The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1423A-82Bldg. Permit Fee No. Project Name Address Sponsor's Name jninit 716/0" , c / 4 9a 9 4 1ae 0- V Engineer /Surveyor's /Archi. ect's Name Telephone # Planning Contact Person Date Submitted Description alp File No. P / ;7J b� / 7 Sat Parcel No. c Phone # 9 acP — /99/ rnitials 4 -2,9 -90 (d 9 Fct_. ' 1 ' r cJ� P/ealt et --.mot' p r (- a U- �- - 17 -cf U F ice D `%> ",..c.4 f . -� .)o 6a..se Utc,k.« a.fri.d...o 1 41 P4..- .AList t2r26 g , —1- o 7 _9 t o d " ,t-, _L-0 -, / , = c9 Peed iii t, Y lam+/ 7 d NI AI11MRE4 er .Gars 7 FLAT CMSc.K FEE ��// 1 /, / 4t7 "t / e- Pint- +in...�...7 7`,/ 4 e A /,n.CrN ,AQ,roc✓ D, 43 Rs /S Or Sae/4P6 s I b K P4- .4r Lac.ar/a,.'S,- — 2-.f 0 (C OFF/ci.4a- S6 w/.4l7J,CA'Len I 0 - ScieuEhOls earn.. . z4gw 0 ft ea A.44$I 65 pl7G D 0 led 4a Gal Or O P^ � ADJnc a'air- f/, ��s el 4— // EN Lor . tees e /�i - e A r_ p A /41 PeDlovinoN /a tnoo /v /\ /Foor ST. nor Og_ 3 0 R e� l+.Cd rneweaer 0 g- 77( see r A /U / A- Lor ,4ec.4S 0 t Matt es` Z - R re - .f nicie is I() `/L C- LOSU ne - $c.,e s Pt/ o P4 Pe,.e.-t 4 Pe :e o IC J /&e, -r Srtipv v I—' Az Pro iCO etc N 0 /A. N f 7`t Rio - Cle P Sr4r a, &3r r e r=te Pen lien err n ---/- 2 ,n C- OEDJc R /it OED'CST i n H 0 K- at41AIi44 A L.4NAUAt.6 '6u PIPUEL0A1154CaL 6X— EL-0 D /wsvreAnoc.E C/A. Pt or, lor - n /few an JJoc. ti's W €a4 .grp osrD w4¢Nn.4 g Pc *id IC t mo. - ` '" 9 ado ue-R C /7 e7 DEScki 0 // t A / 3\ 0WAcER5t4tPS 4 9 ,V � N ty Ro.4o P t . - g a l s 10 6F7' P ') • (flO on B F R6 D M►les MEW aat/ o t A,ebA _ 1 /x( /c..km0 w nLED 6 e ME.JrS S // B,' ,EM ,e!Ee e '/6 2 1 A i CngLaalt ba ir% I Alt ' "" I) r September 20, 1991 Mr. Gary Nelson Spokane County Engineers North 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 Dear Gary: Sincerely, KENNETH J. TUPPER Tupper, Inc. R O IS E Fk SEP251991 SPOAANIE COUNT? ENGINEER Re: RidgemontEstates Na. Additio Additio TUPPER & ASSOCIATES, INC., REALTORS v(\kil l/" Block 1 Lot 2 Block 2 Lot 3 Block 1 Lots 1 - 5 Block 2 Lots 1 - 6 If you have any questions, please give ire a call. E. 12929 SPRAGUE AVENUE SPOKANE, WA 99216 Regarding the lots referenced above, I am requesting that, effective immediately, on all building permits you follow the new program established for a $1000 set - aside for swale and sod for each home. PHONE: (509) 928 -1991 Mr. Ken Tupper Tupper and Associates, Inc. E. 12929 Sprague Spokane, Washington 99216 July 30, 1991 RFCE vsT15 AUG 0 2 1991 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Dear Mr. Tupper, We understand through Andy Zachary that you are familiar with our wish to conform to the Spokane County Engineering drainage program required in the Ridgement Estates Development. We have a house built by Crescent Homes on Lot 4, Block 1, Ridgement Estates. (S. 2224 Sonora Dr. Veradale, Wash. 99037) For some unknown reason our driveway was constructed in a way which doesn't conform to the drainage system plan. It is our understanding that the County Engineering Department has formally requested that the driveway be re- constructed in whole. we have appealed to the Engineering Department to consider some design deviation for the following reason, followed by suggestions. I am a right leg amputee, using a wheel chair or battery operated vehicle some of the time. The present driveway elevation is about the maximum grade I can navigate with safety. If a greater grade was needed to conform to the specifications, obviously a new problem would develop. However, if the swale of our drive- way was no greater than the one on the South of me and my exist- ing driveway was not changed I would have no problem. Terry Llghtfoot of your office has suggested the possibility of eliminat- ing the second section of curbing directly south of the south edge of our driveway. His thought was that any water from our driveway would then travel to the street and the gradual grade southerly would carry it to the grass swale at the point at which the curb was removed. Mr. Gary Nelson with the County Engineering Department told me on the phone that any design deviation would have to be requested in writing from you, the developer, despite the fact that the contractor and any sub - contractor were given copies of the approved design plan, and it was and still is their respective responsibilities to conform to the plan or any design deviation that may be approved The following observations were made by the contractor, Mr. Frank Madden, who is constructing the house adjacent to our house. He is very familiar with the 208 plan. When final grading is completed on the south side of referenced house, any drainage would flow toward the transformer and utility area which has no swale. Because of the 'no swale' condition, any water not properly draining off would back up and flood the north side of my property. Therefore, he suggests consideration be given to installing a culvert under the first section of our driveway adjacent to the street. He also wondered if the transformer etc was at the proper elevation. Terry Lightfoot has suggested that the sprinkler system needed for the lawn area, particularly the north portion, be postponed until final determination is made. We have engaged a contractor for landscape site preparation, and he will pick up a copy of the required plan and grade the swale area as required. We wish to seed the swale area as soon as possible, but will necessarily postpone such work until the different problems are resolved to the satisfaction of all concerned. Your assistance to help solve the problem will be of extreme value and greatly appreciated. Sincerely, er fl /9Y Copies to: Crescent Homes Superior Sprinkling Co. Landsite Development, Inc. Gene Nelson, Spokane County Engineering Terry Lightfoot, Spokane County Engineering Andy Zachary Frank Madden TO: File OFFICE O F THE COUNTY ENGINEER FROM: Jerry Sims SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON DATE: August 22, 1991 SUBJECT: Ridgemont Estates No4 2nd Add S2224 Sonora Drive Approach Permit We were contacted by the lot owner, contractor, and home builder regarding this permit. The owner, being confined to a wheel chair, wanted an approach with a standard grade, while the approved plans called for a "208" approach. Many people were involved and were told at different times that other options were open, however, we needed to approve plans before anything else could be done. The first section of driveway was removed prior to submittal of plans for approval. Ron Hormann became involved and decided it is OK to reinstall this section of driveway using a culvert instead of a swale provided we get a plan after the fact. I called John with Crescent Homes with this information and he said he has Simpson Engineers working on the plan. _'�� /7 / ^^� /U /```' | / A // � � / �| \ .// /'^ � /f � �� « // � / / | �/ � PROFILE 13+19.13 PI L= 0.000 L/H Pt.= 0.000 @ 0 Grade= .615% 13+19.13 33"660 13+25 33.696 13+50 33"850 13+50 PI L= 0.000 L/H Pt.= 0.000 @ 0 Grade= .8007. 13+50 33"850 13+75 34.050 14+00 34"250 14+25 34^450 14+50 34"650 14+75 34,850 15+00 35.050 35,050 15+25 35.200 35,250 15+50 35.250 35"450 15+50 PI L= 100^000 L/H Pt.= 35.250 @ 15+50 Grade= -.800% 15+50 35.250 35.450 15+75 35. 35"250 16+00 35,050 16+25 34.850 16+50 34.650 16+75 34.450 17+00 34"250 '/��o 17+50 33.850 17+75 33.650 33.650 18+00 33.375 33.450 18+00 PI L= 50.000 L/H Pt.= 33^783 @ 17+41.667 Grade= -2,000% 18+00 33^375 33,450 18+25 32.950 18+25 PI L= 0.000 L/H Pt.= 0.000 @ 0 Grade= SAG VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = ^615484288954 GRADE #2 = "8 DESIGN SPEED 30 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -5542.85777404 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 0 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 198,89830508 CREST VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = .8 GRADE #2 - -"8 DESIGN SPEED 30 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -475"95338984 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 100 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 198.89830508 CREST VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = -.8 GRADE #2 = `2 DESIGN SPEED 30 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -767.20338984 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 50 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 198"89830508 0+00 PI L= 0+00 0+1B PI L= 0+1R 0+25 0+50 0+75 1+O0 1+25 1+50 1+75 2+00 2+25 2+25 PT L= 2+25 2+50 2+75 3+00 3+25 3+40.57 PI L= 3+40,57 3+50 PROFILE 0.000 L/H Pt.= 0,000 @ 0 Grade= -2"778% 34.080 0"000 L/H Pt.= 0.000 @ 0 Grade= 2,430% 33.580 33.750 34.358 74.965 35.573 36,180 36.788 37.395 37"395 38.076 38"003 38.902 38.610 100"000 L/H Pt.= 36"132 @ 0+71"055 Grade= 4.768% 38.902 38.610 39.875 39.802 40.994 42.186 43"378 0"000 L/H Pt.= 0"000 @ 0 G~`de= 4^756% 44.120 44.568 4o./o/ 3+75 45"757 3+75 PI L= 0.00\ L/H Pt.= 0.000 o L de= SAG VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = -2.77777777778 GRADE #2 = 2.42995169082 DESIGN SPEED 30 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) 187.312545197 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 0 WARNING.", GIVEN LENGTH IS SHORTER THAN CALCULATED SIGHT DISTANCE 198^89830508 SAG VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = 2"42995169082 GRADE #2 = 4.76767327161 DESIGN SPEED 30 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -71.097580144 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 100 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 198.89830508 CREST VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = 4.76767327161 GRADE #2 = 4.75555555556 DESIGN SPEED 30 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) -114970.478506 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 0 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 198.89830508 PROFILE 0+00 PI L= 0^000 L/H Pt.= 0"000 @ 0 Grade= -2.778% 0+00 34"370 0+1P PI L= 0"000 L/H Pt.= 0.000 @ 0 Grade= 1.134% 0+18 33^870 0+25 33.749 0+50 34.233 0+75 34.516 1+00 34^800 1+25 35^083 1+50 35.366 1+75 35.650 2+00 35.933 35^933 2+25 36"309 36.217 2+50 76.870 36"500 2+50 PI L= 10().000 L/H Pt.= 35.716 @ 1+61.685 Grade= 4.092% 2+50 36.870 36.500 2+75 37.616 37.523 3+00 38.546 3+00 38.546 3+00 PI L= 0,000 L/H Pt.= 0^000 @ 0 Grade= SAG VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = -2"77777777778 Ux*utt *Z = 1.1. DESIGN SPEED 30 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) 117"553091913 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 0 WARNING... GIVEN LENGTH IS SHORTER THAN CALCULATED SIGHT DISTANCE 198.89830508 SAG VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = 1.13362068966 GRADE #2 = 4.09230769231 DESIGN SPEED 30 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) 27.3133293 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 100 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 198,89830508 � July 16, 1991 Mr. Gary Nelson Spokane County Engineers North 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 Re: Ridgemont Estates No. 4, Addition 2 Dear Gary: As you know, I would like to delete the swale in Ridgemont Estates Noi 4, Addition 2, Block 2, Lots 2, 3, and 4. We are ready to complete the work on Block 2 confirmation at your earliest convenience. Please find enclosed the revisions to the questions, please give me a call. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, KENNETH J. TUPPER, Pr T.D.C., Inc. , Lot 2 and would appreciate written drainage plans. If you have any TUPPER & ASSOCIATES, INC., REALTORS E. 12929 SPRAGUE AVENUE SPOKANE, WA 99216 PHONE: (509) 928 -1991 SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that ELLER CORPORATION (CONTRACTOR), as "Principal ", and SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA (bonding company), a corporation organized and existing under the taws of the Sate of WASHINGTON, as "Surety ", are held and firmly bound unto Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, as "Obligee ", in the penal sum of TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,001100), lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which the Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severalty firmly by these presents_ WHEREAS, said Principal is a contractor to the owner of a tract of land in Spokane County divided and platted into lots and known as RIDGEMONT ESTATES #4, 2ND ADDITION, and being located in Section 25, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M, in Spokane County, Washington, and said County has required that a bond be furnished in an amount sufficient to pay the construction costs for the installation of sod all in accordance with those Plat Roadway Improvement Specifications and plans dated JULY 11, 1990, and to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Engineer; such improvement to be completed not later than JULY 1I, 1995, unless such date be extended at the option of the Spokane County Engineer. Upon failure of the Principal to comply with the requirements stated herein within the time authorized, and upon delivery of the written notice thereof by Obligee to Surety, the Surety shall be obliged to the Obligee up to the penal sum of this Bond. The obligation of this Bond shall be kept in full force and effect until, in the opinion of the Obligee, the requirements herein stated have been satisfied, in which event written release will be given by the Obligee, the Obligee having sole right to grant such release. SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED this 6th day of FEBRUARY, 1995. FT 1 FR CORPORATION Principal By: (Typed Name/ Title) r VIA) Bond No. 5800776 • SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA Surety Byca Lois Stewart, Attorney -in- ,Fact: (Typed Name/Title): FEB 8 X995 KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: POWER OF ATTORNEY That SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, each a Washington corporation. does each hereby appoint kkokm W. MERRILL; WILLIAM DINNEEN; W. W. WELLER; LOIS STEWART; JOANNE TONANI; CARLA HOLT; GEORGE C. SCHROEDER; LINDA TICHEY; RHONDA A. NELSON, Spokane, Washingt its true and lawful attorneys) -in -fact, with full authority to execute on its behalf fidelity and surety bonds or undertakings and other documents of a similar character issued in the course of its business. and to bind the respective company thereby. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA have each executed and attested these presents R A PIERSON. SECRETARY DAN D. McLEAN. PRESIDENT Extract from the By -Laws of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and of GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA: "Article V. Section 13. - FIDELITY AND SURETY BCNDS ... the President. any Vice President. the Secretary. and any Assistant Vice President appointed for that purpose by the officer in charge of surety operations, shall each have authority to appoint individuals as attorneys -in -fact or under other appropriate titles with authority to execute on behalf of the company fidelity and surety bonds and other documents of similar character issued by the company in the course Of its business . On any instrument making or evidencing such appointment, the signatures may be affixed by facsimile. On any instrument conferring such authority or on any bond or undertaking of the company, the seal. or a facsimile thereof. may be impressed or affixed or in any other manner reproduced; provided. however, that the seal shall not be necessary to the validity of any such instrunent or undertaking." Extract from a Resolution of the Board of Directors of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and of GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA adopted July 28. 1970. "On any certificate executed by the Secretary or an assistant secretary of the Company setting out, (i) The provisions of Article V. Section 13 of the By - Laws. and (ii) A copy of the power -of- attorney appointment. executed pursuant thereto. and 011) Certifying that said power -of- attorney appointment is in full force and effect. the signature of the certifying officer may be by facsimile. and the seal of the Ccmpary may be a facsimile thereof." I. R. A. Pierson, Secretary of SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and of GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, do hereby certify that the foregoing extracts of the By -Laws and of a Resolution of the Board of Directors of these corporations. and of a Power of Attorney issued pursuant thereto, are true and correct. and that both the By - Laws. the Resolution and the Power of Attorney are still in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the facsimile seal of said corporation this 6th day of February S-074/EP 1/93 this 1 4 t h day of October . 19 93 . CERTIFICATE SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA HOME OFFICE SAFECO PLAZA SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 88185 No. 0946 R A. PIERSON, SECRETARY 19 95 0 Registered trademark of SAFECO Corporation. g SURETY RIDER r - ant". p. S P O K A N E Yr7 l -� . OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer U.S. Bank 9208 E. Sprague Spokane,Wa. 99206 Dear Sir or Madam: A DNISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director RE: Ridgemont Estates No4 2nd Addition P1423A Tupper & Associates k v " ECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA FNFRCLINRI.IRANCF.CLIAARAM V.C1c.AAACmrA Please be advised that Savings Assignment No.1160432314 issued by your company as surety for installations of roads and associated drainage facilities for the above mentioned plat, dated January 16,1990, in the current amount of $2,200.00 may now be released. If you have any questions, feel free to call our office Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer February 13, 1995 74-6,7t David A. Berto Plat Compliance Surveyor 1026W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 456 -3600 FAX: (509) 324 -3478 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer -E jame '..jahindton.)Thc. W ::%01 Ma'n Ave, 1 L.L00 Hcekane,Na. 9 Oaar Sir or Madam: ES714 No .4, c1 cid P1424 alier Corooration o u INT r me A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director 21eai:,e ne advised tnat tsend Numtier ISS2.2 '2Y Hafeco e' :;merica as ri=iiv for intallation of dae.is and asr,ociated drainage facilities for the above Jlentioned °lat. dated January 11. bht current •mmint of . 7.400.00 May now )'educed r42.000.00 (two thoui;and L_L. dollars). If you have ',Inv duetion„ feel free to call C - TfiC9 Very truly yours. 'rionaid C. Hermann, Spokane County :Engineer David H. 7 ertn Ldmp'iance i:urvayor 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 • (509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 de Inter- office Com unication To From Subject Form 327 —C.R. OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Datai / •INI•••••■ Ww c: \wpdoc \dave \memo \items OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TO: TOM YAKE FROM: DAVE BERTO D -a• DATE: January 24, 1992 SUBJECT: BOND ITEMS Ridgemont Estates No 4 2nd Add P1423A The bond for the above mention project is for the following items: 1) All the items on the approved road and drainage plans to include the sod for the "208" Swales. 4) We haVB aaparate bonds from Ken Tupper & Eller for this plat. A letter dated 1/15/91 to Ron Hormann specifies which order to release the bonds. Dear Sir or Madam: S P O 1{ A N E OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER • Sedgewick James of Washington, Inc. W 601 Main Ave. Suite 1400 Spokane, Wa. 99201 Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director RE: Ridgemont Estates No 4,.2nd Add. PE 1423A June 11, 1991 O T.J N T Y A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Please be advised that Bond Number 5672333 issued by Safeco Insurance Co. of America for roadway improvements for the above mentioned subdivision, in the current amount of $19,000.00 may now be reduced to $7,400.00. If you have any questions, feel free to call our office. cc: Tupper & Assoc., Inc. N. 811 Jefferson Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer J, rry Sims Plat Inspector SEDGWICK JAMES JUN 1 :3 1991 SPOKANE JUN 13 199 Spokane, WA 99260 -0180 (509) 456-3600 FAX (509) 456 -4715 SAFECO aURETY RIDER INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA G NERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA FIRST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA HOME OFFICE: SAFECO PLAZA SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98185 To be attached to and form a part of Type of Bond. SUBDIVISION ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT BOND Bond No 5672333 dated effective January 11, 1991 (MONTH, DAY, YEAR) executed by ELLER CORPORATION (PRINCIPAL) and by SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA (SURETY) in favor of SPOKANE COUNTY (OBLIGEE) In consideration of the mutual agreements herein contained the Principal and the Surety hereby consent to changing By By THE BOND PENALTY From NINETEEN THOUSAND AND NO /00 -- $19,000.00 To SEVEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED AND NO /00 -- $7,400,00 Nothing herein contained shall vary, alter or extend any provision or condition of this bond except as herein expressly stated. This rider is effective June 14, 1991 (MONTH, DAY, YEAR) Signed and Sealed June 14, 1991 (MONTH, DAY. YEAR) ller Corporation PRINCIPAL Helen M. Eller, President TITLE SafeAo Insur4nce Company of America SURETY Lois Stewart rt ATTORNEY -IN -FACT 8F.". JUN 1 91991 SPIVS& E r.:1IAT' ENGINEER ^^""" as PtihcipaIr as Surety, 5-443 R12 10/86 PRINTED IN U.S.A. january 15, 1991 Mr. Ronald Hormanp Spokane County Engineer North 811 Jefferson Spotane, WA 99260 Dear Mr. Hormann: It is mutually agreed that funds for work completed will be ' released in the following order: ��^ .~ � wv 1. Work completed by the funds set aside by Capital Source. 2� Eller C6pOratiOn's bond for the sewer improvements. Eller Corporation's bond for the drainage work. Savings set aside by Tupper & Associates for sod. • Thank you for your attention to this matter. Kenneth J. Tup Tupper & Associ es Date \ Charles Elle, M Jr. Date Eller Corporation Use to document all meetings with external parties dealing with County position on proposals. 7 tie -e. r g //'' Meetings With: V L c., {�-1 f Represente4MT: erl'c'pPGV C �� S!'""1 County Attendees: ,go--"Jr/ /�� w / "�� / Specific Topic(s): ,Y P lcC & 6o~01- — f e C / GG.!! o -`''�C e c o �. et Proposals Presented: / �l� ' �h�! ' a-re C � � t �,�Cc"� v 5d is -- (Le f fGV 1.- 6,..-, 41, / l3 /Q�--. !c (�e v Sdivi` o Ce 5 ' s r � tr - 0 a i de cd , LA) e r c. cc 10 e._c t a_ /e flw /'4 Jet c a� 6 9 ee l/ /ems e i t,` rl c t / / (C S O K! ! 1 r H i i t p y / o -su (Arc u., --e'r e Ta re, rAi 5. ,r U °"-ces a-._ c P u ct of e / 7Z c- rt / orc /'t o . - w�P ! ` o f ©a- c--- f o v^w..s . Carroty Pusiiiuu Stated•: �"�� Was There Concurrence? -5 ( he-(/ i GU) 7-0- v -S , 509 MEETING RECORD Date: / 03 -9 File No.: Pe ittf- ,( 711.a7 u, J - u-e �a Distribution: 1) Project File 2) Division Head q 3) Co. Engineer b 4) Attendees L:1 Use back or additional sheets for detail of meeting if necessary. TO: i 'ia' 5r wt v /hJ °�V S — cot) E&) Ec �& SUBJECT: ?i T sEWLONT .f 4 — Z../J t'D /top 1 y f c DATE: 7 -7_c5 - 5 A RT G 0 I S A Cop Y C7 A s-c_oc Pc-At 7E2 �/0042 CO,4 /yt e t rS . Ti-1 r 5 CvPY S f IM S ac1t-1 ALL TNC 2&C; Ul2ED Go2f2Ecr(0 -)S AN7 DEDI Tog_ y Li4/J(re pee be tt —rn fit r E - ( Pc 4T( c.) tT14 7 4E. R ( Ro- 4 1- rr age -PTnn"-) 69 G -rice Moc0ovl6odT CL/,..ENCE E. SIMPSON ENGINEERS, .AC. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS N. 909 Argonne Road Spokane, Washington 99212 Telephone: 926 -1322 Fax: 926 -1323 9101090105 DECLARATION OF COVENANT In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of RIDeeFP4c.IT t rpras so. 4 - 2W• MsennnJ (hereinafter referred to as the "Development "), the undersigned covenants and agrees that: 1. The subdivider /sponsor will construct the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 2. A lot is served by a private road when: a. the only road frontage tor the lot in the Development is on the private road, or; b. a lot having frontage on more than one road(public or private) constructs an approach to the private road. 3. The owner(s) of any lot created by the Development or alternation thereof and served by a private road shall be responsible for maintenance; of said private road, including associated drainage facilities in conformance with approved plans on file with the County Engineers office. 4. Maintenance financing of the private roads and associated drainage facilities shall be in a manner determined by the owners of: 9. the majority of lots served by such private road; the majority of frontage of lots served by such private road; c. the majority square footage of lots served by such private road; or d. 5. In the event such private road, including associated drainage facilities is improved to Spokane County standards for public streets, and the County is willing to accept the dedication of such road and facilities, each lot owner shall execute any documents necessary to accomplish such dedication. 6. Owners of lots within the Development who are served by such road, may nue and recover damages and attorney's fees from any owner of any lot within the Development which is similarly served who refused to participate in the road and drainage facilities, construction, financing, and maintenance. 7. WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, or maintain or otherwise service the private roads, including associated drainage facilities, contained within or providing service to the property described in this Development. By accepting this Development or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued for property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind of nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road, or associated drainage facilities. 8. This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road, and drainage facilities as provided herein. STATE OF WASHINGTON)SS COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) O IE On this 024 day of /tact/ , 1991, before me personally appeared Ken th J. Tupper known to be Managing Partner of Sullivan South Enterprises, a Washington partnership, and also known to be President of Tupper and Associates, Inc. as the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged the same to be his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes herein' mentioned. Kenneth J. Tupper presented evidence that he is authorized to represent all the partners in said partnership. Hf ., f .�. ;',,,, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand.arTd N °; official seal the day and year first above written°' ;,,,. My commission expires /— Y /9 ?/ g � Notary Public in the State \of Wa'shingten Residing at .7=a -At.- , \ Wasb, lg gton ` fy \ 0 TUPPER & ASSOC. 12929 E. SPRAGUE AVE. ATTN: KEN TUPPER cc: Spokane County Planning Dept. cc': Spokane County Engineering cc: Simpson Engineers SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE COMMITMENT NUMBER 1 The following matters affect the property covered by this order: X Paragraph(s) No. B and C of our Second Plat Certificate are eliminated. X Paragraph No. A of our Second Plat Certificate is amended as follows: A. General taxes, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) • Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed 45252.0401 45252.0402 45252.0403 45232.0 01 45252.0502 45252.0601 45252.0602 45252.0603 45252.0604 45252.0605 45252.0701 45252.0702 45252.0703 45252.0704 45252.0705 45252.0706 1991 Not available. 1991 Not available. 1991 Not available. 1991 Not available. 1991 Not available. 1991 Not available. 1991 Not available. 1991 Not available. 1991 Not available. 1991 Not available. 1991 Not available. 1991 Not available. 1991 Not available. 1991 Not available. 1991 Not available. 1991 Not available. NOTE: If 17 lots are to be platted, one parcel number may be missing from the above list. (continued) RECEi °tt JAN 8 1991 en* ED:Meeting Transamerica No.: VH- 150637M Customer No. Seller Buyer /Borrower . r rr. SPONANC COUNTY COURT HOu5C October 2, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: A 4/1 MAzv_ GARY NELS Planning Engineer U PUBLIC � WORK„ DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 The plans and specifications for.Ridgemont Estates IV 2nd Addition have been approved by the Spokane County Engineering Department. Upon either the work being 100% completed and accepted by the Spokane County Engineering Department or the work being fully bonded, the Spokane County Engineering Department will sign off on the final plat, Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 a f FROM STAR BROKERS - TUPPER &ASSOC1ATES DATE: TO: FAX FROM: COMMENTS /INSTRUCTIONS: O • j. 1 <> • L\`C , . r ��<,1. STAR BROKERS - TUPPER 6 ASSOCIATES EAST 12929 SPRAGUE AVENUE SPOKANE, WA 99216 Telephone: (509) 928 - 1991 Fax: (509) 928 -4250 10.03.1990 09:44 P. 1 THERE ARE .. PAGES BEING TRANSMITTED, INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET, IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CONTACT THE SENDER AT THE NUMBER LISTED ABOVE. THANK YOUI TUPPER & ASSOCIATES, INC., REALTORS E. 12920 SPRAGUE AVENUE SPOKANE, WA 99216 PHONE: (509) 9261991 \Lk.° FROM STRR BROKERS- TUPPER &RSSOCIRTES October 3, 1990 TO WHOM I1' MAY CONCERN: The construction plans for sewering Ridgemont Estates IV 2nd Addition have been approved by the Spokane County Utilities Department. Upon either the 100% completion and inspection by Spokane County Utilities Department or the items being fully bonded, the Spokane County Utilities Department will sign off on the final plat. JAMES A. LEGAT Utilities Engineer 10.03.1990 09:45 P. 2 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that ETTER .CORPORATION (contractor), as "Principal," and SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA (bonding company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Washington, as "Surety," are held and firmly bound unto Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, as "Obligee," in the penal sum of NINETEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($19,000.00), lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which the Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, said Principal is a contractor to the owner of a tract of land in Spokane County divided and platted into lots and known as RIDGEMONT ESTATES #4 - 2ND ADD'N and being located in Section 25, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., in Spokane County, Washington, and said County has required that a bond be furnished in an amount sufficient to pay the construction costs of grading and surfacing to the approved grades and typical section of the roadways of said plat and the installation of drainage structures and such other work as is incidental and necessary thereto, all in accordance with those Plat Roadway Improvement Specifications dated JULY 11, 1990, and to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Engineer; such improvements to be completed not later than JULY 30, 1991, unless said date be extended at the option of the Spokane County Engineer. Upon failure of the Principal to comply with the requirements stated herein within the time authorized, and upon delivery of the written notice thereof by Obligee to Surety, the Surety shall be obliged to the Obligee_up to the penal sum of this Bond. The obligation of this Bond shall be kept in full force and effect until, in the opinion of the Obligee, the requirements herein stated have been satisfied, in which event written release will'be given by the Obligee, the Obligee having sole right to grant such release. SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED this 11TH day of JANUARY, 1991. EJLFR CORPORATION nci By: �"1 Charles T. Eller, (Typed Name /Title) • SUBDIVISION RO1fl HY IMPROVEMENT BOND Vice- President By: Cb(+o (Typed Name /Title) Bond No. 5672333 r SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA Surety Lois Stewart, Attorney -in -Fact •; OFFICE OF TI u: COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. l P.E., County Engineer Sedgewick James of Washington, Inc. W 601 Main Ave. Suite 1400 Spokane, Wa. 99201 RE: Ridgemont Estates No 4, 2nd Add. PE 1423A Dear Sir or Madam: cc: Tupper 8 Assoc., Inc. N. 811 Jefferson A DIVISION OFTIIE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director June 11, 1991 Please be advised that Bond Number 5672333 issued by Safeco Insurance Co. of America for roadway improvements for the above mentioned subdivision, in the current amount of $19,000.00 may now be reduced to $7,400.00. If you have any questions, feel free to call our office. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer 1 - ! Je rry Sims Plat Inspector Spokane, WA 99260 -0180 (509) 456 -3600 FAX 1509) 456 -4715 OFFICE Or It Ili COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Source Capital Corp. E 9016 Indiana Ave Suite 200 Spokane, WA. 99212 RE: Ridgemont Estates No 4, 2nd Add PE 1423A Dear Sir or Madam: cc: Tupper & Assoc. N. 811 Jefferson A DIVISION Or TI IE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.G., Director June 11, 1991 Please be advised that Loan assignment number CLA 631 and 632 issued by your company for roadway improvements in the above mentioned short plat, in the current amount of $43,099.00 may now be released. If you have any questions, feel free to call our office. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer erry Sims Plat Inspector Spokane, WA 99260 -0150 15091456-3600 FAX (5091456-4715 PROJECT Ridgemont Estates #4 2nd DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Drywell - Type A 2) Drywell - Type 8 3) Grate - Type 1 4) Grate Type 2 5) Grate - Type 3 6) Backfill For DW 7) Concrete Inlet 8) C.M. Pipe 10" Dia. 9) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. 12) Precast Manhole 13) Solid lid 14) Ditch Excavation 15) Sod NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Adjust Drywells & Rings 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 16) Monuments 17) Barricade 18) Street Signs 1) 2) 3) 4) BOND ESTIMATE GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade 20) Top Course 21) Base Course 22) Asphalt Concrete 23) Curb Type A 24) Curb Type B 25) Curb Type R 26) Sidewalk NON - STANDARD ROAD ITEMS NAME J Sims UNITS QURNITY EA EA EA EA EA CY ER LF LF LF LF ER ER CY SF EA LF EA OTHER SUBTOTAL CY CY CY Tons LF LF LF SQ YD 162 4382 EA 6 200.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL GRADING AND SURFACING GRAND TOTAL PRICE 1250.00 1480.00 325.00 330.00 320.00 14.70 610.00 20.00 24.60 30.50 24.00 1435.00 300. 00 9.20 0.70 8 160.00 32.00 2 75.00 DATE 11- Jun -91 9.20 10.60 10.60 44. 40 6.20 7.90 7.20 15.30 COST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1490.40 3067.40 1200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5757.80 1280.00 0.00 150.00 1430.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0.00 7,187.80 )ate fZ /12.../9v Inspector SArn„nl_5 Weather a.m. Time Charged Contractor this Day 1 /2 or 1 Other County Personnel Contractor Personnel Classification Diary Section "1) 5,4 rv-c. P1 nnlatCal LS Signing checked .' 1 s REPORT OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER am p 1 2 3 4 5 6 P.m. oar 4/6/)1 R5 Pg of Z Project Name Ri (icy vnon ; Est. #H - Project No. CRP/RID Report No Contractor and /orSub(s) Eller Co. R :11 8,-)ron T.,JnnJ .4-sp il/- Equipment List 1 2 3 4 5 6 r --..• co^+r 6/6/91 /Is 17. Pr./ b) 7 .S) In lira 'lil ker p& re tie —.. •�...— .�s n *S S'2LI trh..t� �rr - ANIAq— =sa Hrs. Used Standby Number 11 WL f nk, e . CO 54i..../. CSsiyt, ri rem: end a IAN [rsl flaw.aC —n un. ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION LOCATION UNITS QTY. QTY. TO DATE INT. INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE fate /Zit t/ O Inspector Weather a.m. Time Charged Contractor this Day Other County Personnel Contractor Personnel Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 P'1n r Te.s Cetnrc& t,' TV &r'r47rAar I ;nt A) e IL" Press,,,. 4,e,r '1 eve S- 5 .I.. :1 n en 4+, Wian Ltp/P.4 I 1`l.) Pe+ror-1-ar ins;rlr. 7ar6j .44 i.,,,.,t r;r,.+� ,,nr! SraMC. wh,1 1,wt_ t,r.e -in I,>,7se _ PIP `t 80 - R I MH 80 ) MH 81 i A tnprtr ' 4 ;psin�f, aC / J:.� wera74 Y'iN r r 3. Diary Section OFFICE 10) Aleed ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION LOCATION UNITS QTY. QTY. TO DATE INT. Signing checked am pm DAILY INSPECTION REPORT Pg Z of 7 -- OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Project Name R ; .11 e Ej/ 7F1 —7 Qe.(4c.ct Project No. CRP /RIb p.m. Report No - or1 Contractor and/or S b(s) Fller(n - ) Tnll Rrvo. /A A;s fJO /6— 1 2 3 4 5 6 Equipment List Hrs. Used Standby Number INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ati.td --L,, January 14, 1901 By: By: Sharon L. Tupper Afl a 8. Renz Hilda E. Renz Mr. Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer North 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99280 R6: Developor/Borrower: Tupper & Associates, Inc. Our No.: CLA 831 and 832 Dear Sir: WE RUNT MONEY" Funds In the amount of $43,099.00 are being held In a special non - Interest bearing account In the name of Tupper & Associates, Inc. for the purpose of assuring completion of Installation of roadway surfacing, Including grading and gravel, storm drainage and monuments In Ridgemont Estates No. 4, 2nd Addhlon, Spokane County, Washington, In accordance with the drawings and specifications as submitted to and approved by the County of Spokane Engineer's Office on July 11, 1990. No funds will be disbursed from this account without the prior written authorization of the Spokane County Engineer. This set aside of Funds will not be revoked without the Consent of the County Engineer. In the event that the completion and acceptance of the above -named Improvements for maintenance by the County of Spokane are not accomplished within a period of one year from the date of this agreement, all funds remaining In the account will be forlelted to the County of Spokane upon written request by the Spokane County Engineer's Office to Source Capital Corporation. It is understood and agreed that upon the forteture of the funds to the County of Spokane, that the County of Spokane will then undertake completion of the subdivision to be accomplished within twelve (12) months from the date of the forfeiture of funds. It is further understood and agreed that In the event of any shortage of funds to complete Improvements, the County of Spokane may have recourse against Tupper & Associates named above. It Is specifically understood and agreed by the parties, that in holding funds for this development, Source Capital Corporation Is not serving as guarantor for any additional costs Incurred by the County of Spokane In the completion and acceptance of the above -named Improvements. ACCEPTED AND APPROVED this \kt day of -- N , 1991. TUPPER & ASSOCIATES, INC. By: By: SELECTORS, INC. DBA SOURCE CAPITAL CORPORATION Arvin J. Wolff, Jr. president OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY . ENGINEER Source Capital Corporation Business and Consumcr Financing • Since 1969 East 9016 Indiana, Suite 200 • Argonne & 1.90 • Spokane, Washington 99212 Phone: (509) 928.0908 • FAX: (509) 928 -0663 TQTPL P.02/02 Bounce Capital January 14, 1991 Mr. Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer North 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 Dear Sir: RE: Developer /Borrower: Tupper & Associates, Inc. Our No.: CLA 631 and 632 Funds in the amount of $43,099.00 are being held in a special non - interest bearing account in the name of Tupper & Associates, Inc. for the purpose of assuring completion of installation of roadway surfacing, including grading and gravel, storm drainage and monuments in Ridgemont Estates No. 4, 2nd Addition, Spokane County, Washington, in accordance with the drawings and specifications as submitted to and approved by the County of Spokane Engineer's Office on July 11, 1990. No funds will be disbursed from this account without the prior written authorization of the Spokane County Engineer. This set aside of funds will not be revoked without the consent of the County Engineer. In the event that the completion and acceptance of the above -named improvements for maintenance by the County of Spokane are not accomplished within a period of one year from the date of this agreement, all funds remaining in the account will be forfeited to the County of Spokane upon written request by the Spokane County Engineer's Office to Source Capital Corporation. It is understood and agreed that upon the forfeiture of the funds to the County of Spokane, that the County of Spokane will then undertake completion of the subdivision to be accomplished within twelve (12) months from the date of the forfeiture of funds. It is further understood and agreed that in the event of any shortage of funds to complete improvements, the County of Spokane may have recourse against Tupper & Associates named above. It is specifically understood and agreed by the parties, that in holding funds for this development, Source Capital Corporation is not serving as guarantor for any additional costs incurred by the County of Spokane in the completion and acceptance of the above -named improvements. ACCEPTED AND APPROVED this \ day of C.��. , , 1991. By: By: TUPPER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Kenneth J. Tupper Sharon L. Tupper Alfons B. Renz Hilda E. Renz WE RENT MONEY By: By:, SELECTORS, INC. DBA SOURCE CAPITAL CORPORATION Alvin J. Wolff, Jr. President OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Source Capital Corporation Business and Consumer Financing • Since 1969 East 9016 Indiana, Suite 200 • Argonne & 1 -90 • Spokane, Washington 99212 Phone: (509) 928 -0908 • FAX: (509) 928 -0663 JAN- 03 —'91 12:12 ID:UTILTY SPO A S S I G N M E N T For security purposes only, /up t - 5fiSSOcea iLa hereby assigns to SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, the following: r era- Ui4G Branch This assignment is " made as security for the full and faithful performance by 724 c /+,5,soan;46.5 of certain roads, monuments and drainage facilities for Rid ,,t &f, t Y&1d4 as specified in the typical section and roadway improvement specifications for said project, dated / 1/. /'79Q , 19 and on file in the Office of the Spokane County Engineer. Any interest benefits accruing under said savings sestriaeate shall remain the property of Tupper ! 74oc Said savings certificate to be released to -17;pfin- F j sp uaicS or any other party only with the prior written consent and agreement of Spokane County. PROVIDED, FURTHER, the undersigned does hereby authorize ,/, 13a. to pay ove ac2c� kane County all or a sufficient portion of the monies in the savings a referenced hereinabove upon written documentation being received from he S ookwie County Engineer indicating that the purposes for which the savings oe- F ictr a was assigned have not been fully and faithfully performed as required and a statement of that amount of money which the County Engineer deems necessary to complete such obligation. Upon receipt of such written documentation,Tu - f,4ssociak,5 hereby authorizes /d S /34 -4/< to release to Spokane County that amount of money requested up to the maximum amount in the savings certificate. DATED this /°o day of STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of Spokane On this 716 day of January , 19 91 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned a nd sworn, personally appeared KENNETH J. TUPPER " aN to me known to be the President ad XXXXXXXXX g X TUPPER & ASSOCIATES the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation; for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. ACKNOWLEDGMENT, CORPORATION Form No. W -14 Savings Certificate Number // GO S3 .73 / y' in the face amount of and held in and by the Bank of DATED this W..9 day of 5aa TEL N0:509- 456 - ^A.5 4253 P01 Secretary DEVELOPER Notary Public Public fle =Washington, residing at t - U — y 2 My appointment expires: OFFICE OF Ti IE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C Hormann, P.E., County Engineer DATE: TO: ATTENTION: CITY/STATE: FAX NUMBER: FROM: COUNTY FAX NO.: N. S I I Ie11 el \011 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET � - /67 /7 2/ 570 k,rLE e rr MFSSAGE/SPECIAL INSTRUCTION: L _ 4/ uq" WA 0a) 200 -01 SO C 0 lJ N w Y A DIVISION OP n IE PUOUC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director . NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): Z C (509) 456 -4715 Please contact S at (509) 456 -3600, should any problems occur with transmission or receipt of facsimile. 001 -ISo -Joao FAX (5Q0).150..1 January 15, 1991 Mr. Ronald Hormann Spokane County Engineer North 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 Dear Mr. Hormann: It is mutually agreed that for work completed ,will i be released in the following order: � � �u. fre 1. Work completed by the funds set aside by Capital Source. 2" Eller Coporation's bond for the sewer improvements. 3" Eller Corporation's bond for the drainage work. 4. Savings set aside by Topper & Associates for sod. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Kenneth J. Tup Date Tupper & Assoc' es Charles Elle , Jr. Eller Corporation \ — \ ^\ ---' Date Use to document all meetings with external parties dealing with County position on proposals. Represented By: I( County Position Stated: 509/6 MEETING RECORD Meetings With: t S /-G 1/ Date: /—/ S 9 File No.: to fit (1 ,-war q c /TcC- County Attendees: 7c ;r7 - c.c.51; km", 5 Specific Topic(s): Gc-5S e !'itT Proposals Presented: jr 0, !L«( /1'1✓ Jtl 5 W , c k 771 / 1T cue /l2 e /o m - cK5 2 .nor, 3eV CL 5 5 7 yn1 nw r4; / D. o/ c J Gv ° -c.-` �r�it�., A {tCc 0 4 .1 Ca ) k a -lA.,r e at 5 7 Al cd e f o ,� rte.e Was There Concurrence? ,41 Jp s cc�t� c � y ; �s w^ 5 ° e - e ' e r 7 S 7 7 1 -e ` t i er/ ' . -., e ' .60 enc.rC / �w 641 `i a,u fl l( o [/ L er ``aPcc55crvy c p ct4.. r awe ac' / 1 h ( S D (let c_ e £ I a G /a' ye.,/ 5 ; fl,e cv[ < ✓u R Distribution: 1) Project File L! 2) Division Head b 3) Co. Engineer a 4) Attendees Li Use back or additional sheets for detail of meeting if necessary. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) PROJECT Ridgemont Estates No 4 2nd Add. NAME J SIMS DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Drywell - Type A 2) Drywell - Type B 3) Grate - Type 1 4) Grate Type 2 5) Grate - Type 3 6) Backfill For DW 7) Concrete Inlet 8) C.M. Pipe 10" Dia. 9) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. 12) Precast Manhole 13) Solid lid 14) Ditch Excavation 15) Sod NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 16) Monuments 17) Barricade 18) Street Signs GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade 20) Top Course 21) Base Course 22) Asphalt Concrete I 23) Curb Type A 24) Curb Type B 25) Curb Type R 26) Sidewalk NON - STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 30ND ESTIMATE UNITS EA EA. EA EA EA CY EA LF LF LF LF EA EA CY SF QUANITY PRICE 0.2 1250.00 0.6 1465.00 325.00 330.00 0.8 320.00 30 14.70 575.00 18.00 24.60 29.00 24.00 1435.00 300.00 2191 8.65 4382 0.50 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL EA LF EA OTHER SUBTOTAL CY CY CY Tons LF LF LF SO YD GRAND TOTAL 177.31 886.5 605. 8 219.3 tivas 8 140.00 32.00 2 75.00 GRADING AND SURFACING DATE 20- Dec -90 8.65 10.60 10.60 42.65 6.00 7.90 6.90 14.75 COST 250.00 879.00 0.00 0.00 256.00 441.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18952. 1 2191.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22969. 15 1120.00 0.00 150.00 1270.00 1533.73 9396.90 0.00 25837. 37 0.00 0.00 0.00 3234.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40002.68 64,241.83 18 3 ate ]L/ I7_/ 90 Inspector SLrr »,R Weather a.m Time Charged Contractor this Day -'/2 or 1 Other County Personnel Contractor Personnel Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 Diary Section Wllnle r rn l ee t.- a) AIee fa aGt :7nc,l J rlfr'S u^ lI( rlryw�a.11s ,� � Hrl r ls.csfp,l a rl.r / s:�, eJe_g L' iS 3) Re : y 4 c� YrArl✓; rS +fir ?,.�-l ileruI.n 11YS,iv -t- 2 1, I9 t 43 / 08 Swale a in 0 5-0 6 :�i ew -s t✓, er I. IV :,...1 $t s; 1 .1 5 jrr .S�'N�{C.'zv," Co 5a7n,J, Sr 6) r kV,., r.l- Si r/r Lifal from ,5&a 2_1(1t3 fro ? 4r77 . (? `f 9 ff' 3; 2. :3 r/ ((�� .) 1 s) /v d y -in' J 3 ".i /" /.H. fr i onn c V J'icl ¢t rc) &5 avec( rICEICtjb - /.Q -Lir', e r ot-e.t �r irh 5o; (- ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNITS QTY. QTY. TO DATE I NT. Signing checked OFFICE ,- cgnfiLl iis REPORT OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1 2 3 4 5 6 p.m. am pm 26. 43 9ctjiA.sA nt ri vtc/ 5 )vvJ pr we. £i�.7in Z fo LOCATION Project Name Ric19 -1pv7L Est y - Z Project No. CRP/RID Report No. Contractor and/or Sub(s) E/lvr C-'. R i I Equipment List Hrs. Used Standby Number Pg of Z INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE hate 1_ /,0 Inspector Weather a m Time Charged Contractor this Day - 1 /2 or 1 Other County Personnel Signing checked DAILY INSPECTION REPORT Pg Z of -I-- OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER am pm 1 2 3 4 5 6 Project Name Project No. CRP /RI p.m. Report No Contractor and/or S b(s) /A1ndl A92/0,yfr Equipment List Hrs. Used Standby Contractor Personnel Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 Diary Section 10) Near,( 1- l''1z 7 /- Seidltea_ line, II) /dead &p i V Se:,re,r' I ;.f,e ]Z) Alee,,F &n P ' 9s- Number ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION LOCATION UNITS QTY. QTY. TO DATE INT. INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ntte 30ND ESTIMATE PROJECT Ridgemont Estates No. 4 2nd Add NAME J Sims DATE 04- Oct -90 DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANITY PRICE COST 1) Drywell - Type A EA 0.2 1250.00 250.00 2) Drywell - Type B EA 0.6 1465.00 879.00 3) Grate - Type 1 ER 325.00 0.00 4) Grate Type 2 EA 330.00 0.00 5) Grate - Type 3 ER 0.8 320.00 256.00 6) Backfill For DW CY 30 14.70 441.00 7) Concrete Inlet EA 575.00 0.00 8) C.M. Pipe 10" Dia. LF 18.00 0.00 9) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. LF 24.60 0.00 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. LF 29.00 0.00 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. LF 24.00 0.00 12) Precast Manhole EA 1435.00 0.00 13) Solid lid ER 300.00 0.00 14) Ditch Excavation CY 2191 8.65 18952.15 15) Sod SF 4382 0.50 2191.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 5) 0.00 6) 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 22969.15 16) Monuments EA 8 140.00 1120.00 17) Barricade LF 32.00 0.00 18) Street Signs EA 2 75.00 150.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade CY 354.62 8.65 3067.46 20) Top Course CY 886.5 10.60 9396.90 21) Base Course CY 10.60 0.00 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 605.8 42.65 25837.37 23) Curb Type A LF 230.2 6.00 1381.20 24) Curb Type B LF 7.90 0.00 25) Curb Type R LF 6.90 0.00 26) Sidewalk SO YD 14.75 0.00 NON - STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 1) 2) 3) 4) OTHER SUBTOTAL 1270.00 GRADING AND SURFACING 39682.93 GRAND TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 63, 922.08 O F F I C E 01r THE COUNTY E N G I N E E R TO: Tom Yake FROM: Jerry Sims SUBJECT: Ridgemont Estat cc: Ross Kelley auk v S a AIL 1244.fi v t , t u.9 t'+ 4.fr D4S IA. EE cb J »51, �r 4 - �d • , 11" S rl.�e `c✓ 1 Gj rY �S •-4rn. 70N@E I >ti SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON s 4th second add. 1 1Ls A.s, 6.P DATE: September 18, 1990 19 ` 7 " a,M -- MR. 7.4 1 99 0 CSC viv — C Cl/ ci j , k t &' - 7 t/ H aJtGL wre. "a r We have received a r•.uest from ponsor to reduce /release the bond for the above mentione project. Please review this at your earliest possible convenience and notify me of the amount, if any, we need to retain in order to assure the completion of the project. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. ij -� Are" ° 16 4 8 „ ,4 30ND ESTIMATE PROJECT Ridgemont Estates No. 4 2nd Add NAME J Sims DATE 04- Oct -90 DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANITY PRICE COST 1) Drywell - Type A EA 1 1250.00 1250.00 2) Drywell - Type 8 EA 3 1465.00 4395.00 3) Grate - Type 1 EA 325.00 0.00 4) Grate Type 2 ER 330.00 0.00 5) Grate - Type 3 EA 4 320.00 1280.00 6) Backfill For DW CY 150 14.70 2205.00 7) Concrete Inlet EA 575.00 0.00 8) C.M. Pipe 10" Dia. LF 18.00 0.00 9) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. LF 24.60 0.00 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. LF 29.00 0.00 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. LF 24.00 0.00 12) Precast Manhole EA 1435.00 0.00 13) Solid lid EA 300.00 0.00 14) Ditch Excavation CY 2191 8.65 18952.15 15) Sod SF 4382 0.50 2191.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 5) 0.00 6) 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 30273.15 16) Monuments EA 8 140.00 1120.00 17) Barricade LF 32.00 0.00 18) Street Signs ER 2 75.00 150.00 NON- STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 1) 2) 3) 4) BOND ESTIMATE OTHER SUBTOTAL 1270.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade CY 1773.1 8.65 15337.32 20) Top Course CY 886.5 10.60 9396.90 21) Base Course CY 10.60 0.00 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 605.8 42.65 25837.37 23) Curb Type A LF 2302 6.00 13812.00 24) Curb Type B LF 7.90 0.00 25) Curb Type R LF 6.90 0.00 26) Sidewalk SQ YD 14.75 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING o 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 64383.59 95,926.74 PROJECT Ridgemont Estates No. 4 2nd Add NAME J Sims DATE 04- Oct -90 PROJECT U �� A l 0 "'1l NAME .�R�I / L o �� Item # 1) Drywell — Type A 2) Drywell — Type B 3) Grate — 4) Grate — 5) Grate — 6) Backfill for DW 7) Concrete inlet 8) C.M. 9) C.M. 10) C.M. 11) C.M. 12) Precast Manhole 13) Solid Lid 14) Ditch Excavation 15) Sod Non Standard Drainage Items Std Page Dwl 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 96/4 Drainage items Type 1 Type 2 Type 3. pipe 10" dia. pipe 12" dia. pipe 15" dia. pipe 18" dia. Bd1 Dwl Dwl BRF G :D Units Quantity EA EA EA EA EA CY EA LF LF LF LF EA Conc _ Inlet Pipe BOND EST FORM Dia 22 L.' / EA SF Pipe Dia Price Pipe 3N CIO 3a z /SD DATE /0'3 -90 Cost Dia OTHER a -i�'1' X 1 :I1 r951 PROJECT NO.- PE1423A DESIGNER- J SIMS DATE- 10/ 3/90 PROJECT DESCRIPTION- Ridgemont Estates No. 4 2nd Addition STREET # 1 NAME- SONORA STREET LENGTH- 490.93 FT. WIDTH- 36.00 FT. BEGINNING STATION = 1319.13 ENDING STATION = 1810.06 INTER # 1 T INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 36.00 SK = 0.00 RAD = 20.00 INTER # 2 T INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 36.00 SK = 0.00 RAD = 20.00 TERM # 1 : CHOPPED TERM # 2 : CHOPPED ITEM SURFACE AREA - ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB TYPE A ITEM SURFACE AREA - ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB TYPE A ITEM SURFACE AREA- ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB TYPE A TOTALS ROADWAY .EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB TYPE A STREET QUANTITIES EXISTING MEASUREMENT 19456.84 S.F.' 1.00 FT. 0.50 FT. 0.00 FT. 0.17 FT. 0.00 FT. MEASUREMENT 13176.22 S.F. 1.00 FT. 0.50 FT. 0.00 FT. 0.17 FT. EXISTING 0.00 FT. MEASUREMENT 15240.40 S.F. 1.00 FT. 0.50 FT. 0.00 FT. 0.17 FT. EXISTING 0.00 FT. QUANTITY 720.6 C.Y. 360.3 C.Y. 0.0 C.Y. 246.2 TONS PROPOSED 955.5 FT. B' STREET # 2 NAME- 22ND COURT LENGTH- 270.00 FT. WIDTH- 36.00 FT. BEGINNING STATION = 0.00 ENDING STATION = 270.00 TERM # 1 : CROSS STREET EXCLUDED EW 0.00 PW 18.00 SK 0.00 RAD 20.00 TERM # 2 : CUL -DE -SRC STANDARD PERM RADIUS = 45.00 RADII = 20.00 QUANTITY 488.0 C.Y. 244.0 C.Y. 0.0 C.Y. 166.7 TONS PROPOSED 622.9 FT. STREET # 3 NAME- 23RD COURT LENGTH- 315.57 FT. WIDTH- 36.00 FT. BEGINNING STATION = 0.00 ENDING STATION = 315.57 TERM # 1 : CROSS STREET EXCLUDED EW 0.00 PW 18.00 SK 0.00 RAD 20.00 TERM # 2 : CUL -DE -SRC OFFSET PERM RADIUS = 45.00 RADII = 20.00 QUANTITY 564.5 C.Y. 282.2 C.Y. 0.0 C.Y. 192.9 TONS PROPOSED 723.5 FT. 1773.1 C Y 886.5 C.Y. 0.0 C.Y. 605.8 TONS 2302.0 FT. Test Na. Station and Ref. to C/L • . to Sub Grade Type of Material and Use iii • • Dills • miN7l PASSING #4 SIEVE PZ 1 REMARKS Opt. Opt. Correct Fide est Max. Corr. Sp (,.y Std. -No- Field Test % Max. 1 50 �' w �,. St i6 r75 "`' CI O & Sac <f1d1 163 7-3 5 37`7, foy_q 1 Z,6`1 /164 95 -y >93t ok Z 2 3rd \V CU 7 +ro rl•-� " 15.7 1.5 - 9.2 97 7, 110.2. IIi• z -69 Io4.6 95.8 3 ce i WAW+/I..c ''' d 15.1 I5.3 8.7 97% sio.z III -3. 2.6 ►oaz 57•L. L- DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT Project Engineer s; inn iEr Contractor Project N`en.Ric -e -Motet. E k.? 1C 23 it REMARKS: Eller Cn SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS Cont. No. E A E joy Date 8/6/90 Page No. 1 of / I SPECItR fc 4 L N Station and Ref. to C/L . to Sub Grade type of Material and Use — 1 1'7 . aNyal • m7Nal PASSING #4 SIEVE 7' li7N ' • 6 REMARKS Opt. Opt. Correct ‘. Fief Test Max. Corr. Sp 6r &t&.. Nu. Field Test % Max. 1 23rd "8" C* 0+73" WttlerAtne – Z. OG Sockf ?/ I /6 -3 6.6 6.'l 3fl 10 /31.'1 ..C'1 IW -'1 9S - S 7957 ok Z /St3 A wa 4rl;,.t ' O .. b S,f3 6» Wi - y t31 1'- 149.'1 ]31.1 943 97.5 3 Sonora 3& It +ors .46-34-,, AA " O Sonoyp sb V ✓ 6.L " � ✓ I3Y. / 194 94.1 4 DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT Project Engineer S;fr hq r• Contractor El/er - -Co /it Proj Nam fmonE Fs/. #K - Znr/ .odd REMARKS: i t 2 ') SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS Cont. No. EAE /O'1 Date 60519 Page No . 1 of IMPECIDRIC. 1 • Test No. Station and Ref. to C/L Re . to Sub Grade Type of Material and Use re iN •71TI ' •'d•Milo PASSING #4 SIEVE r 17 ' •M REMARKS Opt. Opt. Correct& Fielc Test Max. Corr. Std. No. Field Test % Max. / � 1 Se N s . - `i 061 Backf,!l/ /63 7.0 6.3 3570 iDy -9 i 33.i a' y JtZ.B 960 ? 9St on 2 - JS +SO Z-3 5,0,1..r 5604 -s 0 A 13sr1'./c,1-1 Jt 7,0 5,5 ' 133.1 z G.N 130 -Z 97.8 3 , YtZj" Z- 3r0/111wC �. . r 54,4, — y 7,0 6.1 133.1 130 . 98.0 H O +TS 23rd Ct ►: K _ „ J ?. 4 6, 3 133.1 1?- 8.2 96,3 3 - � w� ' _ "s -" /; c -'1 7. 5 7 ✓ 133.1 1 ?13 965 V DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT Project Engineer SA/.,/,,,,..r Fr ii r Contractor Eller 6,, Project�� e die q tr Eib, #']' a / 4_ ,J„.1 REMARKS: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS Cont. No. P AE 1( Y Date 7 / /L /9d Page No. / of / INSPECTOR t� 2 /6: Test No. Station and Ref. to C/L Ref. to Sub Grade Type of Material and Use MOISTURE PERCENT PERCENT PASSING #4 SIEVE DRY DENSITY PCF REMARKS Opt. Opt. Correcte2 Fielc Test Max. Corr. .Spy StsiaNe. Field Test % Max. of 56 zz..d Cb - 3 O6130-,,,kf, I ( /6-3 6.6 5.4 3 ZJ, log,' )3'1.4 z..6 9 i Mt. 96,1 ?,52, oK Z Zrso zz C& - .3 1. 7 15,1 is .o is .o 0-3 9.5 95; 5570 1(0-I- ijo. z Had 11z -( L- '-1 L - 67 106.8 Jo 7.9 5.3 96.3 t 3 zr7S 2z..,LC.t —3 1 r DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT Project Engineer SI »so-rt Ev�r Contractor gl)ar Co. Project ,,Names xrd ry,10,,,; Est, 'y Z.~1 REMARKS: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS Cont. No. EASE lnq Date 7/ /34.97:> Page No. of I iNspEcratxt Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. i he : ' � publ'ic water system, pursuant thd"'h. TER PLAN approved by - .County “and. State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building and Safety Department, and water purveyor, will be= `installed within this plat, and the subdxvider/SPOflS0r will ;.provide for individual•domestic' water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot. No more than one dwelling unit shall be placed on any one lot .nor !shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without first filing a replat. Individual driveway access permits will be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the :'county road system. .The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of - 'ULIDj•by.petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition . includes the owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the' ,owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for jin' conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either '_petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 3,6.94. Lot 3 Block 1, Lot 2 Block 2 and Lot 5 Block 3 as shown hereon are,'dedicated to Spokane'County.to ' be deeded for road purposes forever'at,such time as .adjacent property is platted. .'Use . of> - private. wells and water systems is prohibited. 