Loading...
PE-1414-81 (2)F 17);Ite Submitted Description Initials I L'tJP i / AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES COMPLETED & 7y ;PO ACCOUNI l'• � 3 / FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TB'ACCOUNTING NOTICE TO PUB11C # I 3 4 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED _/� 1 12 / /9 / / qt/ 64ES1Th'J P)E�/ j IAION SUBMITI G( 7- 2/ -- (? % . s y _� h, 11j� / ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS / ) LOTS __ / / HEARING EXAM - BBC _ APPROVED _ DENIED _APPEALED _APPROVED _ DENIED rtwM Rib 6bt At 4t gip 2h A:Iii3 u IL_ u lft0 4- P.D Ht at z w 24 WI q4- 4Wt4(,yo tab"' firms To IJZ.e 4a 6 - I1 -9 raryt,,.,,.7fb &vseue eta • UtA- ")1 sly s 4 --15 iuki 44- Rilw et RD l Ps il4 z tat) I.drrz • tout ere(' BELek56 m c rl G TiRAtkic M(MASK� $e4o rt f MIP/kyAt -(a "caudcenwl `) ra t __ I _ -- . ..onl - • -' IN 6 _ . r- _ ..... 24 1.444 latagaiS APAINAtio FAL la yQ( r� P314 t l bQ fl /» 91 Zt7 oral AO k lei 4113 imi L ,, i - PO ilp 6Nw44 -. ED lit t 43 Iklielcrt rte) —all 4 liCet% aDc.t- 14 \p Date to PevieW Data to AA & DR Mac Received Contact person FLO011 ZONE Planning Contact Person 1981 Address 5503 E BROADWAY -99212 J YES Time Applicant's Name H & E INVENTMENTS Time W S SCHOOL 356 Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FILE# 92 Related File # ( ) Project Name RIVERWAY VILLA PUD No. Lots 387 No.Acres 118 e - Township - ange SITE ADDRESS E BARKER \N MISSION PARCEL # 08553 -9009+ Date Conditions mailed Phone # 534 -6531 Work # Phone # Ti -- ^7111111111 ktial-t �Til�flb G .ti (iur codfrrd INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 25�S ALTAMONT SPOKANE WA 99202 Phone # r- 'n '>iQr Ci 456 -2205 (4 p \t\review.tor ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET Date Submitted Description Initials Ado '7 -45 ! � t 1 hh4n ; 6&Y it4 '� t 4G 42, 4 t 5Ir 56d $5) ; Co. 1V mica � 4 a a. 4 e.. aii / m Kee /�-lbt� of i it t 1, 0 101 deed-, ''i R � /' 1-" -1415 . ccr+..sAS M tJa( ¥ v S � R -v� a� vil esu45 RD d2 b t,3 v blts 4 Pam Pizez 040 ( . „A -2,04 4s/ te 4(/€4a (x4 k I45 la i W #b eng 7 t� 44/ ?6- 9 // cagy s- �IC(7g50- Waa�t� � -.CA-Ai./.P_1 /%0l L %C`C ir---4- -7- (.L P/J440 c. dam' Pali 45 /it' P 5Z- 07/ 3 9.5- 9SPAR / /9 eAteed- hctoctl Ceo A ;,• 1 -- .,ed/Lune. ' : i 1-, h',.-a' 0 _1J i_ . do MES.4 eAsess,,./ I ns 61144 t riA Lu tc,6 t' Zane- 5 2uu145 ?A 4 D&. e?(AfAs frePrasto n� N�'n 7a cottoin Wr t?t-4 (:c /Ke �•�^� Pis 90 to 245 WC Otpu,Js l lsi teffi Co 44 tdr ??-5 I mg °/ 20 Jut-145 I.T PLA.15 /14 Cfr 24 2ucl R5 Gt5[ PL*15 Rif woo - TVIzet sib 7b17YD anlluM,E 9 /. ',D c6 , Q -5j St<<tkedi bi Co jL £n . ot f."LR� (' Mb act twolo to NLa� / im t MPQQ/M. - IflSCta',e 1 • Cr1kt•iaF a At Si eta fWbtAlaV 4t0ty k. 4L itaour -7a4 t ("mu a9 o }a`f '1) p \t\review.tor ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET 1.rt r L IICtn. a Ill STATISTICS DATE LS k C — 1\ 1 Plat Check Fee — —' 3 • L%► a .. T — w Number of Lots Road Miles New -SS zZ (Y -Kn Pc, Total Arca MAP North Arrow �jp Cr�� Scale QJ< Legend Procedures & Equipment (tk Basis of Bearings n P Ii�ePPgoLe p ok Plat Location B Title_ - Official Signature Blocks ` Surveyors Certificate } • Road Names A Road Widths ea Adjacent Area Lot & Block Numbers f p �. isarei / J , chee Ott — . 2 a1 5 e odes j jc n 7► t t wiped.- t k R/W Dedication designated !3^'e I Foot Strips qr-. 't'Q -Ac-=k t k1 V n<- 3 RPS on GLO Comers 11 a l P.le41 ON« Tract X I Al {A Lot Areas nit Bench Mark file Closure r -3C/ -9 per\nee .Jkik t.)e•a CUnle4rftv*s DFDICATTON fe a 9 — Sue* 'Hill Description (To Map) . h 0 irk— Description (To Cen) N� O / i Owners CP Certificate to Plat a� NegC y '- A}e 7 /3 -, S 1 Foot Strips r FitK RID - CPR Statement / A Access Prohibited /ri R/W Dedication r - /r Drainage Language hec k Drainage Covenant N L 01 270 17 (i2 Flood Insurance Ic /, / I # rro Stormwater Management 208 Bonds - $1,000.00 ea �/ 208 PLANS APPROVED /127 - LS Private Road Doc. N's N C e D 5 4 � DI? 41 hV Private Road Warning iy -ee ) Road Plans N ceD - 7 o't Bond Road Impro � Q 7 \ e -- Y'7s� / � i 0'- C �, _ l / � tJ �,� 2 Signed By Engineer � �. icr— -e-heck coo, v �'E n !!.'i - u - , ::ai t . , u Z � �1[�l�i..� ..aaril i ifGt�•31i C e 1 (4) toster-i—c-etrol �) ch BEFORE THE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION OF ) TIME REQUEST FOR 1'E- 1414 -81/ ) PUDE -1 -82 / ZE- 92 -81, ) FINDINGS OF FACT, I21VERWALK, AN APPROVED ) CONCLUSIONS AND PRELIMINARY PLAT, PLANNED UNIT ) DECISION DEVELOPMENT AND ZONE ) RECLASSIFICATION ) THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from C & L Development, LLC has been received and decided upon, pursuant to the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance (Section 12.100.1 18) and RCW 58:17.140. 2. 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by the Spokane County Director of Building and Planning. The original development proposal was to subdivide approximately 118 acres into 364 lots for manufactured hones, single family residences and a single commercial lot. The original proposal also included a zone reclassification from Agricultural (A) to Residential Manufactured Home (RMH) with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay zone and to Commercial (C) under the now expired, Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. 3. The subject preliminary plat, zone reclassification and Planned Unit Development (PUD) were approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on April 2, 1982. The revised preliminary plat and PUD were approved on June 16, 1995. 4. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential -3.5 (UR- 3.5) previously established as Agricultural (A) zoning in 1957 (ZE- 286 -57) and redesignated to Urban Residential -3.5 (UR.-3.5) on January 1, 1991 pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the proposal does conform to the requirements of the proposed Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) zone. 5. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions. These criteria are found in Section 12.100.118 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this decision. Section 12.100.116 states, "Approval of a preliminary subdivision, large lot subdivisions, short subdivisions, and binding site plans shall automatically expire five years after preliminary approval is granted unless a time extension is approved for the project." and Section 12.100.1 18 follows with "The Director may administratively approve an extension provided there are no significant changed conditions which would render tiling of the plat or binding site plan contrary to the public health, safety or general welfare, and further provided one or more of the hallowing circumstances is found to apply:" FINDINGS OF FACT The following are the relevant sections of Section 12.100.118 and the Division of Planning responses. Planning response: I. That some portion of the existing preliminary subdivision or binding site plan has been finalized since the project was approved and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval; RESPONSE: The last extension of time was approved May 19, 1999 and ten phases of the preliminary plat have been finalized since the preliminary plat was originally approved. Riverwalk First Addition Riverwalk Second Addition Riverwalk Third Addition Riverwalk Fourth Addition Riverwalk Fifth Addition Riverwalk Sixth Addition Riverwalk Seventh Addition A e • sJOSS30311s puu su9!ssu `smog `,CpJado.ld 0q1 Jo SJOIIM0 Jo JOUMO alp 3110(0(1! (legs „111e3gddu„ 111401 0111 „'luuogddy„ ay1 uo 9(1111(1!4 aq pegs `palepdn 40 papuotue se `5(10!1!11(100 (10!5(101x0 amp 11 put: 0011111111103 Jam ulex3 9u!.1ual-( 0111 iCq pasodun suoq!puoO 11V (pauapuli a.m .Srrou!puoa /uur5).lo aril 01 3 pow) :smo11oJ su 04011 p011004 am `5661 `91 aunf pomp Jap40 putt uo!snlouo0 `toed Jo 59(1!11(1!,1 s,uo!s!n!a 9wuueld ,(1(1003 aue)Iods oql u! paI!0acis IUnoJdde Jo 5(10!1!11(103 sno!na.ld aso11J 7YAO2IddV JO SNOI.LIQNO3 IVNYIOIJIO •C00 `1 , Clef Hum smax (E) 004111 JOJ C73AO2IddV 1C934011 s! `)Ilenvanl)l `18 b 3<I (1011130!ldde JOJ 15001)34 amp Jo uo!sualxa ue `mud Jo SfLp11!d OAOqu alp (q) putt ll:1d Xieu tlit laid e Jo; amp u011114xa alp JO 011111 JO uo!sualxa ue 9u!n0Jdde Jot 01403140 0111 (e) Jo M3IA3)1 V NOdfl C13SVfl NOISIO3(I NOISIAI(l ONINNV'Id AJNf1OD 3NV)IOas . au g l Jo uo!suatxa leuo!1!ppe 1111 9unsanboj aioJaq aauuu!p40 uo!s!n!pgnS agl Jo `81 1 1.11 uo!30ag qqm 311!,Cldwoa pJen\01 ssa49ojd panu!luoo MOl1S pplogs 4auMO /Nea!Idde any . siea,C (61) uaalaunl ,Clalewixoidde uaaq sett mid ,CJeunu!la.d alp Jo am! 11'101 Oqj •uo!sualx0 01111) a 40J lsanbaJ (1(101) 111001 alp s! SnLL 1ulppnLl Jo UO1SIA!a ,(111000 aueyodS OW 40 `S311119fl JO uo!s!nla ,(1(1000 aue)fodS 3111 `10141510 glleaH leuo!9au aueiods alp Xq papuaunuooa.l wag anuq suotl!plroa leuoulppe oN •611 aged uo u!9aq au Jo uo!sualxa tie .1OJ 15011604 snp Jo M0!A04 0111 119no4 I1 pasodult suornpuo0 mON •IenoJdde 11 :1d X4e(1!111!(aid lelufuo alp 00(11 5 3111115 0111 5(11l311104 110!11x191 SOp ueld and 51101104(11(109 0111 •11INJ11 51? luld X4eu!unla4(1 011) Jo L'OJL' aql sa1UU91sa) (111(1 an!suaga4dluo3 0111 •told ag1 Jo uollezileuJ alp paXelap 9u!AUq sXelap a%!3LJ1S!lnuq)u 011 50J!luap! )ue011ddu 01 11 :3SNOdS321 . pouad 01101 Jea,C (g) an J alp 1111(1IM 11:1(1 0111 az!leuJ 0111133!1ddU 3111 JO , C1!l!gew 0111 1/05fU3 anuq 5X111011 0A!1U435!unupt luta 'punt XIiUU pplom Josuods loafoJd alp 11011(M S11O151101XO X1!1110 o!(gnd o1 Xlddu 100 (legs 110!S1AOJd slgy 'algUl la,C 1011 041' 110!11M S33I1JOS 311g11d Jo 130!51301x0 alp uodn pauoU!puo0 sum lesodoid alp Jo luawdolanap 'p3luuJ9 SUM jLAOJdde ,CJUU!unlaJd awn 01(1 logy • luawdolanap 3111 aloldulo3 01,CJUSS00311 3Jnl0n.13SUJJul ag1 J0 pe pap!noJd arum laid X4L'lllulllaJ(I 1L'UlSIJ0 0111 JO suo!s!n!pfsasegd £I 31 0 Jo 01 Jo uo!laldtuoa 01!! :35NOdS32I `.IUn0JddL' 11L'I(I 3115 S1I!p1 q JO `13ols!A!pgns 1.101(5'110!5!A!pgns 1(JeunugaJd Jo MCI OJan\ go!gA\ 511101uannba.l 4alpo Jo 50!11015 Jo uo!laldwoa ag1 (p `.held ally 9u!pu!q J0 `uo!s!n!pgns )polls `uo!s!n!pgns Kiuunupoid atp Jo uo!1JOd it Jo pU JOJ 9u!OueuI ,(411550300 9u!ululgo (0 taus 3111 01 53OL\JOS apgnd JoJ Stglit (q `. tuawdofanap 0111 ll11jI1\ 5101 01(1 Su!XonJns •pano4dde slot 59£ ieu!9uo 3111 JO Lb£ Xfalelu!xoJddlt 05uduuOo putt pa1011.11stw0 an suo!1!ppy tpual NIUMJOn! 1 gfnoig1 15J!d 1113/11.13A1 11 •poroiddu SUM 1111(2 1131(1 XJeunu11a.d leu!S!JO alp Ip!M IUa1S!S1100 51111311104 11'11.Juwu111aid pasodoJd aqj, 13SNOdS321 :9uvnopoi aql `03 pop!tu!1 1ou s! TIN `auo ap111311! 111111s 1131110\ `veld al!s 9u!pu!q Jo luld 0111 9u!z!IettJ pJemol sdals leJuelsgns uay111 seq Josuods 01(1 putt `panoJd(1e SUM lugs (113((1 0115 91!pu!q JO 111((I leu!9uo 1pIM )1131S!S1103 XIle.laua9 su!ewa4 ua(d al!s 9u11xnq Jo `110!s!n1pgns 14ogs `1101 !A!pgns XJUmunlaJd aql 111111 Z abed le h1b1 '0N 0 1!J uo!1!ppy 1puay .ylenuan!y uo!uppy glu!N 11(1%400!)1 uo!1!ppy 111119!3 )iIUn\Jan!3 '6 8 L . VN :3SNOdS32I '£ 'Z S61.11pu aw!ylo uo1sual '1 Extension of Time Findings fle File No. PE71414 -81 Page 3 Additional Extensions of Time shall not he granted unless substantial compliance with Chapter I11, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance is demonstrated by the applicant; otherwise the preliminary subdivision and the preliminary planned unit development approval will become null and void. 4. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #3. and #4.) The "Revised Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site Development Plan (PUD) of "RIVERWALK" stamped "Received May 19, 1995," has been administratively approved shall be the official preliminary plat of record and shall be the Preliminary Planned Unit Development. This May 19, 1995 revised plan includes 9.11 acres for a proposed commercial lot and 107.3 acres for a proposed planned unit development (PUD), being a total of 116.41 acres (see said plan map). The PUD proposes 365 single family lots. At the time of each Final PUD site development plan and Final Plat is submitted for each phase they shall comply with all development standards for the approved zone classifications, including the Planned Unit Development Overlay Zone, all as amended. (see 9. below) Note, at this point in time, no part of the preliminary plat/PUD have been finalized since the original 1982 approval. 5. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #34.) The above May 19, 1995 revised plan allows development phases. These phases may be administratively amended if the various agencies Find that each proposed phase will provide proper traffic circulation, provide adequate emergency vehicle access, meet necessary utilities design and /or utility circulation requirements, and provide for the public health and safety. 6. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #3.) The "Revised Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site Development Plan (PUD) of RIVERWALK" stamped "Received May 19, 1995," now replaces: (1) the "Preliminary Plat of Record" neap - dated November 12,1981, as approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 2, 1982, which consisted of 365 manufactured home lots and 1 commercial parcel and (2) the "Revised Preliminary Plat of Record" map dated March 15, 1983, as approved by the Spokane County 1- Tearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 14, 1983, which was a redesign of the 50.2 acre South portion (S It2) with 178 lots, excluding the commercial parcel. This S 1/2 also being the Final PUD Site Development Plan approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 14, 1983, is now NULL and VOID and is replaced with the above May 19, 1995, preliminary plat /PUD. Note, since the final plat for Phase I was submitted before the decision to approve the May 19, 1995, Revised Plan, Phase I may he finalized under the provisions of the April 14, 1983, Final PUD, S 1/2. 7. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #3.) A "Final PUD Site Development Plan" must be submitted and approved for at least the area of each proposed final plat prior to recording any Final Plat, other than Phase 1. This includes the S 1/2 of RIVERWALK (previously Riverway Villa). Each "Final PUD" must substantially conform to the above May 19, 1995, revised preliminary plat /PUD and comply with the applicable development standards existing at the time of submittal. 8. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition 44. and 6.) The approved zone change, ZE -92 -8 1, shall be amended pursuant the PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT. The project area approved for the old approved Residential Mobil Home (RMI-l) Zone with the old PUD Overlay Zone shall be substituted with the present Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) Zone and the present PUD Overlay Zone. The project area approved for old Commercial (C) Zone shall be substituted with the present Community Business (B -2) Zone. The existing UR -3.5 Zone shall be reclassified as each phase of the development is recorded as a Final Plat with the County Auditor. The reclassification shall he consistent with the proposed zoning approved with the preliminary plat of record, as amended by the PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT. 9. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition 117 and #11.) The final plat(s) shall be designed substantially in conformance with the above "Revised Preliminary Plat of Record date stamped May 19, 1995." No increase of density or number of Tots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. Each Final Plat shall comply with the current development standards of the Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) Zone and the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay Zone, as each may be amended. The proposed commercial parcel shall com ply with the current development standards of the Community Business (13-2) Zone, as amended. The entire site shall also comply with the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) overlay zone. 10. The Planning Director /designee shall review any proposed final plat and final Planned Unit Development Plan to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 1 1. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition 115) e •apeut ale sluawanoJdwi ,G:mpe04 uagm asuadxa s,1 u13011dde OW 111 paleaolaJ aq Hugs Xogl Man sup URplm apnuI 0413 sluautanoJdwl anogn Op J0 ,(uc JI sa!1!I!ln pun Xem- Jo -143!J pool JoJ 110411 uonls!11boc aln111J am unp!m paleool aq wogs su3!s pamope Jo playulc4p 'SUM ,80Z, '9u!)lled '9uide0spunl pannbaJ op4 :o '13040 140n1s111b0U a.111111J panJasaJ am UI04J pa.mscaw aq hugs apo0 9u!uoZ Xluttop auelods am ,Cq pannbaJ s jocglas Jat110 pue OmpI!nq a4nlnd •q 'pnoy J0.y.IU J Stole uoge0!pap Jo 100J S I pue anuany uOISSiln1 &tole uo11ea!pap Jo la0J 01 pannbaJ sell 4001113ud X1 111100 01 14.:94.011 4 4 'Pnoy Ja3lln£1 pun 011 113A uolss!W 9uole ,Cum- Jo -10J palcaipap Xlmali Jo /pun &11!15!x0 am 01 uo!1!ppn u! `50!111!211 put ,Cemjo-lLi3u peoJ JoJ (3041' 11 014i5! lbOU 0.1n11J p0n4osoJ sU 11011111 2!sap an pugs puov .IaNJe£1 3tolc laoj g pue oniony uolssilnl &tole laaJ 01 kcal ly •e :014eogdde j! `3u!molloj 091 apinoJd Ileys pun lnld 11111!1 011 Jo 3u!pJ03oJ NJ sU OWI'JJ 011111 OU1US 0911 t1tp!m pal mooww aq p1o011s a °uoN 0114 •9u!uut:ld Xit too auetlods Xq Xluo `14131 u! JO Ipww u! `pasealaJ aq Xew aa!loN ap!y eamt: uo!1!s!tban annul I10n.tasa.l 091 'saml!211 pue X1311\ Jo -lq ?u peal JoJ 113.114 11o!psnlboe punt 04111113 a 9teXpoads F101.LON 3111.1. c J0l!pny X1uno0 aql Illlm Noon put: aiedaid hugs &u!uueld ,4111100 aunyods fZ •0(1105 411'111 S,.IOSSassu 0le!Jd0Jddl,' 091 11012'111 hugs 01ua5 aIIJ •pazllellll &lllag 130413 0111 Jo pal 111 pau111no sduul 040111 40 0110 1!wgns (lugs Jo,CanMns s jteogddu 091 'le!d levy alp jo uo!pod e 40 Ile jo 3inly of 4oud •leld Ieuy ayl 9ugy of loud 3uluueld ,C1uno0 aunllods of pagsnuOJ aq Hugs a1111 jo saleoyy4ao 110 11413 (r) .inoj 'leld luny alp 30 lnlpulgns 0111 gum pan!aoa.1 aq hugs sonleduloo , (1!11111 0lcudoidde Xq 5 2110 10 0 5110 X111911 Jo Ieno.dde 1 . mid mug pasodold amP3o sa!doo uo paleolpul 04 hugs sluawasua XJ!lnn aleudoiddy . mid Ieuy am Jo auoz 9u!,CiJapun 01(130 a9elu0JJ uu1tulunu 01(1 paaaxa Jo haul Li0UIm 5101 Des- ap-Ina uo sgl&uaI 041 )laughs pie,( alealpu! Rigs mid mu"; aqJ. ,,•pau!ulgo 041' SICAOJdde 31.1111oz 40doid J! Luau paten aq leul mid sup uo palea!put s)longlas ayy - 1nld luny sty uo P0UUJp XIleoy!0ads 0413 slpuglos asap: ssalun pajsanba4 oie sl!uuod Su1P1!nq anti 0111 113 paunwalap aq pugs memos 11413, 41104 pue pie,( apes„ :luauIale3s &ulmolloj ayl u!cluoo pegs uo!lealpap a43.'spco. 0!Ignd Jo „X melt„ `alenud Ile atoll sjouglas p uX papnbai alp aug pagsep 'map u Xq aleo!pu1 (lugs dual lnld mug atld. •paluolput aq Hugs (s)autuu 1)1304 aleudolddy 'pa1n0!pu! ad Mugs (so)ssaippe mans aleudoJdde 091 'lnld Ieuy agl Jo 9114y of Joud •aau0Isappolaan4 3u!uucld 0(12 Xq panoJdde aq of .aquuttl /aweu Lions 'paly s! lcld rim otp aiojaq pasodoid 04 hugs JaquInu /aweu leld Ieuy v •Ieno4dduio suolupuoo alp P' "Id pas!na4 `5661`61 Xe1N panoJdde atp Lillm aouugdwoo lepuelsgns JoJ pue suo9 e11153J 1U0JJI13 gl!m 0011e01.1.100 aunulalap 01 saloua9e aleudoJdde woJJ S1110111 WOO 403 paluploJ!o ad II!m ueId luawdolanap 0115 owoads au •,(luno0 aueyods of paultugns aq hugs (uecl Jo Iln) ue1d luawdolanap 0315 oiuoads a 'pond Ie!OJ001 L1103 aql uo suuuad 9uippnq X1111 9u!nss! 01 Joud (sy uOlupuo0 9ututteld (6/g/8 minus') •(s)aa1 A40S Jo neia.1 ode() „3u!AJas le001„ pue „pool ogg9!au„ 30 0501(1 paaaxa lot op 50511 lutaammo° 1u anal! •0 pee'papuautn se'spJnpucls peoJ ,Cluio0 aueyods 0111 Jo spiepunls luawdolanap agl Lil!m 00uepduloo u! s! 0115 lnpJaunu0a 0114 1e111 04115111 'g 'papuowe se 'apop 3unIoZ ,C1uno0 ouellodg aql Jo spi11punls 4u011ldol0nap 0111 yl!m 03111:0111103 111 s! 0115 I13I0Jatl114100 all( 111 04115111 L' :1111115 ,Clunoj oun)Iods 'paled lnlOJauWUroa au) sap11IOuI Li0rtlm 11111 p:uy u 011 1p.000J 04 Joud r abed L8 •oN al!d 'OZ '61 '81 LI '£I 72 s6u!pu!j awu jo uo!sualxj Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1414 -81 Page 5 d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, draintield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses. c. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interior" improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future acquisition area. 22. Spokane County Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a TITLE NOTICE noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This TI'T'LE NOTICE shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as the recording of the final Plat and shall only be released, in full or in part, by Spokane County Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on [ ], imposing a variety of special development conditions. pile No. [ ] is available for inspection and copying in Spokane County Planning. 23. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement for those lots located on a cul -de- sac /stub road: Lot(s) , Block(s) are located on a temporary cul -de- sac /stub road. This cul -de- sac /stub road may be extended to provide access to adjacent property and /or connect to existing roads or new roads as development and /or circulation needs dictate. 24. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire'protection district, County Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. 25. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been trade with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by . the appropriate health authorities prior to application. for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 2G. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local lire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision; and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance ofa building permit for each lot. 27. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state- licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat, " including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as- built" water system. 28 . The Water Plan and the above conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director /designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 29. A survey is required prior to the filing ofa final plat. 30. Approval is required by the Planning Director /designee of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 31. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 32. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Planning Director /designee shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of • ei• - p013Iduton oq ins sis,Clt:uc pauoIluawaJoJU alp lulu atp Jo uo!lt:zputiu pasegd JoJ ''ll!A C"m.lan!y jo 9ui.yaaga lead ,Cue 01 .101.1d 'b • SJ1101.110nOJd uu pannba.1 otp 1oj amps aleuo(podojd u passasse oq II!m Jodolanap alp `961pw9dt uolloasnalu! JOJ paw( 11 auluualap s(s,Cltue aql pinogs - anuaAV 1101SSILAJ put( peo21 J0,)Jeu 111 sa3!nap IoJluoa OIJ"J) .10J pant( ow JO uonen(ena ay1 JOJ s!suq a Se OAJOS 11!m asiyd 1(3130 JoJ s15411113 01191.11 y 1.1091 uodsuuJJ Jo 1u0u11.mda(3 uolfut(s11M Jo °11:15 0111 gllm 90111(1!)J000 oq 111m 5!s,(I1111 s1 L •11olltzputiu luld of Jo!.lcl ,C1unop aue)lods Xq pama!na4 put( Jadolanap alp Jo pannbaJ oq mat osugd yea jo s!sCleue own() y,. :IcnoJddejo suo!1!puoa 1"!19!0 aql Jad sv •anuan\ uo(sslyq pue 1/11011 .10)1.1118 01 apeul 0.111 sltlaulanO.ldun 1"!°1111 uOgm 0001 aql w ,ClunoJ oue)lods Xq ()aniline aq /Cclu Xpodoid spa •OAJOS0.1 111 09150 las oq [MIS 011110AV uoiSSIIn1 91.1ole glp(m u! la0J 01 pue peou J0)1118 9110111 gtplm u! 100J S Xpodoid jo WAS e `!0!111 °!pap Cemyo -lg9u pannbaJ alp o1 uop(ppc u! `veld p lel.lal.'V ayl luaulaldlm 0) .10[3.10 111 'ut(ld 01(1 ul 90(1!00(5 05019 gum 1ua1s!suo3 1012 OM swim ,Cum Jo -1119! 9u11s!xa ayJ. 'I 2IONIIN e 511 °tunny uolss!IN pun ('ij UV 9'IdIDN11Id 11 sc peoy 1a)lpuq 50y!luap! tick( P11o'l (mJ0UV ,ClunoO 31 11 •31g10!ldde 111 an: suo!I!puo0 pasodun ,Clsno!noJd 111 •1 :p0so0o.1d sy A1J0d0.1d ° asf JO 1!twad atnpllnu 11J0 93ucnssl of loud SUVOU (INV 9NRIfNI'JN3 dO NOISIAI(I A.LNROD ;INV?IO(IS . p0p.10001 s! uuld MIS 9u1Pu!£1 1 11 U.10911 0)15 I "LO.launu03 01(1 Jo 51109!0(1 Jo ales pue uo!s!n!p ,Claw!1 mope 01 Mid 011S 9lllplll8 1? J01 110111'o11dd1' a)Iuw plllolls Jallmo /1uua1Idde a1(1 ' 1 11 1( [MU e JO 9u!pJO0oJ alp tp!m 9uw0z Z-£J p011111J9 s! I00Jed I11t0.10utuo0 alp J'UV „•suo!lelnfay w11J 0Jd au!104o1(S ,ClunoJ aueyods 01(1 ulens.1nd uo!lelaan (c .1IAeu 01(1 9uBueya pue (soma) 9u!pnlou!) sonl10I1Jls 91.1! ppm( uo suopcl!up( amp( ,CJupunoq 011(10 .10gs 1003 OOZ ayl u1l)lm ,Cpodold ands undo uowwoa Jo ,Cp odo.1d 5,101 Xuy„ :0) Jel!w!s luaulalels 11 0 1 30 1 011 111 01 1s HJLLON H'I1LL 041 •JOJ!pny ,Clunop 091 gum 1 leukl 011 9u!pJoaaJ .1aue ,C1ale!paulun 9 !!!! 11 1( (1!000 aue)lods Xq papl000I oq 11 dOILON 8 IJ 11 `augalogs alp JO 6Jepunoq loo( OOZ aql 1.191)!m ,Cpe!ucd 301 ,Cue (pm paplooal sl 1111( (MU "JI '6£ 'S£ „•sa01laj 9tnpnlau! `S0Jnlan.us Jo 9ulpinul pue uouela9an luenslnd pue( slip Jo 0sn atp uo suo!1e1!ttl!I legal 5111.f CJepunog DWI 0.101[S 100J 00Z ° 1(1!m XUadojd 01 11,, :awls gonlm aaeds lado 1.101.1.11000 [MU 510( Pal°aJJw 0111 J11au 9u!n+1Jp ueld lLU!d 0111 uo paaeld oq 11 (Z 151101 in) son :N'1 leu!d e se 909/0004 sl 1l alojaq (saullalogs pue 9uwoz tpoq) s)1o11gpos pannbaJ pe 5100'11 111 0us alquppnq 11 an11tl lsnul klepunoq loot OOZ a 11 sapn(0u! go!gm )0( 9011 •,CJepunog aullalogs loo, OOZ 011 MOBS p"ys 1eld 111u!d 091 • uo!1ep19aJ une.11oJd 01190.l01Is X111003 aut(yods alp t!m ,Clduloo 01 pannbaJ oJc ,Clepunoq 01190/0115 100J OOZ 01(1 u!gl!m 0111 1111(3 told ,CJetl!«l!(0Jd 905!0021 '5661 `61 X''lnI ayl 110 Un \O115 aaeds lado uowwoa .10 510( 0111 'LE (1o!s!nlpgns 31(1 u!g1!m d!gs.1aumo 101 jo so!upq!suodsai ogl,lo Jasegpmd 101 IL!lualod 01 009011 S111011100J91' (1o!111!OOSSV SJ °LIMO OIOH 01(1 0l 03120.10103 0111111 pegs uo!le0lpap leld (uou 1(3113 •9£ •asegd lcld 1110ld quo 9u!luwgns 01 Joud `5°0101°5 ,Coua9.1auio Jol pap!nold s! 5500011 alenbapu 111111 0111.5(11 01 IIeys.I111nN and op pue 1311151(3 and 111001 01[1 1(1in+ 01eu!p3oo3 11egs ttw3gdd"paumo ayJ• 'S£ •9wz!leuy o1 Joud 9tnuueld ,Clunoj aueyOds 01 lenoldd" put: M01n 0J Jql p0UIUi4ns oq (lugs `sa!up31J pue 51 11011111.100 Jo 00ucualu!ew 1oJ SU0!S1AOJd .10(110 ,Cue yllm J01110901 'SUO93111501 pue Slmellano3 Jo /pue smel -Xq Jo /pue uo!lCJOdJoOul Jo 50(0!!1' uo!le!0osse ,5JOIIMO .C;Jodoid/sJaumoawog 0111 ,50 Xdoo v - pancdun Jo p0in35go lot( 5! sltnod ssa3311 111 a0u111s!p ups 11141 os p0u!t(1u11u1 pue papelsul oq 11 "1(s 9uldeosput"l . slnuJad 9u!pl!nq 9 abed 'saw( 101 lenp!nlpul put( s,CcmpeoJ way 51023(1105 511 nom se traps ,C .1eplliloq.101101 %a 1(11 011'31 (3111 1111115 mild ltlawdolanap 0115 and (1111d Blu1 1.9 ' and 17( ('6ZN uop(puo0 9u!uueld £6/5/8 pllawy) 'cc s6u!pu!d aw!110 uo(sue)x3 £ Extension of Time Findings 5. The dedication shall state: se File No. PE!i414 -8t Page 7 5. intersection and road improvements shall be constructed and phased as follows predicated on an agreement reached on or about August 4, 1994, between North Idaho Engineering and the Spokane County Engineer. Barker Road: Phase I: Construct Barker /Indiana intersection (Barker Road to be a 5 -lane section per the County's Special section for Barker Road).- Provide acceleration /deceleration lanes (sized per 1VSDOT Design manual), as well as inbound and outbound tapers. Phase 11: Construct Barker Road north to the Spokane River, and south to Mission Avenue, unless built out sooner as part of Phase VI. Phase VI: Construct Barker Road north to the Spokane River, and south to Mission Avenue, unless built out sooner as part of Phase li. Mission Avenue: Phase L: Construct Mission /Clark Pork (Harmony Lane) intersection. Construct north side of Mission Avenue (per the County's Special Section for Mission Avenue) from Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) to Barker. Provide inbound taper to Clark Pork (Harmony Lane) intersection. Phase 11I: Construct Mission/Potomac and Mission /Yukon intersections. Construct north side of Mission Avenue (per the County's Special Section for Mission Avenue) along the Mission Avenue frontage from the easterly plat boundary to Mission /Clark Fork (Harmony Lane). Provide inbound taper to the widened Mission /Yukon intersection from east of the easterly plat boundary. 6. Conditions of Approval require that Barker Road and . Mission Avenue improvements adjacent to Phase VI are to be completed prior to issuance ofa building permit for any projects on that parcel. 7. The aforementioned phasing is a minimum development program. Changes to this construction schedule may be implemented pending completion of the Traffic Impact Analysis for each phase of the development. S. Engineers Condition #21 of April 2, 1982 Hearing Examiner Committee Findings and Order required that a strip of property 15 feet in width along Barker Road be dedicated from Mission Avenue to the Spokane River. Since a portion of this strip is not controlled by the applicant this requirement for dedication is not applicable. Right -of -way along Barker Road within the original approved plat shall be dedicated at the time of final plat approval or vesting of any commercial rezone. Improvements to Barker Road front the Spokane River bridge on Barker to Mission Ave. shall still be required with the existing right -of -way per a phasing plan to be agreed to by the developer and approved by the County Engineer. 9. Regarding the May 19, 1995, redesign ]'Ian the following condition shalt apply: (1) Temporary cul -de -sacs shall be constructed at the terminus of Indiana Avenue, Tippi Canoe Lane cannot be used as a public road turn - around and all other streets that provide access to more than one lot shall also provide an acceptable turn- around. (2) Improvements to proposed roadways shall be as outlined in the approved conditions of approval or as amended by the overall traffic analysis currently being completed. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES . Any water service for this project shalt be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 2. The dedication shall state: The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 365.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by signing of a protest, petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. Provided, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or S« eeessor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation ofa ULID by either petition or resolution under RCW 36.94. 3. Applicant will Hake connection to Public Sewer System. Sewer Connection Permit is required. 4. Plans and specifications for the public facilities are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. Spokane County plan submittal requirements apply. e 0111 pue uo!s!Aipgns se!' u!tpIM papwsu! oq Ilegs'Jo/Can.nld JaLM pue 'luauu udor'Clawts pun 9utpptq ,Clunop `laujs!p uo!joaloid 0.111 woo! 0111 `Sau1J01(11111 (picot! (ills put: ,Clunoo,Cq pono.1ddu ucld JOW A\ 0111 of lumts.Ind `wals,Cs .1011M o99nd 011L :3IIow0Jl s SU!MOIIoJ 0111 tietwoo pegs uopeo!pap tied !nu o a „ s! SulojsXS Ja)eM pun sham owned Jo asn„ :owls pups pad OqJ uo aflenfluel ,CJOj130!pap 011.1 wals,Cs Japan\ panoJdde atp 0101(1100 ,CIuolouJsues op Josuods mid age Jo 0411ji134 of anp I!ttuad Su!pl!nq u pastpaJ .1aslgoJnd JOL.u/lol ,Cue ,1(q suuelo wOJJ ssolopuq Jo,(a,vnd agJ pue 131.051(1 glleaf -I ,Cluno3 auu Inds `ottulods Jo /Cep/Amoco ateyods 9tuploq uo!S!AO.II a apnlatn 11IM sp1011109(LJJe I13n)013Au03 011 j. 101d 0111 unp!M sponad St!pl!nq JoJ uoipe0!ldde 04 Joud saijiiotpnu tpleaq o)uudoJddu 0111,(11 0o!Joadsu! pue u10JSi(s J0111M op Jo uopaldutoo JoJ 1 0510 X111 u! `apiAoJ(1 IPM olnpagos 0111 agJ, '01111101105 own pue ueld pano.1ddu ayj IIITM aoucp.1o33u 11!'tools,Cs.laum\ 0113 JO uo!10nJ1suoo .1oj Josuods J13Id aql qp!M oputu uaaq ante! sp10U105uuJJ1 Iun10wp100 aleudo.dde 111111 11111(1 JaJUM !pus Jo 1Cdoo e uo lead pep; 0111 thew of Joud Xj1)J00 osee I1!M Jo/Ca/kind au •uoponpadOJ JoJ a19cJ!ns ,C0uanldsu1u1 e uo paitJp 04 !pm uo!p:0u!ua0 pue mid JateM plus •spaau an!40adsa.l emu XJspes ,Clalunbape 11IM pue sp.101(0.unbai .1!ag1111!A\ 03ueu1.l0J(100 11! 5! ueld aqi 1eg1 ueed.1OJUM p!LS Jo aotl 0111 uo `teed pup 0111 Jo Sully (q1 01 Joud `,CJploo !pm Joujs!p uop0010Jd a.11 alp pue (JoXanJnd) Jo lddns Ja1(M `satluotpne 11lleaq 0(1! •sa!1!JOtpn1 (pleaq aleudoJddu aye pot? 13u1s!p uogootoid 0.1u oq1 Xq panoxlde 11000 oAtq )s111J1 1110(1 .101uM pws 'JO/CO/1/4.111d JaluM aql ,Cq panoJdde oq wets asn uo!Joojo.ul 0 .1u pue 0511 UO!01151J.Ii O!JSatuop `asn 0psatuop .lot Olmlbapu sou!pouj J03eM .1oj uuld V •Jeld 0111 OAJas 01 pasodoid tools/Cs .1011M 0111)0 tam OD1AJOS pal /1000J 0111 tetIpM sop mid 0th 11'1(1 0300p1A0 111050.1(1 111 0111 11110 113111.1 0111 Sugy 01• .101Jd '!lad 0(11 JO 101 143110 0) alglllie.Ae s1( ,Clddns .IOJUM algelod ptiu ownbope U11113111 101.11SIG 1111C01 -1 ,(1111107 011110dS 0111 30 (10u31J5!jes 0(11 01 0p:Jj5(1011101) 1 .105110(15 0111 '1111d 111(111 011) Sulu 0) 1 01.1d 'g11e0H 30 010uu.1ed0U 011315 `(autaodS) Jaaui1uq leuo!90 1 OW ,Cq panoJdde uagM ,Clddns Jamt\ opgnd Suus!xa ue Xq oq Reps a31AJa5 Jaleh\ ,Clunoj ouuaods `sappp8 Jo Jo13anQ 0(11 1191101111 pa111tIIpJ003 a4 II fIS 031AJOS JB11'h\ C X1111104 ouinjodS '501111011p Joloalia 0144 Xq pazuotpnu se oq Mutts pogjoul lesods!p atuMas •1111(1 wog ag1Jo ImJI!wgns aql O4 Joud p0A!aaoJ 04 45111 saweduloo , (1!1!411 aye ,Cg Slual00sea 011130 lenOJdde uapij 13u)s!U 111le0H Xlunop auuyods aq1 pew J0au!9uq ,Clunoj ocelot's `sa!uudutoo ,(4!11111 ow 01 9u!uueld ,(lun03 auwjods ,(q uounq!JJsip .1oJ 11.103(4 Jo mid ,C.1uunuga.1d 0111 Jo soidoo uo poolop ul oq (legs sl11au10Sea ,(1111111 apuudaddV - polo] se sl00gs pagoepp: ,(Liu .10/pu13 pion.] Jo 11ld ,Cleuitu!la.ul ow 110 paten 110! su potI!sop ag pegs luld luau aqj „ •paZiJOtlllle oq 100 putts slllals,(s Iusodsip a91'Mos ops -uo 11311p!A1 Jo asp •011'5 Ol JOIJd 1o! 1(31 0) papiAO .1d 04 !pm a31AJOS 11311p!Alpt1! pue leld 0141 JOJ alg1IILM11 (pew 04 l(IM 111015,(5 JOMOS 011411(1 V„ :1eg1 130JJ0 0111 01 uone3!pap 0111 11! pa °lid 04 (lugs luautalels V 8 abed L8 ' al!J 'ZI 'I I '0I '6 8 'L 1111V3 11 AINI11O0 :INVNOdS •luautuedaa sop) 1(1 0111 X11 pa,wJddu pue p0Mo1noJ 04 Ol ale S1100e01 1/013 Send • pannba.l s! pt.wad uo!13auuoo Jamas •1015X5 .1OMas•O!lgnd of uo!430uuo3 oleo! (lugs Jue3yddv 'L •papuawe se `,Clunoj auuyods.103 Livid tools/Cs J0 11 h\ paleu!p .1oo3 aq4 t111M 0011cp1003e u1 pap!nad a1( (lees Joafoid S11.0 .10) 031AJOS JOIUM ,CuV '9 'b6'9£ JaldLgJ MD11 Japan p011010 1101111(050440 1101)110(1.101(310 (q UI'Ifl up uo!1ewJo 0111111!M 1.10 ul JoJ 11011113 swaulmnadun Jo 1111501 13 su 'lJadoJd 01(1 uo (s)utautssasse ,Cue 01 9uuoafgo alai (s)JOSS003ns Jo (5)1011111 001 ?e!gol ! lou pegs uo:ppuoo sup 'U9UTA021d 'q (101(1 ,(s)JauAto alp sapneou! ga!q" b6'9£ 403 (1131(3 M3 1 01 1011115111(1 potpaw uopneosaJ ' UPlfl op uo!lew4OJ ow 4su!e9e 110!1!10(1 1s0104d e Jo 9ui1I IIS •0tp Sq joafgo 01 lou .1agl.n1J puc :,(jJadad ,(s)Jauwo ow sapl1 311! uoppad 001gM `b6'9£ h \D>l 01 wensu1d pogpaul u01)1)0d ,( UI'lfl Jo uo 0( .10 uo14 e 110 (s)auleu . 03131(1 01 ,(1111103 OW oZIJOlp111 01 00J11 150.101111 111 (5).105500011S .10 (s)JalIMO aqj„ sOwpuld away) 110!51101x3 Extension of Time Findings applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as tire protection to each lot/tract prior to sale of each lot/tract and prior to issuance of a building permit for each tract. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS The applicant shall contact the Division of Buildings at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administeredlenforeed as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design /development concerns include: ADDRESSING, FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS; FIRE HYDRANT /FLOW; APPROVED WATER SYSTEMS; BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY; CONSTRUCTION TYPE; OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATIONEXITING; EXTERIOR WALL PROTECTION; AND ENERGY CODE REGULATIONS. (Note: The Division of Buildings reserves the right to confirm the actual address at the time of building permit.) WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF ANY FINAL PLAT: A traffic analysis shall be prepared for the Barker Road interchange and shall contain the following elements: a. .Site Map (illustrating the complete circulation system) b. Vicinity Map(s) (illustrating traffic distribution) c. Existing Transportation Conditions I. Existing average daily traffic 2. Existing AM and PM peak hour level of service 3. Existing AM and PM peak hour turning movements d . Projected Transportation Conditions with this Development I. Projected Average Daily Traffic 2. Projected AM and PM peak hour level of service 3. Projected AM and PM peak hour turning movements e. Recommended mitigating measures I . Mitigating measures sufficient to maintain existing Level of Service "D" 2. If the existing Level of Service "D" cannot be maintained a justification should be included NOTE: The ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual (5th Edition) shall be used as a basis to compute trip generation rates of the proposed developments. 2. That the applicant agree to fund and construct the necessary mitigating measures as outlined in the above traffic study. These mitigating measures must be approved by both WSDOT and Spokane County Engineers prior to the issuance of any building permits for this property. 3. Due to the trip generation potential, any further development other than what is proposed will require further review by WSDOT to assure additional trips are safely accommodated. NEW CONDITIONS OF FINAL PLAT APPROVAL Wherever the "New Conditions of Approval" replicate or conflict with the prior existing conditions of approval recited above, the "New Conditions of Approval" shall be controlling and shall amend and /or replace the terms and intent of the original conditions. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING File No. PE- r14148 1 Page 9 � The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots, or substantial modifications to the preliminary plat shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. Phased approval of the final plat is allowed but must be approved by the Division of Planning and other agencies who sign the final prat. Prior to recording of any final plat, the sponsor shall provide written approval of the final plat design from the Northwestern Pipeline Corporation. JoJ puoq e ldacae ,1011 o; ap!0ap X1118 J2011131It , (181103 31[1 `pale[orn S[ UO!smoJd 51111 J '.1aau19ut A1u11oj 941 , (q peld0000 uaaq ann1( luaUIdolanap alp JoJ s1.1'1d atp I pun pameJ3 oq 7011 [WA 1nuJad plUS • Jaaul9ua ,C1uno0 a111 1110.11 sal11!o8J L[Ons JoJ (1)0L0 1'6 U0I40as u! payloads se 1!uuad 8 pan!aaaJ 9tnnuy 1sJy 11101nog11,n OZO'71'6 uo110as u! pall:Jatunua 51107013 am H11m l0l1Da811oa 111 luatuosea peoJ QIenud 011 Jo 'AeM -Jo -p[9u oggnd arn;nj Jo 'posodoJd 3u!ls!xa ml u!guM salypoeJ Jaglo Jo pea! n 10OJ15iw0 pegs uosiod ou 'apoj 1Clunoj aueyodS 04130 080"7['6 110[100S -lad s'' 'Jaat1 :lug s,JOsuotl8 Dm Aq payu-Ioo pun pala[duloa sr aset[d amid am ssopul uollanJlscloo JoJ XultioD omolods dq pa ;da0ou aq !pm suuld ou pue pamo11e aq Xtul luOurc[olanap 0111 Jo asegd pa ;do ov -uou pu1: 1/0111 1108 n 1.15110.1111 SS00DB ON 'aounualuneul Jql 18111oj aun)lods dq pald000u pun pay!uao `polalciwoa s! asuld 10algns au) Ilnnl pasea[a.1 aq ;ou !pm spew) 0![gnd uo sd!J4s ss000l: ou loot auo •luauldolanap alp Jo amid luapuodap 11g1 JoJ sued Jo !ul1!ulgns my of JorJd pay!l.la0 pue polalduloo oq !lugs amid JouJd 011 `[nsods!p pun luacull:aal aseulnap Jo /pue 5500013 JoJ pseud Jagloue uo spuadap asngd auo pue paseyd sr laafoad a11; 31 •ulaulnoop mid rug ay 1111m uo!snl0u! .103 JoXOnJns 10 J001.1!91.1g s,JOSilods 0L[1 0l pap!noJd pun "(pump aueyods i(q powup aq IIIM a3nn3uel a9euJLJp `Ja0u13ug XitrnoD aueyods ay1 Cg a0unldaoon ueld 3u1MoEIo4 •lepl ptoy alp Jo Jnnauide Jo 1!ulJad 3u!pHnq Jo uo!lan.usuoo 830 0SI OlOJ 01 Joud aouelda0on maoup9tra X1unoa alp 0n1000J pegs 310 (10.1 0 e pun strorleln01t0 1/01110.1 'sueld a3u11uJp pun peoJ I"11L] •loalo.1d sup of algea!Idde aq Amu Imp sMnl Ieaapoj pun alums algn30de lie yllm 6ldmoo osln Hulls sueld a3etn8Jp pue pe0J !euld •lua18a•eunyy Ja)LmtuJOls JoJ saallapnl0 ,ClunoJ auuyods ow Jo uollip0 JLIOJJI1a DLp pun LIOpa11.11s11o3 memos pue pnoi1 .l0J spJepu1115 ,(111003 aun){ods 666[ atp of tuJOJuoa 1m1 suo!lelnaln0 a:M p pue peoJ pue 'uada! a3eu!eip a 'suuld o3lutulp pi peal mull :gargns hells 'U015mtisuM JO alms alp m pasuaall `Ja0U13t1] [nuo!ssaJo.d V :pasodoad se SIJadoJd Jo asn .to 1lm .1ad 3u!pinlq u JoastaloJ o1 .to!.Id ON1T 12NIJNa AO NOISIAIO A.LNROJ 2INV31oaS „Papuauly SC `aal1Ulllp.l0 SlOJI 4130111J0 6 4111103 auujlods alp Xq pa11:1113a Sn oq pals stain stopJn 1111 oa3 ail u!y ;1117 LC1lnrloe asn pun -1 'nuuod 94g1lnlq ,Sul: Jo Oounnss! 0114 01 Jo!Jd loin oq Hugs [`Modal plus Jo aInp pun Cr011t11!L'na pmze4 -003 XJL'UI LLII laad panolddt 010 JO .101(11113 04130 01111:115 to pay!luap! s0JnseatLI 9Ui4L' 1pul asogy •'uoisu.la OJOAOS .103 le!lualod 0111 3urne1,1 Se payquap! s adX; llos silly 'SUDS 11180I 1115 urepun 5 !plfl ' ( [1e 01 1 10 ads `seaau snopJezey -oa3 uimuoa leld [vuy otp Jo sa!Jtpunoq alp u!i[7!M passtduloOUa pull a4J,„ `op !lugs Ie[d pug; am 103 uolleoipap 0111 Alawpdo.1dde p01U !1!m pun passa.1ppe s! 1.8880a0 JoJ le!lualod ayl aJnsse o; pa .1lnboi Si "Cpms ['Mop ul OJOUI 1? lntH `LIOIIU l[ena pJeze11 -oa3 XJt m!!aid alp Jo matnOJ uodn 'punoj a4 Amu II 'sa!4!lrlfl put &1!Jaau!9ug ` O/111181d JO SLJO!S1A!a 0111104 IenoJdde 0Ig15SOd pun MalnaJ 203 ll0911:1IL'na pJLZL't[ -oa9 XJtuIlu11oid v 11u1gns pegs 1ueOgddn 01 '[tAOJdde .10 MOIA0J 118[d !My Cue 01 .1011d • 550!5010 OJOAOS J0I 1M11ucJod 0111 3u1nnt[ se aptleurp.a° meow`/ 1110111.13 1C1 autulods 0111 LCq payIluap! OJM y0ulm a7!s 110 51105 11180'5 415 1LIt!JUA 3ilgn saripilop! :Coning pas it ;unoJ auellods a1LL .130 .18 snopJezell -005 M minim pa ;tool s! laid .C.lculcul[aad alp sOIe0!pul scrum now leo!p.13 dlunoj otulods •071105 dear s,JOSSasse ale!.Idoaddu 041 goleuJ pegs pleas aqj [eno.1dde leld Ieu p0A!00 l aney 1ng1 sastmd /suo!1Jod 0501[1 pue pazileul Su!aq 80.28 ag13o pal u! pacepno 5(18111 atom 10 ono mimes HMIS Jor(ana IS s,luea11ddl ail lvld [1.1113 any" uoiuod e Jo 111? Rally o7 Jo1Jd •plan pun I[nu 0180004 111m 11:[d XJtlnmgaacl alp aslmua111O •papuaule se O0uempio uo!s!n!pgns ,Quno°, °nerds am Jo S I l'OO['Z1 uopoos I1 m a0utgdmoo [t!;umsges Jo 4Implly 13 uodn poJaprsuoa aq Aluo !pm 01111330 suo!sualxa luanbasgns uo!le0lldde LIOI5nalxa 044 Jo amp ail 18 suo!le!n30J luauLdo[anap pun dopod paldopu 01111OOIIaJ 01 pa818110 0 4 [I!m S110111/1103 put IvnoJddl; A.reu!uri[OJ(1 x111 `811'001 "ZI Jaldeyj 30 eualuo ally I11M sa!Iduloa 4uv0!I•[de a1( ; ' papuaule se `aaueulpJO uo!s!n!pgns ,(7171103 autyods alp Jo (0m!' Jo uo!sualx9) 81 1'0017 100e413 Jo suo!smoJd au; Japan passaooid aq ins au Jo u0!sualxa Jul (s)uo!le0l[ddy •EOOZ `l E -teal ut1H Jalnl 011 11111 alep clo!11:Jtdxa anog1 01p 01 Jaud sXep (pc) Ku1111 Iseal 113 110ueagdde atoll Jo uo!sualxa to [ 1 1113 lnugns Anal lueagdde a4J "EOOZ `i 1(5111 XHeoypads `S.180X (E) 00x[1 Jo3 [enoJdde I13ttop!ptto0 1101113 s! 1n[d £Jnu!turlaJd •pa.neduu Jo pa .1nosgo 1ou s! su!od ssa0ae It a0uels!p 1119!5 ;13111 os pau18Juteu1 pun papist!! aq Begs 3ulde0spue-1 'slnuaad 9U pllnq Kee Jo 05110[0] 01 Jo!Jd loa[OJd 0y1 103 aaullJne5 a[gm!ns aatpo Jo puoq a0UPWJOJJad e tput pal;lwgns 04 [It's aauThsap uilILle[d Jo uo!s!n!0 0111 Jo Jo10ang 041 04 alquldaaa13 aaunualtl!etu 044 JoJ suo!s!noJd pue alnpagos Sul ;ueld `veld adeospuul ay!oads v 0 1 a . S 49 - 64f 4 ON al!d s6ulpul j aural to uoisualx3 Extension of Time Findings SPOKANE COUNTY UTiLiTES DEPARTMENT James Richardson, Associate Planner File NO.'PE;1414 -81 Page 11 the improvements and may require the project sponsor to build and certify the facilities prior to final plat. 4. This proposed subdivision or development proposal is located within a drainage basin that has been identified by the Spokane County Engineer's and Utilities offices as having stormwater runoff problems. Since this proposed subdivision or development proposal is affected by or is a contributor to stormwater flows, property owners should participate in the planning and implementation of a future basimvide stormwater management system. The following statement shall be placed in the plat dedication: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to join in any County - approved stormwater management program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fixed through public hearings for service or benefit obtained by the planning, design, constructing, maintaining or operation of stormwater control facilities." 5. The Spokane County Engineer has reviewed the extension of time and will require that the proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 99 -0265, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 6. All previous imposed County Engineering Conditions of Approval are still applicable. This proposed subdivision or development proposal is located within a drainage basin that has been identified by the Spokane County Engineer's and Utilities offices as having stormwater runoff problems. Since this proposed subdivision or development proposal is affected by or is a contributor to stormwater flows, property owners should participate in the planning and implementation of a future basinwide stormwater management system. The following statement shall be placed in the plat dedication: "The owner(s) or successor(s), in interest agree to join in any County - approved stormwater management program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fixed through public hearings for service or benefit obtained by the planning, design, constructing, maintaining or operation of stormwater control facilities." NOTE: No other new conditions of appr were requested by the reviewing agencies listed below. Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with the appropriate processing fee payable to the Spokane County Division of Planning, within 14 (fourteen) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Spokane County Division of Planning at 477 -7200. DATED Tut IS 20" DAY OF JUNE, 2000 C: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads, Scott Engelhard Spokane County Division of Engineering, Developer Services, Bill Hemmings Spokane County Division of' Utilities, Water Resources, Jim Red Division of Utilities, Stormwater Utility, Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District, Steve 1- lolderby Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry Files (6 copies) Stanton - Spokane L.P., 16720 N. E. 116'11 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 Riverwalk 50 L. L. C., 16720 N. E. 1 16'h Street, Redmond, WA 98052 Shorewood Homes, 3901 Schreiber Way, Coeur d'Alene, ID 83815 Wel Co. Group, c/o I1 &1-1 Property, 827 -108'h Ave., NE, 13ellevue, WA 98004 Pacific Properties, 14410 Bel Red Road, I3ellevue, WA 98007 K.C. Construction, P O Box 1 1 1455, Hayden Lake, ID 83835 CLC, 707 West 7th, Suite 200, Spokane, WA 99204 II33NION3 AINI100 3MDI0dS 8661 LO inr BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLA I I ^9u IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION OF ) TIME REQUEST FOR PE- 1414 -81 / PUDE -1 -82 / ) FINDINGS OF FACT, ZE- 92 -81, RIVERWALK, AN APPROVED ) CONCLUSIONS AND PRELIMINARY PLAT, PRELIMINARY ) DECISION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND ZONE ) RECLASSIFICATION ) THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Ed Dean, Stanton - Spokane L. P. has been received and decided upon, pursuant to the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance (Section 12.100.118) and RCW 58.17.140. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by the Spokane County Director of Building and Planning. 2. The original development proposal was to subdivide approximately 118 acres into 364 lots for manufactured homes and a single commercial lot. The original proposal also included a zone reclassification from Agricultural (A) to Residential Manufactured Home (RMH) with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay zone and to Commercial (C) under the now expired, Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. 3. The subject preliminary plat, planned unit development and zone reclassification were approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on April 2, 1982. 4. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) previously established as Agricultural (A) zoning in 1957 (ZE- 286 -57) and redesignated to Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) on January 1, 1991 pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the proposal does conform to the requirements of the proposed Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) zone. 5. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions. These criteria are found in Section 12.100.118 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this decision. Section 12.100.1 16 states, "Approval of a preliminary subdivision, large lot subdivisions, short subdivisions, and binding site plans shall automatically expire five years after preliminary approval is granted unless a time extension is approved for the project." and Section 12.100.118 follows with "The Director may administratively approve an extension provided there are no significant changed conditions which would render filing of the plat or binding site plan contrary to the public health, safety or general welfare, and further provided one or more of the following circumstances is found to apply:" The following are the relevant sections of Section 12.100.1 18 and the Division of Building & Planning response: IN'I'E..R OFFICE MAIL DIVISION OF ENGINEERING ATTENTION PAT HARPER Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 / PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 Page 2 1. That some portion of the existing preliminary subdivision or binding site plan has been finalized since the project was approved and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval; RESPONSE: The last extension of time was approved June 16, 1995 and eight phases of the preliminary plat have been finalized since that extension of time. Riverwalk First Addition recorded on 8 -9 -95 Riverwalk Second Addition recorded on 6 -12 -96 Riverwalk Third Addition recorded on 6 -12 -96 Riverwalk Fourth Addition recorded on 6 -11 -97 Riverwalk Fifth Addition recorded on 6 -11 -97 Riverwalk Sixth Addition recorded on 5 -15 -97 Riverwalk Seventh Addition recorded on 10 -2 -96 Riverwalk Ninth Addition recorded on 6 -9 -98 2. That the preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan remains generally consistent with original plat or binding site plan that was approved, and the sponsor has taken substantial steps toward finalizing the plat or binding site plan, which shall include one, but is not limited to, the following: a) surveying the lots within the development; b) arranging for public services to the site; c) obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan; d) the completion of studies or other requirements which were part of preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan approval; RESPONSE: The preliminary plat remains consistent with the original preliminary plat that was approved. Riverwalk First through Riverwalk Seventh Additions and Riverwalk Ninth Addition are constructed and comprise approximately 246 of the original 365 lots approved. 3. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was conditioned upon the extension ofpublic services which are not yet available. This provision shall not apply to public utility extensions which the project sponsor would normally fund RESPONSE: NA 4. That administrative delays have caused the inability of the applicant to finalize the plat within the five (5) year time period. RESPONSE: NA 6. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area of the preliminary plat as Urban. The Comprehensive Plan designation remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. Extension of Time Findings 7. No additional conditions have been recommended by reviewing agencies, including the Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads, the Spokane Regional Health District, Spokane County Division of Utilities, and the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning. 8. This is the eighth (8 request for a time extension. The total life of the preliminary plat has been approximately sixteen years. 9. The applicant/owner should show continued progress toward complying with Section 12.100.118, of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time. BASED UPON A REVIEW of (a) the criteria for approving an extension of time of the expiration date for a preliminary plat and (b) the above Findings of Fact, an extension of time request for application PE- 1414 -81, Riverwalk, is hereby APPROVED for one (1) year until July 1, 1999. Those previous conditions of approval specified in the Spokane County Planning Department's Findings of Fact, Conclusion and Decision dated June 16, 1995, together with the following updated conditions. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & PLANNING (UPDATED) 1. Subsequent extension of time will only be considered upon a. finding of substantial compliance with Section 12.100.118, of the Subdivision Ordinance; otherwise the preliminary subdivision approval will become null and void. 2. This time extension is approved until July 1, 1999, the applicant may request an extension of time at least 30 days prior to the above expiration date. DATED THIS 1 DAY OF JULY, 1998 Louis Webster, AICP Associate Planner PE- 1414 -81 / PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 Page 3 DECISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with the appropriate processing fee to the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 / PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 Page 4 If you have any questions, please call the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning at 456 -3675. c: County Engineer County Utilities Regional Health District File Stanton - Spokane L.P., 16720 N. E. 116' Street, Redmond, WA 98052 Riverwalk 50 L. L. C., 16720 N. E. 116'" Street, Redmond, WA 98052 Wel Co. Group, c/o H &H Property, 827 -108 Ave., NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 Pacific Properties, 14410 Bel Red Road, Bellevue, WA 98007 K.C. Construction, P 0 Box 11 1455, Hayden Lake, ID 83835 s 5i?fgg9 BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND NI V CEI VED MAY 19 1999 IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION OF ) TIME REQUEST FOR PE- 1414 -81 / PUDE -1 -82 / ) FINDINGS OF FACT, ZE- 92 -81, RIVERWALK, AN APPROVED ) CONCLUSIONS AND PRELIMINARY PLAT, PLANNED UNIT ) DECISION DEVELOPMENT AND ZONE ) RECLASSIFICATION ) THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Inland Pacific Engineering has been received and decided upon, pursuant to the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance (Section 12.100.118) and RCW 58.17.140. FINDINGS OF FACT SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by the Spokane County Director of Building and Planning. 2. The original development proposal was to subdivide approximately 118 acres into 364 lots for manufactured home, single family residences and a single commercial lot. The original proposal also included a zone reclassification from Agricultural (A) to Residential Manufactured Home (P . 1H) with a Planned Unit D eve lo p r nen t (PI in) Overlay zone and to Commercial (C) under the now expired, Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. 3. The subject preliminary plat, zone reclassification and Planned Unit Development (PUD) were approved by the Wearing Examiner Committee on April 2, 1982. The revised preliminary plat and PUD were approved on June 16, 1995 4. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) previously established as Agricultural (A) zoning in 1957 (ZE -286 -57) and redesignated to Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) on January 1, 1991 pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the proposal does conform to the requirements of the proposed Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) zone. 5. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions. These criteria are found in Section 12.100.118 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this decision. Section 12.100.1 16 states, "Approval of a preliminary subdivision, large lot subdivisions, short subdivisions, and binding site plans shall automatically expire five years after preliminary approval is granted unless a time extension is approved for the project." and Section 12.100.118 follows with "The Director may administratively approve an extension provided there are no significant changed conditions which would render filing of the plat or binding site plan contrary to the public health, safety or general welfare, and further provided one or more of the following circumstances is found to apply:" The following are the relevant sections of Section 12.100.118 and the Division of Building & . ,, ; Extension of Time Findings PE- 14I4 -82 / PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 Page 2 Planning response: 1. That some portion of the existing preliminary subdivision or binding site plan has been finalized since the project was approved and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval; RESPONSE: The last extension of time was approved July 8, 1998 and nine phases of the preliminary plat have been finalized since the preliminary plat was originally approved. Riverwalk First Addition Riverwalk Second Addition Riverwalk Third Addition Riverwalk Fourth Addition Riverwalk Fifth Addition Riverwalk Sixth Addition Riverwalk Seventh Addition Riverwalk Eighth Addition Riverwalk Ninth Addition 2. That the preliminary subdivision, .short subdivision, or binding site plan remains generally consistent with original plat or binding site plan that was approved, and the sponsor has taken substantial steps toward finalizing the plat or binding site plan, which shall include one but is not limited to, the following: a) surveying the lots within the development; b) arranging for public services to the site; c) obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan; d) the completion of studies or other requirements which were - part ofpreliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding - site plan approval; RESPONSE: The proposed preliminary plat remains consistent with the original preliminary plat that was approved. Riverwalk First through Riverwalk Ninth Additions are constructed and comprise approximately 318 of the original 365 lots approved. 3. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This provision shall not apply to public utility extensions which the project sponsor would normally fund. RESPONSE: NA 4. That administrative delays have caused the inability of the applicant to finalize the plat within the five (5) year time period RESPONSE: The applicant identifies no administrative delays having delayed the finalization of the plat. Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -82 / PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 6. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area of the preliminary plat as Urban. The Comprehensive Plan designation remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. 7. No additional conditions have been recommended by reviewing agencies, including the Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads, the Spokane Regional Health District, Spokane County Division of Utilities, and the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning. 8. This is the ninth (9 request for a time extension. The total life of the preliminary plat has been approximately seventeen (17) years. 9. The applicant/owner should show continued progress toward complying with Section 12.100.118, of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time. BASED UPON A REVIEW of (a) the criteria for approving an extension of time of the expiration date for a preliminary plat and (b) the above Findings of Fact, an extension of time request for application PE- 1414 -81, Riverwalk, is hereby APPROVED for one (1) year until July 1, 2000. Those previous conditions of approval specified in the Spokane County Planning Department's Findings of Fact, Conclusion and Order dated June 16, 1995, together with the following updated conditions. . • - SPOKANE COUNTY- DIVISION OF BUILDING & PLANNING (UPDATED) 1. Subsequent extension of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial compliance with Section 12.100.118, of the Subdivision Ordinance; otherwise the preliminary subdivision approval will become null and void. 2. This time extension is approved until July 1, 2000, the applicant may request an extension of time at least 30 days prior to the above expiration date. DATED THIS I F DAY OF MAY, 1999 Louis Webster, AICP Associate Planner DECISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 Page 3 1 Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -82 / PUDE -1 -82 / 7E -92 -81 Page 4 Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with the appropriate processing fee to the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning at 477 -3675. c: County Engineer County Utilities Regional Health District File Stanton- Spokane L.P., 16720 N. E. 116' Street, Redmond, WA 98052 Riverwalk 50 L. L. C., 16720 N. E. 1 16 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 Shorewood Homes, 3901 Schreiber Way, Coeur d'Alene, ID 83815 Wel Co. Group, c/o H &H Property, 827 -108 Ave., NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 Pacific Properties, 14410 Bel Red Road, Bellevue, WA 98007 K.C. Construction, P 0 Box 111455, Hayden Lake, ID 83835 IPE, 707 West 7 Suite 200, Spokane, WA 99204 • f�= IN THE MATTER OF GRANTING AN EXTENSION- ) OF IIMEtREQUESTED FOR .PE 1414 =`S1 %'P- UDE- 1 -82'% i) ZE -92 �81;_!RIVERWALK" (PREVIOUSLY "RIVERWAY VILLA ") ) AN APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT, PRELIMINARY ) FINDINGS OF FACT, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND ZONE CHANGE ) CONCLUSIONS AND AND ) DECISION GRANTING APPROVAL OF REVISED PRELIMINARY ) PLAT AND PRELIMINARY PUD SITE DEVELOPMENT ) PLAN FOR "RIVERWALK ". ) THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Michael A. Hunt pursuant to a letter dated August 16, 1994, has been received and decided upon (after an extensive review, redesign and coordination with the applicant's engineers and the various agencies), pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter III, Section G), Spokane County Zoning Code and RCW 58.17.140. AND THIS MAI 1'ER, a request for approval of a "Revised Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site Development Plan (PUD) of RIVERWALK" (previously Riverway Villa) as submitted by Inland Pacific Engineering on May 19, 1995. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS . The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by Spokane County Planning. 2. The proposal for the time extension is located south of both the Spokane River and the Washington State Parks Department's Centennial Trail property, east of and adjacent to Barker Road, and north of and adjacent to Mission Avenue in Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 45 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. 3. The Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) plans were approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on April 2, 1982. The development then consisted of a manufactured home subdivision on 118 acres for 365 lots including open space and one commercial lot. The preliminary plat approval also included a rezone from Agricultural (A) to Residential Manufactured Home (RMH) with a (PUD) Overlay zone and to Commercial (C) under the now expired, Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. Such zone reclassifications are accomplished as each phase of the preliminary plat is finalized and recorded with the County Auditor. No portion of the project has been recorded to date. 4. The Preliminary Plat, PUD and Zone Change original approvals were, in part, based on an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared for the proposed project. However, numerous changes have occurred since 1982, which require mitigating measures as new conditions of approval. 5. The Findings of the August 5, 1993, Time Extension decision are included by reference with this action to assure clarification of the below findings, decision and conditions. 6. At the time of the preliminary approvals, April 2, 1982, the Comprehensive Plan designated this area as URBAN Category. The location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone. The Comprehensive Plan was adopted late 1980 with an effective date of January 1, 1981. The URBAN designation has remained the same since the 1982 preliminary approvals. The approved original plans and zone changes continue to conform to the adopted Comprehensive Plan, including the May 19, 1995, Revised Preliminary Plans. 7. On February 24, 1983, the sponsor submitted a Final PUD Site Development Plan for the southern portion (S1/2) of the project and requested a change of condition to postpone the Final PUD hearing of the northern portion (N112) for three (3) years. The request was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee (HEC) on April 14, 1983. The approved Final PUD Site Development Plan for the S1/2 of the site consisted of a maximum of 178 lots on approximately 50 acres, which excluded the proposed commercial property at the southwest corner. The approved Final S1 /2 PUD Site Development Plan was different from the Preliminary PUD Development Plan stamped "Received November 12, 1981." Larger residential Lots, consolidated open space, elimination of recreational improvements and redesign of the roads were approved in 1983. The HEC approved a redesign of the PUD that clearly deviated from the original conceptual "preliminary PUD" map stamped "Received November 12, 1981." The remaining NI /2 of the Preliminary PUD was conditioned to acquire Final PUD Site Development Plan approval no later than May 1, 1986. After the Planning Department sent a late Expiration Notice to the sponsor, a Time BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING RF(FNED JUN 1 6 1995 SPOWE LAMIY ENGINEER June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 2 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 7. continued Extension Application was accepted July 1986, processed, public notice given and the project was granted approval approximately October 1986. Therefore, this deadline was administratively (see Finding No. 8., 10. and 11. below) extended which followed with four additional administrative time extensions (see Finding No. 12. below). As a condition of the last Time Extension approved on August 5, 1993, a one (1) year deadline was imposed on this north Final PUD Site Development Plan approval with an expiration date of September 1, 1994. On March 24, 1994, before the above expiration date for the north Final PUD, the sponsor submitted an overall (N1 /2 and 51/2) Final PUD Site Development Plan for administrative review and approval along with this time extension application. Since that submittal the sponsor has proposed and received administrative approval to submit a revised overall "preliminary PUD," which improves the lot design, open space and road design. May 19, 1995, (over one year later) the revised "preliminary PUD" was submitted and will be made part of this time extension decision to create a clear record of the "revised preliminary plat" and the "revised preliminary PUD." 8. On October 22, 1985, with Resolution Number 85 -0900 the Board of County Commissioners adopted the new Spokane County Zoning Code to be effective January 1, 1986. The new Chapter 14.704, Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay Zone, established an administrative process to approve Final PUD site plans. The previous Zoning Ordinance had required public hearings before the Hearing Examiner Committee to approve Final PUD site plans. 9. The project area was zoned Agricultural (A) at the time of the April 2, 1982, preliminary approvals. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is presently zoned Urban Residential -3.5 (UR. -3.5), previously established as Agricultural (A) zoning in 1957 (ZE- 286 -57) and redesignated to UR -3.5 on January 1, 1991, consistent with the PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT THE SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING CODE. Note, as each phase of the preliminary plat is finalized and recorded with the County Auditor the existing UR- 3.5 zoning will be reclassified to comply with the original zone change approval on April 2, 1982, pursuant the PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT. The project area with the old approved Residential Mobil Home (RMH) Zone will be substituted with the present Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) and the present PUD overlay zone. The old approved Commercial (C) Zone will be substituted with the present Community Business (B -2). Any development of the proposed plat and planned unit development will need to conform with the current Zoning, Planned Unit Development, and Subdivision standards. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the revised proposal as conditioned will conform to the requirements of the approved zone change to UR -7 Zone with PUD Overlay Zone and the B -2 Zone. 10. March 18, 1986, Spokane County adopted specific criteria for administratively considering the Extension of Time regarding the expiration of preliminary subdivisions. Extension of time decisions no longer require a public hearing before the HEC. The time extension criteria is found in Chapter III, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance (Board of County Commissioner Resolution Number 86- 0246). 11. October 1986, the Planning Department granted its first administrative (without public hearing) time extension for 2 years under the authority of Chapter III, Section G of the amended Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. This 1986 Extension of Time approval amended and extended the previous conditions of approval regarding all specific deadlines of the April 14, 1986, Hearing Examiner Committee decision. This deadline extension included the N1 /2 Final PUD deadline of May 1, 1986 (see Finding No. 7. above). 12. This Time Extension application is the seventh (7th) request for a time extension. The total life of the Preliminary Plat, PUD and Zone Change has been 13 years and 2 months: • April 1982 to April 1983 Preliminary approvals - HEC • April 1983 to April 1986 3 years granted with change of conditions - HEC • Nov 1986 to Dec 1988 2 years (see Finding No. 11. above) - Ping. Dept. • Dec 1988 to Jan 1990 2 years - Ping. Dept. • Jan 1990 to Jan 1992 2 years - Ping. Dept. • Jan 1992 to Jan 1993 1 year - Ping. Dept. March 4, 1993 Time Extension Denied for lack of progress March 12, 1993 Appeal of Denial and additional information provided May 24, 1993 Time Extension administratively Approved with updated conditions June 3, 1993 Appeal of new and updated conditions -of- approval Aug 19, 1993 Hearing Examiner Committee public hearing scheduled and advertised July 1993 additional information provided July 27, 1993 appeal withdrawn by Jim Reuter July 29, 1993 withdrawal confirmed by project legal council, F. J. Dullanty, Jr. Aug 5, 1993 administratively amended the May 24, 1993 Time Extension conditions • August 1993 to September 1994 1 year - Ping. Dept. August 23, 1993 HEC withdrawal of appeal ORDER (see Finding No. 13. below) June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 3 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 12. continued The above stated chronology does not include the processing time for which approval had lapsed during review or appeal of decisions for each time extension request. Complete and timely requests for any future time extensions shall be consistent with RCW 58.17.140 and Spokane County Planning Subdivision Ordinance. Timely requests for consideration of time extensions are the applicant/developer's responsibility as notices of expiration of approval by Spokane County Planning are not regularly provided. When said notices are provided they are done so only on a courtesy basis. 13. The appeal of the conditions of approval added to the administrative May 24, 1993, Time Extension approval was advertised and scheduled for the August 19, 1993 Hearing Examiner Committee (HEC) public hearing. Due to subsequent amendments made to these conditions in the administrative August 5, 1993, Time Extension approval, the appellant, Jim Reuter, withdrew his appeal by letter dated July 27, 1993, as did the project attorneys by letter dated July 29, 1993. This appeal agenda item was not presented at the August 19, 1993, HEC hearing. Later, on August 23, 1993, the Hearing Examiner Committee signed FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER which states: ORDER -- "The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the above Findings of Fact and Conclusion, accepts the withdrawal by Jim Reuter, of the application of the Preliminary Plat of PE- 1414 -81 described in the application known a Riverway Villa." MOTION -- "UNANIMOUS TO APPROVE THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RIVERWAY VILLA AND RENDER THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND APPEAL OF THE EXTENSION OF TIME NULL AND VOID." This order and motion was based on Finding No. 2, which incorrectly states: "2. On July 29, 1993, Spokane County Planning received a written request from the appellant, Jim Reuter, to withdraw the preliminary plat of Riverway Villa. The Hearing Examiner Committee, by accepting the withdrawal, renders the preliminary plat and appeal of the extension of time null and void." The evidence within file PE- 1414 -81, including the withdrawal letters, indicates the Preliminary Plat and PUD sponsors clearly intended to keep the project alive and, in fact, only requested to WITHDRAW THE APPEAL from the August 19, 1993, HEC hearing agenda, since the issues with the conditions of approval had been administratively resolved with the County Prosecutor's Office and Spokane County Planning administration. While the August 23, 1993, Hearing Examiner Committee FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER could have been written more clearly, all references to withdrawal applies only to the appeal and not the overall preliminary approvals. 14. This development and its approvals have exceeded its four (4) year grace period (the first 3 year expiration period and 1 additional year) where additional conditions cannot be applied to the original approval, as provided in RCW 58.17.140, EXTENSIONS. All time extensions thereafter may have additional conditions of approval added or updated as each subsequent time extension is granted. The upgrading of conditions allows Spokane County to bring development approvals into compliance with present adopted policy and regulations while addressing current conditions and resolving current problems or impacts. 15.. The application for this time extension has been evaluated using the below adopted criteria. These criteria are found in Chapter III, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this time extension decision. Section G states; Approval of a preliminary subdivision shall automatically expire three years after preliminary approval is granted unless a time extension is applied for." and follows with "Upon application for time extension , the Planning Director or designee may administratively approve extensions for up to three (3) year periods provided at least one of the following circumstances is found to apply: 1. That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the last extension was granted and the remaining lots would fornz a unified development consistent with the original approval RESPONSE: No portion of the site has been finalized or recorded as a final plat. However, Phase 1 (40 lots in the southwest corner with a public sewer system and excluding the commercial site) is presently being reviewed for Final Plat approval to be recorded with the County Auditor. 2. That the preliminary plat as approved remains consistent with the Generalized Comprehensive Plan for Spokane County insofar as density and other development provisions apply, and the sponsor has taken substantial steps towards finalizing his plat, which shall include but not be limited to: June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 4 and a Revised Preliminary Plat /PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 15. continued 2. continued a. surveying the lots within the development, b. arranging for public services to the site, c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary plat, d. the completion of studies or other requirements which were part of preliminary plat approval. RESPONSE: Correspondence from North Idaho Engineering dated August 16, 1994, indicates that progress has been made towards finalizing the project. The progress is summarized as: a. Survey calculations of the entire first 37 (now 40) lot Final Plat Map have been performed. b. Public utilities to the site have been arranged. c. Construction financing has been secured and is in place pending release of construction permits by the Spokane County Engineering Department. d. Sanitary Sewer Improvement Plans including lift station design have been submitted to the Spokane County Utilities Department. f. The Final PUD Plan for the southerly 1/2 of Riverway Villa has been approved and the northerly 1/2 has been submitted for administrative review and approval as provided for in Chapter 14.704, Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay Zone of the Spokane County Zoning Code. g. The mitigation agreement with the Central Valley School District has been executed. h. Landscaping plans for Indiana Avenue have been submitted. i. The draft declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions, articles of incorporation and bylaws have been submitted. j. Soils testing has been completed the results of which have been incorporated into the redesign of street and storm drain plans. Since the above August 16, 1994, letter, North Idaho Engineering and Inland Pacific Engineering indicates that additional progress has been made: 1. The water plan for the first phase has been approved. The water system with fire hydrants have been installed for the fast phase. Consolidated Irrigation Water District has accepted the water system and the contractor is has completed the pressure tests and was in the process of flushing the system to pass health tests. 2. A dry]ine sewer system has been installed for the first phase. 3. Engineering design and plans have been prepared and submitted to WSDOT for boring under the freeway. WSDOT has approved a boring permit. 4. Engineering design and plans have been prepared and submitted to WSDOT for Barker & Freeway interchange right turn lane improvements. WSDOT has approved the I -90 eastbound right turn lane permit. 5. Electric, cable and gas utilities have been installed for the first phase. 6. Street grading for the first phase is completed and "red top" surveyed and staked ready for asphalt. 7. Curb forms have been partially installed along Indiana for the first phase. It was "red top" surveyed and staked ready for asphalt. 8. A model home building permit was issued and was being constructed. 9. Redesign of the "preliminary plat" and "preliminary PUD" plans are complete. 3. That at the rime preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This provision shall not apply to public utility extension which the project sponsor would normally fund. RESPONSE: This condition does not apply to the first 38 lots however the developer has as indicated in the August 16, 1994, North Idaho Engineering letter that preparation of plans and documents to facilitate future phases have been expedited, including public sewer for the entire project. 16. Spokane County Planning does find that the applicant has taken significant steps to finalize all phases of the preliminary plat of record prior to the September 1, 1994, expiration of the preceding time extension (6th extension). During this present time extension review period additional progress has also been made as indicated in FINDING 15. above. The present owners have purchased the entire preliminary plat. The sewer system has been designed, sized and partially installed to serve the entire preliminary plat, considerable engineering has been accomplished and is currently underway for a major portion of the preliminary plat and a redesign of the preliminary plat/PUD has been completed. Therefore the applicant/owner has demonstrated sufficient progress to comply with the requirements of Chapter III, Section G, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance for extending the expiration date of the preliminary approvals for three years. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 5 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 17. Additional conditions for this time extension have been recommended by the various -reviewing agencies and departments, including Spokane County Planning, the County Division of Engineering and Roads, the County Division of Utilities, the County Health District the County Division of Buildings, the Washington State Department of Transportation, Central Valley School District, the County Parks Department and Fire District No. 1. Said conditions shall be included in the appropriate sections of this decision and shall not preclude previous conditions of approval for time extensions unless specifically stated. If conditions conflict, the most current condition shall apply. 18. The Spokane County Parks Department has commented on the proposed Preliminary Plat and PUD time extension pursuant a letter dated February 15, 1995. The Parks Department has requested a voluntary agreement be completed between the Parks Department and the property owner to mitigate impacts to the County Park system. A previous February 1, 1995, letter from Parks Director, Sam Angove, also indicates their desire to purchase 7.4 acres of the PUD open space adjacent the Centennial Trail at the north end of the project. County legal counsel has indicated such agreements may be required. Spokane County Planning recommends the property owner negotiate with the Spokane County Parks Department to provide for appropriate capital facilities as required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 58.17.110. Approval of this time extension should include conditions requiring that provisions for appropriate facilities be in place prior to recording this Final Plat in the form of dedication of park land or a written agreement between the owner and the Spokane County Parks Department. Note, property from this project along the Spokane River was dedicated to Washington State Parks for the Centennial Trail. 19. The Central Valley School District No. 356 has commented on the proposed Preliminary Plat and PUD time extension pursuant a letter dated February 21, 1995. The District has indicated that existing school facilities are inadequate to serve the proposed Plat and PUD and wishes to negotiate with the owner t� provide adequate capital facilities as required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 58.17.110. Review by County legal counsel indicates the condition requested by the School District can be required for developments. Approval of this time extension should include conditions requiring that provisions for appropriate facilities be in place prior to recording the Final Plat in the form of a written agreement between the owner and the school district. Note, the school district indicates there is an existing signed agreement. However, the request to add the standard condition will assure that the existing and signed agreement will continue to be required and maintained throughout the finalization of this project. 20. The following facts and conclusions are also relevant. a. The applicant/owner should continue to show substantial progress toward complying with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time for the remaining phases of the approved Preliminary Plat / PUD which have not been filed. b. By reference FINDINGS of all previous approvals are specifically incorporated herein unless otherwise stated. An attempt to include all previous and applicable Spokane County Planning CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL within this time extension has been made by Spokane County Planning. Due to the complex nature of this file omissions may have occurred. If further clarification is necessary regarding previous conditions, the file record and documents continue to be the authority and shall be used to resolve such questions /determinations. c. A part of the northern portion of the approved preliminary plat of record fell under the jurisdiction of the Washington State Shoreline Management Act, RCW 90.58, and the Spokane County Shoreline Program, WAC 173 -19 -400. Creation of the Washington State Centennial Trail along the Spokane River has removed portions of the original site from Shoreline jurisdiction. Review of the Revised PUD site plan for the northern portion of the preliminary plat shows the portions of the site that is still within the Shorelines area, designated "Conservancy." About 15 of the proposed lots are partly within this 200 foot shoreline boundary; however, each of these lots has a building site that is outside the 200 foot boundary. d. The site is located within an area of Spokane County which was removed from the sewer exemption area on July 1, 1994 by the Washington State Health Board pursuant to WAC 246 - 272 -100. The site is also located within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA). Any future time extension requests may be affected by the new exemption boundary; however, the project is to be served by public sewer. 21. The site is located within the Public Transit Benefit Area (PTBA). Route # 18, Broadway Feeder, provides connecting service to the Valley Park and Ride lot located on University Avenue and 4th Avenue. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 6 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 22. The Spokane County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a PRINCIPLE ARTERIAL and Mission Avenue as a MINOR ARTERIAL. The existing roadway widths are inconsistent with that specified in the adopted Arterial Road Plan. In order to implement the Plan the County Engineer has requested a 5 foot reserve strip along Barker Road and a 10 foot reserve strip along Mission Avenue to be designated as a Future Acquisition Area. Preliminary plat approval also required dedication of an additional 15 feet of right -of -way on Barker Avenue and dedication of 10 feet on Mission Road. Sidewalks are required along these arterial roads fronting and within the plat. The Washington State Department of Transportation has recommended conditions to mitigate impacts to the Barker Road and Interstate -90 interchange. Those recommendations have been incorporated into this decision. The Spokane County Engineering Department has met with the developers representative and reached an agreement/understanding with regards to phasing and development related improvements to Barker Road and Mission Avenue. That understanding and conditions thereof have been incorporated into the Engineer's conditions as set forth in this document. 23. The proposed plat will be served by a public water system. Waste water disposal will be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, which involves an approved public sewer system with pressurized lines to the sewer trunkline south of Interstate 90. 24. Recognizing the conditions of approval and Spokane County development standards, appropriate provisions have been made to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare and that the public use and interest will be served by plating the proposed subdivision as conditioned. The subdivision proposal is generally consistent with RCW 58.17 and the County subdivision regulations, promoting the public health, safety and general welfare in accordance with standards established by the state and Spokane County. Spokane County Planning has considered the provision of public facilities cited in RCW 58.17.110 (2). More specifically: a. open spaces b. drainage ways c. public and/or private rights -of -way d. transit e. potable water f. sanitary waste disposal g. parks and recreation facilities h. playgrounds i. schools and school grounds j. sidewalks 25. The delay in issuing this time extension is the result of (1) change of project sponsors, (2) change of project engineers, (3) resignation of County planner assigned to this project (4) an extensive review of the large thirteen year old file, (5) the physical reorganization of the file (6) two reorganizations of planners within Spokane County Planning and (7) sponsor proposed redesign of the preliminary plat/PUD. The review revealed considerable confusion regarding the file organization and content of the file and a need to clarify the record, as indicated in the above findings. 26. The applicant has requested to call the development by the name "RIVERwALK" and will record all subdivisions by variations of this new name. This was administratively approved. 27. May 19, 1995, the applicant submitted a "Revise Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site development Plan (PUD) of RIVERWALK" for the entire project. This submittal have been proposed by the applicant to improve the design of the site plan (ie, eliminate double fronting lots, consolidate open areas, other) and has been circulated for agency review and comments. The proposed Final Plat Phase 1 area of the 1983 (S1/2) Final PUD site plan has not changed. NOTE: To clarify the original application (see 1982 Zone Change Map 1:400 Assessor Map stamped by L.S. Patrick Moore) and the present applicant's intent, Inland Pacific Engineering submitted a May 25, 1995, letter with documents requesting to: (1) eliminate the commercial lot from the "preliminary PUD" and (2) remove that portion of the original 1981 property from the "Preliminary Plat of Record" and the "Preliminary PUD" that was transferred to Washington State Parks Department for the Centennial Trail, Auditor No.9112090116 dated Dec. 9, 1991. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 7 and a Revised Preliminary Plat /PUD . PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 28. The May 19, 1995, "Revise Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site development Plan (PUD) of RIVERWALK" was found to be in substantial conformance to the original approvals described in 3. and 7. above and this revised plan has been administratively approved. Because all but the Phase 1 of the Preliminary Plat, the Final S1/2 PUD and the N1 /2 Preliminary PUD has been revised, a "Final PUD Site Development Plan" will need to be submitted and must be approved for compliance with the "Revised Preliminary PUD" for the area of the proposed Final Plat prior to each Final Plat being recorded. This will allow for flexibility in determining the specific and detailed design of each Final PUD of each final plat at that time, for that market and pursuant the then existing development standards. Each Final PUD site development plan will need to substantially conform with the "preliminary PUD" and specifically conform with the PUD Overlay Zone standards in affect at the time. 29. The May 19, 1995, "Revise Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site development Plan (PUD) of RIVERWALK" shows the applicants present development phases; however, these phase boundaries may need to be modified as the economy, market and other variables change. DECISION BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, a three year extension of time request for PE- 1414 -81 / PUDE -1 -82 / ZE- 92 -81, "RIVERWALK" (previously "Riverway Villa) an approved Preliminary Plat, Preliminary Planned Unit Development and zone reclassification is hereby APPROVED until July I, 1998. The May 19, 1995, "Revise Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site development Plan (PUD) of RIVERWALK" is also hereby APPROVED as the official preliminary plat of record and as the preliminary planned unit development plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL All pervious conditions of approval shall continue to apply, as applicable, except as specifically amended. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING 1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee and all time extension conditions, as amended or updated, shall be binding on the "Applicant." The term "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs; assigns and successors. 2. This time extension is approved for three (3) years until July 1, 1998. The applicant may request another extension of time approximately forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 3. Additional Extensions of Time shall no be granted unless substantial compliance with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance is demonstrated by the applicant; otherwise the preliminary subdivision and the preliminary planned unit development approval will become null and void. 4. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #3. and #4.) The "Revised Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site Development Plan (PUD) of RIVERWALK" stamped "Received May 19, 1995," has been administratively approved and shall be the official preliminary plat of record and shall be the preliminary planned unit development. This May 19, 1995 revised plan includes 9.11 acres for a proposed commercial lot and 107.3 acres for a proposed planned unit development (PUD), being a total of 116.41 acres (see said plan map). The PUD proposes 365 single family lots. At the time of each Final PUD site development plan and Final Plat is submitted for each phase they shall comply with all development standards for the approved zone classifications, including the Planned Unit Development Overlay Zone, all as amended. (see 9. below) Note, at this point in time, no part of the preliminary plat/PUD have been finalized since the original 1982 approval. 5. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #34.) The above May 19, 1995 revised plan shows development phases. These phases may be administratively amended if the various agencies find that each proposed phase will provide proper traffic circulation, provide adequate emergency vehicle access, meet necessary utilities design and/or utility circulation requirements, and provide for the public health and safety. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -8I / Page 8 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE- I -82 / ZE -92 -81 6. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #3.) The "Revised Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site Development Plan (PUD) of RIVERWALK" stamped "Received May 19, 1995," now replaces: (1) the "Preliminary Plat of Record" map dated November 12, 1981, as approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 2, 1982, which consisted of 365 manufactured home lots and 1 commercial parcel and (2) the "Revised Preliminary Plat of Record" map dated March 15, 1983, as approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 14, 1983, which was a redesign of the 50.2 acre South portion (S1/2) with 178 lots, excluding the commercial parcel. This SI /2 also being the Final PUD Site Development Plan approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 14, 1983, is now NULL and VOID and is replaced with the above May 19, 1995, preliminary plat/PUD. Note, since the final plat for Phase 1 was submitted before the decision to approve the May 19, 1995, Revised Plan, Phase 1 may be finalized under the provisions of the April 14, 1983, Final PUD, S1/2. 7. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #3.) A "Final PUD Site Development Plan" must be submitted and approved for at least the area of each proposed final plat prior to recording any Final Plat, other than Phase 1. This includes the S1/2 of RIVERWALK (previously Riverway Villa). Each "Final PUD" must substantially conform to the above May 19, 1995, revised preliminary plat/PUD and comply with the applicable development standards existing at the time of submittal. 8. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #4. and 6.) The approved zone change, ZE- 92 -81, shall be amended pursuant the PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT. The project area approved for the old approved Residential Mobil Home (RMH) Zone with the old PUD Overlay Zone shall be substituted with the present Urban Residential-7 (UR -7) Zone and the present PUD Overlay Zone. The project area approved for old Commercial (C) Zone shall be substituted with the present Community Business (B -2) Zone. The existing UR -3.5 Zone shall be reclassified as each phase of the development is recorded as a Final Plat with the County Auditor. The reclassifications shall be consistent with the proposed zoning approved with the preliminary plat of record, as amended by the PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT. 9. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #7 and #11.) The final plat(s) shall be designed substantially in conformance with the above "Revised Preliminary Plat of Record date stamped May 19, 1995." No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. Each Final Plat shall comply with the current development standards of the Urban Residential-7 (UR -7) Zone and the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay Zone, as each may be amended. The proposed commercial parcel shall comply with the current development standards of the Community Business (B -2) Zone, as amended. The entire site shall also comply with the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) overlay zone. 10. The Planning Director /designee shall review any proposed final plat and fmal Planned Unit Development Plan to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 11. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #5.) Prior to recording a final plat which includes the commercial parcel, Spokane County shall: a. insure that the commercial site is in compliance with the development standards of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended, b. insure that the commercial site is in compliance with the development standards of the Spokane County Road Standards, as amended, and d. insure that commercial uses do not exceed those of "neighborhood" and "local serving" type retail or service(s). 12. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #5.) Prior to issuing any building permits on the commercial parcel, a specific site development plan (all or part) shall be submitted to Spokane County. The specific site development plan will be circulated for comments from appropriate agencies to determine compliance with current regulations and for substantial compliance with the approved May 19, 1995, revised Plan and the conditions of approval. 13. A final plat name /number shall be proposed before the final plat is filed, such name /number to be approved by the Planning Director /designee. 14. Prior to filing of the final plat, the appropriate street address(es) shall be indicated. 15. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 9 and a Revised Preliminary Plat/ PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 16. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be deterntined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained. 17. The final plat shall indicate yard setback are Lengths on cul -de -sac lots which meet or exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat. 18. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 19. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to Spokane County Planning prior to filing the final plat. 20. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 21. Spokane County Planning shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a TITLE NOTICE specifying a future land acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice may be released, in full or in part, only by Spokane County Planning. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as the recording of the Final Plat and shall provide the following, if applicable: a. At least 10 feet along Mission Avenue and 5 feet along Barker Road shall be designated as reserved future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities, in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right -of -way along Mission Avenue and Barker Road. NOTE: The County Engineer has required 10 feet of dedication along Mission Avenue and 15 feet of dedication along Barker Road. b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area. c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities. If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made. d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses. e. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future acquisition area. 22. Spokane County Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a TITLE NOTICE noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This TITLE NOTICE shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as the recording of the Final Plat and shall only be released, in full or in part, by Spokane County Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on [ ], imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. [ ] is available for inspection and copying in Spokane County Planning. 23. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement for those lots located on a temporary cul de sac /stub road Lot(s) , Block(s) are located on a temporary cul -de- sac /stub road. This temporary cul -de- sac /stub road tray be extended to provide access to adjacent property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as development and/or circulation needs dictate. 24. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 10 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 25. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 26. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision; and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot. 27. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state - licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat," including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as- built" water system. 28. The Water Plan and the above conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director /designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 29. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 30. Approval is required by the Planning Director /designee of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 31. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 32. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Planning Director /designee shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. 33. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #29.) The Final PUD site development plan shall indicate all exterior boundary setbacks, as well as setbacks from roadways and individual lot lines. 34. A copy of the homeowners /property owners' association articles of incorporation and/or bylaws and/or covenants and restrictions, together with any other provisions for maintenance of common areas and facilities, shall be submitted for review and approval to Spokane County Planning prior to finalizing. 35. The Owner shall negotiate with the Central Valley School District and the Spokane County Parks Department and submit a recorded copy of the agreement making provisions for public schools and parks prior to finalization and recording of this plat. The agreement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measure(s). The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement to purchase property within said plat pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (58.17.205), that appropriate provisions for school facilities and public parks must be made conditioned on a future agreement between the applicant/sponsor, school district, and County Parks Department. Voluntary agreements between the Owner and School District and Spokane County Parks Department shall conform to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 82.02. 36. The owner /applicant shall coordinate with the local Fire District and the Fire Marshall to insure that adequate access is provided for emergency services, prior to submitting each Final Plat phase. 37. Each final plat dedication shall make reference to the Home Owners Association agreements as a notice to potential lot purchaser of the responsibilities of lot ownership within the subdivision. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 11 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -I -82 / ZE -92 -81 38. The lots or common open space shown on the May 19, 1995, Revised Preliminary Plat that are within the 200 foot Shoreline boundary are required to comply with the Spokane County Shoreline Program regulation. The Final Plat shall show the 200 foot shoreline boundary. Each lot which includes the 200 foot boundary must have a buildable site that meets all required setbacks (both zoning and shorelines) before it is recorded as a Final Plat. Notes (at least 2) shall be placed on the Final Plan drawing near the affected lots and common open space which state: The property with the 200 foot Shoreline boundary has legal limitations' on the use of this land pursuant vegetation and building of structures, including fences. 39. If a Final Plat is recorded with any lot partially within the 200 foot boundary of the Shoreline, a TITLE NOTICE shall be recorded by Spokane County Planning immediately after recording the Final Plat with the County Auditor. The TITLE NOTICE shall include a statement similar to: Any lot's property or common open space property within the 200 foot shoreline boundary have limitations on building structures (including fences) and changing the natural vegetation pursuant the SPOKANE COUNTY SHORELINE PROGRAM regulations. 40. After the commercial parcel is granted B -2 Zoning with the recording of a Final Plat, the applicant/owner should make application for a Binding Side Plan to allow for timely division and sale of portions of the commercial site after a Final Binding Site Plan is recorded. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Prior To Issuance Of A Building Permit Or Use Of The Propertv As Proposed: 1. All previously imposed conditions are still applicable. 2. The County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a PRINCIPLE Arterial and Mission Avenue as a MINOR Arterial. The existing right -of -way widths are not consistent with those specified in the Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan, in addition to the required right -of -way dedication, a strip of property 5 feet in width along Barker Road and 10 feet in width along Mission Avenue shall be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when arterial improvements are made to Barker Road and Mission Avenue. 3. As per the original conditions of approval: "A traffic analysis of each phase will be required of the developer and reviewed by Spokane County prior to plat finalization. This analysis will be coordinated with the State of Washington Department of Transportation. A traffic analysis for each phase will serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Should the analysis determine a need for intersection upgrading, the developer will be assessed a proportionate share for the required improvements. 4. Prior to any plat checking of Riverway Villa for phased finalization of the plat the aforementioned analysis shall be completed. . 5. Intersection and road improvements shall be constructed and phased as follows predicated on an agreement reached on or about August 4, 1994, between North Idaho Engineering and the Spokane County Engineer. Barker Road: Phase I: Construct Barker/Indiana intersection (Barker Road to be a 5 -lane section per the County's Special section for Barker Road). Provide acceleration/deceleration lanes (sized per WSDOT Design manual), as well as inbound and outbound tapers. Phase II: Construct Barker Road north to the Spokane River, and south to Mission Avenue, unless built out sooner as part of Phase VI. Phase VI: Construct Barker Road north to the Spokane River, and south to Mission Avenue, unless built out sooner as part of Phase II. Mission Avenue: Phase I: Construct Mission/Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) intersection.. Construct north side of Mission Avenue (per the County's Special Section for Mission Avenue) from Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) to Barker. Provide inbound taper to Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) intersection. Phase III: Construct Mission/Potomac and Mission/Yukon intersections. Construct north side of Mission Avenue (per the County's Special Section for Mission Avenue) along the Mission Avenue frontage from the easterly plat boundary to Mission/Clark Fork (Harmony Lane). Provide inbound taper to the widened Mission/Yukon intersection from east of the easterly plat boundary. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 12 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 6. Conditions of Approval require that Barker Road and Mission Avenue improvements adjacent to Phase VI are to be completed prior to issuance of a building permit for any projects on that parcel. 7. The aforementioned phasing is a minimum development program. Changes to this construction schedule may be implemented pending completion of the Traffic Impact Analysis for each phase of the development. 8. Engineers Condition #21 of April 2, 1982 Hearing Examiner Committee Findings and Order required that a strip of property 15 feet in width along Barker Road be dedicated from Mission Avenue to the Spokane River. Since a portion of this strip is not controlled by the applicant this requirement for dedication is not applicable. Right -of -way along Barker Road within the original approved plat shall be dedicated at the time of final plat approval or vesting of any commercial rezone. Improvements to Barker Road from the Spokane River bridge on Barker to Mission Ave shall still be required with the existing right -of -way per a phasing plan to be agreed to by the developer and approved by the County Engineer. 9. Regarding the May 19, 1995, redesign Plan the following condition shall apply: (I) Temporary cul -de -sacs shall be constructed at the terminus of Indiana Avenue, Tippi Canoe Lane cannot be used as a public road turn- around and all other streets that provide access to more than one lot shall also provide an acceptable turn- around. (2) Improvements to proposed roadways shall be as outlined in the approved conditions of approval or as amended by the overall traffic analysis currently being completed. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 2. The dedication shall state: The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 365.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. Provided, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution under RCW 36.94. 3. Applicant will make connection to Public Sewer System. Sewer Connection Permit is required. 4. Plans and specifications for the public facilities are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. Spokane County plan submittal requirements apply. 5. The dedication shall state: The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 6. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 7. Applicant shall make connection to public sewer system. Sewer connection permit is required. Plans and specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized." 2. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any attached sheets as noted. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 13 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 3. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by Spokane County Planning to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 4. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 6. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each lot of the plat. 8. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 9. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 10. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County /City of Spokane, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot/tract purchaser refused a building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 11. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. 12. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: The public water system, pursuant to the water plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building and Safety Department, and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot/tract prior to sale of each lot/tract and prior to issuance of a building permit for each tract. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS 1. The applicant shall contact the Division of Buildings at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include: ADDRESSING, FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS; FIRE HYDRANT/FLOW; APPROVED WATER SYSTEMS; BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY; CONSTRUCTION TYPE; OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION; EXITING; EXTERIOR WALL PROTECTION; AND ENERGY CODE REGULATIONS. (Note: The Division of Buildings reserves the right to confirm the actual address at the time of building permit.) WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF ANY FINAL PLAT: 1 . A traffic analysis shall be prepared for the Barker Road interchange and shall contain the following elements: a. Site Map (illustrating the complete circulation system) b. Vicinity Map(s) (illustrating traffic distribution) c. Existing Transportation Conditions 1. Existing average daily traffic 2. Existing AM and PM peak hour level of service 3. Existing AM and PM peak hour turning movements June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -8I / Page 14 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 1. continued d. Projected Transportation Conditions with this Development 1. Projected Average Daily Traffic 2. Projected AM and PM peak hour level of service 3. Projected AM and PM peak hour turning movements e. Recommended mitigating measures 1 , Mitigating measures sufficient to maintain existing Level of Service "D" 2. If the existing Level of Service "D" cannot be maintained a justification should be included NOTE: The ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual (5th Edition) shall be used as a basis to compute trip generation rates of the proposed developments. 2. That the applicant agree to fund and construct the necessary mitigating measures as outlined in the above traffic study. These mitigating measures must be approved by both WSDOT and Spokane County Engineers prior to the issuance of any building permits for this property. 3. Due to the trip generation potential, any further development other than what is proposed will require further review by WSDOT to assure additional trips are safely accommodated. COUNTY PARKS DEPARTMENT 1. To satisfy the requirements of RCW -58 -17 -110 that a subdivision make appropriate provisions for public parks, recreation and playgrounds, the owner, at his/her option, shall either dedicate land within the subdivision or enter into a voluntary agreement with Spokane County to mitigate the direct impacts that the subdivision has on public parks, open spaces and recreational facilities within the unincorporated areas of Spokane County. If the owner opts to enter into a voluntary agreement, the agreement shall be executed prior to the finalization and recording of the plat and recorded in conjunction therewith. the agreement shall be consistent with RCW 82.02.020 an substantially the same as the standardized agreement prepared by the Spokane County Parks, Recreation and Fair Department. Prior to finalization of the plat, the owner shall advise any purchaser of property, as authorized under RCW 58.17.205, of the obligations within the voluntary agreement. Additionally, the owner shall submit a recorded copy of said voluntary agreement to Spokane County Planning prior to finalization. DATED THIS I ( DAY OFNI ti r ). , 14 John N , Senior Planner Under State Law and County Ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with the appropriate appeal fee, payable to the Spokane County Treasurer, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1.82 / ZE -92 -81 If you have any questions, please call the Spokane County Planning at 456 -2205. pc: County Division of Engineering and Roads Washington State Department of Transportation County Division of Utilities County Health District County Division of Buildings County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair Central Valley School District Fire District 1 Welco Group Inc, 1220 116th Ave, NE, Bellevue Wa North Idaho Engineering, W 4200 Seltice Way, Coeur Consolidated Irrigation District Richard Mason, IPEC, 707 W. 7th, Ste 200, Spokane 98004 D'Alene, ID, 83814 Wa 99204 Page 15 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON June 9, 1995 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Current Planning_ Administrator,) FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER j V 7 . SUBJ: PE 1414, Riverwalk PUD Redesign re: Subdivisions The Spokane County Engineer has reviewed the proposed design and would make the following comments to the proposed PUD. Temporary cul -de -sacs shall be constructed at the terminus of Indiana Avenue, Tippi Canoe Lane cannot be used as a public road turn - around and all other streets that provide access to more than 1 lot shall also provide an acceptable turn - around. Improvements to proposed roadways shall be as outlined in the approved conditions of approval or as ammended by the overall traffic analysis currently being completed. Thank you. sam Enclosure c PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLIS D. HUBBARD, DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: Division of Engineering and Roads Division of Utilities Division of Buildings Spokane County Health District Spokane County Parks, Recreation and Fair Fire Protection District No. 1 Consolidated Irrigation District Central Valley School District Louis Webster, Planner I L� RECEIVED MAY 2 41995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER FROM: DATE: May 24, 1995 SUBJECT: Proposed Revised Preliminary Plat of PE- 1414 -81 RIVERWALK (Formerly Riverway Villa) Enclosed find copies of the above referenced revised preliminary plat. The sponsor has made revisions along the 200 foot shoreline zone. Please review the revised preliminary plat and forward any comments by June 7,1995. If you have any questions you may contact Louis Webster at 456 -2205. c: North Idaho Engineering, 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2, Coeur D'Alene, ID 83814 Inland Pacific Engineering, 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200, Spokane, WA 99204 Welco Group, 1220 116th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0240 • (509) 456-2205 • FAX: (509) 456 -2243 • TDD: (509) 324 -3166 jit BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN THE MATTER OF' AMENDING AN EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST FOR PE- 1414 -81, ZE- 92 -81, PUDE -1 -82 RIVERWAY VILLA, A PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION THIS MATTER, AMENDING the Extension of Time, for PE- 1414 -81, Riverway Villa, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter III, Section G) and RCW 58.17.140. The changed or amended findings and conditions are shown below in bold italics type. 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning. 2. The subject preliminary plat and Planned Unit Development concept plan was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on April 2, 1982. The development consisted of a manufactured home subdivision on 118 acres for 365 lots including open space and one commercial lot. The proposed plat was accompanied by a rezone from Agricultural (A) to Residential Manufactured Home (RMI -I) with a Planned Unit Development Overlay zone and one Commercial (C) tract under the now expired, Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The sponsor submitted a final development plan with a Change of Conditions for the southem portion of the site which was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on April 14, 1983. The approved final development plan for the southern portion of the site consisted of a maximum of 178 lots on approximately 50 acres. The Hearing Examiner Committee required a final development plan for the northern portion of the site within three years of the approval for the Change of Conditions, by May 1, 1986, or the preliminary status of the northern portion of the site would become null and void. The Planning Department denied the fifth, and most recent, request for an extension of time . and the applicant/owner filed an appeal. In the interim, before the public hearing on the appeal, the applicant/owner provided additional information concerning final plat submittal. The applicant/owner did submit copies of the final plat for review but did not pay the appropriate fee. Based on the final plat submittal, the Spokane County Planning Department has reconsidered the decision, dated March 4, 1993, to deny the extension of time request. The Planning Department approved a time extension with conditions and eliminated preliminary approval for the northern portions of the preliminary plat of record based on conditions attached to the Hearing Examiner Committee Findings and Decision dated April 2, 1983 , requiring a final development plan for the northern portions of the site be submitted for review by the Committee by May 1, 1986. The ownerlapplicant filed an appeal to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee of the Planning Department's reconsidered Findings and Decision dated May 24, 1993. The owner /applicant also submitted a written analysis showing that the numerous time extension applications were for the entire project and each extension was granted for the entire preliminary plat of record. However, a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) Plan for the northern portion of the site has never been submitted for review and approval consistent with the adopted Planned Unit Development standards. Any additional extensions of time should be conditioned for a final development plan on the northern portions of the preliminary plat of record. 3. The proposal is generally located south of the Spokane River, east of Barker. Road, and north of Mission Avenue in Section'8, Township 25 North, Range 45 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. Revised Extension of Time Findings RESPONSE: Does not apply. PE- 1414 -81 Page 2 4. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5), previously established as Agricultural (A) zoning in 1957 (ZE- 286 -57) and redesignated to Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) on January 1, 1991 consistent with the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. The proposal also included a zone reclassification under, the now expired, Spokane County Zoning Ordinance which would correspond to the Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) and Community Business (B -2) zone(s) under the current Spokane County Zoning Code. The proposed development, including the northern portion of the preliminary plat of record, has not been reviewed for consistency with the . density standards of the Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) zone or with other development standards since the county-wide zoning redesignation on January 1, 1991. Any development of the proposed plat and Planned Unit Development should conform to current Zoning, Planned Unit Development, and Subdivision standards. The applicant/owner should provide a revised final Planned Unit Development plan which shows conformance to the Urban Residential -7 (UR -7), Manufactured Home, and Planned Unit Development (PUD) standards of the Spokane County Zoning Code for review by the appropriate agencies. The overall development plan shall be submitted and approved prior to any final plat approval. 5. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. 6. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and department policy for short subdivisions. These criteria are found in Chapter III, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this decision. Section G states, "Approval of a preliminary subdivision shall automatically expire three years after preliminary approval is granted unless a time extension is applied for." and follows with "Upon application for time extension , the Planning Director or designee may administratively approve extensions for up to three (3) year periods provided at least one of the following circumstances is found to apply:" The following are the relevant sections of Section G and the Planning Department response: 1. That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the last extension was granted and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval. RESPONSE: The owner has been granted five (5) extensions of time since the. original approval by the Hearing Examiner Committee on April 2, 1982. No portion of the site has been finalized and recorded as a final plat. 2. That the preliminary plat as approved remains consistent with the Generalized Comprehensive Plan for Spokane County insofar as density and other development provisions apply, and the sponsor has taken substantial steps towards finalizing his plat, which shall include but not be limited to: a. surveying the lots within the development, b. arranging for public services to the site, c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary plat, d. the completion of studies or other requirements which were part of preliminary plat approval; RESPONSE: In the decision to deny the fifth request for an extension of time the Spokane County Planning Department found no significant plat activity since the last time extension was granted on January 13, 1992. However, following the submittal of the appeal the applicant/owner has shown that some recent effort was made but nonpayment of the final plat review fee delayed final plat review by the Spokane County Planning Department. 3. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This provision shall not apply to public utility extension which the project sponsor would . normally fund. Revised Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page 3 The Spokane County Planning Department does find that the statutory limits for preliminary plat approval have been exceeded and, though local regulation has considerably more flexibility for consideration for time extensions, any future time extensions should be denied if significant steps are not taken by the applicant/owner to finalize some portion of the preliminary plat of record prior to expiration of this time extension. 7. Updated conditions have been submitted by the various reviewing agencies and departments, including the County Engineer's Office, County Health District, County Utilities, Washington State Department of Transportation and the Department of Building and Safety and are attached as part of this decision. 8. The Central Valley School District No. 356 has commented on the proposed time extension for Riverway Villa. The District has indicated that existing school facilities are inadequate to serve the proposed plat and wishes to negotiate with the owner to provide adequate capital facilities as required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 58.17.110. Review by County legal counsel indicates the condition requested by the School District can be required for developments. Approval of this time extension should include conditions requiring that provisions for appropriate facilities be in place prior to recording the final plat in the form of a written agreement between the owner and the school district. 9. The Spokane County Parks Department has commented on the proposed time extension for Riverway Villa. The Parks Department has requested a voluntary agreement be completed between the Parks Department and the property owner to mitigate impacts to the County Park system. County legal counsel has indicated such agreements can be required. The Parks Department recommends the Property owner negotiate with the Spokane County Parks Department to provide for appropriate capital facilities as required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 58.17.110. Approval of this plat should include conditions requiring that provisions for appropriate facilities be in place prior to recording this final plat in the form of a written agreement between the owner and the Spokane County Parks Department. 10. This is the fifth request for a time extension. The total life of the preliminary plat has been approximately eleven (11) years: April 1982 to April 1983 • April 1983 to April 1986 November 1986 to December 1988 December 1988 to January 1990 January 1990 to January 1992 January 1992 to January 1993 Preliminary approval and change of conditions Three years granted with change of conditions 2 years 2 years 2 years 1 year 11. The following facts are also relevant. a. A part of the northern portion of the approved preliminary plat of record fell under the jurisdiction of the Washington State Shoreline Management Act, RCW 90.58, and the Spokane County Shoreline Program, WAC 173 -19 -400. Creation of the Washington State Centennial Trail along the Spokane River may have removed portions of the site from Shorelines jurisdiction. Review of a final Planned Unit Development for the northern portions of the preliminary plat would determine any portions of the site still within the Shorelines area. b. The extension of time request was incomplete insofar as the entire site was not included for consideration. The applicant requested an extension of time for the southern one half of the site. The Planning Department notified the applicant of the error and an addendum to the application was submitted on February 26, 1993. c. The site is located within an area of Spokane County which was recently reevaluated by the Washington State Health Board on June 9, 1993, for removal of an exemption from sewerage standards (WAC 246- 272 -100). The site is located within the previous exemption boundary which is also designated as the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA). The site would not be located within the new exemption boundary which lakes effect on January 1, 1994. Any future time extension requests may be affected by the new exemption. boundary. 12. Recognizing the recommended conditions and Spokane County development standards, the proposed subdivision makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety and Revised Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page 4 general welfare and that the public use and interest will be served by platting the proposed subdivision. The subdivision proposal is generally consistent with RCW 58.17 and the County subdivision regulations, promoting the public health, safety and general welfare in accordance with standards established by the state and Spokane County. The Planning Department has considered the provision of public facilities as cited in RCW 58.17.110 (2). More specifically: • a. open spaces b. drainage ways c. public and/or private rights -of -way d. transit e. potable water f. sanitary waste disposal g. parks and recreation facilities h. playgrounds i. schools and schoolgrounds j. sidewalks 13. The site is located within the Public Transit Benefit Area (PTBA). Route #18, Broadway Feeder, provides connecting service to the Valley park and ride lot located on University Avenue. 14. The Spokane County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a Principle Arterial and Mission Avenue as a Minor Arterial. The existing roadway width is inconsistent with that specified in the Arterial Road Plan. In order to implement the Plan the County Engineer has requested a 5 foot reserve strip along Barker Road and a 10 foot reserve strip along Mission Avenue to be designated as a Future Acquisition Area. Preliminary plat approval also required dedication of an additional 10 feet of right -of -way on Mission Avenue and 15 feet on Barker Road. Sidewalks are required along the arterial roads fronting and within the plat. The Washington State Department of Transportation has recommended conditions to mitigate impacts to the Barker Road interchange. Those recommendations have been incorporated into this decision. 15. The proposed plat will be served by a public water system. Waste water disposal will be as authorized by the Director of Utilities. 16. The applicant/owner has shown a recent attempt to comply with Chapter III, Section G, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance therefore, additional time extension of one year is justified to allow completion of Riverway Villa First Addition. DECISION BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the AMENDED DECISION FOR AN extension of time for application PE- 1414 -81, Riverway Villa is hereby APPROVED as conditioned below, until September 1, 1994. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (UPDATED) 1. Additional Extensions of Time shall not he granted unless substantial compliance with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance is demonstrated by the applicant; otherwise the preliminary subdivision approval will become null and void. 2. . All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee, as updated by this decision, shall be binding on the "Applicant ", which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. 3. The conditions of approval shall apply to the preliminary subdivision of record as approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Revised Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page 5 Conclusions, and Decision Dated April 14, 1983 consisting of 365 residential and one commercial lot(s). Preliminary approval for the remaining (north) portion of the site will be extended for one year, or until September 1, 1994, to allow the applicantlowner to submit a final Planned Unit Development Plan for the north one half of the site. The final PUD shall comply with current zoning, PUD, and manufactured home standards. The final plat and final PUD documents shall be submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department along with the appropriate fees 4. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) with Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay zone(s) as amended. The proposed commercial lot shall comply with the Community Business (B -2) zone as amended. The entire site shall comply with the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) overlay zone. A revised Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) site plan for the south one half shall be submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for administrative review and approval prior to any final plat, submittal and review. The revised Final PUD shall comply with current zoning, PUD, and manufactured home standards. 5. The owner /applicant shall provide a detailed site development plan for the commercial tract. The.site development plan shall be administratively reviewed by the Spokane County Planning Department. The proposed commercial zoning shall be implemented upon finalization of the lot(s) as part of a recorded final plat. In addition, development of the commercial lot shall comply with the following: a. Prior to issuing any building pemtits on the commercial lot, a specific site development plan (all or part) shall be approved by the County Planning Director /designee who will circulate and request comments from appropriate agencies. b. The Spokane County Planning Director shall insure compliance with the Spokane County Zoning Code and that proper measures are made for compatibility between existing or future adjacent land uses and with those permitted uses on the commercial lot. The Planning Director shall also insure that commercial uses do not exceed those of neighborhood and local serving retail or services, and consider accommodation of "Park and Ride" space for public transit and/or transit shelters. Consideration will be given to: building size, height, setbacks, paving, parking, drainage, landscaping, signage, Lighting, buffering of delivery traffic from residential uses with sight and sound obscuring fencing (ie. five foot masonry wall), ingress /egress, and loading areas. c. The Spokane County Planning Director has the authority to present the commercial site development plan to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee at a public hearing if proposed development is inconsistent with this decision. 6. Upon filing the final plat, or a portion thereof, the zone reclassification of the final plat area shall be finalized, and the existing zone classification shall be changed to UR -7 for the residential portions of the preliminary plat and B -2 for the commercial lot, consistent with the proposed zoning approved with the preliminary plat of record. 7. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee on April 14, 1983. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. 8. The Planning Director /designee shall review any proposed final plat and final Planned Unit Development Plan to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 9. A final plat name /number shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name /number to be approved by the Planning Director /designee. 10. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. 11. The applicant shall develop subject property in strict conformance with the site plan presented to the Hearing Body on April 14, 1983. All aspects of the concept and proposal shall be binding on the development, including proposed use. Variations, to be approved by the Planning Director /designee shall only be allowed to meet regulation standards and conditions of approval. Any other modification must be presented to the Hearing Body for review and approval. Revised Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page 6 12. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 13. The preliminary plat is given an extension of time for one year from the date of this decision, specifically to September 1, 1994. 14. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 15. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 16. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 17. The Spokane County Planning Department shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following: a. At least 10 feet along Mission Avenue and 5 feet along Barker Road shall be designated as reserved future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities, in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right -of -way along Mission Avenue and Barker Road. NOTE: The County Engineer has required 10 feet of dedication along Mission Avenue and 15 feet of dedication along Barker Road. b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area. c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities. If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway . improvements are made. d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone,•except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses. e. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future acquisition area. 18. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement for those lots located on a temporary cul de sac /stub road: "Lot(s) , Block(s) are Located on a temporary cul -de- sac /stub road. This temporary cul -de- sac /stub road may be extended to provide access to adjacent property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as development and/or circulation needs dictate." 19. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul -de -sac lots which meet or exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat. 20. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a. transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. 21. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion Revised Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page 7 of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 22. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision or binding site plan, and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 23. No building permit will be issued fdr any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state - licensed engineer that the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat, ".including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as- built" water system. 24. The Water Plan and the above conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be • waived by the Planning Director /designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 25. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 26. Approval is required by the Planning Director /designee of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 27. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 28. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Planning Director /designee shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. 29. The PUD binding site plan shall indicate all exterior boundary setbacks, as well as setbacks from roadways and individual lot lines. 30. A copy of the homeowners /property owners' association articles of incorporation and /or bylaws and/or covenants and restrictions, together with any other provisions for maintenance of common areas and facilities, shall be submitted for review and approval to the Planning Department prior to finalizing. 31. The Owner shall negotiate with the Central Valley School District and the Spokane County Parks Department and submit a recorded copy of the agreement making provisions for public schools and parks prior to finalization and recording of this plat. The agreement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measure(s). The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement to purchase property within said plat pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (58.17.205), that appropriate provisions for school facilities and public parks must be made conditioned on a future agreement between the plattor, school district, and County Parks Department. Voluntary agreements between the Owner and School District and Spokane County Parks Department shall conform to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 82.02. 32. The Planning Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: Revised Extension of Time Findings 2. The dedication shall state: PE- 1414 -81 Page 8 The parcel of property legally described as is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on , imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department. 33. The owner /applicant shall coordinate with the local Fire District and the Fire Marshall to insur that adequate access is provided for emergency services. 34. Phasing shall be approved by all reviewing departments. Phasing may be modified by the Planning Department upon recommendations from county or state agencies /departments that proposed phasing creates impacts which can be reduced or eliminated by altering size of schedule. Mitigating impacts of traffic and schools shall be considered for approval of each phase of development. 35. Each final plat dedication shall make reference to the Home Owners Association agreements a a notice to potential lot purchaser of the responsibilities of lot ownership within the subdivision. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS (UPDATED) Prior To Issuance Of A Building Permit Or Use Of The Proverty As Proposed: 1. All previously imposed conditions are still applicable. • 2. The County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a Principle Arterial and Mission Avenue as a Minor Arterial. The existing right -of -way widths are not consistent with those specified in the Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan, in addition to the required right -of -way dedication, a strip of property 5 feet in width along Barker Road and 10 feet in width along Mission Avenue shall be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when arterial improvements are made to Barker Road and Mission Avenue. 3. As per the original conditions of approval: " A traffic analysis of each phase will be required of the developer and reviewed by Spokane' County prior to plat finalization. This analysis will be coordinated with the State of Washington Department of Transportation. A traffic analysis for each phase will serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Should the analysis determine a need for intersection upgrading, the developer will I assessed a proportionate share for the required improvements. 4. Prior to any plat checking of Riverway Villa for phased finalization of the plat the aforementioned analysis shall be completed. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES (UPDATED) 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on- site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94." 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. • • Revised Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page 9 4. The dedication shall state Each new dwelling unit shall be double_plumbyd'fot'J P connection to future areawide collection systems wb� 5t 5. A dry sewer connection to the future areawide sewerage system shall be constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer connection shall be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. 6. Applicant shall make connection to public sewer system. Sewer connection permit is required. Plans and specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. The 37 lots proposed for Riverway Villa First Addition is authorized for the use of on site disposal systems and shall provide double plumbing and a dry sewer. Any future phases of Riverway Villa shall connect to an interim public system or connect to a permanent public sewer facility. Rivenvay Villa First Addition shall connect to the interim facility or public sewer when available. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT (UPDATED) 1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any attached sheets as noted. 2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements' by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each tract of the plat. 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan moist have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with • their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County/City of Spokane, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot/tract purchaser refused a building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. .10. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health officer, the use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems may be authorized for 37 units of blocks 1 -6 ( Riverway Villa First Addition). ' 11. A public sewer system will be made available for the remainder of the plat, and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. • . Revised Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page 10 12. The dedicatory language of the plat will state: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of on -site sewage disposal systems may be authorized for 37 units of blocks 1 -6 (Riverway Villa First Addition)." 13. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will be made available for the remainder of the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale." 14. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is • prohibited." 15. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant to the water plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building and Safety Department, and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot/tract prior to sale of each lot/tract and prior to issuance of a building permit for each tract." SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS (UPDATED) 1. The applicant shall contact the Department of Buildings at the earliest possible stage of design/development in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concems include: FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS; FIRE HYDRANT/FLOW; APPROVED WATER SYSTEMS; BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY; CONSTRUCIION TYPE; OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION; EXITING; EXTERIOR WALL PROTECTION; AND ENERGY CODE REGULATIONS. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF ANY FINAL PLAT: 1. A traffic analysis shall be prepared for the Barker Road interchange and shall contain the following elements: a. Site Map (illustrating the complete circulation system) b. Vicinity Map(s) (illustrating traffic distribution) c Existing Transportation Conditions 1. Existing average daily traffic 2. Existing AM and PM peak hour level of service 3. Existing AM and PM peak hour turning movements d. Projected Transportation Conditions with this Development 1. Projected Average Daily Traffic 2. Projected AM and PM peak hour level of service 3. Projected AM and PM peak hour turning movements e. Recommended mitigating measures 1 Mitigating measures sufficient to maintain existing Level of Service "D" 2. If the existing Level of Service "D" cannot be maintained a justification should be included NOTE: The 11"E (Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual (5th Edition) shall be used as a basis to compute trip generation rates of the proposed developments. 2. That the applicant agree to fund and construct the necessary mitigating measures as outlined in the above traffic study. These mitigating measures must be approved by both WSDOT and Spokane County Engineers prior to the issuance of any building permits for this property. 3. Due to the trip generation potential, any further development other than what is proposed will require further review by WSDOT to assure additional trips are safely accommodated. Revised Extension of Time Findings DATED THIS DAY OF AUGUST, 1993. For: Thomas Veljic, Planner I PE- 1414 -81 Page 11 Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with the appropriate processing fee payable to the Spokane County Planning Department, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456 -2205. c: County Engineer County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety County Parks Department of Transportation Central Valley School District Trinity Enterprises, 2128 North Pines, Suite 17 -9, Spokane, WA 99206 John Clardy, P 0 Box 762, Deer Park, WA 99006 North Idaho Engineering, 4200 West Seltice Way, Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 IN THE MATTER OF A RECONSIDERATION ) OF AN EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST FOR ) PE- 1414 -81, ZE- 92 -81, PUDE -1 -82 ) FINDINGS OF FACT RIVERWAY VILLA, A PRELIMINARY PLAT ) CONCLUSIONS AND WITH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ) DECISION OVERLAY ZONE ) THIS MATTER, a request for a reconsideration of a DENIED extension of time from North Idaho Engineering has been received and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter III, Section G) and RCW 58.17.140. cz 915 BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1 . The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning. 2., The subject preliminary plat and Planned Unit Development concept plan was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on April 2, 1982. The development consisted of a manufactured home subdivision on 118 acres for 365 lots including open space and one commercial lot. The proposed plat was accompanied by a rezone from Agricultural (A) to Residential Manufactured Home (RMH) with Planned Unit Development and one Commercial (C) tract under the, now expired, Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The sponsor submitted a final development plan with change of conditions for the southern portion of the site which was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on April 14, 1983. The approved final development plan for the southern portion of the site consisted of a maximum of 178 lots on approximately 50 acres. The Hearing Examiner Committee required a final development plan within three years of the approval for the change of conditions, by May 1, 1986, or the preliminary status of the northern portion of the site would become null and void. Since a final development plan was not submitted for the remaining (northern) portions of the site the Spokane County Planning Department concludes that only the southern portion of the site shall have preliminary plat status with the remainder (northern portion) as null and void. The Planning Department denied the fifth request for an extension of time and the applicant/owner filed an appeal. In the interim, before the public hearing on the appeal, the applicant /owner provided additional information concerning final plat submittal. The applicant/owner did submit copies of the final plat for review but did not pay the appropriate fee. Based on the final plat submittal the Spokane County Planning Department has reconsidered the decision, dated March 4, 1993, to deny the extension of time request. 3. The proposal is generally located south of the Spokane River, east of Barker Road, and north of Mission Avenue in Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 45 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. 4. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5), previously established as Agricultural (A) zoning in 1957 (ZE- 286 -57) and redesignated to Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) on January 1, 1991 consistent with the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. The proposal also requested a zone reclassification under, the now expired, Spokane County Zoning Ordinance which would correspond to the Urban Residential -7 ((JR -7) and Community Business (B -2) zones under the current Spokane County Zoning Code. The proposed development is consistent with Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) density standards however, it has not been reviewed for consistency with all current development standards since the county -wide zoning redesignation on January 1, 1991. Any development of the proposed plat and Planned Unit Development should conform to current Zoning and Subdivision standards "The applicant/owner should provide a revised final Planned Unit Development plan RECEIVED shows conformance to the Urban Residential -7 (UR -7), Manufactured Horne, and 24 1993 County Engineering Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page 2 Planned Unit Development (PUD) standards of the Spokane County Zoning Code for review by the appropriate agencies. The overall development plan shall be submitted and approved prior to any final plat approval. 5. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. 6. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and department policy for short subdivisions. These criteria are found in Chapter HI, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this decision. Section G states, "Approval of a preliminary subdivision shall automatically expire three years after preliminary approval is granted unless a time extension is applied for." and • follows'with "Upon application for time extension , the Planning Director or designee may administratively approve extensions for up to three (3) year periods provided at least one of the following circumstances is foundto apply:" The following are the relevant sections of Section G and the Planning Department response: 1. That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the last extension was granted and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval. RESPONSE: The owner has been granted five (5) extensions of time since the original approval by the Hearing Examiner Committee on April 2, 1982. No portion of the site has been finalized and recorded as a final plat. 2. That the preliminary plat as approved remains consistent with the Generalized Comprehensive Plan for Spokane County insofar as density AND other development provisions apply, and the sponsor has taken substantial steps towards finalizing his plat, which shall include but not be limited to: a. surveying the Lots within the development, b. arranging for public services to the site, c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary plat, d. the completion of studies or other requirements which were part of preliminary plat approval; RESPONSE: In the decision to deny the fifth request for an extension of time the Spokane County Planning Department found no significant plat activity since the last time extension was granted on January 13, 1992. However, following the submittal of the appeal the applicant/owner has shown that some recent effort was made but nonpayment of the final plat review fee delayed final plht review by the Spokane County Planning Department. 3. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This provision shall not apply to public utility extension which the project sponsor would normally fund. RESPONSE: Does not apply. The Spokane County Planning Department does find that the statutory limits for preliminary plat approval have been exceeded and, though local regulation has considerably more flexibility for consideration for time extensions, any future time extensions should be denied if significant steps are not taken by the applicant/owner to finalize some portion of the preliminary plat of record prior to expiration of this time extension. 7. Updated conditions have been submitted by the various reviewing agencies and departments, including the County Engineer's Office, County Health District; County Utilities, Washington State Department of Transportation and the Department of Building and Safety. 8. The Central Valley School District No. 356 has commented on the proposed time extension for Riverway Villa. The District has indicated that existing school facilities are inadequate to serve the proposed plat and wishes to negotiate with the owner to provide adequate capital facilities as required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page 3 58.17.110. Review by County legal counsel indicates the condition requested by the School District can be required for developments. Approval of this time extension should include conditions requiring that provisions for appropriate facilities be in place prior to recording the final plat in the form of a written agreement between the owner and the school district. 9. The Spokane County Parks Department has commented on the proposed time extension for Riverway Villa. The Parks Department has requested a voluntary agreement be completed between the Parks Department and the property owner to mitigate impacts to the County Park system. County legal counsel has indicated such agreements can be required. The Parks Department recommends the Property owner negotiate with the Spokane County Parks Department to provide for appropriate capital facilities as required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 58.17.110. Approval of this plat should include conditions requiring that provisions for appropriate facilities be in place prior to recording this final plat in the fomt of a written agreement between the owner and the Spokane County Parks Department. 10. This is the fifth request for a time extension. The total life of the preliminary plat has been approximately eleven (11) years: April 1982 to April 1983 April 1983 to April 1986 November 1986 to December 1988 December 1988 to January 1990 January 1990 to January 1992 January 1992 to January 1993 Preliminary approval and change of conditions Three years granted with change of conditions 2 years 2 years 2 years 1 year 11. The following facts are also relevant. a. The northern portion of the site falls under the jurisdiction of the Washitigton State Shoreline Management Act, RCW 90.58, and the Spokane County Shoreline Program, WAC 173 -19 -400. However, the Spokane County Planning Department • has determined that those portions of the original preliminary plat located along the Spokane River are no longer part of the approved preliminary plat of record for noncompliance with conditions set forth in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision issued by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee on April 14, 1983. b. The extension of time request was incomplete insofar as the entire site was not included for consideration. The applicant requested an extension of time for the southern one half of the site. The Planning Department notified the applicant of the error and an addendum to the application was submitted on February 26, 1993. Further review of the historical file found that the southern portion of the site is the recognized preliminary plat of record and the remaining portions are no longer part of the preliminary plat of record. • 12. Recognizing the recommended conditions and Spokane County development standards, the proposed subdivision makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety and general welfare and that the public use and interest will be served by platting the proposed subdivision. The subdivision proposal is generally consistent with RCW 58.17 and the County subdivision regulations, promoting the public health, safety and general welfare in accordance with standards established by the state and Spokane County. The Planning Department has considered the provision of public facilities as cited in RCW 58.17.110 (2). More specifically: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. J. open spaces drainage ways public and/or private rights -of -way transit potable water sanitary waste disposal parks and recreation facilities playgrounds schools and schoolgrounds sidewalks Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page 4 13. The site is located within the Public Transit Benefit Area (PTBA). Route #18, Broadway Feeder, provides connecting service to the Valley park and ride lot located on University Avenue. 14_ The Spokane County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a Principle Arterial and Mission Avenue as a Minor Arterial. The existing roadway width is inconsistent with that specified in the Arterial Road Plan. In order to implement the Plan the County Engineer has requested a 5 foot reserve strip along Barker Road and a 10 foot reserve strip along Mission Avenue to be designated as a Future Acquisition Area. Preliminary plat approval also required dedication of an additional 10 feet of right -of -way on Mission Avenue and 15 feet on Barker Road. Sidewalks are required along the arterial roads fronting and within the plat. The Washington State Department of Transportation has recommended conditions to mitigate impacts to the Barker Road interchange. Those recommendations have been incorporated into this decision. 15. The proposed plat will be served by a public water system. Waste water disposal will be as authorized by the Director of Utilities. . 16. The applicant/owner has shown a recent attempt to comply with Chapter III, Section 0, • of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance therefore, additional time extension of one year is justified to allow completion of Riverway Villa First Addition. DECISION BASED 'UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the request for reconsideration for a previously denied extension of time request for application PE- 1414 -81 Riverway Villa is hereby APPROVED as conditioned below, until June 1, 1994. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (UPDATED) 1 Additional Extensions of Time Shall not be ranted unless substantial compliance with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance is demonstrated by the applicant; otherwise the preliminary subdivision approval will become null and void. 2. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee, as updated by this decision, shall be binding on the "Applicant ", which term shall include the owner or owners of the . property, heirs, assigns and successors. 3. The conditions of approval shall apply to the preliminary subdivision of record as approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 14, 1983 consisting of 178 Lots. Preliminary approval for the remaining (north) portion of the site is null and void. 4. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) with Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay zone(s) as amended. The proposed commercial lot shall comply with the Community Business (B -2) zone as amended. The entire site shall comply with the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) overlay zone. A Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) site plan shall be submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for administrative review and approval. The Final PUD shall comply with current zoning, PUD, and manufactured home standards. 5. The owner /applicant shall provide a detailed site development plan for the commercial tract. The site development plan shall be administratively reviewed by the Spokane County Planning Department. The proposed commercial zoning shall be implemented upon finalization of the lot(s) as part of a recorded final plat. In addition, development of the commercial lot shall comply with the following: Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page 5 a. Prior to issuing any building permits on the commercial lot, a specific site development plan (all or part) shall be approved by the County Planning Director /designee who will circulate and request comments from appropriate agencies. b. The Spokane County Planning Director shall insure compliance with the Spokane County Zoning Code and that proper measures are made for compatibility between existing or future adjacent land uses and with those permitted uses on the • commercial lot. The Planning Director shall also insure that commercial uses do not exceed those of neighborhood and local serving retail or services, and consider accortunodation of "Park and Ride" space for public transit and/or transit shelters. Consideration will be given to: building size, height, setbacks, paving, parking, drainage, landscaping, signage, lighting, buffering of delivery traffic from residential uses with sight and sound obscuring fencing (ie. five foot masonry wall), ingress /egress, and loading areas. c. The Spokane County Planning Director has the authority to present the commercial site development plan to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee at a public hearing if proposed development is inconsistent with this decision. 6. Upon filing the final plat, or a portion thereof, the zone reclassification of the final plat area shall be finalized, and the existing zone classification shall be changed to UR -7 for the residential portions of the preliminary plat and B -2 for the commercial lot, consistent with the proposed zoning approved with the preliminary plat of record. 7. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee on April 14, 1983. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. 8. The Planning Director /designee shall review any proposed final plat and final Planned Unit Development Plan to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 9. A final plat name /number shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name/number to be approved by the Planning Director /designee. 10: Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. • 11. The applicant shall develop subject property in strict conformance with the site plan presented to the hearing Body on April 14, 1983. All aspects of the concept and proposal shall be binding on the development, including proposed use. Variations, to be approved by the Planning Director /designee, shall only be allowed to meet regulation standards and conditions of approval. Any other modification must be presented to the Hearing Body for review and approval. 12. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks' indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 1 3. The preliminary plat is given an extension of time for one year from the date of this decision , specifically to June 1, 1994. 14. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 15. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 16. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 17. The Spokane County Planning Department shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a Tide Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 e. Page 6 part, by the Planning Department. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following: a. At least 10 feet along Mission Avenue and 5 feet along Barker Road shall be designated as reserved future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities, in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right -of -way along Mission Avenue and Barker Road. NOTE: The County Engineer has required 10 feet of dedication along Mission Avenue and 15 feet of dedication along Barker Road. b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area. c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities. If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made. d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future acquisition area. 18. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement for those lots located on a temporary cul de sac /stub road: "Lot(s) , Block(s) are located on a temporary cul -de- sac /stub road. This temporary cul -de- sac /stub road may be extended to provide access to adjacent property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as development and/or circulation needs dictate." 19. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul -de -sac lots which meet or exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat. 20. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. 21. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 22. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and . water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision or binding site plan, and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 23. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state - licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat," including a signed license stamp. The certification maybe in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as- built" water system. 24. The Water Plan and the above conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director /designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page 7 approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 25. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 26. Approval is required by the Planning Director /designee of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 27. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 28. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Planning Director /designee shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. 29. The PUD binding site plan shall indicate all exterior boundary setbacks, as well as setbacks from roadways and individual lot lines. 30. A copy of the homeowners /property owners' association articles of incorporation and/or bylaws and/or covenants and restrictions, together with any other provisions for maintenance of common areas and facilities, shall be submitted for review and approval to the Planning Department prior to finalizing. 31. The Owner shall negotiate with the Central Valley School District and the Spokane County Parks Department and submit a recorded copy of the agreement making provisions for public schools and parks prior to finalization and recording of this plat. The agreement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measure(s). • The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement to purchase property within said plat pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (58.17.205), that appropriate provisions for school facilities 'and public parks must be made conditioned on a future agreement between the plattor, school district, and County Parks Department. Voluntary agreements between the Owner and School District and Spokanc County Parks Department shall conform to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 82.02. 32. The Planning Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: The parcel of property legally described as is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on , imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. .. is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department. 33. The owner /applicant shall coordinate with the local Fire District and the Fire Marshall to insure that adequate access is provided for emergency services. 34. Phasing shall be approved by all reviewing departments. Phasing may be modified by the Planning Department upon recommendations from county or state agencies /departments that Proposed phasing creates impacts which can he reduced or eliminated by altering size of schedule. Mitigating impacts of traffic and schools shall be considered for approval of each phase of development. • 35. Each final plat dedication shall make reference to the Home Owners Association agreements as a notice to potential lot purchaser of the responsibilities of lot ownership within the subdivision. Extension of Time Findings SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS (UPDATED) Prior To Issuance Of A B in uild P Or Use Of The Proper As Proposed 1. All previously imposed conditions are still applicable. 2. The County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a Principle Arterial and Mission Avenue as a Minor Arterial. The existing right -of -way widths are not consistent with those specified in the Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan, in addition to the required right -of -way dedication, a strip of property 5 feet in width along Barker Road and 10 feet in width along Mission Avenue shall be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when arterial improvements are made to Barker Road and Mission Avenue. 3. As per the original conditions of approval: " A traffic analysis of each phase will be required of the developer and reviewed by Spokane County prior to plat finalization. This analysis will be coordinated with the State of Washington Department of Transportation. A traffic analysis for each phase will serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Should the analysis determine a need for intersection upgrading, the developer will be assessed a proportionate share for the required improvements. 4. Prior to any plat checking of Riverway Villa for phased finalization of the plat the aforementioned analysis shall be completed. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES (UPDATED) 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on- site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The dedication shall state: PE- 1414 -81 Page 8 "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94." 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 4. The dedication shall state: "Each new dwelling unit shall be double - plumbed for connection to future areawide collection systems." 5. A dry sewer connection to the future areawide sewerage system shall be constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer connection shall be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. 6. Applicant shall make connection to public sewer system. Sewer connection permit is required. Plans and specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. 7. The 37 lots proposed for Riverway Villa First Addition is authorized for the use of on site disposal systems.and shall provide double plumbing and a dry sewer. Any future phases of Riverway Villa shall connect to an interim public system or connect to a permanent public sewer facility. Riverway Villa First Addition shall connect to the interim facility or public sewer when available. Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page 9 SPOKANE COIJNTY HEALTH DTSTRICI' (UPDATED) 1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any attached sheets as noted. 2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each tract of the plat. 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County/City of Spokane, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot/tract purchaser refused a building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 10. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health officer, the use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems may be authorized for 37 units of blocks 1 -6 (Riverway Villa First Addition). 1 I . A public sewer system . will be made available for the remainder of the plat, and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. 12. The dedicatory language of the plat will state: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of on -site sewage disposal systems may be authorized for 37 units of blocks 1 -6 (Riverway Villa First Addition)." 13. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will be made available for the remainder of the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale." 14. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 15. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant to the water plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building and Safety Department, and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot/tract prior to sale of each lot/tract and prior to issuance of a building permit for each tract." Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page10 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS (UPDATED) 1. The applicant shall contact the Department of Buildings at the earliest possible stage of design/development in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include: fire apparatus access roads; fire hydrant/flow; approved water systems; building accessibility; construction type; occupancy classification; exiting; exterior wall protection; and energy code regulations. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF ANY FINAL PLAT: 1. A traffic analysis shall be prepared for the Barker Road interchange and shall contain the following elements: a. Site Map (illustrating the complete circulation system) b. Vicinity Maps) (illustrating traffic distribution) c. Existing Transportation Conditions 1. Existing average daily traffic 2. Existing AM and PM peak hour level of service 3. Existing AM and PM peak hour turning movements d. Projected Transportation Conditions with this Development 1. Projected Average Daily Traffic 2. Projected AM and PM peak hour level of service 3. Projected AM and PM peak hour turning movements e. Recommended mitigating measures 1 Mitigating measures sufficient to maintain existing Level of Service 'D" 2. If the existing Level of Service "D" cannot be maintained a justification should be included NO1'E: The ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual (5th Edition) shall be used as a basis to compute u generation rates of the proposed developments. 2. That the applicant agree to fund and construct the necessary mitigating measures as outlined in the above traffic study. These mitigating measures must be approved by both WSDOT and Spokane County Engineers prior to the issuance of any building permits for this property. 3. Due to the trip generation potential, any further development other than what is proposed will require further review by WSDOT to assure additional trips are safely accommodated. `L DATED THIS " ») DAY OF MAY, 1993. ALLIS"D. HU13BARD DIRECTOR For: Thomas Veljic, Planner.I Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with the appropriate processing Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page 11 fee payable to the Spokane County Planning Department, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456 -2205. c: County Engineer County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety County Parks Department of Transportation Central Valley School District Trinity Enterprises, 2128 North Pines, Suite 17 - 9, Spokanc,.WA 99206 John Clardy, P 0 Box 762, Deer Park, WA 99006 North Idaho Engineering, 4200 West Seltice Way, Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 3 y /993 BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN THE MATTER OF AN • ID ' �' OF TIME REQUEST FO t3 14I AND ZE- 92 -81, RIVERW IL A, APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH PUD OVERLAY, PUDE -1. -81 FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from North Idaho Engineering has been received and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter III, Section G) and RCW 58.17.140. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning. 2. The subject preliminary plat and Planned Unit Development concept plan was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on April 2, 1982. The sponsor submitted a final development plan for the southern portion of the site and change of conditions which was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on April 14, 1983 The development consisted of a manufactured home subdivision on 118 acres for 365 lots including open space and one commercial lot. The proposed plat was accompanied by a rezone from Agricultural (A) to Residential Manufactured Home (RMH) with Planned Unit Development under the, now expired, Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. A final development plan and change of 'conditions were approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee at a second public hearing. The approved final development plan was for the southern portion of the site and consisted of a maximum of 178 lots on approximately 50 acres. A final development plan for the remaining northern portion of the site would require a public hearing. 3. The proposal is generally Located south of the Spokane River, east of Barker Road, and north of Mission Avenue in Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 45 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. 4. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5), previously established as Agricultural (A) zoning in 1957 (ZE- 286 -57) and redesignated to Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) on January I, 1991 consistent with the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. The proposal also requested a zone reclassification which would correspond to the Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) zone under the current county zoning regulations. The proposed development is consistent with Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) density standards however, it has not been reviewed for consistency with all current development standards. 5. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. 6. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and department policy for short subdivisions. These criteria are found in Chapter III, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this decision. Section G states, "Approval of a preliminary subdivision shall automatically expire three years after preliminary approval is granted unless a time extension is applied for." and follows with "Upon application for time extension , the Planning Director or designee may administratively approve extensions for up to three (3) year periods provided at least one of the following circumstances is fount to apply:" The following are the relevant sections of Section G and the Planning Department response: Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page 2 1. That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the last extension was granted and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval; RESPONSE: The owner has been granted five (5) extensions of time since the original approval by the Hearing Examiner Committee on April 2, 1982. No portion of the site has been finalized and recorded as a final plat. 2. That the preliminary plat as approved remains consistent with the Generalized Comprehensive Plan for Spokane County insofar as density AND other development provisions apply, and the sponsor has taken substantial steps towards finalizing his plat, which shall include but not be limited to: a. surveying the lots within the development, b. arranging for public services to the site, c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary plat, d. the completion of studies or other requirements which were part of preliminary plat approval; RESPONSE: There has not been any plat activity since the last time extension was granted on January 13, 1992. A draft final plat for 37 residential lots and 2 common lots was attached to the extension of time application but no formal submittal has been made or final plat fees collected. 3. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This provision shall not apply to public utility extension which the project sponsor would normally. fund. RESPONSE: Does not apply. 7. No additional conditions have been recommended by the various reviewing agencies and departments, including the County Engineers Office, County Health District, County Utilities and the Department of Building & Safety. The Central Valley School District (# 356) has submitted comments and indicated that existing school facilities are at capacity. 8. This is the fifth request for a time extension. The total life of the preliminary plat has been approximately eleven (11) years: April 1982 to April 1983 April 1983 to April 1986 November 1986 to December 1988 December 1988 to January 1990 January 1990 to January 1992 January 1992 to January 1993 DECISION Preliminary approval and change of conditions Three years granted with change of conditions 2 years 2 years 2 years 1 year 9. The following facts are also relevant. a. A portion of the site falls under the jurisdiction of the Washington State Shoreline Management Act, RCW 90.58, and the Spokane County Shoreline Program, WAC 173 -19 -400. b. The extension of time request was incomplete insofar as the entire site was not included for consideration. The applicant requested an extension of time for the southem one half of the site. The Planning Department notified the applicant of the error and an addendum to the application was submitted on February 26, 1993. 10. The applicant/owner has not shown compliance with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance therefore, this time extension is not justified. BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request for application PE- 1414 -81, Riverway Villa, is hereby DENIED. ot Extension of Time Findings DATED THIS . " DAY OF MARCH, 1993. PAUL JENSEN, SENT R PLANNER For Thomas Veljic: Planner I PE- 1414 -81 Page 3 Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with $200 processing fee payable to the Spokane County Planning Department, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456 -2205. c: County Engineer County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety Trinity Enterprises, North 2128 Pines, Suite 17 -9, Spokane, WA 99206 John Clardy, P O Box 762, Deer Park, WA 99006 North Idaho Engineering, West 4200 Seltice Way, Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION ) OF TIME REQUEST FOR PE- 1414 -81, ) FINDINGS OF FACT ZE- 92 -81, PUDE -1 -82 RIVERWAY ) CONCLUSIONS AND VILLA AN APPROVED PRELIMINARY ) DECISION PLAT ) THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from H. and E. Investments has been received and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter 111, Section G) and RCW 58.17.140. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning. 2. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on April 2, 1982 and April 8, 1983. 3. If finalization of this subdivision does not occur prior to January 1, 1991, the existing zoning will be changed to the appropriate 'new zone,' of the Zoning Code which may have different standards or uses than originally requested. 4. Spokane Couhty has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and department policy for short subdivisions. These criteria are found in Chapter III, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this decision. 5. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area: The Comprehensive Plan designation remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. 6. No additional conditions have been recommended by the various reviewing agencies and departments, including the County Health District, County Utilities and the Department of Building & Safety. The County Planning Department and the County Engineer's Department has recommended updated and new conditions of approval based on the new Zoning Code and the adoption of an Arterial Road Plan. 7. This is the fourth request for a time extension. The total life of the preliminary plat has been approximately nine years. 8. The following facts are also relevant. a. The sponsors were advised in the 1988 and 1990 time extension approval that it would be difficult to grant future extensions without all or a portion of the subdivision being finalized. b. The sponsor has not finalized any portion of the subdivision. c. The County has adopted since the approval of the proposal an Arterial Road Plan (on April 25, 1989) and also implemented a new Zoning Code (on January 1, 1991). d. This time extension process makes provisions for updating conditions of approval for the proposal which still remains consistent with County development guidelines. e. The Riverway Villa project will take several years to develop because of its size -- 118 acres and over 300 residential Tots. Review of the PUD approval indicated phasing was approved to mitigate impacts of the proposal by reducing the number of lots to be approved in each phase. f. The sponsor reports that Centennial Trail negotiations have taken nearly two years and were agreed upon in October of 1991. The agreement necessitates revision of a portion of the project. The proposal was originally approved for interim on -site sewage disposal until public sewers are made available to the site. The sponsor reports working with the County g. / -/9 Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page 2 Utilities Department to evaluate direct connection to the County Sewer System. The feasibility of such a connection is to a large degree dependent on the extent and location of interception lines constructed in 1992 -1993. h. The redesign of the proposal caused by both the Centennial Trail and use of county sewer would most likely require a public hearing. 9. This extension of time is granted based upon minimal progress, but due to circumstances beyond the applicant's control, several of which still exist since the last time extension was issued on January 8, 1990. Most serious reexamination of progress toward finalizing should be shown or future extensions will likely not be granted. CONCLUSIONS BASED UPON A REVIEW of (a) the criteria for approving an extension of time of the expiration date for a preliminary plat and (b) the above Findings of Fact, the following conclusions are made. 1. The Comprehensive Plan has not changed since the original approval of this proposal. 2. New conditions have been recommended and included with this approval by the County Planning Department and the County Engineer's Department. 3. The applicant/owner should show substantially greater progress toward complying with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time. DECISION BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request for application PE- 1414 -81, ZE- 92 -81, PUDE -1 -82 is hereby APPROVED until February 1, 1993. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. A consolidated set of applicable conditions of approval is attached. Additionally, the following apply. 2. Subsequent extension of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial compliance with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance; otherwise the preliminary subdivision approval will become null and void. COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant ", which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. 2. The preliminary subdivision applies to the following real property: That property within the preliminary plat of record known as PE- 1414 -81, Riverway Villa. 3. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for three (3) years, specifically to February 1, 1993. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request approximately forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 4. Upon filing the final plat, or a portion thereof, the zone reclassification of the final plat area shall be finalized, and the existing zone classification shall be changed to Urban Residential -7 (UR -7), Regional Business (B -3) and PUD overlay zone, consistent with the proposed zoning approved with the preliminary plat and PUD of record. 5. If multiple zones affect the property of a final plat, minor adjustments in official zoning boundaries may be approved to recognize lot line adjustments and road alignments at the time finalization occurs. 6. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page 3 7. The Planning Director /designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 8. A final plat name /number shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name /number to be approved by the Planning Director /designee.' 9. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. 10. A specific and detailed site improvement plan will be submitted for Planning Department review approval as part of the final plat review and prior to the issuance of a building permit, change of use permit or certificate of occupancy. Appropriate bonds or proof of construction must be submitted at the time of fmal plat review to cover the estimated cost of on -site improvements which were required as a part of the project approval. 11. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. 12. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the watersystem in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 13. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 14. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state - licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat," including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as- built" water system. 15. The Water Plan and the above four (4) conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director /designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 16. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 17. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 18. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the fmal plat. 19. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 20. The Spokane County Planning Department shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right -of -way and Extension of Time Findings PE- 1414 -81 Page 4 utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following: a. At least 10 feet along Mission Avenue and 5 feet along Barker Road of reserved future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities, in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right -of -way. NO1E: The County Engineer has required no additional dedication but previously required 10 feet of dedication along Mission Avenue and 15 feet along Barker Road as conditions of approval prior to this time extension. b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area. c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities. If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made. d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses. 21. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul -de -sac lots which meet or exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat. 22. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "Lot(s) [ ] , Block(s) [ ] are located on a temporary cul -de -sac. This temporary cul -de -sac may be extended to provide access to adjacent property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as development and/or circulation needs dictate." 23. The Planning Department shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal from the final disposition, including lapsing of appeal period, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows: "Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building or any use on the property described herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14.706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone). The property which is the subject of this notice is more particularly described as follows:... " 24. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 25. The District shall cooperate as needed with the Department of Building and Safety to ensure that adequate emergency medical service and firefighting apparatus access is accomplished via the private road. 26. The plat shall delineate the ordinary high - water mark (OHWM), the 200 feet of Shoreline Act jurisdiction and the 50- and 100 -foot horizontal setback lines from the OHWM. The dedication on the final plat shall state: - "At the time of approval of the final plat, this property fell under the jurisdiction of the Washington State Shoreline Management Act, RCW 90.58, and the Spokane County Shoreline Program, WAC 173 -19 -400. Any development of this property shall only proceed in strict compliance with the Shoreline Act rules and regulations in effect at the time of permit issuance." 27. The following conditions shall also be complied with on Lot 1, Block 1 of the preliminary plat of record which upon final plat approval, shall be changed to Regional Business (B -3) zoning subject to the following: a. That prior to issuing any building permits on Lot 1, Block 1, the commercial site, a specific site development plat (all or part) must be approved by the County Planning Director who will receive review comments from appropriate County departments. b. That the County Planning Director is directed to assure proper compliance with the Zoning Code, assure proper measures for compatibility between existing or future adjacent land uses and the commercial site, assure that the commercial uses do not exceed those of neighborhood and local serving stores or services, and consider Extension of Time Findings accommodation of "Park and Ride" space for the bus and/or a covered bus stop. Some items to be considered are: building size, height and setback, paving, parking, drainage, landscaping, signing, lighting, buffering delivery truck traffic from adjacent manufactured home with sight and sound obscuring fence (as a five foot masonry wall), ingress /egress, loading areas and others. c. That if the County Planning Director finds it appropriate due to problems or varying opinions, can bring the specific site development before the Hearing Examiner Committee for a decision at a public hearing. 28. The following conditions shall also be complied with on the portion of the site south of Indiana Avenue still as shown on the preliminary plat of record: a. Upon final plat approval this PUD overlay zone shall be mapped (except the Regional Business (B -3) lot). b. That each lot provide for off - street parking as required by the Zoning Ordinance for Residential Manufactured Home Zoning, that is, two parking spaces with 200 square feet per parking space. c. The March 15, 1983 revised preliminary plat of record is the plan of record for this portion of the site. d. That the final development plat is approved pursuant to the sponsor providing the "Minimum Construction Schedule" as listed in Section 1 and on the final development plan (revised preliminary plat of record dated March 15, 1983). Each item applicable to any phase being finalized will be required to be developed with that phase. e. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Planning Director /designee shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. 29. Phasing shall be approved by the departments reviewing the final plat. Mitigating impacts of traffic and schools shall be considered in approving phases of the development. 30. That proper reference to Home Owners Association agreements and other auditor recorded documents be made in each final plat dedication so as to notify any potential lot purchaser of such responsibilities associated with that lot ownership. 31. That all lots and blocks be indicated and common open space lots be labeled on each final plat. 32. That if the sponsor /applicant opts to establish solar access /exposure easements for a particular phase of this proposal, a copy of a "draft" final plat showing the location of proposed structures and building setback lines will be submitted for review and approval by the County Division of Buildings, the County Planning Department, the County Engineer's Department and the County Health District to determine which Tots may utilize zero lot line setbacks and any other measures necessary to assure fire safety and proper solar access. 33. That the most easterly final plats contain plat dedication which states: "Active agricultural pursuits with unusual working hours and the spraying of pesticides may be occurring on properties adjacent to lots within this plat until such time as this adjacent property is developed." COUNTY ENGINEER'S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS PE- 1414 -81 Page 5 All previously imposed conditions are still applicable. 1. The County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a Principal arterial and Mission Avenue as a Minor Arterial. The existing right -of -way width is not consistent with that specified in the Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan, in addition to the required right -of -way dedication, a strip of property 5 feet along Barker Road and 10 feet along Mission Avenue shall be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when arterial improvements are made to Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Extension of Time Findings COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS The Health District has no additional conditions or comments for this extension of time request. However, all previously imposed conditions of approval are still applicable. COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS The County Utilities Department has no additional conditions or comments for this extension of time request. However, all previously imposed conditions of approval are still applicable. COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS CONDITIONS The County Division of Buildings has no additional conditions or comments for this extension of time request. However, all previously imposed conditions of approval are still applicable. r� DATED THIS 1- DAY OF JANUARY, 1992. i--- Sens F. Jensen cy Senior Planner PE- 1414 -81 Page 6 Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with a $120 processing fee,to the Spokane County Planning Department, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456 -2205. sam c: County Engineer County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety 14. and E. Investments, 5503 East Broadway Avenue, Spokane, WA 99212 Inland Pacific Engineering, 25 South Altamont, Spokane, WA 99202 BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST ASSOCIATED WITH PE- 1414 -81, ZE -92 -81 AND PUDE -1.82 PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT AND PARTIALLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPEMENT / h1t P THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Gary A. Myers, Agent for H. & E. Investments has been received and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter III, Section G) and RCW 58.17.140. FINDINGS OF FACT FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS AND DECISIONAN APPROVAL OF 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning. 2. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and department policy for short subdivisions. Such extensions of time may be up to and including 3 -year extensions. 3. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on April 2, 1982 and April 8,1983. 4. If finalization of this subdivision does not occur prior to January 1,1991, the existing zoning will be changed to the appropriate 'new zone; which may have different standards or uses than originally requested. 5. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. 6. No additional conditions have been recommended by the various reviewing agencies and departments, including the County Engineer's Office, the Spokane County Health District, County Utilities and the Department of Building & Safety. 7. This is the third request for a time extension. The total life of the preliminary plat has been approximately seven years. 8. As set forth in Chapter III, Section G, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, the following is relevant. a) Approval of a preliminary subdivision shall automatically expire 3 years after the preliminary approval is granted unless a time extension is sought; the preliminary plat becomes null and void in the event there is no application for an extension of time. b) Approval for an extension of time for up to 3 years is discretionary, providing that at least one of the following is found to apply. i) Some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the last extension was granted, and the remaining lots would form a unified development Consistent with the original approval; ii) The preliminary plat shall remain consistent with the Comprehensive Plan insofar as density and other development provisions apply AND the sponsor has taken substantial steps toward finalizing the plat, including but not limited to those items set forth in the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter III, Section 0, a through d; or iii) When the preliminary plat approval was granted, development was conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available (this provision does not apply to public utilities extension which the project sponsor would normally fund). Extension of Time Findings • s File No. PE- 1414 -81 Page 2 10. The following facts are relevant to the above criteria. The sponsors were advised through the 1988 Time Extension approval that it would be difficult to grant future extensions without all or a portion of the subdivisions being finalized. b. The sponsors have not finalized any portion of the subdivision. c. The sponsor asked for a two (2) year extension to continue difficult negotiations with the Centennial Trail (Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission), to redesign a portion of the subdivision and to file a portion thereof. d. A letter from the Centennial Trail Coordinator indicates appraisal and negotiations with the sponsor are proceeding and have become drawn out. 11. This extension of time is granted based upon minimal progress, but due to unique circumstances, beyond the applicants control. Most serious reexamination of progress toward finalizing should be shown or future extensions will likely not be granted. CONCLUSIONS BASED UPON A REVIEW of (a) the criteria for approving an extension of time of the expiration date for a preliminary plat and (b) the above Findings of Fact, the following conclusions are made. 1. The sponsor has not met the absolute criteria but has demonstrated unique fustrations and problems associated with the property's development and an extension of two years is warranted. 2. It is not likely that delay caused by the Centennial Trail or unsuitable economic conditions will be recognized as support for future extensions of time. 3. The applicant/owner should show substantially greater progress toward complying with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time. 4. No new conditions of approval have been requested in the past or at the present. 5. The land use actions on this property consist of the original subdivision and zone reclassification application. DECISION BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request for application PE- 1414 -81, ZE -92 -81 and PUDE -1 -82 is hereby APPROVED until January 1, 1992. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The original conditions of approval from the previous land use actions are in effect. 2. Subsequent extensions of time will only be granted upon a finding of substantial compliance with the prevailing criteria for granting an extension of time. � DATED 15 t DAY OF JANUARY, 1990. THOMAS G. Senior Planner enclosure SHER, AICP Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with $100 f' Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1414 -81 Page 3 processing fee, payable to the Spokane County Treasurer, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456 -2205. kc c: County Engineer County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety H & E Investments, E. 5503 Broadway, Spokane, WA. 99212 Inland Pacific Engineering Co. Inc., S. 25 Altamont, Spokane, WA. 99202 File REV.11/89 File No: Name: PE- 1414 -81 RIVERNAY VILLA • • EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the preliminary plat was originally approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee in a public hearing on March 30, 1982. 2. That the zoning will be reclassified from Agricultural to Residential Mobile Home and Commercial with a Planned Unit Overlay. 3. That the Comprehensive Plan is designated as Urban and is within the PSSA area. 4. That since the original approval, the applicant has received one three -year extension of time for the preliminary and final development plan. 5. That no additional conditions have been recommended by other County agencies. 6. Public notice was given as required by the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and no comments were received from the public. DECISION Based on the foregoing findings, the Subdivision Administrator APPROVES an Extension of Time for two (2) years to November 1, 1988, subject to the conditions based upon Extension of Time guidelines of Subsection 2, Chapter 3, Section "G ", Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance cc: IPEC County Engineers County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety 46P bit •S S.i.D1`S Subdivisio Administrator April 8, 1983 Findings & Order C. FINDINGS OF,FACT ti-i' SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER File No. PE- 1414 -81 Riverway Villa A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee on April 8, 1983 and the members of the Committee present being Kathy Carstens, Chairperson, Rick Skalstad and Jerry Williams. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, H & E Investments, Inc., is requesting for Preliminary Plat PE- 1414 -81, RIVERWAY VILLA, Planned Unit Development PUDE -1 -82, FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, and Zone Reclassification ZE- 92-81, Agricultural to RMH and Commercial approval of: Change -of- Condition to the preliminary approval where 1. allow only half the proposal to have a FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, 2. allow more than six phase and change the required phasing limit from 8 years to 6 years (Planning Condition #3 of March 30, 1982, Hearing Examiner Committee Findings & Order), 3. allow individual on -site sewer treatment on particular lots, and 4. the preliminary plat of record is redesigned with fewer and larger lots and relocation of roads and reduction of area for "open- space." Extension -of -Time to the preliminary approval where 5. the N 1/2 and commercial lot of the proposal will be given 3 years to submit, for approval, a FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, 6. the preliminary Plat of Record approval be given a 3 -year extension, and 7. The S 1/2 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, also being the 3/15/83 Revised Preliminary Plat of Record, be given approval and extended for 3 years. Final Development Plan for 5 1/2 of proposal, there being present, the following applicant.or representative: Roger K. Anderson 1. That the "change" represents -fewer lots than originally approved. 2. That the redesign of the preliminary plat of record and P.U.D. complies with the standards of the Planned Unit Development zone. 3. That we have considered the "minimum construction schedule" and !'optimum development design." April 8, 1983 Findings & Order • 1 D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS DECISION Amend County Utilities Condition 1111 to read: - 2 - FiieiNo. PE- 1414 -81 Riverway Villa C. FINDINGS OF FACT (coned) 4. That environmental impacts identified in the E.I.S. were, in part, mitigated by requiring this proposal to be phased over a period of years, such as traffic and school population. 5. That a separate and second FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN review in three years will provide a more realistic decision for the N 1/2 and will allow the "then" plans, policies and regulations as well as housing market demands and trends to be considered with that review. 6. That County Uti,_ities Department has identified a maximum limit of 37 lots (that of the first phase as proposed) with on -site sewage treatment before requiring all lots (including these 37 lots) to connect to the required community sewer system. 7. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 8. That the April 7, 1983 Hearing Examiner Committee hearing was continued to April 8, 1983. 9. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 10. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as URBAN. 11. That the proposal lies within the adopted Priority Sewer Service Area of the Wastewater Management Plan.. 12. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapproval of the proposed use. 13. That we have visited the site. 14. That we have considered the information in the STAFF REPORT. 15. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds theproposed: use is not detrimental to the general purpose or otherwise harmful to the public health, safety, and welfare, as conditioned. Those conditions listed in the April 7, 1983 STAFF REPORT and amended as follows: April 8, 1983 File No. PE- 1414 -81 Findings & Order Riverway Villa D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS DECISION (cont'd) 11. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418 the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized for up to and including 37 lots in the south half of the Preliminary Plat /PUD. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application and approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer. (Additional lots being finalized beyond these 37 Tots will be required to connect to the community sewer treatment system including the 37 lots.) Change the 3/15/83 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - Sponsor's Minimum Development Requirements item 2. under heading Schedule to read: E. ORDER The first community common area will be dedicated and improved within one (1) year of the start of construction • of the second phase. The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application for the Change -of- Conditions, for the Extension -of -Time, and for the FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN of the approved preliminary plat PE- 1414 -81, Riverway Villa, and PUDE -1 -82, Planned Unit Development, and ZE- 92-81, Agricultural to RMH and Commercial is hereby APPROVED. Motion by: Jerry Williams Seconded by: Rich Skalstad Vote: UNANIMOUS Kathy Carstens - Aye Rich Skalstad - Aye Jerry Williams - Aye • 3 April 8, 1983 Findings E Order ATTEST: ay: \ /r X-wvt,/ � ' � / a cam Date: !K -vl Q 4, /✓53 /vr JOHN NUNNERY SubdiCision Administrator HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE. Chairperson - 4 - File No. PE- 1414 -81 Riverway Villa Examiner Committee Action - April 7, 19836 April 8, 1983 13. PE-1414-8i, RIVERWAY VILLA ZE- 92 -81, Agricultural to RMH and Commercial PUDE -1 -82, Planned Unit Development, an overlay zone Sponsor: 534 - 2657 Surveyor /Engineer: 535 H & E Investments, inc. Inland Pacific Engineering Co. E. 6614 Main c/o Dick Mason Spokane, WA 99206 S. 25 Altamont St. Spokane, WA 99202 Location: The proposal is located in Spokane Valley, south and adjacent the Spokane River, east and adjacent Barker Road, north and adjacent Mission Avenue, and west and adjacent Hodges Road extended; Section 8, Township 25N, Range 45 EWM., Spokane County, Washington . Comprehensive Plan: URBAN Proposal: See page 4 11. PE 1275 BRIDAL TRAIL MEADOWS ZE II - 79, Unclassified and Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban Sponsor: 924 - 2879 Surveyor /Engineer: 926 - 1322 William J. Wallace Richard L. Simpson P.O. Box 231 N. 909 Argonne Road Newman Lake, WA 99025 Spokane, WA 99206 Location: The proposal is located south of Newman Lake, approximately 1/2 mile south of Moffat Road, 1/4 mile east of Newman Lake Road and 1/8 mile northwest of Trent Avenue; Section 24, Township 26N, Range 45 EWM., Spokane County, Washington Comprehensive Plan: SUBURBAN • Proposal: The sponsor is requesting a change -of- condition to allow Tract "X" roads, an additional project access road from Newman Lake Road and a redesign of lots and road alignment of the preliminary plat • approval to divide 68 acres into 55 lots for single- family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 68 acres from Unclassified and Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban. Action: Approved unanimously for only one more year. 12. PE 1345 - 79, CARPENTER'S ADDITION ZE- 220 -79, Agricultural to R -1 Sponsor: 926 -1561 Arthur M. Noll E. 9211 Trent Spokane, WA 99206 :c l is located in the Spokane Valley east of Flora Road approximately 600 ft. and adjacent and south of Mission Ave.; Section 18, Township 25N, Range 45 EWM., . Spokane County, Washington Comprehensive Plan: URBAN Prposal: The sponsor is requesting a change -of- condition (a redesign to add two lots) of the preliminary plat approval to divide 4.7 acres into 13 lots for single - family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 4.7 acres from Agricultural to R -1. Action: Approved unanimously for 3 years. Surveyor /Enqineer: 924 -3444 Eugene H. Welborn E. 7011 Second Ave. Spokane, WA 99206 4 4 .F r hl Examiner Committee Act April 7, 19$3 & April 8, 19� - 4 • 13. PE- 1414 =8 RIVERWAY VILLA (continued) Proposal: The sponsor is requesting a change -of- condition of the preliminary plat and planned unit development approval: 1) that only half of the ' Final Development Plan be approved at this time, 2) that 6 or more finalization phases be allowed within a 6 -year period, 3) particular' lots be allowed individual sewer treatment and 4) a redesign of lots and roads; and a request to approve the first half FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. The overall proposal was approved to subdivide 118 acres into' 365 residential lots for planned unit development of mobile and • manufactured homes and one commercial lot and to change the zoning on the 118 acres from Agricultural to RMH and Commercial. Action: Approved unanimously. 14.=PN- 1427 -83, THE FARM ZN- 15 -83, Agricultural to R -1 and Agricultural S ponsor: 238 -9113 Surveyor /Engineer: 534 John G. Miller Senski £ Associates Rt. 3 Box 205 S. 104 Freya St. STE 203 Colbert, WA 99005 Spokane, WA 99202 fit Location: The proposal is located one mile east of Colbert, adjacent and 'north . of Bernhill Road in SW 1/4 of Section 13 and SE 1/4 of Section 14; .;, Section 13 & 14, Township 27N, Range 43 EWM., Spokane County, Washington Comprehensive Plan: RURAL "t 3 Proposal: The sponsor is requesting approval to subdivide 90 acres into 10 ,_ lots, 8 one -acre lots to be "clustered" for single-family dwellings IA. " and 2 "large lots" to be retained for agricultural pursuits with one .,: ,y single- family dwelling on each and to change the zoning on the 90 a acres from Agricultural to R -1 and Agricultural. , • 4 .; Action: Approved unanimously. ' All time extensions were granted for three (3) years to conform to Washington` State Subdivision law as changed July 1981, except as noted. The above action is SUMMARIZED. The detailed information, public record, findings • 1 k , of fact, decision, and conditions are available for public review at the Spokane, County Planning Department. ,nr April 2,- 1982 Findings & Order SPOKANE COUNTY •. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Spokane County Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee on March 30, 1982 and the members of the Committee present being Jerry Williams, Chairperson, John Culler, and Eltlon Thomas. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, H & E Investments, is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat and Zone Change for PE-1414 -81, Riverway Villa, and ZE- 92 -81, Agricultural to Residential Manufactured Homes and Commercial, and PUDE -1 -82, Planned Unit Development, for the subdivision of 118 acres into 365 lois for manufactured homes with common open space, plus one commerical site, and there being present, the following applicant or representative: a Jim Craven C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is predominately single- family homes west of Barker Road and predominately manufactured homes east of Barker Road and north of the Spokane River with approximately half of the near vicinity in cultivated field on both sides of Barker Road. 2. That the proposed manufactured home P.U.D. would be compatible with the surrounding land uses due to the many existing manufactured homes in the area. 3. That the proposal is well designed and thought out. 4. That when developed with the amenities as proposed, this development will be a complement to the community. 5. That the amenities will be considered to assure an attractive development when the P.U.D. Final Development Plan is acted on at a public hearing. 6. That great care has been taken to condition this development to assure resolution of problems and impacts as mentioned by the public in the public hearing and in the E.I.S. of the proposal. 7. That it would be detrimental for this proposal to require a 6 -ft. earthen berm, that the development should not be hidden. 1 File N PE- 1414 -81 7-E -92 -81 PUDE. -1 -82 April 2, 1982 Findings & Order File N PE- 1414 -81 a 7_E -92 -31 PUDr; -1 -82 8. That the sponsor should be required to work with adjacent property owners and acquire the necessary additional 15 -ft. of Barker Road dedi- cation to assure proper improvements on Barker Road between the Spokane River and Mission Avenue to accommodate traffic. . 9. That it is unreasonable to expect this development to pay toward improve- ments of the Barker Road /I -90 Interchange, since the Interchange is over two blocks (approximately 1/4 mile) away, and many other existing develop- ments generate traffic which also use the Interchange. That the public is responsible for such improvements. 10. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed both approval and disapproval of the proposed use. 11. That many of the public concerns for the existing traffic conjestion, speeding and safety for school children along Barker Road will be mitigated when this development sponsor widens Barker Road, adds sidewalks on Barker Road and Mission Avenue and will, if required, participate in signalization of the Mission- Barker intersection with cross - walks. 12. That the proposal is required to be finalized in 6 to 8 phases to evenly distribute the impacts (as traffic and school children) over 8- to 10- years. 13. That the proposal site is a cultivated field. 14. That the existing zoning of the proposal site is Agricultural Zone. 15. That the. Comprehensive Plan designates this and the surrounding area as URBAN. '. 16. That the proposal, as conditioned, does significantly comply with many of the major policies of the plan; as urban setting and level of services, fill -in, providing a variety of lifestyles, buffering, utilities, sidewalks, water quality, energy management, transportation, and Wastewater Manage- ment Plan. 17. That the proposed R.M.H. zoning with P.U.D. overlay zone is suitable for the zoning and land use of the area. 18. That the proposed. commercial zone, conditioned for neighborhood and local serving uses is appropriate for the existing and future residential needs of the area and is properly located at a major arterial intersection. 19. That the provisioris of RCW 43.21C (The Slate Environmental Policy Act.) have been complied with. 20. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 21. That the Draft and Final E.I.S. were considered. 2 April 2., 1982 • Findings & Order File NO PE-1414-81 ZE -92 -81 PUDE. -1 -82 22. That the March 30, 1982, Staff Analysis was considered. 23. That the public written and verbal testimony was considered. 24. The Hearing Examiner finds the proposed use as conditioned is ,;ot detri- mental to the general purpose or otherwise harmful Lo the public, health, safety, and welfare. D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS SUBDIVISION APPROVAL: 1. Those conditions within the March 30, 1982 Staff Analysi except as amended below. 2. Amend PLANNING CONDITION #14, to read as follows: That if the sponsor /applicant opts to establish solar access /exposure easements for a particular phase of this proposal, a copy of a "draft" final plat showing the location of proposed structures and building setback' lines will be submitted for review and approval by the County Building & Safety Department, the .County Subdivision Administrator, the County Engineer 's Department, and the County Health District to determine which lots 'may utilize' zero lot line setbacks and any other measures necessary to assure fire safety and proper solar access. • 3. Amend ENGINEER CONDITION #14 to read as follows: Existing County roads providing access to the plat shall be paved and curbed to the Spokane County Standards. 4. Amend ENGINEER CONDITION #24 by deleting all but 3rd paragraph so as to read as follows: Traffic analysis for each phase will serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Should the analysis determine a need for intersection upgrading, the developer will be assessed a proportionate share for the required improve- ments. E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of PE- 1414 -81, Riverway Villa, and ZE -92 -81 Agricultural to R.M.H. and Commercial and PUDE -1 -82, Planned Unit Development, for a preliminary plat and zone change is hereby APPROVED. Motion by: Culler Seconded by: Thomas Vote: Unanimous 3 April 2,, 1982 Findings & Order. ATTEST: JOHN NUNNERY Subdivision Administrator FO -H /b Jerry Williams -.aye John Culler - aye Eldon Thomas - aye File a PE- 1414'81 ZE -92 -81 PIJDE-1 -82 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE January 15, 1997 Todd Whipple, P.E. Inland Pacific Engineering 707 West 7th Avenue Spokane, WA 99204 Gentlemen: Very truly yours, DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Plan Change Approval - Mission /Harmony .S P O K A N S r'i� ' r i ` i f C O 13 N T Y • A Division! OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director We are enclosing a copy of the approved plan change for this location. In order to begin construction, the original mylar set of the current plans on file at the County Engineer's Office will need to be revised and re- approved, so that the construction plans may be re- issued Please note that a permit will be required for that portion of the work to be accomplished or conducted within the County right of way. Please call Ed Parry to coordinate the method of the plan revisions, as well as to coordinate when the plans will be updated. The following methods will be acceptable: • Pen - and -ink revisions; • Re -issue of the affected plan sheets; • A supplemental plan sheet added to the current plan set; • A combination of the above, or another mutually agreeable method. Any questions regarding plan revisions should be addressed to Ed Parry. Sylvia Lightfoot will be able to assist with questions related to permit require%yts. They may be reached at 456 -3600. Thank you. ll..��YYnnee��ll�•// 'IV r ,�s e qtr • ri S William A. Johns, P. E. Spokane County Engineer Edwar J. rry, Jr., P.E. 41 ' Plan Review Engineer coiroject file review 6 W. B oadwa A, e. • Spo , W 9 92,6p 01ZU E (�Q9 �56 - 3600 FAX: (504) 324 TDD: (509) 324 - 3166 Mark . eati HouselY Co nn an 6! Il IV t t Street, R AX: P d W ROAD NAME MISSION AVENUE ClIP REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION $30.00 NAME OF PLAT RIVERWALK 1 S ADDITION Plat# PE -1414 -81/95 ADDRESS OF BLDG N/A NAME OF BLDG PROJECT NIA_ BLDG# B9 N/A S __ T 2511 R45H WM FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT # N/A PROJECT LIMITS EXISTING CONDITIONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: ROAD WIDTH 24' *- 40 ROAD SURFACE ACP ACP AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC 2400 ADT 3120 ADT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION JUSTIFICATION: PHONE# (509) 458 -6840 /4 17 Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count SEE ATTACHED LETTER SEE ATTACHED LETTER SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATE NOVEMBER 8, 1996 CRP /RID # N/A SUBMITTED BY TODD WHIPPLE, P.E., INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING. INC. DATE NOVEMBER 8. 1996 ADDRESS 707 WEST 7TH AVENUE. SUITE 200. SPOKANE. WA ZIP CODE 99204 * * * * * ** ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF $30.00 PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260 -0170 PHONE (509)456 -3600 FAX (509)324 -3478 ( g - REQUEST WILL NOT BE REVIE O FUNDS- J/ CASH /CHECK l Ib lV I # / RECEIVED BY =y "Y DATE ///� ! jam/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 2econsx£ae ,4ffaott(— o44-2{. Cot owze -mil Phi" A SintT tS agnb SCIee enure rK& Cis Acoporf . Approved Approved w /conditions () ( inita giant, ‘opr ed Approved w /conditions Not Approved O () Approved Approved w /conditions ) ( ) SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS DETERMINATION: Approved w /no conditions Approved as recommended above Not Approved Not Approved () Not Approved ( ) DESIGN DEVIATION Project Manager Date Of c 7 0 4 Project Management Engineer Date 79 7 Operations Engineer Date ROAD NAME Indiana Avenue PHONE # (509) 458 -6840 3( 7 REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION $30.00 DATE August 3, 1995 CRP/RID # N/A NAME OF PLAT Riverwalk P.D.D. - oz Plat # ZE- 92- ZE -92 -81 ADDRESS OF BLDG N/A PE 1414 - 51 NAME OF BLDG PROJECT N/A BLDG# B9 S 8 T25N. R 45E. FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT # N/A PROJECT LIMITS N/A EXISTING CONDITIONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: ROAD WIDTH 40' 40' ROAD SURFACE Asphalt Asphalt AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC N/A N/A Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count PROJECT DESCRIPTION Riverwalk Phase 2 and 3 is a 90 lot PUD with private interior streets with access to the project from Indiana Avenue, a public local access street. Improvements include public sewer, water, street, and drainage improvements. PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION To construct the temporary turn- around at the end of Indiana Avenue with Hammerhead configuration as shown on Attachment " A " . JUSTIFICATION: Spokane Valley Fire Department, District #1 has approved the configuration as shown on Attachment "A" (copy of letter attached as reference), and in accordance with Section 3.22 of Spokane County Standards adopted January 1995, and previous design deviation approved 7/21/95, that provisions are made for the roads to be open for emergency and public service vehicle use. An easement will be granted for public and emergency vehicle use of Snake River Lane as necessary to use the Hammerhead configuration. The public and private street intersection provides more than the required Hammerhead minimum standards as required by Section 10.204 of the 1991 Uniform Fire Code for dead end roads over 150'. SUBMITTED BY Inland Pacific Engineering Company, Inc. DATE August 3, 1995 ADDRESS 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200, Spokane, Washington ZIP CODE 99204 ss►■•w+ ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF $30.00 PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260 -0170 PHONE (509)456 -3600 FAX (509)324.3478 - REQUEST WILL NOT BE REVIEWED ITH /C FUNDS - CASH HECK v >IGk# RECEIVED BY DATE k gn.de 8/93 — 3 —T. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS .2 Pao /Am Ex 0 DOOM- . Cst EKCeery verb ct.6S Approved Approved w /conditions ) ( ) Approved Approved w /conditions Not A Approved Approved w /conditions ) ( ) SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S DETERMINATION: nor APR2oret+4 Foe rtmA tw*n(6 •`tu0 Not Approved (✓) Not Approved Approved Approved w /conditions Not Approved � ) O (/) DESIGN DEVIATION Project Manager Planning & Traffic Engineer Project Management ngineer Operations Engineer Approved w /no conditions Approved as recommended•above Not Approved c ) c ) _ Spokane County Engineer erk Date Date Date rG ZI -9r Date DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., Acting County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director August 30, 1995 Bruce Howard IPEC Gentlemen: SUBJECT: P1414A/P1414B - Riverwalk Design Deviation The Design Deviation Request for a hammerhead turnaround at the easterly terminus of Indiana Avenue has been disapproved; the proposed configuration is not appropriate for vehicles maintaining public roads. A copy is enclosed. If you have any questions, please call me at 456 -3600. Very truly yours, William A. Johns, P. E. Acting Spokane County Engineer ? -c, Edward J. Parry, Jr., P.E. Plans Review Engineer encls: Design Deviation Request cc: project file reviewer 1026W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 PROJECT #: Description: Purpose Remarks INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: Spokane County Engineers Office 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, Wa. 99260 -0170 ATTENTION: Ed Parry, P.E. No. Copies Description 1 Design Deviation 1 $30.00 Check #10466 Signed: Bruce A. Howard, E.I.T. cc: file DATE August 3, 1995 I P E.0 PROJ # '95 PROJECT NAME: Addition ❑ Prints ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Copies of app. plans ❑ Original Drawing ❑ Contract Documents ❑ ❑ Work Authorization ❑ Drainage Report • Design Deviation • Information III Review & Comments ❑ Per Your Request • Written Approval ❑ Signature & Return ❑ Ed- Please review and comment as necessary. If you need any further information, or have questions, please feel free to call me at our office. RED VED AUG 0 3 1995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SPRANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMEL. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 Bruce Howard Inland Pacific Engineering 707 W. 7th, Suite 200 Spokane, Wa. 99204 Re: Riverwalk 3rd Addition, Temporary Turn Around Dear Mr. Howard: I have reviewed your proposal for a temporary turn around for the lots just East of Indiana and Snake River. We will accept this proposal as you have outlined in a letter dated April 2, 1993. I have enclosed a copy of that two page letter. PC /bd Encl 10319 EAST SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WA 99206 -3676 • (509) 928 -1700 • FAX (509) 927 -2227 CC: Lewis Webster Spokane Co. Planning Dept July 31, 1995 Sincerely, J. Paul Chase Fire Marshal RECEIVED AUG - 21995 I.P.E.C. PROPOSED TEMPORARY TURNAROUND r L TEMPORARY TURNAROUND RIVERWALK P.U.D. 7/20/95 I I INLAND II IC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 Spokane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844 RECEIPT Received From Ad r ress or t0 0 ri 3 19415 911 3 Dollars $ 0 -0 Date ■r e i c km, CASH vi MONEY ORDER AMT. OF ACCOUNT AMT. PAID BALANCE DUE HOW PAID Y �� 8K808 REDIFORM Memorandum Date: August 3, 1995 To: Bill Hemmings From: Ed Parry 0° Subject: P1414A - Riverwalk 2nd Addition Design Deviation 1. IPEC is requesting a deviation from the requirement to provide a temporary cul -de -sac at the termination point of Indiana in this phase. IPEC proposes to provide a hammerhead turnaround (acceptable to the Fire District), with an easement to the County. 2. This situation is similar to Tanager East, in that the Developer does not want to provide a temporary cul -de -sac; the adjacent owner, however, is apparently the Developer himself in this case (per my discussions with Bruce Howard at IPEC), instead of the unfriendly neighbor in the Tanager East case. A temporary turnaround was provided at the termination of Indiana in phase 1 of this project. 3. We should recommend that the County Engineer deny this request for Design Deviation and the Developer should be required to provide the temporary . cul -de -sac in accordance with the•SCRS. ROAD NAME See Attachment A & B NAME OF PLAT Riverwalk PUD ADDRESS OF BLDG N/A NAME OF BLDG PROJECT N/A FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT # N/A REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION $30.00 EXISTING CONDITIONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: ROAD WIDTH N/A See Attachment A, B, C, & D ROAD SURFACE N/A See Attachment A, B, C, & D AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC N/A N/A Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count PROJECT DESCRIPTION Riverwalk Phase 2 and 3 is a 90 lot PUD with private interior streets and access to the project from Indiana Avenue. Improvements include public sewer, water, street, and drainage improvements. PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION Please see Attachment "A" JUSTIFICATION: ADDRESS PHONE # 1 - /Q- Q S Please see Attachment "A" and "B" SUBMII I'ED BY Inland Pacific Engineering Co. 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200, Spokane, WA (509) 458 -6840 DATE CRP /RID # PROJECT LIMITS N/A June 28, 1995 N/A YUDE -I -8d Plat # ZE -92 -81 PE- 1414 -81/ BLDG# B9 S 8 T 25 R 45 DATE June 28, 1995 ZIP CODE 99204 ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF $30.00 PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260 -0170 PHONE (509)456 -3600 FAX (509)324 -3478 - REQUEST WILL NOT BE REVIEWED W LOUT FUNDS - / �J�, CASH/CHECK _# RECEIVED BY 4 DATE �O — 99 kk Aded 897 L STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS k's rernrev are o{tL-- UP tat oaf€ ZOA409c5 cc MIFT - S�-n t. r "349- rs APPeaci) `tom see/1/1 arF. tab/1 s Approved Approved w /conditions ) Approved Approved w /conditions c ) )t,) Approved Appr ed w /conditions ) ) Approved Approved w /conditions c ) V( SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S DETERMINATION: DESIGN DEVIATION Not Approved c A ppR- t) ( 2 4.4rt to wi rrf 0q -go vg Cari.p /Trar.(- Not Approved c 4 -95/7a A di /771 Stve re9w7aMa2-T Not Approved � Not Approved c Project Manager Planning & Traffic Engineer Project Management Engineer Date O e att i' ons Engineer P g Approved w /no conditions Approved as recommended above Not Approved ) Spokane County Engineer Date Date Date - Date Memorandum Date: July 12, 1995 To: Bill Hemmings From: Ed Parry 4 1 n Subject: P1414 - Riverwalk (formerly Riverway Villa) Design Deviations 1. IPEC is requesting 2 different deviations at this time. The first request proposes that the northerly portion of the project, to include improvements for Indiana Avenue, wouldg and approved in accordance with the procedure stated in Sections 5.01, 9.01 through 9.10 and 10.01 through 10.03 of the 1995 SCRS; this request is based on the fact that the project is currently under the 1981 SRCS, which does not allow the streamlined review process. The second request proposes several private road sections, and a section for Indiana Avenue similar to that provided in Riverwalk 1st Addition (P1414). This request is based on IPEC's assumption that the project is now under the 1995 SCRS, since the date of the time extension is after the implementation date of the current SCRS. It would seem that if the 1981 SCRS was the governing standard at the time of approval, then the 1981 SCRS should remain as the governing standard through the various Time Extensions until such time as either the Preliminary Plat Approval expires, or the Conditions of Approval for the Time Extension specifically state that the project shall meet the requirements of the 1995 SCRS. 2. We should provide these recommendations to the County Engineer a. Proposed review /approval procedure: Recommend APPROVAL The roads serving the plat north of Indiana are all private roads; Indiana is a public road. Since the County has no real interest outside of the public right -of -way (other than impacts from drainage contributed by private parcels), the engineer should be allowed to follow the review process listed in Sections 3.22 (for private roads) and 5.01 (for public roads) of the current P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. Design Deviation Requests July 12, 1995 Page 2 of 2 SCRS. The engineer should also be given the responsibilities noted in Section 9 and 10 of the current SCRS. b. Proposed private road sections: Recommend APPROVAL The proposed road sections differ from the standard in that either a contiguous sidewalk is provided, or a separated sidewalk without a 208 swale is provided. The proposed sidewalks meet the 6 foot width requirement for the P.U.D. overlay in the Zoning Code. The pavement exceeds the minimums required in the 1981 SCRS (the apparent governing standard), and also meets the requirements of the 1995 SCRS. c. Proposed Indiana Avenue road section: Recommend APPROVAL The road section for Indiana Avenue required by the 1981 SCRS is a Collector Arterial (Section #2), with a width (dimension "W ") of 40' (measured face to face of curb), with a contiguous sidewalk. Since the 16 Jun 95 Extension of Time is silent as to the governing edition of the SCRS, it would be reasonable to assume that this project is still governed by the 1981 SCRS. If the 16 Jun 95 Extension of Time for the plat is read to require compliance with the 1995 SCRS, then the 40' roadway width (dimension "W ") is measured from toe to toe of the gutter, resulting in a width of 43' between the curb faces; a separated sidewalk section would also be required. Since phase 1 of this project will have constructed approximately ''4 mile of Indiana with a 40' width between the curb faces, and contiguous sidewalk, it would be reasonable to allow Indiana Avenue to continue at 40' between the curb faces, with a contiguous sidewalk, to some logical transition point (such as a road intersection) with the contiguous sidewalk section. The 40' pavement width between gutters, with a separated sidewalk section should be constructed beyond the transition point. The County Engineer should approve continuation of the existing road section. Justification Justification EXHIBIT "A" Proposed Design Deviation #1 This request is to allow the final plat known as Riverwalk P.U.D. to be reviewed and approved under the recently adopted "Application Procedure" as described in the 1995 S"ok n- Co tit Standards for R".d an Sewer Con ion The project will be designed in conformance with the road sections contained in the EXTENSION OF TIME and the preliminary plat (PE- 1414 -81/ PUDE -1 -82/ ZE- 92 -81). The recent adoption of the 1995 Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction has left some preliminary plats in a crossover status from the old standards to the new standards. Therefore, to maintain continuity in the project, we propose the entire north half, including Indiana Avenue, to be reviewed under the same review process. Proposed Design Deviation #2 This request is for the approval to construct the private streets and Indiana Avenue as shown on Attachment B. (Please See Attachments) Due to the development of the north half into two separate communities we would like to get 2 private roadway sections approved. The first section includes an integral sidewalk behind the curb, while the second section is an alternate section providing a planting strip between the sidewalk and the curb. A) Interior private streets: For both the empty nester and non -empty nester community (general family community), a sidewalk will be placed on one side of the roadway adjacent to the curb, with an alternate planting strip section available. Both sections provide more than the required 28' of pavement. B) Indiana Avenue: The existing cross section is constructed with Type "B" curb and gutter as shown on the North Idaho Engineering plans, with 40' face of curb to face of curb. We want to keep continuity with this cross section for the entire project. 'JUL -12 -1995 0E:53 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Telephone - (509) 458 -6840 FAX - (509) 458 -6844 NLAND PACIFIC ENG P.01 • DATE: Aar 12, • TO: �a F.+€ctr • COMPANY: 4 .5110/44fthir LD. 45;4" G • FAX NUMBER: ) 31 34'f • FRO UMBER OF PAGES: INCL. COVER PAGE 3 PCu JOB NUMBER �e-fsg/ ave .tars au6LTv.4As aarsc e a .,t e,d,...,. FAX TRANSMISSION • 'JUL -12 -1995 00:53 NLAND PACIFIC ENO INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL TO: Spokane County Engineers Office 1026 W. Broadway Spokane Wa. 99260-0170 ATTENTION: Ed Parry, P.E. PROJECT #: PE- 1414.81 Description: ❑ Prints ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Copies of app. plans ❑ Original Drawing ❑ Contract Documents ■ Design Deviation ❑ Work Authorization ❑ Drainage Report ❑ No. Copies Description 1 Revised Exhibit "A" (Justification) Purpose • Information • Review & Comments ❑ Per Your Request • Written Approval ❑ Signature & Return ❑ Remarks 707 W. 7th Avenue, Spite 200 Spokane, WA (508)458.6840 Fax: {500)452.6844 Ed- Please amend the attached Exhibit "A" to the previously submitted Design Deviation. I have changed the request to match the information presented on the Design Deviation for The Meadows 1st Addition. Thank you for your quick response. If you need any further information, or have questions, please feel free to call me at our office. Signed: Bruce A. Howard, E.I.T. cc: file P. 02 f #TH'IRT:Y AND 1.oI?;:DOLLARS • SP01 ANE CDUNTY, ENGINEERS: r' WASHINGTON :XRUST. BANK ,.. :•�SFONANE: wA- 9921PI1m. >; INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO INC ,..r. F,: GENERAL ACCOUNT NIAND5PACIFICiENGINEERING CO' ;; 707 -,W- 7TH AVE ;SUITE`200'% . .. . )';SPOKANE: WA(99204 'c �_.. ;:(509)1458.8840 ;. IE OF r 19 7 2225 RECEIPT Date 7-(.4 Received From T/5 Dollars $ 3C/ A mess For7y ' i 1„ 1 AMT. OF ACCOUNT ACCOUNT AMT. PAID 1 3 0 l 6. 0 1 CHEcx BALANCE DUE MONEY ORDER 02 HOW PAID By 81(808 RECIFORM INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL TO: Spokane County Engineers Office 1026 W. Broadway Spokane Wa. 99260 -0170 ATTENTION: Ed Parry, P.E. PROJECT #: PE- 1414 -81 Description: • Prints ❑ Original Drawing ❑ Work Authorization No. Copies Description 1 Design Deviation 1 Exhibit "A" (Justification) 1 Exhibit "B" ( Proposed X- sections) 1 Review Fee Check #10366 ($30.00) Purpose • Information • Review & Comments ❑ Per Your Request • Written Approval ❑ Signature & Return ❑ Remarks 707 W. 7th Avenue, Sulte 200 Spokane, WA (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458 -6844 Ed- Please review the attached Design Deviation. I feel we have tried to accommodate the new County Standards in the design of these cross sections. If you find an error or a misunderstanding of the new standards on my part, please let me know as soon as possible. If you need any further information, or have questions, please feel free to call me at our office. Signed: Bruce A. Howard, E.I.T' cc: file ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Contract Documents ❑ Drainage Report DATE July 1995 P.EC PROJECT :#; PROJECT NAME. Riverwalk PU. Phase 2 and> Phase 3s ❑ Copies of app. plans • Design Deviation 0 6RECE!VED JUL p 6 1995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER JUL, -12 -1995 08:54 'NLAND PACIFIC ENG Justification EXHIBIT "A" Proposed Design Deviation #1 This request is to allow the final plat known as Riverwalk P.U.D. to be reviewed and approved under the recently adopted "Application Procedure" as described in Sections 5.01, 9.01 - 9.10, and 10.01 - 10.03 of the 1995 Spokane ('.aunty Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, The project will be designed in conformance with the road sections contained in the EXTENSION OF TIME and the preliminary plat (PE- 1414 -81/ PUDE- 1 -82/ ZE- 92 -81). The recent adoption of the 1995 Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction has left some preliminary plats in a crossover status from the old standards to the new standards. Therefore, to maintain continuity in the project, we propose the entire north half, including Indiana Avenue, to be reviewed under the same review proce ss. Proposed Design Deviation #2 This request is for the approval to construct the private streets and Indiana Avenue as shown on Attachment B. (Please See Attachments) P.03 Justification Due to the development of the north half into two separate communities we would like to get 2 private roadway sections approved. The first section includes an integral sidewalk behind the curb, while the second section is an alternate section providing a planting strip between the sidewalk and the curb. A) Interior private streets: For both the empty nester and non -empty nester community (general family community), a sidewalk will be placed on one side of the roadway adjacent to the curb, with an alternate planting strip section available. Both sections . provide more than the required 28' of pavement. B) Indiana Avenue: The existing cross section is constructed with Type "B" curb and gutter as shown on the North Idaho Engineering plans, with 40' face of curb to face of curb. We want to keep continuity with this cross section for the entire project. 'OAD WIDTH )AD SURFACE VG. DAILY TRAFFIC contain an entrance sign to the South. r PI-T" gr (20$ 667-11 71 . REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION DATE 12/7/94 Pavement 2,000 /Day 3UBMITTID BY North Idaho Engineering, Inc. DATE 12/9/94 ROAD NAME Indiana Avenue (Villa Avenue) CRP/FUD7 .fit . NAME OF PAT - Riverwalk First. Addition Plat # P1 41 44 ADDRESS OF BLDG NAME OF BLDG PROJECT BLDG* 39 _ _ S _ T _ R FEDERAIJSTATE PROJECT # PROJECT LIMITS EXISTING CONDITIONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: 40' Current Tanta Count Design Year Tra[fic Count PROJECT DESCRIPTION Urban Housing Development PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION Design deviation at Intersection of 3arker Road and Indiana Avenue (Villa Avenue). Proposed- addition of a median which will JUSTIFICATION: Addition of the median will not result in any change to the road alignment. It will however widen Indiana Avenue (Villa Avenue) by 20' at the intersectie of Barker Road. The 60' width will continue along...Indiana Avenue (Villa Avenue) . East for 45' and then taper back to the original 40' road width. Ail widening to the road will be to the Scuth affecting -only the commercial lot bordering ADDRESS 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2, Coeur d'Alene, ID ZIP CODE 83814 • ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF $30.00 PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY '� %S - REQUEST WILL NOT BE REVIEWED WITHOUT FUNDS- . ) - - f Approved Approved 1v /conditions Not Approved ( ) ( ) ( Approved Approved w /conditions Not Approved ( ) ( ) ( Approved Approved w /conditions Not proved ) ( ) ( SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S DETERMINATION: •;proved w/ao conditions Approved as recommended above - Not Appro ed ( ) STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGN DEVIATION • Project Manager REcomns;n9 DC't,te.. - nits is No qD /A ecovr - TAN Frit- C: npulaem 'rt; IM& 64CY vathu.A ikecsss Ana Sn4vsPt.euroolo eDeaA CM41..4/ 36 ADvegsa r4fFr- ((c i+•E phAv IS -0o` 3N8v4 ORuPt✓ tom ribs Aaadi REcO.r YEAffs) , ?}Rio awn /pica -SoSP s fIQE A Leta 441iPRcpkio4rety c J' w 7 AmeneAoC3 eF 1 PR,vr1it OE✓EtalMien /KSa an' ,PA Ot tv s r s zvS emn04Qo Pee A++ 4eia 9`. (.4- r✓ NAvE A4T 4, o aeoc> even w1 7/4 OEvrr.r)Ynnewr C AN.r6Ll} ToJ U Fee N�a. cE n1/a/6 Asa PostS y � w K a Planning & Traffic Engineer Date l —z4 -5S L' owt - "-& -Ail D Srsi Srm.0 Aar, 4rspeep 1.4'rr pen 5r OG— SnFGE-Y i 4 Project Management Engineer Date 1/2946— Date Y /1s— Date "• - t :•4 O4 .r mate- - 3 -vg . -) S -r3----,_ # ' '-7.6 -- -- tZ r.,� c-� - J ' — a n / t I i -z0_ Ar? /ri-r 7 /fl 7?��i^. -�f ,ate ;et 1s >.�/ �i�T I ooraved Approved wlconditions Not Approved ] P--zexgr ) ( ) ( ->e) , e Operations Engineer Date 2 -2 l5 Spokane Countytngineer Date b 311 .ca (.71 lit I 1 (3) ui cz ti 1 111 - il —1 ;) 0 6 z • k xi Ft+ • 2 5 '2. f 1 I b. th 3›- ti H 36 20' 15.5 (1 I1 . I 1.1 1 7 1 _, ---r --- .---- (1) 1.- - 11 z - . EE ROAD (SEE 51 I , ;:r obi U.0 O3 *D tJ . 11 k..-[ yl I. ill lit 11 t 141 z z k.14 .6 im 8 1 ' ) i-1 E rtl Lin z ,L" t X / 70 ( 6 z z ,u 0 6 0 0 (EXI5T1t163) FINIStIED (2025 0) (2021.4) (2021N 2026 (2025.6 2026 ( 2026 (202q .0 2021 (202q .5) 2021 (2030 202-f (2030 2025,31 (EXISTINs) FINIsi IED 1 DATE 12/1/94 ROAD NAME Mission Avenue CRWRID# NANDEOFPLAT Riverwalk First Addition Platt P1414/9 ADDRESS OF BLDG NAME OF BLDG PROJECT BLDG# B9 S T R FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT # PROJECT LIMITS ROAD WIDTH ROAD SURFACE AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count PROJECTDESCRIPTION Urban Housing,Development ..... PROPOSED DESIGNDEVIATION Design deviation from the typical street section provided brth We propose a deviation from the slope of 5:1 :from the back Of curb to the flOwline to 10:1 to the future acquisition area then continuing at a 5:1 to the flow line. JUSTIFICATION: Changing the slope to a 10:1 to the future acquisition will decrease the vertical drop to the flow rine thecUrbby 1.V Providing separ between the future and the 208 treatment area: The adequate snow and storm storage along with 208 treatment w111 beMaintained without the unnecessary vertical drop. REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION $30.00 EXISTING CONDITIONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: 56' Pavement 600 Vehicles/day SUBWITEDBY North Idaho Engineering, Inc. DATE 12/9/94 ADDRESS 4206Seface Way, EUite 2, Coeur d'Alene, ID ZIPCODE 83814 PHONE # (208) 667-11 71 ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF $30.00 PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY ******* -REQUEST WILL NOT BE REVIEWED WITHOUT FUNDS- CASH/CHECK # RECEIVED BY DATE /2- / 3 - 9 V Wisidesign.det/93 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Approved Approved w /conditions O ( ) Approved Approved w /conditions ( ) ( ) 8/93 • SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S DETERMINATION: - — -. - Not Approved ( ) Not Approved ( ) Approved Approved w /conditions — - Not Approved - ( )_. ( ) Approved Approved w /conditions Not Approved DESIGN DEVIATION . Project Manager - Planning & Traffic Engineer -- Date Date Project Management Engineer Date ( ) - Operations Engineer - ` °' .. Date Approved w/no conditions t - -- Approved as recommended above -- Not Approved -- — __ _.. _ _—. ---- _ • ° . r. Spokane County Engineer Date ROAD NAME Barker Road NAME OF PLAT Riverwalk First Addition ROAD WIDTH ROAD SURFACE AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC future acquisition area then continuing at a 5:1 to the flow line. without the unnecessary vertical drop. SUBMITTED BY North Idaho Engineering, Inca DAL 12/9/94 PHONE # (208) 667-1171 REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION $30.00 Pavement *° ! ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF $30.00 PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY .. -_ -_ . ... - REQUEST WILL NOT BE REVIEWED WITHOUT FUNDS- ... ...- CASH/CHECK _ # RECEIVED BY - k\pUWesign.der8N3 • 12r1794 DATE CRP/RID # plat # P1414/9- ADDRESS OF BLDG NAME OF BLDG PROJECT BLDG# B9 S _ T _ R _ FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT # : PROJECT LIMITS _ EXISTING CONDITIONS: _ -. - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: 70' 3,000 Vehicles /day Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count PROJECT DESCRIPTION Urban Housing Development PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION Design - deviation from the typical street section provided by the office of Spokane County Engineers. We propose a - deviation from the slope of 5:1 Prom the back of curb to the flow line to 10:1 to the -- JUSTIFICATION: Changing the slope to a 10:1 to the future acquisition will decrease the vertical drop - to file flow line from the eurb by 1. 3 while providing separation between the future acqui sition' and the 208 treatment area: The adequate snow and storm storage along with 208 treatment will be maintained ADDRESS 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 Coeur d'Alene, ID` ZIP CODE 83814' DAT / T STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Approved Approved w /conditions �.) ( ) Not Approved ) • Approved Approved w /conditions Not Approved ( ) ( ) Approved Approved w /conditions - Not Approved ( )- 8N3 ( ) . ( ) -. Approved Approved w /conditions ) ( ) SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S DETERMINATION: (_.)...• .. ( ) Not Approved ) • DESIGN DEVIATION Project Manager Date Planning & Traffic Engineer - Date Project Management Engineer Date Operations Engineer Approved w /no conditions ' -- Approved as recommended above — Not Approved' - - -. Spokane County Engineer Date Date NAME OF PLAT Riverwalk First Addition ROAD WIDTH ROAD SURFACE AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC Current Traffic Count PROJECT DESCRIPTION Urban Housing Development contain an" entrance to the South.' PHONE # ( 667 -1171 SUBMITTED BY North Idaho Engineering, Inc. ADDRESS 4200 . Seltice Way, Suite 2, Coeur d'Alene, REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION $30.00 DATE 12/7/94 Pavement 2,000 /Day + Design Year Traffic Count Indiana Avenue Villa = "Avenue):Pioposed addition of a'medfan which will" DATE 12/9/94 *. *s!_ ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF $30.00 PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY **ass* ROAD NAME Indiana Avenue (Villa Avenue) CRP/RID # Plat # P14144 ADDRESS OF BLDG . NAME OF BLDG PROJECT BLDG# B9 S _ T _ R _ FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT # PROJECT LIMITS _EXISTING CONDITIONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: 40 PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION Des ign d at intersection of Barker Road and JUSTIFICATION: Addition of the median will not result in any change to the road alignment. ft will however widen (Villa Avenue) by 20' at the intersectieaof Barker Road. The 60' width will continue along Indiana Avenue (Villa Avenue)' East for 45' and then taper back to "the original 40' road width. All widening to the road will be to the South affecting only the commercial lot bordering ZIP CODE 83814' - REQUEST WILL NOT BE REVIEWED WITHOUT FUNDS- : ......e • ,. •Yi.. r • ..!.. CASH/CHECK _ # RECEIVED BY DATE /- —1 -`-'•' k\$ icsip.der8/93 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Approved Approved w /conditions ). ( ) Not Approved ) Approved Approved w /conditions Not Approved ) ( ) Approved Approved w /conditions Not Approved �..) ( ) _. • -: . Approved Approved w /conditions ) ( ) SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S DETERMINATION: - -- - Approved w /no conditions ' - -Approved as recommended above - Not Approved • 8N3 Not Approved ) DESIGN DEVIATION Project Manager Date Planning & Traffic Engineer= -'- - Date Project Management Engineer Date Operations Engineer Date • Spokane County Engineer Date w' -- -- VARIABLE (25 MAX) r EXISTING GENTEfL' INE III EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY pR0_IEST BOUNDARY RI&HT OF NAY • 10' 2 TYPE 'B' CURE. \� 51DT�7ALk 150' -5' AC &1ISITION AREA NEW R1 OF NAY LINE FOR BARKER ROAD EXISTING R16fT OE HAY EXISTING CENTERLINE OF BARKER ROAD —5' DETAIL:_ SCALE- I INCH = 50 FEET CURVE DATA FOR TOP FACE OF CURS CURVE 20.00' 3!. 20.00' 31. 02 90 °OI'52 81°58 Iq.9G' RADIUS LENSTH TANGENT 20.01' DELTA 20' 2% EXISTING CENTERLINE Or INDIANA / 20' SECTION A -A NOT TO SGAI.W SEE DETAIL B FOR RET,AININS HALL (SEE RIFif) ATOMS AND ELEVATIONS FOR CHECK DAMS SECTION S-13 NOT TO SCALE) 5•— . r 10 A/OV RIGHT OF WAY IS SIDEWALK, DRAINA5E, SLOP_. JTIL . EASEMENT, AND LANDSGAPE TRACT. 10' I MPTRES: 9-23 -95 eim r 15" GLR (TYP) I � I— �} a4 lb' 314 G 24 GOIIT. 2 a LON DFLTAIL 5 OCT TO SCALE) VLR 1 ICi T\L: 1 ( LESEND + STOP AND STREET SIGN' 8 DRYI~ELL ?E0ESTRIAN RAMP SCALE WATER 1 RET NTIDN DAM STA. TOP BERM ELEV. UPSTREAM TOE OF BERM DOWNSTREAM TOE OF ESQ.-El DAM r2A 1446.01 2025.94 1 2025.4e - I23 2,210 1 202654 2026.6.6 2025A 2 ?G 3400.00 2021.11 202669 202.6 1 11 1475.00 2076.11 1 202569 2025b5 2 +15.00 2026.91 202649 i 2026.45 L i 9 N 3.15.00 2021.11 202121 2021.25 w' -- -- VARIABLE (25 MAX) r EXISTING GENTEfL' INE III EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY pR0_IEST BOUNDARY RI&HT OF NAY • 10' 2 TYPE 'B' CURE. \� 51DT�7ALk 150' -5' AC &1ISITION AREA NEW R1 OF NAY LINE FOR BARKER ROAD EXISTING R16fT OE HAY EXISTING CENTERLINE OF BARKER ROAD —5' DETAIL:_ SCALE- I INCH = 50 FEET CURVE DATA FOR TOP FACE OF CURS CURVE 20.00' 3!. 20.00' 31. 02 90 °OI'52 81°58 Iq.9G' RADIUS LENSTH TANGENT 20.01' DELTA 20' 2% EXISTING CENTERLINE Or INDIANA / 20' SECTION A -A NOT TO SGAI.W SEE DETAIL B FOR RET,AININS HALL (SEE RIFif) ATOMS AND ELEVATIONS FOR CHECK DAMS SECTION S-13 NOT TO SCALE) 5•— . r 10 A/OV RIGHT OF WAY IS SIDEWALK, DRAINA5E, SLOP_. JTIL . EASEMENT, AND LANDSGAPE TRACT. 10' I MPTRES: 9-23 -95 eim r 15" GLR (TYP) I � I— �} a4 lb' 314 G 24 GOIIT. 2 a LON DFLTAIL 5 OCT TO SCALE) VLR 1 ICi T\L: 1 ( LESEND + STOP AND STREET SIGN' 8 DRYI~ELL ?E0ESTRIAN RAMP SCALE WATER 1 RET NTIDN DAM NEW RIGHT OF NAY LINE FOR DARKER ROAD \ ACCELERATI RAMP EDGE OF PAVEMENT ANA AVENUE. ER ROAD RKER ROAD TM4+ffST 1/4 725N, R45 W +0000) 1 EXISTI NS 5 - INS RIGHT OF \WAY R 0 4L 5 FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA • DECELERATI RAMP +00 Walla a e thra.lblieSNOWIR-- A11 1 • a h II A 0 FV. 2025.15 m m ON CV dJ 13' 2 L3 0 R 3+0000 ne GRA55Y SWALE •' SIDE OF INDIANA ONLY A 20 2'1'23'04• T = V87 R1 /1500' L = 366134 E.G.R- 14 +64. EsARKER ROAD ! T.F.C. 2021.20 ` \ M.G.R rr.FC. 2021.02 L= 91.45' / 5TR> =ET Ahm / sr� 13.0.R. 0 +56.52 / TF.G. 202684 — 0+64.01 r—� A IFG. 2026$4 L=31.41� M.C.R. T.F.C. 20271.6 O.L.P. 18+64.01 BARKER ROAD TF.C. 202152 \E.G.R 0+56.46 6' SIDEWALK II-21.49 GFJTER POINT INV. ELEV. 2025.75 TYPE 2 CURB INLET SPOKANE COUNTY ST Mc ARP TYPE 'B' DRYInr 1 WI TN I i Pt 4 PCCTAL FRAME Alit) & STA. 0+56.48 GRATE ELEV. 202645 CN`CE7 B' RI6Fff O OIRB/ 25' SIDEWALK, DRFt1N / AGE, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYF) 2A 2+00 SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD / TYPE 'A' DRYKELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME AND &RATE STA, 1 +I6.00 &RATE ELEV, 2025136 Orrf 25' LEFT f SEE DETAIL A, FOR MEDIAN (5C RJSHT) 2 +00.00 CENTER POINT INV, ELEV. 20221 TYPE 2 CURB INLET 2+65.00 CENTER PONY INV. ELEV. 2026.11 111-t 2 CURS INLET SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B' DRYI ELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME AND GRATE STA, 1+1600 &RATE ELEV, 202566 OFFSET 8' RI6Ni OF CAJRE 5 +00 PROJECT BOUNDARY VARIANCE APPROVED CONCERNING IRREGULAR RIGHT OF WAY 2+25 00 CENTER POINT INV, ELEV. 2026.41 Tree 2 CURB INLET PG =2 +11.47 4400 2L RISHT OF At PROJECT SOUHpARY 3 +25.00 CENTER. POINT INV. ELEV. 202127 TI rE 2 CURB INLET 6' SIDEWALK 15' SIDEWALK PRAINAGE SLOPE UTILITY, EASEMENT, AND LANDSCAPED 1 KAGT. (SEC LANDSCAPE PLAN BY THE BERSER FARTNERSHIP, F.SJ SCALE: 1: INCH = 50 FEET SEG. 8, T25N, R45E, H.M. r CURVE GI VARIP (25' r 50' .r..,_ 50 � 1 CURVE RAO 20 .0 1 1 1 (9NIICIX ) (0'9ZOZ) CORGINIA (17 L ZOZ ) . . N .m N O s O N di p 2026.3`! (2021.o) 202611 (2021.1) (S' bZOZ) LI'ZOZ {O'OCOZ) LS'LZOZ (O'OGOZ) Lb'LZOZ 2028.31 (EXISTINS) Q3ti51NId NEW RIGHT OF NAY LINE FOR DARKER ROAD \ ACCELERATI RAMP EDGE OF PAVEMENT ANA AVENUE. ER ROAD RKER ROAD TM4+ffST 1/4 725N, R45 W +0000) 1 EXISTI NS 5 - INS RIGHT OF \WAY R 0 4L 5 FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA • DECELERATI RAMP +00 Walla a e thra.lblieSNOWIR-- A11 1 • a h II A 0 FV. 2025.15 m m ON CV dJ 13' 2 L3 0 R 3+0000 ne GRA55Y SWALE •' SIDE OF INDIANA ONLY A 20 2'1'23'04• T = V87 R1 /1500' L = 366134 E.G.R- 14 +64. EsARKER ROAD ! T.F.C. 2021.20 ` \ M.G.R rr.FC. 2021.02 L= 91.45' / 5TR> =ET Ahm / sr� 13.0.R. 0 +56.52 / TF.G. 202684 — 0+64.01 r—� A IFG. 2026$4 L=31.41� M.C.R. T.F.C. 20271.6 O.L.P. 18+64.01 BARKER ROAD TF.C. 202152 \E.G.R 0+56.46 6' SIDEWALK II-21.49 GFJTER POINT INV. ELEV. 2025.75 TYPE 2 CURB INLET SPOKANE COUNTY ST Mc ARP TYPE 'B' DRYInr 1 WI TN I i Pt 4 PCCTAL FRAME Alit) & STA. 0+56.48 GRATE ELEV. 202645 CN`CE7 B' RI6Fff O OIRB/ 25' SIDEWALK, DRFt1N / AGE, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYF) 2A 2+00 SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD / TYPE 'A' DRYKELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME AND &RATE STA, 1 +I6.00 &RATE ELEV, 2025136 Orrf 25' LEFT f SEE DETAIL A, FOR MEDIAN (5C RJSHT) 2 +00.00 CENTER POINT INV, ELEV. 20221 TYPE 2 CURB INLET 2+65.00 CENTER PONY INV. ELEV. 2026.11 111-t 2 CURS INLET SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B' DRYI ELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME AND GRATE STA, 1+1600 &RATE ELEV, 202566 OFFSET 8' RI6Ni OF CAJRE 5 +00 PROJECT BOUNDARY VARIANCE APPROVED CONCERNING IRREGULAR RIGHT OF WAY 2+25 00 CENTER POINT INV, ELEV. 2026.41 Tree 2 CURB INLET PG =2 +11.47 4400 2L RISHT OF At PROJECT SOUHpARY 3 +25.00 CENTER. POINT INV. ELEV. 202127 TI rE 2 CURB INLET 6' SIDEWALK 15' SIDEWALK PRAINAGE SLOPE UTILITY, EASEMENT, AND LANDSCAPED 1 KAGT. (SEC LANDSCAPE PLAN BY THE BERSER FARTNERSHIP, F.SJ SCALE: 1: INCH = 50 FEET SEG. 8, T25N, R45E, H.M. r CURVE GI VARIP (25' r 50' .r..,_ 50 � 1 CURVE RAO 20 .0 North Idaho Engineering, Inc. 4200 Seldcr Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 6157.1171 ■ Fax (208) 664 -33 ass4st## # * * # # * * # ** ;7 # * * 771222222 222:311312231343 #i * # *12# # # ;s* FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL * *I4VM11/ 7172# 222232222 1117X11i#ssi: * * * * 22 #3 #i2# #231#1 #22 # /17it (X), [ ] URGENT REGARDING: PAGE, (1) OF COMPANY: ATTN: Eg Airy REF: Rhier 4AIJK G p C CR YOUR REQUEST [ ] INFORMATION [ ] REVIEW AND RESPOND [ ] OTHER, - SENT BY: 3 ca/r/es & 'nfrlf _,1?TH IDOHO ENCINEERINC 209( MESSAGE: To(' (4/7.5i t4/jon in Pest '507 DAIE SENT: di 7 /9S J.N. WaY [ ] APPROVAL [ ] CONFIDENTIAL N) U21/i& fin•+ Nutt: IF TRANSMISSION IS UNCLEAR, OR INCOMPLETE PLEASE CALL THE ABOVE LISTED TELEPHONE NUMBER AND INFORM SENDCR. FA/ (331 3 ZN JL) 7f [ ] NORMAL /TODAY P.01 N to a SECTION LINE EXIST IT IG PA VEt-IEN r t20' BARKER ROAD (snij a_ 1' 1' LEFT TURII Etc 0 1 TRAFFIC 1 30' 12' 1 45' FROM CCCTl0t1 (-It$: . 