Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PE-1206-78
04/09/1984 Hearing: 01/30/1979 Technical Review: Preliminary Review: Date Received: 01/15/1979 Signed Name: KENNETH TUPPER Project Status Final As Built Plans Received Road flans Approved New Road Standards 5 -15 -95 Mylar #: Project Name SUMMERFIELD EAST ADD Site Address S. FORKER, W. PROGRESS, E. REES, N. WELLESLEY, Applicant Kenneth Tupper Conditions Mailed: I /i5 / r7 3 FIVE FIFTY LLC Flood Zone No 122 N. Raymond Water Source Sewer Source SPOKANE, WA 99206 - Phone (509) 217 -1052 School Dist 361 Fax (509) 924 -1211 Fire Dist Phone Dist Building 477 -3675 /Planning 477 -7200 /Engineer 477 -3600 Date Submitted ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET Type: Owner Kenneth Tupper FIVE FIFTY LLC 122 N. Raymond SPOKANE, \VA 99206 - Phone (509)217 -1052 Fax (509) 924 -1211 Contact B/P JOHN PEDERSON Description Plats File #: PE -1206 Companion Files: ZE- 0202 -78 Related Files: Building Dept: ❑ Harvard Rd Plan ❑ Eng Special Fees ❑ Large Lot Bldg. Square Feet No. Lots: 268 No. Acres: 91 Range - Township- Section: 44 - 26 - 35 I'ARCEL(S): (first 20) 46353. Company Engineer CLC ASSOCIATES INC 707 W. 7th Av , 200 SPOKANE, WA 99204 Phone (509)458 -6840 Fax (509)458 -6844 Contact Eng SCOTT ENGELHARD -78 Initials Eng Need Technically Complete Eng Need Harvard Rd Mitigation Traffic Analysis Eng Need Other Eng Need Drainage Plans Eng Need Eng Agree Pay Fees Received Eng Final Plat Fees Completed Plat Fees Completed Copy to Accounting Eng Agree Priority Fees Received Eng Prelim / / Notice to Public / Notice to Public # 1 3 4 6 Completed - or Needs to be signed Design Deviation Dates (In -Out) / / - / / / / - / / / / - / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / Bond quanues for drainage item calculated 01/30/1979 Hearing Date Decision Approved App _ Den Cond Appld BCC Appld Court Appld Appealed to BCC Decision App Den Cond Appealed to Court Decision App Den Cond / / Stamped Mylars to Secretary (Sandy) / / Stamped 208 Lot Plans to Secretary (Sandy) kil5 / Q5 - 1�-�[ p O!J at - e /()/J4 5eAA 1-0 pI (4 NNI/✓ l B pp�I CGNI El „,.fCC 04/09/1984 Hearing: 01/30/1979 Technical Review: Preliminary Review: Date Received: 01/15/1979 Signed Name: KENNETH TUPPER Project Status Final As Built Plans Received Road flans Approved New Road Standards 5 -15 -95 Mylar #: Project Name SUMMERFIELD EAST ADD Site Address S. FORKER, W. PROGRESS, E. REES, N. WELLESLEY, Applicant Kenneth Tupper Conditions Mailed: I /i5 / r7 3 FIVE FIFTY LLC Flood Zone No 122 N. Raymond Water Source Sewer Source SPOKANE, WA 99206 - Phone (509) 217 -1052 School Dist 361 Fax (509) 924 -1211 Fire Dist Phone Dist Building 477 -3675 /Planning 477 -7200 /Engineer 477 -3600 Date Submitted ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET Type: Owner Kenneth Tupper FIVE FIFTY LLC 122 N. Raymond SPOKANE, \VA 99206 - Phone (509)217 -1052 Fax (509) 924 -1211 Contact B/P JOHN PEDERSON Description Plats File #: PE -1206 Companion Files: ZE- 0202 -78 Related Files: Building Dept: ❑ Harvard Rd Plan ❑ Eng Special Fees ❑ Large Lot Bldg. Square Feet No. Lots: 268 No. Acres: 91 Range - Township- Section: 44 - 26 - 35 I'ARCEL(S): (first 20) 46353. Company Engineer CLC ASSOCIATES INC 707 W. 7th Av , 200 SPOKANE, WA 99204 Phone (509)458 -6840 Fax (509)458 -6844 Contact Eng SCOTT ENGELHARD -78 Initials CHECK PR( t4T [Kt 1 -7 7 c.•ufo r L _ 4 -eo FIKtM. PLAT Ih4 out PLAT C LO 5 U Q.E /� 6,... a '79 d e4 8 ^8 - 19 ROAD NAME sC klEoK L4co 6 Z- - I' °° c e_ / -i AD?ACEMT �QE A e>4 g -2- ?9 V 6 k 6_2771, Re Port e -2-47 e V Kt' ,IN A6E . AT SE.W CttEct< P RtNT 'N cnuso Rohm pl./kki‘ PtoftLE FINhL DRAW IMGS iN , our DRalt.LkGE EKG IMEER to %PecTto4 EKGIKEE t PEVE Lo PER RO AD Bo RD DR AIM kGE Bo t4 D• COOnctY Et44e, SIGNET PLAT To PLkg a %Re MOMU MEKT Bo MD 1 1 5utNit\EEFIECD EAsT R E A.Ne- K 5 : Z� ' r r" c. "L$ 0". 42).,„4 a-4 k jih'r W ae si o 3) to Cameo Et . F2.-1 72.2^ 13o0 7 0 I pry Po a-D, 117.v y DE N ec t N • 3•9.-"re 1►02-1 tbaTio4 Wet_ — petiv4i owA[EQ2'if //e - P , m-6E PircJLE.l 4-4-0 r r✓rcYz Ro44) - Go.4.ti y -ci 4-/m' SS it- Do elivir OA.n -,.,, wEC - r Des,5 t Tye - ie Plc et S«rcvt-D dF ,¢.�prCEO. I l2 -4-FPiL - Two MaOo2 /1vrE2Sec to.,I P/20 B�E� CF).-7 •'L� Paco/as r AJECLaLEY • ' ?flea& .-, . ,✓mss > ' SfG✓a -c..S - CABS 6✓A'/r/,.'6 t 4. Sic- cs am-e- is/c.d./Actor/ray t4SE CO c SPa&isoia 77 5 Fj,.R6E - 5e ,/ /riC 4a'r / - a o.✓ 402ShCel. Sc r400c..S - Pao Pesa -< kXa- o ✓E2 L4AD 3csfoocs. M-'cu.ci,✓6 SrvB pan-0s - OF 4c50 5PaAY , 4/ 44. accES r N'S / 9,1pn2.r'/, w.v.✓rs 8449WEP, Mk m ca,✓ Y 6r7/62 Pfie «a2%7 od/,11E/2.t oil ulgr / DDcs iCt ,OoA,e1 . lib cT- To ci&DF S 4ocy -rot tea-T- e pcovi/ ?}RS scs r "lN 6- Sunseti Lc>a'cte2i - C V S&oL r reseurwoop &.e r c.'a 2 e-Y Scj-koc - P 3c' ziy G COPiactimi fms $to Oa5ac.. ca/a 2EQ.11tE .4.vo77/1512 econcaimaY 5c-40 pi- Th seta" SCE ox A/EED Pow / DisTx -tqr is NCGoc'4 -fl./4. Sc °G. j n°"'e/ €LeneD o /Lor Erc .,v LEq✓ or ,PEO /Ct 7/?. . E-°PErc.s .t- D/sTricr eisre .✓o r C o4 /Goo'a Pa ax. NEEDS Cep ---• -✓ ✓r �/ Pp2✓` T.; SE2A/c` ,./LEA- . Ak Fu✓.os (ct/L. Part.K Bufi•✓6 5A/ce /A96 8 • SrA?✓ S /rrpz - ILEG remr/ j /ct /Y/tIte /6Y % se 44o -So,wo h& .,C5• D( /,,,✓e Yawatsr nu 9tE PL,/.,., d.wi. /-',4-5 02,4- MOe (?LAr! paoPA> '- • 3Pfv." 5 1 key - iCE - e ( ) rP OFF S .OF C;07,31tTY ENO JEER ., SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON : � - Date _. J JR w/i/.4 2Y S. 19 ]S Inter- office Communication To '• PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ • From GARY KENNALY, PLANNING & TRAFFIC DIVISION ENGINEER 7d`"'F • Subject ROAD CONDITIONS * FOR • PLAT PE • 120Go Si v, n_e tF�Et•o .Ssr •CONDITIONS CIRCLED APPLY- TO PLAT UNDER CONSIDERATION PUBLIC R A - - PRIVATE -ROAD STANDARDS ' ©•that conditional approval of the ",plat is given subject to dedication of Right of Way and approval of the road system in the plat by the 'County Engineer ; + i hit - plene,'profiles, • and,cross'sections showing.propoeed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to ' bonatruction and•tbe filing of a final plat; • hat drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to,the County. Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat; construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision,of,.a,liceneed land surveyor, who shall be responsible for perpetuating all evidence of the location'of survey monuments-which may be disturbed during construction and who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that '..0',.a11 improvements were installed to•the lineand grades shown•on.-the`,approved construction plans and that all disturbed e, turbed monuments have been replaced; o''constructioh work is.'to be performed within the Public Right of_Nay until a permit has beer issued by the County Engineer. All work ie-subject"to inepectioaand - approval by the County Engineer; 0 11 construction within the Public Right of Way. is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or_a bond in the_ amount•estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construct:o: ' of improvemente,'conetrtiction certifioitioa, "As-Built" plans;• and.aonumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer; E 7 -no direct access from lots to 1/2 Right'of until roade•are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads; o direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed to County Standards and establiehed.es•County, Roide; oad design, construction, and drainage control foi 1/2 Rights of'Ways and Stub Road con- nections are the responaibility,of the Developer; E10 -that the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal acceptable to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway - County- Roadlintereection.. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be reoeived prior to the filing o&•the- .final plat..- 1.Improvements'to the State'.Highway- er'e•to -be the responsibility of the Sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnished to the County Engineer,-in- theramount,as :determined by the,County Engineer and the State __eu6aJyG Department. that a roads- withixr the prat be ;curbed paved to:the epeoifications of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved curbed•.to, the standards of the .County' Engineer.. • E12- Proposed . private road(s) serving lots with: no extension possible; ____ extension to serve 8 or' lees lots; ' 'filature piubli'c=Right'of Way-tract.' •'''" ` ' • E13 -that private,road(s) be improved to standard adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. (E19 direct access from lots to Wtnct.eY jj6 VoE a,✓a Pj IQea3 1c rg ast0 E15- dedication of 020 additional Right of Way ,along / 6ttot Ra•od? E16 -that the owner, his grantees and assigns agree to participate in and not oppose or protest an RID on - • Rite to re it REOES7W 41,3Of AtESSR L1'oriO IA/ TEiLs7 AT ad p -_ S t E rt.44 Sz..✓0 4245 f4 ,t'n h'/d e+e ;Am a Cel /CGeOQ *L rezta t :Waco AE oSFO. {Revs+'& SO' /21.9LUs RK INNIINVEINEENPR C77t--0F -Sacs £iceirS or c✓•Y, Rem VIDE .67.0C‘14-LCS q to',c P erefae4 r 120.J re xis .OESiwiiTi as/ 7/e Ce..nY E- 4,aeez I ,q.,,t t ts.'c ,c.)ec emey .4'g -✓ve. Pawns STu8 ,2e040 Co.v iecTiO4 T3 .77/E eves: rb Amass CtA,Ttrl of 71.4cr /03 4—t Sbwrlr oG T.•c- //,P, /1 7 &S BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST FOR PE- 1206 -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST, AN APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Five Fifty, LLC, c/o Ken Tupper, has been received and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulations (Section 12.100.118) and RCW 58.17.140. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by the Director of the Spokane County Division of Planning. 2. The original proposal was to subdivide approximately 91 acres into 268 lots for single family dwellings with a Zone Reclassification from Agricultural (A) to Single Family Residential (R -1). 3. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on January 30, 1979. 4. The proposal is generally located north of Wellesley Avenue, south of Forker Road and west of Progress Road in Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. 5. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5), previously established as Agricultural (A) zoning in 1961 and re- designated to Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) on January 1, 1991 consistent with the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code, and remains unchanged by adoption of the Phase I Development Regulations on January 15, 2002. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the proposal does conform to the requirements of the existing UR -3.5 zone. 6. The Comprehensive Plan designated the area of the preliminary plat as Urban at the time of application acceptance. On August 24, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) adopted a new Spokane County Comprehensive Plan (see Resolution #1- 0799). The new Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property as Low Density Residential. 7. The subject property is located inside of the Urban Growth Area (UGA). 8. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and department policy for short subdivisions. These criteria are found in Section 12.100.118 (Extensions of Time) of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this decision. Section 12.100.118 states that "The Director may administratively approve an extension provided there are no significant changed conditions which would render filing of the plat or binding site plan contrary to the public health, safety or general welfare, and further provided one or more of the following circumstances is found to apply." Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1206 -78 Page 2 1) That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the last extension was granted and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval; RESPONSE: Five (5) phases of the original preliminary plat have been finalized for a total of 159 lots with 109 lots remaining to be finalized. The most recent phase, consisting of 25 lots, was finalized in October, 2002. 2) That the preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan remains generally consistent with the original plat or binding site plan that was approved, and the sponsor has taken substantial steps towards finalizing the plat or binding site plan, which shall include one, but is not limited to, the following: a. surveying the lots within the development; b. arranging for public services to the site; c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan; d. the completion of studies or other requirements which were part ofpreliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan approval. RESPONSE: The preliminary subdivision remains consistent with the original plat that was approved. In addition, the applicant has finalized 159 originally approved lots, with 109 lots remaining. 3) That at the time the preliminary plat approval was granted, development of the proposal was conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This provision shall not apply to public utility extension which the project sponsor would normally fund. RESPONSE: Not applicable. 4) That administrative delays have caused the inability of the applicant to finalize the plat within the jive (5) year time period. - ..RESPONSE: Not applicable. 9. This is the eleventh request for a time extension. The total life of the preliminary plat has been approximately 24 years. 10. The proposal has been circulated to all affected agencies and departments for comment. Additional and/or revised conditions of approval have been recommended by the Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads. These recommended conditions of approval are included below. 11. The applicant/owner should show substantially greater progress toward complying with Section 12.100.18 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time. • Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1206 -78 Page 3 CONCLUSIONS BASED UPON A REVIEW of (a) the criteria for approving an extension of time of the expiration date for a preliminary plat and (b) the above Findings of Fact, the following conclusion is made: The proponent has demonstrated progress toward completing the preliminary plat as evidenced in the above Findings of Fact and there are no significant changed conditions which would render filing of the plat contrary to the public health, safety or general welfare. Therefore, a one (1) year extension of time is warranted. DECISION BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request for application PE- 1206 -78 is hereby approved until February 1, 2004, and subject to those conditions specified by the Division of Planning Findings of Fact, Conclusion and Decision dated January 11, 1996, updated as follows: New conditions are illustrated in bold text and revised conditions are illustrated as or underlines. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING 1. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for one (1) year, specifically to February 1, 2004. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request no later than thirty (30) days prior to the above expiration date. 2. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) zone, as amended. 3. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. 4. A final plat name /number shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name /number to be approved by the Planning Director /designee. 5. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. 6. The Planning Director /designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of approval. 7. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 8. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1206 -78 Page 4 "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat" 9. Four (4) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 10. Prior to filing all or a portion of a final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 11. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 12. The final plat shall indicate yard setbacks arc lengths on cul -de -sac lots which meet or exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat. 13. The Spokane County Planning Department shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following: a. At least 20 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities, in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right -of -way along Forker Road. b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area. c. No required landscaping, parking, `208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities. If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made. d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, sign or others) shall be considered interim uses. 14. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement for those lots located on a stub road or temporary cul -de -sac: "Lot(s) [ ], Block(s) [ ] are located on a temporary cul -de- sac /stub road. This temporary cul -de -sac /stub street may be extended to provide access to adjacent property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as development and/or circulation needs dictate." 15. The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record. 16. Subsequent extensions of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial compliance with Section 12.100.118, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. 17. That the sponsor constructs a 6 foot high chainlink fence around the entire periphery of the retainage basin in the storm drainage plan. • F. Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1206 -78 Page 5 18. That all construction will be monitored by the Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority to insure compliance with air pollution requirements and control techniques. 19. That the sponsor limits the construction activities from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 20. That the sponsor provides and constructs 6 -foot sidewalks excluding curbs (in addition to hose required along the pathways) and bike paths along the plat boundaries of Progress Road, and Wellesley Avenue as required and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 21. That the sponsor construct a 6 -foot chainlink fence along the approximately 900 feet common lot line shared by this proposal and property owned by Tony Danelo, prior to finalizing of any phase of this project. Mr Danelo's property is legally defined as West Farms Irrigated Tracts Plat #4, Blocks 113 and 112. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: 1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to the 2001 Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the surrcnt- edition 1998 of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management, and all other applicable standards. The plans and report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a construction or building permit or approval of the final plat. 3. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 4. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public right -of- way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 5. All construction within the existing or proposed Public right -of -way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements. Construction certification, "As Built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 6. No direct access from lots to stub road connections until such roads are constructed to County standards and established as county roads. 7. Road design, construction, and drainage control for one -half (1/2) rights -of -way and stub road connections are the responsibility of the owner, developer or applicant. Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1206 -78 Page 6 8. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 1 -0298, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 9. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to Wellington Avenue, Forker Road and Progress Road. 10. Dedication of 20 feet of additional right -of -way along Progress Road is required. 11. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at Progress Road. Design standards for neighborhood collection arterial should be used. 12. That the sponsor provide 50 foot radius cul -de -sac rights -of -way. 13. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curb along pathway routes as designated by the County Engineer, and shown on the preliminary plat of record, and along Wellesley Avenue. 14. That the sponsor provide stub road connections, to the west, to access center of Tract 103 and south line of Tract 113 in West Farms Irrigated Tracts. 15. That the sponsor assume responsibility for reconstruction of Progress Road should flooding, caused through activities of the plat, cause damage to the road. 16. That the stub roads to the west be barricaded, by the sponsor, in a fashion acceptable to the Spokane County Engineers. 17. There shall be no further finalization of phases, all or a portion of which is within the Zone -A Floodplain, until engineering work is completed to evaluate the impact of storm water runoff from Forker Draw as predicted in newly released FEMA maps and reports. Storm water management plans shall be developed prior to finalization of any further phases. 18. A bond for the anticipated engineering inspection and certification portion of the project shall be posted with the County Engineer prior to plan acceptance. 19. Condition No. 18 in Spokane County's Finding of Fact and Conclusions for PE- 1206 -78, Sumerfield East are hereby amended as follows: a. Within the development all lots shall be required to have site plan showing lowest adjacent grade and lowest opening at least 2 feet above curb elevation for residence and concrete garage slab at lease 18 inches above curb elevation. b. Each lot will require a floodplain development permit prior to any development (to include grading, filling, excavating, paving, construction and other development activities). c. Plat shall contain language identifying the area as a flood hazard area, alerting homeowners of the requirements for developing within the floodplain. d. No further plat encroachment or finalization of phases may occur within the Zone A Floodplain without a CLOMR. Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1206 -78 Page 7 20. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified. 21. "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities." "The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work." 22. Erosion Control: A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) plan shall be prepared by a WA State licensed Professional Engineer and implemented throughout the duration of construction. The TESC plan is to be prepared using best management practices (BMP's) currently accepted within the Civil Engineering profession. The TESC plan is to include, • at a minimum, a grading plan, location and details of silt control structures, and street cleaning program. Runoff from exposed areas shall be filtered prior to discharging into a detention pond, swale, infiltration facility, or natural drainageway. The TESC plan is to be included in the road and drainage plans. The applicant's Engineer is to submit the TESC plan and supporting calculations to Spokane County prior to site disturbance. The TESC major structures (such as silt ponds, silt traps) are to be installed prior to other site work and the TESC measures are to be implemented and maintained throughout the duration of construction, including house construction. 23. Any part of the drainage system that lies outside of the public right -of -way will neither be maintained nor operated by Spokane County forces. Prior to plan acceptance by the County Engineer, the Sponsor shall provide a mechanism, acceptable to the County Engineer, for the perpetual maintenance of the stormwater drainage system. This mechanism shall also provide for the funding of routine maintenance and the replacement of the various components of the drainage system at the end of the service life of the respective components, and any other improvements that may be legally required in the future. An Operations and Maintenance Manual for the stormwater management system shall be prepared by the Sponsor's Engineer, and included in the project documents submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance, along with a discussion of the design life of the various components, a calculated annual cost for repair and maintenance, and a calculated replacement cost. Homeowners Associations are accepted by the Spokane County Engineer for carrying out the required maintenance functions and responsibilities. 24. Appropriate provision shall be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A one (1) -foot strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul -de- sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries of the final plat.) 25. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the county road system. 26. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1206 -78 Page 8 27. The County Engineer has determined that this project permit is exempt under the Phase I Development Regulations — Section IV (B) (2b). Future time extensions will require review by the Spokane County Division of Engineering for concurrency with the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITES 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on- site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for "Spokane County, as amended. 3. Each new dwelling unit shall be double - plumbed for connection to future area wide collection systems. SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT 1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any attached sheets as noted. 2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane Regional Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each lot of the plat. 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (puryeyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with 4 Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1206 -78 Page 9 their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan hat appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. 10. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane Regional Health District that suitable sites for on -site sewage disposal systems are available on all lots within the approved preliminary plat not already finalized. 11. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of on -site sewage systems may be authorized. 12. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health officer, the use of on -site sewage systems may be authorized." 13. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 14. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system, as approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire district and purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." DATED THIS 17 DAY OF JANUARY, 2003 di Tammy Ain Associate Planner Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with a processing fee, payable to the Spokane County Division of Planning, within ten (14) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Spokane County Division of Planning at 477 -7200. Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1206 -78 Page 10 c: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads; Scott Engelhard Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement Ken Tupper, Five Fifty, LLC, 322 N. University Rd., Spokane, WA 99206 BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION ) OF TIME REQUEST FOR PE- 1206- 78 /ZE- 202 -78 ) FINDINGS OF FACT SUMMERFIELD EAST, AN APPROVED ) CONCLUSIONS AND PRELIMINARY PLAT AND ZONE ) DECISION RECLASSIFICATION ) THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Five Fifty, LLC, c/o Ken Tupper, has been received and decided upon, pursuant to Section 12.100.118 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and RCW 58.17.140. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by the Director of the Spokane County Division of Planning. 2. The original proposal was to subdivide approximately 91 acres into 268 lots for single family dwellings and a Zone Reclassification from Agricultural (A) to Single Family Residential (R -1). 3. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on January 30,1979. 4. The proposal is generally located north of Wellesley Avenue, south of Forker Road and west of Progress Road in Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 E. W .M. Spokane County, Washington. 5. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5), previously established as Agricultural (A) zoning in 1961 and re-designated to. Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) on January 1, 1991 consistent with the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the proposal does conform to the requirements of the existing UR- 3.5 zone. 6. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. Portions of the preliminary plat adjacent to Forker Road are affected by the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan. Implementation of the arterial road plan will require reservation of a Future Acquisition Area and special setbacks adjacent to Forker Road. On August 24, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners adopted a new Spokane County Comprehensive Plan (see Resolution #1-0799). The new Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property as Low Density Residential. Adoption of Phase I Development regulations on January 15, 2002 did not change the zoning for the subject property and the existing Urban Residential -3.5 (UR- 3.5) zone remains effective. 7. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions. These criteria are found in Section 12.100.118 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. Section 12.100.118 states, "The Director may administratively approve an extension of time provided there are no significant changed conditions which would render the filing of the plat or binding site plan contrary to the public health, safety or general welfare, and further provided one or more of the following circumstances I found to apply." The following are the relevant sections of Section 12.100.118 and the Division of Planning response: Jt 1. That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the last extension was granted and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval; RESPONSE: Four phases of the original preliminary plat have been finalized for a total of 135 lots with 133 lots remaining to be finalized. Additional phases have not been submitted for final plat review. 2. That the preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan remains generally consistent with the original plat or binding site plan that was approved, and the sponsor has taken substantial steps towards finalizing the plat or binding site plan, which shall include one, but is not limited to, the following: a. surveying the lots within the development, b. arranging for public services to the site, c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary plat subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan, d. the completion of studies or other requirements, which were part of preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan approval; RESPONSE: The preliminary plat is generally consistent with the original preliminary plat, and the applicant has conducted engineering and geological investigation to document desired amendments to current flood plain boundaries /designations. (See Division of Engineering condition #19.) The applicant has also prepared engineering reports for construction of a stormwater management system. In addition, the applicant is preparing a final plat (for 55 lots) for review by Spokane County. A "draft" revised final plat map of the Summerfield East 4 Addition was submitted to the Division of Planning on March 22, 2001. These plans must be accepted by Spokane County prior to finalization of any further phases. 3. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was conditioned upon the extension of public services, which are not yet available. This provision shall not apply to public utility extension, which the project sponsor would normally fund. RESPONSE: Not applicable. 4. That administrative delays have caused the inability of the applicant to finalize the plat within the five (5) year time period. RESPONSE: Administrative delays in resolution of the current flood plain boundaries and designation have prevented finalization of the remaining portions of the preliminary plat. 8. Additional conditions have been recommended by reviewing agencies and departments, including the Spokane County Division of Engineering. 9. This is the tenth request for a time extension. The total life of the preliminary plat has been approximately 22 years. 10. The following facts are also relevant. a. Section 12.100.118 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance states "the Director may grant one three (3) year time extension that may include any additional or altered conditions and requirements recommended by affected agencies. Additional one (1) year time extensions may be granted by the Director beyond the initial three (3) year extension. Based on the above, the applicant is advised that future time extensions may only be granted upon demonstration of compliance with the extension criteria identified by Section 12.100.118 and for one (1) year increments. 11. The applicant/owner should show substantially greater progress toward complying with Section 12.100.18 of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time. PE•1206-78 Summerfield East, Extension of Time Page 2 of 10 0 DECISION BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request for application PE- 1206- 78 /ZE- 202 -78 is hereby APPROVED until February 1, 2003 and subject to those conditions specified by Division of Planning Findings of Fact, Conclusion and Decision dated January 11, 1996, updated as follows: New conditions are illustrated in bold text and revised conditions are illustrated as ike- through or underlines. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING -& PLANNING (UPDATED) 1. Subsequent extension of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial compliance with Section 12.100.118, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. 2. The preliminary plat is given a time extension for one (1) year, specifically to February 1, 2003. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request at least thirty (30) days prior to the above expiration date. 3. The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record. 4. The preliminary subdivision shall comply with the Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) zone as amended. 5. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. 6. The Planning Director /designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 7. A final plat name shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name /number to be approved by the Planning Director /designee. 8. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. 9. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 10. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 12. Four (4) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Division of Planning prior to filing the final plat. 13. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 14. The Spokane County Planning Department shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right -o €way and utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following: a. At least 20 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities, in addition to the existing and /or newly dedicated right -of -way along Forker Road. PE- 120678 Summerfield East, Extension of Time Page 3 of 10 system, 15. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement for those Tots located on a stub road or temporary cul-de-sac. "Lot(s) [ ] , Block(s) [ ] are located on a temporary cul -de- sac /stub road. This temporary cul -de- sac /stub street may be extended to provide access to adjacent property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as development and/or circulation needs dictate." 16. The final plat shall indicate yard setback are lengths on cul -de-sac Tots, which meet or exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat. b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area. c. No required landscaping, parking,' 208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road right-ofway and utilities. If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made. d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses. . a system, welfare. 17. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. PE- 120678 Summerfield East, Extension of Time Page 4 of 10 18. That the sponsor constructs a 6 foot chainlink fence around the entire periphery of the retainage basin in the storm drainage plan. 19. That all construction will be monitored by the Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority to insure compliance with air pollution requirements and control techniques. 20. That the sponsor limits the construction activities from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 21. That the sponsor provides and constructs 6 -foot sidewalks excluding curbs (in addition to those required along the pathways) and bike paths along the plat boundaries of Progress Road, and Wellesley Avenue as required and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 22. That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink fence along the approximately 900 feet common lot line shared by this proposal and property owned by Tony Danelo, prior to any finalizing of any phase of this project. Mr. Danelo's property is legally defined as West Farms Irrigated Tracts Plat #4, Blocks 113 and 112. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: 1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of rightof- way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. the -land action. 2. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to the 2001 Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management, and all other applicable standards. The plans and report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a construction or building permit or approval of the final plat. 3. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 4. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public rightof -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. PE- 1206 -78 Summerfield East, Extension of Time Page 5 of 10 5. All construction within the existing or proposed Public righfof- -way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to corer the cost of construction of improvements. Construction certification, "As Built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 6. No direct access from lots to stub road connections until such roads are constructed to County standards and established as county roads. 7. Road design, construction, and drainage control for one-half (1/2) rights -of -way and stub road connections are the responsibility of the owner, developer or applicant. 8. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 1592 1 -0298, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 9. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to Wellington Avenue, Forker Road and Progress Road. 10. Dedication of 20 feet of additional right -of -way along Progress Road is required. 11. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at Progress Road. Design standards for neighborhood collection arterial should be used. 12. That the sponsor provide 50 foot radius cul-de -sac rights -of -way. 13. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curb abng pathway routes as designated by the County Engineer, and shown on the preliminary plat of record, and along Wellesley Avenue. 14. That the sponsor provide stub road connections, to the west, to access center of Tract 103 and south line of Tract 113 in West Farms Irrigated Tracts. 15. That the sponsor assume responsibility for reconstruction of Progress Road should flooding, caused through activities of the plat, cause damage to the road. 16. That the stub roads to the west be barricaded, by the sponsor, in a fashion acceptable to the Spokane County Engineers. 17. There shall be no further finalization of phases until engineering work is completed to evaluate the impact of storm water runoff from Forker Draw as predicted in newly released FEMA maps and reports. Storm water management plans shall be developed prior to finalization of any further phases. 18. A bond for the anticipated engineering inspection and certification portion of the project shall be posted with the County Engineer prior to plan acceptance. PE- 1206 -78 Summerfield East, Extension of Time Page 6 of 10 course: 19. Condition No. 18 in Spokane County's Finding of Fact and Conclusions for PE-1206-78, Sumerfield East are hereby amended as follows: a. Within the development all lots shall be required to have site plan showing lowest adjacent grade and lowest opening at least 2 feet above curb elevation for residence and concrete garage slab at lease 18 inches above curb elevation. b. Each lot will require a floodplain development permit prior to any development (to include grading, filling, excavating, paving, construction and other development activities). fleedplain. c. Plat shall contain language identifying the area as a flood hazard homeowners of the requirements for developing within the floodplain. d. No further plat encroachment or finalization of phases may occur within the Zone A Floodplain without a CLOMR. 20. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified. 21. "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding PE- 1206 -78 Summerfield East, Extension of Time Page 7 of 10 area, alerting these utilities." "The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work." 22. Erosion Control: A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) plan shall be prepared by a WA State licensed Professional Engineer and implemented throughout the duration of construction. The TESC plan is to be prepared using best management practices (BMP's) currently accepted within the Civil Engineering profession. The TESC plan is to include, at a minimum, a grading plan, location and details of silt control structures, and street cleaning program. Runoff from exposed areas shall be filtered prior to discharging into a detention pond, swale, infiltration facility, or natural drainageway. The TESC plan is to be included in the road and drainage plans. The applicant's Engineer is to submit the TESC plan and supporting calculations to Spokane County prior to site disturbance. The TESC major structures (such as silt ponds, silt traps) are to be installed prior to other site work and the TESC measures are to be implemented and maintained throughout the duration of construction, including house construction. 23. Any part of the drainage system that lies outside of the public right- of-way will neither be maintained nor operated by Spokane County forces. Prior to plan acceptance by the County Engineer, the Sponsor shall provide a mechanism, acceptable to the County Engineer, for the perpetual maintenance of the stormwater drainage system. This mechanism shall also provide for the funding of routine maintenance and the replacement of the various components of the drainage system at the end of the service life of the respective components, and any other improvements that may be legally required in the future. An Operations and Maintenance Manual for the stormwater management system shall be prepared by the Sponsor's Engineer, and included in the project documents submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance, along with a discussion of the design life of the various components, a calculated annual cost for repair and maintenance, and a calculated replacement cost. Homeowners Associations are accepted by the Spokane County Engineer for carrying out the required maintenance functions and responsibilities. 24. Appropriate provision shall be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A one (l }foot strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul-de -sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries of the final plat.) 25. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the county road system. 26. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT I. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and /or any attached sheets as noted. 2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane Regional Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. PE- 1206 -78 Summerfield East, Extension of Time Page 8 of 10 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each lot of the plat. 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County/City of Spokane, Spokane Regional Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot/tract purchaser refused a building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 10. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane Regional Health District that suitable sites for on -site sewage disposal systems are available on all lots within the approved preliminary plat not already finalized. 11. Subject to specific application approval and issuance ofpermits by the health officer, the use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems may be authorized. 12. The dedicatory language of the plat will state: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of on -site sewage systems may be authorized." 13. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 14. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system, as approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire district and purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on- site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Each new dwelling unit shall be double - plumbed for connection to future area wide collection systems. PE- 1206 -78 Summerfield East, Extension of Time Page 9 of 10 DATED THIS / 7 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2002 n Pederson, Senior Planner Pursuant to ESHB -1724 and Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 1 -0700, this document is also considered the NOTICE OF DECISION. Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with the appropriate processing fee payable to the Spokane County Division of Planning; within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 477 -7200. c: Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads, Scott Engelhard Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads, John Hohman Spokane County Division of Utilities, Jim Red Spokane County Stormwater Utility, Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District, Steve Holderby Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement, Jeff Foray Ken Tupper, Five Fifty, LLC, 322 N. University Rd., Spokane, W A 99206 CLC Associates, 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200, Spokane, WA 99204 PE- 1206 -78 Summerfield East, Extension of Time Page 10 of 10 BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST FOR PE- 1206 -78/ ZE- 202 -78; SUMMERFIELD EAST, AN APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Kenneth Tupper has been received and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance Section 12.100.118 and RCW 58.17.140. 1. 2 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by the Spokane County Division of Building & Planning Director. The original proposal was to subdivide approximately 91 acres into 268 lots for single family dwellings and a zone reclassification from Agriculture (A) to Single Family Residential (R -1). 3. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on January 30, 1979. a. The proposal is generally located north of Wellesley Avenue, south of Forker Road and west of Progress Road in Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44EWM, Spokane County, Washington. 5. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) previously established as Agriculture (A) zoning in 1961 and redesignated to Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) on January 1, 1991 consistent with the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the proposal does conform to the requirements of the existing UR -3.5 zone. 6. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the . location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. Portions of the preliminary plat adjacent to Forker Road are affected by the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan. Implementation of the arterial road plan will require reservation of a Future Acquisition Area and special setbacks adjacent to Forker Road. 7. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions. These criteria are found in Section • 12.100.118 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance (effective 1/1/97). Section 12.100.118 states, "The Director may administrative approve an extension of time provided there are no significant changed conditions which would render the filing of the plat or binding site plan contrary to the public health, safety or general welfare, and P Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1206- 78 /ZE- 202 -78 Page 2 further provided one or more of the following circumstances is found to apply." The following are the relevant sections of Section 12.100.118 and the Division of Building & Planning response. 1. That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the project was approved and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval; RESPONSE: Four (4) phases of the original preliminary plat have been finalized for a total of 135 lots. 133 lots remain to be finalized. No phases have been finalized subsequent to the previous extension of time. 2. That the preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan remains generally consistent with the original plat or binding site plan that was approved, and the sponsor has taken substantial steps towards finalizing the plat or binding site plan, which shall include one, but is not limited to, the following: a. surveying the lots within the development, b. arranging for public services to the site, c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan, d. the completion of studies or other requirements which were part of preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan approval; RESPONSE: The preliminary plat is generally consistent with the original preliminary plat, and the applicant has conducted engineering and geological investigation to document desired amendments to current flood plain boundaries /designations. Completion of engineering work to evaluate stormwater runoff from the Forker Draw is a specific requirement/condition imposed on the preliminary plat (see Spokane County Division of Engineering Condition No. 18). The applicant has also prepared engineering reports for construction of a stormwater management system. In addition, the applicant is preparing a final plat (for 55 lots) for review by Spokane County. These plans must be accepted by Spokane County prior to finalization of any further phases. 3. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This provision shall not apply to public utility extension which the project sponsor would normally fund. RESPONSE: Not applicable. 4. That administrative delays have caused the inability of the applicant to finalize the plat within the five (5) year time period. RESPONSE: Administrative delays in resolution of the current flood plain boundaries and designation have prevented finalization of the remaining portions of the preliminary plat. 8. Additional conditions have been recommended by reviewing agencies and departments, including the Spokane County Division of Utilities, Spokane County Division of Stormwater Utility and the Spokane County Division of Engineering. Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1206- 78 /ZE- 202 -78 Page 3 9. This is the ninth request for a time extension. The total life of the preliminary plat has been approximately 20 years. 10. The following facts are also relevant. a. This extension of time is the first extension request to be processed under the Spokane County Subdivision ordinance adopted on December 17, 1996 and effective on January 1, 1997. Section 12.100.118 of said ordinance states that "the Director may grant one three (3) year time extension that may include any additional or altered conditions and requirements recommended by affected agencies. Additional one (1) year time extensions may be granted by the Director beyond the initial three (3) year extension. Based on the above, the applicant is advised that future time extensions may only be granted upon demonstration of compliance with the extension criteria identified by Section 12.100.118 and for one (1) year increments. 11. The applicant/owner should show substantially greater progress toward complying with Section 12.100.118, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time. DECISION BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request for application PE- 1206- 78/ZE -2 -278 is hereby APPROVED until February 1, 2002 and subject to those conditions specified by Findings of Fact, Conclusions & Decision dated January 11, 1996 together with the following updated conditions. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & PLANNING (UPDATED) 1. Subsequent extension of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial compliance with Section 12.100.118, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. 2. The preliminary plat is given a time extension for three (3) years, specifically to February 2, 2002. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request approximately thirty (30) days prior to the above expiration date. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS (UPDATED) Prior To Issuance Of A Building Permit Or Use Of The Property As Proposed: 1. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to all current standards and laws goveming stormwater management in Spokane County. Final drainage plans and a drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a construction or building permit, or approval of the land action. Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1206- 78 /ZE- 202 -78 Page 4 2. The stormwater management systems and roads for this plat shall be constructed and certified to be constructed in accordance with the accepted road and drainage plans, or all the required improvements must be bonded for in accordance with Spokane County regulations, prior to the recording of the final plat. Record drawings and all construction documentation shall be submitted with the proper certification statement. 3. A bond for the anticipated engineering inspection and certification portion of the project shall be posted with the County Engineer prior to plan acceptance. 4. If the project is phased and one phase depends on another phase for access and/or drainage treatment and disposal, the prior phase shall be completed and certified prior to the submittal of plans for the dependent phase of the development. One foot no access strips on public roads will not be released until the subject phase is completed, certified and accepted by Spokane County for maintenance. No access through a non certified and non - accepted phase of the development may be allowed and no plans will be accepted by Spokane County for construction unless the prior phase is completed and certified by the Sponsor's Engineer. 5. Adequate drainage easements, granted to Spokane County and/or an acceptable maintenance entity, must be provided for all elements of the drainage plan, in order that proper maintenance may be performed. Easements for drainage ditches and natural drainage channels shall be wide enough to contain within the easement the runoff from a 50 year, 24 hour storm event for the contributing basin, plus a 30% freeboard. The easement shall also include an adequate maintenance access for the drainage course. 6. Condition No. 18 in Spokane County's Findings of Fact and Conclusions for PE -1206- 78, Summerfield East are hereby amended as follows: a. Within the development all lowest floors, including basement floors shall be at or above elevation 2036, as this floodplain has been delineated as an alluvial fan, the structures shall be constructed to withstand any expected debris flow. b. All lots created must have a suitable building area outside the limits of the Zone A floodplain. c. Development shall only occur within the Zone B without further floodplain analysis. Development includes, but is not limited to buildings or other structures, grading, excavating, filling, paving. F000dplain Development Permits shall be obtained for all development partially or wholly within the Zones A or B. d. Scaling off the map is not acceptable, surveyed elevations shall be used to delineate the floodplain boundary. The east flank of the floodplain must be defined by engineering analysis if it is intended that development will occur in this are. e. The plat shall contain language identifying the area as a flood hazard area, alerting homeowners of the requirements for developing within the floodplain. f. Roads may not be constructed within the Zone A without further information being supplied to the engineer's Office to show safe ingress and egress during a 100 year event, and no impact to the floodplain due to road development. Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1206- 78 /ZE- 202 -78 Page 5 g. No further plat encroachment or finalization of phases may occur within the Zone A Floodplain without applying for, obtaining and completing the requirements for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES (UPDATED) 1. The current Guidelines for Stormwater Management need to be met. DATED THIS 2 / 6 DAY OF JANUARY, 1999. HN W. PEDE SON nior Planner Pursuant to ESHB -1724 and Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 96 -0293, this document is also considered the NOTICE OF DECISION. Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with the appropriate processing fee payable to the Spokane County Division of Building & Planning, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Division of Building & Planning at 477 -3675. c: Division of Engineering Division of Utilities Regional Health District Kenneth Tupper, Sponsor Inland Pacific Engineering Co., Surveyor BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST FOR SUMMERFIELD EAST PE- 1206 -78, ZE- 202 -78 AN APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT. THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Ken Tupper has been received and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter III. Section G) and RCW 58.17.140. FINDINGS OF FACT 1 . The individual signing below has been properly delegated decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning. 2. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing 30, 1979. CONCLUSIONS FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION the responsibility for rendering this Examiner Committee on January 3. The original subdivision request included a zone reclassification from Agricultural (A) to Single Family Residential (R -1) under the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code specified Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) zoning for those properties that are; 1) located within the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan and; 2) within the Urban Impact Area and; 3) with Agricultural (A), Agricultural Suburban (AS), or Single Family Residential (R -1) zoning prior to January 1, 1991. The current zoning of the property is Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) which is consistent with the original application to Single Family Residential (R -1). 4. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and department policy for short subdivisions. These criteria are found in Chapter III, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this decision. 5. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. Unfinished portions of the Summerfield East adjacent to Forker Road are affected by the County's adopted Arterial Road Plan. The Department will require designation of Future Acquisition Area and special setbacks along the Forker Road frontage to implement the Arterial Road Plan. 6. No additional conditions have been recommended by the various reviewing agencies and departments, including the County Engineer's Office, County Health District, County Utilities and the Department of Building & Safety. 7. This is the seventh request for an extension of time. The total life of the preliminary plat has been approximately 13 years. Four (4) phases of the preliminary plat have been finalized for a total of 135 lots with 133 lots remaining. Additional phases have not been submitted for final review since the previous time extension approval on November 15, 1989. 8. The applicant has indicated preliminary engineering work is in progress for additional phases of development. Q, Thi extension ^. Of time is granted based upon T^: ^:"" progress. Most serious r., .. .....^ G uvG of progress toward finalizing should be shown or future extensions will likely not be granted. BASED UPON A REVIEW of (a) the criteria for approving an extension of time of the expiration date for a preliminary plat and (b) the above Findings of Fact, the following conclusions are made. 1. A three year time extension is justified. 2. The applicant/owner should show continued progress toward complying with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time. Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1206 -78 BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request for application PE- 1206 -78 is hereby APPROVED until November 1, 1995. , SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (UPDATED) 1. The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record. 2. The preliminary subdivision shall comply with the Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) zone as amended. 3. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of Lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. 4. The Planning Director /designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 5. A final plat name shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name /number to be approved by the Planning Director /designee. 6. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. 7. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 8. The preliminary plat is given a time extension for three (3) years, specifically to November 1, 1995. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request approximately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 9. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal'of the final plat. 10. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 11. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 12. The Spokane County Planning Department shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following: a. At least 20 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities, in addition to the existing and /or newly dedicated right -of -way along Forker Road. b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area. c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities. If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made. REV 1ry0 DECISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Page 2 Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1206 -78 Page 3 d The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses. 13. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement for those lots located on a stub road or temporary cul -de -sac: "Lot(s) [ ] , Block(s) [ ] are located on a temporary cul -de -sac /stub road. This temporary cul -de- sac /stub street may be extended to provide access to adjacent property and /or connect to existing roads or new roads as development and/or circulation needs dictate." 14. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul -de -sac lots which meet or exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat. 15. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. 16. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 17. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant to the Water Flan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision or binding site plan, and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 18. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state - licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat," including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as- built" water system. 19. The Water Plan and the above four (4) conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director /designee upon receiptof letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 20. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 21. Subsequent extension of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial compliance with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance; otherwise the preliminary subdivision approval will become null and void. 22. That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink fence around the entire periphery of the retainage basin in the storm drainage plan. 23. That all construction will be monitored by the Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority to insure compliance with air pollution requirements and control techniques. 24. That the sponsor limit the construction activities from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 25. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curbs (in addition to those required along the pathways) and bike paths along the plat boundaries.of Progress Road, and Wellesley Avenue as required and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. REV 1/90 Extension of Time Findings, File No. PE- 1206 -78 Page 4 26. That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink fence along the approximately 900 feet common lot line shared by this proposal and property owned by Tony Danelo, prior to any finalizing of any phase of this project. Mr. Danelo's property is legally defined as West Farms Irrigated Tracts Plat #4, Blocks 113 and 112. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT (UPDATED) 1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. Plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as- built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right -of- way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 6. All construction within the existing or proposed public right -of -way is to be completed prior to filing each final plat, or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "as- built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 7. No direct access from lots to stub road connections until such roads are constructed to County standards and established as county roads. 8. Road design, construction, and drainage control for one -half (1/2) rights -of -way and stub road connections are the responsibility of the owner, developer or applicant. 9. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which resolution establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 10. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to Wellington Avenue, Forker Road, and Progress Road. 11. Dedication of 20 feet of additional right -of -way along Progress Road is required. 12. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at Progress Road. Design standards for neighborhood collection arterial should be used. 13. That the sponsor provide 50 foot radius cul -de -sac rights -of -way. 14. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curb along pathway routes as designated by the County Engineer, and shown on the preliminary plat of record, and along Wellesley Avenue. 15. That the sponsor provide stub road connections, to the west, to access center of Tract 103 and south line of Tract 113 in West Farms Irrigated Tracts. 16. That the sponsor assume responsibility for reconstruction of Progress Road should flooding, caused through activities of the plat, cause damage to that road. 17. That the stub roads to the west be barricaded, by the sponsor, in a fashion acceptable to the Spokane County Engineers. REV 1/90 Extension of Time Findings File No. PE- 1206 -78 Page 5 18. There shall be no further finalization of phases until engineering work is completed to evaluate the impact of storm water runoff from Forker Draw as predicted in newly released 1 maps and reports. Storm water management plans shall be developed prior to . finalization of any further phases. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT (UPDATED) 1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any attached sheets as noted. 2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each lot of the plat. 7. • Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve'the plat. 8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County/City of Spokane, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot/tract purchaser refused a building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 10 Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that suitable sites for on -site sewage disposal systems are available on all lots within the approved preliminary plat not already finalized. 11. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health officer, the use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems may be authorized. 12. The dedicatory language of the plat will state: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of on -site sewage systems may be authorized." 13. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 14. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system, as approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire district and purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." REV 1/90 Extension of Time Findings SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on- site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2: Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Each new dwelling unit shall be double - plumbed for connection to future areawide collection systems. \PAUL F. JENSENN Senior Planner DATED THIS DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1992. File No. PE- 1206 -78 Page 6 enclosure Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with $100 processing fee,to the Spokane County Planning Department, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456 -2205. kc /tv c: County Engineer County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety Ken Tupper, Windermere/Tupper Realty, E. 12929 Sprague Avenue, Spokane, WA. 99216 Inland Pacific Engineering, S. 25 Altamont, Spokane, WA. 99202 File REV 1/90 BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN THE MA 1 I ER OF AN EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST ASSOCIATED WITH ZE- 202 -78 AND PE- 1206 -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST AN APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Ken Tupper, has been received and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation, more specifically based on RCW 58.17.140 Chapter III, Section G. FINDINGS OF FACT Pe v FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and department policy for short subdivisions. 3. Such extensions of time may be up to and including three -year extensions. 4. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on January 30, 1979. 5. The original zoning approval was from Agricultural zoning to R -1 zoning. 6. If finalization of this plat does not occur prior to January 1st, 1991, the existing zoning will be changed to the appropriate New Zone,' which may allow different uses and standards. 7. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation remains the same. 8. Since the original approval of the subdivision and since the last time extension in 1986, the County has adopted an arterial road plan which would affect the unfinalized portion of Summerfield East along Forker Road. The Planning Department is requiring future acquisition area for road and utilities improvements and special setbacks in anticipation of expansion of Forker Road as a principal arterial. 9. No additional conditions have been recommended by the various reviewing agencies and departments, including the County Engineer's Office, the Spokane County Health District, County Utilities and the Department of Building & Safety. 10. This is the sixth request for a time extension. Four phases, or final plats, have been approved since the preliminary plat approval in 1979: Summerfield East (28 lots), Summerfield East 1st Addition (53 lots), Summerfield East 2nd Addition (19 lots) and Summerfield East 3rd Addition (34 lots). The total number of lots originally approved is 266; the total number of lots finalized to date is 134; 132 lots remain to be finalized. Since the last time extension, Summerfield East 3rd Addition has been finalized. As set forth in Chapter III, Section G, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, approval for an extension of time for up to three years is discretionary, providing some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the last extension was granted and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval. CONCLUSION BASED UPON A REVIEW of the criteria for approving an Extension of Time request, the following conclusion is made. The subdivision shall be allowed a three -year time extension. DECISION BASED UPON THE ABOVE findings of fact and conclusion, an Extension of Time request for Application PE- 1206 -78 is hereby APPROVED until October 1, 1992. PE- 1206 -78 Time Extension Findings and Decision Page 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record. 2. Hearing Examiner Committee Findings and Order dated January 30, 1979 and updated conditions from previous extensions of time, with the following added conditions. 3. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for three (3) years, specifically to October 1, 1992. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request approximately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 4. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 5. Spokane County Planning Department is required to record with the County Auditor a "Title Notice," as prepared and signed by the applicant, for a future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities, to run with the land, and the future acquisition area reservation shall not be removed without prior approval by the Spokane County Planning Department. Notice shall be recorded prior to final plat approval and shall provide the following: a. Twenty (20) feet of future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities, in addition to the existing right -of -way dedication required by the County Engineer, along Forker Road. b. Building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured thirty -five (35) feet from the southerly edge of the Future Acquisition Area that is reserved for road right -of -way and utilities along Forker Road. c. The twenty (20) -foot Future Acquisition Area, until acquired by Spokane County, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfields, signs or others) shall be considered "interim" uses. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said Future Acquisition Area. d. This "Title Notice" shall be signed by the applicant to serve as official notice and acknowledgement of said Future Acquisition Area for road right -of -way and utilities. DATED THIS ( DAY OF 7fl4aJV1 , 19 S I PAUL F. JENSEN Planner 1I Under State Law and County Ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with $100 processing fee, payable to the Spokane County Treasurer, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456 -2205. mo c: County Engineer County Utilities County Health District County Building & Safety Sponsor: Ken Tupper, East 12929 Sprague Avenue, Spokane, WA 99216 Surveyor: Patrick J. Moore, Inland Pacific Engineering, South 25 Altamont, Spokane, WA 99202 Enclosure rebruary 3, 1983 ;-' Findings & Order SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee on February 3, 1983 and the members of the Committee present being Kathy Carstens, Chairperson, Ron McVicker and Rich Skalstad. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Wm. Main Corp. -TDC, Inc., is requesting approval of an Exten- sion of Time for PE- 1206 -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST and Zone Change ZE- 202 -78, AGRICULTURAL to R -1 for subdivision of 91 acres into 266 lots for single - family dwellings, and there being present, the following applicant or representative: LP1 -CC 1 Robert Fogg File No. PE- 1206 -78 —. immerfield East C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 2. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 3. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disap- proval of the proposed Extension of Time. 4. That the information in the STAFF REPORT was considered. 5. That progress has been made toward finalization of this preliminary plat. 6. That the provisions of State Subdivision law establishes three (3) year approval for preliminary plats. D. SPECIAL EXPLANATION OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS DECISION 1. Those conditions as listed in the February 3, 1983 STAFF REPORT. rebruary 3, 1983 File No. PE- 1206 -78 •r Findings & Order 'immerfield East E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application for PE- 1206 -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST and Zone Change ZE- 202 -78, AGRICULTURAL to R -1 for an Extension of Time is hereby APPROVED to March 1, 1986. LP1 -CC Motion by: Ron McVicker Seconded by: Rich Skalstad Vote: UNANIMOUS Kathy Carstens - Aye Ron McVicker - Aye Rich Skalstad - Aye ATTEST: JOHN NUNNERY Subdivision Administrator 2 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE. A. INTRODUCTION SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER ROBERT FOGG ZE- 202 -78 This matter having come before the Spokane County Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee on January 28, 1982 and the members of the Committee present being Jerry Williams, Chairperson, Jane Myers and Eldon Thomas. B. PROPOSAL The sponsors, William Main Corp. & TDS, Inc., are requesting approval of an Extension of Time for PE- 1206 -78, Sumrnerfield East and ZE- 202 -78, Agricultural to R -1 for subdivision of 91 acres into 266 lots for single family dwellings and there being present, the following applicant or representative: C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with., 2. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 3. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disap- proval of the proposed Extension of Time. 4. That the sponsor demonstrated that progress has been made toward finalizing this plat. D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS EXTENSION OF TIME APPROVAL: Those conditions within the January 28, 1982 Staff Analysis. 1 E. ORDER The Hearking Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of PE- 1206 -78, Summerfield East and ZE- 202 -78 Agricultural to R -1, for an Extension of. Time request is hereby approved to February 1, 1983. ATTEST: Motion by: Jane Myers Seconded by: Eldon Thomas Vote: Unanimous to Approve. Jerry Williams aye Jane Myers - aye Eldon Thomas - aye JOHN NUNNERY Subdivision Adminis rator Hie No. rr-IGuu-,u ZE- 202 -78 EAR I N G EXAMINER , " , �+COMMITTEE �p i i „1:ZerAe.—.1 E d fit A. INTRODUCTION B. PROPOSAL C. FINDINGS OF FACT SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on .January 29, 1981, and the members of the Committee present being John Culler, Chairperson, Kathy Carstens and Ted Mccoury. The sponsors, William Main Corporation and TDC, Inc., are requesting approval of an Extension of Time and Zone Change, PE- 1206 -78, Summerfield East and ZE- 202 -78, Agricultural to R -1 for .subdivision of 91 acres into 266 lots for single family dwellings and there being present, the following applicant or representative: ROBERT FOGG AND DICK MASON 1. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 2. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 3. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor dis- approval of the proposed Extension of Time. 4. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) That reasonable progress has been made toward finalization of phases of the plat and therefore the Extension of Time should be granted. D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTIGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS EXTENSION OF TIME APPROVAL: PLANNING DEPARTMENT n. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record. 2 . That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting a time extension to review any preliminary plat approval. All extensions applied for may subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing Agencies. 3. That a time extension be granted to February 1, 1982. 1 e No. PE- 1206 -78 ZE- 202 -78 ENGINEER DEPARTMENT 1 This preliminary plat is subject to the provisions of Attachement "C" - Fee Schedule Office of the County Engineer - pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution #80 -1592 of December 22, 1980. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ,1 . ,• A n s. No. PE- 1206 -78 ZE- 202 -78 Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. The owner, his heirs and successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. Any. water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area - wide collection systems. • A dry sewer system is to be constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer have been reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of William Main Corporation and TDC, Inc., for an Extension of Time, Summerfield East and Zone Change as described in the application should be approved. Motion by: McCoury Seconded by:. Carstens Vote: Unanimous to Approve (3 -0) HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE ATTEST: • WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Director By: l� z:vP pg(Ulleri2cJij Date: 79) 2 Chairperson �_ry24 l /l 10/l ice! 1-; 9 - -D SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER a) Progress has been made toward finalizing the plat. 1 e No. PE- 1206 -78 ZE- 202 -78 A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on January 29, 1980 and the members of the Committee present being Eldon Thomas, Chairperson, Ted McCoury and John Culler. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, W. Main Corporation, is requesting approval of an Extension of Time and Zone Change, PE- 1206 -78, Summerfield East and ZE- 202 -78, Agricul- tural to Single Family Residential (R -1) for subdivision of 91 acres into 266 for single family dwellings and there being present, the following applicant or representative: RICHARD MASON, ENGINEER REPRESENTING SPONSOR C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 2. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 3. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor dis- approval of the proposed Extension of Time. 4. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTIGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS EXTENSION OF TIME APPROVAL: /f'. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting an Extension of Time to review any preliminary plat approval. All extensions applied for may subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing Agencies. 1 4 3? That a Time Extension be granted to February 1, 1981. E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of W. Main Corporation for an Extension of Time, PE- 1206 -78, Summerfield East and Zone Change as described in the application should be approved. Motion by: Culler Seconded by: McCoury Vote: 3 -0 ATTEST: FRED L. DAYHARSH Planning Director 2 NG EXAMINER COMMITTEE '/ - ,. �N- -- Chairman HEA No. PE- 1206 -78 ZE- 202 -78 B. PROPOSAL C. FINDINGS OF FACT /- 30- 27 Ale No. PE- 1206 -78 ZE-202 -78 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on January 30, 1979, and the members of the Committee present being Eldon Thomas, Ted McCoury, and Chairperson, Abby Byrne. The sponsor, William W. Main, is requesting approval of a preliminary plat and zone change PE- 1206 -78/ Summerfield East, and ZE- 202 -78, Agricultural to Single Family Residential for subdivision of 91 acres into 268 lots for single family dwellings and there being present, the following applicant or representatives: STANLEY SCHULTZ - RICHARD MASON 1. That the existing land use in the area is cultivated land. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as residential. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is agricultural. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. - No. PE- 1206 -78 ZE- 202 -78 6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 7. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 8. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use is not detrimental to the general purpose or otherwise harmful) to the public health, safety, and welfare. 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposed use. 10. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) That the adequate provisions have been made for school sites and playgrounds as well as parks by the sponsor's negotiations with East Valley School District and the Spokane County Parks and Recreation Department. Further, that evidence at the hearing indicated that the sponsor agreed to pursue and finalize' those provisions as presented at the hearing. D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTIGENCIES APPLICABLE -TO THIS SUBDIVISION APPROVAL: If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated separately and listed hereafter ti 01 That the plat be designated as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and /or attached sheets as noted. 2 ��j 4. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property tf c o] \ be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1 strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one dwelling structure be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided, for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing - a replat. That the plat provide for right of way width for streets as indicated on the preliminary plat of record. That appropriate street names be indicated. ile No. PE- 1206 -78 ZE- 202 -78 6 That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to. the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 3 File No. PE-1206 -78\ ZE- 202 -78 The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of G the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat dedication will contain` a statement to the effect that the public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each • lot prior to sale of each lot. �IY8 That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to EE the filing of the final plat. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to February 1, 1980. .J ��I That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the dedication of right of way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat by the County Engineer. 4 '1°V ��That' plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerline ` and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. The drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. e•Ci 7T3.i Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who shall be responsible for perpetuating all evidence of the location of survey monuments which may be distrubed during construction and who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. ✓✓(>4;) No construction work is to be performed within the Public Right of Way until a permit has been issued by the .County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 1 icy All construction within the Public Right of Way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover' the cost or construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines, shall be filed with the County Engineer. 5 rile No. PE- 1206 -78 ZE- 202-78 '.r -k,4 approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. Special Conditions 6 ile No. PE- 1206 -78 ZE- 202 -78 ✓R6? No direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads. 1 Road design, rough grading construction, and drainage control for rights of ways and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the developer. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the proposed water district. 20 That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution No. 77 -1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Board of County Commissioners, with regard to the preliminary plat approval; as instructed by the Planning Department staff. 21.; That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning be reclassified to Single Family Residential. • 7 J2,. That project sponsor is responsible for requesting a time extension to �� review any preliminary plat approval. Ile No. PE- 1206 -78 ZE- 202 -78 That a public water system serviced by Trentwood Irrigation District 143, and including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. "�C4. That an on-site sewage management system be created and approved by �����///// the Health Office prior to the signing of the final plat, if more than a total of 318 dwelling units are authorized within the plat. That final. construction plans for on -site storm drainage facilities be reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer and the County Health District. . 26.. The dedicatory language of the plat will state that each lot is authorized the use of an individual on -site sewage disposal system. � That all public roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifi- cations of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of The plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. That no direct access be allowed from lots to Wellesley Avenue and Progress Road and Forker Road. 7 That the owner dedicate 20 feet additional right -of -way along Forker Road. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at Progress Road. Design standards for neighborhood collection arterial should be used. 1_ the sponsor provide 50 foot radius cul -de -sac rights -of -way. 32. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curb along pathway routes as designated by the County Engineer, and shown on the preliminary plat of record, and along Wellesley Avenue. / a3 That the sponsor provide stub road connections, to the west, to access center of Tract 103 and south line of Tract 113 in West Farms Irrigated Tracts. that road. File No. PE- 1206-78 ZE- 202 -78 17 \ That the sponsor assume responsibility for reconstruction of Progress Road should flooding, caused through activities of the plat, cause damage to /1 %..- , 0,. That the stub roads to the west be barricaded, by the sponsor, in a fashion acceptable to the Spokane County Engineers. J � 36� That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink fence around the entire periphery of the retainage basin in the storm drainage plan. 8 s�F File No. PE- 1206 -78 ZE- 202 -78 y 39 That'the use of the park money, donated to the County by the sponsor, be used for parks and park improvements within a two -mile radius of this proposal. 2 That all construction will be monitored by the Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority to insure compliance with air pollution requirements and control techniques. That the sponsor install sediment basins and drywells consistent with the Spokane County Waste Water Management Plan .. -- P Does 4ssa.k+e st.. /OJ That the sponsor limit the construction activities from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. ' That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curbs (in addition to those required along the pathways) and bike paths along the plat boundaries of Progress Road, and Wellesley Avenue and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. )..p 2 ' a V 1 rl ` 9 nvrt CX:S'f ' C ' e2 Or as required Vv \4 That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink fence along the approximately 900 feet common lot line shared by this proposal and property owned by Tony Danelo, prior to any finalizing of any phase of this project. Mr. Danelo's property is legally defined as West Farms Irrigated Tracts Plat #4, Blocks 113 and 112. J 47 . 3. The temporary use of an individual on -site authorized only until an area -wide operating /yi`� 4. Each structure from which sewage is to issue shall connected to collector individual on -site sewage disposal is authorized pending availability of an operating area -wide sewerage system. of sewage into the collector lines until controlling the collector lines. lines intended to serve the area even though use of 5. The subdivider and persons with any interest in the plat will not protest a local improvement district for improvements as may be initiated by resolution of municipality. Dry sewerage lines as approved and required municipality shall be installed in the platted developed. 10 File No. PE-1206 -78 ZE- 202-78 sewage system on each lot is sewerage system is available. be plumbed and The plumbing shall prevent entry authorized by the operating agency As a consideration for the acceptance of this plat by the Board of Commissioners, the owners of all non - public platted into lots, blocks or tracts agree not to protest 35.43.180 RCW the construction of, or legal assessment ultimately serving their non - public property as such time the governing municipality to construct such sewers. property within this sanitary sewer the governing by the governing property as same is Spokane County property herein under 36.94 or for, any sewer it is desired by The agreement herein expressed shall be considered a covenant to run with the land and shall be carried as a provision of each and every deed drawn to transfer ownership of any and all property delineated within this plat. The dedicatory language of the plat shall include language as indicated in orci Conditions #43, 44, 45, 46 and 47 above E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of William W. Main for a preliminary plat, Summerfield East, and zone change from Agricultural to Single Family Residential as described in the application should be approved. Motion by: McCoury Seconded by: Thomas Vote: Unanimous ATTEST: FRED L. DAYHARSH Planning Director By: 7 11 ,e No. PE- 1206 -78 ZE- 202 -78 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE airman Page' 1 Engineers Sn :, auCT TO: FROM: DATE: PROJECT: FILE #: OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 (509)477 -3600 Fax (509)477 -2243 Spokane County Division of Planning Division of Engineering & Roads January 15, 2003 SUMMERFIELD EAST PE- 1206 -78 Review Date: Planner: Sponsor /Applicant: Section Township Range: Hearing Date: Technical Review Date: "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" EXTENSION OF TIME 01/13/2003 TAMMY JONES KENNETH TUPPER 35 -26 -77 () ( @) The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order /Decision" should the request be approved. Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: 1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to the 2001 Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the rr� nt edition 1998 of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management, and all other applicable standards. The plans and report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a construction or building permit or approval of the final plat. 3. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 4. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public right -of -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. CC: Applicant KENNETH TOPPER Engineer /Surveyor Planner TAMMY JONES Page ` 2 1206 5. All construction within the existing or proposed Public right -of -way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements. Construction certification, "As Built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 6. No direct access from lots to stub road connections until such roads are constructed to County standards and established as county roads. 7. Road design, construction, and drainage control for one -half (1/2) rights -of -way and stub road connections are the responsibility of the owner, developer or applicant. 8. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 1 -0298, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 9. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to Wellington Avenue, Forker Road and Progress Road. 10. Dedication of 20 feet of additional right -of -way along Progress Road is required. 11. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at Progress Road. Design standards for neighborhood collection arterial should be used. 12. That the sponsor provide 50 foot radius cul -de -sac rights -of -way. 13. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curb along pathway routes as designated by the County Engineer, and shown on the preliminary plat of record, and along Wellesley Avenue. 14. That the sponsor provide stub road connections, to the west, to access center of Tract 103 and south line of Tract 113 in West Farms Irrigated Tracts. 15. That the sponsor assume responsibility for reconstruction of Progress Road should flooding, caused through activities of the plat, cause damage to the road. 16. That the stub roads to the west be barricaded, by the sponsor, in a fashion acceptable to the Spokane County Engineers. 17. There shall be no further finalization of phases, all or a portion of which is within the Zone - A Floodplain, until engineering work is completed to evaluate the impact of storm water runoff from Forker Draw as predicted in newly released FEMA maps and reports. Storm water management plans shall be developed prior to finalization of any further phases. 18. A bond for the anticipated engineering inspection and certification portion of the project shall be posted with the County Engineer prior to plan acceptance. Page • 3 1206 19. Condition No. 18 in Spokane County's Finding of Fact and Conclusions for PE- 1206 -78, Sumer East are hereby amended as follows: a. Within the development all lots shall be required to have site plan showing lowest adjacent grade and lowest opening at least 2 feet above curb elevation for residence and concrete garage slab at lease 18 inches above curb elevation. b. Each lot will require a floodplain development permit prior to any development (to include grading, filling, excavating, paving, construction and other development activities). c. Plat shall contain language identifying the area as a flood hazard area, alerting homeowners of the requirements for developing within the floodplain. d. No further plat encroachment or finalization of phases may occur within the Zone A Floodplain without a CLOMR. 20. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified. 21. "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities." "The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work." 22. Erosion Control: A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) plan shall be prepared by a WA State licensed Professional Engineer and implemented throughout the duration of construction. The TESC plan is to be prepared using best management practices (BMP's) currently accepted within the Civil Engineering profession. The TESC plan is to include, at a minimum, a grading plan, location and details of silt control structures, and street cleaning program. Runoff from exposed areas shall be filtered prior to discharging into a detention pond, swale, infiltration facility, or natural drainageway. The TESC plan is to be included in the road and drainage plans. The applicant's Engineer is to submit the TESC plan and supporting calculations to Spokane County prior to site disturbance. The TESC major structures (such as silt ponds, silt traps) are to be installed prior to other site work and the TESC measures are to be implemented and maintained throughout the duration of construction, including house construction. 23. Any part of the drainage system that lies outside of the public right -of -way will neither be maintained nor operated by Spokane County forces. Prior to plan acceptance by the County Engineer, the Sponsor shall provide a mechanism, acceptable to the County Engineer, for the perpetual maintenance of the stormwater drainage system. This mechanism shall also provide for the funding of routine maintenance and the replacement of the various components of the drainage system at the end of the service life of the respective components, and any other improvements that may be legally required in the future. An Operations and Maintenance Manual for the stormwater management system shall be prepared by the Sponsor's Engineer, and included in the project documents submitted to the County Engineer Page • 4 1206 END for acceptance, along with a discussion of the design life of the various components, a calculated annual cost for repair and maintenance, and a calculated replacement cost. Homeowners Associations are accepted by the Spokane County Engineer for carrying out the required maintenance functions and responsibilities. 24. Appropriate provision shall be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A one (1) -foot strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul -de -sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries of the final plat.) 25. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the county road system. 26. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. 27. The County Engineer has determined that this project permit is exempt under the Phase I Development Regulations — Section IV (B) (2b). Future time extensions will require review by the Spokane County Division of Engineering for concurrency with the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan. TO: A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DIVISION OF PLANNING MEMORANDUM Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads; Scott Engelhard c/o Sandy Kimball Spokane Division of Engineering, Development Services; John Hohman Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement; Jeff Forry Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 Trentwood Irrigation District East Valley School District No. 361 FROM: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner L DATE: January 3, 2003 SUBJECT: Extension of Time for PE- 1206 -78; Summerfield East The Spokane County Division of Planning has received the attached request for an Extension of Time for the preliminary plat of Sumnierfield East, PE- 1206 -78. If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe that additional conditions should be made part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward your comments to me by January 16, 2003. Enclosures c: Ken Tupper, 122 N. Raymond, Spokane, WA 99206 MAIL STOP PWK -1 • 1116 W. BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0220 PHONE: (509) 477 -7200 • FAX: (509) 477 -2243 • TDD: (509) 477 -7133 SPOKE COUNTY FOR EXTENSION OF T NAME OFPLAT/FIIENO: Summerfield East /PE 1206 -78Cffrip PARCEL NO. 46353.9074; 46354.9050; 46352.9052; 46352.9066; 46351.//yq APPLICANT (NAME OF LEGAL OWNER): Five Fifty, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 122 N. Raymond CITY: Spokane STATE: WA ZIP: 99206 PHONE: (work) 924 -1211 (home) — (fax) 922 -0195 IF APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR THE BELOW OWNER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE OWNER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT: Kenneth-IS: Tupper MAILING ADDRESS: 122 N. Raymond CITY: Spokane PHONE: (work) 924 -1211 STATE: WA (home) 1. Has any portion of the plat, short plat or BSP been finalized (recorded)? Yes, see attached. Page 1 of 2 Application for Extension of Time DIVISION OF PLANNING L ZIP: 99206 (fax) 922 -0195 2. Has a proposed final plat, short plat or BSP been submitted to the Division of Planning? Yes X No If no, why has the plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized? What has been the delay? see at 3. What progress has occurred: What conditions of approval have been completed (such as survey work, improvements constructed, departmental approvals obtained)? See attached. J 4. Why has the plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized? What has delayed finalization? See attached. 5. Is this a phased project? Yes X No If yes, please complete the following information: No. of lots originally approved: 268 No. of phases finalized to date: 5 No. of lots remaining to be finalized: 109 No. of acres remaining to date: 40 CITY: Spokane LEGAL OWNER SIGNATURE (Signature of legal owner or representative as authorized by legal owner) 1, Kenneth Tupper (print name) SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. ADDRESS: Five Fifty, LLC, 122 N, Raymond PHONE: 924 -1211 \'1e- --..P- ,N 91GNA STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE SUBSCRIBE IS WOW fitlott t = = „, o � w m s, `�`'' ,, NOTARY 64N to before me this —g I0 y of 20 �// NOTARY IGNATURE Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at: ciao"( e /o c/ My appointment expires: /l� a/o DATE SUBMITTED: 12142/0 p � L RECEIVED BY II ea`� AMOUNT RECEIVED: " • l { 0 RECEIPT NO. EXT OF TIME APP/WTC/Rev. 101001 STATE: WA ZIP: 99206 Page 2 of 2 Application for Extension of Time December 30, 2002 DATE Q\IYRIpper Ken 85606 Summerfield 2\Attaclunart to Extension oftune .2001.wpd APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME SUMMERFIELD EAST; PE 1206 -78 ATTACHMENT The preliminary plat of Summerfield East was approved for development of approximately 91 acres into 268 lots for single family dwellings. The developer has continually developed the property since it was granted preliminary plat approval. In 1984, " Summerfield East," consisting of 28 Lots was recorded with the Spokane County Auditor. Also in 1984, "Summerfield East First Addition," consisting of 53 lots was recorded with the Spokane County Auditor. In 1985, "Summerfield East Second Addition," consisting of 19 Tots was finalized and recorded. In 1987, " Summerfield East Third Addition," consisting of 34 lots was recorded. Since the last time extension was granted on February 14, 2002, an additional phase has been finalized. The most recent phase, "Summerfield East Fourth Addition," consisting of 25 lots was recorded with the Spokane County Auditor in October, 2002. In total, 159 of the 268 lots have been finalized. There now remains only 109 lots to final plat. The developer has contracted with Wyatt Engineering to complete the engineering and stormwater plans for the remaining phases. A meeting with County Planning, County Engineering, and County Stormwater occurred on December 20, 2002 to discuss the scope of the engineering requirements. Engineering plans are expected to be submitted for approval in 2003. The remaining unplatted property remains consistent with the new Growth Management Comprehensive Plan, which designates the property as Low Density Residential. The property is still zoned Urban Residential-3.5 and is located within the Urban Growth Boundary. The plat sponsor respectfully requests a time extension in order to finalize the remaining acreage of Summerfield East. FileNumber PrjName AudhucAuditor RecoLand A Lots Final Lots P- 1206 -78 SUMMERFIELD EAST ADD 17 9 04/09/1984 Final 268 28 P- 1206A -78 SUMMERFIELD EAST 01ST ADD 17 32 08/29/1984 Final 53 53 P- 12068 -78 SUMMERFIELD EAST 02ND ADD 17 100 04/25/1986 Final 19 19 P- 1206C -78 SUMMERFIELD EAST 03RD ADD 18 31 02/20/1987 Final 34 34 P- 1206D -78 SUMMERFIELD EAST 04TH ADD 28 21 10/24/2002 Final 25 25 Sandy STR Parcel Page 1 1/3/2003 Pagel Engineers Sro . TO: FROM: DATE: PROJECT: FILE #: OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 (509)477 -3600 Fax (509)477 -2243 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" EXTENSION OF TIME Spokane County Division of Plankg� Division of Engineering & Roads January 21, 2002 SUMMERFIELD EAST PE- 1206 -78 Review Date: Planner: Sponsor /Applicant: Section Township Range: Hearing Date: Technical Review Date: 01/11/2002 JOHN PEDERSON KENNETH TUPPER 35 -26 -77 () ( @) The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order /Decision" should the request be approved. Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: 1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. centerline and curb grades bo submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance prior to construction and /or tho filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared undor the direction of a Iiceflsed-P-refoscional Civil Engineer. • •- e e - --- -- - - e e - • - ea. - Engineer. . - - -- - • _:•.:e • - - - - - ' at ed. 0. - -e e-e e CC: Applicant KENNETH TUPPER Engineer /Surveyor Planner JOHN PEDERSON gc plans and a drainago report shall receive tho County Engineer's acceptance prior to relgace of a Page 2 1206 5. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to the 2001 Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management, and all other applicable standards. The plans and report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a construction or building permit or approval of the final plat. 6. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 7. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public right -of -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 8. All construction within the existing or proposed Public right -of -way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements. Construction certification, "As Built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 9. No direct access from lots to stub road connections until such roads are constructed to County standards and established as county roads. 10. Road design, construction, and drainage control for one -half (1/2) rights -of -way and stub road connections are the responsibility of the owner, developer or applicant. 11. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 1592 1 0298, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 12. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to Wellington Avenue, Forker Road and Progress Road. 13. Dedication of 20 feet of additional right -of -way along Progress Road is required. 14. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at Progress Road. Design standards for neighborhood collection arterial should be used. 15. That the sponsor provide 50 foot radius cul -de -sac rights -of -way. 16. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curb along pathway routes as designated by the County Engineer, and shown on the preliminary plat of record, and along Wellesley Avenue. Page 3 1206 17. That the sponsor provide stub road connections, to the west, to access center of Tract 103 and south line of Tract 113 in West Farms Irrigated Tracts. 18. That the sponsor assume responsibility for reconstruction of Progress Road should flooding, caused through activities of the plat, cause damage to the road. 19. That the stub roads to the west be barricaded, by the sponsor, in a fashion acceptable to the Spokane County Engineers. 20. There shall be no further finalization of phases until engineering work is completed to evaluate the impact of storm water runoff from Forker Draw as predicted in newly released FEMA maps and reports. Storm water management plans shall be developed prior to finalization of any further phases. 21. Tho stormwater management systems and roads for this plat shall be constructed and cortifiod to bo constructod in accordanco with tho accepted road and drainago plans, or all tho roquirod imprvovomonts must be bondod for in accordance with shall bo submittod with tho propor codification statoment. 22. A bond for the anticipated engineering inspection and certification portion of the project shall be posted with the County Engineer prior to plan acceptance. 23. If tho projoct is phasod and ono phaso doponds on another phase for access and /or drainage roads will not bo roloasod until tho subjoct phaso is comploted, cortifiod and non accopte• for construction unless tho prior phaso is comploted and certified by the Sponsor's Enginoor. 24. Adoquato drainago oasomonts, granted to S proper maintonanco may bo porformod. Eacomonts for drainago ditches and natural drainago channels shall bo wido onough to contain within tho oasomont tho runoff from a 50 yoar, 241 1 0 25. Condition No. 18 in Spokane County's Finding of Fact and Conclusions for PE- 1206 -78, Sumerfield East are hereby amended as follows: a. Within the development all Tots shall be required to have site plan showing lowest adjacent grade and lowest opening at least 2 feet above curb elevation for residence and concrete garage slab at lease 18 inches above curb elevation. Page 4 1206 b. Each lot will require a floodplain development permit prior to any development (to include grading, filling, excavating, paving, construction and other development activities). Zone- A- Aeedplaia. c. Plat shall contain language identifying the area as a flood hazard area, alerting homeowners of the requirements for developing within the floodplain. d. No further plat encroachment or finalization of phases may occur within the Zone A Floodplain without a CLOMR. c. Development shall only occur within tho Zone Development includes, but is not limited to buildings or othor structures, grading, - '= f. Scaling off tho map is not acceptable, surveyed elevations shall bo used to delineate • .. • Floodplain without applying for, obtaining and completing tho requirements for a Conditional Lotter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 26. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified. 27. "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities." "The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work." 28. Erosion Control: A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) plan shall be prepared by a WA State licensed Professional Engineer and implemented throughout the duration of construction. The TESC plan is to be prepared using best management practices (BMP's) currently accepted within the Civil Engineering profession. The TESC plan is to include, at a minimum, a grading plan, location and details of silt control structures, and street cleaning program. Runoff from exposed areas shall be filtered prior to discharging into a detention pond, swale, infiltration facility, or natural drainageway. The TESC plan is to be included in the road and drainage plans. The applicant's Engineer is to submit the TESC plan and supporting calculations to Spokane County prior to site disturbance. The TESC major structures (such as silt ponds, silt traps) are to be installed prior to other site work and the TESC measures are Page 5 1206 END to be implemented and maintained throughout the duration of construction, including house construction. 29. Any part of the drainage system that lies outside of the public right -of -way will neither be maintained nor operated by Spokane County forces. Prior to plan acceptance by the County Engineer, the Sponsor shall provide a mechanism, acceptable to the County Engineer, for the perpetual maintenance of the stormwater drainage system. This mechanism shall also provide for the funding of routine maintenance and the replacement of the various components of the drainage system at the end of the service life of the respective components, and any other improvements that may be legally required in the future. An Operations and Maintenance Manual for the stormwater management system shall be prepared by the Sponsor's Engineer, and included in the project documents submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance, along with a discussion of the design life of the various components, a calculated annual cost for repair and maintenance, and a calculated replacement cost. Homeowners Associations are accepted by the Spokane County Engineer for carrying out the required maintenance functions and responsibilities. 30. Appropriate provision shall be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A one (1) -foot strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul -de -sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries of the final plat.) 31. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the county road system. 32. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. DATE: March 15, 2001 TO: John Pederson, Spokane County Division of Planning FROM: Tammie Williams RE: Summerfield East 4 and 5 Addition, PE -1206 John, Memorandum This letter is a follow up and supplement to the letter I sent dated 1/12/99 and the revised conditions within the extension of time for PE- 1206- 78 /ZE- 202 -78 dated 1/21/99. These modifications are not substantive in nature and are consistent with the purpose and intent expressed within the extension of time findings, conditions of approval for the Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads item #6. Based on the above, we view the changes as administrative modifications of the conditions of approval. 1 have received information showing this plat to be compliant with certain conditions we put upon the development in regard to floodplain concerns. These are outlined in the attached document, and 1 will address them herein. 6.a. Within the development all lowest floors, including basement floors shall be at or above elevation 2036, as this floodplain has been delineated as an alluvial fan, the structures shall be constructed to withstand any expected debris flow. The first part of this condition is inaccurate. Meeting this condition would be a detriment to the floodplain due to the import of fill in the areas below elevation 2035. Better information submitted to us from the proponent's engineer shows that individual site plans with lowest adjacent grade and lowest opening at least 2 feet above curb elevation for residence and concrete garage slab at least 18 inches above curb elevation meets the requirement to keep the structures safe from flooding (flooding depths were shown to be less than 1 foot in this area). Paget, Pederson — 3/15/01 The second part of this concern (debris flow) was satisfactorily addressed by the proponent's engineer. 6. b. and c. Development within the Zone B only. It has been shown that all lots are outside of the Zone A floodplain, each lot will still require a floodplain development permit because they are within a Zone B. 6. d. No scaling off the flood map. A detailed topographic survey was completed to dipict the floodplain boundaries 6. e. Plat shall contain language identifying the area as a flood hazard area, alerting homeowners of the requirements for developing within the floodplain. This condition still applies. 6. f Roads must not be constructed within the Zone A without further information being supplied to the engineers' office to show safe ingress and egress during a 100 year event, and no impact to the floodplain due to road development. This condition has been met, all roads except a very small portion of one are within the Zone B, safe ingress and egress has been shown without having to pass through the Zone A floodplain. 6. g. No further plat encroachment or finalization of phases may occur within the Zone A F000dplain without a CLOMR. None of the lots are within the Zone A, this condition has been met for this phase. 1 hope this is helpful, if you have questions, please let me know. Summerfield East Plat conditions — 1/18/02, floodplain. #20 should remain as is. (There shall be no further finalization of phases until engineering work is completed to evaluate the impact of storm water runoff form Forker Draw as predicted in newly released FIME maps and reports. Storm water management plans shall be developed prior to finalization of any further phases.) 