE 11•- Aug-89 8.50 10.60 10.60 40.00 5.60 7. 10 6.50 14.00 COST 1250.00 4350.00 620.00 0.00 1280.00 1687.50 1150.00 1548.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 527.00 2600.00 112.50 800.00 0.00 0.00 11,8(1 0.00 15925.00 420.00 0.00 225.00 645.00 10208.50 4243.18 0.00 18760.00 7944.72 1904.50 0.00 2294.88 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 45355.78 (/ 4 E 1'325.78 Non Standard Drainage Items B OND EST FORM � A NAME (�44.l PROJECT L_ 7r ve/ e`i' Y\ A r� L J Drainage items Units Quantity Item // 1) Drywell - Type A EA 2) Drywell - Type B EA 3) Grate - Type 1 EA 4) Grate - Type 2 EA 5) Grate - Type 3 EA 6) Backfill for DW CY 7) Concrete inlet EA 8) C.M. pipe 10" dia. LF 9) C.M. pipe 12" dia. LF 10) C.M. pipe 15" dia. LF 11) C.M. pipe 18" dia. LF 12) Precast Manhole EA 13) Solid Lid EA 14) Ditch Excavation CY 15) Sod SF Pa ge 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 96/4 Jkott vl IA / (vir .Ln le-/S DATE Price Cost ,- /O Std Bdl Dwl Conc 0 Dia _Dia _Dia OTHER Dwl Dwl BRF Inlet Pipe Pi.p'e Pipe / y i (73/ ./ / - / // 404 — S / 50 r /...-59 At-) g'<- I S - r t 1. / r /pie_ X31 , 3a : \ v, G+ 31xa ( _ / 638, Arm 38� - 5(1)/- a (� • SYL4 A c . 5Y6 C .- -)3 a6 Y 3 i _ -2d A .23 J 06 X a _ t (, G- - a -4, -d G x. D 6 = br 6 /6 / in _" -0-1 t Sa -oo PROJECT N0.- DESIGNER- JS DATE- 8/11/89 PROJECT DESCRIPTION- Evergreen Point 3rd PE 1469C STREET 4 1 NAME - BOLIVAR ROAD LENGTH- 298.50 FT. WIDTH- 36.00 FT.. BEGINNING STATION = 1736.59 ENDING STATION = 2035.09 TERM 4 1 : CROSS STREET EXCLUDED EW 9.00 PW 9.00 SK 0.00 RAD 20.00 TERM 4 2 : CHOPPED ITEM SURFACE AREA - ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB TYPE A EXISTING ITEM ITEM SURFACE AREA - ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB TYPE A EXISTING STREET, QUANTITIES is MEASUREMENT QUANTITY 9378.00 S.F. 1.00 FT. 0.33 FT. 0.00 FT. 0.17 FT. 0.00 FT. 347.3 C.Y. 115.8 C.Y. 0.0 C.Y. 118.7 TONS PROPOSED 521.0 FT. STREET 4 2 NAME- BOLIVAR CT LENGTH- 120.00 FT. WIDTH- 36.00 FT. BEGINNING STATION = 2035.09 ENDING STATION = 2155.09 TERM 4 1 : CROSS STREET EXCLUDED EW 9.00 PW 9.00 SK 0.00 RAD 20.00 TERM 4 2 : CHOPPED SURFACE AREA- 2952.00 S.F. ROADWAY EXCAVATION 1.00 FT. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE 0.33 FT. CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 0.00 FT. ASPHALT CONCRETE 0.17 FT. CURB TYPE A EXISTING 0.00 FT. MEASUREMENT QUANTITY STREET 4 3 NAME- 26TH AVE LENGTH- 434•.00 FT. WIDTH- 36.00 FT. BEGINNING STATION = 0.00 ENDING STATION = 434.00 INTER 4 1 T INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 36.00 Sri: = 0.00 RAD = 20.00 INTER 4 2 T INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 36.00 SK. = 0.00 RAD = 20.00 TERM 4 1 : CROSS STREET EXCLUDED EW 5.50 PW 12.00 SK 0.00 RAD 30.00 TERM 4 2 : CHOPPED MEASUREMENT QUANTITY 15463.36 S.F. 1.00 FT. 4.33 FT. 0.00 FT. 0.17 FT. 0.00 FT. 109.3 C.V. 36.4 C.Y. 0.0 C.Y. 37.4 TONS PROPOSED 164.0 FT. 572.7 C.Y. 190.9 C.Y. 0.0 C.Y. 195.7 TONS PROPOSED 733.7 FT. STREET 4 4 NAME- EVERGREEN ROAD LENGTH- 270.00 FT. WIDTH- 13.00 FT BEGINNING STATION = 1885.09 ENDING STATION = 2155.09 ONE SIDE_ ONLY PWIDTH= 24.00 EWIDTH= 11.00 ()WIDTH= 0.00 Mr: Jerry Simms Spokane County }Engineers Spokane.,, Washington 'Dear /Jerry,: ws /wrs Vintage S yle Of L 'ving would 'like to request at this time a bond reduction for Evergreen Point 3rd There were three (3) .. items. left on 'Randy : s: "'punch'rlist and all of.,them have been fulfilled_: I notified Randy'to „inspect again to make'sure and he did soon this date, July•9`y 1991. ' bond should be ,re'leased.in'it' entirety, leaving no balance. Thanking you and - trusting that you will,get thisca>;h bond released immediately; I•am, - Sincerely yours, 7 - Bill Smith W.R.S. & Associates Inc P.O. Box 14084, Spokane, Washington 99214 Bus. (509) 922 -0782 Site (509) 922 -0450 3 /49 1991 444444:97 OFFICE OF Till: COUNTY ENGINEER • Ronald C. I1ormann, P.E., County Engineer US Bank Valley Financial Center 'E ° 9208 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 RE: Evergreen Point 3rd Addition PE 1469C Dear Sir or Madam: N. 8 1 I lellerson A DIVISION OFilili PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott,-M., Director Please be advised that the savings accou No. i167-415866 issued by your company as security for roadwa;• improvements and' sewers in the above mentioned subdivision, in the current amount . of 511,000.00 may be now be reduced to 53,000.00. If you have any questions, feel free to call our office. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer (Jerry =:i ms Plat Inspector JUL 1, 81 - 9bly . SPOKANE COUNTY Y ENGINEER 1 v X c cc: W. R. S. and Associates, Inc. l/N�w•� _4Q Spid,.ene WA 00 200 -j 180 (50 '.o-3o00 f,\R I50 150 -4715 • "IVED ^.CORDED 4 oi ?H'90 i }G`iAHUE TOR UHTY.wASH. BY 2004o 90(12260307 UM( 0 9 3 PAGE 9 0 6 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON C7A t• RESOLUTION NO. 90 0153 IN THE MATTER OF ESTABLISHMENT OF STREETS IN EVERGREEN POINT 2ND AND 3RD ADDITIONS COUNTY ENGINEER'S FILE NO. 2136 This being the day set for the hearing on Spokane County Engineer's Report on the proposed establishment of STREETS IN EVERGREEN POINT 2ND AND 3RD ADDITION, proceedings for which were initiated by PRELIMINARY RESOLUTION No. 90 -0053, and it appearing to the Board on proof duly made that Notice of Hearing was published and posted in the manner and for the time required by law, and the Board after examining the report and maps of the Spokane County Engineer and all claims and papers on file and after hearing all other evidence adduced at the hearing; and IT FURTHER APPEARING that the rights -of -way have been dedicated as public roads, 50 feet wide, and that said roads are a public necessity and the same should be opened and established as County roads. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the. Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, that the hereinafter described roads as reported by the Spokane County Engineer on the 13th day of February, 1990, being more particularly described as follows: ATTE BOLIVAR ROAD - 30TH COURT 26TH AVENUE BOLIVAR COURT All as shown on the Plats of Evergreen Point 2nd and 3rd Additions in the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 26, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M. and as shown by the records and maps on file in the office of the Spokane County Engineer be and the same hereby are established as County roads and the same shall be known as BOLIVAR ROAD, 30TH COURT, 26TH AVENUE AND BOLIVAR COURT, No. 2136. The road supervisor of the road district in which the said roads are located is hereby directed to open and maintain the same for public use and travel. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Lot 6 Block 2, Evergreen Point Addition No. 1469, be dedicated for County road purposes and the County Engineer is directed to cause a copy of this resolution to be recorded in the Office of the County Auditor. PASSED ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, this 13th day of February, 1990. ILLIAM E. DONAHUE LERK OF THE D E P T Y RESOLUTION - ESTABLISHMENT ) from Lot 6 Block 8 (1 foot strip) Northerly to the North line of Evergreen Point 2nd Addition - from the West right -of -way line of Bolivar West to and including cul-de -sac - from the East right -of -way line of Evergreen Road East to Lot 3 Block 12 (1 foot strip) of Evergreen Point 3rd Addition - from the North right -of -way line of 26th Avenue to Lot 2 Block 11 of Evergreen Point 3rd Addition ED FILED •• RECORDED REQUEST nr FEB 26 4 ox PH 90 !AAHUE JiTOR SPOY,l.K , COUNTY. WASH. SAMPSON: BOARD 0 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPO E COUNTY, WASHINGTON Patricia Stev Hasson John R. McBride ummey, Chair C 0 U NI "I Y OFGICIi Of Till: COUNTY ENGINEER • Ronald C. Dormant), P.E., County Engineer US Bank Valley Financial Center E 9208 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 RE: Evergreen Point 3rd Addition PE 1469C Dear Sir or Madam: cc: W. R. 5. and Associates, Inc. N. 31 I letiernm Spokane, 4V.\ 9 -0150 A DIVISION OE THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, I'Ji, Director November 26, 1991 Please be advised that the savings account No. 1167- 415866 issued by your company as security for roadway improvements and sewers in the above mentioned subdivision, in the current amount of $3,000.00 may be now be released. If you have any questions, feel free to call our office. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer erry Sims Plat Inspector (50o) 150 -3000 FAX 150 150 -.1715 TO OEP MENTAL CORRESPON . ^ JUICE '7r FROM SUBJECT f — 5 -`✓'er /'G DATE if- Z'r/ Lert- 4-4- re-lac S, /UI & 4it 1/6 7 -4/ 5 ` d6 cloS ar 2 3 DEP'T DEPT - LITHO IN USA OFFICE or TI 1E COUNTY ENGINEER • Ronald C. liormann, P.E., County Engineer US Bank Valley Financial Center E 9208 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 RE: Evergreen Point 3rd Addition PE 1469C Dear Sir or Madam: cc: W. R. S. and Associates, Inc. A DIVISION Or TIE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director July 11, 1991 Please be advised that the savings account No. 1167- 415866 issued by your company as security for roadway improvements and sewers in the above mentioned subdivision, in the current amount of $11,000.00 may be now be reduced to $3,OOO.00. If you have any questions, feel free to call our office. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer 0 .644 1 -' 7 . Derry ✓Sims Plat Inspector N. RI I Iollr rsoi1 Spakanc, L 9 °2u0 -Oi$O (50 0 ) .I S° -3000 LAX I50 .15o -1715 O F F I C E O F T H E C O U N T Y E N C IFV E E R TO: Tom Yake FROM: Jerry Sims SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON SUBJECT: Evergreen Point 3rd PE 1469C DATE: July 10, 1991 We have received a request from the sponsor to reduce /release the bond for the above mentioned project. Please review this at your earliest possible convenience and notify me of the amount, if any, we need to retain in order to assure the completion of the project. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. cc: Ross Kelley C ciphp 7 / 0 i/91 R5 4 r- 100 `n4 SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE Dear Sir or Madam: US Bank Valley Financial Center E 9208 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 RE: Evergreen Point 3rd Addition PE 1469C cc: W.R.S. &Assoc., Inc PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 October 12, 1989 Please be advised that the savings certificate No.1167- 415866 issued by your company for roadway and sewer improvements in the above mentioned subdivision, in the current amount of $74,000.00 may be reduced to the amount of $11,000.00. If you have any questions, feel free to call our office. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer A„,‘, J-rry ims Plat Inspector Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER TO: Tom Yake FROM: Jerry Sims SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON SUBJECT: Evergreen Point 3rd PE1469C DATE: October 10, 1989 We have received a request from the sponsor to reduce /release the bond for the above mentioned project. Please review this at your earliest possible convenience and notify me of the amount, if any, we need to retain in order to assure the completion of the project. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. mith Homes god&kee w A DIVISION OF W.R.S. & ASSOC., INC. Mr. Jerry Simms Spokane County Engineers Office' No. 811 Jefferson'Street Spokane, Washington, 99260 Dear Jerry: October 9, 1989 I would at this time like to request from your office an inspection of Evergreen Point 3rd Addition in the Spokane Valley so that a current punch list may be made if one is _.. needed. Also, when you receive the inspections, could you immed- iately send to us a letter reducing the requirements of our cash bond. Jerry, it is important that this is done right away, so that I can pay the subs the balance of the monies due them. Thanking you for your immediate attention in regard to the above and trusting that you will send me a letter that I will need for the bond reduction right away, I am, ws /wrs Sincerely yours, Bill Smith, President W.R.S. & Associates Inc 9 OCT 0 9 1989 P.O. BOX 14084 • SPOKANE, WA 99214 • (509) 01 922 -0782 Signing checked OFFICE Date /O /fin /H9 Inspector - stro:,ka Weather a.m. Time Charged Contractor this Day - 1/2 or 1 Other County Personnel am m P-1.rnch L,Sf OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1 2 3 4 5 6 p.m. Contractor Personnel Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 Diary Section Q 7'nnppravj Rn k 11�� t inST7l/ G,.nt j Sir _ Sy-7, and stra r}" �3� Sun/ r j M4i.f n..,llen>I- / 1/4 5 r /NaG. sew, I;n INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE Project Name 5vrr: Ft ?rot 4r14 Project No. CRP /RID Report No Contractor and /orSub(s) /e (tn. Zn zI A-, F .- e - rifle - Equipment List ' ;; ,,5 svio o.? Pg / of J_ Hrs. Used Standby Number 1 C line e 5 anti (./f;,.- nw"t` a.Z - ;n ',HIPS in Mnrj,,iej (-, II yn ;.vt ;ASIA. r /,j iLme N /7 I. f 1 l n( k S n man 61 LAM r7-c, 4'1, 4-n {.; 'Ara lG 1 }-n r.b eld ..) .�0v (9� 28_12 r_a.w.t / a fn,tyl,GCl i•n .� awr 4,s 21 17 4 Olta e7 4 ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ( LOCATION UNITS QTY. QTY. TO DATE INT. SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE M E M O R A N D U M TO: Jerry Sims, County Engineers ` � FROM: James Legat, County Utilities WOK SUBJ: Evergreen Point 3rd Addition DALE: October 11, 1989 ircaini C onn OFFICE OF COUNTY UTILITIES WILLIAM R. DOBRATZ UTILITIES DIRECTOR N. 811 JEFFERSON ST. 456 -3604 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 This is to authorize the reduction of the sewer construction security for Evergreen Point 3rd Addition from $12,000 to $3, 000. For security purposes only, Developer, W.R.S. and Associates, Inc., hereby assigns to Spokane County, a municipal corporation, the following: Savings Certificate Number /L in the face amount of 74,000.00 This assignment is made as security for the full and faithful performance by Developer, W.R.S. and Associates, Inc., of the construction of certain roads, monuments and drainage facilities in Evergreen Point Third Addition as specified in the typical section and roadway improvement specifications for said subdivision, dated ** , 198 and on file in the Office of the County Engineer. Any interest benefits accruing under said savings certificate shall remain the property of Developer, W.R.S. and Associates, Inc. Said savings certificate to be released to Developer, W.R.S. and Associates, Inc., or any other party only with the prior written consent and agreement of Spokane County. PROVIDED, FURTHER, the undersigned does hereby authorize U.S. Bank of Washington to pay over to Spokane County all or a sufficient portion of the moneys in the savings certificate referenced hereinabove upon written documentation being received from the Spokane County Engineer indicating that the purposes for which the savings certificate was assigned have not been fully and faithfully performed as required and a statement of that amount of money which the County Engineer deems necessary to complete such obliga- tion. Upon receipt of such written documentation, Developer, W.R.S. and Associates, Inc., hereby authorizes U.S. Bank of Washington to release to Spokane County that amount of money requested up to the maximum amount in the savings certificate. DATED this 1/ Rv day of August , 198 9 . * *and sewer improvement specifications for said subdivision dated , and on file in the office of the Spokane County Utilities Department BANK OF U.S. BANK OF WASHINGTON S TE COL and held in and by the U.S. Bank of Washington Bank of Spokane , Washington Valley Financial Center Branch 602.00,0 bit ::.. .c AUG 2 3 5989 A S S I G N M E N T Sus t a W W , 198 9 . /14) to me i and who laxecuted th within and foregoing ;v signed the same as their free and volun- poses therein mentioned. ;ea' this a 8de---da of August , 1989 . Notary Public, In and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane, Washington. OFFICE Or THE COUNTY ENe I NEEIR TO: Tom Yake ^ FROM: Jerry Sims SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Subject: Evergreen Point 3rd PE 1469C DATE: February 26,, 1990 The streets have been established for maintenance in the above mentioned project. Please review this at your earliest possible convenience and notify me of the amount of bond,if any, we need to retain in order to assure the completion of the project. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Date 3 /5/ 90 Inspector Si-ranks Weather a.m Time Charged Contractor this Day - 1 /2 or 1 Other County Personnel Signing checked 3 -) F und, L1 T p OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 4,014 4 I n am pm 1 2 3 4 5 6 Equipment List ' /5 ;n /Ire ;15/ t";'). s Project Name E,rt.Y9re.rn (irrl) Pn Project No. CRP /RID p.m. Report No Contractor and /orSub(s) 3 6ha,. L ) X.IAbiJ 4:,04,J Hrs. Used Standby Contractor Personnel Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 Diary Section 6•) Clean p-7,140ss j'.—J FI454 ` je •.an ; e Number H• ) Gr T be k.4,4.1* Ol11 11 N19.1 1";"3S Sew eY "lain half s. S_) (9 T. 74$1.41 clr. 5 J r -ks fr J _ 1 6.) r om p le.-t t Alt ‘" ?OR "nr.n - 7- ) Pe'a&L n k1M nrn.. , alit ynla4 AF. 2.4 e RaJ:✓ar of I ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION LOCATION UNITS QTY. QTY. TO DATE INT. INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE f��. 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 For Ronh METHOD N H, P1. f BLOWS PER LAYER 25 41 115,6 175,6 1 13,4 125.3 Iz5. III,z. NO. LAYERS 4 TAMPER WT. 37515 DROP WE MOLD DIA. �Nr WGT. OF WET SOIL V 2z, L 1 WET UNIT WEIGHTIh /t}; VOLUME OF SAMPLE MOISTURE SAMPLE N0. 45 3, 6 s' /Ib COMPACTION TEST DATA z WGT OF WET SOIL S'MOLD sr 17 1175, WGT. OF MOLD 5r JO 4 x" 194-75$ WGT. OF WET SOIL- 6.345H4 WGT. OF DRY SOIL*01&H WGT. OFWATER TS 10,3 12.2 141 W8'F0F -OfSH WGT. OF DRY SOIL 111,9 113,4 11. MOISTURE CONTENT 9z 10,8 12.7 DRY UNIT WEIGHT /b /(p 11T9 113 111. MECHANICAL ANALYSIS RE #4 N. PASSING #4 SOIL CLASS FICATION: S id u h .tee- self a- s ave P , MOISTUR CONTENT MA DENS SAMPLE GRAVEL SAND \ ITY DATE 9.1, 120.J O-,9 h9 T�§TEA BY HECKCD BY- ATE JO NO. A. I - GP - 190 LOCATION Galerlr Pi: 3r /add• REMA KS: 5 =2,67 control x.reK.q 3/4 IQO$ f-Cr IVz 3.0 16,4 f 4 175,4 049• �3 125.6 614 • t 125,3 FINES 196 CONTRACT: j - E - 7 p -� 5 10 15 20 25 30 MOISTURE CONTENT — 4 OF DRY WEIGHT 35 40 STA: FIp r sreC?n Pt 3 rd 9k 45 50 Project: GUerSreth pf 3ra Md. Material: 5pksrade A. WGT OF DRY MAT 512, 3 B. WGT OF PYE + H 0 /472.7 2 A +B= 1955. o s•1 WGT /CU FT. = BULK SP GR X 62.2= C. WGT OF PYE + H 0 + MAT 1793,3 A +B -C 2 RICE Si GR = A = 2,67 W.S.T.D. TEST METHOD 705A (68 ° ) 117 Date: II-07-67 Contract: E. - GP -190 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CORES DETERMINATION OF % AIR VOIDS W.S.T.D. TEST METHOD NO. 706A (METHOD C) LAB NO. CORE NO. LAB NO. CORE NO. C. WGT IN WATER C. WGT IN WATER B. WGT SAT. SURF. DRY B. WGT SAT. SURF. DRY A. WGT OF OVEN DRY SAMPLE A. WGT OF OVEN DRY SAMPLE A = A= CALC BULK SP GR = B -C CALC BULK SP GR = B -C WGT /CU FT. = BULK SP GR X 62.2= A. WGT OF DRY MAT B. WGT OF PYE + H 0 2 A+B= C. WGT OF PYE + H 0 + MAT 2 A +B -C RICE SP GR = A = A +B -C A +B -C RICE SP GR X AMAX WGT%CU FT/491 I RICE SP GR X 62.2 =MAX WGT /CU FT % AIR VOIDS= 100X1 -BULK SP GR= % AIR VOIDS =100X1 -BULK SP GR= RICE SP GR RICE SP GR Test No. Station and Ref. to C/L Ref. to Sub Grade type of Material and Use MOiSIURE PERCENT PERCENT PASSING 114 SIEVE DRY DENSITY PCF REMARKS Opt. Opt. Correctec Fielc Test Max. Corr. Sp 4;r SEd.- -14". Field Test % Max. 1 0...1/.4 1*2-! '0 0.6.8ndk, , 11 10.8 9,0 5. 79% 113. 121.1 2.67 119.0 98.3 >95,0 ol': L Owl in cry . -O 9 =0 6.6 Lei) r", IL( -I 111.7 97.L 3 5.4, +y Bk La, 1 +7s - .3 9.0 6 A 1Z1.1 11 A.S 97.9 4 )..,.n 3k 1.h rrs - 6 / "' 9.0 7.L j LI.1 111.9 274 S nrzS 6kl, o 9 8 IL1.1 �/ 119.1 98 -i DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT Project Engineer Contractor L y j, L n . 1 , Project Name Eyeiyrtevt p4 . REMARKS: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS Cont. No. E -GP- 190 Date 11/1619.9 Page No. 1 of INSPECTOR Test No. Station and Ref. to C/L . to Sub Grade Type of Material and Use 7 -, .a4«a •s74a PASSING #4 SIEVE ir , • ,« REMARKS Opt. Opt. Correct& Fie lc Test Max. Corr *6 c" M,, Field Test % Max. + Z6 tc, .4.a. `1 +SS - 71E , a6t, ,l,,kfilI 1o.$ 8..9 6.1 797 113 -1 Iz1•I L -47 1I8.9 98.Z >9St olc Z S t - 7 5 8 - 9 74 Anry )2.x.1 114.9 96 - 5 3 yifo .ff& 9.3 1b2_ 8370 119.6 IIR.n 98.7 H Zed' A—I_ G, r oo 9.3 9. Z 9.'1 7 -4 ✓5 4" lin j 17 -L lu) -o 117.A )t7 7 98.5 9R -1 s u 4-4- H +7 1 6 b + zs QNNev, i75 LAc� "- o -15- 9,L $.9 R..3 �rj �Z"�' 1La.o ? ?1.W 11$_1 117. L 9s -5 96.s 7 8 n ut -rf A -Y 78Z. ✓ Ili-Li v ► 1ti.s 96 0 V DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT Project Engineer Contractor 1-43Lbnot3 A Project Name &.urc ICIoN REMARKS: • l SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS Cont. No. F - d P - l�n Date ///10/89 Page No. 1- of IISPECIDR /.Z Test No. Station and Ref. to C/L Ref. to Sub Grade Type of Material and Use M)ISITJRE PERCENT Field Test PERCENT PASSING I/4 SIEVE DRY DENSITY PCF REMARKS Opt. Opt. Correctec Max. Corr. Field Test % Max. 9. Id,. I 15 4 1.6"` — 3 -3 0.6- BacAfit( 10.8 8.9 Y,9 9,2 9.0 /8Z J.. Isar 113.4 1L1_41 12.1 -'l L.67 /16• L 1v' -$ 95,7 P.5"..4 )95 7 Ok L if'p '- 1 zit'- 3 ! *75n..,1 Lai - 9 8.9 8.3 i2.1 117 -L 96_5 `I or zs o,..L�+ - 9 8.9 8.9 )0.2. 9,5- V 'i 1 LL.'{ IL1. 116 -i3 llS.5 96.E 97.6 5 b +7s5,.,,,, -9 `� 2. DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT Project Engineer Contractor L . 1 k 1T / Project Name E.,l a y .n,., P4 3, J ,4./ 1 REMARKS: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS Cont. No. Date )� /'L /a9 Page No. / E- P. /90 of ) INSPECTOR �, Test No. 1 Wt. % Rot. % Pass Specs. or Rot. (% pass) { 0 0 IW IOo 65 7 3 .64 5 5 -76 673 47 53 45 Ass 8' I 19 8 -24 1675 90,9 91 0 -10.0 Moisture % Frec. face LL PL PI Selve Sizes No. 20C, Pen Wash Wt. Ret. % Rot. % Pass Specs. or (1 pass) $ Size or type Sampled and test by Source Weights- Wash Size or typo Sampled and test by Source Weights- Wash Moisture % Frec. face >< LL PL PI Solve Sizes No 20C, Pan Wash Wt. $ Ret. Ret. $ Pass Specs. or (f pass) % Sand Eg r9 2 3 Sum of $'s Used Size or type csI C Sampled and test by 5 r Source r krgreen 3r fl f a Welghts -1 f Wash I7)Ijr dsture $ Frec. face... `.a2% PL P1 Solve Sizes 5/5 it No. 200 Pen Wash SA -1 SIEVE ANALYSIS WORKSHEET FOR TYPE 2A AGGREGATE BASE Test No. Test No. Contract No. �(Z,I1 Material ('Sjt Date 9/z9/89 ulvelent Carps 11E South 25 Aitamont 509 535-1410 Inland Pacific Engineering Spokane, Washington 99202 PROJECT: 6YERGC'EEn/ ATTENTION: Gentlemen: Description Requested Ac tign Sincerely, INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. Ira! Ismittal TO: nY 5'H$ DATE: 4ee6zsr 7/ /45 ao S wE GGQ4'Py Eif/G/4' rza : .. v r r' e G 4 , 14 3 ''a /412P/7701 /412P/7701 1 ;WO 1 1 1989 t S COUNTY ENV We are sending ( enclosed ( ) under separate cover copies of the following: Pt Blueline Prints / / Copy of Letter / % / / Original Drawing / / Contract Documents / / / % Work Authorization / % Report / / No. Copies Date Description A7- / / %S /Information / Review & Comments / / Distribution /Written Approval / / Signature & Return / / Remarks wt y,4rt ,,.40E ,P7S /o,Vf /S/ /G4L/T2l4 //t/ ,Y52t pZE,ASt ietr /Sr/ n:. Test No. Station and Ref. to C/ L Ref. to Sub Grade Type of Material and Use MOISTURE PERCENT Percent Passing #4 Sieve DRY DENSITY PCF REMARKS Curve Opt. Corrected Opt. Field Reading Curve Max. Calculated, Max. S p. Gr. Field Density Reading % Comp. I lt z.4 ti '.4w _ 3 O.G. BacW 1i /1.0 9S 84 73- 118.4 124.0 Z,6`t /25 -3 99 >957. at< Z 2, et e' CO SO Al.( A/. A� 9. S 9, 4 vis ray 12_4.0 ) 1 ZS• 7 100 3 Z.+SO 2..4t 9.5 A,9 /Z6,0 /LI.9 99 I ! iron 2.4dr4,.. 9.5 9.2_ 126.0 1 U•0 /00 5 j8r5a fi /ri,.,,- ' v v 9.5 9,8 y I U. ✓ 125. Y /00 DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT Project Engineer R ma sU� Contractor 1 Project Name a...an j 3 rd ..Q-CJ SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS Cont No E-GP -04'S Date 8/!//89 Page No 1 of 1 REMARKS: INSPECTOR ,Ie SC-1 CONTRACTOR thn car Test No. Station and Ref. toC /L Ref. to Sub Grade Type of Material and Use MOISTURE PERCENT Percent Passing #4 Sieve DRY DENSITY PCF REMARKS Curve Opt. Corrected Opt. Field Reading Curve Max. Calculated, Max. S Gr. p Field ensit9 R D eadin %Comp. 1 3 +80 z.6 A,.L. -6 O.6- Bak-f; 12 - 9,5 9,5 6.'i 3. 3 757, v - s »p 118.6 116.0 I zd -O y -69 1 UM /zz.o 97. I 56 $ 7952 Or< ztz5 2_6 t1.4-_,_ r /no Zd 1 L 9•S 9, 3 1 Lb.o 1z r - I 98.S 4 _ro'n../? o „ate' _ ' 1' 9.S 6 ,K 1z6.o 9 ,().0 5 1 *30 a A ” p 3.5 7 6. 3 1u.0 " ' 1 40 N. C. 4 DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT Project Engineer L Masnn Contractor r Project Name 'i-dAcjreen SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS Cont. No. E- GP -oq5 POK ?, UNITY _' Date 6//5/89 Page No ( of / REMARKS: INSPECTOR 'ird„AS SC -1 CONTRACTOR ( \ (t /'f {n10.4) Test No. Station and Ref. to CIL . Ref. to Sub Grade Type of Material and Use MOISTURE PERCENT Percent Passing #4 Sieve DRY DENSITY PCF REMARKS Curve Opt. Corrected Opt. Field Reading Curve Max. Calculated Max. S Sp. Gr. Field Density Reading / Comp. % / its as ,4,--.- o U.6_ 1R,r1r1;11 1Z.0 9.L 7,4 7ZZ 118.6 /16.9 2--6' izo.B 95-L »n Ok Z1:rar so 4 ?4 ,, a 0 9. 2. b.B Vo Aso i 7_C,9 123.6 97.4 3 t :. — Y - ,Z 6,L . ,l `1 arzo u R,.e • `1 9. Z 7.9 / 2-6.9 1 1.5.1 98 2 S 3 #7,C Z6',4 - 3 `-' , 3.. 6,2_ ✓ 1 z6.9 4 / i z1 0 93.'1 v DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT Project Engineer R. l . Mn<n■ Contractor h.7 Project Name t=,n.rn.f, reen 3,7,1 ,4d,J. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS Cont No E P> �/S" Date Khasi 9 Page No / INSPECTOR SC -1 CONTRACTOR of / REMARKS: Transamerica Title Insurance Services Lir Prepared for: Inland Pacific Engineering Co. S. 25 Altamont Attn: Eric (continued) Transamerica Title Insurance Company - North 720 Argonne Road Spokane, Washington 99212 (509) 922-2222 PLAT CERTIFICATE Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. Charge: $125.00 Tax: $9.75 Total: $134.75 1983 1'1 S;°-i ' / x/116 (. (: JVllj • Order No. MO- 14520 " r t _`.,� ' ,.. Certificate for Filing Plat of EVERGREEN POINT 3RD ADDN In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for approval, this Company has examined the records of the Spokane County Aud- itor's and Clerk's offices, and the office of the Clerk of the United States District Court holding terms in said County. This certificate is made for the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount, if any, paid for this certificate. From such examination the Company hereby certifies the title to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to wit: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Those portions of Tracts 210 and 225 of VERA, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 30, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 6, EVERGREEN POINT FIRST ADDITION,, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 18 of Plats, page 75; thence Westerly along the Northerly boun- dary of said Addition the following three (3) courses: (1) North 89 ° 17'00" West a distance of 125.00 feet; (2) South 86 20'55" West a distance of 50.15 feet; (3) North 89 ° 17'00" West a distance of 129.00 feet; thence North 00 ° 43'00" East along a line parallel with the West line of said section a distance of 150.00 feet; thence North 89 ° 09'08" West along a line para- llel with the South line of said Tract 225 a distance of 160.00 feet to the West line of said Tract 225; thence North 00 °43'00 East along said West line a distance of 270.05 feet; thence South 89 ° 17'00" East a distance of 329.00 feet; thence North 00 °43'00" East a distance of 30.00 feet; thence South 89 ° 17' 00" east a distance of 85.00 feet; thence South 00 ° 43'00" West a distance of 175.00 feet; thence South 89 ° 17'00" East a dis- tance of 50.00 feet; thence South 00 ° 43'00" West-a distance of 271.59 feet to the point of beginning; VESTED IN: ROY H. NYHOLM and MARIE E. NYHOLM, husband and wife, as to an undivided 1/3 interest; WESLEY B. ANDERSON and ALICE M. ANDERSON, husband and wife, as to an undivided 1/3 interest; and HAROLD G. ANDERSON, JR., individually, as to an undivided 1/3 interest. EXCEPTIONS: 1. General taxes as follows, together with interest and penalty, if any, after delinquency: Current Tax Acct 11 26543 -0102 Affects portion of 26543 -0831 Affects portion of NOTE: Future Tax Account No(s): 45263.0102 45263.0831 NOTE: 1989 assessed valuation: Land $58,400.00 " $35,060.00 2. Any assessments that might be levied by Vera Irrigation District No. 15 3. AGREEMENT AND THE Between: And: Regarding: Dated:• Recorded: Recording No.: Records examined as to March 27, 1989 at 8:00 A.M. By: pds cc: Spokane County Engineers Spokane County Planning Order No. MO- 145205M Page 2 PLAT CERTIFICATE Year Annual Billing Amount Paid Balance Due 1989 $1036.61 $0.00 $1036.61 this, and other property 1989 $622.72 $0.00 $622.72 this, and other property TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Vera Electric Water Company, a corporation D.K. McDonald, A.C. Jamison, Andrew Good and Vera Land Company, a corporation Providing for construction of ditches, flumes, pipelines, etc., with right of ingress and egress to maintain said flumes, pipes, etc.; and providing for lien for unpaid charges for such service. April 25, 1908 April 25, 1908, Book "H" of Contracts, page 292 200528 TRANSAMERICA .IT INSU$ANCE COM'•NY Mi ael J. O'Hare Ti le Officer rye 7" It Lat. • e • rm. 1 1 1 2/0 422 - ri') 1- 226 ;79 El • ••• o; 4.4 7. Po The Company has not surveyed the premises sketched. The sketch below is furnished without charCe solely tor the purpose of assisting in incatinc said premises and the Company Marini nO linbilltiv tor inaccuracies tnerein. it ales not swoon to show 411. nommen,. riled] ann Easements ad:Caning or affecting said premise& TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY I • SPOKANE, WASHI i GTON ,.. This print is made sorely for the bum •se •i assrI no in locating said premises and the cimpany ass. liability for varialions, 1 any. in rIimnsk.n and location ascertained by actual Sorvey. Sarl=aleir S'4 7.? El 22? A; vv k H SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE IS t (0 MEMORANDUM {as_ .. TQ Spokane County County Engineer Spokane County Utilities Spokane County Health District Spokane County Department of Building & Safety Fire Protection District #1 Water Purveyor: Vera Water and Power ;13 COICIA7117hr PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 FROM: Thomas G. Mosher, AICP, Senior Planner DATE: June 1, 1989 Pe ►4 y C- SUBJECT: Review of Final Plat PE -1469 EVERGREEN POINT 3RD ADDITION. Enclosed find copies of the above referenced final plat. Please review and forward any comments by June 14, 1989. Thank You. 1P Enclosure c: Applicant JUN 0 1 1989 r SPOKANE COUNTY ENGU EER FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO PE1469C Plat Boundary 6/19/89 AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 1000.00000 1500.00000 1 1 INV N 89 17 00.0 W 125.0000 1001.56348 1375.00978 2 INV S 86 20 55.0 W 50.1500 998.36965 1324.96158 3 3 INV N 89 17 00.0 W 129.0000 999.98316 1195.97167 4 4 INV N 0 43 00.0 E 150.0000 1149.97143 1197.84785 5 5 INV N 89 09 08.0 W 160. 0000 1 152. 33879 1037. 86537 6 6 INV N 0 43 00.0 E 270:0500 1422.36766 1041.24312 7 7 INV S 89 17 00.0 E 329.0000 1418.25257 1370.21738 8 8 INV N 0 43 00.0 E 30. 0000 1448. 25023 1370. 59262 9 5 INV S 89 17 00.0 E 85.0000 1447.18706 1455.58597 10 10 INV S 0 43 00.0 W 175.0000 1272.20075 1453.39709 11 11 INV S 85 17 00.0 E 50.0000 1271.57535 1503.39318 12 12 INV S 0 43 00.0 W 271. 5900 1000.00660 1499.99617 13 LAT & DEF' - 0.00660 0.00383 13 HCLOSE S 30 08 32.7 E 0.0076 1000.00000 1500.00000 1 FREC = 1 TO 239142 Area = 165770.93 sq ft 3.80558 ac FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO Block 9 Sideline PE1469C 6/1 AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 998.36965 1324.96158 3 ., INV N 89 17 00.0 .W 129.0000 .999.98316 1195.97167 4 4 INV N 0 43 00.0 E 150.0000 1149.97143 1197.84785 5 5 INV N 89 09 08.0 W 146. 0000 1 152. 13164 1051.86384 14 14 INV N 0 43 00.0 E 95.0800 1247.20420 1053.05308 15 RADIAL N 89 17 00.0 W DELTA 90 00 00.0 RT RADIUS 30.0000 TAN 30.0000 L -ARC 47.1239 RADIAL N 0 43 00.0 E RP 1246.82897 1083.05074 • 16 15 CHORD N 45 43 00.0 E 42.4264 1276. 82662 1083. }'2597 17 TAN @PT S 89 17 00.0 E 17 INV S 89 17 00.0 E 225. 0000 1274. 01235 1 3 308. 40837 18 RADIAL N 0 43 00.0 E DELTA 90 00 00.0 RT RADIUS 20.0000 TAN 20.0000 L -ARC 31.4159 RADIAL S 89 17 00.0 E RP 1254.01392 1308.15821 19 18 CHORD 8 44 17 00.0 E 28.2843 1:253.76376 1328.15665 20 TAN@PT S 0 43 00.0 W 20 INV S 0 43 00.0 W 255.4100 998.37374 1324.96202 21 LAT & DEF' - 0.00409 -0.00043 21 HCLOSE S 6 03 00.9 W 0.0041 998.36965 1321.96158 3 F'REC = 1 TO 262390 Area = 53535.56 sq ft 1.22901 ac FROM ANGLE DIST Block 10 sideline PE1469C 6/19/89 AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 1 INV N 89 17 00.0 W 2 INV N 0 43 00.0 E RADIAL N 89 17 00.0 W DELTA 90 00 00.0 RT RADIUS 20.0000 TAN 20.0000 L- ARC 3 31.4159 RADIAL N 0 43 00.0 E RP 22 CHORD N 45 43 00.0 E TAN@PT S 89 17 00.0 E 24 INV S 89 17 00.0- E J INV S 0 43 00.0 W NO CLOSURE ERROR Area = 33862.91 sq ft FROM ANGLE DIST Block 11 Sideline AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START ' 27 INV S 28 INV 5 RADIAL S • DELTA RADIUS TAN L -ARC RADIAL S RP 29 CHORD s TAN @PT N 31 INV N RADIAL S DELTA RADIUS TAN L -ARC RADIAL N RP CHORD N TAN@PT N 34 INV N 32 89 17 00.0 E O 43 00.0 W 89 17 00.0 E 90 00 00. 0 RT 20.0000 1000 20. 0000 31.4159 O 43 00.0 W 45 43 00.0 W 89 17 00.0 W 89 17 00.0 W O 43 00.0 W 90 00 00.0 RT 30. 0000 30.0000 00 47.1239 89 17 00.0 W 44 17 00.0 W O 43 00.0 E O 43 00.0 F NO CLOSURE ERROR Area = 12546.02 sq ft 125. 0000 251.5900 28.2843 105.0000 271. 5900 135. 0000 75.0000 :28. 2843 85.00) 42.4264 65. 0000 NORTH 1000. 00000 1001 . 5634 125 13 1252.88365 1398. 15507 1272.88208 1398.40523 1271.56875 1000. 00000 1000. 00000 0.77739 ac NORTH 1422.19255 1420.50399 1345.50986 1345.76001 1325.76158 1326.82475 1356.82240 1357. 19764 1422.19255 EAST TO 1500.00000 13'75. 00 1378.15663 1503. 355701 1500.00000 1500.00000 EAST 1 055. 24202 1190.23146 1189.29 337 1169.29494 1169.04478 1084.05143 1084.42666 1054. 42901 1 22 2 24 25 26 1 TO 27 28 29 30 31 3L J3 34 1055. x'4202. 35 1422.19255 1055. 24202 27 0.28802 ac FROM ANGLE DIST -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-__ ----------_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-__ 39 40 Block 12 Sideline PE1469C 6/19/89 AUTO INVERSE ***** START 8 INV N 0 A3 00.0 E 30.0000 9 INV • S 89 17 00.0 E 85^0000 10 INV S 0 43 00"0 W 125^0000 36 INV N 89 17 00.0 W 195"0000 RADIAL S 0 43 00.0 W DELTA 90 00 00.0 RT RADIUS 20.0000 TAN 2()"0000 L-ARC 31.4159 RADIAL N 89 17 00"0 W RP 37 CHORD N 44 17 00.0 W 28^2843 TAN@PT N 0 43 00°0 E INV N 0 43 00.0 E 75"0000 INV S 89 17 00.0 E 130.0000 ------------ �� NO CLOSURE ERROR Area = 22889.16 sq ft FROM ANGLE DIST ------- centerline 26th Ave PE1469C 6/19/89 AUTO INVERSE ***** START 6 INV N 89 09 08.0 W 42 INV N 0 43 00.0 E 43 INV S 89 17 00.0 E 44 INV S 89 17 00.0 E 45' INV S 89 17 00.0 E 46 INV S 0 43 00.0 W LAT & DEP 47 HCLOSE N 0 00 28.9 E 0.0042 PREC = 1 TO 148561 No Area FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH centerline stub street AUTO INVERSE ***** START 44 INV N 0 43 00.0 E 48 INV N 89 17 00.0 W LAT & DEP 49 HCLOSE N 0 00 28.9 E 0.0042 PREC = 1 TO 34247 No Area FROM ANG|E DIST Centerline Bolivar Road AUTO INVERSE ***** START 45 INV 50 INV S 0 43 00.0 W N 86 20 55.0 E 298^500u 25"0750 LAT & DEP 51 HCLOSE S 38 06 03.1 E 0.0027 PREC = 1 TO 119654 No Area NORTH 1418.25257 1448^25023 1447.18706 1322.19684 1324^63587 1344"63430 1344.88446 1419.87860 1418.25257 1418.25257 0.52546 ac NORTH -_-_-_-_-____-^-_-_-`-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-__ 1152^33879 1037,86537 6 20.0000 1152.63471 1017.86756 42 150.0000 1302.62297 1019^74374 43 194.0000 1300^19645 1213.72856 44 140.0000 1298.44534 1353.71761 45 100.0000 1297^19456 1453.70979 46 25.0000 1272.19651 1453.39709 47 ~~-- -~_- 0"00423 0"00000 1272.20075 1453.39709 11 1300.19645 1213.72856 44 120.0000 1420.18706 1215.22951 48 25.0000 1420"49975 1190.23146 49 ._ ____ 0.00423 0^00000 1420.50399 1190.23146 28 NORTH EAST . TO 1370.21738 1370.59262 1455"58597 1454^02248 1259.03774 1259.28790 1239.28946 1.240. '22755 1370^2173B 1370.21738 EAST EAST EAST 1298.44534 1353.71761 999^96869 1349"98401 1001.56561 1375.00811 = ____________________ ~0.00213 0.00167 1001,56348 1375.00978 8 9 10 36 37 38 , 39 40 41 8 TO TO TO 45 50 51 2 Transamerr r Title Insurance Services Prepared for: Inland Pacific Engineering Co. S. 25 Altamont Attn: Eric Transamerica Title Insurance Col., .ay North 720 Argonne Road RE H3 (509) 922-2222 Washington 99212 JUN 1 1989 Doty Engineering PLAT CERTIFICATE In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for approval, this Company has examined the records of the Spokane County Aud- itor's and Clerk's offices, and the office of the Clerk of the United States District Court holding terms in said County. This certificate is made for the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount, if any, paid for this certificate. From such examination the Company hereby certifies the title to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to wit: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Those portions of Tracts 210 and 225 of VERA, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 30, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 6, EVERGREEN POINT FIRST ADDITION, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 18 of Plats, page 75; thence Westerly along the Northerly boun- dary of said Addition the following three (3) courses: (1) North 89 ° 17'00" West a distance of 125.00 feet; (2) South 86 20'55" West a distance of 50.15 feet; (3) North 89 ° 17'00" West a distance of 129.00 feet; thence North 00 ° 43'00" East along a line parallel with the West line of said section a distance of 150.00 feet; thence North 89 ° 09'08" West along a line para- llel with the South line of said Tract 225 a distance of 160.00 feet to the West line of said Tract 225; thence North 00 °43'00" East along said West line a distance of 270.05 feet; thence South 89 ° 17'00" East a distance of 329.00 feet; thence North 00 ° 43'00" East a' distance of 30.00 feet; thence South 89 ° 17' 00" east a distance of 85.00 feet; thence South 00 °43''00" West a distance of 175.00 feet; thence South 89 ° 17'00" East a dis- tance of 50.00 feet; thence South 00 ° 43'00" West a distance of 271.59 feet to the point of beginning; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. VESTED IN: ROY H. NYHOLM and MARIE E. NYHOLM, husband and wife, as to an undivided 1/3 interest; WESLEY B. ANDERSON and ALICE M. ANDERSON,,husband and wife, as to an undivided 1/3 interest; and HAROLD G. ANDERSON, JR:, individually, as to an undivided 1/3 interest. (continued) Charge: $125.00 Tax: $9.75 Total: $134.75 RECEIVE D MAR 311 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPA1 Order No. MO- 145205M P -14E, 7- Certifite Fir or Plat o EVERGREEN POINT 3RD ADDN EXCEPTIONS: 1. General taxes as follows, together with interest and penalty, if any, after delinquency: Current Tax Acct 1 Year Annual Billing Amount Paid Balance Due 26543 -0102 1989 $1036.61 $0.00 $1036.61 Affects portion of this, and other property 26543 -0831 1989 $622.72 $0.00 $622.72 Affects portion of this, and other property 2 Any assessments that might be levied by Vera Irrigation District No. 15 3. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Between: . Vera Electric Water Company, a corporation And: D.K. McDonald, A.C. Jamison, Andrew Good and Vera Land Company, a corporation Regarding: Providing for construction of ditches, flumes, pipelines, etc., with right of ingress and egress to maintain said flumes, pipes, etc.; and providing for lien for unpaid charges for such service. Dated: April 25, 1908 Recorded: April 25, 1908, Book "H" of Contracts, page 292 Recording No.: 200528 Records examined as to March 27, 1989 at 8:00 A.M. pds NOTE: Future Tax Account No(s): 45263.0102 45263.0831 NOTE: 1989 assessed valuation: Land $58,400.00 " $35,060.00 Order No. MO- 145205M Page 2 PLAT CERTIFICATE By: cc: Spokane County Engineers Spokane County Planning TRANSAMERICA IT INSUEANCE COMp.ANY Mi ae1 J. O'Hare Ti le Officer we f r Ys b 1 • i • 1 NM IS i9 '• 4 MMUS B 22 II 1 • 2 6 .4 L9 a: w 2/0 the Comnany has nat surveyed the mantises sketched. The sketch below is furnished without charge solely tar the purpose of assisting in Incat :nc said premises and the Camceny assumes no Iwbillity to inaccuracies therein. a Cses not purport to Show ALL kiunwers. (rods amr c3srTent, edlolnlne Or plectine hid Drinusat. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY This print is made solely 1.r the prep se -r assisting in I,catinq sold plcrnses end the mforany as•: rnes n hithdi!y Im vari:.:mts, 1 anv In nne..osi-fl : !1::3tinn a- r'ora.nsl I�; a..h: •.n•.y 2 // J 9' 224 LJ SPOKANE, WASHINGTON N 22• • w Q t k 1 May 26, 1989 Mr. Jerry Sims Spokane County Engineer's Office North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 RE: EVERGREEN POINT THIRD AUDITION Dear Jerry: Enclosed please find two copies of the draft final plat referenced above. Please review for final approval. The enclosed check for $310 is the plat check fee ($200 plus 11 lots @ $10 per lot). You should already have received a plat certificate from Transamerica. Please call if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. E4 Eric W. Calkins EWC:jes enc. INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. South 25 Altamont Street Spokane, Washington 99202 (509) 535 -1410 MAY 2 6 1989 SPUME COI)NTY ENGINEER Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Environmental Analysis TO THE ORDER OF SA Smith 171 Homes "A Trademark -of Quality" A DIVISION OF W.R.S. &ASSOC., INC. -- P.O. BOX 14084 • SPOKANE, WA 99214 19- 10/1250 116 - CON. LIC. NO. WRSAS.245MG . Valley Financial Center f _ TELEPHONE: 922 -0782 U.S. B ANK OF WASHINGTON' 515 1 3 Spokane, WA 99206 - DATE CHECK NO. AMOUNT 11 t :1 2E0001051: L L67 37889011' i, RECEIPT Date ---5 19 g1 Received From 5\' t'\ \\O e 5 Address 1 p ! Q _ Dollars $ 3 a. For c N AL � � AT ( 1- ACU Yee, o'inT 3 d t ACCOUNT NT HOW PAID AMT. OF ACCOUNT AMT. PAID BALANCE DUE .. ,.. CASH 67t/3 ... CHECK I i , ..��1 ��- �_ ..- ORDER By 8K808 riEciFortm 00 Hemmings Bill From: To: Subject: Date: As we have been discussing the need for an additional position, I present the following information as justification for an additional Engineering 2 position: 1. The passage last night of the new Hearing Examiner position will require a substantial expenditure of additional time and resources to do the proper preparation for the one hearing which will be the one shot where we will have at presenting our conditions and recommendations for approval or denial of the land use action. This will be the official record for this land use action. I estimate that this additional time could amount to 1/4 of 1 FTE. 2. The additional duties we have been discussing regarding following each construction project through to final acceptance as the county project manager will require a substantial amount of additional time be spent that we can bill for through our current fee agreement. I would estamate this work taking from 1/2 to 3/4 of 1 FTE. 3. The new KB 1724 legislation will also increase the amount of time that we anticipate we will have to spend with the public, developers, other agencies, and other departments within Public Works. It is difficult at this point in time to estimate how much additional time might bespent, but it could easily amount to 1/4 of 1 FTE. 4. Ed Parry, Dean Franz and myself are spending and have spent what should be our break times during the day working and often work thru our lunch while we are eating. This has been going on for the last three years. In addition Ed and Dean have been willing to work a substantial number of additional hours of overtime. (See tabulation below) I am also having to work additional overtime at the same rate as Ed and Dean. We have been unable to be able to take vacation time or attend additional training seminars as often as we should because of work load and committments that Spokane County makes to the development community. This is beginning to "burn out" these good and dedicated employees and I feel it is unfair to continue to depend on this type of effort from our staff. Our employees have families and it it vital that these relationships not be abused. Between Ed, Dean and Myself I estimate we have donated approximately 750 hours to the county each of the last two years with no letup in site. This amounts to 0.36 of 1 FTE or 0.72 of an FTE or approximately $50,400 of savings to Spokane County over the last two years. We have averaged 436 hours of overtime in the last two years with Dean and Ed working the majority of this time as our two primary plat review engineers. The total number of hours donated thru breaks and overtime averages 1,186 hours per year for 1994 and 1995. This equates to 0.57 of 1 FTE. I believe the above information more that justifies the addition of a new Engineer 2 position. There is a team for the Engineer 2 position so this is not an obstacle. The breakdown of the overtime and breaks worked is shown below. There is no time shown for lunch time worked as we have not recorded this time. Bill Hemmings 9.25 Dean Franz 322.50 Ed Parry 168.00 Paul Lenneman 4.00 Katherine Miller 8.00 Doug Busko 0.00 Overtime Breaks Worked T otals ENG Hemmings Bill UTL Rawls Bruce UTL Request For Additional Engineering 2 Position Wednesday, February 14, 1996 5:43PM 511.75 750.00 1,261.75 50.0 181.5 114.5 0.0 11.0 4.0 361.0 750.0 1,111.0 1,245 / 2,080 Hours = 0.58% of 1 FTE 1994 1995 Jan. 1996 1996 Projected Page 1 9.5 20.0 11.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.25 60.00 101.25 114.0 240.0 141.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 495.0 750.0 1,245.0 OLD BOILER PLATE CONDITION LANGUAGE: Drainage plans and design calculations showing a al' en t of drainage facilities shall be submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance prior to constructi d/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional C En eer. NEWEST VERSION REVISED BY BILL HEMMINGS Final drainage plans and drainage report, including all required information as specified in county codes, rules and regulations, shall be submitted to the County Engineer at the time final application is made and acceptance by the County Engineer shall be acquired prior to construction and /or the filing of the final land use action or permit. The drainage design and submittal shall conform to all design standards and laws that regulate stormwater runoff in Spokane County and shall be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. OLD BOILER PLATE CONDITION LANGUAGE: Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities shall be submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. NEWEST VERSION REVISED BY BILL HEMMINGS Final drainage plans and drainage report, in rules and regulations, shall be submitted to t shall be accepted by the County Engineer p or permit. The drainage design /Mg rtt I stormwater runoff in Spokane County h (I Civil Engineer. ding all quired information as specified in county codes, ou Engineer at the time final application is made and o construction and /or the filing of the final land use action all conform to all design standards and laws that regulate be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional OLD BOILER PLATE CONDITION LANGUAGE: Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment drainage facilities shall be submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance prior to construction and/or a filing of the final plat. Drainage plans prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engine NEW LANGUAGE TO REPLACE THE ABOVE LANGU GE: Final, complete drainage plans, drainage report and all the submitted design meets all applicable standards, law to the County Engineer, by the licensed Professiona prior to construction and /or filing of the fina requirements of Spokane County and shall such as Chapter 3.20; 9.14 and 9.33. o of documentation required to demonstrate that and good engineering practice shall be submitted vil Engineer in responsible charge, for acceptance lat. The drainage plans shall meet the most current o meet the applicable portions of the Spokane County Code NEWEST VERSION REVISED BY BILL HEMMINGS Final sealed and certified drainage plans, drainage report an other necessary information, shall be submitted to the County Engineer prior to construction and/ the filing of the final land use action or permit. The drainage design, and supporting documentatio shall conform to all design standards and laws that regulate stormwater runoff in Spokane County s also conform to what is considered the current state -of- practice ( "accepted standards "). The desi engineer shall consider the numerous sources available that help to define the state -of- practice. The rrent edition of the "Design and Construction of Urban Stormwater Management Systems (Manual o ractice No. 77) ASCE/WEF is a summary of the state-of- p ractice. Date: To: From: Subject: Draft: for Review: Only; 5110/96 .............. ......................... ......... ................... ....... ............................. ............................ Policy Memorandum May 10, 1996 All Concerned Parties Sill Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Policy - Plan Review Process for Projects which received preliminary plat approval after May 15, 1996. This policy has recently been implemented to insure that adequate inspection and Record Drawings are provided in accordance with Section 9 of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, 1995 (SCRS). Unless stated otherwise, the term "Engineer" shall mean the Sponsor's Construction Engineer, licensed in the State of Washingon, and as defined in the SCRS. Policy A. Surety Prior to issuance of a construction permit, the Sponsor shall provide the County: a) A signed agreement between the Sponsor and the Construction Engineer for inspection, testing and certification of road and drainage facilities. The signed agreement shall be in a form acceptable to the County Engineer; b) A letter from the Construction Engineer declaring the fee to perform the inspection, testing and certification work; and c) Surety for inspection and testing services, as calculated by the County Engineer. B. Inspection. Testing and Certification A clarification is needed regarding what the County requires for the inspection, certification and preparation of Record Drawings plans of the construction of road and drainage facilities. Inspection, certification, and Record Drawings are required in accordance with the current Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, Section 9.0. Site construction inspections and monitoring, material testing, and reporting, need to generally follow the WSDOT Construction Manual (M41 -01). Policy Memorandum dated May 10, 1996 Spokane County Public Works page 3 Drainage The Engineer is to go over the project, particularly during severe storms, closely observing the quantity and action of the storm water runoff to determine sufficiency of the storm drainage system. The placement of curbs, grates and culverts need to be placed at the proper elevation to insure adequate drainage of storm runoff. If underground streams and seepage zones are encountered, which were not anticipated or accounted for in the design, or if any other portion of the drainage system appears to be inadequate in the opinion of the Engineer, the Engineer shall notify the County, the Sponsor and the Contractor immediately. The Engineer shall diligently coordinate with these various parties in developing mitigative measures to address the problem. For construction of pipes and drainage structures, the Engineer shall check for conformance with the plans and specifications on the condition and methods of the pipe foundation, bedding, backfill and pipe grades. Erosion Control If an erosion control plan has been required for this project, the Engineer shall record what erosion and sedimentation control measures were implemented by the Contractor, and what sequence in the construction process. Note when silt fences, sediment traps /ponds are installed, construction entrances, and how well they are maintained throughout the duration of construction. If downstream properties is impacted by silt deposition from site construction, the Engineer needs to record when it occurred and what mitigative measures were initiated to correct the problem. Material Testing • General: The Engineer must see that his inspectors are equipped with the proper tools to test and inspect materials and that arrangements are made to insure that material samples are representative, accurate and complete. It is imperative that the Engineer keep the Contractor informed of test results at all times. If the material being produced does not meet the requirements of the specifications, the Contractor must be informed immediately that is unacceptable, so that corrections can be made. The Engineer must keep a record of daily test results. The Engineer shall conduct sampling and testing as often as necessary each day of construction. Aggregates Gradation and material testing and reporting of the rock material for conformance with the Specifications is needed for each material used. The Engineer is to watch for segregation of materials during all stages of manufacture, hauling, and placement. Pavements The Engineer shall test for, as a minimum, material gradation, Maialiall t at uf them asphalt Rice Density, and asphalt content. The following test methods are approved by the County Engineer, other test methods may be permitted subject to the Sponsor acquiring approval prior to construction. Rice Density Test - WSDOT Test Method 705 Gradation test (on cold feed) - WSDOT Test Method 104 Sampling Procedure - WSDOT Test Method 712 Asphalt Content - WSDOT Test Method 722, or Test Method 710, or Test Method 711. Draft Policy Memo (5/10/96) Policy Memorandum dated May 10, 1996 Spokane County Public Works page 4 Concrete Curbs & Sidewalks The Engineer shall ascertain that the concrete work meets the requirements of the specifications, including but not limited to, testing for compressive strength, air entrainment, and slump. Submittals and Reporting to the County Inspection reports, material testing reports, and Record Drawings are to be submitted to the County upon the completion of each phase of the project. When the Engineer fords the construction work not in conformance with the plans and specifications, he shall notify the Contractor and the Sponsor immediately of non - conforming work. In the event the Contractor fails to immediately correct the defective work, it is the responsibility of the sponsor to rectify the situation. In the event the Engineer fords the need to revise the plans at the time of construction, he/she shall immediately notify the County of his/her intention, and shall coordinate their efforts with the County, the sponsor and the Contractor. Unless there is an immediate danger to life or property, the Sponsor is required to obtain written acceptance from the Sponsor's Design Engineer of plan changes prior to implementation and shall forward a copy of the approved plan changes and related calculations, to the County Engineer. The inspection reports, material testing reports, and the Engineer's Record Drawings are to be sufficiently complete so as to clearly demonstrate that every aspect of the project is in conformance with the plans and specifications. The Engineer is to submit the reports and plans to the County in an organized and complete manner, with the sponsor's Engineers /Surveyors certification statement. All reports and Record Drawings are to include an engineer's stamp and signature by the Sponsor's Construction Engineer. The Record Drawings need to reflect what was actually installed and constructed. Any changes in elevations and horizontal location of pavements, curbs and drainage structures, which are outside of normal construction tolerances, would need to be identified in the Record Drawings. William A. Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Draft Policy Memo (5/10/96) Meeting Agenda Development Engineering Services Monday, April at 8:30 am i3 1. To: Bill Hemmings Ed Parry Paul Lennemann Doug Busko From: Dean Franz Pavement Design Matrix - Report by Dean Franz - Work Group needs to be formed to review GU work and revise matrix Policy Memo's - Status Report by Bill Hemmings/Ed Parry 3 Status of Project Reviews Round -table Summary of Projects under Review Any Problems? 4 Open Discussion Bring up any topic of interest/concern Next Meeting Monday, May 27, 8:30 am? Note: Dean Franz has a meeting scheduled with Dennis Scott and Rob Binger at 7:30 am. So I may be a little late to Development Engr. Services meeting. 4 c ,n (2'e9art - Le n et Ceres - el Pagi n'{ Pg2K Acteeeer- DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering Jim Red, Spokane County Utilities Department Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department -Bill Hemmings, Stormwater Utility Greg Figg, Department of Transportation Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board Reardon School District Fire District No. 5 FROM: John Pederson, Senior Planner DATE: May 7, 1996 RE: Zone Reclassification from Exclusive Agricultual (EA) to General Agricultural (GA) APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING MAY 23, 1996 AT 1:15 DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING 1" FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Division of Building and Planning encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the attached form to Louis Webster for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Division of Building and Planning file (so bring three copies to the meeting). Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact Louis Webster of the Division of Building and Planning at 456 -2205. c: Will Payne, P. O. Box 18586, Spokane, WA 99208 Attachments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, Project Design, Site Plan A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE. WASHINCTOM 99760 :i Design Review for May 23, 1996 at 1:15 Zone Reclassification from Exclusive Agricultural (EA) to General Agricultural (GA) Generally located '/ mile east of Ritchey Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 12, Township 26 North, Range 40 EWM, Spokane County, Washington COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Agriculture and outside the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: zone reclassification from Exclusive Agricultural (EA) to General Agricultural (GA) for four single family residences and those uses allowed in the General Agricultural Zone PARCEL NUMBERS: 06124.9006 PTN. SITE SIZE• Approximately 40 acres APPLICANT: Will T. Payne P. O. Box 18586 1112 Brooks Road Spokane, WA 99208 (509) 487.3119 ASSIGNED PLANNER: Louis Webster APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING Date: Department: Department Contact Person: Louis Webster Action: Zone Reclassification from Exclusive Agricultural (EA) to General Agricultural (GA); Will Payne APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING: May 23, 1996 at 1:15 Note: The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard before the Hearing Examiner. The following information does not provide a complete or binding final review of the proposal. This will occur only after the proposal is accepted and placed on the Public Hearing Agenda. The acceptance of the application and scheduling of the application on the Public Hearing Agenda is the primary function of this meeting. A secondary function of this meeting is to provide a preliminary review of the application. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations. The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the information (not all agencies /departments have been contacted - -only those who have been determined to have primary interest. 1. a. Does the application (or can the development) meet requirements to be on the Public Hearing Agenda? ❑ YES placed ❑ NO b. If no, what is lacking? c. Public Hearing Schedule: Hearings before the Hearing Examiner are scheduled upon determination that the application is complete. Items will be scheduled for the first available public hearing. 2. After a preliminary review of the application what "Conditions of Approval" would be required of the development? (Attach conditions if necessary) O ! ad I 75 v 2a _ r � v • 4 ••- a��on • A V A iii ( Pth \ 4 _ c ; It sar 4 M F � 2 a A O a � J I I 4 / r c V 5 II Y Previte? f / off + . 1 7 1 J f _ ORS4SNO _ ^ LAKE !. 1 200 C E 7 J • n I/ "` •0 ,c V ••• J COULEE .Itt /5 17 0 - HITE >. nut L /3 EL. 137 �� /. at . . /4 W U /i a A A< 1401 •• ITT 1 .. £L IJO 2 i 2446 r 1�:'� 72r n.r \ j� i is Cw5w. C"..."""" 25 ^R 60 24 ' 0 / . SPrSprit, EL v n n GN 1 34 ate. 4 � 1603 •OV E LE Lincoln :OS si acobs EL.2166 0 27 j C' li '- — — cce It - - . ,: R \ . O o r Y � ai 1 001110a - -• h N N 1 — — x 0 x O0 B 0.../4s 0.../4s 5 M 1 1 m oon / ) Ha.r 72 0) as �f � 00r I .. 33 owis •q 1 7'' 6iM'^nn f 7736 si G f, 1566 4 3 2 f I c cis Will Payne Design Review m l/2 PARCEL NW %q, SWiq,SEi4 ' co'ESMr PARCEL NEk+,SW%q, SEi PARCEL ss , swk*: sr . I6o EsMr PARCEL Lass_ B SSW %4,SWGf,SE%4- /5 I ✓ALER /E LANE PER CL /ENT • • SCALE =+00 0 /00 500' /000' la � 12 7 13 Date. /0 - /0 - Scale: / -= 4-00 Drawn: /. 1V Checeed• Field Boon: PARCEL MAP 7 SW1 /4 OF SEI /4 OF SECTION 12, T26N, R40E, W.M. . SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON (JUDY O'CONNER TH /5 MAP 00E5 NOT REPRESENT A SURVEY REVISED PARCELS c $ p' Div 1 4/25/90 1 J. PAUL RAMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL E NGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS N. :0115 NEWPORT HWY., SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99218 PH: 46 7 -5261 ! Proiect No. 95239 Sht / of / SE %, SEC. 12, 7'26N R-OE N DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR TO: Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering Jim Red, Spokane County Utilities Department Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department Bill- Hemmings,rStormwatecU -,tility Greg Figg, Department of Transport tia on Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board Central Valley School District Fire District No. 1 Vera Water and Power FROM: John Pederson, Senior Planner V DATE: May 8, 1996 RE: Preliminary Plat of Valleyway Addition APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING MAY 23, 1996 AT 3:00 DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING 1" FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Division of Building and Planning encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the attached form to Steve Davenport for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Division of Building and Planning file (so bring three copies to the meeting). Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact Steve Davenport of the Division of Building and Planning at 456 -2205. c: Trout Creek Limited, 1928 E. Thurston, Spokane, WA 99203 Attachments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, Project Design, Site Plan • 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 BUILDING PHONE: (509) 456 -3675 • FAX: (509) 456 -4703 PLANNING PHONP (5091 456-9705 • Fey. (509) dRA_99d4 666 € g • ARE 41 03 , SL-- APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING Date: Department. Department Contact Person: Steve Davenport Action: Preliminary plat of Valleyway Addition APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING: May 23, 1996 at 3:00 Note: The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard before the Hearing Examiner. The following information does not provide a complete or binding final review of the proposal. This will occur only after the proposal is accepted and placed on the Public Hearing Agenda. The acceptance of the application and scheduling of the application on the Public Hearing Agenda is the primary function of this meeting. A secondary function of this meeting is to provide a preliminary review of the application. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations. The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the information (not all agencies /departments have been contacted - -only those who have been determined to have primary interest. Does the application (or can the development) meet requirements to be placed on the Public Hearing Agenda? ❑ YES. NO b. If no, what is lacking? P ct ttM„Litt€2 F Pte+ om t4auj DRA ii bier., 61 i LC- • 6e tear xc-J., fRgQ wean LO r M Af'Gt, c r304 . lee O6u »&S r4C- n 04/404660480) c. Public Hearing Schedule: Hearings before the Hearing Examiner are scheduled upon determination that the application is complete. Items will be scheduled for the first available public hearing. 2. After a preliminary review of the application what "Conditions of Approval" would be required of the development? (Attach conditions if necessary) (kit i F e 0 1z6a4% of AOlp urns. 576t47- a . - 70 - n -, ?tad LMTLC -e Of Dan/ ghee Ce„c 1. a. r Valleyway LOT• PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCATED IN SECTION 13. TOP 25 NORM. RANGE -44 EAST. WM. SPOKANE cowl wAL4SNGTOn wiumn— DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DENNIS M. SCO�., � � PF I V MAY 02 1996 Jim Red, Spokane County Utilities Department Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department Bill Hemmings, Stormwater Utility Greg Figg, Department of Transportation Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board Mead School District Whitworth Water District Fire District No. 9 Washington Water Power City of Spokane Public Works Developer Services City of Spokane Traffic FROM: Steve Davenport, Planner II DATE: May 3, 1996 RE: CLC Associates, Inc. Zone Reclassification APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING MAY 16 1996 AT 1:15 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING, 1 FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 1A Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Division of Building and Planning encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the attached form to Steve Davenport for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Division of Building and Planning file (so bring three copies to the meeting). Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact Steve Davenport of the Division of Building and Planning at 456 -2205. c: Steve Wilson, CLC Associates, Inc., 8480 E. Orchard Rd, Ste 2000, Englewood CO 80111 Attachments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, Project Design, Site Plan 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 BUILDING PHONE: (509) 456 -3675 • FAX: (509) 456 -4703 PLANNING PHONE: (509) 456 -2205 • FAX: (509) 456 - 2243 Tnn• (cm z9A_z1. K • SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER eF- Design Review for May16, 1996 at 1:15 Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) and Community Business (B -2) to Regional Business (B -3) Generally located west of and adjacent to SR -2 (Newport Highway), - approximately 1250 feet north of the intersection of SR -2 and Hawthorne Road, in Section 17, Township 26 North, Range 43 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban and within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) and Community Business (B -2) to Regional Business (B -3) for a 369,000 square foot retail sales facility and those uses allowed in the Regional Business (B -3) zone. PARCEL NUMBERS: 36175.9057, 9002 SITE SIZE: Approximately 39.89 acres APPLICANT: CLC Associates, Inc. Steve Wilson 8480 E. Orchard Road, Ste 2000 Englewood, CO 80111 (303) 770 -5600 ASSIGNED PLANNER: Steve Davenport Date: Department: APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING &AN/ r iu#' !/GW, Ertg SeeatcteS Department Contact Person: Steve Davenport, Planner II Action: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) and Community Business (B -2) to Regional Business (B -3); CLC Associates, Inc. APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING: May 16, 1996 at 1:15 Note: The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard — before the Hearing Examiner. The following information does not provide a complete or binding final review of the proposal. This will occur only after the proposal is accepted and placed on the Public Hearing Agenda. The acceptance of the application and scheduling of the application on the Public Hearing Agenda is the primary function of this meeting. A secondary function of this meeting is to provide a preliminary review of the application. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations. The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the information (not all agencies /departments have been contacted - -only those who have been determined to have primary interest. a. Does the application (or can the development) meet requirements to be on the Public Hearing Agenda? ❑ YES placed tig NO b. If no, what is lacking? teal vk IN Cc W-r41s'11-0E act,9ezin AJ /LC arr. c. Public Hearing Schedule: Hearings before the Hearing Examiner are scheduled upon determination that the application is complete. Items will be scheduled for the first available public hearing. 2. After a preliminary review of the application what "Conditions of Approval" would be required of the development? (Attach conditions if necessary) R APT as Obit Rltnvr(' - ll1Nera Cbrt Pena /- C Woo/Sian rat Pt gttc -- 711/Petrkn+ its vc5 ee avgkeArro (7FD S t0(7 cr'o eb : / lSta'utnt) .� C L C Associates Inc. TRACI A ROT J PETAL • "., PROJECT LOCATION 7 -- - 2: T .AC.LANOSCAPI -- L I I 20 TYPE LANDSCAPC \.‘ CLrl PETAL •.• - N' :2 : • : LOT = TRACT 0 CLOT it Rt:nr 20' TOR ■ LANDSCAPE 2123A1 r r N 'A, LOT ”r: 3 \ ,w4 • 2- r4PC L NOSCAPE ""'"'•-•:> .22)5; / /Y, / / / / 1. 7 ' iw LOT TYPE LANDSCAPE 2 • „ g „," H .;^ „ N F„ / // . / /7 4c, Faw, PP DEDICATION •R• P // or..■ an:at as saaar..a.a. 10011O L.J 44444.44.4.1 ww-•—w AA.. RI! SARA - a 4.• tricRIOSRUS at :■ 4444 / 4 7! ".. : odes!. Man ZORN RJR TO: DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM FROM: John Pederson, Senior Planner DATE: May 7, 1996 RE: c: Louis R. Becker, 8902 N. Forker Road Spokane, WA 99207 A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering Jim Red, Spokane County Utilities Department Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department cBi1k -Hemmings, Stormwater- Utility Greg Figg, Department of Transportation Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board Mead School District Fire District No. 9 Whitworth Water District Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential -.3.5 (UR -3.5) to Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING MAY 23, 1996 AT 2:15 DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING Pt FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Division of Building and Planning encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the attached form to Steve Davenport for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Division of Building and Planning file (so bring three copies to the meeting). Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact Steve Davenport of the Division of Building and Planning at 456 -2205. Attachments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, Project Design, Site Plan '1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 BUILDING PHONE: (509) 456 -3675 • FAX: (509) 456 -4703 0 Design Review for May 23, 1996 at 2:15 Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential -.3.5 (UR -3.5) to Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) Generally located south of and adjacent to Hastings Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 8, Township 26 North, Range 43 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban and within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential -.3.5 (UR -3.5) to Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) for eight duplexes and those uses allowed in the Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) zone. PARCEL NUMBERS: 36081.9122 PM. SITE SIZE• Approximately 2.49 acres APPLICANT: Louis Becker 8902 N. Forker Road Spokane, WA 99207 ASSIGNED PLANNER: Steve Davenport cc— APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING Date: Department: Department Contact Person: Steve Davenport Action: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential -.3.5 (UR -3.5) to Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING: May 23, 1996 at 2:15 Note: The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency comments to assist the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard before the Hearing Examiner. The following information does not provide a complete or binding final review of the proposal. This will occur only after the proposal is accepted and placed on the Public Hearing Agenda. The acceptance of the application and scheduling of the application on the Public Hearing Agenda is the primary function of this meeting. A secondary function of this meeting is to provide a preliminary review of the application. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations. The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application form and site plan by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the information (not all agencies /departments have been contacted - -only those who have been determined to have primary interest. 1. a. Does the application (or can the development) meet requirements to be on the Public Hearing Agenda? ❑ YES placed ❑ NO b. If no, what is lacking? c. Public Hearing Schedule: Hearings before the Hearing Examiner are scheduled upon determination that the application is complete. Items will be scheduled for the first available public hearing. 2. After a preliminary review of the application what "Conditions of Approval" would be required of the development? (Attach conditions if necessary) Louis Becker W 01 r )i y)P'3 / Y yam. / \ PROPOSED REZONE PORTION OF NEI/4 OF SECTION 8,'T26N, R43E, HAL. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON SCALE: 1" it 100' 0 50 ' '100 too SCALE: I' • 100' ET I LEGAL OIiSC1lIl'I ION UR•J3 Building lnlunnalon: Pe¢cnl of Building Coverage 55% MAXIMUM OF LOT AREA Building Use(s) RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX Lsr8ia_apcd Mean INDIVIDUAL LOT Type of Landscaping INDIVIDUAL LOT No, of Waking Spaces Required 12 SPACES Docent of Open Space (urla& cued mum 45% MINIMUM Building Setbacks . 55' FROM C/L OR 25' FROM RAY Existing Zone u) j Pro posed Lone(s) I A cos or Sq. P ' UR -9 I 2.49 ACRES VICINITY MAP All IIW cumin :cal propetly silualed in Ha NEI/4 of Scnion S, Township 26 Noah, Range 0 Ease, W M Spokane Cnunly, Waslinglon and (wing loo iculw ly deviled as follows: Mock 5 and lots 1, 2, 4 and 6, Block 3 FOREST GLEN FOURTH ADDITION as recorded In Plus Book 23, pages 71 and 72, Spokane Courtly Book of Reno dcd lung PIals. J PAUL RAMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS N. 10115 NEWPORT HWY. SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99218 PII. 467-5261 Bate 1d of : IO ILLI fl scal.. r Y • roo' - N 61902 FORK P 96117 Dour: .. cL ' N 8902 PORKER CIaoRUI. �w SPOKANE, WA 99207 ... ___ - Field Dad. SIC I of . MEMORANDUM March 11, 1996 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director c (d vt v--: 1" /..0 — TO: Bill Johns, P.E. Bruce Rawls, P.E. FROM: Dennis M. Scott, P.E. RE: Past Due Accounts Attached is a memo from Steve Case expressing some frustrations and asking for help with the past due accounts. He notes that the policy that we have tried to follow in the past apparently is breaking down and he is seeing that some reviews are still taking place even though there are amounts that are way past due. Once we give away our review, it is more difficult to get the collections done. Legal is not very helpful in this regard as the effort is not "worth" their time for the amount to be collected. I would appreciate any ideas that you may have to try and put a check in the problem so that the County can collect the amounts due. If stopping the review process is not something that staff wants to do, then what else should we try to ease the problem that Steve is faced? c: Steve Case W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 4564715 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 ”erg v. S P O IC A IN E � ° '� L � ty =" -r . C C U N Y c: ry 1�' cFk�. DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Date: March 11, 1996 To: Dennis Scott From: Steve Case Re: Past Due Accounts • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director While preparing my most recent billing, I noticed five plats /building permits that were reviewed, and shouldn't have been because they were on the Accounts Receivable list in Dave Berto's office at the time. Attached are copies of memos pertaining to this subject. I need some direction, as the current procedure is not effective. Thank you. 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 (9 Date: March 21, 1994 To: Bill Hemmings GA From: Dennis M. Scott, P.E. 4 Re: Past Due Accounts PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director On occasion there are new projects being entered into the system, or continuing work requested on existing projects, for parties that have a past due account. I have been informed by Mike Dempsey of the Prosecuting Attorneys Office, that we can refuse to perform work on any project, related or unrelated, until the monies due have been paid. Therefore, if this situation arises, please notify the party involved. Thank you. cc: Ron Hormann Steve Case ✓ Mike Dempsey To: Attached is a list of building permits and plats that are not to be filed /approved without approval from accounting. This is an alphabetical list by project number. There is a list in Dave Berto's office that is listed alphabetically by developer. These represent those accounts which have been relunctant to pay, and perhaps the only method of collecting is not to file or approve until all monies due have been collected. The accounts receivable list in Dave Berto's office is also to be used for not filing or approving, and also to be used to refuse to work on an existing project with a past due balance (see attached copy of a memo from Dennis Scott to Bill Hemmings dated 3/31/94). There may be ocassions where the name appears on the attached list, but not on the accounts receivable list. Either way, approval from accounting is required. Thank you. 8/25/94 Dean Franz Ed Parry Dave Berta Bob Turner Chris Reich Paul Lennemen from the desk of... STEVE CASE ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN III ri 1 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER • Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Date: July 20, 1995 To: Bill Hemmings A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director From: Steve Case Re: Past Due Accounts During my collection processes, for unpaid bills, I have noticed that plans are being reviewed for developers with past due accounts. This causes me to spend unnecessary time. Even though plans have not been filed, and we can assume that the bills will be paid eventually (unless they drop the project), I am still required to maintain consistency, and treat everyone the same. When receivables go back a few months, like Ed Tuohy's SP799A, then I reach a point where I should be referring his account to the Prosecuting Attorney's Office for collection. This puts me in a comprising position. In addition, this is in violation of the RCW. We are in effect loaning developers money for their projects. Also, we spend a lot of time providing you with accounts receivable lists, and updating them daily when we receive the mail. I would be willing to contact developers who have a past due account, with plans to review, if your reviewers don't feel comfortable with this. If there is anything I can do to help the situation, please let me know. Thank you. 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER • Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Date: August 1, 1995 To: Bill Hemmings From: Steve Case Re: Problem Accounts Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director Plans for project B92137, for Spokane Broadway Associates, were filed on May 25, 1995. This should not have happened because this is on my list "Do not file or approve plans without approval from accounting" in Dave Berto's office. Work was performed on this project on May 17th, which was not billed until June 7th, and the filing should have been delayed until this bill was paid. Also, plans for project B94196, for Robert Wesner, were filed on July 20, 1995. This should not have happened because this was on the Accounts Receivable list in Dave Berto's office. 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • William A. Johns, P.E., Acting County Engineer Date: December 14, 1995 To: Bill Hemmings From: Steve Case Re: Problem Accounts Plans for project B95124, for Jack Barb, were approved on November 22, 1995. This account was on the Accounts Receivable list at that time, and was also on the "Do not file or approve plans without approval from accounting" list in Dave Berto's office. Also, plans for project B95041, for Roy L Wyatt, were approved on October 11, 1995, and was on the Accounts Receivable list at that time. Plans should not be reviewed, approved, or filed, if the account is on the Accounts Receivable list. Plans should not be approved, or filed, if the account is on the "Do not file or approve plans without approval from accounting" list, without verifying with accounting that all charges have been paid. If there is anything I can do to help the situation, please let me know. Thank you. cc: Dennis Scott Bruce Rawls A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324.3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 Date: March 4, 1996 To: Concerned parties Memorandum From: Dennis Scott, P.E., Public Works Director Bill Johns, P.E., Acting County Engineer Bruce Rawls, P.E., Utilities Director Subject: Policy Release of Approved /Accepted Plans for Road, Drainage, and Sewer Construction 1. This policy supplements the provisions of Sections 5.00, 9.06, 9.10 and 10.01 of the May 1995 edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, and Sections 9.05, 10.01, and 11.01 of the 1981 Spokane County Road Standards, and addresses the acceptance /approval and release of plan sets for road /drainage and sewer construction. This policy applies to both residential and commercial permits. This policy is effective immediately. ...... ...:.:.. ............................... 2. Project plan submittals typically consist of separate plan sets for domestic water, for sewer, and for roads and drainage. The water purveyor typically approves water system plans, the County Utility Department approves sewer plans for projects in the County's service area, and the County Engineer accepts /approves road and drainage plans. 3. Spokane County Code Section 9.14.230 establishes a misdemeanor offense (up to $250 fine and 90 days in jail) for persons who work in the County right -of -way without a permit. The County Engineer has the authority to issue permits for work in the County right -of- way 4. In order to receive a permit, plans for the work must be approved by the County Engineer's office; plans for utility work are typically approved by other agencies "contingent upon the County's approval of road and drainage plans ". 5. There have been recent occasions where the Utility Department has approved the sewer plan set, and the Developer's contractor constructs the approved sewer configuration, without road plans which are acceptable to the County Engineer. When the final road plans result in changes to the horizontal alignment and /or the vertical profile, the sewer may no longer meet County Standards for depth of cover, location within the Right -of -Way, etc.,. The developer and contractor typically have a great deal of resistance to relocating and /or modifying the sewer (and sometimes the water lines), and the County Engineer is faced with the possibility of Policy Memorandum Release of Approved /Accepted Plans for Road, Drainage, and Sewer Construction March 13, 1996 Page 2 of 8 being forced to accept a road which does not meet the County Standards; as a result, the County's liability exposure increases. 6. In order to minimize the County's liability exposure, the road /drainage plan reviewers and the sewer plan reviewers have agreed to find ways to improve communication between the two sections as far as project status updates. For example, whenever the sewer plan set for a project is nearly ready for approval or acceptance by the Utilities Department, the plan reviewer for the particular sewer plan set is expected to inform the Development Services reviewer for that project's road /drainage plans of the sewer plan set status. Likewise, the road /drainage plan reviewer is expected to inform the sewer plan reviewer of the status of the road and drainage plans when that plan set is nearly ready for acceptance /approval by the County Engineer. 7. The aim of this procedure is to ensure that conflicts between the road /drainage and sewer plans, or unsafe /non- standard road alignment designs, are at least minimized. To this end, approved /accepted plans for sewer, roads and drainage, as a genral rule, will only be released simultaneously. The project plans consist of both the road /drainage portion and the sewer portion; in no case will either road /drainage or sewer plans be released separately, unless a Deviation has been applied for by the Project Sponsor, and approved by the County Engineer. The Deviation process is discussed in the Appendix to this policy. 8. Road and sewer plans are to be submitted to the Utilities Department and the County Engineer's Office simultaneously. In addition, the road plan submittal should contain the sewer information, and the sewer plan submittal should contain the road information. This may be acheieved by either a. Providing an information copy of the sewer plans with the road plan submittal, and an information copy of the road plans with the sewer plan submittal; or b. Showing the sewer information in half -tone on the road plans, and showing the road information in half -tone on the sewer plans 9. In addition, the road /drainage plan set and the sewer plan set will bear the same date of acceptance /approval, so that approval /acceptance expires on the same day for both sets of plans. 10. Permits generally will not be issued for sewer work or road /drainage work separate from each other; since the plans for roads /drainage and sewer work will bear the same approval date, the Policy Memorandum Release of Approved /Accepted Plans for Road, Drainage, and Sewer Construction March 13, 1996 Page 3 of 8 permit shall be annotated as valid for both sewer and road /drainage work. The permit shall also bear the project number and phase of the project. Policy Memorandum Release of Approved /Accepted Plans for Road, Drainage, and Sewer Construction March 13, 1996 Page 4 of 8 APPENDIX EARLY SEWER PERMIT RELEASE In some cases, release of a sewer construction permit may be in the best interests of the public. A Project Sponsor may request a deviation from this policy to obtain the release of a sewer construction permit in advance of County Engineer's approval of the road & drainage plans. Request of a Deviation does not guarantee that the Deviation will be approved. 1. APPLICATION: The Sponsor shall use the format as precribed by the County Engineer. The Deviation Request must include the following, as a minimum: A. The Sponsor will need to demonstrate that early release of the sewer construction permit is in the best interest of the public, or that a valid engineering -based justification for the early sewer permit release is appropriate. B. The Deviation must be accompanied by road and drainage plans which meet the appropriate design parameters. The County Engineer will conduct a cursory review of the road and drainage plans to ensure that (1) the road alignment meets the appropriate design parameters for the road classification and terrain, and (2) obvious conflicts between the drainage system and the sewer system do not occur. C. A Fee Agreement for the Road and Drainage plan review, if one has not yet been provided. 2. APPROVAL: The Deviation approval may contain Conditions of Approval as deemed necessary by the County Engineer to protect the interests of the public. These conditions may inlcude, but are not limited to, such items as Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control plan implementation; limits on the length & location of sewer to be installed; the timing of the installation; assumption of risk by the Sponsor; etc.,. The release date of an early sewer construciton permit will also determine the expiration date of the sewer, raod and drainge plans for the project. Failure to fully comply with any and all conditions of approval will result in revocation of the permit, until such time as the road and drainage plans are approved /accepted by the County Engineer. Policy Memorandum Release of Approved /Accepted Plans for Road, Drainage, and Sewer Construction March 13, 1996 Page 5 of 8 BACKGROUND If the road and sewer plans are not released concurrently, then these problems could (and do) arise when the road plans are found to propose substandard alignment, profile, and drainage features Sewer: Inadequate or excessive cover for pipe strength Safety of installation or maintenance workers due to excessive depth of cuts /structures Location of pipe and structures outside of the R/W Interference with drainage facilities Water: Inadequate cover - pipes freeze, or break due to traffic loads Location of pipe and structures outside of the R/W Interference with drainage facilities Roads: Inadequate stopping sight distance on tangent grades, and on sag or crest vertical curves Inadequate horizontal curvature for the road classification and design speed Placement of work without County inspection /observation - deficient work is placed and not corrected, leading to shortened service life and increased maintenance costs Tangent grades too steep for generally safe travel by the public Drainage: Interference from underground utilities increases maintenance effort on drainage and utility components; increased amounts of groundwater lead to early failures of utility components (such as groundwater seepage into sanitary sewer lines or septic drainfields) Inspection: Policy Memorandum Release of Approved /Accepted Plans for Road, Drainage, and Sewer Construction March 13, 1996 Page 6 of 8 The County Inspector's presence for sewer work tends to give the developer more ammunition with the "You approved it this way, so why do I have to move it ?" excuse. This occurs in spite of any warnings, agreements, or understandings that the developer is installing the work "at risk" Lot grading: Foundation elevations are generally driven by sewer elevations; foundations may need to be raised if sewer pipe elevation has to come up, or water lines may need to be relocated to provide minimum cover Foundation openings are driven by minimum requirements for grading; typically driven by the top of curb elevation RECENT EXAMPLES P1414 Riverwalk 1st Addition (Summer 94) Developer: Welco Engineer: North Idaho Engineering Permit was about to be issued for sewer work in this phase; road plans submitted at this time provided generally inadequate vertical curves, as well as a significantly substandard horizontal curve for Indiana (a Collector Arterial: 715' radius required, 300' radius proposed). As shown on the attached sketch, the sewer alignment approved in Jun 94 would has left the sewer as much as 15' outside of the curbline (up to 6' outside of the Indiana R /W) of the approved alignment for Indiana; there have not been any revisions to the sewer plans to indicate a sewer relocation, and appropriate easements will have to be granted to the County prior to acceptance of the sewer line. P1414A Riverwalk 2nd Addition P1414B Riverwalk 3rd Addition (Sep -Oct 95) Developer: Dean Housely Co. Engineer: IPEC "Scope creep" on original permit for Riverwalk 1st Addition led to the contractor installing the main trunk line to the South Valley Interceptor without a permit specifically for that work. The Contractor also installed the internal sewer lines for these phases, as well as the drainage and curb work for 2nd Addition, all without plans approved (sewers) or accepted (roads /drainage) by the County. As a result virtually all of the sewer construction was installed without observation by County inspectors, nor did the Policy Memorandum Release of Approved /Accepted Plans for Road, Drainage, and Sewer Construction March 13, 1996 Page 7 of 8 County observe any of the work preparatory to the curb and drainage work. The County Engineer issued a Stop Work Order until road and drainage plans were accepted (plan acceptance occurred on 31 Oct 95). Plat Final Approval for 2nd Addition will not be granted until Indiana is constructed accepted, and established. Since Indiana R/W won't officially exist until 2nd Addition finalizes, 3rd Addition Plat Final Approval will not be granted until 2nd Addition is finalized. P1556A Forest Glen 2nd Addition Developer: Ron Howes Engineer: Ramer & Associates Sewer excavation approaching 25' occurred; this apparently exceed OSHA allowances, even with a trench box. Fortunately, no one was injured, and the road profile did not result in sewer line relocation. P1556 Forest Glen Addition P1556C Forest Glen 3rd Addition Developer: Ron Howes Engineer: Ramer & Associates Sewer main and water to serve Forest Glen Addition were installed without plans approved for the roadway which would connect Guinevere Drive from the northerly end of Camelot through what turned to be Forest Glen 3rd Addition; a profile providing a 300' crest vertical curve was indicated at the north end of Camelot, but was not specifically approved on the road plans. Plan review for roads in this project revealed that at least a combination of a 500' VC and a 100' VC would be required for the road classification and the grades involved; this would have required that the relocation of at least 400' of water line in order to maintain minimum cover. The developer would also have had to relocate .560LF of sewer line in order to service basements or to avoid having pump units for several residences. After much ado, the speed limit in this location was down -rated from 35 to 20, and speed humps, rumble strips, and a traffic island were designed and installed in order to influence the traffic speeds. Road plans for Forest Glen 3rd were first submitted to the County on 9 Sep 93, and were approved 23 Sep 94; sewer plans were approved by the County on 14 Sep 93. P00045 Woodland Terrace Addition (Aug - Nov 95) Policy Memorandum Release of Approved /Accepted Plans for Road, Drainage, and Sewer Construction March 13, 1996 Page 8 of 8 Developer: Bill Lewis Engineer: Randy Hahn The developer received approval of the city utilities (sewer & water), and proceeded to work in the County's R/W for 15th Ave (established when the parcel was platted in 1907); road plans had not yet been submitted, must less accepted, nor had any permit been issued. The County Engineer issued a stop work order, later modified to allow limited sewer work in 15th. Water lines were installed approx. 8 Nov 95 without approved road plans and without permit for work in the County R /W. As of 9 Nov 95, plans have not been approved, nor is a permit in effect for any work other than blasting. Memorandum Date: October 27, 1995 To: Concerned parties From: Bill Johns, P.E., Acting County Engineer Subject: Policy Permits for Work in the Public Right -of -Way 1. This policy supplements the provisions of Sections 5.00, 9.06, 9.10 and 10.01 of the May 1995 edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, and Sections 9.05, 10.01, and 11.01 of the 1981 Spokane County Road Standards, and addresses the consequences of a developer's failure to obtain a permit to work in the public Right of Way. This policy applies to both residential and commercial permits. This policy is effective immediately. 2. Conditions of Plat Approval typically prohibit work in the Right of Way without a permit. Spokane County Code (sections 9.14 and 9.30) also prohibit work in the right of way without a permit. 3. In order to obtain a permit, a developer needs to have road and drainage plans that are approved (81 SCRS) or accepted (95 SCRS) by the County Engineer. No permit to work in the public right of way shall be issued for utilities (such as gas, electric, water or sewer) or for roads (and appurtenant drainage facilities) until plans prepared by a Washington State - licensed Professional Engineer have been approved or accepted by the County Engineer, or by his representatives. This includes the so- called "suicide" or "at- risk" permit. 3. There are two basic cases to consider: A. Case I: A developer initiates work in the public right of way (a) without approved or accepted plans (and, consequently, no permit), or (b) with approved or accepted plans, but no surety has been posted, then a. Surety for construction will not be accepted; all of the facilities for the project must be constructed by the developer, and accepted by the County Engineer, prior to plat finalization, or the release of any residential or commercial building permits. b. A "Stop Work" letter shall be issued to the developer by the County Engineer, and any contractors performing the work shall be "red- tagged" by the inspector from the County Engineer's Construction Division. The inspector and the development services section will need to work together to issue the Stop Work notices. Policy Memorandum Permits for Work in the Public Right -of -Way March 13, 1996 Page 2 of 2 The Stop Work notice shall remain in effect until such time as plans prepared by a Washington State - licensed Professional Engineer have been approved or accepted by the County Engineer, or by his representatives. B. Case II: A developer initiates work in the public right of way with approved or accepted plans (and surety has been posted), but without a permit, then a. Surety for construction will not be reduced or released until all of the facilities for the project have been constructed by the developer, and accepted by the County Engineer; b. If the plat has been finalized, then no building permits will be released until all of the facilities for the project have been constructed by the developer, and accepted by the County Engineer. If the plat has not been finalized, then the facilities must be constructed by the developer, and accepted by the County Engineer prior to plat finalization. c. A "Stop Work" letter shall be issued to the developer by the County Engineer, and any contractors performing the work shall be "red- tagged" by the inspector from the County Engineer's Construction Division. The inspector and the development services section will need to work together to issue the Stop Work notices. The Stop Work notice shall remain in effect until such time as a Right -of -Way permit has been obtained. 4. If the developer ignores the Stop Work letter, or the contractor(s) ignore the inspector's red -tag, then appropriate additional measures to enforce the Stop Work letter /Red -Tag shall be initiated as necessary to ensure compliance. March 13, 1996 Bruce Howard Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. 707 West 7th, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Subject: Inspection & Certification of Road and Drainage Facilities Dear Bruce: A clarification was requested regarding what the County requires for the inspection, certification and preparation of Record Drawings plans of the construction of road and drainage facilities. Inspection, certification, and Record Drawings are required in accordance with the current Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, Section 9.0. Site construction inspections and monitoring, material testing, and reporting, need to generally follow the WSDOT Construction Manual (M41 -01). A brief, overall description of what needs to be addressed by the sponsor's Engineer for inspection, certification and submitting Record Drawings are listed below. Road Construction Inspection & Monitoring Earthwork -cut: The Engineer needs to examine each newly exposed cut as soon as possible after it is opened, an inspection of the cut slopes and ditch cuts to locate any objectionable foundation materials or faulty drainage conditions which need to be corrected. Objectionable materials are those having characteristics which may cause an unstable subgrade. If objectionable materials are found, the Engineer needs to immediately recommend corrective measures and coordinate their efforts with the County. Earthwork- For placement of structural fill under roadways and facilities, the Engineer needs to monitor the compaction material, lift thickness, testing of moisture content and compacted density for each lift, and note compaction equipment used. The maximum density and optimum moisture content shall be determined prior to placement of fill, and relative density of each lift is to be reported by the Engineer through an inspection report. The Engineer shall test for in -place density at a frequency of approximately one test for 5,000 square feet of structural fill surface area. Subgrade The subgrade shall be uniformly compacted to the density specified. The Engineer shall test for in -place density at a frequency of approximately one test for each 200 linear feet of two -lane roadway or equivalent. Bases Letter to Bruce Howard page 2 March 13, 1996 Erosion Control Compaction testing of each layer of material is needed. During construction, each layer of surfacing material shall be checked for compliance with density specifications at the latest time practical before the next layer of material placed. Field tests for each layer placed is to be done at a frequency of approximately one test for each 200 linear feet of two -lane roadway or equivalent. Upon completion of placing and compacting of each surfacing section, and before construction of the surface treatment or pavement the Engineer shall ascertain the depth of the total surfacing and base course section by checking the depth under each traffic lane at intervals not to exceed 200 linear feet, measured along centerline. Pavement The Engineer shall prepare a written record of paving operations, including adequacy of base material, tack coat application, spreading and finishing, and compaction. The Engineer shall submit a report showing how the Contractor conformed to compaction and placement requirements. Concrete Curbs & Sidewalks The Engineer shall note what methods were used by the Contractor to insure that the foundation for curbs and gutters were thoroughly compacted and watered prior to concrete placement. The Engineer is to record the type and condition of the formwork as it pertains to specification requirements. The Engineer is to also record concrete placement methods and curing procedures. Recording of the weather conditions during concrete placement is also important. Drainage The Engineer is to go over the project, particularly during severe storms, closely observing the quantity and action of the storm water runoff to determine sufficiency of the storm drainage system. The placement of curbs, grates and culverts need to be placed at the proper elevation to insure adequate drainage of storm runoff. If underground streams and seepage zones are encountered, which were not anticipated or accounted for in the design, or if any other portion of the drainage system appears to be inadequate in the opinion of the Engineer, the Engineer shall notify the County, the Sponsor and the Contractor immediately. The Engineer shall diligently coordinate with these various parties in developing mitigative measures to address the problem. For construction of pipes and drainage structures, the Engineer shall check for conformance with the plans and specifications on the condition and methods of the pipe foundation, bedding, backfill and pipe grades. If an erosion control plan has been required for this project, the Engineer shall record what erosion and sedimentation control measures were implemented by the Contractor, and what sequence in the construction process. Note when silt fences, sediment traps /ponds are installed, construction entrances, and how well they are maintained throughout the duration of construction. If downstream properties is impacted by silt deposition from site construction, the Engineer needs to record when it occurred and what mitigative measures were initiated to Letter to Bruce Howard page 3 March 13, 1996 Material Testing Aggregates correct the problem. General: The Engineer must see that his inspectors are equipped with the proper tools to test and inspect materials and that arrangements are made to insure that material samples are representative, accurate and complete. It is imperative that the Engineer keep the Contractor informed of test results at all times. If the material being produced does not meet the requirements of the specifications, the Contractor must be informed immediately that is unacceptable, so that corrections can be made. The Engineer must keep a record of daily test results. The Engineer shall conduct sampling and testing as often as necessary each day of construction. Gradation and material testing and reporting of the rock material for conformance with the Specifications is needed for each material used. The Engineer is to watch for segregation of materials during all stages of manufacture, hauling, and placement. Pavements The Engineer shall test for, as a minimum, material gradation, Marshall test of the asphalt, and asphalt content. Concrete Curbs & Sidewalks The Engineer shall ascertain that the concrete work meets the requirements of the specifications, including but not limited to, testing for compressive strength, air entrainment, and slump. Submittals and Reporting to the County Inspection reports, material testing reports, and Record Drawings are to be submitted to the County upon the completion of each phase of the project. When the Engineer finds the construction work not in conformance with the plans and specifications, he shall notify the Contractor and the Sponsor immediately of non - conforming work. In the event the Contractor fails to immediately correct the defective work, it is the responsibility of the sponsor to rectify the situation. In the event the Engineer finds the need to revise the plans at the time of construction, he /she shall immediately notify the County of his/her intention, and shall coordinate their efforts with the County, the sponsor and the Contractor. Unless there is an immediate danger to life or property, the Sponsor is required to obtain written acceptance from the Sponsor's Design Engineer of plan changes prior to implementation and shall forward a copy of the approved plan changes and related calculations, to the County Engineer. The inspection reports, material testing reports, and Sponsor's Design Engineer Record Drawings are to be sufficiently complete so as to clearly demonstrate that every aspect of the project is in conformance with the plans and specifications. The Engineer is to submit the reports and plans to the County in an organized and complete manner, with the sponsor's Engineers /Surveyors certification statement. The Record Drawings need to reflect what was actually installed and constructed. Any changes in elevations and horizontal location of pavements, curbs and drainage structures, which are outside of normal construction tolerances, would need to be identified in the Record Drawings. We hope this information helps clarify what is expected of the sponsor's Engineer for inspection and Letter to Bruce Howard page 4 March 13, 1996 certification of the construction project. Sincerely, Sincerely, Spokane County Public Works Spokane County Public Works Bill Johns, P.E. Bill Hemmings, P.E. Acting County Engineer Development Services Engineer/Manager PROCESS REVISIONS 1. The Spokane County Code (§ 9.14.050) assigns responsibility to the project sponsor for plan preparation and construciton of the roads and drainage facilities serving the project developer is the key player. 