12' TRAFFIC 2% MITI. NOTES COtSTW.rTIOtl DASD:, ALONG SECTIONLINE 0.00 TO 23.35h3, FROM EXISTING it. 23435.63 TO 35463 LANE 1401l1 TRAllsITloll 10 EXISTING FROM STA. 23.35h3 TO 31.00.00 EXIS TIl to 4 . 2' BIKE LANE . . I 13 RA-1 - -5 / Io: MN P �� . BOINDARY TYPE 13" CIIR.B T/C - 130' FII)1. SI•IALE DE -- i11 = T/G - 230' ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEt -1EIIT GL 'A' 4' (MIN) & -I/2' GRLSHED SURFACING TOP 601JR5E FUTURE ACoVISITIOtl 25' OR 5L(A'E GATGI Roll(T VBllGIlL 15 SPEATER 2013 TREA1J -¢Nr,, 51101.1 ST oRACE 16' / Ty -5J-1 1 —1 mil I 1 BARKE=R ROAD (ircdc; eo) DRAINAGE, 5IDE1-IALK, SLOPE, (Irl1.I1Y EASEMEt IT MISSION AVENUE TO SPOKANE RIVER TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION - CRATE ELEVATION = ff • 05' LOCATE DRi - ELLS AS SNnI-nl 011 PLAN SI?OKANE COUNTY; Description: OA RKER. £.pAD - 'DE S,G,N Dab t4T&o Colc. by: Fitt- $EM"104Co5 Date: _I -2 -9 Checked by: Date: Notes: 0 0 Reference pl td ot r ; 7` CE t _-: 1 4 _ T CALCULATION SHEET 0 4 EMI RIO C' • A • • • 1 • Ca lculatic ia\ IIIIIII 1.11. IIIM NM n MOM II E • 1 1 EN al • 016 poi -k1 4 1'ct No.: P t - : mue¢wACK FIRST ADD, non � t of 1 OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS sak Drawn Ely. Not iP 9a DAxp e r . J.P. B /94 CNaco AA Br HORIZONTAL VERTICAL SCALE NENE NOTE BARKER ROAD (STU.) C r y TRAFFIC LEFT TURN LANE OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER W. 1025 BROADWAY AVE SPOKANE WA. 99250 456 -3500 45 I z • TRAFFIC 2X MIN BBKE LANE IQ ACP Q. •A' 4 (min) ACP CL. " JDTAL ACP OEPTH csi PER R -VALUE it]IWC APPROVED• / COON TY FNS Dat=X ¥ —9 ' SIDEWALK L R/W FUTURE ACOUI9TION 208 TREATMENT AND SNOW 'STORAGE WIDTH AS REQUIRED DRAINAGE AND SIDEWALK EASEMENT 4.I ■ 1 SIDEWALK 2S MIN 5: 5' U 0.2' MINIMUM WATER L' `� DEPTH FOR 208 ' TYPE �3' CURB 0.9' MINIMUM DEPTN FOR STORM VOLUME + -381) MAMMON WATER SURFACE .ELEVATION • 00ES NOT ENCROACH ON FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA 1DST,•FRCM RIAi TO SLDEWAUC =25.1 SPoicnc c bite. Fad". QIW •to «104+M.t6 2.%.o' DES•6AL Deinknem s.- BARKER ROAD MISSION AVENUE TO SPOKANE RIVER E.J.P TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION SHEET 1 OF 1 REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION $30.00 ,. DATE• 9/1/94; ROAD NAMEBarker Road /Indiana Ave. Intersection Gump # NAME OF PLAT Riverway Villa First Addition Plat# P1414 ADDRESS OF BLDG NAME OF BLDG PROJECT BLDG# B9 FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT # • • PROJECT LIMITS ROAD WIDTH ROAD SURFACE AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC JUSTIFICATION: (See attached) PHONE # (208) 667 -1171 EXISTING CONDITIONS: 20' East 1/2 20' West 1/2 Pavement 5600 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Urban Res ;dential Development SUBMItILD BY North Idaho Engineering, Inc. ADDRESS W. 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2, Coeur d'Alene, ID PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: 37' East 1/2 20' West 1/2 Pavement 7600 Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION Proposed intersection distance of 275' on Barker Road. DATE 9/1/94 q--11-1Y ZIP CODE 8381 4 RECEIVED ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF $30.00 PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY gyre* 1 1994 CASH/CHECK 1026 ) # SPOKANE WA 99260-0170 P ONE STIVI tIOT E REVlI D ITt OUT FUNDS- FAX ASD PO� EQ E cNT ENGINEER r,rt,th�.d« (Y � I 9 -i -9 "( STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 'M Reveal r4PPRao/Us of -l16 xis' 5PACt+, Approved Approved w /conditions (VS ( Approved Approved w /conditions O1) ( ) Approved Approved w /conditions (✓ () Approved Approved w /conditions (V) ( ) SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S DETERMINATION: 4 Approved w /no conditions Approved asreconunended above Not Approved 8/93 P/t- v/1 0 0 SL '/ Q- P( tN p'-ec, re-+4T• O teonm.144 % Not Approved ( ) Not Approved () Not Approved ( ) DESIGN`DEVIAlTON Project Manager Not Approved Planning & Traffic Engineer Date Project Manage eat En ineer Operations Engineer Spokane County Engineer Date Date Date Date 5 425 40 go 47_ /441W.u. (At jp.ead ?kb(1)1( #rWi N_XJ� a kJ tggYI .st 7 q 4 tat Yee Cher u , /ud- gist terk‘lich Afore (it'll( G X - roar 4tfr r ��/, a w [C tilt �csy tad. l l � - (tittle T X6°"!'�'/ u?(Ik' &Y !' T° _ !l�LY7G ict�, kihburo 4eSkvl Y .. PC Qf_ ma . _l_420,v3 lcntTs 4" arbh kao &kir d ,¢ "ao To: Please North Idaho €ngineerite, Inc. 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208) 664 -3507 Spokane County Encrineerinq Dept Attn: Ed Parry From: James 0. Morris Ref: Riverway Villa First Addition We are transmitting * Status * X Herewith Proposed For Information Separate Cover Preliminary As requested Via Mail In Progress Your Files Delivery Revised Your Submittal Personal Pickup Final Checking Fedex As -built X Approval UPS For Payment Your Use Other Partial Other The Following Drawings Calculations Report Letter Maps X Check $ 60.00 Plans X See at Right Call immediately Call after review X Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Reqd. Review /Comment No action Regd. TRANSMITTAL By: Date' 9/1/94 Job no. 4004 Specific Items: Design Deviation request on Barker Road - $30.00 fee. Design Deviation request on Indiana Avenue - $30.00 fee. RECEIVED sEp 0 1 1994 Message: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Please include these two deviation requests with the package submitted on 8/31/94. JUSTIFICATION: THE PROPOSED INTERSECTION OF INDIANA AVENUE WITH BARKER ROAD IS 275 FEET NORTH OF THE EXISTING INTERSECTION OF BARKER ROAD WITH BALDWIN AVENUE. THIS DISTANCE IS WITHIN 10% OF THE CURRENT DESIGN STANDARD OF 300 FEET AND WAS AN ACCEPTABLE DISTANCE WHEN THIS INTERSECTION WAS INITIALLY APPROVED AS PART OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RECORD. FURTHERMORE, THE BALDWIN AVENUE INTERSECTION IS A LOCAL ROAD WITH NO LIKELIHOOD OF EVER GENERATING A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC. THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH HAS BEEN CONTACTED ABOUT SELLING A STRIP OF LAND ON HIS SOUTH BORDER AND HAS REFUSED TO SELL HIS LAND IN ORDER TO ALLOW FOR A 300 FOOT INTERSECTION DISTANCE. WE FEEL THAT THE INSIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC CONTRIBUTION OF BALDWIN AVENUE AND THE FACT THAT THE DISTANCE IS WITHIN 10% OF THE CURRENT INTERSECTION REQUIREMENTS IS JUSTIFICATION FOR THIS VARIANCE. RECEIVED SEP 0 1 1984 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 833NION3 A.I.N900 3NV)10dS frf611 0 cl3S 03A13038 • tn : 0 0 0 Om 7 4, ....) :A,. C ie I ----...) 0 - 0 0 0 0 • sn t.P Jan.% • 61.0100111,0 . N.'511 • sauor ulnum 'Z- oe o •• • OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER September 14, 1994 Michael Hunt, P.E. North Idaho Engineering, Inc. 4200 West Seltice Way, Suite 2 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverway Villa Design Deviation Approval Gentlemen: cc: project file reviewer S P O K A V E -4ltri S9 C O U N T p A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director [ am enclosing a copy of the approved design deviation for the Indiana intersection spacing along Barker Road, and a copy of the approved design deviation for the substandard right -of -way along Indiana within the plat. These items will be considered in the current review of the plans for this project. If you have any questions, please contact me at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P. E. Spokane County Engineer Y Edward J`. Phrzy; Jr., P.E. Plans Review Engineer encls: as 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 ROAD NAME Indiana Avenue REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION $30.00 9/1 /940 • ' , • • CRP/RID' #.` NAME OF PLAT Riverway Villa First Addition Plat # P1 41 4 ADDRESS OF BLDG NAME OF BLDG PROJECT BLDG# B9 _ _ _ _ S _ T _ R FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT # • PROJECT LIMITS ROAD WIDTH ROAD SURFACE AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC PROJECT DESCRIPTION Urban Housing Development PHONE # e08) 667 -1171 EXISTING CONDITIONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: 40' Pavement 2000 Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION Non standard Right -of -Way at a point approximately 400' 'East of the proposed intersection of'Barker Road and Indiana Avenue. See enlargement on Final Plat of Riverway Villa First Addition. JUSTIFICATION: The + 3.5' deviation from the standard Right -of -Way design will not interfere with the installation and maintenance of the road improvements and sidewalk of the proposed Indiana Avenue, nor will it affect the public safety of those using this proposed road. The owner of the land that encroaches on the standard Right -of -Way width is not willing to sell property to correct this encroachment. We feel that this deviation is justified with the fact that the Riverway Villa Project will provide regional services that would otherwise remain unavailable and is in the areas best interest, that the deviation will not interfere with public safety, and that the deviation can be corrected upon the platting of the encroaching property. SUBMITTED BY North Idaho Engineering, Inc. DATE 9/1/94 ADDRESS W. 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2, Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 ZIP CODE RECEIVED ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF $30.00 PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY "p.4 1 1994 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260 -0 70 PHONE (509)326 -3600 FAX (509)324 -3478 'li � 1q1 - REOUFST W�t�, T Bc iL eD wr txouT FUNDS- SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER CASH/CHECK _ #RECEIVED BY / t / DA7 E C/ � � = �j ‘1 k1p tUtagu de• JAJ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 26connmemo 4PPKcuot1.. (ReveSA.L DES "0T A?fe*c -0 Approved Approved w /conditions Approved Approved w /conditions A ved Approved w /conditions ( V) ( ) Approved Approved w /conditions SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S DETERMINATION: 4 Approved w /no conditions 8N3 ans ag n etz s t SAFE oPfNCIto*t of -traffic-. Not Approved ( ) •-- . . 9. Project Manager Date A c9 Az) cV - t ATE Fo't ca--d�t o,✓r. Not Approved ( ) q -t -94 Planning & Traffic Engineer Date b eennend A )fl(— uirrtl i 5 ,nd e7.n./ Side n //i is roe - Coro ntle- ' Not Approved ( ) Not Approved ( ) Approved as recommended above ( ) DESIGN DEVIATION Project Managem t Engineer Date Operations Engineer Spokane County Engineer Date Date M CO m L7 x w w w w x u x W O a x r a ' FWD.ELl Era.DAQY 0f 2 coI5wwIILI is L F, DEccQAr.i N fv K HALL ?'CAr1-OM1FNY LIIE U E TOP OF HNLL a&V.20 00 D]MfIN6 G atD REIMR FLACe y , Ial, N' 04 1 I. ...� C.PPI3 AND GLITTER PEGORATIVE BLOCK WALL ra' of fGAIDA ELEV.20fl33 J 2sd• f r� REGARDING: SENT BY: MESSAGE: NOTE: ' . IDAHO ENGINEERING 290A643507 North Idaho Engineering, Inc. 4200 SelUce Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -]171 • Fax (208) 664 -3507 + 11 33 *# t***#:E 3- t3: t3S 3*: k#3;4:I* 33: 2233* 33 3i:r2331 #* * *3:23233:t321 #:t3*** FACSIMILE TRANSMIITTAL 41* *23333 #3:8:2 :2: #:k:2 #.2 # #3:E 1 :83:;32: #:2 *Y:t:F1:t34**3:; :;3333:2:2:212:2 :2.111:;:; 344:; PAGE: (1) OF DATE SENT: COMPANY : _C - t -71SCik Ox ATTN: Mo. W� WV-.S2- WV-.S2- ,T REF: 1 ? �� A V �1P� `r V '►Jl�.1C [X]: [ ] URGENT [ ] REVIEW AND RESPOND [ ] NORMAL /TODAY [ PER YOUR REQUEST [ ] APPROVAL [ ] CONFIDENTIAL [ ] INFORMATION [ ] OTHER: \C�> \D ''•L \N - C1c a lAW1, MaiN \ \1/4),■ *n IF TRANSMISSION IS UNCLEAR, OR INCOMPLETE PLEASE CALL THE ABOVE LISTED TELEPHONE NUMBER AND INFORM SENDER. P.01 f56l 1 d3S • 11p a 0 0 u • sauar ua4N. r O aL 0 0 u u 0 0 a k k 0 r r 0, z 0 c) o S 11 C o � NCN co r- m m n �` mm $ 0 D D -Z �2 m o m cr co y Z rn N _ Z 0 W LO Norte . .d.aho Engineerilk , Inc. 4200 SeRice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho' 83814' • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208) 664 - 3507 To: Spokane County Enaineerinq Dept. TRANSMITTAL Date: 9/1/94 Attn: Ed Parry From: James 0. Morris Ref: Riverway Villa First Addition We are transmitting *Status* Job no. 4004 X Herewith Proposed For Information Separate Cover Preliminary As requested Via Mail In Progress Your Files Delivery Revised Your Submittal Personal Pickup Final Checking Fedex As -built X Approval UPS For Payment Your Use Other Partial Other The Following Specific Items: Drawings Design Deviation request on Barker Calculations Road - $30.00 fee. Report Design Deviation request on Indiana Letter Avenue - $30.00 fee. Maps X Check $ 60.00 RECEIVED Plans X See at Right SE? 0 1 1994 Please Message: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Call immediately Please include these two deviation Call after review requests with the package submitted X Call, if questions on 8/31/94. Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Regd. Review /Comment No action Reqd. September 14, 1994 Michael Hunt, P.E. North Idaho Engineering, Inc. 4200 West Seltice Way, Suite 2 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverway Villa Design Deviation Approval Gentlemen: OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director I am enclosing a copy of the approved design deviation for the Indiana intersection spacing along Barker Road and a copy of the approved design deviation for the substandard right -of -way along Indiana within the plat. These items will be considered in the current review of the plans for this project. If you have any questions, please contact me at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P. E. Spokane County Engineer i Edwar P ' Jr., P.E. Plans Review Engineer encls: as cc: project file reviewer 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 REQUEST FOR DESIGN DE.VIATII�i All Neighbor. Access Streets within ROAD NAME FinalDevelopment Plan of Riverway March 30, 1983 Villa -- UATE (originally submitted_ March 11,1983)RP /RID /PLAT /L. C. N PE 1414 -8 ZE -92 -81 FEDERAL /STATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT TITLE Riverway Villa _Final__Development Attached EXISTING CONDITIONS: ROAD WIDTH ROAD SURFACE AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC None None None Current PROJECT DESCRIPTION See attached Final Development Plan frn PROJECT LIMITS See PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT: 36 feet 2 asphalt on crushed rock Unknown Design Year DESCRIPTION OF STANDARD INVOLVED Spokane County Roadway Section No. 2, Access Standard. Standard requires 36 ft. paved travelway with concrete curbs on a 50 foot right of way PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION 36 foot paved travelway with Type "C" asphalt curbs on a 50 foot r /w, no sidewalks; semi ar to po ane ounty 'oa.way ec ion !o. , £ccess Standard. See attached cross section for detailed description of proposal. JUSTIFICATION Neighborhood Access Streets using Roadway Section No. 3 can be installed with a considerable savings over the cost of installing Roadway Section No. 2 with no loss of utility. Submitted By Richard Mason on behalf of H &E Investment Date y303 STAFF FtECOMMENDA'f I uNS �1 JS �5 i�� IU�J J�ErJ` A SPNALT . CURJ /.N CoN __CU&far..CoAICRETC .CU. ag...1.s 1= . ./N - PM eS.E__L1�b'/J/� DIALS .3EC4 tS -_9!v SrR KI _ LS_Ir\SR� ' _ iDia E.VACE -Aro_ ._L QY _ JMd'JSOYE. rsEN:tf,_J.1 C 4 AS. _Ho:M.E 3 - ErAMG J .LRn'DSustl L•.C 1911_ 1= v_CLh1fr J - r l @ L (A_LL'�__i1u IA. c�ersE� T0_ TNT_ DEN _ - 0 -1E-sg _ A��D °T$*E& &'S A .E'/A/\( i CE ccA(Sa om -, Q Approved Not Approved Rte....r� am THIS 4-fa o‘ toe,- #6 / ect n Engineer Date 3_3i —(73 L� t - __63.4 C ST -._ r P�zYE..P_<L.<_tC _teat,- Approved Not Approved Approved u Not Approved De Co -) rr Pr Foe /ZaAQc 4d . - annu P 3 i Pa e. 00147 rY _ Cup pac vc,C 1 cPenFx/Tt 4 - v Nor EveFX &" Hrc� Litiu -ir y Pu pc m:1,-16% v 7T Re crr ,. o,.n sry pset—j r „ass B F 2 mri r 7 Approved Not Approved Approved Not Approved C T afflc Engin i ���1 1�3 ivision Enginee to Ltd e_ 4.9k _ Ybl [N_.trP- unty Engineer Date Date„ MIIJIMUM arase GSOLACIGLIHHTO TYPE W A CP. 11 ICW1e•9 2M/ WIOTI OMlaO WALK AcCGOP DG 2" 60 DO ==1 1 . 1 .'s'••••• 7 ACPHALT CUUCoere CLft. Type "C'. 18' 50' Right -Of -Way 36' 1 L9ow:“.1 CCM.caarE n.IGMP_LIr. ace 1.rTp • IJUT TL SCALE 18' QUA D`LGY SECTIUIJ NU. 3 TYPICALLY DECIU1OEO FOCI SL*UQtAIJ QESIOEU1IAL liTJSTG{.iL - RIVERWAY VILLA Proposed Standard for Access Streets 7 CQIl911E0 CRILD5AGi,JO 1L0 CUUa.E CQU9NC0 °URFA:r aa3 CALse Cc uESE, oerE011tuao [I! TOAFY -IC A.140 EULS NOTES... • POOTl.auq CeMGNr CCIKOLTE PAVe■aJT MN( DE ins!, W4W APPODveD b( 1110 CWUTY e4DIUe eD. T4I0N14e59 SHALL_ on DErery.114eo tr( TUAFPIC LOADS AA10 aul_ vALUCS. pOAD W Th C%'PICE oP CUUIJTY EIJGIIJEE 9P0AA1JE CU yc 9H G IJ AfDoUOVEO. ' ` �!fU . O.PU\A UN F_ Ale COTY AGIIJrEQ DATE.... .. . T' ......... . SHEET 9- 3 em.Jo ao Two design deviations are being requested. Deviation #1 is for narrower R.O.W. width on Indiana. The narrower R.O.W. width would allow the grassy swale to be on private property. All other portions of the typical cross section are as required, except the sod and sidewalks would be installed with the adjacent property. The narrower R.O.W. was used in Homestead and allows the swale to be on private property so it can be maintained by the Homeowners' Association. I recommend Deviation 011 be approved. Deviation #2 is for thickened edge asphalt curb in lieu of concrete curb. Concrete curb is used at these urban densities because on- street parking 1s more prevalent and lot improvements such as homes, garages, landscaping and fencing are typically located much closer to the street than suburban den- sities. Therefore, due to these factors and the corresponding maintenance considerations, I recommend that Deviation #2 not be approved. MINIMUM roar GSGUIfSMSWTS TYPE W A.CP. TNICMYS•B C/ WIOTN Prwal3 WAS Acceee DG 1" 50 MG _ — 7' u �.� /.OaY.LT CrA-alert Milk. TYPO 18' 50' Right -Of - Way 36' 4- 18' QOADWSY SECTION NO. 'b TYPICALLY CIEOILDED POa BLIEUUCAN + GESIOEIJTIAL II IJu9TGL1L RIVERWAY VILLA Proposed Standard for Access Streets NOT TO SCALE 7' COUSItD BUOPI:CIIXi TLP COUa9E COUONeo OUPPacIwn Case CLUOSE, 06rEUMIN60 by TPAFFIC AND 9GILS NOTES.. PGIITLAun Ce'4enT COIJCOEre P SVe,AMNT NaY p! UflO Wwe4 APPGLiV eD . RN CGUUfY e uGlNeeO. nNICNluees BMW- PS o ereOMwJeo SY NAPIIC LcAOS 4/O BUL VALIJGt 7 .. "Mr. 7. L STANOA[ip O WAYY OFPICE Ur COUNTY EIJGIN6 SPCMAI3E COM SHp.4GIL(u v APPaoEO. t .,u>)U J MANE CCAJ./r- EI- GINCHa OPC / DATE I-T'Ol sHEEr 9- 5 r Cross - Section Looking East ® Travelway and Curb Details same as Spokane County Roadway Section No. 2, Collector Standard ® Landscape, Drainage, Utility, Traffic Control''Device and Sidewalk Easement. On the south side of the right -of -way the drainage swale, landscaping, sidewalks, turf, and drainage structures shall be installed concurrent with the improvement of adjacent travelway. On the north side of the right -of -way the drainage swale shall be sloped and drainage structures installed concurrent with improvement of adjacent travelway. Turf, landscaping, and sidewalks will be installed con- current with development of land to the north. O Concrete Sidewalk INDIANA AVENUE COLLECTOR STANDARD Proposed Final Cross - Section R /VERWAY VILLA / FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT TITLE Riv9rwav Villa li --- attached REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION • ROAD NAME Indiana Avenue (Vriginally'submitted March 11, 1883) DATE March 30, 1483 CRp/R]0/YLAT/%,C. No. 7E~92-81 PROJECT DESCRIPTION See attached preliminary plat --__' ''---`---'_'_'' — '� - '----_--- � . PROJECT LIMITS See ------- EXISTING 0/N|/I7ioN6: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT: ROAD WIDTH None 40 feet ROAD SURFACE -NOne P on crushed rock 8xc, DAILY TRAFFIC None . unknown , \\ Current Design Year DESCRIPTION OF STANDARD INVOLVED Spokane County Roadway Section NV. 2, Collector- , Standard. Standard requires 40 ft. travelway with concrete curbs --- 6' wide sidewalks on each side; all on 60 feet r/w PROPOSED U[slGN DEVIATION 40 ft. travelway with concrete curbs on 44 ft. r/w% '208' drainage swales and landsc (trees) adjacent bs and 6' sidewalks outside drainage swales. See attached cross sectiVn f0r detail and explanation of proposed time of installation of north and south improvements. JUSTIFICATION Narrower right of way with adjacent drainage swales will eliminate need for special curb i ss storm runoff underneath sidewalk. Drainage easements will be on private property with turf and landscaping (trees) maintained by Homeowners Association. Sidewalk will be set back from curb for safer pedestrian travel. Trees will create visually pleasing travelway environment. e S u By Submitted D Richard Mason on behalf of H&E Investments � ---------- Dace STAFF RECoMMENDATII)Nr• TM IS _ .1 EQ.& k _ AAR K.0 1/1E/ Vs//P , 0 ,/K.O.//4 A/ 4o. NA ;KAQ ,([ Rad xe ,/, . CrkieSK 3W4 ;82 ALL o .P_o .fcr) . _o .7TX.19 /_ Cr A:R.E., As REQUIRE() . ..EACC:?pr: Afokr kivooLo /N37ifun LED_ _wm tH fliMCn7 DEvEcoPI,4 EAT7; R a ca A P A Approved Not Approved LO' 1111 Approved Not Approved Approved' Not Approved " 111 Approved Not Approved Approv •d Not Approved [1 P a-/- 4 - 2 - 4 -Sen-e te St Gin/ / i'lLo 9osel) oev 6-TF Traffic Engi xL j 0 \ - Do\ peck ct Engineer aat e ? fice Engineer f3c niEitsLfl _ LA:k.c.c-u.t2e" _gst-irp_ti__6 ft-A- P/ A ° k• 5 Ta-i 1 "PA& of /3 ffin-YLidc-C SY 5 Ter.-) 0 77-fre ,LTrt 370e at= Th42 _51n43er_te_s eirir etr r14-e p.049 r_ ,/ n77.4as . e e±ii_4Q._ nic , Divis ion Enginee Dat Date ( 5 Cross - Section Looking East O Travelway and Curb Details same as Spokane County Roadway Section No 2, Collector Standard ® Landscape, Drainage,'Utility, Traffic Control`Device and Sidewalk Easement. On the south side of the right - of-way the drainage swale, landscaping, sidewalks, turf, and drainage structures shall be installed concurrent with the improvement of adjacent travelway. On the north side of the right -of -way the drainage swale shall be sloped and drainage structures installed concurrent with improvement of adjacent travelway. Turf; landscaping, and sidewalks will be installed con- current with development of land to the north. O Concrete Sidewalk INDIANA AVENUE COLLECTOR'STANDARD Proposed Final Cross-Section RIVERWAY .VILLA May 17, 1994 Derald E. Martin, President Welco Group Inc. P.O. Box 2825 Redmond, WA 98073 -2825 RE: Riverway Villa Planned Unit Development Design Dear Mr. Martin: I met with Mike Hunt of North Idaho Engineering on May 17, 1994 to review the final plat of Riverway Villa First Addition and the overall Planned Unit Development design for the entire project. I am still waiting for a response from the Spokane County Engineer's Office for comments on the PUD design. 1 discovered that a copy of the preliminary PUD design was not circulated to Dick Fankhauser of the Washington State Parks Commission . I have discussed the design with Mr. Fankhauser and am waiting for his official comments which should be sent shortly. The following is a summary of my initial review for required design changes to your final plat of Riverway Villa, First Additio, for compliance with Conditions of Approval and current Zoning and Subdivision regulations: Final Plat of Riverway Villa, First Addition: • Submittal of Count Assessor parcel maps, 1:200 & 1:400, outlining the final plat area and stamped by a land surveyor licensed in the State of Washington. • Copy of an approved water plan. • Removal of the vicinity map from the fmal plat. • Letters of easement acceptance from local utility purveyors; water, power, gas, and phone. • Detailed landscape and fence plan with estimate and promissory letter for installation. Landscaping is required along Villa Lane within open space tracts maintained by the Homeowners Association. • Addresses drafted on final plat. • The County Engineer will require one foot strips at the terminus of all public rights -of- way. • Front and Flanking yard setbacks should be shown as approved with the approved Final PUD. • All property ownership interests need a signature block and notary statement. All notary stamps should be in black ink. • The legal description includes all of the site ownership. The plat certificate should be modified to reflect the portion of the site being platted. The lot and block designation for the remaining tract should be removed and changed to "unplatted ". • There is an easement and building encroachment disclosed in the Plat Certificate which should be addressed prior to final plat approval. • A copy of the Homeowners documents should be submitted for review. • Finalize any mitigating agreements with the Central Valley School District and Spokane County Parks Department. • Approval of traffic study by the Spokane County Engineer and Washington State Department of Transportation. • There are a number of drafting changes which are shown on a "redlined" copy of the final plat and which was given to Mr. Hunt. Each department or agency is responsible for review of your final plat. Please coordinate your efforts with each department. Mike and I also discussed the design for the entire Riverway Villa Final PUD. 1 have the following comments to offer: Final Planned Unit Development of Riverway Villa: • Remove roadway cross section design from final PUD site plan. All roadway design widths should be approved by the Spokane County Engineers office. • Eliminate pseudo-cul -de -sacs from design. • No lot line shall be within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark. It's possible the 200 foot shoreline setback may affect plat design and may affect the total number of lots. • Add a 13 foot landscape buffer on the north side of Villa Avenue. The planting strip should a separate tract owned by the Homeowners Association for maintenance. • Show fence detail and height. • The phasing schedule did not account for the commercial lot labeled as Lot 1, Block 1. • Some corner lots may restrict building footprint area due to front and flanking setback requirements. • There are some minor drafting changes shown on a "redlined" copy of the draft final PUD which was given to Mr. Hunt. The insert showing proposed building setbacks should be altered to show new setbacks for site built homes. The Planning Department recommends a front/flanking setback of no less than 20 feet. The underlying standard for rear and side yards in the Urban Residential -7 (UR -7) zone is 15 feet and 5 feet/story respectively. A 20 foot perimeter rear yard has been shown and shall be adhered to. • Language to the effect "No direct access to lots within Riverway Villa to the Washington State Centennial Trail is permitted." will be placed on every phase finalized. I suggest you contact Pat Harper of the Spokane County Engineer's office for roadway design comments. All of the Conditions of Approval for Riverway Villa listed in the Time Extension dated August 5, 1993 for Riverway Villa will be applied to your Final PUD once your Final PUD design is accepted by each department. Once again, the approved preliminary plat of Riverway Villa is located in an area no longer exempt from on site sewage regulations and any additional extensions of time granted for Riverway Villa may be conditioned on the extension of public sewer. Please coordinate any sewer plans with the Spokane County Utilities Department. The above comments are only preliminary , based on plans submitted, some additional fine tuning of the overall design may still be needed. I have been working with Mike Hunt an I am looking forward to completion of your PUD design so we can move ahead on finalization of the remaining phases. I can be reached at (509) 456 -2205 if you any questions. Sincerely, Thomas Veljic Planner H pc. Wallis Hubbard, Director Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineer Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks Mike Hunt, North Idaho Engineering PLANNING DEPARTMENT July 13, 1994 Derald E. Martin, President Welco Group Inc. P.O. Box 2825 Redmond, WA 98073 -2825 Dear Mr. Martin: RE: Riverway Villa Planned Unit Development Design C o u N T Y WALLIS D. HUBBARD, DIRECTOR In a correspondence dated June 2, 1994, the Spokane County Planning Department commented on the Final Plat of Riverway Villa 1st Addition and the preliminary design for the overall Planned Unit Development (PUD). In that letter I gave you detailed comments with required changes and additional documentation. On June 30, 1994, the Planning Department received, and circulated to other agencies, a revised drawing of both the final plat and overall PUD design. Some minor required changes were made but the majority of my comments have not been addressed. The following is a reiteration of those requirements which have not been completed. Additional comments are shown in bold. Final Plat of Riverway Villa, First Addition: Submittal of County Assessor parcel maps, 1:200 and 1:400, outlining the final plat area and stamped by a land surveyor licensed in the State of Washington. Copy of an approved water plan. Letters of easement acceptance from local utility purveyors; water, power, gas, and phone. Detailed landscape and fence plan with estimate and promissory letter for installation. Landscaping is required along Villa Lane within open space tracts maintained by the Homeowners Association. Common space along "Villa Lane" is approved as part of the south 1/2 design and is not shown. The common area is a landscaped strip and must be shown on the final plat as a separate, common area tract. A landscape plan will be required prior to finalization. All property ownership interests need a signature block and notary statement. All notary stamps should be in black ink. All ownership interests shown on the plat certificate must sign the final plat. The legal description includes all of the site ownership. The plat certificate should be modified to reflect the portion of the site being platted. An updated plat certificate is required and should be not Tess than six months old at the time of filing the final plat. • There is an easement and building encroachment disclosed in the Plat Certificate which should be addressed prior to final plat approval. • A copy of the Homeowners documents should be submitted for review. • Finalize any mitigating agreements with the Central Valley School District and Spokane County Parks Department. • Approval of traffic study by the Spokane County Engineer and Washington State Department of Transportation. • Road naming should be coordinated with the County Engineers Office. WEST 1026 BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASIiINGTON 99260 -0240 • (509) 456 -2205 Final Planned Unit Development of Riverway Villa: • No lot line shall be within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). It's possible the 200 foot shoreline setback may affect plat design and may affect the total number of lots. Show the approximate 200' shoreline area on the Final Draft of the overall PUD plan. • Add a 13 foot landscape buffer on the north side of Villa Avenue. The planting strip should a separate tract owned by the Homeowners Association for maintenance. • Show fence detail and height. The fence shown on the draft PUD site plan is inadequate to buffer "Storage Areas ". • The phasing schedule did not account for the commercial lot labeled as Lot 1, Block 1. • Some comer lots may restrict building footprint area due to front and flanking setback requirements. • There are some minor drafting changes shown on a "redlined" copy of the draft final PUD which was given to Mr. Hunt. Not all requested changes were made. North Idaho Engineering should refer to the "redline" for required changes. • Language to the effect No direct access to lots within Rivenvay Villa to the Washington State Centennial Trail is permitted." will be placed on every phase finalized. • Storage areas have not been accounted for in the text or design of the PUD. As we discussed previously, storage areas shall he fenced, landscaped, or otherwise buffered from surrounding residential uses. The four foot fence shown on the draft PUD plan is inadequate and a six foot, sight obscuring fence will be required. The "Storage Area" added to the PUD plan and shown along Barker Road is unacceptable and should be integrated within the internal portions of the plat. I know there has been some delay with review comments from the County Engineer's Office on the roadway design, traffic analysis, and sewer plans. I have mentioned to you, and past owners, that all documentation should be submitted to the lead agency. For all platting actions the Spokane County Planning Department is the lead agency and would circulate all required platting documents for review and comment. Once again, your representatives should make an appointment and submit all plat documents to Spokane County Planning to insure that the appropriate agencies receive your final plat documents and they are reviewed in a timely manner. 1 can be reached at (509) 456 -2205 if you any questions. Sincerely, (f Thomas Veljic Planner II pc. Wallis Hubbard, Director Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineer Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks Mike Hunt, North Idaho Engineering Washington'State Department of Transportation District 6 North 2714 Mayfair Street Spokane. Washington 99207 -2090 (509) 456-3000 Fax (509) 456 -3089 Mr. Tom Veljic Spokane County Planning W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 -0240 RECEIWErfil MAY 1 9 1993 SMOAIOE COMM EMGIREER May 18, 1993 iRe ki verway a ha>E Dear Mr. Veljic: In regard to the above proposed development the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) requests that the developer perform a traffic study for this development. We are requesting this traffic study due to the fact that this development will generate a substantial number of trips and the Barker Road Interchange is quite limited in the amount of additional traffic it can safely accommodate. Because of this WSDOT requests that this traffic study address in particular the impacts this development will have on the Barker Road/I -90 Interchange. Analysis of the interchange needs to include; analysis of the intersection of the I -90 ramps with Barker Road, the capacity of Barker Road over 1 -90, and the ramp merges on I -90. WSDOT requests that the following conditions be attached as conditions of approval for this development: I. A traffic analysis of the Barker Road Interchange with the following elements. A - Site Map (illustrating the complete circulation system). B - Vicinity Map(s) (illustrating traffic distribution). C - Existing Transportation Conditions. I - Existing Average Daily Traffic. 2 - Existing AM & PM Peak Hour Level of Service. 3 - Existing AM & PM Peak Hour Turning Movements. D - Projected Transportation Conditions With This Development. 1 - Projected Average Daily Traffic. 2 - Projected AM & PM Peak Hour Level of Service. 3 - Projected AM & PM Peak Hour Turning Movements. r/ci/ Duane Berentson Secretary of Transportation Mr. Veljic May 18, 1993 Page 2 E - Recommended Mitigating Measures. 1 - Mitigating Measures sufficient to maintain existing Level of Service "D ". 2 - If the existing Level of Service "D" can not be maintained a justification should be included. Note: The ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual (5th Edition) should be used as a bases to compute trip generation rates of the proposed developments. II. That the applicant agree to fund and construct the necessary mitigating measures as outlined in the above traffic study. These mitigating measures must be approved by both WSDOT and Spokane County Engineers prior to . the issuance of any building permits for this property. III. Due to the trip generation potential, any further development other than what is proposed will require further review by WSDOT to assure additional trips are safely accommodated. The developer should be aware that the above requirements only address WSDOT concerns, as Spokane County Engineers may have additional areas that will require analysis. If you should have any questions about the above comments please feel free to contact Ted Trepanier in our District Planning Office at 456 -3996. JCL TJT /gjf cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers Sincerely, J.C. LENZI District Administrator By: THEODORE J. TREPANIER, PE District Planning Engineer � Washington State VI/ Department of Transportation District 6 North 2714 Mayfair Street Spokane, Washington 99207 -2090 (509) 456-3000 Fax (509) 456 -3089 Mr. Tom Veljic Spokane County Planning W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 -0240 May 18, 1993 Re: Riverway Villa Duane Seventeen Secretary of Transportation Dear Mr. Veljic: In regard to the above proposed development the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) requests that the developer perform a traffic study for this development. We are requesting this traffic study due to the fact that this development will generate a substantial number of trips and the Barker Road Interchange is quite limited in the amount of additional traffic it can safely accommodate. Because of this WSDOT requests that this traffic study address in particular the impacts this development will have on the Barker Road/I -90 Interchange. Analysis of the interchange needs to include; analysis of the intersection of the I -90 ramps with Barker Road, the capacity of Barker Road over I -90, and the ramp merges on I -90. WSDOT requests that the following conditions be attached as conditions of approval for this development: I. A traffic analysis of the Barker Road Interchange with the following elements. A - Site Map (illustrating the complete circulation system). B - Vicinity Map(s) (illustrating traffic distribution). C - Existing Transportation Conditions. 1 - Existing Average Daily Traffic. 2 - Existing AM & PM Peak Hour Level of Service. 3 - Existing AM & PM Peak Hour Turning Movements. D - Projected Transportation Conditions With This Development. 1 - Projected Average Daily Traffic 2 - Projected AM & PM Peak Hour Level of Service. 3 - Projected AM & PM Peak Hour Turning Movements. Mr. Veljic May 18, 1993 Page 2 2 - If the existing Level of Service "D" can not be maintained a justification should be included. Note: The ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual (5th Edition) should be used as a bases to compute trip generation rates of the proposed developments. II. That the applicant agree to fund and construct the necessary mitigating measures as outlined in the above traffic study. These mitigating measures must be approved by both WSDOT and Spokane County Engineers prior to the issuance of any building permits for this property. III. Due to the trip generation potential, any further development other than what is proposed will require further review by WSDOT to assure additional trips are safely accommodated. The developer should be aware that the above requirements only address WSDOT concerns, as Spokane County Engineers may have additional areas that will require analysis. If you should have any questions about the above comments please feel free to contact Ted Trepanier in our District Planning Office at 456 -3996. JCL TJT /gjf E - Recommended Mitigating Measures. 1 - Mitigating Measures sufficient to maintain existing Level of Service "D ". cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers Sincerely, I C LENZI District Administrator By: THEODORE J. TREPANIER, PE District Planning Engineer John D. Clardy P. 0. Box 762 Deer Park, WA 99006 (509) 276 -2048 FAX (509) 276 -2313 - CAR (509)993 -2078 Spokane County Planning Department 1116 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99201 Re: River Way Villa Gentlemen: November 13, 1992 The following is an outline of our preliminary proposal for the development of 112 acres located at the northeast corner of Mission and Barker Road.' I would appreciate your thoughts and suggestions on the following proposal. I propose to short plat the property into seven lots which would be used as follows: 10 acres - Neighborhood Commercial 15 acres - School Site 10 acres - Mini Storage 4 parcels - 19.25 acres each - Multiple Family The muliiple parcels would be planned primarily for families with 80% of the units three - bedrooms and 20% two - bedrooms. The project would include 10,000 sq. ft. recreation buildings and would share the playground with the public school. The project would have its own boy and girl scout troops with a full time recreation director to provide after school and supervised recreation during the summer. Each parcel will have 178 units (seven to the acre) located in 23 two -story buildings clustered to maximize the open space. The design criteria would be to back all of the buildings onto Mission and Barker Road. There would be two accesses to the development: one from Mission and one from Barker. It is proposed that the entire infra - structure would be privately owned. The perimeter would be fenced in a decorative wood fence and landscaped with masonry entry structures. Page 2 Spokane County Planning Department November 13, 1992 The proposal includes building a sewer pumping station at the most northerly boundary of the property line and connecting it to a pressure main to transport the sewage south to the Barker Road overpass. I would propose hanging the sewer main on the overpass and the gravity would feed it to the County collector. The project will be financed with HUD under the 221,d,4 program. HUD will not finance off tract improvements such as the sewer line, traffic mitigation or impact fees. The ability to move ahead with this project will depend on the extent of off site improvements required by the County and the timing of such installations. Your views and requirements are needed so that we can evaluate our chances of proceeding. ' Thank you for your assistance. Washington State Department of Transportation District 6 North 2714 Mayfair Street Spokane. Washington 99207 -2090 (5091456 -3000 Fax (509) 456 - Mr. John D. Clardy P.O. Box 762 ' Deer Park, WA 99006 Dear Mr. Clardy: 700 Apartments @ 6.28 Trips per Unit 10 Acre Retail Site Trip Production 15 Acre Elementary School Site May 22, 1992 The Washington - State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has completed a preliminary review of the proposed development to determine what type of mitigating measures would be required. We would emphasize that this analysis was very limited in its scope and intended only to give you an idea of the magnitude of the impact generated by developing this site. A traffic study will be needed to properly identify actual impacts and appropriate mitigating measures. WSDOT estimates the following daily trips would be produced by this development. = 4,396 3,300 = 670 TOTAL TRIPS GENERATED = 8,366 Duane Berentson Secretary. of Transportation RE: Development of 112 acres at NE corner of Mission and Barker Road WSDOT analysis indicates that this volume of additional trips cannot be accommodated by the existing area roadways. To accommodate these trips we foresee the following types of improvements being required by WSDOT as mitigating measures: • Signalization of both the Westbound and Eastbound Ramps at Barker Road. • Installation of a left turn pocket on the Eastbound Barker Off Ramp • Installation of a right tum pocket on Northbound Barker Road at the Westbound On Ramp. • Mitigating measures may also be required at the intersection of Barker Road and Trent Avenue depending on the trip distribution of the site. � a ' "a? E � MAY 2 8 1992 SPOKANE tt K? ENGINEER f Mr. Clardy May 22, 1992 Page 2 • Any additional mitigating measures as required by Spokane County Engineer's Office. Again we emphasize, to determine specific mitigating measures for this development, a traffic study will need to be prepared by the developer (for WSDOT and Spokane County approval) once a detailed site plan is available. This traffic study must include the following elements: A - Site Map (illustrating the complete circulation system) B - Vicinity Map(s) (illustrating traffic distribution) C - Existing Transportation Conditions I.) Existing Average Daily Traffic 2.) Existing AM & PM Peak Hour Level of Service 3.) Existing AM & PM Peak Hour Turning Movements D - Projected Transportation Conditions With This Development 1.) Projected Average Daily Traffic 2.) Projected AM & PM Peak Hour Level of Service 3.) Projected AM & PM Peak Hour Turning Movements E - Recommended Mitigating Measures 1.) Mitigating Measures sufficient to maintain an acceptable Level of Service at all intersections 2.) If the existing Level of Service can not be maintained a justification should be included NOTE: The ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual (5th Edition) should be used as a basis to compute trip generation rates of the proposed developments. The WSDOT will ask that you fund all mitigating measures necessary to maintain acceptable Level of Service on the affected facilities. Mr. Clardy May 22, 1992 ' Page 3 JCL TJT /gf C:lwrdgleslgregs\claridy.doc If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact Ted Trepanier in our District Planning Office at (509) 456 -3996. cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers Sincerely, J.C. LENZI District Administrator By: THEODORE J. TREPANIER, P.E. District Planning Engineer JUN 06 '95 09'36AN SPOVt-DEPT OF BLDG OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINflR ly�� 1028 W. BROADWAY a SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 98280 7 PHONE (509).4584800 PERMIT TO PERFORM WORK ON COUNTY ROAD Permit W E� C114 CAMERON 06 1995 CAMERON ON CONTRACTING, INC 3309 W B SMARK AVE 99205 -740 WA 466-5555 SPOKANE The applicant hereby applies for permission to CONSTRUCT CURB AND GUTTER ON INDANA FOR RIIVERWALK PF;A.SE I ere old.` as +tataa CSa at +rous + *t**cats +oraaoaaaaa rat I *atwith *asphalt less thans5 *tearsaold.* t *No cut* on county roads t attaatatiaataa aastt aataaa +a +� art *aataaat /--&yi S te ` F' .1 Date work to start JUN UN i 1995 dd y The ®timatid time re eas to all abo gence o and i Speed witn petitioner ag the public. regardt�orpthe rQg te, ntereate an conveniences o th p Petitioner further agrees to perform the work In strict c with the provisions enumerated below and states that he this form. The has read and will adhere to undersigned guarantees that n 11 the backbit, street street surfacing i fails wthin years from o the date of final inspection by Spokane County, he shall pay tho nest of the County for making repairs or restoration the roadway and , SPOkane and any improvements. InconalderationOf the granting Of this p theapl that the Cllutyto6 nyaccident,lose any o ramag fdemployee sor prShall t n or emu aP applicant te damagetopprsonsorproperty ie i t whiehm yb result of of the terrns d ication a p tl the t ttirms tope r pp if happening permits n g hereby assumed by the aplican• It is further agreed that I any earl of this installation interferes with the iuturs use oft the highway by the general public, It must bF [eT Wed or relocated es designated by the engineer 8t thA - expense ot the permitter or his successor In interest ill 6 9S^• O y _ H = : :;;:;:HERMIT Subject to all the terms, condrtir` .cippthinekion'aYvittlen or printed below or on any part of this form, PERMISSION 18 HEREBY GRANT the above applicant to: � FILE IN COUNTYOENGINEER I TO WITH FORMSAPRIOR_T: PLAN_ ON 48 HO(_ ADVANCE_NOTICE_REQUIRED. Z APE.PD I ANAaRS E BW O EHOLr A TH —aT E T H AAN - FORARIVERWALK.+RE TRESR INA•LI � TRAE�FTC°'CO OL PER MUTCD. ALL STREET HARM ESS AND °ACCEPTS ALL"R 20NS,IS�TIL ^IrTtY BHOULD> wTHE�TNP:L GR ANY .OVEMENT OTOTBE'_STAKED_BYA LICENSED IOMPLIANCETS TH TH S ED A AN FILE IN SURVEYOR AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN ON FILE IN THE COUNTY ENGINEERS OFFI g COMPACTION 92s MAXIMUM DENSITY RUSING STANDARD SIDEWALK. COUNTY METHODS REQUIRED ST PLAENT UNDER THE NEW OR EE W CRX BE ON THE JOB SITE FOR WORK TO COMMENCE. Total _$ BILL Paid by CE ;# REIMBURSED R BILLr A fee $ 10 u ntp of 50. fee issued t CAMERON CONT INC A bond in zed mount of compliance with t above conditions said bond to be kept is q� tee eo and foep or a period of 2 years following completion of woe) �uil rQrce an in effect apt orized, by this permit. Th perm Shae1JbL void 9 unless the work herein contemplated shall have been INSPECTION REQUIRED — 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED Call Permit Office 456 - 3600 to notify when work begins and schedule inapectlon. COUNTY E NEE ' a 06/06/95 010.1M' GATE It is the ibil' :ppli f tto notify all utilities and private properly owners when auohproperty is liable to injury or protection of such prope; an utilities. Traffic contra signing and barricades shall be furnished by 17ermlttee m strict damage thr. the oar+ enrol the above work and the applicant snall make all necessary arrangements relative tot the rnntormance with Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ". Thla permit must be aysllebte on the work site and is valid JUN -14 -95 WED 05:15 Ar NLAND ASPHALT CO . n99229144 JUN 13 '95 05 SPOKANE DEPT OF BLDG P.1 OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W. BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 PHONE (609) 456.3600 PERMIT TO PERFORM WORK ON COUNTY ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY JUN 13 1995 Permit # 95 - EAB118 INLAND ASPHALT CO #64331 SP BOX 3366 SPOKANE WA 99220 534-2657 993 -0556 The applicant hereby applies for permission to CRUSHED ROCK AND ASPHALT PAVING FOR RIVERWALK PHASE I *******************************'*************** * * * * **** * * * * ** * * * * * * * - p *** * * * ** * & S HOLD SPoKKAANE RHARMLESS EPTS ° ALIrR SZONSI L E LIAL› * * SHOULD_aHE GRADE. NECESS *'* ITATE ANY CHANGES ON.TUE_ ROCK .& ASPHAL'TJ + ** * *** * * * * * ** ** *' *** * * *** * * ** ***' ***' ** * *' *Yi1, - t* t*�ek ** * * ** * ** * ***4ii*i * * * ** * ********************************* ** * * ** ** ** * * * ** ** ****** ** ** * * ** *No cuts on county roads with asphalt leas than 5 years old.* ‘/ -//).e a /` aim f /o eel 5L S , 4 0,411/;4-Zee-eZ 6P --O-a.alce-eit-22.) Coif es ..,242 e. / . 2e.ic-- . 2fri..-/ The estimated time required for completig above work is 30 days which tje petitioner agrees to prosecute with all dilegence and speed witn due regard Or the rights, interest and conveniences of t e public. Petitioner furtheragreea to perform the work in strict compliance with the provIsiono enumerated below and states that h0 to r undersigned guarantees lhatif he atr e t surf acing l cing permits provement fails e within n two years from the date of final the inspection by Spokane County, he stall pay the cost of the County for m eking reoalr tt s or restoration of t rec ewav and irnrunvnmon! to n cas tdn ....:..- _. .,.- ,.- _ • lid. p..,.v,,, la Gera -N 47 We cppricant mene uount 0751% pekan and any or aamage to p ersons or property, happening or occurring as the proximate result any of the work undert ken terrnsofthis application and the permit orpermlts which maybe granted in response thereto, and that all of said liabilities are hereby assumed by the applicant. It is further agreed that if any part of this in lotion interferes with the future use of the highway by the general pt.' i ust bNerpOY odorretocatedasd ateybit sang' atthe expense of the permlttee or his successor in a tent.,; ' ee • , . WZ •:PERMIT 1 sub,. to all the terms, conditIons: and bfc;Gleidri Written or printed below or on any f this form. PERMISSION 18 HEREBY GRANTED the above applicant to: PERFORM WORK TO COUNTY STANDARDS. APPLICANT IS AWARE THAT THE STREET PLANS FOR RIVERWALK PHASE I ARE NOT FA� AALj,IZED AND AGREES TO HOLD SPOKANE COUNTY HARML SS AND ACCEPTS ALL RESPON BILITY SHOULD THE FINAL GRADE NECESSITATE BBAC CC KF LL SHALL THE COMPACTED ASP 9 % OFITHE MAX BY COMPA SNGTON A STANDAR TEST THE R S FORROADAND D BRIDGE AS DIRECTED BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER. P ermit fee $ 10 Inspection fee $ REIMBURSED Total B LL Paid by CH # bond in the amount of $50p0p0 issued to INLAND Total T C� '.s re ire to ir� sure compliance with the above con itions, said bond to b kept in fu force an s in effect for a per of 2 ea olll completion of work 1 i t m perrni ore ofd unless the work herein contempla shall have been INSPECTION REQUIRED — 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED Call P r1 it - 3 600 to not when work begins and schedule Inspection. COUNTY E - - BY DATE 06 It is the reaponsiblllty of the app tify all utilities and private pmpeny owners when such oroperty is liable tO Injury or da mage through oug h e pe f orm a an Aeof the a bore work and the applicant are! f m ake. all nec aMsri ire,anoe-lee:a relative to E. el STAFF REPORT April 7, 1983 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF RE: CHANGE -OF- CONDITION and FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PE-1414-81, RIVERWAY VILLA ZE- 92-81, Agricultural to RMH and Commercial PUDE -1 -82, Planned Unit Development, an overlay zone I. GENERAL INFORMATION Sponsor: 534 - 2657 Surveyor /Engineer: 535 - 1410 H E E Investments, Inc. Inland Pacific Engineering Co. E. 6614 Main c/o Dick Mason Spokane, WA 99206 S. 25 Altamont St. Spokane, WA 99202 Location: The proposal is located in Spokane Valley, south and adjacent the Spokane River, east and adjacent Barker Road, north and adjacent Mission Avenue, and west and adjacent Hodges Road extended; within Section 8, Township 25N, Range 45 EWM., Spokane County, Washington Comprehensive Plan: URBAN History: The Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development concept both were approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on March 30, 1982. This proposal had included an Environmental Impact Statement, which had identified a number of impacts. The traffic and school impacts were mitigated by requiring the proposal be finalized in phases over an 8 -year or more period. One of the conditions of approval required the FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN be reviewed within one year. The sponsor's agent made an application on February 24, 1983 and has since been coor- dinating closely with the county department staffs regarding the FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. Proposal: The sponsor is requesting a change -of- condition of the prelim- inary plat and planned unit development approval: 1) that only half of the Final Development Plan be approved at this tithe, see page 74, 2)that 6 or more finalization phases be allowed within a 6 -year period, 3) particular lots be allowed individual sewer treatment and 4) a redesign of lots and roads; and a request to approve the first half FINAL DEVELOP- MENT PLAN. The overall proposal was approved to subdivide 118 acres into 365 residential lots for planned unit development of mobile and manufac- tured homes and one commercial lot and to change the zoning on the 118 acres from Agricultural to RMH and Commercial, the commercial was for Lot 1, Block 1 at the southwest corner of the proposal. 73 STAFF REPORT, April 7, 1983 /MLANO PAClPK £N•/M!ER /MB COMPANY. 74 • PE- 1414 -8] 4.: J STAFF REPORT, April 7, 1983 PE- 1414 -81 II. SPECIAL INFORMATION A. Final Development Plan Approval Process The March 30, 1982 Hearing Examiner Committee approval included Planning Condition /{18 which establishes a new method of evaluating the Final PUD by the Hearing Examiner Committee and, as important, by the sponsor. The original approval is, for the most part,_a_ conceptual approval which conildels land use /zoning compatjbiLi.ty_and_ compliance and estalishes a procedure for finajjziing the proposal. These consideration are made about an "optimistic" proposal that has yet to survive the detailed, lengthy and costly process of engineering design and regulation /condition of approval compliance. When the sponsor, after the original approval, attempts to finalize and develop the project, many times he finds that the various conditions and regulations required have made his original proposal unrealistic or uneconomical, therefore, unable to develop as he had intended. Recognizing that the PUD overlay zone is used for the purpose of allowing unique and innovative development which deviates from the zone classification standards, the Hearing Examiner Committee consi- ders the uniqueness or amenities of a proposal when deciding to grant the PUD overlay zone, but the original approval is of a "concept" that is conditioned for a FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN hearing. The second approval step (FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN) which requires con- siderable engineering and design efforts and costs prevents a sponsor from having to expend these monies if the proposal were initially denied and allows the sponsor time to "fine- tune" or identify the realistic aspects of his original proposal if it was approved. In the past, some PUD FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS have been a mere title change on the preliminary PUD and little consideration was given by the sponsor regarding the realities of his proposal until he began finalizing or developing the project only to realize serious limitations. Similarly, the Hearing Examiner Committee did not have additional details of specific improvements or amenities of who and when (if at all) the particular aspects of a FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN was to accomplish; therefore, the Hearing Examiner Committee had minimum information to consider the "worth" of a proposal and whether a PUD overlay zone was, indeed, warranted. As a condition of approval, the FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN now requires a TEXT with two parts: 1. Estimated construction schedule for the total long -term development of the open space as landscaping, recreational facilities and other improvements. List by type (referring to the Final Development Plan for location) and give estimated date of completion (this may go well beyond finalization of the plat). 75 STAFF REPORT, April 7, 1983 II. SPECIAL INFORMATION ( cont'd) A. Final Development Plan Approval Process (cont'd) 2. Minimum construction schedule for those items in (1.) above, which are specifically planned to be improved as the plat is being finalized. Each item should have the estimated cost of construction, when the improvement is to be made as it relates to a particular phase of the proposal being finalized, and the method of funding the improvement (as Home Owner's Association and /or sponsor). These schedules will allow both the Hearing Examiner Committee and the sponsor to evaluate the adequacy of how the project is to be developed and whether the project can be cost effective enough to develop, respectively. B. Change -of- Condition A Redesign is being requested by the sponsor. Richard Mason with Inland Pacific Engineering Company (IPEC) has, at the sponsor's request, made detailed engineering and construction cost estimates in preparing to develop the FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The result of the evaluation was that the development costs would not support the "concept"design. The sponsor finds that larger lots will be required with individual septic tank /drainfields to make the project cost effective. Larger lots cause the original road locations to shift somewhat. The "Open- Space" as originally proposed is reduced to the minimum allowed in the P.U.D. overlay zone, due to excessive installation and.maint.costs. The FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN was to be approved for the entire project; however, since the development is required to be developed over an 8 -year period the sponsor is unable to predict the future housing market and public housing needs for much more than a three- to four -year period. Therefore, the sponsor's engineer working closely with the Planning Department has proposed only the south half of the P.U.D. and is requesting the Commercial site and the north half of the P.U.D. be allowed to be heard by the Hearing Examiner Committee at a later time; this is a change -of- condition to the original approval. The Phasing•requirements to mitigate the environmental impacts, as traffic and school children, were conditioned for 6 to 8 similar -sized phases for an 8 -year or more period of time. The construction cost evaluation suggests smaller phases are needed; therefore, the sponsor is requesting that this project be allowed to be developed in 6 or more phases over a period of not less than 6 years for the entire project ( being the Nl /2 and S1 /2). The Method of Sewerinq is being requested to be on -site septic tanks for 92 larger lots, as another change -of- condition; again due to cost effectiveness of the project relative to developing a community sewer collection system with large community drainfields. 76 PE- 1414 -81 4 ✓ a STAFF REPORT, April 7.1983 II. SPECIAL INFORMATION (cont'd) B. Change -of- Conditions (cont'd) PE- 1414 -81 As a separate attachment to this staff report, the Sponsor's comments are provided for your review. These comments go into more detail and are somewhat separate from some of the coordination and communication with the planning department.: staff. C. Proposed FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The proposal identified as "Final Development Plan" rec'd 3/15/83 is submitted by the sponsor as both the preliminary plat and the final development plan, as redesigned. This proposal has 92 larger lots (62' x 140'), 67 smaller lots (60' x 100') and a per the note regarding Blocks 14 and 15, if the homeowners association does not purchase these blocks for additional open space then the 19 .future lots could be filed as shown on the plan. This SOUTH Half of Riverway Villa would have 159 lots with an additional 19 if not purchased for open space. The open space proposed is 10% of the gross property size (50.2 acres) which is the minimum amount called for under the PUD Zone, if the additional property is purchased by the home owners then a total of 20% open space or 10 acres would be available. This proposal identifies the sponsors minimum development schedule regarding amenities beyond the required development improvements. The submittal entitled "Optimum Development Design" rec'd 3/15/83 ident- ifies the maximum amenities that are designed for this planned unit dev- lopment. The submittal entitled "Final Development Plan - Estimated Construction Costs (I Required construction by Sponsor; II Required Maintenance Costs by Homeowners Association or Homeowners; and III Optional Installation or Maintenance Cost Incurred by Homeowners Association)." rec'd 3/23/83 identifies the improvements and estimated costs responsible by the sponsor (as $1,515,000) and identifies the maintenance costs and the optional costs to the homeowners. All three sections to this submittal when totaled represents the "Estimated Construction Schedule" and the "Optimum Devel- opment Design" shows where; and the first two sections of this submittal represents the "Minimum Construction Schedule" which identifies what the sponsor will install and when and identifies what the homeowners will be responsible for. The third section identifies the homeowners long term option for amenity facility improvements.that will be funded and paid for through the Homeowners Association, See separate attachment. Note: The community drainfields will be eliminated in the future when this development is required to connect to the Valley area -wide public sewer system. Also, dry sewer lines are required to be installed in the streets even with on -site septic tanks. D. Landscaping If landscaping is not installed prior to filing that portion of the prel- iminary plat, then a landscape bond will be required; therefore an overall landscape plan will need to be prepared by a qualified professional prior to filing the first phase. And only that phase need be bonded. 77 STAFF REPORT, April 7,1983 III. COUNTY REVIEW AND COMMENTS A. County Engineering Department The engineering department in reviewing the redesign and change -of -cond- itions finds no additional conditions are needed. The sponsor has requested o , -, a deviation of the county road standards within the proposal and this will 'be decided by the County Engineer and will not affect the proposal decision. dyr/ B. County Utilities Department The Utilities Department is recommending conditions be added. They concure with the sponsors request for on -site sewer disposal systems (septic tanks) but only to a number of lots that would make it cost effective to operate a community drainfield system. They are recommending the standard conditions for septic tanks and ULID conditions as well as calling for dry sewer lines be installed in the streets with each phase being finalized, this would 7 include each lot to be double plumbed also. The utility department will determine the quantify of lots able to use septic tanks /drainfield on -site N' � ` ' before the community sewer is required. k 1. r• 37 Lots C. County Health District The Health District is recommending the standard condition regarding the lot owners needing to aquire a septic tank permit from the health district. IV. LEAD AGENCY CONCLUSIONS /RECOMMENDATIONS 78 PE- 1414 -81 A. Regarding the overall redesign, although the redesign eliminates much of the generous "open space" of the original concept plan it does conform to the requirements of the PUD Zone. Staff finds the cost estimates do support the sponsors position and futher finds that the free market of residential lots will best determine whether the level of amenities and facilities are needed or not, as further change -of- condition hearings can be held to improve or expand on these needs if the sponsor so chooses due to that housing market. The total number of lots now being proposed in this SOUTH half is less than the original approval and therefore is within the evaluation parameters of the Environmental Impact Statement. Staff does RECOMMEND APPROVAL. B. Regarding Half approval of the FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, staff finds that since this proposal its required to be developed over a number of years as a way of mitigating some of the impacts related to traffic and schools, then it cannot be expected of the sponsor to "predict" the future design and development specifics beyond the near future of three to four years. Staff does RECOMMEND APPROVAL. C. Regarding Phasing sized and period of time, staff finds that the request to allow smaller phases to be more realistic than the original condition of 6 to 8 phases. Changing that condition to allow 6 or more phases will allow the sponsor to coordinated his development phase sizes with community sewer and the housing market. Staff does RECOMMEND APPROVAL. The matter of allowing the entire development to be finalized within - years as apposed to the original conditioned 8 years, staff finds that upon the review of the second half of the Final Development Plan in three (3) years will afford ample opportunity to extend or shorten the completion date of this STAFF REPORT, April 7, 1983 PE- 1414 -81 IV. LEAD AGENCY CONCLUSIONS/ RECOMMENDATIONS (cont'd) C. (cont'd) overall panned unit development based on the then current impacts of the traffic and schools. Staff does therefore RECOMMEND APPROVAL. D. Regarding On -site sewer disposal systems, staff finds that the Utilities Departments ability to determine when the proposal has developed to a point where it is cost effective to operate a community sewer system is reasonalble and will support the initial development of this project; plus with dry sewer lines in the streets and with the ULID conditions these few septic tank /drainfields will be easily converted to public in the future. Staff does also RECOMMEND APPROVAL. E. Regarding the Environmental Review, staff finds that the change -of- conditions to be within the original bounds of the Environmental Impact Statement. The staff overall recommendation is to approve the change -of- condition request with the below recommended conditions of approval. V. CONDITIONS If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. PLANNING CONDITIONS 1. That the plat and planned unit development be designed as indicated on the 3/15/83 revised preliminary plat of record for the South half of Riverway Villa and pursuant to the original conditions of approval, except as amended. The original conditions of approval continue to apply to that portion of this preliminary plat that has yet to receive FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN approval, except as amended herein. 2.. That the remaining portion of the preliminary plat of record without a FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN must within three (3)years have a Final Development plan submitted for review and approval before the County Hearing Examiner Committee. To retain preliminary plat approval for this remaining portion the Final Development Plan submi.tal.must be acted upon prior to May 1, 1986. 3. That the Preliminary Plat and Final Development Plan of the South Half be given conditional approval for three (3) years to May 1, 1986. The applicant may request a three (3) year Extension -of -Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. Such application should demonstrate the progress toward finalizing this Preliminary Plat and Final Development Plan. If a Time Extension is not requested in a timely manner or a Time Extension is not granted for either..iapproval, then both approvals are NULL & VOID. 4. That Planning Condition #3. of the March 30,1982 Findings & Order be amended to allow 6 or more phases and allow the finalization period for the prelimin- ary plat to be 6 years, with another evaluation given prior to May 1, 1986 regarding the 6 year period relative to mitigating the impacts of traffic and impacts on the schools. 79 STAFF REPORT, April 7, 1983 PE- 1414 -81 V. CONDITIONS (cont'd) PLANNING CONDITIONS (cont'd) 5. That the FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN is approved pursuant to the sponsor providing the "Minimum Construction Schedule" as listed in Section I and on the Final Development Plan(Revised Preliminary Plat of Record 3/15/83). Each item applicable to any phase being finalized will be required to be ddveloped with that phase. 6. That a "Detailed Landscape Plan" shall be prepared by a qualified pro- fessional prior to finalizing any portion of this Final Development Plan and will require approval of the Spokane County Subdivision Administrator. This said plan will be for only that area of the preliminary plat with the approved Final Development Plan. 7. The "Detailed Landscape Plan" shall include the following: a. Vegetative cover or plants or trees by type size, height, quantity, and location. b. Type improvements to common areas. c. Landscape irrigation system by type and location and coverage. d. West perimeter fence and any gates showing style, materials and indicating covering and color. e. Current cost estimates for installation by phase. 8. That each phase have the landscaping installed per the approved landscape plan prior to filing that phase or a bond be established to assure the landscaping will be installed. The bond 'and bond amount will be approved by the County Subdivision Administrator and held by the County Planning Department until the bond is released with the approval of the County Planning Dept. 9. That the Homeowners Association document required to be recorded with the filing of a final plat shall include the operation and maintenance of the landscapting and is to assure proper funding of same to assure on -going maintenance. HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS 10. That the dedicatory statement of each Final Plat with on -site sewer disposal systems shall include the following: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems may be authorized on those lots designated for such use by the County Utilities Director." COUNTY UTILITIES CONDITIONS 11. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418 the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized for a limited number of lots in the South Half of the Preliminary Plat/ PUD. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application and approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer. The number of lots allowed for on -site systems will be determined by the Utilities Department based on cost effective operation of the commun- ity sewer system for the site. 80 sfr STAFF REPORT, April 7, 1983 PE- 1414 -81 V. CONDITIONS (cont'd) COUNTY UTILITIES CONDITIONS (cont'd) 12. The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further argee not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. 13. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area -wide collection systems. 14. A dry sewer connection to the future Sewerage System is to be constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer connection are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. 81 BR 3201 N. /793 0 POI 4,. 8. To I1 e` R.4101 • • • 3fi • • • • • t • • • • • • • •• • e .1700 Co /eerf BERN HILL • • • /4 • 7" SA7K4 J IL. /652 • • • in • • C1.1365 •e 1 "- 440r•r• [ re••C BA 420 5 "'sue I, w c 2 e, 82 /2 Inter - office Communication Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee To From Villa - Chan .Bob McCann, Plat Inspector Subject • PE 1414 - 81 Riverwa The County this hearing. not provide for in., letter request to' the County Typical BMc /set Form 327-C P. OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON e • • • • Date e of Condition Reruest' March 7 Engineer's •Department•has no new "Conditions of Approval" to add at The committee should be advised that Spokane Count Road Standa d right -of -way ,widths or roadway widths as requested by the applicant, of. February 23, 1983. The.applicant must submit a•design deviation County,Engineer. This request must specify the reasons why'Spokane Roadway Sections should not be constructed•4to.serve this developments INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. South 25 Altamont Street Spokane, Washington 99202 February 23, 1983 Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 Attn: Mr. John Nunnery, Subdivision Administrator RE: Riverway Villa, Final Development Plan PE- 1414 -81 ZE -92 -81 PUDE -1 -82 Dear John: On behalf of H &E Investments, Inc. we request that the subject project be placed on the Hearing Examiner Committee's April agenda. Please find attached applica- tion documents in accordance with the requirements of Findings and Order dated April 2, 1982. This submittal specifically requests the following approvals and conditions: 1. Change of Condition to allow the approval of the Final Development Plan for the south one -half of the project originally considered; and extension of time for a period of three years for the north one -half of the project and the 10 acre commercial site. 2. Change of condition to allow 32 foot wide streets (curb to curb) on 36 foot wide rights of way on all interior streets and a 40 foot wide street (curb to curb) on a 44 foot wide right of way for Indiana. 3. Change of Condition to allow the phasing of the preliminary plat in 6 phases or more over a period of not less than 6 years, 4. Approval of the Final Development Plan for the south one -half of the preliminary plat of Riverway Villa. 5. Variance of front yard setback requirement to 12 feet minimum from the front lot line. 6. Approval for the use of individual on -site septic tank and drainfield systems on the first 92. lots developed, Those. lots specifically are identified as: Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Environmental Analysis ECEIVED FEB 231983 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Spokane County Planning February 23, 1983 Page Two (2) This submittal includes the following: 1. Final development plan 2. Sponsor minimum development requirements and schedule 3. Optimum development design 4. Commentary. We will submit under separate cover the estimated construction cost for the sponsor's development requirements and the homeowners cost elements. We appre- ciate your cooperation and assistance in developing this application and are available to answer questions at your convenience. Sincerely, INLAND PA IFIC ENGINEERING CO. Richard L. Mason RLM: j es • enc. Lots Block 7 -10 1 1 -12 6 1 -20 7 1 -10 8 1 -31 9 5 -19 10 FEB 23 1983 SPOKANE COUNT! PLANNING DEPARTMENT •Riverroy Baldwin Au°urta Minion 200' 400' 600' 800' n o r m INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY ECEIVED FEB 231983 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT RIVERWAY VILLA • RIVERWAY VILLA FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTARY Background The Preliminary Plat of Riverway Villa was originally proposed as a 365 lot residential subdivision for manufactured homes. The Plat was approved with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay zone to allow for variances of lot sizes and setback requirements. Thp plat design was characterized by generous expanses of common open space at the rear of nearly all lots. Since the project's preliminary approval in March of 1982, the sponsor has made an extensive review to evaluate the project's marketability as well as its financial feasibility resulting in the following conclusipns: 1'. Because the market for lots zoned for manufactured homes is soft and is expected to remain soft for several years, the first few phases of developed lots must be small (20 to 30 lots per phase) and should not involve extraordinary front end costs such as the cost to con- struct sewage treatment and disposal facilities or sewage pumping facilities. Small phases developed at a reasonable cost per lot will allow the sponsor to "test" the market without becoming over- committed financially. 2. The project site is not of a character that the common open space proposed on the original plan would be inexpensive and self - maintaining. Since the project site is pow a cultivated field, all proposed common open space would require the installation of turf, irrigation systems . and landscaping. While the open spaces would be very pleasing vis- ually, the cost of developing and maintaining them is prohibitive and detracts significantly from the marketability of the lots. There- fore, the common open space must be consolidated to provide a more useful, less expensive space. 3. The areas set aside for community drainfields on the original plan are difficult to utilize apd result in far too many lots having frontage on only one side of the street. Too many double frontage lots exist along Mission apd Indiana. Both of these situations add significantly to the per 1pt development cost. The project design should be revised to elimipate these situations as much as possible. . 4. Since this project is relatively large and is required to be phased over a period of years, the sponsors desire to develop a plan for only half the proposed project and have the advantage of knowing the marketability of the first several phases of this project before finalizing the details for the second half of the project.. R ECEVVED FEB 231983 SPDXANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT . Revised Project Design Pursuant to the considerations outlined above, the project design has been revised to improve its financial feasibility and marketability. To reduce the extraordinary front end cost inherent in the project as ori- ginally approved the lot sizes of 92 lots have been revised to allow the placement of individual on -site septic tanks for use on an interim basis. These lots have minimum dimensions of 62' x 147' and can accommodate a septic tank and drainfield system for a three bedroom dwelling unit as well as the largest double wide manufactured hones and a double car garage. The front yard setback will be a minimum of 12 feet. All other setbacks are standard in accordance with the RMH zone. The septic tank system will include a small diversion manhole to make the switch from septic tank to public sewers as easy and inexpensive as possible. The septic tank lots are identified as follows: Lots • Slack 7 -10 1 1 -12 6 1 -20 7 1 -10 8 1 -31 9 5 -19 10 Upon completion of the final platting and improvement of these 92 lots, the sponsor will be required to construct a working community sewage treatment and disposal facility to service the 92 septic tank lots as well as all addi- tional lots. Lots. in excess of the 92 septic tank lots have a minimum size of 60'x107' as proposed in the original project. The common open space has been consolidated to two locations having a more useful configuration and being less expensive to develop and maintain. Two locations are identified as community drainfield and common area easements and show possible lot layouts. These areas' will be used initially for com- munity drainfields, however the sponsors'will provide the legal mechanism in the Homeowners Association rules and regulations to purchase all or part of the common area easements if the Association so chooses. Purchase of these sites would be subject to the conditions set forth by the County Utili- ties Department in conjunction with operation of the community drainfield system. If the Association chooses not to purchase the sites, and when the community drainfield system is abandoned by the County in favor of an area - wide system, the common area easement would become available for development into lots. It is important to note that the majority of the common open space provided in the original plan lies along the Spokane River and is not included in this Final Development Plan. It is expected the final plan for the north half of the project will consolidate much of the interior open space shown on the original plan but will retain most or all of the open space along the river. RECEIV FEB 231983 SPOKANE COUNTY PIANNINf DEPARTMENT The interior system 'of streets has been redesigned to eliminate much of the double frontage which existed on Mission and on Indiana and provides better traffic circulation than the previous plan. The right of way widths have been reduced with a corresponding increase in lot depths to conform with the County's policy of constructing the curb side storm drainage swales on private property for maintenance by the property owner. Homeowners Association and Protective Covenants The Homeowners Association Rules and Regulation; will be developed and submitted with the first final plat. Association Rules and Regulations will include provisions for organization structure, collecting assessments to support Association obligations, and policeing rules, regulations and protective covenants. The protective covenants will include requirements concerning skirting, landscaping, fencing, garages, storage of boats, trailers, recreational vehicles, etc. • Developer Provided Amenities The developer /sponsor proposes to provide at no extra cost to the buyer the amenities shown on the Final Development Plan and described on the "Sponsor Minimum Development Requirements ". STAFF ANALYSIS - M:. . 30, 1981 RIVERWAY VILLA (cont.) VI. CONDITIONS (cont.) PLANNING CONDITIONS (cont.) 29. That storage of flammable or hazardous materials are prohibited from being stored in any mini - warehouse units within this proposal, as a measure to protect the aquifer and quality of our drinking water. 30. That each final plat dedication will contain a warning statement regarding the prohibition of storing flammable and hazardous materials as approved by the County Subdivision Administrator, Prosecuting Attorney, and other appropriate department(s). 31. That prior to issuing any building permits on Lot 1, Block 1, the commerical site, a SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN(S) (all or part) must.be approved by the County Zoning Administrator, who will receive review comment from appropriate County departments. 32. That the County Zoning Administrator is directed to assure proper compliance with the Zoning Ordinance, assure proper measures for compatibility between existing or future adjacent land uses and the commercial site, assure that the commercial uses do not exceed those of neighborhood and local serving stores or services, and consider accommodation of "Park & Ride" space for the bus and /or a covered bus stop. Some items to be considered are: building size, height and setback; parking; paving; drainage; landscaping; signing; light- ing; buffering delivery truck traffic from adjacent manufactured home with sight and sound obscuring fence (as a S -ft. masonry wall); ingress /egress; loading areas; and others. 33. That if the County Zoning Administrator finds it appropriate due to problems or varying opinions, can bring the specific site development before the Hearing Examiner Committee for a decision at a public hearing. 34. That the most easterly final plats contain plat dedication which states: "Active agricultural pursuits with unusual working hours and the spraying of pesticides may be occurring on properties adjacent to lots within this plat until such time as this adjacent property is developed." 35. That a Substantial Development Permit will be needed for some improve- ments within the 200 -ft. Passive Recreation Area. ENGINEER CONDITIONS 1. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to dedication of right -of -way and appcovalof the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record and as approved by the County Engineer. 2. That plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 10 0 STAFF ANALYSIS - P -A 30, 1982 • RIVERWAY VILLA is nt.) VI. CONDITIONS (cont.) ENGINEER.CONDITIONS (cont.) 3. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. County Health District approval is also required of the drainage plans since drainage may effect the community drainfield sites. 4. That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. 5. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/ surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were in- stalled to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 6. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public.right -of -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 7. All construction within the existing or proposed public right -of -way is to be completed prior to filing each final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construc- tion of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 8. No direct access from lots to stub road connections until such roads are constructed to County standards and established as County roads. 9. Road design, construction, and drainage control for half right -of -ways and stub road connections are the responsibility of the Developer. 10. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded. A 1 -foot strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border each plat boundary. (Temporary cul -de -sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat bound- aries.) 11. A statement must appear in the dedicatory language of each plat that: "Individual driveway access permits will be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system." 12. Dedication of 15 ft. additional right -of -way along Barker Road . Dedication of 10 ft. additional right- of -way along Mission Avenue. 10 P STAFF ANALYSIS - Ma ._ 30, 1982 RIVERWAY VILLA cont.) ( VI. CONDITIONS (cont.) . ENGINEER CONDITIONS (cont.) 13. A statement shall be placed in each plat dedication that: "No direct access be allowed from residential lots to Barker Road or Mission Avenue." 14. Existing County roads providing d4xect access to the plat shall be paved and/par-curbed to the Spokane County Standards. 15. That all public roads within each plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County Standards. 16. That sidewalks are required along the arterial(s) on Barker Road/ Mission Avenue and along the collector Indiana. 17. Tht Public Road Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section be: Section Number 2 for Indiana with Minimum Paving width being the Collector Standard, and Section Number 2 for other public roads with Minimum Paving width being the Access Standard. 18.. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees in new construction. 19. That Barker Road be improved to Spokane County Major Arterial Standard on the plat half of the right -of -way. 20. That Mission Avenue be improved to No. 1 Secondary Arterial Standard including a combination bicycle -snow storage lane. Improvements are for the plat half of the right -of -way only. 21. Because of the traffic impacts of this development proposal upon the existing County Road System, it shall be the responsibility of the Developer to provide necessary right -of -way and improve Barker Road from Mission Avenue northward to the river. That improvements - to Mission Avenue and - Barker Road adjacent to Lot 1 Block 1 shall be a requirement of the zone change " and improve- ments will be constructed prior to the issuance of a building permit on that parcel. X 23. Improvemis ento Mission Avenue from the easterly line of Lot 1 Block 1 to the easterly plat boundary will be required as that phase of the project is developed either as a zone change or finalized as a plat. 24. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has re- sponded to the Environmental Impact Statement by stating that the additional traffic generated by this proposal will "cause a severe impact on the Barker Road /I -90 Interchange." Should it become. 0 Z t R-ve nENn T o /I1 %ss o. , 0 ,reri nt V Ozo' s«rto re i razat e Q T -ez- n1 dim/ e To stifle 469 ?.4e /Z, STAFF ANALYSIS - . 30, 1982 r RIVERWAY VILLA (cont.) VI. CONDITIONS (cont.) ENGINEER CONDITIONS (cont.) 24. (cont.) severely impacted the WSDOT would "Look to Spokane County to share in the cost of modifying the structure and /or ramps to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposal." . The applicant has indicated that the proposed subdivision /PUD will be phased over an eight -year period with eight or nine phases. (A ) traffic analysis of each phase will be required of the`deve_1"oper and") reviewed -by Spokane County prior to each plat finalization. This- - aoalysis wi be coordinated- with -the State _of_ -Washington- DevartmPnt Transportation f-the WSDOT determines that a wiL1 adverse- / ly impact I -90 facgity and Spokane County is' required tokparti- cipate in the improvement of the Barker Road interchange, Spokane County will require that the plat sponsors pay a)share of the wents based upon the proportionate traffic generated from this✓ proposal. , v Tra .na ysis for each phase will a+so serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Should the analysis determine a need for inter- section upgrading, the developer will be assessed a proportionate share for the required improvements. In the event future public agency funds are not available to construct improvements needed to mitigate traffic impacts created by particular phases of the project, the sponsor must provide adequate assurances to guarantee the implementation of the needed 'improvements or delay the development of the particular phases in question, until either private or public funds do become available to'construct the needed improvements. 25. That during construction, measures are to be taken to prevent deposit- ing mud onto paved arterial surfaces to minimize air pollution problems. UTILITIES CONDITIONS 1. "The owner, his heirs and successors shall join and participate'in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement distr x t (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended." Each plat dedication is to include this statement. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. 10 R • 950128 DECLARATION OF COVENANT t In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of Plat No. PE -1414, River Walk First Addition (hereinafter referred to as the "Plat "), the undersigned covenants and agrees that: 1. The subdivider /sponsor will construct the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 2. A lot is served by a private road when: (a) the only road frontage for the lot in the Plat is on the private road, or; (b) a lot having frontage on more than one road (public or private) constructs an approach to the private road. 3. The River Walk Owners Association or its successors in interest shall maintain the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. The River Walk Owners Association shall maintain the drainage swales within and adjacent to the public rights -of -way for Indiana Avenue and Mission Avenue with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of stormwater in the drainage swales as indicated by the approved plans. 4. The owner(s) of any lot created by the Plat or alteration thereof and served by a private road shall be responsible for maintenance of said private road, including associated drainage facilities, in conformance with approved plans on file with the County Engineer's office. 5. Maintenance financing of the private roads and associated drainage facilities shall be in a manner determined by the River Walk Owners Association or their successors in interest. 6. Should the River Walk Owners Association be terminated for any reason, the successors in interest shall be the individual lot owners, or their successors in interest, who are members of the River Walk Owners Association at the time of said termination. 7. In the event such private road including associated drainage facilities is improved to Spokane County standards for public streets, and the County is willing to accept the dedication of such road and drainage facilities, each lot owner shall execute any conveyance documents necessary to accomplish such dedication. 8. Owners of lots within the Plat who are served by such roan, may sue and recover damages and attorneys' fees from any owner of any lot within the Plat which is also served who refuses to participate in the road and drainage facilities construction, financing and maintenance. 9. WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, or maintainfor otherwise service the private roads, and associated drainage facilities contained within or providing service to the property described in the Plat. By accepting this Plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued for property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind of nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road or its associated drainage facilities. 10.Spokane County is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all private roads and /or drainage easements, for the purpose of inspection and emergency maintenance of drainage swales, and any other drainage facilities, if not properly maintained by the River Walk Owners Association, or their successors in interest. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect and maintain the drainage easements or drainage swales, nor does the County accept any liability for failure by the River Walk Owners Association, or their successors in interest to properly maintain such areas. 11.The lot owners within this Plat shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface path of natural or man -made drainage flow over and across their respective properties. 12.The lot owner or his representative shall inform each succeeding purchaser of all drainage easements on the property and of his responsibility for maintaining surface drainage paths and swales within said easements. 13.The River Walk Owners Association, or their successors in interest, shall maintain all water quality treatment swales ( "208" swales) and drainage ditches situated within this Plat, and any portion of a 208 swale situated in or adjacent to the public rights - of -way for Indiana Avenue and Mission Avenue adjacent to this Plat, with a permanent ground cover as specified on the current approved plans on file with the County Engineer's Office. The River Walk Owners Association, or their successors in interest, may install approved shrubbery and /or trees which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the 208 swales and drainage ditches, as indicated by the current approved plans on file with the County Engineer's Office. The River Walk Owners Association shall maintain the drywells, as shown on the approved road plans, located in private drainage facilities. 14.Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas, nor the responsibility for any drainage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. 15. Whenever the River Vvalk Owners Association, or their succrssors in interest, fail to maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved drainage plan, a notice may be given to the River Walk Owners Association, or their successors in interest, by the County. If not corrected within the period indicated on said notice, the County has the right to correct the maintenance failure, or have it corrected, at the expense of the River Walk Owners Association, or their successors in interest. 16.Any building that is constructed on a lot in this Plat shall be set at such an elevation so as to provide positive drainage away from any drainage entry point to the building (including but not limited to a window well, a window unprotected by a window well, or a doorway). Said positive drainage shall consist of a minimum slope of 3% away from the building for a distance of at least 10 feet from the building. The lots shall be graded so that either a) all runoff is routed away from the building, and conveyed over the lot to a natural drainage swale or approved drainage facility, or b) drainage intercepted on the lot is disposed of on the lot in an approved drainage facility. The approved drainage facility shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file at the County Engineer's Office. Any revisions to the approved drainage plans must be approved by the County Engineer's Office prior to construction of said revisions. 17.Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas, nor the responsibility for any damage whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. 18.This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road and drainage facilities as provided herein. Dated this 2 6 day of 3 J L`( 19 S STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP BY: ITS: BY: BY: HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION A WASHINGTON CORPORATION IT ENERA 1 - \ i 4Q- h BY: ITS: 6 DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION A WASHINGTON CORPORATION ITS GENERAL PARTNER STATE OF WASHINGTON County of K,Ny On this ,, no day of , 1995, before me personally appeared Brian Housley, known to me, or on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be the President of Housley Development Corporation, a Washington Corporation, and who executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of said corporation, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same as their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year last written above. No ary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at r3r1/4 n woo D My Commission Expires G /.s - /s c STATE OF WASHINGTON County of On this a6 "' day of y 1995, before me personally appeared Edward Dean, known to me, or on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be the President of Dean Building Corporation, a Washington Corporation, and who executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of said corporation, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same as their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year last written above. Notdry ublP is in and for the State of Washington, residing at C n .-w,o. ri My Commission Expires 4//s 9 4 P -1414 = 9507280291 '0I. 1-753PAGE1.171 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEEeING FILED OR RE:', ■nUcu Spokane County, Washington TEMPORARY TURNAROUND AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTOUES ' CO -A-`= IN THE MATTER OF INDIANA AVENUE, RF NO. 1689, KNOW ALL MEN BY JBIE 12 42 PM IS PRESENTS, that the Grantor(s), Stanton Development Company, a WashingtonyGener$ QQHAHUE Partnership, for and in consideration of Mutual Benefits, conveys and warrants to Spolf qoR . County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, a Temporary Turnarc9AQi skICOUNTY WASH. Drainage Easement over, upon, and across the following described lands: DEPUTY PORTION OF ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS.: 55083 9010 AND 55083.9052 A portion of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, W.M., more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of said Section 8; thence N.37 °28'22 "E., a distance of 1696.03 feet to the True Point of Beginning of the land hereinafter described; thence N.60 °00'02 "E., a distance of 123.50 feet; thence S.29 °59'58 "E., a distance of 160.00 feet; thence S.60 °00'02 "W., a distance of 123.50 feet, thence N.29 °59'58 "W., a distance of 160.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Located in the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 45 East , W.M., Spokane County, Washington. The easement granted to Spokane County and its authorized agents is for the purpose of allowing natural drainage and /or runoff over and across the described lands. The Grantor(s) hereby agree not to obstruct, artificially collect or discharge the flow across or adjacent to the above described lands. The Grantor(s) agree that Spokane County accepts no responsibility for maintaining the drainage Easement. The easement grants to Spokane County and its authorized agents the right of ingress and egress to, over, and from said Easement for the purpose of inspection and emergency maintenance of drainage facilities. The easement contained herein grants to Spokane County and its authorized agents, a Temporary Turnaround Easement over and across the above described lands. The Grantor(s) agree that Spokane County accepts no responsibility for maintaining the turnaround Easement. Stanton Development Company accepts complete and total responsibility for the construction and perpetual maintenance for the facilities located within this drainage easement per plans on file in the office of the Spokane County Engineer. This easement will terminate at such time the described areas are platted. At that time, the property subject to the easement described herein shall revert to Grantor(s) free and clear of any claim by Spokane County and its assigns to the continued right to use property subject to the easement. The Grantor(s) hereby releases Spokane County, and all of its officers, employees and agents from any responsibility or liability for any damage whatsoever including inverse condemnation by or to any and all persons of property arising out of or in any way incident to or attributable to the storm drainage within the easement. The easement described hereinabove is to and shall run with the land. No modification of the boundaries of said easement can be made without prior approval of Spokane County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this insturment to be executed on this Z5a"'day of auLY , 1995. R. E. Excis Tax Exempt Date z 6 is 9 ounty Treas. �-i 1753PAGE1172 STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP BY:HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION A WASHINGTON CORPORATION TS GENERAL PART ER BY: ITS: zea.•....A_.t I . 9 BY:DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION A WASHINGTON CORPORATION ITS GENERAL PARTNER BY: ITS: ✓tc-C STATE OF WASHINGTON ) County of /ii x On this a day of qty 1995, before me personally appeared Brian Housley, known to me, or on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be the President of Housley Development Corporation, a Washington Corporation, and who executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of said corporation, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same as their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. tr e`K r Sr ty f?andtpnd official seal hereto affixed the day and year last written above. x':. ,Nock fi t i t5iip in anchor the State ; et \ft;alhlrigton, residing at , - �, 2+�,.e i�al My�,iCef ijpission, Expires 4 -i 4 - -5 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) County of /yip, On this f ,?s'»`day of .14o✓fii 1995, before me personally appeared Patrick J. Corr, known to me, or on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be the Vice President of Dean Building Corporation, a Washington Corporation, and who executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of said corporation, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same as their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. witness,it hAnd and official seal hereto affixed the day and year last written above. re s r• u�ilroinandforthe tat 5t)t " toq .T2srdiing a __ grilijij sioh Expires � - /S SG JUL -20 -1995 16 38 INLAND PACIFIC ENG TO: al% SPO/KA4f lwl/.vTy 5/V6 ATTENTION: Description M)( 0 Xerox Prints 0 Original Drawing 0 Work Authorization No. Copies Purpose INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 C5 0 Review & Comments EJ Written Approval 0 Signature & Return Remarks /dye 110-e'5 /iyn, lei/ /ia4, /, neecQ 10 coin er c temp eas on le / l� Signed. Description I PE 32Y- 3yfl 0 Copy of Letter 0 Contract Documents 0 Report P.01 DATE. I.P.E. PROJECT #: 72L % 2o /WS 95527 PROJECT NAME /1 fret a � /< t7)-sr Ad �/i 1 PT /4"7& /i� r /i / 4'* 0 t I Per Your Request n Y€ -: r7 cr r`o u have Clht� JUL -20 -1995 16 :39 Prepared for: Re: STANTON DEVELOPMENT Charge : $175.00 Sales Tax: 14.00 Total : $189.00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: VESTED IN: EXCEPTIONS: INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.02 RECE±vE:°: TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY JUL 20 1995 NCRTE. 720 ARGON'NE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99212 1, E C DEAN- HOUSLEY CO. ATTN: MARK HANCOCK 16720 NE 116T3 STREET REDMOND, WA 99052 cc: Inland Pacific Engineers /Calkins cc: North Idaho Engineering Inc. /Morris Transamerica No. : MW194985 L I M I T E D L I A B I L I T Y C E R T I F I C A T E This is a report as of July 13, 1995, at 8:00 m covering property hereinafter described. The information contained herein is made solely for the purpose of determining the status of the property described herein, is restricted to the use of the addressee, and is no: to be used as a basis for closing any transaction affecting title to said property- Liability is limited to the charge made for this certificate. A portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, W.M., more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING.at the Southwest corner of said. Section 8; thence North 37 °28'22" East 1696.03 feet to the True _Point of Beginning of the land hereinafter described; thence North 6'0 °00'02' East 123.50 feet; thence South 29 °59'58" East 160.00 feet; thence Scut: GO °00'02" West 123.50 feet; thence North 29 °59'SS" West 160.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Washington General Partnership, as nominee for Stanton Spokane Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership. Page 1 of LI JUL -20 -1995 16:39 1. General taxes, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delincuenc-: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half deiincllent on November 1) Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid Principal Balance 55083.9010 1995 $651.21 5325.61 5325.60 55083.9052 1995 $4,134.58 $2,067.29 $2,067.29 2. The legal description of the land described herein is a portion of a County Tax Assessor's Parcel. Conveyance of a portion of said parcel may violate R.C.W. 58.17. Under Exclusions from Coverage, loss arising from such a violation is excluded from policy coverage. 3. Assessments levied by Consolidated T ^= -: District No. 19, together with interest, penalty and statutory fo )- ire costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delin enc. on ?November 1) Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid Principal Balance 55083.9010 1995 $396.40 $152.20 $198.20 55083.9052 1995 $1,378.40 C.S "0 $659.20 4. Liability to future assessments by Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19 5. Liability to future charges by Spokane Cout. 6. Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions recorded on May 20, 1994, under Recording No. 7. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.03 Page 2 of 4 Order No. MW194985 for Storm Water service. imposed by instrument 9405200420. Stanton Development Company, a Washington general partnership, on its own behalf and as nominee for Stanton Spokane L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership ingreES and egress Rivergay Villa Entrance May 13, 1994 May 20, 13= 9405200413 JUL -20 -1995 16:40 8. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: Investigation contacting the 9. DEED OF TRUST GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: INLAND PACIFIC ENG Stanton Development Company, a Washington General Partnership, as • nominee for Stanton Spokane Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership Transamerica Title Insurance Company Timberland Savincs Dank 5850,000.00 October 12, 1994 October 17, 199, 9410170458 should be made to determine the present balance owed by appropriate lender /acency /indi AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIO THEREOF: Stanton Development Company, a Washington General Partnership, as Nominee for Stanton Spokane Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership Transamerica Title i nsurance Company Timberland S=_ Lank $108,000.00 January 6, 19 January 2E, 1995 9501260003 Page 3 of P.04 Order No. MW194985 Investigation should be made to determine :he oresent,balance owed by contacting the appropriate lender /agency /individual. SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT AND THE TERNS AND co TANS THEREOF: RECORDED: January 26, 1995 RECORDING NO.: 9501260004 The above deed of trust was made subordinate to the deed of trust recorded under Recording No. 9405120396, set forth at paragraph 10 herein. JUL -20 -1995 16:40 GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: INLRND PACIFIC ENG 10. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Stanton Development Company, a Washington general tartne = ship, on its own behalf and as nominee for Stanton- Spokane L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership Transamerica Title Insurance Company Morves_ Cat•.ta_ Corporation, a British Columbia Corporation $500,000.00 May 10, 199 -1 May 12, 1954 9405120 Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owed by contacting the appropriate lender /agency /individual. (Covers property herein described and other property) SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS Th''EREOF: BY AGREEMENT DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: Enclosures Sketch sac END OF EXCEPTIONS Page 4 cf October 17, 1 99, , 94.10170459 11. Potential liability for assessments levied py Spokane Department for the Aquifer Protection Area. To • _ri In order to make payment, account number is n-- , .osca_. _: r ' , ,:/ j lr) P.05 Order. No. MW194985 The above deed of trust was made subordinate to the deed of trust recorded under Recording No. 9410170458, ser. forth at .paragraph 8 herein. County Utility call 458 -2538. TRA.NSAM.ESICA TITL2 INSURANCE COMPANY For Service. on this order call: (505) 922 -2222 (FAX) 926 -1519 Maureen Willi, Title Officer LOTS 4 4e7 40G' • 25.93/?c /p eo.G 1' LOT6 .3S.2S/1c. 4/3019c. „ Po a 43” SO49JecT �o AFo7), 4a A JUL - 12 795 WED 9:12 AM NORTH_ IDAHO ENGINEERING FAX NO. 208 664 3507 P. 1 . North 1 ,aho Engineering, :nc. 4200 Selrice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 - 1171 • Fax (208) 664 -3507 +i ssSSSsSSSSSSSS; Siiii Siiii iitiiii ititiitittiiitii3Sitiiiiiiiii *i FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL liliiiiiitiiili iiiiitiiiiiiittii *Stiff ;iii =iiititiititiitiiiiiiiii PAGE: (1) OF 2 DATE SENT 767-/ J.N. YAP/ COMPANY i Sptkone &'W1$ 5 ATTN : ne 4 P n 43 o U PTD REFS R iWS r ,I k rl'P6/ L J i [XI: a. C ] URGENT C 7 REVIEW AND RESPOND C 3 NORMAL /TODAY 7 '' PER YOUR REQUEST C ] APPROVAL C :.] .CONFIDENTIAL C ]INFORMATION C 3 OTHER: REGARDING: /P117 ACIA4P/04 end of /n)Jn'a. ifs 4 Linnxds SENT BY: jl m es D_ ,tZ »th MESSAGE: ILO flai ,1• ate ,04201/21 a.11#/# [Oars • /t'i / / 4_4a _ Pleas& J »3 papoea^i of chcom twit( fr- /A ,'s -Pass mom T_ k i , 6 1 9 NOTE: IF TRANSMISSION IS UNCLEAR, OR INCOMPLETE PLEASE CALL T ABOVE LISTED TELEPHONE NUMBER AND INFORM SENDER. • JUL - 12 - 95 WED 9:12 AM NORTH IDAHO ENGINEERING FAX N0. 208 664 3507 P. 2 - i A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST, W.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE NORTH 37'28'22" EAST 1696.03 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED; THENCE NORTH 60'00'02" EAST 123.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29'59'58" EAST 160.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 60'00'02" WEST 123.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 29'59'58" WEST 160.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON VARIANCE # BLDG # OTHER S , R `3-S PARCEL # PHONE - HOMF zti D14�A �v& /Ve, /4 9 The following documents are needed before the Spokane County Engineer's Department can begin processing your variance or building application as approved. (509) 456-3600 ROAD NAME AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES have been collected. RECORDED COPY OF DEED, DEED OF TRUST, contract or conveying instrument. These may be obtained from the County Auditor, 2nd floor of the Courthouse. LEGAL DESCRIPTION of your access easement. A LISTING OF NAMES of individuals who will be signing the documents. These individual names should appear as the person(s) legally sign their dame. A CURRENT ASSESSOR'S MAP which depicts the location of your property. OWNERSHIP MICRO -RUN. These may be obtained from the County Assessors, 1st floor, of the Courthouse, Jefferson entrance, 2nd door on the left. The necessary documents will be prepared by the Engineer "s Department, Right -of -Way Section, upon provision of the information noted above. You will be notified when the documents are ready for signature. The documents may be sent to you, however, IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED. The Engineer's Department does have notaries available if you choose to sign the documents at our office. Please call when ready dy Ca y� I i c Notice to Pudic #. O STA11JT6» Dev<(oprn°ni4 Cr) Mp tJ Right-of -Way COMMENTS RAyy Nt_E.D /fi/kpp TOR AI APOVAr/ (r fI i d - S,1( BIVO ZI 2A14/196 E91/46Eilicrv7S ARE cRAN1D _ To ►veatoft 4-5So c I eflow * 0 4-1 Wi r il/ Right -of -Way Agent k\$Anoticc.192 5� APPLICANTS NAMF MAILING ADDRESS PHONE - WORK_ Please mail when ready Forward to you from I% V -7) deg P -1414 VOL. t r' 53 PAGE l 171 t /Y/7' SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING El OR riF rutoEu Spokane County, Washington TEMPORARY TURNAROUND AND DRAINAGE EASEMENtre�.�`�UJES' 'v (0-6 -`-= IN THE MATTER OF INDIANA AVENUE, RF NO. 1689, KNOW ALL MEN BY E& 12 42 ?M'95 PRESENTS, that the Grantor(s), Stanton Development Company, a Washington`G999-41._ DOHAHOE Partnership, for and in consideration of Mutual Benefits, conveys and warrants to Spo OR County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, a Temporary Turnarid•A1�t�iEPUTY' W . Drainage Easement over, upon, and across the following described lands: :3:10'7 PORTION OF ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS: 55083.9010 AND 55083.9052 A portion of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, W.M., more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of said Section 8; thence N.37 °28'22 "E., a distance of 1696.03 feet to the True Point of Beginning of the land hereinafter described; thence N.60 °00'02 "E., a distance of 123.50 feet; thence S.29 °59'58 "E., a distance of 160.00 feet; thence S.60 °00'02 "W., a distance of 123.50 feet, thence N.29 °59 "W., a distance of 160.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Located in the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 45 East , W.M., Spokane County, Washington. The easement granted to Spokane County and its authorized agents is for the purpose of allowing natural drainage and /or runoff over and across the described lands. The Grantor(s) hereby agree not to obstruct, artificially collect or discharge the flow across or adjacent to the above described lands. The Grantor(s) agree that Spokane County accepts no responsibility for maintaining the drainage Easement. The easement grants to Spokane County and its authorized agents the right of ingress and egress to, over, and from said Easement for the purpose of inspection and emergency maintenance of drainage facilities. The easement contained herein grants to Spokane County and its authorized agents, a Temporary Turnaround Easement over and across the above described lands. The Grantor(s) agree that Spokane County accepts no responsibility for maintaining the turnaround Easement. Stanton Development Company accepts complete and total responsibility for the construction and perpetual maintenance for the facilities located within this drainage easement per plans on file in the office of the Spokane County Engineer. This easement will terminate at such time the described areas are platted. At that time, the property subject to the easement described herein shall revert to Grantor(s) free and clear of any claim by Spokane County and its assigns to the continued right to use property subject to the easement. The Grantor(s) hereby releases Spokane County, and all of its officers, employees and agents from any responsibility or liability for any damage whatsoever including inverse condemnation by or to any and all persons of property arising out of or in any way incident to or attributable to the storm drainage within the easement. The easement described hereinabove is to and shall run with the land. No modification of the boundaries of said easement can be made without prior approval of Spokane County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this insturment to be executed on this Z9"day of DULY 1995. R. E. Excite / Tax Exempt Date / / 6 1 ounty Treas. V)0,11 voi. 1_753 PAGE 1172 STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP BY:HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION A WASHINGTON CORPORATION •TS GENERAL PART ER BY: yes.•. 4 . t . ITS: Wet= v BY:DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION A WASHINGTON CORPORATION ITS GENERAL PARTNER BY: ITS: ✓�L C STATE OF WASHINGTON ) County of /{ On this a day of 1/4/4<zj , 1995, before me personally appeared Brian Housley, known to me, or on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be the President of Housley Development Corporation, a Washington Corporation, and who executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of said corporation, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same as their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. 22 A •, Fis;Yile,9� lurid •p r)d official seal hereto affixed the day and year last written above. Sop f r blip in and' for the State �. o{, ,k C i trigton, residing at Znn,tirle Cpt Oision Expires G -/ C -$ A STATE OF WASHINGTON ) County of .) On this p 2s `day of '1995, before me personally appeared Patrick J. Corr, known to me, or on the basis of satisfactory evidence, to be the Vice President of Dean Building Corporation, a Washington Corporation, and who executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of said corporation, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the sane as their free and voluntary, act for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Witnes ntiAp1 and official seal hereto affixed the day and year last written above. it Ilo:ln and for the tat ons r$srding a a/ is o - h Expires 4 - 54 r} - y5 3 id8'3. oi/o c ' L L' O A Temporary Turnaround Easement 5 and 6, of Section 8, T.25 N., State of Washington, more partil Beginning at the Northwest of said Section 8; thence feet to the TRUE POINT OF F description; thence N.56 °2] thence N.33 °38'27 "W. a disc S.56 °21'33 "W. a distance of S.33 °38'27 "E. a distance of a distance of 37.48 feet; t 97.50 feet to the True Poin CO ; 4.4 AV(. 2439 a ` TEMPORARY TURNAROUND EASEMENT RIVERWALK FOURTH ADDITION February 14, 1996 Lots one, .61 et; "E. of p(4(4 RECEIVED JUN 0 6 1996 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Post -Ita Fax Nolo Date (a 1 / T ; a To Ft e �7 x/ 7671 T� I OO n From . P &a . Co /Depr. intim ^WC Co. :L -f7 c___ Pncne a Ptb KR. 7 oe 4 0 cD s q 0 FUN 3a 4 , 1 (0 4d ) Z/5 Faa d (n - 7 DEC -02 -1996 09:46 t 1 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Telephone - (509) 458 -6840 FAX - (509) 458 -6844 LAND PACIFIC ENG ;D z2— 9; flaw.. ® FROMa1 dIe 1c_ 4- P. 01 94) 1a( • NUMBER OF PAGES: JO NUMBER INCL. COVER PAGE FAX TRANSMISSION 7 fie,_ pwc n A3/4 e at- DEC -02 -1996 09:47 'LAND PACIFIC ENG P.003 a' DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOT 9 BLOCK 4 WALK FIRST ADDITION An easement for drainage over a portion of Lot 9, Block 4, Riverwalk First Addition, as recorded in Book 23 of Plats, Pages 37-40, in the Spokane County Auditor's Office, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 9; thence N.60 °00'02 1 E. along the north line thereof a distance of 45.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence S.29 °59'58 "E. a distance of 17.00 feet; thence N.60 °00'02 "E. a distance of 30.00 feet; thence N.29 °59'58 "W. a distance of 4.00 feet; thence N.60 °00'02 "E. a distance of 19.00 feet; thence N.29 ° 59'58 "W. a distance of 3.00 feet; thence 5.60 °00'02 "W. a distance of 34.00 feet; thence N.29 °59'58 "W. a distance of 10.00 feet; thence S.60 °00'02 "W. a distance of 5.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Situate in the. County of Spokane, State of Washington. 4EXP }RES i znr 9l7 �� E /1,GG Il a wris DEC -02 -1996 0S:47 I i 7 t rroi9kln7'U/9poPS- rn i s )/9 hi) ir$ m& MIAYin. WHEN RECORDED RETURN T0: TRUNKEN60LE & CARL,SON, P.S. E. 12704 NORA SPOIWNS, WA 99210 THE GRANTORS, STANTON - SPORA1411 LP o Washington Limited Partnership; IN CONSIDERATION of Ten Dollar. and other valuable consideration: In hand paid, convey and warrant to CASTLEWOOD Hf1MES. INC a Washington Corporation; the following described reel estate, situated in the County of Spokane. State cf Washington: Irl Bloch sot nn BLl13JF.CT TO: and Lot 9 in 1. Lability for future saaessments levied by Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19. 2. Liability for future assessments levied by Spokane county for Storm Water service. 3. All covenants, conditions, restrictions or reservations; all easements or other sea ituder, rights or Sena as which may be shown an the Plat a TectIng land outside the boundary described above, if any, disclosed by the recorded documents of the pat of Hiverwalk First addition, A Planned Unit Development, in Volume 23 of Plats, pages $7 • 40, 4. Declaration of Covenants and Restrietions imposed by instr,, ent recorded on May 20. 1994, under Recording No. 9405200420. Declaration or Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for River Walk Imposed by Instrument reeorded on July 25, 1995, under Recording No. 9007260912 Including, but net Limited to , liability for assessments levied by the vomsnunIty asxyciatlon, and rlg1tt4 01' benefits width moy be disclosed rdTecling land outside the beratdary described above. 0. Declaration of Covenant Imposed by 'instrument recorded an July 28, 1995. under Recording No. 9507280L7d. 7, Agreement and the terms end candltIons thereof recorded July 24, 1495. under Reeording No. 9 2 0 714 9 0139, Regarding Mitigation of student ttnpact. affecting this and other property. Dated: JANUARY 2, 1996 s600000414 STANTON • SPOKANE. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY GENERAL PARTNER BY OEAIN HULLOING CORPORATION _PND PACIFIC ENG SC01030241 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED cf • t : •„ ... 21:411' . 11 e e e A to pat re orvn Volume 23 of Pistw tome's 37, 58. 39 Sala EltiSO t. P aid p�: T U Sale Amt. a Corm Pd. 1f(yy.lf 0 S n nos 7 �;,••',ASStop .,d .• No te - y Fllblic en end for s--,... oe the � , • s St ate of r... (4 t , , , • v = w n �lVmhingtan. residing in a vvan na .� �` .,: P.134 V�'fl {�� At , n au o. CWRTZSY OF : riL °R 9[ON TITLE INSURANCE CO. scouts' ----- Jaa 4 WI 16 tilt"t%al ne _ it. Sr OFa yule TRAIlS),MERICA TITU. 3Y: EDWARD DE President of Dean Building STATE O1' WASIUNOTON ) ) as. County or ,efy ) On this da personally appeared before me FDWARt7 DEAN, 10 me known to be the PRESIDENT COP D RAN TiUILDING CORITRATION. who Is the General Partner of STAN /STN • SPOKANE LTM1TS.D PARTN ERR/ the Partnership who executed the within and foregoing instrument. and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free m and voluntary set and dl of said partnership for the uxa and purposes therein. mentioned and on Bath stated that he was author:red to e, ecu/e the said instrument J+.rr A.f.v r9 9C m GIVEN under y hand and official yea) this S day a(R6£$?'k$ -1996- \tfo C ,,,t rrv 'e rnrni o CAA DEC -02 -1996 09 46 BACK OF 6' SIDEWALK SCALE: 1' =20' TYPE B CURB & GUTTER EXIST. DRAINAGE RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT 45' J TRACT D" POND E;oTTOr\ w NB0'00'02 EXIST. DRAINAGE bt _ 1" - 'EASEMENT ^ i 6 ~L� `• ..r, — a I' Ij6000'01* E 7 S60 w J � \ I 4.00' 1429'59•S8'W PROPERTY EXIST. 13' UTILITY UNE & DRAINAGE EASMT. PROPERTY UNE n PROPOSED EASEMENT LAND PRCIFIC ENG INDIANA AVENUE RETAINING WALL LOT 9, BLOCK 4 RIVERWALK 1 ST ADDITION EASEMENT ADJUSTMENT fATV• 1n/22/96) n rn t P. 02 PEDESTRIAN RAMP DRYWELL EDGE OF ASPHALT RIGHT OF WAY 16' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7 • Sultp 200 (509) 458 -68 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 406 -8844 ACTION: R SCREEN: SPLI USERID: INC! H- HISTORY OF SPLITS AND COMBINATIONS JUR= 11 ROLL= RE PARCEL= 55083. 9052 Ci 3`t4 3. 90/0 ALTKEY= 1878853 YY /MM /DD EVENT 01- 96 03 25 CH 02- 96 03 25 CH 03- 96 03 25 CH 04- 96 03 25 CH 05- 96 03 25 CH 06- 96 03 25 CH 07- 96 03 25 CH 08— 96 03 25 CH 09 -- 96 03 25 CH 10- 96 03 25 CH 11- 11-*L009 HEADER CHANGE DWNER: STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY RELATED PARCEL REL ALTKEY YEAR DESCRPTN S 55083.0705 p / 55083. 0706 J a I( i doktfri 55083.0707 55083.0708 55083.0709 55083.0710 55083.0711 55083.0712 55083.9056 55083.9057 CHANGE - REASON: STATUS: SEGGED 3828887 97 CHILD A 3828895 97 CHILD A 3828909 97 CHILD A 3828917 97 CHILD A 3828925 97 CHILD A 3828933 97 CHILD A 3828941 97 CHILD A 3828950 97 CHILD A 3828968 97 CHILD 5 3828976 97 CHILD A Return to County Engineer Right of Way Department DOCUMENT TITLE: DRAINAGE EASEMENT GRANTOR: CASTLEWOOD HOMES, . INC. GRANTEE: SPOKANE COUNTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PTN. OF LOT 9 BLOCK 4, RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION ADDITIONAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ON PAGE 1 ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 55083.0409 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Spokane County, Washington INDIANA AVENUE NO. 2659 The Grantor(e) CASTLEWOOD HOMES, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION of the County of Spokane, State of Washington, for and in Benefits, the receipt of which in hereby acknowledged, grants County of Spokane, State of Washington, a Drainage Easement the following described real property situated in the County Washington: R.E ss inx Exempt tgy Date Spo urer riy: Lt DRAINAGE EASEMENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOT 9 BLOCK 4 RIVERWALK FIRST ADDT'[7JN A 1 easement for drainage over a portion of Lot 9, Block 4, PJverwalk Phut Addltlun, a3 recorded in Book 23 of Plats, Pages 37-40,1n the Spokane County Auditor's Office, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest comer of said Lot 9; thence N.60 °00'02 "E. along the north line thereof a distance of 45.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence 5.29 ° 59'58 "E. a distance of 17.00 feet; thence N.60 ° 00'02 "E. a distance of 30.00 feet; thence N.29 °59'58 "W. a distance of 4.00 feet; thence N.60 °00'02 "E. a distance of 19.00 feet; thence N.29 °59'58 "W. a distance of 3.00 feet; thence S.60 ° 00'02 "W. a distance of 34.00 feet; thence N.29 °59'58 "W. a distance of 10.00 feet; thence 5.60 °00'02 "W. a distance of 5.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 'Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. P/ /V consideration of Mutual to The Public of the over, under, and across of Spokane, ,State of I10WlliINI1111Y1111131;0 1 Drainage Easements, as described hereinabove are for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted to the public. The County of Spokane in hereby granted the fight of ingress and ogres° to all Drainage Easements adjacent to the public right of way. The property owner shall maintain the drainage area with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage area as indicated by tini approved plane. The Grantor will construct the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plane on file in the County Engineers Office. The individual lot owner° or their euccennore in interest shall maintain the drainage facilitien in conformance with the approved plane on file in the Engineers Office. The property owner or his representative shall inform each succeeding purchaser of all Drainage Easements on the property and his reoponeibility for maintaining drainage facilitieo within eaLd Drainage Easements. PAGE -1- CASTLEWOOD HOMES INC., a Washington Corporation STATE OP 1VASIIING1 ON COUNTY OP SPOKANE CO EN3 Dated. < -2 //, / 77/ 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 11 $0.00 4076738 Page: 2 of 2 0211311997 11:04A Spokane Co, WA The Dralnngo Easement described hereinabove to to and obeli run with the land. Ho modification of the boundaries of oaid Drainage Easement can be made without the prior approval of Spokane County. Whenever the individual lot owner(' or their oucceoeoro in interest fail to maintain the drainage foci]. Ltien in conformance with the approved Drainage Plan, a notice will be given to the individual lot owners or their successors In interest by the County. If not corrected after ten (10) days, the County han the right to correct the maintenance failure or have it corrected at the expense of the individual lot owners or their successors in interest. Spokane County does not accept the reoponolbility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within Drainage Easement(' or floodplaln areas, nor the reoponelbillty for any drainage whatsoever, including but not Limited to inverse condemnation to any property-en due to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage course(' in Drainage Easements on private property. IN WITNESS WHERE the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed on this Al — day of /9i, ...Cti 19 97 , I certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that /[.4440-•-s- is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he /she) signed this instrument, on oath slated that (he /she) was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Authorized Agent CASTLEWOOD HOMES, INC. to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned In the instrument. / Notary Public In dnd Washington, residing `11 1111II fff 1/4 9 „ d e d i: 0 2_4 • 5 2: /, , , 0 .� 9 for the stogy „ • l E. at Sgoksne. rue ‘c, �` g: 10 4 0 ; W AST • \- Return to County Engineer Right of Way Department DOCUMENT TITLE: GRANTOR: GRANTEE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ADDITIONAL ASSESSOR'S DRAINAGE EASEMENT CASTLEWOOD HOMES, INC. SPOKANE COUNTY PTN. OF LOT 9 BLOCK 4, RIVERWALK 1ST LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ON PAGE 1 TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 55083.0409 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Spokane County, Washington DRAINAGE EASEMENT The Grantor(e) CASTLEWOOD HOMES, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION of the County of Spokane, State of Washington, for and in Benefits, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grants County of Spokane, State of Washington, a Drainage Easement the following described real property situated in the County Waehingtont _ DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOT 9 BLOCK if • RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. - - l�'! � � E + 0'�4. : '1' ��I/1f$u �```` ADDITION consideration of Mutual to The Public of the over, under, 'and across of Spokane, ,State of An easement for drainage over a portion of Lot 9, Block 4, Rlverwalk First Addition, as recorded in Book 23 of Plats, Pages 37-40, in the Spokane County Auditor's Office, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 9; thence N.60 °00'02'E. along the north line thereof a distance of 45.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence 5.29 °59'58 "E. a distance of 17.00 feet; thence N.60 °00'02 "E. a distance of 30.00 feet; thence N.29 °59'58 "W. a distance of 4.00 feet; thence N.60 °00'02 "E. a distance of 19.00 feet; thence N.29 ° 59'58 "W. a distance of 3.00 feet; thence S.60 ° 00'02 "W. a distance of 34.00 feet; thence N.29 °59'58 "W. a distance of 10.00 feet; thence S.60 °00'02 "W. a distance of 5.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Drainage Easements, as described hereinabove are for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted to the public. The County of Spokane ie hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all Drainage Easements adjacent to the public right of way. The property owner shall maintain the drainage area with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage area as indicated by the approved plane. . The Grantor will construct the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plane on file in the County Engineers Office. The individual lot owners or their successors in interest shall maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the Engineers Office. The property owner or his representative shall inform each succeeding purchaser of all Drainage Easements on the property and his responsibility for maintaining drainage facilities within said Drainage Easements. PAGE -1- %``,\HSVtii de r., ? ; ' gnov i 2uipisaJ'uo)8ulyseM W 4a 0t 1 pun 111 allgnd £Je1oN uat. luawnJlsul ay1 1)l pauopuaw sasodind putt sasn ay) Jai AIM lions Jo ion tuelunlon pun asp alp aq•ol 'DMZ 'SHWOH QOOM3'ISSVD J pazjzoq ny alp SE 11 pa2palmouloe pun luaiunflsw alp a)naaxa o1 pazpoipnu sem (ays /ay) imp palels gpeo 1)o ')uauuu)sul sup paugls (ays /ay) le) paSpalmou>lae uosiad pies pun 'aw ainlaq pajeadde oIM uosiad alp sl i imp aauappsa &ioloejspes aneq Io MOLD' 1 pup 'plus ;SS( • 1 9NVNOdS LIO AJ.N1103 NO.I.ONIIISVM JO H.I.V.1.S uot;ezodzo0 uo ;6uTgsef e ' . DNI SSWOH GOOM3'LLSV0 L6 61 'in/ Jo Aup I -Z s!yl 1)o pap133;3 aq of puaumjlsul spp pasnea s ;y pau2lsiapun all 'LIO721711M SSHN.LIM NI •d ;aedoad e;enjad uo e;uewasu3 e6aujeap uj seeanoo e6aujeap ;o e°ueua ;ulew ao /putt uoj;Ona;euo3 ;uejO1;ep o; enp eaj;aadoad Auu o; uoj ;euwapuoo eeaenuj o; pa ;lwjj ;o1) ;nq bujpnjouj 'aaneoe;ayM e6aujeap due ao; d ;jjjgjeuodeea eta 3o1) seesaw ujejdpooj; ao a ;uawaee3 e69ujeap ujy ;jM a ;oj aqua 1)o Guano° ebuujeap eq; 6ujuja ;ujew ;0 A ITTIqTeuoduea eq; ;de0oe ;ou eeop d ;unoa euejods •;eeae;uj 1)j eloese00ne 'jog; ao 8101)140 ;oj janpjnjpuj eq; 10 eeuedxe ey; ;e p0 ;30110° ;1 snug ao °anjjul e0ueue ;ujew egg ; °8,300 01 ;g6ja ay; ouq d ;unoa eq; 'sap (oj) ua; ,a; ;e pa;ooaao0 ;ou ;I •d ;unoa eq; Aq ;ease ;1)j 0j Gaol880one ajey; 20 DIGUMO ;oj janpjnjpuj eq; 01 uan16 eq 111 e01;ou a 'mud e6aujeap penoadde egg y;jM e3uewao ;1)o° 1)j eaj ;jjj0e; e6aujeap eq; uje ;ujew 01 118; 109101ul 1)j Gaoloupons 11ag; 20 eaeumo ;01 janpjnjpuj eq; 3aneuegt •d ;unoa eue,ods ;o jenoadde aojad e1; ;nog ;1M °pew eq 1)e0 ;1)aw0003 o600j0aa ;gee ;o eejaepunoq egg ;o uoj;eOI;jpow OH •puej eq; y ;1M una Liege pu0 01 sj enogeujeaeq pagjaaeap ;uawaee3 e6aujeap eyy Return to County Engineer Right of Way Department DOCUMENT TITLE: DRAINAGE EASEMENT GRANTOR: CASTLEWOOD HOMES, INC. GRANTEE: SPOKANE COUNTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PTN. OF LOT 9 BLOCK 4, RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION ADDITIONAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ON PAGE 1 ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 55083.0409 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Spokane County, Washington DRAINAGE EASEMENT The Grantor(e) CASTLEWOOD HOMES, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION of the County of Spokane, State of Washington, for and in consideration of Mutual Benefits, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grants to The Public of the County of Spokane, State of Washington, a Drainage Easement over, under, 'and across the following described real property eituated in the County of Spokane, .State of Washington: DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOT9BLOCK4 • RIVERWALK ;FIRST ADDITION An easement for drainage over a portion of Lot 9, Block 4, Riverwalk First Addition, as recorded in Book 23 of Plats, Pages 3740, in the Spokane County Auditor's Office, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 9; thence N.60 °00'02 "E. along the north line thereof a distance of 45.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence S.29 ° 59'58 "E. a distance of 17.00 feet; thence N.60 °00'02 "E. a distance of 30.00 feet; thence N.29 °59'58 "W. a distance of 4.00 feet; thence N.60 °00'02 "a a distance of 19.00 feet; thence N.29 ° 59'58 "W. a distance of 3.00 feet; thence 5.60 ° 00'02 "W. a distance of 34.00 feet; thence N.29 °59'58 "W. a distance of 10.00 feet; thence 5.60 °00'02 "W. a distance of 5.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. Drainage Easements, an described hereinabove are for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted to the public. The County of Spokane io hereby granted the light of ingreee and egress to all Drainage Easements adjacent to the public right of way. The property owner shall maintain the drainage area with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage area as indicated by the approved plane. The Grantor will construct the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plane on file in the County Engineers Office. The individual lot owners or their Dunceseore in interest shall maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the Engineers Office. The property owner or his representative shall inform each succeeding purchaser of ' all Drainage Easements on the property and his responsibility for maintaining drainage facilities within said Drainage Easements. PAGE -1- 1. cmi Wu ?''v o1,1ignn Oulplsa ;'uolJulfls8M lu1S att 1 pun ul aggnd AJeloN • ... Gs ii> + a ss fl •luammisul am ill pauopuaw sasodind pun sasn at {l Jot /Shed flans Jo ion FJmunlon pun aaJJ 9L11 aq of •DMI 'SaWOH UOOM2ILSVD Joaueby pazT.ToggnV alll Se 11 pa2palmoct>lan pun manumit! am alnaaxa oI pazpofllne sent (aqs/arI) 1 palms Oleo uo 'luaw nJesul snp pawls (at {s/aq) Imo pa2palmou lae uosiad plus pue 'aw aiojaq paneadde 011M uosJad at {l s! ° 011) aouapina AJOlaejspes anvil() MOII) 11e £Jl1Ja0 1 HNV01OdS :JO A.1.N(100 NO.LDNIHSVAI :10 L.I.VJ.S uoTlezodzop U046UTI1SeM e ' .ANT S3W0H 0OOM3'IJ,SVD L6 61 lfy'ytr?flj Jo XuP J - 61 () uo palnaaxa aq of ptaumJlsul slgl pasneo suq pau8lsiapun am '_I0=R17IIM SSHN.LIM NI •dlaedoad elenTad uo equawaee3 e6euieaa 01 seexnon aBeujexp ;o oaueuelulew ao /pun uoTlonxlauoo luslaT;ap of enp eaTlaadoad hue o1 uo5leuwapuo0 aexenuT 01 Pa1TmIT aou 1nq 6ulpnTouT 'laneoelegm ebeuleap Aug ao; A1TTlgTeuodses egg aou 'eeaae useTdpooT; ao eluaweee3 ebeuTera ulglln ego" olenlad uo eeznoo e6euleap egg BuTuTeluTew ;o d1TTTrusuodeea eq1 1daaoe aou poop dlunoa euVMods •le°aequj uT ea08ee0One rlegl ao aaeuno 101 Tenpin egg ;o eeuedxe egg 1e paloaaaoa 1T envy ao eanITe; eaueuoguTew egg lo°aaon o; ;g6Ta egg eeq dlun°p egg 'edep (oT) uol aag ;e palaeaaoo 1ou ;I 'dluno3 eya Aq geeaeltT uT eaoueeaane ape°, ao aaeuno ;QT TenpTnTpuT aql 01 uUAT6 eq TTTn °pilau a 'ueId eBeuTera panoadde eq1 q;1% 020ewx0 ;u03 uT earn -Flom; 0600 egg uleaulew oa flu; leaaaluT uT eaoseaoone aTagl ao aaeuno loT TenpTnTpuT egg aaneuegM •A;unop euegods ;o 1enoadde aolad 641 lnoglln °pew eq uea luawaeeg oneuTesa pTee ;o eaTaepunnq aiyl ;o uo =lgol ;Tpow ON •pueT aµ1 gl7n una - Liege pue 01 eT anogeulaaoq pagfaaaap luawaeea a6euT eso alts. con Return to County Engineer Right of Way Department DOCUMENT TITLE: GRANTOR: GRANTEE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ADDITIONAL ASSESSOR'S DRAINAGE EASEMENT CASTLEWOOD HOMES, INC. SPOKANE COUNTY PTN. OF LOT 9 BLOCK 4, RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ON PAGE 1 TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 55083.0409 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Spokane County, Washington DRAINAGE EASEMENT The Orantorte) CASTLEWOOD HOMES, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION of the County of Spokane, State of Washington, for and in Benefits, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grants County of Spokane, State of Washington, a Drainage Easement the following described real property situated in the County Washington: DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOT 9 BLOCK 4 RIVERWALK P'IILST ADDITION An easement for drainage over a portion of Lot 9, Block 4, Riverwalk First Addition, as recorded in Bobk 23 of Plats, Pages 37-40, in the Spokane County Auditor's Office, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 9; thence N.60 °00'02 "E. along the north line thereof a distance of 45.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence S.29 °59'58 "E. a distance of 17.00 feet; thence N.60 °00'02 "E. a distance of 30.00 feet; thence N.29 °59'58 "W. a distance of 4.00 feet; thence N.60 °00'02 "E. a distance of 19.00 feet; thence N.29 ° 59'58 "W. a distance of 3.00 feet; thence S.60 °00'02 "W. a distance of 34.00 feet; thence N.29 °59'58 "W. a distance of 10.00 feet; thence S.60 °00'02 "W. a distance of 5.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. consideration of Mutual to The Public of the over, under,' and across of Spokane, .State of Drainage Easements, as described hereinabove are for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted to the public. The County of Spokane le hereby granted the light of ingress and egress to all Drainage Easements adjacent to the public right of way. The property owner shall maintain the drainage area with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and .percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage area as indicated by the approved plena. The Grantor will conetruct the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plane on file in the County Engineers Office. The individual lot owners or their successors in interest shall maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the Engineer° Office. The property owner or his representative shall inform each eucceeding purchaser of all Drainage Easements on the property and his reeponeibility for maintaining drainage facilities within said Drainage Easements. PAGE -1- 2f��6 pt ' utRgui";'��I 2ulplsat ' uol2unlseM LI a S It .1 ptte u1 °wind XleloN )1- Ie- I' , NiEla 0�,dyi I Ills 44, llll 'luatunilsul all) ul pauopuatu sasodind pus sasn atp .oj ,(lied gaps Jo iou XTelunlon pus aatj 9111 aq- 01 'DMZ 'SaWOH QOOM3'IISVD Jntuaby pazrnotllny 9 se 11 pa2palmou)lae pus luautnflsul alp alnaaxa 01 pazpotpne SEM (2115 /311) Imp palsls 111eo uo 'luaunulsal snp pau2ls (atis /at) imp pa2palmotnpe uosiad pies pus 'aut mpg paleadde 011m uosiad atp sl imp aauapina AID108Jspes anetl JO MO111 1 W AJlliaa 1 ; SS( 9NVNOdS dO .I.LNf103 NO.I.DNIIISVAI dO 11.I.V.LS uoTleJOdloD U0;6UTt1SEM e "DNI sawou QOOM3'ISSVO L6 6I / tritlj Jo duP i Z uo palnaaxa aq 01 ptautnjlsul slip pas se p t alp `d0H21AIlM SS9N.LIM NI 51 41 •Agaedoad egenlad uo eguawaeus e6eujeaq uj sesanoa ebeujeap ;o eoueue:ujew ao /pue uojgwnageuoo 4ueToT ;ep o4' enp ealgaadoad .Cue og uofeuwapuoo ()eaanuj o4 pe1jwIT 4ou tnq bujpnjoul 'aenaoegvyn ebeujeap due 30; dgjjjgTeuodsea e111 sou 'eveav ulejdpooj; ao e4uawaeeg e6eujeaq ujygIM egoj elenjad uo eeanoo ebvujvap egg 6ululagulew ;o .t jjjgjeuodoaa 041 gdaooe 4ou soup A4uno0 eueModg 4400103ul uj oaooeeonne aTegq 20 eaeuMO 40j jenpjnjpul 041 ;o eeuedxe 044 ge peloeaaoo lT eney 20 eanjje; eoueuegujew eyg 40eaao0 og gg6ja 041 eey A4uno0 egg 'sAep (0T) ue4 sag ;e p0430a200 4ou ;I 'A4uno0 eyg Aq 7eeaeIuT uI eao0e000ne alegl ao eaeuMO 4oj Tunpjn1pu7 eyg 01 uanj6 eq ITTM 0Oj4ou a 'um 060uleap penoadde eyg yIIM 000ewae ;UOO uj e01411j00; 06euje4p 044 uje4uje0 04 TT e; 4eaaa4ul uj ea0eeeoan0 91914 ao 010UM0 goj TenpjnMpuj eyg aeneueyH •A4uno0 euetods ;o jenoadde aojad 0114 4noy4}M ()pew eq 1e0 4uow0oeg o6001010 pies ;o eojaepunoq 044 ;o U0i4e0j ;jp0w 011 •puej 044 44jM una jjege pug 04 el onogeuleaey pagj300ap quewooua e6eujeaq eqS TO: CbtkATT srvicA Purpose O Information Written Approval Remarks • INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -6844 it/1 to ./ ,4 41' !a ny2q /7741.--vin A9 d� /0)-1 /yt D Review & Comments Cl Signature & Return . kr t1 DATE la. I D.E. PROJECT #• cu, t f1(n zi sheh toc ATTENTION: 9-?C`)`-k- M j Cd p � �IECT NAME I' I t^ a Cr s o Description Ca � r Q • "" e g 7 0 Xerox Prints C r 14: 0 Original Drawing CI 9 uments 0 Work Authorization 0 1 No. Copies Description l ry ,P 0,0 � 01 If V etiu.t Lk / 9, See_, A 4 ( int/a2,61) Per Your Request .._ - t_._ ___" c11261.2-444.9, 1 Rr. Pahl f rtt$ Z i 1997 SP nt(E Nr r ^.u�•n. 1 Signed cc: DSTANSMT.PMS RIGHT OF WAY TYPE B CURB & GUTTER BACK OF 6' SIDEWALK PROPERTY EXIST. 13' UTILITY LINE & DRAINAGE EASMT SCALE: 1" =20' 45' PROPERTY UNE 9 PROPOSED EASEMENT L M. 2GP LOT 9, BLOCK 4 RIVERWALK 1 ST ADDITION EASEMENT ADJUSTMENT \ INDIANA AVENUE EXIST. DRAINAGE EASEMENT N6000'OT E N6000'02" E TRACT " D" S60'00' or W EXIST. DRAINAGE EASEMENT 4.00' N29'59'58" W RETAINING WALL DATE: 10/22/9§/ _ 19.00' n N60'00'02"E I N29. S. POND BOTTOM i'EDESTRIAN RAMP n Fr- m DRYWELL EDGE OF ASPHALT RIGHT OF WAY 16' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT 2 707 West 7th • Suite Spokane, WA 99204 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 200 (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -684 Page 1 TO: FROM: DATE: PROJECT: FILE #: Review Date: Sponsor /Applicant: Section Township Range: Planner: CC: Applicant Engineer /Surveyor Planner RIVERWALK PE- 1414 -81 OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 (509)477 -3600 Fax (509)477 -2243 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" EXTENSION OF TIME Spokane County Planning Division 4� Division of f EngineeriBring g & Ro ads Q ds � June 9, 2000 06/07/2000 CLC ASSOCIATES 08 -25-45 JAMES RICHARDSON The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order /Decision" should the request be approved. Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: 1. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and drainage plans, a drainage report and road and drainage calculations that conform to the 1999 Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction and the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management. Final road and drainage plans shall also comply with all applicable state and federal laws that may be applicable to this project. Final road and drainage plans, related calculations and a drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a construction or building permit or approval of the final plat. Following plan acceptance by the Spokane County Engineer, drainage language will be drafted by Spokane County and provided to the Sponsor's Engineer or Surveyor for inclusion with the final plat document. 2. If the project is phased and one phase depends on another phase for access and /or drainage treatment and disposal, the prior phase shall be completed and certified prior to the submittal of plans for the dependent phase of the development. One foot no access strips on public roads will not be released until the subject phase is completed, certified and accepted by Spokane County for maintenance. No access through a non certified and non - accepted phase of the development may be allowed and no plans will be accepted by Spokane County for construction unless the prior phase is completed and certified by the Sponsor's Engineer. 3. As per Section 9.14.080 of the Spokane County Code, no person shall construct a road or other facilities within the existing proposed, or future public right -of -way, or the private road easement in connection with the actions enumerated in Section 9.14.020 without out first having received a permit as specified in Section 9.14.070(1) for such facilities from the County Engineer. Said CLC ASSOCIATES JAMES RICHARDSON Page 2 1914 permit will not be granted until the plans for the development have been accepted by the County Engineer. If this provision is violated, the County Engineer may decide to not accept a bond for the improvements and may require the project sponsor to build and certify the facilities prior to final plat. 4. This proposed subdivision or development proposal is located within a drainage basin that has been identified by the Spokane County Engineer's and Utilities offices as having stormwater runoff problems. Since this proposed subdivision or development proposal is affected by or is a contributor to stormwater flows, property owners should participate in the planning and implementation of a future basinwide stormwater management system. The following statement shall be placed in the plat dedication: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to join in any County- approved stormwater management program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fixed through public hearings for service or benefit obtained by the planning, design, constructing, maintaining or operation of stormwater control facilities." 5. The Spokane County Engineer has reviewed the extension of time and will require that the proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 99 -0265, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 6. All previous imposed County Engineering Conditions of Approval are still applicable. END Kimball, Sandy From: Hemmings, Bill Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 9:53 AM To: Engelhard, Scott Cc: Kimball, Sandy; Parry, Ed; Sims, Brenda; Miller, Katherine; Darrell, Virginia; Richardson, James Subject: PE- 1414 -81 - Time Extension Request 5 -26 -00 I recommend the following conditions of approval for the above referenced time extension request. Bill Hemmings, PE m P- 1414 -81 - Time Entension for Riverwalk Page 1 • PROPOSED PLAT CONDITIONS FOR RIVERWALK SUBDIVISION TIME EXTENSION P-1414-81 May 26, 2000 1 recommend the following plat conditions for the above referenced plat: 1. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and drainage plans, a drainage report and road and drainage calculations that conform to the 1999 Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction and the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management. Final road and drainage plans shall also comply with all applicable state and federal laws that may be applicable to this project. Final road and drainage plans, related calculations and a drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a construction or building permit or approval of the final plat. Following plan acceptance by the Spokane County Engineer, drainage language will be drafted by Spokane County and provided to the Sponsor's Engineer or Surveyor for inclusion with the final plat document. 2. If the project is phased and one phase depends on another phase for access and /or drainage treatment and disposal, the prior phase shall be completed and certified prior to the submittal of plans for the dependent phase of the development. One foot no access strips on public roads will not be released until the subject phase is completed, certified and accepted by Spokane County for maintenance. No access through a non certified and non - accepted phase of the development may be allowed and no plans will be accepted by Spokane County for construction unless the prior phase is completed and certified by the Sponsor's Engineer. 3. As per Section 9.14.080 of the Spokane County Code, no person shall construct a road or other facilities within the existing proposed, or future public right -of -way, or the private road easement in connection with the actions enumerated in Section 9.14.020 without out first having received a permit as specified in Section 9.14.070(1) for such facilities from the County Engineer. Said permit will not be granted until the plans for the development have been accepted by the County Engineer. If this provision is violated, the County Engineer may decide to not accept a bond for the improvements and may require the project sponsor to build and certify the facilities prior to final plat. 4. This proposed subdivision or development proposal is located within a drainage basin that has been identified by the Spokane County Engineer's and Utilities offices as having stormwater runoff problems. Since this proposed subdivision or development proposal is affected by or is a contributor to stormwater flows, property owners should participate in the planning and implementation of a future basinwide stormwater management system. The following statement shall be placed in the plat dedication: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to join in any County- approved stormwater management program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fixed through public hearings for service or benefit obtained by the planning, design, constructing, maintaining or operation of stormwater control facilities." all Wenimat9 4. PE • • TO: S P o K A N E PLANNING Enclosures — MEMORANDUM FROM: James Richardson, Associate Planner DATE: May 24, 2000 RE: Proposed Extension of Time for Riverwalk; PE- 1414 -81 1026 W. BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 - 0220 ('HONE: (509) 477 -7200 • FAX: (509) 477-2243 • TDD: (509) 477 -7133 RECEIVED / MAY 2 4 2000 C o u NSRiswfit[1UNiYENGINEER A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Gary Oberg, Director (Division. of Engineering and Roads, Transportation (Scott Engelhard, c /o_ Sandy_ Kimball Division of Engineering and Roads, Development Services, Bill 1 Lemmings Division of Utilities, Information Services, Jim Red Division of Utilities, Stormwater Utility, Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District, Steve Holderby Spokane County Fire District No. 1 Consolidated Irrigation Distrct Enclosedfirid a-eopy of the :application for an extension of time for the plat/PUD /rezone named-Riverwalk (formerly Riverway Villa). Please review and forward any comments to me by June 7, 2000. If you have any questions you may contact me at 477 -7168. copy w/o enclosures: C & L Development, LLC; 802 West Rosewood; Spokane, WA 99208 CLC Associates: 707 West 7'" Avenue( 4200); Spokane, WA 99204 RCCER ED `-iPOK4NE COUNTY'- MAY 1P, 7nnn DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING NAME OF PLAT/FILENO: Riverwalk/PE- 1414- 81/PUDE- 1- 82/2E -92 -81 APPLICANT (NAME OF LEGAL OWNER): C & L Development L.L.-C. MAILING ADDRESS: 802 W. Rosewood CITY: Spokane STATE: WA ZIP: 99208 PHONE: (work) 325 -4865 (home) (fax) IF APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR THE BELOW OWNER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE OWNER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT: CLC- Associates, Itic. c/o Brockr:Materner. MAILING ADDRESS: 707 W. 7th Ave. CITY: Spokane STATE: WA ZIP: 99204 PHONE: (work) 458 -6840 (home) (fax) 458 -6844 1. Has any portion of the plat, short plat or BSP been finalized (recorded)? Yes. Riverwalk 1st through Riverwalk 10th. 2. Has a proposed fmal plat, short plat or BSP been submitted to the Division of Building and Planning? Yes X No - If no, why has the plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized? What has been the delay? 3. What progress has occurred: What conditions of approval have been completed (such as survey work, improvements constructed, departmental approvals obtained)? Riverwalk 1st through 10th have been finalized and constructed. Page of Apprication for Extension of Time 5. Is this a phased project? Yes X No No of lots originally approved: 365 No. of lots remaining to be finalized: 20 ADDRESS 802 W. Rosewood CITY: Spokane EYT OF TIME REQ/CVTC /5 -99 au! SIGNATURE Page 2 of 2 Application for Extension of Time 4. Why the plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized? What has delayed finalization? If yes, please complete the following information: No. of phases finalized to date: 10 No of acres remaining to date: 5± LEGAL OWNER SIGNATURE (Signature of legal owner or representative as authorized by legal owner) �; I li ri SPOKANE COUNTY D / . L i/ , (print name) SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE AB E RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. PHONE: 325 -4865 STATE: WA ZIP: 99208 - /8-OC7 DATE NOTARY STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this / p day of .taco • NOTARY SIGNATURE Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at: d^"r lil.44 My appointment expires: 3 t,/ ZOtZ DATE SUEMII LED: AMOUNT RECEIVED. RECEIVED BY: RECEIPT NO. Page 1 •' TO: FROM: DATE: PROJECT: FILE #: END CC: Applicant Engineer /Surveyor Planner OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 (509)477- 600 Fax 477 -2243 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" EX E ION OF TIME Spokane County Planning Departmen of Engineering & Roads J May 17, 1999 RIVERWALK PE- 1414 -81 / ) Review Date: Sponsor /Applicant: Section Township Range: Planner: ED DEAN INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING LOUIS WEBSTER 05/18/1999 (05/06/1998) ED DEAN 08 -25-45 LOUIS WEBSTER The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order /Decision" should the request be approved. The Spokane County Engineer has reviewed the extension of time and has no objection to granting an extension of time. • RECEIVED MAY 0 6 1999 [It ' ll *H3 ` SPOKANE CAUMyRatg S P 0 1< A N E a ti? c C O U N 7" BUILDING. AND PLANNING James L. Manson, C.B.O., Director • MEMORANDUM A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Gary Oberg, Director TO: , Spokane'County Division-of- Engineering and =Roads Spokane County Division of Utilities Spokane Regional Health District Spokane County Division of Building & Planning, Jeff Forry Spokane County Park, Recreation, & Fair Fire Protection District No. 1 Consolidated Irrigation District Central Valley School District No. 356 Washington State Department of Transportation PROM: Louis Webster, AICP, Associate Planner t/(- ,' DATE: May 4, 1999 Vv SUBJECT: Extension of Time for PE- 1414- 81 /PUDE- 1- 82/ZE- 92 -81, Riverwalk The Spokane County Division of Building & Planning has received the attached request for an Extension of Time to finalize the preliminary plat of PE- 1414- 81/PUDE- 1- 82/ZE- 92 -81, Riverwalk. If you have continents on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should be made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to me by May 18, 1999. f Thank you. kb c: Ed Dean Inland Pacific Engineering Stanton- Spokane L.P. Riverwalk 50 L.L.C. Wel Co. Group, c/o H & EI Property Pacific Properties K.C. Construction Enclosure 1026 W. BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0050 PHONE: (509) 477 -3675 • FAX: (509) 477 -4703 • TDD: (509) 324 -3166 • 1. Stanton - Spokane L.P. 16720 N.E. 116 Street Redmond, WA 98052 2. Riverwalk 50 L.L.C. 16720 N.E. 116 Street Redmond, Washington 3. Shorewood Homes 3901 Schreiber Way Couer D'Alene, WA 83815 4. Pacific Properties 14410 Bel Red Road Bellevue, WA 98007 RIVERWALK PRELIMINARY PLAT OWNERSHIP r . 1 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & PLANNING EXTENSION OF TIME APPLICATION FILE NO.: PE- 1414- 81 /PUDE 1 -82 ZE 92 -81 NO. OF LOTS: 365 Lots Owner: SEE ATTACHED SHEET Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: Fax: Applicant/Sponsor: Inland Pacific Engineering Address: 707 West 7th, Suite 200 City, State, Zip: Spokane, WA 99204 Phone: 458 -6840 Fax: 458 -6844 Surveyor: Pat Moore, Inland Pacific Engineering Address: 707 West 7th; Suite 200 City, State, Zip: Spokane, WA 99204 Phone: 458 -6840 Fax: 458 -6844 I . Has any portion of the plat, short plat or BSP been finalized? (Recorded with the Auditor) Riverwalk 1 throught 7 and Riverwalk 9th have been filed with the Spokane Auditor's Office 2. Has a proposed final plat, short plat or BSP been submitted to the Division of Building and Planning? Ycs XX _ No If no, why has the plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized? Riverwalk 8th is waiting for WSDOT Approval and will be filed in the next few weeks. The area between Riverwalk 9th and Riverwalk 5th is being reviewed for potential design. 3. What progress has occurred? What conditions of approval have been completed (such as survey work, improvements constructed, departmental approvals obtained)? Riverwalk 1st through 9 Additions are constructed and Complete with some work being completed on Riverwalk 8th Streets. Ibis now brings the total of approximate) 318 lots completed of the 365 lots . Riverwalk 8th will hP cnmplPtPd within the.next month to six weeks. Preliminary design is being looked at on the area between Riverwalk 9 and 5th. No contract has been submitted for this protion of the project. 4. Is this a phased project? Yes xx No If yes, please complete the following information: No of lots originally approved: 365 No. of phases finalized to date: 8Phases No of lots remaining to be finalized: 47 Lots No. of acres remaining to date: 26± Acres 4 / V ATS ATE art PLEASE SUBMIT THIS FORM ALONG WITH THE REQUIRED TIME EXTENSION FEE TO THE DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING ?"7 s aRr y r +iC�r is v, rN>f ><t?F r.Mi ;rl• ✓!W'3i n 1 ' 6 S.i {a'W rni. , DATL SUOMITICb'2. . ,t{, I_.' tK�l..7:.1 rt� ED GT OF TIME REQRJSo 7 8. E SIGNAT OF OWNER OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON May 17, 1993 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Current Planning_ Administrator) FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SU6J: EXTENSION OF TIME, PE 1414 -81 / Riverway Villa re: Subdivisions We have reviewed the above referenced Extension of Time request. The following comments are applicable to the request. The County Engineer has reviewed the referenced Extension of Time request. The folowing comments are applicable to the request. The County Engineer has reviewed the extension of time and has no additional comments to add other than those conditions of record as as ammended. When detailed drainage and road plans are submitted they shall comply with the Guidelines for Stormwater Management and Spokane County Road Standards as amended. Additionally, per the original conditions of approval: . "A traffic analysis of each phase will be required of the developer and reviewed by Spokane County prior to plat finalization. This analysis will be coordinated with the State of Washington Department of Transportation. A traffic analysis for each phase will serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Should the analysis determine a need for intersection upgrading, the developer will be assessed a proportionate share for the required improvements." Prior to any plat checking of Riverway Villa for phased finalization of the plat the aforementioned analysis shall be completed. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Spokane County Engineer Spokane County Utilities Spokane County Health District Spokane County Department of Buildings Spokane County Parks Department Fire Protection District No. 1 Consolidated Irrigation District Central Valley School District WA State Department of Transpgrtation Thomas Veljic, Planner I April 20, 1993 Extension of Time for PE- 1414 -81 RIVERWAY VILLA Please direct any written response to Thomas Veljic. Thank you for your prompt attention. APR 2 0 1993 C o iu?9fr i irlattulFEEr PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLIS D. 1 DIRECTOR The Spokane County Planning Department has received additional information which would allow granting an Extension of Time for PE- 1414 -81 Riverway Villa. The Planning Department would like to update all conditons of approval. Please review your files and provide a list of all conditions which would apply to this subdivision. Please forward comments to us by May 4, 1993. If you have any questions please contact me at 456 -2205. c: Trinity Enterprises, 2128 North Pines Road, Suite 17 -9, Spokane, WA 99206 John Clardy, P 0 Boz 762, Deer Park, WA 99006 North Idaho Engineering, 4200 West Seltice Way, Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 WEST W26 BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0240 • (509) 456 -2205 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON December 12, 1991 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Current: Planning Administrator) FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Vt- • SUB.]: EXTENSION OF TIME, PE 1414 -81 / Riverway Villa re: Subdivisions We have reviewed the above referenced Extension of Time request. The following comments are applicable to the request. The County Engineer has reviewed the extension of time and has no additional comments to add ether than those conditions of record as as ammended. ,ti SPOKANE COUNTY COURT NOUSE TO: 1P NTEP111 CAI) 1111 Spokane County County Engineer Spokane County Utilities Spokane County Health District Spokane County Department of Building & Safety Fire Protection District No. 1 Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19 Central Valley School District No. 356 WA State Park Department & Recreation Commission Spokane County Parks Department BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET MEMORANDUM FROM: Paul F. Jensen, Senior Planne DATE: November 26, 1991 SUBJECT: Extension of Time for Riverway Villa, PE- 1414 -81 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PHONE C56 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 i ti J n NOV 2 61991 5 �: LA L�41 t LhU7t4EEit j ti The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached request for an Extension of Time to finalize the plat of Riverway Villa. If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditio ui b e n ad - .a part o I e preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to me b December fl9 fl'nn'r. T.i?'J Thank you. kc c: H & E Investments, 5503 Broadway, Spokane, WA. 99212 Enclosure 1 I. City, State, Zip: Spokane, WA 99212 Phone No: 534 -5531 PPJ3,II SNAllY PLAT EXTEO ICn OF TIME FOFJ1 Plat Number: PE 1414 - 81 Plat Name: Riverway villa Number of Lots: 387 Number of Acres; 118 Sponsor; H & E Investments Property Owner: H 8 E Investments Address: 5503 Broadway Address: E. 5503 Broadway Engineer. /Surveyor: Inland Pacific Engineering Co., Inc. Address: S. 25 Alt.amont City, State, Zip: Spokane, WA 99202 Phone No: 535 - 1410 See Attached Letter. *xx *x * * * * *x* PHASED PPY_LTECT ('ID BE COMPLETED ONLY IF THE PLAT IS BEING DEVELOPED AND FINALIZED IN PHASES) Number of lots originally approved: 387 Number of phases finalized to date: Number of lots remaining to be finalized: 387 Number of acres remaining: 118 City, State, Zip: Spokane, WA 99212 Phone No: 534 -6531 0 PLEASE PROVIDE Us WITH THE FOLLOWING IN.WURIATI0\ Briefly summarize the progress made, to date, in preparing the plat to be finalized (i.e., physical construction, bonding for improvements, surveying and drafting work, accomplishing various departmental requirements, obtaining or granting easements, etc,) October 23, 1991 Sincerely Richard L. Mason • INLAND PACIFIC E GINEERING CO., INC. South 25 Altamont Street Mr. Wallis Hubbard, Director Spokane County Planning Department M. 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99260 Spokane, Washington 99202 (509) 535-1410 Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Environmental Analysis RECEIVED OCT 2 8 1991 P.02 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: Riverway villa, PE1414 -81 Extension of Time Dear Mr. Hubbard: This letter is submitted on behalf of H & E Investment, sponsor of the referenced project. In late 1989 we received an extension of time on the referenced project to allow time for negotiations with the State of Washington concerning the location of the Centennial Trail through our site. The existence and route of the trail obviously will have a major impact on the design of our project. When we began negotiations with the State in October 1989 we anticipated that the Centennial Trail issues could be resolved within a"few months, however negotiations actually extended over nearly two years and were brought to a conclusion with an agreement executed within the past several weeks. The final agreement necessitates revisions of a portion of our project. Additionally, we have been working with the County Utilities Department to evaluate the possibility of connecting our project to . the County sewer system rather than utilizing an interim community system. The feasibility of such a connection to a large degree depends on the extent and location of interceptor lines the County chooses to construct in 1992 -93. Because the Centennial Trail issue was only recently resolved and requires redesign of our project; and because the final decision on 1992 -93 sewer construction projects has not yet been made, we respectfully request that we be granted a two year extension of time to get our project underway. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON November 17, 1989 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Current Planning Administrator) FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SUBJ: Time Extension Request PE 1414 -81 Riverway Villa PE- 1208 -85 Nc'rthcrest Addition re: Subdivisions We have reviewed the above referenced Preliminary Plat Files. We have no additional conditions of approval to add. OFFICE OF T}IE COUNTY ENGINEER • Ronald C. Ilarsnann, P.E., County Engineer - 7TH IDAHO EndINEERING 20866 - 07 10 P.02 PRIORITY FEE / A ( GGREEMENT y / / ENGINEER'S AGREEMENT NUMBER / / �- -- This agreement betwee whose interest in the project is 5. The monthly billing should be sent to the attention of: NAME: SrePNra: 2:bevaa.oritnir ADDRESS: )4 70 ' N• t . Ne; '' S'rrear CITY, STATE: fr"feDie/ p i/.b b-14 A D:vistoN or ME PUBLIC Wotua DEPAMMENr beats M. Scott, P.E., D Spokane County and Sr. ,.r rand Lt vezo°wit - A/r Co. isms se person o rivele -L A6, rNt of O W � ct `.e. owner, agent' alai is entered into this err/ day of dcrveee —, 19 5L . This agreement is applicable to the project known as: ten/ ! g t) Onyl l n• Or Ot menaN4 et nla onoirro) That the individuals and parties named herein as having an interest in the above described property or project agree to the following: _ 1. They request that priority review be given to their project. • 2. Reimburse Spokane County for project review and inspection fees as specified in Chapter 9.14 of the Spokane County Code. The fees will be based on double -time cost incurred by Spokane County for project reviews plus ten percent administrative charge, and will be billed monthly as accrued. Any final billing amounts, to include any late fees or any other expenses incurred in the collection of an overdue account must be paid prior to the County's acceptance of the project for fling. 3. The undersigned agrees that these fees are due and payable upon receipt of the billing as specified above. 4. Any invoices not paid within 30 days of the invoice date will be subjected to a late fee charge of 1 %u per month (12% per year) on the unpaid balance of the account and any accrued late fee charges. In addition, if any outstanding balance on the account for this project is not paid within 30 days of the invoice date, no further reviews of the project documents will be conducted until the entire account balance is paid. Any balance on the account for this project not paid within 65 days of the invoice date may result in legal action or the initiation of other collection procedures, including referral to a collection agency. The Sponsor will be liable for any and all expenses incurred by the County for the collection of overdue accounts. ZIP CODE: 980 PHONE #: (a06) sG ? - �. 1 understand that failure to pay these fees may result in delay in completion or approval of the project or other possible sanctions. d If this fee agreement is completed by someone other than the Sponsor (i.e., the project owner or a principal in the firm sponsoring the project), such as the Engineer designing the project, then written authorization from the Sponsor specifically authorizing the Agent to exeeute this Fee Agreement is attached to this Fee Agreement. SIGNATURE By: Str -r-r ev D Pg. t- -e - (PRINT NAME) RETURN PINK COPY TO SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS t'e'Pprlwity.raa 5/20,9) W. 1026 Broedwav Ave. Snnkana. WA 99)60-017n l.Sn91 -7bM PAY NAM 4 n7rc known as: OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer PRIORITY FEE AGREEMENT ENGINEER'S AGREEMENT NUMBER - P 14 ' 4 This agreement between Spokane County and whose interest in the project is R 1 .0 (project address ADDRESS: CITY, STATE: ZIP CODE: PHONE #: W. 1026 Broadway Ave. D 4 - 0 N i✓L__ (I.e. owner, agent, etc.) is entered into this 3 1 day of k21A U - - - . 1 - - . Illellatne & ilia number) A DIVISION OFTr1E PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director (name 01 person) .5 u �y°o ACA-art L , {�' , 19 e l 7 . This agreement is applicable to the project Thai the individuals and parties named herein as having an interest in the above described property or project agree to the following: 1. They request that priority review be given to their project. - 2. Reimburse Spokane County for project review and inspection fees as specified in Chapter 9.14 of the Spokane County Code. The fees will be based on double -time cost incurred by Spokane County for project reviews plus ten percent administrative charge, and will be billed monthly as accrued. Any final billing amounts, to include any late fees or any other expenses incurred in the collection of an overdue account must be paid prior to the County's acceptance of the project for filing. 3. The undersigned agrees that these fees are due and payable upon receipt of the billing as specified above. 4. Any invoices not paid within 30 days of the invoice date will be subjected to a late fee charge of 1% per month (12% per year) on the unpaid balance of the account and any accrued late fee charges. In addition, if any outstanding balance on the account for this project is not paid within 30 days of the invoice date, no further reviews of the project documents will be conducted until the entire account balance is paid. Any balance on the account for this project not paid within 65 days of the invoice date may result in legal action or the initiation of other collection procedures, including referral to a collection agency. The Sponsor will be liable for any and all expenses incurred by the County for the collection of overdue accounts. 5. The monthly billing should be sent to the attention of: NAME: 5 (_5 /A72o // C R•4 L 11\--22 J - FS? _GG / (PRINT NAME) RETURN PINK COPY TO SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS k\pUlpriority.fce 8/20/93 I understand that failure to pay these fees may result in delay in completion or approval of the project or other possible sanctions. ❑ If this fee agreement is completed by someone other than the Sponsor (i.c., the project owner or a principal in the firm sponsoring the project), such as the Engineer designing the project, then written authorization from the Sponsor specifically authorizing the Agent to execute this Fee Agreement is attached to this Fee Agreement. SIGNATURE By: S Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 (5091456 -3600 FAX (5091 456 -4715 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208) 664 -3507 To: Nortlidaho Engineeri j Inc. Spokane County Engineers Development Services Attn: Ed Parry Ref: Riverway Villa We are transmitting The Following Drawings Calculations Report Letter Maps Check $ Plans X See at Right Call immediately Call after review X Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Regd. Review /Comment No action Regd. TRANSMITTAL Date: 6/6/94 Job no. 4004 Herewith Separate Cover Prelmu. . Via Mail In Progress Delivery Revised Personal Pickup Final Fedex As -built Approve, UPS For Payment Your Use Other Partial Other Specific Items: Agreement to pay fees. • James 0. Morris Please Message: !01210 jCEIVED JUN 0 6 1994 E 000411 ENGINEER known as: (project actor OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER • Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer ENGINEER'S AGREEMENT NUMBER This agreement \N( �Q_�-1 Pt-1 �J ��,� or Llename & ale number NAME: ADDRESS: CITY, STA ' : ZIP •ODE: P ONE #: AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES between Spokane County and 1 \ S C\ (name of person) ( I whose interest in the project is 0.c. owner, agcn , etc � s entered into this 1 day of S. .19 This agreement is applicable to the ptojcet That the individuals and parties named herein as havi an interest in the above described property or project agree to the following: 1. Reimburse Spokane County for proje r. w and inspection fees as specified in Board of County Commissioner' es9 yt .n 80 -1592 attachment C, as amended. The fees will be based on actual s la /co s incurred by Spokane County for prdjel t reviews and / or inspections p s . t n percent administrative charge, and will !b 0 VE 0 billed monthly as accrued. 2. The undersigned agrees tha th- fees are due and payable upon receipt o'f the billing as specified above e monthly billing should be sent to the attentior! ef:, L,cy ,: �.c IyEE 1 under and that failure to pay these fees may res other possible sanctions. SIGNATURE By: \ C-.v t A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director C -- ∎-ve C.)P 4N% �°t L OCG (PRINT NAME) RETURN YELLOW COPY TO SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS k(gNagrecmen.ree 3/ 9`• 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 -0180 (509) 456 -3600 FAX (509) 456 -4715 FEB 01 1993 val of the project or t ;ij t CS. W 1 1. . ; , ,f,yy y „„��,, v N N. h n '1 (`;` n vh f , ' ? i ? c7* 4 2 ,0 %. y� Qs�. 1" t . , 5 CD0 t - 1 br RECEIVED FRO I r y It vv N �V rrw• v (} v 4 ,� �.�i 11 c: y, 1. � Y Y .'.ii',{".{1f43, 02 D 1 `.{1 lW :K A+41.1gle0• f t;(M .G r h °.' '. 44 yr; ,nctlgt J � - . S 71jC 2stiCtl -t-�t n h I . ( Y1/411Y Y - -.._ 1 4 a ,,,n,..../...* :d ��'1.1(h ;:M$Jhh N: rt:+f !`f!Q.T [ ti : � ^` �S{L; {'T! / '�M� �.'':'�fi ;i(HNHh fi 1 ei H aNhN4 PN11N1( 9. 'I 4 T N . "11, 91 Y `Ntply 7 .1' ^'LZ4?.N '1 NORTH '0 ENGINEERING 601 SHERMA NUE SUITE 2 667 -1171 :- D' GENE :IDAHO- 83814 r — - fir-: ..4 .T r . g' • ra 7/C1 7 .' 1T � . - -$ /IOC • IL Bank orAmerica ";M - r 622 East Sherrnen Avenue, j rt , ft, - - 'r i + .1-,44.,. . . Caeca a Alene I0 63814 .,;. `Y - v .m ::.1 ,.Coeur r f --e\1-1 4. 1R .. «,.. _-r+ r ... -, es .wr..' •-t +.»..t Tt ^r4. .+1 ,n.l.:,.+ . .'.,�. . .,, AI0 000;L 3 0aLi _P y u: Li2'3 L0;32ar'' 24 70 9 , 2 L9n' 1_ - "44"...',.4 ,„..r...w...:fr..".a. fit:.:.- 7.f.....a4 1. vt DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer August 28, 2000 United Pacific Insurance Company C /O: Marsh Ms Lois Stuart Box 2151 Spokane, WA 99210 RE: Maintenance Bond Number B2824398 for Residential Construction of Riverwalk 1st Addition (P1414) / Dear Ms Stuart: A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Please be advised the Maintenance Bond Number B2824398 dated June 8, 1999 issued by your company as surety for a maintenance bond for the above - mentioned plat in the remaining current amount of 99,350 00 may now be released in full effective immediately Riverwalk 1 Addition Roads have been established and the warranty period has expired This final release should close out the above referenced maintenance bond If you have any questions, please call me Sincerely, Bill Hemmings, PE Development Services Engineer/Manager cc: Sandy Kimball Randy Stronks File 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 • (509) 477 -3600 FAX: (509) 477 -7655 (2nd Floor) 477 -7478 (3rd Floor) • TDD: (509) 477 -7133 MAINTENANCE BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we STANTON - SPOKANE LP as Principal, and UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a held firmly bound unto SPOKANE COUNTY as Obligee, in'the full and just sum of NINE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED FIFTY AND NO/ 100ths ** Dollars (S9,350.00 _ .. . . ). far the payment of which sum, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administra- tors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the said Principal entered into a contract with dated /49.'L L0 1999 for RIVERWALK 1st ADDITION INDIANA AVENUE MAINTENANCE FOR ROAD SYSTEM AS A PUBLIC ROAD WHEREAS, said contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of ONE (1) year(s) after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the owner, against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period, and WHEREAS, the said contract has been completed, and was approved on APRIL 20, 1999 - NOW; THEREFORE"THE- CONDITIQN OETHLS-ORLI GAT - ION -IS SEJ€H, -tha: it withirrONE (1) year(s) from the date of approval of the said contract the work done under th terms of said contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said contract, or it shall appear that detective materials were furnished thereunder, then thls obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void. - Signed and sealed this Witness: Pennsylvanitiorporation, as Surety, are SPOKANE COUNTY 8th day of JUNE , 1999 STANTON - SPOKANE LP Bond No. B2824398 Prindpa1 UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY B Z'2i'4 /(cK -rte PAMELA NELSON Aanmer -in -Fact IOOCUMENTLHAS]ATCULOREDIBAC KGRO.UN RE IANC U R A N E COMPANW w a� v ir.4.0 h7 o`?ikt:oa'<' sz Pr he a ' UREUTANCE NATIONAL`INDEMNITY COMPANY r > t �z a °r t 1 LSrt "' i s � 'tn ) b , -3 5. e o ff, tW HlT REIIIANCE COMPANY r,"4, 9.^Fg' 1r`� y tMntYi`M1"�tfli nJfM1t-, L. UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCECOMPANY f �•�� 1 jj � r - �. ) i ' a5 (, a 1 {. I1 O';1‘111711.t. �' �3`'A1 4 f {! i5` Q W I t 4"x'S MVTwY 6 i . -0 4, r p ` 4 + y x} y � .•• 111 ot7 ADMINISTRATIV� � FF � I ICEIPHILADELPHIA'fPENNSYLVANIA +' �a' : -�. Y' t hu�:1k "� .4k s�*a4sG. fi }� r r" Y °' 1 ? POWER�OF 3 q' m ;) C �Ya> r'xa sI '� w � E i ,p r r 4' j: . O "'` Y '1 ihir - -:nk - ,9 d "�:` ii. ..F' L a€;&&:, Y '. KNOW ALL` MEN BYaTHESE PRESEN t ANCEISURETX CMPAN?is a corporahon,dulyorga ze l md undertws of the State ofDelaware w'• s r r r TS hat REL - r "'.. ▪ +ha ?J-e la ; v- h cr land tha1�RELIANCErINSURANCE /COMPANYyand„�UNITED;PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY are �corporatlons : �.duly y organfzed, s un_der the laws of� _T Commonwealth^. of Pea nsyl vamal"and fha RELIANCEft4ATIONAL INDEMNITY�(COMPANY li aNirp uly orga , nized i ndekili laws f o tre.State of -. Wi nsin (herein colleGlvery•called ,the�Co mpaniies ) ( and that thef Companies ` b w rtue a of; s ignature anneals do hereby make nstdute and'appoini S us a n B'fLar TIr Ch Jr h't'P amela Dean `natM�MeyerrCynthia Ja NetWnwi R Peter''HeHammett�John NF Zefkelos d Victor rha and s ,,E ° ParkercCindy ' Vlllasistarif Seattle Washington, their te rOts nd lawful Alt P o ney(s) -in F t ma sines theeebb I ' d nY� d a t nd fo the same ee d a thei aG, and deed a and l al bonds an uertakin of su s> y- - n r ot lr d nd h t n nat1 d e �slg 1 anExe P ce pa - 1 and )f suctiTbond jand. ' js her wnbngg th ure here t of weren ed�by _ cutive � Offic�er oflthe +Compmasfand sealed � an' attested by one other 0,1110 'offiaerscand hereby ratlfie5and cnfirms all that their said Atforn in Fact" - ma te y do in pur u a` hhereof 1l 1J &&'.,It ;`* p r ry I ' '�`v ,( , — .q -e""' t . k ,_ 7 1A<'r'VYY[L `� !.._ 9✓� w�ir sue,, s { y �{1 y Ih & L ' „ .Thy Power oC Attorney Is,granted'underand by thelauthonty�of ArUGe�Vl�ofaheyBy y Laws of RELIANCE_SURETYrCOMPANY ~RELIANCE.. INSURANCE COMPANY'tUNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANYa and RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY which provision ? re,now in. itiaCiice and efrect readln as fo lows c v iwPoq v �F,. r x >, t v 1," -g '. z: 7 1 Lw'Y..� A 2 - 4,iir 0 DSA a h � ) ' v A .a. �'I t f •fie ^ �.� y ARTICLE VI EnECUTIOH OF BONDS A D U :YINGS + 1) �• p,'{ = - S ' ft . 7t � yy - b e F l K i ' m T "f The a Py n - �a'�" d- c an 'P P rees,dcra 11 ■ e dent rAs i f sont i i"-g "`s. _ a/-. -_ p e.f! T ^ ,The '0urn Daedmn the ll) m Ftc the chairman of de Bosrd, an na be V ec Prs m . Vee Presider' en krn m VpeProufe .raIs or mdcr dslgrused by,'We pm?d of nlmcm shall r r e r � power. and amhalry m ( il appom/ Ano re nc (/})o-Fact eM to ewborim /Wem m ea t o 0o brbalr author lye Company ?bons eM uvdmakitigafreio 'dm of isidemiury and Other vny oblignoryie the intern mereorta d (b) to remove any sold Attmrcy(s) ii.Faa at , e iniii aM make Ile paver and author i [. ty y r f iv v e � n to thbnl en n C , A). . 4 9, .. '!y r rJ f $9, n•,: a a , .. t. 1. « *r ¢ i{ U fP. " S ' � A�'i'. }t a�&rM h � «� C'a r s % t• 3?e` '" L ° nee c 9 '6 "�4Vti.(4t. 2 LAtinrn`yo a ad Wall ba a power and aadmauy subled to d Icon and Hoot om of the Pow of Amm�ey issued 0 Nam m execute and deliver Oil behalf of the Company binds and tdmaklnrgs recognlam contra of rtdemm ad ot hc worm obligvu in tie nmure of i ibc corpo ra¢ sN a o mzsvey re valdby ta b aticud Idcrukmp recegnouw rmntr ciCof ,NcmmT and ah w I,Ya roin abI stmt 1 1 " i ! I` b' S�py t 1 _� b the _ _ sr.. I 1 y. I : �'lV1y 1, ray " th e , Y r � 51 �N` �- G A`I a n ,� 4 $ •a ~ a-. ' �� f � � (ik Y t P c (I ac 1u ,4 bW * Sel 1 a. r y or l 4 1 or stor er eW' � n vi y '^ , n ' ;Ayr to i iIy Nve power a wln o m caeavm ay.** ,9. r pin of m M ana wi o m , C n y veiny e; comae Ions[ ry o M o �I gatmy Id 1 111 � eld Ney dull have paws and a m w fy he,fumleol sutemem o t e Company and tempts of dr y 1� f the Company y article c section Iheeof 1y 1 p 1 � $ '1 i a c iv ic y t� Tr,s,x s a,�-� ] �er y s � u � 4 ' ` I Hn J S x, 7 s ig n ed 2 C'y �i YF-1'". under. < 7 tni' .Yn`ra1'Fdv E xec hie r4 F T ar e Zot + , m xr f €if ;?rti cc Ly. ',This d P . , of Attorney usumd u soled by fn wnde std by m NOnry of follo na imons Co eo d ado o e t the E 8:11 4 a cid by t ee Coenve e an of de B ,C. an Duuor ' f ail Im liOiS fovpanc - -. U ud: Pic fie Immaas Company, al }Winne }Winne National or Mary Indemnity Company by Um moo Cmoec dared u` of Ftt 2r 11994' A by IM Executive and Ftmad Comm nx f the ao - o D - . of Irelwsce . 1s iii /CanOanr Ulum Cortadoled u 4- tayla� t} e � n ,:. me- he it 1}} r+� C„ c - Y=; dW � �I f }t' AY"f,Ri .A. m 1 2 • � c te t l ' ' T c h LYFrr N1'I1lMca,"isA N iMT v r� s `h s VIles617.4 dm the signenn:ellif stich'directors and of Bents Stile ` N . '; f 1 Power � ,s.' llOilKtu` ter sold bar' • rig upon the C'snpany o ar; rune s b l chi m valid .m d b,ndm ertalu C n ny a n t t u !� a - 14h v, t P F I to c c uied and ecrufed by fat o rt s uretueti l and ? t ' /W C 4t . t ,yy�� g� gt s t . ty�+,d •�`y�itl °s'� C/s' 4' W � X [tS { ' w : is vh caul R" ese presents �' f fi n e d ari c.�+ eir,c k Sr ,h ere t ce mber 799 ?'. 'IN WITNESS. WHEREOF ?the Companles.have caused these presents to ere signed and thev.corporate seals to be hereto affixe Stile d this :Dece 3 8. -9 L .v�.ssrF ,•tom .7 ."' . ' � y y � ; �eFi -+ ° _, t v 51 s * ,' t C 7titi�ll ` yg J'I di '.t.' a�a K' it-4 at� SURETY COMPANY , , * - REGANCEIINSURANCEICOMPANY , ' UNITEDPACIFIC IN RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY)COMPANVd :In Witness Whereofil hereunto set my hand:and official seal. I STATE OF ti v4shiigton y ve ro` y ' -A ss e ; „,., a �. a ; ° lra,L « Wadsworth M p j ersonally . . eel Mark W Alsap who - -. wledgetlhlmself to be the Vice Fresidentt Insurance United Pacific Insurance Co and:Retiance'National Indemmty;Co that (f J the foregoing instrument,for the purpose therein contained s gon themame of the corporation by:tilmsetf " 9s its authonied'olllce6 R F,, ( ".d�s� - t i ��` , W " • d am , rsr 3 tea. � `� 5 i ` " .S. _ 6 ,. 5 ' . t.-1, .. ; ' ?N ..i�` r ' ^Jl" 1rsm sE ya a3_rR.. ask .- S. aryiPu6hcFln: andf �r Washingtoo t , ' I j i ��a Y ' I - Resi , up 7'. a S . ' _ m fi �� .,� fli'Rob t kofiRELAN E SURE_1y, CO NN SURAN E :COMP UN E PACI U RANC E ° COMP . y ANY yanf NATIONAL INDEMNITtCOMPANY�do her'el y certdyfttiat. the above'eas d'fo�egoing' *is a tole end orreet copy of the Poweroff 'Altorney execotedby said Companiees'SWhich ks stal m m iW , ' ' y�A.1h „1 , t?' 4. - t lr 4:25;:t : V , r 3 t"'c}f y fit Pl Y ;t , et W ,{ y 4 . r y , bT f , 1 �, �,�t G �}x :7*. S (s f r c � v + n �i.' k l s '**99 ' at # �° ,' HERE `'z :. u , I n to s t my han the se 1�!z,1pi' pa nid.vYh, ' i7UI3 E y A t 999v IN,WITNESS WHEREOF I'have,hereu Set my handhannd.aff the seals'of sai Co this tt achy of kwrx year ofbitr, w i117'y."111�nb . �" ^ d rL ' 14 '��f ,a /!n .,. } 'TASsistanl Sede� t Lirgi Q�+ hiri vo �ik."'OYO T,H EIBAC kf oFAT, RISIDOCUMENTIC ONTA'INSTNIARTIE ICIF LAWAT ,ERMARKCOOLDIAT /ANIANGLE`TakeEW AI N0 PS&F Parker, Smith & Feek, Inc. June 1, 1998 Jim Radke Engineering Services Spokane County 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 RE: Project: Riverwalk PUD 1st Addition Principal: Stanton - Spokane LP Bond No. 445636S Dear Mr. Radke: We are in receipt of a copy of your letter dated May 1, 1998 to Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. accepting the construction certification for the Riverwalk 1st Addition. In order for the surety company to close Stanton - Spokane's bond file, they need an exoneration of Subdivision Roadway Improvement Bond No. 445636S. Please sign below acknowledging exoneration of the bond. You can return the signed acknowledgment to me in the enclosed, self- addressed envelope. If you have questions, please call. Thank you. Sincerely, PARKER, SMITH & FEEK, INC. Pam Nelson Surety Account Administrator Enclosure insurance Brokers Surety Bonds Rim €. fit: (1 7 D JUN u 3 ;x:98 sPoKAHE `liG!idEEA 999 Third Avenue/Suite 1700 Seattle, Washington 98104 -4091 206/382 -7900, Fax 206/382 -1135 Alaska Office: 4000 Old Seward Highway, Suite 200 Ancho agc, Alaska 99505 -6067 907/562 - 2225, Fax 907/561-2504 Acknowledged: SPOKANE COUNTY By: 1 Date: J u.ay 42, /Q4t )( .. eeccivoo Witamery etr o 9 PAy So gis4D G4W W4-M/ fi tsc& j& Employee Benefits Personal insurance DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer May 7, 1999 Mr. Edward Dean, President Stanton Spokane L.P. 16720 N. E. 116 Street Redmond, WA 98052 RE: Bond Release for Riverwalk 1st Addition and Warranty Bond - P -1414 Dear Ed: Spokane County accepted Indiana Avenue for maintenance and inclusion in its road system as a public road on April 20, 1999. We need to release your performance bond number 445636S from Indemnity Company of California that is currently in force on this project and replace it with a Warranty Bond. The Warranty Bond should run from April 20, 1999 for a one year period in the amount of $ 9,350.00. 1 am enclosing a copy of a bond form we have accepted for a warranty bond. As soon as we receive the warranty bond, 1 will fax Indemnity Company of California with a bond release authorization. If you have any questions, please contact me at 509 -456 -3600. Thanks Sincerely, k- • Bill Hemmings, PE Development Services Engineer /Manager cc: Bond File A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 51.25 _c'69— (C -�2o Ai / r-, Drf 5 /7/ ?? 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 477 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 May 7, 1999 DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Mr. Edward Dean, President Stanton Spokane L.P. 16720 N. E. 116 Street Redmond, WA 98052 A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RECEIVED JUL 1 2 1999 SPOKANE COUNT! c'si ACM Gd RE: Bond Release for Riverwalk 1st Addition and Warranty Bond - P -1414 Dear Ed: Spokane County accepted Indiana Avenue for maintenance and inclusion in its road system as a public road on April 20, 1999. We need to release your performance bond number 445636S from Indemnity Company of California that is currently in force on this project and replace it with a Warranty Bond. The Warranty Bond should run from April 20, 1999 for a one year period in the amount of $ 9,350.00. I am enclosing a copy of a bond form we have accepted for a warranty bond. As soon as we receive the warranty bond, I will fax Indemnity Company of California with a bond release authorization. If you have any questions, please contact me at 509 -456 -3600. Thanks Sincerely, Bill Hemmings, PE Development Services Engineer/Manager cc: Bond File 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 477 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 After Recording Return to: Spokane Cpunty Engineer Attu: Engineering Administration , RESOLUTION NO. 99 0317 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF ESTABLISHMENT ) OF INDIANA AVENUE RIVERWALK 1' 2 AND 6 ADDITIONS ) COUNTY ENGINEER'S ROAD FILE NO. 2659 ) No Assessor's Tax Parcel Number Assigned - Public Roadways RESOLUTION - ESTABLISHMENT This being the day set for the hearing on Spokane County Engineer's Report on the proposed establishment of INDIANA AVENUE, proceedings for which were initiated by PRELIMINARY , RESOLUTION NO. 99-0229, and it appearing to the Board on proof duly made that Notice of Hearing was published and posted in the manner and for the time required by law, and the Board after examining herepot evidence n maps of the Spokane County Engineer and all claims and papers on file and after hearing adduced at the hearing; and IT FURTHER APPEARING that the rights of way have been dedicated as public road 60 feet wide, and that said road is a public necessity and the same should be opened and established as County road. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, that the hereinafter described road as reported by the Spokane County Engineer on the 20th day of April, 1999, being more particularly described as follows: INDIANA AVENUE - 60 foot wide right of way, from the east right of way line of Barker Road easterly to the westerly line in Riverwalk 6 Addition. Located in the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 45 E.W.M. and as shown by the records and maps on file in the Office of the Spokane County Engineer be and the same hereby is established as County road and the same shall be known as INDIANA AVENUE, Road File No. 2659. The road supervisor of the road district in which the said road is located is hereby directed to open and maintain the same for public use and travel. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the one foot strips described as follows are hereby dedicated for public road purposes: Tract "I" in Riverwalk 1" Addition No. 1414 Lot 2 Block 4 in Riverwalk 2n Addition No. 1414A Page 2, Establish Indiana Ave..- RF 2659•' April 20, 1999 99 0317 APPROVED BY THE BOARD this 20th day of April, 1999. O M. KATE ' c AS CHAIR JO OSKELLEY,VICE -C Al ATTEST: VICKY M. DALTO CLERK OF THE BO • DANIELA ERICKSON, DEPUTY 1 \v \res \cst \rt265 indiana BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SP' • N' CIIUN WASHINGTON RRIS KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that (developer), as "PRINCIPAL," STANTON- SPOKANE L.P. and INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA BONDING COMPANY CALIFORNIA a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of and authorized to transact a surety business in the State of Washington, as "Surety," are held and firmly bound unto Spokane County, a political subdivision of the.State of Washington, as "Obligee," in the penal sum of TWENTY -EIGHT THOUSAND AND NO /100ths ** Dollars($ 28,000.00 lawful money of the United State of America, for the payment of which the Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, said Principal is the developer of a tract of land in Spokane County divided and platted into lots and known as RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION and being located in Section 8 Township 25 North, Range 45 E.W.M., in Spokane County, Washington, and said Comity has required that a bond be furnished in an amount sufficient to pay the construction cost of grading and surfacing to the approved grades and typical section of the roadways of said plat and the installation of drainage structures and such other work as is incidental and necessary thereto, all in accordance with those Plat Roadway Improvement Specifications dated JULY 5 19 95 and to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Engineer; such improvements to be completed two (2) years or Icss time unless • said time period be extended at the option of the Spokane County Engineer. Upon failure of Principal to comply with the requirements stated herein within the time authorized, and upon delivery of written notice thereof by Obligee to Surety, the Surety shall make satisfaction to Obligee to the extent of this Bond. The obligation of this Bond shall be.kept in full force and effect until, in the opinion of the Obligee, the requirements herein stated have been satisfied, in which event written release will be given by the Obligee, the Obligee having sole right to grant stick release. Surety hereby waives all rights to release from the obligation except as herein stated. SIGNED AND SEALED this 3rd day of NOVEMBER , 19 97 BONDING COMPANY: Address: City, State: Zip Code: Phone #: PRINCIPAL rwne.,rwune SUIIDIYISION ROADWAY 1Ml'ROVENIENT BOND - SPOKANE COUNTY By: Title: INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA 999 3rd Ave., Ste. 1700 Seattle. WA 98104 382 -7900 Bond No. 4456365 Spokane Co Engineer File p CYNTHI L. JAY, ATTORNEY -IN -FACT U STANTON- SPOKANE L.P. (developer): Address: 16720 N.E. 116th Street City, Stale: Redmond, WA Zlp Codc: 98052 Phone p; 425/869 -6618 6.31 FIX 6(09- ‘0.0 POWER OF ATTORNEY OF ' Ir.JEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORA AND DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY P.O. BOX 19725, IRVINE, CA 92623 • (714) 263 -3300 NOTICE: 1. All power and authority herein granted shall In any event terminate on the 31st day of March, 1999. 2. This Power of Attomey is void it altered or if any portion Is erased. 3. This Power of Attorney is void unless the seal is readable, the text is in brown ink, the signatures are in blue ink and this notice is in blue ink. 4. This Power of Attorney should not be returned to the Attorney(s)-in-Fact, but should remain a permanent part of the obligee's records. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that except as expressly limited, INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY, do each severally, but not jointly, hereby make, constitute and appoint * * *Lawrence.J. Newton, Peter H. Hammett, Cynthia L. Jay, Cindy E. Paulsen, Carl Newman, Tim Church, Susan B. Larson; Marsha Clesson, Pamela Nelson, jointly or severally * ** the true and lawful Attorney(s)-In-Fact, to make, execute, deliver and acknowledge, for and on behalf of said corporations as sureties, bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship in an amount not exceeding Three Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000) in any single undertaking; giving and granting unto said Attomey(s) -In -Fact full power and authority to do and to perform every act necessary, requisite or proper to be done in connection therewith as each of said corporations could do, but reserving to each of said corporations full power of substitution and revocation; and all of the acts of said Attorney(s)-In-Fact, pursuant to these presents. are hereby ratified and confined. This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolutions adopted by the respective Board of Directors of INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY, effective as of September 24, 1986: RESOLVED, that the Chairman of the Board, the President and any Vice President of the corporations be, and that each of them hereby is, authorized to execute Powers of Attorney, qualifying the attomey(s) named in the Powers of Attorney to execute, on behalf of the corporations, bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship; and that the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary of the corporations be, and each of them hereby is, authorized to attest the execution of any such Power of Attorney, RESOLVED, FURTHER, that the signatures of such officers may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or to any certificate relating thereto by facsimile, and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures shall be valid and binding upon the corporation when so affixed and in the future with respect to any bond, undertaking or contract of suretyship to which his attached. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY have severely caused these presents to be signed by their respective Presidents and attested by their respective Secretaries this 3rd day of February, 1997. INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA By B STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE By 10-313 REV. (3/97) Walter Crow Secretary V 9 Vinoenti, Jr. Y sident y )SS On February 3, 1997, before me, Shede L. Bell, personally appeared Dante F. Vincenti, Jr. and Walter Crowell, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her /their signatures) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. The undersigned, as Senior Vice President of INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, and Senior Vice President of DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY, does hereby certify that the foregoing and attached Power of Attorney remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore, that the provisions of the resolutions of the respective Boards of Directors of said corporations set forth in the Power of Attomey, are in force as of the date of this Certificate. This Certificate Is executed in the City of Irvine, California, this INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA LC. Rebiger Senior We President DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY By ATTEST By CERTIFICATE Dan F. Vincent Jr. resident Walter Crowell Secretary 3rd day of NOVEMBER 199 DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY N9 026906 LC. Fiebiger Senior Vice President SHERIE L BELL COMM. 11119419 NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA ORANGE COUNTY My Cann, Exp. Dec 12, 2000 * DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Enterprise Bank 11225 S.E. 6 " Street Bellevue, WA. 98004 Dear Sir or Madam: RE: Riverwalk 1 add P1414 Stanton Development Company • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director November 4, 1997 Please be advised that the Set Aside Funds No. 01- 402981 issued by your company as surety for installations of roads and associated drainage facilities for the above mentioned plat, dated July 24, 1995 in the current amount of $28,000.00 may now be released. If you have any questions, feel free to call our office Very truly yours, Bill Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer al David A. Berto Plat Compliance Surveyor 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane. WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer December 9, 1996 Enterprise Bank 11225 S.E. 6th Street Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Addition Stanton Development Company Gentlemen: • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director Please be advised that the Set Aside Funds (No. 01- 402981, dated July 25, 1995) issued by your company as surety for the installation of roads and drainage facilities on this project, in the current amount of $76,700, may now be reduced to $51,000 (Fifty-One Thousand U.S. Dollars). If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, William A. Johns, P. E. Spokane County Engineer £a4 ? Edward J. 'y, Jr., P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: project file reviewer Stanton Development Company (Mark Hancock) 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 G00_ECT: ORA NAPE 1IE1.15 WITS 040arry PRICE 1 1750.0 D P y 1 - Typo EA Ea 5 135000 A 6.t. Rpm 1r 10' C44. -p7 l EA 315.00 516.1. y 1 FA 4 340 .03 510•.1. 'Tv . . 4 3 ]0.00 194311 0.1 eu0 For cr 1 . Ow CY 46 0 10.25 '4 7) Coda 043 r. OW EA ]460 0.25 T U 13 4 7.50 03 01 . IF 27'03 obi W. I2' 0 4 .. CYP IF 72 40.00 ¢ w I 15 G.. CMP IF %2.l 00 51 O 4000 1L1 Mw I8' Di.. CMP IF 4 31.50 12 P 10' .. U 31.50 12) Ps 84 3 510. .13.134133 EA 1310.00 13) ed.w u CI 00 14.4) E.M.\. GI 5464, CY 140 10.03 Women Cy 0 10.00 1440 Er04v \ - CY 0 10.00 CY 0 IO.m 1518 SF 0.70 101 1.135....4 Wiens SE 17501 0.02 181.... SF 0 0.07 HON STANDARD (RAMAGE LIENS 11 W15.11 Y401 CUE Hw n r u.4.m%. is Wyn.'. Wad • 355 IF Lwow Ma\ Wu • 332 IF 4 415rg4un 4Ynm • Win. We LI Wwwn own - /.113W3 A WI 5044343 Is' 10) K...n..4 111 84.4.6 IOI So.n So.. BONO ESTIMATE P1414. 05..+15 13 Wawa 44 51 213.4 1 11 EA 41 01140140. SURFACNO. CURB, AND S:OEWALF • •Sa., b. • Rawl Ave 1018428140..4. 2Q Top Cow.' 2110... Caws. 111 4.11: 0343 231 Cub two A 247 Cub Typo B 251 Cue Type O 265 Sd..15 ••Nicm A.. 105 Roug3 04.314. 701 Top0... ed Caws 211 B..' Cau.' 273 A. ly Cow.. 150 Cub b Tyw A 24) Cub Tap. B 251 Cub Type 0 20) S.1444814 DMMAOE 519TOTAI. OTHER SLUTOTSI CY 2680.7 CY 1010.4 CY Taw 1071.3 60 LF 15570 0P 50 60 1705.2 CY Cr Tow cr. LF IF LF F 5420 0440440 4140 SUFFAC440 054x0 TOTAL 883254 Sum WNW.. wauctian Caen 534114 DATE 0-0a.0e 607 03 15CO.00 5000.03 1500.00 25040 IXO,m 10.03 56.00 10.03 16.50 10.03 16.00 16.03 16.70 Waal COST 115000 p 000 003 300.03 fU3m ».50 G003 03003 Om 2404.03 172010 1723.10 Om 0.00 03.00 7400.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 O.m Iiio.m 5400 00 47407.07 EA e l 55.00 Illo IF 0 03.0 O.0 EA 3 65,00 255.00 1365.0 3000202 15310 4752132 20462.40 0.03 24420.64 00 138457.06 10.130 1ee.3eo.m 111.Mm 01-I4117712 PRICE COST 604575 01LNTITY 115000 003 EA 1 2 150303 3120 CO EA 3 315.03 0.03 E4 2 340.00 000.03 FA 2 3003 000 ES 3 ' m 18.0 Iimm CY 150 1301 0.25 TA.m 5Y 2203 2 750.03 1500 50 EA 2 1 03 0.00 IS 3.03 27.70 1210.60 05 45.00 40.03 Om IL 00 44 27.00 1373.20 IF 31. 003 IS 1540.03 0.03 EA 2 310.00 05000 EA 1 151 10.00 151000 CY 00 10.03 000 CY 20.1 O 1003 Om CT 0 O 10.00 003 CY 0 0.70 0.0 SF 10100 0.07 707.00 SE 7461 0.07 003 SF 1318 5000.03 2 150040 2 150.00 1500.00 250.00 155.03 AY s Pl.... 2 564..8 8.55...1 to R... 1 10.01 50.01 10.03 15.70 12158.03 003 0.03 3000 500.00 003 5 1 3 3 1 15450.0 04431500E 57260746 o.00 EA 5 155.00 1110.03 003 IF 0 a.0) 003 o.0) EA 3 5500 25500 0111EB SIOTOTAI 5364.. lour 0420 CY 2510.7 56.01 000 C1' 03.0 DECO o.02 CY u 0 0.03 T2.. 00 003 V 5.00 0.03 5 7460.3 5.00 0.03 Li 10.70 0.03 50 40 1803.1 003 CY 143 003 CY 74.5 0.03 CY 0.03 To 101.6 0.00 IF 0.03 IF 157.5 0.03 lF 0.03 5o 20 105 003 0440440 A240511PF *C140 15.55.'53 OMNO TOTAL DATE 06.0.'.80 a PRICE 1250.03 1560.00 315.03 30303 le .15 0.25 750.00 27.70 27.80 31.50 1503.00 310.0 1003 10.00 10.00 1000 0.70 0.07 0.07 7500.00 5003.03 5500.00 203.03 1503.03 250.00 10.00 16.03 10.03 e.0) 10702.40 9.03 O.m 10.10 21773_34 MOO 10.00 16.00 0057 ISO CO 4530 0.03 Om.00 pm.0 14C0 5300 15C0 0.03 2 2400 1233.93 O CO 0.03 000 0.03 310.01 201.00 201.00 Om 0 .05 Om 5303.3 07.17 750 CO 505003 4500.50 150.50 550 CO 250.02 9.03 1260,02 0.00 0.50 16.70 17 13F57.00 7._. .8144..+73 w Mr 5 84.(73 •414. 6 T..1 - swan 14 Fn.55.o Bwr..4 I 1050.03 10.035 310.03 .4 .1 150 30.07 70 1Be ao 0) 03 3751.20 08431500E 30.0101A1 1:65.0 07NE0 SLGTOTAL 25107.03 15115.40 0.40 4gpl 40 1400.03 118303 451052 152.006 T.141 031w.rey Oran $3.3 5333 I. W.S.0.0 08000 20.036 13003 000 03 20.036 180.00 34m,m 20.031 310.03 550.03 20036 110.00 5600.02 20.001 YA 050 003 5346.50 70.001 240.30 2403.00 21.001 a60.m 310.00 20.001 ezm WO.m 20.036 100.00 165.0 10 261.0 573.51 15.001 71.55 01.11 1m.006 02.11 450 CO 7500.00 45 0.03 750.03 750 20 .03 50.00 250.00 11100) 0.03 25500 25107.03 16116.5o 003 39031.40 0.40 15201.40 am 26523.33 15.031 20.036 20.036 5m.ms 103.036 100 003 100.001 IC.003 oms 100001 1400.m 107.06 1400.0 1101.00 'IC0.036 1102.00 o.00 003 4550.01 100.06 4510.02 0.03 a,0) 1 150.00 t60. 7:0301 1753.50 1C0.006 1757.50 13 457.44 22130/17 R433334 130.457.01 Pas 1 4E025.01 M .' _ 8846. 050.03 Cl-. e.'wl s50o,50 Safinw 444.3 406.01 9850 CO 003 3021.07 075.00 1933 CO 1010.03 4500.03 1500 C0 57430.54 1110.0 255.00 1355.00 10.036 2510.70 10.036 1511.84 10036 7372014 003 50.006 1520.24 003 10.033 2072,31 60075.0JI 707m.m 25774.38 c: \wpdoc \dave \memo \items OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TO: SCOTT EGGER FROM: DAVE BERTO L DATE: July 26, 1995 SUBJECT: BOND ITEMS P1414 RIVERWALK 1ST ADD The bond for, the above mention project is for the following items: 1) All the items on the approved road and drainage plans. 2) Bond has been reduced to reflect work completed. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER • Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Enterprise Bank 11225 S.E. 6th Street Bellevue ,Wa 98004 Dear Sir or Madam: RE: Riverwalk 1st Addition P1414 Stanton Development Company A D visiox OF 111E PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director July 26, 1995 Please be advised that the Set Aside Funds No. 01- 402981 issued by your company as surety for installations of roads and associated drainage facilities for the above mentioned plat, dated July 25,1995, in the current amount of $187,000.00 may now be reduced to $76,700.00 (seventy six thousand seven hundred U.S. dollars). If you have any questions, feel free to call our office Very truly yours, Bill Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer David A. Berto Plat Compliance Surveyor 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 July 24, 1995 Mr. Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer North 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 Dear Sir: ENTERPRISE BANK RE: Developer /Borrower: Stanton Development Company Our Account No: 01- 402981 Funds in the amount of $187,000.00 are being held in a special non - interest bearing account in the name of Stanton Development Company (developer /borrower), et ux, for the purpose of assuring completion of installation of roadway surfacing, including grading and gravel, storm drainage and monuments in Riverwalk Division 1 (development) in accordance with the drawings and specifications as submitted to and approved by the County of Spokane Engineer's Office on July 5 , 1995. No funds will be disbursed from this account without the prior written authorization of the Spokane County Engineer. This set aside of funds will not be revoked without the consent of the County Engineer. In the event that the completion and acceptance of the above -named improvements for maintenance by the County of Spokane are not accomplished within a period of one year from the date of this agreement, all funds remaining in the account will be forfeited to the County of Spokane upon written request by the Spokane County Engineer's Office to Enterprise Bank. It is understood and agreed that upon the forfeiture of the funds to the County of Spokane, that the county of Spokane will then undertake completion of the subdivision to be accomplished within twelve (12) months form the date of the forfeiture of funds. It is further understood and agreed that in the event of any shortage of funds to complete improvements, the County of Spokane may have recourse against Stanton Development Company (developer /borrower) named above. It is specifically understood and agreed by the parties, that in holding funds for this development, Enterprise Bank is not serving as guarantor for any additional costs incurred by the County of Spokane in the completion and acceptance of the above -named improvements. 1 Lincoln Plaza / 11225 S.E. 6th Street / Bellevue, Washington 98004 / 206 - 454-7070 / FAX 206 -455 -0497 ACCEPTED AND APPROVED this 2S day of ,TuL`/ , 199S STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY BY: ENTERPRISE BANK BY: ✓� --�-� /964-72-7 David V. Huguenin OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER BY: PROJECT P1414 RIVERWRLK 1ST ADD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Drywell - Type A @ 100/ 2) Drywell - Type B@ 100% 3) Grate - Type 1 4) Grate Type 2 B -13 @ 100% 5) Grate - Type 4 @ 100'/. 6) Backfill For DW @ 100% 7) Concrete Inlet @ 1001. 8) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. @ 100% 9) D.I. Pipe 12" Dia. @ 100% 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. @ 1007( 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. 12) Precast Manhole 13) Solid lid (Locking) @ 100% 14) Ditch /208 Excavation @ 100; 15) Hydroseeding @ 100' /. NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Filter Fabric Lining For 6 D.W. @ 100% 2) Type 2 Curb Inlets @ 1007: 3) 6" Underdrain For Keystone Wall 355' @ 100% 4) Build 332' Of Retaining Wall (Keystone) @ 1007: 16) Monuments @ 100% 17) Barricade 18) Street Signs @ 100% GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade @ 20% 20) Top Course 0 20% 21) Base Course 22) Asphalt Concrete @ 20% 23) Curb Type A 24) Curb Type B @ 20% 25) Curb Type R 26) Sidewalk 0 20% NON - STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 1) 2) 3) 4) 1ST BOND REDUCTION NAME DAVE BERTO UNITS EA EA EA EA EA CY EA LF LF LF LF EA EA CY SF LS EA LS LS DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL EA LF EA OTHER SUBTOTAL CY CY CY Tons LF LF LF SD YD QUANITY PRICE 1 1250.00 5 1650.00 315.00 4 340.00 300.00 230 16.00 4 750.00 72 27.00 60 40.00 44 27.80 31.50 1500.00 3 310.00 249 10.00 17581 0.07 533.74 203.88 214.06 511.56 341.04 6 185.00 33.00 85.00 GRADING AND SURFACING DATE 26-Jul--95 COST 1250.00 8250.00 0.00 1360.00 900.00 3680.00 3000.00 1944.00 2400.00 1223.20 0.00 0.00 930.00 2490.00 1230.67 850.00 6 900.00 5400.00 0.00 7500.00 0.00 5000. 00 47407.87 1110.00 0.00 255. 00 1365.00 10.00 5337.40 16.00 3262.08 16.00 0.00 44.40 9504.26 7.00 0.00 8.00 4092.48 8.00 0.00 16.70 5695.37 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 27891.59 USE $76,700.00 GRAND TOTAL 76,664.46 OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGIER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 9 Inter-office CC`omm unication To R"� ✓X _/� From �/ Subject A. Form 327 —C.R. or - DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Drywell - Type A 2) Drywe11 - Type B 3) Grate - Type 1 4) Grate Type 2 8 -13 5) Grate - Type 4 6) Backfill For DW 7) Concrete Inlet 3) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. 9) D.I. Pipe 12" Dia. 101 C. M. Pipe 15" Dia. 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. 12) Precast Manhole 13) Solid lid !Locking)) 14; Ditch :208 Excavation 15) Hydr•oseeding NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 16) Monuments 17) Barricade 18) Street Signs 19) Rough Grade 20) Top Course 21) Base Course 22) Asphalt Concrete 23) Curb Type A 24) Curb Type B 25) Curb Type R 26) Sidewalk NON- STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 1) 2) 3) 4) 147 INV S 62 15 47.1 W 746.0171 BOND ESTIMATE PROJECT '1414 R "ERWAL!. FtRET ADD 1) Filter Fabric Lining For 6 D.W. 2) Type 2 Curb Inlets 3) 6" Under drain For Keystone Wall 3 55' 4) LC/ltc/ 332' ofR629nw G/9// (Kr rbwe) 5) 6) GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK UNITS EA EA EA EA EA CY EA LF L` LF E;a EA CY SF EA LS I 5 EA EA CY CY Y Tons LF LF LE SG YD A ti t 2963. 15705 2390.66518 6.1.8 .2 NAME DAUE BERTO GUANIT`r' PRICE 1 1250.00 5 1650.00 315.00 4 340.00 F. 300.00 230 16.00 4 750. 00 72 27.00 60 40.00 44 27.80 31.50 1500.00 3 310.00 ,_49 10.'00 17581 0.07 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL OTHER SUBTOTAL 6 900.00 0.00 6 . 1.85.00 33.00 3 35.00 2668.7 10.00 1019.4 1.6.00 16.00 1070.3 44.40 r� 7.00 LSJI V 8.00 8.00 1705.2 16.70 GRADING AND SURFACING -DATE 03- J'.i1 -95 USE $1 E$, 300.00 COST 1250.00 /00 3250.00 /0O 0.00 1360.00 /OD 900.00 /0o 3680.00 /0 0 3000. 00 /GO 1544.00 /0U 2400.00 /00 1223.20 /6O 0.00 0.00 930.00 /00 2490. 00 /00 1'230.67 /DO 350. 00 /00 5400.00 / 7500.00 /00 Soo 0.00 /CD 0. 00 0. 0 47407. 87 1110.00 /a0 0.00 255.00 IDt 1365.00 2_687.00 20 16310.40 20 0.00 47521.3220 0.00 20462. 40 20 0.00 28476.84 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 139457.96 PROJECT P1414 RIVERWALK FIRST ADD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Drywell - Type A 2) Drywell - Type B 3) Grate - Type 1 4) Grate Type 2 B -13 5) Grate - Type 4 6) Backfill For DW 7) Concrete Inlet 8) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. 9) D.I. Pipe 12" Dia. 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. 12) Precast Manhole 13) Solid lid (Locking) 14) Ditch /208 Excavation 15) Hydroseeding NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Filter Fabric Lining For 6 D.W. 2) Type 2 Curb Inlets 3) 6" Underdrain For Keystone Wall 355' 4) BOyte/ 33a' orRe7,9mw tall/ (it'rieu.vr) 5) 6) 16) Monuments 17) Barricade 18) Street Signs GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade 20) Top Course 21) Base Course 22) Asphalt Concrete 23) Curb Type A 24) Curb Type B 25) Curb Type R 26) Sidewalk NON- STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 1) 2) 3) 4) / 147 INV S 62 15 47.1 W 746.0171 BOND ESTIMATE NAME DAVE BERTO UNITS EA EA EA EA EA CY EA LF LF LF LF EA EA CY SF LS EA LS 4 5 EA LF EA OTHER SUBTOTAL CY CY CY Tons LF LF LF SO YD 2963. 15705 2390.06518 42 QUANITY PRICE 1 1250.00 5 1650.00 315.00 4 340.00 3 300.00 230 16.00 4 750.00 72 27.00 60 40.00 44 27.80 31.50 1500.00 3 310.00 249 10.00 17581 0.07 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 2668.7 1019.4 1070.3 2557.8 1705.2 6 900.00 0.00 6 185.00 33.00 3 85.00 GRADING AND SURFACING DATE 03- Jul -95 10.00 16.00 16.00 44.40 7.00 8.00 8.00 16.70 COST 1250.00 8250.00 0.00 1360.00 900.00 3680.00 3000.00 1944.00 2400.00 1223.20 0.00 0.00 930. 00 2490.00 1230.67 850.00 5400.00 7500.00 500 0.00 0.00 0.00' 47407. 87 1110.00 0.00 255.00 1365.00 26687.00 16310.40 0.00 47521.32 0.00 20462.40 0.00 28476.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 139457.96 USE 5188,300.00 GRAND TOTAL 18e,230.83 ITEM STREET QUANTITIES PROJECT NO.- P1414 DESIGNER- DAVE BERTO ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION RIVERWALK STREET # 1 NAME- INDIANA AVE LENGTH- 1231.21 FT. WIDTH - 37.00 FT. BEGINNING STATION = 0.00 ENDING STATION = 1231.21 INTER # 1 FULL INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 28.00 SK = 0.00 RAD = 25.00 INTER # 2 T INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 28.00 SK = 0.00 RAD = 22.00 TERM # 1 : CROSS STREET INCLUDED EW 19.00 PW 19.00 SK 0.00 RAD 20.00 TERM # 2 : CUL -DE -SAC STANDARD TEMP RADIUS = 45.00 RADII = 20.00 SURFACE AREA- 51023.23 S.F. ROADWAY EXCAVATION 1.33 FT. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE 0.50 FT. CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 0.00 FT. ASPHALT CONCRETE 0.25 FT. CURB TYPE B EXISTING 85.00 FT. SIDEWALK EXISTING 56.67 S.Y. ITEM SURFACE AREA - ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE_ COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB TYPE B EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING TOTALS ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB TYPE B SIDEWALK DATE- 6/30/95 MEASUREMENT QUANTITY MEASUREMENT QUANTITY 2519.7 C.Y. 944.9 C.Y. 0.0 C.Y. 968.5 TONS PROPOSED 2400.3 FT. PROPOSED 1600.2 S.Y. STREET # 2 NAME- MISSION AVE LENGTH- 162.62 FT. WIDTH- 16.00 FT. BEGINNING STATION = 1498.97 ENDING STATION = 1661.59 ONE SIDE ONLY PWIDTH= 28.00 EWIDTH= 12.00 QWIDTH= 0.00 INTER # 1 T INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 28.00 SK = 0.00 RAD = 20.00 TERM # 1 : TAPER TAPER LENGTH = 86.30 TERM # 2 : CHOPPED 4024.00 S.F. 1.00 FT. 0.50 FT. 0.00 FT. 0.33 FT. 0.00 FT. 0.00 S.Y. 149.0 C.Y. 74.5 C.Y. 0.0 C.Y. 101.8 TONS PROPOSED 157.5 FT. PROPOSED 105.0 S.Y. 2668.7 C. Y. 1019.4 C.Y. 0.0 C.Y. 1070.3 TONS 2557.8 FT. 1705.2 S.Y. FROM ANGLE P1414 RIVERWALK 1ST ADD SECTION COR TIES AND P.O.B. PER LEGAL 7 -3 -95 D.B. AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 2000.00000 2000.00000 1 INV S 89 56 50.0 E 2615.7800 1997.59049 4615.77889 2 INV N 89 56 50.0 W 2615.7800 2000.00000 2000.00000 1 INV N 0 35 03.,0 W 2642.8600 4642.72264 1973.05484 3 INV S 0 35 03.0 E 2642.8600 2000.00000 2000.00000 1 INV N 0 35 03.0 W 873.9500 2873.90458 1991.08968 4 INV N 89 24 57.0 E 30.0000 2874.21044 2021.08812 FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST PLAT BOUNDRY AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 5 INV 15.0000 RADIAL DELTA RADIUS TAN L -ARC RADIAL RP 6 CHORD N 9 38 38.5 E 7.1028 TAN @PT N 19 52 20.0 E 8 INV N 89 23 06.0 E 245.2300 RADIAL S 0 36 54.0 E DELTA 8 15 34.0 LT RADIUS 758.0000 TAN 54.7294 L -ARC 109 .2691 RADIAL S 8 52 28.0 E RP 9 CHORD N 85 15 19.0 E 109.1745 TAN @PT N 81 07 32.0 E 11 INV S 29 56 26.0 E 12 INV S 0 00 04.0 W 13 INV S 89 56 50.0 E 14 INV N 0 03 10.0 E RADIAL S 0 03 10.0 W DELTA 89 56 52.0 RT RADIUS 20.0000 TAN 19.9818 L -ARC 31.3977 RADIAL N 89 59 58.0 W RP 15 CHORD N 44 58 24.0 W 28.2714 TAN @PT N 0 00 02.0 E 17 INV N 0 00 02.0 E 95.0000 RADIAL N 89 59 58.0 W DELTA 90 03 08.0 RT RADIUS 20.0000 TAN 20.0182 L -ARC 31.4342 RADIAL N 0 03 10.0 E RP 18 CHORD N 45 01 36.0 E 28.2972 TAN @PT S 89 56 50.0 E 20 INV N 0 02 29.0 W 50.0000 21 INV S 89 56 51.0 E 50.0200 N 89 24 57.0 E S 89 24 57.0 W 20 27 23.0 RT 20.0000 3.6087 7. 1406 N 70 07 40.0 W DIST NORTH 215.8000 686.4900 173.6000/ 10.0000 2874.21044 2874.36337 2874.56728 2881.36575 2883.99795 3641.95428 2893.02847 2706.02834 2019.53834 2019.37843 2029.37843 2049.37842 2049.37861 2144. 37861 EAST TO 2021.08812 2036.08734 2056.08630 2037.27724 2282.49312 2274.35707 2391.29351 2498.99956 2498.98625 2672.58617 2672.59538 2672.61381 2652.61381 2652.61473 2144.37842 2672.61473 2164.37841 2672.63315 2214.37840 2672.59703 2214.33257 2722.61701 TO 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 CC /NV IV 10 1010 IOC.10 C 17:!.10101010 CH107..A.:.CZII C(CC. 0107W C.5 23 INV S 89 56 51.0 E 30.0000 2409.30508 2752.61889 24 24 INV N 0 00 02.0 E 180.4200 2589.72508 2752.62064 25 25 INV S 89 56 51.0 E 215.0000 2589.52807 2967.62055 26 26 INV S 42 29 21.0 E 89.9900 2523.16899 3028.40436 27 27 INV S 59 59 58.0 E 182.5200 2431.90746 3186.47044 28 28 INV N 30 00 02.0 E 25.0000 2453.55797 3198.97065 29 29 INV N 59 59 58.0 W 102.0200 2504.56883 3110.61923 30 30 INV N 26 49 17.0 W 53.5200 2552.33101 3086.47043 31 31 INV N 49 06 28.0 E 185.4300 2673.72057 3226.64482 32 RRDIAL S 49 06 28.0 W DELTA 3 50 06.0 RT RADIUS 600.0000 TAN 20.0875 L -ARC 40.1600 RADIAL S 52 56 34.0 W RP 3066.50349 3680.21023 32 CHORD N 38 58 29.0 W 40.1525 2704.93609 3201.38978 34 TRN@PT N 37 03 26.0 W 34 INV N 52 56 34.0 E 150.0000 2795.32794 3321.09489 35 35 INV N 27 41 51.0 W 145.7300 2924.35931 3253.35909 36 36 INV N 22 41 20.0 W 149.1900 3062.00393 3195.81246 37 37 INV N 29 59 58.0 W 290.9800 3314.00141 3050.32491 38 38 INV S 60 00 02.0 W 508.0400 3059.98568 2610.34690 39 RADIAL S 29 59 58.0 E DELTA 20 05 55.0 RT RADIUS 672.0000 TAN 119.0881 L -ARC 235.7288 RADIAL S 9 54 03.0 E RP 3641.95801 2274.35254 40 39 CHORD S 70 02 59.5 W 234.5221 2979.96622 2389.89852 41 TAN@PT S 80 05 57.0 W 41 INV S 0 34 05.0 E 16.8100 /2963.15705 2390.06518 42 42 INV S 89 23 06.0 W 369.8800 2959.18692 2020.20649 43 43 INV S 0 35 03.0 E 84.9800 2874.21133 2021.07290 44 LAT & DEP - 0.00089 0.01522 44 HCLOSE S 86 38 20.5 E 0.0152 2874.21044 2021.08812 PREC = 1 TO 325957 Area = 601261.59 sq ft 13.80307 ac FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST 5 TO BLOCK 1 AND TRACT C SIDELINES AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 2881.36575 2037.27724 8 8 INV N 89 23 06.0 E 245.2300 2883.99795 2282.49312 9 RADIAL S 0 36 54.0 E DELTA 8 15 34.0 LT RADIUS 758.0000 TAN 54.7294 L -ARC 109.2691 RADIAL S 8 52 28.0 E RP 3641.95428 2274.35707 10 9 CHORD N 85 15 19.0 E 109.1745 2893.02847 2391.29351 11 TAN @PT N 81 07 32.0 E 11 INV S 29 56 26.0 E 215.8000 2706.02834 2498.99956 12 12 INV S 0 00 04.0 W 676.4900 2029.53834 2498.98644 50 50 INV S 89 56 50.0 E 83.6100 2029.46133 2582.59640 51 RADIAL S 0 03 10.0 W DELTA 90 03 08.0 LT RADIUS 20.0000 TAN 20.0182 L -ARC 31.4342 RRDIAL S 89 59 58 E RP . 2049.•,0"132 2582. 61483 52 k 51 CHORD N 45 01 36.0 E 28.2972 2049.46112 2602.61483 53 I HNl_ °F' I N 0 00 IUC. 1 0 t 53 INV N 0 00 02.:21 E 606.8200 2656.28112 2602.62071 54 RADIAL S 89 59 58 E DELTA 30 00 00.0 LT RADIUS 385.0000 TAN 103.1604 L -ARC 201.5855 RADIAL N 60 00 02.0 E RP 2656.28486 2217.62071 55 54 CHORD N 14 59 58.0 W 199.2907 2848.78162 2551.04236 56 TAN @PT N 29 59 58.0 W 56 INV N 29 59 58.0 W 80.9900 2918.92141 2510.54804 57 RADIAL N 60 00 02.0 E DELTA 76 37 32.0 LT RADIUS 20.0000 TAN 15.8023 L -ARC 26.7474 RADIAL N 16 37 30.0 W RP 2908.92158 2493.22743 58 57 CHORD N 68 18 44.0 W 24.7982 2928.08554 2487.50530 59 TAN @PT S 73 22 30.0 W RADIAL S 16 37 30.0 E DELTA 16 00 36.0 RT RADIUS 745.0000 TAN 104.7692 L -ARC 208.1733 RADIAL S 0 36 54.0 E RP 3641.94292 2274.35597 45 59 CHORD S 81 22 48.0 W 207.4967 2896.98584 2282.35248 46 TAN@PT S 89 23 06.0 W 46 INV S 89 23 06.0 W 226.5000 2894.55468 2055.86553 47 RADIAL N 0 36 54.0 W DELTA 69 30 46.0 LT RADIUS 20.0000 TAN 13.8778 L -ARC 24.2645 RADIAL N 70 07 40.0 W RP 2874.55584 2056.08020 48 47 CHORD S 54 37 43.0 W 22.8035 2881.35431 2037.27114 49 TAN @PT S 19 52 20.0 W LAT & DEP 0.01144 0.00611 49 HCLOSE N 28 04 49.9 E 0.0130 2881.36575 2037.27724 8 PREC = 1 TO 210999 Area = 101124.17 sq ft 2.32149 ac FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO BLOCK 2 SIDELINES AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 2214.37840 2672.59703 21 21 INV S 89 56 51.0 E 50.0200 2214.33257 2722.61701 22 22 INV N 0 00 02.0 E 195.0000 2409.33257 2722.61890 23 23 INV N 89 56 51.0 W 49.9800 2409.37836 2672.63892 61 RADIAL N 0 03 09.0 E DELTA 90 03 07.0 LT RADIUS 20.0000 TAN 20.0181 L -ARC 31.4341 RADIAL N 89 59 58.0 W RP 2389.37837 2672.62060 62 61 CHORD S 45 01 35.5 W 28.2971 2389.37856 2652.62060 63 TAN @PT S 0 00 02.0 W 63 INV S 0 00 02.0 W 155.0000 2234.37856 2652.61909 64 RADIAL N 89 59 58.0 W DELTA 89 56 53.0 LT RADIUS 20.0000 TAN 19.9819 RADIAL S 0 03 09.0 W RP 2234.37837 2672.61909 65 64 CHORD S 44 58 24.5 E 28.2714 2214.37838 2672.60077 66 TAN @PT S 89 56 51.0 E LRT & DEP 0.00002 - 0.00374 66 HCLOSE N 89 41 43.4 W 0.0037 2214.37840 2672.59703 21 PREC = 1 TO 137269 Area = 13477.95 sq ft 0.30941 ac FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO BLOCK 3 CAND TRACT A ARIA AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 2589.72508 2752.62064 25 25 INV S 89 56 51.0 E 215.0000 2589.52807 2967.62055 26 26 INV S 42 29 21.0 E 89.9900 2523.16899 3028.40436 27 27 INV S 59 59 58.0 E 182.5200 2431.90746 3186.47044 28 28 INV N 30 00 02.0 E 25.0000 2453.55797 3198.97065 29 29 INV N 59 59 58.0 W 102.0200 2504.56883 3110.61923 30 30 INV N 26 49 17.0 W 53.5200 2552.33101 3086.47043 31 31 INV N 49 06 28.0 E 135.4300 2640.98866 3188.84770 67 RADIAL S 49 06 28.0 W DELTA 21 34 54.0 RT RADIUS 650.0000 TAN 123.8864 L -ARC 244.8362 RADIAL S 70 41 22.0 W RP 3066.50349 3680.21023 68 67 CHORD N 30 06 05.0 W 243.3914 2851.55612 3066.77920 69 TAN @PT N 19 18 38.0 W RADIAL N 70 41 22.0 E DELTA 96 25 23.0 LT RADIUS 20.0000 TAN 22. 3778 L -ARC 33.6580 RADIAL N 25 44 01.0 W RP 2844.94236 3047.90440 70 69 CHORD N 67 31 19.5 W 29.8244 2862.95881 3039.22064 71 TRN @PT S 64 15 59.0 W RADIAL S 25 44 01.0 E DELTA 10 38 11.0 RT RADIUS 2154.8600 TAN '`200.5905 L -ARC 400.02 82 RADIAL S 15 05 50.0 E RP 4804.10512 2103.60714 72 71 CHORD S 69 35 04.5 W 399.4541 2723.61955 2664.85702 73 TAN @PT S 74 54 10.0 W RADIAL N 15 05 50.0 W DELTA 80 57 41.0 LT RADIUS 20.0000 TAN 17.0700 L -ARC 28.2609 RADIAL S 83 56 29.0 W RP 2704.30985 2670.06618 74 73 CHORD S 34 25 19.5 W 25.9677 2702.19893 2650.17789 75 TAN @PT S 6 03 31.0 E RADIAL N 83 56 29.0 E DELTA 6 03 33.0 RT RADIUS 435.0000 TAN 23.0226 L -ARC 46.0023 RADIAL S 89 59 58.0 E RP 2656. 552 2217.60761 76 75 CHORD S 3 01 44 t E 45.9809 2656...o231 2652.60761 77 TRN@PT S 0 00 02.0 W / / � 78 80 81 82 FROM INV b m WW mlt.m w RADIAL N 89 59 5/iya. W DELTA 89 56 53c1LT RADIUS 20:0000 TAN 19.9819 L~ARC 31.3978 RADIAL S 0 03 09^0 W RP CHORD S 44 58 24.5 E TAN@PT S 89 56 51.0 E INV S 89 56 51.0 E INV N 0 00 02.0 E BLOCK 6 SIDELINES AUTO INVERSE ***** START 34 INV N 52 56 34^0 E 35 INV N 27 41 51.0 W 36 INV N 22 41 20"0 W 37 INV N 29 59 58.0 W 83 INV S 60 00 02.0 W RADIAL N 29 59 58.0 W DELTA 90 00 00^0 LT- RADIUS 20"0000 TAN 20^0000 L-ARC 31.4159 RADIAL G 60 00 02.0 W RP 84 CHORD TAN@PT 86 INV RADIAL DELTA RADIUS TAN L~ARC RADIAL RP 87 CHORD TAN@PT RADIAL DELTA RADIUS TAN L-ARC RADIAL RP 89 CHORD S 26 41 34.5 E TAN@PT S 37 03 26^0 E G 15 NN 02^0 W S 29 59 58"0 E S 29 59 E N 60 00 02.0 E 13 40 15^0 750^N0m0 89.9023 178.9508 N 73 40 17.0 E S 23 09 50.5 E S 16 19 43.0 E G 73 40 17.0' W7~ 20 43 43.0 LT 600.@000 1@9.7343 217.0695`' S 52 56 34^0 W BLOCK4 SIDELINES AND TRACTS D & B AUTO INVERSE ***** START 92 INV N 29 59 58"0 W RADIAL N 60 00 02.0 E 1/u^"JImW CY/7.3/Cu1 28,2714 8N^020N 130.4200 LAT & DEP 0.00628 0^01184 HCLOSE N 62 04 28.2 E 0.0134 2589.72508 2752.62064 PREC = 1 TO 147342 Area = 122750.87 sq ft 2.81797 ac ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST 2704^93609 3201.38978 150"0000 2795.32794 3321.09489 145.7300- 2924.35931 3253.35909 149^1900 3062"00393 3195.81246 217.9800 3250.78121 3086.82429 120.0000 3190^78231 2982"90066 28"2843 117.2100 2686,96067 178.5266 2897.82014 215"8876 LAT & DEP -0"00422 0.00123 91 HCLOSE S 16 17 03.2 E 0.0044 2704.93609 3201.38978 PREC = 1 TO 301796 Area = 76270.60 sq ft 1.75093 ac ERROR:Invalid Command: pr'. FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST 117.2100 2479"37211 2459"37212 2459.29880 2589.7188@ 3173.46161 3l63"46178 3061.95437 3066^5m772 2704"94032 3@36"95479 3138.46220 xOD*.OmoO, 10 ?672,60589 2672.58756 2752.60753 2752^60879 2992.90049 2975.57989 3034"18391 2384.66122 3104.40998 3680.20899 3201"38855 79 80 81 82 25 TO 34 35 36 37 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 34 TO 2990.88239 92 2932.27838 93 UL L I H 70 1011) 1(11(,1. 1I L I RADIUS 20.0000 TAN 20.0000 L -ARC 31.4159 RADIAL N 29 59 58.0 W' RP 3128.46236 2914.95777 94 93 CHORD N 74 59 58.0 W 28.2843 3145.78297 2904.95794 95 TAN @PT 5 60 00 02.0 W 95 INV S 60 00 02.0 W - 298..0400 2996.76547 2646.84628 96 RADIAL S 29 59 58.0 E DELTA 6 31 37.0 RT RADIUS '745.0000 TAN 42.4799 L-PRC 84.8679 RADIAL 5 23 28 21.0 E RP 3641.95801 2274.35254 97 96 CHORD S 63 15 50.5 W 84.8220 2958.60575 2571.09264 98 TAN @PT 5 66 31 39.0 W RADIAL N 23 28 21.0 W../ DELTA 96 31 37.0 LT RADIUS 20.0000 TAN 22.4187 L -ARC 33.6943 RADIAL S 60 00 02.0 W RP 2940.26072 2579.05882 99 98 CHORD S 18 15 50.5 W 29.8486 2930.26089 2561.73822 100 TAN @PT S 29 59 58.0 E 100 INV S 29 59 58.0 E 65.2100 '2873.78706 2594.34267 101 RADIAL N 60 00 02.0 E DELTA 12 34 07.0 RT RADIUS 435. 0000 TAN 47.9038 L -ARC 95.4232 RADIAL N 72 34 09.0 E RP 2656_29071 2217.61951 102 101 CHORD S 23 42 54.5 E - 95.2320 2786. 59682 26 32.64399 103 TAN@PT S 17 25 51.0 E RADIAL S 72 34 09.0 W DELTA 87 48 41.0 LT RADIUS 20.0000 TAN 19.2503 L--ARC 30.6520 RADIAL S 15 14 32.0 E RP 2792.58790 2651.72557 104 103 CHORD S 61 20 11.5 E 27.7389 2773.29144 2656.98358 105 TAN@PT N 74 45 28.0 E RADIAL S 15 14 32.0 E DELTA 10 48 42.0 LT RADIUS 2104.8600 TAN 199.1841 L -ARC 397.1854 RADIAL S 26 03 14.0 E RP 4804-10883 2103.61537 106 105 CHORD N 69 21 07.0 E 396.5963 2913.14187 3028.10420 107 TAN @PT N 63 56 46.0 E RADIAL S 26 03 14.0 E DELTA 84 59 16.0 LT RADIUS 20.0000 TAN 18.3227 L -ARC 29.6663 RADIAL N 68 57 30.0/ RP 2931.10950 3019.31987 108 107 CHORD N 21 27 08.0 E 27.0205 2936.29043 3037.98626 109 TAN@PT N 21 02 30 W RADIAL N 68 57 30.,, E DELTA 8 57_26.0 LTA HHUlUS /IOW. �[IICIVIII v TAN 54.2317 L -ARC 109399 RADIAL N 60 00 02.`6 E RP 109 CHORD N 25 31 14.0 W TAN @PT N 29 59 58.0 W 109.3285 2686.95769 3036.95181 2384.66257 2990.88374 LAT & DEP 0.00298 - 0.00135 111 HCLOSE N 24 24 46.2 W 0.0033 3036.95479 2990.88239 92 PREC = 1 TO 395435 Area = 101454.67 sq ft 2.32908 ac FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO 110 111 CENTERLINE INDIANA AVE AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 2000.00000 2000.00000 1 1 INV N 0 35 03.0 W 873.9500 2873.90458 1991.08968 4 4 INV N 0 35 03.0 W 49.9600 2923.86198 1990.58032 112 112 INV N 8923 06.0 E 291.4700 2926.99049 2282.03353 113 RADIAL S 0 36 54.0 E DELTA 18 44 57.0 LT RADIUS 715.0000 TAN 118.0416 L -ARC 233.9728 RADIAL S 19 21 51.0 E RP 3641.94930 2274.35902 114 113 CHORD N 80 00 37.5 E 232.9303 2967.39670 2511.43241 115 TAN@PT N 70 38 09.0 E RADIAL S 19 21 51.0 E DELTA 10 38 07.0 LT RADIUS 715.0000 TAN 66.5506 L -ARC 132.7187 RADIAL S 29 59 58.0 E RP 3641.94930 2274.35902 116 115 CHORD N 65 19 05.5 E 132.5283 3022.73767 2631.85302 117 TAN @PT N 60 00 02.0 E 117 INV N 60 00 02.0 E 343.0400 3194.25479 2928.93604 118 118 INV N 60 00 02.0 E 165.0000 3276.75341 3071.83103 119 119 INV N 29 59 58.0 W 43.0000 3313.99271 3050.33139 120 LAT & DEP 0.00871 - 0.00649 120 HCLOSE N 36 41 06.5 W 0.0109 3314.00141 3050.32491 38 PREC = 1 TO 196491 No Area FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO CENTERLINE HARMONY LANE AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 2967.39670 2511.43241 115 115 INV S 29 59 58.0 E 122.5300 2861.28202 2572.69638 121 RADIAL N 60 00 02.0 E DELTA 18 33 08.0 RT RADIUS 410.0000 TAN 66.9646 L -ARC 132.7569 RADIAL N 78 33 10.0 E RP 2656.28546 2217.62398 122 121 CHORD S 20 43 24.0 E 132.1777 2737.65619 2619.46823 123 TAN @PT S 11 26 50.0 E RADIAL N 78 33 10.0 E DELTA 11 26 52.0 RT RADIUS 410.0000 TAN 41.0961 L -ARC 81.9186 RADIAL S 89 59 58.0 E RP 2656.28546 2217.62398 124 liz"u UMuxu a *u �4.,141 M ml./mc4 Coao.cm/^+u �OC/.0ca10 la`) TAN@PT S 0 00 02.0 W 125 INV S 0 00 02.0 W , 221^8600 2434.42148 2627.62183 126 126 INV S 0 00 02.0 W 245.0000 2189.42148 2627.61945 127 127 INV 8 0 00 02.0 W 190.0000 1999.42148 2627.61761 128 128 INV N 89 56 50.0 W 627°6200 1999.99961 1999.99787 129 LAT & DEP 0,00039 0.00213 129 HCLOSE N 79 43 13.6 E 0.0022 2000.00000 2000.00000 1 PREC = 1 TO 750485 No Area FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO CENTERLINE UNNAMED STUB AUTO INVERSE ***** START 2189.42148 2627.61945 127 INV S 89 56 51.0 E 45^0000 2189.38025 2672.61943 130 INV N 0 02 29.0 W 25.0000 2214^38024 2672.60137 ~ LAT & DEP -0.00185 -0^00434 131 HCLOSE S 66 57 18.1 W 0.0047 2214^37840 2672.59703 PREC = 1 TO 14842 No Area FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST CENTERLINE McMILLIAN LANE SLY OF BALDWIN LANE AUTO INVERSE ***** START RADIAL N 72 11 46.0 E 2908,1729 3074.94958 127 130 131 21 TO CENTERLINE AUGUSTA LANE AUTO INVERSE ***** START 2434.42148 2627.62183 126 126 INV S 89 56 51.0 E 125.0000 2434.30695 2752.62177 132 132 INV S 0 00 02.0 W 35.0000 2409"30695 2752.62153 133 LAT & DEP - 0^00187 -0.00264 133 HCLOSE S 54 41 27.2 H 0.0032 2409.30508 2752.61889 24 PREC = 1 TO 46335 No Area FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO CENTERLINE 8ALDHIN LANE THENCE NLY ON McMILLIAN LANE AUTO INVERSE ***** START 2737.65619 2619.46823 123 RADIAL S 14 00 58.0 E DELTA 13 06 59.0 LT RADIUS 2129^8600 TAN 244.8585 L-ARC 487.5764 RADIAL S 27 07 57,0 E RP 4804.10528 2103,62737 134 123 CHORD N 69 25 32.5 E 486.5125 2908.62729 3074"94958 135 TAN@PT N 62 52 03.0 E RADIAL N 72 11 46°0 E DELTA 12 11 44.0 LT RADIUS 725.0000 TAN 77.4517 i-ARC 154.3181 RADIAL N 60 00 02^0 E RP 2686.95135 2384.67082 136 135 CHORD N 23 54 06,0 W 154.0270 3049.44526 3012.54275 137 TAN@PT N 29 59 58.0 W 137 INV N 29 59 58.0 W 167.2100 3194.25418 2928.93915 138 LAT & DEP 0^00062 -0^00311 138 HCLOSE N 78 46 15.2 W 0.0032 3194.25479 2928.93604 118 PREC = 1 TO 254882 No Area FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO 135 t)tLIH 1 c:t5 J1.@ HI RADIUS 725.)3000 _ TAN 9 ;43 L -ARC 18.x676 RADIAL N 73 40 17.0 E RP 2686.95135 2384.67082 136 135 CHORD S 17 03 58.5 E 18.6671 2890.78217 3080.42795 139 TAN @PT S 16 19 43.0 E RADIAL S 73 40 17.0 W DELTA 24 33 49.0 LT RADIUS 625.0000 TAN 136.0641 L -ARC 267.9474 RADIAL S 49 06 28.0 W RP 3066.49839 3680.21859 140 139 CHORD S 28 36 37.5 E 265.9001 2657.34952 3207.75463 141 TAN @PT S 40 53 32.0 E 141 INV N 49 06 28.0 E 25.0000 2673.71547 3226.65319 142 LAT & DEP 0.00510 - 0.00837 142 HCLOSE N 58 37 28.3 W 0.0098 2673.72057 3226.64482 32 PREC = 1 TO 31802 No Area SVONANI: COUNTY COURT PIOUS( TO: Enclosure BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 MEMORANDUM Spokane County County Engineer Spokane County Utilities Spokane County Health District Spokane County Department of Building & Safety Fire Protection District No. 1 Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19 Central Valley School District No. a t 3 s 44, FROM: ' ffiomas G. Mosher, AICP, Senior Planner DATE: November 7, 1989 SUBJECT: Extension of Time fo PPE- 141481 Riverway Villa PLANNING DEPARTMENT *ftfly D Nov 7 1989 County Engineering The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached request for an Extension of Time to finalize the plat of Riverway Villa. If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should be made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to us by November 27, 1989. Thank you. mo c: H & E Investments, E. 5503 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99212 Inland Pacific Engineering Co., Inc., S. 25 Altamont, Spokane, WA 99202 Plat Number: i • Number of Lots: 387 PRELIMINARY PLAT EXTELSICN OF TIME FORM Address: S. 25 Altamont City, State; Zip: Spokane, WA 99202 Phone No: 535 1410. * * * * * * * * * * ** PHASED PROJECT Number of lots remaining to be finalized: Number of acres remaining: 118 * * * * * * * * * * ** See Attached Plat Name. (_� ? Leictic L �2cCty Number of Acres: 118 Sponsor: H &E Investments Property Owner: H &E. Investments Address: E. 5503 Broadway Address: E. 5503 Broadway City, State, Zip: Spokane, WA 99212 City, State, Zip: Spokane, WA 99212 Phone No: 534 -6531. Phone No: 534 -6531 Engineer /Surveyor: Inland Pacific Engineering Co., Inc. (TO BE COMPLETED ONLY IF THE PLAT IS BEING DEVELOPED AND FINALIZED IN PHASES) Number of lots originally approved: 387 Number of phases finalized to date: 0 387 PLEASE PROVIDE US WITH THE FOLLGJING INFORMATION Briefly summarize the progress made, to date, in preparing the plat to be finalized (i.e., physical construction, bonding for improvements, surveying and drafting work, accumplishing various departmental requirements, obtaining or granting easements, 'etc.) Signed: App scant urveyor The Washington State Parks Department has been working over the past year with the project sponsor for the purpose of acquiring a portion of the project for construction of the Centennial Trail. The Parks Department has made several design changes during this process, leaving the project sponsor unsure of what the final land requirements will be for the Centennial project, and therefore unable to redesign Riverway Villa to accommodate the trail. The Parks Department indicates that they are close to identifying the property necessary and will be in a position to negotiate with the project sponsor soon (see attached letter and map). The sponsor requests an extension of time be approved to facilitate this negotiation process and allow time to redesign the proposal and finalize the first phase of the proposal. Since the land encompassed by the proposal has some very special title privileges not enjoyed by any other land parcel along this section of the river, we estimate that negotiations could be lengthy and that the time necessary to complete negotia- tions concerning the Centennial Trail and then to redesign the project and finalize Phase I could exceed one year. We therefore request an extension of time for two years. IAN TVETEN Director STATE OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 7150 Cleanwater Lane, KY -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -5711 • (206) 753-5755 October 30, 1989 Mr. Tom Mosher County Planning N. 7721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 -0220 RE: Property east of Barker Road Dear Tom: This is to let you know that State Parks is in the process of appraisal and negotiation of additional property on the south side of the Spokane River, east of Barker Road for purposes of the Centennial Trail project. Some of this property, currently owned by Gloria Hedlund and Jim Etter, is considered by State Parks to be an important addition to property already owned by the agency in this area. Unfortunately, it has taken some time to identify this necessary addition and we are currently in the appraisal process, with negotiations soon to follow. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 458 -4061. Sincerely, _ a E. McHugh 1•.1 Centennial Trail Coor M or cc: R.L. Fankhauser INTRODUCTION SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS OF FACT. CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER This matter has come before the Hearing Examiner Committee on June 24, 1993. The members of the Committee present are Verona Southern, Chairperson, Frank Yuse and Han Gibbons. PROPOSAL The appellant, Jim Reuter, requests an appeal of an approved Extension of Time for PE- 1414 -81, Riverway Villa, an approved Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The property is generally located South of the Spokane River, East of Barker Road and North of Mission Avenue in Section 8, Township 25 N., Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. On July 29, 1993, the Spokane Count P annin Department received a written request from the appellant, Jim Reuter, as withdraw th'e preliminary plat of Riverway Villa. The I-learing Examine Committee, by accepting the withdrawal, renders the preliminary plat and appeal of the extension of time null and void. 8 /931 - IEC Order forPE- 14 -81 Page 2 ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the above Findings of Fact and Conclusion, accepts the withdrawal by Jim Reuter, of the application of the Preliminary Plat for PE- 1414 -81 described in the application known as Riverway Villa. Motion by: Seconded by: Vote: ( ) UNANIMOUS TO APPROVE THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RIVERWAY VILLA AND RENDER THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND APPEAL OF THE EXTENSION OF TTME NULL AND VOID. HEARING, EXAMINER COMM 11 1 EE HEREBY A 1 1 EST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE z CFurmarf AIIEST: For WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Director (A" #� ,10 W. PE RS ON JOHN nior Planner E/23/92 Date ,U1(' 9..'L(( ,l,C c LK /Y Pursuant to County regulations, any aggrieved party has the right to appeal this written decision to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners within ten (10) calendar days of the signing of this order. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a written appeal, preferably on forms designed for such purpose, to the Board of County Commissioners,' W. 1116 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, along with a $200 processing fee payable to the Spokane County Treasurer. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456 -2205. TO: BUILDING AND PLANNING • JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Thank you. WC c: Enclosure MEMORANDUM Ed Dean Inland Pacific Engineering Stanton- Spokane L.P. Riverwalk 50 L.L.C. Wel Co. Group, c/o 1-1 & H Property Pacific Properties K.C. Construction A DIVISION OF THE PUnLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DENNIS M. Scorr, P.G., DIRECroR Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads Spokane County Division of Utilities Spokane Regional Health District Spokane County Division of Building & Planning, Jeff Forry Spokane County Park, Recreation & Fair Fire Protection District No. I Consolidated Irrigation District Central Valley School District No. 356 Washington State Department of Transportation Lk/ Louis Webster, AICP, Associate Planner April 22, 1998 Extension of Time for PE- 1414- 81/PUDE- 1- 82/ZE- 92 -81, Riverwalk The Spokane County Division of Building & Planning has received the attached request for an Extension of Time to finalize the preliminary plat of PE- 1414 -81 /PUDE- 1- 82 /ZE- 92-81, Riverwalk If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should _. be mlde a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to me by May ' 6, 1998. 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 PHONE: (509) 456 -3675 • FAX: (509) 456 -4703 TDD: (509) 311 -3166 RECEIVED g 2 2 1998 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER s Owner: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: Applicant/Sponsor: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: Surveyor: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & PLANNING EXTENSION OF TIME APPLICATION FILE NO.: PE- 1414- 81 /PUDE 1 -82 7E -92 -81 No. of lots originally approved: DATE ENT fIF TIME f EtQ.1:21JM1 SEE ATTACHED SHEET 16720 NE 116 Street Redmond, WA 98052 Fax: Ed Dean, Stanton- Spokane L.P. 1- 206 -869 -6618 Fax: 1- 206 -869 -6620 Inland Pacific Engineering Co., Inc. 707 West 7th Ave., Site 200 NO. OF LOTS: 365 Lots Approved Spokane,•..WA 99204 458 -6840 Fax: 458 -6844 1. Has any portion of the plat, short plat or BSP been finalized? (Recorded with the Auditor • Riverwalk 1st through 7th Addition Final Plats have been fi with the Spokane County Auditor's Office. 2. Has a proposed final plat, short plat or BSP been submitted to the Division of Building and Planning? Yes XX , No If no, why has the plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized? Riverwalk 8th Addition has been submitted for both final design and plat approval. Riverwalk 9th Addition has also been submitted for both final design and plat approval. 3. What progress has occurred? What conditions of approval have been completed (such as survey work, improvements constructed, departmental approvals obtained)? Riverwalk 1st through 7th Additions are constructed and complete and comprise approxiamtely 246 lots of the total 365 lots shown on the Preliminary Plat Riverwalk 9th has sewer,water and power in with road construction expected this spring or early summer. Riverwalk Sth has preliminary design approval but will not start construction until Indiana Avenue has been accepted by the Spokane County Engineer's Office. 4. Is this a phased project? Yes xx No 365 If yes, please complete the following information: 7 Phases No. of phases fnaiized to date: No. of lots remaining to be finalized: 119 No. of acres remaining to date: SIGNATURE Or OWNERt 33.77 Acres PLEASE SUBMIT THIS FORM ALONG WITH THE REQUIRED TIME EXTENSION FEE TO THE DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING $'rlaivffil ?rt1i1 °.wr: , +gi °fC S.POKANF COUNTY APR 1 A 1998 iIVISM N OF l3U!U NGA D PIJIMING Washington State Department of Transportation Sid Morrison Secretary or Transportation June 8, , 2000 Mr. Jim Richardson Spokane County Planning Dept. West 1026 Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 992 Re:Riverwal •UD (PE- 1414 -81; ! DE -1 -82; ZE- 92 -81) Dear Mr. R Eastern Region 2714 N. Mayfair Street Spokane, WA 99207 -2090 509- 324 -6000 / Fax 509-321-6005 RECE sit JUN 12 ?000 E CoUN1y Et! NGINEER The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has reviewed the requested time extension for the above development proposal. We ask that our existing conditions of approval that relate to WSDOT contained in the June 16, 1995 Extension of Time on this project be retained. We have also attached a copy of this time extension for your use. If you have any questions on this matter, please feel free to contact me at 324 -6199. Sincerely, Greg Figg Transportation Planner Attachments cc: Susan Murphy, CLC Inc. (w /o attachment) Scott Engelhard, Spokane County Engineers (w /o attachment) Project File: 090 - 293 -08A • Dean Housley Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 Attn: Ed Dean Dear Ed: Oifin4lve va11196106u Bruce A. Howard, E.I.T. Project Manager enc. cc: file Mark Hancock 1 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 May 17, 1996 INLAND PACIF C ENGINEERING, INC. IPE W.O. # 96106 RE: Riverwalk 1st Addition (PE- 1414 -81) Construction Verification and Certification 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 �I tetit MAY 2 0 1996 I am writing this letter to confirm and clarify the engineering services requested by Mark Hancock and Verne Jacobsen of your office. We have opened a new job number (96106) Riverwalk 1st Addition Construction Inspection at their request. The time billed to this project will be complete on a time and materials basis for verification and certification of the street and drainage facilities, as well as prepare post construction drawings as required by Spokane County for "acceptance" of the Phase 1 construction plans. The attached letter dated August 8, 1995 should be used as an outline for the scope of work to be performed, but may not include all necessary construction inspection items required by Spokane County. We will continue to work with Verne and Mark and utilize their assistance to maintain costs on this project. I have also included a copy of our work authorization including our hourly billable rates for your information. Please consider this letter authorization to commence work by signing at the bottom of this page. We will not begin any work on this project until authorization is received. If you have questions concerning any of these items, please give me a call at our office. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering Company 5 — A S—r l 5 poFUAot L.P 1 . .�--- 10_, I i � Washington State Department of Transportation Sid Morrison Secretary of Transportation Mr. Mike Nicholson Spokane County Planning 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 -0240 Dear Mr. Nicholson: Eastom Region 2714 N. Mayfair Street Spokane. WA 99207 -2090 RECEIVED ( 324 -6000 NOV 1 0 1994 SPOKANECOUNTV N November Wh4 Pc -Iy1 -8 1 Re: Riverway Villa Time Extension 1 -90 As you may be aware, the above development prepared a traffic analysis for Phase I of their proposed development. This traffic study identified deficiencies that exist or will exist at the 1 -90 Eastbound off-ramp/Barker Road ramp terminal. In order to provide adequate capacity at this ramp terminal the applicant has agreed to widen the eastbound off -ramp to two lanes at the ramp terminal. This widening will be engineered and constructed by the applicant in a manner satisfactory to both WSDOT and Spokane County Engineers. WSDOT recommends the following conditions be required as a condition of approval under the proposed extension of time as requested by the developer: 1. That the applicant engineer and construct widening to the 1 -90 Eastbound off -ramp to provide two lanes at the ramp terminal. This widening will consist of the construction of a right turn lane at the ramp terminal, and the related improvements necessary for the installation of this right turn lane. This right turn lane will need to be engineered and constructed in a manner satisfactory to WSDOT and Spokane County Engineers. 2. To facilitate construction of this right turn lane a developers agreement will need to be executed with WSDOT prior to the finalization of any portion of the plot. 3. Due to the fact that the traffic analysis prepared for this site is only for 37 homes, additional traffic analysis will be required for development at this property beyond Phase I (37 lots). Mr. Nicholson November 8, 1994 Page 2 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this extension of time and if you should have any questions please feel free to contact Leonard Cash in our planning office at 324 -6199. JCL LCC:eh cc:CP.at.Harper,Spokane- County-Engineers Sincerely, J.C. LENZI•• Regional Administrator By: LEONARD CASH, PE Regional Planning Engineer VARIANCE # BLDG # OTTIER # ) /9-1 g- S ( 6 , T as— PARCEL # 45 ROAD NAME _DV n heiNA 416- AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES have been collected. LEGAL DESCRIPTION of your access easement. Please call when ready I ERI Q zP vs.a - (840 Notice to Public #. Jeff •••- SSv c 07 OW ct N'f/t7 Right -of -Way Agent / " k\p Anoticc.192 APPLICANTS NAME MAILING ADDRESS PHONE - HOME PHONE - WORD The following documents are needed before the Spokane County Engineer's Department can begin processing your variance or building application as approved. (509) 456 -3600 RECORDED COPY OF DEED, DEED OF TRUST, contract or conveying instrument. These may be obtained from the County Auditor, 2nd floor of the Courthouse. A LISTING OF NAMES of individuals who will be signing the documents. These individual names - should appear as the person(s) legally sign their flame. STA n11pi Dry op gh e M4 Cn vv ■ p y A CURRENT ASSESSOR'S MAP which depicts the location of your property. OWNERSHIP MICRO -RUN. These may be obtained from the County Assessors, 1st Boor, of the Courthouse, Jefferson entrance, 2nd door on the left. The necessary documents will be prepared by the Engincer"s Department, Right -of-Way Section, upon provision of the information noted above. You will be notified when the documents are ready for signature. The documents may be sent to you, however, IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED. 'Ibe Engineer's Department does have notaries available if you choose to sign the documents at oui office. Please mail when ready Right -of -Way COMMENTS Pn ti46D ! uR si AR[i v# rJ ( ( l/ 1 t - S/9( F} Avb ✓JP,9 /4J4&& E9ts &�i6.v7S ARC GRAWr&D To Ive2ct//e -t Forward to you from Da t //,7) LL. /2 7j rS JUL -20 -1995 16:38 TO: !ter l% /ERV SPOKANE C27hw7y E,/G. ATTENTION: Description F4)( fl Xerox Prints EJ Original Drawing 0 Work Authorization No. Copies Purpose Sig / 1 1 / . INLAND PACIFIC ENG litSaa i re INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERI''J C COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509) Fa..: (509)458 -6844 Description 32y— 3y7' Q Copy of Letter Contract Documen_s Report (Information 0 Review & Comments C Written Approval 0 Signature & Return Remarks / ve Here '5 /ow/ ?zed/ / / - f? 9&Q lo corn le gaseryion Phase Gif // /iC c-,',.: -. . 76(esftm 5 DATE: i'!/L 2o /f!5 I.P.E. PRO! .CT Th 9552 7 PROJECT ' i=. /`, l/erlva //< h% < /1(1f 763 , Liar / Pt:r Your Request Ott ?e P. 01 P e t" r7L- JUL -20 -1995 16:39 INLAND PRCIFIC ENG Prepared for: TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSU:R NORTH 720 ARG.^.NNE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON: S 9 2 DEAN - HOUSLEY CO. ATTN: MARK HANCOCK 16720 NE 116TH STREET REDMOND, WA 99052 cc: Inland Pacific Engineers /Calkins cc: North Idaho Engineering Inc. /Morris Re: STANTON DEVELOPMENT Charge : $175.00 Sales Tax: 14.00 Total : $189.00 L I M I T E D L I A B I L I T Y C This is a report as of July 13, 1995, at hereinafter described. The information contsL__ . the purpose of determining the status of the restricted to the use of the addressee, and i closing any transaction affecting title to - limited to the charge made for this certifica-:.. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: VESTED IN: A portion of the Southwest quarter of Se Range 45 East, W.M., more particular__: dis_ COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of .: 37 °28'22" East 1695.03 feet to the True hereinafter described; thence North o0 °CC South 29 °S9'SS" East 160.00 feet; -he feet; thence North 29 °59'5S" West 160.•C: Beginning; Situate in the County of Spokane, State c= STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Washin: nominee for Stanton Spokane Limited Par: Partnership. EXCEPTIONS: Pace 1 of 4 RECE yr ? , JUL 2 0 1995 i,P.E.C. Trr,rsamerica No.: MW194985 I C A E P.02 covering property is ;jade solely for described herein, is _4 used as a basis for -: Liability is ,_unship 25 North, :icn a; thence North - .nine of the land S.50 feet; thence .7°30 West 123.50 the, True Point of =-al Partnership, as - shington Limited JUL -20 -1995 16 :39 1 General taxes, as follows, together with i...:.:_ -_, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd hale on November 1) Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed 55083.9010 1995 $651.21 55083.9052 1995 $4,134.58 2. The legal description of the land descril;e :.._.=_in is a portion of a County Tax Assessor's Parcel. Con e anca 5. cbrtion of said parcel may violate R.C.W. 58.17. Under Exclusions _,.. .Coverage, loss arising from such a violation is excluded from _ rage. 3. Assessments levied by Consolidated Irric_: with interest, penalty and statutory delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half Tax Account No. 55083.9010 55083.9052 Year Amount Billed 1995 $396.40 1995 $1,376.40 4. Liability to future assessments by t'_nsc' 19. 5. Liability to future charges by Spokane C.. 6. Declaration of Covenants and RAG` -'c recorded on May 20, 1994, under Reccrdi 7. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITiOice KS GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.03 Stanto.. Nay 940F20". Page 2 of _ Order No. MW194985 Principal Balance 5325.60 $2,067.29 ::_strict No. 19, together if any, after on November 1) _._prance principal Balance $ „539.20 :ion District No. Storm Water service. 's_d by instrument ::0C420. Company, a partnership, on n_ as nominee for a Washington JUL-20-1995 16:40 8. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDIT.= GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: Investigation should be made to determinc rent balance owed by contacting the appropriate lender/acency. f. 9. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDIT= GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: INLAND PACIFIC ENG Stanton Deve7.- General Pan Stanton Washington Transamericc: Timberland $850,000.00 October 12, October 17, 941017045S Stanton j:,:. General ?: Stanton FE:. Washinton Transateri: Timberiar:d $106,000.0C January 4, 1 January 2E, 95012603 Investigation should be made to de contacting the appropriate lender/aency SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT AND THE TERCS RECORDED: January RECORDING NO.: The above deed of trust was madt recorded under Recording No. 94o5:: herein. Page 3 oL P.04 Order No. MW194985 • Company, a Washington as nominee for IThited Partnership, a ;artnership Thourance Company Thnk t:)any,-a Washington as Nominee for .Hted Partnership, a . Thrtnership - :Isurance Company - snk - -.7ent balance owed by rr:EREOP: deed of trust at paragraph 10 JUL -20 -1995 16:40 10. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CC _- =C GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: Investigation should be made to de._== contacting the appropriate lender/ c_r.c . (Covers property herein described SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT AND THE TE?_"::. ?, BY AGREEMENT DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: The above deed of trust was made c _ recorded under Recording No. 9.10_:::4 herein. 11. Potential liability for assessment= Department for the Aquifer Protectic: ... In order to make payment, account Enclosures Sketch sac INLAND PACIFIC ENG Stantc : ._ . . genera c : .. as nominee Washincton Transa ;:eric MorV'es_ Colum:ia Co . $500,000 G. May May 12, 9405_. Page 4 END OF EXCE P.05 Oder No. MW194985 . - emay, a Washington :s own behalf and cokane L.P., a _tnershiP .:.. =.urance Company ation, a British ;Glance owed by _..F : deed of trust it paragraph 8 County Utility call 458 -2538. _.. :: _TRANCE COMPANY c :fer call: :25 -1519 jeer 6 53 LOTS Z5.00 Ac- 28.93 Ac . 5 p ( ; 7. 9 ‘" L 6'0 pn ir 0 p e . / . ?4. A JUL-12: WED 9'i2 AM NORTH IDAHO ENGINEERING FAX NO. 2118 664 3507 North ...daho Engineerin, Inc. 4200 Seltice Way, Sake 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone C208) 667 -1171 • Fax 0208) 664 -3507 +4z*z24s#3xx **xzx*zz **s231xz x3333 i* itisi******3x211233z**3z1[3223*sz FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL x* sssiiszszzizzzxziz* si3ii3ii zzziizzi33i3 33i33233333sszs*zss*ziz* PAGE: (1) OF 7 DATE SENT,: 7/2/94" 3.N. 0 5 1 00N COMPANY: Spko n,c Co 0019 AVIV: lane L{or +o y REF: R fiver 1�� F' 1k► rSt44 [X): E 7 URGENT '''PER YOUR REDDEST [ 7 APPROVAL REGARDING: NOTE : C 3 INFORMATION marts 4 tK4o„/}s [ 3 REVIEW AND RESPOND [ 3 NORMAL /TODAY [ 1 CONFIDENTIAL [ 7 OTHER: 0 ! SENT BY I j /7/Y2�� !./_ 1 e fiiie "Gs MESSAGE; 1;40 Agri' A e0 /QIA7tCti/I1 f{ Gk. 111 Cope f3iN 1 Its / i . • a. is . p/e9s4 ; pirerr ton of OCIcu,M.AS {or 1 S4?.81S I r Ants / IF TRANSMISSION IS UNCLEAR, OR INCOMPLETE PLEASE CALL THE ABOVE LISTED TZLEPNCNE NUMBER AND INFORM SENDER. JUL -I2 -95 WED 9:12 AM NORTH IDAHO ENGINEERING • A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST, W.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE NORTH 37'28'22" EAST 1696.03 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED; THENCE NORTH 60'00'02" EAST 123.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29'59'58" EAST 160.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 60'00'02" WEST 123.50 FEET; FAX NO, 2Q8 664 3507 P. 2 THENCE NORTH 29'59'58" WEST 160.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OP SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON ,stri'., Fax Note 7672 cl��s /tee t ea s-.. Vii . . L 1 . e kp Prepared for: NORTH IDAHO ENGINEERING INC. ATTN2 MICHAEL HUNT 4200 SELTICE WAY, STE. 2 COEUR D'ALENE, ID 83814 l uata ff6 Amval-ttsgti Fan Yokota.* Oyr9 f I— oeLip ❑M /" ❑CaA 1o•P"? .. r mss... TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY NORTH 720 ARGONNE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99212 Order No.: JR- 186774M EIGHTH P L A T C E R T I F I C A T E Effective Date: July 13, 1995, at 8:00 a.m. Certificate for filing Plat of: RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for approval, this company has examined the records of Spokane County Auditor's and Clerk's offices, and the records of the Clerk of the United States District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount, if any, paid for this certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to -wit: See "LEGAL DESCRIPTION:" VESTED IN: STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Washington general partnership, as nominee for Stanton Spokane Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership EXCEPTIONS: 1 Taxes d a ss e ss m ent s, 55083.9052 and if earch having been made thereof, as to esran Parcel numbers are provided from the latest Assessor's Maps available to the company. hereto r, Said company numbers makes no assurance as to of public validiity or record therefor, P Y. accuracy relating thereto. 