25. Condition No. 18 in Spokane County's Finding of Fact and Conclusions for PE- 1206 -78, Summerfield East are hereby amended as follows: a. Within the development all lots shall be required to have site plan showing lowest adjacent grade and lowest opening at least 2 feet above curb elevation for residence and concrete garage slab at least 18 inches above curb elevation b. Each lot will require a floodplain development permit prior to any development (to include grading, filling, excavating, paving, construction and other development activities). c. Plat shall contain language identifying the area as a flood hazard area, alerting homeowners of the requirements for developing within the floodplain. d. No further plat encroachment or finalization of phases may occur within the Zone A Floodplain without a CLOMR. DIVISION OF PLANNING MICHAEL V. NEEDHAM, DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads, Transportation Engineering, Scott Engelhard c/o Sandy Kimball Spokane County Division of Utilities; Information Management, Jim Red Spokane County Stormwater Utility, Stormwater Utility, Brenda Sims Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Spokane County Parks & Recreation, Steve Horobiowski Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 Trentwood Irrigation District East Valley School District No. 361 FROM: John Pederson, Senior Planner DATE: December 28, 2001 SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PE- 1206 -78; SUMMERFIELD EAST The Spokane County Division of Planning has received the attached request for an Extension of' Time for the above - subject preliminary plat. Please provide any comments or recommended conditions by January 11, 2002. If you have any questions, you may contact me at 477 -7212. WC Enclosure: Application for Extension of Time c: Ken Tupper, 122 N. Raymond, Spokane, WA 99206 CLC Associates, 707 W. 7th Ave., Ste. 200, Spokane, WA 99204 1026 W. BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0220 PHONE: (509) 477 -7200 • FAX: (509) 477 -2243 • TDD: (509) 477 -7133 NAME OF PLAT/FILE NO: PE 1206 -78 4635 9050; f 90 4 �2; 4844 PARCEL NO, , clog- APPLICANT (NAME OF LEGAL OWNER): FIVE FIFTY, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 122 North Raymond CITY: Spokane STATE: WA PHONE: (work) 217 -1052 (home) IF APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR THE BELOW OWNER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE OWNER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT: KENNETH J. TUPPER MAILING ADDRESS: 122 North Raymond CITY: Spokane PHONE: (work) 217 -1052 (home) STATE: WA I. Has any portion of the plat, short plat or BSP been fmalized (recorded)? Yes. 2. Has a proposed final plat, short plat or BSP been submitted to the Division of Planning? Yes x No If no, why has the plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized? What has been the delay? Please see attached 3. What progress has occurred: What conditions of approval have been completed (such as survey work, improvements constructed, departmental approvals obtained)? Please see attached Page 1 of 2 Application for Extension of Time ay. ./110a_. ZIP: 99206 (fax) 924 -1211 ZIP: 99706 (fax) 924 -1211 4. Why has the plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized? What has delayed finalization? Please see artarhed 5. Is this a phased project? Yes X No If yes, please complete the following information: No. of lots originally approved: 266 No. of phases finalized to date: 4 No. of lots remaining to be finalized: 133 No. of acres remaining to date: 45 LEGAL OWNER SIGNATURE (Signature of legal owner or representative as authorized by legal owner) 1, KENNETH J. TUPPER , (print name) SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. ADDRESS: 122 North Raymond PHONE: 217 -1052 CITY: Spokane STATE: WA ZIP: 99206 EXT OF TIME APP/WTC/Rev. 101001 IGNAY'UB$ DATE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me thiso day o , 200/ NO; `W EB74 ▪ w sowe S S% P OLIO �0 � � AS* My appointment expires: } - / �+—V / 0 Z 0 a NOTARY SIGNATURE Notary Public in and fir the State of Washington r elitrjz Residing at: NOTARY Page 2 of 2 Application for Extension of Time DATE SUBMITTED: / c90 /D RECEIVED BY: W VaV `"-- AMOUNT RECEIVED: 4) T I • D tJ RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME SUMMERFIELD EAST; PE 1206 -78 ATTACHMENT Four phases of the Summerfield East plat have been fmalized into 135 lots. Finalization of the remaining 133 lots on 45 acres have been delayed due to difficulties in obtaining approval of the storm water management systems to handle off site drainage on to the site from Forker draw. In the past six years, the developer has engaged in engineering and geological investigations of the Forker draw watershed culminating in a ( 'Geology Report of the Forker Draw Watershed" which was submitted to Spokane County and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). In addition, several engineering and design reports for construction of a storm water system capable of handling 100 year floor events have been produced and submitted for review by Spokane County. Also, working in conjunction with Spokane County, Developer has sought changes in FEMA's designation of Forker draw as a "alluvial fan" and also sought changes in the 100 year flood plain boundary. The resolution of storm water issues for this plat is complicated and difficult involving not only the concurrence of Spokane County but coordination with FEMA. As noted above, the Developer had diligently pursued all various design options and has produced original research and report on the Forker draw watershed. In the past 3 years the developer has completed mapping and an evaluation report regarding the flood zone as it affects their plat and obtained the concurrence of Spokane County as to its location. We are informed that Spokane County is in the process of completing a Stormwater study of the Forker Draw. Spokane County's study together with information provides by the Developer should resolve stormwater and flood plain issues for the Summerfield property. In 1999, the Developer engaged Inland Pacific Engineering ( "IPEC ") to prepare a final plat for 64 lots on 21 acres. Drawings and studies for the final plat were prepared for review by Spokane County Utilities and Engineering Department. These drawings are studies which include a Topographic Survey, Septic Tank/Drainfield Investigation, Road and Drainage Plans, Water and Sewer System Plans, and Final Plat layout. The Developer has submitted all documents and drawings necessary for final plat approval for 25 lots and awaits final plat approval by Spokane County. The Developer requests a three (3) year extension of time. GAT\Tupper Ken B56061SummeKeldtAmchment to Extension of Time RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNTY 2001 DIVISION OF PLANNING FileNurnber; .; PjNarriel! -_ Land Lots Final'LotsAuditor RectkudiAudi P- 1206 -78 SUMMERFIELD EAST ADD Final 268 28 04/09/198417 9 P- 1206A -7 SUMMERFIELD EAST 1STA Final 53 53 08/29/198417 32 P- 12068 -7 SUMMERFIELD EAST 2ND A Final 19 19 04/25/198617 100 P- 1206C -7 SUMMERFIELD EAST 3RD A Final 34 34 02/20/198718 31 P- 1206D -7 SUMMERFIELD EAST 4TH A Activ Sandy STR Parcel Page 1 01/02/2002 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON December 19, 1995 TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Current Planning Administrator) �J�� FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER\J��A SUBJ: EXTENSION OF TIME, PE 1206-78/Summerfield East re: Subdivisions The County Engineer has reviewed the extension of time and has no additional comments to add other than those conditions of record as as amended. When detailed drainage and road plans are submitted they shall comply with the Guidelines for Stormwater Management and Spokane County Road Standards as amended. TO: DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR Thank you. Enclosure MEMORANDUM Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads Spokane County Division of Utilities Spokane County Health District Spokane County Division of Buildings Spokane County Parks Department Fire Protection District No. 1 Trentwood Irrigation District East Valley School District FROM: John Pederson, Senior Planner 1 \ c: Ken Tupper, 12929 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane, WA 99216 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 BUILDING PHONE: (509) 456 -3675 • FAX: (509) 4564703 PLANNING PHONE: (509) 456 -2205 • FAX: (509) 456 -2243 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR DATE: December 1, 1995 SUBJECT: Extension of Time for PE- 1206 -78 SUMMERFIELD EAST The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached request for an Extension of Time to finalize the plat of PE- 1206 -78 SUMMERFIELD EAST. If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should be made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to John Pederson by December 15, 1995. PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Briefly summarize the progress made, to date, in preparing the plat to be finalized (i.e., physica construction, bonding for improvements, surveying and drafting work, accomplishing various departmental requirements, obtaining or granting easements, etc.) See attached ; : ,- Jyti ^ / / I '`'`' ";'l � \ /'' `r\ l /�Y // \,mo t ' A TE APPLICANT/SUS aYO FROtI :SPO COUNTY PLANNING TO :9P4582728 OCT 27. 1995 12 :12A ?.22 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY PLAT EXTENSION OF TIME FORM Plat Number: PE 1206 -78 #ofLots: 266 Sponsor: Ken Tupper Windermere /Tupper Realty Address: E. 12929 Sprague Ave. City,Stnte,74: Spokane, WA 99216 Phone: 928 -1991 Engineer /Surveyor: Inland Pacific Engineering Address: 707 W. 7th, Suite 200 City, State, Zip: Spokane, WA 99204 Phone: 458 -6840 Plat Name: Summerfield East # of Acres: 86 Owner: Ken Tupper Windermere /Tupper Realty Address: E. 12929 Sprague Ave. City, State, Zip; _Spokane, WA 99216 Phone: 928 -1991 PHASED PROJECT (TO BE COMPLETED ONI,Y IF THE PLAT IS BEING DEVJLOPED AND FINALIZED IN PHASES) # of lots originally approved: 266 # of phases finalized to date: 3 # of lots remaining to be finalized: 133 # of acres remaining: 45 acres PLEASE RETURN TIIIS FORM ALONG WITH EXTENSION OF TIME FEE. (' mo" � �c ATTACHMENT TO EXTENSION OF TIME FORM Four phases of the Summerfield East plat have been finalized into 135 lots. Finalization of the remaining 133 lots on 45 acres have been delayed due to difficulties in obtaining approval of the storm water management system to handle off site drainage on to the site from Forker draw. In the past three years, the developer has engaged in engineering and geological investigations of the Forker draw watershed culminating in a "Geology Report of the Forker Draw Watershed" which was submitted to Spokane County and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). In addition, several engineering and design reports for construction of a storm water system capable of handling 100 year floor events have been produced and submitted for review by Spokane County. Also, working in conjunction with Spokane County, developer has sought changes in FEMA's designation of Forker draw as a "alluvial fan" and also sought changes in the 100 year flood plain boundary. FEMA's determination in this regard was made this summer and only now, can engineering designs for the storm water system for this plat be finalized. The resolution of storm water issues for this plat is complicated and difficult involving not only the concurrence of Spokane County but coordination with FEMA. As noted above, the developer had diligently pursued all various design options and has produced original research and report on the Forker draw watershed. Having completed this work, the Summerfield plat should be extended for an additional three year period of time. 4 OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER ? ' . o ( Inter-office Communication To t l From ": 1 / C Subject S 3 i 7 /l L SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date " / 19 2 r e--F7 7? s o ,/ ` t a w Cg r A/ ©YL i o o ! 1 M o C/7/ t v DATE: JUNE 21, 1993 PROJECT: SUMMERFIELD EAST ADDITIONS STORM WATER DISPOSAL REPORT OF: SINGLE -RING INFILTROMETER TESTING CONDUCTED BY HOWARD CONSULTANT REPRESENTATIVE ON JUNE 7, 1993 REPORTED BY: J. RADKE A series of four falling head permeability tests were conducted by Derrick Pohl of Howard Consultants on Monday, June 7, 1993. Two separate sites were chosen by Pohl in an area located generally to the north, northeast of the existing platted land represented by Summerfield East and Summerfield East 1st - 3rd Additions. Two separate, falling head permeability tests were performed in reletively close proximity to each other at the separate sites. One test consisted of determining the permeability of the soil underlying the site after surficial vegetation and soil had been stripped to an approximate depth of minus 4 - 6 inches below grade. The other test was performed using the same single ring infiltrometer technique as the first, however this test was conducted at existing grade and surficial vegetation was left undisturbed. Actual test procedures employed were generally consistant with those outlined in the attached "Procedure for Field Permeability Testing." Test site locations, raw test data, and calculated permeability rates are as follows: TEST SITE #1 Test site # 1 can roughly be arrived at by proceeding along Progress Road in a generally easterly direction from the intersection of Progress Road and Forker Road approximately 650. Then proceeding in a generally southerly direction at right angles to the tangent of the curve of Progress Road at this point a distance of approximately 550 feet, one arrives at test site # 1. DATA; TEST SITE #1, TEST #1 (vegetation stripped, 4 - 6 inches below grade): Time of Day Head 9:45 AM inches 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM Applying equation (7.6 EE -4 cm /s). Time of Day 9:45 AM inches 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM Applying equation (8.2 EE -4 cm /s). Elapsed Time 0 minutes 15 minutes 30 minutes 45 minutes 60 minutes in attached test method, K = 1.08 inches /hour DATA; TEST SITE #1, TEST #2 (vegetation intact, conducted at existing grade): Elapsed Time 0 minutes 15 minutes 30 minutes 45 minutes 60 minutes TEST SITE #2 Drop in H2O 1 +3/4 inches 3 +9/16 inches 5 +3/16 inches 6 +5/16 inches Drop in H2O H y d 20 18.25 inches 16.44 inches 14.81 inches 13.69 inches Hyd. Head 20 2+ 3/16 inches 17.81 inches 4+ 0/16 inches 16.00 inches 5+ 7/16 inches 14.56 inches 6 +11/16 inches 13.31 inches in attached test method, K = 1.16 inches /hour Test site # 2 can roughly be arrived at by proceeding along Progress Road in a generally easterly direction from the intersection of Progress Road and Forker Road approximately 415 feet. Then proceeding in a generally southerly direction at right angles to the tangent of the curve of Progress Road at this point a distance of approximately 190 feet, one arrives at test site # 1. DATA; TEST SITE #2, TEST #1 (vegetation stripped, 4 - 6 inches below grade): Time of Day Elapsed Time Head 10:10 AM inches 10:25 AM 10:40 AM 10:55 AM 11:10 AM Applying equation in (9.0 EE -4 cm /s). 0 minutes 15 minutes 30 minutes 45 minutes 60 minutes Drop in H2O H y d 20 2+ 3/16 inches 17.81 inches 4+ 1/16 inches 15.94 inches 5 +12/16 inches 14.25 inches 7+ 3/16 inches 12.81 inches attached test method, K = 1.27 inches /hour DATA; TEST SITE #2, TEST #2 (vegetation intact, conducted at existing grade): Time of Day 12:10 AM inches 12:25 AM 12:40 AM 12:55 AM 1:10 AM 15 minutes 30 minutes 45 minutes 60 minutes Elapsed Time Drop in H2O 0 minutes Hyd. Head 20 3 +15/16 inches 16.06 inches 7 +5/16 inches 12.69 inches 10 +1/16 inches 9.94 inches 12 +9/16 inches 7.44 inches Applying equation in attached test method, K = 2.82 inches /hour (2.0 EE -3 cm /s). Please note that at test site #2, test #2 it is believed a larger degree of sample disturbance occurred during the placement of the infiltrometer than during the other tests (infiltromer at test #2, test site #2 pounded into place; other infiltrometers pushed into placing using hydraulic equipment). 0. Date: June 2, 1993 To: Jim Radke From: Dave Motley Subject: P 1206 May 7, 1993 Arrived on site at 9:45am, Eller Corporation had already dug test hole # 1, 2, & 3. Water was evident at 15' in hole # 1 and 17' in hole # 2. The following is a list of visible classifications for each test hole using hole reference numberrprovided by Dick Mason. Locations of each test hole will be provided by Dick Mason. The elevations given are referenced to top of hole, any other references must be supplied by Dick Mason. At hole # 1 where water level was at 15' from original ground, contractor continued to dig and dry gravel appeared to be coming from approximately the 20' level. The following holes and log were witness by me: Hole # 4 Black top soil to 1 1/2' depth; brown moist silt, trace of clay to 10' depth then brown moist fine silt sand with trace of gravel to 17' depth. End of excavation. Hole # 5 black top soil to 1 1/2 ' depth; brown moist silt with trace of sand to 12' depth; grey moist coarse sand to 16' depth; brown moist sandy gravel to 19 1/2' depth. End of excavation. Hole # 6 black top soil t 2' depth; brown moist silt with trace of sand to 8' depth; then brown moist gravel with sand to 15'. End of excavation. Hole # 7 black moist top soil to 2' depth; brown moist silt, trace of sand to 10' depth; moist to dry orange gravel with silt to 18' depth. Excavation ended. Hole # 8 black moist top soil to 1' depth; brown moist silt with NU trace of sand to 8' depth. End of excavation. Hole # 9 black moist top soil to depth of 1 1/2'; brown moist silt to 9' depth; grey moist medium grain sand with gravel to 14' depth. End of excavation. Hole # 10 black moist top soil to 4' depth; brown moist to wet silt with trace of clay to 19' depth; brown wet sandy gravel to a depth of 22'. End of excavation. SPOKANE COUNTY COURTHOUSE TO: FROM: Thomas Veljic, Planner I DATE: September 8, 1992 SUBJECT: Extension of Time for Summerfield East, PE- 1206 -78 Thank you. kc Enclosure MEMORANDUM Spokane County County Engineer Spokane County Utilities Spokane County Health District Spokane County Department of Building & Safety Fire Protection District No. 1 Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3 (I) PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFER PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached request for an Extension of Time to finalize the plat of Summerfield East, File No. PE- 1206 -78. If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should be made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments by September 22, 1992. c: Ken Tupper, Windermere/Tupper Realty, E. 12929 Sprague Avenue, Spokane, WA. 99216 Inland Pacific Engineering, S. 25 Altamont, Spokane, WA. 99202 1131Virliir FF SEP 0 91992 SPBK,l11E COUNTY ENGINEER PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Briefly summarize the progress made, to date, in preparing the plat to be finalized (i.e., physical construction, bonding for improvements, surveying and drafting work, accomplishing various departmental requirements, obtaining or granting easements, etc.) To date, approximately 133 lots in three phases have been developed with streets, utilities and homes. Engineering work is currently underway to evaluate the impact of storm water runoff from Forker Draw as predicted in newly released FEMA maps and reports. It is expected that storm water management plans will be developed which will allow the development of . Phase IV in 1993. August 28, 1992 .1 S- X •t ^ C\ DATE A. N1'/SURVEYOR 10. RECEIVE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT AUG 2 8 1992 Srvn.avc., PRELIMINARY PLAT PUNNING DEPARTMENT EXTENSION OF TIME FORM P1atNumber: PE- JZD( '75 Plat Name: Summerfield East # of Lots: 266 # of Acres: 86 Sponsor: Ken Tupper Owner: Ken Tupper Address: Windermere /Tupper Realty Address: Windermere /Tupper Realty r.. 12929 Sprague E. 12929 Sprague City State Zio Spokane, W `.:,y S , Zi Spokane, WA Phone: 928 -1991 Phone: 928 -1991 Engineer /Surveyor: Address: City, State, Zip: Inland Pacific Engineering South 25 Altamont Spokane, WA 99202 • Phone: (509) 535 -1410 FAX (509) 535 -1942 PHASED PROJECT (TO BE COMPLETED ONLY IF THE PLAT IS BEING DEVELOPED AND FINALIZED IN PHASES) # of Lots originally approved: 266 # of phases finalized to date: 3 # of lots remaining to be finalized: 133 # of acres remaining: 45 acres PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM ALONG WITH $12O EXTENSION OF TIME FEE. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON September 29, 1992 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Current Planning Administrator FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 96r-`' SUBJ: EXTENSION OF TIME, PE 1206 -92 / Summerfield East re: Subdivisions We have reviewed the above referenced Extension of Time request. The following comments are applicable to the request. The following Conditions of Approval are to be added at this time in order to bring the proposal into compliance with adopted County standards and policy. • There shall be no further finalization of phases until engineering work is completed to evaluate the impact of storm water runoff from Forker Draw as predicted in newly released FEMA maps and reports. Storm water management plans shall be developed prior to finalization of any further phases. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: TEY /set SPOKANE COUNTY COURTHOUSE OFYIOS OF COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER Srosaarg ,R'a SIKINM royr 99260 February 8, 1985 RE: Sununerfield East Addition No. 1206 Calvin Road in Summerfield East Addition No. 1206 has been inspected and approved and is in the process of being established to maintain. If you have any questions, please contact this office at 456 -3600. Yours very truly, Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer ec:p lett-wa tc C. :=_ Ic.Aa et. Thomas E. Yake, P.E. Construction Engineer Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3600 DATE 11/12/84 FEDERAL /STATE PROJECT NO. , PROJECT TITLE Summerfield East 2nd Addition PROJECT LIMITS North side . of Wellesley Avenue from progress road west byu reel, to Summerfield East L _ Etc LAddttitaQ EXISTING CONDITIONS: ROAD, WIDTH '22' (11' N of CL) Curb on southside ROAD SURFACE asph& t - AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC 4.. REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION ROAD NAME Wellesley Avenue CRP /RID /PLAT /Z.C. No..PE #1206 -78 Current 'Vine in Paved area. Submitted By 5 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT: 22' paving on north" side of CL: • w/ 6.5'..sidewalk7curb . Design Year PROJECT DESCRIPTION 53 Lot residential subdivision (a phase, in the Summerfield East project) DESCRIPTION OF STANDARD INVOLVED Requirement for '208' sodded drainage "swales for storm water and drywellsTocae behind curbs in swate . • . • " PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION Delete drainage swales and.locate drywalls ,;alon -g curb•- JUSTIFICATION Wellesley Avenue has already been partially improved this area'.`:'. (�n South side of the streefr WITTFTTMA and sidewaiks without drainage - swales . • and drainage structures located within the ,traveled way. (,There is an unpaved area between the age oT I e paving Ti 8 tne curb.) the approved aesiyns Tor the north side of Wellesley Avenue for Summerfield Last and summerrieia East 1st Addition also delete drainage swaies (no drainage structures are located in paved areas) This proposed deviation would ailow this final improvement to the north. side of WETesley Avenue in the buKUneTfield_ E pru,leLL Lu le_ _ compatible with existing_imp_rovements. Furthermore, Lots in the proposea plat ld East 2nd Addition wi.11 — a> etrontage on- ifiteribr streets in ttI Plat be denied individual lot access to Wellesley Avenue, so that tne drainage swales will be in the back . yards of the proposeo Tots. Because of this - location in the bacKyards:lt may be more unlikely that the swales will be adequately maintained. • Data c� STAFF HECt)MMENDATIONS .4 ./Tvc( /Y < ; ` w it _ . _/_ L_ • Approved Not Approved Approved. U Approved. Not Approved O Approved Not Approved,. Not Approved Approved Not Approved [1 Sec ion 'Engineer Date Traffic Engineer Date, Office Engineer . Date.. Division ,Engineer. Date County Engineer • Date et DATE 11/12/84 ___?r9PSSes1. lltt _ line in paved area. REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEV1AT1, FEDERAL /STATE PROJECT NO. " PROJECT TITLE Summerfield East 2nd Addition 'PROJECT LIMITS West Side of Progr•ess ; - fr6m WeTTesr6y 7Wenue"nUFZh 1,3b0 te to north, boundary of • Apppprox 24' paving w (12.5 west of EXISTING CONI)ITION ana curb /51 e a on east PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT:, ROAD WIDTH side 29' E of centerline. 28 feet of paving west of CL w/ ROAD SURFACE asphalt 6,5 feet of curb /sidewalk AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC Current storm water and drywells located in cFainage swaTe. Submitted By ROAD NAME • Progress Road - 146S CRP /RID /PLAT /Z.C. Nu. PE- 1216_78 Design Year PROJECT DESCRIPTION 53 lot residential subdivision (a phase in the Summerfield East project) DESCRIPTION OF STANDARD INVOLVED Requirement for '208' sodded drainage swale for PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION Delete drainage swales and locate drywells along•-eurb JUSTIFICATION The east side of Progress has been partially improved -for 1080 -feet" north from WellesTey with cuFb and sfl WaTk and Cnordrainage swales an area between curb and asphalt remains unpaved) with two drainage structures located in traveled way at the northeast corner of Progress and WelTesley. the proposed deviation would allow our improvements to be compatible with those on the east side of the street. Furthermore, because any drainage swale alone Progress would bean -back yards ot- lots within the plat (the lots will be served by interior roads and denied individual lot access to Progress), they are Tess l kely to be maintained adequately than swales in front yards. Date • STAFF RE Ct)MMENUATIUNI '�f te:5.5 A 0 '+ i -/- I / ) __\'` / /r:f0 in _5!,14 r`; - ' - b L.._ ( - n l - :r Approved Not Approved Approved. Not Approved Approved Approved LJ . • Li ci Not Approved Not Approved Approved Not Approved ❑ Ll £t& ineer Dare Traffic Engineer Date' Office Engineer Division Engineer Date. County Engineer Date Date • INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. South 25 Altamont Street Phone: (509) 535 -I410 Spokane, Washington 99202 TO: Sp oko#7e Cogisp f7 w enc. ,r / Jeff 5pokinz M/gsh DATE: OeLein h.err 63 /WI ,fl -r' PROJECT: SUMMER FIELD EAST Al ON: GA /C /VEL Files Review For your: Informed on Approval RECEIVED DEC 5 1984 County Engineering Gentlemen: We are sending (✓r herewith ( ) under separate cover copies of the following: NUMBER OF COPIES AND DESCRIPTION: Contract Documents Preliminary Plat Seerer Plan Site Plans Final Plat Detail Drawings Boundary Survey lA Plan Specifications Legal Description Road Plan & Profiles Reports Remarks : 45 per de ✓ial7r' -, repttshun-) ?proved bvL l�ocvr vTn cz we have- revised bavriw ov west end of Wabash (5h. Z of L[) fo be a six -{cof high Chair? link_ fene wifh two "end of roadway m7arke iiv/ reff/ec#or5_ Sincerely, CJ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Environmental Analysis Signature Distri hut ion ` .lTtk' 4,4s. STA. ' 112 Z ELEV. 113 E. P. ELEV. 1t4 DIST. FROM k, to E.P. 115 DIST. FROM E.P. TO CURB /°j!u' 2 I!6 MINLMIIM CURB ELEV. (4.5% SLOPE FROM E.P. + CURB HEIGHT) #7 MAXIMUM CURB ELEV. (2% SLnrE FROM E.P. + CURB HEIGHT) 1i8 SELECTED ELEV. '49 X GRADE /o f //o,. 29 12 28 /5:5 �2P,' 70 2887 2,;7 � 000(o 1 10 �o p�,39 /ot6 /. 5 29°2 2 ' /5,5 S 28,7 2- 28.85 ' ZB.;€ Q /l+ 4.6 9 99 28 /5,q � 29•/5 29, 28' ; 9,,17 /Iizt.o► ,. 24.26 / /fb /a 292 z 9 � /5 5- 29 Z /2,44.0 - .p ° 3 4 28.98 12 0,0 ° 29 Za = /S,S 5- 2s.97 29.09 ze,peo . 0�, 6 I Zt61A, X93 2Z !S' S ) 22 Jo; 22,75 28, 73 — i`1 ZE.6/ 13fII• ,2$ 28 29 / I5 J 2�.y6 z£l;S� 2 y 9 f.. ✓'FIELD INFORMATION 5gut 0 (), Ore- - ,yote . fC ft . 39 hid* I i 2 " OFFICE CAI tUTATIONS AND DF.SICN >! 5ammerMd mast 2 s± /1dd We / %s/ Buen e_ cwc 6 / 7 /g`f k „ By: NO, 86 0339 IN THE MATTER OF FILING THE FINAL PLAT ) OF SBMMERFIELD EAST 2ND ADDITION AND ZONE ) CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE ) R E S O L U T I O N FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IN SECTION 35, ) TOWNSHIP 26N, RANGE 44 E.W.M., SPOKANE ) COUNTY, WASHINGTON ) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, that the Final Plat of BEFORE.THE•BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 6;E- 1206 -780 ZE- 202 -78 SUMMERFIELD EAST 2ND ADDITION a parcel of land in the SE 1/4 of Section 35, Township 26N, Range 44 E.W.M., in Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the SE corner of Lot 1, Block 7 of Summerfield East First Addition, per plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 32, in the Auditor's Office of said County; thence northerly along the easterly boundary of said Addition the following five (5) courses: (1) N 00 °03'20 "E a distance of 140 ft; (2) N 05 °33'06 "E, a distance of 50.23 ft; (3) N 00 °03'20 "E, a distance of 130.00 ft; (4) S 89 °56'40 "E, a distance of 342.67 ft; (5) N 00 °25'19 "E, a distance of 195.51 feet; thence S 89 °34'41 "E, a distance of 125.00 ft; thence S 61 °16'19 "E, a distance of 56.79 ft; thence S 89 °34'41 "E, a distance of 140.00 ft. to the westerly margin of Progress Road, as it now exists 60.00 ft. in width; thence S 00 °25'19 "W along said westerly margin a distance of 486.57 ft. to the northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue, as it now exists 60.00 ft. in width; thence N 89 °56'40 "W along said northerly margin a distance of 660.55 ft. to the point of beginning more precisely described in the plat dedication, on the recommendation of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee, be, and the same hereby is approved, with the exception that the public rights of way dedicated in this plat will not be established for maintenance purposes until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a separate resolution of the Board of County Commissioners. PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS o DAY OF L e12Z/ , 1985. ATTEST: WILLI Cl E. DONAHUE f the Board BOARD OF COUNTY COMM OF SPOK' COUNT iii! /,J__ dire-.