2. The Fee Agreement for plan review charges is executed by the project Sponsor, or his agent. 3. Therefore, the County's privity of contract is with the project sponsor, not the Sponsor's Engineer or Contractor. 4. These modificaitons to the review process are needed: a. The Sponsor, or his Representative, shall attend the Pre - D ing conference with the Design Engineer and the County Engineer's representative for the project. b. All correspondence between the COunty and the Design Engineer shall either be routed through the Project Sponsor to the Design Engineer, or shall be sent to the Design Engineer (copy to Project Sponsor), as may be requested by the Project Sponsor. c. The appropriate forms for meeting agenda, correspondence, etc., shall be modified accordingly Memorandum Date: March 19, 1996 To: Concerned Parties From: Bill Johns, P.E., Spokane County Engineer Subject: Amendments to the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management Section 2.1, 1st paragraph: Add a new sentence: "...to which the proposed development shall drain. Topographic contours shall extend off the project site to the extent necessary to confirm the basin limits used in the hydrology calculations." Add this new 3rd paragraph: "Plans and calculations shall be submitted without enough detail and supporting data that an engineer, not familiar with the project, would be able to determine whether or not the standards have been met, that the design reflects good engineering practice, and that the conclusions reached by the Design Engineer can be arrived at." Add this new sub - section: "2.1.1 Master Drainage Plans: At the discretion of the County Engineer, a Master Drainage Plan (MDP) shall be submitted for those projects where phasing of the project will affect the functional usefulness of the drainage facilities. The Project Sponsor shall obtain the County Engineer's concurrence for the MDP prior to submittal of road and drainage plans; in some instances, the MDP may be required as part of a drainage concept plan prior to release of the project proposal for the Hearing Examiner's Agenda. "The MDP is to include as a minimum: basin limits and topography within the various drainage basins; existing drainage courses; schematics of proposed pond or conveyance outfall locations, water quality treatment facility locations, conveyance system locations; proposed easement widths, and maintenance access routes. "The MDP shall address phasing of the project and how the requirements of these Guidelines shall be met during the various phases. If significant changes occur in the proposed project layout between project phases, the County Engineer's concurrence for the updated Master Drainage Plan shall be obtained; prior to submittal of the road and drainage plans for the proposed next phase." Amendment'§ to the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater March 14, 1996 Page 2 of 6 Section 2.2 Revise the following Items to read: Add these new Items: Add this new Section: 2.2.1 Downstream Analysis DRAFT: "a. Hydrology computations. As a minimum, hydrology computations shall include a basin map with topographic contours, basin limits, the time of concentration path (with lengths and slopes of the various route components), north arrow, scale, existing identifiable drainage courses, proposed conveyance routes, proposed disposal (such as pond or pipe /culvert /ditch outlet) locations and project site (lots, roads, boundaries) layout clearly indicated, and a Downstream Analysis, if surface discharges from the site are proposed, in order to validate the existence of a legal discharge location." "d. Culvert and pipe system capacities and outlet velocities (preliminary and final)." "e. Ditch capacities and velocities (preliminary and final)." "g. Erosion protection calculations for channels and pipe /culvert outfalls." "h. References to, or extracts of data utilized for the analysis, whether or not contained in these Guidelines." "i. Other information as determined necessary by the County Engineer." a) When drainage facilities discharging stormwater onto adjacent properties are proposed, the Sponsor's Engineer is to perform a downstream analysis for all discharge locations discharging from the site boundary. The initial Downstream Analysis (Level 1) will generally be based upon a visual investigation conducted by a Washington State - licensed Professional Engineer, experienced in Civil Engineering. The analysis shall extend downstream a sufficient distance to identify any adverse impacts from the proposed drainage system associated with the development, but in no case shall it extend less than 1/4 mile from the project site. The Level 1 Downstream Analysis is to be provided to the County in a report format as prescribed by the County Engineer, with a written description and map showing each of the downstream conveyance routes from the proposed discharge locations. The report is to include a narrative description, as well as appropriate sketches or pictures of such features as: channel shape, size and slope; limiting drainage structures (if any); buildings or other structures which Amendments to the Spokane County Guidelines ' for "stormwater Management March 14, 1996 Page 3 of 6 could be potentially impacted; locations of existing erosion problems, and potentially erosive areas, all keyed to the map. The report is to also include a statement as to the adequacy or inadequacy of the downstream system. The report will be stamped, signed, and dated by a Washington State - licensed Professional Engineer, experienced in Civil Engineering. Any downstream drainage structures which have limiting conveyance capacity shall be clearly identified in the Level 1 Downstream Analysis. b) If during the Level 1 Downstream Analysis, it is determined that there is likely to be a limited conveyance capacity in the downstream system, or there will be adverse impacts to structures and homes, or there is or will be significant erosion in the channels, then additional work is needed. A hydraulic (Level 2) analysis is to be performed of the limiting capacity drainage locations identified in the Level 1 Downstream Analysis report. The hydraulic analysis is to •determine the actual capacity for conveyance or erosion resistance at the location in question, and to compare that capacity with the impacts of the proposed design flowrates. The Engineer shall propose possible measures to mitigate the impacts from the proposed project. Possible mitigating measures may include such actions as upsizing culverts, reconstructing drainage channels, or further restricting the discharge rate or volume from any proposed discharge location. A supplement to the Downstream Analysis report shall be prepared and stamped by the Engineer, and the hydraulic analysis, as well as a discussion of proposed mitigating measures are to be included in the supplemental report. The conclusions in the downstream analysis may dictate that volume release from the site is not to exceed the volume resulting from a storm event over the predeveloped condition. More stringent controls of release rates and /or volume may be required as a result of the downstream analysis. c) The report shall be provided to the County prior to final design of the drainage facilities and, when applicable, concurrently with the Master Drainage Plan, for review. The Sponsor's Engineer shall obtain concurrence with the County Engineer on mitigating measures prior to submittal of final road and drainage plans. Section 2.3 Revise Item 2.3.a to read "A plan and profile of all conveyance systems components Add a new Item: MUM "m. Other information as determined necessary by the County Engineer." Amendments to the Spokane County DRAFT': Guidelines for "`Stormwater Management March 14, 1996 Page 4 of 6 Section 2.4 Delete the existing section in its entirety Replace with: "2.4 Project Application and Certifications 2.4.1 Application Procedure The application and certification procedure for drainage facilities serving public roads shall be as prescribed by the County Engineer in the current edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction." Section 2.5 Delete the existing section in its entirety Replace with: "2.5 Construction Inspection Notifications, Construction Records, and Record Drawings "2.5.1 Construction Inspection Notifications Construction Inspection notifications shall be provided as prescribed by the County Engineer in the current edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. "2.5.2 Construction Records Construction Records shall be maintained anti as prescribed by the County Engineer in the current edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. "2.5.3 Record Drawings Record Drawings shall maintained, certified, and submitted as prescribed by the County Engineer in the current edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. Section 3.1: Delete the existing paragraph in its entirety Replace the existing paragraph with: "The minimum design storm event for analysis of onsite basins shall be as specified /Section 4 for the particular drainage concept and component of the drainage system. The minimum design storm event for analysis of offsite basins shall be the 50 -year return event. The County Engineer may require the use of a less- frequent (more intense) storm event for analysis of either or both onsite and offsite drainage basins, depending on the project location." Amendment'§ to t he Spokane Coun Guidelines for"`Stormwa'ter M g anaement March 14, 1996 Page 5 of 6 Section 3 -3.1, 3rd paragraph: Revise the entire paragraph to read: Section 3 -3.1, 5th Paragraph: Revise to read: Section 4 -2, 4th paragraph Revise to read: Section 3 -2, 2nd Paragraph: Delete the existing paragraph in its entirety Replace . the existing paragraph with: DRAFT "The weighted "C" factor shall be calculated using the unoff coefficients ( "C" factors) shown in Table la, page 6 -2 for the v rious types and quantities of ground cover in the particular drainage sin. The Design Engineer may use the "density- based" "C" factor , if calculations which show that the density -based method is more conservative are provided. The rainfall intensity ( "i ") will be based on Rainfall Intensity- Duration - Frequency (IDF) Curves developed from the current data appropriate for the project site. Raw precipitation data are usually available from the U.S. Weather Bureau, or at Spokane County. Raw precipitation data and the resulting IDF curves will be included in the drainage calculation submittal." "Table 11 (page G 17) shows soils classifications f r soils in Washington State. Hydrologic Soil Group classifications shall be based on the current listing developed by the United States Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS - formerly known as the Soil Conservation Service, or SCS)." "...in group B or C, respectively. CN factors shall be based on field observations. Calculations shall be based on CN's determined to the nearest 0.1, or rounded up to the next whole CN. In many areas of the country, lawns are heavily irrigated. This may significantly increase the moisture content in the soil over that under natural rainfall conditions. The Design Engineer shall evaluate and consider changes to the groundwater elevation due to lawn irrigation, or other non - natural water sources; impacts to drainage facilities and other structures, onsite as well as offsite, shall be evaluated, and considered in development of the drainage concept." "Minimum cover over culverts and pipes within a roadway shall be 1- foot per manufacturer's recommendations, considering construction loads and type of pipe bedding construction." AIIlendS.ritS to the Spokane County Guidelines for`Stonnwater Management March 14, 1996 Page 6 of 6 Section 4 -2, 10th paragraph Delete existing paragraph in its entirety. Replace with: "Drainage easement width shall consider the depth and size of the drainage facility, as well as provisions for maintenance and construction vehicles. Drainage easements shall be sized and located so as not to interfere with property outside of the easement. Site features shall be located so as not to encroach upon, or otherwise interfere with the drainage easement." Section 4 -2.1 Add a new paragraph: "Sizing of pipes, culverts and ditches: Pipe, culvert and ditch sizing calculations shall include preliminary sizing using an open - channel method such as Manning's equation or the FHWA HEC -5 method as appropriate. Sizing shall be confirmed using either a "backwater" (water surface) analysis for those portions in subcritical flow (Froude number < 1), or a " frontwater" (energy gradeline) analysis for those portions in supercritical flow (Froude number > 1)." Section 5, 1st paragraph: Add a new sentence: DRAFT "...within the root zone act on the required volume of runoff. High groundwater will adversely affect the water quality treatment mechanism of the typical 208 swale. Where water quality treatment is required, the Design Engineer shall consider the effect of the drainage concept on the groundwater levels; when elevated groundwater levels adversely impact the int intended water quality treatment mechanism, an alternate mechanism for water quality treatment shall be provided by the Design Engineer." Add a new last paragraph: "The floor of a 208 swale includes the level portion of the floor of the swale, and the sideslopes of the swale up to the 208 overflow elevation or top of drywell. The soil located in the floor of a 208 swale shall be a medium to well- draining material, with a minimum infiltration rate of 0.5 inches per hour. The Engineer shall provide a written statement which verifies that all '208' swales conform to this requirement. This written statement shall be submitted to the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to installing finished landscaping /sod and prior to final acceptance. The swale floor material shall be installed to a native soil stratum which also meets or exceeds this minimum percolation rate of 0.5 inches per hour." Section 2.1, 1st paragraph: Add a new last sentence: "Topographic contours shall extend off the project site to the extent necessary to confirm the basin limits used in the hydrology calculations." Add this new 3rd paragraph: "Plans and calculations shall be submitted without enough detail and supporting data that an engineer, not familiar with the project, would be able to determine whether or not the standards have been met, that the design reflects good engineering practice, and that the conclusions reached by the Design Engineer can be arrived at." Section 2.2 Revise the following Items to read: "a. Hydrology computations. As a minimum, hydrology computations shall include a basin map with topographic contours, basin limits, the time of concentration path (with lengths and slopes of the various route components), north arrow, scale, existing identifiable drainage courses, proposed conveyance routes, proposed disposal (such as pond or pipe /culvert /ditch outlet) locations and project site (lots, roads, boundaries) layout clearly indicated, and a Downstream Analysis, if surface discharges from the site are proposed, in order to validate the existence of a legal discharge location." Add these new Items: "g. Erosion protection calculations for channels and pipe /culvert outfalls." "h. References to, or extracts of data, technical references, or other resource materials utilized for the analysis, whether or not contained in these Guidelines." "i. Other information as determined necessary by the County Engineer, in accordance with the current edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction." Add this new Section: 2.2.1 Downstream Analysis: In order for that the County Engineer may be able to determine whether or not a project is located in a critical drainage area, the Sponsor's Engineer will need to provide an evaluation of the area intended to receive the runoff discharged from the project site. This evaluation is commonly known as a "Downstream Analysis ". a) When drainage facilities discharging stormwater onto adjacent properties are proposed, the Sponsor's Engineer is to perform a Downstream Analysis for all discharge locations discharging from the site boundary. The initial Downstream Analysis (Level 1) will generally be based upon a visual investigation conducted by a Washington State- licensed Professional Engineer, experienced in Civil Engineering. The analysis shall extend downstream a sufficient distance to identify any adverse impacts from the proposed drainage system associated with the development, but in no case shall it extend less than 1/4 mile from the project site. The Level 1 Downstream Analysis is to be provided to the County in a report format as prescribed by the County Engineer, with a written description and map showing each of the downstream conveyance routes from the proposed discharge locations. The report is to include a narrative description, as well as appropriate sketches or pictures of such features as: channel shape, size and slope; limiting drainage structures (if any); buildings or other structures which could be potentially impacted; locations of existing erosion problems, and potentially erosive areas, all keyed to the map. The report is to also include a statement as to the adequacy or inadequacy of the existing downstream system. The report will be stamped, signed, and dated by a Washington State - licensed Professional Engineer, experienced in Civil Engineering. Any downstream drainage structures which have limiting conveyance capacity shall be clearly identified in the Level 1 Downstream Analysis. b) If during the Level 1 Downstream Analysis, it is determined that there is likely to be a limited conveyance capacity in the downstream system, or there will be adverse impacts to structures and homes, or there is or will be significant erosion in the channels, then additional work is needed. A hydraulic (Level 2) analysis is to be performed of the limiting capacity drainage locations identified in the Level 1 Downstream Analysis report. The hydraulic analysis is to determine the actual capacity for conveyance or erosion resistance at the location in question, and to compare that capacity with the impacts of the proposed design flowrates. The Engineer shall propose possible measures to mitigate the impacts from the proposed project. Possible mitigating measures may include such actions as upsizing culverts, reconstructing drainage channels, or further restricting the discharge rate or volume from the proposed project location. A supplement to the Downstream Analysis report shall be prepared and stamped by the Engineer, and the hydraulic analysis, as well as a discussion of proposed mitigating measures are to he included in the supplemental report. The conclusions in the downstream analysis may dictate that volume release from the site is not to exceed the volume resulting from a storm event over the predeveloped condition. More stringent controls of release rates and /or volume may be required as a result of the downstream analysis. c) The report shall be provided to the County prior to final design of the drainage facilities and, when applicable, concurrently with the Master Drainage Plan, for review. The Sponsor's Engineer shall obtain concurrence with the County Engineer on mitigating measures prior to submittal of final road and drainage plans. Section 2.3 Revise Item 2.3.a to read "A plan and profile of all stormwater systems components, drawn in accordance with the current edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction." Add a new Item: "m. Other information as determined necessary by the County Engineer, in accordance with the current edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction." Section 2.4 Add a new 2nd paragraph: "The application and certification procedure for drainage facilities serving public roads shall be as prescribed by the County Engineer in the current edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction." Section 2.5 Delete the existing section in its entirety Replace with: "2.5 Construction Inspection Notifications, Construction Records, and Record Drawings "2.5.1 Construction Inspection Notifications Construction Inspection notifications shall be provided as prescribed by the County Engineer in the current edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. "2.5.2 Construction Records Construction Records shall be maintained and as prescribed by the County Engineer in the current edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. "2.5.3 Record Drawings Record Drawings shall maintained, certified, and submitted as prescribed by the County Engineer in the current edition of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. Section 3.1: Delete the existing paragraph in its entirety Replace the existing paragraph with: "The minimum design storm event for analysis of onsite basins is dependent on the proposed drainage concept. Design storm events for various drainage concepts are specified in Section 4. The minimum design storm event for analysis of offsite basins shall be the 50 -year return event. The County Engineer may require the use of a less - frequent (more intense) storm event for analysis of either or both onsite and offsite drainage basins, depending on the project location." Section 3 - 2, 2nd Paragraph: Delete the existing paragraph in its entirety Replace the existing paragraph with: "The weighted "C" factor shall be calculated using the runoff coefficients ( "C" factors) shown in Table la, page 6 -2 for the various types and quantities of ground cover in the particular drainage basin. The Design Engineer may use the "density- based" "C" factors in Table lb (page 6 -2), if calculations are provided to demonstrate that the density -based method is more conservative. The rainfall intensity ( "i ") will be based on Rainfall Intensity- Duration - Frequency (IDF) Curves developed from the current data appropriate for the project site. Raw precipitation data are usually available from the U.S. Weather Bureau, or at Spokane County. Raw precipitation data and the resulting IDF curves are to be included in the drainage calculation submittal." Section 3 -3.1, 3rd paragraph: Revise the entire paragraph to read: "Table 11 (page 6 17) shows soils classifications for soils in Washington State. Hydrologic Soil Group classifications shall be based on the current listing developed by the United States Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS - formerly known as the Soil Conservation Service, or SCS)." Section 3 -3.1, 5th Paragraph: Revise to read: "...in group B or C, respectively. CN factors shall be based on field observations. Calculations shall be based on CN's determined to the nearest 0.1, or rounded up to the next whole CN. In many areas of the country, lawns are heavily irrigated. This may significantly increase the moisture content in the soil over that resulting from natural rainfall conditions. The Design Engineer shall evaluate and consider changes to the groundwater elevation due to lawn irrigation, or other non - natural water sources such as septic drainfields. The Sponsor's Engineer shall evaluate and consider impacts from imported water sources to drainage facilities and other structures, onsite as well as offsite, in development of the drainage concept and final design of the drainage system." Section 4 -2, 4th paragraph Revise to read: "Minimum cover over culverts and pipes within a roadway shall be 1 foot per manufacturer's recommendations, considering construction loads and type of pipe bedding construction." Section 4-2, 10th paragraph Delete existing paragraph in its entirety. Replace with: "Drainage easement width shall consider the depth and size of the drainage facility, as well as provisions for maintenance and construction vehicles. Drainage easements shall be sized and located so as not to interfere with property outside of the easement. Site features shall be located so as not to encroach upon, or otherwise interfere with the drainage easement." Section 4 -2.1 Add a new paragraph: "Sizing of pipes, culverts and ditches: Pipe, culvert and ditch sizing calculations shall include preliminary sizing using an open- channel method such as Manning's equation or the FHWA HEC -5 method as appropriate. Sizing shall be confirmed using either a "backwater" (water surface) analysis for those portions in subcritical flow (Froude number < 1), or a "frontwater" (energy gradeline) analysis for those portions in supercritical flow (Froude number > 1)." Section 5, 1st paragraph: Add a new last sentence: "High groundwater will adversely affect the water quality treatment mechanism of the typical 208 swale. Where water quality treatment is required, the Design Engineer shall consider the effect of the drainage concept on the groundwater levels; when elevated groundwater levels adversely impact the int intended water quality treatment mechanism, an alternate mechanism for water quality treatment shall be provided by the Design Engineer." Section 5: Add a new last paragraph: "The floor of a 208 swale includes the level portion of the floor of the swale, and the sideslopes of the swale up to the 208 overflow elevation or top of drywell. The soil located in the floor of a 208 swale shall be a medium to well - draining material, with a minimum infiltration rate of 0.5 inches per hour. The Engineer shall provide a written statement which verifies that all '208' swales conform to this requirement. This written statement shall be submitted to the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to installing finished landscaping /sod and prior to final acceptance. The swale floor material shall he installed to a native soil stratum which also meets or exceeds this minimum percolation rate of 0.5 inches per hour." Enclosure UTILITIES DIVISION • N. Bruce Rawls, P.E., Utilities Director Date: March 25, 1996 To: Utilities Distribution From: Roxane LaSalle Subj: Draft Sanitary Sewer Ordinance MEMORANDUM A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director The enclosed draft of the Sanitary Sewer Ordinance is forwarded for your review and comment. Comments are requested by April 26, 1996. Distribution: Bruce Rawls Bill Hemmings Mick Flugel Dean Fowler Vern Jarvis Nancy Konn Jim Legat Stan Miller Jim Red Roger Rivers Brenda Sims Mark Stiltz Billy Urhausen Louis York 1026 W. Broadway • Spokane, WA 99260 -0180 • (509) 456 -3604 FAX: (509) 456 -4715 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 Spokane County Sanitary Sewer Ordinance - Draft - Issued For Public Comment March 22, 1996 • Comments Will Be Received At A Public Meeting To Be Held 4:00-6:00 PM, April 25, 1996 Commissioners' Assembly Room Publi Works Building (Lower Level), 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, Washington Or Deliver Written Comments By April 26, 1996 To Spokane County Utilities Attn: Ordinance Comments 1026 West Broadway Spokane, Washington 99260-0430 NOTICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY DRAFT SANITARY SEWER ORDINANCE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT The draft Ordinance adds a new Chapter 8.03 to Title 8 of the Spokane County Code to provide a comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Code. The ordinance details the County's requirements relative to pretreatment (as mandated by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 USC 1251 et seq.), sewer construction and special connection agreements; the associated fees and /or charges; and, enforcement provisions. The draft Ordinance is available for review at each of the following locations: 1. Spokane County Utilities, 4th Floor of the Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA. 2. North Spokane County Library, E. 44 Hawthorne Road, Spokane, WA. 3. Valley County Library, E. 12004 Main, Spokane, WA. 4. Main City Library, W. 906 Main, Spokane, WA. Note: Builders, contractors, consultants and realtors should contact their respective Trade Associations, as copies have also been provided to various local associations for review by their members. Tentative schedule for finalizing the Ordinance: Activity Tentative Date Draft Ordinance Available for Review /Comment Mar 22, 1996 Public Meeting Apr 25, 1996 Written Comments Due Apr 26, 1996 Publish Notice of Public Hearing May 16, 1996 Public Hearing & County Commissioner Approval May 28, 1996 Finalize Ordinance Jun 25, 1996 A "Public Meeting" has been scheduled for 4:00 -6:00 PM. April 25. 1996 in the Commissioners' Assembly Room, Lower Level of the Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway Ave, Spokane, for the public to comment and /or recommend changes to the draft Ordinance; or, written comments may be submitted by April 26.1996 to: Spokane County Utilities Attn: Ordinance Comments 1026 W. Broadway Ave Spokane, WA 99260 -0430 An ordinance relating to the public health and safety, repealing certain chapters in Title 8 of the Spokane County Code (SCC) and implementing a sanitary sewer code in new chapter 8.03. Spokane County does ordain: That SCC Chapters 8.04, 8.08, 8.16, 8.40 and 8.48 be repealed in their entirety, and a new chapter added to Title 8 of the SCC as follows: Sections: ARTICLES 1000 & 2000 - DEFINITIONS 8.03.1000 Definitions. 8.03.1010 Abbreviations. 8.03.1030 Act. 8.03.1050 Applicable Pretreatment Standard. 8.03.1070 Approval Authority. 8.03.1090 Authorized Representative of the User. 8.03.1110 BOD. 8.03.1130 Building Drain. 8.03.1150 Categorical Pretreatment Standard or Categorical Standard. 8.03.1160 Categorical User 8.03.1170 Combined Sewer. 8.03.1190 Composite Sample. 8.03.1192 Days. 8.03.1210 Director or POTW Director. 8.03.1230 Discharge- Direct, Indirect. Draft - 3/22/96 ORDINANCE NO. 96- Chapter 8.03 SANITARY SEWER CODE Page•1 8.03.1240 Domestic Wastewater 8.03.1242 Double Pluming Dry Side Sewer 8.03.1244 Dryline Sewer 8.03.1250 Grab Sample. 8.03.1260 Health Officer 8.03.1270 Industrial Process Wastewater or Process Wastewater 8.03.1290 Interference. 8.03.1310 Lateral or Lateral Sewer. 8.03.1320 Local Limits 8.03.1330 Lower Explosive Limit. 8.03.1350 Medical Waste. 8.03.1370 National Pretreatment Standard. 8.03.1390 Natural Outlet. 8.03.1410 New Source, Existing Source 8.03.1420 New User, Existing User 8.03.1430 Non - Contact Cooling Water. 8.03.1450 Non - Standard Strength Sewage. 8.03.1470 NPDES. 8.03.1490 On -Site Sewage Disposal System. 8.03.1510 Pass- Through. 8.03.1520 Person 8.03.1530 pH. 8.03.1550 Pollutant. 8.03.1570 POTW. 8.03.1590 Pretreatment. 8.03.1610 Pretreatment Program. 8.03.1630 Pretreatment Requirements. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 2 8.03.1650 Pretreatment Standard or Standards. 8.03.1670 Private Pump Station. 8.03.1690 Private Sewer. 8.03.1710 Private Storm Sewer. 8.03.1730 Prohibited Discharge Standards or Prohibited Discharges. 8.03.1750 Public Sewer. 8.03.1770 Sanitary Sewage. 8.03.1790 Sanitary Sewer. 8.03.1810 Sewage. 8.03.1830 Sewer. 8.03.1835 Sewer Standards Handbook. 8.03.1850 [Reserved] 8.03.1870 Side Sewer. 8.03.1890 Side Sewer Stub. 8.03.1910 Significant Industrial User. 8.03.1930 Slugload. 8.03.1950 Special Side Sewer. 8.03.1970 Standard Strength Sewage. 8.03.1990 Storm Water. 8.03.2010 Storm Sewer or Storm Drain. 8.03.2030 Suspended Solids. 8.03.2050 System of Sewerage. 8.03.2055 Temporary Sewer Connections. 8.03.2070 Total Solids. 8.03.2090 Twenty -Four Hour Flow Proportional Composite Sample. 8.03.2110 Upset. 8.03.2130 User or Industrial User. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 3 8.03.2150 Wastewater. ARTICLE 3000 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 8.03.3020 Mandatory Sewer Service -No Rights Created. 8.03.3040 On -Site Sewage Disposal Systems- Policy to Limit. 8.03.3060 Proper Connection of All Premises. 8.03.3080 Private Sewer to Serve Only One Parcel - Easements. 8.03.3100 Multiple Dwelling Units - Owner, Occupant Duties. 8.03.3120 Disorders on Private Premises- Prompt Repair. 8.03.3140 Non - Standard Strength Sewage - Special Arrangements. 8.03.3160 Duty Imposed -Who is Responsible. 8.03.3180 Unlawful to Dispose of Sewage. 8.03.3200 Prohibited Uses of Sanitary Sewer. 8.03.3220 Use of Storm Sewers, Combined Sewers, Natural Outlets. 8.03.3240 Prohibited Uses - Public Sewers. 8.03.3260 Obstructing Sewer Prohibited. 8.03.3280 Breaking Structures- Appurtenances Prohibited. 8.03.3300 Unauthorized Connection to Public Sewers. ARTICLE 4000 - PRETREATMENT Part One: General Pretreatment Provisions. 8.03.4020 Objectives - Application. 8.03.4040 Prohibited Discharge Standards - General Prohibitions. 8.03.4060 Prohibited Discharge Standards- Specific Prohibitions. 8.03.4080 Prohibited Discharge Standards - Prevention -To Whom Apply. 8.03.4100 Prohibited Discharge Standards - Affirmative Defenses. 8.03.4120 Categorical Pretreatment Standards. 8.03.4140 Applicable Pretreatment Standards Violations -Upset Affirmative Defense. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 4 8.03.4160 Local Limits. 8.03.4180 Level of Compliance Effort - Unreasonable Burden 8.03.4200 Construction of Pretreatment Facilities. 8.03.4220 Side.Sewer Manhole. 8.03.4240 Self Monitoring - County Inspections. 8.03.4260 Sampling and Analysis. Part Two: Wastewater Discharge Permit. 8.03.4280 Wastewater Discharge Permit Required. 8.03.4300 Times to Apply -New Permits- Renewals. 8.03.4310 Compliance Deadlines 8.03.4320 Contents of Application. 8.03.4340 Confidentiality. 8.03.4360 Signing the Permit Application- Reports -Other 8.03.4380 Decision on Permit Application. 8.03.4400 Permit Terms Required. 8.03.4420 Permittee Obligations. 8.03.4440 Slugload - Accidental Discharge Control Plan. 8.03.4460 Permit Performance Security. 8.03.4480 Permit Transfer. 8.03.4500 Permit Modification. 8.03.4520 Permit Revocation. 8.03.4540 Appeals. Part Three: Wastewater from Other Jurisdictions. 8.03.4560 Wastewater from Other Jurisdictions - Interlocal Agreements. Part Four: Reporting Requirements. 8.03.4580 Baseline Monitoring Report. 8.03.4600 Compliance Schedules - Progress Reports. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 5 8.03.4620 Ninety Day Compliance Report - Categorical Pretreatment Standards. 8.03.4640 Semiannual Continuing Reports. 8.03.4660 Changed Condition Reports. 8.03.4680 Slugload- Upset- Prohibited Discharge Reports and Notices. 8.03.4700 Sample Violation Report. 8.03.4720 Hazardous Waste Notification Report. 8.03.4740 [Reserved] 8.03.4760 Bypass Notification. Part Five: Administrative Provisions. 8.03.4780 Retention of Records. 8.03.4800 Director's Authority. 8.03.4820 Enforcement Remedies. 8.03.4840 Enforcement by County and Other Governmental Agencies -No Rights or Duties Created. 8.03.4860 Publication of Violators List. ARTICLE 5000 - GREASE INTERCEPTORS, OIL /WATER SEPARATORS, SAND TRAPS 8.03.5020 Grease Interceptors. 8.03.5040 Oil /Water Separator, Sand Traps 8.03.5060 [Reserved] 8.03.5080 Grease Interceptors, Oil /Water Separators, Sand Traps- Maintenance ARTICLE 6000 - SEWER CONSTRUCTION 8.03.6005 Sewer Installers. 8.03.6020 Inspections. 8.03.6040 Sewer Connection Permit Required. 8.03.6060 [Reserved] 8.03.6080 Sewer ULID Waiver Agreement. 8.03.6100 Costs of Installation and Connection - Indemnity. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 6 8.03.6140 Extensions -Risk. 8.03.6160 Eligibility for Sewer Connection Permit 8.03.6180 Permit Required for Each Private Sewer Connection. 8.03.6200 [Reserved] 8.03.6220 Sewer Construction Regulations. 8.03.6240 [Reserved] 8.03.6260 [Reserved] 8.03.6280 Enforcement Inspections. 8.03.6300 Excavation and Cleaning. 8.03.6320 Construction Plans - Private Pump Station. 8.03.6340 [Reserved] ARTICLE 7000 - SPECIAL CONNECTION AGREEMENTS 8.03.7020 Special Connection Agreements- Execution. 8.03.7040 [Reserved] 8.03.7045 Connection of Properties Outside County ULIDs. 8.03.7060 [Reserved] 8.03.7065 Temporary Sewer Connections. 8.03.7080 [Reserved] 8.03.7100 [Reserved] 8.03.7120 Special Connection Charge. 8.03.7140 Reimbursement for Construction of Public Sewer. ARTICLE 8000 - [RESERVED] ARTICLE 9000 - ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS 8.03.9020 Rates and Regulations. 8.03.9040 Payment - Delinquency -Lien. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 7 8.03.9060 Persons and Property Subject to Charges. 8.03.9080 Abatement of Public Nuisance. 8.03.9100 Suspension of Service. 8.03.9120 Equipment - Projects -Minor Expenditures. 8.03.9140 Responsibility for Sewers -No Duty. 8.03.9160 Penalty. 8.03.9180 Search Warrants - Administrative, Criminal 8.03.9190 Repeal and Savings. 8.03.9200 Severability. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 8 8.03.0000 CHAPTER This chapter may also be referred to as the "Sanitary Sewer Code ". ARTICLE 1000 - DEFINITIONS 8.03.1000 Definitions. These definitions apply to the entire chapter unless otherwise stated or clearly indicated from the context. 8.03.1010 Abbreviations. The following abbreviations have the designated meanings: BOD - Biochemical Oxygen Demand CFR - Code of Federal Regulations COD - Chemical Oxygen Demand EPA - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency GFC - General Facility Charge gpd - gallons per day IU - Industrial User 1 - liter LEL - lower explosive limit mg - milligrams mg /1 - milligrams per liter NPDES - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System O&M - Operations and Maintenance POTW - Publicly Owned Treatment Works RCRA - Resource Conservation and Recovery Act SCC - Spokane County Code SIC - Standard Industrial Classification SIU - Significant Industrial User SWDA - Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 USC 6901, et seq.) TRC - Technical Review Criteria TSS - Total Suspended Solids ULID - Utility Local Improvement District USC - United States Code 8.03.1030 Act. The "Act" means the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 USC 1251 et seq.). 8.03.1050 Applicable Pretreatment Standard. The "Applicable Pretreatment Standard" or "Applicable Standard ", for any specified Pollutant, is the most stringent of the standards reflected in: 1. The Prohibited Discharge Standards, General or Specific Prohibitions (8.03.4040, 8.03.4060); 2. Local Limits (8.03.4160 or imposed by the Director); Draft - 3/22/96 Page 9 3. Applicable State Standards; or 4. Categorical Pretreatment Standards (8.03.4120). 8.03.1070 Approval Authority. "Approval Authority" means the Director of the Washington State Department of Ecology. 8.03.1090 Authorized Representative of the User. "Authorized Representative of the User" shall mean: 1. If the user is a corporation: a. The president, secretary, treasurer, or a vice - president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision - making functions for the corporation; or b. The manager of one or more manufacturing, production or operation facilities employing more than 250 persons or having gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding $25 million (in second - quarter 1980 dollars), if authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures. 2. If the user is a partnership or sole proprietorship, a general partner or proprietor, respectively. 3. If the user is a Federal, State or local governmental facility, a Director or highest official appointed or designated to oversee the operation and performance of the activities of the government facility, or his /her designee. 4. The individuals described in paragraphs 1 through 3 above may designate another authorized representative if the authorization is in writing, the authorization specifies the individual or position responsible for the overall operation of the facility from which the discharge originates or having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company, and the written authorization is submitted to the Director. 8.03.1110 HOD. "BOD ", denoting biochemical oxygen demand, is the quantity of oxygen utilized in the biochemical oxidation of organic matter under standard laboratory procedure in five (5) days at 20 degrees Centigrade, expressed in parts per million by weight or as a concentration (e.g., mg /1). 8.03.1130 Building Drain. "Building Drain" is that part of the lowest piping of a drainage system which receives the discharge from piping inside the walls. of a structure or building to a point two (2) feet outside the outer face of a structure, wall or foundation and conveys it to the sewer or an on -site sewage disposal system. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 10 8.03.1150 Categorical Pretreatment Standard or Categorical Standard. "Categorical Pretreatment Standard" or "Categorical Standard" means any regulation containing pollutant discharge limits promulgated by EPA in accordance with sections 307 (b) and (c) of the Act (33 USC 1317) which apply to a specific category of users and which appear in 40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N, Parts 405 -471. [Cross References: 8.03.4120, 8.03.4500 -1] 8.03.1160 Categorical User. A. "Categorical User" means a user subject to regulation under a categorical standard. [Cross References: 8.03.1650, 8.03.2130] 8.03.1170 Combined Sewer. "Combined Sewer" is a sewer which conveys any category of wastewater, as permitted by the Director, and performs the functions of both a sanitary and a storm sewer. 8.03.1190 Composite Sample. "Composite Sample" means the sample resulting from the combination of individual wastewater samples taken at selected intervals based on an increment of either flow or time. 8.03.1192 Day(s). "Day(s)" mean working day(s) unless otherwise noted. 8.03.1210 Director or POTW Director. "Director" or "POTW Director" means the Director of the Spokane County Division of Utilities, or his /her designee. [Cross Reference: 8.03.4800] 8.03.1230 Discharge- Direct, Indirect. A. "Discharge" or "Indirect Discharge" are identical for purposes of this chapter. Unless otherwise apparent from the context, the term means a release of wastewater, sewage or effluent into the POTW. For purposes of Article 400, the term does not include releases of wastewater defined as sanitary or domestic sewage in 8.03.1770. B. "Direct Discharge" refers to any release of wastewater, sewage or effluent into the outside environment or natural outlet. 8.03.1240 Domestic Wastewater. "Domestic Wastewater" is wastewater of similar volume or chemical composition which is typically generated by residential dwelling units. Such wastewater typically includes 0.2 pounds of BOD, and 0.17 pounds of TSS, per one 100 gallons, all measured per capita, per day. The term is contrasted with "Industrial Process Wastewater" or "Process Wastewater" described in 8.03.1270, sometimes also referenced as "Non- Domestic Wastewater ", and is also Draft - 3/22/96 Page 11 distinguished from other categories of wastewater identified in 8.03.2150, paragraph A. ,8.03.1242 Double Plumbing Dry Side Sewer. "Double Plumbing Dry Side Sewer" is a sewer installed at the time of on- site sewage disposal system construction, which will connect the structure wastewater system to a public sewer, when the public sewer becomes available. 8.03.1244 Dryline Sewer. "Dryline Sewer" is a public or private sewer lateral that is intended for future use when authorized by the Director. 8.03.1250 Grab Sample. "Grab Sample" means a sample which is taken from wastewater or a wastestream on a one -time basis without regard to the flow in the wastewater or wastestream and without consideration of time. 8.03.1260 Health Officer. "Health Officer" means the Spokane County Health District Health Officer, or his /her designee. 8.03.1270 Industrial Process Wastewater or Process Wastewater. A. "Industrial Process Wastewater" or "Process Wastewater" is that category of water carried wastes which, during a manufacturing or commercial processing activity, comes into direct contact with or results from the production or use of any raw material, intermediate product, finished product, by product, or waste product. [Source: 40 CFR 401.11(q)]. The term is contrasted with "Domestic Wastewater ", described in 8.03.1240, and also distinguished from other categories of wastewater identified in 8.03.2150, paragraph A. B. The term includes two subcategories: 1. "Manufacturing Process Wastewater ", which is wastewater of a nature, concentration, or constituency traditionally originating from industrial or manufacturing customers. This generally includes sewage from one or more heavy industrial or manufacturing process sources or industrial cleanup procedures. It includes one process discharges or several commingled process discharges. 2. "Non - Manufacturing Process Wastewater ", which includes all other process wastewater. This generally includes wastewater from business, institutional or commercial customers which generate non- domestic wastewater components derived from a business or commercial process other than manufacturing or heavy industry. Examples of included sources are wastewater from commercial laundries, radiator shops and photo finishers, as well as wastewater from vehicles used for storage or transportation of wastewater, such as septic tank pumpers or haulers. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 12 8.03.1290 Interference. "Interference" means a discharge which, alone or in conjunction with a discharge or discharges from other sources: 1. Inhibits or disrupts the POTW, its treatment processes or operations, or its sludge processes, use or disposal; 2. Which causes or contributes to a violation of the City of Spokane's NPDES permit or prevents sludge use or disposal in compliance with any of the following laws: Section 405 of the Clean Water Act; the Federal Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA), including Title II thereof, commonly referred to as the Federal Resource Recovery and Conservation Act (RCRA); any State regulations contained in any State sludge plan prepared pursuant to Subtitle D of the SWDA, the Federal Clean Air Act; the Federal Toxic Substances and Control Act; the Federal Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act; or, any more stringent State or local law; or 3. Which would be designated as or would cause POTW sludge to be designated as "Dangerous Waste" under 173 -303 WAC (Washington State Dangerous Waste Regulations.) 8.03.1310 Lateral or Lateral Sewer. "Lateral" or "Lateral Sewer" is a sewer to which side or private sewers may be connected from adjacent or vicinal properties. The service area for a lateral is determined by the Director, based upon generally accepted engineering practices and subject to the practice of the Division of Utilities. 8.03.1320 Local Limits. "Local Limits" are provided for in 8.03.4160, paragraph B. They are specific to the City of Spokane's POTW. 8.03.1330 Lower Explosive Limit. "Lower Explosive Limit" is the lowest concentration of a gas -in -air mixture at which a gas can ignite. 8.03.1350 Medical Waste. [Reserved] [See Chapter 14, Laws of the State of Washington, 1992 Regular Session] 8.03.1370 National Pretreatment Standard. [See 8.03.1650] 8.03.1390 Natural Outlet. "Natural Outlet" is any outlet into a watercourse, pond, ditch, lake or other body of surface water or groundwater. It does not include connections to the County of Spokane POTW, authorized on -site sewage or stormwater disposal systems, or other authorized sewage disposal mechanisms or systems. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 13 8.03.1410 New Source - Existing Source. A. "New Source" is any person who is or may be a categorical user who has commenced operations or construction of a building, structure, facility or installation, after the date of publication of proposed categorical pretreatment standards under section 307(c) of the Act, which standards will be applicable to such user if thereafter promulgated in accordance with section 307 (c), provided that: 1. The building, structure, facility or installation is constructed as a site at which no other user is located; 2. The building, structure, facility or installation totally replaces the process or production equipment that causes the discharge of pollutants at an Existing Source; or 3. The production or wastewater generating processes of the building, structure, facility or installation are substantially independent of an existing source at the same site. In determining whether these are substantially independent factors, such as the extent to which the new facility is integrated with the existing plant, and the extent to which the new facility is engaged in the same general type of activity as the existing source should be considered. B. For purposes of this definition a person may be a categorical user . where, because of the nature of its business or industrial activities, statements or other objective basis, said person appears to become a Categorical User. The Director may identify persons subject to this provision. C. Construction on a site at which an existing source is located results in a modification rather than a new source if the construction does not create a new building, structure, facility or installation meeting the criteria of subparagraphs A.2 or A.3 of this section but otherwise alters, replaces or adds to existing process or production equipment. D Construction of a new source as defined under this section has commenced at the earliest time a person has: 1. Begun, or caused to begin as part of a continuous on -site construction program: equipment; a. Any placement, assembly or installation of facilities or b. Significant site preparation work, including clearing, excavation, or removal of existing buildings, structures or facilities, which is necessary for the placement, assembly, or installation of New Source facilities or equipment; or 2. Entered into a binding contractual obligation for the purchase of facilities or equipment which are intended to be used in its operation within a reasonable time. Options to purchase or contracts which can be terminated or modified without substantial loss, and contracts for feasibility, engineering, Draft - 3/22/96 Page 14 and design studies do not constitute a contractual obligation under this section. D. "Existing Source" means any categorical user other than a new source. This includes a person who becomes a categorical user subsequent to promulgation of an applicable categorical pretreatment standard, unless such user meets the entire definition of a "New Source ". [Source: 40 CPR 403.3(k)] [Cross Reference: 8.03.1910] 8.03.1420 New User, Existing User. A. "New User" means a non - categorical user that applies for a County building permit or who newly occupies any premises and seeks to discharge wastewater into the POTW after the effective date of this chapter or applicable amendments thereto, the same being 30 days after enactment. Any person that buys an existing premises already engaged in discharging industrial process wastewater as opposed to domestic wastewater will be considered an "Existing User" if the Director determines no significant changes have been made in the user's operations. B. "Existing User" means a non - categorical user other than a new user. [Cross Reference: 8.03.1910] 8.03.1430 Non - Contact Cooling Water. "Non- Contact Cooling Water" is that category of wastewater consisting of water used for cooling, generally in an industrial or manufacturing process, which does not come into direct contact with any raw material, intermediate product, waste product or finished product. The term excludes other categories of wastewater identified in 8.03.2150, paragraph A. 8.03.1450 Non - Standard Strength Sewage. "Non- Standard Strength Sewage" is wastewater accepted for discharge into the POTW but which does not meet the criteria for acceptance as standard strength sewage, whether because of special characteristics, special treatment requirements, special monitoring, or additional handling as a condition of acceptance. Specific criteria defining this class of wastewater are determined by the Director, in the exercise of sound discretion, considering the purposes set forth in this chapter, the public health, safety and welfare, and cost and expense to the POTW. The Director may further consider average .concentrations of total suspended solids, BOD and phosphorus or other factors, and may include any wastewater determined by the Director to have any of the following characteristics: 1. Containing more than 215 milligrams per liter of total suspended solids (TSS); 2. Containing more than 260 milligrams per liter of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) ; or Draft - 3/22/96 Page 15 3. Any other non - standard strength sewage, as defined by statute, ordinance, regulation, or by Director's order. [Cross Reference: 8.03.2150 -B, 8.03.3140, 8.03.3240 -B] 8.03.1470 NPDES. "NPDES" refers to the "National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System" permit program administered by the Washington State Department of Ecology. 8.03.1490 On -Site Sewage Disposal System. "On -Site Sewage Disposal System" is any system or combination of piping, treatment, or other facilities that stores, treats, and /or disposes of sewage and effluent on the property where it originates, or on adjacent or nearby property under the ownership of the user of the system or in which the user has a recorded interest for the purpose of maintaining the system on such other property. In general, these include, but are not limited to septic tank disposal systems. 8.03.1510 Pass- Through. "Pass- through" means a discharge which exits the POTW into waters of the United States in quantities or concentrations which, alone or in conjunction with a discharge or discharges from other sources, is a cause of a violation of any requirement of the POTW's NPDES permit (including an increase in the magnitude or duration of a violation). [Source: 40 CFR 403.3(n)] 8.03.1520 Person. "Person" is an all inclusive reference to any individual or group, firm, association, , partnership, political subdivision, government agency, municipality, industry, public or private corporation, or any other entity. 8.03.1530 pH. "pH" is the negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion concentration. 8.03.1550 Pollutant. "Pollutant" is any substance proscribed or limited with respect to its introduction into the POTW by Federal or State pretreatment regulatory requirements, or by requirements adopted pursuant to this chapter reflecting the County's Wastewater Pretreatment Program. 8.03.1570 POTW. "POTW" means a treatment works as defined by section 212 of the Act, which is owned by a State or municipality (as defined by section 502(4) of the Act). This definition includes any devices and systems used in the storage, treatment, recycling and reclamation of municipal wastewater or industrial wastes of a liquid nature. It also includes public sewers, pipes and other conveyances only if they convey wastewater to a POTW Treatment plant. The term may also refer to the municipality as defined in section 502(4) of the Act, which has jurisdiction over the discharges to and from such a treatment works. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 16 For purposes of any enforcement work performed by the City under County authorization, the term includes the sewage system of Spokane County as well as the City of Spokane. [Source: 40 CFR 403.3(o)] 8.03.1590 Pretreatment. "Pretreatment" means the reduction of the amount of pollutants, the elimination of pollutants, or the alteration of the nature of pollutant properties in wastewater prior to or in lieu of discharging or otherwise introducing such pollutants into a POTW. The reduction or alteration may be obtained by physical, chemical or biological processes, process changes or by other means, except as prohibited by 40 CFR 403.6(d) and this chapter, including paragraph F of 8.03.4120. [Source: 40 CFR 403.3(q)] 8.03.1610 Pretreatment Program "Pretreatment Program" or "Wastewater Pretreatment Program" is that set of County requirements, principally embodied in these definitions and Article 400 of this chapter, together with regulations, policies, orders and individual permit requirements, and applicable provisions of the Act and Title 40 CFR relating to pretreatment, monitoring, sampling and conditioning of wastewater prior to discharge into the POTW. 8.03.1630 Pretreatment Requirements. "Pretreatment Requirements" means any substantive or procedural requirement related to pretreatment imposed on a user, other than a pretreatment standard. 8.03.1650 Pretreatment Standard or Standard. A. "Pretreatment Standard ", "National Pretreatment Standard" or "Standard" means any regulation containing pollutant discharge limits, promulgated by the EPA in accordance with section 307 (b) and (c) of the Act, which applies to users. This term includes prohibited discharge limits established pursuant to 40 CFR 403.5, categorical pretreatment standards, and Federal standards as identified in this chapter. [Source: 40 CFR 403.3(j)] B. Sources of pretreatment standards include prohibited discharge standards, categorical pretreatment standards, and local limits, all as may be more specifically set forth in Article 400 or in rules or regulations promulgated as a part of the County's Pretreatment Program. [See 8.03.1370] [Cross Reference: 8.03.4160] 8.03.1670 Private Pump Station. "Private Pump Station" is an appurtenance of a side sewer, private sewer, or on -site sewage disposal system which, alone or in conjunction with the side sewer or private sewer, conveys standard strength sewage or effluent by lifting or pumping to another sewer. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 17 8.03.1690 Private Sewer. "Private Sewer" is a sewer not owned or maintained by the Division of Utilities. 8.03.1710 Private Storm Sewer. "Private Storm Sewer" is a storm sewer not owned or maintained by a public authority and connected to a public sewer or discharged into a natural outlet. 8.03.1730 Prohibited Discharge Standards or Prohibited Discharges. "Prohibited Discharge Standards" or "Prohibited Discharges" means absolute prohibitions against the discharge of certain substances. For purposes of this chapter, these prohibitions appear in 8.03.4040 and 8.03.4060. 8.03.1750 Public Sewer. "Public Sewer" is a sewer owned or controlled and maintained by a public authority. The term includes any publicly controlled and maintained sanitary or other, storm or combined sewers. It does not include side sewers, side sewer stubs after connection to the sewer, or private sewers. [Cross Reference: 8.03.1790] 8.03.1770 Sanitary Sewage. "Sanitary Sewage" is redefined as "Domestic Wastewater" in 8.03.1240. 8.03.1790 Sanitary Sewer. "Sanitary Sewer" is a sewer which conveys sanitary sewage. Additionally, the term is also applied to any public sewer except a storm sewer. 8.03.1810 Sewage. "Sewage" is a combination of the water carried wastes from domestic, business, commercial, industrial or manufacturing sources, including residences, business buildings, institutions and industrial establishments. Sewage also includes surface water and storm water when discharged into a sewer. 8.03.1830 Sewer. "Sewer" is a pipe, conduit, structure, or appurtenance for conveying sewage. These definitions further identify this term according to who owns or maintains the sewer: private sewer, private storm sewer, side sewer, or special side sewer, as opposed to public sewers. In general, public sewers are also subdivided according to what they convey: sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and combined sewer. The term sewer also includes any dryline sewer. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 18 8.03.1835 Sewer Standards Handbook. "Sewer Standards Handbook" refers to the ^Spokane County Standards Handbook for Road. and Sewer Construction" which details proper controls for design, inspection and construction of sewer systems in conformance with this chapter. The standards may contain specifications relative to materials, design, construction, procedure, policy, inspection, backfilling and responsibilities in sewer installations. [Cross Reference: 8.03.6220] 8.03.1850 [Reserved] 8.03.1870 Side Sewer. "Side Sewer" is a sewer, not directly controlled or maintained by a public authority, which begins two (2) feet outside the outer face of a structure wall or foundation, conveying wastewater from the building(s) drain(s) to a public sewer or private sewer. The term side sewer also includes any double plumbing dry side sewer and temporary sewer connections.- 8.03.1890 Side Sewer Stub. "Side Sewer Stub" is that portion of a side sewer, located between the public sewer line and a point near the property line of the premises to be served. After connection has been made to the premises, the side sewer stub shall become part of a side sewer and shall be maintained by the property owner to the point of entry into the public sewer. 8.03.1910 Significant Industrial User. "Significant Industrial User" means: 1. All users subject to categorical pretreatment standards, also referenced as a "categorical user " 2. Any other user, also referenced as "non- categorical user ", that: a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the POTW, excluding sanitary sewage, non- contact cooling water and boiler blowdown wastewater. As used here, "boiler blowdown water" means specially treated water to render it suitable for use inside high pressure boilers; b. Contributes process wastewater which makes up five percent (5 %) or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic capacity of the POTW treatment plant; or c. Is designated as such by the Director on the basis that the user has a reasonable potential for adversely affecting the POTW's operation or for violating any pretreatment standard or requirement (in accordance with this chapter or 40 CFR.403.8(f)(6)); and d. Any user so designated by this chapter, or by regulation or order of the Director, considering pollutant characteristics, the concentration or mass loading limits established by Federal or State standards or by Draft - 3/22/96 Page 19 standards locally developed to address POTW or environmental conditions. [Source: 40 CFR 403.3(t)]; and /or 3. A user may be both a categorical and a non- categorical user, and shall comply with any respective provisions, as may apply. For purposes of definition, "categorical users" are further broken down into classifications of "new source" or "existing source ", as defined in 8.03.1410. "Non- categorical users" are broken down into classifications of "new user" or "existing user" as defined in 8.03.1420. [Source: 40 CFR 403.3(t)] 8.03.1930 Slugload "Slugload" means [Cross Reference: 8.03.2130]: 1. Any discharge at a flow rate or concentration which could cause a violation of the Prohibited Discharge Standards in this chapter; or 2. Any discharge not of a routine, regular, or episodic nature, including but not limited to an accidental spill or a non - customary batch discharge. 8.03.1950 Special Side Sewer. "Special Side Sewer" is a side sewer connected to a lateral or other public or private sewer which is outside the normal service area of said sewer as determined by the Director. Unless otherwise indicated or required by the context, all side sewer requirements shall apply to special side sewers. 8.03.1970 Standard Strength Sewage. "Standard Strength Sewage" is wastewater which complies with specifications designated by the Director, County resolution, or this chapter as not requiring special treatment, monitoring or additional handling prior to acceptance by the POTW, considering chemical, physical, and organic content, including but not limited to BUD, suspended solids and phosphorus. The definition of Standard Strength Sewage may be adjusted by Spokane County by resolution. [Cross Reference: 8.03.2150 -B] 8.03.1990 Storm Water. "Storm Water" is that category of wastewater consisting of flows occurring during or following any form of natural precipitation, and resulting from such precipitation, including snow melt. This includes but is not limited to flows discharged from roof, yard, footing, springs, pools and storm drains of any type. The term is distinguished from other categories of wastewater identified in 8.03.2150, paragraph A. 8.03.2010 Storm Sewer or Storm Drain. "Storm Sewer" or "Storm Drain" is a sewer which conveys storm water. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 20 8.03.2030 Suspended Solids. "Suspended Solids" means the total suspended matter that floats on the surface of or is suspended in water, wastewater, or other liquid, and which is removable by laboratory filtering. 8.03.2050 System of Sewerage. "System of Sewerage" is the system of sewers, outfalls, works, plants and facilities for wastewater collection, treatment and disposal, or any and all such facilities of the County used or dedicated to provide public sewer service. 8.03.2055 Temporary Sewer Connections. "Temporary Sewer Connections" are sewer connections for structures such as temporary offices at a construction site. [Cross Reference: 8.03.7065] 8.03.2070 Total Solids. "Total solids" are all matter that can be removed by total evaporation as contained in the manual of "Standard Methods ", under total residue. 8.03.2090Twenty -Four Hour Flow Proportional Composite Sample. "Twenty -four Hour Flow Proportional Composite Sample" is a composite sample, taken over a period of 24 hours, in which the size and numbers of the individual samples in the composite reflect the discharge rate at the time each individual sample is taken. 8.03.2110 Upset "Upset" means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary non - compliance with categorical pretreatment standards because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the user. An upset does not include non - compliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation. 8.03.2130 User or Industrial User. A. "User" or "Industrial User" means any person who is a source of discharge, also sometimes referenced as indirect discharge.. B. "Categorical user" and "non- categorical user" are subgroups within the definition of "significant industrial user" in 8.03.1910. [Source: 40 CFR 403.3(b) and (h)] [Cross References: 8.03.1230, 8.03.1410, 8.03.1420] 8.03.2150 Wastewater. A. "Wastewater" includes anything released into the POTW and generally includes water carried wastes from domestic, business, commercial, manufacturing or industrial sources. For purposes of reference, four categories of wastewater, based on its generic source, are identified in usage: Draft - 3/22/96 Page 21 1. "Sanitary sewage ", defined in 8.03.1770 as redefined under "domestic wastewater" in 8.03.1240; 2. "Storm water ", defined in 8.03.1990; 3. "Industrial process wastewater" or "process wastewater ", defined in 8.03.1270; and 4. "Non- contact cooling water ", defined in 8.03.1430. B Additionally, "wastewater" is divided into two general classes for purposes of rates and treatment requirements: 1. "Standard strength sewage ", defined in 8.03.1970; and 2. "Non- standard strength sewage ", defined in 8.03.1450. C. "Domestic wastewater" is identified in 8.03.124. ARTICLE 3000 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 8.03.3020 Mandatory Sewer Service -No Rights Created. A. No wastewater, except storm water, shall be directly discharged into a natural outlet within Spokane County. All wastewater, sewage, wastes and waters generated in Spokane County, except storm water, must be discharged into the POTW of Spokane County and /or into authorized on -site sewage disposal systems. This obligation applies to the owner of the premises and to persons in possession, charge, or control of the premises where prohibited discharges either originate or occur. (Cross Reference: 8.03.3160] B. This chapter shall not create rights for any individual or group to require construction of public sewers, connection thereto, or otherwise to receive sewer service from Spokane County. The County reserves all rights to deny, limit, or curtail service. 8.03.3040 On -Site Sewage Disposal Systems - Policy to Limit. A. It is the policy and intent of Spokane County, the City of Spokane, the Spokane County Health District and various other agencies of the State and Federal governments that on -site sewage disposal be limited and discouraged, and, except where specifically authorized by permit regulations, prohibited in all areas and that all sewage be discharged into the POTW. B. No on -site sewage disposal system requiring a permit from the Spokane County Health District may be constructed, altered, used or maintained without a written permit from the Health Officer certifying that it meets the requirements of the Health District. On -site sewage disposal systems must also meet the requirements of the Director and this chapter. C. An on -site sewage disposal system is not permitted when: Draft - 3/22/96 Page 22 1. Public sewer service is available, as defined in paragraph D below; 2. For any premises occupied by a significant industrial user; or 3. The public health or safety would be adversely affected. D. For purposes of this section, public ,sewer service is deemed "available" when determined by the Director and: 1. A street, highway, alley or easement in which a public sewer is located runs within any point 200 feet or less from.the boundaries of the premises concerned and the Director determines that such connection is feasible; or 2. A street, highway, alley or easement in which a public sewer is located runs within a distance greater than 200 feet from the boundaries of the premises, the anticipated sewage flow from the premises is greater than 1,000 gallons per day and the Director determines that such connection is feasible; E. Every owner, agent or occupant of any property constructing, using or maintaining an on -site sewage disposal system after public sewer service becomes available, shall discontinue use of the on -site facility and connect to the POTW, through the County's general sewerage system and in the manner specified in 8.03.3060, upon the earlier of: 1. The time the on -site system fails, or requires pumping, repair or replacement; or 2. within one (1) year after public sewer service became available. The Director may extend the one year time frame for good cause. [Cross Reference: 8.03.3060 -D) F. Public sewer as used in this section means a sewer comprising part of the Spokane County General Sewerage System and not an interim public sewer. 8.03.3060 Proper Connection of All Premises. A. Every owner, agent, or occupant of any structure or premises used for human occupancy, employment, recreation, or other purposes requiring sanitary facilities, or when the Director or Health Officer so orders, shall construct or cause to be constructed all necessary sanitary facilities and a proper and sufficient sewer for connection to the public sewer, in accord with Spokane County requirements, unless specifically exempted therefrom in writing by the Director or Health Officer. E. A separate and independent side sewer shall he provided for each parcel of land, except as authorized by the Director C. The side sewer provided shall connect said building, structure or property, and all toilets, commercial grease interceptors, oil /water separators, sand traps, pipes and fixtures therein used as a receptacle of or conductor of wastewater, to the public sewer. Except for existing commercial grease interceptors, oil /water separators and sand traps, all connections to drywells, cesspools, septic tanks or other on -site sewage disposal facilities Draft - 3/22/96 Page 23 shall be removed or bypassed, and said facilities shall be abandoned according to Spokane County Health District and Spokane County Division of Utilities regulations and /or standards. (Cross References: 8.03.1835, 8.03.6220] D. Upon discovery of a violation of this section, a Notice of Non - Compliance may be given to the owner, agent or person in possession, charge, or control of the premises and may allow up to 30 days for compliance; provided, a longer or shorter time may be set by the Director or Health Officer as may be deemed necessary to protect the public health and safety; provided further, in no event shall this extend the requirements of subparagraph E.2 of 8.03.3040. No notice is required prior to or as a condition of taking any enforcement action. 8.03.3080 Private Sewer to Serve Only One Parcel- Easements. A. As an additional condition of allowing connection of a private sewer, the property owner may be required to execute and record at her /his expense an easement appurtenant to and for the benefit of premises crossed by a private sewer on a form supplied by the Director. Said easement shall be in a form approved by the Prosecuting Attorney. It shall run with the land and allow perpetual access to said private sewer through all premises crossed. Grantors of property crossed by a private sewer shall mutually covenant to maintain said sewer for the use and enjoyment of all premises crossed or affected, as determined by the Director. B. Said easement shall not be subject to revocation without the written approval of the Director. The County shall have no maintenance or repair obligations for said private sewer, and shall be held harmless from any liabilities or damages involving the private sewer. 8.03.3100 Multiple Dwelling Units - Owner - Occupant Duties. A. Every owner, agent, and /or person in possession, charge, or control of any hotel, motel, mobile home park, condominium, apartment house, or other multiple dwelling unit arrangement shall furnish, adequate means of disposing of wastewater originating from the premises, as are approved by the Director. This section is supplemental to authority which may be exercised by other County officials. B. In cases of hotels, motels, mobile home parks, condominiums, apartment houses, other multiple dwelling unit arrangements, or any other areas the Director deems to require public sewer service, the Director may require multiple tenants or the property owners to appoint an agent or agents responsible and accountable to the County for making payment for public sewer service whenever multiple billings are deemed unreliable or inconvenient. Failure of an agent to discharge any duty imposed by this section shall not relieve any property owner, tenant, occupant, customer or any other person of any legal obligation imposed herein and the County reserves all rights and remedies at contract and law. 8.03.3120 Disorders on Private Premises - Prompt Repair. A. When any sewer, pipe, drain, or on -site sewage disposal system located on private premises becomes obstructed, broken, out -of- order, or otherwise Draft - 3/22/96 Page 24 inoperative, the Health Officer or the Director shall, if the owner of such private facilities or his /her agent fails to correct the problem after two (2) days notice to do so, and upon a determination that the public health and safety is or could be endangered thereby, cause such sewer to be removed, reconstructed, repaired, pumped, altered, or cleansed, as he may deem expedient, at•the expense of the owner of such private facilities as aforesaid. No notice is necessary in cases of imminent danger to the public health and safety. B. Said broken, obstructed, out -of- order, or otherwise inoperative sewers, pipes, or on -site sewage disposal systems are declared public nuisances which may be summarily abated at the sole expense of the premises owner and /or responsible persons, notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter. 8.03.3140 Non - Standard Strength Sewage - Special Arrangements. A. Non- standard strength sewage shall be made to conform to standard strength sewage, consistent with the requirements of this chapter prior to discharge into the POTW, at the generator or source's sole expense and liability. B. The Director may, however, by special agreement or arrangement, accept Non - Standard Strength Sewage, subject to additional charges and terms as the Director deems appropriate. 8.03.3160 Duty Imposed -Who is Responsible. A. Whenever this chapter imposes a duty on any identified person, party, or permit holder, said duty or obligation is imposed on said person, party or permit holder's successors in interest, in addition, but not by way of limitation. B. When this chapter imposes a duty or prohibition upon a customer, user, or other responsible party, said duty or prohibition applies in addition, and not by way of limitation, upon the owner of the realty upon which the wastewater source is located and upon all executive officers, managing agents and other persons in charge of the industrial or other facility generating the discharge. 8.03.3180 Unlawful Disposal of Sewage. A. Except as authorized by this chapter, no person may dispose of sewage, water carried wastes or polluted waters. B. Sanitary sewage shall be disposed of only into a sanitary or combined sewer, with proper payment of all fees or charges therefore, or to an authorized on -site sewage disposal system. C. Industrial process wastewater and non- contact cooling water shall be disposed of only into a sanitary or combined sewer, or other sewer or place approved by the Director, with proper payment of all fees or charges therefore. [Cross Reference: 8.03.9160] Draft - 3/22/96 Page 25 sewer. 8.03.3200 Prohibited Uses of Sanitary Sewer. A. No person may discharge or cause to be discharged any storm sewage or storm water into a sanitary sewer. [Cross Reference: 8.03.9160] B. It shall be unlawful to pump out sewage containers into a sanitary 8.03.3220 Use of Storm Sewers- Combined Sewers - Natural Outlets. Except as hereafter provided, no person may discharge or cause to be discharged any wastewater, except storm waters, into a storm sewer. Additionally, notwithstanding the foregoing, non - contact cooling water or other wastewater (some unpolluted industrial process wastewaters) may be discharged upon approval of the Director and the Washington State Department of Ecology to a storm sewer, combined sewer, or natural outlet. Any such discharges shall not cross over a public walk or way. [Cross Reference: 8.03.9160] 8.03.3240 Prohibited Uses - Public Sewers. Absolute prohibited uses of a public sewer are set forth in 8.03.4040 and 8.03.4060. In addition to these requirements, no person shall, directly or indirectly discharge or suffer or permit a discharge into any public sewer any of the following without previous written authorization from the Director and payment of all required fees and charges therefore: 1. The contents of any tank or container owned or used by any person in the business of pumping, collecting, transporting or receiving sewage, effluent, septage, or other waste substances unless said person has obtained prior testing and written consent, as required by the Director, and paid all fees assessed for such discharge; or 2. Any non - standard strength sewage. [Cross References: 8.03.1450, 8.03.9160] 8.03.3260 Obstructing Sewer Prohibited. No person may deposit any garbage, rubbish, dead animal or any substance having a tendency to obstruct the flow of the sewer, in any sewer, access portal, manhole, lamphole, flush tank or sewer opening. [Cross Reference: 8.03.9160] 8.03.3280 Breaking Structures - Appurtenance Prohibited. No person may break, damage, destroy, uncover, deface or tamper with any structure, appurtenance or equipment which is part of the POTW, including, but not limited to, any portal, manhole, lamphole, catch basin, pump station, power source, supporting structures or substrate, or any part whatsoever of a public sewer. [Cross Reference: 8.03.9160] 8.03.3300 Unauthorized Connection to Public Sewers. No unauthorized person may uncover, make any connection with, open into, use, alter, damage, or disturb any public sewer or appurtenance thereof without Draft - 3/22/96 Page 26 first obtaining written permission from the Director, obtaining permits as required by this chapter, and paying fees therefor. (Cross Reference: 8.03.9160] ARTICLE 4000 - PRETREATMENT Part One General Pretreatment Provisions 8.03.4020 Objectives - Application A. This chapter establishes a wastewater pretreatment regulatory program for Spokane County, consisting of requirements for POTW users and enables the County and the City of Spokane to comply with State and Federal laws, including the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1251 et seq.) and the General Pretreatment Regulations (40 CFR Part 403). The objectives of this chapter are to: 1. Prevent the introduction of pollutants into the POTW that will interfere with the operation of the POTW; 2. Prevent the introduction of pollutants into the POTW which will pass - through the POTW, inadequately treated, into receiving waters or otherwise be incompatible with the POTW; 3. Ensure that the quality of the POTW sludge is maintained at a level which allows its use and disposal in compliance with applicable statutes and regulations; 4. Protect POTW personnel who may be affected by wastewater and sludge in the course of their employment and to protect the general public; 5. Improve the opportunity to recycle and reclaim wastewater and sludge from the POTW; 6. Provide for fees for the equitable distribution of the cost of operation, maintenance, and improvement of the POTW; and 7. Enable the City of Spokane to comply with its NPDES permit conditions, sludge use and disposal requirements, and any other Federal or State laws to which the POTW is subject. B. This chapter applies to all persons, customers or POTW users, including Federal, State or local governmental entities or agencies. It provides for the issuance of Wastewater Discharge Permits; authorizes monitoring, compliance, and enforcement activities; establishes administrative review procedures; requires user reporting; and provides for the setting of fees for the equitable distribution of costs resulting from the program established herein. 8.03.4040 Prohibited Discharge Standards - General Prohibitions. No person shall introduce or cause to be introduced into the POTW any substance which: - Draft - 3/22/96 Page 27 1. Causes pass- through or interference; 2. Interferes with, inhibits or disrupts safe and efficient functions of the POTW, including its treatment process and operational safety; 3. Adversely affects the POTW's physical, biological, chemical or radiological status; 4. Is a cause of any violation of the City of Spokane's NPDES permit limitations; 5. Prevents or interferes with a County or City of Spokane selected sludge use or disposal program; 6. Consists of or contains dangerous wastes, as defined in 173 -303 WAC, unless excluded pursuant to 173 - 303- 071(3)(a) WAC; or 7. Creates, proximately causes or poses a risk of any adverse impact upon the environment or upon human health or safety. [Cross Reference: 8.03.3240] 8.03.4060 Prohibited Discharge Standards- Specific Prohibitions. No person shall introduce or cause to be introduced into the POTW the following: 1. Any substance which alone or by interaction with another substance, causes or tends to cause a fire, explosion, or physical or chemical injury to the POTW, plant operations or processes or plant personnel. Prohibited substances shall include, but are not limited to, wastestreams with a closed cup flash point of less than 140 degrees Fahrenheit or 60 degrees Centigrade using the test methods specified in 40 CFR 261.21. Such substances shall further include, but not be limited to: a. b. c. d. e f g h i k 1 m n 0 p H r Department of hazard to the Draft - 3/22/96 Alcohol, Aldehyde, Benzene, Bromate, . Carbide, • Chlorate, . Ether, . gasoline Hydride, • kerosene, . Ketone, . Naphtha, . Perchlorate, . Peroxide, . Sulfide, . Toluene, . Xylene, or . any other substance which the County, the Washington State Ecology, or the EPA has notified the user is a fire hazard or POTW; Page 28 2. Any substance having corrosive properties capable of causing damage or hazard to structures, equipment, or personnel of the POTW, but in no case wastewater with a pH lower than 5.0 or greater than 10.0; 3. Substances not adequately shredded or treated sufficiently to allow easy passage of wastewater flows through a public sewer; 4. Any substance, including oxygen demanding materials (BOD, etc.), released in wastewater at a flow rate and /or concentration which will cause interference with the POTW; 5. wastewater heated to a level which will inhibit biological activity in the POTW resulting in interference, but in no case, wastewater which causes or creates a temperature at the point of entry at the POTW Treatment Plant exceeding 40 degrees Celsius (104 degrees Fahrenheit); 6. Petroleum oil, non - biodegradable cutting oil, or products of mineral oil origin in amounts that will cause interference or pass- through; 7. Substances which cause, create or result in the presence of toxic gases, vapors, or fumes within the POTW presenting immediate risk to County or City of Spokane personnel health and safety; 8. Any trucked or hauled substances, except at discharge points designated by the POTW; 9. Substances which exceed the local limits, as provided in 8.03.416, or would be designated as "Dangerous Waste" under 173 -303 WAC, Washington State Dangerous Waste Regulations; 10. Any substance which, because of a solid or viscous character, amount, or other reasons, may cause or contribute to obstruction of wastewater flows at any point in the POTW or result in interference; 11.Any toxic, noxious or malodorous substance in sufficient quantity to create a public nuisance or health hazard, or render the operation, maintenance or repair of any part of the POTW hazardous or unsafe; 12.Any substance causing the POTW effluent, sludge or by- product to be unsuitable for safe and lawful environmental release, disposal, recycling, reclamation or other use, or which would make such release, disposal, recycling, reclamation or other use more difficult or costly; 13.Any substance which imparts color to the POTW effluent under the following test: a. Color, as a factor of turbidity, shall not cause the POTW effluent to reduce the depth of the compensation point for photosynthetic activity by more than 10 percent of the seasonably established norm for aquatic life; or b. So to cause a violation of the City's NPDES permit; 14.Slugload; Draft - 3/22/96 Page 29 15.Wastewater containing any radioactive wastes or isotopes of such half -life or concentration as may exceed limits established by the Director in compliance with applicable Federal, State, or other governmental agency regulations; 16.Pollutants above either concentration or mass loading limits established by Federal or State standards; or 17 Other substances, including unpolluted water and non - contact cooling water, as may be determined by the Director in the exercise of reasonable discretion, in consideration of the objectives of the Pretreatment Program. 18. The Director shall have the authority to specify by regulation or order specific Local Limits consistent with or more stringent than 40 CFR 403.5(c) and (d). [Cross Reference: 8.03.3240] 8.03.4080 Prohibited Discharge Standards- Prevention -To Whom Apply. A. Prevention. Pollutants, substances or wastewater prohibited under 8.03.404 and 8.03.406 shall not be processed, stored or accumulated to create a discharge or risk of discharge into the POTW. B. Application. Sections 8.03.4040 and 8.03.4060 apply to all persons, regardless of whether they are also subject to categorical pretreatment standards or any other Federal, State or local pretreatment standards or requirements. 8.03.4100 Prohibited Discharge Standards - Affirmative Defenses. A user shall have an affirmative defense in any action brought against it alleging a violation of the Prohibited Discharges in 8.03.4040 and 8.03.4060 subparagraphs 3 through 7 where the user can demonstrate that it did not know or have reason to know that its discharge, alone or in conjunction with a discharge or discharges from other sources, would cause pass- through or interference; and 1. A local limit designed to prevent pass- through and /or interference, as the case may be, was developed in accordance with 40 CFR 403.5.0 for each pollutant in the user's discharge that caused pass - through or interference, and the user was in compliance with each such local limit directly prior to and during the pass- through or interference; or 2. If a local limit designed to prevent pass- through and /or interference, as the case may be, has not been developed in accordance with 40 CFR 403.5.0 of the pollutant(s) that caused the pass- through or interference, the user's discharge directly prior to and during the pass- through or interference did not change substantially in nature or constituents from the user's prior discharge activity when the POTW was regularly in compliance with the POTW's NPDES permit requirements and, in the case of interference, applicable requirements for sewage sludge use or disposal. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 30 8.03.4120 Categorical Pretreatment Standards. A. The categorical pretreatment standards found at 40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N, Parts 405 -471 are adopted and incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth, as now or hereafter amended or revised. These standards specify limitations of quantities or concentrations of substances (pollutants) or substance (pollutant) properties which may be released into the POTW by new or existing sources in specific industrial categories listed in this chapter, 40 CFR 403.6 and 40 CFR chapter I, subchapter N. B. When a categorical pretreatment standard is expressed only in terms of either the mass or the concentration of a pollutant in wastewater, the Director may impose equivalent concentration or mass limits in accordance with 40 CFR 403.6(c). C. When wastewater subject to a categorical pretreatment standard is mixed with wastewater not subject to the same standard, the Director may impose an alternate limit using the combined wastestream formula in 40 CFR 403.6(e). D. A user may obtain a variance from a Categorical Pretreatment Standard if the user shows, in accordance with procedural and substantive provisions of 40 CFR 403.13, and considering the objectives of the County's Pretreatment Program and any evidence presented, that factors relating to the particular user's discharge are fundamentally different from factors considered by the EPA in developing that particular Categorical Pretreatment Standard. Such requests must be directed to the Washington State Department of Ecology, Water Quality Program Director, and granted consistent with 40 CFR 403.13(g). E. A user may obtain a net gross adjustment to a categorical pretreatment standard in accordance with 40 CFR 403.15. F. No user may increase the use of potable water or process water in any way, or mix separate waste streams, for the purpose of diluting a discharge as a partial or complete substitute for adequate treatment to achieve compliance with the applicable pretreatment standards. [Cross Reference: 8.03.1590] G. The Director may impose mass limitations on users using dilution to meet pretreatment standards and in other appropriate cases. [Cross Reference: 8.03.1150] 8.03.4140 Applicable Pretreatment Standards Violations -Upset Affirmative Defense. A. Effect of an Upset. An upset shall constitute an affirmative defense to an action brought for non - compliance with applicable pretreatment standards if the user can demonstrate, through proper documentation such as signed and verified contemporaneous operating logs or other reliable evidence that: 1. An upset occurred and its cause can be identified; 2. At the time of the upset, the user's facility was operated in a prudent and workmanlike manner and in compliance with applicable operation and maintenance procedures; and Draft - 3/22/96 Page 31 3. Within 24 hours of becoming aware of the upset, the user orally advised the POTW, with a written report of the event within five (5) days, as follows: compliance; a. Provides a description of the discharge and cause of non- b. States the period of non - compliance, including exact dates and times or, if not corrected, the anticipated time the non - compliance is expected to continue; and c. Describes the steps being taken or planned to reduce, eliminate and prevent a recurrence of the non - compliance. B. Burden of proof. In any enforcement proceeding, the party seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset shall have the burden of proof. C. Limitations on review of Director's decision on a claim of upset. In the exercise of sound discretion, the Director reviews any claims that non- compliance was caused by an upset. No Director decision made in the course of the review shall constitute a final action subject to any further appeal or review. Further review or appeal from an adverse Director decision of a claim of upset may occur only in an enforcement action brought for non - compliance with applicable pretreatment standards. D. User responsibility in case of upset. The user shall control production or all discharges to the extent necessary to maintain compliance with applicable pretreatment standards upon reduction, loss or failure to its treatment facility until the facility is restored or an alternative method of treatment is provided. This requirement applies in the situation where, among other things, the primary source of power of the treatment facility is reduced, lost or fails. [Source: 40 CFR 403.16; 46 CFR 9439, January 28, 1981, as amended at 53 CFR 40615, Oct. 17, 1988] 8.03.4160 Local Limits. A. No person shall cause any discharge into the POTW in excess of the local limits set forth in paragraph B of this section. Said limits are expressed as concentrations, or may be set by the Director in equivalent mass limits. Said limits shall be measured at the end of the pretreatment facility pipe, or, if no such sampling location, prior to mixing with other process wastewater or non - contact cooling water, apply unless prior written approval of the Director has been obtained. B. Local limits are: Material rnnrentratinn (mg /r,) Arsenic 0.94 Cadmium 0.11 Chromium 5.0 Copper 1.4 Cyanide 0.49 Lead 0.32 Mercury 0.2 Draft - 3/22/96 Page 32 Nickel 3.98 Silver 0.43 Zinc 7.47 Fats, Oil or Grease 100.00 (Includes Petroleum, Animal and Vegetable Fats, and Greases) C. Consistent with the purposes of the Wastewater Pretreatment Program and in the interest of public-health, safety and welfare, the Director may adopt additional local limits or specific prohibitions on pollutants developed by the Director and consistent with 40 CFR 403.5(c) by regulation. Such limits or prohibitions are pretreatment standards for purposes of section 307(d) of the Act. D. Instantaneous limits may be established for all users, groups or specific users. They may be designed to ameliorate temporary or permanent discharge characteristics, or to accommodate any new or special temporary or permanent condition of the POTW, its effluent receiving water, or other environmental problem. For purposes of this section, instantaneous limit shall mean the maximum concentration or loading of a pollutant discharged at one time, as determined from the analysis or any discrete or composite sample collected, independent of the industrial flow rate. [Cross Reference: 8.03.4060 -7] 8.03.4180 Level of Compliance Effort; Unreasonable Burden Every user shall use all known, available and reasonable methods of treatment and prevention to achieve compliance with the County's Wastewater Pretreatment Program contained in this chapter. In specific instances, upon a showing of unreasonable burden or hardship, the Director may limit, relax, condition discharge requirements, or impose temporary measures, to accommodate reasonable efforts to develop a full compliance effort, consistent with the purpose of the program and in the exercise of sound discretion. The Director does not waive Federal or State standards, such waivers are subject to approval by the Washington State Department of Ecology. Nothing herein shall extend the compliance deadlines provided in 8.03.4310. 8.03.4200 Construction of Pretreatment Facilities. A. Users shall construct all necessary wastewater pretreatment facilities to meet the requirements of this chapter, and shall maintain the same in satisfactory operation, all at the user's sole expense and liability. B. Prior to commencing construction, a user must submit to the Director sufficiently detailed construction plans for the pretreatment facilities and receive approval. Prior to commencing operations, the user must submit operation and maintenance plans and procedures for the Director's approval. Any subsequent proposal for modification, repair or change of the pretreatment facilities, or methods of operation or maintenance, are further subject to approval by the Director. No approval granted shall excuse a user from full responsibility to comply with the requirements of this chapter. C. In addition to approvals referenced above, pretreatment facilities are subject to the permit, inspection and other building and construction Draft - 3/22/96 Page 33 requirements of SCC Title 11 and to the requirements of 173 -240 WAC and section 173- 216 -110 WAC. D. For construction requiring Washington State Department of Ecology approval, all plans, specifications and other pertinent information relating to proposed preliminary treatment facilities shall be submitted to the Director and to the Department of Ecology for approval. No construction of such facilities shall be commenced until such approvals are obtained in writing, fees paid and approval conditions met. (Cross Reference: 8.04.460 C] 8.03.4220 Side Sewer Manhole. When required by the Director, the owner of any property served by a side sewer carrying industrial wastewater shall, within 90 days of notification, install a suitable manhole or access portal in the side sewer to facilitate observation, sampling and measuring the wastes. Such portal or manhole, when necessary, shall be accessibly and safely located and shall be constructed in accordance with plans approved by the Director. The portal or manhole shall be installed by the owner at his /her sole expense and liability and shall be maintained by the owner so as to be safe and accessible at all times. 8.03.4240 Self Monitoring - County Inspections. A. In order to insure continued compliance with this chapter, the Director may require any user or customer to submit information on the nature and characteristics of its wastewater or any other information requested by the Director within 10 days of the request. The Director may prepare a form for this purpose and may require periodic updates. B. Where deemed necessary to assure compliance with this chapter, the Director may further require any user or customer to install sampling and monitoring equipment as necessary and maintain the same at all times in a safe and proper operating condition by the user or customer at its own expense. All devices used to measure wastewater flow and quality shall be calibrated to manufacturer's specifications to ensure their accuracy. C. The Director is authorized to conduct inspections or take samples deemed necessary to enforce this chapter. Where a user or customer has security measures in force which require proper identification and clearance before entry into its premises, the user or customer shall make necessary arrangements so that, upon presentation of suitable identification, the County staff will be permitted to enter without delay for the purposes of enforcement or inspections required by this chapter or the Director. D. Users or customers shall permit County inspectors or officials, without delay, hindrance or interference: 1. To inspect any facilities and sewage, and set up on the user's property, or require installation of such devices as are necessary to conduct sampling and /or metering of the user's /customer's operations. 