2. Liability to future charges by Spokane County for Storm Water service. 3. Liability to future assessments by Consolidated Irrigation District No 19. 4. Declaration instrument on May 20, 1994, under Recording No. 9405200420. recorded Page 1 of 5 q YL 7 (LEGAL DESCRIPTION) A portion of the South half of the Southwest quarter of Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, W.M., more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of said Section 8; thence North 00 °35'03" West 873.95 feet along the West line of said section; thence North 89 °24'57" East 30.00 feet to the East Right of Way line of Barker Road marked by a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap, the true point of beginning of the land hereinafter described; thence continuing North 89°24'57" East 15.00 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with a plastic cap; thence along the arc of a 20.00 foot radius, non - tangent curve which is concave Southeasterly an arc distance of 7.14 feet through a central angle of 20 °27'23" and whose chord bears North 09 °38'39" East 7.10 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence departing the previously described curve along a non - tangent line North 89 °23'06" Fast 245.23 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence along the arc of a 758.00 foot radius curve which is concave Northwesterly an arc distance of 109.27 feet through a central angle of 08 °15'34" to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence departing the previously described curve along a non - tangent line South 29 °56'26" East 215.80 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence South 00 °00'04" West, 686.49 feet to a point on the Northerly right of way line of Mission Avenue which is marked by a 1/2 inch rebar with, plastic cap; thence along said right of way South 89°56'50" East, 173.60 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence departing said right of way North 00 °03'10" East 10.00 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence along the arc of a 20.00 foot radius non - tangent curve which is concave Northeasterly an arc distance of 31.40 feet through a central angle of 89 °56'52" and whose chord bears North 44 °58'24" West 28.27 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence North 00 °00'02" East 95.00 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence along the arc of a 20.00 foot radius curve which is concave Southeasterly an arc distance of 31.43 feet through a central angle of 90 °03'08" to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence departing the previously described curve along a non - tangent line North 00 °02'29" West 50.00 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence South 89 °56'51" East 50.02 feet to a 1/2 inch Mbar with plastic cap; thence North 00 °00'02" East 195.00 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap;ythence South 89 °56'51" East 30.00 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar East 180.42 with plastic cap; thence thence South 8 56 51" East feet to plastic 1 /tar with plastic cap; 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence South 42 °29'21" East 89.99 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence South 59 °59'5 East 182.52 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence North 30 °00'02" East 25.00 feet to a.1 /2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence North 59 °59'58" West 102.02 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; (Legal description, continued on Page 3) Page 2 of 5 Order No. JB- 186774M RICI 474. f.°C 71111 "fTNa1JMC11NN1 IJl1N4 t r 0 (Legal description, continued from Page 2) thence North 26 °49'17' West 53.52 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence North 49 °06'28" East 185.43 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence along the arc of a 600.00 foot radius, non - tangent curve which is concave Northeasterly an arc distance of 40.16 feet through a central angle of 03 °50'0 and whose chord bears North 38 °58'29" West 40.15 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence departing the previously described curve along a non - tangent line North 52°56'34" East 150.00 feet et West o a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence 145.73 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap;thence North 22 °41'20" West 149.19 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence North 29 °59'58" West 290.98 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence South 60 °00'02" West 508.04 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence along the arc of a 672.00 foot radius curve which is concave Northwesterly an arc distance of 235.73 through a central angle of 20 °05'55" and l whose chord tbears South 70 °02'59" West to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; departing the previously described curve along a non - tangent line South 00 °34'05" East 16.81 feet to a 1/2 inch rebar with plastic cap; thence South 89 °23'06 West 369.88 feet to a point on the East right of way line of Barker Road which is marked by a 1/2 inch ebar Southr00 °35'03" East t84 .98pfeetetoe the o true a right point of beginning; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington CC!tl CCCI 07 I° Page 3 Of 5 Order No. JE- 186774M CTCI C7C C°C 7'I1 H'ILN]LIH[HL111 LIl11J 5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: 6. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: ' RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: 7. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT AND THE RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: The above deed recorded under herein. THEREOF: Order No. JB- 186774M Stanton Development Company, a Washington general partnership, on its own behalf and as nominee for Stanton - Spokane L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership Ingress and egress Riverway Villa Entrance May 19, 1994 May 20, 1994 9405200419 CONDITIONS THEREOF: Stanton Development Company, a Washington General Partnership, as nominee for Stanton Spokane Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership Transamerica Title Insurance Company Timberland Savings Bank $850,000.0 October 12, 1994 October 17, 1994 9410170458 CONDITIONS THEREOF: Stanton Development Company, a Washington General Partnership, as Nominee for Stanton Spokane Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership Transamerica Title Insurance Company Timberland Savings Bank $108,000.00 January 6, 1995 January. 26, 1995 9501260003 TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: January 26, 1995 9501260004 of trust was made subordinate to the deed of h s t Recording No. 9405120396, set forth at paragraph Page 4 of 5. G TC1 074 AA0 11111 H11M1WHGNHHI WON-1 • Order No. JB- 186774M 8. DEED OF TRUST, ASSIGNMENT, SECURITY AGREEMENT AND FINANCING STATEMENT (FIXTURE FILING) AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: Stanton Development Company, a Washington general partnership, on its own behalf and as nominee for Stanton- Spokane L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership Transamerica Title Insurance Company Morvest Cpaital Corporation, a British Columbia corporation $500,000.0 May 10, 1994 May 12, 1994 940512039 RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: eed of Trust The above Deed of Trust recorded under Recording No. rd t made 9410170458, set forth at Exception No. 6 herein. 9. Potential liability for assessments levied by Spokane County Utility Department for the Aquifer Protection Area. To verify, call 458 -2538. In order to make payment, account number is necessary. sac TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owed by contacting the appropriate lender /agency /individual. (Covers property herein described and other property) SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: October 17, 1994 9410170 C • A 71 !111 bC:T1 CAAI TRANSAMERICA TITLE. INSURANCE COMPANY BY th {.. 1 For service o t Is order call: (509 922 -222 ( AX) 926 -1519 Jon Boyd, Title Officer Page 5 of 5 ATC1 Q7. ARC 71111 Hn1NzWHC,JHNI WON4 s T Derald E. Martin, President Welco Group Inc. P.O. Box 2825 Redmond, WA 98073 -2825 RE: Riverway Villa Planned Unit Development Design Dear Mr. Martin: PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLIS D. 1 IUBBARD, DIRECTOR June 2, 1994 Itkt:i 0i° Jai 021994 County Engineering - I met with Mike Hunt of North Idaho Engineering on May 17, 1994 to review the final plat of Riverway Villa First Addition and the overall Planned Unit Development design for the entire project. I am still waiting for a response from the Spokane County Engineer's Office for comments on the PUD design. I discovered that a copy of the preliminary PUD design was not circulated to Dick Fankhauser of the Washington State Parks Commission. 1 have discussed the design with Mr. Fankhauser and am waiting for his official comments which should be sent shortly. The following is a summary of my initial review for required design changes to your final plat of Riverway Villa, First Addition, for compliance with Conditions of Approval and current Zoning and Subdivision regulations: Final Plat of Riverway Villa, First Addition: • Submittal of County Assessor parcel maps, 1:200 & 1:400, outlining the final plat area and stamped by a land surveyor licensed in the State of Washington. • Copy of an approved water plan. • Removal of the vicinity map from the final plat. • Letters of easement acceptance from local utility purveyors; water, power, gas, and phone. • Detailed landscape and fence plan with estimate and promissory letter for installation. Landscaping is required along Villa Lane within open space tracts maintained by the Homeowner's Association. • Addresses drafted on final plat. • The County Engineer will require one foot strips at the terminus of all public rights -of -way. • Front and Flanking yard setbacks should be shown as approved with the approved Final PUD. • All property ownership interests need a signature block and notary statement. All notary stamps should be in black ink. • The legal description includes all of the site ownership. The plat certificate should be modified to reflect the portion of the site being platted. The lot and block designation for the remaining tract should be removed and changed to "unplatted ". • There is an easement and building encroachment disclosed in the Plat Certificate which should be addressed prior to final plat approval. • A copy of the Homeowner's documents should be submitted for review. • Finalize any mitigating agreements with the Central Valley School District and Spokane County Parks Department. • Approval of traffic study by the Spokane County Engineer and Washington State Department of Transportation. • There are a number of drafting changes which are shown on a "redlined" copy of the final plat and which was given to Mr. Hunt. WEST 1026 BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0240 • (509) 456 -2205 Derald E. Martin June 2, 1994 Page 2 Each department or agency is responsible for review of your final plat. Please coordinate your efforts with each department. Mike and I also discussed the design for the entire Riverway Villa Final PUD. I have the following comments to offer: Final Planned Unit Development of Riverway Villa: • Remove roadway cross - section design from final PUD site plan. All roadway design widths should be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's office. • Eliminate pseudo-cul -de -sacs from design. • No lot line shall be within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark. It's possible the 200 foot shoreline setback may affect plat design and reduce the total number of lots. • Add a 13 foot landscape buffer on the north side of Villa Avenue. The planting strip should be a separate tract owned by the Homeowner's Association for maintenance. Replace planting strip for other roads consistant with original site plan approval. • Show fence detail and height. • The phasing schedule did not account for the commercial lot labeled as Lot 1, Block 1. • Some comer lots may restrict building footprint area due to front and flanking setback requirements. • There are some minor drafting changes shown on a "redlined" copy of the draft final PUD which was given to Mr. Hunt. • The insert showing proposed building setbacks should be altered to show new setbacks for site built homes. The Planning Department recommends a front/flanldng setback of no less than 20 feet. The underlying standard for rear and side yards in the Urban Residential-7 (UR -7) zone is 15 feet and 5 feet/story respectively. A 20 foot perimeter rear yard has been shown and shall be adhered to. • Language to the effect "No direct access to lots within Riverway Villa to the Washington State Centennial Trail is permitted." will be placed on every phase finalized. I suggest you contact Pat Harper of the Spokane County Engineer's office for roadway design comments. All of the Conditions of Approval for Riverway Villa listed in the Time Extension dated August 5, 1993 will be applied to your Final PUD once your Final PUD design is accepted by each department. Once again, the approved preliminary plat of Riverway Villa is located in an area no longer exempt from on -site sewage regulations and any additional extensions of time granted for Riverway Villa may be conditioned on the extension of public sewer. Please coordinate any sewer plans with the Spokane County Utilities Department. The above comments are only preliminary, based on plans submitted, some additional fine tuning of the overall design may still be needed. I have been working with Mike Hunt an I am looking forward to completion of your PUD design so we can move ahead on finalization of the remaining phases. I can be reached at (509) 456 -2205 if you any questions. Since ely, mas Veljic Planner II pc: Wallis Hubbard, Director, Spokane County Planning Department Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineer Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks Mike Hunt, North Idaho Engineering Mr. Louis Webster Spokane County Planning W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 -0240 Dear Mr. Webster: Atarat Wi n Washington State Department of Transportation Sid Morrison Secretary of Transportation July 10, 1995 Eastern Region 2714 N. Mayfair Street Spokane. WA 99207 -2090 (509) 324-6000 Re: Riverwalk Development (Riverway Villa) at 1 -90 and Barker,Road We have completed our initial review of the applicant's traffic study for the above proposed development. Upon reviewing this study we have some concerns regarding the conclusions that where reached in the study. To ensure the project's probable adverse impacts are addressed we would ask that the comments and /or questions raised below be addressed prior to the county issuing a determination on this project. Additionally as stated in the conditions of approval on this plat the mitigating measures must be approved by both Spokane County and WSDOT. • This traffic study indicates that a signal will be installed by the Turtle Creek development at Barker Road and the I -90 eastbound off ramp, which is consistent with the environmental documentation prepared for this project. • Our concern regarding this matter is that the Spokane County Commissioners have not yet approved this development making its future uncertain at this time. We concur with the applicants engineer in the need to analyze the affects of the Turtle Creek development considering. where the development is in the process and the mitigation tied to the development. This part of the analysis needs to address any changes to the proposed scheduling of the signal to be installed by•Turtle Creek as this additional traffic may necessitate its installation sooner than originally planned. In addition to the analysis with Turtle Creek this traffic study needs to analyze the impact this development will have in the absence of Turtle Creek and its mitigation as the development may never materialize. • A justification based on existing traffic distribution (ie: turning movements) or traffic modeling needs to be provided to substantiate the diversion of traffic projected onto Euclid Avenue as indicated in Page 15 of the study. • Documentation needs to be provided that would indicate that after the 260th lot is platted that this would be the • appropriate time, based on LOS, to investigate the installation of signal at the westbound 1-90 ramps and Barker Road. We agree that signal warrants need to be met and operationally a signal is necessitated. prior =to tt being installed. C �' Y KJ JUL 1 7 1995 SPOKANE COUt:iY ENGINEER Mr. Webster July 10, 1995 Page 2 • We agree, as identified in this traffic study, that intersection improvements will be needed in the future at the intersection of Trent Avenue and Barker Road. Further engineering analysis will be needed to-determine what the most appropriate from of mitigation at this intersection will be. The engineering analysis should address whether a traffic signal or other less restrictive traffic control measures could be implemented to correct the level of service problem. It is also our intent to work with future developments in this area to provide potential funding for Barker Road and Trent Avenue improvements. However, at the current time there is no funding available for improvements to this intersection therefore the design work alone will not alleviate or mitigate capacity problems and would not be considered appropriate mitigation. If this improvement is needed prior to additional private or public funding becoming available, the applicant will be responsible for filly funding this improvement. • Air quality conformity will need to be investigated to ensure that signalization of the ramp terminals and the proposed mitigation at Barker Road and Trent Avenue is allowable under the requirements of the State and Federal Clean Air Acts. It should be noted that all improvements such, as signalization and improvements within WSDOT right of way must be approved by WSDOT and potentially the Federal Highway Administration if the improvements are part of the Interstate system. The applicant should be . aware if Federal approval, is required the time frames involved in the _review process will be lengthened and the timing of submittals should be adjusted to account for this increased review time. WSDOT requires that an intersection/signalization plan be prepared for these improvements Again we woidd ask that the applicant address our above concerns prior to Spokane County rendering a decision on the above project. If you should have any questions or comments please feel free to contact Leonard Cash in our planning department at 324 -6199. JCL LCC /gf cc: Ann Winkler, Inland Pacific Engineering Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers Sincerely, Yarr LEONARD C. CASH, PE Regional Planning Engineer cc:�roject file reviewer OFFICE OF THE COUNT' ENGINEER • Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer February 9, 1995 Joe Hassell, P.E. North Idaho Engineering SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. Design Deviations Gentlemen: I am enclosing a copy of the design deviation requests submitted by your office on December 1, 1994. Please note the following: a. Revisions to Barker Road Section: Approved, with conditions b. Revisions to Mission Avenue Section: Approved, with conditions c. Revisions to Indiana /Barker intersection: Not Approved Please update your file and plans accordingly. If you have any questions, please contact me at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P. E. Spokane County Engineer 0c. Edward . P Jr., P.E. Plans Review Engineer encls: Design Deviation request (3 requests, 1 copy each) A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 S P 0 1< A N E PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLIS D. HUD[3ARD, DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: Division of Engineering and Roads Division of Utilities Division of Buildings Spokane County Health District Spokane County Parks Department Fire Protection District No. 1 Consolidated Irrigation District Central Valley School District #356 Centennial Trail Committee Office WA State Department of Transportation FROM: Micheal E. Nicholson, Planner I DATE: March 7, 1995 SUBJECT: Review of REVISED Final Plat PE- 1414 -81 Riverwalk Phase One, formerly RIVERWAY VILLA Enclosed Fuld copies of the above referenced revised final plat, Riverwalk Phase One. Please review and forward any comments by March 20, 1995 If you have any questions you may contact Mike Nicholson at 456 -2205. To facilitate your review please keep in mind that it is the intent of the home owners association not to acquire the open space that would have been made available upon abandonment of the community drainfields. This would have been available to the home owners had Phase One been platted with on -site sewage disposal systems and community drainfields. The applicant has opted to construct a sewer system for all phases of the proposal. Therefore, the community drainfields will be platted pursuant to the approved 1983 revised Preliminary Plat of Record and Final S. 1/2 PUD Site Plan. The applicant is preparing the necessary home owners documentation to support the related condition. It should also be noted in your review that the Revised S. 1/2 Final PUD Site Plan (soon to be circulated) and the 1983 Final S. 1/2 PUD Site Plan are similar if not identical with regards to Phase One Final Plat. Thus, final plat review for Phase One of Riverwalk may proceed and your updated conditions as represented in the current approved time extension shall apply as well as any of the applicable conditions from the original approval and the subsequent time extensions. The 1983 S. 1/2 PUD Site Plan as approved should provide the basis for your review of the final plat of Phase One of Riverwalk, using current regulations. A revised Final S. 1/2 PUD Site Plan including a proposed Final PUD Site Plan for the North 12 is forthcoming from the applicant. When received, the PUD Site Plan will be circulated for your review and comment. However, Phase One Final Plat may proceed pursuant to the approvals already attained by the applicant as this area, Phase One, has not been revised and the proposal is consistent with the existing 1983 approvals. pc: Stanton Development, 16720 NE 116th Street, Redmond, WA 98052 North Idaho Engineering, 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2, Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 Inland Pacific Engineering, 707 West 7th, Suite 200, Spokane, WA 99204 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0240 • (509) 456 -2205 • FAX: (509) 456 -2243 • TDD: (509) 324 -3166 0 C 0 U NI "1 Y RECEIVED MAR 081995 Curti Engineering Date: To: From: RE: Language for the Dedication on IcWiledicat.rud I2 3 The private roads and /or common areas shown on this plat are hereby dedicated to the (Home Owners Association) created by document recorded under State UBI number (date) The private roads and /or common areas cannot be sold or transferred, regardless of any provisions in the covenants to the contrary without express approval by Spokane County, and shall be considered subservient estates for tax purposes to the other lots created herein. The private roads, as shown hereon, are easements which provide a means of ingress and di egress for those lots within the Plat having frontage thereon. Drainage easements, as platted and shown heron, which are for the purpose of installing, operating, and maintaining drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted to the or successors in interest. (date) under Auditor's Document No. which by reference is made a part hereof. (Home Owners Association) The County of Spokane is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all private roads, common areas and /or drainage easements. The private roads and drainage easements are subject to the separate DECLARATION OF COVENANT as recorded ky'vdcdan.rvd tAs In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of covenants and agrees that: DECLARATION OF COVENANT 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Development "), the undersigned 1. The subdivider /sponsor will construct the private roads and associated drainage facilities in confommnce with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 2. A lot is served by a private road when: a. the only road frontage for the lot in the Development is on the private road, or: b. a lot having frontage on more than one road (public or private) constructs an approach to the private road. 3. The Home Owners Association or their successors in interest shall maintain the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 4. The owner(s) of any lot created by the Development or alternation thereof and served by a private road shall be responsible for maintenance of said private road, including associated drainage facilities. 5 Maintenance financing of the private roads and associated drainage facilities shall be in a manner determined by the Home Owners Association or their successors in interest. 6. Should the l-Ionte Owners Association be terminated for any reason, the successors in interest shall he the individual lot owners, or their successors in interest, who are members of the Home Owners Association at the time of said termination. 7. In the event such private road including associated drainage facilities is improved to Spokane County standards for public streets, and the County is willing to accept the dedication of such road and drainage facilities, each lot owner shall execute any documents necessary 4o accomplish such dedication. 8. Owners of lots within the Development who are served by such road, may sue and recover damages and attorneys' fees from any owner of any lot within the Development which is similarly served who refuses to participate in the road and drainage facilities construction, financing. and maintenance. 9. WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve. or maintain or otherwise service the private roads, and associated drainage facilities contained within or providing service to the property described in the Development. By accepting this development or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued for property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind of nature whatsoever to establish, examine. survey, construct, alter repair, improve. maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road or its' associated drainage facilities. 10. Whenever the 1 - tome Owners Association or their successors in interest fail to maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved drainage plan, a notice will be given to the Home Owners Association or their successors in interest by the County. If not corrected after 10 days, the County has the right to correct the maintenance failure or have it corrected at the expense of the lionte Owners Association, their successors in interest, or lots in the development. 11. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas, no the responsibility for any drainage. whatsoever. including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. 12. Ibis covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road and drainage facilities as provided herein. OWNER OWNER Dated this day of . 19 . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) County of Spoknne ) On this day personally appeared before me known to me to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she/they signed the same as his/her /their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY IIAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this _day of ,19 . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane North 'Idaho Engineering, Inc. 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Cucul d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667.1171 • Fax (208) 664-330 T 141 ` 41- +*; s;i *1*** * * * * *x *** ***xYII* *2**12*ii3lii ;iXXX i* i* i 4 i it ti 22 **** FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL ****3*43x*iI2222223322IIMIX 4144141 ***** ist****M ******3 /33 [X]: [ ] URGENT REGARDING: SENT BY: l PAGE: (1) OF COMPANY: h ATTN: E /1 f/ //y REF: p;JVetiA71 L e,f' , G E- YOUR REQUEST C ] INFORMATION 'OP.TH IDGHO ENGINEEP.ING 2086r P.01 DAIE SENT: J.N. I/i? / '70 1) 64x(3a9 J L/79 C ] REVIEW AND RESPOND [ ] NORMAL /TODAY ( 3 APPROVAL ( ] CONFIDENTIAL C ] OTHER. �J crn7es li 07azi_ f MESSAGE: TO/' 4a11.5 a Prato y in de.s C rt vkzil "' NU1t: IF TRANSMISSION IS UNCLEAR, OR INCOMPLETE PLEASE CALL THE ABOVE LISTED TELEPHONE NUMBER AND INFORM SENDCR. N 0 10 M a rte; 9 SECTION LINE EXIST 1116 PAVE1-IEN t20' BARKER ROAD (5YM) 30' T T 12' TRAFFIC 12' 45' FROM SECTION LI TRAFFIC TYPE 'H" MIN. SWALE DEPTH = T/G - 230' ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT GL 'A' 4' (MIN) - D-1/2' CRUSHED SVRFACI146 TOP COURSE NOTE. CONSTRUCTION BASED ALONE SECTIONL1RE 0+00 TO 23435.63, FROM EXISTING (k, 2343563 TO 35463 LANE WIDTH TRANSITION TO EXI5TIN6 FROM STA. 2343563 To 31.00.0o 2' FUTURE ACOVI51TION R/14 / 25' OR SLOPE CATCH POINT 14141GHP_VER 15 GREATER —5' DRAINAGE, SIDFYIALK, SLOPE, 4 UTILITY EASEMENT 206 TREATMENT_ \\ AND 544014 STORAGE 5'-t I' t -1o' -- BARKER ROAD (ieo/ ) 6' IDEWALK 2% MIN. VG . 02' -GRATE ELEVATION = Q. • 05' LOCATE DRYHF_LL5 AS 9101-111 ON PLAN MISSION AVENUE TO SPOKANE RIVER TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION EXISTING GRADE 5.1 TO O.G. BARKER ROAD (SYN.) LEFT TURN LANE 12' TRAFFIC 45' 12' • TRAFFIC 2X MIN BOLE LANE L ACP 0. (min.) ACP CL "E" ACP DEPTH —CSTC PER R —VALUE TESTING 2 6 SIDEWALK ,v R/W FUTURE ACQUI9DDN 5' 208 TREATMENT ' AN0 SNOW STORAGE WIDTH AS REOUIRED DRAINAGE AND SIDEWALK EASEMENT 4 . 1 6' 2 SIDEWALK ZX MIN 5.1 1 dd .(' T/C + 0.2' TYPE 'Er CURB 6 MINIMUM WATER DEPTH FOR 208 6-3•61) 0.9' MINIMUM DEPTH FOR STORM VOLUME (-3.41) MAXIMUM WATER SURFACE O.EVATION DOES NOT ENCROACH ON FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA Dram By Dot F J31.2j. Deepwa By. E.J.P B/94 Checked By. HORIZONTAL• VERTICAL: SCALE NONE NONE OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER W. 1025 BROADWAY AVE SPOKANE WA. 99260 456 —}600 APPROVED• COUNT' ENGINEER Dot= — ¥ - 9Y BARKER ROAD MISSION AVENUE TO SPOKANE RIVER E.J.P TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION SHEET 1 OF 1 J S_ 7;014. :.' P 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208) 664 -3507 The Following Specific Items: Please North Engineerirt, Inc. X Herewith Separate Cover Via Mail X Delivery Personal Pickup Fedex UPS Other Drawings Calculations Report Letter Maps Check $ Plans X See at Right Call immediately Call after review X Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Regd. Review /Comment No action Regd. TRANSMITTAL ?1 To: W.S.D.O.T. Date: 12/1/94 Job no. 4004 NORTH IDAHO ENGINEERING! L;G 0 ± 1994 Attn: Greq Fiqg From: James 0. Morris Ref: 1 -90 Eastbound Off Ramp (Barker Road) We are transmitting *Status* RECEIVED DEC G s 1994 X Proposed For Information NE COUNTY ENGINEER Preliminary As requested In Progress Your Files Revised Your Submittal Final X Checking As -built X Approval For Payment Your Use Partial Other 2 copies Proposed Off Ramp design Message: cc: Edward J. Parry, Jr., P.E. 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 * Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 " Phone (208) 667-1171 • Fax (208)664 -3507 To: Spokane County Engineering Dept. Date: 6/8/95 Job No: 4004 ' ATTN: Ed Parry REF: Riverwalk 1" Addition We are Transmitting: *Status" X Herewith Proposed For Information Separate Cover Preliminary As requested Via Mail Progress Your Files X Delivery X Revised Your Submittal Personal Pickup X Final Checking Fedex As -built X Approval UPS For Payment Your Use Other Partial Other The Following: Drawings Calculations X Report Letter Maps Check $ Plans X See at Right Please: Call immediately Call after review X Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Regd. Review /Comment No action reqd. NORTH IDAHO ENGINEERINiu, INC. TRANSMITTAL 1414 RECEIVED JUN 0 8 1995 SPOKAN ER From: James O. Morris Specific items: 2 Copies Street and Drainage Plans. 2 Copies Hydrology Report. Message: Memorandum Date: June 6, 1995 To: /tie From: Development Engineering Services (Ed Perry, P.E.) Subject: P1414 - Riverwalk 1. Todd Whipple (IPEC) met today with Bill Hemmings and Ed Parry to discuss the status of the next submittal for phase 1. Plans were not submitted for review at this time. 2. Todd presented a revised drainage concept, as well as some changes to the Barker /Indiana connection. Todd noted that he has spent a good bit of time and effort reviewing and commenting on the plans that North Idaho Engineering intends to submit. 3. Todd also noted that he and Mark Storey (Howard Consultants) will be on the site virtually full -time to shepherd this phase through the tight construction timeline desired by the Developer. Todd (as requested by the Developer) did not, however, expect this effort to replace the County's inspection effort; Todd indicated that he would ask the Developer to reconsider this stance for the road and drainage portion of this phase. 4. The following were agreed to: a. The contractor (KC Construction) would be able to apply for a "suicide" permit prior to resubmittal of the corrected plan set. b. This phase would, for the time being, remain under the "old" review and inspection system. c. The County will place this submittal at the top of the priority list for review 5. Todd requested that we meet at 1:30 p.m. on 8 June 95 to discuss and briefly review the corrected plan set submittal for phase 1. MEMO DATE: June 1, 1995 TO: Dennis Scott FROM: Bill Johns B RE: Riverway Villa PUD After our meetings with IPEC and with Bill Hemmings/Ed Parry I reviewed all the comments and a letter to and from North Idaho Engineering. After this research I believe that Bill Hemmings and Ed Parry acted in the best interests of Spokane County and within the range of existing policy. The comments to NIE were professional and in almost all cases suggested guidance as to possible remedies of problems commented on. There appeared to be a great deal of confusion on the part of NIE as to the plat requirements and the use of our policies and guidelines. We will work with the Engineer and Developer to get his roads paved as quickly as possible without compromising Spokane County's position. This project will have a high priority. In reviewing this project it has come to light that it is very difficult for a Engineer who is unfamiliar with Spokane County procedures to successfully navigate our policies and procedures. As time allows we will be updating our policies and procedures in order to help solve this problem. I will give you an estimated completion date as we get a better idea of what personpower we can apply to this rewrite. RECEIVED INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL 2 21995 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -6844 TO: Spokane County - VIA FAX 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 ATTENTION: Ed Parry, P.E. Description: o Blueline Prints • Copy of Letter o Original Drawing 0 Contract - Documents o Work Authorization 0 Report No. Copies Description 1 Copy Quit Claim Deed for property in the NE quadrant of Mission and Barker Roads Purpose • Information o Review & Comments o o Written Approval 0 Signature & Return 0 Remarks Ed: Per our earlier conversations regarding the ownership of the commercial lot in the Riverwalk PUD, please find enclosed a copy of a quit claim deed which conveyed the commercial lot from the Dean Building Corporation to Wel1Co. This should help resolve the issue regarding frontage improvements on property that is not owned or controlled by the Riverwalk Sponsor. Should ou have any questions regarding this issue or any other issue of this projec please do of ' to ca . Signed: Todd R. Whipple, P.E. enclosure cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineering Services Department DATE r May ;;19 1995,, I PE C PROJECT PROJECT NAME:' Riverwalk P,UD_ 71414 o Original Documents 0 0 'Dew mr rnUNTY ENGINEER o E a N FAX COVER SHEET REMARKS: itT -r-ncc 0 STYEToN D' 7° 5-c r Ld . DATE: - 3 - 3 - 9 s ATTENTION: o '7 77 c/` 7t, i aC 1A-LAS o;:c . COMPANY: - ir� - n porc-'c fgerc rc te-5 FAX NUMBER: S — ` s - 6 fr 11� FROM: ED DEAN NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover sheet): 1 5 iti Cz. c- (T C. L. .h-c p fZJ -r, c t o lice s pc-z- t< -rn 5-c_ c_ c o • C ,1.o• -ate 114-e--- • Pcr "rbft -fC c_ -- r. CA-05 p u .tc s � /1/4 , - rift n–c.0 54- 2 'f-s -r- po E-5 Moo ct.De4 -7 C ✓i__ >e 4.° ✓ et-T11 CA" -mot_ 1 le-- yon t ling ezx ioN s / J 1 " ICS P.O. Boa 488 Bellevue, WA 98009 Tel. (206) 869-6618 Fax 1206) 869 - 6620 < 4. SE O E I'vt.I! FILED an I :Ai:tl:o WHEN RECORDED RBTJRN TO Cegd l t � k om Taylor Raton Montgomery, k Austin 5800 Columbia Center 701 Fifth Avcut Seattle, WA 98104 „ ❑t . maftMfRICI THIS SPACIZ n O JI]RG jrOt ELEICQRDtiRS tISS rd '511 1t,. , an I 140520O4183Pet.ac , Cbex ; It xsa. —_yfli,1601Pia 811 QUIT CLAIM DEED The Grantor, STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY a Wtubinggttan general partnership, on Its nwn behalf and as nominee for £TANTONSPOKANE 1.P a Washington limited permeably, conveys and quit claims to WEL CO GROUP,. NC., a Washington corporation, the racy/fog described real mono, Situated n the County of kane, State of Washington, ingather with all after aegtdred tine of the grantor therein: A tract of land situate Section 7t, Township 23 Norm Range 45 East, W.M. County of Spokane, State of Washington, descrtbed s follows; A portion of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest Tortes of sold Section 8, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest comer of said Section 8 which Is marked by Spokane County bran cap at the intarseulon of Mission and Barker Ronda, sold paint being the true point of beginning of the land hereinafter described; Thence along the Westerly Mae of said Section 8 Nardi 003503" West 888.91 feet; Thence departing said westerly lino Nardi R91.7 East 40030 fact; Theme South 29•361.6" Bast 213.93 fun; Thence South OE•00'OP Wait 706.49 feet In a paint an the Southerly Uae of saW Scrtlon 8; Thence North 89'56'S0a Wog 498.99 feel to sho true point �ofob . geginning !�I � also the right.of way of Mission Road. Barker Read 009.000 nom 05/23/1994 1325 TRANsWERIcn TITLE Doted: M% /2 , 1994. Ylll. I. O O 1 PAGE 815 STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ON ITS OWN BEHALF . AND AS NOMINEB FOR STANTCNSPOKANE, LP., a Washington limited partnership Dy DEAN DUII.DINO CORPORATION, a Washington corporation and a gcnaruI partner of Stanton Dew:topment Company G By: .+a . Edward Dean, Proximo / By: 110USLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION a Washington corporation and o general partner of Stanton Developm 1 Company OUITa 1N Donn Byr STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF ICING On this /a day of 1'994, helm me personally appeared P. EDWARD DEAN, to arse now a Ilia President of DP.AN BUILDING CORPORATION resident of IOUS n Wushdng cu �rn nlinn and IIRIAN I IOUSLEY to Inc known to be the I.RY DEVELOPMuwr CORPORATION a Washington corporation, the corporations that executed the wtthln and fora ipnrament as the General Partners aaSTANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, o Washington Amaral partncnitip, as nominee fat Stanton-Spokane LP is Wusltlng tun limited partnership, and ucknnwtcdgc4 saki imtrumant to he the t ree and voluntary net and deed of their respeetivo corporatlutu and sail generul and Limited pnrinenhips, fur the uses and purposes therein mentions!, nod on oath stated that they were authorized to executu said Instrument uttd that the seals tt(tlsed, Ir any, are the corporate scale of said corporatism. IN WTTNIi9S WHEREOF 1 huve hereunto sat my hand and talked my offetal seal the day and your first above written. 1 ss. 509 926 w 19 P.02 Name: CAMILLB TAY Lon RALSTON Notary Public, State of Washlpgta My appointment expires .40,//37•r Page 2 Ed: Signed: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -6844 TO: Spokane County - VIA FAX 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 ATTENTION: Ed Parry, P.E. Description: o Blueline Prints • Copy of Letter o Original Drawing o Contract Documents o Work Authorization 0 Report No. Copies Description 1 Copy Quit Claim Deed for property.in the NE quadrant of Mission and Barker Roads Purpose • Information o Written Approval Remarks o Review & Comments 0 o Signature & Return o Per our earlier conversations regarding the ownership of the commercial lot in the Riverwalk PUD, please find enclosed a copy of a quit claim deed which conveyed the commercial lot from the Dean Building Corporation to WellCo. This should help resolve the issue regarding frontage improvements on property that is not owned or controlled by the Riverwalk Sponsor. Should ou have any questions regarding this issue or any other issue of this projec please do of t to c Todd R. Whipple, P.E enclosure cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineering Services Department DATE May' 1.9 P.E C PROJECT t PROJECTNAME Rl.y PU D o Original Documents 0 0 MAY 1 q 1995 SKIIC: :,........ ENGINEER DATE: ATTENTION: COMPANY: FAX NUMBER: FROM: o e a N FAX COVER SHEET NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover sheet): REMARKS: $f - ! s c t"1 cl S Pr—t-C -T I ore- • Pcr "r TL wx. -t- c..- t._ C4_05 � t l9 -T I.{'E- . Pu ✓tt (-t st s 4-, Sh• - r - K-t 5+ - f-S a it U1uo7° €5 Nat c )-4 c2x4t� IJ 3- '3o -9C So, — ¥fR _ 6 S ED DEAN P.O. Box 488 Bellevue. WA 98009 TeL (206) 869.6618 Fox 1206) 869 - 6620 C /L. 1-77 • C t.Z _ LAL:Asa et . A fZti rr C L Art co C r! o•-aa r • c' 161 %Oa RECEm.lt FILED Oa ni aat:nLo WHEN RECORDED RWIURN To Conine Taylor Ralston BSla �ktLuhllp k Purdue, 380p Columbia Center 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 YUUU nna11ctilAntrk T IlS SPACE M�1r R2ED R fn CQ 1 QR'S uati 11.... L1D ' - 5 . FI 1 )40520 ()41f5POrad1. C4ai; Yasll. ______Im.1801na 814 QUIT CIAIM DEED The Grantor, STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY a Washington geaeal partnership, on Its nwn behalf end as nominee for STANTON-SPOKANE/ 1 P a Washingan Unites! partnership, conveys and quit cbdau to WEI. CO GROUP INC., • Washington corponttlun, tha following described real estate, situated GROUP, the County of Spokane, State of Wnshingtou, Ingather with all after acquhrA title of the grantor afieainr A tract of land situate Section 8, Township 25 North. Range 45 East, W.M. County of Spokane, State of Washington, dcscrlhcd as follows: A portion of the Southwest gunner of the Southwest quarter of said Section 8, more particularly described as follow: Commenting at the Southwest owner of said Section 8 which is marked by a Spokane County bran cap at the intencetlan of Minion and Barter Roads, said point being the true print of beginning of the land hen:Mallet Tlsenee along the Westerly Nan of sukl Suction 8 North 007503" West 888,91 Ices; 7lroneo departing said westerly tine North 8729'05 than 40030 fact; Therms South 275626' Eau 213.93 fact; Thence South 00"00'04' West 70449 fat In a point on the Bovtharly Una of said Section 8 Therese North 8T3950" West 498.99 feet to tlw uuo point of beginning. Fatoa deg therefrom the right-of-way of Barker Road and elm Ow right-of-way of Inion Road. 009d007745 Thu alfEEIEt 23/1954 1325 TRANEIVER ICA TITLE QurrQaMDamn 509 926 a L9 YOL16 O 1 PAaE 815 Doted: May 12 , 1'994. STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ON ITS OWN BEHALF AND AS NOMINpts FOR STANTON-SPOKANE, LAP., a Washington IIm110d pnnnershlp By: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, a Washington corporation anti u general partner of Stanton Development Company Dy: Edward Dena, lima to By 11OUSI.BY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION n Washington corporation end a general partner of S Developm . 1 Company • Sys SPATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF ICING ss. On tiro /a day of 1994, hcfure me persann appeared P. EDWARD D , to me n0W tha Presklent of DEAN B UILDING CORPORATION, n Washington corporation and BRIAN IIOUSLSY to Inc known to its the President 011LOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION a Washington corporation, the corporations the! executed the within end firs Innrumanfas the General Panncrs of STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, n Washington general partnership, as nominee fat StuntnnSpnknne LP a Washinggton Ifinited partnership, and acknowledged saki hutrument to he duxfroo mod minatory act and deed of their respective corporations and said gonna and limited partnerships, Inr the uses and purposes thumin mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute sold Instrument and that the deals affixed, If any, are the corporate seals of said corporations. IN WCINESS WHEREOF I have hereunto sot my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. P. 92 Name: CAMILLE TAYLOR RALSTON Notary Public, State of Washingto My appointment expires ex//37 1V' Page 2 . MAY -19 -1995 10:37 (LAND PACIFIC ENG INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL TO: Spokane County - VIA FAX 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 ATTENTION: Ed Parry, P.E. Description: 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA (509)458 -6840 Fax: (5091456 -8844 o Blueline Prints • Copy of Letter o Original Documents o Original Drawing o Contract Documents 0 o Work Authorization 0 Report o No. Copies Description 1 Copy Quit Claim Deed for property in the NE quadrant of Mission and Barker Roads Purpose o Information o Review & Comments o o Written Approval 0 Signature & Return o Remarks Ed: Per our earlier conversations regarding the ownership of the commercial lot in the Riverwalk PUD, please find enclosed a copy of a quit claim deed which conveyed the commercial lot from the Dean Building Corporation to WellCo. This should help resolve the issue regarding frontage improvements on property that is not owned or controlled by the Riverwalk Sponsor. Should ou have any questions regarding this issue or any other issue of this projec please do of sitate to Signed: Todd R. Whi le, P.E. enclosure cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineering Services Department t P.01 MAY -19 -1995 10:37 DATE: ATTENTION: COMPANY: FAX NUMBER: FROM: VLAND PACIFIC ENG o E a N aer FAX COVER SHEET 3 -'3o --9S 7-o p 5'oy — ¥s- ( t'. ED DEAN NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover sheet): P.O. Box 489 Bete+0s. WA 98009 Tel (206) 8694618 Fez 12061 8eB-662o P. 02 c / c . 79 0I c..oC ~Ken( f Ar (ma c e REMARKS: 6q- rnrc s A s4 r r G coz-t frfuK Stu te( 9 Pc'i - t-C c /Loc - I1yL • Pc -r -r rt'—t rJ L GLG at - - r - spe Pu rtc. r r % 511 SI1/4"-� - ref - 6 jj a..t 5 Iteer2 S s - F iotc DC C/Co . po Qc5 MOT- a )e4 y o Let �4+1� Rbt� .e � �OHS « 1 J - CS <4 MAY -19 -1995 10:38 • \LAND PACIFIC ENG REM RECORDED aunan TO RECENLf FILED Olt ni :oRnt'D „hewn r T W atACrTint wrests ests Cemdlletaylor Rskaoa vs. N1 w Ip (urduue )4os2ppgtserot►et.Ci,n;. Austin Columbia I Wilt Menus aster Seattle, WA ORIN �t ,1 G 01 t•AGE 814 QUIT CLAIM DEED lb Cantos, STAN'PON DgVELDPME1NT COMPANY a WarhiVnqt,mn Deli =ship, oe ie Curti beUdf end as twmlaa far S rA M I O N'8P'OKANS T ? t Wamin Iha rd psrtnanhlp, eoe'ey WW qek cWa to WEL CO OlibUil INC. a **sideman corporation, the following described .dt a m anta Woad In the (bump of Spokane, State of Warblogio�t Iuga eaptbad tide of the rumor Stain hh W1 mn(Spnktme State of Was on, dm Env Ent, A polkas at Ea Southwest quarter et the Seuthweet Tartar of said $eotloe & more particularly described u W. Commmcblp at the Soath.en cored of aid &Woe S width b marked by • Spokane County bran cap at the Intanmba et Mtrden aad Buts Raub, mid palm betels the true point bf hoglnntep of the Thom along the Westerly tae or WI Section 8 North 1347318" Vico 88$91 iota, Three p b L rdneafd westerly u a SOOSII floras Saab 2•16'• East 21533 fen; Them Sao b 01700,4* Won 9 fort to a the ccalberd Ilan mid Section 6I pots on Them North B 'WSO Wan 59899 feet to Rut tnm OM of beginning. Emoptleg therefrom the sight•dosoy 'sr Bator Road nod olio the rtahtoS ny of NW= 1 and 00g4007745 mum P.03 MAY-19-1995 10:38 NLAND PACIFIC ENG 05. 2 .' 1994 13 :25 lizzEn FR I O TITLE Oman = Dean 509 926 .9 Br HOWLEY DEVELOPhil3NT CORPORATION, Stanton Washington Davalop Company BY' i �, �L Br c>ustc9, �t STATE 0? WASHINGTON 4 COUNTY OP KING ante: CAMtL.LETAY RAN Notary Public, Smta of %Wa taL_ My appnlntataal mph= A9 /arc s7'/ 3' Dated: May 1994 YOI. 16 d 1 PAGE 815 STANTON NO FOR STANTON 3,, �L.PP., a Wanldnpon limned partnership Dr DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, a Washing= cmporatlon and a general partner of Stanton Devatopmem Company /eee � 3r C r �w 1� D award Dna, i'tmkte+ v / / P.02 Oa dals 2! da d 1794, before Inc peaanaly mated P. EDWARD DFMN. to me w the President of DEAN BUDDING CORPORATION, a WasaNgtoa a gwntioa, and BRIAN MUSLIN, RY co Eno kno�ra in ha the Pre:Haat oil 1OUSLEY D[IVLLCFMI*ff CORPORAL I0 a Washingtae atryntatk n, tits anrporatlom that aaatted the within and faro iasrruaant as the General Panacea ofSTAWI ON DEVEWPMENTCOMP Y, a Washington p�artial permeably, as nominee fat SttedunSpnkaae LP a Wastage= limited partnership, oat acknowledged sah1 hnlnuoant to ha dm and voluntary so and decd of their respective ear}a ratbtaa and said general and Limited partnershlm, fat the uas anti purposes Marcia tnondnuss, nod on oath vaned that May were autluntbcd to maim snit hmrvmont and that the goals tdlleol, N srry, are the commit* saris of said eorpatatkm olDeid s t aSa WHEREOF bav have hereunto Tot my bawl cad ati cad my Pap 2 P.04 Reference Calculations I P »nt c, S MO 1 l is' y it 76 2tu t . Ct s. L! [1J st. GI.IT ■IL LJ I - i i I ' I i Lam' Lo' ■■ ■ ?law mi L us72 zt Cu To .! Ca cMiec 11 toie r� . -Ylti, ■ ■■ • f �� I fi 4 .. 4- N J ■ L:• ■�� ■ L ■ ■I 13"s?vtl✓L 651 ( Hp /11 1 rt t e 1 J t { - , `_ L cr ■ a [J II 137. . 1 LL ■ 1 /PG dog j eliff t� L_J ��i. 'J � I■ aZ ,. (w .� o [ ,1 i i tat i f � I� �4 i r�. L .� ,� �,�,t�� Ls 1 I 4 i j A 0, y � L LJ T l L1J I I , LJ ■■ \■ ■ ■ ■■ IH� J ■ 11 Ti] 1 J •■ J '. I i ll I i ■ [I 4 6 -o' 4 Witt. (�4,... J 1i I CO14 H 1Ab efriii-ati r IT H V r 1 t--° LL-1 4 . ) aJ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■ , t , ,_n wall 2w ,) rAnn ftik IU■■■I ..1 1 ■ Ia ] LN LC t F. r�. C � . v-- i I ■ f l,l. t Z r ■ 4 I ■■ [:1 31 - J LJ 11 LJ ■ ■ z �■ 1 1.1 E LULL [1 L 3i T t ri l a it ■■■ ■■ t I I L 1 I I -1 11 - Li 1 ir ■ ■ LI 1 L.. J L1 L ' 1 • 11 LJ SPOKANE COUNTY Dal Dal OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS CALCULATION SHEET Description: r fi 6 (Acct t &Ltce - wTs A9mun ) Calc by Checked by: Notes: P:1(4- Project No.: Title: Sheet of SPOKANE COUNTY Description: Calc. by: Checked by: Notes: NM■MI■ .■■N■■■■■■. MINIMS ■ ■■.N■■■■ MH p ■I■■■■■ ! ■ ■■■■■■ �■I■■M■M !_' r ■ ■■■■■■N NI■N■■ _ _. ■ M.NN■N ■■ •■Nil■uua■ - i N , • ■ • ■ .■ ■..... • T �. LSD + N■i ■N M■■ Eat I V i i i N . � i • ■■I■■ u ■■I� ■ ■ ■• ■■ ■ mum an: ■1■■fl. ■ I < . ■ ■ • • N I■ ■ ■.I�NM ■■1 N.I. • alp 1 111 ,... .... ... .. ammairat I II. I 1111111 Immo 111.....11 • ill II . • .1 II NNE MIENNEEMMEMOIINNIMMEM NM ENEmm EN =NM= Refe —4 1 If x'619 CoICUlatI0n8 f o2 sl RW • U" 1 dl cite k 5b I yl 1 (7 1 di CI Atha - I • CALCULATION SHEET MQit Outt.4t(1 Date: Date: OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS AI4-l1- Project No.: Title: Sheet of z00 o , c 0 n ^ V 00 0 0 ID m 0 to O z z m 0 c z OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS Li n r -� erence - LJ LJ ■ L ex PA Li LJ Co r r �J I f -� L br - j s, 1 ,iow Li -1- L� F S J _1 —� CA LI i ?VG ---l- 1 %Vedt9 r_ CA-t- L] i1 L f L J �I -I _J LJ LL L L 1 r LL L LL C Ll LJ otlona LJ L_ Li LI L Li Li �rL [L 1 LJ Fl LL f 1 CL J LJ L _1 LL Li Li LI ❑ rL LL Li LJ LJ LJ Li ,1 L J L1_l L LJ LL LL 1L I I z00 o , c 0 n ^ V 00 0 0 ID m 0 to O z z m 0 c z OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS Memorandum Date: January 17, 1995 To: Bill Hemmings From: Ed Parry �5(i Subject: P1414 - Riverwalk (formerly Riverway Villa) Design Deviations 1. North Idaho Engineering recently (Dec 94 submitted several design deviations for this project, related to road section configuration on Barker Road and on Mission Avenue, and for the road alignment of Indiana at its intersection with Barker Road. 2. We should provide these recommendations to the County Engineer a. Proposed Mission Avenue Section: Recommend APPROVAL, with conditions In August 1994, the County provided a Special Road Section to NIE for Mission Avenue, east of Barker Road (approved by the Co. Engr. on 17 Aug 94) - copy attached. This section showed a 5:1 slope from the back of curb (= R /W) to the bottom of the 208 swale /snow storage area, with additional volume (and area) as needed for storm runoff to be located in an easement outside the future acquisition area. This section is similar to the road section details in the revised SCRS. NIE proposes a 10:1 slope from the back of curb to the Future Acquisition limit, with a 5:1 slope from the Future Acquisition Limit to the floor of the 208 swale /snow storage area. The section provided for Mission Avenue would require a swale that is between 0.5' and 0.9' deeper (as a minimum) than the proposed section; this would require an additional 2' to 4' width for the drainage & sidewalk easement. More importantly, the proposed section would result in better control of runoff from the public R /W, since the back of the sidewalk would be high enough to force excess runoff from a major event or drywell failure to stay within the road section, instead of overflowing the sidewalk and draining into residential yards or commercial lots. This Design Deviation request should be approved, subject to the designer providing adequate 208 and storm volume storage so that the maximum stormwater surface elevation in the swale area does not encroach on the Future Acquisition limit. The Special Section for Mission Avenue (East of Barker Road) should be revised accordingly. r P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. Design Deviation Requests Page 2 of 3 b. Proposed Barker Road Section: Recommend DENIAL In August 1994, the County provided a Special Road Section to NIE for Barker Road (approved by the Co. Engr. on 4 Aug 94) - copy attached. This section showed a 5:1 slope from the back of curb (= R /W) to the bottom of the 208 swale /snow storage area, with additional volume (and area) as needed for storm runoff to be located in an easement outside the future acquisition area. This section is similar to the road section details in the revised SCRS. NIE proposes a 10:1 slope from the back of curb to the Future Acquisition limit, with a 5:1 slope from the Future Acquisition limit to the floor of the 208 swale /snow storage area. The section provided for Mission Avenue would require a swale that is between 0.5' and 0.9' deeper (as a minimum) than the proposed section; this would require an additional 2' to 4' width for the drainage & sidewalk easement. The proposed section would result in the same degree of control of runoff from the public R /W, since the back of the sidewalk is at the same elevation (with respect to the road centerline) in both the Special Section provide by the County and in the proposed section By NIE. The sidewalk in either section would be high enough to force excess runoff from a major event or drywell failure to stay within the road section, instead of overflowing the sidewalk and draining into residential yards or commercial lots. This Design Deviation request should not be approved, since no appreciable benefit is realized by the County. c. Proposed Indiana Avenue alignment at Barker Road intersection: Recommend DENIAL NIE proposes to construct Indiana Avenue with a median at the intersection of Indiana Avenue and Barker Road, in order to install an entrance sign for the P.U.D.. There are no apparent plans to install access gates to this development. Indiana Avenue is a public Collector Arterial which passes through this development, roughly bisecting the site north and south. The P.U.D. boundary would extend to the north and south R/W lines for Indiana. Although the proposed entrance sign location does not appear to impact sight distance needs at this stop - controlled intersection, entrance signs for private developments are more appropriately located at the private road approaches to the P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. Design Deviation Requests Page 3 of 3 public road, within the boundaries of the private development. There is no apparent need for a median to channelize traffic at this location. Additionally, "decorative" median strips (which are not needed for traffic channelization) on public roads leading to private developments historically have not been maintained by the private development, and tend to become an eyesore (e.g., at the Fairways Golf Course). Winter plowing operations will also be adversely affected by this median. The available turning radius from Barker Road, and the radius around the median may impact emergency vehicle access. The 200' radius around the median is considerably less than the 715' minimum horizontal curve required for this Collector Arterial. The only other notable median on a public road exists at the entrance to Camelot Subdivision form U.S. 2. This median, however is located on a local access road, not an arterial. This Design Deviation request should be denied: There is no apparent traffic channelization requirement; emergency vehicle access and snowplowing operations will be adversely affected; and entrance signs for private developments are more appropriately located within the boundaries of the private development. 1 ROAD NAME Mission Avenue ROAD WIDTH ROAD SURFACE AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC SUBMITTED BY North Idaho Engineering, Inc. ADDRESS 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2, Coeur d'Alene, ID PF E* (208) 667 !. • tTT /nTTCPTI Y IN ••••••••••• i• rte• REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION 530.00 - - --- -- -REQUEST WILL NOT BE REVIEWED WTIHC TC FUNDS- DATE 12/1/94 CRP/RID # NAME OF PLAT Riverwalk First Addition plat* P1414/9 ADDRESS OF BLDG NAME OF BLDG PROJECT BLDG# B9 S _ T _ R FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT # PROJECT LIMITS EXISTING CONDITIONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: 56' Pavement 600 Vehicles /day Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count PROJECT DESCRIPTION Urban Housing Development PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION Design deviation from the typical street section p`r. by the office of Spokane County Engineers. We propose a deviation fi.,m the slope of 5:1 from the back of curb to the flow line to 10:1 to the - future acquisition area then contimn=ing at a 511 to the flow line. JUSTIFICATION: Changing the slope to a 10:1 to the future acquisition will decrease the vertical drop to the flow line from the curb by 1.3' while providing - separation between the future acquisition and tfie 208 treatment area The adequate snow and storm storage along with 208 treatment will bemaintained without the unnecessary vertical drop. DATE 12/9/94 " ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF $30.00 PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY - ZIP CODE 8 3814 i -1_ /J C, SECTION LINE MISSION AVENUE (SYMJ Irk FX!5flU z PAVE•tM —t12 -{ EXISTING R/W 20' 30' TRAFFIC TRAFFIC RRURE ACQUISITION R/W 10' „Al / 10, MIN SLOPE TO 2% MIN. I ` . / FUTURE AGO 5-61 B TYPE 'B' CUR - " TG - 1.00' - ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT . GL 'A' 4" (MIN) - 5 1/2' CRUSHED SURFACING / TO - P COURSE Oradd iD is (0 114 /7I%7I(NN) IDEWALK 2% MIN. 208 TREA AND SNOW STS' TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION FROM THE OFFICE OF SPOKANE cowry- ENGINEER T IO' LANDSCALED TRACT - 25' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, 0'— 25' OR SLOPE GATGH DRAIIIA&E, AND UTILITY POINT WHIGHEVER 15 EAGR-ENT. GREATER i 2F \-T/C. * Oa' ' A= 4 OwatePs ? FoQE 5 cet4& bc€5 -- MILL W tOM btu+ S IITI(,12EA IN THE eve cr A 1M 'e utirr. 2F W twee, B acts, TFtrx'I. Wan" T SEAS enkt CF 4AROS 14� IY LI T 'I Tn 0G EXISTING GROUND 5 TO 0.a -MIN. SWALE DEPTH = TG - 2.00' -LOCATE LOCATE DRYHLI 1 5 AS SHOWN ON PLANS MISSION AVENUE ( oP , J GRATE ELEVATION F 051-- G' 1k1 MISSION AVENUE (SYM.) C/L 12' 0 TRAFFIC 2Z 12' T AFFIC , IN CSTC PER R —VALUE TESTING U1r tande00115 BIKE LANE 4' 2' NEW R/W —ACP CL. "A " (rein.) ACP CL. "E" TOTAL ACP DEPTH 10 FUTURE ACQUISITION TYPE '3" CURB 208 TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE SLOPE WIOTH AS REQUIRED _J EASEMENT DRAINAGE AND SIDEWALK mom . _EASEMENT AS NEEDED 4:� 6' 2' SIDEWALK 4-50,46 34: CF SL &t)N k k. 15 /o+Jee MAN ) gnat Cw.0 gtra 4/11201/eatisloult cots #d [Merl ' a&Yweu- elec S oR A 4VJt2 S?Sejt 449 to u✓e5 COSTING GROUND 5:1 T /C +0.2' 1 6" MINIMUM WATER DEPTH FOR 208 2. 0.9' MINIMUM DEPTH FOR STORM VOLUME(-3. MAXIMUM WATER SURFACE ELEVATION DOES NOT ENCROACH ON FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA Drawn By: Date: E.J.P. 08/94 Designed By E.J.P. 08/94 Checked By: SCALE HORIZONTAL: NONE VERTICAL: NONE OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER W. 1026 BROADWAY AVE. SPOKANE. WA. 99260 -0170 4 56 - 3600 APPRO VED:QI COUNTY ENGINEER Date: as, i 7 195 c1 VISSION AVENUE EAST OF BARKER ROAD TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION SHEET 1 o f XSEC0045.DWG March 13, 1995 Mr. Pat Harper Spokane County Engineering Department 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 Re: Riverway Villa Project Dear John: Please be advised that we have hired Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. as a project consultant on the above project. We therefore request that you copy them with all correspondence related to this project and to provide them with any information which they may request. Their address is 707 West 7th, Suite 200, Spokane WA 99204. Their phone number is (509) 458 -6840 and their fax number is 458 -6844. Please direct to correspondence to the attention of Mr. Richard Mason. We appreciate your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, 1 ...... se Edward Dean Stanton Spokane Limited Partnership by Dean Building Corporation cc: Mr. Richard Mason Stanton Spokane Limited Partnership 16720 Northeast 116th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 (206) 869-6618 Fax: 869 -6620 x` ?k4 t RECEIVED MAR 1 7 1995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER March 13, 1995 Mr. Pat Harper Spokane County Engineering Department 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 Re: Riverway Villa Project Dear John: Please be advised that we have hired Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. as a project consultant on the above project. We therefore request that you copy them with all correspondence related to this project and to provide them with any information which they may request. Their address is 707 West 7th, Suite 200, Spokane WA 99204. Their phone number is (509) 458 -6840 and their fax number is 458 -6844. Please direct to correspondence to the attention of Mr. Richard Mason. We appreciate your consideration in this matter. Sincerely,. Edward Dean Stanton Spokane Limited Partnership by Dean Building Corporation cc: Mr. Richard Mason Stanton Spokane Limited Partnership 16720 Northeast 116th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 (206) 869 -6618 Fax: 869 -6620 ? \ coot Ir rii SPCKAfqE OC,,ifl f _NC- VEER March 13, 1995 Mr. Pat Harper Spokane County Engineering Department 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 Re: Riverway Villa Project Dear John: Please be advised that we have hired Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. as a project consultant on the above project. We therefore request that you copy them with all correspondence related to this project and to provide them with any information which they may request. Their address is 707 West 7th, Suite 200, Spokane WA 99204. Their phone number is (509) 458 -6840 and their fax number is 458 -6844. Please direct to correspondence to the attention of Mr. Richard Mason. We appreciate your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Stanton Spokane Limited Partnership 16720 Northeast 116th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 (206) 869 -6618 Fax: 869 -6620 Edward Dean Stanton Spokane Limited Partnership by Dean Building Corporation cc: Mr. Richard Mason SPC;;I(t; CC' U ^!i( f1GiPJ'c R 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 * Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208)664 -3507 To: Spokane County Engineers Date: 2/23/95 ATTN: Ed Parry From: Ellen Bickerstaff for James O. Morris REF: Riverwalk 1" Addition We are Transmitting: *Status* X Herewith Proposed For Information Separate Cover Preliminary As requested Via Mail Progress Your Files Delivery X Revised Your Submittal Personal Pickup X Final Checking Fedex As -built X Approval UPS For Payment Your Use Other Partial Other The Following: Specific Items: X Drawings X Calculations Report Letter Maps Check $ Plans X See at Right Please: Message: Call immediately Call after review X Call, if questions Respond in writing X Process your end Forward as Reqd. Review /Comment No action reqd. NORT'W'DAHO ENGINEERIN.a, INC. TRANSMITTAL 2 Sets Revised Plans (in color). 2 Copies Hydrology Calculations. 1 Copy Retaining Wall Calculations. 1 Set Original Redlines. rti Job No: 4004 T(414- i W ;.4,c60 1 FEB 2 3 1995 SPpiti4iL Luuid r ENGINEER NORTOPIDAHO ENGINEERII*, INC. 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 * Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208)664 -3507 To: Spokane County Planning Attn: Mike Nicholson Ref: Riverwalk We are Transmitting X Herewith Separate Cover Via Mail X Delivery Personal Pickup Fedex UPS Other The Following Drawings Calculations Report Letter Maps Check $ Plans X See at Right Please Call Immediately Call after review X Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Regd. Review /Comment No Action Reqd. • TRANSMITTAL Proposed Preliminary In Progress Revised Final As -Built For Payment Partial 2/7/95 Job No. 4004 oil z 13 en tik za 7 3; 0 n om CO Y O i P al Z From: James O. Morris a •Fi *Status* X For Information As requested Your Files Your Submittal Checking Approval Your Use Other Specific Items: 1 Copy Sewer Extension Plans. 1 Copy Street Plans - 2nd Addition. 1 Copy Street Plans - 3rd Addition. 1 Copy Hydrology Studier{l fittU C N ST ‘ 414 \S en*S1 :105 Message: Sewer plans have been submitted to Utilities Department & Street and Hydro Plans have been submitted to Engineering. • By: 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 * Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 * Phone (208) 667 -1171 * Fax (208)664 -3507 To: Spokane County Engineering Attn: Ed Parry Ref: Riverwalk 2nd & 3rd Addition We are Transmitting X Herewith Separate Cover Via Mail X Delivery Personal Pickup Fedex UPS Other The Following Drawings Calculations Report Letter Maps Check $ Plans X See at Right Please Call Immediately Call after review X Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Reqd. Review /Comment No Action Reqd. NORM IDAHO ENGINEERII*, INC. By: TRANSMITTAL 2/7/95 From: James O. Morris Job No. 4004 *Status* X Proposed For Information Preliminary As requested In Progress Your Files Revised Your Submittal Final X Checking As -Built X Approval For Payment _ Your Use Partial Other Specific Items: 2 sets street improve plans 2nd Addition. Agreement to pay fees -2nd Addition. 2 sets street improvement plans -3rd Addition. Agreement to pay fees -3rd Addition. 2- hydrology study -3rd Add. RECFWV FEB 0 9 1695 TAD, SPOKA■il i,uu,a i i.UINEER e Message: a IA'{ ., ,/ 2LA p, `? evet p (3) The plans for the 2nd Addition have been revised per developers request. Please review these plans dated 2/7/95 and not the previously submitted plans. North Idaho Engineeri> Inc. 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208) 664 - 3507 DEC 121994 TRANSMITTAL COi.. ft vT County Attn: Ref: Planning Dept. Mike Nicholson Riverwalk Second Addition The Following Drawings Calculations Report Letter Maps Check $ Plans X See at Right Date: Please Message: Call immediately Call after review X Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Regd. Review /Comment No action Regd. From: 12/9/94 James 0. Morris We are transmitting *Status* X Herewith Proposed For Information Separate Cover Preliminary As requested Via Mail ' In Progress Your Files X Delivery Revised Your Submittal Personal Pickup Final X Checking Fedex As -built X Approval UPS For Payment Your Use Other Partial Other Specific Items: 1 copy Street & Storm Drainage Improvement Plans 1 copy Hydrology Study By: ��arre Job no. 4004 RECEIVED DEC 2 2 1994 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER V NortlRdaho Engineering, Inc. 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208) 664 -3507 TRANSMITTAL To: Spokane County Date: 12/9/94 Job no. 4004 Engineering Dept. Attn: Ed Parry, P.E. Ref: Riverwalk Second Addition We are transmitting *Status* X Herewith Proposed For Information Separate Cover Preliminary As requested Via Mail ' In Progress Your Files X Delivery Revised Your Submittal Personal Pickup Final X Checking Fedex As -built X Approval UPS For Payment Your Use Other Partial Other The Following Specific Items: Drawings 2 copies Street & Storm Drainage Calculations Improvement Plans Report 2 copies Hydrology Study Letter Maps Check $ Plans X See at Right Please Message: Call immediately Call after review X Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Reqd. Review /Comment No action Reqd. From: James 0. Morris DE;; I '6S., SPOMMAltt Ucddi i .u, .. By: 1 FEB- 8 - 95 WED 2:06 PM NORTT' 'DAD ENGINEERING FAX NO. 20 '64 3507 P. North Idaho Engineering, Inc. 4200 Seitice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208) 664 -3507 + 222# 3#223333322:133333322222 *f222 ** ** 1232122222322333.[22323222223 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL 333Y:123333:1E13X # ## 4222X3J:i313**122:k231:12c32 #1x2211133 1444327327212 PAGE: (1) OF 2 DATE SENT: 2 /n /9S J.N. �� COMPANY -/''/�)/2 RQIf -v C90, )L Iaf P�j�i h� ATTN: FO fairy J ✓ REF: /l .�✓i! u 4 / Q' //t 7/E.Cdo`nb/. CX): C 3 URGENT C ] REVIEW AND RESPOND C ] NORMAL/TODAY C ] PER YOUR REGUEST C 3 APPROVAL C ] CONFI DENTIAL C ] INFORMATION Cf1 OTHER: P /pose /nrhv,.e 044A ...46M: 41-a/ REGARDINGn PE f7GMp Or' #yard /oy7 i Y U� y SENT BY : % 1- oyes (!. inn-/'f I MESSAGE: tU , /Chid° 124 S� n '7") 57 0 c4"7 . ,n//P r o -lc ,k• 46 /e, gy sfio3 ,ee /- 1-1C IL'S as a Ent/et 4r 7 ev/dz /r , y - who / 19?) illydr �J J »4 % - 2.40,! 6' .ear r e iN l /// %rove IV cn ( er r)." 11 74 is ~fir /� yov � !/ NOTE: P /ease Ca IF TRANSMISSION IS G1-EA r OR INCOMPLETE PLEASE CALL THE ABOVE LISTED TELE¢¢HONE MBER AND INFORM SENDER. FEB- 8 - 95 WED 2 :07 PM NORTT"DAHO ENGINEERING FAX NO, 2r '64 3507 P. 2 North Idaho Engineering, Inc. 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208) 664 -3507 Prepared on behalf of: PHASE III HYDROLOGY STUDY FOR RIVERWALK Edward Dean Dean Building Corp. 16720 N.E.116 th Street Redmond, WA 98052 12/18/1994 J.N. 4004 • 4 EXPIRE ii +l2 /ig NORTr. IDAHO ENGINEERIf , INC. 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 * Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 * Phone (208) 667.1171• Fax (208)664 -3507 TRANSMITTAL l � To: Spokane County Engineering Department 01/17/95 l J b No. 4004 la a rogi 1 1.1/211 1 JAN 1 8 0)5 s 8 iiati 14t-€R Attn: Ed Parry From: G.E. Siegford Ref: 1-90, East Bound Off Ramp at Barker Road, MP 293.96 We are transmitting *Status* X Herewith Proposed X For Information Separate Cover _ Preliminary X As requested X Via Mail X In Progress Your Files Delivery _ Revised _ Your Submittal _ Personal Pickup Final _ Checking Fedex _ As-Built Approval _ UPS For Payment Your Use Other _ Partial _ Other The Following Specific Items: Drawings 1 EA: Riverwalk Ramp Terminal Modification. Calculations OP /9rtvd/ 1'N /L-LI 442 Y // 54(eV 7ofM) Report R> /t. /k F / /s 1 - ,44 Letter Maps Check $ X Plans See at Right Please Message: Call Immediately Call after review Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Regd. Review /Comment X No Action Regd. By: eZ e /, Washington State W' Department of Transportation. Sid Morrison Secretary of Transportation Mr. Joseph Hassell North Idaho Engineering 4200 West Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 Dear Mr. Hassell: JCL LCC:gjb attachment cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers Project File February 3, 1995 Sincerely, J.C. LENZI Regional Administrator Eastern Region 2714 Ni. Mayfair Street Spokane. WA 99207 -2090 (509) 324-6000 Re:Riverwalk Development SR 90 Please find attached a copy of the approved intersection plan for the depicted Riverwalk ramp terminal modification. Prior to construction, a developers agreement shall be executed and a full set of construction plans will need to be submitted for review. Please contact Mark Rohwer for further details on preparing a developers agreement at 324 -6199. Also, a pre - construction conference will need to be held in advance of any construction to arrange for the necessary inspection. If you should have any questions regarding these comments please feel free to contact our Planning Office at 324 -6199. By: LEONARD CASH, PE Regional Planning Engineer MK- RECEIVED FEB 0 6 1995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER aut t; o 7;�Y5. rAU'.1Ch _3 k L _ Stlnf_: j I er_zT.w -sd tr Tr- ;YpiG.:Y_ 'RASP S -CTI 1 -90 EAST SOUND OFF -4AVF s t X'sr %G 5'5\ L- 1 _ - 1.. / 3d7.12 55.0.•.0 PROFILE P '17.2i5EP. ce.‘, =1 �oiw Y 1• s, �.- • . =� a s:6 , � _ X5.1 -_� I _ o FS a:r e.4 �925`b or 9.,000.• 6 Ssr I I.r DT D .vF 0°4 E. Ic0 c- PAY2 CDu ^ G S rai - 69 CM I 35 Y P 330[ 1 os'av 2,75`. _r r =o_n ^err FA' SS COCRO AN 'l. 310 33=P) a fn. iv^ F^ . c rPV,707CVL i ,TaXa PcPv-C1 EAST '_d ?o ,.F -,,..o n+ ov. Ce- A7 4A. WOO 31 5010--•47.547 V32. -?O2.7 513 ci:i5' SG Slat SPPE.09 - •LA51 4Q iK O; PO PV4 J 5&U.3 -0 3a02 " i0 asnn • - U e - 5 — _ s.w <nx .a rv_a.'v'- ISTL <5 _2Ci_ CF PAV_ '_X? LEGEND MSP A— es30 -c, n x S 564 POST _TAses nz ,,.F a, =. =40x, -o P5 i sr 141: =V.. nW 3.l_ ePN s, AV' 5!� r � VIcANI T Y MAP I -_ XIS ?IV _DS° GF ?AV ='Et4i I— • A LEXIS e S : SC= _1 - _ I -�9, -3. O?? 8M:? M? 293 d EN C t INS Ca5 AU 0PTLR- 2 a � __ a.5 1;5 rob LIfK yo u � �Y- GRAPHIC SCA?8 f 5 3! 53!X5 9.5 f .i 32 n 0 m 0 June 29, 1994 North Idaho Engineerin Inc. 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208) 664 -3507 County of Spokane Division of Engineering and Roads 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 Attn: Mr. Bill Hemmings Ref: Riverway Villa PE- 1414 -81, ZE- 92 -81, PUDE -1 -82 J. N.4004 RECEIVED JUN 2 91994 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Dear Mr. Hemmings, It is time to make you aware of a situation which exists, and continues to exist, within your department and has quite simply become intolerable. The Riverway Villa project was originally approved on April 2, 1982, as an affordable housing project. Since then subsequent time extensions of the project were granted. The most recent, and final granting of a time extension was granted on August 5, 1993, and expires on September 1, 1994. As a condition of this extension the Division of Engineering and Roads continued previous conditions, and specifically states: 3. As per original conditions of approval: "A traffic analysis of each phase will be required of the developer and reviewed by Spokane County prior to plat finalization ". 4. Prior to any plat checking of Riverway Villa for phased finalization of the of the plat the aforementioned analysis shall be completed. (Please note that I underlined portions of the excerpt) On April 8, 1994 the aforementioned traffic analysis for the entire Riverway Villa was completed, and on April 18, 1994 it was submitted to your department for review. The Street and Storm Drain Improvement Plans for the first phase and hydrology study was previously submitted to your department on May 11, 1993, and we received written comments from Mr. Edward Parry on August 26, 1993. It is my belief that since your department had not received. the aforementioned traffic analysis with the May 11, 1993 submittal, that this prompted you to add condition # 4 above to the time June 29, 1994 Mr. Bill Hemmings Page 2 extension request by our client. Please correct me if this is not the case. I do not know how to state the rest of this nicely, so I will just state the facts. On April 18, 1994 we submitted the revised street and storm drain improvement plans, the revised hydrology study, the completed traffic analysis, and the previous plan checking comments from the P1414 - Riverway Villa P.U.D. 1st review. It is my guess that shortly thereafter these documents were forwarded to Mr. Edward Parry for processing. The traffic analysis was not forwarded by Mr. Parry to the County Traffic Engineer until last Friday, June 24th. This action, in and of itself, is not as significant to the project as the fact that, according to Mr. Parry, some time ago he, in fact, completed his plan review of the improvement plans, and received the checking comments from the County Surveyor's office (which I have looked at in Mr. Parry's office briefly). Mr. Parry refuses to release those comments to us until the traffic analysis has been reviewed by both the County Traffic Engineer, and the Washington State Department of Transportation! At the same time he was refusing to release the plan checking comments for lack of review of the Traffic Analysis, he propitiated the lack of review by not forwarding the traffic analysis to your County Traffic Engineer. In addition, Mr. Parry has stopped the progress of the project in other areas as well. The Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvement Plans have been signed by all necessary agencies, and a Construction Permit has been applied for. Mr. Parry stopped the progress of that permit, citing a possible relocation of the intersection of Villa Avenue (formerly Indiana Avenue), due to its closeness to Baldwin Avenue, citing the county standard of a 300' minimum spacing between street centerlines on Arterial Roads (Barker Road is designated as a Principal Arterial). On March 15, 1983 a Preliminary Plat of Record was approved by Spokane County for the South 1/2 of this project. This Preliminary Plat Map scales approximately 260 linear feet between the centerlines of Baldwin Avenue and Villa Avenue (Indiana Ave). The recently approved time extension conditions of approval clearly states from the Spokane County Planning Department June 29, 1994 Mr. Bill Hemmings Page 3 condition #7 7. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee on April 14 1983. ... We measure approximately 277 linear feet in the field between the existing centerline extension of Baldwin Avenue and to proposed future centerline of Villa Avenue (Indiana Avenue). When my partner Joseph Hassell spoke to Mr. Parry regarding this information, Mr. Parry suggested an option was to redesign Villa Avenue to meet in a cross type intersection with Baldwin Avenuel This would obviously constitute a nearly complete redesign of the Approved Preliminary Plat of Record, and force the project back to square one. Joe also asked Mr. Parry to release the completed plan checking comments from your office, and the County Surveyor's Office. Mr. Parry refused. Joe offered to write a letter to Mr. Parry stating that we understand that the comments are Preliminary in nature and subject to change, so that we could go forward with non related comments to the Traffic Analysis. Again Mr. Parry refused. Subsequent to this Joe and I had a telephone conversation with John Pederson, the Senior Planner, and told him some of the above circumstances, it was apparent from that conversation that John wanted to see the project go forward, and said he would speak to Mr. Parry or his supervisor to help the situation. We did not disclose all the problems we are encountering to John Pederson, because we did not want to embarrass, or create a problem for Mr. Parry. Subsequent to the conversation with John Pederson, Joe Hassell had a very nice telephone conversation with Mr. Bob Brueggeman, the County Traffic Engineer. It was actually at this time that we learned that Mr. Parry had not forwarded the traffic analysis to Bob Brueggeman until last Friday, June 24, over two months after we submitted it. Subsequent to that telephone conversation Joe Hassell again telephoned Mr. Parry, who indicated he had spoken to Mr. Pederson, but not to Mr. Brueggeman and that there was no change in the status of the project, as far as he was concerned. June 29, 1994 Mr. Bill Hemmings Page 4 This was the final attempt to reason with Mr. Parry. This letter has already taken up much of your time, and I apologize for that, but I must formally request that we be assigned a different plan checker for this, and future projects. I must also formally request the release of the plan checking comments from your department, and the County Surveyor's office. I must also request permission to proceed with the construction of the Sanitary Sewer and. subsequently the Domestic Water for the Riverway Villa First Addition. The time extension for this project expires on September 1st, which is just around the corner, and the time delays being experienced by these incidents may already have made it impossible to make this deadline. Please understand, we harbor no ill feelings about Mr. Parry's actions, however the project needs to proceed. Again I apologize for being forced into this situation which now will demand your time and effort. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Please feel free to call me if you have a question regarding any of the above. Best Regards, 1 r wpm) v J q Michael A. Hunt Principal cc: John Pederson - Spokane County Planning Dept. Bob Brueggeman - Spokane County Traffic Engineer Wally Hubbard - Spokane County Planning Dept. Gene Martin - Welco Inc. Ed Dean - Dean Homes gen4004x.ltr OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER • Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer June 15, 1994 Michael Hunt North Idaho Engineering 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverway Villa P.U.D. 2nd Review Gentlemen: A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director A review of the road and drainage plans for this project has been accomplished. Due to the requirements for a completed Traffic Impact Analysis for this project, we are holding the comments for both the Plat map and the Road Plans until the Traffic Impact Analysis is approved and accepted by the agencies having jurisdiction; "completion" includes acceptance and approval. If you have any questions about this review, please contact us at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P. E. Spokane County Engineer Edward P. PatfjhlJr., P.E. Plans Review Engineer cc:,,Koject file reviewer (comments only) 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3473 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 'OP.TH IDAHO ENGINEERING 209'" "13507 North Idaho Engineering, Inc. 4200 Seltire. Way, Suite 2 • Cocul d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667.1171 • Fax (208) 664-350 P.01 4 . 2# 4# #1 #12; # # ##l33! #1833 331 313 iii3#i #2i #iill ##412# FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL # #4111132111322122l 112S1SZTX4Tiiii# 22## ##!l #ti!! # #! #!!!l! #ltii!! PAGE: (1) OF // Z DAIL SENT: ih7� /S J.N. �✓O COMPANY: 6an! eye 190E6asv £111 . ATTN• E Awl? fmx (' q) 324' 3L/ 7g REF: P_huVrwaJJ4 ( x): ( 3 URGENT [ ) REVIEW AND RESPOND [ J NORMAL /TODAY Efr`ER YOUR REQUEST [ 3 APPROVAL [ 3 CONFIDENTIAL [ 3 INFORMATION ( 3 OTHER: REOARDINOa Sae ke r PM? c• Jylikti l . ,49, /irl ✓+ SENT BY James 1 a • t' %,l <f MESSAGE: .4C 1/1f51/fe1Rdion i,, deli/ P) b ✓iaY s NUIt: IF TRANSMISSION IS UNCLEAR, OR INCOMPLETE PLEASE CALL THE ABOVE LISTED TELEPHONE NUMBER AND INFORM SENDER. N CD P- G N M 0. 15 SW 2 15 Z :W 3D . :G 2 F SECTION LINE BARKER ROAD (SYM) EXISTING PAVEMEN 1' 120' —} 30' 12' TRAPPIG 45' FROM SECTION LINE 12' TRAFFIC NOTE, CONSTRUCTION BASED ALONE' SECTIONLINE 0+00 TO 23.3563, FROM EXISTING C 23 +3563 TO 35+63 LANE WIDTH TRANSITION TO EXISTING FROM ST& 23 +35b3 TO 31.00.00 EXISTING 4' BIKE LAME 2' A' R%W 10,1 MN SOE UTURE ACC BOUNDARY TYPE B" T/C - 130' MIN. SWALE PEPTN = T/G - 230' ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT GL' A' 4' (MIN) 6-I/2' CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE FUTURE AGOUI SITION 25 OR SLOPE GATGH POINT WN1GHE ER IS GREATER DRAINAGE, SIDEWALK, SLOPE, 1 UTILITY EASEMENT 20A TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE -5' ' I3ARKER ROAD 16' 6' 3' SIDEWALK 2% MIN. T / G + 02' LOCATE DRThELLS AS SHOI.O t ON PLAN MISSION AVENUE TO SPOKANE RIVER TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION GRATE ELEVATION = fL • 05' EXIST1N6 GRADE 5,1 TO 0.0. Post -$" brand tax transmittal memo 7671 I a of Papa • / '° Jn s►es Nowerf "`""r a c. Oise"; oo.N. TO Ev5 ca vA he Ate <L. Do r. P Plgne or S 28 , 2 V6 2-- Fu, 6/,/_ 35 Fax or PUG-11-'94 THU 14:1: ID ".LLE'Y FIFE Spokane County Planning 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, Wa. 99260 TEL N0:505 927 22 27 SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 EAT 1C319 SPRAGUE AVE • SPOKANE. WA 99206 • (509) 928 -1700 • FAX (509) 9224227 Rod Tedrow Creel July 21, 1994 Attn: Tom Veljic Re: Final PE- 1414 -81, Riverway Villa 1st Addition The Spokane Valley Fire Department will require a water plan showing fire hydrants. We also will require temporary fire apparatus turnarounds at the South end of Clark Fork St. and Colorado River St. These are dead end streets over 150 ft. Kevin Miller Inspector 1:007 P01 �t;%� Spokane County Engineering 1026 W. Broadway Ave Spokane, WA 99260 4 'n Attn.: Ed Parry q RE: Rivenvay Villa Dear Mr. Parry, James Morris from North Idaho Engineering (NIE) requested that I contact your office regarding Rivenvay Villa. I am in the process of finalizing the design for the first phase of 37 lots. NIE requested that WWP install facilities for an additional 4 lots at the south end of Harmony. I understand that improvements to Barker Road will be done at a later time. WWP will have extensive work to move a main overhead feeder trunk line along this route. Please feel free to call me at 482 -4270 if you have any questions. Sincerely, VP—a \0 Frank Ivleland Construction Coordinator cc: James Morris RECEIVED OCT 2 6 1994 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Washington Water Power October 26, 1994 The Washington Water Power Company P.O. Box 3727 Spokane, Washington 99220 (509) 489 -0500 / 1- 800 - 727 -9170 SERVING EASTERN WASHINGTON AND NORTHERN IDAHO WITH ELECTRICITY AND NATURAL GAS Spokane County Planning 1026 W. Broadway Spokane,:Wa. 99260 Attn: Ed Parry PC /bd SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 10319 EAST SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE. WA 99206 • (509) 928 -1700 • FAX (509) 927 -2227 Re: Riverway Villa First Addition PE- 1414 -81 Per our conversation on 10/25/94, the road access is accepted as drawn for the First Addition. RECEIVED OCT 2 81994 SPOKANE COUNTY pt. *a N=NG. DEPARTMENT Karl Boltl Fire Chief October 26, 1994 Sincerely, 0 Do kLast, Paul Chase Chief, Fire Prevention August 4, 1994 MEMORANDUM TO: /File FROM: Ed Parry"? SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverway Villa P.U.D. Barker Rd., Mission Ave. Improvements & Phasing 1. I met with North Idaho Engineering (Michael Hunt) today to discuss what intersection & road improvements needed to be constructed along Barker Road and Mission Avenue as part of this project, and the phasing for these improvements. 2. The following understanding was reached, based on the revised phasing plans: a. Barker Road Phase I: Construct Barker /Indiana intersection (Barker Road to be a 5 -lane section per the County's Special section for Barker Road). Provide acceleration /deceleration lanes (sized per WSDOT Design manual), as well as inbound and outbound tapers Phase II: Construct Barker Road north to the Spokane River, and south to Mission Avenue, unless built out sooner as part of Phase VI. Phase III: No construction on Barker Road needed Phase IV: No construction on Barker Road needed Phase V: No construction on Barker Road needed Phase VI: Construct Barker Road north to the Spokane River, and south to Mission Avenue, unless built out sooner as part of Phase II. N.B.: Conditions of Approval require that Barker and Mission Road improvements adjacent to Phase VI are to be completed prior to issuance of a building permit for any projects on that parcel b. Mission Avenue: Phase I: Construct Mission /Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) intersection. Construct north side of Mission Avenue (per the County's Special Section for Mission Avenue) from Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) to Barker. Provide inbound taper to Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) intersection. August 4, 1994 P1414 Barker Road, Mission Avenue Improvements /Phasing Page 2 of 2 Phase II: No construction on Mission Avenue needed Phase III: Construct Mission /Potomac and Mission /Yukon intersections. Construct north side of Mission Ave (per the County's Special Section for Mission Avenue) along the Mission Ave. frontage from the easterly plat boundary to Mission /Clark Fork (Harmony Lane). Provide inbound taper to the widened Mission /Yukon intersection from east of the easterly plat boundary Phase IV: No construction on Mission Avenue needed Phase V: No construction on Mission Avenue needed Post -It" brand transmittai memo 76111 a o/ a un . / n/e� ` JROre5 ORerf �I "es Ucl c Caddo r A . A t - LP E 05 ca ✓ A 4/ 4 ,e c Ow aheno a f 28' 2 r/G Y wa Wel 3'O7 �. :a ' - 'RTH IDAHO ENGINEERING 20P P.02 • V RUG- 11 -'94 THU 14:13 ID: _EY FIRE TEL NO:509 927 7 52007 P01 Spokane County Planning 1026 W. Broadway spokane, Wa. 99260 XM /bd SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 EAST 40319 SPRAGUE AVE • SPOKANE. KA 99206 • (509) 928 -1700 • FAX (509) 927.222 Rod Tedrow CnN1 July 21, 1994 Attn: Tom Veljic Re: Final PE- 1414 -81, Riverway Villa 1st Addition The Spokane Valley Fire Department will require a water plan showing fire hydrants. Wa also will require temporary fire apparatus turnarounds at the South end of Clark Fork St. and Colorado River St. These are dead end streets over 150 ft. Kevin Miller Inspector 251 Aft: 4 liamovr A "Pad aloe fi) taw staff itA c al v se ire Z4 cJclr524'raa:i ' - RTH IDAHO ENGINEERING 20P 643507 • North Idaho Engineering, Inc. 4200 Seldce Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 - 1171 ■ Fax (208) 664 -3507 +***##11############*# # #*11 *11 #*11 **** # *11 ** * * ** * * #t11* * *4 ##1 *## # # * ** FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL ** S***** 12*******#************ 1*** #** * ** #4* * * * ** * * *11# * ** ** * * * * * ** DATE SENT: /0/25 J.N. yDDy PAGE: (1) OF 7 COMPANY t DONant • ATTN: Fr/ lama Parr REF: Q iVerAnik hick LY:Yion (7vrmer5 k 'eraa, WA.) 1X]: 1 3 URGENT C ] REVIEW AND RESPOND 1 ] 1 3 PER YOUR REQUEST 1 3 APPROVAL C] 1 ] INFORMATION 1.--1 . 5,44.03 J REGARDING: Tvn+pnrar) lit? W6 Siengrcoh SENT BY: MESSAGE: James /,ewer 'from Tv r' nap ous)s Spokane %/l¢ Are an Clark 41.M St. Aid liar many 1.44. as J Mmail 15 how a ihrorlA S$$ree+ and ripnrarl torn around. (f )3Zhi-3 NORMAL /TODAY CONFIDENTIAL haPar`/ rettirb, and Colo ratio Ri vet St .C.f 1f Ism • 177c Al2/46,4 AaS NOTE: IF TRANSMISSION IS UNCLEAR, OR INCOMPLETE PLEASE CALL THE ABOVE LISTED TELEPHONE NUMBER AND INFORM SENDER. P.01 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208) 664 -3507 To: Spokane County Date: 10/17/94 Job no. 4004 Attn: Ed Parry From: Ellen Bickerstaff Ref: We are transmitting *Status* The Following Please North Idaho Engineerir , Inc. Engineering Dept. #P1414 Riverway Villa TRANSMITTAL X Herewith Proposed For Information Separate Cover Preliminary X As requested Via Mail ' In Progress Your Files Delivery Revised Your Submittal Personal Pickup Final Checking Fedex As -built Approval UPS For Payment Your Use Other Partial Other Drawings Calculations Report Letter Maps Check $ Plans X See at Right Call immediately Call after review Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Reqd. Review /Comment X No action Reqd. Specific Items: Original Hydrology Study Redline Message: Lv ti 8VE0 OCT 1 7 1994 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Cgt Drum Byy. Dolt E.J.P. A 5_ DaigneS By. 8/94 Caned By. SCALE HORIZONTAL: NONE VERTICAL NONE BARKER ROAD (SW.) r r LEFT TURN LANE 12' TRAFFIC OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER W. 1D25 BROADWAY AVE SPOKANE. WA. 99250 456 -3600 45' 12' TRAFFIC 2S MIN 2 —CSTC PER R -VALUE TESTING BIKE LANE — ACP CL 'A' 4' (min,) ACP CL 'E' TOTAL ACP DEPTH • APPROVED• COUNTY ENGINEER Del= ¥ -9Y 6' SIDEWALK R/W FUTURE ACQUISITION 2 5 TYPE '8' CURB WID14 AS REOUIRED DRAINAGE MD SIDEWALK EASEMENT 208 TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE 4 6' SIDEWALK 2% MIN 2 ' 5- ; T/C + 0.2' 6' MINIMUM WATER DEPTH FOR 208 0.9' MINIMUM DEPTH FOR STORM VOLUME MAXIMUM WATER SURFACE ELEVATION DOES NOT ENCROACH ON FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA BARKER ROAD MISSION AVENUE TO SPOKANE RIVER E.J.P TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION SHEET 1 OF 1 • 1: cIIf kill mo: X SV COl4 Dawn By. Date: E.J.P. 013/94 S CALE HORIZONTAL: NONE O FFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER W. 1025 BROADWAY AVE, - SPOKANE, WA. 99260 -0170 456-.3600 /% APPROVED C � . "- vi EAST EAST I S S TYPICAL I Q N A V E N U OF BARKER ROAD L: h1 fN L f\ �`l D ROADWAY SECTION E SHEET 1 O 1 Designed By E.J.P. OB 94 COUNTY ENGINEER Date: 7, i94�( Checked By: VERTICAL: NONE MISSION AVENUE (SYM.) 0/L 12' TRAFFIC 30' 12' TRAFFIC 2% MIN L ACP CL. "A" ACP CL. "E" CSTC PER R -VALUE TESTING 4' BIKE LANE NEW R/W 2' 4" (min.) TOTAL ACP DEPTH FUTURE ACQUISITION 10' TYPE "B" CURB WIDTH AS REQUIRED DRAINAGE AND SIDEWALK EASEMENT 205 TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE 4'. A 6' 2' SIDEWALKS 2% MIN SLOPE EASETAENT 1WDTH AS NEEDED 5:1 T/C + 02' 6" MINIMUM WATER' DEPTH FOR 206 0.9' MINIMUM DEPTH FOR STORM VOLUME MAXIMUM WATER SURFACE ELEVATION DOES NOT ENCROACH ON FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA EXISTING CROUNO rnnnc FAX COVER SHEET • SPOKANE COUNTY - ENGINEERS 3rd FLOOR FAX # (509) 324 -3478 PHONE # (509) 324 -3478 1026 W. BROADWAY SPOKANE, WA 99260 PHONE # (509) 456 -3600 DATE: 10 August 94 TO: COMPANY: CITY /STATE: Michael Hunt, P.E. / Joe Hassell, P.E. North Idaho Engineering Coeur d' Alene, ID NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): 1 FROM: SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverway Villa Estates Mission Avenue Section FAX # : ZP J6Wa- 3 p (Plans Review, x257) 036 1. Per our 5 Aug 94 meeting, the following section for Mission Avenue should be used. Please be advised that this is a draft which the County Engineer has not yet approved; the County Traffic & Planning Engineer (Gary Kennaly) has approved the section. 2. Please inform James Morris of your office that the cul -de -sac layout should conform to the most recent edition of the Spokane County road standards - the curb return radius should be 30', with a 25' R/W radius, at the shoulder of the cul -de -sac M1540N AVENUE (SYN.) C/L r 12' TRAFFIC 35' 30' 12' TRAFFIC 2X MIN —ACP CL ACP CL —CSTC PER R —VALUE TESTING 4' 1 2' BIKE LANE 4' (min.) TOTAL ACP DEPTH NEW R/W 10' FUTURE ACQUISITION TYPE 'B' CURB lid tool, 3 WIDTH AS REQUIRED DRAINAGE AND SIDEWALK EASEMENT 208 TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE 4: 6' SIDEWALK 2X MIN z 6UTE FA4LDIT AS N2666 T/C + 0.2' 6' MINIMUM WATER DEPTH FOR 208 0.9' MINIMUM DEPTH FOR STORM VOLUME MAXIMUM WATER SURFACE ELEVATION DOES NOT ENCROACH ON FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA Drown By Dale: F,I p, B/94 Despned By. F.J.P. _ J8t Checked By. SCALE HORIZONTAL NONE VERTICAL NONE OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY GINEER W. 1026 BROADW AVE. SPOKANE, W 99260 456- APPROVED' COUNTY ENONEER Dols MISSION AVENUE EAST OF BARKER ROAD TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION SHEET 1 OF 1 MISSION AVENUE (SYM.) CA 12' TRAFFC 35' 30' 12' TRAFFIC 2X MIN ACP CL 'A" ACP CL "E' CSTC PER R —VALUE TESTING 4' I 2' BIKE LANE NEW 10' FUTURE ACQUISITION TYPE 'B" CURB WIDTH AS REQUIRED DRAINAGE AND SIDEWALK EASEMENT 208 TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE 4: 6 SIDEWALK 2% MIN 2 ' •1 C (min.) T/C + 0.2' TOTAL ACP DEPTH SLOPE EA$]RNT •lath AS 6' MINIMUM WATER DEPTH FOR 208 0.9' MINIMUM DEPTH FOR STORM VOLUME MAXIMUM WATER SURFACE ELEVATION DOES NOT ENCROACH ON FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA Drown By Dole: F J P. 8/94 Designed By 8/94 Chadian By. SCALE HORIZONTAL• NONE VERTICAL NONE OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER W. 1026 BROADWAY AVE. SPOKANE. WA. 99260 455-3500 APPROVED; CDUX TY ENON Dolt MISSION AVENUE EAST OF BARKER ROAD p TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION SHEET 1 OF 1 io -9y Plitt Post - It" brand tax transmittal memo 7671 . of apn • / .JrorleS /NWL?!f Fnwr 024C 0/5000 D° N. 1.747 Eiv5 `o. 4/A 1 /a/ AR<- Dopi. Phone it ! . 2 vG Y Z8 Fax o 1264 3c07 F.x v AUG- 11 -'94 THU 14:13 IP:'- KLLE'f FIRE TEL NO:509 '227 Spokane County Planning 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, Wa. 99260 Attn: Tom Veljic Re: Final PE- 1414 -81, Riverway Villa 1st Addition The Spokane Valley Fire Department will require a water plan showing fire hydrants. We also will require temporary fire apparatus turnarounds at the South end of Clark Fork St. and Colorado River St. These are dead end streets over 150 ft. KM /bd SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT Spokane County Flre Protection District No. 1 EAST 10310 SPRAGUE AVE • SPOKANE. WA 99206 • (509) 928 -t700 • FM (509) 92T2227 Rod Tedrow Ctdot July 21, 1994 Kevin Miller Inspector 14007 P0 � 1 / i/ REcEIVECO AUG 3 1 1994 L !Ot of cuuNri ENGINEER r Nort*idaho Engineering, Inc. 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208) 664 -3507 August 31, 1994 J.N. 4004 Spokane County Engineering Department W. 1026 Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 ATTN: Mr. Edward J. Parry, Jr., P.E. RE: Riverway Villa Dear Mr. Parry: With this letter we are submitting revised copies of the Riverway Villa First Addition Street and Storm Drainage plans, and a revised copy of the Hydrology Study for Riverway Villa Subdivision First Phase. These plans have been revised per the comments from your 2n review dated July 26, 1994. With the revised plans, we are submitting a copy of the landscape plan, "R" value tests, a copy of the Water Plans approved by Consolidated Irrigation District, a copy of the Sewer Plans approved by the Spokane County Utilities Department, and a letter from the fire district requesting a temporary cul -de -sac at the temporary terminus of Clark Fork St. and Colorado River St.(renamed to Harmony Lane and McMillan Lane per review comments). Please note that the Water and Sewer Plans were approved prior to the latest plan -check comments and that revisions to these approved plans may be in the form of "As- Built" drawings. A copy of the revised plans highlighted in color is also enclosed in this submittal. Because of the extensive revisions created by the review comments several of the pages of this highlighted set of plans would literally be covered in color. In place of painting these sheets I am including a summary of changes that took place on these sheets. SHEET 2: Indiana Avenue (formerly Villa Avenue) 1. Landscaped Tracts (13') to be owned by the homeowners association have been added to both sides of Indiana Avenue. \94 \4004J.LET 2. Centerline radius is increased to 715' to meet County requirements. This change affected the centerline stationing of Indiana Avenue and stationing has been revised. 3. Sidewalks have been added to both sides. 4. Sidewalk, drainage, utility and slope easements have been added to both sides. 5. Vertical profile has changed to eliminate grade breaks. 6. Curb elevations have been recalculated. August 31, 1994 Edward Parry Page 2 SHEET 3: Harmony Lane (formerly Clark Fork Street) 1. Centerline radius changed to 410' per County requirements. This change affected the centerline stationing. Stationing has been recalculated for Harmony Lane. SHEET 4: Baldwin Lane (formerly Klamath River Street) 1. Centerline radius changes on Harmony Lane have caused a change in the centerline stationing of Baldwin Lane. \94 \4004J.LET 7. Notes have been changed to reflect comments received in the review comments. 8. Intersections have been revised. 9. Slope cut /fill limits shown out side of right -of -way. 2. Sidewalks relocated to 10' easement area to accommodate GIA area. 3. Vertical Profile has changed to eliminate grade breaks. 4. Sidewalk, drainage, utility, and slope easements have been added to both sides. 5. Intersection radius elevations have been calculated. 6. Intersections have been revised. 7. Notes have been changed to reflect comments received in the review comments. 8. Slope cut /fill limits shown out side of right -of -way. 9. Harmony has been extended to provide the second access for the Riverway Villa First Addition. 2. Sidewalks relocated to 10' easement area to accommodate GIA area. 3. Vertical Profile has changed to eliminate grade breaks. 4. Sidewalk, drainage, utility, and slope easements have been added to both sides. 5. Intersection radius elevations have been calculated. 6. Intersections have been revised. August 31, 1994 Edward Parry Page 3 SHEET 5: McMillan Lane (formerly Colorado River Street) 1. Centerline radius changed to 410' per County requirements on a portion of the road to be developed in Phase 3 has affected the centerline stationing. Stationing has been recalculated for McMillan Lane. \94 \4004J.LET 7. Notes have been changed to reflect comments received in the review comments. 8. Slope cut /fill limits shown out side of right -of -way. Augusta Lane (formerly Allegheny Avenue) 1. Sidewalks relocated to 10' easement area to accommodate GIA area. 2. Vertical Profile has changed to eliminate grade breaks. 3. Sidewalk, drainage, utility, and slope easements have been added to both sides. 4. Intersection radius elevations have been calculated. 5. Intersection have been revised. 6. Notes have been changed to reflect comments received in the review comments. 7. Slope cut /fill limits shown out side of right -of -way. 2. Sidewalks relocated to 10' easement area to accommodate GIA area. 3. Vertical Profile has changed to eliminate grade breaks. 4. Sidewalk, drainage, utility, and slope easements have been added to both sides. 5. Intersection radius elevations have been calculated. 6. Intersections have been revised. 7. Notes have been changed to reflect comments received in the review comments. 8. Slope cut /fill limits shown out side of right -of -way. 9. A temporary cul -de -sack has been added per letter from Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 dated July 21, 1994. August 31, 1994 Edward Parry Page 4 SHEETS 6, 7, & 8: Barker Road & Mission Avenue. 2. Barker Road has been designed for the portion north of the intersection with Mission Avenue and south of the bridge over the Spokane River. Portions to be improved with a later phase of the Riverway Villa project have been shaded. 3. Mission Avenue (on sheet 8) is designed from the intersection with Barker Road to the new intersection with Harmony Lane. The remainder of Mission Avenue is to be designed with Phase 3 of Riverway Villa. Please accept this submittal for the final review of Riverway Villa First Addition, and let us know if we can help your review process in any way. Very Truly Yours, North Idaho Engineering, Inc. JAMES 0. MORRIS JOM:slf \e4 \4004.7.r.ET 1. This is the first time improvement drawings have been submitted for Barker Road and Mission Avenue. I .4,�r U , C O IN - 1 - Y S P O K .4 NJ 1E ;siy Y+�,�';E,n�!I?�,. n July 6, 1994 OFFICE OF Ti COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Michael Hunt North Idaho Engineering 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverway Villa P.U.D. NW letter dated 29 Jun 94 Gentlemen: "3. As per the original conditions of approval: A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director 1 have reviewed your letter of 29 Jun 94. 1 am providing this response to your allegations in order to set the record straight. 1. Traffic Impact Analysis: a. The Conditions of Approval from the Division of Engineering and Roads from the most recent time extension reads (please refer also to attachment 1): "1. All previously imposed conditions are still applicable. "2. The County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a Principle (sic) Arterial and Mission Avenue as a Minor Arterial. The existing right -of -way widths are not consistent with those specified in the Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan, in addition to the required right -of -way dedication, a strip of property 5 feet in width along Barker Road and 10 feet in width along Mission Avenue shall be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when improvements are made to Barker Road and Mission Avenue. "A traffic analysis will be required of the developer and reviewed by Spokane County prior to plat finalization. This analysis will be coordinated with the Washington State Department of Transportation. A traffic analysis for each phase will serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Should the analysis determine a need for intersection upgrading, the developer will be assessed a proportionate share for the required improvements. 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 P1414 - Riverway Villa P.U.D. Re: NIE letter dtd 29 Jun 94 Page 2 of 7 "4. Prior to any plat checking of Riverway Villa for phased finalization of the plat the aforementioned analysis shall be completed." (emphasis ours) It is quite clear that the Conditions of Approval require the Traffic Impact Analysis to be coordinated with WSDOT; further reading of the original conditions indicates that WSDOT will have the final say as to the adequacy of the analysis and any required mitigation on the part of the developer. The coordination of any work submitted to multiple reviewing agencies is traditionally (and rightly so) the responsibility of the developer, or the developer's agent. The role of the reviewing agencies is to ensure that other interested agencies have reviewed the appropriate portions of a project proposal prior to approval of a project, or prior to any other defined milestone activities related to project approval. It is not the responsibility of any reviewing agency to ensure the physical delivery of any portion of a proposed project's documents to any other reviewing agency, nor are reviewing agencies generally staffed to ensure this aspect of the coordination. As you have been informed by Mr. Parry of our office, the term "completed" means that the submitted work meets the requirements of the agencies having jurisdiction, and that no further revisions to the submitted work are necessary; "completed" does not mean that the required work has been merely submitted to the reviewing agency (or agencies). If that were the case, then any submittal to our office could be considered "complete ". b. The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not received with the 1st plan submittal for this project on 11 May 1993. You were notified in our review comments dated 26 Aug 1993 that the T1A must be submitted and approved "prior to any further plan review." (please refer to attachment 2). c. The most recent submittal of plans for this project was received in our office on 19 Apr 1994, nearly eight months after the previous review comments were returned to you (please refer to attachment 3). The TIA included in this submittal was bundled up with the rest of the road /drainage plans and drainage report; no special indication to deliver the TIA to any other department was indicated, or requested on the transmittal form. There was no contact for your office to ensure that we had even received the TIA, much Tess to inquire as to its review status. P1414 - Riverway Villa P.U.D. Re: NIE letter dtd 29 Jun 94 Page 3 of 7 d. Mr. Parry started his review of the most recent submittal for this project on 24 May 94. It was at that time that we discovered that the ownership of this project had changed, rendering the fee agreement invalid. At this time Mr. Parry informed your Mr. Joe Hassell that a fee agreement from the current owner would be needed, and the appropriate forms were mailed (as requested by Mr. Hassell) to your office. The fee agreement from the current owner was received at the County on 6 Jun 94. e. Even though the fee agreement from the previous owner was invalid, the County maintained your project at its place in the system for review sequence, based on its 19 Apr 94 receipt date; other projects requiring new or revised fee agreements are typically assigned a place in the review sequence based on the date of receipt of the new /revised fee agreement. In spite of the intense workload in our office, Mr. Parry was able to start the review of this most recent submittal on 8 Jun 94, and completed his review on 15 Jun 94. This review revealed that the vast majority of the previous comments on the plans (nearly two - thirds) were inadequately addressed, if addressed at all. In addition, the eight pages of new comments (based on the revised plans) indicates that the current submittal is woefully out of compliance with the current County Road Standards and Guidelines for Stormwater Management. It is quite clear that we have gone above and beyond a reasonable effort to demonstrate our good faith in keeping this project moving. We would be well within our rights to have not even yet reviewed the 1st submittal of the plans for this project until the TIA is completed; yet we have (1) conducted a cursory review of the 1st submittal, and provided comments; and (2) conducted a second review, and have prepared comments so they may be issued, pending other comments related to the TIA, virtually upon the completion of the TIA. f. You yourself stated to Mr. Parry, in your meeting of the morning of 23 Jun 94, that "the TIA was sent to WSDOT on 18 Apr 94 ", or words to that effect. You also made this same statement to Mr. Pat Harper of our office later that same morning. Upon your departure from our office, Mr. Harper called Mr. Greg Figg of WSDOT to determine the status of their review; Mr. Figg informed Mr. Harper that the TIA had not yet been received by WSDOT. We contacted Mr. Figg on 5 July 94; he informs us that the TIA was not received by WSDOT until sometime during the week of 27 June 94. P1414 - Riverway Villa P.U.D. Re: NIE letter dtd 29 Jun 94 Page 4 of 7 From the timeline and actions by you and your office to date on this project, it appears to me that any responsibility for delays due to the review of the TIA lies squarely with you. Our project file indicates that your firm has failed to: (1) kept the fee agreement current on this project; (2) performed the coordination of the TIA in a responsible fashion; (3) responded to the review comments in a timely fashion. 2. Sanitary Sewer Permit: Our Permit Technician received a request on the morning of 23 Jun 94 to issue a sewer construction permit for this project. I reviewed the status of the project plans and TIA with Mr. Parry. On the basis of the incomplete plans and uncompleted TIA, this request for a permit was denied. The approval of any underground utility plans by the County Utilities Department is contingent upon approval of the road and drainage plans, as Mr. Parry explained to Mr. Hassell. Given that there are significant unresolved issues related to the road alignment (e.g., the access location on Barker Road, and significantly substandard horizontal curves on Indiana (indicated as Villa Avenue) and Clark Fork Street), the County would be foolish to allow the construction of the sewers at this point in time. As was explained to Mr. Hassell, the County's experience has been that a contractor or developer applying for a sewer construction permit will make great promises that any problems with utility locations relative to the road alignment will be fixed; if only the County would issue a sewer construction permit in advance (usually considerably in advance) of the road plan approval; when a conflict develops, the contractor or developer experiences an amazing loss of memory and refuses to fix the problem. As a result, according to the County's acting Utility Director, the County winds up with not only a substandard, non - compliant installation, but also the concomitant long -term maintenance and operation problems. Based on the current status of the road and drainage plans, and the TIA approval, I can see no sensible reason to allow any construction permits on this site at this point in time. P1414 - Riverway Villa P.U.D. Re: NIE letter dtd 29 Jun 94 Page 5 of 7 3. Indiana Avenue intersection location: a. The preliminary plat is merely that - preliminary. It is developed to show on a conceptual level that some configuration of a proposed project will meet the underlying zoning and land -use requirements; approval of this concept does not constitute establishment or approval, in any way, shape, or form, of the preliminary layout as the final configuration from which no peregrinations may be made, nor is it intended to. The Preliminary Plat approval is contingent upon demonstration of compliance with the Standards in effect at the time of submittal for Final Plat approval. b. The intersection separation distances noted in the current edition of the County Road Standards (effective 1981) were established to provide for the safety of the general public, based on nationally- recognized engineering standards. c. Your office was informed of this deficiency in our review comments of 26 Aug 1993. No contact was made with our office on this issue until the last week of June 1994, nearly ten months after we returned the previous review comments to you. d. Mr. Parry has informed Mr. Hassell that several options exist to resolve the intersection separation issue: (1) move the Indiana /Barker intersection to the north to Provide adequate separation; (2) move the intersection to the south to align with the intersection of Baldwin to the west of Barker; or (3) if the proposed access point does not meet the requirements of the County Road Standards, then a Design Deviation Request, with justification for the deviation, is to submitted to the County. e. Mr. Parry suggested that Mr. Hassell initiate coordination on this matter with Mr. Bob Breuggeman, the County Traffic Engineer, in order to ascertain whether submittal of a Design Deviation might be productive to your design effort. Mr. Parry also indicated to Mr. Hassell that the appropriate forms would be left for NIE at our pick -up counter. Mr. Hassell left Mr. Parry with the impression that NIE would pick up these forms. Until a Design Deviation request is submitted and approved by the County Engineer, the requirements of the County Road Standards govern. To date, we have not received a Design Deviation request for the Indiana /Barker intersection location. P1414 - Riverway Villa P.U.D. Re: NTE letter dtd 29 Jun 94 Page 6 of 7 In short, the developer is responsible for demonstrating compliance to the appropriate standards prior to Final Plat approval, regardless of any conceptual configuration indicated on the Preliminary Plat documents. If there is some overriding constraint which precludes compliance with the standards, a mechanism exists to allow the County to accept particular non - compliant situations. In summary, our department in general, and Mr. Parry in particular, has been more than reasonable in dealing with you and your company on this project. In response to the actions requested on the last page of your letter: 1. No other plan reviewer will be assigned to this project; Mr. Parry will remain assigned to this project. 2. Plan review comments, and plat review comments will not be released until such time as the Traffic Impact Analysis is completed; that is, until all reviewing agencies are satisfied that the TIA adequately addresses this project's impact on the surrounding road network, and any required mitigating measures have been determined for incorporation into the plans for this project. 3. No permits for any construction on this site will be issued until the Road and Drainage Plans appear to be nearly ready for approval. P1414 - Riverway Villa P.U.D. Re: NIE letter dtd 29 Jun 94 Page 7 of 7 Finally, it is our position that any alleged delays on this project are the direct result of actions and /or omissions by you and your firm, and the responsibility for these alleged delays lies solely within the purview of the Developer and /or your office. If you have any other questions in these matters, please contact us at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, William H. Hemmings, P. E. Development Services Administrator cc: project file Vfeviewer Spokane County Public Works Director - Dennis Scott, P.E. Spokane County Engineer - Ron Homiann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer's Office - Gary Remaly, P.E. Bob Breuggeman, P.E. Spokane County Planning Department - Wally Hubbard Jon Peterson Spokane County Prosecutor's Office - Mike Dempsey Developer: Stanton Spokane Limited Partnership, ATTN: Edward Dean, 16720 NE 116th, Redmond WA 98052 a ATTACHMENT 1 Extension of Time Findings • eC(av M&M ?4 q*ti e 3 aP PE- 1414 -R1 Page 2 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS (UPDATED) Prior To Issuance Of A Building Permit Or Ilse Of The Property As Proposed: 1. All previously imposed conditions are still applicable. 2. The County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a Principle Arterial and Mission Avenue as a Minor Arterial. The existing right -of -way widths are not consistent with those specified in the Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan, in addition to the required right -of -way dedication, a strip of property 5 feet in width along Barker Road and 10 feet in width along Mission Avenue shall be set aside in reserve. This. property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when arterial improvements are made to Barker Road and Mission Avenue. 3. As per the original conditions of approval: " A traffic analysis of each phase will be required of the developer and reviewed by Spokane County prior to plat finalization. This analysis will be coordinated with the State of Washington Department of Transportatioti. A traffic analysis for each phase will serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Should the analysis determine a need for intersection upgrading, the developer will be assessed a proportionate share for the required improvements. 4. Prior to any plat checking of Riverway Villa for phased finalization of the plat the aforementioned analysis shall be completed. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES (UPDATED) 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on- site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94." 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 4. The dedication shall state: "Each new dwelling unit shall be double - plumbed for connection to future areawide collection systems." 5. A dry sewer connection to the future areawide sewerage system shall be constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer connection shall be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. 6. Applicant shall make connection to public sewer system. Sewer connection permit is required. Plans and specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. 7. The 37 lots proposed for Riverway Villa First Addition is authorized for the use of on site disposal systems.and shall provide double plumbing and a dry sewer. Any future phases of Riverway Villa shall connect to an interim public system or connect to a permanent public sewer facility. Riverway Villa First Addition shall connect to the interim facility or public sewer when available. ATTACHMENT 2 Gentlemen: OFFICE OF THE COUNT' ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Michael Hunt North Idaho Engineering 4200 Seltice Way. Suite 2 Coeur d'Alene. ID 83814 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverway Villa P.U.D. 1st Review Due to the requirements for a completed Traffic Impact Analysis for this project, a cursory review of the road and drainage plans for this project has been accomplished. Areas of concern to us are noted on the attached review comments. Please make the corrections and resubmit them to this office in order that the review process may proceed. When the plans are resubmitted mark all changes on the revised print in color. In addition, please provide an information copy of any utility plans for this project. If you have any questions about this review, please contact us. at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P. E. Spokane County Engineer encls: Plans (I set) Calculations (1 copy) Comments (3 pages) cc: project file - viewer (comments only) W. 1026 Broadway Ave. A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORTS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director August 26 1993 Edward axjy.' Jr., P.E. Plans Review Engineer Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 FAX (509) 456 -4715 REVIEW #: PROJECT #: P1414 DATE: 26 August 93 PROJECT NAME: Riverwav Villa P.U.D. REVIEW COMMENTS SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING & ROADS 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260 -0710 PHONE (509)456 -3600 FAX (509)324 -3478 REVIEWER: Ed Parry PLANS: 1. Each submittal must be stamped, signed and dated by a Washington State- licensed Professional Engineer 2. Developer's approval signature will be needed prior to plan approvals 3. Evidence that the layout has been coordinated with the electric utility serving the site will be needed 4. Title Block: a. Indicate County project # (P1414) b. Indicate street name (not "A ", "B ", etc.) c. Indicate stationing limits of the road shown on the plan 5. Indicate CL bearings on all roads shown on the plan sheet 6. Indicate delta angle, radius, arc length, and tangent length (for centerline) on all horizontal curves 7. Indicate delta angle, radius, arc length, and tangent length (back of curb) on all curb returns 8. Barker Road: a. Indicate existing R/W, new R/W, future setaside b. Provide plans for Barker Road improvements 9. indicate topography within the R /W, and to a sufficient distance beyond the R/W to resolve questions of setback. slope easements, drainage, road continuations, etc. 10. Indicate existing and proposed utilities, or provide an information copy of the utility plans for this project 11. Indicate Block & Lot #'s north of Indiana REVIEW COMMENTS 26 August 93 PROJECT # P1414 REVIEW # 1 • Page 2 of 3 12. Indicate Section, Range, Township on each plan sheet 13. Indicate BCR, MCR, ECR elevations in plan & profile 14. Indicate ECR stations on plan 15. Indicate BCR, ECR stations in profile 16. Label all PC's and PT's on horizontal curves (CL); curbline also if radius is different from CL curve 17. Provide profile elevation scale line at left & right sides of profiles; elevations should match vertical scale indicated on plans 18. Indicate datum 19. Indicate Benchmark 20. Provide intersection sight distance analysis for all intersections with County roads, and for all lots where the horizontal sight triangle encroaches onto private property 21. Provide "R" -value test results to validate pavement section 22. Indicate curb cut CL station. length, invert elevation 23. Indicate Drywell CL station, offset, grate elevation, grate type 24. Provide 30' (min.) separation between drywelis 25. Drywell should be offset from curb cut by 4' min. 26. Curb cut detail: a. Needs back apron b. 2" depression at flowline is required 27. Indiana Street detail: Indicate sidewalks 28. Drywell detail: Needs to comply with SCRS std det. B -I 29. Rural road approach detail: Not applicable since this is an Urban density development. Coordinate with the County Traffic Engineer for required pavement transition lengths in and out of the site REVIEW COMMENTS 26 August 93 PROJECT # P1414 REVIEW # 1 Page 3 of 3 30. Type "B" curb: Coordinate with current SCRS 31. 300' minimum intersection separation is required on arterials (Barker Rd) 32. Traffic impact analysis submittal and approval is required (per Findings and Conditions) prior to any further plan review CALCULATIONS: 1. Each submittal must be stamped, signed and dated by a Washington State - licensed Professional Engineer 2. Basin Map: a. Show offsite topography b. Coordinate Basin Map with project phasing 3. Must use SCS TR -55 (June 86) for basins > 10 acres; must use Bowstring method for basins < 10 acres 4. Include slope calculations for T path 5. All nomographs should be readable; right -hand scale is cut off 6. Provide curb inlet capacity calculations 7. Provide Bowstring calculations: required volume, provided volume 8. Provide 208 calculations: a. Required, provided area b. Required, provided volume RP ATTACHMENT 3 • • 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208) 664 -3507 To: County of Spokane Engineering Dept. Ann: Bill Hemmings Ref: Riverway Villa North Idaho Engineering TRANSMITTAL We are transmitting *Status* X Herewith Proposed For Information Separate Cover Preliminary As requested Via Mail In Progress Your Files Delivery X Revised Your Submittal Personal Pickup X Final Checking Fedex As -built X Approval UPS For Payment Your Use Other Partial Other The Following X Drawings Calculations X Report Letter Maps Check $ Plans X See at Right Please Message: Call immediately Call after review X Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Regd. Review /Comment No action Regd. Date: 4/ 1 8/ 9 4 Job no. 4 0 0 4 From: James 0. Morris Specific Items: Redline Comments 2 - Hydrology Study 2 - Traffic Impact Report 2 - Street & Storm Drainage .Improvement Plans By: Attn: North Idaho Engineering, Inc. 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208) 664 - 3507 To: Spokane County Date: 10/17/94 Engineering Dept. Ed Parry Ref: #P1414 (Riverway Villa) We are transmitting *Status* X Herewith Proposed For Information Separate Cover Preliminary X As requested Via Mail • In Progress Your Files Delivery Revised Your Submittal Personal Pickup Final Checking Fedex As -built Approval UPS For Payment Your Use Other Partial Other The Following Specific Items: Please Drawings Calculations Report Letter Maps Check $ Plans X See at Right Call immediately Call after review Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Regd. Review /Comment X No action Reqd. TRANSMITTAL Original Street & Storm Improvement Plans Redlines Message: From: Michael Hunt Job no. 4004 RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNT' ENGINEER 7t - 2o6 ss3_L 4t iwdirahM v4 !r l 1a 0 Ap:tts 7(6 a 6 i t J lsj 4n t Z,aurl of - / t o 1. '7 It (ky lab 1 ay • _ • WIN 11 111 11•111 1 1 rallra • • I C 97- PEE • f �IWr�ta9�u TV& #ac►' 4 i W. A Icq \Ample MEM 3 40 x \ I YB its � II NkRtie L • . iwto r i l l --T I sc ccwrx 1 1 I r l 1 ScaeUWX -- f C Foe STEAL STAGd ✓nuza M * I WRtLC 3a@FAte_El ital ,.C45 not I etJ4% C4f 0t4 � 4: i (At sn+ m Seer sr 577A 7P ' p Tlt t_41 _ _ _ ( OWI►FILVS . AS QED . .,a T 2°(O C n c Z 0 0 0 o z o e O ^ P F . •• o • c CT 7 00 0 0 0 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208) 664 -3507 To: County of Spokane Engineering Dept. Attn: Bill Hemmings Ref: Riverway Villa The Following X Drawings Calculations X Report Letter Maps Check $ Plans X See at Right Please Call immediately Call after review X Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Reqd. Review /Comment No action Regd. North Idaho Engineering TRANSMITTAL Date: 4/ 1 8/ 9 4 Job no. 4 0 0 4 From: James O. Morris We are transmitting * Status • X Herewith Proposed For Information Separate Cover Preliminary As requested Via Mail In Progress Your Files Delivery X Revised Your Submittal Personal Pickup X Final Checking Fedex As -built X Approval UPS For Payment Your Use Other Partial Other Specific Items: Redline Comments 2 - Hydrology Study 2 - Traffic Impact Report 2 - Street & Storm Drainage Improvement Plans Message: R.ECEPVED APR 1 91994 SPOKP,IiE COUNTY ENGINEER 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208) 664 - 3507 To: County of Spokane N. 811 Jefferson St. Spokane, WA. 99260 -0180 Attn: Mr. Bi 11 Hemmings From: Mi rhael A Hnnt Ref: Riverway Villa project - Barker Road We are transmitting *Status* ** The Following ** Drawings Calculations ** Report Letter Maps Check $ Plans See at Right Herewith Proposed For Information Separate Cover Preliminary As requested Via Mail In Progress Your Files Delivery ** Revised Your Submittal Personal Pickup Final ** Checking Fedex As -built Approval UPS For Payment Your Use Other Partial Other ** ** North Idaho Engineering, Inc. TRANSMITTAL Please Message: Call immediately Call after review Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Regd. Review /Comment No action Reqd. Date: May 7, 1993 Job no. 3001 Specific Items: Improvement P1 ails Hydrology Study RECEIVED MAY 1 1 1991 COUNTY ENGINEER 1 (o O Q Itio lass \ \COO G\-=<. Ca Nom. T E, 44 S5 "ea EA 808 3R 0 GGEMt7/0 SRo/64.uI Co X uSR? (DL F 1 42 4,4 4 1:-uS601 r ' --- (Af ) lo gig 1 . - X51 N-`21 z S,.J\/ 9 a A . A. . 3 7 3 C? op -c-. . - . — — T - tu. 23 " ».c9t,-Q Li ,-vdt - _ nM i1u E ✓J _ 2 or, Q_� A$.Q — s - - ri 1 s ! ASS-14 )-0-4F2-9 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO: Division of Engineering and Roads Division of Utilities Department of Buildings Spokane County Health District Spokane County Parks Fire Protection District No. 1 Central Valley School District Consolidated Irrigation District FROM: Thomas Veljc, Planner 11 Thank you. S P 0 1< A N G -' .'7i11 -, i.11i ?'t! k C 0 Ll MEMORANDUM WALLIS 1). HUBHARD, DI RI;CIOR RECEIVED APR 1 4 1994 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER DATE: April 14, 1994 SUBJECT: Review of Final Plat PE 1414 - 81 RIVERWAY VILLA 1ST ADDITION Enclosed find copies of the above referenced final plat. Please review and forward any comments by April 28, 1994. If you have any questions you may contact Thomas Veljic at 456 -2205. sam Enclosure c: North Idaho Engineering, 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2, Coeur D'Alene, ID 83814 WEST1026 BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, OASIIINC[1ON 99260 -0240 • (509) 456-2205 Plat Number: Number of Lots: Sponsor: 1414 '178 Trinity Enterprises,'Inc. n._ 2128 PinesRRd. Suite 17 -9 Address: - Spokane, WA. 99206 City, State, Zip: • Phone No: 928-9645;,: 1(800) 6372034 Engineer /Surveyor: Northlldaho Engineering, Inc. 'Address.: W. 4200 Seltice Way City, State, Zip: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 Phone No: Number of acres renainiix3: ■ PRELIMINARY PLAT F,XTENSICN OF TIME FORM *A * * * * * * * *** (208)667 -1171 Number of lets originally approved: Number of phases finalized to date: PHASED PROJECT (TO BE CCP:PLI;I'ED OILY, IP TILE PLAT IS .BEING DEVELOPED AND FINALIZED IN PHASES) 178 0. Number of lots remaining to 'be finalized: 50.2 * * * * * * * * * * ** ='to develope the first phase during 199 Plat Naive: Number of Acres: Address: Phone No:, 178 50.2 276 -2048 Riverway Villa ,' Property Mner: John D. 'Clardy - P.O. Box 762 Deer Park, WA. 99006 City,; State, Zip: 1 , PLEASE PI37VIDE US WII11,.'I]LE FOLLWINGII•IIORIATION Briefly summarize the.'pwgress made, to date, in ,preparing the plat to be :finalized (i.e., physical construction, bonding for improvements, surveying and, drafting work, accomplishing various departmental requirements, obtaining •or.,granting easerrents,;'etc.) '.TheiEngineer has completed the Boundary survey, the calculation map . for the entire 178•ldts. The final plat map and construction drawings •for the first phase (37 lots) have been started, and will be submitted. to the varioys public agencies, as required, prior to February 1, 1993. . It is the intention of the project proponent restrictions be waived in eicchan g a fo I: I.: in the futuni _II I 1 sewer mainteo,the ea, however this � 1 1111 watt Mi'chae A. Hunt North Idaho Engineering, Inc.. SPOKANE COUNTY COURT NOUSE TO: Spokane County Engineer Spokane County Utilities Spokane County Health District Spokane County Department of Buildings Spokane County Parks Department Fire Protection District No. 1 Consolidated Irrigation District Central Valley School District FROM: Tim Lawhead, Planner II er-, DATE: January 19, 1993 SUBJECT: Extension of Time for PE- 1414 -81 RIVERWAY VILLA The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached request for an Extension of Time to finalize the plat of PE- 1414 -81 Riverway Villa. If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should be made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to us by February 2, 1993. If you have any questions please contact me at 456 -2205. Please direct any written response to Tim Lawhead. Thank you for your prompt attention. c: Trinity Enterprises, 2128 North Pines Road, Suite 17 -9, Spokane, WA 99206 John Clardy, P O Box 762, Deer Park, WA 99006 North Idaho Engineering, 4200 West Seltice Way, Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 Enclosure r cao4iTiVAI 'AE: ( ��C{�!➢a�(: .�A711 1\7 R E t- `2 -- *. to — PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAN 0 1923DWAY F ENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 4 56 - 2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 vemitE CG'J1 TY ET'+GINEER MEMORANDUM S 1> O 1< A N 1= PLANNING DEPARTMENT April 15, 1993 Mike Hunt North Idaho Engineering West 4200 Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 Dear Mr. Hunt: Your documentation concerning the Riverway Villa final plat submittal shows a timely request was made. The Spokane County Planning Department will withdraw the denial of your request for a time extension. Your appeal to the Hearing Examiner Committee will be removed from the May agenda following a written request from you. A request for updated conditions will be sent w all departments /agencies of jurisdiction and recommendations will be incorporated into the revised Findings and Decision. Unfortunately, your final plat documents were lost during our recent move to the new Public Works Building. .Please resubmit nine copies of your final plat and three copies of your current plat certificate Final plat review and circulation will be completed after the time extension decision has been issued. Any fees paid to the department for your appeal will be adjusted towards you final plat or refunded. Sincerely, Wallis Hubbard, Director c: Paul Jensen, Senior Planner County Engineer County Utilities County Health District wFST 1026 BROADWAY AVENUE id itt C 0 LJ NJ m l' WALLIS D. HUBBARD, DIRECTOR RECEIVED APR 1 9 1993 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0240 • (509) 45b- 2205E ENGINEER, SPOKANE COUNTY COURTHOUSE DATE: October 7th , 1988 Thank you. DSA:jp Enclosure /d ,' o Jq dihO l VA-L Sipe 1%7E: Letjamyrkr PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE A56 -2205 SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99260 TO: County Engineers: Utilities: Health llistrict: & Safety FROM: DOUG, AS S. ADAMS. Subdivision Administrator S11R.1FCT: Extension of Time PE- 1414 -81 Riverwav Villa and ,PE-151n-85 and SP- 84 -2R1 Trentwnnd /Cmmmarrial The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached request for an Extension of Time to finalize the plat of SP- R4 -2R1 and PF- 1414 -R1 Rivarway Villa and PE- 1510 -85 Trentwood Commercial Center If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should be made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to us by October 21, 1988. ComznaA/rs SENT /0 -2l -Sk Canter •00•••C COV•TY COV•T HOV•• County Engineer; Utilities; Health District; To: Building & Safety FROM: Douglas S Adams, Subdivision Administrator SUBJECT: Extensions of Time review If you have should be to us bl September 24, 1986. Thank you. DSA: , •- • • - • •- • PE- 1206 -B -78 PN- 1401A -81 PN- 1427 -83 C PE- 1414 -81 PE- 1294 -79 •PE- 1371 -80 PE- 1409 -81 PN 1282 - 78 PN- 1284 -79 PN- 1376 -80 pN- 1377 -80 - Summerfield East - Shenandoah Forest Park 1st - The Farm - Riverway Villa - Vercler Road Professional Park - Monaco Addition - Highland Estates (Monte Del Rey) - Glenpark Addition - Gleneden Sth Addition - Nakata's 7-Mile Estates - Wittkopp's 7 - Mile Estates F = INTEROFFICE MEMO F7= MEMORANDUM OFFICE Cf THE PLANNING DFPARffmT DATE September 9 • 1986 AtaArs— The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached requests for Extensions of Time to finalize the plats. comments on the proposed extensions or believe additional conditions reliminary plat approval, please forward comments (CHECK ONE BOX) _ - inter-office Communication Per your request, we have reviewed the files of new "Conditions of Approval" to add at this time: FVtanctnn Regnegt4 PE- 1206 -B -78 Stumerfield East • PN- 1401A -81 'Shenandoah Forest Park 1st PN- 1427 -83 - PE-1414-81 PE- 1294 -79 .'PE- 1371 -80 PE- 1409 -21 PN- 1282 -78 PN- 1284 -79 Ph- 1376 -80 PN- 1377 -80 County Subdivision Administrator County Engineer / OFFICE OF COUNTY, ENGINEER :SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ,. . Date September 16 11 - Vercler Road Professional Park - Monaco Addition Highland Estates (Monte Del Rey) ' Glenpark Addition •; Gleneden 5th Addition Nakata's 7- Mile Estates • :Wittkopp's 7-Mile Estates listed below. • '#` Vii• S- j<Ck:. PE 141* werwA/ U; 0.. 1: ?c4Nw2 L. W i4 - .I:P E - Rertest& `.4.% CrCY)sof, ,tNSlneer 2. R r AsdsvS oev — //70 ' ' i4 2S St aerie!, s ikCso q SpI So rt• a . r P. Lt. D. !recess AN71cipAlbt C4anyes. b economic C blew) . ct D /SC KfS /!N e/ feoro C4Anpes. A . .'re s T amnion AREA w; a be cistc.47ad Axe % /Trcved Wi M AL) owe trobect. o f stag o-r doopnc4 e' s.se- IZegAa Ifs S 4 Site. F %MK 0 riet SpAC.e /o J I.A1i( to bs� o/ l (%M t'' O f "")45 Q COMm t aa.N) : I "_` a ... 7- BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS QF SPOKANE at `_. to WASHINGTON Wi; { IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PE- 1414 -81, ) RIVERWAY VILIA - PRELIMINARY SUB- ) DIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - ) ZE- 92 -81, AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL ) MOBILE HOME AND COMMERCIAL - PUDE -1 -82 - ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, an overlay zone ) SPONSOR: H & E INVESTMENTS, INC. ) BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 27 day of April, 1982. 53 7 VERNON W. CLERK 0 AND BOARD RO''NNE MONTAGUE, DE NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Allan B. Simpson and Mrs. Allan B. Simpson have withdrawn their appeal of the above captioned proposed plat, zone change and planned unit development overlay. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the appeal hearing on subject matter scheduled for May 4, 1982 at 1:30 P.M. has been CANCELLED. tRECC IVE© n�© unt► "46812€11 "46812€11 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPO NE OUNTY c , WASHINGTON APR1 9l98Z j IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PE- 1414 -81, RIVERWAY VILLA - PRELIMINARY SUB- ) ' DIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - ) NOTICE ZE- 92 -81, AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL ) OF MOBILE HOME AND COMMERCIAL - PUDE -1 -82 - ) PURLIC HEARING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT,an overlay zone ) • SPONSOR: H & E INVESTMENTS, INC. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Mr. and Mrs. Allan B. Simpson have filed a Notice of Appeal of the approval by the Hearing Examiner Committee of the above captioned preliminary subdivision, zone - reclassification & planned unit development overlay zone; and NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will hold a public hearing at 1:30 P.M. on May 4, 1982, at its office in the County Courthouse, West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, Washington, to consider the above described application for Preliminary Subdivision PE- 1414 -81, Zone Reclassification ZE -92 -81 and PUDE -1 -82 overlay on the following described property: Location PUBLISH: SPOKANE VALLEY HERALD APRIL 21, 1982 Spokane Valley, South and adjacent to the Spokane River, East and adjacent to Barker Road, North and adjacent to Mission Avenue, and West and adjacent to Hodges Road extended. Sec. 8 -25 -45 NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony in support of or in opposi- tion to the approval of the Hearing Examiner Committee. APPROVED BY THE BOARD this 13 day of April, 1982. AREA MAP ON REVERSE SIDE VERNON W. OHLAND Clerk of _t - Board by: Ros nne Montague, D -puty RECEIVEL SPOI4t0 fftgtp ItAGMEth APR.! 91982 j "tea PE- 1414 -81 RIVERWAY VILLA P7 -C /b PE-1414.8I 0 ` ®������������ PUDE 1 82 a 118 RCRES Name: Home Phone: 97),_\_... C c i" Hearing Exami Title: Address: 1 C■ vn Preliminary Subdivision N ber: YOUR REASON FOR APPEAL — C :, Lk_ Copies to: Planning //44, Norma- Su:itl�� /u Fee Received: Check.j7 o/ Cash Hearing Date: \IIh:AI Rl:i SI FO RN TO T11E BOARD OF COUNTY COMNISS1.QNERS Appeal ■ (Please Print) Committee Action Being Fee - $75.00 C Address: .� 3/ (7r `.�(�, l A d C�� , t� hOuI .,;Y C O h;.,,Icc!O 'ERS ,I_ Ylt r,(_)oday's Date 1- Appealed .&2- k Code: 99031 Business Phone:' jc ✓n L. J OEC _ 1 -- Zone Reclassification Number: `7 ± Q -tQ I Date Signature: Signature of Authorized Representative: t of Hearing Examiner Committee Action: \P° OFFICE USE ONLY Receipt Number RECEIVED 1.: 1 'P ) • / 0 2 - - - C cy (} coFr 1APOSAfit C10 {;NEIrat APR 91982 0 Engineers //j141 Environmental Health APPEAL <i: u;SF f• HP] . TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COP1f'1ISST`tNERS €Y= CEJVED Appeal Fee - $75.00 (;CG'i`.T'Y COMNISS!opvRS Name: Q � �(c�� � }�lr ,C Yltr( oday's Date - (_2 Please � Pr � int) 0 I ^ Address: J 3z �� . I : AC�CtY� V } Yrxdortp Code: 99037 9 \- q ( Home Phone: Hearing Exami- Committee Action Being Appealed Title: Hearing Date: !0 Business Phone: Preliminary Subdivision N . ber: ` L1. \-J 1 - Zone Reclassification Number: 2 E r _ t Date of Hearing Examiner Committee Action:c.� Signature: Signature of Authorized Representative: ` -1,1L Address ff -`1. � L(� Jle)3 YOUR REASON) FOR APPEAL OFFICE USE ONLY � Copies to: Planning A.t / Engineers ., Environmental Health Fee Received: Check/75 e. / Cash Receipt Number �/ �- ,_� at' LC , L. 9.6 1.4L4 3 / 3 09 z_ _ . Segfers I . c/4-1 1 . a er es1 ws -sok • __ _ _ _ -.J _ (p4 Seek _ eovytinlizItee's. 7 .0n. Lk) tit OL-t to c lo 4,1 La- • o-y:n s o-c Can s _ No f>.‘"064.e6n y 2tinnir q Co git/c0-7 5 , \-ke. , ebnALA Terri - - - 04) - - ecivLckae _ / - Pea os,:t (Art- A 5 • eke., - a . Jafs 7e6 t 7. 1/4flpu cat €AekticiA to yzi Ltrie,,, rr &cod fa. tr. . ehetzt _Les • •A;;k(ri .—.. at 1): I Ce 11:ne, 13 or Leo o Tho-i-eon_ SuLte 3 'on!" ? rait tAirt-s- - - S e' is° er - 5 d __1?1 kkIn ; 7 R e r _ spon 5 tiO 7 / O c"*Al 2-3 \ ECilnesevli- • CLAna WC) e..,tcts • op-es---7 e 5 Prbk af ee-C n ,Z 2/Led 0--x/' 3/30/ ,z shell abe.ct - -School Mchbtt.0 -bIcte i S. _n-_ CP.+ vn..Q_, Q I c k.-- ut .. _? o. n.T- _ -co .r . .. s b (zoo / e4s :lc4,zeAl. /ors `-ra. ;Si c-. o■ I - � - (Cov»ces ?) e� Cyr, a C C-rA _ /g 2 6 B ,qldcv;.J - /r c- o,0 e4ctr• . C' e,an c am( 4 -t &t l ke �-, . _on . le. n �r `trq - t J e_ . eon; crs OF ? s e4 *• D o-p v .1 a-. 2- MA t s a f JUkukixlt__ _hewn es .ovt _B . _Doe s iL/ot /here. Ccr c . v_n ?-Y2— �x + �-�4s — — — — a, ` ( V k k t S Cnc* Coll; ev,_ - _ G. _ 1 a.z 1 0 &o c c mryi eery -.O o U_ -1 78-0. . . c Rt__ 9- 3 0 5 C !M \s s ■crn .. _- p. 6_�_e ctec�t . - to _ 0 147 O — . 1 _d a -- Vissl is 2�.� . . Lo-c-‘4-12_, . Roil of. �dA, - e-A f q 4 _S _ on thss ;,,,lo--, an-e12 .3kkk — t ,b 1 s 2 cr c e s . G<J/l: av+'1I i (a-.,il • • _ 5 L.. y , e c s aiz, ct;fr ..,42. -, . -- dias:2__ .-t- ., __a_,-±v- ■ito--u e _ .0 - .: - di aw4 _ Tea. f roc a, a •tid n e _ . _aAs a- (-102-190 --p R g_ Pn f&ct.), (bow. tern Q be b u s - Cu""mt .. 0-4 thy /WTfSY/ °' t -- (t anreoe. o ut ant. S ee diems, e � ck -r/v1.'bay n IV 13 0 2- Bo ua is l Q c/ . o_u)'3 Veo ? . s /10 - - ee k iI3 Q,!'_ _ 4 - B 0 Q. 1 U\ SS « — 6 QA Lusn 4L != C onom c feels; b // 17 U; i( . o -1 2 cI to Wet i an • -. en?� es7.7 r oc r osed) 5 b crIM Tu-Ar )(3 ems( c o- t.o -y . e I e. SS %. b Le 4 f � C�"�/J?to- .-..�: ckzi 4 ,Do esr & 0 g sp tsg o t. ) h M A US or> s 141 S a'P'Ied . 6 kRk.' -r - ct.A- _ Tr P, Trct4c t-c . Dcvtck_Q ck R ar,,t.o S 1(10,J). c c, r-o-v-e_ B ;a-ke 2 Sow s a- vt-ti tJc _ e0-c12/0 _tin o _ Ctcto_ ) S L.art__- lays. _ _ 1 A° 4 - cc a 9O5" - .57La._ 2,,e /de . Disc e A-) r i, i2l� a-vtd C Ant. ‘1a i c n: To. 1 1/4D p -o o Ca) Q esp ev- s I ; ' t . o DR-odor- -1 -R/ "-- - - OE) = - 9e_ rift - ter �e�. to_ haf P o s e (e Good Palest tAfon /r -c :c — Sci cra / % }sad t -Rea son akfr _ Sven s or. - _ _ r° Subdivision Hearinc-:. _ 3 Examiner Committee ` Action March 30, 1982 7. PUDE -4 -80 and ZE- 155 -80, Liberty Lake Village - Extension of Time For Sub- , Location: Comprehensive Proposal: Action: 8. ZW- 137 -81, Location: Located northeast and adjacent the City of Cheney between the Northern Pacific Railroad and the Cheney - Marshall Road. Sec. 7 -23 -42 Comprehensive Plan: INDUSTRIAL Proposal: Rezone approximately 39 acres from Agricultural to Restricted Industrial with no proposed use. Action: Continue until May 6, 1982. 9. ZN- 151 -81, Rezone Agricultural to Restricted Industrial - Hanson Properties, Inc. Location: Located adjacent the City of Spokane east of Nevada Street and south of Magnesium Road. Sec. 20 -26 -43 Comprehensive Plan: URBAN Proposal: Rezone approximately 40 acres from Agricultural to Restricted Industrial with no proposed use. Continue until May 6, 1982. F &O -J /b PE - 1414 - 81) Riverway Villa - Preliminary Subdivision and Reclassification - H & E Investments, Inc. Agricultural to R.M.H. and Commercial Planned Unit Development, an overlay zone 7 F -92 -, PUDE -1 -82 Location: Comprehensive Proposal: Action: mittal of Final Development Plans - Liberty Lake Village, Ltd. Generally located at the southeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Liberty Lake Road. Sec. 22 -25 -45 Plan: URBAN Residential Planned Unit Development of 94 detached single - family units. Approved - Unanimous Rezone Agricultural to Restricted Industrial Pat Whitehill and Walt Powers Spokane Valley, south and adjacent the Spokane River, east and adjacent Barker Road, north and adjacent Mission Avenue, and west and adjacent Hodges Road extended. Sec. 8 -25 -45 Plan: URBAN 118 acres into 365 residential lots, 1 commerical Approval - Unanimous NOTE: Hearing Examiner Committee member substitution; John Culler for Jane Myers AGENDA March 30, 1982 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING: SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: PLACE: 9 A.M. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS - EXTENSIONS OF TIME Item 1. PS- 1067 -77, LILY ADDITION ZS -3 -77, Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban V.E. Cameron Page 1 Item 2. Item 3. PE- 1168E -78, ZE- 13 -78, Item 4. Item 5. Item 6. PRELIMINAR Item 10 Item Withdrawn Page 2 PE- 1232A -79, ZE- 32 -79, PE- 1236 -78, ZE- 151 -78, PE- 1366 -80, ZE- 18 -80, Item 8 ZW- 137 -81 Item 9. ZN- 151 -81 PE- 1414 -81, ZE- 92 -81, PUDE -1 -82 Tuesday, March 30, 1982 - 9 A.M. Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington MIDILOME 2ND ADDITION Agricultural to R -1 Simpson Engineers Page 3 SEXTON'S ADDITION Agricultural to R -1 Daniel B. Clark Page 4 JANKE ADDITION Agricultural. to R -1 and R -2. • Charles E. Simpson Page 5 BLUE SKIES 2ND ADDITION Agricultural to R -1 Senske & Associates Page 6 9 A.M. (OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS POSSIBLE) ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS Item 7. PUDE -4 -80, LIBERTY LAKE VILLAGE Extension of Time for Final Development Plan. Liberty Lake Village, Ltd Page 7 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL Whitehili & Powers ....... 8 AGRICULTURAL, TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL Hanson Properties, Inc. Page 9 1:30 P.M. (OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS POSSIBLE) ZONE CHANGE RIVERWAY VILLA Agricultural to RMH and Commercial Planned Unit Development, an overlay zone H & E Investments Page 10 AGENDA: MARCH 30, 1982 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME• Tuesday, March 30, 1982 - 1:30 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible (Item #10 on Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND RECLASSIFICATION PE- 1414 -81, RIVERWAY VILLA ZE- 92 -81, AGRICULTURAL TO R.M.H. AND COMMERCIAL PUDE -1 -82, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, an overlay zone a. LOCATION: Spokane Valley, south and adjacent .the Spokane River, east and adjacent Barker Road, north and adjacent Mission Avenue, and west and adjacent Hodges Road. extended. b. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 8, Township 25, Range 45. The portion of land south of the Spokane River in the west half of Section 8, T25N, R45 EWM, in Spokane County, State of Washington being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 20 feet north of the southwest corner of said Section 8 and 30 feet east of the west line of said Section, thence north 939.33 feet, thence east 370.00 feet, thence north 650.00 feet, thence west 210.00 feet, thence north 100 feet, thence. east 40 feet, thence north 100 feet, thence west 200.00 feet, thence north 383.62.feet, thence east 300 feet, thence north 81 °16' east 990.56 feet, thence north 63 ° 49' east 685.80 feet, thence north 55 ° 52' east 772.64 feet, thence south 00 °56'58" east 1784.50 feet, thence north 89 ° 25' west 648.41 feet, thence south 00 °42'44" east 1303.43 feet, thence north 89±21'46" west 1931.50 feet to the point of beginning. c. SPONSOR: d. SURVEYOR/ENGINEER: e.. SITE'. SIZE: f. NUMBER OF LOTS: g. PROPOSED LAND USE: h. EXISTING ZONING: i. PROPOSED ZONING: H & E. Investments, Inc. E. 6614 Main • Spokane, WA 99206 Inland Pacific Engineering Co. E. 12720 Nora. Avenue Spokane, WA 99216 118 acres 365 residential lots, 1 commercial Planned Unit Development for mobile and modular homes with a commercial site. Agricultural Residential Manufactured Homes with Planned Unit Development and Commercial PE- 1414 -81 RIVERWAY VILLA j. k. 1. m. n. P7 -C /b COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: URBAN Category Consolidated Irrigation District 1119 Central Valley School Dist.11361 Community septic tanks and drainfields A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197 -10 -330 (2) provides that: "...In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." An Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared for this project and circulated for public response and comments. A copy of the document is available for public inspection at the Spokane Public Library or the Spokane County Planning Department, Broadway Centre Building, North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington. WATER SOURCE: SCHOOL DISTRICT: METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: o. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The 118 -acre proposed will have one 10 -acre commercial site to serve local needs and will have 108 acres for 365 manufactured home lots (a mix of rental and owned lots). As a planned unit development, approximately 44% of the site, or 38 acres, will be common areas used as open space which will be owned and developed by a Home Owners' Association. Current development plans for the open space provide sites for pathways, trails, picnic sites, horseshoe pits, volleyball courts, tennis courts, swimming pool, outdoor shelters, recreation buildings, and visitor parking, as well as mini storage for the residences of the proposal. The proposal is to be developed in phases over approximately 8 years. • PE- 1414 -81 RIVERWAY VILLA 2 0 t. A P7 -C /b PE•1µ14 -81 ZE•3Z-81 PUDE -1-8Z 118 ACRES AVENUE EEWA 61 PE- 1414 -81 RIVERWAY VILLA P7 -C /b J. k. 1. m. n. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: URBAN Category WATER SOURCE: SCHOOL DISTRICT: METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Consolidated Irrigation District 1119 Central Valley School Dist.( &361 Community septic.tanks and drainfields A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197 -10 -330 (2) provides that: "...In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." An Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared for this project and circulated for public response and comments. A copy of the document is available for public inspection at the Spokane Public Library or the Spokane County Planning Department, Broadway Centre Building, North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington. o. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The 118 -acre proposal will have one 10 -acre commercial site to serve local needs and will have 108 acres for 365 manufactured home lots (a mix of rental and owned lots). As a planned unit development, approximately 44% of the site, or 38 acres, will be common areas used as open space which will be owned and developed by a Home Owners' Association. Current development plans for the open space provide sites for pathways, trails, picnic sites, horseshoe pits, volleyball courts, tennis courts, swimming pool, outdoor shelters, recreation buildings, and visitor parking, as well as mini storage for the residences of the proposal. The proposal is to be developed in phases over approximately 8 years. 10 A PE- 1414 -81 RIVERWAY VILLA P7 -C /b 108 PE- 1414 -81 2E-32-81 PUDE -1-82 118 RCRES . STAFF ANALYSIS - March 30, 1982 PE- 1414 -81, RIVERWAY VILLA ZE- 92-81, AGRICULTURAL TO R.M.H. AND COMMERCIAL PUDE 1 82, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, an overlay zone PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION I. GENERAL INFORMATION 10 C a. Location Spokane Valley, south and adjacent the Spokane River, east and adjacent Barker Road, north and adjacent Mission Avenue, and west and adjacent Hodges Road extended. B. Proposal - the project site is 118 acres to be developed as a Planned Unit Development for manufactured homes (owned and rental) with a commer- cial site. - 108 acres of the site is residential area 16 acres are 365 lots (4,800 sq. ft. to 6,600 sq. ft.) each with 60 -foot road frontage. 21 acres are paved access. 71 acres are open space with 38 acres as common open space. - 10 acres of the site are for local or neighborhood commercial. C. Existing Land Use 1. Existing Land Uses Project site is currently used for agricultural as a cultivated field with strip of pasture on the north. North is a 50 -foot strip of land owned by Inland Paper Company, then the Spokane River, and across the river is a large development known as Barker Road Mobile Homes with manufac- tured homes. On the west side of Barker and north of the river are three other manufactured home developments. West across Barker are scattered single - family homes among small cultivated fields between the River and Indiana, Indiana across Mission and down to Boone are single - family homes in R -1 subdivision known as "Simpson Addition" and further south are Agricultural Suburban subdivisions known as "Valley View Addition" and "Bates Addition ".. South across Mission is Central Valley School District's "Barker Administration Center" and moving eastward are three single- family homes, a water tank, and two manufactured homes with small cultivated fields behind them. Further east or SE of _tli'e project site is a manufactured home development known as "Mission Villa ". East along Mission Avenue is a single- family home and a few. hundred feet eastward is a small manufactured home develop- ment known as "Cronk Addition ". All the remaining adjacent lands to the east of the proposal are large cultivated fields. STAFF ANALYSIS - MA, 30, 1982 RIVERWAY VILLA (cont.) GENERAL INFORMATION (cont.) C. Existing Land Use (cont.) . 2. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses This project is located in a vicinity of the valley that is in transition from agricultural uses to residential development. The vicinity is approximately 50% developed and with similar land uses to the north across the river and along Mission to the southeast. The single - family home developments to the west and southwest are adequately separated by Barker Road, a major arterial. The proposed commercial use is at the intersection of two arterials which is a proper location for neighborhood/ local serving commercial. The project is buffered by the river, Barker, and Mission and therefore, is found to be compatible with existing land uses. D. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan Map Category is URBAN. This proposal complies with the purpose and intent of this category as being "city- like" development with maximum level of public services and facilities. The proposal is to have neighborhood commercial to serve the project and. local area. The proposal will provide its own "open- space" and recreational facilities through the Home Owners' Association and /or sponsor. Fill -in. This project constitutes "fill -in" and an efficient use of existing public services and facilities. Variety of lifestyle. The proposal will provide a distinct and more affordable living area with manufactured homes, which is one of the varied lifestyles in the Urban category. Buffering.. The river, Barker and Mission all serve to be a physical buffer to adjacent land uses. Buffering to the east is not necessary at this time since the adjacent land is a cultivated field. Utilities. The proposal intends to install underground utilities for best aesthetic setting. Sidewalks. Sidewalks are to be installed along the arterials, Barker & Mission, and the collector, Indiana. In addition, the Home Owners' Association will attempt, through the development plan, to provide trails throughout the project over the open spaces provided for trails and other common uses. Water Quality. Both storm water treatment and sewage effluent is being managed in a•.w y to protect the aquifer, including mini- warehouse storage limitations. Energy Management. Of the 365 residential lots, 143 will have good southerly solar exposure (within ± 20° off south). North zero lot line construction of residences will be allowed to assure 10 D STAFF ANALYSIS - M.ch 30, 1982 ' _ RIVERWAY VILLA (cont.) I. GENERAL INFORMATION (coat.) D. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan (cont.) Energy Management (cont.) maximum opportunity for solar access /exposure within each given lot. Such house orientation on a lot also allows maximum -size yards. Transportation. Park and ride facilities are called for in commer- cial development; this will be a condition to be considered when the details of the binding site plan are being approved by the County Zoning Administrator. Waste Water Management Plan. The proposal lies substantially inside the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA). Therefore, the entire site will be considered within this PSSA boundary and an interim sewage treatment system will be approved. Also, the PSSA boundary is currently being proposed to be changed, moving it north to the river. In summary, the proposal does significantly comply with the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan MAP & TEXT because of its size, development design and location. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION A. Project Design The proposal is designed to have 365 residential manufactured home lots among common open space, to have a 200 -foot wide passive recre- ation area along the Spokane River, and a 10 -acre commercial site at the southwest corner of the proposal. The design includes two residential areas, the area composed of about half the overall site is predominantly for privately -owned lots and the area just east of the commercial site is separated without road connections for the opportunity of rental lots. The open spaces will connect the entire site with trails or pathways and including sidewalks along Indiana, Barker, and Mission. The open spaces will accommodate recreational facilities as may be developed by the Home Owners' Association and /or sponsor. B. Project Development Timing The proposal is proposed to be developed in approximately 8 phases of similar size, over an 8- to 10 -year time period. Any adverse impacts created by this proposal such as traffic and schools will be somewhat mitigated since the impacts will be spread over 8- to 10 -years and not occur,a'1 at once, thus giving the affected public agencies the time necessary to program improvements and /or methods of handling any impacts. C. Circulation The County Road Engineer has identified a need to improve Barker and Mission to handle the traffic generated by both the residential lots and the commercial site of this proposal. 10 E STAFF ANALYSIS - Marco 30, 1982 - ..IVERWAY VILLA (cont..). II. SPECIAL INFORMATION C. Circulation (cont.) Washington State Department of Transportation indicates that when Barker /I -90 Interchange reaches its traffic safety limitations, it will need to be improved. That if this proposal and its additional traffic cause these limits to be reached, the State will require Spokane County to pay a share of the improvement costs to Barker /I -90 Interchange. The County Engineer is recommending that prior to finalizing each phase of this proposal that a traffic analysis will be conducted to determine what current the traffic safety limits are as they relate to Barker /I -90 Interchange. The County Engineer further recommends that this proposal will be required to pay its proportional share of this Barker /I -90 Interchange improvement costs if the interchange reaches the traffic safety limits. D. Sewage Disposal As mentioned earlier, the proposal is substantially inside the Priority Sewer Service Area of the Wastewater Management Plan, which calls for public sewers. Since public sewerage collection system does not exist in this area to date, the health authorities will allow an interim sewage system. This interim system will include wet sewer lines, community septic tanks and community drainfields all within the site and is to be conditioned to hook up to the future area -wide sewer collection system when it is available. The interim drainfield areas will include some of the open -space and a number of residential lots, which will not be allowed to have building permits until the community drainfields are abandoned when approved by County Utility Department. Grading activity over these community drainfields will require both the Washington State Department of Ecology and County Health approval to assure proper drainfield operation per the type soil and soil zones relative to the drainlines. E. Drainage Final construction plans are to be reviewed and approved by both the County Engineer and County Health District. Part of the review is to consider the surface water run -off and percolation into grassy swales to protect the aquifer, while assuring proper operation of the community drainfields. F. Water Supply The proposal is located,w''zthin the recorded service area of Consoli- dated Irrigation District 1119. The District advises the staff that adequate system capacity, and a desire on their part to serve, exists for the provision of water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses, as well as commercial uses. 10 F :STAFF ANALYSIS - Marci ;, 1982 111/ERWAY VILLA (cont.) II. SPECIAL INFORMATION (cont.) G. Fire Protection The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Fire District #1. The Fire District requests that two north -south emergency vehicle accesses from Mission to the interior of the proposal be accomplished. Also that the final plat roads be given names that best align existing east -west and north -south roads. Staff is recommending that one north -south road hehind the commercial site be designed for a "crash gate" northward to Indiana so as to retain the sponsor's option for the design objective to separate a lot rental area from the lot owned area. An alternate route to the interior of this proposal, the "crash gate ", will eliminate the need to use Barker which will be a busy arterial. As development occurs eastward, the problem will be resolved when Hodges or Rockford are extended from Indiana to Mission. H. Schools Proposal lies within the boundaries of Central Valley School District 1/356. The District's planning staff indicated that this proposal will have a significant impact on the school district since, when the proposal is fully developed, it is estimated that 200 elementary students will need district service. This represents 40% of an elementary school. Due to potential crowding and bussing conditions in the future, the School District is asking that the District be allowed to reach an agreement with the sponsor to mitigate these impacts prior to finalization of any phase of this proposal. I. Parks The only existing recreation facility in the near vicinity is Sullivan Park 10 -acre picnic /recreation area at Sullivan Road and north of Spokane River. Since this proposal has open -space with plans to have active and passive recreation on the site as developed and supported by the Home Owners' Association and /or sponsor, increasing demand is not expected for public parks use. Additionally, the _ 'C CE, p sponsor indicates willingness to dedicate a public bicycle and hiking trail /use easement along the Spokane River to Spokane County S 4 Parks Department. i S r PR B r- J. Unique Environmental Features • The report "Planning for Parks" (revised 1976) indicates that this proposal is within Greenacres //3 neighborhood, which shows a proposed community park north of Mission and in the vicinity of Hodges Road. The project's northerly boundary is in part of the Spokane River Ecosystem. 1.0 G p Aso /9erT-j STAFF ANALYSIS - lch 30, 1982 RIVERWAY VILLA (cont.) II. SPECIAL INFORMATION (cont.) K. Cultural Resources None have been identified, but the standard condition has been recommended requiring notification of State and County agencies if archaeological materials are discovered. L. Shoreline A portion of the north 200 feet of the proposal is within a PASTORAL classification of the Shoreline Management Act. Limited development would occur within.the prescribed 200 -foot setback area defined in the Shoreline Management Act. To enhance and preserve the natural area along the river, jogging trails, exercise stations, picnic areas and outdoor shelters may be installed within the area. A Substantial Development Permit will be needed. M. Agricultural Suitability This proposal is on agricultural farmland designated as "Prime Farm Land "; however, this criteria and many other local and area -wide type information and data was considered in the development and approval of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan has determined that it is in the interest of the public's general welfare to plan for this area to be developed as URBAN. Agricultural land uses are not compatible in URBAN. III. ZONING ANALYSIS A. Existing Zoning PROJECT Site is zoned Agricultural. NORTH across the Spokane River is zoned Residential Mobile Homes (R.M.H.) and Agricultural. WEST from north to south respectively, Agricultural, Agricultural Surburban (A.S.), Single Family (R -1) and A.S. beyond Mission. SOUTH is zoned Agricultural and further east along Mission on the south side is zoned R.M.H. EAST is zoned Agricultural with a small area zoned R.M.H. along Mission on the north side. B. Proposed Zone Change The applicant is requesting to change the zone classification from Agricultural to RMH withCan overlay zone, P.U.D. for the entire proposal except for 10 acres in the southwest corner of the proposal which is being requested to change from Agricultural to Commercial. 10 H STAFF ANALYSIS - Mac. 30, 1982 IVERWAY VILLA (coat.) III. ZONING ANALYSIS (cont.) C. Planned Unit Development If approved, a FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN will be required to be reviewed and approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee in a public hearing within one year of preliminary plat approval. This development plan is to include an overall Estimated Construction Schedule for improve- ments of the common open space, recreational facilities, and other uses or improvements; this schedule may extend beyond the 8- to 10 -year finalization period. In addition, the final development plan is to include a more specific Minimum Construction Schedule, which is to expand on cost estimates and funding methods by a Home Owners' Association and /or the sponsor. This Minimum Construction Schedule will probably be binding based on the Hearing Examiner Committee's conditions of approval for the final development plan. These schedules are needed to assure minimum improvements and land- scaping be accomplished, that if left to a Home Owners' Association these improvements may not be realized. The Hearing Examiner Committee, during the Final Development Plan Review, may wish to add conditions that assure certain minimum improvements be made on a particular phase before the next phase could be finalized. This development plan should include complete package of by -laws, protective covenants and articles of incorporation, if applicable, for a Home Owners' Association to assure maintenance, operation and /or development of the common open spaces and related improvements, as may apply to the final development plan. D. Binding Site Plan for Commercial Site A SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN(S) will require the County Zoning Administrator approval prior to issuing any building permits on the commercial 10 -acre site. The Zoning Administrator will review a detailed development site plan for any or all of the 10 -acre site and will review it for conformance to the County Zoning Ordinance standards, compatibility of adjacent and /or approved land uses, type of commercial uses permitted not to exceed the intent for neighbor- hood or local serving -type commercial services and facilities, and any other criteria pertinent to public, health, safety and general welfare. Among others, the specific site development plan is to include: building location, size, profile, setback, and use; land- scaping; lighting; signing; parking; drainage; bus stop facility; park and ride option for bus stop; buffering between commercial and residential uses as noise attenuating and visual screening, such as a 5 -ft. masonry fence; ingress and egress; turn for shopping_ center; others as may result from the various agency review of this development plan. If the - Zoning Administrator or the applicant deems it necessary, this review can be made at a Hearing Examiner Committee public hearing for site plan approval. 1 0 I STAFF ANALYSIS - Mth 30, 1982 RIVERWAY VILLA (cant.) both will require additional agency review by all departments and /or a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner Committee, and further consid- ering that forthcoming public testimony would not identify unanticipated and unresolvable problems, Staff recommends APPROVAL. This recommendation of approval is in part based an the following conditions and therefore Staff additionally recommends that the following conditions be attached to the Hearing Examiner Committee approval, if approval is granted. III. ZONING ANALYSIS (cont.) E. Zoning Compatibility The applicant requests a zone change to RMH with an overlay zone P.U.D. and a 10 -acre commercial zone in the southwest corner of the proposal. All zone changes due to existing land uses, existing zoning, existing buffering and specific site plan review for the commercial site are found to be compatible and appropriate. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to Chapter 43.21C, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance, an environmental impact statement was prepared for this project. This Draft, Environmental Impact Statement was issued on December 15, 1981. Public comments and remarks by consulted agencies and individuals were received on or before January 19, 1982, and incorporated into the Final EIS which was issued on March 19, 1982. The EIS disclosed several probable adverse impacts which may be mitigated through the attachment of conditions. These impacts and possible condi- tions will be considered at the public hearing by the Hearing Examiner Committee. V. LEAD AGENCY RECOMMENDATION The County Planning Department is considering: 1. That the proposal is found to be compatible with existing land uses; and 2. That the proposal is found to be significantly in compliance with the Spokane County adopted Comprehensive Plan; and 3. That the proposal and its requested zone change is found to be compatible with the adjacent zoning; and 4. 'That the proposal, as conditioned, is found to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts; and • 5. That the proposal is found to properly address other plans and regulations of the County as mentioned in the Staff Analysis, and also noting, that the detailed specifics of the: 6. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN of the P.U.D.; and 7. The SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS(S) for the 10 -acre Commercial site 10 J . STAFF ANALYSIS - Me 30, 1982 $RIVERWAY VILLA (cont.) VI. CONDITIONS If approval is granted; the following conditions are recommended. PLANNING CONDITIONS 1. That the plat be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and /or attached sheets as noted. 2. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for three (3) years to April 1, 1985. The applicant may request a one (1) year Extension of Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. Such applications should demonstrate the progress made toward finalizing this prelimi- nary plat. If a Time Extension is not requested in a timely manner or a Time Extension is not granted, then the preliminary plat approval is NULL & VOID. 3. That phasing of the preliminary plat is required for 6 to 8 similar - sized phases as approved by the County Subdivision Administrator. The purpose is to equally distribute any impact on the public roadways and public school district ove an 8 or more year finalization period. NOTE: Time Extensio s will be necessary, since more than 3 years are needed to finalize t is preliminary plat; but Extensions are not guaranteed and additional conditions may be added by the Hearing Examiner Committee as recommended by the reviewing agencies. 4. That Time Extension approvals may be conditioned in a manner to assure the elimination of conditions which are significantly adverse to or conditions which cause serious deterioration of public health, safety or general welfare, such as traffic safety, overcrowding of school facilities and others.. 5. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 77 -1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements. 6. That each phase of this proposal be in substantial conformance with the preliminary plat of record as approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations, when approved by the County Subdivision Administrator, will be permitted, while variations not so approved are to be heard by the Hearing Examiner Committee as "change of conditions" in a public hearing. 7. That a name be indicated before each final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 8. That appropriate street names be indicated, and approved by the County Subdivision Administrator. 9. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat or particular phase of it, for distribution 10 K STAFF ANALYSIS - jch 30, 1982 RIVERWAY VILLA (cont.) VI. CONDITIONS (cont.) PLANNING CONDITIONS (cont.) 9. (continued) to the Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of each final plat. 10. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), fire protection district, and County Building and Safety Department will certify, prior to the filing of each phase of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of each final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in that phase, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. Each plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "the public water system, as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and County Building & Safety Department, and purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." 11. That a current certificate of title be furnished the Planning Depart- ment prior to the filing of each final plat. 12. That a statement be placed in the dedication of each final plat to the effect that: "no more than one dwelling unit be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots.;or building sites without first filing a replat." 13. That zero lot lines are hereby approved for northerly lot lines for solar access /exposure within each lot as approved by County Building & Safety Department, and the County Subdivision Administrator for proper building separation and fire safety requirements. 10 L STA7r ANALYSIS - Ma 30, 1982 %RIVERWAY VILLA (cont.) VI. CONDITIONS (cont.) PLANNING CONDITIONS (cont.) 14. That if the sponsor /applicant opts to establish solar access /exposure easements for a particular phase of this proposal, a copy of a "draft" final plat showing the location of proposed structures and building setback lines will be submitted for review and approval by County Building & Safety Deaprtment and County Subdivision Admini- strator to determine which lots may utilize zero lot line setbacks and any other measures necessary to assure fire safety and proper solar access. 40/3 erl Q_r . ' t 4 CA +f� ' _ \ p • 15. That special language will made be part of each plat dedication, which utilize zero lot lines, identifying the "zero lot line" lots and blocks and any necessary restrictions to assure long term fire safety and solar access, as approved by the County Subdivision Administrator and Prosecuting Attorney's Office. 16. That each final plat, which utilize zero lot lines, will show neces- sary map - related information for zero lot line approved solar access/ exposure easement as approved by the County Subdivision Administrator. 17. That within one (1) year from the date of this preliminary plat approval (April 2, 1982), the sponsor shall submit for review and approval by the Hearing Examiner Committee, FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS for the P.U.D.identifying limitations on the use and design of the site and other information as called for in the P.U.D. classification of the County Zoning Ordinance. 18. That the FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN is to include: a. agreement for Spokane County Parks Department to acquire a Public Trail Easement the full length of the proposal along the Spokane River, which is to include the manner and timing of the trail being improved. b. Estimated construction schedule for the total long -term develop- ment of the open space as landscaping, recreational facilties and other improvements. List by type (referring to the Final Development Plan for location) and give estimated date of completion (this may go well beyond.finalizatin of the plat). c. Minimum construction schedule for those items in (b.) above, which are specifically planned to be improved as the plat is being finalized. Each item should have the estimated cost of construction, when the improvement is to be made as it relates to a particular phase of the proposal being finalized, and the method of funding the improvement (as Home Owners' Association and /or sponsor). NOTE: These three supplements to the Final Development Plan are to allow the Hearing Examiner Committee a perspective of what, when and how the common open space is going to be developed and /or maintained. Minimum and scheduled improvements may be a condition of approval of the Final Development Plan. 1 0 M STAFF ANALYSIS -h 30, 1982 RIVERWAY VILLA (cont.) VI. CONDITIONS (cont.) PLANNING CONDITIONS (cont.) 19. That each final plat substantially conform to the Hearing Examiner Committee approved Final Development Plan as approved by the County Subdivision Administrator. If the County Subdivision Administrator finds it necessary, a final plat that does not substantially conform will be heard by the Hearing Examiner Committee as a "change of conditions" at a public hearing. 20. That an association be formed of all purchasers of lots to establish a common procedure of maintenance of all open spaces, sewer facili- ties and any other items identified in the Final Development Plan. 21. That prior to finalizing any plat, a complete package of by -laws, protective covenants and articles of incorporation, if applicable, for the creation and, and functioning of the Home Owners' Association all will be prepared for review by the Planning Department, Prosecu- ting Attorney's and appropriate departments or agencies. 22. That prior to finalizing any plat, operation and maintenance agree- ments of the Home Owners' Association for the common open areas and related improvements, community sewer system, recreation development program, and any other responsibility all will be prepared for review by Planning Department and appropriate departments or agencies. 23. That proper reference to Home Owners' Association agreements and other auditor recorded documents be made in each final plat dedica- tion so as to notify any potential lot purchaser of such responsi- bilities associated with that lot ownership. 24. Upon the abandonment of this project as authorized by Chapter 4.20, Planned Unit Development, or upon the expiration of three (3) years from the FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN approval, if not by then been com- pleted or have granted an Extension of Time for completion, the authorization shall expire and the land and the structures thereon may be used only for a lawful purpose permissible within the zone in which the planned unit development is located. 25. That the provisions and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance relating to the PUD shall be complied with. 26. That all lots and blocks be indicated and common open space lots be labeled on each Final Plat. 27. That each lot provide for off - street parking as required by the Zoning Ordinance for Residential Manufactured Home Zoning, that is, two (2) parking spots wth 200 sq. ft. per parking spot. 28. That upon filing of each Final Plat the PUD Overlay Zone shall be finalized and the existing Agricultural zone classification changed to R.M.H., except Lot 1, Block 1 which will change to Commercial when filed. 10 N STAFF ANALYSIS - M. i 30, 198.! $ RIVERWAY VILLA (cont.) VI. CONDITIONS (cont.) PLANNING CONDITIONS (cont.) 29. That storage of flammable or hazardous materials are prohibited from being stored in any mini- warehouse units within this proposal, as a measure to protect the aquifer and quality of our drinking water. 30. That each final plat dedication will contain a warning statement regarding the prohibition of storing flammable and hazardous materials as approved by the County Subdivision Administrator, Prosecuting Attorney, and other appropriate department(s). 31. That prior to issuing any building permits on Lot 1, Block 1, the commerical site, a SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN(S) (all or part) must be approved by the County Zoning Administrator, who will receive review comment from appropriate County departments. 32. That the County Zoning Administrator is directed to assure proper compliance with the Zoning Ordinance, assure proper measures for compatibility between existing or future adjacent land uses and the commercial site, assure that the commercial uses do not exceed those of neighborhood and local serving stores or services, and consider accommodation of "Park & Ride" space for the bus and /or a covered bus stop. Some items to be considered are: building size, height and setback; parking; paving; drainage; landscaping; signing; light- ing; buffering delivery truck traffic from adjacent manufactured home with sight and sound obscuring fence (as a 5 -ft. masonry wall); ingress /egress; loading areas; and others. 33. That if the County Zoning Administrator finds it appropriate due to problems or varying opinions, can bring the specific site development before the Hearing Examiner Committee for a decision at a public hearing. 34. That the most easterly final plats contain plat dedication which states: "Active agricultural pursuits with unusual working hours and the spraying of pesticides may be occurring on properties adjacent to lots within this plat until such time as this adjacent property is developed." 35. That a Substantial Development Permit will be needed for some improve- ments within the 200 -ft. Passive Recreation Area. ENGINEER CONDITIONS 1. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to dedication of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record and as approved by the County Engineer. 2. That plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 10 0 STAFF ANALYSIS - "Ph 30, 1982 RIVERWAY VILLA (coot,) VI. CONDITIONS (cont.) ENGINEER CONDITIONS (cont.) 3. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. County Health District approval is also required of the drainage plans since drainage may effect the community.drainfield sites. 4. That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. 5. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/ surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were in- stalled to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 6. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right -of -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 7. All construction within the existing or proposed public right -of -way is to be completed prior to filing each final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construc- tion of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 8. No direct access from lots to stub road connections until such roads are constructed to County standards and established as County roads. 9. Road design, construction, and drainage control for half right -of -ways and stub road connections are the responsibility of the Developer. 10. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded. A 1 -foot strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border each plat boundary. (Temporary cul -de -sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat bound- aries.) 11. A statement must appear in the dedicatory language of each plat that: "Individual driveway access permits will be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system." 12. Dedication of 15 ft. additional right -of -way along Barker Road . Dedication of 10 ft. additional right- of -way along Mission Avenue. 10 P ■ STAFF ANALYSIS - Ma 30, 1982 III RIVERWAY VILLA (cont.) VI. CONDITIONS (cont.) . ENGINEER CONDITIONS (cont.) 13. A statement shall be placed in each plat dedication that: "No direct access be allowed from residential lots to Barker Road or Mission Avenue." 14. Existing County roads providing de-t access to the plat shall be paved and/AT-curbed to the Spokane County Standards. 15. That all public roads within each plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County Standards. 16. That sidewalks are required along the arterial(s) on Barker Road/ Mission Avenue and along the collector Indiana. 17. Tht Public Road Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section be: Section Number 2 for Indiana with Minimum Paving width being the Collector Standard, and Section Number 2 for other public roads with Minimum Paving width being the Access Standard. 18. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees in new construction. 19. That Barker Road be improved to Spokane County Major Arterial Standard on the plat half of the right -of -way. 20. That Mission Avenue be improved to No. 1 Secondary Arterial Standard including a combination bicycle -snow storage lane. Improvements are for the plat half of the right -of -way only. 21. Because of the traffic impacts of this development proposal upon the existing County Road System, it shall be the responsibility of the Developer to provide necessary right - of - way and improve Barker Road from Mission Avenue northward to the river. 22. That improvements to Mission Avenue and Barker Road adjacent to Lot 1 Block 1 shall be a requirement of the zone change and improve- ments will be constructed prior to the issuance of a building permit on that parcel. 23. Improvements to Mission Avenue from the easterly line of Lot 1 Block 1 to the easterly plat boundary will be required as that phase of the project is developed either as a zone change or finalized as a plat. 24. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has re- sponded to the Environmental Impact Statement by stating that the additional traffic generated by this proposal will "cause a severe impact on the Barker Road /I - 90 Interchange." Should it become 10 Q STAFF ANALYSIS - ditch 30, 1982 RIVERWAY VILLA (cont) VI. CONDITIONS (cont.) ENGINEER CONDITIONS (cont.) 24. (cont.) severely impacted the WSDOT would "Look to Spokane County to share in the cost of modifying the structure and /or ramps to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposal." The applicant has indicated that the proposed subdivision /PUD will be phased over an eight -year period with eight or nine phases. A traffic analysis of each phase will be required of the developer and re ewed-by- Spokane County prior to each plat fiaa iza[ion. Tfiis anal' y s will be coordinated with the State of Washington Department of Transportation. If the WSDOT determines that a phase will adverse- ly impact the I -90 facility and Spokane County is required to parti- cipate in the improvement of the Barker Road interchange, Spokane County will require that the plat sponsors pay a share of the improve- ments based upon the proportionate traffic generated from this proposal. A Traffic analysis for each phase will akso serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Should the analysis determine a need for inter- section upgrading, the developer will be assessed a proportionate share for the required improvements. In the event future public agency funds are not available to construct improvements needed to mitigate traffic impacts created by particular phases of the project, the sponsor must provide adequate assurances to guarantee the implementation of the needed improvements or delay the development of the particular phases in question until either private or public funds do become available to construct the needed improvements. 25. That during construction, measures are to be taken to prevent deposit- ing mud onto paved arterial surfaces to minimize air pollution problems. UTILITIES CONDITIONS 1. "The owner, his heirs and successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement distri tt (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended." Each plat dedication is to include this statement. • 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. 10 R STATF ANALYSIS - M VI. CONDITIONS P7 -S HEALTH CONDITIONS 30, 1982 I IIIIRIVERWAY VILLA (cont.) 1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health District prior to any phase being finalized and the issuance of any building permit for this project. 2. A statement shall be placed in the dedication of each plat to the effect that: "A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage systems shall not be author- ized." 3. An on -site sewage management system shall be created and approved by the Spokane County Health District prior to filing of any final plat. Dedicatory language of each plat shall include the statement: "Each lot ownership shall be a member of the on -site sewage manage- ment association until said association is dissolved." 4. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer {Spokane), State Department of Social & Health Services. 5. Prior to filing any final plat; the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on each plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohib- ited." 6. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibted. 7. The community drainfield and sewage treatment facility plans shall be reviewed by the Department of Ecology and shall satisfy their engineering and health regulations prior to finalizing any plat. 8. Prior to any grading of drainfield sites, approval must be given by Washington State Department of Ecology and the Spokane County Health District. The upper soil horizon should be protected in order to provide for optimal treatment of effluent. NATURAL RESOURCE CONDITIONS 1. Commercial removal of top soil is prohibited. 10 T STAFF ANALYSIS - ach 30, 1982 RIVERWAY VILLA (conti) VI. CONDITIONS (cont.) UTILITIES CONDITIONS (cont.) 3. Public Sewers are required. 4. That the appropriate final plats which contain lots over interim community'drainfields shall include the following statement in the final plat dedication: "no building permits will be granted for lots thru of Block until this proposal is connected to an area -wide sewer collection system and release approval is granted by County Utilities Department." NOTE: The blanks are to be filled in as they apply to the final plat, which in total are Lots 1 thru 28 of Block 14, and Lots 38 thru 56 of Block 6. 5. That underground utilities are required with overhead utilities prohibited. HISTORIC PRESERVATION 1. That if any artifactural material is discovered, the Spokane City/ County Historic Preservation Office and the State Office of Archae- ology and Historic Preservation should be contacted immediately. FIRE CONDITONS 1. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water is required. A plat plan showing water distribution and emergency vehicle access is required to be submitted for approval prior to filing each final plat. 2. That a "fire lane" with "crash barriers" be located and constructed for fire truck access at the north end of the north -south road, just east of the commercial site. The fire lane is to cross the open - space area and connect with Indiana, which would have the second "crash barrier." The design and construction is to be reviewed and approved by Fire District #1 and County Road Engineers. That each "crash gate" be properly posted to prevent blocking emergency traffic. 3. That Final plat road names be reviewed by Fire District 111 before each final plat is filed. SCHOOL CONDITIONS 1. That an acceptable agreement exist between the sponsor and Central Valley School District prior to finalizing any phase of the proposal. (See file and EIS) 10 S 9 A.M. TIME: PLACE: Item 2. Item 4. Item 5. Item 7. a Item 8 � ■N AGENDA March 30, 1982 TELEPHONE: .456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING :SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS - EXTENSIONS OF TIME Item 1. PS- 1067 -77, LILY ADDITION ZS -3 -77, Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban V.E. Cameron Page 1 Item Withdrawn Item 3. PE- 1168B -78 ZE- 13 -78, PE- 1232A -79 ZE- 32 -79, PE- 1236 -78, ZE- 151 -78, Item 6 PE- 1366 -80, ZE- 18 -80, ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS PUDE -4 -80, Tuesday, March 30, 1982 - 9 A.M. Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington , MIDILOME 2ND ADDITION Agricultural to R -1 Simpson Engineers , SEXTON'S ADDITION Agricultural to R -1 Daniel B. Clark 9 A.M. (OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS POSSIBLE) JANKE ADDITION Agricultural to R -1 and R -2 Charles E. Simpson BLUE SKIES 2ND ADDITION Agricultural to R -1 Senske & Associates Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 LIBERTY LAKE VILLAGE Extension of Time for Final Development Plan Liberty Lake Village, Ltd Page 7 ZW- 137=81 •AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL Whitehill.& Powers..................Page 8. 0 i 1 J' Item 9. ZN- 151 -81 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL. Hanson Properties, Inc. Page 9 1:30 P.M. (OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS POSSIBLE) PRELIMINARY PLAT AND ZONE CHANGE Item 10. PE- 1414 -81, RIVERWAY VILLA ZE-92 -81, Agricultural to RMH and Commercial PUDE-1-82 Planned Unit Development, an overlay zone H & E Investments Page 10 AGENDA, • March 30, 1982 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Tuesday, March 30, 1982 -9 A.M. (Item #1 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N. 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME PS- 1067 -77, LILY ADDITION ZS -3 -77, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SURBURBAN a. Location: Located in the Moran Prairie area of the Spokane Valley adjacent to and south of 57th Avneue approximately 350 ft. west of the Palouse Highway. b.. Legal Description: Section 3, Township 24N, Range 43 EWM The W 1/2 of the NE. 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 3, except the N 30 ft. thereof. c. Sponsor: Eva Boehm Route 3, Box 541 Spokane, WA 99203 d. Surveyor & Engineer: V. E. Cameron W. 3307 Bismark Avenue Spokane, WA 99208 e. Site. Size: 4.8 acres f. Number. of Lots:. 5 g. Proposed Land Use: Single - family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: Agricultural Suburban j. Water Source: City of Spokane k. School District:• Spokane School District No. 81 1. Environmental Impact: A proposed declaration of non - significance (a preliminary decision, which may be reversed, that an environmental impact statement, an EIS, is not needed) has been administratively issued. This insures the applicant of a timely processing of his /her proposal at the time of the public hearing. BUT, a major purpose of the public hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the decision makers with information as to whether:or not a potential SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE impact upon the physical environment will result from implementation of the proposal,. thus resulting in the need for an EIS However, all "extensions of time" and most "change of conditions" are exempt from the provisions of SEPA; check with the Planning Department staff if uncertainty exists. m. Applicant is requesting a Time Extension until April 1, 1983. P8 -J 2. 1. ` 57111 A - MORAN 6 1 ' = 47111 GI ENN PJEDMONT 1 9 1 3 =3 RO c 53 R0 II h- FIRE STN PS- 1067 -77, LILY ADDITION A VE. ' 6511 1 AVE. 31 32 S3 }} }a 6 }/ 37 36 19 47 al P5106 7-77 4.8AC. • Methodist Church I -: I M Scn00 i • n 1 z N ' O 70 TH I s 0 x • POIONE. TWP25 CITY \\ La irs a .1 a8 49 5 °` 45 T 47 ALP 2 4 _U 56 TH 43R0. AVE. I _ Q z Q 0 2 w J t7 j1146C )1, p 0 • ,aIV./- rr • AGENDA, March 30, 1982 TELEPHONE:. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Thursday, March 30, 1982 - 9 A.M. (Item U 2 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N. 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME PN- 1128 -77, DIJKMAN ADDITION ZN- 135-77, AGRICULTURAL TO R -1 AND R -2 The sponsor's surveyor /engineer, Adams, Benthin & Clark, indicate the sponsor does not wish to request an Extension of Time; therefore this item has been withdrawn. AGENDA, March 30, 1982 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Tuesday, March 30, 1982 - 9 A.M. (Item #3 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N. 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME PE- 1168B -78, MIDILOME 2ND ADDITION ZE- 13 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO R -1 a. Location: Located in the south central Spokane Valley, east of Dishman Mica Road and south of Opportunity, more specifically bounded by Pines, Bowdish Road, 32nd and 40th Avenues. b. Legal Description: Section 33, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM NE 1/4 of Section 33, except Midilome Addition, also except Midilome 1st Addition. Also except r/w for Pines Road; also except r/w for Bowdish Road; also that portion of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 34, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM west of Pines Road extended to Madison Road. c. Sponsor: Midilome, Inc. S. 717 Pines Road Spokane, WA 99206 d.. Engineer /Surveyor: Simpson Engineers N. 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA 99206 e. Site Size: 112 acres f. Number of Lots: 307 g. Proposed Land Use: Single- family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: R -1 j. Water Source: Model Irrigation District #18 k. School District: Central Valley School District #356 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Community Treatment Plant m.. Change of Condition: The sponsor is requesting a Change of Conditions resulting in the realignment of Pines extended, thus creating 3 additional. lots. n. Environmental Impact: A proposed declaration of non- significance (a preliminary decision, which. may be reversed, that an environmental impact statement, an EIS, is not needed) has been administratively issued. This insures the applicant of a timely processing of his /her proposal at the time of the public hearing. BUT, a major purpose of the public hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the.decision makers with information as to whether or not a potential SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE impact upon the physical environment will result from implementation of the proposal, thus resulting in the need for an EIS. However, all "extensions of time" and most "change of conditions" are exempt from the provisions of SEPA; check with the Planning Department staff if uncertainty exists. o. Applicant is requesting a Time Extension until April 1, 1983. P8 -0 PE-11688-78, MIDILOME 2ND ADDITION .11M Mee in r. gum *I IIPIe los • 'rutr 3AS AIM 11111•111 • MO . „Ma 1.-iiW.AINTPPIN nit.; Vent MITIWII AGENDA, March 30, 1982 • TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE' COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME Tuesday, March 30, 1982 - 9 A.M. (Item #4 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N. 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME PE- 1232A -79, SEXTON'S ADDITION ZE- 32 -79, AGRICULTURAL TO R -1 a. Location: Located in the Greenacres area of Spokane Valley south of and adjacent to 4th Avenue and east of and adjacent to Long Road. b. Legal Description: Section 19, Township 25N, Range 45.EWM Lots 7.& 8, Block 28, Corbin Addition to Greenacres located in the NE 1/4 of Section 19, Spokane County, Washington. c. Sponsor: Buddie L. Cook % Valley Carter Co. W. 1047 Garland Spokane, WA 99205 d. Surveyor & Engineer: Daniel B. Clark W 1803 Maxwell Spokane, . WA 99201 e. Site Size: 9.4 acres f. Number of Lots: 17 g. Proposed Land Use: Single - family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: R -1' . j. Water Source: Consolidated Irrigation District #19 k. School District: Central Valley School District #356 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tanks m. Environmental Impact: A proposed declaration of non - significance (a preliminary decision, which may be reversed, that an environmental impact statement, an EIS, is not needed) has been administratively issued. This insures the applicant of a timely processing . of his /her proposal at the time of the public hearing. BUT, a major purpose of the public hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the decision makers with information as -to whether or not a potential SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE. impact upon the physical environment will result from implementation of the proposal, thus resulting in the need for an EIS. However, all "extensions of time" and most "change of conditions" are exempt from the provisions of SEPA; check with the Planning Department staff if uncertainty exists. n. Applicant is requesting a Time Extension until April 1, 1983. P8 -L INTER -STATE HIGHWAY i N° 90 IeHTH AVE PrviCe A(. SE -o c 4ALOO ( m •t • _ •� t d ( : V c It 1 L 7 J i p1 ln 1. MAIN = S21.20411 PE- 1232A -79, SEXTON'S ADDITION arm ..;.v£. AVE x I'' -10 i PE-12 2A 9.4 AC. 0 CATALOG ;g A AVE C V AGENDA, March 30, 1982 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Tuesday, March 30, 1982 - 9 A.M. (Item #5 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N. 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME PE- 1236 -78, JANKE ADDITION ZE- 151 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO R -1 AND R -2 a. Location: Located in the Greenacres area of Spokane Valley adjacent to and south of Mission Avenue, approximately 650 feet.west of Long Road. b. Legal Description: Section 18, Township 25N, Range 45 EWM Blocks 3'and 4 of Bacon's Addition to Greenacres located in the NW 1/4 of Section 18. c. Sponsor: Wayne Janke E. 17606 Mission Avenue Greenacres, WA 99016 d. Engineer: Charles E. Simpson N. 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA 99206 e. Site Size: 9.4 acres f. Number of Lots: 19 • g. Proposed Land Use: . Single - family dwellings & duplexes h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: R -1 and R -2 j. Water Source: Consolidated Irrigation District #19 k. School District: Central Valley School District 0356 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tanks m. Environmental Impact: A proposed declaration of non- significance (a preliminary decision, which may be reversed, that an environmental impact statement, an EIS, is not needed) has been administratively issued. This insures the'applicant of a timely processing of his /her proposal at the time of the public hearing. BUT, a major purpose of the public hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the decision makers with information as whether or not a potential SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE impact upon the physical environment will result from implementation of the proposal, thus resulting in the need for an EIS. However, all "extensions of time" and most "change of conditions" are exempt from the provisions of SEPA; check with the Planning Department staff if uncertainty exists. n. Applicant is requesting a Time Extension until April 1, 1983. P8 -M PE- 1236 -78, JANKE ADDITION crw° PE 9.4 AC, R4t 4WtN 4' _. .AGENDA, March 30, 1982 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Tuesday, March 30, 1982 - 9 A.H. (Item #6 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N. 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME PE- 1366 -80, BLUE SKIES 2ND ADDITION ZE- 18 -80, AGRICULTURAL TO R -1 a. Location: Located south of and adjacent to Francis, P8 -N west and adjacent to Vincent, east of Starr Road and approximately 1600 fet. north of Rowan. b. Legal Description: Section 36, Township 26N, Range 45 EWM Tract 71 of Plat No. 2 East Farms Irri- gated Tracts as per plat thereof recorded in Volume M, page 21 of "Plats" in the office of the Spokane County Auditor: excepting therefrom the following parcels. Parcel 1: Begin at the NW corner of said Section 36; th. S 00 °21'00 "E, along the W line of the NW 1/4 of Section 36, a distance of 873.00 ft; th. N89 °39'00" a distance of 30.00 ft. to the E r/w of Starr Road and the true POB; th. continuing N 89 ° 39'00" E a distance of 370.00 ft; th. N 00 °21'00" W a distance of 235.00 ft; th. S 89 ° 39'00" W a distance of 370.00 ft. to said E line of Starr Road; th. S 00 °21'00" E a distance of 235.00 ft. to the true POB. Parcel 2: The W 170.00 ft. of the N 850.66 ft. of said Tract 71, lying N of the Otis Orchard Branch Highline Canal. c. Sponsor: Dean J. Ray 26541 Vassar Street Hemet, California 92345 d. Surveyor: David C. Clausen E. 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA 99206 e. Site Size: 56 acres f. Number of Lots: 88 g. Proposed Land Use: Single- family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed. Zoning: R -1 j. Water Source:. Consolidated Irrigation District 1/9 k. School District: East Valley School District #361 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual on -site septic tanks m. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197 -10 -530 (2) provides that: " In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." n. Applicant is requesting a Time Extension until April 1, 1983. It 247 24 1 O 4 0 7 a PE- 1366 -80, BLUE SKIES 2ND ADDITION NS I•4 2 . / : / /. • a L 4 JOS;EPFI AVE 1 � — 2'4 P.' w iY1 2 : 4 ' . .b Za° !• i 2Ei 26. ce is PEI 1366 7.8 0 =� .es'.000 rt FRANCIS VE, moot) S�hooi - 1 PALE AVE , •i au •- ROWAN AVE. /' - 6 — K••L Pl• Vi i. - ".17 L.,••••• ,il • AGENDA, March 30, 1982 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Tuesday, March 30, 1982 - 9 A.M. (OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS POSSIBLE) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N. 721 Jefferson ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS (Items 7, 8, and 9 on Morning Agenda) LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR THESE PROJECTS ARE ON FILE AND AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S OFFICE. 7. PUDE -4 -80 LIBERTY LAKE VILLAGE Extension of Time for Final Development Plan Submittal (Generally located at the southeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Liberty Lake Rd. Section 22 - 25 - 45) PROPOSED USE: Planned unit development of 94 detached single- family homes SITE SIZE: 23.5 acres APPLICANT: Liberty Lake Village, Inc. c/o F.J. Dollanty, Jr. Winston & Cashatt SeaFirst Financial Center Spokane, WA 99201 8. ZW 137 - 81 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (Generally located southeast and adjacent the City of Cheney between the Northern Pacific Railroad and the Cheney - Marshall Road. Section 7- 23 -42) PROPOSED USE: No development plans proposed at this time. SITE SIZE: 39 acres APPLICANT: Pat Whitehill and Walt Powers Route 4, Box 498 Cheney, WA 99004 9. ZN- 151 -81 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (Generally located adjacent the.City of Spokane, east of Nevada Street and south of Magnesium Road.) PROPOSED USE: No development plans proposed at this time. SITE SIZE: 40 acres APPLICANT: Hanson Properties, Inc. W. 601 Main Street, Suite 305 Spokane, WA 99201 Except when an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been prepared, a proposed declaration of non - significance (a preliminary decision, which may be reversed, that an EIS is not needed) has been administratively issued.. This ensures the applicant of a timely processing of his /her proposal at the time of the public hearing. BUT, a major purpose of the public hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the decision makers with information as to whether or not a potentially SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE impact upon the physical environment will result from implementation of the proposal, thus resulting in the need for an EIS. However, most "change of conditions" are exempt from the provisions of SEPA; check with the Planning Department staff if uncertainty exists. EC•r4fl A E EL. 2 //6. PCST • f iCE 0 cc a r a a 1 14Th AV SPRAGUE LIBERTY LAKE PUBLIC GOLF COURSE (SPOKANE: Co /v Tr) AVE 5?244UE AVE. ._ — •5 use u� C 3 a L..t d EL 2°62 0 O 0 m 2 I'll • 0 r EY VVA'Y LIBERTY c 0 "3 LAKE EL_ 2052 0.5.6.5. � � i < CLIA • 14: 4r) • Ggeriv ;24.440 Paradise Rood 0 ealam• L (1 . 0 r lde r - i r s°fi Selz Rood Bit 230 C7 ZW-13 7-81 C.1 1 HOLY CROSS i HOLIA40 AVE M AGNESIV C e [A • RIV r S ZN-i 51 0 7. a 6 luaRx{ • • t t —1 1- $.777,17 :•7 !PI' / 17 • ^.: I fi r. G P. r, c. r, V r 1 f• 4 • • r. • • • • •I. • •• •. I R p .l.A'' I • • 1. _ n- 7-1 • 1 ' a 1 7-/ _ 1000 AGENDA: MARCH 30, 1982 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY' PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Tuesday, March 30, 1982 - 1:30 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible (Item #10 on Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND RECLASSIFICATION PE- 1414 -81, RIVERWAY VILLA ZE- 92 -81, AGRICULTURAL TO R.M.H. AND COMMERCIAL PUDE -1 -82, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, an overlay zone a. LOCATION: Spokane Valley, south and adjacent the Spokane River, east and adjacent Barker Road, north and adjacent Mission Avenue, and west and adjacent Hodges Road extended. b. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 8, Township 25, Range 45. The portion of land south of the Spokane River in the west half of Section 8, T25N, R45 EWM, in Spokane County, State of Washington being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 20 feet north of the southwest corner of said Section 8 and 30 feet east of the west line of said Section, thence north 939.33 feet, thence east 370.00 feet, thence north 650.00 feet, thence west 210.00 feet, thence north 100 feet, thence east 40 feet, thence north 100 feet, thence west 200.00 feet, thence north 383.62 feet, thence east 300 feet, thence north 81 °16' east 990.56 feet, thence north 63 °49' east 685.80 feet, thence north 55 ° 52' east 772.64 feet, thence south 00 °56'58" east 1784.50 feet, thence north 89 °25' west 648.41 feet, thence south 00 °42'44" east 1303.43 feet, thence north 89±_21'46" west 1931.50 feet to the point of beginning. SPONSOR: c. SURVEYOR/ENGINEER: e. SITE SIZE: f. NUMBER OF LOTS: g. PROPOSED LAND USE: h. EXISTING ZONING: i. PROPOSED ZONING: H & E. Investments, Inc-. E. 6614 Main Spokane, WA 99206 Inland Pacific Engineering Co. E:.. 12720 Nora Avenue Spokane, WA 99216 118 acres 365 residential lots, 1 commercial Planned Unit Development for mobile and modular homes with a commercial site. Agricultural Residential Manufactured Homes with Planned Unit Development and Commercial PE- 1414 -81 RIVERWAY VILLA j. k. 1. m. n. P7 -C /b COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION:. URBAN Category Consolidated Irrigation District #19 Central Valley School Dist. #361 Community septic tanks and drainfields A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental. Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197 -10 -330 (2) provides that "...In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." An Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared for this project and circulated for public response and comments. A copy of the document is available for public inspection at the Spokane Public Library or the Spokane County Planning Department, Broadway Centre Building, North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington. WATER SOURCE: SCHOOL DISTRICT: METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: o. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The 118 -acre proposed will have one 10 -acre commercial site to serve local needs and will have 108 acres for 365 manufactured home lots (a mix of rental and owned lots). As a planned unit development, approximately 447, of the site, or 38 acres, will be common areas used as open space which will be owned and developed by a Home Owners' Association. Current development plans for the open space provide sites for pathways, trails, picnic sites, horseshoe pits, volleyball courts, tennis courts, swimming pool, outdoor shelters, recreation buildings, and visitor parking, as well as mini storage for the residences of the proposal. The proposal is to be developed in phases over approximately 8 years. - PE- 1414 -81 RIVERWAY VILLA P7 -C /b PE-1S14 -81 ZE-9Z 81 PUDE•1-82 118 ACRES P7 -Z /b AGENDA March 31, 1982 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME• Wednesday, March 31, 1982 - 9 A.M. PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington 9 A.M. PRELIMINARY PLAT AND ZONE CHANGE - Continuation of December 18, 1981 Item 1. PS- 1418 -81, ANDERBERG AIRPARK ZS- 131 -81, Agricultural to Local Business and /or Commercial PODS -2 -82, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, an overlay zone Paradise Suburban Properties....Page 1 A continuation of the preliminary plat hearing of December 18, 1981, to consider an "Alternate Plan ". AGENDA, March 31, 1982 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 .SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: PLACE: PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - - -- ALTERNATE PLAN (A continuation of December 18, 1981, Hearing to consider an Alternate Plan) PS- 1418 -81, ANDERBERG AIRPARE ZS- 131 -81, AGRICULTURAL TO LOCAL BUSINESS AND /OR COMMERCIAL PUDS -2 -82, A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, an overlay zone a.. Location: The proposal is located between Spokane and Spangle. The site is bounded on the•west by Highway 195 and on the north by the eastward extension of Paradise Road and Stentz Road. The south boundary is approximately 100 feet north of the eastward extension of Stutler Road. b. Legal Description: (SEE ATTACHED PAGE FOR FULL LEGAL DESCRIPTION). c. Sponsor: Paradise Suburban Properties, Inc. 414 Whitmar Street, Box 154 Rosalia, WA 99170 d. Surveyor & Engineer.: Western Consultants, Inc. 1210 Harrison, Box 8476 Moscow, Idaho 83843 e Gross Site Size:. 559 acres f. Proposed Land'Use: 89 Single - Family Residences, 2 Local Business, 1 common tie down, 1 airstrip, 6 open -space lots, and 1 well site g.. Existing Zoning: Agricultural, with an approved Conditional .Use-Permit for a runway (Chapter 4.24.130 Zoning Ordinance) h. Proposed Zoning: Local Business for Lot 1 and 1A, Block 11. i. Water Source: Private water source for proposal j. School District: Liberty School District #362 k. Method of Sewage-Disposal: Individual onsite septic tanks with ' community aerated lagoon. 1. Environmental Impact: Per the procedures set forth in • WAC'197 =10 660(3) the previously prepared EIS for ANDERBERG AIRFARE, October, 1979,. and the additional environmental information are adequate for the environmental review. The Alternate Plan does not represent any substantial change that would affect the impact on the environment different than those already addressed by the previously prepared EIS and EIS Supplemental information. m. The Hearing Examiner Committee on December 18, 1981, referred the proposal back to the sponsor to work with County Planning staff to develop an alternate plan which adequately recognizes the guidelines of the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan. This public hearing will be conducted as a "continuation" of the December 18, 1981, hearing. The same Hearing Examiners Committee members are being requested to hear the alternate plan as heard the December 18, 1981, proposal to minimize the need to repeat testimony already given. P8 -I Wednesday, March 31, 1982 - 9 A.M. Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N. 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA PS- 1418 -81, ANDERBERG AIRPARK LEGAL DESCRIPTION A parcel of land consisting of portions of the South half of the Northwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of Section 4; the Southeast Quarter of Section 5;. the Northeast Quarter and the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 8; the North half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9 all being in Township 23 North, Range 43 East, W.M., and More particularly described as follows: Beginning at the East Quarter corner of said Section 6; Thence North 89 °05'02" West along the East -West centerline of Section 8 a distance of 2037.86 feet to a point on the Easterly right - of -way line of Chandelle Drive West; Thence South 0 °54'58" West along said right -of -way line a distance of 20.07 feet to a point of curvature; Thence around a curve to the right, an arc distance of 152.03 feet (Radius = 430.0 feet, Tangent = 76.82 feet) to a point of tangency: Thence South 21 °10'2 West a distance of 57.74 feet to a point on the Southerly right -of- way line of Stutler Road; Thence North 68 °49'36" West along said Southerly right -of -way line a distance of 202:59 feet to a point of curvature; Thence around a curve to the left an arc distance of 133.99 feet (Radius = 370.0 feet, Tangent = 67.74 feet) to a point of tangency; Thence North 89 °34'32" West a distance of 69.08 feet to a point on the Easterly right -of -way line of Washington State Route. 195 (formerly Primary State Iiighway No. 3); Thence North 0 °25:28" East along said Easterly right of -way line a distance of257.80 feet to a point; Thence along said Easterly right -of -way line North 1 ° 07'58" East 2126.27 feet; Thence South 89 °08'07" East 585.00 feet; PS- 1418 -81, ANOERBERG AIRPARK LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Continued) Thence North 01 °07'58" West 390.00 feet; Thence North 89 ° 08'07" West 585.00 feet; .Thence continue along said Easterly right-of-way North 01 °07'58" East 1793.23 feet; Thence North 03 °07'58" East 199.99 feet; Thence North 12 °33'58" East 726.1.2 Ceet to the intersection with the East - West centerline of Section 5, Township 23 North, -Range 43 East, W.M.; Thence along said East -West centerline South 88 °16'20 "East 2366:24 feet to the East Quarter corner of said Section 5, and the West Quarter corner of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range. 43 East, W.M.; Thence South 01 °18'37" West 2668.51 feet to the Southeast Corner of said Section 5; Thence South 01 °48'33" West 2645.93 feet along the East line of Section 8, Township 23 North, Range 43 East, W.M., to the True Point of Beginning. ALSO the North half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 43 East, W.M.; 'And the following described land lying in ihe South half of the Northwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 43 East, W.M.; The Southwest Quarter and that part of the South half of the Northwest Quarter lying South of Steptz County Road, .EXCEPT THAT portion of the.South half of the Northwest Quarter described as follows: Beginning at a point 2202.63 feet South of the Northwest .corner of Section and True Point of Beginning; Thence North 78 °52'59" East 250.50 feet; Thence North 19 °12'59" East 155.63 feet to the South line of Stentz Road; • Thence Northwesterly along said South line to the West line of Section;. Thence South along the West Section line to Point of Beginning. All in Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 43 East, W.M., in Spokane County, Washington. • fee Marshall PS- 1418 -81, ANDERBERG "AIRPARK 9 ?billet) Lake Taylor Whit• PS- 1418 -81 'SPANGLE 3 Pd U S o an al°. 0 Hwy AC. 5S8 VICINITY MAP tr t ^ P - 5:•.• (0 - 0 C_S t,) Le D ck M ti,Ses Q& _ ._c_. _ _ - - • - o . Ato • _ p&sU I 1:±( ;:vt. p kA- ‘til — AC' a ea\ MAC•Cf` k),4;\, • t . t.L...3174 is . e_c, C__ek•S S . X ChA D A — /Yv‘. q...01-••••••••-.S N, c k.„,..us„..) — caL.ek s s+J,5 r od o WiN • ' • • . 14, ‘-` my; ks_ (ct cck—• ; St& 0 0 a /C, a AI CIA 71nrs--ex-3 r/ 4' j7 chi\ it )4 A If , 4\ _ /_At • • 6 54 tit / �e_fw_e. e - ,.gip- ryvo. j_, -' 4041 e - S .. cif coif r s Ae- 5_1t{/y n1 ii g)OvN_ SA'N,_ .A_' CC O S'S K-� r O-w. V kids Ain /1' 4 24,2o -_m c C (9 kef w6ALdw;/..) - I" e 42 -,1_ o q .v_�_— 34R 1 • CU hehinO co`i erc..4 et_ ch. s f L OG- (A-1 In.sirtesS hU / I 0 - ; ' - S7 °R4C ,E /t a o $.8A Icko R. e /` 56,0,,o ,_cs - 4 4-6o Ab-J C_ / hie r . / / /qoZ /o /7 n q om e i / �i e deas ai e o - . / / //)1 oc J A e caj �idewe" . s,4 T1 o{ , 1 c/s ; 1/2'0 ie Q. ; S 171A( (,Jb.ere ,.s JJoo I TA f, ) EN., fj e - r. s A lI • - _ . L 10 L.J • R 44 0Ae CAN Xee wP de.V_e_14922 to -__ - Cc) (A " 46 7110 CoAv.) N /_3O&. a Q 4 ,S PAUee i o S. W CoRner _ -- AR_k.Cr__ -. 17l� s5:0. PAR 4— i/ ems_--lo w ' C6 "Ay _ _ b_a_c1—_ L R-e _ ? w GI( • cazytir � _ � tr&I,\ kr r d 1JW _R J N n . • •s.r E A6o, r 1.., ode „e_ok .50, _ a.S ___ _ __ II C�P A�Ie� LL s �77/e j M(SO ,hm,+A a. k 0)44+ �0 7” con.ccemS — «; l( .c_UK / _V- - - - Lr Y c3OJ pRiok - 0 Hyigi_to4i -971 I e Ga_, ` .+P 0.(." e r I_0 ASGm �. re r 41180W € ft . a _ �_v_e I • Se_e,K. � , r, tv. � ; es NAd -le_r — Z105 Js4.4 c — ,N/Le�er / sQ ! mk k e 176k- ov.. c1 , . of,.s ljeffer I�_o.�., - ` ham J ood'— �'�?,��sk cfaed_ Ames 0. e o, CLo / n..e /154 8AR& -t /Ad 152 fe �s � 1 . 0 Fog ¢eve1 / — 40 r 360 119, : L_Lpt r cklAkiC %IS »O 'Ado To // 4 , /let ose -C/ On- aeve,l LL r � / 5-/ air o_,� — ,3/944 k_eJS De -c-d4-ay f " Ao 1281:6 i r�_�0� -_� o c�ce J /`� D eep C e_eek_ � 4ocil-e&) .. est 1 '7 r7 o f J C ( = _ 7 _ . c�d.� i -f nref J([ 6 a (. ?ice_ ��e n nns ,,e/ • _Me ihrptimi efatier4 I tpl e/f_e20 .ciffia 777;:p 'moo evi t Pia.±5 _ _reAL4.11 -7 ‘, - .r.r _Je / deekir/e, . ektt a 1 _ aced_04e . 71 Ce4)--/"Maltke________ _ _ (0_ .S)!7iea ----> &hdt____, 6-.J b eLeaczpe-Z .• .b.,(42______Bierefig.-4_4;i2re i. cie--&-c4 "Z • 3 filetdee Lecas ti —I • go 1 &rdes e--/ /Oh adiet) Ai° V dal , zelertaL-:, ade..,,, m ------..4.;-- 7/ .2- 2 e' --:-; :-r-- Cr 4 a -"d _ _ t ,.. - - _., 4 72 cheten-- r9f5 77421,)—a c,...---- , .7, ,e 12-;647-4- Cie-ke ea 77 .-e--f- ./44in Le:VC ;1--- Wt.-Ca fi ( Zliern-,eyfreycid.t Az, _ _Asera • . 1 _ .c 1 -474-a-7 - •5_cil tic 1_5 ack).....r5,9 s/ /az- t At : firr t " Pe4 4- i is didfr'- I i 6 A A 11 rh 3 •5_cil tic 1_5 ack).....r5,9 s/ /az- OFFICEOF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUN Y, WASHING ON /mac /4 TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM; COUNTY ENGINEERS DEPARTMENT U fit SUBJECT ROAD CONDIT ONS` FOR PLAT NAM R ; oe rWgyy U% /!a- NUMBER �E /d /y * CONDITIONS LIRCLED APPLY TO PLAT U NDER CONSIDERATION 6 71)-that conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer Is given subject to dedication of Right -of -Way and approval of the road system as Indicated In the ' preliminary plat of record. that plans, profiles, and 'cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. that drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage. 1 ' facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. that the regulations of the National Flood 'Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat Is affected by a•Flood Hazard Zone. - construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate In writing that all improve- ' ments were Installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced; -no construction work Is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way until a permit has been Issued by the County Engineer. All work Is subject.'to Inspection and approval by the County Engineer; all construction within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way Is to be com- pleted prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of Improvements, construction certifica- tion, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer; E 8 -no direct access from lots to 1/2 Right of Ways until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads; no direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed to County Standards and establ lshed as County Roads; road design, construction, and drainage control for 1/2 Right of Ways and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the Developer; - T. that appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held In trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1 ft. strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Tem- porary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) a statement must appear In the dedicatory language of the plat that Individual drive- way access permits be required prior to Issuance of.a permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. dedication of /5f1.addltional Right of Way along 84,eke /z ewe/ /o J /.additional Right of Way along /// /5S /OA/ /1✓e additional Right of Way along a statement shall be placed In plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to QIAcKev t?oP't 02 M\S5:o.a Ave • E15 - that a statement be placed In the plat dedlcatlon for future slope ease- ments as required by Spokane County along - existing County roads providing direct access to the plot shall be paved and /or curbed to Spokane County standards. that all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed t� Spokane County standords. that sidewalks are required along the arterial(s) on ijg e aq r(�/ JJ � _13iaN .Qy� Public Road Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section (1) Suction Number Z. For 7Ucki&N,1/4.4.,_. Minimum Paving width C'dldeeto>=5 ^ (2) Section Number �_ For4_ pp m& Minimum Paving width £ccesc ST/{,. (3) Section Number For Minimum Paving width (4) Section Number For Minimum Paving width Ik• rienka•ir rowIry Ot4joC IQQ1 aJal 5taw/d4/tq/ I//lp rn'/e S to p &ghee Ro p4 - (3, 4 RIP CO alit t*k i S,. RoAdwiktfr saisW NO- l s6«d4Ry kite-4 L‘,..1, St tad, fckcl∎; A. v 1 a C'oMh Tv ' .b /r /e — S Ala W • f.lterole re %jl, ss le) .v AS /7 e• E20 -the word "applicant" shall Include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs,( assigns, and successors. E21 -to construct the road improvements stated heroin, the applicant may, with the approv al of the County Engineer, Join in and be a willing participant In any petition or'• ' resolution which purposes is the formation of a Road Improvement Dlstrlct (RID) tor' said Improvements pursuant to RCM 36.88, as amended. At such time as an RID Is created or any Road Improvement Project Is sanctioned by Spokane County,' the' Improve cents required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and •�' assigns.' E22 -as an alternative method of constructing the road Improvement stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road Improve- ments stated herein by Joining and participating In a County Road protect (CRP) to the extent of the required road Improvement. At such time as an RID is created or, any Road Improvement Project Is sanctioned by Spokane County, the Improvements re- qulred (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. E23 -that the following statement be placed In the plat dedication: The owners, their heirs, grantees and assigns, agree to join In the formation of a County Road ' Improvement Dlstrlct pursuant to R.C.M. 36.88 at such time as a Road improvement District Is created or any Road Improvement Protect Is sanctioned by Spokane -County.. The Improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving) will be at the sole expense of the owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. E24 -that the sponsor shall prepare and submit tc the County Engineer a design proposal acceptable to'tho State Highway Department of the proposed- State Highway - County Road Intersection. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State. Highway are to be the responsibility of the Sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond' to cover the cost of such Improvements furnished to the County Engineer In'the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. : 'E25- the - proposed private road(s) as shown on the preliminary plat serving • 'lots with: . no extension possible; extension to serve 8 or less lots; _future public, Right of Way tract Is approved by the County Engineer. r • E26 -that private' road(s) be Improved to Spokane County standard for a private road standard serving lots. Subject to approval under. section 10.207 of the Spokane County Fire Code. _ • E27 -that the following provision be made that the following described property be held In trust until the continuation of the private road and the "Tract X" Is deeded �r dedi- cated: a I ft. strip at the ends or edges of all private "Tract X" that terminate or border the plat boundary. — E28 -a 'statement shall be placed In the plat dedication that the "Tract X" private road(s) contained within this plat Is /are for the use of parcels within the plat until such time as the roadway Is Improved and established as a public road. E29 -that the following statement be placed In the plat dedication: ' WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, Improve, maintain,. or other- wise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the-property described in this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be Issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no.. obligation tor said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County ' has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, • construct, alter, repair, Improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement Is and shall run with the land'and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns Including the obligation to parti- cipate In the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. the proposed plat shall be Improved to the standards set forth In Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, .•s amended, which establishes regula trons for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees in new construction. RIVERWAY VILLA PE 1414 Because of the traffic impacts of this development proposal upon the existing County Road System, it shall be the responsibility of the Developer to provide necessary right -of -way and improve Barker Road from Mission Avenue northward to the river. That improvements to Mission Avenue and Barker Road shall be a requirement of the zone change for Lot 1 Block 1 and the issuance of a building permit on that parcel. Improvements to Mission Avenue from the Easterly line of Lot 1 Block 1 to the Easter - ly plat boundary will be required as that phase of the project is developed either as a zone change or finalized as a plat. The Washington State Department of Transportation has responded to the Environmental Impact Statement by stating that the additional traffic generated by this proposal will "cause a severe impact on the Barker Road -I -90 Interchange." Should it become severely impacted the WSDOT would "Look to Spokane County to share in the cost of modifying the structure and /or ramps to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposal." The applicant has indicated that the proposed subdivision /PUD will be phased over an eight -year period with eight or nine phases. A traffic analysis of each phase will be required of the developer and reviewed by Spokane County prior to plat finaliza- tion. This analysis will be coordinated with the State of Washington Department of Transportation. If the WSDOT determines that'a phase will adversely impact the 1 -90 facility and Spokane County is required to participate in the improvement of the Barker Road interchange, Spokane County will require that the plat sponsors pay a proportionate share of the improvements based upon the traffic generated from this proposal. Traffic analysis for each phase will also serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Should the anal- ysis determine a need for intersection upgrading, the developer will be assessed a • proportionate share for the required improvements. -` OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON /llgi J6 , 19 &Z. TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM COUNTY ENGINEER'S DEPARTMENT cif* SUBJECT ROAD CONDITIONS FOR PLAT NAtIE R orr4,n 111Un- NUMBER _4 iv " * CONDITIONS CIRCLED APPLY TO PLAT UNDERTOt !DERATION that conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer Is given subject to dedlcatlon of Right -of -Way and approval of the road system as indicated In the preliminary plat of record. that plans, profiles, and cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Protesslonal Civil Engineer. that drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. that the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat Is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed englneer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate In writing that all improve- ments were Installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced; no construction work Is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way until a permit has been Issued by the County Engineer. All work Is subject to Inspection and approval by the County Engineer; all construction within the existing or proposed Publ lc'Rlght of Way Is to be com- pleted prior to filing the final plat or a bond In the amount estimated by the County Eng1neer'to cover the cost of construction of Improvements, construction certifica- tion, "As Built" plans, and monumonting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer; E 8 -no direct access from lots to 1/2 Right of Ways until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads; 6 4 11-no direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructeu to County Standards and established as County Roads; road design, construction, and drainage control for 1/2 Right of Ways and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the Developer; that appropriate provision ,be made that the following described property be held In trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1 tt. strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Tem- porary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) a statement must appear In the dedicatory language of the plat that Individual drive- way access permits be required prior to Issuance of a building permit for.drlveway approaches to the County road, system. dedlcatlon of /5 P/'.addltional Right of Way along 8g4eke,e £eve/ /of/additional Right of Way along ,W /5Si0..✓ igve additional Right of Way along a statement shall be placed In plat dedlcatlon that no direct access be allowed from lots to 2Rr`ter p2 \\)5.o& /4s6 E15 -that a statement be placed In the plat dedlcatlon providing for future slope ease- ments as required by Spokane County along • existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall bo paved and /or curbed to Spokane County standards. hat all public roads within the plat be designed .,nd constructed to Spokane County standards. that sidewalks are required along the arterinl(s) un jHKi.g_ecagd /i SSi o,V /fy� (over assigns, and successors. ' t Public Rudd Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section (I) Section Number _2_ For rr((i(IZAAL __ Minimum Paving width CO(IecTof Std. (2) Section Number i For 4 v_p c. j 4 _ Minimum Paving width tc.ccnT S7d. (3) Section Number _ _ For _ Minimum Paving width (4) Section Number For Minimum Paving width E20 -the word "applicant" shall Include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, E21 -to construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approv- al of the County Engineer, join In and be a willing participant In any petition or • resolution which purposes Is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvements pursuant to RCM 36.88, as amended. At such time as an RID Is created or any Road improvement Protect is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improve- ments required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. E22 -as an alternative method of constructing the road Improvement stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road Improve- ments stated herein by joining and participating In a County Road protect (CRP) to the extent of the required road Improvement. At such time as an RID Is created or any,Road Improvement Protect Is sanctioned by Spokane County, the Improvements created qulred (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. E23 -that the following statement be placed In the plat dedlcatlon: The owners, their heirs, grantees and assigns, agree to Join In the formation of a County Road Improvement District pursuant to R.C.N. 36.88 at such time as a Road Improvement 'District Is created or any Road Improvement Project Is sanctioned by Spokane County. The improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving) will be at the sole expense of the owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. E24 -that the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal acceptable to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway- County Road Intersection. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the responsibility of the Sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such Improvements furnished to the County Engineer In the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. E25 -the proposed private road(s) as shown on the preliminary plat serving lots with: no extension possible; extension to serve 8 or less lots; future public Right of Way tract is approved by the County Engineer. E26 -that private road(s) be improved to Spokane County standard for a private road standard serving lots. Subject to approval under section 10.207 of the Spokane County Flre Code. E27 -that the following provision be made that the following described property held In trust until the continuation of the private road and the "Tract X" Is deeded or dedi- cated: a 1 ft. strip at the ends or edges of ail private "Tract X" that terminate or border the plat boundary. E28 -a statement shall be placed In the plat dedication that the "Tract X" private road(s) contained within this plat Is /are for the sole use of parcels within the plat until such time as the roadway Is Improved and established as a public road. E29 -that the following statement be placed In the plat dedlcatlon: WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, Improve, maintain, or other- wise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the proper,t_y described In this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be Issued on property on a pr i vate road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, Improve, maintain, pr.•vldo drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement Is and shall run with the land'and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns including the obligation' to partl- cipate'In the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. t hu proposed plat shall be Improved to the standards set forth In Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 - 1592, AS amended, which establishes regula- tions for roads, approaches, drainage, and tees In new construction. h. SQo%4.A a (oai.iry Armioe Alai ( Sta.- AI:ted inlpro1irrnew to 8n kee Rop 4 • .21,_ctor. &N.M. C ufw .�.c o AClu &t, se c - [,bony Ate. 1 S'o cori c�N2� tw -c-4 tea 5to sad 11 fs.cl.. r) p Co 4/iynT,'ast 6/cyc/e — show St .cffre. _ 111/ 5•.04' Avenue, RIVERWAY VILLA PE 1414 Because of the traffic imparts of this development proposal upon the existing County Road System, it shall be the responsibility of the Developer to provide necessary right -of -way and improve Barker Road from Mission Avenue northward to the river. That improvements to Mission Avenue and Barker Road shall be a requirement of the zone change for Lot 1 Block 1 and the issuance of a building permit on that parcel. Improvements to Mission Avenue from the Easterly line of Lot 1 Block 1 to the Easter- ly plat boundary will be required as that phase of the project is developed either as a zone change or finalized as a plat. The Washington State Department of Transportation has responded to the Environmental Impact Statement by stating that the additional traffic generated by this proposal will "cause a severe impact on the Barker Road -I -90 Interchange." Should it become severely impacted the WSDOT would "Look to Spokane County to share in the cost of modifying the structure and /or ramps to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposal." The applicant has indicated that the proposed subdivision /PUD will be phased over an eight -year period with eight or nine phases. A traffic analysis of each phase will be required of the developer and reviewed by Spokane County prior to plat finaliza- tion. This analysis will be coordinated with the State of Washington Department of Transportation. If the WSDOT determines that a phase will adversely impact the 1 -90 facility and Spokane County is required to participate in the improvement of the Barker Road interchange, Spokane County will require that the plat sponsors pay a proportionate share of the improvements based upon the traffic generated from this proposal. Traffic analysis for each phase will also serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Should the anal- ysis determine a need for intersection upgrading, the developer will be assessed a proportionate share for the required improvements. A. • ro Q>, , 43._co.\a�av4s 5 \Ake � . krNt/wi c h e_ jay e-( c vs E32 Because of the traffic impacts of this development proposal upon the existing County Road System, it shall be the responsibility of the Developer to provide necessary right -of -way and improve Barker Road from Mission Avenue northward to the river. E34 The Washington State Department of Transportation has responded to the Environmental Impact Statement by stating that the additional traffic generated by this proposal will "cause a severe Impact on the Barker Road -I -90 Interchange." Should it become severely Impacted the WSDOT would "Look to Spokane County to share in the cost of modifying the structure and /or ramps to accommodate additional traffic generated by this proposal." RIVERWAY VILLA PE 1414 E33 Improvements to Mission Avenue from the Easterly line of Lot 1 Block 1 to the Easter- ly plat boundary will be required as that phase of the protect is developed either as a zone change or finalized as a plat. The applicant has indicated that the proposed subdivision /PUD will be phased over an eight -year period with eight or nine phases. A traffic analysis of each phase will be required of the developer and reviewed by Spokane County prior to plat finaliza- tion. This analysis will be coordinated with the State of Washington Department of Transportation. If the WSDOT determines that a phase will adversely Impact the 1 -90 facility and Spokane County is required to participate in the improvement`of the Barker Road interchange, Spokane County will require that the plat sponsors pay a share of the improvements based upon the proportionate traffic generated from this proposal. Traffic analysis for each phase will also serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Should the anal- ysis determine a need for intersection upgrading, the developer will be assessed a proportionate share for the required improvements. E35 That Improvements to Mission Avenue and Barker Road adjacent to Lot 1 Block I shall be a requirement of the zone change and improvements will be constructed prior to the issuance of a building permit on that parcel. I / / i t.G. That on Sta� highway,rela ed improvements, qhe Stat%may requir _ to /pa in the cost5of the iipproveme is on a asis of affi volume. In the event future public agency funds are not available to construct improvements needed to mitigate traffic impacts created by particular phases of the project, the Sponsor must provide adequate assurances to guarantee the implementation of the needed improvements or delay the development of the particular phases in question until either private or public funds do become available to construct the needed improvements. E X H I B I T A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) Page»3 * *• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. *.* *;* * Part IV - To be completed by County Engineers Office County Engineers Office requirements for preliminary plats -n4+) been satisfied subject to submission and approval of calculations and drainage plan. Signature' Signa`�ure and SL /4S0'E c r TO * * * * * *. * * . * * • Part V,- To be completed by County Utilities Dept. County Utilities Department requirements for preliminary plat have ,. ) been satisfied. Signature * *.* * * * * *• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *•* Planning Department Information Date Submitted: Title Signature and Title Date Accepted: !Ve ` 2 37 Plat•File rlo:.. FE-pi I "S/ Plat f')VEI wAy j{ PaA 3 5 Number.ohLots: . .;Loc,ation:?`7'.Sec. 0 T R 7ls .School District: 9 /Ii Date ORlCT /NAL (l, DA) PRELIM/n. /ARK Con/Sc/L.TAT /b!V.9 C/-F4 * * * * * * * * * * - * * . * * * * * * * * * * * *•.* * .* Y. ,/ /_ ( Date This part to be completed by Planning Department Cn 'tiG 6 f Hearing Date: gC J 4511V, = p'2)VE - ) -5 2 Preliminary Plat Fee: Checklist Fee: pp/ Zone Change File No: A Date Established:. 1 957 , • Existing Zoning: Advertised Zone C,hec.ked.by: Change: v'y A/ / _ -- . ry _ z J•..n t M4 1. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM .;, SIGNATURE BLOCKS (ON PAGES 2 AND 3) MUST BE FILLED IN, IF APPROPRIATE, BEFORE,RETURNING , f ,. it TO THE PLAT ADMINISTRATOR., Part I - To be completed by applicant and surveyor '`' AREA AND DISTANCE************#***#****** *• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * ** .Total,,,amount of land in this Subdivision:. 118 .' ` density of'the Plat: 3.08 gross i'i ',;,;,Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: ?...Proposes Use of controlled adjoining land: N/A 47What is the driving distance in miles to the nearest fire station? 3 Miles - .1UShopping facilities? 3 Miles - Municipal Boundary:.. 9 Miles t Paved street ,.or v -.4- ; ,7 1.1(471 , " if- highway Adjoining ? :.,. 4 , { ,.LAND USE{ ***** * ***** ** #i ** * * * * * * * * ** 'n ` . r Comprehensive Plan Category: u;rt > Indicate''the -proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings (365). w -: Du lexes ( ). Indicate lots for ,duplexes: .. « 3 Multi- family dwelling units ( ). Indicate which lots: :: g Mobile Homes (365). Other ( ). Describe other uses: 'j4:Describe any non - residential use proposed in the Plat: 10 Acre Commercial Site located C' The S'W Cnrner Of Plat =:What is the present use of. the property proposed to be platted? Agricultural `r,jList type of uses: Cultivated land: 100 t acres. Pasture: acres. y ,Timber: acres. <'Vacant: 12 t acres. Other: .4Is keeping of animals desired? No ( X ). Yes ( ). Type: )•',.:lu,Proposed Zoning: RMH with P.U.D. and Commercial on Lot 1, Block 1 1 you plan to file the Plat in its entirety {- 'r lopment? The nrniert will be phased 4 4;‘,--• ^`'T° what level of improvement will streets be ,p4 Curb and Gravel ( ). Curb and Paved ( X ) .Describe of above: ' t Indicate'method of extending service to the lots '(Dwellings):.. Underground utility easements ( X ). Overhead utility easements ( Utilities-in streets ( X ). No easements.( ). EXHIBIT B Acres :' Total Number of•Lots' '365' Lots /Gross•Acre ?.Acres None • Acre as proposed, or will it be .a multi -phase deve - constructed? Gravel (E ) . Minimum, Paved only ( • ). . ;'`.What is the time period expected for complete development of the Plat: 10'vears �;,F�Street improvements completed? 10 vears• Substantial number of lots occupied? 80% :4 Is dedication of any land for public use contempleted? (Parks, schools, etc.) .No. (X,.). Yes ( • ). Describe: ,:n e' the size of units proposed to be constructed: 1 050 - 1.800 00 ".•;?s .Number.of Bedrooms 2 - 3 . • Estimated Sale Price $35,000. - 60,000. ° :Will buildings,be built on the-lots before they are sold: No (X ). Yes (X ). • 'j Will any special deed restrictions be included in the sale of lots? .No ( ). Yes ( 'd+If "yes", explain: Covenants UT * * * ** * * ** * ** * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank ( X'). Lagoon ( -). , sTreatment.plant :.).'.Other, or combinations (Describe) Community Septic Tank R flrainfield car r,• • • Indicate proposed''source of. water supply: Individual.welis'( = ')•'_Public ; systieiu'(:'.X4'.) "Private community system ( )• �. S are feet • On Site "` Ad Adjoining 'ijndicate` the distance from this proposal to the nearest existing water main' J 9 {feet, '' ...�,.._ s size -of nearest main: 6" - 21" inches. [UTILITIES - ( Continued)** * *t * * ** * ********Rk f Mtw* ** ***MYrtt Rtlf iYK***** f ►4 *9Mi >hiii*Wi a.i A.. e stList utility companies or districts expected to provide service to this Plat: WWP 489 -0500 ' , Gas: WWP ti Water: CID # 19 Phone:CID # 19 924 -3655 • i4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ssaa.W* * * ***f wrx +rrasrs.. +a «.s*rrw * +w. t PROPOSED PLAT NAME: • I, the undersigned, have completed the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat has ` , ;!been pre$ared by me under my supervision in accordance with the requirements, of the:Spokane : �;Count . cC'1y oltanntAgyDepartment.and the laws of the State of Wa ngtin. 4i . t, - Md� '.?4.�} ' P Ito" ��. .°e ' ..F•' i} • s; i `•••• e ' 0 YhIP t;S. ° ° t • ( {Si ed),. /.�. 7 ,1/ / - ' x' 1H : p *. . - ,� o E f' < Date : q / 9 • ' 175 ? / . • y f,�- :•i. (Address) W. 1675 Fourth Phone:. 624 -8420. •fj tV w h ta ENG .. r; , ' :- - „SUR S•F,C, : ' '-, I, the undersigned, 'swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are'.' • '- 'r'made truthfully and to the best of my- knowledge. I further swear that I AM THE OWNER OF 4 RECORD of the s;.te proposed as the preliminary plat, or, if not the owner, attached here -.'j' u , .with is written permission from said owner authorizing my actions on his or her behalf. I also understand, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack or full 'i.' • . on my part, Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of non significance + it might issue in reliance upon "' - checklist.. } . �K t ' (Signed) , v/ I _ _ A Date: l /f/ 664M.'n okane Washington / µy EA NOTARY SLa_ j •.44 tt� r, • 11 t ■ *yr*.wrawsirrnr•y ra rrws *****M.rs•v*** ** ********ss**rrt+.s**** * *w.rs *rs *♦i*.rr.s••s +/* +****** • J •� y 1 • < , . '.�, NOTARY s E X H I B I T A PRELIMINARY. PLAT. APPLICATION FORM (Continued) ‘4A.,!'. This sub ; sion (is not) situated within our service area. 4B:Thi abler and able (not ableand wil domesti (fire) industrial r: Satisfactory arrange have Signature (only when items C S-O 19 - purveyors name . Riverway Villa (Address) • Spokane, Washington Zip: 99204 'Part II.- to be completed by water purveyor to supply this subdivision with adequate water for.. commercial uses..,/Ffs. - fa 04 nl�. ,, .cVI°Ws I64 (have not been otade s This p3oposal.s set by ri.e'D�s� B & C are true and completed) 0 0144gel o). P-440E See.- signature and title •** * *** * } * *****f* ** • i* **** * ** * ******* ** *a* ***s*a* ***1*** . ' Part III -to be completed by Health District , Lip f ` - • ;Health District staff has^completed a field investigation of the site. • 'istrict. requirements for preliminary plats have ,, et 4 . C iltsr, r a e and tit f ts•s.as•a.rrr * * *** **** * *** ****.* * ****** * Phone: 534 -2657 Zip: 99206 • Stir/ Stir/ 1 Date: • s ._ 9 /17 date ■* *** 1 *** cR ; Card �ra ri� k, C N. t oe m Eck, 5 - 1 3 _ -- PL k± LOA P +„_A kk P h e �aR / A *tes `�/�e, e-{0A —h .R, 0,\,/V Ex A o le_ -- (ig 0440 — — C/O 1 le): Aca_ d - 3 i % 7 - 3 v ■ t A. Project Name: IS/vewAq Win PROPOSAL Number of Parcels: 398/ Section 8 T. 25 N., R. yS E.W.M.; Quarter 1 2 04 DEVELOPER Name: D I'D or Address: 4 3 PAc ;f ; r AGENT Phone: Business qc - - SW/ Home Name: Mr OWNER Address: Paes4,647 ,e 5TA77 o i1J Phone: Business ENGINEER Remarks: C. INSPECTION Date: / / By: Remarks: D. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: E. FINAL PLAT CHECKS S P O K A N E C O U N T Y E N G I N E E R - - -PREL IM I NARY CONSULTATION - -- Preliminary a) Right -of -Way 1 S -Ft. 3AQkez Conditions b) Curb cS c) Sidewalk A QTer7in15 d) Pave A %' 'e.AdS e) Approaches H e5 f) Drainage g) State /City Review 1 Yes ( ) e PO. 8( Home Number il / 972// Name: CEKTu2 WE Address: ,y,p/p //)A Sly/ 41 r.A; Star A Phone: Business 3 u _ 15, 7 Home B. PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION: Date: (¢ / 30 / 8'/ By: I O kt • %Ice No (r" 041 "KV 2/, ,v. 7`3 c %I r - 7z, 4 ) / o ye a . i i • - oneXT • f3 . keo ,t4.44 N ss. o n, NOTE: This proposal must comply with Spokane County Regulations for Roads, Ap- p roach and Drainage in New Construction; Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80- 592 as amended. Conditions are preliminary and may change after field in- spection and review of County records. PD 0 DIVERSIFIED PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED JIM JOHNSON PRINCIPAL b Fee Paid: Yes X No Amount $2/70 °/ Cash Check # / ° Z Planning Application Signed: Date / / By: 71/ rl TEL: 1- (509) 455 -5141 E. 302 PACIFIC SPOKANE, WA 99202 RECEIPT cc, to .,5 3G 19 _ a L Received From_ _C _...`���j -- - 1 -) C_ rJ.CUlc 1 tel 1U I ,120__ J L • 4:•• . 4 ‘7,..,.!..4c. • „ • .1:)..;;To tel. amount of land fl this. 124 . Acr 'total 4,1ilmbely • `, • • 41 *** *t • 7 7. • "" "1 • C 4e*" Iriiike fi Proposed' iienSitY, Of the: Plat': / F. y Aorth - - - 7 2 .; .-Adt911/4aMount •adjOini:a land Controlled k bY" - this driner. or: :sp : • c 4 CF. .rt • • 1 • • • • • EXHIB 7 eB • • , • . ' - . ."/ -- APPL ICATION •• FORM ,...: •: - :st '-; ri ,,...:: .,- 4 , . tr . it:s ••• S .r 4-.44;1' r 41 -. :... ; . 'Z: 1 i :''‘ . • • - • • . ...•;' .•'• '•• • .• • I IF IF APPROPRIATE; BEFORE RhT.S'UT • ' • . •• ' • . ‘) fir •••• ' 'r". 71? . • • : . -• " •• 1 -•• •-% re; tNe Ti cr 1 * .91-13 r ,,,, :.41,ermATtrgt . BLOCKS (ON ON PAGS 2 ` ' D : EiND : .-.."- ,. • -,- •• - ... ,.:,. :,..,,......,•,„/ ..... , ,.p,4,,, ,,, ,::: ,., , ) ,, ,.2.4,4 , ;:e ,,.i.>„i.61 , ,.,, ..., ), MUST BE :PILLED , . , - • - • - • - rrr.,....• r - 4 -' 1,„•.; ., 1, •tlYliet l ikiT±ADMTITISTRAT " 913 • . 4; . ' . ' '.14„ • 1 . , , :'' -... ' : ;„, ,4 ,,::::4,: c :, , ; .. -,-.:,;',;,....... • ,• - 4.4.„"q,"".^.K . I,4- , ...,,..,. 4 r- ..:,,-, ,.c` :i .4 : -‘ ' • '''' c ' . ' • .. ' r • ' •; • • • . '• ... e - ';:" • .. .• c't (1.;.hurirdYor.-._ .4 .. .'be completed by applican • sn , . r,, ‘ ' • ( 1'4 *. 7 .7? Of:•Ito jn.:" h.cts12- ' , . LOtS, 1/4117,0813 ..r4Cre 'ft.2 4 • 'y „, • - 1 4 % •• •`24trirkare,3 , /r4'.;,..-.1PrbposesmUse; of controlled adjoining ladd :• WA: . ' •:. 4: A ' 4. ± . T - 4„ r 't " ` , : 4 r:s ; ;;;;• - :; - ' " . the driving distance. innailes, to :the nearest fire station? Afite01 .3 nt: facilities? ,-,Aftioy''.-"z,,,, Muni" 4 cip al Boundary„;• - L • ' . • Paved . street . - 474"cj..r**4 : r ? JP 7 ;. • 7 . ..4"•!;;;,::./..,y...: „-' l • . - ... . LAND:usE** *** * * * ****yo*„..",*******"*”,.* * iff ** * !I. ** AN * 1 ■Ig* * O !If**•****Y1:,*,,*., * Ill * ‘,41-111■.;,*Celj**iiHert*,:ini;11:***"..,ftfir 4 1 \ -n. j •." Olan Category' .r - ., :t.. •! f 4 • - ' Dwellings ill s ;097)- - :1( Y:ls t - : k '.:tv.. i • 4 4.51.‘C - 6MprehentlVe Cte r - 5 f the plat : ; •raingle yamily , e Ing " 1 - 40,c, %- ...\; -,::, :.- 774'.: si, t . . 'Indicafe proposed, land uPe, 9 - . , • - • ... yr 1 ..? .,.... , ..-; E ., • : • ..... , ,.. - - • _ , ..S Dup lexe't ( , ,.' 1: 9 Indicate lots for : d i ,:f4 . : . t t "( 1 .) .. s :. c which lo S - '" ' :.A... ,-; 4:- 4; i. •t ? :: ' ,., ; t : i ; ‘ .1- Mo bileao (y v 5 ) ,, . ther t • r ( .., ',,) . , De scr other ,119 .•, .. 4. ; _ ... , 2 . ,, iii. . ,, ,, ,... , ,,,,„fe,. ,;, i...,. it; .,:j. .. ; * .4 ::: .. ' 4 1 1.- „. 'T:. a 9 S$4,.* , . - ' i ••• : : .:3• ct rc .±: , . - ;L c / / CA- S i ''Ll 1 c> ... 7' ciD c' e ft9 S21- s" ilhe:aua y' ziontresidestialluse -proposed ds in the Pla , -. - •1 'h , • ,,,, , „.„Y i• ;.;:: ...FS: W .. C- •:,,Q,..:,...: 21- p le 1 - ,. * . 4.4 „ _ . _ . , 1 " :1 q.. • ' .1; .' .r: :,!, h a" . '.:-; e .: ; t.: I.!, ; i n• - ,■ 4 - • ‘V ' -... l ‘ • - ../7 - r q . .. ; ', V' . • 2: .5 ir• W Ea t . • . :I '..'t ' * • '.• % • . 'I . •r**% • fir' . r - a ft ' :o b '. liitt cr'SSfia..:11-,:;',13 f:' ri•jok....,;ji :. A-J: , ....itw i . slhat present, use of the rproper;spropose , e p e . use: , Cul - bileted- land I .1 ' t . 'aCres:.. Pasture:: ' . :-,.-- --,acres....„..1„.•%-- , :,.. imber : 4.4...--,;-*"._ • acres.... Vacant : ' 649 . . acres. Other : ' -.• ,,,.. - &J J'; itaie d F S t , 7 . 4 , . %!: .: . s , , i _ . , . -.... i''... • ' I .** : * . ' - b ; :4 --' • ' . • 1 , --""g • .'' ' . .' .... ..- i .- •1t 1 , - -r s jt,'; r..-18: keeking Ler:Shin:1,as deeired?2:NO (,)(1 ‘ ' • Yes . ( ,•=. 4) .• y Ty/5e : :, :"..:7 -' ' ''', : ?.; •., ,- , ' '-' "P. • ••••• OVEMENTS4* IfIfilf4f7*fillf:lfis•,±1.4%1ASitt 11 ***** *ifIttiP*** S i ityAflf 11 V -01 cA.4' . .• ' :.; fif:lil4.*:' ' • .?5'..r!' ---- -- • .. . • -. ' ''' ''' • : ' -.., - V' 5-5' 5 .* c'. • :-. , ' .)- e - 5 " . 4 - 5. 0 d , „1._P o i you plan, to file r.• tp.a.,c Plati ;....n i ts 'entirety as prbposed,•• or, w]..11/7 1 t „tbe . a- multi7phase ,n, p y,fra , 4opmeiit?,... , ..-n7;e,-.4/ , !:, - ;.1 ,t,i, - . - .: iy.n.--( ... -. , !. - • :k:: ' . ".!',.2i ; ?•,at•Tci..wh:it 'level of, improvement urill streets be constructed? ; 7) -2 - .Miniptwii. :" ..`,,,,t Vii.it . ."'C#b . •aii0Fave)Y( ;: ) . „Curb :did Palied.( )4). - • Paved OnlY A .:.`3:).;,Y. .‘.',. -L ::, ...,...-• c. - 44 ,-, .:;:j.z.l:1/4:-. At!'ff5 4'.....‘ t•Uesoribeyany Combinationa • , f' ..;.*, el 'i . ...'. • * t . * 74. '". ^ ' • - . -. 1 . " ..1..:,... Cf. .: . if, ! c . et , • , „ - _ _. _ e -....'j.What.:113 'Ails' time period expected for •doMplete:delieropment of the Plat : -1/04,46 ki,',.>" s.... ' fl: ..,Street. ' improvements Completed? • :" Subdta:ntiar number ,ofylOts occupied?.' ''.!..k-5.:: - I . i. .: t?..i./ ‘Id.:ded.i:datioia oT any -laid' for' pabiic • usejbonteti)leted? 1 (P .• school's, etc ) ./ ', ', ,, •i VP''se , f 'No. • ( , •..,):, Yes ( X , ) .: De'Scribe ':.. 5,;-;;n // . 17.-7 r k; 1 • .- i ,.. :0 , A , 0.1/4--4: a A P.jrt A. • -; •. , '• ' -.. ....;:;1.*: - ..,", 1 .,4:•.2.; [-A: -reier.../Y-; ' ''' • :.i.‘ r••• 1 4 . ..'• t I''''' " '• the Size of ' iini s 13ro" to he donstruhted i ..- ../, ai o c: : .--"‘:.• 2, oo 0 " of bedrooms „ ` ' ',..Scluar' h e i r . - fe 5'fr.?'t ' • • ' ' I • . • - - ... 7 - Pric e SO. -', 7 5 .0 6 6 n- -: , - 7 ',CC' " - t , 4...t ;..;„ . L il..;iV 4 rik'..• 1,,,. ,.:-.,,,' 7 ,, '• il.. - li :•, • • ;',._1 1. , •ttlii:, - i,/ ).; : $,... \‘‘",.• ,.„..- i . .. • - -: ., N. 7:44 c".7 ' -l: >4: 4 - ri - k . c.,;, V• 1-:,•,:ii!:':Will j tbuildings..,be buill ;.m on the' lots .before - t4ey ; said: t. , No -(' • W. k. J - ( ).T• .7 ..41 V - 1 2 ,..:;2: ' 2 .i.. f.. 2 : .' ; . Me 'Ca f; : if :: Q : . ' : • . . r: "," 't .:.' 't ; - ,P - .. : :.' .. -4 . . c.-4r, , , 1 - • :".: • rs „.. : (/' J . • .- •• ,••.• :•./ ' ' i.: • ,41, :: .,••••. : ; 4 . • - ,,,...y,, • y .... - , Win any 4, spedial deed ieatrictions%beincluded in the sale of lots? No ()<. ). '1:1'7es (5•• 11 z " - r t.' - If . "yea" ‘exblain:. : •2 G : I. i.'4.- • . t '.TO ' • - 4 ' " , 7 -74 4 . i . ' lf i!'" f .:•.4? I - * A " , +. , . „. .t , . . • .. - i. • . • . , . • .. . • - f i "2..4,r. •• - • . ' . , - • . .. _., . ., .. . 4 • t; - • -. , ,- . 4• P•44- : 4" ,,,•.:- ; 4 ,:, ... 4 • ' ' " • •• 4 • Iridi Ce:te the prop6Sed method of Sewage di si5Osan Septic tank ( )'. - Ligeon" ( ":'' ): ' •,:„ ' Treatment plant ( ) . , Other, or combinations (Describe) • ' . ' •••• . 1 • . „ , , ; : t`j:' ' r `...1A+O• Indicate the proposed source of water supply: Individual wells ( • -')•'• Public system, -4 Private community system ( ) . • Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwelling): Underground utility easements ( ) . Overhead utility easements ( - 4. • Utilities in streets ( ). No easements ( - ) , • - . • '•:, \-4'. • . , Indicate the distance from this proposal to the nearest existing watere;niain cep:5; ',2 • - Indicate size of `nearest 'main- - - - - inches: - 4 47 *;-7 * L IA A77 : 1 , 4, 1 :1 14Cci 1 / 2 j f;' 7 .t *' r* ' ; C. Signature ti t r *r* * ** ** ***rrrr r rrriytrrrri r�r,rrri'�r►'► Mr rra.rrs�r� .,• <A ... -Yf, a>j::' �X •a.'. a (... .. . , . **** 41 rrr**** rrrrr rrrr******AMrrMO rr MMr* **rrr rM Mr r***** Part III -to be completed by Health District .•.; A.. Health District staff has completed a field investigation of the site. B. Health District requirements for preliminary s y plats have', (have ' not)_ been' satisfied.. • '.R s E,X H- 'I {'B;ICYx .:p PRELIM:KUL pl,A . A PP m•%... ........ ( _ .. inued)T4 f *t� :UTILITIES _'(Cont1nued)`* ** ***w”ir * ********s.*rM'rMi i * .r.. * .:. * • FList,iitilrty companies or districts expected to provide service to this Iolats "Electricity `.. (,Gas C ,n � � `, e .. '� • � .'Water s n ¢99 Phone ACOWIEmmtIQTS arrrrrw rrrsrr .rrrrsrr rw*rwryrrrwrrrw rrwrr rrrrrrirr rrr °rrrrrrrwrr? PROPOSED x .. ''''' WI V�.PW�4y :. 142:474'.: :r a PLAT NAME Y L } rrt; p • � x „ tine „un have completed the ,'information requestea, and the Preliminary Plat hast een under my supervision in accordance with the requirements' of the ,Spokane o z' - • • Department and' the !awe of -the(S tate' . of `Washingtin , ' 'fi A.. .�.•. .,' Si > � % .:. Dated • A o ...V J TS • l e•∎<AA/ac �, ,, - �D.it'i4N'` r a r Undersigned' swea that the above responses are , made truthfully and to the best' of my lmowledge:'t'p I further s wear that I AM. TH GWNER OF t t' RECORD of'rthe ?site propo as the preliminhry'plat,'or not the owner,"attached'herte f with is ritten ;permission from said owner authorizing My `factions on:hns or•. her,. behlf a.' -.e t IJalso - understand; should� willful "{misrepresen or tation 'willful_ lack or.fulf disclOduie on'my,,part,4:SpokaneCounty mayfwithdraw' any', de claration, ofnon'sign ficance=1, that it'might - issue, in reliance: upon this checklist:. • r ,1 �•, }-fir. . e h - 4 S. i, a ✓� sera � ... 