-eJ 1,'N ONERS N March 1, 1989 U.S. Flood Research P.Q. Box 6565 Lynnwood Wa. 98036 attn: Terry Tyson RE: Summerfield East Third Addition Dear Mr. Tyson We have inspected the berm shown on the attached plan and find that it is constructed. Very Truly Yours Tom Yak:e P.E. Construction Engineer t SPDXANC COUNTY COURT HOUSE Mr. William W. Mai.h, E. 12720 Nora Avenue, Spokane, Wa. 99216 Dear Mr. Main: ! P LAT FI Le, 11' I(eD ; Ji ttii: c\ Wij r ' 4 8`f ➢ll iar l' r CP 1 OI COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER Sruaiaxr: , «asiaixcirux 99260 April 17, 1980 S u....,..akewcoGaT Subject: Drainage Plans Our staff has reviewed your request to reconsider their reported position regarding the requirement of constructing the drainage pond in conjunction with the first phase of your plat development. My analysis of that review indicates that there was not a clear understanding between our staff and your Engineer's staff as to the drainage pond requirement. I will not spend any time trying to unwind what has happened to date from either of the Staff's standpoint, but will state to you our Department's position • concerning the drainage pond and your first phase plat. For a number of years it has been very apparent that portions of the property under preliminary plat consideration has experienced a drainage and flooding problem from the Forker Road gulch runoff. With that basic knowledge, reference to a drainage pond as a proposed solution did result and has since been included in the discussions concerning this plat. As you know with each final plat we do require that the developer's engineer prepare and submit a drainage plan for review and approval by the County. The drainage plan is developed from an engineering analysis of the drainage situation in an area and contains construction plans for improvements needed to resolve any drainage problems as noted in the analysis. Such is the case with your phase one final plat proposal. If after analysing the areas drainage problem along Forker Road your Engineer concludes that there will be little, if indeed any, effect on the health, safety, general welfare on the new lots to be created by your phase one proposal then the drainage plan should reflect that engineering analysis and resulting position. If, on the other hand, it is concluded that there will be a drainage problem associated with the phase one development, then of course, an engineering solution to that problem is required and should be contained in your Engineer's drainage plans. We rely heavily on the Mr. William W. Main, E. 12720 Nora Avenue, Spokane, Wa. 99216 Subject: Drainage Plans Developer's engineer and his engineering expertise, experience, and judgment in the preparation of an adequate and workable drainage plan. At this point in time, our staff indicates that they have received nothing from your Engineer in support of either position and, therefore, cannot proceed with the phase one plat until the Forker Road drainage situation has been considered and resolved in an acceptable manner. I hope my analysis has not provided additional confusion or misunder- standing on behalf of this Department. If you have any questions, please advise. GWK:a Page 2. April 17, 1980 Yours very truly, Robert S. Turner PE County Engineer. By 8 , Gary W. Kennaly, PE Planning & Traffic Engineer. March 25, 1980 Spokane, Washington Executive Office SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS Attention: Mr. Robert S. Turner North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 RE: SUMMERFIELD EAST ADDITION Dear Mr. Turner: much. WWM: ktb Enclosed RECEIVED W?OISAMt! cowfl! 21ti Ex+ MAR 31 1980 Please find enclosed a sketch of the Preliminary Plat of Sumnerfield East. Outlined in red is the first phase of the preliminary plat which is being reviewed for final recording. Mr. Gary Nelson of your department has required that the design and construction of a "drainage pond" be part of the conditions of approval for the first phase. The "drainage pond" idea, came about as one of two alternatives men- tioned in the EIS to alleviate storm water runoff from the Fbrker Road draw. To our knowledge the plat conditions do not state that the "drain- age pond" be construced by the sponsor. To this date there was reason to believe through initial discussions with your department that construction of the "drainage pond" could be delayed past the first phase. First phase of the preliminary plat appears far enough removed from the problem area to be of no direct concern. Therefore, we request that the design and construction of the "drainage pond" be deleted as part of the first phase conditions. To protect future phasing we agree to meet the "drainage pond" conditions at such time you deem necessary. Your Immediate response would be most appreciated. Thank you very Sincerely, WILLIAM W. MAIN ,/ 1 East 12720 Nora Avenue • Spokane, Washington 99216 • 928 -7346 c kG P ( eP B o, �° aye x p•� .r •..p.J..o Jape- o..f.++2 t • �J ;e• o? y ak% i E r i_ __ 1 - 1. :. it I \i \ i / ,.. - 1 _ • • i .• Y 1 u 1 L - --" FL 5 - 4 Phase •4 P1a • 7'r • v e 00' b\ ?Pc' � 1t nkfrlcoo o -4Q Nx . •1s- il .. 1 1. - • • •••q •••r Lnland Pacific Engineering East 12720..Nora Avenue . .Spokane, WA ;99216. ATTENTION: Jerry-A.- Sintlair Dear Sirs: - Your July_ 18; 1980-letter regarding Summerfield East outlined the potential- . drainage problems. in the area and - requested the following: 1) that=•the con - struction of the drainageipond•be''removed as .a requirement for the'. first phase of Summerfield East, 2) aµberm be, around Phase I, and 3) that the' plan `profile sheets 'be .approved: We concur With your recommendation to :delete the pond for Phase -One, with the understanding that.it will be constructed -with Phase Two We also.- concur'with ..the. suggestiorrthat a berm be constructed.. We request:that the berm. be in eluded 'on the plans and;;submitted for our:review.: GWK /set , 'Gary. W. Kennaly, P.E:' Planning and Traffic Division_- Engineer Yours very, truly •Robert'S. Turner, -P.E. Spokane County-Engineer PEC NLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION July 18, 1980 Gary Kennaly Spokane County Engineers Office N811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99210 Re: Summerfield East Dear Mr. Kennaly: In regards to storm water runoff from the Forker Road draw, we have further investigated past drainage problems with the residents of the area. These investigations were necessary to determine whether the construction of the drainage pond is needed in conjunction with the first phase of the pre- liminary plat. In our investigations we have spoken with the following persons: Sanford H. Riggs, Business Manager East Valley School District #361 22 years working with the district Tony Danelo N5110 Bannen Road 16 years farming the area EAST 12720 NORA AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99216 • (509) 922 -1300 RECEIVED JUL2 11980 Don Kruger, Building Contractor N4320 Progress 60 years in the area The enclosed map will aid in locating the residences and site areas we will be referring to. The Trentwood Elementary School which is bordered on three sides by Phase I of Summerfield East has had no flooding problems in the last 22 years according to Mr. Riggs and others. Mr. Kruger and Mr . have both seen flooding through the wide Swale area just to the north and west of Phase I. Mr. Danelo has seen the flooding during periods when the ground was frozen and spring melts are beginning. Mr. Kruger also has seen where runoff flooding has occurred in the area of Progress and Wellesley. He said that this runoff was generated mainly by the land to the east. According to Mr. Kruger, this flooding has occurred several times and Page 2-- Summerfield East the worst he recalls being a wet summer in the late 1930's. During this occurrence it was possible that flooding occurred in the fringes of Phase I, but he was quite sure that what is now the present school site, there was no flooding. In tlr. Kruger's opinion he felt that with the development of roads and the schools to the east of the plat, it has helped in slowing down the runoff and dissipating it before it reaches Progress and Wellesley. These investigative interviews lead us to conclude that flooding does occur on a good portion of the preliminary plat, but very little, if any, has oc- curred in the first phase. Based on our previous calculations and the construction of a low berm around Phase I, we request that the construction of the drainage pond be removed as a requirement for the first phase of Summerfield East. We request also for approval of the plan and profile sheets along with the storm drainage facilities design. Thank you very much. Very truly yours, INLAND PACIFIC EN AND CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION a Jerry A. Sinclair Encl. JAS /yb 1 Sub -Area 1 Sub -Area 2 Area = 2.25 acres Area = 0.95 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.008 L = 200 feet n = 0.4 C = 0.15 • SUMMERFTELD EAST ADDITION STORM DRAINAGE REPORT The proposed subdivision would plat approximately 25.74 acres of valley farmland into 81 Lots at an approximate density of 3.15 dwellings per acre. Roads will be paved and curbed at a width of 40 feet on through streets and 32 feet on streets with a cul -de -sac. Drainage swaies adjacent to the curbs will channel storm water runoff to drywells located in the drainage swale. The predominant soil type on the site is Garrison Gravelly Loam, SCS Classification "B ". Features of the soil include rapid permeability and low water holding capacity which indicates a high suitability to drywells for disposal of storm water runoff. Due to the characteristics of the soil it is felt that the guide- line of 1 cfs per double barrel drywell is conservative in this instance. The effects of urbanization on storm water runoff is determined using the Rational Method. To facilitate the calculations the plat was divided into twelve sub -areas (See Figure 1). I = 0.3 4 T = C [Ln/ mj 0.6 S = 0.00 L = 500 feet T = 26.87 min. n = 0.4 oA.0 /4 R = 1.6 50 -year storm C = 0.15 / Q = AIR = 2.25(0.4)(1 ..6) = 1.08 cfs 50 -year storm Q = 0.68 cfs 10 -year storm 50 � 9 T = 8.85 min. RI■ 2.4 10 -year storm Summerfield East Addition Storm Drainage Report Page Two Sub -Area 3 Sub -Area 4 Sub -Area 5 Area = 1.95 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.003 L = 400 feet n = 0.4 C = 0 Q = 1.25 cfs 50 -year storm Area = 2.45 acres I = 0.3 T = 20.46 min. S = 0.006 R = 1.95 50 -year storm L = 700 feet n = 0.4 �� °w C = 0.15 CkeG1t r'd"4 Ode S"t ,/ 4toPA a dwL 0 = 1.43 cfs 50 -year storm k S3/4" mu 1.y K /.65r t .5. NOTE: Sub -Area y 5 includes land not within the plat boundary i.c112 9 Dove‘lt since future development will cause this area to con- 7nitrc.0 tribute to the storm water runoff. Actual area within w ry Q,4. the plat = 1.65 acres. 0.w. Area = 5.4 acres I = 0.3 T = 13.0 min. S = 0.005 c L = 400 feet R = 2.4 n = 0.4 C = 0.15 Q = 3.88 cfs 50 -year storm 50 -year storm NOTE: Actual area within plat = 2.94 acres while 5.40 acres is the total contribution area when future development is completed. T = 18.00 min. R = 2.15 50 -year storm Summerfiel.d Fast Addition Storm Drainage Report Page Three Suh -Area 6 Suh -Area 7 Suh -Area 8 Area = 2.25 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.001 L = 500 feet n = 0.4 C t = 0.15 eP Q = 1'.08 cfs J 50 -year storm Q = 1.44' cfs ` 50 -year storm Area = 2.2 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.006 L = 350 feet n = 0.4 C = 0.15 T = 26.87 min. R = 1.6 50 -year storm Area = 2.0 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.006 L = 450 feet n = 0.4 C = 0.15 4' Jdt Ir. 3 X' NOTE: Olympic Avenue is on the upland side of the drainage area, therefore, much of the storm water runoff is away from the street. T = 15.70 min. R = 2.4 50 -year storm T = 13.50 min. R = 1.9 10 -year storm 0 = 1.25 cfs 10 -year storm I.7y S� NOTE: Only 0.92 acres of the 2.2 acre drainage area is actually within the plat boundary. in Summerfield East Addition Storm Drainage Report Page Four Sub -Arta 9 Area = 2.95 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.009 L = 450 feet n = 0.4 C = 0.15 Sub-Area 10 Q = 1.68 cfs' Area = 3.1 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.012 L = 500 feet n = 0.4 C = 0.15 Sub -Area 11 Area = 1.3 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.007 L = 420 feet n = 0.4 C = 0.15 Sub -Area 12 Q = 2.42 cfs 50 -year storm = 0.98 cfs 50 -year storm Area = 3.7 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.006 L = 600 feet n = 0.4 C = 0.15 T c = 13.90 min. R = 1.9 10 -year storm 10 -year storm So 1.3 Q = 2.33 cfs 50 -year storm T c = 13.58 min. R = 2.6 50 -year storm T c = 14.37 min. R = 2.5 50 -year storm T = 18.65 min. c R = 2.1 50 -year storm Summerfield East Addition Storm Drainage Report Page Five The present design includes 17 double barrel drywells and 2 single barrel drywells. Since some of the drainage areas included land outside of the plat boundary which is subject to future development and installation of drywells, and con- sidering the high permeability of the soil, it is felt that this design is sufficient to handle the anticipated runoff. INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION 3 mes M. Paulson 41040 dAdigehv /21/79 MEMO TO: FEMA CORRESPONDENCE FILE, RIDGEMONT R. HORMANN AND G. NELSON FROM: BRENDA SIM DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1991 SUBJECT: RIDGEMONT AND SUMMERFIELD AND FORKER DRAW FLOOD FLOWS On February 13 Ken Tupper and Chuck Simpson came in to discuss Ridgemont and Summerfield East. On Ridgemont Tammie told them what she had learned from the files, i.e. that the files are unclear as to whether the pond was designed to accommodate flow from all the proposed "upstream" developments or not. Tupper said he would have Dick Mason get back to us. We suggested that starting from scratch to determine the flows the pond needs to handle would probably be simplest since any new developments will have to meet the stormwater requirements in place when the development occurs. The original Ridgemont work was done before the guidelines were formalized. Tupper's objective is to re -work the stormwater pond to make it smaller and probably deeper. He wants to free up land for additional lots where the pond is currently. Tupper would like to begin work on Summerfield very soon. He wanted to know what he needed to do for the floodplain issue. I told him that we have heard rumors but have nothing in writing to state that all homes on alluvial fans will need flood insurance. If Tupper wants to remove all of Summerfield from the flood zone, he would need to design a stormwater facility to take a hundred year storm. He wanted to know what flow that is. I told him I would contact FEMA for that information. Tupper said he owns property north of Progress and east of Forker (upstream of Summerfield) that could be used for a stormwater facility or he could use the land under the power lines in Summerfield. On February 15 I cal ed Alan Johnson at FEMA. I told him the information I needed and why I need it. He said -the flood flows /are: 2 i/� 3 3 at the apex 452 cfs plus debris load 7 � on the fan 590 cfs plus debris load (I think) i~ He said I should call Larry Basich to get the latest NFI regs re: alluvial fans. He thinks the regs came out in 1989. He referred to section 65.13. He said I should tell the developer that in designing the stormwater facility, he should design for debris load and to meet all the other special requirements for alluvial fans. I called Basich who was not in, but the person who answered said she would copy the regs and send them to me. I called Tupper's office and left word that I will send him the info. as soon as it comes in. LE, SUMMERFIELD FILE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Ken Tupper Star Broker - Tupper E 12929 Sprague Spokane, WA 99216 Dear Mr. Tupper: On February 13, I contacted the Federal Emergency Management Agency for the 100 -year flood flows associated with Forker Draw. FEMA gave me these figures: at the apex on the fan 452 cubic feet per second plus debris load 590 cfs plus debris load FEMA said that your engineer will need to design a facility to handle the flows and the debris load and to meet all the other requirements in the National Flood Insurance Program regulations. He specifically referred to the "new" alluvial fan regulations. The regional FEMA office supplied me with the alluvial fan regulations, which are enclosed. I have also enclosed the most recent version of the basic regulations in part 65 referring to mapping of floodplains. I hope this information is what you need. Please let us know if we can be of additional help. \b \f\1 \tup21991 N. 811 Jefferson A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director February 19, 1991 Sincerely, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. YOU r— C n Brenda Sims Drainage Planning Coordinator Spokane, WA 99260 -0180 15091456-3600 FAX (509) 456 -4715 Federal Emergency Management Agency §65 :13 §65.13 Mapping and map revisions for areas subject to alluvial fan flooding. This section describes the procedures to be followed and the types of information FEMA needs to recognize On a NFIP map that . a structural flood control measure provides pro- tection from the base flood in an area subject to allu vial fan flooding. This in- formation must be supplied to FEMA by the community or other party seeking recogni- tion of such a flood control measure at the time a flood risk study or restudy is con- ducted, when a map revision under the provisions of part 65 of this subchapter is sought, and upon request by the Administrator during the review of previously recog- nized flood control measures. The FEMA review will be for the sole purpose of estab- lishing appropriate risk zone determinations for NFIP maps and shall not constitute a determination by FEMA as to how the flood control measure will perform in a flood event. (a) The applicable provi- sions of § §65.2, 65.3,,65.4, 65.6, 65.8 and 65.10 shall also apply to FIRM revisions involving alluvial fan flood- ing. (b) The provisions of §65.5 regarding map revisions based on fill and the provisions of 361 part 70 of this chapter shall not apply to FIRM revisions involving alluvial fan flood- ing. In general, elevation of a parcel of land or a, structure by fill . or other' means, will not serve As . a :s basis for removing areas-:sub- ject to alluvial fan flooding from an area of special flood hazards. (c) FEMA will credit on NFIP maps only major struc- tural flood control measures whose design and construction are supported by sound engi- neering analyses which demon strate that the measures will effectively eliminate alluvial fan flood hazards from the area protected by such mea- sures. The provided analyses must include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following :' (1) Engineering analyses that quantify the discharges and volumes of water, debris, and sediment movement associ- ated with the flood that has a one - percent probability of being exceeded in any year at the apex under current water- shed conditions and under po- tential adverse conditions (e.g., deforestation of the watershed by fire). The po- tential for debris flow and sediment movement must be assessed using an engineering method acceptable to FEMA. The assessment should con- sider the characteristics and availability of sediment in the drainage basin above the apex and on the alluvial fan. 565.13 (2) Engineering analyses showing that the measures will accommodate the esti- mated peak -discharges and volumes of water, debris, and sediment, as determined in accordance with paragraph (c) (1) of this section, and will withstand the associated hydrodynamic and hydrostatic forces. (3) Engineering analyses showing that the measures have been designed to with- stand the potential erosion and scour associated .with estimated discharges. (4) Engineering analyses or evidence showing that the measures will provide protec- tion from hazards associated with the possible relocation of flow paths from other parts of the fan. (5) Engineering analyses that assess the effect of the project on flood hazards,.in- cluding depth and velocity of floodwaters and scour and sediment deposition, on other areas of the fan. (6) Engineering analyses demonstrating that flooding from sources other than the fan apex, including local runoff, is either insignifi- cant or has been accounted for in the design. (d) Coordination. FEMA will recognize measures that are adequately designed and constructed, provided that: evidence is submitted to show that the impact of the mea- 362 44 CFR Ch. 1 (10 - 1 - 88 Edition) sures on flood hazards in all areas of the fan (including those not protected by the. flood control measures), and the design and maintenance requirements of the measures, were reviewed and approved by the impacted communities, and also by State and local agen- cies that have jurisdiction over flood control activities. (e) Operation and Mainte- nance Plans and Criteria. The requirements for opera- tion and maintenance of flood control measures on areas .subject to alluvial fan flooding • shall ipe those specified under 565.10, para- graphs (c) and (d) when applicable. (f) Certification Require- ments. Data submitted to support that a given flood control measure complies with the requirements set forth in paragraphs (c)(1) through (6) of this section - must be certified by a registered professional engineer. Also, certified as - built plans of the flood control measures must be submitted. Certifi- cations are subject to the definition given at 565.2. §65.14 List of communities submitting new technical data. This section provides a cumulative list of communities where modifica- §64.5 the area remain in force. In the event that the newly - acquired area was pre- viously located in a community not participating in the Program, the pro- visions of the section shall only apply if the community, upon acquisition, and pending formal adoption of the amendments to its flood plain manage- ment regulations, certifies in writing over the signature of a community of- ficial that it shall enforce within the newly -month period, existing flood in- surance policies shall remain in effect untll their date of expiration may be renewed. and new policies may be issued. Failure to satisfy the applica- ble requirements in § 60.3 shall result in the community's suspension from Program participation pursuant to § 59.24 of this subchapter. (c) When an area previously a part of a community participating in the Program becomes autonomous or be- comes a portion of a newly autono- mous community resulting from boundary changes, governmental reor- ganization, changes in state statutes or constitution, or otherwise, such new community shall be given six months from the date of its independence, to adopt flood plain management regula- tions within the special hazard areas subject to Its Jurisdiction and to submit its application for participation as a separate community in order to retain eligibility for the sale of flood insurance The regulations adopted by such new community shall satisfy the applicable requirements in § 60.3 of this subchapter based on the data pre- viously provided by the Administrator. The provisions of this section shall only apply where the new community upon the date of Its independence cer- tifies in writing over the signature of a community official that, pending formal adoption of flood plain man- agement regulations, the flood plain management requirements previously applicable in that area remain in effect. During the six month period, existing flood insurance policies shall remain in effect until their dates of expiration may be renewed, and new policies may be issued. Failure to satis- fy the applicable requirements in 4 60.3 of this subchapter shall result in the community's suspension from Pro- 348 44 CFR Ch. 1 (10 -1 -88 Edition) gram participation pursuant to § 59.24 of this subchapter. (d) Where any community or any area within a community had in effect a FEIBM or FIRM, but all or a portion of that community has been acquired by another community, or becomes au- tonomous, that map shall remain in effect until it Is superseded by the Ad- ministrator, whether by republication as part of the map of the acquiring community, or otherwise. (e) When a community described in paragraph (a), (b), (c), or (d) of this section has flood elevations in effect, no new appeal period under Parts 66, 67, and 68 of this subchapter will begin except as new scientific and technical data are available. (41 FR 46986, Oct. 26, 1976. Redesignated at 44 FR 31177, May 31, 1979, and amended at 48 FR 44552, Sept. 29, 1983: 49 FR 4751, Feb. 8, 19841 9 64.5 Relationship of rates to zone desig- nations. (a) In order to expedite a communi- ty's qualification for flood insurance under the emergency program, the Ad- ministrator may authorize the sale of such insurance without designating any Zones A, M, or E within a commu- nity, provided the community has pre- viously adopted flood plain manage- ment regulations meeting the require- ments of § 60.3(a), § 60.4(a) or § 60.5(a) of this subchapter. When the Adminis- trator has obtained sufficient techni- cal information to delineate Zones A, M, or E, he /she shall delineate the tentative boundaries on a FFIBM (b) Upon the effective date of the FIRM, flood Insurance will continue to be available throughout the entire community at chargeable rates (i.e., subsidized) for first layer coverage of existing structures, but will be only available at risk premium rates for all new construction and substantial im- provements. Upon the effective date of a FIRM, second layer coverage is available only at risk premium rates for all structures. (c) Detailed Insurance information may be obtained from the servicing companies. See Part 62 of this sub- chapter. Federal Emergency Management Agency § 65.3 [41 FR 46986, Oct. 26, 1976. Redesignated at 44 FR 31177. May 31, 1979, and amended at 48 FR 44552, Sept. 29, 1983; 49 FR 4751, Feb. 8, 1984] 9 64.6 List of eligible communities. The sale of flood insurance pursuant to the National Flood Insurance Pro- gram (42 U.S.C. 4001 -4128) is author- ized for the communities set forth under this section. Previous listings under this part continue in effect until revised. [41 FR 46986, Oct. 25, 1976] EDIrmRIAt NOTE: For references to FR pages showing lists of eligible communities, see the List of CFR Sections Affected ap- pearing in the Finding Aids section of this volume. PART 65- IDENTIFICATION AND MAPPING OF SPECIAL HAZARD AREAS Sec. 65.1 Purpose of part. 65.2 Definitions. 65.3 Requirement to submit new technical data. 65.4 Right to submit new technical data. 653 Revision to special hazard area bound- aries with no change to base flood eleva- tion determinations. 65.6 Revision of base flood elevation deter- minations. 65.7 Floodway revisions. 65.8 Review of proposed projects. 65.9 Review and response by the Adminis- trator. 65.10 Mapping of areas protected by levee systems. 65.11 Evaluation of sand dunes in mapping coastal flood hazard areas. 65.12 Revision of flood insurance rate maps to reflect base flood elevations caused by proposed encroachments. 65.13 List of communities submitting new technical data. Aoraoarrv: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorga- nlzatlon Plan No. 3 of 1978; E.O. 12127. 9 65.1 Purpose of part. 42 U.S.C. 4104 authorizes the Direc- tor to identify and publish informa- tion with respect to all areas within the United States having special flood, mudslide (Le., mudflow) and flood -re- lated erosion hazards. The purpose of this part is to outline the steps a com- munity needs to take in order to assist the Agency's effort in providing up -to- 349 date identification and publication, in the form of the maps described in Part 64, on special flood, mudslide (i.e., mudflow) and flood - related erosion hazards. [48 FR 28278, June 21, 1983] (165.2 Definitions. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this part, the definitions set forth in Part 59 of this subchapter are applica- ble to this part. (b) For the purpose of this part, a certification by a registered profes- sional engineer or other party does not constitute a warranty or guarantee of performance, expressed or Implies"°. Certification of data is a statemer'. that the data is accurate to the best of the certifier's knowledge. Certification of analyses is a statement that the analyses have been performed correct- ly and in accordance with sound engi- neering practices. Certification of structural works is a statement that the works are designed in accordance with sound engineering practices to provide protection from the base flood. Certification of as built" condi- , Dons is a statement that the structure(s) has been built according to the plans being certified, is in place, -, and Is fully functioning. [51 FR 30313, Aug. 25, 19861 9 65.3 Requirement to submit new techni- cal data. A community's base flood elevations may increase or decrease resulting from physical changes affecting flood- ing conditions. As soon as practicable, but not later than six months after the date such information becomes available, a community shall notify the Administrator of the changes by submitting technical or scientific data in accordance with this part. Such a submission is necessary so that upon confirmation of those physical changes affecting flooding conditions, risk premium rates and flood plain management requirements will be based upon current data. (51 FR 30313, Aug. 25. 