2. To require a permittee to produce documents and business records for inspection and copying upon the Director's request; and Draft - 3/22/96 Page 34 3. To take samples of discharge. E. All users must cooperate fully with the Director in his /her efforts to test, monitor, inspect and otherwise enforce this chapter. Required cooperation includes granting prompt entry access to any premises or facility containing a discharge source, treatment system, monitoring or testing facility, or relevant records. F. No person may alter, tamper with, change, remove, damage or otherwise interfere with any discharge monitoring device or test, or alter, falsify, conceal or change any data or information acquired therefrom. [Cross Reference: 8.03.9180] 8.03.4260 Sampling and Analysis. A. A minimum of four (4) grab samples must be used for pH, cyanide, total phenols, oil and . grease, sulfide, and volatile organics. For all other pollutants, twenty -four hour flow proportional composite samples must be obtained through flow - proportional composite sampling techniques where feasible. The Director may waive flow- proportional composite sampling for any user that demonstrates that flow - proportional is infeasible. In such cases, samples may be obtained through time - proportional composite sampling techniques or through a minimum of four (4) grab samples where the user demonstrates that this will provide a representative sample of the effluent being discharged. B. Samples should be taken immediately downstream from the pretreatment facilities if such exist, or immediately downstream from the regulated or manufacturing process if no pretreatment exists, or as determined by the Director and contained in the user's permit. For users subject to categorical standards, if other wastewater is mixed with the regulated wastewater prior to pretreatment the user should measure the flows and concentrations necessary to allow use of the Combined Wastestream Formula of 40 CFR 403.6(e) in order to evaluate compliance with the applicable pretreatment standards. C. All measurements, tests and analyses of the characteristics of waters and wastes to which reference is made in this chapter shall be determined, as appropriate or required by the Director, by an environmental laboratory accredited by the Washington State Department of Ecology (173 -50 WAC) , and in accordance with the current edition of "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater ", a publication of the American Public Health Association, Inc., and /or current EPA approved procedures (40 CFR Part 136) , and shall be taken at the control access portal or manhole provided for in 8.03.422, or based upon suitable samples taken at said control manhole. In the event that no special access portal or manhole has been required, the control portal or manhole shall be considered to be the nearest downstream portal or manhole in the public sewer from the point at which the structure is connected. D. All sample results submitted by or on behalf of a user or customer shall indicate the time, date and place of sampling, methods of analysis, and shall certify that such sampling and analysis is representative of normal work cycles and expected pollutant discharges from the user. If a user sampled more frequently than what was required in its permit, using the methodology specified in 40 CFR 136, it shall submit all results of sampling and analysis of the discharge as part of its self- monitoring report The Director will Draft - 3/22/96 Page 35 follow the same procedures as outlined in paragraphs A through D of this section. Part Two: Wastewater Discharge Permit 8.03.4280 Wastewater Discharge Permit Required. A. In addition to any permit that may be required for the construction of pretreatment facilities, there is required a Wastewater Discharge Permit for every significant industrial user (SIU), as further provided in this chapter. Permits are issued to a named person at a specified location, granting the privilege of discharge of SIU wastewater into the POTW. No SIU shall discharge wastewater into the POTW without first obtaining a Wastewater Discharge Permit from the Director. B. A permit hereunder confers no property or other vested rights and does not excuse compliance with this chapter. Obtaining a Wastewater Discharge Permit does not relieve a permittee of its obligation to comply with all Federal and State pretreatment standards or requirements or with any other requirements of Federal, State, and local law 8.03.4300 Times to Apply -New Permits, Renewals A. Existing users or existing sources must apply for a Wastewater Discharge Permit within 30 days of the effective date of this ordinance. In addition, the Director may require any person identified by the Director as appearing to meet the definition of a significant industrial user to show cause why such person should not apply for a Wastewater Discharge Permit. Thereafter, such person must apply for a permit within 30 days of being notified to apply by the Director. B. New Users and New Sources. Not later than 90 days prior to the planned or actual commencement of discharge, new sources and new users shall apply for a permit and will be required to submit to the Director the items listed in subparagraphs 1 through 5 of 8.03.4320. C. Following application deadlines set forth in paragraphs A and B of this section, no user may commence or continue discharge without first receiving a permit from the Director. Such users shall also be required to include in their report information on the method of pretreatment they intend to use to meet applicable pretreatment standards. Such users shall give estimates of the information requested in subparagraphs 5 and 6 of 8.03.4320. The Director will establish the schedule for completion of all required permit information as necessary. D. Upon finding that a user otherwise meeting the criteria of significant industrial user has no reasonable potential for adversely affecting the POTW's operation or for violating any pretreatment standard or requirement, the Director may at any time on his /her own initiative or in response to a petition received from a user, and in accordance with this chapter and 40 CFR 403.8(f) (6), determine that such user is not a significant industrial user. E. Permit renewal applications must be submitted, in like form as an original application except as modified by the Director, 180 days prior to Draft - 3/22/96 Page 36 expiration of an existing permit. Renewal applications shall be signed and certified as provided in 8.03.436. Incomplete, inaccurate or unsigned renewal applications are returned by the Director. The Director may permit an administrative extension of an existing, expiring permit, pending review of a timely renewal application, except to the extent the delay is caused by lack of cooperation by an applicant or other factors within an applicant's control. F. This section is also subject to the compliance deadlines set forth in 8.03.4310. .8.03.4310 Compliance Deadlines The following compliance deadlines apply to this chapter: 1. Categorical Users: a. Existing sources must comply with the requirements of this chapter respecting categorical standards and any other applicable pretreatment standards no later than three (3) years from the effective date of the standard, unless a shorter compliance time is specified in the appropriate subpart of 40 CFR chapter I, subchapter N. b. New sources must comply with the requirements of this chapter upon enactment. Where new categorical standards are promulgated by the EPA hereafter, new sources are bound by such standards and compliance is required as of the date of promulgation. [Source: 40 CFR 403.6(b)] 2. Non - Categorical Users: a. Existing users must comply with the requirements of this chapter respecting applicable pretreatment standards other than categorical standards no later than 180 calendar days from the effective date of the standard, unless a shorter compliance time is specified by the adopting authority; provided, the Director may order a shorter period for local limits or any other applicable standard. b. New users must comply with the requirements of this chapter upon enactment. Where new standards are promulgated hereafter, new sources are bound by such standards and compliance is required as of the date of promulgation. 3. Users who are both categorical and non - categorical users must comply with the most stringent applicable deadlines set forth herein. 8.03.4320 Contents of Application. An application required under 8.03.4300 is also intended to fulfill the requirements of 40 CFR 403.12(b). The application shall include: 1. Fee. The permit fee in accordance with Article 9000 of this chapter; Draft - 3/22/96 Page 37 2. General Information. The name, address and facility, operator, owners, authorized representative identifying information requested by the Director. 3. Other Permits. A list of any environmental or for the facility. 4. Description of Operations. a. A description of the nature, average rate of production and Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) of the operation(s) carried out at the facility; and b. A schematic process diagram which indicates points of discharge to the POTW from the regulated or manufacturing processes; 5. Flow Measurement. a. For flows regulated under categorical standards, users must submit information showing the measured average daily and maximum daily flow of industrial process wastewater, in gallons per day, to the POTW. b. Where flows from other sources combine with regulated flow, users must submit information showing such information as determined necessary by the Director to allow use of the Combined Wastestream Formula of 40 CFR 403.6(e). c. For users not within the prior subparagraph must submit information showing the measured average daily industrial process wastewater flow, in gallons per day, to user's total plant flow or individual manufacturing process by the Director. [Cross Reference: 8.03.1270) 6. Pollutant Measurement. telephone number of the of the user and other control permits held by "b ", such persons and maximum daily the POTW from the flow, as required d. The Director may allow for verifiable estimates of these flows where justified by cost or feasibility considerations. a. The user shall identify the applicable pretreatment standards for each regulated process. b. In addition, the user shall submit the results of sampling and analysis identifying the nature and concentration (or mass, where required by the Categorical Pretreatment Standard or by the Director) of regulated pollutants in the discharge from each regulated or manufacturing process. Both daily maximum and average concentration (or mass, where required) shall be reported. The sample shall be representative of daily operations and shall conform to sampling and analytical procedures outlined in 8.03.4260 and any related provisions. c. The user shall take a minimum of one representative sample to compile that data necessary to comply with the requirements of this section. More sampling may be required by the Director where deemed necessary. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 38 d. For Categorical Users, where an alternate concentration or mass limit has been calculated in accordance with 40 CFR 403.6(e) adjusted limit along with supporting data shall be submitted as part of the application. For users not subject to Categorical Standards, where the Director develops alternate concentration or mass limits because of dilution, this adjusted limit, along with supporting data, must be submitted as part of the application. 7. Certification. A statement, signed by an authorized representative of the user in accordance with 8.03.4360 and certified by a qualified professional, indicating whether pretreatment standards are being met on a consistent basis, and, if not, whether additional operation and maintenance (O&M) and /or additional pretreatment is required for the user to meet the applicable pretreatment standards and requirements. a. Where the user's categorical pretreatment standard has been modified by a removal allowance (40 CFR 403.7), the Combined Wastestream Formula (40 CFR 403.6(e)), and /or a fundamentally different factors variance (40 CFR 403.13) at the time the user submits the report required by this section, the information required by subparagraphs 6 and 7 of" this section shall pertain to the modified limits. b. If the Categorical Pretreatment Standard is modified by a removal allowance (40 CFR 403.7), the Combined Wastestream Formula (40 CFR 403.6)(e)), and /or a fundamentally different factors variance (40 CFR 403.13) after the user submits the report required by subparagraphs 6 and 7 of this section shall be submitted by the user within 60 days after the modified limit is approved; 8. Compliance Schedule. If additional pretreatment and /or O&M will be required to meet the applicable pretreatment standards, the application will reflect the schedule by which the user will provide such additional pretreatment and /or 0&M. The completion date in this schedule shall not be later than the compliance date established for the applicable categorical pretreatment standard. [Cross Reference: 8.03.4600] actual); Draft - 3/22/96 9. Additional Information: a. Description of activities, facilities and plant processes on the premises including a list of all raw materials, chemicals or supplies used, received or stored on site which are or may be discharged to the POW, whether accidentally or intentionally; b. Number and types of employees, hours of operations (proposed or c. Each product produced by the facility, type, amount, process or processes and rate of production; d. Type and amount of raw materials, including chemicals, utilized, disclosed in average and maximum daily amounts; e. Disclosure of site plans, floor plans, mechanical and plumbing plans and details to show all sewers, sewer connections, inspection manholes, Page 39 sampling chambers and appurtenances by size, location and elevation. For each sewer, an inspection and sampling manhole or other structure with an opening of not less than 24 inches in diameter and an internal diameter of not less than 36 inches, containing flow measuring, recording and sampling equipment, shall also be shown as required by the Director; f. Disclosure of time and duration of discharges; g. An indication whether pretreatment facilities are necessary to comply with the Wastewater Pretreatment Program; and h. Such other information as may be requested by the Director; and 10.Acknowledgment. An acknowledgment that the applicant is familiar with the pretreatment standards and requirements applicable to its discharges and possible discharges and a showing that it has developed monitoring and pretreatment programs satisfactory to assure compliance with the best practical available technology; 11.Incomplete or inaccurate applications or applications not signed by an authorized representative of the user will be returned and do not comprise compliance with this chapter. 8.03.4340 Confidentiality. A. A person submitting or allowing the examination of data required by the Director in the performance of the regulatory purposes of the County's Wastewater Pretreatment Program may, by written request contemporaneous with the disclosure, stating in specific detail the data sought to be protected and the basis of the claim of confidentiality, request the Director to keep in confidence information given under the program. B. The person must segregate from other information the data sought to be protected at the time of submittal. C. Requests for confidentiality may relate to trade secrets or similar commercially valuable information. Approval of confidentiality shall be subject to any applicable laws requiring the disclosure of public records information, and shall further not apply to requests by other governmental agencies for purposes relating to the NPDES or pretreatment programs or in any enforcement proceedings relating to this chapter. Wastewater constituents, characteristics, or other "effluent data" as defined in 40 CFR 2.302 may not be granted confidentiality protection. D. In ruling on confidentiality requests, the Director, with the advice of the Prosecuting Attorney, may consider the practices of Federal and State agencies and the purposes of the program. A determination of confidentiality may be revoked upon reasonable notice to the person who submitted the confidential data. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 40 8.03.4360 Signing the Permit Application- Reports, Other All applications, reports or other documents submitted in connection with this chapter shall be signed by an authorized representative of the user and include substantially the following certification: Draft - 3/22/96 • I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared by me or under my direction or supervision. I certify that I have made a diligent inquiry and review of the contents of all submittals, and that the contents are true, accurate and complete, based upon reliable information gathering procedures by trained and qualified personnel. I make this certification individually and as an authorized representative of the user. I further certify that I am familiar with the requirements of Spokane County's Wastewater Pretreatment Program, as reflected in SCC (Spokane County Code) Chapter 8.03, and particularly Article 400 thereof and understand the user, and myself personally, are subject to significant penalties for false, inaccurate or incomplete submittals under applicable laws, including fines and the possibility of imprisonment. I understand my personal responsibility to supplement promptly any submittal with updated and additional information as soon as it is known or, in the exercise of reasonable care, should be known. . 8.03.4380 Decision on Permit Application. Within 30 days of receipt of a properly completed permit application, including any additional information requested, the Director will determine whether the permit shall be issued and will notify the applicant. Upon a determination to issue the permit, public notice shall be given by publishing the same in the official newspaper of Spokane County for two (2) weeks, with a public comment period of 30 calendar days commencing with the date of first publication. No permit shall be final until the evaluation and review of any public comment(s) submitted, including any response thereto by the applicant. Unless the Director determines a need exists for additional time, permit comments shall be reviewed and any permit shall become final or other action taken thereon within 30 days after the last date to receive public comment. 8.03.4400 Permit Terms Required. The Director will determine the permit terms, consistent with this chapter. A permit shall include the following terms: 1. Duration (in no case more than five (5) years); 2. Statement of non - transferability without prior notice and approval, in accord with this chapter, with a copy of the existing Wastewater Discharge Permit to the new owner or operator; 3. Effluent limits based on applicable general pretreatment standards in 40 CFR part 403 and this Article, categorical pretreatment standards, local limits, and any other State and local laws or regulations; Page 41 4. Self- monitoring, sampling, reporting, notification and record keeping requirements, including an identification of the pollutants or substances to be monitored, sampling locations, sampling frequency and sample type, based on the applicable general pretreatment standards in 40 CFR part 403 and this Article, categorical pretreatment standards, local limits, and State and local laws and regulations, but no permit omission shall excuse compliance with this chapter; 5. A statement of applicable civil and criminal penalties for violation of pretreatment standards and requirements, and any applicable compliance schedule. Such schedules may not extend the compliance date beyond applicable Federal deadlines; and 6. A statement of the possibility for permit modifications or revisions because of changing requirements in this chapter, the needs of the POTW, the public health and safety, to incorporate specific orders or an EPA promulgation of new Federal pretreatment standards, additional state requirements or other reasonable basis. 8.03.4420 Permittee Obligations. The following requirements apply to all persons required to apply for Wastewater Discharge Permits, applicants, and permittee, and are requirements of the issuance and continued validity of all permits: 1. Compliance with all provisions of this chapter, including applicable pretreatment standards and requirements, any regulations or orders issued pursuant to this chapter and any specifically stated permit conditions; 2. Submission of true, accurate and complete application and reporting information and prompt addendum or update for any information changes; 3. The regulated party obtaining all other permits and approvals required by law- and 4. No discharges shall contain any new or increased pollutants or change the nature of pollutants when such discharge would not meet the applicable pretreatment standards, or cause the POTW to violate its NPDES requirements. 8.03.4440 Slugload- Accidental Discharge Control Plan. A. Every two (2) years or sooner, significant industrial users shall be evaluated as to the need for a plan to address slugload problems. The results of such activities shall be available to the approval authority upon request. B. When required, Slugload Control Plans shall include: 1. A description of discharge practices, including non - routine batch discharges; 2. A description of stored chemicals; Draft - 3/22/96 Page 42 3. Procedures for immediately notifying the POTW of slug discharges, including any discharge that would violate a prohibition under 40 CFR 403.5(b) or this chapter, with procedures for follow -up written notification within five days; 4. Where required by the Director, procedures to prevent adverse impact from accidental spills, including inspection and maintenance of "storage areas, handling and transfer of materials, loading and unloading operations, control of plant site run -off, worker training, building of containment structures or equipment, measures for containing pollutants (including solvents), and /or measures and equipment for emergency response [Source: 40 CFR 403.8(f) (2) (v) ] ; and 5. A review of any requirements or suggestions from the Washington State Department of Ecology. 8.03.4460 Permit Performance Security. When deemed necessary in the exercise of reasonable discretion, the Director may issue orders or develop regulations regarding the posting of surety or other bonds to insure full performance of all permit requirements to enhance and assure enforcement capability, either for a specific applicant or class, or in general. If a bond is required, its renewal may be a condition of continued validity of a permit. 8.04.4480 Permit Transfer. A. Permit holders shall submit requests for transfer of permit privileges and duties in writing to the Director. Such a request shall reflect: transfer; 1. The permittee's and transferee's full name and address; 2. The reason for the transfer request and a proposed date for the 3. A statement that the transferee is fully familiar with permit conditions and facility operations, and understands and accepts the obligation for full permit compliance, and that no requests for permit modifications are planned or reasonably foreseeable. Any request for permit modification is handled under 8.03.4500; and - • 4. The transfer request shall be signed and certified as provided in 8.03.4360 by an authorized representative of the permittee and proposed transferee. B. Requests, including any additional information required by the Director, shall be submitted no later than 30 days prior to the proposed effective date, unless otherwise approved in writing by the Director. C. Failure to obtain approval prior to transfer renders any permit automatically void as of the date of the facility transfer. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 43 8.03.4500 Permit Modification. For good cause, the Director may modify a permit. Good cause shall include: 1. To incorporate new or otherwise determined applicable Federal, State or local requirements not included in the permit, including revisions of or a grant of variance from categorical pretreatment standards pursuant to 40 CFR 403.13; 2. Where deemed necessary by the Director because of changes in the user's operating processes, wastewater volume or character since the time of issuance of the permit. 3. Where deemed necessary by the Director because of changes in the POTW related to the need for temporary or permanent reduction or elimination of permitted discharges; 4. Where deemed necessary by the Director because of safety or efficiency of operations of the POTW, safety of the receiving waters, other environmental concerns, or safety of County or City of Spokane personnel; 5. To address violations of a permit or because of misrepresentations or misunderstandings about information supplied or not included in the Director's permit file; 6. Because of typographical or clerical errors; or 7. Upon application, because of a transfer of ownership of the permittee's facility or other significant permittee business changes since the time of permit issuance, upon a showing of unreasonable burden, as provided in 8.03.4180. No modification may be granted because of transfer unless the permit is transferred in accordance with 8.03.4480. 8.03.4520 Permit Revocation. The Director may revoke a permit for good cause. Good cause shall include, but not be limited to: 1. Violations of the permit or this chapter, including any applicable pretreatment standard, permit condition or order of the Director; 2 the permit permittee, 3 notify the planned or . Misrepresentations, inaccurate, incomplete information or data in application or in any other reports or documents submitted by the or required to be submitted by the Director or this chapter; . Failure to update any information or data previously submitted or Director of changed conditions under 8.03.466 or significant changes experienced in the permittee's wastewater discharge; 4. Falsifying or failing to timely submit self monitoring reports, or tampering with monitoring equipment; Draft - 3/22/96 Page 44 5. Failure to meet effluent limitations, compliance schedules, or other reporting or monitoring requirements; 6. Failure to allow the Director access to records or the premises for inspection or other enforcement purposes; 7. Failure to complete, supplement and timely submit a permit application, transfer or modification request, or commencement of operations for which permit action is requested prior to approval of the same; or 8. Upon issuance of a new permit, granting of a request for transfer or modification, any prior permits issued are automatically revoked and void. 8.04.4540 Appeals. A. Appeals from the Director's decision respecting any permit or application must be submitted in writing, filed with a Hearings Examiner designated by Spokane County, with a copy served on the Director no later than 30 calendar days from the issuance date given by the Director for his /her decision. The appeal shall also be served on the permit applicant if the appealing party is other than the applicant. B. An appeal shall specify: Draft - 3/22/96 1. The identity and interest of the party appealing; 2. The decision or parts of the decision to which the appeal is directed, the reasons for the appeal, including a summary of facts and legal authorities, and any alternatives to the decision desired to be considered; 3. Contain copies of any permit application or permit granted which relate to the subject matter of the appeal or clearly reference all documents or other information to support the appeal; and 4. If the appellant is a permit holder or applicant, be signed and certified as provided in 8.03.4360. C. Untimely, incomplete or unsigned appeals shall be returned by the Hearings Examiner. Upon receipt of a timely, signed appeal, in proper form, the Hearing Examiner shall publish notice of the appeal in the County's official newspaper, with a time and place for a hearing thereon, which shall be no later than 45 days from the date the appeal is received. The Examiner shall proceed to conduct the hearing with such procedures deemed necessary or convenient to the hearing process. D. Upon conclusion of the hearing and submittal of any additional materials requested by the Examiner, a decision on the merits shall be entered within 20 days thereafter. The Examiner may affirm, reverse or modify the Director's decision. The Examiner's decision shall be final. E. Failure to file and serve a timely appeal in proper form waives the right to seek further administrative review, and the applicant shall be deemed to have accepted the Director's decision. Page 45 F. The effectiveness of the Director's decision shall not be stayed or superseded pending further appeals or review of his /her decision unless ordered by the Director, conditioned upon the posting of such security or other actions as the Director may require. Part Three: Wastewater from Other Jurisdictions 8.03.4560 Wastewater From Other Jurisdictions - Interlocal Agreements. A. Acceptance by the City of Spokane's POTW of wastewater conveyed through the County's general sewerage system from locations outside of Spokane County's sewer service area is contingent upon satisfying the requirements of this section. B. Any other governmental entity with jurisdiction over any person, customer or user desiring to discharge or continue discharging wastewater into the POTW through the County's general sewerage system shall enter into an Interlocal Agreement with the County in conformity with chapter 39.34 RCW as the same may apply, which shall include the following information and terms: 1. General constituents and volumes of wastewater discharged; 2. A list of all sewer service customers in the contributing government's territorial jurisdiction, and a promise to maintain and update said list on at least an annual basis, together with any other information requested by the Director; 3. Agreement by the contributing governmental entity to adopt and make all necessary arrangements to administer and enforce within its jurisdictional boundaries, an ordinance, regulation or rule at least as stringent as this chapter with respect to the requirements of this Article, and to update the same to conform to changes in the SCC, all consistent with the County's Pretreatment Program, as now or hereafter implemented; 4. Sets, forth which regulatory responsibilities enunciated in this will be performed by which governmental entity and which will be delegated; 5. Specifies which, if any, administrative and enforcement powers and functions of the Pretreatment Program will be delegated and to which governmental or other entity, as the agent of the contributing governmental or other entity, and pledging to pay all costs of administrative and enforcement functions and powers delegated not otherwise covered by permit fees remitted to the enforcing government; 6. Respecting any such powers or functions reserved by the contributing governmental entity, provides that in the event of any failure or default by said entity in the performance of the reserved functions or powers, the Director, upon 30 days notice or other reasonable time set by the Director, may elect to assume said powers or functions, as the agent of and at the expense of the contributing governmental entity, to the extent permitted by law, or may compel performance of such functions by the contributing governmental entity; Draft - 3/22/96 Page 46 7. Agreement that all permit applications, reports, data, inspections or other documents relating to extraterritorial discharges are accessible by the Director and not protected by any right of confidentiality or privilege; and that the Director has a right of direct access to and inspection of any extraterritorial source of wastewater, including facilities, operations, sampling or monitoring equipment, logs or data, in whatever form; 8. Any desired limits on the constituents or volumes of wastewater originating from the contributing governmental entity; and 9. Remedies for breach. Part Four: Reporting Requirements 8.03.4580 Baseline Monitoring Report. A report with items listed in 8.03.432o subparagraphs 2 through 8 and signed as provided in 8.03.4360 shall be submitted to the Director. 8.03.4600 Compliance Schedules - Progress Reports. A. Compliance schedules for meeting applicable pretreatment standards shall contain increments of progress in the form of dates for the commencement and completion of major events leading to the construction and operation of additional pretreatment required for the user to meet the applicable pretreatment standards. Incremental tasks include hiring an engineer or other personnel, completing preliminary plans, completing final plans, executing contract(s) for major components, commencing construction, and completing construction. No time lapse between incremental tasks shall exceed nine (9) months. B. The user shall submit a progress report no later than 14 calendar days following each date in the schedule and the final date for compliance, to the Director including, at a minimum, whether or not it complied with the increment of progress to be met on such date and, if not, the date on which it expects to comply with this increment of progress, the reason for delay and the steps being taken by the user to return the construction to the established schedule. In no event shall more than nine (9) months elapse between such progress reports. C. New sources shall install and have in operating condition, and shall "start up" all pollution control equipment required to meet applicable pretreatment standards before beginning to discharge. [Cross Reference: 8.03.4200] 8.03.4620 Ninety Day Compliance Report - Applicable Pretreatment Standards. A. A Compliance Report, signed as required in 8.03.4360, shall be submitted to the Director within 90 days following the date for final compliance by a user for applicable pretreatment standards, or in the case of a new source within 90 days following commencement of discharge. The report shall contain those items listed in 8.03.4320, subparagraphs 5 through 8. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 47 B. For users subject to equivalent mass or concentration limits established by the Director in accordance with procedures established in 40 CFR 403.6(c), the Compliance Report shall contain a reasonable measure of the user's long term production rate. For all other users subject to categorical pretreatment standards expressed in terms of allowable pollutant discharge per unit of production (or other measure of operation), the report shall include the user's actual production during the appropriate sampling period. 8.03.4640 Semiannual Continuing Reports. A. All SIUs performing self monitoring must submit a written report to the Director in June and December of each year, unless another biannual schedule is ordered by the Director. The report must specify the content of all user wastewater, based upon current sampling (in a least six month intervals) and as prescribed in the Wastewater Discharge Permit. The report must be signed in accordance with 8.03.4360 except to the extent sampling is through direct County monitoring. B.. Sampling shall be representative of the user's daily operations and shall be taken in accordance with the requirements specified in 8.03.4260. wastewater monitoring and flow measurement facilities shall be properly operated, cleaned and maintained in good working order. Failure to accomplish this is not grounds for a user to deny a sample is representative. User monitoring more frequently than required by the Director shall be included in any report if in accordance with the specifications of 8.03.4260. C. The report shall include a record of concentrations (and mass, if specified in the Wastewater Discharge Permit) of pollutants listed in the permit and a record of all flow measurements (average'. and maximum) taken at the designated sampling locations, and other information required by the Director or this chapter. Production data, as required in the permit, shall also be included. Daily maximum and average concentration (or mass, if required) must be reported. Users sampling more frequently than required, using methods in 40 CFR part 136, shall report the results. D. The Director may require self- monitoring by the user or, if requested by the user, may agree to perform the periodic compliance monitoring needed to prepare the periodic compliance report required under this section at the user's expense. The user shall be billed for any periodic compliance monitoring accomplished by the County. The Director is under no obligation to perform periodic compliance monitoring for a user. 8.03.4660 Changed Conditions Report. A. Each user shall notify the Director of any planned significant changes to the user's operations, system or processes which significantly affect the user's wastewater nature, constituents, quality, characteristics, volumes or storage of chemicals, including the commencement of discharge of any prohibited or limited substance and the addition of any process covered by the national categorical pretreatment standards, occurring since previous information was submitted. For purposes of this requirement, significant changes include, but are not limited to, flow increases of 20 percent volume or greater, either of a pollutant or total volume, or the discharge of any previously unreported pollutant Draft - 3/22/96 Page.48 B. User notification shall be signed in accordance with 8.03.436 and received by the Director at least 30 days before the change. Where a change was unplanned and not reasonably foreseeable, the report shall be filed with the Director within three (3) business days after any change in operations. Such report shall not excuse full compliance with permit conditions. Additionally, users remain responsible to obtain the Director's approval prior to initiating any discharge in violation of an applicable pretreatment standard. C. The Director may require the user to submit any additional information as deemed necessary, including filing an application for a Wastewater Discharge Permit, in whole or part. The Director may determine a user is an SIU, issue a Wastewater Discharge Permit, or modify or revoke an existing permit. D. Any SIU holding a Wastewater Discharge Permit incorporating equivalent mass or concentration limits shall notify the Director within two (2) business days after the permittee has a reasonable basis to know that the production level will significantly change within the next calendar month. Any permittee not providing a notice of such anticipated change will be required to comply with the existing limits contained in its permit. 8.03.4680 Slugload, Upset, Prohibited Discharge Reports and Notices. A. All users are required to provide immediate telephonic notification to the Director upon the occurrence of a slugload, upset or any other prohibited discharge. The notification must include the location, date and time of the discharge, the type of waste, concentration and volume, and indicate corrective actions taken and proposed. Users shall retain a record, for County inspection, of the user caller's identity, time of call and person reached. B. The user shall file a written report with the Director within five (5) days following the discharge: 1. Describing the occurrence, its cause and its impact upon the user's compliance with the Wastewater Pretreatment Program and the Wastewater Discharge Permit; 2. Stating. the duration of the non - compliance in exact dates and times and, if non - compliance is continuing, the expected time of compliance; and 3. Detailing steps which have been and will be taken to correct the violation and prevent a recurrence. C. A timely filed report, with good and complete documentation, signed by an authorized representative of the user and accepted as complete and accurate by the Director, constitutes a defense to a criminal enforcement action brought by the County for violation of this chapter or the Wastewater Discharge Permit against a user, to the extent the violation occurred during the period of upset or other accident. However, submittal of such report does not relieve the persons responsible of any expense, loss, damage or other liability which may be incurred, including liability for damages sustained by the County or third parties. D. Every user shall post and maintain in a prominent place a notice to employees advising them whom to call in the event of a prohibited discharge and Draft - 3/22/96 Page 49 shall ensure that all employees are advised of the emergency notification procedure. 8.03.4700 Sample Violation Report. If sampling performed by an user indicates a violation, the user shall notify the Director within 24 hours of becoming aware of the violation. The user shall also repeat the sampling within five (5) days and submit the results of the repeat analysis to the Director within 30 days after becoming aware of the violation, except that the user is not required to resample if: 1. The Director performs sampling at the user's location at a frequency of at least once per month; or 2. The Director performs sampling at the user's location between the time when the user performs its initial sampling and the time when the user receives the results of this sampling. WAC; 8.03.4720 Dangerous Waste Notification. A. Users discharging dangerous wastes as defined in chapter 173 -303 WAC (listed, characteristic or criteria wastes) are required to provide a one time notification in writing to the Director and the Washington State Department of Ecology, Eastern Region Dangerous Waste Unit. Any user shall comply with the requirements contained herein within 30 days of becoming aware of a discharge of dangerous wastes to the POTW. B. Such notification shall include: 1. The name of the dangerous waste as set forth in chapter 173 -303 2. The dangerous waste number; and 3. The type of discharge (continuous, batch or other). C. If a user discharges more than 100 kilograms of such waste per calendar month or batch to the sewer system, the notification in paragraph B of this section shall also contain the following information to the extent that it is known or readily available to the user: 1. An identification of the hazardous constituents contained in the wastestream; 2. An estimation of the mass and concentration of such constituents in the wastestreams discharged during the calendar month or batch; and 3. An estimation of the mass of constituents in the wastestreams expected to be discharged during the following 12 months. D. These notification requirements do not apply to pollutants already reported under the self - monitoring requirements. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 50 E. Whenever the Washington State Department of Ecology publishes final rules identifying additional dangerous wastes, new characteristics or criteria of dangerous waste, a user shall notify the Director and the Department of Ecology, Eastern Region Dangerous Waste Unit, of the discharge of such a substance within 90 days of the effective date of such regulations. [Cross Reference: 8.03.4040 -6] 8.03.4740 [Reserved] 8.03.4760 Bypass Notification. A. For purposes of this section: 1. "Bypass" means the intentional diversion of wastestreams from any portion of the user's treatment facility. 2. "Severe property damage" personal property to the extent that become inoperable, or substantial and general, the expenses created by the that severe property damage does not shut downs in production. 1. A description of the bypass and its case; 2. The duration of the bypass, including exact dates and times; wastewater or means major physical damage to real or treatment facilities would be caused to permanent loss of natural resources. In damage should exceed $100,000, provided mean economic loss caused by delays or B. If a user knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit a written request for approval to the Director, at least 10 days before the date of the bypass. A user shall give immediate oral notice to the Director of an unanticipated bypass that exceeds applicable pretreatment standards within 24 hours from the time the user becomes aware of the bypass. A written submission shall also be provided within five 5 calendar days of the time the user becomes aware of the bypass. The written submission shall contain: 3. If the bypass has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and 4. The steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate and prevent reoccurrence of the bypass. C. The Director may waive the written report requirement on a case -by- case basis if the oral report has been received within 24 hours. D. Unapproved bypasses constitute a violation of this chapter unless the responsible party establishes, to the Director's satisfaction, that: 1. It does not cause pretreatment standards or requirements to be violated, and it is for essential maintenance to assure efficient facility operations; or 2. It was unavoidable to prevent bodily injury or loss or life, or severe property damage; or Draft - 3/22/96 Page 51 3. No feasible alternatives existed. Feasible alternatives include the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes, revised maintenance schedules during plant downtime or like options; and section. E. The defenses in paragraph D of this section do not apply if adequate back -up equipment could have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment and foreseeability. Part Five: Administrative Provisions 8.03.4780 Retention of Records. A. All users, customers or persons submitting or required to submit information under the provisions of this chapter shall retain and preserve for no less than five (5) years all records, books, documents, memoranda, reports, correspondence and summaries thereof. With respect to reporting or monitoring requirements, required information to be kept and maintained shall specifically include the date, exact place, method, time of sampling, name of sampler, dates any analyses were performed, and who performed the analysis. B. All records pertaining to a enforcement action or litigation must enforcement activities and litigation limitation for all appeals have expired. C. Records or materials required to be retained shall be made available for inspection and copying by the Director at a location within the County or City of Spokane, in a format for convenient access. 8.03.4800 A. In the exercise of sound discretion and in consideration of the purposes of the program and the interests of public health, safety and general welfare, the Director administers and interprets the County's Wastewater Pretreatment Program and this chapter, and determines all questions arising thereunder. The Director's decisions are final except as otherwise specifically provided. B. The Director may promulgate regulations, including prohibitions to specific discharges. A notice of Public Hearing to adopt applicable regulations will be published once in the County's official newspaper a minimum of 10 calendar days in advance of the Hearing by the Board of County Commissioners to adopt said regulations. Users are encouraged to subscribe to such newspaper. C. The Director may entities, as necessary, to the Director deems proper. D. The Director may necessary to enforce the Draft - 3/22/96 4. The user submitted notices required under paragraph B of this Director's Authority. matter which is the subject of an be retained and preserved until all have concluded and all periods of issue warning notices and enforcement orders to enforce the program upon such reasonable notice as take such remedial measures as the Director deems Program, including intervention and takeover of a Page 52 user's pretreatment, monitoring and testing .efforts, direct development and correction of • the same, and /or adapting or adjusting user's activities responsible for a violation. The Director may require the installation of such preventive devices and the modification of such processes and-activities deemed necessary to avoid future violations. Where the Director deems necessary, for enforcement, as a corrective measure or to protect the public health and safety, sewer or water service to the premises concerned may be stopped, suspended, restricted, conditioned, with or without - a Show Cause proceeding. All actions taken pursuant to the authority of this chapter shall be at the user's sole expense and liability. E. The Director may establish procedures to resolve disputed questions of fact or liability within the scope of the his /her authority, including the submission of verified statements, records and /or samples. F. The Director may order a public hearing on a permit application when questions of general public interest may arise. The hearing may be convened by the Director or referred to a Hearings Examiner designated by the County. The Director may publish, at the applicant's expense, notice of a permit issued in the County's official newspaper. G. The County, acting through the Director, reserves and asserts all right and authority to enforce State or Federal pretreatment requirements as an agent of the State or Federal government or as a participating agency in a POTW, and to recover the costs of such enforcement from the violator, the delegating agency or a participating agency as the law may allow. H. The County further reserves the right, either directly or through a POTW participating agency, to negotiate compliance as a contractual condition of providing public sewer or water service, including. liquidated damages, specific performance and other contractual remedies for breach. 8.03.4820 Enforcement Remedies. In addition to the general provisions above, the Director is specifically authorized and empowered to use any of the enforcement remedies listed below, not by way of limitation of any other emergency or enforcement action against a user or violator, including civil or criminal prosecution. Failure of an affected party to respond in a timely manner or to abide by the result of any administrative proceeding initiated under this section shall be deemed a failure of the affected party's right to exhaust available administrative remedies, consent to entry of an adverse determination, and a violation of this chapter: 1. Notice of Violation. Where the Director finds a person subject to this chapter has violated any provision thereof, the Director may issue a Notice of Violation, requiring the recipient to explain the violation and submit a remedial plan to correct the same within 10 days of receipt of the notice or other time set forth therein. 2. Consent or Unilateral Compliance Order. The Director may enter an administrative or judicially sanctioned Consent Order establishing agreement with any user or other person regulated under the authority of this chapter. If consent is not obtained, the Director may issue a Unilateral Compliance Draft - 3/22/96 Page 53 Order. Such order shall state any specific action agreed upon between the parties, the costs and responsibilities, a time period for compliance and any specific penalties, forfeiture of bond or other security required to be posted or other consequences. Consent Orders shall contain a provision of no contest to the entry of a judgment of forfeiture or other appropriate relief in the event of violation of the Consent Order. 3. Show Cause Order. Whenever the Director determines that there is or may be a violation of any provision of this chapter, including regulations and orders made thereunder, the Director may require any person, upon 10 days notice or in such other time as is deemed proper, to show cause why sewer service and /or discharge permit privileges should not be suspended, conditioned, or revoked, or other enforcement consequences stated occur, on account of circumstances appearing to the Director and, further, may require a person to establish proof of compliance. The Show Cause Order shall be served personally or by certified mail upon the party affected. Specific grounds for termination of sewer service shall include: hereunder; a. Violation of Wastewater Discharge Permit terms or conditions; b. Failure to submit timely and accurate reports or data required c. Refusal of records or access to premises required hereunder; d. Failure to report significant changes in operations or in wastewater volume, constituents or characteristics prior to discharge; or e. Violation of the prohibited discharge, categorical standards, or local limits set forth in 8.03.4040 through 8.03.4160. 4. Violation of any requirement imposed under the authority of this chapter shall, in addition, be a public nuisance and subject to summary abatement or the commencement of a judicial proceeding to abate the same, all at the violating party's sole expense and liability. 5. Emergency Action. a. The Director may immediately, with or without such notice and hearing as deemed expedient or proper, suspend a user's discharge to prevent or avoid danger to environment or to the public health and safety, including the continued safe and efficient operation of the POTW and the safety of POTW personnel. b. To accomplish the suspension, the Director may take all due and necessary action, including severance or obstruction of any sewer connection, whether on public or private property, until the Director is satisfied that the danger is removed. 