7 L ./,4 r 1, :. • '+ f ' }S: A ;(Signed ('Addre Phone • 4s" • 'IS' 490/214i 92•r0'- PartrII `. to be completed by water purveyor µ s. A 'This subd . sion (is not) situated within our service area "• .i : 7, * are - lable' able) and willing to supply this , 'subdivision with adequate waterpfor, 1...< dome st j',( fire ) (indust • (commercial)' uses ..' ", . ' , ' ; , -I• 4.1'417, 3 atisfactory,, arrangement �) (have not)''be made t serve.thispreposal'.. ru& and'completed) _• • purveyors name ` t` signature'•and 41 .:14 4. • PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) Page 3 * *,* * * * * * * * * * * * *.* * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * *,* * * * * Part IV - To be completed by County Engineers Office A. County Engineers Office - requirements for preliminary plats (knave= aet- been satisfied subject to submission and approval of,drainage calculations and drainage plan. B. ' Signature - s ' AA -- Signatli a and Title * * * * * .* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ; Part V - To be completed by County Utilities Dept. A. County Utilities Department requirements for preliminary plat have (have not) been satisfied. B. Signature Signature and Title Date * )a 05;66'7442- ova �I 4 � �� c:'�a .vrz rr � l / ����l� Cam - This part to be completed by Planning Department Planning Department Information Date Submitted: Date Accepted: Plat File No: Plat Name: Number of Lots: Location: Sec. School District: R E X H I B I T A Hearing Date: l /3°i7 Date. Preliminary Plat Fee:. Checklist Fee: .Zone Change File No: Existing Zoning: Date Established: Advertised Zone Change: Checked by: / • • k...4-1`07c,?,@.;-. ,NoTARtif • otTARtQrgu..;:t.9:1"rPt !tit' ;;F;* ' - • .-.‘ • , &..2%.1; ' • Heiatil;Diiitrict;staff bas ' a mpteted a i ld Hiag;Ph re •:C:ru,Srgna:ture •, ; v. f ..k.; • ' - • '•••• :aigna ture ; - . - • • r't•;•••••";.$), ; i : , s• . • .-; elF; r,4: • 4 -,., ' ^,„•va • .c - . - a .„ .40..t4,. -; ,, . • . •- .„,,..„,c quirements for:preld'yminar•plats have (have no • , ....y.. .• , ..... t: . , 1 % c 2;4.''.1 • : : 7 V.. ' • ft " ' ' ' . ' ;7; t : 3" ‘...1 . 1., ' t: • -' t• . . ' ' ‘ I`IA• 7 ,4 . , ' -• ' . • . ;' ' , .. ' 9 .i . '4 ; f .. \ ' te Ill ■ : *47 7. , (-••• 4 . • .? r .. • : . - G : . ." .. t , : i f , ■ .-t, ' .:‘t: . w . 4 • •■•■■/■7■.2.2 JL :cc\ , ' ' : bZ and titla ! . • ' , • . - - " — .. -1 , : 1 1 , -:, , N A A leti: : • . • 4, r • . " •.-:',- ..... , . . • - ' ' t' 4.- ' • 1 ,.. - - . ::. : ,1 1:, , . • 4 • •••1 - p Xr', H. 1 4;4 T • . A , ?;- y;v:V . a 1 • , .,••• tt"# •• 4./ - • '• :t?" t c. • ' it r' ”t . . „ • *. , Ir.' • - • • • or, • • ••• e • ••••• 4t. • ' ' i4?-..4) . • •t• pu'Ajec+-3-1 - • t.„ • .• Y4 I • • f4... • - , / '•• 4-•••••••e; t• . • ••••• : • ...A, 7' 4„ kte4 To . ‘1 -41, 4 , • . • rte.- - • re.., - 7'41 11.- ; •- •t ” 74:1“.• . • •• "41.r; .71 I ' k ' C o n tt1 ) . t.i.‘47,4,44titfilte. tcv - • „ - •• 1/4- Iv" 2 P '•rt- 44.4H141.,± *.4* 4Z* •• • sf-P41.•.:414; • '-‘4, 1;2 • -•,..t•yr•1/2 ' 1 4 V4 4 , ' Z:CountyA Eng tneer) Offi•ce. , • cltr. i " e ' at -. :: = ‘. • 1., : ' ii r eq iiii'emen ts'' ,.pyle.11in nar,Y P ., : ha - _ ., -. ,,, . 4',.,- , .-", • • ;Al Al I .'• - 444 4 e: • ' ).:% b e e n at 1 eil ,stib to : s u, bm„Is.,1 a pr o s ,,,...,.-.• , , c a c u , . .1 „,. . ;,,, .. ,i 1 . ! 4 . 4 a....t ' 41.5 • ' 4 ." V '1 t: h fr l ' Y ' ' ' •-• I ' I li t ton i n d,Y a itn a[g e . ,„ 4,- ---s, re sy. ,,, : , .., .1 - , 1,. :;,• _•,: , . 1.,. 4:' 7 i .74, - r- ' . ' • t-,<:: - :, cant- - • ,s 4 1 - • • •fly- •N•;.i • . I,. t i nee rs:10 M •-t '2}CAt...`1"7"• s be 's) a om p t ed• by ; C 0 9,.. &.• • .. - .:, ":„ 1/4' • • '•;" Ns. 7 " -•,- • - • - -, - - -c4 , ;` t 7 • f '' I 1. ' 34 .• 11•;-.1'... .y 1. , `3 I 4,•ter ‘1.2-4 na tu.re:24 . • 7"st" 4 4 4' 3 '2 " 4 ' 1. • '• •- .$4/- " •• 4 4 1.7- **1174'Cr. , 0, 1- • gna ure .- .t 41•:*•ZSCI;srit k *7 * tit -,* *, ,* .. ?&. 4# .. : 'k: v;-. "It -• •••S •,:f4;41,e,....42 ?7!" ' .. 4'2 .1V r• , 3 k i37 1 7 C1cin: t t - 31: 7 4 . ?,U ;1 1 1_c;c911 tO 'been 44 (11 Vitgnstu 9 : ( k r • • 7•424.-.4a it 41 v;itttOrkittilt■ elVivrkeJ -; tfrcsfyi. 4 /}.1 ve itmt tz • c btt:41 • . :1:^ 441.4' 4 , • - ' .e.rt • w-1 • 1 ▪ . . • Vtgev,r1 ; .. p R E 1-• LH I HA Y P A Pip L Ii•Olat,'.F ei..z 1 . A 1 0 ' 11 • • 1' "" t•'• • ' e Dat 4 cp Pr. -: • •, 1 :` ;i0 ( A ka ot .;-6 , 30/8/ • 4PREL:i:Atkig sa.:Lz•ff4,71.: , „ s • ”. • 4 • zra• k • :;•4 • • 4.4" 1 41 ' ' • • ; ":••••,-. ▪ • •-••• cr. L ,, • • 1. e • • • • i tt , t4 ging..1 Cop ,r7,-“Acistit • ' ''• .'' - • 4.14 -4.-..- .4:;;;103.14$$%.1.4 a lle t p " m , u eM tke 1 na' % ate fth 5. mD 91#14a have , • : • ";;; • 1t P: h 4 it?,$ C,Cif ..:" ,,• 1 1./Vit‘ C it`A-'*“.:,,',0 • v 1. ,14 • • I t Ylie tt S . 41 • • 1! tr • r •• • ta 47 , ▪ t o, . ! . f•rs5S ...e.. A q t'f& fr.',•-•54€ „,. ,., M...1' t"• 4 at I ke/ t A l f e.eta nd - .1..e,tr4P;41,4%,".;P4Inc..4‘si,e2.41fltrIftWilr '601(A.:Ster41- 4,14.? 4.177.4./.4t2T.C?")...4- tt•a. ` a tef 4 4 O JT . -•• 45 4 • ' 1 .*; 2 1* 1 ".*pg.13kt e,*;. *: ?* .* * Nit* *k.I4* ;i**1- , t * clCieti • ;3' • - ' A- • ( " sersxtg, ffrAc i iisr 4: 4.4. , ki:).•,- ..,,, ;:airtr,s„,„•••••••,. . .,•,- • :.., ,,...- -. .. I.,- . :•• „st •,, it i •,•,..,,: . 2 , ,A.,...,v.14 '''),,C •i erl• - - , • •• - i , •-•• -I, •• ---.1 - L -- -- • c' " - i ' '13' :frt r' - -"• .'"c•i••1. t-r•i •••• - • ? ..• 1 4P:. 4 ,' '? -•-:Z r •' - Z • •••i•Aki...:4 `;•,, i 4, ' •• .s ,. 4,..i, • '.t.-4 ; •., .`, .... . ' • • - la '4. ma't • • 1 % • ..• '"g.? 4 • s 4- 4.` ' c.) ..c• !-• ,,, 4 •,-,,-;. , ,,,.., - 3 4 : : : --.: . • . • .. 71 3 4- 4 .,„ • 3 n1 ,cp,.',•3 '.:,•.: -$ .-' 1. t" ' : ,•4 • ": : n ". 1 q , •--- t ' e It . /;,, t.' 4 : 1 '3 0 ! . -,..- 1 ' 1, 441;24,•.: rill ,•-. • -t ' .'.•.•:.. -..: -- V, . „, .1- •- er; y • -•!: :7: • * :2%3:7 ' • 3 ' • 33 3 1W. 3 7 1.0 7 ;Wili • ." 'al' r '; • 4 ,4 44' $ 1 ;4. 1 " be tit ; t ^ , 2' /.4 1•10 . + hst:r • • 1 4 • . • 4 j .• t stoar ' co m p 1 e ted • Pt , t. , ..a nn, g., tm V 1,0 • •• •' - c' It7 f P • • 4SCP:t.r.k"-147111 • &f j••• •!:, = •rs• 4 5 t r s p-r , . • •• • 7, 1- i4c...t 7 -'4 • ' 1 - - 1 • t. • r 'S • - . a n n in epa 1 f o'rrhet ,„ 44 4. * • 4- jt\ ,../ e L ; ••• . :"It ;.75.1 izitc..ti riret:Tt..w. • r.v.e . g +- •- )•r•-• • , i•t'iltif.,4,1_ t ' 4 ,1. 1.1/4).4 1 ;.; • S : R*,. 7 -4E; • c h o c:t ::;••• •••-, 7 :7 /JV t 'e 'i :12 , 3 bcs ftk • ifi : - .4• • • •••:. t, . ;e4Q-• -„, Hee r,i ng Da 4 • ' 4 • . • I : • et c I. .• 1X : S . t' • ; R.," , L.$ di .1 .g. 1,427", • 0.- . ;• 3 :r1 3 t trt: .&$•,,, 4 0 1 _ 11(. .. t. ..::„. ,, „..,,...„..).::.,,:tiric;. F ee ....c. m ,z*.:(:"., [ i a' t eSubm l i t t ed r:'8 ''.1.-.1*i tgla: - '0-, • it , ‘-'% : - P i' 6 i : i ni i n a rrP I et:: c ..k;•''--tf-alt . . "?..: -, .:Nat . a - I t , , I 4'1 : - 4„ 4. t. .. 4 ". ..t 4 -` • • • 4 /4 • , r:::` ' 4 it r . • :a -:,, ,,..•.5,,- ' • T....)... . •••:•:., 5t . zeta:* 3,L.,Lar ki 45 11; a 440 . s , ,,, .• •,.; .-? ,.„ g ., , .._ ....,i , „;., ' ..:: - I., ‘ - ,..-!. .., • 9" .‘21,, -.7 9,T :tirc.„,„ .•,,, , ,,,D a te - te•A cc pit e a :t.,-).- t1 . ,/' C het k ti ▪ sit‘, E e e3:y .-.......:1; ; '4:.-w??,, lgeilq().4".., 1 1;„.. . •.‘, . t''r T:, , - . :,,•,.' • ,11 , 41: • •" r." c. "''' an • ;$ j - 11 .1 24.'1. -4,4y4:e.3:cr-13.411.1142-141..-1.1-4•Fitell;•41 4 ••""$$ ' P la•V;ErilceIr N o : k's;. •C>t : '7" • • '; ' 1. :• 1 ' sitiorie C ha n'g et' et „Iii...„-tic„... * . . ' ;" ' ''' "` • ' 7 4 - •- K • -3 4.4 4 5:* • 0 1: 43 $ 1 4 . ( 1314 • 1 4 1 ( • t e : ■„:•:;!•it$'? its3r1 ot 4 ••• . , „ • e -.t - • • • - . Ak r .': , 5 4 6 . t...• SA444$ .": &if•,711; 4titafa • 7 i4:14 t4 ;14V • .44: .‘,4 c : :1',:c•l,,;.';41S,,,,ICici-V414:1‘ •ti•PrOt:itrlt• • 7 1V4r11.-3.T: ifixt • • 4.4 , z v erti one;Cha..ng e:.. • • ▪ cheeked?4bsy.;„ 416) • i'-‘•'4 4‘xcick- 23"' •A; 41-6.4 • IS •• • 7 :: 1.4 C • rW•77:ett • •••:••• • : <; ' , OI iN SPEI.I n to Covo1ior July 15, 1921 H & E Investments P. 0. Box 11914, Parkwater Station Spokane, WA 99211 - - FAIL 01 WA5H1NC11 . YJ DEPAR 1 OF ECOLOGY R SPOKANF CIIHN11 th6IIV( 1 JUL1 6 !981 Subject: Wastewater Collection and Treatment Engineering Analysis for River Way Villa in Spokane County Gentlemen: We have reviewed the engineering analysis for the River Way Villa Nodu- lar Home Subdivision. We recognise this document is not meant to ad- dress all environmental concerns, but merely to present a preliminary evaluation of the engineering feasibility of the project. Therefore, this correspondence is intended to delineate only some of the • items that will be ultimately required for final approval: 1. What is the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) status for the project? Prior to transmittal of any approvals for this project, • we will need to have copies of the Proposed and Final Declarations of Non - Significance or a copy of the Environmental Impact State- ment. 2. During the final engineering report phase, we will need to under- take an investigation of the drainfield site. Generally, six soil loge /acre and three percolation testa /acre are required. At your convenience, once the final treatment site has bean determined, please arrange to have a backhoe available so we may inspect the site and designate areas where we would like samples to be taken. 3. Community septic tanks systems will be sized on the basis of 14 times the daily average sewage flow. Your septic tank system is based on a volume equivalent to the average daily flow. 4. The tentative drainfield layout will not provide capability for alteration and dosing of drainfields. Guidelines call for opera- tion of two of the "50x" drainfields in a four doses /day cycle while the third drainfield is rested. 5. Guidelines call for a minimum of 4$' to 5' of undisturbed soil be- tween trenches. The tentative drainfield design utilising the con- cept of a drainfield in a drainfield will only provide a 3' width of undisturbed soil between trenches. 3 COPY ' 4. AKST • adh Page 2 . H & B Investments 6. The wastewater design floe is based on-300 gallons /lot, which is reasonable for a mobile bome:subdivision. Please indicate the ex- pected complexion of the homes, the proportion of modular and mobile units and the size of the units (bedrooms, etc.). 7. There will be a period during which occupancy of the subdivision will be less than full. What is the expected phasing of the de- velopment? How many years will it take to achieve full occupancy? 8. Management of systems such as yours must be by a municipal corpora- tion or an approved special private corporation. Spokane County operates a number of subsurface disposal systems such as yours and we recommend you seek an agreement with them. 9. Surface runoff should be addressed and a statement should be made concerning the seasonal ground water elevations. These are.our preliminary comments at this time. Prior to construction, we will need to review and approve a Comprehensive Engineering Report and Plans and Specifications. An Operation and Maintenance Manual will need to be submitted for approval within three (3) months of construc- tion completion. Should there be any questions concerning this correspondence, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, cc: Century West Engineering Diversified Planning and Development Spokane County Engineer's Office Andrew K. S. Tom Environmental Quality Division SUL -25,-1995 09:41 FROM HILLISCLARK tool C9 4s 7 99 1 ARTICLE 1. NAME ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF RIVER WALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION STANTON - SPOKANE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Washington limited partnership, for the purpose of forming a nonprofit corporation under Chapter 24.03 of the Revised Code of Washington, adopts the following Articles of Incorporation: The name of the corporation is River Walk Owners Association. ARTICLE 2. DURATION The Association shall have perpetual duration. ARTICLE 3 PURPOSES AND POWERS TO 8696620 P.02 STATE r WASMGT0i1 JUL 2' 1995 RALPH MUNRO SECRETARY OF STATE 3.1. The Association does not contemplate pecuniary gain or profit, direct or indirect, to its members. In way of explanation and not of limitation, the purposes for which the Association is formed are: 3.1.1 to be and constitute the Association to which reference is made in the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for River Walk Owners (hereinafter the "Declaration "), recorded or to be recorded in the Records of Spokane County, Washington, to perform all obligations and duties of the Association, and to exercise all rights and powers of the Association, as specified therein, in the Bylaws of the Association ("Bylaws") and as provided by law; and 3.1.2 to provide an entity for the furtherance of the interests of the Owners in the development. 3.2. In furtherance of its purposes, the Association shall have the following powers, which, unless indicated otherwise by the Declaration or Bylaws, may be exercised by the Board of Directors: River D( /n!k Articles oflncorporntion Page f of 7 if Na:n /JJAJ.1 AVOOZ!.DOC MINS JUL -25 - 1995 09:41 FROM HILLISCLRRK (vi) to borrow money for any purpose; TO 8696620 P.03 3.2.1 all of the powers conferred upon nonprofit corporations or homeowners' associations by common law and the statutes of the State of Washington in effect from time to time; 3.2 -2 all of the powers necessary or desirable to perform the obligations and duties and to exercise the rights and powers set out in these Articles, the Bylaws, or the Declaration, including, without limitation, the following: (i) to adopt and amend budgets for revenues, expenditures, and reserves, and impose and collect assessments or other charges to be levied; • (ii) to manage, control, operate, maintain, repair, and improve property subjected to the Declaration or any other property for which the Association by rule, regulation, declaration, or contract has a right or duty to provide such services; (iii) to enforce covenants, conditions, or restrictions affecting any property to the extent the Association may be authorized to do so under the Declaration or Bylaws; (iv) to engage in activities which will actively foster, promote, and advance the common interests of all owners of property subject to the Declaration; (v) to buy or otherwise acquire, sell, or otherwise dispose of, mortgage, or otherwise encumber, exchange, lease, hold, use, operate, and otherwise deal in and with real, personal, and mixed property of all kinds and any right or interest therein for any purpose of the Association; (vii) to enter into, make, perform, or enforce contracts of every kind and description, and to do all other acts necessary, appropriate, or advisable in carrying out any purpose of the Association, with or in association with any other association, corporation, or other entity or agency, public or private; (viii) to act as agent, trustee, or other representative of other corporations, firms, or individuals, and as such to advance the business or ownership interests in such corporations, firms. or individuals; and (ix) to adopt, alter, and amend or repeal such Bylaws and related rules and regulations as may be necessary or desirable for the proper management of the affairs of the Association; provided, however, such Bylaws, River Walk Articles of Incorporation Page 2 of 7 01407614964.2 1 V002t.DOC 71/1.95 31JL -2 -1995 09:41 FROM HILLISCLRRK rules. and regulations may not be inconsistent with or contrary to any provisions of the Declaration. 3.3. The foregoing eaumeradon of powers shall not limit or restrict in any manner the exercise of other and further rights and powers which may now or hereafter be allowed or permitted by law: and the powers specified in each of the paragraphs of this Article 3 are independent powers. not to be restricted by reference to or inference from the terms of any other paragraph or provisions of this Article 3. The Association shall be a membership corporation without certificates of shares of stock. Each Person who is the record owner of a Lot (as such capitalized terms are defined in the Declaration) subject to the Declaration is a member and shall be entitled to vote as set forth herein and in the Declaration and the Bylaws and membership in the Association shall consist exclusively of such owners. ARTICLE 5. BOARD OF DIRECTORS The business and affairs of the Association shall be conducted. managed, and controlled by a Board of Directors. The Board shall initially consist of three (3) directors. The names and addresses of the initial Board of Directors are as follows: P. Edward Dean. Jr. c/o Dean Building Corp. 16720 V.E. 116th Street Redmond. WA 98052 TO 8696620 P.04 ARTICLE 4 MEMBERSHIP Patrick J. Corr c/o Dean Building Corp. 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond. WA 98052 River Walk ,Irticies uJ f rcorporutiou ihinve N96f -I el VnU?LDCC 'O f Mark B. Hancock c/o Dean Building Corporation 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond WA 98052 The number of directors shall be increased to five (5) upon termination of Declarant control of the Association in accordance with the Declaration and Bylaws and may thereafter be further increased or decreased as set forth in the Bylaws so long as no such increase or decrease shall have the effect of shortening the term of an incumbent, creating Page 3 of J6L -25 -1995 09:42 FROM HILLISCLARK an even number of directors, or reducing the number of directors to fewer than five (5). The method of election, term of office, removal and filling of vacancies shall be as set forth in the Bylaws. The Board may delegate such operating authority to such companies, individuals, or committees as it, in its discretion, may determine. ARTICLE 6. LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS To the full extent that the Washington Nonprofit Corporation Act permits the elimination of limitation of liability of directors, a director of the Association shall not be liable to the Association or its members for monetary damages for conduct as a director; provided that the liability of a director shall not be eliminated or limited for acts or omissions that involve intentional misconduct or a !mowing violation of law, for approval of distributions or loans contrary to law, or for any transaction from which the director has personally received or will personally receive a benefit in money, property, or services to which the director is not legally entitled. ARTICLE 7. VA/HUD APPROVAL TO 8696620 P.05 As long as the Declarant (as such term is defined in the Declaration) has the right to appoint and remove the directors and officers of the Association as provided in the Bylaws, the following actions shall require the prior approval of the U.S Department of Veterans Affairs ( "VA "), so long as the Development is approved by the VA for the guaranteeing of mortgages in the Development, and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD"), so long as the Development is approved by HUD for the insuring of mortgages in the Development: annexation of additional property to the Development, except for by Declarant in accordance with Section 9.1 of the Declaration; mergers and consolidations; mortgaging of Common Property (as such term is defined in the Declaration); dedication of Common Property to any public entity; dissolution; and amendment of these Articles of Incorporation. ARTICLE 8. DISSOLUTION The Association may be dissolved only upon a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors and the affirmative vote of members who are Owners of not less than two - thirds (2/3) of the Lots (other than the Declarant) and the consent of the Declarant so long as the Declarant owns any property subject to the Declaration or which may be unilaterally subjected to the Declaration by the Declarant. Upon dissolution of the Association, so long as the VA is guaranteeing and/or HUD is insuring any mortgage in the Development, and unless otherwise agreed in writing by HUD or VA, as applicable, any remaining real property assets of the Association shall be dedicated to an appropriate River {Valk Articles of Incorporation Pagr 1 of 7 9141176 14964-2 4 D7RI2!. DOC 7111195 . JUL -25 -1995 09 FROM HILLISCLPRK TO 86Q6620 P.06 public agency to be used for purposes similar to those for which this Association was created. In the event that such dedication is refused acceptance, such assets shall be granted, conveyed and assigned to any nonprofit corporation, association, trust or other organization to be devoted to such similar purposes. No such'restriction shall exist if VA is not guaranteeing and HUD is not insuring any mortgage in the Development; provided, however, HUD and/or VA shall be notified of such dissolution. ARTICLE 9. MERGER AND CONSOLIDATION The Association may merge or consolidate only upon a resolution duly adopted by the board of directors and the affirmative vote of members who are Owners of not less than two - thirds (2/3) of the total Association Vote and the consent of the Declarant so long as the Declarant owns any property subject to the Declaration or which may be unilaterally subjected to the Declaration by the Declarant. ARTICLE 10. AMENDMENTS These Articles may be amended only upon a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors and the affirmative vote of at least two- thirds (2/3) of the total Association Vote; provided, however, no members shall be entitled to vote on any amendment to these Articles of Incorporation for the sole purpose of complying with the requirements of any governmental (including, without limitation, HUD or VA) or quasi governmental entity or institutional lender authorized to fund, insure or guarantee mortgages on individual Lots, as such requirements may exist from time to time, which amendments may be adopted by the Board of Directors. River lWWalk.-lrticles of incorporation 11 / JO %614964 -2 4VOn?!.DOC 1111195 ARTICLE 11. INCORPORATOR The name and address of the sole incorporator is Michael F. Schumacher, c/o Hillis Clark Martin & Peterson, P.S., 500 Galland Building, 1221 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101 -2925. Page $ of 7 SUL -25 -1995 09:43 FROM HILLISCLRRK River Walk Articles of Incorporation 014076 14964 -2 .4 V002 /. DOC 7 /11NS ARTICLE 12. REGISTERED AGENT AND OFFICE TO 6696620 P.07 The initial registered office of the Association shall be located at 500 Galland Building, 1221 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101 -2925, and the initial registered agent at such address is Hillis. Clark Martin & Peterson, P.S. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed. these Articles of Incorporation this4Jt„day of , 1995. VIA 444 Ste._ MICHAEL F. SCHUMACHER Page 6 of 7 • April 2, 1997 DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director Todd Whipple; P.E. Inland Pacific Engineering 707 West 7th Avenue Spokane, WA 99204 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Plan Change Approval Rescinded - Mission /Harmony Gentlemen: • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC 1VORKS DEPARTMENT We have received the revised sketch of the sidewalk revision at this location. As we had discussed at our meeting on March 28, 1997. the previous drawings for this plan change did not indicate the utility riser just west of the northerly end of the curb return. We note that the current utility riser location is now squarely in the middle of the proposed sidewalk. and that existing landscaping has not been indicated. We are therefore required to rescind our approval of the previous plan change drawing. Future submittals of this proposed plan change will need to demonstrate that any necessary relocation of utilities has been effected. This may be shown by submittal of the utility company's relocation plan as part of the plan change package. Relocation of other surface or subsurface features needs to be addressed. Future submittals will also need to bear the signed, dated stamp of a Washington State - licensed Professional Engineer prior to the County's review of the submittal. We also note that the original mylar set of the project plans had not yet been revised to reflect the revised sidewalk location. In order to begin construction, the original mylar set of the current plans on tile at the County Engineer's Office will need to be revised after the plan change has been accepted by the County. and then re- approved, so that the consuuction plans may be re- issued. Please note that a permit will be required for that portion of the work to be accomplished or conducted within the County right of way. Any questions regarding plan revisions should be addressed to Ed Parry. Sylvia Lightfoot will be able to assist with questions related to permit requirements. They may be reached at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours. William A. Johns, P. E. Spokane County Engineer Olaf , Edward . P , Jr., P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: project file reviewer Mark Hancock, Dean Housely Company. 16720 N.E. 116th Street, Redmond, WA 98052 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 April 2, 1997 Todd Whipple, P.E. Inland Pacific Engineering 707 West 7th Avenue Spokane, WA 99204 SUBJECT: PI414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Plan Change Approval Rescinded - Mission /Harmony Gentlemen: We have received the revised sketch of the sidewalk revision at this location. As we had discussed at our meeting on March 28, 1997, the previous drawings for this plan change did not indicate the utility riser just west of the northerly end of the curb return. We note that the current utility riser location is now squarely in the middle of the proposed sidewalk. We are therefore rescinding our approval of the previous plan change drawing � Klj'1Vad Future submittals of this proposed plan change will need to demonstrate that any necessary relocation of utilities has been effected. This may he shown by submittal of the utility company's relocation plan as part of the plan change package. Future submittals will also need to bear the signed, dated stamp of a Washington State - licensed Professional Engineer prior to the County's review of the submittal. We also note that the original mylar set of the project plans had not yet been revised to reflect the revised sidewalk location. In order to begin construction, the original mylar set of the current plans on file at the County Engineer's Office will need to be revised after the plan change has been accepted by the County, and then re- approved, so that the construction plans may be re- issued. Please note that a permit will be required for that portion of the work to be accomplished or conducted within the County right of way. Any questions regarding plan revisions should he addressed to Ed Parry. Sylvia Lightfoot will he able to assist with questions related to permit requirements. They may be reached at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, William A. Johns, P. E. Spokane County Engineer Edward J. Parry, Jr., P.G. Plan Review Engineer cc: project file reviewer Mark Hancock, Dean Housely Company, 16720 N.E. 116th Street, Redmond, WA 98052 #ps March 31, 1997 W.O. 96083 Spokane County Engineers Engineering Development Services 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 Attn: Ed Parry Jr., P.E. Re: Riverwalk (PE- 1414 - 81/95) Riverwalk 6th exhibit drawing Dear Ed: Sincerely, Susan Murphy, E.I.T. sm enc. cc: file J: I Doan ment 1960331 exh ib 707 West 711, • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 I PO INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 RECD. INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. APR 02 I t - r. COIIitTY ENGI \Lc.' , Enclosed please find an exhibit drawing of Lot 13, Block 1 of Riverwalk 1" Addition, showing the power transformer location. (SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE UTILITY ESMT.) (OLD RIGHT OF WAY) LOT 13, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1 ST ADDITION (SOUTH SIDE OF EXIST. HOUSE) (FACE OF CURB (TO FENCE) 1! rte • (FUTURE ACQUISITION A REA) WW4 ' (NEW RIGHT OF WAY) MISSION AVENUE 5' 14' w z NSTALL WHEELCHAIR RAMP RIVERWALK 7TH ADDITION N 1 DATE: 3/26/97 J REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION i36:60 • DATE NOVaiidt '8 ' 1996 ROAD NAME MISSION AVENUE 0/4140/ toffe CRP/RID # N/A NAME OF PLAT - RIVERWALK1ST ADDITION Plat # PE-1414s81/95 ADDRESS OF BLDG .---- 14/A NAME OF BLDG PROJECT B9 N/A 7 8 • - 125/1 R45F, WN FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT 4' NIA - • EXISTING CONDMONS: t PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: ROAD WIDTH 40 ROAD SURFACE ACP ACP AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC 2400 ADT 3120 ADT Current Traffic Count Design Year raffle Count PROJECTDESCIUPTION •SEE ATTACHED LETTER 5to-UltIz PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION SEE ATTACHE) LETTER . . _ . JUSTIFICATION: SUBMITTED BY TODD WHIPPLE " 7 1 'A FI E DATE NOIER11,194()__ ADDRESS 707 WEST 7TI1 AVENUE. SUITE 200 SPOKANE. WA • PHONE # (5091 458-6840 SEE ATTACHED LETTER ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF 510.00 J'AID TO SPOKANE COUNTY 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260-0170 PH N (509)456-3600 FAX (509)324-3478 -FtQUEST WILL NOTIBE RE Vt WE6 WITHOUT FUNDS- CASH/CHECK 1 I # 905 RECEIVED BY kNslesign.dev 2/96 ZIP CODE 99204 DATE //- / -91 NOU -12 -1996 12:06 INLAND PRCIFIC ENG r- De b I 1/141h, ,N L c-- ■ m 0 m 0 m P.02 NOU -12 -1996 12:05 ir INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Telephone - (509) 458 -6840 FAX - (509) 458 -8844 • NOTES: En— INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.01 1. DATE: ▪ TO: et) TAR-IS zie.,pE. le COMPANY: �o co. c -1_ ▪ FAX NUMBER: 5z4- 54 Rw2 • FROM: 5. f%tarpk 9 ▪ NUMBER OF PAGES: INCL COVER PAGE Z kz & - IIBC teat o - NG Saet CL X61.“- S T %Uveti `Y Fegti J Tt TaJvsei SLL AUC Loc.A -.. T 0D IS Our 6e The o ACs - rbtA , APD *1M/iIJ Te.40 CLAW WC- w&ra ►' ur The •PRoPos&D Ls' 6r= Mt, ' M kilLE IF 1.1-E LOA-Orb to Et 136 R2cP. LocAttoz - TZC SE A-1 'ice - PjPt 4c terF 11iE ESMr rum 9- e- Si L , A , - rw esMr 15 Ate Fe42) l.v t,L,P /D ivy , R Nu-hl JOB NUMBER FAX TRANSMISSION MI USTA (CI N W W i0 0 0 to in co M ool 0 c') In �1 0 0 0 z \ /- FOUND 1/2' REBAR / V/ PLASTIC CAP � j RI S M22121 - . r 18 17 1 I 1 UNPLATTED NOT A PART N89'56'50' V N89'56'50'W — FD. SPOKANE COUNTY BRASS CAF' AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #2455 RP'S PER COUNTY RECORD. • 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) 25' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE m SEE DETAIL 'B' 10' FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA --12 ti - 627.62' o + .4 :c,,au S * 589'54'16'C --t 103.63' : _ g o gl • 6,73 SF^" .fin Z • N89'54'16'Vj • 103.63' • 6,756 SF S89'54 W o vl 103.63' ri o 0 aa d N O 0 . 9 p 0 0 o e KJ 6,736 5F4) •q vi °o o . (- NB 9'S4.16'V °{ • N o o 103.63' d Z • 10 ▪ 6,736 SF 0 c x 89 4 '1 'C • 4 6,736 SF . 1033 ,61' 5E19'54 12 0 0 6.73 6 SF' '' S89g51'6'EI • 13 j °; 9,391 SEA � I sic 25' 25' L4.1 O 00 0 ON 0 0 z 2s /2. 552.80' .. 111 1 ! 0' • � o `0 MISSION AVENUE I r 100.00' N89'5 V E 6,41 SF vN! L2 cu 49.98' L8 (: CO'. 2.6: . ® N � (7 , g2 a ui I 6 SF P 4k16r59'58' y 70.00' 1,1 f a.-1:-.22. 0' 1 6,737 SF L20LD. °z L7 -J J 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 S 89'56'44' E 2615.78' (RL1) N 89'56'50' W 2615.78' 01) `DRAINAGE `LASEMEN o AUGUSTA LANE 1988.16' SEE SHEET 4 (SOUTH SIDE OF EXIST. HOUSE) X x. x (SIDEWALK, SLOPE,-N (FACE OF CURB h DRAINAGE (TO FENCE) p, UTILITY ESMT.) (OLD RIGHT OF WAY) H N' `(BUILDING SETBACK) n (FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA) (NEW RIGHT OF WAY) MISSION AVENUE 1 SCALE: 1"=-20' LOT 13, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1 ST ADDITION 11/08/96 707 West 7th • Suite Spokane, WA 99204 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 200 (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458-6844 (SIDEWALK, SLOPE,-N DRAINAGE UTILITY ESMT.) iA N (OLD RIGHT OF WAY) R LOT 13, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION (SOUTH SIDE OF EXIST. HOUSE) x x (FACE OF CURB (TO FENCE) m (BUILDING SETBACK) (FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA) (NEW RIGHT OF WAY) MISSION AVENUE SCALE: 1" =20' 11/08/961 Spokane, WA 99204 1 INLAND I PAENGINCIFIC • EERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 November 8, 1996 W.O. No. 96106 Spokane County Public Works W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Attn: Ed Parry, P.E. INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Re: Riverwalk 1st Addition Mission Avenue, Post Construction Design Deviation Dear Ed: It is my understanding that you have had several conversations with Mark Hancock regarding the right -of -way and easement situation on Mission Avenue between Stations 15 +00 and 16 +00 along Lot 13, Block 1 at Riverwalk 1st Addition (RW1). Mark Hancock, with the Dean Housley Company, has indicated to me that he has discussed with both you and Dave Berto that the recorded plat is actually missing 10 -feet of slope, sidewalk and drainage easement area from that shown on the approved plans and referenced in the recorded plat. We believe that this has resulted from a misunderstanding of the difference between the easement and it's relationship to the future acquisition area. It appears that the 25 -foot slope, drainage, sidewalk and utility easement has included the 10 -foot future acquisition area within it. Based upon our review and our work on Riverwalk 7th addition it is apparent that these two should have remained separate and distinct. THEREFORE, THIS DESIGN DEVIATION PROPOSES A REVISION TO THE MISSION AVENUE APPROVED CROSS SECTION TO ONLY ALLOW A 15 -FOOT SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ADJACENT TO THE 10 -FOOT FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA. THIS WOULD DEVIATE FROM THE APPROVED 25 -FOOT EASEMENT CALLED OUT ON THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPOKANE COUNTY SPECIAL SECTION. Included with this submittal are the following 1. A copy from the recorded plat map showing the existing 20 -foot ROW, the new dedicated 10 -feet of ROW, a 10 -foot future acquisition area and a 25 -foot sidewalk, slope, drainage and utility easement. Please note that on the plat this 25 foot easement is shown inaccurately as the l0 -foot future acquisition area has been made part of this 25 foot easement rather than keeping them separate. This is where the discrepancy has occurred. 2. A copy of the Approved plan sheet of Mission Avenue within this area. 3. A copy of the Approved plan sheet of the special Mission Avenue section. 4. An exhibit showing how the house and fence were actually constructed on lot 13 block 1 of RW I. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 I PO 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 Nuv Z'w::ll SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER I Spokane County November 8, 1996 Page 2 We would like for you to note, that IPEC was not the design engineer or the surveyor of record on either the plat or the approved plan set. The engineer and surveyor of record was North Idaho Engineering. We are only providing this design deviation as a service to the Dean Housley Co. Secondly, the house on Lot 13, is now sold and occupied so that there is no longer an option to revise the plat without making this lot unusable as the house would be within the 25 -foot easement. Lastly, a site visit has revealed that the sidewalk was constructed at the back of curb and will be removed and placed as far onto the lot as possible to be outside of the future acquisition area. Please see enclosed lot exhibit for proposed location. As usual your prompt attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated. Should you have any questions regarding this issue please feel free to call at 458 -6840. Sincerely, Inl. d Pacific ineering Co., I hip le, file dd R. ' P.E. TRW /tw cc: Dean - Housley, Mark Hancock Christine O. Gregoire ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Transportation & Public Construction Division PO Box 40113 • Olympia WA 98504 -0113 • (360) 753 -6126 JDS:sme Attachment MEMORANDUM October 23, 1996 TO: Mark Rohwer, Eastem Region FROM: -y I� her Assistant Attorney General RE: River Walk Letter of Commitment Attached please find the River Walk Letter of Commitment with my approval as to form. This agreement evolved from the willingness of the developer to pay cash for the signal construction; but the inability of WSDOT to accept cash contributions for mitigation efforts that are not presently scheduled for construction. We did consider several altematives including escrow accounts, and I suggested that the situation could be resolved in strict compliance with the statutes by placing the county in the middle as the administrator of a mitigation account. I was informed this was not possible since the county was not interested in setting up these types of accounts where no designated project is yet in existence. I believe that is a very conservative approach on the county's. part. RCW 82.02.020 appears to authorize mitigation accounts administered by counties for the benefit of state transportation improvements under the authority of interlocal agreements. Since the county is not interested in administering these types of accounts under interiocal agreements where there is no scheduled project, the only viable alternative is to rely upon the contractor to finance the improvement when it is time to constrict the traffic light. Obviously, development is a risky enterprise and the State is not interested in accepting an unenforceable promise. That is why the developer has procured a surety bond to guarantee performance at a future date. As there appears to be no alternative, I have agreed to approve the letter of agreement as to form only to ensure that this improvement is appropriately financed at the time of construction. • 171 Washington State Department of Transportation Sid Morrison Secretary of Transoortation Mr. Doug Birch Parkland Homes Inc. 14410 Bell -Red Road Bellevue, WA 98007 September 23, 1996 Eastern Region 2714 N. Mayfair Street Spokane. WA 99207 -2090 (509) 324 -6000 Re: Riverwalk Letter of Commitment Dear Mr. Birch: This commitment is made between the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and the Parkland Homes Inc. (Murray- Franklyn Corp) hereafter referred to as the developer(s), its successors and assignees to ensure a traffic signal system shall be installed by the developer(s) when deemed necessary by WSDOT at the Barker Road and I -90 Eastbound on/off ramp termini. This agreement requires a Surety Bond be signed by an approved surety company that is registered with the Washington State Insurance Commissioner, and appears on the current Authorized Insurance List in the State of Washington published by the Office of the Insurance Commissioner in the amount of $105,300.00 secured for the above signal improvement until the improvement is completed. As a result of the developer funding the 100% payment of this traffic signal and related equipment all parties agree to the following conditions: 1. WSDOT and Spokane County shall work with the sponsors /owners of upcoming Phases of Riverwalk to reimburse the above developer in a pro -rata amount before additional final plats are recorded. Phases 4 thru 7 (totaling 177 lots) of the Riverwalk development shall add up to 100% and the pro -rata share shall be calculated on each Phase's impact to this '100%. This reimbursement shall be to the above developer with written notification to WSDOT and Spokane County of the transaction prior to finalization of any additional plats. 2. The developer shall enter into a developers agreement with WSDOT and upon execution of this letter of commitment, post the needed surety bond for the above signal and related improvements. 3. This commitment shall be valid for 7 years from the date it is signed below by WSDOT or when all of the above phases (4 thru 7) are finalized, whichever occurs first. After this period this agreement shall be considered completed in all respects ending reimbursement by others. • September 23, 1996 Page 2 Your signature in the Endorsement section of this letter documents your acceptance including successors and assignees to this agreement. The Department requests that you acknowledge this agreement by completing the Endorsement below and returning this original letter along with the surety bond to this office. If you have any questions or require further information, please feel free to contact me in our Planning Office at 324 -6199. ENDORSE1IENT Parkland Homes Inc. (Murray- Franklyn Corporation) Firm: Parkland Homes 'Inc. (Murray- FranklyrPate: By: G Federal Tax Number: (7_ /5137¢/ ENDORSEMTNT (Spokane County Engineers) By; / 6/2 By: Dat ENDO ' SEMENT APP OVED AS TO FORM MR/gf cc: Louis Webster, Spokane County Planning Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers Todd Whipple, Inland Pacific Engineering Sincerely, Title: Date: got> ROHWER Acting Regional Planning Engineer 9/224/96 Lr�c/ Date: V-'27/?-7 By: /0%V/% Assistant Attorney General INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST 600 103thAvenue, N.E., Suite 847 ' Bellevue, WA 98004 - (206) 455 - 0102:- Fax (206) 455 -0827 a contract dated , 19 • , With the perfarn the following work, to wit: Traffic Signal for Riveraalk £ DO / fj SUBDIVISION � l Principal BY: / ,0i rj e / ee d / l - eRtd',C BOND Bond No. 149 09 82 ON ALL HEN BY THESE PRESEEYtS: That Parkland .Homes, Inc. as Principal, and the IBSyRA9CE ( 3KRAHY: oP TE? Wes, a corporation' organised and existing under the laws of the State of California and authorized to transact surety bssiras in the sate of Washington, as Surety, are held and firmly bound tmto Washington State Department of Transportation inthesun of One hundred five thousand thre0 hundred dollars Dollars ($1r1`z' ' CO 1, for the pays:ent whereof, well and trruly:to be sada, said Principal and Surety bind theEelves, their heirs, adnnsfrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, finly by these presents. • The condition of the foregoing obligation :is such that, ihereas the above bounden Principal has enteied into to do and NOW, THEREFORE, if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly, perfon the work contracted to be performed under said contract, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to:remain la fuii force and effect. SIDED and SEALED this .Z 91 <2" day of �Y- .'� -�^' -� _ —t , ig 96 INSU_R?NCE COMPANY OF TH ' S-1. !SUSAN B. LARSON ltt rney-in - fact xVd w£ :6T S'6 /I£ /L0 Insurance Company of the \Vest • HOME OFFICE: SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA POWER OF ATTORNEY 0 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST. a California Corporation, does hereby aopomC SUSAN B. LARSON its true and lawful Attorneyts•m-Fact, wan full power and authority. to execute, on oenall of the Company. beefily and surety bcncs. uncerakings. and Other contracts ol.suretysm0 Of a similar nature. This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors on the 22nd day of November. 1994. which said Resolution has not Dean amended or rescinded and of which Ine following is a • true copy: "RESOLVED. that the Chairman of the Board. the President. an Executive Vice President or a Senior Vice President of the Company. and each of them, is hereby au:norized to execute Powers of Attorney qualifying the attorney named in the given Power of Attorney to execute on behalf of the Company. fidelity and surety bonds. undertakings. or other contracts of suretyship of a similar nature; and to attach thereto the seal of the Company; provided however. that the absence of the seal shall not affect the validity of the instrument. FURTHER RESOLVED. Ina: tale signatures of sucn officers and the seal of the Company. and the signatures of any witnesses, the signatures ano seal 01 any notary. and the signatures of any officers certifying the validity of me Power of Attorney, may tie affixed by facsimile.' IN WITNESS WHEREOF. INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST has caused tnese presents to be signed by its duly authorized officers this 13th day of December t9 94., STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS , COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO December 13th 1994 On this before mo personally appeared John L. Hannum, Senior Vice President of INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST. personally known tome to be the individual and officer who executed the within instrument. and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his official capacity and that by his signature on the instrument the corporation an benalf of wnicn he acted. executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal ICW 37 CERTIFICATE: OFFICIAL SEAL FRANCIS FAFAUL ;rte VV V NOTARY PUBLiC-CALIFCFNW SAN MYCOM N PI RES AUGUST11,1995 INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST _ ,/ y ._.._L —cam Jcnn L. Hannum. Senior Vice President Notary Pubic delirtZ I, E. Harned Davis. Vice President of INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST. do hereby cenily that the original POWER OF ATTORNEY. of which the foregoing is a true copy. is still in full force and effect. and that this certificate may be signed by facsimile under Inc authority of the above quoted resolution. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I have subscribed my name as Vice President. on this 23rd day of SEPTEMBER 19 96 • INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST ei 'r z; E. Harped Davis. Vice President 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208) 664 -3507 To: Spokane County Engineers Date: 8/31/94 Job no. 4004 Attn: Ref: We are transmitting * Status * The Following X Drawings Calculations X Report X Letter Maps Check $ Plans X See at Right Please North Idaho Engineering, Inc. Ed Parry Riverway Villa First Addition X Herewith Proposed For Information Separate Cover Preliminary As requested Via Mail In Progress Your Files Delivery X Revised Your Submittal Personal Pickup Final X Checking Fedex As -built X Approval UPS For Payment Your Use Other Partial Other Call immediately Call after review X Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Regd. Review /Comment No action Regd. TRANSMITTAL From: James 0. Morris Specific Items: 3 copies revised Street & Storm Drainage Imp. Plans Revised Hydrology Study(2) Sewer Plans /Water Plans "R" Valve Test (2) Landscape Plans Letter from Spokane Co. Fire Protection Dist #2 Revised Plans highlighted in color W/Letter Messag E C E @V E D Ai iG 0 1 1gPL 901tANE n1uNn F,+c; ;.r.: Fonn 304 C Copies for Riverwalk 1st Date Paid NA y 3 19 cc So I - 7 1 °7 $19 85 $19 85 Engineer's Receipt No. Treasurer's Receipt No No. OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Mark Hancock 16720 NE 116th St Redmond WA 98052 Make check payable to County Treasurer, and mall to: ENGINEER'S OFFICE W. 1026 BROADWAY SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 Date To SPOKANE COUNTY, Co. Rd. E.R.& R. Fund POKANECOUNT 1, : OX 199 ' = POKANE',1 .- -210- AMT. OF ACCOUNT AMT. PAIn BALM DUE ACCOUNT ics * *t * * * ** ** - RECEIPT ate ' . _ 3 19/ co 2001 Received From IVr_ 'A•dctss : ` �!-� � _ �:� c ollars $1 >5� For .ALP n 8'l_ 1lI MONEY • l OC +ER HOW PAID KANE i.GUNTY ENGINEERS ST 1026 BROADWAY By ' KANE WA 99260 _ or Riverwalk 1st SURER rh 199 Svkit NAY 3 0 19g6 cc& ( -j KEY BANK OF WASHINGTON Bellevue on Fourth 10655 NE. 4th St. Bellevue, WA 98004 19- 57/1250 002041 * * *** * * * * * ** *Nineteen dollars and 85 cents DATE CHECK NO. AMOUNT June 10, 1996 2041 $tt * * * * ** *19.85 SGG_ ems: 1 March 4, 1996 Mr. Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer North 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 Re: Stanton Development Company Our Account No: 01402981 Dear Mr. Hormann: We have a hold on the above account for Spokane County, placed in July, 1995. We have an incomplete copy of the agreement (picture enclosed) and need a copy of the final agreement signed by you. I have enclosed a return envelope, would you send a copy for our records to comply with auditing. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, Diane Lang . 9 Customer Service ENTERPRISE BANK Lincoln Plaza / 11225 S.E. 6th Street / Bellevue, Washington 98004 / 206- 454 -7070 / FAX 206- 455 -0497 July 5, 1995 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Todd Whipple, P.E. IPEC Michael Hunt, P.E. North Idaho Engineering SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk 1st Addition Approval Gentlemen: A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director I am enclosing a photomylar set of the road and drainage plans for this project with the County's approval stamp; the original mylars are on file at the Public Works Department. In accordance with Section 2.02.A.3 of the SCRS, this approval is valid until July 5, 1997. If the facilities are not constructed, you may request an extension for an additional two years; the plans shall be revised to reflect current standards prior to granting the extension. If you have any questions, please contact me at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P. E. Spokane County Engineer gine fl.e. Edward J. PaS Jr. , P.E. Plans Review Engineer encls: Plans (12 sheets) - photomylar cc: project tile reviewer 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 Apr:' 2.; 1982 zinc ings & Order Ifls SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Spokane County Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee on March 30, 1982 and the members of the Committee present being Jerry Williams, Chairperson, John Culler, and El,;on Thomas. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, H & E Investments, is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat and Zone Change for PE-1414 -81, Riverway Villa, and ZE- 92 -81, Agricultural to Residential Manufactured Homes and Commercial, and PUDE -1 -82, Planned Unit Development, for the subdivision or 118 acres into 365 lots for manufactured homes with common open space, plus one commerical site, and there being present, the following applicant or representative: C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1 Jim Craven File Nn. ^E- 1414 -81 -92 PUDE:'I -82 1. That the existing land use in the area is predominately single- family homes west of Barker Road and predominately manufactured homes east of Barker Road and north of the Spokane River with approximately half of the near vicinity in cultivated field on both sides of Barker Road. 2. That the proposed manufactured home P.U.G. would be compatible with the surrounding land uses due to the many existing manuracture.d homes in the area. 3. That the proposal is well designed and thought out. 4. That when developed with the amenities as proposed, this development will be a complement to the community. 5. That the „amen will be considered to assure_an attractive development_ when--the"''.U:D. Final- DevefbpmenE'Plan' "rs"'adtad on'aGa public hearing. 6. That great care has been taken to condition this development to assure resolution of problems and impacts as mentioned by the public in the public hearing and in the E.I.S. of the proposal. 7. That it would be detrimental for this proposal to require a 6 -ft. earthen berm, that the development should not be hidden. April 2, 1982 Findings & Order 8. That .the s@ be_ re�ui`ed work with .adjacent prooerty owner ap d ac u re s T thenece ary addition l 15' fc bf�',B cat{S'c ssgre p eyrmQ� o ements onTMBarker,,; between the Spoka e R4,yeer and to accommodate traffic. 9. That it is unreasonable to expect this development lo pay toward improve- ments of the Barker Road /I -90 Interchange, since the Interchange is over two blocks (approximately 1/4 mile) away, and many other existing develop- ments generate traffic which also use the Interchange. That the public is responsible for such improvements. 10. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed both approval and disapproval of the proposed use. 11. That many of„the.... public - concerns : .,.the,_existing traffic conjestion, Fa i SPRg and safgt,y for school _ch,rldren:,.alongBa'rkzr Road wi be tide wheni veto p ment_:sponsor l,yider�s — Barker _one. Road adds. srcewalks p ..: s Barker _ tr n . ,Roads aod ,.. � _Avenue..and.�.wttl�;,i , yregu�edz-- partrcipafe in 4 .1 signalization .of the Mission - Barker intersection with .trdss ,walks. 12. That the proposal is required to be finalized in 6 to 8 phases to evenly distribute the impacts (as traffic and school children) over 8- to 10- years. 13. That the proposal site is a cultivated field. 14. That the existing zoning of the proposal site is Agricultural Zone. 15. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this and the surrounding area as URBAN. I. 16. That the proposal, as conditioned, does significantly comply with many of the major policies of the plan; as urban setting and level of services, fill -in, providing a variety of lifestyles, buffering, utilities, sides. alks, water quality, energy management, transportation, and Wastewater Manage- ment Plan. 17. That the proposed R.N1.H. zoning with P.U.D. overlay zdr is suitable for the zoning and and use of the area. 18. That the proposed commercial zone, conditioned for neighborhood and local serving uses is appropriate for the existing and future residential needs of the area and is properly located at a major arterial intersection. 19. That the provisions of RC,v 43.21C (The State Environmentai Policy Act) have been complied with. 20. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item, have been fulfilled. 21. That the Draft and Final E.1.5. were considered. 2 File Nn. 14'1.1 -8 92 8'I PUDE; -1 -82 • Aprri' 2, 3982 File N 1414 -81 Findings & Order LE -92-81 DUDE: 1 -82 22. That the March 30, 1982 Staff Analysis was considered. 23. That the public written and verbal testimony was considered. 24. The Hearing Examiner finds the proposed use as conditioned is r.ot detri-. mental to the general purpose or otherwise harmful to the public health, safety, and welfare. D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS SUBDIVISION APPROVAL: 1. Those conditions within the March 30, 1982 S.taff Analysi ., except as amended below. 2. Amend PLANNING CONDITION #14, to read as follows: That if the sponsor /applicant opts to establish solar access /exposure easements for a particular phase of this proposal, a copy of a "draft" final plat showing the location of proposed structures and building setback lines will be submitted for review and approval by the County Building & Safety Department, the County Subdivision Administrator, the County Engineer's Department, and the County Health District to determine which lots may utilize zero lot line setbacks and any other measures necessary to assure fire safety and proper solar access. 3. Amend ENGINEER CONDITION #14 to read as follows: Existing County roads providing access to the plat shall be paved and curbed to the Spokane County Standards. 4. Amend ENGINEER CONDITION #24 by deleting all but 3rd paragraph so as to read as follows: Traffic analysis for each phase will serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Should the analysis determine a need for intersection upgrading, the developer will be assessed a proportionate share for the required improve- ments. E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of PE- 1414 -81, Riverway Villa, and ZE -92-81 Agricultural to R.M. H. and Commercial and PUDE -1 -82, .. .:unit .development, for a preliminary plat and zone change is hereby PPROVED. Motion by: Culler Seconded by: Thomas Vote: Unanimous 3 April 2, 1982 Find ngs•& Order ATTEST: FO-H /b Jerry Williams - aye John Culler - aye Eldon Thomas - aye JOHN NUNNERY Subdivision Administrator 4 gym • </, ' t..�.. erbon File No. °E- 141;-81 E -92 -81 PUDE-1 -82 HEARING EXAMINER tOP.1MI TTEE V A Aril r, i/ '?/feel,: 4r,4'? d it %,Jari Mr. Sam Angove Spokane County Park Dept. W. 1115 Broadway Spokane, WA 99201 March 24, 1982 RE: Riverway Villa - Bike Path Easement Dear Sam: LAWYERS On behalf of our clients, Jim Etter and Walt Hedlund, we would like to confirm our understanding that the proponents of Riverway Villa will grant to the County a ten -foot easement through the property located between the Riverway Villa P.U.D. and the Spokane River. It is our understanding that this easement will be located as far from the project as economically feasible and that motorized vehicles will be prevented from using the pathway. It is our further understanding that should the County decide to not pursue the development of a bike path for financial or other reasons, the easement will expire in ten years time, and finally, that the residents of the Riverway Villa P.U.D. shall have full use of that easement, excluding the building of any permanent construction, until such time as the bike path is constructed. RKA:cr cc: Jim Etter Walt Hedlund Ver y o ERSON RECEIVED ARK DEPARTMENT • JAMES S. CRAVEN HUGH O. EVANS ROGER K ANDERSON HUGH T. LACKIE ROBERT 8. HENDERS0N JAROLD P. CARTWRIGHT CONSTANCE D. GOULD WILLA.RD J. SHARPE of counsel 1170 SEAFIRST FINANCIAL CENTER_ WEST 601 RIVERSIDE AVENUE SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99201 (509)747-3021 4 0 . . j? SPOKANE COUNTY CALCULATION SHEET OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS Project No.: Igo- Title: Sheet Description: Z.IJEt(u Calc. by: Checked y Notes: Reference Date: zrqb b Date: NMI la I RIM MEM ••••••••••••• 1MSD LS Celculatl of t.' ( ■■■■■■■■■■■ t a� ■ ••. ■■.1 ■ ■ p - 1 1 1111111H1II1 .■.•■I. r •••••• , q_E. ■•.•••••••• •••••1•1111 i 0011•111 ■■ • ■ ■1 MIME ■I• mss rw ✓6L4m><+ - , ' ` a _ - 0 4 p - so En ■1■■■i1 •111■ • _��C Z I- 1 1 ■ r • 110 111..1 ies:5 u-i.jfr-d - 0 Nn _T4f11' b r Ib eeuf?4 51'%11 r2- r L 9(i.- 1110 Milli i R6- f It dil : 4 ' l ■.i■■�anTa 111111 e _, ! ua 6 1 I ■ I IINIIHh 1 M■■= I I ■■ En ■1 ■ ■1■■ ■■1..111■ MEMO Y) fan er 641 ■■ l G jil;c es MIME ■■■ ..flit■. 46 O L]1 • •••• ■ ....■■■. ■■ ■I■■■ e6 t IRc � ISP +mss .■■■.■■ ■• 1■ ■■ ■ ■ • • ••• ■11 .■■■ ■ • 1• • ••• — •11.. ■ ■■• .■ ■1•.■■■ ■1 • fl.l ■. s • es Y. hn.., 1111 11.1...• ■11■■■ i I A-44 to thnivw ^Sep ■■ •■■1 •■I••• I • • ■■ ■11■■• •• (q_11 4 p_4 »- 15••••••• 1 ■■ ■■■E. 1 •••• Ml1 •••••• ■■■ 1••••• i III ■■ ■■■■ 1.11. Lowe£ bow(_ n al _d (tAt c 4 r �G ldtku.c1_ lY ! y) 11 ■■ l■■ ■.I 1 r I MINN • �••I•• auk la g tai' x 4- t1■ ■1••••11 11111111111111111111 11111111111 ■ ■ ■••i.. n a • ■1 . . � 1 1 .. . ■ ■■ 111111.111....„1...1 l ••• ingigmm ■ ■■■■■I..■■.■. ■. ■1111.. ■ ■■■ 1111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ■■■111 •••••••••• •••••••• 11 ■ ■1■. ■■ 09: 36141 SPOIL DEPT OF BLDG OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER /EMI SOS 1026 W. BROAD SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 PERMIT TO PERFORM WORK ON COUNTY ROAD RIGHT -O W E� Ciia CAMERON 06 1995 CAMERON ON CONTRACTING, INC 3309 B gK AVE SPOKANE WA 99205 -740 466-55 The applicant hereby applies for permission to CONSTRUCT CURB AND GUTTER ON INDIANA FOR RIVERWALK PHASE I old.` + +* ut«on .county +roads +withn asphalt *lean +than+ 5M years **e l*o ++ *NO o cuts on **** * * * *** +t * * * * * *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *t * • JUN 06 '95 i lliat-1:2- /16,/ Date Q7 1995 wok to start 4 JUN Q7 The a timatedtime re uired for completion o h above work a 30 days • the and Speed with due which t e pt ri ggg t ag me ea pr a on en ih all of he public. regard or the rights, ntereets and conveniences o tFi p Petitioner further agrees to perform the work In strict compliance with the provisions enumerated below and states that he has read and undersigned gu that ti1 general e backprovisions rll, s treet surfacing or improvement fails within h two years from the date of final inspection by Spokane County, he shall pay the oast of the County for making repairs or restoration yy the roadway and Of Spokane and any of � icbror e plo ether h Il be saved o eeobpheapp cant f r om a nylr b nsibil lose o raperty,havpe happening PD or damage to persons or property, happen or oo0urring maybe aatne proximate result of any of the work undertaken under the terrns of hereby e t su ed l by the applicant. It is further' agreed that II an part of this e installation interfees future use of the highway by the general public It must by teo+oved or relocpted es designated by the engiinneeeeer / at the expense expense of the permitlee or his successor In interest. W g `� , " t - 6 - 6 • • 9_5-- 2a 1 N = . : ::: :C. : : : :gEBMIT • Subject to all the terms, condrt or printed below or on any part of thia form. g P �t ERMIISSION 1S HEREBY GRANTED the above applicant tot �p� FIL E IN COUNTY I T O LC HEC K FORMSAPRIORETOPPOURON 18 HOUR ADVANCE NOTICE REQ • ' R SI " AWARE.•THATsp E SNT�RC0 r� � y' uK P RAMyJ�EBSRANDVACCEPKQ N REESPONSIBILIT�++I+SH THE FIN THE GRADE NECES MATS AiQY ,CRANGES -ON 'THE' CURB & TERTRAPP CONTROL PER MUTCD. ALL STREET COMPL IANCE WITH THESAPPROVEDD PLANCONNSFIILE IN SURVEYOR VCOUNHUNT COMPACT 92% MAXIMUM DENSI YUU USING STANDARD COUNTY METHODS IS REQUIR UNDER SITE A LL JOB ORR CMENT TO RB AND N COUNTY APPROVED PLANS ST Total _$ BILL Paid by CH # A bo nd lee $ 10 Intpoct }on o issued ti CONTRACTING, is boo n red amount of mp with tie above conditions said bond to be key i ed eo and compliance in �u� r f$rce an, n effect �or a perio of 2 years following completion o wo: ay.0 orize, by this pperms • This permit Shall bt 07 1995 the work herein contemplated shall have been INSPECTION REQUIRED —24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED Call Permit Office 456 -3600 to notify when work begins and schedule inspection. COUNTY E jNEE `, / .+ / \ DATE 06/0695 N- , d /,!�? /I'i/ s liebla to In ur or BY tn, •• bill the �opli .f t to notify all utilities and private property owners when suchproperty' I Y o the damage thr. � gh the psrf en�Of the above work and the applicant make all necessary arrangements relative e e tot protection of such prope an. /or utilities. Traffic control signing and barricades shall be furnished by Permian conformance with Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ". ThIa pe rmit must be avallebte oh the work site end is valid P.1 JUN -14 -95 WED 05:15 er INLAND ASPHALT CO JUN 13 '95 PERMIT JUN 13 1995 INLAND ASPHALT PO B 534 -2657 09 :17AM SPOKANE DEPT OF BLDG OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W. BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 PHONE (600) 456 -3600 TO PERFORM WORK ON COUNTY ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY CO #64331 Permit # 95 - EAB110 WA 99220 993 -0556 The applicant hereby applies for permission to CRUSHED ROCK AND ASPHALT PAVING FOR RIVERWALK PHASE I 1 . , h%099229144 P.1 P.0 ** t**** t*********************** t*** t** * * * * * * * ** * * * ** * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * k-APPLI CAN T. -BPS -AWARE THAT THERE ARE NO PPROVED STRE & D p N E r * • * Sr AGREES TO HOLD SPOKANE' C UNTY HARML Ss &' Q irs- ALTeem wo " y * * SHOULD' THE FINAL GRADE NEC AfITATE' CHAN ON HE ROCK & - ASP * *t* ** * * *** * * * ** ** * * * ** * * * *** i ********* t ** t* t******************* ** ** ** * * * * ** *** ******* * * ** ** * ** *No cuts on county roads with asphalt leas than 5 years old.* *** * ** * * * ** * * * ** * * * * * * * ***** ** * **t * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** *x * *+ * * * * ** ** �43/9s' esa - R4l/ - 1A f /o u/ SI i S, 6 A o� a �i2v The estimated time requiced for comppl of k to a bove work i 30 days which the petitioner agrees to eroseciite with all dileg and speed with due regard for the rights, iinterest and conveniences of tAe public. Petitioner further agrees to perform the work in strict compliance with the provisions enumerated below and states that 110 has read and will adhere to the general provisions applicable to permits contained on the reverse side of this form. The undersigned guarantees That if the backlit'. street surfacing or improvement fails within two years from the date of final inspection by Spokane County, he shall pay the cost of the County for making reoalrs or restoration of the rnotlw,v ,rid imnrnvnmontq In ean.fAn...n___..,.. a .__ , .., ,,,,. penny %,,,a,dr,� tq f7,eappnvanttnat met:ounley 01 6 okaneand any officer orempl ovee thereof shall en 12116A ka,n,laee by is. •ppf..nt from (my aawtty ur rc.wmsiolnty for am accident, lose or aamage to persons or property, happening or occurring as the proximate result of any of the work undertaken under the terms el this application and the permit or permits which maybe granted in response thereto, and that all of said liabilities are hereby assumed by the applicant. It is twiner agreed that if any Dart of this in lotion interferes with the future use of the highway by the general pa ! nu .retrocatedasdesgnat7 1 sang' eer attheexpenseof thepermitter or his successor in Inter.•.,: / Ik anommrstar • z :•'•'•'•'•'• •'•:•PERMIT Subject to all tho terms, conditions: drib bro■fsidna Written or printed below or on any •art of this form. PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED the above applicant to: PERFORM WORK TO COUNTY STANDARDS. p � APPLICANT IS AWARE THAT THE STREET PLANS FOR RIVERWALK PHASE I ARE NOT FI AND AGREES TO HOLD SPOKANE COUNTY HARML SS AND ACCEPTS ALL RESPO B LITY SHOULD THE FINAL GRADE NECESSITATE ANY VING. TRAFFIC GES•ON THE ROCK & ASP PPPPPPA $g C p O p NN gT T T ROL PER MUTCD. COMPA T I SHALL ON COMPACTED S TEPB TO IIIED F THE INTHECUAR ENTE AS OP DETERMINED BY WASHINGTON STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION OR AS DIRECTED BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER. 'ermit fee $ 10 Inspection fee $ REIMBURSED Total $ BILL Paid by CH # bond in he amount of 55000 issued to INLAND ASPHALT CO in is re��ired to i sure ompli nce with the above conditions said b nd to b kept t so r ized r by an fora per of 2 year following complet o r work :omple 14 11 9 9n r leas the work herein contemplated shall. have been INSPECTION REQUIRED — 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED r, it Office 458 -3600 to notify when work begins and schedule Inspection. .e• Call P COUNTY E BY r - 'frail r. 06/13/95 11 isthereaponsibilfty atthea pn lys�,tp4i DATE t v s ndprivateptgpatty such properly is liable t0 Injury or demaytathrough the performance ot theabove work and ftiaa..- n....r,._:.__,._ ____ JUL -05 -1995 16:47 INLAND PACIFIC ENG July 5, 1995 Mr. Todd Whipple Inland Pacific Engineering 707 West 7th, Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 Via Facsimile: Dear Todd: This is to confirm that we gave you permission to sign on our behalf in the "Developer Approval Block" for submission of River Walk to Spokane County. Sincerely, w Stanton - Spokane Limited Partnership Stanton Development Company General Partner By Brian Housley Stanton - Spokane Limited Partnership 16720 Northeast 116th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 (206) 869-8618 P.01 Postat' Fax Note Mr. Michael Hunt North Idaho Engineering 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 Dear Mr. Hunt: HCI Howard Consultants, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers & Geologists W. 280 Prairie Avenue, Coeur d'Alene. 1n 83814 208- 772 -2428 Fax 208 -772 -9968 July 18, 1994 Project No. C3661 -0110 RE: Pavement Design Villa Avenue Riverway Villa Spokane, Washington �c4 RECEIVED DEC 12 1994 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER At your request and authorization, we have performed a pavement and thickness design analysis for Villa Avenue at the Riverway Villa subdivision in Spokane, Washington. The scope of our services included "R" -value analysis of subgrade soil samples and determining pavement section thickness based on the laboratory testing and the Spokane County roadway classification. Four samples of the subgrade soils were supplied to Howard Consultants, Inc. by North Idaho Engineering. The samples were reported to have been obtained at approximate proposed subgrade elevation for Villa Avenue; three feet below existing grade. The locations of the samples are indicated on the attached site schematic. The "R"- values of the selected soil samples were assessed in general accordance with AASHTO T -190 and the values ranged from 64 to 78. The lab form graphical plots are attached to this letter. We performed our pavement section thickness analysis using the AASHTO 1986 pavement design computer program. Our analysis is based on the laboratory "R" -value testing and the Spokane County Roadway Classification Traffic Index TI =5 - collector arterial /local access for Villa Avenue. The "R "- values were correlated to WSDOT "R "- values and then to CBR values based on Figure FF.6. supplied to Howard Consultants, Inc. by Spokane County. Our analysis generally•indicates a pavement section of two inches of asphalt concrete underlain by 4 inches of crushed based course to be adequate for a design life at 20 years. However, the minimum pavement section required by Spokane County is 2 inches of asphaltic concrete underlain by 6 inches of crushed base course. It is our opinion that the Spokane County minimum section will perform quite adequately when placed on compacted subgrade substantially similar to the soil samples tested. We hope this provides you with the information necessary to proceed with your project. Please do not hesitate to give us a call if you have any questions. DEP /km HCI Sincerely, Howard Consultants, Inc. Derek E. Pohle, E.I.T. Geotech ica Engineer Chris C. Beck P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Consulting Geotechnical Engineers & Geologists Riverway Villa - Pavement Design Project No. C3661 -0110 Page 2 uJ )- ‹ w -J Howard Consult ants, Inc. PLATE ROJECT DENT it UBMITTED BY TATION EST HOLE SPTH ECHANICAL ANAL. % PASS 2" 100 40 SO 3/ b4 1/2" 52 3/8" 41 4 25 Rebatched -1" 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 8 e 07.1:% 12106 Riverway Villa C1 -STSO Howard Consultants HCI \ v e O O o O 0 0 O o O 0 W h 'D N a n h .-1 Z 208 376 6201 REPORT OF TESTS OM SOIL 0 S g DRY DENSITY 0 aLBB. /CF 8 8 Reviewed By Consulting Geotechnlcal Engineers & Geologists 7449 Lemhi Sircct, Bolsc, ID 83709 208 - 376 -8200 Fax 208.376 -8201 INVOICE 4 941657C LAB 4 966784 FILE 4 84 'SOURCE SAMPLED BY Howard Consultants DATE SAMPLED 6 - - DATE RECIEVED MOISTURE DENSITY CURVE AASHTO DESIGNATION T99 METHOD MAX. DRY HT. 4 /CU.FT. OPT.M0 ST T MOISTURE IN PERCENT THIS REPORT COVERS ONLY MATERIAL AS REPRESENTED BY THIS SAMPLE AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY COVER ALL BOIL FROM THIS LAYER OR SOURCE. /ead V+ Howard Consultants, Inc. ESCRIPTION OF SOIL Silty Gravel SOIL CONSTANTS PIPE DATA LIQUID LIMIT pH RESISTIVITY OH21.CH. 1 1/2a PLASTIC LIMIT 1 PLASTICITY INDEX REMARY.S SPEC GRAVITY ( +3/4 ") • No EXP'Prensure Recorded SPEC GRAVITY ( -NO 4) SAND EQUIVALENT "R" VALUE 72 EXP PRESSURE, PSI 0 • UNIFIED CLASS TRAFFIC INDEX T - .....•.■............ .................... ..........•......... ..................•. .fl....... f........ ......N.... �... .................... .............f..... ........■... ■....... •....■...■...■...M .........11 ......... .........•...•...... .................... •ROJECT Riverway Villa DENT *2 ;uBHITTED BY Howard Consultant■ C1 1130 TATION 12 'EST HOLE .EPTH •ESCRIPTION OF SOIL Silty Gravel Rebatched -1" 0 0 r 0 N 0 .4 8 n 0 0 e 1 7 csG 0 O m O 0 w HCI e 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to an v n PI -+ Consulting Geotechnical Engineers & Geologists 7444 Lemhl Street, Boise. ID 83709 208.176 -8200 Fax 208 -376 -8201 REPORT OF TESTS ON SOIL LAB 1 946785 FILE 1 84 -61 SOURCE T_CHANICAL ANAL. t PASS SOIL CONSTANTS PIPE DATA 3" 160 LIQUID LIMIT pH RESISTIVITY 2" 95 PLASTIC LIMIT 1 1/2" 89 PLASTICITY INDEX REMARKS 1" 80 SPEC GRAVITY ( +3/4 ") • No EXP Preeeure Recorded 3/4" 73 SPEC GRAVITY ( -NO 4) 1/2" 63 SAND EQUIVALENT 3/8" SS "R" VALUE 78 4 35 EXP PRESSURE, P81 0 e UNIFIED CLASS TRAFFIC INDEX T 0 S e 8 0 8 N Howard Consultants, Inc. INVOICE t 941657 SAMPLED BY Howard Consultants DATE SAMPLED DATE RECIEVED 0 8 DRY DENSITY g LDS. /cr MOISTURE DENSITY CURVE PASHTO DESIGNATION T99 METHOD MAX. DRY WT. I /CU.FT. OPT.MOIST Reviewed By OFD4 . cm. MOISTURE IN PERCENT THIS REPORT COVERS ONLY MATERIAL AS REPRESENTED BY THIS SAMPLE AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY COVER ALL 80IL FROM THIS LAYER OR SOURCE. 40JECT Rlvarway VI11a )ENT t3 CL1150 .!EMITTED BY Howard Consultants rATION 43 SST HOLE S ?TH SCRIPTION OF SOIL 611ty Gravel CHANICAL ANAL. % PASS SOIL CONSTANTS 100 LIQUID LIMIT 1 1/2" 100 PLASTIC LIMIT 91 PLASTICITY INDEX .T/4" 82 SPEC GRAVITY ( *3/4") 1/2" 66 SPEC GRAVITY ( - 4) 3/8" 56 SAND EQUIVALENT 36 "R" VALUE 70 EXP PRESSURE, PSI 0 UNIFIED CLASS TRAFFIC INDEX Rsbatchad 0 0 0 v a 0 0 0 0 m HCI 1 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 m n 0 0 0 n Consulting Geotechntcal Engineers & Geologists 7444 Lemhl Street, Bolsc. ID 83709 208. 376' -8200 Fax 208-376-8201 REPORT OT TESTS ON SOIL LAB 1 946786 INVOICE 1 941657 FILE 4 84 -61 SOURCE SAMPLED BY Howard Consultants DATE SAMPLED DATE RECIEVED 6 -27 -94 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r DRY o DENSITY 0 0LBS. /CF 0 8 n 8 0 8 Howard Consultants, Inc. PIPE DATA pH RESISTIVITY REMARKS * No EXP Freseur° Recorded T -8 ROILowed By MOISTURE DENSITY CURVE AASHTO DESIGNATION T99 METHOD MAX. DRY WT. t /CU.FT. OPT.MOIST OHM. CM. MOISTURE IN PERCENT THIS REPORT COVERS ONLY MATERIAL AS REPRESENTED BY THIS SAMPLE AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY COVER ALL SOIL FROM THIS LAYER OR SOURCE. .ROJECT Riverway Villa DENT 14 CL 1150 .UBMTTTED BY Howard Consultants TATION EST HOLE 14 EPTH ESCR1PTION OF SOIL icMANICAL ANAL. it PASS 6" 2" 1 1/2" 1 ° 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" 4 Rebatched -1 e 0 0 0 PI H N ;; a co N m a � y 0 O H = xa t4 11 0 0 0 N 0 N 0 8 0 0 0 e I 0 en 0 w 0 n 100 93 88 72 59 53 45 40 29 Silty Gravel HCI REPORT OF TESTS ON SOIL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 § 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ga u t4 en n, ti DRY ,DENSITY §LBS. /CF Howard Consultants, Inc. Consulting Gcorcchnical Engineers & Geologists 7444 Lcmhl Street. Boise. ID 83709 208 - 376 - 8200 Fax 208.376.8201 INVOICE 1 941657 LAB 1 946787 FILE 1 84 -61 SOURCE SAMPLED BY Howard Consultants DATE SAMPLED DATE RECIEVED 6 -27 -94 SOIL bf 7rANTs PIPE DATA LIQUID LIMIT pH RESISTIVITY OHM.CM. PLASTIC LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX REMARKS SPEC GRAVITY ( +3/4' • No EXP Pressure Recorded SPEC GRAVITY ( -NO 4) SAND EQUIVALENT "R" VALUE 64 EXP PRESSURE, PSI 0 • UNIFIED CLASS TRAFFIC INDEX T -8 ■ •■■ ■■■■■■■■■US■■■ ■ MI / ■■■ ■■■■■■M III ■■ ■ ■1111111 ■ ■ ■�� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■MIN ■■■■ ■■■■ ■ ■ MIS ■ ■■U = I ■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■■ III NMI ■■■f■■■ ■ ■l ■■■■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■. MINIM ■■■ MIN ■e ■■■■A ■■■■■■■■■■ N■ ■■■■ III III ■ III l■■ ■■■ ■■■■ ■■ ■ ■ ■■■ III ■■■ ■■f III NMI Ell ■■■■■■■N■■ MI MI ■ ■ ■ ■ ■. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ /■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■Ell III III ■ ■■■■ MIME M OM 111•111 all 1011M ■. ■ ■■■a ■■ mo THIS REPORT COVERS ONLY MATERIAL AS REPRESENTED BY THIS SAMPLE AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY COVER ALL SOIL FROM THIS LAYER OR SOURCE. Reviewed Hy MOISTURE DENSITY CURVE AASHTO DESIGNATION T99 METHOD MAX. DRY WT. 1 /CU.FT. OPT.MOIST MOISTURE IN PERCENT /rid,/ 2.0 6.0 4.0 50 4.0 + x 0 x 0 -6 a 10 l6 '20 40,000 - 20000... 10,000 ,000 6000 -7000 • 6000 6000 4000 500 2000 1 ( ) The tarr•l•tlern 1c with the detl(n curve. eared by CslIfnrnit: AASI10 de.lgnatloo Is T-11)-60, and exudation ',movie 10 2 pot. See Il■evw, I.M., end C.r.•ny, l.M.. The f•ctote Ih,derlyIns the Rational M eltn of f•v.vnta." froc. MU . Vol. 25 (1146) pp. 101 -116. (2) The cortelatlon 11 with the de•lgn curve. used by v•ehiniton Dept. of Highways; exudation 'tenure le )00 pti. See "Flexible l•.•.ent Devlin Correl•tlon Study." HU lull. Ill (1156). (3) The Cow tatlon 10 with the Chi design curves developed by Kentucky. See Drab*, V.I., and N J.N., - 1e- Cr.luatioet of Kentucky Flexible faveoent Design Ctl terlon." KU 1u11. 1)) (1151) pp. )) -56. The follow- ing condition. apply to the 1•boratoty-•ed1(Ied CTlI eptttexen it to be oolded it Or :nut th. op tie o ael• tut. content a dettr.Ined by AASI10 T -11; dyntale eo..pactton Is to be utd with • h..oer (g1 t f 10 lb dropped (fop t height of 16 In.; specie-en la to bt eoeptcttd In five eiu.l 1.1*t0 vlth each layer r•celyin1 10 blew•: •pecl.+n 1• to het soaked for 4 int. (4) Thl• scald h•• been developed by coopari•on between Rho Call(ornta R -e•lve and the Croup 1nd.r determined by the procedure (a froc. KR] vol. 11 (1145) pp. )76 -792. Figure FF.6. Correlation chart for estimating soil ._ support._. (1)_ __... _._.. . R:th.encj Jf I— ft Cciculciionn _� ' ?o, 03 —j I__ - 1 1 1 L I!_t.S 11 t_wl 7s 4. Pe? I 1 L _ _L. ILLI_L_ Li I 64 T + t r � '_ I I 1 1 f I 1Y15 ob ilk t 1 890 Hob ' T _ i I - 3 1 Or.->7.c>2. t _01f5,21 bez5, 1 ¢ I_ L- ETT L 1 I Li - I T I1` L_- -I i f-fl y /. Zo 1 ". ` 1()g C1 n -i P L_ C f� (LILT r 1 i 7 FIT r Li -I 5�? / l T� � � J L! 1_ L- r C P1 ❑ r , L_ P1 L [ , Ll r I r L- Li P1 L 1 L SPOKANE COUNTY OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS CALCULATION SHEET Description: /r "Mrs Project No Calc by Date: Title• ]- rb.,rvr- Checked by: Date: Sheet of Notes: SPOKANE COUNTY CALCULATION SHEET OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS Description: TOW itatijS Project No.: Coic by Date: - AM/094A_ Az Checked by: Date: t of Notes: co cuic'!aoz, � 1 iti �d 1 h� — 4 { fdTt7 � 1 L ' LJ ; ' —� L_I ± '1— + U .4_ - 1 1 �� 1---1_ _ 2oz5 + - - - - - /a...) +- + I � . - • - + -� , — H I -- - -I - -1 u y �? _ f 6 ±21, ( I6.W , 1¢3 } -y - 1 } } r - - -t 1 --: -I t 1 of 3 - 75 -r t I I Itv(� j 25�25.16 I N -tz : L�I io C�1 ✓ 1 4, _ Y _ fi t ✓L+va ✓2f2L 0 / 1 L ✓zf8�8 r (- (Z5 L_ Z{ L_ t CQ ... ✓"¢&Z.42 q t , L -- L_ --r 45f5f.16' : ¢ II +fo.78 ?4t,l.2f I a z5 r \ ° l z 5 : : t C - ✓p(te v79, -66 78 : , 5-i-( - : L_1_ :: � `.t 64. 7 - C!_ 5-+c5 r I I 91-6745 [1 r- Mall E 1 : P1 SPOKANE COUNTY CALCULATION SHEET OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS Description: TOW itatijS Project No.: Coic by Date: - AM/094A_ Az Checked by: Date: t of Notes: File name is INDIANA.COR FILE NAME: INDIANA.COR GRADE Station Elevation Grade Distance - 2.00000 100.00 0 +00.00 2027.95 0 +25.00 2027.45 0 +50.00 2026.95 0 +75.00 2026.45 1 +00.00 2025.95 VERTICAL CURVE Station Elevation PI Station 100.00 PI Elevation 2025.95 Entry Grade -2.00000% Exit Grade 0.80000% Length 100.00 PC 0 +50.00 0 +75.00 1 +00.00 1 +25.00 PT 1 +50.00 High /Low point is• 1 +21.43 GRADE Station Grade Distance 0 +56.48 0 +68.99 1 +16.00 1 +46.01 1 +00. 1 +25. 1+50. --71+75. - -2 +00. _-,2 +25. 2 +50. -272+75. --°7 3 +0 0 . --3+25. 3 +50. -9 3 +75 4 +00. 4 +25. 4 +50. 2026.95 2026.54 2026.30 2026.24 2026.35 Elevation + - ° 1 17116,4 = eL -. k- r C S . r /S'� t -t, / 4- stjtle DATE: 1 16 1995 2026.24 " V5,75 2026.83116%/ 2026.t4. ZO"w 2026. Dv./ .SS (25.87P rw+i4 2026.32'/y 2586 (2 lf}$'rated d 0'.80000 600.00 00 2025.95 00 2026.15 00 2026.35 00 2026.55 t t ZGeI (34- c7P444*.44 / 00 2026.75FL' z6.ab -�•z7 pvv 0 t)✓ 00 2026.951 n.6.4o (0G.(7/0/ 00 2027.15 00 2027.35%/ter.' r %1f (w -77 ,1Vmd? 00 2027.55T/ t: 27igt (Z7 -0, arogl, 00 2027.75g =27.2' pisteve4;04/ 00 2027.95 s� (Z1,7 y 00 2028.15 Mc-4m 27 ` 00 2028.35 00 2028.55 00 2028.75Ft_ ZB.0 (28,t7tvimAid/✓ I(44 rz4 9 +25.00 2028.95x- 44 -6' 7)✓ 9 +50.00 2028.75 9 +75.00 2028.55&- SA ag.r9) 10 +00.00 2028.35 10+25.00 2028.15 10+50.00 2027.9511- 27. 46 (27f17�'� 10 +75 .00 2027.75t.n. CO') (17.37)✓ 11 +00.00 2027.55 11 +25.00 2027.35 66 �7�d 11 +50.00 2027.15k u" 11 +66.21 2027.02/ 9 +63.70 2028.641t 1644 `Zg.Gr)✓ 9 +65.21 2028. 63 Dv/ x.27 (0.23)d 10 +01.20 2028.34 51 ✓ 10 +21.06 2028.18D ( PiAmr . X4 4,) 1 10+38.70 1 +54.00 2027. Di" Lute 11+54.00 11 +61.20 2027.06 � 24.10 (27. ° �')K 4 +75.00 2028 5 +00.00 2029 5 +25.00 2029 5 +50.00 2029 5 +75.00 2029 6 +00.00 2029 6 +25.00 2030 6 +50.00 2030 6 +75.00 2030 7 +00.00 2030 2 +21.01 2026 2 +88.00 2027 4 +29.00 2028 4 +35.00 2028 4 +79.29 2028 4 +90.78 2029 5 +29.55 2029 5 +59.16 2029 5 +62.42 2029 5 +64.47 2029 5 +66.56 2029 5 +67.95 2029 5 +68.51 2029 ra 6 +25.00 2030 VERTICAL CURVE Station Elevation PI Station 700.00 PI Elevation 2030.75/ Entry Grade 0.80000°% Exit Grade - 0.80000°% Length 100.00 PC 6 +50.00 6 +75.00 7 +00.00 7 +25.00 PT 7 +50.00 High /Low point is: 7 +00.00 2030.55 6 +65.00 2030.45 '.kft (x'07)1 GRADE Station Grade Distance Elevation .95 .15 .35 .55 .75 .95 .15 .35 .55 .75/ .92 r /6u-, c 26.W2G. ".4 pvr^4i/ ✓ .45g2" 2&f ' p .2( aa' I .58 =t&.22 iwm .63Fk 1 .�4 1 1/ . 9 8rot Z G,94 (Zr ✓ .08 .39 St (2..3 .62Pw 2f. 02 , 0 ✓ .65.a 24.r' (it e ery .67R. t?-l& (vid,P)✓ .68 r0 2!, . 6 9 Vw 0.33 (7r4 2) ✓ .70 M- 24.2' (ti -v4° .15 R 7h. FG (7il. 2030.35, ,2)� 2030.50t(¢ ° 30' 2030.55 vl ✓ 2030.50R 3041 ( 2030.35 - 0.80000 466.21 7 +00.00 2030.75 7 +25.00 2030.55 7 +50.00 2030.35 1 7+75.00 2030.153 1 75 lf°9'17)d 8 +00.00 2029.95 8 +25.00 2029.75 Ft 24.16 (24 8 +50.00 2029.55 i �J 8 +75.00 2029.35 ti-w- lb41 9 +00.00 2029.15 File name is INDIAN.COR FILE NAME: INDIAN.COR File name is INDIANA.COR FILE NAME: INDIANA.COR VERTICAL CURVE Station Elevation PI Station 100.00 PI Elevation 2025.95 Entry Grade - 2.00000°% Exit Grade 0.80000% Length 100. 0 0 PC 0 +50.00 20266 0 +60.00 2026.76 0 +70.00 2026.61 0 +80.00 2026.48 0 +90.00 2026.37 1 +00.00 2026.30 1 +10.00 2026.25 1 +20.00 2026.24 1 +30.00 2026.25 1 +40.00 2026.28 PT 1 +50.00 2026.35 High /Low point is: 1 +21.43 2026.24 0 +56.48 0 +68.99 1 +16.00 2026.83 2026.62 f,l4' 2&7& 2026.24 DATE: 1/16/1995 DATE: 1/16/1995 North Idaho Engineering, Inc. W. 4 Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene ID 83814 Attn.: James Morris RE: Riverwav Villa First Addition Dear James. Sincerely, Frank Meland. Construction Coordinator Washington Water Power Please feel free to contact me at 509 -482 -4270 should you have any questions regarding this matter or if I can be of further assistance. U\ID The Washington Water Power Company P.O. Box 3727 Spokane. Washington 99220 (509) 489-0500/ 1 -800- 727 -9170 SERVING EASTERN WASHINGTON AND NORTHERN IDAHO WITH ELECTRICITY AND NATURAL GAS November 1, 1994 Enclosed is the Staking Cop./ for the above referenced property. 1 have highlighted the points we need identified just prior to installation of our electric and as facilities. We need these points staked with the offsets indicated to edge of asphalt (or sidewalk if applicable) with grade to top of the edge of asphalt (or top of the back of sidewalk). Our electrical transformer pads and handholes will be set level to top of edge of asphalt or sidewalk. Stakes designated for property corners should designate lot numbers on the stakes. Radius points are also indicated. Jim Hedberg indicated we might use some of the existing stakes at the site. I would be wiling to meet with your surveyors and Jim to discuss this. P(4(+ RECEIVED DEC 1t1994 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEEP. Spokane County Engineering 1026 W. Broadway Ave Spokane, WA 99260 Attn.: Ed Parry RE: Rivenvay Villa Dear Mr. Parry, Frank Meland Construction Coordinator cc: James Morris / Washington Water Power October 26, 1994 James Morris from North Idaho Engineering (NIE) requested that I contact your office regarding Rivenvay Villa. I am in the process of finalizing the design for the first phase of 37 Lots. NIE requested that \VWP install facilities for an additional 4 lots at the south end of Harmony. I understand that improvements to Barker Road will be done at a later time. VVWP will have extensive work to move a main overhead feeder trunk line along this route. Please feel free to call me at 482-4270 if you have any questions. Sincerely, \ im The Wasningmn Prater Power Company P O. Boa 3727 Spokane. Wasnmgton 99220 • iG9 1 8S -0500 SERVING EASTSR:J W;:g Ir:GT0N AND NORTHERN :DAHO WITH ELECTRICITY ANC NATUPAL G ?3 NCH. RECEIVED DEC 111994 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINE EP PAY TO THE ORDER OF -zpioc k11E Coa,u 1 A FOR GL,4N ep / FJ / ' ✓ II 00 11971" 1:.1 23.1037161: 46.104 303 'NORTH IDAHO ENGINEERING, INC. W. 4200 SELTICE WAY SUITE 2 COEUR D'ALENE, IDAHO 83814 (208) 667 -1171 BANK OF AMERICA COEUR D'ALENE BRANCH 688 401 FRONT AVENUE C6700 COEUR D'ALENE, ID 83814 -R'ECE:H PT . Date I 1 Z 7IZ-- 1 Ivo. Received 1\1,1(37`1 �� �( ic ':� Address T 1)6C( (1 /J cps - i - ) [H r uftfs Dollars $ I$ 1197 171/1231 19 t0 DOLLARS To: North Idaho Engineering, Inc. 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208) 664 -3507 Spokane County Engineering Dept. Ref: Riverwalk First Addition TRANSMITTAL Date: 12/9/94 Attn: Ed Parry, P.E. From: James 0. Morris We are transmitting * Status * Job no. 4 0 0 4 X Herewith Proposed For Information Separate Cover Preliminary As requested Via Mail ' In Progress Your Files X Delivery X Revised Your Submittal Personal Pickup X Final Checking Fedex As -built X Approval UPS For Payment Your Use Other Partial Other The Following Specific Items: 2 Sets Revised Plans (Marked in color) Drawings Calculations Report X Letter Maps Check $ 90.00 Plans X See at Right Curb grade worksheets R -value report 3- Design Deviation requests W /Check $90. Letter from Fire Dist. #1 on cul -de -sacs 2 Letters (WWP) showing utility coordination Original RedLines Please Message: Call immediately Call after review X Call, if questions ;° r? tl Respond in writing X Process your end Forward as Regd. Review /Comment No action Regd. By: Calculations (2 Copies) REview response DEC 1 2 1994 SPUn.,;. „ t .3GINEER May 21, 1997 -T. DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Todd Whipple. P.E. Inland Pacific Engineering Mark Hancock Stanton Development /Dear[ Housely Company 16 N.E. 116th Street Bellevue, WA 98052 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk 1st Addition Pond MI: Submittal Accepted If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry at 456 -3600. Thank you. Sincerely, A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott. P.E., Director William A. Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Edward J. Par •Jr., P.E. Plan Review Engineer encls: Plans (l set) cc: project file revieven W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3479 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 Gentlemen: We have conducted a general evaluation of your recent submittal for this project, and we find that this submittal appears to rueet the minimum standards of the Spokane Cotnuy Standards for Rona and Sewer Construction ( "Standards "). We are therefore able to accept your construction plans and drainage calculations for this project. I am enclosing a blackline print and a mylar of your approved road and drainage plans for this project: the originals are on tile at the Public Works Department. The approved drainage report is also on file at the Public Works Department. This approval is valid until May 21, 1999. If the facilities are not constructed by that date, you may request an extension of the acceptance for an additional two years: the plans shall be revised prior to granting the extension. Please note: I. The County's acceptance of this submittal does not relieve the sponsor or his agents from any liability related to portions of the design that are not in conformance with the Standards, or which do not follow good engineering practice. 2. All permits and notifications necessary prior to construction are the responsibility of the project sponsor and/or his assigned agents: and 3.Cotstruction documentation and certified Record Drawings are required prior to the release of any surety for Construction Engineering. Parry, Ed From: Parry, Ed Sent: Monday, May 19, 1997 1:57 PM To: 'Todd Whipple, P.E.' Cc: 'Mark Hancock' Subject: P1414 - Revised 208 calcs for Basin A; Pond M1 mylars; walk- though list Importance: High 1. Revised 208 calcs: The package submitted on May 13 appears to be acceptable. We will file this with the original Drainage calcs. Field work to bring the sideslopes into line will be handled as a separate issue 2. Pond M1 mylars (Sheet 5S) submitted on 16 May look acceptable. The original mylars will also need to be revised by IPEC and re- stamped by the County 3. As we discussed on 12 May, you were going to provide a list of items you wanted me to look at - how's that coming? Page 1 Pos it• Fax 7671 V Dare 4119�► From *al ?-ti � Note � / ^ T o - Ie V''t�1�1R i's:- Co./Dept...lig -'�Y t Co. to. (v. C- rAkte Phone # .1S _ Phone 0 +5 _2; 0D 7b law Fax 0 468 ' � c !� y'�CJ ``KJTT Fax # Parry, Ed From: Parry, Ed Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 1997 4:15 PM To: Todd Whipple, P.E.' Subject: ATTN: Todd Whipple - Riverwalk 1st: New Pond M1 Importance: High Todd: New Lot Plans for that lot are also needed. Please call if you have questions - -Ed Page 1 1o9 /� G 22 L--s The calcs for the new Pond M1 at the NW corner of McMillan Ln /Baldwin Ln appear to be acceptable. Please provide a mylar & 2 print copies of this for the County's stamp; this is needed so that copies can be made and distributed. If you would like a copy, please provide a reproducible for your office. You may either submit a separate sheet for this. or put this detail on another sheet where it fits. I will leave the mylar sets you sent down at the front desk. April 30, 1 IPE W.O. Post -it Fax Note Spokane County Public Works Department Development Engineering Services 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 Attn: Ed Parry, Jr., P.E. Dear Ed: TRW /jdp Enc. RE: Riverwalk 1st Addition (P141.4 -A) New Pond Plan Required on Baldwin. Todd R. Whipple, P.E eering Compan cc: file Mark Hancock, Dean -Deily Company 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509 -458 -6844 1_ - Post -it' Fax Note As we have mentioned, a low point was designed by North Idaho Engineering and constructed by Dean- Housley at the northwest corner of Baldwin & McMillan. Although a low point was designed at this location, no drainage facility was designed to collect the stormwater which would accumulate. This situation requires that a pond be constructed to collect and treat the stormwater at the Baldwin low point. We are recommending that the pond be constructed within the existing drainage and utility easement, so that no additional easements need to be acquired. Enclosed please find the plans for the proposed pond at the northwest corner of Baldwin and McMillan. Also attached is a copy of the basin map and the '208' /Bowstring calculation for the proposed pond. If you are in agreement, we would prefer to modify the record drawing mylars rather than the original mylars after the pond has been successfully constructe Please call with any questions. Thank y u� HIV ,�r Sincerely, Inlandkacific E II` leo - ! . dardad nr CEIVED -„ MAY 0 1 1997 d°J periii SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 - 765 -7784 • FAX: 208 -769 -7277 rxd✓ fa dulbi 4011.00,0*3 NAM ittiviad tea # 1444 DocumemI%JC baldplan PEAK FLOW CALCULATION PROJECT Riverwalk 4th Addition BASIN: New pond on Baldwin Tot. Area Imp. Area C= 0.14 Acres 2480 SF 0.69 Tc = 2.75 min., by Equation 3 -2 of Guidelines 90 ft. Gutter flow Z1 = 3.0 For Z2 Z2 = 3 Type B = 1.0 n = 0.400 Rolled = 3.5 S = 0.015 d = 0.470 ft. A R Q Tc Tc total I Qc 0.66 0.22 0.11 8.94 11.69 2.05 0.20 Qpeak for Case 1 = 0.20 cfs CASE 2 Case 2 assumes a Time of Concentration less than 5 minutes so thpt the peak flow = .90(3.18)(Imp. Area) = 0.16 cfs EXPIRES 9/24/ 1 ON P:1 .ti So, the Peak flow for the Basin is the greater of the two flows, 0.20 cfs BOWSTRING METHOD DETENTION BASIN DESIGN 10 -Year Design Storm Time Increment (min) 5 CASE 1 'j Time of Conc. (min) 11.69 Outflow (cfs) 0.3 45 fL Overland Flow . t O fis Design Year Flow 10 Area (acres) 0.14 Ct = 0.15.x;" "'r' Impervious Area (sq ft) 2480 L = 45 ft. Factor 0.69 n = 0.40 1 208' Volume Provided 153 S = 0.020 =;g 3 ` Area • C 0.097 208' DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Required' 208' Storage Volume = Impervious Area x .5 in / 12 in /ft 208' Storage Volume Provided DRYWELL REQUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN STO Maximum Storage Required by Bowstring Number and Type of Drywells Required PROJECT: Riverwalk 4th Addition BASIN: New pond on Baldwin DESIGNER: J.D.POE DATE: 04/30/97 Time Time Inc. Intens. Q Devel. Vol.ln Vol.Out Storage (min) (sec) (in /hr) (cfs) (cu ft) (cu ft) (cu ft) 11.69 701 2.05 0.20 186 210 -24 5 300 3.18 0.31 123 90 33 <__ 10 600 2.24 0.22 174 180 -6 15 900 1.77 0.17 195 270 -75 20 1200 1.45 0.14 201 360 -159 25 1500 1.21 0.12 203 450 -247 30 1800 1.04 0.10 205 540 -335 35 2100 0.91 0.09 206 630 -424 40 2400 0.82 0.08 209 720 -511 45 2700 0.74 0.07 210 810 -600 50 3000 0.68 0.07 213 900 -687 55 3300 0.64 0.06 219 990 -771 60 3600 0.61 0.06 226 1080 -854 65 3900 0.60 0.06 240 1170 -930 70 4200 0.58 0.06 249 1260 -1011 75 4500 0.56 0.05 256 1350 -1094 80 4800 0.53 0.05 258 1440 -1182 85 5100 0.52 0.05 268 1530 -1262 90 5400 0.50 0.05 272 1620 -1348 95 5700 0.49 0.05 281 1710 -1429 100 6000 0.48 0.05 289 1800 -1511 103 cu ft 153 cu ft 33 cu ft 1 Single 0 Double Stied' (oi-Y &iDW7/V sty/ /z ksc- = /3GD sp d Boa 5-P- go ad -- '3PD s Inland Pacific Engineering West 707 7th, Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 509 458-6840 Fax No. 509 458-6844 4t1c -i/v / ¢ _A- _ 4.4589F 6095 - g - 3 /7 /S SF r id. (Li am ®)( s) fQiwf.IS) _ z0o0 1 6o9 S' t. .69 MEMO ❑ CALC. ❑ MEETING ❑ OTHER ❑ PROJECT RiVeitIM k/ JOB NO. % / SHEET 2- OF ?! BY DATE CHK'D BY DATE J _7 NOTE: ORGANIC CARBON TESTING IS REQUIRED FOR THE TOPSOIL IF THE EDGE OF ASPHALT IS GREATER THAN 0.5' ABOVE SOD DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS 1 ROADWAY EASEMENT V SPECIFIED ON PLAN T 1/ NOT TO SCALE TOP OF BERM ELEV.= TOP OF CURB ELEV. + .20 FT. 3 MAX. 1 1.5" SOD ON TOPSOIL, SOD INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE GRATE ELEVATION MAX. NOTE: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. .4' MIN. .5' -.67' SECTIONAL VIEW TYPICAL "208" POND WITH DRAINAGE STRUCTURE 3:1 (TYP) EDGE OF ASPHALT 1 " -3" TOPSOIL ON GRADED POND BOTTOM GRADED POND BOTTOM 1.11' -1.28' BELOW EDGE OF ASPHALT 1 16' DRNG.A ESMT. I 1 r 1 1 andhNb. al/ 3 MN(. NOTE: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. I INLAND I 1! PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 NOTE: ORGANIC CARBON TESTING 15 REQUIRED FOR THE TOPSOIL IF THE EDGE OF ASPHALT IS GREATER THAN 0.5' ABOVE SOD TYPE A DRYWELL GRATE EL= 2029.75 l ROADWAY EASEMENT SODDED POND BOTTOM EL= 2029.25 6' FLAT POND BOTTOM BALDWIN & MCMILLAN RIVERWALK 1ST. ADDITION P ROPOSED CONSTRUCTION DATE: 04/28/97 LOW POINT AT EDGE OF ASPHALT EL= 2030.25 V (EXPIRES 9/24/ K I / 96106 • • y NEW POND M2 REQUIRED '208' POND VOLUME = 103 CU.FT. DESIGNED '208' POND VOLUME = 153 CU.FT. POND BOTTOM AREA = 239 SQ.FT. \ 16 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ROADWAY EASEMENT _BALDWIN LANE 1� 4' WALK TO HOUSE LOW POINT EA= 2030.25 I f 16' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT I 31• 4.1' 2030.73 PROPOSED FINISHED POND BTM EL.= 2029.25 LANDSCAPING BARK TO BE REMOVED FROM POND AREA RELOCATE EXIST. TREE & SHRUBS AS NECESSARY —STA. 14 +20, 20' LT. INSTALL TYPE A DRYWELL WITH METAL FRAME & GRATE GRATE EL= 2029.75 II I 1 2030.37 EA EDGE OF ASPHALT SCALE: 1" =10' BALDWIN PT = 14481.71 19 +58.83 = MCMILLAN LANE 1 EXPIRES 9/24/1 1 pr INLAND ia PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -8840 Spokane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 BALDWIN & MCMILLAN RIVERWALK 1ST. ADDITION PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION DATE: 04/29/97 April 22, 1997 IPE W.O. #96106 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Spokane County Public Works Department Development Engineering Services 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 Attn: Ed Parry, Jr., P.E. Dear Ed: I re RE: Riverwalk 1st Addition (P1414 -A) Pond Calculations for Pond M Plan Change, New Pond required on Baldwin. MAT 1 11 lAb As,� .dam" 4 S** Enclosed please find the supporting drainage calculations for Pond M you requested to approve the Pond M plan change, and the revised plan correcting the inlet grate height from the pond bottom from 0.8' to 0.67'. `208' volume calculations have been completed and provided based on the 0.67' pond depth. Through the Riverwalk 1' Record Drawing process, it has come to our attention that there is a low point on Baldwin, near McMillan Lane, which reduces the amount of `208' treatment required in Pond M. A basin map is attached showing the area that does not flow to Pond M as originally calculated. This situation requires that a pond be constructed to collect and treat the stormwater at the Baldwin low point. The basin calculations for the low point on Baldwin near McMillan Lane are attached. A new pond M1 will be installed when approved. We are scheduling a survey of the general area of the low point (lot with the landscaped bark) to design the required `208' pond within the existing utility/drainage easement. We will provide you with the new pond plan for Pond M1 as soon as we have the information ourselves. Please call with any questions. Thank you. Since ely, Inlan # Pacific gineering Company Todd R. Whipple, P.E TRW /jdp Enc. cc: file Mark Hancock, Dean -Deily Company 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509 -458 -6840 • FAX: 509 -458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208.765-7784 • FAX: 208 -769 -7277 RECEIVED APR 2 3 1997 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER na•,eu1961061,V1 &Gle \f EXPIRES 9/2 ire West 707 7th, Suite 200 509 458 -6840 ft*- 1 Popot v = 802 96 s P et" L4L a sl& A , v (4 6,0„. w /s) e v./ 1 wa-0. • �►S. '(,3�5� - 43 S' a0(2)" = 261 -1 2z- end .,. - « 11)4 dif C 'C c 411_1- /t/x) �� 1�ute�xeh. 11-0 pond u-t24 da.d-t AIAL . C e p ef f d U - ' , -lt o V 4d 1-1-tizzAO 'Pond rtes c?o5 - O29 y d i-a-,mo t die( c2o esi ' ' X91 z z t c, 1 _- Inland Pacific Engineering Spokane, Washington 99204 Fax No. 509 458 -6844 c' /P7 _ /03. c F Pad !/'7 C4&6 - ook -� aC 33/ if ernd e 33/ - /a3. 9 (MEMO CALC. MEETING ❑ OTHER ❑ PROJECT ae4 ►` �l �t �t� / JOB NO. 9'(0!06 SHEET OF BY -SDP DATE -f /22/97 CHK'D BY DATE PEAK FLOW CALCULATION PROJECT Riverwalk 1st Revised Cale. BASIN: M Tot. Area Imp. Area C= CASE 1 CASE 2 0.72 Acres 5470 SF 0.54 - 130 ft Overland Flaw Ct = L= n= S= 230 ft. Gutter flow 0.15 130 ft . 0.40 0.020 Tc = 5.19 min., by Equation 3 -2 of Guidelines Z1 = 3.0 For Z2 Z2 = 3 Type B = 1.0 n = 0.016 Relied = 3,5 S = 0.014 d = 0.340 ft. A R Q Tc Tc total 1 °c 0.35 0.16 1.13 1,17 6.37 2.80 1.09 °peak for Case 1 = 1.09 cfs Case 2 assumes a Time of Concentration less than 5 minutes so that the peak flow = .90(3.18)(Imp. Area) = 0.36 cfs So, the Peak flow for the Basin is the greater of the two flows, 1.09 cfs BOWSTRING METHOD DETENTION BASIN DESIGN 10 -Year Design Storm Time Increment (min) 5 Time of Conc. (min) 6.37 Outflow (cfs) 1 Design Year Flow 10 Area (acres) 0 72 Impervious Area (sq ft) 5470 'C' Factor 0.54 '208' Volume Provided 0 Area • C 0.389 PROJECT Riverwalk 1st Revised Cale. BASIN. M DESIGNER: JDP DATE. 04/22/97 Time Time Inc. Intens. 0 Cleve!. Vol.ln Vol.Out Storage (min) (sec) (in /hr) (cfs) (cu ft) (cu ft) (cu ft) 6.37 382 2.80 1.09 558 382 176 5 300 3.18 1.24 497 300 197 f 10 600 2.24 0.87 636 600 36 15 900 1.77 0.69 709 900 -191 20 1200 145 0.56 750 1200 -450 25 1500 1.21 0.47 767 1500 -733 30 1800 1.04 0.40 780 1800 -1020 35 2100 0.91 0.35 789 2100 -1311 40 2400 0.82 0.32 807 2400 -1593 45 2700 0.74 0.29 814 2700 -1886 50 3000 0.68 0.26 827 3000 -2173 55 3300 0.64 0.25 853 3300 -2447 60 3600 0.61 0.24 885 3600 -2715 65 3900 0.60 0.23 940 3900 -2960 70 4200 0.58 0.23 976 4200 -3224 75 4500 0.56 0.22 1008 4500 -3492 80 4800 0.53 0.21 1016 4800 -3784 85 5100 0.52 0.20 1057 5100 -4043 90 5400 0.50 0.19 1075 5400 -4325 95 5700 0,49 0.19 1111 5700 -4589 100 6000 0.48 0.19 1144 6000 -4856 208' DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Required '208' Storage Volume = Impervious Area x .5 in / 12 in /ft 208' Storage Volume Provided 2.17 DRYWELL REQUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN STO Maximum Storage Required by Bowstring Number and Type of Drywells Required 228 cu ft -9-cu ft 197 cu ft 0 Single 1 Double J rem Inland mi c Pacific Engineering West 707 7th, Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 509 458 -6840 Fax No. 509 458 -6844 1 Pcy) 01 r /2 3 h-e esa Y 2 k+ cuwv`c`-`)G7 7OT74C. &-Ats /A) (c 300 s-P 1900 C.c:6 + `400 C, ts) = 17/O = 2370 F G = 3 /G 300 = . rosZ 13oWsTR N es /.4.. v-kt Andtecf:171/L6 (OO 5F +4o00 SF 1900 S•F [ N MEMO ❑ PROJECT CALC. ❑ JOB NO. SHEET OF MEETING ❑ BY DATE OTHER ❑ CHK'D BY DATE 1 PEAK FLOW CALCULATION PROJECT Riverwalk 4th Addition BASIN. New pond on Baldwin Tot Area Imp. Area C= CASE 1 CASE 2 0 14 Acres 2480 SF 0.38 45 ft. Overland Flow Ct = L= n= S= Tc = 2 75 min , by Equation 3 -2 of Guidelines 90 ft. Gutter flow Z1 = Z2 = n= S= 0.15 45 ft 0.020 50.0 3.5 0.016 0.015 d = 0.075 ft. Qpeak for Case 1 = 0.17 cfs For Z2 Type B = 1.0 Rolled = 3.5 A R Q Tc Tc total 1 Qc 0.15 0.04 0.19 118 5.00 3.18 0.17 Case 2 assumes a Time of Concentration less than 5 minutes so that the peak flow = .90(3.18)(Imp. Area) = 0.16 cfs So, the Peak flow for the Basin is the greater of the two flows, 0.17 cfs BOWSTRING METHOD DETENTION BASIN DESIGN 10 -Year Design Storm Time Increment (min) 5 Time of Conc. (min) 5.00 Outflow (cfs) 0 3 Design Year Flow 10 Area (acres) 0.14 Impervious Area (sq ft) 2480 C' Factor 0.38 208' Volume Provided 0 Area ' C 0.053 Time Time Inc. Intens. Q Devel. VoI.in Vol. Out Storage (min) (sec) (in/hr) (cfs) (cu ft) (cu ft) (cu ft) 5.00 300 3.18 0.17 68 90 -22 <= 5 300 3.18 0.17 68 90 -22 10 600 2.24 0.12 84 180 -96 15 900 1.77 0.09 94 270 -176 20 1200 1.45 0.08 100 360 -260 25 1500 1.21 0.06 103 450 -347 30 1800 1.04 0 06 105 540 -435 35 2100 0.91 0.05 107 630 -523 40 2400 0.82 0 04 109 720 -611 45 2700 0.74 0.04 110 810 -700 50 3000 0.68 0 04 112 900 -788 55 3300 0.64 0.03 116 990 -874 60 3600 0.61 0.03 120 1080 -960 65 3900 0.60 0.03 128 1170 -1042 70 4200 0.58 0.03 133 1260 -1127 75 4500 0.56 0.03 137 1350 -1213 80 4800 0.53 0.03 138 1440 -1302 85 5100 0.52 0.03 144 1530 -1386 90 5400 0.50 0.03 146 1620 -1474 95 5700 0.49 0.03 151 1710 -1559 100 6000 0.48 0.03 156 1800 -1644 208' DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Required '208' Storage Volume = Impervious Area x .5 in / 12 in/ft 208' Storage Volume Provided DRYWELL REQUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN STO Maximum Storage Required by Bowstring Number and Type of Drywells Required PROJECT: Riverwalk 4th Addition BASIN: New pond on Baldwin DESIGNER: J.D.POE DATE: 04/22/97 103 cu ft 0 cu ft -22 cu ft 1 Single 0 Double .rte 52 170 171 173 172 I5,5 ,r.•a�► i _ 131 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE TYPE B CURB & GUTTER BACK OF 6' SIDEWALK RIGHT OF WAY - TRACT " 0" ® % INSTALL CONCRETE INLET TYPE 1 i W GRRAATE EL- 2028.85 4 - 'r1R ' Nt7Ei °wiSA9�i;31wY1ttwH£EBR ._�.._._..�..��.__ . 1' • EXISTING EASEMENT _/ KEYSTONE WALL A A .A.., - 1. BACK OF WALKWAY TOP OF BERM ELEV= 2028.87 KEYSTONE WALL POND BOTTOM BASIN (POND) M 0 (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) Ci BACK OF WALKWAY REQUIRED '208' POND VOLUME = 228 CU.FT. EXISTING '208' POND VOLUME = 291 CU.FT. INSTALL CONCRETE INLET TYPE 1 WiTYPE 1 METAL FRAME & GRATE GRATE EL- 2028.85 CO 0 N 0.2' FOR 1 CFS OUTFLOW ELEV.= 2027.05 ` 7 AVG SLOPE ='0.0127 L) INDIANA AVENUE WWP POWER LINES O Ln co NI- La N LC 0 0 N N 0 00 12" PVC MIN S- 0,0 T 1 16' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMIINT AS— CONSTRUCTED POND BOTTOM PROF LE h: r- io' v: 1" 2' 3' UTILITY MINIMUM 0 ■ cd N 0 N 1 FOR CARBON CONTENT RESULTS SEE PROJECT CORRESPONDENCE RIGHT OF WAY PEDESTRIAN RAMP z n SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE B DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME AND GRATE MCMILLAN LANE EDGE OF ASPHALT RAISE DRYWELL RIM 10 BE APPROX 0.2' ABOVE EDGE OF ASPHALT ELEVATION. REPLACE DRYWELL CRATE WITH SOLID COVER EXISTING DRYWELL GRATE DRYWELL CAP GRAPHIC SCALE (N 'QT 1 M... R • a a sky 0 pi Post -1t • Fax Note 7671 oat/ Arm p From Ea To ta Nitit P-6, co./Dept. Y'M. Co. t , l ath , Phone p , Phone #00660 7, Fax # A Jt . *pi Fax a Parry, Ed o V 3 p-1.041 From: Parry, Ed Sent: Monday, April 21, 1997 9:19 AM ' To: 'Inland Pacific Engineering' Subject: ATTN: Todd Whipple, P.E.: Riverwalk 1st Revisions to Pond M. (IPE It dtd 18 Apr 97) This looks like it will work in concept. A couple of items are needed yet: 1. Pipe needs to be shown in the plan view 2. What about relocation /protection of conflicting utilities? 3. It looks like the 0.8' from rim to finished floor should be 8 " (0.67'). 4. Please include calcs which show a. How the 208 volume at the proposed rim elevation will meet the required 208 volume needs b. Overall Pond Volume as compared to the storm volume for the contributing basin Page 1 April 18, 1997 IPE W.O. #96106 Spokane County Public Works Department Development Engineering Services 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 Attn: Ed Parry, Jr., P.E. Dear Ed: Per our meeting on Wednesday, April 16, 1997, you indicated that the drainage structure in Pond M was unacceptable due to the grate elevation providing more than the maximum allowable 0.8' of storage depth in the pond. To correct this situation, we propose to have an inlet installed in the pond, with the grate at 0.8' above the pond bottom (organic carbon content testing has previously been provided), and a pipe going from the inlet to the drywell. The drywell will require the raising of the rim to be above the edge of asphalt elevation to ensure that no stormwater will enter the drywell without receiving the proper `208' treatment. We are requesting your acceptance of the enclosed plan. Your prompt attention to this submittal would be greatly appreciated. Please call if you have any questions. Sincergly, Inlan Pacific ngineering Company Todd R. Whipple, TRW /jdp cc: file Dorumrnrl96lOdlmplanrhnge irr INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. RE: Riverwalk 1st Addition (P1414 -A) Request for Plan Change for Pond M, southwest corner of McMillan and Indiana 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 87814 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 • RECEIVED APR , 8 1997 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER April 17, 1997 I.P.E. W.O. #96106 Dean-Deily Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 ATTN: Mr. Mark Hancock RE: Construction Deficiency List Riverwalk 1st Addition Dear Mark: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. RECEIVED APR 1 8 1997 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER This letter transmits a list of construction items for Riverwalk 1st that are currently in non- conformance with approved project plans and applicable Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. This letter is based on our meeting at the County with Ed Parry on April 16, 1997, and previous letters regarding Riverwalk 1" construction.. This letter is an addendum to our previous letters and correspondence dated in March 1997; February 1997; October 1996, August 1996, July 1996, and June 1996 regarding deficiencies in Riverwalk 1st Addition construction. Check for the use of clay tiles on all drainage structures. Check the mortar on the outside of structures per meeting of last year after the utility construction went through. Those showing the use of clay -tiles must be removed and replaced; those structures lacking mortar both inside and out will need to also be removed and replaced. ra' Pond F, located at the southwest corner of Harmony & Indiana, requires the removal and replacement of the non- standard:structure and the damaged drywell cone. The ditch requires regrading to the Type 2 curb inlet. Pond A, located along the south side of Indiana beginning at Barker, requires regrading of the side - slopes to 3:1, grade side- slopes to top of sidewalk, there should be no edge of sidewalk reveal when done. Ensure that the berms in the pond are at least 6" off the pond bottom floor, no exceptions. The rocks at the Type 2 curb inlets need to be removed and replaced with sod. Pond M, located at the southeast corner of McMillan and Indiana, requires that the drywell rim be raised 0.2' above the edge of pavement elevation, and the grate be replaced with a solid lid. An inlet must be installed in the pond bottom with the grate 0.8' above the pond bottom, and a pipe installed from the catch basin to the drywell. This pipe will be required to negotiate the utilities beneath the pond bottom and may have to enter the drywell below the existing cap. See detail attached. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 -765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 Riverwalk 1" Construction Deficiency April 17, 1997 Page 2 Ear Before the relocated Mission Sidewalk can be poured, a utility box needs to be relocated south of the curb return. This has already been coordinated for you with WWP. You should schedule the concrete work the week of 4128197. The homeowner has also been notified and you must coordinate the new sidewalk location with his irrigation system. As you know, your plans for Riverwalk l" expire on July 5, seventy -nine days from today, These items must be corrected prior to that time, prior to finalization of project record drawings, and prior to calling for final inspection and acceptance of the construction by the County Engineer's office. We will assist you every way. However, you are required to schedule the work as well as notify us of the schedule for inspection. If we have adequate notification we can assist your contractor in completing these construction elements CORRECTLY! Please call with any questions. Sincerely, lnlan Pacific Engineering, Inc. Todd R. Whipple, P.E. cc: Ed Parry, Plan Review Engineer, Spokane County Public Works RD UMCNTS\96106Weflet9 l7. W PD Circular Channel Analysis & Design Solved with Manning's Equation Worksheet Name: PVC Comment: PVC PIPE Solve For Actual Discharge Computed Results: Discharge Velocity Flow Area Critical Depth Critical Slope Percent Full Full Capacity QMAX @.94D Froude Number Open Channel - Uniform flow Given Input Data: Diameter 1.00 ft Slope 0.0100 ft /ft Manning's n 0.010 Depth 0.50 ft 2.32 cfs 5.90 fps 0.39 sf 0.65 ft 0.0043 ft /ft 50.00 % 4.63 cfs 4.98 cfs 1.66 (flow is Supercritical) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.41 (c) 1991 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 JIMMY USE PROPERTY IINE-- \ ant< Of 5' SIGfl4 I( TRACT "D" TYpc; a Q. * 9VEIER PROPOSED SCENE/57 KEYSTONE WALL - r I POND BOTTOM 1- COMM! NYL TOP OF BERM ELEV= 2028.87 3. IN 25' L E• • 3.5' t 4IF 40' Aran O CO 0 4 O 04 Re9oOMTE ALL CATCH BASIN E 1 YP 2 METAL FRAME & GRATE TE EL =2026.98 BASIL! (P0ND) Y befi OF Rhein' REQUIRED '208' POND VOLUME a 331 CU.FT. EXi6TINO '208' POND VOLUME is 400 CU.FT. YO SLPE . . + wow« ROME (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) • B INSTALL CONCRETE INLET TYPE 1 W PE 1 METAL FRAME & GRATE GRATE EL■2026.98 � 2? '3� � ELEV. - 20 Y N. trout won R 99o 00 AS- CONSTRUCTED POND BOTTOM PROFILE H: r= 5' V: 1 "= 1' FOR CARBON CONTENT RESULTS SEE PROJECT CORRESPONDENCE WWP POWER LINES ti i (APPROXIMATE LOCATIO ) N —15' LEWD' k ii " DRMIEGE EISENERI ROC V WAY EQIC411CW Rot WIC Q JwREeLI EXISTING DRYWELL GRATE FDRYWELL CAP ORAPNIC SCALE SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE B DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 McTAL FRAME AND GRATE M MILLAN LANE RECEIVED krrt f $ SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER RAISE DRYWELL RIM TO BE APPROX 0.2' ABOVE EDGE OF ASPHALT ELEVATION. REPLACE DRYW GRATE WITH SOLID COVER gqg ix 0 Z g �08 April 30, 1997 IPE W.O. #96106 Attn: Ed Parry, Jr., P.E. Dear Ed: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Spokane County Public Works Department Development Engineering Services 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 RE: Riverwalk 1st Addition (P1414 -A) New Pond Plan Required on Baldwin. As we have mentioned, a low point was designed by North Idaho Engineering and constructed by Dean - Housley at the northwest corner of Baldwin & McMillan. Although a low point was designed at this location, no drainage facility was designed to collect the stormwater which would accumulate. This situation requires that a pond be constructed to collect and treat the stormwater at the Baldwin low point. We are recommending that the pond be constructed within the existing drainage and utility easement, so that no additional easements need to be acquired. Enclosed please find the plans for the proposed pond at the northwest corner of Baldwin and McMillan. Also attached is a copy of the basin map and the `208' /Bowstring calculation for the proposed pond. If you are in agreement, we would prefer to modify the record drawing mylars rather than the original mylars after the pond has been Successfully constructed. Please call with any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, .. Inland/Yacific E Todd R. Whipple, P.E TRW /jdp Enc. eering Compan /s, , cc: file Mark Hancock, Dean -Deily Company 707 West 7111 • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509 -458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208 -769 -7277 Oxuvum195I06Ibck*, nn PEAK FLOW CALCULATION PROJECT Riverwalk 4th Addition BASIN: New pond on Baldwin Tot. Area Imp. Area C= CASE 1 CASE 2 0.14 Acres 2460 SF 0.69 45 ft. Overland Flow Ct = L= n= S= 0.15 45 ft. 0.40 0.020 Tc = 2.75 min., by Equation 3-2 of Guidelines 90 ft. Gutter flow Z1 = 3.0 For Z2 Z2 = 3 Type B = 1.0 n = 0.400 Rolled = 3.5 S = 0.015 d = 0.470 ft. A R Q Tc Tc total I Qc 0.66 0.22 0.11 8.94 11.69 2.05 0.20 Qpeak for Case 1 = 0.20 cfs Case 2 assumes a Time of Concentration less than 5 minutes so that the peak now = .90(3.18)(Imp. Area) = 0.16 cfs So, the Peak flow for the Basin is the greater of the two flows, 0.20 cfs BOWSTRING METHOD DETENTION BASIN DESIGN 10 -Year Design Storm Time Increment (min) ' 5 Time of Conc. (min) 11.69 Outflow (cfs) 0.3 Design Year Flow 10 Area (acres) 0.14 Impervious Area (sq ft) 2480 'C Factor 0.69 208' Volume Provided 153 Area • C 0.097 Time Time Inc. Intens. Q Devel. Vol.ln Vol.Out Storage (min) (sec) (in/hr) (cfs) (cu ft) (cu ft) (cu ft) 11.69 701 2.05 0.20 186 210 -24 5 300 3.18 0.31 123 90 33 <__ 10 600 2.24 0.22 174 180 -6 15 900 1.77 0.17 195 270 -75 20 1200 1.45 0.14 201 360 -159 25 1500 1.21 0.12 203 450 -247 30 1800 1.04 0.10 205 540 -335 35 2100 0.91 0.09 206 630 -424 40 2400 0.82 0.08 209 720 -511 45 2700 0.74 0.07 210 810 -600 50 3000 0.66 0.07 213 900 -687 55 3300 0.64 0.06 219 990 -771 60 3600 0.61 0.06 226 1080 -854 65 3900 0.60 0.06 240 1170 -930 70 4200 0.58 0.06 249 1260 -1011 75 4500 0.56 0.05 256 1350 -1094 80 4800 0.53 0.05 258 1440 -1182 85 5100 0.52 0.05 268 1530 -1262' 90 5400 0.50 0.05 272 1620 -1348 95 5700 0.49 0.05 281 1710 -1429 100 6000 0.48 0.05 289 1800 -1511 208' DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Required '208' Storage Volume = Impervious Area x .5 in / 12 in /ft 208' Storage Volume Provided DRYWELL REQUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN STO Maximum Storage Required by Bowstring Number and Type of Drywells Required PROJECT: Riverwalk 4th Addition BASIN: New pond on Baldwin DESIGNER: J.D.POE DATE: 04/30/97 103 cu ft 153 cu ft 33 cu ft 1 Single 0 Double Irr West 707 7th, Suite 200 509 458 -6840 Inland Pacific Engineering Spokane, Washington 99204 Fax No. 509 458 -6844 &tD iv7/V , 1fsr/t/ h 67 1) d�> = boa sP- , y 38c SF cry✓= • /4- ft - 96 z 90 0 = / s y 0 330Y, 5) f Q7/0/, ls) = #900 1 'G „ = +/ _ 6c9 Sv MEMO ❑ CALC. ❑ MEETING ❑ OTHER ❑ PROJECT RII/?,{ to/I / JOB NO. 964* SHEET 2 OF 1 ! BY DATE CHK'D BY DATE J n DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS 1 ROADWAY EASEMENT SPECIFIED ON PLAN T 4/ TOP OF BERM ELEV = TOP OF CURB ELEV. + .20 FT. I � M 1 , 4114 , 1111111111111111141 , NOT TO SCALE NOTE: ORGANIC CARBON TESTING IS REQUIRED FOR THE TOPSOIL IF THE EDGE OF ASPHALT IS GREATER THAN 0.5' ABOVE SOD 3 MAX. J1 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE 1.5" SOD ON TOPSOIL, SOD INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE GRATE ELEVATION MAX. NOTE: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. 4' MIN. SECTIONAL VIEW TYPICAL "208" POND WITH DRAINAGE STRUCTURE 3:1 (TYP) EDGE OF ASPHALT 1" —3" TOPSOIL ON GRADED POND BOTTOM GRADED POND BOTTOM 1.11' -1.28' BELOW EDGE OF ASPHALT ■ 16' DRNG. ESMT. INLAND - I row � ENGIN 707 West 71h • Suite 200 Spokorw. WA 99204 (549) 458 -6840 FAX! (509) 458 -6844 BALDWIN & MCMILLAN NOTE: ORGANIC CARBON TESTING IS REQUIRED FOR THE TOPSOIL IF THE EDGE OF ASPHALT 15 GREATER THAN 0.5' ABOVE SOD TYPE A DRYWELL CRATE EL= 2029]5 RIVERWALK 1 ST. ADDITION PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ROADWAY EASEMENT SODDED POND BOTTOM EL= 2D29.25 NOTE: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. rh .A Jo / \ r rL 41 iL Ir rb II! ill 6 FLAT POND BOTTOM LOW POINT AT EDGE OF ASPHALT EL= 2030.25 3 -5' I DPIRES 9/24/'// Z' J 1 ] • 96106 NEW POND M2 REQUIRED '208' POND VOLUME = 103 CU.FT. DESIGNED '208' POND VOLUME = 153 CU.FT. POND BOTTOM AREA = 239 SOFT. 16' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ROADWAY EASEMENT 2030.49 EA BALDWIN LANE INLAND PAF E NG CI INE IC ERJNG 707 West 71:11• suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844„ 4' WALK TO HOUSE LOW P01 NT EA= 2030.25 16' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED FINISHED POND BTM EL.= 2029.25 LANDSCAPING BARK TO BE REMOVED FROM POND AREA RELOCATE EXIST. TREE & SHRUBS AS NECESSARY STA. 14+20, 20' LT. INSTALL TYPE A DRYWELL WITH METAL FRAME & GRATE • GRATE EL= 2029.75 1 2030.37 EA EDGE OF ASPHALT 2030.73 0 a~ BALDWIN & MCMILLAN RIVERWALK 1 ST. ADDITION PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION DATE' 04/29/97 SCALE: 1" =1D' BALDWIN PT = 14 +81.71 19 +58.83= MCMILLAN LANE ( EXPIRES 9/24/ ° f 3' 1 2 Gentlemen: S P o I< .A v e DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. johns, P.E.. County Engineer May 19. 1997 :Mark Hancock Stanton Development /Dean Housely Company 16720 N.E. 1 16th Street Bellevue. 'NA 98052 Very truly yours. William A. Johns, P. E. Spokane County Engineer ?c. C u T Y A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E.. Director SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Addition Mitigation for Clay Paver Adjustment Brick - Indiana Avenue We have discussed the issue of the use of clay paver Krick for adjusting the frame elevation on the catch basin at station 1 ±24(Lt) on Indiana Avenue. As you now know. clay paver brick are not an acceptable material for this purpose. The County Standards specify a cement brick, and our maintenance crews have found that die clay brick do not hold up as well as the cement brick. Although the clay brick apparently have a higher compressive strength than the cement brick. the clay brick are more brittle, and do not last as long as cement brick. Rather than risk tearing up Indiana Avenue at this time. the County Engineer has decided to accept the clay paver brick at this location only. This acceptance is conditioned on the payment of the amount necessary to cover the County's cost for the eventual repair of this catch basin due to the failure of the adjustment rings. Given the County's estimate of the costs to snake the repairs today, and considering inflation and the rate of return the County anticipates on the principal. this amount is S1950.00. This mitigation payment would not supersede any other required warranties. Any repairs that become necessary within the warranty period w.vould still be covered under the "Warranty" section of the Standards. Please let us know when we can expect this payment. Please contact Ed Parry at (509)456 -3600 if you have any questions in this matter. Edward J.`Par"ry, Jr.. P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: project file reviewer Todd Whipple, P.E.. Inland Pacific Engineering, 707 West 7th Avenue. Suite 200. Spokane. WA 99204 1026W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 1 _o_ _ANa_%!Rve_v 4__ r= P(FF,'j90, 11) 2Ovo , 9y ,9,3) = zar 0424 2241M • -7 Rive/seat / - At A vg Cr o1 Goff fir e ° dKe � % 5_a aT 2oT e 5a (4'4-3.GY5D 444( 5 __ /10w 7250) Gal bout ( & iltrzof4. et ela 225o (e(x;51,3) zz9.) Ufa) w 4_4k_ L SPOKANE COUNTY OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS CALCULATION SHEET Colcrbyion: \AC \v�J C1k.'. oar `�c\ I �r, �n� l�r ;o�r �e�5 0 /99 Checked by: Date: Sheet o n f Notes: �SL oopa eic� FaSi � Qik-ev g Colculatlone • • • • i I I I I IHhII i --H+ 11 ina+; �. I �s 1 uc�'f Reference lck.l�10_�.�vr or : :: :: : ' �� /Op�e ct ;■■■■■■■ $ p� ■ ■■ ••••••• P;.ak "Al b°, - r ■■ ■■■■■ s ■ 9 y s� ■■ � r l � r� � ■■■■■■■■■■■ 1 ■■■ ao.vn.p #L- ■ ■ ■■■ ■■ $ a . oo ■■■ ■■ ■■■■■■■ ■ ■■■ P re.hTr�.�v- ■ ■■■ ■ ■■■■ ■LS a-L_ _1 ■■ ■ 11 663.X> on.l_ I .5� ��� 1.t_ ;_ I I_o _ r �lac,r � �jr1 s(r�s �rs� 1 �.� t 1- . . _ .Csnnevl\- b -�. 1ks�r_; stirs) � L 1 � _ham 1 1Vo \_)\ SPOKANE COUNTY Proposed project: P_Fr x.DE,d- a-C, (=_ A pen< 26 L:i in -T n 72 " x 4 " Con Caere .S LOA ILA_ A Ise Pip 20. 121-in " a nine - Cmr es /n�..,.1� SAw2S W 71n CAS (1F_.FIy n u<<IQ - ■a - a.. - r_- -finis &L wit,G:< Y- tke: w< 1,4._ -- ;d ( ci4 -rif t H _Nati oi a cmcsf ec;<&`act III B N Seto -t- I[f /011rf f r Ect I ic.rr7/_ w cutd Vdv "a `Gt / s' ,,I aippin LAf.X )e_ nit_ Rno p as ct- ef'_(I k - 1 I c jv ic 6w ycL- Hu.--in, For ITN O / rk WV k 0 e l Estimated cost: Tax on materials: Estimated total cost: 13 )0 00 — 24' 13347 " Proposed by: Ilste Date: r- .�j -a` Accepted by: Date: June 30, 1995 W.O. No. 95527 Spokane County Department of Public Works 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 Attn: Ed Parry, P.E. Engineering Services Re: Riverwalk - a.k.a. Riverway Villa PE-1414 -81 Dear Ed: Enclosed you will find two sets of mylars, one set is the original mylars while the other set is the sepia mylar set. Please review and approve these plans. Also enclosed are the following, a second set of prints to complete the last submittal, two copies of sheets 2, 4, 9a and 9b which were revised per your latest comments, revised drainage calculations for pipe capacity for the pond inlets, calculations for the flow to the commercial area, one set is from NIE and uses the rational method, one set is from IPEC using Pond Pack (note we did not run a developed condition hydrograph due to the small size) and lastly the individual 208 -pond sheets. Please note, all submitted calculations are to be considered as submitted under the stamped cover letters submitted on June 29, 1995. I hope that this completes this phase of this project. Please call with any questions. We look forward to being able to pick up the mylars on Monday, July 3, 1995 from your office signed and approved. Thank you for your patience in these last few weeks, it has helped greatly. - Sincerely, Inland Pacific E g Co., Inc. Todd R. Whipple, P.E. TRW /tw cc: file i rr INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 509- 458 -6840 FAX: 509- 458 -6844 RECEIVED JUN 3 0 1995 SPOKAiiE COUNTY ENGINEER To: Spokane County Engineering ATTN: Ed Parry REF: Riverwalk First Addition The Following: Drawings Calculations Report Letter Maps Check $ Plans X See at Right NORTH IDAHO ENGINEERING, INC. 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 * Fax (208)664 -3507 TRANSMITTAL Date: 6/30/95 Job No: 4004 From: John Boyer We are Transmitting: *Status* X Herewith Proposed For Information Separate Cover Preliminary As requested Via Mail In Progress Your Files X Delivery Revised Your Submittal Personal Pickup X Final Checking Fedex As -built X Approval UPS For Payment Your Use Other Partial Other Please: Message: Call immediately Call after review X Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Reqd. Review /Comment No action reqd. Specific Items: 1 Copy Improvement Plans. 2 Sets Mylars. Hydrology Report. JUN 3 0 1995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 * Phone (208) 667-1171 • Fax (208)664 -3507 To: Spokane County Engineering Date: 6/29/95 ATTN: Ed Parry REF: Riverwalk First Addition NORTH IDAHO ENGINEERING, INC. TRANSMITTAL We are Transmitting: 'Status' X Herewith Proposed For Information Separate Cover Preliminary As requested Via Mail In Progress Your Files X Delivery Revised Your Submittal Personal Pickup X Final Checking Fedex As -built X Approval UPS - For Payment Your Use Other Partial Other The Following: Specific Items: Drawings Highlighted Copy improvement Plans. Calculations Original Red Lines. Addendum # 1. Report Hydrology Report. 208 Lot Plans. Letter Copy Utility Plans - Have not changed. Maps Copy Approved WSDOT Ramp Modifications Plan. Check $ Mission Curb Grade Sheet. Plans X See at Right Please: Message: Call immediately Call after review X Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Reqd. Review /Comment No action reqd. From: James O. Morris Job No: 4004 RECEIVED JUN 2 9 1995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER JUN -29 -1995 11:35 Ip� INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Telephone - (509) 458 -6840 FAX - (509) 458 -6844 II NOTES: INLAND PACIFIC ENG DATE: ec Ake ti `/e5 STO: . Go. II COMPANY: P.01 - 34i sr II FAX NUMBER: ''7 • NUMBER OF PAGES: INCL. COVER PAGE • FROM: JOB NUMBER ca.A_eP tri2 FAX TRANSMISSION OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Spokane County, Washington July 5, 1995 To: Todd Whipple, P.E. From: Development Engineering Services RE: Language for P.U.D. Plat Dedication & Covenants ✓ Project # P1414 1. Please incorporate the following into the plat dedication: Drainage easements, as platted and shown hereon, which are for the purpose of installing, operating, and maintaining drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted to the or its successors in interest. (HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION) This Plat is subject to the separate DECLARATION OF COVENANT as recorded under (dale) Auditor's Document No. which by reference is made a part hereof. The sale of Lot 8, Block 6 shall not close, nor shall a building permit for Lot 8, Block 6 be issued, until such time as McMillan Lane is extended beyond the plat boundary to either a cul- de -sac meeting Spokane County requirements or to a connection with Mission Avenue. 2. Please ensure that the temporary turnaround easement on Lot 8, Block 6 is shown on the plat. An easement for Basin P (on Tract A) should also be shown on the plat, or a blanket drainage easement should be provided over Tract A 3. Per our conversation, we have hand- lettered onto the mylars the requirement for sprinkler systems meeting the County's Interim Irrigation Standards for "208" Swales for the swales along Indiana Avenue and Mission Avenue. A copy of these Standards is included for your reference. r DECLARATION OF COVENANT In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of Plat No. PE - 1414, Riverwalk First Addition (hereinafter referred to as the "Plat "), the undersigned covenants and agrees that: 1. The subdivider /sponsor will construct the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 2. A lot is served by a private road when: a. die only road frontage for the lot in the Plat is on the private road, or; b. a lot laving frontage on more than one road (public or private) constructs an approach to the private road 3. The Riverwalk First Addition Honkie Owners Association or its successors in interest shall maintain the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. The Riverwalk First Addition Homeowners Association shall maintain the drainage swales within and adjacent to the public rights-of -way for Indiana Avenue and Mission Avenue with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of stonmwater in the drainage swales as indicated by the approved plans. 4. The owner(s) of any lot created by the Plat or alteration thereof and served by a private road shall be responsible for maintenance of said private road, including associated drainage facilities, in conformance with approved plans oil file with the County Engineer's office. 5. Maintenance financing of the private roads and associated drainage facilities shall be in a manner determined by the Riverwalk First Addition Home Owners Association or their successors in interest. 6. Should the Riverwalk First Addition Honkie Owners Association be terminated for any reason, the successors in interest shall he the individual lot owners, or their successors in interest, who are members of the Riverwalk First Addition Home Owners Association at the time of said termination. 7. In the event such private road including associated drainage facilities is improved to Spokane County standards for public streets, and die County is willing to accept the dedication of such road and drainage facilities, each lot owner shall execute any conveyance documents necessary to accomplish such dedication. 8. Owners of lots within the Plat who are served by such road may sue and recover damages and attorneys' fees from any owner of any lot within the Plat which is also served who refuses to participate in the road and drainage facilities construction, financing, and maintenance. 9. WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, or maintain or otherwise service the private roads, and associated drainage facilities contained within or providing service to the property described in the Plat. By accepting this Plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued for property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind of nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road or its' associated drainage facilities. 10. Spokane County is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all private roads and /or drainage easements, for the purpose of inspection and emergency maintenance of drainage swales, and any other drainage facilities, if not properly maintained by the Riverwalk First Addition Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect and maintain the drainage easements or drainage swales, nor does the County accept any liability for failure by the Riverwalk First Addition Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest to properly maintain such areas. 11. The lot owners within this Plat shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface path of natural or eau -made drainage flow over and across their respective properties. 12. The lot owner or his representative shall inform each succeeding purchaser of all drainage easements on the property and of his responsibility for maintaining surface drainage pads and swales within said easements. 13. The Riverwalk First Addition Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest, shall maintain all water quali treatment swales ( "208 swales ") and drainage ditches situated within this Plat, and any portion of a 208 swale situated in or adjacent to the public rights-of -way for Indiana Avenue and Mission Avenue adjacent to this Plat, with a permanent ground cover as specified on the current approved plans on file with the County Engineer's Office. The Riverwalk First Addition Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest, may install approved shrubbery and /or trees which do not obstruct die flow and percolation of stone drainage water in the 208 swales and drainage ditches, as indicated by the current approved plans on tile with the County Engineer's Office. The Riverwalk First Addition Home Owner's Association shall maintain the drywells, as shown on the approved road plans, located in private drainage facilities. 14. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas, nor the responsibility for any dainage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties sue to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. 15. Whenever the Riverwalk First Addition Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest, fail to maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved drainage plan, a notice of such failure may be given to the Riverwalk First Addition Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest, by the County. If not corrected within the period indicated on said notice, the County has the right to correct the maintenance failure, or to have it corrected, at the expense of the Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest. 16. Any building that is constructed on a lot in this Plat shall be set at such an elevation so as to provide positive drainage away from any drainage entry point to the building (including but not limited to a window well, a window unprotected by a window well, or a doorway). Said positive drainage shall consist of a minimum slope of 3% away from the building for a distance of at least 10 feet from the building. The lots shall be graded so that either a) all runoff is routed away from the building, and conveyed over the lot to a natural drainage swale or approved drainage facility, or b) drainage intercepted on the lot is disposed of on the lot in an approved drainage facility. The approved drainage facility shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file at the County Engineer's Office. Any revisions to the approved drainage plans must be approved by the County Engineer's Office prior to construction of said revisions. 17. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas, nor die responsibility for any damage whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and/or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. 18. This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns, including the obligation to participate in die maintenance of the private road and drainage facilities as provided herein. STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY A Washington General Partnership By: HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION A Washington Corporation Its General Partner By: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) County of ) SS 1 certify that 1 know or that 1 have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me , and said person acknowledged that he(she) signed this instrument, on oath stated that he(she) was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such corporation, foi the uses and purposes stated in the itstrmitent. DATED this day of I99 . NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires • By: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION A Washington Corporation Its General Partner By: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) County of ) ss I certify that I know or that I have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me , and said person acknowledged that he(she) signed this instrument, on oath stated that he(she) was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such corporation, for the uses and purposes stated in the instrument. DATED this day of , 199_ . NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires COUNTY ENGINEERS ®001/009 FAX COVER SHEET X57 Spokane County Engineer's Office - Third Floor Fax # 324 -3478 q -So2Q_1 1026 W BROADWAY SPOKANE, WA 99260 - I'IIONE # (509) 456 -3600 07/26/95 09:46 22509 3243478 DATE: TO: �. COMPANY: CITY / STATE: NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): FROM: -� - z&- �La MESSAGE /SPECIAL INST1tUCTION: ,. o S FAX #: t53 6 ft s (i) Pa, ° Ait • (c2) 0 4_0\A Deuliz of toy-c/ P-utetutta 07/28/95 09:48 0509 3243478 COUNTY ENGINEERS ®002 /1103 9. DECLARATION OF COVENANT In consideration of the app:oval by Spokane Comity of Plat No. PE -1414, Rirdwalk Fur Adttion (hereinafter referred to as the 'Plat';, the undersigned covcnanes and agrees that: 1. The subdivider/sponsor will construct the private toads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in tie County Engineer's Office. 2. A lot is served by a private road when: a. the only road frontage for the of in the Plat is on the private road, or; b. a lot having frontage on more than ow toad (public or private) cotssmtcrs an approach to the private road. 3. The Riverwalk First Addition Hume Owners Assneialloo or its successors in interen shall maintain the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with nth approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. The Riverwalk First Addition Homeowners Association shell maintain tie drainage !wales within and adjacent m the public rights-o6 way for Indiana Avenue and Mission Avenue with a permanent live covet of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery atdlor trees, which do out obstruct the Row and pereolatiou of stow mwater in the drainage awales as indicated by tot approved plans. 4. The ewer(s) of any lot cr:atcd by the Plat or alteration thereof and served thy a private road shall be responsible for 9uimeuana of said private mad, including associated draiwg facilities. in nenformmcc with approved plans on file with the roomy Engineer's office. 5. Ma;ne.ounee fwarviug of the private roads Lind associated drainage fadlhiea shall he in a numrt detexmiucd by the Rivet First Addition Home Owners Association or diet successors In Intend. 6. Should tine Riverwalk Fite Addition Home Owners Associadon be tcrmimmd 631 any reason, the successors in humeri shall he the individual for owners, or thin successors in imerest. who are members of roe Rivervnik First Addition Home Owners Association at the time of said temiinatina 7. In the even such private load including associated drainage facilities is improved m Spokane County standards for public streets, and the County is willing in accept the dedication of such road and drainage facilities. each Inn nwucr slit II execute any conveyance documents necessary to accomplish such dedication. 8. Owners of lots within the Plat who ere served by such road may sue and remover damages and auorueys' fees from any owner of any for within the Plat which is also served who refuses to participate in the road and drainage faciitic contortion, financing and maintenance. WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve. or maintain or otherwise service the private loads. and asso drainage facilities contained within ox providing service to the property destiribed its the Plar. By :.mewing this Plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued for property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind of nande whatsoever to Wadi*, examine, survey, convrmt, alter repair. improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road m its' associated drainage facilities. 10. Spokane County is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all private roads and/or dunnage eawauenrs, for the purpose of inspection and emergency maineliana of drainage swabs, and any other drainage facilities. it sot properly maintained by dm Rivenvalk Firs) Addition Homeowner's Association. or their successors in ituerrst. Spokane County does sot accept the responsibility to imagers and maintain the drainage easements or drainage swains, oar does the County accept any liability for failure by the Riveawalk First Addition Fomeowner's Association. or their successors in imam; to properly maintain such meas. 11. the lot ownem within this Flat thall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface path of natural or tun -nu drainage flow over and across their respective properties. 12. The lot owner or his representative shall inform each err. ding purchaser of W drainage easemcros m the property and of his nsputibility for maintaining surface drainage paths and swales within said urwdeuts. 13. The Riverwalk First Additiro Homeowner's Aso Tarim, or their sumamrs in interest, stall maintain all water quality Ireaonent Swak$ ('208 swales') and drainage ditches situated within this Plat, and any potion of a 208 swak situated in or adjacent to the public rights-of-way for Indiana Avenue and Mission Avenue adjacent in this Plat, with a penoammm ground cover as specified on the parent approved plans on file with the County Engineer's Of& e. Tloe Riverwalk Firs Addition Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest, may install approved shrubbery and/or teens which do in obstruct the flow and pexcoluionof storm drainage water in the 208 swaks and drainage ditches, as indicated by the current approve plans on tic with the County Ens ineer's Office. The Riverwalk First Addition Home Owner's Association shall maintain the drywdis. as shown on the approved road plans, located in private drainage facilities. 07/28/95 09:47 '0509 3243478 10. Spokane County does not au cpt the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage casanerus or 0oodplain arcas, oar the responsibility for any damage, whatsoevet, including boa not limited to inverse condemnation w any properties sue to deficient construction and /ar mahatma as of drainage courses in drainage casements on private property. 15. Whenever the Rivcrwalk First Addition Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest, fail to taeiunin We drainage facilities in conformance with the approved drainage plan, a notice of such failure may be given to it= Rivervalk First Addition Homeowner's Asm union, or their o,rr•ewm in interest, by the County. If not corrected within the period indicated on said troths. the County has the right to correct the maintenance White, or to have it corrected, at the expense of the Homeowner's Association, or their va:essors in imermt. 16. Aoy building that is constructed on a lot in this Plat shall be set at such an devotion so as to provide positive drainage away from any drainage entry point to the building (including but not limited to a wiadow well, a window unprotected by a window well, or a doorway). Said positive drainage shall consist of a minimum slope of 3% away horn the building fora distance of at least 10 feet from the building. The lots shall he waded so that either a) all runoff is owed away fiom the building. and convcyal over the Ina to a natural drainage Swale of unproved drainage facility, or b) drainage intercepted on the lot is disposed of on the lot in an approved drainage facility. The approved drainage facility shall be comtrucwd in accordance with the approved plats on file as the County Engineer's Office. Any revisions to the approved drainage plans must be approved by the County Engineer's Office prior to construction of said revisions. 17. Spokane County does nut ac_cpt the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage axioms or 0oodplain areas, tar the responsibility for any damage whatsoever, including but not dinned to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and/or maintenance of drainage messes iu drainage tremens on private property. IS. This cOVCUNII and agreement stall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns. including the obligation to participate in the maftuunama Of the private road and drainage facilities as provid,al herein STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY A Washington General Partnership By: HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION A Washington Corporation Its General Partner By: COUNTY ENGINEERS 1/10o3 /oo3 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) a County of ) 1 certify that 1 know or Jur I have satisfactory evident* that is the person who appeared before are . and said person acknowledged that he(she) signed this instrument, on oath stated that be(she) was authorized u. execute de inslnmem and acknowledged it as the of HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, to be the free and voluntary as of such corporation, fast the uses ant purposes stated in the instrument. DATED this _ day of 199_ NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington. residing at My appointment expires TO: ATTENTION: Description n Xerox Prints fl Copy of Letter El Original Drawing El Contract Documents El El Work Authorization El Report Ell No. Copies / / Purpose n Information CI Review & Comments n Per Your Request El Written Approval El Signature & Return EJ Remarks Signed INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 °apt gertb Spokane Cou4j DATE 7/418_ 26 1545 I.P.E. PROJECT #: q55 7 PROJECT NAME: kiVerWak Re5 f Add//inn Descrthtion nes m laps— Sit eels 1 h q Pr/v41c Peea Poo m AS Leger UpddeeP EAt 414 ) eat Ca-rh A Cock /1 cfr" in co riotravi761—; kl tie' Ajo BARKER ROAD (rm.) r r s2' i t 4' 2' •• 5' 2' TRAFFIC TRAFFIC 9110E SIOEWALX LANE LEFT TURN LANE 45' 2% MIN --ACP 0. 'A' ACP 0— 'E' -- PER R —VALUE TESTING 4' Orin.) ]OTAL ACP DEPTH RAY FU TARE ACOUISTION 5 WIDTH AS REQUIRED ORAINACE AND SDEWALK EASEMENT 208 TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE 5' 2' 90EWALK 27C TYPE '9" OURS 4 1 T/C + 0.I' r AM111U11 WATER OEPTH FOR 205 0.9' uDJIUUM DEPTH FOR STOMA VOLUME MAXWUM WATER SURFACE ELEVA1ION 001_5 NOT ENCAOACH ON FUTURE ACOU1911DM AREA Drawn By F J.P Designed Bs Cneume Sr O 8/ 94 5/ SCALE ICRIZDNIAL: NONE VERTICAL NONE DF310E OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER W. 1025 BROADWAY AVE. SPOKANE. WA. 99260 455 —]5m APPROVED / '" BARKER ROAD COUNTY F" MISSION AVENUE TO SPOKANE RIVER D4HE — 'r —9 Y E.J.P TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION SHEE 1 OF 1 p 4AGY1 0 { 3 I r I I J A, 11 1 2! 'd 71 1 VI . 1 14 /A b • , r a 10 ARI • 14 1 WI is gm 11,4 . - • bilypti lial 171 10011 tii IN FP100#10 *#0 tt . 10 WO* 111* 0,.1 ; 4 46111% I 0 PR- .pr N A 07:5 ZS-6419-4e 28 93 Ac 5 DATE 3 -TZ es r# rE '3 1/ A ro . 9 L 0T6 7.35 4/. 30Ac . G G' 6 /A D c SCRIPT,ON 7 5 £CT:OA/ REP 0LILCEO FRO M LIN€`N TC June 14, 1995, Extension of Time and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -I -82 / ZE -92 -81 File No. PE- 1414 -8I / Page 11 38. The lots or common open space shown on the May 19, 1995, Revised Preliminary Plat that are within the 200 foot Shoreline boundary are required to comply with the Spokane County Shoreline Program regulation. The Final Plat shall show the 200 foot shoreline boundary. Each lot which includes the 200 foot boundary must have a buildable site that meets all required setbacks (both zoning and shorelines) before it is recorded as a Final Plat. Notes (at least 2) shall be placed on the Final Plan drawing near the affected lots and common open space which state: The property with the 200 foot Shoreline boundary has legal limitations on the use of this land pursuant vegetation and building of structures, including fences. 39: If a Final Plat is recorded with any lot partially within the 200 foot boundary of the Shoreline, a TITLE NOTICE shall be recorded by Spokane County Planning immediately after recording the Final Plat with the County Auditor. The TITLE NOTICE shall include a statement similar to: Any lot's property or conunon open space property within the 200 foot shoreline boundary have limitations on building stnuctures (including fences) and changing the natural vegetation pursuant the SPOKANE COUNTY SHORELINE PROGRAM regulations. 40. After the commercial parcel is granted B -2 Zoning with the recording of a Final Plat, the applicant/owner should make application for a Binding Side Plan to allow for timely division and sale of portions of the commercial site after a Final Binding Site Plan is recorded. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Prior To Issuance Of A Building Permit Or Use Of The Property As Proposed: 1. All previously imposed conditions are still applicable. 2. The County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a PRINCIPLE Arterial and Mission Avenue as a MINOR Arterial. The existing right -of -way widths are not consistent with those specified in the Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan, in addition to the required right -of -way dedication, a strip of property 5 feet in width along Barker Road and 10 feet in width along Mission Avenue shall be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when arterial improvements are made to Barker Road and Mission Avenue.' 3. As per the original conditions of approval: "A traffic analysis of each phase will be required of the developer and reviewed by Spokane County prior to plat finalization. This analysis will be coordinated with the State of Washington Department of Transportation. A traffic analysis for each phase will serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Should the analysis determine a need for intersection upgrading, the developer will be assessed a proportionate share for the required improvements. 4. Prior to any plat checking of Riverway Villa for phased finalization of the plat the aforementioned analysis shall be completed. 5. Intersection and road improvements shall be constructed and phased as follows predicated on an agreement reached on or about August 4, 1994, between North Idaho Engineering and the Spokane County Engineer. Barker Road: Phase I: Construct Barker/Indiana intersection (Barker Road to be a 5 -lane section per the County's Special section for Barker Road) Provide acceleration /deceleration lanes (sized per WSDOT Design manual), as well as inbound and outbound tapers. Phase 11• Construct Barker Road north to the Spokane River, and south to Mission Avenue, unless built out sooner as part of Phase VI. Phase VI: Construct Barker Road north to the Spokane River, and south to Mission Avenue, unless built out sooner as part of Phase II. Mission Avenue: Phase I: Construct Mission/Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) intersection. Construct north side of Mission Avenue (per the County's Special Section for Mission Avenue) from Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) to Barker. Provide inbound taper to Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) intersection. Phase Ill: Construct Mission/Potomac and Mission/Yukon intersections. Construct north side of Mission Avenue (per the County's Special Section for Mission Avenue) along the Mission Avenue frontage from the easterly plat boundary to Mission/Clark Fork (Harmony Lane). Provide inbound taper to the widened Mission/Yukon intersection from east of the easterly plat boundary. ••■• .s June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- 1414 -81 / Page 12 f and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE -1 -82 / ZE -92 -81 6. Conditions of Approval require that Barker Road and Mission Avenue improvements adjacent to Phase VI are to be completed prior to issuance of a building permit for any projects on that parcel. 7. The aforementioned phasing is a minimum development program. Changes to this construction schedule may be implemented pending completion of the Traffic Impact Analysis for each phase of the development. 8. Engineers Condition #21 of April 2, 1982 Hearing Examiner Committee Findings and Order required that a strip of property 15 feet in width along Barker Road be dedicated from Mission Avenue to the Spokane River. Since a portion of this strip is not controlled by the applicant this requirement for dedication is not applicable. Right -of -way along Barker Road within the original approved plat shall be dedicated at the time of final plat approval or vesting of any commercial rezone. Improvements to Barker Road from the Spokane River bridge on Barker to Mission Ave shall still be required with the existing right -of -way per a phasing plan to be agreed to by the developer and approved by the County Engineer. 9. Regarding the May 19, 1995, redesign Plan the following condition shall apply: (1) Temporary cul -de -sacs shall be constructed at the terminus of Indiana Avenue, Tippi Canoe Lane cannot be used as a public road tum- around and all other streets that provide access to more than one lot shall also provide an acceptable turn- around. (2) Improvements to proposed roadways shall be as outlined in the approved conditions of approval or as amended by the overall traffic analysis currently being completed. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 2. The dedication shall state: The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULiD by petition method pursuant to RCW 365.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULiD by resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. Provided, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution under RCW 36.94. 3. Applicant will make connection to Public Sewer System. Sewer Connection Permit is required. 4. Plans and specifications for the public facilities are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. Spokane County plan submittal requirements apply. 5. The dedication shall state: The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owners) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) our the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 6. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 7. Applicant shall make connection to public sewer system. Sewer connection permit is required. Plans and specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized." 2. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any attached sheets as noted. Enclosure S P o t< A N e PLANNING DEPARTMENT Thank you. MEMORANDUM Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads Spokane County Division of Utilities Spokane County Health District Spokane County Division of Buildings Spokane County Parks Department Fire Protection District No. 1 Consolidated Irrigation District Central Valley School District Washington State Department of Transportation FF':OM: Thomas Veljic, Planner III DATE: August 26, 1994 SUBJECT: Extension of Time for PE- 1414 -81 RIVERWAY VILLA G O U N 1 l \VALLIS 1). I1UHI(:AIRD. UIIk E("I'OI? The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached request for an Extension of Time to finalize the plat of PE- 1414 -81 RIVERWAY VILLA. The owner /applicant has also submitted a revised phasing schedule, final PUD, and final plat of Riverway Villa First. If you have comments on the proposed extension or revised plat documents or believe additional conditions should be made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to Thomas Veljic by September 9, 1994. c: North Idaho Engineering, West 4200 Sehice Way, Coeur D'Alene, ID 83814 1 026 WEST BROADWAY AVIENUE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -(1240 • (5(19) 456 -2205 • FA X: Ono) 45' -2241 • '11)1) Ling) 12.1.3I1,6 1111111_ r PLEASE COMPLETE TIIE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: I)rietly summarize the progress made, In dale, in preparing the plat to be finalized (i.e., physical construction, bonding for improvements, surveying and drafting work, accomplishing various departmental requirements, obtnining or granting easements, etc.) See attached letter n I \ v I r ' ` 1 t p 1 �) 2. .,,, , \\-ii. 1 ( 1I I 1 . „ II \ DATE ; RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT AUG 2 41994 PRELIMINARY PLAT EXTENSION OF TIME FORM SPO!ANE COUNT? RW+Utlw 1%y OZgpy,,R'nIMNT Plat Number: P1 91 4 Address: W. 9200 Seltice Way City, Stale, Zip: Coeur d 'Alene, ID 83814 Phone: (208) 667 -1171 H N Riverway Villa # of Lots: 365 11 of Acres: 107.5 Sponsor: North Idaho Engineering, Int�wner: WELCO Group, Tnc Address: W. 9200 Seltice Way Addt ss : 1220 116th Ave. N.E. City, State. zip: d'Alene, ID 83814 City, Since, 7.ip:Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: , (208) 667 -1171 Ph one: (206) 454 - 5959 Engineer /Surveyor; North Idaho Engineering, Inc. I'IIASEI) PROJECT (FORE COMPLETE() ONLY IF THE PLAT IS ❑EINCI DEVI:I.OPIiI) AND FINALIZED IN 1'I IASI''S) # of lots originally approved: 365 # of phases finalized to date: 0 # of lots retraining to be finalized: 365 # of acres remaining: 1 07. 5 175 ASS? I1ETI1RN 'I'IIIS FORM ALONG WI11I $1- 71riXi'ENSION OF TIME FEE. • North Idaho Engineering, Inc. 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 • Phone (208) 667 -1171 • Fax (208) 664 -3507 August 16, 1994 Spokane County Planning Department 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 ATTN: Mr. Tom Veljic REF: Extension of time request for PE- 1414.81, ZE92 -81, PUDE -1- 82 Riverway Villa, an approved Preliminary Plat Dear Tom: In accordance with Spokane County Subdivision ordinance Chapter III, Section G, and RCW 58 17.140 this letter will act as our formal request for a three year extension of time for the above referenced project. As stated in Chapter III, Section G, "The Planning Director or designee may administratively approve extensions for up to three (3) -year periods, provided at least one (my underline) of the following circumstances is found to apply:" III G1. that some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the last extension was granted and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval; Response: The Final Plat Map for the Riverway Villa First Addition was finalized and submitted for review prior to the 1993 granting of time extension for this project. Comments were received shortly after that time from the Spokane County Planning Department. Comments from the Spokane County Surveyor were first received via the Engineering Department on July 26, 1994. The Final Plat Map has been finalized, but not recorded at this time. III G2. that the preliminary plat as approved remains consistent with the Generalized Comprehensive Plan for Spokane County insofar as density and other development provisions apply, and the sponsor has taken substantial steps towards finalizing his plat, which shall include but not be limited to: a. surveying the lots within the development; b. arranging for public services to the site; c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary plat; WP \94 \GENE.4004.EXT AUG 231994 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 16, 1994 Mr. Tom Veljic Page 2 d. the were Response: Hp \94 \GENE.40 completion of studies or other requirements which part of preliminary plat approval; The Riverway Villa Project has made extensive progress toward the finalization of at least three of the phased areas. There have been several items which have been expensive and time consuming items of resolution. Negotiations with the Spokane County Utilities Department, and the Washington State Department of Transportation transpired to determine the route the off project Sewer Main Extension should drain from the Riverway Villa Project. The selected route would tie into the North Valley Sanitary Sewer Interceptor Main. Three separate topographic surveys were performed over several weeks. The first topographic survey profiled Indiana Avenue from Barker Road to Flora Road, South on Flora Road to Mission Avenue, West on Mission Avenue to it's terminus, thence Westerly through undeveloped area to the Sanitary Sewer Interceptor Main on Sullivan Road. The second topographic survey was of Barker Road from the Spokane River Southerly to Sprague Avenue. The third topographic survey was through farmland for over two miles Easterly and Southerly and across Interstate 90 Easterly of the Sprague Avenue Lane merging with Interstate 90. Subsequent to these surveys several studies were developed, cost estimates performed, and numerous meetings held which included several different Departments of Spokane County, as well the Right of Way and Utility Departments of W.S.D.O.T. These meetings and surveys were performed to determine the most regionally beneficial location of the Sewer Main and required Lift Station for the ultimate future development of the Spokane Valley within this region. This process took nearly five months to survey, August 16, 1994 Mr. Tom Veljic Page 3 Response Continued WP \94 \GENE. study and negotiate to completion. After completion Final Engineering drawings were prepared and submitted. The Riverway Villa First Addition Improvement Plans could not be resubmitted Utilities Department or Engineering processing until it was determined whether the Sanitary Sewer Main Line Sewer within Villa (Indiana) Avenue would flow East or West, if there would be sewer within Barker Road, or the adjacent farmland. we the ormed, l and m Improvement Plans n resubmitted. were performed, P The Riverway Villa First Addition Sanitary Sewer Plans were subsequently approved and signed by the Spokane County Utilities Department. The construction contracts were awarded in June by the developer, and several attempts have been made to start construction. The permit process has been delayed by unforeseen concerns of the Spokane County Engineering Department. The Riverway Villa Domestic Water Irorovement Plans have been reviewed by all app p agencies and approved for construction. The construction contracts were awarded in June by the developer, and is currently the same status as the Sanitary Sewer Construction. A Traffic Impact Report was performed for the project. Traffic counters were set formore a one month period during March and Ap 1 various locations along Barker Road, Mission Avenue, and Interstate 90 at the on and off ramps. The Traffic Impact Report was submitted April 15, 1994 to the Spokane County Engineering Department and subsequently to W.S.D.O.T. During June 1994, W.S.D.O.T. and Spokane County did independent traffic counts (not analysis) and found a substantial increase in the quantity o traffic had occurred since the March and April traffic along offramps. Road and August 16, 1994 Mr. Tom Veljic Page 4 The Street and Storm Drain Improvement Plans and Response plan checks of the Riverway Continued the County s S A d ditio p would not be Villa First Addition Final Plat Map released by the Spokane County Engineering Department until further studies utilizing the newly acquired information were p There was a meeting held on July 26, 1994 with the Spokane County Engineering Department, the Developer and W.S.D.O.T. at which time an acceptable comfort level was reached by W.S.D.O.T. and Spokane County Engineering Department with the potential resolution of the increased traffic, and the plan reviews were released. Indiana Avenue was determined to be Collector Arterial by the Engineering Department, and as such the overall width of Indiana Avenue changes from 70' as shown on the approved Preliminary Plat Map to 86' as shown on the Revised Final PUD Plan al submitted herewith. This createdesubstantiat redesign of Improvement Plans, t Pasts, Maps, and lot lines within all ja a pha which included the Riverway Villa The following additional work has occurred on the Riverway Villa project within the last year as well: 1. Survey calculations of the tre first 37 Lot Final Plat Map was performed. 2. Public services to the G site have ad Cox with W.W.P., Appropriate letters are available upon request. Construction coordination with these utility companies for the first 37 lots has occurred as well. 3. Financing for the construction is in place, construction is ready to begin once the Spokane County Engineering Department release of construction permits is obtained. 4. Sanitary Sewer Improvement Plans for nearly 2 miles of Off - Project Sewer with Lift Station design have been submitted to the Spokane County Utilities Department. WP \94 \GENE.4004.E%T August 16, 1994 Mr. Tom Veljic Page 5 Response Continued WP \94 \GENE. The Spokane County reviewed the plans this firm. We are those comments. Utilities Department have and submitted comments to currently responding to W.S.D.O.T. Utilities Department wants Spokane County Utilities Department's signature on the W.S.D.O.T. submittal application prior to processing. Jim Legat has signed this application, requested some minor changes, and this firm submitted said plans to W.S.D.O.T. August 18, 5. The Final Engineering design for the Street and Storm Drain Improvement Plans, the Sanitary Sewer Improvement Plans, and Domestic Water Improvement Plans and Final Plat Maps for Phases II and IV as shown on the previously submitted Phasing Plan have been completed and will be submitted to the appropriate approving agencies within the next few weeks. 6. The Final PUD Plan for the Southerly 1/2 of the 118± acre Riverway Villa Project was previously submitted, reviewed and approved. The Final PUD for the Northerly 1/2 of the Riverway Villa project was submitted, reviewed, revised accordingly, and is resubmitted herewith. 7. The Mitigation Agreement between the developer and the Central Valley School District has been executed, and a copy enclosed herewith. 8. Landscaping Plans for Indians Avenue have been prepared by others, and are submitted herewith. Landscaping plans for Mission Avenue are being prepared at this time. 9. A draft copy of The Draft Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, Articles of Incorporation, Consent in Lieu of Organizational meeting of The Board of Directors, and Bylaws for the Riverway Villa project (which will be known to future homebuyers as Riverwalk) have been completed August 16, 1994 Mr. Tom Veljic Page 6 and submitted herewith. 10. A verbal agreement with the Parks Department has been reached. 11. subtantial Fifty Thousand 1 Dollars n has f been r n paid to this firm by the developer(s) of this project to date, for the above referenced work performed, and related additional work performed on this project within the last year. 12. "R" value soils testing has been performed on the project by a licensed soils Engineering firm, and results included in the aforementioned redesigned Street and Storm Drain Improvement Plans. III G3. that at the time preliminary approval was granted the development of the proposal was conditioned upon - extension of public services which are not yet ublic available. This provision shall not sa tpplyr to pd utility extension which the p j e normally fund. Response: The project continuance was conditioned upon the extension of Sanitary Sewer Service to the project, after the development of the 37 lot, r Riverway Villa First Addition. � el o pe rnts expedited the preparation of p la for the extension of Sanitary Sewer to the project, and coordinated with Spokane County Departments to maximize the futurelregi ia 2 benefits of this extension, above. It was the developers stated intention to have the Riverway Villa recorded prior First Addition constructed and the Final Plat Map recd deer to the September 1st 1994 date. Due to the above, issues which are out of his control this did not occur. However, it is clear to see that sub progressrhas beeno made on the Riverway Villa project, and completion and construction. S realize it is totally your discretionhtoe xtend this Preliminary Plat Map for one year, o. Response Continued WP \94 \GENE.4004.EXT August 16, 1994 Mr. Tom Veljic Page 7 The request herein made is for a three year extension. The next two phases of the Riverway Villa project are substantially designed and nearly ready for submittal. The off Project Sewer has previously been submitted, and it is clear the project will be built in an ongoing and timely manner. You and other staff members have spent, and are about to spend a substantial amount of valuable time researching and rendering your decision. Please consider a three year extension of time for the above referenced project in the interest of time, and expended energy. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter, please feel free to give me a call if you have a question regarding any of the above. Best regards, North I • aho Eng A ' r illt h i I .` , ���� aili `UW II\' fib.. '. _• HUNT MICA Principal MAH:ril WP \94 \GENE.4004.sxz ng, Inc. cc: Gene Martin - Welco Group Inc. Ed Dean - Dean Building Corp. AUG z 31994) sPoKA PLANA, NC L“alty TY INGD EP4 RTME DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR RIVERWALK After Recording Return to: JjL ? HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON, P.S. Attn: Steven R. Rovig 500 Galland Building 1221 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 -2925 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS 1 1.1 Words Defined 1 ARTICLE 2 PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THIS DECLARATION 4 2.1 Property Hereby Subjected to This Declaration 4 2.2 Other Property 4 ARTICLE 3 RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION 3.1 Description of Association 4 3.2 Board of Directors 5 3.3 Membership 5 3.4 Voting 5 3.5 Architectural Review Committee 5 ARTICLE 4 ASSESSMENTS 7 4.1 Purpose of Assessment 7 4.2 Creation of the Lien and Personal Obligation for Assessments 7 4.3 Computation 8 4.4 Revised Budget 9 4.5 Special Assessments 9 4.6 Lien for Assessments 9 4.7 Effect of Nonpayment of Assessments; Remedies of the Association 9 4.8 Date of Commencement of Assessments 10 4.9 Specific Assessments 10 4.10 Budget Deficits During Declarant Control . . 11 ARTICLE 5 MAINTENANCE; CONVEYANCE OF COMMON AREAS TO ASSOCIATION 11 5.1 Association's Responsibility 11 5.2 Property Not Owned by Association 11 5.3 Damaged Caused by Owner 12 5.4 Owner's Responsibility 12 5.5 Conveyance of Common Areas by Declarant to Association 12 - i - ARTICLE 6 USE RESTRICTIONS AND RULES 13 6.1 General /Rules and Regulations 13 6.2 Residential Use 13 6.3 Building and Landscaping Requirements and Restrictions 13 6.4 Signs 14 6.5 Vehicles 14 6.6 Vehicles on Common Areas 15 6.7 Leasing 15 6.8 Occupants Bound 16 6.9 Animals 16 6.10 Nuisance 16 6.11 Unsightly or Unkempt Conditions 1 6.12 Antennas 17 6.13 Tree Removal 17 6.14 Drainage 17 6.15 Sight Distance at Intersections 17 6.16 Garbage Cans, Woodpiles, Etc. 18 6.17 Subdivision of Lot 18 6.18 Guns 18 6.19 Utility Lines 18 6.20 Lighting 18 6.21 Artificial Vegetation, Exterior Sculpture, and Similar Items 19 6.22 Swimming Pools 19 6.23 Mailboxes 19 6.24 Clotheslines 19 6.25 Exterior Security Devices 19 6.26 Construction and Sale Period 19 ARTICLE 7 INSURANCE AND CASUALTY LOSSES 19 7.1 Insurance Coverage 19 7.2 Policy Requirements 21 7.3 Other Insurance 21 7.4 Individual Insurance 21 7.5 Damage and Destruction Insured by Association 22 7.6 Damage and Destruction Insured by Owners 23 7.7 Insurance Deductible 23 ARTICLE 8 CONDEMNATION 23 ARTICLE 9 9.1 9.2 ARTICLE 11 EASEMENTS ANNEXATION OF ADDITIONAL PROPERTY Unilateral Annexation by Declarant Other Annexation ARTICLE 10 MORTGAGEE PROVISIONS 25 10.1 Notices of Action 10.2 No Priority 10.3 Notice to Association 10.4 VA /HUD Approval 10.5 Applicability of Article 10 10.6 Amendments by Board 11.1 Easements for Use and Enjoyment 11.2 Easements for Utilities 11.3 Easement for Entry 11.4 Easement for Maintenance 11.5 Easement for Entry Features 11.6 Construction and Sale Period Easement ARTICLE 12 GENERAL PROVISIONS 29 12.1 Enforcement 29 12.2 Self -Help 29 12.3 Duration 30 12.4 Amendments 30 12.5 Partition 31 12.6 Gender and Grammar 31 12.7 Severability 31 12.8 Captions 32 12.9 Perpetuities 32 12.10 Indemnification 32 12.11 Books and Records 32 12.12 Financial Review 33 12.13 Notice of Sale, Lease or Acquisition 33 12.14 Agreements 33 12.15 Implied Rights 33 12.16 Variances 33 12.17 Litigation 34 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SUBMITTED TO THIS DECLARATION EXHIBIT B ADDITIONAL PROPERTY WHICH MAY BE SUBMITTED TO THIS DECLARATION BY DECLARANT 24 24 24 25 25 25 25 26 26 26 26 27 27 28 28 28 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR RIVERWALK THIS DECLARATION is made on this day of 1994 by STANTON - SPOKANE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Washington limited partnership ( "Declarant "). RECITALS A. Declarant is the owner of that certain real property located in Spokane County, Washington, and more particularly described in Section 2.1 of this Declaration. B. Declarant desires to subject the real property described in Section 2.1 hereof to the provisions of this Declaration to create a residential community of single - family housing (as "single family" is defined below) and related uses as set forth in Section 6.2 hereof and to provide for the subjecting of other real property to the provisions of this Declaration in phases. NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant hereby declares that the real property described in Section 2.1 of this Declaration, including the improvements constructed or to be constructed thereon, is hereby subjected to the provisions of this Declaration and shall be held, sold, transferred, conveyed, used, occupied, and mortgaged or otherwise encumbered subject to the covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, assessments, and liens, hereinafter set forth, which are for the purpose of protecting the value and desirability of, and which shall run with the title to, the real property hereby or hereafter made subject hereto, and shall be binding on all persons having any right, title, or interest in all or any portion of the real property now or hereafter made subject hereto, their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors, successors -in- title, and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of each and every owner of all or any portion thereof. ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS 1.1 Words Defined. The following words,: when used in this Declaration or in any Supplementary Declaration (unless the context shall prohibit), shall have the following meanings: - 1 - 1.1.1 "Association" shall mean Riverwalk Owners Association, a Washington nonprofit corporation, its successors and assigns. 1.1.2 "Board of Directors" or "Board" of the Association shall be the appointed or elected body, as applicable, having its normal meaning under Washington law. 1.1.3 "Bylaws" shall refer to the Bylaws of the Riverwalk Owners Association. 1.1.4 "Common Areas" shall mean any and all real and personal property and easements and other interests therein, together with the facilities and improvements located thereon as designated on any final plat creating any phase of the Community or as otherwise conveyed to the Association for the common use and enjoyment of the Owners. Without limitation, Common Areas shall include all private streets and roads within the Community. 1.1.5 "Community" shall mean and refer to that certain real property and interest therein described in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and (i) such additions thereto as may be made by Declarant by Supplementary Declaration of all or any portion of the real property described in Exhibit B attached hereto; and (ii) such additions thereto as may be made by the Association by Supplementary Declaration. 1.1.6 "Community -Wide Standard" shall mean the standard of conduct, maintenance, or other activity generally prevailing in the Community. Such standard may be more specifically determined by the Board of Directors of the Association. Such determination, however, shall generally be made with reference to the standards originally established by the Declarant. 1.1.7 "Declarant" shall mean and refer to Stanton - Spokane Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership, and its successors -in -title and assigns, provided any such successor -in -title or assign shall acquire for the purpose of development or sale all or any portion of the remaining undeveloped or unsold portions of the real property described in Exhibit A, attached hereto, or in Exhibit B, attached hereto, and provided further, in the instrument of conveyance to any such successor -in -title or assign, such successor -in -title or assign is designated as the "Declarant" hereunder by the grantor of such conveyance, which grantor shall be the "Declarant" hereunder at the time of such conveyance; provided, further, upon such designation of such successor Declarant, all rights of the former Declarant in and to such status as "Declarant" hereunder shall cease, it being understood that as to all of the property described in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and in - 2 - Exhibit B, attached hereto, which is now or hereafter subjected to this Declaration, there shall be only one "Declarant" hereunder at any one point in time. 1.1.8 "Development Period" shall mean that period of time beginning on the date this Declaration is recorded in the records of Spokane County and ending on the earliest to occur of (i) ( ) years from the date of recording of this Declaration; (ii) (_) years after Declarant's last conveyance of record . of a Lot to an Owner; or (iii) the date upon which a Supplementary Declaration is recorded by Declarant terminating the Development Period. 1.1.9 "Lot" shall mean any plot of land within the Community, whether or not improvements are constructed thereon, which constitutes or will constitute, after the construction of improvements, a residential dwelling site as shown on a plat recorded in the records of Spokane County. The ownership of each Lot shall include, and there shall pass with each Lot as an appurtenance thereto, whether or not separately described, all of the right, title, and interest of an Owner in the Common Areas, which shall include, without limitation, membership in the Association. 1.1.10 "Mortgage" means any mortgage, deed of trust, and any and all other similar instruments used for the purpose of encumbering real property in the Community as security for the payment or satisfaction of an obligation. 1.1.11 "Mortgagee" shall mean the holder of a Mortgage. 1.1.12 "Occupant" shall mean any Person occupying all or any portion of a residence or other property located within the Community for any period of time, regardless of whether such Person is a tenant or the Owner of such property. 1.1.13 "Owner" shall mean and refer to the record owner, whether one or more Persons, of the fee simple title to any Lot located within the Community, excluding, however, any Person holding such interest merely as security for the performance or satisfaction of any obligation. 1.1.14 "Person" means any natural person, as well as a corporation, joint venture, partnership (general or limited), association, trust, or other legal entity. 1.1.15 "Single Family" shall mean a single housekeeping unit, without regard to the construction type or ownership of such unit, that includes not more than four (4) adults who are legally unrelated. - 3 - 1.1.16 "Supplementary Declaration" means an amendment or supplement to this Declaration which subjects additional property to this Declaration or imposes, expressly or by reference, additional restrictions and obligations on the land described therein, or both. 1.1.17 "Total Association Vote" means all of the votes attributable to members of the Association (including votes of Declarant), and the consent of Declarant so long as Declarant owns any property for development and /or sale in the Community or has the right to unilaterally annex additional property to the Community. ARTICLE 2 PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THIS DECLARATION 2.1 Property Hereby Subiected to This Declaration. The real property which is, by the recording of this Declaration, subject to the covenants and restrictions hereafter set forth and which, by virtue of the recording of this Declaration, shall be held, transferred, sold, conveyed, used, occupied, and mortgaged or otherwise encumbered subject to this Declaration is the real property described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. 2.2 Other Property. Only the real property described in Section 2.1 above is hereby made subject to this Declaration; provided, however, by one or more Supplementary Declarations, Declarant and the Association have the right, but not the obligation, to subject other real property to this Declaration, as provided in Article 9 below. ARTICLE 3 RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION 3.1 Description of Association. The Association shall be charged with the duties and vested with the powers prescribed by law and set forth in this Declaration, any Supplementary Declaration, and the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Association, all as may be amended from time to time; provided, however, that no such governing documents shall for any reason be amended or otherwise interpreted so as to be inconsistent with this Declaration. - 4 - 3.2 Board of Directors. Declarant shall have the right to appoint or remove any member or members of the Board of Directors or any officer or officers of the Association until termination of the Development Period. Each Owner, by acceptance of a deed to or other conveyance of a Lot vests in Declarant the authority to appoint and remove directors and officers of the Association. The directors selected by the Declarant need not be Owners. The number of directors shall be as set forth in the Bylaws. Follow- ing termination of the Development Period, the Board of Directors shall be elected by the Owners in accordance with the Bylaws. 3.3 Membership. Every Person who is the record owner of a fee or undivided fee interest in any Lot that is subject to this Declaration shall be deemed to have a membership in the Association. The foregoing is not intended to include Persons who hold an interest merely as security for the performance of an obligation, and the giving of a security interest shall not terminate the Owner's membership. No Owner, whether one or more Persons, shall have more than one (1) membership per Lot. In the event of multiple Owners of a Lot, votes and rights of use and enjoyment shall be as provided in this Declaration and in the Bylaws. Membership shall be appurtenant to and may not be separated from ownership of any Lot. The rights and privileges of membership, including the right to vote and to hold office, may be exercised by a member or the member's spouse, but in no event shall more than one (1) vote be cast nor office held for each Lot owned. The first annual meeting of the Association shall be held within sixty (60) days after termination of the Development Period on a date set by the Board pursuant to the Bylaws. 3.4 Voting. Members shall be entitled to one (1) vote, for each Lot owned. When more than one (1) Person holds an ownership interest in any Lot, the vote for such Lot shall be exercised as those Owners themselves determine and advise the Secretary prior to any meeting. In the absence of such advice, the Lot's vote shall be suspended in the event more than one (1) Person seeks to exercise it. 3.5 Architectural Review Committee. No construction, alteration, addition, refurbishing, or erection of any nature whatsoever shall be commenced or placed upon any part of the Community, except that which is installed by the Declarant, or as is approved in accordance with this Section, or as is otherwise expressly permitted herein. Any such construction, alteration, addition, refurbishing, or erection shall not be made unless and until plans and specifications showing the nature, kind, shape, size and height, architectural design and detail, materials, workmanship, colors, location on site, improvement and site grade elevations, and site landscaping shall have been submitted - 5 - in writing to and approved by the Architectural Review Committee established pursuant to this Section 3.5. The Board may employ architects, engineers, or other Persons as it deems necessary to enable the Architectural Review Committee to perform its review. Written design guidelines and procedures ( "Design Guidelines ") shall be established for the exercise of this review, which Design Guidelines may provide for a review fee. The Design Guidelines may vary for different phases of the Community as determined by the Architectural Review Committee and may evolve over time with changes in the market place. 3.5.1 So long as the Declarant owns any property for development and /or sale in the Community or has the right to unilaterally annex additional property to the Community, the Declarant shall have the right to appoint or remove any or all members of the Architectural Review Committee. Upon the expiration or earlier surrender in writing of such right, the Board shall appoint the members of the Architectural Review Committee. 3.5.2 If the Architectural Review Committee fails to approve or to disapprove submitted plans and specifications within sixty (60) days after the plans and specifications have been submitted, which submission shall be evidenced by a written receipt for said plans and specifications, approval will not be required, and this Section will be deemed to have been fully complied with. In this event, any such plans and specifications shall nevertheless be in compliance with all the restrictions contained in this Declaration and any Design Guidelines established by the Architectural Review Committee which are then in effect. 3.5.3 As a condition of approval under this Section, each Owner, on behalf of such Owner and such Owner's successors -in- interest, shall assume all responsibilities for maintenance, repair, replacement, and insurance to and on any change, modification, addition, or alteration. In the discretion of the Architectural Review Committee, an Owner may be made to verify such condition of approval by a recordable written instrument acknowledged by such Owner on behalf of such Owner and such Owner's successors -in- interest. 3.5.4 The Architectural Review Committee shall be the sole arbiter of plans submitted to it and may withhold approval for any reason, including aesthetic considerations, and it shall be entitled to stop any construction in violation of approved plans or this Declaration. Any member of the Architectural Review Committee or the Board or its representatives shall have the right, during reasonable hours and after reasonable notice, to enter upon any property to inspect for the purpose of - 6 - ascertaining whether or not such plans and this Declaration have been or are being complied with. Such Person or Persons shall not be deemed guilty of trespass by reason of such entry. In addition to any other remedies available to the Association, in the event of noncompliance with this Section, the Board may, as provided in Section 12.1 hereof, record a notice of violation naming the violating Owner. 3.5.5 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT APPROVED FOR ENGINEERING OR STRUCTURAL.DESIGN OR QUALITY OF MATERIALS, AND BY APPROVING SUCH PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS•NEITHER THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, THE MEMBERS THEREOF, NOR THE ASSOCIATION ASSUMES LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBILITY THEREFOR, NOR FOR ANY DEFECT IN ANY STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTED FROM SUCH PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. NEITHER DECLARANT, THE ASSOCIATION, THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, THE BOARD, NOR THE OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, MEMBERS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS OF ANY OF THEM SHALL BE LIABLE IN DAMAGES TO ANYONE SUBMITTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO ANY OF THEM FOR APPROVAL, OR TO ANY OWNER OF PROPERTY AFFECTED BY THESE RESTRICTIONS BY REASON OF MISTAKE IN JUDGMENT, NEGLIGENCE, OR NONFEASANCE ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OR FAILURE TO APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE ANY SUCH PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS. EVERY PERSON WHO SUBMITS PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS AND EVERY OWNER AGREES THAT SUCH PERSON OR OWNER WILL NOT BRING ANY ACTION OR SUIT AGAINST DECLARANT, THE ASSOCIATION, THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, THE BOARD, OR THE OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, MEMBERS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS OF ANY OF THEM TO RECOVER ANY DAMAGES AND HEREBY RELEASES, REMISES, QUITCLAIMS, AND COVENANTS NOT TO SUE FOR ALL CLAIMS, DEMANDS, AND CAUSES OF ACTION ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY JUDGMENT, NEGLIGENCE, OR NONFEASANCE AND HEREBY WAIVES THE PROVISIONS OF ANY LAW WHICH PROVIDES THAT A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND THE CLAIMS, DEMANDS, AND CAUSES OF ACTION NOT KNOWN AT THE TIME THE RELEASE I5 GIVEN. ARTICLE 4 ASSESSMENTS 4.1 Purpose of Assessment. The assessments provided for herein shall be used for the general purposes of promoting the recreation, health, safety, welfare, common benefit, and enjoyment of the Owners and occupants of Lots, including the maintenance of real and personal property, all as may be more specifically authorized from time to time by the Board of Directors: 4.2 Creation of the Lien and Personal Obligation for Assessments. Each Owner of any Lot, by acceptance of a deed therefor, whether or not it shall be so expressed in such deed, covenants and agrees to pay to the Association: (i) annual - 7 - assessments or charges; (ii) special assessments, such assessments to be established and collected as hereinafter provided; and (iii) specific assessments established pursuant to the terms of this Declaration, including, but not limited to, reasonable fines imposed in accordance with the terms of this Declaration. 4.2.1 All such assessments, together with (i) late charges, (ii) interest set by the Board, not to exceed the maximum rate permitted by law (but not to exceed eighteen percent (18 %) per annum), and (iii) costs, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees actually incurred, shall be a charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon the Lot against which each assessment is made. 4.2.2 Each such assessment, together with late charges, interest, costs, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees actually incurred, shall also be the personal obligation of the person who was the Owner of such Lot at the time the assessment fell due. Each Owner shall be personally liable for the portion of each assessment coming due while the Owner of a Lot, and each grantee of an Owner shall be jointly and severally liable for such portion thereof as may be due and payable at the time of conveyance; provided, however, the liability of a grantee for the unpaid assessments of its grantor shall not apply to any first Mortgagee taking title through foreclosure proceedings or deed in lieu of foreclosure. 4.2.3 The Association shall, within five (5) days after receiving a written request therefor and for a reasonable charge, furnish a certificate signed by an officer of the Association setting forth whether the assessments on a specified Lot have been paid. Such certificate shall be binding upon the Association as of the date of issuance. 4.2.4 Annual assessments shall be levied equally on all similarly situated Lots (as determined by the Board). However, during the Development Period, the Board may establish greater or lesser assessments for Lots owned by Declarant or builders. Assessments shall be paid in such manner and on such dates as may be fixed by the Board. Unless otherwise provided by the Board, the assessment shall be paid in annual installments. 4.3 Computation. It shall be the duty of the Board to prepare a budget covering the estimated costs of operating the Association during the .coming year, which shall include a capital reserve in accordance with a capital budget separately prepared. The Board shall cause the budget and the assessments to be levied against each Lot for the following year to be delivered to each member at least thirty (30) days prior to the end of the current fiscal year. In the event the Board fails for any reason so to - 8 - determine the budget for the succeeding year, until such time as a budget shall have been determined, the budget in effect for the then current year shall continue for the succeeding year. 4.4 Revised Budget. If the financial circumstances of the Association materially change during any year, the Board may prepare a revised budget for the balance of the year. The Board shall cause the revised budget and assessments to be delivered to each member at least thirty (30) days before their effective date. 4.5 Special Assessments. In addition to the other assessments authorized herein, the Association may levy special assessments for expenses such as, but not limited to, capital improvements from time to time if approved at a meeting by two - thirds (2/3) of the Total Association Vote. Special assessments shall be paid as determined by the Board, and the Board may permit special assessments to be paid in installments extending beyond the fiscal year in which the special assessment is imposed. 4.6 Lien for Assessments. All sums assessed against any Lot pursuant to this Declaration, together with late charges, interest, costs, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees actually incurred, as provided herein, shall be secured by a lien on such Lot in favor of the Association. Such lien shall be superior to all other liens and encumbrances on such Lot, except for (a) liens for ad valorem taxes; or (b) liens for all sums unpaid on a first Mortgage or on any Mortgage to Declarant duly recorded in the records of Spokane County and all amounts advanced pursuant to such Mortgage and secured thereby in accordance with the terms of such instrument. All other Persons acquiring liens or encumbrances on any Lot after the recording of this Declaration shall be deemed to consent that such liens or encumbrances shall be inferior to future liens for assessments, as provided herein, whether or not prior consent is specifically set forth in the instruments creating such liens or encumbrances. 4.7 Effect of Nonpayment of Assessments; Remedies of the Association. Any assessment or installment thereof delinquent for a period of more than ten (10) days shall incur a late charge in an amount as the Board may from time to time determine. The Association shall cause a notice of delinquency to be given to any member who has not paid within ten (10) days following the due date. If the assessment is not paid within thirty (30) days, a lien, as herein provided, shall attach and, in addition, the lien shall include interest set by the Board from time to time, on the principal amount due, late charges, costs of collection, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' - 9 - fees actually incurred, and any other amounts provided or permitted by law. 4.7.1 In the event that the assessment remains unpaid after sixty (60) days, the Association may, as the Board shall determine, institute suit to collect such amounts and /or to foreclose its lien. Each Owner, by acceptance of a deed or as a party to any other type of conveyance, vests in the Association or its agents the right and power to bring all actions against such Owner personally, for the collection of such charges as a debt or to foreclose the aforesaid lien in the same manner as other liens for the improvement of real property. 4.7.2 The lien provided for in this Article shall be in favor of the Association and shall be for the benefit of all other Owners. The Association, acting on behalf of the Owners, shall have the power to bid on the Lot at any foreclosure sale or to acquire, hold, lease, mortgage, or convey the same. 4.7.3 No Owner may waive or otherwise exempt himself from liability for the assessments provided for herein, including, by way of illustration, but not limitation, abandonment of the Lot 4.7.4 All payments shall be applied' first to costs, then to late charges, then to interest and then to delinquent assessments. 4.8 Date of Commencement of Assessments. The assessments provided for herein shall commence as to a Lot subject to this Declaration on the first day of the month following conveyance of such Lot to a Person other than Declarant. The first annual assessment shall be adjusted according to the number of months then remaining in that fiscal year. 4.9 Specific Assessments. The Board shall have the power to levy specific assessments pursuant to this Section 4.9 as, in its discretion, it shall deem appropriate. Fines levied pursuant to Section 12.1 of this Declaration and the costs of maintenance performed by the Association which the Owner is responsible for under Sections 5.3 and 5.4 of this Declaration shall be specific assessments. The Board may also specifically assess Owners for Association expenses as follows: 4.9.1 Expenses of the Association which benefit less than all of the Lots may, in the Board's discretion, be specifically assessed equitably among all of the Lots which are benefitted according to the benefit received. - 10 - 4.9.2 Expenses of the Association which benefit all Lots, but which do not provide an equal benefit to all Lots, may be assessed equitably among all Lots according to the benefit received. 4.10 Budget Deficits During Declarant Control. For so long as the Declarant has the authority to appoint the directors and officers of the Association, Declarant may: (a) advance funds to the Association sufficient to satisfy the deficit, if any, between the actual operating expenses of the Association (but specifically not including an allocation for capital reserves), and the sum of the annual, special and specific assessments collected by the Association in any fiscal year, and such advances shall be evidenced by promissory notes from the Association in favor of the Declarant; or (b) cause the Association to borrow such amount from a commercial lending institution at the then prevailing rates for such a loan in the local area of the Community. ARTICLE 5 MAINTENANCE; CONVEYANCE OF COMMON AREAS TO ASSOCIATION 5.1 Association's Responsibility. The Association shall maintain and keep in good repair the Common Areas. This maintenance shall include, without limitation, maintenance, repair, and replacement, subject to any insurance then in effect, of all landscaping and improvements situated on the Common Areas. The Association shall also maintain: (i) all entry features for the Community including the expenses for water and electricity, if any, provided to all such entry features; (ii) landscaping originally installed by the Declarant which is on Common Areas owned in fee by the Association or on property where an easement has been granted to the Association; and (iii) all facilities serving the Community not dedicated to or maintained by a public entity. The foregoing maintenance shall be performed consistent with the Community -Wide Standard. 5.2 Property Not Owned by Association. The Association shall have the right, but not the obligation, to maintain other property not owned by the Association, whether within or without the Community, where the Board has determined that such maintenance would benefit all Owners. Without limitation of the foregoing, the Association may enter into a joint maintenance agreement with adjoining property owners or associations for the repair, maintenance and replacement of shared facilities or other property. 5.3 Damage Caused by Owner. In the event that the Association determines that the need for maintenance, repair, or replacement, which is the responsibility of the Association hereunder, is caused through the willful or negligent act of an Owner, or the family, guests, lessees, or invitees of any Owner, the Association may perform such maintenance, repair cr replacement at such Owner's sole cost and expense, and all costs thereof shall be added to and become a part of the assessment to which such Owner is subject and shall become a lien against the Lot of such Owner. 5.4 Owner's Responsibility. Except as provided in Sections 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 above, all maintenance of any Lot and all structures, parking areas, landscaping, and other improvements thereon together with the landscaping on any parking strip fronting any such Lot, shall be the sole responsibility of the Owner thereof, who shall provide maintenance consistent with the Community -Wide Standard and this Declaration. In the event that the Board of Directors of the Association determines that any Owner has failed or refused to discharge properly any of such Owner's obligations with regard to the maintenance, repair, or replacement of items for which such Owner is responsible hereunder, the Association shall, except in an emergency situation, give the Owner written notice of the Association's intent to provide such necessary maintenance, repair, or replacement at the Owner's sole cost and expense. The notice shall set forth with reasonable particularity the maintenance, repairs, or replacement deemed necessary. The Owner shall have ten (10) days after receipt of such notice within which to complete such maintenance, repair, or replacement, or, in the event that such maintenance, repair, or replacement is not capable of completion within a ten (10) day period, to commence such work which shall be completed within a reasonable time. If any Owner does not comply with the provisions hereof, the Association may provide any such maintenance, repair, or replacement at such Owner's sole cost and expense, and all costs shall be added to and become a part of the assessment to which such Owner is subject and shall become a lien against the Lot. 5.5 Conveyance of Common Areas by Declarant to Association. The Declarant may transfer or convey to the Association any personal property and any improved or unimproved real property, leasehold, easement, or other property interest. Such conveyance shall be accepted by the Association, and the property -shall thereafter be Common Areas to be maintained by the Association: Declarant shall not be required to make any improvements whatsoever to property to be conveyed and accepted pursuant to this Section. - 12 - ARTICLE 6 USE RESTRICTIONS AND RULES 6.1 General /Rules and Regulations. This Article, beginning at Section 6.2, sets out certain use restrictions which must be complied with by all Owners and Occupants. These use restrictions may only be amended in the manner provided in Section 12.4 hereof regarding amendment of this Declaration. In addition, the Board may, from time to time, without consent of the Owners, promulgate, modify, or delete other use restrictions and rules and regulations applicable to the Community. Such use restrictions and rules shall be distributed to all Owners and Occupants prior to the date that they are to become effective and shall thereafter be binding upon all Owners and Occupants until and unless overruled, cancelled, or modified in a regular or special meeting by a majority of the Total Association Vote. 6.2 Residential Use. Except as provided in this Section, all Lots shall be used for single - family residential purposes exclusively with the exception that certain home occupations will be permitted, subject to the guidelines and rules established by the Board. Such home occupations may be limited to certain business uses, shall not create any disturbance, noise, or unsightliness, shall not unduly increase traffic flow or parking congestion, and shall not be in violation of any of the provisions of the Declaration or Bylaws. 6.3 Building and Landscaping Requirements and Restrictions. All residences constructed within the Community by any Person other than Declarant shall be subject to Design Guidelines which may cover the minimum size, architectural style, scope of improvements, quality of design, materials, workmanship, and siting standards. Such Design Guidelines shall be established by the Architectural Review Committee for the purpose of establishing a Community of harmonious design. Without restricting or limiting the authority of the Architectural Review Committee pursuant to Section 3.5 in approving or disapproving of any specific proposal, the following restrictions shall apply to the Community in general: 6.3.1 Any residence or other structure erected or placed on any Lot shall be completed as to external appearance, including finished painting, within six (6) months after the date of commencement of construction. All front, side and rear yards landscaping must be completed within one (1) year from the date of closing of the purchase of the residence by the Owner from the Declarant or any other builder. - 13 - 6.3.2 Setback requirements for all Lots shall be as provided in applicable ordinances of Spokane County. 6.3.3 All homes within the Community shall contain a garage; carports shall not be permitted. Unless otherwise approved by the Architectural Review Committee, all garages must be attached to, or incorporated in and made a part of, the residence constructed upon a Lot. In granting waivers to this requirement, the Architectural Review Committee will consider functional necessity and architectural desirability. 6.3.4 No fence, fencing -type barrier, or hedge of any kind in excess of six (6) feet high or extending into the front yard of any residence shall be erected, allowed or maintained upon any Lot, without the prior written consent of the Architectural Review Committee. Any such fence, barrier, row of trees, or hedge shall be strictly in compliance with Design Guidelines established by the Architectural Review Committee, which standards may provide for limited acceptable styles and /or specifications. 6.3.5 Any change to the exterior color of any improvement located on a Lot, including, without limitation, the dwelling, must be approved by the Architectural Review Committee. 6.4 Sians. No sign of any kind shall be erected by an Owner or Occupant within the Community without the prior written consent of the Architectural Review Committee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board and the Declarant shall have the right to erect reasonable and appropriate signs including, without limitation, signs related to Declarant's development and marketing of residences within the Community. In addition, "For Sale" and "For Rent" signs and security signs consistent with the Community - wide Standard and any signs required by legal proceedings may be erected upon any Lot. 6.5 Vehicles. The term "vehicles" as used herein shall include, without limitation, automobiles, vans, campers, trucks, buses, motor homes, mobile homes, boats, trailers, portable aircraft, motorcycles, snowmobiles, minibikes, scooters, go- carts, and any other towed or self propelled transportation type vehicle. The term "passenger vehicles" as used herein shall include passenger automobiles, vans, small trucks, motorcycles, and similar type vehicles used regularly and primarily as transportation for the Occupants of the Lot. Vehicles-used for commercial and recreational purposes are not considered passenger vehicles. "Parking areas" shall refer to the number of garage parking spaces and driveway areas in front of garages. However, driveway areas shall be considered "parking areas" for passenger vehicles only and only to the extent that sufficient parking - 14 - spaces are not provided in the garage for all the vehicles used by the Occupants of the Lot. 6.5.1 No vehicles other than passenger vehicles in regular use may be parked on any Lot or portion of the Community, except in parking areas on Lots, or in a screened area on a Lot, if such screened area is approved by the Architectural Review Committee. Any vehicle regularly parked in an unapproved area or for longer than twelve (12) consecutive hours shall be considered a nuisance and may be removed from the Community. 6.5.2 Passenger vehicles parked overnight or for more than eight (8) consecutive hours shall be parked in garages to the extent that garage parking areas are provided and not occupied by other vehicles used by the Occupant of the Lot. No passenger vehicles may be parked on any Lot or pertion of the Community except in "parking areas" as defined in this Section. 6.5.3 Any passenger vehicle which is inoperable or unlicensed and not capable of use on the public highways and which is parked on any Lot for a period of more than forty -eight (48) hours shall be treated the same as a non - passenger vehicle and shall be considered a nuisance and may be removed from the Community. 6.5.4 The Board shall adopt and maintain current rules and regulations concerning the parking and storage of vehicles on any Lot or any portion cf the Community. Said rules are to protect the Community from the potentially adverse impacts of vehicles on the Community environment and to accommodate the evolving nature and use of such vehicles. Such rules and regulations may provide for exceptions and /or modifications to the conditions of this Section as determined in the sole discretion of the Board. The Board shall rule on any dispute as to the interpretation or application of this Section and all rules and regulations established by the Board with respect to vehicles. 6.6 Vehicles on Common Areas. No motorized vehicles shall be permitted on pathways or unpaved Common Areas except vehicles being used for the limited purpose of operating and maintaining utilities. 6.7 Leasing. Lots may be leased for residential purposes. All leases shall have a minimum term of at least three months. All leases shall require, without limitation, that the tenant acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Declaration, Bylaws, and rules and regulations of the Association. The lease shall also obligate the tenant to comply with the foregoing and shall provide that in the event of noncompliance, the Board, in addition to - 15 - any other remedies available to it, may evict the tenant on behalf of the Owner and specifically assess all costs associated therewith against the Owner and the Owner's property. 6.8 Occupants Bound. All provisions of the Declaration, Bylaws, and of any rules and regulations, which govern the conduct of Owners and which provide for sanctions against Owners shall also apply to all Occupants. Fines may be levied against Owners or Occupants. If a fine is first levied against an Occupant and is not paid timely, the fine may then be levied against the Owner. 6.9 Animals. No animals, livestock or poultry of any kind shall be raised, bred or kept in the Community; provided, however, that conventional household pets may be kept on a Lot subject to the following restrictions: Pets shall not be kept, bred or maintained for any commercial purposes. Owners shall be responsible for the immediate cleanup and removal of all fecal matter deposited by pets on any property other than the Lot of the Owner of the pet. Pets shall be confined in the Owner's Lot in a dog run, or otherwise, unless on a leash and accompanied by a responsible person. No domestic pet may be kept if it is a source of annoyance or a nuisance. The Board shall have the authority to determine whether a particular pet is a nuisance or a source of annoyance, and such determination shall be final and conclusive. Pets shall be attended at all times and shall be registered, licensed and inoculated from time to time as required by law. 6.10 Nuisance. Each Owner and Occupant shall prevent the development of any unclean, unhealthy, unsightly, or unkept condition on his or her Lot. No Lot shall be used, in whole or in part, for the storage of any property or thing that will cause such Lot to appear to be in an unclean or untidy condition; nor shall any substance, thing, or material be kept that will emit foul or obnoxious odors or that will cause any noise or other condition that will or might disturb the peace, quiet, safety, comfort, or serenity of the occupants of surrounding property. No illegal, illicit, noxious or offensive activity shall be carried on within the Community, nor shall anything be done tending to cause embarrassment, discomfort, annoyance, or nuisance to any Person using any property within the Community. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, no speaker, horn, whistle, siren, bell, amplifier or other sound device, except such devices as may be used exclusively for sectrity purposes, shall be located, installed or maintained upon the exterior of any Lot unless required by law or unless specifically approved by the Architectural Review Committee. - 16 - 6.11 Unsightly or Unkempt Conditions. The pursuit of hobbies or other activities, including specifically, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the assembly of and disassembly of motor vehicles and other mechanical devices, which might tend to cause disorderly, unsightly, or unkept conditions, shall not be undertaken outside of homes or garages. Garage doors shall be kept closed at all times unless they are in use. In addition, the storage of equipment, machinery, constructions supplies or any similar material on a Lot outside of the home and garage constructed thereon is strictly prohibited except as required during the remodeling or refurbishing of improvements on such Lot and then for not more than sixty (60) days. 6.12 Antennas. No television or radio antenna, tower, satellite dish, or exterior antenna of any kind shall be placed, allowed, or maintained upon any Lot or any portion of the Community without the prior written consent of the Architectural Review Committee. Each Owner and Occupant acknowledges that this provision benefits all Owners and Occupants and each Owner and Occupant agrees to comply with this provision despite the fact that the erection of an outdoor antenna or similar device would be the most cost - effective way to transmit or receive the signals sought to be transmitted or received. 6.13 Tree Removal. No trees that are more than six (6) inches in diameter at a point three (3) feet above the ground shall be removed without the prior written consent of the Architectural Review Committee. Notwithstanding all of the above, no consent or approval is required for the removal by an Owner of any trees, regardless of their diameter, that are located within ten (10) feet of the Owner's residence. 6.14 Drainage. Catch basins and drainage areas are for the purpose of natural flow of water only. No obstructions or debris shall be placed in these areas. No Owner or Occupant may obstruct or rechannel the drainage flows after location and installation of drainage swales, storm sewers or storm drains. Declarant hereby reserves for the benefit of Declarant and the Association and their respective successors and assigns a perpetual easement across all Common Areas and Lots for the purpose of maintaining or altering drainage and water flow. • 6.15 Sight Distance at Intersections. All property located at street intersections shall be landscaped so as to permit safe sight across the street corners. No fence, wall, hedge or shrub planting shall be placed or permitted to remain where it would - 17 - create a traffic or sight problem as determined by the Architectural Review Committee in its sole discretion. 6.16 Garbage Cans. Woodpiles, Etc. All garbage cans, woodpiles, air - conditioning compressors, machinery, equipment and other similar items related to the operation of the residence shall be located or screened so as to be concealed from view from the street abutting the Lot on which such items are located. All rubbish, trash, and garbage shall be regularly removed and shall not be allowed to accumulate. Trash, garbage, debris, or other waste matter of any kind may not be burned within the Community. This Section 6.16 is subject to all rights granted and reserved pursuant to Section 11.6 below. 6.17 Subdivision of Lot. No Lot shall be subdivided or its boundary lines changed except with the prior written approval of the Architectural Review Committee. Declarant, however, hereby expressly reserves the right to replat any Lot or Lots owned by Declarant. Any such division, boundary line change, or replatting shall not be in violation of the applicable subdivision and zoning regulations. 6.18 Guns. The use of firearms in the Community is prohibited. The term "firearms" includes without limitation BB guns, pellet guns, and small firearms of all types. 6.19 Utilities. 6.19.1 Except as may be permitted by the Architectural Review Committee, no overhead utility lines, including lines for cable television, shall be permitted within the Community, except for temporary lines as required during construction. 6.19.2 The use of private wells and water systems within the Community is prohibited. In addition, Owners are subject to and shall comply with certain conditions of approval of Spokane County with respect to sewer and stormwater control facilities as set forth on the applicable plat of the phase in which such Owner's Lot is located. 6.20 Lighting. Except as may be permitted by the Architectural Review Committee, exterior lighting shall not be permitted except for (i) two (2) decorative post lights, (ii) street lights in conformity with an established street lighting program for the Community; (iii) seasonal decorative lights; or (iv) front house illumination of model homes. Other decorative yard lighting shall be permissible subject to prior approval of the Architectural Review Committee. - 18 - 6.21 Artificial Vegetation, Exterior Sculpture. and Similar Items. No artificial vegetation, exterior sculpture, fountains, flags, and similar items shall be permitted in the front yard of any Lot unless approved by the Architectural Review Committee. 6.22 Swimming Pools. Swimming pools and hot tubs shall be constructed, erected or maintained upon any Lot only with the prior written consent of the Architectural Review Committee. The Architectural Review Committee may disallow any swimming pool or hot tubs which the Committee determines will be contrary to the best interests of the Community.- The Architectural Review Committee shall have the authority to establish rules and regulations governing the use of any such facilities. Considerations shall include, but not be limited to, the visual and audio intrusion such a facility and associated activities would have on surrounding residences. 6.23 Mailboxes. All mailboxes located on Lots shall be of a style approved by the Architectural Review Committee. Mailboxes shall be attached only to stands provided and maintained by the Association in designated locations. 6.24 Clotheslines. No exterior clotheslines of any type shall be permitted upon any Lot. 6.25 Exterior Security Devices. No exterior security devices, including, without limitation, window bars, shall be permitted on any residence or Lot. Signs placed on the Lot or the exterior of the residence stating that such residence is protected by a security system are permissible. 6.26 Construction and Sale Period. Until Declarant's right unilaterally to subject property to this Declaration as provided in Article 9 terminates and thereafter so long as Declarant owns any property in the Community for development and /or sale, the restrictions set forth in this Article 6 shall not be applied or interpreted so as to prevent, hinder or interfere with development, construction and sales activities of Declarant or any builder or developer approved by Declarant. ARTICLE 7 INSURANCE AND CASUALTY LOSSES - 19 - 7.1 Insurance Coverage. The Board of Directors or the duly authorized agent of the Association shall have the authority to and shall obtain or cause to be obtained insurance as follows: 7.1.1 The Board shall obtain insurance on all insurable buildings and, where the Board deems there to be a reasonable risk, other substantial structures whether or not such buildings or structures are located on the Common Areas and which the Association is obligated to maintain. Insurance on buildings shall provide, at minimum, fire and extended coverage, including vandalism and malicious mischief, and shall be in an amount sufficient to cover the full replacement cost of any repair or reconstruction in the event of damage or destruction from any such hazard. Insurance on other substantial structures shall cover those risks deemed advisable by the Board and shall be in such amounts as are deemed advisable by the Board. The Board may insure other types of improvements, including entry monuments, landscaping, and the like, as it deems advisable. With respect to such other improvements, the Board shall determine the risks to be insured and the amounts of insurance to be carried. 7.1.2 The Board shall obtain a public liability policy applicable to the Common Areas covering the Association and its members for all damage or injury caused by the negligence of the Association or any of its members or agents, and, if reasonably available, directors' and officers' liability insurance. The pubic liability policy shall have a combined single limit of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00). 7.1.3 The Board is hereby authorized to contract with or otherwise arrange to obtain the insurance coverage required hereunder through the Declarant and to reimburse Declarant for the cost thereof, and Declarant shall be authorized, but not obligated, to purchase such insurance coverage for the benefit of the Association and the Owners upon Declarant and the Association agreeing upon the terms and conditions applicable to reimbursement by the Association for costs incurred by Declarant in obtaining such coverage. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Declaration to the contrary, the Board shall not be required to comply with the provisions of this Article if the Board has contracted for or otherwise arranged to obtain the required insurance coverage through the Declarant. 7.1.4 Premiums for all insurance shall be common expenses of the Association. The policies may contain a reasonable deductible, and the amount thereof shall not be subtracted from the face amount of the policy in determining whether the insurance at least equals the full replacement cost. 7.1.5 In the event insurance premiums in connection with the insurance required by this Article 7 become prohibitive, in the judgment of the Board, the Board may with approval of seventy -five percent (75 %) of the Total Association Vote reduce - 20 - the amount of the required insurance, self- insure itself, or discontinue the insurance all together. 7.2 Policy Requirements. All such insurance coverage obtained by the Board of Directors shall be written in the name of the Association, as trustee for the respective benefitted parties. Such insurance shall be governed by the provisions hereinafter set forth: 7.2.1 All policies shall be written with a company authorized to do business in Washington 7.2.2 Exclusive authority to adjust losses under policies obtained by the Association shall be vested in the Association's Board of Directors; provided, however, no Mortgagee having an interest in such losses may be prohibited from participating in the settlement negotiations, if any, related thereto. 7.2.3 In no event shall the insurance coverage obtained and maintained by the Association's Board of Directors hereunder be brought into contribution with insurance purchased by individual Owners, occupants, or their Mortgagees, and the insurance carried by the Association shall be primary. 7.2.4 All casualty insurance policies shall have an inflation guard endorsement and an agreed amount endorsement if these are reasonably available and all insurance policies shall be reviewed annually by one or more cualified persons, at least one of whom must be in the real estate industry and familiar with construction in Spokane County. 7.3 Other Insurance. In addition to the other insurance required by this Article 7, the Board shall obtain worker's compensation insurance, if and to the extent necessary to satisfy the requirements of applicable laws. The Board may, in its discretion, obtain a fidelity bond or bonds on directors, . officers, employees, and other persons handling or responsible for the Association's funds, if reasonably available. The Association shall obtain additional insurance coverage, if and to the extent necessary to satisfy the requirements of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, the Federal National Mortgage Association, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, or the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 7.4 Individual Insurance. By virtue of taking title to a Lot subject to the terms of this Declaration, each Owner acknowledges that the Association has no obligation to provide any insurance for any portion of individual Lots, and each Owner covenants and agrees with all other Owners and with the - 21 - Association that each Owner shall at a minimum, carry fire and extended coverage casualty insurance on the Lot and all structures constructed thereon in an amount sufficient to cover the full replacement costs of any repair or reconstruction in the event of damage or destruction from any such hazard. 7.5 Damace and Destruction: -- Insured by Association. 7.5.1 Immediately after damage or destruction by fire or other casualty to all or any portion of any improvement covered by insurance written in the name of the- Association, the Board of Directors or its duly authorized agent shall proceed with the .filing and adjustment of all claims arising under such insurance and obtain reliable- -and detailed estimates of the cost of repair or reconstruction of the damaged or destroyed property. Repair or reconstruction, as used in this Section, means repairing or restoring the property to substantially the same condition and location that existed prior to the fire or other casualty, allowing for any changes or improvements necessitated by changes in applicable building codes. The Board of Directors shall have the enforcement powers specified in Section 7.2 of this Declaration necessary to enforce this provision. 7.5.2 Any damage or destruction to property covered by insurance written in the name of the Association shall be repaired or reconstructed unless, within sixty (60) days after the casualty, at least seventy -five percent (75 %) of the Total Association vote otherwise agree. If for any reason either the amount of the insurance proceeds to be paid as a result of such damage or destruction, or reliable and detailed estimates of the cost of repair or reconstruction, or both, are not made available to the Association within such period, then the period shall be extended until such information shall be made available; provided, however, such extension shall not exceed sixty (60) days. No Mortgagee shall have the right to participate in the determination of whether damage or destruction shall be repaired or reconstructed. 7.5.3 If the damage or destruction for which the insurance proceeds are paid is to be repaired or reconstructed and such proceeds are not sufficient to defray the cost thereof, the Board of Directors shall, without the necessity of a vote of the Association's members, levy a special assessment against all Owners in proportion to the number of Lots owned by such Owners. Additional assessments may be made in like manner at any time during or following the completion of any repair or reconstruction. If the funds available from insurance exceed the costs of repair or reconstruction or if the improvements are not repaired or reconstructed, such excess shall be deposited to the benefit of the Association. - 22 - 7.5.4 In the event that it should be determined by the Association in the manner described above that the damage or destruction shall not be repaired or reconstructed and no alternative improvements are authorized, then and in that event the property shall be restored to its natural state and maintained as an undeveloped portion of the Community by the Association in a neat and attractive condition. 7.6 damage and Destruction -- Insured by Owners. The damage or destruction by fire or other casualty to all or any portion of any improvement on a Lot shall be repaired by the Owner thereof within seventy -five (75) days after such damage or destruction or, where repairs cannot be completed within seventy -five (75) days, they shall be commenced within such period and shall be completed within a reasonable time thereafter. Alternatively, the Owner may elect to demolish all improvements on the Lot and remove all debris therefrom within seventy -five, (75) days after such damage or destruction. In the event of noncompliance with this provision, the Board of Directors shall have all enforcement powers specified herein. 7.7 Insurance Deductible. The deductible for any casualty insurance policy carried by the Association shall, in the event of damage or destruction, be allocated among the Persons who are responsible hereunder, or be a common expense of the Association. ARTICLE 8 CONDEMNATION In the event of a taking by eminent domain of any portion of the Common Areas on which improvements have been constructed, then, unless within sixty (60) days after such taking, at least seventy -five percent (75 %) of the Total Association Vote shall otherwise agree, the Association shall restore cr replace such improvements so taken on the remaining land included in the Common Areas to the extent lands are available therefor. The provisions of Section 7.5, above, applicable to Common Areas improvements damage, shall govern replacement or restoration and the actions to be taken in the event that the improvements are not restored or replaced. - 23 - ARTICLE 9 ANNEXATION OF ADDITIONAL PROPERTY 9.1 Unilateral Annexation by Declarant. 9.1.1 As the owner thereof or, if not the owner, with the consent of the owner thereof, Declarant shall have the unilateral right, privilege, and option from time to time at any time until fifteen (15) years after the recording of this Declaration to subject all or any portion of the real property described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof to the provisions of this Declaration by recording a Supplementary Declaration describing the property being subjected. Any such annexation shall be effective upon the filing for record of such Supplementary Declaration unless otherwise provided therein. As long as covenants applicable to the real property previously subjected to this Declaration are not changed, the Declarant may unilaterally amend this Declaration to reflect the different character of any such annexed real property. 9.1.2 The rights reserved unto Declarant to subject additional land to the Declaration shall not impose any obligation upon Declarant to subject any of such additional land to this Declaration or to the jurisdiction of the Association. If such additional land is not subjected to this Declaration, Declarant's reserved rights shall not impose any obligation on Declarant to impose any covenants and restrictions similar to those contained herein upon such additional land nor shall such rights in any manner limit or restrict the use to which such additional land may be put by Declarant or any subsequent owner thereof, whether such uses are consistent with the covenants and restrictions imposed hereby or not. 9.2 Other Annexation. Subject to the consent of the owner(s) thereof and the consent of the Declarant (so long as the Declarant owns any property for development and /or sale in the Community or has the right to unilaterally annex additional property to the Community), upon the affirmative vote or written consent, or any combination thereof, of seventy -five percent (75 %) of the Total Association Vote, the Association may annex real property to the provisions of this Declaration and the jurisdiction of the Association by filing for record a Supplementary Declaration describing the property being annexed. Any such Supplementary Declaration shall be signed by the President of the Association whose signature shall be attested by the Secretary of the Association, and any such annexation shall be effective only upon the filing for record of such Supplementary Declaration, unless a later effective date is provided therein. - 24 - ARTICLE 10 MORTGAGEE PROVISIONS The following provisions are for the benefit of holders of first Mortgages on Lots in the Community. The provisions of this Article apply to both this Declaration and to the Bylaws, notwithstanding any other provisions contained therein. 10.1 Notices of Action. An institutional holder, insurer, or guarantor of a first Mortgage, who provides a written request to the Association (such request to state the name and address of such holder, insurer, or guarantor and the Lot number, therefore becoming an "eligible holder "), will be entitled to timely written report as to the current status of said Lot with respect to the following: 10.1.1 Any condemnation loss or any casualty loss which affects a material portion of the Community or which affects any Lot on which there is a first Mortgage held, insured, or guaranteed by such eligible holder; 10.1.2 Any delinquency in the payment of assessments or charges owed by an Owner of a Lot subject to the Mortgage of such eligible holder. 10.2 No Priority. No provision of this Declaration or the Bylaws gives or shall be construed as giving any Owner or other party priority over any rights of the first Mortgagee of any Lot in the case of distribution to such Owner of insurance proceeds or condemnation awards for losses to or a taking of the Common Areas. 10.3 Notice to Association. Upon request, each Lot Owner shall be obligated to furnish to the Association the name and address of the holder of any Mortgage encumbering such Owner's Lot. 10.4 VA /HUD Approval. As long as the Declarant has the right to appoint and remove the directors of the Association and so long as the project is approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ( "HUD ") for insuring or the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs ( "VA ") for guaranteeing any Mortgage in the Community the following actions shall require the prior approval of the VA and /or HUD as applicable: annexation of additional property to the Community, except for annexation by Declarant in accordance with Section 9.1 hereof; dedication of Common Areas to any public entity; mergers and consolidations; - 25 - dissolution of the Association, and material amendment of the Declaration, Bylaws or Articles of Incorporation. 10.5 Applicability of Article 10. Nothing contained in this Article shall be construed to reduce the percentage vote that must otherwise be obtained under the Declaration, Bylaws, or Washington law for any of the acts set out in this Article. 10.6 Amendments by Board. Should the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, HUD or VA subsequently delete any of their respective requirements which necessitate the provisions of this Article or make any such requirements less stringent, the Board, without approval of the Owners, may cause an amendment to this Article to be recorded to reflect such changes. ARTICLE 11 EASEMENTS 11.1 Easements for Use and Eniovment. 11.1.1 Every Owner of a Lot shall have a right and easement of ingress and egress, use and enjoyment in and to the Common Areas which shall be appurtenant to and shall pass with the title to each Lot, subject to the following provisions: 11.1.1.1 the right of the Association to charge reasonable fees for the use of any portion of the Common Areas, to limit the number of guests of Lot Owners and tenants who may use the Common Areas, and to provide for the exclusive use and enjoyment of specific portions thereof at certain designated times by an Owner, his family, tenants, guests, and invitees; 11.1.1.2 the right of the Association to suspend the voting rights of an Owner and the right of an Owner to use certain Common Areas for any period during which any assessment against such Owner's Lot remains. unpaid; 11.1.1.3 the right of the Association to borrow money for the purpose of improving the Common Areas, or any portion thereof, or for construction, repairing or improving any facilities located or to be located thereon, and to give as security for the payment of any such loan a Mortgage conveying all or any portion of the Common Areas; provided, however, the lien and encumbrance of any such Mortgage given by the Association shall be subject and subordinate to any rights, interests, options, easements and privileges - 26 - herein reserved or established for the benefit of Declarant, or any Lot or Lot Owner, or the holder of any Mortgage, irrespective of when executed, given by Declarant or any Lot Owner encumbering any Lot or other property located within the Community; and 11.1.1.4 the right of the Association to dedicate or transfer all or any portion of the Common Areas subject to such conditions as may be agreed to by the members of the Association. No such dedication or transfer shall be effective unless an instrument agreeing to such dedication or transfer has been approved by the affirmative vote of at least seventy -five percent (75 %) of the Total Association Vote; provided, however, that during the Development Period, Declarant may, on its sole signature, dedicate or transfer portions of the Common Areas, so long as such transfer or dedication does not materially and adversely affect the Association or any Lot Owner. 11.1.2 Any Lot Owner may delegate such Owner's right of use and enjoyment in and to the Common Areas and facilities located thereon to the members of such Owner's family and to such Owner's tenants and guests and shall be deemed to have made a delegation of all such rights to the Occupants of such Owner's Lot, if leased. 11.2 Easements for Utilities. There is hereby reserved to the Declarant, the Association and any utility providers designated by either the Declarant or the Association blanket easements upon, across, above and under all property within the Community for access, ingress, egress, installation, repairing, replacing, and maintaining all utilities serving the Community or any portion thereof, including, but not limited to, gas, water, sanitary sewer, telephone and electricity. It shall be expressly permissible for the Declarant, the Association, or the designee of either, as the case may be, to install, repair, replace, and maintain or to authorize the installation, repairing, replacing, and maintaining of such wires, conduits, cables and other equipment related to the providing of any such utility or service. This easement shall be utilized so as to not unreasonably interfere with improvements constructed upon any Lot and the building envelope for any unimproved Lot. Should any party furnishing any such utility or service request a specific license or easement by separate recordable document, the Board shall have the right to grant such easement. 11.3 Easement for Entry. In addition to the right of the Board to exercise self -help as provided in Section 12.2 hereof, the Board shall have the right, but shall not be obligated, to enter upon any property within the Community for emergency, - 27 - security, and safety reasons, which right may be exercised by police officers, fire fighters, ambulance personnel, and similar emergency personnel in the performance of their respective duties. Except in an emergency situation, entry shall only be during reasonable hours and after notice to the Owner, and the entering party shall be responsible for any damage caused. 11.4 Easement for Maintenance. Declarant hereby expressly reserves a perpetual easement for the benefit of the Association across such portions of the Community, determined in the sole discretion of the Association, as are necessary to allow for the maintenance required under Article 5. Such maintenance shall be performed with a minimum of interference to the quiet enjoyment of Owner's property, reasonable steps shall be taken to protect such property, and damage shall be repaired by the Person causing the damage at its sole expense. 11.5 Easement for Entry Features. There is hereby reserved to the Declarant and the Association an easement for ingress,_ egress, installation, construction, landscaping and maintenance of entry features and similar street - scapes for the Community, as more fully described on the recorded subdivision plats for the Community or any other recorded instrument, easement or conveyance. The easement and right herein reserved shall include the right to cut, remove and plant trees, shrubbery, flowers and other vegetation around such entry features and the right to grade the land under and around such entry features. 11.6 Construction and Sale Period Easement. Notwithstanding any provisions contained in this Declaration, the Bylaws, Articles of Incorporation, rules and regulations, design guidelines, and any amendments thereto, until Declarant's right unilaterally to subject property to this Declaration as provided in Article 9 terminates and thereafter so long as Declarant owns any property in the Community for development and /or sale, Declarant reserves an easement across all Community property for Declarant and any builder or developer approved by Declarant to maintain and carry on, upon such portion of the Community as Declarant may reasonably deem necessary, such facilities and activities as in the sole opinion of Declarant may be required, convenient, or incidental to Declarant's and such builder's or developer's development, construction, and sales activities related to property described on Exhibit A and Exhibit B to this Declaration, including, but without limitation: the right of access, ingress and egress for vehicular and pedestrian traffic and construction activities over, under, on or in the Community, including, without limitation, any Lot; the right to tie into any portion of the Community with driveways, parking areas and walkways; the right to tie into and /or otherwise connect and use (without a tap -on or any other fee for so doing), replace, relocate, maintain and repair any device which provides utility or similar services including, without limitation, electrical, telephone, natural gas, water, sewer and drainage lines and facilities constructed or installed in, on, under and /or over the Community; the right to carry on sales and promotional activities in the Community; and the right to construct and operate business offices, signs, construction trailers, model residences, and sales offices. Declarant and any such builder or developer may use residences, offices, or other buildings owned or leased by Declarant or such builder or developer as model residences and sales offices. Rights exercised pursuant to such reserved easement shall be exercised with a minimum of interference to the quiet enjoyment of affected property, reasonable steps shall be taken to protect such property, and damage shall be repaired by the Person causing the damage at its sole expense. During the Development Period, this Section shall not be amended without the Declarant's express written consent. ARTICLE 12 GENERAL PROVISIONS 12.1 Enforcement. Each Owner and Occupant shall comply strictly with the Association's Bylaws, rules and regulations, the use restrictions, as they may be lawfully amended or modified from time to time, and with the covenants, conditions, and restrictions set forth in this Declaration and in the deed to such Owner's Lot, if any. The Board of Directors may impose fines or other sanctions, which shall be collected as provided herein for the collection of assessments. Failure to comply with this Declaration, the Bylaws or the rules and regulations shall be grounds for an action to recover sums due for damages or injunctive relief, or both, maintainable by the Board of Directors, on behalf of the Association, or, in a proper case, by an aggrieved Owner. Failure by the Association or any Owner to enforce any of the foregoing shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. The Board shall have the right to record a notice of violation of the Declaration, Bylaws, rules and regulations, or design guidelines and to assess the cost of recording and removing such notice against the Owner who is responsible (or whose Occupants are responsible) for violating the foregoing. 12.2 Self -Help. In addition to any other remedies provided for herein, the Association or its duly authorized agent shall have the power to enter upon any Lot or any other portion of the Community to abate or remove, any structure, thing or condition which violates this Declaration, the Bylaws, or the Association's rules and regulations. Unless an emergency situation exists, - 29 - the Board shall give the violating Owner ten (10) days' written notice of its intent to exercise self -help. Notwithstanding the foregoing, vehicles may be towed after reasonable notice. All costs of self -help, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees actually incurred, shall be assessed against the violating Owner and shall be collected as provided for herein for the collection of assessments. 12.3 Duration. This Declaration shall run with and bind the Community, and shall inure to the benefit of and shall be enforceable by the Association or any Owner, their respective legal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns, perpetually to the extent provided by law; provided, however, so long as and to the extent that Washington law limits the period during which covenants restricting land to certain uses may run, any provisions of this Declaration affected thereby shall run with and bind the land so long as permitted by such law, after which time, any such provision shall be (a) automatically extended (to the extent allowed by applicable law) for successive periods of ten (10) years, unless a written instrument reflecting disapproval signed by the then Owners of at least two - thirds (2/3) of the Lots and the Declarant (so long as the Declarant owns any property for development and /or sale in the Community or has the right to unilaterally annex additional property to the Community) has been recorded within the year immediately preceding the beginning of a ten (10) year renewal period agreeing to change such provisions, in whole or in part, or to terminate the same, in which case this Declaration shall be modified or terminated to the extent specified therein; or (b) extended as otherwise provided by law. Every purchaser or grantee of any interest (including, without limitation, a security interest) in any real property subject to this Declaration, by acceptance of a deed or other conveyance therefor, thereby agrees that such provisions of this Declaration may be extended and renewed as provided in this Section. 12.4 Amendments. 12.4.1 This Declaration may be amended unilaterally at any time and from time to time by Declarant (i) if such amendment is necessary to bring any provision hereof into compliance with any applicable governmental statute, rule, or regulation or judicial determination which shall be in conflict therewith; (ii) if such amendment is necessary to enable any title insurance company to issue title insurance coverage with respect to the Lots subject to this Declaration; (iii) if such amendment is required by an institutional or governmental lender or purchaser of mortgage loans, including, for example, the Federal National Mortgage Association or Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, to enable such lender or purchaser to make - 30 - or purchase Mortgage loans on the Lots subject to this Declaration; or (iv) if such amendment is necessary to enable any governmental agency or private insurance company to insure or guarantee Mortgage loans on the Lots subject to this Declaration; provided, however, any such amendment shall not adversely affect the title to any Owner's Lot unless any such Lot Owner shall consent thereto in writing. Further, so long as Declarant owns any property for development and /or sale in the Community or has the right unilaterally to subject additional property to this Declaration as provided in Article 9 hereof, Declarant may unilaterally amend this Declaration for any other purpose; provided, however, any such amendment shall not materially adversely affect the substantive rights of any Lot Owners hereunder, nor shall it adversely affect title to any Lot without the consent of the affected Lot Owner. 12.4.2 This Declaration may also be amended upon the affirmative vote or written consent, or any combination thereof, of the Owners of at least seventy -five percent (75 %) of the Total Association Vote and the consent of Declarant (so long as the Declarant owns any property for development and /or sale in the Community or has the right to unilaterally annex additional property to the Community). Amendments to this Declaration shall become effective upon recordation, unless a later effective date is specified therein. 12.5 Partition. The Common Areas shall remain undivided, and no Owner nor any other Person shall bring any action for partition or division of the whole or any part thereof without the written consent of all owners of all portions of the property located within the Community and without the written consent of all holders of all Mortgages encumbering any portion of the property, including, but not necessarily limited to, the Lots located within the Community. 12.6 Gender and Grammar. The singular, wherever used herein, shall be construed to mean the plural, when applicable, and the use of the masculine pronoun shall include the neuter and feminine. 12.7 Severability. whenever possible, each provision of this Declaration shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid, but if the application of any provision of this Declaration to any person or to any property shall be prohibited or held invalid, such prohibition or invalidity shall not affect any other provision or the application of any provision which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and, to this end, the provisions of this Declaration are declared to be severable. - 31 - 12.8 Captions. The captions of each Article and Section hereof, as to the contents of each Article and Section, are inserted only for convenience and are in no way to be construed as defining, limiting, extending, or otherwise modifying or adding to the particular Article or Section to which they refer. 12.9 Perpetuities. If any of the covenants, conditions, restrictions, or other provisions of this Declaration shall be unlawful, void, or voidable for violation of the rule against perpetuities, then such provisions shall continue only until twenty -one (21) years after the death of the last survivor of the now - living descendants of the individuals signing this Declaration. 12.10 Indemnification. To the fullest extent allowed by applicable Washington law, the Association shall indemnify every officer and director against any and all expenses, including, without limitation, attorneys' fees, imposed upon or reasonably incurred by any officer or director in connection with any action, suit, or other proceeding (including settlement of any suit or proceeding, if approved by the then Board of Directors) to which such officer or director may be a party by reason of being or having been an officer or director. The officers and directors shall not be liable for any mistake of judgment, negligent or otherwise, except for their own individual willful misfeasance, malfeasance, misconduct, or bad faith. The officers and directors shall have no personal liability with respect to any contract or other commitment made by them, in good faith, on behalf of the Association (except to the extent that such officers or directors may also be members of the Association), and the Association shall indemnify and forever hold each such officer and director free and harmless against any and all liability to others on account of any such contract or commitment. Any right to indemnification provided for herein shall not be exclusive of any other rights to which any officer or director, or former officer or director, may be entitled. The Association may, at the discretion of the Board, maintain adequate general liability and officers' and directors' liability insurance to fund this obligation, if such coverage is reasonably available. 12.11 Books and Records. This Declaration, the Bylaws, copies of rules and use restrictions, membership register, books of account, and minutes of meetings of the members of the Board and of committees shall be made available pursuant to reasonable procedures established by the Board for inspection and copying by any member of the Association or by the duly appointed representative of any member and by holders, insurers, or guarantors of any first Mortgage at any reasonable time and for a purpose reasonably related to such Person's interest as a member or holder, insurer, or guarantor of a first Mortgage at - 32 - the office of the Association or at such other reasonable place as the Board shall prescribe. 12.12 Financial Review. A review of the books and records of the Association shall be made annually in the manner as the Board of Directors may decide; provided, however, after having received the Board's financial statements at the annual meeting, by a majority of the Total Association Vote, the Owners may require that the accounts of the Association be audited as a common expense by a certified public accountant. Upon written request of any institutional holder of a first Mortgage and upon payment of all necessary costs, such holder shall be entitled to receive a copy of audited financial statements within ninety (90) days of the date of the request. 12.13 Notice of Sale, Lease or Acquisition. In the event an Owner sells or leases such Owner's Lot, the Owner shall give to the Association, in writing, prior to the effective date of such sale or lease, the name of the purchaser or lessee of the Lot and such other information as the Board may reasonably require. Upon acquisition of a Lot each new Owner shall give the Association, in writing, the name and mailing address of the Owner and such other information as the Board may reasonably require. 12.14 Agreements. Subject to the prior approval of Declarant (so long as Declarant owns any property for development and /or sale in the Community or has the right to unilaterally annex additional property to the Community) all agreements and determinations, including settlement agreements regarding litigation involving the Association, lawfully authorized by the Board of Directors shall be binding upon all Owners, their heirs, legal representatives, successors, assigns, and others having an interest in the Community or the privilege of possession and enjoyment of any part of the Community. 12.15 Implied Rights. The Association may exercise any right or privilege given to it expressly by this Declaration, the Bylaws, the Articles of Incorporation, any use restriction or rule, and every other right or privilege reasonably to be implied from the existence of any right or privilege given to it therein or reasonably necessary to effectuate any such right or privilege. 12.16 Variances. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the Board of Directors or its designee shall be authorized to grant individual variances from any of the provisions of this Declaration, the Bylaws and any rule, regulation or use restriction established pursuant thereto if it determines that waiver of application or enforcement of the - 33 - thevoverallnscheme particular case inconsistent with Community. 12.17 Litigation. No judicial or administrative proceeding shall be commenced or prosecuted by the Association tun approved by at least seventy -five percent (75 %) to Association Vote. This Section shall not apply, however, (i) actions brought by the Association to enforce the provisions of this Declaration (including, without limitation, the foreclosure of liens), (ii) the imposition and collection of assessments as provided in Article 4 hereof, (iii) proceedings involving challenges to ad valorem taxation, or (iv) counter claims brought by the Association in proceedings instituted against it. This Section shall not be amended unless such amendment is made by the Declarant pursuant to Section 12.4, to hereof, or is approved by the percentage votes, and pursuant the same procedures, necessary to institute proceedings as provided above. EXECUTED the day and year first above written. DECLARANT: STANTON - SPOKANE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Washington limited partnership By: Stanton Development Company, a Washington general partnership Its General Partner By: Housley Development Corporation, a Washington corporation Its General Partner By Its By: Dean Building Corporation, a Washington corporation Its General Partner By Its - 34 - STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF On this day of , 1994, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared to me known to be the of Housley Development Corporation, a Washington corporation, and , to me known to be the of Dean Building Corporation, a Washington corporation, the General Partners of Stanton Development Company, a Washington general partnership, the General Partner of STANTON - SPOKANE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Washington limited partnership, the limited partnership that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said limited partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL hereto affixed the day and year first above written. 2 2 2 0 1 2 - 35 - Name NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My commission expires EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SUBMITTED TO THIS DECLARATION THE WEST OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST, W.M.: EXCEPTING COUNTY ROADS ON THE WEST 30 FEET AND SOUTH 20 FEET; AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING 4 TRACTS: (1 OF 4) THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6 LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5, 450 FEET SOUTH OF THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION, 330 FEET; THENCE NORTH 81 °16' EAST, 990.5.FEET; THENCE NORTH 63 °49' EAST, 685.8 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55 °52' EAST, 762.2 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6, SAID POINT BEING 425.3 FEET NORTH OF THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 8; (2 OF 4) THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE NORTH 00 °00'49" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 8, A DISTANCE OF 959.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 °59'11" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION, SAID POINT BEING THE EAST LINE OF [BARER] ROAD; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89 °59'11" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 370.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH [00 %D00'49 "] EAST, A DISTANCE OF 650.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 °59'11" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 370.00 FEET EAST LINE OF [BAKER] ROAD; THENCE SOUTH [00 %D00'49 "] WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID [BARKER] ROAD, A DISTANCE OF 650.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON. EXHIBIT A - 1 (3 OF 4) BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5, 1,809 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE EAST 30 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE EAST 200 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 5,200 FEET; THENCE WEST 200 FEET TO A POINT 30 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH SAID WEST LINE AND 30 FEET EAST THEREOF 200 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON. (4 OF 4) A PORTION OF SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST ONE - QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST; THENCE SOUTH 00 ° 35'03" EAST, ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 8, A DISTANCE OF 450.00 FEET; THENCE PERPENDICULAR TO SAID WEST LINE NORTH 89 ° 24'57" EAST A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF [BARKER] ROAD THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION BY STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 25, 1988 UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 8808250252, THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 89 °24'57" EAST A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 80 °40'57" EAST A DISTANCE OF 434.35 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE, SOUTH 66 °24'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 349.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 34 °24'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 190.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 85 °35'03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF [BARKER] ROAD; THENCE NORTH 00 °35'03" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON. EXHIBIT A - 2 EXHIBIT B ADDITIONAL PROPERTY WHICH MAY BE SUBMITTED TO THIS DECLARATION BY DECLARANT The following real property, less that property described on the foregoing Exhibit A, may be annexed to Riverwalk by the Declarant pursuant to Article 9 of this Declaration: [To be inserted.] ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF RIVERWALR OWNERS ASSOCIATION ARTICLE 1. NAME ARTICLE 2. DURATION STANTON - SPOKANE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Washington limited partnership, for the purpose of forming a nonprofit corporation under Chapter 24.03 of the Revised Code of Washington, adopts the following Articles of Incorporation: The name of the corporation is Riverwalk Owners Association. The Association shall have perpetual duration. Articles of Incorporation ARTICLE 3. PURPOSES AND POWERS 8• fa•Gz-} 3.1 The Association does not contemplate pecuniary gain or profit, direct or indirect, to its members. In way of explanation and not of limitation, the purposes for which the Association is formed are: 3.1.1 to be and constitute the Association to which reference is made in the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Riverwalk Owners (hereinafter the "Declaration "), recorded or to be recorded in the Records of Spokane County, Washington, to perform all obligations and duties of the Association, and to exercise all rights and powers of the Association, as specified therein, in the Bylaws of the Association ( "Bylaws ") and as provided by law; and 3.1.2 to provide an entity for the furtherance of the interests of the Owners in the development. 3.2 In furtherance of its purposes, shall have the following powers, which, unless by the Declaration or Bylaws, may be exercised Directors: the Association indicated otherwise by the Board of p.- AUG 3.2.1 all of the powers conferred upon nonprofit corporations by common law and the statutes of the State of Washington in effect from time to time; 3.2.2 all of the powers necessary or desirable to perform the obligations and duties and to exercise the rights and powers set out in these Articles, the Bylaws, or the Declaration, including, without limitation, the following: (i) to fix and to collect assessments or other charges to be levied; (ii) to manage, control, operate, maintain, repair, and improve property subjected to the Declaration or any other property for which the Association by rule, regulation, declaration, or contract has a right or duty to provide such services; (iii) to enforce covenants, conditions, or restrictions affecting any property to the extent the Association may be authorized to do so under the Declaration or Bylaws; (iv) to engage in activities which will actively foster, promote, and advance the common interests of all owners of property subject to the Declaration; (v) to buy or otherwise acquire, sell, or otherwise dispose of, mortgage, or otherwise encumber, exchange, lease, hold, use, operate, and otherwise deal in and with real, personal, and mixed property of all kinds and any right or interest therein for any purpose of the Corporation; (vi) to borrow money for any purpose; (vii) to enter into, make, perform, or enforce contracts of every kind and description, and to do all other acts necessary, appropriate, or advisable in carrying out any purpose of the Association, with or in association with any other association, corporation, or other entity or agency, public or private; (viii) to act as agent, trustee, �r other representative of other corporations, firms, or individuals, and as such to advance the business or ownership interests in such corporations, firms, or individuals; and Articles of Incorporation Page 2 (ix) to adopt, alter, and amend or repeal such Bylaws as may be necessary or desirable for the proper management of the affairs of the Association; provided, however, such Bylaws may not be inconsistent with or contrary to any provisions of the Declaration. 3.3 The foregoing enumeration of powers shall not limit or restrict in any manner the exercise of other and further rights and powers which may now or hereafter be allowed or permitted by law; and the powers specified in each of the paragraphs of this Article 3 are independent powers, not to be restricted by reference to or inference'from the terms of any other paragraph or provisions of this Article 3. ARTICLE 4. MEMBERSHIP The Association shall be a membership corporation without certificates of shares of stock. Each Person who is the record owner of a Lot (as such capitalized terms are defined in the Declaration) subject to the Declaration is a member and shall be entitled to vote as set forth herein and in the Declaration and the Bylaws. ARTICLE 5. BOARD OF DIRECTORS The business and affairs of the Association shall be conducted, managed, and controlled by a Board of Directors. The Board shall initially consist of three (3) directors. The names and addresses of the initial Board of Directors are as follows: P. Edward Dean, Jr. c/o Dean Building Corp. 