'The plattor.does hereby dedicate forever the streets shown hereon for public road purposes =•Utility.easements as shown are hereby.granted. ` >Drainage;“easements, as•platted and•shown hereon, which are for ..'the:purpose of installing, .operating and maintaining '.drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are . hereby -granted. The County of Spokane is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all drainage easements adjacent to the public right -of- way.: The property owner shall maintain the 'drainage swale with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with :"optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and;_ of storm drainage water in the drainage,swale as 'indicated by`the approved pl The iproperty owner or his representative shall inform each • ,succeeding.,, purchaser of all drainage easements on the property and hi's-'responsibility' for maintaining drainage facilities within ' saidYeasements. Individual_ driveway access permits 'shall be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. Driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with t - approved plan on file in the County Engineer's'office. (.I) Direct access to 2'4 Avenue from lots_is_prohibited.___ ______ liotw2,_:B1 °dck-- 1 1 - -Lo� ?;TBl:ock_�4;_Lotv1-, - Block 3_and L Block__4� may__-Cr.equire -- non- typacal driveways, depending on (h iveway 'location) Location- - shall' -_be= reviewed- and - approved_ L} County Engl A - ub"I t — sewer s y s t e m w i l l be rnade avai labs e. tr ; pipt: and indiv/i. dual service will, be pra to each iot ;rior to stile: use /of individual on -si sewage disposal systems sheii not be authotited • N WITNESS/ WHEREOF, I'have hereunto set our hand and offized 'my seol t is �� day of , 1990. Sul %van South Enterprises Kenneth iJ . Tupper, 'Man agi.nq'P at t ner 1 r a 1 Ai c c -ess ;1/45- , /70 1-Q !~ { � r vc.) e J Q Q 0 J d reti:1,.,. <�e 1, ( FINAL PLAT ; ' ±)'� RI DGEMION°T ESTATES NO. 4 - $ t AD In ni A 1 ni A 4nQ nr 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 5 CONTRACT: Cfre JO/ 1 • WGT. OF WET SOIL MOLD /5/ /73 filtEMEMMIPMDLIFS MET N COMPACTION TEST DATA BLOWS PER LAYER NO. LAYERS •� �jrt R,SLtiltrY,w;1 D H WT WGT. OF WET SOIL MOLD - O DROP HT S - i WGT. Of � �g WET E O W UNI W I -"/ *i( '�j�j VOLUM OF SAMPLE MOISTURE SAMPL �. �� 1 4; 3. 6 111111. 1015011 M 039111011 a i ia , ow ° RETAINED # 111 —_ °PASSING #4 ■ SOIL WGT. OF WET SOIL DISH WGT OF DRY SOIL DISH WGT. OF WATER WGT. OF DISH WGT. OF ORY SOIL MOISTURE 4 CONTENT tra DRY UNIT WEIGHT JS )oJ - IY3'IMPW:111IU3 � • MU • UZI CLA si C A_ca _cant /! / p M - P OPT. M0 TURF aNTENT MAX.. .DRY DENSITY / F,,� or /1 2 . i >/9 , .T ES`�ED Af CHEC- = - DATE J• /O LOCATI �L 1 -.- .' '•, //l0// 2 ' ' (1L 1 7- REMA KS: 69 007 Pa / / k 10 15 20 25 30 MOISTURE CONTENT - %OF DRY WEIGHT 35 40 STA: 45 160 150 140 Ls. 7 U m J r 1- N 2 O } 120 O 130 110 100 90 124 cien¢ N:w i+ 27 - 0;2 1 4 7 34 CAE -1tf- COMPACTION TEST DATA • WGT. OF MOLD lialatrara (,9 1.0,9 10 . 13.E 11111Golcalll No 5 o]ilaIIIIQ„ Ia111111X,a: • CO METHOD N VMO BLOWS PERLAYERZY NO. LAYERS TAMPER WT. DROP HT. M01.0 OtA. VO UME OF SAMPLE 44 63 L '7. WGT. OF WET sou_ e. MOLD WGT. OF WET SOIL W UNIT W IGH MOIS URE SAMPLE 0. WGT. OF WET SOIL 01511 131.1 PIM ' �3- WGT f01511 OF DRY SOIL OIS WGT. OF WATER �S.7� 2.0. WGT. OF 01511 WGT. OF DRY SOIL MOISTURE CONTENT O OZ . 19 ., 2 2 Z • - _�.• -. - y , , el O ' ■UEW IUE � 22.0 Imo: -([J 3fj an 2 0 Mw K l DRY UNIT WEIGHT ofr 3,4 QL4CJ41hl % RETAINED #4 SAMPLE M RANI AL ANALY I GRAVEL 251. b (0t/o. SAND °4PASSING#4 SOIL CLASSIFICATION: - 33.3 FINES OPT. MOISTURE CONTENT MA %. DRY DENSITY DATE �$ 133 S s i - 1 3-9c D Y CHE BY -OATE J N OB/4. 0 ,TE�f . o� El 11J4' ■lull. aer A 2-11) 0 EMARKS: SG. Il % 2..Y 5 a-? . IMP 5 CONTRACT: 15 20 25 30 MOISTURE CONTENT— 1.OF DRY WE IGHT 35 40 STA: 45 50 1 ESTATES N0.4 Z ADDITION "STORmWATER. DRAINA6E _CALCU P E/`SIN " PC AREA z .2414 IN.? A ?o1AL A Kooks/ t)RWE5 IrnPEK ? 3•G4. S zAGE S'tvg 4 . AVAILAB = 9.5 2500 FT. IN Z 2 LOTS s 2oDo'Pt t loop P ?. • LOT .. �IIDDFTZ t &000 FT• z 157100 e ° STogAGE' 371 'r T. o . .. 1 - - rips v6e'blz4wELL.... 1 3 Dgi ... _. ... (1•0. CFS.. okt)..,._....._.,.__ .._..._..._. 14' a z ... �2 t5 __ .... A 0 <� 'i• z9� z 1/1 PO ft 2- ' GRFSS I `6S0 1 T. — 15 'Ft z 46 FT. 2 y2 IN STotzsGE VOLUME_ g6Qu1RE•D. =_. 910D FT _,>E. . z 12 IN / FT. NO. 12290 5/2-Pto. KWh1 D Z Fa-RE D, J5 ACRE' FOND.... 5 o i- . —t._Z � FT,.., .. z. __ . 4 6`I > 31 .. FT 3 . 1 > 3 , 0 ( '8 7 _ _7 OF - Z2Rri Z__ NDR"i L S W T I-FT• LE S1.0PE 10= FIDGEWloNT ESTPTES NO.* 13--4- l5= gASErv1ENT SWALE BOTTOM - V"'Q -,-15 —a se KENT 1 ••■ C - , �, _ 0 0161 FT /Ft N O�v v_5,10- B'`'LoPE a p)... Flo. 419 IV z.o CROSS -SE C7 ION AL'AREA OF WALE; CONC. C URFS - 1 GO NC. 4f&B CROSS- 5ECT *NI AL- AREA DF SwpLE: 5 i � . � 5 �� r - ►a 4 _ r -15 05 `t' 0.4a— . �� r 0 i ` ±I ''� _ 1q?/ (. it 05 A 2� i- C 1 s ` . V nfil WWII/ 0 0 / O "+ (5 t6 DE) * (4o st 1�' - Z 5.52- n 2.5 Ut = al5 / L = 420)7 N = UNANNEL FLOW VALUES L = 0 TD = 0 CONFUTED VALUES OUR, = il0 = 2,597/ 010 = 1.23 NA = 0.00 ® RATIONAL FORMULA DATE - 5/3790 DESIGNER = K'W PROJECT NAME = RIDGENONT ESTATES NO.4 2N0 ADDITION' DESCRIPTION = STORMWATa'R DRAINAGE V / . SUBAREA 1 = a15' ACRES SUBAREA 2 = 1.07 TOTAL AREA = 1.42 ACRES OVERLAND FLOW VALUES • # • • HYDROLOGY MCNULKIN BASIN A SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .97 SUBAREA 2 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT - .15' COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .33485915493 ( a. DATE = 5!3/90 BOWSTRING CALCULATIONS . DESIGNER = K W MCMULKIN PROJECT NAME = RID6EMONT ESTATES NO.4 2M1) ADDITION BASIN A DESCRIPTION = STORMWATER DRAINAGE � t lrjtcnsity Qdcv^ Vin Vout Storage (min.) (sec.) (in./hr.) (c.f.S") (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) 5.0 3.18 1.51 60S 300 303 7.5 S 473 2:59 1.23 '748 453 295 6.. 0� 2^24 1.07 803 600 203 15.0 900 1,77 .84 887 .900 1200 1.43 .69 934 1200 -206 25.0 1503 1,21 .56 952 1500 -548 30.0 1300 1.04 "47 966 1800 -034 35.0 2 100 .91 .43 975 2100 -1125 40.0 2400 .82 .39 996 2400 -1404 45"0 2700 .74 .35 1004 2700 -1696 3000 "68 .32 1020 3000 -1980 55.0 3300 .64 ,30. 1051 3300 -2249 60.0 .61 .29 1089 3600 -2511 . . 3900 .60 .28 1147 3900 -2753 4200 .50 .28 1201 . 4200 -2999 75.0 4500 .50 .26 1228 4500 -3272 80.0 4200 .53 .25 1248. 4800 - 3552 85.0 5100 .5. .24 1287 5100 -3613 90.0 5400 .50 .24 1320 5400 -4080 9 5700 .49 .23 1364 5700 -4336. . 100.0 6000 ^48 .21 1405 6000 -4595 7.7. �� THE MAXIMUM STORAGE IS\�07.860/ 6 CU. r�y � * The time of concentration is 7"547992 minutes/ The Undeveloped flow out is 1 c"f.s" TEN YEAR STORM CAL[ RATIONAL FORMULA HYDROLOGY = 5/10/90 DESIGNER = K W NONULKIN BASIN A Luigw cirem Ni:ME = RIDGENONT E5iTATE5 NO.4 2ND ADDITION 1271 = 3TORNWAER DRAINAGE 1 = .21 ACREE SUBREA 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = = ACRES COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT =• .9 FLOM VALUES L = = -16 FLOW CTiNaFFED VALUES DUR = 17110 \'( = 0,1139 PT. pErTH of fLow 0.. 2 . 64•111€9- tePRESSIONI (cc INLET C2 0. = (). f VLoVA f k6. 16, (A) ?6. (e. - 3S Q 040 _ Go-) 0, 0, 0-13 .01 (a) DISCHARGE PER FOOT OF LENGTH OF CURB OPENING INLETS WHEN INTERCEPTING 100% OF GUTTER FLOW (b) PARTIAL. INTERCEPTION RATIO FOR INLETS OF LENGTH LESS THAN La DEPTH OF FLOW - y - 1 .02 1 .03 .04 1 ,03 .06 .00. .10 • .2 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I . I I I I I] - I; 1:...1 1 .3 I .4 1 r .3 .6 a .e a Lo 1.0 I I • I � I ' 1_ I I I I l j l I 1 1;1 . 1 V I I I ,S d .8 • I 1 I 1 1 . 1 1 1 I I 1 1 11 1 1 j I : I 1 1 1 1 1 11;k -- -4_ LI 1 I _ 1 I 1 T I i 1T I L I -- 1- ,�- 1-- 1 ' -a —1 I ,I UINfm ala numNNeiii MOM la - MNx4n HMI 0/ L�� iyNN agszunsegranum IIIAOCC x 4angg=i I rl��y % _ 11111_ .03 .06 .08 .10 6 -39 L /La CAPACITY OF CURB OPENING INLETS ON CONTINUOUS GRADE FIGURE 16 .s .10 .8 10 • 1.0 e 0 3 O a O La erm osi BASIN PC?,G. — V. / •z••• : . i7gvE nt5 Eteineen ce..\CGE.MONT ESTATES 140.4 ftst,t)l -- CD.F.vytWt.Tel-?-i. DS ALNAGe C../SLCIAL_TiONS." vneetz pus " .544 047- 2500 FT. 5 to i< 2 z 5y0 'et 12 /550 ET; Tog/. •GE IRC.clu,\RE.n M LOTS e z• 14 SSQ fT " t F -1: = 2. /550 rT. V • 2. F ± — i 5.50 eTi 105 62.5 FT. _ f\c-RE _IF1 "2_09" 51DRAGEE V0/...tAillE•REQUi@ED.= l2. >E• 4-- 12. t ri • -^ zotb" s• t 523 F7. • '2./ PTO 1-1-5 "S 0 Nit> 2. ?7t f • /E 5.52- ft• z 627 fl". St7 603 • - zO 14 -- 14.45 _ . . - 6 -1 z 9•5 -2. T r _ - ir (q ) - •,-• IS RE CEIVE:0 .- 111Ay b i sso F1. IGO z 15 OP C> Pi. _ . . NO. lz29 o 5/a/99 jCWrj lair/ 3 5e- Rt‘sExilENT 11 TOr-.0F•"D.RtVev4ky_--Nam.—\\ A, arcv " .t'L svy AL SLORE FVDGEWIONT 1•10.*/sPD P.D'prrtt)N1 0 °I - 19 (K-'.n i 10 — tsvgALS ••01 1 * O. 0 I (srl FT/FT rcIrTi ottr=- ' Lift 6 tu),,,,Amo_ syw ■-e. S L°P . S 10 CROSS— SECTIONAL oF E.wkLa c 344-1 77- (:) :FE 4- 4 6. > iA ik t 1.01 0.9 I .ukttr - • 0 •// 'Tot:" Of gete•we■cit■I o.oI61 FT/F 8 if 03 k rovq> 0 )T1s2n. C is co rtc cuF.i3 O sit se F . I..— o 4k fir 1 t t , Nik w s ‘4. 5 , (5. z . 5 DATE =y«« DESIGNER = myz + =ecGmm ESTATES m.; m: ADDITION DESCRIPTION =0AV+eDRAINAGE / w SUBAREA ; =.q ,G SUBAREA •lmm COEFFICIENT = SUBAREA : =:w; ACRE: .e. AREA = 3.12 AC RE s OVERLAND FLOW m:+: St .15 N = .4 • .w CHANNEL ow VALUES Z2 _ .172 : = .ma 0 G e COMPLY ED DUR = 9.41 - cn = 2.32 010 = 2.19 • PA : »w C31-1>/, �aa tees w Gvws TMEREFoRE., £ Y S& 6 -4o (S,\mAL FORMULA mmOLOG # «&e•• R: O. '144.9 Qa Co" = O. U asa a -I .. « 7aR yAl d K W MCMULKIN $O /:LA BASIN SUBAREA 2 RUNO COEFFICIENT = COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = v :w G m= LINES ?OR e/ ew m e «arI m ki @ w 2 0.S z _ 5.S5 et t 6 f o»vz o£em ~ 6 m. pet DA = 5/3/90 PROjECT m+ =;y+m7+E� 7 <rQ DESCRIPTION «mm.m DRAINAGE t t (min.) xecg The Undeveloped flow out is TEN YEAR STORM CALC W rOU LKIN }2N \off i ON DOWS,TRING,GALOULAtIONS DESIGNER = Intensity . 210 . (in./hr (c.f.s.). 5.0 200 1.18 « 2.99. 120 :x 2 8. 602 ««! mss. 2. 2.19.1ms5 112.0. -s 2.24 2.11 166 • \ 20 . 449 20.0 i0 1.77 1.66 1818 ,@m . 18 mo 1200 u 45 1898 :400 = mm um uw mi 7.000 -1074 . .o 1800 . 1.04 . .98 1948 2600 w 9 315.0 2106 .91 1962 00 9400 .0 19RR 4300 m: .74 2017 5400 50.0 +m .68 2041 6000 x 55.0 .64 2102 6600 498 . 0 2600 .w .57 2176 00 + 2900 2 .5 2290 7300 5/0 70.0 Leo .m .m 9 2R6 Gm +; 75 .0 !moo 49 9000 -6551 80.1 1900 . .50 2499 „ 12 850 510/ .48 10200 -7677 . 000 .50 2630 10000 17o .0 .49 2715 11100 -8685 6000 .48 .45 27R5 12000 -9205 THE MAXIMUM STORAGE m c, 750 C zd7 « The time of concentration is 9.413653 amt_: 2 c.f.s. 2 ^ % w <7»m m. ft. ) J;a 8 rme (cu. R. E5F.S1N "C_" TOTA L. RECEIVED MAYO -1) 1990 Bounty Engineering 1= CDGEWIONT E_STA7E5 N0.4 2 ADDITION "51 ORMWAT ER DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS" 2 `2.50__ _ - FT. / z . 6 .Z -lo. IN.._. ys___.... . .. ?,._.1.5$ i15D_ FT..- z 250D 'F :L. 3 %3: ,,r _..._ l 6\1.2- -....� �5 FT Y 9-00Fs/ =. ti (p L-0T5 • Lm 2a D0 Ft' -F 1 000 Ft?" Lytiv>s vmw-er -vrov.: - c cS25. F?? -F IS,o FT.'' - GRASS - 158,150 FTz" - .,21 5. FT. P1 0. 122 'iD 5 1 2, /q 0 . KW h1 0 2 , 3 FIRE 000 FT. . Acne U �� ` Z % / 3 ..208 .-STORAGE...VDLU HE _ PEQuIRE.D. . L...�1 $ 025 . FT. _ - sE. 4 0.I FT. .. 12 IN, FT. ST OK A4 E...F Z otAl gab__.._ __.._... 0 2- TYPE. " "s " 5TOf =AGe 2.cFs. o\1 U..... _ _. 20 l4 9 14 +5 14 s 5 FORAGE AVAILABLE °._. -YDND C - /t _✓ /f 4 )..FT, -iE....5..5.Z F.T. z � l t:?5_FT. >_'}oq >.`i 10... 2'tt R - r1 (9. s) l4.92 ti..t5 _.... er - . ToaoF. . PRIV.Ev L . fir a Si...op SWALE. tonowl •• 'S• PT FtD6c ESThtaS 1•1.0. PP pCD geksemENT -- 9 _12 a - o.o i67 FT FT 12-A14 - S o 01611 FT/FT 0.t5-11$ /FT an 11014W‘p..\- s 1.0 Pg. to • CczoSS- SECTIONAL_ A.ei OF 5...wki.-E: • E= e-1 to r 54+1 -- (7.. . 0-s ik * -v-zi- ) -1 4O . Of ...,, 3 l.% Ft \ ,,p , . ..... 1.oi 0.9 1 'KAN a-kr E.p.semerit -9L/Sa 0. D 6, FT /€...T.--afgr WA./ -2 'C V / 77 — • - +-a trig 19() . . CONC.. ettfoE _ cosc. 'eon) .9_71c2vbq . 5 5R s e eve...S .4__1 C_ 5 E C.T 1.0 N /-0.- AC P• 0 F SW F"' C ._____0 4 2.-- _ ( 2._ k )+(il ±_ci -% ii 92-) 5 4 0 - ek- e/ + ( 5: -0.4. C4: ) ±_ei_c.=' A_ .D_Et) z 5 .e-s -7 - FTS.• 2.5 2.0 DATE = 5/3/c/0 DESIGNER = K W MCMULKIN BASIN C PROJECT NAME = RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO.4 2ND ADDITION DESCRIPTION = STORNWATER DRAINAGE SUBAREA 1 = .64 ACRES SUBAREA 2 = 2, ACRES TE)TAL AREA = &3 ACRES COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = /2222:4404959 OVERLAND FLOW VALUES Ct .15 660 N = .4 • = .12 CHANNEL FLOW VALUES L = 130 Z1 = 36 Z2 = .172' .016 • (;) • = .01 TD = .2449 COMPUTED VALUES DUR = 9.00/ 110 2.38 010 = 2,44 OA 2.44 RATIONAL FORMULA FD/DROLOGY 1 ---cV 4 PO NT kt1 k f -01/4 IG. (9- O m'6uavrat_twes VIAPhip..cuemni 1°081 uSe \At- *?" z 0.5 SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .92 SUBAREA 2 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = 1.1/3 V\ at 3.0s1 (.._ k-1 Q 244 3.n1 H .081 (0.7_444 oAvJ " 0.244 0.9 r 771 DTEOInG. 6 W. DC-SP DATE = 5/3/90 DESCRIPTION = 3TURHWATER DRAINAGE � mi n.) BOWSTRING CALCULATIONS DESIGNER = K W MCMULKIN BASIN C PROJECT NAME = RIDGEHONT ESTATES NO.4 2ND ADDITION � I.ptensity Qdev. Vin Vnut Storage (sec.) (in./Fir") (c.f.s.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) 300 3"18 3.26 1310 600 710 9.0 t 5=10 2_3n 2^44 L769 lO30 �97 ' . 13.0 2.24 2"29 1798 1200 592 Vim() 900 1"77 1"81 1965 1800 165 2 1200 1,15 1.49 2055 2400 -345 25.0 1510 1.21 1.24 2087 3000 -91: 30.0 1800 1.04 1.07 2114 3600 -1436 2100 .91 .93 2129 4200 -E071 2400 "82 . 84 2170 1800 15,0 2700 .74 2136 5100 -3211 50'0 .6R .70 2210 6000 55.9 3300 .64 ^6, 22E34 6600 -4316 60.() :600 .61 ^62 2365 7200 -4838 .60 .61 2489 7800 -5311 4200 ^59 2605 8400 - 5795 75.0 .56 .57 2663 9000 -6337 : G0.0 4800 .53 .54 2706 9600 -6294 05.0 5100 .52. .53 2788 10200 -7412 ' 90.0 5400 .50 .51 2860 10800 -7940 95. a 5700 .49 .50 2954 11400 -8416 100.0 6000 .48 "49 !041 12000 -8959 THE MAMMON STORAGE IS/7�9.679G2�0� CU, Fl�� ` '' , The time of concentration is 9"002421 minutes. The Undeveloped flow rut is 2 c.c.s. [EH YEAR STnRM CALC TO: Gpoz 5. N CL SON / RE, S9vKAN'E Country G Ni114EER3" SUBJECT: 1Z11766 I NT £sTATcs NO, 4 1 - 2ND A DD iTMON DATE: 5 / t4 9 (J Aif ail e . -Fur your review are pr■v+s of the s tree -t plans atvd avtcl cLraiwage_ ?law. Also, included are. ` pro-flies 1 Cofie.s 0' -Hite s ormwa^l-er draitiac e. caICAt/cr1-1ons. I - .?TM± ( F AL-01 :scti I/ ) . /N A/N 'v {� )tr (Arv,,4 .A.A4' � —11-.....:-, U �`' dl 3 .. uS eP ilitraLi A � �f• t / ' v 4 ✓ 4 � Q n y l iiAa o••••t Vt - J 0V. O )- q_ et-. v , ¢O r nLLT3 :14,L 14 2-. V 1' rY` 7: C c ., - t4 t.e , CLr,..ENCE E. SIMPSON ENGINEERS, AC. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS N. 909 Argonne Road Spokane, Washington 99212 Telephone: 926 -1322 Fax: 926 -1323 g Crsr- X111 `�Ylc. RECEYVED MAY 16 J% , aunty! Engineering RIc LsTPTES NO.4• 2 kDc>ccr N 41/4 STORvhv , iF - CE-R D12-t\ N(.6E CF.LCtALNTlDNS . 5P.S11V 2.500 FT- / i CoTAt . /._1N..2— _ _Z - .FT --. 1 IN. z PPVT. n w_00F�/ - DT<1VES- 2500 ft z s.-.S IN Z_ rE_ .. __9.4.- 0__-f_t V 1 IN (/ z "' L-OT 8 - - -, OOO -ELL+ woo FTC \MPERVious r 9450 A GRass = _3,2- 15 f ‘`ZO`& STOWAGE VOLUME ..g QUIgaD. 7.. 9.450 ET?. 1/2-I z.. 17 - .( _ riz v STORr.GE 1zEQu■F.Ep • * 2O9 4 STORAGE - _ 3<j e 3' ------ l - T'1? A /nRYWaL - i' 2,0 1 .1• • 3 (O ✓'F.`- owl .STORAGE AVtLLAELE.... PON'D ._. 72 FT '4 5.52 FT. S TO 5 /z / yg Wm N0. 12X10 150:0...FT:z _ F7. - t r "" r.` _.10,c50 fT.z o.2_5 Act?E T - 10,950 1T- = 12 32s FT. Z 0.29 ACRE TOP_ OF 'DRIVEWAY 7C17 "Oked ' PT. ALE 5-vslp‘L_E. orcovil 10— se. T o? Of- 0.0167 F VD C , GWIONIT EST/ NIDAr/ p, • I 32a. RFSEMENT DRwEN11 _ FT F i w - KAN •••1 t0?- 1- /F T 0 13 I? 0.11Q (wa_ OIG2 FT/FT. wrAcIT ftift sLovv- ? 0,t„•_ , y4 F.l.• " kAOS 1.01 0.91 .0.10 • • 2 IT 1 cgoss-scc-rioNNL mzek DE swe,LE: 4 o.o■ Cri F / Fs-WO VA./ rt0. • °FOND (r-wvyi CONC. g ■—• I 0 % 2 _ m or= +( ris Of- Co SC. E:ii.o co N OF . ` 14 /SI■E: : ...Sl . .. t 4S__:..• 5 • -0.4CS 7 ell 0 Tit '1/40 02- 7- / 5 4, '2\5-) • L i A s t '2.).- ''.5 • 0,42 - _:_41 ( tc _p f-l) DATE = 5/1/90 PROJECT NAME = RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO.4 2ND ADDITION' DESCRIPTION = STORMWATER DRAINAGE • . SUBAREA 1 = 2t7 ACRES SUBAREA 2 = .23 ACRES TOTAL AREA = .51 ACRES OVERLAND FLOW VALUES Ct = .15 N = ,4 = .24 CHANNEL FLOW VALUES L = 417 ZI = = .172 N = .016 B = 0 S = .017 TD = COMPUTED VALUES DUR = 7.95 I10 = 2.54 010 = .68 OA = .68 0,ts1 2._ 114 Cc z D.oct L- a z: • - . • • v.-, _ • RATIONAL,FORMULA:MYDROLOG , DESIGNER = K. W MCMULKIN BASIN .D VErtil oF puov4 C.orneg DerRessiDri pa 4 1: - F ,, ov FIG. 16(a) ?6. 6-3ci 0.toti5_ Qoj 0.0 SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = SUBAREA 2 RUNOFF COERFICIENT = COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = 507:: - 1.56 ilc S cun OfeNIN, ca" peeve BOWSTRING CALCULATIONS, DATE = 5/3/90 DESIGNER =� K W MCMULKI�� PROJECT NAME = RlDGEMONT ESTATES NO^4 2ND ADDITION DESCRIPTION = STnRMWATER DRAINAGE The time of concentration is 7^949062 minutes. The Undeveloped flow out is .3 c.f.s. TEN YEAR STORM GALS • .`�^~'�^"� ^ '^� BASIN D t t intensity Odev. Vin ;out Storage (min.) (sec.) (in./hr.) (c.f.s.) (cu. Ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) '5.0 300 3,18 `85 341 90 �51 7.9 )I: . .hB 433 143 290 J0^0 2.24 :60 456 180 15.0 1.77 .47 502 270 20.0 1200 1.45 .39 360 167 25.0 1500 1.21 .32 537 450 87 30,0 1000 1.04 .28 545 549 5 . 35.0 2100 .91 .24 550 630 40,0 2400 .22 '561 720 -159 45.0 2700 .74 . 546 810 � -244 . 53.0 3000 .6e .18 • 574 900 `326 3300 .64 592 '990 -398 3600 .61 .16 611 1080 -467 65.0 3900 ,60 .1.6 645 1170 -52,5 . 4200 .58 .15 1260 -584 ' 75.0 4500 .56 .15 691 1350 -659 ' 80.0 4800 .53 .14 702 1440 -738 ' 85.0 5100 .14 724 1530 -804 90.0 5400 .50 .13 743 1620 . 95.0 57OO .49 .l3 767 1710 -943 / 100,0 6000 m 4 .13 790 1800 -1010 ' _----. - _' _--- THE MAXIMUM STORAGE ISi2B9 548803696 CU Ff.) • ME 11 I 1� 1 1ltl 1 11 1 1 n. 1 1 I � 1 I . I 11 I .,1 1 ..�. Iflaitroir .I 1 1 1 1 . • 1 IIIMPS67e MI D TI It I 1 -i , � � 4_ / - -1- , I t- 1 jTI ;, I ' I , A t H i rfl t ± I II H 1 Ht H 4 � t �1'. `f� -t `/ -# ' 1 1� I I_ 1 _ T i 1 i .. t1 H 1 1 1 1 1 1 Yi t 1 1 1 1 1 o 7 o -- - - L._ ;y -1 11 1 . 1 IY y VA •nlmaiv an n wo 11- 11 fr / 1pvan 1 t 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 j 1 I i l I l flVliflhI + 1 1 1 1 , 1 , I'.1 1 1' rani I - -l- -- I as -- 1 1 1 :;Oriu' 1 - 1 'uwa as un I I . - -+ - - -- 1 I + � -i�1I I El - I I ' I it I �I.I�I L' I 1 1 I ' i•III . 1 I. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I. I I • 1 .I I :I ''1I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I j 4 .I I I 1 I , l / /X / I �-1-F , III 11 , I i I 1 1 11, 1.1 I I 1 1 1 I I'I - : ,, .�� i �� I 1 II i l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , _ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ME • •11•1••u1Pri MI Iflaitroir NI • II IIIMPS67e MI 0/ aW ■ �1'. `f� -t `/ -# ■ � a p 1 ■ 11MS3+- A- I � 11- 11 MIR=UiH I l flVliflhI + I - -l- -- I -- l �� ar 0 I - • 1 I I . - -+ - - -- 1 I DEPTH OF FLOW - y - FEET .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .06 .10 - (a) DISCHARGE PER FOOT OF LENGTH OF CURB OPENING INLETS WHEN INTERCEPTING 100% OF GUTTER FLOW (b) PARTIAL INTERCEPTION RATIO FOR INLETS OF LENGTH LESS THAN La .05 .06 .06 .10 6 .7 L /L CAPACITY OF CURB OPENING INLETS ON CONTINUOUS GRADE 6 -39. • FIGURE 16 1.0 .6 .6 .4 Oa La .10 ,06 .06 .05 .04 .03 .02 .01 1.0 .6 .6 .s .4 .2 .10 .4 .5 .6 .6 I.0 • ER51 N F (i• BASIN "CH 'OF I'T. ALPITIOrl A 1 9C &'4jOU5 RECEIVED 'AMY 16 1990 1'1 €WHONT E.STNTE.S 1 `IO.4 - � f08Pr1}>�lIOrV ` STORvwwNZEg 1:)RISINAGE. C■LCULrTroNS" A Pnvc: Z 4 5. 'FT. ? _..:f..A.1,'Dior. ,? z_ .15 /159 .FT. 1 ✓0 F . F` RF %5 = - 120 FT• -- -z STDRt■GE VDL.uihiE REQUIRED .t. 15 611 I2I14 1" SwF�e voLUYAG 1 . P_\ t39•l-r - co t5 -k:5,0 - 51 = (055". c- — "((o'DRwes - e - IG FT) --- z- 55951 -- - 23� Foie C=E.K• 9'.+94.43 - co 13i-39.1*S v 4 K. it it (2o F.-c) 3l!k2 F'(. /55 (A RLP JE f E. R. 3-144.43 -co V ... _. 3 -_ —. .. . .. 3 1 1913 itF (A 4t66•l2 t 111. IT. 0O. 349 Z 1 � .1 _- 5WA1_E_ -_.. . 5 . t . -F 112 ._'rT >.._)E.__I.�1i - f- 1- .-. -.z_ -I3 513 . FT.. STog.AGE NEEDED ▪ 1,-78 S1ORF6E _Ra Qu1RED - 631 f ?3 1 — T'I?E A,PlaYWSLt_ + 461 TT• LE (0,3 CPS ouT) ' A z l5 13C1 ET.2 z 3 . 2 - r FT. L 16 6'3 - • t e3 F 7 ✓31 -7 461 °)-» 2 63 q.4 5_TDRAGE 140-1 5/1190 KWw //A Tor..0F LBIVEWAY..�2�.— NOR. 0.116-7 T .$17 /07 F WALE SLppE .. SWPLE Si otTO•Vi ' I l o = 4 2 9 Io 6` e- rX - w /— ts 004 0 ./ 16, F /F T, -_._ -- ...._:Tor OF DK\VEWAY 2s_ 0.0161 FT FT.,_ � ESTATES- RO.4 /3!R PvvlTlotA 1yo. C9l90 (KWr.i .15 gASEYVIENT 15=- EASE■meNT R/W s /(1/ lV /�' NO∎ernF1- .WI" CON C. C u fc CROSS SECTIONAL AREA of SWALE : (1 ;t . 'E*D-1)4( / 1 9. 52 - 6 2t) 1.01 (2.91 KbW rid 1 - .. -- 45 O.Otb - 1 FT / e.x._n/g .fiuMAW 0 • CO NC. Pot +.D_EP_1IQ.!1_._... _.._... _ euf{E .. CRo55- 5EC.T ION hL AREA of Svc/fro-E- : _054 — %.� it 05 it -2‘±)-} * D" i � «1!) 4 2 _ — — .--._ .._ �L_� —' 4 .2&_D 5 2S 2 _f_'t. - _ •.5 z.o DA - Vr.- 5/7/90 TUTAL AREA = OVERLAND FLOW Ct = . L. = S = .01 CHANNEL FLqw VALUES SOU ZI = 66 Z2= 172 N = 8 = 0 TD 1794 DE'SCRIPTION = STORMWATER DRAINAGE .55 ACRES OOMPUTED VriLUES DUR = 3„7) 110 24 010 / - . 71 / RATIONAL FORMULA HYDROLOGY PROJECT NAME — RIDGEMONT ESTATES N0.4 2ND ADDITION DESIGNER = K W NEMULKIN BASIN F C 1ST ADD,) ACRES SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT SL,il,...:c•;REIA 2 = 17 ACRES SUBAREA 2 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = • COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = ..,,S81018181.82 DATE PROJECT NAME = RIDGE|`|ONT ESTATES NO"4 2ND ADDITION DESCRIPTION = STORMWATER DRAINAGE � BOWSTRING CALCULATIONS DESIGNER = K W HCMULKIH BASIN F (+ 0 t Intensity Qdev. Vin Vout Storage (sec.) (in./hr.) (c.f.s.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) 300 3.18 1.17 470 90 - zoo . 522 2.43 624 157 467 600 2 .24 .62 640 180 460 15`0 900 701 11.1 1200 1.45 .53 360 371 25.0 1500 1.21 ,44 746 450 296 30.0 1800 1.04 .38 ;,J6 540 216 2100 .91 762 630 132 40'0 2400 192 777 720 2700 ,74 .27 810 -27 50.0 3000 .68 794 900 -10h • 3100 .64 .24 818 990 -172 61_ .61 � 22 847 1080 -233 3900 .63 ^.i2 872 1170 -272 4200 .58 .21 1260 75`0 4500 .56 954 , 1350 80.0 4800 ^53 .19 970 1440 5100 .52 .19 999 , 1530 90,0 5400 "50 .18 1025 1620 � 95.0 5700 .49 .18 1058 1710 -652 100'0 6000 '.48 .18 1090 1800 . -710 . THE MAXIMUM STORAGE IS 167.417140828 CU. FT, 1. The time of concentration is 2.704783 ainutes. The Undeveloped flow otii is .3 c.f.s. R \DGErnONT EST - r ES ND. or 2N ADA1TLDN 5 "CORVYIWACE} pRAINAGE_.CALCU.LAT DNS-.. BASIN ‘‘ p ` PhvT. 1.65 r-r. ° / N. STORAGE VOLUvWE FREQUIRED = { 125 FT 2 "GOB S�JALE. .VO L LmIE..: . s 13+39•'14 -to tetso z 21 . ..... (ItiGH 0 FT. 't 1.9 FT.Z 75,51 1 STDRh�ac N EEDED _.._ _ 2500 fi IN z z _ 4J75. .F r. " "-LOS" STOC�AGE' REQUIRED z t F7. 5" CDRAGE MAILA6t -E 3S 1 F7 - 72_17/2 2 DR NES to Ft) l 12290 5/ Ho 0:10 he.tz-a f/ F 3 B FT. RATIONAL FORMULA HYDROLOGY DATE = 5/1/90 DESIGNER = K W MCMULKIN BASIN F PROJECT NAME RIDGEMOlyT ESTATES NO .4 2ND ADDITION DESCRIPTION = STORMWATER DRAINAGE SUBAREA 1 = ,1 ACRES • SL$AREA 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = TOTAL AREA = 'al ACRES • COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = 9 OVE.a_AND FLOW VALUES Ct = .15 L = 0 N =.4 8, = .01 CNANNEL FLOW VALUES L = : 21 = 16 22 = .172 N = .016. = 0 S = ,003 TD = .4142 COMPUTED VALUES DUR = 5,00 1.10 = 1.1B Q10 = .29 QA = • ‘1 = �.4-Z- fl- VEPTII OF 'PLOY/ 0.. t tn. pef AT inlLerr Q Q = 0.013 •Ft6, 1/4 (ck ?6 6- , 0.29 3M'l ft — Q Q, 0.0'13 1 1 1 1 I ' 11 1 ; I ' • 1 I 1 1 1 1 1' 1 I. 11 1 1 1 I I 1 11 11 /, 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 111 : 1 I I I 1. .1 1 �I 1 1 I � 1 161 T I I I- � --- ---T T I I L I 1 1 t . 1 X 111 f% _ MI A LL14__ I I I I �-I _ _ -�- I i 1 1 1 1 I 1 _ i i I 1 �� 1 -_ ___t. 1 _I-1-- 11-- 'I-1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 - I � �: 1 . ( . / ' I r± I t ,.i., i.a.I.I� i i IS .i .� I � I j Ii 1 L t i 1 I I I I I l I I I ' I l o c i • • I 1-1 1 1- 1 11 ilir a I X74111 ■■■! as■■ II I INA � , J !'ii. A I 1 I l I l +�� 1 ami n �� ,,,r at/ I 1 ' I I l li I I S AW 1 1 - - r � o � .e ttri SSN n . L__ isr/M%i au 1 - ■ • - T - � _ I I �� r I 11- I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I - / • ! , I II I ^�_� I . i. ' i I' 1 1 Or I 1 .I,L 11 1 I I • r / �1 I I I. it I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I' I IIII I I I I I I 1 11 1 I _ ? I I IC I I / / X /I 1 1 1 I I H 1 I I 1 I , I III I I:I I:.. I III 1 1 1 1 i'• 11 I' 11 I I I I' 11 1 1 I. I I I I.I II I I I I 1 l l ■a N ■ a/!•/■aa�s•i in BM:SII■ ■■ N2/56M1 1 Ham■i 0/ MI A sOM L i i1r1i� p aiMMIIit�i�r ■■ - : :: /r�A C/auini _I a T I — t - + - 1 � rai I ilir II I INA J !'ii. - - + - - --� {s .01' (a) DISCHARGE PER FOOT OF LENGTH OF CURB OPENING INLETS WHEN INTERCEPTING 100% OF GUTTER FLOW -.M. PARTIAL. INTERCEPTION RATIO FOR INLETS OF .. :. LENGTH LESS THAN L DEPTH OF FLOW - y - FEET .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .06 .10. ' .05 .06 .06 .10 .2 .5 .6 6 .7 4x•S7'.Y. .8 L / CAPACITY OF CURB OPENING INLETS ON CONTINUOUS GRADE 6 -39 FIGURE 16 • 1.0 .8 .6 5 .3 .2 , Oa L .10 .0e .06 03 04 .03 02 .01 1.0 6 .3 .3 Q .2 .10 1.0 • 4e ,c agive .,... STA - *D5 To 4 t 56.17- R•41-11 _ _____ ___. - _ "MENU C ST A • ii +13 To k3 + 7 ) LE I ‘51,12. . I. 1?) f'T r-- 2 -M 2 -0 et so *so - ' ' SC, ft 1 ' i ..•-• -"IT -irc 'la -I-t 314.14 I touritY. Englearing ; kvsgvyt o,Nrr ESTATES 4 . i 0 Sl DRIviv■I ATE t 2 - AR/1/41 NAGE CAL-CULALONS m _ IA 11 • 0• 114 I 295_ S2170F..f.\.E _V_Oc_YME, LfZeD-z- -11. ert, a ..... 4 ky r.r. iL 2500 ft , . 4000 FT. t 10D0 f PN. .c=ooe S / ::- ) " . :2 L Vi- = l 500 F 2. 09AVES ' • ' ' . . LOT • . . _ L A_ sigmmv,z ' 1 1 L O lgrF . . ' 1500 Ft - .L . - 12 S l4- 7 0,2.9_,,c .... —___.---___ _ __ _____ .__._ _ RECEIVED MAY 16 1990_, . • lk•OtA- - ) . • . 17-251 2.12.2h D (Y-WVI:N) F-4P,IL..FcaL.? • gwiopT ES Tp. s 41-"T_H_ p,i)DrriDN NO. k - 2_7-9 0 242.2./90 (he-wyA) ' STop-vvIWNTER Drziai e_AL.CuLF.T/DNE” Sv‘if-,LE VOL\Ayle t3-t34. a 9-4S —(4R■vcset‘f 2. 321 €-3/4 o-co tr io 4 E 2; + IT 44(2.o Fr) 'g 9 ft - co 9-9- 54.12. k @ 0.50 „, - swporE__ (38 i -1--_ 3 L-t-_ = LO2._f • - t•IPc t>12-1we -3/4- -- -505 — p-r: 1 -scnisLE--s - rogivie CD 2 OU O 1032- f- 46°1 7 30S NO _ \dal P‘pstryte_t_ - 2._3 - Ave— avtcL.A■V‘ create ‘y\d■v■dv.o.1 swo.les o-C s too ft , s avva 6 IN. deep be Jane_ (\.r■ P.AA - Thert•Cor‘e. each swede will be considered clak. StOrmv4 Prue vaatrill --ovedy -v1e-x-i at e- Thg locakiovt_ _QS dor\ ves,nictr o ecm6 (0 i d jcvlowv bt,1/49 disi 19e. caek ar■vewa3 shall be 0,12ev 100 rt. ov te f2-\p6CWO 'C es-TAT 41N NvortlON N \2 ? 4n/ o (Kww) , CROSS- SECTIONAL AREA of SWALE : / I l 2 '` 420 + ps 364 = 1.91 FT 42� J cons a Curb Cu - deep, e rniapoInt ra45ws ' r• VENuE• et—tree1;3LET:-.:- -17 S". 1 3.- apse — • t•ActoA Frays/. Grata \ 1 Si , 23 Top 1 '1] 95.07 Si Sarre% V SponAne County i Met.:51 Frame- * I STA. 13 + 93, 23t2 I Top Grate. l Ete.4.3 te5 1 0 5 . I C-13 4 Drckinaya Easement yutel1 ;Type A Standaret ate. ;Tyk2e 3 P'•we• , 25? st - 3 8 8 I 2 115.00 1 tn 3 4 BLOCK 4 533. 3 35. 4 ‘0 k .9 11 - w-IN Ino-cSe o •• • : Single Barrel Orytell ;Type. A • Spot County St data ;type.? • , 25' F zo •••• .•t RATIONAL FORMULA HYDROLOGY DATE — 2/22/90 DESIGNER = K W NOMULKIN BASIN PROJECT NAME = RIDGENONT ESTATES 4TH ADDITION DESCRIPTION = STORMWATER DRAINAGE SUBAREA 1 = .29 ACRES SUBAREA 2 = .17 ACRES -TOTAL AREA 4S ACRES.- COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .622326088957 OVERLAND FLOW VALUES OFLANWEL FLOW VALUES 0. 0.. Go. Ct = .15 = u • N = .4 L = 528 Zi = L2= .172 N = P = 0 S = .007 .173 CONFUTED VALUES DUR = 1.10 010 00 1:"E.FT4 of- FLoW IN FEET Pcegessioa AT INc.er 0.\ 'b per SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT SUBAREA 2 RUNOFF COEFFIC.1ENT = .15 FT. CAA.$3 OPeNktIG , CoriTtrAV‘ONS cy .9 ;.. .' / OMTE = 2/22/70 PROJECT NAME = RIDGEMONT ESTATES 4TH ADDITION DESCRIPTION = STORMWATER DRAINAGE DESIGNER = K W MCMULKlN BASIN C Intensity Qdev. Vin Vout Storage (1 (c.f.s.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft..? 3.18 ,91 366 90 276 393 7.8 .81 426 118 ' 308 - LC.0 600 2.24 ^64 471 180 291 13.0 .5r 524 254 1.45 .42 554 360 194 25.0 1.21 566 450 116 1800 1.04 ^30 570 540 72:6 210() .91 .26 582 630 -48 40"0 2400 .62 595 720 45.0 .21 601 810 -207 $00" .68 ^19, 611 ' 900 -289 . 64 .18 990 -360 , 61 .17 653 1080 3900 .60 ^17' 688 1170 -482 4200 ".JG .17 7 1240 -540 75ji 4500 .56 .16 737 1350 -813 80.0 4300 .53 .15 749 1440 -691 65.0 5100 "�2 .15 772 1530 -753 340U .50 .14 79: 1620 -827 . 49 , .14 819 1710 100.0 6000 .48 "14 844 1800 -956 THE MAXIMUM STORAGE IS(.307.6913O8;7'6 CU. Fr) � The time of concentration is 6.554931 minutes.' The Undeveloped Flow out zs .3 c.f.s. '~ `___` _____--~ - TEN YEAR STORM SALC 1 1 1 l i l l 1 1 1( ! , • ..a I 1 1 1 .O .7 . G .9 I 11 . L 1 I l I �...I I 1 j 1 1 111 l 1 j 1 1• , '1 1 j I I - 1 1 1 j 11 l I I I I / � f i -- a/ G�N� j-1-I - - i-- -I I A_ I ( J , ' 1 I . I I r i1 I I I l -- - 1 1 -1 - 1 1 1 111 i -I- F- • 1 ,A0 _L. 1 1 l 1. - 1 1 I' I .I IIII,1 .4 / I _I 1 IU .o. .X` I — - rr itr - --k.' 1 1 1 I i 1 j 1 �I' 1 1 i 1 / I 1 ' 1 1 1 1 11 ; � li . xx i I 1 t 1 1 1 _- 1 T 1 I I - M - 97 1-1--H-- I 1 1 1 1 I y�" cc , ,� c. 1 I t Yti MI ii 0 ' -I 1-- --1-, _ ' 1 -.1 _ . 1 1 .._ .I. I. 0 Y V/ �r�>�■N/r■ 4 °, 1 /��i�� 1 t I I �, I I I I t I I� t/I I I 1 111 I .�rw��a — A!• ∎riz a -- _ J % %� /I %' 1. — i ce _ _a a i l I I 1 ' .�I i - T i11 I t; '#I I I1 IIt iI ::1 l 1 1 I / I I Il 1 ► � �I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 f I it l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �( / 1: t I .I .I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I II 1 1 1 1 // I !I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11.. 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 — F - 4L-I-- ; 1.. 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I j I , I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1, 11 11811•11M11 ■■��■■ a— 11 / 1 �� Ittttllr•N:%!S!I■ N n a/ G�N� /A a A_ - . = El J_ i i i -. �i ! - -± -- 1 - — r -- IIII,1 .4 10 1 103 J I _I 1 IU .o. .X` I 1 1 1 i 1 DEPTH OF FLOW - y .01 .02 .03 .0. .0a 0e 0e a • 1.0 (a) DISCHARGE PER FOOT OF LENGTH OF CURB OPENING INLETS WHEN INTERCEPTING 100% OF GUTTER FLOW (b) PARTIAL INTERCEPTION RATIO FOR INLETS OF LENGTH LESS THAN L ' ..03 .06 .08 .10 L /L CAPACITY OF CURB OPENING INLETS ON CONTINUOUS GRADE 6 -39 FIGURE 16 8 1.0 s .10 .5 .5 4 .3 1.0 s 2 Q a L 10 0s 06 03 03 2 • .8 .s . Q 3 Oa „ �`IU'1ui� SPO COUNTY COURTHOUSE rev: 12/89 IQ Spokane County Engineer Spokane County Utilities Spokane County Health District Spokane County Department of Building & Safety Fire Protection District #1 Vera Water and Power MEMORANDUM Please direct your review comments to Paul Jensen. Thank You. kc Enclosure PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 hi a c 1990 *AA* iaeerit FROM: homas G. Mosher, AICP, Senior Planner DATE: May 7, 1990 SUBJECT: Review of Final PE- 1423 -82 & ZE -32 -82 Ridgemont Estates #4, 2nd Addition Enclosed find copies of the above referenced final plat. Please review and forward any comments by May 21, 1990. If you have any questions you may contact Paul Jensen at 456 -2205. c: Sullivan South Enterprises, Ken Tupper, E. 12929 Sprague Ave., Spokane, WA. 99216 Richard Mason, S. 25 Altamont, Spokane, WA. 99202 RECEIVED MAY 8 1990 ,CounlY Eigineering CL _NCE E. SIMPSON ENGINEERS C. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYOR N. 909 Argonne Road Spokane, Washington 99212 Telephone: 926 -1322 Fax: 926 -1323 TO: rnuAiry - Al(-1(A/e7e p SUBJECT: k3 <,EM OAl"! — /Vd 7n.q Ai'it i TIo A I C DATE: ll /23/90 A 7774-6 FlC TTh /S Al / rS P ("VC pc AT -.De 2evh w 'vim APR 2 4 19su Cumdy b n8anpg STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY AGREEMENT • VCL.;C5U PAGE 1276 THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between Alfons B. Renz and Hilda E. Renz, husband and wife, residing at South 2009 Sullivan Road, Veradale, Washington 99037, - hereinafter referred to as the "Grantors" and Spokane County, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, having its principal place of business. at. West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, Washington, 99201, hereinafter referred to as the "Grantee" Jointly, along with the Grantors, hereinafter . referred to as the "Parties ". The parties hereto do mutually, agree as follows:. 1. The grantors, husband and wife, in consideration of $1.00, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and other valuable consideration, do hereby convey and release to the e . grantee easements and rights -of -way for storm drainage systems hereinafter more particularly designated and described, over and across lands owned by the grantors and situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, and more•'particulat described as follows: (PARCEL A). Beginning at the SW corner of L -11 in B -1 in Renz' Subdivision in Section 25, T. 25, N., R44 E.W.M., thence S 19 ° 13'09" W. along west line of said sub- division a distance of 9.86 feet; thence N 69 ° 35' W. a distance of 176.89 feet; thence S 30 ° 06' W. a distance of 100 feet; thence N 59 ° 54' W. a distance of 80 feet; thence N 30 ° 06' E. a distance of 120 feet; thence S 59 ° 54' E. a distance of 80 feet; thence S 69 ° 35' E. a distance of 173.11 feet to the West line of said subdivision, thence S 19 ° 13'09" W. a distance of 9.86 feet to the SW corner of L -11 in B -1, (PARCEL B) 8' Wide on Each Side of that center line description beginning at the West corner of L -3 in B -1 in Ridge - mont Estates in Section 25, T. 2 5 N R.44 E.W.M., thence • N 81 ° 53 W along existing draw, to the existing stock pond; .L?;.R. E. Exdse Tax exempt . Dace. � <•- — �c - _, , .; f / a :f:clncy T reassrir both parcels.hereinafter referred to as the "lands ". 2. The easements and rights -of -way hereby conveyed and released are for the sola.purpose of locating; establishing, constructing, operating, maintaining, repairing and all other matters incidental thereto over and across the above described lands storm drainage systems. 3. The grantors further grant to the grantee: A. The right to extend cuts and fills for grad- ' ing done in relationship.to the stoma drainage systems into and on the lands along the outside of the lands as described hereinabove to such an extent as the grantee may find reasonably Leo 1. zou PACE 1� ! necessary; and • B. The right to support the storm drainage systems across ravines and watercourses on the lands hereinabove des- cribed with such'structures as the grantee shall deem necessary; and C. The right from time to time to trim and cut... down and clear away any and all trees, bushes, and crops now or hereinafter on the lands hereinabove described and to trim and cut down and clear away any trees, brush Or crops on either side of the lands hereinabove described which now or hereinafter in the opinion of the grantee may be a hazard to the storm drainage systems or which may interfere with the exercise of the grantees.. rights heretnder; and D.: The right to excavate .earth., store equipment and materials, and. any other matters incidental or necessary to locate, establish, construct, operate, maintain, or repair the .storm drainage systems over and across the above described lands. . 4. The grantors hereby release the grantee from any and all claims, actions and damages of any kind or nature whatso- • ever including inverse condemnation by or to any and all persons -2- or property arising out of or in any way. incident. to or attri- butable to the establishment, Construction, operation, maintenance,. repair or any matters done in conjunction 'therewith- of the storm drainage systems over and across the above described lands. 5. The grantors agree to furnish to the grantee prior to the execution of this agreement", their abstract of title show ing - marketable title up to the date of this agreement. 6. The grants of easements and rights -of -way shall run with the lands and shall be binding on and -shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs, successors or 'assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed . this agreement on the .10 day of 1)S1/ , 1975. GRANTORS HLAND he Bo GRANTEE SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal cor- poration of the State of Washington Board of County Commissioners VERNON ].er B S�t1:4tfl '.., eputy Clerk STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE) On this day personally appeared before me Alfons B. Renz and Hilda E. Renz, husband and wife, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the Within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purpbses therein mentioned. V61: CU U PAGE 11, 10 i. • GIVEN under my hand and official of pc c f L ,.r 1975. FILED OR RECORDED QUEST OF 1 ". ge FR 15 VERNON 1Y.O141.0 O.AU0 M. SPOKANE EOUTTY:W.1SiL. , artXxX 4 0_7./4, BFF, IR. ca ?ACE 1i 7 5 2 RIGHT -OP -WAY AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT,. made and entered into by and between Alfons B. Benz 'and Hilda E. Hertz, husband and wife, residing at South 2009 Sullivan Road, Veradale, Washington 99037, herein- after referred to as the "Grantors" and Spokane County, a munici- pal corporation. of the State of Washington, having its principal place of business at West 1116 Broadway, Spokane,. Washington 99201,. hereinafter referred to as the. "Grantee "; jointly herein- after referred to along with the grantors as the "Parties ". W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS; the grantors are the owners of land more particularly described herein; and WHEREAS, the grantors and the grantee have agreed upon a right -of -way for road access across lands of the grantors; NOW, THEREFORE, be it mutually agreed by the parties hereto: 1. The grantors, husband and wife, in consideration of .$1.00, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and other valuable consideration, do hereby convey and release to the grantee a right -of -way for a road hereinafter more particularly designated and described, over and across lands owned by the grantors and situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washing - ton, more particularly described as 5 feet on either side of that center line described to -wit: Beginning at the SW corner of L -19, B -1 Ridgemont Estates in Section 25, T.25 N, R44 E.W.M., thence N. 89 ° 32'42" W. along the north R/W line of 24th Ave., a distance of 5.19 feet to the true point of beginn- ing; thence N. 16 ° 10'39" E. a distance of 342.16 feet; thence N. 71 ° 42'35" W. a distance of 2.4 feet; thence N. 2 ° 07' E. a distance of 133.0 feet; thence N. 11 °05' E. a distance of 375.0 feet; thence N. 17 °20' E. a distance of 262.0 feet; thence N. 28 °34'E. a distance of 115.0 feet; thence N. 34 °33 E. a distance of 405 feet to the existing stock pond; :% R. E. "ax E<art7t i /• p .. �` - / - ad; /v P Ccuny Trlazura: . • /l for hereunder. hereinafter. referred to as the lands. 2. The right -of -way hereby *.onveyed and released is the sole purpose of ingress.and.egress over properties owned by the grantors in order for the grantee to locate, estab- lish, construct,•operate, maintain,. repair, and all matters incidental thereto storm drainage systems. 3. The grantors further grant to the grantee the option from time to time to cut down and clear away, any and all trees, brush, crops, and /or debris now on or hereinafter on the lands which are the subject of this agreement and to trim and to. cut down and clear away any trees, brush, crops and /or debris on either side of the'landswhich are the subject of agreement which now or hereinafter in the opinion of the grantee may interfere with the exercise of the grantee's rights 4. The grantors hereby release the grantee from any and all claims, actions, and damages of any kind and nature whatsoever including inverse condemnation to any person or property arising out of or in any way incident to or attributable to.the County's use of the hereinabove described right -of -way for ingress and egress for the purpose of establishmentc'-con- struction; operation, maintenance, repair or_any.tatters done in conjunction therewith of storm drainage systems. 5. The grantors shall furnish to the grantee,an abstract of title showing marketable title up to the date' of this agreement. 6. This grant of right -of -way shall run with the land and shall be binding. on and shall inure to the .benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs, successors or assigns. —2— this agreement ATTEST: VERNON Clert ,l; J �v o IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the'parties.hereto have executed Deputy erk STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) on the I (,) day of 02< / , 197 5 . GRANTORS 'HLAND he Bo GRANTEE SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal corporation, Board of County. Commissioners On this day personally appeared before me Alfons B.. Renz and Hilda E. Benz, husband- and wife to me known to be H the individuals described in and who executed the within and_ foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their tree and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. . 1 this /v da�t:1s { • nd for t e-5. siding at S1tlka Te1 GIVEN under. my hand and official sea 779-•-e-e.y14ce- , 1975. Notary Public in of /Washington, r Fit- --E9 AFB h= @H,AiHP. 1 flu §7 &c 4' Z 11 ?W L:tu vc S.ttt St'ilttrtiE coos (;t K :i: - G:=7tl1 Y:' YC(. 250 PAGE a. r. Cam- xx y 250 PACE12891 INDEMNNITY AGREEMENT FJL 9.R a coADF.p R!QtJZST Cd =v 12 4'4.rH • afp Yc .0NLAND.'SWIM .°.rOn4VE COUflTY.w. 3k,„ D: ?Di' THIS INDEMNITY AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between Alphons B. Renz and Hilda E. Renz, husband and wife, residing at South 2009 Sullivan Road; •Veradale; 99037, j hereinafter referred to as the "Indemnitdrs" and Spokane County, apolitical subdivision of -the State of Washington, having offices for the,transaction.of.business at West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, Washington 99201, hereinafter referred to as the "Indemnitee ", jointly hereinafter referred to along with the .Indemnitors as the "Parties ". W I T N E S S E T H:. • WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County has the care of County property and the management.of :' County funds; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of. Spokane County pursuant to the Revised Code of.Washington, Chapter 58.17. (Plats -- Subdivisions -- Dedications) in.approving plats may require.: conditions therein for the health, safety, and welfare of the public; and • WHEREAS, applicable departments within Spokane County have approved .a drainage control system in conjunction with Renz subdivision; to be recorded as Ridgemont Estates, and designated as PE 968 by appropriate County departments; and WHEREAS, for the correct operation of said drainage control system various easements on properties owned by the - R. E. Ezci;e Tax E. ^art Ccuny Trnasur,; Indemnitors hereinabove were obtained; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with easements granted by the indemnitors hereinabove, the parties hereto desire to execute an agreement releasing the indemnitee from any and all losses follows: to the property, both real and personal, owned by the Indemnitors which may_be_damaged or injured in anyway as a result of the Indemnitee maintaining any.drainage'control systems on the Rer-z. Subdivision, to be recorded as Ridgemont Estates, -or the Indemnitors'.property adjacent thereto; • NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of $1.00 and other good and valuable.consideration, receipt of which hereby acknowledged, it..is hereby agreed: SECTION 1 •-- LIABILITY, LOSS OR DAMAGE The -.'Indemnitors undertake -to- indemnify - and release the Indemnitee from any and ill . actions, demands, costs, expenses,. ' compensation, and all claims of every kind or nature whatsoever dke . to their person.or property- .(real and personal) including inverse condemnation /arising out of or incident to or attributable 'to the Indemnitee locating, establishing, construct -. ing, operating, maintaining, repairing, and all matters.incidental thereto,.the drainage control system in conjunction with Renz Subdivision a /k/a Ridgemont Estates. SECT/ON. 2 — DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY -r • The•real property, including all encumbrances attached and located thereon, which is owned by the..Indemnitors, whiCh is the aUbject , 'is described as: • The NW 1/4 of Section 25, T. 25N., R.44 E.W.M. EXCEPT any land lying Southeasterly of the Northwesterly line of Ridgemont Estates. SECTION 3 --- RUN WITH THE LAND This indemnity agreement shall run with the land herein above described, and shall be binding on and - shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs, successors, or assigns. -2- 7 This indemnity agreement contains entire agreement • between the parties hereto and the terms Are - contractual and not merely a recital. fully tents . --- acts. _ .- _ -.: • . , . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed on'the T\ day of , 514.P.U1 0 $ 'ref 4 ,1-■ '!" :' .4+ I • ' • lib s " :a le" 44, • p, -* ate!! • • .,• • • • • SECTION 4 ENTIRE AGREEMENT The undersigned IndemnitorA state that therhave ca:res read the foregoing indetnity agreeMent, and:know the con- thereof, and they have signed the *same as their own free .. ATTEST: VERNON Cler Deputy C STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss COUNTY OF sP0icAN8) On this day personally appeared before me Alfons B.Renz and Hilda E. Renz, husband and wife, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and fore- going instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal thiS • . y Onap. / -4 0;. Nota4y Public in and As. th tc Satle7 of dashington siding at . 7)c , 1975. • -3- • OFF. 25n PAPE INDENNITORS INDEMNITEE SPOKANE COUNTY,. a municipal corporation . HOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ss. ) — On this date, December 10, 1975, personally appeared before me Alfons B. Renz and Hilda E. Renz, husband and wife, to me know to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they initialed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official sell thi 0th da � y.�Decembcr, 1975. VOL. 2501 ?AGE 3283 Notary Public in and, f J or_ the"tate: of Washington, residing.fW.:$pgkanet._ . . Situate in the County of Spokane, State of wasnington. ine.: public Water system, ,pursuant the -.ATER PLAN approved by :- 5County State Health authorities, the local fire district, County, Building and Safety Department, and water purveyor, will - beinstalled within this plat, and the subdivider/SPOflSOr will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot. :No- ;.pore than one dwelling unit shall be placed on any one lot , 'shall • any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of *creating additional lots or building sites without first filing a - frteplat.', ft '.::Individual . driveway access permits will be required prior to :"issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the "County road system. owner(s) or successors) in interest agree to authorize the ''.;County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of :`ULID, by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition 'i?:`includes the owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by :-.resolution •method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which 'includes the owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any >.assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called :-.for'-in-..conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either ;„petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. Lot`3 •Block 1, Lot 2 -Block 2 and Lot 5 Block 3 as shown hereon are ' dedicated to Spokane; County to "be deeded for road purposes forever at,such time as' adjacent property is platted. Use of- private. wells and water systems is prohibited. The; plattor; does hereby dedicate forever the streets shown hereon 'for public;.road- purposes. ` ,.Utility easements as shown•are hereby granted. D rainage easements, as platted and shown hereon, which are for •.the; purpose of installing, -operating and maintaining . ``dr'ainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby -granted. The of Spokane is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all drainage easements adjacent to he Public. right -of -way. The property owner shall maintain the drainage swale with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage, swale as indicated by the approved plans'. . The property owner or.his representative shall inform each sucbeeding;:; purchaser of all drainage easements on the property and llis maintaining drainage facilities within saidleasements. Indiyiduai driveway access permits 'shall be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County -road .system. Driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance; with t approved plan on file in the County gineer`s.office. D irect :. access to 2'4 Avenue from lots is prohibited. Lot 2; Block 1; Lo 2, 4; Lot 1, Block 3 and Lot 6, Block 4 .r: require no - typical driveways, depending on driveway ":'location. Loc- ion shall be reviewed and approved by County Engineers.: A •ublic sewer system will be made available ,;piot:and individual service will be prov'Ided to each l ot ;.rior t;; r Use of individual on -si sewage dispcsal systems s`::1 not be auth.rized IN WiTNES 'WHEREOF, I have hereunto s,et cur hand ar: offixe:: -__, . day of ,1990. Sull ivan South Enterprises Kenneth J. Tupper,`Managi.Th0 Partner / W-eO :: RO SS I / i � +�. D J RS f,r FINAL PLAT ,D I .G r' - o�i � �f (� 1 h0 d rr,. i i sw� , C cMD�Q� RIDGE MONT ESTATES NO. - lsf ADDI°t A n A'r I of A onoTlnro nc Prepared For: TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY North 720 Argonne Spokane, Washington 99212 Tupper & Assoc. , E. 12929 Sprague Ave. Attn: Ken Tupper cc: Spokane County Planning De cc: Spokane County Engineering cc: Simpson Engineers Certificate for Filing Proposed: RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO. 4 2ND ADDN. pt. PLAT CERTIFICATE Effective Date: April 23, 1990 at 8:00 a.m. Order No.: VH- 150657M Charge: Tax: Total: $125.00 9.75 $134.75 In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for approval, this company has examined the records of the Spokane County Auditor's and Clerk's offices, and the office of the Clerk of the United States District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction. .Liability is limited to the amount paid for this certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to wit: That portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M. described as follows: BEGINNING at the Southeast corner of Lot 5, Block 4, RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO. 4 - 1ST ADDITION, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 19 of Plats, page 27; thence the next three courses and distances along the Westerly line of said Ridgemont Estates No. 4 - 1st Addition, North 00 °39'38" East a distance of 286.77 feet; thence North 20 °07'32" East a distance of 73.38 feet; thence North; 30 °47'51" West a distance of 125.00 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 4, Block 3 of said Ridgemont Estates No. 4 - 1st Addition; thence North 23 °28'54" East a distance of 80.73 feet; thence North 00 °39'38" East a distance of 212.37 feet; thence South 89 °20'22" East a distance of 218.00 feet; thence South 47 °21'08" East a distance of 67.27 feet; thence South 89 °20'22" East a distance of 500.60 feet to the West line of Ridgemont Estates, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 36; thence the next two courses and distances along said West line of Ridgemont Estates, South 19 °13'09" West a distance of 209.65 feet; thence South 16 °10'39" West a distance of 522:69 feet to the North tight of way line of 24th Avenue; thence North 89 °32'42" West along said right of way a distance of 552.57 feet to the point of beginning;' Situate in the County of Spokane,. State of Washington. (continued) VESTED IN: (continued) ALPHONS B. RENZ and HILDA RENZ, also known as HILDA E. RENZ, husband and • wife, to portion in Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; and ALPHONS B. RENZ and HILDA E. RENZ, husband and wife, and their assigns, as shown under Memorandum of Real Estate Contract recorded January 28, 1982 under Recording No. 8201280204 (shown at Paragraph 6 herein), as to that portion in the Southwest quarter of the Northwest Quarter. EXCEPTIONS: Order No.VH- 150657M Page No. 2 A. General taxes, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid Principal Balance 45252.9054 1990 $4463.57 $00.00 $4463.57 Affects this and other property 45252.9058 1990 $4640.36 $00.00 $4640.36 Affects this and other property B. Assessment for Road Improvement District No. 38, in the amount of S1505.61 plus interest at 8%. There is one delinquent installment • which was due on April 6, 1989, in the amount of $501.87 plus interest. C. Assessment for Road Improvement District No. 37, in the amount of $824.25 plus interest at 8 %. The next installment is due on April 13, 1991, in the amount of $824.25 plus interest. a. 3. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: AND: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: REGARDING: 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: Copy attached. 5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS. AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: Copy attached. SELLER: PURCHASER: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: AFFECTS: (continued) Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington Sullivan South Enterprises, a Washington general partnership, and Alfons B. Renz and Hilda E. Renz, husband and wife September 15, 1988 September 21, 1988 8809210088 Sewerage system Spokane County Sewer facilities A portion of said land September 15, 1988 September 21, 1988 8809210091 Spokane County Sewer facilities A portion of said land September 15, 1988 September 21, 1988 8809210092 Order No.VH- 150657M Page No. 4 6. MEMORANDUM OF CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Alfons B. Renz and Hilda E. Renz, husband and wife Sullivan South Enterprises, a Washington partnership January 27, 1982 January 28, 1982 8201280204 Portion lying in SW1 /4 of NW1 /4, with other property. Seller's interest in said Contract has been assigned as follows: Seller's interest of Alfons B. Renz and Hilda E. Renz, husband and wife, assigned to: Seller /Assignee Grantors: Alfons B. Renz and Hilda E. Renz, husband and wife Grantees: Bruce B. Butler, Trustee, Bruce B. Butler, P.S. Profit Sharing Trust James R. Wilharm and Mary Haney, Co- Trustee, Evergreen Wholesale Lumber, Inc., Profit Sharing Trust Brian Jenner, Trustee, Brian Jenner, Inc., Pension Trust 09.090% James F. O'Connell & Associates, Inc., a Washington corporation Fern B. Klaus, a single person Tony Higley, a married man dealing in his sole and separate property Order No.VH- 150657M Page No. 5 Undivided Interest 09.105% 11.360% 15.905% 09.090% 09.090% 09.090% Douglas Coins, Inc., a Washington corporation 09.090% Ronald P. Douglas and Dennis L. Douglas, Co- Trustees, Douglas Coins, Inc., Profit Sharing Trust 09.090% Terence R. Whitten and Marjorie P. Whitten, husband and wife 04.545% Kenneth J. Tupper, Trustee, Tupper, Inc. Profit Sharing Trust 04.545% By instrument recorded June 3, 1986 under Recording No. 8606030268. b. A portion of Seller's interest was assigned by Ronald P. Douglas and Dennis L. Douglas, Trustees of the Douglas Coins, Inc. Profit Sharing Trust to Richard W. McEachran and Bruce A. McEachran, Co- Trustees of the Robert w. McEachran Life Insurance Trust, dated May 10, 1982 by instrument recorded April 12, 1988 under Recording No. 8804120237. c. A portion of Seller's interest was assigned by Douglas Coins, Inc., to Dennis L. Douglas and Ronald P. Douglas, Trustees of the Dennis L., Douglas, P.S. Profit Sharing Trust by instrument recorded April 26, -1988 under Recording No. 8804260191. (continued) 9. Order No.VH- 150657M Page No. r 6 A portion of Seller's interest was assigned to Douglas Coins, Inc., to Dennis L. Douglas and Ronald P. Douglas, Trustees of the Dennis L. Douglas, P.S. Profit Sharing Trust by instrument recorded May 5,•1988 under Recording No. 8805050165. e. A portion of Seller's interest was assigned by James F. O'Connell & Associates, Inc., a Washington corporation, to Douglas Enterprises, Inc., a Washington corporation, by instrument recorded May 6, 1988 under Recording No. 8805060180. A portion of Seller's interest was assigned by Douglas Enterprises, Inc., formerly Douglas Coins, Inc. to Delores L. Douglas by instrument recorded June 17, 1988 under Recording No. 8806170313. A portion of Seller's interest was assigned by Douglas Enterprises, Inc., formerly Douglas Coins, Inc., to Jack R. Felgenhauer and Gloria E. Felgenhauer, by instrument recorded June 17, 1988 under Recording No 8806170315. h. A portion of Seller's interest was assigned by Ronald P. Douglas and Dennis L. Douglas, Trustees of the Douglas Coins, Inc. Profit Sharing Trust to Richard W. McEachran.and Bruce A. McEachran, Co- Trustees of the Robert W. McEachran Life Insurance Trust, dated May 6, 1982 by instrument recorded September 9, 1988 under Recording No. 8809090164. i. A portion of Seller's interest was assigned by Douglas Enterprises, Inc., a Washington corporation, to Fern B. Klaus, a single woman, bv instrument recorded June 14, 1989 under Recording No. 8906140120. 7. MORTGAGE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: - MORTGAGOR: A.B. Renz and Hilda E. Renz, husb_r,d and wife, also shown of record .s: Alphons B. Renz and Hilda Renz, and Alfons b. Renz MORTGAGEE: Claude A. Morgan and Louella R. Morgan, husband and wife ORIGINAL AMOUNT: 5159,665.00 DATED: May 30, 1986 RECORDED: June 3, 1986 RECORDING NO.: 8606030271 AFFECTS: SE1 /4 NW1 /4 and other property TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY by V (J L . . // ' Viekie Hager, Tittle Officer For Service on this Order, Ca (509) 922 -2222 (continued) FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO PE 1423A Northerly street centerline 5/11/90 AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 1346.02080 1651.81174 53 RADIAL S 35 02 26.0 E DELTA 42 45 44.0 LT RADIUS 410.0000 _ TAN 160.5213 L —ARC 306.0000 RADIAL S 77 48 10.0 E RP 1681.70660 1416.40773 49 53 CHORD N 33 34 42.0 E 298.9473 1595.08286 1817.15245 58 TAN @PT N 12 11 50.0 E 58 INV S 77 48 10.0 E 270.0000 1538.03796 2081.05751 59 LAT & DEP — 0.00349 0.01236 59 HCLOSE S 74 13 46.2 E 0.0128 1538.03447 2081.06987 38 PREC = 1 TO 44840 No Area FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO PE 11238 centerline 23rd -4e 5/11/90 AUTO INVERSE * ** ** START 1282.10280 1588.28298 2 2 INV N 20 07 32.0 E 35.4000 1315.34130 1600.46336 48 RADIAL S 26 40 27.0 E DELTA 62 39 55.0 LT RADIUS 410.0000 TAN 249.6039 L -ARC 448.4233 RADIAL S 89 20 22.0 E RP 1681.70660 1416.40773 49 48 CHORD N 31 59 35.5 E 426.4047 1676.97986 1826.38049 50 TAN @PT N 0 39 38.0 E 50 INV N 0 39 38.0 E 42.5000 1719.47704 1826.87045 51 51 INV N 47 21 08.0 W 33.6300 1742.26101 1802.13450 52 LAT & DEP 0.00125 - 0.00255 52 HCLOSE N 63 52 30.2 W 0.0028 1742.26226 1802.13195 7 PREC = 1 TO 197391 No Area FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO southerly street centerline AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 1315.34130 1600.46336 48 RADIAL S 26 40 27.0 E DELTA 8 21 59.0 LT RADIUS 410.0000 TAN 29.9876 L -ARC 59.8686 RADIAL S 35 02 26.0 E RP 1681.70660 1416.40773 49 48 CHORD N 59 08 33.5 E 59.8154 1346.02080 1651.81174 53 TAN @PT N 54 57 34.0 E 53 INV S 35 02 26.0 E 25.0000 1325.55215 1666.16564 54 RADIAL S 54 57 34.0 W DELTA 43 30 00.0 LT RADIUS 410.00 1Ni TAN 163.5734 L -ARC 311.2795 RADIAL S 11 27 34.0 W RP 1560.95616 2001.85144 55 54 CHORD S 56 47 26.0 E 303.8571 1159.12927 1920.39499 56 TAN@PT S 78 32 26.0 E 56 INV N 11 27 34.0 E 25.0000 1183.63091 1925.36185 57 LAT & DEP - 0.00432 0.00840 57 HCLOSE S 62 46 36.2 E 0.0095 1183.62659 1925.37025 23 PREC = 1 TO 44559 No Area 28 30 32 34 35 37 39 41 42 44 46 DELTR RADIUS TAN L -ARC RADIAL RP CHORD TRN @PT RADIAL DELTR RADIUS TAN L -ARC RADIAL RP CHORD TRNr @PT RADIAL DELTA RADIUS TAN L -ARC RADIAL RP CHORD TRN @PT INV RADIAL DELTA RADIUS TAN L -ARC RADIAL RP CHORD TRN @PT RADIAL DELTR RADIUS TAN L -ARC RADIAL RP CHORD TRN @PT RADIAL DELTR RADIUS TAN L -ARC RADIAL RP CHORD TRN @PT INV RADIAL DELTR RADIUS TAN L -ARC RADIAL RP CHORD TAN @PT RADIAL DELTA RADIUS TAN L -RRC RADIAL RP CHORD TAN @PT INV 87 03 12.0 RT 20.0000 18. 