6. Civil or Criminal Prosecution. The Director may request the Prosecuting Attorney to initiate civil and /or criminal prosecution, including but not limited to the seeking of a permanent or temporary injunction to restrain or compel the performance of any action or duty as required under the authority of this chapter. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 54 8.03.4840 Enforcement by County and Other Governmental Agencies -No Rights or Duties Created. A. The Washington State Department of Ecology, operating within its lawful authority, is the primary regulatory agency designated in accordance with Federal and State law to oversee and assist in the development, implementation and enforcement of the requirements of the County's Wastewater Pretreatment Program. B. The County invokes its rights, powers and protections as a political subdivision of the State of Washington, as a utility purveyor and as an agency required to cooperate with Federal, State and local governmental agencies respecting wastewater pretreatment. C. Any provision of the County's Wastewater Pretreatment Program or this chapter may be enforced either pursuant to inherent or delegated regulatory powers and /or as a condition of continued connection to and sewer service from the POTW. These options are cumulative and not alternative. D. The County's Wastewater Pretreatment Program does not confer rights upon or create any duty towards any person, including any permittee under the program. The program remains at all times subject to change by Federal, State and local governmental agencies as may be required to accomplish the purposes of the Act or to promote the public interest. 8.03.4860 Publication of Violators List. A. The Director shall cause to be published at least annually in the County's official newspaper a list of users which, at any time during the , previous (12) months, were in significant non - compliance, as determined by the Director under this section, with applicable pretreatment requirements. B. For the purpose of this section, a user is in significant non- compliance if the user or its violation meets one or more of the following criteria: 1. Is a repeated violator of applicable pretreatment standards or requirements or other wastewater Discharge Limits, defined herein as those in which 66 percent or more of all of the measurements taken during a six month period exceed (by any magnitude) the daily maximum limit or the average limit for the same pollutant parameter; 2. Is a violator of technical review criteria (TRC), defined here as those in which 33 percent or more of all of the measurements for each pollutant parameter taken during a six month period equal or exceed the product of the daily maximum limit or the average limit multiplied by the applicable TRC (TRC =1.4 for BOD, TSS, fats, oil and grease, and 1.2 for all other pollutants except pH); 3. Violates other pretreatment effluent limits (daily maximum or longer -term average) that the Director determines have caused, alone or in combination with other discharges, interference or pass- through, or endangered the health or safety of POTW personnel or the general public; Draft - 3/22/96 Page 55 4. Discharged a pollutant that has endangered human health, welfare or created significant environmental damage or has resulted in the POTW's exercise of its emergency authority under paragraph (f)(1)(vi)(B) of 40 CFR 403.8 to halt or prevent such a discharge; 5. Failed to meet, within 90 days after the schedule date, a compliance schedule milestone contained in a local control mechanism or enforcement order for starting construction, completing construction, or attaining final compliance; 6. Failed to provide, within 30 days after the due date, required reports such as baseline monitoring reports, 90 day compliance reports, periodic self- monitoring reports, and reports on compliance with compliance schedules; 7. Failed to accurately report non - compliance; or 8. Is responsible for any other violation or group of violations which the Director determines adversely affect the operation or implementation of the Wastewater Pretreatment Program. ARTICLE 5000 - GREASE INTERCEPTORS, OIL /WATER SEPARATORS, SAND TRAPS 8.03.5020 Grease Interceptors. Any commercial food facility which generates grease waste shall include a grease interceptor as part of their sewer, or where required by the Director, the Division of Building and Planning or the Health Officer. Including but not limited to hotels, boardinghouses, restaurants, or food processing facilities. Grease interceptors may be located inside or outside the structure. Design and construction specifications are included in the Sewer Standards Handbook. Design and operation shall satisfy the limits contained in 8.03.4160. [Cross Reference: 8.03.6220] 8.03.5040 Oil /Water Separators, Sand Traps. Any commercial facility which discharges petroleum and /or settleable granular particles wastes shall include an oil /water separator and sand trap as part of their sewer system, or where required by the Director, the Division of Building and Planning, or the Health Officer. Such commercial facilities include, but are not limited to, car washes, automotive repair /maintenance facilities, and petroleum stations. Design and construction specifications are included in the Sewer Standards Handbook. Design and operation shall satisfy the limits contained in 8.03.4160. [Cross Reference- 8.03.6220] 8.03.5060 [Reserved] [See 8.03.6220] 8.03.5080 Grease Interceptors, Oil /Water Separators, Sand Traps - Maintenance. Where installed, all grease interceptors, oil /water separators, sand traps shall be maintained by the owner, at his /her expense and liability, in good order and condition at all times. Existing outside grease interceptors Draft 3/22/96 Page 56 connecting to public sewer shall be pumped and inspected by a licensed septic tank pumper prior to connection to the public sewer. If the grease interceptor fails the inspection as not being up to County standards, such grease interceptor will have to be repaired or replaced. All grease interceptors shall be inspected every six (6) months and pumped as needed by a licensed septic tank pumper, there shall be a minimum of'one (1) pumping per year. Upon request from the Director, the owner shall provide receipts of inspections and /or pumping. The owner shall keep all receipts for a one (1) year period. If proper inspection and /or maintenance is not provided, the Director may order the same performed, and all costs incurred, including any related clean-up of the public sewer shall be billed as an additional utility service to the premises concerned. Expenses charged shall include, but are not limited to, pumping, inspection, correcting the problem and cleaning the public sewer. ARTICLE 6000 - SEWER CONSTRUCTION (Cross Reference: 8.03.3300] 8.03.6005 Sewer Installers. Construction of sewers shall only be performed by State of Washington licensed and bonded contractors or by the owner of the property that is to be served by the sewer. Owner installation may be subject to the Director's approval. 8.03.6020 Inspections. A. All public and private sewer construction, repairs, alterations, extensions and abandonment shall be inspected by the Director. 1. One (1) working day ndtice is required for scheduling inspections of sewer installations. Same day sewer inspection requests shall be dependent upon time allotments and inspector availability. The Director reserves the right to set the sewer inspection times. 2. Requests to have inspections occur before or after normal work hours or on weekends or holidays, are subject to the approval of the Director. An extra fee shall be assessed by the Director to cover weekend or holiday inspections and shall be received by the County no later than the preceding workday to the weekend /holiday inspection. [Cross Reference: 8.03.9020 -C] 3. All costs incurred to remedy non - compliance shall be borne entirely by the owner and /or the owner's contractor. A copy of Sewer Connection Permit shall be available at the job site and readily accessible to the inspector. 4. All sewers subject to inspection must be inspected and found satisfactory before any trench may be backfilled or any sewer covered unless specifically authorized by the Director. The installer shall have a ladder of adequate length and in good condition on the job or a sloping trench so that the inspector can enter the trench. If the inspector deems a trench unsafe, he /she need not enter it or complete the inspection. All requirements of the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries shall be observed at all times by the installer . Draft - 3/22/96 Page 57 5. Call back inspection fees may be assessed to the installer for: (a) Re- inspections due to violations of this ordinance or incorrect installations; (b) Partial inspections; or (c) Not being ready at scheduled time (if installer did not call to cancel or reschedule at least one half hour in advance). [Cross Reference: 8.03.9020 -C] B. The Health Officer will permit or inspect on -site sewage disposal systems as defined in Spokane County Health District Rules and Regulations for Sewage Disposal Systems. 8.03.6040 Sewer Connection Permit Required. A. A Sewer Connection Permit as authorized by the Director and issued by the Division of Building and Planning is required in order to construct, repair, alter, extend or abandon any side sewer. B. For a single family residential unit, one (1) permit is required for each separate building connecting to the sewer. C. For a condominium, townhouse, duplex, triplex or fourplex with separate ownership (as determined by lot lines) separate address and separate stub, one (1) permit is required per address per stub. D. For a single building duplex, triplex or fourplex with single ownership, one (1) permit is required. E. Multiple buildings (apartments, industrial complexes) with single ownership, one (1) permit required per building connecting to the sewer. F. Sewer Connection Permit requirements not specifically covered above, shall be as determined by the Director. 8.03.6060 [Reserved] 8.03.6080 Sewer ULID Waiver Agreement. A. Where an owner of property seeks to connect to the POTW, and the Director determines either that lateral service is unavailable or that public sewer service is being provided on an interim basis, such owner shall obtain from the Director, as a condition of connection, a Sewer Waiver Agreement for a utility local improvement district (ULID) sewer assessments. Said agreement shall provide that the signatory: 1. Waives the right to protest the establishment of any ULID for the installation of a public sewer which may be proposed; and 2. Joins in said ULID petition creating said district. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 58 B. The owner shall record and pay all filing fees required for the recording of the Sewer Waiver Agreement with the County Auditor. 8.03.6100 Costs of Installation and Connection - Indemnity. A. All costs incident to the installation and connection of a side sewer, special side sewer or private sewer shall be paid by the owner. B. The owner and /or State of Washington licensed and bonded contractor performing sewer installation and connection shall indemnify the County from any loss, liability, or damage that may directly or indirectly be occasioned by the installation of the owner's side sewer, dry side sewer, special side sewer or private sewer, and shall be responsible to repair and restore any defects or problems in the vicinity of said construction. Responsibility includes but is not limited to damage done in or to the public right -of -way. 8.03.6140 Extensions -Risk. In cases of extension, construction or reconstruction of all or any portion of a side sewer, the owner and /or his /her State of Washington licensed and bonded contractor is responsible for the proper functioning of the entire side sewer including the sewer stub, and shall indemnify and hold harmless Spokane County for any cost, expense, loss, liability or damage caused by any malfunction of said side sewer. This section also applies to special side sewers and private sewers. 8.03.6160 Eligibility for Sewer Connection Permit. A. A Sewer Connection Permit will be issued only to current Washington State licensed and bonded contractors, the owner of property to be served by the sewer, or the owner's authorized agent (who shall not be the licensed contractor) in the owner's name. Such owner may be required to furnish reasonable proof of ownership. The Director has the authority to determine any other eligibility. B. The applicant must apply for a Sewer Connection Permit on a form provided by the Division of Building and Planning, pay the prescribed fee(s) and be issued a permit as authorized by the Director prior to any construction on the project, whether on private property or within public right-of-ways or easements. C. Property owners or first time contractors who intend to perform work requiring a Sewer Connection Permit shall first contact the Division of Utilities for information regarding construction regulations and standards. The Director must sign the application form in order for the applicant to be issued the Sewer Connection Permit D. If the work to be done under the Sewer Connection Permit requires the excavation or obstruction of the public right -of -way, the applicant shall be responsible to obtain a permit to perform work in the County right -of -way from the Division of Engineering. E. Except as specifically authorized by the Director, Sewer Connection Permits will not be issued until the public sewer system serving the premises Draft - 3/22/96 Page 59 has been accepted for operation by the Director. In some cases, connection agreements, fees or engineered plans approved by the Division of Utilities may be required before the Director will authorize issuance of the Sewer Connection Permit. F. All Sewer Connection Permits shall expire twelve (12) months from date of issuance. 8.03.6180 Permit Required for Each Private Sewer Connection Each extension of a private sewer to a residence, structure or property shall require a separate Sewer Connection Permit in accordance with 8.03.604. [Cross References: 8.03.1690, 8.03.6160] 8.03.6200 [Reserved] 8.03.6220 Sewer Construction Regulations. A. The Director is authorized to prepare, revise and administer standards, as established by resolution by the Board of County Commissioners, describing proper controls for design, inspection and construction of sewer systems in conformance with this chapter and to insure that the health, safety and welfare of the public are protected. The standards shall be printed in manual form as a portion of the "Spokane County Standards Handbook for Road and Sewer Construction" (referred to as the "Sewer Standards Handbook ", see 8.03.1835) in accordance with and shall be considered part of this chapter. B. The Sewer Standards Handbook may contain specifications relative to materials, design, construction, procedure, policy, inspection, backfilling and responsibilities in sewer installations. C. The permissibility of specific situations not fully covered in this chapter or the Sewer Standards Handbook, will be determined by the Director at the time of occurrence in accordance with the spirit and purpose of the code. D. The Director may issue a Cease and Desist Order against sewer construction in County's sewer service area by any person who fails to comply with any provision of this chapter related to sewer construction. Any such violation or instance of non - compliance may result in said violator(s) appearance at an Administrative Hearing before the Director to determine the facts for possible issuance of a Cease and Desist Order and its duration. The result of any Administrative Hearing shall not preclude the County from pursuing additional legal action in accordance with Article 900 herein. 8.03.6240 8.03.6260 8.03.6280 A. Authorized personnel of the Health Officer or the Divisions of Utilities, Engineering or Building and Planning, shall have the right to enter upon any premises, public or private, as reasonably necessary to enforce the Draft - 3/22/96 [Reserved] [Reserved] Enforcement Inspections. Page 60 provisions of this chapter, any other ordinance relative to wastewater control, or any regulation or order adopted or issued pursuant thereto. B. The owner or occupant of any house, building, or property shall specifically allow the Health Officer or Director to inspect on -site the nature of wastes intended to be discharged into a public sewer and /or on -site sewage disposal system. C. In the event it appears there is any violation, the County may, in addition to any other power or authority reserved in this chapter, issue a Notice of Violation, requiring the party to whom the notice is directed to correct the violation within 30 days of the date of the notice. Failure to take such corrective action is an additional violation of this chapter, but no Notice is necessary in case of emergency or as a prior requirement to taking any other enforcement action authorized in this chapter. 8.03.6300 Excavation and Cleaning A. Any expenses incurred by the County for excavation, cleaning or inspecting a sewer, as a result of a discharge prohibited by this chapter or improper maintenance or repair of a sewer, shall be the responsibility of the property owner, agent, occupant or other requesting party, jointly and severally, unless the Director determines the problem was caused by a public sewer. B. All expense and liability for loss or damage for cleaning, repairing and maintenance of a side sewer or a private sewer from the building drain to the public sewer shall be the responsibility of the property owner, agent, occupant or other requesting party, jointly and severally. 8.03.6320 Construction Plans. A. The Director may require sewer construction plans designed by a professional engineer to be submitted for review and approval, including but not limited to, larger new and existing commercial sewer connections, public sewers, plats, developments, pressure sewers including pump specifications, private sewers, or any other sewer construction the Director deems necessary. In any case where a plan is required, a reproducible as -built shall also be required to be submitted to the Division of Utilities within 30 days after the completion of sewer construction for review and approval. Extensions may be granted by the Director. B. Changes to approved plans must have the prior written approval of Director and /or resubmitted for review and approval before starting any work. The Director may stop any work upon determining that the work is not being performed according to the approved plans, and may direct corrections of such work to comply with the approved plans and specifications, and this chapter. C. In any case where a plan is required, no work shall begin without an approved plan and a set of the approved plans shall be on the job site and readily accessible to the inspector. 8.03.6340 (Reserved] Draft - 3/22/96 Page 61 ARTICLE 7000 - SPECIAL CONNECTION AGREEMENTS 8.03.7020 Special Connection Agreements - Execution. Whenever connection to the County's public sewer requires a written agreement, the Director is authorized to submit the same for approval to the Board of County Commissioners under the authority of this chapter. 8.03.7040 [Reserved] 8.03.7045 Connection of Properties Outside County ULIDs. Properties located outside the boundaries of a County ULID may connect to the County's general sewerage system, at the discretion of the Director, under the following circumstances: 1. The capacity in the existing POTW, as determined by the Director, is available in an amount sufficient to accommodate the sewage generated by the added development; and 2. The property owner shall execute a Sewer Connection Agreement, as prepared by the Director, obligating the owner to pay applicable fees and charges, and obtain a Sewer Connection Permit and pay the fees therefore. The agreement may also contain other provisions deemed appropriate by the Director, for connection of the property to the County's system, including, without limitation, provisions requiring the property owner to waive objection or agree to formation of a County ULID that includes the property [Cross Reference: 8.03.6080]; or 3. Property owners or developers of property may obtain sewer service by constructing or financing an extension to existing public facilities, provided: a. The proposed facility is constructed in substantial conformance with the County's Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan, sewerage plans for the area adopted by the Division of Utilities, and all applicable laws and regulations; b. The public sewer extension is built to County design criteria and construction standards, is located within County right -of -ways or easements, and is conveyed to the County free and clear of all liens and encumbrances; c. The property owner or developer agrees to the requirements for private sewer extensions referenced in this chapter and the Sewer Standards Handbook. [Cross Reference: 8.03.6220] d. In the event the owner or builder constructs public sewer 15 inches or larger, the County may, at its option, design that portion of the line. The County may require reimbursement of all or a portion of the cost of design. If GFC credits are allowed, the design cost will be deducted from the GFC credit; Draft - 3/22/96 Page 62 e. The property owner or developer provides warranty and security, in a form approved by the Director, for public lines for a period of one (1) year after acceptance of the facilities by the Director for O&M; and g. The property owner or developer executes a Developer Connection Agreement which incorporates the provisions of a Sewerage Connection Agreement as referenced in this chapter. The agreement shall be prepared by the Director and may contain other provisions deemed appropriate by the Director to ensure proper connection to the County's General Sewerage System; 8.03.7060 Temporary Sewer Connections A. A Sewer Connection Permit may be issued for temporary sewer connections only for the connection of temporary structures as approved by the Director. Temporary sewer connections shall be for a period of no more than two (2) years, or as otherwise approved by the Director based on specific project conditions. B. All temporary connections shall comply with the requirements contained in Articles 6000 and 7000, except as noted below: 1. A Sewer Connection Permit, designating the connection as temporary, is required for all temporary connections. 2. The County shall only bill the owner for the monthly O&M fees. C. After two (2) years, the connection shall be deemed permanent unless an extension is requested and approved by the Director. Once deemed permanent, the Sewer Connection Permit will be amended to designate the connection as permanent and the current connection charges shall be due. 8.03.7080 (Reserved] 8.03.7100 (Reserved] 8.03.7120 Special Connection Charge. A. Property or portions thereof located outside a ULID and connecting to the County's general sewerage system by the extension of or connection to any permanent wastewater facilities shall be subject to a special connection charge, in addition to the general facility charge (GFC) imposed under Spokane County Code (SCC) chapter 8.52. The special connection charge shall be due and payable, and subject to the same lien, interest, penalty and collection provision applicable to the GFC under SCC sections 8.52.090 and 8.52.100. B. The special connection charge shall represent a proportionate share of the capital cost of those portions of the County's general sewerage system that do not comprise general facilities as defined in SCC chapter 8.52. The special connection charge shall be calculated based on the methods used to calculate special assessments in ULIDs formed by the County, using the cost per square foot, frontage adjustments, side sewer charges and County participation levels in such ULIDs as a guide. The amount of the special connection charge shall be set each calendar year by the County. The Director may use any other method to Draft - 3/22/96 Page 63 compute the special connection charge which may be deemed to more fairly reflect a parcel's proportionate share of the capital costs described above. C. If a property owner constructs or finances a public sewer to connect to the County's system, the cost of such construction may be used to offset the special connection charge. 8.03.7140 Reimbursement for Construction of Public Sewer A. If a property owner or developer is required by the Director to construct or finance a public sewer extension with capacity in excess of that required by law to serve said property or development (pipe 15 inches or greater or in excess of 200 feet beyond the property served), the Developer Connection Agreement may, at the discretion of the Director, provide for reimbursement and interest to the developer or owner for the value of such excess capacity. 1. Reimbursement for excess capacity may be accomplished, at the discretion of the Director, utilizing one or any combination of the reimbursement alternatives detailed below: a. An offset to special connection charges, of facilities served; b. Reimbursement from ULID bonds, if the bonds are issued within 10 years of connection of the property and are for a ULID that includes the subject property and incorporates the public sewer as part of the ULID improvements; and, the developer or owner waives objection to and agrees to formation of a County ULID that includes the property; c. If the public sewer extension includes County general facilities, the Director may credit the value of any excess capacity provided in such general facilities against the owner or developer's obligation to pay GFCs or similar capital facilities charges imposed by County ordinance or resolution. Excess capacity will be determined by the difference between the cost of construction of the minimum required line for that development and the costs of construction for the oversized line. The service area will be established by the County as the boundary where within which reimbursement will .apply; and /or d. Through latecomer reimbursement pursuant to chapter 35.91 RCW; e. Reimbursement of special connection charges for new connections to a developer constructed sewer. In the event the County collects a special connection charge for a property connecting to Developer constructed public sewer. 2. Interest: a. An owner or developer may receive interest on reimbursements at the discretion of the Director. The interest rate shall be the Construction Cost Index as listed in the Engineering News record publication for the Seattle regional area and adjusted annually on February 1 using the January 1 Construction Cost Index. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 64 3. In the event a combination of the above reimbursements are allow, total reimbursement shall not exceed a predetermined credit amount plus interest. 4. The term of reimbursement, including interest, shall be no longer than 10 years. ARTICLE 8000 - [Reserved] ARTICLE 9000 - ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS 8.03.9020 Rates and Regulations. A. Pretreatment: •• NOTE: The County's pretreatment fee schedule has not been fully finalized, but will be incorporated in the draft prepared for the Public Rearing on this Ordinance. It is the County's intention to design a fee schedule which will model the City of Spokane's fee schedule (attached). B. Administrative Review Fees shall be as follows: 1. Sewer Facility Plan Check: a. Gravity Collection Lines: $.60 per linear foot of public gravity sewer pipe with a $50.00 minimum. b. Community On -Site Treatment and Disposal Facilities: $100.00 flat fee, plus $5.00 per 350 gallons per average daily design flow for the project. c. Pump Stations: $100 flat fee plus $5.00 for each 350 gallons per average daily design flow for the project plus $.20 per linear foot of pressure sewer pipe. 2. Planning Action, Review Procedures: $20.00 per action, including plats, short plats, planned unit development, binding site plans, variances, conditional use permits, zone changes, or changes of conditions and similar actions. If the planning action is withdrawn, the sponsor may request a refund. The actual refund will be determined by the Director based on County action /review completed prior to withdrawal. C. Sewer Connection Permit fees, per building or structure, shall be as follows: 1. Application: $10.00. 2. Permit (Includes One Inspection): $90.00. 3. Tap into Public Sewer: $100.00. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 65 4. Call Back Inspection: $50.00. 5. Weekend /Holiday Inspections: $85.00. 6. Work Without Permit: Applicable fees plus $200 Administrative Fee. D. Sewer service fees shall apply to all properties provided with sanitary sewer service by sewage facilities, operated and maintained by the County, including those within subdivisions on interim sewage facilities. The following monthly schedule of fees are for each unit connected to the County's sewage system: 1. Single Family Residence: $17.50 per unit. 2. Duplex (each dwelling unit being a unit): $17.50 per unit. 3. Triplex, Apartment or Apartment Condominium (each dwelling unit being a unit): 80% of the monthly service charge for single family residences. 4. Business and Commercial Unit: $17.50 per unit for the first 900 cubic feet of water consumption and $1.10 per each 100 cubic fee over 900 cubic feet per unit. E. Properties connecting to the County's general sewerage system outside a ULID may pay a special connection charge in accordance with Article 7000 of this chapter. F. All properties connecting to the County's general sewerage system shall pay the GFC pursuant to SCC chapter 8.52. G. The Board of County Commissioners will determine the terms and conditions of connection of properties located outside the County's service area seeking to connect to the County's general sewerage system. H. The Board of County Commissioners has the authority to fix a schedule of charges for items and services not otherwise provided for. 8.03.9040 Payment - Delinquency -Lien. A. All charges for services rendered, including sewer service, special jobs, labor and materials, are payable to the Division of Utilities. B. If such charges are not paid, upon delinquency the amount thereof shall become a lien against the premises receiving sewer service as provided in RCW 36.94.150, and may further be enforced as provided therein. C. All additional lien and enforcement rights by statute and at common law are reserved by the County. 8.03.9060 Persons and Property Subject to Charges. Every person and property to whom service is furnished by the POTW, and every person and property to whom such service is available by said POTW, shall be charged for such service. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 66 8.03.9080 Abatement of Public Nuisance. A. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter and in addition thereto, the maintenance of any condition contrary to the public health and safety, or creating or tending to create a risk to the public health or safety, specifically including accumulations of raw or treated sewage or sludge of any nature, or danger or possibility thereof, or contamination of any public or domestic water supply system or well, or a danger or possibility thereof, shall constitute a public nuisance and, in the discretion of the Director or Health Officer, shall be subject to immediate abatement by the County at the premises owner's and /or other responsible person's expense and liability. B. Abatement of any nuisance as defined'above may be billable as a utility service furnished to the premises wherein the condition arose or exists. C. This section shall not limit the premises owner's or other party's rights to seek recovery against other responsible persons. D. Specifically, any violation of the County's Wastewater Pretreatment Program, including the regulations and orders made pursuant to its authority, is a public nuisance and is subject to abatement, including summary abatement, by. the Director, the Health Officer, or the Washington State Department of Ecology, all at the expense of the responsible party. [Cross Reference: RCW 35.67.200 et seq.] 8.03.9100 Suspension of Service. A. In the case of emergency, equipment failure, inaccessibility or for other reasons, as directed by the Director in the interests of the public health and safety, sewer services, may be temporarily or permanently suspended to one or more premises or locations within the County, with or without notice. B. Service to any premises may be suspended for non - payment of accounts. Such suspension shall not relieve the person owing such account from the duty of complying with the provisions of this title. Such suspension shall render the premises where such service is suspended subject to condemnation for sanitary reasons and /or exercise of the police power to abate a public nuisance at the risk and expense of the owner of the premises and /or other responsible persons. 8.03.9120 Equipment- Projects -Minor Expenditures. A. To the maximum extent permitted by state law, the Director may acquire such equipment, engage in projects, enter into contracts, and perform such functions as may enable the Division of Utilities to carry out its wastewater collection and treatment responsibilities and such other purposes as the Board of County Commissioners may direct and authorize. These powers shall be broadly construed to accomplish their intended purpose. B. The Board of County Commissioners has authority to approve departmental expenditures of funds for equipment and projects, which may be funded by the respective department fund, by grant, or by appropriation from Draft - 3/22/96 Page 67 Federal, State, or local resources as the Board of County Commissioners deems appropriate. 8.03.9140 Responsibility for Sewers -No Duty. A. The County assumes no responsibility whatsoever for any side sewers, special side sewers, private sewers, other non - public sewers or other such pipes, fixtures, appurtenances or location of utilities. The County's absence of responsibility includes costs of construction, repair and /or maintenance and liability for losses, claims, damages or injuries arising directly or indirectly from the use or existence of all such non - public pipes and fixtures. B. Except as required by the general laws of this State, the County assumes no responsibilities for sewer service or wastewater disposal or treatment or for the construction, repair or maintenance of public sewers. This chapter shall not be construed to expand the County's responsibilities. This chapter shall not be construed to add to or expand any public duty to any particular person, class or entity. Any duty nonetheless deemed created shall be strictly construed as a duty to the general public. 8.03.9160 Penalty A. Any person who violates or fails to comply with any of the provisions of this chapter, or who counsels, aids or abets any such violation or failure to comply, shall be subject to a civil penalty of $1,000. B. Non - compliance after the expiration of the time specified in any notice authorized in this chapter shall be a separate violation for each notice. Each day of a continuing violation shall constitute a separate and additional violation. C. [Reserved] [See: 8.03.4860, 40 CFR 403.8(f) (2) (vii)] D. Willful violations of 8.03.3180, 8.03.3200, 8.03.3220, 8.03.3240, 8.03.3260, 8.03.3280, 8.03.3300 or of the terms and conditions of a Wastewater Discharge Permit or applicable pretreatment standard shall constitute a misdemeanor, punishable by the a fine of up to $5,000 or imprisonment of one (1) year in jail, or by both such fine and imprisonment. E. In all cases of violation of the Wastewater Pretreatment Program, whether civil or criminal, restitution of damages, costs and expenses will be required. [Cross Reference: 8.03.4820] 8.03.9180 Search Warrants - Administrative, Criminal A. Supplemental to and not by way of limitation of any other provisions in this chapter, the Director, on his /her initiative or application of any County official or inspector may issue an administrative search warrant or order, requesting the presence of law enforcement officials to assist County employees in the performance of any inspection or administrative duties, but no such warrant or order shall be a necessary precondition or any request for law enforcement officer assistance to any other public employee in the performance of his /her duties under this chapter. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 68 B Where deemed appropriate, to enforce provisions of this chapter subject to criminal penalties,. the Director may work with local law enforcement officers in obtaining criminal search warrants, subject to generally applicable requirements (probable cause) for such warrants. 8.03.9190 Repeal and Savings. Any amendment, repeal, modification or revision of this chapter shall not be construed to affect any existing right acquired under provisions amended, repealed, modified, revised, or acquired under any rules, regulations or orders issued or adopted pursuant to the authority of this chapter, or as affecting any proceedings instituted thereunder. 8.03.9200 Severability If any section, subdivision, part or word of this chapter or any regulation, rule or order adopted pursuant to the authority thereof be determined invalid, it shall not affect the remainder, but be confined to the section, subdivision, part or word directly involved in the controversy. Draft - 3/22/96 Page 69 PASSED and ADOPTED this day of , 1996. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE CLERK OF THE BOARD BY: ROSANNE MONTAGUE, DEPUTY CLERK DEPUTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON PHILLIP D. HARRIS, CHAIRMAN JOHN ROSKELLEY STEVEN HASSON APPROVED AS TO FORM - , 1996 Draft - 3/22/96 Page 70 Sanitary Sewer Ordinance Pretreatment Rates NOTE: The County's pretreatment fee schedule has not been fully finalized, but will be incorporated in the draft prepared for the Public Hearing on this Ordinance. It is the County's intention to design a fee schedule which will model the City of Spokane's fee schedule (attached). [Cross Reference 8.03.9020 -A] PART II - WASTEWATER RATES AND REGULATIONS Section 1. j sffis. Section 1.01.010. "Adusted means revised a adjusted by the Directs. Section 1.01.020. " Approved" means approved by the Director urdess otherwise specified. Sedim 1.01.030. "Apartment /kit means a dwelling unit occupying a portion of a praises containing two or more dwelling units on a cannon nut, as reflected in the records of the Utilities Billing Division. Sedim 1.01.040. [Note: The following sections apply sped- tally to Wastewater Management ser- vices.] A. "Basic Service Charge" nears charges applied to users of the wastewater treatment system for (1) the cost to the City of Spokane attributed to accounting services, loot debts services, tastes, billing and account collection fa providing sewerage service, (2) for the cost of collection and treatment of stomwater irdlaw and the groundwater infiltration, and (3) system inprovenEts, each to be divided by the approximate runner of naidpal sewer service accounts is of users. B. The basic service charges, as set forth in Appe dx A. shall be reviewed and may be adtsted by the Director su3sject to the amoral of the City Council Section 1.01.050. "Commercial User" nears any person, not classified as an Indusbiat User a Domestic User, doing business safely in the Construction, Wholesale, Retail, Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, Service a Public Adniristratiah Industries and esters, as described by the Standard Industrial Classification Manual 1972. Sectan1.01.060. 'Commercial lser Charge'mearsthechargeap lied to a commercial user service accouad for the cost of treating the volume of wastewater from that service account of a standard strength of BOO, SS and P. plus a surcharge a credit for the tmatrerd of wastewater of more or less than standard wastewater strength as determined by wastewater monitoring, from a specific commercial user. Section 1.01.070. 'Director nears the Director of Wastewater Manage- Trent of the City of Spokane, a his authorized deputy, agent or re xesen- tative. Section 1.01. 080. " Discharge" nears the quantity of wastewater, sewerage or other liquid material released into the sewage system of the City of Spokane as determined by. (1) w lard metering by the City of Spokane of areal wastewater flay from a specific property; or (2) water eonsurrpdm at a spadfic property as deterni ed by actual metering of water supply from all spaces: or w:\D: \BILLING \BB WERUILBB, (3) number (2) above, as ac§uated for sanitary usage by employees and/or co surptive water uses determined not to contribute wastewater Ioadug to the sewage collection and treatment system as r easured by methods appwed by the Director. Bonbon 1.01. 090. 'Domestic Use" means any person having waste- v.eter treatment system service furnished or available to the person's awn dwelling unit. Section 1.01.095. "Availability of Sewer". See service shall be deeded available where the land structure or premises served is looted within 200 feet of a street. ficitmay, alley, a eased e l in wlirh a public sever is located, mess otherwise ordered by the City En (SMC 13.03.0304, pare D). Sedim 1.01. 100. "Domestic User Charge" means the charge applied to a single dwelling uit for the collecting and treating of the standard wastewater strength loafing from an average single dwelling unit. The domestic user charge shall be the minimum user charge for any dass of user served by the City of Spokane wastewater treatment system The darestic user charges, as set forth in Appendx C, shall be reviewed and may be Ousted by the Director, subject to the approval of the City Card. Section 1.01. 110. 'Dwelling Unit" means a structure or portion of a structure capable of habitation by a single family, indudng but not lirrited to private houses, each unit of a du a apartment house, or a mobile hone. Sedim 1.01.120. 'Industrial User" means any person doing business in the Agricultural, Forestry, Fshir g, Mnirg, Marxdactuirg, Transportation or Utility Industries and otters, as described by the Standard Industrial Classification Manual 1972, Divisions A B, D or E. Section 1.01.130. 9rdustial User Charge" means the charge applied to an industrial user service account fa the ant of treating the whine of wastewater from that service amount ud of a standard strength of BOD, SS and P, plus a surcharge or aedd for the treatment of wastewater of more a Tess than standard wastewater strength as determined by wastewater ronitaing from a spttific industrial user. Sedion1.01. 140. 'Past" mans any individual, hardly, firm, corrparry, association, society, corporation or other entity or gap. Sedim 1.01.150. A. 'Process tAestewrater Loafing' means (1) all wastewater from an industrial use that exceed the upper tints of constituent ptllutards: BOD, SS, or P, established for standard wastewater strength and (2) all standard atrenah wastewaters from the industrial processes of an industrial user. B. If wastewater flaws from sanitary conveniences and industrial processing areas are separately dsdharged and monitored, only those wastewater flows from arising areas shall be considered as process wastewater swing. C. If all wastewater flaws are confined b discharge and monitoring, and BCD, SS and/or P moertlrffion in such combined wastewater flaws exceed the trope Grits for the constituent pollutants established for standard strength wastewater, then the entire dsdierge shall be considered to be process wastewater laa&rg. Section 1.01. 160. "P(eti adh.eaht of Wastes" peas the treatment of wastewater at its source to madly the nahre of concentration of oastituent pollutants in the wastewater prior to its discharge into the rrrrtidpal sewer system Sewn 1.01.170. A "Standard V estewater Strength" or "Standard Strength Sewage" mess wastewater containing constituents typical of wastewater dis- charged from domestic dwelling units in the City of Spokane, specifically 210 milligrams per liter (myl) of BOD, 170 mg /I SS, and 12.4 mg /I P. B. Wastewater which is detemined, by analysis of monitored sample, by the Director, to be within the range of one standard deviation on either side of the typical value: (BOD between 160 and 260 ng& SS between 125 and 215 mg& and P between 916 and 15.2 mgt) and not containing other dements, materials or substances at cancer bdlon levels a amounts known to be detrimental to the structure a operation of the Spokane Wastewater Treatmerd System or hazardous to the health of municipal employees, and which will not cause the mredpaliy to violate its National Pdlu tr Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) Permit will be considered as being of standard wastewater strength. Section 1.01.180. A "User Charge" nears the charge requred to we the costs of collection and treatment of wastewaters dsdharged to the Spokane Wastewater Treatment System, inducing treatment of the wastewater to remove: (1) suspended solids (SS), (2) biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and (3) Phosphorus (P), as necessary to meet the standards established under State and Federal law for r Silcipal sewage effluent, as set forth in the City of Spokane's NPDES wastewater dsposal permit, and the costs for the disposal of treated wastewater and any residuals. B. The user charge rates, as set forth in Appendix B, shall be reviewed and may be adusted annually by the Director, abject to the approval of the City Council, to accurately reflect the costs for treating each unit volume of wastewater and fret quaeity of the above constituents, as necessary to comply with the requrere is of the City of Spokane's NPDES wastewater dsdharge permit [Cross reference Appends( B, provision 1]. C. The user charge will consist of a charge calculated, by the Director, for the oemuied and disposal of dsdhages of standard wastewater strength, plus a surcharge or credit to be applied to carrnerdal user and industrial user sewer service accounts based upon the quality of constituent pollutants: BOD, SS, a P, in the wastewater strength as set forth in Appendix B. The amount of the surcharge shall be detemined by an analysis, by the Director, of the wastewater being dscarged by specific orvrerdal and industrial users. Section 1.01. 190. "Wastewater badn g" means the volume of wastewataflowad its constituent pollutants inducing: sing: 5day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) suspended solids (SS), and total phosphors (P). Section 1.01. 200. 'Wastewater treatment system" means and includes the system of sanitary or cartined sewers, °Afalls, treatment works, A:\U:\BI LING\sEWERVr.Ea eq ipment, facilities, and lad awned and utilized by the City of Spokane for sewage treatment and disposal, or any at all such facilities. Section 2 $alga. Rates and charges for the furnishing of service to those saved by the system of sewerage of the City of Spokane, or having such service available, shall be as follows: Section 2.01.010. A Single dwelling units, apartment house units, mobile hone units ad trailer perk units which are shown to pay as separate aoaxrds in the records of the Utilities Billing Division of the City of Spo shall be charged the basic service charge plus one domestic user charge (See Appanda C). B. Family day care hares, as defined in Section 1 D, Pat 11 of the Water Rates and Reguatias, are considered domestic users and shall be charged the basic service charge plus me domestic user charge. Sedim 201.020. A All apartment house, multiple unit dweili g, mobile here and trailer park service accounts s shall be charged the basic service charge pIus a domestic user chargeforte first ure. Each additonalunit will becharged the same nets a customer service charge (billing charge) of 400 per unit, provided all units in the convex are billed at paid came amount to the Utilities Billing Division. (See Appends C). B. No vacancy allowance will be made on any hose in a group saved by ale meter unless all hoses served by me meta we vacant and the water is shtd off at the City valve by the Department of Water & Hydro- electric Services. Section 2.01.030. A Commercial users shall be charged, for each accoure, the basic service charges, plus the user charge or the rate for a single dwelling unit, wteche'a is greater. B. The commercial user charge shall be determined for each amount amazing to: (1) actual metering by the City of Spokane of wastewater flow from a specific property, or (2) water carsunp6m at a specific property as determined by actual metering by the City of Spokane of water supplied from all sources; or (3) Carsunptive water uses detemined by the Director not to contribute wastewater baring to the sewage collection and treatment system as measured by methods approved by the Director. and either. (1) the user Merge rate for startled camhadal wastewater strength, or (2) the rate for standard commercial wastewater strength plus a surcharge (see Appendix B & C). C. The carrnedal user surcharge or credit shall be placated from the strength of the wastewater dsdwged by a spedfic user, as detemined by a naetaring pragdrn conducted by the Director, of the individual discharge of the u. nmerdal user a for the drsdnarge of a typical representative of a dass d armorial users. D. A commercial, a dass of cormnerdal, user's wastewater sheath shall be determined by the Qty during a monitoring period each yew, conducted by the Directs. Time interval cenposite sanpes taken at the wastewater monitoring acoess (see Section 3.01.020) stall be used to detemrine wastewater strength artless flaw proportional sampling equipment is available (see Section 3), in which case the samples shall be flow =portioned E. The commercial user surcharge rate shall be established annually, where applicable, for the commercial entity based on data for the previous sampling period and may be adusted at the end of each year fa funkre billing periods, by the Director, subject to the approval of the Qty Council. Section 2.01.040. Domestic units in combination with corrrmendal use facilities, where the account is metered and paid as one amount to the Utilities Billing Division shall be as fdlows: Ore basic service dirge is the corrnwr S user large plus the basic service flange, less erect for astomer service costs, for each domestic dwelling unit of the maples per month. Section 2.01.050. A Industrial uses shall be charged, for each account, the basic service charges plus their established use large. B. The industrial user large shall be determined fa each amount a rcfi g to: (1) constant metering by the City of Spokane of actual wastewater flow from a spedfic property; a (2) water consumption at a spedfic property as determined by actual metering by the City of Spokane of water supplied from all sauces; or (3) Consumptive water uses determined by the Diredo not to contribute wastewater loading to the sewage cdledion and treatneit system as measured by methods approved by the Director. and either. (1) the user charge rate for standard wastewater strength, a (2) the rate for standard wastewater strength plus a surcharge or credit (see Appendix B). C. The industrial user surcharge shall be calorlated from the strength of the wastewater dsdharged by a specific use, as determined by a mortaring program conducted by tie Director, of the indvidual dscarge of the industrial use or for the dsdarge of a typical representative of a dass of industrial uses. D. An industrial user's or dass of industrial user's wastewater strength shall be detemhined by the City during a rnonitairg period each year, conducted by the Director. Time interval composite samples taken at the wastewater rmeitaing access (see Section 3 01 020) shall be used to dete hire wastewater strength unless flay proportional sampling A\rk\ BILLING \SB W BBUMB6 equipment is available (see Sedien 3), in which rase the samples shall be flaw proportioned Bertha 2.01.060. Inmbial users falling within the classification of Section 3.01.040 will be monitored are each six months by the Qty as a Milner to establish wastewater strength for utilization in computing the user Marge surcharge. Other industrial user mortaring will be on an annual basis. The industrial user surcharge rate shall be established annelty for the irdustry based m data from the previous sampling period and may be a4usted at the end of each year for future billing periods. Section 201.070. Other sew chsbids a municipalities depositing wastewater into the Spokane mu nidpd seer system under contract with the City of Spokane shall be charged the anent industrial rate of wastewater loafing based upon mastered of flow and waste constituents plus a service fee to recover amounting, debt service and billing menses as determined by the Director. Al industries dscharging to the tributary t4strid shall be subject to user charges for extra strength wastewater as if they wee axnreded drably to the City of Spokae waste eter collection system Sediah 201.080. A Septage hales shall be charged a foxed rate per 1000 gallons of truth tank capacity for each load dumped into the Spokane municipal sewage cdleiion system, to reflect the cost of treabrent of a full tuck volume of septage of average sbength as established by the Director, plus a service fee for handing. B. Each septage hale must log each bad dumped with designated wastewater berried plant operating personnel, and must comply with City ales for wive dumping procedures, times and dean-up, and must carry in the vehicle a copy of a certificate estahiistimg the total tuck tank vdu e. This certificate shall consist of (Ilan approved olalatian of total truck ta k volume, or (2) an approved report of an actual dspare nt test to detemine volume. The certificate shall masterly inicete the total capacity of the vehicle for hauling septage. The Marge toseptagehaulers (Appendoc E) shall be reviews and may be adusted annually for future billing periods. Section 1 Section 101. 