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, WA 98052 Brian Housley c/o Housley Development Corporation #206 - 1120 Hamilton Street Vancouver, BC V6B 2S2 CANADA Patrick J. Corr c/o Dean Building Corp. 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, WA 98052 Articles of Incorporation Page 3 The number of directors shall be increased to five (5) upon termination of Declarant control of the Association in accordance with the Declaration and Bylaws. The method of election, term of office, removal and filling of vacancies shall be as set forth in the Bylaws. The Board may delegate such operating authority to such companies, individuals, or committees as it, in its discretion, may determine. ARTICLE 6. LIABILITY OF_DIRECTORS To the full extent that the Washington Nonprofit Corporation Act permits the elimination of limitation of liability of directors, a director of the Association shall not be liable to the Association or its members for monetary damages for conduct as a director; provided that the liability of a director shall not be eliminated or limited for acts or omissions that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, for approval of distributions or loans contrary to law, or for any transaction from which the director has personally received or will personally receive a benefit in money, property, or services to which the director is not legally entitled. ARTICLE 7. VA /HUD APPROVAL As long as the Declarant (as such term is defined in the Declaration) has the right to appoint and remove the directors and officers of the Association as provided in the Bylaws, the following actions shall require the prior approval of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs ( "VA "), so long as the Development is approved by the VA for the guaranteeing of mortgages in the Development, and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ( "HUD "), so long as the Development is approved by HUD for the insuring of mortgages in the Development: annexation of additional property to the Development, except for annexation by Declarant in accordance with Section 9.1 of the Declaration; mergers and consolidations; mortgaging of Common Property (as such term is defined in the Declaration); dedication of Common Property to any public entity; dissolution; and amendment of these Articles of Incorporation. Articles of Incorporation Page 4 ARTICLE 8. DISSOLUTION The Association may be dissolved only upon a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors and the affirmative vote of members who are Owners of not less than two - thirds (2/3) of the Lots (other than the Declarant) and the consent of the Declarant so long as the Declarant owns any property subject to the Declaration or which may be unilaterally subjected to the Declaration by the Declarant. Upon dissolution of the Association, so long as the VA is guaranteeing and /or HUD is insuring any mortgage in the Development, and unless otherwise agreed in writing by HUD or VA, as applicable, any remaining real property assets of the Association shall be dedicated to an appropriate public agency to be used for purposes similar to those for which this Association was created. In the event that such dedication is refused acceptance, such assets shall be granted, conveyed and assigned to any nonprofit corporation, association, trust or other organization to be devoted to such similar purposes. No such restriction shall exist if VA is not guaranteeing and HUD is not insuring any mortgage in the Development; provided, however, HUD and /or VA shall be notified of such dissolution. ARTICLE 9. MERGER AND CONSOLIDATION The Association may merge or consolidate only upon a resolution duly adopted by the board of directors and the affirmative vote of members who are Owners of not less than two - thirds (2/3) of the total Association Vote and the consent of the Declarant so long as the Declarant owns any property subject to the Declaration or which may be unilaterally subjected to the Declaration by the Declarant. ARTICLE 10. AMENDMENTS These Articles may be amended only upon a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors and the affirmative vote of at least two - thirds (2/3) of the total Association Vote; provided, however, no members shall be entitled to vote on any amendment to these Articles of Incorporation for the sole purpose of complying with the requirements of any governmental (including, without limitation, HUD or VA) or quasi governmental entity or institutional lender authorized to fund, insure or guarantee mortgages on individual Lots, as such requirements may exist from time to time, which amendments may be adopted by the Board of Directors. Articles of Incorporation Page 5 ARTICLE 11. INCORPORATOR The name and address of the sole incorporator is Steven R. Rovig, c/o Hillis Clark Martin & Peterson, P.S., 500 Galland Building, 1221 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101 -2925. ARTICLE 12. REGISTERED AGENT AND OFFICE The initial registered office of the Association shall be located at 500 Galland Building, 1221 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101 -2925, and the initial registered agent at such address is Hillis Clark Martin & Peterson, P.S. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed these Articles of Incorporation this day of , 1994. 1 2 6 7 7 0 STEVEN R. ROVIG Articles of Incorporation Page 6 HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON, P.S. hereby consents to serve as Registered Agent, in the State of Washington, for Riverwalk Owners Association. It is understood that, as agent for the Association, HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON, P.S. will have the responsibility to receive service of process in the name of the Association; to forward all mail, to the Association; and to immediately notify the office of the Secretary of State in the event of its resignation, or of any changes in the registered office address of the. Association for which it is agent. 1 2 6 7 7 0 CONSENT TO SERVE AS REGISTERED AGENT DATED: , 1994. HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON, P.S. By Steven R. Rcvig Its Vice President Address: 500 Gailand Building 1221 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 - 2925 Articles of Incorporation Page 7 • BYLAWS OF RIVERWALR OWNERS ASSOCIATION ARTICLE 1 P� SPOt4 231994 NAME, MEMBERSHIP, APPLICABILITY, AND DEFINITIONS OE 4q Nz 1.1 NAME. The name of the Association shall be Riverwalk Owners Association ( "Association "). 1.2 MEMBERSHIP. The Association shall have one (1) class of membership, as is more fully set forth in that Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Riverwalk Owners as amended from time to time ( "Declaration "), the terms of which pertaining to membership are specifically incorporated by reference herein. 1.3 DEFINITIONS. The words used in these Bylaws shall have the same meaning as set forth in,the Declaration, unless the context shall prohibit. ARTICLE 2 ASSOCIATION: MEETINGS, QUORUM, VOTING, PROXIES 2.1 PLACE OF MEETINGS. Meetings of the Association shall be held at the principal office of the Association or at such other suitable place convenient to the members as may be designated by the Board of Directors, either in the Community or as convenient thereto as possible and practical. 2.2 FIRST MEETING AND ANNUAL MEETINGS. The first annual meeting shall be held within sixty (60) days after termination of the Development Period on a date set by the Board. Thereafter, annual meetings shall be set by the Board so as to occur no later than sixty (60) days after the close of the Association's fiscal year. 2.3 SPECIAL MEETINGS. The President may call special meetings. In addition, it shall be the duty of the President to call a special meeting of the Association if so directed by resolution of the Board of Directors or upon a petition signed by at least twenty -five (25 %) percent of the Total Association Vote (the consent of the Declarant shall not be required). The notice of any special meeting shall state the date, time, and Bylaws Page 1 place of such meeting and the purpose thereof. No business shall be transacted at a special meeting, except as stated in the notice. 2.4 NOTICE OF MEETINGS. It shall be the duty of the Secretary to mail or to cause to be delivered to the Owner of each Lot (as shown in the records of the Association) a notice of each annual or special meeting of the Association stating the time and place where it is to be held and in the notice of a special meeting, the purpose thereof. If an Owner wishes notice to be given at an address other than the Lot, the Owner shall designate by notice in writing to the Secretary such other address. The mailing or delivery of a notice of meeting in the manner provided in this Section shall be considered service of notice. Notices shall be served not less than ten (10) nor more than fifty (50) days before a meeting. 2.5 WAIVER OF NOTICE. Waiver of notice of a meeting of the members shall be deemed the equivalent of proper notice. Any member may, in writing, waive notice of any meeting of the members, either before or after such meeting. Attendance at a meeting by a member, whether in person or by proxy, shall be deemed waiver by such member of notice of the time, date, and place thereof, unless such member specifically objects to lack of proper notice at the time the meeting is called to order. 2.6 ADJOURNMENT OF MEETINGS. If any meetings of the Association cannot be held because a quorum is not present, a majority of the members who are present at such meeting, either in person or by proxy, may adjourn the meeting to a time not less than five (5) nor more than thirty (30) days from the time the original meeting was called. At such adjourned meeting at which a quorum is present, any business which might have been transacted at the meeting originally called may be transacted without further notice. 2.7 VOTING. The voting rights of the members shall be as set forth in the Articles of Incorporation and the Declaration, and such voting rights are specifically incorporated herein. 2.8 PROXIES. At all meetings of members, each member may vote in person or by proxy. All proxies shall be in writing, dated, and filed with the Secretary before the appointed time of each meeting. Every proxy shall be revocable and shall automatically cease upon conveyance by the member of such member's Lot, or upon receipt of notice by the Secretary of the death or judicially declared incompetence of a member, or of written revocation, or upon the expiration of eleven (11) months from the date of the proxy. Bylaws Page 2 2.9 QUORUM. The presence, in person or by proxy, of twenty -five percent (25 %) of the Total Association Vote shall constituts a quorum at all meetings of the Association. The members present at a duly called or held meeting at which a quorum is present may continue to do business until adjournment, notwithstanding the withdrawal of enough members to leave less than a quorum. If the required quorum is not present, another meeting may be called subject to the same notice requirements, and the required quorum at such subsequent meeting shall be ten percent (10 %) of the Total Association Vote. No such subsequent meeting shall be held more than sixty (60) days following the initial meeting. ARTICLE 3 BOARD OF DIRECTORS: NUMBER, POWERS, MEETINGS 3.1 GOVERNING BODY; COMPOSITION. The affairs of the Association shall be governed by a Board of Directors. Except as provided in Section 3.2 of this Article, the directors must reside in the Community and shall be members of the Association; provided, however, no Person and his or her spouse may serve on the Board at the same time. 3.2 DIRECTORS APPOINTED BY DECLARANT. Declarant shall have the right to appoint or remove any member or members of the Board of Directors or any officer or officers of the Association until termination of the Development Period. Each Owner, by acceptance of a deed to or other conveyance of a Lot, vests in Declarant such authority to appoint and remove directors and officers of the Association. The directors selected by the Declarant need not be Owners or residents in the Community. 3.3 NUMBER OF DIRECTORS. The Board shall initially consist of three (3) members; provided, however, that the Declarant may increase the number of Directors to five (5), which shall be the number of directors elected by the owners pursuant to Section 3.5 below. 3.4 NOMINATION OF DIRECTORS. Elected directors shall be nominated from the floor and may also be nominated by a nominating committee, if such a committee is established by the Board. All candidates shall have a reasonable opportunity to communicate their qualifications to the members and to solicit votes. 3.5 ELECTION AND TERM OF OFFICE. Owner- elected directors shall be elected and hold office as follows: Bylaws Page 3 (a) After the Declarant's right to appoint directors and officers terminates, the Association shall call a special meeting to be held at which Owners shall elect five (5) directors. (b) At annual meetings of the membership there- after, directors shall be elected. All eligible members of the Association shall vote on all directors to be elected, and the candidate(s) receiving the votes shall be elected. Initially, the term of two (2) directors shall be fixed at one. (1) year, the term of two (2) directors shall be fixed at two (2) years,and the term of one (1) director shall be fixed at three (3) years and each candidate shall declare for which seat he or she is running. At the expiration of the initial term of office of each respective Owner - elected member of the Board of Directors, a successor shall be elected to serve for a term of three (3) years. The members of the Board of Directors shall hold office until their respective successors shall have been elected by the Association. 3.6 REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS. At any regular or special meeting of the Association duly called, any one (1) or more of the members of the Board of Directors may be removed, with or without cause, by a majority of the Total Association Vote and a successor may then and there be elected to fill the vacancy thus created. A director whose removal has been proposed by the Owners shall be given at least ten (10) day's notice of the calling of the meeting and the purpose thereof and shall be given an opportunity to be heard at the meeting. Additionally, any director who has three (3) consecutive unexcused absences from Board meetings or who is delinquent in the payment of an assessment for more than thirty (30) days may be removed by a majority vote of the remaining directors at a meeting. This Section shall not apply to directors appointed by Declarant. 3.7 VACANCIES. Vacancies in the Board of Directors caused by any reason, excluding the removal of a director by vote of the Association, shall be filled by a vote of the majority of the remaining directors, even though less than a quorum, at any meeting of the Board of Directors. Each Person so selected shall serve the unexpired portion of the term.. Bylaws Page 4 3.8 ORGANIZATION MEETINGS. The first meeting of the Board of Directors following each annual meeting of the membership shall provide for the election of officers and shall be held within ten (10) days thereafter at such time and place as shall be fixed by the Board. 3.9 REGULAR MEETINGS. Regular meetings of the Board of Directors may be held at such time and place as shall be determined from time to time by a majority of the directors, but at least four (4) such meetings shall be held during each fiscal year with at least one (1) per quarter. Notice of the regular schedule shall constitute sufficient notice of such meetings. So long as the Declarant has the right to appoint the Directors of the Association, only one annual meeting of the Directors shall be required. 3.10 SPECIAL MEETINGS. Special meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held when requested by the President, Vice President or by any two (2) directors. The notice shall specify the time and place of the meeting and the nature of any special business to be considered. The notice shall be given to each director by one of the following methods: (a) by personal delivery; (b) written notice by first -class mail, postage prepaid; (c) by telephone communication, either directly to the director or to a Person at the director's home or office who would reasonably be expected to communicate such notice promptly to the director; (d) by facsimile to the director's home or office; or (e) by commercial delivery service to the director's home or office. All such notices shall be given or sent to the director's address or telephone number as shown on the records of the Association. Notices sent by first -class mail shall be deposited into a United States mailbox at least four (4) days before the time set for the meeting. Notices given by personal delivery, telephone, or facsimile shall be given at least forty -eight (48) hours before the time set for the meeting. 3.11 WAIVER OF NOTICE. The transactions of any meeting of the Board of Directors, however called and noticed or wherever held, shall be as valid as though taken at a meeting duly held after regular call and notice, if (a) a quorum is present, and (b) either before or after the meeting, each of the directors not present signs a written waiver of notice, a consent to holding the meeting, or an approval of the minutes. The waiver of notice or consent need not specify the purpose of the meeting: Notice of a meeting shall also be deemed given to any director who attends the meeting without protesting before or at its commencement about the lack of adequate notice. 3.12 QUORUM OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS. At all meetings of the Board of Directors, a majority of the directors shall Bylaws Page 5 constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, and the votes of a majority of the directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present shall constitute the decision of the Board of Directors. 3.13 COMPENSATION. No director shall receive any compensation from the Association for acting as such. 3.14 OPEN MEETINGS. All meetings of the Board shall be open to all members, but members other than directors may not participate in any discussion or deliberation unless expressly so authorized by the Board. So long as the Declarant has the right to appoint the Directors of the Association, meetings of the Board shall not be open to the members unless the Board chooses to do so. 3.15 EXECUTIVE SESSION. The Board may adjourn a meeting and reconvene in executive session to discuss and vote upon personnel matters, litigation in which the Association is or may become involved, and orders of business of a similar nature. The nature of any and all business to be considered in executive session shall first be announced in open session. 3.16 ACTION WITHOUT A FORMAL MEETING. Any action to be taken at a meeting of the directors or any action that may be taken at a meeting of the directors may be taken without a meeting if a consent in writing, setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by all of the directors. 3.17 TELEPHONIC PARTICIPATION. One (1) or more directors may participate in and vote during any regular or special meeting of the Board by telephone conference call or similar communication equipment by means of which all Persons participating in the meeting can hear each other at the same time, and those directors so participating shall be present at such meeting. Any such meeting at which a quorum participates shall constitute a meeting of the Board. 3.18 POWERS. The Board of Directors shall be responsible for the affairs of the Association and shall have all of the powers and duties necessary for the administration of the Association's affairs and, as provided by law, may do all . acts and things as are not by the Declaration, Articles, or these Bylaws directed to be done and exercised exclusively by the members. In addition to the duties imposed by these Bylaws or by any resolution of the Association that may hereafter be adopted, the Board of Directors shall have the power to and shall be responsible for the following, in way of explanation, but not limitation: Bylaws Page 6 (a) preparation and adoption of an annual budget in which there shall be established the contribution of each Owner to the common expenses; (b) making assessments to defray the common expenses, establishing the means and methods of collecting such assessments; (c) providing for the operation, care, upkeep, and maintenance of all areas which.are the maintenance responsibility of the Association; (d) designating, hiring, and dismissing the personnel necessary for the operation of the Association and, where appropriate, providing for the compensation of such personnel and for the purchase of equipment, supplies, and material to be used by such personnel in the performance of their duties; (e) collecting the assessments, depositing the proceeds thereof in a bank depository which it shall approve, and using the proceeds to administer the Association; (f) making and amending use restrictions and rules and regulations; (g) opening of bank accounts on behalf of the Association and designating the signatories required; (h) enforcing by legal means the provisions of the Declaration, these Bylaws, and the rules and regulations adopted by it, and bring any proceedings which may be instituted on behalf of or against the Owners concerning the Association; (i) obtaining and carrying insurance against casualties and liabilities, as provided in the Declaration, and paying the premium cost thereof; (j) paying the cost of all services rendered to the Association or its members which are not directly chargeable to Owners; (k) keeping books with detailed accounts of the receipts and expenditures affecting the Association and its administration, and specifying the maintenance and repair expenses and any other expenses incurred; and (1) contracting with any Person for the performance of various duties and functions. Bylaws Page 7 3.19 MANAGEMENT AGENT. The Board of Directors may employ for the Association a professional management agent or agents at a compensation established by the Board of Directors to perform such duties and services as the Board of Directors shall authorize. The Declarant or an affiliate of the Declarant may be employed as managing agent or Manager. The term of any management agreement shall not exceed one (1) year and shall be subject to termination by either party, without cause and without penalty, upon ninety (90) days' written.notice. 3.20 BORROWING. The Board of Directors shall have the power to borrow money without the approval of the members of the Association; provided, however, the Board shall obtain membership approval in the same manner as for special assessments, in the event that the proposed borrowing is for the purpose of modifying, improving, or adding amenities, or the total amount . of such borrowing exceeds or would exceed Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00). ARTICLE 4 OFFICERS 4.1 OFFICERS. The officers of the Association shall be a President, Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer. Any two (2) or more offices may be held by the same Person, excepting the offices of President and Secretary. The President and Treasurer shall be elected from among the members of the Board of Directors. 4.2 ELECTION, TERM OF OFFICE, AND VACANCIES. Except during the period in which the Declarant has the right to appoint the officers of the Association under Article 3, Section 3.2 of these Bylaws, the officers of the Association shall be elected annually by the Board of Directors at the first meeting of the Board of Directors following each annual meeting of the members. A vacancy in any office arising because of death, resignation, removal, or otherwise may be filled by the Board of Directors for the unexpired portion of the term. 4.3 REMOVAL. Any officer may be removed by the Board of Directors whenever, in their judgment, the best interests of the Association will be served thereby. 4.4 PRESIDENT. The President shall be the chief executive officer of the Association and shall preside at all meetings of the Association and of the Board of Directors. The President shall have all the general powers and duties which are Bylaws Page 8 incident to the office of the president of a corporation organized under the Washington Nonprofit Corporation Act. 4.5 VICE PRESIDENT. The Vice President shall act in the President's absence and shall have all powers, duties, and responsibilities provided for the President when so acting. 4.6 SECRETARY. The Secretary shall keep the minutes of all meetings of the Association and of the Board of Directors and shall have charge of such books and papers as the Board of Directors may direct and shall, in general, perform all duties incident to the office of the secretary of a corporation organized in accordance with Washington law. 4.7 TREASURER. The Treasurer shall have the - responsibility for the Association's funds and securities and shall be responsible for keeping full and accurate financial records and books of account showing all receipts and disbursements, for preparing all required financial statements and tax returns, and for the deposit of all monies and other valuable effects in the name of the Association or the managing agent in such depositories as may from time to time be designated by the Board of Directors. 4.8 RESIGNATION. Any officer may resign at any time by giving written notice to the Board of Directors. Such resignation shall take effect on the date of the receipt of such notice or at any later time specified therein, and unless otherwise specified therein, the acceptance of such resignation shall not be necessary to make it effective. ARTICLE 5 COMMITTEES Committees to perform such tasks and to serve for such periods as may be designated by the Board are hereby authorized. Each committee shall be composed and shall operate in accordance with the terms of the resolution of the Board of Directors designating the committee or with rules adopted by the Board of Directors. Bylaws Page 9 ARTICLE 6 MISCELLANEOUS 6.1 FISCAL YEAR. The fiscal year of the Association shall be the calendar year unless otherwise determined by resolution of the Board. 6.2 PARLIAMENTARY RULES. Roberts Rules of Order (current edition) shall govern the conduct of all Association proceedings, when not in conflict with Washington law, the Articles of Incorporation, the Declaration, these Bylaws, or a ruling made by the Person presiding over the proceeding. 6.3 CONFLICTS. If there are conflicts or inconsistencies between the provisions of Washington law, the Articles of Incorporation, the Declaration, and these Bylaws, the provisions of Washington law, the Declaration, the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws (in that order) shall prevail. 6.4 AMENDMENT. These Bylaws may be amended by the Board of Directors (a) if such amendment is necessary to bring any provision hereof into compliance with any applicable governmental statute, rule, or regulation or judicial determination which shall be in conflict therewith; (b) if such amendment is necessary to enable any title insurance company to issue title insurance coverage with respect to the Lots subject to the Declaration; (c) if such amendment is required by an institutional or governmental lender or purchaser or mortgage loans, including, for example, the Federal National Mortgage Association or Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, to enable such lender or purchaser to make or purchase Mortgage loans on the Lots subject to the Declaration; or (d) if such amendment is necessary to enable any governmental agency or private insurance company to insure or guarantee Mortgage loans on the Lots subject to the Declaration. In addition, these Bylaws may be amended upon the affirmative vote or written consent, or any combination thereof, of at least two - thirds (2/3) of the Total Association Vote; provided, however, that the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (if it is then guaranteeing Mortgages in the Community or has issued a project approval for the guaranteeing of such mortgages) and /or the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (if it is then insuring any Mortgage in the Community or has issued a project approval for the insuring of such mortgages) shall have the right to veto amendments to these Bylaws for as long as the Declarant has the right to appoint and remove the directors and officers of the Association. Bylaws Page 10 CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION The undersigned, Patrick J. Corr, being the Secretary of RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION hereby certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Bylaws adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors of the Association dated March 25, 1994. 1 2 6 7 7 2 RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION By Patrick J. Corr Its Secretary Bylaws Page 11 pCLrY . -_ AUG 2 31994 SPOKANE COUNTY, PLANNING DEPARTMBI{'p RIVERWALR OWNERS ASSOCIATION CONSENT IN LIEU OF ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS Pursuant to the Washington Nonprofit Corporation Act, the undersigned, being all of the directors named in the Articles of Incorporation of Riverwalk Owners Association, a Washington nonprofit corporation (the "Association "), by this instrument in lieu of an organizational meeting of the Board of Directors of the Association, consent to the adoption of the following resolutions: RESOLVED, that the Bylaws in the form attached to this Consent as Exhibit A, are approved and adopted as the Bylaws of the Association, and the Secretary is directed to file such Bylaws in the minute book of the Association; and RESOLVED FURTHER, that the proposed 1994 Association Budget, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, is authorized and approved; and RESOLVED FURTHER, are elected to serve until directors and until their elected and qualified or removed: and that the following officers the first annual meeting of respective successors are until they resign or are President Brian Housley Vice President . . . P. Edward Dean, Jr. Secretary /Treasurer . Patrick J. Corr RESOLVED FURTHER, that the officers of the Association are authorized to establish, close, and re- establish such banking accounts and other banking relationships as they deem advisable, at any time and from time to time, at such institutions as they select, in their sole discretion; and RESOLVED FURTHER, that the officers of the Association are authorized to execute, in the name of and on behalf of the Association, any form of authorization of corporate signatures or signature card required by any such institution in order to establish such accounts and any resolutions set forth in any such form, when so executed, shall be deemed to Board of Directors Consent Page 1 Riverwalk Owners Association L EXHIBITS: 1 2 6 7 7 3 have been adopted by the Board of Directors of the Association; and RESOLVED FURTHER, that Association is directed to file executed form in the corporate Association; and the Secretary of the a copy of each such minute book of the RESOLVED FURTHER, that the officers of the Association are authorized and directed to make applica- tion for and obtain all licenses, permits, and authorizations required under any, laws or regulations affecting the operations of the Association, and to take all steps necessary for the Association to comply with municipal, state, and federal tax laws and applicable state and federal workmen's compensation and industrial insurance laws; and RESOLVED FURTHER, that the officers of the Association are directed to file all reports and returns required by the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Washington. P. Edward Dean, Jr. Brian Housley Patrick J. Corr A - BYLAWS B - 1994 BUDGET EXECUTED as of the Board of Directors Consent Riverwalk Owners Association day of , 1994. Page 2 Gentlemen: DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer January 15, 1997 Todd Whipple, P.E. Inland Pacific Engineering 707 West 7th Avenue Spokane. WA 99204 Very truly yours, SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Plan Change Approval - Mission /Harmony • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E.. Director We are enclosing a copy of the approved plan change for this location. In order to begin construction, the original mylar set of the current plans on file at the County Engineer's Office will need to be revised and re- approved, so that the construction plans may be re- issued. Please note that a permit will be required for that portion of the work to be accomplished or conducted within the County right of way. Please call Ed Parry to coordinate the method of the plan revisions, as well as to coordinate when the plans will be updated. The following methods will be acceptable: Pen - and -ink revisions; Re -issue of the affected plan sheets; A supplemental plan sheet added to the current plan set; A combination of the above, or another mutually agreeable method. Any questions regarding plan revisions should be addressed to Ed Parry. Sylvia Lightfoot will be able to assist with questions related to permit requirements. They may be reached at 456 -3600. Thank you. William A. Johns, P. E. Spokane County Engineer Edwar J. rry, Jr., P.E. Plan Review Engineer coiAoject file revieWe 5 r 1fL'�6 W. B • A ;• e. Spokane, WA 992E9 - 0)70 • ( 56 q :360 Re q X: 50) gig WA 7DD: (509) 324 - 3166 Mart; Hancock, Dealt f ousely Cl 11 Company, 16 / N F DATE NOVEMBER 8, 1996 ROAD NAME MISSION AVENUE CRP/RID # N/A NAME OF PLAT RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION Plat if PE- 1414 -81/95 ADDRESS OF BLDG N/A NAME OF BLDG PROJECT N/A BLDG# B9 N/A S 8 T 25N R45R 1 FEDERALJSTATE PROJECT if N/A PROJECT LIMITS EXISTING CONDITIONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: ROAD WIDTH 24'± r 40 ROAD SURFACE ACP ACP AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC 2400 ADT 3120 ADT Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count PROJECT DESCRIPTION SEE ATTACHED LETTER PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION SEE ATTACHED LETTER JUSTIFICATION: REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION 530.00 SEE ATTACHED LETTER SUBMITTED BY TODD WHIPPLE, P.E., INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. DATE NOVEMBER 8. 1996 ADDRESS 707 WEST 7TH AVENUE, SUITE 200, SPOKANE, WA ZIP CODE 99204 PHONE if 509) 458 -6840 ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF $30.00 PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY * * * * * ** 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260 -0170 PHONE (509)456 -3600 FAX (509)324 -3478 (, l / - REQUEST WILL NOT BE REVIEWID 0 FUNDS - t \Mrsig CASH /CHECK / I •,t U ( � � R C / / /� �� . � _,% # RECEIVED BY 11 � DATE e -a S - i2 ^ an& OortS 'L" -DrnC • Approved Approved w /conditions () ( • ji&,rn nil,t rS tral po p ed Approved w /conditions Not Approved ( ) ( ) Approved Approved w /conditions ) ( ) SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S DETERMINATION: Approved w /no conditions () Approved as recommended above Not Approved () Not Approved ( ) DESIGN DEVIATION 5T4FF RRCOMMFN'DATIONS R€cpvrt M i' o MC. -- 014 - Cookitt 4 Izfrr A !term - IS 6 &74A/03 Not Approved ( ) /� c ! Project Manager Date Project Management Engineer Date /[/ / N� Operations Engineer i /Dly / ' t Date Spokane County Engineer Date (BUILDING SETBACK) (SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE UTILITY ESMT.) (OLD RIGHT OF WAY) N EXIST ./S /SIDEW 3,, r ' a (SOUTH SIDE OF EXIST. HOUSE) t' . (FACE OF CURB (TO FENCE) (NEW RIGHT OF WAY) MISSION AVENUE 5 14' 1 NSTALL WHEELCHAIR RAMP RIVERWALK 7TH ADDITION 1 RECEIVED JAN p21997 spOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SCALE: 1" =20' C LOT 13, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION DATE: 11 14 96 707 West 7th • Suite Spokane, WA 99204 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 200 (509) 458 -6940 rm. (509) 458 -6844 55' 12' 12' TRAFFIC 20' 30' EXIST. PAVEMENT EXIST. R/W 12' 4' TRAFFIC .0200 FT /FT MIN 5" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. BIKE LAN E PROP. R/W (NOT TO SCALE) EXIST. 4" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 6" MISSION AVENUE COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. 25' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE AND SLOPE EASEMENT 10' FUTURE ACQUISITION TYPE "B" CURB 15' '208' TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION 6' SIDEWAL 2% MIN iv. wH ♦ I•rr_ lth .i1 ale` MODIFIED MISSION AVENUE CROSS SECTION STA. 14 +98.96 TO STA. 15 +90.08 LT. RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION RECEIVED DEC 24 X961 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGtNEE I INLAND "IC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -684.4 12' TRAFFIC 30' 12' TRAFFIC RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION 40' 4' J TRAFFIC .0200 FT Fr MIN EXIST. E.O.P. R/W 2 14' EXIST. 55' 5" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. C rMODIFIED MISSION AVENUE CROSS SECTION STA. 14 +98.96 TO STA. 15 +90.08 LT. (FORMER 10' FUTURE A QUISIT10N) (NOT TO SCALE EXIST. 4" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 6" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. PROP. R/W 15' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE AND SLOPE EASEMENT 8' '208' TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE 3•. TYPE "B" CURB MISSION AVENUE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER f 6' SIDEWALK 2% MIN TYPICAL CROSS -SECTI EXPiRr 9/24 I IlmeM INLAND miC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 7 07 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 Drenm By. E.J. P, 0131C oa 94 SCALE HORIZONTAL: NONE OFTICE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER w. 1028 BROADWAY AVE saoxANE — D -DIED /J AppRO VED: t �..� .`.✓ MISSION AVENUE EAST OF BARKER ROAD TYPICA` ROADWAY SECTION SHEET 1 O f Designed By E.J.P. 08/94 COUNTY ENGINEER 001e: rl chocked at , <R/ AL: NONE MISSJON AVENUE (5 YN.) 12' TRAFF.T; 3Q' 12' _ 4' TRAcr^ a^iT LANE H /YT R/W ACP CL. "A" 4" (min.) ACP Ct. 'V 0T*. ACP OCP'N Lc PEA R- VA.IJE TZSTR' C FUTURE aux 10' ACCUISrnON 'MOTH AS REQU+RF0 _ IA% w- DRAINAGE AND ALK Mox EASEMENT hs KfIDtD TYPE ' 9 CIA19 208 TREAT1gENT AND S?OM STORAGE 6 ' J2 ' SIDEWALK I 2% AV L-- T/C + 0.2' \ d' MINlAVIA WATER DEPTH FOR 2C8 \I0.9' MINIIJAN DEPTH f0A SfORA1 VOLUME ,MAXMJ.M WATER SURFACE EtEVAf1C4 DOES NOT ENCROACH CH FUTURE ACOttSIT104 AREA RECEIVED DEC 24 ES Free ayat SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER XSECOO45.0WO TO: 7o// e96 ATTENTION: Ed /y ,71-- P Description No. Copies Purpose 1l Information [T Written Approval Remarks cc: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -6844 Xerox Prints FT Original Drawing Work Authorization 11 4 7eJ Copy of Letter Contract Documents Report 1 1 Description f'e61-7 i'/ Review & Comments I Signature & Return DATE: I.P.E. PROJECT #: is - 3/ - 9r, PROJECT NAME: "6° / LOT /2, g L i1 er Your Request Signed - D 11114SMT PMS December 24, 1996 IPE W.O. #96106 Spokane County Public Works Department Development Engineering Services 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 Attn: Ed Parry, Jr., P.E. Dear Ed: ire INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. /0 /y o add f RE: Riverwalk 1st Addition (P1414 -A) Request for Design Deviation for the sidewalk location and Mission Avenue cross - section Enclosed please find the following in reference to the Design Deviation for the sidewalk location on Lot 13, Block 1 of Riverwalk 1st Addition: 1.) A cross section for Mission Avenue as provided to us from your office for the approved cross section, for your easy reference. 2.) A cross section of Mission Avenue, modified for the area between the west plat boundary and the east curb return station on Mission, stamped and signed by the engineer, Todd Whipple. (See attached exhibit.) 3.) A cross section of Mission Avenue with an 8' cross section for `208' treatment and snow storage, which will be the case when a third lane is added to Mission Avenue. This exhibit is also stamped and signed by the engineer. (See attached exhibit.) We are requesting your approval of the Design Deviation. Your prompt attention to this submittal would be greatly appreciated. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Inla d Pacif n ineering Co pany Todd R. Wh pile, P.E TRW /skm cc: file Document1961061rub3 RFCFIVED DEC 2 4 1996 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER December 13, 1996 IPE W.O. #96106 Spokane County Public Works Department Development Engineering Services 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 Attn: Ed Parry, Jr., P.E. Dear Ed: We have provided with this letter: D„cw. mI %ia 1subl 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509 - 458 -6840 • FAX: 509 - 458 -6844 ire INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Pal, '2- •I 17I1 RECE (JEC 1 9 h; ,;6 RE: Riverwalk 1st Addition (P1414-A) Revised sidewalk location and Mission Avenue cross - section cowry ENt„LcR Information for Evaluation of the Design Devation data In response to your fax of December 2nd to our office, please find enclosed a revised plan for the sidewalk location on Lot 13, Block 1 of Riverwalk 1st Addition. Please note that the west curb ramp has been realigned directly opposite the east curb ramp as you had requested. 1.) A cross section for Mission Avenue as provided to us from your office for the approved cross section, for your easy reference. 2.) A cross section of Mission Avenue, modified for the area between the west plat boundary and the east curb return station on Mission. The approved cross section called out in the Conditions of Approval does not specify the width of the `208' treatment area, though the sidelopes and minimum depth require at least 8.9' to the face of the sidewalk, including the .2' elevation above the top of curb elevation. The cross section has an 18' wide section for `208' treatment and snow storage, if the 10' future acquisition area is utilized. (See attached exhibit.) 3.) A cross section of Mission Avenue with an 8' cross section for `208' treatment and snow storage, which will be the case when a third lane is added to Mission Avenue. (See attached exhibit.) Because there is no curb inlet along the existing curbline, we do not anticipate that there will PrrFIVED OFC 1 3 1996 2020 Lakewood Drive • Su i 205 Coeur d'Alene. ID 8381 208 -765 -7784 • FAX: 208-7 79POICANE ENGINEER „\\c"” Spokane County December 13, 1996 Page 2 be any `208' treatment in this cross section. Therefore, the need for storage, treatment and disposal at this time can be negated. The finished ground profile slopes from east to west, and at the time the commercial property is developed to the west of the Riverwalk lst plat and Mission Avenue is extended, drainage for this area will need to be addressed. The basin map and drainage report in our files from North Idaho Engineering do not indicate any drainage improvements along this section of Mission Avenue. We respectfully remind you that the Riverwalk 1st plans were not designed by this firm, nor constructed under our supervision, and our recourse in helping Dean - Housley get this Design Deviation approved is limited to providing information to you of the existing as -built conditions. Your understanding in this regard is greatly appreciated. ' `� We are requesting your review of the enclosed mac. Your prompt attention to this submittal would be greatly appreciated. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Inlaid Pacific gineering Company Todd R. Whipple, P.E TRW /skm cc: file Enc. D cgmt, %96106urer • November 8, 1996 W.O. No. 96106 Spokane County Public Works W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Attn: Ed Parry, P.E. Dear Ed: I n INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Re: Riverwalk 1st Addition Mission Avenue, Post Construction Design Deviation It is my understanding that you have had several conversations with Mark Hancock regarding the right -of -way and easement situation on Mission Avenue between Stations 15 +00 and 16 +00 along Lot 13, Block 1 at Riverwalk 1st Addition (RW1). Mark Hancock, with the Dean Housley Company, has indicated to me that he has discussed with both you and Dave Berto that the recorded plat is actually missing 10 -feet of slope, sidewalk and drainage easement area from that shown on the approved plans and referenced in the recorded plat. We believe that this has resulted from a misunderstanding of the difference between the easement and it's relationship to the future acquisition area. It appears that the 25 -foot slope, drainage, sidewalk and utility easement has included the 10 -foot future acquisition area within it. Based upon our review and our work on Riverwalk 7th addition it is apparent that these two should have remained separate and distinct. THEREFORE, THIS DESIGN DEVIATION PROPOSES A REVISION TO THE MISSION AVENUE APPROVED CROSS SECTION TO ONLY ALLOW A 15 -FOOT SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ADJACENT TO THE 10 -FOOT FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA. THIS WOULD DEVIATE FROM THE APPROVED 25 -FOOT EASEMENT CALLED OUT ON THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPOKANE COUNTY SPECIAL SECTION. Included with this submittal are the following 1. A copy from the recorded plat map showing the existing 20 - foot ROW, the new dedicated 10 -feet of ROW, a 10 -foot future acquisition area and a 25 -foot sidewalk. slope, drainage and utility easement. Please note that on the plat this 25 foot easement is shown inaccurately as the 10 foot future acquisition area has been made part of this 25 foot easement rather than keeping them separate. This is where the discrepancy has occurred. 2. A copy of the Approved plan sheet of Mission Avenue within this area. 3. A copy of the Approved plan sheet of the special Mission Avenue section. 4. An exhibit showing how the house and fence were actually constructed on lot 13 block 1 of RWl . 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene. ID 83814 Spokane County November 8, 1996 Page 2 We would like for you to note, that IPEC was not the design engineer or the surveyor of record on either the plat or the approved plan set. The engineer and surveyor of record was North Idaho Engineering. We are only providing this design deviation as a service to the Dean Housley Co. Secondly, the house on Lot 13, is now sold and occupied so that there is no longer an option to revise the plat without making this lot unusable as the house would be within the 25 -foot easement. Lastly, a site visit has revealed that the sidewalk was constructed at the back of curb and will be removed and placed as far onto the lot as possible to be outside of the future acquisition area. Please see enclosed lot exhibit for proposed location. As usual your prompt attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated. Should you have any questions regarding this issue please feel free to call at 458 -6840. Sincerely, Inland Pacific dd R. Vhipple, I'.E. TRW /tw ineering Co., I cc: Dean - Housley, Mark Hancock file PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION JUSTIFICATION: PHONE # 15091 458-6840 REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION $30.00 SEE ATTACHED LETTER SEE ATTACHED LETTER NOVEMBER 8, 1996 DATE ROAD NAME MISSION AVENUE CRP /RID # NAME OF PLAT RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION ADDRESS OF BLDG N/A NAME OF BLDG PROJECT N/A BLDG# B9 N/A S T 25N 8451 FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT # N/A PROJECT LIMITS N/A Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count PROJECT DESCRIPTION SEE ATTACHED LETTER Plat // PE- 1414 -81/95 EXISTING CONDITIONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: ROAD WIDTH 24 ' ± 40 ' ± ROAD SURFACE ACP ACP AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC 2400 ADT 3120 ADT SUBMITTED BY TODD WHIPPLE, P.E., INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. DATE NOVEMBER 8, 1996 ADDRESS 707 WEST 7TH AVENUE, SUITE 200, SPOKANE, WA ZIP CODE 99204 * * * * * ** ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF 530.00 PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY * * * * * ** 1026 W BROADWAY. SPOKANE WA 99260 -0170 PHONE (509)456 -3600 FAX (509)324 -3478 - REQUEST WILL NOT BE REVIEWED WITHOUT FUNDS- CASH/CHECK # RECEIVED 13Y DATE ka(tdeiiin.dty 2/96 . NO. YOUR INVOICE NO. INVOICE DATE INVOICE AMOUNT AMOUNT PAID DISCOUNT TAKEN NET CHECK AMOUNT oo b „,... G a 4/ , a.74o,,_ ( u c Dle/Axe/4_ e ,, G N_ 71/0 �� Q� �U INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. r THE IDER OF INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. 707 W. 7TH AVE.. SUITE 200 SPOKANE. WA 99204 (509) 458.6840 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS THIRTY AND NO DATE SECURITY FEATURES INCLUDE' U 01 TAILS ON BACK .. WASHINGTON TRUST BANK SPOKANE, WA 09210 -7127 28-8/1251 0582701 II'0 L86 Lo ': L 25 L000E91: L009764 L1,3o CONTROL NO. AMOUNT 11 -8 -96 $30A0 DOLLARS INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. GENERAL ACCOUNT 11861 ;TA W Q I 7 . FOUND 1 /,' REBAA v/ PLASTIC CAP R1 S 122111 N89'56'50'v N89'56'50'V UNPLATTED NOT A PART 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) 25' SIDEvALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE — AND UTILITY EASEMENT EASEMENT FOk CLEAR VlEv TRIANGLE - SEE DETAIL 'B' 10' F I,TJRE ACQUISITION AREA —moo - FD. SPOKANE COUN"I Y BRASS CAN AS PER SPUKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #245' RP'S PER CIlUNT1' RECORD 552.80' J 627.62' s Ln i 103.63' Q 7 o- 6,736 SF' N89'54'16•vi 103.63' vi 6,736 SF S89'54'16'El • m 103.63' u'1 FIA 9 al 6.736 SF '4 , N89'5 °°_,„ 103.63' a Lri sr 0 N 0 0,/..10 Sr S89'54'16'E" • 6,7 SF 11t�3,�3' 1 S89 54'16'EI T ll °1 vi 6,736 SF .o 10363 S89' 4'16" J 1 . 12 J1 6,736 SF "1 '' 13 9,391 SF _J 25' 9.5. w cu 0 0 0 �o CU o z 25' MISSION AVENUE 70.00' ') 25' ° in q'fU n .nr..° 0' 1 6,737 SF' 0 x2 1 SF I , 89'59'58'? L23 -,a L7 J N 100.00' — IN89'59'58'? i - W 6,431 SF ?NJ Min?' 4 e LLa';S.. L2 g AUGUSTA LANE tin u ii ) N If) L8 0 U") S 89'56'44' E 2615.78' (RL1) N 89'56'50' V 2615.78' (M) \-- DRAINAGE EASEMEN 1988.16' SEE SHEET 4 1 SCALE HCRIZEWiTAL: NONE VERTICAL: NONE MISSION AVENUE (SYII. CAL 12' TRAFTX 30' 12' rRACnc 21S tam CS PER�R -VA;UE rZs7L+IO 4' LA NE + - ACP C. "A (mh) t- — AGP Cl.. "E' TOTAL ACP OCPrI4 NW R} A C MSTRON 10' i n'PC •9• CuAi9 � TN D AJNAC AND SIDEWALK CAS CMENT TOD TREATLENT AND SNOW STEP A^,.E A R I E' J 2' SIDEWALK I'— T/C + D T' `I6 NINNUM WATER DEPTH ICA 2CD ` 0.9' MIWMUM )EPTH 1011 SICRAI MUM: A/AXIUUV MATER SURrACE CLEVATICV 1 DOES NOT ENCROACH ON FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA [R r.At AMA'' OfFKO: OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER W. 1026 BROADWAY AVE. SPOKANE. HA. 99260 - 0170 •s6 -3600 MISSION AVENUE EAST OF BARKER ROAD TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION XSECCO45.DV :C SHEET i o f 1 1 2' TRAFFIC 20' 30' EXIST. PAVEMENT EXIST. 12' 12' R/ TRAFFIC .0200 FT /FT MIN 5" COMPACTED CLASS "A' ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D_O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. 1 PROP. R/W BIKE LANE TYPICAL (NOT TO SCALE) EXIST. 4" COMPACTED CLASS "K ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/47. TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 6" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. MISSI 55' MODIFIED MISSION AVENUE CROSS SECTION STA. 14+98.96 TO STA. 15 +90.08 RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION 25' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE AND SLOPE EASEMENT 10' FUTURE ACQUISITION 1/ TYPE "B" CURB ON AVENUE '208' TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE CROSS - SECTION 15' 1 SIDEWALK 2% MIN rim INLAND giC PACIFIC ENGINEERING [ 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 ' (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 55' 40' PROP. R/W 15' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE AND SLOPE EASEMENT 30' EXIST. EXIST. E.O.P. R/W (FORMER. 10' FUTURE ACQUISITION) 8' 6' 12' 12' 1 14' 2' TRAFFIC TRAFFIC 4' J TRAFFIC .0200 FT /FT MIN '208' TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE SIDEWALK 2% MIN 5" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE TYPE "B" CURB CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN rn ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. o M co TYPICAL CROSS- SECTI r (NOT TO SCALE) 3 EXIST. 4" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 6" MISSION AVENUE = CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S,D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. MODIFIED MISSION AVENUE CROSS SECTION STA. 14 +98.96 TO STA. 15 +90.08 LT. RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION J rim 1 INLAND LC PACIFIC ENGINEERING E 707 West 7th • Sufte 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 .— FAX: (509) 458 -6844 _..... .— •r_ (SIDEWALK, SLOP DRAINAGE UTILITY ESMT.) (OLD RIGHT OF WAY) ° LOT 13, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1 ST ADD TION (SOUTH SIDE OF EXIST. HOUSE) (FACE OF CURB (TO FENCE) (NEW RIGHT OF WAY) MISSION AVENUE 5' I 14' NSTALL WHEELCHAIR RAMP RIVERWALK 7TH ADDITION 1 DATE 11/14/96 .� PRELIMINARY DEC 1 9 1996 0 R n En C. ire 707 West 7th • Suite Spoke ne, WA 99294 RE CEIVED DEC 13 lag SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SCALE: 1' =20' INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 205 (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -684- Gentlemen. encls S P O I< A N E .: -` t�izh ^` � C O U N T DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer December 18, 1996 Todd Whipple, P.E. • Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D., Phase 1 Plan Revisions: Mission Avenue/Harmony Lane Very truly yours 'Ilia . Joh ''. E. Spokane County Engineer cc: Spokane County Public Works Director: Dennis Scott, P.E. Spokane County Engineer's Office: Bill Hemmings, P.E. Ed Parry, P.E. Sponsor: Mark Hancock, Dean Housely Company, 16720 N.E. Project File 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director As you agreed to in your 13 Dec 96 conversation with Bill Hemmings of our office, "preliminary" submittals (i.e., not intended for County review /acceptance) would not need to bear a signed, dated P.E. stamp; however, the submittal would need to bear some sort of indication that it was indeed "preliminary ", such as a stamped marking. Submittals for the County's review /acceptance would need to bear a signed, dated P.E. stamp. We then received the enclosed submittal from you on 13 Dec 96, in which you request "[the County's] review and acceptance of the enclosed plans. "; this is essentially the same letter and plan set submitted on 10 Dec 96. This indicates to us that these are not preliminary plans, and implies that the plans should bear the signed, dated P.E. stamp. You will see that the plans bear neither a signed, dated P.E. stamp nor any marking indicating that they are "preliminary ". Please clarify the purpose of this submittal; based on your previous submittals and feedback provided by the County Engineer's staff, it would appear that we concur on the concept of the plan change. If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry at 456 -3600. Thank you. 116th Street, Redmond, WA 98052 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 December 13, 1996 IPE W.O. #96106 Spokane County Public Works Department Development Engineering Services 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane. Washington 99260 -0170 Attn: Ed Parry, Jr., P.E. Dear Ed: Documenr1961061rut, i re INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. RE: Riverwalk 1st Addition (P1414 -A) Revised sidewalk location and Mission Avenue cross - section Information for Evaluation of the Design Devation dated 11 -8 -96 In response to your fax of December 2nd to our office, please find enclosed a revised plan for the sidewalk location on Lot 13, Block 1 of Riverwalk 1st Addition. Please note that the west curb ramp has been realigned directly opposite the east curb ramp as you had requested. We have provided with this letter: 1.) A cross section for Mission Avenue as provided to us from your office for the approved cross section, for your easy reference. 2.) A cross section of Mission Avenue, modified for the area between the west plat boundary and the east curb return station on Mission. The approved cross section called out in the Conditions of Approval does not specify the width of the `208' treatment area, though the sidelopes and minimum depth require at Least 8.9' to the face of the sidewalk, including the .2' elevation above the top of curb elevation. The cross section has an 18' wide section for `208' treatment and snow storage, if the 10' future acquisition area is utilized. (See attached exhibit.) 3.) A cross section of Mission Avenue with an 8' cross section for `208' treatment and snow storage, which will be the case when a third lane is added to.Mission Avenue. (See attached exhibit.) Because there is no curb inlet along the existing curbline, we do not anticipate that there will 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509 -458 -6844 prnErtito DEC 1 3 1996 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suit 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 8381 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208-769 ?SPOKANE COL'W1Y ENGINEER Spokane County December 13, 1996 Page 2 be any '208' treatment in this cross section. Therefore, the need for storage, treatment and disposal at this time can be negated. The finished ground profile slopes from east to west, and at the time the commercial property is developed to the west of the Riverwalk 1st plat and Mission Avenue is extended, drainage for this area will need to be addressed. The basin map and drainage report in our files from North Idaho Engineering do not indicate any drainage improvements along this section of Mission Avenue. We respectfully remind you that the Riverwalk 1st plans were not designed by this firm, nor constructed under our supervision, and our recourse in helping Dean - Housley get this Design Deviation approved is limited to providing information to you of the existing as -built conditions. Your understanding in this regard is greatly appreciated. We are requesting your review and acceptance of the enclosed plans. Your prompt attention to this submittal would be greatly appreciated. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Inlaid Pacific gineering Company TRW /skm cc: file Enc. Do ummt196,031,uhI • Todd R. Whipple, P.E November 8, 1996 W.O. No. 96106 Spokane County Public Works W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Attn: Ed Parry, P.E. Dear Ed: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Re: Riverwalk 1st Addition Mission Avenue, Post Construction Design Deviation It is my understanding that you have had several conversations with Mark Hancock regarding the right -of -way and easement situation on Mission Avenue between Stations 15 +00 and 16 +00 along Lot 13, Block 1 at Riverwalk 1st Addition (RW1). Mark Hancock, with the Dean Housley Company, has indicated to me that he has discussed with both you and Dave Berto that the recorded plat is actually missing 10 -feet of slope, sidewalk and drainage easement area from that shown on the approved plans and referenced in the recorded plat. We believe that this has resulted from a misunderstanding of the difference between the easement and it's relationship to the future acquisition area. It appears that the 25 -foot slope, drainage, sidewalk and utility easement has included the 10 -foot future acquisition area within it. Based upon our review and our work on Riverwalk 7th addition it is apparent that these two should have remained separate and distinct. THEREFORE, THIS DESIGN DEVIATION PROPOSES A REVISION TO THE MISSION AVENUE APPROVED CROSS SECTION TO ONLY ALLOW A 15 -FOOT SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ADJACENT TO THE 10-FOOT FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA. THIS WOULD DEVIATE FROM THE APPROVED 25 -FOOT EASEMENT CALLED OUT ON THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPOKANE COUNTY SPECIAL SECTION. Included with this submittal are the following 1. A copy from the recorded plat map showing the existing 20 -foot ROW, the new dedicated 10 -feet of ROW, a 10 -foot future acquisition area and a 25 -foot sidewalk, slope, drainage and utility easement. Please note that on the plat this 25 foot easement is shown inaccurately as the 10 foot future acquisition area has been made part of this 25 foot easement rather than keeping them separate. This is where the discrepancy has occurred. 2. A copy of the Approved plan sheet of Mission Avenue within this area. 3. A copy of the Approved plan sheet of the special Mission Avenue section. 4. An exhibit showing how the house and fence were actually constructed on lot 13 block 1 of RW l . 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane County November 8, 1996 Page 2 We would like for you to note, that 1PEC was not the design engineer or the surveyor of record on either the plat or the approved plan set. The engineer and surveyor of record was North Idaho Engineering. We are only providing this design deviation as a service to the Dean Housley Co. Secondly, the house on Lot 13, is now sold and occupied so that there is no longer an option to revise the plat without making this lot unusable as the house would be within the 25 -foot easement. Lastly, a site visit has revealed that the sidewalk was constructed at the back of curb and will be removed and placed as far onto the lot as possible to be outside of the future acquisition area. Please see enclosed lot exhibit for proposed iocation. As usual your prompt attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated. Should you have any questions regarding this issue please feel free to call at 458 -6840. Sincerely, Inl. d Pacific dd R. Whipple, P:E. TRW /tw ineering Co., I cc: Dean - Housley, Mark Hancock file Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count PROJECT DESCRIPTION SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATE NOVEMBER 8, 1996 ROAD NAME IfISSION AVENUE CRP/RID # N/A NAME OF PLAT RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION Plat # PE- 1414 -81/95 ADDRESS OF BLDG N/A NAME OF BLDG PROJECT N/A BLDG# B9 N/A S _L_ T.Z52I R42 FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT # N/A PROJECT LIMITS EXISTING CONDITIONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: ROAD WIDTH 24'± 40' *_ ROAD SURFACE ACP ACP AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC 2400 ADT 3120 ADT PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION JUSTIFICATION: REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION $30.00 SEE ATTACHED LETTER SEE ATTACHED LETTER SUBMITTED BY TODD WHIPPLE INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING. INC. DATE NOVEMBER 8. 1996 ADDRESS 707 WEST 7TH AVENUE, SUITE 200. SPOKANE. WA ZIP CODE 99204 PHONE 5091 458 -6840 ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF 010.00 PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260 -0170 PHONE (509)456 -3600 FAX (509)324 -3478 - REQUEST WILL NOT BE REVIEWED WITHOUT FUNDS- CASH /CHECK # RECEIVED BY DATE . NO. YOUR INVOICE NO. INVOICE DATE INVOICE AMOUNT AMOUNT PAID DISCOUNT TAKEN NET CHECK AMOUNT o (a / G (I( yl / rzi a-Mio r■--- A-- C &e it- e / Sl-- G l INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. 1 THE IDER OF INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. 707 W. 7TH AVE., SUITE 200 SPOKANE, WA 99204 (509) 458 -6840 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS THIRTY AND NO GATE G SECURITY FEATURES INCLUDED. DETAILS ON BACK WASHINGTON TRUST.BANK SPOKANE, WA 99210 -2127 28- 8/1251 0582701 001186 LH' 1 :1251000891: /009764 14311' CONTROL NO. AMOUNT 11 -8 -96 $30_00 DOLLARS INLAND PACIFIC GENERAL ENG NT CO., INC. AU • ZED SIGNATURE 11861 [A UNPLATTED NOT A PART 0 n , _ ,. 6,7 6 N SF • 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND S B�Q "' • 4 UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP). o o • 6,736 SF 71 •I • • 10361') 589'54'16' N89 552.80' �\ N 89'S6'S0'w 627.62' o r - ED. SPOKANE MINI BRASS CAP AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD t42455 RP'S PER COUNTI RECORD. ;o,cao r r� ` 0 I X1 100.00' `- DRAINAGE EASENEN S89'S4'16'E �• o W 89'59'58'V • 103.63' o 6.41 SF in “1"cij 03636 VI ' ,___ L AUGUSTA LANE If) • 43 • .736 SF 98' N in • S89'54'16'EI o w 103.63' rt N o ` : 9� o 0 'Ai SF W to 0 o - �)• N89' 103. 6 63' a • cu 103.63' of A L. • 12 -1 vi 25' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE - ' 6,736 SF 1* -° AND UTILITY EASEMENT \• se94'6'eI EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEv TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL 'B' 13 n FOUND 1/2' RE 'BAR b 99 j v/ PLASTIC CAP 10' F IiTURE ACQUISITION AREA ---.. 9,391 SF `.`U^ j R1 S A22121 _� 25' 7C 90J0' /An' 49. cti o 2 as 6,741 SF ° }18�'S9'58'V 70.00' 25' o vl y ^ ^ 1 6,737 SF l2D'_g • MISSION AVENUE r L23N .0 L7 J N L8 0 1%) 0• } S 89'56'44' E 2615.78' (RL1) N 89'56'50' W 2615.78' 01) 1988.16' SEE SHEET 4 YISSIDN AYENUC CAL 12' tRAFF•L • 12' TMFnO/ S1T NN L PCR R -VALUE TESTING LANE ACP CI 'A' p ( m ti) L - CP Cl. 'E' TOTAL ACP OCPTH NOV RAN FUTURE ACCED9TON TYPE '9' CURS Al NNAC AND 90 ALK CASEMENT 1 8' 1 2' SIDEWALK 200 TREATVENT AND SNOW STORAGE • 2; PAN 1 - T /C OE2 1 8' NIMMUla WATER OEP TN I CA 206 0.9' MINIMUM DEPTH FOR SfCRM VOIUNE .MAKUUV WATER SURFACE ELEVAnav I DOGS NO1 ENCROACH ON FUTURE ACOIASIION AREA ®M XSEC0045.0 Drown By. Dolt E. J.P, 08/94 Oiagn,d B2: E.J.P. 08/94 Checking By, I SCALE HORIZONTAL: NONE VER TCAE: NONE OfTKIE Or SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER W. 1028 BROADWAY AVE, SPOKANE. WA. 9928D -0170 451-.3600 APPROVED: COUNT( ENGINEER Oa le: 9.. _ q Y MISSION AVENUE EAST OF 9ARKER ROAD TYPi CAL ROADWAY SECTION SHEET 1 Of 1 12' 12' TRAFFIC 20' 30' EXIST. PAVEMENT EXIST. 12' 4' TRAFFIC R/W .0200 FT/FT MIN 5" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7' COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. EX (ST. 4" COMPACTED CLASS "A' ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 6" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. BIKE LANE PROP. R/W 55' 25' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE AND SLOPE EASEMENT 10' FUTURE ACQUISITION 5: TYPE "B" CURB '208' TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE 4 TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION (NOT TO SCALE) MISSION AVENUE MODIFIED MISSION AVENUE CROSS SECTION STA. 14 +98.96 TO STA. 15 +90.08 RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION 15' 6 SIDEWALK 2% MIN INLAND i [ - se CACIFIC E NGINEERING 7 07 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -8840 Spokane, WA • 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844) Ce 55' 12' TRAFFIC 30' 12' TRAFFIC EXIST. EXIST. E.O.P. R/W 1 14' 4 1 TRAFFIC .0200 FT /F7 MIN 5" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" OMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. EXIST. 4" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 6" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. (FORMER 10' FUTURE A_.OUISI11ON) PROP. R/W 15' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE AND SLOPE EASEMENT 8' '208' TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE 5 6' SIDEWALK 2% MIN TYPE "B" CURB' TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION (NOT TO SCALE) MISSION AVENUE r MODIFIED MISSION AVENUE CROSS SECTION STA. 14 +98.96 TO STA. 15 +90.08 LT. r� INLAND � PACIFIC ENGINEERING RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 _ Spokane, WA 99204 • FM: (509) 45858�68YJ' (SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE UTILITY ESMT.) (OLD RIGHT OF WAY) ° (SOUTH SIDE OF EXIST, HOUSE) (FACE OF CURB (TO FENCE) (NEW RIGHT OF WAY) MISSION AVENUE z 14 ' 0 cC T. NSTALL WHEELCHAIR RAMP RIVERWALK 7TH ADDITION 1 LOT 13, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1 ST ADDITION DATE: 11/14 96 Spokane, WA 99204 RECEIVED DEC 1 SPOKANE COLINTVENGNEER SCALE: 1" =20' 1 rim' INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Surte 200 (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -684• (SIDEWALK, SLOPE DRAINAGE UTILITY ESMT.) (OLD RIGHT OF WAY) ( 9 LOT 13, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1 ST ADDITION ( " 4 (SOUTH SIDE OF EXIST. HOUSE) (NEW RIGHT OF WAY) MISSION AVENUE 5 (FACE OF CURB (TO FENCE) 1 14' RIVERWALK 7TH ADDITION 1 DATE: 11/14/95 RECEIVED NM 14 1996 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 707 West 7th • Suite Spokane, WA 99204 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 200 (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer December I1, 1996 Todd Whipple, P.E. Inland Pacific Engineering 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Mark Hancock Stanton Development/Dean Housely Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Bellevue, WA 98052 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Addition Revisions at Mission /Harmony Gentlemen: We note in your submittal (dated 10 Dec 96) of the plan revision at this location that neither the proposed plan nor section views bear a signed, dated, P.E. stamp. We are therefore returning this submittal unreviewed. Please ensure that all submittals conform to County standards. If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, William A. Johns, P. E. Spokane County Engineer E d ward (h P . Edward 11 Pa�/ }r , P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: project file reviewer • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 December 10, 1996 IPE W.O. #96106 Spokane County Public Works Department Development Engineering Services 1026 W Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 Attn: Ed Parry, Jr., P.E. Dear Ed: RE: Riverwalk 1st Addition (P1414 -A) Revised sidewalk location and Mission Avenue cross - section In response to your fax of December 2nd to our office, please find enclosed a revised plan for the sidewalk location on Lot 13, Block 1 of Riverwalk 1st Addition. Please note that the west curb ramp has been realigned directly opposite the east curb ramp as you had requested. We have provided with this letter: I PO INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. 1.) A cross section for Mission Avenue as provided to us from your office for the approved cross section, for your easy reference. 2.) A cross section of Mission Avenue, modified for the area between the west plat boundary and the east curb return station on Mission. The approved cross section called out in the Conditions of Approval does not specify the width of the `208' treatment area, though the sidelopes and minimum depth require at least 8.9' to the face of the sidewalk, including the .2' elevation above the'top of curb elevation. The cross section has an 18' wide section for '208' treatment and snow storage, if the 10' future acquisition area is utilized. (See attached exhibit.) 3.) A cross section of Mission Avenue with an 8' cross section for '208' treatment and snow storage, which will be the case when a third lane is added to Mission Avenue. (See attached exhibit.) Because there is no curb inlet along the existing curbline, we do not anticipate that there will be any '208' treatment in this cross section. Therefore, the need for stora DavmzNl%6105Uuh1 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509. 458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 20 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 - 765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 leatt DEC 1 0 1996 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Spokane County December 10, 1996 Page 2 disposal at this time can be negated. The finished ground profile slopes from east to west, and at the time the commercial property is developed to the west of the Riverwalk 1st plat and Mission Avenue is extended, drainage for this area will need to be addressed. The basin map and drainage report we have from North Idaho Engineering do not indicate any drainage improvements along this section of Mission Avenue. We respectfully remind you that the Riverwalk 1st plans were not designed by this firm, nor constructed under our supervision, and our recourse in helping Dean- Housley get this Design Deviation approved is limited to providing information to you of the existing as -built conditions. Your understanding in this regard is greatly appreciated. We are requesting your review and acceptance of the enclosed plans. Your prompt attention to this submittal would be greatly appreciated. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Inland Pacific E ering Company Todd R. Whipple, P.E TRW /skm cc: file Enc. oasonekis%Iaomi MISSM1 AVEM)E ESYM.) C/L M 12' ;RAMC • 12' TRAFFIC/ 2X MTN P 9 LANE aCP Cl. 'A' a• (mVN) L— ACP CL. 'E' TOTAL ACP DEPTH CSTC PC; R -VA:UE TESTING 1 FUTURE ACCESSION T19E '9' CURS A ' 0 D` /MACE MD SIDEWALK EASEMENT e Ix 200 TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE sILx v 2; L-i[C ♦ D.2' \ I 0' NINNUM WAWA DEPTH FOR 2Cs O.R' MINIMUM DEPTH P0A STORM V$UME MA %NUM WA1ER SERFAGE ELEVADCV GOES NOT ENCROACH ON FUTURE ACOUSIODN AREA m I.M a p(444' RECEIVED . DEC 10 1996 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 2 16 T. 0 A. T1 cou v EN R Drawn By Dale E.JP 08/94 Dealgned B): E.J.P. 08/94 Checked By. j SCALE HORIZONTAL: NONE VORTICAL: NONT SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER W. 1026 BROADWAY At SPOKANE, WA, 9020D -0170 36d0 APPROVED: COUNTY ENGINEER Dale: 4. 4 MISSION AVENUE EAST OF 9ARKER ROAD TYPICAL ROADWAY SEC SHEET 1 of 1 XSEC0045.0WG 12' TRAFFIC 20' 30' EXIST. PAVEMENT EXIST. -1 12' 12' R/W TRAFFIC .0200 FT/F7 MIN 5" COMPACTED CLASS "A' ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" OMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. EXIST. 4" COMPACTED CLASS "A' ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 6" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. 4' BIKE LANE r PROP.. R/W 55* 25' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE AND SLOPE EASEMENT 10' FUTURE ACQUISITION MISSION AVENUE 5: 7 TYPE "B" CURB '208' TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE A ; 1 TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION (NOT TO SCALE) 15' 6' SIDEWALK 2% MIN P 4- TLPrri e RECEIVED DEC 10 1996' SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER MODIFIED MISSION AVENUE CROSS SECTION STA. 14 +98.96 TO STA. 15 +90.08 RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION INLAND I mo - iC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 Spokane, WA 99204 12' TRAFFIC 30' 12' TRAFFIC EXIST. EXIST E.O.P. , R/W 2 14' • TRAFFIC 55' .0200 FT /FT MIN 5" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. (NOT EXIST. 4" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 6" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. (FORMER 10' FUTURE ACOUISITi0N) PROP. R/W TO SCALE) r 15' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE AND SLOPE EASEMENT 8' '208' TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE TYPE "B" CURB cama 6' SIDEWALK 2% MIN TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION MISSION AVENUE RECEIVED DEC 10 1996 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER MODIFIED MISSION AVENUE CROSS SECTION STA. 14 +98.96 TO STA. 15 +90.08 LT. RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION Ir. INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 438 -6840 ` Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 (BUILDING SETBACK) 9 i (SIDEWALK, SLOPE DRAINAGE UTILITY ESMT.) (OLD RIGHT OF WAY) N (SOUTH SIDE OF EXIST. HOUSE) {FACE OF CURB - (TO FENCE) (NEW RIGHT OF WAY) in a MISSION AVENUE 5' 4// NSTAL WHEELCHAIR RAMP RIVERWALK 7TH ADDITION 1 TWA RECEIVED DEC 101936 SPOKANECW NTY EpGINEER SCALE: 1' =20' LOT 13, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1 ST ADDITION DATE: 11 ,14 96 • 1 lir INLAND NC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458 -6844 December 12, 1996 W.O. No. 96106 Spokane County Public Works W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Attn: Bill Johns, P.E. Re: County Stamping Requirements Dear Bill: Bill, I am so tired of having things returned with the enclosed letter from your office that I finally thought that it was time that you and your office understand what needs to be stamped and what does not. I called the Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors on this issue and they pointed out to me some guidance that had been printed in one of their newsletters, copies of these are enclosed. The Board indicated to me that general correspondence dealing with PROPOSED ACTIONS DO NOT HAVE TO BE STAMPED until the final plans and specifications are submitted. They indicated that when you stamp everything, it becomes to difficult to account for everything that was stamped when trying to void all of the proposed material if changes to the proposals occur. This means everyone's liability goes up, including the County for requiring final stamps on proposals. Therefore, you MUST advise your staff as to the boards status on this issue. The two excerpts mailed to you were from the December 1989 and January 1991 New Bulletins from the Board. Thank you for you time. Sincerely, Inla Pacific ErLeering Co., I c. Todd R. Whipple, P.E. TRW /tw 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509. 458.6844 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. cc: Phil Harris, Spokane County Commissioner Dennis Scott, Spokane County Director of Public Works file 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 87814 208. 765 -7784 • FAX: 208.769 -7277 RECEIVED DEC 1 3 iU'ad SPOKANE COUti I Y Et1Gll IE.E RECEIVED DEC 1 2 1996 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Description Purpose Remarks CC: xg r Information Written Approval r ire INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458.6844 TO: _ y'..6; ATTENTION: a Y DATE: I 9k I.P.E. PROJECT #• %to C P1j�J� N)P 5144- Xerox Prints 0 Copy of Letter Li Original Drawing n Contract Documents Q Work Authorization U Report n No. Copies Description / e.- K-1 /nl OtGi4& 0 Review & Comments Signature & Return gr Per Your Request f eves Wit, . U Cie' �4 ,c1/40-afibLei Groin yo bui /ay C_ c 90 fft Gum D]TRNSMT.PMS a 7: 47 FA OEG p 4 1996 ° .. " „,, ` :' : 1TY `_°Ir_iyap Signed: .i/V Description Purpose Remarks CC: xg r Information Written Approval r ire INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458.6844 TO: _ y'..6; ATTENTION: a Y DATE: I 9k I.P.E. PROJECT #• %to C P1j�J� N)P 5144- Xerox Prints 0 Copy of Letter Li Original Drawing n Contract Documents Q Work Authorization U Report n No. Copies Description / e.- K-1 /nl OtGi4& 0 Review & Comments Signature & Return gr Per Your Request f eves Wit, . U Cie' �4 ,c1/40-afibLei Groin yo bui /ay C_ c 90 fft Gum D]TRNSMT.PMS NOU -12 -1996 12:06 INLAND PACIFIC ENG c)0\9 %Io lo1 P.02 NOV -12 -1996 12:05 INLAND PACIFIC ENG I r� INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Telephone - (509) 458 -6840 FAX - (509) 458 -6844 ■ NOTES: ED DATE: ■ TO: (I - 12- 1 (0 el) TAR.R at ye IN COMPANY: ''o Co. ■ FAX NUMBER: 5Z.4- 54 • FROM: S- ka Rui • NUMBER OF PAGES: INCL COVER PAGE kze-ts teRt 8F - T't4F SaEI PT �m c cSlat— s Z 14Atleu `T - yete.6tenIt3 TRW" 11LSED StDt A1-►L Loc.A- - nel0-.. D lS oc-cr &f The oFncE TIrf* AI-)D WA-UUJ E1 LV b4AT WC- Werra ►tt TUG 'PROPOSED [5' Ez- {M.T, 1 ' M /COT lite' IF 14-E LC ifib - D/ LLYIB,Jp tO E "T 2t P. LocA w so A-T 'fRE - Nor _ tsiF TAE ESMT OIL runlet` Iop-- S t t I M, .Mr l5 A-t so 1r612> Stc PE . wt4E3 LLJEI) ►... ' t<t_ TA-tE IT i. :a_ r m 41 M Alk t) S11D /Deuvett A- R vtse-o buobl P.01 JOB NUMBER quiOto FAX TRANSMISSION III USTA ( (L 30' b. 89' 4'16 2 vi 6,736 SF " } `° 3' S89 '54'16 13 a m 9,391 Sr A R 2` B.S. LJ 0 0 00 • Cr • v- o 0 z c L23N N a 9010 4 111iilNctf1Ar 5 0 O O 18 17 /- FOUND 1/2' REBAR V/ PLASTIC CAP RI S 4221A UNPLATTED NUT A PART N89'56'50' V NB9'56'50'W 25' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE - AND UTILITY EASEMENT EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VeEV TRIANGLE --� SEE DETAIL ' v 10 EIiiJRE ACQUISITION AREA N� - TO. SPl7KANE CLIUNl Y BRASS CAP AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #2455 RP'S PER COUNTY RECORD. 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT {i'YP) 552.80' J 627.62' O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1n d :OfJb 589'54'16'C 103.63' : 7 �o 6,736 SF ,o N89•54'16'Vj • 103.63' • ,76 SF v ' �c S89'54'16'E1 (Ft 103.63' v1 ai (U $ 9 � o i 6,736 SFa "1 o V7 N69'54'1.6'V °tea N 103.63' 10 - � 6,736 SF ]] t 5AV6 T ll ro 6236 SF .a MISSION AVENUE f" 100,00' _^ IN89'59'S8•V 6,4)1 SF :_.w vNi cu B00 ?' de 1 N 2 lr 0 6,741 SF 4 Z 70.00' o +n 25' q�ru r [y= 0' 1 6,737 SF L_2a j L7 a J 0 U'] On CU O 0 z 5 89'56'44' E 2615.78' (RL1) N 89'56'50' V 2615.78' (M) DRAINAGE EASFMEN L2 N o o AUGUSTA LANE 1988.16' SEE SHEET 4 (SOUTH SIDE OF EXIST. HOUSE) x (SIDEWALK, SLOPE,-N DRAINAGE UTILITY ESMT.) (OLD RIGHT OF WAY) ° x x (FACE OF CURB (TO FENCE) (BUILDING SETBACK) (NEW RIGHT OF WAY) 1 MISSION AVENUE 1 SCALE: 1" =20' LOT 13, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION 11/08/96 1 INLAND miC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane. WA 99204 (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 4$8 -6844 (SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE UTILITY ESMT.) (OLD RIGHT OF WAY) k (SOUTH SIDE OF EXIST. HOUSE) io {�wmpni_a wman.. ngearc, ern, �vremn ns M LOT 13, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION x. .x . (FACE OF CURB (TO FENCE) (BUILDING SETBACK) (FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA) (NEW RIGHT OF WAY) 11/08/96 a:o MISSION AVENUE 1 W SCALE: 1" =20' f INLAND iC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 Spokane, WA 99204 November 8, 1996 W.O. No. 96106 Spokane County Public Works W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Attn: Ed Parry, P.E Dear Ed: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Re: Riverwalk 1st Addition Mission Avenue, Post Construction Design Deviation 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509 -458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 NUV U U SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER It is my understanding that you have had several conversations with Mark Hancock regarding the right -of -way and easement situation on Mission Avenue between Stations 15 +00 and 16 +00 along Lot 13, Block 1 at Riverwalk 1st Addition (RW1). Mark Hancock, with the Dean Housley Company, has indicated to me that he has discussed with both you and Dave Berto that the recorded plat is actually missing 10 -feet of slope, sidewalk and drainage easement area from that shown on the approved plans and referenced in the recorded plat. We believe that this has resulted from a misunderstanding of the difference between the easement and it's relationship to the future acquisition area. It appears that the 25 -foot slope, drainage, sidewalk and utility easement has included the l0 -foot future acquisition area within it. Based upon our review and our work on Riverwalk 7th addition it is apparent that these two should have remained separate and distinct. THEREFORE, THIS DESIGN DEVIATION PROPOSES A REVISION TO THE MISSION AVENUE APPROVED CROSS SECTION TO ONLY ALLOW A 15 -FOOT SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ADJACENT TO THE 10 -FOOT FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA. THIS WOULD DEVIATE FROM THE APPROVED 25 -FOOT EASEMENT CALLED OUT ON THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPOKANE COUNTY SPECIAL SECTION. Included with this submittal are the following 1. A copy from the recorded plat map showing the existing 20 -foot ROW, the new dedicated 10 -feet of ROW, a 10 -foot future acquisition area and a 25 -foot sidewalk, slope, drainage and utility easement. Please note that on the plat this 25 foot easement is shown inaccurately as the 10 foot future acquisition area has been made part of this 25 foot easement rather than keeping them separate. This is where the discrepancy has occurred. 2. A copy of the Approved plan sheet of Mission Avenue within this area. 3. A copy of the Approved plan sheet of the special Mission Avenue section. 4. An exhibit showing how the house and fence were actually constructed on lot 13 block 1 ofRW1. Spokane County November 8, 1996 Page 2 We would like for you to note, that IPEC was not the design engineer or the surveyor of record on either the plat or the approved plan set. The engineer and surveyor of record was North Idaho Engineering. We are only providing this design deviation as a service to the Dean Housley Co. Secondly, the house on Lot 13, is now sold and occupied so that there is no longer an option to revise the plat without making this lot unusable as the house would be within the 25 -foot easement. Lastly, a site visit has revealed that the sidewalk was constructed at the back of curb and will be removed and placed as far onto the lot as possible to be outside of the future acquisition area. Please see enclosed lot exhibit for proposed location. As usual your prompt attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated. Should you have any questions regarding this issue please feel free to call at 458 -6840. Sincerely, Inl. d Pacific ineering Co., TRW /tw hip le, P.E. cc: Dean - Housley, Mark Hancock file December 13, 1996 IPE W.O. #96106 Attn: Ed Parry, Jr., P.E. Dear Ed: We have provided with this letter: i re INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. ?e,k/seA MI 19 1140 Spokane County Public Works Department Development Engineering Services 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 DEC 1 9 1;;;;6 RE: Riverwalk 1st Addition (P1414 -A) Revised sidewalk location and Mission Avenue cross - section COUNTY ENLuj; R Information for Evaluation of the Design Devation dated T 8 6� In response to your fax of December 2nd to our office, please find enclosed a revised plan for the sidewalk location on Lot 13, Block 1 of Riverwalk 1st Addition. Please note that the west curb ramp has been realigned directly opposite the east curb ramp as you had requested. I.) A cross section for Mission Avenue as provided to us from your office for the approved cross section, for your easy reference. 2.) A cross section of Mission Avenue, modified for the area between the west plat boundary and the east curb return station on Mission. The approved cross section called out in the Conditions of Approval does not specify the width of the `208' treatment area, though the sidelopes and minimum depth require at least 8.9' to the face of the sidewalk, including the .2' elevation above the top of curb elevation. The cross section has an 18' wide section for '208' treatment and snow storage, if the 10' future acquisition area is utilized. (See attached exhibit.) 3.) A cross section of Mission Avenue with an 8' cross section for `208' treatment and snow storage, which will be the case when a third lane is added to Mission Avenue. (See attached exhibit.) Because there is no curb inlet along the existing curbline, we do not anticipate that there will Oocunrrul961066ub1 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509 -458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suit Coeur d'Alene, ID 8381 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208.769 Rrn WED DEC: 1 3 1996 205 73POKANE GiiUNIN ENGINEER Spokane County December 13, 1996 Page 2 be any `208' treatment in this cross section. Therefore, the need for storage, treatment and disposal at this time can be negated. The finished ground profile slopes from east to west, and at the time the commercial property is developed to the west of the Riverwalk 1st plat and Mission Avenue is extended, drainage for this area will need to be addressed. The basin map and drainage report in our files from North Idaho Engineering do not indicate any drainage improvements along this section of Mission Avenue. We respectfully remind you that the Riverwalk 1st plans were not designed by this firm, nor constructed under our supervision, and our recourse in helping Dean - Housley get this Design Deviation approved is limited to providing information to you of the existing as -built conditions. Your understanding in this regard is greatly appreciated. We are requesting your review c of the enclosed Wi s. Your prompt attention to this submittal would be greatly appreciated. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Inlagd Pacific gineering Company TRW /skm cc: file Enc. Docment196I lrubl • Todd R. Whipple, P.E November 8, 1996 W.O. No. 96106 Dear Ed: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Spokane County Public Works W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Attn: Ed Parry, P.E. Re: Riverwalk 1st Addition Mission Avenue, Post Construction Design Deviation It is my understanding that you have had several conversations with Mark Hancock regarding the right -of -way and easement situation on Mission Avenue between Stations 15 +00 and 16 +00 along Lot 13, Block 1 at Riverwalk 1st Addition (RW1). Mark Hancock, with the Dean Housley Company, has indicated to me that he has discussed with both you and Dave Berto that the recorded plat is actually missing 10 -feet of slope, sidewalk and drainage easement area from that shown on the approved plans and referenced in the recorded plat. We believe that this has resulted from a misunderstanding of the difference between the easement and it's relationship to the future acquisition area. It appears that the 25 -foot slope, drainage, sidewalk and utility easement has included the 10 -foot future acquisition area within it. Based upon our review and our work on Riverwalk 7th addition it is apparent that these two should have remained separate and distinct. THEREFORE, THIS DESIGN DEVIATION PROPOSES A REVISION TO THE MISSION AVENUE APPROVED CROSS SECTION TO ONLY ALLOW A 15 -FOOT SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ADJACENT TO THE 1O -FOOT FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA. THIS WOULD DEVIATE FROM THE APPROVED 25 -FOOT EASEMENT CALLED OUT ON THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPOKANE COUNTY SPECIAL SECTION. 707 West 71h • Suite 200 3020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Included with this submittal are the following 1. A copy from the recorded plat map showing the existing 20 -foot ROW, the new dedicated 10 -feet of ROW, a 10 -foot future acquisition area and a 25 -foot sidewalk, slope, drainage and utility easement. Please note that on the plat this 25 foot easement is shown inaccurately as the 10 foot future acquisition area has been made part of this 25 foot easement rather than keeping them separate. This is where the discrepancy has occurred. 2. A copy of the Approved plan sheet of Mission Avenue within this area. 3. A copy of the Approved plan sheet of the special Mission Avenue section. 4. An exhibit showing how the house and fence were actually constructed on lot 13 block 1 ofRW1. Spokane County November 8, 1996 Page 2 We would like for you to note, that IPEC was not the design engineer or the surveyor of record on either the plat or the approved plan set. The engineer and surveyor of record was North Idaho Engineering. We are only providing this design deviation as a service to the Dean Housley Co. Secondly, the house on Lot 13, is now sold and occupied so that there is no longer an option to revise the plat without making this lot unusable as the house would be within the 25 -foot easement. Lastly, a site visit has revealed that the sidewalk was constructed at the back of curb and will be removed and placed as far onto the lot as possible to be outside of the future acquisition area. Please see enclosed lot exhibit for proposed location. As usual your prompt attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated. Should you have any questions regarding this issue please feel free to call at 458 -6840. Sincerely, Inl. d Pacific dd R Whipple, P:E. TRW /tw ineering Co., I cc: Dean - Housley, Mark Hancock file ROAD NAME MISSION AVENUE NAME OF PLAT RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION ADDRESS OF BLDG N/A NAME OF BLDG PROJECT N/A FEDERAIJSTATE PROJECT # N/A PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION SEE ATTACHED LETTER JUSTIFICATION: ADDRESS PHONE# (509) 458 -6840 REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION $30.00 SEE ATTACHED LETTER 707 WEST 7TH AVENUE SUITE 200. SPOKANE, WA CASH /CHECK # RECEIVED BY DATE DATE NOVEMBER 8, 1996 CRP/RID # N/A Plat # PE- 1414 - 81/95 BLDG #B9 N/A S T _2,5M R4.51 PROJECT LIMITS EXISTING CONDITIONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: ROAD WIDTH 24'± 40'± ROAD SURFACE ACP ACP AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC 2400 ADT 3120 ADT Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count SEE ATTACHED LETTER . SUBMITTED BY TODD WHIPPLE P.E. INLAND PACIF C ENG_NEERNG INC. DATE NOVEMBER 8. 1996 ZIP CODE 99204 ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF 530.00 PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY * * * * * ** 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260 -0170 PHONE (509)456 -3600 FAX (509)324 -3478 - REQUEST WILL NOT BE REVIEWED WITHOUT FUNDS- . NO. YOUR INVOICE NO. INVOICE DATE INVOICE AMOUNT AMOUNT PAID DISCOUNT TAKEN NET CHECK AMOUNT MAI +` O Vi e l c e kioz,fr1/Jjt G ;xi__ II'' 11 J ;a INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. .r 1 THE IDER OF INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. 707 W. 7TH AVE., SUITE 200 SPOKANE, WA 99204 (509) 458-6840 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS THIRTY AND NO- DATE 0 SECURITY FEATURES INCLUDED. DETAILS ON BACK WASHINGTON TRUST BANK SPOKANE, WA 99210-2127 298/1251 0582701 !00 1 L86 10 I: L251.000891: L009 76 1 CONTROL NO. AMOUNT 11 -8 -96 $30_00 - DOLLARS INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. GENERAL ACCOUNT 11861 NN LJ W [r) 0 0 M � 00 1 0 0 (.•) ti r UNPLATTED NOT A PART N89'56'50'W 627.62' b -F D. SPOKANE COUNI Y BRASS CAP AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #2455 RP'S PER COUNT'r RECORD. ;o p,'ao sr ?c tta x S89'S4'16'CH ol¢ 103.63' I 0 = • 7 g o • 6,736 SFl • N89•54'16'Vi • 103.63' • g_ N 6, 7P6 SFr} t ° 3 ,n S09'54'16'E o v1 103.63' d cJ w 0 9 = o b r .16,736 SF W In o0 o rn N89'5416'v°1 ▪ o N 103.63' • Z o 10 c 6 ,736 6 , 4'1 (, � sF 11 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND 5 T UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) o ll a '0 6 ,736 SF tic • 10363' 1 89•54'161E N • 2 V1l 25' SIDE`.'ALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE- 'O 6,73 SF 7 `' AND UTILITY EASEMENT S09p51' EASEMENT FOk CLEAR v1EV TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL '9' 13 di-..‘ /-. FOUND 1/2' REBAR o / vi PLASTIC CAP 10' i UTURE ACQUISITION AREA -, \ 9,391 SF R1 S n22121 I I �� � 1 B.S. 25' • N89•56'50'V 552:80' J 1 I 1 25' LJ 0 O 0 0 • 0 Z MISSION AVENUE . 20'. A6'- 2 6,741 SF }1B '59'58' V 70.00' c 25'n -T-. I- 1 to 6,737 SF • (.._20 _35� L23N L7 J 100.00' INB9 4451 SF N O 0 1/) m W 0 O O 0 0 0 Z lJ N 0 S 89'56'44' E 2615,78' (RL1) N 89'56'50' W 2615,78' (M) .g AUGUSTA LANE `-.DRAINAGE EASEMEN ' 1988.16' SEE SHEET 4 11I53CY AVENUE (SnW CAL 12' TRAFT.0 • 121 A 3 IMPnCA on LANE ACP CL. A' A• (mkt) L-- ACP ct. 'E• TOTAL ACP OEPTH CSTC PER R - :uE TESTING HEW 10' FUTURE ACCUISTRON TYPE '9' CURS MQTN AS RLQVIrR�EO DAAINACE MD SpEWMK CASEMENT 200 TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE I 8' 1 2_ SIDEWALK 2% 14N L-T/E + 0.2' I 8 NINNMLI WATEPT0 2C8 0.9' MINIMUM )EP TH r H SE M I OWME MAX NUM MATER ENCROACH ON ELEVATION ODES NOT ENCROACH ON FUTURE ACOURIODN AREA ®na Malta E QaTn SCALE Oeegned By :. E.J.P. 08/94 Checked By. j HORIZONTAL: NONE VERTICAL: NONr OFFICE Of SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER W. 1026 BROADWAY AVE. SPOKANE, WA. 99283 -0170 4 50 -3800 APPROVED: COUNTY ENGINEER Gold: Q MISSION AVENUE EAST OF BARKER ROAD TYPICA ROADWAY SECTION XSEC0045.OV:C SHEET 1 of 1 12' TRAFFIC 20' 30' EXIST. PAVEMENT EXIST. 12' 12' TRAFFIC R/W .0200 FT /fl MIN 5" COMPACTED CLASS "A' ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. 4' BIKE LANE PROP. R/W 55' 25' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE AND SLOPE EASEMENT 10' FUTURE ACQUISITION 5: TYPE "B" CURB '208' TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE MODIFIED MISSION AVENUE CROSS SECTION STA. 14+98.96 TO STA. 15 +90.08 RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION TYPICAL CROSS - SECTION (NOT TO SCALE) EXIST. 4" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 6" MISSION AVENUE COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S. D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. 1 15' 6' SIDEWALK 2% MIN Fri r 2 J INLAND � INC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 456 -8840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 55' 12' TRAFFIC 30' 12' TRAFFIC EXIST. EXIST. E.O.P. R/W 121 14' TRAFFIC .0200 FT /FT MIN 5" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. (FORMER 10' FUTURE ACOUISI T ION) PROP. R/W r amaa 4 01y' Au 15' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE AND SLOPE EASEMENT 8' '208' TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE TYPE "B" CURB 6' SIDEWALK 2% MIN EXIST. 4" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 ON COMPACTED CRUSHED SUURFACNG % B SE SE w MISSION AVENUE ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. TYPICAL CROSS—SECTIasq (NOT TO SCALE) 23 In r MODIFIED MISSION AVENUE CROSS SECTION STA. 14 +98.96 TO STA. 15 +90.08 LT. RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION 1 �� INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 •••• 11/4.anaolsweisbasaassaasla—saataa-alasilialtllas" (SIDEWALK, SLOP DRAINAGE UTILITY ESMT.) (OLD RIGHT OF WAY). c LOT 13, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1 ST ADDITION (SOUTH SIDE OF EXIST. HOUSE) (FACE CF CURB (TO FENCE) / 7/17 - (UTURE ACQUISITION AREA) lir (NEW RIGHT OF WAY) MISSION AVENUE 5 w z a • 14' z 1 N STALL WHEELCHAIR RAMP RIVERWALK 7TH ADDITION 1 DATE: 11(14 96 PRELIMINARY I R E. C. RECEIVED DEC i 3 SPOKANE COU ENGINEER SCALE: 1" =20' 1 P ® INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 71.11 • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAY(: (509)i 458 -684- ROBERT D. CRAY, P.L.S., Chairman Oak Harbor WESLEY TAFT, P.E. Tacoma ROY A. AVENT, P.E. Seattle BOARD OF REGISTRATION FOR UMESH VASISHTH pa PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS CHARLES SALINA, P.E. P.O. BOX 9649 Richland DAN R. WALTZ. P.E. OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98504 Bellevue Bellevue Board Staff (206) 753 -3634 JERRY C. OLSON, P.E.. P.L.S. Applications (206) 753 -6966 Vancouver DATE: July 1991 TO: EXPIRES 2/30/93 STATE OF WASHINGTON M E M O R A N D U M FROM: Board of Registration SUBJECT: AMENDED. SEAL /STAMP DESIGN RECEIVED JUN 2 91995 Please note that each seal /stamp is to contain the licensee's certificate number and a space to indicate the date of license expiration. Licensees may choose to imprint all or part of their date of expiration on the seal /stamp, however, said imprinting is not required. Illustrated below are acceptable examples of the date of expiration imprint: EXPIRES 2/30/ (YEAR LEFT BLANK TO BE COMPLETED ON THE DOCUMENT) EXPIRES (REMAINDER LEFT BLANK FOR COMPLETION ON THE DOCUMENT) No other form or format of professional seal /stamp is authorized by the. Board of Registration. We call your special attention to the following: 1. Individuals licensed as both an engineer and a land surveyor must obtain one seal /stamp for each license. A seal /stamp containing both designations is'not' permitted. Designation of an individual's qualifying branch of engineering' (e.g. civil, mechanical, etc.) on the Seal/stamp is also not permitted. BPOKANH CO NT Professional Engineers and Pro fPeetneRAt RTM P Land Surveyors On May 3, 1991 the Board of Registration adopted an amendment to the Washington Administrative Code (WAC 196 -24 -095) which revises the design of the seal /stamp for all registrants. A copy of the amended rule, including the seal /stamp design, is attached for your reference. Page 2 3. The Board of Registration does not recognize the use of a "corporate seal /stamp" as meeting the requirements of law (RCW 18.43.070) or this rule. This amended rule became effective on June 22, 1991, however, compliance with the new seal /stamp design is not required until APRIL 1, 1992. Please read the attached rule carefully. You will note that the rule amendment also revised the definition of "under direct supervision ". If your seal /stamp manufacturer requires any information in addition to that enclosed, please have them contact the Board's office at (206) 753 -3634. A copy of the state law provision (RCW 18.43.070) pertaining to Certificates and Seals is also attached for your reference. RCW_ "18.43.070 Certificates and seals. The director of licensing shall issue a certificate of registration upon payment of a registration fee as provided for in this chapter, to any applicant who, in the opinion of the board, has satisfactorily met all the requirements of this chapter. In case of a registered engineer, the certificate shall authorize the practice of "professional engineering" and specify the branch or branches in which specialized, and in case of a registered land surveyor, the certificate shall authorize the practice of "land surveying ". In the case of a registered professional engineer also qualified as land surveyor but one certificate shall be issued. In case of engineer -in- training, the certificate shall state that the applicant has successfully passed the ex- amination in fundamental engineering subjects required by the board and has been enrolled as an "engineer -in- training". All certificates of registration shall show the full name of the registrant, shall have a serial number, and shall be signed by the chairman and the secretary of the board and by the director of licensing. The issuance of a certificate of registration by the di- rector of licensing shall be prima facie evidence that the person named therein is entitled to all the rights and privileges of a registered professional engineer or a reg- istered land surveyor, while the said certificate remains unrevoked and unexpired. Each registrant hereunder shall upon registration ob- tain a seal of the design authorized by the board, bear- ing the registrant's name and the legend "registered professional engineer" or 'registered land surveyor ". Plans, specifications, plats and reports prepared by the registrant shall be signed, dated, and stamped with said seal or facsimile thereof. Such signature and stamping shall constitute a certification by the registrant that the same was prepared by or under his direct supervision and that to his knowledge and belief the same was pre- pared in accordance with the requirements of the stat- ute. It shall be unlawful for anyone to stamp or seal any document with said seal or facsimile thereof after the certificate of registrant named thereon has expired or been revoked, unless said certificate shall have been re- newed or reissued. [1959 c 297 § 4; 1947 c 283 § 10; Rem. Supp. 1947 § 8306 -27. Prior: 1935 c 167 §§ 8, 13; RRS § 8306 -8, 13.] Reviser's note: The term 'director of licenses" has been changed to 'director of licensing' in this section. Scc RCW 43.24.020. (1990 Laws) WAC 196 - 005 Seals. The design and format of the seal and or stamp authorized by the board will con- form to the following examples: Embossing seals or rubber stamps are equally accept- able. The impression or image of the seal /stamp shall be no smaller than one and three - quarter inches and no larger than two inches. The seal /stamp shall contain the following minimum information: EXPIRES a. State of Washington b. Registered professional engineer or registered pro- fessional land surveyor c. Certificate number d. Registrant's name as shown on wall certificate Other than described and illustrated herein, no other form or format for professional seals /stamps is author- ized by the board. All seals /stamps shall conform to this design and format by no later than April I, 1992. When a registrant places a seal on a document, the registrant must: Sign in permanent ink across the face of said seal, place date that signature was applied immediately adja- cent to said signature and indicate date of license expi- ration. Engineers or land surveyors shall not affix their signature and seal to any engineering or land surveying plan or document dealing with subject matter outside their field of competence nor to any plan or document not prepared under their direct supervision. "Under direct supervision" shall be construed to mean that the registrant who provide(s) such supervision, and who intends to affix his or her signature and seal, shall have exercised his or her professional judgment by way of regular participation in developing the engineering and /or land surveying matters that are embodied in the plans, designs, specifications or other documents in- volved in the work. [Statutory Authority: RCW 18.43- .035. 91- 11 -099, § 196 -24 -095, filed 5/22/91, effective 6/22/91; 82 -01 -064 (Order 81 -10), § 196-24 -095, filed 12/18/81.] In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of covenants and agrees that: 1. The subdivider /sponsor will construct the private roads and associated drainage facilities in confomiance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 2. A lot is seled by a private road when: a. the only mad frontage for the lot in the Development is on the private road, or; b. a lot having frontage on more than one road (public or private) constructs an approach to the private road. 3. The Horne Owners Association or their successors in interest shall maintain the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 4. The owner(s) of any lot created by the Development or alternation thereof and served by a private road shall be responsible for maintenance of said private road, including associated drainage facilities. S Maintenance financing of the private roads and associated drainage facilities shall be in a manner determined by the Home Owners Association or their successors in interest. 6. Should the Home Owners Association be terminated for any reason, the successors in interest shall be the individual lot owners, or their successors in interest, who are members of the Home Owners Association at the time of said termination. 7. In the event such private road including associated drainage facilities is improved to Spokane County standards for public streets, and the County is willing to accept the dedication of such mad and drainage facilities, each lot owner shall execute any documents necessary .lo accomplish such dedication. 8. Owners of lots within the Development who are served by such road, may sue and recover damages and attorneys' fees from any owner of any lot within the Development which is similarly served who refuses to participate in the road and drainage facilities construction, financing, and maintenance. 9. WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, or maintain or otherwise service the private roads, and associated drainage facilities contained within or providing service to the property described in the Development. By accepting this development or subsequently by allowing a building permit to he issued for property on a private mad, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind of nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road or its' associated drainage facilities. 10. Whenever the Home Owners Association or their successors in interest fail to maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved drainage plan, a notice will be given to the Ilome Owners Association or their successors in interest by the County. If not corrected after 10 days, the County has the right to correct the maintenance failure or have it corrected at the expense of the Home Owners Association, their successors in interest, or lots in the development. 11. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas, no the responsibility for any drainage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. 12. This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road and drainage facilities as provided herein. STATE OF WASHINGTON County of Spokane k\ 4cd.n.l d IA] OWNER DECLARATION OF COVENANT (hereinafter referred to as the "Development "), the undersigned OWNER Dated this day of 19 . On this day personally appeared before me known to Inc to be the described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she /they signed the same as his /her /their flee and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this _ day of , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane July 12, 1994 Dave Burrell Spokane County Engineers 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99206 -0170 Dear Mr. Burtell; The standard dedication language that we would like to see on plats for utility easements is as follows: "Utility easements shown on the herein described plat are hereby dedicated to the serving utility companies for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of utilities. Together with the right to inspect said utilities and to trim and/or remove brush and trees that may interfere with the construction, maintenance and operation of the same." Sincer�W: _ nald J. Malisani SRJWA Supervisor, Real Estate Washington Water Power The Washington Water Power Company P.O. Box 3727 Spokane. Washington 99220 (509) 489 -0500 / 1 -800- 727 -9170 SERVING EASTERN WASHINGTON AND NORTHERN IDAHO WITH ELECTRICITY AND NATURAL GAS RECEIVED JUL 1 5 1994 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Sight distance easements in Lot(s) , and , Block , as platted and shown hereon, are hereby, granted to Spokane County and its authorized agents for the sole purpose of allowing a clear view sight distance triangle over and across the easements. The owners of said lots agree not to obstruct or in any.manner allow any obstacle to block this clear view triangle between a height of three (3) feet and a height of seven (7) feet above the road pavement elevation adjacent to said lots. .Spokane County and its authorized agents are hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to, over and from said easements for the purpose of inspection and emergency maintenance of the sight distance area. If the property owner fails to maintain the sight distance area in reasonable conformance with the approved plans on file in the Office of the Spokane County Engineer, a notice of such failure may be given to the property owner. If not corrected after ten (10) days, Spokane County has the right to correct the maintenance failure or have it corrected at the sole expense of the property owner. sitedist.eas /Nov93 PUBLIC ROADS SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Spokane County, Washington July 5, 1995 To: Todd Whipple, P.E. From: Development Engineering Services RE: Language for P.U.D. Plat Dedication & Covenants Project # P1414 1. Please incorporate the following into the plat dedication: or its successors in interest. (HOME OWNERS ASSOCU77ON) Drainage easements, as platted and shown hereon, which are for the purpose of installing, operating, and maintaining drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted to the This Plat is subject to the separate DECLARATION OF COVENANT as recorded under (date) Auditor's Document No. which by reference is made a pan hereof. The sale of Lot 8, Block 6 shall not close, nor shall a building permit for Lot 8, Block 6 be issued, until such time as McMillan Lane is extended beyond the plat boundary to either a cul- de -sac meeting Spokane County requirements or to a connection with Mission Avenue. 2. Please ensure that the temporary turnaround easement on Lot 8, Block 6 is shown on the plat. An easement for Basin P (on Tract A) should also be shown on the plat, or a blanket drainage easement should be provided over Tract A 3. Per our conversation, we have hand - lettered onto the mylars the requirement for sprinkler systems meeting the County's Interim Irrigation Standards for "208" Swales for the swales along Indiana Avenue and Mission Avenue. A copy of these Standards is included for your reference. DECLARATION OF COVENANT In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of Plat No. PE - 1414, Riverwalk First Addition (hereinafter referred to as the "Plat "), the undersigned covenants and agrees that: 1. The subdivider /sponsor will construct the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 2. A lot is served by a private road when: a. the only road frontage for the lot in die Plat is on the private road, or; b. a lot (having frontage nn more than one road (public or private) constructs an approach to the private road. Ri /Ble Walk 3. The Owners Association or its successors in interest shall maintain the private roads and associated drainage facilities in confwman kith the a rr� v�ed plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. The 6c18don shall maintain the drainage swales within and adjacent to the public rights -of -way for Indiana Avenue and Mission Avenue with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of stonnwater in the drainage swales as indicated by the approved plans. 4. The owner(s) of any lot created by the Plat or alteration thereof and served by a private road shall be responsible for maintenance of said private road, including associated drainage facilities, in conformance with approved plans on file with the County Engineer's office. 5. Maintenance financing of the a ro• fk associated drainage facilities shall be in a manner determined by the '' {(�� rnwne Owners Association or their successors in interest. 6. Should the Riuncw !J lterCBerne Owners Association be terminated for any reason, the successors in interest sh I b h n WO lot owners, or their successors in interest, who are members of the Riveruulk_Fire• i�ut" Owners Association at the time of said termination. 7. In the event such private road including associated drainage facilities is improved to Spokane County standards tier public streets, and the County is willing to accept the dedication of such road and drainage facilities, each lot owner shall execute any conveyance documents necessary to accomplish such dedication. 8. Owners of Tots within the Plat who are served by such road may sue and recover damages and attorneys' fees from any owner of any lot within the Plat which is also served who refuses to participate in the road and drainage facilities construction, financing, and maintenance. 9. WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, or maintain or otherwise service the private roads, and associated drainage facilities contained within or providing service to the property described in the Plat. By accepting this Plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued for property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind of nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road or its' associated drainage facilities. 10. Spokane County is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all private roads and /or drainage easements, for the propose of inspection and emergency naintena e o it • es, l t drainage facilities, if not properly maintained by the Rjy�r "�" =+•++ ss Ass ift ton, or their successors in interest. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect and maintain • the drainage { sot y is ?siege swales, nor does the County accept any liability for failure by the owner's Association, or their successors in interest to properly maintain such areas. 11. The lot owners within this Plat shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface path of natural or man -made drainage flow over and across their respective properties. 12. The lot owner or his representative shall inform each succeeding purchaser of all drainage easements on the property and of his responsibility for maintaining surface drainage paths and swales within said easements. �Wlk 0WA/� 13. The R iwhrlvtt i-klox+ Association, or their successors in interest, shall maintain all water quality treatment swales ( "208 swales ") and drainage ditches situated within this Plat, and any portion of a 208 swale situated in or adjacent to the public rights -of -way for Indiana Avenue and Mission Avenue adjacent to this Plat, with a permanent grout co ot ts s e i e the current approved plans on file with the County Engineer's Office. The owner's Association, or their successors in interest, may install approved shrubbery and /or trees which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the 208 swales and drainage ditcl s, : tdica e • e current approved plans on tile with the County Engineer's Office. The R ': ' -• Owner's Association shall maintain the drywells, as shown on the approved road plans, located in private drainage facilities. 14. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas, nor the responsibility for any damage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties sue to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. 21 �e4 N/fl-(K o w #e 15. Whenever the R i s Association, or their successors in interest, fail to maintain the drainage facilities in • t if • c dh a r k �I, anna a plan, a notice of such failure may be given to the Rimaaiic rt • � anion, or their successors in interest, by the County. If not corrected within the period indicated on said notice, the County has the right to correct the maintenance failure, or to have it corrected, at the expense of the klaeowner's Association, or their successors in interest. 16. Any building that is constructed on a lot in this Plat shall he set at such an elevation so as to provide positive drainage away from any drainage entry point to the building (including but not limited to a window well, a window unprotected by a window well, or a doorway). Said positive drainage shall consist of a minimum slope of 3% away from the building for a distance of at least 10 feet from the building. The lots shall be graded so that either a) all runoff is routed away from the building, and conveyed over die lot to a natural drainage swale or approved drainage facility, or b) drainage intercepted on the lot is disposed of on the lot in an approved drainage facility. The approved drainage facility shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file at the County Engineer's Office. Any revisions to the approved drainage plans must be approved by the County Engineer's Office prior to construction of said revisions. 17. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or tloodplain areas, nor the responsibility for any damage whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. 18. This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns, including the obligation to participate in die maintenance of the private road and drainage facilities as provided herein. STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY A Washington General Partnership By: HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION A Washington Corporation Its General Partner By: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss County of I certify that I know or that I have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me , and said person acknowledged that he(she) signed dhiS instrument, on oath stated that he(she) was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged It as the of HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such corporation, for the uses and purposes stated in the instrument. DATED this day of 199 . NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires By: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION A Washington Corporation Its General Partner By: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) County of ) ss I certify that I know or that 1 have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me , and said person acknowledged that he(she) signed this instrument, on oath stated that he(she) was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such corporation, for the uses and purposes stated in the instrument. DATED this day of 199_ . NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires S P O K A N t3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Thank you. MEMORANDUM TO: Division of Engineering and Roads Division of Utilities Division of Buildings Spokane County Health District Spokane County Parks Department Fire Protection District No. 1 Consolidated Irrigation District FROM: Thomas Veljic, Planner I ( DATE: June 30, 1994 C O 13 N T Y WALLIS D. HUBBARD, DIRECTOR RECEIVED JUL 0 1 x094 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGIr RECE:' .r..,) U SPOKANt: ENGINEEQ. SUBJECT: Review of REVISED Final Plat and PUD for PE-1414-81 RIVERWAY VILLA Enclosed find copies of the above referenced revised final plat. Please review and forward any comments by July 14,1994. If you have any questions you may contact Thomas Veljic at 456 -2205. sam Enclosure c: North Idaho Engineering, 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2, Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 WEST 1026 BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0240 • (509) 456 -2205 1 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer July 10, 1995 Michael Hunt, P.E. North Idaho Engineering Todd Whipple, P.E. IPEC SUBJECT: P1414 - 208 Lot Plans 1st Review Gentlemen: A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director A review of the 208 Lot Plans for this project has been accomplished. Areas of concern to us are indicated in red on the attached prints. Please make the corrections and resubmit them to this office in order that the review process may proceed. When the plans are resubmitted, please mark all changes on the revised print in color. If you have any questions about this review, please contact us at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours. Bill Johns, P. E. Acting Spokane County Engineer Edward P. Pa'rfy Jr., P.E. Plans Review Engineer encls: Lot Plans (3) ec: /project file reviewer (comments only) 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 REVIEW COMMENTS SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING & ROADS 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260 -0710 PHONE (509)456 -3600 FAX (509)324 -3478 REVIEW PROJECT ft: P1414 DATE: 10 July 95 PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk - 208 Lot Plans Lot 4, Block 3 /1. The drainage easement appears to be the exterior line around the pond floor footprint L6"t 1, Block 4 �. The distance from the Harmony Lane PL return to the easement should be indicated REVIEWER: Ed Parry Lot'2, Block 4 e /They Baring should be noted on either the 49.92' dimension or on the 12.65' dimension Note: Only the Lot Plans which have been revised need to be resubmitted (2 copies, please) G1- C40.DWG R = 755.00 L 5 +EaSI CENTER POINT INV. ELEV 202q TYPE 2 CURB INLET EDGE OF P= .•LENT — r�E ♦. f �� A S 4 0 1. 0,-C , was r � ° k `f • � ONAL ,, '-� EXPIRES RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION LOT 1 BLOCK 4 ,.15 INDIANA AVENUE 745.X / L= 37.00 R= ra8L1 L =43a3' I OOMMON AREA ti A R =755LX L. & 1 � r I I , /, r r - 5' BUILDING SETBACK O I I i,l re) L 1 4 _ 43 i _ — _ 1 I — — — , LEVEL, FLAT, POND 52.24' BOTTOM AREA 1 1 1 3' MIN. TYP. •� DRAINAGE EASEMENT SPOKANE C•OVNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH I TT 4 METAL FRAME AND i.RATE 1 G"A. Igr25,00 HnR)-ION7 1 I u - ELEV. 202 CF SET IT RICH' 16* DRAINAGE. SLOPE. AND UTILITY EASEMENT I 7/6/95 iB 101.46s. L= 40.31' R= - 155.00' POND BOTTOM ELEV = 2027.13 BERM ELEV. = 202813 16+A- 2 4.}.(4S RECEIVED JUL 10 1995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER GUTTER �— a s 4200 West Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene. Idaho 83814 SIDEWALK Rl6HT �F WAY PROPERTY LINE SCALE 1 = 20' North Idaho Engineering Phone (208) 687 -1171 Fax• (208) 864 -3507 E0 0 0 ro 0 1- (U 0 0 Al) r+ TOP OF DIK E ELEV.= EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ BACK OF SIDEWALK + 20 FT 3 DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPFCIFIED cim PLAN MINIMUM EASEMENT LIMIT GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE J TYPICAL '208' POND WIT HOU F DRAIN/VA STRUCTURE. SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) 50' MIN R/W BACK OF SIDEWALK/ EDGE OF PAVEMENT 3 MAX n 0 7 ID 1J 0 0 z 0 0 0 R = 20D0' L = 4.4G' L = 10453' SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE 'A" DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME AND GRATE STA. 10«53.58 GRATE ELEV. 202b.11 OFFSET 19 5' RIGHT \ 5A h --- - v,.=-1‘ R' A 's �, � i A21 ��� N ,,ys N \$ 7U _ R f >3 g`r' 3'ttlN TYPE ..... R i A�,S ' „.....:41,.,1,1F- DRAINAGE EASEMEN1 ■ 1 t l , ` t N 1 1 L 1 Ir IV \ ‘ 1 1 �F LEVEL, FLA f POh1GP TOM AREA lb' DRAINAGE, SLOPE. AND UTILITY EASEMENT —EDGE OF PAVEMENT RIGHT OF WAY PROPERTY LINE IOP OF DIKE ELEV.= EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ BACK OF SIDEWALK + .20 FT r 3 MAX DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN MINIMUM EASEMENT LIMIT GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCr OF ADJACENT HOUSE TYPICAL '208' POND WITHOUT DRAINAGE STRU {_TURE SECTIONAL VIEW INOT TO SCALE) 50' MIN R/W 3 MAX BACK OF SIDEWALK/ EDGE OF PAVEMENT - 0 0 LD , ✓ tJ 0 0 a • ° C • ro 4- In f SIGEHALY WEkt RAIN STA 104.7500 INV. ELEV. 2028.00 SPOKANE C.OUNTT S1ANDARV TYPE 13" PRYHE1.1 WITH 50L11) LOGKIN& LIP STA IO +5358 &RATE ELEV. 2028.11 OFFSET 11' RIC3HT f r . ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT 1 1 I 1 1 `` +v' PP QAGE SLOPE Af1I? IJTIL r EASEMENT 11 �1`7 R�. 1 5A 2 � 11140 * • f.ON4P --E1E INLVT Tr PE 2 WITH METAL vRATE TWE 2 STA.IO*8A 24 GRATE ELEV. 2021120 OFFSET 46.42' LEFT WITH tai LF. 12" G.M.P. 12% E••+RADE EDGE OF PAVEMENT 51DfHALK — � RIGHT OF HAT A . i 1 4 : iZ Ab I :5b, I I r ...--- - -- ", J 3' MIN TYP. LEVEL. FLAT, P0/11 1301 TCKd AREA PROPER T r L INE rc 1 \R 2154,86' L = 6.71' 0 0 'J ro 7 a n m 0 ID 4 0 Q. O ID � Ul (D 0 0 (D CO CO 03 r 0 0 TOP OF DIKE ELEV.= EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ BACK OF SIDEWALK + 20 FT 1 /- 3 MAX DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN MINIMUM EASEMENT LIMIT GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE 1 TYPICAL '208' POND WITHOUT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) 50' MIN tit nlr .iji A( IL R/W BACK OF SIDEWALK/ EDGE OF PAVEMENT -\ 3 MAX 1 0 z ro 0 (V 0 O a 'C z 0 0 r m x6 e 1 0 c N 0 ;) II 0 0 0 m r M m 0 �.T1 SIDEWALK UNDERDR.AIN STA. 101123 00 INV. ELEV. 2028.00 SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE B" DRYYEL.L WITH '- SOLID LOCKING LID `. 5TA. 1063.58 GRATE ELEV. 2028.11 OFFSET IT RIGHT f — ` eft I� cs I I p 17G j ` I6 DRAINAGE. SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT 1 I I ' lO 1 I CJ yAp 1C1 1 c ) 1 Pe? 1 1;1CY al 0 TO.OV' DRAINAGE EASEMENT — 10000' GONGR TE INLET Tr WITH METAL GRATE TYPE 2 STA 10.89 GRATE ELEV. 202160 OFFSET 4,7.42' LEFT WITH t43 L.F. 12' C.M.P. d !2% GRADE EDGE OF PAVEMENT — \ SIDEWALK RIGHT OF WAY 3' MIN- TYP. LEVEL, FLAT, POND BOTTOM AREA PROPERTY LINE a R = 2154,56' L = 6.T1' rY 0 N 1 O O -J 0 TOP OF DIKE ELEV = EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ BACK OF SIDEWALK + 20 FT. 3 MAX. DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN MINIMUM EASEMENT LIMIT GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT - WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE TYPICAL '208' POND WITHOUT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) 50' MIN. ul,.al, .tII,.,L: R/W BACK OF SIDEWALK/ EDGE OF PAVEMENT 3 MAX 1 0 r r - oc L i 0 <n 0 w r n 0 G '1 a W (11 • I K ul a 0 O • O 0 CD 0 r 'C 4- 4- N 0 0 0 TOP OF DIKE ELEV.= EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ BACK OF SIDEWALK + 20 FT DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN MINIMUM EASEMENT LIMIT GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE 44 -411, Al .JL.Jt i l rlr TYPICAL '208' POND WITHOUT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) 50' MIN, di th tit .111,1V- R/W 1 3 MAX BACK OF SIDEWALK/ EDGE OF PAVEMENT 4- 0 m 1] T 0 0 n 0 fD 1 0. 0. 0 0) 4- O O c 0 u = r , y m c o to 0 O to 0 R = 20.00' L = 4.44' L : 10.63' ,PQKANE cQUNtr STAr'IPARP TYPE "A" PRI WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME AND GRATE 5TA, 10f535E ■ GRATE ELEV 2026 OFFSET Iq,5' RIGHT 17 i' h .�A P t-'0% �' \� 3' MIN rYP...--* LEVEL, FLAT, POMC' BOTTQM AREA lb' DRAINAGE, SLOPE. AC ID UTILITY EASEMENT ED6E OF PAVEMENT RIGHT OF WAY rpY -IP1 I. NE 0 0 n IV UJ .P H S 0 m Tv 0 0 te r, m fi 0 U4 rD • r-� (JQ ale..�l4.ilt. aL.. 14, TOP OF DIKE ELEV = EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ BACK OF SIDEWALK + .20 FT 3 MAX. DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN MINIMUM EASEMENT LIMII GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT - WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE d1. . il��L..,li TYPICAL '208' POND WITHOUT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SECTIONAL VIEW (NOT TO SCALE) .50' MIN R/W PACK OF SIDEWALK/ EDGE OF PAVEMENT 3 MAx I Lam- Y« 0 N, O NIA ❑ 1. Lot plans are required: submitted on 10 3 v., ❑ No ❑ NIA 2. The 208 lot plans show: 208 LOT PLANS CHECKLIST NIA 0 2a. The lot nwnber, block number, subdivision name. date drawn, scale, north arrow and street name. v.. Ne 0 NIA 0 2b. Easement dimensions in relation to property lines or corners. yr ❑ No 0 NIA 2c. Location of curb, sidewalk or edge of asphalt as applicable. Yes ❑ Nu 0 NIA 0 2d. Setback requirements y. 0 No 0 NIA 0 2e. Swale floor elevation y. No 0 NIA 0 2f. Swale floor dimensions are shown in relation to property lines or corners. Yu 0 No 0 wA 0 2g. Rim elevation drywell type, frame and grate type, centerline offset and station if drywells are present. Yes 0 w 0 t/A 0 'h. Curb cut station, normal flowline invert. v„ 0 Ne 0 N,A 0 2i. Any drainage ditches, their easements, flowline grade and other required improvements. v„ 0 rw, 0 NIA 0 2j. Shows depth from the normal flowline to bottom of swale. ye. 0 No 0 NIA 0 2k. An attached cross section of the swale or ditch. Yes 0 w 0 N A 0 3. Existing easements, buildings, future set asides, and required building setback lines are shown. The section drawing shows the concrete apron. R.O.W. line. and grass sod or seeding if approved. y ,. Nn 0 NIA 0 5. Lot plans have been stamped by a professional engineer on all pages Yes 0 No 0 Na 0 (. Lot plans are of sufficient scale to maximize the lot size to the 8 1/2" x 11" paper size. (Drawings may be on plain white paper) vein N. 0 .,A 0 7. 208 lot plans were approved on NORTH IDAHO ENGINEERING, INC. 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 * Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 * Phone (208) 667 -1171 * Fax (208)664 - 3507 To: Spokane County ATTN: Ed Parry REF: 208 Lot Plans TRANSMITTAL From: John Boyer We are Transmitting: *Status* X Herewith Proposed For Information Separate Cover Preliminary As requested X Via Mail In Progress Your Files Delivery X Revised Your Submittal Personal Pickup Final Checking Fedex As -built X Approval UPS For Payment Your Use Other Partial Other The Following: Specific Items: X Drawings 2 Sets 208 Lot Plans. Calculations Report Letter Maps Check $ Plans X See at Right Please: Message: Date: 7/18/95 Job No: 4004 RECEIVED JUL 2 0 1995 GWNTy ENGINEER Call immediately All comments of review #1 208 Lot Plans have been Call after review X Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Reqd. Review /Com ment No action reqd. By: addressed. REF: Riverwalk 1st Addition NORTH IDAHO ENGINEERING, INC. 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 * Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 * Phone (208) 667 -1171 * Fax (208)664 -3507 TRANSMITTAL To: Spokane County Engineering f[GD 7(7 Job No: 4004 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 L 1 0 1995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ATTN: Ed Parry From: James O. Morris We are Transmitting: 'Status' X Herewith Proposed For Information Separate Cover Preliminary X As requested X Via Mail In Progress Your Files Delivery Revised Your Submittal Personal Pickup X Final Checking Fedex As -built X Approval UPS For Payment Your Use Other Partial Other The Following: Specific Items: Drawings 2 Sets 208 Plans. Calculations Report Letter Maps Check $ Plans X See at Right Please: Message: Call immediately Cali after review X Call, if questions Respond in writing Process your end Forward as Reqd. Review /Comment No action read. By: C PROPERTY LINE PROJECT BUUNDARY CI w GUTTER CURB SIDEWALK RIE,HT OF WAY COMMON AREA �� = Sg L I a 1 � I fi 5' EtUILDIIyG SETBACK DRAINAGE EASEMENT LEVEL, FLAT, POND 531 r 745.E L �24.33• 7 49y 2. ' 12, 16• -1 ,r s s 116.33' 16' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT v E NUF BOTTOM AREA 12.- tL1V r 3' MIN TYP. J CONCRETE INLET T'1 PE 2 WITH METAL GRATE TYPE 2 STA. 4.90.00 (7 ELEV. 2021.63 OFFSET 52' RI0H1 WITH ± 2E/ Lf. 12" G.M.P 0 12% GRAPE vl f 511DEI'ALK UNPERPRAIN / I STA 191+42.11 HARMONY 1+ I INV. ELEV. 2026.13 g 71 1 40, 1 1 0.1 W1 I 51-'01 Al 1: ∎AN1I 1 IAPIt)A1'I'/ TYPE 'A" DRYPIELL WI TN 50LID LOCKING LID STA. 19440D0 HARMON r ORATE ELEV. 2021.10' OFFSET 11' LEFT l PROPERTY LINE R = 20.00 L 2.73' �rr 44 EDGE OF PAVEMENT -" ' • • "4, IA'. • • . • 3/Sc _ estemirt vane " f5, 15 36000' , PIP/WWI • Of TAM, .1•••• r *.1 • • 4a2. SIC_NC4 CQ1NU faiatap lan. Cop as pa Cartfy Coma taztrix 1 '1451. 1 11.1 tad la Pa* Palo UPI, 35.23. Ted In favite ht. 863°W, 44.67, • *Yu d 1 Ind lee lalepavw P1. Nan, ••••■ e ... 1 •e• • c44P41te.14ut. to fined 1..4 • ••nesnow • •nen., t'—dal•. 0 01..wd St.rvr, 442014.).8. •• It 4 o ' • >1 lir '6 tit 1.'. 1.415510. 565 ant 10 71 • S85'56 SCE Ler,. otlar, a 51 t74 4' s 5 ••• V 116 • . Sat 1 4 thaw .1th a tic aaa tx441144 AlIC INC, 7317'13315 I.P.'e• Glair, 3/4 l pips, 171°I, 1.61' Sal York 614 fe; (7317) h. Fate Fro, Seel. 7,47' SO NA. fttax rrItly " 111.0E. 10.31' ,2 • 141 OS a $ j: ....k L., .- .. 1 .....""". ' 1 1 .: l•ta.i, , ' i 315 1 51 ', , . . . .. i 03+ 60 - ! Avitak 1 r -I NI f 1 5 *5* 40 111' No ,it 1 1/4 CO•NE1te reelan...5 • .C.,7, A•••• ei pn 6 .cmd S.ower '61.44-1*.0 lq. bah 0.5' ".k.. oepluelt on 5 o r g_LC111.)N (eatla,e toenn 1 4411.1a. Ax..a. CPA: LAMM, OP. GNI ...1.44 ,41:1 N40111'1, 15,36' 1..00ap hail N 0• in peace pals, S6rW„ 0.01' 5.1 Una sat Tag 57317) in IO 1......o, "I 77 70 el ■ / of , pet 14tned Snremy • 4. 1 • $ 8 0 9 0 \ ft! 1/4 C ft taithiaa x 50' 57' Geo.15. Stone taxi .1.0.1 0.7 dawn. 1 P., faiatne, t' tro. pip., 5a.41 37.84' s., 114 (A8C) N1 Se 8.0. Splk• I, '•", N79 507010:81"5 Si7?t5 , 4 :manta. I•71 • %Ord Cnifsfr._/0ffell411. • e••• ••••••••• StenV1 Cfnitrecair EMICA01 SOPA/ PORIVIt5 SEETO: 8, T.TleNs.ir H 25 MAT, RANGE 45 EAST Sr cc 'e, rel.Se4eN911:'.16 veto 1 5Ci't 9„u & i I Utf, AIM I '77:. C071 t"' (. Ow... urd re *4. 2.14 - Pram Stain] VOA •C r t. 1 WU los •ri..” • d .vki CO" ,td. Rekor r. Tr l ,io.�±fre • nn IL ' 5 /oN !? J f. A c 45EWI LF. 4Eivo O • l .vu Mfvt. M ' 0 • 5 `44e ?A / Yeieow CA' b'AS/� rW ee-A:4 ,Ad 9 r //4 ASJ4hf eO Mot //lh/6Nrs' Fo4n/n /yep Aeete.tvr oN ricF /// 6#�0•!••E CO/#.ury EN4/NefRf OFF /C£. f ICiI) OP RECORDED r•C9UC _' •�_, it Ser 18 4 19111 1 01 t G`Y ". •. ,. ,w Ct/Yi r Id i • /0 aaD h 2 L c ! # R L ESCRIPT1•7Ia .. /?r,• -:., 0/ 1or' :,; Of te ••• f /:f %t1' :v Tr Ir• . -ice ♦e - r P. /1 •4'4r * Wee., ,n 5'rn/rOnl Ceunty, ;test c/4.1/0shi.f9/'On enure /e0r0 /o- /9, , ,leper eh oar de fo How,r COrN en' er. - ,c o Cor./e• of Sec/ton a rzsm rJ4ga'NM. Thrr .1. 0•'00 O /en, she A✓erf lee' e ofSO,d :re ef too e Q d # - iOn ..^ 4 959.00 f001A, rise/lee 4"89'S9' // "E o ce fonce 00.00 a.•/ • = I -..• • • • ••/ ir9.n�.,: • / r #hi■ desCr. ,Cf,O•. :. f.d , e •, • f.r..: > /i•_ 6 1 .:- cf F ' - ^.00. FArnre eon en so.,Y= te9 ^ 459'// "C o .'•- f ea% rhenoe N (Pl00'49•'0 o c/•sfo. a= 0.06 f•-et Thr,-ce I, •9:)•S•. // °W O air Armee 70.60 foe/ to ,fie E'o.r/ //r!t of eorker Road. Thenee 50 ° 00'49 "W i /•C bi►.rf /. /ie .nf rn•d FgI.Cer mart Cn S0.e o ,eee/ /» iVe• • • ,• . i lf/: /I • l.v •CM K MILbt. f► .1 1V.N • .' tut. as ■•01. Y. G Ib COM•0�16 .•1.. 1t. O, 1r. w UE •ICO QS O t .1 r"[ /74 $4 �• c_,.__. M 1 EUGFNE H. WELBORN PPWISS1OhAL IANff SUPVETOR E. 7012 SECOND AVE. SPOKANE. WASH 9f,206 SURVEYORS CERTIi1.:ATE 3 1 /1/ ,:j5'- I WAG,. .• N. /ALE £ LP.S at r 7 0 A 4. ■% NDIANA 4VENUE SVY'SW PARCEL "13' (1'01,M ) F ,:f Piz Si 4 5 W . .44t.-eg 1 13 Aiii112"." I 84".25 :-.re.4." Cg Lai g , A.-144. Ws 00 iht ,..N11 pep. Nor , 1/4 • It 1.4,71,41 .3-.1: Z. . ...1 owler A .1 4 114 44444 Atoll . N. m ohm , a -• ■•••••• v - A E1/4 r "' Rws Opt wqmki4tanI Irson 1J L S Sae. Oar.• 73. 7 APJP1/41111)10 MIMIC/at ';` rSt — /It-a OA Kie/atu Mail' rt. 1 • Lc Jr it; 9 jri ocaA_Se.crir. 19e- B und lay :14r vsy: erN. w= SEC 8,7Z5N, R45E, 111 /MSC? M/St4 14004 Ebtr 4. AVENUE LiVailosiirsam lir — 6. • zei.0•Itt et. •110.0•1 00,0 •• • an 0.40 • 0."' 0 01. Cor••••041 0.1 To.. 40,0•001“n00 ,0 8 40•••• •Ce.4'0.001 .071 A, S&P - • • OAK% "(LA INC Astrifilas--- . O • • "Ns COUNTY OF SPOI(A/VE, WASH. ADAMS ENGINEERING CMI tnipes...L 1. land Su"ry44 [409 ..siu• Ave. 4-144q IS SPOnANL, WAFH 99:4= eP6/2' X.5 SC..ALE: i' • • � SCALE IN FEET 1 6- I I � ti - ;4 1! LIr:� 6:CTi 46 FEC RO6 11006C1055 .1.1013-'2•31'e r • r riY_EECTIO: ex:6TKe 04165 Ca A6 PER ROb..ECOSO30E5 RECORD OF SURVEY A PCRT:Oti OF T• SC.triALEST ON'e- GE:LQ'ER OF SEC: e TOJ:8+41.. 7S NORTH RAE 43 EAS OF THE a:-LA.1ETTE MERV . EPG+<..•.SE CC? 1'r, ui8SLING7C\ $PCKA E RIVER LEGEND O 5.; 5:6 ' 18 Reo4r Wye Cu p4•1 cap • va rue* P-6 Ib14'J O Posed era's e•. V. • x • etro•r.• post f•on r•card or .:.vs} 1•.O 40 . 17octino-t 16:6503035 4 a, w.eord net ROa .6301030'35 (L] Fay.p SURVEY NOTES 1 .05 6.:RlE• '•C 9;05 03055 `ilir)ey �y2 AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE F a•) fP • •(-7 • 4" V 1 at _ _ _ _ rat 41 plea_ _ 11 tree •404d14 at L711. a Cvin • a..cc .te1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4f1Cegtt17 4 r••4t.: c• t•• o• Stet - ce 71 Noe , Renee 48 8I• 0t W - ,114 - :•a r•aW.-.• Scc..••• Ccalny. IL•.•1••e1• O•.e•0 0 •. Jm'o./ Co —at At its t:s.l era -0 4'te co-re. of Sec.. 6 'o.rrc :5 9 .1 9 1: Ro s 1 5 81.1. three $G v 0675'03' E•St cr we s ett Ole o• we 60.V-west c t N o bettor t • 0 114ro• at 4•000 flat !hams ps- tro'tu4• to •1'0 .•et 1We tye911, M7411- Ian • O It4rCe or 8066 ran 1* •• Emit 'IQ trot of 601,•• Rose W 74 E:,t: PJ T.' o• :5Efa k's snares \ova 6614,1• Et at 1-0 .e • .ua. sra• a Re0Cra c' a•vey 4..0.10•• PCas eat k0608060 • dIst•rce d 30000 lam Owe. ilo•t• 3 1•.l • c•:. .• d w• • a .4490• or •34,35 te:i. tr_s ra ia.v 461•3' t:Nst. • O*liec• o• 34134 rasa w.-o. b^ .• 3I 43 - 8.151 • d-.ta•c• or :3000 feet, ve c• \c• V 63 03 • seas, • 0.089c. or 30000 I••1 to W E•.t •. o- .- et..a 04 fl•�a- Ra•d: twee %a•sr• 00'336) .e.t IC .•'d • 2� - - • a - .tot.. M :0000 fen W ere - Rs! °0 \' 0L M. el \\y.b Con•'reo :'t •Pt. EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES UTILIZED T.:000 r Sets•, iroactc. to . w • a : •.d 0RIE-4 041• Calaesa• • 9:•10 V•••••• u•. .1 ':•a I'rr•• ctfw •eC••0•ee 1'0,0100 u•. •e.0 0 ••v SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE - •C cc. -Key ••e.•.r:s • .J•1 -40e Cy d'•Kt.c. M COIO••■C• u''V '19* .J.•y •!t rt •e •Ct Al 14.0 •■0.!11 C 190 .10.c. Of 111•1 Y•' r YO •t.■Ci'•t•1 e.ot • •o+. rat. • 10 /0fSI Scott L Y•'e.t'N Profeas'or4+ LAN. A•vyer timPe•+eto• Rae tt•••o• \O a 814111. 1.3AS6 AND 1SSOCIATL. 13l' $0K111 920 1r8311L.CTO\ 31.Rt: i SPOKANE. Wa.rU8%CTO5 95.01 C5C9) 527 -0697 PROJECT N RPLX0017 5--EE' O. I t••VS TO: Spokane County Engineers 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 ATTENTION: Ed Parry Description Xerox Prints fl Original Drawing 1 1 Work Authorization No. Copies 1 Purpose 1 X J Information j A. '�. ACCE�o. .r__ Written Approval Remarks Signed • , cc: Verne Jacobse in INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY ENGINEER 707 W. 7th Avenue. Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -6844 El Copy of Letter Ei Contract Documents Report fl Review & Comments LI Signature & Return DATE July 11, 1997 I.P.E. PROJECT #: 96106 PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk 1st Addition 0 Per Your Request �EIVED 1 1 1997 Description Daily Inspection Report #4 covering the period 7 -9 -97. n T ". .fT Pk15 t INLAND I a zr Date Arrival Time Weather Client Subcontractor - — • 9'c • E cD pe4f - 00(.21 Gc General Contractor IPE Field Representative Manpower & Equipment Used Comments: York Completed Apparently e r>'t f-- jar 1,1E2) per Specifications Problems and their Solutions) ( e- a-5ue_ /p PPo ! 1 I -T I ?C- r L - lam J 7 a�11 E`er . 1 r a e -► CO T1 ' �T 1 O n! `t r t c _t? arm )rte as ALL u0. IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer aid /or IPE project manager. �, 11 Date • w. L) L ,'PE C NSTRUCTION ENGINEER Corresponding Deficiency Report No Inspector's Daily Report No.: 4 IPE Project No,: 9 (atOco 01 Page No. c 1 a DAILY FIELD REPORT Local Represe tative/ phone number Verve JA-c-0856,4 q 7 ( — ( , 7 Site Representative/ pine number I PE Project Manager/ phone number �f� r1r� ri.ii4lQF•L 6e (T-6. i 1 =L CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE �(1 u IPE PROJECT MANAGER Date Date — INLAND MN PACIFIC ENGINEERING –9 _ 7 Arrival Time Weather 9 Client Local Representative) phone number ,�/GZIrv' — G OF V I- J .ias ' I 7 f - f General Contractor - Site Represer p one number Subcontractor IPE Field Representative Comments: (Work Completed Apparently per Specifications Problems and their Solutions) r r Manpower & Equipment Used N. ON! d /4,:) A I P.- > - u r L7 1' i mss__ IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE / ')/' NSTRUCTION ENGINEER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: Inspector's Daily Report No.: IPE Project No.: Page No. IPE Project Manager/ phone number !0 I p - r - I . iJ "7 I E DAILY FIELD REPOR1 IPE PROJECT MANAGER -s - 6.r 4-6 vie " 14 1 .. a _ ■ a ale r Ny • I f It PI CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer a dior IPE project manager. Date Date INLAND MI PACIFIC ENGINEERING Date Arrival Time Weather Client P — 61C General Corn ctor Subcontractor 9 IPE Field Representative 14 067 Manpower & Equipment Used !•1QnI€ Comments: Vork Completed Apparently 0 er Specifications Problems and their Solutions) I 5 c.7 11 i0, • • IPE FIELD REP J PE INSTRUCTION ENGINEER Corresponding Deficiency Report No Inspector's Daily Report No.: 4- IPE Project No.: DAILY FIELD REPORT Page No, 9c rcc of Local Re rese!ltativel phone n tuber Site RepresenteUverphone number IPE Project Manager! phone number fl n t,t t r 4 f- t. 5-8 - 66' - - rr) Fa- r►� (? 1� r n .! to E- �'� ► _ice r) e 1 ITr E ' c �i !0 0-0 ki - Ft r..1 ? D. 11 IPE PROJECT MANAGER CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer i d/or IPE project manager. Date Date TO: Spokane County Engineers 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 ATTENTION: Ed Parry Description No. Copies 1 Purpose Information Ei Review & Comments 0 Per Your Request 0 Written Approval = Signature & Return Remarks Signed CC: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue. Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -6844 fl Xerox Prints 0 Copy of Letter Q Original Drawing 1 1 Contract Documents [ 1 Work Authorization 1 X 1 Report Verne Jacobsen DATE: July 23, 1997 I.P.E. PROJECT #: 96106 PROJECT NAME Riverwalk 1st Addition 1 Description Daily Inspection Reports E5 through #7 covering the period 7 -2 -97 through 7 -7 -97. O D'•TW:SMT PMS Client 7 INLAND MN PACIFIC ENGINEERING Date �(Z /_- Arrival Time I :00- Weather Genera( Contractor Sub ontractor e /► Leo* a e>r,1c zflz. ` rn - L„. IPE Field Representative Manpower & Equipment Used . G • - per Specifications Problems and their Solutions) p ∎A c, V i s-A , IP z ttilt�� C.� e - Corresponding Deficiency Report No �— Inspector's Daily Report No.: IPE Project No.: age No. e - epresen 1_1?f4roject of - DAILY FIELD REPOR1 5 Local Representative) phone number v p one num M ager) phone number Comments: /� - (Work Completed Apparently S ■ 01..) < - 17�v+1r� ;Xuc `' S i lart.o S Lam! ta.J C PE i? 11}, 1 ' �, ��� > T ► . Lam- � .0 K - rr ) - r - 7 h c 507,413 'kr4-X )'.J[fq t 1 LJ f)Ue- '1i T t3`1 irk L S. v,1t f ►c./. I , Sri . zbl 2-0 2evuovta eiu R O r rrl \J l : s"r-D /6¢441/01_. ;cros L;o,tit Pr t- zt A- -17A n.>',' ,4✓ rM}c4/_, (2,014 p►^r<._-rh,2_, t-ipt7j c P Z r I ►, D 41) let CV Pf7z P 1 /.J 72 t7 r-}T• ew- -3 j t /..j t EY1k_ I7c't`1 i+ i : 7 04:),A LI) L-& a-rt d- IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer anal /or IPE project manager. Date R`[JCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT MANAGER Date June 6, 1997 Mr. Verne Jacobsen Dean Housley Company 16720 N.E. 116 Street Redmond, Washington 98052 Re: Riverwalk 1s Addition - Construction Deficiency List Public Improvements Dear Verne: This letter transmits a list of construction items for the above referenced residential development that are currently in non- conformance with the approved projects plans and specifications and applicable Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. These items must be corrected prior to finalization of project record drawings, and prior to calling for final inspection and acceptance of the construction by the County Engineer's office as well as any bond reductions. This letter is based on items observed during a site visit on June 3, 1997 and is limited to areas of the improvements whose adequacy could be visually determined at the time of our visit. This list of observed deficiencies in project construction is intended to serve as input to help you achieve project acceptance by Spokane County. The absence of constructed items from this list in no way implies that any unlisted item(s) have been approved or are approvable under current County Standards. By copy of this letter, we are notifying the County Engineer's staff that we have requested compliance on the issues listed below. Please contact us when the above deficiencies have been corrected, so that we can proceed with the project certification and acceptance by Spokane County in a timely manner. General Deficiencies 1) Sweep and clean all sidewalks, curb and gutter, and streets of all debris and excess sand and gravel. 2) Post construction bond for amount of $1,950.00 per Ed Parry letter. Re: Red paver brick instead of concrete brick used for vertical adjustment. 3) Confirm acceptance of retaining wall on the - sidewalk, north side of Indiana, approximate station 4 +00. Storm Drainage 1) Sod and irrigate pond in Tract "C", Riverwalk 2 ntl Addition, due to acceptance of public drainage. Riverwalk 1 Page 2 Pavement 1) Compact base course and pave asphalt adjacent to concrete cross gutter at Indiana and McMillan Lane. Sidewalk 1) Remove and replace approximately 4 panels of sidewalk on the north side of Indiana west of H.C. ramp at approximate station 5 +00. Sidewalk has settled and created a lip between the sidewalk and the curb. 2) Remove and replace 2 panels of sidewalk around the U.S. West manhole due to settlement, and lip between the curb and sidewalk. Approximate Indiana station 4 +20, left. 3) Remove and replace 1 panel of sidewalk, approximate Indiana station 3 +50, right. Sidewalk has crack. 4) Patch and grout around the H.C. ramp at the west side of Indiana and McMillan Lane. Curb and Gutter 1) Remove and replace broken curb and gutter on Indiana, approximate station 2 +60, right. 2) Remove and replace broken curb and gutter on Indiana, approximate station 4 +40, right. 3) Remove and replace broken curb and gutter at the west curb retum on Indiana and Harmony. 4) Remove and replace curb return at the west intersection of Harmony Lane and Mission Avenue. If you have any questions or would like to schedule inspections and testing of any concrete pours, please give me a call. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. Bruce A. Howard Principal cc: Spokane County Engineers Office - 4i3 Date 'r. Arrival Time Weather Client 7 INLAND MN PACIFIC ENGINEERING 1-Lt4 t lreY. General Contractor 4-, C-. Subcontractor IPE Fie�epr sentative Manpower & Equipment Used 1,0P-A , uD, LW-LW— Comments: 'Mork Completed Apparently er Specifications Problems and their Solutions) r 4 A ap .() ! L,' 1 we ► s tr . �t �wc S c�.tr `1 4 T eve i_c 4S Cs FEZ t ,.J 77-hr ,1/4.1cycq.j , Luc. nr IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer and /or IPE project manager. Date C_ (i 1 TIZUCTION ENGINEER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: Inspector's Daily Report No.: IPE Project No.: Page No. c iL1' 1 OC.p Of 1 Local Representative/ phone number ff. Site Repre entative/ phone number LL �rr - c-,Ia IPE Project Manager! phone number t4 i ? F?A) 1Tzr L -O/ (W-AD t u'- Ic -tLSG, f m-n F4 Pt:t4 - 1 .- HT 4117 +.o is P&r2. ki- i L Ct ? ( Z ' x /A"( w1 ge11:. fit" (:!.!� r , S ' E % o 244.4el - > Duty - ice 71.4- 5 �r� '— .trc.X.• e i CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE DAILY FIELD REPORT . 1, IPE PROJECT MANAGER Date 11 11 11 INLAND PACIFIC MN ENGINEERING Date -41 Arrival Time Weather Client Genera on trac .or , r.. C 1Sc-r t . Subcontractor IPE Field Re rep sentative Manpower & Equipment Used Comments: Nork Completed Apparently /(.DC l �� J D 'C"` S/ f per Specifications Problems and their Solutions) L • 'C f 1 / t4-I> r .;Fo. C4 . c ,Z. m IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE i' V-tL? lA) =A i 771 2- ?::› 71F:7--1 TRUCTION ENGINEER Corresponding Deficiency Report No � ` tT Inspector's Daily Report No.: 1 Date IPE Project No.: age No. �1C i CC" of ■ zr Local Representative/ phone number 1�.► c£ Site Representative /pone number IP Manager/ phone number r, �c -IL�T rt�1 21� �rtcz=" a - 7r62-o -6 4 DAILY FIELD REPORT [bC ,K-C -Cs' L 0,4 tom-( s i✓ n ref . T? i� i ,� r✓v,z �-� Hz r..L -11S 7■C.- t-- _d o S e_e-PC viz". n CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construcT'on engineer and /or IPE project manager. IPE PROJECT MANAGER Date IFNI INLAND PACIFIC Mil ENGINEERING Date - 41-ilq- IPE Project No. "Vu Comments: (Work Completed Apparently per Specifications Problems and their Solutions) 'S1 D a #rf Non - Conforming Items: (Protect or Standard Specification - - Observed Construction Is In Non - Compliance with) IPE Feild Rep IPE CE Inspector's Daily Report No.: Page No. IPE PM DAILY FIELD REPORT of Z PA-rt.-0 — • P r 4 ' r - c - f 1 L z c e - C _— t t ' P t - , Z ` t ( r i c w i /7 Contractor's Rep INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPA 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -684 TO: Spokane County Engineers 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 ATTENTION: Ed Parry Description Xerox Prints Original Drawing Q Work Authorization No. Copies 1 Purpose Written Approval Remarks Signed cc: Information s t ton Development I rr O Review & Comments O Signature & Return DATE: I.P.E. PROJECT #• PROJECT NAME June 6, 1997 96106 Riverwalk 1st Construction Inspection P1 Copy of Letter 0 Contract Documents O Report Description Daily Inspection Report i#3 dated 5- 28 -97. Per Your Request DITRNSM..PM5 aN INLAND m pl PACIFIC ENGINEERING Date s k • Arrival Time Lr•Db — Weather C LaA0 — Cmot, Client • paw Genera Contractor k .C. eron isrw cr,c •. Subcontractor w11`111��. IPE Field Representative . Manpower & Equipment Used [v - L441 C 7 1 r Comments: "cork Completed Apparently Specifications Problems and their Solutions) is do ic- twt'tr Y-4 Lame- A'I -J !`p arr /,4i40sa1 4 U, -CU- A'S ,1fGlzvX /rvinR -'t An MP ett.an7 • Ps,./1 Virg A o 1 Stns 7n o755 -Me iJ, 7Hg In /snrr_Lrnr>» l o f S D,S 7>C- 7 /prrrtiM • l%b J A-0414 V rft, t,oC rtici.Ji "gf s1it5 Eoc -t-OD rarr++ A tnrh -t rRr?7ha/ o Thou gt. 1». a TL),r_f t- . vk L' Fli5z •Co tirP/L�ifl . / -rte Sr 5u&606 /417 ao1TN 4 1- 11 rz-t t . 1 r> s 1(- 4vArrest - , t 47-1 3 - ra ; t.ea'_ IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE constriction engineer andlbr IPE project manager. Date I� CONStRUCTION ENGINEER V I SL..c-cc 03S er --Vec Corresponding Deficiency Report No Inspector's Daily Report No.: IPE Project No.: Page No. 7Le ID Ct_ of Z DAILY FIELD REPORT 3 Local Representative/ phone number VtDre_Q TT, 7A-Gara .. 92i - lu to Site Representative/ phone number 50,-14C IPE Project Manager/ phone number yD L.f bC Sjr kDtz aL au :Thy X / TJ.0 rtz-64 'f AViraD &Di7i?1 t., u)flFf r1172111Dn.44L TLDLL /x./&'t c' ' CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE IPE PROJECT MANAGER Date S IMI INLAND op T1 a PACIFIC ENGINEERING Date l e (q7 IPE Project No. (06p Comments: riPD ITIO !F( \(1A -Te2 -. owl= ern -mJ ri4'1 i1Lto - a Ms /,ti (Work Completed Apparently ,1 per Specifications Problems 5oij p4.,4m„(C�. LA it?? 'b. 65 J JDfl-VS, hie" dee° and their Solutions) boe 7 Y- hurTF7z_ A 1 Tlox /r.,_ Cue-R, " SiD� �o,rz r`�TT t*kft . LA" xL " colt r1sS1( ors ,ki n usU a/ f7hs X burry 70-the. Ia 77#E - rfe� X hun ,:oni -'s rh?j /D 71? n ED 7b Vim,k/ pgofl ? D -vti3O 771 .n JP bt) /iCnce nh. /c-r Inch 71 ?I-PR ✓W et"' S, .61 Prep-4r Cam. LAE0 G $:GO 19 ` tag St ✓jp mac- 97-a2A-e,rra% vl n e p 6 1 ha rr6. ✓1i./D • .n tAR'LI! Q«Ce c n I=1S rtnJCak /OFT/) pa % ea ' • an -pa ( > DY /n4c,fl'r 2- Fi?,1_'l,S) 6P DS el) n+,er .tJ' orrSe7 It 1 //4CC-tsTn L7f ,iv e v O /AG. Lrf7 /De- ,G /e,, e or a . 'u&I -It,S r t rzlr t uJ > r< r 002.( I s7, Ih f o 5 l t� wa1Z4207 r>/• lac /f ( � n $ r2r A-r n I nc ) RmA . 0,1,A c-' rg €,>etS Oct e( 7etct..rrrol/ 7 774 cc1 CT 7aLpjarnott cst .511;V: .zc.. e . 2irAPJ . 0-4A-14 ` 4 r •a • Co • ii/._/rt'r "77 Wan /J - re=. 7C SUMTDUC.In> A-r IPE Feild Rep IPE CE Inspector's Daily Report No.: 3 Page No. of Z oNIZ4p pt vfl9 Z z)i. t oA-r_e _ c Cu e.P rY l 1 51 :. C f D DAILY FIELD REPORT A [- feree'• DerC, IPE PM Contractor's Rep INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Mr. Verne Jacobsen Z J J t, " Dean Housley Company 16720 N.E. 116 Street Redmond, Washington 98052 June 6, 1997 Dear Verne: General Deficiencies Storm Drainage Re: Riverwalk le Addition - Construction Deficiency List Public Improvements This letter transmits a list of construction items for the above referenced residential development that are currently in non - conformance with the approved projects plans an specifications and applicable Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction.. /J-A Ai 6 tiG These items must be corrected prior to finalization of project record drawings, and prior to calling for final inspection and acceptance of the construction by the County Engineer's office a as well as any bond reductions. This letter is based on items observed during a site visit on June 3, 1997 and is limited to areas of the improvements whose adequacy could be visually determined at the time of our visit. This list of observed deficiencies in project construction is intended to serve as input to help you achieve project acceptance by Spokane County. The absence of constructed items from this list in no way implies that any unlisted item(s) have been approved or are approvabte under current County Standards. By copy of this letter, we are notifying the County Engineer's staff that we have requested compliance on the issues listed below. Please contact us when the above deficiencies have been corrected, so that we can proceed with the project certification and acceptance by Spokane County in a timely manner. 1) Sweep and clean all sidewalks, curb and gutter, and streets of all debris and excess sand and gravel. 2) Post construction bond for amount of 51,950.00 per Ed Parry letter. Re: Red paver brick instead of concrete brick used for vertical adjustment. 3) Confirm acceptance of retaining wall on the sidewalk, north side of Indiana, approximate station 4 +00. 1) Sod and irrigate pond in Tract "C ", Riverwalk 2n Addition, due to acceptance of public drainage. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 456 -6940 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 -765 -7784 • FAX: 208 -769 -7277 {Le Lett c kL- - 5 � 1L i5 5 fsri WS 33LuLhS Riverwalk 1" Page 2 Pavement 1) Compact base course and pave asphalt adjacent to concrete cross gutter at Indiana and McMillan Lane. Sidewalk 1) Remove and replace approximately 4 panels of sidewalk on the north side of Indiana west of H.C. ramp at approximate station 5 +00. Sidewalk has settled and created a lip between the sidewalk and the curb. 2) Remove and replace 2 panels of sidewalk around the U.S. West manhole due to settlement, and lip between the curb and sidewalk. Approximate Indiana station 4 +20, left. 3) Remove and replace 1 panel of sidewalk, approximate Indiana station 3 +50, right. Sidewalk has crack. 4) Patch and grout around the H.C. ramp at the west side of Indiana and McMillan Lane. Curb and Gutter 1) Remove and replace broken curb and gutter on Indiana, approximate station 2 +60, right. 2) Remove and replace broken curb and gutter on Indiana, approximate station 4 +40, right. 3) Remove and replace broken curb and gutter at the west curb return on Indiana and Harmony. 4) Remove and replace curb return at the west intersection of Harmony Lane and Mission Avenue. If you have any questions or would like to schedule inspections and testing of any concrete pours, please give me a call. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. eiLeit, Bruce A. Howard Principal cc: Spokane County Engineers Office IV{OI...Y to 7 sr, �. vat write. AVP / .. TTh Ph/as o. or P C. Z. DL.,r - re? ra- crng.-I � . - Z1 2.t71.[EiS 4enacu> •S, c P .t.IN . r 1 f: 1'H ELL- tr tor D I./ rosr — tiaccO ati/ C t r cioe 7/hzcEL-, v -ro ✓cr r c,fLtr L 'riEo Lad 4.45 S. S ln?' Snfq Jusr forlfof - E. c /tfi Flo • - La.) l < 7 - E7t7 Firtr 4 44 r R fa– e_44 e5 _Ln /r•bw,. ' -1. °LS r r I De ar G �TLOUT h �{�rl e`f, r' fb!ID l'� i ..ten, zle_ LLfL', c rrzt ai d , °.rAss fo.J. Post -i• Fax Note 7671 Date/hi I +ot • 3 pages To 8 r te , 1'^/ e , From t . CoJDept. .l. . n T Co Cc. (r PhonefzCR) 7 _ 3909 t �0 Pnonef el ii (571) , �,fo Fax rr 2 3 7 ) y - 1 Fax a .-* re/9 Riverwalk 1st From: Parry, Ed To: 'Todd Whipple, P.E.' Cc: 'Mark Hancock' Subject: Riverwalk 1st Date: Friday, May 23, 1997 13:05:27 I was out to Riverwalk 1st this morning to look at the stuff in Janelle's letter from 22 May 97. This letter contained the items that you said you would provide in our 12 May phone conversation. 1. Pond A. What's been done so far (sidesiope repairs in the lower part of the swale around the drywell) appears reasonable. the disturbed areas all need to have established vegetation. There is still some work to be done at the back of the curb inlets where the old riprap was removed, and to ensure that the tops of the check dam elevations are all 6" above the upstream swale floors 2. Pond F: So far, so good. The disturbed areas need to have the vegetation re- established. Have the elevations between the edge of pavement, CB rim, and floor been verified for conformance? 3. Pond B: A nice - looking fir, around the drywell. The sod that installed is dead, or nearly so. 4. Pond C: Have the elevations between the edge of pavement, CB rim, and floor been'verified for conformance? Post - it` Fax Note 7671 Post -it Fax Note 7671 Date / �7 '_ I, ages. 1i L From e40 kL To VGV A�- �acrb, CoJDept Co. 1 T L Phone 1 Ct l (oI O Peones 456 —(40 L K ' I Fax $ g Lr1 A-9, r 4— / T Fax q 49 IO " FAX COVER$HEET SPOKANE COUNTY - P,NCINEERF tad FLOOR FAX (5W) 3Z4-7655 PHONE 9 (509)324-79B 1026 W. BROADWAY SPOKANE, WA 99260 PHONE 9009)W-36w DATE: 23 Miv 97 TO: COMPANY: CITY/STATE: To: COMPANY: CITY/STATE: VL L .JC•nsJ VLLJC•-• L -4+L L JCL- Lsir Todd Whipple, P.E. IPE Mark Hancock Dean Housley Co. FAX #: 458 -6844 FAX N: 206/869 -6620 NUMBER OF PACES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): A Z' FROM: 5d Parry. P.E. .(Plans Review, :257) SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk 1st lelsjorItem; of Work Remaining r. u: Todd/Mark: Mark's letter of 22 May 97 indicated that a Final Inspection has been scheduled for 28 May 97. Was it intended for the County to attend that also? These arc the major items that I can think of off the top of my head. More items may be turned up as the result of a Final Inspection by the County. I mentioned must of these to Brian Howley when ha called me yesterday. P1414 - River: calk 1st (I through 8 for certain will need to be completed prior to acceptance of Indiana) 1. Mitigation payment for out -of -spec materials (Clay paver brick used to adjust CB rim at 11 +24 LT): Need ,-payment of 51950 fmm Developer's side of tine project in lieu of rework 2. Irrigation system Record Drawings: Still need 3. Sidewalk repair on North side of Indiana: Replace about a duren panels between the radius point of the Keystone wall and the sidewalk ramp at the westerly side of Harmony /Indiana (damage by phone co., settling) 4. Sidewalk repair on South side of Indiana: About 2 or 3 panels to replace (cracked or settling) 5. Establish vegetation in disturbed areas of wales A, B, F 6. Fix cruse- gutter, curb returns. and sidewalk at Indiana/McMillan (failed Bow test, concrete is cracking) 7. 'Verify e/p, rim and flour elevations in Swale F 8. Bring IA invoices up to date, not just those over 30 days .1 9. Verify rework of Minion Avenue sidewalk Raverwatk Major work items - Indiana Avenue Page 2 These are some Items 1 noticed when I drove through the she this morning: P1414A - Riverwalk 2nd 1. Establish vegetation in awake receiving runoff from Indiana 2. Irrigation system Record Drawings: Still need 3. Remove "eyebrow" temporary turnaround at Indiana/Snake River Lane. Thu was supposed to happen when Indiana was extended - please refer to the Design Deviation for the Snake River entry/temporary turnaround 4. Check/replace sidewaf dcurb: need to field check 5. Bring L invoices up to date, not just those over 30 days P141413 - Riverwalk 3rd 1. Complete work in swain receiving runoff from Indiana 2. Irrigation system Record Drawings: Still need 3. Bring all Invoices up to date, not just those aver 30 days TOTAL P.02 ATTENTION: Fp( ferry Description fl Xerox Prints [l Original Drawing Q Work. Authorization No. Copies Purpose Information Q Written Approval Remarks cc: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPA c t;iar LiiiiINEER 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -6844 0 //:: - ,J rot Signed• Description Review & Comments 0 Signature & Return I rZ RFCE!VED MAY 2 n '99 +7 DATE: � /�D 47 I.P.E. PROJECT #• q& Mc; PROJECT NAME A 00 nu.k / 51- O Copy of Letter Contract Documents El El Report /9414 w,' L m5- /.ire_ ' - frce h Dieefrimm cr7 EJ Per Your Request a O.,/ _a // 4d 4— i 1 /J d e4 - 44 i1.( 71/Q /YtPI s6/:.41,,I ∎ D \TRNSMT.PM 05/01/97 15:01 FAX 206 869 6620 DEAN -DEILY CO. May 1, 1997 TO: Ed Parry & Todd Whipple FROM: Mark Hancock RE: Riverwalk Punchlist Progress An update on Riverwalk work, and request for help: 1) KC Construction was working at the site today on the punchlist items, and they are already running out of things to do. 2) We need your help as follows: Ed - 1) Please review the questions in my memos last week, and let us know what you've been able to find out. 2) KC has told us that the pavers used for structure supports are lA ,yU raw _ate not clay tiles but brick pavers, which Mike Klika says are approved M a 4 I for use in Spokane County and are used all over. Please confirm. Q1 Todd - 1) Verne and KC need d regarding pond slopes. Since you've surveyed them, which ones do you require us to change, and how? (slope changes can impact volume) 2) Janelle visited the site today, and returned with additional questions from Verne and KC. Please review them with her ASAP and get the answers back to Verne. 3) Your intentions regarding "grout testing" are not clear to me. In the meeting at the County, I understood you to say that you were going to remove grout to inspect underneath for gaps and /or unapproved materials. In your 4/17 memo, it sounds like you simply are going to look for completed grouting. If your intentions are the former (looking underneath the grout), it would make more sense to do that "destructive" testing now - please advise. Thanks for your help, Szync- cc: Veme Jacobsen Ed Dean FAX MEMO ij 0O1 04/25/97 12:01 FAX 206 869 6620 DEAN -DETLY CO. April 25, 1997 TO: Mike Klika Verne Jacobsen FROM: Mark Hancock RE: Riverwalk Corrective Items FONDS MEMORANDUM CC:, Ed Parry Todd Whipple Ed Dean Per our meeting at the site Tuesday, there are a number of general items that you need to make sure have been addressed prior to the IPE and County inspections at Riverwalk. These include: ALL CATCH BASINS/DRYWELLS/INLETS (the County and 1PE will pull the lid off every structure, and inspect around the outside of every one as well) 1) No clay brick (including the catch basin across from pond A) 2) All structures grouted inside and outside 3) No gaps between rings, boxes, etc. 4) Alignment of lids /rings/boxes to be correct 5) Not too many rings in drywells (max. 30" total stack, bottom to top of rim) 6) Grouting around pipes that go in/out of boxes 7) Rim of inlets in ponds to be 6" (8" max.) above pond bottom, and 4" below level of adjacent street 8) (repair ponds/swales/etc. after corrective work) 1) Restore damaged ones, and seed/sod/irrigate last ones where possible 2) Side slopes to be 3:1 (or very close to that - any that are not and can't be for some reason will need to be reviewed by IPE/County on an individual basis) (also helps to look at NIE drawings) 3) Back of Type 2 inlets under sidewalks - no rocks, and no exposed corners 4) Swales are missing on Baldwin and McMillan (make proposal to IPE/Co.) 5) Irrigation asbuilts for 1st/2nd and 3rd Additions If any of the above items cannot be done as required by Code and the drawings, or you have a good reason to do things differently, please contact Todd Whipple and Ed Parry. I@joo JUL -21 -1995 11 :19 INLAND PACIFIC ENG INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA (509)458 -8840 Fax: 1509)458 -8844 TO: Spokane County - VIA FAX 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 ATTENTION: Terry Lightfoot Description: o Blueline Prints 0 Copy of Letter 0 Original Documents o Original Drawing 0 Contract Documents 0 o Work Authorization o Report o No. Copies Description 1 Copy 1 Copy Purpose o Information o Review & Comments o o Written Approval o Signature & Return o Remarks Terry: Enclosed as noted above are copies from two different plans. The first is the new PUD site plan and second a copy of the Harmony Road intx. from the approved street plans. Please be aware that North Idaho Engineers (NIE), the design firm, has not revised the ' Aft County file mylars to represent that the leg to the north is not to be constructed as it no Itf' ��/ longer works with the PUD site plan. Therefore, if you make a site visit, please be aware fir`" of this. 1 am anticpating that NIE will be getting over to the County within the next week or so to revise the mylars on file. If you have previously visited the site in order to clarify the bonding issues the Richard Mason discussed with you 1 hope that this clears up any confusion which have resulted. Please don't hesitate to call with any questions. Signed: Of Approved NEW PUD Site Plan From North Idaho Engineers Approved plans showing the Harmony /Indiana intersection Todd R. Whipple, P.E. enclosure cc: Ed Dean, Dean Housley Company P.01 • July 25, 1997 IPE W.O. 96106 Spokane County Engineers Office 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, Wa. 99260 -0170 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Attn: Mr. Ed Parry Jr., P.E. RE: Riverwalk 1" Addition (Public Road Improvements) P1414 Dear Ed, RECEIVED JUL 2 8 1997 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Inland Pacific Engineering has completed the inspections corresponding to the "Construction Deficiency List" dated June 6, 1997. We find these items in substantial conformance with the approved plan set, as well as noting all substantial differences from the original approved plan set on our "Record Drawings ". At the request of our client, Dean- Housley Company, we request the review and final walk through of the above mentioned project. Please note this submittal and walk through only pertains to the public portion of Mission Avenue and Indiana Avenue. If you have any questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. Todd R. Whipple, P.E. President enc. Street plan sheets 1,2, and 7 of 9 Supplemental Drawings Is, 2s, 3s of 5s Irrigation plan L2 of 5 submittal package including correspondence, test reports, and daily reports cc. Verne Jacobsen, Dean Housley Co. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509 -458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 -765 -7784 • FAX: 208 -769 -7277 May 21, 1997 Todd Whipple, P.E. Inland Pacific Engineering /Mark Hancock Stanton Development/Dean Houseiy Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Bellevue, WA 98052 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk 1st Addition Pond Ml: Submittal Accepted Gentlemen: Sincerely, DIVISION OF ENGI.NEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director We have conducted a general evaluation of your recent submittal for this project, and we find that this submittal appears to meet the minimum standards of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction ("Standards"). We are therefore able to accept your construction plans and drainage calculations for this project. I am enclosing a blackline print and a mylar of your approved road and drainage plans for this project: the originals are on tile at the Public Works Department. The approved drainage report is also on file at the Public Works Department. This approval is valid until May 21, 1999. If the facilities are not constructed by that date, you may request an extension of the acceptance for an additional two years: the plans shall he revised prior to granting the extension. Please note: 1. The County's acceptance of this submittal does not relieve the sponsor or his agents from any liability related to portions of the design that are not in contortnance with the Standards, or which do not follow good engineering practice. 2. All permits and notifications necessary prior to construction are the responsibility of the project sponsor and/or his assigned agents; and 3.Consmicdon documentation and certified Record Drawings are required prior to the release of any surety for Construction Engineering. If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry at 456 -3600. Thank you. William A. Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Edward J. Partq, Jr., P.E. Plan Review Engineer encls: Plans (1 set) cc: project file revie,Wb W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 May 22, 1997 W.O. 96106 W.M. Winkler Co. E. 1822 Fairview Spokane, WA 99207 Attn: Jim Winkler Re: Riverwalk P.U.D. 1" Addition Dear Jim, Per our conversation this afternoon, you asked us to schedule staking for the cross -gutter at Indiana & McMillan. You said that your crew would rip out the cross -gutter Tuesday morning and then IPE's survey crew could stake it. The entire cross -gutter needs to be ripped out to be properly constructed as designed. We will mark the area to be removed prior to your work. I have scheduled the staking with our survey crew for 11:00 am on Tuesday, May 27 1997. Verne has also notified us that you would be replacing a portion of sidewalk on Indiana that was damaged by US WEST. You will not be able to remove and replace the sidewalk in one day. When you remove the sidewalk, we will need to do a proctor and perform a density test, and verify the 4" thickness prior to pouring. Verne said you would be removing the sidewalk on Tuesday. We will perform our test that day and notify you when the tests have passed and you can repour the sidewalk. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering anelle Poe, `E.I.T. JDPTJdp cc: Verne Jacobsen/FAX RAZ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 509 - 458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 208 -765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 TO: Purpose Signed• cc: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -6844 ATTENTION: EA p,., y , , Description ( l Xerox Prints 0 Copy of Letter 0 Original Drawing 0 Contract Documents El Work Authorization 0 Report hr AY 1 ;97 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ems" �f �S o-F- "1 1 #2, ZP� /�- / a (.>P i± ieS t f /anvts No. Copies � Description � \, s Information 0 Review & Comments 0 Per Your Request 0 Written Approval E1 Signature & Return Remarks of Q_ I t .� vt0,14) PCYna M t 1421rt-,S ch w Milin -- 4 DATE: S I (4 /q+ a I.P.E. PROJECT #. (n 1 6 G PROJECT NAME: RIING/t,W�IC 41- / 0' 9I • I Ml D VBNSMCPM5 SCALE: 1" =20' a N 4• r z N 60'001 E- - - - - - r 7900' 1 I • L EDGE OF PAVEMENT STA. 14+20, 20' LT. SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE "K DRYWELL I NLAND I �� PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 7 20' BLDG. SETBACK 16' DRNG. & UTILITY EASMT. 60.66' 14 BALDWIN LANE 2 ' 4 •. x " 31' I =7.25' R- 13.26' PROPOSED POND BOTTOM AREA 19 +58.83 ■MCMILLAN LANE 0 it J BALDWIN LANE in 14 +81.71 LOT 7, BLOCK 4 RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION 0 r Z z rn . CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE EASMT. 0 J DATE: 05/15/97 SCALE: 1 " =20' r 60'00'0 E - - — T - 79.00'. L- EDGE OF PAVEMENT 14 7 20' BLDG. SETBACK 16' DRNG. & UTILITY EASMT. STA. 14+20, 20' LT. SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE "A" DRYWELL 60.66' BALDWIN LANE 1. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 I =7.25' 2 zs- F 7 U z 0 f0 R= 13.26' I/ / PROPOSED POND BOTTOM AREA BALDWIN LANE a 14 +81.71 19 +58.83 =MCMILLAN LANE INLAND LOT 7, BLOCK 4 I r PACIFIC RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION ENGINEERING 0 r 1 CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE EASMT. J DATE: 05/15/97 May 5, 1997 I.P.E. W.O. #96106 Dean-Deily Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 ATTN: Mark Hancock RE: Riverwalk 1" Addition Dear Mark: Sincerely, Inlan )i Pacific En eeriing, Inc. Todd R. Whipple, P.E. JDP /jdp I I� INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. We have sent you several letters, faxes, and plans stating and showing what needs to be done in Riverwalk 1" to meet the minimum standards of Spokane County. We have been working with your contractor (K.C. Construction) and assisting them with pond corrections. At the request of K.C. Construction, we will be staking the proposed pond bottom areas of several ponds needing enlarging. After all the correspondence we have sent you, why do we continue to receive faxes from you asking what kind of work is required on Riverwalk 1"? We are tired of these innuendos that IPE is not working to complete this project. If these innuendos continue we will stop our participation in getting this project completed altogether. We are aware that you want this project completed and accepted, likewise so do we. As stated in previous letters, you are responsible for scheduling such as the grout inspection you have mentioned in a recent fax. Coordination is essential to complete this project. Please call Bruce Howard, our inspection engineer, and schedule someone to do this testing if you desire it.. Please call us with any questions. cc: Ed Parry, Plan Review Engineer, Spokane County Public Works Ed Dean, Dean-Deily Company 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 309-458-6844 1 ?DOCUMENTS 96106bdla417. W PO 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208 -769 -7277 April 28, 1997 I.P.E. W.O. #96106 Dean-Deily Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. ATTN: Mark Hancock RE: Riverwalk Corrective Work Dear Mark: This letter is in response to your April 24 and April 25 memos faxed to us last week. In your memos you asked what inspections, testing, drawings, and calculations were left for Riverwalk 1" 2nd and 3r You also wondered what drawings /letters have been sent since our April 17 deficiency letter. Below is a summary of what has been sent to you via fax and/or mail since the deficiency letter. April 22: We sent a notification that the WWP utility box had been moved at the corner of Harmony & Mission, so that you could schedule the relocation of the Mission sidewalk. April 22: Copy of plan change letter submitted to Spokane County for Pond M, requiring an additional pond at a low point on Baldwin near McMillan Lane. April 22: - Typical pond section detail sheets showing the corrected grate elevations. The sheets I had given you previously, showed a maximum grate elevation of 0.8' from pond bottom and has now been corrected to 8 ", or 0.67'. April 28: Faxed over this morning, copies of two faxes that were sent to Verne Jacobsen last week on April 24. In our April 17 letter we stated that you are required to schedule the work needed as well as notify us of the schedule for inspection. We have not completed any grout testing of structures as of today, because we have not been scheduled for this. Coordination is essential to complete this project. Please call Bruce Howard, our inspection engineer, and schedule someone to do this testing. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509 458 - 6840 • FAX: 509 - 458 - 6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 - 765 - 7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 Riverwalk Corrective Work April 28, 1997 Page 2 In response to the other questions in your memo: Sincerely, Inland Pacific E Todd R. Whipple, P.E. ering, Inc. ql GA' il ovi You have asked if pond P in the 1 Addition Park is required. The 1" addition basin map shows that this pond was designed to facilitate runoff from offsite basins. However, due to the park being developed and upstream conditions being developed and cut -off by new drainage facilities, this pond is no longer required. A new pond is required on Baldwin as described in the April 22 letter previously sent. We will attempt to design this within the existing drainage easement so no additional easement will need to be acquired. A new detail is being made for the Pond(s) I along the west side of Harmony Lane to ensure that they are contained within the easements. One pond is currently constructed outside the easement, and the new plan will show how to rectify the matter. Verne has been informed to throw away the old plans which were given to you at our last meeting. The cross -gutter is really needed and required. We need to have a minimum two days notice prior to construction so that we can schedule our survey crew to be there, we only want to do this once more. Therefore, you must keep both Winkler and IPE on the same schedule. We will notify you and send the approved details for Pond(s) I, Pond M, and the new Pond M2 as soon as they are ready and approved. You must remember to please notify us in advance of all construction so that we can have an inspector on -site to meet Spokane County requirements. Please call with any questions. c:-__Ed Parry, Plan Review Engineer, Spokane County Public -Works RECEIVED APR 2 e '997 SPl1RANE cm)." ;;;GINEER (2029) - 45 � RNexwa(k F 5: 4 - \ RivERWAL.lt --- /\ /. \ (2 01 A0 \ \ rlF y ^ EST: 4 \ 4 \ \ \ r` \ r„ \ /, i � �w\N rm rw -rv.cirxx s ■ �IOflhI BAS IN-y-1 - MISSION AVENUE «5 RIVmWALk T "BAsIN MAp \ \ / V J v \ \ \ \ C 51 / \ TRACT "R" h''R, c BALE April 24, 1997 MEMORANDUM • TO: Ed Parry I@ Spokane County cc: Mike Klika Todd Whipple (a3 Inland Pacific Engineering Verne Jacobsen Ed Dean FROM: Mark Hancock Q Dean Deily RE: Riverwalk Completion Work - 1st, 2nd & 3rd Additions Verne Jacobsen and I met with Mike Klika at the Riverwalk site Tuesday, and we plan to begin and complete the corrective work at Riverwalk in the next week or so. In order to do so, we need your help with a number of questions, so here are the ones we have so far (in no particular order): 1) Todd - Have you completed the grout testing of structures that you planned to do? . If not, how soon will it be done? (& are there any other testing/inspections planned of existing work, or are the lists we now have the last ones other than the work we're about to do ?) • 2) Todd & Ed - Why is pond P in the in Addition park required? (it doesn't seem . needed, and we'd rather not do it) _3) Ed - What did Inland Asphalt propose to Bill Johns regarding the Indiana credit? (your notes with the 8th Addition letter said "no action" was needed ?) 4) • Todd - Have you completed ALL pond surveys and revision drawings, and do we now have all your current material to complete the job? (including ponds G,H,1, &M ?) 5) Note: The Mission sidewalk relocation will now proceed since the power is out of • the way, using most recent IPE drawings (Winkler will do, w /new permit). 6) Todd - Where are you and Winkler regarding the cross gutter status? Have you double checked pond calc's to make sure it is really needed? (note to Mike/Verne - get permit this time, & notify Ed Parry & IPE before • work so they can attend the pour. Also, Ed Pan suggested Fibermesh additive in concrete to avoid cracking that has already happened in new • one) 7) Todd - Does Ed Parry now have all inspection and test reports and calc's for lst /2nd/3rd Additions? (e.g. no, paperwork left to do or hand over?) If not, what's left other than inspecting and certifying the work we're about to do? Riverwalk questions, 4/24/97, page 2 8) Ed - I'll send you a separate letter regarding completion of the pond landscape and _ irrigation per our discussions. 9) mod.. -1met last week with Allen of Artistic Landscape and showed him the as -built information we needed - he was going to contact you to make sure he understood the requirements before he did the drawings. 10) Note: We are doing all corrective work (public & private) under original permits where original contractors are used (new contractors need new permits) 11) Note: While completing the public Indiana work is our first priority, we will also be completing the work in 1st Addition private areas, and then the balance of any work remaining in 2nd and 3rd Additions as well. We will have all work done in the next week or two, so IPE can certify and Ed Parry can accept before Ed leaves for first two weeks of June (while Ed is gone, then, the County inspectors would be able to go out and do their inspections in \ early June, so KC can do whatever else is necessary to finish the work in late June before the plans expire on July 5). l 12)'Ed'- Have you been able to check with the drywell cleaning people about their lk 1'. ability to do maintenance on drywells that are: 1) certain distances from the, street, and 2) where lids/cones may be offset a little to accommodate • surface conditions? 13) Todd - I am uncomfortable with your comment to Ed in your letter of 3/28, item 9,b). Without easements shown on detail sheets, we must assume that your pond revisions on all detail sheets fit within existing easements unless • you show /tell us otherwise. Are you aware of any conflicts where ponds are being expanded outside of existing easements? Thanks a lot for your help. !q i S i G K A N E ;,� j.�` � C o U N T Y DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer April 10, 1997 Stanton Spokane 16720 NE 116th Redmond, Wa 98052 Re: P1414 Gentlemen: Our records indicate that bill numbers 7651 and 7736, dated January 9, 1997 and Fetruari 3, 1997, in the total amount .S 1,351.99, has nct been paid. Spokane County has contracted the services of SCA Credit, Inc., a collection agency. If this amount is not paid in full within thirty (30) days, it will be referred to SCA Credit, Inc. for collection without further notice Please contact this office if you have any questions. Sincerely, Steve Case Accounting Technician (509) 324-3277 cc: Planning Engineer - Ed Parry • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPART ?TENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director 2783 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 April 1, 1997 W.O. 96106 Spokane County Engineers 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 -0710 Attn: Ed J. Parry, Jr., P.E. Re: Riverwalk P.U.D. 1" Addition Dear Ed, This letter is an addendum to the letter dated March 28,1997 which accompanied the Record Drawings for Riverwalk 1" Addition. The intent of the original letter was to provide you with a listing of those remaining construction items which we believe would allow the County to perform its acceptance inspections. The list had been divided into public and private items describing matters that still required some work. In our letter we realized that we did not include that the sidewalk on Mission Avenue needs to be removed and reconstructed as redesigned by Inland Pacific Engineering and accepted by Spokane County. This is a public facility and requires correcting before Rivenvalk 1 can be accepted by Spokane County. One other item that was brought to our attention is that Pond C on the southeast comer of Harmony & Indiana requires sodding on the east end of the pond. Sincerely, Inla9d Pacific F ineering • INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Todd R. Whipple, P.E. TRW /jp cc: Mark Hancock, Dean Housley Company 707 West 71h • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suiie 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 - 765 - 7784.• FAX: 208- 769 -7277 IR'F ;EIVED APR 0 7 1997 SPONANt COUNDY ENGINEER March 28, 1997 W.O. 96106 Spokane County Engineers 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 -0710 Attn: Ed J. Parry, Jr., P.E. Re: Riverwalk P.U.D. 1" Addition Dear Ed, irr INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. RECEIVED MAR 2 8 19y/ SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER This letter accompanies the Record Drawings for Riverwalk 1" Addition as well as a letter outlining or responding to your comments on your last review. The intent of this letter is to provide you with a listing of those remaining construction items which we believe will allow the County to perform your acceptance inspections. At this time there remains a number of items needing attention within this project. Although there are deficient items remaining, IPEC is proposing to submit the Record Drawings to Spokane County and update them as the remaining public and private related deficient construction items are reconstructed, constructed and corrected. We feel that it is in the County's best interest to accept the record drawing submittal and allow this process to continue. Below is a list of the items needing attention that were obvious to IPEC during our last walk through on March 27, 1997, within Rivenvalk 1 Addition. I've separated the list between the public roads and facilities needing attention and the private roads and facilities. In general, the public road and private roadway construction portion of this project is essentially complete. Those items remaining to be constructed, reconstructed or corrected generally relate to the storm drainage ponds, inlets, pipes and structures. At the present time the only minor item relating to the public roads is that they need to be swept to remove the winter and construction debris and gravel that has accumulated. Following are the items pertaining to public roads or facilities. 1. Cross Gutter at Indiana and McMillan As you know this gutter as poured was under some scrutiny due to lack of current building permit and possible improper additive. Additionally, the configuration of the cross gutter did not match the new design prepared by IPEC as the original design approved by the County and designed by North Idaho Engineers would not work as designed. As a final inspection and verification procedure IPEC performed a flow test on March 14, 1997 to insure that the intent of Spokane County March 28, 1997 Page 2 the cross gutter design would convey flow to match the storm water design report. The test included opening the fire hydrant upstream to replicate an approximate flow of 0.5 cfs to 1.0 cfs to insure that the gutter would operate as designed. As constructed the cross gutter did not pass the flow test and therefore needs to be removed and reconstructed as designed. The testing revealed that the cross - gutter across McMillan was not constructed with the proper flow paths as runoff is not totally contained within cross -gutter to flow along Indiana Avenue as designed. In some areas on the gutter, some runoff leaves the cross - gutter and flows towards the two ponds on either side of McMillan Lane intended to only hold water from the private streets. 2. Pond A, Indiana Avenue The drywell grate needs to be raised to be 0.5' above pond bottom, (proposed grate elev. 2024.94, pond bottom approximately= 2024.44). 3. Pond F, southwest corner of Harmony and Indiana A solid locking cover over the drywell needs to be installed at the sidewalk elevation so that the drywell can be cleaned. The grate over the inlet in the ditch needs to be replaced with a solid cover. At this time the drywell has been raised, and the contractor is waiting for the weather warm up in order to pour the new sidewalk section around the rim. Within the pond the catch basin rim should be raised from elevation 2027.70 to elevation 2027.85 (pond bottom approxi mately= 2027.3 5) The following pertain to private roads or facilities. 4. Pond N, southeast corner of McMillan and Indiana This pond was designed to collect stormwater from McMillan Avenue only. It was constructed without an inlet to allow stormwater into the pond, with the swale directly discharging into the drywell. A portion of the sidewalk needs to be removed, a Type 2 curb inlet installed, and the ditch regraded through the inlet to the pond. In addition, the grate within the pond needs to be lowered 0.3' to ensure that no ponding in the street occurs. The lowering of the grate requires that the pond bottom also be lowered by 0.5'. The grate inlet along McMillan lane needs to be raised and replaced with a solid cover. A plan for these corrections is attached. 5. Pond L The drywell rim is 0.66' above the graded pond bottom, and still requires sodding and irrigation. 6. Pond G, northeast corner of Harmony and Baldwin This pond was constructed too small, and the drywell rim is less than 0.5' above the pond floor. Reconstructing the pond bottom at elevation 2027.27 will ensure proper `208' treatment. Enclosed is the surveyed as- constructed pond size with a copy of the approved pond plan. Please Spokane County March 28, 1997 Page 3 note that the approved pond plan is approximately 2X the size required for `208' treatment. A plan is attached showing a retaining wall for this pond, to enlarge it enough to provide the required volume. 7. Pond H, southeast corner of Harmony and Baldwin The catch basin needs to be raised so that it is 0.5' above the pond bottom. The drywell grate in the ditch needs to be replaced with a solid lid as called out on the plans. There is no sidewalk inlet; therefore, a section of sidewalk needs to be removed and a type 2 curb inlet installed so stormwater can enter the pond. The swale /ditch will then need to be regraded to the inlet. 8. Pond I(s), Harmony Lane These three ponds are not large enough to provide the required volume for `208' treatment. Combined, these three ponds along Harmony Lane need to provide a minimum of 929 cubic feet. Together, they are only providing 720 cubic feet. A plan to correct this is attached. 9. Pond 0, southwest corner of McMillan and Baldwin The drywell is located under the sidewalk and needs to be raised to the sidewalk elevation and a solid lid put on it. The pond needs to be enlarged, and the bottom graded flat. The grate in the street needs to be replace with a solid lid, and the ditch graded to the curb inlet. This pond still requires sodding and irrigation. Enclosed is the surveyed as constructed pond size, a proposed plan, and a copy of the approved pond. 10. Pond P, common area Pond P has not yet been constructed. Enclosed is a copy of the approved plan. Spokane County March 28, 1997 Page 4 Even with the minor deficiencies noted we are recommending that County reduce the bond on Indiana to a modest 10- percent which would still be adequate in the event that the drainage items are not constructed. At this point the street section of Indiana should be ready to accept even with the minor drainage items left to accomplish and we feel that we are ready for a final walk through and punch list compilation with yourself or other County representatives. Should you have any questions regarding this information please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Inlarkl Pacific,Er]gineering Todd R. Whipple, P.E. TRW /trw /jdg enclosures - deficiency work order drawings for each pond cc: Mark Hancock, Dean 1- lousely file i \S- \ tl POWER VAULT LIGHT POST STREET SIGN BASIN POND "G" 96106 REQUIRED '208' POND VOLUME = 232 CU.FT. DESIGNED '208' POND VOLUME = 675 CU.FT. CONSTRUCTED '208' POND VOLUME = 62 CU.FT. 1 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -684 4 Spokane, WA 99204 16' UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT \ TREE O r a 9AdT 041 ENE 2 SCALE: " =20' i EO 1 CONSTRUCTED POND BOTTOM SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD B -1 TYPE " " DRYWELL WITH TYPE "3" METAL FRAME AND GRATE, GRATE EL. = 2027.77 BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA EXPIRES 9/24/ LOT 2, BLOCK 4 RIVERWALK 1ST. ADDITION AS CONSTRUCTED DRAWINGDATE: 03/24/97 96106 ,0 BASIN POND "G" d PROPOSED BOUNDARY ` OF POND BOTTOM AREA REQUIRED '208' POND VOLUME = 232 CU.FT. DESIGNED '208' POND VOLUME = 675 CU.FT. CONSTRUCTED '208' POND VOLUME = 62 CU.FT. (REVISED '208' POND VOLUME = 276 CU.FT.) 1 INLAND I1! PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 \ 16' UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT 2.88. TREE BA` w 2 16.51' SCALE: 1 " =20' INSTALL 24 HIGH x 55' LONG "KEYSTONE" TYPE RETAINING WALL EN BOUNDARY OF LEVEL FLAT BOTTOM AREA EXPIRES 9/24/ LOT 2, BLOCK 4 RIVERWALK 1 ST. ADDITION (509) 458 -6840 ( PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION DATE: 03/24/97 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 EDGE OF PAVEMENT RIGHT OF WAY •.w1 AHD TH �f �1 TYPE 4 METAL FRArE� NO &RATE s � STA.1O.5358 • d \ , GRATE ELEV. 2024. OFF5ET 195' RIGHT BASIN C POND BOTTOM E 2VATIOW • 207141 VOLJl1@ REGARID • 292 cart. VOLUME PROVIDE) • 615 cult 96106 EXISTING DRYWELL 1.0 w 1 F C 1 3.1 ' r 16' UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT Pboab t r• INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 - 6844 40 .78' EXISTING BUILDING 4 SCALE: 1" =20' CONSTRUCTED BOUNDARY OF POND BOTTOM AREA "1 1 DRAINAGE EASEMENT -- EASEMENT EXISTING CATCH BASIN GRATE ELEV. = 2027.73 EXPIRES 9/24/ LOT 4, BLOCK 3 RIVERWALK 1ST. ADDITION AS CONSTRUCTED DRAWINGDATE: 03/24/97 96106 BASIN POND 'FP EXISTING DRYWELL REMOVE GRATE AND REPLACE WITH SOLID COVER I 16' UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT INLAND rim PACIFIC ENGINEERING 1 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 REGRADE DITCH THROUGH INLET TO POND BOTTOM REQUIRED '208' POND VOLUME = 292 CU.FT. DESIGNED '208' POND VOLUME = 650 CU.FT. CONSTRUCTED '208' POND VOLUME = 351 CU.FT. 4 SCALE: 1" =20' BREAK -OUT SIDEWALK AND INSTALL TYPE "2" CURB INLET AT STA. 10 +80.19 RT. - EXISTING CATCH BASIN GRATE ELEV. = 2027.73 RAISE TO ELEV. = 2028.23 CONSTRUCTED BOUNDARY OF POND BOTTOM AREA REGRADE DITCH THROUGH INLET TO POND BOTTOM — / DRAINAGE 1 EASEMENT 1 J 'EXPIRES 9/24/ LOT 4, BLOCK 3 RIVERWALK 1ST. ADDITION P ROPOSED CONSTRUCTION DATE: 03/24/97 HARMONY LP,NE F &. 2021.10 COW INLET TYPE 2 WITH PETAL GRATE TYPE 2 STA. 10+6124 &RATE ELEV. 202/.60 OFFSET 46.42' LIt NTH ±43 LF. 12' OAP. o t2% 6RADE R.161 4T OF WAY X351 H POND BOTTOM ELEVATION • 2021.10 VOLUME REGUIR 52 • 242 cal VOLUME PR4vror0 • 650 urn. SPOKANE COUffY STAI0ARD TTPE'0' ORYYFI.L HIT! SOLID LOC.KINS LIP STA 10+5358 ORATE ELEV. 202811 OFFSET TT RIGHT IDeE OF 'PAV ENT SIDB^WY . CROSS - GUTTER SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE A DRYWELL WITH SO LID. GRATE ELEV. =20 STREET NAME SIGN IEXPIRES 9/24/ LAMP POST 96106 Cti 1 INLAND NC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 BACK OF 6' SIDEWALK TYPE B CURB & GUTTER RIGHT OF WAY /v.. _• \ IS //. .1.5- -t- ti. \ • • / .' / / / q9 • • ' / / 25,' • � .• / X 21 • / / CATCH BASIN RIM 16' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BACK OF SIDEWALK • BASIN POND "N" 13' UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT TYPE 2 CONCRETE INLET 1 REQUIRED '208' POND VOLUME = 492 CU.FT. CONSTRUCTED '208' POND VOLUME = 497 CU.FT. SCALE: 1 " =20' 1 RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION POND "N ", SW. CORNER OF McMILLAN AND INDIANA AS CONSTRUCTED DRAWING DATE 03/19/97 NOTE: IF THE EXISTING INLET WITHIN THE POND HAS RISERS THAT CAN BE REMOVED, NOTHING NEEDS TO BE DONE WITH THE PIPES. HOWEVER, IF THE WHOLE INLET REQUIRES LOWERING, THE PIPE WILL NEED TO BE TORN UP AND REINSERTED MAINTAINING A 2% SLOPE. IEXPIRES 9/24/ 96106 1 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 RIGHT OF WAY i 7 BREAK OUT SIDEWALK & \ INSERT TYPE 2 CURB INLET. i NEED TO LOWER CONSTRUCTED POND BOTTOM 0.5' BELOW INLET GRATE. PROPOSED POND BOTTOM ELEV= 2026.31 13' UTILITY AND 7 � \ DRAINAGE EASEMENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT REGRADE DITCH THROUGH INLET TO POND BOTTOM CATCH BASIN RAISE GRATE 0.3' AND REPLACE WITH SOLID COVER. LID ELEV= 2027.54 16' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BASIN POND "N" TYPE 2 CONCRETE INLET LOWER GRATE BY 0.3' EXISTING GRATE ELEV= 2027.11 PROPOSED GRATE ELEV= 2026.81 1 REQUIRED '208' POND VOLUME = 492 CU.FT. CONSTRUCTED '208' POND VOLUME = 497 CU.FT. NEED TO MAINTAIN POND BOTTOM AREA. WILL REQUIRE KEYSTONE WALL TO STAY WITHIN EASEMENT. SCALE: 1 " =20' J RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION POND "N ", SW. CORNER OF McMILLAN AND INDIANA PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION DATE: 03/19/97 INDIANA AVENUE TYPE 'A' DRriai. MTH SOLID LOCXJNB LID • ORATE H2Y 2026.99 BASIN N POND BOTTOM 9PJATION • 2026.46 VOLUME MO • 412 cart. VOl1T@ FROAIDBD • 640 cWL HITH METAL BRAZE TYPE 2 STA. 22+34.16 McMILLAH LANE BRATS ELEV. 2026.95 OFFSET 60 RIGHT MTH 140 LF. 12 GMP.. 12% BRAZE \ 96105 EXISTING DRYWELL UNDER SIDEWALK. 14 \N e P�o� \ % i 16' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT CONSTRUCTED BOUNDARY OF POND BOTTOM AREA BASIN POND "O" EXISTING BUILDING 1 REQUIRED '208' POND VOLUME = 384 CU.FT. DESIGNED '208' POND VOLUME = 870 CU.FT. CONSTRUCTED '208' POND VOLUME = 344 CU.FT. I p ie= INLAND C PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 EXISTING INLET IN DITCH EXISTING TYPE INLET � \ \ \ i "" �\ \\ \ EXISTING CATCH BASIN \ GRATE EL. = 2030.15 \ f\ \ 16' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT SCALE: 1 " =20' EXPIRES 9/24/ LOT 1, BLOCK 5 RIVERWALK 1ST. ADDITION AS CONSTRUCTED DRAWINGDATE 03/24/97 EXISTING DRYWELL UNDER SIDEWALK. RAISE DRYWELL RING AND COVER TO MEET EXISTING SIDEWALK ELEV. SUPPLY SOLID LOCKING COVER ENLARGE POND BOTTOM AS SHOWN 16' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT BASIN POND "O" •■44 - thN4 \ • 1 REQUIRED '208' POND VOLUME = 384 CU.FT. DESIGNED '208' POND VOLUME = 870 CU.FT. CONSTRUCTED '208' POND VOLUME = 344 CU.FT. (REVISED '208' POND VOLUME = 438 CU.FT.) 96106 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 EXISTING INLET IN DITCH TO BE REMOVED, REGRADE DITCH TO TYPE "2" INLET 16' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT SCALE: 1 " =20' EXPIRES 9/24/ LOT 1, BLOCK 5 RIVERWALK 1 ST. ADDITION P ROPOSED CONSTRUCTION DATE: 03/24/97 STA. 14.24.94 INN. ELEV. 2029.83 BASIN 0 POND BOTTOM ELEVATION • 202929 VOLIVE MARRED • 964 cult VOLUME PROVIDED • 89O cult SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE 'B' DRY1a1 WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME AND ORATE STA H.rL62 ORATE ELEV. 202933 OFFSET IT RIGHT 31 35 BAS I N F FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS POND BOTTOM ELEVATION • 2071300 votug Rt<2ARED • 0 wit. VOtL*t PROVIDED • 945 colt. 10 EXISTING BUILDING 96106 __J 13 BASIN POND " I j 5. 9 1 t 1/4--- ---EXISTING BUILDING .CONSTRUCTED BOUNDARY OF POND BOTTOM AREA 1 t EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 7 I 1 1 6' UTILITY AND I � /DRAINAGE EASEMENT I > I XISTIN CURB INLET HARMONY LANE REQUIRED '208' POND VOLUME = 929 CU.FT. DESIGNED '208' POND VOLUME = 1050 CU.FT. CONSTRUCTED "208" POND VOLUME = 807 CU.FT. (REVISED "208" POND VOLUME = 1045 CU.FT.) I IJ J / / o m M/ ❑ O TR .rn °L1 x.19' 15 L _ EXISTING TYP CURB INLET HARMONY LANE 6 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING BUILDING CONSTRUCTED BOUNDARY OF POND BOTTOM AREA 16' UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT 2' 5 __J SCALE: 1 " =20' EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING BUILDING 5 r CONSTRUCTED BOUNDARY OF POND BOTTOM AREA N' I� I 1 0 1 ' IN EXISTING CONCRETE INLET TYPE "2" 12" C.M.P. PIPE 16' UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT XISTING TYPE "2" CURB INLET EXISTING TYPE "B" DRYWELL 1 EXPIRES 9/24/ 1 INLAND � PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 LOTS 10, 9, 7, 6, 5, 4 BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1 ST. ADDITION AS CONSTRUCTED DRAWING DATE: 03/24/97 96106 10 __J 13 BASIN POND "r 707 West 7th • Suite Spokane, WA 99204 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 200 (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 9 HARMONY LANE 7 CONSTRUCTED BOUNDARY OF POND BOTTOM AREA 1 1 / 6' UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT REQUIRED '208' POND VOLUME = 929 CU.FT. DESIGNED '208' POND VOLUME = 1050 CU.FT. CONSTRUCTED "208" POND VOLUME = 807 CU.FT. (REVISED "208" POND VOLUME = 1045 CU.FT.) 4.43' L =3.74' L =2.10 15 CONSTRUCTED .! POND BOTTOM AREA BOUNDARY OF HARMONY LANE EXISTING FENCE LINE 6 PROPOSED POND BOTTOM INSTALL 2' HIGH x 80' LONG 5 KEYSTONE TYPE RETAINING WALL 16' UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT HARMONY LANE INSTALL 2' HIGH x 93' LONG KEYSTONE TYPE RETAINING WALL CONSTRUCTED BOUNDARY OF POND BOTTOM AREA EXISTING CONCRETE INLET TYPE "2" RAISE GRATE ELEV. FROM 2027.38 TO EL. 2027.53 16' UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT EXISTING R.O.W. EXISTING TYPE "B" DRYWELL REPLACE COVER WITH TYPE "4" SOLID COVER WAS y 'O •0 o't 4 < -o C7 , 5462 ms s /ONAL SCALE: 1 " =20' I EXPIRES 9/24/ LOTS 10, 9, 7, 6, 5, 4 BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1 ST. ADDITION PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION DATE: 03/24/97 J 10 9 LOT LINE STA 13411.46 ELEV. 203051 STA. 13+16.41 TOP BERM 2031.01 S T 13+21.42 INV. ELEV. 203051 STA. 15+06.46 F.E. 2028.06 INV. ELEV. 202856 STA. 15+11.41 TOP BERM 202906 LOT LINE 7 6 20 14 14 a 70' N CONCRETE INLET 2 WITH I €TAL CRATE TYPE 2 STA 16+41.43 CRATE ELEV. 202759 OFFSET 55' LEFT WIN S 38 LF. 12' CAP. • 12% GRADE STA 15+16,42 INN. ELEV. 202856 HARMONY LANE BASIN I PO/42 BOTTOM ELEVATION • 2 OSO01/2O28p6/2027.09 VOLLME RBCiARED • 929 0.41t VOW.* PROv1OB7 • 1030 Wit. F.C. 2027.09 LOT LINE STA 16+41. - OKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE 13' DRrra.L KIN SOUP LOCKING LID STA 16+2600 CRATE ELEV. 2027.93 OFFSET 11' LEFT R,•SHT OF WAY 51,:.'64ALK EDsE OF PAVEMENT 5IOEWAL K 1111DERDRAJN STA 16«41.43 INV. ELEV. 2027E • April 3, 1997 Todd Whipple. P.E. Inland Pacific Engineering 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 SUBJECT: P1414G - Riverwalk 3th Addition Plan Submittal (IPE letter dated March 19, 1997) Gentlemen: DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E.. County Engineer • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 We have considered your request, and have reviewed our files for the various phases of the Riverwalk project. The primary access point is located at the easterly end of Indiana in Riverwalk 6th. It appears that access to Riverwalk 8th is. by any routing plan, avaiiable only by traveling some distance on Indiana Avenue. At our last site visit on April 2, 1997, Indiana had not yet been paved from the east boundary of Riverwalk 2nd, through Riverwalk 6th, to the access point for Riverwalk 8th. We would like to note that the plat approval for Riverwalk 7th was granted in spite of the lack of approved plans for the Barker Road improvements. Those improvements became necessary due to the lot threshold which IPE had indicated would require those improvements. The plan acceptance of Riverwalk 7th was not affected by the acceptance of Indiana, as the primary access to most of the Riverwalk 7th lots is expected to occur from Mission Avenue. The County has been working with IPE since at (east the Spring of 1996 on developing the construction documentation for those phases of Riverwalk which constructed Indiana, and the supporting drainage facilities. up to the westerly boundary of Riverwalk 6th (phases 1, 2, and 3). This was all so that following phases which access Indiana could have plans submitted and plats approved. The first submittal of the Record Drawings and supporting documents for phase 1 was received in November 1996, and comments were returned in December 1996. To date, the actions necessary to address the various comments noted in our review of IPE's submittals for phases 1, 2. and 3 have not yet been completed. We acknowledge receipt of the Phase 1 Record Drawings submitted at your meeting with Ed Parry on March 28, 1997. You also indicated in that meeting that the Record Drawings for phases 2 and 3 would be submitted by April 2, 1997. As you will recall, the plans for Riverwalk 4th and 5th also were not to be submitted until the County had accepted the construction and established Indiana for maintenance. This position was taken so that the Sponsor did not get placed in the position of having to maintain and plow what would be the major access into and through this large subdivision until the roads were finally established as County - maintained roads. This is similar to the situation in the Westwood Subdivision, with which you are familiar. It is unfortunate that this position had to be taken on those projects. but it was the only option available to the County to encourage some action toward the acceptance of Indiana. As the Sponsor demonstrated progress on the acceptance of Indiana, Todd Whipple, P.E. P14146 - Plan Submittal April 3, 1997 Page 2 of 3 the County relaxed that position w accepting the plans for review, and then construction. with plat approval of those phases to be granted when Indiana had been established. At our February 24, 1997 meeting with the Sponsor of phases 1, 2, and 3, we had indicated the County Engineer would be willing to consider granting Final Approval for Riverwalk 4th and 5th prior w acceptance of Indiana. This, however, was contingent upon continued progress toward the acceptance and establishment of Indiana. We are concerned that with the Record Drawings having been submitted, progress in processing the calculations to support the plan changes may stagnate. This will have an effect on the plat approvals for Riverwalk 4th and 5th. There are many items which can, and should be completed prior to the actual submittal of the Record Drawings and supporting documents. Among these items are any plan changes which are contemplated. Plan Change Requests should be treated in a fashion analogous to a Design Deviation Request in the project design process. If plan changes are necessary to account for field conditions, then the justification for those changes. to include all supporting calculations, will need to be submitted, and then receive the County Engineer's approval, prior to submitting the Record Drawings. This is necessary so that (I) the processing of the Record Drawings is not delayed by the processing of the plan changes. and (2) so that Record Drawings are not returned due to plan changes which the County Engineer will not approve. This will also minimize the potential to re- record any additional easements which may result from the proposed plan change. We are enclosing a list which summarizes generally the actions necessary to address the different categories of the comments provided. Please refer to the actual comments (previously provided) for the specific items of concern. Our file search indicates that calculations showing how the revised ponds meet GSM requirements for water quality treatment and storage volume have not yet been submitted. Although the County Engineer's Office is primarily concerned with the calculations for ponds receiving runoff from public rights -of -way, calculations for all pond revisions (including those which serve only the private roads) are needed as part of the public record for this project. We will allow the submittal of road and drainage plans for Riverwalk 8th and 9th Additions at this time. in light of the above, we do not feel that it would be prudent to accept for construction plan submittals for those additional projects which can be expected to have their primary access from Indiana, until Indiana has been accepted, and established by the County for maintenance to the point of primary access. This includes Riverwalk 9th, as well as Riverwalk 8th. Todd Whipple, P.E. P1414G - Plan Submittal April3, 1997 Page 3 of 3 Please let us know, in writing, when the other supporting documents for Riverwalk Ist, and the Record Drawings and supporting documents for Riverwalk 2nd, 3rd, and 6th will he submitted; we would also like to know when to expect any Plan Change Requests which may be needed. 1 would appreciate your response by April 9, 1997. If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry, either by letter, or by telephone at 456- 3600. Sincerely, William A. Johns. P.E. Spokane County Engineer EdwarcfJ. Patty, Jr., P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: Project file: P1414. P1414A, P14148, P1414C, P14141), P1414E, P1414F, P14140, P1414H Spokane County Public Works Director: Dennis Scott, P.E. Spokane County Enehteer's Office. Bill Johns. P.E., Bill Hemmings. P.E.. Ed Parry, P.E.. Dean Franz. P.E. Sponsors: Riverwalk 1st. 2nd. 3rd. 4th, 5th: Ed Dean/Mark Hancock, Dean Housley Company, 16720 N.E. 116th Street, Redmond, WA 98052 Riverwalk 6th: Mike Hume, Tomlinson Black North. 8205 North Division. Spokane, WA 99208 Riverwalk 8th Riverwalk 8th: Mike Miller, P.E. /Done Birch, Pacific Properties Incorporated, 14410 Bel -Red Road. Bellevue. WA 98007 Riverwalk 9th: Mike Klicka, P.O. Box 1455, Hayden Lake, ID 83855 P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.Q., phases 1, 2, and 3 Construction Items - Record Drawings and Inspection Reports This list summarizes the Review Comments on the Construction Documents and Record Drawings submitted to date. Refer to the actual Review Comments for specific items Riverwalk lst: 1.Asphalt depth: Credit rec'd from Inland asphalt (per Bill Johns)- No action necessary 2.Concrete gutter depth: Cash payment rec'd from Cameron - No action necessary 3- Excessive accelerator in cross - gutter at Indiana /McMillan: still need mitigation from Winkler (per 24 Feb 97 mtg w/ Dean Hensley Co.)Pending removal & replacement per IPE 28 Mar 97 letter 4. Irrigation systems in swales serving Indiana: still need to be installed, & Record Drawings submitted 5. Need to establish vegetation in all swales E. Pond issues: a. Ponds too deep: IPEC needs to submit plan change showing intended depth of topsoil & sod or ponds need to be constructed per plans or topsoil tests need to be done & results submitted showing compliance to GSM for either organic carbon content or cationic exchange capacity. b. Ponds too shallow: Ponds need to be reconstructed, or IPEC needs to provide plan change requesting revisions, to include talcs c. Pond footprint not per plan: IPEC needs to provide plan change w /talcs showing that the new layout meets GSM reat's or ponds need to be constructed per approved plans Note: 1. IPE's letter of 28 Mar 97 indicates the actions necessary to address some of these issues. 2. Pond calculations need to address all affected elements of the pond design, including but not limited to: 208 volume, total storm volume, 208 depth (floor to rim), depth from normal curb flowline to drywell rim (minimum of 0.4'), etc.,. Field corrective actions also need to consider these elements. 8. Mission /Harmony: Sidewalk was not located per approved plans. Plan Change approved by County Engineer did not indicate an existing utility riser which may interfere with the approved change. Plan Change needs to be revised. IPE to resubmit Plan Change 9. Need to complete any remaining items on IPE's punchlist. When the contractor has corrected all IPE punchlist items, IPE needs to provide written certification of punchlist completion to County Engineer's Office. P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D., phases 1, 2, and 3 Construction Items - Record Drawings and Inspection Reports Riverwalk 2nd: 1. Need to complete IPEC's punchlist When the contractor has corrected all IPE punchlist itemq, IPE needs to provide written certification of punchlist completion to County Engineer's Office. 2. Drywells at Indiana 11 +54 (east end of Riverwalk 1st) will be viewed as part of Riverwalk 2nd, since they receive runoff from swales in Riverwalk 2nd 3. Grates at Indiana 11 +53: Constructed without required sump shown on plans. Need calcs to show that new grate elevations provide adequate inlet capacity, or set grates to plan elevations 4. Need to construct southerly interceptor swale, or adjust onsite drainage swages accordingly 5. Ponds: a. Ponds too deep: IPEC needs to submit plan change showing intended depth of topsoil & sod or ponds need to be constructed per plans or topsoil tests need to be done & results submitted showing compliance to GSM for either organic carbon content or cationic exchange capacity. b. Ponds too shallow: Ponds need to re reconstructed, or IPEC needs to provide plan change requesting revisions, to include calcs c. Pond footprint not per plan: IPEC needs to provide plan change w/calcs showing that the new layout meets GSM regt's or ponds need to be constructed per approved plans See note for this item under 1st Addition 6. Irrigation systems in swales serving Indiana: still need to be installed, & Record Drawings submitted 7. Need to establish vegetation in swales Riverwalk 3rd: 1. Need to complete IPEC's punchlist. When the contractor has corrected all IPE punchlist items, IPE needs to provide written certification of punchlist completion to County Engineer's Office. 2. Ponds: a. Ponds too deep: IPEC needs to submit plan change showing intended depth of topsoil & sod or ponds need to be constructed per plans or topsoil tests need to be done & results submitted showing compliance to GSM for either organic carbon content or cationic exchange capacity. b. Ponds too shallow: Ponds need to re reconstructed, or IPEC needs to provide plan change requesting revisions, to include calcs P1.414 - Riverwalk P.U.D., phases 1, 2, and 3 Construction Items - Record Drawings and Inspection Reports c. Pond footprint not per plan: IPEC needs to provide plan change w /calcs showing that the new layout meets GSM reqt's or ponds need to be constructed per approved plans See note for this item under 1st Addition 3. Irrigation systems in swales serving Indiana: still need to be installed, & Record Drawings submitted 4. Need to establish vegetation in swales March 28, 1997 W.O. 96106 Ed Parry, P.E. Spokane County Engineers 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 Dear Ed, irr INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. RE: P1414 Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Addition RECEIVED MAR 2 8 1997 SPOKANE Cplftyp, ENGINEER As you know we have been continuously gathering information on the roads and drainage facilities of Riverwalk 1". At this time we are submitting the record drawing information for the public and private streets of Riverwalk 1 ". We believe that all public facilities in Riverwalk 1" are ready to be accepted by Spokane County except for the following: 1) The cross - gutter on Indiana across McMillan needs to be reconstructed as redesigned by Inland Pacific Engineering. 2) The sidewalk on Mission Avenue needs to be removed and reconstructed as redesigned by Inland Pacific Engineering and accepted by Spokane County. We had previously sent you a record drawing submittal of Riverwalk Is' for the acceptance of Indiana Avenue, and on December 9, 1996, you responded with a letter with your review comments on the 1" submittal. At that time we had only provided you with the Indiana Avenue and had omitted the Mission Avenue and Private Road information. Although, the private road information and construction of drainage ponds and ditches is not complete we are returning the entire record drawing set to you for review. At this time, we are proposing that the County hold the record drawings done to date and as items noted on the attached letter become complete we will check them out and modify them. We feel that this will be the easiest way for the County to have control of the mylars and be informed as to the status of the construction items. Below, we have attempted to address your comments in the same order you commented, your comments are noted in italics with the respond in bold. General 1. Pond bottom dimensions have been added to the pond details on the supplemental sheet. Sheet 2 : Indian Avenue 1. Callouts to the supplernental sheets should be provided for those items shown as deleted Noted. 707 west 7[11 • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509 -458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 53814 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 Spokane County March 28, 1997 Page 2 2. Why were the pedestrian curb ramps not installed? These items are required. These were initially not installed due to the Barker Road widening project being submitted the week of January 20th, 1997. The curb ramps should be deleted from the Riverwalk 1st plan set as they will be installed with the Barker Road improvement project being constructed by Pacific Properties as a part of Riverwalk 7th. 3. Pond A a) Calculations are needed to show the pipe is adequate Hydraulic calculations are included to show that the pipe is adequate. b) Drywell grate is more than 0.5; above the swale floor (23.52). This swale floor elevation is not correct. However, the drywell grate should actually be raised to elev. 2024.94 (pond bottom approximately= 2024.44). Please see attached letter. c) "End Pond" station is deleted. "End Pond" station has been added to the supplemental sheet. 4. Pond FJ a) Drywell under sidewalk. A solid locking cover over the drywell needs to be installed at the sidewalk elevation so that the drywell can be cleaned. The grate over the inlet in the ditch needs to be replaced with a solid cover. At this time the drywell has been raised, and the contractor is waiting for the weather to warm up in order to pour the new sidewalk section around the rim. b) Catch basin rim only provides 0.35' depth. The catch basin rim should be raised from elevation 2027.70 to elevation 2027.85 (pond bottom approximately= 2027.35) c) Need pipe calculations. Hydraulic calculations are no longer needed. After the revisions, the only functioning pipe is from the inlet within the pond to the drywell. 5. Was a plan change /design deviation processed to delete the curb returns for the extension of Harmony Lane north of Indiana? Todd Whipple 's fax (dated 21 ,July 95) indicates that North Idaho Engineers would be responsible for revising the project tnylars on file at the County. The County has not received a plan change request for this item to date. This item was changed per the revised preliminary plat when the overall preliminary plat was revised in May, 1995 with the preliminary plat of record. We believe that no plan change is required due to the status of the record drawings showing that it has been removed and that it is not consistent with either the preliminary plat of record or the filed and recorded final plat for Riverwalk 1st Addition. Spokane County March 28, 1997 Page 3 6. Was the sidewalk constructed through the deleted entry of Harmony Lane north of Indiana? The sidewalk is drawn as constructed on the mylar and is shown on the supplemental sheet. We will call out see supplemental sheet on the mylar. 7.MCR elevation indicated at the west quadrant of Harmony /Indiana causes a sump condition at the curb ramp. The survey shots are taken at the actual TOC at the ramp location. Therefore, the flow elevations around the ramp are 28.59, 28.46, and 28.27; therefore, no ponding of water takes place and continuous flow exists around the intersection. This has been clarified on the drawings. &Pond 13 a) Rim elevation on mylar needs to be coordinated with supplemental sheet. The drywell rim elevation (2028.62) on the supplemental sheet has been corrected to coordinate with the elevation on the original mylar. b) Drywell is more than 8' from the curb line. Although the offset is more than W from the curb, County Maintenance can maintain this drywell. 9. Pond C a) Rim provides 0.65' depth over floor elevation. Organic carbon testing is required. The drywell rim elevation in Pond C is at 2027.78 and the pond floor elevation has an approximate elevation of 2027.21. Organic Carbon Testing has been performed. The soil contains 4.48% organic matter and a 20.7 cation exchange capacity, passing the minimum requirements. b) Easement dimensions needs to be shown on the revised detail. This pond has not had easement revisions and consequently the easement should not need to be dimensioned on the detail page. The casement dimensions for all ponds can be obtained from the plat. 10. Pond M a) Were the floor and rim elevations constructed in accordance with the accepted plans? This pond was not constructed in accordance with the accepted plans due to a number of circumstances. The configuration shown on the Supplemental sheet has been dimensioned and is correct. Organic Carbon Testing has been performed. The soil contains 4.93% organic matter and a 22.9 cation exchange capacity, passing the minimum requirements. Spokane County March 28, 1997 Page 4 b) Details of the Keystone block wall were not received. A plan change was not processed. Keystone walls less than 4' do not require details and can be installed under manufacturers recommendations. Please note that the dimensions on the wall enclosed does not exceed 2.69' in height. This wall was constructed by a landscaper during pond reconfiguration. IPEC did not request construction of the wall and assumes no liability regarding its design and construction and must fall back on the manufacturer recommendations. The only thing we are prepared to do is obtain certification from the landscaper that the wall was built per manufacturer's recommendations. 11. Pond N This is a private facility and was designed to only collect stormwater from McMillan Lane. This pond requires some correction as described in the attached letter. 12. Was the concrete cross- gutter ever installed? The cross - gutter has been installed but failed the flow test. It needs to be removed and reconstructed as designed by Inland Pacific Engineering. 13. The MCR at Indiana & McMillan indicates a break line would cause runofffrom McMillan follow south and into Pond N. Pond N is a private facility designed to only collect stormwater from McMillan Lane as designed. Stormwater from Indiana Avenue should flow through the cross - gutter and to a pond on Indiana within Rivenvalk 2nd. 14. Sprinkler Systems on Indiana Dean Housley has been reminded that the sprinkler systems must be installed. 15. Pond D and Pond E are located in Riverwalk 2'"' and identified as Pond "A" and Pond "C" respectively. These require sodding and irrigation prior to acceptance. The drywells in these ponds will not be accepted as part of Riverwalk Noted. Spokane County March 28, 1997 Page 5 There are a number items pertaining to private roads and drainage facilities that require attention. These items have been incorporated into a letter describing what needs to be done so that the private facilities of Riverwalk 1 g can be in conformance with the plans. A copy of the packet containing the letter and drawings is attached. Sint rely, lnladd Pacific odd R. Whipple ? e E gineering, In TRW /trw /jdp Enc.- original mylars, record drawing mylars, two sets of prints, supporting soil testing information, mist. calculations cc: Mark Hancock, Dean Housley Company file SOIL CHEMICAL ANALYSES DEPTH FOOT %pi MOISTURE NITROGEN Sutler S pPm Organc Matter Phdspm hous P Perm Potassium X Ppm Calcium Ca Maeslir pn Mg Sodium Na Total Bases me Extango f+reoti Percent Base Saturation now C•C.dh' e.W.u. �� ' NO3 Pawn NO3 NH4 LS. Per Acre Per® nt Me Aa.c bon. a n .a we aerton.M1 mop per 100 prang i 4.48 20.7 0 2 3 4 5 MINOR ELEMENT ANALYSIS DEPTH FOOT pH Saleable San nett osrcm Boron B Zinc Zn Manganese Mn Copper Cu Iron Fe EHorvosenco with ace Parts Per Milan • rpm TOTAL 0.00 0 0 1 Estimated Nitrogen R lease Estimated Total Nitrogen Iran Organic Matter: Avalable to Crop: Last Yeats Crop: 2 3 Field No.: Feat lxec Comments and Recommendations: NORTHWEST 'Eiacl un/ an2GUewus' 2545 West Falls • Kennewick, WA 99336 (509) 783 -7450 FAX (509) 783 -5305 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 W 7TH AVE SUITE 200 SPOKANE, WA Field Nano: Pond C Crop Year: 9055 REPORT NO.: Grower: Sampa: Crop to be Grown: Date Recieved and/or Sampled: 2/19/97 6226 — Page 1 of 2 Fieie Goa: Northwest Agricultu at Con ultants, Inc. SOIL CHEMICAL ANALY FO ww.. FOOT SOIL MOISTURE NITROGEN Staler 5 PPM Orgenk Manor Percent Phosphorous P PP potassium x P 11111 P1 1111 Oaldum Ca Magneslun' Mg Sodium Na Total Total Bases Cal Exchange Caoackv Peipem Base Saturation wm Few FApryy a TN totes NO S PPM NO3 NI aces% garponato Acts aurmn meg. per 1 grarriS Ors. Per Acre 1 4.93 22.9 0 2 3 4 5 MINOR ELEMENT ANALYSIS DEPTH FOOT Pal Suluable a � Boron 8 Zn Manganese Mn Copper Cu Iron Fe Effervescence Effeer rich Bid 6 Parts Per MMOP - ppm T °TAE 0.00 0 0 1 2 - Estimated Nitrogen Release Estimated Total Nitrogen ItomOrganic Matter: Available to Crop: Last Yeae& Crop: 3 Field No.: Fertilizer Comments and Recommendations: NORTHWEST ,p/z/ 63oasakarc 2595 West Falls • Kennewick, WA 99336 (509) 783-7450 FAX (509) 783 -5305 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 W 7TH AVE SUITE 200 SPOKANE, WR Field N ame: Pond a Crop Year: 9 35 REPORT NO.: Groner: Sarrpbc. Crop la be Gruen: Dale Rectoved endlor Sanpbd: 2/19/97 6226 — Page 2 of Yield Goal: Nort west Agricultural Cons - lants, Inc. &‘o = 1-02 �5 &s = 1. Th cCs 2000 tomA. +pc - 1000 BOO - 600 - `00 - 400 300 200 N - u - • -100 Z_ W — ..• n o -60 N' ` W 0 -10 - -6 - 120 IOB 2 0 x • • UuniMU Or PUOtC •U.OS •••• . 1963 • 6 -50 • — Y "4 S lop. to SUOVCMCCO OUTLET cUV4Mp llpwMp lull : Mw • n. b —LSO Fee wU.r cm... nm submerged, corps. MW by ••1•o6• e.•c,Wa . u. 6.nw woc.a.r. 60 0 Figure 20 x Sheet 1 of 2 10 2 4 5 t • 8 • 0 o 'a 10 20 G -0.i -e Ck.q n20 2s, t ?o 1nvex-i- > 202_4 OA I. 7S — , 80 l . 95 , 76 0 k, HEAD FOR CONCRETE PIPE CULVERTS FLOWING FULL n 0.012 ,JDP /jp Mark•I- Iancocka: c /o; Dean Ilotislcy Company 16720 N.E..116t St: 4 .r Redmond OVA 98052 OGIti SPih 1t�L5u" 12h: Rn crwalk Cross Gutter, Indiana and McMillan, Ed Parry, Spokane'County-, 707 West 7t12 . Su iet200 � .:.: 7Spokeee WA 99204: •;509; 458- 6840':.FAX: - 509- 458 •6844 i.Dear Marl (fin Friday March 14 -1997, Johii McKervey and I' did a flow test on the cross gutter along:' Indiana Avenue where it crosses' McMillan Lane :1'he. cross - gutter did not pass the flow test., As'_ ; water ran along Indiana, and entered;the cross - gutter water. began tollow across McMillan: Lane; • "however, the, water wouild notstay fully contained tvithm the cross- gutter Some water flowed:- out (southward) about the center of the cross'gutter and then't ould flow towardslhe'pond - on the, southwest corner offthe intersection (Pond M):' Some water- did make it:through the cross- gutter to the other side of,MeMillan lane, butthen wouldalo«,into pond'located at the southeast corner of the intersection ( Pond N) See attached diagram, for HOW .anal} sis overall • approximately 30 %of the flow: rreached its destination As dcsigne d, the flow was intended to cross McMillan Lanc completely .. and flow'to Pond C in lti•'veryalk 2nd Addition: 1 he cross gutter Will needto bereplaced prior,to approval to and.by . :Spokane County: "'Please call '.me.at(509)458- 6840,wilh'anp questions:` Sincerely 9 :Inland Pacific- Engineering,;Ihc.".; 2020 Lake' ood Drive •• Suite. 205 " Coeurd'Alen . ID'83814 _' • .'208 -7 65 -7784 •FAX: 208 -769- 7277 -r;, J CROSS - GUTTER FLOW PATHS 22 +80.53 MCMILLAN LANE / / / O %1 z . \ <- \ // \ \ \ \ �S \ \ \ \ , % . � \ \ \ \ \ 7 / / / / i DEAN HOUSLEY COMPANY December 30. 1996 Mr. William A. Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 RE: P1=11-I - Rivenvalk P.U.D., Phase I - Indiana Cross -Gutter Work Dear Mr. Johns: This letter is in response to your letter of December 16, 1996 regarding the cross - gutter installation at Riverwalk. We apologize for the mistakes that were made in the completion of this work. In our eagerness to complete the lst Addition "loose ends" we made assumptions that were not correct. Since the cross -gutter was shown on the original North Idaho Engineering drawings approved by the County (with recent additional details for construction by IPE), we didn't focus on the fact that we were using a different concrete contractor for the work than the one used for the earlier lst Addition work. We have always tried to use reputable contractors that are knowledgeable and well versed in Spokane County standards and construction practices, as that makes life easier for both the County and for us. In this case I gather the contractor both didn't get a permit, nor contact the County regarding the accelerating agent prior to the work as they should have (and used I /2% more than is normally approved). As for a plan to avoid these mistakes in the future, we will certainly work more closely with contractors and the engineer both as regards the permits and the actual work itself. I am personally spending more time in Spokane as well while we work to complete the 1st Addition items, and will work closer with Ed Parry and Terry Lightfoot who have been most helpful in helping me understand and work through the issues. Regarding a mitigating measure for the non - compliant concrete work, could you please send me a copy of the County rules that applied to that situation so I can use it in working with the contractor to make a proposal to you. Thank you very much for your help and continued understanding as we clean up the Rivenvalk 1st Addition work. Sincerely, Mark B. Hancock Land Development Manager cc: Bill Hemmings, Ed Parry, Terry Lightfoot, Todd Whipple, Verne Jacobsen 16720 N.E. I loth Street • Redmond, Washington • 98052 • 206.869.6618. Fax 206.869.6620 D E D I C•A E D TO B U I L D I N G QUALITY H O M E S A N D C O M M U N I T I E S MAR 07 '97 07:38 P.1 DATE: (ands ` 1 1 TO: nnnhk. K. C. CONSTRUCTION, INC COMPANY: jt as ADDED COMMENTS: Thank You, 1 P.O. Box 1455 W. 2025 Dakota Ave. Hayden Lake, ID 83835 -1455 TELECOPIER COVER LETTER 208 765 - 3909 (FAX NO. 208-772-2517) FAX NUMBER: (anti) - (4.04) TOTAL NO. OF PAGES: a INCLUDING THIS COVER LETTER. If you do not receive all of the pages, please contact me immediately at (208) 765 -3909, MAR 07 '97 07:38 PHONE (SOY) 536267 FAX (308} 3369787 Inland Asphalt Company . 5111 E. BROADWAY • P.O. BOX 3388 • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 992203388 February 27, 1997 Mr. Mike Klika K.C. Construction P.O. Box 1455 Hayden, ID 83835 Re: Riverwalk 1st Addition SINCE 1934 P.2 CONTRACTOR REGtSTRSTION 1iIFU-NA - Dear Mike: We acknowledge receipt of Inland Pacific Engineering's November 1, 1996, correspondence to Spokane County that was delivered to us on February 25, 1997, prior to the 1:30 p.m. meeting with Spokane County. Dave Murphy and Walt McKinney of Inland Asphalt attended the 2/25/97 meeting with Spokane County where they stated, in your absence, that the paving on this project was completed in 1995 and questioned what relevance the test data has two years later. The grading and paving was inspected at the time of installation and was no doubt accepted by the time of final project payment to Inland in 1998. Any attempt to now seek retribution for apparent insufficient core depth seems very untimely. Sincerely, INLAND ASP OMPANY Randy Wild Vice President REW /df cc: Dave Murphy Walt McKinney irC INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Telephone - (509) 458-6840 FAX - (509) 458-6844 • NOTES: T6'd 4/2,2-A7 • DATE: Mark 4 9 1 0M C A • TO: Dan h4i ly • COMPANY: J2) t69 - ,2 b AX NUM t h 1 tea Ptre • FROM: • NUMBER OF PAGES: J08 NUMBER INCL COVER PAGE nevrea M sS . 4 i-l-tinmemy , bu CA.v► skint 'Le ds Oltstir Ks &T w& 44 � � yam. &nvt ��e_ v p sL k ame_ f (Arno rr . FAX TRANSMISSIONR ON3 DIdIDtld QNFi1NI 6T:PT L66T- ZZ -21dU TO: ATTENTION: 7(,(1 Description No. Copies cc: I - INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPAW 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -NAV 1 4 1996 kaALL I PE I Rf Xerox Prints in Copy of Letter C Original Drawing fl Contract Documents 0 Work Authorization 0 Report Description SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER DATE: I.P.E. PROJECT #• PROJECT NAME 11-14119 q 10(e P1 O a Purpo:. P Infor. O Writte Remarks zpcc 6 . $r!!¢hk.&. $ atk Q2 / yk(.i aO dose (dl b(t to else& (k0in✓rc I' NAT cay6 fit. ,c ru.x ri /1447 444 fini7 tiq h» vs A h:3cw✓J Signed DITRNSMT.PMS r • A ro w L s sir i i S P O K A N E ;;';,, -_, ' Nm o u N T Y. December 9, 1996 Todd Whipple, P.E. Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc., SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Addition Construction Documentation: 1st Submittal Gentlemen: DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. johns, P.E., County Engineer • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director We have reviewed your recent submittal for this project; we are unable to accept the submittal at this time. A list of items needing attention is enclosed, and are indicated in red on the attached print. We note that may of the plan sheets for this project were not included with this submittal; Janelle Poe of your office indicated that the work on those facilities was not completed. Please ensure that the necessary corrections have been completed prior to the next submittal, and that a complete set of plans is submitted; incomplete submittals will not be accepted for review. A Joint Final Inspection for acceptance of the facilities by the County will not be conducted until all deficiencies indicated in the Construction Documentation are corrected. If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, William A. Johns, P. E. Spokane County Engineer Edward J. P a?E y Ir., P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: project file reviewer Dean Housely Company (Mark Hancock) 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 SUBMITTAL #: 1 (Record Drawings) REVIEWER: Ed Parry PROJECT #: P1414 PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk 1st Addition REVIEW COMMENTS SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING & ROADS 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260 -0710 PHONE (509)456 -3600 FAX (509)324 -3478 DATE: 9 December 96 GENERAL ITEMS: 1. Plan changes, approved by the County Engineer, for work not in conformance to the accepted plans, were not received with this submittal. Plan changes were not processed prior to field implementation, as required by the Standards 2. As- constructed floor dimensions were not provided for ponds varying from the accepted plans 3. Have all punchlist items identified by the Construction Engineer been completed? 4. Plans submitted for Record Drawings need to bear the label "Record Drawing ", per section 9.10 of the Standards Sheet 1: Cover Sheet /Index - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County Sheet 2: Indiana Avenue 1. Callouts to the supplemental sheets should be provided for those items shown as deleted 2. Why were the pedestrian curb ramps not installed? These items are required 3. Pond A a. Pipe invert is in a sump below the swale floor. Calculations to show that the pipe is hydraulically adequate (i.e., at least 75' clearance is provided between the water surface elevation at the upstream end of the pipe and the grate elevation) were not received with this submittal b. Drywell grate (1 +16 RT, elevation 24.75):.is - much, more than .5' above the swale floor elevation (23.52) and even exceeds the 8" maximum allowed for this drainage concept, if tests for organic carbon content had been provided c. "End Pond" station is deleted. What station does the pond end at? REVIEW COMMENTS 9 December 96 PROJECT # P1414 - Record Drawings SUBMITTAL # 1 Page 2 of 6 4. Pond F a. Drywell under sidewalk (Harmony Lane 4 +90 LT): Has a solid locking cover, set at the sidewalk elevation, been provided so that the drywell can be cleaned? b. Catch basin rim elevation (27.70) only provides .35' average depth over the swale floor. This is less than the .5' minimum noted in the Dec 85 amendment to the GSM c. The constructed pipe length is shorter than designed. Does this provide adequate headspace between the water surface elevation and the rim elevation at the catch basin? 5. Was a plan change /design deviation processed to delete the curb returns for the extension of Harmony Lane north of Indiana? Todd Whipple's fax (dated 21 July 95) indicates that North Idaho Engineers would be responsible for revising the project mylars on file at the County. The County has not received a plan change request for this item to date. 6. Was the sidewalk constructed through the deleted entry of Harmony Lane north of Indiana? 7. MCR elevation indicated at the west quadrant of Harmony /Indiana causes a sump condition at the curb ramp 8. Pond B a. Rim elevation on drywell (28.62) needs to be coordinated with elevation shown on sheet 2S (28.68) b. Drywell at Indiana 5 +60/29.5'LT is more than 8' from the curb line. County Maintenance crews will be able to maintain this drywell 9. Pond C a. Rim elevation (27.78) provides .65' depth over floor elevation (27.13). Test results indicating that the topsoil contains at least the minimum specified organic carbon were not included with this submittal b. Easement dimensions need to be shown on the revised detail 10. Pond M a. Were the floor and rim elevations constructed in accordance with the accepted plans? b. Details (section and elevation views) of the Keystone block wall were not received with submittal. A plan change for this configuration has not been processed through the County Engineer's Office 11. Pond N a. Rim elevation (27.11) provides .66' depth over floor elevation (26.45). Test results indicating that the topsoil contains at least the minimum specified organic carbon were not included with this submittal REVIEW COMMENTS 9 December 96 PROJECT # P1414 - Record Drawings SUBMITTAL # 1 Page 3 of 6 b. Was the invert elevation of the roadside ditch checked? Does it provide at least 6" for water quality treatment before water enters the drywell? c. Was the pipe connecting the drainage structures checked for conformance to the accepted plans? 12. Was the concrete cross -gutter installed at Indiana /McMillan? How can the gutter function as designed if elevation at the middle of the curb return (MCR) (27.60) is so much lower than the flowline of the cross - gutter (27.76)? If the cross -gutter had not been installed at the time the Record Drawings were submitted, it should not be shown as having been installed. 13. The accepted plans indicated that the MCR at the east side of Indiana /McMillan would act as a break line to cause runoff from McMillan to flow south and into Pond N. The Record Drawings indicate that the drywells at the easterly terminus of Indiana will now receive runoff from an area not considered in the original design. Revised drainage calculations for this condition were not received with this submittal 14. Record Drawings for the sprinkler systems required in the swales serving Indiana Avenue were not received with this submittal. Sprinkler system callout is noted at Plan Revision #1 (Jul 95) on the accepted plans. Were the systems installed? 15. Pond D, Pond E: These are located in Riverwalk 2nd Addition, and are identified as Pond "A" and Pond "C" respectively. The Record Drawings (Sheet 5R) for that project state that the sod and irrigation systems for those ponds had not been installed as of 29 Oct 96; the Record Drawings were submitted on 1 Nov 96. The swales, catch basins, drywells and pipes composing these facilities will also need to be completed, and Record Drawings (including the irrigation systems) submitted, prior to the acceptance of Indiana Avenue east of the plat boundary of Riverwalk 1st Addition. Acceptance of any road /drainage improvements in Riverwalk 1st Addition will not include the drywells at Station 11 +54 (LT & RT). The following comments pertain to private roads or facilities serving private roads. The Record Drawings for these improvements will be kept on file at the County as a part of the public record for this project. Since the County does not bear any responsibility or liability in connection with private road and drainage improvements, the Developer is solely responsible for correcting the items noted and revising the Record Drawings, or not. Unless otherwise noted, acceptance of public roads, and drainage facilities serving public roads, will not be dependent upon correction of the following items. Sheet 3: Harmony Lane 1. Entry at west side of Mission Avenue was not constructed in accordance with the accepted plans; this item was identified to IPEC and the Developer in the summer of 1996. A plan change for this condition was not submitted until the Construction Documents were received at the County Engineer's REVIEW COMMENTS 9 December 96 PROJECT # P1414 - Record Drawings SUBMITTAL II 1 Page 4 of 6 Office on 1 Nov 96. Calculations demonstrating how adequate stormwater management will be provided were not received with that plan change request. Preliminary comments on this plan change were provided to IPEC on 2 Dec 96. The plan change must be approved by the County Engineer's Office, and the work completed, prior to the County Engineer's acceptance of Mission Avenue. 2. Pond L: Rim elevation (32.46) provides .66' depth over floor elevation (31.72). Test results indicating that the topsoil contains at least the minimum specified organic carbon were not included with this submittal 3. Pond K a. There appears to be a 0.2' difference in the floor elevations (plan view vs. details) on the accepted plans. Was the floor elevation on this pond checked? If so, what is the as- constructed floor elevation? The best case results in a 1.9' depth between the rim and pond floor; maximum allowed is .66' (if the topsoil contains the minimum specified amount of organic carbon). b. The drywell at 13 +96.13 is 3' closer to the road than designed. What sort of safety /stability issues does this cause? A type R curb is considered to be a mountable curb, and is not considered to provide adequate protection from damage due to collision with roadside facilities, or due to a vehicle running off the road, as does a type A curb. c. How did the Basin K dimensions change so as to provide only 389 ft for 208 volume? The calcs indicate that these dimensions would provide —1140 fP for water quality treatment at .5' depth. 4. Pond J a. Sheet 9B: The location of the 27.94 elevation is not clear between the plan view and the section view. The section view would indicate that the drywell at 16 +05 is below the pond floor, and that a depth of .5' is not provided between the pond floor (27.94) and the drywell rim at 15 +75 (28.11). b. Rim elevation of drywell at 16 +69 (28.44) provides more that the .66' max. allowed depth over the swale floor (27.41) c. The CL offset of the drywell at 16 +69 needs to be clarified - a 0.74' offset puts the drywell just off the street centerline 5. Were ponds I1, I2 and 13 checked? 6. Pond G: Rim elevation (27.77) provides .67' depth- over floor elevation (27.10). Test results indicating that the topsoil contains at least the minimum specified organic carbon were not included with this submittal Sheet 4: Baldwin Lane /Augusta Lane - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County REVIEW COMMENTS 9 December 96 PROJECT # P1414 Record Drawings SUBMITTAL # 1 Sheet 5: McMillan Lane No comments at this time Page 5 of 6 Sheet 6: Barker Road (14 +50 to 24 +00) - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County Sheet 7: Mission Avenue (10 +00 to 19 +00) - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County Sheet 8: Details - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County Sheet 9: Details - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County Sheet 9A 1. Pond H: Rim elevation (27.73) provides .63' depth over floor elevation (27.10). Test results indicating that the topsoil contains at least the minimum specified organic carbon were not included with this submittal 2. Was the invert elevation of the roadside ditch checked? Does it provide at least 6" for water quality treatment before water enters the drywell? If more than 6" depth is provided, does the topsoil contain at least the minimum specified amount of organic carbon? Max. depth is 8" from rim to ditch invert Sheet 9B 1. Basin 0: The plans for McMillan Lane indicate that a catch basin and drywell were installed at this pond; this was not indicated on the plans accepted for construction. Detail needs to be coordinated with the plans 2. Was basin P checked? Sheet 9C: Sight Distances - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County • REVIEW COMMENTS 9 December 96 PROJECT // P1414 - Record Drawings SUBMITTAL # 1 Sheet 1S 1. Concrete core H/8 is not indicated on the map Page 6 of 6 2. The thickness of asphalt core #4 in Table 1 of the report has been coordinated with the data in Gifford's report, per Ed Parry's telephone conversation with Todd Whipple on 4 Dec 96 Sheet 2S 1. Rim elevation for drywell in Pond B needs to be coordinated with the elevation shown on Sheet 2 ATTENTION: Ed Parry Description No. Copies 1 Purpose 0 Information Written Approval Remarks ire INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -6844 TO: Spokane County Engineers 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 0 Xerox Prints fl Copy of Letter Original Drawing fl Contract Documents O Work Authorization IN Report Signe` cc: Stan on Development Description Daily Inspection Reports (/1 and 10 -16 -96 and 10- 17 -96. DATE: October 25, 1996 I.P.E. PROJECT #• PROJECT NAME: 96106,) Riverwalk 1st Construction Inspection B ECF.1v E otl 7.8 V996 KpNE COUNIV ENGINEER #2 dat&?o Review & Comments O Per Your Request 0 Signature & Return D: \TPNSMT.PMS INLAND ir mpl PACIFIC Ms ENGINEERING Date Arrival Ti e Weather Client General Contractor Oar C w ccYr tils C 4-0_15 Subcontractor (, AMe,`on 47 /-,)�.tc [a,,c(sca�z ,�oA n //12/0, y IPE FIELD REPRESENTAT W E CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER Corresponding Deficiency Report No AL-€.04)' z T DAILY FIELD REPORT Inspector's Daily Report No.: , IPE Project No.: Page No. / 76/ IPE Field Representative Local Representative/ phone number Site Representative/ phone number 1 IPE Project Manager/ phone n mber ,z /�/ 4a V ys� 4-4W Manpower & Equipment Used ,an 1 ,4 s M - Mo n = . Trvren AX 1/' T / 'r / t,cL.4 h,Psro p er c / /1 ` vim / �RfAi/ lAa ('tl�'ln•LP /[ —' / (� KC. % ry, /HC: 2n- .Lyait ( p,1- /.Q itch r_ 44-n fc – /1"'W (AI 79j9 , /I/'i, /n /p ry Pla/f ea e Comments: , / /`e /_ ,4 o sp,' ' T�C- (WO Completed Apparently l/ ( -e PitrP /a /` d v/ J! T ° Specifications Problems L / -/- / their Solutions) /'t'p /0 ACih�, G/4 % O I f /C-6 G{ /O Orl 01 (j / q 5.2- ,OO VJ„/ /yZc d /i.e. a / /a S I/ifJ.42.,/ GtJ c 0 on.5, ,76.7r, C, O H-7, rc vt Co n Gn LCJ CI 5 /' P / d R r / vt J 7 /a art; C ✓ ,J/ .• a 4.AHq 2.nMial�ct /�,P 5 a✓ &/ /et/ art; 7jn G�,rc ? /'Ati /f J /Gc / Wa / ��� ,c_ /7/ r /J c f// r /, l l.) c- p, o / / U ri , se' za,,, a diG-i'" � e et -4, ' G' rn x /`vvt ,4. . r / oJ-, n+ i'A. 7 ‘) r a /' r to /tpcJ ter, r& sect; G/4/, CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer and /or IPE project manager. / Date �41') Date 0 71 INLAND MI PACIFIC ENGINEERING IPE Project No. Comments: (Work Completed Apparently per Specifications Problems and their Solutions) 6 ® ! 7 /oc Non - Conforming Items: (Projector Standard Specification Observed Construction Is In Non - Compliance with) IPE Feild Rep /e-Itter Ltlo ik 72 cfi /7e; f Inspector's Daily Report No.: Page No. of ps /roo,e n' / /t3y ,e ,2'7 67 er ree rtes -7 e A a e2 /1/ / r- ,o P ( ,na el.),-e e / v, r /-r rip fr it S/) Aen°eti / rm- t // siG7f'_cjeA -e, ratA. S ;66-14 t eei -)9,2p As he , T!-e in co v C ed � t11 r e n I; am , / .sic.' t }etaI /< (4); 64.k, /e,- ,, r it et LiC ,( Au'(6tte_ / ran-' ( ( ' - e � ` ✓ry . / i% d i r r C. ct. ten s' 2 .�/yy r, 0..ma 2 al Tie_ 5tA) Gd - r' h't.Q•i D ( Tin < i Gt ',tot Tom. ('/ Gt 0 Li ey_e - P a , � -� f J 4 7 7-l_ nio t pi e sAirr,4 c IPE CE IPE PM DAILY FIELD REPORT & / /ZOA J v% / /r, y9 7i / ✓)/ Pi /11,`,/,11/7/€4. Gl i Contractor's Rep ' INLAND as PACIFIC ENGINEERING r r rQ4k Zs Date � Inspector's Daily Report No.: /7 O IPE Protect No.: 2( n L 3r a,� Q � Arrival Time J9 J 0 ( rr b , �5 Weather Client General Contractor Page No. / Local Representative/ phone number Site Representative/ phone number DAILY FIELD REPORT Subcontractor A IPE Pro c M n er/ number on nu 5rt ,//--Ak s ia_ )7-- . ��l Oti recto IPE Field Representative c .1056/24,-P7 Manpower & E qu Used f Pn.Gcsnr,, tilAcilentifri - / cest75'JB Comments: / a � �� ork Completed Apparently ale 7- 7"4 - /J �--� S/ at y s PritP Specifications Problems their Solutions) 1 7—.4. / rt /Y/�!– ,`r a/> -bis � ,POne 4i • /c , / Q 74 �W (1�Y l 4- 1`= �G rt Ati- et Gti+.ee' a // /(/.t-H • )4.4. /n,f e 4/'.^i1. -ems ovt s / r4e_ !&✓w► Ate/ M kt zeaG► T M-roj /t,oj vi s •-,Z Le��, -t y 4/o Arcik 4?ea5twfe 6tfe 0 / The / QST .�aP� / ,ls- Aa �r Se N A y d- 3 r r/P / / �s, �' edic .tle-fc, : sto este4 r /a- komo tile rc Y P rz•w,r+/ ia✓ Slop ieiatodi /etvl / prl''V -/o coMfirt4 IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer and /or IPE project manager. Date 17// 1 E C9IStRUCTION ENGINEER PE PROJE MAN Corresponding Deficiency Report No E - _a � /lit z sj Dat e 1 AG R Ate te k stirc r-g0 2 - /PO )0P? /ictatV 1 ! 4-= Agaaie__scd_eAra-4_d, tbstrndas, ,' ` crco aLik 2 S r — gdoe 4,*»rrtt Z 10-43 /7t6 1 1' *SCC 70!/! Jookitnj s 0 -tATti Ke fs fer- LMt % Se cT`i0 2- 9.9 _- .L/r3C V ` `� v \' sicleu)cfJ< DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • ' A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer October 11. 1996 " Ed Dean Mark Hancock Dean Housley Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond. WA 98052 Dennis M. Scott, P.E.. Director SUBJECT: 1414 - Rivenvalk P.U.D. 1st Addition P1414A - Rivenvalk P.U.D. 2nd Addition P1414B - Rivenvalk P.U.D. 3rd Addition Submittal of Construction Documentation and Record Drawings Gentlemen: We have had several discussions with you and your engineer (Inland Pacific Engineering) over the past 6 months regarding the expected submittal of the Record Drawings and Construction Documentation for these projects. As you will recall, the County's original position was that the Plats of 2nd and 3rd Additions would not receive Final Approval until all the work for Indiana Avenue was completed by your contractor. certified by your engineer. and accepted by the County Engineer's Office. This resulted from your failure to secure a permit for the work in the right of way for Indiana Avenue prior to starting construction. I am concerned that you will be submitting these documents at a point in time when the weather will not allow (a) a proper Final Inspection to take place, and /or (b) corrective action to be properly made on items of deficient work. I need to see a submittal of all the construction documentation. to include certified Record Drawings. no later than 12:00 noon. October 31, 1996. This submittal will need to comply with the requirements of Section 9 of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, as well as the guidance I have provided to your engineer in my earlier discussions and correspondence with them. If this does not occur, I will be forced to take further actions as are necessary to ensure that this material is submitted in a timely fashion: these actions may include revocation of approach permits, restriction of lot building permits, et al... If you have any further questions or comments, please contact me at 456 -3600. Thank you. Sincerely, Willi 1ohn Spokane County ngmeer cc: project file Spokane County Public Works Director: Dennis Scott. P.E. Spokane County Engineer's Office: Bill Hemmings, P.E., Ed Parry. P.E. Spok7026610taitiar asjecUtdr's ®f0'n &0Letege0 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 DATE: It TO: COMPANY: CITY /STATE: Number of Pages (including cover sheet): t' FROM: MESSAGE: FAX COVER SHEET SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE 1026 W. Broadway Avenue, Spokane, WA 99260 Phone: (509) 456 -3600 p -Floor Fax # (509) 324 -7655 Ca t& FAX # 206100 6,62o eD ImAtL (--4 & k t- trat'Le`I But- smss ww.JE ci b ' / U 61(Qbsfkr- Ra-Lak & l 5,41- b AAL October 11, 1996 Ed Dean Mark Hancock Dean Housley Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, WA 98052 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Addition P1414A - Riverwalk P.U.D. 2nd Addition P1414B - Riverwalk P.U.D. 3rd Addition Submittal of Construction Documentation and Record Drawings Gentlemen: We have had several discussions with you and your engineer (Inland Pacific Engineering) over the past 6 months regarding the expected submittal of the Record Drawings and Construction Documentation for these projects. As you will recall, the County's original position was that the Plats of 2nd and 3rd Additions would not receive Final Approval until all the work for Indiana Avenue was completed by your contractor, certified by your engineer, and accepted by the County Engineer's Office. This resulted from your failure to secure a permit for the work in the right of way for Indiana Avenue prior to starting construction. ` —fit_ I am concerned that you will be submitting these documents at a point . " 2r will not allow (a) a proper Final Inspection to take place, and /or (b) corm ° l' r made on hems of deficient work. I need to see a submittal of all the cot » 7, ‘,'to include certified Record Drawings, no later than 12:00 noon, October 31, pig? Ill need to Li comply with the requirements of Section 9 of the Spolcane Coua rod Sewer Construction, as well as the guidance I have provided to your engi . \ cs , .5 t ons and t correspondence with them. If this does not occur, I will be forced to i t essary to ensure that this material is submitted in a timely fashion; these p ion of approach permits, restriction of lot building permits, et al.,. - If you have any further questions or comments, please contact me at 456 -3 sincerely, Willi A. John E. Spokane County Engineer cc: project file Spokane County Public Works Director: Dennis Scott, P.S. Spokane County Engineer's Office: Bill Henunings, P.E.. Ed Parry, P.E. Spokane County Prosecutor's Office: Rob Binger Gentlemen: Sincerely, DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer October 11, 1996 Ed Dean Mark Hancock Dean Housley Company 16720 N.E. 1 16th Street Redmond, WA 98052 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Addition P1414A - Riverwalk P.U.D. 2nd Addition P1414B - Riverwalk P.U.D. 3rd Addition Submittal of Construction Documentation and Record Drawings We have had several discussions with you and your engineer (Inland Pacific Engineering) over the past 6 months regarding the expected submittal of the Record Drawings and Construction Documentation for these projects. As you will recall, the County's original position was that the Plats of 2nd and 3rd Additions would not receive Final Approval until all the work for Indiana Avenue was completed by your contractor, certified by your engineer, and accepted by the County Engineer's Office. This resulted from your failure to secure a permit for the work in the right of way for Indiana Avenue prior to starting construction. 1 am concerned that you will be submitting these documents at a point in time when the weather will not allow (a) a proper Final Inspection to take place, and /or (h) corrective action to he properly made on items of deficient work. I need to see a submittal of all the construction documentation, to include certified Record Drawings, no later than 12:00 noon, October 31, 1996. This submittal will need to comply with the requirements of Section 9 of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, as well as the guidance 1 have provided to your engineer in my earlier discussions and correspondence with them. If this does not occur, I will be forced to take further actions as are necessary to ensure that this material is submitted in a timely fashion; these actions may include revocation of approach permits, restriction of lot building permits, et al.,. If you have any further questions or comments, please contact me at 456 -3600. Thank you. William A. Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director cc: project file Spokane County Public Works Director: Dennis Scott. P.B. Spokane County Engineer's Office: Bill Hemtnings, P.E., Ed Parry, P.E. Spokane County Prosecutor's Office: Rob Binger 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 - 0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD; (509) 324 -3166 Post -it" Fax Note 7671 Data %Y(% Ip4► / To T c /L � ° From MAsK � � co.roeppt fbri uc c a co. Da.( no nay Phone I/ PP1g p /M - W e B Z'�' Fax d Fax 11 _ 09/04/96 11:50 FAX 206 ' 6620 DEAN /EUDSLEY LLC OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Enterprise Bank 11225 S.E. 6th Street Bellevue ,Wa 98004 Dear Sir or Madam: If you RE: Riverwalk 1st Addition P1414 Stanton Development Company D� r MUPD Le )M 'P o SALE t%is .� BE S 'Tnroy 7 fl ASB 'J►tr + ranks 6 twi w ct /rao c a RL tt11rRt istfraubssmAtel A l> We' WOULD tl krTtl (WDUcE 1++s Seril ETU AM INtnusllIO tD( /0 % 7). ' Nimeu4TE 'TtU C MELP. Tibitmles q - q - 16u4C dele.: 11p ,.,. . A DIVISION of THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E, Director 2156,4 los 14 ti 10 ism' /de ebsisk ic-1 JiVP ' 1 Bill Johns, P.E. P144i4 N July 26, 1995 Please be advised that the Set Aside Funds No. 01 402981 issued by your company as surety for installations of roads and associated drainage facilities for the above mentioned plat, dated July 25,1995, in the current amount of 5187,000.00 may now be reduced to 576,700.00 (seventy six thousand seven hundred U.S. dollars). have any questions, feel free to call our office Very truly yours, Spokane County Engineer l aj)a&t David A. Berto Plat Compliance Surveyor .vae .r. oronaway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260.0170 . (509) 4bb -3600 FAX: (509) 324_3478 1-DD; (509) 324 -3166 ®ooi I.P.E. PROJECT ti q(a /Qt' PROJECT NAME P"el C7 TO: ATTENTION: Et Description ri erox Prints MI Original Drawing El Work Authorization No. Copies Purpose Information ED Written Approval Remarks INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPA 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509 $458 cc: post -iN Fax Note 7671 0 Review & Comments Signature & Return ter pike Signed•c i n tdrk o R � nal,w— 7 Per Your Request Tam "rat- itoL --- D.5TR14SMT.PMS f+-O OCT -23 -1996 17:14 INLRND PRCIFIC ENG TO: ATTENTION: GA -P Description 0 Xerox Prints O Copy of-t O Original Drawing _____ El Work Authr - 7571 Pasc " tt � Faxes No. Copies _ ma tit volitast " Purpose � . Y - �-� haw -14; GEM, tate Review & Comments O Per Your Request . Signature & Return O. Information [ 'Written Approval Remarks 4- LeAre_ o- .er e- 11 �.,=nnrk ale�lrtA is -er -ik ck e- ve o-k o.v.0., Vol I;,49.4n \ . __ e_ a ± .S. Silii:sL:__ -- VIN Q e l'.nn Lk! LQ 0. ■. a .s e. ' * . - �, .� a/ • . — (L AL.a_Qti olatto z Q'rt seine Signed' cc: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458.6844 C-6 Eve i re P.01 DATE 0-33 "- So I.P.E. PROJECT #: r. (el PROJECT NAME: ( ( ?„od, 2tcu FA r- A 44%-- t ��- Post-it" Fax No(..Qi/li 671 ,;c4(S Fax ii Damf° 2 77 Ipta os' 3 Co one M Phone 0 Fa. 0 OCT -23 -1996 17:15 SODOM Reif 01140' INLAND PACIFIC ENG Iro p xA AveNUE 3 3. r P.02 porde. KM SAlt tag 3021$1 0t‘ BAsiN IR ∎reed = 331 cu -4. Kw porton apneas • rasi "Vmmt1 1 0 0 4 4 - TOPD bo?iotk Fib s TYPE B CURB & GUTTER BACK OF 6' SIDEWALK RIGHT OF WAY 13' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT KEYSTONE WALL BUILT POND BOTTOM PEDESTRIAN RAMP // / ■••:.� •! / �� ../.? / \ EDGE OF ASPHALT ...e'' i i \ \ ' SPOKE COUNTY STANDARD \ C / i i \ \ TYPE 8 ORYWELLL WITH TYPE 4 �� Y \ MCMIUAN UWEHD CRAZE -" � r r.\ / . 1'' i i DRAINAGE EASEMENT o13 VLA BASIN (POND) M 16' UTILITY & • DRAINAGE EASEMENT REQUIRED '208' POND VOLUME a 331 COST. DESIGNED '208' POND VOLUME - 460 CU.FT. CONSTRUCTED '206' POND VOLUME - 400 CU.FT. SEE DETAIL M OF FINAL PLAT FOR EASEMENT DIMENSIONS SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE A DRYWELL WO. GRATE ELE'V.• PISsEO Enem - l of =Bl m w TO: S vlc £l tAL.i rv'hairs ATTENTION: kd :F aith Description in Xerox Prints Original Drawing n Work Authorization No. Copies Purpose 0 Information E4 ritten Approval Remarks I rZ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPAI S 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509 84$440 _ NT., ENCI , r _ -u-tre --\n€ ,. �� t k -G - *kit. e ckA o+ t -L/) )3 ,/144 (<"t Q ( A (JV n nMz.A , ,wt.SJ c4-k ._ D(ttititiv In Copy of Letter 0 Contract Documents n Report Description Review & Comments Signature & Return (4-t REC.. 1. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Per Your Request . Fnc,/m lad D]TRNSMT.PM5 it SOCKALK RAW d NAY The-ezteoS bt h\cAL Talo ►keter; INDIANA AV11UE Es6.wAV.,NI- Tin 4 PCT HO *Alt ORAlt at! ot BASIN M 1 e a rd =331 cu-C1- paveonominterisarl peseta 7- 41 A4 VOLLIC 'WWII, • 440 cat 10140$OTTOM % ?At sp. TYPE B CURB & GUTTER BACK OF 6' SIDEWALK RIGHT OF WAY 13' UTILITY & -( DRAINAGE EASEMENT \ \ KEYSTONE WALL BUILT POND BOTTOM / DRAINAGE EASEMENT on) n. AT BASIN (POND) M PEDESTRIAN RAMP 16' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT REQUIRED '208' POND VOLUME = 331 CU.FT. DESIGNED '208' POND VOLUME - 460 CU.FT. CONSTRUCTED '208' POND VOLUME n 400 CU.FT. SEE DETAIL M OF FINAL PLAT FOR EASEMENT DIMENSIONS EDGE OF ASPHALT SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE B DRYWELL WITH TYPE 4 METAL FRAME AND GRATE MCMILLAN LANE SPOKANE COUNTY STAN TYPE A DRYWELL WITH LID. GRATE ELEV. -202 Pasco E serswe y loMb 3071 M = e SF OCT -22 -1996 16 28 INLRND PRCIFIC ENG '.01 ir INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Telephone - (509) 458 -6840 FAX - (509) 458-6844 ® NOTES: 4- NUMBER OF PAGES: INCL. COVER PAGE D A III TO: 4 Mea, IVA° 6/A 44 e III CO PANY: 32-4 7le(o FAX NUMBER: Tanelie 1111 i F rid_ IA_ `-'4 eh tn. DAL at I- 4)6(4 eO B NUMBER W e LLLL& acirkfinrn ` i. - R WPX•Wet QL Sot .0ecok fii.r na +L.& . q' AJL_ As0.4 L-as 44%-k altA&A k0cl2.4 j L d+ c \ Y FAX TRANSMISSION OCT -22 -1996 16 29 INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.02 DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOT 9 BLOCK 4 RIYERWALK FIRST ADDITION An easement for drainage over a portion of Lot 9, Block 4, Riverwalk First Addition, as recorded in Book 23 of Plats, Pages 37-40, in the Spokane County Auditor's Office, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 9; thence N.60 °00'02 "E. along the north line thereof a distance of 45.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence S.29 ° 59'58 "E. a distance of 17.00 feet; thence N.60 °00'02 "E. a distance of 30.00 feet; thence N.29 ° 59'58 "W. a distance of 4.00 feet; thence N.60 ° 00'02 "E. a distance of 19.00 feet; thence N.29 °59 "W. a distance of 3.00 feet; thence S.60 °00'02 "W. a distance of 34.00 feet; thence N.29 °59'58 "W. a distance of 10.00 feet; thence S.60 °00'02"W. a distance of 5.