1986] § 65.4 9 65.4 Right to submit new technical data. (a) A community has a right to re- quest changes to any of the informa- tion shown on an effective map that does not impact flood plain or flood - way delineations or base flood eleva- tions, such as community boundary changes, labeling. or planimetrlc de- tails. Such a submission shall include appropriate supporting documentation in accordance with this part and may be submitted at any time. (b) All requests for changes to effec- tive maps, other than those initiated by FEMA, must be made in writing by the Chief Executive Officer of the community (CEO) or an official desig- nated by the CEO. Should the CEO refuse to submit such a request on behalf of another party, FEMA will agree to review it only if written evi- dence is provided indicating the CEO or designee has been requested to do so. (51 FR 30313. Aug. 25, 1986] 9 65.5 Revision to special hazard area boundaries with no change to base flood elevation determinations. (a) Data requirements for topograph- ic changes. In many areas of special flood hazard (excluding V zones and floodways) it may be feasible to ele- vate areas with earth fill above the base flood elevation. Scientific and technical Information to support a re- quest to gain exclusion from an area of special flood hazard of a structure or parcel of land that has been elevat- ed by the placement of fill shall in- clude the following: (1) A copy of the recorded deed Indi- cating the legal description of the property and the official recordation information (deed book volume and page number) and bearing the seal of the appropriate recordation official (e.g., County Clerk or Recorder of Deeds). (2) If the property is recorded on a plat map, a copy of the recorded plat indicating both the location of the property and the official recordation information (plat book volume and page number) and bearing the seal of the appropriate recordation official. If the property is not recorded on a plat map, copies of the tax map or other 350 44 CFR Ch. I (10-1 -88 Edition) suitable maps are required to aid FEMA m accurately locating the prop- erty., (3) If a legally defined parcel of land Is involved, a topographic map indicat- ing present ground elevations and date of fill. FEMA's determination as to whether a legally defined parcel of land is to be excluded from the area of special flood hazard shall be based upon a comparison of the ground ele- vations of the parcel with the eleva- tions of the base flood. If the ground elevations of the entire legally defined parcel of land are at or above the ele- vations of the base flood, the parcel may be excluded from the area of spe- cial flood hazard. (4) If a structure is Involved, a topo- graphic map indicating structure loca- tion and ground elevations including the elevations of the lowest floor (in- cluding basement) and the lowest ad- jacent grade to the structure. FEMA s determination as to whether a struc- ture is to be excluded from the area of special flood hazard shall be based upon a comparison of the elevation of the lowest floor (including basement) and the elevation of the lowest adja- cent grade with the elevation of the base flood. If the entire structure and the lowest adjacent grade are at or above the elevation of the base flood, the structure may be excluded from the area of special flood hazard. (5) Data to substantiate the base flood elevation. If FEMA has complet- ed a Flood Insurance Study (FIS), that data will be used to substantiate the base flood. Otherwise, data provid- ed by an authoritative source, such as the 17.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Geological Survey, US. Soil Con- servation Service, state and local water resource departments, or technical data prepared and certified by a regis- tered professional engineer may be submitted. If base flood elevations have not previously been established, hydraulic calculations may also be re- quested. (6) Where fill has been placed to raise the ground surface to or above the base flood elevation and the re- quest to gain exclusion from an area of special flood hazard includes more than a single structure or a single lot, It must be demonstrated that fill will Federal Emergency Management Agency § 65.6 not settle below the elevation of the base flood, and that the fill is ade- quately protected from the forces of erosion, scour, or differential settle- ment as described below: (i) Fill must be compacted to 95 per- cent of the maximum density obtain- able with the Standard Proctor Test method issued by the American Socie- ty for Testing and Materials (ASTM Standard D -698). This requirement applies to fill pads prepared for resi- dential or commercial structure foun- dations and does not apply to filled areas intended for other uses. (ii) Fill slopes for granular materials are not steeper than one vertical on one - and - one -half horizontal unless substantiating data justifying steeper slopes is submitted. (iii) Adequate protection is provided fill slopes exposed to flood waters with expected velocities during the occur- rence of the base flood of five feet per second or less by covering them with grass, vines, weeds, or similar vegeta- tion undergrowth. (iv) Adequate protection is provided fill slopes exposed to flood waters with velocities during the occurrence of the base flood of greater than five feet per second by armoring them with stone or rock slope protection. (7) A revision of flood plain delinea- tions based on fill must demonstrate that any such fill has not resulted in a floodway encroachment. (b) New topographic data. The pro- cedures described in paragraphs (a) (1) through (5) of this section may be also followed to request a map revision when no physical changes have oc- curred in the area of special flood hazard, when no fill has been placed, and when the natural ground eleva- tions, as evidenced by new topographic maps, more detailed or more accurate than those used to prepare the map to be revised, are shown to be above the elevation of the base flood. (c) Certification requirements. The Items required in paragraphs (a) (3) and (4) and (b) of this section shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or licensed land surveyor. Items required in paragraph (a)(6) of this section shall be certified by the community s NFIP permit official, a registered professional engineer, or an 351 accredited soils engineer. Such certifi- cations are subject to the provisions of § 65.2 of this subchapter. (d) Submission procedures. All re- quests shall be submitted to the appro- priate FEMA Regional Office servicing the community's geographic area. (51 FR 30313, Aug. 25. 1988) 9 65.6 Revision of base flood elevation de- terminations. (a) General conditions and data re- quirements. (1) The supporting data must include all the information FEMA needs to review and evaluate the request. This may involve the re- questor's performing new hydrologic and hydraulic analysis and delineation of new flood plain boundaries a$ floodways, as necessary. (2) To avoid discontinuities between the revised and unrevised flood data, the necessary hydrologic and hydrau- lic analyses submitted by the map re- vision requestor must be extensive enough to ensure that a logical transi- tion can be shown between the revised flood elevations, flood plain bound- aries, and floodways and those devel- oped previously for areas not affected by the revision. Unless it is demon- strated that it would not be appropri- ate. the revised and unrevised base flood elevations must match within one -half foot where such transitions occur. (3) Revisions cannot be made based on the effects of proposed projects or future conditions. Section 65 8 of this subchapter contains provisions for ob- taining conditional approval of pro posed projects that may effect map changes when they are completed. (4) The datum and date of releveling of benchmarks, if any, to which the elevations are referenced must be indi- cated. (5) Maps will not be revised when discharges change as a result of the use of an alternative methodology or data for computing flood discharges unless the change is statistically sig- nificant as measured by a confidence limits analysis of the new discharge es- timates. (6) In order for an alternative hy- draulic or hydrologic methodology to be accepted, any computer program used must be accepted for general use by a governmental agency or notable scientific body, must be well docu- mented including a user's and pro- grammer's manual, and must be avail- able to the general user. (7) A revised hydrologic analysis for flooding sources with established base flood elevations must include evalua- tion of the same recurrence interval(s) studied in the effective FIS, such as the 10 -, 50 -, 100 -, and 500 -year flood discharges. (8) A revised hydraulic analysis for a flooding source with established base flood elevations must include evalua- tion of the same recurrence interval(s) studied in the effective FIS, such as the 10 -, 50 -, 100 -, and 500 -year flood elevations, and of the floodway. 'Unless the basis of the request is the use of an alternative hydraulic methodology or the requestor can demonstrate that the data of the original hydraulic com- puter model is unavailable or its use is inappropriate, the analysis shall be made using the same hydraulic com- puter model used to develop the base flood elevations shown on the effec- tive Flood Insurance Rate Map and updated to show present conditions in the flood plain. Copies of the input and output data from the original and -evised hydraulic analyses shall be submitted. (9) A hydrologic or hydraulic analy- sis for a flooding source without estab- 'ished base flood elevations may be )erformed for only the 100 -year flood. (10) A revision of flood plain delinea- :ions based on topographic changes nust demonstrate that any topograph- c changes have not resulted in a loodway encroachment. (11) Delineations of flood plain )oundaries for a flooding source with : stablished base flood elevations must )rovide both the 100- and 500 -year food plain boundaries. For flooding .ources without established base flood devotions, only 100 -year flood plain ■oundaries need be submitted. These )oundaries should be shown on a topo- .raphic map of suitable scale and con - our interval. (12) If a community or other party °eks recognition from FEMA, on its 'lBM or FIRM, that an altered or re- peated portion of a watercourse pro- 352 44 CFR Ch. 1 (10 -148 Edition) vides protection from, or mitigates po- tential hazards of, the base flood, the Administrator may request specific documentation from the community certifying that, and describing how, the provisions of §60.3(b)(7) of this subchapter will be met for the particu- lar watercourse involved. This docu- mentation, which may be in the form of a written statement from the Com- munity Chief Executive Officer, an or- dinance, or other legislative action, shall describe the nature of the main- tenance activities to be performed, the frequency with which they will be per- formed, and the title of the local com- munity official who will be responsible for assuring that the maintenance ac- tivities are accomplished. (13) Notwithstanding any other pro- visions of § 65.6, a community may submit, in lieu of the documentation specified in §65.6(a)(12), certification by a registered professional engineer that the project has been designed to retain its flood carrying capacity with- out periodic maintenance. (b) Data requirements for correcting map errors. To correct errors in the original flood analysis, technical data submissions shall include the follow- ing: (1) Data identifying mathematical errors. (2) Data identifying measurement errors and providing correct measure- ments. (c) Data requirements for changed physical conditions. Revisions based on the effects of physical changes that have occurred in the flood plain shall include: (1) Changes affecting hydrologic con- ditions. The following data must be submitted: (1) General description of the changes (e.g., dam, diversion channel, or detention basin). (11) Construction plans for as -built conditions, if applicable. (ill) New hydrologic analysis ac- counting for the effects of the changes. (iv) New hydraulic analysis and pro- files using the new .flood discharge values resulting from the hydrologic analysis. (v) Revised delineations of the flood plain boundaries and floodway. Federal Emergency Management Age (2) Changes affecting hydraulic con- ditions. The following data shall be submitted: (i) General description of the changes (e.g., channelization or new bridge, culvert, or levee). (ii) Construction plans for as -built conditions. (iii) New hydraulic analysis and flood elevation profiles accounting for the effects of the changes and using the original flood discharge values upon which the original map is based. (iv) Revised delineations of the flood plain boundaries and floodway. (3) Changes involving topographic conditions. The following data shall be submitted: (i) General description of the changes (e.g., grading or filling). (ii) New topographic information, such as spot elevations, cross sections grading plans, or contour maps. (iii) Revised delineations of the flood plain boundaries and, if necessary, floodway. (d) Data requirements for incorpo- rating improved data- Requests for re- visions based on the use of improved hydrologic, hydraulic, or topographic data shall include the following data: (1) Data that are believed to be better than those used in the original analysis (such as additional years of stream gage data). (2) Documentation of the source of the data. (3) Explanation as to why the use of the new data will improve the results of the original analysis. (4) Revised hydrologic analysis where hydrologic data are being incor- porated. (5) Revised hydraulic analysis and flood elevation profiles where new hy- drologic or hydraulic data are being incorporated. (6) Revised delineations of the flood plain boundaries and floodway where new hydrologic, hydraulic, or topo- graphic data are being incorporated. (e) Data requirements for incorpo- rating improved methods. Requests for revisions based on the use of im- proved hydrologic or hydraulic meth- odology shall include the following data: 353 ncy § 65.7 (1) New hydrologic analysis when an alternative hydrologic methodology is being proposed. (2) New hydraulic analysis and flood elevation profiles when an alternative hyrologlc or hydraulic methodology is being proposed. (3) Explanation as to why the alter- native methodologies are superior to the original methodologies. (4) Revised delineations of the flood plain boundaries and floodway based on the new analysis(es). (1) Certification requirements. All analysis and data submitted by the re- quester shall be certified by a regis- tered professional engineer or licensed land surveyor, as appropriate, subject to the definition of "certificatS" given at § 65.2 of this subchapter - (g) Submission procedures. All re- quests shall be submitted to the appro- priate FEMA Regional Office servicing the community's geographic area. [51 FR 30314, Aug. 25, 1986, as amended at 53 FR 16279, May 6, 1988] § 65.7 Floodway revisions. (a) General Floodway data is devel- oped as part of FEMA Flood Insur- . ance Studies and is utilized by commu- nities to select and adopt floodways as part of the flood plain management program required by § 60.3 of this sub- chapter. When it has been determined • by a community that no practicable al- ternatives exist to revising the bound- aries of its previously adopted flood- way, the procedures below shall be fol- lowed. (b) Data requirements when bas flood elevation changes are requested. When a floodway revision Is requested in association with a change to base flood elevations, the data require- ments of § 65.6 shall also be applica- ble. In addition, the following docu- mentation shall be submitted: (1) Copy of a public notice distribut- ed by the community stating the com- munity's intent to revise the floodway or a statement by the community that it has notified all affected property owners and affected adjacent jurisdic- tions. (2) Copy of a letter notifying the ap- propriate State agency of the flood- way revision when the State has juris- § 65.8 diction over the floodway or its adop- tion by communities participating in the NFIP. (3) Documentation of the approval of the revised floodway by the appro- whee the State has jurisdiction communities oover the floodway or its adoption by com- munities participating in the NFIP). (4) Engineering analysis for the re- vised floodway, as described below: (i) The floodway analysis must be performed using the hydraulic com- puter model used to determine the proposed base flood elevations. (ill The floodway limits must be set so that neither the effective base flood elevations nor the proposed base flood elevations if less than the effective base flood elevations, are increased by more than the amount specified under § 60.3 (d)(2). Copies of the input and output data from the original and modified computer models must be submitted. (5) Delineation of the revised flood- way on the same topographic map used for the delineation of the revised flood boundaries. (c) Data requirements for changes not associated with base flood eleva- tion changes. The following data shall be submitted: (1) Items described in paragraphs (b) (1) through (3) of this section must be submitted. (2) Engineering analysis for the re- vised floodway, as described below: (i) The original hydraulic computer model used to develop the established base flood elevations must be modified to include all encroachments that have occurred in the flood plain since the existing floodway was developed. If the original hydraulic computer model Is not available, an alternate hy- draulic computer model may be used provided the alternate model has been calibrated so as to reproduce the origi- nal water surface profile of the origi- nal hydraulic computer modeL The al- ternate model must be then modified to include all encroachments that have occurred since the existing flood- way was developed. (11) The floodway analysis must be performed with the modified comput- er model using the desired floodway limits. 44 CFR Ch. 1 (10 - 148 Edition) (Ili) The floodway limits must be set so that combined effects of the past encroachments and the new floodway limits do not increase the effective base flood elevations by more than the amount specified in § 60.3(d)(2). Copies of the input and output data from the original and modified com- puter models must be submitted. . (3) Delineation of the revised flood- way on a copy of the effective NFIP map and a suitable topographic map. (d) Certification requirements. All analyses submitted shall be certified by a registered professional engineer. All topographic data shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or licensed land surveyor. Certifica- tions are subject to the definition given at § 85.2 of this subchapter. (e) Submission procedures. All re- quests that involve changes to flood - ways shall be submitted to the appro- priate FEMA Regional Office servicing the community's geographic area. [51 FR 30315, Aug. 25. 1986] 5 65.8 Review of proposed projects. A community, or individual through the community, wishing FEMA s com- ments on whether a proposed project, if built as proposed, would justify a map revision may request a Condition- al Letter of Map Amendment or Revi- sion in accordance with Part 72 of this subchapter. The data required to sup- port such requests are the same as those required to support requests for revisions in accordance with §§ 65.5, 65.6, and 65.7, except as -built certifica- tion 1s not required. [51 FR 30315, Aug. 25. 1986) 5 65.9 Review and response by the Admin- istrator. 11 any questions or problems arise during review, FEMA will consult the Chief Executive Officer of the commu- nity (CEO), the community official designated by the CEO, and /or the re- quester for resolution. Upon receipt of a revision request, the Administrator shall mail an acknowledgment of re- ceipt of such request to the CEO. Within 90 days of receiving the re- quest with all necessary information, 354 Federal Emergency Management Agency § 65.R the Administrator shall notify the CEO of one or more of the following: (a) The effective map(s) shall not be modified; (b) The base flood elevations on the effective FIRM shall be modified and new base flood elevations shall be es- tablished under the provisions of Part 67 of this subchapter; (c) The changes requested are ap- proved and the map(s) amended by Letter of Map Revision (LOMR); (d) The changes requested are ap- proved and a revised map(s) will be printed and distributed; (e) The changes requested are not of such a significant nature as to warrant a reissuance or revision of the flood in- surance study or maps and will be de- ferred until such time as a significant change occurs; (f) An additional 90 days is required to evaluate the scientific or technical data submitted; or (g) Additional data are required to support the revision request. (51 FR 30315. Aug. 25, 1986) 565.10 Mapping of areas protected by levee systems. (a) General. For purposes of the NFIP, FEMA will only recognize in its flood hazard and risk mapping effort those levee systems that meet, and continue to meet, minimum design, op- eration, and maintenance standards that are consistent with the level of protection sought through the com- prehensive flood plain management criteria established by § 60.3 of this subchapter. Accordingly, this section describes the types of information FEMA needs to recognize, on NFIP maps. that a levee system provides protection from the base flood. This information must be supplied to FEMA by the community or other party seeking recognition of such a levee system at the time a flood risk study or restudy is conducted, when a map revision under the provisions of Part 65 of this subchapter is sought based on a levee system. and upon re- quest by the Administrator during the review of previously recognized struc- tures. The FEMA review will be for the sole purpose of establishing appro- priate risk zone determinations for NFIP maps and shall not constitute a 355 determination by FEMA as to' how structure or system will perform in flood event. (b) Design criteria. For levees to b, recognized by FEMA, evidence tha adequate design and operation ant maintenance systems are in place tA provide reasonable assurance that pro tection from the base flood exist: must be provided. The following re quirements must be met: (1) Freeboard. (1) Riverine levee. must provide a minimum freeboard o three feet above the water - surface level of the base flood. An additiona one foot above the minimum is re quired within 100 feet in either side o structures (such as bridges) river3r1 of the levee or wherever the fgt i constricted. An 'additional one Al foot above the minimum at the ui stream end of the levee, tapering t not less than the minimum at th downstream end of the levee. is a)s.. required. (ii) Occasionally, exceptions to th. minimum riverine freeboard requirc went described in paragraph (b)(1)(! of this section, may be approved. Ac propriate engineering analyses demor. strating adequate protection with lesser freeboard must be submitted t. support a request for such an excei. tion. The material presented mus evaluate the uncertainty in the est - mated base flood elevation profile an include, but not necessarily be limite to an assessment of statistical con' dente limits of the 100 -year discharg( changes in stage - discharge relattnt ships; and the sources, potential, magnitude of debris, sediment, ant. accumulation. It must be also show that the levee will remain structural) stable during the base flood whe such additional loading considerattor are imposed. Under no circumstance will freeboard of less than two feet t accepted. (iii) For coastal levees, the freeboar must be established at one foot abot the height of the one percent wave c the maximum wave runup (whicheve is greater) associated with the 10! year stillwater surge elevation at tt site. (iv) Occasionally, exceptions to ti minimum coastal levee freeboard r quirement described in paragrai § 65.10 (b)(1)(11i) of this section, may be ap- proved. Appropriate engineering anal- yses demonstrating adequate protec- tion with a lesser freeboard must be submitted to support a request for such an exception. The material pre- sented must evaluate the uncertainty in the estimated base flood loading conditions. Particular emphasis must be placed on the effects of wave attack and overtopping on the stability of the levee. Fader no circumstances, howev- er, will a freeboard of less than two feet above the 100 -year stillwater surge elevation be accepted. (2) Closures. All openings must be provided with closure devices that are structural parts of the system during operation and design according to sound engineering practice. (3) Embankment protection. Engi- neering analyses must be submitted that demonstrate that no appreciable erosion of the levee embankment can be expected during the base flood, as a result of either currents or waves, and that anticipated erosion will not result in failure of the levee embankment or foundation directly or indirectly through reduction of the seepage path and subsequent instability. The fac- tors to be addressed in such analyses include, but are not limited to: Expect- ed flow velocities (especially in con- stricted areas); expected wind and wave action; ice loading; impact of debris; slope protection techniques; duration of flooding at various stages and velocities; embankment and foun- dation materials; levee alignment, bends, and transitions; and levee side slopes. (4) Embankment and foundation stability. Engineering analyses that evaluate levee embankment stability must be submitted. The analyses pro- vided shall evaluate expected seepage during loading conditions associated with the base flood and shall demon- strate that seepage into or through the levee foundation and embankment will not jeopardize embankment or foundation stability. An alternative analysis demonstrating that the levee is designed and constructed for stabili- ty against loading conditions for Case IV as defined in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) manual, "Design and Construction of Levees" (EM 356 44 CFR Ch. 1 (10 -1 -88 Edition) 1110 -2 -1913, Chapter 6, Section II), may be used. The factors that shall be addressed in the analyses include: Depth of flooding, duration of flood- ing, embankment geometry and length of seepage path at critical locations, embankment and foundation materi- als, embankment compaction, penetra- tions, other design factors affecting seepage (such as drainage layers), and other design factors affecting embank- ment and foundation stability (such as berms). (5) Settlement. Engineering analyses must be submitted that assess the po- tential and magnitude of future losses of freeboard as a result of levee settle- ment and demonstrate that freeboard will be maintained within the mini- mum standards set forth in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. This analysis must address embankment loads, com- pressibility of embankment sots, com- pressibility of foundation soils, age of the levee system, and construction compaction methods. In addition. de- tailed settlement analysis using proce- dures such as those described in the COE • manual, "Soil Mechanics Design — Settlement Analysis" (EM 1100 -2 -1904) must be submitted. (6) Interior drainage. An analysis must be submitted that identifies the source(s) of such flooding, the extent of the flooded area, and, if the average depth is greater than one foot, the water - surface elevation(s) of the base flood. This analysis must be based on the joint probability of interior and exterior flooding and the capacity of facilities (such as drainage lines and pumps) for evacuating interior flood- waters. (7) Other design criteria. In unique situations, such as those where the levee system has relatively high vul- nerability, FEMA may require that other design criteria and analyses be submitted to show that the levees pro- vide adequate protection. In such situ- ations, sound engineering practice will be the standard on which FEMA will base its determinations. FEMA will also provide the rationale for requir- ing this additional information. (c) Operation plans and criteria. For a levee system to be recognized, the operational criteria must be as de- scribed below. All closure devices or Federal Emergency Management Agency § mechanical systems for internal drain- age, whether manual or automatic, must be operated in accordance with an officially adopted operation manual, a copy of which must be pro- vided to FEMA by the operator when levee or drainage system recognition is being sought or when the manual for a previously recognized system is re- vised in any manner. All operations must be under the jurisdiction of a Federal or State agency, an agency created by Federal or State law, or an agency of a community participating in the NFIP. (1) Closures. Operation plans for clo- sures must include the following: (i) Documentation of the flood warn- ing system, under the jurisdiction of Federal, State, or community officials, that will be used to trigger emergency operation activities and demonstration that sufficient flood warning time exists for the completed operation of all closure structures, including neces- sary sealing, before floodwaters reach the base of the closure. (ii) A formal plan of operation in- cluding specific actions and assign- ments of responsibility by individual name or title. (iii) Provisions for periodic oper- ation, at not less than one -year inter- vals, of the closure structure for test- ing and training purposes. (2) Interior drainage systems. Interi- or drainage systems associated with levee systems usually include storage areas, gravity outlets, pumping sta- tions, or a combination thereof. These drainage systems will be recognized by FEMA on NFIP maps for flood protec- tion purposes only if the following minimum criteria are included in the operation plan: (1) Documentation of the flood warn- ing system, under the jurisdiction of Federal, State, or community officials, that will be used to trigger emergency operation activities and demonstration that sufficient flood warning time exists to permit activation of mecha- nized portions of the drainage system. (ii) A formal plan of operation in- cluding specific actions and assign- ments of responsibility by individual name or title. (iii) Provision for manual backup for the activation of automatic systems. 