010. Commercial and industrial users whit, derive their water supply solely from the water system of the City of Spokane shall be Banged by velure of flaw based upon either Qty water meter rings, spewed wastmeterflow 'tutoring appment, oby such other method as shall be approved by the Director. section 101. 020. Cammedal ad indu sbiS uses which derive all a part of their water supply from wells or sauces other than the Qty of Spokane shall be charged by velum d wastewater flow based upon either re dugs from Qty approved water meters, apprmed wastewater flow monitoring ea/anent, or other methods approved by the Director. Sedim 101. 030. Carrnerdal and industrial users which derive all or part of the wastewater born product concert moisture oondersalim, foundation drains, yard drains, or other non-metered sources, shall install approved wastewater flow monitoring equipment upon notice given by the Director. Secant 3.01.040. A Industrial users which rrnbibute more than 150,000 gallons (20,000 cubic feet) per day of wastewater flow, 360 lbs. of BOD per day, 210 lbs. of SS per day, adlor 16 lbs. of P per day, as an average for any seven days in each year, shall install ap wastewater flaw metering, recerdng and totalizing equipment and refrigerated, proportional to flaw, sampling equimen . B. If sic h industrial users do not supply approved monitoring facilities, they shall provide to the City every three months a report on wastewater Toads for periods of naval operations based upon a ninimrn of seven days of flow proportioned sampling. The report shall be prepared by an approved independent licensed engineer or approved independent laboratory. Section 3.01.050. A Designs and pans of wastewater flow measurement and sampling installations mast be submitted to the Dlreaar for approval prior to installation. Row a level se sac equdprrard mast be insensitive to a proteded fran solids aoaandatian, ternperatrae variations a surface foaming and mast be capable of being ready calibrated Wastewater serrating equipment mast obtain flow propaiaed sarpes without dstating the concentration of arty waste constituent B. Row instrumentation neat include a weans fa dblmrining daily peak flaw rate and a rigid floe/totalizer reporting in ttnusatds of gallons and the totalizer mat not turn over more than anoe per year cluing the first year of installation. Representatives of the City of Spokane shall be pemritted access to the monitoring station at all times. The irdusby using the monitoring facility shall maintain its eoorracy and good waning order. If the equipment becomes inoperable, the user stall provide a wastewater report as desaited in Section 3 .01.040. Section 3.01.060. A Sewerage user Barges established an the basis of wastewater volumes calculated upon City water meter readrgs shall be adjusted on request to refled water volumes consumed m the property of the customer for tmigation, evaporation equipment, steam equipment product additions or other similar consumptive water uses, that do not contribute wastewater loafing to the municipal icipal sewage collection and treatment system, as fdlows: B. Meters of a design approved in coordration with the Director and Department of Water & Hydroelectric Services may be installed by the user for the pupose of ai the volume of water consumption to establish actual wastewater loadngto the nanidpel sewage u lledbonand treatmerd system to detemine the proper sewage user charge. Each amount may be assessed an addtietal forty percent of basic savior charges per mete. Meter installations used to determine actual wastewater loadings of the mridpal sewage treatment and cdledtm system mast be approved by the Director. Effective Jauay 1, 195.9, all new commercial and Industrial users will be allowed volume dsmu ts, only when a separate approved water meter is provided at the awnels e>perse to quarry the actual vdune not discharging to the sewer (lawn stairidmB). A \ D: \ BILLING \BE WERIrrLBIL C. The water meta mat be a positive dspla:erre d meter with a dgital dal totalizer rearing in trndreds of cubic feet. The totalize mat not hen over more than ance per year doing the first year of installation. The equipment of pbarbing fdlaving a water realer used for wastewater flaw redaction mat not ordain overflows ar valves that can discharge to the sanitary sewer system The City shell be penritted access to the premises fa meter rearing and codmdmg that the water use is as stated by the user. D. Upon written request, at subject to the approval of the Director, the volume of wastewater loafing g of the municipal sewage collection and trealnant system for any specific user may be dete r fined on the basis of the average of the anouus of water consumed per month by the user doing a five month period cormendng on the date of a water meter rearing in the nnrdh of November and caduring on the date of a water meter rearing in the fdlaving month of April, With average shall be oorrpuded atrraly after the water meter rearing in April of each suoceedng year. Sedan 3.01. 070. Each industrial user shall provide an approved wastewater mnnttatng access to its wastewater streams) ahead of the point of entering the public sewer system and dowrsbeem of all pants drainage tritons. Section 101.080. Commercial users expected a deter fined to dsdargewasteweters with BOD, SSandfor Pconcentrations greater than the range established fa standard wastewater sbatgth, or wastewater mmaring any 01 the materials fisted in Section 5 01 020, shall also provide an approved wastewater monitoring access to its wastewater strean(s) ahead of the point of anteing the public sewer system and downstream of all plait drainage inflow. The City shall be parrtitted amens to the wastewater monitoring poird(s). Seim 101.090. The Director shall be empowered to require installa- tion and maintenance at the user's expense ofwastewater flow mmitcnng equdpmerd and proportional flow sampling equipment where wastewater taring cannot be reasonably detenrined. The City of Spokane stall be given compete amass to all such equipment Section 101.110. Users notified to install Bow monitoring and sampling equipnard shaft have 180 days to install the equipment or have the City of Spokane castad for installation of the equipment and bill to user for the installation. Sed ion 3.01. 120. My conrrerdal and industrial user initiating a dsdnage a increasing the rate of discharge of wastewater or poldants, who is *thin the definition of Section 3.01.040 of this section, shall receive approval prior to intafim of a increase of sari c isdtage. Section 4. New Ancarts. Rates and charges for comrnerdal and industrial users cmtmendng to receive service from the wastewater treatment system shall be charged for volume of flow as a standard wastewater bad pus surcharges based upon a report of expected wastewater daracteistics which shall be submitted by the prospective use and approved by the Director prior to dsdharge of wastewater. Sertort 5. per. The City of Spokane Pretreatment Pragam requirements are now codified in SMC Ch 13.03, Article IV. Sedion 6 Section 6.01.010. All measurements, tests and analyses of the characteristics of wastewaters to detemine wastewater loafing and/or whether or not the established Iinits fa standard wastewater are exceeded shall be made as prescribed in the latest edition of "Standard Methods for the Exaninalion of Water and Sewage," a pu dicetim of the American Public Health Association, Inc Sedim 6.01. 020. All measurements, tests, analyses and reports amepted by the City of Spokane shall be performed by laboratories or persons approved by the Director. Section 6.01.030. A The City of Spokane shall monitor the wastewater from industrial users discharging process wastewaters and commercial users expelled or determined to discharge wastewaters with greater cona6Wertt strength than the range for standard strength wastewaters a constituents listed in SMC Chapter 13.03 Article IV to determine the flow and wastewater strength and suitability for treatment at a frequency determined adequate by the Director. B. The results of this rtnnitaing shall be used to assess representative wastewater charges or to assure that no wastewater load gdwgeshave corned since the last billing rate adustment. The scheduled frequency for monitoring each user or group of uses shall be available for correla- tion by the public C. Industrial and/or commercial users who feel that more frequent monitoring would be desirable may monitor more frequently and submit reports for the Director's use in assessing charges. The monitoring and reports shall comply with this ordnance and shall be at the rue's expense. Senior 6.01. 040. Results of monitoring shall be public information, and records thereof shall be open to public ecarrinatim rpm request to the Director unless the individual user requests otherwise and deserts an affidavit that release of such information would allow others to determine therefrom information regardng proprietary processes or operations. Sed ion 7. @dustnrnts of O1araes. The Director will review user charges and revise them periotLcally to reflect actual treatrred works operation and maintenance costs. Charges for each billing period well be detemined based on wastewater flaw and on approved wastewater strength mnritairg. Sedim 8. Orders. A The Director shall be authorized to issue an order prohibiting fur0er discharge into the mttiapal sewerage system to any user who refuses to oorrply with the provisions of these re,ulatias or w deemed necessary to protect the pudic health and safety. Uses may appeal to the Director for an aduutmaht in user charge, such an appeal mat be made Within thirty (30) days of the billing under dispute. B. In the event that City-dderrrired wastewater strengths and/or flows are challenged, an appeal mat be accompanied by or be fdlowed within thirty (30) days by a report based upon sarrples and tests perfumed by an approved laboratory and/or engineer setting forth the flaws and/or A \o: \BILQwc\SE WERunLaa waste shegtts in dispute. Decisions of the Diredcr m appeals may be further appealed to the Manager of Engineering Services, whose decision is final. Section 9. Eersons &tied to Sewer Uses C iames. Every person to whom service is fiaristted by the sewage cdledion and treatment system of the City of Spokane. and every person to wham such service is available by said system of sewerage, as determined by the Director or applicable laws or regulations, shall be Merged for such service m the basis set forth herein. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Spokane this 18th day of December, 1995. MARILYN J. MONTGOMERY, City Gerk APPENDIX A BASIC SERVICE CHARGE 1. Cost of Storrs Mater and Infiltnticnllnflow Treatment: a Operation and Maintenance Cost b. Costs attributed to BCD, TSS & P c. Cast attributed to Vvastewrater Flow d. Domestic, Camerdal & Indus- trial Wastewater Flow e. InfiltratioMnflaw Waste- water Row f. Stamm VVater flow to Treatment Plant Total: 2. Infiltraticn/lnflow and Stan water Treatment Cost of Stamsvater and InfilbatioMnfiow Collection: a Collection System Operating and Maintenance Cost b. Domestic, Commercial & Indus- trial Wastewater Flow c. Infittratia✓trrflow Wastewater Flax d. Total Stamwater Flow to the Sewer System Total: 3. Infiltration/Inflow and Stomp Collection Cost Total Amual Infiltratim/lnflow and Storm/rater Cost Cost for Customer Service BASIC SERVICE COST: Cost per Use Accent (62,000) System Improvement State B&O Tax (2.13%) Utility Tax 17% TOTAL BASIC SERVICE CHARGE Cost to gross utility component Utility Tax 17% State B&0 Tax 2.13% Cost reduction for additional apartments Cost per Apartment Total Basic Service Charge k \D: \BULING \SEWTRUILBD. Cost $ 5,642,744 $1,068,938 $ 4,573.806 8,210 MgaVyr 3,317 MgaVyr 905 Mgauyr 12,432 Mgal/yr $ 3,045,840 8210 Mgaiyr 3,317 MgaVyr 905 MgaYyr 12,432 MgaVyr $ 1,034,390 $ 2,587,669 $ 2,836,625 $ 5,424,315 $ 84.75 $ 6.77 $ 3.72 $ 29.68 $ 124.92 yr 10.41 rro $ 1 933,440 $ 242,560 $ 4.80yr $ 120.12 yr $ 10.01 urn APPENDIX B I. USER CHARGE User Charge for Treatment of Standard Strength Vlastewater. a Flaw Treatment Costs $ b. Flow Cdlectim Costs $ c. Total Flaw Costs $ d BOO 210 nrgl x $0.012/1b $ e. SS 170 ngrl x $0.0234b $ f.P124rrgnlx$0.3764b $ Total User Charge (Standard Strength VVastewrater) $ or $ II. TREATMENT PLANT OPERATING a. VVages & Personnel Services b. Cherriral: 1. Phosp aus removal 2. Sludge Dewatering (pdr ) 3. Chorine & Sulfur Dioxide c. Power: 1. BOO Removal 2 Suspended Solids 3. Other d. Supplies, Lab, Grease, etc. e. Equipment Maintenance/Parts f. Insurance g. General and Miscellaneous h. Capital Changes i. Sludge Disposal j. Total k Cost Attributed to Artiste- water Flow I. Cost/N61. Gal. @ 12,432 MgaVyr m Costs Attributed to BOO: n. CostAb @ 19.7 NObyr o. Costs Attributed to TSS: p. Cost/lb @ 17.8 Mb/yr q. Costs Attributed to R r. Costib @ 664,000 Ibyr 111. UNIT COLLECTION SYSTEM COSTS Collection System O&M Costs A anal Wastewater Flows Unit Cost COSTS $3,650,000 $ 300,000 $ 251,904 $ 76,000 $ 646,350 $ 297,967 $ 229,066 $ 119,316 $ 141,017 $ 116,736 $ 75,290 $ 161,628 $ 190,000 $ 33,819 $5,642,744 $4,573,806 $ 367.91 $ 297,967 $ 0.015 $ 480,970 $ 0.027 $ 290,000 • $ 0.437 $3.045,840 12,432 MgaVyr $ 245.00 367.91/Mgal 245.0fllgal 612.91M1gal 26.49MIgal 38.69Mlgal 45.2NMgal 72328/Mgal 0.54/100 CuFt 1. DOMESTIC USER CHARGE a. 73,000 gyr x $707.94/Mgal b. Basic Cost per Account c. Total Domestic Charge or Cost for addtional epartrrents: Basic Cost/Unit User Charge Total 2. COMMERCIAL USER CHARGE Flaw Treatment Casts Flow Collection Costs Flow Share System Improvement Total Row Costs BOD 8.94 Mlbs/yr @ $0.0201b TSS 7.39 Mlbsyr @ $0.03411b P 0.52 Mlbs/yr @ $0.5991b Total or 3. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM OPERATING CO STS Labor F&rirustration Industrial Monitaing Laboratay Analysis Direct Costs Overhead Total Wastewater Volume Charge Rate/Unit BOD Charge Rate/Unit TSS Charge Rate/Unit PO4-P Charge Rate/Unit APPENDIX C AAD:\ BILLING \SEWERVn.BD. 52.120 yr 124.92 yr 177.72 r 14.81 nn 120.12 yr 52.80 yr 172.92 yr 14.41 rro 376.95 251.02 99.18 727.16 49.18 65.97 75.96 918.26?v1gaI 0.6869/100 Cu Ft $157,002 $ 41,059 $ 56,155 $ 59,788 $ 46,000 $ 67,100 $ 270,102 $ 62,123 $ 15.07 $ 67,526 $ 0.0076 $ 70,227 $ 0.0095 $ 70.227 $ 0.1622 1. NON -CITY RETAIL DOMESTIC USER CHARGE a 73.000 9Nr x $707.94 b. Basic Cost per Account c. Oversize Fund d. Total Darestic Charge or Basic CastNnit User Charge Total or 2. NON-CITY RETAIL COMMERCIAL USER CHARGE Row Treatment Costs Flaw Cdlectan Costs Cost for I/I Total Flaw Costs BCD 8.94 Mlbs/yr @ 0.020Ab TSS 7.39 Mlbs/yr @ 0.034/lb P 0.52 Mlbs/yr @ 0.5991b Oversize Fund Total SEPTAGE CHARGE RATE or APPENDIX D APPENDIX E User Charge: 1000 gall= x user dwge/Mgal BOD 167 lb @ 0.020/lb TSS 334 lb @ 0.034/lb PO4 10 lb @ 0.5931b Adniristrative & Service Charges Utility Tax 17% TOTAL SEPTAGE CHARGE RATE Sudwge on loads > 4000 gallons TOTAL SEPTAGE CHARGE RATE (LOADS > 4000 Gallons) $ 5280 yr. $ 124.92 yr. $ 47.44 $ 225.16 yr. $ 18.76 urn. $ 120.12 yr. $ 52.80 yr. $ 220.36 yr. $ 18.36 mo. $ 376.95 $ 251.02 $ 157.61 $ 785.58 $ 49.18 $ 65.97 $ 75.96 $ 320.64 $ 1297.33/Mgal $ 0.9704/1000uFt $ 0.92/1000 gal $ 3.79/1000 gal $ 12.29/1000 gal $ 5.99/1000 gal $ 2299/1000 gal $ 15.80/1000 gal $ 7.95/1000 gal $ 46.74/1000 gal $ 5.00/1000 gal $ 51.74/1000 gal OUTSIDE CITY UTILITY SERVICE AREA (e cepl by Irdertc al Agree- ment) Flan Treatment Costs Interceptor and Ray Cdledicn Cost 181 /O&M Impact Management BOD 8.94 Mlbs/yr @ $0.0204b TSS 7.39 Mlbs/yr @ $0.03411b P 0.52 Mlbs/yr @ $0.599 Total Flow 8 Treatment Costs Basic Accent Adninistratian Program Rehabilitation & Replacement TOTAL Ray Treatment Cost Row Cdledion Costs TOTAL Sz9LLal$ 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 a LANDFILL PUMP AND TREAT User Charge: 1000 gallon: X user $ Laboratory/Process QA $ Administrative & Service Charges: $ State 680 Tax (1.98%) $ Utility Tax (17%) $ TOTAL NON - DOMES11C PROCESS WASTEWATER DISPOSAL CHARGE $ Surcharge our toads >4030 gallants $ TOTAL NON-DOMESTIC PROCESS WASTEWATER DISPOSAL CHARGE >4000 gal $ or APPENDIX F APPENDIX G NON- COMESIIC PROCESS WASTEWATER USER CHARGE APPENDIX H APPENDIX 0.92 20.96 15.91 1.00 7.95 MISCELLANEOUS RATES: 1. CESSPOOL PUMP AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES k:wnata.rvG\SEWERtm.sa. $ 376.95 $ 120.94 $ 139.25 $ 49.18 $ 65.97 $ 75.98 $ 828.25 $ 353.45 $ 461.08 $1642.78IMgal . $ 12288/100 Cu Ft 46.74/1000 gal 5.00'1000 gal 51.74/1000 gal $ 376.95MIGal $ 251.02/MGaI $ 627.98IMGat $ 0.4697/100 CuFt BASIC CHARGF $ 113.59 128.64 143.82 158.90 174.10 189.22 19678 204.35 211.93 219.47 227.06 2. ADDRIONAL LABOR CHARGES a 2 men @ 1 Nu purging b. 2 men @ 1 has no purging 3 SPECIALIZED LABOR CHARGES a Repair Cray 1 her 2 ran crew b. Repair Crew 1 her 3 mar crew c Raker Crew 1 her 2 men aew d. Vacall CB Crew 1 hour 2 nr e. T.V. Cniv 1 hour 3 men f. Cesspool Crow 1 hour + prrpng charge g. Cesspool Crew 1 hour no pumping charge h. Hydro Cleaner 1 her 2 men r. Baddwe 1 hour +labor j. 4 inch pump 1 her + labor k. 6 inch pump 1 her + labor $ 64.70 $ 96.63 $109.75 $128.34 $107.94 $12123 $145.61 $ 64.70 $ 96.63 $117.94 $ 39.95 $ 23.96 $ 31.92 Above rates in effect during normal business hors. Service at other times subject to overtime rates @ 1.5 x normal labor charges. 4. EQUIPMENT HOURLY CHARGES a. Repair Tnric Naas used 1 b. Dtarp Trudc hours used 1 c. Pidap hours used 1 d. Tads Truck hours used 1 e. Cargressor hors used 1 f. 1'% inch purp Noes used 1 g. 4 inch pump hours used 1 h. 6 inch pump hers used 1 i. Badduoe hors used 1 j. T.V. hoes used 1 k. Vaaatl CB deaners Noss used 1 I. Cesspool book Naas used 1 m. Sewer 'odder hours used 1 n. Hydro deaer hours used 1 o. Budoat ma: ices hors used 1 $ 31.92 $ 31.92 $ 26.62 $ 31.92 $ 22.62 $ 13.33 $ 23.96 $ 31.92 $ 39.95 $ 46.57 $ 53.24 $ 31.92 $ 39.95 $ 53.24 $ 26.62 5. MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES FOR LABORATORY ANALYSIS a BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS Feral Cddam $ 35.00 b. CNIEMISTRY TESTS Alkalinity Bicarbonate Carbonate Total Biaienid Oxygen Demand CHOide CNenid Oxygen Demand Dissolved C aygen Fluoride He c ess Nitrogen ARrrmta TI04 Nitrate Mrbite $ 14.13 $ 14.13 $ 27.41 $ 31.67 $ 9.87 $ 29.28 $ 23.58 $ 14.13 $ 13.71 $ 26.47 $ 27.41 $ 5295 $ 23.58 $ 15.58 t 00 8 Grease PH Phosphorus Inorganic Othopuspttate Total Residue Sett Sdids Coliform Suspended Sdids Total Sdids Total Dissdved Sdids Vdatile Sdids Vol. Suspended Sdids Spedfic Conductance Specific Oxygen Demand Sutfates Turbidity b. ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS PERFORMED BY ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROPHOTONIETRY (1) ICAP TECHNIQUE Aluminum Caldron Cadmium Chrordun Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Meraay Nickel Potassiun Sodium Znc (2) FLAMELESS TECHNIQUE Same elements as above 6. SLUDGE APPUCATION PROGRAM Sludge hauling and spreading Sludge incorporation APPENDIX J REFUSE DUMPSTER MAINTENANCE CHARGE Flow Treatment Costs Flow Cdledion Costs Flan Share System Improvement Total Row Costs BOD TSS P Annal Inspection TOTAL Inspection Fee nnm\aw ING SEWeakm.aa $ 39.67 $ 6.55 , $ 22.64 $ 16.51 $ 2264 $ 11.75 $35.00 $ 14.13 $ 15.58 $ 15.58 $19.32 $ 19.32 $ 7.83 $ 59.08 $ 2026 $ 11.75 $ 9c $ 9.43 $ 9.43 $ 9.43 $ 9.43 $ 9.43 $ 9.43 $ 9.43 $ 9.43 $ 9.43 $ 9.43 $ 9.43 $ 9.43 $ 9.43 $ 18.86 eadt $18.00/acte $17.90facte $ 4.67 $ 3.11 $ 1.11 $ 8.90 $ 8.94 Mlbslyr @ $0.02311b $ 0.61 $ 7.39 IMbs/yr @ $0.037/1b $ 0.82 $ 0.52 Mlbsyr @ $0.5991b $ 0.94 $30.00 $4127/yr $ 3.44/mo $ 0.0309/100 cult $80.00 (start up, one time fee) 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 F Q(Y1/2 CONTRACT: E/I R /'l? COMPACTION TEST DATA 1 - 7" METMOD M . BLOWS PERLAYER7$ NO. LAVERS 4 TAMPER WT. 37916 1 DROP HT. MOLD DIA. l� � VOLUME OF SAMPLE 4 1r //h 117,4 7,6 123 17.6 724 /4.4 WGT. OF WET SOIL e. MOLD Qf WGT. OF MOLD 4r WGT. OF WET SOIL gt W UNI W IGH w/q� MOISTURE E SAMPLE NO. WGT. OF WET SOIL A.DIS$ r WGT OF DRY SOIL fi -WSlgf WGT OF WATER qt - WST.rOF -13 WGT OF DRY SOIL Rf MOISTURE 9' CONTENT DRY UNIT WEIGHT /bM MECHANICAL ANALYSIS RETAINED #4 47 %PASSING #4 Z 1.4 136.4 1176.£5 1(S4.2 (I&5 7 1049.8 1049.g 1049,5 127, 0 136,4 1, 9 1270 117.0 136,4 136.9 6,4 10.2 11. 11y,4 S 122,5 1194 173.5 122,5 _ SAMPLE I GRAVEL SAND 1 FINES 53 SOIL CLASSIFICATION: CSI G OPT. MOISTURE CONTENT TESTED BY CHE 4 /4? MAX. DRY OENSITY DATE 13641 Y ATE JO N a -Z9 -s Gnr%149 5 10 15 20 25 30 MOISTURE CONTENT — %OF DRY WEIGHT 35 40 STA: EIleflPt?fl 3` /add 45 so cr Project: [UN eel) 3 / 10 1 (1 Sf Material: S rs j G LAB NO. CORE NO. C. WGT IN WATER - B. WGT SAT. SURF. DRY A. WGT OF OVEN DRY SAMPLE A = CALC BULK SP GR = B —C SP -1 WGT /CU FT. = BULK SP GR X 62.2= A. WGT OF DRY MAT B. WGT OF PYE + H 0 2 A +B= 2 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CORES DETERMINATION OF % AIR VOIDS W.S.T.D. TEST METHOD NO. 706A (METHOD C) W.S.T.D. TEST METHOD 705A (68 ° ) 52,1,3 /422,7 C. WGT OF PYE + H 0 + MAT 1771,9 (794. Date: 7/2,8 /K9 Contract: EA L, 14 LAB NO. CORE NO. C. WGT IN WATER B. WGT SAT. SURF. DRY A. WGT OF OVEN DRY SAMPLE A= CALC BULK SP GR = B —C WGT /CU FT. = BULK SP GR X 62.2= A. WGT OF DRY MAT B. WGT OF PYE + H 0 2 A +B= C. WGT OF PYE + H 0 + MAT 2 A +B —C 195.1 A +B —C RICE SP GR = A = 7,6> RICE SP GR = A = A +B —C A +B —C RICE SP GR X 62.2 =MAX WGT /CU FT /4/- ( l RICE SP GR X 62.2 =MAX WGT /CU FT % AIR VOIDS =100X1 —BULK SP GR= % AIR VOIDS =100X1 —BULK SP GR= RICE SP GR RICE SP GR Contractor Personnel Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 Diary Section m 1 2 3 4 5 6 INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE Number DAILY INSPECTION REPO ofd OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COU Y E► INEER / Date 6 2 Project Na e Inspect Project No. CRP /RI s Weather a.m. p.m. Report No. Time Charged Contractor this Day - ' /2or1 Copjract ij prand /. Sub(s) VM Other County Personnel 6 i�� ■ slfrat At Equipment List / Hrs. Used Standby cz ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION Signing checked a m LOCATION UNITS QTY. QTY. TO DATE INT. Spokane County Engineers N. 811 Jefferson 456 -3600 Spokane, WA 99201 Project: Job No.: Disc.No.: File Name: TYPICAL SECTION DATA 08- Aug -89 Roadway half width ENTER - -> 24 08:55 PM Road Name ENTER - -> Evergreen Road Left or Right ENTER - -> Curb Type TYPE B COUNTY Station Interval ENTER --> MINIMUM MAXIMUM Curb EL. Curb EL. Edge Pave. CENTER X SLOPE EDGE DIST. X SLOPE EDGE DIST FROM ( -4.5X ( -2X to Gutter LINE CENTER- PAVEMENT C/L TO C/L TO PAVEMENT EDGE PVMT.from E/P + FROM E/P + SELECT- Design Top Curb STATION ELEVATION LINE ELEVATION E/P EDGE PAVE X SLOPE TO CURB CURB HGT) CURB HGT) ED ELEV X GRADE X Grade 1735.02 51.32 51.11 10.90 -1.93 0.00 13.10 50.97 51.26 51.11 -3.32 1750.00 51.69 2.47 51.59 10.90 -0.92 3.20 13.10 51.45 51.74 51.55 -3.66 2.94 1800.00 53.19 3.00 53.10 10.90 -0.83 3.02 13.10 52.96 53.25 53.10 -3.32 3.10 1850.00 54.72 3.03 54.64 10.90 -0.73 3.05 13.10 54.50 54.79 54.79 -2.03 3.38 1885.09 55.64 2.62 55.54 11.00 -0.91 2.56 13.00 55.41 55.70 55.70 -1.96 2.59 1900.00 55.95 2.08 55.77 11.00 -1.64 1.54 13.00 55.64 55.93 55.85 -2.65 1.01 1950.00 56.77 1.64 56.68 11.00 -0.82 1.82 13.00 56.55 56.84 56.70 -3.17 1.70 2000.00 57.58 1.62 57.46 10.50 -1.14 1.56 13.50 57.31 57.61 57.60 -2.04 1.80 2035.09 58.46 2.51 58.38 10.70 -0.75 2.62 13.30 58.23 58.53 58.30 -3.94 1.99 2050.00 58.91 3.02 58.80 10.50 -1.05 2.82 13.50 58.64 58.95 58.70 -4.04 2.68 2100.00 60.73 3.64 60.53 10.50 -1.90 3.46 13.50 60.38 60.68 60.40 -4.29 3.40 2150.00 62.83 4.20 62.58 11.30 -2.21 4.10 12.70 62.46 62.74 62.60 -3.26 4.40 2200.00 64.82 3.98 64.67 11.50 -1.30 4.18 12.50 64.56 64.84 64.60 -4.14 4.00 CURB DROP CALCULATIONS Curb Drop Depression (Inches) Standard Curb Drop Length 2 Project: 4 Date: 1l-Aug -89 06:29 AM 208 Upstream Length sub Impervious Gutter Flow Required basin Area O Slope 7/n Depth Da/La D /(Oa /La) A2 11200 0.82 0.008 2250 0.16 0.109 7.50 D 3500 0.26 0.01 1004.016 0.13 0.1 2.56 TO: MATERIALS LABORATORY FROM: atALLS test County Road Name(s) Drilling request FUNCTIONAL CLASS Major Arterial Secondary Arterial Collector - Arterial Access Road Private Road . SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE Typical Cross Section Determination Please furnish ,K tahilometer R values for the soils on the following project: RI!) CP.P /PLAT No. /4i L Sec. 2 (, Twp. r7 - R. .q7_ —_.__ Ever -nee -, 4ejRF • . (See attached section map) ROAD NAME. R VALUES LOCATION Drainage - Percolation greater than 72 " /hr. yes_ No Est. Remarks* * Please note any unusual characteristics of soils and /or topography. Are the soils suit- able for the use of drywells? Are there any unusual drainage considerations? ROAD NAME FUNCTIONAL CLASS TRAFFIC INDEX These are guideline traffic indexes only. necessary to calculate individual traffic FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 5 • f - 1 actual Dat Traffic dot.+ indexes. • Act. TRAFFIC INDEX ** pInland Engineering South 25 Altamont Spokane, Washington 509 535-1410 99202 TO: 5POKAn1E 1oUt.cri �NUINEEIZ N. 911 TEFFER5onl SAoKF}^►E WA. 9924.o PROJECT: 5. 2 (0I5 EVEt26REEnl RoF}lj ATTENTION: C ARZ-1 NELSoni Gentlemen: We are sending ( ) enclosed ( ) under separate cover copies of the following: Description /. Blueline Prints / / Copy of Letter / / / / Original Drawing / / Contract Documents / / / / Work Authorization /port / / No. Copies Date Description eig1229CaPickthi fCPORT Requested Action Remarks Sincerely, INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. Transmittal DATE: AuUi_k `-} / / Information /✓f Review & Comments / / Distribution / / Written Approval / / Signature & Return / / Pt CA5 . RF■I i - . v./ km CA-u... 1 V \-1 o Lk 14 \t F 1411 LI Q urES i t o+.l S , 6190 DRAINAGE REPORT Evergreen Road - S. 2615 Evergreen Road Prepared hv: Inland Pacific Engineering Co. S. 25 Altamont St. Spokane, Washington 99202 (509)- 535 -1410 This drainage report will demonstrate the adequacy of proposed drainage structures to dispose of runoff from a ten -year design storm for a section of Evergreen Road. The site consists of a single family residence on approximately 1/2 acre. It is located on Evergreen Road south of 26th avenue, between Evergreen Point First and Third Additions in Section 26, T.25 N„ R.44 E.W.M. The east side of Evergreen Road is to be improved by constructing approximately 150 linear feet of curb and sidewalk on the east side of the street and paving between the curb and existing pavement. Iri accordance with County policy concerning improvements to short sections of public roads in the Aquifer Sensitive Area, no provisions for '208' treatment have been made. Sheet 76 of the Soil Survey of Spokane County. Washington shows that the soil on the site is SxB (Springdale gravelly loam, 0 to 20% sideslopes). fWp The basin consists of approximately 34-50 sq. ft. of paving and sidewalk with a runoff coefficient o d and approximately 5958 -sq. ft. of lot area with a runoff coefficient of .25. (See basin map) The weighted runoff coefficient is ,4-9 and the total area is approximately, -9 sq. ft. or . acres, By inspection, the time of concentration for the basin c i s less than five minutes. Therefore, the intensity is 3,18 and the ten -year design flow equals ..(3.18)(. 7) = .34 cfs. 0 A Type ":£ drywell with a capacity of .._0 cfs will be used to dispose of the storm runoff. According to the grate calculations on the next page, one Type 1 Metal Frame & Grate will intercept 7-3-% of the flow or ,cfs. The remaining .09 cfs will flow along the gutter line into Evergreen Point First Addition. 4 l c.f.i.. 3 c•f4. aoa.1 x ,ct 'f' 5913-1 of 2S y2o - s c dO (14Ls -F6 00 RECEIVED AUG 4 1989 County E ng i neer' / '(lo,o°1D( 30 2 '000 - 1 z— .5� ya 59 � a3jn �� .31 Grate Calculations Given: •40 Q = .34 cfs S = .03 n = .0160 Z = 48 From figure 18 of Guidelines, depth of flow d = .089ft. w = Zd = 3 -84 ft. V = Q/A = .340/(.5)(3;44)(.08) = 2.1 fps , '10 4.?2 ,c1 Check the length of the grate required L = V/2 (y +d) , y = .145 = .4S ft < 1.7 ft. - grate is long Check the width of the grate width = 1.44/ - = .36 or 38% From figure 15, % flow intercepted = 7-3% Ev8 CURBING OF EXISTING PPAVING TYPE '8' CURB STREET: Evergreen Road DATE: 8/2/89 PROJECT: S. 2615 Evergreen BY: SPS 1/2 PAVING WIDTH 24.00 FIELD INFORMATION OFFICE CALCULATIONS STATION CL ELEV EP ELEV CL GRADE DISTANCE CROSS 1/2 PW- MIN CURB MAX CURB PROPOSED GRADE CL TO EP SLOPE DIST CL EP -4.57, -28 CURB EL 1735.02 51.32 51.11 0.02470 1750.00 51.69 51.54 0.03000 1800.00 53,19 53.10 0.03060 1850.00 54,72 54.64 0.02622 1885,09 55,64 55.54 0.02079 1900.00 55 95 55.77 0.01640 1950.00 56.77 56.68 0.01620 2000.00 57.58 57.46 0.02508 2035.09 58.46 58.38 0.03018 2050.00 58.91 58.80 0.03640 2100.00 60.73 60.53 0,04200 2150.00 62.83 62.58 0.03980 2200.00 64.82 64.67 0.03240 2250.00 66,44 66.28 0 .03000 2300.00 67.44 67.70 0,02920 2350.00 69.40 69.19 0.02160 2400.00 70.48 70.33 0,02459 2430.09 71,22 70.96 0.03064 2450.00 71.83 71,53 0,04200 2500.00 73.93 73.79 0,02957 10.90 -0,014 11.60 50.97 51.26 51,11 10.90 -0.009 11.60 51.45 51.74 51,55 10.90 -0,008 11.60 52.96 53.25 53.10 10.90 -0.007 11.60 54.50 54.79 54.74 11.00 -0.009 11.50 55,41 55.70 55.70 11.00 -0.016 11.50 55.64 55.93 55.85 11.00 -0.008 11.50 56.55 56.84 56.70 10.50 - 0.011 12.00 57.31 57.61 57,60 10.70 -0.007 11.80 58.23 58.53 58.30 10.50 - 0.010 12.00 58.65 58.95 58.70 10.50 -0.014 12.00 60.38 60.68 60.40 11.30 -0.022 11.20 62.46 62.74 62.60 11.50 -0.013 11.00 64.56 64.84 64.60 11.40 -0.014 11.10 66.17 66.44 66.30 11.00 -0.022 11.50 67.57 67,86 67.80 11.20 - 0.019 11.30 69.07 69.35 69.20 11.70 -0.013 10,80 70,23 70.50 70.40 11.40 -0.023 11.10 70.85 71.12 71.00 11.50 -0.026 11.00 71.42 71.70 71.60 12.00 - 0.012 10.50 73.70 73.47 73.75 0.02937 0.03100 0.03380 • 0.02593 0.01006 0.01700 0,01800 0.01995 0.02683 0.03400 0,04400 0.04000 0.03400 0.03000 0.02800 0.02400 0.01994 0.03014 0.04300 STATION 1735.02 1750.00 1800.00 1850.00 1885.09 1900.00 1950.00 2000.00 2035.04 2050.00 2100.00 2150,00 2200.00 2250.00 2300.00 2350.00 2400.00 2430.09 2450.00 2500.00 Prepared by: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING South 25 Altarnont Spokane,.WA 99202 (509)- 535 -1910 EVERGREEN POINT THIRD ADDITION STORM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS August 10, 1989 ( 15t RG4 t 3�ct4' ?URPOSF The purpose of this report is to determine the extent of storm drainage facilities which will be required to dispose of stormwater runoff created by the development of Evergreen Point Third Addition. The storm drainage facilities on this project will be designed to dispose of runoff from a ten year design storm. This development is within the Aquifer Sensitive Area and is subject to '208' requirements. ANALYSIS METHODOIOGY The Rational Method, which is recommended for basins less than ten acres in size, will be used to determine the peak discharges and runoff volumes. PROJECT DF.SCRTPTION Evergreen Point Third Addition is a 3.81 acre, 11 lot subdivision located east of Evergreen Road and north of 28th Avenue, in the SW 1/4 of Section 26, T 25 N, R 44 EWM. Sheet 76 of the Soil Survey of Spokane County, Washington. (copy attached) shows that the soil type is SxB (Springdale gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 20% sideslopes) which is somewhat excessively drained and has moderately rapid permeability. In the future developed condition, the subdivision will be divided into 7 basins, A through H, by the crowns and high points of the various road improvements. (see basin map attached) The runoff from the area to the south of Basin "E" has been accounted for in the drainage report of Evergreen Point First Addition. The runoff from the area to the east of Basins "G" and "H" will be included in the next development in that direction. Basins "A" and "B" include the most probable development of Bolivar Court to ensure that 'there is adequate '208' and drywell capacity when the next phase is completed. 2 CAT40[1T•AT10NS The total Basin areas and the Basin impervious areas used to calculate stormwater runoff are as follows: BASIN TOTAL AREA IMPERVIOUS AREA SR. FT. ACRES SQ.FT. ACRES A 68,360 1.570 15,127 .347 B 70,340 1.615 9,260 .213 C 14,670 .337 1,850 .043 D 7,812 .179 3,900 .090 E 21,548 .495 6,378 .146 F 22,058 .506 5,440 .125 G 26,000 .600 5,422 .125 H 8,200 .188 1,722 .040 3 BASIN A Peak Flow Calculation, Total Area = 1.570 acres, Impervious area = .347 acres C9se. 1 110 ft. overland flow Tc = 3.57 min, by equation 3 -2 of the Guidelines 275 ft. gutter flow Assume d = .20 ft. from Figure 18 of Guidelines, Q = 3.66 cfs => Tc = .90 min. _> I(5.00) = 3.18 => Q(c) =1.25 cfs Q > Q(c) , try d = .135 ft. Q = 1.28 cfs => Tc = 1.17 min. _> I(5.00) = 3.18 => Q(c) =1.25 cfs Qpeak = .25(3.18)(1.570) = 1.25 cfs for Case 1 Case 2 C(t) = .15 (overland flow) L = 110 ft. n = .4 (average grass) S = .05 Z = 36 n = .016 S = .045 280 ft. gutter flow Z = 36 n = .016 S = .02 (asphalt paving) (asphalt paving) Assume d = .20 ft. from Figure 18 of Guidelines, Q = 2.44 cfs => Tc = 1.38 min. _> I(5.00) = 3.18 => Q(c) =.99 cfs Q > Q(c) , try d = .14 ft. Q = .99 cfs => Tc = 1.73 min. _> I(5.00) = 3.18 => Q(c) =.99 cfs Qpeak = .90(3.18)(.347) _ .99 cfs for Case 2 Therefore Qpeak for Basin "A" is 1.25 cfs. 4 Since the time of concentration for Basin "A" is less than five minutes, it is safe to say that by inspection each of the times of concentration for the basins in this development are less than five minutes. Thus, the peak flow can be readily calculated by comparing the peak flow calculated using the two Rational formulas below and using the higher value. Qpeak = .25(3.18)(total basin area), or Qpeak = .90(3.18)(basin impervious area) whichever is greater. The following shows the basin areas and their respective peak flows. BASIN TOTAL Qpeak IMPERVIOUS Qpeak AREA (total) AREA (imp) A 1.570 1.25 .347 .99 1.25 B 1.615 1.28 .213 .61 1.28 C .337 .27 .043 .12 .27 D .179 .14 .090 .26 .26 E .495 .39 .146 ..42 .42 F .506 .40 .125 .36 .40 G .600 .47 .125 .36 .47 H .188 .15 .040 .11 .15 Q DRYWELLS Basins A and F The combined peak runoff from Basins A and E will be disposed of in a type "B" drywell in Pond A attached to a catch basin in Pond E as shown on the plans. See attached Bowstring calculations. Basin R The peak runoff from Basin B will be disposed of in a Type "B" drywell. See attached Bowstring calculations. Rasing C and 11 Basins C and H are small basins with peak flows of .27 and .15 cfs respectively. The runoff from these two basins will temporarily be disposed of in two Rock Sumps as shown on the plans. The flow will be picked up in the next phase to the east of this development where '208' storage will be provided. Basin D The peak runoff from Basin D, .26 cfs, will be disposed of in a Type "A" drywell with a capacity of .30 cfs. See attached Bowstring calculations. Basins F and G The combined peak runoff of .87 cfs from Basins F and G will be disposed of in a type "B" drywell in Pond G connected to a catch basin in Pond F as shown on the plans. See attached Bowstring calculations. CORR DROPS AND TNT,FTS It is necessary to check the adequacy of curb drops and curb inlets provided to divert the flows from the gutter to the "208' ponds. The Curb Drop Calculation Sheet included in this report shows the required lengths of curb openings. The curb drops in Ponds A1,B and E are in sump condition. A 4 foot long curb drop in sump condition can handle up to 4 cfs which is more than adequate to divert the flows into Ponds Al, B and E. As shown on' the Curb Drop Calculation Sheet, Pond A2 requires a curb opening of 7.53 feet. Therefore, two 4 foot curb drops have been provided. Likewise for Ponds F and G. Pond D, where the special curb inlets will be used, requires a curb opening of 2.54 feet. Therefore, two 2 foot long special curb inlets have been provided. 6 BOWSTRING METHOD BEJENTION BASIN DEEPEN Tie incr5nent fain) Tic Li of Ccnc. (Lin) 5 gutflosi 0,1 ion Veit' Flew Area facres} 1,57 ineeryioue (eq. ft-) 15127 'CY Fitter Area 'C' 0,333/ Tie TilIE! inc. Intensity 0. Develoet Vol, in Vol, Out Etereee kin.) (59:.) (inlisr.) (c.f..} icu. ft.) (co, ft,) (cu. 15.) po 600 3,15 1,25 502 50 422 500 3,16 1.25 502 30 472 10 300 2.24 0.83 317 60 557 15 900 1.77 0,6i 536 90 606 2U 1200 ,,-,... 0,57 741 120 621 25 1500 1,21 0,17 761 150 611 30 1000 1.04 0.41 776 100 596 35 2100 0.51 0.36 735 210 576 40 2400 0.32 0.52 905 240 565 45 2700 0.74 0.22 211 270 544 50 1000 0,33 0.27 023 300 522 55 3300 0.51 0.25 655 330 525 60 1600 0.61 0.24 0E6 360 525 6.5 3F00 0,50 0,24 3S0 70 4200 0,53 0.23 979 420 55i 75 4500 0.51 0c22 1012 450 552 BO 4300 0,53 0.21 1.020 430 540 65 5100 0.52 0.10 10i2 510 552 SO 544 0,50 0,20 1030 540 540 95 5700 0.49 0,i9 1116 570 546 10 6000 0.48 0.17 ilf 500 550 ' 20:4 ' DINhE 2 CALCULATIONS Required '203' Sterage V:'1u7.e (S in. depth). iiipETVIOUS 15127 Bo. : 4 5,4 .5 in / 12 in./t. 200' Storage Volume Provider DWELL REDUIEEMENTS - 10 YEAS DESIGN STCFM Maxiau. Ster;q5 Volue.9 Required by 'Bowstrin Nupter aed Ty:e. of Drywalls Required Froject: EV9FOreEP 3r1 A Beedgner: SFS Date: 8/9/23 41 342 Cu, Ft, Cu, Ft, 0 Typ9 'A' 0 Type '6' el l ib . S CC y frrfr *° „ r -% ° ‘ ;fti BOWSTRING METHDO DETENTION BASIN Ti2E increment .in) Tic? Qi CNC. (Gin) 5 uti104 (C,f.5, ) 0.4 DEsign VHF F1C14 10 ArEa (acres) 1.615 Inpervieue (sq. ft.) 5210 0 Factor Area i 'C' 0,404 Project: Baain: Deeigner: ate: Evergreen • are 11/9/19 Time Ti gIR In:. Intensity g Developd Vol. in Vol. Out Storage (oin.) (sec.) (e.t.a.) (cu. ft.) (cu. It.) (cu. ft.) 5,00 300 3.18 1.28 516 336 5 300 3,13 1.28 516 120 396 10 600 2,24 . 0.90 635 240 395 15 900 1.77 0.71 715 360 356 20 1200 1.45 0.59 762 420 222 25 1500 1.21 0.43 781 600 183 30 1800 1,04 0.42 739 770 79 35 2100 0,91 0.37 809 840 -31 40 2 400 0.22 0.35 1 310 -132 45 2200 0.74 0.30 132 1010 -243 50 3000 0,s8 0.27 SU 1200 -343 , 3300 0.64 0.26 279 1320 -441 , 60 3600 0.61 0.25 912 1440 -521 65 3900 0.60 0.24 965 1560 -591 70 4200 0.58 0.23 1007 1190 -673 75 4500 0.56 0.23 1041 1800 -257 80 4800 0.53 0.21 1049 19 -871 65 5100 0.52 0.21 1052 • 2040 -941 50 5400 0.50 0,20 1111 2150 -1049 95 5700 • 0.49 . 0.20 114E: 2280 -1132 100 6000 0:48 0.19 1145 2100 -1217 '206 DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Required '208' Storage Values (6 in, depth). pervious 7210 1q. Ft.t .5 in / 12 in./ft. 208' Storage Voluoe Provided. DRWELL REQUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM Maximum Storage Voitioe Required by 'Bowstring'. Number and Type of Drywelis Required ii46 Cu. Ft. 7 _ Cu. Ft. 1 Type 'A' Type '1' DOWSTRINE METHOD Protect: Everoreon 3rd DETENTION BASIN DESIGN Time Increment (min) 5 7I? of Conc. (min) 5 Outflow (.2 , f , a.) 0.1 Design Yesr Flow 10 Area. (acree) 0.495 t-- ipporvioue (eq, fti) 13784- 'C' Factor f4fEi t 'C 0.124 maaih: r OmeiJuer) EFS 'Sate; 9/9155 Time TiE! Inc. Intenoity 6 Develood Vol. In Vol. Ct Etorago (ooc.) (in/hr,) t:.f.s.) (cu. ft.) (:12. ft.) (:u. ft.) 5,00 300 3.18 0.39 15 30 1 5 500 3.12 0,39 159 30 12E 10 600 2.24 0. 195 60 '" 15 900 1,77 0 415' 50 129 20 1200 1.45 0.12 234 120 114 25 1500 1,21 0.15 240 150 90 30 1900 1.04 0.15 245 1E1 65 35 2100 0.91 0.1 242 210 32 40 5410 0.22 0,10 254 241 14 45 5 700 0.74 0.05 21 270 -13 50 3000 0.62 0,02 261 501 -39 55 3300 0.64 0.02 225 530 -61 60 3200 0.61 0.09 279 321 -21 65 5310 0,60 0.07 257 39) -33 70 4200 0.53 0,07 505 420 -111 75 4510 0.56 0,07 319 450 -131 20 4210 0.53 0.07 322 421 -152 95 5100 0.52 0,06 335 510 -175 91 5400 as 0.0(' 340 540 - 200 25 5700 - 0.49 0.16 352 570 -218 100 6000 0,41 0.06 362 600 -232 202' DRAINA98 FOND CALCULATIONS Required 202' Storage YDIUME in, dootn). INperviouo E.573 Sq. Ft,t .5 in /12 in./ft. '202' Storage Volume Provided= DRYWELL REDUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN ETORM Maximum Storaoe Volume Required by 'Eowstring'. Num'cor and Type of Drywolls Required 0J, ME Cu. Ft.:2' eA 273 Cu. Ft. 0 Type 'A' 0 Type 'Et' BOWSTRING METHOD DETENTION BASIN DESIGN Time Increment (min) Time of brc. (min) Outflow (c.f.s,) 0.5 Design Year Flow 1 Area (acres) 0.504✓ impervious (sq. ft.) 5440 // 'C Factor • 0,25 Area i 'C' 0,127 Project: Evergreen 3rd Basin: F Designer: SPS Date: 617/89 TiOe iio_ Lrc. titei:::ty O Deveicpd Vol, Ia Vol. Out Storage (min.) (sec.) (in /hr.) (c.f.s.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) 5.00 300 3.19 0,40 162 90 72 5 300 5 0,40 162 90 72 10 • 600 2.24 0.298 199 180 19 15 900 1.77 0.22 224 270 -46 20 1200 1.45 0.13 239 360 -121 25 1500 1.21 0.15 245 450 -205 30 1900 1.04 0.13 250 540 -290 35 2100 0.31 0.12 253 430 377 40 2400 0.82 0.10 260 720 -460 45 2700 0.74 0.09 262 810 -548 50 3000 0.63 0.07 267 .900 -533 55 3300 0.64 0.08 275 990 -715 60 3600 0.11 0.08 286 1030 -794 65 3900 0:40 0.08 304 1170 -866 70 4200 0.53 0.07 316 1260 -944 75 4500 0.56 0.07. 326 1350 -1024 80 4800 0.53 0.07 329 1440 -1111 85 5100 0.52 0.07 342 1530 -1188 90 5400 0.50 0.066 348 1620 -1272 95 5700 0.4 0.06 360 1710 -1350 100 6000 • 0.48 0.06 371 1800 -1429 1< '203' DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS : 1 vw fequired 208' Storage Volume (6 in. depth)= r- impervious v 5 D 440 Eq. Ft.i .5 in / 12 in. /ft. v227 Cu. Ft. w / ,ate 4a- '203' Storage Volume Provided= . X30 Cu. Ft. DRYWELL REQUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM Maximum Storage Volume Required by 'Bowstring '= Number and Type of Drywells Required 72 Cu. Ft. V 1 Type 'A' 0 Type '8' BOWSTRING METHOD DETENTION BASIN DESIGN Time Increment (rein) 5 Time of Conc. (min) 5 Outflow (c.f.s,) 0.3 Design Year Flow 10 Area (acres) 0.6 Impervious (sq. ft.) 5422 / 'C' Factor 0.25 Area t 'C' 0.150 Project: Evergreen 3rd Basin: Designer: SFS Date: 6/7/89 Time Time Inc. Intensity 2 Deve;cpd Vol. In Vol. Out Storage (min.) (sec.) (in /hr.) (c.f.s.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) 5.00 300 3.18 0.48 172 90 102 300 3.18 0.43 192 90 102 10 600 2.24 0.34 236 130 55 15 900 1,77 0.27 246 270 -4 20 1200 1.45 0.22 283 360 -77 25 1500 1.21 0.18 291 450 -159 30 1800 1.04 0.16 297 540 -243 35 2100 0.91 0.14 301 630 -329 40 2400 0.82 0.12 308 720 -412 45 2700 0.74 0.11 311 810 -499 50 3000 0.68 0.10 316 900 -584 55 3300 0.64 0,10 327 990 -663 60 3600 0.61 0.09 337 1030 -741 65 3900 0.60 0.09 360 1170 -310 70 4200 0.58 0,09 374 1260 -886 75 4500 0.56 0.08 587 1350 -963 80 4800 0.53 0.08 370 1440 -1050 85 5100 0.52 0.08 406 1530 -1124 90 5400 0.50 0.08 413 1620 -1207 95 5700 0.49 0.07 426 1710 -1284 100 6000 0.48 0.07 439 1800 -1361 '208' DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Required '208' Storage Volume (6 in. depth)= Impervious 5422 Sq. Ft.; .5 in / 12 in, /ft. '208' Storage Vnluoe Provided= DRYWELL REQUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM Noxious Storage Volume Required by 'Bowstring'= Nuaber and Type of Orywells Required 124 Cu. Ft. )Cu. Ft. 10 Cu. Ft. 1 Type 'A' 0 Type '8' i ei Tyr - Roc K S &ti^P CAI -`.tk L- ATlcK1 _ E-v To V2ovIDE pc-r- LEAS% , 2_17 C.-1 S C.APAcI (/ me _ . C . }�-g_Co_Ano4 C'rE = 7Z Iry I H>z. tARF Acc A E,� = i l7. L 14.171. - - e C IA. Sn.C, ACET. AREA = I75 / q F-r" _GA PRe...m..=_ kZ. - l - 5tectn-P l 12 u Date: August 11,1989 Designer: gsn Basin: e Project Name: Description: evergreen point third Sub Area #: 1 0.495 Acres Total Area: Overland Flew Values Ct: 0.150 L.: 50.000 N: 0.300 S: 0.020 Computed Values Dur: 110: 010: 2.463 3.1E30 0.394 Rational Formula Hydrology Runoff Coefficient: 0.495 Acres Composite Runoff Coefficient: 0.250 0.250 Date: August 11,1989 Project Name: evergreen) point third Description: Bowstring Computations Designer: gsn Basin: e t t Intensity ODev VIn VOut Storage (min.) (sec.) (in/hr) (cfs) (cf) (cf) (cf) 5.0 * 300 3.18 0.39 158 30 128 10.0 600 2.:24 0.28 195 60 135 15.0 900 • 1.77 0.22 215 90 129 20.0 1200 1.45 0.18 234 120 114 25.0 1500 1.21 0.15 240 150 90 30.0 1800 1.04 0.13 245 180 65 35.0 2100 0.91 0.11 248 210 38 40.0 2400 0.82 0.10 254 240 14 45.0 2700 0.74 0.09 257 270 -13 50.0 3000 0.68 0.08 261 300 -39 55.0 3300 0.64 0.08 269 330 -61 60.0 3600 0.61 0.08 279 360 -81 65.0 3900 0.59 0.07 295 390 -95 70.0 4200 0.58 0.07 309 420 -111 ' 75.0 4500 0.55 0.07 316 450 -134 80.0 4800 0.53 0.07 022 480 -158 85.0 5100 0.51 0.06 332 510 -178 90.0 5400 0.50 0.06 340 540 -200 95.0 5700 0.48 0.06 348 570 -222 100.0 6000 0.47 0.06 355 600 -245 The Maximum Storage is: 135 cf The time of concentration is: 5 minutes The undeveloped flow out is: 0.10 cfs Ten Year Storm Calculation Date: August 11,1989 Designer: gsn Basin: f Project Name: Description: evergreen point third Sub Area #: 1 0.506 Acres Total Area: Overland Flow Values Ct: L: N: S: Dur: I10: 010: 0.150 50.000 0. 300 0.020 Computed Values 2.463 3.180 0.402 0.506 Acres Composite Runoff Coefficient: Rational Formula Hydrology Runoff Coefficient: 0.250 0.250 Date: August 11,1989 Project Name: evergreen point third Description: Bowstring Computations Designer: gsn Basin: f t t Intensity ODev VIn VOut Storage (min.) (sec.) (in /hr) (cfs) (cf) (cf) (cf) 5.0 * 300 3.18 0.40 162 90 72 10.0 600 2.24 0.28 199 180 19 15.0 900 1.77 0.22 224 270 -46 20.0 1200 1.45 0.18 239 360 -121 25.0 1500 1.21 0.15 245 450 -205 30.0 1800 1.04 0.13 250 540 -290 35.0 2100 0.91 0.12 253 630 -377 40.0 2400 0.82 0.10 260 720 . -460 45.0 2700 0.74 0.09 262 810 -548 50. 0 3000 0.68 0. 09 267 900 -633 55.0 3300 0.64 0.08 275 990 -715 60.0 3600 0.61 0.08 286 1080 -794 65.0 3900 0.59 0.08 301 1170 -869 70.0 4200 0.58 0.07 316 1260 -944 75.0 4500 0.55 0.07 323 1350 -1027 80.0 4800, 0.53 0.07 329 1440 -1111 85.0 5100 0.51 0.07 339 1530 -1191 90.0 5400 0.50 0.06 348 1620 - 1272 95.0 5700 0.48 0.06 356 1710 -1354 100.0 6000 0.47 0.06 363 1800 -1437 The Maximum Storage is: 72 cf The time of concentration is: 5 minutes The undeveloped flow out is: 0.30 cfs Ten Year Storm Calculation Date: August 11,1989 Designer: qsn Project Name: Description: evergreen point third Sub Area #: 1 0.600 Acres Total Area: Overland Flaw Values Ct: L: N: S: 0.150 30.000 0.300 0.020 Computed Values Dur: I10: 010: 2.463 3.180 0.477 Rational Formula Hydrology Basin: q Runoff Coefficient: 0.600 Acres Composite Runoff Coefficient: 0.250 0. 250 Date: August 11,1989 Project Name: evergreen point third Description: Bowstring Computations Designer: gsn Basin: g t t Intensity ODev VIn VOut Storage (min.) (sec.) (in /hr) (cfs) (cf) (cf) (cf) 5.0 * 300 3.18 0.48 192 90 102 10.0 600 2.24 0.34 236 180 56 15.0 900 1.77 0.27 266 270 -4 20.0 1200 1.45 0.22 283 360 -77 25.0 1500 1.21 0.18 291 450 -159 30.0 1800 1.04 0.16 297 540 -243 35.0 2100 0.91 0.14 301 630 -329 40.0 2400 0.82 0.12 308 720 -412 45.0 2700 0.74 0.11 311 810 -499 50.0 3000 0.68 0.10 316 900 -584 55.0 3300 0.64 0.10 327 990 -663 60.0 3600 0.61 0.09 339 1080 -741 65.0 3900 0.59 0.09 357 1170 -813 70.0 4200 0.58 0.09 374 1260 -886 75.0 4500 0.55 0.'08 383 1350 -967 80.0 4800 0.53 0.08 390 1440 -1050 85.0 5100 0.51 0.08 402 1530 -1128 90.0 5400 0.50 0.07 413 1620 -1207 95.0 5700 0.48 0.07' 422 1710 -1288 100.0 6000 0.47 0.07 430 1800 -1370 The Maximum Storage is: 102 cf The time of concentration is: 5 minutes The undeveloped flow out is: 0.30 cfs Ten Year Storm Calculation CURB DROP CALCULATIONS Curb Drop Depression (Inches) Standard Curb Drop Length (Ft): 203 Sub -Basin NOTES Curb Drop R/L Station Al - A2 25th 1+05 L NCR C N/A D Evergreen 15+76 R 25th 1+73 R 6noiivar 17 +41 L 6 Bolivar 17 +43 R N/A Al 42 R C D t c 6 cop Gutter Peak Slope Flow S 1.25 0.008 0.016 0.0278 36 1.28 0.27 0.26 0,010 0.016 0.0830 12 0.42 0.40 0.010 0,016 0,0272 36 0.47 0.010 0.016 0.0776 36 0.15 ttralculated per Figure 18 of Guidelines t t SCalculated per Figure 16 of Guidelines ttfiA 4 foot curb drop with a 6 inch deep gutter '2088' FOND C ALCULATIGNS 203' Street/ Sub -Sasin Station MER /flog 25th 1+05 L NC:R 1337 N/A 6/,350 Evergreen 18+76 R .4900 26th 1+73 F. 4726 Bolivar 17+41'L ,./5440 Bolivar 17+43 P /5427 NiA '7172 v .S ? ?, 3 "a � 3 ;A-r 181.3 64.0 343.0 0.0 234.? 0.0 77,1 0.0 162,5 0.0 265,8 0.0 226.7 0.0 0.6 Face 1 2.0, Project: Evergreen Feint Third Addition 4,0 Date: /8/9/85 Rouohne =_ "gCro =_s Reciprocal e[et, Slope CrossSlope n 7 1 /ri has a capacity of 4,0 cfs in Hop condition. Upstream Carryover Arcumui. Pond 202' Carryover R/L Impervious Storage Storage Storage Type/ Storage - to Area Req't Req't Req't Sad rrc'_ = d Downstream Remarks 245.3 20•226' 343,0 10'x25 254.9 20'x28' 77,1 Rock 'Sung 152.5 20'x15'. /A3 R 20x24' 226.7 20'x20 225.7 20'x70' 71,2 Rock Sump rye 3, , '"`! °t• K3 i e. 924 2 248.20 0.12 2245,20 0.12 0.020 0.025 784.0 2 ?0.0 0,0 176.3 277.0 230.0 Flow Length Depth • Required bit Oa /Lath O /(Oa /La marks :ump Condition tttt 2242.20 0,16 0.105 1 :ump Condition ittt i ./eaporary Rock Sump 0.1 .2 2.54 , Cress slope of E.5k for type 3 curb L Sumn Condition Mt 5.03 5.51 i Temporary Rock Sump U 2-V F 0.0 54.0 0.0 77.1 (,0 0.0 0.0 71.8 b »+ r- cn /Lc w• -0... -Hese 1, w ors Z - 753 .J o y Date: August 11,1989 Project Name: Description: evergreen third add Sub Area #: 1 1.570 Acres Total Area: Overland Flow Values Ct: L.: N: S: 0.150 50.000 0.300 0.0'20 Computed Values Du r: I10: 010: 2.463 3.180 1.248 Rational Formula Hydrology Designer: gsn Basin: a Runoff Coefficient: 1.570 Acres Composite Runoff Coefficient: 0.250 0.250 Date: August 11,1989 Project Name: evergreen point 3rd Description: The time of concentration is: Bowstring Computations Designer: qsn Basin: a t t Intensity ODev VIn VOut Storage (min.) (sec.) (in /hr) (cfs) (cf) (cf) (cf) 5.0 * 300 3. 18 1.25 502 30 472 10.0 600 2.24 0.88 617 60 557 15.0 900 1.77 0.69 6 90 606 20.0 1200 1.45 0.57 741 120 ' 621 25.0 1500 1.21 0.47 761 150 611 30.0 1800 1.04 0.41 776 180 596 35.0 2100 0.91 0.36 786 210 576 40.0 2400 0.82 0.32 805 :240 565 45.0 2700 0.74 0.29 814 270 544 50.0 3000 0.68 0.27 828 300 528 55.0 3300 0.64 0.25 855 330 525 60.0 3600 0.61 0.24 886 360 526 65.0 3900 0.59 0.23 935 390 545 70.0 4200 0.58 0.23 979 420 559 55 CI 75.0 4500 0.55 0;22 1002 450 CC -. JJi 80.0 4800 0.53 0.21 1020 480 540 85.0 5100 0.51 0.20 1052 510 542 90.0 5400 0.50 0.20 1080 540 540 95.0 5700 0.48 0.19 1104 570 534 100.0 6000 0.47 0.18 1126 600 526 The Maximum. Storage is: 621 cf 5 minutes The undeveloped flow out is: 0.10 cfs Ten Year Storm Calculation Date: August 11,1989 Pt-eject Name: Description: evergreen point 3rd Sub Area #: 1 1.615 Acres Total Area: Overland Flow Values Ct: L: N: S: 0.150 50. 000 0.300 0.020 Computed Values Du r: I10i 010: 2.463 3.180 1.284 Rational Formula Hydrology Designer: gsn Basin: b Runoff Coefficient: 1.615 Acres Composite Runoff Coefficient: 0.250 0. 