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. ■ Eta, kiagAn OCT -22 -1996 16:29 BACK OF 6' SIDEWALK PROPERTY EXIST. 13' UTILRY LINE & DRAINAGE EASMT. PROPERTY UNE oc SCALE: 1" =20' TYPE B CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED EASEMENT LOT 9, BLOCK 4 RIVERWALK 1 ST ADDITION EASEMENT ADJUSTMENT INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.03 INDIANA AVENUE RETAINING WALL n/ -n-_ . n /nn /n c PEDESTRIAN RAMP TRACT "D" POND BOTTOM \ \ N6000'07E • �..,.` . -_.. . \ � ' Z EASEMENT� !9 L N6000'OYE Z 19.04 rn ,r 1460oo•O2 DRYWELL EDGE OF I RIGHT OF WAY 16' UTILRY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT I rel. INLAND riC PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 Sookans. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 OCT -22 -1996 16:30 `l n,j / t0&f' 1n"fv /Qtoj -s ,97,o,9j -oVJ4 m ec) /ylvI, WHEN ItECOIL7ED RETURN TO TRUNKENBQL2 & CARLSON, Ps. 2.12104 NORA BPOKANE, WA 99216 Nlsu 7 ( tj INLAND PRCIFIC EP16 9601090241 STATUTORY {YARRANTY DEED tuE9 na a t,.pau COURTESY OF ` ut t�oN nUE I NSURANCE CO. af 00LSln: �,..—' JaK 9 A `✓aJt.1y0110R7 IL$$, gpaL ►N Slit F1 .. T ANStMERICA TITLL THE ORANTORB, rM TON • 8POKANF )..P a Washington Limited Partnenhip; IN CONSIDERATION of Ten balers end other va aaUe eansidernlicn; In hand pad, convey and warrant to Ci% TLEWOOD ROMES. INC a Washington Corporation; the foUowing described red plate, situated N the County of Spoksne. State of Wmhington: J.ot 8 In Btock 8 and Lot 9 to Bloek 4 and Ls 4 in Elor_k 6 of slrttPBWC 1 K FTtZS'T ADDITION. A PLAN P.O NI Db'Vl? • _ • .•:�: a .hat r000rded in VO1Vme 23 or PIn1% tsexcs 37, 38. is ,9trBJFCT TO: 1. Liobfily for future anessmenle levied by ConsoBdated Irrigation District No. 19. 2. UnbWly for future assessments levied by Spokane county far Storm IYatcr sen•ict. 3. All tovenanla, conditions, restrictions or rnervetions; all easements or other servitudtt rights or benefts which may bo tbovnt on the pkt affecting land outside the bounder)• described above, V any, disclosed by the recorded documents of the plat of Riverwalk First edditlon, A Planned Unit Development. N Volume 23 of Plats, pages 87 • 40. 4. Dectaratton of Covenants and Restrictions imposed by instrument recorded on Msy 20, 1994, wider Recording No. 9405200420. 6. Deelanttkn or Covenants, Condillons and Restrctlons fo. River 1VeJk Imposed by Instrument recorded on Juiy 25, 1996, under Recording No. 9607250312, Ineluding, but not Umited to , UabWly for auenments levied by the community assoeiatlon, and rights or benefit, which may be dbekraed affecting lend outside the boundary deseribed above, 0. Deeiaration of Covenant Imposed by bastrument recorded on July 28, 1995, under Recording No. 9507280118. 7. Agreement and the tern, and conditions thereof recorded July 24, 1905, under Recording No. 9507240089, Regarding Mrtlgatien of student impaet, affecting this and other property. Dated: JANUARY 2, 1996. STANTON • SPOKANE, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY GENERAL PARTNER BY DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION 3 L.G. , 4-- ---_ • 9 600 000 414 E%Che tax raid Qrti, r iv $ale Amt. Pd. (' $pGbjns C 1015 t / RY: EDWARD DEAN, President of Dean BuUding STATE OF WASIUNGTON ) ss County of g,,,r� ) On this dyv penonay appeared before no ED\VMO PF.AN to me known to be the P1E9IDE OF DEAN Rt17LDING CORPORATION. who Js the CenereJ Partner of STANTON • BPORANC LIMITED PART'4E8$I(IP. the Partnership who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary set and decd of acid p rtnenhip. for the uses aid purpoaes therein mentioned and on oath staled that he was authorised to eteeutc the Bald btstrument. J.r..,.•..eS ,95L CIVEN under m Z hand and offrclal aenl lNs flay of fSG B6 -19961- 1-, ss" „ "1-r, ,p dtFCH ., • N fitic u1- end ror the state of r gq } �..`_y �WasNnglorL residing In ay.vn ✓eo0 : p r,- st, t o 'f ,p',1- "'<U�,` `•.. a;:......1-. .. P.04 O 1N. Lc TOTRL P.04 S P O K A N n DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director October 18, 1996 K. C. Construction P.O.Box 1455 Hayden Lake, ID 83835 Att: Mike Klicka Re: Riverwalk PUD Sewer Extension Dear Mike, C O U N T Y Pfrkcl Please be advised that the Construction Division accepts the quality of construction of the following system components: All mainline sewer pipe, manholes, and side- service stub -outs from manhole 6D located in Riverwalk PUD 2nd Addition east to the sewage lift station for the Riverwalk developments. Please note that this area is unpaved at this time. Additional TV inspection will be required if future paving or development takes place above the sewer lines. TV inspection as well as any cleaning or repairs resulting from the future paving will be addressed at the time of the future paving. The above acceptance will allow the Conty Utilities Department to establish a one year warranty period. Utilities will begin this period when all as -built drawings, 0 & M manuals, easements, and other related system components have been satisfactorily provided. Any additional defects observed in the system during the warranty period will be brought to your attention by the Spokane County Utilities Department. Very Trulx Y James Radke, P.E. Construction Engineer 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3475 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 • MEMBER A yS ® ® AME∎ C?N SOCIETY FOR CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION July 29, 1996 Page 1 of 2 To : K.C. CONSTRUCTION PO Box 1455 Hayden Lake, ID 83835 -1455 (208) 765 -3909 Fax# 772 -2517 ATTN: Mr. Mike Mika Re: Riverwalk 1" Addition (P -1414) Curb & Sidewalk Coring results. Cameron Contracting, Inc. W. 3309 BISMARK SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99205 (509) 466 -5555 FAX (509) 327 -9210 WA CONTRACTORS LIC #CAMERCI1210G ID CONTRACTOR'S LIC#12153-C-4(9) Dear Mike, I am in receipt of I.P.E.C.'s letter dated 16 July 1996 and the results of the concrete coring performed by Gifford Consultants and Spokane Concrete Coring. After close review of the findings, Cameron Contracting proposes the following remedy: Remove the sidewalk at cores C & K, approximately 10 lineal feet in each direction. We feel that these thin areas are isolated. Cameron Contracting proposes a rebate to Spokane County for the cost of the concrete in the other areas, including the Gutter Section. The sidewalk and curb & gutter in question has been in -place for approximately one year. Proving that the product is sound and durable. The compressive strength tests taken show that the sidewalk strength is almost double of that required. The average strength of the curb & gutter section is over two and one -half times the required strength. Average sidewalk depth without cores C & K is 3.84375 inches. The sidewalk in place is .15625 inches shy of the required 4 inches. There is 2,100 L.F. of sidewalk that is in question. Therefore 2,100 L.F. X 6 L.F. X .15625 inches equals 164 cubic feet. There is 27 cubic feet per cubic yard of concrete, therefore 164 divided by 27 = 6.07 cubic yards. Concrete at 550.00 per cubic yard multiplied by 6.07 cubic yards equals 5303.50. at Page 2 of 2 The average depth of the gutter section is 5.13 inches, the requirement is 6 inches. The gutter section in place is .87 inches shy of the requirement. The gutter section is 18 inches wide. There is 2,100 L.F. of gutter in question, therefore 18 inches X 2,100 L.F. X .87 inches is equal to 228.375 cubic feet, therefore 228.375 cubic feet divided by 27 cubic feet per cubic yard equals 8.4583 cubic yards of concrete at $50.00 per cubic yard equals $422.92. Enclosed please find a check reflecting this credit; Sidewalk credit = $ 303.50 Gutter credit = $ 422.92 Total credit = $726.42 CCI Ck# 13588 dated 07/26/96 enclosed Cameron Contracting will await direction from K.C. Construction, Inc., before we remove and replace the sidewalk at cores C & K. Please keep us up to date. Thank you. Sincere Bri. T" udder Project Manager CCI Job#94 -71 UU11MGM NU. TUUII I IVVUR.0 NV. INVUILC UMIC IIV V VIUC MIVIUUPI 1 Re: Riverwalk Curb & Sidewalk IVVIVVIV 1 rIVV 1st Additior Corinc VIJ-.VVnn1 ervxciv (P -1414) results. rdci '.nLa.n /.IVIVVIlI • CAMERON CONTRACTING. INC. CAMERON CONTRACTING. INC. 12/88 3309 W. BISMARK AVE. SPOKANE, WA 99205 -7495 DATE CONTROL NO. AMOUNT A 07/26/96 13588 726.42 8 PAY Seven Hundred Twenty Six Dollars & Forty Two Cents E 1 1 TO THE ]RDER OF Spokane County 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 v013588" L 25 L070371: 0 L6O» 8K808 UNITED SECURITY BANK CHEWELAH, WASHINGTON 99109 98- 703 -1251 11 9 RECEIPT Date 24- 19 r p 9062 Received From I (tom Wady do) Address �.y SectialiV net) Y� -b�LtT a+t1 %- Dollars $7 I For P/4-14 'Cawfl nor' "ACCOUNT AMT. OF ACCOUNT AMT. PAID BALANCE - DUE HOW PAID CASH MONEY ORDER ciat /35' By 13588 135881 Post-lit Note Date y/Z 1456. Z s Prom r 7671 To Fx(C o'GSf'EA t'NRR.Y , Cb IJ tflr4 CoJDept. SQo c4TiC GL.wri Co. )e4 E1uatt Phone # Phone* Fax# Fax# w DEAN HOUSLEY COMPANY 04/25/96 22:51 FAX 206 869 6620 April 25, 1996 Mr. William A. Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 RE: Riverwalk Development, Green Acres Dear Mr. Johns, u DEAN /HOUSLEY LLC 105 1401 it" 0001 I have received your letter sent to me on April 23, 1996 regarding our Riverwalk project status, and would like to bring you up-to -date on our ongoing efforts and plans for completing the current sitework at the property: Sewer lift station: The work there is essentially complete, except for resizing of the emergency generator room, final electrical connections, and exterior site improvements. Our onsite manager Verne Jacobsen is working with Billy Urhausen of your office and our contractor KC Construction to finalize these items and we expect them to be complete in about two weeks. At that point the pump station should be ready to be activated. Since the pumping of sewage for the new homes is costing us over $1,000 per week, we have been pushing hard to get the issues sorted out and work completed, and are most anxious to see the station online as soon as possible. 1st Addition: Ed Parry met with our representative Mark Hancock yesterday and outlined the discrepancies between the work in the field as compared with the County approved set of plans. Unfortunately we were not aware of these and have begun immediately to address them. KC Construction has begun to complete those items they can, while some will require the assistance of the engineer and coordination with Ed Parry. We are pursuing the corrected as -built drawings, which North Idaho Engineering has promised Verne that he can pick up tomorrow for delivery to the County. We have also requested a complete submittal of test and inspection reports. The major work items seem to be a drywell/catchbasin situation, a pipe/pond capacity question, and a temporary turnaround that was not on the drawings KC used to build the work (but did appear on the final approved set of drawings). 2nd Addition: Inland Pacific Engineering gave us their punchlist April 12, which Verne and KC Construction completed April 23. Utilities were also completed, and we had KC Construction do some other repairs on catch basins that were brought to our attention by James Radke's letter of March 28, 1996. We have asked IPE to request the final inspection meeting with the County as provided for on page 48 of the Spokane County Standards. Given that Riverwalk is the first project under the County's new inspection procedures, we understand that IPE is taking a second look at the work, and is also in the process of revising their asbuilt drawings and test/inspection reports package. Any other work required by IPE and/or the County will be addressed by us quickly, as we just did with the recent punchlist 16720 N.E. 116th Street • Redmond, Washington • 98052 • 206.869.6618 • Fax 206.869.6620 DEDICATED T O B U I L D I N G till A I. I T Y' I1 O M E S/ A N D C O M M tI N I T I >:S 04/25/96 22:52 FAX 206 869 6620 DEAN /HOUSLEY LLC 002 William Johns, 4/25/96, page 2 3rd Addition: Punchlist work for this addition was also completed April 23. We understand that since this plat contains no public facilities, it should be ready to record after the 2nd Addition is recorded. We would like to proceed with the final inspection meeting on this addition as well. We have been making a real effort to complete these projects, especially in these past few weeks as our recent progress shows. I would greatly appreciate it if you could reconsider your rejection of plan review for the previously submitted drawings of the 4th and 5th Additions, so the plancheck of the roads and storm could occur while we work on the items above. One of the problems with the previous additions was their start late in the season, and we would like to avoid repeating that mistake. Also, we understand that the water drawings are already approved and that the sewer drawings are about ready as well, so it would be a shame to have the job held up later because the road approvals were so much farther behind. I would also appreciate your support in bonding what little work, if any, remains on the 2nd Addition. The work is complete to our knowledge, including the recent corrective work noted above, so while it is possible that some punchlist items may occur during the final IPE and County walkthroughs, the work is essentially done. While the project may have gotten off to an awkward start, we are working hard to clean up the loose ends. We added Inland Pacific Engineering to the team, and brought in Verne and Mark in the last several months to watch over and improve our performance. We have appreciated the help of the County personnel, especially over the past several weeks in bringing us up to speed on the process and the problems, and we will follow the work more closely as the project develops in the future. With commitments to partners, lenders and lot purchasers, 1 can assure you that we are as anxious as you to see these items resolved as soon as possible, and are working hard to accomplish that. We are proud of the quality of our houses and of the overall development, and have every intention of improving our sitework performance as well. Thank you for your help and consideration of the above. Sincerely, 7 n • Edward Dean Partner cc: Dennis Scott Bill Hemmings Ed Parry James Radice Terry Lightfoot • ILT DEAN HOUSLEY COMPANY • • U Co 16720 N.E. 116th Street • Redmond, Washington • 98052 • 206.869.6618 • Fax 206.869.6620 .5•Zrl.t t K si. cut. trotdeLt/S" c- T- L at pc, -au oF Off_ p U -t -moo t 1 - Sul 92 1 - EL ( ' 8 33N19N3 uN(loa woods 969, 10 WV /22y ' ®3A13O3U I e D E D I C A T E D T O B U I L D I N G Q U A L I T Y El p M E S A Nj D C O M M U N I T I E S 1 Project: ! Et • i At -lt q. ` • Project No.: "� —0 Address: .leather: 5 C /9 fl ke/) ( Gou S A) Approved Plans on Site: • Yes tNo C) • • • lig • Items Observed or Tested: Footings • Auger Cast Piles Columns • Structural Slab Walls • Slab -on -Grade • Beams Other D) • • • _ • Attached Report: Concrete ❑ Resteel Mortar • Grout Asphalt ■ Structured Steel -Soils • Fireproofing Other B) All items observed appear to be in accordance with approved plans and specifications: ■Yes ■No E) Location: O ac ,t fwim p Tn R Al eel? AO CASQ nauso F) Comments: If mh /1le 4r f'ox. // c /S /9 /Uo k <, / Willi FL, Diu S / rC'. 7243 I) /)eeerytTAA a oYsr c SW ; L.E a veL/Ty COAJTR6L /=OR /All, AM I) 45 P1- I)41-.. OA) 5 /rC. l re) L0 in - 7 ` PR o C rrR T ooz 7 i4 & w t ;9- /3 `A6 cticc /rc/9 Cve4f cl s r PRAM OM l t c 19- i t oA1f.S w/ TK A J r) c t ,9/Z 0 cAJS /n/1r7E7 .5 Fa A7 E ,O rAis/7 - g REARt r= ©/ /> -T7}. Function Hours Code Miles Code Total Expenses Code SD /L 2 223 / 3 dlt .3 3 ,t)U!t I Representative: eS ( Al Signature: n)4_4 Page 1 of v 6n DAILY FIELD REPORT 5 001C39 Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N, Spokane, WA 99206 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 891 -2012 I I ,1 iv Project: n , cRou /7 nL� F -� fi e / ( C R r 70 l 1 Project No.:so 1 06 -e a ` - 7_2 5� -95 Day of Week: Weather: S LAT % seE y Mo�U� Cton°C T est Method: AJC,c ccfi,, Location of Fill: !is— b ' i f aft i I 4" 1 a tr C a _ 6 d X1 3 General Contractor: LI C /,� ��J- l Superintendent: g / c h � Earthwork Contractor :: Foreman: Test Number Test Location Elev Proctor Number Probe Depth Test Moist Content % Test Dry Density pcf Percent Compaction Remarks /00' FROM 1:7 RR 6A / /0" 9'. 9 /27 5' 7c Z /SD cls7 I 1 ' 1 in ?, 3 /-2.9,5 9> 3 /Set CA Srtsr 7 // / /0 " 8, 3 /ZA, l-, `) c • ■ Proctor Number Soil Descrip ion Maximum Dry Density Optimum Moisture Content Method Standard/Modified e /3RSt rou /sr /3 f 1 1 Representative: — F - E Signature: / ,\ L 1 ......._. 'q1 . Page Z_pf —2' 6AJ FIELD DENSITY TEST REPORT Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N, Spokane, WA 99206 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 891 -2012 Report No. S/ 83? Project: I "1 i o r c / \ c a 7 Project No.:I V / / g. 0/7 Address: Date: 7-7 /- / C� c .leather: C( gat/ Day of Week: )2 A) Approved Plans on Site: • Yes ❑ No C) Items Observed • Footings • • Columns • • Walls • s E Soils ■Beams or Tested: Auger Cast Piles Structural Slab Slab-on-Grade D) • • • • Attached Report: Concrete • Resteel Mortar • Grout Asphalt ❑ Structural Steel -Soils • Fireproofine Other 13) All items observed appear to he in accordance with approved plans and specifications: Other • Yes • No / / l . rr E) Location: 0 1 i • !! 1 % I i. :I C-% 7o F) Comments: ar/ 1 A 1 � s'Fake re A L'7-chi O A' C Co.0.57 C,NJ* AiivED 7 1/A1 W 6- /Cap is P o c# J. A 2 !S , O cc ro,. re577A9r- 7`06/Y 0c/5J/7 /a5 1/ rnog©ci ' 0 c,9 y C/U5 1c9 cr../ A j 0 et_ &WA ecAlf /O//CER_ s &T /ycL,9 AssitY RcPORr A ©R 4047.9 0 ES0 L _ LC i — • . � o • : s5O (-- 6 PAD(' f.3ur G/ewA)I) 6CULEV/922-Y VE/Z IliciRa Function Hours Code Miles Cycle Total Expenses Code /L ' 2- 7z3 /3 33 iti -- a / ,-- 71 Representative/gc, 6�y /1 Signature: C 4 Q , Page 1 of —2—_— DAILY FIELD REPORT 5 001 :54 0' ,.93 Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N, Spokane, WA 99206 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 891 -2012 Project: &/I h /1 ♦ � - L 70 / L !/ C/C i . Project • No.: Iowl ` Off c 'ale: ^7 /`Os� Day of Week: p!P / T Weather / q M Test ethod: A I tC 4 A S3. p p � .- ocation of Fill: 6ff /1 / ro BA 17 PD. f /?& A' ,c--, 3nmup ( q n General Contractor: C l�t C o, /V �/S ! `s7x'(I „Y' /Alham\ l Superintendent: +n / (.l l7_ (('� Eanhwork Contractor: Foretnan: Test Number Test Location Elev Proctor Number Probe Depth Test Moist Consent % Test Dry , Density pcf Percent Compaction Remarks / n° PRIM? > er �,J fit_ /0 '9 7t `.. 3 8 "- /pro/ C,of rosf/ 1 / to" `, 3 / 35. < 3 /do , G r OF re z- 'r /e" 5' i V I L too' .cI or mss: 3 // A i/ e ° (Y\, C--- C--- S 6s S / of T s< / � �o „ 5, g /3 5'r t t Q Ca m Proctor Number Soil Description Maximum Dry Density Optimum Moisture Content Method Standard/Modified 1S RIJ 5 /47 (rsta L- / //j I Representative:4E $ fill P 7-E_ e- Signature: �e� l � Page Lof� � FIELD DENSITY TEST REPORT Report No .,S/ 9S j ass Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N, Spokane, WA 99206 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 891 -2012 11111 :. _ . \ X111 — . s _ ig 0 _ A.),...N 0 11 11 5 1111 1111 10 15 IIII 1111 20 25 1111 30 1111 35 1111 1111 40 4! 2 0 w > CC m w 1- 0 w 0 w r m 0 w 0 U w 0 0 m 140 P135 0 0 X130 0 125 0 120 cc 115 0 z 110 0 EL 105 100 95 cc 90 D 85 80 WATER CONTENT (PERCENT) PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk PROJECT NO: SO416 -0110 DATE: July 24, 1995 SAMPLE LOCATION: Unknown. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Light brown coarse sand with gravel. TEST PROCEDURE: ASTM D -1557, METHOD: C, Modified MOISTURE CONTENT: 6.016 DRY DENSITY: 139.5 PCF REFERENCE NO.: SL1184 REMARKS /DEVIATIONS: PROCTOR TEST RESULTS HCI Howard Consultants, Inc. PL ATE STA. OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. /f S-D /Z' ,cr / r51 / 92 _ 9- /y0 /3 2 tS- b ' Lr /`yo,/ /3F?, / ° 7 _3 371-s-0 el Or /93. / 7 // 7??,/ y tso / s' Pr /en,9 . s /1 - / /2,1z rfs -o /c r /_ ' z,r ,. //, Lr /y/ e AVG. /7 R 7/ 9 STA. OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. ‘4-515" 9' Lr /fo, _, qo ( 9- / 39: / 3' <r /39, z 7-1-r0 (38, 8 7° L 7'RT /37, 3 74 -5--- 0 /JS.< 90 3 175-° //, Lr /r15-- 9 72 - /7 R / / ' fir /3& 6 / 0I-St l3 9 0 90 AVG. 90 $ //1'S ZS //V5 7r/ 6/} L/ ou 2 Z 4- A /AJ /i'? 25 /fYS 7.57 l AI✓o4 2 - 2 9- FM) INLAND ASPHALT CO. ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMPACTION REPORT CONTRACT IAC GAUGE PROJECT NO. NO. NO. ENGINEER SECTION .z 4 )n /AA(iA A1/ OE REMARKS' ROLLER CODE: SDV = SINGLE DRUM VIBRATORY TS = TANDEM STEEL DDV = DOUBLE DRUM VIBRATORY 3WS = 3 WHEEL STEEL P = PNEUMATIC W TO STA. TO STA. CONTROL LOT NO. TONS ATB THICK 3 CLASS B, D, E, F, G LANE: ®OR IgZI; t3j NB, SB OTHER LEVELING STD. DENSI ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT AIR 70 GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR REMARKS: STA. CONTROL LOT NO. TONS A P ATB THICK B, D, E, F, G LANE: ICOOFGD ;SO NB, 56 OTHER LEVELING WEARING CLASS STD. DENSI ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT AIR 70 C. GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR DISTRIBUTION: WHITE • FILE CANARY - SUPT. PINK - O.A. WEARING V RICE DENSITY / 3 - 3 TO STA. RICE DENSITY DATE INSPECTOR /� w ht_ - STREET INSPECTOR CONTRACTOR PAGE 2. OF 3 PAGES. IA-6 REV. 6/89 Project: ,Ql vac_ I, q Project No.: 49 4- n #0 Address: EfRKE/� -- 2 0�6» $� 6.._.A.. Date: 7 .✓eat her: CLelac Day of Week:777/0R c A) Approved Plans on Site: • Yes • No C) Items Observed or Tested: • Footings • Auger Cast Piles • Columns • Structural Slab • walls • Slab -on -Grade • Soils 0 Beams • Other D) Attached • Concrete • Mortar ❑ Asphalt • Soils ❑ Other Report: • Resteel • Grout ❑ Structural Steel ❑ Fireproofing B) All items observed appear to he in accordance with approved plans and specifications: ❑ Yes • No E) Location: 0,0 2/Tr F) Comments: p / L t Ep AN Pi (/r a e t c--YE- iNra��s /-7- /q TA'�iitPoaer To H c r An n fl s PE $S%,A s4 Op ,l cr le eQ u /Re rs, Function Hours Code Miles Total Expenses Code l 22 9 / 0 COk efee7 e V Signature: / a Page I of es i 01 Representative: eic fi/ / ;re 697 DAILY FIELD REPORT Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N, Spokane, WA 99206 (509) 891-1904 Fax (509) 891-2012 DATE REPORTED: July 5, 1995 DATE RECEIVED: June 8, 1995 SPECIMEN: Concrete Riverwalk Spokane, Washington MIX NO.: 7906 LOCATION: Curb on north side, approximately 125' east of Barker Road. TEST METHODS: ASTM C -1064, C -231 TAG: 395475 AIR TEMP: 43 °F TRUCK: 5164 MIX TEMP: 59 °F TIME: 6:25 pm ENTRAINED AIR: 5.2% LABORATORY NUMBER 1127(A) 1127(B) 1127(C) DATE CAST (ASTM C -31, C -172) DATE TESTED (ASTM C -39) AGE AT TEST, days SLUMP, inches (ASTM C -143) DIMENSIONS, inches AREA SQ., inches APPARENT FRACTURE TYPE MAXIMUM LOAD, pounds ULTIMATE STRENGTH AS TESTED, psi 06/07/95 06/14/95 7 1 6 x 12 28.26 Cone 102,000 .3605 06/07/95 07/05/95 28 1; 6 x 12 28.26 Shear 126,000 4455 06/07/95 07/05/95 28 1; 6 x 12 28.26 Cone 129,000 4560 REQUIRED 28 DAY STRENGTH, psi 3000 3000 3000 MEETS SPECIFICATIONS X FAILS TO MEET SPECIFICATIONS NO STRENGTH CAST BY REQUIREMENTS HCI GIVEN d a CAST BY OTHERS TRANSMITTAL TO: Ed Dean Construction c/o KC Construction PO Box 1455 Havden, ID 83835 OPY TO: HCI Consulting Geotechnical Engineers & Geologists N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N, Spokane, WA 99206 509 - 891 -1904 Fax 509- 891 -2012 Howard Consultants, Inc. Project No. SO416-0110 Compression Test: ASTM C -39 Report No. 1574 Project: k/ je AIOAL–l'C Project No.: 9 0 %Ab O Address: Date: 6 - - -- 7-9s . cachet: eL OUj7 Day of week: U p A) Approved Plans on Site: C) Items Observed or Tested: Piles Slab rre D) Attached jaConcrete Report Steel • Yes • No • Footings • Auger Cast • Resteel • Columns • Structural • Mortar • Grout 8) All items observed appear to be in accordance with approved plans and specifications: • walls • Slah -on -Grade • Asphalt • Structural ❑ Soils ®.other CORl3 • Beams • Soils • Fireproofing 4 (-O . • Other ❑ Yes • No E) Location: C U/l/3 10 ate 77-/ S/PF o, /4Ub /AG3.n (7) APP/'OJC, / 2 C ' BAST o.- 8AR46e PP. F) Comments: ARRI LG67) c :re /i /t r oasc::-Tem. -b f[ A c CM-670 r AA.)0 PEA:rag/LIED 7 c.57- S aAi rat I c E T E 04 C / 14- i9MP A CZ to cQ o l x ETC c41 % S. 2 j.N C AS -I FRO,U C A T o /uG t aw ! i C • : r -/ Ems. T fO 017% . / %yn,l rS/r 7'Ni r TWO/ O004 r/ ,U-EED ten C Y4 /ip2< 729es0 19 EL ' 9.En Tv /7 C' L 0 Er/ « RN/) cA'- ta, /' C 9 /1/14- OA X 6 (J9s2 , 7UI ftfi .r Co,49S e fn / _L /f y Coe)tc 4 03//9 TN R- T /,l) /) EE/) rM r h'AD Co,o r, a ()as 0 )33 CPU 69tTin/(9 A.9/9S tPETQM /RED. --r iii t D -rn s/ % AO /) !) A CERUE/J PO t/ R _ 0/O pt Cny-P.PLE77 , «(9 v// n' To o k i2,1)n /77 at45 C fl /,vb&e 0 7,'2 44i ZZ FRDH 7 cl; ' Function Hours Code Miles C15 Total Expenses Code Co,t3cpc 4 Z 22 `L /0 33 Co hi cK c z- 1 . Z -`f /o e 33 71 Representative: LEl /N/ /Tt- Signature: At IF / Page 1 of m8 DAILY FIELD REPORT S 01. Howard Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road. Suite 5N, Spokane, WA 99206 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 891 -2012 Project: l k.)r,2 u At_ i - Project No.: S - 0 4- 16„ -o (tt Address: '1 iesAc_z.2 k, 1.551 o!J Date: (c — (p—cg .. c:uher: -- _l e t. I k2 Day of Week. Tls , A) Approved Plans on Site: • Yes • No C) Items Observed or Tested: • Footings • Auer Cast Piles • Columns • Structural Slah • Walls • Slab -on -Grade • Soils ■Beams • Other D) Attached Report: Steel • Concrete • Resteel ❑ Mortar ❑ Asphalt ❑ Soils • Other ❑ Grout ❑ Structural • Fireproofing 8) All items observed appear to be in accordance with approved plans and specifications: • Yes • No E) Location: 0 OrA S t TP A-1 f LSD A.... A A) P )A Lk ED F) Comments: , A-2-2- t )1 W t' 1 14- c--,1/4)( ' PP.m -PL.tz -ii - tnl -ELg , i t4EY SALO 7 1-1-+9 -T 1'*1-r t - i K - ) A t (—A-te h-t CT L 1 A-.5 r.) m •-- C 9„.„.., 3 I .e A IQ n ) i &) 4. s 'T—b4-AT Cr i - �J.r� -s G Pt - 1Y\ r r Y St 1&)F CZn t r tR9F 2 r� Z4,0 (' I '4, ori= i cit f) '0 A (IN - fi, z ro r ,r. c.. raat.a i ALAT 7 F-9 NA-0 r4&cEccrn 75 (o1.)c,eLi,C P4q,c tza, — ,c- w Fn. Function Hours Code Miles Code Total Expenses Code Cox .G t2F i I 2211 10 @ , 3 I "I Representative: Signature: Page 1 of DAILY FIELD REPORT M 2053 Howard Consultants. Inc. 1428 South Main Street, Moscow, ID 83843 (208) 882-1006 Fax (208) 883-4750 STA. OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. / too 9 LT / 3R, y 5 /7“, - 2_ 4-- op 9' Rr g S /3 7. 8 /37.. 3-e- Y ' Rr /3R9 p � /37 y 7x oo <r / 3R,9 85 3croo S' r j38 - 90 - /37. 1 AVG. 8? A1'/S zsv hers' 2s7 (AUO.V Z z - fr" INLAND ASPHALT CO. ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMPACTION REPORT CONTRACT IAC GAUGE PROJECT NO NO. NO. ENGINEER SECTION AM t?Allat.) REMARKS: STA. AVG. OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. SDV = SINGLE DRUM VIBRATORY DDV = DOUBLE DRUM VIBRATORY P = PNEUMATIC ROLLER CODE: TS = TANDEM STEEL 3WS = 3 WHEEL STEEL " 1-) A 7n ,S STA. TO STA. CONTROL LOT NO. TONS ii ATB THICK Z CLASS 8, D, E, F, G LANE: p OR3; EB, I ,Ci) OTHER LEVELING WEARING STD. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR STA. TO STA. CONTROL LOT NO. TONS ACP ATB THICK CLASS B, D, E, F, G LANE: LT. OR RT. ; EB, WB, NB, SB OTHER LEVELING WEARING STD. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT DISTRIBUTION: WHITE - FILE CANARY- SUPT. PINK - O.A. DATE RICE DENSITY %L.C3• GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR RICE DENSITY AIR REMARKS: INSPECTOR / )4 , AA - STREET INSPECTOR CONTRACTOR PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGES. IA -6 REV. 6/89 Project: R IV CR (i.* Lk Project No.: soy/ g- O// & )dress: - Mt7/AIUR `I ReRFE2 Date: 6" 9s Weather: � L o0Or Day of Week: FOP/ A) Approved Plans on Site: C) Items Observed or Tested: Piles Slab D) Attached Report: Steel • Yes ❑ No • Footings • Auger Cast • Concrete • Resteel • Columns • Structural • Mortar 54-Asphalt ❑ Grout B) All items observed appear to he in accordance with approved plans and specifications: ❑ walls • Slab-on-Grade • Structural ❑ Beams r • Soils • • Soils • Fireproofing S ELl Other A S?NA • Other • Yes • No E) Location: t PPROXAldI y </ 00 OF 2 10/919#) J9l /t , CRsr or DARNER f1,9 R/L1o SO Soury 0 7 /r4.0 if / //11 F) Comments: A ftR/ // E. Ai,, . 08 SGRI/C D P2 I < «-IEJ r off" A ol..) PnR FOP/WEB TE.S -s 0Ai A SP/'e-cr. SEE COMP/4 c r / o.0 R et" d ' I J R 7 F n k l , 4 » - TFA/PFR J-i L9RES 4I ERE A FnL,4 (04_95. 0 8: ' o 2 'O F ri?0c/( 5`9z / ; SS PN 29SD r I o c• v 929 3: 20 PM Z 6S F Function Hours Code Miles Code Total Expenses Code 4_5/ 7- ° Jjz 2 Z/f /D , 33 /OWE 8 37 II .:I Representative: /v T Signature: i ‘ 3/4 / Page 1 of DAILY FIELD REPORT S 001E46 Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N- Spokane, WA 99206 009) 891 -1904 Fax 1509) 891 -2012 W DEAN DE I LY COMPANY March 7, 1996 • zvia FAX w Mr. Randy Wild, Vice President • Inland Asphalt Company P. 0. Box 3388 Spokane, WA 99220 RE: Rivenvalk Paving Dear Mr. Wild: I received your letter today to Mike Klika regarding your feelings about the paving situation on Indiana Avenue at Rivenvalk. Unfortunately, the approval process for County roads to get acceptance generally takes a period of years (as you must certainly know), and the case of Riverwalk has been further complicated by the fact that contrary to your letter the Indiana work was not adequately "inspected at the time of installation" and was not "accepted by the time of final payment to Inland in 1996." As a result, we were forced to spend additional time attempting to document what few inspections were taken (your office was contacted during that search process. and the results were in the package given to Mr. Murphy and Mr. McKinney), and failing in that we were forced to spend additional funds to do the destructive testing for the County that you see now (we spent more on the testing and reports than you are being asked to give the County, and since your work failed we are not happy about that). Regardless of how we got to this point, the fact remains that 3 of the 6 core tests taken in Indiana failed in regards to thickness, which is a 50% failure rate. I understand that the thickness variance may not seem great and might be overlooked in a private development. but Indiana is a public road and the County Engineer has rejected the road and they must be satisfied. We look to you to make arrangements with Mr. Johns to resolve this matter, both because you are responsible for the work and because of your relationship with the County. If we can help in this process or I can join you in your meetings with the County, please let me know. Very truly yours, L�i ietttc Mark Hancock Land Development Manager cc: Mike Klika Ed Dean 16720 N.E. 116th Street • Redmond, Washington • 98052 • 206.869.6618 • Fax 206.869.6620 S P 0 K A N E 5 F•., ' =�'+`r d C O U N T Y wr DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer February 20, 1996 K.C. Construction Inc. 2025 W. Dakota Ave. P.O. Box 1455 Hayden Lake, ID 83835 Att: Dean Brezinski Re: Riverwalk PUD 1st Addition (Riverway Villa): Sanitary Sewer System Dear Dean, Please be advised that the Construction Division accepts the quality of construction of the following system components: - All mainline sewer pipe, manholes, and side service stub -outs located beneath paved roadways within the platted boundaries of Rivelwalk PUD 1st Addition. The above acceptance will allow the County Utilities Department to establish a one year warranty period. Utilities will begin this period when all as -built drawings, 0 & M manuals, easements, and other related system components have been satisfactorily provided. Any additional defects observed in the system during the warranty period will be brought to your attention by the Spokane County Utilities Department. Note that minor cleaning related faults may still be present within the above system (rock located 3 feet downstream of the cap at 189/16.7). Removal of any remaining cleaning faults will be brought to your attention upon completion of the 1 year warranty period. Jim Radke, P.E. Construction Engineer CC: Bruce Howard (IPEC); Jim Legat (Utilities) 0 o f L! '1 A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis NI. Scott, P.E., Director 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane. WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324-3475 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 JUN -14 -95 WED 05:15 n'. INLAND ASPHALT CO JUN 13 '55 PERMIT JUN 13 1995 INLAND ASPHALT P POO O BOX E 3366 534 -2657 The applicant hereby applies for permission to CRUSHED ROCK AND ASPHALT PAVING FOR RIVERWALK PHASE I G a11 P COUNTY E .099229144 , /g P.1 0'3:17RM SPOKANE DEPT OF BLDG OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W. BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99280 PHONE (609) 458.3800 TO PERFORM WORK ON COUNTY ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY CO #64331 Permit # 95 - EAB118 WA 99220 993 -0556 ********* ********************** - * t*********** * ** * * ** * * * * * ** *** * ** * * * * * * * * ** * APPLICANT^;IS. AWARE THAT _THER E. NO P PROVED _.STREE &„ D 'Wm_ p Li * * is, AGREES .TO HOLD SPOKANE C HARM S6 .& N A CEP B ALL $ PONBILIT * * SHOD *D **HE** **** *G *RADE *NE*; SI *** . A * *** * *** * E * AO * * & * ASP * HA * * L * * * ** * t**** ** *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ** ** *a *irk * * ** * * * * * ** * **** * * ** * * * ** *No cuts on county roads with asphalt less than 5 year old.* *** * ** * * * * ** ** * * * * * *w * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * *** ** * * ** ** * *+ **** * *4* 6/3/9s e /Wa)/V f. /oeel Si / S , 61 ' C-S tfr Dace work to start UN 114 1995� -- which estimated time required for f the above work is 30 days petitioner agrees to prosecilte with all diegenee and speed with due regard or the rights, iinterest e and conveniences of the public. Petitioner further agrees to perform the work in strict compliance with the provision* enumerated below and states that ho has read and will adhere to the general provisions applicable to permits contained or the reverse side of this form. The undersigned guarantees that if the backlit!. street surfacing or improvement fails within two years from the date of final inspection by Spokane County, he shall pay the cost of the County for making redalrs or reatoratlon of the .naa and imnrnvnma.tR 1n eanaidn...lt.._.,... -e - -_ y ..,,, it. p ern u. ,,,00 w.s. , 4 t+7lt.cappIIvanttna11ne 4:OUnt 07 S okan d any atticer or employee thereof ahall ha tavaA kormlasa by 11.• •ppllaa..t from ally naulun7 tot rcapa61011Ity f or any accident, loss or aamage to persons or property, happening or occurring as the proximate result of any of the work undertaken under the terms of this appl and the permit orpermltsWhich may be granted in response thereto, and That all of said liabilities are hereby assumed by the applicant. ft is further agreed that if any Dart of this in lotion Interferes with the future use of the highway by the general pt.: I• usf b§/ omOVOdorrerocatedasd eeng' eerat the expense of the permlttee or his successor in inter.: Z // Printed below or on an Of thls form. Subject to all the terms, condltJ6rI& and b /o4i i6n3 written or PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED the above applicant to PERFORM WORK TO COUNTY STANDARDS. APPLICANT IS AWARE THAT THE STREET PLANS FOR RIVERWALK PHASE I ARE NOT F�� A AND AGREES TO HOLD SPOKANE COUNTY HARM $S AND ACCEPTS ALL RESPONS I LITY SHOULD TH FINAL GRADE NECESSITATE ANY Kfi GES BE % OF MAXIMUM D C NN ONT N � T R T Y L AS E DET U AMDNfiD BY WASHIN CONTROL DSPECIFICATION IN THE BRIDGE IONOR AS DIRECTED BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER. r %:4h 3/4 er-' fee $ 10 Inspect }}on tee $ REIMBURSED Total $ BILL Paid by CH # he amount of $5 0 issued to IN ASPHALT CO ie g9%1.red to i sure ompli nce with the above conditions said bend to b kept in fus_ force an i n effect r 1 1 p »llthor_ zed by thss permit, for a period of 2 ears o lowing comp etion of work :oommpleted 1 41199nrleas the work herein contemplated shall have been INSPECTION REQUIRED — 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED i ' e 456 -3600 to notify when work begins and schedule Inspection. K BY DATE 06/13/95 It is the responsibility of the app ily all utilities and private progeny owners when Such properly iS liable tO Injury or damage through the performance of the above work and the Ann/Inas. et -v - ..e4+.,11 P. 01 JUN 06 ' 95 09: 36RM SPOIL •' C- DEPT OF BLDG QFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ly�� PHONE 5 5B00 1028 W BROAD P SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 69280 PERMIT TO PERFORM WORK ON COUNTY ROAD -OF-W E� Ciia 95 - CAMERON 4E 1995 CAMERON N CONTRACTINQ, INC SPOKANEB 9MARK AVE 99205 -7402 466 -55 The applicant hereby applies for permission to I CONSTRTJCT CURB AND GUTTER INDANA FOR ERWALK PHASE I are old.` + k#* ##### ki# k `#ki# roade RIV halt # lees k than 5 Years *No cut* On *4** kk #k ###k#k #i* * ** * * *k * * * ***# #iir+ k1r # #k #kk#ik kikk # ## 1 /' 9 start JUN 1995 Date wok to s � dd yy 'rne a timated time re e2red for completion of he ab egecwork e3 0d wi 4hich tfo pthiti ag ® g 11 regard or the rig}1te, ntereate and conveniences o the public. petitioner further agrees to Perform the work in strict compliance with the provisions enumerated below and states that he The has read and will adhere to undersigned guarantees that if he backtlll,, surfacing or improvement fails within h two reverse yeas from the date of final imPOv ementts..I InconsderationofthegrantingofthispermitItisagreedby the pplicanrtthattheCountyofSpokane andany officer or employee thereof shell to saved harmlees by the applicant from anyIlabllltY of responsibility tor any Occident, Iota Or age terms damof pp app Icatonrand Under the te of hiu ' hereby (assumed by the app licant. It is further agreed that If any pen of this installation interferes with the future use of the highway by the general public, It must bp removed or relocated es designated by the engineer at the expense of the perm flee or his sueceeeor In interest. . i08 i (R•'lh gn the pert protection of Such nrope Hx : : : : : : :; : ::IERMIT rented below or on any part of this form, Subject to all the terms, canditic�r • •iltip /p9i>il$fi9i.[Itlen or printed PERMISSION 19 HEREBY GRANTED the above applicant to, PERFORN WORK TO COUNTY STANDARDS) AND IN COMPLI CE WITH APPROVED D PLAAA�NT? ON FILE IN COUNTY ENGIEERS OFFICE. INSPECTOR TO_CH K PRI R T POUR PIJ FQpRR RIVERWNOTICE E- FFI D. AGREES TO_HOLO'SPOICANES"'CO Tty H,ARNI1ESS AND ACCEPTS ALL REFIRED. ON IBI ItYr COO OLTPERFMTTTCD ALL STREET IMPR``OVEMENTSTTOTBEESA STAKED A E LICENSED (ENNN(}SEDLLSANIN SU V COUNTY N C 9DER AILNN OR REPLACMENT RBSAND SIDEWALK. COUNTY PLANS M ST 1D EN TALL TO COMMEN ON THE JOB SITE FOR WORK with Manual on Uniform Trafnc Co BY 'tit the reap damage thr ppii en ; an P.1 EIMBURSED Total $ BILL Paid by CH t }on fee P y t bon o DATE 06/06/95 to notify ell utilities end private properly ownere when such property is liable tra Injury of of the above work and the applicant shall make all necessary arrangeme relative to tt C btee !of uulltles. Trafnc control signing permit must be evallsDte on th w site end is valid be ket of weir) been r) SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING - DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES BOND ESTIMATE FORM PROJECT eUfe Wlx,k PREPARER ( 31;4- tTEWI 01 W6S DATE 7 3 - 45 PROJECT NO . P ITEM # DESCRIPTION QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL COST 1 TYPE "A" DRYWELL d c4. $ 2 TYPE "B" DRYWELL EA $ 3 TRIPLE DEPTH DRYWELL $ 4 FILTER FABRIC LINING FOR TYPE A & B DRYWELLS FILTER FABRIC LINING FOR TRIPLE DEPTH DRYWELL $ 6 BACKFILL FOR DRYWELLS 7 TYPE 1 METAL GRATE $ 8 TYPE 2 METAL GRATE0 41A. $ 9 TYPE 3 METAL GRATE $ 10 TYPE 4 METAL GRATE $ 11 TYPE 1 CONC INLET PADS $ 12 WSDOT TYPE 2 GRATE $ 13 WSDOT TYPE 2 CONCRETE INLET BASE - UNIT "H" $ 14 SPOKANE CO. CONC. INLET 'Pa z. -(6-0) 15 SPOKAND CO. STANDARD I CURB INLET (DRWG. #8-9) 444. $ 16 48" PRECAST MANHOLE $ 17 SOLID METAL LID CtoC%.rib' -3 Eq. $ 18 DITCH /208 EXCAVATION 249 Gi, $ 19 8" ST SEWER - $ 20 IZ ST SEWER - D.T. P. 649I.F. $ 21 10" ST SEWER - $ 22 12" ST SEWER - C. M,P, 7a L,F. 23 15" ST SEWER - M,p, t}L} 1 'F. 24 18" ST SEWER - 25 21" ST SEWER - 26 24" ST SEWER - 27 30" ST SEWER - 28 36" ST SEWER - NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS: 1 t L- IMQC12D(a414 Fog Keis-teNE WALL 1S6 2 I7, 581 S.F, &Q0ss thceoscelNc, 3 "ripe z cue NILE,s ^(670TRL) 8-9 ScD 5 6 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: $ COMMENTS ON BOND ESTIMATE: 1 M I 1 Fr F2 n iv) i'� i S I;I III ii E Ni LI f 1 . zP _ II H fi; I zLi I� I led � � l I s..)7 1S I _I lug k 1.1 11 1 ! 1.1 T_YP 1 .0 _ t3 R ling I I H ■■ 8 ' I\ r� L. 1' 110°T° • C � I F "'-' 1411 I eifniii Y gi- , = M1 Lt 1"Wµ i_� C v 1 � Ito LZ Ls .1 ■ _ bi H ta' 10826 ui ./ � . YP fl 8 . Lu_ 2 7 � 4 c± v.) IQ. ■ ■ ✓ B Tha Kfl . .1 ✓ G i___ 4 • L J j O+ Z I w W L_ L\1_ - Q z E L I c JA d - I � ✓ !s L` > c ix ° 0 /4 a ✓ t G ! d o_ Jr it I Di ■ ■ ■ ■ C. ■ il ■ 0ir, L-r ,t D- Y, 0 F_ 1© I v� ,. 1 L,Y L. =' % theoe *L \V W %t , r _ C Lai I 171 2L, 1 1 A �■ ■� ■■ I ((PE o c . rile - 4-µ d. lR i h • _Cc Y, I* iiiw1NI • -.0 I v1 ' y ZI O 1 t P I uc. a E 1 x1 " ut N, vdlTio -11 I_ 1" Lz I� 111 ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■1 ■ 1 1■na 111 ''"11 ■E ■■ 1 1■C11 ■ ■ .L L ■1 H _ i. 6 1)01.it. Fin ■ l f► 9 5 ■ ✓ -r1 , ‘4"- Ws �� ed 9 LY y ml _I I 13 � I I 11� � 17 OI<e id _ ,a G w :: , ' =Curi I . I LA I„ L f ■ t"1 Ld g ti pod LL' a -z - - w ,o �,/ s1 ■■ 9 E 3 1. norrr Let_ ■■�■ ✓ r N; ■ ■ 1 ■ __ 0._ ,N C , 9 C ■■ 9 : . .: ■�i ■m ■ ■ 9 _■ '�. ' 1 v a g Im 17 I c � " tYPe Fit. c y 4 L lem g ( ^e: Lit ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ✓ 0, 1 40 I0," 1 Iq l � 1 4 c I� I ■ �� ■ / s '/4saLe c� 4 ■ 1 ■ ■■I �� ■ _ ■ 7 ILL ' r_ Fn axe L4 �� I I [ J_o _jG � 1I 0 re 9 t n ■ -1 ■■ ■ ■ w ■�■ ■ 9 -- il - 9 441.4 ' '4- ' P I t. L.n ■ Ld.d ..6V1 � 114_2_.Q L—t —� o— I t1 -T I "' ELF ✓D s„ C s e A� 1 1 I C ' . • .. F „ I LL }r� _ L_ L! Fs , 5 ■ ■1 9 ..9 1: ■■ 9 J 6 «04 ss . 4 le , L's _ 6 '9 ■ 9 . ■. ■■■ C .■ ... ■. C.. 1 ■.:9 . 9 11 : 1 11 1 1 1 : •* :■ 9 ■999 ■■ ■■ ■■ 11 IJ 8 . ■ 9 ... L-' ■■ ■ ■ ■■■ ■■■ 9c ■ ... 9 9 ■ .■■ 0 9 ..9:9. .9 — 9 . ■.9 99 1•. ■ -- - ■- - ■- November 1, 1996 W.O. No. 96106 Spokane County Public Works Engineering Division W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Attn: Bill Johns. P.E. Spokane County Engineer Re: Riverwalk 1st Addition - Dear Bill: in INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. 1c1-14 iaun DvIgs RECEIVED NOV 0 1 Iddb Construction /Record Drawing information for Indiana Avenue 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509 - 458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208 -769 -7277 7A- Aroft SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1tr 50644 ITM_ As you know earlier this year we were retained by the Dean - Housley Group to assist them in providing some kind of a construction record for determining the suitability of the construction of the public roads within this plat. Although, there were two separate public roads constructed as a part of this plat we are at this time only submitting information relating directly to Indiana Avenue. This is per our conversations to do so and per several letters and memorandums which you have forwarded concerning this portion of the project. We are intending to follow up with the small portion of Mission Avenue after this portion of Indiana Avenue has been submitted. Additionally, as has been pointed out, the other projects directly affected by Indiana Avenue such as Riverwalk 2nd and 3rd will have complete submittal packages submitted in accordance with he 1995 SCRS and as required by the County Engineer. As of this writing, both sets of Record Drawings for Riverwalk 2nd and 3rd Additoins are being submitted concurrently. As you know, there were several meetings held prior to the construction of both Indiana Avenue and Mission Avenue and the result of these meetings was that the County allowed the Dean - Housley Group (DHG) to proceed with a final grading and strip paving operation for the 1995 home show that was coming up. Rather than just providing a strip paving and finishing the roadway up after the plans had been approved by the County, DI-IG and their contractor constructed as complete the entirety of Indiana and Mission Avenues without the presence of a County inspector. Therefore, DHG through IPEC now finds ourselves in the position of investigating and reporting back with record drawings and testing statistics the results of the in place constructed elements. Per discussions with yourself at the County and as part of this submittal we have evaluated three basic constructed elements. These elements are as follows: 1. Paving on Indiana Avenue, including the paving depths, compaction requirements and subgrade thickness. Cement concrete work on sidewalks and curbs, including depths and ultimate strength. A Spokane County November 1, 1996 Page 2 3. Drainage elements regarding the as designed versus the as constructed elements including pond bottom areas, pond volumes and pipe or ditch flow characteristics. 1. Paving on Indiana Avenue The paving on Indiana and Mission Avenues was placed sometime between July and June of 1995. In July, 1996 destructive testing investigations were undertaken by Gifford Consultants Incorporated (GCI) at the request of Inland Pacific Engineering Co., Inc. (IPEC) on behalf of DHG. The plan for testing was reviewed with Bill Johns at the County and was determined to be appropriate for the level of analysis which the County required to ultimately accept the roadway paving job performed. The subgrade preparation and the pavement placement were performed by Inland Asphalt Paving Co., Inc.. The program of analysis for the testing of the asphalt was to take several corings at the t locations delineated on the enclosed map within the Asphalt & Concrete Testing appendix section of this letter. The coring locations have also been delineated on the supplemental mylar sheet concerning Indiana Avenue. These coring were obtained either by IPEC, GCI or Spokane Concrete Coring. The cores were measured for thickness and then were analyzed for density by the bulk specific gravity method. The following table outlines the results of the coring and density testing obtained. Table No. 1 - Asphalt Testin Indiana Avenue Sta 0 +00 to 11 +62.66± and Mission Avenue Sta.15 +00 to +75± Core Number `. g Bulk, Specific Gravity Density I ;: (pef) • In Place Calculated Density ^: I 2° (LT 3 (1 4 5 6 CL 7 a 8 Avg 2.37 2.21 2.32 2.32 2.33 2.37 2.29 2.35 2.32 147.9 137.9 144.8 144.8 145.4 147.9 142.9 146.6 144.775 3.4 3.4 3.2 ,GG,d ('1 1" 2.8 3.0 2.8 3.4 3.15 96.2 89.7 u.,4- 9421 94.21 94.51 96.2 92.91 \I 95 94.15 A - Based upon a rice density of 153 ° - Cores No. 1 and 2 were taken on Mission Avenue and will be addressed at a later time. Item No. ; Dated • ;:, ? Content. - :Summary 1 6/6/95 Documents a canceled curb pour 2 6/7/95 Concrete curb pour on the N. Side of Indiana, report notes Spokane County also on site taking cylinders. 3 6/8/95 Picked up cylinders taken the previous day, these were supplemental to the ones the County took. 4 6/8/95 Testing report documenting strength of the cores picked up. 5 6/16/95 Paving on Indiana, with temperature tests. 6 7/21/95 Grading on the 1 -90 EB Off Ramp. 7 7/24/95 Grading and Paving on the I -90 EB Off Ramp. 8 7/24/95 Density Testing for I -90 EB Off Ramp paving. 9 7/24/96 Proctor Results 10 6/16/95 Inland Asphalt Paving Density Tests for Indiana Avenue 11 6/16/95 Inland Asphalt Paving Density Tests for Indiana Avenue 12 6/16/95 Inland Asphalt Paving Density Tests for Indiana Avenue Spokane County November 1, 1996 Page 3 As can be seen from Table No. 1, the destructive asphalt testing measurements for Indiana and have resulted in calculated densities for the most part greater than the require 91 percent as outlined in the WSDOT /APWA Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. Due to the destructive nature of the tests, tests on the subgrade were waived by the County as no reasonable means for testing could be determined without disturbing the subgrade prior to testing. Based upon the specific bulk method used with the Rice number of 153.8 as shown on the Inland Asphalt Paving testing forms all Cores 1 and 3 through 8 meet the WSDOT requirements. Core, No. 2, taken near the gutter on Mission Avenue was the only core to not meet the compaction guidelines. Therefore, Cores No. 3 through 8 which represent only Indiana Avenue should be considered acceptable. In addition to the core samples taken, several inspectors reports and testing analysis were obtained from Inland Pavings own records and also some subgrade reports from Howard Consultants Inc., (Strata) were obtained and are also included within the appendix of this document. A list of these reports and a summary of their content follows. Howard Consultants Inc., (STRATA) Table No. 2 - HCI Daily Field Reports S • Spokane County November 1, 1996 Page 4 2. Cement Concrete Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter on Indiana Avenue The sidewalk, curb and gutter was placed on Indiana and Mission sometime prior to June 1995. In July, 1996 destructive testing investigations were undertaken by Gifford Consultants Incorporated (GCI) at the request of Inland Pacific Engineering Co., Inc. (IPEC) on behalf of DI-IG. The plan for testing was reviewed with Bill Johns at the County and was determined to be appropriate for the level of analysis which the County required to ultimately accept the cement concrete work for both Indiana and Mission Avenues. Rough grading for sidewalks and roadways was provided by KC Construction. The subgrade preparation and rock placement for both pavement and curbs was performed by Inland Asphalt Paving Co., Inc.. The program of analysis for the testing of the cement concrete work was to take numerous corings at the locations delineated on the map within the Asphalt and Concrete Testing appendix section of this report. The coring locations have also been delineated on the supplemental mylar sheet concerning Indiana Avenue. These corings were obtained either by IPEC, GCI or Spokane Concrete Coring. The cores were measured for thickness and ultimately broken to determine ultimate compressive strength as the 28 -day maximum strength dates had long passed when the corings were obtained. The following table outlines the results of the coring and density testing obtained. Table No. 4 - Cement Concrete Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Testing Indiana Avenue . Sta 0. +00 to - 11 66;2 ± and Mission Avenue Sta +00 to 16 +75± Sidewalk oresz ,:,,: Core Number. Thickness Tested Strength Gatter Cores Core t Number Thickness; (in) Tested Strength (psi) A° B B C D E F G H I J K 3.6 3.8 2.4 3.3 3.9 3.4 3.2 3.4 4.2 4.0 2.7 A A A A 5488 A A A 4543 5072 A I B 2 B 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 5.2 5.4 5.3 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.6 5.5 4.3 5.9 5.5 7343 7410 7802 7810 9044 8406 7351 8060 8630 6862 7258 Spokane County November 1, 1996 Page 5 Indiana Avenue Sta 0 +00 to _11 ±66.2± • Mission A v e nue Sta 1 +00 to 1 +75± Sidewalk Cores Core Number Thickness (in) Tested.Strength (Psi) Gutter Cores Core Number Thickness Tested Strength (psi) L M N O P Q R 4.6 4.0 4.5 3.3 3.6 5.3 3.4 6288 5975 4780 A A 5845 A 12 13 41 15 16 17 18 5.0 4.8 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 8077 8110 7445 8680 7934 8201 8391 Avg 3.7 5427 Avg 5.14 7934 A - After trimming the cores depth to radius ratios were adequate for breakage and strength testing. - Cores A, B, 1 and 2 were taken on Mission Avenue and will be addressed at a later time. Below is an overall analysis, with any recommended or implemented mitigation. Sidewalk Core Depth - Sidewalk Strength - Gutter Core Depth - Generally, the depths were fairly close to 4.0- inches with the notable exceptions of Point C @ 2.4" and Point K @ 2.7 ". These two section were removed and repoured within the last several weeks to a depth of 4.0 ". No other sections were removed or replaced. All cores that could be tested were acceptable for sidewalk strength per County requirements. Generally, all depths were substandard at 5.0" well below the County requirements of 6.0 ". No remediation was recommended or under taken as a result of this testingprogram for this significant deficiencey. Gutter Strength - All cores that could be tested were acceptable for sidewalk strength per County requirements. Spokane County November 1, 1996 Page 6 3. Drainage Elements As with this report this section deals only with the drainage elements directly related to Indiana Avenue. We will provide additional Mission Avenue data after approval of the Design Deviation submitted 11/1/96. For the most part the plans substantially conform to the designs approved. In order to better delineate from the North Idaho Engineering (NIE) prepared mylars we have prepared several supplemental sheets which revise the pond dimensions and volumes. All required volumes are those volumes required for the 10 -year storm as identified within the NIE approved drainage reports for Riverwalk 1st Addition. However, there are several points that need to be brought out where supplemental calculations or additional discussions were required for verification due to construction variances from the approved plans. Indiana Avenue anprox. Sta 1 +30 A pipe installed within this reach was installed to the wrong invert in Pond A. This resulted in the pipe being buried up to 6- inches in the pond. The efficiency of the pipe has been modeled to determine if the pipe flows approximately half full will this carry the calculated storm volume, which it will. These calculations are enclosed. Additionally, an approximate 8 -foot sump was created around the outfall of this pipe to minimize the actual filling with sediment of this pipe, this sump will minimally increase the depth of storage within this area and will not affect the functioning of the overall 208 pond. Pond M, at Indiana Avenue and McMillan Lane 4 Indiana Avenue and McMillan Lane At the present time the cross -gutter has not been constructed. The main reason that this cross' gutter had not been constructed is that it could not be constructed as originally designed and approved by Spokane County. We have since provided DHG with a design which will work and expect in the very near future that this cross gutter will be installed to meet the overall drainage assumptions not only for this plat but for Riverwalk 2nd Addition. Currently this pond as constructed is outside the easement shown on the plat of record. However, a new easement has been submitted to Spokane County for approval and filing. The reconfiguration of the pond was due to placement of utilities such as power vaults in the corner behind the sidewalk and wheel chair ramp to maintain pond volume. Spokane County November 1, 1996 Page 7 Included with this submittal are two bond copies of the record drawings for Indiana Avenue as well as supplemental drainage sheets as required. If after your initial review of this submittal you would like to have a meeting to review this submittal please call at 458 -6840. When you have accepted both the report and the record drawings, a formal acceptance and letter documentation would be appreciated. Sincerely, Inl d Pacific � Ettgineering Co., Inc. Todd R. Whipple, P.E. TRW /tw cc: Dean - Housley, Mark Hancock file Supplemental Inspection Testing and Report Data Project: ttjFetl07ocC_/e Project No.: 5 — 04-1(_, -O (VD JJrc..: 1 -I-w- i 4 KAt551 Date: (— (p —cis Weather : - r I°t 1 po Day of Week: T , Al Approved Plans on Site: C) Items Observed or Tested: D) Attached Report: • Yes • No • Footings ❑ Auger Cast Piles • Concrete • Resteel li t I A C ❑ Mortar ❑ Grout ❑ Columns • Structural Slah B) All Items observed appear to he in accordance with approved plans. and specifications: • Walls ❑ Slab -on -Grade ❑ Asphalt • Structural Steel ❑ Soils ❑ Beams ❑ Other ❑ Soils ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Other l ❑ Yes • No E) Location: DAILY FIELD REPORT M 2053 ( din O rf- / c.c. E' -° A (Sy $C.SRK 0 r-gent. ,r. c i tt-At - 7 - 71-r9 NA-u E r »PcEs-cr n nye- C0 )cre.s_ P as i r� F n . Howard Consultants, Inc. 1428 South Main Street; Moscow, ID 83843 (208) 882 -1006 Fax (208) 883 -4750 FI Co nIrcnt it Function `-1 A,22tV p O-eJ S r? A - I ` SSD I t A.) co � W L'1- #1 N C)w)( tt' - 3 Pl-- ) PLR ffl -Eelir . r R te - 5 Aic t Fl-ri i 'T Code El 0.)A t t --A-t' t-e CT' u) A- S ev er - r-- C' m, ,E.--c-p. A u Il a' F 1 n) 5 S 'r- 1-N-7 li t I A C e l G2 At tnJIK)r t - 1 --- r1 ST l`14-r'Y 4)Fein, Cnr Pen—CZ) 2211 - R x'.3'3 DAILY FIELD REPORT M 2053 ( din O rf- / c.c. E' -° A (Sy $C.SRK 0 r-gent. ,r. c i tt-At - 7 - 71-r9 NA-u E r »PcEs-cr n nye- C0 )cre.s_ P as i r� F n . Howard Consultants, Inc. 1428 South Main Street; Moscow, ID 83843 (208) 882 -1006 Fax (208) 883 -4750 it Function Hours Code Miles Code Total Expenses Code (77,eC 1 2211 10 x'.3'3 l i i ; ; ,i'1 Representative: Signature: Pace I of DAILY FIELD REPORT M 2053 ( din O rf- / c.c. E' -° A (Sy $C.SRK 0 r-gent. ,r. c i tt-At - 7 - 71-r9 NA-u E r »PcEs-cr n nye- C0 )cre.s_ P as i r� F n . Howard Consultants, Inc. 1428 South Main Street; Moscow, ID 83843 (208) 882 -1006 Fax (208) 883 -4750 ii,•, R /aEde GOAL/-` Pr,;eet NL),: 50 V/6- crro AJJress: Date -: t- 7— yr we:Juicy cep 0 p f/ Day of Week: A) Approved Plans on Site: ❑ Yes ❑ No C) [tents Observed or Tested: D) Attached Report: ❑ Footin • Auger Cast Piles jaCOncrete • Rested Core Tout! ❑ Columns • Structural Slah • Min tar • Grout Bl All items observed appear tb he in accordance with approved plans and _apecthcation -I'/ ! d— /if l'' P a ll r /d .n !) ❑ was • Slah -on -Grade a Asphalt • Structural Steel c, j I ❑ Soils • Beams - • Soils • Fireproolina ®.other c n Ro 4 6-0 TreR 2:2.._ ' • Other L. ra • Yes • No EI Location: CURS Al (Di 7 - N S /D& O/c /inD/As90 C'7) R PPRO/V. / 2 c As r a P gkeIrte RP F, Cmments: II RlellS/7 C. "S'4 /l /ye c 'e-g cce (16,0 2crv.eAs a. g�() s . — L EIu n a S ca 2a2 eo v R /'z A c c/ -1e,U T AAUP PE/Q1 `C.LP/ 7 S a id r c A' E T eC 45 PER 14,57it -r` /*Np ,9 c e cQ u r,e Core Tout! Expen.w> CoAJCRrjt -I'/ ! d— /if l'' P a ll r /d .n !) /n L2-7-71 1A� .t // /"tall 11 .-t c, j I Cab T /.M aoaS 0,a,s WI- J OOM Cc9AS /Pupa/2W, X 2crv.eAs a. g�() s . — L EIu n a S ca 2a2 eo v R 0.0 77 Z- CO NFL E 7 7a/t? rep rl /a 7 ote )9.DQ/77&2,i,42 C yG /M 9s 7'zo 44/ z Z � FRoPI reoc (' Function Hours Code Miles Core Tout! Expen.w> COW. CoAJCRrjt Z 22 `f /0 . Co ti c,2 ci Z-4 2:2.._ ' Ko L. ra CJ Represent:owe: Le . 5 / he l2 - t _ Sigrwture:P 4) Pa Lie 1 Or n DAILY FIELD REPORT s on, ? cpd all i r i A Ad Tyn r rrHr r4'ey c obz. e N-CED c l) C YL /gyp s %4J17'p, 7 IQ FTORA4fp To /7 6 r oE/ 7 « AN/) - itte f( C CoDc i , �n two y, /J/ 0A X, 6 C'n49 T ct iet y C0t4 ENO S 6 /i7 7 HA-T / - T Er 7L//9 c Prig Mc]) 4 PcRiti .7 6 Or in r#/ou(, -H T" 7WA Howard Consultants, Inc. N, 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N, Spokane, WA 9920 (509) 891 -190+1 Fax (509) 891 -2012 Project: K / V er e LjI?Ur Prject No.: i94 ( //n \JJress: £fr /(E/l $- nri0D7,9,07 Date: 6 ;43.. Weather: e���� Day of Weck 7//OR S ,, \) Approved Plans on Site: C) Items Observed or Tested: D) Attached Report: • Yes • No • Footint s ❑ Auger Cast Piles • Concrete ❑ Resceel Code ❑ Columns • Structural Slab ❑ Mortar ■ Grout B) All items ohserved appear to he in accordance with approved plans and specifications: / o ❑ Asphalt ❑ Structural Steel ❑ Walls • Slah -on -Grade • Soils • Beams ■Soils • Fireproofing ❑ Other ❑ Other • Yes ❑ No E) Location: 0.4) 5/ Tr F) Comments: A AJ / U En 4, Al Pi </c 0 r ef c--3/4 . /N2C72j /cc) /j 7 - To H CZ Mb 19 $ PtCX $ $iX4 s Ai/ p "I c Code ie F-Q u / "Cc z..1 rS, / o c iOu Cne/ e DAILY FIELD REPORT S 001.:76 Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N. Spokane, WA 99206 (509) 891 -1904 Fax 15091891-2012 Function Hours Code Miles rued Expense. Code 7 22 v / o c iOu Cne/ e Signature: ,a _v (/ 1 w, Page 1 or .CI Representative:4eic age / 5,—, - L DAILY FIELD REPORT S 001.:76 Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N. Spokane, WA 99206 (509) 891 -1904 Fax 15091891-2012 DATE REPORTED: July 5, 1995 DATE RECEIVED: June 8, 1995 SPECIMEN: Concrete Riverwalk MIX NO.: 7906 Spokane, Washington LOCATION: Curb on north side, approximately 125' east of Barker Road. TEST METHODS: ASTM C -1064, C -231 TAG: 395475 AIR TEMP: 43 °F TRUCK: 5164 MIX TEMP: 59 °F TIME: 6:25 pm ENTRAINED AIR: 5.2% LABORATORY NUMBER 1127(A) 1127(B) 1127(C) DATE CAST (ASTM C -31, C -172) 06/07/95 06/07/95 06/07/95 DATE TESTED (ASTM C -39) 06/14/95 07/05/95 07/05/95 AGE AT TEST, days 7 28 28 SLUMP, inches (ASTM C -143) 1; 1; 11/2 DIMENSIONS, inches 6 x 12 6 x 12 6 x 12 AREA SQ., inches 28.26 28.26 28.26 APPARENT FRACTURE TYPE Cone Shear Cone MAXIMUM LOAD, pounds 102,000 126,000 129,000 ULTIMATE STRENGTH AS TESTED, psi 3605 4455 4560 REQUIRED 28 DAY STRENGTH, psi 3000 3000 3000 MEETS FAILS TO MEET NO STRENGTH CAST BY CAST BY SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS HCI OTHERS GIVEN X / TRANSMITTAL TO: Ed Dean Construction c/o KC Construction PO Box 1455 Hayden, ID 831135 HCI Howard Consultants, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers & Geologists N. 2128 Pincs Road. Suuc 5N. Spokane. WA 99206 509- 891 -1904 Fax 509 - 891 -2012 Project No. SO416 -0110 Compression Test: ASTM C -39 Repon No. 1574 REMARKS /DEVIATIONS: / COPY TO: SIG `'S 9 Proieet: R v t R is" tic Project Ni,.: soli 6 oir a Address: f)jomitjt 7 RR, P J4E2 Date: — / t<7s- C Weather: CL oo 07 Day of week: FA ")/ A) Approved Plans on Site: C) Items Observed or Tested: D) Attached Report: • Yes • No • Footinjs • Auger Cast Piles • Concrete • Resteel • Columns ❑ Structural Slah • -Mortar • Grout Ii) All items observed appear to he in accordance with approved plans and specifications: Code 0-Asphalt Code • walls ❑ Slab -on- Grade • Structural Steel Code /ZSPI4C7 • Soils • beams • Soils • Fireproofing ,,� ID Other A cfHALT ,33 • Other 8S/ • Yes • No E) Location: A p Rox41.b Tz y </ co OF xs to/A /Put , /cAS7 or GARNER, /}gRA10.0 V if S off : ss o . 7 )0/14,0 F) Comments: fRR/lki) A* - 08 Se R//c Q PA lc ci/-lEUr O / i4,tln PER Fop Ad rn 7 57 o xi A 5, SF cod- >PA c r /0,0 R ec i ro E dA t), _ TFl-1P c A— ok�S / 9 ER E /4 .c 1 z_ t io.k 9 S . Il DAILY FIELD REPORT 77T11 cf; a YES // 20 AN, 2 5''o V F -rp0 t 927 3:20 P z gs Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road. Suite 5N. Spokane. \V:\ 99206 (509) 391 -1901 Fax (509) 891-2012 Function Hours Code Miles Code Total Expenses Code /ZSPI4C7 c 7M_ Z Z `' /o ,33 (0U/4tC 8S/ 1 FICI keprrsenuuiveaE5 ��� // Signature: y (�C4 Page 5 of 5 Il DAILY FIELD REPORT 77T11 cf; a YES // 20 AN, 2 5''o V F -rp0 t 927 3:20 P z gs Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road. Suite 5N. Spokane. \V:\ 99206 (509) 391 -1901 Fax (509) 891-2012 Pmjccl: � � 13 f� /{ '!' I 2( � / Prujrcl Nu.:,S � / - � l� ' ©I� 0 Address: Date: 7 -? / -- y c Weather: 6c.04544/1 Day of Week: / A) Approved Plans on Site: C) Items Observed or Tested: D) Attached Report: • Yes ❑ No • Footings • Auger Cast Piles • Concrete • Resleel 55 / • Columns • Structural SIah • Mortar' • Groin fit All items observed appear to be in accordance with approved plans and specifications: ❑ walls • Slab-on-Grade • Asphalt • Structural Steel 4Jt' 2/ Soils • Beams 14-Soils • Fireproofing Other ❑ Other • Yes • No E) Location: OF"' RAPP r 134 %dt iW. €9 5%ID °'TWA 7 o DAILY FIELD REPORT S 00 1 5 O o c (cD c ,t 3 O GL &-71. /0605 /D /1-/C / -c - Z) A F,t.9s / >y RcPofy /c °A P47 XZ CSG L7S re / Le_ flFPrit9D o.(J RCSUC7.5 b,c Pt o c ro 2 u r 6-7?el 944 p G E� u E/1 y Nati Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road. Suite iN, Spokane. WA 09T (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 891 -?013 `( �, o, ,' C CoX9 / ; C /c> h 4 4 0E4 7 J//� w 1_9L 0 PR 0 c Z — lc°C cog 7 19 -.(5D Y l9/Qs. 4) or 7 r/A 9 6-- 7 CV/ 49 E/ ?3i ? /ES JR17/0g0/ Auks 7 o DAILY FIELD REPORT S 00 1 5 O o c (cD c ,t 3 O GL &-71. /0605 /D /1-/C / -c - Z) A F,t.9s / >y RcPofy /c °A P47 XZ CSG L7S re / Le_ flFPrit9D o.(J RCSUC7.5 b,c Pt o c ro 2 u r 6-7?el 944 p G E� u E/1 y Nati Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road. Suite iN, Spokane. WA 09T (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 891 -?013 I Function Hours Code Auks C r Total Ex pc 11,<N Cock 55 / ' Z zz3 / 3 33 4Jt' 2/ I MCI Represenmtive:.' / A Signature: 4 4 / R t�•e 1 o 7 o DAILY FIELD REPORT S 00 1 5 O o c (cD c ,t 3 O GL &-71. /0605 /D /1-/C / -c - Z) A F,t.9s / >y RcPofy /c °A P47 XZ CSG L7S re / Le_ flFPrit9D o.(J RCSUC7.5 b,c Pt o c ro 2 u r 6-7?el 944 p G E� u E/1 y Nati Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road. Suite iN, Spokane. WA 09T (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 891 -?013 Pn f 8 ! • .- L< . . •• ... a Hours ) : Project No.: •� _ \)dress: Code Total Date: 7_2 / '" 9S Weather. L $- H TTFRc/) ( Gcur (b 2 Day t,rWeek: /Wok .A) Approve) Plans on Site: ❑ Yes No C) Items Observed or Tested: Auger Cast Piles Structural Slab $lab -on-Grade Beano D) Attached Report: ❑ Footings • ❑ Concrete • Rested ❑ mortar ■ • Columns • BI All items observed appear 10 he in accordance' with approved plans and specifications: ❑ Yes • No ❑ Walls ❑ t� to ❑ Grout • : \sphelt • Structural Steel 9ISoi Is ■ Firepruullm_ • Other 01 1i e • Other _I Representative: g ` / Et Location: or it efli46' re) R Ai? Atp2 AO. CH 57P nu.Ut -- a ,,. DAILY FIELD REPORT Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road. Suite 5N. Spokane. WA 9920o (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 591 - 2 012 - S 001[1'39 Si F I Comments: ERR f /J D APY f »c. // :/s— � ( v / ' /V d ( 1 ERs OhJEUFL O dd S / i c am , IGUl) �Jh RTH1rA/\ Eivrioycr 4.un Cr-L.EE 'UOL /T`7 Co Al TR04 / OR /AJ/ 4»f) _51 1-.2 OA) 5 /rE. r4 Ler rb&D fl r 7i-HAr TNt PR C 15 o 77/6 a19 Sr w19 4 / 3 `f, b C/4/E CotilPf) c 77 04 fL r RAND 0/€4 / et 09- 7 ofl 5 to •r K A 'or i A/z AciU n/ WE 5 FE l /CLID toF-AUs/7y RE P6Rr i=oR /I -T7}. Function Hours Code Miles Code Total Expenses Code (b 2 223 / 3 33 9 , _I Representative: g ` / Signature: 49 DAILY FIELD REPORT Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road. Suite 5N. Spokane. WA 9920o (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 591 - 2 012 - S 001[1'39 Si F I Comments: ERR f /J D APY f »c. // :/s— � ( v / ' /V d ( 1 ERs OhJEUFL O dd S / i c am , IGUl) �Jh RTH1rA/\ Eivrioycr 4.un Cr-L.EE 'UOL /T`7 Co Al TR04 / OR /AJ/ 4»f) _51 1-.2 OA) 5 /rE. r4 Ler rb&D fl r 7i-HAr TNt PR C 15 o 77/6 a19 Sr w19 4 / 3 `f, b C/4/E CotilPf) c 77 04 fL r RAND 0/€4 / et 09- 7 ofl 5 to •r K A 'or i A/z AciU n/ WE 5 FE l /CLID toF-AUs/7y RE P6Rr i=oR /I -T7}. Project: q /V — eu f L FIELD DENSITY TEST REPORT Report No. S/ 63? Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N, Spokane, WA 99206 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 891 -2012 ....0.- f � _..S /6 p Dam: 2 y �/ / Day of Week M ! ,U Weather: SCAT 6CE» rc co C -ay, Test Method: �)UCLGC • n k Location of Fill: Q cF p T 6 AQ(�c RD QOM c 1 20 General Contractor: / � � � T- ( � , "•7 � ' Superintendent: t tj / C H hl Earthwork Contractor: Foreman: Teat Number Test Location Elev Proctor Number Probe Depth Test Moist Content % Test Dry Density pcf Percent Compaction Remarks r /oo r ERQA4 r'.7 Rft Sr , /0 • % / Z7 V 9 c /S7) ells% a / / 1 / /r! C e l, ! 3 /-zcf.S 9? t. E: • - // / O '' • . _ fI Proctor Number Soil Description Ma aimum Dry Density Optimum Moisture Content hlcth,d Standard /Modi Ilea ® & sE rouRSF / 3fr, (Q II i ii it cpres<mative: - - ' TE Signature: � � � � Page ,_„. . Z— Project: q /V — eu f L FIELD DENSITY TEST REPORT Report No. S/ 63? Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N, Spokane, WA 99206 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 891 -2012 , n 11111 11 11111 1 rrrn --_, _ 0 a _ _ 0 c J 111 1111 1111 1111 1111 IIII 1111 1111 1111 w 1- 0 w 1- a 0 w 140 0 135 0 L,_ 130 0 6 125 0 0 Z 110 0 a 105 ( 100 95 1 90 0 85 80 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 WATER CONTENT (PERCENT) PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk PROJECT NO: SO416 -0110 DATE: July 24, 1995 SAMPLE LOCATION: Unknown. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Light brown coarse sand with gravel. TEST PROCEDURE: ASTM D -1557, METHOD: C, Modified MOISTURE CONTENT: 6.056 DRY DENSITY: 139.5 PCF REFERENCE NO.: SL1184 REMARKS /DEVIATIONS: PROCTOR TEST RESULTS HCI Howard Consultants, Inc. PLATE CHECKED BY STA. OFFSET r DEPTH READINGS AVG. St.�O II I41.1 q2 •5 /42.7 /434 11 6-/- 2< e) . gr 141.0 141•3 Qz.O q2 74 z 1; LI __S7 • 1-(a•I q 3 64"5° /2 LT' 14s.q 144, -- c0. l6+ /4 L1 143.(. q3,q 14< 1 1384 AVG. 5 I42.7 6 12.8 STA. OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. 17s 13'/27 Al Co V -k /42.7 HI r- 11 3 ti 142.c q2 3t-2S 7 gr i42, qj.3 141.0 4 tLs 3' LT leg ,.5" 10,2 1384 5 5. P.< 1411 q 1¢l.6 AVG. )41.1- 42-. 1-1vs'54 H 25/ �rslc Iirt 2- z-4 F/,v INLAND ASPHALT CO. ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMPACTION REPORT NO. NTRACT NO. cog 3 3 I GAUGE .246 2_ SECTION 4 !vOJ AiVft 4-UL REMARKS REMARKS INSPECTOR (Ai TO ROLLER CODE: SDV = SINGLE DRUM VIBRATORY TS = TANDEM STEEL DDV = DOUBLE DRUM VIBRATORY 3WS = 3 WHEEL STEEL P = PNEUMATIC ROLLERS PASSES STA. TO STA. CONTROL LOT NO. TONS '7 ATB THICK 3 CLASS B. D. E. E. G (71) LANE: LT. OR3. NB. SB OTHER �.J lll///lll/// LEVELING WEARING STD. DENSITY RICE DENSITY / S3 . TEMP: MAT GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR STA. TO STA. CONTROL LOT NO. TONS ACP 1 ATB THICK CLASS B. D, E, F, 0 AD LANE: VR ''EB, NB, SB OTHER LEVELING WEARING STD. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR STREET INSPECTOR DISTRIBUTION: WHITE - FILE CANARY - SUPT. PINK - O.A. PROJECT ENGINEER /9lr// r r CONTRACTOR ' DATE AIR - 7/ , 1 AIR J RICE DENSITY Sq N PAGE r OF L PAGES. IA-6 REV. 6/89 STA. OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. / roo 7 LT /3RS i34,g 1 57 E 57 .z t o p i 9 Rr 8 f �';I, / 37. - $ 7 - - 3 -,- 9' fir /3R i' /3 70 3 9 f oo 4r /37.! 85 S o o S` i t i38 -- / 3Y. s ?o AVG. e `, / 25 HYS 2S/ 6/90A.0 z Z t ,cam INLAND ASPHALT CO. ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMPACTION REPORT CONTRACT IAC NO NO. fJ " /�/ ,/ SECTION /-� oL' y STA. AVG. OFFSET DEPTH READINGS . AVG. REMARKS ROLLER CODE: SDV = SINGLE DRUM VIBRATORY TS = TANDEM STEEL DDV = DOUBLE DRUM VIBRATORY 3WS = 3 WHEEL STEEL P = PNEUMATIC GAUGE PROJECT NO. ENGINEER r L ' `' ILI ?o S STA. CONTROL LOT NO. CLASS LANE: ORR ; 613, WEN , SB OTHER LEVELING STD. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR REMARKS: STA. TO STA CONTROL LOT NO. ACP ATB THICK CLASS B. 0, E, F, G LANE: LT. OR RT. ; EB, WB, NB. SB OTHER LEVELING STD. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT TONS ATB THICK 11 B. D, E. F, G GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR DISTRIBUTION: WHITE- FILE CANARY- SUPT. PINK - O.A. WEARING RICE DENSITY AIR DATE TO STA. WEARING RICE DENSITY fS AIR s C� TONS INSPECTOR / ) r 4 Ail . STREET INSPECTOR CONTRACTOR PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGES. IA.6 REV. 6/89 STA. OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. 6 4-5-_S-- 7' L r /Volt , yo_( � � C-0 /39. / '40 i 3 3' it z s ' 4r 1 _ y'D , / 7t 7 ° _/39, (38, $ 70 y 315.0 ?'RT /37,3 7 7 / g taro /z, / /30.s 90 3 C i 7i-CV // L7- ' L / l l, S' /f R 8 9 2 S' -9-SD /s' c. r / /'Rr /3 & z / D rS"0 /3 9 D 90 AVG. 90 g1 STA. OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. Z 4- /Z /?t /• s � � C-0 `r" / '40 i 3 9� _ 2t5- b s ' 4r 1 _ y'D , / 7 ° /3R,/ 315.0 e'RI /93. � 7 7 / /z, / tro /s' 2r / Sz /17<Z,i S' -9-SD /s' c. r /'z,r 9 AVG. 77 7 Pit ZS ,/ 257 6RLiov Z Z 4- A mi N? 25 HYS zs/ C At'o» INLAND ASPHALT CO. ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMPACTION REPORT CONTRACT IAC GAUGE PROJECT NO. NO. NO. ENGINEER SECTION _7 )D//o,of) Au e REMARKS: REMARKS ROLLER CODE: SDV = SINGLE DRUM VIBRATORY TS = TANDEM STEEL DDV = DOUBLE DRUM VIBRATORY 3WS = 3 WHEEL STEEL P = PNEUMATIC CU To L= 6-/6-9s DATE STA. TO STA. CONTROL LOT NO. TONS ATB THICK 3 ' CLASS B, D, E, F, G //�� LANE: W/OR49; GO NB, SB OTHER LEVELING STD. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR STA CONTROL LOT NO A CLASS 8. D, E, F, G LANE.�OFC OTHER LEVELING STD. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR DISTRIBUTION: WHITE - FILE CANARY - SUPT. PINK - O.A. C , INSPECTOR A, STREET INSPECTOR CONTRACTOR WEARING III ?? RICE DENSITY /57 AIR NB, SB AIR 70 TO STA. TONS ATB THICK WEARING RICE DENSITY /.7 7, l o o PAGE 2. OF '3 PAGES. IA -6 REV. 6/89 Asphalt and Cement Concrete Testing Results Jerry: Thanks 707 West 701 • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. MEMORANDUM Date: June 12, 1996 To: Jerry Peterson From: Todd R. Whippl Subject: Riverwalk 1st Addition - Construction Inspection W.O. No. 96106 Per our conversation earlier today, I have enclosed a map with the approximate locations of the • coring samples for the above referenced project shown. These locations have been spray painted in the field with the white paint that you provided. Try to have the curb & gutter core taken approximately in the middle of the gutter pan section. The sidewalk cores should be taken on the white dots only (self explanatory in the field). If you have any questions regarding what testing is required please see me, or if you know the program you want followed please write it up and submit it to me with a copy to the file. 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 -765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 �� \ y. • / • \\ SQ ' \ :[7 2 z �' 8. \ r _ ' 1 .2 1 1 r L — ' %� a ? it ADD A , - r .. \ 58 dial GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. 6 \%P% Geotechnical Engineers PU Cj 2 2020 E. Springfield • Spokane, WA 99202 • Telephone (509) 534 -3670 • Fax 534 -2925 \ � - August 27, 1996 • Dean - Housley Corporation c/o Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc 707 W. Seventh Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 Attn: Mr. Todd Whipple, P.E. RESULTS OF MEASUREMENTS AND BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY TESTING OF ASPHALT CONCRETE CORES, RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON Attached are the results of measurements and bulk specific gravity testing of asphalt concrete cores you provided from the Rivenvalk First Addition site. The testing was accomplished in general accordance with our confirming letter of August 12, 1996, which you authorized on August 16, 1996. The cores,•each approximately 3.7 inches in diameter, were delivered to our office by Spokane Concrete Cutting . on August 6, 1996: Our work included measuring the length of each core to the closest 0.1 inch and conducting bulk specific gravity testing (ASTM D 2726) on each of them. Results are summarized on the attached Table 1. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions about the results, please let us know. Sincerely, GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Grant R. Cummings, P.E.. P.C.. Senior Engineer Ends: Table 1 Allen B. Gifford, P.E. President Allen B. Gifford, P.E. President E- 1718 -02 7P crib CC: List ;f:. GO TABLE 1 Bulk Core Specific Number Gravity Density (pcf) Length (in.) 1 2.37 147.9 3.4 2 2.21 137.9 3.4 3 2.32 144.8 3.2 4 2.32 144.8 2.8 5 2.33 145.4 2.8 6 2.37 147.9 3.0 7 2.29 142.9 2.8 8 2.35 146.6 3.4 E- 1718 -02 GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers 2020 E. Springfield • Spokane, WA 99202 • Telephone (509) 534 -3670 • Fax 534 -2925 Dean- 1- lousley Corporation c/o Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. 707 W. Seventh Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson, P.E. Project Manager Allen B. Gifford. P.E. President July 12, 1996 RESULTS OF UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TESTING, RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION CONCRETE CORES, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON E- 1718 -01 Attached are the results of measurements and compression testing of concrete cores you provided from the Riverwalk First Addition site. The testing was accomplished in general accordance with our proposal of June 19, 1996, which was authorized by Mr. Mark Hancock, on July 1, 1996. The cores, as delivered to our lab, ranged in diameter from 1.73 to 1.74 inches and in length from 2.4 to 5.6 inches. Cores that were sufficiently long to yield a test specimen having a length- to- diameter•ratio of about 2 were - trimmed and tested for unconfined compressive strength. Of the 37 cores delivered, 25 were tested. Dean Housley Corporation c/o Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. July 12, 1996 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions about the results, please let us know. Sincerely, GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Allen B. Gifford, P.E. President Encl: Table 1 - Concrete Core Lengths Table 2 - Concrete Core Compressive Strength Invoice E- 1718 -01 Page 2 TABLE 1 CONCRETE CORE LENGTHS Average Length Before Trimming Core (Inches) A 3.6 B 3.8 C 2.4 U 33 E 19 F 3.4 G 12 H 3.4 1 4.2 J 4.0 K 2.7 L 4.6 M 4.0 N 4.5 O 13 P 3.6 Q 5.3 R 3.4 1 5.2 2 5.4 3 5.3 4 5.0 5 5.0 6 5.0 7 5.6 8 5.0 8 (Alt.) 5.5 9 4.3 10 5.9 11 5.5 12 5.0 13 4.8 14 5.0 15 5.0 16 5.0 17 5.0 18 5.0 E- 1718 -01 0 c M cD r r V N (D CO N m O M r O r V m O c0 CO CO O m N O 0) O O O N O O 00O000 (O r N r r r r r r r r N r r r r ....... r r r 0 0) 2 w — :E 0 r N M V L') (0 r m O O r N M V L7 (0 r m W CO N CO L'1 O M r CO O N O V (D O O N m r O V) O V r r V M V r N r m V N V r O r V O 6 CO M (0 tO r r V m M O O M V L0 O N O r co V co V m CO O V M O LO m N 0 r V (D O N CO O LO V (0 C (D V N h r r r r O CO r m CJ (D r CO CO r m r m m 0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0) 04 0 (0 0 04 0 (0 0 (0 04 ('4 0 0410 0 0 0 0 0 0) (0 0 0 r (0 0) M (0 M V N O(0 L') N N r N (0 (0 m L') (0 = N O N V V r M ..... r r N m m N O N O O m r O O r O m O O r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 0 ✓ Z r (O V N N r V m O N ONO) N r M N m N N V M N r r L r r N (0 O N r (D r O r (D O r m (O V (O O r L7 CO V O V r tD W 0) N r V r m O V r (D N N (0 V r r M r CO O O V m m CC l� '0 V V V V M M V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V CO — r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r V _ W D O (D N M N O O V (0 M (0 N O N O r r O V m 0 E mrN(O(Or O ONONMM V (0 r(O V M Omm V LO N m O r m m (1) (D V M V) (0 V r N M N M m (0 (0 M (0 m NO E m M O r 4.0 m O (0 0 0 r of m r r O O co o r 0 N r o O Ne w co m r`t`ro r: co mof N` co rn m co r mco 06 m co rn (D N W E) W > a r 0 0 0 V V m O (0 r 0 (D o m 0 o O N r m 0 m O Mc a r (O (D r- N- n (0 (0 (D r- (n (0 (0 N- (0 r r N- N N- N- 10 N'- 1- N- r M • GGC M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M H O Q N N N N N N N Sr N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U O O m (D tO (O (O 06000100606660 C 0 LO m m m m N- r (0 m t0 (D (0 m (0 m O m m m O m O m O m W 0 7 10100101010(0 m (O(0 (010 m (Or (0(0O(0(Or- (ON-(O m m m m m m m 0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m CC a a • o 0 0 o 0 o o 666666666666666666 W U . 0 O O r r N- N 0 N r O N O r N r O r r r m 0 0 r O r (0(0(0(0(0(0(0 (0(0 M M M M M M V M M M M M V M V M W .. • r--r-- . rrrr-r-rrrr 1— ,2 E r rrrrr r CC 0 M m L7 (O r (010 M M O O r O V 0 0 0 m r 0 M V N O m U V m r N O M 0 U') O N (0 V r V N m O O r V M (O V O M Z �.. M (D V V N M V N M V V M M V V M C M V V C V V V O . 41 rn ........, ... m r+. M M M m M M ei M M c'i M ri M M M M M M N O m (0 N CO (D N r r V) r r CO V 0 CO V O M M O (0 m (0 CO ✓ m r CO O CO r u) (0 r CO L O (0 0 0 0) 10 0) 0) 10 CO 0 0 r CO m m(O(OOO m(O (D mM CO m m mm(O(O CO LO r (O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 6 o o o 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 N r V (0 m N (D V O N CO r M 0 10 0 r V V m r CO 0 m V ✓ (V (0 r V m V 6 O (D r m N (t) N r 0 m V O N m (D O O r O O r m 0 0 0 0 O O r O r O r r N O r N M M M N N CO N CO C O M C V C O M M M M M M M M M M M N r N M V N m r m 0) ...... ('4 V (0 (D 0 10 0 rn 0 Q Misc. Drainage Calculations 1: / a avY1a9 s, 71A. = - o ► 7 2. oS. T3M A 2, n4- fsn : 2. V\ vow, y� 4 e Circular Channel Analysis & Design Solved with Manning's Equation Worksheet Name: RIVERWALK 1ST Comment: CULVERT ON INDIANA Solve For Actual Discharge Open Channel - Uniform flow Given Input Data: Diameter 1.00 ft Slope 0.0133 ft /ft Manning's n 0.013 Depth 0.50 ft Computed Results: Discharge 2.05 cfs Velocity 5.23 fps Flow Area 0.39 sf Critical Depth 0.61 ft Critical Slope 0.0069 ft /ft Percent Full 50.00 a Full Capacity 4.11 cfs QMAX @.94D 4.42 cfs Froude Number 1.47 (flow is Supercritical) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.41 (c) 1991 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 Circular Channel Analysis & Design Solved with Manning's Equation Worksheet Name: RIVERWALK 1ST Comment: CULVERT ON INDIANA Solve For Full Flow Capacity Open Channel - Uniform flow Given Input Data: Diameter 1.00 ft Slope 0.0133 ft /ft Manning's n 0.013 Discharge 4.11 cfs Computed Results: Full Flow Capacity 4.11 cfs Full Flow Depth 1.00 ft Velocity 5.23 fps Flow Area 0.79 sf Critical Depth 0.86 ft Critical Slope 0.0124 ft /ft Percent Full 100.00 % Full Capacity 4.11 cfs QMAX @.94D 4.42 cfs Froude Number FULL Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.41 (c) 1991 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 ri, :r E .... s•111• a':.. . ,!f.; ,715• , %_ . - 3; '. i'71 :' , DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer May 1, 1998 Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. 707 West 7' Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, Wa 99204 A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E-, Director Att: Bruce Howard Re: Riverwalk PUD 1` Addition: Construction Certification Acceptance Dear Bruce, Please be advised the construction certification documentation and certified record drawings for Riverwalk 1' Addition (P1414) are accepted by the Engineering Division. The irrigation manual and irrigation as -built record drawings are also accepted. The process that formally establishes the roadways for County maintenance will be - initiated at this time. - Jim Radke, P.E. Engineering Services cc: Ed Dean 1026 W Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX'. (509) 324 -3478 TDD1 (509) 324 -3166 11c DATE: tilts ?_S rn . COMPANY: c.na`t 7 PROJECT NAME: ?I NJ \, 4-27 �Dtrra_r. INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Telephone: (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 FAX TRANSMITTAL NO. OF PAGES: 3 (including cover page) TO: M \Nl-.: V-LA k-A . FAX #: 2ov - -7 -7Z - Zc 1 PHONE #: Z_Dt.; - S - 310 FROM: zac:.r. JOB ti: ORIGINAL IN MAIL• ❑ YES 1"` NO NOTES: 1Y--C - f t 1n1s ��Ir7 'nh6. /C c �Sz FL - Jcz•IUSr och2 l� 2 tr -nv. Erie° A COP o- 'T)-ti c o 3; Lt._ -c- 5G h Iva: am C it- Getz -z- m -A-7 Liu S REV. 5/97 O:\FORMS \FAXSHEEF. W PD June 6, 1997 Mr. Verne Jacobsen Dean Housley Company 16720 N.E. 116 Street Redmond, Washington 98052 Dear Verne: i re INLAND PACIF C ENGINEERING, INC. Re: Riverwalk 1s Addition - Construction Deficiency List Public Improvements This letter transmits a list of construction items for the above referenced residential development that are currently in non - conformance with the approved projects plans and specifications and applicable Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. These items must be corrected prior to finalization of project record drawings, and prior to calling for final inspection and acceptance of the construction by the County Engineer's office as well as any bond reductions. This letter is based on items observed during a site visit on June 3, 1997 and is limited to areas of the improvements whose adequacy could be visually determined at the time of our visit. This list of observed deficiencies in project construction is intended to serve as input to help you achieve project acceptance by Spokane County. The absence of constructed items from this list in no way implies that any unlisted item(s) have been approved or are approvable under current County Standards. By copy of this letter, we are notifying the County Engineer's staff that we have requested compliance on the issues listed below. Please contact us when the above deficiencies have been corrected, so that we can proceed with the project certification and acceptance by Spokane County in a timely manner. General Deficiencies 1) Sweep and clean all sidewalks, curb and gutter, and streets of all debris and excess sand and gravel. 2) Post construction bond for amount of $1,950.00 per Ed Parry letter. Re: Red paver brick instead of concrete brick used for vertical adjustment. 3) Confirm acceptance of retaining wall on the sidewalk, north side of Indiana, approximate station 4 +00. Storm Drainage 1) Sod and irrigate pond in Tract "C ", Riverwalk r Addition, due to acceptance of public drainage. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458.6640 • FAX: 509-458-6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 - 765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 9L4 Riverwalk Page 2 Pavement 1) Compact base course and pave asphalt adjacent to concrete cross gutter at Indiana and McMillan Lane. Sidewalk 1) Remove and replace approximately 4 panels of sidewalk on the north side of Indiana west of H.C. ramp at approximate station 5 +00. Sidewalk has settled and created a lip between the sidewalk and the curb. 2) Remove and replace 2 panels of sidewalk around the U.S. West manhole due to settlement, and lip between the curb and sidewalk. Approximate Indiana station 4 +20, left. 3) Remove and replace 1 panel of sidewalk, approximate Indiana station 3 +50, right. Sidewalk has crack. 4) Patch and grout around the H.C. ramp at the west side of Indiana and McMillan Lane. Curb and Gutter 1) Remove and replace broken curb and gutter on Indiana, approximate station 2 +60, right. 2) Remove and replace broken curb and gutter on Indiana, approximate station 4 +40, right. 3) Remove and replace broken curb and gutter at the west curb retum on Indiana and Harmony. 4) Remove and replace curb return at the west intersection of Harmony Lane and Mission Avenue. If you have any questions or would like to schedule inspections and testing of any concrete pours, please give me a call. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. /er PL4i,1 Bruce A. Howard Principal cc: Spokane County Engineers Office .4:4246 . ':' is '; 40` ,.: In &\' I L - . % ° N 5 n . N o. 6.12 No ' N 7 642 Post -it• Fax Note 7671 oate5 / I a of . 3 pa To i / p AG‘ /� Calm 1717 7 From ( `l • of...- Co. 1 � Phone�f R) 965. 3969 7 Phone( ) 955, 4 le Fax ( 1` I.OW) 94 2. 2 5 7 Fax # ( ) ' 1� o qt Riverwalk 1st From: Parry, Ed To: 'Todd Whipple, P.E.' Cc: 'Mark Hancock' Subject: Riverwalk 1st Date: Friday, May 23, 1997 13:05:27 I was out to Riverwalk 1st this morning to look at the stuff in Janelle's letter from 22 May 97. This letter contained the items that you said you would provide in our 12 May phone conversation. 1. Pond A. What's been done so far (sideslope repairs in the lower part of the swale around the drywell) appears reasonable. the disturbed areas all need to have established vegetation. There is still some work to be done at the back of the curb inlets where the old riprap was removed, and to ensure that the tops of the check dam elevations are all 6" above the upstream swale floors 2. Pond F: So far, so good. The disturbed areas need to have the vegetation re- established. Have the elevations between the edge of pavement, CB rim, and floor been verified for conformance? 3. Pond B: A nice - looking fix around the drywell. The sod that installed is dead, or nearly so. 4. Pond C: Have the elevations between the edge of pavement, CB rim, and floor been verified for conformance? Post -it• Fax Note 7871 Post -it` Fax Note 7671 Date s /.� Im T/ To qv/ lit Jtichb, C.r`, From JtA Iit- s lk rA :PO; 1 Co D o 1 re— » e ' ((1O » 4 s 4 - 47 9 Fax# / .. cc 1 't- . Fax» 491; q014 FAX COVER SHEET SPOKANE COUNTY- ENCMEERs 2ad FLOOR FAX • (509) X4 -7655 PRONE a (509)324.765: 1026 W. BROADWAY SPOKANE, WA 99260 PRONE 0(509)4a-um V11..JVYsJ WC IL I tt C.SJV.fl' DATE: 23 May 97 TO: Todd Whipple, P.E. FAX #: 458 COMPANY: 1WE CITY/STATE: TO: Mark Hancock FAX ft: 206/8694620 COMPANY: Dean Housley Co. CITY/STATE: - NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): FROM: _Ed Parry. P.F. . (Plats Review, x257) SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk 1st Major Items of Work Remaining r. us Todd/Mark: Mark's letter of 22 May 97 indicated that a Final Inspection bas been scheduled for 28 May 97. Was it intended for the County to attend that abo? These arc the major Items that I can think of off the top of my head. More items may be turned up as the result of a Final Inspection by the County. I mentioned most of these to Brian Housley when he called me yesterday. P1414 - Riverwalk 1st -- � (1.througk - gfo ,certain will need to be completed prior to acceptance of lndiiana) • 1. Mitigation payment for out-of -spec materials (Clay parer brick used to adjust CB rim at 11 +24 LT): Need ( .../. payment of 51950 from Developer's side of the project In lieu of rework J. Irritation system Record Drawings: Still need . Sidewalk repair On North side of Indiana: Replace about a duress panels between the radius point of the Keystone wall and the sidewalk ramp at the westerly side of Harmony /Indiana (damage by phone co., settling) 4. Sidewalk repair on South side of Indiana: About 2 or 3 panels to replace (cracked or settling) 5. Establish vegetation in dint' rbed areas of males A, B. F 6. Fix cross - gutter, curb returns. and sidewalk at Indiana/McMillan (failed flow test, concrete is cracking) 7. Verify elp, rim and flour elevations in swab F & Bring all Invoices up to date, not just those over 30 days 9. Verify rework of Mission Avenue sidewalk Riverwalk Major work items - Indiana Avenue Page 2 These are some Items !noticed when 1 drove through the rite this morning: P1414A - Rivefwalk 2nd 1. Establish vegetation in swain receiving runoff from Indiana 2. Irrigation system Record Drawings: Still need 3. Remove 'eyebrow" temporary turnaround at Indiana/Snake River Lana Thli was supposed to happen when Indiana was extended - please refer to the Design Deviation for the Snake River entry/temporary turnaround 4. Check/replace sidewalk/curb- rind to field check 5. Bring gill invokes up to date, not just those over JO days P141413 - Riverwalk 3rd 1. Complete work in males receiving runoff from Indiana 2. Irrigation system Record Drawings: Still need 3. Bring ajj invoices up to date, not just those over 30 days TOTAL P.02 May 22, 1997 W.O. 96106 W.M. Winkler Co. E. 1822 Fairview Spokane, WA 99207 Attn: Jim Winkler Re: Riverwalk P.U.D. 1" Addition Dear Jim, Per our conversation this afternoon, you asked us to schedule staking for the cross - gutter at Indiana & McMillan. You said that your crew would rip out the cross - gutter Tuesday morning and then IPE's survey crew could stake it. The entire cross - gutter needs to be ripped out to be properly constructed as designed. We will mark the area to be removed prior to your work. 1 have scheduled the staking with our survey crew for 11:00 am on Tuesday, May 27 1997. Verne has also notified us that you would be replacing a portion of sidewalk on Indiana that was damaged by US WEST. You will not be able to remove and replace the sidewalk in one day. When you remove the sidewalk, we will need to do a proctor and perform a density test, and verify the 4" thickness prior to pouring. Verne said you would be removing the sidewalk on Tuesday. We will perform our test that day and notify you when the tests have passed and you can repour the sidewalk. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering At- anelle Poe,:E.I.T. JDP /jdp cc: Verne Jacobsen/FAX irc INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509 - 458.6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 -765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 2� 199_ till 4 '�t P r � K A r--; E N ' r C C� U N m Y A DIVISION CF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Gentlemen: Dtv:510y OF -NGINE :RING AND ROADS [Vil!iam A. }onus. P.E., County Engineer D. -nnis M. Scott, P.E.. Director May 19. i997 Mark Hancock Stanton Development /Dean Housely Company 16720 N.E. () 1 1 16th Street • }Y Bellevue. A 98052 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Addition Mitigation for Clay Paver .Adjustment Brick - Indiana Avenue We have discussed the issue of the use of clay paver brick for adjusting the frame elevation on the catch basin at station 1 = 24(Lt) on Indiana Avenue. As you now know. clay paver brick are not an acceptable material for this purpose. The County Standards specify a cement brick. and our maintenance crews have found that the clay brick do not hold up as well as the cement brick. Although the clay brick apparently have a higher compressive strength than the cement brick, the clay brick are more brittle, and do not last as long as cement brick. Ramer than risk tearing up Indiana .Avenue at this time. the County Engineer has decided to accept the clay paver brick dr this location only. his acceptance is conditioned on the payment of the amount necessary to cover the County's cost for the eventual repair of this catch basin due to the failure of the adjustment rings. Given the County's estimate of the costs to make the repairs today. and considering inflation and the rate of return the County anticipates on the principal. this amount is $1950.00. This mitigation payment would not supersede any other required warranties. Any repairs that become necessary within the warranty period would still be covered under the ' section of the Standards. Please let us know when we can expect this payment. Please contact Ed Parry at (509)456 -3600 if you have any questions in this matter. Very truly yours. Post - it° Fax Note William A. Johns. P. E. Spokane Cowtty Engineer 61 ? c. Edward J.`Par"ry, Jr.. P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: project the reviewer Todd Whipple, P.E., Inland Pacific Engineering, 707 West 7th Avenue. Suite 200. Spokane, WA 99204 1026W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane. WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3475 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 May 19, 1997 W.O. No.96106 Dean - Dieley Company 16720 NE 116th Street Redmond, WA 98052 Attn: Ed Dean, President Re: Riverwalk, 1st Construction Dear Ed: 707 West 711i • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509.458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Via Facsimile - 2 (two) Pages Total This is short note to bring you quickly up to speed on developments over the last week at Riverwalk. 1. On Thursday, May 15, 1997, Pat Harper from Spokane County called to inform me that the Spokane County engineers will not be forwarding the plats of Riverwalk 4th or 5th to the commissioners for final platting. This is contrary to a meeting that both Mark Hancock and I attended wherein Bill Johns indicated that he would allow the plats to move forward. The reasoning for this is that they have not seen substantial movement in completing the punch list items and bringing the construction to a conclusion. (( 1Z L.0 . 1 s4 ) - 2. In regards to the previous statement, it appears that NO CONSTRUCTION ITEMS WERE PERFORMED in cleaning up the remaining items in the Indiana right of way such as final sodding or concrete pouring. This also includes a final schedule for the replacement of the cross gutter. 3. On the lighter side, no further pond improvements are required on the large pond along Indiana. It appears after recalculating and measuring the plan volume as shown by North Idaho was inaccurate and was for a larger storm event. Therefore, only minor work need to be accomplished and no utility relocations are required. 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208 -769 -7277 May 19, 1997 Page 2 Lastly, thank you for finally assigning Vern to help finish this project. I now feel that we have someone who may be motivated toward closure. He has been coordinating very well with Janelle of our office on this matter and I appreciate this. Please get back to me on K.C.'s schedule for completion. As soon as it is ready, I have Ed Parry ready to do a quick walk through so that 4th and 5th can proceed. Sincerely, Inland Pacific ineering Co., Inc. Todd R. Whipple, P.E. TRW /tw cc: file 05/1.9/1997 08:41 Washington Water Power Spokane Construction Fax Cover Memo Fax #: (509) 482-4 on Post-le Fax Note Date: Mav 1 Number of Pages: TO: Fax #: 458 -6844 Copies to: 5094824120 FROM: Frank Meland Development Coordinator (509) 482 -4270 SPO CONT Janelle Poe Company: Inland Pacific Engineering Phone #: X FYI Immediate Reply Requested Remarks: Rich Garcia's number is 4824090 PAGE 01 PM ' .: ti z id I file6 CC: List Initials Washington WaterPower Washington Water Pow( 1411 East Mission P.O. Box 3727 Spokane, Washington 99220 -3737 1800- 727 -9170 509 489-0500 Telephone Inland Pacific Engineering 707 W. 7th Ave. Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Attn.: Janelle Poe Dear Janelle, ve- fteCi If( 2019 RE: Riverwalk 1st Pond Revisions May 19, 1997 I reviewed the site with the plans you left at our front desk on May 14th. The following information is only as good as the locates and staking indicate. Any gas or electric utilities within four feet of excavation should be pot -holed for final assessment. I also looked at the pond on Indiana, east of Barker. I am concerned that this existing pond does not have adequate cover. Any construction required to relocate our facilities will be billed for material cost and labor on an overtime rate. At this point, based on your preliminary plans, a deposit of $8,000.00 would be required, with the balance to be billed after construction is complete. Please be aware that what may appear to be a minor change in location of our facilities may involve substantial costs. For example, a change to primary conductor location may demand that an entire span of new conductor be installed in the conduit, (primary conductor is not spliced in conduit). - • Basin Pond G - The location of the bottom of pond appears to be approximately 2 feet from our primary conductor according to the locates. Keep in mind that the locates are assumed to vary 2 feet in either direction. Even if the locate mark is accurate, the back of the retaining wall would be set one foot from our primary conductor or gas main. The minimum distance here should be 2 feet (preferably 3 feet) from the back of the retaining wall. -n?w 9G /o 6'' :'c: Lis. iniiialS • Basin Pond M - Changes in this area appear adequate to protect our facilities and maintain enough cover to meet minimum code requirements. • Basin Pond M2 (at the northwest corner of Baldwin and McMillan) - Construction of the drywell will probably interfere with all utilities in that area. The location of utilities appears to be closer to the pond bottom than your drawing indicates at the easterly end of the pond. In either case, this entire section of electric line within the pond area, from the transformer west to the junction box north, then south to the transformer on McMillan will have to be lowered. The gas main and services in the immediate area will also need to be lowered. • Basin Pond 0 - Changes in this area appear to be outside of our utility location. • Basin Pond I's - The widening of these two ponds will reduce the cover 'over our service lines to the four houses that border them. The retaining walls may require changes in the riser pipes to the gas meter locations. Please maintain grading around our electric box in these areas as we discussed. The cost of changes to these service lines will not be as substantial as the primary lines, but the safety issues are the same. As with all these concerns, all these lines should be pot -holed to assure minimum compliance. Please send me a copy of your final plans for this project as soon as they are available for further evaluation. Please call me 482 -4270 if you have any questions. Rich Garcia in our construction department will coordinate the lowering of our facilities with you once your plans are finalized. You should contact US West and TCI for their requirements. Frank Meland, Construction Coordinator cc: Vem Jacobsen Rich Garcia I PE INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Telephone - (509) 458 -6840 FAX - (509) 458 -6844 NOTES: • DATE / ` th7 : S,., w ; k ler TO: �il w;.0k\- . COMPANY: 17' ▪ FAX NUMBER: J oovt -11ciP0-e__, • FROM: • NUMBER OF PAGES: INCL COVER PAGE �(e_asc- be Sry'e_ -40 vs us o+ kas-f' -k1.a An t pr tbY { pu r Sn v-�e C 11e\MQ o— Cc freSC.tA_A iiv pre-Se � :1 ^ o rel, t.tl2 CO4& D LAX C_Ye U.) "� Vire -fir WMI ► t�tt e,vo s5 - WI �+' home- O 1A O, eTIAS rat 7 FAX TRANSMISSION • g4 JOB NUMBER • •. cvv•ol i ' p • y gC�(r�Q 1�'l 4 4- S U . t,J.. - at uttdo vs- iatkoViAl. t as iheA- PL 11 14)( fe" 4SCA > c 4» 01.0 `L M r1� mn SWotja,th, 1 a 1� 't n,,AD,n, a4"41.. `{ c a Ybss- -E k.' a +ite_ 5a„ +irnc_ - Vekr,c sack -b retuipv4 Y ak " yenA hea4 -(a 4row-e_ 0. FM - 6 ()mar *le._ u)Jk y r aA&S Vo tilt< . Q VY.•.t) Ve - Cllr. May 13, 1997 IPE W.O. #96106 Spokane County Public Works Department Development Engineering Services 1026 W Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 Attn: Ed Parry, Jr., P.E. Dear Ed: • irr INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Re: Riverwalk 1st Addition (P1414 -A) Revised Basin A Calculations Upon reviewing the original drainage basin map for Riverwalk i' and subsequent site visits, it came to our attention that the '208' volume required for runoff from impervious areas and the actual area of impervious road surface did not match. It appears that North Idaho Engineering may have included sidewalk area in their '208' requirements which, under Spokane County Guidelines, is not necessary. Therefore, we are submitting revised calculations for Basin A for the impervious road area only for '208' treatment. Enclosed please find the plan and profile sheet for Indiana from the Record Drawing set with the impervious area delineated and a revised bowstring calculation. Also attached is a copy of the original Basin A from the original drainage report, and the original '208' /Bowstring calculation. 'Please review these calculations and respond as quickly as possible so that Indiana Avenue can be closer to being inspected by Spokane County for acceptance. Please do not hesitate to call -with any questions or if any further information is needed. Thank you. Sinter ly, Inlan d Todd R. Whipple, P.E TRW /jdp Enc. ng 'Company, cc: file Vern Jacobsen, Dean-Deily Company 707 West 7th • Suite 200 - Spokanc, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 ' s 4 s • • z 7 k, 2746` - �c fs,rr ES Q 0 1V C B ( EXPIRES 9/24/ 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene. ID 83814 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208 -769 -7277 J Dmewul%61061revara CURVE RADIUS LENGTH TA N5ENT DELTA RI 20.00' 31.43' 20.01' 90•0152' R2 20.00' 31.44' 19.99' 89•56'08' R3 30.00' 40.10' 2369' 16'3513' R4 22.00' 3138' 2525' 91•5261' R5 25.00' 3653' 24.27' 88•1860' Rb 20.00' 33.98' 22.14' 91•20'24' R7 22.00' 3436' 2200' 90•00'00' RB 22.00' 3456' 22.00' 90'0060' - Pcnot A s(o . 75‘ (ad) + s 4 C Z0 J l i 2 i c t- 10sOic 112_41- ler ( IDS . CP =: R'd ' tog' . VOAwvnt ?TN-a Fie lrn.■ = UO3 + SF . Fr. V0-1 R A C.$)+ (03 2 • %(.37S) z S)c f + 2sz. 10cog Q-F i o &,ct ckO ok •� IP E Inland MEMO ❑ PROJECT Pacific CALC. ❑ JOB N0 SHEET OF_ Engineering MEETING ❑ BY DATE West 707 7th, Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 OTHER ❑ CHK'D BY DATE 509458 -6840 Fax No. 509458-6844 - PEAK FLOW CALCULATION PROJECT Rlverwalk 1st Addition BASIN: Revised A Tot. Area Imp. Area C = CASE 1 CASE 2 1.07 Acres 21724 SF 0.60 23 ft. Overland Flow Ct = L= n= 3= 0.15 23 ft. 0.40 0.005 Tc = 2.78 min., by Equation 3-2 of Guidelines Time Time Inc. Intens. Q Devel. Vol.ln Vol.Out Storage 560 ft. Gutter flow { „ ; ^?^` (min) (sec) (in/hr) (efs) (cu ft) (cu ft) (cu ft) Z1 = 50.0 For Z2c);= a..�.) , 8.20 492 2.48 1.59 1050 492 558 <__ Z2= 1 Type B =1.0 n = 0.016 Rolled = 3.5 S = 0.008 d= 0.190 ft A R 0 Tc Tc total I Oc 0.92 0.09 1.59 5.41 8.20 2.48 1.59 Qpeak for Case 1 = 1.59 cfs Case 2 assumes a Time of Concentration less than 5 minutes so that the peak flow = .90(3.18)(Imp. Area) = 1.43 cfs So, the Peak flow for the Basin is the greater of the two flows, 1.59 cfs BOWSTRING METHOD DETENTION BASIN DESIGN 10 -Year Design Storm Time Increment (min) 5 Time of Conc. (min) 8.20 Outflow (cfs) 1 Design Year Flow 10 Area (acres) 1.07 Impervious Area (sq ft) 21724 'C' Factor 0.6 '208' Volume Provided 1069 Area • C 0.642 5 300 3.18 2.04 821 300 521 10 600 2.24 1.44 1103 I 600 503 15 900 1.77 1.14 1213 900 313 20 1200 1.45 0.93 1273 1200 73 25 1500 1.21 0.78 1295 1500 -205 30 1800 1.04 0.87 1313 1800 -487 35 2100 0.91 0.58 1325 1 2100 -775 40 2400 0.82 0.53 1351 2400 -1049 45 2700 0.74 0.48 1382 2700 -1338 50 3000 0.68 0.44 1383 3000 - -1817 55 3300 0.64 0.41 1425 1 3300 -1875 60 3600 0.61 0.39 1475 3600 -2125 65 3900 0.60 0139 1567 3900 -2333 70 4200 0.58 0.37 1626 4200 -2574 75 4500 0.56 0.36 1678 4500 -2822 80 4800 0.53 0.34 1690 4800 -3110 85 5100 0.52 0.33 1758 5100 -3342 90 5400 0.50 0.32 1787 5400 -3613 95 5700 0.49 0.31 1846 5700 -3854 100 6000 0.48 0.31 1900 6000 -4100 208' DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Required '208' Storage Volume = Impervious Area x.5 in / 12 in/ft 208' Storage Volume Provided DRYWELL REQUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN STOR Maximum Storage Required by Bowstring Number and Type of Drywells Required PROJECT: Rhrerwalk 1st Addition BASIN: Revised A DESIGNER: J.D. Poe DATE: 05/13/97 905 cu ft 1069 cu ft 558 cu ft 0 Single 1 Double T PEAK FLOW CALCULATION PROJECT Rlverwalk FIrst Addition BASIN: A Tot. Area Imp. Area C= CASE 1 1.07 Acres 27960 SF 0.60 23 ft. Overland Flow Ct = L= n= S= Tc = 2.78 min., by Equation 3 -2 of Guidelines 160 ft. Gutter flow 21 = 22 = n= S= 0.15 23 ft. 0.40 0.005 50.0 1 0.016 0.005 d = 0.228 ft. A R O Tc Tc total 1.33 = 0.11 2.04 1.73 Qpeak for Case 1 = 2.04 cfs CASE 2 For Z2 Type O= 1.0 Rolled = 3.5 5.00 3.18 2.04. Case 2 assumes a Time of Concentration less than 5 minutes so that the peak flow =.90(3.18)(Imp. Area) = 1.84 cfs So, the Peak flow for the Basin Is the greater of the two n`ows, 2.04 els NORTH ICAF10 ENGINEERING Oc BOWSTRING METHOD DETENTION BASIN DESIGN Time Increment (min) 5 Time of Conc. (min) 5.00 Outflow (as) 1 Design Year Flow 10 Area (acres) . 1.07 Impervious Area (sq ft) 27960 C' Factor 0.6 208' Volume Provided 1180 Area' C 0.642 Time Time Inc. Intens. 0 Devel. (min) (sec) (in/hr) (cfs) CI 5.00 =__= 300 3.18 2.04 5 10 15 . 20 25 . 30 35 40 . 45 :.SO .55 60 65 70 75 60 85 90 95 100 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 3000 3300 3600 3900 4200 4500 4800 5100' 5400 5700 6000 3.18 2.24 1.77 1.45 1 1.04 0.91 0.82 0.74 0.68 0.64 0.61 0.60 0.58 0.56 0.53 0.52 0.50 0.49 0.48 2.04 1.44 1.14 0.93 0.78 0.67 0.58 0.53 0.48 0.44 0.41 0.39 0.39 0.37 0.36 0.34 0.33 0.32 0.31 0.31 PROJECT: Rlverwalk First Addition BASIN: A DESIGNER: M.H. DATE: 06/07/95 f12001 olgiUIN - DeA r 14116 KEPO '(V Vol.ln Vol.Out Storage (cu ft) (cu ft) (cu ft) = == 821 300 = 521 <__ 821 1010 1139 1212 1244 1270 1286 1317 1331 1354 1398 1450 1542 1602 1655 1668 1737 1766 1825 1880 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 3000 3300 3600 3900 4200 4500 4800 5100 5400 5700 6000 208' DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Required '208' Storage Volume = Impervious Area x . 5 h / 1 2 in/ft 1165 cu ft 208' Storage Volume Provided 1180 cu R DRYWELL REQUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN STOR Maximum Storage Required by Bowstring 521 cu ft Number and Type of Drywells Required 0 Single 1 Double 521 <__ 410 239 12 -256 -530 -814 -1083 -1369 -1646 -1902 -2150 -2358 -2598 -2845 -3132 -3363 -3634 -3875 -4120 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. In the process of checking and correcting the situations of North Idaho Engineering's design and construction of Riverwalk l Addition, we have become aware of a few pond situations where the grate inlet elevation in a pond is slightly higher than the Type 2 inlet elevation (back of inlet). However, the low point of the adjoining street is higher than the inlet. Therefore, although stromwater may pond up and start backing up into the ditch before it flows into the inlet, water will still enter the inlet before overflowing the road Although this is not our preferred scenario we feel that as long as the stormwater does not overflow the road the stormwater can enter the pond, percolate through the grass and enter the inlet without jeopardy to the public. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458.6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 - 765 -7784 • FAX: 208 - 769 -7277 May 8, 1997 Via Facsimile (one) Page Total May 6, 1997 W.O. No.96106 Dean- Housley Company 16720 NE 116th Street Redmond, WA 98052 Attn: Mark Hancock Re: Riverwalk, 1st Construction Dear Mark: It has been brought to my attention that your contractor and Dean Deiley representatives are of the opinion that you will only be building the substandard items once and if they are not correct you are going to look to IPEC for compensation. If this is true, then we have worked our last hour on this project. As you know we build nothing, on top of that we are not even the engineers of record nor were we the inspectors of record. Our only intention in all of this is to allow you to get Indiana approved so that Riverwalk's 2nd, 3rd and 4th could get final platted. Ultimately, so we can be paid. I expect a letter from you absolving IPEC of any liabilities associated with the continued construction activities at Riverwalk 1st, with the one exception being the re- construction of the . cross -walk. We will assume some future liability for a problem with the reconstruction as long as we are properly notified by you or your designated representative with the exact construction schedule. We need two days advance notice as well. Sincerely, Inla /id Pacifi Todd R. Whipple, P.E. TRW /tw cc: file INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. neering Co., Inc. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509. 458 -6844 i re 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208 -769 -7277 May 5, 1997 I.P.E. W.O. #96106 Dean-Deily Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 ATTN: Mark Hancock RE: Riverwalk 1't Addition Dear Mark: We have sent you several letters, faxes, and plans stating and showing what needs to be done in Riverwalk lit to meet the minimum standards of Spokane County. We have been working with your contractor (K.C. Construction) and assisting them with pond corrections. At the request of K.C. Construction, we will be staking the proposed pond bottom areas of several ponds needing enlarging. After all the correspondence we have sent you, why do we continue to receive faxes from you asking what kind of work is required on Riverwalk 1't? We are tired of these innuendos that IPE is not working to complete this project. If these innuendos continue we will stop our participation in getting this project completed altogether. We are aware that you want this project completed and accepted, likewise so do we. As stated in previous letters, you are responsible for scheduling such as the grout inspection you have mentioned in a recent fax. Coordination is essential to complete this project. Please call Bruce Howard, our inspection engineer, and schedule someone to do this testing if you desire it. Please call us with any questions. Sincerely, _ Inlan fl Pacific Engineering, Inc. Todd R. Whipple, P.E. JDP /jdp IIE INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. cc: Ed Parry, Plan Review Engineer, Spokane County Public Works Ed Dean, Dean-Deily Company 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509 -458 -6844 1 '. \DOCUMLIRS196106`de11e417. W PD 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 - 765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 May 1, 1997 TO: Ed Parry & Todd Whipple FROM: Mark Hancock RE: Riverwalk Punchlist Progress An update on Riverwalk work, and request for help: I) KC Construction was working at the site today on the punchlist items, and they are already running out of things to do. 2) We need your help as follows: Ed - 1) Please review the questions in my memos last week, and let us know what you've been able to find out. 2) KC has told us that the pavers used for structure supports are not clay tiles but brick pavers, which Mike Klika says are approved for use in Spokane County and are used all over. Please confirm. Todd - 1) Verne and KC need direction regarding pond slopes. Since you've surveyed them, which ones do you require us to change, and how? (slope changes can impact volume) 2) Janelle visited the site today, and returned with additional questions from Verne and KC. Please review them with her ASAP and get the answers back to Verne. 3) Your intentions regarding "grout testing" are not clear to me. In the meeting at the County, I understood you to say that you were going to remove grout to inspect underneath for gaps and/or unapproved materials. In your 4/17 memo, it sounds like you simply are going to look for completed grouting. If your intentions are the former (looking underneath the grout), it would make more sense to do that "destructive" testing now - please advise. Thanks for your help, cc: Verne Jacobsen Ed Dean FAX MEMO Post -it' Fax Note 7671 Date4 / I AEA, ► I To tAtct. ik4A b± . From CoJDept _tc 1 L Co. Phone # Phoge� , —L4ifa Fa nNn Icte> [ 4e14 Fn//q (Sji' 'j - (eist't a+' INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Telephone - (509) 458 -6840 FAX - (509) 458 -6842 NOTES: vvvne, • DATE: VP.rine _ Jae)) � TO: - DP au1 - COMPANY: gal — ST/ L i • FAX NUMBER: z letvicl le_ Pic a FRfM! JOB NUMBER Fr; l Loses O MC- *lam ape rthm.a_ p ktnc ton-- +kc ' \1 s k_, r4o co1-t' on . y - Llit s \Fe_ u S a_ cArky. 0 o A CztAe, .. u1(terk 71-ea se t^ -� 'it-) FAX TRANSMISSION INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Telephone - (509) 458 -6840 FAX - (509) 458 -6844 • NOTES: Ver • FROM: 4 /z -+/47 • DATE: Vtvvte `a r.obi -A-. • TO: te.41 - t PA I � ( _h . • COMPANY: • FAX NUMBER: bt kl /e Bc • NUMBER OF PAGES: INCL. COVER PAGE 96/,06 JOB NUMBER Mark Navy mr ;Afar r wed nne i-kts a-Q ka rt oov. 4ko. - y'x,- 1 V ? w,ecAl'n Loi+14 Mike klurka `vnAnrvt6le.) winintitho 1° over ik�u, Tat flea , 4o be dnr e is R t*era tt k IS' fie. P T's arc_ inrnr ?lease- `{ `f-itcse. an. nx,r� 1 zil See j yenA a net, ("vie.- 44 as i±S apps I N \ (SW c ar rvir 2G caI p- LeR - -6 +I,.e c . a.. - This CaA1- th toe d,gtee, 4e4cCt IS 4n r, L o-edl +Le 4.1.4_ eye -4Le_ laa oM a4 p.s Cie . asa. sittack low o..S n. c. ' o - a 1 c..w. a. *Li emerct cD ?l tons,e cadl + ne_ u-) / alAy e FAX TRANSMISSION TO: ,t evy\ - 8720 N. G. 116 - .emov'd WA g ATTENTION: maYk -ilancock_ Description No. Copies Description Purpose cc: «VAX k Signed• c7avit '" e-e--- ti INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -6844 DATE: 4 /27_ /°Yl . I.P.E. PROJECT #• 9 G ( ?�W( PROJECT NAME. L4.1.A n � — fl Xerox Prints 0 Copy of Letter Original Drawing = Contract Documents 0 = Work Authorization C Report C Information O Review & Comments EJ Per Your Request C Written Approval 0 Signature & Return Remarks JZ S- l,,,/;,A a I; Ir� _ r Os -6. --0 0.g- 0. 67. . J2 ar .44 34A L - , °An ( .7 L/ -t �� t.rn�v�n1 ems, t csL_ . D D:\TRNSMP.PM5 NOTE: ORGANIC CARBON TESTING IS REQUIRED FOR THE TOPSOIL IF GUTTER FLOWLINE IS GREATER THAN 0.5' ABOVE SOD t TOP OF BERM ELEV.= TOP OF CURB ELEV. + .20 FT. DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN EASEMENT OR R.O.W. GUTTER FLOWLINE CURB DROP TYPE "B" CURB AND GUTTER MEW NORMAL GUTTER LINE 3:1 MP) IF TWO OR MORE CURB INLETS ARE USED, SET POND BOTTOM WITH RESPECT TO THE LOWEST CURB INLET GUTTER FLOWLINE ELEVATION SECTIONAL VIEW Ot,T TYPICAL "208" POND WITH DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE �� INLAND PACIFIC ENO 707 .w au . u. am t h>0 0 ) 40a -61.. _�, • 3 MAX. _I 1 1.5" SOD ON TOPSOIL, SOD INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE 1 " -3" TOPSOIL ON GRADED POND BOTTOM GRADED, POND BOTTOM .71' -.88' BELOW GUTTER FLOWLINE ;Y /.. / / ).. CONCRETE APRON 4" THICK P.C.C. NOTE: ORGANIC CARBON TESTING IS REQUIRED FOR THE TOPSOIL IF THE DRYWELL GRATE IS GREATER THAN 0.5' ABOVE SOD 1 I 1 TOP OF BERM ELEV.= TOP OF CURB ELEV. + .20 FT. DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN NOT TO SCALE pr INLAND � E N QINEERWD 707 WS M • v. 200 MO) WO sq*a,.. RA 92204 ma) 165-6544 3 MAX. Q 1 1.5" SOD ON TOPSOIL, SOD INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE GRATE ELEVATION NOTE: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. IF TWO OR MORE CURB INLETS ARE USED, SET POND BOTTOM WITH RESPECT TO THE LOWEST CURB INLET GUTTER FLOWLINE ELEVATION SECTIONAL VIEW 1 TYPICAL "208" POND WITH DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EASEMENT' OR R.O.W. GUTTER FLOWLINE CURB DROP NORMAL GUTTER LINE 3:1 (TYP) TYPE "B" CURB AND GUTTER 1 " -3" TOPSOIL ON GRADED POND BOTTOM GRADED POND BOTTOM 1.11' -1.28' BELOW EDGE OF ASPHALT /AY. CONCRETE APRON 4" THICK P.C.C. TOP OF BERM ELEV.= 'TOP OF CURB ELEV. + .20 FT. 1 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE INLAND rim � PACIFIC 707 Moot TI, • WI. 200 ( 1560 ) as-so !peln. WA 6Vtl 4 FM CIO) 466 -E644 NOTE: ORGANIC CARBON TESTING IS REQUIRED FOR THE TOPSOIL IF THE EDGE OF ASPHALT IS GREATER THAN 0.5' ABOVE SOD 3 MAX. 1 DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN 1.5" SOD ON TOPSOIL, SOD INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE GRATE ELEVATION MAX. NOTE: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. .4' MIN. • SECTIONAL VIEW TYPICAL "208" POND WITH DRAINAGE STRUCTURE 3:1 (TYP) 1 " -3" TOPSOIL ON GRADED POND BOTTOM GRADED POND BOTTOM 1.11' -1.28' BELOW EDGE OF 'ASPHALT EASEMENT OR R.O.W. EDGE OF ASPHALT NOT TO SCALE �— INLAND • � EN 707 Wed 2111 • 911. 200 (50) 9040 5p:Ism WA 09204 fAL CM) 4E5-0544 NOTE: ORGANIC CARBON TESTING IS REQUIRED FOR THE TOPSOIL IF THE EDGE OF ASPHALT IS GREATER THAN 0.5' ABOVE SOD EASEMENT OR R.O.W. 1 1 1 1 1 TOP OF BERM ELEV. = 1 S TOP OF CURB ELEV. + .20 FT. 1 1.5" SOD ON TOPSOIL, SOD EDGE CONCURRENT WITH ` EGE OF ASPHALT OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE \ 3 MAX. . Q 1 DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN di, 1.11' -1.28' 1 " -3" TOPSOIL ON GRADED POND BOTTOM GRADED POND BOTTOM .71' -.88' BELOW SECTIONAL VIEW EDGE OF ASPHALT o TYPICAL "208" POND WITH' DRAINAGE STRUCTURE March 31, 1997 W.O. 96983 `1610/0 Spokane County Engineers Engineering Development Services 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 Attn: Ed Parry Jr., P.E. Re: Riverwalk (PE -1414- 81/95) Riverwalk 6tlii exhibit drawing I5t Dear Ed: Enclosed please find an exhibit drawing of Lot 13, Block 1 of Riverwalk Is' Addition, showing the power transformer location. Sincerely, INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY Susan Murphy, E.I.T. sm enc. cc: file l: I Documenr1960831 exhib INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 i re 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 - 765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769.7277 ACQllI arm N AREA) /� • SIDEWALK, SLOPE DRAINAGE UT €LITY ESIu1T.) (OLD RIGHT OF WAY) c■ (SOUTH SIDE OF EXIST. HOUSE) (FACE OF CURB (TO FENCE) (NEW RIGHT OF WAY) MISSION AVENUE 5' 14' z 0 Q NSTALL WHEELCHAIR RAMP RIVERWALK 7TH ADDITION N 1 LOT 13, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1 ST ADDITION DATE: 3/26/97 J April 24, 1997 MEMORANDUM TO: Ed Parry ® Spokane County cc: Mike Klika Todd Whipple ® Inland Pacific Engineering Verne Jacobsen Ed Dean FROM: Mark Hancock ® Dean Deily RE: Riverwalk Completion Work - 1st, 2nd & 3rd Additions Verne Jacobsen and I met with Mike Klika at the Riverwalk site Tuesday, and we plan to begin and complete the corrective work at Riverwalk in the next week or so. In order to do so, we need your help with a number of questions, so here are the ones we have so far (in no particular order): 1) Todd - Have you completed the grout testing of structures that you planned to do? If not, how soon will it be done? (& are there any other testing/ inspections planned of existing work, or are the lists we now have the last ones other than the work we're about to do?) . 2) Todd & Ed - Why is pond P in the 1st Addition park required? (it doesn't seem needed, and we'd rather not do it) 3) Ed - What did Inland Asphalt propose to Bill Johns regarding the Indiana credit? (your notes with the 8th Addition letter said "no action" was needed ?) 4) Todd - Have you ALL pond surveys and revision drawings, and do we now have all your current material to complete the job? (including ponds G, H, I, & M ?) 5) Note: The Mission sidewalk relocation will now proceed since the power is out of the way, using most recent IPE drawings (Winkler will do, w /new permit). 6) Todd - Where are you and Winkler regarding the cross gutter status? Have you double checked pond talc's to make sure it is really needed? (note to Mike/Verne - get permit this time, & notify Ed Parry & IPE before work so they can attend the pour. Also, Ed Parry suggested Fibermesh additive in concrete to avoid cracking that has already happened in new one) 7) Todd - Does Ed Parry now have ail inspection and test reports and talc's fbr 1st /2nd/3rd Additions? (e.g. no paperwork IeR to do or hand over?) If not, what's left other than inspecting and certifying the work we're about to do? Riverwalk questions, 4/24/97, page 2 8) Ed - 111 send you a separate letter regarding completion of the pond landscape and irrigation per our discussions. 9) Ed - I met last week with Allen of Artistic Landscape and showed him the as -built information we needed - he was going to contact you to make sure he understood the requirements before he did the drawings. 10) Note: We_ are doing all corrective work (public & private) under original permits where original contractors are used (new contractors need new permits) 11) Note: While completing the public Indiana work is our first priority, we will also be completing the work in 1st Addition private areas, and then the balance of any work remaining in 2nd and 3rd Additions as well. We will have all work done in the next week or two, so IPE can certify and Ed Parry can accept before Ed leaves for first two weeks of June (while Ed is gone, then, the County inspectors would be able to go out and do their inspections in early June, so KC can do whatever else is necessary to finish the work in late June before the plans expire on July 5). 12) Ed - Have you been able to check with the drywell cleaning people about their ability to do maintenance on drywells that are: I) certain distances from the street, and 2) where lids/cones may be offset a little to accommodate surface conditions? 13) Todd - I am uncomfortable with your comment to Ed in your letter of 3/28, item 9,b). Without easements shown on detail sheets, we must assume that your pond revisions on all detail sheets fit within existing easements unless you show /tell us otherwise. Are you aware of any conflicts where ponds are being expanded outside of existing easements? Thanks a lot for your help. RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION PONDS CORRECTIONS LIST, 4124197 draft p Page 1 IPEC LISTS POND PB /PV 216 31284/17 # REQUIREMENTS ACTION /NOTES PUB X X X A Drywell to be 6" above pond bottom (see especially 4117 IPE list) Regrade sloped 3:1 along sidewalk, 6" berms in floor, replace rocks with sod PUB B Ed Parry - staggered cone OK? PUB C Reset grate to align with box below n/a DIE None ;(were temp. ponds at end of Indiana 1st) PUB X X X F This one is messy - see IPE 4/17 letter (the 2/6 and 3/28 lists are wrong) Pry X X G Enlarge pond (including new wall) and reset drywell rim per 3/28 list and drawing Pry X X 11 CB rim raise to 6" above pond bottom, solid lid on drywell, add Type 2 sidwalk inlet (see 3/28 list) Pry X I (3) Redo these three ponds per 3/28 list and dwg (easements and /or utilities might be issue) Pry J Need IPE direction on design Page 1 Pry K RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION PONDS CORRECTIONS LIST, 4/24/97 draft Page 2 PUB? X L Drywell is .66 above pond bottom Ask IPEJEd Parry if OK as is Sod and irrigate pond (pond bottom work may correct as well) PUB X M This one is messy - see IPE 4/17 letter and drawing PUB X X I N Add type 2 inlet in sidewalk, lower pond bottom and grate, raise McMillan grate & solid cover (use 3/28 IPE letter and dwg) Pry X X 0 Rework pond, CB & drywell per 3/28 list & dwg Castewood involved in this one Pry X X P Pond w/drywetl not built in the park IPEJEd Parry - why is this pond required? Page 2 TO: beam - i CAb- 6 N• C. 11b - eckynovlot r WW CKDOS2 ATTENTION: Kay \c,Y +inncocl. Description n Xerox Prints Original Drawing in Work Authorization No. Copies Purpose Information Written Approval Remarks 11 y k- cc: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -6844 4 I S Lid_ 1 ttAA kw s I 1Ittez7( 41.ze_ , / c-) D•S- O. 7 'tai weta. ate, 0. 6 ?.' Description Signed• QI1Zsa— 4 n Copy of Letter n Contract Documents ED Report (e rn Review & Comments El Signature & Return DATE: 4 /22- /ct I.P.E. PROJECT #• 9 i /( PROJECT NAME. :).5 ^•°/t AA r U 2134.4. OAT) Per Your Request hze:4 ALP /4-7 r4-L4 D, \TRNSMT.PM5 NOT TO SCALE NOTE: ORGANIC CARBON TESTING IS REQUIRED FOR THE TOPSOIL IF GUTTER FLOWLINE IS GREATER THAN 0.5' ABOVE SOD TOP OF BERM ELEV.= I TOP OF CURB ELEV. + .20 FT. DRAINAGE' EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN I INLAND Item. � PACIFIC ENGINEERING was, . R 2 2 0 4 202 (CO) 6 ° ( 606 406 -6644 ,, • SA* nx 3 MAX. 1 1.5" 'SOD ON TOPSOIL, 50D INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH • OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE IF TWO OR MORE CURB INLETS ARE USED, SET POND BOTTOM WITH RESPECT TO THE LOWEST CURB INLET GUTTER FLOWLINE ELEVATION EASEMENT OR R.O.W. SECTIONAL VIEW TYPICAL "208" POND WITH DRAINAGE STRUCTURE GUTTER FLOWLINE CURB DROP TYPE "B" CURB AND GUTTER NORMAL GUTTER LINE 3:1 (TYP) - . / /.. / / »' CONCRETE APRON 4" THICK P.C.C. 1 " -S' TOPSOIL ON GRADED POND BOTTOM GRADED POND BOTTOM .71' -.88' BELOW GUTTER FLOWLINE NOT TO SCALE ■ INLAND I � PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 Wmt Tn • Sub 250 WO) 466 -!GM Spae>., M cua. IAA (roe) 001-E144 NOTE: ORGANIC CARBON TESTING IS REQUIRED FOR THE TOPSOIL IF THE DRYWELL GRATE I5 GREATER THAN 0.5' ABOVE SOD t TOP OF BERM ELEV.= ' TOP OF CURB ELEV. + .20 FT. 3 MAX. Q 1 DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN 1.5" SOD ON TOPSOIL, SOD INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE GRATE ELEVATION 3 :1 MAX, EASEMENT OR R.O.W. NOTE: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL' AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. X IF TWO OR MORE CURB INLETS ARE USED, SET POND BOTTOM WITH RESPECT TO THE LOWEST CURB INLET GUTTER FLOWLINE ELEVATION SECTIONAL VIEW TYPICAL "208" POND WITH DRAINAGE STRUCTURE GUTTER FLOWLINE CURB DROP NORMAL GUTTER LINE TYPE "B" CURB AND GUTTER 1 " -3" TOPSOIL ON GRADED POND BOTTOM GRADED POND BOTTOM 1.11' -1.28' BELOW EDGE OF ASPHALT CONCRETE APRON 4" THICK P.C.C. 1 NOT TO SCALE r- INLAND I C PACIFIC 707 West 7V, • an. 100 (000) 410 -0740 224421. WA 00]01{ not (1001) 401 -0844 TOP OF BERM ELEV.= TOP OF CURB ELEV. + .20 FT. 1 NOTE: ORGANIC CARBON TESTING IF THE EDGE OF ASPHALT 3 MAX. Q 1 DRAINAGE I EASEMENT 1.5" SOD ON TOPSOIL, SOD INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE GRATE ELEVATION 3:1 MAX. IS REQUIRED FOR THE TOPSOIL IS GREATER THAN 0.5' ABOVE SOD AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN NOTE: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. SECTIONAL VIEW TYPICAL "208" POND WITH DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EASEMENT OR R.O.W. EDGE OF ASPHALT 1 " -3" TOPSOIL ON GRADED POND BOTTOM GRADED POND BOTTOM 1.11' -1.28' BELOW EDGE OF ASPHALT NOT TO SCALE INLAND • rim' � ENGINEERING 707 w- 7th • WY 100 (OW) 4a8 -a40 **a WA 94204 rim (ew) ,es -eau NOTE: ORGANIC CARBON TESTING IS REQUIRED FOR THE TOPSOIL IF THE EDGE OF ASPHALT IS GREATER THAN 0.5' ABOVE SOD 3 MAX. Q 1 DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN TOP OF BERM ELEV. =• TOP OF CURB ELEV. + .20 FT. 1.5" SOD ON TOPSOIL, SOD INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE 1 .11' -1.28' SECTIONAL VIEW TYPICAL "208" POND WITH' ° DRAINAGE STRUCTURE 1 " -3" TOPSOIL ON GRADED POND BOTTOM GRADED POND BOTTOM .71' —.85' BELOW EDGE OF ASPHALT EASEMENT OR R.O.W. 11 EDGE OF ASPHALT INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Telephone - (509) 458 -6840 FAX - (509) 458 -6844 • NOTES: Mcwk. 4b0-A7 ▪ DATE: • TO: Mr�k JMeA n . Dec" .bp.ik 1 COMPANY: FAX NUMBER: I I • FROM: • NUMBER OF PAGES: JOB NUMBER INCL COVER PAGE w wP tbki 1( s town nAcywa lay WIMP at f--k. cm o M,[ sS I'ox -(-}cor Ait fry &t v1 #to-tA_ -HA( s.; o(e.r oA k. & Y z -1e r FAX TRANSMISSION 11 Telephone - (509) 458 -6840 FAX - (509) 458 -6844 NOTES: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 ■ • • • • • 4/11r /77 DATE: N k 14n VICAOCAL TO: b e-ay. - /. I Y t7 COMPANY: (QOC> -po FAX NUMBER: atne,l le 4 i FROM: INCL. COVER PAGE Rfo 1 669 NUMBER OF PAGES: JOB NUMBER 'g ti\eto pie -cie j e my Its-1- -fa add t 4-ke q-k1 y btit fz (rrod ImAre -Car izi;•rexatt . iesc. u vc ;frww.s me des elr SSed . D n (AA. r ,vte ' s I -1- 1 A 5 fraf4P l Aux�tl_ (Ed PaXry) FAX TRANSMISSION U April 17, 1997 I.P.E. W.O. #96106 Dean-Deily Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 ATTN: Mr. Mark Hancock RE: Construction Deficiency List Rivenvalk 1st Addition Dear Mark: in INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. This letter transmits a list of construction items for Riverwalk 1st that are currently in non- conformance with approved project plans and applicable Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. This letter is based on our meeting at the County with Ed Parry on April 16, 1997, and previous letters regarding Riverwalk 1s' construction.. This letter is an addendum to our previous letters and correspondence dated in March 1997; February 1997; October 1996, August 1996, July 1996, and June 1996 regarding deficiencies in Riverwalk 1st Addition construction. Check for the use of clay tiles on all drainage structures. Check the mortar on the outside of structures per meeting of last year after the utility construction went through. Those showing the use of clay -tiles must be removed and replaced; those structures lacking mortar both inside and out will need to also be removed and replaced. tar Pond F, located at the southwest corner of Harmony & Indiana, requires the removal and replacement of the non - standard structure and the damaged drywell cone. The ditch requires regrading to the Type 2 curb inlet. Pond A, located along the south side of Indiana beginning at Barker, requires regrading of the side - slopes to 3:1, grade side - slopes to top of sidewalk, there should be no edge of sidewalk reveal when done. Ensure that the berms in the pond are at least 6" off the pond bottom floor, no exceptions. The rocks at the Type 2 curb inlets need to be removed and replaced with sod. Pond M, located at the southeast corner of McMillan and Indiana, requires that the drywell rim be raised 0.2' above the edge of pavement elevation, and the grate be replaced with a solid lid. An inlet must be installed in the pond bottom with the grate 0.8' above the pond bottom, and a pipe installed from the catch basin to the drywell. This pipe will be required to negotiate the utilities beneath the pond bottom and may have to enter the drywell below the existing cap. See detail attached. 707 West 7111 • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 • 509.458 -6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208 -769 -7277 Riverwalk 1" Construction Deficiency April 17, 1997 Page 2 air Before the relocated Mission Sidewalk can be poured, a utility box needs to be relocated south of the curb return. This has already been coordinated for you with WWP. You should schedule the concrete work the week of 4/28/97. The homeowner has also been notified and you must coordinate the new sidewalk location with his irrigation system. As you know, your plans for Riverwalk 1" expire on July 5, seventy -nine days from today. These items must be corrected prior to that time, prior to finalization of project record drawings, and prior to calling for final inspection and acceptance of the construction by the County Engineer's office. We will assist you every way. However, you are required to schedule the work as well as notify us of the schedule for inspection. If we have adequate notification we can assist your contractor in completing these construction elements CORRECTLY! Please call with any questions. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. Todd R. Whipple, P.E. cc: Ed Parry, Plan Review Engineer, Spokane County Public Works I:V1000MF.VTC\96106We11nal7 WPU INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. RECORD OF CONVERSATION �1uG� Project If Name: iliu/d/t 1C.__. in Phone al Meeting Person Calling/Called: Meeting at Phone No.: Attendees: Subject: gip re,/ D raw / k5 • T[/d.u6-1q c 111 f f 'ten 2° RPcl t e- Aft re d (tzy7il O 74 - {' Lrv� /e- P.- . 2. Oct r• JUL At 2 1.4- / I n7 in h fir, "7/f J /) Date: z71 " ( 6 ` V Page / of .) es" " ,S C ef{ /�,r �IC eGtt:+ ���' °t — lac ✓1i Gvr?e-f l! cu/ /-ie,c,. L ath c.../ se to,/ 4 6". Is: y n 'e'w N — 7 87,--e-1-1444.1 Attested By: / µ`� INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. RECORD OF CONVERSATION Project # Name: n Phone 0 Meeting Person Calling/Called: Meeting at Phone No.: Attendees: Subject: 3 . M4' r rer veo v,? cane 3' Yef&ee r Yale. 7, (24 - ,4/ dvc d4'i 37� Y�eS GLte—at Attested By ti Pei: etc 2 ok -X le.7 (-,--- €1 ° /.1°74 om` � - c/W u77 4 n f . 4c4/__ izettio i 9� Pert /7AWA le 745 4 /o' 6 5TNewa -lk Z/ / fa � ' cGrc,L w - r /6c /C0 S' i2i vrsi` vae-wcyttc. Coe cto p ot 7 9r — March 28, 1997 W.O.96106 Ed Parry, P.E. Spokane County Engineers 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 RE: P1414 Riverwalk P.U.D. 1' Addition Dear Ed; 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509 -458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458.6844 I rr INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. As you know we have been continuously gathering information on the roads and drainage facilities of Riverwalk 1't. At this time we are submitting the record drawing information for the public and private streets of Riverwalk 1't. We believe that all public facilities in Riverwalk 1't are ready to be accepted by Spokane County except for the following: 1) The cross -gutter on Indiana across McMillan needs to be reconstructed as redesigned by Inland Pacific Engineering. 2) The sidewalk on Mission Avenue needs to be removed and reconstructed as redesigned by Inland Pacific Engineering and accepted by Spokane County. We had previously sent you a record drawing submittal of Riverwalk 1't for the acceptance of Indiana Avenue, and on December 9, 1996, you responded with a letter with your review comments on the 1't submittal. At that time we had only provided you with the Indiana Avenue and had omitted the Mission Avenue and Private Road information. Although, the private road information and construction of drainage ponds and ditches is not complete we are returning the entire record drawing set to you for review. At this time, we are proposing that the County hold the record drawings done to date and as items noted on the attached letter become complete we will check them out and modify them. We feel that this will be the easiest way for the County to have control of the mylars and be informed as to the status of the construction items. Below, we have attempted to address your comments in the same order you commented, your comments are noted in italics with the respond in bold. General 1. Pond bottom dimensions have been added to the pond details on the supplemental sheet. Sheet 2 : Indian Avenue 1. Callouts to the supplemental sheets should be provided for those items shown as deleted Noted. 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 - 765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 Spokane County March 28, 1997 Page 2 2. Why were the pedestrian curb ramps not installed? These items are required. These were initially not installed due to the Barker Road widening project being submitted the week of January 20th, 1997. The curb ramps should be deleted from the Riverwalk 1st plan set as they will be installed with the Barker Road improvement project being constructed by Pacific Properties as a part of Riverwalk 7th. 3. Pond A a) Calculations are needed to show the pipe is adequate- - - Hydraulic calculations are included to show that the pipe is adequate. b) Drywell grate is more than 0.5; above the swale floor (23.52). This swale floor elevation is not correct. However, the drywell grate should actually be raised to elev. 2024.94 (pond bottom approximately = 2024.44). Please see attached letter. c) "End Pond" station is deleted. "End Pond" station has been added to the supplemental sheet. 4. Pond Fj a) Drywell under sidewalk A solid locking cover over the drywell needs to be installed at the sidewalk elevation so that the drywell can be cleaned. The grate over the inlet in the ditch needs to be replaced with a solid cover. At this time the drywell has been raised, and the contractor is waiting for the weather to warm up in order to pour the new sidewalk section around the rim. b) Catch basin rim only provides 0.35' depth. The catch basin rim should be raised from elevation 2027.70 to elevation 2027.85 (pond bottom approximately= 2027.35) c) Need pipe calculations. Hydraulic calculations are no longer needed. After the revisions, the only functioning pipe is from the inlet within the pond to the drywell. 5. Was a plan change /design deviation processed to delete the curb returns for the extension of Harmony Lane north of Indiana? Todd Whipple's fax (dated 21 July 95) indicates that North Idaho Engineers would be responsible for revising the project mylars on file at the County. The County has not received a plan change request for this item to date. This item was changed per the revised preliminary plat when the overall preliminary plat was revised in May, 1995 with the preliminary plat of record. We believe that no plan change is required due to the status of the record drawings showing that it has been removed and that it is not consistent with either the preliminary plat of record or the filed and recorded final plat for Riverwalk 1st Addition. Spokane County March 28, 1997 Page 3 6. Was the sidewalk constructed through the deleted entry of Harmony Lane north of Indiana? The sidewalk is drawn as constructed on the mylar and is shown on the supplemental sheet. We will call out see supplemental sheet on the mylar. 7.MCR elevation indicated at the west quadrant of Harmony /Indiana causes a sump condition at the curb ramp. The survey shots are taken at the actual TOC at the ramp location. Therefore, the flow elevations around the ramp are 28.59, 28.46, and 28.27; therefore, no ponding of water takes place and continuous flow exists around the intersection. This has been clarified on the drawings. &Pond B a) Rim elevation on mylar needs to be coordinated with supplemental sheet. The drywell rim elevation (2028.62) on the supplemental sheet has been corrected to coordinate with the elevation on the original mylar. b) Drywell is more than 8' from the curb line. Although the offset is more than 8' from the curb, County Maintenance can maintain this drywell. 9. Pond C a) Rim provides 0.65' depth over floor elevation. Organic carbon testing is required. The drywell rim elevation in Pond C is at 2027.78 and the pond floor elevation has an approximate elevation of 2027.21. Organic Carbon Testing has been performed. The soil contains 4.48% organic matter and a 20.7 cation exchange capacity, passing the minimum requirements. b) Easement dimensions needs to be shown on the revised detail. This pond has not had easement revisions and consequently the easement should not need to be dimensioned on the detail page. The easement dimensions for all ponds can be obtained from the plat. 10. Pond M a) Were the floor and rim elevations constructed in accordance with the accepted plans? This pond was not constructed in accordance with the accepted plans due to a number of circumstances. The configuration shown on the Supplemental sheet has been dimensioned and is correct. Organic Carbon Testing has been performed. The soil contains 4.93% organic matter and a 22.9 cation exchange capacity, passing the minimum requirements. Spokane County March 28, 1997 Page 4 b) Details of the Keystone block wall were not received. A plan change was not processed. Keystone walls less than 4' do not require details and can be installed under manufacturers recommendations. Please note that the dimensions on the wall enclosed does not exceed 2.69' in height. This wall was constructed by a landscaper during pond reconfiguration. IPEC did not request construction of the wall and assumes no liability regarding its design and construction and must fall back on the manufacturer recommendations. The only thing we are prepared to do is obtain certification from the landscaper that the wall was built per manufacturer's recommendations. 11. Pond N This is a private facility and was designed to only collect stormwater from McMillan Lane. This pond requires some correction as described in the attached letter. 12. Was the concrete cross - gutter ever installed? The cross - gutter has been installed but failed the flow test. It needs to be removed and reconstructed as designed by Inland Pacific Engineering. 13. The MCR at Indiana & McMillan indicates a break line would cause runofffrom McMillan to flow south and into Pond N. Pond N is a private facility designed to only collect stormwater from McMillan Lane as designed. Stormwater from Indiana Avenue should flow through the cross - gutter and to a pond on Indiana within Riverwalk 2nd. 14. Sprinkler Systems on Indiana Dean Housley has been reminded that the sprinkler systems must-be installed. 15. Pond D and Pond E are located in Rivenvalk 2n and identified as Pond "A" and Pond "C" respectively. These.require sodding and irrigation prior to acceptance. The drywells in these ponds will not be accepted as part of Riverwalk 1 ". Noted. Spokane County March 28, 1997 Page 5 There are a number items pertaining to private roads and drainage facilities that require attention. These items have been incorporated into a letter describing what needs to be done so that the private facilities of Riverwalk 1 g can be in conformance with the plans. A copy of the packet containing the letter and drawings is attached. Sine rely, Inladd Pacifi gineering, In odd R. Whipple, Q, E . TRW /trw /jdp Enc.- original mylars, record drawing mylars, two sets of prints, supporting soil testing information, misc. calculations cc: Mark Hancock, Dean I-Iousley Company file SOIL CHEMICAL ANALYSES DEPTH FOOT MOISTURE NITROGEN - Slur lur S ppm Organic Mane( Phosphorous P wm Palassldm I( Ppn Callum Ca Magnosluv Mg Sodium Na Total Bases C EXtange r+.'riF Percent Base Saturation Field tweet, aw.n. we." NO3 PPm NO3 NH4 lbs. Per bee Perron Ac. a e suwbon.w r,raw w e• men. per 100 rams I 4.48 20.7 0 2 3 4 S MINOR ELEMENT ANALYSIS DEPTH FOOT PH Sol abie Sass nattosvan BO= Bo B Zinc Zn Manganese Mn Copper Cu Iron Fe awesome with acid Parts Per Milton - ppm TOTAL 0.00 0 0 I 2 Estimated Nluogen Release Estimated Total Nitrogen ham Organic Manor: Available to Crop: Last Years Crept 3 Field No.: Foniisor: Common; and Recommendations: NORTHWEST fr 9055 2545 West Falls • Kennewick. WA 99336 (509) 783-7450 FAX (509) 783 -5305 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 W 7TH FIVE SUITE 200 SPOKANE, WA . Field Name: Pond C Crop Year. REPORT NO.: Grower: Sarrplor. Crap to be Grown: Dale Rodeved and/or Sarrpled: 2/19/97 6226 — Page 1 of 2 Pleb Goal: Northwest Agricultu al Con ultants, Inc. SOIL CHEMICAL ANALYSES DEPTH FOOT SOIL MOISTURE NITROGEN Suryur S ppm Organic Maher Peron Phosphorous P Pr n Potassium K Ken Calcium lum Ca Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na To Bases �'on Exchange Percent Base Salutation %.,/ — n•and •db "that" "fl N93 ppm N NH a eats.. a .-.t.t. /alai. 6'o.aon moo per 100 grand u,.m . Per Awe 1 4.93 22.9 0 2 3 4 5 MINOR ELEMENT ANALYSIS DEPTH FOOT PH Somabli mean Boron B Zinc Zn Manganese Mn Coppor Cu Iron Fe Ellervesence with acid 6 Pans Per Mon - rpm TOTAL 0.00 0 0 1 2 Estimated Nitrogen Release Estimated Total Nitrogen Nom Organic Manor: Available to Crop: Last Vow's Crcp: 3 A Field No.: Fertilizer: Comments and Recommendation: NORTHWEST r t tatai 6on 2545 West Falls • Kennewick, WA 99336 (509) 783-7450 FAX (509) 783 -5305 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 W 7TH AVE SUITE 200 SPOKANE, WA Hold N ame: Pond N Crop Year: 9055 Date Roaovod and/or Sampled: REPORT NO.: 6226 — Page 2 of 2 Grower: Sanger: Crop to be Grown: Nort Yield Goat west Agricultural Cons lants, Inc. 2/19/97 1,0 = 1.02 c- Ogo = 1,2?) Ss 2000 - 1000 - 800 -600 - t-00 - 400 300 - - 200 N - U ▪ — Z N - 100 Z w — �o - • o - o 0' — 60 ¢ —50 . - 30 -8 6 -5 — 4 • 0 —120 108 12 NVNLAV• 0 poeaC 90SO5 JAN. 1563 N N. 1 •• ,{ Slap: 5, SUS•. RCM OOTLCT CDLVLRT fL0WlN4 FULL N V • I • 6 e -L50 rot avlln clo-e nal wen•.o•a, camtpvis Nv by Tome4. encnb•o + 14 4 moc•as• E* � L�bO .00 • •D0 0% .5 0 • •aj Ekq _2025,79 h ?c_ Ihvt = zoL4 . 04 6 -50 /•75 — , 80 Figure 20 Sheet 1 of 2 10 2 IO 20 75 HEAD FOR CONCRETE PIPE GULVERTS FLOWING FULL n =0.012 March 28, 1997 W.O. 96106 Spokane County Engineers 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 -0710 Attn: Ed J. Parry, Jr., P.E. Re: Rivenvalk P.U.D. 1" Addition Dear Ed, 1. Cross Gutter at Indiana and McMillan IIs INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. This letter accompanies the Record Drawings for Riverwalk 1" Addition as well as a letter outlining or responding to your comments on your last review. The intent of this letter is to provide you with a listing of those remaining construction items which we believe will allow the County to perform your acceptance inspections. At this time there remains a number of items needing attention within this project. Although there are deficient items remaining, IPEC is proposing to submit the Record Drawings to Spokane County and update them as the remaining public and private related deficient construction items are reconstructed, constructed and corrected. We feel that it is in the County's best interest to accept the record drawing submittal and allow this process to continue. Below is a list of the items needing attention that were obvious to IPEC during our last walk through on March 27, 1997, within Riverwalk 1" Addition. I've separated the list between the public roads and facilities needing attention and the private roads and facilities. In general, the public road and private roadway construction portion of this project is essentially complete. Those items remaining to be constructed, reconstructed or corrected generally relate to the storm drainage ponds, inlets, pipes and structures. At the present time the only minor item relating to the public roads is that they need to be swept to remove the winter and debris and gravel that has accumulated. Following are the items pertaining to public roads or facilities. As you know this gutter as poured was under some scrutiny due to lack of current building permit and possible improper additive. Additionally, the configuration of the cross gutter did not match the new design prepared by IPEC as the original design approved by the County and designed by North Idaho Engineers would not work as designed. As a final inspection and verification procedure IPEC performed a flow test on March 14, 1997 to insure that the intent of Spokane County March 28, 1997 Page 2 the cross gutter design would convey flow to match the storm water design report. The test included opening the fire hydrant upstream to replicate an approximate flow of 0.5 cfs to 1.0 cfs to insure that the gutter would operate as designed. As constructed the cross gutter did not pass the flow test and therefore needs to be removed and reconstructed as designed. The testing revealed that the cross - gutter across McMillan was not constructed with the proper flow paths as runoff is not totally contained within cross -gutter to flow along Indiana Avenue as designed. In some areas on the gutter, some runoff leaves the cross -gutter and flows towards the two ponds on either side of McMillan Lane intended to only hold water from the private streets. 2. Pond A, Indiana Avenue The drywell grate needs to be raised to be 0.5' above pond bottom, (proposed grate elev. 2024.94, pond bottom approximately= 2024.44). 3. Pond F, southwest corner of Harmony and Indiana A solid locking cover over the drywell needs to be installed at the sidewalk elevation so that the drywell can be cleaned. The grate over the inlet in the ditch needs to be replaced with a solid cover. At this time the drywell has been raised, and the contractor is waiting for the weather warm up in order to pour the new sidewalk section around the rim. Within the pond the catch basin rim should be raised from elevation 2027.70 to elevation 2027.85 (pond bottom approximately= 2027.35) The following pertain to private roads or facilities. 4. Pond N, southeast corner of McMillan and Indiana This pond was designed to collect stormwater from McMillan Avenue only. It was constructed without an inlet to allow stormwater into the pond with the swale directly discharging into the drywell. A portion of the sidewalk needs to be removed, a Type 2 curb inlet installed, and the ditch regraded through the inlet to the pond. In addition, the grate within the pond needs to be lowered 0.3' to ensure that no ponding in the street occurs. The lowering of the grate requires that the pond bottom also be lowered by 0.5'. The grate inlet along McMillan lane needs to be raised and replaced with a solid cover. A plan for these corrections is attached. 5. Pond L The drywell rim is 0.66' above the graded pond bottom, and still requires sodding and irrigation. 6. Pond G, northeast corner of Harmony and Baldwin This pond was constructed too small, and the drywell rim is less than 0.5' above the pond floor. Reconstructing the pond bottom at elevation 2027.27 will ensure proper `208' treatment. Enclosed is the surveyed as- constructed pond size with a copy of the approved pond plan. Please Spokane County March 28, 1997 Page 3 note that the approved pond plan is approximately 2X the size required for `208' treatment. A plan is attached showing a retaining wall for this pond, to enlarge it enough to provide the required volume. 7. Pond H, southeast corner of Harmony and Baldwin The catch basin needs to be raised so that it is 0.5' above the pond bottom. The drywell grate in the ditch needs to be replaced with a solid lid as called out on the plans. There is no sidewalk inlet; therefore, a section of sidewalk needs to be removed and a type 2 curb inlet installed so stormwater can enter the pond. The swale /ditch will then need to be regraded to the inlet. 8. Pond I(s), Harmony Lane These three ponds are not large enough to provide the required volume for `208' treatment. Combined, these three ponds along Harmony Lane need to provide a minimum of 929 cubic feet. Together, they are only providing 720 cubic feet. A plan to correct this is attached. 9. Pond 0, southwest corner of McMillan and Baldwin The drywell is located under the sidewalk and needs to be raised to the sidewalk elevation and a solid lid put on it. The pond needs to be enlarged, and the bottom graded flat. The grate in the street needs to be replace with a solid lid, and the ditch graded to the curb inlet. This pond still requires sodding and irrigation. Enclosed is the surveyed as constructed pond size, a proposed plan, and a copy of the approved pond. 10. Pond P, common area Pond P has not yet been constructed. Enclosed is a copy of the approved plan. Spokane County March 28, 1997 Page 4 Even with the minor deficiencies noted we are recommending that County reduce the bond on Indiana to a modest 10- percent which would still be adequate in the event that the drainage items are not constructed. At this point the street section of Indiana should be ready to accept even with the minor drainage items left to accomplish and we feel that we are ready for a final walk through and punch list compilation with yourself or other County representatives. Should you have any questions regarding this information please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Inl Pacific gineering Todd R. Whipple, P.E. TRW /trw /jdg enclosures - deficiency work order drawings for each pond cc: Mark Hancock, Dean Housely file art/ 11/01 LV.%V Pit.% LVU 00V WIC To: Company: Phone: Fax: Facsimile Cover Sheet From: Mark Hancock DEAN -DEILY COMPANY 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, WA 98052 Phone: (206) 8694618 Fax: (206) 869 -6620 ierPOb Date: � r 9 (Spy -T Pages including this cover page: ` The information contained 1R this farabts&e consitomicotion It privileged and/or coglidendal information Intended only for the ate of the individual or entity named abort Lithe reader of this cover page & nog the hnended vulpine, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this comnsmicatton or the information contained In this communication is strfcgly prohibited If you have received this communication In error, please immediately notify as by tetephorta Thoth you. Comments: ucnri 1/r.1L1 'u. Extension: 234 3-01N EP7h1 'Qmc FDtz ft Wit -tint-e_ PRoarci Theenns Cc s Odic_ odv l fe° 4 006 S !CO Pni - TYmucs 1 w_J UV April 1, 1997 W.O. 96106 Spokane County Engineers 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 -0710 Attn: Ed J. Parry, Jr., P.E. Re: River walk P.U.D. 1" Addition Dear Ed, INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. This letter is an addendum to the letter dated March 28,1997 which accompanied the Record Drawings for Riverwalk 1" Addition. The intent of the original letter was to provide you with a listing of those remaining construction items which we believe would allow the County to perform its acceptance inspections. The list had been divided into public and private items describing matters that still required some work. In our letter we realized that we did not include that the sidewalk on Mission Avenue needs to be removed and reconstructed as redesigned by Inland Pacific Engineering and accepted by Spokane County. This is a public facility and requires correcting before Riverwalk 1°` can be accepted by Spokane County. One other item that was brought to our attention is that Pond C on the southeast comer of Harmony & Indiana requires sodding on the east end of the pond. Sincerely Inland Pacific E,gineering Todd R. Whipple, P.E. TRW /jp cc: Mark Hancock, Dean Housley Company 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509 -458 -6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 ire 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 . 208. 765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. RECORD OF CONVERSATION P r o j e c t # hb i °m Name:. R• W s t • I — Date: I ' 7 - 6 • 1 1 0 Phone © Meeting Page ' of Person Calling/Called: Meeting at 0° ' 1 °' Phone No.: Attendees: Subject: I . 6e4-04 a..tsl a t. 44A-w.. 1 t-+k -- a,ti 4Mn 2. Seek t ck b-i } en"- IM,i sA bw SIMGV.,a1tc. 5 tko...ri v�.- u-i-4 t 9 3 • Sev„ 1 with plight.- re r ,04 -3 t o, , J , IAA L Ltiw w�. 4' P1xAc - os...I C - vteoln 'Soot au c eArel o T Pov4.l. S. Sta.? 2 a,..•t 2 ; $ 1.-.41 vteac+ wto).- Attested By Elm) PoaeWs, , VN• 1 r- 1a,i,.,e P. (.irtrt elm L. 3 • Roe. i n , t- 4owawi March 26, 1997 W.O. 96106 Mark Hancock c/o Dean Housley Company 16720 N.E. 116t St. Redmond, WA 98052 RE: Riverwalk Cross Gutter, Indiana and McMillan Dear Mark: On Friday, March 14, 1997, John McKervey and I did a flow test on the cross -gutter along Indiana Avenue where it crosses McMillan Lane. The cross - gutter did not pass the flow test. As water ran along Indiana, and entered the cross -gutter water began to flow across McMillan Lane; however, the water would not stay fully contained within the cross - gutter. Some water flowed out (southward) about the center of the cross - gutter and then would flow towards the pond on the southwest corner of the intersection (Pond M). Some water did make it through the cross -gutter to the other side of McMillan lane, but then would flow into the pond located at the southeast corner of the intersection (Pond N). See attached diagram for flow analysis, overall, approximately 30% of the flow reached its destination. As designed, the flow was intended to cross McMillan Lane completely and flow to Pond C in Riverwalk 2 "d Addition. The cross - gutter will need to be replaced prior to approval to and by Spokane County. Please call Inc at (509) 458 -6840 with any questions. Sincerely, _ - - Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. Janelle Poe, E.I.T. JDP /Jp cc: Ed Parry, Spokane County irr INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. 707 West 7111 • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509. 458.6844 • 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208 -769 -7277 Post -it• Fax Note 7671 Date -7)/ Ipayes i From Co. /Depthmm 47)Li LE1 Co. E. c— or Colo I � �� \ t o Phone 1 p �cp / / 458 —/n 840 W N Fax #(5 pi 455_60g CROSS - GUTTER FLOW PATHS 22 +80 53 MCMILLAN LANE ../ 0 / X W / • i2 \• \. -D C, o w r 1=AXE" V L 0 f INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Telephone - (509) 458 -6840 FAX - (509) 458 -6844 • NOTES: 2/, /97 • DATE: VP e_ • TO: ) .l1FAAA_ i LtAJP, ▪ COMPANY: 92/ 5 El FAX NUMBE VCkl/LP 911, 1 C • FROM: • NUMBER OF PAGES: INCL. COVER PAGE �,/%ew) "fr3 c h•-k -t 0 7 t jiktI / fr Lit C •- *^ -"/�� ( M/ f /-2f /2 4 4 1 .t- 96 tO6 JOB NUMBER ykal yi/h / /'C/u /n Pi JAt FAX TRANSMISSION NOTE: IF THE EXISTING INLET WITHIN THE POND HAS RISERS THAT CAN BE REMOVED, NOTHING NEEDS TO BE DONE WITH THE PIPES. HOWEVER, IF THE WHOLE INLET REQUIRES LOWERING, THE PIPE WILL NEED TO BE TORN UP AND REINSERTED MAINTAINING A 2% SLOPE. CROSS- GUTTER SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD -' TYPE A DRYWELL WITH SOLID LID. GRATE ELEV.= 2027.86 RAISE CATCH BASIN RIM 0.3' AND REPLACE GRATE WITH SOUD COVER. UD ELEV= 2027.54 REGRADE DITCH THROUGH INLET TO POND BOTTOM STREET NAME SIGN LAMP POST TYPE B CURB & GUTTER RIGHT OF WAY / .re, ii / i'17• . \ / / --- ° o, ) \ / i' i BREAK OUT SIDEWALK & INSERT TYPE 2 CURB INLET. 16 UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BACK OF SIDEWALK BASIN (POND) N BACK OF 6' SIDEWALK DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOWER GRATE OF TYPE 2 CONCRETE INLET 2 BY 0.3' EXISTING GRATE ELEV= 2027.11 PROPOSED GRATE ELEV= 2026.81 REQUIRED '208' POND VOLUME = 492 CU.FT. CONSTRUCTED '208' POND VOLUME = 497 CU.FT. rall INLAND PACIFIC � ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Sax. 200 (509) 458 -5840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX (509) 458 -5844 NEED TO LOWER CONSTRUCTED POND BOTTOM 0.5' BELOW INLET GRATE. PROPOSED PON BOTTOM ELEV= 2026.31 13' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT NEED TO MAINTAIN POND BOTTOM AREA. WILL REQUIRE KEYSTONE WALL TO STAY WITHIN EASEMENT. I r'"' 20f INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Telephone - (509) 458 -6840 FAX - (509) 458 -6844 • NOTES: k ick f A • • • 1 • • 0241 / 7 DATE: �/ Ah c frA//JGL T0: "M/ -- 014 S / COMPANY: 6 /-02eyn - /309 — &&2P FAX NUMBER: (nNCLL FROM: INCL. COVER PAGE 2 I llO���j NUMBER OF PAGES: JOB NUMBER T' ca 0/ti :i i , YP4r -t _ 1 A/J rn,k AAA/E._ ( 4zJ 42,„ FAX TRANSMISSION II 5111911 OT. 01 53011 • C L 53 1U:11 05 LI .31011 C5 O 53041 as 91 S3HJNI Of d 5310NI 05 51 S3HON1 CT 0 53011 0'G ♦ 1 53011 01 N S31011 9'9 C1 53HJ11I 01 ry 53H001 05 CI S391001 9 • 3 53H71I VG 11 53041 L'C 53910111 65 01 SitONt 0s C S3HJNI C'I 6 531041 LI 53110•1 00 9 5311019 VC H 93110141 05 L 53011 it 0 53100 0'G 9 5311981 rf 53H0111 0'5 G 531011 sr 3 5311JNI 0'S 0 S3143N1 CC 0 5301 CS C 53910911 IL J ("G) 3AY N009n L (Y5) 304 801550 9 CTS) N05(0 I (jr) 304 901091 Y 111•30 3800 H1d30 3a03 ONI803 31383NO3 5301195 9 53011 91 L 53143911 0C 9 53NJN19'1 5 53100 VG s 5311991 VC ()'C) '304 x06540 L (.v) '$Y Horan t H1d30 3x03 ON1803 1lHVdSV N011Y301 3803 31383NO3 3f1N3A8 NOISSIr( NO 38Y e V v 310N 'SNOIjV301 ONI803 3/183803 e 30N3AV NOISSI)N NO 32*WV 310N '5 /10110301 0NI803 11YHdSV 0N3031 /tS A8YON008 Peld �d M ‘5 ` L 310N 335 { , L1.141% mynas tuovi C a �7 7 �+ r�' L� S lOT LVGO 1 IJNIQOJ NOLLIGOV ,I,SI Q n d >IZVA&H2ARI 1 -rn WOO )ul . `urrnn ONI833MON3 w 014100'd a �� I NY1H1 } L 310N 335 .0 i 00 --0 ' 015 January 2, 1997 Spokane County Engineers 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Thank You, John E. McKervey Irr INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. ATTN: Mr. Bill Johns RE: Requirements for reinforced concrete Dear Bill: b t /O I would like to request information regarding the use of calcium as an admixture in reinforced concrete. The information I need is what is the maximum allowable percentage of calcium that can be added to reinforced concrete, and are there any special provisions for cold weather. I will appreciate any information you can provide me on this subject. If you have any questions please call me. PJDOCUAENTS196071- I\CONCRETTE wPF TO: o / $/7e d'u-t ATTENTION: gd 73-77 y Description n Xerox Prints n Original Drawing 0 Work Authorization No. Copies Purpose O Information .._ Written Approval Remarks Description ,/O_./1 I rr INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -6844 t ly /?7ee,'5 DATE: /c.2 - 3/- 7{0 I.P.E. PROJECT #' � PROJECT NAME- LW / a Copy of Letter fl Contract Documents O CI Report 0 Review & Comments - El Signature & Return Eater Your Request e - yV vt % Me. .7T�/1?2 'CC�• �•ILGI A t/ •� Signed cc: D \TRNSMT.PMS (SIDEWALK, SLOPE, RAF NAG E UTILITY ES MT.) (OLD RIGHT OF WAY) ( LOT 13, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1 ST ADDITION (SOUTH SIDE OF EXIST. HOUSE) (FACE OF CURB (TO FENCE) (NEW RIGHT OF WAY) MISSION AVENUE mre.I zrairl 5 ' /8/ 1 4' 0 N STALL WHEELCHAIR RAMP RIVERWALK 7TH ADDITION 1 '41 DATE . - 11/14/96 Q II DEAN • HOUSLEY COMPANY t) 3 1 ter ember 30, 1996 Mr. William A. Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 RE: P1414 - Rivenvalk P.U.D., Phase I - Indiana Cross -Gutter Work Dear Mr. Johns: This letter is in response to your letter of December 16, 1996 regarding the cross - gutter installation at Rivenvalk. We apologize for the mistakes that were made in the completion of this work. In our eagerness to complete the 1st Addition "loose ends" we made assumptions that were not correct. Since the cross -gutter was shown on the original North Idaho Engineering drawings approved by the County (with recent additional details for construction by IPE), we didn't focus on the fact that we were using a different concrete contractor for the work than the one used for the earlier 1st Addition work. We have always tried to use reputable contractors that are knowledgeable and well versed in Spokane County standards and construction practices, as that makes life easier for both the County and for us. In this case I gather the contractor both didn't get a permit, nor contact the County regarding the accelerating agent prior to the work as they should have (and used 1/2% more than is normally approved). As for a plan to avoid these mistakes in the future, we will certainly work more closely with contractors and the engineer both as regards the permits and the actual work itself. I am personally spending more time in Spokane as well while we work to complete the. I st Addition items, and will work closer with Ed Parry and Terry Lightfoot who have been most helpful in helping me understand and work through the issues. Regarding a mitigating measure for the non - compliant concrete work, could you please send me a copy of the County rules that applied to that situation so I can use it in working with the contractor to make a proposal to you. Thank you very much for your help and continued understanding as we clean up the Rivenvalk 1st Addition work. Sincerely, Mark B. Hancock Land Development Manager cc: Bill Hemmings, Ed Parry, Terry Lightfoot, Todd Whipple, Verne Jacobsen 16720 N.E. 116th Street • Redmond, Washington • 98052 • 206.869.6618 • Fax 206.869.6620 D E D I C•A T E D T O B U I � L D I N G • U A L I T Y H O M E S A N D C O M M U FROM: Mark Hancock @ DHC FAX MEMO December 30, 1996 Total Pages 2 TO: Todd Whipple n 1PE Mike Klika @ KC Construction Verne Jacobsen @ DHC RE: County Bond Set Aside, 1st Addition, Riverwalk Attached is Ed Parry's December 6 breakdown for the setaside bond work at the 1st Addition at Riverwalk. The amount currently sits at $50,975.62, and we need to get it down to the 10% that the County normally will agree to ASAP. Since 10% represents a final total bond of $18,830.00. we still need to get $32,145.62 cut out of this current amount. I've indicated next to each item who I think should work on it (in some cases we just need to confirm that the work was completed, and weather will obviously keep us from completing other work at the moment, but we should still go over each item and have a plan that leads to completion as soon as possible). Please look over these items and get back to me in the next few days on how we can finish this job. Thanks December 30, 1996 Total Pages s FAX MEMO TO: Todd Whipple @ IPE. Mike Klika @ KC Construction Verne Jacobsen @ DHC FROM: Mark Hancock RE: County Drawing Comments, 1st Addition, Riverwalk Attached is Ed Parry's December 9 letter that reviews the IPE drawing submittal for the 1st Addition at Riverwalk. While most of the items relate to drawing /calculation comments, some relate to the work itself. We won't get the 1st Addition accepted until the County inspects the work, and they won't do the inspection until Ed Parry is satisfied with the drawings. I've indicated next to each item who I think should work on it (and I know a few items are self evident, but will still require a response to the County). Please look over these pages and get back to me in the next few days on how we can finish this job. Thanks, Gentlemen: S P O K A N Drr5 ON OF ENGNEZ^:C AND ROADS William A. johns, P.E_. County Engines December 9, 1996 _ Todd Whipple, P.E. Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Addition Construction Documentation: 1st Submittal We have reviewed your recent submittal for this project; we are unable to accept the submittal at this time. A list of items needing attention is enclosed, and are indicated in red on the arached print. We note that may of the plan sheets for this project were not included with this submittal; Janelle Poe of your office indicated that the work on those facilities was not completed. Please ensure that the necessary corrections have been completed prior to the next submittal, and that a complete set of plans is submitted; incomplete submittals will not be accepted for review. A Joint Final Inspection for acceptance of the facilities by the County will not be conducted until all deficiencies indicated in the Construction Documentation are corrected. If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry at 456 -3600. Tnank you. Very truly yours, William A. Johns, P. E. Spokane County Engineer Edward f Jr., P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: project file reviewer Dean Housely Company (Mark Hancock) C O U N T Y • A Drvis;ou OF THE PuBuc WORKS DEPARmc• Dennis M. Scott, P.E. , Director 1026W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA99260 -01 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX (509) 324-3473 TDD: (509) 3243166 SUBMITTAL #: 1 (Record Drawings) — --PROJECT NAME:- Riverwalk ist Addition REVIEW CONLMENTS SPOKANE COUNTY DMSION OF ENGINEERfl4G & ROADS 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260-0710 PHONE (509)456 -3600 FAX (509)324 -3478 REVIEWER Ed Parry PROJECT #: P 1414 DATE: 9 December 96 GENERAL ITEMS: 1. Plan changes, approved by the County Engineer, for work not in conformance to the accepted plans, W were not received with this submittal. Plan changes were not processed prior to field imolemenration, H as required by the Standards i k 2. As- constructed floor dimensions were not provided for ponds varying from the accepted plans Vr^vE3. Have all punchlist items identified by the Construction Engineer been completed? N 4. Plans submitted for Record Drawings need to bear the label "Record Drawing ", per section 9.10 of the Standards I Sheet 1: Cover Sheet/Index - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned g to the County in Sheet 2: Indiana Avenue 1. Callouts CO the supplemental sheets should be provided for those items shown as deleted 3(C2. Why were the pedestrian curb ramps not installed? These items are required 3. Pond A a. Pipe invert is in a sump below the swale floor. Calculations to show that the pipe is t hydraulically adequate (i.e., at least .75' clearance is provided between the water surface elevation at 4 the upstream end of the pipe and the grate elevation) were not received with this submittal b. DryweIl grate (1 +16 RT, elevation 24.75 is more than .5' above the swale floor J elevation (23.52) and even exceeds the 8" maximum allowed for this drainage concept, if tests for organic carbon content had been provided SPE c. "End Pond" station is deleted. What station does the pond end at? REVIEW CONEMENTS 9 December 96 PROTECT # P1414 - Record Drawings SUB`TIT L&L # 1 Page 2 of 6 4. Pond F KG a. Drywell under sidewalk (Harmony Lane 4+90 LT): Has a solid locking cover, set at the sidewalk elevation, been provided so that the drywell can be cleaned? KG b. Catch basin rim elevation (27.70) only provides .35' average depth over the swale floor. Tnis is less than the .5' minimum noted in the Dec 85 amendment to the GSM - The constructed pipe_length is shorter than designed. Does this provide_adequate headspace _ _ between the water surface elevation and the rim elevation at the catch basin? 5. Was a plan change /design deviation processed to delete the curb returns for the extension of \j Harmony Lane north of Indiana? Todd Whipple's fax (dared 21 July 95) indicates that North Idaho 0- Engineers would be responsible for revising the project mylars on file at the County. The County has not•received a plan change request for this item to date. . Was the sidewalk constructed through the deleted entry of Harmony Lane north of.Indiana? �. 7. MCR elevation indicated at the west quadrant of Harmony/Indiana causes a sump condition at the curb ramp 8. Pond B 17E a. Rim elevation on drywell (28.62) needs to be coordinated with elevation shown on sheet 2S (28.68) 1GG b. Drywell at Indiana 5= 60/29.5'LT is more than 8' from the curb line. County Maintenance crews will be able to maintain this drywell 9. Pond C KG a. Rim elevation (27.78) provides .65' depth over floor elevation (27.13). Test results indicating that the topsoil contains at least the minimum specified organic carbon were not included with this submittal SpE b. Easement dimensions need to be shown on the revised detail 10. Pond M 'Ts a. Were the floor and rim elevations consructed in accordance with the accepted t Details (section and elevation views) of the Keystone block wall were not received with ' submittal. A plan change for this configuration has not been processed through the County Engineer's Office - 11. Pond N KC. a. Rim elevation (27.11) provides .66' depth over floor elevation (26.45). Test results indicating that the topsoil contains at least the minimum specified organic carbon were not included with this submittal REVIEW COND1EN"TS 9 December 96 PROJECT # P1414 - Record Drawin:s SUBNITITAL # 1 Page 3 of 6 b. Was the invert elevation of the roadside ditch checked? Does it provide at Zest 6" for water quality treatment before water enters the drywell? ,rE c. Was the pipe connecting the drainage structures checked for conformance to the accepted plans? Was- the concrete cross - gutter installed at Indiana/McMillan? How can the gutter function as designed if elevation at the middle of the curb return (MCR) (27.60) is so much lower than the flowline of the cross - guaer (27.76)? If the cross - gutter had not been installed at the time the Record Drawings were submitted, it should not be shown as having been installed. Y. Tne accepted plans indicated that the MCR at the east side of Indiana/McMillan would act as a break line to cause runoff from McMillan to flow south and into Pond N. The Record Drawings indicate that the drywells at the easterly terminus of Indiana will now receive runoff from an area not considered in the original design. Revised drainage calculations for this condition were not received with this submittal -rte L 1-4 Record Drawings for the sprinkler systems required in the swales serving Indiana Avenue were not received with this submiral. Sprinkler system callout is noted at Plan Revision #1 (Jul 95) on the accepted plans. Were the systems installed? 7. Pond D, Pond E: 1?E •EThese are located in Riverwalk 2nd Addition, and are identified as Pond "A" and Pond "C" respectively. The Record Drawings (Sheet 5R) for that project state that the sod and irrigation systems for those ponds had not been installed as of 29 Oct 96; the Record Drawings were submitted on 1 Nov 96. The swales, catch basins, drywells and pipes composing these facilities will also need to be completed, and Record Drawings (including the irrigation systems) submitted, prior to the acceptance of Indiana Avenue east of the plat boundary of Riverwalk 1st Addition. Acceptance of any road /drainage improvements in Riverwalk 1st Addition will not include the drywells at Station 11 +54 (LT & RT). The following comments pertain to private roads or facilities serving private roads. The Record Drawings for these improvements will be kept on file at the County as a pan of the public record for this project. Since the County does not bear any responsibility or liability in connection with private road and drainage improvements, the Developer Ls solely responsible for correcting the items noted and revising the Record Drawings, or not. Unless otherwise noted, acceptance of public roads, and drainage facilities serving public roads, will not be dependent upon correction of the following items. Sheet 3: Harmony Lane .A. Entry at west side of Mission Avenue was not constructed in accordance with the accepted plans; this item was identified to IPEC and the Developer in the summer of 1996. A plan change for this condidon was not submitted until the Construction Documents were received at the County Engineer's REVIEW COMLIvLENTS 9 December 96 PROJECT # P1414 - Record Drawinzs SLBNLITTAL # 1 Page 4 of 6 Office on 1 Nov 96. Calculations demonstrating how adequate stormwater management will be provided were not received with that plan change request. Preliminary comments on this plan change were provided to IPEC on 2 Dec 96. The plan change must be approved by the County Engineer's Office, and the work completed, prior to the County Engineer's acceptance of Mission Avenue. �— Pond L: Rim elevation (32.46) provides .66' depth over- floor elevation (31.72).- Test - results indicating that the topsoil contains at least the minimum specified organic carbon were not included with this submittal 3. Pond K lc a. There appears to be a 0.2' difference in the floor elevations (plan view vs. details) on the accepted plans. Was the floor elevation on this pond checked? If so, what is the as- constructed floor elevation? Tne best case results in a 1.9' depth between the rim and pond floor; maximum allowed is .66' (if the topsoil contains the minimum specified amount of organic carbon). KL b. Tne drywell at 13 +96.13 is 3' closer to the road than designed. What sort of safety /stability issues does this cause? A type R curb is considered to be a mountable curb, and is not considered to provide adequate protection from damage due CO collision with roadside facilities, or due to a vehicle running off the road, as does a type A curb. KC/IPC c. How did the Basin K dimensions change so as to provide only 389 ft' for 208 volume? The talcs indicate that these dimensions would provide —1140 ft' for water quality treatment at .5' depth. 4. Pond J K c a. Sheet 9B: The location of the 27.94 elevation is not clear between the plan view and the section view. Tne section view would indicate that the drywell at 16 +05 is below the pond floor, and that a depth of .5' is not provided between the pond floor (27.94) and the drywell rim at 15 +75 (28.11). KG, b. Rim elevation of drywell at 16+69 (28.44) provides more that the .66' max. allowed depth over the Swale floor (27.41) c. The CL offset of the drywell at 16 +69 needs to be clarified = a 0.74' offset puts the drywell just off the street centerline . Were ponds I1, 12 and I3 checked? ` Pond G: Rim elevation (27.77) provides .67' depth- over floor elevation (27.10). Test results indicating that the topsoil contains at least the minimum specified organic carbon were not included with this submina_1 "Sheet 4: Baldwin Lane /Augusta Lane - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County REVIEW COMLMEN 9 December 96 PROJECT 11 P1414 - Record Drawings SLBiVIITTAL 11 1 Sheet 5: McMillan Lane No comments at this time Page 5 of 6 Sheet 6: Barker Road (14 +50 to 24 +00) - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County ' Sheet 7: Mission Avenue (10 +00 to 19 +00) - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County see 'Sheet 8: Details - Not. received with this submittal; ori mylar needs to be returned to the County r Sheet 9: Derails - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County Sheet 9A Pond H: Rim elevation (27.73) provides .63' depth over floor elevation (27.10). Test results indicating that the topsoil contains at least the minimum specified organic carbon were not included with this submittal Was the invert elevation of the roadside ditch checked? Does it provide at least 6" for water quality ¢eatment before water enters the drywell? If more than 6" depth is provided, does the topsoil contain at least the minimum specified amount of organic carbon? Max. depth is 8" from rim to ditch invert: lQ� Sheet 9B 1. Basin 0: The plans for McMillan Lane indicate that a catch basin and drywell were installed at this - pond; this was not indicated on the plans accepted for construction. Detail needs to be coordinated with the plans ' T Was basin P checked? Sheet 9C: Sight Distances - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County REVIEW COMMENTS 9 December 96 PROJECT 11 P1414 - Record Drawinas SUBMITTAL # 1 Sheet 1S 1. Concrete core 2. The thickness Gifford's report, S heet 2S . Rim elevation H/8 is not indicated on the map of asphalt core #4 in Table 1 of the report has been coordinated with the data in per Ed Parry's telephone conversation with Todd Whipple on 4 Dec 96 Page 6 of 6 for drywell in Pond B needs to be coordinated with the elevation shown on Sheet 2 N • 0 0 0 w w 0 0 161 Monuments 0 171Oar/Icor le 161 Sltoct Signs CO 0 O N '-1 10 CO N 0 CI N PROJECT: P1414 - Rlvorwalk I st Addition Ilond Reduction #2 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Wilberl Vault Curb Inlet 2) 0' underdraln too Keystone Wall • 356 LF 3) Keystone Block Wall - 332 LF 4a) Irrigation systems • Indiana Ave 414 As- builts lot " " • 5a) Irrigation systems Mission Ave 414 As- bullts lor " " GRADING, SURFACING, CURD, AND SIDEWALK "Indiana Avo & Mission Avo 19) Rough Grade • 20) Top Courso 21) Base Courso 221 Asphalt Condon 23) Curb Typo A 24) Curb Type 13 26) Curb Typo R 26) Sidewalk • Mission Avo 19) Rough Grade 20) Top Courso 21) Daso Coursa 221 Asphalt Concrete 23) Curb Type A 241 Curb Type B 261 Curb Type R 261 Sidewalk 11/ 1 1106 STIMATE osllmalad by EJP DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE 1) Drywall - Typo A EA 1 1250.00 21 Orywoll' Typo 13 EA 5 1650,00 31 Grate - Typo 1 EA 316,00 41 Orato Type 2 1 EA 4 340.00 61 Grale - Type 4 EA 3 300.00 63) Backlit' For OW CY 230 16.00 6b) Filler Fabric lor DIN SY 3400 0.25 7) Catch Basin ' EA 4 750.00 B) Pipe 10' Dla. LF 23.00 Bel Pipe 12" Dla. CMP LF 72 27.00 c 9b) Pipo 12" Dia. Duclilo Iron LF 60 40.00 53 101 Pipe 16" Dla. CM!' I 44 27.80 61 111 Pipe 10" DIG. I 31 .60 Yi 12) Precast Monholo LA 1600.00 Eft 13) Solid Ikl EA 3 310.00 u 14a) Earthwork • Cut Indiana CY 249 10.00 Mission CY 0 10.00 14b) Enrlllwork - Fill CY 0 10,00 CY 0 10.00 15)Sod 1 SF 0.70 16) Hydrosoed Indiana SF 17501 0.07 Mission SE 0 0,07 Feq Cy 10.00 CY 16.00 CY 16.00 Tons 44.40 LE 7.00 LF 0.00 LF 0,00 SO YO 16,70 Provllous reduction Cuurent Surety DATE .- Doc -90 Initial EA 6 900.00 5400.00 LS 1 7500.00 7500.00 LS , 1 5000.00 5000.00 EA 0 1600.00 0.00 EA , 0 250.00 0.00 EA 0 1500.00 0.00 EA 0 250.00 0.00 COST C11 1250.00 0250.00 0.00 1360,00 900.00 3600.00 060.00 3000.00 0.00 1944,00 2400.00 1223.20 0.00 0.00 930.00 2490.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 1230.67 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 47407.07 .. . EA 6 105,00 1110.00 LF 0 33.00 0.00 EA 3 05.00 256.00 OTHEfl SUUTOTAI 1365.00 CY 2660.7 10.00 26687.00 CY 1019.4 16.00 16310.40 CY 1 6,00 0.00 T ons 1070.3 44.40 47621,32 LF 7.00 0.00 LI: 2557.0 0.00 20462,40 LF 0.00 0,00 50 YO 1705.2 1 6, 70 20476.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 -. "GRADING AND SURFACING i1 139457;96 Add GRAND TOTAL 100,230,03 Required Sur ety 100,300,00 111,600.00 76,700.0C ; • Y D Pllose 2 PRICE COST 1250,00 . 0.00 1560.00: 3120.00 316.00 0.00 340,00; 600,00 300.00 0.00 16.00 1200.00 0.25 300.00 750,00 : 1600.00 23.00 0.00 27.70 1210.00 40.00 0.00 27.60 1223.20 31.60 0.00 1500.00 0.00 310.00 620.00 10.00 1610.00 10,00 , 0,00 10,00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.70 0.00 0,07 707.00 0.07 0.00 1215 9.00 900.00 0.00 7600.00 0.00 5000.00 0,00 1600,00 3000.00 260.00 500.00 1600.00 , 0.00 250.00 . 0.00 15659.00 105.00 0,00 33.00 0.00 05.00 0.00 urel 10.00 0.00 10,00 0.00 16.00 0.00 44.40 0.00 7.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.70' 0.00 10.00 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 0.00 44.40 0.00 7.00 0,00 5.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 16,70 0,00 0.00 OTIIL'I151113101AL 0.00 15,559.00 Al lo Phase 1 UNITS EA EA EA EA EA CY SY EA LF LF LF LF I.F EA EA CY CY CY CY SF SF SF EA LS LS EA LEA EA EA EA LE EA Mission Ave CY CY CY Tons LE LP 1.F so YD GRANO TOTAL DATE or, -• •-96 c QUANTITY I'IIICE COST 1 1250.00 1250.00 3 1560.00 4600.00 315.00 0.00 2 340.00 600.00 3 300.00 900.00 150 16.00 2400.00 2200 016 550.00 2 750.00 1500.00 23.00 0.00 I 46.00 27.70 1246.50 GO 40.00 2400.00 27.00 0.00 31.50 0.00 1 500.00 . 0.00 1 310.00 310.00 99 10.00 990.00 26,1 10.00 261,00 0 10.00 0.00 0 10.00 0.00 0.70 0.00 7401 0.07 523.67 1316 0,07 92.12 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL Indiana Ave CY 1 2519.7 CY 944.9 CY Tons 960.5 LF LP 2400.3 LP SO YD 1000.2 149 74.5 101.0 167.5 105 5 900.00 4500.00 1 7600.00 7600.00 1 5000.00 5000.00 3 1500.00 4600.00 3 260.00 760,00 1 1500.00 1600,00 1 250.00 260.00 6 186.00 1110.00 0 33.00 0.00 3 115.00 255.00 • GRADING AND SURFACING 10,00 16.00 16.00 44.40 7.00 11.00 11.00 16.70 10.00 16.00 16.00 44.40 7.00 0.00 11.00 16,70 41703.29 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 1305.00 OTNEII SUBTOTAL 251 97.00 15110.40 0.00 43001.40 0.00 19202.40 0,00 26723.34 1490.00 1 19 2.00 0.00 4519.97 0.00 1260.00 0.00 1763.50 139457.96 'I 102,606.26 Surely adlunlmmN for Plmso 1 punrhlIsl adjusted % retained bond amount to Final Insp 200 1050.00 KC , 20.00% 750 3930.00 j<C 20.00% 0.00 680.00 KC 20,00% 900.00 KC- 20.00% 2400.00 KC 20.00% 650.00 K C 20.00% 1500.00 KC- 20.00".6. 0.00 1246,60 KC 20.00% 2400.00 K C 20.00% 0.00 6000.00 4000.00 t c Total Surely necessary Current Surety Surety lo be released 2 0.00 0.00 310,00 990.00 261.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 523.67 92.12 4500.00 7500.00 6000.00 4600.00 760.00 1600.00 260.00 1110.00 .$ QW E •! 0000`} 0.00. 0.00% 255.00 VErajC 00,000 2.61 97.00 15110.40 0.00 30001.40 0.00 16202,40 0.00 26723.34 1490.00 1192.00 0.00 4519.92 0.00 1260.00 0.00 1753.60 130467.00 130,457.96 tCC Kc KG 20.00% 2.0,00% 100.00% Venue 15.00% MINE 100.00% //EBLUE 1 16.00% VigLsre 20.00% yeast 20.00% Vezue T00.00% WE 100.00% V6 100.00% lee 100.00% ✓ 10.00% 10.00% ✓ 10.00% `-' 10.00% ✓ 10.00% t(G :.loo'od9� KC; >Kc ': KC, X 1_00* KG 100.00% Relelnapo Phase 1 Purtchllsl Drywalls KG 950.00 Cross - putter vcc C*5090.00 Sidewalk Rolm KC.. 'ARMS 9960,00 Total Retained 210.00 706.00 0.00 136,00 180.00 400.00 110.00 300.00 0.00 240.30 400.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 62.00 190.00 261.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70,65 92.12 p9 6 3622.97 576.00 1500.00 1000.00 4600.00 750.00 1600.00 260.00 17420.94 1 1 10.00 0,00 205.00 ±305.00 . 2519.70 1611.04 0.00 3000.14 0.00 1620.24 0,00 2672.33 1490.00 1 19 2.00 0.00 4519.92 0.00 1260.00 0.00 • 1753.50 22239.67 41,025.02 60975.62 76700,00 25724.39 December 24, 1996 IPE W.O. #96106 Spokane County Public Works Department Development Engineering Services 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 Attn: Ed Parry, Jr., P.E. Dear Ed: RE: Riverwalk 1st Addition (P1414 -A) Request for Design Deviation for the sidewalk location and Mission Avenue cross - section Enclosed please find the following in reference to the Design Deviation for the sidewalk location on Lot 13, Block 1 of Riverwalk 1st Addition: 1.) A cross section for Mission Avenue as provided to us from your office for the approved cross section, for your easy reference. 2.) A cross section of Mission Avenue, modified for the area between the west plat boundary and the east curb return station on Mission, stamped and signed by the engineer, Todd Whipple. (See attached exhibit.) 3.) A cross section of Mission Avenue with an 8' cross section for `208' treatment and snow storage, which will be the case when a third lane is added to Mission Avenue. This exhibit is also stamped and signed by the engineer. (See attached exhibit.) We are requesting your approval of the Design Deviation. Your prompt attention to this submittal would be greatly appreciated. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Inlaid Pacif ••n ineering Co pany Todd R. W ple, P.E TRW /skm cc: file DocunwN196J06Uut3 in INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. 12' 12' TRAFFIC 20' 30' EXIST. PAVEMENT EXIST. 12' TRAFFIC R/W .0200 FT/F7 MIN 5" COMPACTED CLASS "A' ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/47. TO 6 1/47. ASPHALT ON 7" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. BIKE LANE (NOT TO SCALE) EXIST. 4" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/47. TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 6" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D:O.T, SPECIFICATIONS. MODIFIED MISSION AVENUE CROSS SECTION STA. 14 +98.96 TO STA. 15 +90.08 LT. RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION 4' 2' PROP. R/W 55' 25' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE AND SLOPE EASEMENT 10' FUTURE ACQUISITION TYPE "B" CURB TYPICAL CROSS - SECTION MISSION AVENUE 15' '208' TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE 6' SIDEWALK 2% MIN s `GiS ..C;SI �. V 9/244 i tc 707 West 7th • Suite Spokane, WA 99204 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 200 (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 12' TRAFFIC 30' 12' TRAFFIC 40' EXIST. EXIST. E.O.P. I R/W 2 14' TRAFFIC 55' .0200 FT /FT MIN 5" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" OMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. RIVERWALK 1 ST ADDITION (FORMER 10' FUTURE ACQUISITION) PROP. 15' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE R/W AND SLOPE EASEMENT '208' TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE 4 1 8 ' TYPE • B" CURB 6' SIDEWALK 2% MIN TYPICAL CROSS SECTI (NOT TO SCALE) ai17,'. A EC 234,52. • C?\ t S1ER� E XIST. 4" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE r i �� CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 6" MISSION AVENUE : COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ' " �� ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. E ' =C 9 ' ;' MODIFIED MISSION AVENUE CROSS SECTION INLAND STA. 14 +98.96 TO STA. 15 +90.08 LT. i � PA EN CdINE ERIN<3 707 We 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 Drown By. Dolt E.J.P. 08/94 SC ALE HORIZONTAL: NONE OsKZ OF . SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER W. 1026 RROADWAY AVE. SPO %ANDSA,��280 OUD ' APPROVED S �` M J J ON A VE N U E EAST OF BARKER ROAD TYPiCA� ROADWAY SECTION • SHEET I y 01 DesIonee By E.J.P. 08/94 4,a COUNTY ENGINEER Data' s o / � ., (' l4 R 1 Checked 8$ ) VERTICAL: NONE MISSION AVENUE (SYR.) C/L 12' TRAFF.T: TRAFFIC/ 2C LANE 216 LAN ACP CL. ACP CL. LQST< PLR R -VAMUE TESTING R/W i (Rnh) E TOTAL ACP DEPTH 1 FUTURE ACCUISn11071 TYPE • 9 • CV R9 Watt AS REQUIRED ORMNAGL AND SIDEWALK EASENEN 205 TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE E' 1 SIDEWALK I 2% NN L-T/G ! 0,2' L E NIMTIUII WATER DEPTH FOR 208 OA' MINIMUM 9EPTN FOR STORM VOLUME MAXMU.M WATER SURFACE ELEVADC.V ODES NOT ENCROACH ON FUTURE ACOUSIDLIN AREA XSEC004 citt 19 X0, - O�v ``. O K A N e VIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer December 18, 1996 Todd Whipple, P.E. Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D., Phase 1 Plan Revisions: Mission Avenue/Harmony Lane Gentlemen: As you agreed to in your 13 Dec 96 conversation with Bill Hemmings of our office, "preliminary" submittals (i.e., not intended for County review /acceptance) would not need to bear a signed, dated P.E. stamp; however, the submittal would need to bear some sort of indication that it was indeed "preliminary ", such as a stamped marking. Submittals for the County's review /acceptance would need to bear a signed, dated P.E. stamp. We then received the enclosed submittal from you on 13 Dec 96, in which you request the County's] review and acceptance of the enclosed plans. "; this is essentially the same letter and plan set submitted on 10 Dec 96. This indicates to us that these are not preliminary plans, and implies that the plans should bear the signed, dated P.E. stamp. You will see that the plans bear neither a signed, dated P.E. stamp nor any 'narking indicating that they are "preliminary ". Please clarify the purpose of this submittal; based on your previous submittals and feedback provided by the County Engineer's staff, it would appear that we concur on the concept of the plan change. If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours illia'1t -AC. John'. E. Spokane County Engineer encls A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director cc: Spokane County Public Works Director: Dennis Scott, P.E. Spokane County Engineer's Office: Bill Hemmings, P.E. Ed Parry, P.E. Sponsor: Mark Hancock, Dean Housely Company, 16720 N.E. 116th Street, Redmond, WA 98052 Project File 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 December 13, 1996 IPE W.O. #96106 Attn: Ed Parry, Jr., P.E. Dear Ed: We have provided with this letter: DorumenI961066ubl ire INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Spokane County Public Works Department Development Engineering Services 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 RE: Riverwalk 1st Addition (P1414 -A) Revised sidewalk location and Mission Avenue cross - section Information for Evaluation of the Design Devation dated 11 -8 -96 In response to your fax of December 2nd to our office, please find enclosed a revised plan for the sidewalk location on Lot 13, Block 1 of Riverwalk 1st Addition. Please note that the west curb ramp has been realigned directly opposite the east curb ramp as you had requested. 1.) A cross section for Mission Avenue as provided to us from your office for the approved cross section, for your easy reference: 2.) A cross section of Mission Avenue, modified for the area between the west plat boundary and the east curb return station on Mission. The approved cross section called out in the - Conditions of Approval does not specify the width of the '208' treatment area, though the sidelopes and minimum depth require at least 8.9' to the face of the sidewalk, including the .2' elevation above the top of curb elevation. The cross section has an 18' wide section for '208' treatment and snow storage, if the 10' future acquisition area is utilized. (See attached exhibit.) 3.) A cross section of Mission Avenue with an 8' cross section for '208' treatment and snow storage, which will be the case when a third lane is added to Mission Avenue. (See attached exhibit.) Because there is no curb inlet along the existing curbline, we do not anticipate that there will 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509 -458 -6844 Pre- '?9 i 1FC: 1 3 1996 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suit= 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 8381 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208 -769 werb'iNE ENGINEER Spokane County December 13, 1996 Page 2 be any `208' treatment in this cross section. Therefore, the need for storage, treatment and disposal at this time can be negated. The finished ground profile slopes from east to west, and at the time the commercial property is developed to the west of the Riverwalk 1st plat and Mission Avenue is extended, drainage for this area will need to be addressed. The basin map and drainage report in our files from North Idaho Engineering do not indicate any drainage improvements along this section of Mission Avenue. We respectfully remind you that the Riverwalk 1st plans were not designed by this firm,.nor constructed under our supervision, and our recourse in helping Dean - Housley get this Design Deviation approved is limited to providing information to you of the existing as -built conditions. Your understanding in this regard is greatly appreciated. We are requesting your review audartce of the enclosed z . Your prompt attention to this submittal would be greatly appreciated. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Inlaid Pacific gmeering Company • Todd R. Whipple, P.E TRW /skm cc: file Enc. Docnme (196f06bubl CC: List In;ti9L; , : - . , o --' Ott 10 \gg6 vij,•P 0 K A N H DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer December 16, 1996 Mark Hancock Dean Housely Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, WA 98052 efodd Whipple, P.E. Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D., Phase 1 Unauthorized Work in Indiana Ave R/W Use of Curing Accelerator in Concrete Gentlemen: • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director I have been informed that you have installed the cross -gutter at the intersection of Indiana Avenue and McMillan Lane; this item had not been installed as required on the approved plans for this project. 1 understand that the contractor incorporated an accelerating agent (calcium chloride) in the amount of 11/2 % (by weight); please be advised that the County Specifications do not allow the use of any accelerating agent on a general basis. If the contractor desires to use accelerating agent, then specific approval must be obtained from the County Engineer prior to placement of the work; the addition of an accelerating agent is limited to no more than 1% by weight. This procedure and standard has been in effect for more than a few years, and your contractor (Winkler) should have no reason not to be aware of this. 1 have also been informed that your contractor performed this work without securing a permit, as required by Spokane County Code. This is the second instance on this project where your contractors have performed work in the County right of way without a permit. Your construction engineer is responsible for enforcing the construction standards. This includes ensuring that permits are secured, and that materials meet Specifications, or that non - standard construction has been approved by the County Engineer prior to installation in the field. 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 Mark Hancock • Todd Whipple, P.E. P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D., Phase 1 Unauthorized Work in Indiana Ave R/W Use of Curing Accelerator in Concrete December 16, 1996 Page 2 of 2 Any further instances of this type of activity will leave me no option but to take such actions as are necessary to ensure that the work that is installed in strict accordance with the approved plans and Specifications. This may include, but is not limited to revocation of plan, approval, revocation of permits, or removal of non - compliant work. Please provide a written plan of how you intend to modify your procedures to preclude this type of situation again, as well as some sort of mitigating measure for the non - compliant concrete work. 1 would like to see this no later than December 27, 1996. If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, illiam .Johns, Spokane County Engineer cc: Bill Hemmings, Ed Parry, Terry Lightfoot INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Telephone - (509) 458 -6840 FAX - (509) 458 -6844 NOTES: e • DAT • TO: GO- • COMPANY: • FAX NUMBER: - mac IA • FROM: S • NUMBER OF PAGES: INCL. COVER PAGE ti PP 1 <-- -P4 . % /0(e , JOB NUMBER FAX TRANSMISSION II December 12, 1996 W.O. No. 96106 Spokane County Public Works W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Attn: Bill Johns, P E Re: County Stamping Requirements Dear Bill: Bill, I am so tired of having things returned with the enclosed letter from your office that I finally thought that it was time that you and your office understand what needs to be stamped and what does not. I called the Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors on this issue and they pointed out to me some guidance that had been printed in one of their newsletters, copies of these are enclosed. The Board indicated to nie that general correspondence dealing with PROPOSED ACTIONS DO NOT HAVE TO BE STAMPED until the fmal plans and specifications are submitted. They indicated that when you stamp everything, it becomes to difficult to account for everything that was stamped when trying to void all of the proposed material if changes to the proposals occur. This means everyone's liability goes up, including the County for requiring final stamps on proposals. Therefore, you MUST advise your staff as to the boards status on this issue. The two excerpts mailed to you were from the December 1989 and January 1991 New Bulletins from the Board. Thank you for you time. Sincerely, InlagJ Pacific E veering Co., Inc: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. TRW /tw r Todd R. Whipple, P.E. I rr cc: Phil Harris, Spokane County Commissioner Dennis Scott, Spokane County Director of Public Works file 707 Wesl 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 509 -458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458.6844 208 -765 -7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 Gentlemen: DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer December 11, 1996 Todd Whipple, P.E. Inland Pacific Engineering 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Mark Hancock Stanton Development /Dean Housely Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Bellevue, WA 98052 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Addition Revisions at Mission /Harmony • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director We note in your submittal (dated 10 Dec 96) of the plan revision at this proposed plan nor section views bear a signed, dated, P.E. stamp. We are submittal unreviewed. Please ensure that all submittals conform to County standards. If you have any Ed Parry at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, William A. Johns, P. E.- — — Spokane County Engineer Edward P , P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: project file reviewer location that neither the therefore returning this questions, please contact 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • ,(509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 3 KNOWING YOUR LAW USE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR LAND SURVEYOR STAMP The law requires the professional engineer and land surveyor to obtain a stamp and to use said stamp on official plans and documents. The practical application of this requirement varies widely within the engineering and land surveying community and this has given rise to a number of significant questions on how and when the stamp should be used. In response to these questions and in light of some of the Boards's concerns, the Board has prepared a policy state- ment. • An official design for the stamp is also in the process of development. The present design, while it has the weight of precedence and tacit board acceptance, was never officially adopted by the Board. The new design will be similar to old design but there will be a distinctive difference between the engineer and the land surveyor stamps. The following policy statement has been approved by the Board and staff has been directed to prepare for adoption into the Washington Administrative Code (WAC 196). When adopted this rule will have the effect of law. Prior to adop- tion, the Board will conduct a public hearing at which writ- ten and oral testimony will be received. PLAN STAMPING POLICY Plan Set Stamping Every page of a plan set must contain the stamp /seal, signature and date of the licensee who performed, directly supervised, or was in responsible charge of the work. a. All revisions must be dated on the page illustrated. b. Plans containing more than one licensee's work must be stamped by each and the document must be clearly noted as to the extent of each engineer's work. Document Stamping Any final document of a technical nature requiring engineering and /or land surveying knowledge must contain the licensee's stamp /seal, signature and date of affixing said stamp /seal. a. The signature shall be placed across the stamp /seal. b. The date -shall be placed in close proximity to the stamp /seal so it may be identified as the stamp /seal date. c. Unfinished documents released from the licensee's con- trol may or may not be stamped and signed but must have the licensee identified on it's face. d. Unfinished documents released from the licensee's con- trol must be clearly identified as "PRELIMINARY" or other such wording so it may be differentiated from a final document. Specifications Specifications must contain the licensee's stamp /seal. signature and date. Said stamp /seal shall appear in a con- spicuous location that clearly identifies the work performed by the licensee. eve-m04 -?-10144 Pc 13001 CORPORATE .PRACTICE Every corporation practicing, or offering to practice, engineer- ing in the state of Washington must do so under a current certifi- cate of authorization issued by the Washington State Board of Registration for Engineers and Land Surveyors in accordance with RCW 18.43.130, paragraph (8). Any corporation wishing to obtain certification is required to file an application with the Board containing information required to enable the Board to determine whether such corporation is qualified, in accordance with the provisions of the referenced RCW, to practice engineering in the state. The Board office should be contacted for details on how to apply and what is required in the application. The initial certificate fee is $300.00. The renewal fee is $175.00 per year. The law is specific and quite detailed as to the requirements for certification and as to the practice of engineering as a corpo- ration. It is recommended that prospective applicants obtain a copy of the law and study the referenced paragraph. It would be advisable for the corporation officers and particu- larly the engineer identified as in full authority to make all final engineering decisions on behalf of the corporation and the engineers designated as in responsible charge of each project or major branch of engineering to study the referenced paragraph. The corporation is required to delegate significant authority to the designated engineers and these engineers assume major responsibilities. The law requires the Board to be informed as to whom these engineers are and to be notified whenever changes are made in this delegation of authority. The law requires this delegation of authority to be honored ' explicitly in the conduct of the engineering work of the corporation. The following are some of the most significant- requirements of the law. These statements are illustrative of the requirements of the law but are neither complete nor exact copies of the law. 1. The corporation, by a resolution of the Board of Directors, shall designate an engineer registered under the provisions of RCW 18.43 as responsible for the practice of engineering by the corporation. The resolution shall provide that full authority to make all final engineering decisions on behalf of the corporation with respect to work performed in the state shall be granted and delegated to the designated engineer. 2. The corporation shall identify in writing the engineers in responsible charge of each project and each major branch of engineering in which the corporation shall specialize in the state. In the event there a change in the designated engineer, the Board shall be notified in writing within thirty days. 3. All plans, specifications, designs, and reports, when issued in connection with work performed by a corporation under its certificate of authorization, shall be prepared by or under the responsible charge of and shall be signed by and shall be stamped with the official seal of a person holding a certificate of registra- tion under RCW 18.43. 4. Any corporation authorized to practice engineering under RCW 18.43, together with its directors and officers for their own individual acts, are responsible to the same degree as an individual registered engineer, and must conduct its business without mis- conduct or malpractice in the practice of engineering as defined in RCW 18.43. 5. Any corporation which has been duly certified under the provisions of RCW 18.43 and has engaged in the practice of engineering shall have its certificate of authorization either sus- pended or revoked by the Board if after a proper hearing, the Board shall find the corporation has committed malpractice or misconduct as defined in RCW 18.43.105. Any individual engineer holding a certificate of registration under RCW 18.43 who is involved in such practice is also subject to disciplinary action. DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer December 11, 1996 Todd Whipple, P.E. Inland Pacific Engineering 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Mark Hancock Stanton Development /Dean Housely Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Bellevue, WA 98052 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Addition Revisions at Mission /Harmony Gentlemen: We note in your submittal (dated 10 Dec 96) of the plan revision at this location that neither the proposed plan nor section views hear a signed, dated, P.E. stamp. We are therefore returning this submittal unreviewed. Please ensure that all submittals conform to County standards. If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, William A. Johns, P. E. Spokane County Engineer 7 � P.E. Edward Pa r., .E Plan Review Engineer cc: project file reviewer • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director RECEIVED DEC 11 1996 I.P.E. 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 December 10, 1996 IPE W.O. #96106 Attn: Ed Parry, Jr., P.E. Dear Ed: We have provided with this letter: in INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Spokane County Public Works Department Development Engineering Services 1026 W. Broadway Avenue -- _. .. Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 RE: Riverwalk 1st Addition (P1414 -A) Revised sidewalk location and Mission Avenue cross - section In response to your fax of December 2nd to our office, please find enclosed a revised plan for the sidewalk location on Lot 13, Block 1 of Riverwalk 1st Addition. Please note that the west curb ramp has been realigned directly opposite the east curb ramp as you had requested. 1.) A cross section for Mission Avenue as provided to us from your office for the approved cross section, for your easy reference. 2.) A cross section of Mission Avenue, modified for the area between the west plat boundary and the east curb return station on Mission. The approved cross section called out in the Conditions of Approval does not specify the width of the `208' treatment area, though the sidelopes and minimum depth require at least 8.9' to the face of the sidewalk, including the .2' elevation above the top of curb elevation. The cross section has an 18' wide section for `208' treatment and snow storage, if the 10' future acquisition area is utilized. (See attached exhibit.) 3.) A cross section of Mission Avenue with an 8' cross section for `208' treatment and snow storage, which will be the case when a third lane is added to Mission Avenue. (See attached exhibit.) Because there is no curb inlet along the existing curbline, we do not anticipate that there will ?Ot' be any `208' treatment in this cross section. Therefore, the need for stora H i ?tA DEC 1 D 1996 Docanent1961061mb r 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509 -458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 20 SPOIIANE COUNTY ENGINEER Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 - 765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 Spokane County December 10, 1996 Page 2 disposal at this time can be negated. The finished ground profile slopes from east to west, and at the time the commercial property is developed to the west of the Riverwalk 1st plat and Mission Avenue is extended, drainage for this area will need to be addressed. The basin map and drainage report we have from North Idaho Engineering do not indicate any drainage improvements along this section of Mission Avenue. We respectfully remind you that the Riverwalk 1st plans were not designed by this firm, nor constructed under our supervision, and our recourse in helping Dean - Housley get this Design Deviation approved is limited to providing information to you of the existing as -built conditions. Your understanding in this regard is greatly appreciated. We are requesting your review and acceptance of the enclosed plans. Your prompt attention to this submittal would be greatly appreciated. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Inland Pacific E Todd R. Whipple, P.E TRW /skm cc: file Enc. Documeml96105bubI ering Company MI6501 AYEMJE (5111.} CA ACP Cl. 'A' i• (min) ACP R. 'E' 707AL ACP DEPTH CSTC PER R -VALUE TESTING FUTURE 0 , ACCUIEFRON TYPE '9' CURS � + D.2 I 8' NIN'MUM WATER DEPTH 1011 208 os .MAXANV WATER PSUREAACCESELEVATION I D005 NOT ENCROACH ON FUTURE ACOIASITIDN AREA Cat NC aww RECEIVED DEC 10 1996 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER R Drown By. Dols E. J.P. 08/94 Deayned B7: E.J.P. 08 9a Chested 8y. j --+-- SCALE HORIZONTAL: NONE VERTICAL: NONE WFIQ OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER W. 1025 BROADWAY AVE SPDXANE. WA. 9924D -0170 4 38-3500 APPRO VED: COUNTY ENGINEER Dole: qY MISSION AVENUE EAST OF BARKER ROAD TYPICAL R OADWAY SECTION • SHEET 1 of 1 XSEC0045.044 12' TRAFFIC 20' 30' EXIST. PAVEMENT EXIST. 12' 12' R/W TRAFFIC .0200 FT /FT MIN 5" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. 4' BIKE LANE PROP. R/W (NOT TO SCALE) EXIST. 4' COMPACTED CLASS "A' ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 6" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. 55' 25' SIDEWALK. DRAINAGE AND SLOPE EASEMENT 10' FUTURE ACQUISITION 5:1 TYPE "B" CURE TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION MISSION AVENUE '208' TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE A ; 1 15' 6' SIDEWALK 2% MIN RECEIVED DEC 10 1996 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER I MODIFIED MISSION AVENUE CROSS SECTION STA. 14 +98.96 TO STA. 15 +90.08 9 1 RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION -' - - -_' 1 J INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -8840 Spokane, WA • 99204 FM: (509) 458 -6844 12' TRAFFIC 30' 12' TRAFFIC 40' EXIST. EXIST. E.O.P. R/W 121 14' 55' TRAFFIC .0200 FT /FT MIN 5" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. (Nor EXIST. 4" COMPACTED CLASS "A' ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 6" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. (FORMER 10' FUTURE ACQUISITION) PROP. R/W TYPICAL TO SCALE) TYPE "B" CURB' MODIFIED MISSION AVENUE CROSS SECTION STA. 14 +98.96 TO STA. 15 +90.08 LT. RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION 15' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE AND SLOPE EASEMENT 8' '208' TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE MISSION AVENUE 6' SIDEWALK 2% MIN CROSS- SECTION g 1 4t+ ?(Itr(Uratitz RECEIVED DEC 10 1996 SPOKANE COUNTY ENG;NEER 1' 1 Is INLAND PACIFIC ENQINEERINQ 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 (SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE UTILITY ESMT.) (OLD RIGHT OF WAY) n LOT 13, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1 ST ADDITION (SOUTH SIDE OF EXIST. HOUSE) (FACE OF CURB (TO FENCE) (NEW RIGHT OF WAY) MISSION AVENUE 5' 1 14' LLi z: Q : >-' z 0 NSTALL WHEELCHAIR RAMP RIVERWALK 7TH ADDITION 1 DATE 1 1 /1496 Gentlemen: DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E., County Engines& December 9, 199 C \ 9 199 Todd Whipple, P.E. Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Addition Construction Documentation: 1st Submittal We have reviewed your recent submittal for this project; we are unable to accept the submittal at this time. A list of items needing attention is enclosed, and are indicated in red on the attached print. We note that may of the plan sheets for this project were not included with this submittal; Janelle Poe of your office indicated that the work on those facilities was not completed. Please ensure that the necessary corrections have been completed prior to the next submittal, and that a complete set of plans is submitted; incomplete submittals will not be accepted for review. A Joint Final Inspection for acceptance of the facilities by the County will not be conducted until all deficiencies indicated in the Construction Documentation are corrected. If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, William A. Johns, P. E. Spokane County Engineer Edward P y, Jr., P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: project file reviewer Dean Housely Company (Mark Hancock) • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 PROJECT #: P1414 PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk 1st Addition REVIEW COMMENTS SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING & ROADS 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260 -0710 PHONE (509)456 -3600 FAX (509)324 -3478 2. Why were the pedestrian curb ramps not installed? These items are required c j I UG em, T rZ w SUBMITTAL #: 1 (Record Drawings) REVIEWER: Ed Parry DATE: 9 December 96 GENERAL ITEMS: 1. Plan changes, approved by the County Engineer, for work not in conformance to the accepted plans, were not received with this submittal. Plan changes were not processed prior to field implementation, as required by the Standards 2. As- constructed floor dimensions were not provided for ponds varying from the accepted plans 3. Have all punchlist items identified by the Construction Engineer been completed? 4. Plans submitted for Record Drawings need to bear the label "Record Drawing ", per section 9.10 of the Standards Sheet 1: Cover Sheet /Index - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County Sheet 2: Indiana Avenue 1. Callouts to the supplemental sheets should be provided for those items shown as deleted 3. Pond A a. Pipe invert is in a sump below the swale floor. Calculations to show that the pipe is hydraulically adequate (i.e., at least .75' clearance is provided between the water surface elevation at the upstream end of the pipe and the grate elevation) were not received with this submittal b. Drywell grate (1 +16 RT, elevation 24.75) is much more than .5' above the swale floor elevation (23.52) and even exceeds the 8" maximum allowed for this drainage concept, if tests for organic carbon content had been provided c. "End Pond" station is deleted. What station does the pond end at? REVIEW COMMENTS 9 December 96 PROJECT # P1414 - Record Drawings SUBMITTAL # 1 Page 2 of 6 4. Pond F a. Drywell under sidewalk (Harmony Lane 4 +90 LT): Has a solid locking cover, set at the sidewalk elevation, been provided so that the drywell can be cleaned? b. Catch basin rim elevation (27.70) only provides .35' average depth over the swale floor. This is less than the .5' minimum noted in the Dec 85 amendment to the GSM c. The constructed pipe length is shorter than designed. Does this provide adequate headspace between the water surface elevation and the rim elevation at the catch basin? 5. Was a plan change /design deviation processed to delete the curb returns for the extension of Harmony Lane north of Indiana? Todd Whipple's fax (dated 21 July 95) indicates that North Idaho Engineers would be responsible for revising the project mylars on file at the County. The County has not received a plan change request for this item to date. 6. Was the sidewalk constructed through the deleted entry of Harmony Lane north of Indiana? 7. MCR elevation indicated at the west quadrant of Harmony /Indiana causes a sump condition at the curb ramp 8. Pond B a. Rim elevation on drywell (28.62) needs to be coordinated with elevation shown on sheet 2S (28.68) b. Drywell at Indiana 5 +60/29.5'LT is more than 8' from the curb line. County Maintenance crews will be able to maintain this drywell 9. Pond C a. Rim elevation (27.78) provides .65' depth over floor elevation (27.13). Test results indicating that the topsoil contains at least the minimum specified organic carbon were not included with this submittal b. Easement dimensions need to shown on the revised detail - 10. Pond M a. Were the floor and rim elevations constructed in accordance with the accepted plans? b. Details (section and elevation views) of the Keystone block wall were not received with submittal. A plan change for this configuration has not been processed through the County Engineer's Office 11. Pond N a. Rim elevation (27.11) provides .66' depth over floor elevation (26.45). Test results indicating that the topsoil contains at least the minimum specified organic carbon were not included with this submittal REVIEW COMMENTS 9 December 96 PROJECT # P1414 - Record Drawings SUBMITTAL # 1 Page 3 of 6 b. Was the invert elevation of the roadside ditch checked? Does it provide at least 6" for water quality treatment before water enters the drywell? c. Was the pipe connecting the drainage structures checked for conformance to the accepted plans? 12. Was the concrete cross - gutter installed at Indiana /McMillan? How can the gutter function as designed if elevation at the middle of the curb return (MCR) (27.60) is so much lower than the flowline of the cross - gutter (27.76)? If the cross - gutter had not been installed at the time the Record Drawings were submitted, it should not be shown as having been installed. 13. The accepted plans indicated that the MCR at the east side of Indiana/McMillan would act as a break line to cause runoff from McMillan to flow south and into Pond N. The Record Drawings indicate that the drywells at the easterly terminus of Indiana will now receive runoff from an area not considered in the original design. Revised drainage calculations for this condition were not received with this submittal 14. Record Drawings for the sprinkler systems required in the swales serving Indiana Avenue were not received with this submittal. Sprinkler system callout is noted at Plan Revision #1 (Jul 95) on the accepted plans. Were the systems installed? 15. Pond D, Pond E: These are located in Riverwalk 2nd Addition, and are identified as Pond "A" and Pond "C" respectively. The Record Drawings (Sheet 5R) for that project state that the sod and irrigation systems for those ponds had not been installed as of 29 Oct 96; the Record Drawings were submitted on 1 Nov 96. The swales, catch basins, drywells and pipes composing these facilities will also need to be completed, and Record Drawings (including the irrigation systems) submitted, prior to the acceptance of Indiana Avenue east of the plat boundary of Riverwalk 1st Addition. Acceptance of any road /drainage improvements in Riverwalk 1st Addition will not include the drywells at Station 11 +54 (LT & RT). The following comments pertain to private roads or facilities serving private roads. The Record Drawings for these improvements will be kept on file at the County as a part of the public record for this project. Since the County does not bear any responsibility or liability in connection with private road and drainage improvements, the Developer is solely responsible for correcting the items noted and revising the Record Drawings, or not. Unless otherwise noted, acceptance of public roads, and drainage facilities serving public roads, will not be dependent upon correction of the following items. Sheet 3: Harmony Lane 1. Entry at west side of Mission Avenue was not constructed in accordance with the accepted plans; this item was identified to IPEC and the Developer in the summer of 1996. A plan change for this condition was not submitted until the Construction Documents were received at the County Engineer's REVIEW COMMENTS 9 December 96 PROJECT # P1414 - Record Drawings SUBMITTAL # 1 Page 4 of 6 Office on 1 Nov 96. Calculations demonstrating how adequate stormwater management will be provided were not received with that plan change request. Preliminary comments on this plan change were provided to IPEC on 2 Dec 96. The plan change must be approved by the County Engineer's Office, and the work completed, prior to the County Engineer's acceptance of Mission Avenue. 2. Pond L: Rim elevation (32.46) provides .66' depth over _floor elevation (31.72). Test results indicating that the topsoil contains at least the minimum specified organic carbon were not included with this submittal 3. Pond K a. There appears to be a 0.2' difference in the floor elevations (plan view vs. details) on the accepted plans. Was the floor elevation on this pond checked? If so, what is the as- constructed floor elevation? The best case results in a 1.9' depth between the rim and pond floor; maximum allowed is .66' (if the topsoil contains the minimum specified amount of organic carbon). b. The drywell at 13 +96.13 is 3' closer to the road than designed. What sort of safety /stability issues does this cause? A type R curb is considered to be a mountable curb, and is not considered to provide adequate protection from damage due to collision with roadside facilities, or due to a vehicle running off the road, as does a type A curb. c. How did the Basin K dimensions change so as to provide only 389 fe for 208 volume? The talcs indicate that these dimensions would provide —1140 ft' for water quality treatment at .5' depth. 4. Pond 1 a. Sheet 9B: The location of the 27.94 elevation is not clear between the plan view and the section view. The section view would indicate that the drywell at 16 +05 is below the pond floor, and that a depth of .5' is not provided between the pond floor (27.94) and the drywell rim at 15 +75 (28.11). b. Rim elevation of drywell at 16 +69 (28.44) provides more that the .66' max. allowed depth over the swale floor (27.41) c. The CL offset of the drywell at 16 +69 needs to be clarified - a 0.74' offset puts the drywell just off the street centerline 5. Were ponds I1, 12 and 13 checked? 6. Pond G: Rim elevation (27.77) provides .67' depth over floor elevation (27.10). Test results indicating that the topsoil contains at least the minimum specified organic carbon were not included with this submittal Sheet 4: Baldwin Lane /Augusta Lane - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County REVIEW COMMENTS 9 December 96 PROJECT # P1414 - Record Drawings SUBMITTAL # 1 Sheet,5: McMillan Lane No comments at this time Page 5 of 6 Sheet 6: Barker Road (14 +50 to 24 +00) - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County Sheet 7: Mission Avenue (10 +00 to 19 +00) - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County Sheet 8: Details - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County Sheet 9: Details - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County Sheet 9A I. Pond H: Rim elevation (27.73) provides .63' depth over floor elevation (27.10). Test results indicating that the topsoil contains at least the minimum specified organic carbon were not included with this submittal 2. Was the invert elevation of the roadside ditch checked? Does it provide at least 6" for water quality treatment before water enters the drywell? If more than 6" depth is provided, does the topsoil contain at least the minimum specified amount of organic carbon? Max. depth is 8" from rim to ditch invert Sheet 9B I. Basin 0: The plans for McMillan Lane indicate that a catch basin and drywell were installed at this pond; this was not indicated on the plans accepted for construction. Detail needs to be coordinated with the plans 2. Was basin P checked? Sheet 9C: Sight Distances - Not received with this submittal; original mylar needs to be returned to the County REVIEW COMMENTS 9 December 96 PROJECT # P1414 - Record Drawings SUBMITTAL # 1 Sheet 1S 1. Concrete core 1-1/8 is not indicated on the map Page 6 of 6 2. The thickness of asphalt core #4 in Table 1 of the report has been coordinated with the data in Gifford's report, per Ed Parry's telephone conversation with Todd Whipple on 4 Dec 96 Sheet 2S 1. Rim elevation for drywell in Pond 13 needs to be coordinated with the elevation shown on Sheet 2 12/10/96 16:06 FAX 206 869 6620 12/05/96 15:07 $5r ^ `243478 FROM P3 Pas 3 I' DEAN /IIOUSLEY LLC COUNTY ENGINEET" FAX 'COVER SHEET Spokane County Engineer's Office - 'Third Floor Fax # 324 -3478 1026 W DROADWAY SPOKANE, WA 99260 - PHONE # (509) 456 -3600 DATE: 5 tali& TO: agfe.Slinet COMPANY: l5 CITY / STATE: NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): MFSSAGF /SPECIAL INSIR(JC ION: Ent &ND Tie7AdENT - Rid&toijk1$ 'sr, 4 FAX #: azj869-14a0 ao-.z tD,, AIN 1 ! t- , 340 �srs 2.d £'o J, ee5 9704.) Pti a P83 4- 2 - 4 7 1001 0001 X. lo 1 vbO 1,.) Hh P'cr U�, CO - pfga4zy ReoucE - Eon( --o 2 57s - - Pce RtNis, 7 s SO 6.1& cerN 'b'scu --ttotga,, N 0 0 PROJECT: BONG ESTIMATE DATE 05- 0ec -96 P1414- Riverwalk 1st Addition estimated by Bond Reduction 42 EJF initial DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PPJCE COST I) DryweII - Type A EA 1 1250.00 1250.00 2) Drywall - Type B EA 5 1650.00 6250.00 3) Grate - Type 1 EA 316.00 0.00 41 Grate Type 2 EA 4 340.00 1360.00 51 Grate - Type 4 EA 3 300,00 900.00 6a) Backfill For DW CY 230 16.00 3680.00 6b) Filter Fabric for OW SY 3400 0.26 850.00 7) Catch Basin EA 4 750.00 3000.00 m 8) Pipe 10" Dle. LF 23.00 0.00 °� 901 Pipe 12" Dia. CMP LF 72 27.00 1944.00 W� 9b) Pipe 12" Va. Ductile Iran LF 60 40.00 2400.00 • 10) Pipe 15' Dia. CMP LF 44 27.80 1223.20 w 11) Pipe 16" Dia. LF 31.50 0.00 12J Precast Manhole EA 1500.00 0.00 g 13) Solid lid EA 3 310.00 930.00 14a) Earthwork - Cut Indiana CY 249 10.00 2490.00 Mission CY 0 10.00 0.00 1401 Earthwork - Fill CY 0 10.00 0.00 CY 0 10.00 0.00 15) Sod SF 0.70 0.00 16) Hydroseed Indiana SF 17581 0.07 1230.67 Mission SF 0 0.07 0.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Wilbert Vault Curb Inlet EA 6 900.00 6400.00 2) 6" underdrain for Keystone Wall - 355 LF • LS 1 7500.00 7500.00 3) Keystone Block Wall - 332 LF LS 1 5000.00 5000.00 4a) irrigation systems - Indiana Ave EA 0 1500.00 0.00 c 40) As -busts for " " • EA 0 250.00 0.00 IC 5a) Irrigation systems - Misson Ave EA 0 1500.00 0.00 401 As- bullts for" EA 0 250.00 0.00 1 t m 0 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 47407.87 N r �- c c c °o rc 0 c N fY i DATE 05- Dec -96 c c to Phase 2 to Phase I Surety adjustment for Phase 1 ....._ .... ......... °. - • ^--- -----'---... °-- •• - --- -- punchIls 1 adjusted QUANTITY PRICE COST UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST bond amount 1250,00 0.00 EA 1 1260.00 1260.00 200 1050.00 2 1560.00 3120.00 EA 3 1560.00 4680.00 750 3930.00 315.00 0.00 EA 315.00 0.00 0.00 2 340.00 680.00 EA 2 340.00 680.00 680.00 300.00 0.00 EA 3 300.00 800.00 900.00 BO 16.00 1280.00 CY 150 18.00 2400.00 2400.00 1200 0.25 300.00. SY 2200 0.26 550.00 550.00 2 750.00 1500.00 EA 2 760.00 1500.00 1500.00 23.00 0.00 LF 23.00 0.00 0.00 44.00 27.70 1218.80 LF 46.00 27.70 1246.50 1246.50 40.00 0.00 LF 60 40.00 2400.00 2400.00 44 27.80 1223.20 LF 27.80 0.00 0.00 31.50 0.00 LF 31.50 0.00 0.00 1600.00 0.00 EA 1500.00 0.00 0.00 2 310.00 620.00 EA 1 310.00 310.00 310.00 151 10.00 1610.00 CY 99 10.00 990.00 990.00 10.00 0.00 CY 26.1 10,00 261.00 261.00 0 10.00 0.00 CY 0 10.00 0.00 0.00 0 10.00 0.00 CY 0 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.00 SF 0.70 0.00 0.00 10100 0.07 707.00 SF 7481 0.07 523.87 523.57 0.07 0,00 SF 1316 0.07 92.12 92.12 12159.00 900.00 0.00 EA 5 900.00 4500.00 4500.00 7600.00 0.00 LS 1 7500.00 7500.00 7500,00 5000.00 0.00 LS 1 5000.00 5000.00 5000.00 2 1600.00 3000.00 EA 3 1500.00 4500.00 4500.00 go oo 2 250,00 500.00 EA 3 260.00 750,00 750.00 b 1600.00 0.00 EA 1 1500.00 1500.00 1500.00 " 250.00 0.00 EA 1 250.00 260.00 250.00 15659.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 41733.29 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL r 0 c N c CC 0 x v c c % retained Total to Final Imp Retained 20.00% 210,00 20.0046 786.00 0.00 20.00% 136.00 20.00% 180.00 20.00% 480.00 20.00% 110.00 20.00% 300.00 0.00 w 20.00% 249.30 f ig 20.00% 410.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00% 62.00 $ 20.03% 198.00 100.00% 261.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.0096 78.55 ao 100.0056 92.12 1 3622.97 0 15.0036 676.00 20.00% 1500.00 20.00% 1000.00 00.00% 4600.00 CO 100.00% 750,00 vi 100.0096 1500.00 100.00% 250.00 co 17420.94 ti 0 C 0 16) Monuments EA 6 185.00 1110.00 17) Barricade LF 0 33.00 0.00 18) Street Signs EA 3 85.00 255.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL 1365.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK "Indiana Ave di Mission Ave 19) Rough Grade CY 2668,7 10.00 26687.00 20) Top Course CY 1019.4 16.00 16310.40 21) Base Course CY 16.00 0.00 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 1070.3 44.40 47521.32 23) Curb Type A LF 7.00 0.00 24) Curb Type 6 LF 2557.8 8.00 20462.40 25) Curb Type R LF 8.00 0.00 261 Sidewalk SG YD 1705.2 16.70 28478.84 "Mission Ave 191 Rough Grade CY 10.00 0.00 20) Tap Course CY 18.00 0.00 21) Base Course CY 16.00 0.00 22) Asphalt Concrete Torts 44.40 0.00 23) Curb Type A LF 7.00 0.00 241 Curb Type 6 LF 8,00 0.00 251 Curb Type R LF 8,00 0.00 261 Sidewalk SO YD 16.70 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING 139457.96 GRAND TOTAL 1813,230.83 Required Surety 188,300.00 Previlous reduction 111,600.00 o Cuurent Surety 76,700.00 c 0 N c ) P. CC a c as N 0 - c c N to 186.00 0.00 EA 6 185.00 1110,00 1110.00 r9 33,00 0.00 LF 0 33.00 0.00 0 85.00 0.00 EA 3 85.00 255.00 255.00 Add lo Phase 2 Surely 15.659.00 0.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL 1365.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL c c Indiana Ave 10.00 0.00 CY 2519.7 10.00 25197.00 16.00 0.00 CV 944.9 16.00 16118.40 16.00 0.00 CY 18.00 0.00 44.40 0.00 Tons 968.5 44.40 43001.40 7.00 0.00 LF 7.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 LF 2400.3 8.00 19202.40 8.00 0.00 LF 8.00 0,00 16.70 0.00 . SO YO 1600.2 16.70 26723.34 GRANO TOTAL 182,606.25 • 6000.00 4000.00 Mission Ave 10,00 0.00 CY 149 10.00 1490.00 1490.00 16.00 0.00 CY 74.5 16.00 1192.00 1192.00 16.00 0.00 CY 16.00 0.00 0.00 44.40 0.00 Tons 101.6 44.40 4519.92 4519.92 7.00 0.00 LF 7.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 LE 157.5 8.00 1260.00 1280.00 8.00. 1 0.00 LF 6.00 0.00 0.00 16.70 0.00 SO YD 105 16.70 1763.50 1753.60 u r n 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING 139467.96 130457.96 r PunchBel Orywelts Cross - gutter c Sidewalk Retur n Total Surely necessary to Currant Surety co Surety to be released La 0 26197.00 15118.40 0.00 38001.40 0.00 15202.40 0.00 26723.34 130,457.96 ffi c c c c 100.00% 1110.00 ®° 0,00% 0.00 100.00% 255.00 N Reta:nage Phase 1 1365.00 10.00% 2519.70 10.00% 1511.64 0.00 10.00% 3600.14 I 0.00 10.00% 1520.24 0.00 10.00% 2672.33 100.00% 1490.00 100.00% 1192.00 0.00 100.00% 4619.92 0.00 100.00% 1260.00 0.00 100.00% 1763,50 22239.67 41,025.62 950.00 6000.00 4000.00 9950.00 -1 50976.62 m 75700.00 co 25724,39 TUt Project Amount Riverwalk 1st Construction - Indiana $3,485.85 Riverwalk 2nd $222.50 Riverwalk 3rd $222.50 Pump Station $4,151.50 Expenses (Reproduction) $250.95 Totals $8,333.30 Via Facsimile (one) Page Total December 5, 1996 W.O. No.96106 Dean - Housley Company 16720 NE 116th Street Redmond, WA 98052 Attn: Mark Hancock Re: Riverwalk, 1st Construction, Billing Clarification Dear Mark: Per your request regarding our Invoice No. 18036 dated October 31, 1996 the following breakout should suffice for your purposes. Please call with any questions. Sincerely, Inl Pacifi odd R. Whipple, P.E. neering Co., Inc. TRW /tw Enclosure (billing dated 10/31/96) cc: file 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509 -458 -6840 • FAX:509- 458 -6844 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208 -769 -7277 DEAN HOUSLEY COMPANY 16720 NE 116TH STREET REDMOND WA 98052 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 W 7TH SUITE 200 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99204 458 -6840 FAX 458 -6844 OCTOBER 31, 1996 RIVERWALK 1ST CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION JOB #: 96106 BASIC SERVICES SUBTOTAL: DIRECT EXPENSES REPRODUCTION /MILEAGE /PHOTOS Invoice #18036 * PROJECT ADMINISTRATION & COORDINATION * PUMP STATION DOCUMENTATION & RECORD DRAWINGS * 1ST, 2ND, 3RD DOCUMENTATION & RECORD DRAWINGS * SUPPLEMENTAL CALCULATIONS * POND ASBUILT SURVEYS & COORDINATION WITH LOCAL REPRESENTATIVE c I OC,* ( Amount • - PROVIDED CONSTRUCTION CERTTFICATION SERVICES 8,082.35 INCLUDING: 8,082.35 250.95 SUBTOTAL: 250.95 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED $8,333.30 INTEREST ON OVERDUE BALANCE $212.02 TOTAL AMOUNT OF THIS BILL $8,545.32 1Z/U4/9U 12:41 FAA 2U6 Cue UUZU • • December 4, 1996 Total Pages: _3_ TO: Ed Parry @ Spokane County Engineers FROM: Mark Hancock @ Dean Housley RE: Indiana Avenue Cross Gutter, Riverwalk Ed - Per our phone conversation this morning, here are the IPE cross gutter plans that we propose to construct for the cross gutter on Indiana Avenue at McMillan Lane in Riverwalk. They are drawn to reflect asbuilt conditions around the gutter as opposed to the original schematic NIE drawings. As part of the cleanup of Riverwalk, we had released the field to begin the work as soon as weather permits, so please let us know right away if you have any questions or problems. Thanks a lot for your help, cc: Todd Whipple Verne Jacobsen "4- Uli.4N /IIUUSLLY LLU 4UUU1 FAX MEMO PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER EXISTNG CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER EXISTING GUTTE ELEVATION DETAIL 1 PROPOSED CUTTER ELEV. N.TS ASPHALT AVEMENT d Description Purpose Information Written Approval Remarks Signed cc: irr INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -6844 TO: C,,_ C�. ykei • ATTENTION: 1 L DATE: 174 it 1 L I.P.E. PROJECT #• q &to(p P15T N": cool Xerox Prints D Copy of Letter Original Drawing D Contract Documents D D Work Authorization D Report D No. Copies Description ed.- Y- ?if rew -rbvt (_J kaLoa-7 Pak,- er Your Request D Review & Comments C Signature & Return &Axe s -4/e_ fv /1 - s - liee -/ s7ior) c-� kjc,c) - h &ice t` K- 7011c.4.- _ D \TINSMT.PMS TO: No. Copies 1- Signed cc: M RF � INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458154V 1 4 1996 ATTENTION: a Rot,(/ Description E? Xerox Prints C] Original Drawing C] Work Authorization c rUZI2AD vf. Copy of Letter El Contract Documents L] Report Description Let P LA.\ ( . Att il_yhM& 2.PCC-0 : gala shad be 'r�^"' ao dose !vi Nair A ,p rfr4 44 ea ecto Purpoz O Infor. 0 Writte Remarks a- a'. h p - kw4o2 finek di; atm U - comments Sure & Return DATE: I.P.E. PROJECT #• PROJECT NAME !l /4 X1,6 Bit/OA/Act a a A tt- i =Per Your Request 0 64 iv S Curio l' otP,u,u-1, A 4 1 410 ifsel t i G_: c' 1Z( iu4 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER D ■TANSMT M5 TOTAL P.01 JOB SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE UTILITY ESMT.) (OLD RIGHT OF WAY) LOT 13, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1 ST ADDITION X1' • (SOUTH SIDE OF EXIST. HOUSE) (NEW RIGHT OF WAY) MISSION AVENUE 5' 14' (FACE OF CURB (TO FENCE) RIVERWALK 7TH ADDITION 1 DATE: 1.1/14/96 1 LxPIRE ) I November 8, 1996 W.O. No. 96106 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Spokane County Public Works W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Attn: Ed Parry, P.E Re: Riverwalk 1st Addition Mission Avenue, Post Construction Design Deviation Dear Ed: It is my understanding that you have had several conversations with Mark Hancock regarding the right -of -way and easement situation on Mission Avenue between Stations 15 +00 and 16 +00 along Lot 13, Block 1 at Riverwalk lst Addition (RW1). Mark Hancock, with the Dean Housley Company, has indicated to me that he has discussed with both you and Dave Berto that the recorded plat is actually missing 10 -feet of slope, sidewalk and drainage easement area from that shown on the approved plans and referenced in the recorded plat. We believe that this has resulted from a misunderstanding of the difference between the easement and it's relationship to the future acquisition area. It appears that the 25 -foot slope; drainage, sidewalk and utility easement has included the 10 -foot future acquisition area within it. Based upon our review and our work on Riverwalk 7th addition it is apparent that these two should have remained separate and distinct. THEREFORE, THIS DESIGN DEVIATION PROPOSES A REVISION TO THE MISSION AVENUE APPROVED CROSS SECTION TO ONLY ALLOW A 15 -FOOT SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ADJACENT TO THE 10 -FOOT FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA. THIS WOULD DEVIATE FROM THE APPROVED 25 -FOOT EASEMENT CALLED OUT ON THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPOKANE COUNTY SPECIAL SECTION. Included with this submittal are the following 1. A copy from the recorded plat map showing the existing 20 -foot ROW, the new dedicated 10 -feet of ROW, a 10 -foot future acquisition area and a 25 -foot sidewalk, slope, drainage and utility easement. Please note that on the plat this 25 foot easement is shown inaccurately as the 1O foot future acquisition area has been made part of this 25 foot easement rather than keeping them separate. This is where the discrepancy has occurred. 2. A copy of the Approved plan sheet of Mission Avenue within this area. 3. A copy of the Approved plan sheet of the special Mission Avenue section. 4. An exhibit showing how the house and fence were actually constructed on lot 13 block 1 of RWl. Spokane County November 8, 1996 Page 2 We would like for you to note, that IPEC was not the design engineer or the surveyor of record on either the plat or the approved plan set. The engineer and surveyor of record was North Idaho Engineering. We are only providing this design deviation as a service to the Dean Housley Co. Secondly, the house on Lot 13, is now sold and occupied so that there is no longer an option to revise the plat without making this lot unusable as the house would be within the 25 -foot easement. Lastly, a site visit has revealed that the sidewalk was constructed at the back of curb and will be removed and placed as far onto the lot as possible to be outside of the future acquisition area. Please see enclosed lot exhibit for proposed location. As usual your prompt attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated. Should you have any questions regarding this issue please feel free to call at 458 -6840. Sincerely, Inland Pacific F,ggineering Co., dd R. Whipple, P TRW /tw cc: Dean- Ilousley, Mark Hancock file ?ROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION DATE NOVEMBER 8, 1996 ROAD NAME MISSION AVENUE CRP/RID # N/A NAME OF PLAT RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION Plat # PE- 1414 -8I/9` ADDRESS OF BLDG N/A NAME OF BLDG PROJECT N /lam BLDG# B9 N/A S T .2,21R41 FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT N N/A PROJECT LIMITS JUSTIFICATION: • t • REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION $30.00 EXISTING CONDITIONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: ROAD WIDTH 24 40 ROAD SURFACE ACP ACP AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC 2400 ADT 3120 ADT Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count PROJECT DESCRIPTION SEE ATTACHED LETTER SEE ATTACHED LETTER SEE ATTACHED LETTER SUBMITTED BY TODD WHIPPLE, P.E., INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. DATE NOVEMBER 8, 1996 ADDRESS 707 WEST 7TH AVENUE, SUITE 200, SPOKANE, WA ZIP CODE 99204 PHONE N (S091 458 -6840 ADMIMS IRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF S30 00 PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY * * * * * ** 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260 -0170 PHONE (509)456 -3600 FAX (509)324 -3478 - REQUEST WILL NOT nE REVIEWED WITHOUT FUNDS- CASH /CHECK 11 RECEIVED BY - DATE INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. .Y 'THE IDER OF INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. 707 W. 7TH AVE., SUITE 200 SPOKANE, WA 99204 (509) 458 -6840 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS THIRTY AND NO n'0 L L86 Le 1: L 2 5 L000a DATE 100 9764L I, 3" R SECURITY FEATURES INCLUDED. DE TARS ON BACK. o WASHINGTON TRUST.BANK SPOKANE, WA 99210 -2127 28-8/1251 0582701 CONTROL NO. AMOUNT 11 -8 -96 $30_00 DOLLARS INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. GENERAL ACCOUNT 11861 YOUR INVOICE NO INVOICE GATE INVOICE AMOUNT AMOUNT PAID DISCOUNT TAKEN �O — �� " ()coo-41/4 p/i / Yr <� ,1 or\- ,4ve- u c &e k id/fr t t- / sf- 6 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. .Y 'THE IDER OF INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. 707 W. 7TH AVE., SUITE 200 SPOKANE, WA 99204 (509) 458 -6840 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS THIRTY AND NO n'0 L L86 Le 1: L 2 5 L000a DATE 100 9764L I, 3" R SECURITY FEATURES INCLUDED. DE TARS ON BACK. o WASHINGTON TRUST.BANK SPOKANE, WA 99210 -2127 28-8/1251 0582701 CONTROL NO. AMOUNT 11 -8 -96 $30_00 DOLLARS INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. GENERAL ACCOUNT 11861 (U LJ J 23 10 U C] Lf] 1F) 0 c j O 1 C') 0 0 Z Ix CL` W CC 18)17 /- FPuNB i /2' REBak / './ PLASTIC CAP PL S 422121 UNPLATTED NOT A PART N89•56•50'v N89'56'50'1./ 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE. AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) 25' SIDEWALK, SLOPE. DRAINAGE - AND UTILITY EASEMENT EASEMENT FOR CLEAR '/IEv TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL '9' U i0' fli T'URE ACOUISiTION AREA N� SPOKANE CDUNIY BRASS CAP AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD 02455 RP'E PER COUNTY RECORD 552.80' -f 627.62' r, • Zu :o,l.1D 6r S89'54'16'E 103.63' ▪ r S d 0 7 a 6,736 SF' N89'54'16'VI I 10363' vi 6,76 SF v S89'54'16'E a • 103.63' N 9 r ; o N89' 54'16'' e q 6,736 SF °'j 133.63' 10 I2 6,736 SF j 594�+i6'E T O O 6,736 SF •9 w MISSION AVENUE oPX f'" 100.00' �^ O CC 11•139•59'58"4 • .o 9 4'16 12 3 m 6,736 SF 589 T6'E 13 d n 9.391 SF W L23ti L 9 0 .0 • adindineint v • N 25' - W 6,41 SF i rg N en n2' e L2 N o a AUGUSTA LANE N N k ' i 6.741 SF 0o Iele'S9'S9• z 1 70.00' 1 . 25' 0 .g. oo■ 1 6,737 SF Le4'_B L7 -J J tn m W 0 ra 0 0 0 0 z S 89'56'44' E 2615.78' CRL1) N 89'56'50' V 26I5.78' (M) 'DRAMA._ _ASEMEN 1988.16' SEE SHEET 4 Drown BY %IC (4P. 08/9+ Oeklgned NEE E.J.P. OB /04 Chocked 8y, I SCALE NratIZOHTAL: NONE VERTICAL: 'tour. OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER W. ICBM BROADWAY AVE. SPCKA NE. WA. 9924 D -0170 AS0 -3600 APPROVED: CCLINTY ENGINEER Dcie: i.. _ 1 It MISSION AVENUE EAST OF BARKER ROAD TYPiCAL ROADWAY SECTION SHEET ! of 1 XSEC0045,DWG MIS3.104 AYENVE (sw.) cti • 1r TRAF(.0 IX TRAtnt N W R(4 r • D AIMAC AND 9O ALIE EASEMENT IDe TREATTENT AND SNOW STORAGE 1171 AI KETLIC —ACP Cl. A' i (mkt) I----AG CI. E' TOTAL Ac? DEPTH TO EA 3 R -VALUE TESTIHC FUTURE , , ACCE TSMON TYPE 'D CURS tN am IAIPRYT i—T /C + DY N NHUM HATER DEPTH (CR 2C0 10.4' NINNLM DEPTH (Oft SfOI N POLUNE . WATER SUR(ACE ELEVABGN 1 COPS NOI ENCROACH ON MAAS ktousInoN MCA ®M uaw 12' 12' TRAFFIC 20' 30' EXIST. PAVEMENT EXIST. TRAFFIC R/W 12' 4' .0200 FT /FT MIN 5" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% T0.6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. BIKE LANE MODIFIED MISSION AVENUE CROSS SECTION STA. 14 +98.96 TO STA. 15 +90.08 RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION PROP. R/W (NOT TO SCALE) EXIST. 4" COMPACTED CLASS "A' ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 6" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. 55' 25' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE AND SLOPE EASEMENT 10' FUTURE ACQUISITION TYPE "B" CURB MISSION AVENUE '208' TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION 15' 6' SIDEWALK 2% MIN rn r �•C INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458 -6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FM: (509) 458 -6844 12' TRAFFIC 30' 12' TRAFFIC EXIST. EXIST. E.O.P. R/W 121 14' TRAFFIC 55' .0200 FT /F7' MIN 5" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE CO NTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 7" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. (FORMER 10' FUTURE ACQUISITION) PROP. 15' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE R/W AND SLOPE EASEMENT '208' TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE 4 b 8' TYPE "B" CURB 6' SIDEWALK 2% MIN TYPICAL CROSS- SECTIO1 (NOT TO SCALE) r r EXIST. 4" COMPACTED CLASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETE 7 t COMPACTED CRUSHED SUURFACING % BASE H COU SE 6" MISSION AVENUE "°z ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. MODIFIED MISSION AVENUE CROSS SECTION STA. 14 +98.96 TO STA. 15 +90.08 LT. RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION INLAND IC PACIFIC ENGINEERING [ 707 We5t 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 . (509) 458 -6840 FAX: (509) 458 -6844 ...._sort (SIDEWALK. SLOPE DRAINAGE UTILITY ESMT.) (OLD RIGHT OF WAY) ° LOT 13, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1 ST ADDITION (SOUTH SIDE OF EXIST. HOUSE) (FACE OF CURB (TO FENCE) (NEW RIGHT OF WAY) MISSION AVENUE 5 / / -87 Lia z. 14' }. 0 T. NSTALL WHEELCHAIR RAMP RIVERWALK 7TH ADDITION 1 DATE: - (1/14 96 P4-1-7 e (P• u/ fdvt (- zoc /c- deAria -4-k' gif t / si_77./ & 8 3t) 4 u,.. y (z7 /q b. O !/Lichijt wie i ttl Ed vvtcd ha)) 0,41. /coked E v K1dvl - Wor ic :0-GI i I J74 vd.t ro- o? s • 4n5 - Pf nS Pty -hie rV4Ifr-(A) / / /2o' /9a 7Rw D 0 /Md-v/L refut- a Ind f ec ve - k.— fn to D Itn.rlidMd Ave.., D in- cowl �?e � Cp Pvvtc! wl Xid dus 4 revItcl pOIAA C DEA N HOUSLEY COMPANY. November 25. 1996 ivlr. William A. Johns P E County Engineer Spokane County 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 RE: Setaside funds. 1st Addition, Riverwalk Dear Mr. Johns, It is our understanding_ that we need to request in writing a bond reduction or setaside of funds release for work in Spokane County. Specifically, with the submittal of the Inland Pacific asbuilts and test results for the work in the First Addition at Rivenvalk on November 1, we are hereby writing to request that the current setaside of funds in the amount of 376,700 for the First Addition roads and storm be released. Given the period of time the work has been in place and the thorough testing performed by IPE, we trust that this would be satisfactory. If there is a reason to continue a setaside or bond, we would request a bond in the amount of 5% of the work, which we believe would be for 3 9,350.00. We would greatly appreciate a waiver or reduction at your earliest convenience, and please call me at 206/869 -6618, ext. 234, if you have any questions or if I can be of assistance. Thank you very much for your help. Sincerely, cc: Ed Parry Dave Berto Mark B. Hancock Land Development Manager Cc ; C� — TaPv li-)H• PoLc 16720 N.E. 116th Street • Redmond, Washington • 98052 • 206.869.6618 • Fax 206.869.6620 DEDICATED TO BUILDING QUALITY HOMES AND .COMMUNITIE TO: cc: ATTENTION: a Poop. J Description Purpose Information Q Written Approval Remarks a:y i 4he., kw ire INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458 -6840 Fax: (509)458 -6844 I - f Xerox Prints C Copy of Letter Original Drawing 0 Contract Documents O Work Authorization n Report 0 No. Copies Description - Li3f PLAL3 LOT i3 rot_ 1 0 Review & Comments D Signature & Return &d tte saki .- -I &4 ) ,c um /Ius+E DATE I.P.E. PROJECT #: PROJECT NAM E: 11 -/4 q 1 L io(6 I 1 IIIF Z A- -V_ a Your Request c.te Signed D \TRNSMT.PM5 S OT 13, BLOCK 1 RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION (SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE UTILITY ESMT.) (OLD RIGHT OF WAY) a (SOUTH SIDE OF EXIST. HOUSE) (NEW RIGHT OF WAY) MISSION AVENUE 14' FACE OF CURB (TO FENCE) 1 r 1 ! 1 9 ' • _ # • I I ' S ! DATE: 11 /14/96 EXPIRES ! J ( INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. November I, 1996 W.O. No. 96106 CA .0) Spokane County Public Works Engineering Division W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Attn: Bill Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Re: Riverwalk 1st Addition - Construction/Record Drawing information for Indiana Avenue Dear Bill: As you know earlier this year we were retained by the Dean - Housley Group to assist them in providing some kind of a construction record for determining the suitability of the construction of the public roads within this plat. Although, there were two separate public roads constructed as a part of this plat we are at this time onfy submitting information relating directly to Indiana Avenue. This is per our conversations to do so and per several letters and memorandums which you have forwarded concerning this portion of the project. We are intending to follow up with the small portion of Mission Avenue after this portion of Indiana Avenue has been submitted. Additionally, as has been pointed out, the other projects directly affected by Indiana Avenue such as Riverwalk 2nd and 3rd will have complete submittal packages submitted in accordance with he 1995 SCRS and as required by the County Engineer. As of this writing, both sets of Record Drawings for Riverwalk 2nd and 3rd Additoins are being submitted concurrently. As you know, there were several meetings held prior to the construction of both Indiana Avenue and Mission Avenue and the result of these meetings was that the County allowed the Dean - Housley Group (DHG) to proceed with a final grading and strip paving operation for the 1995 home show that was coming up. Rather than just providing a strip paving and finishing the roadway up after the plans had been approved by the County, DHG and their contractor constructed as complete the entirety of Indiana and Mission Avenues without the presence of a County inspector. Therefore, DHG through IPEC now finds ourselves in the position of investigating and reporting back with record drawings and testing statistics the results of the in place constructed elements. Per discussions with yourself at the County and as part of this submittal we have evaluated three basic constructed elements. These elements are as follows: 1. Paving on Indiana Avenue, including the paving depths, compaction requirements and subgrade thickness. Cement concrete work on sidewalks and curbs, including depths and ultimate strength. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509458.6840 • FAX: 509 -458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Dive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, 1) 83814 208- 765 -7784 • FAX; 208-769-7277 To I r ��1 AL✓II }t-r1 {'r kArn From, 1 al l-- Co. /DePt D9/MJ - S I CS; - ca k -_-- C� Phone R n �/ . m _t - c, CJ Phorre - fi b November 1, 1996 W.O. No. 96106 EA Spokane County Public Works Engineering Division W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Attn: Bill Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Dear Bill: 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509 - 458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458 -6844 ir INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Post -it° Fax Note 7671 Date, /-, I / a of Re: Riverwalk 1st Addition - Construction/Record Drawing information for Indiana Avenue As you know earlier this year we were retained by the Dean - Housley Group to assist them in providing some kind of a construction record for determining the suitability of the construction of the public roads within this plat. Although, there were two separate public roads constructed as a part of this plat we are at this time miry submitting information relating directly to Indiana Avenue. This is per our conversations to do so and per several letters and memorandums which you have forwarded concerning this portion of the project. We are intending to follow up with the small portion of Mission Avenue after this portion of Indiana Avenue has been submitted. Additionally, as has been pointed out, the other projects directly affected by Indiana Avenue such as Riverwalk 2nd and 3rd will have complete submittal packages submitted in accordance with he 1995 SCRS and as required by the County Engineer. As of this writing, both sets of Record Drawings for Riverwalk 2nd and 3rd Additoins are being submitted concurrently. As you know; there were several meetings held prior to the construction of both Indiana Avenue and Mission Avenue and the result of these meetings was that the County allowed the Dean - Housley Group (DHG) to proceed with a final grading and strip paving operation for the 1995 home show that was coming up. Rather than just providing a strip paving and finishing the roadway up after the plans had been approved by the County, DHG and their contractor constructed as complete the entirety of Indiana and Mission Avenues without the presence of a County inspector. Therefore, DHG through IPEC now finds ourselves in the position of investigating and reporting back with record drawings and testing statistics the results of the in place constructed elements. Per discussions with yourself at the County and as part of this submittal we have evaluated three basic constructed elements. These elements are as follows: 1. Paving on Indiana Avenue, including the paving depths, compaction requirements and subgrade thickness. 2. Cement concrete work on sidewalks and curbs, including depths and ultimate strength. 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 Spokane County November 1, 1996 Page 2 3. Drainage elements regarding the as designed versus the as constructed elements including pond bottom areas, pond volumes and pipe or ditch flow characteristics. 1. Paving on Indiana Avenue The paving on Indiana and Mission Avenues was placed sometime between July and June of 1995. In- July -, 1996 des tructive - testing investigations were undertaken by Gifford Consultants Incorporated (GCI) at the request of Inland Pacific Engineering Co., Inc. (IPEC) on behalf of DHG. The plan for testing was reviewed with Bill Johns at the County and was determined to be appropriate for the level of analysis which the County required to ultimately accept the roadway paving job performed. The subgrade preparation and the pavement placement were performed by Inland Asphalt Paving Co., Inc.. The program of analysis for the testing of the asphalt was to take several corings at the Locations delineated on the enclosed map within the Asphalt & Concrete Testing appendix section of this letter. The coring locations have also been delineated on the supplemental mylar sheet concerning Indiana Avenue. These coring were obtained either by IPEC, GCI or Spokane Concrete Coring. The cores were measured for thickness and then were analyzed for density by the bulk specific gravity method. The following table outlines the results of the coring and density testing obtained. Table No. 1 - Asphalt Testing lridiana Avenue St 0+00 to 11+62:66±-:an .Mission Avenue;Sta 15 +00 to 16. +75t,. Core ;,Number' Bulk Specific <:;Gravity ' i ensity In Place Calculated . %Density" 1 B 2 B 3 4 5 6 7 8 Avg 2.37 2.21 2.32 2.32 2.33 2.37 2.29 2.35 2.32 147.9 137.9 144.8 144.8 145.4 147.9 142.9 146.6 144.775 3.4 3.4 3.2 3.2 2.8 3.0 2.8 3.4 3.15 96.2 89.7 - 94.2 94.2 94.5 96.2 92.9 95.3 94.15 • - Based upon a rice density of 153 • - Cores No. 1 and 2 were taken on Mission Avenue and will be addressed at a later time. Item No Dated ; Content - Summary- r 1 6/6/95 Documents a canceled curb pour 2 6/7/95 Concrete curb pour on the N. Side of Indiana, report notes Spokane County also on site taking cylinders. 3 6/8/95 Picked up cylinders taken the previous day, these were supplemental to the ones the County took. 4 6/8/95 Testing report documenting strength of the cores picked up. 5 6/16/95 Paving on Indiana, with temperature tests. 6 7/21/95 Grading on the I.90 EB Off Ramp. 7 7/24/95 Grading and Paving on the I -90 EB Off Ramp. 8 7/24/95 Density Testing for I -90 EB Off Ramp paving. 9 7/24/96 Proctor Results 10 6/16/95 Inland Asphalt Paving Density Tests for Indiana Avenue 11 6/16/95 Inland Asphalt Paving Density Tests for Indiana Avenue 12 6/16/95 Inland Asphalt Paving Density Tests for Indiana Avenue Howard Consultants Inc., (STRATA) 2 - HCI Daily Field Reports Spokane County November 1, 1996 Page 3 As can be seen from Table No. 1, the destructive asphalt testing measurements for Indiana and have resulted in calculated densities for the most part greater than the require 91 percent as outlined in the WSDOT /APWA Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. Due to the destructive nature of the tests, tests on the subgrade were waived by the County as no reasonable means for testing could be determined without disturbing the subgrade prior to testing. Based upon the specific bulk method used with the Rice number of 153.8 as shown on the Inland Asphalt Paving testing forms all Cores 1 and 3 through 8 meet the WSDOT requirements. Core, No. 2, taken near the gutter on Mission Avenue was the only core to not meet the compaction guidelines. Therefore, Cores No. 3 through 8 which represent only Indiana Avenue should be considered acceptable. In addition to the core samples taken, several inspectors reports and testing analysis were obtained from Inland Pavings own records and also some subgrade reports from Howard Consultants Inc., (Strata) were obtained and are also included within the appendix of this document. A list of these reports and a summary of their content follows. Spokane County November 1, 1996 Page 4 2. Cement Concrete Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter on Indiana Avenue The sidewalk, curb and_gutter. _was ..placed ..on. Indiana. and.Mission.sometime_prior_tQlune 1995. In July, 1996 destructive testing investigations were undertaken by Gifford Consultants Incorporated (GCI) at the request of Inland Pacific Engineering Co., Inc. (IPEC) on behalf of DHG. The plan for testing was reviewed with Bill Johns at the County and was determined to be appropriate for the level of analysis which the County required to ultimately accept the cement concrete work for both Indiana and Mission Avenues. Rough grading for sidewalks and roadways was provided by KC Construction. The subgrade preparation and rock placement for both pavement and curbs was performed by Inland Asphalt Paving Co., Inc.. The program of analysis for the testing of the cement concrete work was to take numerous corings at the locations delineated on the map within the Asphalt and Concrete Testing appendix section of this report. The coring locations have also been delineated on the supplemental mylar sheet concerning Indiana Avenue. These corings were obtained either by IPEC, GCI or Spokane Concrete Coring. The cores were measured for thickness and ultimately broken to determine ultimate compressive strength as the 28-day maximum strength dates had long passed when the corings were obtained. The following table outlines the results of the coring and density testing obtained. Table No. 4 - Cement Concrete Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Testing diana Avenue Sta 0 +00 to. 11 +66 2± and& . Mrsssion Avenue Sta15 +.00 to.16 +75± Sidewalk °. Cores Number:' ..Thickneist. (in) Tested. Strength- j; Gutter Cores;: Core. °Number Thickness (in) Test =S A B B B C D E F G H I J K 3.6 3.8 2.4 3.3 3.9 3.4 3.2 3.4 4.2 4.0 2.7 A A A 5488 A A A 4543 5072 A 1 B 2B 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 5.2 5.4 5.3 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.6 5.5 4.3 5.9 5.5 7343 7410 7802 7810 9044 8406 7351 8060 8630 6862 7258 Spokane County November 1, 1996 Page 5 diana Avenue Sta 0;t=00 to 11 +66 2tan�' MrssionAvenue Sta 15 +00 to ?16 +75± .Y . Sidewalk ' Thickness Tested Strength Gutter Cores ' Core, Number Thickness yf Tested.Strength L M N 0 P Q R 4.6 4.0 4.5 3.3 3.6 5.3 3.4 6288 5975 4780 A 5845 A 12 13 41 15 16 17 18 5.0 4.8 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 8077 8110 7445 8680 7934 8201 8391 Avg 3.7 5427 I Avg 5.14 7934 A - After trimming the cores depth to radius ratios were adequate for breakage and strength testing. e - Cores A, B, 1 and 2 were taken on Mission Avenue and will be addressed at a later time. Below is an overall analysis, with any recommended or implemented mitigation. Sidewalk Core Depth - Generally, the depths were fairly close to 4.0- inches with the notable exceptions of Point C @ 2.4" and Point K @ 2.7 ". These two section were removed and repoured within the last several weeks to a depth of 4.0 ". No other sections were removed or replaced. Sidewalk Strength - All cores that could be tested were acceptable for sidewalk strength per County requirements. Gutter Core Depth - Generally, all depths were substandard at 5.0" well below the County requirements of 6.0 ". No remediation was recommended or under taken as a result of this testingprogram for this significant deficiencey. Gutter Strength - All cores that could be tested were acceptable for sidewalk strength per County requirements. Spokane County November 1, 1996 Page 6 3. Drainage Elements As with this report this section deals only with the drainage elements directly related to Indiana Avenue. We will provide additional Mission Avenue data after approval of the Design Deviation submitted 11/1/96. For the most part the plans substantially conform to the designs approved. In order to better delineate from the North Idaho Engineering (NIE) prepared mylars we have prepared several supplemental sheets which revise the pond dimensions and volumes. All required volumes are those volumes required for the 10 -year storm as identified within the NIE approved drainage reports for Riverwalk 1st Addition. However, there are several points that need to be brought out where supplemental calculations or additional discussions were required for verification due to construction variances from the approved plans. Indiana Avenue approx. Sta 1 +30 A pipe installed within this reach was installed to the wrong invert in Pond A. This resulted in the pipe being buried up to 6- inches in the pond. The efficiency of the pipe has been modeled to determine if the pipe flows approximately half full will this carry the calculated storm volume, which it will. These calculations are enclosed. Additionally, an approximate 8 -foot sump was created around the outfall of this pipe to minimize the'actual filling with sediment of this pipe, this sump will minimally increase the depth of storage within this area and will not affect the functioning of the overall 208 pond. Indiana Avenue and McMillan Lane At the present time the cross -gutter has not been constructed. The main reason that this cross - gutter had not been constructed is that it could not be constructed as originally designed and approved by Spokane County. We have since provided DHG with a design which will work and expect in the very near future that this cross gutter will be installed to meet the overall drainage assumptions not only for this plat but for Riverwalk 2nd Addition. Pond M. at Indiana Avenue and McMillan Lane Currently this pond as constructed is outside the easement shown on the plat of record. However, a new easement has been submitted to Spokane County for approval and filing. The reconfiguration of the pond was due to placement of utilities such as power vaults in the corner behind the sidewalk and wheel chair ramp to maintain pond volume. Spokane County November 1, 1996 Page 7 Included with this submittal are two bond copies of the record drawings for Indiana Avenue as well as supplemental drainage sheets as required. If after your initial review of this submittal . you would like to have a meeting to review this submittal please call at 458 -6840. When you have accepted both the report and the record drawings, a formal acceptance and letter documentation would be appreciated. Sincerely, Inl d Pacific gineering Co., Inc. Todd R. Whipple, P. TRW /tw cc: Dean - Housley, Mark Hancock file Supplemental Inspection Testing and Report Data 'rolecC ( AL- Project No.: S - .0 4 4_1(n —O llrb Address: 13 -ILA k KA % S51 c O Date: ( — (�"C S Weather: �/`� I Hours Day of Week: �- , Al Approved Plans on Site: ❑ Yes ❑.No C) Items Observed or Tested: ❑ Auger Cast Piles D) Attached Report: ❑ Resteel ❑ Grout . ❑ Structural Steel • Footings Concrete ❑ Columns ❑ Walls ❑ Mortar • Structural Slab - 13) All items observed appear to he in accordance with approved plans.and .pceitications: • Slab -on -Grade • Asphalt • Soils • Beams • Soils • Fireproofing ❑ Other • Other • Yes • No E) Location: DAILY FIELD REPORT M 2053 1. FI Comments: Q 1>3 t `r-Lt t-1 R` C1 x) t Y 3 P •5 Y H-1-1 � = 1 tv4t u- Dry he *1 uiAS r m rc } fit.E'T -b i4Nrl t?iFta)“-a ' — k1-Sr a s I A- -s ce 4tfo1K)r F4 I`blti Y (4,F eF Iv`T c)nr - rcb Per "?../ 124,4jc l on - ) F," t? u -Y XEAe0 Fes+& K.c r..csogritocrip. r /'44-0 ,F. CAticFl -t.Fa - ( )cf. J Prkcc 1� Fn. Howard Consultants, Inc. 1428 South Main Street, Moscow, ID 83843 L- 0 Function Hours Code Miles Code Total Expenses Code (7im tZF I 1 22 10 @ . 