9970 30.3873 N 40 46 15.0 W N N S S N N N N N S S N N S 51 47 34.0 E S 25 46 58.0 E S 64 13 02.0 W 284 02 24.0 LT 50.0000 39. 0362 247.8717 N 39 49 22.0 W N S S S S N N S N 5 42 09.0 E 49 13 45.0 E 40 46 15.0 E 31 21 22.0 LT 435.0000 122. 0932 238.0613 72 07 37.0 E 33 33 04.0 E 17 52 23.0 E 72 07 37.0 W 84 19 27.0 RT 20.0000 18. 1108 29.4347 12 11 50.0 E 60 02 06.5 E 77 48 10.0 E 77 48 10.0 E 12 11 50.0 E 52 01 12.0 RT 15. 0000 7.3192 13. 6188 64 13 02.0 E 12 11 50.0 E 50 10 38.0 W 39 49 22.0 E 52 01 12.0 RT 15.0000 7.3192 13.6188 12 11 50.0 W 76 11 14.0 W 77 48 10.0 W 77 48 10.0 W 12 11 50.0 W 84 19 27.0 RT 20.0000 18. 1108 29.4347 83 28 43.0 W N 35 38 26.5 W N 6 31 17.0 E S 83 28 43.0 E 5 51 39.0 LT 435.0000 22. 2677 44.4965 S 89 20 22.0 E N 3 35 27.5 E N 0 39 38.0 E N 0 39 38.0 E 27. 5477 235.1016 26.8492 176.0000 13. 1558 61.5386 13.1558 176.0000 26. 8492 44.4771 20.0000 1337.11931 1352.26586 1681. 70336 1548.19791 1542.05973 1561.60825 1524. 42343 1509.76204 1516.28644 1587.95635 1573.29496 1610. 47978 1630. 02831 1632.29979 1681. 70453 1676.68958 1696.68825 1713.54709 1700.48639 1416.41609 31 1830.42248 32 1849.45726 1853.68281 2025.70981 2022.54065 2036.04739 1538.03447 2081.06987 1576.43592 2049.04912 2039.44289 2036.27373 1864.24673 1868.47228 1848.60169 1416.41634 1851.38743 1851.61801 LAT & DEP - 0.00071 - 0.00679 47 HCLOSE S 84 01 54.9 W 0.0068 1696.68754 1851.61122 PREC = 1 TO 575437 Area = 339612.12 sq ft 7.79642 ac 29 30 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 FROM ANGLE. DIST NORTH EAST TO PE 1423A Block 2 Sideline - 5/11/90 AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 1696.68754 1851.61122 8 8 INV S 89 20 22.0 E 500.6000 1690.91632 2352.17795 9 9 INV S 19 13 09.0 W 209.6500 1492.95089 2283.16483 10 10 INV S 16 10 39.0 W 522.6900 990.95775 2137.53609 11 11 INV N 89 32 42.0 W 552.5700 995.34580 1584.98351 12 12 INV N 0 39 38.0 E 286.7700 1282.09674 1588.28957 16 RADIAL S 23 16 23.0 E DELTA 6 08 09.0 LT RADIUS 435.0000 TAN 23.3145 L -ARC 46.5844 RADIAL S 29 24 32.0 E RP 1681.70179 1416.41518 17 16 CHORD N 63 39 32.5 E 46.5621 1302.75692 1630.01711 18 TRN @PT N 60 35 28.0 E RADIAL N 29 24 32.0 W DELTA 82 07 33.0 RT RADIUS 20.0000 TAN 17.4243 L -ARC 28.6673 RADIAL N 52 43 01.0 E RP 1285.33416 1639.83788 19 18 CHORD S 78 20 45.5 E 26.2755 1297.44923 1655.75094 20. TRN @PT S 37 16 59.0 E RADIAL S 52 43 01.0 W DELTA 41 15 27.0 LT RADIUS 435.0000 TAN 163.7549 L -ARC 313.2345 RADIAL S 11 27 34.0 W RP 1560.95184 2001.85984 21 20 CHORD S 57 54 42.5 E 306.5108 1134.62331 1915.43654 22 TRN @PT S 78 32 26.0 E RADIAL S 11 27 34.0 W DELTA 248 20 01.0 LT RADIUS 50.0000 TAN 73.6645 L -ARC 216.7120 RADIAL N 56 52 27.0 W RP 1183.62659 1925.37025 23 22 CHORD N 22 42 26.5 W 82.7406 1210.95057 1883.49663 24 TAN @PT S 33 07 33.0 W RADIAL S 56 52 27.0 E DELTA 78 36 01.0 RT RADIUS 20.0000 TAN 16.3699 L -ARC 27.4367 RADIAL S 21 43 34.0 W RP 1221.88016 1866.74718 25 24 CHORD S 72 25 33.5 W 25.3353 1203.30088 1859.34378 26 TRN @PT N 68 16 26.0 W RADIAL S 21 43 34.0 W DELTA 30 26 59.0 RT RADIUS 385.0000 TRN 104.7816 L -ARC 204.6074 RADIAL S 52 10 33.0 W RP 1560.95201 2001.85929 27 26 CHORD N 53 02 56.5 W 202.2081 1324.85450 1697.74916 28 TAN @PT N 37 49 27.0 W RADIAL S 52 10 33.0 W I FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH ' EAST TO PE 1423A Ridgemont Estate NO 4 - 2nd Add 5/11/90 AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 995.35185 1584.97692 1 1 INV N 0 39 38.0 E 286.7700 1282.10280 1588.28298 2 2 INV N 20 07 32.0 E 73.3800 1351.00228 1613.53146 3 3 INV N 30 47 51.0 W 125.0000 1458.37506 1549.53079 4 4 INV N 23 28 54.0 E 80.7300 1532.41961 1581.69811 5 5 INV N 0 39 38.0 E 212.3700 1744.77550 1584.14644 6 6 INV S 89 20 22.0 E 218.0000 1742.26226 1802.13195 7 7 INV S 47 21 08.0 E 67.2700 1696.68754 1851.61122 8 8 INV S 89 20 22.0 E 500.6000 1690.91632 2352.17795 9 9 INV S 19 13 09.0 W 209.6500 1492.95089 2283.16483 10 10 INV S 16 10 39.0 W 522.6900 990.95775 2137.53609 11 11 INV N 89 32 42.0 W 552.5700 995.34580 1584.98351 12 LAT & DEP 0.00605 - 0.00659 12 HCLOSE N 47 27 14.7 W 0.0090 995.35185 1584.97692 1 PREC = 1 TO 318293 Area = 472716.81 sq ft 10.85208 ac ERROR:Invalid Command: block 1 sideline. FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO Block 1 Sideline AUTO INVERSE * * * ** START 1351.00228 1613.53146 3 INV N 30 47 51.0 W 125.0000 1458.37506 1549.53079 4 INV N 23 28 54.0 E 80.7300 1532.41961 1581.69811 5 INV N 0 39 38.0 E 212.3700 1744.77550 1584.14644 6 INV S 89 20 22.0 E 218.0000 1742.26226 1802.13195 7 INV S 0 39 38.0 W 65.0000 1677.26658 1801.38259 13 RADIAL S 89 20 22.0 E DELTA 58 32 31.0 RT RADIUS 385.0000 TAN 215. 7955 L -ARC 393.3736 RADIAL S 30 47 51.0 E RP 1681.70510 1416.40818 14 13 CHORD S 29 55 53.5 W 376.4842 1350.99694 1613.53025 15 TAN @PT S 59 12 09.0 W LAT & DEP 0.00534 0.00121 15 HCLOSE N 12 44 54.2 E 0.0055 1351.00228 1613.53146 3 PREC = 1 TO 199878 Area = 69067.60 sq ft 1.58557 ac SULLIVAN RD RD # 4597 * ** NORTH * ** 07/05/84 - 3,541 CURRENT - 4,444 + 5 YRS - 5,407 + 15 YRS - 8,004 + 20 YRS - 9,738 24TH AVE RD # 5951 * ** EAST * ** 07/05/84 - 992 CURRENT - 1,245 + 5 YRS - 1,514 + 15 YRS - 2,242 + 20 YRS - 2,727 CURRENT & PROJECTED TRAFFIC COUNTS Station # 4170 SULLIVAN RD RD # 4597 * ** SOUTH * ** 07/05/84 - 2,829 CURRENT - 3,552 + 5 YRS - 4,322 + 15 YRS - 6,396 + 20 YRS - 7,782 24TH AVE • RD # 5951 * ** WEST * ** 09/12/80 - 1,056 CURRENT - 1,539 + 5 YRS - 1,872 + 15 YRS - 2,771 + 20 YRS - 3,372 These counts are seasonally adjusted by group mean factors. Projected counts are calculated at 4% per year. Press <Return> to continue. PF16 to Exit. EASYDISP Road Number: 6196 Start MP: 00.00 Ending MP: 00.06 Type: None Width (Feet): Pavement Type: Gravel or Stone Surfaced Width (Feet): 30 # of Lanes: 02 Medians PF5 to List Road Intersections. PF15 to Enter new Segment. PF16 To Enter new Road. V1.01 - ROAD SEGMENT INFORMATION - 24TH AVE Function Class: Local Access Rural /Urban: Urban Federal Route #: Shoulders Type: None Left (Feet): 00 Right (Feet): 00 General Information Curbs: None Sidewalks: None 17:43 1 'TIDY? SPO 4 P /, it. S.OKAnf COUNTY CO6071 nO VSC TEL NO:509 S-4715 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 PRIORI FEE AGREEMEN Agreement Number JO/42_3 4- This agreement between Spokane County and Kenneth J. Tupper whose interest in the project is General Partnershi this 17 is entered into day of Anri 'I a , 19 90, This agreement is the project know applicable to th n as: Rid .emontEstate Fourth - Second Addition That the individuals and parties named herein as having an interest In the above described property or project agree to the following; 1. They request that priority review be given to their project, 2. They agree to reimburse Spokane County for project review fees as specified in Board of County Commissioner's Resolution 80- 1592 attachment C, as amended. The fees will be based on overtime costs incurred by Spokane County for project reviews plus a ten percent administrative charge, and will be billed monthly as accrued. 3. The undersigned agrees that these fees are due and payable upon receipt of the billing as specified above. The monthly billing should be sent to the attention of: SULLIVAN SOUTH ENTERPRISES KENNETH J. TUP E. 12929 SPRAGU A SPOKANE, WASHING10N 99216 I understand that failure to pay these fees may result in delay in completion or approval of the project or other possible sanctions: By 14584 P01 1 1 Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260-g-r n rno■ „« ocnn TO THE ORDER OF. TO THE ORDER OF PAY One hundred dollars * *.' • TUPPER & ASSOCIATES, INC - EAST 12929 SPRAGUE AVENUE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99216 928 :1991 PAY One hundred dollars and .00 /100 ** MAIN OFFICE SPOKANE FIRST NATIONAL BANK SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 28 -5 1251 .Spokane County Engineers ; sra Spokane County Engineers 28 -5 1251 DATE 4- 17 -90 • epos 1.125100050': LO;LL17 ;48LL10E1911R MAIN OFFICE SPOKANE FIRST NATIONAL BANK SPOKANE. WASHINGTON DATE 4 -17 -90 CHECK NO. 0 818 3 AMOUNT $100.00 ** TUPPER ASSOCIATES, INC. EAST 12929 SPRAGUE AVENUE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99216; CHECK NO. 0 8 18 2 AMOUNT $100. ** 329/r NAME OF PROPOSAL: '-- Location: SaS - T2S _N. R g_4 Road A pp 1 i can t: .64/(- , , 1.. &LC , Type of Development: Traffic Counts Anticipated A.W.V.T.E. from I.T.E. Manual Existing.R.O.W. 1. Street 1. 2. Street 2. 3. Street 3 , 4. Street 4. Existing Improvements 1. Street 1. 2. Street 2. 3. Street 3. 4. Street 4. Right of Way Required 1. Street 1. 2. Street 2. 3. Street 3. 4. Street 4. EST... �.,., )6-. Continents: ` Improvements Needed to Mitigate Traffic Inpacts of this Development 1. Street 2. Street 2. 3. Street 3. 4. Street' 4. BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION ) OF TIME REQUEST FOR RIDGEMONT ) FINDINGS OF FACT ESTATES NO. 4, PE- 1423 -82, AN ) CONCLUSIONS AND APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT. ) DECISION THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Ken Tupper has been received and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter 1I1, Section G) and RCW 58.17.140. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning. 2. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee/Planning Department/Board of County Commissioners on July 27, 1982. 3. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and department policy for short subdivisions. These criteria are found in Chapter III, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this decision. 4. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation has changed from Suburban to Urban since the original preliminary plat approval. 5. No additional conditions have been recommended by the various reviewing agencies and departments, including the County Engineer's Office, County Health. District, County Utilities and the Department of Building & Safety. 6. This is the fifth request for a time extension. Time extensions have been granted on: August 22, 1985 for a period of one year. December 1, 1986 for a period of one year. December 1, 1988 for a period of two years. December 1, 1990 for a period of two years. The total life of the preliminary plat has been approximately 10 years. 7. The following facts are also relevant. a. The preliminary plat was approved for 284 lots. Eighty -six (86) lots have been finalized in five (5) phases. b . A portion of this preliminary plat has received approval as a preliminary plat known as Ridgemont Estates North (PE- 1684 -92) and is therefore, no longer included within this time extension. Approval is for the area as shown on the preliminary plat of record dated February 3, 1993. c. A parcel of approximately 6.02 acres included in this preliminary plat, has been developed with a church. This parcel was created through the Certificate of Exemption process (see CE- 201 -91). This parcel is no longer included within this approval as shown on the preliminary plat of record dated February 3, 1993. d. The applicant has shown progress in finalizing lots in the past two (2) years, namely finalization of Ridgemont Estates No. 4, 2nd Addition through 5th Addition. 8. This extension of time is granted based upon recent progress. Progress toward finalizing should be shown or future extensions will likely not be granted. RECEIVED JUN 0 3 1993 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER .t Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1423 -82 Page 2 CONCLUSIONS BASED UPON A REVIEW of (a) the criteria for approving an extension of time of the expiration date for a preliminary plat and (b) the above Findings of Fact, the following conclusions are made. 1. The preliminary plat remains consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of Spokane County including the Arterial Road Plan. 2. The applicant/owner should show progress toward complying with Chapter III, Section G; of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time. 3. That a three (3) year extension of time be granted until December 1, 1995 to provide additional time to finalize the plat. DECISION BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request for application PE- 1423 -82, Ridgemont Estates No. 4, is hereby APPROVED until December 1, 1995. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. A consolidated set of applicable conditions of approval is attached. Additionally, the following apply. a. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any portion of this preliminary plat on a lot, ' regardless of size, the sponsor /applicant shall file a final plat for such a lot or create such a lot by a process as determined by the Planning Director. b. A consolidated set of updated conditions of approval is attached. c. • The extension of time is approved for that area as shown on the plat of record dated February 3, 1993. 2. Subsequent extension of time will only be considered upon a Finding of substantial compliance with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance; otherwise the preliminary subdivision approval will become null and void. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5 zone as amended. 2. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. 3. The Planning Director /designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 4. A final plat name shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name to be approved ' by the Planning Director /designee. 5. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. 6. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for three (3) years, specifically to May 1, 1993. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request approximately forty - five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 7. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 8. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: REV 1/90 4i Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1423 -82 Page 3 "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 9. Three (3) current certificates of fide shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 10. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 11. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul -de -sac lots which meet or exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat. 12. A plan Tor water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. 13. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 14. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 15. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state - licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat " including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as- built" water system. 16. The Water Plan and the above four (4) conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director /designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 17.. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 18. Prior to approval of road and drainage plans, you are required to coordinate with the United States Postal Service to determine type and location of central mail delivery facilities which may include applicable easements for developments of three or more homes. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS (As stated in Extension of Time Approval Dated November 30, 1990) 1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. Plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the, direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. REV 1i90 Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1423 -82 Page 4 3. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as- built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right -of- way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 6. All construction within the existing or proposed public right -of -way is to be completed prior to filing each final plat, or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "as- built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 7. Appropriate provision shall be made that the following- described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: a one (1) -foot strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the subdivision boundary. (Temporary cul- de-sacs are required when streets terminate at the subdivision boundaries.) 8. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the county' road system. 9. Dedication of of additional right -of -way along is required. 10. That the final plat boundary be depicted as the westerly section line of Section 25, Township 24 North, Range 44 EWM, and that the total right of way dedication from that line be shown as 43 feet. 11. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from residential lots to . 12. Existing county roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to Spokane County standards. 13. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. 14. Sidewalks are required along the arterials on . 15. That Public Road Standard Typical Roadway Section be Section Number 2 for 16th Avenue with minimum paving width being the Access Standard, Section Number 2 for other public roads within the preliminary plat with minimum paving width being the Access Standard, and Section Number 2 for 24th Avenue with minimum paving width being the Collector Standard. 16. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which resolution establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 17. That Sullivan Road be improved to the Typical Roadway Cross Section designed by the Spokane County Engineer for the Sullivan Road Project CRP 1679. These improvements shall be made on the east half of Sullivan Road along the westerly plat boundary. 18. That the intersection of 20th Avenue as proposed shall be located so that it is compatible with the location of the entrances to the proposed Central Valley Educational Services complex. This shall be coordinated through the office of the County Engineer. 19. That the County Engineering Department shall review and approve, per the existing operation and maintenance agreement, any and all final Plat designs and Plat dedication to assure the continued operation and maintenance of drainage facilities affecting the proposed plat. REV lry0 Extension of Time Findings 20. No direct access to 24th Avenue from Block 10 as shown on Revised Preliminary Plat of Record. 21. Access to 24th Avenue from Lot 7, Block 1, is prohibited. 22. That sidewalks are required along 16th Avenue adjacent to the plat. 23. That a 60 foot wide easement for ingress and egress to the retention pond shall be provided across Lot 45, Block 10. The location of this easement shall be approved by the County Engineer prior to filing of the plat. SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS (UPDATED) 1. The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULM by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Applicant shall make connection to public sewer system. Sewer connection permit is required. Plans and specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS (UPDATED) 1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of any on -site sewage disposal permit or building permit for this project. 2. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 3. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 4. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 5. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibited. DATED THIS ? rd DAY OF JUNE, 1993. William J. Moser Planner I enclosure REV 1/90 '&.__ ��f# File No. PE- 1423 -82 Page 5 Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1423 -82 Page 6 Under state law and county ordinance; you have the right to appeal this decision to the County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing Will scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with $200 processing fee,to the Spokane County Planning Department, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is signcd. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456 -2205. c: County Engineer County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety Sullivan South Enterprises c/o Ken Tupper, E. 12525 Sprague Avenue, Spokane, WA. 99216 Simpson Engineering, N. 909 Argonne Road, Spokane, WA. 99212 File No. PE- 1423 -82 REV 1/90 I� MEMO at the apex on the fan / Y2 452 cfs plus debris load 590 cfs plus debris load (I think) ,. tt TO: FEMA CORRESPONDENCE FILE, RIDGEMONT FILE, I1 FILE, R. HORMANN AND G. NELSON FROM: BRENDA SIMS an — DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1991 SUBJECT: RIDGEMONT AND SUMMERFIELD AND FORKER DRAW FLOOD FLOWS On February 13 Ken Tupper and Chuck Simpson came in to discuss Ridgemont and Summerfield East. On Ridgemont Tammie told them what she had learned from the files, i.e. that the files are unclear as to whether the pond was designed to accommodate flow from all the proposed "upstream" developments or not. Tupper said he would have Dick Mason get back to us. We suggested that starting from scratch to determine the flows the pond needs to handle would probably be simplest since any new developments will have to meet the stormwater requirements in place when the development occurs. The original Ridgemont work was done before the guidelines were formalized. Tupper's objective is to re -work the stormwater pond to make it smaller and probably deeper. . He wants to free up land for additional lots where the pond is currently. Tupper would like to begin work on Summerfield very soon. He wanted to know what he needed to do for the floodplain issue. I told him that we have heard rumors but have nothing in writing to state that all homes on alluvial fans will need flood insurance. If Tupper wants to remove all of Summerfield from the flood zone, he would need to design a stormwater facility to take a hundred year storm. He wanted to know what flow that is. I told him I would contact FEMA for that information. Tupper said he owns property north of Progress and east of Forker (upstream of Summerfield) that could be used for a stormwater facility or he could use the land under the power lines in Summerfield. On February 15 I called Alan Johnson at FEMA. I told him the information I needed and why I need it. He said the flood flows are: He said I should call Larry Basich to get the latest NFI regs re: alluvial fans. He thinks the regs came out in 1989. He referred to section 65.13. He said I should tell the developer that in designing the stormwater facility, he should design for debris load and to meet all the Other special requirements for alluvial fans. I called Basich who was not in, but the person who answered said she would copy the regs and send them to me. I called Tupper's office and left word that I will send him the info. as soon as it comes in. BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION ) OF TIME REQUEST FOR ) PE- 1423 -82 RIDGEMONT ESTATES #4 ) FINDINGS OF FACT AN APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT ) CONCLUSIONS AND WITH REZONE APPROVAL ZE -32 -82 ) DECISION AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY ) RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R -1) ) THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Ken Tupper of Sullivan South Enterprises has been received and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter III, Section G) and RCW 58.17.140. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning. 2. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on July 27, 1982. 3. If finalization of this subdivision does not occur prior to January 1, 1991, the existing zoning will be changed to the appropriate 'new zone,' of the Zoning Code which may have different standards or uses than originally requested. 4. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and department policy for short subdivisions. These criteria are found in Chapter III, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this decision. 5. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation has changed from Suburban to Urban since the original preliminary plat approval. 6. No additional conditions have been recommended by the various reviewing agencies and departments, including the County Engineers Office, County Health District and the Department of Building & Safety. The County Utility Department has recommended an updated condition requiring all lots to be sewered. 7. This is the fourth request for a time extension Time extensions have been granted on: August 22, 1985 for a period of one year December 1, 1986 for a period of two years; and December 1, 1988 for a period of two years. The total life of the preliminary plat has been approximately eight years. 8. The following facts are also relevant. a. The crossover zoning for this plat will be Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) which is consistent with the Urban category of the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan. b. The first phase of the preliminary plat, consisting of 13 lots, was finalized in April, 1990. Currently, there is a second phase in the finalization process consisting of 17 lots. c. During the eight years of preliminary approval, the applicant has not shown significant progress until 1990. 9. This extension of time is granted based upon recent progress. Progress toward finalizing the plat should be shown or future extensions will likely not be granted. r, Extension of Time Findings BASED UPON A REVIEW of (a) the criteria for approving an extension of time of the expiration date for a preliminary plat and (b) the above Findings of Fact, the following conclusions are made. 1. The applicant has made some progress towards finalizing portions of this preliminary plat and should show substantially greater progress toward complying with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time. 2. That a two year extension of time be granted until December 1, 1992 to provide additional time to finalize the plat. Total length of preliminary approval would run a total of ten years. 3. The preliminary plat remains consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of Spokane County. BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request for application PE- 1423 -82 Ridgemont Estates #4 is hereby APPROVED until December 1, 1992. 1. A consolidated set of updated conditions of approval is attached. 2. Subsequent extension of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial compliance with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance; otherwise the preliminary subdivision approval will become null and void. DATED THIS 30 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1990. �/ 7 -J THOMAS VELJIC Planner I Attachment Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with $100 processing fee, to the Spokane County Planning Department, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456 -2205. c: County Engineer County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety Ken Tupper, Sullivan South Enterprises, 12929 E. Sprague, Spokane, WA 99216 Simpson Engineering, 909 N. Argonne Rd, Spokane, WA 99212 File REV 1/90 File No. PE- 1423 -82 Page 2 CONCLUSIONS DECISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS (UPDATED) 1. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. 2. That phasing of the preliminary plat is required as approved by the.County Subdivision Administrator. The purpose is to distribute any impact on the public roadways and public school district over a 5 or more year fmalization period. 3. The time extension approvals may be conditioned in a manner to assure the elimination of conditions which are significantly adverse to or conditions which cause serious deterioration of public health, safety or general welfare, such as traffic safety, overcrowding of school facilities and others. 4. The applicant shall develop subject property in conformance with the site plan presented to the Hearing Body on July 27, 1982. All aspects of the concept and proposal shall be binding on the development, including proposed use. Variations, to be approved by the Planning Director /designee, shall only be allowed to meet regulation standards and conditions of approval. Any other modification must be presented to the Hearing Body for review and approval. 5. A final plat plan name shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name to be approved by the Planning Director /designee. 6. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. 7. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a fmal plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. 9. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision or binding site plan, and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 11. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state - licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat," including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as- built" water system. 12. The Water Plan and the above four (4) conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director /designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 13. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to filing the fmal plat. 14. Upon filing the final plat, or a portion thereof, the zone reclassification of the final plat area shall be finalized, and the existing zone classification shall be changed to Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) (or Single Family Residential (R -1) if finalized prior to January 1, 1991) consistent with the proposed zoning approved with the preliminary plat of record. 15. That the preliminary plat approval is per the revised legal description dated July 26, 1982 to the July 23, 1982 preliminary plat of record. 16. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 17. The final plat plan shall indicate yard setback are lengths on cul -de -sac lots which shall meet or exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat. ENGINEER'S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS (UPDATED) 1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. O Plans, profiles, and cross- sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as- built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right -of -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 6. All construction within the existing or proposed public right -of -way is to be completed prior to filing each final plat, or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "as- built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. Appropriate provision shall be made that the following- described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: a one (1) -foot strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the subdivision boundary. (Temporary cul -de -sacs are required when streets terminate at the subdivision boundaries.) 8. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the county road system. Dedication of 23 feet of additional right -of -way along Sullivan Road is required. That the final plat boundary be depicted as the westerly section line of Section 25, Township 24 North, Range 44 EWM, and that the total right of way dedication from that line be shown as 43 feet. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from residential lots to Sullivan Road. 12. Existing county roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to Spokane County standards. 13. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. Sidewalks are required along the arterials on Sullivan Road and 24th Avenue. 15. That Public Road Standard Typical Roadway Section be Section Number 2 for 16th Avenue with minimum paving width being the Access Standard, Section Number 2 for other public roads within the preliminary plat with minimum paving width being the Access Standard, and Section Number 2 for 24th Avenue with minimum paving width being the Collector Standard. 16. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which resolution establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 17. That Sullivan Road be improved to the Typical Roadway Cross Section designed by the Spokane County Engineer for the Sullivan Road Project CRP 1679. These improvements shall be made on the east half of Sullivan Road along the westerly plat boundary. That the intersection of 20th Avenue as proposed shall be located so that it is compatible with the location of the entrances to the proposed Central Valley Educational Services complex. This shall be coordinated through the office of the County Engineer. That the County Engineering Department shall review and approve, per the existing operation and maintenance agreement, any and all final Plat designs and Plat dedication to assure the continued operation and maintenance of drainage facilities affecting the proposed plat. (2 ) No direct access to 24th Avenue from Block 10 as shown on Revised Preliminary Plat of Record. UTILITY DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS .(UPDATED) Access to 24th Avenue from Lot 7, Block 1, is prohibited. That sidewalks are required along 16th Avenue adjacent to the plat. That a 60 foot wide easement for ingress and egress to the retention pond shall be provided across Lot 45, Block 10. The location of this easement shall be approved by the County Engineer prior to filing of the plat. The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94." 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Applicant shall make connection to public sewer system. Sewer connection permit is required. Plans and specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. HEALTH DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS (UPDATED) 1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of any on -site sewage disposal permit or building permit for this project. 2. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 3. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 4. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 5. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibited. 1 SPOMRH[ COUNTY COURT HOUSE TO Spokane County County Engineer Spokane County Utilities Spokane County Health District Spokane County Department of Building & Safety Fire Protection District 1 Vera Irrigation District Central Valley S.D. #356 FROM: Tom Veljic, Planner I DATE: October 31, 1990 SUBJECT: Extension of Time for PE- 1423 -82, Ridgemont Estates #4 Thank you. kc Enclosure SINDIALMN7E1 fir MEMORANDUM PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached request for an Extension of Time to finalize the plat of PE- 1423 -82 Ridgemont Estates #4. If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should be made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to me by November 14, 1990. c: Sullivan South Enterprises c/o Ken Tupper, E. 12929 Sprague Ave., Spokane, WA 99216 Plat Number: PE ;1423-82 Number of Lots: 284 P Fthda MFRS PLAT EXIE SIQt' OF TIME FORS! Plat Name: Estates 114 Number of Acres: ` . 125 Property Own '`Sul1ivan'South Enterprises Address E ,12929 Spraque ', City, State, Zip: Spokane, Phane�NO 2 8 =1991 ` Sponsor: Sullivan South Enterprises Address• E. 12929 Sprague City, State, Zip: Spokane, WA .99216 Phone No: 5 Engi.rieer/Surveyor: 'Simpson :Engineeriri Address: 909 North Argonne Rd.. City, State, Zip: ' Spokane,' WA':'- 99212':x Phone.Nod. 509-926 -1322 (TO BE CCEPLEPED ONLY IF THE PLAT IS BEING DEVELOPED AND,FINAISZED IN PHAS Number of lots originally.: approved ;:.284; Number of phases finalized to date: Number of lots reuaini g to be finalized '; Number of acres remaining: . . 115 PLEASE PROVIDE US was THE FOLIg3ING "INFORMATION WA 99216` Briefly sinnarize.the.progress to'date, in pteparing.the plat to finalized (i.e., physical cccstruction bonding for improvements, survey r and drafting work, accomplishing various departmental requirements, ob+ain;. or granting ease ants, etc.) The county interceptor for sewerino' was- connected to Ridoement P4.- this-'past summer With the sewercompleti'on we'lwere able "to.finalize Ridgemont'.44, 1st Addition. Ridgemont 94, Additions '2 and 3 are presently under construction The, -. . Planning Commission, County Engineers, and Public Utility Department'have sighed' off on the plans and construction documents'. -- Ridgemont N4,'2nd Addition has water; sewer, power, drainage, curbing, and weather permitting; we:will complete paving this year. Ridgemont N4, 3rd Addition is presently' Under .construction and we are are currently installing sewer and water. With the completion of these improvements, there will be 41 lots,fu developed in Ridgemont Est (Over) • .: Can S 7a Sullivaro South• eneral Par ner, Signed: This year's housing market has been much stronger than in the last ten years and we look forward to a° stable, positive economy. Our plans are to continue phasing in additions to Ridgemont. With that as our goal, we'd like to request the maximum extension of time due to our commitment and dollars invested. We look forward to finalising Additions 2 and 3 soon to bring thist:project.[to :fruition. Sta. U. L. Dens. Jffset Read - ings Avg. Corr.Ga % Std. % Rice Sta. /k to Sta. Depth - orr.UL Control ACP Lot No. I Tons ?61 O t'3>, 5'4 3' 0 /42.1 /42.5 /421 914 9Z. ATB Thick Z" /41.0 Cl ass Q Lane: . or Rt. E, F, ; EB, WB G B, S olberlane I t3. 'q• II'Lt jgq,z i e 93'� 93 n col the IOtV /q4.8 6 v Other 140.4 1421 mihrrlane 21'96 JO ' /42.7 /vfZ 1 140,E i42,) 7Z• I Leveling Std.Density Rolle Passes Temp: Mat Remarks Wearing Rollers /ZtcnVib pion 54t'a_ 1414 Rice Rice Density/S*Z T' c Passes S 7'1 111317 11-14.1 6” 1.4 /9i.z /91. 23 IZtenV;b. V ton %tic 12. Temp: Mat 7 ° Air o /44.5 Remarks 7YZYO o.K. 1t7 mi ne. 5 +52 9' R4 /42.1 /42 0 9Z I 3 1O° Ai r 7S 14 772.90 oK Sum 9 2.7 Avg. Avg. Gauge Correction Factor Sta. U.L. Dens. Jffset Read- ings Avg. Corr.Ga % Std. % Rice Sta. 7t 0 to Sta. /3t IY Depth - orr.UL Control Lot No. 'Z Tons L78 Zaad/ue 7 -t7p• 5'4 1q1.q 141,..z. 914 ACP ATB Thick Z" ATB Thick" /41.0 Class B C, E, F G Other Lt. or R E W NB, SB Z ? rag- IS'R� 'q• /41 93'� n col the IOtV 6 v 14o, 140.4 1421 9 2 Leveling Wearing 2'Rl- 140,E i42,) Std.Density Rice Dens itY lyq,Z Z edA 111 10 Rollers /ZtcnVib pion 54t'a_ Rice 142.1 Passes S 13RIAJa- 13 +10 6” 1.4 /9i.z /91. it(I.7 12. Temp: Mat 7 ° Air o Remarks 7YZYO o.K. Sum Avg. 92,1 Gauge Correction Factor Sta. U.L. Dens. Jffset Read- ings Avg. Corr.Ga % Std. % Rice Sta. to Sta. Depth Corr.UL Control ACP Lot No. Tons ATB Thick" Class B, C, E, F, G Lane: Lt. or Rt.; EB, WB, NB, SB Other Leveling Std.Density Rollers Passes Temp: Mat Remarks Wearing Density Rice Air Sum Avg. Gauge Correction Factor Contract No.(fll'j No. Gauge No. 44, Section R ( — > / 4 Inspector Comments: ACP -1 Street Inspector ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMPACTION CONTROL REPORT INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE Date 7 -03 -70 Project Engineer S,',1fA0 Ens. WC. Contractor 11 , �f 5T7) n f 10 sip It15 '; �n r(1I de Soc 5au1l ro IJor h) 5T'6l J f 15 10 sT14 5 +53 T,;�1 In. la � . iuth is Oath ) " FROM:SPOkANE COUNTY PLANh;_"15, File No: PE- 1423 -82 Name: RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO. 4 cc: IPEC County Engineers County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety TO:ENGINEER'S EXTENSION OF TIME SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR FINDINGS OF FACT DECISION N : EH 27, 1989 11 :13AM P.02 1. That the preliminary plat was originally approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee in a public hearing on July 27, 1982, 2. That the zoning will be reclassified from Agricultural to-R -1: 3. That the Comprehensive Plan is designated as Suburban and is within the PSSA area. That since the original approval, the applicant has coordinated with the Spokane County Utilities Department concerning extension of sewer service to the subject property. In addition, a one -year extension of time was approved on August 25, 1985. That an additional condition has been recommended by County Health District with the request that conditions on the preliminary plat approval involving the allowance of on -site sewage systems be removed and the following dedicatory language be included in the plat: "A public sewer system will be.made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each tract prior to sale: Use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized." 6. Public notice was given as required by the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and no comments were received from the public. Based on the foregoing findings, the Subdivision Administrator APPROVES an Extension of Time for two (2) years to December 1, 1988, subject to the conditions based upon Extension of Time guidelines of Subsection 2, Chapter 3, Section "G ", Spokane County Subdivision Ordinanc DDl'ti`LA S. ADAMS Subdivision Administrator FROM :SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNIk ". TO :ENGINEER'S File No: PE- 1423 -82 ZE -32 -82 Name: RIDGEMONT ESTATES #4 EXTENSION OF TJME REQUEST SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR FINDINGS OF FACT --EH 27, 1989 11 :13AM P.03 1. That the preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on July 27th, 1982. 2. That the zoning upon final plat recording be changed from Agricultural to R -1. 3. That the Comprehensive Plan is designated as Suburban. The Comprehensive Plan Landuse Designation remains the same since the original approval. 4. That since the original approval, the applicant has worked with the County Utilities Department on extension of sewer service to the proposal. The sewer system (County) which is to service this subdivision are under construction. The only economic feasible choice was to waft for sewer to become available. When sewer is available the only question remaining would be economic considerations for maketing. 5. That no additional conditions have been recommended by reviewing County Departments including; County Engineer, Utilities Department, Health District and Building and Safety Department, 6. That this Is the third, request for a time extension. 7. That Extension of Time requests for subdivisions are controlled based on RCW 58.17.140 and Chapter III Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. That the above Section G #3 provides for Extension of Time requests to be approved which preliminary approvals are tled to public services which are not yet available and not public services that the sponsor would normally fund, P/ FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY PLRNNJNG TO :ENGINEER'S Extension of Time Findings Pre DECISION - FEB 27, 1989 11:14fAM P.04 Based on the foregoing findings, the Subdivision Administrator APPROVES an Extension of Time for 2 years to, December 1st, 1990, subject to the following conditions. Condition of Approval 1. All those conditions of approval as attached with the original Findings and Order of July 27th, 1982, and Time Extension approvals with the modification that preliminary plat approval shall be extended to December 1st, 1990. PAUL JENSEN Assistant Subdivision dnti istrator /2 r SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS 8 ORDER DATE: AUGUST 22, 1985 RE: PE- 1423 -82, RIDGEMONT ESTATES 1 ;Y4 2E- 132 -82, Agricultural to R -1 1. That the sponsor is requesting a Time Extension for one year of the approved preliminary plat to divide 125 acres into 284 lots for single family dwellings. 2. That the proposal is located adjacent to and bound by 16th Avenue, Sullivan and 24th Avenue in the Spokane Valley in Section 25, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. 3. That the item has been properly advertised in accordance with state and local regulations. 4. That the Committee has considered and evaluated the information and conditions contained in the Planning Report for this proposal. r -t. 5. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Suburban and the proposal appears generally consistent with the density and use guidelines of this category. 6. That the Committee finds the proposal compatible with existing uses in the area. ON(y -Other -the» the sponsor was present and there was neither anyone for nor against the proposal. 8. That the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act have been complied with. 9. The staff is directed to assist in resolving sewer concerns in conjunction with the sponsor in the development of this plat. The staff shall explore the possibility of bonding methods for this plat as is accomplished by the City of Spokane in the West Plains area. CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the above findings concludes that the application fora Time Extension of preliminary plat PE- 1423 -82, RIDGEMONT ESTATES #4 and Zone Change ZE- 32 -82, Agricultural to R -1 be APPROVED for one J. - -.. ...44L 4M.. PnnM4lnn.. AP Annnnusl Eerd WCBT:TT 686T 'L? E3d S,N33NI9JN3:01 ONINNdld AlNf00 3NH710dS:W0ad Nfe .2q,1 485' TO'd WdLT:TT 6861 'L? E3d r PE- 1423 -82, RIDGEMONT ESTATES #4 IN REFERENCE TO THE ATTACHED FINDINGS d ORDER THE HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE E ADOPTS THFOLLOWING UPDATED CONDITIONS TOGET WITH PREVIOUS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Spokane County Utilities Department Updated Conditions: 1. The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuatnt to RCW 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW 36.94." 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Connection is to be made to an interim public sewer. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer • o are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities De 5,a33NIONE:Ol ONINNH1d .11N10O 3NHNOd5:W0ad I HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS & ORDER PE- 1423 -82 VOTE: Unanimously Approved Spokane County Subdivision Administrator THE HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTESTS TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS AND CO CtUSION '.0 VOTE. 1" (4 fibt_gi 1985 DATE £0'd WHET:TT 686T `L? 93d ScJ33NIJN3:01 9JNINNti1d 3•010d5:W021d File No: Name: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR FINDINGS OF FACT PE- 1423 -82 RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO. 4 EXTENSION OF TIME 1. That the preliminary plat was originally approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee in a public hearing on July 27, 1982. 2. That the zoning will be reclassified from Agricultural to R -1. 3. That the Comprehensive Plan is designated as Suburban and is within the PSSA area. 4. That since the original approval, the applicant has coordinated with the Spokane County Utilities Department concerning extension of sewer service to the subject property. In addition, a one -year extension of time was approved on August 25, 1985. 5. That an additional condition has been recommended by County Health District with the request that conditions on the preliminary plat approval involving the allowance of on -site sewage systems be removed and the following dedicatory language be included in the plat: "A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each tract prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized." 6. Public notice was given as required by the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and no comments were received from the public. cc: IPEC County Engineers County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety DECISION Based on the foregoing findings, the Subdivision Administrator APPROVES an Extension of Time for two (2) years to December 1, 1988, subject to the conditions based upon Extension of Time guidelines of Subsection 2, Chapter 3, Section "G ", Spokane County Subdivision Ordinanc DO S. ADAMS Subdivision Administrator SEOKAMC COUnty COUNT MOUSE DATE: November 23 , 1988 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 - 2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 TO: County •Fngineers• Utilities Health District Buildine & Safety FROM: DOUGLAS S. ADAMS. Subdivision Administrator Thank you. DSA:jp Enclosure PE- 1423 -82 Ridiems The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached request for an Extension of lime to finalize the plat of Ridgemont Estates No. 4. If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should be made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to us by December 15th, 1988. RECEIVER NOV 28 bbd 12 -2 -88 We have reviewed the time extension request and have no new conditions to add. / Bob MCCann Land Development Coordinator Office of the County Engineer 12 -2 -88 SPOKANE COUNTY COURT MOUCC DATE: November 23 1988 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 TO: County Ennineers: Utilities: Health District: Building & Safety FROM: DOUGLAS S. ADAMS. Subdivision Administrator SUBJECT: Fxtensinn of Time PE- 1423 -82 Ridgemont Estates Nn.4 RECEIVED NOV z 8 19bd The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached request for an Extension of Time to finalize the plat of Ridgemont Estates No. 4. If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should be made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to us by December 15th, 1988. Thank you. DSA:jp Enclosure We have reviewed the time extension request and have no new conditions to add. Bob MCCann Land Development Coordinator Office of the County Engineer 12 -2 -88 SPOKANE COUNTY COURT MOUSE DATE: November 23 1988 PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECUV'S! NOV 2 8188d BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 - 2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 TO: County Engineers: Utilities: Health District: Builder & Safety FROM: DOUGLAS S. ADAMS. Subdivision Administrator Sl1R IFCT: Extension of Time PE- 1423 -82 Ridgemont Estates No.4 The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached request for an Extension of Time to finalize the plat of Ridgemont Estates No. 4. If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should be made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to us by December 15th, 1988. Thank you. DSA:jp Enclosure We have reviewed the time extension request and have no new conditions to add. Bob MCCann Land Development Coordinator Office of the County Engineer 4 Inter- office Communication To Spokane County Subdivision Administrator 02W From Subject S.okane Count En•ineer Time Fxtenstnn Requesr OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON We have reviewed the files of the plats listed below. We have no additional conditions to add at this time. RST /BMc /lvb PE 1195 -78 Sunrise Mountain Estates PE 1170C -78 Columbia Park Replat $4 PE 13 - 9 H.A.V. Addition PE 1423 -82 Ridgemont Estates PS -82 Cheney 's a es Date 1 October 6 19 86 cauityEngineer; Utilities; Health District; T0: Building & Safety FROM: SUBJECT' The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached requests for Extensions of Time to finalize the plats. If you have c e- proposed extensions or believe additional conditions should- x-tgiof the p plat approval, please forward comments to ut by Octntar 1986. Thank DSA:dj • COUKTflAUlla Douglas S. Adams. Subdivision Administrator Extensions of Time Review PE- 1195 -78, Sunrise Mountain Estates PE- 11700 -78, PE- 1313 -79, PE- 1423 -82, PS- 1422 -82, INTEROFFICE r'VMO OFFICE 1}E Samkginarna Conn PLANING DFPARRENT DATE October 2 1986 Columbia Park Replat No. 4 H A V Addition Ridgeront Estates #4 Cheney Estates • m P E MCRANDUi (CHECK ONE Ba O . RECEIVED OCT 3 1986 Couary Engineeriaj From Subject 4. • WEST TERRACE - ' requested change of,condi stipulated. for the:approva NEW CONDITIONS. OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Data August 1, • 4 1475 - The County Engineer's Depart t has reviewed the ons application.. The- Conditions f Approval which were 1 , November - 1984 are applica'l,e,to,this,request. f n ..n.... A. Private roads. which a 'constr ted'to' access to lots having, frontage• on a dedicated roadway,`but do n.t ve "physical .access .to that roadway, must be d, -constructe in compliance with .pokane County.. Road Standards. Th roads 4. shall comply with,.the provis` ons'of: the Spokane County. Fire "Code, where applicable. B. That prior to'fina zation of.Phase the applicant shallypetition:.for'. the vacation of,.:road ights -of -way vihich l;ocateclwithin the proposed golf course. iApplicant hall also initiate :swat .n of those portions of the plat and>'road right -o - ways.. abutting the golf;`cours= - 4 1 4 Inter- office Communication To Spokane County .Subdivision Administrator Spokane County Engineer Agenda Items Scheduled for Hearing - August 23,"1985 1. RIDGEMONT ESTATES #4 -`PE 1423 -82 - The County Engineers,has no additional. comments to make relative to this time extension request.;. All original . "Conditions of:. ' Approval" are applicable. . • LARSON ESTATES 1ST ADDITION - PS 1198-78 The Engineer has no )ddik nal= comments make relative to this time extension request:, All orginal "Conditions of °s Approval" a : those added at subsequent time extensionrequests are :applicable. 3: .BROADWAY OFESSIONAL' CENTER:1SrADDITION PE 1509- See attached comments. Hearing Examiner Committee Actions - August 22, 1935 EXTENSIOIJ OF TIME 2.( PE- 1423-82, RIDGEMONT ESTATES #4 ZE- 32 -82, Agricultural to R -1 SPONSOR: 928 -1991 SURVEYOR /ENGINEER: 535 -1410 Sullivan South Enterprises E. 12929 Sprague Avenue Spokane, WA. 99216 LOCATION: Located adjacent to and bound by 16th Avenue, Sullivan Road and 24th Avenue in the Spokane Valley in Section 25 Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: SUBURBAN, within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. PROPOSAL: The sponsor is requesting a time extension for one year of the approved preliminary plat to divide 125 acres into 284 lots for single family dwellings. Action: Unanimously approved to September 1, 1986. PRELIMI!JARY SUBDIVISION, ZONE RECLASSIFICATION & FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 3. PE- 1509 -85, BROADWAY PROFESSIONAL CENTER II ZE -67 -85 Agricultural Suburban to Residential Office VE- 108 -85 Front Yard Setback SPONSOR: 923 =7096 SURVEYOR /ENGINEER• 35-1410 Bruce AlbertusN Patrick oore N. 1014 Pines Road, S. 2 ltamont Spokane, WA. 99206 \\ Sp ane, WA. 99202 LOCATIONJ: Located north of . d adjacent to Broadway Avenue approxi- mately 200 feet west of P' . Road in Section 16, Township 25t1, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane, Was ngto COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: RBAN, within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. PROPOSAL: T. establish a professional business center for individual ownership .f 2 lots with common open space. The proposed zone change is from gricultural Suburban to Residential fice. The applicant's PUD site plan contains provisions for landscape and sight- obscuring fencing. The sponsor has also requested a 15 foo variance from the minimum front yard setback of 25 feet, as specifie y Chapter 4.20.100 (a) of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. Action: Unanimously Approved. Inland Pacific Engineering S. 25 Altamont Spokane, WA 99202 RE: (_ PE- 1423 -82; RIDGEMONT ESTATES #4 ZE- 132 -82, Agricultural to R -1 RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE AUG a3 1985 FINDINGS & ORDER Couuiy Engineering DATE: AUGUST 22, 1985 1. That the sponsor is requesting a Time Extension for one year of the approved preliminary plat to divide 125 acres into 284 lots for single family dwellings. 2. That the proposal is located adjacent to and bound by 16th Avenue, Sullivan and 24th Avenue in the Spokane Valley in Section 25, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. 3. That the item has been properly advertised in accordance with state and local regulations. 4. That the Committee has considered and evaluated the information and conditions contained in the Planning Report for this proposal. 5. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Suburban and the proposal appears generally consistent with the density and use guidelines of this category. 6. That the Committee finds the proposal compatible with existing uses in the area. Only . - Other - than the sponsor was present and there was neither anyone for nor against the proposal. 8. That the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act have been complied with. 9. The staff is directed to assist in resolving sewer concerns in conjunction with the sponsor in the development of this plat. The staff shall explore the possibility of bonding methods for this plat as is accomplished by the City of Spokane in the West Plains area. CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the above findings concludes that the application for a Time Extension of preliminary plat PE- 1423 -82, RIDGEMONT ESTATES #4 and Zone Change ZE- 32 -82, Agricultural to R -1 be APPROVED for one year, until September 1, 1986 in accordance with the Conditions of Approval attached to the plat. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS & ORDER PE- 1423 -82 VOTE: Unanimously Approved A�T: DOUGLAS ' ADAMS Spokane County Subdivision Administrator THE HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTESTS TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS AND CO CLUSION D VOTE. z2 ?Vr DATE IN REFERENCE TO THE ATTACHED FINDINGS & ORDER, THE HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE ADOPTS THE FOLLOWING - UPDATED CONDITIONS TOGETHER WITH PREVIOUS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Spokane County Utilities Department Updated Conditions: The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuatnt to RCW 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW 36.94." �2 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. \3. Connection is to be made to an interim public sewer. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer , c io. are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities De .2a, I q$s PE- 1423 -82, RIDGEMONT ESTATES #4 AGENDA, August 22, 1985 - HEARING.EXAMINER COMMITTEE EXTENSION OF TIME 2. PE- 1423 -82, RIDGEMONT ESTATES #4 Page 6 ZE- 32 -82, Agricultural to R -1 SPONSOR: 928 -1991 SURVEYOR /ENGINEER: 535 -1410 Sullivan South Enterprises E. 12929 Sprague Avenue Spokane, WA. 99216 Inland Pacific Engineering S. 25 Altamont Spokane, WA 99202 LOCATION: Located adjacent to and bound by 16th Avenue, Sullivan Road and 24th Avenue in the Spokane Valley in Section 25 Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: SUBURBAN, within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. PROPOSAL: The sponsor is requesting a time extension for one year of the approved preliminary plat to divide 125 acres into 284 lots for single family dwellings. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION, ZONE RECLASSIFICATION & FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 3. PE- 1509 -85, BROADWAY PROFESSIONAL CENTER II Page 7 ZE -67 -85 Agricultural Suburban to Residential Office VE- 108 -85 Front Yard Setback SPONSOR: 928 -7096 SURVEYOR /ENGINEER: 535 -1410 Bruce Albertus N. 1014 Pines Road Spokane, WA. 99206 - 2 - Patrick Moore S. 25 Altamont Spokane, WA. 99202 LOCATION: Located north of and adjacent to Broadway Avenue approxi- mately 200 feet west of Pines Road in Section 16, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane, Washington. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: URBAN, within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. PROPOSAL: To establish a professional business center for individual ownership of 2 lots with common open space. The proposed zone change is from Agricultural Suburban to Residential Office. The applicant's PUD site plan contains provisions for landscaping and sight- obscuring fencing. The sponsor has also requested a 15 foot variance from the minimum front yard setback of 25 feet, as specified by Chapter 4.20.100 (a) of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance: - 6 - SPOKANE COUMTv COUNT HOUSE HEARING AGENDA, August 22, 1985 9 A.M. (or as soon thereafter as possible) EXTENSION OF TIME 2. , i ,PE- 1423 -82, ,RIDGEMONT ESTATES #4 ZE- 32 -82, Agricultural to R -1 SPONSOR: 928 -1991 Sullivan South Enterprises E. 12929 Sprague Avenue Spokane, WA. 99216 IS311 . HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING - August 22, 1985 PLACE:, Broadway Centre Building 2nd Floor, Public Hearing Room N. 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA Telephone: 456 -2205 TIME: The hearing will begin at 9 A.M. and recess from 12 NOON to 1:30 P.M. for lunch. Items not heard prior to 5 P.M. adjournment will be continued to the next available date as announced by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee. SURVEYOR /ENGINEER: 535 -1410 Inland Pacific Engineering S. 25 Altamont Spokane, WA 99202 LOCATION: Located adjacent to and bound by 16th Avenue, Sullivan Road and 24th Avenue in the Spokane Valley in Section 25 Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: (PSSA) boundary. PROPOSAL: The sponsor is requesting time extension for one year of the approved preliminary plat to d ivide 125 acres into 284 lots for single family dwellings. SUBURBAN, within the Priority Sewer Service Area BRfOG ELLEfl N•4 - 1423 -82\i ZE -32 -82 \ � 83 0510 of 8306130250 SULLIVAN ROAD PROJECT (CRP -1679) - RIDGMONT ESTATES NO. 4 AGREEMENT r rut `t 641. FAS€ 1428 THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 7 day , 1983, by and between Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at West 1116 Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as the "County," and Sullivan South Enterprises, having offices for the transaction of business at East 12929 Sprague Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99216 hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," jointly, hereinafter referred to as the "Parties." W I T N E S S E T H : WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Revised Code of Washington Section 36.32.120(6) the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County has the care of County pro- perty and the management of County funds and business; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW Chapter 58.17 and RCW Chapter 36.70, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County have established a Hearing Examiner System, which system is responsible, pursuant to County ordinances, for approving subdivisions and zone changes within the un- incorporated areas of Spokane County, Washington; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW Chapters 36.75 and 36.81 the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County through the Spokane County Engineer has the authority to establish, construct and maintain County roads; and \, WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW Chapters 36.75 and 36.81 the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County through the Engineering Department is improving certain portions of Sullivan Road, located within Spokane County, Washington, such project being known as CRP -1679 (Sullivan Road); and WHEREAS, pursuant to findings and order dated July 27, 1982, the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee approved the preliminary plat known as Ridgmont Estates No. 4 and accompanying zone change (PE- 1423 -82 and ZE 32 -82), said preliminary approval being a subdivision of 125 acres into 284 lots for single family dwellings; and WHEREAS, the findings and order of July 27, 1982 approving Ridgmont Estates No. 4 included certain condi- tions relative to the obligation of the Developer herein to improve Sullivan Road and dedicate additional rights -of- way thereon; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with the County Sullivan Road Project (CRP- 1679), the County will necessarily be performing certain obligations of the Developer herein along Sullivan Road; however, it is understood by the parties hereto that the Developer's obligations as set forth in the findings and order dated July 27, 1982 are not triggered until that phase or phases within the Ridgmont Estates No. 4 are finalized requiring the use of Sullivan Road between 16th Avenue and 24th Avenue; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto now desire to formalize their understanding with respect to the County's Sullivan Road Project (CRP -1679) and the obligations of the Developer in conjunction with Ridgmont Estates No. 4 along Sullivan Road; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises set forth hereinafter, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: 1. Spokane County in conjunction with the Sullivan Road Project, known as (CRP -1679) will perform a certain por- tion of the obligations of the Developer herein as more particularly set forth in the findings and order dated July 27, 1982 in conjunction with the Ridgmont Estates No. 4 Subdivi- sion on Sullivan Road; namely, the improving from the inter- section of 16th Avenue and Sullivan Road within Spokane -2- ? t '641 .FA4E 1429 yoi: 641. FEE 1430 County, Washington south 300 feet and then from that point taper the paving on Sullivan Road south an additional 300 feet. All work referred to under this paragraph will be done pursuant to the provisions of approved plans and specifications on file in the Spokane County Engineering Office for the Sullivan Road Project (CRP- 1679). 2. In consideration of Spokane County performing those obligations set forth in paragraph 1 hereinabove in con- junction with the Sullivan Road Project (CRP- 1679), the Developer and the County acknowledge that at such time as the Ridgmont Estates No. 4 Subdivision is finalized either in whole or in phases so that that portion of Sullivan Road between 16th Avenue and 24th Avenue is used by the subdivision or portion thereof finalized, the Developer shall be responsible for reimbursing Spokane County for the 300 feet of improvement from 16th Avenue South on Sullivan Road 300 feet in conjunction with the County Road Project No. 1679. It is understood by the parties hereto, that at the present time it is anticipated that the approximate cost for improving Sullivan Road from the intersection of 16th Avenue south 300 feet is $45.19 per lineal foot for a total cost of $13,556. To the extent that the actual costs either exceed or are less than anticipated herein, the parties hereto acknowledge that this agreement will be so modified to reflect actual costs. Actual costs will be computed pursuant to cost paid by Spokane County to the successful bidder in conjunction with Sullivan Road Project (CRP- 1679). It is further understood and agreed by the parties hereto, that in lieu of the Developer reimbursing Spokane County for that tapering along Sullivan Road in conjunction with the Sullivan Road Project commencing 300 feet south of the intersection of 16th Avenue and Sullivan Road and then running an additional 300 feet south, the Developer, shall be responsible for providing a 300 foot taper commencing at -3- i -4- oi: 641 Par 1431 the intersection of 24th Avenue and Sullivan Road and running south on Sullivan Road 300 feet. The obligation of the Developer to provide that tapering on Sullivan Road commencing at the intersection of 24th Avenue and running 300 feet south on Sullivan Road shall be triggered at such time as all of the Ridgmont Estates No. 4 plat is finalized or that phase thereof which requires the improving of Sullivan Road between 16th Avenue and 24th Avenue is finalized. The 300 feet of tapering to be provided by the Developer pursuant to this paragraph shall be undertaken pursuant to those plans and specifications as approved by the County Engineer. Such plans shall follow materally those approved plans and specifica- tions for the tapering commencing south 300 feet of the inter- section of 16th Avenue and Sullivan Road and running south 300 feet on Sullivan Road. 3. It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto, that in the event the Developer herein does not finalize Ridg- mont Estates No. 4 in toto, or in such phase or phases to require the use of Sullivan Road between 16th Avenue and 24th Avenue that the obligations of the Developer herein, as set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be null and void. 4. It is understood and agreement by the parties hereto that the obligations as set forth herein between the Developer and the County shall clarify those conditions set forth in the findings of fact, decision and order dated July 27, 1982 in conjunction with the Ridgmont Estates No. 4 Subdivision, a photocopy of which is attached hereto as Attachment "A" and incorporated herein by reference. To the extent that there is any inconsistency between the provisions of this agreement and the provisions within the findings and order dated July 27, 1982, attached hereto as Attachment "A" the provisions within this agreement shall be controlling. ATTEST: W ' LI DONAHUE C1, 'z $ + .; Board B tity'Clerk SULLIVAN SOUTH ENTERPRISES By: 5. This agreement is one which shall run with that parcel of property preliminarily approved as Ridgment Estates No. 4 Subdivision and designated as PE- 1423 -82 and ZE- 32 -82. 6. No modification or amendment to this agreement shall be valid until the same is reduced to writing and executed with the same formality as this present agreement. 7. This agreement contains all the terms and condi- tions agreed upon by the parties. No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this agree- ment shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. Both parties have read and understand all the terms Of this agreement and state that no representations, promises, or agreements not expressed in this agreement have been made to induce either to execute the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed on the day and year set forth hereinabove. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SSP•./ E COUNT SHINGTON FILED OP IL.CORJEO4 JUN 13 3 ss PR '93 WFLt.MH c. 90u4DUE QUDt76R MIME count c N SW —5— ,Ct q . Cbull±A o< -ca-<� SNELL STAFF REPORT 0 July 22, 1982 9oi: 641ivf 1433 T0: SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION BEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF RE: PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE- 1423 -82, RIDGEMONT ESTATES No. 4 ZE -32 -82 AGRICULTURAL to R -1 and AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. SPONSOR: 928 -1991 SURVEYOR /ENGINEER: 534 -1410 Sullivan South Enterprieses Inland Pacific Engineering E. 12929 Sprague Avenue S. 25 Altamont Street Spokane, WA 99216 Spokane, WA 99202 B. LOCATION: The proposal is located adjacent and bound by 16th Avenue, Sullivan Road - and 24th Avenue. C. PROPOSAL: The sponsor proposes to divide 139 acres into 285 singie- family residential lots; lot sizes ranging from 10,000 sq.ft. up to 1+ acre lots. The existing Agriculutral zone is proposed to be changed to R -1 for the 139 acres, except lots 35 -40 and 42 -45 of Block 10 which are proposed to be Agricultural Suburban zoning. II. SITE /VICINITY INFORMATION A. Site Size 13.9 acres B. Site Characteristics The site is a generally flat, undeveloped parcel currently in Agricultural cultivated use. It is bounded on three sides by paved streets, 16th Avenue on the north, Sullivan Avenue on the west, and 24th Avenue on the south, and on the east by the " Ridgemont Bluff" ridge, which rises quickly in elevation approximately 100+ feet. C. Community Characteristics The proposal site abutta a neighborhood called Rotchford Arce Tracts to the north which consists primarily of single- family residences on one acre lots, most of which have horses. To the east and on the ridge overlooking this site is a neighborhood called Ridgemont Estates, which consists of single- family residential develop- ment on lots of approximately 1/2 acre in size. South of the proposed development is the residential neighborhood of Tamberlane. Typical lots range from 13,500 square feet to 21,000 square feet. The land west of Sullivan Road is presently under cultivation, b , Central Valley School District has proposed the development of their Educational Service Center for 15 acres of this land from 16th Avenue to 20th Avenue if extended. S -G15 / r In summary, this site is surrounded on three sides by existing single - family residential neighborhoods. The proposal constitutes "fill -in" by creating another residential neighborhood of 139 acres within this 'slat- ing community. Existing Zoning Site - the existing zoning of the proposal site is Agricultural established in 1942. North - The existing zone classification is Agricultural Suburban, established in 1973. (Rotchford Acre Tracts.) West - the existing zone classification is Agricultural, established in 1942. South - the existing zone classification is R -1 established in 1968 (Tamberlane Subdivisions); and Agricultural, established in 1942 East - the existing zone classification is R1 established in 1975. (The original Ridgemont Estates.) 27 Attachment "A" STAFF REPORT, July 22, 82 II. SITE /VICINITY INFORMATION (Cont) SR -G16 /r PS- 1423 -82 $Q 641 FAI143 E. Proposed Zoning Propose to change the Agricultural zoning to R -1, except propose Agricultural Suburban zoning on lots 35 -40 and lots 42 -45, block 10. F. Existing Land Use Site - the site is vacant, currently being cultivated for agriculturdl'i purposes. North - Single - family residential neighborhood on one acre lots. West - predominantly undeveloped under agricultural use with few residences. South - single - family residential neighborhood. East - single- family residential neighborhood. G. Proposed Land Use Propose single- family residences. B. Proposed Lot Sizes Lot size range from 10,000 square foot to over one acre in size. Specifically, the preliminary plat proposes: 115 - 10,000 square foot or larger lots adjacent and east of Sullivan Road that involve 27% of the site. 109 - 12,500 square foot to 20,000 square foot lots through the center of the site and one row of lots along 16th and 24th Avenues that involve 34% of the site. 61 -1/2 acre and larger lots in the remaining east portion of the site, which involves 39% of the site. I. Number of Lots 285 - single - family residential lots. J. Density The overall or average gross density is 21,245 square '. foot lot size (number of lots divided into the total: acreage- -139 acres divided by 285 m .48 acres /lot). The overall or average net density is 19,120 square foot lot size (number of lots divided into the total acreage minus 10% for roads - - -139 acres minus 13.9 acres for roads divided by 285 = .44 acres /lot). Design of Proposal Existing Timberlane is proposed to extends north from 24th Avenue through the site in a curvilinear manner and connects to 16th Avenue. Existing Limerick Road is proposed to be extended south and west through the site from 16th Avenue and connects as the only access onto Sullivan Road on alignment with 20th Avenue extended from the vest. These two proposed roads form an "X" type circulation pattern through the site. The proposal design also employes 13 cul -de -sac's to create "non - through" traffic patterns for safe residential areas and 6 of these are 'Y used to assure no access onto Sullivan Road. Both 16th and 24th Avenues have individual driveway access from lots proposed along these avenues. L. Development Timing The sponsor proposes to phase the development of this preliminary plat, in part, as a means of mitigating increased popula- tion and traffic impacts.on the existing public facilities and services. The phasing would be for a 5 to 10 year period depending on the local economy and its housing market. 28 .STAYI RRPORT, July 22, 1982 II. BITE /VICINITY INFORMATION SR -G17 /r 29 PE- 1423-82 ;aL v`i 641 FACE 1435 M. Circulation County Engineering Department is recommending that 23 ` feet be added to the Sullivan Road right -of -way and that no direct access from the lot along Sullivan Road be allowed to assure proper safety for a major arterial, and that all roads be constructed to county road standards.' Recognizing the additional traffic this proposal will create once developed, Sullivan will have ample capacity for this future traffic. Sullivan Road from 16th Avenue to Sprague Avenue is currently in the final engineering design stages and pending approval of these' road plans "Letting of bids" for construction of Sullivan Road improvements will take place in Fall 1982 with construction taking place in 1983. Current road plans are for 4 lanes from 16th to Sprague with a signal (in the future) at 16th and Sullivan intersection. N. Drainage Plan The County Engineering Department is recommending the standard condition for a licensed engineer to develop a drainage plan to assure conformance to County and State laws regarding surface run -off, all prior to finalizing this preliminary plat. 0. Sewage Disposal The County Utilities Department is recommending that an interim sewer system be required per the Wastewater Management Plan, and that a sewer system be designed by a licensed engineer and approved by County Utilities Department prior to finalizing this preliminary plat. The location of sewer pump station(s), the point of connection to the Valley Sewer Trunkline and the proposal's sewer system design will all need to be engineered and coordinated. In addition, the County Utilities Department has made the following findings: 1. A 285 lot subdivision (phased or not phased) is large enough to support sewer operation and maintenance costs without deficits prior to full development. 2. The eminence of the Valley interceptor suggests that immediate sewer hook up to an interim system would cause the least amount of dis- turbance to houses and lots within this proposed plat. The future sewer connection to the Valley interceptor would take place by connecting the interim sewer system rather than making a connection on each lot. 3. The topographical features of the project suggest that local sewer collection lines should be designed and constructed with the propos- ed subdivision (or each platted phase) as well as designing the sewer collector line which will connect this project with the Valley interceptor. This will allow proper location of local lift stations, force mains and other sewer lines if needed as a part of a permanent system. The Spokane County Health District also recommends the installation of • "wet" sewer system which could readily connect to an expanded public sewage treatment and disposal facility. P. Water Supply Vera Water & Power indicate they are willing and able to serve this proposal. Standard conditions are being recommended to assure that Water Plans are developed by the proponent and for approval by the County, Health Department, and Fire District. h All ispwal, July 42, 19&2 Q. R. U. V. Agricultural Summary The proposal ban category on the Spokane County retaining agricultural land uses in III. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SR -G18 /r SITE /VICINITY INFORHATION.(Cont) 30 PE- 1423 -82 vol " 641 'Fitt 1436 Electrical Service Power will be served by Vera Water & Power. Fire Protection Fire District No. 1 is requesting a condition to assure proper fire flow and fire hydrants prior to the preliminary plat being finalized. The Standard Water Plan condition is being recommended. S. Schools Central Valley School District No. 356 estimates that. this proposal, when developed, will produce approximately 108 students K thru 6th grade; 54 students 7th thru 9th grade; 54 students 10th thru 12th grade. They anticipate the school facilities will accommodate these new students, recognizing the proposal will be developed in phases. The District Planner recommends two pedestrian crosswalks at controlled intersections (note: County Engineering Department is planning a con- trolled intersection at 16th and Sullivan). And, also recommends side- " walks within the proposal for the safety of school children during the dark of winter days with plowed snow. T. Parks The report "Planning for Parks" (revised 1976) indi- cates that this proposal is within Shelley Lake neighborhood, which shows a proposed neighborhood park associated with a proposed elementary school northeast approximately half way between this proposal and Shelley Lake. The County Parks Department did not forward any recommendations. Cultural /Historic Resources None have been identified. • site has been designated as Subur- Comprehensive Plan which precludes favor of residential development. A. The Proposal The sponsor has submitted a redesign of his proposal which is designed to conform to the Comprehensive Plan, particularly regarding the "transition policy ". The sponsor has identified • number of goals, objectives and decision guidelines of the Plan TEXT which they feel are supportive of this proposal: Comprehensive Plan Text Introduction, Page 10 -- Transition Area Section 2, Page 3 -- G.2.1, Ob.2.1.a., D.0.2.1.1. Page 4 -- G.2.1., Ob.2.1.b., Ob.2.1.c., D.0.2.1.3. Ob.2.l.d., D.G.2.1.4. Page 12 -- G.2.5., Ob.2.5.a., Ob.2.5.b., Ob.2.5.c., D.G.2.5.3., D.0.2.5.3. Page 13 -- G.2.5., Ob.2.5.d., Ob.2.5.e. Page 14 -- G.2.6., Ob.2.6.a., D.0.2.6.1. Section 10, Page 5 -- 0.10.1., D.0.10.1.6. Page 6 -- G.10.I., Ob.10.1.d., Ob.10.1.f., D.G.10.1.7., D.G.10.1.8, D.G.10.1.9 Page 9 G.10.1., Ob.10.1.k., Ob.10.1.1., D.G.10.1.16, Ob.10.1.m., D.0.10.1.18 Page 10 -- G.10.1., Ob.10.1.o., D.0.10.1.19 Section 12, Page 2 -- G.12.1., Ob.12.1.c., Ob.12.1.f., D.0.12.1.3 Page 3 0.12.1., Ob.22.1.g. Section 22 Page 2 0.22.1., Ob.22.1.a., Ob.22.1.b., D.0.22.1.1. Page 3 G. 22.1., Ob.22.1.d., Ob.22.1.e., D.0.22.1.4. D.0.22.1.5 Page 4 -- G.22.2, Ob.22.2.a., D.G.22.2.1., Ob.22.2.c. .�kiyQ n.a $9: gypo87 July 22, 1982 I DOMPREBENSIVE PLAN (Cont) SR -G19 /r B. Map Category is SUBURBAN The easterly 40% of the proposal complies with the intent of this category regarding the level of services', aesthetics, and density. Transition Area Sullivan Road is the boundary between the URBAN:" category and the SUBURBAN category. The Comprehensive Plan has a dis - cretionary policy which allows for transition, in this case, from the - density of URBAN to the density of SUBURBAN, as determined by the Hearing Examiner Committee. The proposal site is within the SUBURBAN category and on its west boundary at Sullivan Road is URBAN; therefore, the pro- posal is in the "Transition Area ". The preliminary plat design proposes transition from 10,000 square ft. lots at the west poriton of the proposal to 1/2 acre lots and larger at the east protion of the proposal, and transition is accomplished 'midway in the proposal. D. Fill -In This project constitutes "fill -in" for both the Comprehensive Plan and the 201 Plan and an efficient use of existing and proposed public services and facilities. E. Variety of Lifestyle This proposal will provide the public with a _ 7YF choice of lot sizes ranging from URBAN to SUBURBAN (transition) and the •.: relative lifestyles associated with the different lot sizes. There are n primarily four basic lot sizes - -- 10,000 sq. ft., 12,500 sq. ft., 22,000 a, ( + -) sq. ft., and a few 1 acre lots. F. Buffering{ There is no need for buffering since the proposed land use is single- family dwellings on varying sized lots surrounded on three sides by existing single - family dwellings on varying sized lots. The proposal's design has allowed for similar sized lots on the south and east as already exist, and has proposed lots at the north with similar frontages (but without the same lot depth as exist north of 16th Avenue). No buffering to the west is needed since it exists as a cultivated field. 0. Utilities The proposal intends to have utilities in the street and all utilities will be available and /or per recommended conditions of approval. H. Sidewalks Sidewalks are to be installed along Sullivan Road and 24th Avenue per County Road standards. I. Water Quality Both storm water (or surface run off) and sewage effluent are being managed per recommended conditions of approval that comply with the Board of County Commissioners adopted policy for protect ing the aquifer. J. Waste Water Management Plan The proposal lies within the Priority Sewer Service Area, therefore, an interim sewerage treatment will be required as approved by the County Utilities Department - - -a system that complies with the policies for protection of the Spokane Valley Aquifer. K. Energy Management The proposal complies with conservation of energy by fill -in development and using existing public facilities and services. Also, over 75% of the lots in the proposal are oriented so as to aecoeo- date passive or active solar type residential units if the sponsor chooses to provide for an Energy Plan and /or design. C. 31 RNI ggpORT, July 22, 1 °82 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (Cont.) IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW V. LEAD AGENCY CONCLUSIONS /RECOMMENDATIONS SR -G20 /r L. Transportation The proposal is adjacent to existing established arterials and roadways and is recommended to be conditioned for road improvements that meet the circulation policies of the plan. M. Summary The proposal significantly conforms to policies of the Plan. A. Environmental Checklist An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and reviewed by the Planning Department Staff. No significant adverse environmental impacts were judged to exist that were not being mitigated by the proposal or mitigated by recommended conditions of approval. B. Checklist Evaluation Due to the size and location of the proposal, staff evaluated this proposed declaration for two criteria: First; Is there enough information available to make a determination of impacts? and; Second; Will the preliminary plat, as designed and proposed and as conditioned for approval, mitigate the identified impacts? It was determined that ample information is available such as the Environ- mental Impact Statements for the Comprehensive Plan, the 201 Plan, and for individual projects in the vicinity of the proposal; therefore, there is not a need for an Environmental Impact Statement to provide additional information. Regarding the mitigation of potential impacts caused by the proposal on the environment; the proposal is designed and conditioned to conform to the plans, policies, and regulations of Spokane County, therefore, the proposal would not need an Environmental Impact Statement to discuss the alternative means of mitigating said impacts. Slight adverse environmental impacts were identified on the checklist in the following categories: earth, air, water, flora, fauna, noise, light and glare, land use, material resources, population, transportation /circulation, public services, utilities, and energy. In summary, since there is ample information and the preliminary plat is mitigating its impacts by complying with plans, policies, and regulation of the County, the County Subdivision Administrator issued • "proposed" Declaration of Non - Significance, which was circulated for the required 15 days to other agencies of jurisdiction. C. Hearing Examiner Committee Decision The Hearing Examiner Committee will need to evaluate the public testimony if additional environmental information is given and evaluate the conclusion of staff to decide whether a "Final" Declaration of Non - Significance is appropriate. • A. Zoning The proposed Single - Family Residential (B - zoning for: all of the lots except the 10 lots in the northeast corner proposed for Agricultural Suburban zoning is found to be compatible with the und- ing existing zoning and appropriate for the land uses proposed. 32 PE- 1423 -82 Vat'-‘641 FA E 1438 ,, SR -G21 /r '; ' a mmumsnoNs Cot AGENCY 0 �PCLIISI0]f8 ( )'S Land Use The proposed single - family dwellings ( "stick built ") is found to be compatible with the existing single - family dwellings on all sides of the site. C. Comprehensive Plan The east 40% of the proposal is in compliance with the SUBURBAN category of the Plan. The west 60% is in "transition" from Urban density to Suburban density and will require a judgement by the Hearing Examiner Committee; if the committee finds the proposed "trap- sition design" to be appropriate for this vicinity, then the entire proposal is in compliance with the Plan's purpose and intent. D. Recommendations In considering: 1. That the site will physically accommodate the proposal as designed; 2. That the basic residential services (power, phone, water, fire protection, schools, etc.) are available and recommended to be conditions of approval; 3. That a public sewer system is possible to install and recommended to comply with the 201 Plan to protect the aquifer; 4. That the roads and streets in the vicinity are paved and are being improved to accommodate the existing and the future vehicular traffic; specifically Sullivan Road; 5. That the preliminary plat design has lot sizes or frontages that are compatible with the adjacent existing residential lots around the proposal; 6. That the purpose and intent of the plan, assuming the "transition Design" is found appropriate, is being complied with; 7. That public testimony has yet to be taken, but staff assumes all issues have been anticipated and has recommended condition of approval accordingly. Therefore, staff recommends this preliminary plat be APPROVED with the recommended conditions of approval and that a "Final" Declaration of Non - Significance be issued. VI. CONDITIONS If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. PLANNING CONDITIONS 1. That the plat be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and /or attached sheets as noted. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for three (3) years to August 1, 1985. The applicant may request a one (1) year Exten- sion of Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. Such applications should demonstrate the progress made toward finalizing this preliminary plat. If • Time ascen- sion is not requested in a timely manner or a Time Extension is not granted, then the preliminary plat approval is NULL & VOID. 33 AAA's& ..... v... , ./04./y u. SY•L VI, .CONDITIONS Cont) ( • PLANNING CONDITIONS SR -G22 /r PE- 1423 -62, Ycf . 641 4 1440 3. That phasing of the preliminary plat is required as approved by the County Subdivision Administrator. The purpose is to distribute any impact on the public roadways and public school district over a 5 or more year finalization period. NOTE: Time Extensions will be necessary, since more than 3 years are needed to finalize this preliminary plat; but Extensions are not guaranteed and additional conditions may be added by the Hearing Examiner Committee as recommended by the reviewing agencies. 4. That Time Extension approvals may be conditioned in a manner to assure the elimination of conditions which are significantly adverse to or conditions which cause serious deterioration of public health, safety or general welfare, such as traffic safety, overcrowding of school facilities and others. 5. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements unless the applicant(s) /sponsor(s) chooses to file a notarized Waiver of Notice of Action with the Spokane County Planning Department. 6. That each phase of this proposal be in substantial conformance with the preliminary plat of record as approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations, when approved by the County Subdivision Administrator, will be permitted, while variations not so approved are to be heard by the Hearing Examiner Committee as "change of conditions" in • public hearing. 7. That a name be indicated before each final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County,Aseessor and the County Subdivision Administrator. 8. That appropriate street names be indicated, and approved by the County Subdivision Administrator. 9. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat or particular phase of it, for distribution to the Planning Department, County Engineers Department, County Health District, and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 10. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), • proposed declaration of non significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding a•ae•anent of the pro- posal's adverse impacts to the physical environment; • finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of this project; sad •.final declaration of non - significance is hereby to be issued. 34 f.: "s� VI. CONDITONS (Coat) PLANNING CONDITIONS (Cont) SR - G23 /r PE 1423 -82 gr. 641 PEE 1441 I 11. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), fire protection dis- trict, and County Building & Safety Department will certify, prior to the filing of each phase of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will ade- quately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certi- fication will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water ' system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrange- ments will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. Each plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "the public water system, as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and County Building & Safety Department, and purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. -.12. That a current certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the filing of the final plat. That a statement be placed in the dedication of each final plat to the effect that: "no more than one dwelling unit be placed on any Ow lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purpsoes of creating additional lots or building sites without first filing a caplet." 14. That upon filing of each Final Plat the existing Agricultural sone class! - fication shall be changed to R -1, except Lots 35 -40 and 42 - Of Block 10 which shall be changed to Agricultural Suburban. ENGINEER CONDITIONS 1,2 That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to dedication of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the pre- liminary plat of record and as approved by the County Engineer. • That plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standard• showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of • final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of o lLeaased Professional Civil Engineer. 35 :1 'STAFF REPORT, July 22, J "q2 VI. CONDITIONS (Cont) PE- 1423 -82 ;��" ;, OFF. 64 ��. 1 FA�� 1442 ENGINEER CONDITIONS (Cont) 3. That drainage plane and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. County Health District approval is also required of the drain- age plans since drainage may effect the community drainfield sites. 4. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certi- ficate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right -of -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.' 6. All construction within the existing or proposed public right - - way is to be completed prior to filing plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumeating the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 7 That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded. A 1 -foot strip at the ends or edges of all streets that termi- nate or border each plat boundary. (Temporary cul - - sacs are required. when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) 8. A statement must appear in the dedicatory language of - each plat that: "Individual driveway access permits will be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system." 9. Dedication of 23 ft. additional right -of -way along Sullivan Road. 10. That the final plat boundary be depicted as the westerly section line of 525, T25N, R44 EWH, and that the total right dedication from that line be shown as 43 feet. 11. A statement shall be placed in each plat dedication that: "MO direct access be allowed from residential lots to Sullivan Road ". 12. Existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and /or curbed to the Spokane County Standards. 13. That all public roads within each Final Plat he designed sad eesetencted to Spokane County Standards: That sidewalks are required along the arterial(s) oa Sa11ivY had sad 14tb Avssae. 3p, 36 ti. IJ •VI "CONDITIONS (Cont) • ENGINEER CONDITIONS - .Coot) 15. That Public Road Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section be: Section Number 2 for 16th Avenue with Minimum Paving width being the Access Standard, Section Number 2 for other public roads within the preliminary plat with Minimum Paving width being the Access Standard; and Section Number 2 for 24th Avenue with Minimum Paving width being. the Collector Standard. ai 641 Firi 14 16. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane, County Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended,• which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees in new construction. 17. That Sullivan Road be improved to the TYPICAL Roadway Cross Section designed by the Spokane County Engineer for the Sullivan Road Project CRP 1679. These improvements shall be made on the east half of Sullivan Road along the westerly plat boundary. • 18. That the intersection of 20th Avenue as proposed shall be located so that it is compatible with the location of the entrances to the proposed Central Valley Educational Services complex. This shall be coordinated through the office of the County Engineer. UTILITY CONDITIONS 1. The owner, his heirs and successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as mended." Each plat dedication is to include this statement. .; Amy rates service for this project shall be provided in accordance with eha Water System Plan for Spokane County. iatesia public sewer system is required. Plans and specifications for "` qp latssia system and the future connection to the Valley Intercept 111411 M reviewed and approved by the County Utilities Director prior to the final plat. COaaias surface meter and sewers disposal detailed plea shall be by the County Easiness end the Health District prior to any finalised and the issuance of any Dsildias,paailt log this eaten shell be by an existing public rater seppWelies approved Y�l daal'Sneer (Spokane), State Dap•;trat ot; Mai 1 10110ilth ff , STAFF REPORT, July 22, 1982 coNDIT1oNs (Cont) HEALTH CONDITIONS (Cont) SR-G26/r '•]!ARA PE-1423-82 ' L Ur. 641 rgzE1444 VO. 38 - j1. 3. Prior to filing of any final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system • , proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall 1 , r ; state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 4. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently pro.... hibited. It:131*-r1 • , 4 „. .;;. 4 ..if • 1- :,. .•'; <,„ ;'-''' ;4 ;41- ..r, •-,, . ...t.:, ..1. • • 4 'I' 14 ' Ic ,.•I • .. , r. - 31:59 -'?• 4 , •• ,, , 5., ' ,c,L• 4,1;4! -4, ' ;I .,$;:lir''‘':t!&•:11.,titil):.;t1:11:1: t:I: c•V'' s „ :.) ,: , ;44 , : i.k , 1,;,. • 1;1 • I!'‘'' - *"••• 4 40 44, t ? I ' •''‘',C ' .4 . • A*- . . . j „ ,.. '' •.:. r t :: . . . ..'-'). „1: • tIN fi e• •11.4e 1. •„',..., ;,.. r, , . •. .fr LI ,4ria:* '''' rl'HI '? .,:., - -i . tik At .... siw) - .4- . , 2 Subdivision Hearing 4 Examiner Committee Action - July, 22, 1982 8. PE- 1423 -82; ZE -32 -8 SPONSOR: AG2 -E4 /r ACTION: LOCATION: COMPREHENSI PROPOSAL: RIDGEMONT ESTATES No. 4 AGRICULTURAL to R -1 928 -1991 SURVEYOR /ENGINEER: 534 -1410 Sullivan South Enterprieses Inland Pacific Engineering E. 12929 Sprague Avenue S. 25 Altamont Street Spokane, WA 99216 Spokane, WA 99202 The proposal is located adjacent and bound by 16th Avenue, Sullivan Road and 24th Avenue. VE PLAN: SUBURBAN (Sullivan Road is "transition" between URBAN and SUBURBAN.) The sponsor proposes to divide 125 acres into 284 single - family residential lots; lot sizes ranging from 10,000 sq.ft. up to 1/2 acre lots. The existing Agriculutral zone is proposed to be changed to R -1. (Note: this proposal includes a 7/23/72 redesign of the preliminary plat which excludes the Surface Drainage Retention Pond from the preliminary plat.) A new legal description dated July 26, 1982 has been submitted for this application. Approval - Unanimous Note: Additional public testimony was taken on changes to the application. All time extensions were granted for three (3) years to conform to Washington State Subdivision law as changed July 1981. The above action is SUMMARIZED. The detailed information, public record, findings of fact, decision, and conditions are available for public review at the Spokane County Planning Department. 17c cge//SE ii.) / Lois 4r o.ve XeT /✓ C7 ' o ' - Seecs / jtl� � tic��J - - -- Pi`As r m £ aeier 7 S6'42e12— 706/CL /Zog4 2/.2/ 6 e Weve 0.4 % /CCtt55 aides / ,4c/2. a f/ " w/!/ AAae eirzcu /a-,e 7 4075 Ecees with 2eciesfc) xilr 1 f /fate - /U /ono 5r ,-n 5 _ Sure 3 00 - 97 — Scti neZJ %s c -a°c;nza -te .� S . 2%7 S_ - 57F/0-- l/eiz4 a.. t !ti_/ 7 7re/a wrft acct rza-- c • Cmzc4Rrn-4- w Sewes d rx • Rc mzia- Fuxci cc/5 50V /'y G- - Fp u 2 GUS/ 5775 of 5 t �.S ( T ie .tea a 2 th,( L-/ K' / t eNA) Pert/ 22 19 J. up; tl ;awl s i F. Te,u,o ;.c AA) , i c{ce %Apia -C PE /V - utt _ um e - N \ 2 0 5 -evt s Suite 300 9 rzot Re? fLeset,a5 aiusoz - Co.viceir& ,'7A/24t7 PeAritaye, tt tt igiNtactadt, otaC. te-kker 0,)\--`ttt eAtt inJ oFposit'+oo - eaN_cevzuki Ica ZON - 1,0 q co.aTro l c*) /o Aue (7 (a) Does s►.to ht ooctaT %ho6UQ tkome5 Tuppe has submi &eJ lt - • (1..) k•-.0 LAS 4 ua( ;rt - - io - - 2 � r rsise - pesos, tie_ C ecJr;ty o-1 ro ect — 4 79 000 hevffes. (c) t' o✓t 'n NCI r ccJi }t+- r¢Q_c7_ to c l✓eerfak o(a v u Q - i� but/to-14A t o - cl o-c n �sfrernin CO Dr 0.- n c e L9--e — �Jt v„Ge� — QS t— " "'v`� r, iVo A' c-( rPe e -` / f eie7� AR �t wet 6C CEO Sewers - acme, ce Nr ee:CL Vibot,t ' T"ra- nsc'rto-n. Cram ''// � ,. Pcv'ycsecQ 5 ys%ent UA / /?�_Jre_cv e; 11 0,12Ct n Qt cw, 5c t Sys- , w/ c6 pp rlJ s Tes taraoYI RnQct.&u tz— cytza _.vmatt..) zn+_ 4LP� c`� a . ,�� _ r - ?z R °ccJ 0.i.QJ - /t / ,3r vA7& eami eash,'2S _CUe2t-_es to ccrnT re / ace ' o -I atc1t• -vc R ok Qtr. catt bec twee A1 'trsA cis s - - -- Zoo& cea ..lo7g (moo pp too Peoblevn 5 6" kJ. j V iJM1 - gyp cre of eit 2 ,ZA�eS. nlo 0Th- n �- a Y X15 -7r�j4 c 1/Q /u %JCaG/? ce__ -- --�k�� Cade ,d -a — =r x4 Cezte,ti cnc aw - Wo c i " ±-#3 u-Q -1/4=v - OU?2eRyfkeiTtf 6i - t - ct a`CtcM —on L«1 Cosn -J. a. .a ®rcl,eir i Ramona et ck E /sgcq{ /V _ — k-YQ I STra- sa (1Q_7 S 7z z �. k - - t -F- t o n3 R€40,5o r-' cze- kyaun 5 VrcDa 5ccQ to (L ifi - �_d F__ & CrrowT • li,) ._C rate ; — Canc•erk3 S Coy @ _- - r' - -c { s e � c �4 tzo l A - C e-T-ti v Q, U -÷ tiiio 4 Pewit; et, 5; ,17 or► &43/7 /b Th - Does .oaf Fee\ 11A I:\t T(ner& h/Is bee •erc.g7 Quein 4'; LO ie Gt' %y', /�/ -e et'�Y\s r i� E S . Q 7- Wor / bac l�'� = ai Getat .,[ C.4) a- o /. - — - --g , -4..) • /ex-- o» 72. 92r D rou-i , 1_s .- - ! �r_1_ d _F (_.A_. /TI — i 5, D• 2; Iem,v 6 /3/ 9 77/77JBr //.[,jje_ _- rs,ree w; 71/ - TD Acc� t' 1.31-3- Acre C-€ 1 doe s —� 6N? 30 (.5ae be a_ -rice- tratrs ;t Lo '0 43 &s utidc 3 171A-Q-- 14 c 't--40 , Sc A/a ie -e_ o 1v r -A5 Luna p to,„_, ay) 5Tov, 5/ 8- / Z Oeleitres (( - CI tTicA Pits 0-c WS Mete o+ prop erTy peets _I: Lots Fro ov_■ 2-4 rh eaa< - _01.) -'. Th-� rr ys #\CC.ems t n C� 19 RoRd inn 10 urc _F.42> c9 AD r a. N d PraJl ) `— O zc & — 2o--4 huh -Od .J -s�n. 6 1 -+^ , r ., av4 t o a . P 9 iv d r s s. Pon. & —i u Rc. wi rk � oiniy r:s ©v ' modk {_;_c a' aV r"I /76)ceri c e — GUi / '.vTe�Z 1QCCes �ra�_��e_�!1)S_, aoe_s c c i n * [its - crcr r tc : L a?� �% %L� � r� C?�«1I1 —dEa . o k 1u t r2 t2 S d3.4G (/? 02r-s7 -- C a 1„vt, C4 r & ca tts-„es_cru; f Gu4) t-e pecrcL) d � , 0( 71 are • — his r . � j ro7c �L!� � r _ZoorLt)_e _ Lt). --fie 4( 7 — ate. -tee 4 o_ tat-?,t - 4- ,4c2 'n, - -c. . tc c,QQ t P otid Rte, — e —to tire- 04Z 5 i<C tJ 1Je da — Y Our I akAti-Q, c +) Oh. Drat.►%► � rokt 9(3 .�M. (e i44-7 A CC rs5 a z 5. Left / itY,v - Karat yc ..t. 11.11 SPO.ANC COUN,Y COURTHOUSE TO: Spokane County Planning Department FROM: Bob McCann, Plat Inspector DATE: July 23, 1982 RE: PE 1423, Ridgemont Estates 84 Revised 0 F FI (3 OF COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER Svona o ,'asnnvozov 99260 The County Engineer's Department has reviewed the above - referenced preliminary plat. The revisions as proposed appear to satisfy the concerns which were expressed at the public hearing of July 22, 1982. As proposed, Lots 1 through 6, Block 1, will have direct access to 24th Avenue. Road grades in this section of 24th Avenue are very flat. The transition in the terrain and road grade between Sandra Drive and Timberlane Drive and the associated adequate sight distance will permit safe access to 24th Avenue. The circular drives as proposed by the sponsor will enhance ingress to and egress from these parcels. The County Engineer is requesting that access to Lot 7, Block 1, be from the proposed Timberlane Drive and that access to 24th from this parcel be prohibited. All of the lots in Block 10 will have interior frontage and will not access 24th. Access to 24th Avenue from Lot 1 of Block 10 should be prohibited. 16th Avenue functions as a local access street. It is presently 30 feet in width and serves Rotchford Acre Tracts as well as a'number of segregated parcels to the east. Typical Roadway Section Number 2 has been designated by the County Engineer. The applicant will be responsible for the construction of additional roadway (approximately 6 feet) and curbing along the north boundary of the plat fronting on 16th. This addition will then make 16th Avenue a total of 36 feet wide. Because of the close proximity of this proposal to Central Valley High School, the County Engineer is recommending that sidewalks be required along 16th Avenue. This will mitigate potential vehicular pedestrian conflicts along that roadway. The proposed lot line revision for Lots 33 through 45, Block 10, and the exclusion of the Stormwater Retention Pond from the plan appears to create a land use situation which will contribute to the perpetuation of the Retention Pond site. It is recommended that an ingress and egress Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3600; Planning Department July 23, 1982 Page Two easement be provided across Lot 45, Block 10. This will assure future access to the pond for maintenance and upkeep. BM acw Recommended additions to Engineering conditions: 1120 in Addendum to Staff Report of July 22, 1982, becomes 1119. 1120 - No direct access to 24th Avenue from Block 10 as shown on Revised Preliminary Plat of record. 1121 - Access to 24th Avenue from Lot 7, Block 1, is prohibited. 1122 - That sidewalks are required along 16th Avenue adjacent to the plat. 1123 - That a 60 ft. wide easement for ingress and egress to the retention pond shall be provided across Lot 45, Block 10. The location of this easement shall be approved by the County Engineer prior to filing of the plat. wi95 eArreete arta at PubUc 1-{enrin, i- za -g2, see C Mta;tIoV 5 ?r,oP 65E4 Other drainage easements, access easements, and drainage facilities affecting this property should be shown on the Final Plat. V. LEAD AGENCY CONCLUSIONS /RECOPIMENDATIONS A. Zoning - The proposal Agricultural Suburban zone reclassification for the 10 lots in the northeast corner of the proposal is not compatible with the existing Storm Drainage Retention Pond and its operation and maintenance agreement and is not appropriate since lots 34 thru 45 of Block 10 are recommended to he redesigned to 1/2 acre lots sizes which will not allow large animal keeping on less than 1 acre. ADDENDUM TO STAFF REPORT July 22, 1982 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF RE: PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE- 1423 -82, RIDGEMONT ESTATES No. 4 ZE -32 -82 AGRICULTURAL to R -1 and AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN II. SITE /VICINITY INFORMATION N. Drainage Plan The County Engineering Department is recommending the preliminary plat be conditioned to preclude the creation of multiple ownership across the existing Storm Drainage Retention Pond. An operation and maintenance agreement does exist between Spokane County and the developer of existing subdivisions above this proposal on the "Ridgemont Bluff ". The keeping of large animals on the Retention Pond grassy area, as would be allowed with Agricultural Suburban zoning, would impede the percolation of the surface run -off water. Hooved animals will compact the soil and cause a "mud ". seal. In addition the County Engineering Department is of the opinion that it is not feasible to operate this drainage facility through ten different lot owners. The facility must continue operation as a single, undivided ownership per existing operation and maintenance agreements. The County Planning Staff recommends that lots 35 thru 45 of Block 10 be redesigned to 1/2 acre lots as approved by the County Engineering Depart- ment and County Subdivision Administrator to eliminate the potential operation and maintenance problems and multiple ownerships of this exist- ing surface Drainage Rentention Pond. Also, that the preliminary plat be conditioned to change the zoning to these 10 lots to R -1 zoning instead of the requested Agricultural Suburban zoning, since the keeping of large animals are not allowed on less than one acre lots in the Agricultural Suburban zone. SR -J1 /r D. Recommendations In considering: 8. That the preliminary plat lots 34 thru 45 of Block 10 will be re- designed to 1/2 acre ,lots in a manner to exclude the existing Retention Pond boundary. ADDENDUM TO STAFF REPORT, July 22, 1982 PE- 1423 -82 V. LEAD AGENCY CONCLUSIONS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Cont) D. Recommendations (Cont) VI. CONDITIONS SR -J2 /r That the proposal is required to be phased to mitigate impacts on the public facilities and services (such as roadways and schools). If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. PLANNING CONDITIONS 9. (Re- worded) That appropriate utility and drainage easements be in- dicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat or particular phase of it, for distribution to the Planning Department, County Engineers Depart- ment, County Health District, and the utility companies. Written approv- al of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 14. (Re- worded) That upoh filing of each,Final Plat the existing Agricul- tural zone classification shall be changed to R-1. 15. That lots 34 thru 45 of Block 10 of the Preliminary Plat be redesigned to 1/2 acre lots in a manner to preclude multiple ownerships of the existing Storm Drainage Retention Pond and the design he approved by the County Engineering Department and County Subdivision Administrator prior to finalizing this portion of the preliminary plat. ENGINEER CONDITIONS 19. That the existing Storm Drainage Retention Pond he shown as a non - buildable and separate lot from lots 34 thru 45 of Block 10. V ` That the County Engineering Department shall review and approve, per the `_ existing operation and maintenance agreement, any and all Final Plat designs and Plat dedication to assure the continued operation and maintenance of drainage facilities affecting the proposed plat. Thanks for your attention. (4..44 -11.2-r John Nunnery Subdivision Administrator JN /bkr Enclosure PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEEFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 SPOKANE COUNTY COURTHOUSE July 2, 1982 RE: Declaration of Non - significance for PE- 1423 -82 RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO. 4 Please consider, carefully, this environmental checklist and our declaration (note the attached memo from Mr. Davis dated June 30, 1982). This proposal is 139 acres to be subdivided into 285 single- family residential lots. " " tom_. ::4.: . CMECEi MAN CBtmpT1 im.iheta Jo_ 5 'fl?2 ilm- Bo APPLICATION #: PE -142' ? RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO. ZONE CLASSIFICATION: AGRICULTURAL to R -1 and AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN PROPOSED/FI NAL SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M I N A T I O N I. Proponent: Sullivan South Enterprises Contact Person: Kenneth Tupper Phone: 928 -1991 2. County Action(s) Requested: Zone Change X Preliminary Short Plat Approval X ; 3. Description of Proposal: Divide 139 acres into 285 single - family residential lots. 4 Location of Proposal: Section: 25 Township: 25 Range: 44 Aquifer Sensitive Area Yes; General Sewer Service Area Yes; Priority Sewer Service Area Yes. This proposal is generally located in the Spokane valley, adjacent and bound by 16th Avenue, Sullivan Road, and 24th Avenue. 5. To: WA State Department of Ecology. WA State Dept. of Social & Health Services Spokane County Health District Central Valley School District Fire District #1 Vera Irrigation No. 15 County Engineer's Department .& 208 Study Spokane County Parks & Recreation Spokane County Chief Civil Deputy Spokane County Sheriff's Office Spokane County Utilities Department 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON The Spokane County Planning Department has determined SPOKANE COUNTY to be LEAD AGENCY, pursuant to WAC 197 -10 -220. 7. Threshold Determination: This proposal has been determined to not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. Review and Comment: If you wish to comment in writing as provided in WAC 197 -10 -340 (5), please respond before the due date in light of the following information, noting particularly the due date for written comments: *********************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Declaration of Nonsignificance issued: July 2, 1982 Written response accepted until: July 17, 1982 A public hearing is scheduled for: July 22, 1982 *********************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Contact: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456 -2205 ATTN: John Nunnery PROPOSED DECLARATION: Name: John N nery Name: Signature: V41 Title: Subdivision Administrat.r Dept: Spokane County Planning Dept. Date: July 2, 1982 DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE FINAL DECLARATION: Signature: Title: Dept: Date: OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNT Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT i +,n. To John Nunnery, Subdivision Administrator From Tom Davis, Programs Administrates I Subject Review of Environmental Checklist for PE- 1423 -82 "Ridgemont Estates #4" Date June 30 , 19 82 In response to your memo dated May 13, 1982 and after reviewing the expanded environmental checklist submitted by the applicant on June 28, 1982, it is my conclusion that a Threshold Determination of Non - Significance may be recommended to the Hearing Examiner Committee for the proposed project. In accordance with WAC 197 -10 -320, the Planning Department as .lead agency is responsible for the initial review of the environmental checklist. Section 320 states: "The lead agency shall conduct an initial review of the environmental checklist to- . gether with any supporting documentation. This initial review shall be made without requiring further information from the applicant" (emphasis added) In making this initial review, WAC 197 -10 -330 provides that supporting documents which are found to be reasonably sufficient to determine the environmental im- pact of a proposal are to be used. These documents are: 1) Spokane 201 Wastewater Facilities Plan 2) Spokane Aquife r Water Quality Management Plan (208 Study) 3) Establishment of the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary 4) Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan - 1980 5) Spokane County Zoning Ordinance 6) Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance 7) Draft Environmental Impact Statement - 1980 Comprehensive Land Use Plan 8) Draft Environmental Impact Statement - Educational Service Center, Central Valley School District, November 1981 With the exception of the two EIS's cited, the above plans and ordinances re- present the County's official'plans, policies, and regulations dealing with land use developments. Many of the requirements contained therein are designed to mitigate adverse effects- to the environment and to the public health, safety and general welfare. Therefore, upon finding that the project is in compliance with these plans and policies or conditioned to assure compliance, potential adverse effects to the environment can be mitigated. Unless additional information is presented either by other agencies having public responsibilities or by public testimony to the Hearing Examiner Committee which would result in the need for further studies, a final declaration of non- significance may be entered by the Hearing Examiner Committee. The sensitive nature of this proposal due to the density, circulation and overall impacts to the environment addressed through the expanded portions of the checklist should be made apparent to other agencies of jurisdiction to insure that any comments those agencies may wish to make are brought forward for consideration by the Hearing Examiner Committee. cc. Wallis Hubbard, Director -2- JUN 281982 SPOKANE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLI ST PLANNING DEPARTMENT FILE #: PE a / B Z SEC /TWN /RNG: 25 -25 -44 EMI Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely ", as per WAC 197 -10) affecting the quality of the physical environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. ,.U,.x[ COW,. Cpu „.CY,[ lunar aGO C UUEf Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes” or "maybe" if, in your opinion, . even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the degree of impact, asking you for more information, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision - makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages, if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnec- essary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for every "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required to provide explanation for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Sullivan South Enterprises Phone Number: 923 -1991 2. Address of proponent: E. 12929 Sprague, Spokane, Washington 9921E 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Spokane County 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: Ridgentont Estates No. 4 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): The proposal is an 139 acre subdivision to create 285 lots for single family residences with a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. / l Q. - !')� 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the Proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): See Attachment 8. Estimated Date for Completion of Proposal: 1933 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state, and local - including rezones) Preliminary plat approvalfinap . l lat approval. Health Dept. Septic Tank and Drainfield Permit approval 10a. Do you, or the owner in the event you do not own the subject land, have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No. August, 1981 lob. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's location? If yes, explain: No. 11. Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: No. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Preliminary plat application II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil ?. . . , x _ (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or X physical features? (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion or soils, either on or off the site ? X (f) Changes in deposition of erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosionwhichmay modify the channel, of a river or stream x or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: Construction of single family residences may cause some toponraphical changes and will cause disruptions, displacements, compaction and overcoverinq of soils. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? x (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in.any water hody? (e) Discharge into surface water, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria,\or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? 