2.50 Date: August 11,1989 Project Name: evergreen point 3rd Description: Bowstring Computations Designer: qsn Basin: b t t Intensity DDev VIn VOut Storage (min.) (sec.) (in /hr) (cfs) (cf) (cf) (cf) 5.0 * 300 3.18 1.28 516 120 396 10.0 600 2.24 0.90 635 240 395 15.0 900 1.77 0.71 716 360 356 20.0 1200 1.45 0.59 762 480 282 25.0 15(0) 1.21 0. 49 783 600 183 30.0 1800 1.04 0.42 799 7:20 79 35.0 2100 0.91 0.37 809 840 -31 40.0 2400 0.82 0.33 828 960 -132 45.0 2700 0.74 0.30 837 1 080 -243 50.0 3000 0.68 0.27 852 1200 -348 55.0 3300 0.64 0.26 879 1320 -441 60.0 3600 0.61 0.25 912 1440 -528 65.0 3900 0.59 0.24 961 1560 -599 70.0 4200 0.58 0.23 1007 1680 -673 75.0 4500 0.55 0.22 1031 1800 -769 80.0 4800 0.53 0.21 1049 1920 -871 85.0 5100 0.51 0.21 1082 2040 -958 90.0 5400 0.50 0.20 1111 2160 -1049 95.0 5700 0.48 0.20 1136 2280 -1144 100.0 6000 0.47 0.19 1158 2400 •-1242 The Maximum Storage is: 396 cf The time of concentration is: 5 minutes The undeveloped flow out is: 0.40 cfs P R O F I L E 15 +00 PI L= 0.000 L/H Pt.= 0.000 r' 0 Grade = = 7.000"/. 15 +00 41.560 41.560 15+25 41.2.37 43.310 15 +50 44.750 45.060 15 +75 46.113 46.910 16 +0O 47.320 48.560 16 +25 48. 70 50.310 16 +25 PI L= 250.000 L/H Pt.= 51.439 r.' 17 +82.258 Grade= .8007. 16 +25 48.373 50.310 16i -50 49. 50.510 16+75 50.013 50.710 17 +00 50.600 50.910 17 +25 51.033 51.110 17 +50 51.310 17 +75 51.510 51.510 18 +00 51.80B 51.710 18+25 52.300 51.910 10 +25 PI L= 100.000 L/H Pt.= 51.407 r2 17 +49.359 Grade= 3.9207. 18 +25 52.300 51.910 18 +50 52.988 52.890 18 +75 53.870 19 +00 54.850 54.850 19 +25 55.770 55.830 19 +50 56.570 56.810 19 +50 PI L= 100.000 L/H Pt.= 58.847 r' 21 +03.942 Grade= 1.998% 19++50 56.570 56.810 19+75 57. 249 57.309 20 +00 57.809 20 +25 58.308 20 +25 58.308 20 +25 PI L= 0.000 L/H Pt.= 0,000 r' 0 Grade= CREST VERTICLE CURVE_„ CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE 4 #1 = 7 GRADE 4 #2 = .8 DESIGN SPEED 30 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) 172.312739192 LENGTH OF VERTICL CURVE (GIVEN) 250 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 198.09830508 SAG VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE 4 #1 = .8 GRADE 4#2 = 3.92 DESIGN SPEED 30 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) 46.468383307 LENGTH OF VERTICLE /CURVE (GIVEN) - 100 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 198.89830508 CREST VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE 4 #1 = 1.92 GRADE *2 = 1.99788459278 DESIGN SPEED 30 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) - 329.527043117 LENGTH OF VERTICLE /CURVE (GIVEN) 100 nTOPKI T9 1 LPnrre � . /\ y PROF ILE 20+35.09 PI L= 0.000 L/H Pt.= 0.000 @ 0 Grade= 2.003% 20+35"09 57.260 20+50 57^559 20+75 58.059 58.059 21+00 58.747 58.560 21+00 PI L= 50'000 L/H Pt.= 57.724 @ 20+41.498 Grade= 4.992% 21+00 50.747 58.560 21+25 59.808 21+50 61.056 21+50 61.056 21+50 PI L= 0.000 L/H Pt.= 0"000 @ 0 Grade= SAG VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = 2.00277307041 GRADE #2 = 4.99183154838 DESIGN SPEED 30 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) 31.077766799 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 50 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 198.89830508 �-/-�| �� (/D/ ,� Avg. P RnFTLE 0+00 PI L= 0.000 L/H Pt.= 0.000 0 Grade= -^800% 0+00 58.460 0+50 58.060 1+00 57"660 1+50 57.260 57.260 1+75 PI L= 50,000 L/H Pt.= 57"171 T 1+72"222 Grade= 1.000% 1+75 57.173 57.060 2+00 57"310 2+50 57.810 3+00 58.310 3+50 58.482 58,810 3+50 ' PI L= 100^000 L/H Pt.= 58.510 @ 3+65 Grade- -1.500% 3+50 58"357 58.810 4+00 58.060 4+00 58"060 4+00 PI L= 0"000 L/H Ft.= 0.000 @ 0 Grade= SAG VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = -.8 GRADE #2 = 1 DESIGN SPEED 30 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -211.172316384 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 50 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 198.89830508 CREST VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = 1 GRADE #2 = -1.5 DESIGN SPEED 30 LENGTH . OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -161,40338984 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 100 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 198"89830508 Polo Tro: in+ Ted Gm met Tiloskea-- le: SP- eel ,0 uc•tict,thecie 1124 ao Jn ofkArt otAAA.. M tkk ctA \TA cestt fr.sak1 9 AL‘. 40. 6;0 t4m4 ck.... ?sS kc 4 _dthrn#CYVVICeK, lAciocenotezhier. kkeyfeta..4. 01/4- conve-ttt±vt a r c It- I 0-4 lir ,fistines +La-. kivaca 01 eithwywait:ev, .ids-1143t clut.v•t kg_ t. I DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR May 22, 1996 A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR TO: Tom Mosher, Planner A5' FROM: Mark Holman, Assistant Building and Planning Director g g Attached find suggested revisions to portions of two sections of the '1724' procedural rules. The intent is to: 1) Bring the focus back to project permits' as addressed in the initial legislation; and, 2) Bring the Determination of Completeness back to what appears to me to be the intent of the legislation. The balance of Spokane County's '1724' will require further revisions. I believe if we focus on the legislation itself and apply what experience we are gaining, we will be able to put together our own 'model' rules which implement both the letter and spirit of the legislation. Your consideration is appreciated. MH:pjk Attachment c: James L. Manson, Director, Spokane County Division of Building & Planning John Mercer, Assistant Planning Director p.s. bold type = new language; regular type = existing language; 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 BUILDING PHONE: (509) 456 -3675 • FAX: (509) 456 -4703 PLANNING PHONE: (509) 456 -2205 • FAX: (509) 456 -2243 TDD: (5091 324 -3166 B. Definitions. Chapter E.S.H.B. 1724 PROCEDURAL ADMINISTRATIVE RULES .010 Purposeand- applicability Administration .020 Types of applications , .030 Optional consolidated project review process .040 Preapplication procedure .050 Determination of completeness .060 Notice of application and hearing notice for Type II and Type III applications and Type I and Type II appeals .070 Notice of decision .080 Appeal procedure .090 Severability .100 Conflicting ordinances and administrative rules .110 Effective date .010 PURPOSE -AND APPLICABILITY ADMINISTRATION A. Purpose and Applicabilityle. countyregulattions. This chapter describes how the county will process applications for `project permits' pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.70B. adopted her after. 1. Chapters 3.01 3.17 of Title 3 (buildings and structures) 2. Chapter 3.20 of Title 3 (Flood Damage Protection) 3. Title 1 (Spokane County Shoreline Program) 4. Title 9 (roads, bridges and drainage) 5. Title 12 (short subdivisions) 6. Title 13 (subdivisions) 8. Chapter 9. Chapter 10. Chapter (Critical Ards ordinance) (Stormwater Utility Ordinance) (Erosi n and Sediment Control Ordinance) 1. Fer purpeseTo€ hapter Applicant shall mean owner and designated contact. unless otherwise stated herein, 2. Project permit, or project permit application means any land use or environmental permit or license required from a review authority for a project action, including but not limited to building permits, subdivisions, binding site plans, planned unit developments, conditional uses, shoreline substantial development permits, site plan review, permits or approvals required by critical area ordinances, site - specific rezones authorized by a comprehensive plan or subarea plan, but excluding the adoption or amendment of a comprehensive plan, subarea plan, or development regulations (RCW 36.70B.020(4)). Chapter Printed June, 1996 Matrix of applications by type. The review authority may administratively adopt, and subsequently modify from time to time, a matrix of applications and procedures- project permits ' - tirne;by types for guidance as to which type-of processes set forth herein do or do not apply to various applications. . 1 • 13, C. Review authority and interpretations. } 1, • • - ., The review authority is generally the same as the responsible official pursuant to SEPA and the Spokane Environmental Ordinance. More specifically, the review authority is considered to be: a. The Director of the Division of Building and Planning of the Spokane County Public Works Department or designee (hereinafter called "building and planning director") , Zoning Code of Spokane County, (Critical Ards Ordinance), Code.for the provisions of those chapters or sections of the Spokane County Code under their administrative responsibility such as, but not limited to, those pertaining to building permits, subdivisions, binding site plans, planned unit developments, conditional uses, shoreline substantial development permits, permits or approvals required by critical area ordinances, or site - specific rezones. b. The Director of the Division of Engineering and Roads of the Spokane County Public Works Department or designee (hereinafter called "county engineer"), (Floo Damage Protection), Title 9 (roads, bridges and drainage), for the provisions of those chapters or sections of the Spokane County Code under their administrative responsibility such as, but not limited to, those pertaining to flood damage protection, roads, bridges, drainage or erosion and sediment control. c. The Director of the Division of Utilities of the Spokane County Public Works Department or designee (hereinafter called "utilities director"), shell - interpret for the provisions of those chapters or sections of the Spokane County Code under their administrative responsibility such as, but not limited to, those pertaining to the stormwater utility. d. The Director of the Public Works Department der- (hereinafter called "public works director") shall designate the review authority for an application for which it is not obvious which of the above should be the review authority. ES.H.B. 1724 Procedural PACE 2 OF 22 Administrative Rules 2. The review authority shall interprets and applyies applicable development regulations and the provisions of this procedural administrative rule as it relates to those regulations. .050 DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS A. Counter complete status. Chapter Printed June, 1996 of the application are identified as set forth in .050.A.1. u ... ..:.. ... . .. . .050.8 A. Within 28 days after receiving a project permit application, the review authority shall mail or provide in person a written determination to the applicant stating either that the application is complete; or, that the application is incomplete and what is necessary to make the application complete. To the extent known by the review authority, they shall identify other agencies of local, state, or federal governments that may have jurisdiction over some aspect of the application. B. A project permit application is complete for purposes of this section when it meets procedural submission requirements as discussed below and is sufficient E.S.H.B. 1724 Procedural PAGE 90F22 Administrative Rules Chapter Printed June, 1996 for continued processing even though additional information may be required or project modifications may be undertaken subsequently. The determination of completeness shall not preclude the local government from requesting additional information or studies either at the time of the notice of completeness or subsequently if new information is required sir substantial changes in the proposed action occur. C. An application shall be deemed complete under this section if the review authority does not provide a written determination to the applicant that the application is incomplete as provided above. Within 14 days after an applicant has submitted to a review authority additional information identified by the review authority as being necessary for a complete application, the local government shall notify the applicant whether the application is complete or what additional information is necessary. D. Procedural Submission Requirements. An application is considered to meet procedural submission requirements when: 1. It contains such information documents, plans or specifications as may be required for submission by law or ordinance; or, 2. It contains such information documents, plans or specifications as may be required by administrative policy of the review authority; or, 3. Where not otherwise defined, it includes: i. A legal description acceptable to the review authority, including its . source; and, ii If required, appropriate materials for any required public notification procedures; and, iii. If the application is subject to a design review or preapplication meeting based upon this code or administrative rule, ' sspiew " copy of the design review meeting information required by the preapplication procedure, including the appropriate fees and any applicable "Agreement to Pay Fees "; and, iv. Any applicable SEPA documents or review; and, v. Any other information requested by the review authority or required by ordinance. Relevant laws, ordinances and policies detailing complete application requirements are included as Appendix 1 of this Rule. 6-4. Applications abandoned or suspended for more than one (1) year, except as relieved by the review authority, shall be voided. Exceptions to voiding may be requested in writing by the applicant and may be granted by the review authority after consultation with other participating review authorities.. 5. Nothing herein shall prevent the review authority from accepting portions of an application for processing, provided they are :sufficient for continued processing and, further, provided that the time frames referenced herein shall not commence until such time as a determination of completeness has'' been issued. ES.H.B. 1724 Procedural PAGE 10 OF 22 Administrative Rules u ch :!ly eemplete-status. Chapter Printed June, 1996 1. "Technically complct 2. Bcforc accepting an appli ation for processing for a Typc I, II or III review, the .050.B). Twenty eight (28) calendar days is the maximum time frame Determination of Completeneso. application ( .050.B.5.c). meeting: PAGE 110F 22 E.S.H.B. 1724 Procedural Administrative Rules Chapter Printed June, 1996 4. An application is techn* upe c. The dccision regarding the technically complete status of an application, 5. If the review authority decides a Typc II, III or some Type IV appli ations are not technically complete, then within the time provided in .050.B.3 of this a. The statement shall specify that thc required missing information must be .050.B.5 is submitted by thc time specified by .050.B.5, then review-autherity-shall: applications; E.S.H.B. 1724 Procedural PAGE 12 OF 22 Administrative Rules c. for a Type II, III and some Type IV appliica Liens; _ d a ' Figin d date —of-a y hearing include: S.I. OF 28th AVENUE 8, EVERGREEN ROAD FND. 1/2 REBAR W/ YPC STAMPED "MOORE 18091" 1 456.59 POINT FIRST 0 N00' 43'00 "E ® 156.09 S86 20'55"W 50.15 /ADDITION co g O o 11') N' i 1 (3) a) z • 1 NOTE' A// Lots are Subject to 5' Wide Drainage Easements Reserved along A// Rear Lot Lines and Both Sides of All interior Lot Lines. See Dedication, DEDICATION A 4- 1 N BLOCK to O O a `- O a 26' z N - Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. N 0 0 Sri N 1 ddOUi\IT < \li\l \/1 = �N 1 37 o 1 1 1 N 80 0 0 87.50 3 87.50 150.00 p N 4S 0� 2 0 `- ' 522 S� if cn w O O T RACT 225 25 o a , t ci oO o. ° I 150.00 vE z NO0 ° 43'00 "E 80.00 70.00 A Ptn. Of O 0 0 N 10,320 SQ. FT. 4-- DRNG. ESMT. VERA DRNG. ESMT. 0 0 10,937 SQ. FT. rn co KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that ROY H. NYHOLM and MARIE E. NYHOLM, husband and wife; WESLEY B. ANDERSON and ALICE M. ANDERSON, husband and wife; and HAROLD G. ANDERSON, JR. have caused to be platted into Lots, Blocks, and Streets the land shown hereon, to be known as EVERGREEN POINT THIRD ADDITION and being a replat of portions of Tracts 210 and 225 of VERA, per final plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 30, in the Spokane County Auditor's Office, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 6 of EVERGREEN POINT FIRST ADDITION, per plat thereof recorded in Volume 18 of Plats, page 75, in said Auditor's Office; thence westerly along the northerly boundary of said Addition the following three (3) courses: (1) N.89 ° 17'00 "W. a distance of 125.00 feet; (2) S.86 ° 20'55 "W. a distance of 50.15 feet; (3) N.39 ° 17'00 "W. a distance of 129.00 feet; thence N.00 ° 43'00 "E. along a line parallel with the west line of said section a distance of 150.00 feet; thence N.89 ° 09'08 "W. along a line parallel with the south line of said Tract 225 a distance of 160.00 feet to the west line of said Tract 225; thence N.00 ° 43'00 "E. along said west line a distance of 270.05 feet; thence S.89 ° 17'00 "E. a distance of 329.00 feet; thence N.00 ° 43'00 "E. a distance of 30.00 feet; thence S.89 ° 17'00 "E. a distance of 85.00 feet; thence S.00 ° 43'00 "W. a distance of 175.00 feet; thence S.89 ° 17'00 "E. a distance of 50.00 feet; thence S.00 43'00 "W. a distance of 271.59 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 3.805 acres, more or less. And they do hereby dedicate to public use forever the streets and roads shown within this plat, including additional right of way for Evergreen Road as shown hereon. Lot 2, Block 11; and Lot 3, Block 12; being one -foot (1') wide strips as shown hereon, are hereby dedicated to Spokane County as general county property, to be dedicated for road purposes forever, at such time as the roads are continued as full width rights of way, or until adjacent lands are platted. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. Direct access from individual lots to Evergreen Road is hereby prohibited. NINE O 4 N 10 SQ. FT. 0 cn co Z 5'x IO' UTIL. 5 r ► EASEMENTS -r q- - 80.00- T BLOCK (BASIS OF BEARINGS) NOO' 43'00 'E EVERGREEN ROAD 150.00 N 0 0° 43'00 E 270.05 120•00 2 0) O O N 10 937 SQ. FT. O - 0 N00 " 43'00 "E 1 95.08 - 21� WIDE UTIL. ESMT. DRNG. 0 ESMT. 0 rn 11,699 SQ. FT. 0 O - rn CO Z S00 ° 43 "W 2 71.5 9 FouF<rH ADDITION 35 J � J J OW I C e 5'x I0' UTIL. ESMTS N00 43'00 "E 1 25.30 0 , 10,487 SO. FT. I 21.5\ 2 r o o) O M 1 U7 4019%„3,1 DRNG-- RNG- ' °° 35 ESMT. N00 0 43'00 "E 1 1 5.41 3 0 O 0 10, 878 SO. FT. 5' WIDE UTIL. ESMT. -95.41--- (> N N . BOLIVAR 298.50 ROAD N L - 87.50 - 76.59 5 5 y 5' x 10' UTIL. ESMTS.� EASEMENT 5' WIDE UTIL. CD I 0 11,988 S0. FT. TEN 87.50 96.59 0 lf) O O 0 0 ti • N 0 0 ti O rn m O z 0 0 0 25' 25' U" - 65.00 - 7 .5' WIDE UTIL. oitiri EASEMENT N - L - 0 -J oo - O O in La x O DRNG. in ESMTS. *----N 75.00- 27.5' N00 "E 1 20.00 N % 7 5.00 - - 0 L A I N I 29.5 ' `DRNG. ESMT I T ° • O t n O kid 0 0 (D x N in N I I O . J 0 F- E- 0 LLI I 3cn 95.00 N00 °43'00' 125.00 :z w ca) 2 0 (D �t N 2 w 0 O J 1- D co MM � C'J oa 10,625 SQ. FT. l r 51 I0' UTIL. ESMT. ) 125.00 S00 ° 43'00 "W 175.00 LOT 3, BLOCK 12 1' WIDE STRIP \ S 8,9° 17' 00" E 50.00 The public water system, pursuant to the WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot. Use of private welts and water systems is prohibited. Water service for this plat shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System plan for Spokane County, as amended. No more than one dwelling structure shall be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots, ownerships, or building sites without first filing a replat. WARNING: Until property to the south and east is subdivided, agricultural pursuits exist that may cause odors, dust, sprays and noise. Drainage easements in Lots 1, 2 and 5, Block 9; and Lot 3, Block 10; and Lot 1, Block 11; and Lot 1, Block 12, as platted and shown hereon, for the purpose of installing, operating, and maintaining drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted. The County of Spokane is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all drainage easements adjacent to the public rights -of -way. The property owner shall maintain the drainage swale with a permanent live cover of lawn turf which does not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage swale as indicated on the approved plans of adjacent streets. The property owner or his representative shall inform each succeeding purchaser of all drainage easements on the property and his responsibility for maintaining drainage facilities within said easements. Spokane County will maintain the drywells and culverts, as shown on the approved road plans, located in the easements. Easements for drainage are also reserved over a five foot (5') wide strip along each side of interior lot lines and over the rear five feet (5') of each lot. Within these easements, no structure, planting or other material shall be placed or permitted to remain which may change the direction of flow of drain- age channels in the easements, or which may obstruct or retard the flow of water through drainage channels in the easements. The easement of each lot and all improvements in it shall be maintained by the owner of the lot, except for those improvements for which a public authority or utility company is responsible. N Co W O O 0 0 0 co co co O 505.00 14' OF ADDITIONAL R/W FOR EVERGREEN ROAD W1/4 CORNER SECTION 26 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S CORNERS NOS. 1466 81 2629 . FND BRASS CAP 8& - R.P.' S PER FINAL PLAT OF EVERGREEN POINT LOT 2 , BLOCK _II 1' WIDE STRIP N 00 °43'00 "E 30.00 i , WESLEY B. Plan Pc FINAL PLAT aq44 OF EVERGREEN POINT' THIRD ADDITION BEING A REPEAT OF PTNS. OF TRACTS 210 AND 225 OF VERA IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 26, T. 25 N., R. 44 E.W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON JUNE 1989 - M. rrr 1. � ,... ALICE M. ANDERSON HAROLD G. ANDERSON, JR. SCALE: I = 50' LEGEND • Fnd. Monument per EVERGREEN POINT FIRST ADDITION (1/2" Rebar with Yellow Plastic Cap Stamped "MOORE 18091 ", unless otherwise noted) Set 1/2" Rebar with Yellow Plastic Cap Stamped "MOORE 18091" (unless Otherwise Noted) as: Angle Point in Boundary Centerline Monument Lot Corner NOTE: The BASIS OF BEARINGS for this Map is the Bearing of N.00 43'00 "E. on the West Line of the Southwest Quarter of Section 26 (Center- line of Evergreen), per MOUNTAIN VIEW FOURTH ADDITION NO CI C2 CHORD 28. 28 42. 43 DELTA 90'00' 00' 90'00' 00' RADIUS 20. 00 30. 00 LENGTH 31 . 42 47. 12 TAN 20. 00 30. 00 Inland Pacific Engineering Company South 25 Altamont Spokane, Washington 509 535-1410 • 99202 A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. The use of individual on -site sewage systems shall not be authorized. The Owners of Successors in interest agree to authorize the County to place their names on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owners' property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner's property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owners or Successors from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. Five foot by ten foot (5')(10') utility easements, as shown hereon, are hereby granted to Vera Water & Power District and U.S. West Communications. A five foot (5') wide utility easement adjacent to all public right of ways, as shown hereon, is hereby granted to Washington Water Power Co. and U.S. West Communications. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said ow �rs have hereunto set their hands and affixed their seal (if any) this /7 day of /4e; } , 19 F '717 /8 X71 ROY H. NYHOL'M i MARIE E. NYHOLM i This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. Examined and Examined and approved this Examined and day of !J COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Examined and approved this 11 'day of Examined and approved thi PP �4 day of 9 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE Patrick J. Moore, RLS Certificate Number 18091 COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT approved this '.a day of ENGINEER Director, Spokane County Utilities Spokane County Engineer COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT approved this ).q =` day of Auc� 1.a.5 ' Directo Departme COUNTY ASSESSOR COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY TREASURER . S"po.k'ane Court- y Planning GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. , 19 1 , 19 9 'for Spokane County Health Officer Spokane County Assessor by Deputy This plat was approved and accepted by the County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, on this 1 day of , 19 ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON) On this ' day of , ) ss 19', before me, the undersigned, a Notary COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared WESLEY B. ANDERSON and ALICE M. ANDERSON, husband and wife; ROY H. NYHOLM and MARIE E. NYHOLM, husband and wife; and HAROLD G. ANDERSON, JR., to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the said instrument as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Notary Public in and forithe State of Washington, residing at Spokane Spokane County Treasurer by Deputy Chairman, Spokane County Commissioners I do hereby certify that all taxes which have been levied and become chargeable against the land shown within this map have been fully paid this day of ,19' . Y//g/5/ %S /g/ I " :3tt1 AVt nut t 'E RI,itL -f:.N ki -. 1 ND 1i;� REE3AR W/ YF'.0 `.11 AMPED "MOORE 18091 r- r- r^ 1 r- 1- r \Ir' f< )fir r N 2 J POJ NT I FIRST 456.59 -' / N00 43'00 "E 1 56.09. S86 °20'55 "W 50.15 \GGITION J NO TE: A// Lots are Subject to 5' Wide Drainage Easements Reserved along A// Rear Lot Lines and Both Sides of A// /nterior Lot Lines. See Dedication_ co z co O 0 O O 0 o CP rn - z BLOCK 0 0 O , P ai ti 10,320 SQ. FT r-- 26' 80.00 N t) N TRACT 225` = N 0 U c0 150.00 �72 z NO0 °43'00 "E 80.00 BOLIVAR 87.50 ago 0 0 v N 2 4 6 0 c� A Ptn. Of } aP CO na., DRNG. c0 ESMT DRNG ESMT 3 37 VERA 10,937 SQ. FT. 0 150.00 p 87.50 87.50 N - FAIN /iE"iI FOURTH ADD 1 ON J 00 0 N N 1-- 70 0 0 NINE 4 O O 10,150 SQ. FT. z 5'x 10 UTIL. 5 / t EASEMENTS I - 80.00- N00 ° 43'00 "E 87.50 2 298.50 5' x10' UTIL. ESMTS.- O N 10 FT. 937 SQ. F BLOCK S00 ° 43'00 "W 2 71.5 9 I 150.00 (BASIS OF BEARINGS) N00 ° 43'00 "E 35 BL OCK I ONE NO0 °43'00 "E n I 95.08 ' \ � WIDE UTIL. ESMT. - 21 DRNG. I O ESMT. 11,699 SQ. FT. O O 0 O rn co z 5'x10' UTIL. ESMTS N00 ° 43'00 "E 1 25.30 10,487 SQ. FT. 2 ,�E - 2I 1 N 74 35. 44 D ESM 1 N00 ° 43'00 "E 0 0 LC> 0 10, 878 SO. FT. f 5' WIDE UTIL. ESMT. - 95.41 ROAD N 0 Lc) 11 ,988 SQ. FT. N 115.41 3 76.59 5' WIDE UTIL. EASEMENT TEN 9 6.5 9 10 I N O 0 L( 5 i�- O O L( 0 0 O • Y•• 0 > o rn 25' 25' 0 rn oo z 25' 0 O 34 EVERGREEN ROAD 2 70.05 120.00 505.00 O N 0 N ° rn co z 25' I Z /1.5' I O -_I > O r0 ' . A . co- j - W DRNG. in ESMTS. N 7 5.00 2 - 65.00 5' WIDE UTIL. EASEMENT 27.5' N00° 43 "E 1 20.00 \,-- I ,.- � 7 5.0 0 i., - � 5 ,, IN .{ 29.5 DRNG. 2 ESMT. w w ~J `� O > I � IS 0 o J . o Co x N in N 0 1- I•- Dz W 3 cn a to W 95.00 o w J J W of co ct to N N 00° 43' 00' 125.00 O 0 L( 1 0 O O m O) U) 2 10,625 SO. FT. 1 CO ( 5 1 x 10' UTIL. ESMT. - -) 1 25.00 O 0 07 LLI 0 0 O 0 t1') co S00 ° 43'00 "W 175.00 LOT 3, BLOCK 12 1' WIDE STRIP \ S89 °17'00 "E 50.00 14' OF ADDITIONAL R/W FOR EVERGREEN ROAD LOT 2, BLOCK I I 1' WIDE STRIP N 00 °43'00 "E 30.00 w O 0 L 60 co co 0 3 •S 17 it Li _tom � . � � 4 ✓ '�S ;Sr+ �'1 I i of f = tt r j. - r1". I it ,o''t;'f ' J i is ,, nq ' ' r . 1 id 1 : {' _ ,/ ;1:. t7 'C'• }l f; ! 1_ 1 r.tf:1 C i hi Ji t 11. • ; i . r S' W 1/4 CORNER SECTION 26 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S CORNERS NOS: 1466 & 2629 FND BRASS CAP & R.P. PER FINAL PLAT OF EVERGREEN POINT . .' EVERGREEN PSI T THIRD ADDITION BEING A REPLAT OF PTNS. OF TRACTS 210 AND 225 OF VERA IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 26, T.25 N., R.44 E.W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON JUNE 1989 i S1. ::� ,'�!1 i ; �; t ;0 , SCALE: 1" = 50' • r A')l,li:,'14 (I:/ .° ;teal if v th '�r�,t = ;.1s.s. i'l;l i. C d Y .1 1 )?r� t� 1 I :11.2 i n e! r �, tl ` .1 Stamp i_ {� 1 iOORE 13091" :J 0 91 �{!! i E n 1 • 0 Ari 1 1' ''diT >_ in Ti C.01'.1_ 11 i ;r,1i ! {til.. of ,`1,11[ • f7./ 1 •11 1 . 1 7. 'i1,1 .11.1 } } ._' r, • NO CI C2 CHORD 28. 28 42. 43 DELTA 90'00' 00" 90'00' 00" RADIUS 20. 00 30. 00 LENGTH 31 . 42 47. 12 TAN 20. 00 30. 00 Inland Pacific Engineering Company South 25 Altamont Spokane, Washington 509 535-1410 • ff_i lei -; /,i!L J .... t L ' - ,7. ,.1. i ':t 1� 1 I � ._ . �t Z , • 3 Y i_ I f t t - . t.. 1 _ 1 . } i • .1.,1,[,.1.; t ;H i;d + + "{::`i` ' p Jl.i ' i1 f�]f''i,ll�:A t ii„ 1 i �, t 3 ! i, • J ' i 1j . 11 `: .F' �r;i� I . i� i ?�?I, .f1 I J'�I� 'I:r-c{-,1 ` . ` . t , -. ( i(1 -1.. o .c: 1} .. ,(?J , '. .'} to R %I ac.f f3' • ....01 1 i;tl i I 1_ '.i r . 1 . � „ ▪ " ion 1 ::111 :;M .,. r . ti`f ' a r ,s LEG 7,`i1 - i 99202 t -11 1 i✓Lf FINAL PLAT OF srory 'AT. {l1:t i{I } f 'C 1 f t1 1'. of 1.h f` i;"'7 . !i_'? J O(1 i. - , i 1 s .1E JI j t:1i ? ' . RF C4VEO AUG 22 798 o* fliteeen ' • , -(i cc a S 6 l' "L., P . (�vt T11.;5 ii t G,, - tom 7 k e �o 9 a .�. a / ��- a sue' ^ I C S s cL>� s 5 v�o e_ei v� ` ` v S.I. OF 28th AVENUE 81 EVERGREEN ROAD FND. 1/2 REBAR W/ YPC STAMPED "MOORE 18091" 606.59 1 V RGR EICI '2 PO N T 1 I ' ( c�v FIRST O N00 ° 43'00 "E ® 1 56.09 S86 20' 55" W 50.15 O J oo LC N ° co NOTE A// Lots are Subject to 5' Wide Drainage Easements Reserved along A// Rear Lot Lines and Both Sides of A// /nterior Lot Lines. See Dedication, 80.00 0 o 5 O O ti C 10,320 S0. FT. (Ti BLOCK O Lri N 1\iI NTA1N V1 E W FOUR - PH \DD 1 ON U') J 7 A Ptn. Of TRACT: 225 VERA 1 50.00 N00 ° 43'00 "E DRNG ESMT 87.50 DRNG. ESMT. 3 10,937 SQ. FT. 87.50 o co ° O O O O ti co Z 5 Z CV J 0 70.00 NINE 4 N 10,150 SQ. FT 5 x 10 UTIL. 26 5, EASEMENTS _ - 80.00 - ---F � I -80.00 150.00 CO z O O L 0 0 L) N00 ° 43 "E 87.50 x10' UTIL. ESMTS. O O ti 2 O O 1_6 10,937 SQ. FT. BLOCK SOO ° 43'00 "W 271.59 ■ 00 Z J BLOCK (BASIS OF BEARINGS) N00 ° 43'00 "E N00° 43'00 "E 95.08 5' WIDE UTIL. ESMT. 1 11,699 SQ. FT. 5')(10' UTIL. ESMTS N00 ° 43'00 "E 1 25.30 I N• 21_5 2 ; O - I 4°\ DRNG.- =° 35. ESMT. N00 ° 43'00 "E 10,487 SQ. FT. 1 1 5.41 3 O O L o) 10,878 SQ. FT. / 5' WIDE UTIL. ESMT. ` - 95.41 -% N BOLIVAR 298.50 ROAD N 76.59 5' WIDE UTIL. EASEMENT- i O 11,988 SQ. FT. CV TEN 87.50 96.59 N 0 O O O ^ u J ti J �t O N r 0 EVERGREEN ROAD 270.05 1 20.00 I � 4- N O O O N 27.5 NO0 ° 43'00 "E 1 20.00 1 -I 29.5 DRNG. ESMT. 1 O O 0 0 25' d 25' 65.00 - 5' WIDE UTIL. EASEMENT I Z h1.5' W a -r 1 w O O _ I 00 .7 co O O roc W . Lf� CO - c2 W I O > O J O W 95.00 N 00°43' 00' 125.00 °0 co J 10,625 SQ. FT. 1 W 5 UTIL. ESMT. -;�.- ) 1 25.00 S00 °4300 "W 1 75.00 LOT 3, BLOCK 12 1' WIDE STRIP S89° 17 ' 00" E 50.00 JJ W CO o DRNG. \ in ESMTS . -75.00 in 75.00 N 1- L 2 cr c9 N O 0 O O O O h- V (1) 505. 0.0 14 OF ADDITIONAL R/W FOR EVERGREEN ROAD W I/4 CORNER SECTION 26 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S CORNERS NOS. 1466 84 2629 FND BRASS CAP 8 R.P.'S PER FINAL PLAT OF EVERGREEN POINT 0 O) co 2, BLOCK 11 I WIDE STRIP mW N 00 °43'00 "E 30.00 EVERGREEN POINT THIRD ADDITION BEING A REPLAT OF PTNS. OF TRACTS 210 AND 225 OF VERA IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 26, T.25 N., R.44 E.W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON JUNE 1989 SCALE: I = 50 NO CI C2 CHORD 28. 28 42. 43 DELTA 90'00' 00" 90'00' 00" RADIUS 20. 00 30. 00 LENGTH 31. 42 47. 12 TAN 20. 00 30. 00 Inland Pacific Engineering Company South 25 Altamont Spokane, Washington 509 535 -1410 99202 FINAL PLAT OF FIVER JUN 1 1989 v "� SW CORNER SEC.26 - 25 - 44 N VICINITY MAP /80' I 1 /q ,800 R1 /8o /q, S oo 1 /80' 8 Xo, o $ 7 2/,600 /8o' /E 2001.91 7 22,680 43 /80' 6 22,6801 /8o' //,1601 /25' /7,00 /00' 1.1:1.11.117 1997711'.1171 ■ r ■ • ■ ■ ' ■ +■ • PHASE II 11 1 II I IIIII uI l II IIIIIII1111111 /,/, /' x,.0900 R CT. b 8 v,680 /80' //,80o fl] /25 //,875 $ 2 /7 IE1A/ZO13.9/ 1E007'20/331 350 L.F - BAN /20 21 /6,1001 m /20' • 400 F "et 000 ®""Z2 e S U Y - BR00 10 2 ..1 O / 0 , 0 6 /E0/4.23 041 1 /'7oyo 0 24 4001 /35 /2o' 26 18, 000 / /O' /E 20/4 25 /9,600 4) /30' /05' /0,625 1 / o • /E /A/ 0/5. ,/ /EOO7 20/5. / 17 /6,4' 1 /00' 5 /7,660 43 /20 / 1E2 /2. 82 /o,6151 /0,6151 1E /A1 202/.40 /E OUT20213 16 /75001 0 b /E 202 2 /6,80 14 /6,000 ZC29. orb 2 / / .41114) "WO 8 /.E. (W)2035./6 /4: /. (/%02035/ 'E OU (5)20 2 c251 /6 8 7.78 7.48 13 /8,000 41 //5' 32OLF 8 /6,000 111 4 /5,6000 .055,Zf3 /00' /4 E 2049. 00 xisting 9 a 40 /6,500 4 /6, CO 1 . • 48 251 /s5' • 51 co /. 625 11 /.45' /25' 47 /0,615 1 /.25' a 380 L F /� 20 //. 5 , IL , J. zo1Z.6. 7 1 - r- , / --r 1 r./40, 5 2/, 7So 1 /;o' , 1'-'' g'@ .0400 IKr IZ 400 L F 10 .2 4600 i1 20' 4 /E 1/tl Z0/4.26, /E OUT ZO /4./(' 9 12' Additional R/W Dedication 1 i I IYlI 11171 2/,6 /O' I /9 O ' ' 8 "@ . 04o0 + L 10 Add Mona! r14 13 R/W Dedication 1 o' r --- /E l /V 20 /7.Z6 /F OOTZ0/5.76 • Tr A 1 . ,. 1 1�1 - �•J 1 .7 EVERGREEN J0' ''GOLF •BEST a .0/oo r./ r. Scale 1 100' Contour Int. 5' -.• . �,i -i•P. 141 � r_. ti t . ,1r -.♦; 1 1 r 11, / v 11.- • n '7 14 14 4OOLF 3" .0/00 /E /A/ 2021.36 /EOUTZOZI. 26 1 SANITARY SEWED OVERALL EVERGREEN POINT ROAD LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 26, T25 N., R44 E. W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY , WASHINGTON J ROAD M415 235 Lf /E /N ZOZS .46 /E our Z025.36, r, L... REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAN M•! /!o /E //0203 /.70 IEoUT2030 /i OCTOBER 1986 MARCH 1988 JANUARY 1989 MARCH 1989 PHASE IL 400LF 8•' @. 0x00 (e /E 14/ 2051.80 it OUT 205/.70 1 f. /-1'.• , ... L. 4'i 15 ,2o,0 1 /10 75' '0 1 s /5 //./ 205000 /E OUT e048._59 LP 8" .0414 /25 / H/1/3 5 E f'wzo48 60 46 N 17 36 5Lf 5"e .0//0 0 60' 20 //,150rp X23' Md 11 /E 20 63.30 - 18 //,250 1 /25' 1 19 a- 1 /25' / o , 0001 ( //,250 90' r 1/4 CORNER SEC. 26 ▪ ■ N O% • - \ • 1 T _ -, 1 ' 1 / Mato /E /A/ 202. /0 /E GYJ�.Z2(o2.OQ 1 •'7 :1 1.. :c /E ZO &0. 4118 /E /N 2055.90 IE OUT 2055.60 c Ti L. _ / " /E //V 20 2 00 /F OUT Z055 'Os C1 =i N V) r- N N i. TS E -. N N rt3 N N N r O ) - S.. 4) •,- S. 3 4) N o o O S- o O N Q QQH ru < a >, E �� LC) N d" LC) o0 r • N. s. a d' r-r O S-I N 1 1. r N 'S N O -1-) N r 4-. MS • V .0 N O LL S. •r C > r >).0 v, L oo • 1- - 0 >__u, • r (CS Q) 5= N = I-1 0 r = Z E N S- 4- N N s= .1...) •,- ...-../ I C r0 1 1=1 LL C E • I rcS (I) _I +. 4.- N N I O 4- 0 >, o0S_ V) N CO -)LL S- IT) N N - rC 0 1 .4 S- •r _J V N +-) N I Q C r N r>3 N (C3 •r 0 W r 3 0 0 V) •r O) +�- )) (4 v) CA- -0 O 0 N >) O w z c0 1--1¢= 0- LC) .' O N W CD Z d Q F = - • 1 • J ==CD LC) ' Z O 4. CO REVISION /QEY /5 /aNS FOR 3RD IID,o,r, v ( ?056` rY)S5 R6VV /5/oN Polk' 2,m ADA/7' /qy (Xy se712 SS REV /sE /2/ -/A5E Il L07 . NO. , brnt ORF REV /sue PN4 .2 To /7 Lc7S REV /55 PH•95F.. ' TO FINAL GE5 /6/{/ R DATE 1//8Q / /9? 3/88 z /S2 /0/66 MINIMUM TOP OF DIKE ELEVATION DRAINAGE STRUCTURE -� y FLAT POND BOTTOM ELEVATION TO BE ESTABLISHED FROM LOWEST CURB DROP ADJACENT TO POND FLAT POND BOTTOM ELEVATION TO BE ESTABLISHED FROM LOWEST CURB DROP ADJACENT TO POND CONCRETE CURB .2' MIN. DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN ASPHALT PAVEMENT 2' TYPICAL TOP OF CURB ELEVATION GRATE ELEVATION TYPICAL '208' POND WITH DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SECTIONAL VIEW TOP OF CURB ELEVATION DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN TYPICAL '208' POND WITHOUT DRAINAGE STUCTURE SECTIONAL VIEW SECTION A -A CON CRETE CURB NORMAL GUTTER ELEVATION DROPPED GUTTER UNE 4' LONG DROP (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) STREET RIGHT OF WAY LINE STREET RIGHT OF WAY LINE TYPICAL CURB DROP GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE 2' TYPICAL NORMAL GUTTER LINE DROPPED GU 1 1ER LINE CURB DROP NORMAL GUTTER LINE ELEVATION ASPHALT PAVEMENT CURB DROP NORMAL GU I I ER LINE ASPHALT PAVEMENT WAY ,J ; CONCRETE CURB TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION 6 X 6 -10/10 MESH IN BASE 50 RIGHT OF WAY TYPE "A" CURB 2" CLASS "B" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4 % TO 6 1/4 % ASPHALT ON 4" CRUSHED ROCK TOP COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT SPECIFICATIONS. STORMWATER FLOW TEMPORARY ROCK SUMP ELEVATION VIEW -�-- B' DIAMETER ROCK SUMP .....„...) PLAN VIEW BOLIVAR ROAD 26TH AVENUE BOLIVAR COURT 1" TO 3 "'' DIA. WASHED GRAVEL END OF ASPHALT PAVING AND CURB ASPHALT PAVING SHAPE SUBGRADE LOCALLY TO CREATE POSITIVE DRAINAGE INTO ROCK SUMP #4 BARS 0 8" O.C. IN TOP SET PRECAST CONCRETE TOPS ON MORTAR BED, THICKNESS AS REQUIRED, TO MATCH ADJACENT SIDEWALK BROOMED FINISH SHAPE GRASS TURF LOCALLY AROUND OUTLET OF STRUCTURE EXISTING ASPHALT 4" CLASS "B" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4 % TO 6 1/4 % ASPHALT ON 4" CRUSHED ROCK TOP COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT SPECIFICATIONS. THIS SECTION OF SIDEWALK AND /OR CURB TO BE INSTALLED Af IER INSTALLATION OF INLET STRUCTURE EDGE OF SIDEWALK SIDEWALK WHERE APPUCABLE / 7-- EXPANSION JOINT PLAN VIEW SIDE ELEVATION SLOPE VARIES TYPICAL CROSS - SECTION EVERGREEN ROAD " - TYPE "B" CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PAVEMENT 2' MINIMUM TYPICAL BOTH SIDES OF INLET STRUCTURE NORMAL GUI ILR LINE DROPPED GUTTER LINE SHEET LEFT CURB 2050 2060 2060 RIGHT CURB 2050 CURB DROPS 0 STA 1 +00 & 1 +10 COUNTY DATUM COUNTY BM NO. 115 SE CORNER OF TOP CONCRETE STEP AT 13815 E. 32ND AVE. NW CORNER EVERGREEN AND 32ND AVE. ELEV.= 2013.674 '208' POND A2 -0-3' BOTTOM EL. = 2056.56 BLOCK 11 1 '208' POND Al - CR 2059.62 CR 7056.07 u ► .. - _. _ -.0080 -.0080 26TH A E UE '208' POND A2 65.00' -.0080 CR 2057.77 SEE SHEET 1 OF 3 0 LL = '208' POND E 2 BLOCK 9 EVERGREEN POINT THIRD ADDITION PV{ STA = 1 75 INSTALL N PE "8" DRYWELL 4I H TYPE 3 METAL FRAME & GRATE ',,.. 1 STA 1 +50.5 Lx 36.5' GRATE EL. = 2058.52 N 7 1 1 '208' POND B CR 2058.02 MCR 2057.48 N.8917'00 "W. 75.00'. CR 2058.27 MCR 2058.42 CR 2057.75 +.0 00 '208' POND Al BOTTOM EL. = 2056.02 110.00' SEE SHEET 1 OF 3 SEC. 26, T.25N., R. 44E. W. M. BLOCK 12 < 0 O Ch CO CURB DROP 0 CR 66' 10" AMP 0 .0100 IES.= 2x3.97 IE N. = 2053.31 85.00' CR 2058.38 MCR 2058.53 CR 2057.75 BLOCK 10 CURB DROP 0 MCR -- - .0150 /- PLAT BOUNDARY '. MPORARY ROOK SU ' PS FINISHED GIRADE '208' POND B BOTTOM EL. = 2056.28 INSTALL TYPE 1 INLET WITH TYPE 1 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA 1 +61.00 RT 33.5' GRATE EL. = 2056.47 INSTALL TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 3 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA 2+37.50`L . 37.5' GRATE EL. = 2 6.78 INSTALL TYPE "A" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 3 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA 19 +03.5 RT. 44.5' GRATE EL. = 2055.05 66' 10" CMP 0.0100 IE S. = 2053.97 IE N. = 2053.31 '208' POND E BOTTOM EL. = 2055.97 CURB DROP STA 1+73 '208' POND D BOTTOM EL. = 2054.55 SPECIAL CURB INLETS 0 STA 18 +91 & 18 +96 NOTE: EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE RELOCATED WHERE NECESSARY FINISHED GRADE 18+85.09-\ LIMIT OF NEW J ASPHALT "208' POND D EVERGREEN ROAD 19 N.00'43'00 "E. 20 1 1 - 1 +.0101 +.0170 BLOCK 9 +.0180 EXIS1NG GROUND EVERGREEN POINT THIRD ADDITION DEVELOPER'S APPROVAL CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 456 -8000 65.00' CR 2059.62 MCR 2058.85 CR 2058.08 INSTALL STREET & STOP SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY SATNDARDS BLOCK 11 +.0340 +.0440 21+55.09 EDGE OF EXISTING ASPHALT LIMIT OF NEW ASPHALT PLAT BOUNDARY 0 00 ED - 0 4V 2070 2050 2060 RIGHT CURB 2050 SHEET OF 2060 RIGHT CURB 2050 2040 '208' POND F BOTTOM EL. = 2050.01 26' NOTE: EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE RELOCATED WHERE NECESSARY 20' 3' ItTST.ALL TYPE 1 INLET WITH METAL`F & GRATE STA 17 +5 :.21 LT 33.5' r , I GRATE EL. - 2050.51 CURB DROP ® STA 17 +41 & 17 +51 CURB DROPS 0 STA 17 +43 & 17 +53 63' 10" CMP ® .0100 IE W. = 2048.01 IE E. = 2047.38 COUNTY BM NO. 115 SE CORNER OF TOP CONCRETE STEP AT 13815 E. 32ND AVENUE NW CORNER EVERGREEN AND 32ND AVE. ELEV.= 2013.674 PVI STA = '16 +25 (0 PVI ELEV = 2050.31 +:0700 +.0700 +.0700 EVERGREEN POINT 5 FIRST ADDITION PVI STA = 16 +25 PVI ELEV = 2050..31 250' VC BLOCK 5 17 +36.59 --I -- 17 BLOCK 6 f L INS LL TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 3 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA 1 60.97 RT. 33.5' GRATE EL. = 2050.53 to r7 N + o I- NN- 1I ,f I t : .. Q Q) • '- c I- N V W N 0 j CO - 11.1 w PLAT BOUNDARY '208' POND F r = 5 1 +.0080 J '208' POND G EVERGREEN POINT THIRD ADDITION BLOCK 9 87.50' 87.50' INSTALL STREET 'SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY STANDAR9 BLOCK 10 SEE SHEET 2 OF 3 SEC. 26,T.25N.,R.44E.W.M. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 456 -8000 - 100' VC 80.00' ua r- M o + _o N -- - 11 c 11 11 11 > PVI STA = 18 +25 - - w P_Vl ELEV. = 2051.91___ u • w to --I W to . t N + N 0 0 j> >> moo mo W .__. t3 N PVI STA- = 18 +25 ° PVI ELEV = 2051.91 I1 + - .0392- 16 17 18 1 CR 2058.27 MCR 2058.42 CR 2057.75 95.41' N.00'43'00 "E. BOLI'AR ROAD 76.59' CR 2057.75 MCR 2058.53 CR 2058.38 1 EVERGREEN POINT THIRD ADDITION SEE SHEET 2 OF 3 _ `0392 71007 1 :vC -- PVI STA 19 +50.. _1_ PVI ELEV = 2056.81 - c v __: +.0200 - - o � + 0 0 1 y +5u 1t 2056.81 < w u, w .. . _ Ili 00 -!- > > w w - -- N EXISTING GRADE - ... o • 0° • PVI STA = 19 +50 - o c � n 0 LO PVI ELEV 2056.81 N _ o In }} .+o It II 4to _ . : +- --I m = : N PVI STA 18 +25 11 > 0 h t o w ✓ c 11 _ PVI ELEV = 2051.91 > I- J rn r - N o 11 ! � U) t, l _ .� . N w w �a cnw - -> >: w - w BLOCK 12 FINISHED, GRADE PLAT BOUNDARY ........ ...........1 ..�.�..,•34' C' 2057.37 MCR 2058. 3 0R 2058:08 '208' POND E SEE SHEET 2 OF 3 '208' POND B SEE SHEET 2 OF 3 ,-20 +35.09 M N 0 +.0200 2i .L 1 21+55.09 w I� 75.00 BOLIVAR CT. PLAT BOUNDARY co c� BLOCK 12 50' -VC CO - PVI STA- = 21 +00 o N 0) PVI ELEV 2058.56 to oo + N LO N N + o 0 11 II .. �� > 131 II to to o - N + - o tV ° CV -II 'II �I s Q w V) _V).W 0 C3 _. . .W m o0 '208' POND Al SEE SHEET 2 OF 3 INSTALL STREET SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS ` �-21 +55.09 INSTALL:. STREET & STOP SIGN PER SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS DEVELOPER'S APPROVAL DATE 19 20 21 22 PVI ST) _ 21 +00 PVI ELEV = 2058.56 FINISHED GRADE PVI STA =21 +00 PVI ELEV - =- 2058.56 EXISTING: GRADE 2060 S.I. OF 28th AVENUE a EVERGREEN ROAD FND. 1/2 REBAR W/ YPC STAMPED "MOORE 18091" 606.59 POINT NO0 ° 43'00 "E 1 56.09 S86 20 ' 55'' W 50.15 NO TE: A// Lots are Subject to 5 Wide Drainage Easements Reserved along A// Rear Lot Lines and Both Sides of A// interior Lot Lines. See Dedication. z 87.50 1\ /I V W FOURTH IA DD1T1ON A Ptn. Of TRACT 225 VERA 1 50.00 N00 ° 43'00 "E 10,937 SQ. FT. DRNG. ESMT. S00 ° 43'00 "W 2 71.5 9 10,937 SQ. FT N00 ° 43'00 "E 87.50 9 6.5 9 (BASIS OF BEARINGS) N00 ° 43'00 "E 1 1, 699 S0. FT. 5'x 10' UTIL. ESMTS N00 ° 43'00 "E o 0 rn i0,878 SO. FT. S00 ° 4300 "W 1 75.00 0 LOT 3, BLOCK 12 \ 1' WIDE STRIP S89 °17'00 "E 50.00 N00 ° 43'00 "E 1 20.00 95.00 N00 °43'00 125.00 in 75.00 N DRNG. ES MT. I � 0 N N 505. 00 14' OF ADDITIONAL R/W FOR EVERGREEN ROAD W1/4 CORNER SECTION 26 0 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S o CORNERS NOS. 1466 & 2629 FND BRASS CAP 84 R.P.'S PER co FINAL PLAT OF EVERGREEN POINT LOT 2 , BLOCK 1 1 1' WIDE STRIP EVERGREEN POINT THIRD ADDITION BEING A REPLAT OF PTNS. OF TRACTS 210 AND 225 OF VERA IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 26, T.25 N., R.44 E.W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON JUNE 1989 SCALE: I = 50' CHORD 28. 28 42. 43 DELTA 90'00' 00" 90'00' 00" RADIUS 20. 00 30. 00 LENGTH 31 . 42 47. 12 TAN 20. 00 30. 00 Inland Pacific Engineering Company South 25 Altamont Spokane, Washington 509 535-1410 99202 FINAL PLAT OF 5`171-""3 L L'ne is $ � Q (c t r eJ a.s b.e. � uil i - r kie 5 1; fe. a F { r zZ� i •u-A✓ue d ° es E2 ® s k ut-As e3, 4 . is b ' - : y - S.I. OF 28th AVENUE 8& EVERGREEN ROAD FND. 1/2 REBAR W/ YPC STAMPED "MOORE 18091" r V r r< <i r< / / / 2 FIN FIRST 606.59 PO1NT w Q 4- O O o C) C\1 0 CY) z N00 ° 43 "E 1 56.09 S86 20' 55" W 50.15 ADD 1T 1 O I\I O O N NO TE: A// Lots are Subject to 5' Wide Drainage Easements Reserved along A// Rear Lot Lines and Both Sides of A// interior Lot Lines. See Dedication. CY) Coo 7 80 00 BLOCK 5 CTi N N 0 L 'MOUNTAIN VJ W FOURTH ADG lTl c)N A Ptn. Of TRACT 225 VERA 10,320 SQ. FT. r- rn -DRNG. co ESMT. 6' z 5'x 10 UTIL EASEMENTS 5 5' 80.00 - -- 4 1 - 80.00 L() N 1 50.00 N00 °43'00 "E To BOLIVAR N 87.50 J f DRNG. ESMT. 3 10,937 SQ. FT 0 70.00 NINE N00 ° 43'00 "E 4 J 0 O O CY 10,150 SQ. FT. 87.50 87.50 1 87.50 2 298.50 (BASIS OF BEARINGS) EVERGREEN ROAD N00 ° 43 00 150.00 0 ll E �� 0 N00 43 00 E o o 1 o ,. N) N 74°135 9' 44 DRNG: �� =° C \ . ESMT. 1 O O O) x 10' UTIL. ESMTS.- 0 O 10,937 SQ. FT O O BLOCK 95.08 5' WIDE UTIL. ESMT. ° 11,699 S0. FT 5'x 10' UTIL. ESMTS N00 ° 43 "E 10,487 SQ. FT. 10,878 SO. FT. / 5' WIDE UTIL. ESMT ` - 95.41 ROAD s00 4 3' 0 0 "W 2 71.5 9 In 11,988 S0. FT. N JJ BLOCK 1 1 25.30 1 1 5.41 3 76.59 5' WIDE UTIL. EASEMENT 1 TEN 9 6.5 9 ON E a � 0 0 0 rn co o z 0 0 0 270.05 120.00 O N 25' I �n u� co_ O O 27.5 N00* 43'00 "E 1 20.00 7 5.0 0 29.5 IN - DRNG. ESMT. 0 cr N N w J W JJ - 65.00 5' WIDE UTIL. EASEMENT WI N DRNG. 2 ESMTS . N 75.00 N ' 95.00 N 00°43'00 125.00 2 O 0 CO 5' O O O 0 Lf� m .J 10,625 S0. FT. ( 5'x 10' UTIL. ESMT. -;� ) 125.00 O O O L d r Co c 0 S00 ° 4300 "W 1 75.00 LOT 3, BLOCK 12 I' WIDE STRIP S89 °17'00 "E 50.00 1 505.00 1 14' OF ADDITIONAL R/W FOR EVERGREEN ROAD W I/4 CORNER SECTION 26 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S CORNERS NOS. 1466 81 2629 FND BRASS CAP 81 R.P. S PER FINAL PLAT OF EVERGREEN POINT LOT 2, BLOCK I I 1' WIDE STRIP ( N 00°43 30.00 EVERGREEN POINT THIRD ADDITION BEING A REPLAT OF PTNS. OF TRACTS 210 AND 225 OF VERA IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 26, T. 25 N., R.44 E.W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON JUNE 1989 SCALE: I" = 50' NO CI C2 CHORD 28. 28 42. 43 DELTA 90'00' 00" 90'00' 00" RADIUS 20. 00 30. 00 LENGTH 31 . 42 47. 12 TAN 20. 00 30. 00 Inland Pacific Engineering Company South 25 Altamont Spokane Washington 509 535-1410 99202 FINAL PLAT OF REC tivEU MiY 2 6 1989 coulity E n ee tRS DERS , husb3Ild and ; , aib d in and t .+xe and aet}t1 tr1 e and vol it ry. d e#z i i 0 > ". - 1 0 NJ 0 II 0_ O 0 11 Ce a) co oo a_ 3 w a. 0 0 0 a 1 N z 0 N w m 0 O Z/ 0 '= 0 00) ai 0 cn -� c 0 v 7 Q T N tto 0 P < 0 z W ® W < CL 0 0 Iz W w O w WI o z W > 0 W U) SHEET 1 OF 1 JOB NUMBER 89039 e EXISTING DEVELOPMENT TYPE "A" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 1 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA. 17 +45 GRATE EL. = 2050.73 SEC. 27 T 25N R 44 E 17 EVERGREEN ROAD 18 i N 00 E TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER EVERGREEN POINT THIRD r - a z- C ---------- " — ADDITION PLANS 19 20 SEC. 26 T 25N., R 44 E.W.M. i EXISTING CURB AND SIDEWALK RAILROAD TIES N I + S PRINKLER HEADS �- ; • • , • • • • .................. .. ' . .. LIMITS OF ASPHALT REMOVAL ��■ O ® .- / • 11110' Al" ` ` , . < CD `- " ® • WATER METER 150.00 4" CONCRETE CURB Saillit , ( SHRUBS DRIVEWAY • REMOVE ASPHALT PAVING AND DRIVEWAY AS NECESSARY 5' TO CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS MAINTAINING LESS THAN 10% w z Q it = 1- N SLOPE IN DRIVEWAY. RELOCATE AND RECONNECT EXISTING SPRINKLER HEADS AS DIRECTED BY LOT OWNER. REGRADE AND RESOD AREA BEHIND SIDEWALK TO MATCH EXISTING LAWN. REMOVE RR TIES AND DELIVER TO LOT OWNER. A P t n . Of TRACT 225 VERA — RAN C / L 30' R/W 34' EVERGREEN POINT FIRST ADDITION 1 EVERGREEN POINT THIRD ADDITION 1 BLOCK 9 P � �' 1 �`l. 24' 5.5' 22. _ 1 11' +/- 11' +/- 11.5' +/- 2% ..... SLOPE VARIES EXISTING ASPHALT 1 �V _ � � aj 4" CLASS "B" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING „ „ 5 3/4 % TO 6 1/4 % ASPHALT ON 4" CRUSHED TYPE B ROCK TOP COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT CONCRETE CURB SPECIFICATIONS. AND GUTTER TYPICAL CROSS - SECTION ,...(.',3-i' i F _ ` -f.a �s , � � U r,OTTv THE PE ' ∎ E'.�:�� N 24 I- r K �; -, �;c 2 . ... r:3 �,. f__ `v*, -a • 'f 4. . � *�iga....^.°' • COUNTY DATU COUNTY BM NO. 115 SE CORNER OF TOP CONCRETE AT 13815 E. 32ND AVE. NW EVERGREEN AND 32ND AVE. CORNER ELEV. STEP . = 2013.674 CALL BEFORE DEVELOPER'S YOU DIG `APPROVAL DATE 456 -8000 1 2060 Or) 6L 09+91. ZL'1790Z 18+85.09 2055.64 09+L L 69' L9OZ 06 n ;OZ C/L 2055 ZO'9+L 2051.32 2050 . • ND SIDEWALK 2060 BEGIN CURB .0294 - 3 10 0 0 0 LT 38 09+91. 6L 1790Z +.0259 6099+9 L 2055.70 RIGHT CURB 2055 . zo 1. L '190Z 09 +L. L gg Lgoz 0 ;OZ _- -- -- 2050 - - - , • 1 17 1 8 19 20 21 1 0 NJ 0 II 0_ O 0 11 Ce a) co oo a_ 3 w a. 0 0 0 a 1 N z 0 N w m 0 O Z/ 0 '= 0 00) ai 0 cn -� c 0 v 7 Q T N tto 0 P < 0 z W ® W < CL 0 0 Iz W w O w WI o z W > 0 W U) SHEET 1 OF 1 JOB NUMBER 89039 e 190 f, I93 20 AVE.. ^JOT br 0:60 PIT toN OPr AII►t WAY A.40^013 ADD MO G ► -. 'E .at LCI=V- 1177 INTO "AD. 895 - 24 I �+ • i No2143 0 t9 0 0 0 Z 23 SEC. 26 T.25N. AvcL. p. .12 - SC AL•e• 1 L 1 " 00 22 No. IZ.O1-440f No. 2173 -50' 240 G44 /' 239 644./ _._ -40' ,}yo• A 143 G43.55' iott? fly A- tip 3 6 '" 2. /3 Eik N00 43'00 "E 298.50 ROA • 43'00 "E CO z O O c Ln N CO z / 80 EA 150.00 N00 ° 43'00 "E 0 7.5 0 87 O) N00 * 43'00 "E r�J 95.08 S0 0 ° 43'00"W 2 71.5 9 N00 ° 43'00" _ 70.05 0 5 EVERGREEN ROAD `1 vrJ1 At 7 5.00 1 20.00 :P0 ND 65.00. 00 ° 4 30 0 "W 1 75.00 9 .59 / / 1 MPo R064. 71 15 7Z u IJ O FF 0 0 in 7 5.0 0 -J2.17 r o." G 0 0 CT) O 0 c o A5 i Nt MAP CALE: I " = 50' NO CHORD DELTA RADIUS C I 28. 28 .90'00' 00" 20. 00 C2 42. 43 90'00 00" . 30. 00 NELL WITH FRAME & GRATE 2050.73 ING CURB SIDEWALK )INT DN SHRUBS RAU4 °OAD TIES" EVERGREEN ROAD : 18 DIRECTED ' T OWNER...- WATER METETV EXISTING LAWN. REMOVE RR TIES AND DELIVER TO LOT 0 A Ptn. Of TRACT 225 VERA N 00'43'00" PR NKLER H REMOVE " ASPHALT PAVING AND D DRIVEWAY . - ~ AS NECESSARY 5 TO „CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS MAINTAINING LESS' THAN 10% mw� . ,SLOPE IN DRIVEWAY. REL AND - RECONNECT ,EXISTING SPRINKLER HEADS AS REGRADE AND RESOD AREA BEHIND SIDEWALK TO MATCH ✓ DRIVEWAY,' r .. ..4.... LP 19 LIMITS OF ASPHA O 0 • 150.00 N00 43 "E 7.50 N00' 43'00 "E S00 ° 43'00 "W 2 71.5 9 / Tiem- pogifzi g oc4 SM,UVMP5 EVERGREEN ROAD 00°4300 W 175.00 0 AsiNii ARP CALE: I" = 50' NO CHORD DELTA RADIUS C I 28. 28 90'00' 00 20. 00 C2 42. 43 90 00 30. 00 a ` r 7 Elecome prozAt m00 maw* ma* NEM AIME ®128 MN A 2/3 • / EMU ° elg : ' : / •4 f c 3 •. fatn a /7TH AV. 19 9 /C 11• et • ••' ••• wWri ) A j � 7 T I IP: IL- 4• 9 // 10 8 • 0 1 22: Np /F a /5 /1 0 S Rau , 3 i 4 5 'i4E1 hism1 • 2414t 193 v 1 190 T 27 27 z (b z 0 Ave. No.I22 4• .J d so Y 1 s j t! A• Q{Is J ® Wit Al p I { t Y mm 4 4 L.8 V '4G ` r � i.✓ : G T. •s . 23 1 7SftG °• • 3 b Y9 14 ' is .41 I!! o • 404040 .I U �, 5, ••• INC* V i l y 10 ` �. • tZ �• t s '+ • :; ' U 1 i1 t • � 9 t +i b {�•p t NMI a*fil IAA,- a 111111111 44r � 4 YJ 4 1 _ ^• 13, �� Eil 241tiPLAIN 1. 8 G44.75' • cs 2I0 24I LCO, 0 1•5 o a d 26 G44./ G44.7 2I1 224 240 TP 0 2 0 0 227 644. /' 1 32;" A ve 238 _G44 AY¢.. -40 2 1.P 0 0 z Q .209 r •••• °r 045.72' 2 i4 2`21 2`;3 0 l ct 2 a 4 F Ik /3 22 SU o. 12OI -40 20 Ave. No. 2173 -50' k "10 'OT /At AD D. O. c4 -.5 /5 sasAt.. r7 - 0 .. RAD. 995- B Ne2143 7 TH 0 z 0 0 0 z 23 'L;, Milir-o k ce I u I MINItES f k ITN i Ni 1 4111 kti 1 tifil 1.10. 434- 60' 4 35 SEC. 26 T 2C.56.4 5 cA1.,,E 1- ~ 1 " i qtr, N Y P -1 3 i 6 2060 CA 2055 2050 2060 RIGHT CURB 2055 R/W 2050 EXISTING ASPHALT SEC. 27 T 25N., R 44 E.W.M. SEC. 26 T 25N., R 44 E.W.M. 30' C/L 11 + " CLASS "B" ASPHALT CON SNTAINING 3/4 % TO 6 1/4 % ASPHALT 0 CRUSHED ROCK TOP COURSE IN ACCORDANCE TH WSDOT SPECIFICATIONS. TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION • COUNTY DATUM COUNTY BM NO. 115 SE CORNER OF TOP CONCRETE STEP AT 13815 E. 32ND AVE. NW CORNER EVERGREEN AND 32ND AVE. ELEV. = 2013.674 1 22.5' 24' 34' 11.5' SLOPE VARIES EXISTING DEVELOPMENT 414 5.5' 2% R/W EVERGREEN POINT FIRST ADDITION " TYPE "B" CONCRETE CURB AND GUIIER TYPE "A" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 1 METAL FRAME & GRATE STA. 17 +45 GRATE EL. = 2050.73 17 EXISTING CURB AND SIDEWALK 17 cn 0 SHRUBS • EVERGREEN ROA WATER METER REMOVE ASPHALT PAVING AND DRIVEWAY AS NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS MAINTAINING LESS THAN 10% SLOPE IN DRIVEWAY. RELOCATE AND RECONNECT EXISTING .SPRINKLER HEADS AS DIRECTED BY LOT OWNER. REGRADE AND RESOD AREA BEHIND SIDEWALK TO MATCH EXISTING LAWN. REMOVE RR TIES AND DELIVER TO LOT OWNER. 1 50. 00 4" CONCRETE CURB A Ptn. Of TRACT 225 VERA 18 18 ,PRINKLER HEADS N 00'43'00" E DRIVEWAY LP f 19 LIMITS OF ASPHALT REMOVAL 19 TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER EVERGREEN POINT THIRD ADDITION PLANS EVERGREEN POINT THIRD ADDITION BLOCK 9 1 CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 456 -8000 20 20 DEVELOPER'S APPROVAL DATE W Z F— W N < 1 1 rn 03 n. En n_ 3 w g 0 rm., z C o :c �. ci.:4 V m O O c (2) z z o Z a ;I: it) to la4 " o 0 Z W 0 W < 0 0 a! w . W . O. > -- tC) o z N > 0 W cr t17 SHEET 1 OF i JOB NUMBER L 89039 )