31 ,C. 11(1 Representauve: Sten:uure: Pa_c 1 of DAILY FIELD REPORT M 2053 1. FI Comments: Q 1>3 t `r-Lt t-1 R` C1 x) t Y 3 P •5 Y H-1-1 � = 1 tv4t u- Dry he *1 uiAS r m rc } fit.E'T -b i4Nrl t?iFta)“-a ' — k1-Sr a s I A- -s ce 4tfo1K)r F4 I`blti Y (4,F eF Iv`T c)nr - rcb Per "?../ 124,4jc l on - ) F," t? u -Y XEAe0 Fes+& K.c r..csogritocrip. r /'44-0 ,F. CAticFl -t.Fa - ( )cf. J Prkcc 1� Fn. Howard Consultants, Inc. 1428 South Main Street, Moscow, ID 83843 L- 0 Pngect: / (1)4/_/.< THIN T/,/c'/ 414 S/ Project Nu.: s 0 5'J C— Qi /O Address: a !.t. .011 Date: 6 7-7s- Weather: CL oopI/ 0 c / I i L Day of Week: f O Al Approved Plans on Site: ❑ Yes ❑ No C) Items Observed ❑ Footings or Tested: - •- - D) Attached Report: A_Concrete ❑ Resteel • Auger Cast Piles • Columns • Structural Slab • • Mortar • Grout 61 - - All items observed appear co be in accordance with approved plans and specifications: /A1 n FcD Tt/FY //A ❑ Slah -on -Grade 0 Beams 4 aUTTEt1? ❑ Asphalt ❑ Structural] Steel • Walls • Soils • Soils ❑ Fireproofing gOther Cl1RR • Other ❑ Yes • N o E) Location: C UR6 NO,e r/-' S /DF of /.(1 Dig 4.90 ( A fill? 0X. /25 t Sr CI e, eR RP Tprui rr yr THIN T/,/c'/ 414 S/ /U c /) C 2'iifl < 1,9f; r� a !.t. .011 FRoH 7TeucI rt. zz _ 0 c / I i L / C AP / Co,t9< r, rn (2/l /Fy, // /// 22 ` L OA X, C rnA s hi /1 C1/zd-- AM2 SA //2 TN /A1 n FcD Tt/FY //A (O,t) riAi a (7 O S D A S t 110T1Om Gc9 /I S /PCQf 1/2ED • -- pgr✓ pAgr p pc) Au aA rERuE/J Poo -S/ / L Gs /Up L COALPLE77e4- Ce, raj) 7 7 o fr' i9,1/) /77O,t.4L C YG 40Q5 ® 9.' 441 FRoH 7TeucI rt. zz Function Hours Code Miles Code Total Expen..cs Cod, CoAJ c frj 7 Z 22 ` L /0 tV .33 Co C C-7-E: z ; z�`f /O 3 3 nci Representative: LES iL, /Tr Sienature:E,. JN 4W Page 1 of F) Comments: /72R1 /C19 S. /'[Ac &iyEti i 4/UP rode ,eerr 4s' RCQ O i, Eel C fl j s, DAILY FIELD REPORT CO /1 Alt OQS � jef.LEP PFiPf CLQ/ T ESi S a fed PEA 19S77t ( «y/MP A 1/.-f c fl/E'OO / S � A)0 TO /11 O E 5 001..?41 Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road. Suite 5N, Spokane, WA 99200 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 891 -2012 S o Project: 9)i) eve_ euitya Project No.: ;t279K._ n � 0 �I Address: En- /{E/( $- 2249/,} Date: 4 17 - / Weather: C�G�� Day of Week:TN(,(e S A) Approved Plans on Site: C) Items Observed or Tested: D) Attached Report: • Yes ❑ No • Footings ❑ Auger Cast Piles ❑ Concrete • Resteel • Cody • Columns ❑ Structural Slab' " ❑ Mortar' • Grout • ' " B) All items observed appear to be in accordance with approved plans and specifications: ❑ Walls • Slah -on -Grade • Asphalt ❑ Structural Steel ❑ Soils ❑ Beams ❑ Other ❑ Soils ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Other • Yes • No E) Location: Q/J S / T r i DAILY FIELD REPORT S 001:16 F) Comments: f11P/?/LA E/7 A Ai Pi jr-a-77 u r e7 G y z /ND -oa5 t o 77,611Pmier To H Qr / 5 °wiz $$7X4 op , C2 XF rS, Howard Consultants, Inc. . N. 2128 Pines Road. Suite 5N, Spokane. WA 99206 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 391 -2012 Function Hours Code Miles fl Turd Expenses Cody / 22 9 Cw cry Signature: � C:I�ta Pa e 1 of HCI Representative & ---- j / /L / -- L i DAILY FIELD REPORT S 001:16 F) Comments: f11P/?/LA E/7 A Ai Pi jr-a-77 u r e7 G y z /ND -oa5 t o 77,611Pmier To H Qr / 5 °wiz $$7X4 op , C2 XF rS, Howard Consultants, Inc. . N. 2128 Pines Road. Suite 5N, Spokane. WA 99206 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 391 -2012 STA. OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. 1 13 141 (0 - a2.4. 142.7 3 r.. In IT 111.r,— 142, s i2-.7 3r7Y 7'22 142.8 9L 3 74- 2C 14/,:o 4 +L..( 3 t 13e ,,c 16,2 /2 Rs( I4S.9 *I.3 138 10+ S S p< 141.7 q2-1- 141.6 AVG. 141..4- 42-. STA OFFSET r DEPTH READINGS AVG. $-r50 ll 't7 141.1 143.4 qz S Purr 141 c:11--0 141.3 14/.3 74- 2C 7, LI 1407 - 14d - I q 1 1 8 /2 Rs( I4S.9 *I.3 144 , )- 10+ 14 if 14 3 13.61 14<.. AVG. I42.1 6 12.. I- Ivs ?54 Hvs 2S/ (r/? 'lld 2- L Fit) INLAND ASPHALT CO. ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMPACTION REPORT CONTRACT IAC GAUGE NO NO. ( O T 331 NO. L4/ r0 & SECTION 4 IV O 114 jf} • 4(/ REMARKS' INSPECTOR z erl SDV = SINGLE DRUM VIBRATORY ROLLER CODE: TS = TANDEM STEEL DDV = DOUBLE DRUM VIBRATORY 3WS = 3 WHEEL STEEL P = PNEUMATIC STA CONTROL LOT NO. _ TONS '7 ATB THICK 3 CLASS 8, D, E. F. G LANE: LT. 0g. ; ®, NB, SB OTHER LEVELING STD. OENSI ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR REMARKS: STA TO STA. CONTROL LOT NO ACP1 CLASS ATB B, D, E, F, G Al LANE:, ?)o `EB NB. SB OTHER LEVELING STD. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR STREET INSPECTOR - DISTRIBUTION: WHITE - FILE CANARY - SUPT. PINK - OA PROJECT ENGINEER ra - 1(o - DATE TO STA. WEARING RICE DENSITY / S? -t AIR J CONTRACTOR TONS THICK 7! , WEARING RICE DENSITY S4 r2- vl S AIR 7..9 y PAGE / OF L PAGES. IA-6 REV. 6/89 STA. OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. Z f' 9 ' L r /7R, / t- f3g.0 571 9' Rr 37,g Z t co /37. le 87? 3 74-00 V ' fir /3R D' � C 3 /39. 9 , 00 7 hr /37. G f s� 877 �t S' i r /38 yc /33 -' AVG. B / c /14 zsy /ft< 2,rf 6iquo.t1 2. Z f' Eie(1 INLAND ASPHALT CO. ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMPACTION REPORT CONTRACT LAC NO. / NO. SECTION AmR /io ' Y STA AVG. OFFSET DEPTH . READINGS AVG. REMARKS ROLLER CODE: SDV = SINGLE DRUM VIBRATORY TS = TANDEM STEEL DDV = DOUBLE DRUM VIBRATORY 3WS = 3 WHEEL STEEL P = PNEUMATIC GAUGE NO. PROJECT ENGINEER L II,J TO 5 STD. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR LEVELING STO. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR DISTRIBUTION: WHITE - FILE CANARY - SUPT. PINK - O.A. WEARING RICE DENSITY AIR DATE STA. TO STA. CONTROL LOT NO. TONS A P ATB THICK Z " CLASS 6, 0, E, F, G LANE: coo: EB, = SB OTHER LEVELING WEARING RICE DENSITY / 5 - 3. TEMP: MAT AIR o REMARKS: STA. TO STA CONTROL LOT NO. TONS ACP ATB THICK CLASS B. D, E, F, G LANE: LT. OR RT.; EB, WB, NB, SB OTHER INSPECTOR / ( r4 74 . STREET INSPECTOR CONTRACTOR PAGE 3 of 3 PAGES. IA -6 REV. 6/89 STA OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. f 5-0 /2' ,cr /n/ /y0,3 92 s /39;/ `L/ r /y0,/ /37,z 2 9-3--0 /38, / 7 7f5-o e'or /9 / 7 7/ / ? q,/ y t5-0 /S' 2r /547,% . r 21 - I/ Lr //742,z rfso /c'`-r. / yz'r iy/. 9 5 / /' AVG. z / D r5t 7/7 STA OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. 6�sr 7 /0,/-Z / , 7 o - /39;/ 3'<r /37,z 774-3`0 - /38. S 70 y 7 ', Q r /37,3 $ t /30.,s' 7o 3 C �� ( I/ Lr /"/. s 8 92 / ?3, R / /' /38. 6 z / D r5t /39 D (70 AVG. 70 8 Alt ZS'S' /9 VS 7r/ 68 yew 2. Z '` 474 //n 25-9 bin 7/ G A/✓o/) 2 2 4- Fi.0 INLAND ASPHALT CO. ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMPACTION REPORT CONTRACT IAC NO. NO. SECTION .z,( ) hoA A A ),l cr REMARKS: REMARKS C I INSPECTOR 4 LQ2 ROLLER CODE: SDV = SINGLE DRUM VIBRATORY TS = TANDEM STEEL DDV = DOUBLE DRUM VIBRATORY 3WS = 3 WHEEL STEEL P = PNEUMATIC GAUGE NO. 60 ra L STREET INSPECTOR STA. TO STA CONTROL LOT NO. TONS ATB THICK 3 I' CLASS B. D. E. F, G LANE: dOR @; , N8. S8 OTHER LEVELING WEARING V STD. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR STA CONTROL LOT NO. A B, D, E, F, G LANE Oi R ;GO NB. SB OTHER CLASS LEVELING STD. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR DISTRIBUTION: WHITE - FILE CANARY- SUPT. PINK - O.A. a /6 -9s DATE PROJECT ENGINEER RICE DENSITY / sl , AIR 70 TO STA TONS ATB THICK 3 '� CONTRACTOR WEARING RICE DENSITY /53, AIR PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGES. IA.6 REV. 6/89 DATE REPORTED: July 5, 1995 DATE RECEIVED: June 8, 1995 SPECIMEN: Concrete Riverwalk MIX NO.: 7906 Spokane, Washington LOCATION: Curb on north side, approximately 125' east of Barker Road. TEST METHODS: ASTM C -1064, C -231 TAG: 395475 AIR TEMP: 43'F TRUCK: 5164 MIX TEMP: 59'F TIME: 6:25 pm ENTRAINED AIR: 5.2% LABORATORY NUMBER " ' 1127(A) , 1r27(B) 1127(C) DATE CAST (ASTM C -31, C -172) 06/07/95 06/07/95 06/07/95 DATE TESTED (ASTM C -39) 06/14/95 07/05/95 07/05/95 AGE AT TEST, days 7 28 28 SLUMP, inches (ASTM C -143) 1; 11/2 1 DIMENSIONS, inches 6 x 12 6 x 12 6 x 12 AREA SQ., inches 28.26 28.26 28.26 APPARENT FRACTURE TYPE Cone Shear Cone MAXIMUM LOAD, pounds 102,000 126,000 129,000 ULTIMATE STRENGTH AS TESTED, psi 3605 4455 4560 REQUIRED 28 DAY STRENGTH, psi 3000 3000 3000 MEETS FAILS TO MEET NO STRENGTH CAST BY CAST BY SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS HCI OTHERS GIVEN X TRANSMITTAL TO: Ed Dean Construction c/o KC Construction - PO Box 1455 Havden, ID 83835 REMARKS /DEVIATIONS: COPY TO: HCI Howard Consultants, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 6r Geologists N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N, Spokane, WA 99206 509-891-1904 Fax 509-891-2012 Project No. 50416 -0110 Compression Test: ASTM C -39 Report No. 1574 Prujeet: R /I/ :ER 6.5,4 `k Project Nn.: Soli •` D// t, . Address: )0/A MA 1+ 2684"E2 Date: —/4.- 7J— Weather: C7 O0 /Or Day of Week: Fj0/ A) Approved Plans on Site: C) Items Observed or Tested: ❑ Footings ❑ Auger -Cast Piles - D1 Attached Report: • Yes ❑ No .. ... • Concrete • Resteel %In ❑ Columns • Structural Slab 0 Walls ❑ Slah-on -Grude ❑Soils ❑ Beams lt1 Other /l spNA • Mortar ❑ Grout B) All items observed appear to he to accordance with approved plans and specifications: t Fl- Asphalt • Structural Sire! ❑ Soils ❑ Fireproofing • Other AJU//E ■Yes ■No EE) /9p Rntothl y f/ [to O/ .f / 414,4 791/r , 6)957 OP' •• Location: f il ea I L .4. O ft i I U' 0 • nm c K 5 / /,' 20 /941. ?'?O 1- r _z t Code / P 29 I IRO tP %In 3 :20 -PM. Z6S ° F 2 z /0 , 3 3 AJU//E SS / 45PH11CT DAILY FIELD REPORT S 001E' =6 F) Comments: A Raid) A./i(, . OBSA?'Ud.9 Pi I r aF t4A PCR FOP,Wr/7 re Sri OA.) A SP/a c - r _5' E76= e &A- IPACT /QP RFPrAi Fok OR7 ». recite A- 27.9RrEC A ? F_ re •E 4 S rev_ Howard Consultants, Inc. - N. 2128 Pine:: Road, Suite 5N.. Spokane. WA 99206 Function Hours Code Miles Code Total Ex pethee Cod (2 4,14__ 2 z /0 , 3 3 AJU//E SS / 45PH11CT HO Repre.senunive: / /lit( / 7 Signature: 6 Pu_c 1 Of 5 DAILY FIELD REPORT S 001E' =6 F) Comments: A Raid) A./i(, . OBSA?'Ud.9 Pi I r aF t4A PCR FOP,Wr/7 re Sri OA.) A SP/a c - r _5' E76= e &A- IPACT /QP RFPrAi Fok OR7 ». recite A- 27.9RrEC A ? F_ re •E 4 S rev_ Howard Consultants, Inc. - N. 2128 Pine:: Road, Suite 5N.. Spokane. WA 99206 Project: { -�/C� 0 , J No. :.5 6 W tY ©/7 Address: Date: 7 -7 /- ! c - weather: ( Day of week: R / A) Approved Plans on Site: C) Items Observed or Tested: D) Attached Report • Yes • No • Footin_s • Auger Cast Piles ❑ Concrete • Resteel ❑ Columns ❑ Structural Slah ❑ Mortar • Grout at All items observed appear to he in accordance with approved plans and specifications: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ walls • Slah -on -Grade ❑Asphal( ❑ Structural Steel Soils 0 Beams grSuils • Fireproofing • Other Other E) Location: OF/ RJ}� (P n R »X/?LI? ,Wa -- T 9 O Function Hours Codc Miles C c Total Expenses Cute •)/L Z zz /7 33 4)1 .4. - / 110 Representative: S / 444//7 -, Z -- a ( Signature: # ` Page I of • DAILY FIELD REPORT F, Comments: a10 (i&72 /f "1,1 , /Wide 7 - 6 R - 07 r CoX9S77 C/c/'h Al //1ED 7`0 N/, / GU • .Ch 0 PR o c TE,Q 6L512 Z S` ,c o,c Tls t/X 96t 7 ID cif) 7? s5 1/hi7/tWO o cg r/ Ox) 4c9 7 ,t 9 0 GL .Q //DCA19/0 /L/CR SE 6- A he R cPcRr /cog 40,4 739V Pcszo /r / Lc 1)6Prit9D OA) RcSOc S o/c Dc — d�. 13ur Gen OM (Y CA Rey U ��Y Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road. Suite 5N, Spokane. \C -\ 0920o • DAILY FIELD REPORT F, Comments: a10 (i&72 /f "1,1 , /Wide 7 - 6 R - 07 r CoX9S77 C/c/'h Al //1ED 7`0 N/, / GU • .Ch 0 PR o c TE,Q 6L512 Z S` ,c o,c Tls t/X 96t 7 ID cif) 7? s5 1/hi7/tWO o cg r/ Ox) 4c9 7 ,t 9 0 GL .Q //DCA19/0 /L/CR SE 6- A he R cPcRr /cog 40,4 739V Pcszo /r / Lc 1)6Prit9D OA) RcSOc S o/c Dc — d�. 13ur Gen OM (Y CA Rey U ��Y Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road. Suite 5N, Spokane. \C -\ 0920o Project: l C 1 V E fAL� - - -- r 3AgirEn o �/ D Pc.. i Nn.: S 05/ �' 0/1...2::, Address: yours Code Date: 7 -2 5t n--- Weather: 5' C9 n i ck fro ( L. b u Expense, Code Day or Week: L a Al Approved Plans Site: C) items Observed ❑ Footings ❑ Columns or Tested: ❑ Auger Cast Piles • Structural Slab D) Attached Report: Rested Grout Structural Strcl Fireproutinc • Yes lux -tvo • Concrete • ❑ Mortar • BI All items observed appear to he in accordance with approved plans and specihcaiions: ■Yes ■No� ❑ Slab-on-Grade ❑ Beams • Walls IN Asphalt • 'S oils ❑ Other 2iS oils • ❑ Other Signature: � ' Pace 1 of . E) Location 0 f9 -- IC �f}/�P 77) R /<O i $% dUM1.0 ' .—r 2 ._ _— DAILY FIELD REPORT 5 0 01 13972 F} Comments: A��1 �P /7 EY �rc // ./E PER cMxjr& 0 A s , irur) .(1e ,erHtr,9n cCIJII r L E L, / r Y C o e.__A & /= 0R +9 P e O , S /TE. rPLC TD Lip niF 7H THtr PQO TC= R /C0 it TL/E J e L r. GO 1 ,4 1s >} / 3 ` f . 6 r c, v e CA / ) c ip c 7.7 (04 , r RRNn OD c'- ii OA? S (Ui 7 /0 tic r A/Z 0CA, 10/ lZ ,5 Fc TiE D rAis/7 -q /s'EPoR7- • Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road. Suitt SN. Spokane. AV'A 99200 Function yours Code Miles / �, Code Toga) Expense, Code C /L 2_ Z23 . 3 3 !ICI Ii q - r Signature: � ' Pace 1 of . � r DAILY FIELD REPORT 5 0 01 13972 F} Comments: A��1 �P /7 EY �rc // ./E PER cMxjr& 0 A s , irur) .(1e ,erHtr,9n cCIJII r L E L, / r Y C o e.__A & /= 0R +9 P e O , S /TE. rPLC TD Lip niF 7H THtr PQO TC= R /C0 it TL/E J e L r. GO 1 ,4 1s >} / 3 ` f . 6 r c, v e CA / ) c ip c 7.7 (04 , r RRNn OD c'- ii OA? S (Ui 7 /0 tic r A/Z 0CA, 10/ lZ ,5 Fc TiE D rAis/7 -q /s'EPoR7- • Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road. Suitt SN. Spokane. AV'A 99200 Pmjecl:g II /E/l6u9L,y Date - 2 v-95— f Location of Fill: r ' �� F FIELD DENSITY TEST REPORT Report No. S/ 83? QAR�� R r 90 Project No.:soV/ —d, Day of Week: M wulher. S GATi Q'E Test Method: Howard Consultants, Inc. • N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite SN, Spokane. WA 99206 General Contractor. n A! T _ Kr Cr l j a Lit Superintende ,c Atli / C H Earthwork Contractor: Foreman' Test Number Test Location Elev Proctor Number Probe Depth Test Moist Content % • Test Dry Density pcf Percent Compaction Remarks r /OD r f Tint: RA Sr ( /0" ? / Z7 5 7 4 7- / , 571 c fl 4T e F / / .( / /(J C 9', ! r 3 /29.5. 9 7 to 64 a — / )6 I • as _ as Procmr Number Soil Description Maximum Dry Density Optimum Moisture Content Method Standard /Modified I I e l c£ fl 5t ( O U / ? ' C /,- fr 0 'I I Representative: I , E " A O HCI 1 Sigwturc • • a / . P age Zan -2----- -2----- Pmjecl:g II /E/l6u9L,y Date - 2 v-95— f Location of Fill: r ' �� F FIELD DENSITY TEST REPORT Report No. S/ 83? QAR�� R r 90 Project No.:soV/ —d, Day of Week: M wulher. S GATi Q'E Test Method: Howard Consultants, Inc. • N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite SN, Spokane. WA 99206 w 1- 0 w 0 0 ca w 140 2 135 0 0 LL 130 0 m 125 0 120 uJ 0_ 115 0 z 110 0 105 100 0 95 o 90 0 85 80 0 n\ \ 9 1111 1111 111 1111 1111 1111 1 111 1111 1111 5 10 15 20 25 WATER CONTENT HCI 30 35 40 (PERCENT) PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk PROJECT NO: SO416 -0110 DATE: July 24, 1995 SAMPLE LOCATION: Unknown. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Light brown coarse sand with gravel. TEST PROCEDURE: ASTM D -1557, METHOD: C, Modified MOISTURE CONTENT: 6.O% DRY DENSITY: 139.5 PCF REFERENCE NO.: SL1184 REMARKS /DEVIATIONS: 45 PROCTOR TEST RESULTS Howard Consultants, Inc. Mt a Asphalt and Cement Concrete Testing Results 1 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. MEMORANDUM Date: June 12, 1996 To: Jerry Peterson From: Todd R. Whipplt Subject: Riverwalk 1st Addition - Construction Inspection W.O. No. 96106 Jerry: Per our conversation earlier today, I have enclosed a map with the approximate locations of the coring samples for the above referenced project shown. These locations have been spray painted in the field with the white paint that you provided. Try to have the curb & gutter core taken approximately in the middle of the gutter pan section. The sidewalk cores should be taken on the white dots only (self explanatory in the field). If you have any questions regarding what testing is required please see me, or if you know the program you want followed please write it up and submit it to me with a copy to the file. Thanks 707 West 7th • Suite 200 . Spokane, WA 99204 2021) Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 I L8 • —etc - � ��_ - tan &ItzI* I p Immo PACFIC ENGINEER/No A,— T..,+. no We.M /D1 9 is& GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers P �c j 2 2020 E. Springfield • Spokane, WA 99202 • Telephone (509) 534 -3670 • Fax 534 -2925 • \ c •• August 27, 1996 Dean - Housley Corporation c/o Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. 707 W. Seventh Avenue, Suite 200 • Spokane, Washington 99204 Attn: Mr. Todd Whipple, P.E. RESULTS OF MEASUREMENTS AND BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY TESTING OF ASPHALT CONCRETE CORES, RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON Attached are the results of measurements and bulk specific gravity testing of asphalt concrete cores you provided from the Rivenvalk,First Addition site. The testing was accomplished in.general accordance with our confirming letter of August 12, 1996, which you authorized on August 16, 1996. The cores, each•approximately 3.7 inches in diameter, were delivered to our office by Spokane Concrete Cutting bn August 6, 1996: Our work included measuring the length of each core to the closest 0.1 inch and conducting bulk specific gravity testing (ASTM D 2726) on each of them. Results are summarized on the attached Table 1. We appreciate the opportunity to be 'of service to you on this project. If you have any questions about the results, please let us know. Sincerely, GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Encls: Table 1 Grant R. Cummings, P.E.,. P.G. Senior Engineer ®® Allen B. Gifford, P.E. President E- 1718 -02 PM CC: List lo.: TABLE 1 (Th Bulk Core Specific Number Gravity Density (pct Length (in.i 1 2.37 147.9 • 3.4 2 2.21 137.9 3.4 3 2.32 144.8 3.2 4 2.32 144.8 2.8 5 2.33 145.4 2.8 6 2.37 147.9 3.0 7 2.29 142.9 2.8 8 2.35 146.6 3.4 L- 1718 -02 GC" GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers 2020 E. Springfield • Spokane, WA 99202 • Telephone (509) 534 -3670 • Fax 534 -2925 Dean - Housley Corporation c/o Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. 707 W. Seventh Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson, P.E. Project Manager July 12, 1996 RESULTS OF UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TESTING, RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION CONCRETE CORES, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON E- 1718 -01 Attached are the results of measurements and compression testing of concrete cores you provided from the Riverwalk First Addition site. The testing was accomplished in general accordance with our proposal of June 19, 1996, which was authorized by Mr. Mark Hancock, on July 1, 1996. The cores, as delivered to our lab, ranged in diameter from 1.73 to 1.74 inches and in length from 2.4 to 5.6 inches. Cores that were sufficiently long to yield a test specimen having a length -to- diameter ratio of about 2 were trimmed and tested for unconfined compressive strength. Of the 37 cores delivered, 25 were tested. Dean Housley Corporation c/o Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. July 12, 1996 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions about the results, please let us know. Sincerely, GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Allen B. Gifford, P. President Encl: Table 1 - Concrete Core Lengths Table 2 - Concrete Core Compressive Strength Invoice E- 1718 -01 Page 2 TABLE 1 CONCRETE CORE LENGTHS Average Length Before Trimming Core (Inches) A 3.6 B 3.8 C 2.4 D 3.3 E 3.9 I 3.4 G 3.2 H 3.4 I 4.2 J 4.0 K 2.7 L 4.6 M 4.0 N 4.5 O 3.3 P 3.6 Q 5.3 R 14 1 5.2 2 5.4 3 5.3 4 5.0 5 5.0 6 5.0 7 5.6 8 5.0 8 (Alt.) 5.5 9 4.3 10 5.9 11 5.5 12 5.0 13 4.8 14 5.0 15 5.0 16 5.0 17 5.0 18 5.0 E- 1718 -01 ;E= 1718 =01 TABLE 2 CONCRETE CORE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH Riverwalk 1st Addition Core Weight, g Weight, Ibs. Length Diameter Radius Area Volume Unit Weight Load, Ibs Load, psi Core L/D Ratio E 294.5 0.649 3.343 1.730 0.8650 2.351 7.8581 142.77 12900 5488 E 1.93 I 312.1 0.688 3.568 1.730 0.8650 2.351 8.3870 141.76 10680 4543 1 2.06 J 306.4 0.675 3.415 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.0925 144.24 12020 5072 J 1.97 L 301.5 0.665 3.425 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.1162 141.52 14900 6288 L 1.97 M 274.8 0.606 3.201 1.737 0.8685 2.370 7.5853 138.01 14160 5975 M 1.84 N 288.2 0.635 3.336 1.735 0.8675 2.364 7.8871 139.21 11300 4780 N 1.92 0 304.6 0.672 3.405 1.735 0.8675 2.364 8.0502 144.15 13820 5845 Q 1.96 Average 141.67 5427 1 295.4 0.651 3.255 1.732 0.8660 2.356 7.6690 146.74 17300 7343 1 1.88 2 300.0 0.661 3.395 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.0451 142.06 17560 7410 2 1.95 3 306.2 0.675 3.420 1.730 0.8650 2.351 8.0391 145.10 18340 7802 3 1.98 4 311.6 0.687 3.460 1.732 0.8660 2.356 8.1520 145.62 18400 7810 • 4 2.00 5 298.1 0.657 3.341 1.730 0.8650 2.351 7.8534 144.60 21260 9044 5 1.93 6 302.9 0.668 3.310 1.737 0.8685 • 2.370 7.8436 147.12 19920 8406 6 1.91 7 315.0 0.694 3.444 1.732 0.8660 2.356 8:1143 147.89 17320 7351 7 1.99 8 312.8 0.690 3.429 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.1256 146.65 19100 8060 8 1.97 9 311.0 0.686 3.380 1.740 0.8700 2.378 8.0372 147.41 20520 8630 9 1.94 10 310.1 0.684 3.400 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.0569 146.63 16260 6862 10 1.96 11 308.4 0.680 3.306 1.737 0.8685 2.370 7.8342 149.97 17200 7258 11 1.90 12 314.4 0.693 3.411 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.0830 148.18 19140 8077 12 1.96 13 309.6 0.683 3.440 1.738 0.8690 2.372 8.1611 144.52 19240 8110 13 1.98 14 312.7 0.689 3.433 1.730 0.8650 2.351 8.0697 147.62 17500 7445 14 1.98 15 318.8 0.703 3.464 1.740 0.8700 2.378 8.2369 147.44 20640 8680 15 1.99 16 321.0 0.708 3.442 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.1564 149.93 18800 7934 16 1.98 17 306.6 0.676 3.400 1.740 0.8700 2.378 8.0848 144.47 19500 8201 17 .. 1.95 18 270.4 0.596 2.935 1.737 0.8685 2.370 6.9550 148.11 20500 8391 18 1.69 Average 146.67 7934 TABLE 2 E- 1718 -01 Misc. Drainage Calculations t 4.Anw1ed19 0•01 • - 7yt t_ r"") 5 -1 -4-y9 2 0 (5- D Circular Channel Analysis & Design Solved with Manning's Equation Worksheet Name: RIVERWALK 1ST Comment: CULVERT ON INDIANA Solve For Actual Discharge Given Input Data: Diameter Slope Manning's n Depth Computed Results: Discharge Velocity Flow Area Critical Depth Critical Slope Percent Full Full Capacity QMAX @.94D Froude Number Open Channel - Uniform flow 1.00 ft" 0.0133 ft /ft7 0.013 0.50 ft 2.05 cfs 5.23 fps 0.39 sf 0.61 ft 0.0069 ft /ft 50.00 % 4.11 cfs - 4.42 cfs 1.47 (flow is Supercritical) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.41 (c) 1991 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 Circular Channel Analysis & Design Solved with Manning's Equation Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: RIVERWALK 1ST Comment: CULVERT ON INDIANA Solve For Full Flow Capacity Given Input Data: Diameter 1.00 ft Slope 0.0133 ft /ft Manning's n 0.013 Discharge 4.11 cfs Computed Results: Full Flow Capacity 4.11 cfs Full Flow Depth 1.00 ft Velocity 5.23 fps Flow Area 0.79 sf Critical Depth 0.86 ft Critical Slope 0.0124 ft /ft Percent Full 100.00 % Full Capacity 4.11 cfs QMAX @.94D 4.42 cfs Froude Number FULL Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.41 (c) 1991 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 Worksheet Name: RIVERWALK 1ST Comment: CULVERT ON INDIANA, 10 YR STORM Solve For Actual Depth Given Input Data: Diameter Slope Manning's n Discharge Computed Results: Depth Velocity Flow Area Critical Depth Critical Slope Percent Full Full Capacity QMAX @.94P Froude Number Circular Channel Analysis & Design Solved with Manning's Equation Open Channel - Uniform flow 1.00 ft 0.0133 ft /ft 0.013 1.02 cfs = 1.02 CFS 0.34 ft 4.34 fps 0.24 sf 0.42 ft 0.0058 ft /ft 33.95 4.11 cfs 4.42 cfs 1.54 (flow is Supercritical) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.41 (c) 1991 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 Circular Channel Analysis & Design Solved with Manning's Equation Worksheet Name: RIVERWALK 1ST Open Channel - Uniform flow Comment: CULVERT ON INDIANA, 50 YR STORM = 1.29 CFS Solve For Actual Depth Given Input Data: Diameter 1.00 ft Slope 0.0133 ft /ft Manning's n 0.013 Discharge 1.29 cfs Computed Results: Depth 0.38 ft Velocity 4.63 fps Flow Area 0.28 sf Critical Depth 0.48 ft Critical Slope 0.0060 ft /ft Percent Full 38.49 % Full Capacity 4.11 cfs QMAX @.94D 4.42 cfs Froude Number 1.52 (flow is Supercritical) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.41 (c) 1991 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 .1.. 4- , • • •1 1 • . : 1 -.4 • 0 re. le' til i? , , .„ •• - u ,..--4 ;4 ..<7,, . 6. . , . . . . ..,,, „ , , - - , -...., ..-•,•;,-.:1,1 7(n. - ...-= (1. ) ptkii7,€' Y ..."‘''•11"14•:"'• -‘11..Z;t4.4;:*-V41.„‘`t zt '1 0441 tpholi • 41 ik• ;.?; - • tre -t " 4 % - Z•44.11 j; • - ":(Si;•Yi•Vt C*Ttti-ii!••• -C4 4:14.•./N•C;;;Stg'•‘4'P ti7.1-111--C,4•4....pa't•44WPLeaZ • •..4* 7 ' St r'; 4V- - • sat . f d Aipsinitei-4-?2,fs ; trt: 411'1 -- NO' • iRtioneNo cieta ima - • "; ' 4 1' 1 ' •• 4Persbaleallifigies,litd• 1 , to •NrLIA,1 • CsuLAMeettngetra- - - **'‘. nna; tiF.tViC4 ;4 • .,' * il*1 . 4 0 • , ; • .. • ; 3 ... ?.. • - 4... ) . r. '.:. '',.. • . . ?.,* ! • ....: :. • - •::‘ < .`: u ".. . i ,' ' " ../:` ■. , -' . , k 2 f eta Ir ' 4 .1,4:0., 4 . ' 4, . ' ) •e , . :.. :'.1' ^ ai4 '' gi:Olati:4,4.%I.:111 . f 1 .. - • • • • ".. -.a3 r: •&-a:If -.94:,;.-,../A4-4.;le 1 l .....C:•,;.,f lit 1, C a •c-rc„fa. - v:i....... . ; . ,... 4 .1,, .1...1- .4.:.-• • • .. 2, . •? r...'. i .... fL2 ..tT -3 .,,1 7 4W 47 ----; ;.1•., --., .i.-„: . # . a I . r i : ... -"" 4 .7 ' . t•- /. fr :''..."1. V....• • 1 /! . ..-22. c• ! tri . " kid j. 2 -- -,;. : I ; . •• -fi . • - • • i 't • ••• . • . ^ • • • It 14 "r i .4. C • CI- 1W' 4•4 " 1 . 1 .aat4ra 4 ;42til S , • .? .4:41 ;-•.... ..•.14a;W:tl‘'S#43•44.1itaZat.na- 4 •• I ;It- on.n...,....a..-• --...- •;',Y '' .-7-.C.{-tAl."4.;- . -4- ."‘.22"..' 1% “ i-,-.- , ,-,1/4.-- .."?...),:iv .4.4 ..-....-t-, - , ...A.A.. r' Wkr.:4,..; • //iir a/V ,,,;•.- , 3,e. ,,, - .1-, ,:t41:i -; 7 -,1,'`I-7Ste ff . n l ri C44ate ... 4,4- A -; .7:1?4////4 - -. J• V Alf • 1:- 4 {,:,d,:ain .4. .1 11: • -0 - ' 1 14 ,4 :444,- ,.- - -...N • $ c-Atit .../. /.., .„ , , }:•--- ..,,.. ( --ex - .4.1 - , .. - , ::•1;' , 6 0... - •,•., ,;.- c.... ...y.c.w t.i. 0- ., .; :g.--„ 1 .4.- tv a tim,..( , ),-4- t ;r2s.-: ; 1, 7 „.-, , p ,, cs,s, ..,..., . . 2 . 4 . ; ..‘ „,•:c,,. x.. Wert. .,,,, ' ■ '01 _a n 0 - --.; mms:• : - , ,.., ..::„- • •ft .r.. • it i ... • , , .. ; : '. - tial-a, -rx,-,-,yr havel iri ta:artervieidt-- - .e.: ; ' - il; (. • • ;? \Li' ,.i' ›E„b er• . 4 .^: ... ... • 0 1 :, ct ...' I ) :1 ' 4 ' 1- 4 ' . Z.:11a. l '1:1..t.:14-taa.....‘„w' 'III; ? Cf..;..tt:.14.1. 1 ."....;:::144.14• 1 1Le t ett"....";,-.; . ; 4 24.4' j •-• ,.*:' 5••.- • • ,," . 1, S ....kitert4 1.-1_,:-,-; _ ___ „ e.--,:tzwc., .-..wis,... ,_:-.,...1 .,. 4r - ,,,.. ..,...k.,: . •.., • •:,... '-"Z 4 . 4 1 - 4 z J."(:■-; X e 1 e 4 k a 4,1e3t C :3:ii..2.; - el•-c-rilk-A- - 44,--,44.4.74C te!,..t - ' 0 rt.,.... 004:71. •- - •.% ••,sofrre... . . • • f • '41••• -"` 4 -• , 1 • r .4- ' yht ;v.; • ;-= • . :•• • • • •• 414 '•:=Stitleot /*Ad • k. •;,471 :14t1t 1 ••;Z,Q. t • ' . • . - , - MA& - tfet-itts441. . - • : ‘: 416.1 PAL 'teal /tied t , • -.0:1 • •••• - - • x 1 4.41 tratai 1111. jd SN' Attested By: • - a. z it , g:..4. j • :4 "1;•'1":11SI: .in" • ; •,' ; 1 5 • -4. . Ny ?'1.• ' s *,- i.ar • S E • sit , g ,1;/ ;:••/ r• •••• ••0? OTEICOEN:GINEERTING .COMIRMis . t, szt.L472419t omiroF,..€0 ‘.'41 , • . u • rrt" t 4:2 144-1. gil,t; -so , • 1 :4;* • • • tg; 4 f: ' .1 • '4 ti 4- I. 4. :r1 4i ii '1 - • ; • rECORaD OF4C ONVERSATI ., alb /ii• i ~ _ urL�7igv� I • c . `ti tcuc I: 1.44, G'k. Attested By: • PM -r2 "101 1 `?'LrloL CC: List Initials r 10/11/96 11:41 FAX 206 869 6620 DEAN /HOUSLEY LLC 0CT - 11 - 1996 0954 01150415 0213041402150514 Gendemen: I jl, • 1 . Lr ��rzKt :acre. -••• ,.. r • r ter `. DIVISION OF ENC 4EGRLWG AND ROADS Win:.,,. A. Johns. P.E. County .Engineer October 11. 1996 Ed Dean Mark Hancock Dean Housley Company 16720 14.E. 116th Street Redmond, WA 98052 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 1st Addition P1414A - Riverwalk P.U.D. 2nd Addition P14148 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 3rd Addition Submittal of Construction Documentation and Record Drawings We have had several discussions with you and your enginrr (Inland Pacific Engineering) over the past 6 months regarding the expected submittal of the Record Drawings and Construction Documentation for these projects. As you will recall. the County's original posidon was that the Plats of 2nd and 3rd Additions would not rive Final Approval until all the work for Indiana Avenue was completed by your contractor. certified by your engineer. and accepted by the County Engineer's Office. This resulted from your failure to secure a permit for the work in the right of way for Indiana Avenue prior to starting consttvcdon. I am concerned that you will be submitting these documents at a point in time when the weather will not allow (a) a proper Final Inspection to take place. and/or (b) corrective action ro be properly made on items of deficient work. I need to see a submittal of all the construction documentation. to include certified Record Drawings. no later -than 12 noon, October 31, 1996_ This submittal will need to comply with the requirements of Section 9 of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. as well as the guidance I have provided to your engineer in my earlier discussions and correspondence with them. If this does not occur, I will be forced to take further actions as are necessary to ensure that this material is submitted in a timely fashion; these actions may include revocation of apprnach permits, restriction of lot building permits. et al._. If you have any further questions or comments, please contact me at 456 - 3600_ Thank you. into r��lY, t will . Spokane County • A DIVISION of THE Puauc WORTS DEPARTb(c'NT Dennis M. Scott, P.E.. Director 11;3omn, -MU( Maim/ -Toon Witierta" - j3 auci' Maato m: project file Spokane County Public Works Dir ®r. Dennis Scoa. P.E. Spokane Cmo ry Engineer's Offie: Bell Haasin,c. P.E. Ed Parry. P.E. Spolygigogyota7eaars.Sdpi a mroscsn1eln11 -0170 • post 4S6 - 3900 FAX (509) 324.347e TDD: (509) 324 - 3t66 MAN< ft: eater— TOTAL P.02 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. Via Facsimile ) Page otal August 22, 1996 W.O. No. 96106 Dean- Housley Company Spokane /Green Acres, WA Attn: Vern Jacobsen Re: Riverwalk 1st Dear Vern: Per our recent conversations regarding the drainage pond at the southwest quadrant of the Indiana and Harmony intersection, I have stopped by and looked at it two or three times now and I think that the only way to make it work will require either a 2 -foot tall stone wall or a 2 -foot tall keystone wall thereby increasing the overall pond bottom area by the square feet required. Please see the enclosure. Call with any questions. Thanks. Sincerely, InlaVd Pacific Engineering Co., Inc. i t Todd R. Whipple, P. TRW /tw 707 West 71h • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509 -458 -6844 cc: Mark Hancock, Dean- Housely, Redmond, WA file 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 0 N REVISED POND BOTTOM DESIGNED POND BOTTOM BUILT TOP OF BERM BASIN F BUILT POND BO REQUIRED '208' POND VOLUME = 202 CU.FT. DESIGNED '208' POND VOLUME = 450 CU.FT. CONSTRUCTED '208' POND VOLUME = 175 CU.FT. (REVISED '208' POND VOLUME = 238 CU.FT.) • Q6vtGr -. id- 4-1- cL+ �� I 6. eupt. Paw( Tmkuvm . ryti 51 .127,45 Ts 2027 TS 2027.99 202825 SrA 8 REVISED POND BOTTOM pN2oea4s VV ) DESIGNED POND BOTTOM DESIGNED POND BOTTOM BUILT TOP OF BERM BASIN F REQUIRED '208' POND VOLUME = 202 CU.FT. DESIGNED '208' POND VOLUME = 450 CU.FT__ CONSTRUCTED '208' POND VOLUME = 175 CU.FT. (REVISED '208' POND VOLUME = 238 CU.FT.) 29.57 e v 29A7 . TB BUILT POND BOTTOM \ 2028.51 TA AUG 9 -96 FRI 16:18 GIFFORD UUrISULIRNIS INU. 5095342925 P.01 f' Transmittal Date 4106 PLEASE FAX TO: ]J l � Firm rte- c FAX No. / ciJ�- 6 Name / 0 'K i d NOTES: GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. • 2020 E.Springfield Ave, Spokane, WA 99202 • Telephone: (509) 534 -3670 Fax (509) 534 -2925 e FACSIMILE COVER SHEET e FROM: GIFFORD CONSULTANT - S, INC. Name 6 re I? C - _ -. »t c�Itc Total No. of pages transmitted, including cover sheet: 1� Job No E /7' /g--02 Ora 7" AOmAJ .L.ArrlIMAJ 8:ve,veteki st eic: i 3 6 e3 ( -' /• /- C1 ; biA-6 7- 7(Dc 7° s16 OK) RIP. Po • 3P,65 fLY.,2 -• 1 tt / 13-c 3.2 r .2 4:4 t I 0 r.UPG 2.4Q • //r, 4:14' • 3.€) • • • • • r • • • RIVERWALK 1ST ADDITION ASBUILTS 7/31/96 NIE Comments page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION Sheet Item Description (inc. repeats) Do It Des Dev'n Dwgs 1 1 Notes: Hydroseed Swales Veme 2 Notes: Plant grassy infiltration areas Verne 3 Notes: House construction disru • ions n/a 4 C• Augusta & Sandusky KC 5 Notes: Hydroseed . .. • grassy Verne e Notes: plans Note 7 L McMillan not built Turn in 8 park, • ' • Note 9 Harmony stops at Indiana .. - .. I Note 10 Tum in 11 I Ponds to be . • • and . Note 2 1 No slo on retaining wall Turn in 2 No tumaround or improvements at end of Indiana Tum in 3 Type 2 inlet not constructed at McMillan/Indiana pond KC 4 Type A drywell replaced with Type 2 inlet Turn in 7) 5 No gutter built at north end.of McMillan along Indiana Tum In 6 Note that pond asbuilts are on detail sheets Note 7 Misc. notes: end wall, ramps, lights, park Note 8 Repeats: 1.9, see above 3 1 Asphalt, ramp, pond w /drywell not built © Sandusky KC 2 Drywall, underdratn, pond not built so. of Augusta KC 3 Augusta pavement, sidwalk, ramp not built KC 4 Type 2 inlet not installed on Harmony north of Augusta I KC 5 ' Augusta street sign not installed KCNeme 6 Note Baldwin/Harmony drywell built 15' north - Note 7 Note that pond asbullts are on detail sheets Note 8 Repeats: 1.5, 1.9, 1.10, see above 4 1 Restore Baldwin swales in front of houses KCNeme 2 Secure drywell metal plate cover © Baldwin /McMillan KC 3 Pond P not installed (not on our • roperty] Tum in 4 Repeats: 2.6, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5; 1 see above 5 1 Swales not built on west side of McMillan KC 2 Sidewalk meanders around h drant & water valves Tum in 3 Repeats: 1.7, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7 see above 6 1 Swale not constructed alon. Barker KC 2 Note says ROW south of Indiana is future 1 n/a? DM rO I q JOfi 9Ci06 , 1 CC: g ist Initials 07/31/96 20:26 FAX 206 869 6620 ) DEAN /HUUSLEY LLC - I'o: Tabu 1 4 Nakao Ueu l ccorxchi a co A R W1 AS BLT.XLS 4_J 001 'ERWALK 1ST ADDITION ASBUILTS 7/31/96 NIE Comments page 2 of 2 RESOLUTION Sheet Item' Description (Inc. repeats) Do It Des Dev'n Dwgs 3 w KC 7 sure Mission asphalt, taper & paint per plans I ' Make Verif curbs (NIE notes it wasn't done) Repeat: Sidewalk along Mission way in (1.10) IPE Tum in — m ° NIE says ditch / swale slopes & ret'n dams not verified IPE Temp: filtration fence "not constructed" n/a ( ?) 3 Catch basin pipe note: "CMP Used" OK? 4 Clean D ells KC 5 NIE note that easement not in wall area T OK? 6 Re. :ats: 1.5, 1.10 ( swale) ✓ 1 NIE note: "Not all driveways installed as required" OK? NIE note: "Not all driveways constructed at this time" OK? 1 Pond asbuilt capacities noted OK? "Ink "12 inch CMP Installed" OK? Relocated underdrain at Harmony Swale filled in at Harmony /Baldwin /Indiana (Basin F) (Basin G) OK? KCNeme Re. eats: 1.5, 1.9, 2.2 2.7, see above 9B D ell not exposed 6 McMillan/Indiana KC Added Ty.e 2 inlet & 12" CMP at McMillan /Baldwin ("0") Tum In Repeats: 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.6, 4.2, 4.3, 5.1, 9A.1 see above 9C 1 No NIE notes II n/a ou c%J LU rna LOU ou° OULU ✓r. All / IIV VOLE 1 LLIe t_j vLl RW 1 ASBLT.XLS Via Facsimilie, 8 (eight) Pages Total July 16, 1996 W.O. No. Dean- Housley Company 16720 NE 116th Street Redmond, WA 98052 Attn: Mark Hancock Re: Riverwalk 1st Addition (P -1414) Curb and Sidewalk Coring Results Dear Mark: Enclosed are the testing results from the concrete coring performed by Gifford Consultants and Spokane Concrete Coring. The information and results relevant to our situation are shown on Table 1 and Table 2. Please note that the minimum thickness on the sidewalk is 4.0 inches and the minimum depth on the gutter is 6.0 inches, I have enclosed standard Spokane County details for your reference. For the most part all thicknesses are substandard and will not be accepted by Spokane County without the payment of a penalty. This penalty will need to be paid by your concrete curb sub - contractor and will need to be paid prior to acceptance. The only plus is that the structural strength tested well above the 3,000 psi requirements. Should you have any questions concerning this issue please call at 458 -6840. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering Co., Inc. Todd R. Whipple, P.E. TRW /tw file enclosure 'Mo 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509- 458.6844 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. cc: Verne Jacobsen, Dean - Housely, Spokane, WA file 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208 - 765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 11 1/2 2 3/4 m PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE 16 TYPE "A" OUANTITY . 0.036025 C.Y./ LF. SEE NOTE 6 <1 "-I 24" b - -10' 2 12 2 3/4' TYPE "R" 3 1/2 QUANTITY - 0.052259 C.T. / LE. PAVEMENT PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK OPTIONAL FOR INTEGRAL POUR. 24 TYPE "B" OUANnTY - 0.047657 C.Y. / LE. /EPDXY SEE NOTE SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS fNfnC. W MOS 456-m A EXISTING CURB- 18- Ir 1 i 1 3/8' CONCRETE GUTTER OUANn1Y - 00244149 CT. / LE. / s2 4' PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE APPROVED: co UM 18' 22 VARIES ASPHALT CONCRETE TYPE "C QUANTITY - 0.023123 TONS / L.F. SEE NOTE 6 12 R �1' TYPE "M" QUANTITY - 0.022633 C.Y. / LF. • GENERAL NOTES 1 TYPE "S" OUANTITY - 0.016519 CY. / LE. 1. PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 3000 CONFORMING• TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. WEAICENED PLANE JOINTS FOR PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SHALL BE PLACED AT 15' INTERVALS. 1 3/6' EXPANSION JOINTS in PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SHALL BE PLACED AT CURB RETURNS. 4. EPDXY CEMENT SHALL BE APPLIED AT A 10-15 MIL THICKNESS AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE REDUIREMENTS OE SECTION 9 -26 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CONSTRUCTION OE TYPE it CURB SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION B -04 Or THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT THAT PORTLAND CEMENT SHALL BE REPLACED WITH "TRINITY WHITE' CEMENT. IRE FDC511 SHALL BE STEEL TROWELLED TO PROVIDE A DENSE. SLIOOTH REFLECTIVE FINISH. 6. TO BE USED ONLY IN SPEOAL CASES WITH APPROVAL Or THE COUNTY ENGINEER. 7. CURBS SHALL HAVE A UCIT °ROOMED FINISH. CUTTERS SHALL BE FINISHED WTH A STEEL TROWEL STANDARD_:= CURBS & CUTTERS rra-ma Inc SHEET A-3 NOWT ROAD TYPE '5W REQSSTI. S' 1101 OTHER 6' MN SiTST4. aC TYPE L t6 CO COIN. 16' b' RES 16' 30' R/W ea MA •SW^ _ SEE TABLE 4 10 MN SECTION A -A (DRAINAGE SWALE) m SECTION B -B VARIES 1/4' PER FOOL 6' PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE 1/4' PER PROJECTED SIDEWALK GRADE. 6 ' . yam SEE CABLE {' PCR1LAND CEIENT CONCRETE GENERAL NOTES 1. EXPANsai JOINT MATERIAL 911111 BE PLACED N THE COLTER OF ALL DRIVEWAYS OVER 20' N NOM 2. EXPANSON JOINT REQUIRED W POUR INCLUDES ADDITIONAL DRIVEWAY AREA. 1 CONCRETE FOR ORIVEWAYS SUMS BE CLASS 3000 AIR ENTRAINED. ♦. ALL EXTERNAL EDGES TD BE TROWE11E0 BM 1/4' RAOIUS EDGER. S. SIDEWALK TO BE SCCRED EVERY S'. 3/6' EXPANSION JOINT TO BE INSTALLED EACH SUE OF A CURB RETURN AND AT LOCATIONS WHERE SIOEWATH NTERSECTS OTHER SIDEWALKS. ORREWATS AND CURBS B. ME MDTH OF COMMERDAL DRIVEWAYS MAY BE BOER THAN SHORN, F APPROVED BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER. A 1. SEE SHEET A -5 (NTIEEL CHAR FAYPS) S SEE SHEET A -7 (CEMENT CONCRETE APPROACHES) (t' w SECTION A -A (PLANTER STRIP) DIMENSION TABLE SIDEWALK ITO- /FRO YO VATF 'Y RFNA SPOKANE COUNTY APPROVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS OCOVrE yp lOIRIG w M10• A]1' SIW OA IC .26 ' L - F r. -.A'P N , = STANDARD = 6IIRf URBAN DRIVEWAYS - ,SEPARATED SIDEWALKS WA" PM IN JOB# 940ior CC: List Initials nit JUL -15 -96 MON 16:57 r .FFORD CONSULTANTS INC. 509c =42925 P. Job No. 1t I" f € -Ol Transmittal Date 2/1 sl f6 PLEASE FAX TO: Firm T. l . E • �. FAX No. lsc -, 6gY9 Name 3 er-ry Pe Te.r58-n. NOTES: GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. • 2020 E.Springfield Ave, Spokane, WA 99202 • Telephone: (509) 534 -3670 Fax (509) 534 -2925 'a FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Tr FROM: GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Name C r 4n Z C e Ni v 0 5 Total No. of pages transmitted, including cover sheet: 5 JUL -15 -96 MON 16:57 „C\FFORD CONSULTANTS INC. 509!42925 GIFFORD CONSULTANTS. INC. Geotechnical Engineers 2020 E. Springfield • Spokane, WA 99202 • Telephone (509) 534 -3670 • Fax 534 -2925 Dean - Housley Corporation c/o Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. 707 W. Seventh Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 Attn: Mr. Jerzy Peterson, P.E. Project Manager BC% Allen B. Gillord, P.E. DmtiAanl July 12, 1996 RESULTS OF UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TESTING, RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION CONCRETE CORES, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON Attached are the results of measurements and compression testing of concrete cores you provided from the Riveiwalk First Addition site. The testing was accomplished in • general accordance with our proposal of June 19, 1996, which was authorized by Mr. Mark Hancock, on July 1, 1996. The cores, as delivered to our lab, ranged in diameter from 1.73 to 1.74 inches and in length from 2.4 to 5.6 inches. Cores that were sufficiently long to yield a test specimen having a length -to- diameter ratio of about 2 were trimmed and tested for unconfined compressive strength. Of the 37 cores delivered, 25 were tested. E-1718 -01 P. 02 JUL -15 -96 MON 16:58 ; r- [FFORD CONSULTANTS INC. 509F- =42925 Dean Housley Corporation cio Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. July 12, 1996 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions about the results, please let us know. _ Sincerely, GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Allen B. Gifford, P. President Encl: Table 1 - Concrete Core Lengths Table 2 - Concrete Core Compressive Strength Invoice E- 1718 -01 Page 2 P.03 JUL -15 -96 MON 16 :59 cAFFORD CONSULTANTS INC. 509 x 4 2925 TABLE 1 CONCRETE CORE LENGTHS Average Length Before Trimming. Core A_ it 51 OAK (Inches) A / T - 9,g,( 3.6 B �� 8 3.8 2.4 D 3.3 E 3.9 F 3.4 G 3.2 II 3.4 I 4.2 4.0 K 23 5 ,1� �a M 4.0 '7wt� Vet 4 34 V iiimm w' N 4.5 0 3.3 P 3.6 Q 5.3 R 3.4 1 5.2 2 5.4 3 5.3 4 ,. 5.0 5 5.0 6 5.0 7 5.6 4141 e 8 - - 5.0 8 (Alt.) 5.5 9 4.3 (p I444I4A WIUW` 10 5.9 11 5.5 12 - 5.0 13 4.8 14 5.0 15 5.0 16 5.0 17 5.0 18 5.0 E- 1718 -01 P.04 TABLE 2 CONCRETE CORE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH Riverwalk lst Addition Core Weight, g Weight, Ibs. Length Diameter Radius Area Volume Unit Weight Load, Ibs Load, psi Care LID Ratio E 294.5 0.649 3.343 1.730 0.8650 2.351 7.8581 142.77 12900 5488 E 1.93 1 312.1 0.688 3.568 1.730 0.8650 2.351 8.3870 141.76 10680 4543 I 2.06 J 306.4 0.675 3.415 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.0925 144.24 12020 5072 J 1.97 L 301.5 0.665 3.425 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.1162 141.52 14900 6288 L 1.97 M 274.8 0.606 3.201 1.737 0.8685 2.370 7.5853 138.01 14160 5975 M 1.84 N 288.2 0.635 3.336 1.735 0.8675 2.364 7.8871 139.21 11300 4780 N 1.92 O 304.6 0.672 3.405 1.735 0.8675 2.364 8.0502 144.15 13820 5845 Q 1.96 Average 141.67 5427 1 295.4 0.651 3.255 1.732 0.8660 2.356 7.6690 146.74 17300 . 7343 1 1.88 2 300.0 0.661 3.395 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.0451 142.06 17560 7410 2 1.95 3 306.2 0.675 3.420 1.730 0.8650 2.351 8.0391 145.10 18340 7802 3 1.98 4 311.6 0.687 3.460 1.732 0.8660 2.356 8.1520 145.62 18400 7810 4 2.00 5 298.1 0.657 3.341 1.730 0.8650 2.351 7.8534 144.60 21260 9044 5 1.93 6 302.9 0.668 3.310 1.737 0.8685 2.370 7.8436 147.12 19920 8406 6 1.91 7 315.0 0.694 3.444 1.732 0.8660 2.356 8.1143 147.89 17320 7351 7 1.99 8 312.8 0.690 3.429 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.1256 146.65 19100 8060 8 1.97 9 311.0 0.666 3.380 1.740 0.8700 2.378 8.0372 147.41 20520 8630 9 1.94 10 310.1 0.684 3.400 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.0569 146.63 16260 6862 10 1.96 11 , 308.4 0.680 3.306 1.737 0.8685 2.370 7.8342 149.97 17200 7258 11 1.90 12 314.4 0.693 3.411 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.0830 148.18 19140 8077 12 1.96 13 309.6 0.683 3.440 1.738 0.8690 2.372 8.1611 144.52 19240 8110 13 1.98 14 312.7 0.689 3.433 1.730 0.8650 2.351 8.0697 147.62 17500 7445 14 1.98 15 318.8 0.703 3.464 1.740 0.8700 2.378 8.2369 147.44 20640 8680 15 1.99 16 321.0 0.708 3.442 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.1564 149.93 18800 7934 16 1.98 17 306.6 0.676 3.400 1.740 0.8700 2.378 8.0848. 144.47 19500 8201 17 1.95 18 270.4 0.596 2.935 , 1.737 0.8685 2.370 6.9550 148.11 20500 8391 18 1.69 Average k E= 1718- 01' ?' TABLE 2 E 1718 - 01 c r 3 0 z m m m 0 0 0 z 0 c r 1 a z 0) N z 0 N A N N N N 0 0 Project # %W C' Name: k?uerwa-ii- / 51 — C'owwir vz,-h )2r Date: 7 -/- b 1%1 Meeting Q Phone j Person eallingfCelled: t ` !ck` Meeting at Phone No.: Attendees: F °r /ndvk / Ne tt' ) ett') f� Subject: 1�-/. mod,!L d �. �1. J Mam 40)4i' - - s - 5 - 44" loo' 10171- dra-i - / /V -t f;r S op.. 1v�� d • /► 2) %1AW 64 r4 Pod-1444d ) - l,�!�1 (J ldn t c4. ft r 4� no 9 /l o -, — -`r /p %tta, I 1 cut O -inc-it �DKe- 144c2-f ✓ - 4 /eed 10 Duty 4, Y Seale,' l•f/cvs iD ttat XkY% /cfd-(to 1 4JVd1 T cl,vc d f ,/dc-c__ -10 Sfc4/ a h t'.- -At-- nt1IG S f / ?avr'dli vex • /Jett/ 40 tee, wcGdf. • See dite,lied do /SA 14414, /-E zt c� leikkaa -ue_ - i. bwf -cri pone puke - /fC 4 1 2. Cfrus a 145/ /x ua 95% bul l- cu , l/ 5tj &.iVe4• Slw✓&t bee "sz Rotne RNN see. A-- •be44,..1 Gbuvt 1 dac-v.„4.4,,,t,„ • 6. avere lc rems 1-h ne tic k - Puvur 6 --han - ik 6ru14 neAth wweek -c N/ /c4.7h T Y I �1 /�� j _ 4ON pvviots- l/S�+ /lciit! week— • G / .) - 2 i --- it - l e-/- %i Pa/ Wee - Attested By: RECORD OF CONVERSATION itr.: -. .releitirlil, 111,1,t,P.t4 3 iN; f . 1 ' ' ,la* : : 14 9 - ol- 9 dig/Lem/el / 6,eeiev.3 /AK"- /et 9 - "5" -.94/ • . • ../ • !, „ /1 9 - - 9 cl pzg e iv& 5e tht/E• ., 9- u - qt./ " " 5 ,4,77,6za7z.) tile 9 -23 - 941 9-a. - 94 /. •1 ' ' 7,8,4cacze..4.-voj ,, - loAre 777P Oil B4CCE2 . 1 - Z99 4 / /I a/117 l aweie "4417,;M*17 4 -29-1/41 •1 1 , 9 • . /o -S- 0/ 1/ Il /0-5 4 ' /0-6 -94 earn 44 / 440 G/4/6" I/ Pid006 .45,4 4 ,e4c4 /0-7 - 9 / eva.4erae 4ie.,e,c7ze../x/6- &k0 e.,/,v6.- ,../ /4eecie.t/A/6 AO -/" -941 uh47 Z./416 11/406/216fir /0-11'9V 1, / O -N-91 anin" gi,i/o4 Jo -/7 -9e1 • ,, • I -file/ 11 , , /J -/9-91/ , , " eizzeo g.izwilee.loA m ,&61.eant/6 ,t,e14,4,vaerit,(4,ea fr,4en; en/A/7,, • /6- -q4( aria?' ,ealo-.5 /O - N-qii atcxad "'mob n /ort,4-1.006' aaumairr- // • t ,1171o,(1 of , raj eatria to-0)7-91 4/4 resrgo '- ALL .0,454m ft • // - / - 94/ dagoeleig 7t0ie oar ,e€01/7" cere etas /1- 1-9a t ' Aaebtro orazehts eaed / g - 9i/ , .. eaurmeme 9/66/4/6 temaravill" g, u-ii-94 I. ,, fMe/A/O ae ei Maire //-f7 /0 IkvorK airs PLAT NAME f 1„SGRv'�!S: ^.':N (C' TT A 1�� �sLA1L ».S ��tn, �kaA au w.. �" f�� . • a f, : R.- uf4fS.YY!/. k { k k' E / ,�+ LS ' 0' ��0` n. ,, „635brom� <?Y�uwvCCs�r 6R d� 6// Ar 1 :30 LA 4 on si4a p,�fr; V;ilm Ref. inlan.A as p L. a I owar,I Consul. a-n t ra✓;n5 • r - How €.40,4.26 L/s•!< ern CSrC- Polish Suti- L9n iAn.1 nr, Colnra.L pi and kl,, r„, r1. 124 3 rade r > 9STo , or. car Ri r.�✓.r / k6,k 4/a5 Sort WA-6n rirliliwi nr.dn !II . Talker./ • 4n Ulal$ • � 4A1t an.,( .Sal -.J {ss l ;vl % pa 79 4' ? ee, and 4/I his krrtri' r.G tt d,-:,r.2 fl~r - k rn J l,e ,...n ace ;,4 wa M 1, Q n &h 71 4 ,4a J N J . 14 dAri le , i (GSrel r erfrn i nar lm.n tl, /S nvrershi , as,J hn,' 4i0 l-J 4pr. 1 . r 1 Gnil / plum 4 /r l �/ ?! Ahr,. rpfir • tLrrtr an.X GS TL {L/as >5 ka /An ,l..4 Aft r.sr. e,...,•ri Cor poold VI 13 7 -Z 97.37. ) % 1•i 133.396,GA /314 97. > 132.8 e . 1 96•z 7. 7.r h • PLAT NAME June 20, 1996 W.O. No. 96106 Dean- Housley Company 16720 NE 116th Street Redmond, WA 98052 Attn: Mark Hancock Re: Riverwalk 1st (P- 1414A); CONSTRUCTION Evaluation and Certification Program Dear Mark: Over the last several weeks we have discussed several times, the construction inspection and certification program for Riverwalk 1st. These conversations and meetings at IPEC have always discussed the generalities of the program. Presented here is a finalization of the program which we are intending to follow. As of June 12, 1996 this program has been implemented with the coring of the sidewalks on Indiana and Mission Avenues. We are expecting the coring test results sometime this week, however, the preliminary data indicates that the curb and sidewalk nominal dimensions shown on the plans may have not been met. Below is a list of assumptions which were used in delineating the program. If during your review, you feel that you may have information to supplement these assumptions please forward this to our office. ASSUMPTIONS f.2 J - FTC INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. 1. At this point, other than acknowledging that North Idaho marked up a set of prints, we are assuming that no construction inspection took place on site. We are assuming this for Indiana Avenue also, regardless of contractor claims that aSpokane County _ representative approved the subgrade Without written defensible data and information, here say is useless. 2. Our program will be centered around the two instructional letters regarding inspection and certification procedures as outlined by Spokane County, dated August 8, 1995 and June 4, 1996. Copies of these are enclosed. 3. This program, will not evaluate or inspect the water and sewer construction elements as these should have been inspected by Consolidated Irrigation and the Spokane County Sewer Utility respectively. If desired, we will gather pertinent information from either of these two agencies for your records. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509- 458 -6840 • FAX: 509 - 458 -6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208- 765 -7784 • FAX: 208- 769 -7277 Dean Housley Company June 20, 1996 Page 2 4. The primary focus of this program will be the evaluation and reconstruction of an inspection program for both the private and public streets as well as the public and private " drainage facilities so that appropriate certifications can be made to Spokane County for acceptance of the public streets portion. STREET AND STORM DRAINAGE EVALUATION AND CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Streets ELEMENTS A. Subgrade: Perform compaction testing at 200' intervals along Indiana and Mission Avenue as well as one every 500' for the private roads. B. Crushed: Perform compaction testing at 200' intervals along Indiana and Mission Avenue as well as one every 500' for the private roads C. Asphalt: Perform compaction testing at 200' intervals along Indiana and Mission Avenue as well as one every 500' for the private roads OVERVIEW The method for providing the information for A, B, and C is a destructive testing method which will require the Subgrade, Crushed and Asphalt testing to be performed in a process that will allow in place nuclear densometer (nuke test) readings to be taken as each level is peeled back. Additionally, samples will be taken of the crushed rock and subgrade for proctor tests to determine if the appropriate gradation was utilized. SPECIFIC PROGRAM (step by sten anproath) 1. A 4' by 4' square will be painted and delineated on the pavement around the centerline prior to saw cutting. 2. Perform a nuke test to determine the in place density of the existing asphalt surface and take one coring sample from the center of each 4' square prior to removal. This coring will be for pavement depth verification. 3. Cut the 4' by 4' asphalt square out and carefully remove the asphalt, trying not to disturb the underlying crushed rock layer. 4. Perform a nuke test to determine the in place density of the existing crushed rock layer, remove a sample for a proctor test and measure the in place compacted depth. Perform the proctor test and include with results. Dean Housley Company June 20, 1996 Page 3 5. Remove approximate a 2' by 2' square of the crushed rock this will insure that the adjacent roadway subgrade will not be undermined. Perform a nuke test to determine the in place density of the existing subgrade, remove a sample for a proctor test and determine the AASHTO soil classification and/or R -Value test for reference. 6. Replace disturbed subgrade with crushed rock which has been compacted per the roadway section in the approved plans. When the rock compaction is complete a nuke test will be taken prior to asphalt paving. Tack coat all exposed surfaces (including sawcut edges and crushed rock) and replace the removed ACP Class B, to the appropriate depth. Once paved and compacted a nuke test will be performed to verify the density of the asphalt. Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk ELEMENTS A. Cement concrete curb: B. Cement concrete Gutter: C. Cement concrete Sidewalk: Take a coring at appropriate intervals, measure depth and crush for strength. Take a coring at appropriate intervals, measure depth and crush for strength. Take a coring at appropriate intervals, measure depth and crush for strength. OVERVIEW The method for providing the information for A, B, and C is a destructive testing method that will require all cylinder cores tested to be destroyed. The specific objectives are spot thickness checks and compressive strength. All voids created by the coring operation will either be back filled with concrete or a modified cement epoxy mix. This method will not test the voids below the cement element and will only approximate by a stab test the base material compaction. SPECIFIC PROGRAM (step by step approach) 1. As series of paint marks will be placed on both the gutter and sidewalks throughout the project, these marks will be placed at random and should not be any closer than 200' along straight runs At first the testing will only entail the testing of the Indiana Avenue and Mission Avenue improvements. However, in the event that these are determined to be specifically in adequate, additional testing on sidewalks and curbs within the plat may be requested. 2. Take core samples at the locations marked, perform a stab test to determine relative in- situ density, repair the core hole with the appropriate mix, measure each sample for Dean Housley Company June 20, 1996 Page 4 thickness and then mold and break each core for strength. 3. Perform a water test to determine that the curb returns and gutter sections flow as designed and that water enters each respective pond as anticipated. Additionally, this water test will define if there are any low spots or "birdbaths" along the cutter section where water will stand and pond and cause silty deposits in the future. Storm Drainage ELEMENTS A. Swales: Perform an as -built survey for each swale on both private and public roads. B. Ponds: Perform an as -built survey on each pond C. Catch Basins: Perform an as -built survey on each catch basin including pipe IE's. D. Drywells: Perform an as -built survey on each drywell including pipe IE's. E. Pipes: Verify as -built pipe slope and capacity in office for each pipe segment. OVERVIEW The primary method for determining the as -built adequacy for items A through E is via an as- built survey. This survey will provide information for both the analysis and certification/as -built requirements that the County has set. Due to the level of information required to pick up information for the swales, this as-built survey will probably be scoped to encompass certain as- built requirements that the County has set specifically along Mission and Indiana Avenues. SPECIFIC PROGRAM (step by step approach) 1. A complete as-built survey will be scheduled and performed as soon as possible. 2. The results from the as-built survey will be incorporated into a topo plot which will be used to mark up or as-built a set of the existing approved plans to make a set of record drawings. These record drawings then will be used to determine any specific discrepancies and delineate additional drainage construction elements remaining to be constructed or which need to be constructed. 3. After completion of the record drawings, a punch list, will be assembled of those items remaining to be constructed or which need to be constructed prior to certification and acceptance. It can be expected that this entire program will probably take approximately three to six weeks to gather and delineate all of the data required. This information will then be used to revise the first Dean Housley Company June 20, 1996 Page 5 punch list which has been compiled from the original record drawings made by North Idaho and delivered to the County, a copy of which is attached. At this time, we have started several of the elements described above. As of today, we have marked all of the curb and sidewalk coring locations and they have been cored and backfilled. The results from the testing should be in our office within the week. We have also completed the as -built survey and expect the topographic map to be completed by the end of this week or at the latest, the first of next week. Once that has been completed, we will mark up an as -built set of the approved construction drawings in preparation of the certification submittal. We have done nothing to date regarding the asphalt testing on any of the lanes or roads. As you know, we have been waiting to receive the County information on the subgrade. It is my recommendation that if this is not produced by the County by the end of the week, that we schedule the pavement testing for mid -week next week and just complete that portion of the overall program. Please be sure to let me know on this. As noted earlier, attached to this is the initial punch list which will be expanded upon as items progress. Please feel free to mark off any items which you know have been accomplished by Veme and your on -site crew. We will try to update this every couple of days so that a current accounting can be made for progress. If after your review, you feel that we have omitted any critical element or have any questions regarding this program please do not hesitate to call. Sigcerely, In Pacifi Todd R. Whipple, P.E. TRW /tw file enclosure neering Co. Inc. cc: Ed Dean, Dean Housley Company file June 20, 1996 Punch List - Page 2 Done •• 3• V� • .•, f ✓.;:dl -tte x �F, knit x.. 1 u B ...,; uw'.ifi0 .. . i,.. a x J r. ` - ; ... , _, . a E T. L r .. NI JtY. r '. T . , - h.i PunchtL•`r? Item ?Description r�, ter:? ,R. :-_ t r • a w,r�9 , cxm r �€ : }} i ? I ! a r:. _x .: . xy, s. # . i .... �u 3� f f r e, t 7 � . T y.. �� f [y- .y .:... _:...nwL:.w SuG ,. . .. � ....a.iN +'3': .... ' v3.f.. yrrf•iTJft .�..wr].x y y..'v:: �1r4.1 ^�eaiAa�.N.a.• tu "r;;- L ^) L Y , �` � r ��q� r>:;� x a x.:' , s,:': >1Recom dedrR T'. .i4w a r r r rm. �# Q e Y 1 S i. - t 9 i1 +Y: ':'.U rk; �., z'k!' . ru c S ' t ,. G . Y ?. IA.. ' u1 ��L . ..1 T4- ..u•'.t a ".52"�' 1 "1 ri :r �: iryry ���� � P ' , IY • iy L � �� 8:E v ' Sa§..._.......... ��. r � ..��''m�.e,aS::.T,irs:r.J..:�fl 8. Irrigation, hydroseeding and sodding - All of the tract swales and landscaped areas must have these elements included, this also applies to all planting strips and pond areas. Please review the as -built condition with the approved plans, pay special attention to the landscaping and irrigation notes. as 9. EB and WB Tapers at Mission and Harmony, were not constructed. This taper needs to be constructed in accordance with the approved plans. 10. Augusta and Sandusky - It appears that these two stub streets have been constructed short of that shown in the approved plans. Please review the approved plans and construct these to the necessary length. 11. The offsite pond / swale has not been constructed. This item needs to be constructed per the approved plans. 12. The turn -a- round, or hammerhead on McMillan Lane was not constructed. This is a fire department issue and needs to be constructed as shown on the approved plans. 13. Grassy Swale on Barker Road has not been constructed. This item need to be constructed per the approved plans. 14. Per the plans, there are several under drains which have not been constructed as designed. This item need to be constructed per the approved plans. 15. Sidewalk on Mission Avenue constructed west of Harmony on Mission was constructed at the back of curb. The plans indicate a different section for Mission than for Indiana. This curb may be off by as much as 15 feet. This curb needs to be removed and reconstructed as shown in the approved plans, additionally, any swale behind the curb will also need to be constructed. June 20, 1996 Punch List - Page 2 . . � � `- | r - .:, it,w13unaLlost ItemtDescription , ii ... ,.;. 'ix' z,.„, . / ��--------' -- -- �~~^'` � "^=,�== � ` -=��"��`��== � -,- -• mi itrirtrcitifecornmendecl!qemedy ._ ', � Ogmve||a- Based upon a visual i n, it a . rs that several of the proposed d�own||oseenntobe covered upnr not installed. ' .����`�'(� ���� Uncover or install, whichever is required the Check the approved ^ � plans for reference. 2. Pipes - Based upon visual inspection, it appears that there are several pipes which can be it drywell or catch basin. See item no 1. � •3. Swales - Based upon visual inspectin, it appears that theiwale dimensions on the undeveloped and developed lots do not mneet the plan requiomnnents. These swales need to be measured and reconstructed per the approved plans � 4. Cross Gutters - Based upon visual inspection, several of the cross gutters shown in the plans have not been constructed. Construct these elements per the approved plan set If there is no intention to construct theeacrossguMens.oddidona|stunndcsinogena|uu|� tions will be required to resize any and all affected ponds. This could result in ponds on Iots with houses on them being too small and having to be reconstructed. This cou!d also result in an easement modiflcation and could affect the entire lot, especially if a home has already been constructed. 5. 12-inch Ductile Iron Pipe at Indiana between catch basin and swale is flat, or nearly flat and filled parba||ywith dir[ ..,, This pipe must be clear of silt and sand Uleneb�reiLnmustheu|eaned |PEwiUpedbnn ' several ca|ou|aUonnto determine vvhat the reduced pipe slope �has. |fvvo cannot verify that this pipe will carry the designed flows additional construction measures may be required. 6. Drywelis, catch basins and other structures such as curb drops. Are these in the right locations? Several of these ubocturosdo not appear tube000s(ruutud per the approved plans. All structure locations need 1ohe verified and compared tn the upp/« . ved plans This will beanounnp|ished during the'nS:hui|tnurveyby|PE � � 7. The constructed "Keystone" wall does not match the cross-section as shown in the plans. 8dditionu||y the Additionally, end, plans. � |f this wall is not a"kevs�one"vva||uospecm edin�hevva|| Uhencu�nhee�nand manufactures design ' wall, — � ~ � nnanu ouren engnrenunnnnenda�iunoneudtobefomvandudto|PEforreviev"and apprnva|. Additionally, please look at the wall section in the approved plans in regards to the wall designed, they are inconsistent. June 20, 1996 W.O. No. 96106 RivRRw@lk1st Addition - Dean Housley Company Construction Punch List No. 1 • S P- r< A N t3 OFFICE OF.THE COUNTY ENGINEER • Ronald C. Hon .ann, P.E., County Engineer August 8, 1995 Bruce Howard Inland Pacific Engineering Inc 707 West 7th, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Subject: Inspection & Certification of Road and Drainage Facilities Dear Bruce: 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99 260.0170 • (5091 4S6.1finn c R' 'CI pn SEP 11 1995 I. P.E. C. O U N T Y A DIVISIONOF THE PuoI.IC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., D A clarification was requested regarding what the County requires for the inspection, certification and preparation of Record Drawings plans of the construction of road and drainage facilities. Inspection, certification, and Record Drawings are required in accordance with the current Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, Section 9M. construction Site tructi n M uua (M41 -0I) and monitoring, DOT ConstructionManual g material testing, and reporting, need to generally follow the WS A brief, overall description of what needs to be addressed by the sponsor's Engineer for inspection, certification and submitting Record Drawings are listed below. Road onstruction incur r Earthwork -cut. The E .onrto n Engineer needs examine each newly exposed cut as soon as possible after it is opened, an inspection of the cut slopes and ditch cuts to locate any objectionable foundation materials or fain drainage conditions which need to be corrected Objectionable materials arc those having characteristics which ma ca faulty y use an u nstable subgrade. If objectionable materials are found, the Engineer needs to immediately recommend corrective measures and coordinate their efforts with the County. Earthwork- For placement of structural fill under roadways and facilities, the Engineer needs to monitor the compaction material, lift thickness, testing of moisture content and compacted density for each lift, and note compaction equipment used. The maximum density and optimum moisture content shall be determined prior to placement of 01, and relative density of each lift is to be reported by the Engineer through an inspection report. The Engineer shall test for in -place density at a frequency of approximately one test for 5,000 square feet of structural fill surface area Subgrade The subgrade shall be uniformly compacted to the density specified The Engineer shall test for roadway or equivalent. in -place density at a frequency of approximately one test for each 200 linear feet of two -lane cit... 1 -? Letter to Bruce Howard Au; st 8 1995 Page 2' Bases 'Compaction testing of each layer of material is needed. During construction, cach layer of surfacing material shall be checked for compliance with density specifications at the latest time practical before the next layer of material placed. Field tests for each layer placed is to be done at a frequency of approximately one test for each 200 linear feet of two -lane roadway or equivalent, Upon completion of placing and compacting of each surfacing section, and before constriction of the surface treatment or pavement the Engineer shall ascertain the depth of the total surfacing and base course section by checking the depth under each traffic lane at intervals not to exceed 200 linear feet, measured along centerline. General: Pavement The Engineer shall prepare a written record of paving operations, including adequacy of be material, tack coat application, spreading and finishing, and compaction. The Engineer shall submit a report showing how the Contractor conformed to compaction and placement requirements. Concrete Curbs & Sidewalks Thc Engineer shall note what methods were used by the Contractor to insure that the foundation for curbs and gutters were thoroughly compacted and watered prior to concrete placement. The Engineer is to record the type and condition of the formwork as it pertains to specification requirements. The Engineer is to also record concrete placement methods and curing procedures. Recording of the weather conditions during concrete placement is also important. Drainage The Engineer is to go over the project, Particularly during severe storms, closely observing the quantity and action of the storm water runoff to determine sufficiency of the storm drainage system. The meet of curbs, grates and culverts need to be placed at the proper elevation to insure of storm runoff. If underground streams and seepage zones arc encountered, which were not anticipated or accounted for in the design, or if any other portion of the drainage system appears to be inadequate in the opinion of the Engineer, the Engineer shall notify the County, the Sponsor and the Contractor immediately. The Engineer shall diligently coordinate with these various parties in developing mitigative measures to address the problem. For construction of pipes and drainage structures, the Engineer shall check for conformance with the plans and specifications on the condition and methods of the pipe foundation, bedding, backfill and pipe grades. Erosion Control If an erosion control plan has been required for this project, the Engineer shall record what erosion and sedimentation control measures were implemented by the Contractor, and what sequence in the construction process- Note when silt fences, sediment traps/ponds are installed, construction entrances, and how well they are maintained throughout the duration of construction. If • downstream properties is impacted by silt deposition from site construction, the Engineer needs to record when it occurred and what mitigative measures were initiated to correct the problem. The Engineer must see that his inspectors are equipped with the proper tools to test and inspect materials and that arrangements are made to insure that material samples are representative, accurate and complete. It is imperative that the Engineer keep the Contractor informed of test results at all times. If the material being produced does not meet the requirements of the specifications, the Contractor must be informed immediately that is unacceptable so that corrections can be made. The Engineer must keep a record of daily test results. llic Engineer shall Material T etir, Letter to Bruce Howard Au; st 8 1995 conduct sampling and testing as often as necessary each day of construction. Aggregates Gradation and material testing and reporting of the rock material for, conformance with the Specifications is needed for each material used. The Engineer is to watch for segregation of materials during all stages of manufacture, hauling, and placement. Pavements The Engineer shall test for, as a minimum, material gradation, Marshall test of the asphalt, and asphalt content Concrete Curbs & Sidewalks The Engineer shall ascertain that the concrete work meets the requirements of the specifications, including but not limited to testing for compressive strength, air entraimnent, and slump. SLbmittaI and R nortin th Inspection reports, material testing reports, and Record Draw completion of each phase of the ro' Engineer finds the construction work not in conformance with ings are to be submitted to the County upon the the plans and specifications, he shall notify the Contractor and the Sponsor immediately of non- conforming work. In the event the Contractor fails to immediately correct' the defective work, it is the responsibility of the sponsor to rectify the situation. fn the event the Engineer finds the need to revise the plans at the time of construction, he/she shall immediately notify the County of his/her intention, and shall coordinate their efforts with the County, sponsor and the Contractor. Unless there is an immediate danger to life or pro c obtain written the tten acceptance from the Sponsor's Design Engineer of plan changes prior to implementation and shall - 'rward a copy of the approved plan changes and related calculations, to the County Engineer. The inspection reports, material testing reports, and Sponsor's Design Engineer Record Drawings are to be sufficiently complete so as to clearly demonstrate that every aspect of the project is in conformance with the plans and specifications. The Engineer is to submit the reports and plans to the County in an organized and complete manner, with the sponsor's Engineers/Surveyors certification statement The Record Drawings need to reflect what was actual/ horizontal location of avements c Y installed ctw- cd and constructed. Any normal c oin elevations and tolerances, p curbs and Record structures, which are outside of normal construction ces, would need to be identified in the Record Drawings. We hope this information helps clarify what is expected of the sponsor's Engineer for inspection and certification of the constriction project Sincerely, Spokane County Public Wor Bill Johns, P.E. Acting County Engineer Jim Frank - Grccnstonc Corp. Sincerely, Spokane Count Public Works Bill Hemmings, P.E. Development Services Engineer/Manager page 3 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Telephone - (509) 458 -6840 FAX - (509) 458 -6844 • NOTES: p (g ko(Q 441-() Y6 -e /,0540 c, es �. at ker , So d' t ava ski GI/1,6 7.: I • DATE: 1x777 • TO: • COMPANY: IN FAX NUMBER: 4gq o gs1 • FROM: - - . Jeep( I ret INCL. COVER PAGE c eh/ Ce6rG CA c • NUMBER OF PAGES: JOB NUMBER .fir c 16cJ.+ r s o 4-6,4 ac- &eef are. 14" e t,,-c kt&e aktet C4Jfl lJ Lit 6k, . (oat (, C' frutzde 4)-e Ct -t k-c ,. & 40 3 '" (e 4 - / � tax -ekr ra1ic, Pte.S.c P"-e- ka(.eS CV/ Cmn. ) h/r ( 2 4e af'� ro�act -4 Pt &vow lac r - or 1 e 46.e,r Cave Cwtf c/ethic r 15 t z , Qet - ` 3 9 C(0 (R (A,,,./ e (4c. 631 , ,.. a- /s 5 -2 G_s l%,5 r tl _ [ i,vtk- -Cr (j,z r FAX TRANSMISSION 111 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Telephone - (509) 458 -6840 FAX - (509) 458 -6844 ■ NOTES: ■ DATE: 6/7 q6 ■ To: /� `4 RAVE CUP“ 04 (465 ■ COMPANY: c_--r ■ FAX NUMBER: • FROM: J_ 96/66 ■ NUMBER OF PAGES: JOB NUMBER INCL COVER PAGE 2.— l S 5 JL 'a 1� Y6 (� ii Y � [ma - " c bt VLS�t/� A O v La { �a GC OW , �-r a uF o pt rde 0,a/4-ei I di dp,/ - g �6 �s (die- 74.�e) �6c�ttc � /'F I 40 (,{ r t c e GZ -,� I n M 1. ( Sor,c3 A c tt lbt ack c en -ed. fl ccw, rs 61A 4- cores : 1414a e 5`b ales s e cam l . FAX TRANSMISSION 1111 Sae 1 I auowrlr -'� W I 1 14, III X = 51elew.tiL Corte 3 6jj4 %, Cat. I KniEEH uti -11- 1 5 � Cov 1 I LA�ouT 1 1 I - 7/ n ,�vA�� I 1 I • L I o f aetyki \ W 5 I 5 I e7 / 25 I2. ; \ --v 1 _ 1 \ 45 1 1 . 1 11 1 1E/ y A� \ -RA' a' r '' \ 1 c — 16 15 700 901211 O+ air 1 111:c IrMMO PACFIC ENOM EERWQ Al .. m. .lA TJ 1lal 40016 .... ..m. .. t roM -... UU/U4 /af 10:01 S P U XC A N E : {� ] " ' �y j; !' L` O U IV T - y - DIVISION OP ENGINEERING AND ROADS William A. Johns, P.E. County Engineer June 3, 1996 Todd Whipple, P.E. IPEC Gentlemen: o•auu :4Z 9;14/(1 Cvuk f) SUBJECT: P1414A - Riverwalk 2nd Addition Record Drawing Documentation COUNTY FNIfl NEEEKS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORK. DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane. WA 99260 - 0170 • (509) 456.3600 PAX (509) 324 TDD: (509) 324-3166 IQJUU2 /UU3 PM I JOB # X' ys Initials You recently posed some questions regarding documentation of the constructed project, and the finalization of the plat. We are providing these responses: Question #1: IPEC proposes to determine elevations at 100' center line station, curb returns, curb inleu, pipe inverts, and drywell grates. Are other locations needed? Question #2: What is an acceptable deference from the accepted plans before a "substantive" change occurs? Response: Elevations, locations, type of material, etc., should be verified for compliance to the accepted plans as construction proceeds. Elements which do not comply with the plans should be brought to the County Engineer's attention, accompanied by an analysis for impacts to such requirements as safety, drainage performance, maintainability, life -cycle performance, etc., for the County Engineer's concurrence. If there is no impact, then a "substantive change probably does not occur, and re- approval of the plans is probably not needed. If there is an impact, then approval of a plan change is needed; the plans would then need to be re- approved by the Design Engineer, and re- accepted by the County . Engineer. At this point in the project, a list of non - conforming elements should be tabulated, accompanied by an impact analysis. Where the County Engineer concurs that there is not an impact to the project, the.as- constructed condition can be noted on the plans: without processing a plan change. Where there are impacts to the project, then these could be addressed as a single . plan change. Todd Whipple, P.E. P1414A - Riverwalk 2nd Addition Record Drawing Documentation June 3, 1996 Page 2 of 2 Question #3: In order w finalize the plat, will the County Engineer accept a surety for the construction & repair of the landscaping/ maintenance /irrigation system of the 208 swales? This is proposed so that the Developer does nor have to construct the males once to get County acceptance for finalization, and then again to repair any damage from the home builders prior to actual establishment of the roads for maintenance by the Cou Question N4: In order to finalize the plat, will the County. Engineer accept the construction of Indiana Avenue in this phase, prior to accepting the portion of Indiana constructed in phase 1; provided that the Developer posts a surety a bond for the maintenance & repair of this road until after the homebuilders are completed with the lots fronting on Indiana? This is proposed so that any repairs necessary to allow the County to accept this portion of Indiana for maintenance could be assured. Response: As of today, there has been no change in the County Engineer's position that the public road and drainage facilities serving this project need to be constructed and inspected, and both the physical construction of the facilities, and the construction documentation of the facilities needs to be accepted by the County Engineer's Office prior to. Final Plat Approval. There has been no determination as to what options, if any, would be acceptable to allow Final Plat Approval before the road and drainage facilities are completed. We trust this response answers your questions. If you have further questions in this matter please contact Ed Parry at 456 -3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, w / Act A. P. E. Spokane County Engineer . • cc: project file reviewer Spokane County Public Works Director: Dennis Scott, P.B. Spokane County Engineer's Office: Bill Henunings, P.E.; Ed Parry, P.E. Jim Radice, P.E.; Terry Lightfoot Developer: Ed Dean, Dean Houscly - Bellevue (via fax) Mark Hancock, Verne Jacobsen, Dean Housely - Spokane (via fax) Lei UUJ /UUJ May 17, 1996 IPE W.O. # 96106 Dean Housley Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 Attn: Ed Dean Dear Ed: RE: Riverwalk 1st Addition (PE- 1414 -81) Construction Verification and Certification I am writing this letter to confirm and clarify the engineering services requested by Mark Hancock and Verne Jacobsen of your office. We have opened a new job number (96106) Riverwalk 1st Addition Construction Inspection at their request. The time billed to this project will be complete on a time and materials basis for verification and certification of the street and drainage facilities, as well as prepare post construction drawings as required by Spokane County for "acceptance" of the Phase 1 construction plans. The attached letter dated August 8, 1995 should be used as an outline for the scope of work to be performed, but may not include all necessary construction inspection items required by Spokane County. We will continue to work with Verne and Mark and utilize their assistance to maintain costs on this project. I have also included a copy of our work authorization including our hourly billable rates for your information. Please consider this letter authorization to commence work by signing at the bottom of this page. We will not begin any work on this project until authorization is received. If you have questions concerning any of these items, please give me a call at our office. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering Company Bruce A. Howard, E.I.T. Project Manager enc. cc: file Mark Hancock Offirel,inrraht96106u INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509.458 -6840 • FAX: 509. 458 -6844 5'.- 6(.-ry i4 S poteNt.`z. L . P t �� 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208.769 -7277 MAY 2 1996 C ara � � i k. GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers E.2020 Springfield Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534 -3670 IN INSPECTION REPORT To: Inland Pacific Engineering 707 West 7 Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Attn: Mr. Bruce Howard SUBJECT : Concrete Testing (Gutter Crossing) ❑ MEMORANDUM Day: Thursday Date: 5 -28 -97 Project: Riverwalk 1" Addition County Permit No.: Project Address: Riverwalk Ln. Spokane, WA 1. At the request of Bruce Howard, of Inland Pacific, I visited the project Thursday, 5- 28 -97, to test concrete placed for the gutter crossing at the intersection of Indiana and McMillan. 2. I arrived at 9:30 A.M.. The weather was sunny and 70 degrees Fahrenheit. 3. The contractor was in the process of placing mix #3132, 5.75 -sk, 3000 PSI concrete into the gutter crossing forms. 4. I tested the slump and air content of the concrete. Field test results are as follows: Slump Air Entrainment Test 68s4 5.00 in. 5.0% Specficatlon. 7 inch maximum 4.5 % -7.5% 5. I made one set of four compressive strength test cylinders. 6. I reported the results of my field testing to Mr. Bruce Howard. 7. I departed the site at 1 1:00 A.M.. By Reviewed By: Copies to: Dean Hc(ylley Co. i No. E 2197 -33 Memo /Report No. 1 • Page 1 of 1 p tq r Vi- :11f04 CC: ! Et! - ials PROJECT: GCI JOB NO.: PROJECT ADDRESS: CITY, STATE: DATE OF REPORT: Notes: (_. y FORD CONSULTANTS, GEUTECHNICAL ENGINEERS E. 2020 Springfield Ave. Spokane, WA 99202 15091 5343670 SAMPLING AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT Riverwalk 1st 2197 -33 Indiana off Barker Rd. Spokane, WA 5 -28 -97 SAMPLING DATA (ASTM C 31) BUILDING PERMIT NO.: GENERAL CONTRACTOR: SUBCONTRACTOR: WEATHER AT TIME OF SAMPLING: AMBIENT TEMPERATURE: Winkler Conc. MATERIAL SAMPLED: SAMPLED BY: LOCATION OF PLACEMENT: SPECIFIC SAMPLE LOCATION: SPECIMEN TYPE: Concrete C. Knapp Gutter Crossing W. Part of Gutter Crossing 6" x 12" cylinder SUPPLIER: MIX NO.: SACK CONTENT: TYPE CEMENT: MAX. AGG. SIZE: DESIGN STRENGTH, psi: ADMIXTURES ADDED AT ADMIXTURES ADDED AT SITE: Central Pre -Mix 3132 5.75sk 1A 3/4 3000 DATE SAMPLED: 5 -28 -97 TOTAL YDS. THIS POUR: YDS. BATCH / CUMULATIVE: DELIVERY TICKET NO.: BATCH TIME / END TIME / AGE ALLOWABLE WATER: WATER BEFORE/AFTER SAMPLE OBTAINED FROM: 19 19 64280 9:30 5 10:3 19 Truck Chute 604 W/C RATIO: FIELD TESTS SLUMP, in. IASTM C 1431: CONC. TEMP., °F (ASTM C 10641: AIR CONTENT, % IASTM C 2311: UNIT WEIGHT, pcf IASTM c 1381: SPEC. 7 max 55 -90 4.5 -7.5 ACTUAL 5.0 5.0 Abbreviations: AEA Air Entraining Admixture RRA -Water Reducer =High Range W ter Reducer (Superplasticizer) FR -Fiber Reinforcement CA■Calcium Chloride Accelerator NCA =Non - Chloride Accelerator FA - Ash n.s. =not supplied n.r. =no recorded n.t.= not tested COMPRESSION TEST DATA (ASTM C'39) Sunny 70 LABNO. FIELD NO DATE RECEIVED DATE TESTED AGE, DAYS TESTED BY TOTAL LOAD, LBS. SPECIMEN AREA, SQ. IN. STRENGTH, PSI 97 -0380 0381 0382 383 21970528A B C D 5 -29 6-4 6-25 6 -25 7 ' 28 28 JLT JLT JLT 86,480 I 28.42 3,040 113,740 117,540 28.49 3,990 28.63 4,105 REQUIRED AVERAGE 28 -DAY STRENGTH, PSI: 3,000 1ACTUAL AVERAGE 28 -DAY STRENGTH, PSI: 4,045 D MEETS SPECIFICATION ❑ FAILS SPECIFICATION Technician Signature SOIL CHEMI -CAL ANALYSES SOIL MOISTURE NITROGEN suitor S PPm Organic Manor Per cent Phosphorous P Mai Polasslum K poi Callum Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Toth/ Bases Clem Exchange Percent Bass Saturation 1._ 0 Field Capacity A.so.us nmw NO3 pPrrt NOS NN4 IL S. P o Acre m••. esr ienwa saw Bac tton inert. per t tb grams 4.48 20.7 0 2 3 4 5 MINOR ELEMENT ANALYSIS DEPTH FOOT pH Sobable San m,Mslcn Boron B Zino Zn Manganese Mn Capper Cu In Iron Fe EH ory with acid Parts Per Milton • ppn TOTAL 0. 00 0 0 1 Estimated Nungen R base Estimated Total Nitrogen fromOrgani Manor: Available to Crop: Last Yeats Crap: 2 3 Flold No.: Fertilizer: Comnann and Rocom ondatiora: NORTHWEST .x cultiunG eonsa:itan e, 2545 West Falls • Kennewick. WA 99336 (509) 783 -7450 FAX (509) 783 -5305 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 W 7TH AVE SUITE 200 SPOKANE, WA Reid Name: Pond C Crop Year: 9055 REPORT NO.: Grower: Sorpler: Crap to be Grown: Daze Ropoved ands Sampled: 6226 — Page 1 of 2 Yieb Goal 2/19/97 ✓. aiLlt ar" Northwest Agricultu al Con ultants, Inc. SOIL CHEMICAL ANALYSES DEPTH FOOT • SOIL MOISTURE NITROGEN Sulfur S Wm o Manor Parom Phosphorous P ppm am K Pdselv P Pm Calcium Ca Mapnoslurt Mg Sodium Na Total Bases b Exchange f ,,rly Porwm Base Saturnian •a n.id -. c.saab "Sea* bid., N93 ppm Nre Moue anramn. Meat. srremm trop. per 100 Brans Lbs lbs. Per Acre I 4.93 22.9 0 2 3 4 5 MINOR ELEMENT ANALYSIS DEPTH FOOT pH Solvable �� Boron g Zinc Zn Manganese Mn Capper Cu Iron Fe E awesome with acid 5 Pans Per Milos • ppn TOTAL O O 0 1 2 - Enimafod Nitrogen R lease Estimated Taal Nitrogen Irom Organic Manor: Avallabl to Crop: Lan Year's tree: 3 Fern l Fenaizor: Commons and Recommendations: NORTHWEST 5� 2545 West Falls • Kennewick, WA 99336 (509) 783 -7450 FAX (509) 783 -5305 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 W 7TH AVE SUITE 200 SPOKANE, WA Flotl Name: Pond M Crop Yoa: 9055 tree to be Grown: Dam Redowd and/or Sarped: REPORT NO.: 6226 — Page 2 of 2 Grover: Sanger: YmM Goal: Nort west Agricultural Cons tants, Inc. 2/19/97 GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. cc" Zq 199 Geotechnical Engineers E.2020 Springfield `^ Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534 -3670 X INSPECTION REPORT ❑ MEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering 707 W. 7 Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Attn.: Mr. Jerry Peterson SUBJECT : Concrete Testing Upon the request of Mr. John McKervey (Inland Pacific Engineering), I made a site visit on Thursday, 12- 12 -96, between 1:45 PM and 2:15 PM. The purpose was to test and inspect concrete placed for the gutter crossing at the intersection of Indiana Ave. and McMillan Ln. The weather was cloudy and 33 degrees fahrenheit. Project No. E- 1718 -03 Memo /Report No. 1 Day: Thursday Date: 12 -12 -96 Project: Riverwalk 1' Addition County Permit No.: Project Address: McMillan Lane and Indiana Ave. Approximately 14 cu. yd. of mix #3132, 5.75 SK, 3000 PSI concrete, with a target concentration of 1 .5% calcium chloride, was placed for the gutter. The gutter crossing was reinforced with a wire mat. The calcium chloride placed into the concrete mix at the batch plant, ordered by the contractor, exceeds the minimum specified percent of chloride ions specified for reinforced concrete (1996 -WSDOT 6- 02.3(2); The total Chloride ion content of the mixed concrete shall not exceed 0.1 percent of the cementitious material for reinforced concrete). Based on ticket batch weights, we calculate the Chloride ion conte 0.6% of the cementitious material. Field test results were as follows: Slump = 3 in. (Spec. Slump = 7 in. max.) Concrete Temperature = 60 Deg. (Specified Temp. Range 60 deg. - 90 deg.) Air Content = 4.7% (Specified Air Content Range: 4.5% - 7 %) The contractor and Mr. John McKervey were notified of my test results and observations. By Page 1 of 1 GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. 10 96 Geotechnical Engineers Ora ( 1- v 2020 E. Springfield • Spokane, WA 99202 • Telephone (509) 534 -3670 • Fax 534 -2925 c • August 27, 1996 Dean - Housley Corporation c/o Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. 707 W. Seventh Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 Attn: Mr. Todd Whipple, P.E. RESULTS OF MEASUREMENTS AND BULK SPECIFIC GRAVITY TESTING OF ASPHALT CONCRETE CORES, RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON Attached are the results of measurements and bulk specific gravity testing of asphalt concrete cores you provided from the Rivenvalk •First Addition site. The testing was accomplished in general accordance with our confirming letter of August 12, 1996, which you authorized on August 16, 1996. The cores each approximately 3.7 inches in diameter, were delivered to our office by Spokane Concrete Cutting on August 6, 1996. Our work included measuring the length of each core to the closest 0.1 inch and conducting bulk specific gravity testing (ASTM D 2726) on each of them. Results are summarized on the attached Table 1. We appreciate the opportunity to be 'of service to you 011 this project. If you have any questions about the results, please let us know. Sincerely, GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Grant R. Cummings, P.E., P.G. Senior Engineer Encls: Table 1 Allen B. Gifford, P.E. President E- 1718 -02 PM CC: List ir:. TABLE 1 Bulk Core Specific Number Gravity Density (pcf) Length (in.) 1 2.37 147.9 • 3.4 2 2.21 137.9 3.4 3 2.32 144.8 3.2 4 2.32 144.8 2.8 5 2.33 145.4 2.8 6 2.37 147.9 3.0 7 2.29 142.9 • 2.8 8 2.35 146.6 3.4 E- 1718 -02 GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers 2020 E. Springfield • Spokane, WA 99202 • Telephone (509) 534 -3670 • Fax 534 -2925 Dean - Housley Corporation c/o Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. 707 W. Seventh Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, Washington. 99204 Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson, P.E. Project Manager EC% July 12, 1996 RESULTS OF UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TESTING, RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION CONCRETE CORES, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON E- 1718 -01 Attached are the results of measurements and compression testing of concrete cores you provided from the Riverwalk First Addition site. The testing was accomplished in general accordance with our proposal of June 19, 1996, which was authorized by Mr. Mark Hancock, on July .1, 1996. The cores, as delivered to our lab, ranged in diameter from 1.73 to 1.74 inches and in length from 2.4 to 5.6 inches. Cores that were sufficiently long to yield a test specimen having a length -to- diameter ratio of about 2 were trimmed and tested for unconfined compressive strength. Of the 37 cores delivered, 25 were tested. Dean Housley Corporation E- 1718 -01 c/o Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. Page 2 July 12, 1996 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions about the results, please let us know. Sincerely, GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Allen B. Gifford, P. President Encl: Table 1 - Concrete Core Lengths Table 2 - Concrete Core Compressive Strength Invoice TABLE 1 CONCRETE CORE LENGTHS Average Length Before Trimming Core (Inches) A 3.6 B 3.8 C 2A D 3.3 E 3.9 F 3.4 G 12 ... H 3.4 I 4.2 J 4.0 K 2.7 L 4.6 M 4.0 N 4.5 O 3.3 P 3.6 Q 5.3 R 14 1 5.2 2 5.4 3 5.3 4 5.0 5 5.0 6 5.0 7 5.6 8 5.0 8 (Alt.) 5.5 9 4.3 10 5.9 11 5.5 12 5.0 13 4.8 14 5.0 15 5.0 16 5.0 17 5.0 18 5.0 E- 1718 -01 TABLE 2 CONCRETE CORE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH Riverwalk 1st Addition Core Weight, g Weight, lbs. Length Diameter Radius Area Volume Unit Weight Load, lbs Load, psi Core L1D Ratio E 294.5 0.649 3.343 1.730 0.8650 2.351 7.8581 142.77 12900 5488 E 1.93 I 312.1 0.688 3.568 1.730 0.8650 2.351 8.3870 141.76 10680 4543 I 2.06 J 306.4 0.675 3.415 1.737 0.8685 2.370 ' 8.0925 144.24 12020 5072 J 1.97 . L 301.5 0.665 3.425 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.1162 141.52 14900 6288 L 1.97 M 274.8 0.606 3.201 1.737 0.8685 2.370 7.5853 138.01 14160 5975 M 1.84 N 288.2 0.635 3.336 1.735 0.8675 2.364 7.8871 139.21 11300 4780 N 1.92 Q 304.6 0.672 3.405 1.735 0.8675 2.364 8.0502 144.15 13820 5845 Q 1.96 Average 141.67 5427 1 295.4 0.651 3.255 1.732 0.8660 2.356 7.6690 146.74 17300 7343 1 1.88 2 300.0 0.661 3.395 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.0451 142.06 17560 7410 2 1.95 3 306.2 0.675 3.420 1.730 0.8650 2.351 8.0391 145.10 18340 7802 3 1.98 4 311.6 0.687 3.460 1.732 0.8660 2.356 8.1520 145.62 18400 7810 4 2.00 5 298.1 0.657 3.341 1.730 0.8650 2.351 7.8534 144.60 21260 9044 5 1.93 6 302.9 0.668 3.310 1.737 0.8685 ' 2.370 7.8436 147.12 19920 8406 6 1.91 7 315.0 0.694 3.444 1.732 0.8660 2.356 8 :1143 147.89 17320 7351 7 1.99 8 312.8 0.690 3.429 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.1256 146.65 19100 8060 8 1.97 9 311.0 0.686 3.380 1.740 0.8700 2.378 8.0372 147.41 20520 8630 9 1.94 10 310.1 0.684 3.400 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.0569 146.63 16260 6862 10 1.96 11 308.4 0.680 3.306 1.737 0.8685 2.370 7.8342 149.97 17200 7258 11 1.90 12 314.4 0.693 3.411 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.0830 148.18 19140 8077 12 1.96 13 309.6 0.683 3.440 1.738 0.8690 2.372 8.1611 144.52 19240 8110 13 1.98 14 312.7 0.689 3.433 1.730 0.8650 2.351 8.0697 147.62 17500 7445 14 1.98 15 318.8 0.703 3.464 1.740 0.8700 2.378 8.2369 147.44 20640 8680 15 1.99 16 321.0 0.708 3.442 1.737 0.8685 2.370 8.1564 149.93 18800 7934 16 1.98 17 306.6 0.676 3.400 1.740 0.8700 2.378 8.0848 144.47 19500 8201 17 : 1.95 18 270.4 0.596 2.935 1.737 0.8685 2.370 6.9550 148.11 20500 8391 18 1.69 Average 146.67 7934 TABLE 2 E- 1718 -01 STA. OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. TAIL/Cm" - ) I Lr -143.5 q 2 0 n/100$'\ kw' t o can E l y rt 1gZ n 9 - is Cr 142.4% - ? 00 Ul 13 2-f 142. -1- ql. 91. 4- 142 • S 4 Lt ) 2 Lr 147 1 qs 4 3(0 W 147 Ielft A 4501 vJ 950 W R rr-1 1413. ( q S, D 144.0 145,. 000' ul q 1 7, !42..C? q l' 8 ( 13. ;5 142. AVG. )44,o '42.3 STA- OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. TAIL/Cm" - 1 3 1-- Plc.? 1 uC c 9 - is Cr 142.4% - 2rd w 12.7 1 4 91. 4- 2c-p IA) 4 Lt 141. Q 1_ N 147 4501 vJ 4 Rt 145'7 c 3 ;! 144.0 Cs 00 w' 12 t -r 145 ( 13. ;5 . 144.gf AVG. 143.7 '13. D 14`11 214 H1 '. Fly< Z-1j 2 4: F%c) N' 7c4 Nvc ?On Nn 240 z V 41 ■ /- 7 : INLAND ASPHALT CO. ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMPACTION REPORT CONTRACT IAC GAUGE 2-4A PROJECT NO. NO. 04g3/ NO. Z ENGINEER SECTION 1 /14 -i lc - T Mb i ,ih REMARKS: 1 F r- S r5 ra rt C— REMARKS: ' INSPECTOR , q TREET INSPECTOR ROLLER CODE: SDV = SINGLE DRUM VIBRATORY TS = TANDEM STEEL DOV = DOUBLE DRUM VIBRATORY 3WS = 3 WHEEL STEEL P = PNEUMATIC ST& TO STA. TONS 40a •r MB THICK 2. CLASS B, 0,�F, G LANE' T.I OR'rRTJ; NB, SB OTHER lL// CONTROL LOT NO LEVEUNG STD. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT AIR 4,o GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR STA. TO STA. CONTROL LOT NO. TONS 4 o0 ACP , ATB THICK .1" CLASS B, 0, E, F, LANE_ LT. OR RT.i; EB? NB, SE OTHER' LEVEUNG WEARING L� STD. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT DISTRIBUTION: WHITE • FILE CANARY - SUPT. PINK • O.A. GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR // -f- fC DATE WEARING RICE DENSITY , r r S 2�di . • CONTRACTOR RICE DENSITY 1 S • AIR ..0 PAGE 1 OF t PAGES. IA-6 REV. 6/89 STA OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. �Ciayvaerwt :S C7' 142.-3 142.7 Z, 9Z l 1 A 2r 643. ` qz .6- 14z. 6, /` 7' L1 142. /4z . 4- 92. o 6' e 14,• q qlO 142.5 4 L-' 143.4 q2- /4Z. / . AVG. /42.- C 92. !. /Ais .2g a-/vs 2e /rs-s143 .7 z F,-0 INLAND ASPHALT CO. ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT.COMPACTION REPORT - CONTRACT 'IAC GAUGE PROJECT NO. - NO 6 04 3 1 1 NO. 24 a s ENGINEER 2 ruu�L IL -?`pa1UCfe tIim lig r: -+ (a1 vnti ZD ) SECTION E p'Z REMARKS: IV NI/FEZ/1/6 r REMARKS' SDV = SINGLE DRUM VIBRATORY DDV = DOUBLE DRUM VIBRATORY P = PNEUMATIC 1-/.? M STA. AVG. OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. ROLLER CODE: GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR l'c'ESL/ T,5 .o 25/ 1.2 / DN PRS PAilit* 0<IAJDr7YAl4l 12•:1 TS = TANDEM STEEL. 3WS = 3 WHEEL STEEL STA TO STA- CONTROL LOT NO. TONS 24o CP / ATB THICK 2 _ CLASS B. 0, E. F. G .!!� L A N E a Y B NB, SB OTHER LEVELING STD. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT WEARING L STA TO STA DATE RICE DENSITY /,S a•S AJR Sty O CONTROL LOT NO TONS ACP ATB THICK CLASS B. D. E. F, G LANE: LT. OR RT. ; EB, W8, NB, 58 OTHER LEVEUNG STD. DENSITY .ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR DISTRIBUTION: WHITE - FILE CANARY - SUPT. PINK •" O.A. WEARING RICE DENSITY AIR INSPECTOR STREET INSPECTOR CONTRACTOR ? PAGE f I. OF / PAGES. IA-6 REV. 6/89 v ER4 )Ot, ' can her: 5 C 9 ff R co Pn�jcct Nu.: .S oY /6 - //a Dane: _2 ?s— ilt of Week: /K O AI Approved Plans on Site: ❑ Yes BI All items observed appear to be in accordance with approved plans and specifications: ❑ Yes ❑ No l 6L Nc, E) Location: O .4MP `-0 C) Items Observed or Tested: D) Attached Report: ❑ Footings ❑ Columns ❑ Walls Soils ❑ Other DAILY FIELD REPORT ❑ Auger Cast Piles ❑ Structural Slab ❑ Slab-on-Grade ❑ Beams re) ,R AR II'E y2 ❑ Concrete ❑ Mortar ❑ Asphalt _ -Soils ❑ Other S On (73 9 ❑ Rester! ❑ Grout ❑ Structural Steel ❑ Fireproofing �R s nO, F) Comments: fIRR) tf / J 4PY K c . /7 t ? / . PEW S°kwF - 4. 0 d s / ^ 7i0 Xhers�lrArt �c/P/ ycgc r GE //14L /TLl CC�A1 P /4J,2j34 p i45 pN141_7 - OA) S /TE rALE TbLD 111E 7H / t--77-/F PR CrecR Tok 77/C 12.8 r wpc) C )9- ! 3 `f 6 Cc)/v/ffi c 7 od f' i R IUD 0/I / e c' /9- / oAl_ w / TH Al e) c/ i/2_ s F l/ cG , r/US r9' R6 PORT "co R /2 4779, Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road. Suite 5N, Spokane. WA 9920o (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 591.2012 Function Hours Code Miles R Code . 3 3 Total Expenses /00 AKE Code i97 �� Z 23 F' lepresentative: ` Signature: a.i., . v ER4 )Ot, ' can her: 5 C 9 ff R co Pn�jcct Nu.: .S oY /6 - //a Dane: _2 ?s— ilt of Week: /K O AI Approved Plans on Site: ❑ Yes BI All items observed appear to be in accordance with approved plans and specifications: ❑ Yes ❑ No l 6L Nc, E) Location: O .4MP `-0 C) Items Observed or Tested: D) Attached Report: ❑ Footings ❑ Columns ❑ Walls Soils ❑ Other DAILY FIELD REPORT ❑ Auger Cast Piles ❑ Structural Slab ❑ Slab-on-Grade ❑ Beams re) ,R AR II'E y2 ❑ Concrete ❑ Mortar ❑ Asphalt _ -Soils ❑ Other S On (73 9 ❑ Rester! ❑ Grout ❑ Structural Steel ❑ Fireproofing �R s nO, F) Comments: fIRR) tf / J 4PY K c . /7 t ? / . PEW S°kwF - 4. 0 d s / ^ 7i0 Xhers�lrArt �c/P/ ycgc r GE //14L /TLl CC�A1 P /4J,2j34 p i45 pN141_7 - OA) S /TE rALE TbLD 111E 7H / t--77-/F PR CrecR Tok 77/C 12.8 r wpc) C )9- ! 3 `f 6 Cc)/v/ffi c 7 od f' i R IUD 0/I / e c' /9- / oAl_ w / TH Al e) c/ i/2_ s F l/ cG , r/US r9' R6 PORT "co R /2 4779, Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road. Suite 5N, Spokane. WA 9920o (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 591.2012 Cene Contractor: i. n / ` /'� � �1— l f r l r 0 Superintendent: yf U "7 H N Earth.. ark Contractor: Foreman: Test Number Test Location Elev Pnnmr Probe Numher Depth Test Moist Content % Tea Dry Density pct Percent Compaction Remarks ( /00 FROM I=l)'tr Rn56 ( /0 ' mi l. 9 !z 5` 7 z- / rn ' Sfl. a F / i f / 0 ?, ? S 9? 3 /Sn" EA STa� 7_ ./ /o " R 3 / /z A, 4 9 / FIELD DENSITY TEST REPORT Report No. S/ S P roject. Q /`` /� / /j �J /�/� (/ n ,m; `1/ I /6/I w/Lic ( /7/7 1 /1 �: K r ?o 1 Project No.:so Y/6 ,, —7_ 2 51_9r Day of Week Weather: SC/9nQ'e/? Tea Method: / � D // rcnlln I NUCer L, a on of Fill: OFF /? A/(./ P re �� (, Soil Description i&ts COURSE Maximum Dry Density /3 ,L0 Optimum Moisture Content Method Standard /Modified Proctor Number I :presentative 7 - I Signature J4 Pa Z Z- ----- Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N, Spokane, WA 99206 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 891 -2012 -- 7-\\ \ - \\ 11I 11111 I ITT \\ _ \\ - _ \:)\ 1111 P:i F 9 1111 - 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 n w Q 0 w 140 135 0 0 130 0 En 125 0 120 W 0 115 0) 0 0 110 0 105 100 95 0 90 85 80 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 WATER CONTENT (PERCENT) PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk PROJECT NO: SO416 -0110 DATE: July 24, 1995 SAMPLE LOCATION: Unknown. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION: Light brown coarse sand with gravel. TEST PROCEDURE: ASTM 0 -1557, METHOD: C, Modified MOISTURE CONTENT: 6.0% DRY DENSITY: 139.5 PCF REFERENCE NO.: SL1184 REMARKS /DEVIATIONS: PROCTOR TEST RESULTS HCI Howard Consultants, Inc. PLATE CHECKED BY / Pr+'Net: ! / eirc,(2. ( J 7E? Project No.:$ 6 / /`i. ©/7 0 •Address: /� ! Date: 7 -t 9 ' n // ,/ . e :oher: V / Vim/ /5 /� '�! Day of week: ,1t7 A) Approved Plans on Site: ❑ Yes ❑ No C) • ❑ • Items Ohscn el or Tested: Footings ❑ Auger Cast Piles Columns • Structural Slah Walls • Slab-on-Grade Soils • Beams Other 0) ❑ • ❑ gi-Soils • Attached Report: Concrete • Rested Mortar • Gram Asphalt • Structural Steel • Fireproofing Other Lit All items observed appear to be in accordance with approved plans and specifications: ❑ Yes ❑ No /n � n j( �� nn /// p E) Location: O/7 . I AFt r0 ,R ITX1"').Yi? /W . 6}I 57i Wd/sy 44 M o c TE,Q r¢,OD i l�/�S . Ai o ff /C C ,C o,C W57 77/ 9r,—. roc/, 0E") /7/C5 /Rip/(.00 4 0 C/ O,UY ('o 17; A) 0 ez- .2 /DcOf /D/L/c7cQ •cL / I L7) n EtS/ Ty R EPOSl7` A O/ A04.739 -. 12 Co 479 Kit 9 / LL D Sr, C A9D 0/] Rc$OcrJ a, PADcI Sur G/O oAlp (- Cc f1ttY vE/ZY Function Hours Code Miles CC Total Expenses Code .53 ' Z 2z / 3 3 3 4)47 - - 6 7 -'' RepreseniativeZgC /jJ /j� Signature: A ( � _ I Pace 1 of �' 0 • DAILY FIELD REPORT 5 00 1 5y (�t� Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N- Spokane. WA 99 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (5091 891 -2012 Fi Comments: )90 /(1&/, A!ii , 5Poir< rd R v 7 C Ai o, C C'oOS2 cjcJ-g 4 rncz' 7' /�t�l c'-o & Function Hours Code Miles CC Total Expenses Code .53 ' Z 2z / 3 3 3 4)47 - - 6 7 -'' RepreseniativeZgC /jJ /j� Signature: A ( � _ I Pace 1 of �' 0 • DAILY FIELD REPORT 5 00 1 5y (�t� Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N- Spokane. WA 99 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (5091 891 -2012 0 • DAILY FIELD REPORT 5 00 1 5y (�t� Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N- Spokane. WA 99 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (5091 891 -2012 DATE REPORTED: July 5, 1995 DATE RECEIVED: June 8, 1995 SPECIMEN: Concrete Riverwalk MIX NO.: 7906 Spokane, Washington LOCATION: Curb on north side, approximately 125' east of Barker Road. TEST METHODS: ASTM C -1064, C -231 TAG: 395475 AIR TEMP: 43 °F TRUCK: 5164 MIX TEMP: 59 °F TIME: 6:25 pm ENTRAINED AIR: 5.2% LABORATORY NUMBER 1127(A) 1127(B) 1127(C) / DATE CAST (ASTM C -31, C -172) 06/07/95 06/07/95 06/07/95 DATE TESTED (ASTM C -39) 06/14/95 07/05/95 07/05/95 AGE AT TEST, days 7 28 28 SLUMP, inches (ASTM C -143) 1; 1; 1 DIMENSIONS, inches 6 x 12 6 x 12 6 x 12 AREA SQ., inches 28.26 28.26 28.26 APPARENT FRACTURE TYPE Cone Shear Cone MAXIMUM LOAD, pounds 102,000 126,000 129,000 ULTIMATE STRENGTH AS TESTED, psi 3605 4455 4560 REQUIRED 28 DAY STRENGTH, psi 3000 3000 3000 MEETS FAILS TO MEET NO STRENGTH CAST BY CAST BY SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS HCI OTHERS GIVEN / it )PY TO: TRANSMITTAL TO: Ed Dean Construction c/o KC Construe:tion PO Box 1455 Hayden, ID 83835 HCI Howard Consultants, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers & Geologists N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N, Spokane, WA 99206 509-891-1901 Fax 509-891-2012 Project No. SO416 -0110 Compression Test: ASTM C -39 Rcpon No. 1574 t Pngeet: �!) / ,��'(i. ?/')L{( - /4A3 P PFR FOP /WED TESTS 0 A A 5P//1 - Cre SFE Project No.: SOy/ S D //6 1 IJress: vVcatner: f).9►?!A/ 5/1 7 PARFE2 dAr» 72wPFR1p -7 &S Date: — /g.- 9s C/' 00 . 07 Miles Day of week: / cc/ .A) Approved Plans on Site: C) Items Observed or Tested: / /t 20 D) Attached Report: ❑ Yes • No • Foutin is • Auger Cast Piles • Concrete • Kestrel / . ss P. 29S r ❑ Grout ❑ Structur:d Sir • Columns • Structural Slab • Mortar B) All items observed appear to be in accordance with approved plans and specifications: • Yes • No ZSS °F 0- Asphalt • walls • Slah -on -Grade ❑ Sls • Beams oi • Soils • Fireprt ® Other A CPNALT • Other 1 Representative:2E5 AA/ // C Signature: gs El Location: APPRQx mireL y </ CO OF f�tt OfAl4A ,9llt c 6 or &9Rh'ER /IJR,WoXJ V Sou: s o Z)uo /k9,UIp Ft Comments: ARli /MED /9, N - 08 recRV r/) , 2IcevE'ur 0 /4A3 P PFR FOP /WED TESTS 0 A A 5P//1 - Cre SFE Cnvi1PA r / R FPoAi to dAr» 72wPFR1p -7 &S M ERE A S /n4Ln49S. Miles Code 7771)c- /-( c 9 / /t 20 A 2 ?O F 771 uc/( 133 ` ?R / . ss P. 29S r - TR()r 927 3 :20 PM ZSS °F 1 Representative:2E5 AA/ // C Signature: gs DAILY FIELD REPORT 00' c ' Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road. Suite 5N. Spokane. WA 99206 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 891 -2012 Function Hours Code Miles Code Total Expenses Code ASPN11C7 ',A_ 124 /o 133 100/>%E 8 4 7 1 Representative:2E5 AA/ // C Signature: gs ....... PIP2e I of K. DAILY FIELD REPORT 00' c ' Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road. Suite 5N. Spokane. WA 99206 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 891 -2012 STA OFFSET r DEPTH READINGS AVG. 5 11 4' 141.1 q2 5 1434 64-42< PT Rf 141.0 141.3 qz - 0 74 2S �� L1 )4o.7 q 1 3 qL ' 3 1s(4 1 6 * 56 /a 2i r4S.9 144 .3-- qa.3 1o,v JO+ 50 14 u 143.G 14< 1 q3.q 1411 AVG. 1424 i2-.S STA. OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. 175 13'R7 be )1 42 .4- 142,7 3 --/ ii 1-r 19 -G G2,1 142.5 3-r-Ir 7 '12Y (4z.a qL ' 3 141, ¢ t�S 3( LT &e s 1o,v 138.4 S. pi 1411 qZ , z AVG. 141. 4Z .0 1-1./s 7s4 Hvt 2S 1 (-Attie 2 z Feu INLAND ASPHALT CO. ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMPACTION REPORT CONTRACT NO No. ("433) NO. . SECTI 4IVO ((AArn- 41// (.4/ r < REMARKS' ROLLER CODE: SDV = SINGLE DRUM VIBRATORY TS = TANDEM STEEL DDV = DOUBLE DRUM VIBRATORY 3WS = 3 WHEEL STEEL P = PNEUMATIC STA TO STA TONS 7 ATB THICK 1 CLASS 8, D ;� B�E, F, G LANE:6)O g.: 63 NB, SB OTHER �JJ 111111 LEVELING WEARING CONTROL LOT NO. STD. DENSITY RICE DENSITY 1 C? ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR REMARKS: STA. TO STA. CONTROL LOT NO. TONS A� ATB THICK 3 CLASS B, 0, E, F, G 4) LANE:, LI \ OF`EB, NB, SB OTHER LEVELING STD. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT a1-C GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR INSPECTOR �l t 1 STREET INSPECTOR DISTRIBUTION: WHITE- FILE CANARY- SUPT. PINK- O.A. - CONTRACTOR DATE PROJECT ENGINEER AIR 71.)° WEARING RICE DENSITY s ".4. (1 ., AIR 9 PAGE / OF Zj PAGES. IA -6 REV. 6/89 STA. OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. / roo 9" LT /3f Sp $ ( Li- o � q � Rr kz_? /3 - 3 -11-00 9'fir /3R2 70 /37 - e l t00 [r /3).G /SS, 85 7 Soo s' r /38. 70 / 39.' AVG. 87E (I/Y5 zsq /iyc zri (rAUn.0 2. Z /cam INLAND ASPHALT CO. ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMPACTION REPORT CONTRACT IAC NO n NO. SECTION AM� RA/o / 'Y STA. AVG. OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. REMARKS' ROLLER CODE: SOV = SINGLE DRUM VIBRATORY TS = TANDEM STEEL DDV = DOUBLE DRUM VIBRATORY 3WS = 3 WHEEL STEEL P = PNEUMATIC GAUGE PROJECT NO. ENGINEER /LJ TO 5 STA. TO STA. CONTROL LOT NO. TONS ATB THICK 2 ii CLASS B, 0, E, F, G LANE: OF ; EB, WC A, SB OTHER LEVELING STD. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT AIR t<ic GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR REMARKS: STA. TO STA CONTROL LOT NO. TONS ACP ATB THICK CLASS 8, D. E, F, G LANE: LT. OR RT.; EB, WB, NB, SB OTHER LEVELING WEARING STD. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR INSPECTOR 4 X (3 46. , STREET INSPECTOR • DISTRIBUTION: WHITE - FILE CANARY - SUPT. PINK- O.A. CONTRACTOR -is RICE DENSITY AIR DATE WEARING 1/ RICE DENSITY /S3 PAGE 3 OF 7 PAGES. IA -6 REV. 6/89 STA. OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. 6-15.5- 7' No, -e- , 7 o- ( j li /37/ 7' 1r /37 77'5 /38, 738, 8 7o ‘t /93- / - 2' RI /39,3 /z q, / $ t r ° /s' /3S ?o 3 7,4-s0 / /' /7l /73, R 8 92 9 _ � / / ' Rr /38. 6 AVG. / 0i- t /39,0 ?o AVG. 90 8 STA. OFFSET DEPTH READINGS AVG. �� S /Z' .cr / frt. / 92 s j li / '40, /38, 374 5-0 e'rzr /93- / 7 // /z q, / 9 t ro /s' / , 9 �j 7 ._� r fSo /s''r 9 _ � -/_Y AVG. 77 4 let? 7s9 /9 vs 2r/ (RUO,o 2 Z -/- /cm) N}5 zrt /Ws z.57 C Ai✓o,d 2 2 4-- Fhb INLAND ASPHALT CO. ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMPACTION REPORT CONTRACT IAC GAUGE PROJECT NO NO. NO. ENGINEER SECTION _Z )/) /.044 9 A Uf REMARKS: W TO E REMARKS' ROLLER CODE: SDV = SINGLE DRUM VIBRATORY TS = TANDEM STEEL DDV = DOUBLE DRUM VIBRATORY 3WS = 3 WHEEL STEEL P = PNEUMATIC STA. TO STA. CONTROL LOT NO. CLASS LANE: (t)OR 43) ; GO, NB, SB OTHER LEVELING STD. DENSITY ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR STA. CONTROL LOT NO. TONS A P ATB THICK 3 CLASS 8, D, E, F, G LANE' 0K:D;6CP NB, SB OTHER LEVELING WEARING STD. DENSITY RICE DENSITY Sir, ROLLERS PASSES TEMP: MAT ATB 8, D, E, F, G GAUGE CORRECTION FACTOR DISTRIBUTION: WHITE - FILE CANARY - SUPT. PINK - O.A. WEARING V RICE DENSITY /5 . AIR DATE TONS THICK 3 70 TO STA AIR /7/ C INSPECTOR .` . STREET INSPECTOR CONTRACTOR PAGE 2. OF 3 PAGES. IA -6 REV. 6/69 I'n,lect: RI L)t / Co 74-/1 Pi c- /-E /! 0 ic' el Project No.: ._ n/20 ,,1 �1 Address: E/rK /CC2 $ ZOD /g,V ,y/ ,A /9 5 / � .�c»99 Date: 0S r7 - (r eather: C me Miles Day of Week: A) .Approved Plans on Site: C) Items Observed Footin_s Columns Walls Soils Other or Tested: - D) Attached Report: ❑ Restrel • Yes • No • • Auger Cast Piles • Concrete ❑ Structural Stab ❑ Slab -on -Grade • • Mortar • Grout B) AB items observed appear to he in accordance with approved plans and specifications: • • Asphalt • Structural Steel 0 Soils ❑ Other • • Beams • Fireproofing Signature: ) l / i • Page I of 44 ""1 Representative:4�s [/J' / j L • Yes • No E) Location: DA) 2/ T c F) Comments: PPP/ U Ep /9-e,S Pi c- /-E /! 0 ic' el To'' i9k,cP n,e r To H e7 c--1/4 . i vy S , o /' ,A /9 5 / /9 577Q1 s iV p i¢ c r / e 0 /2c,€L,t rs, Miles Total Expenses Code c Cvu elegy / 22 9 , 0 DAILY FIELD REPORT s 0 Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N, Spokane. WA 99206 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 891 -2012 Function Hours Code Miles Total Expenses Code c Cvu elegy / 22 9 , 0 • '/ Signature: ) l / i Page I of 44 ""1 Representative:4�s [/J' / j L DAILY FIELD REPORT s 0 Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite 5N, Spokane. WA 99206 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 891 -2012 Pngeci: RP/ Ede A0117‹ Project No.: 90 cJ 6- Qy/0 Address: Date: ' 7 -ts ❑cher: C"L. 00p Day of �b eek: &o .A) Approved Plans on Site: C) Items Observed or Tested: D) Attached Report: 4.Concrete ❑ Resteel ❑ Yes • No • Footings • Auger Cast Piles Code ❑ Columns ❑ Structural Slab • Mortar • Grout B) All items observed appear to be in accordance with approved plans and spec i ticit tions: Co,Ucpe ❑ wi • Slab -on -Grade • Asphalt ❑ Structural Steel ❑Soils ❑ Beams tt�� �J 4 // y (Cl -Ocher C(1RR 4 ( 1' T Te . • Soils • Fireproofing 0 Other CO ,U C2 c-2 ❑ Yes • No E) Location: C URS Nme - 5 /Pr o,C •4on /4nn CO APPRO,X. / z 5 esl sT op v AR eR R 0_ F) Cgmments: ARRI isCp S". "S 1 /V. 0.(3,5' c.-7 tiEb A A c E/ -167() T AAJO PEA7- C.4/W6 ?ESi S 2rfic.) rOA 1 c/ c r, 4 C PER A7 / pi/UP A c 0TQ o 1 X Etil CA % S r/ Pi C t7/YEN'o!o c,� To /u4 — A So — J ./ C : / O Alt . / EkH 7 - z. - .. - -_ FRoP1 7 WA l 6 -her 7 Wgr Tye% ©,CMG S' ,O-CED 4 c Yc 40Pak < 7.'c, - R FT0444F TU f-/ r .r o, ,C7 (-&--- thus rALLsO // C Cove i to (/�,A /t y /,/c oA X. c, rnios7 Atveirk , /1c/ Cam[& AN» s7}//2 TN fl- T /A)DE<D 7WCY n Co,) 7 a0c/5 0AscPu lli/),(M AM PE ->- gETv P,l m t- D • to si /tun 6 i cati cp foe) R ('4) flL cn tl,PLE ) aAi C'oa /a` yo o/ 9.DO /TY L CYZ /NWs @ 9. 4/11 - eoc1; 77 " Z2_3 FRoP1 7 Function Hours Code Miles Code Total Expenses Code Co,Ucpe Z 22 `t /0 . CO ,U C2 c-2 z-z 1 e t /o 4-33 HCI Representative: LE /T� Signature: �� / Page I of C___ DAILY FIELD REPORT PFRM I _ s 0n .4 4 Howard Consultants, Inc. N. 2128 Pines Road, Suite SN, Spokane, WA 99206 (509) 891 -1904 Fax (509) 891 -2012 Pi' e is I t]��lOi,(_!L Project No.: s -- D 44.1t -O flip AJJresc R4kAr_ k hnI - � Date: [ (o -Cjs Alec l Day of week: TLs , Ai Approve) Plans on Site: C) Items Observed or Tested: D) Attached Report: ❑ Yes • No • Footings • Auger Cast Piles ❑ Concrete • Resteel I • Columns • Structural Slab • Mortar • Grout 1), All ucros observed appear to he in ;,; cordance with approved plans and . peciliaruuns: • walls ❑ Slah - on - Grade ❑ Asphalt • Structural Steel ❑Soils ■ Beams ❑ Soils • Fireproofing ❑ Other ❑ Other Signature: Page 1 of • Yes • No Function Hours Code Miles Code Total Expenses Code (m,G 1 22 10 Q, / " " -' Representative: Signature: Page 1 of E Location: DAILY FIELD REPORT M 2053 ! F l Comments. A-22 t V tC Q ct O S t T� A I 5 " A t.s �1 .O O -� I tl- cDr)t Y Pc-l2 , "'Al T F Fl ik-)A- - frcT „ A-5 r,)rs' - - m+ ve A Lal at Fl ti1Fs t !' C u_&' ( (4 4 ci-Y 0 F ,r.C_ r''nr ecc.rmn T , , - 7 A44-v g r^ APcFu Fn Tilt C'm,) c,e,E -i C 4 a,0 7 Howard Consultants, Inc. 1428 South Main Street, Moscow, ID 83843 (208) 882-1006 Fax (208) 883 -4750 Date Arrival Ti n% :CO Weather Client General Contractor Subcontractor /AI (,/1/4 4 / !G cci aA2 IPE Field Representative • INLAND PACIFIC WIG ENGINEERING 6o cry ce s , IPE FIELD REPRESENTAT 05 Corresponding Deficiency Report No AV -et (A) elk 2" Inspector's Daily Report No.: , IPE Project No.: Page No. ll /�� CEO/- +-, -v to" Ovt ('O CY"4 60 (1 i fI /ri ., /'a :-r. eA. . /7e@ ✓ Local Representative/ phone number Site Representative/ phone number r 14 �1�i i Y ° F 4)-41 / Manpower & / Equipment Used A — ( AMP/04= J ,tten /t( 77r t,r LA n.t' A.r_ IPE Project Manager/ phone number 1 i ^✓ '- (1 it 'c, A 1 / 2 K0 - 7 4 .-le r % /,fC" /f.Qt,r / Lafine C(ct/l-e — //go /2 x41 7916' / /a"<! C Comments: i (Work Completed Apparently ("C (a / / / Q / (/C/ /`l'/(,•.PG/ � {�J s /'� C�`2� /"a s.,p� /�„� 72C.— per Specifications Problems / / / Or Solutions) /� fl —,t-, e•-•.„-... �' /, d / # ,r/c6 LU 0 / Ori /d � p a ire q f� �O;-v /i / ' C G/ / /'rJNS. //Len Gc,l"C G ,/ //7,- r y o .5, r , /77 C /77 //0 het 9 / ot DAILY FIELD REPORT 9,e4 r/N, 74 4a tai ✓ ,Sa , At, /e aHcf / Ji c LA) a /< PGs ^/ O F � r 6) a s o n fort Sr?/2 i 7 6 7 ci irrt. 6 4 . r 7 � rt-l/ i T to /ve Per. 7%.. 5,/r. etic, CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer and /or IPE project manager. Date )11") IA IPE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER C ER ` IPE PROJECT ANAGER // >1 7 INLAND C PACIFIC ENGINEERING /eh; / r/ on/ /<' Date o r T 1(9 /v e�'cn33cNa,.y IPE Project No. / Inspector's Daily Report No.: / / Page No. of 2- DAILY FIELD REPORT �� � Y, // , Comments: /�G/ C " � 4 -y /�'p S G�.�� /nn . 3`/� �vvi'q (Work Completed Apparently / per Specifications V - _ -"- 1, _ . � .r / "el ;Ka SPA ,L _ - ._.. and their Solutions) // / /�-ao ,fr n3 / /1tJ v ,e r .. T 6c o re," ,r,t er" 1 f' ,rte ( /.r) /4.1 ay (Dn /r) e er'�`�r7S 7 ) Si) // /4eneri'4 f%�. / T� ..S, ) cuo I` rip _ & utak 9cni t ref a .�l�rX /U �i F, f6ti f. /'C . / !' ✓ e-t ° ) eU cJ C , rl An f P 0 A10 a / / .S /! f Luc(' /< Gc,; ?Lk .6h.],,&e/.:r .41 x r� /ar ;l // �C� �(! /..L, (0 q,wtL( / O')-it / "l f t✓/f' • ,�rJ Cl % / r' C 6../-ten ' tJer /icy nit /2_46._ AP dl; A "one, /77 e) c .! rerzri a r j' l-_e... ,SU) 60 re in-ad D h: Z ,., < i Gt frt-ct Vt u. , y T1L /t _. /.t.-ei /4 /-r TZc. r'4. At'ct. Non - Conforming Items: (Project or Standard Specification Observed Construction is In Non - Compliance with) IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep INLAND MN PACIFIC ENGINEERING Date /2 /e° rPb /no cry(' Arrival Time ' Weather c4E4 4 (7o Client General Contractor Subcontractor IPE Field Representative Comments: "alert Completed Apparently Specifications Problems _..J their Solutions) 7{/; !o - nc.r e_?± • 2•, 117X Manpower & Equipment Used / ' e /A / ,^ ru n.N � C'� e<✓ /,. ml .473 ,l ,`✓I NA. 4...I /i n 014.11 < G• "e �Jn er f 7.4.2 inf /P G / i /rP i� O /� tr/irnJ n G se X7 /rJ S ;74 „.4 � n i SP �. ree � t% Con P eP /f Cte... C. .2 Gt 17 / e tJ /' rid i /lo r, 9 e7'! /! � � / /� ” ii-ed i / /G !n O n S � •/-2 CAI, LJL C o 1" el r.A •:. 7 ' et./I t Ai e /. J 1 G J e s fiA 0 6e f G.. ed LA / • / T e WEn i/y 7`rS�-S a/r!n a 4 Sh rc.1 a e / Q.t Le (1071 /4 A C •rM . ( 1 4 re._.. //K - gait ('re Q/ / it e G/ 0./J 71-e_ A G s e. /> e.a)r JP//iir. /.rP frllr1 /r), e . / Lin L!'P st_ � Gl IPE FIELD REPRESENTA VE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered prelimir>pry until revpiicved and signed by the IPE construction engineer and /or IPE project manager. Date /41 , yC IPE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER l' (% wresponding Deficiency Report No: i /vC /Ula, �l S r Inspector's Daily Report No.: IPE Project No.: 7C/0 Page No. / of i Loc I Representative/ phone number ite Representative phone number DAILY FIELD REPORT IPE Project Manager/ phone number ,Z;i!; Gr./4 im 4_ / s e -4",pto /ea SXf Aar /l/�c D IAA- / c r f. In s( ! . IS G .,..f� CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE IPE PROJECT te fl4p , ; f3/ GER 7 INLAND al PACIFIC ENGINEERING A v a 1= Date _ 4 P6 Inspector's Dally Report No. IPE Project No. q6/% 6 Page No. DAILY FIELD REPORT of Comments: , S7`/`inf /ine (or- 74 F /ow Ic' 4,. of 4r 742 (Work Completed Apparently / �` per Speci ications Problems ie1t /y' A iyg . / h! r /t!' -.) / M 4 `a �/c TL 7 Zcd and their Solutions) / , .x r /r,o e (J. / /r A, /t-ei I. .L-e,,-e / o 1' riinli Ka a rt e , TGe A: //,e , ',., r . S "'rim} / -e ,Cr v-e -/ w / 74 r:~ eitet. 14•01 /l e a r Pr" rit. C x/ 5/ ,4,x, 4.4/' o n . /1f/ %1%'// a n 74 rA- me, / i'eA / a.1etc rhe_ 1., ✓e o /Tl1e. ex �'j9!'r'� away /roi. Tie ex r'r P'1ky As,® 44.17o' rJ G / /O /I'! / /Cr S/4/ /,,?.9 G ..f/t.�/J O(.(. H�(,� / T N The_ y Y s 6e n ac/ T /.� Ca - :4 /r & .A J "r^ /a The / /'c /f.e /tan e / >oral / Cell /rr 4 74. o G /s ,a T4 re 49 r /r a/,,� a // a x / I ,O ro n / n / X • TL /in) 1 /i v, e . 5/ r t- /; j -, e G ,, O P i l i hair / i ; it. //r I -CI G 1 // S e �,1�i'a ,i S /)./ 1.1 re_ A' & ,/P / // & e Q./ ee /a . SI .p'c,r /✓r1 1` /e-cw n r /`e v nrs.e (%o-u/6 .) , � a ao /cc cal./a S/ - s 425 k O.i Aa/t4 east aci<< (A c/ 4 /- 7 ,s kn_` tin /-,-/ G. /rrrt/ c / Iy roar'ed . X _s (.3 7 a- // 7 Lc ,z, 5/ a r mo r / , 5e era y -ts 4' c5 / F / r c / ret.c4 r vr s. /,(/e Gu ; // (!e - n G c.f c /� fJ) / TG /' ,4 s ,S r d r 7 r 9, , rr-- 0 P7 Ca- / " /1.. /_' 'set r ire .4 S e ., re/('. [Lt i6-h cre_74 7n1 IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep Date 7 INLAND op PACIFIC ENGINEERING IPE Project No. //rJ /o Comments: (Work Completed Apparently per Specifications Problems and their Solutions) eel e /,2 &ee ?& f 4„ n-2_, a 7 74. rd ri.'f a✓r, tz A l . r / lr/ i yin i o I � 5 , 0 , ( 7 0 . 4r,,,,/ 6 nX / g" g /'n n i7.. r Tr /I IPE Feild Rep IPE CE /2n ✓ u JR J" DAILY FIELD REPORT Inspector's Daily Report No.: Page No. j of ` 3 fro / Apy Ja/ Gcf air ea p. � ;,u. ,A C kJ at in s , X2 7 Jay �o 00.0 P1 f P S 1 D H 0 i t em / r-a ;IA /rt.! eaolfi /o n 7 G/-P o / P - i s-r ca.( /!!✓ /a , 7L 6 ( r- /' rya a- /5 /oG Cy /'Ml /J' 4r'-2csTi) / /rGd' /Jo. /fir 4 7 o — ,t,t /fr 7'�t4Dlar e / (I.0 Ai r'. / /.c. 4 /- f 1 to 7 ! . / �c Cot, c rr-- - ('re ". W r re ,on r _r 4 - /' e' i h to r c , A f / /t 7 easel r rr /Yt r a N r es.r..-c.e- 1 -. - O N .116- /"r' c/ Pa -r O A 6 P e h /Pert, red 4 / r74 . ,7 e / r / rail / /o T ke f/0 cv / at- Tib[, C' // / %�. rx r'r 7 1 /yrp_ /Ay,4 A C � �x /IAA a / rrA' 9 1 4/ C✓' u.� (.✓f /o /-o-4 t /9/7", 9rrtt • /n-eft ff en , / P4 a.l:re Ie.[ s 6, / // l �� ,'Cfkie SS a y a /J /P �s n'J /l/ -te7/ Z / 4 0 /` / `"�' -n N /rr J7.t..a/.r4 / ; -Mr 5 %. 4/, / 0 'i ,ai / es-/ 02 TZC 4/4/ 4,7 , 4 // . f A e e n frig re a /7 7 , Con e/'P7f !(/de. /,r/.c ,P /f, 7GL1eek... /�1°4 td -Zte c 6ty TI&GV I t'totI cot ire/ kc4) W eL / K / 0 �lvt '( IPE PM Contractor's Rep EriSTNG ACP DETAIL 1 SECTION A 14E2 14E.1 GUTTER Euv. ASPINLT AVEVDR 202E73 TC 2X23.23 D ISSNG CONCRETE CURB a GUTTER EXISTING EIEyARON DEMO ACP GRAPHIC SCALE TO iroIAa R9 O�K ASRW \� SCE MAR ONTTEE TO EE WARPED AMY IRDE CURB AS RECESSMT TO MATCH ELLS11160 ASPHALT SEE ECM- E. iSirn, P Setia tr Inland Pacific Engineering West 707 7th, Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 509 458 -6840. Fax No. 509 458-6844 / r Jrs �r /'S- et, /T SP /Or, 2 L A'r- /loo r Tf. ,45 o ri5nrno.(17 STG.(fCc 0.1 Itkit o/!i'rf 14.4s% (o Ac. 0, t„ n L V4rirs 1. U ,l 0,l ail Re.'r*ti P la-co de r r'k VArie.S MEMO ❑ PROJECT /( yer/4 /o //( sC CALC. ❑ JOB NO 74 /0 6 SHEET $ OFS MEETING ❑ r;tic BY 7 74" DATE /- ?-/9-/G OTHER CHK'D BY DATE Job Name / / l IPE Job No. 11/ W.O. : Field Resort No Date /p? /ABC. rC Tech. 5 ALT )S= MS= Test Jo. Location Ft. Below SG. Elev Wet Density (PCF) Moisture (Percent) Dry Density (PCF) Max Density Percent Compaction ass or Fail Retest of DT No. I /0i30 .Pr ,9 o' e 6e /31r 5/ /.J / /31 75 0 cr 27,0,-4 a.,,.<, 1/4)1 'a 4'4-70' @ /3e /%7 I 7) /.79 0 /3, 7 7 �'1 9.7a ier3o' 6 e //4, GG 1)1) /JG 1 41.■ INLAND o p PACIFIC all ENGINEERING NUCLEAR GAUGE TEST RESULTS : ear.,in INLAND a EACIFIC ENGINEERING Date S /ZIES �} Arrival lime L • Oo Weather Client I - • L4/1-: enera on ctor k•C. L . Subcontractor C LouoY - ot, IPE Field Representative Manpower & Equipment Used C C - L -sc&(s_ c. j Comments: ark Completed Apparently ? Speclfleations Problems aheir Solutions) 4 /,o ft PazVX/Hnp7L -'t 4 /0 Lig tr 5rrAr10 - K_ A rnAt -tom 66Thuo Dpugt,E. 7)euvA Tibia 4C/g CFFPLti 4o0wPrtrrtttJ roe anti su sog-A A r613, .1L> RZvZ £ t X Au rreta R 4wts z-C Ta vOat- 4-77,414 to /7 4 /nmPv -V 7 1-i1 iNet - S9T2Cr fro et-t_ Z2 tA flMU A- DtDI11'dJ•ler • u lrrr� ,-t 1n Pt t- L,rJE+ , k1a I �ll[r 14YP —NrEt or I mo/ S.nS 'To ogs 1 -vg il lA /S / rm_cr7cA/ oG Tit. 6okJc-e,Snr 7'(1 ()rot- /I f -1 1 /r7ura /N- e IJ e_ 'r C_NT /L l IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE IP CON,TRUCTION•ENGINEER 6 va(z.tus v4. is f- A -oi t- ,J Corresponding Deficiency Report No Inspector's Dally Report No.: IPE Project No.: `lulu Le Page No. of Z 3 Local Representative/ phone number Vc .4.1C St,c nrz ..l. g21 -luto it e Representative/ phone number DAILY FIELD REPORT ■ IPE Project Manager/ phone number .uc.r r Owerti> L. 1 C -0- C.n $ L i 0. ry..1 '77hs X /Levi (Ad 4 volt- LADC / &JD /�D77F Sri't eoc - t_r) V($V,d -c...LY oiSses-Vt17 4172 11DtJ4L 1ZDL. L/ an c CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer and /,br IPE project manager. Date IPE PROJECT MANAGER G .0 Date „,.... INLAND PACIFIC all ENGINEERING � S0/ IPE Project o. 6,06 Date Comments: tt)Dlrl o&/$11— `t /MeZ 6D,uPrtrs/o._l ,4PP01 (Work Completed Apparently C ,1 per Specifications Problems �p,�, /�p�,�ntJC-S ;t7-1 �h�p. C.Z . ‘JD VS. and their Solutions) ' • LP” x LA tote; ,-ors 1-11 Its ,, Onm /UZ€P rue. ( /C- °e€TY ur")/s i rr� /— &7urr t�.a - s ti rx /ems 7t? 7 .CD 7t ?rtftt e JS ,fx./D ,xJ fccce IDfl% /C-C 1 - 11 7 - 17 7 : 1*PPU)✓cam «k4)`/ C. -67) l r � . ) g:oo ''`' �Szl%✓Cp 111.4rnD0 I VI n L� 73I£ X 4.eurrt5c.- etx.16 </J - L roef-t , I- IXPE(5 1) #h' b t Z,t /onn16 % Le P�>4 f Lfll l� isa , � 1n l 77{L �.1l7� � -tX ._ CfJ2i' 7) / This Al • 51 7S or /D trb t4- ( r aX / rvl ?Y 2- Pt+7,ic - ,SJ 52 txPIZ4 S5 ei7 r .-1 J o ler /6 fifX /,tCC4 r, 13 C.0 wo S$ t7 "AC . L14 /r,4 /L, brhrt . P u,c /GY f%e,i &(P Lt Patr_terrn,.-/ 7a 779 ctr -p 7GY_LPi raj (-et t — o o TgALID7 r J. 1,C k L.tf�'r 7}1T Ar X/ot: &/. o' Sipe.soi - t _ e: 4448 7D 'i 1 5 Scx-A/sG - ice Zrr.../t - T#':- Co . Co • 1}F4044r1 0 - re=. ? $C.» cjL .tom .a L-Hn _ fvflC. IPE Feild Rep • IPE CE Inspector's Dally Report No.: 3 Page No. of Z Z ' 4/ 7. u n - cx- Fee tse. 7a 711th TF6 9 ,Z P ,er # 1. 9:o . ° rfrti./ PRo»a DAILY FIELD REPORT /t/ ///r /.t2lto IPE PM Contractor's Rep 7 INLAND PACIFIC MN ENGINEERING Date Inspector's Daily Report No.: - 7 -9 -9 Arrival Time 4 IPE Project No.: q 3" / COIOCD Weather Page No. of Client Local Representative/ phone number DMN - OOCV (b, VAC,CJdc JAc0856r /4 / - / &/0 General Contractor Site Representative/ phone number Subcontractor IPE Project Manager/ phone number To>1n t - )4 DPI 1 4 - 6946 IPE Field Representative Manpower & Equipment Used MnnlE 04 'S - re C 7 Air= r) I/,S,r Comments: � •rk Completed Apparently "7 —'m 2rvi 7 H rJA,t f �•�n n1J TH LC Specifications Problems and their Solutions) (1oP�,p oe /kits pc iJ l YYfnnl 71t1 �=i?- it.�ew1L- (•lA� MF—pc, i)Pe - ?,,),l -T Coo c:)rT7nnl i 17-r . 7&_.) - 77 - c AA I1 - 2 C - A 110 Errs ugcro A P Penx yiniF ✓ 10g fTh, 5; Prni. 'THt f i rvlvrIz/ Ft-E R � • . 44• MEd u • Jl t F�1.2J i PTc7� Cro t'*twt Vol-- e / � S Er ') C 0 i IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer d/or IPE project manager. / Date /IPE NSTRUCTION ENGINEER t1/4) C-r =W O Corresponding Deficiency Report No I ecous DAILY FIELD REPORT CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE ill u / l am • IPE PROJECT MANAGER Date June 6, 1997 Mr. Verne Jacobsen Dean Housley Company 16720 N.E. 116 Street Redmond, Washington 98052 Re: Riverwalk 1S Addition - Construction Deficiency List Public Improvements Dear Verne: This letter transmits a list of construction items for the above referenced residential development that are currently in non - conformance with the approved projects plans and specifications and applicable Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. These items must be corrected prior to finalization of project record drawings, and prior to calling for final inspection and acceptance of the construction by the County Engineer's office as well as any bond reductions. This letter is based on items observed during a site visit on June 3, 1997 and is limited to areas of the improvements whose adequacy could be visually determined at the time of our visit. This list of observed deficiencies in project construction is intended to serve as input to help you achieve project acceptance by Spokane County. The absence of constructed items from this list in no way implies that any unlisted item(s) have been approved or are approvable under current County Standards. By copy of this letter, we are notifying the County Engineer's staff that we have requested compliance on the issues listed below. Please contact us when the above deficiencies have been corrected, so that we can proceed with the project certification and acceptance by Spokane County in a timely manner. General Deficiencies 1) Sweep and clean all sidewalks, curb and gutter, and streets of all debris and excess sand and gravel. 2) Post construction bond for amount of $1,950.00 per Ed Parry letter. Re: Red paver brick instead of concrete brick used for vertical adjustment. --- - 3) Confirm acceptance of retaining wall on the sidewalk, north side of Indiana, approximate station 4 +00. Storm Drainage 1) Sod and irrigate pond in Tract "C ", Riverwalk 2n Addition, due to acceptance of public drainage. 3 Riverwalk 1 Page 2 Pavement 1) Compact base course and pave asphalt adjacent to concrete cross gutter at Indiana and McMillan Lane. Sidewalk 1) Remove and replace approximately 4 panels of sidewalk on the north side of Indiana west of H.C. ramp at approximate station 5 +00. Sidewalk has settled and created a lip between the sidewalk and the curb. 2) Remove and replace 2 panels of sidewalk around the U.S. West manhole due to settlement, and lip between the curb and sidewalk. Approximate Indiana station 4 +20, left. 3) Remove and replace 1 panel of sidewalk, approximate Indiana station 3 +50, right. Sidewalk has crack. 4) Patch and grout around the H.C. ramp at the west side of Indiana and McMillan Lane. Curb and Gutter 1) Remove and replace broken curb and gutter on Indiana, approximate station 2 +60, right. 2) Remove and replace broken curb and gutter on Indiana, approximate station 4 +40, right. 3) Remove and replace broken curb and gutter at the west curb retum on Indiana and Harmony. 4) Remove and replace curb return at the west intersection of Harmony Lane and Mission Avenue. If you have any questions or would like to schedule inspections and testing of any concrete pours, please give me a call. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. Bruce A. Howard Principal cc: Spokane County Engineers Office c32/3 '4y iD i INLAND PACIFIC I In al ENGINEERING Date 1- Arrival Time PIJA I :CO Weather L'O yt Imo. , Client Genera Contractor i e epresen • lve p one num er Sub ontractor /� c�Ldn-a'C l f)r. is t3Tc (. ttr -4 IPE Field Representative Manpower & Equipment Used - 3 1_40,e4 SG. - 1 Lam,•,3ta lomments: ;-i metre tv bs v�v6• � C-C. 4- Y_•C._. Nark Completed Apparently t NAM t. per Specifications Problems and their Solutions) ppyNnO V l C- ea c CC-45r-r" S' 1S�riA+lt� SY'3 1PC2_ Tth rtAt -itr (. 1 Comer t - i�'hr —ritrA / h ` T 1: 2t,8Ors Th! r'-tDV ri c r1,..ID t4AJr>t27- Trtr s,pfltS j -,per u • viar a 1, I- Af oi(• Sn4. f iat , Lt. . — Mr S''m,lo '-orrt fZ vwo,itn Akin 1,1M - 1'C s,11-11-3 /h :aas ez .ZI -77.0 , . , e 4 ..a '. Ara . - ea �►q uL rlowtmkc -rb-,Z t �I • •rtt-t- 1 — st .a L. Pr' S,nr d_ z :15 1 IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer a or IPE project manager. Date c- Date ■ IPFrrCO1 rRUCTION ENGINEER Corresponding Deficiency Report No Inspector's Daily Report No.: IPE Project No.: Page No. Local Representative/ phone number "aeIca- of Iect Mager/ phone number GC Z o.Z� _ 1 - RAe-x} DAILY FIELD REPORT 5 IPE PROJECT MANAGER � - D,.twt il?ut/r_ CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE ■ INLAND am PACIFIC ENGINEERING Date • rr 3 ��. Arrival Time Weather Client rtr ear. Genera Contrac or 4,G. G s r zu� Subcontractor IPE Fieepr sentative Manpower & Equipment Used lam.. u.D• A.1K.l p2- Comments: 'Wprk Completed Apparently w - ,SpeclflcaUons Problems _..:d their Solutions) LO I IA-41S C- 47-441C C n-0 Crn F62— Lofnf X77 t l� c-carC } t t,1 -n-1a c IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE (E C StTAUCTION ENGINEER n14-4a ,e._ LS% I - 1 flzw.ry -*-a Page No. LA..) is r r.42i PS nnJ 4s.17 yaJthLg Corresponding Deficiency Report No Inspector's Daily Report No.: IPE Project No.: of 1 1 Local Representative/ phone number Its IAtc3s6J . Isis Representative/ phone number IPE Project Manager/ phone number gzctc 4 -I S E- t_ vtSe2i�c -S. ea l41 -)to ra - � /L °� Ptzo —? . 'MK SI „ onar- DAILY FIELD REPORT 6 f>,.PC-LSx -s ,cce t4--tFSC_. ?rq'reN- Ra.t>✓S a- F S -s4-tQ r .-tr ••t �—I'T. v,l -Erb 4-evts tt.l T74t_r A-Clli —&e cr. , Alo dDAJC.1C C b 7r.5 ii# 4irla t` ,4,. rem vT ene cflazt CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engine ,gr and /or IPE project manager. Date IPE PROJECT MANAGER Date • INLAND JIB PACIFIC IIMM ENGINEERING - Yaa,n (--z Date .� Inspector's Daily Report No.: Arrival Time IPE Project No.: We Client Genera Contractor _ Site Representative p one number k •�.. ('x».Jsn c4 1. Subcontractor YtP sTI L IPE Field Re resp entab Manpower & Equipment Used Comments: 'irk Completed Apparently Specifications Problems and their Solutions) c .tcccS' n-, /C.iC T vr-. lam.- (?44r l.fa%R'‘ 4 P c. :J. 7 ? 1: 74..41 1_ • • a 1. . - ,b Ss o. C . tti1Z m : c7—o 24— . LEC: ra c A-dfl 1_,41 Velar. C. �rtra`SSv'1. M . t}� B-Gp u rcn /4 'n+,zo-ir, 4 CrTrbc- t� IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE 40-71 This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construc on engineer and/or IPE project manager. Date I CO TRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT MANAGER Corresponding Deficiency Report No yv1 CXp DAILY FIELD REPORT 7 Page No. of Z Local Representative! phone number IPE P roj ctp Manager/ phone number ere 77i'r S r�aTt�t�i •• /ADC , ti!tc�Zi i + rh wk._ L—rh-loSt r>pr Ler/C CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE Date Date 7 INLAND MN PACIFIC ENGINEERING IPE Project No. Page No. of CILtICLC Z 2— �A t t bLi� Q S C-jtsLO Comments: (Work Completed Apparently per Specifications Problems and their Solutions) '57 D&C tort' -Ic- , rwrC en-e- Snu._ ,'CI Pc- t - T ltc 44S4! Non - Conforming Items: (Project or Standard Specification — Observed Construction is In Non - Compliance with) IPE Feild Rep i tK P F'..4.zo-ttry T> T?i-C at-4,0 f2.41 rpcu r2 . 77 {� Pi4're-s4 iAOe--e- M'PPnl412-cr ro PvEs f 02:f--i h%tnq yt,jc..0 r. i n4 • C • e ;"15 1 i.Ane9rt-PS Furl- ThlePig i ( , a G ,4 7 . ye—. IPE CE Inspector's Daily Report No.: DAILY FIELD REPORT IPE PM Contractor's Rep Operation and Maintenance Manuals for: Riverwalk l ser At›r›I-Flot-1 Satisfying the irrigation Industry Since 1976 North 7710 Market St. Spokane, (4'.4 99207 (509) 467-6601 FAX (509) 467-9317 Artistic Lan Mai It ..11p=6 c tawincerw..pesprziymnarartrstrrxecraeuttnrzaht="4,rr-r 7 -A TABLE OF CONTENTS: Item: Operation and Maintenance Manuals Project: Riverwalk Contractor: Artistic Landscape ITEM: TYPE: MODEL # 1. Backflow: Watts 007m series 2" 2. Controller: Rain Bird Rc1260c 3. Quick Coupler: Rain Bird model 33rc 4. Control valves: Rain Bird DV series Hardie Century Series 5. Valve Boxes: Carson Models 1419124, 1220124, 910104 6. Stop Valve: Ford 7. Spray heads: Rain Bird 1800 Series Toro 570 Series 8. Rotors: 9. Pipe: 10. Fittings 11.Wire Connectors Brw11 -333w Series Hunter Pgm series PGP series Toro 640 series PW Class 200 Lasco Schedule 40 Schedule 80 Nipples Paige Spears evagreen 14 Guage Single Strand Model DS 400 12.Stop Valve Ford Brw11 -333w Series Thank you for choosing Artistic Landscape, Inc. Prepared by Evergreen Pacific Supply, Inca S ail 0 � T'G Satisfying the Irrigation Industry Since 1976 I No A Olmaesiens 8 ( C actin, 0 E F Weigel (lbs -1 00707 10 27/16 45/8 — 5 1 1/2 I2 0070T -S 13 27/16 45/8 3 6 5 512 3/4' 00764207 111/8 31/8 • — — 63/16 5 • 00799207-$ 14 12 3118 4 3 61/8 fiYtfi 611 0071410T• 131/4 41/32 51/8 — — 71/2 12 0071910T -S 1715/16 4122 51/8 3 1/4 7314 712 14 2' 00764207 163/4 312 93/4 27 1 1/2' 007M201-S 231/8 312 — 33/4 71/16 93/4 3512 007M10T 1912 4 61 /4 — — 133/8 253/4 007 -S 255/8 4 61/1 4 8311 1718 33 12 I 007000A 351/8 11 12114 lfi 3/4 97 0070T 33% 694 8% 1695 155 2W 007 NRS 33', 113'. — — 8% 16% 155 I 007 115 &Y 00700014 33 °. 33°, 15 %1 15/ — — B3'• 12+,. 1615 1695 158 164 00701 007 NRS 007058Y 007 000* , < N b O ■ z o o 'A i8 34". 6% 84'. 16% 155 34''. 122 — — 8% 16% 185 34". 18'% — — 836 1636 185 34% 18'% — — 12''. 1631 196 1 Aries 007 G7..,es 1/2 3" s 007 Double Check Valve Assembly is designed to p protection of the safe drinking water supply in ac- cordance with national plumbing codes and water utility ority requirements for containment at the service line once. They can be applied to a variety of installations re the degree of hazard is considered to be low. sizes can be installed horizontally or vertically and are dardly fumished with ball type test cocks and quarter- , full port, resilient seated bronze ball valve shut -offs (1/2" - 2 ") No. 007QT. Y "- 1" have Tee handle shut -offs. 'es 2' " and 3" have resilient seated NRS flanged gate c ■� e shut -offs No. 007NRS. replaceable seats • No special tools required for servicing t odular construction enable Models Sizes: "- 2" lx U - union connections with stainless steel body'/ ", 0 /4 ",1" Ix OT - with quarter -turn, full port, resilient seated ball valves S- with bronze strainer F- without shut -offs s: 2'h" and 3" RS - non -rising stem resilient seated gate valves OS &Y - with resilient seated outside stem & yoke shutoffs t T T -with quarter -turn, full port, resilient seated ball valve shut -offs without shut -offs valves - FDA - with epoxy coated ball valve shut-offs )A • double check detector assembly andards (see page 3) essure- Temperature Supply pressure up to 175 PSI. Water temperature.sizes 2" 140 °F continuous, 180 °F intermittent. Sizes 21/2" d 3" 110 °F continuous, 140 °F intermittent. imensions- Weights (approximate) Olmesions in.) H N •J 10 61/2 9 10'8 7 10 Stier Sire 2'h -0 o tor serv,cn0 72 WGT. (Ibs) 26 34 4 As compiled from documented Foundation for Cross - Connection Control and Hydraulic Research at the University of Southern California lab tests. 'Typical maximum mechanical/Irrigation system flow rate (7.5 feel per second) NOTE t a Gallons per minute, 1t a Feet per second 1/2 007 16 12 e 4 12 1' 00707 10 4 CA ' — a i 0 1•t =6/Lfl�aMI 5 10 520 5 30 35 40 45 50 5560t 5 75 10 15 2077 • r 0070T 14 ----- •--- -- - - -- - --- - -1■ 10 - 0 -..1: 6 - a---11•11■ __ a�- 2 -00�1� - - - - -- 0 - O- O h■inWa---- 25 50 100 125 1 0 175 2 07 5 7 5 10 1511 14 10 6 2 0 l! "- 1 /2 . 2" 007 'L" - 2" 2 "007DCDA Capacity 3' 007 21/2. OCOA • 6 8 10 1 1 5 7.5 loft 60 120 40 240 300 3501 1511 5 7 5 10 Double Che k � s 17 3/4'007542 07 • 6 2 0 6 2 25 50 5 100 125 150 175 200 225 2 at 0 5 7.5 10 1517 ; .a 10 20 30 40 50 2 1/2. 007 15 14 10 007 211', 3" - _- _ -0 --- -----i_ -= =-- G �C�O - - - - - -11•11 12 18 22 26 32t 11.511 4 8 2.s 7.5 10 1/• 00707 • w— rA- 11-l�__an ____-leeee__aran 60 70 ea 90 100 110 120 5 7.5 10 15tt • ____.- rar_ assiemtagim e— men-amena_ 25 50 75 1 0 1 5 150 1 5 200 225 2501 5 7.5 10 571 !ME 2 44 60 1 0 120 140 160 1601 5 7.5 10 1511 3' 0070CDA 14 10 E II 50 100 150 2 0 250 5 75 A a _ � °°•q e �M1 it 'I r °/ 007 21/2", 3" 3 0 350 400t L4 1511 For more information, sena for ES -0075. ES -007 .12Dr ES007L. ES- 2 "007DCDA and ES-007DCDA. 0 1 1 Series 007 louble Check Valve 1 Sizes 1 /2 "- 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Repair Kits: 1 I 1st Check 887045 887025 887186 I 887719 2nd Check 887046 RK 007M2 CK2 3 /4" 1 887028 RK 007 CK2 1 - 2" 887187 RK 007M1 CK2 1 /z" - 2" 887720 RK 007M2 CK2 11/2" 1 1 1 'Note: Rubber seat disc can be replaced. However, disc holder and disc retainer are 1 permanently bonded to prevent failure. EDP No. Kit No. a�S 887193 887377 887393 887373 887024 887026 Cover Check Kits: 1st or 2nd Check Stainless Steel 1st or 2nd Check 887030 887032 887031 887035 887189 887190 Kit consist of: Seat, cage, Cover o -ring. Rubber Disc 1' a• • r Cover O- ring ? a a 0 e RK 007 CK4 RK SS007 CK4 RK SS007M2 CK4 RK SS007M1 CK4 RK 007 CK4 RK 007M1 CK4 RK 007M2 CK1 RK 007 CK1 RK 007M1 CK1 RK 007M2 CK1 —Seat tir — Seat_ C� `O 0-ring — Disc — Assembly — Spring — Bah Seder 007 Sizes: 1/2" 1" RK 007 CK4 SS RK 007M1 CK4 SS RK 007 CK1 SS RK 007 CK2 SS RK 007M1 CK1 SS RK 007M1 CK2 SS Seat o - ring, Disc assembly, Size '/2" s/4 —Check 3/ 1 /z" - 2" 1'h " -2" 11/2" 3/4 " -1 1 - 2" 1Y " -2" 1 - 2" 1Y " -2" Spring, Check EDP No. Cover Kit 1047053 1047382 1047394 1047001 1047112 1047099 When ordering specify EDP No., Kit No., and Valve Size. xt. Kit No. 887195 RK 007 C 887379 RK SS007 C 887039 RK 007M2 C 887380 RK SS007M2 C 887381 RK SS007M1 C 887036 RK 007 C 887038 RK 007M1 C 887037 RK 007 C 887191 RK 007M1 C 887722 RK 007M2.0 Kit consist of: Cover and Cover o - ring. Complete Rubber Parts 99AB47 DC7CA47 99BA47 99E447 DCFA47 DCE447 -P Cover Cover 0-ring 0 Retainer Size '/2' 1 /2' 3 /4" 3 /a Body 1" 3/4 - 1 " 1" 007M1 11/2" 007M2 887194 RK 007 RT Y" 887378 RK SS007 RT 1/2" 887394 RK SS007M2 RT 3 /4" 887043 RK 007M2 RT 3 /4" 887374 RK SS007M1 RT 1" 887040 RK 007 RT 887042 RK 007M1 RT 3 /4" - 1" 887041 RK 007 RT 11/2" - 2" 887188 RK 007M1 RT 887721 - RK 007M2 RT 11/2" Kit consist of: Cover o -ring, Two disc assemblies and Two seat o -rings. Retainer 1 h" 007 3 /4 "- 1"M1 007 3 /4 "M2 007 11/2"- 2" 007 11/2"- 2 "M1 007 11/2" M2 007 1 Series 007 /007DCDA ?" Double Check Valve/ 1 Double Check Detector Assembly Sizes 2 "- 3" 1 1 Check Assemblies cD Spring Retainer L 1 1 1 fir 1 1 1 1 EDP No. First Check Kit 1 1 4 J 1 1 Repair Kits: vs \ e Qa gs se � \ G 0 ' Kit No. Size 887980 RK 007DCDA CK1 2" 887285 RK 007 CK1 21/2", 3" 887965 RK 007DCDA CK1 21/2", 3" Kit consist of: Seat, Seat o -ring, Disc assembly, Spring, Spring retainer, Check cage and Cover o -ring. Second Check Kit 887981 RK 007DCDA CK2 2" 887286 RK 007 CK2 21 ", 3" 887966 RK 007DCDA CK2 21/2", 3" _ Kit consist of: Seat, Seat o -ring, Disc assembly, Spring, Spring retainer, Check cage and Cover o -ring. First and Second Check Rubber Parts 887982 RK 007DCDA RT 2" 887287 RK 007 RT 887967 RK 007DCDA RT 2 ", 3" Kit consist of: Two seat discs, Two seat o -rings, and Cover o -ring. Cover • '0" Ring Retainer ot 4 1e , li edsr ni y •_. a 1 -' Q When ordering specify EDP No., Kit No., and Valve Size. iL Se °o t " 1" r S¢ EDP No. Cover Kit Kit No. Size 887983 RK 0070CDA C 2" 887288 IRK 007 C 21 ", 3" 887970 IRK 007DCDA C 2 3" Kit consist of: Cover, cover o - ring. Seat Kit 887984 RK 007DCDA Si 2" 887985 RK 007DCDA S2 2" 887289 RK 007 51 887290 RK 007 S2 887968 IRK 007DCDA 51 2 /2", 3" 887969 RK 007DCDA S2 Kit consist: Seat, Seat o -ring and cover o -ring. 9 T E C H Controllers that lead the way... When durability and ease-of-operation are paramount, Rain Bird's RC -C Series controllers are the best choice. Featuring independent station timing, a master valve /pump start circuit, and a key - locking, weatherproof cabinet, it's little wonder that this is the industry's leading commercial - grade electromechanical irrigation controller. Features • Independent station timing knobs • 24 -hour clock (automatic starts on any hour except midnight) • Easy, at- a- glance programming • Master valve /remote pump start circuit • Master on /off switch • Nipple- mounted internal transformer • Easy- access terminal strip • Key - locking, weatherproof cabinet • UL listed Operating Specifications • Station timing: RC- 4C /RC -7C: 3 -60 minutes in 1- minute increments. RC- 1260C: 6 -60 minutes in 2- minute increments. • Automatic starts: 1 to 23 per day • Programming schedule: 14 -day calendar dial for every -day, every -other -day starts, etc., for a 2 -week period. Electrical Characteristics • Input required: 117 VAC ±10% ' 0.45A, 60 Hz or 220/240/260V ±10% @ 0.45A, 50 Hz • Output: 26.5 VAC, 60 Hz or 50 Hz, 1.5A • Reset circuit breaker: 2.1A holding, 3.OA break • Multi -valve station capacity: Up to three 24 VAC, 7VA solenoid valves per station when master valve /pump start circuit is used: four valves per station when master valve /pump start circuit is not used. Models Dimensions • Width: 11 (29,2 cm) • Height: 9 (24,8 cm) • Depth: 63/4 " (17,1 cm) Optional Features • PED -RCC Pedestal and Adapter Mounting Kit • ADP -RCC Adapter for pipe pedestal • RC-4C: 4 stations • RC -7C: 7 stations • RC- 1260C.: 12 stations" ' Available in 50 Hz model. S P E C S RC -C Series Controllers How to Specify . RC -126OC Number Model Stations Revision Code Maximum Siphon Time This specifies an R.7-1260C controller: 12 stations; indoor or outdoor mountable. Note: For non -U.S applications it is necessary to specify 50Hz or 60Hz RA /N4tB /RD Specifications The irrigation system controller shall be an electromechanical type, capable of fully automatic or manual operation of the system. it shall be housed in a wall /pedestal mountable heavy -duty, key -lock cabinet. The controller shall be weatherproof for outdoor installation. The controller shall operate on a 117 VAC ± 10 %, 60 Hz, power input and shall be capable of operating a total of four 24 VAC, or three 24 VAC solenoid valves per station when the master valve /pump start circuit is used. The controller shall have a reset circuit breaker to protect it from power overload. The controller shall have _ stations. The 4 station and 7 station models shall have time setting knobs capable of omitting the station from an irrigation cycle, or being set for incrementally variable timing from 3 to 60 minutes per station, in 1 minute increments. The 12 station model shall have time setting knobs capable of omitting the station from an irrigation cycle or being set for incrementally variable timing from 6 to 60 minutes per station, in 2 minute increments. The controller shall have a 14 -day calendar dial with captive pins for setting the program start days, and a 24 -hour clock dial with 23 captive hour pins for programming 1 to 23 automatic start times per day. A master on /off switch shall permit system shutdown for rainy weather or maintenance, while retaining the program. The controller shall have a rnaster valve /pump start circuit for use with a master valve to pressurize the system when the irrigation cycle starts, or to activate a remote pump start relay to run the pump during the irrigation cycle. The controller shall be as manufactured by Rain Bird Sprinkler Mfg. Corp., Glendora, California. ® Recycled Paper. Rain Bird. Conserving More Than Water @ Registered Trademark of Rain Bird Sprinkler Mfg. Corp. 0995 Ram Bird Sprinkler Mfg Corp. 1/95 Electromechanical Controllers RC -4C, RC -7C, RC-1260C knonene UMW (AM.., ., RAIN BMA PREFERRED BY PROFESSIONALS WORLDWIDE Rain Bird Sales, Inc. - Commercial Division 4261 South Country Club Road, Tucson. AZ 85714 Phone: 520-741-6100 Fax: 520-741-6146 Specification Hotline: 800- 458 -3005 D37034 PAIN&B/pD I*�/. !`ERRED MY PROFESSIONALS WORLDWIDE ® `' IA S T R PARTS LIST MECHANICAL CONTROLLER RC -4C / RC -7C / RC -1260C Green and Gray Versions 000PYRICIIT 19q2 RAIN BIRD SPRINKLER .+1FG. CORD Ref. Description 10 14 15 16 17 18 17 Green Version INSURE QUALITY - USE ONLY GENUINE RAIN BIRD PARTS Catalog No.: 703 Date: 2/95 Page: 1 of 3 I Gray Version RC-4C -Green RC -7C -Green RC- 1260C -Gm RC-4C -Gray RC -7C -Gray RC- 1260C -Gry Case Replacement Kit (Gray Only) (A)631773 (A)631773 (A)631773 631773 631773 631773 1 Case 1 (628661) (628661) (628661) (631161) (631161) (631161 2 Case Gasket 1 627100 627100 627100 627100 627100 627100 ) 3 Lock Strike (B) 1 (627009) (627009) (627009) (627009) (627009) (627009 4 Screw, Tamper Proof No. 4 (B) 2 (627169) (627169) (627169) (627169) 627169 ) 5 Washer, Flat No. 4 (B) 2 (623261) (623261) ( ) (627169) 6 Washer. Lock No 4 (B) 2 (650158-03) ) (623261) (623261) (623261) (623261) 7 Nut, Hex 4 x 40 No 2 ) (650158 -03) (650158 -03) (650158 -03) (650158 -03) (650158-03) 8 Wiring Label (C) 1 (650034 -02) (650034 -02) (650034 -02) (650034 -02) (650034 -02) (650034 -02) (629920) (629919) (630150) (631206) (631195) Cover Replacement Kit(Gray Only) (A)631774 (A)631774 (A)631774 631774 (631167) 631774 631774 9 Cover 10 Hinge Pin 1 (627008) (627008) (627008) (631163) (631163) (631163) 1 11 Cam Lock w /Dust Cover (6) 1 (623941) (623941) (623941) (623941) (623941) (623941) 12 Arrow Lock (B) (626974 -02) (626974 -02) (626974 -02) (626974 -02) (626974 -02) (626974 -02} Keys (B) ) 2 (627094) (627094) (627094) (627094) 622823 (627094) (627094) 1 622823 622823 622823 622823 622823 13A Model Identification Label (C) 1 (629922) (629644) (630154) (631180) (631168 13B Instruction Label (English) (C) 1 629559 629559 629559 ) (631165) 13B Instruction Label (Spanish) (C) 1 629773 629773 629773 (631668) (631668) (631668) 14 Transformer - 120VAC 60 Hz (630410) (630410) (630410) ( ) 1 628425 628425 628425 628425 628425 628425 14 Transformer - 220/240VAC (50 Hz) .1 628426 628426 628426 628426 628426 628426 15 Washer. Flat 7/8 1 (650023 -43) (650023 -43) (650023 -43) (650023 -43) (650023-43) (65 01 3) 16 Locknut, Conduit 1 17 Screw, Pan HD 6 -18 x 5/8 (628013) (628013) (628013) (628013) (628013) (628013) 2 (650242 -26) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) 18 Terminal Block 1 650459 -12 650459 -12 650459 -16 650459 -12 650459 -12 650459 -16 19 Connection Assy P -1 1 629906 629905 630151 629906 629905 20 12 Pin Plug W /Ears Molex 1 (622983} (622983) - (622983) (622893) 630151 20 15 Pin Plug W /Ears Molex 1 — - 624439 21 Contact Pins Molex 8 or 13 622984 622984 622980 — 624439 Screw, Pan HD 6 -18 x 5/8 G 622984 622984 622984 4 1650242-26) (650242 -26) (650242 -261 (650242 -26) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) Note: Part Numbers enclosed in brackets ( 1 are not available individually, but may be sold in assemblies or kits. RAINBIRD MASTER PARTS LIST PREfERREO •V PRO fESSIONAIS WORLDWIDE MECHANICAL CONTROLLER RC -4C / RC -7C / RC -1260C Green and Gray Versions Ref. Descnption ' O COPYRIGHT I912 RI CIRD�I•RI�'FI -ER INSURE QUALITY - USE ONLY GENUINE RAIN BIRD PARTS \IFG FE CORP Catalog No.: 703 Date: 2/95 Page: 2 of 3 RC-4C -Green RC -7C -Green RC- 1260C -Grn RC-4C -Gray RC -7C -Gray RC- 1260C -Gry Front Panel Assembly - 60 Hz 1 (629898) (624236 -03) 628997 -05 631193 -01 631192 -01 631179 -01 Front Panel Assembly - 50 Hz 1 (629897) (624287 -02) (628998 -05) (631193 -02) (631192 -02) 631179 -02 22 Cover, Station Dial 1 (624285) (624285) (624285) (630473) (630473) (630473) 23 Drive Stud 3 (622906) (622906) (622906) — — — 24 Lock Nut 1/4 x 20 1 (650277) (650277) (650277) (650277) (650277) (650277) 25 Station Dial Assembly 1 (629884) 622877 -01 622877 -03 630800 630792 630420 26 Screw 7 -19 x 112 4 or 6 (622922) (622922) (622922) (622922) (622922) (622922) 27 Station Indicator Knob Assembly 4,7,12 622941 622941 622941 630447 630447 630447 28 Pin .093 x .50 (Dowel) 1 (622928) (622928) (622928) (622928) (622928) (622928) 29 Circuit Breaker Shaft Extension 1 622899 622899 622899 (630955) (630955) (630955) 30 Retaining Ring 1 (622904) (622904) (622904) — — — 31 Washer, Shim 1/4 1 650023 -18 650023 -18 650023 -18 650023 -18 650023 -18 650023 -18 32 Washer. Spring 1 (623264) (623264) (623264) (623264) (623264) (623264) 33 Station Dial Shaft Assembly 1 622888 622888 624412 628825 628825 629307 34 Station Dial Switch Bracket Assy 1 623666 623666 623666 623666 623666 623666 35 Micro Switch, 10 Amp 1 601802 601802 601802 601802 601802 601802 36 Screw. 4 -24 x 5/8 2 (622927) (622927) (622927) (622927) (622927) (622927) 37 Screw, Round Head 8 -32 x 7/8 1 (650105-48) (650105-48) (650105-48) (650105 -48) (650105 -48) (650105 -48) 38 Washer, Flat No.8 2 (650023 -10) (650023 -10) (650023 -10) (650023 -10) (650023 -10) (650023-10) 39 Screw, Pan HD 6 -18 x 5/8 1 (650242 -26) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) 40 Station Switch Spring 1 (622948) (622948) (622948) (622948) (622948) (622948) 41 Lock Washer No. 8 (Internal Star) 1 (650158 -06) (650158 -06) (650158 -06) (650158 -06) (650158 -06) (650158-06) 42 Speed Nut 8-32 1 (623644) (623644) (623644) (623644) (623644) (623644) 43 Day Dial Assembly 1 622867 622867 622867 630595 -02 630595 -02 630595 -02 44 Dial Pins 14 622866 622866 622866 622866 622866 622866 45 Retaining Ring 1 (622887) (622887) (622887) (622887) (622887) (622887) 46 Day Dial Switch Bracket Assy 1 623664 623664 623664 623664 623664 623664 47 Micro Switch, 10Amp 1 600731 600731 600731 600731 600731 600731 48 Screw. 4 x 5/8 2 (622927) (622927) (622927) (622927) (622927) (622927) 49 Washer, Flat No 8 1 (650023 -10) (650023 -10) (650023 -10) (650023 -10) (650023 -10) (650023 -10) 50 Washer, Lock No. 6 (External Star) 1 (650162 -02) (650162 -02) (650162 -02) (650162 -02) (650162 -02) (650162 -02) 51 Screw, Pan HD 6 -18 x 5/8 2 (650242 -26) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) 52 Hour Dial Assembly 1 622864 622864 622864 630415 630415 630415 53 Dial Pins 23 622866 622866 622866 622866 622866 622866 54 Hour Dial Spring 1 (623291) (623291) (623291) (623291) (623291) (623291) 55 Cotter Pin 1 (622933) (622933) (622933) (622933) (622933) (622933) 56 Hour Dial Shaft Assembly 1 622881 622881 622681 628828 628828 628828 57 Hour Dial Switch Bracket Assy 1 623665 623665 623665 623665 623665 623665 58 Micro Switch, 10Amp 1 600731 600731 600731 600731 600731 600731 59 Screw. 4 x 518 2 (622927) (622927) (622927) (622927) (622927) (622927) 60 Washer, Flat No.8 1 (650023 -10) (650023 -10) (650023 -10) (650023 -10) (650023 -10) (650023 -10) 11 61 Washer, Lock No. 6 (External Star) 1 (650162 -02) (650162 -02) (650162 -02) (650162 -02) (650162 -02) (650162 -02) 62 Screw, Pan HD 6 -18 x 5/8 2 (650242-26) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) i 63 Slide Switch. SPDT 1 600643 600643 600643 600643 600643 600643 — 64 Screw Pan HD 6 -18 x 3/16 2 (622926) (622926) (622926) — — 65 Pivot Shaft Assembly 1 622894 622894 624438 628826 628826 629308 66 Pivot Shaft Spring 1 (622903) (622903) (622903) — — — 67 Pivot Shaft Spring 1 — — — (622948) (622948) (622948) P68 Reduction Gear Shaft Assembly 1 622891 622891 622891 628827 628827 628827 69 Plate, Gear 1 627170 627170 627170 627170 627170 627170 70 Ciruit Breaker. 3.67Amp 1 623687 623687 623687 623687 623687 623687 71 Timing Motor - 60 Hz 1 622874 622874 622874 622874 622874 622874 71 Timing Molar -50 Hz 1 623643 623643 623643 623643 623643 623643 III 72 Rapid Advance Motor - 501 60 Hz 1 625429 625429 625429 625429 625429 625429 Resistor 43 OHM. 5 W, 10% 1 625020 625020 625020 625020 625020 625020 Screw 6 x.312 3 (627632) (627632) (627632) (627632) (627632) (627632) Bolt 6 -32 x 318 1 (650105 -28) (650105-28) (650105 -28) (650105-28) 1650105 -28) (650105 -28) P Washer. Lock No. 6 (External Star) 1 (650162-02) (650162 -02) (650162 -02) (650162 -02) (650162 -02) (650162 -02) Note: Part Numbers enclosed in brackets ( ) are not available individually but may be sold in assemblies or kits. 1 RA/A4B/RD MAST PREFERRED SY PROFESSIONALS WORLDWIDE ® ER PARTS LIST MECHANICAL CONTROLLER RC -4C / RC -7C / RC -1260C Green and Gray Versions Ref. Description Nut 6 -32 1 73 Screw, Self Tap 4 -24 2 Station Slector Switch (Edge Card) 1 Hamess Assembly 1 74 Station Selector Switch (Round) 1 12 Pin Receptacle W /Ears (RC -4/7) 1 15 Pin Receptacle W /Ears (RC -12 Only) 1 Cable Tie (RC4/7- 16,RC1260 -18) 16,18 Contact Pin, Male 1 75 Washer No. 8 4 76 Screw, Pan HD 6 -18 x 5/8 4 23 (A) (B) (C) 22 44 27 24 25 28 O COPYRIGHT 19Q? RAIN BIRD SPRINKI. LR .1FG CORP Green version no longer available. However. comparable gray version may be substituted. Included in LK -712 Lock Replace Kit 1 F69520 F69520 F69520 Included In Label Kit 1 (A)631777 (A)631777 (A)631777 Instruction Manual 1 629950 629950 629950 43 26 53 52 54 29 30 31 32 Note: Part Numbers enclosed in brackets 36 35 38 37 RC-4C -Green RC -7C -Green RC- 1260C -Gm (650034 -03) (650034 -03) (650104 -01) (650104 -01) 629813 628273 629804 622921 (622982) (622982) 650131 650131 622984 622984 (650023 -10) (650023 -10) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) 67 66 63 64 33 65 70 38 39 55 (650034 -03) (650104 -01) 629692 624277 624440 650131 622984 (650023 -10) (650242 -26) 45 41 42 RC -4C -Gray F69520 631777 629950 56 59 58 1 75 76 72 74 73 71 INSURE QUALITY - USE ONLY GENUINE RAIN BIRD PARTS Catalog No.: 703 Date: 2/95 Page: 3 of 3 (650034 -03) (650034 -03) (650034 -03) (650104 -01) (650104 -01) (650104 -01) (630984) (630930) (630931) 632233 632236 632239 629804 622921 624277 (622982) (622982) — 624440 650131 650131 650131 622984 622984 622984 (650023 -10) (650023 -10) (650023 -10) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) (650242 -26) Note: PWB style wafer switch was replaced with original round style switch (# 74) after 6/94. However, 68 new harness assembly was designed. 61 60 62 D o 7 76 I RC -7C -Gray RC- 1260C -Gry F69520 631777 629950 50 69 F69520 631777 629950 4847 /49 46 � ;;.p.0 ,„ 51 ) are not available individually, but may be sold in assemblies or kits. 1 Installation and Operating Instructions 1 1 Safety Information Warning! Important safety information and warning messages appear throughout this manual. To ensure correct oper- ation and to avoid additional expense, read this manual thoroughly before you begin installation. Operating this equipment in a residential area can cause interference to radio and television reception. The radio frequency energy emitted by this device complies with limits for a Class B computing device, described in FCC Rules Part 15, Subpart J. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Welcome to Rain Bird 1 The RC-C and RC -AB Series Controllers 1 Special Features 2 Packing List 3 Chapter 1: Installation 5 Mounting the Controller 5 Before You Begin 5 Choosing a location 5 What you will need 7 Removing the Controller's Faceplate 8 RC-C model 8 RC -AB model 8 Mounting the Controller on the Wall 9 Connecting the Controller 10 Connecting to the Field Valves 10 Connecting to the Main Power Source 13 RC-C model 13 RC -AB model 14 Converting Stations from B Program to A Program (RC -AB models only) 15 Putting the Controller Back Together 16 Checking the Electrical System 16 Chapter 2: Operation 19 Familiarizing Yourself with the Controller's Faceplate 20 Setting the Controller's Clock 22 Setting Up Automatic Operation 23 Operating the Controller 25 Operating Automatically 25 Operating Manually 25 Using Rain Shutdown 26 Troubleshooting 27 Glossary of Terms 29 /\ Table of Contents (continued) r y Service Information 30 Quick Reference 31 in-:ide back cover Warranty Introduction Welcome to Rain Bird Thank you for purchasing your new Rain Bird controller. For more than six decades. Rain Bird has led the irrigation ir.t:ustry in meeting all of your water mana�;ernent nee:'.s Pv providing the high- est quality product_ and services available. Your new Rain Bir;: _•antrolle_• :s _ie_ie.ned to give you a lifetime of on -site '.watering control. The RC - C and RC - AB Series Controllers The RC -C and RC -AB series controllers are stand -alone controllers appropriate for residential or commercial use. This easy -to -use controller offers automatic operation of up to 23 watering stations on the RC -AB and uo to l2 watering stations on the RC -C. RC-A13 RC.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Introduction (continued) Special Features The RC -C controller is available as a wall -mount (WM) model with 4, 7, or 12 station capability. The RC -AB controller is available as a wall -mount model (WM) with 18 or 23 station capability. An optional pedestal is available, if desired. For information about pedestals, contact your Rain Bird distributor. All RC-C and RC -AB models have the following special features: • Weatherproof, locking cabinet • Easy, at -a -glance programming • Independent station timing • 24 -hour clock • Master valve /remote pump start circuit • UL listed • Master on /off switch • Electro- mechanical reliability Introduction (continued) Packing List Please check to make sure that you have all the items on the list. If any item is missing or damaged, contact your Rain Bird distributor. 1 Pre - assembled Controller in a Wall Cabinet 2 Keys 1 Installation and Operating Instructions Manual 1 Three - year Warranty Card 1 Quick Reference Peel - off Label Warranty RC -C Spanish Label OR 3 Chapter 1: Installation This section of the manual explains how to mount your new RC -C or RC -AB controller on the wall and how to connect the wiring. Mounting the Controller Before You Begin Important: Before installing your controller, make sure that the area around you is free from dirt and dust and that your hands and arms are clean. This will avoid contamination of the controller's internal parts. Warning! Do not let water or other liquids come in contact with any part inside the metal cabinet. Choosing a location When choosing the best location to install your wall -mount controller, please consider the following: ✓ Warning! This controller must be installed in compliance with local electrical codes. ✓ Select a sheltered area, protected from vandalism, where the user can easily reach the con- troller. ✓ Select a location that has access to 120 volt AC electrical power (or the proper electrical supply voltage outside the United States). ✓ Choose a flat, stable, vertical surface, where you cart mount the controller. Allow sufficient con- duit clearance for the electrical connections at the bottom of the metal cabinet. ✓ If you are installing an RC -C model, allow 14" (35.9 cm) minimum clearance for the hinged cabinet door to swing fully to the left; if you are installing an RC -AB model, allow 19" (48.3 cm) for the door to swing fully to the right. /\ 5 1 1 1 1 Chapter 1: Instillation (continued) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r t = 1 1 Typical Indoor Wall -mount Installations To Fuss Box • 14• (36 eml mwmum 120 Von AC W1r1ng in Conduit and Housry )1 -112 • 129.2 cm( Valve Wiring 1n Conduit 16-112 (47 an) 16 -114• (41.3 cm) 20'(61 cm( minimum RC -C RC -AB Chapter 1: Installation (continued) What you will need Before you begin installation, you will need the following tools: ✓ Phillips Head Screwdriver ✓ Slotted Head Screwdriver v' Slotted Thin Blade Screwdriver v' Wire Strippers ✓ Lineman's Pliers ✓ Needlenose Pliers ✓ Tape Measure ✓ Marking Pencil ✓ Electric Drill (or Hammer Drill if installing in masonry or concrete wall) ✓ Nut Driver 8 Chapter 1: Installation (continued) Removing the Controller's Faceplate To mount the controller, you must first remove the door and faceplate. To do so, RC - C model 1. Remove the controller cabinet door from its hinges by opening the door, then pushing the metal pin inside the hinge up and out of the hinge. Set the door and pin aside. 2. Using a phillips head screwdriver, remove the tour screws that hold the faceplate to the cabinet. Save the screws for reassembly later. Gently lift the faceplate a few inches out of the cabinet. 3. Disconnect the terminal block wires by grasping the ends of the white wire connec- tor and pulling firmly. Set the faceplate aside. RC - AB model 1. Remove the controller cabinet door from its two hinges by opening the door, then hold- ing the bottom of the door and sliding up. Using a tlat -blade screwdriver, remove the two screws that hold the faceplate. Then open the faceplate panel all the way; hold the bottom of the panel and slide it up off of its two hinges. Gently lift the faceplate a few inches away from the cabinet. RC-AB Step 1 - Chapter 1: Installation (continued) 3. Disconnect the four different red and white wire connectors by grasping the ends of each connector and pulling firmly. Set the faceplate aside. RC -AB Step 3 Mounting the Controller on the Wall 1. Pick up the controller cabinet. If you have an RC -AB model. use a thin -blade screw- driver to push out the three plastic plugs at the back of the cabinet. If you have an RC -C model, the holes are not plugged. 2. Place the back of the controller onto your mounting surface and mark the holes with _ a pencil. (In some packages, a template is provided.) 3. Drill the holes and mount the cabinet, installing the two top screws first. The hardware you need will vary according to the kind of mounting surface. (In some packages, hardware is provided.) Mounting Step 1 9 1 Chapter 1: Installation (continued) Connecting the Controller There are two types of connections you must make to your RC-C or RC -AB controller: • connections to the field valves and • connections to the main power source. If you have an RC -AB model, you may also wish to convert B- program stations to A -pro- gram stations. This section of the manual contains instructions for each of these types of connections. A wiring chart is included on page 12 and a wiring dia- gram is provided on the inside of the controller cabinet for easy reference. Important: All wiring must be installed and con- nected In accordance with local codes. Connections to the Field Valves The controller provides 26.5 VAC output for the station valves on the RC-C and 24 VAC out- put for the station valves on the RC -AB. The output wires are color -coded and stamped with station designations. See the charts on page 12 for wiring details on the model you are installing. Both RC -C and RC -AB models are capable of operating up to four 2 -watt solenoid valves on each station when the master valve circuit is not in use. When the master valve circuit is in 10 use by a 2 -watt solenoid, three valves per sta- tion may be used. If the master valve is in use by a thermal hydraulic or an ATH adapter valve, only two valves per station may be used. Important: The wires you use to connect the controller to the field valves must be approved for underground use. See the Rain Bird catalog for exact wire specifications. Important: Do not install the valve wires in the same conduit as the wires to the main power source. To connect the valve wires, 1. Feed each valve wire up through the large hole on the bottom of the controller cabinet. 2. Strip 1/2" (1.27 cm) from the end of the valve wires. Connect one valve wire from each valve to the appropriate station wire or station terminal (depending upon the controller model). If you are connecting to station wires, strip 1/2" (1.27 cm) from the end of the station wires and use wire nuts; if you are connecting to terminals, secure the valve wire with the screw on the termi- nal strip. 3. Connect the controller's valve common wire or station terminal to each valve's sec- ond wire. Follow the instructions included with the valves. Chanter 1: installation i continued i 4. Record the valve locations for each station on the label inside the cabinet door. 5. If you are using a master valve or pump start relay and you have an RC-C model, connect one wire from the master valve or pump start relay to the controller's master valve wire or terminal. Connect the other master valve wire to the controller's com- mon wire or terminal. OR If you are using a master valve or pump start relay and you have an RC -AB model, connect the wires from the master valve or pump start relay to the controller's yeiow pump start wires. RC -C master valve connection • Cleo - '1 C €11. 0,1coo.e4e•AileePs Important: If you are not using a master valve, and the controller is a model that has a master valve wire or designated pump start wire, tape the end of the wire with electrical tape to pre- vent a short. Important: If you are using a pump start relay on a master valve circuit, and an unused pump is turned on by accident, the pump may overheat or a pipe may burst. If you have any unused sta- tions, we recommend that you have a pressure relief valve or have a demand switch on the pump rather than using the controller as the pump start. RC -AB master valve connection 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 RC-C Wiring Chart Station Color 1 Brown 2 Red 3 ; Orange 4 5 11 12 Master Valve Valve Common Master Valve Valve Common Yellow Green 6 Blue 7 Violet 8 Gray 9 •White 10 White/Slack White/Drown White/Red Slack White White/Orange None 1 Chapter 1: Installation (continued) RC-AB Wiring Chart for Upper Controller Station Color PGM 1 Brown 2 Red 3 Orange 4 Yellow A 5. , Green A 6 7 8 10 11 12 A A A Blue A Violet A Not Used A 9 White A White/Black A White/Brown A Valve Common = Whits/Violet/Green RC-AB Wiring Chart for Lower Controller Station Color PGM 12 Wh ite/Red 6 13 Vilhits/Orange 5 14 White/Yellow . 5 15 White/Green 16 . White/Slue 17 WhiteNiolet 18 Whits/Gray 19 WhiteNiolet/Slack 21 WhiteNlolet/Brown 22 WhiteMolet/Red Valve Common = WhiteMolei/Green 5 5 5 20 WhiteNlolet/Gray 5 23 WhitsNiolet/Orange ; 6 Chapter 1: Installation (continued) Connecting to the Main Power Source After you have connected the valve wires, you must connect the controller to the main power source. Important: The wires that connect the controller to the main power source must be installed in a conduit other than the one that contains the field wires. RC -C model The power input wires for the standard 117 volt, 60 Hz /AC transformer are black, white, and green. The international version 220 volt, 50 Hz wires are black, white, green, and brown. These wires exit the controller through the small hole at the bottom of the cabinet. To connect the power input wires to the main power source, 1. Connect a junction box to the transformer nipple. To do this, place the junction box on, then thread a washer on the nipple. Twist it to tighten. 2. If you have the standard 117 volt, 60 Hz model, strip 1/2" (1.27 cm) from the ends of the wires and use wire nuts to connect the black wire to the power source hot wire, the white wire to the common wire, and the green wire to the ground wire. Or, if you have a 220 volt, 50 Hz model, strip 1/2" (1.27 cm) from the ends of the wires and use wire nuts to connect the white wire to the power source common wire, the black wire to the power source hot wire, and the green wire to the ground wire. Isolate the brown wire by capping the wire end with a wire nut and wrapping it with electrical tape. 3. Close the junction box and install a conduit for the wires from the power source to the junction box. RC-C main power connections 1 ^ J Chapter 1: Installation (continued) RC -AB model The power input wires for the 117 volt, 60 Hz /AC transformer are black, white, and green. These wires are housed in the metal box inside the controller cabinet. To connect the power input wires to the main power source, 1. Using a phillips head screwdriver, remove the three screws from the metal box inside the controller cabinet. 2. Strip 1/2" (1.27 cm) from the ends of the wires and use wire nuts to connect the black wire to the power source hot wire and the white wire to the common wire. 3. Close the metal box and install a conduit for the wires from the power source to the controller. 14 RC -AB main power connections 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Chapter 1: Installation (continue:: Converting Stations from B- program to A- program (RC -AB controllers only) On the RC -AB model controllers, the pins on the DAY dial have three possible positions: the out position eliminates watering, the half-way out position waters on the A- program sched- ule, and the in position waters on both the A- and B- program schedules. Your controller comes from the factory with some stations set as A- program stations and others as B- program stations. See the chart on page 12 for the settings on your controller model. To convert a B- program station to an A- program station, 1. On the back of the controller's faceplate, cut the wire on the top module labeled "CUT WIRE FOR A- DAY." 2. Cut the specific station wire or wires you want to change on the bottom module. These wires are also labeled "CUT WIRE FOR A -DAY" and each is marked with the appropriate station number. Cut only the wires of the stations you want to change. Conver.:ng o . -- rograrrm Putting the Controller Back Together Congratulations! You have completed the mounting and wiring of your new controller. To put the controller back together, 1. Reconnect the wire connectors (one connec- tor on RC -C models and four connectors on RC -AB models). 2. Place the controller's face plate back into the cabinet and repiace the screws (four screws on RC -C models and two screws on RC -AB models). 3. Re- attach the controller door to its hinges. 1S 1 16 1 1 Chap ter 1: Installation I continued) Checking the Electrical System It is a good idea to chuck that the controller is working and all the connections have been made properly. To do so, 1. Rotate the STATION SELECTOR dial (or dials if you have the RC -AB model) coun- terclockwise to the REST position at the top directly under the STATION; indicator. 2. Place all pins on the HOUR and DAY dials in the out position by pulling them out gen- tly. On RC -AB models, pull pins out to the ;. "all the way out" position. STATION SELECTOR dial in REST position Turn on the main power to the controller and place the MODE switch in the ON or ALTO ;position depending ,mn the controller model you have. 4. On the STATION SELECTOR dial, adjust each station knob to the ten - minute mark except for the last station on the upper con- trol module of any RC -AB model. Do this by tuning each of the knobs until the indi- cator arrow points to the mark half way between OFF and 20. Rotate the STATION SELECTOR dial coun- terclockwise until Station 1 is opposite the STATION indicator. (If you have an RC -AB model, rotate only the upper dial.) STATION SELECTOR dial in Station 1 position Chapter 1: Installation (continued) The controller will automatically take the STATION dial through each watering sta- tion and each station will operate for ten minutes. If you have a problem with the operation of your controller, check the Troubleshooting sec- tion of this manual on page 27. If you have a problem you cannot fix on your own, call Rain Bird Technical Service at 1 - 800 - 247 - 3782 and we will be glad to help you. Chapter 2: Operation Using the dials on the controller's faceplate, you can set up your RC-C or RC -AB controller to operate automatically. You can also run the controller manually without making changes in the program or programs you have set. This chapter will guide you through the use of the controller's dials and will give you step -by -step instructions for setting up automatic operation to suit your needs, as well as instructions for oper- ating the controller manually and using Rain Shutdown. /\ 19 Chapter 2. Operation (continued) Familiarizing Yourself with the Controller's Faceplate Before beginning to program or operate your controller, take a moment to familiarize yourself with the controller's faceplate. The follocving page contains a short description of each or the dials and knobs. Specific instructions for the operations you can perform begin on page 22. 20 s 6 PC -A3 • Chapter 2: Operation (continued) 1. HOUR DIAL Push or pull the HOUR dial's 23 pins for scheduling automatic starts on any hour except mid night. 2. DAY DIAL Push or pull the DAY dial's 1.1 pins to schedule watering every day or any day within a two - week range. Each pin represents a 24 -hour period beginning at midnight. 3. STATION SELECTOR DIAL Rotate the STATION SELECTOR dial to the REST position to discontinue watering; rotate it to a station to begin watering that station. This dial rotates automatically during a water cycle and the station currently watering appears at the top of the dial under the STATION indicator. 4. STATION TIME KNOBS Turn these knobs to set how long each station will water. Use the OFF position to eliminate the station from the watering schedule. 5. MODE SWITCH Set the MODE switch to AUTO or ON (depending upon the model you have) for automatic or manual watering. Set the switch to OFF to use Rain Shutdown without interrupting the clock. 6. CIRCUIT BREAKER RESET BUTTON Push the circuit breaker reset button to reset the controller after a shutdown occurs and you have located and corrected the source of the outage. 7. CURRENT STATION INDICATOR The STATION indicator shows the station currently watering. 8. CURRENTTIME INDICATOR The TIME indicator show the current time on the controller's clock. 9. CURRENT DAY INDICATOR The DAY indicator shows the current day of the watering schedule. 21 ' 22 1 1 Chapter 2: HOUR dial set to 1:35 P.M. Setting the Controller's Clock r er a of i c.ontinueo.) To schedule automatic watering, you must first set the controller's internal clock. To do so, 1. With the main power on, place the MODE switch in the OFF position. Rotate the HOUR dial clockwise so that the current time is at the top of the dial, oppo- site the TIME indicator. Make sure that you set the time to the appropriate AM or PM setting. For example, if you want to set the time to 1:35 p.m., rotate the dial so that the TIME indicator is half way between the 1 and the 2 on the afternoon side of the dial. 3. Rotate the DAY dial counterclockwise so that the appropriate day letter is at the bot- tom of the dial, opposite the DAY indicator. 4. Rotate the STATION SELECTOR dial coun- terclockwise so that the REST position is at the top of the dial, opposite the STATION indicator. If you have an RC -AB model, rotate both top and bottom STATION SELECTOR dials. 5. Proceed to "Setting Up Automatic Operation" on the next page. Rotating the DAY Dial • , ..wyr P. J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Chapter 2: Operation (continued) Setting Up Automatic Operation Before setting up automatic operation, make sure that the HOUR and DAY dials are set to the correct time and that all the pins are in the out position. If you have an RC -A3 model, the pins on the DAY dial should be all the way out. There are three settings you must complete in order to set up automatic operation: • the days on which vou want to water, • the start times for watering, and • the amount of time each station will water. Pushing in the pins on the DAY dial To do so, 1. On the DAY dial, push in the pin or pins corresponding to the days on which you want to water. If vou have an RC -AB model, push the pins half way in to water A- program stations; push the pins all the way in to water on both A- and B- program stations. 2. On the HOUR dial, push in the pin or pins corresponding to the times when you would like to start the watering cycle. Note: You can select multiple start times for one day as long as each time occurs after the completion of the previous watering cycle. Pushing in the pins on the HOUR dial 23 Chapter 2: Operation (continued) Important: A complete watering cycle of all sta- tions must last at least 20 minutes to prevent a second cycle beginning within the same hour. Also, a complete watering cycle of all stations can last no more than 55 minutes if you want to water on the next hour. Important: The last station of the upper con- troller on RC -AB models cannot be used for watering and the pre -set factory time on that sta- tion must not be changed. 3. Turn each STATION! TIME KNOB to the amount of time you want to water that sta- tion. The first dot is the minimum time set- ting and represents three minutes on 30- minute controllers and six minutes on 60- minute controllers. The notches between hash marks represent one minute on 30- Turning a STATION TIME KNOB 24 minute controllers and two minutes on 60- minute controllers. The OFF position removes the station from the watering schedule. Note: The controller skips stations in the OFF posi- tion and immediately advances to the next station in the schedule. 4. Proceed to "Operating the Controller" on the next page. Chapter 2: Operation (continued) Operating the Controller Once you have set up the controller for auto- matic operation, using the controller is easy. You may choose to operate it completely auto- matically or to operate it manually from time to time. When you operate it manually, you don't have to disturb the programmed instructions. Operating Automatically To operate the controller automatically, 1. Set the MODE switch to AUTO or ON, depending upon the model you have. The controller waters automatically accord- ing to the schedule you have set. MODE switch set to AUTO Operating Manually You can water a station or stations manually any time you choose. To do so, 1. Rotate the STATIO\ SELECTOR dial coun- terclockwise until the station you want to water is at the top of the dial, opposite the STATION indicator. The station you have selected will operate for the time set. The remaining stations will follow after the selected station until the STATION dial is in the REST position. Rotating the STATION SELECTOR dial 2 G. 1 1 1 1 1 et 126 1 1 Chapter 2: Operation (continued) Using Rain Shutdown The Rain Shutdown setting allows you to shut down the controller temporarily without inter- rupting the controller's clock. To use Rain Shutdown, 1. Set the MODE switch to OFF. When the controller is in Rain Shutdown, it will not operate automatically or manually. MODE switch sat to OFF STA11 • Troubleshooting Problem: The controller's clock has stopped. Solution: The circuit breaker may have tripped or there may be no power coming into the con- troller. Push the RESET button. If the controller's clock stops again, check the system cir- cuits. Also check the line voltage and connections. Problem: The DAY and HOUR dials are functioning incorrectly. Solution: Check to make sure that the clock is set for the correct time. Also check to make sure that the pins on the HOUR and DAY dials are set correctly and that the total watering cycle time is no less than 20 minutes. Also, if you want to water on consecutive hours, make sure that the total cycle time is no more than 55 minutes. Problem: The DAY and HOUR dials function, but the watering cycle will not start automatically. Solution: Check to make sure that the MODE switch is in the AUTO or ON position, depending upon the model you have. Problem: The controller restarts immediately without stopping in the REST position. Solution: Make sure that the total cycle time is at least 20 minutes (the minimum allowable time). If the total cycle time runs into another start time, adjust the hour pins or change the total cede time. 27 1 1 Troubleshooting (continued) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 28 1 Problem: Some stations will not operate. Solution: Make sure that the station time is not set to OFF and that the time is set to at least three minutes on 30- minute controllers and six minutes on 60- minute controllers. Check the connections between the controller and the valves and check the valve actuators. Problem: The STATION SELECTOR dial won't stop at a station that has time on it. Solution: Make sure that there are at least three minutes set for stations on a 30- minute controller and six minutes for stations on a 60- minute controller. Glossary of Terms • circuit board one of the etched, copper clad sheets of insulating material onto which electronic components and terminals are assembled. Controllers contain circuit boards. • controller a device that sends a 24 VAC power signal to the field solenoid valves. • manual requiring user input, rather than being automatically performed by the PC program. • master valve (MV) an electrically operated valve located on a system's main line that controls the flow of water to all other electric and manual valves downstream of it. • master valve circuit an electrical circuit located on many controllers used to control a master valve. Regardless of what station is on at the controller, the master valve circuit produces voltage to control the master valve. When all of the stations on the controller are off, the master valve circuit turns off. • RC - AB controller a stand -alone controller appropriate for residential or commercial use available in 18 or 23 station capacity with dual programs. • RC - C controller a stand -alone controller appropriate for residential or commercial use available in 4, 7, or 12 station capacity. • solenoid a portion of a field valve that receives a 24 VAC electrical current from the controller. station schedule the watering schedule for one of the stations controlled by the controller. • valve a manual or electrically operated device used to control flow of water in an irrigation system. • watering cycle the complete cycle of watering for all stations controlled by the controller. 29 1 Service Information 1 1 1 1 Phone: (520) 741 -6100 Fax: (520) 741 -6146 1 Rain Bird Specifications Hotline 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 30 1 1 In the unlikely event this equipment should malfunction, all repairs should be performed by an authorized Rain Bird MAXICOM Authorized Service Center. For information on MAXICOM Authorized Service Centers, contact Rain Bird at: Rain Bird Sales, Inc. Turf Products 4261 South Country Club Road Tucson, AZ 85714 1- 800 -458 -3005 Quick Reference Setting the Clock Operating Automatically 1. Turn the MODE switch to OFF. 1. Turn the MODE switch to AUTO or ON. 2. Rotate the HOUR dial to the current time. 3. Rotate the DAY dial to the current day. 4. Rotate the STATION SELECTOR dial to Operating Manually REST. 1. Rotate the STATION SELECTOR dial to the desired station. Setting Up Automatic Operation With the time set and all pins all the wav out, Using Rain Shutdown 1. Turn the MODE switch to OFF. 1. Push in pins on the DAY dial for days to water. (On RC AB models, half wav in waters A- program stations; all the way in waters A- and B -proms am stations.) 2. Push in pins on the HOUR dial for times to water. 3. Turn the knobs on the STATION SELECTOR dial to the amount of time to water each sta- tion. 31 /PA/NB /BPD MASTER PARTS LIST /RE FERRED av PRO FESSIONALS WORLD WIDE (� MANUAL VALVE 2 —PIECE QUICK COUPLERS # 33RC / # 33NP / # 33LCR #44RC / #44NP/ #44LRC/ #55 / #66/ #77 5 Ref. Part Description VALVE ASSEMBLY 7 Upper Body 8 Lock Screw 9 Flange Packing 10 Valve Cage 11 Spring 12 Lower Body 13 Buna -N Disc 14 Disc Retainer 15 Asbestos Washer 16 Retaining Screw O COPYRIGHT 1991 RAIN BIRD SPRINKLER MFG CORP —1 (A) Included in Repair Kit VALVE KEY ASSEMBLY - BSP VALVE KEY ASSEMBLY - NPT 17 Key Handle 18 Key Body 19 Pin #33RC #33NP #33LRC COVER ASSEMBLIES 1 Rubber Cover (RC- Yellow) 206952 -01 2 Locking Rubber Cover (NP -Red) (207250 -01) 2 Locking Rubber Cover (NP- Purple) 207250 -02 3 Locking Rubber Cover (LRC- Yellow) 207248 4 Metal Cover — 5 Cover Spring — 6 Cover Pin 205174 Locking Cover Key ( #2049) (Not Shown) D06401 — 200204 200208 200187 200187 200188 200209 (A) 200503 200210 (A) 200502 200211 (200191) (200212) (A) 200192 (A) 200213 (A) 200193 (A) 200214 (A) 200194 (A) 200215 (A) 200195 (A) 205806 B11801 (201635) (200206) 204146 B13401 812401 613301 200243 200243 (200224) (200242 -01) 200226 200226 203747 203748 #44RC #44NP #44LRC #55 206954 -01 206954-01 (207251 -01) 207251 -03 207249 -01 206252 206252 D06401 — 17 206954-01 #66 #77 206252 813901 200243 (200260) 200226 1 Catalog No.: 505 Date: 2/95 Page: 2 of 2 208412 (201252) 200594 200228 (200246) (200262) 200187 200187 200187 200230 200247 (200263) 201614 (200248) (200264) 200232 200249 200265 (200233) (200250) (200266) (A) 200234 (A) 200251(A) (200267) (A) 200235 (A) 200252 (A) 200268 (A) 200215 (A) 200215 (A) 200215 (A) 205806 (A) 200253 (A) 200253 (815101) 200243 (200274) 200275 203749 (203750) Note: Part numbers enclosed in brackets ( ) are not available individually, but may be sold in assemblies or kits. INSURE QUALITY - USE ONLY GENUINE RAIN BIRD PARTS 11 12 13 14 0 15 16 Quick Coupling Valves Quick Coupling Valve Family Whenever quick access into a pressurized line on a golf course or land- scape project is necessary, nothing is better suited than a quick coupling valve. Whether the application calls for a fast wash down, clean up, chemical mixing, or auxiliary watering, the choice of professionals is the quick cou- pling valve. And no one offers a more complete family of quick coupling valves than Rain Bird. Rugged, dependable, and long lasting, Rain Bird quick coupling valves are designed to meet the rigorous demands of golf course superintendents and grounds maintenance professionals alike. Constructed of heavy -duty brass and featuring corrosion - resistant, stainless steel, internal valve springs, these quick coupling valves are built to last, and each is backed by the proven reliability of a company with over fifty years of irrigation experience. Choose from metal or plastic, colored lids. Single or two -piece bodies. Locking or non - locking covers. Flow rates up to 125 gpm. And even special effluent water models. Quality. Reliability. And selection. Three good reasons why Rain Bird quick coupling valves are the choice of golf course superintendents and turf irrigation managers. • Heavy -duty Brass Construction. Available in economical one -piece design or easy to service two -piece design. • Internal Stainless Steel Valve Spring. Corrosion resistant for long life and reliable performance. • Choice of Covers. Durable, metal cover with stainless steel cover spring, or easy to locate red or yellow plastic covers. • Vandal Resistant Locking Covers. Maximum protection in high visibility locations. • "Do Not Drink" Safety Warning Label. Red cover is ideal for non - potable and effluent water applications. • Complete Line of Accessories. Valve Keys and Swivel Ell's to meet any irrigation need. RAINBIRoA A /NB /RD MASTER PARTS LIST FE•yifp •Y PROFESSIONA WO1 (OW/of MANUAL VALVE 1 -PIECE QUICK COUPLERS #3NP / #3RC / #3LCR #5NP/ #5RC / #5LRC / #7 Ref. Part Description C COPYRIGHT 1991 RAIN BIRD SPRINKLER MFG CORP VALVE ASSEMBLIES 7 Valve Cage 8 Spring 9 Gasket 10 Valve Body (NPT) 10 Valve Body (BSP) 11 Buna -N Disc 12 Disc Retainer 13 Asbestos Washer 14 Retaining Screw VALVE KEY ASSEMBLY - BSP VALVE KEY ASSEMBLY - NPT 15 Key Handle 16 Key Body 17 Pin (A) Included in Repair Kit — 2 #3RC #3NP #3LRC #5NP #5RC #5LRC 15 #7 COVER ASSEMBLIES 1 Yellow Rubber Cover (RC) 206952 -01 206954 -01 2 Locking Rubber Cover (NP - Red) (207250 -01) (207251 -02) 2 Locking Rubber Cover (NP - Purple) 207250 -02 207251 -04 3 Locking Rubber Cover (LRC - Yellow) 207248 207249 -02 — 4 Metal Cover — — 208412 5 Cover Spring — — (201252) 6 Cover Pin 205174 206252 200594 Locking Cover Key ( #2049) (Not Shown) D06401 D06401 — (A) 200503 201612 200288 (A) 200502 200232 200265 200504 200278 200287 (206596) (206601 -01) (200286) (206601 -02) — (A) 200192 (A) 200213 (A) 200251 (A) 200193 (A) 200214 (A) 200252 (A) 200194 (A) 200215 (A) 200215 (A) 200195 (A) 205806 (A) 200253 B13401 — B11201 813301 814501 (201635) 200243 200243 (200205) (200242 -01) (200291) 200226 200275 204146 203747 203749 Catalog No.: 505 Date: 2/95 Page: 1 of 2 17 7 8 10 Note: Part numbers enclosed in brackets ( ) are not available individually, but may be sold in assemblies or kits. INSURE QUALITY - USE ONLY GENUINE RAIN BIRD PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERIES les Valve Long Life and Easy Servicing Rain Bird's DV Series of valves –an open and shut case for Rain Bird innovation. The new DV flow control mode! features pressure– assisted throttling for fingertip control. And for adjustment at high pressure, it has a convenient screwdriver slot. Once the flow control is set, you still can manually activate the valve with a quarter turn of the solenoid. Every DV valve boasts a convenient one -piece solenoid and spray -free internal manual bleed, plus an innovative balanced – pressure design that increases diaphragm service life. The DV Valve from Rain Bird —a valve so advanced, it "s simple. RA/NB /RD PREFERRED BY PROFESSIONALS WORLDWIDE IA, Electric Remote - control Valves DV Series 3/ 1 (20/27, 26/34) Primary Application Economical, irrigation valve for residential and light commercial applications. Features • Double - filtered pilot -flow design for maximum reliability • Slip -by -slip configuration for low -cost, solvent -weld installation • 075 -OVX for low -flow Xengation'' applications down to 0.2 GPM (0,05 m'/h: 0,011 /s) when used with RBY - 075 -200MX filter upstream • 90 -mesh (200 micron) solenoid filter • Nylon- reinforced Buna -N diaphragm with self- cleaning. 90 -mesh (200 micron) control water filter • External bleed to manually flush system of dirt and debris during installation and system start-up • Captive diaphragm spring • Spray -tree internal bleed for manual operation keeps valve box dry • 1.25' (3.2 cm) stainless steel phillips head screws • Energy - efficient, low -power encapsulated solenoid with captured plunger and solenoid filter. DV Series Valve Operating Range • Flow: 075 -DV 3to22GPM (0.75 to 5,0 m'M. 0,21 to 1,39 1/s) Standard 0.2 to 22 GPM (0.05 to 5,0 m111: 0,01 to 1,39 Vs) with RBY- 075 -200MX WYE Filter • Flow: 100 -DV 3 to 40 GPM (0,75 to 10 n 0,21 to 2.78 Us) Standard 0.2 to 30 GPM (0.05 to 7,0 &m; 0,01 to 1,891/s) with RBY - 075 -200MX WYE Filter • Pressure: 15 to 150 psi (1 to 10 Bars) • Temperature: Up to 110 °F (43 °C) • Ambient air temperature -up to 125° F(52° C) Electrical Specifications 24 VAC 50/60 cycle solenoid power requirement -.30 A (7.2 VA) inrush current; .19 A (4.6 VA) holding current • Dimensions Height: 41/2711,4 cm) Length: 4V4 "(10,7 cm) Width: 3078,4 cm) • Models 075 -DV: 3 /4720/27) 100 -DV :: 1' (26/34)• 100- DV -SS: 1' (26/34) ' Available in BSP model. Electric Remote - control Valves DVF Series 1 .. (26/34) Primary Application Economical, irrigation valve for residential and light commercial applications. Features • incorporates all features of DV Series valves, plus: • Unique, easy -to -turn pressure- assisted flow control mechanism Operating Range • Flow: 100 -DVF 3 to 40 GPM (0.75 to 10 rrr'ih; 0,21 to 2,78 Us) Standard 0.2 to 30 GPM (0,051o7,0 milk 0,01 to 1,89 Vs) with RBY- 075 -200MX WYE Filter • Pressure: 1510 150 psi (1 to 10 Bars) • Temperature: Up to 110 °F(43 °C) • Ambient air temperature -up to 125° F (52° C) Electrical Specifications 24 VAC 50/60 cycle solenoid power requirement-.30 A (7.2 VA) inrush current; 19 A (4.6 VA) holding current • Dimensions Height: 51/2714,2 cm) Length: 41/2710,7 cm) Width. 31/2"(8,4 cm) • Models 100 -DVF: 1' (26/34)' 'Available rn BSP model 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 External Bleed Screw 90 Mesh Diaphragm Filter Heavy Duty Plastic Body o eno, Internal Downstream -. Bleed Solenoid Filter Pilot Flow Path Nylon- Reinforced Buna -N Diaphragm Threaded or Slip Configurations DV and DVF How to Specify: 100 -DV F Size TOptional Feature Model This specifies a 100 -DVF valve; 1726/34) female threads; with flow control. Note. For non - U.S.applications it is necessary to specify NPT or BSP thread type (1" only). oRegistered Trademark of Rain Bird Sprinkler Mfg. Corp. 0 1993 Ram Bird Sprinkler Mfg. Corp. 10/93 DV Series Valve DV and DVF Valve Pressure Loss (psi) Valve Pressure Loss (Bars) Metric Flow 075 -DV 100 -DV /100 -DVF /100 -DV -SS Flow 075 -DV 100-0V /100 -OVF /100 -DV -SS GPM 3/4' 1' 3/4" 1" psi psi no vs Bars Bars 3 2.5 0.5 0,75 0,21 0,18 0,03 5 2.9 1.0 1,0 0,28 0,20 0,06 10 3.8 2.6 2,0 0,56 0,24 19,16 20 5.1 3.6 5,0 1,39 0,37 0,29 30 — 6.5 7,5 2,08 — • 0,50 40 — 9.0 10,0 2,78 0;67 NOTE: See Xerigation manual for WYE Filter flow loss data. 1) Rain Bird recommends flow rates in the supply line not to exceed 5.5 ftJsec. (1,7 m /s) in order to reduce the effects of water hammer. 2) DV Series valves cannot be used with PRS pressure regulating modules. RA/NtB /RD PREF ERRE D BY PR OFESS/OM AU WORCOwwE Rain Bird. Conserving more than water. Printed on Recycled Paper. Ram Bird Sales. Inc. Contractor Division, 145 North Grand Avenue, Glendora. CA 91741 038511A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /P.4IN MASTER IReFIYN(D IY P O FESLO S. zJ WORtDW7OE ® PARTS LIST ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE 75 DV/ 100 DV /100DV -F 1 Ref. Part Description O COPYRIGHT 1991 RAIN IIIRD SPRIN'KLCR � IFG CORP 75 -DV INSURE QUALITY - USE ONLY GENUINE RAN BIRD PARTS f Catalog No.: 602 Date: 2/95 Page: 1 of 1 Note: Part Numbers enclosed in brackets ( ) are noat available individually, but may be sold in assemblies or kits. 10 11 12 100 -DV 100 -DV -F 1 Solenoid Repair Kit 208588 -01 208588 -01 208588 -01 2 Solenoid 0-Ring AS 021, 70A 209502 209502 209502 3 Solenoid Filter (210073) (210073) (210073) 4 Bonnet Repair Kit (Flow Control Version) — — 209398 5 Flow Control Handle — — 208393 6 Bonnet Assembly — — (170170) 7 External Bleed Screw — — 210331 8 Bonnet (208288) (208288) — Diaphragm Repair Kit 210746 -03 210746 -03 210746 -03 9 Bonnet Screws (6 required, 6 in repair kit.) (210295) (210295) (210295) 10 Diaphragm Spring (206944) (206944) (206944) 11 Diaphragm Assembly w /Filter (170353) (170353) _ (170353) 3 Solenoid Filter (210073) (210073) (210073) 12 Body NPT (208465 -03) (208771 -01 12 Body BSP — (208771-01) (208771 -01) (208771 -02) (208771 -02) 12 Body Slip x Slip — (208771 -03) (208771 -03) Model Sae Gic'b a 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 Century Series 1 i G S A 4.20 3.10 2.10 4.80 1 0. 9 0 / / P 1 1/' G/ jf 1.60 1.30 2.30 1.60 3.60 2.80 520 4.00 7.00 5.50 9.20 7.10 11.70 9.00 1440 11.00 17.50 13.30 E / � / ..A . ' , % 4 330 j % %%% 4 30 5.50 % 6.90 j 4 1 8.50 2 . G GA V / //,✓/ /� 2.10 � �" 2.70 3.30 1.60 2.00 4.00 240 4 2.80 5.60 3.30 6.50 3.90 750 4.40 1.90 /. 2 40 3, l A%� % % //l � / / i % % � / /i /� / % 171 %/ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 V Globe /Angle ► Commercial A A P P L IC A T I O N Field proven in thousands of installa- tions, the Century Series, with its multitude of options, has established a track record of reliable performance under the most challenging conditions. SIZES: • 1", 1 1/2 ", 2" and 3" plastic models FEATURES Performance • Flow range from 5 -300 GPM • Pressure range from 10 -150 psi • External or internal manual bleed • Brass flow control stem (2" and 3" models) • Flow control allows precise flow adjustment and manual shutoff Pressure Regulation Option (103 models) • Electric operation • Self- modulating pressure regulator maintains constant downstream pressure within ± 2 psi of pressure setting • Outlet pressure regulating range from 20 -100 psi with 0 -100 psi L Schrader valve (less gauge) option • Inlet pressure must be 15 psi greater than desired outlet pressure Anti - Contamination (102 models) • Electric valves with 150 -mesh external control -water filter and 3 -way solenoid • Non - continuous metering system for dirty or effluent water applications • Small exchange of control water allows minimum filter capacity • Control -water filter allows easy external service • Selectable normally open or normally closed mode • Working pressure range from 10 -100 psi Hydraulic Actuation (200 models) • Normally open, hydraulic operation for use with hydraulic controllers • Brass compression fittings accept 1/4" O.D. tubing Quality Construction • Glass- reinforced, nylon body with stands high temperatures • Nylon- reinforced Buna -N diaphragm • Encapsulated solenoid • Molded brass studs allow positive bonnet attachment FLOW RATE-GPM u 1) When designing a system, the industry standard for flow ra e velocity through pipes and fittings is 5 FPS 2) Pressure loss data is derived from valves independently tested by CIT, Fresno, CA See back page for Models/How To Order. FAX FACTS E • Easily serviced without removal from the system ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS • Solenoid: 24 VAC • Inrush volt -amp: 24 VAC -11.50 VA • Inrush current: .4 amp (102 models: .48 amp) • Holding volt -amp: 24 VAC -5.75 VA • Holding current: .2 amp (102 models: .24 amp) OPTIONAL ACCESSORIES • Weatherproof gauge and regulator spring (SPK -100) Hardie Irrigation A James Hardie Company 27631 La Paz Road, Laguna Niguel, CA 92656 (800) 634 -TURF Fax (714) 831 -3212 : Hardie CENTURY SERIES V A L V E S Globe /Angle MODELS /HOW TO ORDER 100 - 1 T Globe/Angle Model Size • 102 -1 1" • 102 -1.5 1 1/2" • 102 -2 2" • 102 -3 3" Anti - contamination, Electric Globe/Angle Model 102 --r Size 103 -1 -30 - T Pressure Regulating, Electric Globe/Angle 1 psi Regulator Model Size Option • 103 -1 -30 1" 30 psi • 103- 1.5 -30 11/2" 30 psi • 103 -2 -30 2" 30 psi • 103 -3 -30 3" 30 psi • 103 -1 -100 1" 100 psi • 103 -1.5 -100 11/2" 100 psi • 103 -2 -100 2" 100 psi • 103 -3 -100 3" 100 psi • 102 -1 1" • 102 -1.5 1 1/2" - r • 102-2 2 " Hydraulically Operated, • 102 -3 3" Globe/Angle Size • 200 -1 1" • 200 -1.5 - 1 1/2" • 200 -2 2" • 200 -3 3" Hardie Irrigation A James Hardie Company 27631 La Paz Road, Laguna Niguel, CA 92656 (800) 634 -TURF Fax: (714) 831 -3212 01993 Hardie Irrigation 10/93 TL 1009 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 35 X0 11 18 18 15 55 59 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 100 -1 REF NO DESCRIPTION PART NO LIST 100 -1.5 PART NO LIST PART NO UST 8811. 24VACG 9.20 • 9 00 R 2006: '26.. 1 24VAC SOLENOID ASSY 60HZ R811.24VACG 9.20 8811. 24VACG �` 2001 2 BONNETT ASSEMBLY (R.W.) R- 2001 -13 11.00 R- 2001 -13 11.00 R- 2006 -7 26.50 8- 2006 -7 26.50 ,.•, ; 55Mi 552`' 9 -}` -i 11: 9 1552 :149 STEM ASSEMBLY R2862 -1 3.75 R2862 -1 9.20 .11 R688701 .11 R688701 .11 . -.. ._ . U ASSEMBLY' ` R6 6902 606902 0 R606902 1.10 1.10 8 606902 :10 % R ` 7 0 - RING' R1631 .18 R1631 .18 R1631 .18 R1631 .18 . R1054 .18 R1054 X18 81054 18 . 81054 : '.18 10 DIAPHRAGM ASSEMBLY R -1308 6.50 R -1310 7.90 R-1312 37.35 R -1314 38.15 11 z:r. - » - w =«-- A T- _ _ _ 81058 44 _, 81059 64 t$EAT SEAL �: «r _ N/A 12 REPAIR KIT SPK-100-1 17.20 SPK- 100 -1.5 17.20 SPK -100 -2 50.90 SPK -100 -3 60.60 -� DJCLl1OED IN KTT ' ... N/A - N/A =_ N/A N/A f - - 5 0 - RING' R688701 .11 R688701 ' List price per individual unit. 100 -2 Brand: Hardie'" Series: Century Model Numbers 100 -1 100 -1.5 100 -2 100 -3 100 -3 PART NO UST R811- 24VACG 9.20 I 26.20 3.75 N/A - N/A - R1032 13.00 8- 1032 ::13.00 910 COVER (HOPE) WT. 11/2 Lb. PART 910.2 HDPE (Non Bolt), PART 910 -20 HOPE (Lock Bolt) 910 BODY (HDPE) WT. 3 Lb. PART 910 -1 MARKING REV. 2/1/81 PAT NO. 40650."0 10" CIA. 31" x 1' /" KNOCK CUT (octionai) 11 =_ CIA. 1.2 CIA. 3i3" x 1 3i4" LOCK BOLT (ccticnal) COVER LIFT 10 /a CARSON INDUSTRIES INC. 1925 "A" Street. '_a '/erne. Califcrni,.. • 2'31 222 -32"5 • (714) 5 96 -1988 SrEFIEES MODEL 910 -12 (NON BOLT) MC DEL 910 -129 (LOCK BOLT) Gr?E =_N OR GREY BLACK ON SPECIAL ORDER Small Hax Series General Detail Made 1419 -1 1419 Polymer Ccnmete Cover Weight: Polymer Concrete 21 lbs. Part No: 1419-3R 1419 Hinged Cover Weight: HDPE 3 lbs. Part No: 1419 -2 Non Bolt Part No: 1419 -2B Bolt Down 1419 Meter Reeding Cover Weight: HDPE 3 lbs. Part No: 1419 -5 Non Bolt 1419 -5B Bolt Down Weight: Cast Iron Reader 4.5 lbs. Part No: 1419 -6 Non Bolt 1419 -6B Bolt Down 1419 Non Hinged Cover Weight HDPE 3 lbs. Part No: 1419 -3 Non Bolt 1419 -3B Bolt Down 1419 T -Coves Weight: HDPE 3 lbs. Part No: 1419 -4 Non Bolt 1419 -4B Bolt Down 1419 Box Weight: HDPE 71bs. Part No: 1419 -12 Colors Available: Green or Grey Black, Tan or Violet (Reclaimed Water) on Special Order 1'/." CARSON- BROOKS !PLASTICS.INC. Glendon. California Toll -Frye: MO) 735 -556 -4 Phone: Flora Mississippi Tull -Free. (8001 255-6340 Phone (601) 879 -3335 Fax: (601) 879 -8083 (909) 592 -6272 Fax: (909) 592 -7971 1 , /4 " FLEX LOCK l.1FT SLOT / 10' /s" 15 1 MARKING 15'i" �i,• x 2 BOLT (Optional) " NOTE: For use in non - vehicular traffic installations only. We do NOT recommend installation in concrete or asphalt. Weights and dimensions may vary slightly. Revision Date 1 /1/94 CARSON- BROOKS PLASTICS, LTD. Roscommon. Ireland none: 01 35 39 03 -25922 Fax: U 1 35 39 03 -2592! Small Box Series General Detail. Made 1220 Polymer Concrete Cover Weight: Polymer Concrete 26 lbs. Part No: 1220 -3R 1220 Non Hinged Cover Weight: HDPE 4 lbs. Part No: 1220 -3 Non Bolt 1220 -3B Bolt Down 1220 Meter Reading Cover Weight: HDPE 4 lbs. Part No: 1220 -5 Non Bolt 1220 -5B Bolt Down Weight: Cast Iron Reader 5 lbs. Part No: 1220 -6 Non Bolt 1220 -6B Bolt Down 1220 T -Cover Weight: HDPE 4 lbs. Part No: 1220 -4 Non Bolt 1220 -4B Bolt Down 1220 Box Weight: HDPE 9.4 lbs. Part No: 1220 -12 CARSON - BROOKS 18'••4 PLASTICS. INC. Glendora. California Toll -Free: (800) 735 -5564 Phone: (909) 592 -6272 Fax: (90'x) 592 -7971 Flora Mississippi Toll-Free: (800) 255 -6340 Phone: (601) 379 -3335 Fax: (601) 879.3083 Colors Available: Green or Grey Black or Tan on Special Order • NOTE: For use in non - vehicular traffic installations only. We do NOT recommend installation in concrete or asphalt. Weights and dimensions may vary slightly. Revision Date 1/1/94 ( CARSON- BROOKS PLASTICS, LTD. Roscommon, Ireland Phone: 01 35 39 03 -25922 Fax: 01 35 39 03 -25921 tCc - E:ICI FORD BALL VALVES are idea! for use in wale. service lines Tightness M BOTH directlors at a.l pressures, easy turning, nonbinding, and minimum pressure loss —these character silos are adced to good engineering design, quality. and precise manufacturing. Solid one piece lee-head and stern Sturdy diecks allow 90' motion 3n, are enclosed and protected. Heavy cast bronze" oody .s engineered to withstand pipe Stresses. Ford B31 Valves are designed to withstand working pressures up to 200 PSI. Variety of and connections avaiiaote — for copper, iron, Mastic. or direct to meter. Ends are integral or secured with edrleive to prevent tnintanticrtal dsassembfy. TO'c _E_C c :cCST r- Information Features of the Ford Ball Valve A bronze or plastic ring teas the stem sadly into the body 91 the valve. Buna -N 0-rings in the stem assure permanent watertig 'it seal at tcp. Molded Buna -N rubber seats support the ball. Valve i3 water tight and is a non - directional valve. Spherical fluorocarbon- coated brass ball provides maximum flow Caoac ty and eats* Of turning. All Ford Meter Box brass conforms to AWWA Standard C8004 (ASTM B -82 — Index 115 — 854+ -5). Options Available COUPLINGS FOR ALL TYPES OF CONNECTIONS Ford Curb Stops and Mater Valves are availab:e with a wide variety ct connectons. Make your selection from compression. flare, female or male style fittings for Copper, Iron, Polyethylene. Polybutylene. PVC and Lead. Drip Joint instead of Pack Joint for CTS (for all sizes) or PEP (3/4' or 1') can be ordered by adding - -G" to the end of Catalog Number. EXAMPLE: 941.333-G. 360' TEE HEAD ROTATION Standard Tee Head Slops in body permit 83" tu'nvniy. FUJI 380° tee head retool is avalable. Add "R' to Catalog Number. Example: 821.333R. VALVE LOCk CAPS Lock Caps are available for 8/8' thru 2 3a11 Valves and 314° Angle Key Valves. See oage 37 to order. HANDLES FOR VALVES Handles for Valves are available. Crdenng information aro cescr ptions ate tounc or pages 38 arc 37. 2" GATE VALVE OPERATING NUT Adapts Tao Heao on 1- 1/4',1.1/2' and 2' Ball 'waives (gated en pages 4 - 1 10)'er ooeratior, with standard gate valve wrenches. See page 37 to order. RECLAIMED WATER BALL VALVE TEE HEAD A cisttnctive tee nead with 'Reclaimed Water• Ietterng for easy_ , detm'tcation is availed" on 314' th:u 2' Ball Valves. Insert 'SW' into the Catalog Number. Example: 8$,}Q(1 1.333W. PADLOCK WINGS Most Valves are evailabe with Padlock Wings ;except for vlirneaeolra Ja :ve or where noted). Add "Al" to Catalog Number. -W. in the Catalog Number !rdicates valve Is a »allabfa with dadlocx wings only_ MINNEAPOLIS PATTERN VALVE Threads are ava cable around he valve boot: in roar to each Mirneara ;s stria curb box, 3/4' and :' valves have 1-1/2' threads; 1.1/4', 1.1(2' and 2' valves havo 2' threads. It an adcirona! a'ze 1s requre0 othe• than he sizes ;istea. 3lease contact lie 'actoy 'or availability. "NEW ENGLAND" IRON PIPE THREADS 'New England' Iron pipe threads under flare copper toe r,�t are svadabfe. Iris option :an be fOurd on page 34 . "OPEN RIGHT" FEATURE Valves with the "open rig-n' 'eature are manula_tu•er. sc the salve coatis by turning the handle to the FIGHT o: clockwise. ;NOTE: Standard For valves are typically 'ranufacrured so the valve coafis ;, turnlrg t..e valve nanc.e :a the !eft o' .ouster c:ockwise.) Tnis option can be fount on page 35. Sz:TT !EET- TT-Ck 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T EC H -T • S P E C s Professional Series Industry's Leading Spray Heads 1800 Series Spray Heads have first -rate quality built in for reliable operation and long life. Their superior components and features make them the spray heads of choice for a wide variety of applications. 1800 Series Features • Exclusive co- molded, pressure - activated wiper seal prevents excessive flow -by and water waste. Keeps debris from entering upon retraction. • Stainless steel spring for reliable retraction. Strongest spring in the industry. • Ratchet mechanism on all models allows easy adjustment without tools while sprinklers are operating. • Pre - installed 1800 Pop -TopTM flush plug allows for easy nozzle installation. Blocks debris from entering after flushing. • Matched precipitation rates across nozzle sets and patterns allow distances and patterns to be mixed without precipitation rates fluctuating. • Plastic and stainless steel materials resist corrosion. • internal parts removed from the top of the sprinkler for easy servicing. • Side and bottom inlets featured on 1806 and 1812 only • Extended 5 -year trade warranty. Operating Range • Precipitation Rate: .78 to 5.15 inches per hour (20 to 130 mm/h) • Spacing: 3 to 20 feet (1,2 to 6,7 m) • Pressure: 15 to 70 psi (1 to 4,8 Bars) Specifications • Flow -by: 0 at 8 psi (0,5 Bars) or greater; .05 GPM (0,01 m' /h; 0.003 t /s) otherwise Dimensions • '/2" (15/21) female threaded inlets • Body height: 1802 -4" (10 cm), 1803 -4'/8" (12 cm), 1804 -6" (15 cm), 1806 -9 (24 cm), 1812 -16" (40 cm) • Exposed diameter: 2'/<" (5,7 cm) Models • 1802: 2" (5 cm) • 1806: 6" (15 cm) • 1803:3" (8 cm) • 1812: 12" (30 cm) • 1804: 4" (10 cm) 1 800 Series Spray Heads How to Specify 1804 SAM -PRS (—'r- MODEL OPTIONAL FEATURE This specifies an 1800 Series sprayhead with 4"(10 cm) pop -up height' Seal- A•Mahc `.' check valve: in -stem pressure regulation. RAINBIRD 1800 Series Spray Heads 1800 SAM Series Ideal for use in areas with changing elevations, the 1800 SAM Series offers all 1800 Series features plus: • Built -in Seat- A- Matic`" (SAM) check valve. Eliminates the need for under -the -head check valves. No parts to be installed at the site. • Traps water in lateral pipes in elevation changes up to 8'. Reduces wear on system components by minimizing water hammer during start -up. • Prevents leakage from spray heads at lower elevations. Stops water waste. Ends landscape damage due to flooding and/or erosion. • Even stronger retract spring to accommodate elevation changes up t0 8'. Best spring in the industry. • Designed for use with all Rain Bird plastic and brass spray head nozzles. • SAM stamped on cap for easy identification and maintenance. Operating Range • Precipitation Rate: .78 to 5.15 inches per hour (20 to 130 mm /h) • Spacing: 3 to 20 feet (1,5 to 7,3 m) • Pressure: 25 to 70 psi (1,7 to 4,8 Bars) Specifications • SAM capability: holds up to 8 feet (2,4 m) of head; 3.5 psi (0,2 Bars) • Flow -by: 0 at 8 psi (0,5 Bars) or greater; .05 GPM (0,01 &/h; 0,003 I/s) otherwise • SAM operable only when installed by bottom inlet Dimensions • '/2" (15/21) female threaded inlets • Body height 1804 SAM -6" (15 cm), 1806 SAM -9' /8" (24 cm), 1812 SAM -16" (40 cm) • Exposed diameter: 27." (5,7 cm) Models • 1804 SAM: 4" (10 cm) • 1806 SAM: 6" (15 cm) • 1812 SAM: 12" (30 cm) ■ ■ ■ 1800 PRS Series Designed for areas with high and/or widely fluctuating water pressures, the 1800 PRS Series has all 1800 Series features plus: PATENTED PRS pressure regulator built into the stem. No parts to be installed at the site. Maintains constant outlet pressure at 30 psi (2 Bars). Spray heads and nozzles perform best at 30 psi. Ensures maximum spray head and nozzle performance regardless of varying inlet pressures. Maintains constant pressure regardless of nozzle used. Restricts water loss by up to 70% if nozzle is removed or damaged. Saves water and money Reduces possibility of accidents and property damage. Recommended for vandal -prone areas. Ends misting and fogging caused by high pressure. Stops water waste. Ensures necessary watering occurs in high pressure or wind conditions. Designed for use with all Rain Bird plastic and brass spray head nozzles. PRS stamped on cap for easy identification and maintenance. Operating Range • Precipitation Rate: .78 to 5.15 inches per hour (20 to 130 mm /h) • Spacing: 3 to 20 feet (1,5 to 7,3 m) • Flow: 0.2 to 4 GPM (0,05 to 0,91 m /h; 0,013 to 0,25 1/s) • Pressure: 15 to 70 psi (1 to 5 Bars) • Regulates nozzle pressure to an average 30 psi (2 Bars) with inlet pressures of up to 70 psi (5 Bars). • Flow -by: 0 at 8 psi (0,6 Bars) or greater; .05 GPM (0,01 m' /h; 0,0031 /s) otherwise • Installation: side or bottom inlet • Side inlet installation not recommended in freezing climates Dimensions • 1/2" (15/21) female threaded inlets • Body height: 1804 PRS 6" (15 cm), 1806 PRS -9' /e" (24 cm), 1812 PRS -16" (40 cm) • Exposed diameter: 2'/." (5,7 cm) Models 1804 PRS: 4" (10 cm) 1806 PRS: 6" (15 cm) 1812 PRS: 12" (30 cm) 1800 SAM -PRS Series Meets the needs of all spray areas, regardless of changing elevation or water pressures. incorporates all 1800 Series SAM and PRS features. "SAM- PRS "stamped on the cap for easy identification and maintenance. Operating Range • Precipitation Rate: .78 to 5.15 inches per hour (20 to 130 mm /h) • Spacing: 5 to 24 feet (1,5 to 7,3 m) • Pressure: 25 to 70 psi (1,7 to 5 Bars) Specifications • SAM capability: holds up to 8 feet (2,4 m) of head; 3.5 psi(0,2 Bars) • Flow -by: 0 at 8 psi (0,6 Bars) or greater; .05 GPM (0,01 m /h; 0.003 Us) otherwise • SAM operable only when installed by bottom inlet Dimensions • 1/2" (15/21) female threaded inlets • Body height: 1804 SAM- PAS -6" (15 cm), 1806 SAM -PRS -9 (24 cm), 1812 SAM - PRS -16" (40 cm) • Exposed diameter 2 '/5" (5,6 cm) Models • 1804 SAM -PRS: 4" (10 cm) • 1806 SAM -PRS: 6" (15 cm) • 1812 SAM -PRS: 12" (30 cm) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Exclusive Rain Bird co- molded, pressure activated wiper seal Strongest retract spring in the industry Side inlet on 6" and 12" models PRS in -stem pressure regulator Ratchet (for easy nozzle alignment) SAM (Seal- A- Maticw) in -stem check valve 1800 Series Spray Heads 1806 with Swing Joint on Bottom Inlet 1812 with Swing Pipe on Side Inlet • R4INBIRD Ito Specifications 1802, 1803, 1804, 1806 and 1812 Pop -up Full or Part Circle Spray Sprinkler The full or part circle pop -up sprinkler shall be capable of covering feet radius (FT. RAD) at pounds per square inch (psi) with a discharge rate of gallons per minute (GPM). The overall pop -up height shall be inches. The sprinkler body, stem, nozzle and screen shall be constructed of heave -duty, ultra- violet resistant plastic. It shall have a heavy -duty stain- less steel retract spring for positive pop -down and a ratcheting system for easy alignment of the pattern. The sprinkler shall have a soft etas - tomer pressure- activated co- molded wiper seal for cleaning debris from the pop -up stem as it retracts into the case to prevent the sprinkler from sticking up to minimize "flow -by." The sprinkler shall have a matched precipitation rate (MPR) plastic or brass nozzle with an adjusting screw capable of regulating the radius and flow. The sprinkler shall be capable of housing under the nozzle; protective, non- clogging filter screens or pressure compensating screens (PCS). The screen shall be used in conjunction with the adjusting screw for regulating. The 6" (15cm) and 12" (30cm) models shall have both a side and a bottom 1/2" (15/21) (FNPT) inlet for ease of installation. The sprinkler shall have a Pop -Top TM Flush Plug preinstalled. The plug shall prevent debris from clogging the sprinkler during installation and allow for system to be flushed before nozzling. The plug shall be bright orange in color and constructed of polypropylene material. 1804 SAM, 1806 SAM and 1812 SAM Full or Part Circle Seal- A- Matic`M Pop -up Spray Sprinkler Optional Feature Specifications: When so indicated on the design, the 4", 6" or 12" high pop -up spray sprinklers shall also include a Seal- A- Matic (SAM) check valve to pre- vent low -head drainage of up to 8 feet of head. This feature shall require the use of the bottom inlet only. These units shall be identifiable from the top with "SAM" markings on the cap. The sealing device shall be an inte- gral part of the pop -up stem, removable through the top of the sprinkler, and shall seal against the bottom case inlet. It shall create no more than 1 psi pressure drop at the maximum rated flow. Recycled Paper Rain Bird. Conserving More Than Water ® Registered Trademark of Rain Bird Sprinkler Mfg. Corp. 01996 Rain Bird Sprinkler Mfg. Corp. 4/96 1800 Series Spray Heads 1800, 1800 SAM, 1800 PRS, 1800 SAM -PRS 1804 PRS, 1806 PRS and 1812 PRS Full or Part Circle Pressure Regulating Pop -up Spray Sprinkler Optional Feature Specifications: When so indicated on the design, the 4", 6" or 12" high pop -up spray sprinkler shall also include a pressure regulating (PRS) device to prevent high pressure fogging to the nozzle stream. This regulating device shall be an integral part of the pop -up stem, removable through the top of the case. These units shall be identifiable from the top with "PRS" markings on the cap. The device shall regulate the nozzle pressure to 30 psi for inlet pres- sures from 35 to 70 psi. Below 35 psi the pressure loss shall not exceed 6 psi. 1804 SAM -PRS, 1806 SAM -PRS and 1812 SAM -PRS Seal- A- Maticr Pressure Regulating Pop -up Spray Sprinkler Optional Feature Specifications: When so indicated on the design, the 4 ", 6" or 12" high pop -up spray sprinklers shall also include a Seal- A- Matic` (SAM) check valve and a pressure regulating (PRS) device. These units shall be identifiable from the top with "SAM -PRS" markings on the cap. The check valve shall prevent low -head drainage of up to 8 feet of head. The pressure regulating device shall prevent high pressure fogging of the nozzle stream by regulating the nozzle pressure to 30 psi for inlet pressures from 35 to 70 psi. Below 35 psi, the pressure loss shall not exceed 6 psi. These models shall utilize the bottom inlet only. The sprinkler shall be as manufactured by Rain Bird Sprinkler Mfg. Corp., Glendora, California. RAINkBIRD, Rain Bird Sales, Inc. 4261 South Country Club Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Phone: 520 - 741 -6100 Fax: 520- 741 -6146 Rain Bird Sales. inc. 970 West Sierra Madre Avenue, Azusa, CA 91702 Phone: 818 -812 -3400 Fax: 818-812-3411 Ram Bird international, Inc. 145 North Grand Avenue. Glendora, CA 91740 Phone: 818-852-7100 Fax: 818 - 963 -4287 0390258 SMALL TURF AND L ANDSCAPE SPRINKLERS 570Z Series Featuring a low- pressure seal that flushes only upon retraction, 570Z models are ideal for small turf areas and intricate designs. Six distinct pop -up sprinkler bodies and a host . of interchangeable nozzles. provide . unlimited design flexibility. 5 - OZ rr/r- S1- c.0.l1 :tIPR Plus arrzzfe • Ratcheting riser lets tintJltte- lttnea ler • installation - - -Seal Pubshes on retraction 2" cap diameter Side inlet at'atlable or; Wand 12 lnalc'ls Optional.' Cbec'k- U- .tfatic seal • installed brio riser, preterits Iran lead drainage Toro 570Z Series Sprinklers 0' -16' Radius Features • Seal prevents flushing on pop -up — enables more heads to be placed on same zone • Low- pressure sealing at 15 PSI • Retraction flushing clears debris for reliable pop -down • Accepts all Toro spray nozzles — including 570 MPR Plus nozzles and filter screens • Check -O -Matic models available — eliminating low -head drainage • Ratchering riser feature for easy are adjustment • Side -inlet models available on both 6" and 12" sprinkler bodies for easier installation • Pop -up design • Durable engineering plastic construction • Stainless -steel retraction spring • Screw -on cap (retrofits all previous Toro 570 bodies) Specifications • Recommended operating pressure: 20-50 PSI • Maximum operating pressure: 75 PSI • Flow rate: 0.05 -4.58 GPM • %z" female- threaded inlet • Dimensions: Body diameter: • 1 %" on 2 ", 3 ", 4" and 6" bodies • 114" on 12" body Cap diameter: 2" • Side inlet — 4'P" from top of sprinkler to center of side inlet • Effluent cover available (Part No. 89 -3903) Specifying Information Pop( h 11t I,f (5702 xP Optional Optional iI —side inlet: for (i (Optional) And 12' Heights Icomi COdt– Clerk -O- static For Example: \Shen , p tt ilving a i - UZ Series Sprinkler with r pop-up height of 6" and a check valve. you would specify: 570Z-6P OOM ; - n /, yxmkk•r 1 "uh' with an MPH Plus nw11r. math such• •tvitiaat"m Ipg IM awl' Ike atone I""lc specilicn■ m Toro 570 Check -O -Matic Check Valve Eliminates low head drainage — reducing water waste and erosion. Features • Available pre - installed in all 570Z Series sprinklers • Easily retrofits any 570 sprinkler with ratcheting riser (requires Check- Nlatic spring) Specifications • Pressure required to pop -up and seal the riser with Check- O -Matic installed in the head: • 2P. 3P. 4P: 20 PSI . • 6P, 12P: 25 PSI' • Check- O -Matic maintains 7' elevation change • The Check -O -Marie feature requires use of the bottom inlet. Toro 570 Series Pressure Compensating Devices (PCDs) These PCDs ensure consistent. efficient performance without water waste in systems subject to varying pressures. Features • Provides true matched precipitation rites with all 570 MPR Plus nozzles • Eliminates nozzle fogging • Compensates for pressure variations within a system • Retrofits any 570 nozzle to pressure compensating feature • Maintains constant 30 PSI performance at pressures exceeding 30 PS1 Specifications • Operating pressure: 30 -75 PSI • Flow rate: 0.09-4 GPM White Blue 15' Series 8' Series 12' Series i'x30' SST 10' Series i'X I8' SST -4(30' CST Stream Buhhlcr, Flat - Spray 1Non -\IPRt •1'x30' EST 9's18' SST 570 Nozzle Screens' Toro 570 Shrub Adapter 12P SI 6P SI 6P 4P 3P Mount this adapter on a %" NPT riser with any 570 MPR Plus nozzle and effectively irrigate small shrubs and planters without water waste. Features • Accepts all Toro 570 MPR Plus Spray, Stream Bubbler and Flood Bubbler nozzles • Effluent cover available (Part No. 89 -5818) Specifications • %" female - threaded inlet Blue and Metal 5 Sees 3'.x6' SST 10 Stream Spry' Series 3i Stream Spray Series Flood Bubbler Series F1at•Sprac. Low Gallonage t \on -\Il'R • Inda, .u,. vravn lrr u A !Jed unli nt vile xrh•r to urnnt I'ans fln•ak.K" to "k It n"rn• mtonn.""m 2P Toro 570 Accessories 570 -6X • Male -inlet threads fit into all Toro 570 Series risers to provide a 6" extension • 5 7 0 female -outlet threads accept all Toro nozzles • Maximum pressure: 75 PSI 570SR -6 • "1" male - threaded inlet • 570 female -outlet threads accept all Toro nozzles • Height: 6" • Maximum pressure: 75 PSI 570SR -18 • t5" male - threaded inlet • 570 female - outlet threads accept all Toro nozzles • Height: 18" • Maximum pressure: 75 P5I 850-67 Stabilizer • Fits all 570Z 2P. 3P, 4P and 6P bodies Models PGS - Shru PGP -4" P PGH - 12" Pop-up hen we introduced the original PGP in 1981, it took the market by storm. It was Hunter Industries' first gear - driven sprinkler — backed by 25 years of invention and innovation. Our continuous improvements have kept PGP the sprinkler of choice for residential and light commercial irrigation. Professionals agree: no rotary sprinkler is more reliable, durable or versatile. And we believe no sprinkler in Integral rubber cover Complete set of interchange- able nozzles, free 40° -360° adjustable arc or full - circle versions Proven, long -life gear drive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Large dirty water screen Operating Specifications • Discharge rate: .5 to 14.4 gpm • Radius: 22' to 52' • Pressure range: 30 to 70 psi • Matched precipitation: .4" per hour at 50 psi for spacings from 25' to 45' • Optional factory- installed drain check valve for up to 10' elevation change • Nozzle trajectory: standard - 25 °, low -angle - 13° • 3 /4" female inlet • Exposed diameter: 1 3 /4" 1 1 1 1 1 Features & Benefits of the PGP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 v 1 1 r�ler 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 its class is more cost - effective. Its body is built to take it. Its super - efficient nozzles produce honest, even water distribution for beautifully healthy results. Its long lasting gear drive is time- tested and proven as one of the industry's best. And PGP is capped with a new rubber cover that keeps harmful dirt out of the adjustment mechanism. It's been imitated, yet never equaled. It stands ready to help create more of the world's finest outdoor environments. Kis dirt out, won't fall off 12 standard or 7 low -angle nozzles I for virtually any task For fastest, hassle -free adjustment, wet or dry First introduced over 10 years ago and still continuously improved Puts an end to nozzle clogging Rising to new heights Here's the best of both worlds for large shrub and flower beds: The powerful performance of a rotor plus enough height to clear lower foreground plantings with uninterrupted spray. It's the PGH — a 12 -inch pop - up version of the PGP. And because it fully retracts to ground level, it's ideal for both high - traffic and high- visibility areas. How to save more water Add the optional drain check valve to any PGP sprinkler. It prevents water from draining out of the irrigation pipes when the sprinkler pops down. Checking up to 10 feet in elevation change, it saves water, reduces liability exposure and stops erosion near the sprinkler. PGP Best - Selling Rotor for Residential and Light Commercial Irrigation STANDARD N Nozzle PSI 30 1 40 50 60 30 2 40 50 60 30 3 40 50 60 30 4 40 50 60 30 5 40 50 60 30 6 40 50 60 30 7 40 50 60 30 8 40 50 60 30 9 40 50 60 40 1 0 50 60 70 40 11 50 60 70 40 12 60 70 Radius ft. GPM 28' .5 29' .6 29' .7 30' .8 29' .7 30' .8 30' .9 31' 1.0 30' .9 31' 1.0 31' 1.2 32' 1.3 32' 1.2 33' 1.4 34' 1.6 34' 1.8 34' 1.6 36' 1.8 38' 2.0 38' 2.2 36' 2.0 38' 2.4 40' 2.7 40' 2.9 36' 2.6 40' 3.0 42' 3.4 42' 3.7 37' 3.2 40' 3.7 43' 4.2 44' 4.6 38' 4.2 43' 4.9 46' 5.5 47' 6.0 45' 6.0 48' 6.8 49' 7.6 51' 8.2 46' 8.0 48' 8.9 50' 9.8 51' 10.5 46' 11.4 48' 12.2 50' 13.2 52' 14.4 Data represent test results in zero wind. Adjust for local conditions. Radius can be reduced by up to 30% with nozzle retaining screw. (This may alter the uniformity of the spray pattern.) PRODUCT EXPLANATION EXAMPLE: PGP - ADJ - LA J MODEL FEATURES PGS = Shruo ADJ, 360. ADV, 366, ARV, 306 PGP = 4' Poo ADJ, 360, ADV. 36V, ARV, 31411 PGH = 12' Pop -uo ADV, 366, ARV, 3RV Key to Featarer A0.1 - AOIWstable with no check valve 360 = Fulltrtde with no check valve ADV = Adjustable with check valve `." 1 The best nozzles for all jobs With every ?GP you get a complete, interchangeable set of 12 stan- dard or seven low -angle nozzles - free. And they are second to none. Their honest performance stops brown spots with superior close -in coverage and complete distribution uniformity for any radius between 22 and S2 feet. Together they make PCP the one sprinkler that can do the most jobs in residential and light commercial settings. With water- saving efficiency for lush turf, vigorous shrubs and satisfied owners year after year. LOW ANGLE N • - A' .q Nozzle PSI 30 4 40 50 60 30 5 40 50 60 30 6 40 50 60 30 7 40 50 60 30 8 40 50 60 30 9 40 50 60 40 10 60 70 P OPTIONS 66 = 12 Standard Nozzles 0R: LA • 7 Low -Angle Nozzles 01 • 12 = Factory- Installed Standard Nozzle 4 - 10 LA • Factory-Installed Low-Angle Nonle 36V = Fulltrrcle with check valve ARV = Adjustable. Reclaimed Water, with check valve 306 = FulFcikcle. Reclaimed Water with check valve Radius ft. GPM 22' 1.4 24' 1.7 26' 1.8 28' 2.0 25' 1.6 27' 1.9 28' 2.1 30' 2.3 27' 2.1 30' 2.5 33' 2.8 35' 3.0 29' 2.8 32' 3.1 35' 3.5 37' 3.8 31' 3.4 34' 3.9 37' 4.4 38' 4.7 33' 4.3 37' 5.0 40' 5.6 42' 6.1 38' 6.5 40' 7.3 42' 8.0 44' 8.6 Blank nozzle plug for turning off selected sprinklers during repairs, maintenance, etc. Data represent test results in zero wind. Adjust for local conditions. Radius can be reduced by up to 30% with nozzle retaining screw. (This may alter the uniformity of the spray pattern.) Available From Performance data are derived from tests that conform to ASAE Standard 5398.1. See Hunter Irrigation products catalog for complete ASAE Certification Statement. Hunter Industries Incorporated • The Irrigation Innovators Printed on recycled paper. 1940 Diamond St. • San Marcos, CA 92069 • U.S.A. • Tel' 619 - 744 -5240 • Fax: 619 - 744 -7461 LIT -019 3:96 H uinte r PGM Rotary Sprinklers 1 C aught someplace between too -big- for -a -spray and too - small- for -a- rotor? The PGM more than meets the situation halfway and compromises on nothing when it comes to quality and performance. Already capable of working in tandem with larger rotors to combine big and small areas in a single zone, this popular product now includes "radius adjustment" Radius adjustment and new nozzles: . keep water where you want it • 1111111111.111111r Mr: • • No more fishing around through a sea of choices for the right nozzle to meet your specific needs. Now, each PGM rotor comes complete with a single rack of five simple nozzles that work in tandem with the new radius adjustment feature built into each individual sprinkler. Offering you the ability to easily fine - tune the spray and keep water off your hardscape with a simple turn of a screw, radius adjustment has been one of the product enhancements most often requested by Hunter customers worldwide. As for those nozzles, you'll appreciate their easy installation and find their new ID system makes good sense — each nozzle is now identified by its easy -to -read flow rate. for fine - tuning the spray to keep water off driveways, walks and other non - landscaped surfaces. Plus, we've also included a rack of five entirely redesigned nozzles — now easily identified by flow rates — that can be installed and changed faster and easier than ever. In theory, Hunter has created a mini -PGP. But, in reality, here's a rotor so special it's unlike anything else. Economical, Scaled -Down Rotor for Mid -Range 'Areas Models PGM -00 — Shrub PGM -04 — 4" Pop -up PGM -06 — 6" Pop -up PGM -12 — 12" Pop -up MODEL PGM -00 = Shrub PGM-04 = 4' Pop - up PQM -06 = 6' Pop - up PGM -12 = 12' Pop - up • FEATURES & BENEFITS 40 – 360 adjustable arc Dimensions • Overall height: PGM -00 — 6'/2" PGM -04 — 6`/N" PGM -06 — 8` /N" PGM -12 — 15 • '/2" female inlet • Exposed diameter: 1'/4" New radius adjustment Allows fine tuning of spray, ensures positive nozzle retention Easily adjustable from top of sprinkler, up, down, wet or dry Proven gear drive Matches superior reliability of time - tested PGP drives Heavy -duty riser seal Stops wasteful excess flow 3.0 Variable stator Keeps rotation speed consistent regardless of nozzle size or pressure Extra large filter screen Traps more debris without clogging Optional factory- installed drain check valve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prevents wet spots MICO EXAMPLE: PGM - 06 - A - V ARC OPTIONS A = Adjustable R = Reclaimed Water Identifier with Drain Check Valve V = Factory- Installed Drain Check Valve Operating Specifications • Discharge rate: .75 to 3.0 gpm • Radius: 17' to 30' • Pressure range: 30 to 50 psi • Precipitation rates: approx. 0.45" per hour at 40 psi for spacings from 17' to 30' Nozzle PSI 30 .75 40 50 30 1.0 40 50 30 1.5 40 50 30 2.0 40 50 30 40 50 Radius ft . 17' 18' 18' 20' 2V 21' 23' 24' 24' 25' 27' 27' 28' 30' 30' • GPM .64 .75 .85 .85 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.5 3.0 3.4 Data represent test results in zero wind. Adjust fret local coo:daunts. Radius may be reduced up to 25% with adjustment screw (this may alter the unif of the spray pattern). Optimum performance is shown in bold type. Performance data are derived from tests that conform to ASAE Standard 5.398.1. See Hunter Irrigation products catalog for complete ASAE Certification Statement. Available from: Hunter Industries Incorporated • The Irrigation Innovators Printed on recycled paper 1940 Diamond Street • San Marcos, California 92069 • U.S.A. • Tel: 619- 744 -5240 • Fax: 619 - 744 -7461 P/N 700297 LIT -156 7/96 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L A R G E T U R F S P R I N K L E R S 640 Series The number one sprinkler choice tnr athletic fields is equipped with a standard ruhher cover and optional effluent markings. 6-& 5talulard nr111ter cater L , to `4' be/ow-;round installation Exposed surface: 2.50' Stainless-steel-encased drfte assemWv 40 41 42 43 Toro 640 Series Sprinklers 47' -67' Radius Features • Selection of 5 nuzzles and 12 arcs • Valve -In -Head 1nornlally- open hydraulic nuxleLLl • Adjustment screw allows up to 25% radius reduction • Standard rubber cover • Check- O -Matic models available - eliminating low -head drainage • Up to !_" below - [.round installation Nozzle PSI Radius 40 47' 50 50' 60 52' 70 53' 80 54' 90 55' 4U 48' 50 53' 60 5 +' 5i' 80 56' 90 57' 40 52' 50 55' 60 56' 70 57' 80 58' 90 58 40 36' 50 59' 60 59' 70 61' 80 63' 90 64' 40 55' 50 60' 60 61' 70 63' 80 65' 90 67' Ire 16 • Vandal- resistant cap with kicking set screw • Small exposed surface diameter • stainless- steel - encased nozzle and drive assembly • Gear -drive design • Basket filter screen • Stainless -steel retraction spring • Pop -up design • Durable engineering plastic brass and stainless -steel construction • J 360' 270' GP11 ■ ❑ d ❑ 6.0 0.25 0.26 0.33 0.35 6.7 0.25 0.26 0.33 0.34 7.3 0.25 0.26 0.33 0.35 8.0 0.26 0.27 0.35 0.36 8.6 0.27 0.28 0.36 0.38 9.2 0.28 0.29 0.37 0.39 9.5 0.38 0.40 0.50 0.53 10.2 0.33 0.35 0.44 0.4 11.0 0.35 0.36 0.46 0.48 11.9 0.36 0.38 0.48 0.50 12.7 0.3" 0.39 0.49 0.52 13.4 0.38 0.40 0.50 033 12.0 0.41 0.43 0.54 0.57 12.9 0.39 0.41 0.52 0.55 14.0 0.41 0.43 0.55 0.57 14.7 0.42 0.44 0.55 0.58 15.8 0.43 0.45 0.57 0.60 16.8 0.46 0.48 0.61 0.64 13.2 0.39 0.41 0.51 0.54 14.5 0.38 0.40 0.51 0.53 15.7 0.41 0.43 035 0.58 17.0 0.42 0.4-4 0.56 0.59 18.3 0.42 0.44 036 0.59 19.4 0.44 0.46 0.58 0.61 16.7 031 0.53 0.67 0.71 18.6 0.47 030 0.63 0.66 19.9 0.49 0.52 0.65 0.68 21.9 0.51 0.53 0.67 0.71 23.4 031 0.53 0.68 0.71 25.0 0 51 034 0.68 0.'1 Specifying Information 1 )- Special Arc 1 -90 2 -180 -r0 -4-360 1 -X.O V'aIve- to -Head :- Cheek- O-Made IU 1I 12 43 14 045 148" 060 1 - i 11)8 192 t2 _3.$ For E'amplc hen ,txxilcing .1 fr111 tire. Sprinkler a nh .1 I0$ . •43 nuzzle and a eh ' k salve. you u I .pet-de 640.02.43-108 gia .Special Valve Type Nozzle .a Optional E- Effluent Model No zz le 27• Mlaxunum 111. Id Spray 14'I1" It' - + 2 li' 4 3 18'8' 4t (41 I'SI 44 19 ) 4 '4 PSI 1 1 1 0. Specifications • ,,,,L„,,,,.._...... • Fhlw rue: It.9 -_5.0 GI'NI • Recommended operating pressure: In -'8) PSi • Maximum operating pressure: 150 PSI • Pop -up to nozzle: 2':" • 1" female- threaded inlet. BSP threads available • Trajectory: 27* Apex at 50 PSI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.77 0.72 0.74 0.77 0.77 0.77 640 Series Performance Chart 4110 238' A ❑ A 0.38 0.40 0.47 0.37 0.39 0.16 0.38 0.39 0.47 0.40 0.41 0.49 0.41 0.43 0.51 0.42 0.44 0.52 0.57 0.60 0.71 0.50 0.53 0.63 0.52 0.55 0.65 0.55 0.57. 0.68 0.56 0.59 0.70 0.57 0.60 0.71 0.62 0.65 0.76 0.59 0.62 0.73 0.62 0.65 0.77 0.63 0.66 0.78 0.65 0.68 0.81 0.69 0.73 0.86 0.59 0.61 0.73 0.58 0.61 0.72 0.63 0.66 0.78 0.64 0.67 0.79 0.64 0.67 0.79 0.66 0.69 0.82 0.80 0.75 0.78 0.80 0.81 0.81 0.95 0.89 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.96 192' 180' 173' 148' 0 0.49 0.48 0.49 0.51 0.53 0.55 0.74 0.66 0.68 0.71 0.73 0.74 0.80 0.77 0.81 0.82 0.85 0.90 0.76 0.75 0.81 0.82 0.83 0.86 1.00 0.93 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.01 0 0. 50 0.49 0.50 0.52 0.54 0.56 0.76 0.67 0.69 0.72 0.7.1 0 '6 0.82 0.78 0.82 0.83 0.86 0.92 0.77 0.77 0.83 0.84 0.85 0.87 1.01 0.95 0.98 1.01 1.02 1.02 • I)intensums: • Exposed surface diameter: _ "_' • Body diameter: _' • Cap diameter: 3'." • Body height: Check- O- 3latic 9" Valve -in -head: 10'." • Check -O -. Lltic maintains 15' elevation change 0 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.55 0.57 0.59 0.79 0.70 0.73 0.76 0.78 0.79 0.85 0.82 0.86 0.87 0.90 0.96 0.81 0.80 0.87 0.88 0.89 0.91 1.06 1.00 1.03 1.06 1.07 1.07 A 0.52 0.51 0.52 0.54 0.56 0.58 0. 0.69 0.72 0. -5 0.7 0. - 9 0.85 0.82 0.85 0.87 0.90 0.96 0.80 0.80 0.86 0.8 0.88 091 1.06 0.99 1.02 1.06 1.06 I. 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.57 0.59 0.61 0.83 0.73 0.76 0.79 0.81 0.83 0.89 0.85 0.89 0.91 0.94 1.00 0.84 0.83 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.95 1.11 1.04 1.07 1.11 1.11 1.12 A 0.61 0.60 0.60 0.64 0.66 0.68 0.92 0.81 0.84 0.88 0.91 0.92 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.01 1.05 1.12 0.94 0.93 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.06 1.23 1.15 1.20 1.23 1.24 1.24 0 0.64 0.63 0.63 0.67 0.69 0.71 0.9 0.85 0.88 0.92 0.95 0.97 1.04 1.00 1.05 1.06 1.10 1.17 0.99 0.98 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.11 1.29 1.21 1.25 1.29 1.30 1.30 0 0.71 0.70 0.70 0.74 0.77 0.79 1.0 0.95 0.98 1.02 1.06 1.07 1.16 1.11 1.16 1.18 1.22 1.30 1.10 1.09 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.23 0 0.74 0.73 0.74 0.78 0.81 0.83 1.13 0.99 1.03 1.07 1.11 1.13 1.21 1.16 1.22 1.24 1.28 1.36 1.15 1.14 1.23 1.25 1.26 1.29 108' A ❑ 0.83 0.87 0.82 0.86 0.83 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.90 0.95 0.93 1.26 1.11 1.16 1.20 1.24 1.26 1.36 1.31 1.37 1.39 1.44 1.53 1.29 1.28 1.38 1.40 1.41 1.45 640 640 Check- O -Matic Valve-lrr -Heart 0.98 1.32 1.17 1.21 1.26 1.30 1.32 1.42 1.37 1.43 1.45 1.51 1.60 1.35 1.34 1.45 1.4 1.48 1.52 A 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.05 1.08 1.12 1.52 1.33 1.39 1.45 1.49 1.52 1.63 1.57 1.64 1.66 1.73 1.84 1.55 1.53 1.66 1.68 1.69 1. -4 • 90' 1.44 1.51 1.69 1.77 2.03 2.13 1.35 1.41 1.58 1.66 1.90 1.99 1.39 1.46 1.64 1. 1.97 2.06 1.44 1.51 1.69 1.77 2.03 2.13 1.44 1.51 1.70 1. -8 2.04 2.13 1.45 1.52 1. 1.'9 2.05 2.15 60' 45' ❑ A ❑ 0 ❑ 1.05 1.50 L57 2.00 2.09 1.03 1.48 1.55 1.9- 2.06 1.04 1.49 1.56 1.98 2.08 1.10 1.57 1.65 2.09 2.19 1.14 1.63 1.70 2.17 2.27 1.17 168 1. 2.24 2.34 1.59 2.27 2.38 3.03 3.18 1.40 2.00 2.10 2.67 2.80 1.45 2.08 2.18 2.91 1.52 2.17 2.27 2.89 3.03 1.56 2.23 2.34 2.9s 3 12 1.59 2.27 2.38 3.03 3.18 1.71 2.45 2.56 3.26 3.42 1.64 2.35 2.46 3.14 3.29 1.72 2.46 2.58 3.28 3.44 1.74 2.49 2.61 3.33 3.49 1.81 2.59 2.71 3.45 3.62 1.92 2.75 2.89 3.67 3.85 1.62 2.32 2.43 3.09 3.24 1.60 2.30 2.41 3.06 3.21 1.74 2.49 2.61 3.32 3•'. 1.76 2.52 2.64 3.36 3.52 1.78 1.54 2.66 3 39 3.55 1.82 2.61 2. 3.48 3.65 3.04 3.19 2.85 2.99 2.95 3.09 3.04 3.19 3.05 3.20 3.07 3.22 4 06 3.80 3.93 4.06 4.0 4.09 4.25 3.98 4.12 425 4.27 29 •APrecipitatton rates are for triangular spacing. shown in inches per hour. calculated at 55"9 of diameter. ❑ Precipitation rates are for square spacing. shown in inches per hour. calculated at itris of diameter All performance specifications are based on the stated working pressure available at the hale of the spnnklcr head. Note: For the 640. differing arcs canna be valved together. INSIDE P EPS Need to adjust flow, arc and radios quickly and reliably? Tbc V -1550 allows all three without changing nozzles. See page 32 PWP 1 Data Sheet: Streamline Solvent Weld Pipe -IPS Size 1 IPS Pressure Rated PVC Nominal Average Approx. minimum Approx. Pipe Outside Inside Wall Approx. Length per Crate I Size Diameter Diameter Thickness Weight Crate Weight List Price (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) (ibs710011) (feet) it's) (S /t00ft1 'h 0.840 0 70 0.062 10 10,000 1000 $ Y 1.050 0.88 0.078 16 8100 1270 I 1 1315 1 10 0.097 25 6300 1540 1'/ 1.660 139 0. 123 39 3920 1540 1'h 1.900 1.59 0141 51 3020 1550 2 2.375 1.99 0176 80 2100 1690 21/2 2.875 2.41 0 213 118 1460 1720 3 3.500 2.94 0 259 174 1500 2610 4 4.500 3.78 0333 288 960 2760 I (OVER) General Notes: 1 1 All pipe is NSF listed. 2. The following pipes are IAPMO listed: PR 200 bell end -'h, 1, 11/4, 1 2, 21/2. 3, and 4 inch. PR 315 bell end -'h 2, 21, 3, and 4 inch, PR 315 plain end - 2, 2'h, 3, and 4 inch. 3. Pipe material is in conformance with ASTM 01784 (cell class 12454 -B). 4. Pipe conforms to ASTM D2241. 5. Pipe is produced with bell end or plain end in 10 -foot and 20 -foot lengths Check with PWPipe for availability. 6. Inside diameters vary due to allowable manufacturing tolerances 7. Approximate weights are for estimating purposes only. 8. Crate weights are for 20 -toot lengths. 9. All orders are subject to final acceptance at the Eugene office. May 1994 1 Streamline P.R. 160 - SDR 26 Nominal Average Approx. Minimum Approx Pipe Outside Inside Wall Approx. Length per Crate Size Diameter Diameter Thickness Weight Crate Weight List Price (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) (Ibs7100ft) (feel) (lbs) ($7100ft) I 11/4 1.660 1.52 0.064 21 3920 830 $ 11/2 1.900 1.74 0 073 28 3020 840 2 2.375 2.18 0.091 43 2100 910 2'h 2.875 2.64 0.110 63 1460 920 I 3 3.500 3.21 0.135 94 1500 1410 4 4.500 4.13 0 173 155 960 1490 5 5.563 5.10 0.214 237 760 1800 6 6 625 6.07 0.255 337 520 1760 I 8 8.625 7 91 9 66 0.332 571 300 1710 10 1D 750 0.413 885 240 2120 12 12 750 11.70 0.490 1250 120 1500 1 Streamline P.R. 200 -SDR 21 Nominal Average Approx. Minimum Approx. Pipe Outside Inside Wall Approx. Length per Crate Size Diameter Diameter Thickness Weight Crate Weighl List Price I (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) (lbs1100ft) (feet) (lbs) (S/l00tq 'l. 1.050 0 92 0 12 8100 1000 S 1 1.315 118 0.063 16 6300 1030 1% 1.660 149 0.079 26 3920 1020 11/2 1.900 1 70 0.090 34 3020 1020 2 2.375 2.13 0.113 53 2100 1110 2'h 2.875 2.58 0.137 78 1460 1140 3 3.500 3.14 0.167 115 1500 1730 I 4 4.500 4.04 4.99 0.214 190 960 760 1830 5 5.563 0265 290 2210 6 6.625 5.94 0.316 413 520 2150 8 8.625 7.74 0 410 698 300 2090 1 Streamline P.R. 315 -SDR 13.5 ' PACIFIC WESTERN EXTRUDED PLASTICS COMPANY P O. Box 10049, Eugene, Oregon 97440 Telex No. 151040 PWPIPE (503) 343 -0200 Reoraei No 813 5/94 Average number of solvent cemented joints per pint of cement. IPS CEMENT NUMBER 'h" dia Y." 1" 13' 11/2" 2' 3" 6" 8" 10" 12" 711 175 135 88 65 49 37 22 18 6 4 3 2 717 175 135 88 65 49 37 22 18 6 4 3 2 705 140 97 69 47 35 26 18 15 710 130 90 60 44 33 25 l •-■•■••••••••-•-- I] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • Excellent chemical and corrosion resistance • Outstanding stress crack resistance • Lightweight and flexible • Superior abrasion resistance • NSF tested and certified for potable water • High long term hydrostatic strength • Tough and ductile • Municipal water service lines • Well piping • Lawn sprinkler systems • Swimming pools • Livestock watering lines • Potable water distribution lines • Farm and ranch irrigation • Fiber optic innerduct NSF -pw Potable water Interstate PE3408 High Density Polyethylene Pipe Interstate PE3408 Pipe is manufactured from a high density, very high molecular weight polyethylene compound specifically designed for high hoop stress, outstanding stress crack resistance, and low temperature toughness. Performance Features and Benefits Interstate PE3408 pipe has outstanding physical properties. It does not rot; rust; pit or corrode through chemical or electrical reactions with the surrounding soil whether it is acidic, alkaline, wet or dry. It neither supports the growth of, nor is it affected by algae, bacteria, or fungus. it is also resistant to marine biological attack. Protection against ultraviolet degradation during extended periods of outside storage and above ground service use is provided by the addition of carbon black and chemical thermal stabilizers. Typical Applications for Interstate PE3408 Pipe • Industrial water distribution • Oil patch lines • Drilling supply lines • Sewer lines • Marine lines • Process cooling lines • Ground source heat pumps • Electrical conduit evergreen Pacific ur& North 7710 Market St. Spokane, WA 99207 (509) 467-6601 FAX (509) 467-9317 Satisfying the Irrigation Industry Since 1976 •-■ ,`.} • 1..4 • .. .11tr. - ....7:', - ta.w.ir,S.r.7r0 -- 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t LASCO® FLUID DISTRIBUTION PRODUCTS Schedule 40 PVC List Prices Effective: May 5, 1997 Tee NEW 401 -003 401 -005 401 -007 401 -010 401 -012 401 -015 401 -020 401-025 (slip x slip x slip) 401 -030 401 -040 401 -050 401 -060 401 -080 Tee Reducing PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE (EA ) 100 4.61 50 1.48 50 1.69 1 50 3.18 1 25 4.99 11/2 25 6.05 2 25 8.79 2 10 28.99 3 10 38.02 4 5 68.83 5 4 166.31 6 4 231.81 8 2 537.62 (ic 3 /e 3 /4 PART 110. SIZE CARTON PRICE 00 401 -094 3 /4x'/ 2 x' / 401 -095 3 / 4 x' / x 3 /4 401 -101 3 / 4 x 1/4 x'/ 401 -122 1 x '/2 x 1 I r . " 401 -124 1 x 3 / 4 x' / 401-125 1 x x 3 /4 401 -126 1x x1 401 -130 1 x 1 x' / 401 -131 1x1x (slip x slip x slip) 401 -156 1'/4 x 1 x' / 401 -157 1'/ x 1x 3 / 4 401-158 11/2 x 1 x 1 401-166 11/4 x 1'/ 401 -167 1'/ x 11/4 x 3 / 4 401 -168 11/2x11/2x 1 401 -199 11/2x 1'/ 401 -201 1'/ x 1'/ x 3 / 4 401 -202 1'/ 401 -203 11/2 x 11/4 x 11/2 401 -209 1'/ x 1'/ 401 -210 1'/ x 11/2 x 3 /4 401 -211 1'/ x 11/2 x 1 401 -212 11/2x 11/2x 1'/ 401 -238 2 x 11/2 x 3 / 4 401 -239 2 x 11/2 x 1 401-241 2 x 1'./ x 1'/ 401 -247 2 x.2 x1/2 401-248 2x2x% 401 -249 2 x 2 x1 401 -250 2 x 2 x 1'/ 401 -251 2x2x1V 401 -287 21/2 x 2'/ x' / 401 -288 21/2 x 2'/ x 3 /4 401 -289 2'/ (Or. l (or, ) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 (EA.) 2.86 2.86 1.96 5.62 5.62 5.62 5.62 3 -35 3.63 7.66 7.66 7.66 5.44 5.44 5.44 9.57 9.57 9.57 9.57 9.57 9.57 9.57 9.57 13,64 13.64 13.64 9.39 9.39 9.39 9.39 9.39 28.92 28.92 28.92 PART 110. SIZE CARTON PRICE Tee Reducing (con't. ) Tee (slips slip x slip) Tee Bullhead ('a ) I I! ) (e..) 401 -074 r3x1/2 x 50 3.13 401 -102 ' x' /. x 1 50 5.62 401 -132 i x 1 x 1Y4 50 7.53 401 -133 1 x 1 x11/2 25 9.75 401 -213 11/2 x 11/2 x 2 25 13.64 401 -341 3x3x4 10 71.11 (slip x slip x slip) PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE Transition Tee tit -- (slip x slip x insert) PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE • t (slip x slip x FIPT) 401 -290 401 -291 401-292 401 -333 401 -334 401 -335 401 -336 401 -337 401 -338 401 -416 401 -417 401-418 401 -419 401 -420 401 -422 401 -486 401 -488 401 -490 401 -528 401 -530 401 -532 401 -582 401 -585 1102 -249 402 -005 402 -007 402 -010 402 -012 402 -015 402 -020 402 -030 402 -040 2'/ x 2'/ x 11/4 2'/ 2'/ x 21/2 x 2 3x3x'/ 3x3x 3x3x1 3x3x1'14 3x3x 1'/ 3 3x3x2 4x4x 4x 4x1 4x4x1'/ 4x4x1'/ 4x4x2 4x4x3 5x5x2 5x5x3 5x5x4 6x6x2 6x6x3 6x6x4 8x8x4 8x8x6 2x2x1 ( IN '/2 (arv.) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 (EA 28.92 28.92 28.92 41.38 41.38 41.38 41.38 41.38 41.38 68.83 68.83 68.83 68.83 68.83 68.83 161.46 161.46 5 161.46 5 231.81 5 231.81 5 231.81 2 537.62 2 537.62 (crr.) 10 9.60 (e4) (C'Y.) ([A ) 50 L96 50 3.02 50 5.62 25 8.97 25 11.65 10 14.75 10 57.33 5 87.55 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE Tee Reducing Tce -34tf (slip x slip x I'11''1 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE (slip x FIPT x slip) (IN ) 402 -071 1 / 2 x 1 / 2 x' /, 402-072 1/2 x' / x '/4 402-074 '/ x 3 / 4 402 -094 % x' / x' / 402 -095 % x' / x' / 402-101 1 /4 x 3 ' x' / 402 -124 1 x 3 /4x'/2 402 -125 1 x %X 3 / 4 402 -130 1 x 1x'/ 402 -131 1 x 1x'/ 402 -156 1'/ x 1x'/ 402 -157 1'/ x 1x'/ 402-166 11/4X 1'/ 402 -167 11/4 x 11/4 x 3 / 4 402 -168 11/4X 11/4 x 1 402-199 11/2x 11/4x ;z 402-202 11/2x 11/4 x 1 402 -209 1 x 1'/ 402-210 11/2 x 1'/ 402 -211 11/2x 11/2 x 1 402 -212 11/2X 11/2X 11/4 402 -239 2 x 11/2 x 1 402 -247 2 x 2 x 1/2 402 -248 2 x 2x'/ 402 -249 2 x 2 x 1 402 -250 2 x 2 x 11/4 402 -251 2 x 2 x 11/2 402 -287 2Y x 21/2 x 1 / 2 402 -288 21/2 x 21/2 x 3 / 4 402 -289 21/2 x 21/ x 1 402 -290 2Y x 21/2 x 11/4 402 -291 2 x 21/2 x 11/2 402 -292 2 x 21/2 x 2 402 -333 3 x 3x'/ 402.334 3x3x% 402 -335 3 x 3 x 1 402 -336 3 x 3 x 11/2 402 -337 3 x 3 x 11/2 402 -338 3 x 3 x2 402 -416 4x4x 402 -417 4 x 4 x1 402 -418 4 x 4 x 11/4 402 -419 4x 4 x 1'/2 402 -420 4 x 4 x 2 402 -422 4 x 4 x3 402 -490 5 x 5 x 4 402-528 6x6x2 402-530 6x 6x 3 402 -532 6x 6 x4 403 -005 403 -007 (EA) (ore) 50 4.24 50 4.24 50 4.24 50 3.00 50 3.00 50 2.56 50 5.63 50 5.63 50 3.92 50 5.63 25 8.96 25 8.96 25 9.39 25 9.39 25 9.39 25 11.65 25 11.65 25 11.65 25 11.65 25 11.65 25 11.65 10 14.67 10 14.67 10 14.67 10 14.67 10 14.67 10 14.67 10 31.80 10 31.80 10 31.80 10 31.80 10 31.80 10 31.80 10 45.40 10 45.40 10 45.40 10 45.40 10 45.40 10 45.40 4 75.80 5 75.80 5 75.80 5 75.80 5 75.80 5 75.80 5 198.07 5 256.98 5 256.98 5 256.98 (Ea ) 50 1.96 50 3.02 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE Tee 90' E1.1. 90° ELI, Reducing (FIPTxFIPTxFIPT) (slip x slip) 90° ELL Reducing (slip x slip) 90° ELL (FIPT >lihi (slip x FIPT) NEW 405 -005 405 -007 405 -010 405 -012 405 -015 406 -003 406 -005 406 -007 406 -010 406 -012 406 -015 406 -020 406 -025 406 -030 406 -040 406 -050 406-060 406 -080 406 -101 406 -130 406-131 406 -168 406 -211 406 -212 NEW 406 -249 406-250 406 -251 407 -005 407 -007 407 -010 407 -012 407 -015 407 -020 407 -025 407 -030 407 -040 407 -074 407 -101 407 -130 407 -131 407 -168 407 -211 407 -212 NEW 407 -249 NEW 407-250 407-251 (IN.) 1'4 1'/ 1 1'. 2 2 3 4 5 6 (IN } 3 /4X % 1 x / 1 x 3 / 4 1'/ 1'/ 1'/ x 1' / 2x1 2 x 11/4 2x1'/ (N) /2 (LN.) '/2 X 2 /4 3 / 4 x '/ 1 x1/ 1 x% 1'/ x 1 11/2x 1 11/2 x 1'/ 2x1 2 x 1'/4 2 x 1 Z (ory } 50 50 50 25 25 PART NO SIZE CARTON PRICE (Jr.. 100 50 50 1 50 25 25 25 10 10 5 5 4 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE (oIY } 50 50 50 25 25 25 25 25 25 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE (o� ) 50 1.48 50 1.69 1 50 3.18 1'/ 25 5.28 11/2 25 5.88 2 10 15.27 2 10 37.65 3 10 56.42 4 5 85.59 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE ( 50 3.18 50 1.78 50 4.88 50 4.88 25 7.14 25 11.83 25 12.28 25 20.42 10 20.42 10 20.42 I E 5.41 8.48 11.81 16.36 16.80 (El. 5.98 1.21 1.33 2.41 4.24 4.51 7.14 21.65 25.91 46.39 119.93 147.53 379.95 2.41 3.56 4.28 6.75 10.67 10.67 18.28 18.28 18.28 (1a) v(1` ELL (FIPT x FIPT) PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE 90° Street ELL (sp x slip) 90° Street ELL (MIPT x slip) 90° Street ELL (sp x FIPT) PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE 408 -005 408 -007 408 -010 408 -012 408 -015 408 -020 409 -005 409 -007 409 -010 409 -012 409 -015 409 -020 411 -005 411 -007 411 -010 411 -012 411 -015 ' /2 50 2.88 50 4.28 1 50 9.08 11/2 25 9.74 11/2 25 12.25 2 10 18.64 (IN.) (ulw ) '/2 50 50 1 50 1 1 /4 25 1'/ 25 2 10 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE (N.) (cry ■ 410 -005 1 /2 50 2.56 410-007 3 /A 50 3.02 410 -010 1 50 5.13 410 -012 1' 4 25 7.14 410-015 1 25 7.43 410-020 2 10 18.32 410 -101 3 x 1 /2 50 3.77 (IN.) '/z (OTV.) ILA.) (LA ) 3.35 4.12 7.14 8.48 9.39 18.28 (rA f PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE (EA ) 50 3.25 3 / 4 50 3.87 1 50 6.79 11/2 25 8.19 1 1 / 2 25 9.28 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE 90- Street ELL (MIPT x FIPT) ) 412 -005 1 /2 PVC 412 -007 3 /4 PVC 412 -010 1PVC 412 -012 11/2 PVC 412 -015 1 1 / 2 PVC M412 -005 !/; Poly" M412 -007 '/ Poly' M412 -010 1 Poly' • NOT 1.ISTEO BY NS! ) 50 3.48 50 4.28 50 7.33 25 9.08 25 9.86 50 3.25 50 3.88 50 6.80 ui ) PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE Side Outlet 4 90° ELL 413-010 (slip x slip x slip) (ore ) 25 (EA.) 11.24 Side Outlet 90° ELL (slip x slip x FIPT) PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE 45° ELL Cross PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE Cr Reducing (slip x slip) (slip) (slip) Long Socket Coupling PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE 417 -005 417 -007 417 -010 417 -012 417 -015 417 -020 417 -025 417 -030 417 -040 417 -050 417 -060 417 -080 ) 414 -005 1/2 50 414 -010 1 25 414-101 3 / 4 x % x '/ 50 414 -130 lx1x1/2 25 1/ 3 /. PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE 420 -005 420 -007 420 -010 1 420 -012 11/2 420 -015 11/2 420 -020 2 420 -025 21/2 420 -030 3 420 -040 4 428 -015 50 1.96 50 3.02 1 50 3.63 25 5.14 1' 2 25 6.40 2 25 8.35 21/2 10 21.68 3 10 33.66 4 5 60.46 5 5 119.93 6 4 149.28 8 4 359.14 SIZE CARTON PRICE (;.t) 5.92 7.40 1 1 ,/ 2 3/4 ( /4l I 50 50 50 25 25 10 420 -335 3 x 3 x 1 x1 10 420 -337 3x3x11/2x 152 10 420 -338 3x3x2x2 10 420 -419 4x4x1 5 420 -420 4x4x2x2 5 PART NO. 1'/ (1.825) 25 428 -020 2 ('1.945) 25 'Socket depth, each aide For Nested and t)ecp Socket Couplings. See page 6. rA 1 6.27 11.24 8.13 10.62 I' 4.51 7.57 9.39 12.44 14.09 20.77 8 44.03 10 54.01 5 80.03 1 47.17 47.17 47.17 78.88 78.88 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t Coupling Reducer (; IIplin Cnuplin: PART 110. SIZE CARTON PRICE (N) (ar.) NEW 429 -003 3 / 3 100 429 -005 14 100 429 -007 3 /, 50 429-010 1 50 429 012 13/4 25 , 429 -015 11/2 25 .. 429 -020 2 25 429 -025 21/2 10 ` ICI ' ) 429 -030 3 10 429 -040 4 5 429 -050 5 4 429 -060 6 5 429 -080 8 4 i slip) (FIPT x FIPT) PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE Riser Extender (MIPT x FIPT) PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE Female Adapter (slip x Flt'T) Nc.tcd mid Uccp Socket Couplings. See page 6. PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE (N.) 429 -101 3 / 4 x Y, 429 -131 1 x' /, 429 -168 11/4X 1 429 -212 1'/ x 1 429 -251 2 x 11/2 429 -338 3 x 2 429 -422 4 x 3 429 -532' 6 x 4 429.585' 8 x 6 *Cell factory for eveil.Mlin. PART 140. SIZE CARTON PRICE 430 -005 430 -007 430 -010 430-101 430 -131 430 - 005 -45 430-007-45 430 - 101 -45 430 - 131 -45 434.005 434 -007 434 -008 434 -020 435 -005 435 -007 435 -010 435 -012 435 -015 435 -020 435 -025 435-030 435 -040 435 -050 435 -060 435 -080 (IN.) 34 1 3/ x 1 x3/4 / %Gray %x' / Gray 1 x% Gray ' / 2 %6Ig. 3/,x1 1g. 3/4x 2% 2 ( N.) (on.) 50 50 25 25 10 5 4 4 4 (ar.) 100 50 50 50 50 100 50 50 50 (or. 50 50 50 25 (or 100 50 1 50 1'/ 25 11 25 2 25 2 " 10 3 10 4 5 5 5 6 4 8 4 (EA.) 2.12 .80 1.08 1.87 2.56 2.75 4.28 9.39 14.74 21.27 38.99 67.33 125.68 (EA.) 1.96 3.36 5.62 5.97 9.52 51.06 63.81 84.21 215.62 (EA.) 1.54 2.75 3.64 5.66 6.22 1.53 2.47 5.66 6.22 (EA.) 2.17 3.62 3.75 9.29 1.33 1.69 1.96 3.02 3.48 4.68 11.85 15.93 26.37 68.23 96.98 182.83 PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE Female Adapter Reducing (slip x FIPT) .N1 alt.' Ad plc 436 -005 436 -007 436-010 436 -012 436 -015 436 -020 436 -025 (MIPT x slip) 436 -030 436 -040 436 -050 436 -060 436 -080 (MI.) (or.) 435 -074 1/2X % 50 435 -101 x 50 435 -102 1/4 x 1 50 435-131 1 x 1/4 50 435 -211 1 x 11/2 25 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE (IN.) '/2 (OT l 1.3 1 2.41 2.41 3.17 3.17 6.40 (!A.I 100 1.08 3 b 50 1.21 1 50 2.13 15, 25 2.57 11/2 25 3.48 2 25 4.55 10 13.49 3 10 19.72 4 5 25.15 5 5 41.46 6 4 65.64 8 4 298.25 PART 140. SIZE CARTON PRICE Male Adapter (h) Reducing NEW 436 -073 '/ x 3 /6 100 2.12 436-074 1/2 x 2 /, 50 2.13 436-101 3 /4 x 1/2 50 1.96 436 -102 3 /, x 1 50 3.02 CI 436 -131 436-132 1 x 50 6.51 1 x 1' ; 25 7.14 436-168 1'/, x 1 25 8.01 436-169 1' /, x 1', 25 8.01 436 -212 11/2 x 11/4 25 9.66 (MIPT x slip) 436 -213 1 x 2 10 9.66 436-251 2 x 11/2 10 11.08 436-252 2 x 21/2 10 17.21 436 -293 21/2 x 3 10 20.83 436 -341 3 x 4 10 33.33 PART No. SIZE CARTON PRICE 1Zcduccr (ar.) Bushing NEW 437 -073 '/ 100 2.28 437 -101 3 /, x 1/2 100 1.25 437 -130 1 x' / 100 2.29 437-131 1 x 3 % 100 2.29 437 -166 1'/ x'/ 25 3.02 437 -167 11/4 x % 25 3.02 4 437-168 437-209 1'/, x 1 25 3.02 1'/ x '/ 25 3.19 437 -210 11/2 x 3 / % 25 3.19 s.. 437-211 1'/ x 1 25 3.19 437 -212 11/2 x 11/4 25 3.19 1, c ai 437 -247 2 x' / 10 5.28 437 -248 2 x % 10 5.28 437 -249 2 x 1 10 5.28 437 -250 2 x 11/4 10 5.28 437-251 2 x 11/2 25 5.28 437 -287 21/2 x '/2 10 8.51 437-288 21/2 x 3/4 10 8.51 437 -289 21/2 x 1 10 8.51 ) (EA.) I educcr Bushing (cont.) (sp x slip) Reducer Bushing ( sp x FI 1''1'1 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE 437-290 437 -291 437 -292 437 -334 437 -335 437 -336 437-337 437 -338 437 -339 437 -420 437 -421 437 -422 437 -488 437 -490 437 -528 437 -530 437 -532 437 -534 437-582 437.585 (iN.) 21/2 x 1 21/2 x 1'/ 2'/ x 2 3x 3x1 3 x 1% 3x1'/ 3x2 3 x 2'/ 4x2 4x21/2 4x3 5x3 5x4 6x2 6x3 6x4 6x5 8x4 8x6 (I' ) 438 -071 1/2 x /, 438 -072 1/2 x /4 438 -073 1/2 x 3 / 4 438 -098 3 / 4 x' /4 438 -101 3 / 4 x'/ 2 438 -130 1x'/ 438 -131 1 x 3 / 4 438 -166 11/4 x 1/2 438 -167 11/4 x 3 / 4 438 -168 1'/ x 1 438 -209 1'/ 438 -210 11/2 x 3 / 4 438 -211 11/2 x 1 438 -212 11/2 x 1'/4 438 -247 2 x 1/2 438 -248 2 x ?; 438 -249 2 x 1 438 -250 2 x 1'/4 438 -251 2 x 1'/ 438-289 21/2 x 1 438-290 21/2 x 11/4 438 -291 21/2 x 11/2 438-292 2'/ x 2 438-335 3 x 1 438 -336 3 x 11/4 438 -337 3 x 11/2 438-338 3 x 2 438 -339 3 x 21/2 438 -420 4 x 2 438 -421 4 x 21/2 438 -422 4 x 3 438 -490 5 x 4 438 -532 6 x 4 (orv.) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 Ira l 8.51 8.51 8.51 12.61 12.61 12.61 12.61 12.61 12.61 28.18 28.18 28.18 39.56 39.56 69.73 69.73 69.73 69.73 5 243.17 5 243.17 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE (orv. ) 100 100 100 50 100 100 100 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 (FA) 2.57 2.57 2.57 2.57 1.98 3.17 3.17 4.88 4.88 4.88 5.63 5.63 5.63 5.63 7.57 7.57 7.57 7.57 7.57 10.91 10.91 10.91 10.91 12.61 12.61 12.61 12.61 12.61 5 28.09 5 28.09 5 28.09 5 54.80 5 102.92 Threaded Bushing (;:,p Cop (MIPT x FIPT) (FIPT) PART P10. SIZE CARTON PRICE (N.) 439 -005 1/2 x' / 439 -052 3 / e 439 -072 1 / 2 x / 439 -073 1/2 x 3 / 6 439 -098 3 / 4 x' / 439 -099 3 / 4 x 439 -101 3 /4 x' / 439 -130 1 x' / 439-131 1 x /4 439-166 1'/ 439 -167 11/4 x 1/4 439 -168 1'/ x 1 439 -209 1'/ 439 -210 1'/ x 439 -211 1'/ x 1 439 -212 1'/ x 11/4 439 -249 2 x 1 439 -250 2 x 11/4 439 -251 2 x1 439 -292 21/2x 2 439 -338 3 x 2 PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE 447 -005 447 -007 447 -010 447 -012 447 -015 447 -020 447 -025 447 -030 447 -040 447 -050 447 -060 447 -080 PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE 448-005 448 -007 448 -010 448 -012 448 -015 448 -020 448 -025 448 -030 448 -040 (arv.) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 10 10 10 10 5 1+ ) (arr'.) '/2 100 1.08 3 /4 100 1.25 1 50 1.98 11/ 25 2.75 11/2 25 3.02 2 25 3.64 2'/ 10 11.65 3 10 12.75 4 5 28.99 5 5 48.67 6 5 69.45 8 4 174.49 (or() 1 // 100 ' -a 100 1 50 1'r 25 1'. 25 2 10 21/ 10 3 10 4 5 (EA .) 2.17 5.63 5.63 5.63 3.48 3.48 3.48 4.88 4.88 7.29 7.29 7.29 8.79 8.79 8.79 8.79 9.39 9.39 9.39 32.94 38.82 (EA.) (EA. 2.28 2.57 3.92 4.68 4.88 8.63 12.75 16.69 29.24 FI Female Iron Pipe Thread MIP'I' Male Iron Pipe Thread slip Solvent Cement Socket sp Spigot T.13.E. Threaded Both Ends T.O.F Thread One End insert Itorhed • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Phu! Plug Adapter PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE (MIFF) PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE (insert x slip) Nested Coupling (slip) Fitting Adapter (sp x FIPT) Deep Socket Coupling (IN.) (on.) (EA.) 449 -005 '/2 50 2.57 449 -007 3 / 4 50 3.02 449 -010 1 50 3.64 449-012 11/4 25 4.88 449 -015 11/2 25 6.22 449 -020 2 10 7.73 449 -025 2'/ 10 13.17 449 -030 3 10 17.42 449 -040 4 5 39A0 450-005 450 -007 450 -010 450 -012 450 -015 450 -020 450 -025 450-030 450 -040 474 -007 474 -010 474-015 (IN.) 2 /4 1 11/4 1'/ 2 2'/ 3 4 '/S 1'/ (on.) 50 50 50 25 25 10 10 10 (EA .) 3.19 3.45 5.62 5.92 6.38 8.19 11.37 17.28 5 38.97 (on.) 50 50 25 (EA-) 4.55 4.83 8.47 PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE Qty.) 477.005* 1/2' 100 477 -007 1/4 50 477 -010 1 50 * nested couplings do not meet ASTM Standards for Sch.401 fittings and are not NSF listed. PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE 478 -010 478 -012 478 -015 (IN.) * Socket depth, each side. (On.) 1 25 1'/ 25 1K 25 *See Swing Joint Price List:discounts will vary (EA.) .98 1.08 1.87 (EA.) • • 4 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE (IN.) (on.) (EA.) 482 -015 1% (1.169) 25 7.28 482 -020 2 (`2.389) 25 12.03 482 -025 21/2 ('3.385) 10 15.48 Ntdrib , 482 -030 3 ('3.625) 10 23.32 482 -040 4 ('3.625) 5 46.83 (slip i PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE Union (0 -Ring type) (slip x slip) PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE Union (0 -Ring type) 458 -005 1 /2 10 13.09 458 -007 '/ 10 21.85 458 -010 1 10 29.76 458 -012 1'/4 5 51.15 458 -015 11/2 5 52.31 458-020 2 5 64.23 Pressure rated at 150 ps.i. at 73.41' (FIPT x FIPT) Buna -N 0 -Ring PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE Venturi Tee aPPLLigr Wye Mnsetr- / (slip) Plug PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE (spy) 90° Elbow Bullhead Tee (s x s x spigot) Adapter (MIPT x red slip) 40213 40216 40220 40225 40226 40231 White PVC Union (IN -) IT, ) 457-005 '/ 10 11.64 457 -007 2 / 4 10 13.32 457 -010 1 10 13.63 457 - 012 11/4 5 44.00 457 -015 11/2 5 45.88 457 -020 2 5 61.85 Pressure rated at 150 p.s.i. at 73.4 (IN.) (on.) (EA.) (a. (onY.) (EA.) '/2 5 3.47 3 / 4 5 3.79 1 5 4.74 11/4 5 8.11 11/2 5 8.84 2 5 10.84 Pool / Spa Products PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE ( i (on.) 473 -825 %(1) x 1 x 1' 50 473 -210 11/2(2) x 11/2 x' /4(1) 25 (EA.) 3.18 3.88 NOTE: Bracketed dimensions are OD /Spigot sizes 81640.00 B1221-00 B1231-00 PART N0. (IN.) (on.) (EA.) 1 50 2.39 (IN. (oTY.) (EA.) 50 .52 1 50 .63 SIZE CARTON PRICE (a.) (on .) (EA.) 81241-00 11/2 25 2.11 (iN.) (ore .) (EA B1171 -00 1x1 x1'/ 25 2.11 PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE (IN.) (otv.) (EA.) B1251-00 2 x 11/2 25 1.87 LASCO® FLUID DISTRIBUTION PRODUCTS Sales and Marketing 3255 E. Miraloma Avenue Anaheim, CA 92806 714/961 -9755 FAX: 714/524 -1694 4780 Holly Street, Unit A Denver, CO 80216 303/388 -7204 303/388 -7208 FAX: 303/388 -7199 3450 Vineland Rd. Orlando, FL 32811 407/648 -5955 . FAX: 407/649 -7999 311 Richert Wood Dale, IL 60191 630/860 -7402 FAX: 630/860 -7416 3401 Pennsy Dr. Ardmore - Ardwick lnd'i. Pk. Landover, MD 20785 301/322 -3377 FAX: 301/772 -1627 1228 -A Crowley Circle Carrollton, TX 75006 972/446 -8776 FAX: 972/466 -2280 22473 72nd Ave. So. Kent, WA 98032 206/872 -0185 FAX 206/395 -0221 LASCO' RUM msnun ei RIOOOCTI Headquarters 540 Lasco Street Brownsville, TN 38012 901/772 -3180 FAX: 901/772 -0835 Printed in USA. L06 40P - 40MI 5/97 Limited Warranty LASCO Fluid Distribution Products are made from 100% virgin materials and are warranted to be free from manufacturing defects in materials and workmanship. They are warranted against rot, rust and electrolytic corrosion for a period of 3 years from date of installation. If LASCO products prove defective due to manufacturing defects in material or workmanship during that period, the manufacturer will provide new replacement units of the same type and size. No remedy will be granted under this warranty if LASCO products are not used strictly in accordance with LASCO's direc- tions with respect to use and storage or If the products have been modified in any way. THE MANUFACTURER'S LIABILITY UNDER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED WARRANTY OR FOR ANY REASON IS LIMITED TO FURNISHING REPLACEMENT UNITS OR GRANTING A CREDIT FOR DEFECTIVE UNITS. NO LABOR EXPENSE OR CONSE- QUENTIAL DAMAGES WILL BE PAID BY LASCO. THIS WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER GUARANTEES AND WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUD- ING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR PURPOSE, EXCEPT FOR ANY WARRANTIES IMPLIED BY LAW FOR NONCOM- MERCIAL CONSUMERS. ANY SUCH WARRANTIES ARE LIMITED TO THE DURATION OF THIS WRITTEN WARRANTY. • DO NOT USE LASCO FITTINGS FOR COMPRESSED AIR OR GASES. • DO NOT TEST PVC PIPING SYSTEMS WITH COMPRESSED AIR OR GASES. • DO NOT USE FITTINGS WITH LIQUIDS NOT RECOMMENDED BY LASCO. • MODIFICATIONS OF FITTINGS VOIDS THE WARRANTY. STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS — Schedule 40 ASTM D -1784 — Rigid Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (PVC)Compounds and Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Compounds. ASTM D -2464 — Threaded Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Plastic Pipe Fittings, Schedule 40. ASTM D -2466 — Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Schedule 40. Socket Type Pipe Fittings MATERIAL — LASCO Schedule 40 Fittings arc produced from PVC Type 1, Cell Classification 12454 -R LISTINGS — NSF (National Sanitation Foundation)for potable water services Standard Terms and conditions of sale 1. Terms: 2% 10th prox. Net 30th. 2. Freight: FOB LASCO warehouses. Prepaid on orders for products only totaling $1000 net for one shipment to single destination within the contiguous United States. 3. Minimum Order: $50 net. Smaller orders billed at this minimum charge. 4. Claims for shipping errors must be made within 15 days to LASCO. Claims for damage or shortages should be directed promptly to the common carrier by the consignee. 