2 Yes Maybe No X Yes Maybe No x X X x Explanation: Construction of single family residences will require covering of soils with impervious surfaces thereby altering absorption rates & surface water runoff. New recidentc will require puhlir water The cite nverliec the Spokane- Rathdrum a ui- 1 r. 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora, and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered . species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? x Explanation: Construction of residences will cause a reduction in the number and diversity of native species. New species will be introduced for use in landscaping and gardens. residential use will increase noise levels. Explanation: See attachment construction. 3 x x 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or number of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna? X (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? X Explanation: The site is currently in agricultural use and is a habitat for a variety of wildlife. Increases in species associated with domestic dwellings will compete with current resident species. x 6. Noise. Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? x Explanation: Increased automobile traffic and other activity associated with 7. Light and Glare. Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: No sources of light currently exist on the site. New residences will be a source of light and glare. 8. Land Use. Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? x 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X Explanation: Fossil fuels will be consumed by the project for heating and trans- portation requirements. Wood, gravel and other resources will be used in n 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions' Explanation: Yes Maybe No 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, Yes Maybe No or growth rate of the human population of an area? X Explanation: The proposal will result in an increase in 850 to 1,050 peupl in the area. 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for Yes Maybe No additional housing's X Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? x • Explanation: See attachments. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: .(a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities' (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X (f) Other governmental. services? Yes Maybe N X Explanation: The proposal will increase the demand for all public services and may result in the need for some new public facilities such as roads and schools. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy' Yes Maybe No x x x x Explanation: The proposal will create 285 single family residences which will create an on -going demand upon existing sources of energy. The need for development of new sources of energy will not result from the proposal. 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems. Yes Maybe No or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? X (b) Communication systems? X (c) Water's x (d) Sewer or septic tanks' x (e) Storm Water drainage? X (f) Solid waste and disposal? X Explanation: See attachment. Yes Maybe No 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazards or potential health hazard (including mental health)? x Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Explanation: Yes Maybe No 19. Recreation: Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? x Explanation: Yes Maybe No 20. Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building Explanation: . III. SIGNATURE Date: Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: Y'e &�4,<sa4 t >t1 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Based o this staff review of the enviro checklist and ot pertiment information,' the staff: A. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recommends /issues a proposed declaration of nonsignificance. 8. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommends /issues a final declaration of significance. C. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recommends /issues a final declaration of nonsignificance. Revised: August, 1981 I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any will- ful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may with- draw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist. Phone: —\ (;\ 6 \` 5 Yes Maybe No Proponent: S \ \\ V‘-- - - --, (Please Print or Type) I P roponent: 'C Address: Person completing form: Tim Lawhead Phone: 535 -1410 ' Date: x I. BACKGROUND ATTACHMENT 7. The proposed site is an 139 acre parcel located east of the City of Spokane , in the Spokane Valley and south of Sprague Avenue. The site is bounded on the north by 16th Avenue, the south by 24th Avenue and the west by Sullivan Road. Adjacent to the eastern boundary lies the Ridgemont Estates and Ridgemont Estates No. 2 subdivisions. Both of these subdi- visions are developed with conventional single family dwellings. West of the site across Sullivan Road is the site of the proposed Central Valley School District Educational Services Center. Large lot residential property is located to the north .while residential property to the south and east is urban density. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 8. Land Use The site of the .proposed project is an undeveloped parcel currently in agricultural use. The site is bounded on the north by 16th Avenue, the south by 24th Avenue and the west by Sullivan Road. Land uses to the north of the site are primarily residential in character. They range from mini- farm tracts of one acre or larger to duplexes. Considerable new subdivision . activity with urban density single fancily development has taken place in the past few years (refer to attached land use map). One such single family subdivision has been developed on the north side of 16th Avenue west of Sullivan Road. Urban density single family development also exists east and south of the site. Land west of Sullivan Road, opposite the proposed site, is presently under cultivation. This is the proposed site for the Central Valley School Dis- trict's Educational Service Center. The proposed project will provide a transition from urban designation west of Sullivan Road to Suburban designation on the project site. The gross density of the proposed project is 2.1 units per acre with the primary transi- . tion occurring from west to east. Typical lot sizes are 10,000 square feet minimum within a corridor along Sullivan Road; 12,500 square feet minimum within a central corridor; and one -half acre minimum lots up to 1.5 acre lots within the eastern portion of the project. Also, lots proposed along the south side of 16th Avenue and along the north side of 24th have similar features to existing lots on the north side of 16th Avenue and south side of 24th Avenue, respectively. The proposed project will change the land use of the site from agricul- ture to single family residential.. Potential adverse land use impacts will - be mitigated by establishment of an orderly development pattern and project phasing. Zoning The proposed project site is presently zoned Agricultural (A) (refer to the attached zoning map). Land east and.south of the site is zoned Single Family Residential (R1). Property west of Sullivan Road opposite the proposed site is zoned Agricultural (A). A portion of this property is the site of the proposed Central Valley School District Educational Services Center. Construction of the Center may require a zone change to either Commercial or Restricted Industrial. Land lying directly north of the site is zoned Agricultural Suburban (AS). The Comprehensive Plan for Spokane County designates the project site as Suburban (refer to the attached Comprehensive Plan map). However, the zoning for the project is proposed to be R -1 to accommodate the transitional features of the project. In general terms, the westerly portion of the pro- ject contains 10,000 square foot lots and requires R -1 zoning while the easterly portion of_ the project has one -half acre or larger lots and is in compliance witFi'�re com '`u P � q rements of suburban •z q nl-n 9 .- The gross density of the proposed project is 2.1 lots per acre. Car,a405- p TT 13. Transportation/Circulation fk ASS — Resid6yices = 2//5, b The addition of 850 -1,050 new residents will generate additional vehi- cular traffic on roads adjacent to the proposal. This addition to current traffic densities will increase traffic hazards in the area. Most, if not all, of the increased traffic hazards will be mitigated by the County's planned improvement of Sullivan Road, a major north -south arterial adjacent to the project site. Depending upon right of way acquisition, the County plans to upgrade Sullivan Road north of 16th Avenue to Sprague Avenue to four lanes in 1983. Construction on the proposed project is not expected before 1983. 16. Utilities (a.- b. -c.) The project will require the extension of phones, power and water systems by Vera Power and Water and Pacific Northwest Bell, all of . which currently exist immediately adjacent to the site along Sullivan Road. Natural gas is supplied to the area by Washington Water Power. The nearest natural gas line to the site extends south along Progress Road to 20th Avenue. (d.) The proposal will require individual septic tanks and drainfields for each of the 285 lots. Dry sewer lines will be installed to facilitate hook -up to a sewer system. A new sewer trunk line is planned for construc- tion along the Milwaukee Railroad right of way located approximately one mile north of the proposed site by Spring of 1985. ULID formation prior to 1985 would allow sewer connection at that time, thereby mitigating impacts from septic tanks upon the aquifer. (e.) Construction of the proposed project will alter the runoff and absorption characteristics of the site. Although the stormwater system for the proposed project has not been designed at this time, it will follow the guidelines and meet the requirements of Spokane County's "Guidelines for Storm Water Management" (f.) 285 new residences will increase the demand for solid waste disposal services. Solid waste collection and disposal services will be provided by the Valley Garbage Service. Solid waste will be disposed of at the Mica landfill. Projected life of the landfill is 10 years. Early and close coordination by the proponents of the project with suppliers of utilities will facilitate their equipment planning and programming. 1 p COMMER QIIAL ! Spr 4 0uo Ave ! .11.. I ; i 11 1 � to. faiaaatahlidtaV ktbodseXtr,v41-tvi !Nwoligtolvella URBAN b 11 (3th • c 131h R ci! 1 i ntt i , _Avo or , I .! .1 i ----- EVER() R EE1•1;!; ! ! i 15th Ave 1 co r- ll h E: f I . g , ; j , 16th Avo H ,Avo • i------------;-.4) !Ism /z r ,- `‘ aii, i -, E ir ?1st Ave < , o , ___-- 1 U RBAN 22 ""v° ' ! I ) 111 • I 71t) ADAmd , 0 1 Ott: 1 Elam ' • ‘11. th I 1 I 0 ••■ . -.1 loth ;1' J L. 10th 1 c: 7) r 0 L. ita ‘t(i 1: (-)1 t L 121t1 fl AvuJ AN .» 0: SUBURBAN ! 2 I • ...2 14!h Avo Ih I 241h Avo illaWanfiattfl c ; • Mayfield CENTRAL VALLEY HIGH scnooL J 1 1 t h Ave ' 5' 65 IL. •// 1 • O. / 4.1• 1 et th /I Q 2 ALIO I, SITE SUBURB Generalized Comprehensive Plan (1980) ::in'acjue Ave COMMERCIAL -■ SUBURBAN /-* ! (En . 1) c 114 . 2 : :) Shelley Lake 0 1 lino cr=d2='24==r1== A 9th 1 U , 1 AS DAM; Elam 1:1 Ave A S R2 ' p 1 1 71h A Sprague Ave • I A • 10th I A `, VEROREEN:43. A r- Jr J 22 A i R 1 LEGEND A - Agricultural A8 - Agricultural Suburban C - Commercial LB - Local Boataeu MF8 - Multiple Family Suburban R1 - Single Family Residential R2 - Two Family Resid•ntlal RI - R utricted iadastria! M2 - Mining M ; A i A 2lth Avo Zoning R C RII I 1 �;: Pr;gl n AV Play(lald CENTRAL VALLEY • NIGH SCHOOL 1 1 A S[j L J RI �.... ... Lahe A A Shelle v LB A ;'1112:tilf.., ;112;1 .. • ,D1 " .1111111111111111 „,,, (';'::.; ; :' ; 6 ---- Ave 7, 1t i 10 c...1 l' _A [ _ ; • 1:-.J . ... r • 1 --, • ...... . .. l',•;/'ie'.,-;::;:: ',.:"..•;-?;', .:',/,');''';''''''.',17 1 gars 1 Filth] I ?_I •- F----r---__, J -.I. 1: , - 77 7 F p • -;,--- , Av :>,-,-.. ..-!Ivo• (-7_-. .- ..- ,..„ ..../...,, l'..7, ___ ____ _ 1 :1 1 __ I , 151b I U VERGREEN ' 15th Aro I • L 1 i ":?-', :-":" '11qh AvQ: . 11 . / . / . /J(CC" H44 1 • 1 16th Av J • •• - I Generalized Land Use , t1th Me • . .... LEGEND Urban Dewitt)! Rooidential Largo Acreage Residential Commercial U22 Public/Quasi-Public mitin Shelley (/ Leke Light Induatrial Vacant, Undeveloped and/or ?nature or Agricultural Va., TO: FROM: RE: SR -J1 /r July 27, 1982 ADDENDUM TO STAFF REPORT July 22, 1982 SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE- 1423 -82, RIDGEMONT ESTATES No. 4 ZE -32 -82 AGRICULTURAL to R -1 NOTE: Due to testimony presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee at 'the July 22, 1982 public hearing, the }fearing Examiner Committee unanimously .moved to refer the application back to the Spokane County Planning Department Staff to work with the sponsor and the public regarding the: 1. Driveway ingress and egress of lots along 24th Avenue (as a redesign); 2. Surface Drainage Retention Pond operation and maintenance (as a redesign); 3. 16th Avenue improvement standards; and 4. Phasing of the development. Therefore, the July 22, 1982 STAFF REPORT has been amended per this July 27, 1982 ADDENDUM and that these amendments represent the results of a meeting Friday, July 23, 1982 with the sponsors, Ken Tupper and Jerry Niel; their agent, Dwight Hume; their surveyor, Pat Moore; Spokane County Engineering Staff, Gary Nelson and Bob McCann; Spokane County Utilities, Jim Legat; and the Spokane County Subdivision Administrator. The July 22, 1982 ADDENDUM is hereby withdrawn and not considered part of the staff recommendations, but remains as public record to the July 22, 1982 Hearing. I. GENERAL INFORMATION C. PROPOSAL Per the 7/23/82 Revised Preliminary Plat, the sponsor proposes to divide 125 acres into 284 single - family residential lots; lot sizes ranging from 10,000 square feet up to 1/2 acre lots. The existing Agricultural zone is proposed to be changed to R -1. (Note: this proposal includes a redesign of the preliminary plat which excludes the Surface Drainage Retention Pond from the preliminary plat.) A new legal descrip- tion dated July 26, 1982 has been submitted for this application. II SITE /VICINITY INFORMATION E. Proposed Zoning Propose to change the existing Agricultural zoning to R -1. (Note: The request for Agricultural Suburban zone reclassification has been withdrawn. 1 July 27, 1982, ADDENDUM PE- 1423 -82 STAFF REPORT - July 22, 1982 II. SITE /VICINITY INFORMATION (Cont) H. Proposed Lot Sizes Lot size range from 10,000 square feet to 1/2 acre as shown on the 7/23/82 Revised Preliminary Plat of Record. SR-J2 /r I. Number of Lots 284 single- family residential lots. 1 J Density The overall or average gross density is 19,172 square foot lot size (number of lots divided into the total acreage- - -125 acres' divided by 284 = .44 acres /lot. The overall or average net density is 17,254 square foot lot size (number of lots divided into the total acreage minus 10% for roads -- -125 acres minus 12.5 .acres for roads divided by 284 = .40 acres /lot). K. Design of Proposal Additionally, the 7/23/82 Revised Preliminary Plat has been designed with two cul -de -sacs to prevent direct lot access onto that portion of 24th Avenue with a grade. The sponsor proposes restrictive convenants to require circle- driveways on Lots 1 thru 6 o Block 1. L. Development Timing Additionally, the sponsor indicates that phasing of the project will be contiguous, each phase to the other, and the loca- tion of the first phase will depend on the type interim public sewer system,approved by the Spokane County Utilities Department and the ability to construct a portion of the approved roadways with this sewer system design. This will allow the remaining undeveloped portion of the pre- liminary plat to be cultivated or grazed, thereby continued management of this land. • M. Circulation Additionally, the County Engineer's Department has reviewed the above- referenced preliminary plat. The : revisions as pro- posed appear to satisfy the concerns which were expressed at the public hearing of July 22, 1982. As proposed, Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1, will have direct access to 24th Avenue. Road grades id this section of 24th Avenue are very flat. The transition in the terrain and road grade between Sandra Drive and Timber - land Drive and the associated adequate sight distance will permit safe access to 24th Avenue. The circular drives as proposed by the sponsor will enhance ingress to and egress from these. lots. The County Engineer is requesting that access to Lot 7, Block 1, be from the proposed Timber - lane Drive and that access to 24th from this lot be prohibited. All of the lots in Block 10 will have interior frontage and will not access 24th Avenue. Access to 24th Avenue from Lot 1 of Block 10 should be prohibited, as recommended. 16th Avenue functions as a local access street. It is presently 30 feet in width and serves Rotchford Acre Tracts as well as a number of segre- gated parcels to the east. Typical Roadway Section Number 2.has been designated by the Couhty Engineer. The applicant will he responsible for the construction of additional roadway (approximately 6.feet) and curbing along the north boundary of the plat fronting on 16th. This addition will then make 16th Avenue a total of 36 feet wide. 2 July 27, 1982, ADDENDUM PE- 1423 -82 STAFF REPORT - July 22, 1982 II. SITE /VICINITY INFORMATION (Cont) M. Circulation (Cont) SR -J3 /r Because of the close proximity of this proposal to Central Valley High School, the County Engineer is recommending that sidewalks be required along 16th Avenue. This will mitigate potential vehicular pedestrian conflicts along that roadway. Regarding the public testimony regarding water from springs which cause ice conditions on 24th Avenue, the sponsor indicates that Vera Water had a broken watermain and it has since been repaired. Drainage Plan Additionally, the sponsor proposes to exclude the Storm Drainage Retention Pond from the preliminary plat as shown on the 7/23/82 Revised Preliminary Plat of Record. The County Engineering Department indicated that the proposed lot line revision for Lots 33 thru 45, BLock 10, and the exclusion of the Stormwater Retention Pond from the plan appears to create a land use situation which will contribute to the perpetuation of the Rentention Pond site. It is recommended that an ingress and egress easement be provided across Lot 45, Block 10. This will assure future access to the pond for maintenance and upkeep. The Planning Department staff notes, that by excluding the Retention Pond from the preliminary plat will cause this property to retain its existing Agricultural Zone which will allow continued practice of controlled grazing of animals to assure proper maintenance and thereby operation of this drainage facility per the Operation and Maintenance agreement with Spokane County. 0. Sewage Disposal 1. Amend the number of lots to 284. Additionally, Spokane County Health District wishes to clarify their recommendation to exclude the tern "wet" and intends to indicate • support to the County Utilities Department that a public interim sewer system should be required to allow immediately connection to an expanded public sewage treatment and disposal facility when available. S. Schools Additionally, after considering the public testimony and re- evaluating the County Engineering Department with concurrence by the sponsor that because of the close proximity of this proposal to Central Valley High School, the County Engineer is recommending that sidewalks be required along 16th Avenue. This will mitigate potential vehicular pedestrian conflicts along that roadway. V. Agricultural Summary Additionally, the sponsor indicates that .by phasing this development in a contiguous manner, the existing agricul- tural activities will be able to continue until the last phase of this project is finalized and developed. 3 July 27, 1982, ADDENDUM 'i_ PE- 1423 -82 STAFF REPORT - July 22, 1982 III. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN C. Transition Area Eliminate reference to "and larger lots of the east portion of the proposal ", the redesign has proposed approximately 1/2 acre lots. H. Sidewalks Additionally, sidewalks are t.o be installed along 16th Avenue. VI.. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The 7/23/82 Revision to the Preliminary Plat of Record does more to mitigate potential impacts; therefore, the proposed declaration of non - significant stands per the original recommendation. V. LEAD AGENCY CONCLUSIONS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Zoning The R -1 zoning proposed is found to be compatible with the existing zoning around the proposal. Retaining the existing Agricultural zoning on the Retention Pond by excluding this area from the preliminary plat will better serve the operation and maintenance of the Drainage facility. D. Recommendations 7. (Re- worded) That the public testimony as taken July 22, 1982 has identified specific road and traffic related problems along 24th Avenue has been eliminated with the redesign of the preliminary plat. VI. CONDITIONS 8. That the proposal is required to be phased to mitigate impacts on the public facilities and services (such as roadways and schools). 9. That the problem regarding the operation and maintenance of the Surface Drainage Retention Pond have been resolved. If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. PLANNING CONDITIONS 9. (Re- worded) That appropriate utility easements and drainage easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat or particular phase of it, for distribution to the Planning Department, County Engineers Department, County Health District, and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 14. (Re- worded) That upon filing of each Final Plat the existing Agricul- tural zone classification shall be changed to R -1 for that Final Plat. 15. That the preliminary plat approval is per the revised legal description dated July 26, 1982 to the (7/23/82 Revised) Preliminary Plat of Record. SR -J4 /r 4 July 27, 1982, ADDENDUM STAFF REPORT - July 22, 1982 SR -J5 /r 5 PE- 1423 -82 VI. CONDITIONS (Cont) PLANNING CONDITIONS (Cont) 16. That a 50 foot wide easement between Lots 23 and 24 (or as approved by the Spokane County Subdivision Administrator) shall be provided for access to the adjacent property to the east (currently the Renz Farmsted) to assure access for any future development or subdivision of this land in the future. ENGINEER CONDITIONS 19 That the County Engineering Department shall review and approve, per the existing operation and maintenance agreement, any and all Final Plat designs and Plat dedication to assure the continued operation aud mainte- nance of drainage facilities affecting the proposed plat. 20 No direct access to 24th Avenue from Block 10 as shown on Revised Prelim- inary Plat of Record. 21. Access to 24th Avenue from Lot 7, Block 1, is prohibited. 22. That sidewalks are required along loth Avenue adjacent to the plat. 23. That a 60 foot wide easement for ingress and egress to the retention pond shall be provided across Lot 45, Block 10. The location of this easement shall be approved by the County Engineer prior to filing of the plat. OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNT Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT To Co. Engine sr" ; Co. Health; Co Utilities From John Nunnery - Subdiv. Adm'r Subject REDESIGN of Ridgemont Estates Number 4 - -- PE -1423 wire °' �irarTiFiMq mr� =s �711s tlt r Date June 30 , 19 82 At our request and urging, the sponsor has redesigned this prel. plat by adding additional acreage and increasing the number of lots by 69. The redesign is attempting to comply with the "transition policy" from URBAN west of Sullivan and SUBURBAN east of Sullivan -- -where urban density is making transition to suburban density. Please reveiw you recommended conditions against the redesign and 4,gia me another memo as soon as you can - - -- we have started writing the STAFF REPORT. *-4L PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM EXHIBIT B ALL SIGNATURE BLOCKS (ON PAGES 2 AND 3) MUST BE FTT IN, IF APPROPRIATE, BEFORE RETURNING ,20 THE PLAT ADMINISTRATOR. AREA AND DISTANCE* • Part I -'To be completed by applicant an d surveyor Total amount of land in this Subdivision: 139. Acres Total Number of Lots 285, . Proposed density of the Plat: 2.05 Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: None Proposes Use of controlled adjoining land: N/A i Mlhat is the driving, distance in miles to the nearest fire station? 1.5 stiles .. g Shopping facilities? 1 mile . Municipal Boundary' ham, ;�� highway adjacent LAND USE * * * * * * ** * * ** Comprehensive Plan Category: Suburban •Indicate the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings iDuplexes ( ). Indicate lots for duplexes: iiMulti- family'dwelling units ( ). Indicate which lots: oiMobile Homes ( ). Other ( ). Describe other uses: Describe any non - residential use proposed in the Plat: .None Proposed Zoning: R -1 . ^cIMPROVEMENTS** * * ** * * *' ** ** * *** 6.5 miles (Eli 1lwood) X ) Lots /Gross Acre Paved street or t'lr�ia s'�.�$ What'is the present use of the property roposed to be platted? Agricultural land. "''''14List type of uses: Cultivated land: 139 acres. Pasture: acres: ;Timber: acres. Vacant: acres. Other: Acre;: Is keeping of animals desired? No (X ): Yes ( ). Type: except domestic pets Do you plan to file the Plat in its entirety as proposed, or will it be a mhiti -phase deve- lopment? multi - phased To what level of improvement will streets be constructed? Gravel ( ) = Minimum: Aurb,and Gravel ( ). Curb and Paved (X ). Paved only ( )• Describe any combinations of above: 'What is the time period expected for complete development of the Plat: 6 years ':. 1 :4Street'improvements completed? 6 years Substantial number of lots occupied? 6 years Is dedication of any land for public use contem leted? (Parks, schools, etc.) No. ( ). Yes (X ). Describe: Additional R/W for Sullivan Road Indicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: 1,000 Nhmbe. :of bedrooms 3 • Estimated Sale Price $80,000 • �Y hI ,Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No ( x ). Yes ( ). Will any special deed restrictions be included in the sale of lots? No ( ). Yes ( x If "yes ".; explain: Typical residential subdivision restrirtivp rnvpnantc Square feet Acre. UTILITIES”******************* r* ************************* * ** * *** * * * * **** ** ** ** ***** * ** ** M . , Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank ( X )• Lagoon ( ). Treatment plant ( ). Other, or combinations (Describe) Septic tank with dryline sewer Indicate the proposed source of water supply: Individual wells ( ). Public system ( X ). Private .:community system ( ) . (',Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings): ;Underground utility easements ( ). Overhead utility easements ( ). `AU,tilities in streets ( x ). No easements ( ). `Indicate. the distance from this proposal to the nearest existing water;•main r A 7. Indicate. size of'nearest main: 16" & 20" mains inches. • 16th & ;,2 adjacent r'E'feeti,- • ' ' 4 14 "tea: ••• • 44 ,f1; • . • ' .4 NOTARY kil 1444 Wily c-. , purveyors name • NOTARY E&. Xceea "es EXHIBITA PRELIMINARY .PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) ! , _ITP .WAl2.:" ,,,h, .4 , ttip, kilt .,1 1 2i, 4 i , . . . .c • . ttA ffils N-, ., . 1.1' Am. tuad A,44 ersIgned; .swear.under IA e I:. • 1 , t‘f .4.I2ei. :A he P!99 A 4 ■ y tel l i ' urV t1‘,'' , . ii P iri, 1 the l' li.tlt:rofeperothatth r;ei!abcive response made: truthfait i'and to; the be 'at.; V my. o wl e age : r„.,Ii.f tirithefs0dar:pthalt L I : AM r TIE ')01.1trER 1 Or p,,,..v. • • t he Tgl.theidielialillerttlitHixrAil Ovizier,.6.tacherklc .witiv.is Written perMisaiOn from said.bWner authorizing my actiOnson hi a oi her ital : - al un so derstand; should there be any willful misrepreentaticn or Willful la:A yr fv.Lia Olisabsure on my part, Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of non significahce 1 .6at.it : might issue in reliance upon this checklist. 4 ;'-i,:::•' . ..l*: 7 • • . S .: :.. . ; • “4. • .15' .•:':;15:1' \AVN Date: \Si- (tor—a--• (Signed) \\ -t7 11 . 6.ddress) XL Phone: I \ ' :7 ( 0. 6 \r-l\c ;:. '. . Zip: ki\kc• . Date: (0/9„`R I% )- • ;4 4 A*44*** ; ; ************************ * *************************************************;*;;*;;*** 4,• f :4 t id • -.; .. 4 '‘,.",•;: m .. . , x . Part II - to be completed by water purveyor !4This subdiVision (is) (i situated within .1.i Ei are (a (nrt able) and willing to supply n (domestic) (fire) (ia4tha4sial) (commercial) uses: .0Satisfactory arrangement (hew) (have not) been Made to serve 1:SiEnature (only when items A, B & C are true and completed) our service area0 this subdivision with adequate water for this proposal, svr nick /30/ ga signa d title date i Z.4.1..1. * loitii, * 44****;*,04.*********”soctatm»rnii*********************************;*.”****** ‘;:. ' . ' Part III-to be completed by Health District A:gtHealth.District state field investigation of the site. . . B.t District .requirements for prel • iminary plats lizscOircrne44.-been ,... :' • . . t■', • • satisfied..T: • ( j ` , signature and title ****** rs-kirge 44,k et • ° , • , '1- t ;;Q:;: N r 'fFke rt; "X4 EXHIBITA PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued). Page 3 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Part IV To be completed by County Engineers Office County Engineers Office requirements for preliminary plats :,not) been satisfied subject to submission and approval of 'Calculations and drainage plan. Signature .2■ Signat •. .4r L * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ‘' Part V - To be comPleted by County Utilities Dept. County Utilities Department requirements for preliminary pia 6 4Jaalke been satisfied. Signature le , CLi 3 - . .Rlannimq Department Information 4si psi 444. ?Id 1 ) 4 :7, .• ( D. a te. AcCepted: P . r.'igti-Plat File No: ‘‘'Plat Name: t. Veniumbel Lots: and Title • ignature and T le * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * k 0-0—toF 4j±r .A2L-isk/ ec_c T• 4,tchobl,:District: 10h.0,4; • :7)1.10:tiFf2.' • tre ACEIVED 4 I it N. , 0 0 0 1982 , . • on; ,,:r'SPOKANE COUNTY 1. NNING.DEPMATMENT "0-4•,,,,-f-Lita Hearing Date: kizxiez Date / Zr/ Date t.) This part to be completed by Planning Depattmen 8:57Tep-441 4 4L0 11 71 Preliminary Plat Fee: F3 ifit Checklist Fee: OLLP a Zoiie Change File No: . Existing Zoning: Date Established: Advertised Zone Change: Checked by: t • . • -• . • 4. 1 • et gr- ' • *4414_, (haVe age -th841 -L PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM • ALL SIGNATURE BLOCKS (ON PAOPS 2 AND 3) MUST BE FILLED IN, IF APPROPRIATE, BEFORE RETURNING TO THE PLAT ADMINISTRATOR. • Part I - To be completed by applicant and surveyor AREA AND DisTANDE* ***** ****************************************************** ********** ** * ***** Mist is the present use of the property yroposecLYto be ;platted?* AriCUltural/.1andn• : List type of used: Cultivated land: 139 acres. Tasturel !"c•C Timber ' acres. 4Vacant : acres. !Other:. , A47; 4 , t A . r4c Acres 1 ‘ftr., o 41f r , • • 0 in; ".-Ve r••`-4 ' C• Is keeping of .animale:' desired? No ( X. lea Yx,‘TypE1:- except it:lames:0 c Praosed Zonini' RL1 DO:you plan to' file the Plat in its entirety- as proposed, or will it 'be4-4:51041i flopment? . mul t i - phase ik!.• . ' To what level of improvement will streets be conetructedyi Curb and Gravel ( Curb and Paved ( ); , Paved'On :Desoribe any b• com ;na ons..of above:: , 141 H...e.fl,Th " - ac• ';;; ' What is the time period expected for complete development pr. the:Plat:XtYOM • Street improvements completed? 6 years. Substantial .number Of lots Occupied? 6 years Total amount of land in this Subdivision: 139 Acres Proposed density of the Plat: 2.05 Indicate the proposed source of Private community syStem ( ). Indicate method of extending se Underground utility easements ( Utilities in streets ( x )• No Lots/Gross 40re, Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: Mone, ' ' Acres Proposes Use of controlled adjoining land: N/A . • yi What is the driving distance in miles to the nearest fire station? • 1.t t Shopping facilities? 1 mile MUniCipal Boundary: ' Paved street highway adjacent (Millwood) LAND DND ************ *****.******* ***** * ******** a. * a** * ...lit* a ** . * *** * . * 1,aaaetr:*., ... **** * a I a******* n c, C o m p r e h e n s i v e Plan Category: Suburban' Indicate the proposed land use of the plat: Single FamilyDwellinge ( X )., Duplexes ( ). Indicate lots for duplexes: . Multi-family dwelling Units ( ). "Indicate whi - ,i,..!1' : t, ... ; „ 4 1.Ft: • Mobile Homes (...] ). Other ( ). Describe other uses: • :tr.. Pr, . ', ,r,,:tv.. 4 , , . • , , c f FY '1 'PP . 1 ; 1 ' Deecribe any non use proposed in the Plat r " None: : , ! , ,, " ? 44, ,,,, )::. ,„ . ,,.. „ .. t ,, yr , 1.. ..... t. : ' t . -›....,' '.. i' ,'. ,nY,P "•"1 • • DITEKENTE** ;0****:* ***** * ************* * * ****A******”*4********‘************* . • „ . water supply: Individual wells ( ). rvice to the lots (Dwellings): ). Overhead utility easements ( ). easements ( )• EXHIBIT B Total Number of Lots 285 • - • . • 'frA 4. • .4 4" Is dedication of any land for public use contempleted? (Parks, scheolSii.e4) . No. ( ). Yes ( x )• .Describe: Additional RAI for Sullivan Road Indicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: /'. fJ, Square feet Number of bedrooms . 3 Estimated Sale Price Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No:( x ).; Yes (•.; , • . •.• Will any special deed restrictions be included in the sale of lots? No Yes Cx. If "yes", explain* Typical residential subdivision restrirtive rnviarlaiiteick • •, -'• • UTILITIES Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank ( ?(,). L ' Treatment plant ( ). Other, or combinations (Desaribe) Septic tank • agoOii ):: • wi thidryi -`!/ , • Public. 141:".U! • :sys • : • • • • ?VAT 16th & 24th Av Indicate the distance from this proposal adjacent to the nearest existing water main: fed.0 Indicate size of nearest main: 16" & 20" mains inches. • -OVER- UTILITTFS - ( Continued) * * * *..... iii► iii.***►#►**# ►i**i►. * * . **#*i ► **►ii ** ** ** *i*i *iii► #* ► ##i * * . List utility companies or districts expected to provide service to this Plat: Electricity: Vera -Gas: N/A Water: Vera Phone: PNBW ACKNOWLEDGMENTS*****************#***#►**i**►i►**►►i*►►►►*i►#*►►►*►►* ►►► *►y *i#i* ** *s i i** ** ***. PROPOSED PLAT Ridgemont Estates No. 4 I, the undersigned, have completed the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat has`kr. been pru. ti., -e ., a _ _.. _.. - partment and the - - '� - . r ..� , Coun a� -pa laws of the State of Washingtin s ' • (Signed) e2 • ;%6 .XYo'occ. : Date 46,9t, 28, /982 I, the undersigned, 'swear under the penalty of perjury that the "'above;,i•esponses are t.made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I further' swear that-I AMRTHE OWNER OF RECORD of.the site proposed as the preliminary plat, or, if. not:the'∎owner, attached; here t with is :written permission from said'owner authorizing my actions on his or,ber behalf. I' also understand, should there be any willful misrepresentation or'willfuJ. lick or, full 'disclosure, on my part,' Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of,,non sigasficance' that it might issue,in reliance upon this checklist. i,r. (Signed) � - Date (Address) E \? G c•� 4 ;tn - .itt,,, S. 25 Altamont Spokane, WA 99202 ' G C 6. Phones ' 535 -1410 -Zip: A9202 ,t Phone , Date tg- •if ■* Yi NOTARY purveyors name PRELIMINARY. PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) (Address) NOTARY signature and title E X H I . 1 3 I P A i********** ******* ************* *********** * ***** * **** ** ** ■ ** *** * ■ # Part II - to be completed by water purveyor A. This subdivision (is) (is not) situated within our service area. B. We are (able) (not able) and willing to supply this subdivision with adequate water.for' " - _ (domestic) (fire) (industrial) (commercial) uses. C. Satisfactory arrangement (have) (have not) been made to'serve this proposal. D. Signature (only when items A, B & C are true and completed) _ satisfied signature.and title . Part III - be completed by Health District A. Health District staff has completed a field investigation of the site.'' B. Health District requirements for preliminarrplats have (have not) been Signature . Page 2 i * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Part IV - To be completed by County Engineers Office A. County Engineers Office requirements for preliminary plats 4 (hive` not) been satisfied subject to submission and approval of. . age'; calculations and drainage plan B. Signature ' Signat7 and Title * * * *.* * * * * *.* * * * * * * * * Part V - To be by County Utilities De t h County Utilities Department: requirements for,;preliminary�� plat have (have. not). been satisfied.' s { '_ Sighature Signatur,e.,and,.T.it1e. * *. * *• * *.!lc ;t * * * This part to be completed - by Planning 'Departmen;tw' Planning Department Information E X H.I B I -T A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) Date Submitted: Preliminary Plat Fee: Date Accepted: Checklist F:ee:_ Hearing Date: * Plat File No:' Zone Change File; 'Plat.Name: Existing Zonings .Number of Lots: Date Established: :Location: :Sec. T R Ad'v,ertised Zone Change: ',School. District: Checked by: s sncua RECEIPT. tien_. ,9 kz J 4 Received From Date Acld ess �inti /t om " / ears <34� �; 3 0 • D A 4 0 t" BR DG h'ELLEY3 Nt /4.5r .entro91.1ey:::.1 4, r //LAKE 1 ( • PE-1423 -82\i ZE-32-82 cY1 26 tn 2TH AYE, C42 '2.7* . r • 2 ? ;. t ,:,000 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION REARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF RE: PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE- 1423 -82, RIDGEMONT ESTATES No. 4 ZE -32 -82 AGRICULTURAL to R -1 and AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. SPONSOR: 928 -1991 SURVEYOR /ENGINEER: 534 -1410 Sullivan South Enterprises Inland Pacific Engineering E. 12929 Sprague Avenue S. 25 Altamont Street Spokane, WA 99216 Spokane, WA 99202 B. LOCATION: The proposal is located adjacent and bound by 16th Avenue, Sullivan Road and 24th Avenue. C. PROPOSAL: The sponsor proposes to divide 139 acres into 285 single - family residential lots; lot sizes ranging from 10,000 sq.ft. up to 1+ acre lots. The existing Agriculutral zone is proposed to be changed to R -1 for the 139 acres, except lots 35 -40 and 42 -45 of Block 10 which are proposed to be Agricultural Suburban zoning. II. SITE /VICINITY INFORMATION A. Site Size 42M9 acres SR -G15 /r STAFF REPORT July 22, 1982 27 /1OT= ;Z II(o - )850 B. Site Characteristics The site is a generally flat, undeveloped parcel currently in Agricultural cultivated use. It is bounded on three sides by paved streets, 16th Avenue on the north, Sullivan Avenue on the west, and 24th Avenue on the south, and on the east by the "Ridgemont Bluff" ridge, which rises quickly in elevation approximately 100+ feet. C. Community Characteristics The proposal site abutts a neighborhood called Rotchford Arce Tracts to the north which consists primarily of single - family residences on one acre lots, most of which have horses. To the east and on the ridge overlooking this site is a neighborhood called Ridgemont Estates, which consists of single - family residential develop- ment on lots of approximately 1/2 acre in size. South of the proposed development is the residential neighborhood of Timberlane. Typical lots range from 13,500 square feet to 21,000 square feet. The land west of Sullivan Road is presently under cultivation, however, Central Valley School District has proposed the development of their Educational Service Center for 15 acres of this land from 16th Avenue to 20th Avenue if extended. In summary, this site is surrounded on three sides by existing single - family residential neighborhoods. The proposal constitutes "fill -in" by creating another residential neighborhood of 139 acres within this exist- ing community. D. Existing Zoning Site the existing zoning of the proposal site is Agricultural established in 1942. North - The existing zone classification is Agricultural Suburban, established in 1973. (Rotchford Acre Tracts.) West - the existing zone classification is Agricultural, established in 1942. South - the existing zone classification is R -1 established in 1968 (Timberlane Subdivisions); and Agricultural, established in 1942 East - the existing zone classification is R1 established in 1975. (The original Ridgemont Estates.) STAFF REPORT, July 22., 1982 II. SITE /VICINITY INFORMATION (Cont) SR -G16 /r E. Proposed Zoning Propose except propose Agricultural block 10. F. Existing Land Use Site - the site is vacant, currently being cultivated for agricultural purposes. Single - family predominantly residences. single - family single- family Land Use G. R. North - West - South - East - Proposed Proposed one acre 115 109 residential neighborhood. residential neighborhood. Propose single - family residences. 28 PS- 1423 -82 to change the Agricultural zoning to R -1, Suburban zoning on lots 35 -40 and lots 42 -45, residential neighborhood on one acre lots. undeveloped under agricultural use with few Lot Sizes Lot size range from 10,000 square foot to over in size. Specifically, the preliminary plat proposes: - 10,000 square foot or larger lots adjacent and east of Sullivan Road that involve 27% of the site. - 12,500 square foot to 20,000 square foot lots through the center of the site and one row of lots along 16th and 24th Avenues that involve 34% of the site. 61 -1/2 acre and larger lots in the remaining east portion of the site, which involves 39% of the site. I. Number of Lots 285 - single - family residential lots. J. Density The overall or average gross density is 21,245 square foot lot size (number of lots divided into the total acreage - -139 acres divided by 285 = .48 acres /lot). The overall or average net density is 19,120 square foot lot size (number of lots divided into the total acreage minus 10% for roads - - -139 acres minus 13.9 acres for roads divided by 285 = .44 acres /lot). R. Design of Proposal Existing Timberlane is proposed to extends north from 24th Avenue through the site in a curvilinear manner and connects to 16th Avenue. Existing Limerick Road is proposed to be extended south and west through the site from 16th Avenue and connects as the only access onto Sullivan Road on alignment with.20th Avenue extended from the west. These two proposed roads form an "X" type circulation pattern through the site. The proposal design also employes 13 cul -de -sac's to create "non - through" traffic patterns for safe residential areas and 6 of these are used to assure no access onto Sullivan Road. Both 16th and 24th Avenues have individual driveway access from lots proposed along these avenues. L. Development Timing The sponsor proposes to phase the development of this preliminary plat, in part, as a means of mitigating increased popula- tion and traffic impacts on the existing public facilities and services. The phasing would be for a 5 to 10 year period depending on the local economy and its housing market. STAFF REPORT, July 22, 32 PE- 1423 -82 II. SITE /VICINITY INFORMATION (Cont) M. Circulation County Engineering Department is recommending that 23 feet be added to the Sullivan Road right -of -way and that no direct access from the lot along Sullivan Road be allowed to assure proper safety for a major arterial, and that all roads be constructed to county road standards. Recognizing the additional traffic this proposal will create once developed, Sullivan will have ample capacity for this future traffic. Sullivan Road from 16th Avenue to Sprague Avenue is currently in the final engineering design stages and pending approval of these road plans "Letting of bids" for construction of Sullivan Road improvements will take place in Fall 1982 with construction taking place in 1983. Current road plans are for 4 lanes from 16th to Sprague with a signal (in the future) at 16th and Sullivan intersection. N. Drainage Plan The County Engineering Department is recommending the standard condition for a licensed engineer to develop a drainage plan to assure conformance to County and State laws regarding surface run -off, all prior to finalizing this preliminary plat. 0. Sewage Disposal The County Utilities Department is recommending that an interim sewer system be required per the Wastewater Management Plan, and that a sewer system be designed by a licensed engineer and approved by County Utilities Department prior to finalizing this preliminary . plat. The location of sewer pump station(s), the point of connection to the Valley Sewer Trunkline and the proposal's sewer system design will all need to be engineered and coordinated. In addition, the'County Utilities Department has made the following findings: 1. A 285 lot subdivision (phased or not phased) is large enough to support sewer operation and maintenance costs without deficits prior to full development. 2. The eminance of the Valley interceptor suggests that immediate sewer hook up to an interim system would cause the least amount of dis- turbance to houses and lots within this proposed plat. The future sewer connection to the Valley interceptor would take place by connecting the interim sewer system rather than making a connection on each lot. 3. The topographical features of the project suggest that local sewer collection lines should be designed and constructed with the propos- ed subdivision (or each platted phase) as well as designing the sewer collector line which will connect this project with the Valley interceptor. This will allow proper location of local lift stations, force mains and other sewer lines if needed as a part of a permanent• system. The Spokane County Health District also recommends the installation of a "wet" sewer system which could readily connect to an expanded public sewage treatment and disposal facility. P. Water Supply Vera Water & Power indicate they are willing and able to serve this proposal. Standard conditions are being recommended to assure that Water Plans are developed by the proponent and for approval by the County, Health Department, and Fire District. SR -G17 /r 29 STAFF REPORT, July 21 1982 _ PE- 1423 -82 II. SITE /VICINITY INFORMATION (Cont) Electrical Service Power will be served by Vera Water & Power. Fire Protection Fire District No. 1 is requesting a condition to assure proper fire flow and fire hydrants prior to the preliminary plat being finalized. The Standard Water Plan condition is being recommended. S. Schools Central Valley School District No. 356 estimates that this proposal, when developed, will produce approximately 108 students K thru 6th grade; 54 students 7th thru 9th grade; 54 students 10th thru 12th grade. They anticipate the school facilities will accommodate these new students, recognizing the proposal will be developed in phases. The District Planner recommends two pedestrian crosswalks at controlled intersections (note: County Engineering Department is planning a con- trolled intersection at 16th and Sullivan). And, also recommends side- walks within the proposal for the safety of school children during the dark of winter days with plowed snow. T. Parks The report "Planning for Parks" (revised 1976) indi- cates that this proposal is within Shelley Lake neighborhood, which shows a proposed neighborhood park associated with a proposed elementary school northeast approximately half way between this proposal and Shelley Lake. The County Parks Department did not forward any recommendations. U. Cultural /Historic Resources None have been identified. Q. R. III. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SR -G18 /r V. Agricultural Summary The proposal site has been designated as Subur- ban category on the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan which precludes retaining agricultural land uses in favor of residential development. A. The Proposal The sponsor has submitted a redesign of his proposal which is designed to conform to the Comprehensive Plan, particularly regarding the "transition policy ". The sponsor has identified a number of goals, objectives and decision guidelines of the Plan TEXT which they feel are supportive of this proposal: Comprehensive Plan Text Introduction, Page 10 Section 2, Page 3 Page 4 Section 10, Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 5 Page 6 Page 9 Page Section 12, Page Page Section 22 Page Page Page 4 10 2 3 2 3 30 Transition Area G.2.1, Ob.2.1.a., D.G.2.1.1. G.2.1., Ob.2.1.b., Ob.2.1.c., D.G.2.1.3. Ob.2.1.d., D.G.2.1.4. G.2.5., Ob.2.5.a., Ob.2.5.b., Ob.2.5.c., D.G.2.5.3., D.G.2.5.3. G.2.5., Ob.2.5.d., Ob.2.5.e. G.2.6., Ob.2.6.a., D.G.2.6.1. G.10.1., D.G.10.1.6. G.10.1., Ob.10.1.d., Ob.10.1.f., D.G.10.1.7., D.G.10.1.8, D.G.10.1.9 G.10.1., Ob.10.1.k., Ob.10.1.1., D.G.10.1.16, Ob.10.1.m., D.G.10.1.18 G.10.1., Ob.10.1.o., D.G.10.1.19 G.12.1., Ob.12.1.c., Ob.12.1.f., D.G.12.1.3 G.12.1., Ob.22.1.g. G.22.1., Ob.22.1.a., Ob.22.1.b., D.G.22.1.1. G. 22.1., Ob.22.1.d., Ob.22.1.e., D.0.22.1.4. D.G.22.1.5 G.22.2, Ob.22.2.a., D.G.22.2.1., Ob.22.2.c. STAFF REPORT, July 22, _,82 PE- 1423 -82 III. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (Cont) SR -G19 /r B. Map Category is SUBURBAN The easterly 40% of the proposal complies with the intent of this category regarding the level of services, aesthetics, and density. C. Transition Area Sullivan Road is the boundary between the URBAN category and the SUBURBAN category. The Comprehensive Plan has a dis- cretionary policy which allows for transition, in this case, from the density of URBAN to the density of SUBURBAN, as determined by the Hearing Examiner Committee. The proposal site is within the SUBURBAN category and on its west boundary at Sullivan Road is URBAN; therefore, the pro- posal is in the "Transition Area ". The preliminary plat design proposes transition from 10,000 square ft. lots at the west poriton of the proposal to 1/2 acre lots and larger at the east protion of the proposal, and transition is accomplished midway in the proposal. D. Fill -In This project constitutes "fill -in" for both the Comprehensive Plan and the 201 Plan and an efficient use of existing and proposed public services and facilities. E. Variety of Lifestyle This proposal will provide the public with a choice of lot sizes ranging from URBAN to SUBURBAN (transition) and the relative lifestyles associated with the different lot sizes. There are primarily four basic lot sizes - -- 10,000 sq. ft., 12,500 sq. ft., 22,000 ( +-) sq. ft., and a few 1 acre lots. F. Buffering{ There is no need for buffering since the proposed land use is single- family dwellings on varying sized lots surrounded on three sides by existing single - family dwellings on varying sized lots. The proposal's design has allowed for similar sized lots on the south and east as already exist, and has proposed lots at the north with similar frontages (but without the same lot depth as exist north of 16th Avenue). No buffering to the west is needed since it exists as a cultivated field. G. Utilities The proposal intends to have utilities in the street and all utilities will be available and /or per recommended conditions of approval. H. Sidewalks Sidewalks are to be installed along Sullivan Road and 24th Avenue per County Road standards. I. Water Quality Both storm water (or surface run off) and sewage effluent are being managed per recommended conditions of appzoval that comply with the Board of County Commissioners adopted policy for protect- ing the aquifer. J. Waste Water Management Plan The proposal lies within the Priority Sewer Service Area, therefore, an interim sewerage treatment will be required as approved by the County Utilities Department - - -a system that complies with the policies for protection of the Spokane Valley Aquifer. K. Energy Management The proposal complies with conservation of energy by fill -in development and using existing public facilities and services. Also, over 75% of the lots in the proposal are oriented so as to accommo- date passive or active solar type residential units if the sponsor chooses to provide for an Energy Plan and /or design. 31 STAFF REPORT, July 22, 1982 PE- 1423 -82 III. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (Cont) SR -G20 /r L. Transportation The proposal is adjacent to existing established arterials and roadways and is recommended to be conditioned for road improvements that meet the circulation policies of the plan. M. Summary the Plan. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposal significantly conforms to policies of A. Environmental Checklist An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and reviewed by the Planning Department Staff. No significant adverse environmental impacts were judged to exist that were not being mitigated by the proposal or mitigated by recommended conditions of approval. B. Checklist Evaluation Due to the size and location of the proposal, staff evaluated this proposed declaration for two criteria: First; Is there enough information available to make a determination of impacts? and; Second; Will the preliminary plat, as designed and proposed and as conditioned for approval, mitigate the identified impacts? It was determined that ample information is available such as the Environ- mental Impact Statements for the Comprehensive Plan, the 201 Plan, and for individual projects in the vicinity of the proposal; therefore, there is not a need for an Environmental Impact Statement to provide additional information. Regarding the mitigation of potential impacts caused by the proposal on the environment; the proposal is designed and conditioned to conform to the plans, policies, and regulations of Spokane County, therefore, the proposal would not need an Environmental Impact Statement to discuss the alternative means of mitigating said impacts. Slight adverse environmental impacts were identified on the checklist in the following categories: earth, air, water, flora, fauna, noise, light and glare, land use, material resources, population, transportation /circulation, public services, utilities, and energy. In summary, since there is ample information and the preliminary plat is mitigating its impacts by complying with plans, policies, and regulation of the County, the County Subdivision Administrator issued a "proposed" Declaration of Non - Significance, which was circulated for the required 15 days to other agencies of jurisdiction. C. Hearing Examiner Committee Decision The Hearing Examiner Committee will need to evaluate the public testimony if additional environmental information is given and evaluate the conclusion of staff to decide whether a "Final" Declaration of Non - Significance is appropriate. • V. LEAD AGENCY CONCLUSIONS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Zoning The proposed Single - Family Residential (R -1) zoning for all of the lots except the 10 lots in the northeast corner proposed for Agricultural Suburban zoning is found to be compatible with the surround- ing existing zoning and appropriate for the land uses proposed. 32 STAFF REPORT, July 22, 'i982 - PE- 1423 -82 V. LEAD AGENCY CONCLUSIONS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Cont) SR -G21 /r B. Land Use The proposed single - family dwellings ( "stick built ") is found to be compatible with the existing single - family dwellings on all sides of the site. C. Comprehensive Plan The east 40% of the proposal is in compliance with the SUBURBAN category of the Plan. The west 60% is in "transition" from Urban density to Suburban density and will require a judgement by the Rearing Examiner Committee; if the committee finds the proposed "tran- sition design" to be appropriate for this vicinity, then the entire proposal is in compliance with the Plan's purpose and intent D. Recommendations In considering: 1. That the site will physically accommodate the proposal as designed; 2. That the basic residential services (power, phone, water, fire protection, schools, etc.) are available and recommended to be conditions of approval; 3. That a public sewer system is possible to install and recommended to comply with the 201 Plan to protect the aquifer; 4. That the roads and streets in improved to accommodate the traffic; specifically Sullivan the vicinity are paved and are being existing and the future vehicular Road; 5. That the preliminary plat design has lot sizes or frontages that are compatible with the adjacent existing residential lots around the proposal; 6. That the purpose and intent of Design" is found appropriate, is 7. That public testimony has yet issues have been anticipated approval accordingly. Therefore, staff recommends this preliminary plat be APPROVED with the recommended conditions of approval and that a "Final" Declaration of Non - Significance be issued. the plan, assuming the "transition being complied with; to be taken, but staff assumes all and has recommended condition of VI. CONDITIONS If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. PLANNING CONDITIONS 1. That the plat be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and /or attached sheets as noted. 2. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for three (3) years to August 1, 1985. The applicant may request a one (1) year Exten- sion of Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. Such applications should demonstrate the progress made toward finalizing this preliminary plat. If a Time Exten- sion is not requested in a timely manner or a Time Extension is not granted, then the preliminary plat approval is NULL & VOID. 33 SR -G22 /r STAFF REPORT, July 21 1982 VI. CONDITIONS (Cont) PLANNING CONDITIONS 3. That phasing of the preliminary plat is required as approved by the County Subdivision Administrator. The purpose is to distribute any impact on the public roadways and public school district over a 5 or more year finalization period. NOTE: Time Extensions will be necessary, since more than 3 years are needed to finalize this preliminary plat; but Extensions are not guaranteed and additional conditions may be added by the Hearing Examiner Committee as recommended by the reviewing agencies. 4. That Time Extension approvals may be conditioned in a manner to assure the elimination of conditions which are significantly adverse to or conditions which cause serious deterioration of public health, safety or general welfare, such as traffic safety, overcrowding of school facilities and others. 5. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements unless the applicant(s) /sponsor(s) chooses to file a notarized Waiver of Notice of Action with the Spokane County Planning Department. 6. That each phase of this proposal be in substantial conformance with the preliminary plat of record as approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations, when approved by the County Subdivision Administrator, will be permitted, while variations not so approved are to be heard by the Hearing Examiner Committee as "change of conditions" in a public hearing. 7. That a name be indicated before approved by the County Assessor 8. That appropriate street names Subdivision Administrator. PE- 1423 -82 each final plat is filed; such name to be and the County Subdivision Administrator. be indicated, and approved by the County 9. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat or particular phase of it, for distribution to the Planning Department, County Engineers Department, County Health District, and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 10. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assessment of the pro- posal's adverse impacts to the physical environment; a finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of this project; and a final declaration of non - significance is hereby to be issued. 34 STAFF REPORT, July 22, 982 VI. CONDITONS (Cont) PLANNING CONDITIONS (Cont) SR -G23 /r 35 ENGINEER CONDITIONS PE- 1423 -82 11. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), fire protection dis- trict, and County Building & Safety Department will certify, prior to the filing of each phase of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will ade- quately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certi- fication will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrange- ments will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. Each plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that "the public water system, as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and County Building & Safety Department, and purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. 12. That a current certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the filing of the final plat. 13. That a statement be placed in the dedication of each final plat to the effect that: "no more than one dwelling unit be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purpsoes of creating additional lots or building sites without first filing a replat." 14. That upon filing of each Final Plat the existing Agricultural zone classi- fication shall be changed to R -1, except Lots 35 -40 and 42 -45 of Block 10 which shall be changed to Agricultural Suburban. 1. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to dedication of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the pre- liminary plat of record and as approved by the County Engineer. 2. That plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. STAFF REPORT, July 22, .982 PE- 1423 -82 VI. CONDITIONS (Cont) SR -G24 /r ENGINEER CONDITIONS (Cont) 3. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. County Health District approval is also required of the drain- age plans since drainage may effect the community drainfield sites. 4. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certi- ficate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right -of -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 6. All construction within the existing or proposed public right -of -way is to be completed prior to filing plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 7. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded. A 1 -foot strip at the ends or edges of all streets that termi- nate or border each plat boundary. (Temporary cul -de -sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) 8. A statement must appear in the dedicatory language of each plat that: "Individual driveway access permits will be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system." 9. Dedication of 23 ft. additional right -of -way along Sullivan Road. 10. That the final plat boundary be depicted as the westerly section line of S25, T25N, R44 EWM, and that the total right -of -way dedication from that line be shown as 43 feet. 11. A statement shall be placed in each plat dedication that: "No direct access be allowed from residential lots to Sullivan Road ". 12. Existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and /or curbed to the Spokane County Standards. 13. That all public roads within each Final Plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County Standards. 14. That sidewalks are required along the arterial(s) on Sullivan Road and 24th Avenue. 36 STAFF REPORT, July 22, !82 PE- 1423 -82 VI. CONDITIONS (Cont) SR -G25 /r ENGINEER CONDITIONS (Cont) 15. That Public Road Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section be: Section Number 2 for 16th Avenue with Minimum Paving width being the Access Standard1748 Number 2 for other public roads within the preliminary plat with Minimum Paving width being the Access Standard, and Section Number 2 for 24th Avenue with Minimum Paving width being the Collector Standard. 16. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees in new construction. 17. That Sullivan Road be improved to the TYPICAL Roadway Cross Section designed by the Spokane County Engineer for the Sullivan Road Project CRP 1679. These improvements shall be made on the east half of Sullivan Road along the westerly plat boundary. 18. That the intersection of 20th Avenue as proposed shall be located so that it is compatible with the location of the entrances to the proposed Central Valley Educational Services complex. This shall be coordinated through the office of the County Engineer. UTILITY CONDITIONS 1. The owner, his heirs and successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended." Each plat dedication is to include this statement. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. 3. An interim public sewer system is required. Plans and specifications for the interim system and the future connection to the Valley Interceptot' shall be reviewed and approved by the County Utilities Director prior to signing the final plat. HEALTH CONDITIONS 1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health District prior to any phase being finalized and the issuance of any building permit for this project. 2. Water services shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social & Health Services. 37 STAFF REPORT, July 22 982 PE- 1423 -82 VI. CONDITIONS (Cont) SR -G26 /r HEALTH CONDITIONS (Cont) 3. Prior to filing of any final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 4. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently pro- hibited. 38 July 27, 1982 File No. 'PE-1423-82 Findings & Order Ridgemont Estates No. 4 A. INTRODUCTION F01-S1 /r SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER This matter having come before the Spokane County Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee on July 27, 1982 and the members of the Committee present being Jerry Williams, Chairperson, Lynn Tennican and Ken Kennedy. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Sullivan South Enterprises, is requesting approval of a Prelimi- nary Plat, PE- 1423 -82 Ridgemont Estates No. 4, and Zone Change ZE- 32 -82, Agricultural to R -1 for subdivision of 125 acres into 284 lots for single - family dwellings, and there being present, the following applicant or representative: Dwight Hume and Ken Tupper C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That late developing information was presented by staff as ADDENDUM to STAFF REPORT July 22, 1982. 2. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed both approval and disapproval of the proposal. 3. That many of the public were concerned generally with the density or lot sizes as proposed, with traffic on Sullivan, with winter conditions as relates to the grade on 24th Avenue, with drainage and with school impacts. 4. That due to public testimony and information presented by the public, the County staffs, and the sponsor, the Hearing Examiner Committee directed the County Planning Department staff to meet with the sponsor and appro- priate County departments to redesign the preliminary plat as presented at the July 22, 1982 public hearing and reconsider their recommended conditions of approval. 5. That said meeting took place on July 23, 1982 during which resolution to identified problems were agreed on by the sponsors, Ken Tupper and Jerry Neal; the sponsor's agent and surveyor, Dwight Hume and Pat Moore respectively; and Spokane County Departments staffs, Gary Nelson and Bob McCann from Engineering Department; Jim Legat from Utilities Department; and John Nunnery as County Subdivision Administrator. 1 July 27, 1982 File No. PE- 1423 -82 Findings & Order Ridgemont Estates No. 4 C. FINDINGS OF FACT (Cont) 6. That the Hearing Examiner Committee continued the public hearing until 9:30 a.m. July 27th, 1982 to consider the results of the above meeting and resulting changes to the July 22, 1982 STAFF REPORT and the Preliminary Plat of Record. 9. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 10. That the site and vicinity was visited and considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee. 11. That the proposal site is a cultivated field. 12. That the information in the July 22, 1982 STAFF REPORT was considered including the July 27, 1982 Addendum to the July 22, 1982 STAFF REPORT. 13. That the public written and verbal testimony was considered. 14. That the Comprehensive Plan designates the site as SUBURBAN and is adjacent URBAN at Sullivan and west; therefore, in the "Transition Area" designated by the Plan. 15. That the proposal does make "transition" from URBAN to SUBURBAN lot size and the "Ridgemont Bluff" at the east side of the proposal provides a physical barrier. 16. That the site is suitable for the proposed use, single - family dwellings within the proposed Zone Classification. 17. That the proposed single - family dwellings are compatible with the existing single - family dwelling land use on the north, south and east. 18. That the existing zoning of the proposal site is Agricultural Zone. 19. That the proposed R -1 zoning is suitable for the proposed land use and is compatible with the existing land uses of the area. 20. That traffic related design and conditions of approval was re- evaluated by County Engineering Department and found the following: a. That 16th Avenue is properly sized for projected traffic and type roadway; F01-52 /r 7. That the proper legal requirements for advertisment of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 8. That an expanded environmental checklist was considered by the Spokane County Planning Department Staff. b. That 16 Avenue should have a sidewalk to assure proper pedestrian traffic; 2 July 27, 1982 File No. PE- 1423 -82 Findings & Order Ridgemont Estates No. 4 C. FINDINGS OF FACT (Cont) 20. c. That the lot line and proposed road redesign of the preliminary plat along 24th Avenue and the condition to restrict access onto 24th Avenue for lots of Block 10 will assure better traffic safety during the winter months; FO1 -53 d. That Sullivan Road and 24th Avenue conditioned for sidewalks will improve pedestrian safety conditions. 21. That the redesign of the preliminary plat to exclude the Surface Drainage Retention Pond will provide for better operation and maintenance of the drainage facility. 22. That the proposal consititues "fill -in" for both the Spokane County Com- prehensive Plan and the 201 Wastewater Management Plan (as the proposal is within the Priority Sewer Service Area). 23. That this 125 acres consititues another single - family residential neighbor- hood as a "fill -in" neighborhood to the existing single - family community. 24. That an interim public sewer system will be designed to comply with policies to protect the Valley aquifer. 25. That the proposal design with 15 dead -end roads or "cul -de- sacs" will provide residential clusters without through traffic. 26. That the proposal is conditioned to assure proper drainage plans and consideration for all existing easements. 27. That the development of the proposal is required to be phased to distrib- ute the impacts (such as traffic and schools) over 5 to 10 or more years. 28. That contiguous development of phases will assure on -going Agricultural pursuits on this site for as long as is possible. 29. That the proposal as redesigned and with added conditions of approval per the July 27, 1982 Addendum both resolve issues of safety and improve the public general welfare. 30. That the proposal, as conditioned, does significantly comply with many of the major policies of the plan; as suburban setting and level of services, transition area, fill -in, providing a variety of lifestyles, buffering, utilities, sidewalks, water quality, energy management, and transportation. 31. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use is not detrimental to the general purpose or otherwise harmful to the public health, safety, and welfare. 3 July 27, 1982 File No. ?E- 1423 -82 Findings & Order Ridgemont Estates No. 4 D. SPECIAL EXPLANATION OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT AND ZONE CHANGE APPROVAL: 1. Those conditions as listed in the July 22, 1982 STAFF REPORT and the July 27, 1982 Addendum to the July 22, 1982 STAFF REPORT. E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Sullivan South Enterprises for a preliminary plat PE- 1423 -82, Ridgemont Estates No. 4 and Zone Change ZE- 32 -82, Agricultural to R -1 is hereby APPROVED. Motion by: Kennedy Vote: Unanimous Jerry Williams - aye Lynn Tennican - aye Ken Kennedy - aye ATTEST: JOHN NUNNERY Subdivision, Admin'strator By i`„ / /,. .,m a ,1 DATE: d / 2 7 lf'SZ F01-54 /r / 4 Seconded by: Tennican ARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TO: FROM: RE: SR -J1 /r July 27, 1982 ADDENDUM TO STAFF REPORT July 22, 1982 SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE- 1423-82, RIDGEMONT ESTATES No. 4 ZE -32 -82 AGRICULTURAL to R -1 NOTE: Due to testimony presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee at the July 22, 1982 public hearing, the Hearing Examiner Committee unanimously moved to refer the application back to the Spokane County Planning Department Staff to work with the sponsor and the public regarding the: 1. Driveway ingress and egress of lots along 24th Avenue (as a redesign); 2. Surface Drainage Retention Pond operation and maintenance (as a redesign); 3. 16th Avenue improvement standards; and 4. Phasing of the development. Therefore, the July 22, 1982 STAFF REPORT has been amended per this July 27, 1982 ADDENDUM and that these amendments represent the results of a meeting Friday, July 23, 1982 with the sponsors, Ken Tupper and Jerry Niel; their agent, Dwight Hume; their surveyor, Pat Moore; Spokane County Engineering Staff, Gary Nelson and Bob McCann; Spokane County Utilities, Jim Legat; and the Spokane County Subdivision Administrator. The July 22, 1982 ADDENDUM is hereby withdrawn and not considered part of the staff recommendations, but remains as public record to the July 22, 1982 Hearing. I. GENERAL INFORMATION C. PROPOSAL Per the 7/23/82 Revised Preliminary Plat, the sponsor proposes to divide 125 acres into 284 single - family residential lots; lot sizes ranging from 10,000 square feet up to 1/2 acre lots. The existing Agricultural zone is proposed to be changed to R -1. (Note: this proposal includes a redesign of the preliminary plat which excludes the Surface Drainage Retention Pond from the preliminary plat.) A new legal descrip- tion dated July 26, 1982 has been submitted for this application. II. SITE /VICINITY INFORMATION E. Proposed Zoning Propose to change the existing Agricultural zoning to R -1. (Note: The request for Agricultural Suburban zone reclassification has been withdrawn. 1 July 27, 1982, ADDENDUM 10 PE- 1423-82 STAFF REPORT - July 22, 1982 II. SITE /VICINITY INFORMATION (Cont) H. Proposed Lot Sizes Lot size range from 10,000 square feet to 1/2 acre as shown on the 7/23/82 Revised Preliminary Plat of Record. I. Number of Lots 284 single - family residential lots. J Density The overall or average gross density is 19,172 square foot lot size (number of lots divided into the total acreage - - -125 acres divided by 284 = .44 acres /lot. SR -J2 /r The overall or average net density is 17,254 square foot lot size (number of lots divided into the total acreage minus 10% for roads - - -125 acres minus 12.5 acres for roads divided by 284 = .40 acres /lot). K. Design of Proposal Additionally, the 7/23/82 Revised Preliminary Plat has been designed with two cul -de -sacs to prevent direct lot access onto that portion of 24th Avenue with a grade. The sponsor proposes restrictive convenants to require circle- driveways on Lots 1 thru 6 of Block 1. L. Development Timing Additionally, the sponsor indicates that phasing of the project will be contiguous, each phase to the other, and the loca- tion of the first phase will depend on the type interim public sewer system approved by the Spokane County Utilities Department and the ability to construct a portion of the approved.roadways with this sewer system design. This will allow the remaining undeveloped portion of the pre- liminary plat to be cultivated or grazed, thereby continued management of this land. M. Circulation Additionally, the County Engineer's Department has reviewed the above - referenced preliminary plat. The revisions as pro- posed appear to satisfy the concerns which were expressed at the public hearing of July 22, 1982. As proposed, Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1, will have direct access to 24th Avenue. Road grades in this section of 24th Avenue are very flat. The transition in the terrain and road grade between Sandra Drive and Timber- land Drive and the associated adequate sight distance will permit safe access to 24th Avenue. The circular drives as proposed by the sponsor will enhance ingress to and egress from these lots. The County Engineer is requesting that access to Lot 7, Block 1, be from the proposed Timber - lane Drive and that access to 24th from this lot be prohibited. All of the lots in Block 10 will have interior frontage and will not access 24th Avenue. Access to 24th Avenue from Lot 1 of Block 10 should be prohibited, as recommended. 16th Avenue functions as a local access street. It is presently 30 feet in width and serves Rotchford Acre Tracts as well as a number of segre- gated parcels to the east. Typical Roadway Section Number 2 has been designated by the County Engineer. The applicant will be responsible for the construction of additional roadway (approximately 6 feet) and curbing along the north boundary of the plat fronting on 16th. This addition will then make 16th Avenue a total of 36 feet wide. 2 July 27, 1982, ADDENDUM 'ib PE- 1423-82 STAFF REPORT - July 22, 1982 II. SITE /VICINITY INFORMATION (Cont) SR -J3 /r M. Circulation (Cont) Because of the close proximity of this proposal to Central Valley High School, the County Engineer is recommending that sidewalks be required along 16th Avenue. This will mitigate potential vehicular pedestrian conflicts along that roadway. Regarding the public testimony regarding water from springs which cause ice conditions on 24th Avenue, the sponsor indicates that Vera Water had a broken watermain and it has since been repaired. N. Drainage Plan Additionally, the sponsor proposes to exclude the Storm Drainage Retention Pond from the preliminary plat as shown on the 7/23/82 Revised Preliminary Plat of Record. The County Engineering Department indicated that the proposed lot line revision for Lots 33 thru 45, BLock 10, and the exclusion of the Stormwater Retention Pond from the plan appears to create a land use situation which will contribute to the perpetuation of the Rentention Pond site. It is recommended that an ingress and egress easement be provided across Lot 45, Block 10. This will assure future access to the pond for maintenance and upkeep. The Planning Department staff notes, that by excluding the Retention Pond from the preliminary plat will cause this property to retain its existing Agricultural Zone which will allow continued practice of controlled grazing of animals to assure proper maintenance and thereby operation of this drainage facility per the Operation and Maintenance agreement with Spokane County. 0. Sewage Disposal 1. Amend the number of lots to 284. Additionally, Spokane County Health District wishes to clarify their recommendation to exclude the term "wet" and intends to indicate support to the County Utilities Department that a public interim sewer system should be required to allow immediately connection to an expanded public sewage treatment and disposal facility when available. S. Schools Additionally, after considering the public testimony and re- evaluating the County Engineering Department with concurrence by the sponsor that because of the close proximity of this proposal to Central Valley High School, the County Engineer is recommending that sidewalks be required along 16th Avenue. This will mitigate potential vehicular pedestrian conflicts along that roadway. V. Agricultural Summary Additionally, the sponsor indicates that by phasing this development in a contiguous manner, the existing agricul- tural activities will be able to continue until the last phase of this project is finalized and developed. 3 July 27, 1982, ADDENDUM .O PE- 1423 -82 STAFF REPORT - July 22, 1982 III. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN C. Transition Area Eliminate reference to "and larger lots of the east portion of the proposal ", the redesign has proposed approximately 1/2 acre lots. H. Sidewalks Additionally, sidewalks are to be installed along 16th Avenue. VI. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The 7/23/82 Revision to the Preliminary Plat of Record does more to mitigate potential impacts; therefore, the proposed declaration of non - significant stands per the original recommendation. V. LEAD AGENCY CONCLUSIONS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Zoning The R -1 zoning proposed is found to be compatible with the existing zoning around the proposal. Retaining the existing Agricultural zoning on the Retention Pond by excluding this area from the preliminary plat will better serve the operation and maintenance of the Drainage facility. D. Recommendations 7. (Re- worded) That the public testimony as taken July 22, 1982 has identified specific road and traffic related problems along 24th Avenue has been eliminated with the redesign of the preliminary plat. VI. CONDITIONS 8. That the proposal is required to be phased to mitigate impacts on the public facilities and services (such as roadways and schools). 9. That the problem regarding the operation and maintenance of the Surface Drainage Retention Pond have been resolved. If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. PLANNING CONDITIONS 9. (Re- worded) That appropriate utility easements and drainage easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat or particular phase of it, for distribution to the Planning Department, County Engineers Department, County Health District, and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 14. (Re- worded) That upon filing of each Final Plat the existing Agricul- tural zone classification shall be changed to R -1 for that Final Plat. 15. That the preliminary plat approval is per the revised legal description dated July 26, 1982 to the (7/23/82 Revised) Preliminary Plat of Record. SR -J4 /r 4 July 27, 1982, ADDENDUM TO PE- 1423 -82 STAFF REPORT - July 22, 1982 VI. CONDITIONS (Cont) SR -J5 /r PLANNING CONDITIONS (Cont) 16. That a 50 foot wide easement between Lots 23 and 24 (or as approved by the Spokane County Subdivision Administrator) shall be provided for access to the adjacent property to the east (currently the Renz Farmsted) to assure access for any future development or subdivision of this land in the future. ENGINEER CONDITIONS 19. That the County Engineering Department shall review and approve, per the existing operation and maintenance agreement, any and all Final Plat designs and Plat dedication to assure the continued operation and mainte- nance of drainage facilities affecting the proposed plat. 20. No direct access to 24th Avenue from Block. 10 as shown on Revised Prelim- inary Plat of Record. 21. Access to 24th Avenue from Lot 7, Block 1, is prohibited. 22. That sidewalks are required along 16th Avenue adjacent to the plat. 23. That a 60 foot wide easement for ingress and egress to the retention pond shall be provided across Lot 45, Block 10. The location of this easement, shall be approved by the County Engineer prior to filing of the plat. T0: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: COUNTY ENGINEER'S DEPARTMENT F'� 1. 111 SUBJECT: ROAD CONDITIONS FOR PLAT NAME R'(ttF, _ # q NuMBEIZ_ P 142_3 .* CONDITIONS CIRCLED APPLY TO PLAT UNDE1 CONSIDERATION O =that conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer Is given subject to dedication of Right -of -Way and approval of the road system as indicated In the preliminary plat of record. E 4 -that the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat Is atfectedby a Flood Hazard Zone. EE - construction within the proposed public streets and easements shalt be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate In writing that all improve- ments were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced; E 8 -no direct access from lots to 1/2 Right of Ways until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads; E 9 -no direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads; EIO -road design, construction, and drainage control for 1/2 Right of Ways and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the Developer; a statement shall be pieced In plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to l2•./ E15 -that a statement be placed In the plat dedication providing for future slope ease- ments as required by Spokane County along "SPOKANE 0 -that plans, profiles, and cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of 8 final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 0 -that drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the tiling of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 0 -no construction work Is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to Inspection and approval by the County Engineer; all construction within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way Is to be com- pleted prior to tiling the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cove. the cost of construction of Improvements, construction certifica- tion, "As Built" plans, and monumenting, the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer; that appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held In trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1 ft. strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Tem- porary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) a statement must appear In the dedicatory. language of the plat that Individual drive- way access permits be required prior to Issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. dedication of 23 additionat Right of Way along Ecz/ /� i eut_ A - iHtr l . additional Right of Way along additional Right of Way along EI - existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and /or curbed to Spokane County standards. that all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. OO hat sidewalks are requirud a long I u artur - Ial(s) on \ \s%in) (045_t. __ALE%• Publ l,. Head Standard ili'I;Al. Roadway Section (I) Scotto!' Number ? I.,r )V' {awe Minimum Paving width AecS?2 5 viibi.1cc{ ( 2 ) S u c t i o n Number 2. f.. rC•iher Dc.k_ c5(i }.Mlnlmum Paving width f) cc l 35____r. __ / k for Mlnlmum Paving width it( (3) Section Number % for - ____ __, Min Imum Pav lag width - COf / .eCTOY - cry/ _ (4) Section Number E20 -the word "applicant" shall include thu owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. E21 -to construct the road impru'vements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approv al of the County Engineer, join In and be a willing participant In any petition or resolution which purposes Is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said Improvements pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. At such time as an RID Is created or any Road Improvement Project .is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improve ments required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. E22 -as an alternative method of constructing the road improvement stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road Improve- ments stated herein by joining and participating In a County Road project (CRP) to the extent of the required road Improvement. At such time as an RID Is created or any Road Improvement Protect is sanctioned by Spokane County, the Improvements re- quired (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will * be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. E23 -that the following statement be placed. In the plat dedication: The owners, their heirs, grantees and assigns, agree to join In the formation of a County Road Improvement Dlstrlct pursuant to R.C.W. 36.88 at such time as a Road Improvement District Is created or any Road Improvement Project Is sanctioned by Spokane County. The Improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving) will be at the sole expense of the owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. E24 -that the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal acceptable to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway- County Road Intersection. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the responsibility of the Sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such Improvements furnished to the County Engineer In the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. E25 -the proposed. private road(s) as shown on the preliminary plat serving lots with: no extension possible; extension to serve 8 or less lots; _ future public Right of Way tract Is approved by the County Engineer. E26 -that private road(s) be improved to Spokane County standard for a private road standard serving lots. Subject to approval under section 10.207 of the Spokane County Fire Code. E27 -that the following provision be made that the following described property be held In trust until the continuation of the private road and the "Tract X" Is deeded or dedi- cated: a I ft. strip at the ends or edges of all private "Tract X" that terminate or border the plat boundary. E28 -a statement shall be placed In the plat dedication that the "Tract X" private road(s) contained within this plat Is /are for.the sole use of parcels within the plat until such time as the roadway Is Improved and establ lshed as a public road. E29 -that the following statement be placed in the plat dedication: WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, Improve, malntaln, or other- wise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation tor said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, Improve, malntaln, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement Is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns Including the obligation to parti- cipate In the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. E3 -the proposed plat shall be Improved to the standards set forth In Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No.'80 - 1592, as amended, which establishes regula- tions for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees In new construction. S ?■tN)('. COu tf�c. er r �'rr Tie 5 \t .M Rrth- Y -r7 CFW ic/> /7lcP�e itnerecienleryTS 1 %• N Alau e (3)1 Tt,a rt- 2c16 Avc., a -; fl .r yr ,cd '0741/ b. / SO %aT it i5 tcw1c)pSabt_ wJt, 16w kcL 4.c•u cF C[,i= i -n .l naucv' 7r hF !). 1,02/16d �i_& cr\t(•a Se ci -•, Sr (wiser.. Th 7h!(tt :rt- <'.c('.t.ly te,l T1nrt w lte' O ice rI ec7n Ty Et 11114 i%E F,rJC• -\ 91(:T t1/-. (h (c Tr,( A5 W.c L=e151 Sec c,v 2.;.ve / p -11i T �h �t R 44 E.L ;. M . an,r\ S411.4 1' 111E \.'c \ G,( CAL wil , DG.D 1 \T1 Al Frc That L..r:c b� 5noLe 1 +5 y <eET: 1 JFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHING ON 4 , 1YS TO PLANNING DEPAR1MENT FROM: COUNTY ENGINEERS DEPARTMENT IC )11 SUBJECT: ROAD CONDITIONS FOR PLAT NAME Rid /ee e:Ali #y__NUMBEI_Vt 142 'CONDITIONS LIRCLED APPLY TO PLAT UNDER CONSIDERATION O -that conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer Is given subJect to dedication of Right -of -Way and approval of the road system as Indicated In the prellmin'ary plat of record. 0 -that plans, profiles, and cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for • approval prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional CIvII Engineer. -that drainage plans and design ca'Iculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. E 4 -that the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat Is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. 0 - construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate In writing that all improve- ments were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced; 0 -no construction work Is to be performed'withln the existing or proposed Public Right of Way until a permit has been Issued by the County Engineer. All work Is. subJect to Inspection and approval by the County Engineer; all construction within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way Is to be com- pleted prior to tiling the final plat or a bond In the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover. the cost of construction of Improvements, construction certifica- tion, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer; E 8 -no direct access from lots to 1/2 Right of Ways until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads; E 9 -no direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads; EIO -road design, construction, and drainage control for 1/2 Right of Ways and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the Developer; • that appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held In trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1 ft. strip at . the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Tem- porary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) a statement must appear in the dedicatory language of the plat that individual drive- way access permits be required prior to Issuance of a building permit tor driveway approaches to the County road system. dedication of 23 additional Right of Way along Su/Jrt'RN /atilt. additional Right of Way along additional Right of Way along a statement shall be pllaaced� In plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from Tots to Sig/ /i✓fjN • E15 -that a statement be placed in the plat dedication providing for future slope ease- ments as required by Spokane County along EI -existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and /or curbed to Spokane County standards. that all public roads Within the plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. o hat sidewalks are required along the drterial (s) on S,: \■JUN A ._ marl : t.j TILE:. • 111 - Public Ruud Standard TYPICAL. Roadway Suction (I) Suct ton Numbur 2 fur (b Avc Minimum Paving width Acc.i.y.___ 5.TA ∎1(dAKl{ (2) Section Number 'Z Fero Thzr .1 Xj0,_ c%slb.M I n l mum Pa width __A cc`s ___,_S[F)N_har'C{. (3) Sect ion Number 2- F or 2,(11 Mlnl mum Paviny width C' /% cTa(L 57 (4) Sect Ion Number _. __ For ___ ____ Minimum Paving width [20 -the word "appllcan t" shall Include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. E21 -to construct the road Improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approv al of the County Engineer, join In and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution which purposes Is the format Ion of a Road Improvement Dlstrlct (RID) for sa ld improvements pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. At such time as an RID I5 created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the Improve ments required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) w 11 be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and ass igns. E22 -as an alternative method of constructing the road Improvement stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improve- ments stated herein by joining and participating In a County Road protect (CRP) to the extent of the required road Improvement. At such time as an RID Is created or any Road Improvement Project Is sanctioned by Spokane County, the Improvements re- quired (curb, sldewa lk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. E23 -that the following statement be placed In the plat dedication: The owners, their heirs, grantees and assigns, agree to Join In the formation of a County Road Improvement Dlstrlct pursuant to R.C.M. 36.88 at such time as a Road Improvement DIstr ict Is created or any Road Improvement Project Is sanctioned by Spokane County. The Improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving) will be at the sole expense of the owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. E24 -that the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal acceptable to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway- County Road intersection. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the fl l ing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the respons lbl l Ity of the Sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such Improvements furnished to the County Engineer In the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. E25 -the proposed private road(s) as shown on the preliminary plat serving lots with: no extension possible; extension to serve 8 or less lots; future public Right of Way tract I5 approved by the County Engineer. E26 -that pr lvate road( 5) be Improved to Spokane County standard for a pr l vete road standard serving lots. Subject to approval under section 10.207 of the Spokane County Fire Code. E27 -that the following provision be made that the following described property be held In trust until the continuation of the private road and the "Tract X" Is deeded or dedi- cated: a I ft. strip at the ands or edges of all private "Tract •X" that terminate or border the plat boundary. . E28 -a statement shall be placed In the plat dedication that the "Tract X" pr vats road(s) contained within this plat is /are for the sole use of parcels within the plat until such time as the roadway Is Improved and established as a publ lc road. E29 -that the following statement be placed in the plat dedication: WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, Improve, malntaIn, or other- wise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described In this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a but lding permit to be issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obi igatlon of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, Improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns Including the obi igatlon to parti- cipate In the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. 0 -the proposed plat shaII be improved to the standards set forth In Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 60 -1592, as amended, which establishes regula- tions for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees In new construction. Mat Si-ALI s p R<•ar\ be: 11TPrtcDr{ to \f„= Ty pit Ai Rrn,lc.,a.j C w',s Set (lesilNecl b(i The S ?n KANC'. `c�'t ttat +, ti3e �� r Tt, s .5.....\\ 1 VAA; V, wk. Y cT CRP ail 9. ?ac ininceP: /t/t.vTs ' Ai%\' ti:-' made t n i.) ti-.e. LR.% .1 (1 3 ,‘C \i e S SO A.-;1:1/ RIc&j The 4 :e•,Ter h RAT be -tin /� (t 5L) That N 1 e'i CroW l 4 2C Aye.. A O'rc. bC cl Stoat/ 1' /na:g7cel SO M47 i /S \l Cr:on:nit aVl= w,lt -, 14w k.ci /it CC The i=iNil r AUCC le Mir (1 ra Jt'fr -rt ceew rrgl VA hay LQ.:C4 \to ,.. �e:vi CC - Criv let•• 1\'1 5 t1�. f'ce' rt . hr tta Tt'ire v it 0-41(t r{ ay.. .E.i � E3. ' e6Tefti 0 jha� 1T�� F it�r• - \ p1e:T L be_ C\.�D,eTr )37 IC, 'w y ��rTrc,v vG p 5; - 1 t4 R44 E.i..:.DA• uric■ \ 111a 'tote.\ c. tC LA:' PCP1caTi n1 Freon n1At L,A:c bz. 5nowv /35 4'3 t-jEt: ' OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNT Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT 12-41 -6 ENGINEER'S; UTILITIES; HEALTH; HIST. PRESERVATI To BI DG. & SAFETY; C.V. SCHOOL DIST. , FIRE DIST.. #1 From John Nunnery, Subdivision Adm'r. Subject PE- 1423 -32 RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO. 4 R (; D I •lot; , to t." Date June 9 , 1982 a82 fad {�� ' , 1 ~ - a '"""4• Vii LE t This agenda item for the June 24 Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee hearing has been continued for one month to July 22 at the sponsor's request. Apparently the sponsor is considering additional land area and possible re- design to better comply with the guide for physical development of Spokane County as adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in the form of the Comprehensive Plan. Ridgemont, with its current design, is double the "planned" density, level of public services and facilities and aesthetic . setting as set forth by the SUBURBAN category of the Comprehensive Plan MAP and TEXT. JN /bkr OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNT Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY ENGINEER'S; UTILITIES; BLDG. & SAFETY To ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH From John Nunnery— Subdivision Adm'r. Subject RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO. 4 Thanks. John , „ Date June 15 , 19 $2 We have received your comments recommending conditions of approval for this proposal. In all cases, the recommended conditions assumed the proposal would be approved and there were no comments regarding existing adopted County. Policy for either the Comprehensive Plan or the Wastewater Management Plan. We are enclosing the expanded SEPA checklist for your review. You may wish to compare your recommended conditions against the environmental topics that relate to your department to see if there are other conditions needed or see if the recommended conditions you have already sent will mitigate the impacts which are discussed in the checklist. If there are additions or amendments, please for- ward to us by June 30. The proposal is twice the level of public services, the aesthetic setting, and the number of residential dwellings per acre as is called for by the Comprehensive Plan and the Wastewater Management Plan. As lead agency, we cannot "make" policy and are, by ordinance, required to support the Board of County Commissioners adopted policies; therefore, we will not be. able to support this proposal, which is double the density as is otherwise planned for. We also recognize that the site itself can be developed or engineered with the necessary level of public roads, sewer, water, and other services. However, it is clear that the Comprehensive Plan developed through public review and supported by Board of County Commissioners finds it in the best interest of 'the public's health, safety, and general welfare to have this area develop at a density of 1/2 acre per lot with the appropriate level of public services for this density: I.would appreciate your careful review and consideration of this proposal. If you have additional comments that could be placed in the STAFF REPORT, please lend your ideas and support. RECEIVED Mu C9UWTY EfGINEER JUN1 51982 ..m OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNT Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY ENGINEER'S; UTILITIES; BLDG. & SAFETY To ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH From John Nunnery - Subdivision Adm'r Subject RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO.4 Thanks, John P June 14 Date 82 19 _ We have received your comments recommending conditions of approval for this proposal. In all cases, the recommended conditions assumed: the proposal would be approved and there were no comments regarding existing adopted County Policy for either the Comprehensive Plan or the Wastewater Management Plan. We are enclosing the expanded SEPA checklist for your review. You may wish to compare your recommended conditions against the environmental topics that relate to your department to see if there are other condions needed or see if the recommended conditions you have already sent will mitigate the impacts which are discussed in the checklist. If there are additions or amendments, please forward to us by June 30th. The proposal is twice the level of public services, the aesthetic setting, and the number of residential dwellings per acre as is called for by the Comp. Plan and the Wastewater Management Plan. As lead agency, we cannot "make" policy and are by ordinance required to support the Board of County Commissioners adopted policies; therefore we will not be able to support this proposal which is double the density as is otherwise planned for. We also recognize that the site itself can be developed or engineered with the necessary level of public roads, sewer, water, and other services. However, it is clear that the Board of County Commissioners for whatever reasons find it in the best interest of the public's health, safety, and general welfare to have this area develop at a density of 1/2 acre per lot with a level of public services that would be needed for this density. I would appreciate you careful review and consideration of this proposal. If you have additional comments that could be placed in the STAFF REPORT, please lend your ideas and support. 5•On•nC C tint COURT nOY,C Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely ", as per WAC 197 -10) affecting the quality of the physical environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether Or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with.the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the degree of impact, asking you for more information, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision - makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages, if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnec- essary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for every "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required to provide explanation for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Sullivan South Associates 2. Address of Proponent: Fast 12929 Sprague, Spokane, Washinoton 99216 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: Ridgemont Estates No. 4 residences with a minimum lot size of 12,500 square feet. August, 1981 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Spokane County 1 [fe :n inn 3199? Phone Number: 928 -1991 S.r433a1NTIF :UHF AL/1%" r ' SPDXANE COUNTY PLANNING GEPAXIMEN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECK LIST FILE #:) ;c, - . c SEC /TWN /RNGY 25 -25 -44 EWM 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): The proposal is an 88 acre subdivision to create 216 lots for single family 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the Proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): See Attachment. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of Proposal: 1988 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required, for the Proposal (federal, state, and local - including rezones): Preliminary plat approval, final plat approval, Health Dept. Septic Tank and Drainfield Permit approval 10a. Do you, or the owner in the event you do not own the subject land, have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: Land to the east of the proposal is owned by one of the pronesing 7artners: This land will probably be proposed for development within the next 10 years. 2 lob. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's location? If yes, explain: Yes - see attachment. 11. Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: No. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Preliminary plat application II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil ?. . . X _ (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion or soils, either on. or off the site ? _ (f) Changes in deposition of erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion whichmay modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: Construction of single family residences may cause some topographical changes and will cause disruptions, displacements, compaction and overcovering of soils. 2. Air. Will the.proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? x (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? x Explanation: Increased automobile traffic emissions and emissions from heating systems will result in some deterioration of ambient air quality. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in.any water body? • (e) Discharge into surface water, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents,waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters' (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? 2 Yes Maybe No x x x x x X x x X 1 . Explanation: Construction of single family residences will require covering of soils with •impervious . surfaces thereby altering absorption rates and surface water runoff. New residents will require public water. The site overlies the Spokane- Rathdrum aqui- fer. 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: _Yes Maybe No (a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora, and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: and gardens. (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: See Attachment. 3 x x X. Construction of residences will cause a reduction in the number and diversity of native. species. New species will be introduced for use in landscaping 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or number of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organism5,insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna? - x x x (a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? x X Explanation: The site is currently in agricultural use and is a habitat for a variety of wildlife. Increases in species associated with domestic dwellings will compete with current resident species. 6. Noise. Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? . X _ Explanation: Increased automobile traffic and other activity associated with residential use will increase noise levels. 7. Light and Glare. Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal produce new light or glare? r, Explanation: No sources 'of currently exist on the site. New residences will be a source of light and glare. 8. Land Use. Yes Maybe No 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X _ Explanation: Fossil fuels will be consumed by the project for heating and transporta- tion requirements. Wood, gravel and other resources will be used in construction. 1 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or,radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions' Explanation: 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, Yes Maybe No or growth rate of the human population of an area? x Explanation: The proposal will result in an increase of 700 to 800 people in the area. 4 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for Yes Maybe No additional housing? X Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? x (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking X ' (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? x (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? _ (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? Explanation: See attachments. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? x (b) Police protection? x (c) Schools? x (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including reads? X (f) Other governmental services? x Explanation: The proposal will increase the demand for all public services and may result in the need for some new public facilities such as roads and schools. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Yes Maybe No X x x Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No x Explanation: The proposal will create 216 single family residences which will create an on -going demand upon existing sources of energy. The need for development of new sources of energy will not result from the proposal. 4 • 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems. or alterations to the following utilities: • (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communication systems? (c) Water' (d) Sewer or septic tanks' (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: See attachment. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazards or potential health hazard (including mental health)? Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view' Explanation: 19. Recreation: Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building' Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any will- ful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may with- draw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue in rel' nc- upon t checklist. Date: * /NO 3 /32. Proponent: 5.4 5,4)A/c . 41.41tyg)Please Print or Type) —��f42- Address: Proponent: Phone: Person completing form: Tim Lawhead Phone: 535 - 1410 Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No x Yes Maybe No x Yes Maybe No x Yes Maybe No Date: _X__ FOR STAFF USE ONLY Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: Based on this staff reyiew of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff: A. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recommends /issues a proposed declaration of nonsignificance. B. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommends /issues a final declaration of significance. C. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recommends /issues a final declaration of nonsignificance. Revised: August, 1981 5 I. BACKGROUND ATTACHMENT 7. The proposed site is an 88 acre parcel located east of the City of Spokane in the Spokane Valley and south of Sprague Avenue. The site is bounded on the north by 16th Avenue, the south by 24th Avenue and the west by Sullivan Road. Adjacent to the eastern boundary lies the Ridgemont Estates and Ridgemont Estates No. 2 subdivisions. Both of these subdi- visions are developed with conventional single family dwellings. West of the site across Sullivan Road is the site of the proposed Central Valley School District Educational Services Center. Large lot residential property is located to the north while residential property to the south and east is urban density. II ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 8. Land Use The site of the proposed project is an undeveloped parcel currently in agricultural use. The site is bounded on the north by 16th Avenue, the south by 24th Avenue and the west by Sullivan Road. Land uses to the north of the site are primarily residential in character. They range from mini- farm tracts of one acre or larger to duplexes. Considerable new subdivision activity with urban density single family development has taken place in the past few years (refer to attached land use map). One such single family subdivision has been developed on the north side of 16th Avenuewest of Sul- livan Road. Urban density single fancily development also exists east and south of the site. Land west of Sullivan Road, opposite the proposed site, is presently under cultivation. This is the proposed site for the Central Valley School District's Educational Service Center. The proposed project will change the land use of the site from agricul- ture to single family residential. Potential adverse land use impacts will be mitigated by establishment of an orderly development pattern and project phasing. Zoning The proposed project site is presently zoned Agricultural (A) (refer to . the attached zoning map). Land east and south of the site is zoned Single Family Residential (R1). Property west of Sullivan Road opposite the proposed site is zoned Agriculture (A). A portion of this property is the site of the proposed Central Valley School District Educational Services Center. Construction of the Center may require a zone change to either Commercial or Restricted Industrial. Land lying directly north of the site is zoned Agricultural Suburban (AS). The Agricultural zone permits residential uses with a minimum lot size of 12,500 sq.ft. and a minimum frontage of 100 feet. Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan for Spokane County designates the site as Suburban (refer to the attached Comprehensive Plan Map). The area adjacent, to site west of Sullivan Road is designated Urban. Urban areas are the most intensely developed of all categories. It is primarily a residential category allowing for single family, two family, multiple fancily and condominium building along with neighborhood commercial, light industrial, public and recreational facilities. .Densities range from 1 to 17 units per acre. The Suburban category is intended also for residential development with lower densities than the Urban category. Densities range from .5 acres to 2.5 acres per unit. The density of the proposed project would be 2.5 units per acre. This density could serve as a transition area between urban and suburban life - styles. 13. Transportation /Circulation The addition of 700 to 800 new residents will generate additional vehi- cular traffic on roads adjacent to the proposal. This addition to current traffic densities may increase traffic hazards in the area. Spokane County is planning to upgrade Sullivan Road, a major north -south arterial, in the area. Depending upon right of way acquisition, the County plans to upgrade Sullivan Road north of 16th Avenue to four lanes in 1983. 16. Utilities (a.- b. -c.) The project will require the extension of phones, power and water systems by Vera Power and Water and Pacific Northwest Bell, all of which currently exist immediately adjacent to the site along Sullivan Road. Natural gas is supplied to the area by Washington Water Power. The nearest natural gas line to the site extends south along Progress Road to 20th Avenue. (d.) The proposal will require individual septic tanks and drainfields for each of the 216 lots. Dry sewer lines will be installed to facilitate hook -up to a sewer system. A new sewer trunk line is planned for construc- tion along the Milwaukee Railroad right of way located approximately one mile north of the proposed site by Spring of 1985. ULID formation prior to 1985 would allow sewer connection at that time, thereby mitigating impacts from septic tanks upon the aquifer. (e.) Construction of the proposed project will alter the runoff and absorption characteristics of the site. Although the stormwater system for the proposed project has not been designed at this time, it will follow the guidelines and meet the requirements of Spokane County's "Guidelines for Storm Water Management ". (f.) 216 new residences will increase the demand for solid waste disposal services. Solid waste collection and disposal services will be provided by the Valley Garbage Service. Solid waste will be disposed of at the Mica landfill. Projected life of the landfill is 10 years. Early and close coordination by the proponents of the project with suppliers of utilities will facilitate their equipment planning and programming. tr 11116 lap eliWpVERGREENcl L151t) Aye F Jr High j aii ve 671; Asa o th,4 •,- // /// 4n flTh ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :•::::•::••••!•••• , C•!<” / / /////, ,- ,• ,. ./,..ftv///,1 /.//, / _ .• . _.• • ThEELAv.o.,•,- ./ / , • , 0 ; saLF;; ,,,,, ,,,,,,, ,, y+ ,, ,,,,, ,,,, ..,/,-,,,i ,,,,.;/,!,,,,,, . L . c n j ,,,,,, //if", . .. /.//4),....///, -7 — i 4 I , 15th •‘ n 14th Ava..327-...,./',•.....,.,.,',..,-,,/ .f.,,i ,......-..4 .vo •:,/,,• . .• Liz , T • r - .<<ki 7./.78 ' , ..--zi :1 _L.. SITE - (Generalized Land Use) r • .; • 1 ::' : : ::: : : I : l '•:::n:•:::'1 h Lonna Win ILLUILL41111.1.11 uoith LEGEND Urban Density Residential Large Acreage Residential Commercial EZZ21 Public/Quasi-Public Era Light Industrial Vacant, Undeveloped and/or Paature or Agricultural Use 0 iMilo snrteare" it • AS ADAM; Elem eons _ R�T6 A I pih 151 nvc CENTRAL %ALLEY ∎ HIGH SCHOOL rtayrlold .4S 112 l ' A ' . 11 Spraguo Ave 1-- MFS ; i cl 9th A 1 A 12111 Ave A 0] Rub LEGEND A - Agrlcaltaral AS - Agricultural Suburban C - Commercial LB - Local Business M FS - Multiple Family 8obnrban R1 - Single Family Residential 82 - Two Family Residential RI - Restricted Industrial MZ - Mining A 24th Ave A zoning C R/ prag e Av A A Sho /toy Lake L8 A 0 1 Mile cr 13th a3 u 1FAN I14t1 Avo ;la 3!) [ Jr L. !High l Ave _ L1 6th Avo 171h 1 7th Avo Loth / /14 . 4C ) ,, • 191h /4. // cr j_it 7- 2 (T CZ, fjt AV(11 . 4BAN 22nd 3Avo [---- -->1- 2,s,.c., [ r A-----,-- J ti • - IP . [ _ COIVINIERQbted. cz L 0, L 2/11fi Avo air VII way. - — SUBURBAN ■ • _ • -- • • 1(3111 Ave ( Generalized Comprehensive Plan (1980) , Sprague Ave C OM • • ;al re" ) ra 11th Ave th b /7 _ I RCIAL -.3.4pnpwrick. maco)*Misto ,ta - froseffiki1/41,10!,4.0 loato .0.".4,2ppit.11t4cpm 04, In •XIV weij.0.‘ 19. 40 voaaralth214-w URBAN - r2- cc r tth in -ra Pith j al -i i Shelley r in cD Lake ir i D.112 ._J ADAM 'a j 1 Elem j 1 0 g Mayfield ! I r • 1311-11 r A VO j • 1 r i nj I 1:&) . CENTRAL I — • I i_g n VALLEY i SUBURBAN L. 101 II m ,..., - 1 All-1-11[;5 (...=...-J...r._ LI 11 J 8gR i : pH PT 1:41 :5 r _ _ _ i , , a] SITE 0.‘ • SUBURBAN ) — 0 1 PAIN arnase•-wanosize= AGENDA, June 24, 1982 - SU._.VISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMItstk 9 A.H. (or as soon thereafter as possible) FINAL PLAT AMENDMENT 9. PN- 631 -66, WATER VIEW TERRACE page 9 ZN- 50 -69, UNCLASSIFIED to AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN SPONSOR: 328 -8928 SURVEYOR /ENGINEER: 487 -1658 C.N. Adams Investment Co. J. Paul Ramer 2418 W. Houston Box 18779 • Spokane, WA 99208 Spokane, WA 99208' LOCATION: The proposal is located adjacent and west of Long Lake (Spokane River), east and adjacent South Bank Road with plat roads known as Water View Drive and Westlake Drive; within Section 6, Township 27N, Range 41 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: RURAL (approved prior to plan adoption) PROPOSAL: The sponsor is requesting to amend the dedication language of Water View Terrace Final Plat with cooperation of the County Parks Depart- ment. Spokane County Parks Department desires Spokane County to own Lot 1, Block 2 instead of Lot 24, Block 1 for recreational reasons. PRELIHINARY,SUBDIVISION AND OR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION (cont.) 10. d`kZ4�` - -c; 'IKA PINES MOBILE ESTATES page 10 WITHDRAWN - 1:30 P.M. (or as soon thereafter as possible) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND OR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION We ai 11 5 P.M. ADJOURNMENT DGEMONT ESTATES I/4 page 11 CONTINUED until July 22, 1982 The Hearing Examiner Committee members usually make a site inspection, individually, or as a committee. Contact the County Planning Department for when the Hearing Examiner Committee is going to view the site(s). Environmental review of the project and project site is made and a preliminary decision regarding environmental impacts will be presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. The public hearing will afford the opportunity to present information as to whether or not a potentially SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE impact upon the physical environment will result from implementation of the proposal. NOTE: Most "Extension of Time" and "Change of Condition" are exempt from the provisions of SEPA. The legal description and details of the project are on file and available-in the Spokane County Planning Department, Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor, N. 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA (telephone no. 456- 2205). AG1 -0/b 4 OM Qid .tesrAThS ' :t A. PROPOSAL DEVELOPER or AGENT OWNER Preliminary a) Conditions b) c) d) e) f) 9) D. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: E. FINAL PLAT CHECKS Fee Paid: Date Number S P O K A N E C O U N T Y E N G I N E E R - - - P R E L I M I N A R Y C O N S U L T A T I O N - - - Project. Name: # J - �; cl�P�morVf Number of Parcels: 2/4 t 88 yc.ee Section 5 T. 0 2 ,g N., R. s<</ E.W.M.; Quarter 1 Name: SN / /1/AAt Se «YYZ E.✓Tneo.iscs _ Address: /a 9•a E ire 4, Phone: Phone: Business qag Home Name: _SA.ne Address: Phone: Business Name: IPacr — LN /anit.L `Aril c Cn ineerin ENGINEER --)f Address: 5 at, A/fA>nfllt 0 99 Phone: Business 53S— 1410 Horne B. PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION: Date: yl / /6 / 82 BY: 717c felLne-r _ Right -of -Way 30 -35 o.v Su/hvAA/ Curb _ Sidewalk fa .o in-, y /6 - 2q Pave /6 - 4araia/ singe/,ed Approaches No Dh?ecT Access T Drainage ,_p S yip firs State /City Review 'Yes ( ) No Remarks: C'nvrnT� /ras r/ev /yea ,Gcr /,Ycr ,v 4 4 Ad A / reNT n 84cL 2 0 e3 S t A ✓encce— S(' awcson om: // 'd :�r! F & ..mot..! im vTs r S .Po e d ,prdior To t P/.QT S e He iYo7 orr. /n .. c4 o4 ao vci M ch4a a ya do /NL /de 4u../ Th /•� mess - Myr�s ,4ci /:7(es at Cdi• Ed Sery CenTghj NOTE: proposal must comply wi Spokdne C ount Re.ulations for Roads, Ap- proach and Drainage in New Construction; ounty ommisstoners eso u ton No. 80 -1592 as amended. Conditions are preliminary and may change after field in- spection and review of County records. or Le4'r Mkt .0 CtAthoeti aATrar, nrg be repu:re.'. C. INSPECTION Date: / / By: Remarks: oar 0 Fee Paid: Yes \)) No Amount $ 1.280. c) . Cash /O S! Planning App Tit Signed: Date 4/ / /( / 2_ y• 7, r' Mathematical & Surveying Checks: No. 1 Date By No. 2 Date By No. 3 Date By Amount Check Home - deli ti CAM 54401444 Ro 4e4 ( Cash Additional mathematical and Surveying Checks: No. 4 _Dale B Fee Amt. &Dt.Pd. No. 5 Date B Fee Amt. &Dt.Pd. . __ __ — __ No. 6 Date B y Fee Arnt. &Dt.Pd. - _ No. 7 Date By Fee Amt. &Dt.Pd.� ___..--__ 1/31 ' , • a1/4,1.," . .- ....PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM • •• . • - ,1: ALLCSIGtiATURS ;SLOOKS::(-014 ; PAGES 2 • a 3) 'MUST- BE FLIED IN -' Ell'APPROPRIATE : BEFORE •IIETURNINt- ' • , . , r°1,-:9.4• Wart - J'''‘:.:Tci “ta..COnipleted by applicant ;end' surve ` r • ' • 4t.,,t..t:s.;, f varaini,,tisaficEt,,ttttly,it, . e i f , r) . -itti s r,re c i"-VVAT,I L :" *4 - . , 0 , .ki...er• - .' , 2 :.t , ze-f.''' itti‘.:::e„i; t';' '',, ' ,r -- ... ;: ' ' . ' ' `..:': .::,,,'- -',,,-‘,„ T :7,',44 ;-• - , • ,,, ..141.4 , i . , ”ta , :" rt ., , • , f',, .,.... l'.„!,... 1 . :tit. "... '. " ':' " 00' '. f *; ' 4 ' k l '':fe ; O: . 4 t .'' '':.""' ';''. 16111 11 if To . :ta.14731.nolint of land in t41 s Sub i, ff-.',, i Via i o : . NI. ,. 40 :vi .,,,,-; Y ,,,,,,,-; .7' , 4•41V tir l '• t, ;,4•1/.1!..11,;' " ' . 14 ,;,1 0 ? - • 1 '4....;"." •';'="11 ', ' ;r . ,,;.1.; „ 11 , ,,,r 0 ,,.. - .r." 30 7.. w;rtr 47 . i. ; .".,'.4 i .` , ..,',...',.: li . ;,, '', . r - :.„ , i It . ., t ‘;;:6:;-9:11-ctiri' frkwasirev ,13.4±..,•6 eiti ,-,,tii(i'a Plat i . . , V A.. . „ - , ..„..4, ..v„. -1:-...,,, rim , ...1: , Wir::„'.,!!!i?I'Siz.‘::C.f : 3:i :its/Gross A.Ofs hp 4 1t, - lit --.z7Z, :::.,,,-.: SiAe(44 ';'"Ai :' ' (.1-'.11-K. 4"-“'YE,""fr"P'?1..r'.!?' .. .,..t.,,,,zt!Vineliergylii'l, . t of ,:adamnitiggland,'Idontrolled,Thy,tthcei'reizaoin 28 l ii ic e; r to r lo i r:.4.4". E itoi.st - 11 rh-tPropones; Wee's- of; 'contr a.513 oininariand: 'a ' U ro ,1 ) 77r1:;',,rT:;;;: c,1,7:JjrWIC4,:;;!::: .1114;atC,Iiev-t1:14'4'4,4„?-vigigq#18.4c-,F,1),IFI.149?' .e.- 5*I ••• ;re a a ; . `. ** . ... .. „.....-1..r. - .t a. . ..- ... . . 'C r ' 8 / 1 6nOl Stajd nl .:1 11.Ciiieieet itthltsAi 1 e.:Pli.: eipel , %Boui c i ar y : •,-/ A 6 3:.,R les Ivr ''' c " z 4 - 1111.*V . a a t 2",:tir S ' WI' iec.154=01 /1.4 4- -. ,. -• ••-, ir a' . <- *" /-'. °: 1-0 1 l''4,Y4:■*`•iMi ll*.iSIWOOCINPC,VISteaKfa1ifrc5r .14 • .)Zhar,±1•..11*-1jaCenV ."apV1 4 427Mg,'.11441‘tto'0,42,:,"1140410.4.1,..e1',01.4. ttt i s rog;Ml i ji ,,.4 ? viiadni .4 _ 4 3 1 -41 1 ;;;-,"-- .- ' " .. t . e.4 'itlip*,,z• ,,7/±!frit.,p,„*.:,t,,,;,1t,t,,,V,t?"44",414:1.”*!...t.:$417r31.-..pt ; - ./424:11zieep imwkonstpii....24F,ifi4 • :foq.**irt.i-jviA-2,-'4UarSNA711,4t.n".04,titP4ftti'.1,'n64M''':7ti,&41Ath43:74.42"4::r4".1:47".4flis.., P 1,--.--7.7..r $ /7,,,4,:.„4,V4.14zg:r4i441g4•40•4:Thi.gaRctm.0.4)(1‘--vi gait rfkc.' k; 7 ,9 4 7, f r it.5- 4 1L4tiflt.01:4 0 , .., .. 4 'Su anf- ..4 :41"e'1,44,11,4•P•4- • ' (3C )t% ..0 "Y "* C - 011,1 “ 1:1 “ :17 . ,, L . e, - 1We1,1,5i 1 'V 1kP.;14 , a ti ...Pic eSita.... ,..„:,, ..,,, .„.., , . ,..„ 1 , i , t, .., i615.„. v • t at .„.‘• •,„, . 1 p.ziii4ai-6-afe:-.flieVpidi)p'secitleactliiegftt4e3-144- t4: '4-611*92$T1' 1 g 7 033 1 ' 'rWeiistr 4 It-At:‘ '''''PIC:4154:fte14-'t"'"" q i-4fiw ' stu " : ' .:.*' t - t r.: -‘:fo24.,:;$31-tig4t-i,itaiti,?::,.ettR "' ' .....-0 i: 1-t5trk.-.; e ': gilil t tfL I , it' 4 .3.-k r ' 4 ' r a ::n.L; : !?.. "14 hi ohjaeis .,;tvw.,:pi.:pzp;t.__ itii,iii-74;!" i l , lliir 407,04,bira: . D. gpyi jet iis t7 : 3 ;:;' , i7rattz,; ; :1;fg # 4.5: .N. 7 , : , 1 7 ,. ;;; ;I a; 1: e.tipittte,V-V, Ii i . '...\ tat f5 ;;‘ it id1/2 114t 4n * 1 4! I 'S' . 4164010.0k142e177-tiftw4i, i;:stystit..:Av . j;c1 A n 0 - .„ , :' rkv:- Milk. 4 '.14:"" : ze - t -Oat* ?:- " f: thetrna.671,t.:e,N414.4t74.14,g474;-., $4.,.,;;,...sitycre..,.......',.:.1,-.), Weacr propose . .,,• 3 4r. _ -A-..,„.2. .., 7 .., , 0 , ,, _.,,,,,, . : ,,„.,,, mr -,,, 4 -, -..i •. -^' .,' ‘rit',E'r ve,,noWl`';',Otri.'4'r1;"•1:••=1-1TriZ'a1:491':''''' tIP:4%*.J.1"a44"7"r ?..Z 11 1";•- 14 '$" 1- .." -1 t 4 A .`. 1 4- Cske. : 1 riahipil ,.:::5 . ..In titr-;" 4 / ' IA', 4`- ''' v i ixo 37t d ",.4.7,. , r . , .44 ,...4,...... a.44... ?.. ,rntim ; . V ; Se4 :71 1 # 11Ve ll e,a ' illi g lielficirtgp -r e ' rt m I Sr: o : 6 . /eatbls ' iiti,t faftitlattrA.grklul tur. a. 4 .q.- 1 4,ncli4 ... ‘.1, .,,.. 0 .,••• ' - i: . tfar ' . ,i...‘ ..7 la nd l icegt ' 1 c 4Cre" igarfil t i8 rWarbetr ,* ''' ''''' -,*...o , ■ • . ' A ' cres ' 4444'ia tOt l eta l tiV -‘-` ,''' ' ' ":'•" l %Ara. teew-..................,,,, - -- •-, - • ,,, -.:4 Oh. cip,,g,,,e3,, :`„k?..-1 / ••• - -• ' ' „., a , , •'„nc,..,,A,,, ti 11W:eiraf‘r=0:■:2-L4ire, :•irp,-,T;:sch,t6ggc,--:. , .4K° , 0 - ,,, ,4- , " --,,, kaltaitpt'?:14i4:,..!,-,i?-...!...„.ar.es: igtir4t„.);c,-;;en.c,,,ii,i„..„, ,,,z,..c,c;,pAill:),:-44.0,5p,..,z..y.ts :,..0, iiitiai.4,fo t mai s: 1413 P. "' ...%, 1 • •‘ g ' t'il'/I'liCrirater,.1/Z4,-,?1;'14-gfi, 44141-7•4b*,.•141**;*****.**14***,****, !?,. 4.1. L & ;1-eCtit" I li :J .4,$ ' kick 1 4 . $14 11 1(4 1 1,14$ • *et* 41$ 1 4 4 * , ,, , Vitzt, , ,,,: i i a icil,4 t , • 6," l',,- ;,-_,•• 4. „4•41.,, 1 4,•", „•f- -632,„...Ndel. ot,kis.r,i•L v.i.. sk, Aw.,,i4to5%44.,1941,A.:4i'c .; • • ..,xitp:7.7- r •i lr'+` ilm:1 407: 1 1g 3fAle4 itfr: X‘..iVt."104 ,..: - [,,25:;?-5c4N-7-9''''''JIIPjf• 1 +: 7 41 1 94 . ,' tVii'4a. nerW'LliCPTCYp:;m:4ectetr , aaiiked"OtheiliV:yHet.,S 1 A :ttl A g 4 A>s, ,...• cl'Oal :1 ;thilalkmle : ; , 71./zo:-t : TZ,t.'4.. ,..i,,a.;.,.„;• A , a *. ** . ;i t'i t , s1:r; ' aa""...re..,P7,•.4- ,* 0 — c * A s zr.ri t ,V5Pirik 's a q t ‘ tta L g:Ag: ' '.. 1 4:4fltkilt ..W 1 9,7,; . 14 1 ;1 4. 37,ti i gtigFirei 0 .-N 4 1 47ri' V ,4:'''111 k'''''' t Ro„ you pian<tofil‘thee a-Aiiiilti-phrthoodeVet.c ivt Aystitt„.1 c..t. ,,,,:ed.4,,,...strvoi,p,Asir,t.,...,. . 4t r i k il, „.o1 ;trzy) .: KAL 1 I. 4 zkiet401. -ri ; 1 4 , 4 ?-l i 0 \'' ! 4j, : t4 . c, Iatitabigil t?t3.0:11filt11,i-V2IchtgedWitifIAMIC,i;1Mitraitfl: t 2ii■ - N4tai:iitimi,e,IN4:7-$Pkt"'PIP;!‘ity ■ "4T'fi&- 4:2 ' 2 i1*-" '' e'?" 67 •4 1 ;t' 7 1 74-1 r # :-. 7 ' 7 $14,* 41. ' 4...'N .;ti I t 1.2iZI.ittn7 : 3 Oti. 11*,14(4;:411itiliroAlv. .t4emteiiii442:111::11"1:02184:tvlificbit-o:::°:14:8:,:ai e v nig, : 4 d e rf, 0 6 4"; -41 , ,,,c1: 11 ; 6 I.-:: tt'He.fkM1I714::121444-tatihill;14.4:ttkifteiNerk . :;le r. A ■ 0 NI' 'P. • what O t 1 : 1r j i t il; 61;:i ';:eilio: 77: A'ti: ltiti . i ij t l'T.. - . ? , 5!" : 1 ni l" ..t. t . . * 4: i t t . ;; .7 i 4 0 14 ,:. F . ::: l ? : F c e ctt; 4 1 iti 1.'it4iCaftPD‘c;?*114?)2:741. Y'11/*Ablnits":';;;N)':.e0''''''.1'1.4Le. iti:i4i1411645,1*;ii.‘`!4-..a../!1 W ,1,1.'yeiairs-:::.t42t4-)4. ..t+V t7i11 "? ;.tittiot;tittaiU1),‘c .. ,7 (`?rt 4 \ '. t iVic l oklotiN s CiettlE1711 . , - ■ , ,,:c . w1/4i4eict I Kpihat. \ :..1.47-4,74 .41., 70:4. 't(I'Lr173-ega?..*:6. ,YrScte.7.4.1),:ulo:Stanti.a:1-::.",71,,,T,..412-,;.;i1X11,,:;;..i,t,101;;;N:;,",f,,,`%,,,g; ',:40r,k 40 ge,;,,,i: n , . lqiift&igttilVINgibkZAFX-Wqe/M:t4441;044!P r 13 con*libre_t eirS 'rild'e'digCttn..."41S#1;,-;:eltrilltigil a I ffiddirfrona 1 . R ,W SUlti im . jet7i4 jaiiz oi.ty0).11,:,10. )1:!;j.IP'Esikc- '7.1 1, • •= ‘ , :rki:..a.•: - 07. A'„:1;li . . -.:. if.cI fi c f , i 1.4 ;k 1 E14146aia.,:t: 4 ,1 ii. f gi ..t.`::::5 R :.t.,. •.) lir ...eilicrik. b ,. ] struc e ... --- ' • , .......„7, f - ...,.- „Is 6 f icSkilitacate'r : the)P4toiR a4;14 , 4k..:o .. 4t titirs ,1:;••,:iiLi.tht:1).1:OPP1P,P .14',,,N9 .. ■,, '''• ' • • ' ;* i..,p r - .. , ,, t t, .,. . . , , t4fitze-esry, .,..rti,„4 :13 ' '. . ‘'' F - ''• '''' e -'4rit': Wsoid:. . cnr h i 34wNuinber of...Beth-pope ' - • e 4- - ., ; „ 5 .-... , t „.3 ,... ,. ... ,,, ex ,„ ,4 di 6,.. ti, ,.. .,..., .,..,,?,. ,,,,..Ny..v....:4,47,,,,,,.,,,74.3x2i7K-ib•iii.7...4 tioits4„,p-oggiti ; Sale In: , . zt,1- ._ f ..-,cp 1:•',:--t,;,:s, -, • ._ . ?!. •■ 4,,,,,,.. ; ia.. to di:Kci 2.1:4".aie.gzia:ip,..., ::::;13,147,:;,.b.uile.-,:t.ii:;::::,:eci-1:::: le ':ter:;!:":5th..?ed:;1::: s .4. -:f ,t: iqtt.".lict:'.( ..,:.").-7'.': 4371, : 7 .4 - 71,77 . 1;41 ,, r2i.".."...; ',..:, zile, ‘ 0; • 7 , - :;i:.: 1:cc'? .. 4.:. i .."'!M • i . 4 .-^ ; 1 ' * . ... c). :7: 5 '..4 ^ ;....C C :t.'VVI.'IS (... ' . ''1V4' Wille 111 4' ro 4,v.,...1,,,,; '.:‘,..il."1flg,lielik.a.:C:Q?994:. ■ a-,44.14a,.: .4 • .: .; t . • •., r t.:'4 * * ri • ' ' -I* 4 *41**411,141.4 '" 4 r 4 ;11W4 4tN'talt-1;'.riel):413■17,*Pie re*,,01ir-ri‘7 ' V '' '' ''' ' ' . *: ; 1$ flt-1:* '1/4 :.• '. „4**;°.*: "21'4,',?1,'Ir4101Mr*P1 eil'resi den 1 a1 :sub Iy 1 s: , k -,E,. , . ants -- '•.•=-••• it- 3-, :..... ..„,,,,, pi ,..., ea, .-• ' , - . • h .. - ,,, ' . • • .., si,;•,,,,,,\14,;,,i***v*:,„..,41.7„ty,t4 -,,,s oz ,.., 3 4 , -fr- t ' : 7' r71'.4'. 'illai4;;;;*,";°.;"*"*t;', lq.ft.f.,7* '4.4 ?an . jy, j;',.:: AtS :. ; t-i '''';...;;;;■ii■*11;'*..'nit7 ,....J..., .;, . it:,;-;....$,i.. 7.c k ;f 4 .1r, "ii..(c.. 0:0 ::"• :z4 ;Syn..— Of: " 1 ''';- I A--'1' '''.,,fif.giewage.da. “.. ,. ,trift,Ot' art ,1/4.,• • sw.-7”4:: ' ; (••• ,' ts i 1:14;4iiitli6iiiii!33:74711e7ria141116rill';q1tRiY(4::.bi'i;::::,;It( : 11:1759'.7 1;;:;:1: 4 :1 1 k ::: 1 / 1t i Ar g ; t f idstiii# 44. P:g . iti.:O th e r, , .4.. ,,-. e t, ifidicate,- & •Pr„?P:4--,,” 4- vr ‘'ecir4-combina'9.,,,, :.. ., . • .: 7- . . " 'V A ir - - 4 -Ssech ;.,. •,,.. VP 4 1 .*11.0iig,, Descr . „ .T,. ,, ; - :11, • - tank; .,..,...,f.,,..1.4,741;seIm.u.:4 N....rit; ........, r Sell 6b '(: .;.;''' . 1:1°-.'itr'Y t:4trii.ira' 4 :Oommutaty c eiyilam 4. -..'k • . 4 ., ,..' &,.; - .-.444 , — ,,,,, - ,,, - 4.„ .... '7; ; .4. , ' :f.'. w t .' , / e^ . . - '3 1;1.- ''' 22 4 • 1i. 1 (4•Wrt„ ;:4-6::1•>,t (. -ii:l :' - ... . f ; ' ::, 1 '; Yrt;', IiidiCkitionethod ' of , :eiteticling;reertijOet:to , --,the ; lots • 4. (Dwellings),: • ..,: k.:-,,;. .:...- :: 7 '.' , ;- 1 7'3 , :: : ;' , ./°' 401aei eebei•Aenta'ti9 ):;:l'.0";eiti&Leu03-1;eY.- easements ( . ? : 4 "j:/ ; !::: : 1. .itiaitiets • iii Liti•eets..(''' ., 7 ) ■ ' “ No - seasements ( . ).7 ' - ' ...; .).": .7 ' :.'..e :‘.:.-:.-.. . -7iAtir 16th .« 24th -.Ave, irrl . r c tii 't. V - cf1 2 4;;;•the ;distance fom this D il i :pow e r to i m in . lit a20, mains nearest e s the 'est ici Etin, water main! . . ,-. ' Adj &en t" ‘'.. =feet' nears s a '4"1* r 74 1. 0 1 °1 I i " 1 i 1 ' - • V. ".,... r i 1 4, j. ,g i " . . 4,34.4 8ta4:P.. C • . inches. , .:: ,*•:.. - ; .-;;;... " . 1 , 1/2 ,- . ti..,,; . ,t, ' „,,, & ;„ • 45 VER . .c --4 ', --,0• • - ,.. t•44.-. ,,, • < rft :.,. c r . .... a teOl I r'.4tr " . 'i ' ' . .. ..e! ..... . . '. ' .j»'. . . . :. . 4 JT IIiIT IES. =r{ C r## #a# # #ii ► ► ► ##► #aii►i. ►► # ►► # #iiw Ynf I, the Y uhdersigned; swear made truth£ully.;'ateto:the best RECORD. Of the'.site' proposed as ' with is -.written perMission. "from e + I alsc understand; ,should there ;disclosure on ny'part; Spokane that, it might i!ssize. in reliance, List utility' companies or districts expected to provide service to this Plat , Electrcit Vera' N /A' t Y Gas: Water Vera Phone ' PNWB j 4 SSE, :A mowL . ..... ►#i# i#►*#►►t# t##►►►►r##►3 ry ## ►# ► # # #ii ►ii #► ► # # #► ►► # # i..... ## ## # ►Yt# #i # # #}! the undersigned, have completed the 'information` requested;' and the' Preliminary „Plat has" een'prepared by ' :me under My supervis onin acc'ordance:wath the requii`ementa of the: Spokanes ountypl eparteeit t laws +of the:State W pt ash ;agtin c t •tt 'm '.. _ _.�� '�.:a� .. R.. . }i f:` ( ..\ i � 4 • .7; J L Y .... .... r. .3C5 }?. OPOSED AME ' PLATN '« ° R'idgemont Estates No �} , " ' E X H I B I T A •PRELIMINARY.PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) under the penalty of per jurythatzthe `above re'sponses:are of my :knowledge. I furtherswear, that.I AM;•THE bF' i t- the preliminary plat,.• or, if,`,not the owner, attached here , 1 -k; ^` said,, owner authorizing;, my 'actio'ns on, his'or her behalf i » be any willful, misrepresentatioa,or w111fu1 lack or full County.. may withdraw any'' declaratioaaof4non ' , - _upon'this:. 'X // s /�A .Thi's 'tsubdlvl slon' e (is i • ` t > y' a r ( ): not) situated within our, service area , We are (able') ( not °able) and wflhixi to supply „this ,subdinsiono."4th adequate? (dome'sttc)' (f ( industrial) (commercial) - uses: fit i . ':":".4.1'..” + Satisfactory arrangement (have) (have not) been aiade to,serve this.proposal:' Signature (only when4'items'•'A, B & Clare true 'and tcompletea) ' v' r h • . 5' signature .and title ;:date ti **4* ** * # * *i # ► * ** * ,., * * * * * * ** ►►►#► war ►► #ii *i+l#► #i ► *r ►#i ► #►► * \ #►# ► ►.': Part •III to completed 'by, Health District :, "r G A Health District staff has 'completed .a field investigation of the: site . ealth District requirements for preliminary: plats have (have not) been ° satietie ianature k d' E X H I B I T A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) Page 3 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A. County Engineers Office requirements for preliminary plats (have not) been satisfied subject to submission and approval of drainage calculations and drainage plan. Sab'ecT Ta ficn74T/on s O - v Cowf Sheer J B. Signature �� ' l r ` � ( � — _ `� / /d / f5. Signal re and Title Date * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A. County Utilities Department requirements for preliminary plat been satisfied, B. Signature Part IV - To be completed by County Engineers Office Part V - To be completed by County Utilities Dept. ignature and itle * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 19 Fiiem Dist 4F oR G. A 7 — ts Sin ,J wee FjOw RavuIleks Arrs saw "ra s gars / This part to be completed by Planning Department Planning Department Information Date Submitted: Date Accepted: Plat File No: Plat Name: Number of Lots: Location: Sec. Hearing Date: Preliminary Plat Fee: Checklist Fee: Zone Change File No: Existing Zoning: Date Established: T R Advertised Zone Change: School District: Checked by: JeJ!s/ I' 2- Date * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • RECEIPT Date 4-1L , 191a 5 a 32 Received From OVAL) ■- Addressj 29 E cvc>i;Waidt.-A Dollars For =.! -41 e Pink yr C AMT. OF ACCOUNT AMT. PA ID BALANCE DUE 8K808 gusto ACCOUNT HOW PAID CASH CHECK MONEY ORDER By r • 4st , .. .•••••••wa • SULLIVAN SOUTH ENTERPRISES N2 104 12929 E. SPRAGUE AVE. 926-1991 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99216 28-811251 /1 19 oc'e-- • $ AZeci „ , e e RO.,111•01.1•■■• 601. A MI Washington Trust Bank SPOKANE YIA SI1101 MEMBER F.O.I.C. For 11 LOI, II' I: L 25 LOOIJa I 5 5Eith0 q dul 311' Dollars 21: 1 ijfentr Sc 4 t 3 IA><ID� Charles C. Stocker Neil I). Prescott, Ir. As. . ai Se n done pan; ,l,,,,,a s�:,,,cs , Edwin I. Mikesell DIRECTORS Janet li. Bastille Dr. Bruce L. Gch man C.u. l'n.:Aim Darrell A. Thompson Sheryl L. McCormack Dr. Herbert H. Osborn EwHoper 'strict JOHN NUNNERY SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT N. 721 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WA. 99260 Dear Mr. Nunnery:, Thank you *for the opportunity to comment on the Proposed Ridgemont Estates #4 subdivision. Central Valley School District estimates that the proposed subdivision as drawn would produce the following numbers of public school students. We anticipate that District school facilities will satisfactorily ac- commodate these students. We note, however, that the nearest Elementary and Junior High schools are located west of Sullivan Road. The majority of students in grades K -9 will therefore probably need to be bussed to school because substantial pedestrian traffic crossing Sullivan Road would be hazardous. Since some regular pedestrian traffic from this de- velopment is likely to cross Sullivan even if bussing occurs, we encour- age the proponent to cooperate with the County in establishing at least two walkways across Sullivan at controlled intersections. We also note no provision for sidewalks within Ridgemont Estates #'4. Lack of sidewalks will further existing hazardous conditions in the Val- ley caused by numbers of children walking within lanes of auto travel. This situation is especially hazardous during dark winter months when school children may be forced to share the auto right -of -way in partly plowed roads. Sincerely, Dave Jac Director Facilities & Planning DJ /9g r No. 5. In the Spokane valley South t23 Rowdish, Spokane. (_nn) 0 22 -o:00 h 00 20o ECEIVE JUN 0:11982 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Estimated Grade Level Number of Students K -6 108 7 -9 54 10 -12 54 May 24, 1982 ECEN V ED 3ni.ti; 1 h rm htitatiad JUN 8'982 Sratiar14,4 U o & air ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6 FILE II: 5 Coun[, COVS,xOVSC 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: August, 1981 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Spokane County 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: Ridgemont Estates No. 4 8. Estimated Date for Completion of Proposal: 1938' 1 SEC /TWN /RNG: 25 -25 -44 [1*1 Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely ", as per WAC 197 -10) affecting the quality of the physical environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the degree of impact, asking you for more information, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision- makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages, if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnec- essary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be . caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for every "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required to provide explanation for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Sullivan South Associates Phone Number: 928-1991 2. Address of Proponent: Fast 19929 Sprague Spokane, Washington 99216 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): The proposal is an 38 acre subdivision to create 216 lots for single family residences.with a minimum lot size of 12,500 square feet. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the Proposal, as well as:the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): See Attachment. 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state, and local - including rezones): Preliminary plat approval, final plat approval, Health Dept. Septic Tank and Drainfield Permit approval 10a. Do you, or the owner in the event you,do not own the subject land, have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: Land to the east of the proposal is owned by one of the pronosing Partners: This land will probably be proposed for development within the next 10 years. No. 2 10b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's location? If yes, explain: Yes - see attachment. 11. Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: • 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to trefiled at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Preliminary plat application II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? _ _ X (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil ?. . . X _ (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X _ (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion or soils, either on or off the site ? x _ (f) Changes in deposition of erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosionwhich may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X Explanation: Construction of single family residences may cause some topographical changes and will cause disruptions, displacements, compaction and overcovering of soils. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? x (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X Explanation: Increased automobile traffic emissions and emissions from heating systems, will result in some deterioration of ambient air quality. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in.any water body? (e) Discharge into surface water, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents,waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? 2 Yes Maybe No x x x Explanation: Construction of single family residences will require covering of soils . with impervious surfaces thereby altering absorption rates and surface water runoff. New residents will require public water. The site overlies the Spokane - Rathdrum aqui- fer. 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora, and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing. species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X _ Explanation: Construction of residences will cause a reduction in the number and diversity of native species. New species will be introduced for use in landscaping and gardens. 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or number of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna? X (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? X Explanation: The site is currently in agricultural use and is a habitat for a variety of wildlife. Increases in species associated with domestic dwellings will compete with current resident species. 6. Noise. Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X Explanation: Increased automobile traffic and other activity associated with residential use will increase noise levels. 7. Light and Glare. Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: No sources of light currently exist on the site. New residences will be a source of light and glare. 8. Land Use. Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X _ Explanation: See Attachment. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X Explanation: Fossil fuels will be consumed by the project for heating and transporta- tion requirements. Wood, gravel and other resources will be used in construction. 3 x :uopleueLdx3 a;ParJ LLLM 1pLgM saauapIsaa ,'Liwe; aL6uLs gLz 042043 LLiM Lesodord ay •sLooyos pue speo.a se yons saL;iLLoe4 oLLgnd Mau awos .o4 paau aq; ui ;(nsar dew pue Saopnras DLLgnd Lie ,aoJ puewap ay; asearoui [Aim Lesodord aui • :uoL;eyeLdx3 X x x x 40 ;uawdoLanap 404 paau 3141 •C6.aaua 40 saornos buL2sLxa uodn puewap buiob -uo ue X 646raua 40 saoanos Mau ;o,;uawdoLanap ay; aapnbar ro 'Abaaua ;o saornos 6uL ;sixa uodn puewaa (q) X LA6raua ro an ;o slunowe LeL;ue;sgns 40 asn (e) oN aq eW saA :UL ;Lnsar Lesodord ay; LLLM 'Aba uj X x x X x oN aq('ew saA X oN ag7'e. saA •Lesodord ay; wool ;Lnsar ;ou LLpM Abaaua 4o saornos Mau CsaoLAaas Le3uawurano6 ray;o (;) Lspeoa 6utpnLouL 'saL3LLLoe; otLgnd ;o aoueua;upej (a) LsaLlLLLoe; LeuOp;eaaoar ray ;o JO shed (p) :seare SULMOLLo; ay; 40 RUe uL saopnras Le;uawuaano6 paralLe JO Mau ro; paau a uL ;Lnsar JO 'uodn ;o8; 40 ue aney Lesodord ay; LLLM •sa3tnras oLtgnd 'b[ •s;uawyoe ; ;e aa$ :uoL3eueLdx3 Lsuepr ;sapad ro 's ;sILoAoLq 'saLopyan ro ;ow o; sprezey 31.44er; ut asearoui (;) LOLd;er; rpe JO Lper 'auaogra;eM o; suopeaa;Ly (a) X Lspoo6 ro /pue aLdoad 40 ;uawanow ro uoL;eLnoaLo 40 sura ; ;ed ;uasaad o; suop3eaa;Ly (p) x Lswa ;sAs uoL ;e ;aodsuer; 6uL;stxa uodn ;oedwj (o) 46uLxred Mau r0; puewap JO 'saL;LLLoe; 6upgred but ;sLxa uo 5100; 43 (q) x Lluawanow aeLnotyan LeuofLppe ;o uoLlerauag (e) oN WW1 saA :uL ;Lnsar Lesodord ay; LLLM •uoL3eLn3JL3 /uoL3e;rodsuerl c6uLsnoy LeuoL;Lppe ro; puewap e 3323.13 JO '6utsnoy 6uL;spxa 3034 4e Lesodord ay; LLLM •6uLsnoN _ aidoad 008 0; 00/ 40 asea4oup uP up ;Lnsar LL•pM Lesodo.Ad ayl X ow aqe saA oN aq e saA tstooyos ( Luop;oa ;oad aoLLod (q) Luot;oa;ord a.Lj (e) :uoL3eueLdx3 •22.AP 04; uL :uop ;euetdx3 Leave ue 40 uoL;eLndod uewny ay; ;o aver y;Mor6 ro 'Alpsuap 'uoppngpa ;sLp 'uoleooL ay; ra3Le Lesodord ay; LLLM •uoL ;eLnaod •LL :uoL;eueL0x3 'SL '£L 'zt tsuontpuoo lasdn JO 3uaptooe ue 4.0 3uana ay; uL (uoL ;eppeatao 'sLeoLwayo 'sepp ;sad 'Lto '0; pa ;LwfL ;ou ;nq '6uppnLouL) saoue ;sgns snoprezey ;o aseaLar ay; ro uotsoLdxa ue 40 )IsLJ a OALonuL Lesodord ay; 5300 •;asdin 40 ASLJ 'Q 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems. or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communication systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: See attachment. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazards or potential health hazard (including mental health)? Explanation: Yes Maybe No 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X Explanation: 19. Recreation: Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: III. SIGNATURE Revised: August, 1981 I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, ful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, draw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue in r A de Date: 9 /oho 3 /y13 Z 50 .,t, S(iI i,vc,... Ors Proponent: Phone: Proponent: Please Print or Type) Address: Person completing form: Tin Lawhead Phone: 535 - 1410 5 x x x x Yes Maybe No x Yes Maybe No above responses are made should there be any will - Spokane County may with - upon t ' checklist. Yes Maybe No x X Yes Maybe No x Date: FOR STAFF USE ONLY Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertiment information, the staff: A. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recommends /issues a proposed declaration of nonsignificance. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommends /issues a final declaration of significance. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recommends /issues a final declaration of nonsignificance. B. C. I. BACKGROUND ATTACHMENT 7. The proposed site is an 88 acre parcel located east of the City of Spokane in the Spokane Valley and south of Sprague Avenue. The site is bounded on the north by 16th Avenue, the south by 24th Avenue and the west by Sullivan Road. Adjacent to the eastern boundary lies the Ridgemont Estates and Ridgemont Estates No. 2 subdivisions. Both of these subdi- visions are developed with conventional single family dwellings. West of the site across Sullivan Road is the site of the proposed Central Valley School District Educational Services Center. Large lot residential property is located to the north while residential property to the south and east is urban density. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 8. Land Use The site of the proposed project is an undeveloped parcel currently in agricultural use. The site is bounded on the north by 16th Avenue, the south by 24th Avenue and the west by Sullivan Road. Land uses to the north of the site are primarily residential in character. They range from mini- farm tracts of one acre or larger to duplexes. Considerable new subdivision activity with urban density single family development has taken place in the past few years (refer to attached land use map). One such single family subdivision has been developed on the north side of 16th Avenue, west of Sul- livan Road. Urban density single family development also exists east and south of the site. Land west of Sullivan Road, opposite the proposed site, is presently under cultivation. This is the proposed site for the Central Valley School District's Educational Service Center. The proposed project will change the land use of the site from agricul- ture to single family residential. Potential adverse land use impacts will be mitigated by establishment of an orderly development pattern and project phasing. Zoning The proposed project site is presently zoned Agricultural (A) (refer to the attached zoning map). Land east and south of the site is zoned Single Family Residential (R1). Property west of Sullivan Road opposite the proposed site is zoned Agriculture (A). A portion of this property is the site of the proposed Central Valley School District Educational Services Center. Construction of the Center may require a zone change to either Commercial or Restricted Industrial. Land lying directly north of the site is zoned Agricultural Suburban (AS). The Agricultural zone permits residential uses with a minimum lot size of 12,500 sq.ft. and a minimum frontage of 100 feet. Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan for Spokane County designates the site as Suburban (refer to the attached Comprehensive Plan Map). The area adjacent to site west of Sullivan Road is designated Urban. Urban areas are the most intensely developed of all categories. It is primarily a residential category allowing for single family, two family, multiple family and condominium building along with neighborhood commercial, light industrial, public and recreational facilities. Densities range from 1 to 17 units per acre. The Suburban category is intended also for residential development with lower densities than the Urban category. Densities range from .5 acres to 2.5 acres per unit. The density of the proposed project would be 2.5 units per acre. This density could serve as a transition area between urban and suburban life- styles. 13. Transportation /Circulation The addition of 700 to 800 new residents will generate additional vehi- cular traffic on roads adjacent to the proposal. This addition to current traffic densities may increase traffic hazards in the area. Spokane County is planning to upgrade Sullivan Road, a major north -south arterial, in the area. Depending upon right of way acquisition, the County plans to upgrade Sullivan Road north of 16th Avenue to four lanes in 1983. 16. Utilities (a.- b. -c.) The project will require the extension of phones, power and water systems by Vera Power and Water and Pacific Northwest Bell, all of which currently exist immediately adjacent to the site along Sullivan Road. Natural gas is supplied to the area by Washington Water Power. The nearest natural gas line to the site extends south along Progress Road to 20th Avenue. (d.) The proposal will require individual septic tanks and drainfields for each of the 216 lots. Dry sewer lines will be installed to facilitate hook -up to a sewer system. A new sewer trunk line is planned for construc- tion along the Milwaukee Railroad right of way located approximately one mile north of the proposed site by Spring of 1985. ULID formation prior to 1985 would allow sewer connection at that time, thereby mitigating impacts from septic tanks upon the aquifer. (e.) Construction of the proposed project will alter the runoff and absorption characteristics of the site. Although the stormwater system for the proposed project has not been designed at this time, it will follow the guidelines and meet the requirements of Spokane County's "Guidelines for Storm Water Management ". (f.) 216 new residences will increase the demand for solid waste disposal services. Solid waste collection and disposal services will be provided by the Valley Garbage Service. Solid waste will be disposed of at the Mica landfill. Projected life of the landfill is 10 years. Early and close coordination by the proponents of the project with suppliers of utilities will facilitate their equipment planning and programming. Urban Denelty Residential Large Acreage Residential Commercial Vacant, Undeveloped and/or Pat:tura or A ricaltural Use LL.: 1 7iLf1 r r Jr . 2Hight OJ I - • - ,'szin r um DTRil _ 4 Ltsth. Ave I 16th Ave tAv • -0 • n cc — // Sth L r [7 - III: 77, , nu Y. P i , RJA_Iii twit3 ' 15th t_Lgzsi 'Aye_ IT .',//,/,,.,......,,,,, • L V 2//////717/2727. ///////// • !I_ LI /// "//1 / // / / %%/// //, //./ '% / '//, ' 7/ ---------------------------- /// ////// / /////// // Generalized Land Use 49 nit ... ............................... • • • • ........... SITE //////////////, ////////////// 7/ /// //////////// / ///// "/ / / //1„b'/ /(„ %/ '// ih,Avs////),s.).// ,„„ jr „„, /////// '////,'./.' // '7/7/3. Wei/ Q-•/ .,///// /////, 7/ /11//, ///// /7//77 ,;S••, // .•,// /// /t /77/ / / // ,'., // // //////t,-*/// 7/ ./// •/././.,./; ',.///, ./ •,. ,.. - ... - . - • 1 1 0 0 ..... .... 11' Shelley <, Lake rfatavkitThe..- •.. a a ‘vosit north LEGEND AS a .FS* IL 61h ADAM; Elam c 151 Av.? 22nd Ave R 1. .... Play(lold CENTRAL VALLEY A. HIGH SCHOOL A Sprague Ave MFS A 1201 9111 J tF;!7I A A o t i rL , Av_o VEROREEN,i A r 5th Avo r-- Jr y .. L ,Hi I _._._. 1Gth Avo A - Agricultural • AS - Agricultural Suburban C - Commercial LB - Local Business MFSE Multiple Family Suburban R1 - Single Family Residential R2 - Two Family Residential RI - Restricted Industrial MZ - Mining A 2•th Ave R1 • ( Zoning A A Dr A LB C C L A 1 RI Shelley Lake A 0 1 Mile y Ir i r C®NMMER L :: i ro : Ybrh +n.irltrvw� ✓.'ii.iFi.xs. rrd - xfiee+n:N'�'� rdp�'t..G C a URBAN t!�IR 6th l , Gth Oth L9 1 L -- loth _J VERCREEN,i 15th -Avo r Jr t _,R18E J j 16th Ave I 171h )1 1� I'7ttt :' i Q $5. Y9 Lt „/'t 19th Sprague Ave- IT I 1 Ave Il— ,0 J I 12t-t 1 l Ave [_ p. n N in 0 ADAM rn Elem o. lol m 13th0 AN L r ii�l u4th Ave [14th,LAve 0 L » cc v i N m 1st Ave -o it - -. =___ BA Itl =22_ Avo..___' II NI - G: SUBURBAN lSth ll 24th Ave Plnyfield CENTRAL VALLEY NICK RCROOLJ 1 11h Ave lat j O. G r :Fit if -- !l -_ SITE 1611) Ave Sprague Ave 1 SUBURBAN 1 SUBURBAN C /^ (eneralized Comprehensive PianT (1960) it COM RCIAL 0 U PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM ALL SIGNATURE BLOCKS (ON PAGES 2 AND 3) MUST BE FILLED IN,,IF APPROPRIATE, BEFORE RETURNING TO THE PLAT ADMINISTRATOR. Part I - To be completed by applicant and surveyor AREA AND DISTANCE************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *: Total amount of land in this Subdivision: Proposed density of the Plat: 2.45 Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: Proposes Use of controlled adjoining land: Uncertain at this time. 88 Acres Total Number of Lots 216 Comprehensive Plan Category: Suburban Indicate the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings Duplexes ( ). Indicate lots for duplexes: Multi - family dwelling units ( ). Indicate which lots: Mobile Homes ( ). Other ( ). Describe other uses: Describe any non - residential use proposed in the Plat: None What is the time period expected for complete development of the Plat: 6 years Is dedication of any land for public use contempleted? (Parks, schools, etc.) No. ( ). Yes ( X ). Describe: Additional R/W for Sullivan Road Indicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: 1,500 Number of bedrooms 3 Estimated Sale Price $80,000 EXHIBIT B 28 Lots /Gross Acre What is the driving distance in miles to the nearest fire station? 1.5 miles Shopping facilities? 1 mile Municipal Boundary: 6.5 miles Paved street or highway Adjacent ? (Millwood) LAND USE********************************************************* * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. What is the present use of the property proposed to be platted? Agricultural land List type of uses: Cultivated land: 88 acres. Pasture: acres. Timber: acres. Vacant: acres. Other: Acres Is keeping of animals desired? No ( X )• Yes ( ). Type: Except domestic pets Proposed Zoning: Agricultural IMPROVEMENTS ** ************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *.‘ Do you plan to file the Plat in its entirety as proposed, or will it be a multi - phase deve- lopment? multi - phased To what level of improvement will streets be constructed? Gravel ( ) - Minimum, Curb and Gravel ( ). Curb and Paved ( X ). Paved only ( ). Describe any combinations of above: Street improvements completed? 6 yrs Substantial number of lots occupied? b years Square feet Acres Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No ( ). Yes ( x ). Lots will be sold to builders. Will any special deed restrictions be included in the sale of lots? No ( ). Yes ( X ). If "yes ", explain: Typical residential subdivision restrictive covenants. UTILIT IES ** ***************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank (XX ). Lagoon ( ). ..' plant ( ), Other, or combinations (Describe) Indicate the proposed source of water supply: Individual. wells ( ). Public system ( xx). Private community system ( ). Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings): Underground utility easements ( xx). Overhead utility easements ( ). Utilities in streets ( ). No easements ( ). • 16th & 24th Ave. Indicate the distance from this proposal to the nearest existing water main Adjacent feet Indicate size of nearest main: 16 " &20' mains, inches. -OVER- UTILITTFS - ( Continued)************* ** * * ** * * * * * * * * * *i * * * * * ** * * ** ** List utility companies or districts expected to provide service to this Plat: Electricity: Vera •Gas: N/A Water: Vera ACKNOWLEDGMENTS * ** * *° * *• * * * ** PROPOSED PLAT NAME: Ridgemont Estates No. 4 NOTARY S ettID VEKA WATER 3 PowER purveyors name E X H I B I P A. PRELIMINARY. PLATAPPLICATION FORM (Continued) Part II - to be completed by water purveyor ASST. MG,i2 and title Phone: I, the undersigned, have completed the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat has been prepared by me under my supervision in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County P1_..'._ 'epartment and the laws of the State of Washingtin, (Signed) �aazti Date: 4/4 4q,2 (Address) F 12720 Nora Avenue Phone: 922 -1300 Spokane, WA Zip: 99216 I, the undersigned, 'swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I further swear that I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD of the site proposed as the preliminary plat, or, if not the owner, attached here - with -is written permission from said'owner authorizing my actions on his or her behalf. I also understand, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack or full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of non significance that it might issue in_reliance upoh this checklist. (Signed) "(Address) E / 14W --f Date: y / // /Z Phone: y,2/- c7 /7 Zip: 77' /6 Date: A. This subdivision (is) &4t- ot) situated within our service area, B. We are (able) (2,4e) and willing to supply this subdivision with adequate water for (domestic) ( (iadue4eSal) (p e ) uses. C. Satisfactory arrangement (hares) (have not) been made to serve this proposal. D. Signature (only when items A, B & C are true and completed) si Part III -to be completed by Health District A. Health District staff has completed a field investigation of the ,si B. Health District requirements for preliminary plats Itave nat4 satisfied. PNWB Page 2 9 / i /8Z date E X H I I B I T A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) Page 3 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Part IV - To be completed by County Engineers Office A. County Engineers Office requirements for preliminary plats e (have not) been satisfied subject to submission and approval of drainage calculations and drainage plan. 5abiecT Ta 12zr /07-n5 ow Cov� 5*lee?. B. Signature Signa re and Title * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Part V - To be completed by County Utilities Dept. A. County Utilities Department requirements for preliminary plat (bane- *e.t<) been satisfied. B. Signature gnature and itle * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *• * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * A Ntse Fihem past 4F 1 Ole G. TI /QE� /i /r1/C Ir9GlL )74.21(-4 .7 JMcs L k' /' yz �� I 'tin noel/ Jee QN1/FEYNCA7T5 C/ Sia v97vt E Ag7F This part to be completed by Planning Department Planning Department Information l�. t X Date Submitted: L l /� -z Preliminary Plat Fee: Date Accepted: J /,Z Checklist Fee: Plat File No: J4 ��'a�3 -FR Zone Change File No: Zf_"'3 ,7 -62 Plat Name:R.S.air6( 4I Existing Zoning: ' Number of Lots: / L, Date Established: )9'1 /l . Location: Sec. 7.5 Tp25 R flit Advertised Zone Change: 4 `f ": * •rc!` .Sail _ or 1. ar • _ 35 4 Checked by: f . School District: rtac0 v " , . r * 1 fw - Ct 94 % Vein 2 c AetP0 x) --4 V //6/ ea- Date / . /5, Date .4t 40 47( 9,01) 2L1 , 19$2 LN]Wl8bd30 9NINNVId AJ.Nl90 3NVff0ufS ?86L drill 4/16/82 LEGAL DESCRIPTION RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO. 4 The W1 /2 of the NW1 /4 of Section 25, T.25 N., R.44 E.W.M. in the County of Spokane, State of Washington TOGETHER WITH the North 480.00 feet of the West 726.00 feet of the NE1 /4 of the NW1 /4 of Section 25, R.25 N., R.44 E.W.M. in the County of Spokane, State of Washington EXCEPT County road right of way SPOWIE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6� APR 2 3 1982 Prepared For: TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY North 720 Argonne Spokane, Washington 99212 ASV 1 3 1,990 Tupper & Assoc. E. 12929 Sprague Ave. Attn: Ken Tupper cc: Spokane County Planning Dept. cc: Spokane County Engineering cc: Simpson Engineers Effective Date: April 23, 1990 at 8:00 a.m. Order No.: VH Certificate for Filing Proposed: RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO. 4 2ND ADDN. SECOND PLAT CERTIFICATE Charge: Tax: Total: $125.00 9.75 $134.75 In the matter of fhe subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for approval, this company has examined the records of the Spokane County Auditor's and Clerk's offices, and the office of the Clerk of the United States District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount paid for this certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to wit: That portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M. described as follows: BEGINNING at the Southeast corner of Lot 5, Block 4, RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO. 4 - 1ST ADDITION,, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 19 of Plats, page 27; thence the next three courses and distances along the Westerly line of said Ridgemont Estates No. 4 - 1st Addition, North 00 °39'38" East a distance of 286.77 feet; thence North 20 °07'32" East a distance of 73.38 feet; thence North 30 °47'51" West a distance of 125.00 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 4, Block 3 of said Ridgemont Estates No. 4 - 1st Addition; thence North 23 °28'54" East a distance of 80.73 feet; thence North 00 °39'38" East a distance of 212.37 feet; thence South 89 °20'22" East a distance of 218.00 feet; thence South 47 °21'08" East a distance of 67.27 feet; thence South 89 °20'22" East a distance of 500.60 feet to the West line of Ridgemont Estates, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 36; thence the next two courses and distances along said West line of Ridgemont Estates, South 19 °13'09" West a distance of 209.65 feet; thence South 16 °10'39" West a distance of 522.69 feet to the North right of way line of 24th Avenue; thence North 89 °32'42" West along said right of way a distance of 552.57 feet to the point of beginning; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. (continued) VESTED IN: SULLIVAN SOUTH ENTERPRISES, a Washington General Partnership, as to a portion of said Legal Description; and TUPPER & ASSOCIATES, INC., as to the remainder. EXCEPTIONS: A. General taxes, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid Principal Balance 45252.9054 1990 $4463.57 Affects this and other property 45252.9058 1990 $4640.36 Affects this and other property B. Assessment for Road Improvement District No. 38, in the amount of $1505.61 plus interest at 8 %. There is one delinquent installment which was due on April 6, 1989, in the amount of $501.87 plus interest. C. Assessment for Road Improvement District No. 37, in the amount of $824.25 plus interest at 8 %. The next installment is due on April 13, 1991, in the amount of $824.25 plus interest. (continued) Order No.VH- 150657M Page No. 2 -2ND RPT $00.00 $4463.57 $00.00 $4640.36 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: 2. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: AND: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: REGARDING: AREA AFFECTED: (continued) Order No.VH- 150657M Page No. 3 -2ND RPT Spokane County, a municipal corporation Right of way for road for ingress and egress to locate, establish, construct, operate and maintain, repair, and all matters incidental thereto, storm drainage systems, and to cut down and clear away trees, brush, crops and /or debris. 5 ft. on either side of following centerline: Beg. at SW corner of Lot 19, .Block 1, Ridgemont Estates; thence N.89 °32'42 "W. 5.19 ft. to pob; thence N.16 °10'39 "E. 342.16 ft.; thence N.71 °42'35 "W. 2.4 ft.; thence N.2 °07'E. 133 ft.; thence N.11 °05'E. 375 ft.; thence N.17 °20'E. 262 ft.; thence N.28 °34'E. 115 ft.; thence N.34 °33'E. 405 ft. to existing stock pond. December 10, 1975 December 12, 1975 7512120288 Alphons B. Renz and Hilda E. Renz, Indemnitors Spokane County, Indemnitee December 10, 1975 December 12, 1975 7512120290 To indemnify and release the indemnitee from all actions attributable to the indemnitee locating, establishing, constructing, operating, maintaining and all`` matters incidental thereto, the drainage control system in conjunction with Ridgemont Estates. NW1 /4 of Sec. 25, lying NWly of Ridgemont Estates. 3. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: AND: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: REGARDING: 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: Copy attached. 5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: Copy attached. ENCLOSURES: Plat map pds Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington Sullivan South Enterprises, a Washington general partnership, and Alfons B. Renz and Hilda E. Renz, husband and wife September 15, 1988 September 21, 1988 8809210088 Sewerage system Spokane County Sewer facilities A portion of said land September 15, 1988 September 21, 1988 8809210091 Spokane County Sewer facilities A portion of said land September 15, 1988 September 21, 1988 8809210092 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.VH- 150657M Page No. 4 -2ND RPT by UA: i / Vickie Hager, T le Officer For Service on this Order, Call: (509) 922 -2222 7 oo TIMBERLANE 2nd 11-,91 2004,z 1 TIM ERLANE i 1ST 1 ,�. H / RIDGE `EST, / j902 /9961. SUBDIVISION .d- t Y IMPROVEMENT BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that (developer), as "Principal," and (bonding company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of , and authorized to transact a surety business in the State of Washington, as "Surety, are held and firmly bound unto Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, as "Obligee," in the penal sum of Dollars ($ ), lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which the Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, executors, ministrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly y P ad WHEREAS, said Principal is the owner of a tact of land in . SSpokane C , ount 2w� ` divided and platted into lots and known as R►orjrmdAt £,a E .W... and being located in Section 95 , Township ,� S� North, Range �/ . in Spokane County, Washington, and said County has required that a bon T�LLATuN furnished in an amount sufficient to pay the aaas costs of _ . n i,gr. r i t..,. ' all in Improvement Specifications dated satisfaction of the Spokane County not later than extended at the option of the Spokane SIGNED AND SEALED this accordance with those Plat Roadway 11 , 1 9 d , and to the such improvements to be completed , 19 unless said date be , Enginee r, County Upon failure of the Principal to comply with the requirements stated here— in within the time authorized, and upon delivery of a written notice thereof by Obligee to Surety, the Surety shall make satisfaction to Obligee to the extent of this Bond. The obligation of this Bond shall be kept in full force and effect until, in the opinion of the Obligee, the requirements herein stated have been satis— fied, in which event written release will be given by the Obligee, the Obligee having sole right to grant such release. The Surety hereby waives all rights to release from the obligation except as herein stated. day of By: By: Engineer. Principal Surety 19 (Title) o F scti cr 4 -1994 e9 :09 i EI.LER CORPORRTION JAN 1 8 1995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER • Ronald C Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Post -It" brand lax transmittal memo 7671 IN or pages cp. E(k OIV LAP PPone 2 / o Co. Dept Foxr 9 R. From Fax I C, G. ) Sedoewick James of Washington,Inc. W 601 Main Ave. Suite 1400 Spokane,Wa. 99co1 Dear• Sir or Madam: u . r. 9 4 /v /c c is ye .L RE: Ridgemont ESTNTES P1 423A Eller Corporation Please de advised that bored If you nave .any questions. .2g757'?7_1 4 1A ) eP1 / a N D CO27 ,U ccr # //6 -Gy37 - 3/9 [. r Hato /a/ a c.vt m tr .4 Coe` O< r r c. csran a .rI. c no 4 TN / s. 7H ,4 A i/ /dO 1�26 W.9toaaway Mt. • Spoka■e,NNA99260.01 • (5091 &96.3600 C O LJ IV T A ✓I V LS1ON OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director No 4, dnd Add very truly yD F. el September 1, 1994 SEDGWICK SEP C 6 199h SPOKANE Number ti 723.13 issued by Safeco Insurance Co. of America as surety for installations of roads and associated drainaoe facilities for the above mentioned plat, dated January 11, 1991, in the current amount of $7.400.00 may now be reduced to 4a,tR00.00 (two thousand U.S. dollars). feel free to call our office Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. . Sack:ane Coenty Engineer Oavid A. Nertc Peat Compliance -:,urveycr E AX'. (509132% -3 + • t VO l- ,t,y,1 3v.-aloo 7 1 - 4- 1•?:la Ii ; 1T -1 SAFECO To be attached to and form a part of Type of Bond: Bond No. dated effective executed by and by SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA (SURETY) In favor of SPOKANE COUNTY tOBUGEEI In consideration of the mutual agreements herein contained the Principal and the Surety hereby consent to changing THE BOND PENALTY From' T 5672333 CLLCr rr rMI I 1..11 I SUBDIVISION ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT BOND 12 January 11, 1991 (MONTH. DAY. YEAR) ELLER CORPORATION (PRINCIPAL) SEVEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED AND NO/00 - -- 57,400.00 TWO THOUSAND AND NO /00 -- Nothing herein contained shall vary, alter or extend any provision or condition of this bond except as herein expressly stated. This rider is effective September 9, 1994 (MONTH. DAY. YEAR Signed and Sealed September 9, 1994 (MONTH, DAY. YEAR) Eller Corporation SURETY RIDER Lois Stewart PRINCIPAL I TITLE SURETY ATTomeev.IN•FACT SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA FIRST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA HOME OFFICE' SAFECO PLAZA SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98185 $2,000.00 r.7L as Principal. as Surety, TOTAL P.02 • Y PLANNING REPORT - AUGUST 22, 1985 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF RE: EXTENSION OF TIME for PE- 1423 -82, RIDGEMONT ESTATES #4 ZE- 32 -82, Agricultural to R -1 I. GENERAL INFORMATION Sullivan South Enterprises 928 -1991 E. 12929 Sprague Avenue Spokane, WA. 99216 - 5 - Inland Pacific Engineering 535 -1410 S. 25 Altamont Spokane, WA 99202 Location: Located adjacent to and bound by 16th Avenue, Sullivan Road and 24th Avenue in the Spokane Valley in Section 25 Township 25N, Range.44.E.W.M., Spokane County. Proposal: The sponsor is requesting a time extension for one year of the approved preliminary plat to divide 125 acres into 284 lots for single family dwellings. II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION A. Site Size: 125 acres; 284 units were approved B. Comprehensive Plan: Suburban C. Background Information: This proposal was granted preliminary approval by the Hearing Examiner Committee on July 27, 1982, to divide 125 acres into 284 lots. D. Planning Department Summary: Due to progress being made, approval is recommended for one year to September 1, 1986. If approval is granted, those conditions as listed in the July 22, 1985 Staff Report and July 27, 1982 Addendum are recommended together with updated Utilities Department conditions. E. Spokane County Utilities Department Updated Conditions: 1. The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuatnt to RCW 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW 36.94." 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Connection is to be made to an interim public sewer. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer connection are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. S 25 \GIVhcu- UiSCUSS NJ-eel cca- ?ab c Sewer be (oae ?I Ct Yn Ptaoceed'# EXIQ-0side- C\'tS Ct-lS 5 GI" e�jG -Q -�'. irL GXT -evt_S i°-, o.�' S ecu ei at** rice-eAt et -Q-A '- Go “Th A V li-czcE- V4,. pzzoVt:=sF=3-le Z . Cc'r • tut e‘?-- - at E 2_ 1 0,4 5 ew ex -p t obkevn4 - ZE -32 -82 AGRICULTURAL to R -1 -SPONSOR: 928 -1991 SURVEYOR /ENGINEER: 535-1410 Sullivan South Enterprieses Inland Pacific Engineering E. 12929 Sprague Avenue S. 25 Altamont Street Spokane, WA 99216 Spokane, WA 99202 LOCATION: The proposal is located adjacent and bound by 16th Avenue, Sullivan Road and 24th Avenue. COMPREBENSIVE PLAN: SUBURBAN (Sullivan Road is "transition" between URBAN and SUBURBAN.) PROPOSAL: The sponsor proposes to divide 139 acres into 285 single - family residential lots; lot sizes ranging from 10,000 sq.ft. up to 1+ acre lots. The existing Agriculutral zone is proposed to be changed to R -1 for the 139 acres, except lots 35-40 and 42 -45 of Block 10 which are proposed to be Agricultural Suburban zoning. \ ' , 7 ILa 6,00 • E . cayr \t° K thy, 0, 8 Uva - s - ; DRAINar MW UTILITY LASIIIII(T e / 0 ,,C3 • 1.7- / 4., r . . A • p I ' ; 6` ;co? ;at/ • • s e : • • As .',.e. .-ry ,,,/' die s : ../4'7<- : • • ": • : /04, .0 a -- g.„,.; • -<._ N • *.;',/ ... ;;,,,,, on v. v • 'ay \ : i . ... .. .... ;1 ‘..,, :. • lad NASA MW e . i e • :‘ ' N. : UTILITY tAIIMIAT ,‘ I , ./ ...„, , 0 , : 0 ‘• ,,, ' ! ' ' Z.9/ ; ..(B• r f e . :. 1;7 ,f 1 ;, • ... ... ,,, . ..,,, I P.. I I 1 2 ''' • , \ . ", •-•.. ', / ■ ... ^7 7\ N . vt t5 Z A! • ' 1 0 N I ... re. z : , y • . r. • A t . i A lb S *ma • Q )1 ite 6n4 an. CO iV :his survey • (1,/ 14. used for H C• co ( s : `— : ;•: • =41, . c) ; X • B ER, N 35 42.65 • IN RP N46 , 4 6,93 • :BBB N 69 ; ; • 1 . . --1518.35-- • I ••• 8 ;.E 22 .;...'.4218 • . • . ; J • i • ;:;; •; :111 altotil 1;"'“,•• .'; ; • ; ;.; -: ! • ;-!;. ;,. ri ' .; ;, IC . : : : • . . : •. . i I 30; I 1 ' .1 j : . ..I . 0 . 11 i • P), , : ._• • : • 1 1 0 i i•• • • co , • 1...1..::::. . • . ; ; • ! • 1 .1 ._ . ; . : : . . • i . ' 120,00 ' 140.00 Ve :: •crt.4Z *••• ;;;•2 5-1,1.0 STRIP S89°20 ! '• Ng9 3P.1'2 H V. I CH • •.; • '' • . • I ' • .24 ih sesozlalle ;. :.7.7187,14), 7; ; • ;!;1 : lEGEND: 1 1 I .E.L.c.c)• 25 as. 1 ' • VI , \ sy$ i ofi:** : • ,..• ,,, ...,..- I t ' ; • 4-.1 - ...--'‘.\ c o \ . %;\ A . • . I NI'DRAINAOIE • \ 1 H ,, ...... 0 UTILITY t : '....„ , . EASEAIDIT i . i t.' i . / I t , 1 7 \.. ,.,, • il wtm . 1 0 ‘ Aki:1 1 :` Th i • • ;a ! . .4, .4 ,.. • , ,, . t.• . 1,, . 40 . •..., . i . . 4 : . . vi • . . — / f4i ., , • • 6 ..• .4 • H i • ' seN• ! a- a • .• • ,. „..r , o- ' :.: , I. •Nt _ 1. .: / :•:. • ..: • . • • l 4 • . / a` • • 4 ''•••• • • "--... 6 t : .4 / • • ( • : : ... ; --, --. - • -- ': ' . : ' : , . . 1 --- . cg‘/• . . :: • -- • cpe : • .-.. I . • , . •, i , 13 DRAINAOE It UTILITY I • v : ; .. H "••• ! : , EADebtVf." • • • : ', • bt! : . , .. , .. • !' .0 t* 1 • • " . ' • • 1 . ' 12 • •• ! • : . 0, : : • ' g tcj : . . . • . ;• clo o "? . ".• . ! : • 1 1 • • ' A. " •) 0 . .... • i' • cs, ;, '. ' .; i:•! 1 I - . .... to . ..C.... P:.: . : : . •..' .., ... ...:, t> .. • : • 00 V, ` (RI - 1- • Kt, 292.57 1 1 : DRAIMMIE AND • UTILITY Dna • 52.57 I . \ FOUND 1;1! -24 ni r N 9 442 -"O 04001. z.5 I 2: Esz • 2 I r- 1 d • 24TH AV VI i 02 4-.....S" 4 1 'Q' C C ?- ■9: /,‘. i AL r 0, 19 0 / A Q7 00 I. / 491 2 5 /3. 91"7/ T 81 4' ar,/, --- N C 16° Rt. L- 160.2 A 36.0 4: A 30 • 1 0° It- .T 157.5' L 307.3' s P—Lat 201:11k 1 b, 7 9 ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION LOCATION UNITS QTY. QTY. TO DATE INT. FVi f} ^r csL- 7/1.7/90 nk Mandrej( 9/2.07/91 QA TV Lr sm � Rcr b# , / 51 OFFICE late IL/ 167,91 . spector 51 Weather a m Time Charged Contractor this Day - 1 /2 or 1 Other County Personnel Diary Section 1) k \ Signing checked am pm Jr:1(4a 1 2 3 4 5 6 a- 2_C, -c)333 Jaw) L,sf 2_2C - j 3 — " jca r REPORT pg 1 of 1 OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER p.m. rJr?vh? Rr ncJS � / u H ) 7 TvrsreeLn i rnh' Seu.tn (il„a Project Name Project No. CRP /RI Report No Contractor and /orSub(s) Eller R.lrnn 7spA.i1* Equipment List LA AI rn/ ap,.0 c6 ninrre6e. re ,v,li %vl 4 f‘. 5 /.[P t „,-,11‹.. 'WZOoo°_. INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE ;nrn&..iii C)r .1 lc en-70)T ' 5s `( - L-( 4,11, Hrs. Used Standby Contractor Personnel Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 [01/4Q t2— Number Ij 3 ) F 1]N Piu, ,, Sids lk ,m 7h6 Ca 6.4.5: .Av ueecb2 A9 .egtitzen7'_4,95 ,ePd / �rc Pes -uA Play o% R icicieeMo,J� _ Es ! . - T`iE - rczssu� Jd 2115.