5. Returns will be accepted only by prior authorization and if shipped freight prepaid. Returned merchandise subject to a 20% handling/restocking charge. 6. Pricing is subject to change without prior notice. However, prior notification will be given in the event of price changes in the period between order placement and scheduled shipment. 7. Offer to sell is not implied by possession of this or other LASCO price lists http:llwww.Iascofittings.com iD 1997 LAS(X) Fluid Distribution Product., Division of Tamkins Industries. Inc. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LASCO FLUID DISTRIBUTION PRODUCTS Insert Fittings PVC & Nylon List Prices Effective: May 5, 1997 'Fey ( insert) Reducing Te. Reducing Tee Transition Tee PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE (insea-t x insert x miming insert) (ureertxnxtucingin crtx redo i ginsert) (slipxslipxinsert) 1401 -005 1401 -007 1401 -010 1401 -012 1401 -015 1401 -020 1401 -030 NYLON N401 -005 N401-007 N401 -010 N401 -012 N401 -015 N401 -020 PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE 1401 -101 1401 -130 1401 -131 1401 -166 1401 -167 1401 -168 1401 -209 1401 -210 1401-211 1401 -212 1401 -247 1401 -248 1401 -249 1401 -250 1401 -251 1102 -249 (iN.) 1 1'/ 1'/ 2 3 40 1.31 25 1.42 1 20 2.33 1'. 10 4.19 1'', 10 5.27 2 10 7.11 12 3 '4 40 25 20 10 10 10 5 ON.) 3 / 4 x % x 1/2 1x1x'/ 1x1x 1Y, x 11/4 x' / 11/4 x 11/4 x 3 / 4 1'/4x1 11/2x 11/2x1/2 11/2x 11/2X% 5 1 x 11/2 x 1 5 11/2 x 11/2 x 11/4 5 2x2x'/ 5 2x2x 5 2x2x1 5 2x2x1'/ 5 2x2x1'/ 5 2x2x1 lc�.l 25 20 20 10 10 10 5 .96 1.06 1.38 2.14 2.44 4.81 17.31 (14 1.19 1.40 1.42 1.84 1.84 1.84 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 4.55 4.55 4.55 4.78 4.92 PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE 1401-094 1/4 x / x' / 20 1.31 1401 -125 1 x 20 2.29 1401-157 11/4 x 1 x % 10 2.62 1401 -158 1 1 x 1 10 2.62 1401 -202 11/2 x 11/4 x 1 5 3.29 1401 -203 11/2 x 11/4 x 11/4 5 3.29 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE (r• ? ( 10 • See Schcdu le 40 Price List; discounts will vary. Bullhead Tcc (inert xunertx mat) PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE (111 1401 -074 1 / 2 x x 3 / 4 10 2.64 1401 -102 3x 1 10 3.03 1401 -132 1 x1 x1 5 4.24 PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE Combination and ('" ) 50 x 1402 -005 Reducing Tee '/ 1 /2 x '/2 1402-007 3 /4 x' / x 3 / 4 25 1402-010 1 x 1 x 1 15 1402-012 1 10 1402 -015 11/2x 11/2x 1'/ 5 3/ X 1402-020 5 1402 -1101 1 3 / 4 x' /, x' / 25 1402 -130 1 x 1 x 1/2 20 (ircmrtxinsertxFll'T) 1402.131 1 x 1 x ' /4 20 1402 -166 11/4 x 1'/ 10 1402 -167 11/4x 11/4x1/4 10 1402 -168 11/4 x 11/4 x 1 10 1402 -209 11/2 x 1 5 1402-210 1'/ 1Y 5 1402-211 11/2x 11/2x 1 5 1402 -212 1'/ x 1 x 11/4 5 1402 - 247 2 x 2 x 1/2 5 1402 2 x 2 x 3 /4 5 1402 -249 2 x 2 x 1 5 1402 -251 2 x 2 x 11/2 5 (EA) 1M6 1.59 t87 2.75 4.78 5.91 1.31 1.74 1.74 2.36 2.61 2.75 3.63 4.29 4.29 4.40 4.87 5.14 5.65 5.91 PART N0. SIZE CARTON PRICE Combination/ Reducing Tee 1402 -094 1402 -124 1402 -125 1402 -156 1402 -157 (insert x red u kit ginticrt euducingFll'T) PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE Combination Tee i (insert x insert x MIPT) 1403 -005 1403 -007 1403-010 1403-012 1403 -015 (m 1/4 x x '/ 20 1x1/4x1/2 10 1x / 10 11/4 x 1 x 1/2 10 1'/ x 1 x 1/4 10 I 25 1.34 20 1.84 1 10 2.36 11/4 10 3.06 11/2 5 3.45 (' 3' 1.73 2.15 2.56 3.19 3.73 90" Elbow (insertxi>t>sert) Reducing Elbow (insert x reducing insert) _:ombination (educing 90° Elbow (invert x FIPT) PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE 1406 -005 1406 -007 1406 -010 1406 -012 1406 -015 1406 -020 1406 -030 NYLON N406 -005 N406 -007 N406 -010 N406.012 N406 -015 N406 -020 1406 -101 1406 -131 1406-168 1406 -212 1407 -005 1407 -007 1407 -010 1407 -012 1407 -015 1407 -020 1407 -101 1407 -130 1407 -131 1407 -166 1407 -167 1407 -168 1407 -211 1407 -212 1407-251 ON.) 1 (CITY.) (QTY.) (FA.) '/2 50 .89 '•; 50 1.09 1 25 1.20 1., 10 1.34 11/2 10 1.59 2 10 2.22 3 8 12.64 50 1.04 50 1.33 1 25 1.42 11/4 10 2.41 10 3.54 2 10 5.91 PART NO SIZE CARTON PRICE 25 1.03 10 1.26 10 1.87 10 2.22 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE (h.) x' / 50 1.01 3 /4 x 1/4 25 1.09 1 x 1 25 1.40 1' / 10 2.07 1 x 11/2 10 236 2 x 2 5 4.00 %x' /, 50 1.03 1 x' / 25 1.09 1 x' / 25 1.26 1'/ 25 1.87 1 10 1.87 1'/ x 1 10 1.87 1'/ x 1 10 2.12 11/2 x 1 10 2.31 2x 1V 2 5 3.77 (E A ) Combination 90° Elbow (White PVC) (invert xslip) Combination 90" Elbow t . 1'1 1 \l (in ert x m11'7) (inert invert PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE 127 -957 50 4.05 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE 1413 -005 1413 -007 1413 -010 1413-012 1413 -015 1413 -020 NYLON N413 -005 N413.007 N413-010 N413 -012 N413 -015 1420-007 1420-010 1429 -005 1429 -007 1429 -010 1429 -012 1429 -015 1429 -020 1429 -030 1429 -040 NYLON N429 -005 - N429 -007 N429 -010 N429 -012 N429 -015 N429 -020 (ed.) 3, 1 11/4 1'/ 2 2 (IN.) 3 /4 (CITY.) 50 50 1 40 1',1; 20 11/2 20 2 10 3 10 4 '/ l 25 1.12 25 1.55 10 2.03 10 2.71 10 3.59 10 5.66 25 1.71 2 /4 25 3.35 1 10 3.85 1'/ 10 4.52 11/2 10 2.31 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE (EA.) 10 2.55 10 3.17 (QTY.) PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE .46 .54 .58 .85 1.00 1.90 8.31 8 11.31 • 2 50 .64 50 .75 1 40 .99 1 a 20 1.78 1'; 20 2.32 2 10 2.79 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Reducing Coupling (insertxreducing invert) PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE Female Adapter (insert xFIPT) Male Adapter (insert x MIPT) PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE (IN.) 1429 -101 1/4 x' / 1429-130 1 x' /, 1429 -131 1 x 3 / 4 1429 -167 1'/ 1429 -168 1'/4 x 1 1429 -210 1' / x' / 1429 -211 11/2 x 1 1429 -212 11/2 x 11/4 1429 -249 2 x 1 1429 -250 2 x 11/4 1429 -251 2 x 11/2 1435-005 1435 -007 1435 -010 1435-012 1435 -015 1435 -020 1436 -005 1436 -007 1436-010 1436 -012 1436 -015 1436 -020 1436 -030 1436 -040 NYLON N436-005 N436 -007 N436 -010 N436 -012 N436 -015 N436 -020 (IN.) '/ (IN.) '/ ((1 50 40 40 20 20 20 20 10 10 10 10 (Orr.) 30 3 /4 30 1 30 114 25 11 15 2 10 (Olv) 50 50 1 40 1', 20 1'/ 20 2 10 3 10 4 8 .75 1.02 .76 1.56 1.20 1.90 1.82 1.42 2.56 2.39 2.28 (EA.) 1.98 2.15 2.39 2.93 3.73 6.30 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE (;A ) .45 .54 .57 .90 1.00 1.91 9.05 12.60 '/ 50 .64 3 / 4 50 .76 1 40 .99 11/4 20 1.64 11/2 20 2.17 2 10 2.79 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE Reducing Male Adapter (reducinglMMIPT xinsert) Reducing Male Adapter (MIPTxreducing unit) Pool Adapter Insert Plug 2: length (MIPTxsp) 1436 -074 1436 -075 1436-102 1436 -132 1436 -133 1436-169 1436 -213 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE (orr.) 1436 -101 3 / 4 x' / 50 1.28 1436 -131 1 x 1/4 30 1.31 1436 -167 11/4 x 3 /4 25 1.56 1436 -168 11/4 x 1 25 1.67 1436-211 11/2 x 1 25 2.03 1436 -212 11/2 x 11/4 20 2.03 1436 -251 2 x 11 10 3.42 PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE (IN.) 1436 -170 11/4 x 11/4 1436 -205 1'/ x 1'/ PART NO. SIZE CARTON PRICE 1449 -005 1449 -007 1449 -010 1449 -012 1449 -015 1449-020 (IN f 1/2 x' / 50 1.42 '/,x1 50 1.46 2 / 4 x1 50 1.46 1 x 11/4 15 1.78 1 x 1'/ 15 2.67 11/4x 11/2 10 2.67 11/2 x 2 10 3.46 (IN.) ' /2 (.I- I (Orr,) 25 25 (on%) 100 100 1 40 1'/ 30 11 20 2 10 (EA.) (EA.) (EA. 2.40 2.78 (u) .81 .85 1.13 1.44 1.57 2.78 PART NO. SIZL CARTON PRICE Kiser Extender White PVC) i (MIPT x FIPT) (MIPT x FIPT) Adapter (slip x insert) (PVC pipe to flexible pipe) (IN.) 434 -005 % x 2t /, 434-007 '/. x 1 / 434 -008 1/2 x 21/2 434 -020 2 x 2"/ lg. (ore.) 50 50 50 25 • See Schedule 40 Price List; discounts will vary. (IN.) (onl.) (EA.) tis itePV C ) h 439 - 005 / 1% Ig. 50 itePV • See Schedule 40 Price List; discounts will vary. PART NO. SIZF CARTON PRICE (IN.) (oTY.) ( hlte PVC) 474 -007 '/ 50 474 -010 1 50 474 -015 1 25 (EA. • See Schedule 40 Price List; discounts will va ry. RECOMMENDED INSTALLATION PROCEDURES INSERT (BARBED) CONNECTIONS: Sizes 1/2, 3 / 4 and 1 inch - one clamp directly over barbs. Sizes 1'/ inch and greater - one clamp directly over barbs plus one clamp behind barbs. INSERT DIAMETER DIMENSIONS A NN \ fi E r• zzz/ MAXIMUM DIAMETERS SIZE C E F 1 /2 .605 .445 .665 .%, .800 .630 .865 1 1.005 .805 1.095 11/4 1.325 1.105 1.425 1' /2 1.565 1.345 1.665 2 2.020 1.800 2.125 2'/ 2.420 2.180 2.520 3 3.025 2.775 3.125 4 3.990 3.730 4.090 LASCO FLUID DISTRIBUTION PRODUCTS Printed in USA 311 Richert Wood Dale, IL 60191 630/860 -7402 FAX: 630/860 -7416 3401 Pennsy Dr. Ardmore- Ardwick Ind'l. Pk. Landover, MD 20785 301/3223377 FAX: 301/772 -1627 1228 -A Crowley Circle Carrollton, TX 75006 972/446 -8776 FAX: 972/466 -2280 22473 72nd Ave. So. Kent, WA 98032 206/872 -0185 FAX: 206/395 -0221 LASCO FLUID OW0.1NOl1O,l PRODUCTS Headquarters 540 Lasco Street Brownsville, TN 38012 901/772 -3180 FAX: 901/772 -0835 Sides & Marketing Limited Warranty 3255 E. Miraloma Avenue LASCO Fluid Distribution Products are made from 100% virgin materials and are warranted to Anaheim, CA 92806 be free from manufacturing defects in materials and workmanship. They are warranted against 714/961 -9755 rot, rust and electrolytic corrosion for n period of 3 years from date of installation. If LASCO FAX: 714 /524 -1694 products prove defective due to manufacturing defects in material or workmanship during that period, the manufacturer will provide new replacement units of the same type and size. No remedy will be granted under this warranty if LASCO products are not used strictly in 4780 Holly Street, Unit A accordance with LASCO's directions with respect to use and storage or if the products have been Denver, CO 80216 modified in any way. THE MANUFACTURER'S LIABILITY UNDER EXPRESSED OR 303/388 -7204 IMPLIED WARRANTY OR FOR ANY REASON IS LIMITED TO FURNISHING 303/388 -7208 REPLACEMENT UNITS OR GRANTING A CREDIT FOR DEFECTIVE UNITS. FAX: 303/388-7199 NO LABOR EXPENSE OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WILL BE PAID BY LASCO. THIS WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER GUARANTEES AND WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, 3450 -C Vineland Rd. WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR PURPOSE, EXCEPT Orlando, FL 32811 FOR ANY WARRANTIES IMPLIED BY LAW FOR NONCOMMERCIAL 407/648 -5955 CONSUMERS. ANY SUCH WARRANTIES ARE LIMITED TO THE DURATION FAX: 407/649 -7999 OF THIS WRITTEN WARRANTY. • DO NOT USE LASCO FITTINGS FOR COMPRESSED AIR OR GASES. • DO NOT TEST PVC PIPING SYSTEMS WITH COMPRESSED AIR OR GASES. • DO NOT USE FITTINGS WITH LIQUIDS NOT RECOMMENDED BY LASCO . • MODIFICATIONS OF FITTINGS VOIDS THE WARRANTY. STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS — Insert Fittings ASTM D -2609 — Plastic Insert Fittings for Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Pipe ASTM D -1784 — Rigid Poly (Vinyl Chloride)(PVC) Compounds and Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC)Compounds. MATERIAL — LASCO PVC Insert Fittings are produced from PVC Type 1, Cell Classification 12454 -R LISTINGS — NSF (Na tional Sanitation Foundat ion) for potable water service& Standard Terms and conditions of sale 1. Terms: 29610th prox. Net 30th. 2. Freight: FOB LASCO warehouses. Prepaid on orders for products only totaling $1000 net for one shipment to single destination within the contiguous United States 3. Minimum Order: $50 net. Smaller orders billed at this minimum charge. 4. Claims for shipping errors must be made within 15 days to LASCO. Claims for damage or shortages should be directed promptly to the common carrier by theconsignee 5. Returns will beaccepted only by prior authorizations and if shipped freight prepaid. Returned merchandise subject to a 20% handlingrestockingcharge. 6. Pricing is subject to change without prior notice. However, prior notification will be given in the event of price changes in the period between order placement and scheduled shipment. 7. Offer lose!! is not implied by possession of this or other LASCO price lists. http:llwww.Iascofitti ngs.com L06- 1F -25M 5/97 0 1997 LASCO Fluid Distribution Products, Division of Tomkins Industries, Inc LASCO FLUID DISTRIBUTION PRODUCTS ull I II N II 1111 III Nipples PVC Schedule 80 & Polyethylene List Prices Effective: May 5, 1997 Four -In -One "Multi Length" Polyethylene Cut -Off Nipple Polyethylene Cut -Off Nipples (Threaded both ends) ♦ - -3 H 1 1 / 2 x 6 and 3 / 4 x 6, MIPT x MIPT, Cut -Off Nipple 1 11111 1111 IIIMII 3 / 4 x '/ x 6, MIPT x MIPT, Cut -Off Nipple :oil 1IIIIIII i111110iiiIIIINii111111I ' 1 / 2 x 6 and 3 / 4 x 6, MIPT x MIPT, Cut -Off Nipple MEN Part No. 5izt M481 -005 '/ x 6 Green 50 .47 M481 -007 3 / 4 x6 Green 25 .68 M481 -101 ILirt No. M461 -005 M461 -007 Part No. • The Four -In -One Nipple allows you to choose which size you need with just one nipple • Reduce inventory • No waste • Reduce contractor down -time :/' Green 50 .52 Standard Quality Polyethylene Cut -Off Nipples Size x 6 ;x6 Color Black Black CPVC Schedule 80 Nipples Size glor 9215 -060 1'/ x 6 TBE CPVC 9215 -120 1 12 TBE CPVC 9220 -060 2 x6 TBE CPVC 9220 -120 2 x 12 TBE CPVC_ Qty ;t! 25 25 10 15 Polyethylene Nipple Discount Varies From PVC 80 Nipples. Consult Factory. Price .2S .44 Price- 7.85 15.73 10.06 20.09 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 UNIFORM PART NUMBERS PRICE TBE TOE SIZE OTY TBE TOE PVC Sch. 80 Nipples 205 -011 205 -020 205 -025 205 -030 205 -040 205 -050 205 -060 205 -080 205 -100 205-120 205 -160 205 -180 205 -240 205 -300 205 -360 205 -480 105 -020 Y x 2 105-025 105 -030 •105 -040 105 -050 •105 -060 105 -080 105 -100 105 -120 105 -160 105 -180 105 -240 105 -300 105 -360 105 -480 105-011 / 1'/,(close) 50 50 1/2x 21/2 50 '/ 50 /2x4 50 / 50 Y 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 x8 /,x10 /,x12 %,x16 %ax18 /ax24 Y,x30 Y, x36 %,x48 $ .34 .37 .40 .43 .47 .55 .61 .72 .86 .97 1.18 1.32 1.61 3.34 5.28 5.69 $ .61 .71 .71 .80 .86 1.05 1.15 1.33 1.60 1.75 2.19 2.39 2.95 3.34 5.28 5.69 UNIFORM PART NUMBERS PRICE TBE TOE SIZE OTY TBE TOE 215 -017 115-017 11 x 13, (close) 25 $ .86 $ 1.62 215 -020 115-020 11/2 x 2 (short) 25 .92 1.62 215 -025 115-025 11/2 x 21/2 25 .97 1.73 215-030 115-030 1' /2 x 3 25 1.07 1.89 215 -040 '115.040 11/2 x 4 25 1.23 2.22 215-050 115 -050 11/2 x 5 25 1.41 2.58 215-060 •115 -060 11/2 x 6 25 1.61 2.94 215 -080 115 -080 11/2 x 8 25 1.93 3.52 215 -100 115 -100 11/2 x 10 25 2.22 4.06 215 -120 115 -120 11/2x12 25 2.55 4.30 215 -180 115 -180 11/2 x 18 25 8.28 828 215 -240 115 -240 11/2 x 24 25 10.45 10.45 220 -020 120-020 2 x 2 (close) 10 $ 1.12 $ 2.06 220 -025 •120.025 2 x 21/2 (short) 10 1.26 2.22 220 -030 120 -030 2 x 3 10 1.33 2.47 220 -040 •120 -040 2 x 4 10 1.55 2.80 207-013 107 -013 '/4 x 11/2 (close) 50 $ .37 $ .71 220 -050 ' 120 -050 2 x 5 10 1.83 3.36 207-020 107 - 020 14 x 2 50 .40 .71 220-060 120 -060 2 x 6 10 2.04 3.71 207-030 107-030 1; x 3 50 .45 .80 220 -080 ' 120 -080 2 x 8 10 2 48 4.58 207 -040 107-040 1/2 x 4 50 .54 .83 220 -100 120 -100 2 x 10 10 2.94 5.37 207 -050 107 - 050 3; x 5 50 .64 1.15 220 -120 120 -120 2 x 12 15 3.37 6.15 207 -060 107 -060 1/2 x 6 50 .75 1.33 220 -140 120 -140 2 x 14 10 6.54 6.54 207 -080 107 - 080 3; x 8 50 .87 1.84 220 -160 120 -160 2 x 16 10 12.64 12.64 207 -100 107 - 100 3 / x 10 50 1.04 1.89 220 -180 120 -180 2 x 18 10 15.09 15.09 207 -120 107- 120 3, x 12 50 1.18 2.19 220 -240 120 -240 2 x 24 10 14 14 14.14 207 -160 107-160 3, x 16 50 1.51 2.75 207-180 107 -180 3', x 18 50 1.58 2.84 225-025 125 -025 21/2 x 2 (close) 5 $ 3.21 $ 4.53 207 -240 107 - 240 3i x 24 50 2.01 3.70 225-030 125 -030 21/2 x 3 (short) 5 3.39 4.68 207 -300 107 -300 3 /, x 30 25 3.74 3.74 225 -040 125-040 21/2 x 4 5 3.88 5.40 207 -360 107 -360 3 /, x 36 25 4.63 4.63 225-050 125 -050 2'/2 x 5 5 4.54 6.67 207 -480 107 -480 3 / x 48 25 6.07 6.07 225 -060 125-060 21/2 x 6 5 5.08 7.20 225 -080 125 -080 21/2 x 8 5 6.07 8.42 210 -015 110 -015 1 x 11/2(close) 50 $ ,54 $ .94 225 -100 125-100 21/2 x 10 5 7.33 10.24 210 -020 110 -020 1 x 2 (short) 50 .58 1.05 225 -120 125 -120 21/2 x 12 10 8.37 11.96 210 -030 110 -030 1 x 3 50 .66 1.15 210 -040 110 -040 1 x 4 50 .77 1.45 230 -026 130 -026 3 x 21/2 (close) 5 $ 3.68 $ 5.40 210 -050 110 -050 1 x 5 50 .97 1.73 230-030 130 -030 3 x 3 (short) 5 3.93 5.55 210 -060 110 -060 1 x 6 50 1.07 1.89 230 -040 130 -040 3 x 4 5 4.65 6.76 210 -080 110 -080 1 x 8 50 1.26 2.51 230 -050 130 -050 3 x 5 5 5.37 8.57 210-100 110-100 1 x 10 50 1.51 2.74 230 -060 130 -060 3 x 6 5 6.03 9.27 210-120 110 -120 1 x 12 50 1.69 3.12 230 -080 130 -080 3 x 8 5 7.47 11.55 210 -160 110 -160 1 x 16 50 2.16 3.98 230 -100 130 -100 3 x 10 5 8.91 13.69 210-180 110 -180 1 x 18 50 2.41 4.40 230 -120 130-120 3 x 12 5 10.11 15.98 210 -240 110 -240 1 x 24 20 2.90 5.23 230 -180 130 -180 3 x 18 5 26.58 26.58 210 -300 110 -300 1 x 30 20 5.93 5.93 210 -360 110 -360 1 x 36 20 11.36 11.36 240 -028 140 -028 4 x 21/2 (close) 5 S 6.03 $ 8.78 210 -480 110 -480 1 x 48 20 13.93 13.93 240 -040 140 -040 4 x 4 (short) 5 6.32 8.94 240 -050 140 -050 4 x 5 5 7.13 12.28 212 -016 112-016 11/2 x 1 (close) 25 $ .69 S .94 240-060 140 -060 4 x 6 5 7.18 12.61 212 -020 112-020 11/2 x 2 (short) 25 .74 1.33 240-080 140 -080 4 x 8 5 9.59 16.12 212 -025 112 -025 11/2 x 21/2 25 .80 1.45 240-100 140 -100 4 x 10 5 11.26 19.67 212 -030 112-030 1' /,x 3 25 .87 1.62 240-120 140 -120 4 x 12 5 13.18 22.35 212-040 112-040 11/2 x 4 25 1.01 1.84 • TOE Nipples - Available From Stock 212 -050 112 -050 11/2 x 5 25 1.20 2.22 212 -060 112 -060 11/2 x 6 25 1.33 2.47 212 -080 112 -080 11/2 x B 25 1.61 3.85 212 -100 112 -100 11/2x 10 25 1.87 3.40 212 -120 112 -120 11/2 x 12 25 2.12 3.85 LASCO FLUID DISTRIBUTION PRODUCTS Printtd in USA Sales and Marketing 3255 E. Miraloma Avenue Anaheim, CA 92806 714/961 -9755 FAX: 714/524 -1694 4780 Holly Street, Unit A Denver, CO 80216 303/388 -7204 303/388 -7208 FAX: 303/388 -7199 3450 Vineland Rd. Orlando, FL 32811 407/648 -5955 FAX: 407/649 -7999 311 Richert Wood Dale, IL 60191 630/860 -7402 FAX: 630/860 -7416 3401 Pennsy Dr. Ardmore- Ardwick lnd'l. Pk. Landover, MD 20785 301/322 -3377 FAX: 301/772 -1627 1228 -A Crowley Circle Carrollton, TX 75006 972/446 -8776 FAX: 972/466 -2280 22473 72nd Ave. So. Kent, WA 98032 206/872 -0185 FAX: 206/395 -0221 LASCO' FLUtD D THeUr10n Pa00t1Crs Headquarters 540 Lasco Street Brownsville, TN 38012 901/772 -3180 FAX: 901/772 -0835 Limited Warranty LASCO fluid distribution products are made from 100% virgin materials and are warranted to be free from manufacturing defects in materials and workmanship. They are warranted against rot, rust and electrolytic corrosion for a period of 3 years from date of installation. If LASCO products prove defective due to manufacturing defects in material or workmanship during that period, the manufac- turer will provide new replacement units of the same type and size. No remedy will be granted under this warranty if LASCO products are not used strictly in accordance with LASCO's directions with respect to use and storage or if the products have been modified in any way. THE MANUFACTURER'S LIABILITY UNDER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED WARRANTY OR FOR ANY REASON IS LIMITED TO FURNISHING REPLACEMENT UNITS OR GRANTING A CREDIT FOR DEFECTIVE UNITS. NO LABOR EXPENSE OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WILL BE PAID BY LASCO. THIS WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER GUARANTEES AND WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR PURPOSE, EXCEPT FOR ANY WARRANTIES IMPLIED BY LAW FOR NONCOMMERCIAL CON- SUMERS. ANY SUCH WARRANTIES ARE LIMITED TO THE DURATION OF THIS WRITTEN WARRANTY. • DO NOT USE LASCO FITTINGS FOR COMPRESSED AIR OR GASES. • DO NOT TEST PVC PIPING SYSTEMS WITH COMPRESSED AIR OR GASES. • DO NOT USE FITTINGS WITH LIQUIDS NOT RECOMMENDED BY LASCO. • MODIFICATIONS OF FITTINGS VOIDS THE WARRANTY. STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS - Schedule 80 Nipples ASTM D -2464 — Threaded Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Plastic Pipe Fittings, Schedule 80. ASTM F-437 — Threaded Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic Pipe Fittings. ASTM D•1784 — Rigid Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Compounds and Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Compounds. ASTM D -1785 — Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Plastic Pipe, Schedules 40, 80, and 120. MATERIAL — LASCO Schedule 80 Fittings are produced from PVC Type 1, Grade 1, Cell Classification 12454 -B. Lasco CPVC Fittings are produced from Type W, Grade 1, Ccll Classification 23447 -B. Standard Terms and conditions of sale 1. Terms: 2% 10th prox. Net 30th. 2. Freight: FOB LASCO warehouses. Prepaid on orders for products only totaling $1,000 net for one shipment to single destination within the contiguous United States. 3. Minimum Order: S50 net. Smaller orders billed at this minimum charge. 4. Claims for shipping errors must be made within 15 days to LASCO. Claims for damage or shortages should be directed promptly to the common carrier by the consignee. 5. Returns will be accepted only by prior authorization and if shipped freight prepaid. Returned merchandise subject to a 20% handling/restocking charge. 6. Pricing is subject to change without prior notice. However, prior notification will be given in the event of price changes in the period between order placement and scheduled shipment 7. Offer to sell is not implied by possession of this or other LASCO price lists. L06- NP -20M 5/97 A 1997 LASCO Fluid Distribution Products. Division ofTomkins Industries, inc. 14 S0110 4 0.1;0 12 SCUD 1 .20: 10 SCUD 4 . 225 3 5.01.10 5 .235 14 7 4 .2:0 12 7 4 215 10 7 4 .240 8 7 5 ..2C0 e 7 5 .340 4 7 5 40 7 5 ,_, 1 19 c ._:0 i/0 1? Q .:Ec0 1 210 19 0 .605 i 3/0 19 4 ._ =C 1 4/0 19 6 ... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 UNDERGROUND F'EE'DER CABLE (UF) INSULATION: POLYVINYL CHLORIDE SIZES: 14 AWG - 4/O AWE 1.0 SC: P.: I.1 Thhiz s_ :~ :=:icn tiers t he rec�irar -en:s Fr Uac r F =_per Cc�ia. Tyre UF, icr use in ccccraance wiin the Ncticncl E:ech ic:1 Ccce cr c_err:icr, cr a pc:a icl cr eV) cr less and cr a temperature cr cC °C cr fens. i r.e_e cccles are c_nsrruced in ccccrcanc_ with Underwriters' Lc- '^ LL 719. Z.O CCNSRU .i N: 2.1 Ccncuctztr. Sc.' crinec;EC, un .' =per c=rc.:. inS t UL Sicnr~r 719, ,Parr 1I._.._- 2.i Insui c>!cn: Ppirir yi cis ^ca. ic.�ning c UL .Et-lc::.^ 71 9, !c rs 22 i 2.3 C.:nstruthcrn floc: UL . e^ry c::ty i'YC, C =:cry, c :r,.�:tTirr� Mcnur:.-cturerrz Identific =!:cn: with Tcnu �..;;cr'i n :.e, H'cta.; .'�..._. Unc.=-wrjte'- ' Lcborc -r.'&j Acarcvci: AID c_cies �-.:II ce 'es ��' crysicc:iy �.d _jec- icc:ly in c: acrdr nce with L.IL 719 and !hail L OG - ocnc SIZE =ME- M i&c CI.'tIE ( cadczt/ .. =.. uc-.c rr 1n r ac .vcv c, a_ :a Part Number Description SP /MC List Price Each DS -100 Drl- Splice Connector (Includes Crimp Sleeve) 25/400 .42 DS -200 Crimp Sleeves 200 .08 DS -300' Dri - Splice Sealant (Approximately 30 connections per 5 oz. tube.) 24* 3.50* 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 The Spears Dri- Splice Seal designed into each wire hole enables you to stock one connector for all applications. The Dri - Splice Seal features an interference webbing which expands to accommodate #10, #12, or #14 gauge wire sizes. In the event only two holes are used, the Dri - Splice Seal prevents sealant from leaking out through the third hole. For use in electrical systems with 30v or less. * Sold in carton quantities only. • One size fits AWG #10, #12, or #14 • Designed to insure waterproof connections • Easily installed in the field without special tools • Permanent protection for underground wire splices — SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR ASSEMBLY INSTRUCTIONS — PRICE SCHEDULE DS -1 -0989 Effective September 27, 1989 Supersedes DS -1 -0485 P /G: 20 improved design of webbing allows easier insertion of wires webbing seals any unused holes to prevent solvent run out. webbing expands to appropriate wire size Prices subject to change without notice. Possession of this price schedule shall not be construed as an offer to sell the products listed. sIS COLORADO 4800 Noma St. Denver 80239 (303) 371 -9430 OUTSIDE COLORADO (800) 525 -1119 FAX: (303) 375 -9546 WIRES BODY (Flexible PVC) 1. Insert wires through holes in base of body. 2. Twist stripped wires together and apply crimp sleeve with an indent type crimping tool. 3. Push wires back into body. 4. Fill cap to brim with sealant and also apply sealer to outside of plug. 5. Invert body and insert plug into body until it snaps tight. 6. Be certain sealant has formed into all holes in body. WARRANTY SPEARS MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Seller" or "SPEARS' ") warrants that the goods covered by this Warranty shall be free from defects in materials andworkmanship for a period of one (1) year from the date of shipment. If Buyer receives defective goods or parts, Buyer may send such defective goods or parts prepaid to Seller's Sylmar, California, facility accompanied by a letter stating the nature of the defect(s). After examination. If there is determined to be a defect in materials or workmanship (of SPEARS), Seller at its option may repair or replace the defective part. or Seller may reimburse Buyer for the cost of such parts) This is Buyer's only remedy. All costs of shipping the defective parts and their replacements to and from Seller's facility at 15853 Olden Street. Sylmar, California 91342. shall be borne by Buyer. Buyer agrees that Seller will not be responsible for other parts or labor in connection with repairing, replacing, or returning such goods or parts (while goods are in possession of Seller for analysis), nor for delays beyond Seller "s reasonable control (including, without limitation, delays due to fire, flood, accident, strike, governmental regulation or other acts of God), provided that any delay shall toll the warranty period for the same amount of time as the delay itself Buyer agrees that this Warranty shall be for one (1) year, so long as the goods shall be given normal usage and operated in conformance with Sellers recommendations and its operating and maintenance instructions. Violation thereof shall void this warranty and relieve Seller from any obligation under this warranty Since performance and production figures. if given, are Seller's best estimates based on its understanding of tooling. molding materials, accessory and other factors, not all of which are within Seller's control, Seller cannot and does not assume responsibility, and expressly disclaims any liability. for failure of the goods to meet such estimates SPEARS EXTENDS ONLY THIS WARRANTY. BUYER SPECIFICALLY WAIVES OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. ORAL OR STATUTORY (INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY OR OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE). APPLICABLE TO THE GOODS OR TO SELLER BUYER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY WAIVES SELLER'S LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION OF ANY KIND OR CHARACTER. INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION LIABILITY PREDICATED UPON STRICT LIABILITY OR TORT. OR INCLUDING ANY OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY FOR INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR SPECIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR WITH RESPECT TO THE GOODS. THEIR SALE OR OPERATION OR THE REPAIR, REPLACEMENT OR RETURN OF ANY PART THEREOF. In the event of the bringing of any legal action by the customer against Spears Manufacturing Company arising herein or hereunder then the party in whose favor final Judgment shall be entered shall be entitled to have, and recover from the other, reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurred, to be fixed by the courts wherein such Judgment is entered THIS WARRANTY MAY NOT BE EXTENDED, ALTERED OR OTHERWISE MODIFIED EXCEPT BY WRITTEN INSTRUMENT SIGNED BY SELLER 4• 4 SPEARS MANUFACTURING COMPANY CORPORATE OFFICE • INTERNATIONAL SALES • DISTRIBUTION CENTER 15853 Olden Street, Sylmar, California 91342 • P.O. Box 9203, Sylmar, California 91392 • (818) 364 -1611 FAX: Order Department (818) 367 -3014, Corporate Offices (818) 362 -1596 • TELEX: 6972762 — REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION CENTERS — FLORIDA 3445 Bartlett Blvd. Orlando 32811 (407) 843 -1960 INSIDE FLORIDA (800) 432 -4762 OUTSIDE FLORIDA (800) 327 -6390 FAX: (407) 425.3563 t1 Spears Manufacturing Company GEORGIA 5044 S. Royal Atlanta Dr. Suite A Tucker 30084 (404)270.0550 (800) 6626328 FAX (404) 496 -0314 Assembly Instructions ILLINOIS 1345 W. Hamilton Pkwy. Itasca 60143 (708) 773 -0075 (800) 662 -6330 FAX: (708) 773 -0435 Printed In U.S.A. 1/90 CRIMP SLEEVE PENNSYLVANIA 543 Industrial Dr. Fairview Industrial Park Lewlsberry 17339 (717) 938 -8844 INSIDE PENNSYLVANIA (800) 821 -1057 OUTSIDE PENNSYLVANIA (800) 233-0275 X. (717) 938-6547 TEXAS 1838 Forms Dr. Carrollton 75007 (214) 245 -0387 INSIDE TEXAS (800) 441 -1437 OUTSIDE TEXAS (800) 527 -0650 FAX: (214) 245.4205 PLUG (Rigid PVC) 4 ".1 paid WASHINGTON 3902'B' St. N.W. Auburn 98002 (206) 939 -4433 (800) 347 -7327 FAX: (206) 939 -7557 DS -1 -0989 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T:. - i . c1 FORD BALL VALVES are idea! for use in wa :er Service lines Tightness •n BOTH d at alt pressures, easy turning. nonbinding and minimum treasure logs —thete character sties ara decal to good engineering design, quatity, and precise manufacturing. Solid cne place tee-head and stem 3 :urdy checks a'low 90' motion an, are enclosed and protected. Heavy cast bronze" body •s engineered to withstand pice Stresses. Ford Bh1 Valves are designed to withstand wonting pressures up to 200 PSI. Variety of end •:onnections avaitaote — for copper, iron, Plastic, or direct to meter. Ends are integral cr secured with 3dncisive to prevent unin;en;cnal dsassembly. Information Features of the Ford Bali Valve A oronze or plastic ring pocks the ste.n- sol dly inb the body of Inc valve. Buna -N O•nngs in the stern assure permanent watertrgnt Seal at top. Molded Burta -N rubber sects support the ba.l. Valve is water tight and i3 a non- directional valve. Spherical 'luorocarbon- coated brass bail provides maximum flow capacity and ease of turning. All Ford Meter Box brass conforms to AWWA Stanoara C800 -139 (ASTh9 B -52 — Index 115 —13S-5-5-5). Options Available COUPLINGS FOR ALL TYPES OF CONNECTIONS Ford Curb Stops and Meter Valves are avarab!e with a wide •:ariery ct connector;. Make year selection from compression, flare, female or m,'e style fittings for Copper, Iron, Polyethylene, Potybutylene. PVC and Lead. Grip Joint instead of Pecx Joint for CTS (tor all sizes) or PEP (313 - or 1') can be ordered by adding - -G' to the end o! Catalog Number EXAMPLE! 9a1- 233.6. 360' TEE HEAD ROTATION Standard Tee Head Stops in body permit 37' turn•oniy. Full 360" tee head ro:aton is ava,lade. Add °R" to Catalog Number, Example; 821 - 3331. VALVE LCCK CAPS Lock Caps are available for 5/8' thru 2'' Ball Valves and 314' Angle Key Valves See Dane 37 to over. HANDLES FOR VALVES Handle for valves are avalable. Crdenng information arc eatonpaons are to inn or payls 38 ant: 37. 2" GATE VALVE OPERATING NUT Adapts Tao Heac on I- 1;4 ".1 -1r2" and 2" Boll Valves (t.t:teo en pages 4 — 10) or oueration wrap standard gate valve wrenches. to order. RECLAIMED WATER BALL VALVE TEE HEAD 4 c :ve tee need with 'Recraimec 'Water latter/1g for easy identr'icatio . is avaitacre on 3/4" thru 2' Salt Valves. Insert 'R W into the Cato; Number. Example: 8y;At 1.333W. PADLOCK WINGS Most Valves are available with Padlocr Wines iexcep: !o' Minreaeolr; v'a:✓e or wicre noted). Add W" to Catalog Number. - W' in the Catalog Number .rdicates valve Is available with oadloc c wings only MINNEAPCLIS PATTERN VALVE Threads are ava (able around tie valve boc .n :'oar MinneaC•l1s '1yr^. 'urb box. 3,1 ar.d 1 valves have 1 -'12' threads; and 2' valves have 2' threads. If an udcit ono' size is tequ:rec ctne• men • he s•zes ;;step. please con:act 1ne tactoy 'or availability. "NEW ENGLAND" IRON PIPE THREADS "New England" iron pipe threads unaer flare copper tuns nut are 2varabte. fris option an be'ourd cn,eaye 34 "OPEN RIGHT" FEATURE Valves with the 'open r!gnt" 'ea:ure are r•;snutaz ::.rec sc :ha valve opens ay :a•ni• the Parole to the FIGHT or clockwise. ;NOTE; Standard Ford ■a vas are typically •rarufacturee so tie valve coons oy fuming trio valve nano a :p the 'r'r o :canter c ookwise.) This option can be founc or pago 35. See page 37 E: :tt �EEt- tt -?tk 6' SIDEWALK 16 +00 17 +00 INDIANA AVENUE 6' SIDEWALK STATION 10 STATION 3 16' UTILITY & ---� DRAINAGE EASEMENT 15 +25.44 INDIANA AVENUE 19 +94.07 HARMONY LANE 13' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT - STATION 6 (20) TORO 570 SPRAY HEADS WATER METER AND CONNECTION DETAIL STATION 7 (66) TORO 570 SPRAY HEADS (9) TORO 640 (11) HUNTER PGP NOT TO SCALE 1" PVC CL200 0 STATION 4 (11) HUNTER PGP (9) TORO 640 SPRAY ROTORS 1" PVC CL200 (TYP.) STATION 9 (66) TORO 570. SPRAY HEADS A V - wV 1 R V CERTIFIED RE • RD ' R ZINGS PROJECT #: 1 1 DATE ACCEPTED: link At ENTERANCE MONUMENT 11 +00 INDIANA AVENUE 1" PVC CL200 13 +00 R.O. 6' SIDEWALK RETAINING WALL 6' SIDEWALK 00 J STATION 1 (FOUNTAIN AND LANDSCAPE AREA) (31) TORO SPRAY HEADS (14) TORO SPRAY HEADS (5) TORO SPRAY HEADS WATER METER / \ (SEE DETAIL) / RAIN DIAL 12 STA. EXT. CLOCK ON POWER PEDISTAL CONTROL WIRE SLEEVED W\ 1" SCH. 80 (12) TORO SPRAY HEADS "THE ENCLOSED' AS -BUILT IRRIGATION PLANS ARE SCHEMATIC IN NATURE AND REPRESENT THE AS —BUILT IRRIGATION SYSTEM INSTALLED AS A PART OF THIS CONTRACT. THESE PLANS ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION REVIEW ON THE PART OF THE SEALING ENGINEER OR INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., RATHER THEY ARE A REPRESENTATION FROM FROM THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR ARTISTIC LANDSCAPE. TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE, ALL HEAD AND CONTROLLER LOCATIONS HAVE BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. STATION 2 (27). TORO 570 SPRAY HEADS ■ -.a \ FOUNTAIN 1" PVC CL200 STATION 10 (30) TORO 570 SPRAY HEADS 1" POLY TO FOUNTAIN HOSE BIB REDUCER 2" BALL VALVES ere DOUBLE CHECK VALVE W/ BACK — FLOW PREVENTOR (2" FEBCO) AND QUICK COUPLER TEE TO 8" W.M. CURB STOP VALVE WATER METER 2" GALVANIZED MAIN PLAT BOUNDARY 13' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT — — 13' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT 2 1/2" MAIN (PVC CL200) \ FENCE 0 STATION 5 (11) HUNTER PGP (9) TORO 640 SPRAY ROTORS (9) TORO 640 (11) HUNTER PGP STATION 7 L 0 10 k 4. LEGEND • 20 1 — 8" ROUND VALVE BOX 1 1/2" HARDIE VALVE W/ FLOW CONTROL 2 1/2" PVC CLASS 200 1" PVC CLASS 200 TORO 570 SPRAY HEADS HUNTER PGM SPRAY ROTORS TORO 640 SPRAY ROTORS HUNTER PGP SPRAY ROTORS ( INFEET) 1 inch = 20 ft. GRAPHIC SCALE GRAPHIC SCALE 10 20 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT ONE -CALL NUMBER 456.8000 CALL TWO BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 0 z N 0 M m w 1- a 0 0 W z 0 W a Ili z O sJ Q o I F= t 0 o w z 0 0 „, N 5 o V) � rn ammionsem n cn Zo CD Z 0 � -- a < 0 <C 0 1— Q w O > oE SHEET 1 OF 2 JOB NUMBER 96106 ASSESSOR 1 1 1 4/3000k. Z077/900 ei/Re 519 1 1 1 1 COACH- LITE ESTATES R 14- 0A .411111. +is Ammar mum. lOr O. 6/6c. ore° 0.111•11,11.11) . . • .• 4111, IIIIIIP OMR . TIMCTS A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE— QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST, W.M., SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON PHASE VI 15' R.O.W. DEDIGATION- -' #810Q180251 ('NOT A PART) PHASE LOTS PHASE 1 31 LOTS PHASE 11 116 LOTS PHASE 111 78 LOTS PHASE I V 54 LOTS PHASE V 80 LOTS TOTAL 365 LOTS Phone: (208) 667 -1171. 100 200 CENTENNIAL TRAIL — - `S W 114 SECTION 208 201 t _LL-- J LITTI. WOOD 1 ANF ed L d f c, 1 11 \ -15' R.O.W. DEDICATION {c: I, 25' BLDG: L7 / \LLYYtN � 1 I` � FUTURE SETBACK • i-< . 1 1 ACQUISITION AREA 1 I .4. `lr I' PRASE VI GRAPHIC SCALE ACREAGE 13.3 AG. 33.7 AG. 22.4 AG. 12.8 AG. 25.0 AG. Fax: (208) RESIDENTIAL PHASING COMMERCIAL PHASING I LOT g.2 AG. 664 -3507 COMMON AREA COMMON AREA 10'7.3 AG. 3.40/4.30 DU /AG GROSS/NET ICU /AG 2.1g/4.00 DU /AG 3.42/550 DU /AG 3.48/4.28 DU /AG 4.23/5.28 DU /AG 3.20/3.85 DU /AG COMMON AREA 2! RIVER LANE MISSION AVENUE N 79'565°. - -- — (EXISTING 5O' R.O.W. 20730 _?61578• RIVERWAY VILLA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA 5 51'0601• E 1 o• SITE COVERAGE 10' FUTURE LOT INFORMATION ACQUISITION AREA COMMON AREA CROSS PROPERTY SIZE NET DEVELOPED AREA RIGHT OF NAY DEDIGATION GOMMON AREA 313 312 3!! 310 301 307 SOUTH 1/4 SECTION 8 -/ /CENTER 1/4 SECTION -25' BLDG. SETBACK 1 VILLA A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SITE DATA 107.5 ACRES 77.2 ACRES 18.2 ACRES 14.8 AGRES(13.8%) TOTAL NO. LOTS: NORTH OF VILLA AVE. 1c16 SOUTH OF VILLA AVE. 167 TOTAL 365 MAXIMUM NUMBER LOTS ALLONED BY P.U.D. 365 5.40 DU /AG 4.13 DU /AG ACTUAL BUILDING SITE COVERAGE I6.4 AGRES(15 %) BUILDING 5I TE GOVERACE PERM I I tD 37.6 AGRES(35%) REVISION BLOCK: BY, DESC, DATE AS BUILT DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: 03/08/44 J.N. 3065 GENEPHAS.D1,16 EXPIRES: 9/23/94 C• THRUST BLOCK GATE VALVE E, FIRE HYDRANT WATER SERVICE DRYWELL )- SEWER SERVICE ' I,JYi. 4111 t 6ENERAL NOTES -HATE? ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE NEW, NSF APPROVED AND INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT NO. Iq 'STANDARDS, CONDITIONS 4 SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN INSTALLATIONS" : ► • T • • ►te- .3 lf3i ; A.W.WA. AND SPOKANE COUNTY. CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT SHALL HENCEFORTH BE Fe! RED TO AS "G.I D.' THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD QF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING FINAL WRITTEN APPROVAL BY THE E SINEEFL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL UTILITIES COMPANIES TO DETERMINE THE LOCATIONS OF UNDER.6ROUND SERVICES. IF THE CONTRACTOR DAMAGES ANY UTILITY, HE SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPAIR THE UTILITY AT 1415 EXPENSE. CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE PREVIOUSLY NAMED STANDARDS AT THE TIME SUCH REPAIRS ARE MADE. NO DEVIATIONS FROM THE PLANS WILL BE ALLOWED i UNLESS APPROVED IN. ADVANCE AND IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER �GOONUI� STANDARDS AND SHALL IN ADHERE TO THE FOLLOWIN6ITH THE ADDITIO REQUIREMENTS PIPE ALL MAID LINES SHALL BE 6400 GLASS 150 SIX OR EIGHT INCH IN DIAMETER* INSTALLED IN THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND AI.GORDf TO THE SPECIFICATIONS NAMED ABOVE. PLACED AT A DEPTH OF 5 FEET EATH THE PAVEMENT (PAVING SURFACE TO TOP OF PIPE MINIMUM OF 5 FEET) IN PEA GRAVEL AS SPECIFIED IN THE DETAILS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS MENTIONED IN THE GENERAL NOTES ABOVE. *q TRACER WIRE 15 TO BE PLACED 24' ABOVE PIPE AND BROUGHT TO THE SURFACE AT ALL FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS. SERVIGIS . WATER SERVICES TO BE STUBBED 5' INTO PROPERTY BEHIND SWALE AREA AND MARKED WITH A 2x4 BURIED ON END WATER METERS AND METER BOXES TO BE INSTALLED BY C.ID. WHEN OWNER REQUEST HOOKUP. FITTING'S AND THRUST BLOCKING FITT'ING'S SHALL BE CAST IRON FLAN6E OR MECHANICAL JOINT. ALL FITTIN65 SHALL BE THRUST BLACKED TO THE SIZE AND LOCATION SHOWN ON THE PLANS, AND BLOCK SHALL BE WRAPPED IN VISQUEEN AND EQUIPPED WITH PICK EYES. FIRE HYDRANTS FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE MUELLER OR M 4 H BRAND AND SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND ACCORDING TO THE DETAILS. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE SET 50 THAT THE CENTERLINE OF THE LARGEST DIAMETER OUTLET 15 SITUATED 1.5 FEET ABOVE TOP FACE OF CURB ON STREETS WITH CURBS OR 2 FEET ABOVE THE EDGE OF PAVING AT THE ROADWAY SHOULDER ON FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE SPOKANE FIRE DISTRI INSTALLATION. LL N0. I. VALVES VALVES SHALL BE MUELLER M 1 H, OR WATEROUS RESILIENT SEAT GATE VALVES AND MUST MEET OR EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED STANDARDS. ALL VALVES SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AN ADJUSTABLE CAST IRON VALVE BOX, TWO PIECE, SLIP TYPE, FOR 5 FOOT WRENCH AND SHALL BE MARKED WATER. VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE PLANS AND ACCORDING TO THE DETAILS. WATER AND SEVER LINE CRO.{5IN65 AT LEAST 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED BEThEEN THE WATER AND SEWER MAINS. IF THE WATER MAIN 15 BELOW THE OR AK BREAKAGE OF THE WATER MAIN. TO IF THE If:* PREVENT INCA OF VERTICAL TI DEFLECTION SEPARATION BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER LINE AND THE TOP OF THE SEWER LINE CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, THE SEWER LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH PIPE WHICH CONFORMS TO WATER MAIN STANDARDS FOR AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY IN EACH DIRECTION FROM THE WATER MAIN. THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE CENTERED AT THE GROSSING SO THAT JOINTS WILL BE AS FAR AS POSSIBLE FROM THE SEWER. TESTING AND DISINFECTION ALL PRESSURE AND LEAKAGE TESTING SHALL 13E ACCOMPLISHED BEFORE COON OF BAGKFILLIN6 AND WITH THE PIPE JOINTS ACCESSIBLE FOR EXAMINATION. SUFFICIENT BAGKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED OVER THE PIPE BARREL BETWEEN JOINTS TO PREVENT MOVEMENT (SEE SECTION II, 118-1 'M' OF 'STAHJDAPDS. 4ONDITIONS 4 SPEGIFICiT FOR'WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION' BY THE MAINS AND RVICE LINES SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTING TO 150 POUNDS TO SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER. WATER SAMPLES SHALL BE TAKEN AND SUPPLIED TO ThE SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT FOR APPROVAL-. FINAL GUARANTEE' ALL WORK SHALL BE AND 15 GUARANTEED SY THE CONTRACTOR FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM AND AFTER THE DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF ALL THE WORK BY THE OWNER IF, WITHIN SAID GUARANTEE PERIOD, REPAIRS OR CHANGES ARE REQUIRED IN CONNECTION WITH 6UARANTEED WORK, WHICH, IN TIE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER, 15 RENDERED NECESSARY AS THE RESULT OF 'THE USE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT OR WORKMANSHIP WHIGN ARE INFERIOR, DEFECTIVE, OR NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL, PROMPTLY UPON RECEIPT OF NOTICE FROM THE OWNER, AND WITHOUT EXPENSE TO ThE OWNER (A) PLACE IN SATISFACTORY CONDITION IN EVERY PARTICULAR ALL OF SUCH 6UARANTEED HORK, CORRECT ALL DEFECTS THEREIN; AND (B) MAKE 6OOD ALL DAMAGE TO THE SITE OR EQUIPMENT THEREON, WHICH IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER, 15 THE RESULT OF THE USE OF MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT OR WORKMANSHIP WHICH ARE INFERIOR, IDEFEGTIVE, OR NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE GONT:'•AGT; AND (G) MAKE 600D MY WORK OR MAIF TERIALS ON ThE SITE DISTURBED IN FULFILLING ANY SUCH GUARANTEE. THE AFTER NOTICE, FAILS WITHIN TEN (IO) DAYS TO PROCEED TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS GUARANTEE, THE OWNER MAY HAVE THE DEFECTS CORRECTED, AND THE CONTRACTOR AND HIS SURETY SHALL BE LIABLE FOR ALL EXPENSE INCURRED PROVIDE, HOWEVER, THAT IN CASE OF ANY EMERGENCY WHERE, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER, DELAY WOULD CAUSE GIVEN TO LOSS OR THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR T AND THE E WITHOUT TPAY TICE BE1N6 COST THEREOF. ENGINEER STAMPED AS-BUILTS SHALL BE SUPPLIED TO THE COUNTY AND WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEATH WITHIN 30 DAYS OF WATER SYSTEM COMPLETION. GENERAL NOTES - SEWER I. GENERAL", ALL SEWER LINE CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE, AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION AS JOINTLY PROMULGATED BY THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE WASHINGTON STATE CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION, Igg4 EDITION, AS ADOPTED AND REVISED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. . THESE PLANS ARE SCHEMATIC AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO DEPICT ALL DETAILS OF THE WORK REQUIRED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS AND FACTORS AFFECTING THE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO COORDINATE WITH SPOKANE COUNTY TO DEVELOP A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED PERMITS. PAVEMENT PATGHIN6 REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE AS DETERMINED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT. 2. PIPE, ALL SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC 114 ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 3034, 5DR 35. 3. TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BAJ,KFILL, ALL TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL SHALL CONFORM TO WSD.O.T. SECTION 7.113 (I)A. ALL BEDDING SHALL CONSIST OF APPROVED BEDDING MATERIAL PLACED AROUND THE PIPE AND BAGKFILLED AS PER WSD.O.T. SECTION 1.113 (1)B. COMPACTION OF BAGKFILL IN ROADWAY SHALL BE PERFORMED TO MEET SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS' REQUIREMENTS. TESTING COLLECTOR SEWER AND SIDE SEWER SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. 4. MANHOLES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DETAILS AS ADOPTED BY SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES-DEPARTMENT. 5. SIDE SEWERS, EACH SEWER SERVICE LINE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET FROM SIDE LOT LINES. EACH SEWER SERVICE LINE AND MAINLINE STUB SHALL BE MARKED WITH A 4 "X4' MARKER POST EXTENDING VERTICALLY FROM THE SEWER SERVICE OR MAINLINE 51143 INVERT TO A MINIMUM OF 24' ABOVE FINISHED 6RADE. EACH 4'X4' MARKER POST SHALL HAVE A 6 6AUGE GALVANIZED WIRE SECURELY ATTACHED FOR ITS ENTIRE LENGTH AND SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED SHOWING THE 4'x4" LENGTH IN FEET AT THE EXPOSED END. 6. AS GUILTS: CERTIFIED REPRODUCIBLE A5 -BUILT DRAt^IIN6S ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY UTILITIES _DEPARTMENT AT THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. 2 HORIZONTAL AND I VERTICAL TIE SHALL BE SHOWN ON AS- GUILTS FOR ALL SIDE SEWER SERVICES, MAIN LINE STUBS, AND GLEANOUTS. STUBS THAT ARE NOT CONSTRUCTED PERPENDICULAR TO SEWER MAIN WILL NEED A STATION ON THE TEE AND A STATION AND OFFSET FROM SEWER MAIN TO END GAP SHOWN ON AS- GUILTS. ANY BENDS IN SERVICE LINE NEED TO BE A5 -BUILT WITH 2 HORIZONTAL SWIN6 TIES TO PERMANENT SURFACE FEATURES. 7. TESTING AND ACCEPTANCE THE LOW PRESSURE AIR TEST METHOD SHALL BE USED. ALL LINES SHALL BE GLEANED AND 1V INSPECTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY SPOKANE COUNTY. b. DEVELOPERS APPROVAL THE UNDERSIGNED DEVELOPER OR HIS ASSIGNS AGREES TO CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS PLAN, AND UPON COMPLETION, 15 RESPONSIBLE TO SUBMIT GERFIFIED REPRODUCIBLE AS-BUILTS DRAWINGS APPROVED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT AND PREPARED BY A PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER. LICENSED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. DEVELOPERS APPROVAL DATE NOTE: THE 'CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTIN6 ALL UTILITY COMPANIES BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION. ANY DAMAGE TO UTILITIES CAUSED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPAIRED AT HIS EXPENSE ONE-CALL (504)4556 -6000 SPOKANE RIVER INDI ANA AVE. CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRIG'T WATER SUPPLIER CERTIFICATION STATEMENT A. CONSOLIDATED 1RRISATION DISTRICT NO. Iq WITH STATE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 10220T HAS APPROVED THIS WATER PLAN FOR RIVERWAY VILLA. THIS WATER PLAN WILL SATISFY OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING ON ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR DOMESTIC AND FIRE PROTECTION FOR ALL PARCELS IN THE ABOVE NAMED PLAN. A MINIMUM OF 30 P51 WILL BE AVAILABLE UNDER ALL NORMAL CONDITIONS. B. APPROPRIATE CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS OR AGREEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE WITH CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT NO. Iq FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE HATER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS APPROVED WATER PLAN. SAID CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS INCLUDE A TIME SCHEDULE ACCEPTABLE TO CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT NO. Iq AND COMMIT THE SPONSOR TO INSTALLATION OF INSPECTED SERVICE LINES TO EACH LOT PRIOR TO ANY APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMITS FOR SUCH LOTS. SIGNATURE TITLE DATE FIRE DISTRICT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT FIRE DISTRICT NO, 1 HAS APPROVED THIS WATER PLAN FOR RIVERWAY VILLA. THE PLAN 15 IN CONFORMANCE WITH OUR REQUIREMENTS AND WILL SATISFY OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR PROTECTION PURPOSES TO ALL SITES IN THE ABOVE PROJECT. SIGNATURE TITLE DATE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH STATEMENT ' THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH HAS APPROVED THIS WATER PLAN AS HAVING MET ALL APPLICABLE STATE REQUIREMENTS. SIGNATURE SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT STATEMENT THE SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT HAS APPROVED THIS WATER PLAN AS HAVING MET ALL APPLICABLE COUNTY DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS. SIGNATURE TITLE DATE SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SUILDINISS THE SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS HAS APPROVED THIS WATER PLAN AS HAVIN6 MET ALL APPLICABLE COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS. - v BALDWIN AVE. AUSUSTA AVE. MISSION AVE. yC 4 Q PROJECT AR (SW 1/4 SECTION 8, T 25 N., VICINITY MAP (NO SCALE) SIGNATURE TITLE TITLE DATE T DATE E3AL17141I N AVENUE AUSUSTA AVENUE EA R 45 E W.M) o+25.O4 OFFSET 65' LEFT 10' SANITARY SEWER AS REQUIRED. (5E'E DETAILS) INv. ELEV { TRACT "B" "STORAGE AREA" -- 26,540 V' / AO 4 1,614 SF 1,38 5F 8p3 5F 1;125 SF I903E/Ib3N 3 8,448 SF 6,13 SF 6,"166 SF 104' 2 6,521 SF 6 ,53 100' 1,408 SF TRACT "A" `COMMON AREA 62,032 sr 2 9,136 SF 4 10,303 SF 5 10,031 SF ri.46.2b. III 5A0 00 b 8,185 SF 0 N q °23'48" E (MEAS.) '1,,, 310.03' (MEAS.) 5 Sc °5q'I I" E (REG.) e75 Epee N 310.00' (REG.) o 4 1-S.% 1.� 0 •. <' 15' R.O.W. DEDICATION 5' RESERVED ACQUISITION AREA I87E 100 3 10' SANIARY P.U.D. BOUNDARY SHEET 2 4 5 6 7 MISSION AVENUE 50 25' BLDG SETBACK 100 \s I88E STREET LOCATION INDEX TITLE SHE ET VILLA AVENUE CLARK FORK STREET KLAMATH RIVER STREET ALLESHENY AVENUE COLORADO RIVER STREET DETAIL SHEET DETAIL SHEET .0 9,133 5F �/ / 2 1591 SF 11+5LO -,. OPF5ET 5.00, LEFT GRAPHIC SC ALE 200 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100 ft. Qdb.9 E/I6 :1 N PLUS SOUTH AND EAST IHV. AS REQUIRED )TR :ET �2 E/14 N7 ' , if .1:7t -V III 1 .4 ! 1 ' % 1 11 li - �� ' 4 e , 6,431 SF 61 31 SF 104' 6,136 SF 1.• 400 184E Qbq. &19b N • OP Lo, N :903 UM)) APPROVED FOR SPO :ENE COU . (f . (TIES,. BY: \L/ ' OA - ' L CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQUIRED! NOTIFY THE PERMIT ENGINEER 456 - 3600 24 HRS. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION o G //.5194 6/1494 ) GL15O WATER MAIN 10' BEYOND PRO.EGT • AS READ. MARK W 2X4( PLANK BURIED rAILS) EXTEND ALL SIDE 51345t LAFS 5' DEYOND RIGHT OF WAY LINE E INSIDE LOTS ITYP. SEE DETAILS) AILS). ` HAIM SERVICE AT 51G_' LOT A MESS OTN$BUSE NOM•.. 5708 SERVICE 5' BEYOND R18NT OF HAY \L.RE MICE LOTS IcIOE A PROPOSED FUTURE DEVELOPMENT - SEE SHEET IA 190.9E /f'IbN IAN I SN 17N I6N RECEIVED JUN 29 1995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER LE EN THRUST BLOCK 0 GATE VALVE j ) FIRE HYDRANT — WATER SERVICE DRYWELL }--- SEWER SERVICE 186 E 0 - 7551 0 -55`-- D' ROA DEDICATION OxA N _ J --�I'IDIAMA- 1 - -J 18551 18 PUP. BOUNDARY 15' RDA DEPIGAT10N L5' mammal AREA I81 E PERI 5.kt 44 if GT1ON e CENTENNIAL TRAIL 25' BLDG. SETBACK 188 E rt MIS6 181 E AVEtI)E N b1•5650' W (D05TIMO 50' RDA 20 110 E 08552 08553 11552 H 111 E -I -I- • BENCH MARK -SOUTH EAST CORNER BRIOGE OVER SPOKANE RIVER.I ELEV. Ig86.16 !)0lT1110 ROA 5.14 1/4 5EG. 8, TWP. 25 N, R. 45 E.W.M. r 'COMMON AREA' 268.16' 10' RDA DEfltCATION I(12 E 1 ,7.1° 1 1 113E I 11 25' BLDG: SETBACK 10' ResegVeo AGGLIIVTION AREA - 1 sounl 1/4 SCOW 200 op OM 206 2w.1I■��w _. 711111 INV* 24 /RYER OFICT1ON , -1 - - ---- T 1 4- I� FL 5L 0855' 23 N 22 N DLDB. SETBACK 21 N 20 N Iq N 18 N I1 N 16 N 11551 15 N -I— -- — -- - ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 200 ft. BALDWIN AVENUE SINTO AVENUE BOONE AVENUE la MAXWELL AVENUE 11 )G EUCLID AVENUE GATALPO AVENUE IN HIGHWAY NO 90 GRAPHIC SCALE MONTGOMERY 1 INDIANA AVENUE 800 rt SEWER LINE LIFT STATION 0 MINIMUM 554ER A5- BUILT REGVIRR'lE T'5 FOR COUNTY UTILMES SPOKANE weirt O 445) 5. STREET WIDTH/BACK TO BACK OF CURBS/WIDTH OF RI6HT -OF -WAY. 6. LOCATION OF SEWER MAIN WITHIN STREET. FORLE MAIN ANGLE POINTS SHALL BE LOCATED 2 WAYS HORIZONTALLY AND ONE WAY VERTICALLY FROM PERMANENT SURFACE FEATURES. 7. STUBS NOT 10' FROM SIDE LOTS LINES MUST BE MOVED OR 0 MAINTENANCE EASEMENT MUST BE PROVIDED OR A HOLD COUNTY HARMLESS A6RT MUST BE PROVIDED. 8. SHOW ALL SERVICED LOTS, LOT NR' R5, BLOCK NUMBE125 AND LOT LINES. 8 I. PIPE SIZE AND 1YPE/LBH6TH AND SLOPE BETWEEN MANHOLES. 2. AS -BUILT RIM AND INVERT ELEVATION AT EACH MANHOLE. 3. DISTANCE FROM DOWNSTREAM MANHOLE TO SIDE SB^ER SERVICE STUB ENDS. 90. OFFSET DISTANCE TO STUB END FROM SEWER MAIN OR BACK OF CURB (40T PROPER LINES). ALL ANGLE POINTS OR BENDS ON SIDE SERVICE LINE SHALL BE LOCATED WITH 2 HORIZONTAL SWINE, 11ES. 4. A5 -BUILT INVERT ELEVATION OF STUB AND CALCULATED DEPTH FORM ADJOINING CURB OR NATURAL GROUND. 9. SHOW DIMENSIONS AND INCLUDE A COPY OF THE RECORDED EASEMENT DOCUMENT FOR ALL MAIN LINE SANITARY 513-ER EASEMENTS 00' MINIMUM EACH SIDE OF PIPE), 10. INCLUDE COUNTY MANHOLE NUMBERS. 11. SHOW SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE AND QUARTER SECTION. 12. DRAWINGS SHALL BE MTLAR WITH INK OR AS OTHERWISE APPROVED AND sugwirrry37 WITHIN 30 DAYS OF SEWER SYSTEMS ACCEPTANCE. 4 9 q 16 - 14 _ TIE TO EXISTING SEWER SOUTH OF INTERSTATE 40 (EXPIRES: 9/23/94 i6 NOT TO SGALE PERMIT REQUIRED! NOTIFY THE PERMIT ENGINEER 456 - 3600 94 HRS. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AP EXISTING 21" A.C. HA F GONSOLID TED IRR. PIT. AT DEVEL PERS EXPE 20!) 2020 5=0.00 OP 8" (A00 GL150 HA '" DIA. PVC 5 10" DIA. T 301.490 L. NSTRUCT 16 DIA. PVC 5 L.F. 8" 0100 (SEE 5 CL150 HA T *5) MAIN ONSTRUCT 232.54 L.F. HER MAIN GT 233.50 ' G100 CLI5 EE SHEET *5) STRUCT Ile). HATER MAIN 0 L.F. 5=0.00 5 HOT TAP EXISTING 21" A.G. HATER MAIN 8'i GONSOLIDATF-D IRR. pls AT DEVELOPERS EXPENSE. 151 Ei15.5 N 013 Eile)h N . 0+25.04 OFFSET 6.5' LEFT 10' SANITARY SEWER AS REQUIRED. (SEE PETAI LS) INV. ELEV S64•3421"H 15c1.2 E/Ici.3 N 15q• 5 Ei1.� N Z 1+26.23 OFFSET 4c1.5' RIGHT PLUG /," SANITARY SEWER AS READ MARK Etc OF LINE 1"1/ 2X4" PLANK BURIED ON END (SEE DETAILS) INV. ELEV. = 2011.5? \-? 88.b N 51113 5." Gc100 GLI50 HATER MAIN 10' BEYOND PROJECT BOUNDARY CAP AS REOP. MARK H/ 2"X4" PLANK BURIED ON END. (SEE DETAILS) sE CURB AND GUTTER 10" DIA. PVC. SEWER AIN RIGHT OF HAY EXTEND ALL SIDE SEWER LINES 5' BEYOND RIGHT OF WAY LINE, 57.°1RA6E INSIDE LOTS (TYR SEE DETAILS) A REA 2" SERVICE TO STORAGE AREA END OF LINE BLOW OFF VALVE - HATER SERVICES AT SIDE LOT LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED EXTEND SERVICE 5' BEYOND RIGHT-OF-HAY LINE, INSIDE LOTS EDGE OF PAVING PLAT BOUNDARY 5/26/44 EXTEND 5" Gcl00 GLI MAIN 10' BEYOND PR BOUNDARY. CAP AS (SEE DETAILS) HORIZONTAL: 1" 50' VERTIGAL: 1"=5' EXTEND b" Gc100 CLI50 HATER MAIN 10' BEYOND PROJECT BOUNDARY GAP AS REGD. MARK VI/ 2"X4" PLANK BURIED ON END (SEE DETAILS) CLEVIOUT 0 PERMIT REQUIRED! NOTIFY THE PERMIT ENGINEER 456-3600 24 HRS. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SGALE: 1 INGH = 50 FEET LESEND THRUST BLOCK GATE VALVE D FIRE HYDRANT HATER SERVICE DRYHELL >---- SEWER SERVICE 0 HATER GT QUIREP. 1. • • , 1"1 1' 1 1 8 W /CAP ZO.5 8/ 1 8$.' E /16.2 .0E/ STUB 8" SEWER WAIN re) souTth my. ELEV c 2425.81 PROJECT BOUNDARY 5 E W EA! EXTENSION ' To BE c1aN5TRUcrav AND ,SR ast! AS A MAT OF FINS AD01710111 1 FActor Es, BLOT ro SERVE FUTtlar. D##$54 EXTEND 8" WATER MAIN 10' BEYOND PROJECT BOUNDARY, CAP AND MARK END OF LINE 14/2" X 4" PLANK BURIED ON END (SEE DETAILS FOR MARKING REQUIREMENTS). PERMIT REQUIRED! NOTIFY THE PERMIT ENGINEER 456- 3600 24 HRS. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION HORIZONTAL: 1"=50' VERTICAL: I " =5' 4 0 +00.00 KLAMATH RIVER AVE 14 +60.80 CLARK FORK 5T 188.a F / 1 8•4 N I903 E/I8.1 N • O 0L150 1- MAIN. SHEET 0 189.3 E/18.4 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5 =0.004 32b.75' KLAMATH exi 5 TIN6 Ar "OP 8" 0900 SGALE : 1 INCH _ 50 FEET - +05 Ao 1,4p RI OFFS 5.00 O +0 ALLEGHENY AVE = 11+�6.OI GLARK FORK 5T ALLESHE 138.00' 0 +00 1+00 RIGHT OF WAY Y PTV ='�lU t 4q,ggt 30.00 / +35. END WATER Lin PLUG AS REQUIRED 8" GQOO GLI5O • TER MAIN. (5: E SHEET #3) 1 +35.00 OFFSET 5' RIGHT PLUS b" P.V.C. SEWER MAIN AS REQUIRED INV. ELEV = 2A24.Iq 4. 0 to ( 0 . PERMIT REQUIRED! Q NOTIFY THE PERMIT ENGINEER 456 - 3600 24 HRS. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION N.-- 1 +35.00 OFFSET 5' RIGHT PLUG 8" P.V.G. SEWER MAIN - _ AS REQUIRED ; .,y INV. ELEV =2024.Iq PROJEGT BOUNDARY EXPIRES: 9/23/94 PROFILE SGALE: LESEND I> THRUST BLOCK GATE VALVE p FIRE HYDRANT WATER SERVICE y.. SEWER SERVICE ZZ z 2035 2030 .TUB FUTURE 8" CT Ig5.28 P.V.G. SE TOP 8" GgOG CLI50 KATE L.F. 8 INCH D A. R MAIN CONSTRUCT P.V 328.06 L.F. G. SEWER MA 328.06' INCH DIA. N 8" Ggoo G L150 WATER MA IN (SEE SHEET 1#2) EXTEND 8" Cg00 GLI50 WATER MAltr 10' BEYOND PROJECT BOUNDARY CAP AS REQUIRED CONSTRUCT 208.5q' L.F. 8 DIA. P.V.G. SEWER MAIN 208.5q' PROF I LE SCALE: SCALE 1 INCH = 50 FEET / �� S� T $ My 13+00 PROJECT BOUNDARY 14 +65.54 BEGIN ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ERECT TEMPORARY BARRIER (SEE DETAIL) STUB FUTURE 8" PVC WATER MAINS IO' BEYOND MANHOLE PLUG AS REGD. 14 +00 \e FJ . ,o / /. MANjiOLE MIN. 4' Iq 50 E /18.2N / 14' WIDE GRADED GRAVELLED TEMPORARY A( ".E55 TO MANHOLE 15 +00 3 M FACE OF CURB INSTALL FLUSH POINT ^ 3 e 16 +00 '1 11+00 y 6 SANITARY SEWER 6 18 +00 4 d Iq +00 3 -WATER • RVICES AT SIDE L.T LINES UNLESS 0 RWISE NOTED. 511)5 SERVICE 5' ;EYOND RIGHT OF WAY LINE INSIDE LOTS COLORADO RIVER STR d 20 +00 I � GONSTRUGT 624.24 400 GLI50 WATER PAIN ND ALL. SIDE SEWER INES 5' B ' OND RIGHT OF WAY INE INSID OTS (TYP. SEE DET ILS) T 20+13.13 COLORADO RIVER ST = 10 +06.02 VILLA AVENUE - PROJECT BOUNDARY APPROVED FOR SP • E COUNRUTTIES BY • CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQUIRED! NOTIFY THE PERMIT ENGINEER 456 - 3600 24 HRS. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION THRUST BLOCK 0 SATE VALVE j� FIRE HYDRANT .- WATER SERVICE ORYNELL SEWER SERVICE SHAPED MORTAR FIL LET SERVICE TEE Ty pE W TERMINATE AS SPECIFIED BY BY COUNTY UTILITIES ENGINEER. 6" PEEP (MAX OWNER INSTALLED SIPE SEWER. SEE MANHOLE ADAPTER U SERVICE TEE P "gi 22 BEND 1 EXTEND CONNECTIONS 5' BEYOND TO THE PROPERTY LINE INSIDE LOTS. 2. INSTALL PIPE ZONE MATERIAL (BEDDING) PER SPECIFICATIONS. 3. ALL CONNECTIONS SHALL. BE TYPE "A" UNLESS NOTED. 4. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE RECORD DRAWINGS LOCATIONS WITH TWO (2) HORIZONTAL TIES AND ONE (I) VERTICAL TIE TO STUB OR SEWER LINE AND STATION 40' OFFSET DISTANCE TO STUB , DEPTH OF STUB, AND INVERT ELEVATION OF STUB. ANY HORIZ. ANGLE POINTS ON SERVICE LICE NEED TO BE AS -BUILT WITH 2 HORIZ. CROSS TIES TO PERMANENT SURFACE FEATURES. 5. INCLUDE STATION AND DIRECTION OF NEAREST MANHOLE 6. RECORD DRAWING SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE. I. THE SHELF AND CHANNEL SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH FINISH 2. CONSTRUCT SHELF TO THE GROWN LINE OF THE PIPE. SERVICE TEE EXISTING GROUND 2" x 4" BOARD SET AT INVERT OF STUB WITH 18" LENGTH OF I/2" REBAR SECURED TO THE TOP PORTION OF BOARD 4 SET AT A MAX. OF 6" BELOW EXIST GROUND. MATCH * THE MINIMUM SLOPE MAY BE REDUCED TO I% IF A SURVEYORS LEVEL 15 USED. .u0u RING 3" MAX. I. MANHOLES TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO M -I'1 (ASTM C 418) UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON PLANS OR NOTED IN THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSPOT SEC. 6 -023. 2. ALL REINFORCED CAST IN PLAGE CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS A. NON - REINFORCED CONCRETE IN CHANNEL AND SHELF SHALL BE GLASS G. ALL PRECAST CONCRETE SHALL. BE GLASS AX. 3. PRECAST BASES SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH CUTOUTS OR KNOCKOUTS. KNOCKOUTS SHALL HAVE A WALL THICKNESS OF 2" MINIMUM. 4. KNOCKOUT OR CUTOUT HOLE SIZE 15 EQUAL TO PIPE OUTER DIAMETER PLUS MANHOLE WALL THICKNESS. MAXIMUM PIPE SIZE 15 21" FOR 48" MANHOLE. (MAX. PIPE SIZE MAY BE LIMITED BY PIPE CONFIGURATION) MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN HOLE 15 8 ". 5. ALL BASE REINFORCING SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH OF 60,000 P51 AND BE PLACED IN THE UPPER HALF OF THE BASE WITH 1" MINIMUM CLEARANCE. b. NO STEPS SHALL BE PLACED IF THE DEPTH FROM THE TOP OF THE MANHOLE TO THE TOP OF THE BASE SLAB 15 LESS THAN 15 FEET. 1. NO STEPS SHALL BE PLACED IN THE ADJUSTMENT SECTION. 8. THE MANHOLE OPENING SHALL BE ORIENTED DIRECTLY OVER THE INVERT OF THE LARGEST INLET PIPE. MANHOLE PIPE ADAPTERS AND GASKETS MAY VARY IN SHAPE AND SIZE AS ILLUSTRATED IN ABOVE DETAIL BY ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.S.T.M. 6 MANHOLE WALL OPENING SHALL BE CAST AT THE FACTORY OR CORE DRILLED PIPE (TYP.) GASKET (TYPICAL) MANHOLE ADAPTER (TYP) 11/2 TIMES NORINAL PIPE DIAMETER--- - OR IS ". WHICHEVER 15 GREATER CONCRETE MANHOLE CONNECTION STANDARD MANHQLE ADAPTER AND STUB -OUT GONEGT ION MORTAR 6" MIN. MANHOLE TYPE 1-48•D REINFORCING STEEL (FOR SEPARATE BASE ONLY) SECTION A -A . "-- - 0.23 SG.. IN/FT. IN EACH DIRECTION FOR 48" DIA. GASKET PRECAST RISER SECTION 6ASKETED PRECAST GONE ECCENTRIC UNLESS 11 - 'OTHERWISE SPECIFIED STEPS (SEE NOTE $b) THE CENTER OF THE MANHOLE 15 TO BE A MINIMUM OF 4' FROM EDGE OF PAVING. ADJUSTMENT SECTIOWCONGRETE BRICK OR CONCRETE GRADE RINGS NONSHRINK WATERPROOF GROUT BETWEEN ALL RINGS 4 FRAME. STRIKE OFF EXCESS MORTAR, SMOOTH ON INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF ADJUSTMENT SECTION. CONSTRUCT IN FIELD CHANNEL 4 SHELF TO THE GROWN OF THE PIPE. REINFORCING STEEL (FOR PRECAST BASE WITH INTEGRAL RISER) 0.15 SQ. IN./FT. IN EACH DIRECTION FOR 48" DIA. GRAVEL BAGKFILL FOR PIPE BEDDING. 6" MIN. COMPAGTF-D DEPTH FOR PRECAST BASE. \-- SEPARATE CAST IN PLACE OR SEPARATE PRECAST BASE REINFORCING STEEL (FOR SERATATE BASE ONLY) 0.23 SQ.. IN/FT. IN EACH DIRECTION FOR 48" DIA. • A GA5T ( r +" R 4 (FOR GLEANOUT) 6" MIN. 8" 4" MIN. 6" MIN.- SECTION B-B 0000000000000 ° 000 ° 000 oho A A A AAA ononof 6" MIN SECTION G-G 15" � � 12 u 3 COVER ASSY. SPACED - 3 4" HEIGHT 14s" w ❑ ❑ w 11 `III• PIPE MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED. SANITARY "WYE" 8" GLEAN -OUT FROM SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SHEET U -13 LIMITS OF PIPE COMPACTION LEGEND: NATURAL GROUND RAVEL BAGKFILL OR FOUNDATIONS pEsI6N M$ WHEN SPECIFIED. (FOR P.V.G. AND P.E. INSTALLATION) GRAVEL FOR PIPE BEDDING METHOD B OR C COMPACTION BAGKFILL MATERIAL PLACED IN 0.5" LOOSE LAYERS AND COMPACTION TO Q5% MAXIMUM DENSITY FROM OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER. COUNTY OF SPOKANE SHEET 5 -11 FINISHED GRADE 8" MIN. L__ MIN. 12" N ADJUST. SECTION FIBER JOINT PACKING OR EQUAL. 1/8 BEND PLUS TO BE SEALED IN SAME MANNER AS MAIN SEWER JOINTS. 0.15 O.D. MIN. x 0.80" COMPACTION AND BAGKF ILL GAST RING COVER 4" MIN. A.S.T.M. A48 C.L. 40 GRAY IRON UNDISTURBED EARTH SOIL BASE PROPERTY LINE SEWER SIDE SERVICE SENOR 5I DE SERVICE LOCATION I / 26 3/4" - 34 1 /8" SECTION A -A PERMIT REQUIRED! NOTIFY THE PERMIT ENGINEER 456 - 3600 24 HRS. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION FINISHED ROADWAY SURFACE (PAVEMENT) EQUAL (10' MIN.) ROADWAY SUBGRADE SEWER LINE - ' INSTALL STRAIGHT TEE AS SHOWN WITH GAP AT R.O.W. TO ACT AS A SMALL SUMP FOR CLEANING PURPOSES AT END OF CONSTRUCTION. INSTALL 6ASKETED GAP OR SCREW GAP AS SHOWN GLEAN -OUT STANDPIPE WILL BE USED AT END OF CONSTRICTION TO GLEAN DRYLINE SEWER SYSTEM OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND EXCESS WATER. (STANDPIPE, CAPS, AND TEE WILL BE REMOVED WHEN SEWER LINE 15 EXTENDED) SANITARY SEWER DRYLINE PROPERTY LINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE SEWER LINE NOTE: ALL SEWER SERVICES TO BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 10' FROM THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE AND SHALL EXTEND 5' PAST THE RIGHT OF WAY LINE INTO THE LOT. NON -SKID PAI ItRN TO BE CAST INTEGRAL ON TOP OF COVER NOTE - GAPPED TOP OF GLEAN -OUT STANDPIPE SHALL BE SHOWN ON AS -BUILT DRAWINGS WITH (2) HORIZONTAL AND (1) VERTICAL GROSS TIES TO PERMENENT SURFACE FEATURES. EQUAL (10' MIN.) SECTION B-B FROM SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC. WORKS SHEET U -14 EQUAL EXISTING R.O.W. LINE (OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER) (DOWNSTREAM) FROM SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Affinnuranur nu 26 3/16" — - 2 1/8" 2 I/t NO THE I SANIT, r- 2. MANHOLI WITH STA. REQUIREI '. 3. MATINS ROCKING MANHOLE RINS AND GOVT SEWER SIDE. SERVICE +ND CO .PECIFIC FEDER EXTEND IN FUTURE TO COUNTRY SEWER MANHOLE DOWNSTREAM END OF DRYLINE SEWER SYSTEM SEE NOTES TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION GLEAN -OUT A.S.T.M. 5536 C.L. 80 -55 -06 DIGTILE IRON =R SKID DESIGN DETAIL ;TRAY BE EMOSSED ON EACH TOLE CC :11TH 3/16" RAISED LEI 1E125. HALL BE IN ACCORDANCE AND MEET THE STRENGTH FIGATION RR - F - 621D. SHALL : , LED TO ASSURE NON - \NY CO 1TION. EXPIRES: 9/23/94 S1-EET TAPPED MECH. J.T. END GAP CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK WITH 4" PVC SLEEVE NOTE: SADDLE MAY BE INSTALLED RATHER THAN USING TAPPED 1 N12 GAP. O SCAL T MAINLINE PIPE 36" BASE 2" MUEL. MARK c. STOP 4 Wry_. /8" G.I. VALVE BOX TOP WITH LID FROM CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT NO. 19 STANDARD DRAWING FINISHED ROAD GRADE 1�4TER MARKE DET 1 L "GAP (LOOSE) 6" - 3" -PORT M.H. FIRE HYDRANT WITH DUE -LU6 GLAND MEGA -LUG GLAND ME6A -1.116 GLAND 3 CU. FEET DRAIN ROCK ...____ 7' TYPICAL �4��` .� h GRASSY SWALE v' Fe* WWW*VI'VIVI'r V '/%4# W\ A /*< \ *tetfr /. . t o*, . /S/\/* \' FNp VIFI:1 12" x 12" x 14" CONCRETE PAD 6" DUCT IRON PIPE CL 50 TYPICAL FIRE HYQRANT 11'ING FROM CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT #I4 DRAWING NUMBER H-4 NOTi;t 1. ALL PIPEING TO BE SALVANIZE-D IRIQN PIPE. 2. SINGLE SERVICE LINE ALL I" PIPING AND FITTINGS. 3. 200 #I PS." P.E. MAY BE USED FOR PIPE RUN - 6ALV. FOR STUB LINES PLAN VIA 1 1/2" GAVANIZED IRON.PIPE ELEVATION HATER SERVI GE I7ETA I L FROM CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT #Iq NOTES: L HYDRANT SHALL BE TRAFFIC MODEL. 2. ALL VALVES SHALL OPEN COUNTER - CLOCKWISE 3. HYDRANT BRAND MUST BE APPROVED BY G.I.D. 4. ANY DEVIATIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY G.I.D. 5. CONC. BLOCKING REQUIRED IF MORE THAN ONE SECTION OF PIPE USED. 6" FLG x M.H. RS6V WITH MEGA -LUG ELAND 2" OPER. NUT I/2 "xII /2 "xI 1/2 "TEE 2'-0" -PROPERTY LINE 1 1N B O TH SIDt5 CURB AND GUTTER CAST IRON VALVE BOX b" 0900 CL 150 WATER MAIN M.H. x M.H. x FLO. TEE OR TAP.' SLEEVE (55) 5' MIN. 12" N. 3" M WATER MAIN I it 11 1 F— ROAD PL„g�i // EAST -{SST STREETS FINISH GRADE -ROAD P W MAIN TYPICAL SECTION 12" I3AGKFILL CHARACTERISTICS NO ROCKS LARGER _ THAN 4" DIAMETER NO ROCKS LARGER THAN 4" DIAMLItR BEDDING - GLEAN, ROUND, _ GRANULAR SAND OR GRAVEL 3/4" MINUS OR SMALLER HATER MAIN TRENCH I7ETA I L FROM CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT #1c1 A I? VAGUUM R EEL l EE STAT I ON FROM CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTRICT NO. 11 STANDARD DRAWING .PLAN / NOR • 501TTH STREETS A. I EA. G.I. DOUBLE STRAP SADDLE TAPPED I" B. 1 EA. BRONZED CORP. STOP, MALE I.P. X G. 6 EA. I" GALVANIZED 90° ELLS D. I EA. I" X VARIABLE LENGTH GALVANIZED E. F. e. K. B WATER MAIN RIGHT OF WAY T i APPROVED FOR SPOKA r COU , UTILITIES BY: DA - 9' CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQUIRED! NOTIFY THE PERMIT ENGINEER 456 - 3600 24 HRS. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TER MAIN I EA. I° MUELLER "ORISEAL" STOP 4 WASTE 2 EA. I" X 6" GALVANIZED PIPE NIPPLE I EA. I" AIR VACUUM RELIEF VALVE, "APGO' H. I EA. I" X Ib0° BEND GALVANIZED I. I EA. I" BEEHIVE STRAINER J. I EA. 4" X 4" X 6' GUARD 4 MARKER POST PAINTED ORANGE AND SET APPROX. 2' IN GROUND. A V R 5 PAINTED BLACK 4' DIA. X 5" WALL PRECAST MANHOLE - FLAT TOP FOR HIGHWAY TRAFFIC, 24" MANHOLE FRAME 4 COVER WITH CONCRETE LEVELING RINGS IF REQUIRED, 4' DEEP L. WASHED GRUC.I1tW ROCK, 100% MAX. I I/2 ", 5% THROUGH I /4" SCREEN, 6" DEEP M. 2 EA. I" X 10° GALVANIZED ELBOW EXPIRES: 9/23/94 • w16ta ariii411 " ti l ': 1 r► I !,1 1• Iti 4 r.1 � r1 tc , • • I' ' I • . w l,„..,.,,: . ..... in! • • ��� EXISTING FENCE SHOULDER 8' —' PROPOSED WIDENING — II' -• BALLAST OR NATURAL GROUND EXISTING LANE 14' EXISTING WIDTH 26' t — 2.07. EXISTING SHOULDER x -- 4' "'1 1 A A / � % / > i / /\ / /' � /1 . / � \\ ASPHA CONGREE PAVEMENT GSBG '1 P! C AI_ RAM' SECTION h90 EAST BOUND OFF-RAP 8'X 5O' TAPER LANE EXISTING FO6 LINE 10+00.00 1-qo OFF -RAMP 10+00.00 BARKr�R ROAD F.S. = 2O44.Ig STA 10 +22 OFFSET 1.61' ES 1 -q0 OFF RAMP 533 T (TRUCK PERCENT) P.M. PEAK HOLR PHV (I1 BuII-POUT YEAR) 51145 'PENCE 11+4 1.00 BEGIN GORE STRIPE 18" STOP BAR STOP SIGN - , DESIGN DATA I -GO EAST BOUND I 1 -EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKING EX'STING EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXISTING FENCE 1 4M •7 KM iil IM•ir9thm7,% } ? • !. -4 WNR> 91:4 r• sfry ststfoPd RtMAM►tA4MAwisIV IME 71 A tt'Wf.•• O +wSIi/S WOMUMAletOsi•Ykro/M•r • t• ..WN+dlilVidei~W10MOyMArtglf 111M�111�1f a3• ■ •+mt FUNCTIONAL GLASS DESIGN GLASS ACCESS CONTROL LEWD USE TERRAIN DESIGN VEHICLE APT K (516 ADT FOR DHV) D (PIRfGT1ONAL SPLIT) EAST BOUND 1 -q0 OFF RAMP INTERSTATE 1 -I FULL RJRAL ROLLING 13 3,q (RAMP) 10% N/A 5% 68 35 ES I- ON RAMP • NOTES: — FILL SLOPE TO BE 611 OR FLATTER ON NEW SECTION — 125' STORAGE POCKET — DEPTH OF BASE AND BALLAST TO CONFORM TO W.SD.O.T. RECOMMENDATIONS — INSTALL 18" THERMALPLASTIG STOP BAR —• ALL TRAFFIC ARROWS SHALL BE THERMALPLASTIG OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE PAINTED. BARKER ROAD COUNTY ARTERIAL N/A NONE RURAL ROL' :N6 SU q/OO "1% SOUTHBOUND 41% NORT 'BOUND 53% XISTING SIGNS a XISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT LEGEND EXISTING STOP 516N LS, -- EXISTING MONUMENT BOX 7x— EXISTING STREET LIGHT 0 — SIGN POST — EXISTING TOP GRATE, DRAINAGE INLET OO — EXISTING DRAINAGE OUTLET --- PROPOSED RAMP SPOKANE RIVER (NO SCALE) 0 u- INDIANA AVE. BAL Dn!N AVE. AUGUSTA AVE. > MISSION AVE.! rj 21 ^, 1 11 iii PROJECT SITE Lu lc Q r C) V I G N I T1' MAP ,-- I - E.B. OFF RAMP MP 2g3•gb £Q iBES: 9/23/05 END EXISTING GURt3 AND GUTTER END EXIST:N6 SUARDR.A11..-\ GRAPHIC SCALE • _ ( i''s: FEET 1 inch = 60 EXiSTINS 516 EXISTING FOG LINE • 8' X 50' TAPER LANE r • I I �i d ( RECEIVED JUN 29 1995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINE & e0 0 30 60 12.0 240 1 1 1 I ►,*++ _ 1771".7:" x J Wrm cr.7r[^a v'�� I mr"..� - + .+� • •••••••!:•• 1. ♦ ' 2� � 1. C F ' U z Q 1 a 1 O 1 4 I f A I - I •. :l r ' 0 • - 1 CD . 1 t. m • A .. ... r.». p.• rnf •T'►rrM7w 'r�w+"�+.!ti..r ww - nti ATE ,ASR ' , - �,w �r�.i`r,= - 1.�{�•,.1.�1' t.r •wr - W �+.+..�.r�i..:.r.. iyi. �Y. • wir y 4�L�1�. � ' " _ -- - _:{r .• .. ' b.rJ.er..r `N•( ■rf\QA2 em�w c WeoZ10 i .7\0L\ n4, • 4 ., • I• • ' • us 1 DEDICATION. KNOW BY ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT JAMES F. ETTER AND BILLIE A. ETTER, HUSBAND AND WIFE AND GLORIA D. HEDLUND, A WIDOW, HAVE CAUSED TO BE PLATTED INTO LOTS, BLOCKS AND STREETS, THE LAND SHOWN HEREON, TO BE KNOWN AS RIVERWAY VILLA FIRST ADDITION, BEING A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; A PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST, W.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE NORTH 00'35'03" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 888.91 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89'23'06" EAST 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING MARKED BY A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 89'23'06" EAST 370.30 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 89'56'51" PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 42'29'21" PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 59'59'58" PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 30'00'02" PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 59'59'58" PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 26'49'17" PLASTIC CAP; I VE R WA Y 29'56'26" EAST 215.95 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 00'00'04" WEST 455.00 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 89'54'16" EAST 103.63 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 00'00'02" WEST 36.41 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 89'56'51" EAST 120.00 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 00'00'02" EAST 195.00 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 89'56'51" EAST 30.00 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH 00'00'02" EAST 180.42 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH E'i_BAR WITH EAST 215.00 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH EAST 89.99 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH EAST 182.52 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH EAST 25.00 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH WEST 102.02 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH WEST 53.52 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH THENCE NORTH 49'06'28" EAST 135.43 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG A NON- TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET, CONCAVED NORTHEASTERLY WITH A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH' 38'58'29" WEST, AN ARC LENGTH OF 40.16 FEET, AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03'50'06" TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 52'56'34" EAST 150.00 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 27'41'51" WEST 146.37 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 22'40'02" WEST 148.55 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; . THENCE NORTH 29'59'58" WEST 282.98 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 60'00'02" WEST 616.86 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY OF RADIUS 265.00 FEET THROUGH AN ARC LENGTH OF 135.91 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2923'04" TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 89'23'06" WEST 370.27 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BARKER ROAD; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BARKER ROAD SOUTH 00'35'03" EAST 70.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; VILLA FIRS T A PORTION OFT E SW 1/4, SPC <A \E CC FINAL PLAT OF SECTION 8, LINTY, WAS T 25 N, R 45 E, W.M., INGTLN AND THEY DO HEREBY DEDICATE TO PUBLIC USE FOREVER THE STREETS AND ROADS SHOWN WITHIN THIS PLAT. BLOCK 1, LOT 11; BLOCK 2, LOT 3; BLOCK 3, LOT 5; BLOCK 5, LOT 9; BLOCK 6, LOT 5. BEING ONE -FOOT (1') WIDE STRIPS AS SHOWN HEREON, ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO SPOKANE COUNTY AS GENERAL COUNTY PROPERTY, TO BE DEDICATED FOR ROAD PURPOSES, AT SUCH TIME AS THE ROAD IS CONTINUED AS FULL WIDTH RIGHT OF WAY, OR UNTIL ADJACENT LANDS ARE PLATTED. NO MORE THAN ONE (1) DWELLING STRUCTURE SHALL BE PLACED ON ANY ONE LOT; NOR SHALL ANY LOT BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING ADDITIONAL LOTS, OWNERSHIP OR BUILDING SITES WITHOUT FIRST FILING AND RECEIVING APPROVAL OF REPLAT. SIDE YARD AND REAR YARD SETBACKS SHALL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUESTED. THE SETBACKS INDICATED ON THIS SUBDIVISION MAY BE VARIED FROM IF PROPER ZONING APPROVALS ARE OBTAINED. USE OF PRIVATE WELLS AND WATER SYSTEMS IS PROHIBITED. THE PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM, PURSUANT THE WATER PLAN APPROVAL BY COUNTY AND STATE HEALTH AUTHORITIES, THE LOCAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT, AND WATER PURVEYOR, SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, AND THE SUBDIVIDER /SPONSOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR INDIVIDUAL DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE AS WELL AS FIRE PROTECTION TO EACH LOT /TRACT PRIOR TO SALE OF EACH LOT AND PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT • FOR EACH LOT. THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) IN INTEREST AGREE TO JOIN IN ANY COUNTY - APPROVED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND PAY SUCH RATES AND CHARGE AS MAY BE FIXED THROUGH PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR SERVICES OR BENEFIT OBTAINING BY THE PLANNING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTING, MAINTAINING OR OPERATION OF STORMWATER CONTROL FACILITIES. THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) IN INTEREST AGREE TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY TO PLACE THEIR NAME(S) ON PETITION FOR THE FORMATION OF A ULID BY PETITION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW 36.94, WHICH THE PETITION INCLUDES THE OWNER(S) PROPERTY; AND FURTHER NOT TO OBJECT BY THE SIGNING OF A PROTEST PETITION AGAINST THE FORMATION OF A ULID BY RESOLUTION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW CHAPTER 36.94 WHICH INCLUDES THE OWNER(S) PROPERTY. PROVIDED THIS CONDITION SHALL NOT PROHIBIT THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) FORM OBJECTING TO ANY ASSESSMENT(S) ON THE PROPERTY AS A RESULT OF IMPROVEMENT CALLED FOR IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FORMATION OF A ULID BY EITHER PETITION OR RESOLUTION METHOD UNDER RCW CHAPTER 36.94. EACH NEW DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE DOUBLE- PLUMBED FOR CONNECTION TO FUTURE AREAWIDE COLLECTION SYSTEMS. SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC APPLICATION APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF PERMITS BY THE HEALTH OFFICER, THE USE OF INDIVIDUAL ON -SITE SEWERAGE SYSTEM(S) MAY BE AUTHORIZED. NOTE: SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE AFORESAID OWNERS HAVING HEREUNTO SET THEIR HANDS THIS DAY OF , 1994. JAMES F. ETTER BILLIE A. ETTER GLORIA D. HEDLUND STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SPOKANE ON THIS ___ DAY OF __ , 19__, BEFORE ME PERSONALLY APPEARED JAMES F. ETTER AND BILLIE A. ETTER, HUSBAND AND WIFE KNOWN TO BE THE INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED IN AND WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THEY SIGNED SAME AS THEIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR LAST ABOVE WRITTEN. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING IN SPOKANE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SPOKANE ON THIS ____ DAY OF • _, 19�._, BEFORE ME PERSONALLY APPEARED GLORIA D. HEDLUND, A WIDOW, KNOWN TO BE THE INDIVIDUAL DESCRIBED IN AND WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT SHE SIGNED SAME AS HER FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR LAST ABOVE WRITTEN. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING IN SPOKANE ADDITIO SURVEYOR'S _CERTIFICATE THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. DAVID E. SCHUMANN, RLS #22121 SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DIRECTOR, SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES -^ SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 19__. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT EXAMINED_ AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 19 . DIRECTOR; SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT EXAMINED ;.ND APPROVED THIS FOR SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS SPOKANE. COUNTY ASSESSOR BY DEPUTY SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHAIRPERSON, SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER BY DEPUTY FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF , 19 AT M. IN BOOK OF PLAT AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF DEPUTY DAY OF -, 19__ _. DAY OF 19_- DAY OF 19 . EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 19___ AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL TAXES WHICH HAVE BEEN LEVIED AND BECOME CHARGEABLE AGAINST THE LAND SHOWN WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION HAVE BEEN FULLY PAID THIS DAY OF , 19. RECEIVED JUL 0 1 1cm4 SPOKANE COUITTt ' r . RECEIVE® JUR s1994 County Enginnerin; 06/30/94 +E.uR.vw6 4200 West Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 Phone: (208) 667 -1171 Fax: (208) 664 -3507 North Idaho Engineering S HEET 7 2 HEETS AUGUSTA 30.00' BALDWIN 8 O N89°23'06'E 30.03' 0 0 60.00' 30,00' icq oe oe W Pq RIVER WAY FD. RE -STEEL PIN AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #4337 FOR W 1/4 CORNER #8109180257 (NOT A PART) FD, 1/2 INCH REBAR \J /SURCAP MARKED 'WELBORN PLS 15043 S 89'23'06' W 369,87' (M) S 89 °59'11' E (R2) 370.00' (R2) S 8973'06' W 370,27' S89 °23'06'W 400.29' -BLOCK 1, LOT 11 1' WIDE STRIP 370.30' N 89 °56'50' W (M) 2615,78' (M) S 89 °56'44" E 2615.78' (REC.) N —FD. SPOKANE COUNTY BRASS CAP AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #2455 S89 °23'06'V 0.40' 0 0 1 0 0 0 :1 C1 C9 L= 1 07710 • 0 o � . 9,122 SF 1'4 oo � � r 560 �16!?i G. �s 7,585 SF „ � s ' • O oh 5 U in h d-) ' 1n 0 o; �O 103.63' • o cisin 6736 SF 89'54'16'E; 103.63' 11 6 " ^ in 0 0 6,736 SF •"+ kp S89'54'16'E 103.63' • 7 ¢° tri 0 N89'S4'16' 6,736 SF 103.63' • o 9 w ° 6,736 SF • N89'S4'16'W. S89 °54'16'E 103.63' S00 °00'02'W 36.41' o2 sio 00 vP P C13 . 2b' 9S' o N 1 '^ . 7,900 SF :S89•59'58'E e o cki 100.00' z° in CU 2 1- 'O : 6,521 S, W t LA • g: loo.00' cu r' 1 y 3 % d tn Y N ..° 6,521 SF p co • pti • v9 •. 100,00' • `r l . 4. N89'59'58'W � 4 N ew • 6,431 SF j ICJ Q • • , . 0 20 U C14 80.02' 25' S89 °56'51'E N of O 125.00' o U1 15 49.98' ti - BLOCK 3, LOT 5 .was. 1' WIDE STRIP S89 °56'51'E N 1r? ,D n 6,741 SF 189 '' :4 70,00' w CU z 25' * 1 2 In :6,737 SF 45 e - -- _ S . • 50.02' S89•56'51'E 120,00' (- BLOCK 2, LOT 3 1' WIDE STRIP 30.00' tri MISSION AVENUE A PCRTICN EF T TRACT 'A' L42 AC S89'56'S1'E 215.00' ALLEGHENY AVENUE VILLA SP C35 9,714 SF c6° - 2 9 ,136 SF S89'54'16'E: 10 6,736 SF TRACT 'B' 26,540 SF UNPLATTED SW <AN BLOCK 5, LOT 9 1' WIDE STRIP O" %'?" 9,067 SF � , /• 12 �K N26049'17'14 .53,52' `� /V591O 9 -t S9,S8. 18 (3' 8 FINAL PLAT 1/4, F C L 8 "c, ✓, 8,707 SF Orr R 37' li- �- N30 °00'02'E 25.00' F UNTY, WASHINGT SECTICI\ 8, T 25 N, R 45 E, W 7 - FD. SPOKANE COUNTY BRASS CAP WITH X ON CENTERLINE OF MISSION AVENUE AS INDICATED ON SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #2454 FOR S 1/4 CORNER F S T BLOCK 6, LOT 5 1' WIDE STRIP v (Ri) (R2) (R3) (R4) 1, SURVEYOR'S NOTES THE RECORD INFORMATION ON THIS MAP WAS TAKEN FROM SPOKANE COUNTY RECORDS AS FOLLOWS: RECORD LABEL BOOKS OF SURVEYS: BOOK 27, PAGE 42 BOOK 25, PAGE 83 BOOK 9, PAGE 79 BOOK 50, PAGE 27 AND SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORDS: #4337 #2455 #2454 BLOCKS 1 THROUGH 6 CONTAIN 12.73 ACRES INCLUDING ROAD RIGHT OF WAY, • CURVE J RADIUS Cl 300.00' C2 300.00'_ C3 225.00 84,46' C4_ 225,00' 33.35 725 ' C5 .' 154,32' C6 725.00' 18.67' C7 625,00' 267.95' C8 2129,86' 481,71' C9.. -- _ . 20 00' .. 27,55' _ C1 20 00' 31.42' Cil 250,00' 47.53' - C12 .' 30.13' C13 .00' 26.12' .. C 20,00' 31.40' — C15 20 00 3143' C16 ,00' 31.40' C17 21 86 46.00'_ C18 00' 7 79' _C19 756.0 2 79' ._ . _ 020 ' 65,09' C21 750 750 00 00' 65_61 _ -1.1C- C22 _ 7 -- 45.' 23 _ - 600,00 21.04' C24 _ 65.76 025 600,00' _65.08' _CO26 _ 600.00' 65,19' _ -_ _ C27 650.00' 65.03' C28 650.00' ,' _ C29 650,00' 65 C30 650.00' 49.76 ___ __ C31_ 20.00' 33,66' C32 _ 20,00' 29.67' L.__ __ _, - _ _ C3 — _ 2104 .86' ,' C34 20.00' - - 60 31,42' C35 _ 00' _ 31.42 _ C36 _ 600 20 00' _ .16' C37 265.00' 135.91' r-- ADD ITIO GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100 ft LENGTH 1 TANGENT 130,69' _ 66.40' 23.17' 11.59' 42,73' 16.71'_ -- 77.45' - 9.34' _ 136.06' 241.89' 16.47' 20.00' 23.84' 18. - 8.75' - - BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS MAP IS THE WEST LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 8 TAKEN AS S 00 °35'03" E, TAKEN FROM R.O.S. FILED AT BOOK 27, PAGE 42, OF SURVEYS, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON. THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED USING A PENTAX PX1OD 10 SECOND THEODOLITE WITH ON BOARD ELECTRONIC DISTANCE METER. FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS WERE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WAC 332 - 130 -90 SECTION "C". 15.30' _ 19.98' 20,02' 19.98' 23.00' 3,90' 1.39' 32.57' 32.83' 22.74' -- -• 10.52'_ _ 32.91' 32.57' 32,63' 32.54' _ 32,54' 32.54' 24,89' 22.38' 18.32' 30.33' 20.00' 20,00' 20.09' - - 400 CHORD j 1 23.16' _ _ 33.32' 154.03' 265.90' 480,68' - 25.43' 28.28' -- 47.46' 27.36' _ 24,30' -- 28.27'-- ____ _ 28,30' _ _ 28.27' 46.00' 7,79' 2.79' 65,07' 65.59' 45.45' _ ` 21404' 65.73' 65.05' 65.15' _ 65.00' _ 65,00' 49.74' 29.82' 27.02' 60.66' 28.28' — 28.28' 40.15' 134.42' _ _ ACCURACY STATEMENT BEARING _i_ DELTA S76 __ _ 24 °57'35' - N62'12'46'E 04'5'29 _ N19°14'47•\,/ 21'30'23' SO4'14'47'E S23'54'06'E 08'29'37' 12 °11'44'_ S17 01'28'32' S28_•36'37'E _ _ 2_4 S69'20'48'W - 12'57'31' S69'27'58'E 7 N15'00'02'E _ 96•06/00•, _ S2_4'_33'li'E _ _ 10'53'34 S62'15'37'E 86'18'25' S37'25`Ol'W 74 N44 °58'25'W 89 °56'52' N_45_'01'35'E _ _ _ 90 S44'58'25'E _ S73'57'36'W _ _ 01•15'08' N29'40'5 29'40'S1'W N29 0012'47' N27'18'00'W 04'58'22' , N22 . _ 05'00'44'1 S18'03'S4'E 03'28'22' S17'20'00`E 02'00'341] S21 06'16'46' S27'43'30'E 601 1 S33'56'41'E 0613'29 S38•01'34'E 05'43'55' N32'17'39'1./ 05'43'55 N26 05'43'55' N21'30'12'W 04'23'09' N67 _ 96'25'2_3' N21'2 - 7 - '08 7 E - 84 N64 _ 01'39'04' N74 \.../ N15'00'02'E 90'00'00' 1 03 _ 29'23'04' N38'58'29'W S74'41'34'W • SET 1/2 INCH REBAR W/ RED CAP RLS #22121, OR AS NOTED 0 AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF ., 19 , AT M. IN BOOK ^_ OF PLAT AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF DEPUTY LEGEND SET 5/8 INCH REBAR W/ RED CAP RLS #22121, OR AS NOTED FD. MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED R nz FD. CONTROLLING SECTION CORNER DR 1/4 CORNER AS DESCRIBED 0 CALCULATED POINT - NOTHING SET B,S, BUILDING SETBACK , SET 5/8 INCH REBAR W/ 2 INCH ALUMINUM CAP MARKED RLS #22121 FOR CENTERLINE MONUMENT RECEIVED JUL 0 1 1994 BKANE COUNTY ENGINEER North Idaho Engineering 4200 West Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 838 14 Phone: (208) 667 -1171 Fax: (208) 664 -3507 RECEIVED 31,3R 0 (' 994_ County Minutia C:45/34 W44 \BE !E74AP2 SHEET 2 2 HEETS •-• DEDICATION THENCE DEPARTING THE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED CURVE ALONG A NON-TANGENT UNE NORTH 89'23'06" EAST 245.23 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 758.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE WHICH IS CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 109.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0815'34" .TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE DEPARTING THE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED CURVE ALONG A NON-TANGENT LINE SOUTH 295626" EAST 215.80 FF.±.1 TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 00'00'04' WEST 455.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 895416" EAST 103.63 FEET TO A 1/2 lIs.:CH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP THENCE SOUTH 00'00'02" WEST 201.39 FEET TO A 1/2 1!•IOH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE. WHICH IS CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.435FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9003'08" TO 'A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE DEPARTING THE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED CURVE *LNG A NON-TANGENT UNE SOUTH 000310" WEST 1q.o,:i FEET 7Q-4. POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY UNE C MISSION AVENUE tVHICH IS MARKED BY A 1/2 INCH REBAR Yr1il1 PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY SOUTH 895650" EAST 90.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE DEPARTING SAID RIGHT OF WAY EAST 10.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS, NON TANGENT CURVE WHICH IS CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.40 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8956'52" AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 4458'24" WEST 28.27 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 00'00'02" EAST 95.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR VAT1-1 PLAS11C CAP; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS 'CLIRVL WHICH IS CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY-. k•I ARC DISTANCE tiF'-3t.43',FEET THROUGH.A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90'03'08 TO A 1/2 REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE DEPARTING THE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED CURVE A.LOrG A NON-TANGENT UNE NORTH 0002'29" WEST 50.00 xj A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 8956'51* EAST REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 0000 EAST REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 8956'51" EAST REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 0000'02" EAST REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; TrIENCE SOUTH 8956'51" EAST REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 4229'21" EAST REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 5959'58' EAST REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 3000'02" EAST REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 5959'58" WEST REBAR 1N PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 2649'17" WEST REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 4906'28" EAST REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; 50.02 FEET TO A 1/2 INOH 195.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH 30.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH 180.42 FEET TO A 1/2 NCH 215.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH 89.99 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH 182.52 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH 25.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH 102.02 FEEI TO A 1/2 NCH 53.52 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH 185.43 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AND WELCO GROUP, INCORPORATED, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, HAS CAUSED TO BE PLATTED INTO LOTS, TRACTS AND S1REE.TS, THE LAND SHOWN HEREON, TO BE KNOWN HENCEFORTH AS THE RIVERWALK FIRS - ADDITION WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; 1.441/C. . A PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE *4 . " OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF SPOKANE. 5 ATE OF WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8; THEN NOR H 00'35'03" WEST 873.95 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH 89'24'57" EAST 30.00 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LI OF BARKER ROAD, MARKED BY A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP, THE TRU POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 8924 EAST 15.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS, NON- TANGENT CURVE WHICH IS CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 7.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2027'23" AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 0938'39" EAST 7.10 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLAS11C CAP; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 600.00 FOOT RADIUS, NON- TANGENT CURVE WHICH IS CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 40.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE: 03'50'06" AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS'NORTH WEST 40.15 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE DEPARTING THE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED CURVE ALONG' A NON-TANGENT LINE NORTH 525634" EAST 150.00 FEE11 A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; • THENCE NORTH 27'41'51" WEST 145.73 FEET TO A 1/2' INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; VE b ,: ("` (/ *: : ): ::: ; ;:\ ; Avi 01/4°645 ( frf.- Ndtp. _ G fR A Art LiiiLrhes EiTsemeAA Slope. Staewik-t_K Airpopti.1, vt5rom EASE-eve is (maw p c4 bouittioe-7 5tope-4- c; 1d-( ko HOIlke ackwee5, Li1 1, 14 (JP terieS Co" 5r,eileotee /2124109G-6- erI5eme-AJt Icovpie C '" ' 2c , s. gaAD DqPotiAtoe. Th(5, ofv 4pplies A PORTION OF T pic,,v5 Atvo stG.her Rom-le WALK FI BY ITS THENCE NORTH 2241'20" WEST 149.19 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR W111-1 PLAS11C CAP; 'THENCE NORTH 2959'58" WEST 290.98 FEEI TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 6000'02" WEST 508.04 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WIT-1 PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 672.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE WHICH IS CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.73 THROUGH A CEN NGLE OF 200555" AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS SOU 046' 6 WEST TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; 7a-o2-55 THENCE DEPARTING THE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED CURVE ALONG A NON-TANGENT UNE SOUTH 003405' EAST 16.81 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP. THENCE SOUTH 89'23'06" WEST ;;t1=8 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WHIC IS • • Iv " a" "II AD CONTAINING 13.26 ACRES MORE OR LESS. EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE FOR DRAINAGE, UTTUTIES, SIDEWALKS, SLOPE, AND SIGHT TRIANGLE EASEMENTS AS SPECIFIED. coRW,orke 49,op,c15 THE COMMON AREAS TRACTS "A" AND "B" SHOW1EITN THIS PLAT.ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE RIVERWAU< OWNERS ASSOCIATION. THE0MMON AREAS SHALL NOT BE SOLD OR TRANSFERRED, REGARDLESS OF ANY PROVISIONS IN THE COVENANTS TO THE CONTRARY WITHOUT EXPRESS APPROVAL BY SPOKANE COUNTY, AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED SUBSERVIENT ESTATES FOR-TAX PURPOSES TO THE OTHER LOTS•CREATED- HEREIN. TRACTS "c", D. E , "C, AND "H" ARE THIRTEEN FOOT (13') WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIPS AND TRACT "F" IS A FIVE FOOT (5') WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION. SPOKANE COUNTY IS HEREBY GRANTED THE RIGHT OF INGRESS INGRESSMD EGRESS TO ALL COMMON AREAS AND/OR DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. NO MORE THAN ONE (1) DWELUNG STRUCTURE SHALL BE PLACED ON ANY ONE LOT; NOR SHALL ANY LOT BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING ADDITIONAL :-... OTS, OWNERSHIP. OR BUILDING SITES WITHOUT FIRST FILING AND RECEIVING APPROVAL OF RE.?1_AT. SIDE YARD AND REAR YARD SETBACKS SHALL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUESTED. THE SE.WACKS INDICATED ON THIS SUBDI\ISION MAY BE VARIED FROM IF PROPER ZONING APPROVALS ARE OBTAINED. USE OF PRIVATE WELLS AND WATER SYSTEMS IS PROHIBITED. THE PUBUC WATER SYSTEM, PURSUANT THE WATER PLAN APPROVAL BY COUNTY AND STATE HEALTH AUTHORITIES, THE LOCAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT, AND WATER PURVEYOR, SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, AND THE SUBDIVIDER/SPONSOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR INDIVIDUAL DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE AS WELL AS FIRE PROTECTION TO EACH LOT/TRACT PRIOR TO SALE OF EACH LOT AND PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR EACH LOT. THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) IN INTEREST AGREE TO JOIN IN ANY COUNTY- APPROVED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND PAY SUCH RATES AND CHARGE AS MAY BE FIXED THROUGH PUBUC HEARINGS FOR SERVICES OR BENEFIT OBTAINING BY THE PLANNING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTING, MAINTAINING OR OPERATION OF STORMWATER CONTROL FACIUTTES. THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) IN INTEREST AGREE TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY TO PLACE THEIR NAME(S) ON PETITION FOR THE FORMATION OF UUD BY PETITION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW 36.94, WHICH THE PETITION INCLUDES THE OWNER(S) PROPERTY; AND FURTHER NOT TO OBJECT BY THE SIGNING OF A PROTEST PETITION AGAINST THE FORMATION OF UUD BY RESOLUTION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW CHAPTER 36.94 WHICH INCLUDES THE OWNER(S) PROPERTY. PROVIDED THIS CONDITION SHALL NOT PROHIBIT THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) FORM OBJECTING TO ANY ASSESSMENT(S) ON THE PROPERTY AS A RESULT OF IMPROVEMENT CALLED FOR IN CONJUNCTION V4TH THE FORMATION OF A UUD BY EITHER PETITION OR RESOLUTION METHOD UNDER RCW CHAPTER 36.94. A PUBUC SEWER SYSTEM WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR THE PLAT AND INDIVIDUAL SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED TO EACH LOT PRIOR TO SALE. USE OF INDIVIDUAL ON- SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS SHALL NOT BE AUTHORIZED. AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT BY SPOKANE COUNTY OR SUCH OTHER MUNICIPAUTY ASSERTING JURISDICTION OVER THE PROPERTY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELUNG, THE DEVELOPER OR HIS SUCCESSORS SHALL PAY IN U C N A I S T H . TO THE CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 356 THE SUM OF SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($750) FOR EACH NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE AFORESAID OWNERS HAVING HEREUNTO SET THEIR HANDS THIS _ DAY OF STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP BY: HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION ITS GENERAL PARTNER BY BY: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION ITS GENERAL PARTNER WELCO GROUP, INCORPORATED, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION BY, _ ITS FINAL PLAT OF tesolv /615 /s S 1/2 OF SECTI SPE<A\E C WAS-I\ nie, i pptvA7e Ra g5 6Licnitm/ =. 1Q - e0A j 19 Re e(Sei _ w OK p Goole <51 41ertus of / A7* Re55 /1-4f0 /nciot' Ic15 (A) II Iry heouvy rRvirM5-e 7176 Ike ppivfile ,a, ,1NC) c/RAi C "ec 7 6 d Oec ele, GP cove/vmut eccrgc/i /7 die X)Aidetz- 4cridoR'S cuh(c/ icf IS ()!.ole /teeeo fr BE IT FURTHER KNOWN THAT THE OWNERS AS SHOWN HEREON DO HEREBY DEDICATE TO r- PUBUC USE FOREVER TH5 AND ROADS SHOWN WITHIN THIS PLAT. TRACT . ..44: 11% */ r 5•Ce BEING PRIVATE ROADS(,HEREI87 DEDICATED TO THE RIVERWAUC OWNERS ASSOCIATION 1/14 CREATED BY DOCUMENT RECORDED UNDER STATE UBI NUMBER TRACTS "1"..ANt- ONE-FOOT (fl WIDE STRIPS AS .7 f'1 73 il J itNig SHOWN HEREON, ARE HEREBY DEDICATED'TO SPOKANE COUNTY AS GENERAL COUNTY PROPERTY, TO BE DEDICATED FOR ROAD PURPOSES AT SUCH TIME AS THE ROAD IS CONTINUED AS FULL WIDTH RIGHT OF WAY, OR UNTIL ADJACENT LANDS ARE PLATTED. LOTS 24, 25, 36, 52,.96, AND 103 ARE LOCATED ON A TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC/S1UB ROAD. THIS TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC/STUB ROAD MAY BE EXTENDED TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTY AND/OR CONNECT TO EXISTING ROADS OR NEW ROADS AS • DEVELOPMENT AND/OR CIRCULATION NEEDS DICTATE. T AD D STATE OF Ad5cApe 5M/PS '9WD pV Ro.P- 0 paeres p/cletowito ° 7Acs a1Q p cof-- \ 8, T 25 N, R 45 E, W.M., :13T E STATE OF roe -6 be 0 i p COUNTY OF ON THIS DAY OF • 19 • BEFORE ME PERSONALLY APPEARED KNOWN TO ME, OR ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE, TO BE THE OF HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNER . SHIP, AND WHO EXECUTED 11-1E FOREGOING INSTRUMENT ON BEHALF OF SAID CORPORATION, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCH CORPORATION EXECUTED THE SAME AS THEIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR LAST ABOVE WRITTEN. NOTARYPUBUC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF RESIDING IN COUNTY OF ON THIS DAY OF 19_, BEFORE ME PERSONALLY APPEARED. _ KNOWN TO ME, OR ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE, TO BE THE OF DEAN BUILDING•CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP;AND WI-I0 EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT ON BEHALF OF SAID CORPORATION, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCH CORPORATION EXECUTED THE SAME AS THEIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED 711E DAY AND YEAR LAST ABOVE MITTEN. NOTARY PCiBC.IEiiik:10F6R THE SfAitOF RESIDING IN STATE OF COUNT( OF ON THIS _ - - DAY OF , 19 BEFORE ME PERSONALLY APPEARED KNOWN TO ME, OR ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE, TO BE THE OF WELCO GROUP, INCORPORATED, A WASHINGTON CORParaTO AND WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT ON BEHALF OF SAID CORPORATION, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCH CORPORATION EXECUTED THE SAME AS THEIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR LAST ABOVE WRITTEN. NOTARY PUBUC IN AND FOR THE STATEOF RESIDING IN __ 4 1/4 WeRNING-: S Covroll ha Pc)c) izepolvs)b)1,0 6,(Lcb tali.P1Rovt-i - I OR' rf■R1ftri-P5 o C5 ik)t6 -Sg-\i\Ce - t iN e RwPt RoAas tk)c-\vokvt) Ag-scit4i 4RAINP5e eeict"+les5 coNtAiructA cokliAtiti oR ipizovOi 5e1Z.vtoe prtopext•-) 4esc RI be 0,1 *..t.5 OeveLopteve.Nrk Accep+-A 1:`,L-/e1op rneN't O& Sul° seve by Akkowwc. boo_o\wc 92co.tt k%! t$Sutk cot2, ?I'WeeP-*7 Go A pro1/4)p-1-e %Poi SI:tykaN-e . s / ?..)O O\ Pr R 5tt6 ?Rmilk' A•t-tA CA.t.1(veiQ,5' e‘ /k<kluotk>leckc CouN3i hAs coo ob■-i7)11-\ 0C AN kick oF N WhtlASO•eue. i . extfar , I.Ne ) SuRvi comicii FepPkg. mr)rz Nte erszc P c( RI° R ‘j (k ‘ ‘ c51 6 1 .6. c " \ I Z ,.. , 0 7 c‘ A5 LI E: h :\Z :s Gto6u.). ftemo■ii‘-.L. oN A- tORIvP-ke- Ro ) r ) GpRA(NAG-c-- t-erNquPrce. OP gc -ro Re co 9-CL to uiNiskm %\ IZO tqCI /D R 1+ t No.5 e P Lovti (,()J,L(.. be Gefui- to\ Revie. EN3livee2 ..•■••••• ...■11•101. •■•■•■?.... DEPUTY THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN • CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. DAVID E. SCHUMANN, RLS #22121 SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF DIRECTOR, SPOKANE COUNTY UTIUTIES SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ZP_QEME COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS _ DAY OF DIRECTOR, SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT • EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS . DAY OF __ 19. FOR SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER EXAMINED AND APPROVED 17-FS DAY OF , 19 SrA L'..DUNTY ASSE52.S:. 2EPUTY SPOKANE COUNTY COW:ASS1ONERS EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF CHAIRPERSON, SPOKANE COUNTY COMMI SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL TAXES WHICH HAVE BEEN LEVIED AND BECOME CHARGEABLE AGAINST THE LAND SHOWN WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION HAVE BEEN FULLY PAID THIS DAY OF 19___, . SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER BY DEPUTY Phone: (208) 667 AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF _, 19_, AT M. IN BOOK OF PLAT AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF RECt-IVED MAR 0 6 1995 mKANE COMNI"V WI.AIN 17) 19 . 19 4200 West Seltice Way Coeur d'Alen.e, Idaho 83814 1- MAR 2 .1-1995 spomE County Engineeriq COUIVIYENGtNEER North Idaho Engineering Fax: (208) 864-3507 .....emb.‘ .of ‘.....i., 4tr A. \4 0i i 'A.§gae if f :- #), : ,5N( 4... ., °N 4° ■0 1 /1 4 ‘ C. \ ' 00 ) 4 .eAtisri** 0 le 16 vik..Zaer Od cP 6 A '' G 6 ' HEETS LINE DIRECTION R1 ' S78'33'10'W R2 N15'14'32'W ,R3. N15'05'50'W R4 N23'07'32'W R5 N25'44'01'W R6 N26'03'14'W R7 172 .. R8 S65'24'36'W - R9' S60'26'34'W R10 S60 Ril S39 - R12 • S29'59'58'E R13 N80'29'16'E R14 S29'59'58'E Rib NE9'28'2J'W + R1. N23'28 " 2' ./ R17 N22'4.L� ' .R1 N19'21 vet R19 '• N18'52'29'W R20 S52'111SW R2:. N16'37'30'W R22 r N14'55'03. R23 N37'43 car E 0 R24' N09 R25 . NO7'32'31'4/ :R26 N08'52'28'W R27 N40'47'40'E • R28 S70'07'40 'E R29 562V7'52:,..J3 R30 S67'23'53'W R31 S82'36'07'W R32 N?7`31' ^ -3'W n33 N89'24'57'E LINE 1 DIRECTION 1 DISTANCE LENGTH 'Li °`' N89 15.00' Cl ' \ - L2 S89'54'16'E 103.63' 7,10' L3 a, S00'03'10'W 10.00' 109.27' 1_4 S89'56'S0'E 90,00' C3 L5 fZ N00'03'10'E 10,00' 28,30' L6 N00'02'29'W 50.00' 31.40' L7' S89'56'S1'E 50.02' - 'C5 L8 S89•56'51'E 30.00' 28.30' L9 N30'00'02`E 25,00' 20,09' L10" N26'49'17'W 53,52' 410.00' L11 ` N89'g06'_E 21 J S26'57 06'04'07' ..._... L12 S00'35'2 4' 84 7,56' L13' 3 •• C9 • L14 SP9 23'06'W 25,81' N17'03'S8'W 01'28'& Li5 o ••. u'u2'W 1,35' 136,06' L16 S00 00'02'W 15,43' 725.00' L17 N68'45'24'E 21,18' N23'54'06'W 12'11'4 L18 N29'59'58'W 15.61' 244.86' L19` N89'24'5TE 30,00' 410.00' L20 S00'34'05'E 13.17' N05•43'24'W . 11'26' L21 " S00 16.81' 66.96' .:L22 N00'00'02'E 95,00' 715.00' L23 S89'56'51'E 45.00' N65'19'05'E 10'38'0; ° CURVE RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD BEARING DELTA Cl ' 20.00' 7,14' 3,61' 7,10' S09'38'39'W 20'27'23' .,,C2 758.00' 109.27' 54.73' 109.17' N85'15'19'E 08 C3 20,00' 31.43' 20,02' 28,30' N45'01'36'E 90'03'08' C4 20.00' 31.40' 19,98' 28,27' S44'58'24'E 89'56'52' S45'01'C[5_'a/ sjco' 90'03'08' - 'C5 20,00' 31.43' 20.02' 28.30' C6 600.00' 40,16' 20,09' 40.15' N38'58'29'W 03'50'06' • C7 410.00' 43,43' 21,73' 43.41' S26'57 06'04'07' C8 20.00' 14.45' 7,56' 14,14' S69•54'37`E 41'24'35' •• C9 725,00' 18,67' 9.34' 18,67' N17'03'S8'W 01'28'& C10 625.00' 267,95' 136,06' 265,90' S28'36'37'E 24'33'49) - C11 725.00' 154.32' 77.45' 154.03' N23'54'06'W 12'11'4 C12 2129.86' 487.58' 244.86' 486.51' N69'25'32'E 13'06' C13 410.00' 8192' 41.10' s •38' N05•43'24'W . 11'26' C14 410.00' 132.7 '" " 66.96' 1.1 N20 ,.I 16"33'02 ` C15 715.00' 1:32.7:2 66,55' 132,53' N65'19'05'E 10'38'0; ° C16 715,00' 233,97' 118,04' 232,93' N80•00'37'E 18' ;'J C17 . 685.00' 82.82' 41,46' 3. N85'55'17'E 06 C18 385,00' 49.71' 24,89' 49.68' NO3'41' 6)✓ 1:7'23S4''' ' N15'00'00'W 15'12 Z' C19 385.00' 102.16' 51.38' 101.86' C20 385,00' 4931' 24.89' 49.67' N26•18'03'W 07'23'P2 C21 758.00' 121,18' 60.72' 121.06' N76'32'4 4'E 09'09'3 ' C22 20,00' 31.40' 19.98' 28,27' S44'58'25'E 89'56'.2' C23 20,00' 31.40' 19,98' 28,27' S44'58'25'E 89'56' C24 20,00' 31,43' 20,02' 28,30' S45'01 90'03 C25 435,00' 16.19' 8,10' 16,19' N28•56'00'W 011'077 C26 435.00' 79,23' 39.73' 79,12' N22 10'26'I :' C27 20,00' 30,65' 19.25' 27,74' S61'20'12'E 87'48'41' C28 435.00' 46.00' 23,02' 45.98' NO3'01'45'W 06'03'33' -C29 20,00' 28.26' 17.07' 25,9i' S34•25'19'W 80'57'41' C30 20,00' 24,02' 13,70' 22.60' S32'07 ? 2.68'48'34' C31 20.00' 9.68' 4,93' 958' S16•08'27'E 27'43'03' C32 20.00' 24,02' 13.70' 22,60' N72'13'13'W 68'48'3' C33 , 20.00' 2.73' 1,37' 2,73' N33'54'27'W 07'4 57 C34 758.00' 6.96' 3,48' 6,96' N60'15'48'E 00'31'33' C35 >: 745.00' 84,87' 42.48' 84,82' N63'15'50`E 06'31'37' C36 745.00' 20.00' 208.17' 24.26' 104.77' 13,88' 207.49' 22.80' N81'22'48'E 16•00_ S54'37'43'W 69'30'46' C37 C38 20.00' 24.26' 13.88' 22,80' S25'14'39'W 69'30'46' C39 20,00' 7.15' 3.61' 7.11' S19'45'21'E 20 C40 20.00' 7.15' 3,61' 7.11' N40'14'36'W 20'25`I C41 20.00' 24.26' 13.88' 22.80' N85'14'36'W 69'30'46',] C42 700,00' 7.79' 3,90' 739' N29 00'38'15' . C43 . 750,00' 5,79' 2.89' 5,79' N29'46'42'W 00 C44 600.00' 21.88' 10,94' 21.88' S17'22'24'E 02'05' 4` C45 750,00' 43,12' 21.57' 43.12' N17'58'32'W 03 C46 20,00' 29,67' 18,32' 27.02' N21'27'08'E 84'59 6' I C47 20.00' 33,66' 22,38' 29.82' N67'31'19'W 96'25'23' , C48 685.00' 87,18' 43.65' 87.12' N63'38'47`E 07'17'31^ C49 20,00' 24,55' 14,09' 23,03' S77'32'It%j" 70'19'04' , -050 °- 20.00' 24,55' 14,09' 23,03' N39'54'6E4r. 70'19'04' 1 C51 685,00' 62,25' 31.15' 62.23' N77'40'28`E 05'12'25' • C52 672,00' 104.36' 52,28' 104.25' N64'2 67'_ 08'53'52' C53 672,00' 26,12' 13,06' 26.12' N70'00'42'E 02'13'38' , C54 672,00' 27.44' 13,72' 27,44' N72 02'20'4 C55 672.00' 77.81' 38.95' 77.76' N76'46'56'E 06'38''02' C56 672.00' 235.73' 119.09' 234.52' N70'02'59'E 20'05'55' SEE DETAIL 'F' Vie 30,00' BALDWIN yl`�.I�ll�6l. AUGUSTA W W 0 0 117 in cal co 00 0 0 v NN4 I 18 A17 S89'23'06'V 60.00' 30.00' RE -STEEL PIN AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #4337 FOR W 1/4 CORNER. RP'S PER COUNTY RECORD. #8109180257 (NOT A PART) FD. 1/2 INCH REBAR W /SURCAP MARKED `WELBORN PLS 15043' N89 °23'06'E 370.00' (R2) S89 °23'06'W 369.88' (M) 322.29' 1-- c11 }�q17 1; A 226.45' - 'j'iACT FOUND 1/2' REBAR W/ PLASTIC CAP RLS #22121 3 .�' 291,47 ' C36 226.50' 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 602;52- w C2 EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL 'A' UNPLATTED N89'56'S0'W _ _ N89 °56'S0'W _ FD. SPOKANE COUNTY I BRASS CAP AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD 42455 RP'S PER COUNTY RECORD, - VE 4k810918 257 (NOT A "ART) FD. 1/2' REBAR W/ SURCAP MARKED 'WELBORN PLS 15043' N C55 N J C51 TRACT 'B' 331 - EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW RIANGLE - SEE DETAIL 'C' 100.42' •` Lori 6,68 SFr-,' N89 103.63' - �irr °}. 6,7 SF S89•56'51'E o 125.00' N° c 4 ',9 #.I• ' 9,097 SF o C` S S ° s r 9,100 SF _, A o o2 ,\4l �cS) ��o 00002 lC • \s 7 \ • . 5 ✓ �o00u \ a 9,888 SF cz 6 7,260 SF N I �� .y\ d a 9,335 SF\ ' • 9,06T SF \`' sc •a_ 1.6 0 1 25" 25' EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL 'B' 16' :> DEWALK, SLOPE, AND UT:: ITY EASEMENT <TYP) EASEMENT FOR :LEAR VIEW TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL '13' 55; . 0' _ 627.6 0 in NO DIRECT ACCESS TO LOTS WITHIN RIVERWALK TO THE WASHINGTON STATE CENTENNIAL TRAIL IS PERMITTED PER SPOKANE COUNTY REQUIREMENTS. 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT S89'54'16'E `r 103.63' • 7o 6,736 SF N89'54'16' \,) I 103.63' .6,7 SF Ni ? S89'54'16'E CD O UNPLATTED z is v5 103.63' tip O V'1 0 1, 1 6.736 i (1-n N89'5 '16'W L2 MISSION AVENUE EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL 'D' TRACT 'H' 7,906 SF 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT - I�r1 C12 • 1A B.5 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE AND � 2 i C./ ,� UTILITY EASEMENT CTYP) 7,983 Sr o •S89'59'58'E ° cv 1� 00'rL` Jo v�21 SF 1 , 1 2 N89•59'58'W . 100.00'„ . 1 N 6 6,521 SF ,Ir X -' 100,00' ■89•59'58'V o. 1 `" 6,431 SF N L7 L8 L'71 L/5 1 89 WALK F S89 215,00' 0 co W cu 0 S 89 °56'44' E .2615.78' (RL1) N 89 °56'50' W 2615.78' (M) E3 AUGUSTA LANE iV F TRACT 'A' 62,032 SF 1,42 AC ape I) 5 e.7(: ' • S 1/2 ❑c• SDIKAN_ CCJJNTY,, VJAJ - l\ (U � ,N otN (?4,S o -1 13' DRAINAGE,SLOPE AND DRAINAGE,SLOPE AND 9 . UTILITY EASEMENT s 8. UNPLATTED 1988.16' _ ___; FINAL PLAT OF TRACT 'J' 1' WIDE STRIP o S g y 6,699 v i* kr \PI ti N s \0 co e . UNPLATTED ;* N� Ou {&D6 of pIc; L u�d� -1 Need �Need j 1(1•Gv p r, �'"' - � � (��,,� A ��,�„� (_ \.J i . e . Oe5cRIpic1� 1 p c d� 0( k1- Y 'I J w li °rR'€ �vcv/hE= h Cl \j ew - -tPrNGise DRA( T S F o y � � �1l Re � J h IJ t 5A C e z-rudl �� ry ¶ -r Re Fof- fore . 4.5Q J.- :«(e j CAL) ibe ., .. -..N 'Descr-1 yogi 05e e w∎ - R° StctewA 1 Slab Amp vi >, ST All)ll)ITTOT S EC T I O N 11 7 E 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL 'E' FD. SPOKANE COUNTY BRASS CAP WITH X DN CENTE'LINE OF MISSION AVENUE AS INDICATED' DN SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #2454 F CIS S 1/4 CORNER RP'S PER ; COUNTY RECORD. Lie, 8, T 2 5 N, R 4 5 E, \' Y N SURVEYOR'S NOTES THE RECORD INFORMATION ON THIS MAP WAS TAKEN FROM SPOKANE COUNTY RECORDS AS FOLLOWS' RECORD LABEL BOOKS. OF SURVEYS! (RL1) BOOK 27, PAGE 42 (RL2) BOOK 25, PAGE 83 (RL3) BOOK 9, PAGE 79 (RL4) BOOK 50, PAGE 27 it s . EASEME°t1T OR /TEMPORARY TURN- A -L .OUN , lhc� iV C/3/1 be E_2) 5\.\0(A) )1,1a { , Lei R lV A - F Sou 1 AND SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORDS! #4337 #2455 #2454 RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION CONTAINS 13 ACRES GROSS, TRACT `INSISTS OF THE PRIVATE ROADS McMILLAN LANE, BALDWIN LANE, HARMONY LANE, AND AUGUSTA LANE, AND CONTAINS 2,42 ACRES, QD eCi 2 - )c 0°' 1/4O CURVE TABLE U ■ TO LR 81-00kS P'�D Gheck w i'!1� p(cj �- F cu°‘4 RC Al U h+i:eiteDi{ C57 7q-S 0 1) GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100 ft. BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS MAP IS THE WEST LINE OF THE SW 1/ 4 OF SECTION 8 TAKEN AS S 00 °35'03' E, TAKEN FROM R;D.S FILED AT BOOK 27, PAGE 42, OF SURVEYS, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, ACCURACY STATEMENT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED USING A PENTAX PX1OD 10 SECOND THEODOLITE WITH 5N BOARD ELECTRONIC DISTANCE METER. FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS WERE USE.D T.N ACCORDANCE WITH WAC 332 - 130 -90 SECTION 'C', '1 P 57 L r e c - T g;11 U2IN oar Secs O� 40? --_e l6C RP A I e.S - RADIAL LINE TABLE R3. No /0 Ir R35 59°5`1 " 1 2 5 Go ° cc/ '`w T. O SET 1/2 INCH REBAR W/ RED CAP RLS #22121, DR AS NOTED 31+ DR aO FD. CONTROLLING SECTION CORNER OR 1/4 CORNER AS DESCRIBED o CALCULATED POINT - NOTHING SET B.S. BUILDING SETBACK (R), R# RADIAL BEARING (M) FIELD MEASUREMENT (RL #) RECORD LABEL North Idaho Engineering 4200 West Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 Phone: (208) 887 -1171 Fax: (208) 884 -3507 R !t N AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF ,` 19 , AT M. IN BOOK OF PLAT AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF DEPUTY R Z LINE TABLE LEGEND FD. MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED SET 2 INCH IRON PIPE W/ BRASS CAP MARKED RLS #22121 IN MONUMENT CASE ti tu..�a MAR 0 6 1995 ;,, C4,,.,1 SITE Lai., RECEIVED MAR 21 1995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SHEET 2 _J CO 03 cJ c'j 4=1 " \D m lCUOj CY LJLJ I Co Co I . tr) -9 c') co CD I (/) I a..- 30.00' = 1130) R = 20.00' T = 2.01' L = 4.02' 60 00' cD in co 0 cD 20 L19 30.00' -4- 8 18 v 17 1111111t 0 0 0' 0 m co cn DETAIL 5' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT GRAPHIC SCALE 80 'TE:= ( IN FEET 1 inch = 40 ft. 48109180257 (NOT A PART) FD, 1/2 INCH REBAR 7 W/SURCAP MARKED 'WELBORN PLS 15043° S8923'06'W 322.29' 226.45' 25 SIDEWALX, DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEME T 0, S89°23'06'W 291.47' c INDIANA AVENUE DRAINAGE. 'C' 25.00'- AINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT N89°23'06'E 5' FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA • EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIAALE • EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE #8109180257 (NOT A PART) 94.21 S 00 E 0.25' cU -1 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT: 1 G' FD, 1/2 INCH REBAR W/SURCAP MARKED 'WE-BORN PLS 15043' S 89'23'06" W 25.81' cu S 8923'06" W 25.81' C51. go. 6.0 so• 12.33 • • • N 79'15'58" E 28.46' 25' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UllUTY EASEMENT EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE S89°23'06'W 291,47' 226.50' C.4 0 0 (-4 #810918C257 (NOT A PART) 160 5' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTIUTY EASEMENT s 7 915 ' 58 ' g4.2 C17 FD. 1/2 INCH REBAR W/SURCAP MARKED 'WELBORN PLS 15043' IVE OM A = 11'0743" R = 20.00' T = 1.95' L = 3.88' c55 7 c51. \ TRACT 'I' 1' WIDE STRIP 1 WALK, A PERTI1\ EF T-E c,5 7 A 18 V 17 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UT1UTY EASEMENT A = 18'31'28" R = 20.00' T = 3.26' L = 6.47' c.5 3ETAIL " EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE // SP EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE FINAL PLAT EF t UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) 6' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND T : 20.00' ' L = 7.62' S 83'45'00" W S...19:51 E N89 SECTIE\ 8, 1 25 R EUNFY, WAS-INGTEN ccie ,511,, 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) 627.62' 20 185.87' 0 0 1 Lr) 0 in _1 ST ADDITION 0 0 MISSION AVENUE S 89°56'44" E 2615,78' (RLI) N 89 W 2615.78' (M) C3 45.05' EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE • L 5 3ETAIL 11 13" UNPLATTED 44.95' L4 = 40'29 R = 20.00' T = 7.38' C4 \A/ 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 0 c.4 1 vi 14 = 4144'43" R = 20.00' T = 7.63' L = 14.57' R1 ■ s = R = 20.00' T = 3.84' L = 7.58' N 83'38'45" N 8956'50" W • 13' DHAINA , SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LETAIL 205.75' 185.93' EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE 091 fe) ,0 06 EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE 1988.16' 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY ;ZASEXENT 1 EASEMENT FER CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) 16' SIDEWALK, SLO UTILITY EASEMENT 8 17 = 3656'05" R= 20.00' T = 6.68' L = 12.89' AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF AT M. IN BOOK OF PLAT AT PAGE • AT THE REQUEST OF DEPUTY SHEET A = 024859 R = 700.00' c \ \ T = 17.21' \ cr u■ L = 34.41' % 1r, ■ v\:.. \ 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) North Idaho Engineering 4200 West Seltice Way Coeur d.'Alen.e, Idaho 83814 Phone: (208) 667-1171 Fax: (208) 664-3507 RECEIVED MAR 0 6 1995 .r.° KoaNe iq TV C°1371 r' A Fr RECEIVED MAR 241 sPoK mEcouNTYENGINEE B 12/22/44 45814EHAP2D14e, HEETS SITE PLAN OF RECORD m 0 N O W C 0 Cr CO W W m < 0 CO M IS N to 0 z • • . 592 784c 12• � J L % �73 7_ . X8..9..3 ,4c . i /75 A [ 20' 755/ 0t7 17 12EVI5EI7 d'- VCE-S`90. b' 5 E /D - 5S S: Vic: 4/ 307k. L - 25 - MS SIM AVENUE 45 1660 -tea 4" j ; -ct S � G?! '0 0n-1A: ,� 25/9c, vG T�� " /.. �� 44 1 t�+• L A MIONSEI 1111 II NI affilliT mid • i7zim 7 8 JER/ RA y LS; 64 9 17 ) CURVE RADIUS LENGTH 1 TANGENT CHORD 1 BEARING 1 DELTA CI 20.00' 7.14' 3.61' 7.10' S09'38 20'27'23' C2 758.00' 109.27' 54.73' 109.17' N85'15'19'E 08 C3 20.00' 31,43' 20.02' 28.30' N45'01'36'E 90'03'08' C4 20.00' 31.40' 19,98' 28,27' S44'58'24'E 89 C5 20.00' 31.43' 20,02' 28.30' S45'01' 90'03'08' C6 • 600.00' 40.16' 20,09' 40.15' N38'58'29'W 03 °50'00' C7 410.00' 4143' 21.73' 43.41' S26•57'55'E 06'04 C8 20.00' 14.45' 7.56' 14.14' S69•54'37'E 41'24'35' C9 725.00' 18.67' 9.34' 18,67' N17'03 01'28'P a9 C10 625.00' .267.95' 136.06' 265.90 S28'36'37'E 24'33'49' C11 , 725.00' 154.32' 77.45' 154,03' N23'54'06'W 1211'44 C12 2129.86' 487.58' 244.86' 48651' N69 13'06' C13 410.00' 81.92' 41.10' 81.78' NOO5•43'24'W 11'26' C14 410.00' 132.76' 66.96' 132.18' N20'43'24'W 18'33'0E' C15 715.00' 132.72' 6655' 132.53' N651.9'05 10 ;' C16 - . 715.00' 233.97 118.04' 232,93' N80 18'44'5)' C17 685.00' 82.82' 41.46' 82.76' N85 °55'17'E 06 C18 385.00' 49.71' 24.89' 49.68' NO3'41'r6 ,W U7'2 44 15'12'1,-+' C19 385.00' 102,16' 51.38' 101.86' N15'00'BO'W C20 385.00' 49.71' 24.89' 49.67' N26•18'03' \V 07'23' i2� C21 758.00' 121.18' 60.72' 121.06' N76•32'44'E 09 •' C22 20,00' 31.40' 19.98' 28,27' S44 89 C23 20,00' 31.40' 19.98' 28.27' S44•58'25'E 89'56' C24 20,00' 31.43' 2002' 28.30' S45'01'35'W 90 C25 435.00' 16.19' 8d0' 16.19' N28'56'00'W 02 C26 435.00' 7923' 39,73' 79.12' N22'38'56' \,/ 10'26'u:' C27 20.00' 30.65' 19.25' 27.74' S61'20'12'E 87 C28 43500' 46.00' 23.02' 45.98' NO3'01'45'W 06 C29 20.00' 28.26' 17.07' 25.97' S34•25'19'W 80'57'41' C30 20,00' 24.02' 13.70' 22.60' S32'07C1G 68 C31 20.00' 9.68' 4.93' 9.58' S16 27'43'03' C32 20.00' 24.02' 13.70' 22.60' N72'13'13'1./ 68'48`,34.1 C33 20,00' 2.73' 1,37' 2,73' N33'54'27'1../ 07 57 ' C34 758.00' 6.96' 3.48' 6.96' N60 00 C35 745.00' 84.87' 42.48' 84,82' - N63•15'50'E 06'31'37' C36 745,00' 208.17' 104.77' 207,49' N81'22'48'E 16•000 ; C37 20.00' 24.26' 13.88' 22.80' S54•37'43'W 69'30'46' C38 20,00' 24.26' 13.88' 22.80' S25'14'39'W 69 C39 20.00' 7.15' 3.61' 7,11' S19'45'21'E 20'29'14'. C40 20.00' 7.15' 3.61' 7.11' N40 20'21 C41 20.00' 24.26' 13.88' 22,80' N85'14'36'W 69 C42 700.00' 7.79' 3,90' 7.79' N29•40'51'W 00'38'15`! C43 -, 750.00' 5.79' 2,89' 5.79' N29'46'42'W 00'26'32` C44 600.00' 21.88' 10.94' 21.88' S17'22'24'E 02'05' 4'' a C45 750.00' 43.12' 21.57' 43.12' N17'58'32'W 03'17 C46 20,00' 29,67' 18,32' 27.02' N21'27'08'E 84 6' C47, 20.00' 33.66' 22,38' 29.82' N67'31'19' \../ 96 C48 685.00' 87,18' 43.65' 87.12' N63 07'17'31" C49 20,00' 24,55' 14,09' 23.03' S77'32'_+ 70 C50 20.00' 24.55' 14.09' 23.03' N39 °54'0E4 ' 70'19'04' 0512'25' C51 685,00' 62.25' 31.15' 62.23' N77 C52 672.00' 104.36' 52.28' • 13.06' 104,25' 26.12' N64'26071/ N70'00'42'E 11 08 . 53'52' 02'13'38' C53 672,00' 26.12' C54 672,00' 27.44' 13.72' 27.44' N72'17'43'E 02 C55 672.00' 77,81' 38.95' 77.76' N76'46 06 C56 672,00' 235.73' 119.09' 234.52' N70'02'59'E 20'05'55' LINE DIRECTION RI S78 R2 N1514'32'W R3 N15 R4 N2317'32'W R5 N25'44'01'W R6 N26'03'14'W R7 N72•11'46'E R8 S65'24'36'W R9 S60'26'34'W R10 S60 R11 S39'30'47'W R12 S29'59'58'E R13 N80 R14 S29'59'58'E R15 N29'28'25'4/ R16 N23'28'0A R17 N22'4. R18 N19'2142 5 / R19 N18'52'29'W R20 S5211I Egr _ R21 ^ N16 R22' N14 4 R23 N87'43tD E 0. R24 N09'43'20'W R25 N07 R26 N08'52'28'W R27 N40'47'40'E R28 S70 °07' • O'E R29 S62 i } j__ R30 S67 °23'53'W R31 S82'36'07'W R32 N17'31'43'W R33 N89•24'57•E LINE 1 DIRECTION 1 DISTANCE Ll N89 15.00' k L2 S89'54'16'E 103,63' L3 et., S00•03'10'W 10.00' L4 S89•56'50'E 90.00' L5 R N00'03'10'E 10,00' L6 N00'02'29'W 5000' L7 S89 • 50.02' L8 S89 30.00' L9 N30•00'02'E 25.00' L10 N26'49'17'W 53.52' L11' N89'' '06'E 21,, bJ 84,•. ®. L12 S00`.5'24'E L13 ° � 0i . r n '33- L14 S89•23'06'W 25.81' L15 S00'00'02'W 1.35' L16 S00'00'02'W 15.43' L17 ` N68 21,18' L18 N29'59'58'W 15.61' L19 N89 30.00' L20 S00'34'05'E 13.17' L21 S00 16,81' L22 N00'00'02•E 95,00' L23 S89'56'51'E 45.00' bra k SEE DETAIL 'F " - --- �Ihcr v v M �+ Lfi BALDWIN AUGUSTA 30.00' -- ro- ✓ � N OD. co CU d•• \D t0 CU o Liu • • 0 In • in co o O 6 0 0 O 0 718 o; R lr) Cn C OD L19 � c - L R33) ' #8109180257 d� (NOT A PART) d tj S89 °23'06'W 60.00' 30,00' 18017 RE -STEEL PIN AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #4337 FOR W 1/4 CORNER. RP'S PER COUNTY RECORD. FD, 1/2 INCH REBAR W /SURCAP MARKED 'WELBORN PLS 15043° N89 °23'06'E 370.00' (R2) S89 °23'06'W 369.88' (M) 322.29' • 226.45' - 'TR " F s C17 RpC 291.47' 1 � / S 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL 'A' FOUND 1/2' REBAR W/ PLASTIC CAP RLS #22121 03 226.50' C36 a;. 7-S E_ UNPLATTED 30' ' N89'56'50'W 55'- '.,80' FD, SPOKANE COUNTY BRASS CAP AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #2455 RP'S PER COUNTY RECORD. RIVER WALK r: N' =Mt EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW RIANGLE - SEE DETAIL 'C' C2 #8109180257 (NOT A PART) FD. 1/2' REBAR W/ SURCAP MARKED 'WELBORNPLS 15043' N 73 �‘I TRA T ' G .a �k TRACT 'F' 1; N.T.S. C 1 s F co O 0 I!) [n tn EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL 'B' i CU NO DIRECT ACCESS TO LOTS WITHIN RIVERWALK TO WASHINGTON STATE CENTENNIAL TRAIL IS PERMITTED PER SPOKANE COUNTY REQUIREMENTS. 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 1 \\ • 'o "•7,8 •, P • S89'54'1611 100.42' 6,683 SFr. 1489'54'16'W � ' 103. 63' du 6,7 SF S89•54'16'E 103.63' o : 6 er 6,736 SF S89'54'16'E 103.63' 6,73 SF...l• t N89 • 103.63' '6,736 SF S8989 ° 54'16'E o . vi 103.63' tF ( y 1 � J O c ' 9 ^cur 0 0 M W 6,736 SF;;) tq • N89'54'16'' 103.63' 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) L2 A UNPLATTED JO ,736 SF 4 Cr) EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL 'D' t3 Im t o I cu d R1 R31 �N P. � y o L N89 °56'50 °W _. ! _627.62' _..._. MISSION AVENUE �h 0 W of z a S89 °56'S1'E N o 125.00' 25' 25' • 4 S 3g J : N89'S9 'S8 'W I . 100.00'� C. •� CU 0 ti 6 10201.0 ; 521 SF in X 100.00' N89'59'58'V 1 i I P. 6,4311SF C .80,02' L232 cu u o p 11) ;6,%41 SF 8 •59'58' • 70,00' W 1 6.737 SF C L7 13 TRACT 'H' 7,906 SF y82' 7,739 SF • ° (6 )).00 , #2 „, '2 ,4 R I :i L 0 0 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 0 co Ll I • Cu 0 S 89 °56'44' E .2615.78' (RL1 N 89 °56'50' W 2615.78' (M) NI L] F T 1 1988.16' 1 7,257SF,,, o N�o ' X6 0 o .' w 44 8,039 SF 7, "SF . egg wt '.�Zc1 cP S89 °56'51'E 215.00' o AUGUSTA LANE 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) 7,260 SF N I -- ir ;02 5 6 0 ` B'S • UTILITY 1 ' SIDEWALK, SLOPE AND 7,98 o S89 .° TRACT 'A' 62,032 SF 1.42 AC s THE '3 � tS\ , $ 7,383 SF 'N� 0 EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL 'B' 1 / 2 SP�'C /� •' 9,097 SF s \r 1 bc% 2 � ' ) •% • s (/ IRE 9.100 SF V� c9 r �S '• n ic oo +s \ \■ Ra F; av n 9,335 SF \ o ?° . , 6) _ ate, - •1 B q -' 8 0 SF ,F,6 � o 3 1 2 9 `v '�-�\-st 7.925 SF c 'o_'• AO i. UNPLATTED AS ty5 ANT C LUNTY, WAS o y? c e,e (4) R �� 13' DRAINAGE,SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT s O � 0 \\ x,2 eL \ ° t 8,1 SF .' c" •g� a � �5 Zoo TRACT °J' 1' WIDE STRIP a 9,06 SF c8 y ,55 \ co 0 S9o?, FINAL_ PLAT 2 25 98 �K5 (e. b \8,690 SF 3 < V 8 2 t� 8,8 1� F 3 2 L 55 b�' \. ff .p9 • • 8 59 < \\ 1 8,639 SF \co � � S 0 k cp 1 RS T UNPLATTED CTILN 8, 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) - EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL 'E' EASEMENT FOR TEMPORARY TURN -A - ROUND. ThiS cow be Rh N Ley FD. SPOKANE COUNTY BRASS CAP WITH X ON CENTERLINE OF MISSION AVENUE AS 8 Q3 INDICATED ON SPOKANE 1 COUNTY CORNER RECORD ' #2454 FORS 1/4 CORNER RP'S PER COUNTY RECORD. (277) 5how RIVA + 5ou� ; 2 5 N\ 100 b�l- 13 : s)uw ► TO LO • ; s �p w 1-04's P Re Au� � .a 7 1 ADDITION R 45 SURVEYOR'S NOTES THE RECORD INFORMATION ON THIS MAP WAS TAKEN FROM SPOKANE COUNTY RECORDS AS FOLLOWS: RECORD LABEL BOOKS. OF SURVEYS: (RL1) BOOK 27, PAGE 42 CRL2) BOOK 25, PAGE 83 (RL3) BOOK 9, PAGE 79 (RL4) BOOK 50, PAGE 27 AND SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORDS: #4337 #2455 #2454 RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION CONTAINS 1: ACRES GROSS, U TRACT CONSISTS OF THE PRIVATE ROADS McMILLAN LANE, BALDWIN LANE, HARMONY LANE, / AND AUGUSTA LANE, AND CONTAINS 2.42 ACRES, l C-(30 �� Co� CURVE TABLE � ,GS fa) c57 1 S•w GRAPHIC SCALE 50 100 \ V 1) ;.? �r..... � :ice �• 200 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100 ft. ACCURACY STATEMENT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED USING A PENTAX PX1OD 10 SECOND THEODOLITE WITH ON BOARD ELECTRONIC DISTANCE METER. FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS WERE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WAC 332- 130 -90 SECTION "C ". 6 - SG•. 400 BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS MAP IS THE WEST LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 8 TAKEN AS S 00 0 35 1 03° E, TAKEN FROM R;O,S. FILED AT BOOK 27, PAGE 42, OF SURVEYS, SPOKANE COUNTY \,/ ASHINGTON. G 5 N 5 U 3 .7 4 8 " 9 c qi en�c e LN T•,,, l LA e U \ De- CimoalV CANv JN tz (Moot, %6e(zgpANC ! e.S RADIAL LINE TABLE 123y NO ° O3 '!O'`'& R35 5 9 .5=1-1 (13" c7 J5 �0O °o0 r Phone: 0 � M if i Go ti t AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF , 19 AT M. IN BOOK OF PLAT AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF DEPUTY I II 5o° 3503 (208) '867 -1171 LEGEND FD. MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED LINE TABLE a 7 s SET 1/2 INCH REBAR W/ RED CAP RLS *22121, OR AS NOTED OR n0-=i FD. CONTROLLING SECTION CORNER OR 1/4 CORNER AS DESCRIBED o CALCULATED POINT - NOTHING SET B.S. BUILDING SETBACK SET 2 INCH IRON PIPE W/ BRASS CAP MARKED RLS #22121 IN MONUMENT CASE RADIAL BEARING FIELD MEASUREMENT RECORD LABEL 4200 West Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 North Idaho Engineering Fax: (208) 684 -3507 RECEIVED MAR 211995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER G • IMAP.DW6 SHEET 2 3 HEFTS opt 01 _ 014 j mews aui&)D of plw� dR : 1 ,M, of Walt pRepPrRe DUcvlhE =N • This Foil Cle .. Ulew 'I'Rift 1- i D A ry cu lid - 5A-c- c 1"k cr A- Re Fay 4'lor OLoma ? - E s,c.,(e we 1,e. , Wt� L e - 1- y Ap -ouA)t a Mc CA u be cjR''!T'�: "2.0 io+u 105 1l e R 0.1•1 1(0 & cAewAt k 1 Slo f e Pt No U s 11+4 € e bet lNIA5 e eJ C J MAR 0 6 1995 .''OKANZ: COUNTY Pt_ !NG 4ERARTMEIrr SITE PLAN OF RECORD 0' l_ m 60 00' 7 ,' • r 8 18 V 17 DETAIL 20 J A = 11 "• R = 20.00 T = 2.01' L = 4.02' L11 Re C1 L19 • L1 <R33) 30.00 -e-' 2/ Q- #8109180257 (NOT A PART) FD, 1/2 -INCH REBAR W /SURCAP MARKED 'WELBORN PLS 15043° w I in 0 0 0 0 w cr1 0 c.J m Fp ▪ s 0 M 0 cn A ,, 5' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT GRAPHIC SCALE 80 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft S89'23'06'W 322.29' S89 ° 23'06'W 291,47`` ° - -� w I INDIANA AVENUE 226.50' w TRACT 'C' 25.00' o 13' D AINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 25' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY' EASEMENT fN89 °23'06'E 245.23' "♦ 25' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTIUTY EASEMENT 5' FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TR LE N 7915'58" E 28.46' dea 12.33 EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE S89'23'06'W 291.47' 226.45' R VE WALK 5' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ti- 160 S-1915'58" W EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE S -791553" .* e tta \e/ ' fJ' #8109180257 (NOT A PART) S 00'34'05" E 0.25' 94.2 FD. 1/2 INCH REBAR W /SURCAP MARKED 'WELBORN PLS 15043' S 89'23'06" W 25.81' #8109180257 q . (NOT A PART) c17 FD. 1/2 INCH REBAR - W /SURCAP MARKED 'WELBORN PLS 15043' 1 N J 1 c55 94.2 S 8973'06" 5 81' . C51 r N J a 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT C51 A = 11'07'43" R = 20.00' T = 1.95' L = 3.88' T RAC M TRACT 'I' 1' WIDE STRIP A PCRTIIIN ❑ C5 7 A $ 18 V 17 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT C49 DETA C A = 18'31'28" R = 20.00' T= 3.26' L = 6.47' CS Jk 3 L ,1 C " SP l {A\ EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE G FINAL PLAT EF S- C -Ili\ 8, T 25 N R C UNTY \A/ASHINGTLN EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE 40 1-\17 S T s 6' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) 205.69' S 83'45'00" W 1 19'56'50" E 185.87' 0 0 N89 'W 627.62' •' 39" ` = 20.00' T = 3.86' L = 7.62' 0 J 0 O 0 N C3 45.05' EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE l L4 DETAIL "B" 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT UNPLATTED L = 40'29 00 R = 20.00' T =7.38' /L= 14.13' 4 tt o1 --) C4 44.95' • - A, 48 13' DRAINA , SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT A ll)DI'f'ION \i/ v i Il MISSION AVENUE S 89 °56'44" E 2615.78' (RL1) N 89 °56'50' W 2615,78' CM) 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) 0 0 N • _ R = 20.00' T = 3.84' L = 7.58' 41'44'43" R = 20.00' T = 7.63' = 14 ;fl • 0 DETAIL N 83'38'45" .57' N 89'56'50" W R13 ,, , � mU a EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE 2 05.75' 185.93' , §D 103 EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE 1988.16' 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT GYP) 46 16' ;SIDEWALK, SLOP. A UTILITY EASEMENT 8 ct 17 0 i 4 O 49 0 = 02'48'59" R 700.00' T = 17.21' L = 34.41' c0 A = 36'56'05" R= 20.00' T = 6.68' L = 12.89' a • AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF , 19 AT M, IN BOOK OF PLAT AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF DEPUTY DETAIL "E" Phone: (208) 667 -1171 REc 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) 15°,WCR. � 98 RECEIVED MAR 2 1- 1995 sPoKANE COUNTY ENGINEER North Idaho Engineering 4200 West Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 Fax: (208) 664 -3507 SITE PLAN OF RECORD 12/22/c14 SHEET 3 3 HEETS GEAR 0 6 1995 SP OK AN t01.110r EP AIR Tv1;,- "7717r DEDICATION_ R VE KNOW BY ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT JAMES F. ETTER AND BILLIE A. ETTER, HUSBAND AND WIFE AND GLORIA D. HEDLUND, A WIDOW, HAVE CAUSED TO BE PLATTED INTO LOTS, BLOCKS AND STREETS, THE LAND SHOWN HEREON, TO ;BE KNOWN AS RIVERWAY VILLA FIRST ADD •► : .! . • . RCEL OF LAND IN THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE, • WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOA , A PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE .SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST, W.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOVv'S: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE NORTH 00'35'03" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 88:.91 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 8923'06" EAST 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE PUNT OF BEGINNING MARKED BY A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CA='; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 89'23'06" EAST 370.30 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; . . THENCE SOUTH 29'56'26" EAST 215.95 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 00'00'04" WEST 455.00 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 89'54'16" EAST 103.63 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH DEBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 00'00'02" WEST 36.41 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH F _BAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 89'56'51" EAST 120.00 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH .''.EBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 00'00'02" EAST 195.00 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH :REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 89'56'51" EAST 30.00 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH EBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 00'00'02" EAST 180.42 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH ;?FBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; ., THENCE SOUTH 89'56'51" EAST 215.00 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH .''.EBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 4229'21 EAST 89.99 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 59'59'58" EAST 182.52 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 30'00'02" EAST 25.00 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 59'59'58" WEST 102.02 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 26'49'17" WEST 53.52 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; 95-4+3 ? ? THENCE NORTH 49 EAST 135.4 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG A NON- TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 500.00 FEET, CONCAVED NORTHEASTERLY WITH A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 38'58'29" WEST, AN ARC LENGTH OF 40.16 FEET, AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03'50'06" TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 52'56'34" EAST 150.00 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH FEBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 27'41'51" WEST 146.37 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH R BAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 22'40'02" WEST 148.55 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 29'59'58" WEST 282.98 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH i'!BAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 60'00'02" WEST 616.86 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH RPPBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY OF RADIUS 265.00 FEET THROUGH AN ARC LENGTH OF 135.91 FEET AND A CENTRAL AN :,LE OF 2923'04" TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 89'23'06" WEST 370.27 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BARKER ROAD; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BARKER ROAD SOUTH 00'35'03" EAST 70.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Y VILLA FYI A PORTIO\ OF T S P SW 1/ <A \= C FI \AL PLAT OF S =CTIO\ 8, T 25 \TY, WAS -INGT AND THEY DO HEREBY DEDICATE. TO PUBLIC USE FOREVER THE STREETS AND ROADS SHOWN WITHIN THIS PLAT. BLOCK 1, LOT 11; BLOCK 2, LOT 3; BLOCK 3, LOT 5; BLOCK 5, LOT 9; BLOCK 6, LOT. 5. BEING ONE -FOOT (1') WIDE STRIPS AS SHOWN HEREON, ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO SPOKANE COUNTY AS GENERAL COUNTY PROPERTY, TO BE DEDICATED FOR ROAD PURPOSES, AT SUCH TIME AS THE ROAD IS CONTINUED AS FULL WIDTH RIGHT OF WAY, OR UNTIL ADJACENT LANDS ARE PLATTED. NO MORE THAN ONE (1) DWELLING STRUCTURE ,SHALL BE PLACED ON ANY ONE LOT; NOR SHALL ANY LOT BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING ADDITIONAL LOTS, OWNERSHIP OR BUILDING SITES WITHOUT FIRST FILING AND RECEIVING APPROVAL OF REPLAT. SIDE YARD AND REAR YARD SETBACKS SHALL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUESTED. THE SETBACKS INDICATED ON THIS SUBDIVISION MAY BE VARIED FROM IF PROPER ZONING APPROVALS ARE OBTAINED. S T \, R 45 E, W.V., USE OF PRIVATE WELLS AND WATER SYSTEMS IS PROHIBITED. THE PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM, PURSUANT THE WATER PLAN APPROVAL BY COUNTY AND STATE HEALTH AUTHORITIES, THE LOCAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT, AND WATER PURVEYOR;' SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, AND THE SUBDIVIDER /SPONSOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR INDIVIDUAL DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE AS WELL AS FIRE PROTECTION TO EACH LOT /TRACT PRIOR TO SALE OF EACH LOT AND PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR EACH LOT. THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) IN INTEREST AGREE TO JOIN IN ANY COUNTY - APPROVED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND PAY SUCH RATES AND CHARGE AS MAY BE FIXED THROUGH PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR SERVICES OR BENEFIT OBTAINING BY THE PLANNING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTING, .MAINTAINING OR OPERATION OF STORMWATER CONTROL FACILITIES. THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) IN INTEREST AGREE TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY TO PLACE THEIR NAME(S) ON PETITION FOR THE FORMATION OF A ULID BY PETITION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW 36.94, WHICH THE PETITION INCLUDES THE OWNER(S) PROPERTY; AND FURTHER NOT TO OBJECT BY THE SIGNING OF A PROTEST PETITION AGAINST THE FORMATION OF A ULID -BY RESOLUTION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW CHAPTER 36.94 WHICH INCLUDES THE OWNER(S) PROPERTY. PROVIDED THIS CONDITION SHALL NOT PROHIBIT THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) FORM OBJECTING TO ANY ASSESSMENT(S) ON THE PROPERTY AS A RESULT OF IMPROVEMENT CALLED FOR IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FORMATION OF A ULID BY EITHER PETITION OR RESOLUTION METHOD UNDER RCW CHAPTER 36.9';• EACH NEW DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE DOUBLE-PLUMBED FOR CONNECTION TO FUTURE AREAWIDE COLLECTION SYSTEMS. SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC APPLICATION APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF PERMITS BY THE HEALTH OFFICER, THE USE OF INDIVIDUAL ON -SITE SEWERAGE SYSTEM(S) MAY BE AUTF;JRIZED. NOTE: SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS MAY BE NECESSARY EOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. ,Rig // LN �� C - IC R 'CC Q ;;'T Co covc - ;l%, 4/4-/ 7e G,, / -/ ��/ sic - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE AFORESAID OWNERS HAVING HEREUNTO SET THEIR HANDS THIS DAY OF , 1994. JAMES F ETTER -" BILLIE A. - ETTER -- GLORIA D. HEDLUND STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SPOKANE ON THIS _____ DAY OF _______ 19____, BEFORE ME PERSONALLY APPEARED JAMES F. ETTER AND BILLIE A. ETTER, HUSBAND AND WIFE KNOWN TO BE THE INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED IN AND WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THEY SIGNED SAME AS THEIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR LAST ABOVE WRITTEN. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING IN SPOKANE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SPOKANE ON THIS _____ DAY OF .__ _ , 19_.__, BEFORE ME PERSONALLY APPEARED GLORIA D. HEDLUND, A WIDOW, KNOWN TO BE THE INDIVIDUAL DESCRIBED IN AND WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT SHE SIGNED SAME AS HER FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. • WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR LAST ABOVE WRITTEN. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING IN SPOKANE ADD T f SURVEYOR'S_` CERTIFICATE__ THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE " ITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. DAVID E. SCHUMANN, RLS #22121 SPOKANE COUN - Y UTILITIES DEPARTMENT EXAMINED AND \PPROVED THIS DAY OF DIRECTOR, SPOT ANE COUNTY UTILITIES SPOKANE_COUN'Y ENGINEER__ _ __. -- EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS ___ DAY OF SPOKANE COUNEY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUVY_PLANNING DEPARTMENT__ EXAMINED AND :\PPROVED THIS _ DAY OF , 19_, DIRECTOR, SPOF;'!tiE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT S POKANE_ C O.. ! EXAMINED AND FOR SPOKANE (AUNTY HEALTH OFFICER SPOKANE C UN""Y ASSESSOR EXAMINED AND \PPROVED THIS SPOKANE COUN "Y ASSESSOR BY DEPUTY SPOKANE COUN:; Y COMMISSIONERS EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS _ DAY OF CHAIRPERSON, ;! 'OKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SPOKANE COUN I DO HEREBY ;I CHARGEABLE: / PAID THIS • SPOKANE COUN o P C/ ( ( 4/1 / 4-5 /9- / CAYL'' (17 " 1 4 1 -5: ,C; ) 0 7 ); 7 77 fri- /7()( Y TREASURER Y TREASURER BY DEPUTY HE, T' DEPARTMENT P;'ROVED THIS DAY OF - - DAY OF -- -- - -- 19- 19 19 . 19 19_ ;'.TIFY THAT ALL TAXES WHICH HAVE BEEN LEVIED AND BECOME INST THE LAND SHOWN WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION HAVE BEEN FULLY A' OF . 19 AUDITOR'S FILED FOR RECORD THIS • DAY OF AT M. IN BOOK OF PLAT AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF DEPUTY North Idaho Engineerin g 4200 West Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 Phone: (208) 667 -1171 Fax: (208) 604 -3507 06/30/94 SHEET 1 19 2 HEFTS; AUGUSTA aN Co co CO 0 in 0 0 z w CZ 60,00' -»- 30,00' 124( �--'- 18 A17 FD, RE -STEEL PIN AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #4337 FOR W 1/4 CORNER 8109180257 (NOT A PART) FD. 1/2 INCH REBAR - W /SURCAP MARKED - 'WELBORN PLS 15043' S 89'23'06' W 369.87' (M) S 89'59'11' E (R2) 370,00' (R2) S 89 W 370,27 S89'231061W __400.29' _- BLOCK L LOT 11 1' WIDE STRIP e, 0 Y\ ''N \, N 89 °56'50' W (M) 2615,78' 8' (M) S 89 °56'44' E 2615,78' (REC.) •--FD, SPOKANE COUNTY 1 1 BRASS CAP AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #2455 S89'23'06'W 0,40' 1 Cr- CS' i ts 4. o t tri P M 2: oo� • • 9r o :., 7,614 SF X92 ,, _,(0o 0 •. i o s� 13' PLANTING STRIP .,. TRACT '13' J' 26,540 SF 5.4 „ • a5 2a,�,1 6a 33 1 4 L' `. 3 W 7,739 SF p 4 9,,1 • 3 , , 63 6500 ✓ 7,409 SF 0 .. 5 9 • r NN 6 0 s 7,3B3 SF X23 • 1 g $' > o r s • 9,335 SF • KW 95. to• C 33 e. 4 �l1\ 103.63' :2 o 6,736 SF - S89'54'16'E CIO • 1 9,832 SF • ,0'L/ 5 � 0 00 • • • • 7,100 SF 77 -- I •40. 02.2 C12 C13 M ,� c t' C; \ k, .. 1 �. 1 C3/ o;,'/ 0�° } N I` e 2 11 L / r,§ 5 N 8.039 Sr (^ 18 9• . L � r,( 1 ° S C35 • 9,714 SF oo S b0 6' v C5 a 9,136 v uW 'C6 //z 2 t, 1 3 11 F. 10,062 SF 1 {tP N 6 � O • v . 164 '' 10,303 .-- JS 0115 C 2 8 ,785 SF Cr � 6 2 • 5 1 553 5 C 0 c 5 C r' C1 L...1 ,r • ?.U6' o V t ki p_..- 0' C9 9 ,122 SF 1,N .a? ro 11 •br ✓fi r 7,585 SF `TP ,1 ', 8,447 SF .t . 1 t ' C4 �$•d'� . 589•54'16' .3 � `h • • co X 103 63'c o N 1 .;, 0' o h 7,900 SF u7 .44 :589•59'58'E 100.00' tf) N yr 2 N so h, 6,521 sF hl89'S9'S8'W ® : 100,00' 3 4521 • 100, SF 00' o 6.736 SF N 11 1489'54'16'V 103.63' :g 0 0 0 5 w 4736 Sf . .1- $89'54'16'E: 103.63' 3 7 N. "6 6.736 SF W N89'54'16` 03.63' : 0 8 cbo 6.736 SF h a S89'54'16'E • 103.63' 00 nu-5 o .ate 9 CU.p 1f). • 6,736 SF " N89'54'16'\. 1 :1 � N89'54'16'N89'54'16'\.1:1 103.63' t • 10 6,736 SF ^'�D tri WA • S89'S6'S1'E N 215.00' N d ■89'59'58'W 1 zr c 4, z-. `.. tf) ^ ti 4431 SF . C14 20' a 80.02' 4s. `° � S89'56'51'E � N o 125.00' N w CU 0 o :l z n r', (1 4741 SF .-•t 89 • 70.00' w as' 25' o •b 0 n :4737 SF Q• 5 49.98' . 4'0 8 s, S8903636'E I� .. '' 50,02' SCO'00'02'W 1 S89'56051'E 36.41 120.00' 1 ® , \ 4:5 ' 'to' b.$.' L_ BLOCK 2, LOT 3 1' WIDE STRIP A P 0 O ° Z MISSION AVENUE • 8 W RTIC\ La TRACT 'A' z L42 AC ollY AVENUE BLOCK 3, LOT 5 1' WIDE STRIP S89'56'51'E 30.00' U t SP:{A\= C /--- BLOCK 5, LOT 9 / `" ^� - vC.) / 1' WIDE STRIP r i \ 1" ' . UNPLATTED FI\AL PLAT IF 80 C 10,037 SF S 1\7'39' 0 00' 6 N 0 , , S8. 958 es 18� 8 S -CTIC\ J\T Y, WA �K N26'49'17'W 53.52' ';!P' •J 2 • 7 a= 8,822 SF S gt 8 707 SF / �- N30'00'02'E 25,00' 8, T 25 N, R 45 S- I\GT :\ BLOCK 6, LOT 5 1' WIDE STRIP - FD, SPOKANE COUNTY BRAS:; CAP WITH X DN CENTERLINE DF MISSION AVENUE AS INDICATED ON SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER .RECORD #2454 FOR S 1/4 CORNER \ " ST AIDDI cQ c hc...vv,- e -Po6c) ‘i*I/vc-s � s Go � 0 ?(ci.} c� t.-- v 1) SURVEYOR'S NOTES THE RECORD INFORMATION ON THIS MAP WAS TAKEN FROM SPOKANE COUNTY RECORDS AS FOLLOWS: RECORD LABEL BOOKS OF SURVEYS: (Ri) BOOK 27, PAGE 42 (R2) BOOK 25, PAGE 83 (R3) BOOK 9, PAGE 79 (R4) BOOK 50, PAGE 27 AND SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORDS: #4337 #2455 #2454 BLOCKS 1 THROUGH 6 CONTAIN 12,73 ACRES INCLUDING ROAD RIGHT DF WAY, ' CURVE RADIUS LEN - ... C1 00,00' - _ 130.69'. - -- C2 300.00' 23,17' C3 225.00' 84.46' C4• %� 225.00' 33.35' ' 4,32 C6s 7 18,67' . 6 _25. 00 67 95 � - - - t ,,C8'," - ' 2129_86' -- • - .. 2 _ 48171' ._ - C9: 20.00' 27,55' _ _ _ 31.42' ,C11;• 250.00' 47.53' -- ' 30.13_,_ �C13 C1 20.00' _ 4 20.00' _ C15 _ 20.00' _._.. C16 20.00' _ C17 ' 2104.86' C12 - C1 750.0 _ _ C200 1 _ _ 750.00' C21_ _ _ 750.00' 750.0'." 6U0.' C24. - 60 _ 65.76 t 2Si' 600.00' 65.08' C26 __ 600,00' _ 65,19' r27'_ 650.00'' 6 5,03 ' - C28' 6,x.'.00' _ 65.03' . C29- -_- 650.00' _ .... -- - 65,03 ' -- - - C3 650.00' . 49.76' C31 '' - 2000' _ _- .- 33.66' C32 20.00' 29.67'_ _ _.. C33 2104 _- 6066' _. _ C34 20 00' ... 31,42' .. -v C35.� 20.00' 31,42' C36' 600.00' 40.16' 1... . _ _ Q37 � . _ - - -_ 265.00' 135,91'_ GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100 ft. 26,12' 31.40 3143' 31.40' _ 46,00' 7.79' _. 2,79'_ 65.09' 65.61' 45.46' BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BAS.S DF BEARING FOR THIS MAP IS THE WEST LINE DF THE SW 1/4 SECTION 8 TAKEN AS S 00 °35'03 E, TAKEN FROM R.D.S. FL -ED AT BOOK 27, PAGE 42, OF SURVEYS, SPOKANE CDUNTY WASHINC•TDN, THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED USING A PENTAX PX1OD 10 SECOND THEODOLITE WITH DN 30ARD ELECTRONIC DISTANCE METER, FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS WERE USED IN F' CCORDANCE WITH WAC 332- 130 - 90 SECTION TANGENT I _ 66.40' - 11.59' 42 73 16,71' 77 45 9,34 - 136.06' 241,89' • 20,00' 23.84' 18.75' 15.30' .. _ • 1.39' 32.57' _ 32.83' 22,74' 10.52' 32,91' 32.57' 32.63' 32.54' .. . 32.54' __ _ 16,47' _ 20.02'_ 19.98' _ _ 23.00' 3.90' - 24.89' .. . 22.38' 18.32' 3 0.33' 20.00' 20,00' 20.09' 69.48' 40,15' ACCURACY STATEMENT 2828'. N CHOR i BEARING . 1 DELTA 129.66' . _ . S76 24'57'35' 2316' N62 12 46'E I 04 25'29 _ N19'14'47'W21 30 23' SO4'14'47'E 08'29'37' _ S2'S4 12'11'4 ' - 18.67 - S17'03'58E -.. 01 28' 2' - - 2.4'33'49'. _ _ __ .90 _ _ S28 36 37 E _ 265 480.68' S69'20'4 'W „ 12'57'31' S6 9'27[E.�W 78'55'59' 00'02'E _ 90'00'00' S24 33 11'E 10 53'34' 1 ___•_ 27.36' S62'15'37'E 86'18'25' _ . _._. _ _ 0 •_._N \.." _ _ 0 _ 3. . 28,22: , 65,07' N27'18'00'W - .-- ---6 N32'17'39'W S3V01'34'E 05'43'55'H N64'46'18'E 01'39'04' 60 66' 28.28' N74 59 58 W 29 23 04 AUDITOR"S _CERTIFICATE__ FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF __, 19 , THE - 12 - EbUE§T OF DEPUTY LEGEND SET 5/8 INCH REBAR W/ RED CAP RLS #22121, OR AS NOTED • SET 1/2 INCH REBAR W/ RED CAP RLS #22121, OR AS NOTED FD. MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED of OR 24)•= FD, CONTROLLING SECTION CORNER OR 1/ 4 CORNER AS DESCRIBED 0 CALCULATED POINT - NOTHING SET B.S, BUILDING SETBACK A SET 5/8 INCH REBAR W/ 2 INCH ALUMINUM CAP MARKED RLS #22121 FOR CENTERLINE MONUMENT North Idaho Engineering 4200 West Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 (206) 667-1171 Fax: (208) 664-3507 North Idaho Engineering 4200 West Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 Phone: (208) 667-1173. Fax: (208) 664 -3507 04/07/94 \GENE/JR -D/4e SHEET 1 DEDICATION KNOW BY ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT JAMES F. ETTER AND BILLIE A. ETTER, 'HUSBAND AND WIFE AND GLORIA D. HEDLUND, A WIDOW, HAS CAUSED TO BE PLATTED INTO LOTS, BLOCKS AND STREETS, THE LAND SHOWN HEREON, TO BE KNOWN AS RIVERWAY VILLA FIRST ADDITION, BEING A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE COUNTY OF. SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE WEST HALF OF THE 'SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST, W.M.,: EXCEPTING COUNTY ROADS ON THE WEST 30 FEET AND SOUTH 20 FEET; AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING 4 TRACTS: (1 OF 4) THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6 LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5, 450 FEET SOUTH. OF THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION, 330 FEET; THENCE NORTH 8116' EAST, 990.5 FEET; THENCE NORTH 63'49' EAST, 685.8 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55'52' EAST, 762.2 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 6, SAID POINT BEING 425.3 FEET NORTH OF THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 8; (2 OF 4) THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE NORTH 00'00'49" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 8, A DISTANCE OF 959.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'59'11" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION, SAID POINT BEING ` THE EAST LINE OF BARKER ROAD; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89'59'11" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 370.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00'00'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 650.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'59'11" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 370.00 FEET 'TnThe EAST LINE OF BARKER ROAD; THENCE SOUTH. 00'00'49" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID BARKER ROAD, A DISTANCE OF'650.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON. (3 OF 4) BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5,-1809 FEET NORTH-OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE EAST 30 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE EAST 200 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 5, 200 FEET; THENCE WEST 200' FEET TO A POINT 30 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH SAID WEST LINE AND 30 FEET EAST THEREOF 200 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON. (4 OF 41 A PORTION OF SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP, 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST ONE- QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST; THENCE SOUTH 00'35'03" EAST, ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 8, A DISTANCE OF 450.00 FEET; THENCE PERPENDICULAR TO SAID WEST LINE NORTH 8924'57" EAST A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF BARKER ROAD THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, BY STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 25, 1988 UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 8808250252, THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 89'24'57" EAST A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 80'40'57" EAST A DISTANCE OF 434.35. FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE, SOUTH 66'24'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 349.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 34'24'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 190.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 85'35'03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 300.00 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF BARKER ROAD; THENCE NORTH 00'35'03" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH ONE- QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE NORTH 01'31'46" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 1333.32 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING MARKED BY AN IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE CONTINUING 01'31'46" ALONG- SAID EAST LINE 1333.32 FEET TO THE CENTER QUARTER OF SAID SECTION BEING MARKED BY AN IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP; _ Go VeNA0A 5 Q /A pRft(Nt - 6- L od c s) I 3LckLs) Ape (ocA -4ep o►ti' 16-,M po RAP-1 C v L - de - SA-c_ 76Tub Tbz) D - its * TUI. Pz g- -. [ ? Rc) r:e 2{ l ufog_ Go NNect - G c (6 fit ',011rQ6 OK 0660 ;rv..( - : , : A`� .4 i-op 4 " /11)D 7 Crec �tC&) & (DS dtC7/- 1; ' The CaMme&/ IRCcfs vFvowN Gw 'TA6 p!(/ f ARC l e(2-66 '`( cieciccM- 10 Ike Ct ion,c; ow A'S Soc r At CR6A 4e:A loc. dvc -4 RC- carcD&J D�+•tc UNcic' E S i 4-fe i he coth/nc,v& F}2c'/1 -5 CAfuruok be St,t oR'TRAtt6 J A.. 1 I �'=° .... t'Tt*?Amr ^inn � ..." W ,1740 `t (ock 5 . 5 Loc K Co p Co c K. 3 Rti C0-k S $c-ack Q Z >-vuv3 beP WA A PORTIO\ OF T THENCE NORTH 01'32'54: WEST 425.52 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH BRASS CAP; THENCE SOUTH 56'21'18" WEST 763.74 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH BRASS CAP; THENCE SOUTH 6313'05" WEST 685.80 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH BRASS CAP; THENCE SOUTH 81'41'21" WEST 556.19 FEET TO AN IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 66'24'10" WEST 349.28 FEET TO AN IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 34'24'05" WEST 189.95 FEET TO AN IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 85'34'07" WEST 300.10 FEET TO AN IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 00'33'55" EAST 183.72 FEET TO. AN IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 89'25'19" EAST 200.02 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE SOUTH 00'35'22" EAST 199.97 FEET TO AN IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 89'23'24" EAST 170.13 FEET TO AN IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 00'34'05" EAST 650.17 FEET TO AN IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 89'23'06" 'WEST 369.88 FEET TO AN IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 00'35'05" EAST 939.26 FEET-TO AN IRON ROD ON THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BARKER ROAD AND THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF MISSION AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 89'56'50 EAST ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF MISSION AVENUE 1931.58 FEET TO AN IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE DEPARTING SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 0117'37" WEST 1310.31 FEET TO AN IRON ROD NTH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 89'48'00" EAST 648.40 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SP <A\ AND THEY HEREBY DEDICATE TO PUBLIC USE FOREVER THE STREETS AND ROADS SHOWN WITHIN THIS PLAT. NO MORE THAN ONE (1) DWELLING STRUCTURE SHALL BE PLACED ON ANY ONE LOT; NOR SHALL ANY LOT BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING ADDITIONAL LOTS, OWNERSHIP OR BUILDING SITES WITHOUT FIRST FILING AND RECEIVING APPROVAL OF REPLAT. SIDE YARD AND REAR YARD SETBACKS SHALL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUESTED. THE SETBACKS INDICATED ON THIS SUBDIVISION MAY BE VARIED FROM IF PROPER ZONING APPROVALS ARE OBTAINED. USE OF PRIVATE WELLS AND WATER SYSTEMS IS PROHIBITED. THE PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM, PURSUANT THE WATER PLAN APPROVAL BY COUNTY AND STATE HEALTH AUTHORITIES, THE LOCAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT, AND WATER PURVEYOR, SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, AND THE SUBDIVIDER /SPONSOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR INDIVIDUAL DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE AS WELL AS FIRE PROTECTION TO EACH LOT /TRACT PRIOR TO SALE OF EACH LOT AND PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR EACH LOT. THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) IN INTEREST AGREE TO JOIN IN ANY COUNTY- APPROVED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND PAY SUCH RATES AND CHARGE AS MAY BE FIXED THROUGH PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR SERVICES OR BENEFIT OBTAINING BY THE PLANNING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTING, MAINTAINING OR OPERATION OF STORMWATER CONTROL FACILITIES. THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) IN INTEREST AGREE TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY TO PLACE THEIR NAME(S) ON PETITION FOR THE FORMATION OF ULID BY PETITION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW 36.94, WHICH THE PETITION INCLUDES THE OWNER(S) PROPERTY; AND FURTHER NOT TO OBJECT BY THE SIGNING OF A PROTEST PETITION 2 c, Ofg c� SS oF A k y p R o v L b r; ion SPkAlr Co [( i S V r 13Loc k 1 -If Cu L-46,- -SAK_ a VILLA FI S ADDITION sw 1/ FI\ Lot __- Lock be 0 eCt Foot c1DC - !i S T IQ IPS R s Show }v ket.eo t' eReb-' ded tc P , Spo I� ArJ Covry A- 5 S 6 J Rfl-(_ cc,u�, opPP d e cl �c R 1 Fv � @D / D P u � (�o S� Q ev e / � � � 1 t n-,e U A-d o+ NL - n e ` Ucc r G � � E W Q2 AL PLAT OF SECTIO U \TY WAS EACH NEW DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE DOUBLE- PLUMBED FOR CONNECTION TO FUTURE AREAWIDE COLLECTION SYSTEMS. SUBJECT TO SPECIFY APPLICATION APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF PERMITS BY THE HEALTH OFFICER, THE USE OF INDIVIDUAL ON -SITE SEWERAGE SYSTEM(S) MAY BE AUTHORIZED. NOTE: SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION . REQUIREMENTS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. 3 poubLc , �� 5yGfem w 1 LL n' bE ct6 PrkJ/4 i (-r4 e I�n2 e z e , v o lis k e O e tZ(I j A ti0'T - PdcvOWL ' Roce )I tc toe Rov -to eAck SIN INESS WHEREOF, THE AFORESAID OWNERS HAVING HEREUNTO SET THEIR HANDS .r C THIS DAY OF , 1994. 0�� �I ( p� ./ JAMES F. ETTER `-% ivcC' A (� O - LL 1 Fco`k 5ritt AtJ St■w of P \Ack SPokA toe, CovW is he‘zeby coeR j4 c file RAG oF ING R►vd , (29 pe5S -b A-kt Cc;Mfi fi ReRs pjoe P-I -\ N,1 -C e McAr s BILLIE A. E I I B R GLORIA D. HEDLUND STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SPOKANE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SPOKANE AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS AT M. IN BOOK REQUEST OF T 25\ R 45 I \GT \ AGAINST THE FORMATION OF ULID BY RESOLUTION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW CHAPTER 36.94 WHICH INCLUDES THE OWNER(S) PROPERTY. PROVIDED THIS CONDITION SHALL NOT PROHIBIT THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) FORM OBJECTING TO ANY ASSESSMENT(S) ON THE PROPERTY AS A RESULT OF IMPROVEMENT CALLED FOR IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FORMATION OF A ULID BY EITHER PETITION OR RESOLUTION METHOD UNDER RCW CHAPTER 36.94. ON THIS DAY OF , 19 . BEFORE ME PERSONALLY APPEARED JAMES F. ETTER AND BILLIE A. ETTER, HUSBAND AND WIFE KNOWN TO BE THE INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED IN AND WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THEY SIGNED SAME AS THEIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR LAST ABOVE WRI I I LN. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING IN SPOKANE ON THIS DAY OF - , 19 , BEFORE ME - - PERSONALLY APPEARED GLORIA D. HEDLUND, A WIDOW, KNOWN TO BE THE INDIVIDUAL DESCRIBED IN AND WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT SHE SIGNED SAME AS HER FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR LAST ABOVE WRI I I EN. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING IN SPOKANE DAY OF , 19 OF PLAT AT PAGE AT THE DEPUTY CC 0 INDIANA AVE. BALDWIN AVE. AUGUSTA AVE. MISSION AVE. w W. U VICINITY MAP (NO _SC • w PROJECT AREA p12 1o SURVEYOR' `CERTIFICATE THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANC': DAVID E. .3 '1- jMANN, RLS #22121 SPOKANE r )LNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT EXAMINED / NC APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 19 . DIRECTOR, :'POKANE COUNTY UTILITIES SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER EXAMINED A'D APPROVED THIS ___ DAY OF 19 . SPOKANE CCUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT EXAMINED A' D APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 19__. DIRECTOR, .,OUNTY )EPARTMENT SPOKANE_ '( JNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT EXAMINED .A. APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 19 . FOR SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 19_. SPOKANE • "'OUNTY ASSESSOR BY DEPUTY SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 19. CHAIRPEF'SON, SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SPOKA N: COUNTY TREASURER I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL TAXES WHICH HAVE BEEN LEVIED AND BECOME CHARGEABLE AGAINST THE LAND SHOWN WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION HAVE BEEN FULLY PAID TH;S DAY OF , 19 . SPOKA E COUNTY TREASURER BY DEPUTY a KA NC Cov N t*0 Cz ELc Recce 4 _* ( ).) - Ose - 7703 - - 0 P &5 Vii/94/ P° KBE Coo O'\-) RECEIVED APR 1 k 199k SPOKANE COUNTY.ENGINEEOE 3 HEETS1 FD. 5/8 INCH REBAR W /SURCAP MARKED 'VALENTINE PLS 18741' CENTERLINE BARKER ROAD = WEST LINE I' SECTION 8 S 00.35'03' E CR1) ETL 'A° (NO SCALE) FD, 3/8 INCH REBAR W\ SURCAP MARKED 'ADAMS PLS 18741' 30' 40 I 45 FD. 5/8 INCH REBAR W /SURCAP MARKED 'VALENTINE PLS 18741' 10' RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION (SEE DETAIL 'A' ABOVE) FD, 1/2 INCH REBAR W\ SURCAP MARKED 'ADAMS PLS 18741' FD. 1/2 INCH REBAR W /SURCAP MARKED 'WELBORN PLS 15043' N 8 5 . 35'03' W (R4) OQ 0' CR4) N 8 5 . 34'07' W (M) 300.10' (M) 10' RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION 5' RESF�R�/ED6 ' ACQUISITION AREA S 00'35'03' E 182,40' 200.02' CM) S 89'25'19' W EAST <R3) 200,00' (R3) 00.00' CR4) ATE LOCATI❑ AL TRAIL 0127 ART> (R' EAST (R3) 200.00' (R3) M• v M a53 z� OTHERS x a u JEST (R3) 200,00' (R3SM) INDIANA BALDWIN �KA APP o :. CENTEN 00 #911 o (N A N NC 8 5 . 3 5'03' 00 0.0' CR4) w _N 8 5'34'07' W (M) 300.10' 04) v R ^ M AU GUST \ N -Pd- 200,02' 04) N 89'25'19' E N 89 ' E 04) 370.13'(4) N 89'59'11' W CR2) 370.00' CR2) *8109180257 (NOT A PART) S 89'59'11' E CR2) 370.00' CR2) S •89�'c'3'.Q6' W • 369..5a' (M)• — • •• • FD. 1/2 INCH 10' RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION 5' RES VED ACQUI TION AREA 170.13' sce 5 D.`5/8 INCH REBAR W /SURCAP MARKED 'VALENTINE PLS 18741' FD. 1/2 INCH I.P. FD. SPOKANE COUNTY RASS CAP AS PER COUNTY RECORD #2455 e FD. RE -STEEL PIN AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #4337 FOR W 1/4 CORNER RP's \ - c2 ( Q ( FD. 1/2 -r{ REPAIR V /SURCA =' MARKED 'WELBOR1 PLS 15043' D. 1/2 INNCH REBAR W /SURCAP MARKED 'WELB ❑RN PLS 15043' S 89'56'44' E 2615.78' CREC.) / :. _ ..• ..�""�- • 556.15 N 81 .87'57' E (R4) 556.19' CM) S 80•41'21' W FD. 5/8 INCH REBAR W /SURCAP MARKED 'VALENTINE' PLS 18741' WAY VII N 89 E 2571.49' (MEAS.) S 89'32'31' W 2571.48' CREC.) LOT L BLOCK 7 (FUTURE DEVELOPMENT) _ • . ;# I f� u $ 2615.78' CM) A P RTI \ -P T 0 4 4° 5 6 MINIM OMNI FD. 4 INCH X 4 INCH CONC, POST W /BRASS CAP MARKED I.E.P. 10' RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION 10' Ru;9.,NeD ACQUISITION AREA SP /1\ L SW 1/ <A\F C FI\AL PLAT ) / / q S > l6 3 Z <*3 ti13' FD. 4 INCH X 4 INCH CONC. POST W /BRASS CAP MARKED I.E.P. N 89'48'00' E 648.40' OMAN OTHERS (NOT A PART) S 89'48'01' W 648.40' (R1) S 89'56'44' E 653.95'(R1) '--- S 89 E 653.95' O�n N N 1 co in N. o 'r N N • � 7. SECTI:\ 8, T 25 \, R \TY, W =\ FD. 4 INCH X 4 INCH CONC, POST W /BRASS CAP MARKED I.E.P. FD. 4 INCH X 4 INCH / CONC. POST W /BRASS CAP MARKED I.E,P. ON NORTH SIDE OF THIS POINT (SEE DETAIL 'B' AT RIGHT) 01 0 N 3 3 co o z z FD. 1/2 INCH REBAR W /SURCAP MARKED ABC INC. 7317/13315 AS INDICATED ON INSTRUMENT # 8205030155 North Idaho Engineering 4200 West Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 Phone: (208) 667 -1 171 Fax: (208) 664 -3507 f*/ ST ADDI 5 FD. SPOKANE COUNTY BRASS CAP WITH X ON CENTERLINE OF MISSION AVENUE AS INDICATED ON SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #2454 FOR S 1/4 CORNER R p ''5 Pee- co W 1) BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS MAP IS THE WEST LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 8 TAKEN AS S 00'35'03' E, TAKEN FROM R.O.S. FILED AT BOOK 27, PAGE 42, OF SURVEYS, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGT ❑N. ACCURACY STATEMENT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED USING A PENTAX PX1OD 10 SECOND THEODOLITE WITH ON BOARD ELECTRONIC DISTANCE METER. FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS WERE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WAC 332- 130 -90 SECTION 'C'. ecc/ 7? SURVEYOR'S NOTES THE RECORD INFORMATION ON THIS MAP WAS TAKEN FROM SPOKANE COUNTY RECORDS AS FOLLOWS' RECORD LABEL BOOKS OF SURVEYS' (R1) BOOK 27, PAGE 42 (R2) BOOK 25, PAGE 83 (R3) BOOK 9, PAGE 79 (R4) BOOK 50, PAGE 27 AND SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORDS; #4337 #2455 #2454 THE AREA OF THE SUBDIVISION IS 116.6± ACRES LEGEND 0 FD. MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED R >• OR n®a FD. CONTROLLING SECTION CORNER OR 1/4 CORNER AS DESCRIBED O CALCULATED POINT - NOTHING SET 4'X4' CONC. POST'V /BRASS CAP „ARKED LE.P. • SET 1/2 INCH REBAR W/ YELLOW CAP RLS #22121, OR AS NOTED GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 200 ft. RECEIVED APR 1 4 1994 SPOKANE C411N'TY NGINEEB d4 /OV94 V3ENBAAM DW6 30,00'7 BALDWIN 60.00' 1 — 30,00' - - I j. L _ 10,00' 11•;- 40,00' 7 #8109180857 (NOT A PART) S 89'23'06' W 369,88' (M) S 89 °59'11' E (R2) 370,00' (R2) FD. 1/2 INCH REBAR W /SURCAP MARKED 'WELBORN PLS 15043' S89'23'06'W 400.29' S89'23'06'W 355.30' Acci` ?-4 VE FD, RE -STEEL PIN AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #4337 FOR W 1/4 CORNER VED ACQITSITION AVEA S 89 °56'44' E 2615,78' (REC,) FD. SPOKANE COUNTY BRASS CAP AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #2455 103,63' 1k g A v_ 14303 SF , C1. — A -...�• i .189 °23'06'E 0,39' 2 �m 7,393 sr ,' \ L WAY VILLA 103.63' 6.736 SF 1,0 N89'54'16'W • 103.63' S89'54'16'E 673 SF 103.63' 1 � 67 SF .0 0 3� N89'54'16`W 103,63' to 0 0 • 0 0 . CD 67 SF 0 0 • ! og �, �•- K . 6.736 SF N89'54'16'W v, 103.63' N89053 '16'W N00'00'02'E� 36.41' (ya ,p0 S✓ 4 W l0 7,900 SF T o S89'59'58'E F U) N89'59'58'W 4 coma 80,02' C14 S89'56'51'E 125.00' 1 to N 6,741 SF X89'59'58" 70.00' W 25' :sr.) 2 0 `+: 6.737 SF r G 50,02 1'E 0 0 t 0 z 11.110•11 ilMNO MISSION AVENUE A P RTI \ _F T TRACT 'A' 62,032 SF S89'5671'E 215.00' JG�UG R(r 7 AVENUE - S89 °56'51'E 30.00' OPE awl. am SP F - I \ E SW 1/4, SECTID\ �A \= c: \TY, v/AS co LOT L BLOCK 7 (SEE SHEET 2 OF 3) s • 967 SF 3 / �3 tx ce ( 2) % r' N26 °49'17'\/ f 53.52' 4(5- 0 �� 9' %161# s9's8. 1, 8 AL PLAT �- N30 °00'02'E 25,00' FD, SPOKANE COUNTY BRASS CAP WITH X ON CENTERLINE DF MISSION AVENUE AS INDICATED ON SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #2454 FOR S 1/4 CORNER 8, T 85 \, R 45 E, W,M,, I \GTII\ 54 , T SURVEYOR'S NOTES THE RECORD INFORMATION ON THIS MAP WAS TAKEN FROM SPOKANE COUNTY RECORDS AS FOLLOWS' BOOKS OF SURVEYS' BOOK 27, PAGE 42 BOOK 25, PAGE 83 BOOK 9, PAGE 79 BOOK 50, PAGE 27 RECORD LABEL (R1) (R2) (R3) (R4) AND SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORDS' #4337 #2455 #2454 BLOCKS 1 6 CONTAIN INCLUDING ROAD THROUGH IGHT OF WAY12,73 ACRES 21V0cl'k1H ` CURVE 1 RADIUS 1 C1 300,00' C2 300.00' C3 225.00' C4 225.00' C5 725.00' C6 725.00' C7 625.00' C8 2129.86' C9 20,00' C10 20,00' C11 250,00' C12 20,00' C13 20,00' C14 20.00' C15 20.00' C16 20.00' C17 2104,86' C18 700.00' C19 750.00' C20 750,00' C21 750,00' C22 750,00' C23 600,00' C24 60`,.00' C25 600.00' ' — C28 600.00' C27 650.00' C28 650,00' C29 650.00' C30 650,00' C31 20,00' C32 20.00' C33 2104.86' C34 20.00' C35 20.00' C36 600,00' C37 265.00' \\ cs AN olcak- xr1cm k r 5 Loc k CD 1 Fo s tAovLcl ■o \ Q 1) ecj, \c A i k n Ai 1 c AS u L-cfi 5 S� Cc, P-tk)5 P- st p AD DITTO N GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100 ft. LENGTH 1 130.69' 23,17' 84,46' 33,35' 154,32' 18.67' 267.95' 481.71' 27,55' 31,42' 47.53' 30,13' 26,12' 31.40' 31.43' 31.40' 46.00' 7.79' 2.79' 65.09' 65.61' 45.46' 21.04' 65.76' 65.08' 65,19' 65.03' 65.03' 65,03' 49.76' 33,66' 29,67' 60,66' 31.42' 31.42' 40,16' 135.91' BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BASIS DF BEARING FOR THIS S 00°35'03' 1 EW T AKEN FROM THE SW 1/4 DF SECTION 8 TAKEN AS R.D.S. FILET AT BOOK 27, PAGE 42, OF SURVEYS, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTONJ CV RD 1 BEARING 1 DELTA 129.66' S76•54'18'W 24'57'35' 23.16' N62'12'46'E 04'25'29' 83.96' N19'14'47'W 21'30'23' 33.32' SO4'14'47`E 08'29'37' 154,03' S23'54'06'E 12'11'44' 18.67' S17'03'581E 01'28'32' 265.90' S28'36137'E 24'33'49' 480.68' S69'20'48'1.4 12'57'31' 25,43' S69'27158`E 78'55'59' 28.28' N15'00'02`E 90'00'00' 47.46' S24'33'll'E 10'53'34' 27.36' S62'15137'E 86'18'25' 24.30' S37'25'01'W 74'49'58' 28.27' N44'58'25'W 89'56'52' 28,30' N45'01'35'E 90'03'08' 28.27' S44'58'25'E 89'56'52' 46,00' S73'57'36'W 01'15'08' 7,79' N29•40'51'W 00'38'15' 2.79' N29'53'35'W 00'12'47' 65.07' N27'18'00'W 05'00'22' 65.59' N22'18'27'W 45.45' S18'03'54'E 03'28'22' 21.04' S17'20'00'E 02'00'34' 65,73' S21'28'40`E 06'16'46' 65.05' S27'43'30'E 06 °12'54' C33 56'41 65.15' 'E 06'13'29' 65.00' JJ l r : •3 _ 4'� CJ 65.00' N32'17'39'W 05'43'55' 65.00' N26'33'44'W 05'43'55' 49.74' N21'30'12'W 04'23'09' 29.82' N67'31'19'W 96'25'23' 27.02' N21'27'081E 84'59'16' 60.66' N64'46'18'E 01'39'04' 28.28' N74'59'58'W 90'00'00' 28.28' N15'00'02'E 90'00'00' 40.15' N38'58'29'W 03'50'06' 134,42' S74'41134'W 29'23'04' TANGENT 1 66.40' 11.59' 42.73' 16.71' 77.45' 9.34' 136,06' 241.89' 16.47' 20,00' 23.84' 18.75' 15.30' 19.98' 20.02' 19.98' 23.00' 3,90' 1.39' 32.57' 32,83' 22.74' 10.52' 32.91' 32.57' 32.63' 32.54' 32.54' 32.54' 24.89' 22,38' 18.32' 30.33' 20,00' 20,00' 20,09' 69.48' ACCURACY STATEMENT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED USING A PEN TAX FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS I WERE WITH ON BO +RD ELECTRONIC DISTANCE METER, USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WAC 332- 130 - 90 SECTION 'C'. North Idaho Engineering 4200 West Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 63814 Phone: (208) 667 -1171 Fax: (208) 664 -3507 LEGEND SET 1/2 INCH REBAR W/ YELLOW CAP RLS #22121, DR AS NOTED FD, MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED DR . FD. CONTROLLING SECTION CORNER OR 1/4 CORNER AS DESCRIBED 0 CALCULATED POINT - NOTHING SET B.S. BUILDING SETBACK A CENTERLINE MONUMENT RECEIVED APR 1 4 1894 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEE$ O O,kt4 THENCE SOUTH 89'56'51' EAST REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 00'00'02' EAST REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 89'56'51" EAST REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 00'00'02" EAST REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 89'56'51" EAST REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 42'29'21" EAST REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 59'59'58' EAST REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 30'00'02" EAST REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AND WELCO GROUP, INCORPORATED, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, HAS CAUSED TO BE PLATTED INTO LOTS, TRACTS AND STREETS, NE LAND SHOWN HEREON, TO BE KNOWN HENCEFORTH AS NE RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; A PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP L/ 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST, WILLAMLI MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE NORTH 00' 35'03" WEST 873.95 FEET ALONG NE WEST UNE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH 89'24'57" EAST 30.00 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY UNE OF BARKER ROAD, MARKED BY A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP, THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH '89'24'57' EAST 15.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR MTH PLASTIC' CAP; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS, NON TANGENT CURVE WHICH IS CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 7.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2027'23" AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 09'38'39" EAST 7.10 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE DEPARTING THE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED CURVE ALONG A NON- TANGENT UNE NORTH 89'23'06' EAST 245.23 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 758.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE WHICH IS CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 109.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0815'34' TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH !PLASTIC CAP; THENCE DEPARTING THE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED CURVE ALONG A NON- TANGENT LINE SOUTH 29'56'26" EAST 215.80 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 00'00'04" WEST 686.49 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY UNE OF MISSION AVENUE WHICH IS MARKED` BY A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY SOUTH 89'56'50" EAST 173.60 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE DEPARTING SAID RIGHT OF WAY NORTH 00'03'10" EAST 10.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS, NON - TANGENT CURVE WHICH IS CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.40 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89'56'52" AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 44'58'24" WEST '28.27 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 00'00'02' EAST 95.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THEN ALONG THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE WHICH. IS CC;NCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.43 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9012'08" TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE DEPARTING THE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED CURVE ALONG A NON- TANGENT UNE NORTH 00'02'29' WEST 50.00 FtL I TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; 50.02 FEET TO A ,1 /2 INCH 195.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH 30.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH 180.42 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH 215.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH 89.99 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH 182.52 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH 25.00 htti TO A 1/2 INCH THENCE NORTH 59'59'58" WEST 102.02 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 26'49'17" WEST 53.52 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 49'06'28' EAST 185.43 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF' A 600.00 FOOT RADIUS, NON- TANGENT CURVE WHICH IS CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE ` OF 40.16 FEET THROUGH ''A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03'50'06" AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 38'58'29" WEST '140.15 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE DEPARTING THE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED CURVE ALONG A NON- TANGENT UNE NORTH 52'56'34' EAST 150.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR VATH PLASTIC' CAP; THENCE NORTH 27'41'51" WEST 145.73 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 22'41'20" WEST 149.19 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 29'59'58" WEST 290.98 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP HERINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "POINT A "; THENCE SOUTH 60'00'02" WEST 508.04 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 672.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE WHICH IS CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.73 THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20'05'55' AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS SOUTH 70'02'59" WEST TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; c. Yi A PORTION OF THE S 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4, SECTION SPOKANE CEUNTY, WAS -INGT 5 � ��' THENCE DEPARTING NE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED CURVE ALONG A ■ 0- NON- TANGENT UNE SOUTH 00'34'05" EAST 16.81 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; Q THENCE SOUTH 89'23'06" WEST 369.88 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY UNE OF BARKER ROAD WHICH IS MARKED BY A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF 'WAY UNE SOUTH 00'35'03 EAST 84.98 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. FINAL - WALK FI CONTAINING 13.80 ACRES MORE OR LESS. TOGETHER V9N AN EASEMENT FOR A TEMPORARY TURNAROUND AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, T. 25 N., R. 45 E., W.M., MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE AFOREMENTIONED "POINT A', BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS TURNAROUND AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT; THENCE NORTH 29'59'58" WEST 37.00 FEET; THENCE NO 'f 60'00'02" EAST 123.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29'59'58" EAST 160.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 60'00'0 WEST 123.50 FEET; e 4 THENCE NORTH 29'59'58' WEST 123.00 FLEI TO THE TRUE POINT OF fit ?)' B IN� r % VDU \'S �� �� �� f' SAID(TRMPORATj TURNAROUND AND-DRAINAGE EASEMENT IS HEREBY GRANTED SPO{k4NE- COUNTY UNTIL SUCH TIME AS I S'CONTINUED AS A FULL WIDTH RIGHT OF WAY AND DEDICATED TO SPOKANE COUNTY AS A PUBUC ROAD RIGHT • OF WAY, AT WHICH TIME THE TEMPORARY TURNAROUND AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT WILL BE VACA B. "r -6ernlrvR� BE IT FURTHER KNOWN THAT THE OWNERS AS SHOWN HEREON DO HEREBY DEDICATE TO PUBLIC USE FOREVER THE STREETS AND ROADS SHOWN WITHIN THIS PLAT. TRACT "Y" BEING PRIVATE ROADS ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION CREATED BY DOCUMENT RECORDED UNDER STATE UBI NUMBER TRACTS "G ", "I ", "J ° , AND "K" BEING ONE -FOOT (1') :WIDE STRIPS AS SHOWN HEREON, ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO SPOKANE COUNTY AS GENERAL COUNTY PROPERTY, TO BE DEDICATED FOR ROAD PURPOSES AT SUCH 11ME AS THE ROAD IS CONTINUED AS FULL WIDTH RIGHT OF WAY, OR UNTIL ADJACENT LANDS ARE PLATTED. THE PRIVATE ROADS, AS SHOWN HEREON ARE EASEMENTS WHICH PROVIDE A MEANS OF INGRESS AND ' )RESS FOR THOSE LOTS WITHIN THE PLAT HAVING FRONTAGE THEREON. LOTS 11, 1 2 9,30 AND 37 ARE LOCATED ON A TEMPO2AR CUL -DE- SAC /SIT.IB' (�� ROAD. S TEMPpRARY CUL -DE- SAC /TUB ROAD MAY B�DED TO PROVIDE ACCESS J TO A ACENT OPERTY .t&`ID /OR C�NECT TO EXISTIN,VROADS OR NEW ADS AS / DE LOPMENT" AND / OR CIS :GULATION NEEDS DICTATE/ hti EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE FOR DRAINAGE. UTILITIES, SIDEWALKS, AND SLOPE EASEMENTS AS SPECIFIED. EASEMENTS FOR SIDEWALKS, SLOPE AND DRAINAGE ARE ^) HEREBY GRANTED TO THE RIVERWAU4 OWNERS ASSOCIATION. EASEMENTS FOR v U11U11ES ARE HEREBY GRANTED TO SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. EASEMENTS FOR SIGHT TRIANGLES ARE HEREBY GRANTED TO SPOKANE COUNTY. IaJ THE PRIVATE ROADS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE SEPARArE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AS RECORDED 199_ UNDER AUDITOR'S DOCUMENT NO WHICH BY REFERENCE IS MADE A PART HEREOF. THE COMMON AREAS TRACTS 'A" AND 'B" SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION. THE PRIVATE ROADS, LANDSCAPE STRIPS, AND COMMON AREAS SHALL NOT BE SOW OR TRANSFERRED, REGARDLESS OF ANY PROVISIONS IN THE COVENANTS TO THE CONTRARY WITHOUT EXPRFcS APPROVAL BY SPOKANE COUNTY, AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED SUBSERVENT ESTATES FOR TAX PURPOSES TO THE OTHER LOTS CREATED HEREIN. G IIR ACTS "C ", 'D "E', AND "H ARE THIRTEEN FOOT (13') WDE LANDSCAPE STRIPS AND TRACT "F" IS A FIVE FOOT (5') WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION. SPOKANE COUNTY IS HEREBY GRANTED THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS TO ALL PRIVATE ROADS, LANDSCAPE AREAS, COMMON AREAS AND /OR DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. NO MORE THAN ONE (1) DWELLING STRUCTURE SHALL BE PLACED ON ANY ONE LOT; NOR SHALL ANY LOT BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING ADDITIONAL LOTS, OWNERSHIP OR BUILDING SITES WITHOUT FIRST FLUNG AND RECEIVING APPROVAL OF REPLAT , SIDE YARD AND REAR YARD SETBACKS SHALL BE DETERMINED AT THE 11ME OF BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUESTED. THE SETBACKS INDICATED ON THIS SUBDIVISION MAY BE VARIED FROM IF PROPER ZONING APPROVALS ARE OBTAINED. USE OF PRIVATE WELLS AND WATER SYSTEMS IS PROHIBITED. THE PUBUC WA I EX SYSTEM, PURSUANT NE WATER PLAN APPROVAL BY COUNTY AND STATE HEALTH AUTHORITIES,' - THE LOCAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, 'COUNTY .BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT, AND WATER PURVEYOR, SHALL BE INSTAI LED WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, AND' THE - SUBDIVIDER /SPONSOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR - INDIVIDUrAL'DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE AS WELL AS FIRE PROTECTION TO EACH LOT/TRACT PRIOR TO SALE OF EACH LOT AND PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR EACH LOT. THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) IN INTEREST AGREE TO JOIN IN ANY COUNTY - APPROVED STORMWATER'MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND PAY SUCH RATES AND CHARGE AS MAY BE FIXED THROUGH PUBUC HEARINGS FOR SERVICES OR BENEFIT OBTAINING BY NE PLANNING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTING, MAINTAINING OR OPERATION OF STORMWATER CONTROL FACIUTIES. THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) IN INTEREST AGREE TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY TO PLACE THEIR NAME(S) ON PETITION FOR THE FORMATION OF UUD BY PETITION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW 36.94,, WHICH THE PETITION INCLUDES THE OWNER(S) PROPERTY; AND FURTHER NOT TO OBJECT BY THE SIGNING OF A PROTEST PETITION AGAINST THE FORMATION OF UUD BY RESOLUTION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW CHAPTER 36.94 WHICH INCLUDES THE OWNER(S) PROPERTY. ` PROVIDED THIS CONDITION SHALL NOT PROHIBIT THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) FORM OBJECTING TO ANY ASSESSMENT(S) ON THE PROPERTY AS A RESULT OF IMPROVEMENT CALLED FOR IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FORMATION OF A UUD BY EITHER PETITION OR RESOLUTION METHOD UNDER RCW CHAPTER 36.94. A'PUBUC SEWER SYSTEM WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR THE PLAT AND INDIVIDUAL SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED TO EACH LOT PRIOR TO SALE. - USE OF INDIVIDUAL ON SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS SHALL NOT BE 'AUTHORIZED. AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT BY SPOKANE COUNTY OR SUCH OTHER MUNICIPALITY ASSERTING JURISDICTION OVER THE PROPERTY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING, THE DEVELOPER OR HIS SUCCESSORS SHALL PAY IN CASH TO THE CENTRAL VAI 1 FY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 356 THE SUM OF SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($750) FOR EACH NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNIT. WARNING: SPOKANE COUNTY HAS NO RESPONSIBILITY TO BUILD, IMPROVE, OR MAINTAIN OR OTHERWISE SERVICE THE PRIVATE ROADS, AND ASSOCIAILU DRAINAGE FACIUTIES CONTAINED WITHIN OR PROVIDING SERVICE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS DEVELOPMENT. BY ACCEPTING THIS DEVELOPMENT OF SUBSEQUENTLY BY (� ALLOWING A BUILDING PERMIT TO BE ISSUED FOR PROPERTY ON A PRIVAZR,OAD, SPOKANE COUNTY ASSUMES NO OBUGATION FOR SAID PRIVATE ROAD (( ANT)THE`OWNERS HEREBY < ACKNOWLEDGE NAT THE COUNTY HAS NO OBUGATON OF ANY'KIND OF NATURE WHATSOEVER TO ESTABUSH,- EXAMINE, SURVEY, 'CONSTRUCT, ALTER, REPAIR, IMPROVE, MAINTAIN, PROVIDE DRAINAGE OR SNOW REMOVAL ON A PRIVATE ROAD OR ITS ASSOCIATED DRAINAGE FACIUTIES. v v �. P P_ / \J • r PLAT OF J�? / r c , r i 1 T A 11) II)ITICD 8, T 25 N, R 45 E, W. IV C\ J IN WITNESS WHEREOF, NE AFORESAID OWNERS HAVING HEREUNTO SET THEIR HANDS THIS DAY OF , 1994. STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP BY: HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION ITS GENERAL PARTNER BY ITS BY: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION ITS GENERAL PARTNER BY ITS WELCO CROUP, INCORPORATED, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION BY ITS STATE OF COUNTY OF ON THIS DAY OF , 19_, BEFORE ME PERSONALLY APPEARED KNOWN TO ME, OR ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE, TO BE THE OF HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AND WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT ON BEHALF OF SAID CORPORATION, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCH CORPORATION EXECUTED THE SAME AS THEIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR LAST ABOVE WRII TEN. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF RESIDING IN STATE Cr COUNTY OF ON THIS DAY OF , 19 , BEFORE ME PERSONALLY APPEARED KNOWN TO ME, OR ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE, TO BE THE OF DEAN BUILDING CORPORA110N, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AND WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT ON BEHALF OF SAID CORPORATION, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME NAT SUCH CORPORATION EXECUTED THE SAME AS THEIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS" MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO 'AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR LAST ABOVE WRI I I EN. NOTARY PUBUC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF RESIDING IN STATE OF COUNTY OF ON THIS - - DAY OF 19 BEFORE ME PERSONALLY APPEARED KNOWN TO ME, OR ON NE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE, TO BE THE OF WELCO GROUP, INCORPORATED, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, AND WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT ON BEHALF OF SAID CORPORATION, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCH CORPORATION EXECUTED THE SAME AS THEIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR LAST ABOVE WRITTEN. NOTARY PUBUC I N AND FOR NE STATE OF RESIDING IN SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. DAVID E. SCHUMANN, RLS #22121 DEPUTY SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS _ DAY OF 19 DIRECTOR, SPOKANE COUNTY U11LI11ES SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY PN;�t� DEPARTMENT EXAMINED AND APPROVE "_' TH:S DAY OF 19 . DIRECTOR, SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT acy&E O?UNTY HEA! TH fW ,ENT EXAM1` _D AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF COUNTY - HEALTH OFFICER r4�v ' COUNTY & Z' R EXAIr,:. AND APPRC`.'EU THIS DAY OF` SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR BY DEPUTY SPOKANE COUNTY 0OMMISS7QNER EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS _ ` DAY OF 19 . CHA'RPERSON, SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER BY DEPUTY AUDITOR'S CERIIFlCATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF 19 _, AT M. IN BOOK OF PLAT AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF a • • 9 _ f a e;0 v . 22121 ' .e �.cn • cv • k iL 'I AItU EXPIRES: A 2.Q.KANE COUNTY = TREASURER I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL TAXES WHICH HAVE BEEN LEVIED AND BECOME CHARGEABLE AGAINST THE LAND SHOWN VI1THIN THIS SUBDIVISION HAVE BEEN FULLY PAID THIS DAY OF 19 • Or h daho -I r f II'S1 IVE � r r i... JUN : fl 1995 ,'�'C`zKANE COUNTY ENGINEER- 4-200 West Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 838.4 Phone: (20S) 667 -1171 Fax: (208) 664 -3507 6,2b/41.3'M Srj E T SH EFTA R'C�'coRd O ,1a R 1 . lG� (> fl ( > - T / ; _ A,, , C 4 E F /: f�. CURVE R RADIUS L LENGTH T TANGENT C CHORD BEARING DELTA j C1 2 20.00' 7 7.14' 3 3.61' 7 j C2 7 758.00' 1 109.27' 5 54.73' 1 109.17' N85•15'19'E 08 C3 2 20.00' 3 31.43' 2 20.02' 2 28.30' N45'O1'36'E 90'03'08' C4 2 20,00' 3 31.40' 1 19.98' 2 28,27' S44'58'24•E 89'56'52' 1 C5 2 20.00' 3 31.43' 2 20,02' 2 28.30' S45'01'35' %../ '\ - '- 0 j C6 6 600.00' 4 40.16' 2 20.09' 4 40.15' S38•58'29'E . C8 2 20.00' 1 14.45' 7 7.56' ' .3•50•06' C9 7 725.00' 1 18.67' 9 9.34' 1 18.6714.14 S C10 6 625.00' 2 267.95' 1 136.06' 2 265.90' S28•36'37•E 24•33 9 ' C11 7 725.00' 1 154.32' 7 77.45' 1 154.03' N ?• 2. •54'06'V 12'11'44' C12 2 2129.86' 4 487.58' 2 244.86' : :56.51' N69'25'32'E 13'06'59' C13 4 410.02' 8 81.92' 4 41.10' 8 81. 78' N05'43'24 '✓ 11'26.2' C14 4 410.00' 1 132 6 66.96' 1 132.18' N20'43'24' 8' C15 7 715.00' 1 132.7 2' 6 66.55' 1 132.53' 1 C16 . 715.00'' 2 233.97' 1 118.04' 2 222.93' N80'00'37'C 18•44'.`"7' C17 7 685,00' 8 82.82' 4 41.46 8 82,76' N85' '1 • . +" 55 _ C18 3 385.00' 4 49.71' 2 24.89' 4 _7 • C19 3 385.00' 1 102.16' 5 51.38' 1 101,86' N15'00'00'W 15'12'14' C20 3 385.00' 4 49.71' 2 24,89' 4 49,67' N26'18'03'W 07'23'52' C21 7 758.00' 1 121.18' 6 60.72' 1 121,06' N76'32`44'E 09109'36' C22 2 20,00' 3 31,40' 1 19.98' 2 28,27'. S44•58'25'E 8956'52' C23 2 20.00' 3 31.40' 1 19.98' - 2 28,27' 'S44 89'56'52' C24 20.00' 3 31.43' 2 20A2 2 28.30' S45'O1'35'W 9O�`03'O8° C25 4 435.00' . 1 16.19' 8 8.10' 1 16.19'_ N28'56'00'v 32'07'58' C26 4 435.00' 7 79,23' 3 39,73' 7 79.12' N22'38'56' ,./ 10'26'09' C27 2 20.00' 3 30.65' 1 19.25' 2 27.74' S61 87'48'41' C28 4 435.00' 4 46,00' 2 23.02' 4 45.98' ;NO3'01'45' ' C6•03'33' C29 2 20.00' 2 C30 2 20.00' 2 24.02' 1 13.70' 2 22.60' S32 21 .' : • 68'48'34' C31 2 20.00' 9 9.68' 4 4.93' 9 9.58' - S16 27'43'03' C32 2 20,00' 2 24.02' 1 13,70' 2 22.60' N72'13'13'v 68'48'34' C33 2 20.00' 2 2.73' 1 1.37' 2 2.73' N33'54'27'v 07•.48 I. C34 7 758.00' 6 6.96' 3 3.48' 6 6.96' N60•15'4 8'E - 00'31'33' C35 7 745.00' 8 84.87' 4 42.48' 8 84.82' N63'15'50'r 06'31'37' C36 7 745.00' 2 208.17' 1 104,77' 2 207.49' N81 8'E 16•00'35' , C37 2 20.00' 2 24.26' 1 13.88' 2 22.80' S54'37'43"✓ 69'30'46' C38 2 20.00' 2 24.26' = = 13.88' 2 22.80' S25•14'39'.' 69'30'46' C39 2 20.00' 7 7.15' 3 3.61' 7 7,11' , S19'45'21'E 2_0'29'14' C40 2 20.00' 7 7.15' 3 3,61' 7 7.U' N40•14•36'v 2_O'29'14' C41 2 20.00' 2 2426' 1 13.88' 2 22,80' N85•14'36'v 69'30'46' C42 7 700.00' 7 7.79' 3 3.90' 7 7.79' N29•4 0'51'v 00'38'15' C43 7 750.00' 5 5.79' 2 2.89' 5 5.79' N29'46'42'V 00'26'32' C44 6 600.00' 2 21.88' 1 10.94' 2 21.88' S17'22'24'£ 02'05'24' SEE DETAIL 'A' BALDWIN AUGUSTA ' : 1. I j_ 30.00 , W 01 oo D c an in (Y) (Y) o oh 00 7 8 CO) n CO J L19 18A17 co N s N oo A CZ W • 1r: L1 (R) -- 60.00' - - 30,00' 30' S89'23'06'W IMO OM ON. -FD, RE -STEEL PIN AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #4337 FOR .W 1/4 CORNER, RP'S PER COUNTY RECORD. #8109180257 (NOT A PART) FD. 1/2 INCH REBAR W /SURCAP MARKED 'WELBORN PLS 15043' N89'23'06'E 370.00' <R2) S89'23'06'1./ 369,88' (M) 322.29' 291.47' 226.50' 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT - FOUND 1/2' REBAR W/ PLASTIC CAP RLS #22121 UNPLATTED NOT /NW • • A PART FD. 1/2' REBAR V/ SURCAP MARKED 'WELBORN PLS '15043' 1 s FD. SPOKANE COUNTY BRASS CAP AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #2455 RP'S PER COUNTY RECORD. #8109180257 NUT f, PART) L14 TRHC:T 'F' N.LL L.) ZrJI r 226.45' " /Fs C17 T.145316sF _ 6 C3� 6027 SF c\ 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASE #.ENT (TYP) 25' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIE4 TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL 'B' N89•56'S0'V 552.80' J N89'56'50'W 627,6EE:' cu TRACT 'H' TRACT 'I' 1' WIDE STRIP UNPLATTED NOT A PART C5 32 T SF 9.7 u+\' .J s 02 6. 9 3 ' .vim 2 . , c ?,532 SF c '19- ;14. •.: • • 3 7,887 SF ., 2 S89'54'16'4 6 d R31f1 V ' 100.4 4 2' • • ,� 7,983 , o . v 8 SFr' : 668 cc��,, ' .a r, - •S89•59'58'E �w N8954'16'V ' • 0 nt 10 .00' 1u • yr 103.63' a � W 0 � � 6,756 SF . � Z vD co $89•54'16'E N -J 100.00' ✓ • ..103.63 ! CU 1:.. o : 6 - w ZZ 6, 521 SF " o 6,736 SF (U 100.00, ` co SB9'54'16'E 1 o N89 103.63' o� o �' o o In :6,736 SF N89 .63' o b i n 6,7 103 SFr tri S89 103.63' 2 9 • 6 ,736 SF • i o c 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT NO DIRECT ACCESS TO LOTS WITHIN RIVERWALK TO THE WASHINGTON STATE CENTENNIAL TRAIL IS PERMITTED PER SPOKANE COUNTY REQUIREMENTS, c.5 C30 •54' -tZ d:\ , R3' . 303.63' • 10 6,736 SF . 103.63' • S89'54i16'E` 0 `D ¢,736 SF - 03.63' •� 389'54' 6'Q, •D :6,736 SF - '.1`.° 103.63' 0 Lt ) •- CU 25' MISSION AVENUE /MP A PORTION EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL 'D' L23 i!) cu (U J ' TRACT 9,713,S 9 c' 7,257 SFo SC Cr 1 ■ . s 9 �bo S\ r , gg `to a- 7,2b0 SF ,,P ' 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE 4- 0 00° ° ' o v • AND UTILITY EASEMENT 5 :n '1`) � ✓� 3 „ TRACT ' Br 3 3:1 1 ` :: ° � N 7 i \ ✓1 Y � D r tnN ' 9,335 S 5 '2a 1O• r? i s ° N tN , n' -� o s; _ 5 1-1 o o 8,039 SF '' 6,431 SF cu • •-20'.-4.S4-•"°--°,=, :ii CU � 0 = 7 - 3 1 . u°-) 2 as 0 ;6,741 SF Z �189'S9'S8'W yr 70.00' P F o 25' o? v1 1 (U t� o � . V , .6,737 SF J 20 .p. S89'54'16'E ) 13 0. :9,391 SF_ 25' B.S.__ L = zl 9010' e2''ro .. v W 4 c • t o 7,409 S >_ 6;7,739 SF ,2A ' F '2 0\'� � v L7 L8 6,521 SF N89'59'S8'V 0 0 tr) W CU 0 z S 89'56'44' E 2615,78' (RL1) N 89'56'50' W 2615.78' (M) I Al WALK FBRST AJ)DIJ! 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT OF THE S 1/2 CF TH SPE <ANE o 1 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE :AND - UTILITY "'EASEMEENT (TYP) TRACT 'A' 62,032 SF 1.42 AC S89'56'Sl'E 215.00' _ L2 N o AUGUSTA LANE 988.16' P U t1\ 13.00 (c)■),,- tip. S 8, .J►t�9 • 1 9,097 SF _ 0 \s-C S 2 o ✓ S „ w 9,100 SF , s us; \� l ° o oZ .J r X o_ 5 6° ,� 3 ,' 9.888 9,888 SF S s TEMPORARY T L'RNAkOUND AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT 1 F �11'S )RRL t'. 1's C t<� r' 91:(1rol(? ✓ � 1 r� 'Ike �4', .c N1G� " \r� T-N G av e v ,• \ s9 (A RG A`.3 & : c "., .j9ct rr A. 1 A JU LF' /i L_ C c r SURVEYOR'S NOTE S 1 R(\ i Cr i E ti /11 �/it R '� �' S U N ES S R AZ'C) `>c. 11� 0 is � G l ivfi L eiA �e.mC r rC d� [ r e CORD INFORMATION ON THIS MAP WAS TAKEN \�^ T r r' aa T RE - TRACT 'J''r v11vc 1,‘) c \7.(}' °v /`A ;( 1 �.ttc;rU FROM SPOKANE COUNTY RECORDS AS FOLLOWS! 1' WID � STRIP toutul K.y Uc;t',: J L C 1 1' 1 ' RECORD LABEL BOOKS :�\!owr�c i'�K - �.,c> O 11' 5 \ 01 P` U NPLATTE � OF SURVEYS! r � �1(�t'�A i � CRL1> BOOK 27, PAGE 42 tea 1300' ,) cc M?f� \ -5 CRL2) BOCK 25, PAGE 83 r .0O NOT A PART <RL3) BOOK 9, PAGE 79 ,, eo °�5o CRL4) BOOK 50, PAGE 27 11 N � tt 1 . r O ▪ � \ ' 8.071F 7.0 112.` 2 �' 7,925 SF •N - c-•Q'1 .p cP • C• . „ ' D 10,463 SF 5A A2 2'34 y 1 S3� • \ 'a8,60 15 g. 126� �th `' ` 1 » 8,151 Sf s h - N .9- AND ° 0_ .9_ 13' DRAINAGE,SLOPE AND SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORDS: UTILITY EASEMENT #433 #245 #245 4 UNPLATTED NOT A PART 0 ro 16' `SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) 9,067 SF `'� FINAL PLAT LF E SW 1/4, SECTIEN 8, T 25 N R 45 COUNTY, WAS -INCT N 4/ 5 9,781 SF rn ND :1 50 ��Lv cR� FD. 'SPOKANE C IUNTY BRASS CA? WITH X ON CENTS `IN=_' OF MISSION AVENUE AS INDICATED N SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #2454 FOR 5 ?./11 CORNER RP'S PER COUNTY RECORD, - EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL 'C' 7 ` 5 � l..U� RIV t ERWALK FIRST, ADDITION CONTAINS 3.26 ✓ACRES GROSS. TRACT 'Y' CONSISTS OF THE PRIVATE ROADS McMILLAN LANE, BALDWIN LANE, HARMONY LANE, AND AUGUSTA LANE, AND CONTAINS 2.42 ACRES. 100 50 GRAPHIC 100 1, 200 ( LNF�.��T) 1 inch -= 100 ft. SCALE BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS MAP IS THE WEST LINE OF THE SW ./4 OF SECTION 8 TAKEN AS 5 00 °35'03' E, TAKEN FROM RAILS, FILED AT BOOK 27, PAGE 42, OF SURVEYS, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, ACCURACY STATEMENT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED USING A PENTAX P X10D 10 SECOND THEODOLITE WITH EN BOARD ELECTRONIC DISTANCE METER, FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS WERE USED ;i;` ACCORDANCE WITH WAC 332 - 130 -90 SECTION 'C'. RADIAL LINE TABLE LINE ) D Rl N14'00 IRECTION 'S9 "✓ R2 N15'14'32' ' 1 R3 N 15'05'502.' ' R4 N23'0 ,' u R5 N25'4-. O. G' 1---- R6 ;,26'C3 ' R7 N7 R9 s''.i ;'t.' , 810 560 W Rli 539 2 7'W R12 5 9'59'58'E: - 8131 '29'o'E S 180 ,• -------RR-11-f6' 811' 820 ''' N16 S5 2 ' ll 37 3o u , R23 N87•43'04•E k24 125 4 N07'32 31'G` R26 N08'52'28'W R27 __N40.47'40'E R S70'07'40'E 829 S62'07'59'V v; R30 ^67'23'53V R31 _ S82'36'07' l W R32 N17 31 43'W 833 N00'03'10'EH r ,'TR34 - S00'03'09'W 835 N09'54'03'W SET 1/2 INCH REBAR W/ RED CAP RLS #22121, OR ' AS NOTED OR n Phone: B.S. CR), R44 (M) CRL #) Nor AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF , 19 AT M. N r - •--- -) 1 BUUK OF PLAT AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF DEPUTY LEGEND FD. MONUMENT AS ;DESCRIBED LINE TABLE P LINE I DIRECTION 1 DISTANCE-1 L1 S89'24'57' ' 15_00' --L2 S89'56'Sl'E 125,00' L3 SOO 00'04'W 10.00' N89 83.61 1 S 16 , '� NCO 02'29'E 56 7 S 56 51 "E 50.02' N89 •56 s 1'v n.. r , -- N2.;:-.,°4'17'w 9 53.1-27-7 21, No9'23' ^6'E ?_27'7 V.1.2 SOO 35'03'E 8498' . „ ,05-u 1' �'\t 23'06'E 2591 ;_ 1' y", 00'02'W _i5' L 1; 5 00 06 02"./ 1 168 5'24' lj 1 1 _8 N-29 ;59'5.8'W 15.61' r L1`.) sr Cps -1 SO0'34'05'E 1� S00'34'05'E 16.81' r ' N00'00'02'E 9s 00' F89'56'5i'E --, 45 00'_ FD. CONTROLLING SECTION CORNER OR 1/4 CORNER AS DESCRIBED CALCULATED POINT NOTHING SET BUILDING SETBACK SET 2 INCH IRON PIPE W/ BRASS CAP MARKED RLS #22121 IN MONUMENT CASE RADIAL 'BEARING FIELD MEASUREMENT 1 RECORD LABEL 10 BLOCK NUMBER JUN 3n1995 8~PO A4E tit \'TY ENGINEER Idaho ng neer n 4200 West Seltzce Way Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 1E 1 (208) 667 -1171 Fax: (208) 664 -3507 6 /78,<15,XXy S EST CURVE TABLE TRACT "G" 1' WIDE STRIP TRACT I(' 1' WIDE STRIP L19 25.00' FD. 1/2 INCH REBAR W /SURCAP MARKED 'WELBORN PLS 15043' 5' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT L11 S8 • • 3'06'W 322.29' 226.45' 2 5' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE, OPE AND UTILITY EASEME 1T S89'23'06'4/ 291.47' t ~ INDIANA AVENUE i • 226.50' o x - • 13' DRANAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT t N89•23'06'E 245.23` ' s 2.5' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP)! 16' SIDEWALK, SLOE, AND UTILITY EASEMEN: GYP) A = 02'48'59' R 700.00' T = 17.21' L = 34.41' • 1 •\,1(R' 5 —16' SIDEWALK SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) UNPLATTED NOT A PART N89 °56'S0'W 10' RIGHT -OF -WAY DEDICATION PORTION EF THE SW 1/4, N 8, T 25 NI, SPE<ANE CDUNT'y) WASH- -INGTZ N ".C,' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND .TIL`TY EASEMENT (TYP) 25' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE: AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANCLe —� h- I S 00'00'04" 1.29' T _ I S 83'45' 00" W -- 102:81' 83.61' EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE 7 S'6 0 S 89'56'50" E 173.60' c,:_ _ 90.00' C4 MISSION AVENUE S 89 E 2615.78' (RL1) N 89 W 2615,78' (M) 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 4-4.95' L A , = 40'29 00" R= 20.00' T = 7.38' L = 14.13' UNPLATTED NOT A PART EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE 1988.16' 13' DRAINAGE, "SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT DEPUTY Fax: (208) 664 - 3507 FILED FOR RECORD THIS _ DAY OF 19 AT M. ; IN BOOK OF PLAT AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF SHE H EE'1._S CURVE 1 RADIUS 1 LENGTH 1 TANGENT 1 CHORD 1 BEARING 1 DELTA C1 20.00' 714' 3.61' 7.10' S09'38'39'W 20'27'23' C2 758.00' 109.27' 54.73' 109.17' N85'15'19'E 08'15'34' C3 . 20.00' 31.43' 20,02' 28.30' N45'01'36 90'03'08' C4 20.00' 31.40' 19.98' 28.27' 244'58'24'E 89'56'52' C5 20.00' 31.43' 20.02' 28.30' 245'01'35'W 90'03'08' C6 600.00' 40.16' 20,09' 40.15' 238'58'29'E 03'50'06' C8 20.00' 14.45' 7.56' 14.14' 269'54'37'E 41'24'35' C9 725.00' 18.67' 9.34' 18,67' N17'03'58'W 01'28'32' C10 625.00' 267.95' 136.06' 265,90' 228'36'37 24'33'49' C11 725.00' 154.32' 77.45' 154.03' N23'54'06'W 12'11'44' C12 2129.86' 487.58' 244.86' 48651' N69'25'32'E 13 °06'59' C13 410.00' 81,92' 41,10' 81.78' N05'43'24'W 11252' C14 410.00' 132.76' 66.96' 132.18' N20'43'24'W 18 C15 715.00' 132.72' 66.55' 132.53' N6519'05'E 10'3£ 'r C16 715.00' 233.97' 118.04' 232.93' N80'00'37'E 18'44'57' C17 685.00' 82,82' 41.46' 82.76' N85'55'17'E 06 C18 385.00' 49.71' 24,89' 49,68' NO3'41'56'W 07'23'54' C19 385.00' 102.16' 51.38' 101.86' N15'00'00'W 15'12'14' C20 385.00' 49.71' 24.89' 49.67' N2618'03'W 07'23'52' C21 758.00' 121.18' 60.72' 121.06' N76'32'44 09'09'36' C22 20.00' 31.40' 19.98' 28.27' S44'58' 25'E 89'56'52' C23 20.00' 31.40' 19.98' 28,27' 244'58'25 89'56'52' C24 20.00' 31.43' 20.02' 28.30' 245'01'35'W 90'03'08'. C25 435.00' 16.19' 8.10' 16.19' N28'56'00'W 02'07'58' C26 435.00' 79.23' 39.73' 79.12' N22'38'56'W 10'26'09' C27 20.00' 30.65' 19.25' 27.74' S61'2012'E 87'48'41' C28 435.00' 46.00' 23.02' 45.98' NO3'01'45'W 06'03'33:" C29 20.00' 28.26' 17.07' 25.97' S34'2519'W 80'57'41' C30 20.00' 24.02' 13.70' 22.60' 232'07'21'W 68'48'34' C31 20.00' 9.68' 4.93' 9.58' 216'08'27'E 27'43'03' C32 20.00' 24.02' 13.70' 22.60' N72'13'13'W 68'48'34' C33 20.00' 2,73' 1.37' 2.73' N33'54'27'W 07'48'57' C34 758.00' 6.96' 3.48' 6.96' N60'15'48'E 00131'33' C35 745.00' 84.87' 42.48' 84.82' N631.5'50'E 06'31'37' C36 745.00' 208.17' 104.77' 207.49' N81'22'48'E 16'00'35' C37 20.00' 2426' 13.88' 22.80' 254'37'43'W 69'30'46' C38 20.00' 24.26' 13.88' 22.80' S25'14'39'W 69'30'46' C39 20.00' 7,15' 3.61' 7.11' 219'45'21'E 20'29'14' C40 20.00' 7.15' 3.61' 7.11' N4014'36'W 20 °29'14' C41 20.00' 24.26' 13.88' 22.80' N8514'36'W 69'30'46' C42 700.00' 7.79' 3.90' 7.79' N29'40'51'W 00'38'15' C43 750.00' 5.79' 2.89' 5.79' N29'46'42'W 00'26'32' C44 600.00' 21.88' 10.94' 21.88' 217'22'24'E 02'05'24' C45 750.00' 43.12' 21.57' 43.12' N17'58'32'W 03'17'40' C46 20.00' 29.67' 18.32' 27.02' N21'27'08 84.59'16' C47 20,00' 33.66' 22.38' 29.82' N67'3119'W 96 °25'23' C48 745.00' 89.04' 4457' 88.99' N69'57'04 06'50'52' C51 685.00' 242.43' 122.49' 241.16' 270'08'21'W 2016'39' C56 672.00' 235.73' 119.09' 23452' N70'02'59'E 20'05'55' LINE 1 DIRECTION 1 DISTANCE Ll 289'24'57'W 15.00' L2 S89'56'51'E 125.00' L3 S00'00'04'W 10.00' L4 N89'56'50'W 83,61' L5 S00'03'10'W 10.00' L6 200'02'29'E 50.00' L7 S89'56'51'E 50.02' L8 N89•56'51'W 30,00' L9 N30'00'02'E 25,00' L10 N26'49'17'W 53.52' L11 N89'23'06'E 21.79' L12 S00'35'03'E 84.98' L13 N00'34'05'W 3.63' L14 N89'23'06'E 25.81' L15 S00'00'02'W 1.35' N08 S00'00'02'W 15,43' L17 N68'45'24'E 21.18' L18 N29'59'58'W 15.61' L19 S89'24'57'W 30,00' L20 S00'34'05'E 13.17' L21 S00'34'05'E 16.81' L22 N00'00'02'E 95.00' L23 S89'56'51'E 45.00' LINE 1 DIRECTION R1 N14'00'59'W R2 N1514'32'W R3 N15'05'S0'W R4 N23'07'32'W R5 N25'44'01'W R6 N26'03'14'4/ R7 N72'11'46'E R8 S65'24'36'W R9 S60'26'34'W R10 S60'38'17'W R11 S39'30'47'W R12 S29'59'58'E R13 N80'29'16'E R14 S29'59'58'E R15 N29'28'25'W R16 N23'28'22'W R18 N19'21'52'W R20 252'11'04'W R21 N16'37'30'W R23 N87•43'04'E R24 N09'43'20'W R25 N07'32'31'W R26 N08 R27 N40'47'40'E R28 S70'07'40'E R29 262'07'59'W R30 S67'23'53'W R31 282'36'07'W R32 N17'31'43'W R33 N00'03'10'E R34 S00'03'09'W R35 N09'54'03'\ SEE DETAIL 'A' r.. 1. .•. B.S. •aa • 9,726 SF ' c o r • °-. co • •\,l sue o° .Lo sa =° \ ;63 \ � 6 = 2 1 - 3\ c-1 . 7,532 SF p2 rc9_ d, ")n•C O° t3k O 2 \• 9382 1 \��) •\,I \� 6$ • 4'Z 24,820 SF Ls , 0,57 AC p,• ..p_ S6a a5 2 ` s c 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE ‘- AND UTILITY EASEMENT TRACT 'B' 331 c` • • • • CU a. ' L19 226.45' -1 T s C17 3 A S S89'23'06'W 291.47' C36 226.50' - - '- 6 027 SF #8109180257 (NOT A PART) FD. 1/2' REBAR � o W cu / SURCAP MARKED C 'WELBORN PLS 15043' C51 TRACT 'F' L14 N.T.S. C5 32 c5 ti C30 R3 100.42' tr 6,68 SFr- sr) N89'S4'16'W • Co 3 0 \ C '•7,8 SF '.E\ 289'54'16' R31 11 X 7, 3 9 SF PN 'e-s: rs o \ ,41 1 X 1 2 • w s91Ai.' 2 q' ' B S ' SF 7,9 � 'S89'59'58'E N89'59'58'W 1 0 6,431 SF • o o 4 >_ Cn 7,409 SF in ° N p�0 sF C) 50.00' 1 • A f 8,03 SF C41 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) TRACT 'A' 62,032 SF S89'56'51'E • 1.42 AC 55.00' - ✓ 200'00'02'W 33.00' /�� � 9,0 SF r i .• 56 2 ° . r9 \ r'' t 3\ s \ $) 9,100 SF r 7,257 SF , J o \� ° ° -�\ r 7,260 n\ %$ • \A 2 0 60 039p� 'J'\ v\ s r \ „d 9 6 N ' 30' .-- 7 ✓ N 9,335 SF\ c, ( 7 83 SF � P R1 -)e co ' _.(2:- � a ... ° 8,077 SF, F . 60 3� 6 ; tom\ 6:-‘ ( 7,925 SF ,.;o: ` " ''\ 9\ C Z( �� 3 � � \$ . � <R 37 ( \\ _' 3 01, . 8,191 SF .F(SO 9 5° 4 . � \2 7 9 4 9,067 co 4 ' r 10,463 SF 9.,781 SF W q1q \ �. (9) s11 6 3 8.690 SF ,0 ts■ e s65 7 8,815 S532A\,1(9) > \ moo S��O 8,699 SF \c' e r � . W btc 30 30.00' BALDWIN AUGUSTA U) CT c') co 18 ►17 8 0' 1 (R) 60.00' 30.00' m FD. RE -STEEL PIN AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #4337 FOR W 1/4 CORNER. RP'S PER COUNTY RECORD. #8109180257 (NOT A PART) FD. 1/2 INCH REBAR W /SURCAP MARKED 'WELBORN PLS 15043' N89'23'06'E 370.00' (R2) S89'23'06'W 369.88' (M) 322.29' 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT FOUND 1/2' REBAR W/ PLASTIC CAP RLS *22121 UNPLATTED NOT A PART N89'56'50'W N89 °56'50'W RIVER WAT iK FIRS '1" AD D riviE0 N (A PLANNIH: 11 ) UNIT 11)EVI A PORTION OF THE S 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4, SECTION 8, T 25 N, R 45 E, W.M., SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON C2 25' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL 'B' FD, SPOKANE COUNTY BRASS CAP AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #2455 RP'S PER COUNTY RECORD, 552.80' _ .1 627.62' 0 TRACT 'H' TRACT 'I' 1' WIDE STRIP UNPLATTED NOT A PART 10' FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA N X56 o 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) �i 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE UTILITY EASEMENT AND UTILITY EASEMENT 103.63' C oa. o ,. ur � c? 6,76SF Zo co S89'54'16'E cU 103.63' i 1) NO DIRECT ACCESS TO LOTS WITHIN RIVERWALK TO THE WASHINGTON STATE CENTENNIAL TRAIL IS PERMITTED PER SPOKANE COUNTY REQUIREMENTS, 10 W 6,736 SF 103.63' T 289'54'16'E EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL 'D' 25' W z Q J I z 0 11 °I 6,736 SF -� 103,63' 289'54'16'£ .1_ 12 1. 6,736 SF ", ` 103.63' 289'54'16'E 1 13 c 9,391 SF J N. 25' B.S. , >!r 390 1 1* MISSION AVENUE TRACT 'H' 9,713 SF 100.00' 6,521 SF • 100.00' ca 6 o w 6,736 SF No • 389'54'16'E --• `° o Q 103.63' : o Z 0 7 0 1• ° z • 12 6,736 Sr:: c • N89'54'16'WI e 103.63' L 2 8 c 6,736 SFr' 289'54'16'E 1 o • ti 103.63' • W .J cD i.„, o w • CL 9 pc 2 r cp o N 6,736 SFJ ' 1 uj o :6,741 SF • N8 9'54'16'W a', ; oo �J89'59'58'Wl 103.63' Z I v 70.00' 4•,9 0 B. 25' cv ,� `�D 1 6 7; 4: 37 SF B, c? L231 J L7 in cu In w CU 0 S 89 °56'44' E 2615,78' (RLI) N 89 °56'50' W 2615.78' (M) S89•56'51'E s 215.00' �' 9 DRAINAGE EASEMENT 99 9 V.r • 13.00' O IA \" TRACT 'J' 1' ' /ID STRIP z po o2i CJ ° o •-p- 13' DRAINAGE,SLOPE i-5cf) UTILITY EASEMENT (5- , ) 5 .9 - 6 5 8, • N o mo o ° AUGUSTA LANE L8 0 t) Q4 W CU 0 Z 1988.16' UNPLATTED NOT A PART FINAL PLAT DF TEMPORARY TURNAROUND AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT c AND UNPLATTED NOT A PART 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) SEE SHEET 4 FOR DRAINAGE EASEMENT DETAILS E THROUGH P. EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL 'C' FD. SPOKANE COUNTY BRASS CAP WITH X ON CENTERLINE OF MISSION AVENUE AS INDICATED ON SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #2454 FOR S 1/4 CORNER RP'S PER COUNTY RECORD, SURVEYOR'S NOTES THE RECORD INFORMATION ON THIS MAP WAS TAKEN FROM SPOKANE COUNTY RECORDS AS FOLLOWS: RECORD LABEL (RL1) (RL2) (RL3) (RL4) RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION CONTAINS 13.80 ACRES GROSS, BOOKS OF SURVEYS: BOOK 27, PAGE 42 BOOK 25, PAGE 83 BOOK 9, PAGE 79 BOOK 50, PAGE 27 AND SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORDS: #4337 #2455 #2454 TRACT 'Y' CONSISTS OF THE PRIVATE ROADS McMILLAN LANE, BALDWIN LANE, HARMONY LANE, AND AUGUSTA LANE, AND CONTAINS 2.42 ACRES. CURVE TABLE GRAPHIC SCALE (INS) 1 inch = 100 ft. BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS MAP IS THE WEST LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 8 TAKEN AS S 00 °35'03' E, TAKEN FROM R.O.S. FILED AT BOOK 27, PAGE 42, OF SURVEYS, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED USING A PENTAX PX1OD 10 SECOND THEODOLITE WITH ON BOARD ELECTRONIC DISTANCE METER, FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS WERE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WAC 332- 130 -90 SECTION '0 ". ACCURACY STATEMENT RADIAL LINE TABLE 0 • SET 1/2 INCH REBAR W/ RED CAP RLS #22121, OR AS NOTED OR '' FD. CONTROLLING SECTION CORNER OR 1/4 CORNER AS DESCRIBED CALCULATED POINT - NOTHING SET B.S. BUILDING SETBACK , SET 2 INCH IRON PIPE W/ BRASS CAP MARKED RLS #22121 IN MONUMENT CASE (R), R# RADIAL BEARING (M) AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS _ DAY OF AT M. IN BOOK OF PLAT AT PAGE THE REQUEST OF DEPUTY LEGEND FD, MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED FIELD MEASUREMENT (RL #) RECORD LABEL North Idaho Engineering 4200 West Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 Phone: (208) 887-1171 Fax: (208) 684 -3507 SHEET 2 4 H EETS ® BLOCK NUMBER LINE TABLE - 1/18/45 tor+ \se tnaPawa DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, TIMBERLAND SAVINGS BANK, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION. AND MORVEST CAPITAL CORPORATION, A BRITISH COLUMBIA CORPORATION HAS CAUSED TO BE PLATTED INTO LOTS. TRACTS AND STREETS. THE LAND SHOWN HEREON. TO BE KNOWN HENCEFORTH AS THE RIVERWALX FIRST ADDITION WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; A PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 45 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. COUNTY OF SPOKANE. STATE OF WASHINGTON. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE NORTH 00'35'03 WEST 873.95 FEET ALONG THE WEST UNE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH 8924'57' EAST 30.00 Fttt TO THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY UNE OF BARKER ROAD, MARKED BY A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP, THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 8924'57" EAST 15.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS, NON - TANGENT CURVE WHICH IS CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 7.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 202723° AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 09'38'39 EAST 7.10 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE DEPARTING THE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED CURVE ALONG A NON- TANGENT UNE NORTH 8923'06' EAST 245.23 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 758.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE WHICH IS CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 109.27 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0815'34" TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE DEPARTING THE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED CURVE ALONG A NON- TANGENT UNE SOUTH 29'56'26" EAST 215.80 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 00'00'04' WEST 686.49 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY UNE OF MISSION AVENUE WHICH IS MARKED BY A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY SOUTH 89'56'50' EAST 173.60 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE DEPARTING SAID RIGHT OF WAY NORTH 00'03'10" EAST 10.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS, NON - TANGENT CURVE WHICH IS CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.40 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89'56'52 AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 44'58'24" WEST 28.27 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 00'00'02" EAST 95.00 Ftn TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE WHICH IS CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.43 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°03'08 TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE DEPARTING THE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED CURVE ALONG A NON- TANGENT UNE NORTH 00'02'29" WEST 50.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 89'56'51' EAST 50.02 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 00'00 EAST 195.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 8956'51" EAST 30.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 00'00'02" EAST 180.42 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 89 EAST 215.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 4229'21" EAST 89.99 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 5959'58' EAST 182.52 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 30'00'02' EAST 25.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 59'59'58" WEST 102.02 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 26'49'17" WEST 53.52 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 49'06 EAST 185.43 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 600.00 FOOT RADIUS, NON - TANGENT CURVE WHICH IS CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 40.16 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03'50'06' AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 3858'29" WEST 40.15 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE DEPARTING THE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED CURVE ALONG A NON- TANGENT UNE NORTH 52'56 EAST 150.00 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 27'41 WEST 145.73 Ftt I TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 22'41'20' WEST 149.19 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE NORTH 2959'58" WEST 290.98 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 60 WEST 508.04 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 672.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE WHICH IS CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.73 THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20'05'55" AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS SOUTH 70'02'59' WEST TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE DEPARTING THE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED CURVE ALONG A NON- TANGENT UNE SOUTH 00'34'05 EAST 16.81 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH REBAR MTh PLASTIC CAP; THENCE SOUTH 8923'06 WEST 369.88 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BARKER ROAD WHICH IS MARKED BY A 1/2 INCH REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 0035'03" EAST 84.98 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 13.80 ACRES MORE OR LESS. FINAL I V/HJiWAT1K FIJRST ADDITION ( A P T ,ANNED UNIT DE VELO PMENT) A PORTION OF THE S 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4, SECTION 8, T 25 N, R 45 E, W.M., SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON BE IT FURTHER KNOWN THAT THE OWNERS AS SHOWN HEREON DO HEREBY DEDICATE TO PUBUC USE FOREVER THE STREETS AND ROADS SHOWN WITHIN THIS PLAT. TRACT "Y BEING PRIVATE ROADS ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO NE RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION CREATED BY OCUMENT RECORDED 111/-11 251 1495 UNDER STATE UBI NUMBER (p0 I (D f 5 -99 TRACTS ° G ", T, "J AND 'K BEING ONE -FOOT (1') WIDE STRIPS AS SHOWN HEREON, ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO SPOKANE COUNTY AS GENERAL COUNTY PROPERTY, TO BE DEDICATED FOR ROAD PURPOSES AT SUCH TIME AS THE ROAD IS CONTINUED AS FULL WIDTH RIGHT OF WAY, OR UNTIL ADJACENT LANDS ARE PLATTED. THE PRIVATE ROADS, AS SHOWN HEREON ARE EASEMENTS WHICH PROVIDE A MEANS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR THOSE LOTS WITHIN THE PLAT HAVING FRONTAGE THEREON. LOTS 2, 3, AND 4, BLOCK 5 AND LOTS 6, 7, AND 8, BLOCK 6 ARE LOCATED ON A TEMPORARY STUB ROAD. THIS TEMPORARY STUB ROAD MAY BE EXTENDED TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTY AND /OR CONNECT TO EXISTING ROADS OR NEW ROADS AS DEVELOPMENT AND /OR CIRCULATION NEEDS DICTATE EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE FOR DRAINAGE. UTIUTIES, SIDEWALKS, AND SLOPE EASEMENTS AS SPECIFIED. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. AS PLAIILO AND SHOWN HEREON, WHICH ARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING, OPERATION, AND MAINTAINING DRAINAGE SWALES AND DRAINAGE FACIUTIES TO DISPOSE OF RUNOFF, ARE HEREBY GRANTED TO THE RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION OR ITS SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. EASEMENTS FOR SIDEWALKS AND SLOPE ARE HEREBY GRANTED TO THE RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION. UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PLAT ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE SERVING UTILITY COMPANIES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, RECONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF UTIUTIES. TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO INSPECT SAID UTILITIES AND TO TRIM AND /OR REMOVE BRUSH AND TREES THAT MAY INTERFERE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE SAME. SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENTS IN LOT 13, BLOCK 1. LOTS 7, AND 9, BLOCK 4, AND LOT 1, BLOCK 6, AS PLATTED AND SHOWN HEREON, ARE HEREBY GRANTED TO SPOKANE COUNTY AND ITS AUTHORIZED AGENTS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF ALLOWING A CLEAR VIEW SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE OVER AND ACROSS THE EASEMENTS. THE OWNERS OF SAID LOTS AGREE NOT TO OBSTRUCT OR IN ANY MANNER ALLOW ANY OBSTACLE TO BLOCK THIS CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE BETWEEN A HEIGHT OF THREE )3) FEET AND A HEIGHT OF SEVEN (7) Ftt I ABOVE THE ROAD PAVEMENT ELEVATION ADJACENT TO SAID LOTS. SPOKANE COUNTY AND ITS AUTHORIZED AGENTS ARE HEREBY GRANTED THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS TO, OVER AND FROM SAID EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSPECTION AND EMERGENCY MAINTENANCE OF THE SIGHT DISTANCE AREA. IF THE PROPERTY OWNER FAILS TO MAINTAIN THE SIGHT DISTANCE AREA IN REASONABLE • CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER, A NOTICE OF SUCH FAILURE MAY BE GIVEN TO THE PROPERTY OWNER. IF NOT CORRECTED AFTER TEN (10) DAYS. SPOKANE COUNTY HAS THE RIGHT TO CORRECT THE MAINTENANCE FAILURE OR HAVE IT CORRECTED AT THE SOLE EXPENSE OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO THE SEPARATE DECLARATION OF COVENANT AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S DOCUMENT NO. WHICH BY REFERENCE IS MADE A PART HEREOF. THE EASEMENT AS PIA! ItD AND SHOWN HEREON ON LOT 8, BLOCK 6 IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTAWNG, USE AND MAINTENANCE OF A TEMPORARY TURNOUT. THE SALE OF LOT 8, BLOCK 6 SHALL NOT CLOSE, NOR SHALL A BUILDING PERMIT FOR LOT 8, BLOCK 6 BE ISSUED, UNTIL SUCH TIME AS McMILLAN LANE IS EXTENDED BEYOND NE PLAT BOUNDARY TO EITHER A CUL -DE -SAC MEETING SPOKANE COUNTY REQUIREMENTS OR TO A CONNECTION WITH MISSION AVENUE, AT WHICH 'TIME THIS EASEMENT FOR TEMPORARY TURNOUT SHALL BE TERMINATED. NO DIRECT ACCESS SHALL BE ALLOWED FROM LOT 13, BLOCK 1 TO MISSION AVENUE THE , OMMON AREAS TRACTS "A' AND "B' SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION. THE PRIVATE ROADS, LANDSCAPE STRIPS, AND COMMON AREAS SHALL NOT BE SOLD OR TRANSFERRED, REGARDLESS OF ANY PROVISIONS IN THE COVENANTS TO THE CONTRARY WITHOUT EXPRESS APPROVAL BY SPOKANE COUNTY, AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED SUBSERVIENT ESTATES FOR TAX PURPOSES TO THE OTHER LOTS CREATED HEREIN. TRACTS "C ", D. 'E', AND "H' ARE THIRTEEN FOOT (13') WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIPS AND TRACT ° F ° IS A FIVE FOOT (5') WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION. SPOKANE COUNTY IS HEREBY GRANTED THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS TO ALL PRIVATE ROADS, LANDSCAPE AREAS, COMMON AREAS AND /OR DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. NO MORE THAN ONE (1) DWEWNG STRUCTURE SHALL BE PLACED ON ANY ONE LOT; NOR SHALL ANY LOT BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING ADDITIONAL LOTS, OWNERSHIP OR BUILDING SITES WITHOUT FIRST FILING AND RECEIVING APPROVAL OF REPLAT. SIDE YARD AND REAR YARD SETBACKS SHALL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMITS ARE REQUESTED. THE StttIACKS INDICATED ON THIS SUBDIVISION MAY BE VARIED FROM IF PROPER ZONING APPROVALS ARE OBTAINED. USE OF PRIVATE WELLS AND WATER SYSTEMS IS PROHIBITED. THE PUBUC WATER SYSTEM, PURSUANT THE WATER PLAN APPROVAL BY COUNTY AND STATE HEALTH AUTHORITIES, THE LOCAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT AND WATER PURVEYOR. SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, AND THE SUBDIVIDER /SPONSOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR INDIVIDUAL DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE AS WELL AS FIRE PROTECTION TO EACH LOT/TRACT PRIOR TO SALE OF EACH LOT AND PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR EACH LOT. THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) IN INTEREST AGREE TO JOIN IN ANY COUNTY - APPROVED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND PAY SUCH RATES AND CHARGE AS MAY BE FIXED THROUGH PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR SERVICES OR BENEFIT OBTAINING BY THE PLANNING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTING, MAINTAINING OR OPERATION OF STORMWATER CONTROL FACTURES. THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) IN INTEREST AGREE TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY TO PLACE THEIR NAME(S) ON PETITION FOR THE FORMATION OF UUD BY PETITION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW 36.94, WHICH THE PETITION INCWDES THE OWNER(S) PROPERTY; AND FURTHER NOT TO OBJECT BY THE SIGNING OF A PROTEST PETITION AGAINST THE FORMATION OF UUD BY RESOWTION METHOD PURSUANT TO RCW CHAPTER 36.94 WHICH INCLUDES THE OWNER(S) PROPERTY. PROVIDED THIS CONDITION SHALL NOT PROHIBIT THE OWNER(S) OR SUCCESSOR(S) FORM OBJECTING TO ANY ASSESSMENT(S) ON THE PROPERTY AS A RESULT OF IMPROVEMENT CALLED FOR IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FORMATION OF A UUD BY EITHER PETITION OR RESOLUTION METHOD UNDER RCW CHAPTER 36.94. A PUBUC SEWER SYSTEM WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR THE PLAT AND INDIVIDUAL SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED TO EACH LOT PRIOR TO SALE. USE OF INDIVIDUAL ON- SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS SHALL NOT BE AUTHORIZED. AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT BY SPOKANE COUNTY OR SUCH OTHER MUNICIPALITY ASSERTING JURISDICTION OVER THE PROPERTY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A DWEWNG, THE DEVELOPER OR HIS SUCCESSORS SHALL PAY IN CASH TO THE CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 356 THE SUM OF SEVEN HUNDRED RFTY DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($750) FOR EACH NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNIT. PLAT OF WARNING: SPOKANE COUNTY HAS NO RESPONSIBILITY TO BUILD, IMPROVE. OR MAINTAIN OR OTHERWISE SERVICE THE PRIVATE ROADS, AND ASSOCIATED DRAINAGE FACILITIES CONTAINED WITHIN OR PROVIDING SERVICE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS DEVELOPMENT. BY ACCEPTING THIS DEVELOPMENT OF SUBSEQUENTLY BY ALLOWING A BUILDING PERMIT TO BE ISSUED FOR PROPERTY ON A PRIVATE ROAD, SPOKANE COUNTY ASSUMES NO OBUGATION FOR SAID PRIVATE ROAD AND THE OWNERS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE COUNTY HAS NO OBLIGATION OF ANY KIND OF NATURE WHATSOEVER TO ESTABLISH, EXAMINE, SURVEY, CONSTRUCT, ALTER, REPAIR, IMPROVE, MAINTAIN, PROVIDE DRAINAGE OR SNOW'REMOVAL ON A PRIVATE ROAD OR ITS' ASSOCIATED DRAINAGE FACTURES. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE AFORESAID OWNERS HAVING HEREUNTO SET THEIR HANDS THIS r'' DAY OF ci$.Y , 199(' STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP 8Y: HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION ITS GE]NERAL. PARTNER BY ITS pets 1.143/4 {' BY: DENT BUILDING CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION ITS GENERAL PARTNER 11LiIBERLAdD SAVINGS BANK, A. WASHINGTON CORPORATION ��cecu awe i re M.-f + Sec-refraLr` MORVEST CAPITAL CORPORATION, A BRITISH COL.UMBMA CORPORATION 8) - .-- ITS WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR LAST ABOVE WRITTEN. STATE OF uA *$AVbl>r!/►/ COUNTY OF k THIS r DAY OF •JiPL , 19/' BEFORE ME PERSONALLY APPEARED WN TO ME, OR ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE, TO BE THE POOS1 rear OF HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AND WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT ON BEHALF OF SAID CORPORATION, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCH CORPORATION EXECUTED THE SAME AS THEIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. NOT Y UBUC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF 64/40•40 ∎Alpo ►/ RESIDING IN ` y.JNova STATE OF iii SA, /Af4TAN COUNTY of it iAl4 ON THIS l"DAY OF 19 4 /(BEFORE ME PERSONALLY APPEARED MOWN 10 ME. OR ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE, TO BE THE /ice ^trare , OF DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AND WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT ON BEHALF OF SAID CORPORATION, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCH CORPORATION EXECUTED THE SAME AS THEIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR LAST ABOVE WRITTEN. F‘ NOT Y P'UB AND FOR THE STATE OF #/c�A /,�r'�I �. DING IN Nwls STATE OF lAJASHIN4 L)1J COUNTY OF fray h A Y ®D Q itn w ®wa me ao w. r_„ ., 0 0 0 0 My Conu,s,s;ion Exriros fill 0 `TARY PUS?!.;( s - OF WAS)- 0 0 ON THIS ICI DAY OF 641t4 , 1990 BEFORE ME PERSONALLY APPEARED i/t ; chAEt_ SAN• KNOWN TR ME, OR ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE, TO BE THE EXEC. v. Y. OF TIMBERLAND SAVINGS BANK, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, AND WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT ON BEHALF OF SAID CORPORATION, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCH CORPORATION EXECUTED THE SAME AS THEIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR LAST ABOVE WRITTEN. NOTARY PUBU IN AND FOR THE ATE OF41 tJ RESIDING IN ff o t i 4 AN r =:STATE , OF • K11f OF ON THIS,-1.1 DAY OF > � ' ':3 19 ; ; BEFORE ME PERSONALLY APPEARED +3 KFWN TO E, OR ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE, TO BE THE 1 $ 1 t. CT€3,.1, - . OF MORVEST CAPITAL CORPORATION. A BRITISH COLUMBIA CORPORATION, AND WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT ON BEHALF OF SAID CORPORATION, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT SUCH CORPORATION EXECUTED THE SAME AS THEIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL HERETO AFFIXED THE DAY AND YEAR LAST ABOVE WRITTEN. NOTARY PUBUC IN AND FOR THE S AEE *OF 's RESIDING IN SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE /AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF , 19 AT M. IN BOOK OF PLAT AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF DEPUTY THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. • • • • �III I � • .o +t� X 22121 • • ON 4L Liao EXPIRES: Q 7 DAVID E. SCHUMANN. RLS #22121 SPOKANE COUNTY minim DEPARTMENT EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 19_, DIRECTOR, SPOKANE COUNTY UTIUTIES SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER S POKANE COUNTY BUUDING AND PLANNING EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 19 . DIRECTOR, SPOKANE COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 19 FOR SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF . 19 , SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR BY DEPUTY SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 19 CHAIRPERSON, SPOKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL TAXES WHICH HAVE BEEN LEVIED AND BECOME CHARGEABLE AGAINST THE LAND SHOWN WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION HAVE BEEN FULLY ,PAID THIS DAY OF , 19_, SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER BY DEPUTY 2- 19 North Idaho Engineering 4200 West Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 Phone: (208) 887-1171 Fax: (208) 664 -3507 2-s*C SHEET 4 HEETS RIGHT OF WAY \ A\l-NVE PROPERTY LINE - DRAINAGE EASEMENT -� 13.63' RIGHT OF WAY 13.47' ; N29'59'58 "w 20.00' N 29'59'58 "W \o,AP C35 - L = 01'52'1 R = 745.00' T = 12.17' L = 24.33' 0 3 • DETAIL E 8.14' S43'44'29 "W 0 16' DRAINAGE, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT �� °• i N29'59'58 "W 030 • 20.37' 52 � p2 DRAINAGE EASEMENT 1 033 o p -, cS ro F 16' DRAINAGE, SLOPE, AND U11UTY EASEMENT DETAIL I \‘C-‘:\),‘ - b. \ C ar C41 OD C3 X 60 PROPERTY LINE 13.00' N29'59'54 "W 10.00' N29'59'54 "W RIGHT OF WAY PROPERTY LINE 13.03' k3 DETAIL M RIGHT OF WAY 3.00' S29'59'54 "E � st9'91- 0 0 <\ 16' DRAINAGE, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT J f ADDI' (A LANN D UNIT D I A PORTION DF THE S 1/2 DF THE SW 16' DRAINAGE, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT 10.00' 10.00' N00'00'02 "E 54.98' 48.65' .. 54.98' 589'54'16 "E 10.00' N 00'00'02 "E DRAINAGE EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY CD 4 5 DETAIL F S '4- C26 r r ' \9-D..-(% 2 <N \ C27 O = 0017'42" R = 2104.86' T = 5.42' L = 10.83' 20.00' S24'32 50 "E DRAINAGE EASEMENT 2 0 0 0 0 z L16 0 0 tri CO 16' DRAINAGE SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT SPOKANE COUNTY, RIGHT OF WAY 018 RIGHT OF WAY 16' DRAINAGE, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT 12.65' S53'11'05 "E DETAIL J C47 10.00' DETAIL N = 06'41'12" R = 20.00' T = 1.17' L = 2.33' .„ Z rn. Cn FINAL PLAT DF 1/4, SECTION 8, T 25 N, R 45 E, W,M,, WASHINGTON 16.76' N00'00'00 "E Z C28 16' DRAINAGE, SLOPE, 1 AND UTILITY EASEMENT 6 10.00' N00'00'02 "E\ 54.98' 48.65' 54.98' S89'10.10'E 54 98' 10.00' N00'00'02 "E DRAINAGE EASEMENT L = 00'18'40" R = 2154.86' T = 5.85' L = 11.70' m C29 7 3.00' N29'59'58 "W • (3‘ o . N 0 0 0 0 0 z DETAIL G D`MN \_ gP L' 9� 4� 0 0 ..co o 70.00' -0 g N 89'59'58" W DRAINAGE EASEMENT 4 O \16' DRAINAGE, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT DETAIL K RIGHT OF WAY 10.00' 10.00' RIGHT OF WAY OF WAY \ A\ � a V \, p o o S 6 13.00' Jp S29'S9' S8 ' "E 10.00 C38 S29'59'58 "E � DRAINAGE EASEMENT C39 /S`O° 1 16' DRAINAGE, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT DETAIL 0 '(' 4,„ PROPERTY LINE S89'59' ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft North Idaho Engineering DRAINAGE EASEMENT = 08'40'45" R = 20.00' T = 1.52' L = 3.03' TEMPORARY TURN -OUT EASEMENT 7 66 l 7 ° s 0 `- 1 °° 16' DRAINAGE SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 50 10.00' N 00'00'02 "E 48.65' S89'54'16 "E 10.00' C24 AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF AT M. IN BOOK OF PLAT AT PAGE THE REQUEST OF DEPUTY 16' DRAINAGE, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT 9 - N00'00'02 °E 54.98' 54.98' 10 54.98' DETAIL H AUGUSTA LANE 49.98' N8956'51 "W (sy N16' DRAINAGE, SLOPE, /\ •l AND UTILITY EASEMENT C 1 - - DRAINAGE EASEMENT N� 2 0 0� 0 0 0 z. DETAIL L' DETAIL P 25 50 4200 West Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 Phone: (208) 887-1171 w N 0 0 0 0 0 z 0 0 co 0 0 0 70.00' RIGHT OF WAY v: \s o, s «'‘ rn� . v'o. < RIGHT OF WAY 10.00' 10.00' GRAPHIC SCALE 100 Fax: (208) 884 -3507 4004 1a &M5 ,e BEREHAP5D• 4 HEFT: 7 1 X J in in P4 STRIP I ( ° D L19 Li o Y' o (R33) [(2 .3(/)0.00, 30.00' f 30.00' --® 60J00' cfN co v 8 TRACT "G" 1' WIDE STRIP a n 18 V 17 DETAIL "A" GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft. #8109180257 (NOT A PART) FD, 1/2 INCH REBAR W /SURCAP MARKED 'WELBORN PLS 15043' S8 '23'06'w 322.29' 226.45' 25' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEME T rn 5' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT S89'23'06'W 291.47' °- INDIANA AVENUE 226.50' W TRACT 'C' 25.00' 00 f 13' DrxAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT N89'23'06'E 245.23' �♦ 5' FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA UNPLATTED NOT A PART 25' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) 7 0 20 40 80 180 Jr 6 . c ii?,IVER WA T AK F111:\?,S T AD D N (A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMFI:NT) A PORTION OF THE SW 1/4 SECTION 8, T 25 N R 45 E, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGT ❑N L1 \ 02'48'59" 4 R= 700.00' r \ T = 17.21' s L = 34.41' 'o 0 3 V f \ % ,° s _ p 0 \o \-' \ \ • Vi / l \ Cr_ = 36 R = 20.00' T = 6.68' L = 12.89' \.R C 4> 1 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND �\ UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) \ DETAIL "C" 1 5l 5 <R 18 V 17 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) 6 UNPLATTED NOT A PART FINAL PLAT OF 25' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIAr 10' FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA -� S 00'00'04" W 1.29' Ng9 °56'50'W 0 0 0 10' RIGHT -OF -WAY DEDICATION 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) GLE - cr) 0 S 83 45'00" W- 102.81' 83.61' :• 0 S 89'56'50" E 627.62' b = 21'49'39" R = 20.00' T = 3.86' L = 7.62' 0 0 1 13 T o 0 0 0 0 N 0 128.65' EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE 0 N 0 0 0 _ o o O z u _ 90.00' C4 173.60' 44.95' DETAIL 'B" 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE -N AND UTILITY EASEMENT c�0 UNPLATTED NOT A PART 0\41 c1PC4 �� \ %�� L = 40'29 00" R = 20.00' T = 7.38' / L = 14.13' I?, 9 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT E UNPLATTED NOT A PART J 0 0 0 MISSION AVENUE S 89 °56'44' E 2615,78' (RL1) N 89 °56'50' W 2615.78' (M) L = 41'44'43" R = 20.00' T = 7.63' = 14.57 ;' R13 DETAIL "D" 1 EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE 1988,16' 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 8 17 AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF AT M, IN BOOK OF PLAT AT PAGE THE REQUEST OF DEPUTY North Idaho Engineering 4200 West Seltice Way Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 Phone: (208) 687-1171 Fax: (208) 854 -3507 SHEET HEETS 2'-O" 41-4.N NOTE 1 2 BAGKFI 6 GENERAL NOTES 1 GRAVEL BAGKFILL QUANTITY FOR DRYWELLS: TYPE "A' - 30 CUBIC YARDS MINIMUM / 42 TONS. TYPE "B 40 CUBIC YARDS MINIMUM / 56 TONS. SPECIAL BAGKFILL MATERIAL FOR DRYWELLS SHALL CONSIST OF WASHED GRAVEL FROM I" TO 3" WITH A MAXIMUM OF 5% PASSES THE U.S. NO. 200 SCREEN, AS MEASURED BY WEIGHT, MAY BE CRUSHED OR FRACTURED ROCK. THE REMAINING 40% SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF IO% NATURALLY OCCURRING UNFRAGTURED MATERIAL. 3. CONCRETE SLAB SHALL BE GLASS 3000 CONCRETE. TYPE 4 GRATE COVER 0 0 0 SEE l AGE PORTS \,• ;" GONG ' 2 /,, _ 2 • 10' EASEMENT FOR UTILITIES, AND SLOPE SECTION LINE MISSION AVENUE 0' EXISTING PAVEMENT 20' EXISTING 30' 12' TRAFFIC TRAFFIC. 2% MIN. g M pp ORTARED 0 . 4 1 i 11146S T i•1STURBED SOIL TYPE 'A' STANDARD u.. - 6' I' SIDEWALK ONE SIDE ONLY 4' BIKE LANE 2 aslr� 0 SCALE I \T MORTOR IN PLACE -296 FUTURE ACQUISITION 10' TYPE "B" CURB TG - 1.00' ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT GL 'A" 4" (MIN) 6" CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE ABRIG LINER FROM SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SHEET 5-1 IO :I MIN p SLO � , P .. E T O . - 5'-• -1 - -q'. B OUNDARY PRECAST SIDEWALK ELEVATION = E/P+02' I• 4' 2% MIN. NOTE 12 BALL 10' LANDSGALED TRACT 10' 25' OR SLOPE CATCH POINT R IS 21' 208 TREATMENT AND SNOW STORAGE 15' SIDEWALK 2% MIN. T /G +02' 4. SEE STANDARD PLANS FOR PRECAST CONCRETE DETAILS. 5. ADJUSTMENT BLOCKS SHALL BE CEMENT CONCRETE. 6. PRECAST RISER MAY BE USED IN COMBINATION WITH OR IN LIEU OF ADJUSTING BLOCKS. 1 CL "TYPICAL GRASSY SWALE DESIGN" 8. LT "TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENT GONROL" 4" GONG.M 6E NOTE 3 5: TYPE 4 GRATE COVER 28' MISSION AVENUE TYPICAL ROAOIY SECTION FROM STATION 13 +13:46 TO STATION I6 +65.08 -2% ORYLL 5 T 0.6. MIN. SWALE DEPTH = TG 2.00' EXISTING GROUND 7 4' 25' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT. 2% MIN. ••1"• MORTARED ADJUSTMENT RINGS M 1' ISTURBED SOIL DRnE11 - rr0P X MORTOR IN PLACE 2` ASPHALT G0 « RE PAVEMENT :- - 6' CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE INTERIOR STREET' SEGT I ON FROM SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SHEET A - 1 SCE NOTE 2 SHOULDER EDGE PAVEMENT OR TOP FACE OF CURB ABRIG LINER 11' 4'-4" 10" $ASE " DRAIN HOLE llETAI PLAN 4' -8' DIA: --•1 f . • 1 12 RYI FI 1 B SEEE .: ELEVATION pRYInlEI1 RARRIFI .ELAN 10' EASEMENT FOR UTILITIES, AND SLOPE 15ti Mp`X' T 11' 10' .6. » TO 0.6 DITCH SANK ELEVATION = E/P+02' 0 R/W BOTTOM DITCH = E/P - 0.5' \ A \ \4 \ 4\ DRAIN HOLES . (TYP) I I/2" CLEARANCE *4 BARS 0 10" EACH WAY -- 1 .- 3 -- 5 3/4' GENERAL NOTES DITCH SLOPES AND SIDE SLOPES SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN RATIOS SHOWN UNLESS RECOMMENDED BY A SOILS REPORT AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER LIMITS OF EXCAVATION SLOPES HIGHER THAN 5' SHALL BE DETERMINED BY 50115 TESTING. . DRAINAGE SHALES SHALL BE HYDROSEEDED PER TYPICAL GRASSY SWALE DETAIL. 3 '/ I' MIN 3ti\ // • 1 `V r-- 4'-4" SECTION D - D ' 5 3/4" II I/2' SECTION G-G STANDARD PRECAST DRY LL DETAILS FROM SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SHEET 5-2 HARMONY LANE EAST STA. 11+05.3q TO STA. 16 +20 6ENERAL NOTE: . CONCRETE ORYWELL ITEMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH THE BARRELS AND CONES REINFORCED WITH 0.12 SQ. IN. STEEL GRADE 40, PER LINEAL FOOT WALL. TOLERANCE OF DIMENSIONS FOR DRAINAGE PORTS SHALL BE tI/2' 3. EACH BARREL SECTION SHALL A MINIMUM OF 6 ROWS OF DRAINAGE PORTS VERTICAL AND MINIMUM OF 10 DRAINAGE PORTS AROUND THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE BARREL. SWALE BANK ELEVATION = E/P + 0.2' 0 R.O.W. HYDRO MULCH WITH HYDROSEED MIXTURE 60% BLUEGRASS 20% PERENNIAL RYE 20% FESCUE SEE NOTE. 4' -8' PIA. 11 � 3" (TYP) 5 - (TYP) 4_3" (TYP) I' DRAINAGE PORT DR 44' FI 1 BAZ ELEVATION t2RA1NA5E PORT � METAL FENCE POST (TYP) 2 INCH X 2 INCH -I4 6A. YIELDED "HOG WIRE" FENGIN6 BEHIND FABRIC (TYP) 48 INCH WIDE FILTER FABRIC MIFAFI 100 X TM OR EQUAL (FULL LENGTH) FASTEN TO H06 WIRE W/H06 RINGS OR STAPLES. LAY FILTER FABRIC IN TRENCH, BACKFILL WITH EXISTING SOIL (TYP ■.I , "N 1 1 ■N111 •.1 1 ••I, 1 U11.WU.N 1 INN■ 1 1N•111 • 1 1••• ■ 1 ■1••• 1 1.•■ 1 IN•• ..N11,...•1 - ,. 1 , 1 ■•• 1 , 111•11 , A1..■ 1 111. • 1 1••• - TRENCH LINE 5 13' E.6. SEE DETAIL 'A' FOR KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL BEGIN STA. 0 +15.00 TO END STA. 4+0452 (SEE SHEET 2) .QUILEAI: NOTES THE TOP OF GRATE SHALL BE INSTALLED 1' LOWER THAN THE PROJECTED GUTTER GRADE. 2. THE PRECAST CONCRETE INLET SHALL BE PLACED ON THE SAME GRADE AS THE CURB. 3. RISER TYPE 2 TO BE USED WITH CATCH BASIN. 4. IN STREET WITH TYPE B CURB USE FRAME TYPE 2 . IN PONDS USE FRAME TYPE I NOTES • • !. • • " 4 • D • CATCH BASIN 4 INLET TYPE 2 STANDARD GATGH BASIN INLET _ INSTALLATION FROM SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SHEET 5-1 EXISTING SOIL BAGKFILL SEE SHEET *I FOR FENCE LOCATION TEMPORARY SILTATION FENGE TEMPORARY EROSION / SEDIMENT CONTRO I. WHERE POSSIBLE, MAINTAIN NATURAL VEGETATION FOR SILT CONTROL. 2. TEMPORARY SILTATION FENCE TO BE CONSTRUCTED AROUND PRYhEI L INLETS AND AT MAJOR INLETS TO SHALES 3. ALL SILTATION FENCES SHALE BE MAINTAINED IN A SATISFACTORY CONDITION UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT GLEANING AND /OR CONSTRUCTION 15 COMPLETED AND THE PERMANENT DRAINAGE FACILITIES ARE OPERATIONAL. 4. PLACE ADDITIONAL'HYDROSEEDIN6 AS REQUIRED. DRAINAGE SLOPE AND UTILITIES EASEMENT BEGIN STA 4+0452 - BEGIN S 4+0452 END STA. 4+0452 R.O.W. VARIES PROJEGTED ROAD GROSS SLOPE MORTARED CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RISERS (H1N1141M ONE RISER, SEE NOTE 3) 2 r. 25' 1.5' 5' .5 SECTION "BB-B' 3/4" J 3/16' //" SQ. EDGE PAVEMENT OR TOP FACE OF CURB 1 ...--1/4" SQ. 21 5/8" 26 3/8" 24" G.O. 26 3/16" DER 5KID 1�ESIGN DETAIL . 26 3/4' 34 1/8" E TION A -A • b •f- 2'1/32" 3/4 1 i 3/b" -4. -. --{. N ION J-4 ► &W AVAV' 6' (TYR) SECTION A -A TYP I GAL 8' MAX. wwi two +III VARIES 31 I MAX. VARIES O5' -i N. .6:512161,11.Q= DITCH SLOPES AND SIDE SLOPES SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN RATIOS SHOWN UNLESS RECOMMENDED BY A SOILS REPORT AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER LIMITS OF EXCAVATION SLOPES HIGHER THAN 5' SHALL BE DETERMINED BY SOILS TESTING. 2. DRAINAGE SHALES SHALL BE • HYDROSEEDED PER TYPICAL GRASSY SWALE DETAIL. 20' 20' 2.56 MIN. 2% MIN. •....N' .. Lt.411. rV., 1. S.wi saw .., 4,", Y. =.,1•v • CEMENT CONCRETE CURB, TYPE '5" GONG. SIDEWALK (TYPICAL) - 3' ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT INDIANA STREET 5EGTION FROM SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTVENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SHEET A-I IN. SRASSY MIN. 1 118 LBS. 13 11 STANDARD METAL FRAME ORATE COVER TYPE 4 FROM SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HORKS SHEET 5-15 TOP OF RETENSION DAM TOP OF 6RASSY SHALE IvAging■alirff =sr. AviillrivA■A■ VARIES 10' SEE NOTE 2 LOCATE DRYWELLS A5 SH0141 ON PLANS SHALE HATER PETENSION DAM TYPICAL SHALE HATER RETENTION DAM DRYHELL PLACEMENT PER PLANS SHALE DESION NOTE: THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAININ6 THE EROSION PREVENTIOWSEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES IN GOOD WORKING CONDITION UNTIL THE VEGETATION 15 ESTABLISHED AND DRAINA6E FACILITIES ADJACENT TO THE PUBLIC R/W ARE ACCEF'TED BY THE COUNTY; AND THAT THE DEVELOPER SHALL THOROUGHLY CLEAN THE DRYWELLS PRIOR TO THE COUNTY'S ACCEPTANCE OF THE DRAINA6E FACILITIES ADJAWITITHE PUBLIC R/W. '13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE, - AND UTILITIES EASEMENT galzata FRAME SHALL BE GRAY IRON CONFORMIN6 TO A5.T.M. A48-q0, 6RADE 30. THE :GRATE SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON CONFORMIN6 TO 2. METAL FRAME AND 6RATE TYPE 4 SHALL ONLY BE USED WHERE SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS. IT SHALL NOT BE USED AT A CURE3 LINE 3. DRAINA6E SLOTS SHALL BE PLACED PARALLEL TO THE DIRECTION OF FLOW. 4. FIT TOLERANCE SHALL BE I/8 WELDING 15 NOT PERMITTF_D. SECTION 5-5 MULCH WITH HYDROSEED MIXTURE 60% BLUE6RASS 20% PERENNIAL RYE 20% FESCUE SEE NOTE. MIN. WEIG 168 LBS. • 13' 3.5' ALT15MATIVE 140 POND STA. 3+00.00 TO STA. 11+61 0.5' To r _1/2" ALTERNATIVE POND STA. 0+15D0 TO STA. 3+00.00 EXPIRES: 0/23/06 6/21/c15 MCW LEFT T.FL. 2035 2030 CENTERL 2035 2030 0 c rn r H U I a 0 SHEET 1 � EXISTIN6 EXISTING POWER POLE WITH TRANSFORMER (TYPIGAL) FIRE HYDRANT' it SATE VALVE EXISTING GROUND FUTURE 10' AG01115MON AREA NOT A PART NOTE SAWGUT I' OF EXISTING PAVEMENT ON NORTH SIDE TO FACILITATE PAVEMENT INSTALLATION 0 PR OV IDE A SPNA VA.eit *nem Nte'ear44 Vie itycaterimeoTs aF Akilckw cawry u 1GIA n J s oambs Pdt. "zoa` su&' s ( sim)" EXISTING ASP -IALT 185.93' B. 10+5153 HARMONY LANE TF.G.'2034.09 M.G.R. T.F.C. 2034.41 6' SIDEWALK E.GR 15+90.08 T.F.C. 2034.85 EG R 15+90 .0 T.F G. 2034.85 M.C.R. T.F.C. 2034.41 L =1b2' HARMONY LANE SEE SHEET #3 PAINT cil'IRAlIT�PNI /16 +27.62 MISSION AVENUE 10+00.00 HARMONY LANE F.S. 2034.10 ESION AVENUE M.C.R. F5. 203433 EG.R. 164 F.S. 2034 b3 E.GR 10 +32.41 HARMONY LANE F.S. 2034.12 16 +21.62 MISSI AVENUE IO +00.90 HARMONY LANE F.S. 2034.10 11 +00 L - ?53' PHONE PED. SECTION AND CENTER LINE I8 +00 ��Tr1 T FIBER OPTIC LINE PROTECT IN PLACE t Wtivel,s: u I) 5€ n_'k' rf: 9/23/95 LEFT CENTERLINE 2030 PROFILE !MALE: HORIZONTAL: I " =5O' VERTICAL: 1"=5' NOTE: SEE SHEET 1C FOR SIGHT TRIANGLE DIMENSIONS. 6/20/45 JOM LE END STOP AND STREET 516N PEDESTRIAN RAMP CURVE TABLE FOR ED6E OF PAVEMENT INE CURVE 1 RADIUS I LENGTH I TAN6Bff ' 1 DELTA 90 M2 22.00' 3458' 22.02' M3 20.00' 31.40' 19 .08' 8q•5652* SW 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION & ATIT FIBER OPTIC MAN HOLE. 1— X — 1 I co I M EXISTING ACP EXISTNG CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER EXISTING GUTTE' ELEVATION PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DETAIL 1 FLOW LINE SECTION A 0.10' MIN. PROPOSED GUTTER ELEV. ASPHALT AVEMENT N.T.S CROSS- GUTTER RIDGE MATCH EXISTING 2028.77 TC EXISTING ACP 2028.18 FL 2028.70 TC 2028.20 F 22 +80.53 MCMILLAN LANE CROSS— CUTTER FLOW LINE 2028.12 FL 2028.73 TC 2028.23 FL SAW —CUT AND TACK COAT RIDGE 2028.22 LIP OF GUTTER 2028.00 CONC. 2027.90 FL MATCH EXISTING 2028.03 TC 2027.53 FL 2027.77 FL 2027.96 GUTTER TO BE WARPED AWAY FROM CURB AS NECESSARY TO MATCH EXISTING ASPHALT SEE DETAIL MATCH EXISTING 2028.16 TC 2027.66 TC 2028.45 TC 2027.95 FL SAW —CUT AND TACK COAT GUTTER TO BE WARPED AWAY FROM CURB AS NECESSARY TO MATCH EXISTING ASPHALT SEE DETAIL / AREA TO BE REMOVED AND RECONSTRUCTED GRAPHIC SCALE 0 5 10 0 . z a w Z EL" .z < U z zo- i w co 01 cooto to NI- co in 0 O 1 0 N z _0 W D C ' Ce W C J SHEET OF JOB NUMBER 96106 1 1 ti fr1155I0N AVE, NE 10 ` PIrrw a Accoi 'I co, Tian : M I $510J1 A \/ .. 5TREFErscApe ScNe: I/ 0 1. I, P1..,.►.J s M i' a; ioki A•`ia . S P ET CAP . 4 -E ) 1 z71 AND „iv rk • ^r+ VNK puou 4 51 , 1 2 -Eer - 11 2 -EE. .�. 1. i+tiPlzzosaar, M G.a r sw 2UY0 20X2 >= z. 194:2.16ATlo . 9r91 J vl - re, r , ENPpER J M i A AU1.'O1MATIG. 3, ko 4 t ;1,' -1 a141 FoR 1N ORfr T1 ©w ok1 -Y . .1:1- 6 .1.1 fly NoR1 -1 0 121\4E1244 2W VI LL & #P1414 T ©Rtxt 09 , 6 .14 6 ae 1, The Berger Partnership, P.S. 2021 Minor East: Seattle, Washington 98102 (206) 325-6877 {206) 323 -6867 (Fax)_' Landscape Architecture Site Planning CHECKED' BY REVISIONS` *5'/ STORY SIDE YARD 10' UTILITY EASEMENT GARAGE N.T.S. 2.5 BLDG. SETBA\G N 8'° 3'06" E GARAGE 20' PARK AREA i i 3'LAND5C•' : REA (2028) MINI MUM SETBACK D I STANGE TYPICAL LOT SITE PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE 10,419 5F Iq2 1,562 SF 132' 222 ;151 5F 176 6,110 SF 24,820 5F 0.51 AG 8,2 8 5F 105' 221 6,825 5F 105' 230 6,825 5F 6,825 5F 6,825 SF '8;115 5F 28 13,631 5F 1,125 5F 103 1 ,011 5F 102 9,100 5F 9,888 5F 4a 8,0 5F 21 5F 0. ' - 6,521 SF ryj' 6,4315F N 89°56'5" W 235' COMMON. AREA COMMON A REA -• ESS 14661 5F 1,441 5 30 10,531 5F /4 /' 8,125 5F 8,125 5F \ 248 6,564 5F __ - 8,125 5F 46 ,012 5F 8,811 5F 6,126 5F 331 8,306 5F cv 258 6,500 5F 257 b OO 5F 10.' 256 6,414 5F L =2 2 1,318 5F 18' 18' 8,154 5F 2: • 264 1,104 SF 1,064 5F 7,431 5F \V 130 7,800 5F 105 8,960 5F \bP I06 9,100 SF 107 8,591 5F 8,551 SF 8,801 5F 110 10,256 5F 8,481 5F 1,614 5F 012 1,524 5F 1,800 5F 1,800 5F 65' 146 _s 6,924 5F 65' 1,800 5F 8,125 N SF q,166 \ 2d 126 8,248 5F \1 136 1,801 5F 12,851 5F v2 .A` o, 125 1,250 5F \210 124 1,418 5F ip ,000 5F 6,500 1,454 5F \3S 112 10,140 5F 113 8,111 5F 1,061 5F 1,155 5F 63 '3 8,254 5F /0. 1;138 5F 7,762 5F 8,125 5F 33 10,628 5F 1,000 5F 156 A 6,258 5F 1,811 5F O . po o 5F 6 ,500 5F 11,01-14 SF 1,802 SF 6,500 SF L =33' ,625 5F 9,140 SF 1,100 5F 13' LANDSCAPED ;, I5cl 6,234 5F 141 0 6,131 5F 65 3445 - ' 6',6 SF Q'! 23' 122' 10,134 5F 206 11,331 5F - • (2025) 5' FUTURE `GOUI5ITION AREA 682,131 5F 8.19 AG (203 PER.I METES'. =E=i\ G (SEE DETAIL) O 205 °- 11 5F 25' BLD (2033) - (2030) ___ 5 89 °25'00" W 55' *5' /STORY SIDE YARD 10,351 5F 120 21 1,800 5F 20' 1,414 5F 100' 1 202 16,502 5F (2029) -- *15' 'FLANKING 1 1010 n v 10,803 5F 8;115" 135' N 216 8,604 5F 1,150 5F 8,269 5F 16,683 5F '6;136 5F 6,136 5F 03,6 5F 6,136 5F 04' X4 5F 5 2 11,528 5 .1,313 5 q 1,502 SF 187 141 5F 24 6,131 5F -, 50' N 89 °5651" H 11'' 8,545 5 224 6,983 5F •' 221 12,288 5F 1,486 SF 1,450 5F 23 22 8,030 1,521 5F =5 - 6,24E bb' 44 8,031 5F 226 6,118 5F 100 13,TT7 SF 11 14,843 SF \ \ 0 47 7,260 5F \- 1,335 5F L= 6,260 5F 5 675650" E MISSION AVENUE N 8C156 ;EXISTING 50' R.0.1i. 2O' /3O') 20 1;128 5F 140' lc( 1,100 5F 140' 101' 140' FRONT VIEW 6 "xI /4" DIA. STEEL BAR 238 6 6,828 5F 23q F 6,126 5F FROM WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD PLAN H -13a 1,543 SF q,141 SF O r 1,8111 5 NOTE: PLACE BOLLARDS 5' ON CENTER CONNECTED WITH 1/2" CHAIN CREATE PEDESTRIAN AGGE55 BY PLACING 2 BOLLARDS 3' ON CENTER 140' 164' � 14,708 5F SIDE VIEW 66 1,448 5F 1', STEEL GAP PLATE 5 /I6 DIA. DRILLED HOLE 4200 West Coeur d'Alene, Phone: (208) 667-1171 601 10,611 5F 12,582 5F 9;188 SF VICINITY MAP (NO SCALE) EXISTINO R.O 336 8,231 5F 112' 1,310 5F 83' m' 1 l6 10,201 5F 143 5,456 SF 1,800 5F 140' Seltice Way Idaho 83814 9,851 5F L = 43' CONCRETE FOOTING ROUND OR SQUARE / .2, 1,5 SF 117' - R1VER - - = %- 'f L =73' 0 COMMON AREA AGGESS 2615:18' Fax: (208) 664 -3507 PROJECT AREA - p 8 ,561 5F s 266 tr 267 o- 268 tr 261 bp 5F 6,026 5F 6,026 SF 6,026 SF ' L =62' 4 66' 66' 66' _ 1 LANDSCAPED AREA. 12,gg6 SF 1.68 AG North Idaho. Engineering 1,014 5F 301 6,500 271 6,500 5F vs- 273 6,026 5F 66' 6p26 5F 322 8,224 5F 215 1,000 5F 5 ,81°5651"---E 130' 0 283 6,500 5F 140 15,124 5F ' b1 °59'58° W 1019' 145 i 10,012 84 8,360 5F 129' 8,455 5F 8,141 5F 135' 8,831 10,425 5F 10' R.O.l^l. DEDICATION 2'-b' 1'51'58" W 112' 2016 1,000 5F 2 "x4" 2`x4" 4 "x4° 320 6,500 SF 2 - woo 5F (2033)- (2034) - SECTION A -A 45' 20' 50' 15' 55' 1 1"x12' 1"x12 °- 2q8 1,000/ O P- 280 6,500 5F ° 271 6p26 5F 66' 6,118 5 330 10,145 5F 304 6,163 5F 13' 13' 13' 75' 15' \, 15' 6,026 6 .' 66' 66' 66' 65' 6,485 SF 1,850 5F b5' 35' 30' ▪ 30 ° o Q6 1,042 5F 6,500 5F 65' 52' GROSS PROPERTY SIZE NET DEVELOPED AREA RIGHT OF HAY DEDI GAT! ON COMMON AREA LOT INFORMATION 6,366 SF 302 } 1,001 5F GROSS LOT DENS I TY NET LOT DENS I TY S ITE COVERAGE -10' FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA GROU ND, DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERIMETER FENCE RIVERWAY VILLA 16,171 5F 10,118 120' 362 1,810 5F TOTAL \10. LOTS: NORTH OF VILLA AVE. SOUTH OF VILLA AVE. TOTAL MAXIMUM NUMBER LOTS ALLOIAIED BY F.U.D. ACTUAL f3U I LD I NO SITE COVERAGE 16.4 ACRES(I 5 %) 3U I LDINS SIT COVERAGE PERMITTED 3 AGRES(35 %) I'*12' W! POGEAR5 363 1,133 5F 1,508 5F (2022) /-CENTER 1/4 SECTION 8 V _LA VE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SOUTH OF VILLA AVENUE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN NORTH OF VILLA AVENUE !Gib 16 c 365 107.E ACRES 77.2 ACRES 18.2 ACRES 14.8 AGRES(13.8 %) 3.40 DU /AG 4.73 DU/ AG 10.8 AGRES(IO%) NOTE: FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SEE SUBIv=ITTED NARRATIVE. DRAWN BY: -JOM/MBM CHECKED BY: DATE: 03/01/14 J.N. 4004 \GENEMAS.DW6 Rll\/fRV\fAY V A P O .R.' I' 'ON OF 'II 15' ?..O.V1. DEDIGA T1ON - \ z -I-NB I-ANA AUGUSTA r O W S F." _ P 2 5 3� f 0' 71 11 1 ...am exam moms - 1\T s 0UrT'l-[ - V E Sr NOR r \ -S.H. 1/4 SECTION 8 - - ' c o -GEM ENN\1IA .-. TRAIL -- ARL 1 , LEAN - .� - EAST, W . M . IT 99 99 0 " QUARTER TY - WA S EI I -`1 Grim 0 IN LLA SE Cri N 5fENNGH MA`s K--SOU T H 'AST CO \E 5 SPOKANE RIVER. AT SJU L _EVAN �?.OAD. - � .,••••• SPOKANE RIVER • INDIANA AVE. BALDWIN AVE. AUGUSTA AVE. MISSION AVE. -OE OVER 1486.16 �� NA P'r �. ♦ \)c 2 TREE STAKING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE TPZE- 14.1f' A5 FIB 2x2 1,4000 STA e-E9 W/ N :7 1-1 .FOR. WIRE. irt-O" MIN. I -ENGTH 5741 As ePearieD • PNNINE1D" &PACE. Olt MULCH k1ON uMEJ r1 eSEMel ., EGA" e "` -- 13' l.st.t TREE AND SHRUB PLANT NG DETAIL .-:0111 =1111= tl ,_ e" 14-1444 APOUND r864.L NCRT 4-1 /Mk 1r SECTION A ACE , 4'L &1"AN Of IDE.5 1 1/2_ CAL, NOR1 ,� MAPLE. 5O RJR LQUIpAM . ,Th fLU4 •1%Z'' CAL. 5W"1'�Uh1 ' Q,G, 13' L.N.E ,_- - fiCIOvaus STREET T HYSE Hy� I N13114.144 AVE . & 2 P,0. CI`'*,I,L. - n•Jt) ifiRst 4J;t7I1 - Ioj Wad 1. Hs( 5er) M 1 X Cod % mLueeRA6s, 2D% FERE J ktI,AL. • ( , 210 , 2. 1R 'T1vk .161 "ry M edOI %Eta PE k II'E CO E 6.: SY M - t'D AO rOMA11 3, Paz\cs, r 4K1 1 t`f1NJeL1.5 P012. II1/4IF ONLY, SEE. F1 1- PSY 1-1.01Z114 It io Et.i 11 4N ' "RIV - P44AY VILLA & 1 *IF 1414 , 61 fit' &i it S1 -J i t .N 1.1 r LAWS" Pc- AUG 2 3 799 Sp 0 ilamoinumummosi Partnership, 2021 Minor, Seattle, Waa)th ttor! 06102 (200) $26-1077: (206) 323-8867 (Fax) Landscape Archltectuiii: Site PlainnIbj : simarionswamillaIlailimmumesuritil DRAWN BY REVISIONS Ff� • S.o 0 20 40 . 1 GRAPHIC 'SCALE fi0 ( IN r= ) 1 .inch = 40 ft. EASEMENT: FOR CLEAR - ...VIEW TRIANGLE 16' SIDE'W'ALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) N T 0� . ate° 0 • • 02'48'59" R 700.00' T = 17.21' L = 34.41' C) � 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) i 6 36'56'05" .R = 20:00' L = .1.2.89' DLITAIL `�s • 4 1Ah e Y') T6' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) \AO' 1 .3 u CY 7 0 8 U) L 30.00' 60 TRACT "K" 1' WIDE STRIP /. ,A 3. }>- 18 V 17 DETAIL /g #810918p2.57 : <•NIO T A: PART) FD, 1/2 INCH REBAR W /SURCAP MARKED 'WELBORN PLS 15043' 589'',3 0 322.29' 226.45' 25' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND U11LITY EASEME T o . S89 °23 °W 291.47' °- INDIANA AVENUE 226.50' gg .ACT . °C° 8 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 25.00' o . ;fl R N89023'06'E 245.23' 25' SIDEWALK,. DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 5' FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA UNPLATTED NOI A PART 5' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND U11LITY EASEMENT ANITEITD. 18 V 17 -�— . UNPLATTED NOT ..A PART FINAL .. PLA F FDORTION OF THE.. W /4) SECTION 8 T 25 N SPOKANE. C UN9 T, ASHING D 25' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP) EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIA 10' FUTURE ACQUISITION AREA s 00'00'04 "• W 1.29' N89 °56'50'W N 10' RIGHT -OF -WAY DEDICATION i i UDITDR'S CERTIFICATE FILED, Fr1R PtECORD THIS � DAY OF , ' 9 ' AT 1� ; 13 , 00K ' ; M, IN ; 13 , 00K ° = DF PLAT ^ I F,HE I AT ' t HE REQUEST OF ,Lc, /,` 627,62' o a 13 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND I UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP)N = 21'49'39" R = 20.00' T = 3.86' L =. 7.62' 0 0 EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE 'DEVELOPMENT 128.65' 0 LAI O o a � W— 102.81, S g3 "45 00" C _ 83.61' °0 -00' li 5 89 6 ,.. 0 . ce) L I S 89 173.60' o ° 0 0 DETA 13' .IlRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 9 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT R E, WOM. MISSION AVENUE S 89 °56'44' E 2615.78' (RL1) N 89 °56'50° W 2615,78' CM) L. UNPLATTED . NOT Pd PAR ,. p ON = . 40'29'00" R = 20.00' L = 14.13' \� 1 UNPLATTED NOT A PART = 1 r/ 1 EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE p p� 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE 2 4 0 1: 0 4 0 4:4r 0. 41'00' 44'43" �� F,, $� AND UTILITY EASEMENT R = ��.� _ ti'S �.••�,•'.� ` T = 7 63 EXPIRES: sue« 8 17 LINE 1 DIRECTION 1 DISTANCE , Li _ "_ S8924'57'W 15.00' _ L2 " S8956'51'E - 125,00' L3 S0000'04'W 10.00' L4 N8956'50'W - 83.61' -' L5 S00 °03'lO'W 10.00' L6 S00 °02'29'E 50.00' L7 S89 50.02' L8 N89 °56'Si'W 30.00' =. L9 .N30 °00'02'E 25.00' L10 N26 °4 53.52' L11 N89'23'06'E 21.79'. L12 S0035'03E 84,98' L13 N00`34'05'W 3.63' L14 N89'23'06 °E 25.81'. L15 S00 °00'02'W 1.35' L16 _ S0000'02 "/ 15,43' L17 N68 °45'24'E - 21.18' Lib N2959'58'W 15,1' L19 S89 °24'57'W 30.00' L20 `• S00 °34'OS'E 13.17' L21 S00 °34'OS'E 16.81' L22 N0000'02'E 95,00' L23 - S89t56'51'E 45.00' LINE -': ": 1 DIRECTION' R1 ''. ". N14 °00'59'W ; R2" ' N15 °14'32'W R3 N1505'50'\ R4.= N23. °07'32'W R5 N25 °44'01'W R6 ',, . N26'03'14'W R7.>` .. N7211'46'E R8 S6524'36'W R9 S60'26'34'W< R10 S60'38'17'W Ril :- " S3930'47'./ R12" " S2959'58'E R13 N80 ^29'16'E R14 , " . S29 °59'58'E R15 • N29'28'25'W; R16 N23 °28'22'\ R18 •' N1921'52'W R20 S52`11'04'W` R21 ' N16`37'30'W R23 N8743'04'E R24 N09'43'EO'W R25 N07 °32'31'\/ R26 N0852'28 °W R27 -' N40'47'40 °E R28 S70 °07'40'E R29 S6207'59'W R30 S67'23'53'W- R31 S82'36'07'W; R32 N1731'43'W R33 N00'03'IO'E; R34 S00`03'09'W . R35 N09`54'03'W (E.0 P.) INE 2030 2025 2030 2025 0 0 f O 0 0 N 0 CS" N 0 m N O tT' 0 N 0 0 N 0 N O L N 0 H +23.x2 BAKER ROAD 0 +00.00 INDIANA AVENUE EXISTING GE TERLINE G' , F.S. 202 0 •UND N O N 0 0 0 N 0 O cy N N 0 cQe N O B.G.R. 18+83.14 F.S. 2021 0 E.G.R. 0+38.9 FS. 2026.15 r N 0 0 O N M.G.R. F.S. 2021.12 INDIANA A O N 0 0 N O N r N 0 N 0 O N N 0 N Q O N Q 0 N O N N N N O r -= N O N 4) N 0 N 0 N N 0 N 0 tn N 0 N 1 N 0 N 0 N 0 c3; to N 0 N 2030 2025 2030 2025 RIGHT (t.O PROFILE SCALE. HORIZONTAL: I " =50' VERTICAL: I " =5' CURVE DATA FOR TOP FACE OF CURB CURVE RADIUS 1 LENGTH TANGENT 1 DELTA RI 20.00' 31.43' 20.01' 90•01'52' R2 20.00' 31.41' 1941' 89 '58'08' AT! T UNDERGROUND GABLE AND FIBER OPTIC SIGN OFFSET 22.3' R164-1T ATtT FIBER OPTIC LINE RI6HT OF WAY 5' ACQUISITION AREA POWER POLE AND BELL PHONE PEDESTAL. STA 15 +1050 OFFSET 26.8' RIGHT 20'0 2024 7 16400 GATE VALVE SECTION AND CENTER LINE EXISTING EDGE EXISTING OF PAVEMENT , RIGHT -OF -WAY UTILITY POLE STREET LI6HT AND BELL PHONE PEDESTAL. STA. 16+52.20 OFFSET 27.1' RIGHT WA 5tfllT -OFF NOT A PART GRADE ROADSIDE PITCH M PHASE 1 TO DRAIN TO DRYWELL AT STA I6040D0 STA. 0+61.10 INDIANA AVI'Jl11E r moo DESIGN DEVIATION FOR NON - CONFORMING INTERSECTION SEPARATI DISTANCE F.S. ca M.C.R. F.S. 2021.13 STREET AND 6RASSY SW \ 2924 20 POWER POLE STA. 16+52.20 OFFSET 21.1' RIGHT 11� B.C.R. 16+8344 F.S. 2021.50 M.G.R. Ps. 2077.12 E.G.R. 0+38.98 INDIANA AVENUE . F5. 2026.15 •• L :':.13 t 1NG IMPROVEMENTS S LITT AND PHONE PEDESTAI_ 1.67' I 2175 m 5AR<IER NOTE: FOR SIGHT TRIANGLE INFORMATION SC SHEET 1C. 19 +23.82 BARKER ROAD 0 +00.00 INDIANA AVENUE F.S. 2021.q5 WATER ELBOW - 2.83' 36.85 f2 RI 41111k1. Air Illik z a .R. 19+6344 STOP 5I6N B.GR. 0+39.02 INDIANA AV FVE FS. 2026.71 ODD .44 21 +00 0 0 UTILITY AND PHONp PEDESTALS AT*T FIBER 20+50.00 OFFSET 285' R16HT POWER POLE 12' PRIVATE DIRT ROAD STA. 22+6850 MIDPOINT OF DRIVE #8 1 041 &Q25 NOT A PA T 16' PRIVATE DIRT ROAD STA. 23+32.50 OFFSET 15' R16HT r POWER POLE STA. 23+11.20 OFFSET 27' R16141 STREET LIGHT z 1 tJ 1 5 z POWER POLE W/ TRANSFORMER STA. 23+35.60 OFFSET 27' RIGHT 24400 FIRE HYDRANT 5TA 23+50.42 OFFSET 35' RIGHT SCALE: 1 INGH = 50 FEET SEG 8, T25N, R45E, W.M. • EXPIRES: 9 -29 -95 6/1c1M5 .3 LECENI7 STOP AND STREET 516N PEDESTRIAN RAMP • DRY6.®.L CURB INLET 0 0 a al z 0 H W a 0 �. z 0 c� C4 C4 0 0 0 0 + W 0 O <4 0 rti 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 �i a SHEET SEE DETAIL 'A' BAL :'WIN AUGUSTA N J ` 7� C : S89* - 2 - 5 - '06'W 291.47' 226.50' L19 L1(R) 60,00' -•- 30,00' WWI ONO 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 6 027 SF 2 #8109180257 (NOT A PART FA 1/2' REBA1 -, V/ SURCAP MARKE'. 'VELBOR'PLS 15043' N n 226.45' "�T • C17 14 P - 453 Sr 9.726 SF ` Ut I .'D N • t3 • 4 �'• 2 m \.\b"/ 2 a \ 30 ca � \. . �^ a ; 7,532 SF • Co ,, r ('1 � f s r 3C;) \ y d '•7,96, SF :1 • • d -. 1:8 . 9 . 154:16" . 1 '3 . . , � w . .L 1 7,983 4 SF 6,68`s S r� • I 1 r- 1 'Se9•59'58•E N89 I I '03.63' • b� .� •= o try 6,7.36 SF ; 6'E ?i y 103.63' 6 6,736 SF S89'54'16'51 103.63' : �a\ C30 • 103.63' 10 74 6,736 SF , 03.63' :I 589 0 • 6,736 SF • 103.63' -1 589'54'16'Q 12v in `a 6,736 SF - 1' 4 103.63' S89'54'1 13 Qui 9,391 SF� 25' • �S._ 'E W Cu 0 25' 25' rjA . 9010' 2 n: w ' LA 6,52. , SF vi • O r: a: r•10,0 o , 59 56•v _ ° ° � E 6,4 : 1 SF c. • 6 SF'• z �20-•B.S:�'° N89'54'16'V I L2 103.63' •673 SF S89 o 103.63' Sri ` c 6,736 � i ° n N 'S4' 'V N ° o 18 "'59'58'\• 100.00' 3 Z !'" 6,521 SF Q s N89'59'58'V (L1 1 n 100.00' nn • .a2 S ;6,741 SF z N 70.00' 4!'CU - 1 6,737 S F L2a::� TR c o N p o N .: SF i1r TRACT 'A' 62,032 �SF 1.42 AC 1988.16' •\ - V' J "° � . o • S 9,100 SF i \. _ 8.11,1 SF •�cl` } c ^ SG • \'o - '•_t_7 SF - 1• :7 do 2' 7 m cY) 00 8 0' wall 000 OM FOUND 1/2' REBAR V/ PLASTIC CAP RLS #22121 FD. RE -STEEL PIN AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD #4337 FOR W 1/4 CORNET RP'S PER COUNTY RECORD. #8109180257 (NOT A PART) FD. 1/2 INCH REBAR W /SURCAP MARKED 'WELBORN PLS 15043' N89 370.00' (R2) S89'23'06'W 369.88' (M) 32229' UNPLATTED NOT A PART N89•56'50'V N89'S6` FD. SPOKANE COUNTY BRASS CAP AS PER SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORD x#2455 RP'S PER COUNTY RECORD. R 1 V R 16' SIDEVALK, SLOPE, A! D UTILITY EASEMENT (rYP) 25' SIDEWALK, SLOPE„ DRAI'�,•OE AND UTILITY r2ASErv'dT EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIE4' TRIANZ E SEE DETAIL 'B' ti , 1 552.80' , 9 1 627.6E �+__5I ` AVENUE 1 ' TRACT 'F TRACT Z' VIDE STRIP UNPLATTED NOT A PART L14 N.T.. 0 5 6 TRACT 'H' 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT N N TRACT 9,713.,5 J L7 0 0 U) v� A PORTION NO DIRECT ACCESS TO LOTS WITHIN RIVERWALK TO THE WASHINGTON STATE CENTENNIAL TRAIL. IS PERMITTED PER SPOKANE COUNTY REQUIREMENTS, EASEMENT FOR CLEAR VIEV TRIANGLE SEE DETAIL 'D' 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT •••• o 7,257 SF . � s\ 8 L'• A �` _ a` 7260 SF,J 13' DRAINAGE, SLOPE {- o 0 ° ° '02 ° o s J AND UTILITY EASEMENT S , 1'' • ` 4 ACT 'B' 33 :1 x°96 0 o �\ .. © 10,463 8 321 7 \�- a . .1 � N� s 2 0.57 ACF , A'J pAo' ' � s (3 9.335 SF\ r S - 10.2.2 9 382 SF N S6$ As ' �, 3 ▪ 0 6 y p T " '.,5 4 : � 5 �' S. n 6 o y m 7aa3 SF 9 -1 9.781 SF �o.S68.A5 `:1 a o i 8,039 SF p 1 � � ' -4 ,- X15+: ,. r S v , q j � f `, s 0 3 ` - X 7,409 SF��4 � � 1.• (..\ b,� 6 8,6hJ SF ^ , ' 17,739 SF • y98 ' \.: / r 01. � .' V' t�, ��'? ° �� 20'� - ,�3. g pL�`' -------62- -------62- 2 8477 1:F.'01)\ : - \ .;a • 3 1 .b r 7 ' - N 7 •`5 5 SF ( 27.'. i �'� �,y -�, . 16' SIDEWALK, SLOPE A �!z` �, m ,sue' .'11. ti \ t✓ c.- ., !TTY r,•v ):- rr ..T , + O; ,...7"3"..„. '. '"- ,,0 • ,?, z. 4 • r . � ,. 6 L8 W 0 g AUGUSTA LANE S 89 E 2615,78' (RL1) N 89'56'50' W 2615.78' (M) S89 215.00' _ALK Fi S T _AD DITTO F THE S 1/2 _F T ,T SP :KANE 0 0 tab %5 o 13.00' UNPLATTED NOT A PART ,, 8 FINAL E SW 1!4, SCTI L- C_f�' \i" --TEMP ''1', , ?UND ;1ND DRAINAGE EASEMENT i (1 ,1.: : . , :r. ,i ' :, I\ n Ic , \1 cl��.0 : - R °A s � � lnv �� ,��. SURVEYOR'S NOTES T F2 - A C ;Z . 01 \0 1 1J A t \Vfi L rt:::- .' nC do 1�- n SPO . rr{ �r �c � � ov1� -11- _ c E RECDRD INFCRt A 1 TUr ON THIS MAP WAS TAKEN D� STRIP r . <: toV. %L.•r 1A C - G � ^ '�'�l� 1r + ,t 1 jt/ . \ � `���' r / , - ;` . J 1 3 . 0 : 0_ ,, , 1. ) +. ' • ,C / k ',. n-r- ,, APART 13' uTICT • j S :Let: (2, F AT EF r LCPr A :r MEtdT 16' SIDE'.' _K, SLOPE AND UT!L•' EASEMENT (TYP) LY\ v ",:STN.: ?+T FOR CLEAR VIEV TRIANGLE SEE _'. :l AIL 'C' FD. SPOKA \E BRASS CA WIT; ON CENT* •.' L MISSION A` .'EN. AS INDICATED :N Sf''' KA COUNTY CE ^:DER '' fORD 112454 FD S 1: 7ORNER RP'S PER 7DUNT'7 1 ?E' C'"IRT T 8, T 25 N, R 45 E, W, RECORD LABEL (RL1) (RL2) (RL3) (RL4) BOOKS OF SURVEYS! BOOK 27, PAGE 42 BOOK 25, PAGE 83 BOOK 9, PAGE 79 - BOOK 50, PAGE 27 AND SPOKANE COUNTY CORNER RECORDS: !* 4337 #*2455 ik2454 1) f c \ � Q ; \S .C V RIVERWALK FIRST. ADDITION CONTAINS X3.26 _,ACRES GROSS. TRACT 'Y' CONSISTS OF THE PRIVATE ROADS McMILLAN LANE, BALDWIN LANE, HARMONY LANE, AND AUGUSTA LANE, AND CONTAINS 2.42 ACRES. C2U C21 C22 C23 C24 C25 C26 C27 C28 02 9 C30 C31 C32 C33 C34 C35 C36 C37 C38 C39 C40 C41 C42 C43 044 C45 C46 C47 ✓048 1051 C56 RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD 9E:,R:•,' 20_90' 7.14' 3.61' 7.1 d' 758.00' t 3.61 S.95'38'3';' 109.27' 54.73' 1 .09.17' N85'15•15::: 20.00' 3_.43' 20.02' 28.30' N ;5'31_3 ^3 20.00' 31.40' 1_9.98' 28727' S44'58'24'E -- •. 1 20.00' 31.43' 20.02' 28.30' S45'01'35'v ' - 600.00' 40.16' 20.0 40.15' S3 9' _ �� d•58'2.9' 14.45' 7.56' 14.14 S69'54'3?*::. _ 725.00' 18.67' 9_34' 18.67' N117'03'59" 625.00' 267.95' 136.06' 205 `iC S28 •3a 3 'C 1 ' 0 ' '5,"1 7745' 'SA - rJ ; +S,Ci._ 4 +' SN' 2: -b , . ' h , CURVE TABLE Jd .J;, 1 CC :6' 2 8:3 1:1.56 :5 ~'C 758 00' d 0t :' 12 7! ' 4 . 8 1x 49.67' •' 1 ' i97_ 24.BJ 49 .; d t 6^ J2. 20.00' 31.40 ,C,q8_ 1.07 1476 4 4 32 - 28_27 S . 58 'S c., n ' 5 , �..40' 1 98' .27 S44 _ 58 25' r .5• 2' I : 20 ' 31 2' 3r 28 28.30' 545 ; C ;.1 ^'?' _ • 16 435.00' 16.19' 8.10' .19 N28 56'00'L' 02 J ' 435.00' 79.2.3' 39.73' 79.12' N22'3N 56 ^�- --1-U7.23:_'-'0_.97- 20 00' 3065' , -• 435.00' 9. :_� 2.74 561 20 �� tf �•, 4,1' 46.00' 21193'-'81.20:-2580:: 3.02 45_9f Nr3 D ; 20.00' 28.26' 11 ^ 7 ` 25,97. -- -.. 20.00' 24.O ' 13.70' X2.60 X34 �5 ,_ 20, 1 27 r 7 � `J_G - 493 ' .. :9 :58 J't: 8 20' ` ) 24.0 1 3.7 0 22.60 4i ,3 �ry; _ :0. 2 .73' 1 7 , ,+ 2.73' N1,:3-60.5•1451.24-7.1;;;•: �� . 758 6_96' 3.48 ; 6.99 7 8, t3;' 42_ 84.82' N 5 sr•r ` 3 745.00 2Jd:7' 104. 2_1,24i.84_5_772' 07.,9 .,.:;:21. 2 4i1 't 2C_30 34 etc' 13 2 .0 . S5 2000' _).,3 , . c 26 ' 1 3. B 222...88C1): 8 •SC' !2514'3j ' :-'s.--' ` 2 22- 0 00' 7 1 . 3.61 7.11' S! r 20.00' i •SS 20.00' 2 ?6' r�• 7'„ • N41)11-4.36.. 70000'' 2 2•bu t Ir , JO 79' " 3 , ' 7. ta_ y .1 750_00' 5.79' '. 9' _ - - 600_00' 217.8b' = 5.79' ti.' i';%';� • J 21.88 S17'22':'-;•- 750 JO' ;3.12 21.57' 43.12 N17'58 3 _ - i 20.00' 2�i6 18.32' 8 27.02' N2? 27'o &'E E:;� tY,; 2.00' .6 , ' 2 § - . - 8 - 2 -7- k6 - 7 7 3 - 1 7 1 - 9 ' -•� 74 89. 44.57' 88.99' N69•57 0, J . 685.00' 2 33 2.43' !22 241.16' S70`08'2i' 672.00 235.73' 119.09' 234.52' N7C _ 5• GRAPHIC SCALE • 100 0 50 100 ' : .. 200 � e ! +a ( LN F1-1.1..7 ) . 1 inch = 100 ft ACCURACY STATEMENT TH:S TD'S c -'�, \ 'WAS PERFORMED I � J Ir" r�r - EL� ^I US_N..i A N . AX PX 0!` 1n SECOND THEODOLITE r � RL'' \Ir DT T , rte_ .r- ,-r-' l n TRAV ..S` -� • _ WITH WAC -S , AN . -_ -_ Tr _E n _,_^AN" -p •3 2 -1 - -' , 0-90 SECT :O., 'C, -RS_ METHODS WERE ') 2O'7'2 3' i T HE BA_`.!: OF BEARING FnR THIS MAP wr : , -, SEC-rT' - .AP T THE �,/r-S•r I T,�E OF THE ^,S. LN8 ., AK_.N AS S 00 °35'03' E. TAKEN FROM 1 '.: AT BL CK L 7 = r,GE 42, C^ U� n `.�`AS' -'T• ; =N'. SURVEYS, S�KANE Cni;NiTY BASIS OF BEARINGS RA:IAL LINE TABLE �.r•'• - -_ :'� . ?> - `J nom: - - ✓ 1, 0; ' 7 y ._ : 4 9 4 3 a c• __ '26 9 , J: t33 ..l'JI 3 R3; _ -- SCO k35 N09'S= 'p.3 %a'. OR r O T-•,rr- - Fr! ED ED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF • - - I9 ---- M. IN KUE'K OF PLAT AT PAGE' AT THE REQUEST OF __ DEPUTY 1 rrr- t N _ SET 1/2 INCH REBAR W/ RED CAP RLS # ER AS NOTED FD, MO N 1 UMFNT i -,S LESCRTBE'D FD. CrII T nl I N R_ --- -NG S CTT :N C rr _ R / 4 R _` - r _2� AS �' _SCRIBE* CA' CU' ATE#, PEINT - C IT I 1 IN . ! SET B'U'LDINC SETBACK SET 2 INCH IRON PIP- W/ BRASS CAP MARKED RLS ;:22' 2, TN MONUMENT CASE RADIAL BEARING FIELD MEASU -- •�I T REO:R I AB B: E CK NLM LINE TABLE SQ9 2.'57. c 1 .77071\17-7 ; JUN 3 f 1SS5 JPCV,A1 E COUNTY ENGINEER:: DIST C-1 : - - 1 15.801 '25 00' No , T aa o fl s OCa Wes Se14Lice Way Phone: (203) 4.367-1171 F x: (205) 664-3507 2581 :5. ,7 6t ,M,5 , r-r- Snc�; EETS T_ .�(" M igs /or, Tr j" l '�trY /40.75 ?5.5/ /40.62 • /G6. /o 2.10 140.6, MISSION AVM. T i. 7/.. 2N V 7 0 ii D ►,� v a4 3 • C 9374;8'4: s.� 71 70� 5 74.08 / © ® - lJ 7 / ;; / / 4 m 7 - Q. 5 ` 4= 33a 2 N p �O m m 2 0� go E E - C � 5 � 8,:> - ro 90� 5, 7i si 7 i � so N A ,.D �,.� so N 90 72 72 6!!` 7644 7BS ,� N / L92- 01 O O O m o h - 5 w m .!o 2 3 4 4 � =J 7! n 7!de 'tlO •72 ® 2 2 76 2 n 7 2 72 7 7 77/./.9 92 9 5 !/9.24 I/O • � v © ® V ©5 a ® v 4 X. I v 0 ! 2. 3 4 ` c `S �v sO 6 0 O Q tz• 4 l ,' , 0 " 0 52, *' 72 /00 • /3 /3 ro /20 A UGUsr.*. Sa COURT /Z0 J - P G/ 1 Nv 1 t /as.9i 184.7/ 146.7/