(9± e ,YS, y to // ,etiee re #ffrcxa rm? / -_ i zSO _41zer_y y4 - - -- - - D.MI_ titip5_CA- D t') 7 ,vdct_iteoAf4 /L c / , oc25455 freeing; c o,v 6'-r / eAv ,.A4/ 6c a 'v /4 ',Awe/ - - 24 "I Ava/vUes b� #16car 3 5_ _ria_ caiv.r -_ p -- - 5tt6_57A — H it toc \Jo -trac G t.o 1\ Cr /10. _QCCNr /_G 72 _A.ed - -- Tin Yw - r ti -- F o itirk \---- A. V.eause.. 'ivy _cam.. -4-) +,__k.9l0(e F P -- ccilec7o2 51 Reef kJhl c h pIa /5.- off_-- Z24 _ 77,.zzd_c_rL_/a E_._ psi J --- Z�cr77ovv-T_A'S o vd i'dfennw re5 N 2_ __ Rya i_5_ - an ACC e -9__ 55T i5 3o CF, i __u.4d-Lh. -8 aces._- eo_rci6aaf 1 c €e Try as t /1 As _Lt.- Aalrieta.- 01 Sa7 -Ed race — _ au-ha-Li Sec* ionl N6- �__- 6cc5_fz SrA/r'/A2 -- h A3 be-e -a es 5 tacdec( bt1 >n °((Arr � y »uee r 114c_ /6- 7 _ ... 1_7 2 rte._ -2h Alb' /:c sv.%/ 6 . s rz G o.VSTr?4LC.kt •, - .e_ - -Sou (- 5/2E_ a � 11-*_ -- f �, , _ .51 --- - — - -1 _ o•�— Srd,/ /u,vive i9a? TA_7 7ylA7 5_u / / /v. i6, _eici_s?e?, — - - — al a6 — pifc en/eV _Z - _CGL!_'f'ES_S 70- 4.-- teo_ -t{ #c6, t cy'vNe_a /fccomcdA7; e. � ? A •_ as,_ / - - - - onele .2.— f'a_- A_fGoYr/e /__5h -..._ h1 4N Ad1 /f /tut/ 35_-t f'_ 9176 /770 -i6, 57.7 7`P5 ,E76 iyz- 4 2, aJl in edic, te 4 z. enty 1, nic• T l CslJ_ ci, //. &e x/ /5 745 cohLah hog 5 1.E_C__o%ss _v e by S — ta v ey -co_2 7* __s / /!_/ p /629• iE Alz / /ca az/ // tic Ages ,02-7s/ "A/e ' z th / A i/r/ n c Silsre f £ /r I al � GGI % ILG�� 7 Ef��c 406; c�Aa hoizak/cS Z* UX?.t%eal- r► L January 15. 1991 Mgr. Ronald Hormann Sookane County Engineer North 811 Jefferson Spokane. WA 99260 Dear Mr. Hormann: It is mutually •agreed that .funds for work completed will be released in the following_ order: Se) [,wee.a - z/'- 1/e 1. Work completed by the funds set aside by Capital Source. Eller Coporation's bond for the sewer improvements. _. Eller Corporation's bond for the drainage work. 4. Savings set aside by Tupper & Associates for sod. Thank you for your attention to this Tatter. Kenneth J. Tuo Tupper & Associ es Date Charles Elle_ Jr. Date Eller Corporation NaTi c E theRe AQE Rock SUMp fike.ons z4TM wti;ch Receivti toyw\ bTEt &o%& Co 12 4 4 - VA Sulu bi we rgasttae: Co tasaidey arkese iu Disseitale CPACOAlichOS FY l Plat 7 / 2 3I kZ /K Cl stota,_,4 c& I 3 1(a - 5gsI a °iL • —la 25 ' TH AVE 44 NE I/4 25 - 25 -44 182.20 136. z3 /76. / 205.99 72.10 180.3 14.0 1 33.85 1 30•54 Izo.7z 103.72 /33,07 /48, /3.5.41 Not Platted Not Plotted 133.3o 14,0 /5/-49 94, L14 81 14 ) 343.0.5 PROPERTY OF SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR /'G T I M6ERLANE 1ST - ,1 25 —44 2 8. 7/ 27 " 887.67' 82'7. 52' 3404' =MOW SPnilt ,3 z O. • 701. 35 /320 a 0 • 9 • ..r uo» t21T) EMOUT ESTATES WE. 2 (5" 12 DIA. 014..PIPE t21DGIEMOWT EST7aTE$ U D12YWELL MAA11-OLE, CATGM /bA IIJ OQ Cv 1.11 - TELL ILJLET STORM SEWEt2 EA.SEMEIJT STORM SEWEGL PIPE bcc=$ gut) of PIPE 5EC.25, T2514. 1244E.W.M. °IST. 04 re SEC 25.T25.N.R.44E Sc A L E 1 4OOFT -� Q Q CJ ti- r, . a . J I .g_3) ® 4 /6 (Tf � C,V so • ES r.I B � ' ivo:' 2�49G-'S0' J '• w' �`v) 26 J 1 I G ^� S: c ,I /v 89 ° 23' /7 " - 2E 10.52' ( - J ! \ 3! I/�- 7 . ▪ 425' TEP.ITION 1 / POND II 6 a � SITE <, 5 VI III / l44 I A n / . 1/ . 1./h LS '25 °38 C16 °Rt. T81.4' L 160.2' 24TH AVE. Jo• " No. ¢i - p DATE 6— /5— 72 A 30 44' C 10° Li. T 157.5' L 307.3' - Lo120,BIk 1 Lea r ai OK aJ 389 °5 - CE LJ ESCR /AT /ON (Gov7- ?63 DRIVE 25 30 0 36 31 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Sullivan South Enterprises, a Washington Partnership and Tuer caused to be platted into lots, blocks and s streets s the l land shown ., have hereon as "RIDGEMONT ESTATES No. 4 - 2nd ADDITION" and described as follows: That portion of the NW 1/4 of Section 25, T. 25 N. R. 44 E.W.M. described as follows: Tupper & Associates Inc. Kenneth J. Tupper, President DEDICATION Begin at the Southeast corner of Lot 5, Block 4, RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO. 4 - 1ST ADDITION as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 19 of Plats, page 27 in Spokane County, Washington; thence the next three courses and distances along the Westerly line of said Ridgemont Estates No. 4 - 1st Addition, N 00 ° 39'38 "E a distance of 286.77 feet; thence N 20 ° 07'32 "E a distance of 73.38 feet; thence N 30 ° 47'51 "W a distance of 125.00 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 4, Block 3 of Said Ridgemont Estates No. 4 - 1st Addition; thence N 23 ° 28'54 "E a distance of 80.73 feet; thence N 00 ° 39'38 "E a distance of 212.37 feet; - thence S89 ° 20'22 "E a distance of 218.00 feet; thence S 47 ° 21'08 "E a distance of 67.27 feet; thence S 89 ° 20'22 "E a distance of 500.60 feet to the West line of Ridgemont Estates as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 36 in Spokane County Washington; thence the next two courses and distances along said West line of Ridgemont Estates, S 19 ° 13'09 "W a distance of 209.65 feet; thence S 16'10'39 "W a distance of 522.69 feet to the North right of way line of 24th Avenue; thence N 89 ° 32'42 "W along said right of way a distance of 552.57 feet to the Point of Beginning. Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. The public water system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building and Safety Department, and water within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will individual domestic a domvsyor, we be sery instal as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each issuance of a building lot. g permit for No more than one dwelling unit shall be placed on any one lot , nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without first filing a replat. Individual driveway access permits will be required prior to issuance of approaches to the County road system. a buildin g permit for driveway The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 31.94 which the petition includes the owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a formation of a ULID by resolution method protest petition against the s property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibitRthe Cowner( s) 6or4successor (s)afromt7ob ' ection(to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. Lot 5 Block•1 as shown hereon is dedicated to Spokane County to be deeded for forever at such time as adjacent property is platted. road purposes Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. The plattor does hereby dedicate forever the streets shown hereon for public road purposes. Utility easements as shown are hereby granted. Direct access to 24th Avenue from lots is prohibited. A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and indi service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or otherwise service the private roads contained within or provide service to the property described in this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a buildin road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said g permit to be issued on property on a private that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature owners ato t establish, he examine, survey, acknowled construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain or provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner(s), their heirs, successors or assigns, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. The private road, as shown hereon, is an easement which provides a means of ingress and egress for Lot 3 and Lot 9 of Block 2 and is subject to the seperate DECLARATION OF COVENANT as recorded reference is made a part under Document No. which by Drainage - easements, as platted and shown hereon, which are for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted. The County of Spokane is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all drainage easements adjacent to the public ri ht -of -wa swale with. a permanent live cover of lawn turfy ° with hoptionaltshr bberyhand /orltrees,twhichrdonnot obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage swale as indicated by the approved plans. The property owner or his representative shall inform each succeedin easements on the property and his responsibility for maintaining drainage facilities a within al said easements. Individual driveway access permits shall be required prior to issuance of a building approaches to the County road system. Driveway approaches g t ru c t e for accordance with the approved e o shall be constructed in access lid allowed_ a cross; the' 9_ fo tlWide the County Engineer's the 'With she -- . oun � p a file Engineer. No 1 drainage on i e n f. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set our hand and affixed my seal this ,1991 day of aft Sullivan South Enterprises Kenneth J. Tupper, Managing Partner Xa02B. OM IPA = ' rte .�. _ sp Rova. SUPERIOR REPROGRAPHICS TB-344 2033.0 2, "" °A -WN zz PONSOR S ULLIVAN SOUTH ENTERPRISES EAST 12929 SPRAGUE AVENUE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99216 928 - 1991 ENGINEER INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. SOUTH 25 ALTAMONT STREET SPOKANE WASHINGTON. 99202 535. -14.1 T E DATA TOTAL ACREAGE - 88 ACRES 2 12: LOTS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE M INIMUM LOT SIZE 12,500 SQ. F T. T YPICAL& MINIMUM FRONTAGE 100 FT. at building setback line) S EWAGE DISPOSAL- INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC TANKS AND DRAINFIELD (interim systems) This map was prepared by me or under my direct supervision in April, 1982, in conformance with the requirements of : the Spokane. County Subdivision Ordinance. CEM7RAL1 VALLEY 1 H /GH 1 "; _ SCHOOL ) AYE •o: aassa V Mica: 371d0ad NIIIIIIMI=ems MINMNIMINIMIIMI MIMI MIIIIMMIMMINMIMININEMINIMIN=1=11=1111MINIMI MIIMINIIIMINENIIIII MIIIM MI= MIN•111 M111111111111 dMI11111 N111111=1111111111====l1111 NIIIIIMINIMIN■— INIIM =111111111111=11= oM MUM ■1& I MIIINIM=IIIIIIII MI1111111 MINE NM= = MIIIIIIIMINMNIIMII5 e■IIMINI MINIIIII N— �� ®��■— 1111111■ m�� . i : - 1.•. U— = 0� MMIIIIIMEMINIMMIIIIIIIIIIINEENIMM mmIIImmimimmmm■ NIIIIIIIIIIIMINNIMINNEMEININIEN �I� �I�� 1. fi �M — . - - �■ r IIINIMMINWINIIIMEMIIIIIMIIIMIEMINN �� i__ii__ =MP 11%11= 1111111111111MNI11111111 MIMI EMU IM -, — =� �iA�■ MIIIIIMMEMENININI NMIIIIIIIINMINI MINI NIIIIIIN MEN MN= MMII —w— L! �� ■�� _p L - M■ MINIM= 1111M11=111=1=M= NIMIIIIIMMEMI MOM MIME , 4 4 C•?i� =��MM 11111=1 MUM MIIIMIMMININ MIMI MEM MN= Wil _MMu ��O'MM— MIMI NIMINIIMMNIIMMIIIIMMMIIIIINIMMIr ® r�� E�� = Immisli /�� memo moms MIME MIIIIIIMINNII MUM MIMINIMMIIIINN loom miummi■■■■11p.mmi M��I� ✓��... 1. �ii� �di�� N �■ �.■� ■�� . r..en �.�■��■� m�� um= NIM �NV�II�IMMIN�. NIMI IIMs�� — — — I/—M�� ' - -� - - � �w /.��4�� vIP��■� �� MINIMMEIIIMM ■� ■�M ®IIIMEM ��M��■��=11 =1 � �� tl�� NIIIIIIMIIMINMIN MIIIIMMI1111 MINN =MIN , ��IV`�� SCI_ �� e�� /��eM�� MIMI WAIIIINIM IMINNE MNEMMINIIM MINN �� - ��■ — ��MIMI ��.� -- r.�o�s [��0�� I �DN��S��ry� ■� m �� _ � 4 r�C�R/NEN MEIN Noy ��I�wIN�f "��MINN �� i��/L�iih!�� IMIIIIIN ��3�__ ��' ►� C�� MINI /�%iJI (rte �ws IMr4' �r� ��r� — �� Mug '� ��MsIV /11 �■��a��■ EINIMII E-MI�� ® �� MIMI MINIM �� O�� ' I� M��® �� ME MINIM =moms MINIIIINM IMMII MEN NIMEMIIIIIIIIII M _ ■ mmil �� ®.1111111111 SIM11111=: Oe MMIIIMMINININMIMIIMNIMINNIIINN IMMIMININIMMINNUNM MI= MIIINP IMMIIIIIMIIIIIIIMIlli r m INNIMMIMEne ..... E=MIM1 1.1.71..... - MIIMM MM. MIIIIMMIMINMIMINIMIIIIIIMIENI IMEGMMMIZIMIIIMMI MIME GZEMEKEINEMNIMI I MIMMENNIMINNINN — — � �1� � ® �� M�.1111111 MIMII MEINININNEN IIIIMMM NMI =MI NIMMIIIMMIIMMIIIII=1111===111 MMIIINIMMIINNIM MINI M1111=1111111.111111.1111111.1 =MOM MIIIIMIN NINIMMIMMI NIIIINIMMIIIIMEN MINI ININIMNIMENNIMN INIIMN W M111.111111.1." IMMNINI =UM NIIIIIIMI=M MIMEO= MIMINNEMN �� I� �e e� MEM IINIMEI �� ® �� NOMMEN _ ■ —� —fie MEIMIIIIMINNINNIMINIMIIIM MEM MIIMMINIIIMIMIMMIIIM MINI IIMINNIIMMINIIIIIMI MININIMINIMMININNIMINIIIIIMMIIIIINN IMIIMINNNMMNNIIMNINIINIM IMIMIM MEM EMMIMIIMINMIMMINIIIII=IIMNIMM=111111M=IIMINIMM a.....M.1...11111==.1.=.11.111111...1=.1.11111.1.111.1.....11.11.1111111.1.1111...Mal...117111...1.11.1.1111 MIIIMINIMMIIIIIIIM MEN MIIIMNI �II �� •�� miN111111 MEM W IMIIIIIIMIIMIllial 01,1=1111 MIMI __111___ - =111111=MIMMI MOM IIIIIIMMININI IIIMINMEMNIMMIIMINIMNIMMIN NIMINIMINN �� ME= MI MIN A NI■■E �i ■� B EM ® ■�� ■�� ■ ■� �■��a �� ■ �� MEM MEN MINIM= MININIMINIM MINN NMENII MIIIIIMMENNIM MM. MMNINN MINN =ME �� ■m■��r_�■ soli �■ ��MIIII=NIMMI �1111=111I MINI MIIMNI 111111111111111111111 MEIN MEM 111111111111111111111111111111111 ®11=1111111 11111111111111 amilmmummuniumnimmommINNININ ®INIIIIIIII NM =MEE =MI N111111111111111111 MINIIMININIIIII =NM IIIMINIIIIIIMIN M11111111111=1111111 =MOM 1111=11111 MINIONININININNEININNINIII 11111111M1 NMI 11111111111111110111 111111111111 MIIMMEMMINIIIMINIIII NIIIINIMEN=111 = 111111111=111•1111111111111111111 MINIM 1111111111111111=111111111111111 MIMI 111•11111Mm==111NIMINIMIMININIONIN 11•1111•11 d MIMMERE MI' MIME MINNINNIM MEN .......moNINNIEMMIll= MEN MIN MIIINIMIMEMMINIMMIM m.......iniammtmunimmm ••••• milimin....==.... Z . Z . IMMINI .N.10 1111=NME MIIMI NINIMMII■ MM.M MIMMIMIMINI MMIMM = MIIMMIMINIMIII IIIIIII IMIM MIMIIMilliMIMIIIII =111111111M = E 1.11111111 MININMINIMMEINNIMINIMMEI 11111=1111 =INN 11=1111111=111111111 0111111111111101=1 MINN IAN= 11111111111111111111111111111111111==11=1 =111111N MINN 1111111111111 11111111111=11111111 =INN 1111=111=111111111111 NIIIIIIN 11111111111=1111111 111=111111=1111•1111111111=1111111111111=11111111=111111111 =OM IIIIIIIIII INIIIIINIENIIIIMMIINIIIIIINIIIMIIIIINIMIIIIIIINIIIIIINIIIIIIINIIM MIEN MINN MINN EMMEN= MINI= _- o a- o -y�� MINIKEINININIMM MINIM= NEMIN MEM N1111111111111111=11 111111111111 91700 ld 8d/10 30 d01 05-03- 5170E d33NION3 • .1/ LL( i -3 03/1Ob'dd b 4 ' Nor 03A3/12111S 'HS6'M '..1NnOO 3N6')lOdS 2133NION3 LLNn 30 301.430 Hl t a ` "da V e/ONOS 10 NOd3141VO 179Z '0N '1.01aLS10 1N3I Oval 9 Std 183Mn2 9no - 3 N ca o-L 3r\ t_L •C a boz \ • o—L L h•W - S 'z-ti -1-7z - b1G NOIiOnd1SNOO 39VNltyY0 7VIO3dS SIHi NO S71 11130 clod 'ON 133HS 33S GO +£Z 01 81+00'V.S :310N ,9= „l 143/1 s05 = 'd OH 371/0 t`1 \ LV - (2;• - "1 �3NMO 1 -LS 1•)C ,� ,� •� ,,�� r =v tx � �s yoc ,L'liII -_LsN•= S\ ±z ' • ds s 3 ISS .I , - fiL. - OZ 7\ 'a S 4_1._. 5 2A MO ' \ \• W' • LS \y.� Lst- rc�<t Lam I •dJ..s '3/16' H1 PO b0'3NV7d38fN11 30 '2/00 »i's IV . 0V.1/ £12z n0 30 0N3 IS 3A1 NO ,; +„ 917 ' ETOZ ;1373 - LS1 7`3 LS rad s zL + ' ( • b L S 1...w.4-1,z3, tV0\1- 'v' - L1Nd S o i S'3t�N c radcld os_ sd X::;•C3 — b �6 eS•t' ' �113 7d�i�to� d -LX3 • a1_51 -L Z1 -- 6\ DVS- 30 -7n0 3O 1O31N30 S3n0 ,d0 dot 1(108V NO1i11/1373 3QVel9 ' Y3SI2I '3731 V - 773MA2J0 1Ond1S gYn0 10n2/1 SNOO 82I 110 ONl1SIX3 == == 0N3O37 'OI +LI d1S lb' 8dnO 9NI1SIX3 133141 01 3NI78df O NO 1NIOd 379Nt> 1,?:1 00 +91 'VlS g&L NOLLIGOV 3NV7838W11 •W M 3 t ' Y N g? 1 g? •o3S •V• $Z3 • .1_SN.CD2 OZ'8L 9 LZ'6 : 00'S = 3/16' Hl17z - 8'01-1 NVAI77fS 30 - d00 Al 'N 370d 213MOd NI 3)I /dS 77VINS 90 %1373 fN'8 DVS- 3Q -7nO .. ........................ dpi x • z1.1.,sNcY7 .......... ............................... ocoz 18 88110 3O do1 0£0Z 37/30dd 7831N30 5003 O2OZ 17 8dno did - Its 0 rim -4 • C c C a [n m m 2 = z v O � v 0 z N rn m z. z 0 p 7c nn vm gOIE 16 geino Jo do °Hz 3NI 761 gOIE '1_7 wino 2'O doi NEININEMME MIMI MINE MIMI MOM IIIIMEMMIN ANIMEIMNIMMIIIIIMIIIIIEMMIM IMIEMMIIMMIIMIMIIMIII NEINEWANNEINIE MIIIIMININIIIIMEE EMMA M MEM MIMI MIMI MIME _ MAE MIIMI I= MMIINMENIMI MANE w— MIIIIMMAIII MIE =MIIIME= 11/AEIM MEM I/A■ MIME EMINIEM111111 IIMMEMMINII ME= MEM MENIM■MMIIIIII MEM MIMIEMIIM MOEN IMEWA MEM IA mom MIMI MEM IMMEMINIMMEM11 MAE %YAM MO MEM 4MINIMENIIIMEIMIEI wMIII YAIIIIIIE FAINMEMEME IMMIMMIENN MIMI NOMMEN = IIIIIIIIIMI111= MN= = M MEIMMII =ME EWAN ammummilmo mow wriAmmommommIIMINI %MENOMINEE M E M IME I NEMMEMINIM IMMEMIMINEIMEE= MMIMI MIME EIIINEEEEINEM NIMENNIEMI EIIIIIELIMININ EMMA IMAM MAIEN =MEM IMM41 MIME MEM IMAM MUM IMM E EI IMMEIMINEENIMININME=IMMINIEMEIMAMII IIIMMINIIMIE ,, EMEMMIIMAMMII ■... IM LIMEMINEMI MINIM MM MIIIIIMENINNIMMIMA MIIIMIMEIN MIMI EINEIIIIIIMEMEN2WA MEM MIIIIMENEMEMEIN %ME EWAN MIII/M1 MAIMMINENI WZAMM IEMNIM WAIIIIM MIME NIMIIIMAINNE EIMIIMPAMIEIE I MEIN = IIIIII Nam= == TeltI&M. AII i • kilEU M NMI — A- * = EIMMITIN 1.111=1=II IMIIMMII1== : MEI IIM 'ilEmmINI MOM 1110111M111111M11111 4.1EMEE ME - UNIMININIIIICIIIIMMINIENE MEM MIEENIMEMI NW rild Mr a MIMI all.11.1111. AIIIMINEMIEMMEINIEM NEMAMMNI mist ilmw4rammm isiwmpi 5remmirms IMAIIMINIIIM IMMENEAMI A IMIIIIMMIEMEIMIMMEN= KIWIIM =,... = MINIM f111111111ENEMME 111%.1111` IMINEEI IIIMINEINIMEMIZIEMIMINI IMENIIMMENIMMIIM Mt :11111:1111111M.M m rammm... =ME= =1M== Nolml ......= cam. 7T= MM IMINNEE mom Immingrwmm KrAMINM ww...1= Ma.....M. Fl6n11111MIIMLIMPIEEMI■ ME 111WIM6141111.1MM r.amommi wrowlmou PrAmmeim ImmorAimmommitammaramempr WANE EIIIIIMEIMMANIIMMIIIIIIIIMINWIEN 1 1 1 1=MIR:MIINA l &TAWM=.1= 11.1.1. 11E MilirAllini MIME I IIIIIMEIIMINIIM== WAIIIII FAME IIIIIIMMEMMENIEMSUIPMINIIII IIIMMIUMMEMIENIO MMIIIII IIMENNUMEM MEM NOWA! ==11=niminalliiiIIIIIM=IMIIII■.- - 1INIMIIIIIIMMINIIMM 111•11AMMAINMEMMEMMINEEMI IMINIE11%111M EIMMIMIIIIIMII=IENIME NEMMI v__ INIIIIIIIIIMINIMIIMIMMIIIIMEIMINENE111111ENNEMIIIMUMMINEM M MIME MEM M411112! i MIME miiil_ I IMMINEEMMINEKIMMEMENN IIIIMINIMANNOI MINMAIIIIIMENIEEM MIMI= IMEINENIMINEIMIIIIIIIMIW=111114/1111111 INENNIE ME N M EMNIEMEMI 1111111111 IMINEE IMEIMIIINIIIMMOIMJEm I IMAIIIIMIIIIIIIIMIA 121=11111110111111M EMINEFAM11111 MIE, 011% , I MEM •JI MINVAMINEE MAIM MIIMEIMAIIIIMMENBEEEN EINIMEMIIIIIIMMEM MAIM MEINEMEM11/■11111111M = MIMMIMININMEMIIIMAIIIIIINIMIIIIIIIIIINIEM/A111111111141/ - MIME MAINMEMIMINEW/EMEIMEINIIIIMIlliiill EllIMI MIMI MINEMMIIIIIIIIIMINEMEMINEMINEEEM MIMI WAMIEMIIIIIIMINIVAMEIMINEEMEIMIAMMI MEM IIIIIMEMMIIM MIME MIIIV/A IMIIIMIMAIIE CO =EINEM I BIMINI IIIMIIIEM111111111 r"4 MOM RUM I I MO I G I /7/A I I M I MEW V■IIIE MIII. • MINE WIIIMPAI MAIM MINIMAMMEINI MEM MN= "MAI /AMMO MMAINIMINIIIIIIIMEE MINIMMINIMM IIIIM=IIMEMI LIMIIIIM IMALIMMIM MOM M IIIIIM I MEM MAIM MEE IMAIIMITEIMENIMMI VA MIMI MI111111 IMENII MEM MY MMINEININEDIMMIMI MIIMMIll ammi M IIMINIM=1 EINEM MIMI EMIIIII 11111111H WM mom IMIt IMIIIIIPW MEW - __ 0I I= = PEMENIIIIIIINEMEMI= VI I M M ERE CM IMEM ...11/4111111111./4 MIME .ANINMEMI ENNIMUIMMZEMENEEME NINMENIIIMEE MEM MINIF/AAWINA IMICIIIIMEEM MEM 1111111MLIMEMI MIME IIIMEMENHNIIIIMINIMMEI MEMO MIIMEIMINIIIMMOINIM EFAMIIIIIMENEMIMEIMIMM MIIIIIMIIMMII =M ENIM111:11111EINIMMIll =EZZOIll rANIMIIMIMM EMIR MNEIMINIPMEMMII = .1..Pil EIMINMEINIM MIMI == MEM M NUMMI WIMAIIIIMMININ I X I NY A •11111111=1161•11MA111111WMIN MEE MAE IMEIIMMEMIIIIIEWAMMEMEMEMILI MEM /AMIE IIIIMAIMIIIIIIIIMMIN _I_ IONNIMEEEVE EMMILAMMIL9M %ME IMINIMMIIIIME MEIMMEMENSI ■AIMMI MUM INIIIMEME11#11111MME mommusiiii I Ms MIMIIrrMNIMMMIIIInla.lrqabtlIl 0) ■ MIMIR = MIMI MIIIMINMENI /M avola Isrmio MIIIIMI/110111• OM ,Fam MOM M IIIICMIMI EMI% = SIM% MEM mdmonsammitimomonsmi ENEMA MINE1=10111MIIIIENIMMMIIM VAEMIIIIMMEN MEM AMENIMMIll EINIMIVAIDEIMAMEMM EIE1111111111111MENIIIMENTAFE MIIIMUNIMEINIMIENIIMEIMIEIMMINEEIMMIIIE IIIINEMENNINEMINEIE=MIIINIIMMEEMINMEM11111 IM MEM MIRIMIMIIMME AIMIIIINEMIMMIMNIMMEMINIE M MIIIIIIIII III MLA MIMI MEM101 M 41M111111,1=1 ;EMMA M ENWIf IRIMMI IIIIIIIIMIE MAIM I= MIEN m F r•M" pi= Os 111:1111111EtallEILAIN" ‘11.:111111E111111MME1 060E 18 881)0 JO d 0 9600 "3/11Y0 JO ,9 3 AO 14 I 3 el • Y 0 V Y ONOS '8 •3111/ HI t7Z JO *?:LIAll JO HIWON 1 *3 _L93/1'1,201 370c1 Y 3/140d NI 3)11cIS 1.0 1 60 8900 •373 71•8 :JLO NO2:1311V0 Y0 VYONOS JO &03 Al"N 1V _INV/Yak-I JO 170E1 1St13 NO -1- 22•1600 •373 71 "G NIVIC1 01 3Atid 1 1 • gEIZ NO11100V "Sal 3N1/7a3GAI1L •IN17,017°• Ng? gE 773M,'Ya ionLuswoo 1 Gyno ionyiSNO 0 ge:1179 ONI131 X3 =-=- =-- N3037 0600 37IJOetcl 73i N30 17 edno JO dOL LI 33N ION3 A iN1700 • HSVA1 `A_LN1700 3 NtOi OciS 6 NI ON.3 A.11\11700 J 0 30IJJO '.3AV HI t70 ( Y0 VelONOS 10 N0e131/11V0 5'9O ON _LOILLSIG 1N3113/10eld Otiad S./ 33 HS 6 JO 9 1331-16 1_1_6 1 C? 03 AOL ci c V • • • )■1'; 03 A 3/1&r1 S I W3A '09 =„I 'YOH 37VO N I1S1 X3 0.1 NoliondisNa) ON lAVc1 syno M3N .103NNO 0 133r Oe cl JO 0N3 0972+ 80 - 3IN"q V1-1.. 172. crY'D \ 6 ',ON\k(zDS ."2* 2:1E_Aln .L •J__ $._ n r m\4_ 8 nc 0 I • cDc:i (7) , `,Z•c= - "sSIV : f • \--‘ • Q + • b' 311d01:1d 3.1.Vid "f 1 1 , 66 * // 1 1 3A 3 .3A0111 1 1 ) ' z z 00 ri 0 0 In a 0 to 0 0 e) i9 24; .�ti; =: _...yp�' ^_ "c;`.x.: air *T{c`m,`t�:II3 °t -.".gyp ,.sw.. /3' 134 1 FAVB A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RIDGIMONT ESTATES Ei F 1 -?3�?2 r• l ti / �" jr • • /mss Lip DOTE Scale I" = 200' June 27, 1982 a 11/1 Fq P Is b. 21 ECEIVED JUL 23 1982 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT az 1E,c A' ryP:t A T 220 !.l\1/ -q Ei:,GT 12929 SPRAGUE AVE1'.Nuc SPOKANE, WASH1N .TON 99216 928 • ENGINEER INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. SOUTH 25 ALTAMONT STREET SPOKANE, WASHINGTON .99202 535 SITE DATA TOTAL ACREAGE-139 ACRES 285 LOTS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RES LOT SIZE 1o. Lots •L Acres ] 1O,O00- 12,500 sq.fti 115 .38.1 12,500 - 20,000 sq.fI 109 ! 47.4 I/2 Ac. min. i 61 L 53 5 285' I - 139.0 1 I_i 1 TT I t A 3M , '' - --l o: ijic.37-/-111O'k 1 V i -- L _.._ J ..... ' i t , L= j q I �1vF. 1' • VICINITY MA^ e t 4 I 0 /0 27 34 39 100 sib SEWAGE DISPOSAL - INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC TANK AND DR ... W/ DRY LINE SEWERS SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE This mop was prepared by me or under my direct supervision in in conformance with the requirements of the Spokane County Subd I, SPRAGUE AVENUE. ( r I j S�N°2 J l i • K t. nonce. Q w :i 9,5 /22 kIi12 ®1 1a2 i4 r 4 /E2 J ZZ,Z / o V 5 c.: • /,__( ': 8c4 8 (j 'L . //4 /Ji 1 i2a75 IN i L ® , O2.6$ /22 kIi12 ®1 1a2 •' 1 3 ; • CUCH® • • r 4 /E2 J ZZ,Z / o V i s /3S 3®ft4 /784/ ¶\.L •' •' V .. CO `DO ,36: g ' /78.4/ 95• 150 •' •' V .. CO `DO 3ii/5JO D 3) g ' I® r- iot• ': 8c4 J - rtrzri O i5 13 , 8' 3d'71 Dr- ST ' T : : 4 '. : ® I ® ® [D ® flR ® ® ( t �, c • /2 • Iz 4,22 ® I 60' &/( I 3II N CV _ tr) ,IZ'OSZ Lqi 3 0) j 3 - © 20 = 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 3193 0) ® € € ® © •® 12 150' 150' 16d .- t. to' 161.01 160' 299.31' i 95• ,00• •' •' V .. CO `DO 3ii/5JO D 3) g ' I® r- iot• r �; 8c4 J - rtrzri O i5 13 , 8' 3d'71 Dr- ST ' T 9,1 [D CH flR /7 ( t �, 1/ 1g • /2 • Iz /3 ® /4 1 '-- t® &/( I 18 j02 ti� ®. i JOO Ie � 1l 3 LAbb V .. CO `DO 3ii/5JO D 3) g ' I® g \K�� iZ 0 1 1 q 2 q 3 J 9 8±_ i5 13 , 8' 5t cD gd & 1l 3 LAbb l { 4 1 1 g ' 14 tiLJ iZ 0 1 I) ° Id 9 8±_ i5 13 , 8' 1- czt X2028. •X202 'f3 . RI. -9 2164.4 27'— Avenger I 6o ft R /w / . 44_ 2033, 0 ' y {t: �ovi ig w/ curbs x ex,597:1 / XD '6 4 17A 2050.8 X2024.4 SPONSOR SULLIVAN SOUTH ENTERPRISES EAST 12929 SPRAGUE AVENUE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99216 928 ENGINEER INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. SOUTH 25 ALTAMONT STREET SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99202 535 - 1410 SITE DATA TOTAL ACREAGE - 88 ACRES 216 LOTS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES MINIMUM LOT SIZE 12,500 SQ. FT. TYPICAL& MINIMUM FRONTAGE 100 FT. (at building setback Line) SEWAGE DISPOSAL-- INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC TANKS AND DRAINFIELDS (interim systems) SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE This map was prepared by me or under my direct supervision in April, 1982, in conformance with the requirements of the Spokane County Subdivision .Ordinance.' A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF . VICINITY MAP 2 q t.' A VE. SUPERIOR REPROGRAPHICS TB -344 'C1 P/N — /- 7 HS SC/// /ERDCD FO NN yA. . Ry q 03 04001 7 //o. 5.72 -0 " 24TH AVE. ne -Jo , 4 7 12 1 - 0 t..1 89122 cr. A •30 4 4' ' \- - er 3i‘. • T 15 4 115;, '7. 5 , ' . • ' 111 L 307.3 .1 / - .: . 01 / "4 ' • < 3 e .A.. ii:i . 4-- 4 Ln■ l e t- / ,, .9. - 4- 1 /n/ (1 / C - I) C' ..-• ' ''- / <1. • - ?cr 1/47 - ' / . "( ° 3?„ S A 25°38' _Zi ---13 ' '',.<‘• / I.. 17 016 IRt- a . 6; - r 8 t. -■ \ '` / 0. e 6 L I 60 A 3600 4. i ....._ ' ( . 1 , N C 20* R - I - . - r 53.3' 1 L 180.3' g • Airy 6 / 9 4. 20 C X-Lot 1 o 389°51E TETlON POND SITE t Is 89 _ < °34'88 293 30' 32 ' v° ire DATE 4., 9 TYPE B CEMENT CONCRETE CURB. TYPICAL LT. a RT. 0.17 DEPTH CLASS B ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 0.17 ' COMPACTED DEPTH CLASS B ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 0.I 7' "COMPACTED DEPTH CLASS B ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CROWN 0.17.' COMPACTED DEPTH CLASS E ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT. 0.17 COMPACTED DEPTH CLASS E ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT. 017'COMPACTED DEPTH CLASS E ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 0.50 COMPACTED DEPTH CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE. STA.67+00 TO $ 9 +25 STA.100 +67.35 TO 110+00 0.50' COMPACTED DEPTH CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE. 0.50' COMPACTED DEPTH CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE. 42.5 033'COMPACTED DEPTH CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE. TYPICAL LT a RT. TYPE B CEMENT CONCRETE CURB. TYPICAL LT &RT. NOTE: SEE SHEET No. FOR PATHWAY & SWALE TYPICAL SECTION e► A NAL REGION No. NOTE: STA.103-1-33.2 TO 105 +15 R/W IS 31.. 20/ STATE FED. AID PROJECT No F.A.M. `No.4I03 (2 ) U.A.B. Not 8- 3032 (40) CEMENT CONCRETE PATH WAY. COUNTY ROAD PROJECT No. 1679 SULLIVAN ' ROAD FA.M. No.4103(2) / U.A.B. No.8- 3032(40). OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASH. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SHEET . / : OF SHEETS, 1 NE N . / . ,.., — • ' , -4 5'0 . • .5 VE .2 :.•'... 2 3 4 • .,. ,- /-7'. ,6t. /' /// / Le: P E A . 1 NE L: a; V .., , 111 2, le .: . : ; . .7 1 -, L: a; 4 7 .., ., • .: . : ; . .7 .5 VE .2 1 2 3 4 1 2 L: a; 4 7 5 to "./:: / t`, .: . : ; . .7 .5 VE .2 $1- wt-:: 7 2 /Yr% Ai- 2339 G4 4.7„5 N 34-4 _ era. 04-4.7,5 BA. tI 6 /VOA 3 TWELFTH F,:atta 6 121 1,5 IF Cr % t.)!••° t CO 6 .209 I2ss (.'„ ',./ 2..654.c 64.5:70 / . :so' 1 • 1:k:°;1 9 • TYV ELF T :ait)21::= hie. 1 -- 6417.e /3 1 ,i ANNA 1 ax.14. 2 1. 244.5 265 - Itittli t 1, ..1 111.tt 2Fc AVE tilt.JE Si89122' 1/ 7 / 4 - 7 • 1—f Qj /1.• /Q• t ...„ 1 .9 / MI in/ 1 '. / .525 lL c 14,0 Rt. 4 T 81.4' L 60.2 APER 2 3 1982 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9 1 I , ! 7 Co/UNT Y, R0 AD rAtr L-07" 1 1 03 K I -- -03/0 VII/ 3 ik-Lot20,Blk 1 RIO N cr 2. 09/4 Z45q,F425/6 I • 1 07/5 -07/9 - o7.3./ 2q5 311 24 r 0 1-0 0 I .R 7 5 . 22 s .9° 4 - 7 1 e 'TA R r' • k -.2 1 22 I 23 p. t.tit 31• •.:. 255/11- DRIVE PR14401-A-R-V- 40 Y 2 4.9.6 5 '? 4 .... 0 b71_ . _ 441 Is. ., _. i 2 d : .3 - 4, 1 "'Sp." c-R.A •,,,, ...... / 0 n iNt ; fik AC% / 1,...41(j 65.0 C57C .rassilA '2:22E P 2-0 4.. n• rote Ai 2 5;: S . SPI=ZAGti E SPOKANE 7 44.75 211 2 27 224 6) 0 0 STATC ) COUNTY •1,1 - . Al ? 4 et ' t ' _ 5E2 1840-43) 17 Doc.44.304,5 is+t? V 4 V 4 ". , t " 4 4 a (I, ‘--. E M ■ ' ; l'''z'c + l a° 4'3 ' I62 ' il • _] _ . .. -- .--1 - .. ....47.7 .-i3. Q — + 14 — 589 ° 55E NO. l2 n (1, 0 • c›. %• 36.° o C T /840-7 c;:a:F:r . ••• I I ;21, L-7 - • 4 • 4 .t of rrx. t ' . , II 7 6+85.5 - POT. 0 —u (.1 c 6 c z —20f (SHELLEY iIY /VO. /25E) N C \ r 5) —0 0 •A I- ; SHELLEY LAKE 1 RI 1 5.04 AC. GRAVEL - _5_P_ 1 1 G ,. 1 6 1 4 1 19 18 /' 17 / L: a; 114 .: . : ; . .7 . : .2 $1- wt-:: 7 2 /Yr% Ai- 2339 G4 4.7„5 N 34-4 _ era. 04-4.7,5 BA. tI 6 /VOA 3 TWELFTH F,:atta 6 121 1,5 IF Cr % t.)!••° t CO 6 .209 I2ss (.'„ ',./ 2..654.c 64.5:70 / . :so' 1 • 1:k:°;1 9 • TYV ELF T :ait)21::= hie. 1 -- 6417.e /3 1 ,i ANNA 1 ax.14. 2 1. 244.5 265 - Itittli t 1, ..1 111.tt 2Fc AVE tilt.JE Si89122' 1/ 7 / 4 - 7 • 1—f Qj /1.• /Q• t ...„ 1 .9 / MI in/ 1 '. / .525 lL c 14,0 Rt. 4 T 81.4' L 60.2 APER 2 3 1982 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9 1 I , ! 7 Co/UNT Y, R0 AD rAtr L-07" 1 1 03 K I -- -03/0 VII/ 3 ik-Lot20,Blk 1 RIO N cr 2. 09/4 Z45q,F425/6 I • 1 07/5 -07/9 - o7.3./ 2q5 311 24 r 0 1-0 0 I .R 7 5 . 22 s .9° 4 - 7 1 e 'TA R r' • k -.2 1 22 I 23 p. t.tit 31• •.:. 255/11- DRIVE PR14401-A-R-V- 40 Y 2 4.9.6 5 '? 4 .... 0 b71_ . _ 441 Is. ., _. i 2 d : .3 - 4, 1 "'Sp." c-R.A •,,,, ...... / 0 n iNt ; fik AC% / 1,...41(j 65.0 C57C .rassilA '2:22E P 2-0 4.. n• rote Ai 2 5;: S . SPI=ZAGti E SPOKANE 7 44.75 211 2 27 224 6) 0 0 STATC ) COUNTY •1,1 - . Al ? 4 et ' t ' _ 5E2 1840-43) 17 Doc.44.304,5 is+t? V 4 V 4 ". , t " 4 4 a (I, ‘--. E M ■ ' ; l'''z'c + l a° 4'3 ' I62 ' il • _] _ . .. -- .--1 - .. ....47.7 .-i3. Q — + 14 — 589 ° 55E NO. l2 n (1, 0 • c›. %• 36.° o C T /840-7 c;:a:F:r . ••• I I ;21, L-7 - • 4 • 4 .t of rrx. t ' . , II 7 6+85.5 - POT. 0 —u (.1 c 6 c z —20f (SHELLEY iIY /VO. /25E) N C \ r 5) —0 0 •A I- ; SHELLEY LAKE 1 RI 1 5.04 AC. GRAVEL - _5_P_ 1 1 G ,. 1 6 1 4 1 19 18 /' 17 / L: a; .: . : ; . .7 . : .2 2 3 4 IlD $1- wt-:: 7 2 /Yr% Ai- 2339 G4 4.7„5 N 34-4 _ era. 04-4.7,5 BA. tI 6 /VOA 3 TWELFTH F,:atta 6 121 1,5 IF Cr % t.)!••° t CO 6 .209 I2ss (.'„ ',./ 2..654.c 64.5:70 / . :so' 1 • 1:k:°;1 9 • TYV ELF T :ait)21::= hie. 1 -- 6417.e /3 1 ,i ANNA 1 ax.14. 2 1. 244.5 265 - Itittli t 1, ..1 111.tt 2Fc AVE tilt.JE Si89122' 1/ 7 / 4 - 7 • 1—f Qj /1.• /Q• t ...„ 1 .9 / MI in/ 1 '. / .525 lL c 14,0 Rt. 4 T 81.4' L 60.2 APER 2 3 1982 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9 1 I , ! 7 Co/UNT Y, R0 AD rAtr L-07" 1 1 03 K I -- -03/0 VII/ 3 ik-Lot20,Blk 1 RIO N cr 2. 09/4 Z45q,F425/6 I • 1 07/5 -07/9 - o7.3./ 2q5 311 24 r 0 1-0 0 I .R 7 5 . 22 s .9° 4 - 7 1 e 'TA R r' • k -.2 1 22 I 23 p. t.tit 31• •.:. 255/11- DRIVE PR14401-A-R-V- 40 Y 2 4.9.6 5 '? 4 .... 0 b71_ . _ 441 Is. ., _. i 2 d : .3 - 4, 1 "'Sp." c-R.A •,,,, ...... / 0 n iNt ; fik AC% / 1,...41(j 65.0 C57C .rassilA '2:22E P 2-0 4.. n• rote Ai 2 5;: S . SPI=ZAGti E SPOKANE 7 44.75 211 2 27 224 6) 0 0 STATC ) COUNTY •1,1 - . Al ? 4 et ' t ' _ 5E2 1840-43) 17 Doc.44.304,5 is+t? V 4 V 4 ". , t " 4 4 a (I, ‘--. E M ■ ' ; l'''z'c + l a° 4'3 ' I62 ' il • _] _ . .. -- .--1 - .. ....47.7 .-i3. Q — + 14 — 589 ° 55E NO. l2 n (1, 0 • c›. %• 36.° o C T /840-7 c;:a:F:r . ••• I I ;21, L-7 - • 4 • 4 .t of rrx. t ' . , II 7 6+85.5 - POT. 0 —u (.1 c 6 c z —20f (SHELLEY iIY /VO. /25E) N C \ r 5) —0 0 •A I- ; SHELLEY LAKE 1 RI 1 5.04 AC. GRAVEL - _5_P_ 1 1 G ,. 1 6 1 4 1 19 18 /' 17 / SULLIVAN 1 0"FCHFOR.D . w Q } m Q J 0 W W Y Y U U W U U o Z< W 0 W WW 2 z � N Q < Q 0 z 0 W W S W z J U Q 0 N .................... .................... .................... ....................................... ............................... SEC.26 T..25 N. R.44 E.W M. St7' ST A.. G +OU To 90 t 55 -.14.12 1At L 2. I-4' r2� mAx.�� 7 • 110u SE 1 0 / z 1. :2 El- LEV. 34-. 4 1 APPROVED SHEET OF SHEETS .E.L.E.V. 3 ELEV. 3 I .SI.L Ic:D" X - 33 1 fvyp -5 . 7C) P7 . 'WM )(1S TVG e>" ..5TA . 2.1 + C>C) OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON RID. 284 24 TH AVENUE REVISED DRAINAGE PROFILE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER .4" Pc.c. cAP Ex - H .1Ryv‘/Pi L IT- t-i c.c• E >cc-RA- \-\ YN _ vv NOTE: CAT Cet BASINS A Re: WArst-\ INIGTON 4- .c—. HICHvvAy c Ai ftJLE2 7 TYPE_ I. USA GRA "Al PRs AT iv■ ELEA/ 3`_1 e,"7 3 4- a:A 4. EY1STI rs-1 STA. Z1 4- 30 x ESS' N.rt —'.3 °/<, SO PEPF PIPE. 1 4 <5' LEV. 7.7 274 0 - 17 0 , 4- Rcick Esut PR ( I LE— ELE v o \a. a77 C)R.N vv c-o\I SECTION A -A R/W 6" CLAY CAP OVER BUILDING PAPER 4" CONCRETE ROCK BACKFILL— DRAINAGE PROFILE SCALE I "= 20 HORZ. 1 5' VERT. 22k% 0 S P r / Cc. GPI F.L. 33.34 F.L.32.92/ 0 N N — 4.3% /8"); 30'HEL C.MP EL. 35.82 F. L. 34.68/ — 3.2% 8'z 30'HEL. C.M.P. F. L. 34.43 F. L.33.59 — 1.6 0 / 0 24 "x 3 0'HEL. C.M.P MSS, i — 2.0% 24 "x 54' HEL. C.M.P F.L. 32.71 FINISH GRADE F. L. 31.77 / 125' OF DRYWELL .90 LT. OF STA . 21 +96.31 ELEV. 2035.43 SOLID COVER DOUBLE DEPTH DRYWELL ROCK SUMP ti 0 N NOTE; CATCH BASINS ARE WASHINGTON HIGHWAY DEPTS. GRATE INLET TYPE I. USE GRATE A. DEPRESS GRATES MIN. 0.1'. NOTE: A. BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE NATURALLY FORMED , WASHED ROCK GRADED FROM 1" TO 3" & MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENGINEER. BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED & COMPACTED IN 6" LAYERS TO THE LENGTH & WIDTH OF THE EXCAVATION. B. THE CEMENT CONCRETE CAP IS TO EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 2' OVER UNDISTURBED GROUND BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THE ROCK SUMP EXCAVATION & BACKFILL . C. ALL CULVERT PIPE TO BE SCHEDULE "A s •1 SPOKANE COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER 24 TH. AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 284 APPROVED. 9 1 /5 1 77 COUNTY ENGINEER SHEET 3 of 9 FILE NO. • X2028. ` i E, /2 �� 024.4 22 4 4 .� P. I.- 2049.5 2033.0 x • • .c R1. -9 2164.4 Scale: 1 = 200 June 27, 1982 A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SPONSOR SULLIVAN SOUTH ENTERPRISES EAST 12929 SPRAGUE. AVENUE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99216 928 - 1991 ENGINEER INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. SOUTH 25 ALTAMONT . STREET SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99202 535 - 1410 SITE DATA TOTAL ACREAGE 139 ACRES 285 LOTS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES LOT SIZE No. Lots Acres % 10,000- 12,500 sq.ft. 115 38.1 27 12,500- 20,000 sq.ft, 109 47.4 34 I/2 Ac. min. 61 53.5 39 285 139.0 100 SEWAGE DISPOSAL - INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC TANK A ND DRAINFIELDS W/ DRY LINE SEWERS VICINITY MAP PROJECT SITE Shelley Lake This map was prepared by me or under my direct supervision in June, 1982, in conformance with the requirements of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. SUPERIOR REPROGRAPHICS TB -344 1/ 7 / - 1 , .1 - Ag=c = == 254,000 C C I N n y d r p SUPERIOR REPROGRAPHICS TB -344 24th131 °AVENUE 21'9' - — J` .. ; +`fi Fire, r - / ant / , 4 ••• / 1 4:5 �. / /i/ /FL hiIhZ 1 /."1/70,:f(irr / �� \ -- / . V _ Scale: 1 = 200' April 7, 1982 FANG /rV�"E�gS PE 1443• F DGIMON A PRELIMINARY PLAT -S OF AT IS NO 4 in the NWI /4 of SECTION 25, T. 25 N., R.44 E.,W.M. SPONSOR SULLIVAN SOUTH ENTERPRISES EAST 12929 SPRAGUE AVENUE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99216 928 ENGINEER INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. SOUTH 25 ALTAMONT STREET SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99202 535 -1410 SITE DATA TOTAL ACREAGE - 88'ACRES 216 LOTS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES MINIMUM LOT SIZE 12,500 SQ. FT. TYPICAL& MINIMUM FRONTAGE 100 FT. (at building setback line) SEWAGE DISPOSAL INDIVIDUAL SL! IC TANKS AND DRAINFIELDS (interim systems) SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE This map was prepared by me or under my direct supervision in April, 1982, in conformance with the requirements of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. VICINITY MAP 11 fl AOAM� EL.EM 2y' AVE. 5PRAGUE AVENUE 7, /6'h AVENUE 0 ( - PROJECT 0 I SITE ��A �� J �I s' CEN7RAL — I VALLEY 1 f / /GH 1 SCHOOL —J Shelley Lake aiy ECEIVE APP, 23 1982 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4/./3yea OvL z NOTE: 21 w .v. S.S. MH. 0 22 Stormwater ftowtng off Ridgemont Estates No.4 2 Adc - l - iovt will lie within +he. drainage areas of future Rtdgemont Estates subdivisions and will be considered \n - Future R■dgemovt Es - toes' drainage plans. Construct 5' - G" Cement Concrete Sidewalk Sta. 2'3+03.35 to 26 *77.2 I , Left - --w = RUNOFF FLOW DIRECTION = DRAIN AGE. AREA SOU N DARN = DRYWELL LEGEND 24TH, 50 28 Scale in Feet 50 I00 29 • 2S- *70.50 NORTH 7 RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO.4 -2 ADD. DRAINAGE AND STREET PLAN O E $1MPSON ENGINEERS, INC. 1N11. 909 ARGbNNE ROAD PH:926 -1322 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99212 DRAWN BY: Kevin W. M'Mulkin CHECKED BY: G / Z S /9 PROJECT NO. 12290 DRAWING NO. 3OF4 Pc. 1t +2s 114 \ I 20.0o 1 • N / Telephone OW. pW. P.P. pw. Riser __ - O /--,L , - �Q P .P. -_ C3 C.B. o o G.S. O z/ 1 4. 3 1'U3.27 Dubte B y �j es, (pe t3 M Fram e Dr Gr 9 .te kl ,Typ 3 STA. Otso, ZS' slat, Cut -de -Sa STA. I6+40, 25' fight , Z3RD A . Top Grate, El 33 Povtd Bottom , ley. 32 Double. Barrel Metal Frame. T G 5TA. 14+30, 25 R' 57A. 01-50 , 25' Top Grate, Eke . 33 9°6 Pond Bottom, kev. 3Z \ Construct C rb Cut \ a de.e? e. Low oin+ (M.P.) \ /7 i I M 1 1 Construct - Curb / Cut 8" deep @ STA. tat 5 Pond Bottom, Elev. 32 0 Ooo 4 o/ / 3X3% - --f -- - - - - -- � %- - t� ___ ons+ruct S Curb Cut £3“ deep e STA. 13 +10 \ Double Barrek Orywelt ,Type B \ Metal Frame. T Grate `G 3 Spokane Coun-ty Standard \ S`TA. 131 , 25' Right Z3RD Nye. \ \ ` \ Top Grate l E lev. 32 . 111 0 I3 2.I .00 zi MO OM Construct 5' Cut S" deep @SSA. VB-t00 \ 8 0 . 0 q 9 \o J �qs Le h /12 / a tv D N / �, /9ation Turnout/ 0 T wat eryr% /t20.00 _ ° _nO N �-- Existing Cement Concrete Curb -� 23 24 ( fi■--S.S. M. 25 \ j1 11 B A SI N X / O MOD One 140, o 0 U) r co d N �o Construc± S Curb Cut .91 N 8" deep @ h 7, RP l h \ 1 / STA. 17t Bo Single_ Barrel Drywe. \\ Type. p Metal Frame T Grate ,Type 3 Spokane Coun+ Standard STA.I +Co, 2S RAgtn-t Top Grate , Elev. 32 Pov c1 Bottom, Elev. 32. Construe.* 7' Curb Cu* a" deep @ Low Point (M.P) Z18.0 I 1 7G. op I oe ti Telephone-= Riser W 0 AVENUE CMS CMS A 0 Watermet Guy P.P 292.57 s aa p0 ® qm - N R/W Telephone. Riser TYPICAL SIDEWALK SECTION : 24TH AVENUE STA. 23+18.35 TO 26+77.21 Existing 5' -c:i' Curb and Sidewalk 5' - G;" %44' PER FT. � Exis - ti i Pavemevrr I Construct 5 -Co Sidewatk I 1 Portland Cement Concrete L - Exis-tin Cement Concrete Spokane County Standard ling t2.'' ..M•P. C lvert om Verb. Crest rive. w e r. n� + w er 4 tE cl S �5e hT 1 0 1 1 G 30' /j 20 --- -�► l I 1/1 I � / / � �_\ el.)? / \ / aJ / / / / // / - il 4/ 4 / j 7- „ (...• ". ....;) , / 4 / / I 1 ( Curb TJP "A" r) Top Curb i I "l / I'; 1 1 � e 4 y / I / � iii + � 1 � j �r 1 / " . #1 I ,;1 / II ,/,/ // / ( Y ( ( / ■ DETAIL : TRANSITION IN CURB AT DRIVEWAYS AND DRAINAGE CUTS Transition Driveway i , Drainage Cut Transition i T ! 2.0 Gutter Driveway Cut Depress ion 10.0 TYPICAL DRIVEWAY SECTION NO . SCALE 13.0 Varies R/w o.otC0 PILE DEVELOPER 0 , 7.0 ,10.0 Normal Swale Slope Cevnent Concrete Driveway - Swale Bottom Curb Cut Depression 1.5 'E 18.0 Go" Curb Cut l' l Slope, min : 3:1 slope. me . f rove top o� dr'�vew � - to bo of Swale TYPICAL DRYWELL LOCATION NO SCALE DATE I 1 � Drywetl NOTE : Drywel \s are not Placed. directl adjacent to curb cuts See plans -For drywelt location. 0 >- m z 0 6 6 z Z w 0 LAI w ce 0 u 0 , uj I- 0 I- < M 0 uJ 0 z cd 0 z 2035 •11111= ••••• •1111111•••••••••••=1111•1 MI= OM= 0111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 MIMI AMMO Mi■MR•lM:IC MilWill0111g=11/111111 IIMENNIMI •11111•11=11•11•1111111111=1=11111111 MIMIMNIM111•11 ....AM= N•111111 =111111111••111111111MMIIIMMIIIIIMMIIIIIIMMIRMIN ■MII11111111 =NNW 111111111M-A----11••••••= MIN= =M•I CIIIIIIMMILIMMIMIIIMINIMMIIMM INNI1= ••••• MI= Ell1111121=11•1; 2•111112111011M1C;■1 1111111111111111111111111•11111111111111•1111111111=111P.6 WIESEN •••••1•••=1•11MMIE2111111=111111111 1111111121/11111111111M1M11111111 =111111111=1111111 •1111101••••=1Wal•MI =Ma •111111111111•1111MINIMIM=111111•1•111111•1 •1111111111111111111111•11•1121111111111111•111111•11=IMMLA=1•1 ••••••••11=1•MMIMMIIMMIMIIIMI •1111=1•1=1•1 Ir.r.lri"lill =Nam MEIN 0111111111=11111=111111=1 MIMI Idl. •1010glaidl •111111•11•••=1M=11 IMM9 KM= 111•111•1•=11111=1111111M1 •1111111111111•111111a1 MIOMM31Mi •1111==== swim am= =11111111111 1111=111•1111iN •1111•101•111111•2 ••=1•1•1=11•11111111•111111111111••••••1 =MI •1111=1 MEM NUMMI! MINIM i nn I I 1 111111111111111111. I ME =MN .1111■M■11 111111•11•111111=1•1111•1111•1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 = 4■ MOIMMI=1•11•1•IMMEM =MI Nina It MIME =ME MIIIIIIPJMNIMIMINIM1111=1•1111=11•1 MI= 111•1= MUM ILM1111111•1•11=1=111111 •11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111=M=111=1111111111110••1••••• MIMI MIS= 1111111111MIMMIMI INI■Nraim MIME =111•11 ■1111111=11111111111•111111111111111•11122112211111111111•11=r1111=1•1 M•1=1•111111112•111•11111•1 =111=1 MEM .91•1012•1••••EUIEFI•1 MU MIM M PA M E21=111111•11=11/11=111111111111= =1111•• 11111•1111111111111111111111111111=INIMILMS= milliiiini■ =ma M11111111111•11111•212 2,1111111••=1•1 MIME MIIIIIIIMI =WI Call11=11•1•11MLN•111 ••11111•111=110 =MI •=1110•11111111•1112 1111111111•11■2'''"=.3 III= PIM IC: --■ . Ir=rs E -- MIMIIMINIMMUNIIIIMM•11•1•111=1•1211•11111•• un m WNW= INIIIMMIMULUMMIR immilliom NEN= i?" q =11111111=01111111===h111•11=1411111111=11M4•1•11 MWMilemsal12N=YMIN/M'qMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1NIIIIIMIMIIIIIIIIIII=1 1111•11111•1111=1=11111•1•11MILIVAIMMIIMMIMIMIMMIMULMMINIMI••••• imsizdi •11111=1 •1111111•11•11121111111111111== mum inammi =Num milmmium mom isamm mom mil!"..M1111111111111 Mill MIME MIMI MIIII MIMI MIMI MIIIMINIIIIMM =11111111111 M EM 11=11111=1111111•1 1=11=11=IIMM IN=111111=11101•1=11111M•1 MIN= =11111111111=111111111111 ■11111•1••■•=1•1•111111211=■• /IIIII MOM MIMI MOM MIMI M11111111•111111 11111•11111111M =I •111=111111111 MIIMM =111111111111MMIN • I111111=11111• MMUM=111111•1 111111=1 ■1 MIIIIIIMM111111•111111111111M2 M11111111111 =11111111111 •111111=1==•11111 0111.51U1=1111111=11111111111=1/1 PA MIIIIIMEINIIIIMM 11 =11111111111•11111111/11•11111111•1•11111111ii1=111111111•1111110•1•1111111•=111111111 11111=11111=11=1111•11•11111 MIME " MIIIIIIIIIIMMIMM1111111111111=11=1=21116111 =1111111111•11111111111 MIIIIIMAIMMIIIIMMIIME1=111=11111111111M1 FIN111111111111 111111102 ME= •111111111111111 A =LIM MIIIMM=111/11111IMMII■ MIIIIEMIIMIIM =I =Mil IN■Migi ME= 2=011==1 MN11111111111=1111= WINN • OM= MIMMMMI IIMMIMIIIIIMMIIIIIIMIIMINN•111111CUI ' M11111111•11•1•011. Ma1111111111111110011=11 =MI M111=2111 Mil MIIMIIIIIIMMIll•M =Ma = 11 MEI= MIIIIIMMILI•=1•1111111M1' P1111111•11•11111M Hill111111111•111111111•11441M1111=11 =MIN 1141!=1111•••=11•111111111111 M111111111111= Mi=••=123 bil•IMMIMMIM1 IMLU gamm a 11=11111111•1111111=11=11111111111 C MIIIM11111111MM Ir =11111•11111M•1•1111= MIMEO MINN "MMUMMIIIMMII M111111111 1511•11•1=1101L 11•••12•111111•1 NM MIMI= =111=111 •••=11111112111111111=111MAE11111111111•1111111•2M=•=1111111111111111111111111ML 1111LaM • INIMI1111 =WV E CNIMIIIIIMMIM MINIMMIIII:aLM111•11111■MIM MIIIIIMI MIIMMI= i =Mara amommotill iiimi■N■imiasismoilil ' E'■11VIIMMINIIIIM1011•111•1b1 11G7•111 MIIIIMIMMIPIIIII. 111•111111111111111•1•111111111111=====•=n1FM1111111110 MEI • MY= =I= Ir=11•••MMEI111111=1=11111R111•11111=11NM=MMIIMMZA11111111111 111111111=11•1111111111111=11111111011=1•12111111•1•111=1 =ME ME =11111111111 11210111•=1111111••••••••=1 1•1•1•1= M= • MI= MI111111= 111.! M11111•11=111111111111•1•111L' MN • Mall: 11=1111= •1•1•111•1111111 • !EMIL= Milo am' ....1111•1•111111•11•11111111 MEI= MINS a .. .1=.1= wa. .....a.---- m1= • - MIIIIIIIIMII=.._ .w......i== • •111=1•11111=11 ____.... =IIIIP -1rXMiii111 •11==1=1•11511=1101 AlE=1MC-21011•1 IIIIIIIIM 11111•111••■•=•11111111E1L1•1111•11=1111111111111=111111111/11 M1111111 41:71 TM - 1 - M - 1111■11• 4 E 11111122111111111 =0 11111•1111111. !!!!=•111 ■=111111111111 •III111111111111•111111•111111===1 ••= MMEM11111111111U=111==111111111 M:•= /1= tfl MEM amiliellIIIII=11111111111161111M11111= "WI MI= MOM REMO M2111=1 1111111111111M1==•=11=11•11111= MI= MEM 1•1••• 112111111111111•1=11== =1111111111=11111= MI= 111111111111=1•111111= MEMO M M1 =WM 11111111•1111111111111••••• MUM MII1111111 •1111111•11=111111111111 =MI MIMI 1111= WM 2 = KM= =ME ••=1=111110•11=1111111•1 •1111=1•••••1 •111111111111 ilm M is •1111•1===• =MEI MIIIM111111•11•••=11111=111=111111•11111111111111 111111111 •11111•1•11111••=111111111111111111•11•11111=110 IIIIIIIIII MEIN 11111111. MI •111•11111•1111 MIME ....1...= .............m. =1111•11 =MN MIMI •1111111111111 umiiiiiiiimmill11=M•1111•11•=111111111 =III= 11•112•11=1•■•••••1 IMI■ •••••1 111111111111 MI= M•11111•11=1•111•1•11111==== =NM =MUM= MI= =11=10=111= MIMI IIIIIII Mal 111.1 111111111 II= MEI =111111111 11===1111111•11 •••=111=11•211111111111MISMIIIIM MI= al•11•1•11111•11• 11111111111111 91 111111 ..m...... =I ...........■=......... .......■ ...... MIMI IIIIIIIIIIIIII =Rs. mom .... 111.1 .... ..... ......................... ............................................ MI= M111111111 MEM !JI REM IMMIMIIMMIN IBILMMINIMMIMIIIIII MI 11[161 MEM MIMMIMININMIMININIMININ MIMI LI D1N MEM MN INIIMMIMMI MIIIIIIIMMIllell 5211111111NNIIINNI mil mili ammilliumni imi lows 1111.11111111111111 Firs •1111•111111MINFIE NIMIMMINIMIN11111111111111MM INIIMIM MUM MU IiIMMIMIMIMI !IMMO MUM !III IIMMINIIIIA1 MEM MEM MN MO 1111111MIMMIMMIMIN MISO Id MEI I!! =ram No rimmum. mom MI= =INN MI1111111 =MI =I MME=M111 111•1•111MARMI•1111•11•111111•1•1 1111112011•11 CaN11111=1111•1111111111111 •=11•• MIll 21111111=111111111111M1•1152 ME 1312 MN= MI= ......___■iph._ -, 1L=111111111•11111•111•111•M•111111RMINI•1•1 MUM =NM =MI ELM= =1111=11•••••=1111•11111•=11 =MTN LLIMIll M1111111•11111=11111111•=111111•1111•11111111•••====1•1111111111M MEM •11111111•1•111•11•1111111=1••1111=======111111■1 11111111111=1111111111•11111•11•11111=1=110 •1111111111•11111111/2 PM= •110=1•11111111111=11•111111•1111111111=Ma IFS MIIIM MUM NINIMMINMNIN MUM MINNINNIMIN MUM M1111111111!IIM1111111111 NEM 11111110111 • mom esomicalooMMINIIIINNIMIN MUM MUM MINIM AMMO fer•LII !na '1!11111111111MI LUNEN MIMMI =1111•1111■11111111 MIM11•1 NM= IMMO MIMI ••••11•11=11 MINIMMIMMIMMI MININIMIMMIIIMMIMIMIIIMI M 11=11•=1111111111•1111=1•1111=MIMMIIIMINIM MIIIMMIMMIIM1•11=== •1•1•11 1•11•1•11===== MOM MIMI MI!! •11111111111111111111M1111 allIMMIIIM111■ =MN 1=111•1•1=11111============ •111•11•1 •1•11111!•M MIMI MIIMEN MINIMI=111111111=111=1 =111=1 M•1=1=11=1=111111111 =MIN =1•11=1111=!=1"..111111••=11111.11.Th1111•.= 11•11=1 MINIMUM= ••••=1111•111 1•111•111 1111111=11mm •=11•INIMIIIIIIIIMMIMII•1=•=11111 =MI •=11•11=111= =1111===111 !II MM." MEM =11=1 MI= 1=1111•1=111= =NEI ••=11 IMMO •IMIIMII=MINIMMIIIMMI MIMI MIIMMI MM11111•11111111MIMMMI MEM =MEM WI I. 111 ■ I I I M MI I = II l imommom = . I I I I I I I I I I I I in I I I I M MI. I I I I I I =ii I I . I M I I I i m EN mi I . I . I I 1 18=. =I 11 I I I I I I 1 1 7 !i !MIMI= !IN MN!! NINIMIIMMINIMIM MIMI IMMINNIMINIMI MN!! MINS !MI! MIMI IIMM MIMMM MIIIII.II MIIIMINIIMIN MIIIIMINIMMIIIIMIIIIII MMIN MEM IIIINIMM MIME MINIIIIIIIIIMIIIIMIMMINIMMINIIII MINIMMIMINNIIIIMMIMINIM MINNIE 1111•11111•1111•11111•111!111111111!IUMMAITIMUMMUMM MINN MINIM MNIMIIMMOBINMOMMMIEMMIMIMMIIMI MIIIII =ME •IIMMIIIMEME=111=1111111111 MIIIIIMMI MEM NIIMMIIMMINIMMIMO• MIIIIIIIIIIMIMIMIIIIIIMIIIIMINEMINIMMINMEN• 11=1•11 •11111•11111MIM •=1•11•11111111111=0111111=• =111=1111=11111111M1•1 =V= NIMMUM1211221== imow mum _ _ . wall= milom Nomammairosipmem mriardsiewnsiateenimm INIMMIIIIII!!MMINERNEII!! pH MillW....... ■: 4 •, IMMIX =AM =11•11• 11211/MratiMMT2221=111111 IllifIM MINIIIMMIMMINVI.2"21/ •111111111111•111= azionmisidiuMMINIMI IILM .TWAF-AMFM111 .IniMMINIIMIM MIMNIMI MIMI MIIMMI MUM MIIIMUMMI liMilLVESFAMII IIIMMINSINNI IMMINI 11111■111MINIVIINNINIEMIWNSI SMIIIMIll MUM IMINI6NENNEEliiinlIMINIMIMMIMMIMINIMI !I MINIUM NIMMIM MMISIM IMMIN NINNIN MN= IMMO =NM NEM MIMI !III ENININ MIME IIMNIMII•IMMINIIIMINNINIMMIIMININ MEM MEM MEM !I MIMEOS MINN MUM MUM MEM MINIM •11111111MIIIMINIIIMI MN= 11111111111MMIMI 11111! =11111111= NEM MINIIIMIIMMEN sl MI :*1141:2 :11:&1111111r11:211.1417/4111 MEM liA11111 MEMO 111111111111MINNINI IMINIIIIIIIIMIll 111=111111=11111=11 MINIM =INN =111=111 111111111111111 1111111111111111 III MIME 1111=11111 MI A.71111.1r4J•41.1/ fall .V*4111111‘20.1, al/41.1•111.4•11' NT. iMI/411111111111,1 . I all/AllisT1111•11 Mt 11111111 FALI'l 01 1111 MI 1C 1111111111firoll r.:, I/ 1111 INV 'AN 111' LI Ain ANINPIIIIiiii1W,11 Ig.,1 N'IMINI 111111M111 11111111111111111NNIM MUM 11111111111 iiimmil miimmiumms isimmi IINNIIMIll Nom= =Nom miimmit MIMI =11111111111111111111111/5! .1,125/5.19=TIINP1 M =II= MIME' •=111111•1 MEM III, IIIIIME al AI rift T./AIME,* li T1.11 d11•11•111 11111111Milibk461■21111:1111111100M=11111• =MN MIMI IMIIIII1 MIIIIIM 111•11•111•111MM MIMI •11=11 MIIIIIIIIIIIM11/.. .. . 11”1111P.1_ III ..119IMPAP_RF mom wr.n iii al el', 1111 I kvil as in 4 exile I al 'al itilIM I 0 LIMN MINN MIIIPIIMIPIIPMIMNMMMIIIMMIMMIIIIIMMINMIMIIIMMUINIIMINIMIIINIIIININNIIMIMNNII NM= ii Nazi in: ribl:re Di ol o min:royAl 11111111:. '111111,21!1:11;11r.ictstacommom 111=111111111.1111,1., 1•1111111111,111111141•11110111111•11111111 litialliallialiglialia [AE21111= IIIIININMI•1111M11IIIIIIIIIMMIIINMI i i 9111:.Liir 11=‘111 Mr - t - TIM ME•Till LIME i'l4Tak :111M i MUM= IMMI71211111111111 •11111FAVALIT41=1 MI WI= =I t I • log "'s • • • • CURVE "A" = Gz° 39 5 5" R= 410.00 L = 448.42 12 /3 C I .4 Imo • ". e ';„1 13 •••%4 1,1j - • 4:t. ./3 1 0 14 1 I 5 4 78. oG 7 T- N N 0 J1 6' 15 3 BLOC 1 15.0 9 0.00 6 BLOCK 16 2 10• 5 0 e 6 ( Ro o 17 L lt - 6 - ; 0 .34 9.7 ° x A 18 50 Scale in Feet 0 50 TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION: NO SCALE 100 4- (f) w 0 w a .1C . 1C 1 \ Grass Sod 10.0 \3. w 5 1 O. 0 t .5 o 2.5.0 Asphoskt Cohcrete- Pavement - Class "1:5: Compacted Depth Asphalt Content 5 to G (%1.5. Spec.) NOTES : Stop Sign 4 Road Name. Sign: Spokane County S Road Name_ Sign SpoKane. CoLkyrt Standard Private Road and Deadend Sign 1 Spokane. Count Standard P■kl signs Sh 0.11 be. 1ocoted c spe_ced the. M anual oi Uniform "Tros-Hic. Coh-tho1 Devices. Street signs sho.11 be installed after r ‘v\ Sto,11o, In oi - the c_urb and pvenient. Utilities shall be retocated prior +o cote-is-true:Hoyt. 18.0 ,„,.oz. FT/FT. 18 . 0 • oz FT/ FT 25.0 Crushed Surfacing Jo? Course - G" Compacted Depth S.D.O:T. S "Tvpe... "X' Cement Concrete Curb, So-o he Coun-k- Standard RAN - 7.o ogaff 13.0 1.5 H4,5 9.o -•zs TBM Small spike in power pole at NW. corner of 24 . th Avenue and Sullivan Road . ELEV. 2030.285 5 o i- t E 0) cs uJ Grass Sod - r9pica.1 Section : Drainage Pond 1` b e. cons where shown on ?tans . See. Draino:ge. Poor hee.. - 1 . 3 af 3 or Fond bottom dimensions. HIGHWAY FEDERAL AID SHEET PLATE 1-SINGLE PLAN AND PROF1LE-FULL LINE ''OTELEDYNE PRINTED IN U.S.A. r _26 A one second theodolite and an EDM were used for this survey A field traverse was used for this survey • s , SCALE IN F eee (-) This map direction n : 82 R = 20.00 T = 17.42 L = 28.67 /-"\.= 78'36'01" R = 20.00 T - 16.37 L = 27.44 1 - 1 , T , I. 50 c : • - - 1318.35 - -- A tr. 11..1 ,FOUND PK NA IL. /-1.3p, 's ( X 2 S.0UT14 OF CURB ER, N 35 42.65 N Al L B. 'TA G 17 353 IN PP N4 809 , 4 6.93 X 7 4' E. AST OF ER CURB N 5.9 E 5 3 58 curve, data - 87'03'12" = 20.00 = 19.00 = 30.39 = 62'39'55" R = 410.00 T = 249.60 L = 448.42 647 . ""cr) ro 0 0 0 z 0 z tv-1 A co CY o - Co CO • 0 a survey made by me = 8419'27" = 20.00 T - 18,11 L - 29.44 n = 4330'00" R - 410.00 T = 163.57 L = 311.28 0 CO S 89*2022 2166 4 12000 f ts , e0 / 'S / 0° 7 \ , 7 , • SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE 3 218.00 2 \ • \ 11 '30 GRAINAGE ' • k I ,r?, a UTILITY ! \ • , 1 "'"' MENT \ ■ / e' c." . /' ;*c ah , , OttlailnatEMBICtiirt3=31118541133erMatitealgilfia. 389'32:42"E ,, , ',/91-•:.) Charles E. SimpSon p & L.S. #9961 Professional Eng11 ,-.4, ad Surveyor )Y3/91 or under my correctly represents in conformance with the requirette-- of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. 44a = 52 R = 15.00 T = 7.32 L = 13.62 333....temseramelaxerearotswitenestenegmemewavnammeneeze.....sezets3....Vownmeserescaeree.mene.. . e vo t rmearaweeen . prmArmaemseenonewateansorreeterelaemmafesen.....3.33werewxceAst.eeteeMes.33-1.-Nreenneevure.35m e 3=4,314311 3 .30twe l wo e . 2 8.00 , 30 1 1 / / et\e / 4 19' ,,.. , ..„ / ,..;= ,e, • '),/ c`-' ' t ‘ 1 , 0 , • r C C' / • i' ''/- ,..' 1 /LI \ ...,,..., „ 0 , ., re,; f .; ,.--=.7 -,‘ \• 0 b , n , e p / - i'.')‘ -)---...\ , 0 , c'...,,,, 7--'' . c-' \ : -,--- f , ' - a re i ......- .." - ..,'..-- • '3---- -- ■ , r.1 :\,rt,\.), \ , \ 4.,. \ . • „, `. , ,,,, GE T BACK L. I NE 7 A , ., v. , ' \ ','-' ....e ./ .. -- 1 \ r \ ' 1 32 42 -372.85, - 24th - --187L50-- LEE 4 1 "1 25 s 6 I. I 0 ! 1 ,a01-'," kr) • I ; 0 2;.u- " - ..-- 'kt I /3 \ _ ( „, 67 / f 03 _ / l / / / ' 1.1/ % I DRAINAGE a UTILITY E ASEME NT n = Set 1/2" rebar, cap # 8642/9967 or as noted Found 1/2" rebar, cap # 8642/9967 or as noted • = Subdivision boundary - t 1 00 4 0 (1) 33 DRAINAGE AND UT ILITY EASEf3iEN _., .- t9 :3 DRAI'"NAGE. AND UTILITY EASEMENT 4 / 6 BLOCK (3) A ") \\N :NN / _13 DRAINAGE AND (14 / /' urit_nry EASEMENT k e • ‘/‘ t),/ 9ts 0 010 . M t STATE OF WASHINGTON)SS COUNTY OE SPOKANE My cmmission. expires o89' 2022"E 216.00 -- 27'on,.., if) ., ?'70 ----- - 04 (-.--, c R) ----- COURep. ir) 8 ..*-..... w R.750 13 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT „.• ir 5 ‘E - 1 552.57 -EASEMENT 292.57- ■, er,,, . I I ■ ,- i i L., , • -----.4 - ---,.-- \ ,\ ,\ ,. \-.v -,,K ....--- \ .‹ :,----- ` -.-\----' 1 tr \ \ I 1 „ DRAINAGE AND "' 1 UTILITY EASEMENT \ co "FOUND PK NAIL EDGEME -180.30°- BASS OF BEAM UNPLATTED. AVENUE 0 500 6 On this ' .. day of ., n :nn...: , 1991, before me personally appeared Kenneth 3. Tupper known to be Managing Partner of Sullivan South Enterprtses, a Washington partnership, and also known to be President of Tupper and Associates, Inc. as the individUai who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged the same to be his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes herein mentioned. Kenneth J. Tupper presented evidence that he is authorized to represent all the partners in said partnership. IN OITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my and and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at . Washington 50 00 26 2 I 51.90 ne bearing of S 89 a.ong the centerline of 24th Avenue . per Ridgemont Estates as recorded in Book 12, page 36 of Plats in Spokane County was used as the Basis of Bearing for this plat. . SET BACK t‘IE 2.60 -- (1 6 0'52: 25' t r . A k 1'4 1. i IS' ORA! NAGE ANC; UTILITY EASEMENT 3 1 .. 3 , / r- 4°35'17" f. 410.00 , T: 16 .42 \ L 32 .83 1 / 7- FOUND 5/8" REBAR b e WEST LINE OF RDGEMONT 7 ESTATES 1 1 5 5 -- °e9 3 „( 8 C3' 17" W(R) _ FOUND 1/2" REBAR c/) 7000 CV FOUND 1/2" REBAR 1 4116 ° 1 / FOUND 1/2" REBAR FOUND 1/2" REBAR IN CONC. Spokane COunty' Engineer Examined ad approved 4th lot areas LOT BLOCK 1 2 3 1 4 1 1 2 2 3 2 4 5 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 2 10 2 11 2 12 2 13 COUNTY OFFICIALS I hereby certify that the taxes en the herein platted land have been paid this es day of 1*'2i,a .:asfe. ,1991 o e soes By_ ,-% ,'„, ,- 4' f _ , . Spokane County Treasurer Deputy -e Ealmined, and approved this , ,,,, ,,,, ,: 7 _,,1 7.7 ,i 7 ' ,/;-/,62 ) , ., . ( 3 2 --.' - Spokane 'County Assessor :U Deputy ,A ,, ,,, , ,q Examined approVed this of s essssne r. . . " Spokane County Utilities Director , a Examined and approved this ,a,:ase-s. 'day asf Spokane Count y Planning Department Director Exa d and apprfayedthi c.14 day of r 4 - )okane County Health bistri„ thealth Officer Examined and approved this Spokane Coxinty- Commissioners Chairman 21,723 32s239 31,475 28,467 20,995 21,238 23,109 28,398 38,559 25,621 21,992 28,801 16,997 AREA 21,720 SQ. 17,599 SQ. 16,132 SQ. 13617 SQ. SQ. SQ. SQ. SQ. SQ. SQ. SQ. SQ. SQ, SQ. SQ, SQ. SQ. FT. FT. FT. FT. FT. FT. FT. FT. FT. FT. FT. FT. FT. FT. FT. FT. day of day of of KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Sullivan South Enterprises, a Washington Partnership and Tupper & Associates, Inc., have caused to be platted into lots, blocks and streets the land shown hereon as "RIDGEMONT ESTATES No 4 7 2nd ADDITION" and described as follows: That portion of the NW 1/4 of Section 25, T. 25 N., R. 44 E.W.M. described asfoIlowSU Begin at the Southeast corner of Lot 5i Block 4, RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO 4 - 1ST ADDITION as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 19 of Plats, page 27 in Spokane County, Washington; thence the next three courses and distances Along the Westerly line of said Ridgemont Estates No 4 - 1st Addition, N 0039'38"E a distance of 286.77 feet; thence N 20 a distance of 73.38 feet; thence N 30 a distance of 125.00 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 4, Block 3 of Said Ridgemont Estates No 4 - 1st Addition; thence N 2328 a distance of 80.73 feet; thence N 00 a distance of 212.37 feet; thence S8920'22"E a distance of 218.00 feet; thence S 472108"E a distance of 67.27 feet; thence S 8920'22"E a distance of 500.60 feet to the West line of Ridgemont Estates as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 36 in Spokane County Washington; thence the next two courses and distances along said West line of Ridgemont Estates, S 1913'09"W a distance of 209.65 feet; thence S 1610'39"W a distance of 522.69 feet to the North right of way line of 24th Avenue; thence N 89 along said right of way a distance of 552.57 feet to the Point of Beginning. Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. The public water system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building and Safety Department, and water purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider/sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire lot. to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for No more than one dwelling unit shall be plaeed on any one lot , nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without first filing a replat. Individual driveway access permits will be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway . approaches to the County road system. The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. Lot 5 Block 1 as shown hereon is dedicated to Spokane county to be deeded for road purpases forever at such time as adjacent property is platted. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. The plattor does hereby dedicate forever the streets shown hereon for public road purposes. Utility easements as shown are hereby granted. Direct access to 24th Avenue from lots is prohibitedte A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. ' WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or otherwise service the private roads contained within or provide service to the property described in this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequentlyb allowing a building permit to be issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road, and the ownerS hereby ackngwledge, that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct alter, repair, improve, maintain or provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner(s), their heirs, successors or assigns, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road's - 1 os Provided herein. , '' ' 4 The private road, as shown hereon, is an easement which provides a means of ingrss and egress or ' ! Lot 3 and Lot 9 of Block 2 and is subject to the seperate DECLARATION OF COVENANT as recorded - _ 1 which by under Auditors Document No. reference is made a part hereof. Drainage easements, as platted and shoyn hereon, which are for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of rbnoff, are hereby - - granted. The County of Spokane is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all drainage easements adjacent to the public right-of-way. The property owner shall maintain the drainage swale with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and/or trees, aich do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage swale as indicated by the approved plans. The property owner or his representative shall inform each succeeding purchaser of all-drainage easements on the property and his responsibility for maintaihing drainage facilities with said easements. Individual driveway access permits shall be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. Driveway approaches-shll be constructed in accordance with the'aproved plan on file in the County Engineer's office. No access is allowed across the 9 foot Wide drainage ponds as shown on the drainage p with the County Engineer. • .4 ■ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set our hand and affixed my seal this day of taae:0„see'e- ,1991 *rare 11991 er • 1991 1 ,1991 Tupper & Asseciates Inc. Kenneth J. TuPpe Prekident 14921.2, 7.1 2 41 1 . 1 %." ^ A41 1 .1 13 2 1 v.011 , ......22.516.104...03MLUVISOSMISIS • _ . Kenneth J. Tuppe,r, managing Partner , yi ss .;,e4.ezef. Sullivan South Enterprises FINAL PLAT R IDGEMONT ESTATES NO. 4 - 2nd ADDITION A PLAT IN A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 251"25N, R44 EWM SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON an on fije • CLARENCE E SIMPSON ENGINEERS INC. N.909 ARGONNE ROAD PH: 9261322 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99212 reemaaer...scomeulenerzessewswevemmesurver4r.kcemewetummat,L.,semen.v.e.e