357 (iv) Provisions for periodic inspec- tion of interior drainage systems and periodic operation of any mechanized portions for testing and training pur- poses. No more than one year shall elapse between either the inspections or the operations. (3) Other operation plans and crite- ria. Other operating plans and criteria may be required by FEMA to ensure that adequate protection is provided in specific situations. In such cases, sound emergency management prac- tice will be the standard upon which FEMA determinations will be based. (d) Maintenance plans and criteria. For levee systems to be recognized as providing protection from the base flood, the maintenance criteria must be as described herein. Levee syst'gs must be maintained in accord >°_tC.. with an officially adopted ma` :e- nance plan, and a copy of this plan must be provided to FEMA by the owner of the levee system when recog -, nition is being sought or when the plan for a previously recognized system is revised in any manner. All maintenance activities must be under the jurisdiction of a Federal or State agency, an agency created by Federal or State law, or an agency of a commu- nity participating in the NFIP that must assume ultimate responsibility for maintenance. This plan must docu- ment the formal procedure that en- sures that the stability, height, and __ overall integrity of the levee and its associated structures and systems are maintained. At a minimum, mainte- nance plans shall specify the mainte- nance activities to be performed, th frequency of their performance, the person by name or title respors. ble for their performance. (e) Certification requirements. Data submitted to support that a given levee system complies with the struc- tural requirements set forth in para- graphs (b)(1) through (7) of this sec- tion must be certified by a registered professional engineer. Also, certified as -built plans of the levee must be sub- mitted. Certifications are subject to, the definition given at 5 65.2 of this subchapter. In lieu of these structural requirements, a Federal agency with responsibility for levee design may cer- tify that the levee has been adequate- § 65.11 ly designed and constructed to provide protection against the base flood. (51 FR 30316, Aug. 25, 19861 9 65.11 Evaluation of sand dunes in map- ping coastal flood hazard areas. (a) General conditions. For purposes of the NFD?, FEMA will consider storm - induced dune erosion potential in its determination of coastal flood hazards and risk mapping efforts. The criterion to be used in the evaluation of dune erosion will apply to primary frontal dunes as defined in §59.1, but does not apply to artificially designed and constructed dunes that are not well - established with long- standing vegetative cover, such as the place- ment of sand materials in a dune -like formation. (b) Evaluation criterion. Primary frontal dunes will not be considered as effective barriers to base flood storm surges and associated wave action where the cross - sectional area of the primary frontal dune, as measured perpendicular to the shoreline and above the 100 -year stillwater flood ele- vation and seaward of the dune crest, is equal to, or less than, 540 square feet. (c) Exceptions. Exceptions to the evaluation criterion may be granted where it can be demonstrated through authoritative historical documentation that the primary frontal dunes at a specific site withstood previous base flood storm surges and associated wave action. (53 FR 16279, May 6, 1988] 9 65.12 Revision of flood insurance rate maps to reflect base flood elevations caused by proposed encroachments. (a) When a community proposes to permit encroachments upon the flood plain when a regulatory floodway has not been adopted or to permit en- croachments upon an adopted regula- tory floodway which will cause base flood elevation increases in excess of those permitted under paragraphs (c)(10) or (d)(3) of § 60.3 of this sub- chapter, the community shall apply to the Administrator for conditional ap- proval of such action prior to permit- ting the encroachments to occur and '358 44 CFR Ch. I (10-148 Edition) - shall submit the following as part of Its application: (1) A request for conditional approv- al of map change and the appropriate initial fee 8s specified by § 72.3 of this subchapter or a request for exemption from fees as specified by § 72.5 of this subchapter, whichever is appropriate; (2) An evaluation of alternatives which would not result in a base flood elevation increase above that permit- ted under paragraphs (c)(10) or (d)(3) of § 60.3 of this subchapter demon- strating why these alternatives are not feasible; (3) Documentation of individual legal notice to all impacted property owners within and outside of the com- munity, explaining the impact of the proposed action on their property. (4) Concurrence of the Chief Execu- tive Officer of any other communities impacted by the proposed actions; (5) Certification that no structures are located in areas which would be impacted by the increased base flood elevation; (6) A request for revision of base flood elevation determination accord- ing to the provisions of .§ 65.6 of this part; (7) A request for floodway revision in accordance with the provisions of § 65.7 of this part; (b) Upon receipt of the Administra- tor's conditional approval of map change and prior to approving the pro- posed encroachments, a community shall provide evidence to the Adminis- trator of the adoption of flood plain management ordinances incorporating the increased base flood elevations and /or revised floodway reflecting the post - project condition. (c) Upon completion of the proposed encroachments, a community shall provide as -built certifications in ac- cordance with the provisions of § 65.3 of this part. The Administrator will initiate a final map revision upon re- ceipt of such certifications in accord- ance with Part 67 of this subchapter. (53 FR 16279. May 6. 19881 9 65.13 List of communities submitting new technical data. This section provides a cumulative list of communities where modifica- Federal Emergency Management Agency .§:66.3 tions of the base flood elevation deter- minations have been made because of submission of new scientific or techni- cal data. Due to the need for expedit- ing the modifications, the revised map is already in effect and the appeal period commences on or about the ef- fective date of the modified map. An interim rule, followed by a final rule, will list the revised map effective date, local repository and the name and ad- dress of the Chief Executive Officer of the community. The map(s) is (are) ef- fective for both flood plain manage- ment and insurance purposes. (51 FR 30317, Aug. 25. 1986. Redesignated at 53 FR 16279, May 6, 19883 EDI2oa!AL NorE: For a list of communities Issued under this section and not carried in the CFR, see the List of CFR Sections Af- fected appearing in the Finding Aids section of this volume. PART 66- CONSULTATION WITH LOCAL OFFICIALS Sec. 66.1 Purpose of part. 66.2 Definitions. 66.3 Establishment of community case file and flood elevation study docket. 66.4 Appointment of consultation coordi- nation officer. 66.5 Responsibilities for consultation and coordination. AuiuoRIrv: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorga- nization Plan No. 3 of 1978; E.O. 12127. $ 66.1 Purpose of part. (a) The purpose of this part is to comply with section 206 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4107) by establishing proce- dures for flood elevation determina- tions of Zones A1-30, AE, AH, AO and V1-30, and VE within the community so that adequate consultation with the community officials shall be assured. (b) The procedures in this part shall apply when base flood elevations are to be determined or modified. (c) The Administrator or his dele- gate shall: (1) Specifically request that the community submit pertinent data con- cerning flood hazards, flooding experi- ence, plans to avoid potential hazards, estimate of historical and prospective economic impact on the community, 359 and such other appropriate data "(par - ticularly if such data will necessitate a modification of a base flood elevation). (2) Notify local officials of the progress of surveys, studies, investiga- tions, and of prospective findings, along with data and methods em- ployed in reaching such conclusions; and (3) Encourage local dissemination of surveys, studies, and investigations so that interested persons will have an opportunity to bring relevant data to the attention of the community and to the Administrator. (4) Carry out the responsibilities for consultation and coordination set forth in § 66.5 of this part. (41 FR 46988, Oct. 26, 1976. Redesignate' 44 FR 31177. May 31, 1979, and amend( 47 FR 771. Jan. 7, 1982: 48 FR 44553, S..,... 29. 1983; 49 FR 4751, Feb. 8, 1984; 50 FR 36028, Sept. 4, 1985] 9 66.2 Definitions. The definitions set forth In Part 59 of this subchapter are applicable to this part. (41 FR 46988, Oct. 26, 1976. Redesignated at 44 FR 31177, May 31. 19791 966.3 Establishment of community case file and flood elevation study docket. • (a) A file shall be established for each community at the time initial consideration Is given to studying that - community in order to establish whether or not it contains flood -prone areas. Thereafter, the file shall in- clude copies of all correspondence with officials In that community. l; the community is tentatively idenii';' fled, provided with base flood eleva- tions, or suspended and reinstated, documentation of such actions by the Administrator shall be placed in the community file. Even if a map is ad- ministratively rescinded or withdrawn after notice under Part 65 of this sub- chapter or the community successfully rebuts its flood -prone designation, the file will be maintained indefinitely. (b) A portion of the community file shall be designated a flood elevation study consultation docket and shall be established for each community at the time the contract is awarded for a flood elevation study. The docket shall MEMO at the apex on the fan 452 cfs plus debris load 590 cfs plus debris load (I think) TO: FEMA CORRESPONDENCE FILE, RIDGEMONT FILE, S R. AORMANN AND G. NELSON FROM: BRENDA SIM DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1991 SUBJECT: RIDGEMONT AND SUMMERFIELD AND FORKER DRAW FLOOD FLOWS On February 13 Ken Tupper and Chuck Simpson came in to discuss Ridgemont and Summerfield East. On Ridgemont Tammie told them what she had learned from the files, i.e. that the files are unclear as to whether the pond was designed to accommodate flow from all the proposed "upstream" developments or not. Tupper said he would have Dick Mason get back to us. We suggested that starting from scratch to determine the flows the pond needs to handle would probably be simplest since any new developments will have to meet the stormwater requirements in place when the development occurs. The original Ridgemont work was done before the guidelines were formalized. Tupper's objective is to re -work the stormwater pond to make it smaller and probably deeper. He wants to free up land for additional lots where the pond is currently. Tupper would like to begin work on Summerfield very soon. He wanted to know what he needed to do for the floodplain issue. I told him that we have heard rumors but have nothing in writing to state that all homes on alluvial fans will need flood insurance. If Tupper wants to remove all of Summerfield from the flood zone, he would need to design a stormwater facility to take a hundred year storm. He wanted to know what flow that is. I told him I would contact FEMA for that information. Tupper said he owns property north of Progress and east of Forker (upstream of Summerfield) that could be used for a stormwater facility or he could use the land under the power lines in Summerfield. On February 15 I called Alan Johnson at FEMA. I told him the information I needed and why I need it. He said the flood flows are: He said I should call Larry Basich to get the latest NFI regs re: alluvial fans. He thinks the regs came out in 1989. He referred to section 65.13. He said I should tell the developer that in designing the stormwater facility, he should design for debris load and to meet all the other special requirements for alluvial fans. I called Basich who was not in, but the person who answered said she would copy the regs and send them to me. I called Tupper's office and left word that I will send him the info. as soon as it comes in. OFFICE. OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON October 16, 1989 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Current Planning Administrator) //�� FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1r` SUBJ: Time Extension Request PE 1206 -78 re: Subdivisions We have reviewed the above referenced time extension request. We have no comments to make concerning the request. However you should note that since the approval of the preliminary subdivision Spokane County has adopted an Arterial Road Plan. The Plan identifies Forker Road as a Principal Arterial and Progress Road as a Minor Arterial. The subject Plat has frontage on both of these roadways. The applicant should be advised that the subject property is affected by a designated Flood Hazard Zone. The problems associated with the Flood Zone were identified in the Environmental Impact Statement for the plat. Finalization of future phases of the plat must address the Flood Zone and develop methods to mitigate the impacts of flooding. This may be done when drainage plans are prepared for the plat. # FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION * * * * * * * * * * * * # # # # * * * * * ** SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER N. 811 JEFFERSON ST. SPOKANE, WA 99260 -0180 FAX (509) 456-4715 TEL (509) 456 -3600 DATE: J -/ 9 -7 TIME: 3:/e P WI TO: `T rvA MnShe-42- DEPARTMENT: LakA o I fool FAX TELEPHONE: 451, . " .2,7_43 VOICE TELEPHONE: FROM: F�a6 \M P -^J''' COMMENTS: PAGE L OF Z DEPARTMENT: co u a-t [.=:Aic i >J e 25 f Thank you. tw Enclosure c: Ken Tupper SPO +HNC COUNTY COURT HOUSE TO: Spokane County County Engineer Spokane County Utilities Spokane County Health District pokane County Department of Building & Safety ire Protection District #1 ater Purveyor: Trentwood Irrigation District #3 FR omas G. Mosher, AICP, Senior Planner DATE: October 9, 1989 SUBJECT: Extension of Time for Summerfield East PE- 1206 -78 y5(o — Zz1-F3 tL C,D MAN2Nr7h7 CAD 7s f ri.fl ' MEMORANDUM PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached request for an Extension of Time to finalize the plat of Summerfield East, PE- 1206 -78. If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should be made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to us by October 24, 1989 . 04733 SGONANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE Ms. Betty Strawn E 14908 Olympic Spokane, Washington 99216 Dear Ms. Strawn: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 August 8, 1989 Recently you asked us about the flood zone in the Summerfield East area and requested that we respond in writing. In reviewing our files we find that when the first phase of Summerfield East was being considered, the developer's engineer (Inland Pacific Engineering) looked at the potential for flooding in the area and recommended a berm be constructed around the plat to provide protection. We understand that the berm was constructed. As I have mentioned to you before, the "unnumbered A Zone" designation on the flood maps is a very approximate delineation of a possible flood zone. Through the preliminary platting process (which in the case of Summerfield East occurred several years ago), the potential for flooding was evaluated and a specific solution (the berm) was used. It is my understanding that as the future phases of Summerfield develop to the north and closer to the source of the flooding (Porker draw), other stormwater facilities, such as ponds, may also be constructed to provide additional protection. I wish my answer to your questions could be more specific, but by nature the "unnumbered A zones" are not specific and detailed. They are based on approximations, not on detailed engineering studies. Handling development proposals for and questions about these zones are probably the most difficult parts of my work administering the County's flood zone regulations. I hope our response has helped you. Sincerely, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. County Engineer Brenda Sims Drainage Planning Coordinator Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 re Pr trINti .. .ttAoTTP:SPC;I: rNif■ is .M ."..• Ales • Inter-office Communication Subject / e - Form 327-C.R. n — To P A -74 - From C.( 2 ' rt.-cad • -; . • • 7.; E. 0 1• Ahr .117•7f;i7 lit :7 47:: " r • * 1. ; . 7 . • •• OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date 9 t41 , /9 • ( e vvo - 7 1- J e se —fee s kyNe--v• C r x • ) e d h e E c P En? A7 13(0 r,4 8 ,7r sood a-ce--° t, &!. --v 3 t li , :i' 4 7,i..,..-i ,•'..,,.: P..}..:' t,j7,::;:Yii i .A;ti- . :: '' .; 7 - ' ; ,; • '‘ 7 : Yi: '.7;., , 41 '.. . . .." "?' '.. . . 4 '..c r tf.1 'i . .......1- . ; ; .. : :: r .....-.',...," 4 .. 3 • ,..... . .?...':.%.. 4;; 'till ... ' ■ .. - ....,:.."^ '.'''''' File No: Name: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR FINDINGS OF FACT PE- 1206 -78 & ZE 202 -78 SUMMERFIELD EAST EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST 1. That the preliminary plat was originally approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee in a public hearing on January 30, 1979. 2. That the zoning upon finalization of the phases of this plat has been reclassified from Agricultural to R -1, crossing over to UR 3.5 zoning within the near future. 3. That the Comprehensive Plan is designated as URBAN and is within the PSSA area. 4. That since the original approval, the applicant has completed three phases of Summerfield East, known as Summerfield East, Summerfield East 1st and Summerfield East 2nd Additions, all recorded final plats totaling 100 lots with 166 lots still remaining to be finalized. A fourth phase known as Summerfield East 3rd Addition has been submitted for County review and depending on market conditions, is ready for finalization which includes 34 lots. 5. That no additional conditions have been recommended by County Engineers, Utilities, Health District and Building & Safety Departments. 6. Public notice was given as required by the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and no comments were received from the public. DECISION Based on the foregoing findings, the Subdivision Administrator APPROVES an Extension of Time for three (3) years to October 1, 1989, subject to the conditions based upon Extension of Time guidelines Chapter 3, Section "G ", Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. The conditions of approval shall remain the same as those that have already been attach to the preliminary plat of record. DSU LAS S. ADAMS Subdivision Administrator SPOKANE COUNT. COURT HOUSE e Gary Kenualy 3 COPIES Engineer's Office INTEROFFICE PIAU 1 s PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING N. 811 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 -2274 SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99201 February 1, 1980 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Wally Hubbard, Plat Administrator �o SUBJECT: Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of January 29, 1980 Gentlemen: On January 29, 1980, the Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee met at 9:00 A.M. to consider four Extensions of Time and five Preliminary Plats. Following are the applications in sequence and the action taken by the Committee. If not'appealed, these decisions are final 10 days after Findings and Order have been signed by the Hearing Examiner committee which was January 31, 1980. Hearing Examiner Committee Board members were: Eldon Thomas - Chairman, John Culler, Ted McCoury. Kathleen Carstens sat in for Ted McCoury at the continuation Hearing on January 31, 1980. 1. PN- 1056C -76, Peone Pines Estates 2nd Addition - Devinco, Inc.- Time Extension ZN- 135A -76, Agricultural to R -I Location: East of Newport Highway and Burlington Northern Railroad r/w and approximately 1 mile north of Mead along Mt.Spokane Drive. Proposal: 49.24 acres into 112 lots for single family dwellings Action: Approval - Unanimous Additional Condition: - That all roads within the plat be paved and curbed as well as sidewalks provided as called for by the Spokane County E ngineering Department. 2. (PE- 1206 -78, Summerfield East - Main - Time Extension ZE- 202 -78, Agricultural to R -I Locatio In the Spokane Valley adjacent to and north of Wellesley Avenue, west of Progress Road, south of Forker Road and east of Bannen Road Proposal: 91 acres into 266 lots for single family dwellings Action: Approval - Unanimous 3. PN- 1270 -78, Shady Slope Addition - Ilarrance - -Time Extension Location: In the SW corner of the Intersection of Shady Slope Road and the Newport Highway Proposal: Approximately 1 acre into 3 lots Action: Approval - Unanimous i - Transamerica Title Insurance Services 17 Transamerica Title Insurance Compan, North 720 Argonne Road Spokane, Washington 99206 (509) 922-2222 ECEIVED JUL 2 7 1979 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Gentlemen: CERTIFICATE TO PLAT ( Spokane County Planning Commission N. 721 Jefferson 6 Spokane, Washington s RECEIV COON 1\U G0 11g79 Order No.:97855 M Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat of SUMMERFIELD EAST ADDITION In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of Spokane County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in Spokane County, to -wit: A parcel of land in the South half of Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 E.W.M., being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the South quarter corner of Section 35; thence South 89 ° 52'00" West along the South line of the Southwest quarter of said Section and centerline of Wellesley Avenue as it now exists 60 feet in width a distance of 661.05 feet; thence North 00 °05'38" West, a distance of 30.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue and True Point of Beginning of this description; thence North 00 ° 05'38" West along the East boundary of PLAT NO. 4 OF WEST FARMS IRRIGATED TRACTS, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 51, a distance of 1121.63 feet; thence North 62 °23'41" East, a distance of 192.97 feet; thence North 40 ° 31'59" East, a distance of 48.01 feet; thence North 65 ° 56'49" East, a distance of 128.00 feet; thence South 46 ° 13'24" East, a distance of 114.31 feet; thence East a distance of 469.10 feet; thence North 79 ° 35'56" East, a distance of 133.39 feet; thence South 56 ° 39'30" East, a distance of 63.63 feet,; thence North 74 ° 28'06" East, a distance of 128.00 feet; thence South 13 ° 55'30" East, a distance of 75.19 feet; thence South 89 ° 56'40" East, a distance of 36.43 feet; thence South 00 °03'20" West, a distance of 123.00 feet; thence South 36 ° 02'26" East, a distance of 54.45 feet; thence South 00 ° 03'20" West, a distance of 123.00 feet; thence South 89 ° 56'40" East, a distance of 375.09 feet; thence South 00 °25'19" West, a distance of 560.01 feet; thence North 89 ° 56'40" West, a distance of 342.67 feet; thence South 00 ° 03'20" West, a distance of 133.00 feet; thence South 06 ° 17'44" West, a distance of 44.26 feet; thence South 00 ° 03'20" West, a distance (continued) of 143.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue, as it now exists 60 feet in width; thence North 89 ° 56'40" West along said Northerly margin a distance of 274.98 feet; thence North a distance of 903.42 feet; thence —West a distance of 700.00 feet; thence South a distance of 00 90) feet to said Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue; thence South 89 °52'00" West along said Northerly margin a distance of 311.10 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. VESTED IN: OLD_NAT.IONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, a national banking association, as under agreement with Faye . E11io t dated September 28, 1972 and MERCEDES JESKE, a marriU woman, as her sole and separate property. EXCEPTIONS: (continued) 1. General taxes for the year 1979 delinquent in the amount of $596.97 including Weed District Tax, plus interest. (Parcel No. 35643 -9017) Covering this and other property. General taxes for the year 1979 delinquent in the amount of $559.67 including Weed District Tax, plus interest. (Parcel No. 35644 -9024) Covering this and other property. Page 2 Order No. 97855 -M 2. Assessments for the year 1979 delinquent in the amount to Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3, plus interest, Treasurer's fee for delinquent assessments.(Parcel No. Assessments for the year 1979 delinquent in the amount to Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3, plus interest, Treasurer's fee for delinquent assessments. (Parcel No. of $198.00 plus 35643 -9017) of $186.00 plus 35644 -9024) 3. Liability to future assessments by Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3. 4. Reservation of mineral rights by Northern Pacific Railway in Deed dated September 1, 1883 and recorded October 20, 1886 as Document No. 946, as follows: Reserving and excepting from said lands such as are now known or shall hereafter be ascertained to contain coal or iron, and also the use of such surface ground as may be necessary for mining operations; and the right of access to such reserved and excepted coal and iron lands for the purpose of exploring, developing and working the same. 5. Ri ho make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described, as granted by Deed recorded as Document No. 432623. 6. Easements over and across said property for constructing and maintaining telephone and electric power lines disclosed by Document No. 324569. 7. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantee: Purpose: Dated: a Recorded: Recording No.: 8. CONTRACT OF SALE Seller: cc: IPEC Purchaser: Dated: Recorded: Recording No.: By: Page 3 Order No. 97855 -M Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3. Underground pipeline of the district for the transportation and delivery of water, of a size not to exceed 12 inches in diameter January 12, 1966 January 17, 1966 171591C AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Old National Bank of Washington, a national banking association; as Trustee under agreement with Faye S. Elliott dated September 28, 1972, and Mercedes Jeske, a married woman as her sole and separate property The W. Main Corpor_ ation, a Washington corporation, as to an undivided 50% interest, and T.D.C._,ac.. a Washington corporation, as to an undivided 50% interest April 2, 1979 April 6, 1979 7904060363 Records examined to July 20, 1979 at 8:00 A.M. TRANSAMERIICCA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 7 / / Jtt J Pam Bahr �M.Y..I.... _ s <l17 w ' .�'i ` r ,1 ". bL . •bt•fet.1 • a awe' gig YW1� .. w/t ` SI Ibsl b COMM an �A . =gad* St*r pawn mho es w rb (ape r 001)••• f!W� V al Gila. w• r• b Oaf••• �•!♦ba.a mails is N Y spas• Age bed 113 Onto OF Cabs SW app M• r• PM • b r tam /?tale fa•I awn flat? GGmMIVF. V Sari/ .b 14100111•• Oki • •• •.Im.• r Omar• DSr b• r y b aid ►A /b an P••.4041.111•• b C`�J� ♦ e+. A• • b_p• •1 ti / AT l% tt/ • • • g do - a -e'rlr F O//d - • bdA• .-21,97-/r6 /iiiG rz rl I . ▪ n /71 ., ✓ ( `aaltk P W b Wp 0 {.� tr W A 1 16 a p• sr saw and anti r r laaa be d • b pmo 4 awls PP rear aT� / wS a1 e• •1 e•4 b b W pllr bit F• • •••• Olga r b PI b• i• ma i. as pawn .+ - •••••••• b ilia to rlspl.Y\ • Wand OP PPS r waive !•F IS r r1• . ..b • b r.l • il Is is b Ord Wldoi. dea • b'SIM•• amyl • W sate 1P. dip a r ad m a 4 Ns a pi S.D. r m •• m• a`• bb Or a •• a pr r W Y a m . d Om a I••.•I . N a•amid. • ilia b *peg Sae *pps in b .Y p• • b e-y d a s dopo• r b p•• r•. r• Ca r r a W- • Is mot p• SIP s r• r r moa • r a•• I. b •1•11.1. ri• r el► I.• mi k ••■• W r •r . SS r 1. 1 1• IS b b_ bra ••• Was* 11.0 .r PM • an r ^r • W r.r -. ✓b •• •r b OW p• b pal 1 • b ad I..• said •• •••• •mil •. •p anise air p al apa to ••• tisane= '• • Is r b mot•. *ad mama r W- r b al p.:r ▪ r. TS 'A s • Pair p •• •a..• T 4 RPM* b W br ?lags sawn wow*** wn 1• .. �a .• •• rl Pals a awn pa ti •• a a.m. .b i d Wb s Imam +b al errs•- .1 l isle ea, QY • IvrSO*, - b M1 pan • b r r s• paa r••.• • b PI pia• .Y ■. ••r r.••S •mol• b ••Im YeOlOrr•• 4 avail awl Mail s /.� <fln " ' • w- - il aid p•4••r- OlM•®b•Y p• r b sot 0•.a' r..••.II:r V. r d r damp Ow - IN •a••r r•• Y•rV. .�. b SUP dawn �• OS wnOd alma. P. es • •t e osin Y On r aw let b r P•• 4. Min 01 •a is p... Waal ••• a w ra•`awnr r.rma m •m mon aph •gi=I .0.l . ra mo. t•Irr.abp-Payy MI 4p - L_ Yrr wen. r r•g•.ab• - 1 pr l r Si Ala r. •r1 • b Cm* r J/4 tTfT w 'r • r ]LVI! /r • 4 // 4)} ( V_ swab. 410 Oda Ira �}, ,7<Rt••.n end/ {9M) r. wag m awe, dada, Ina •••• bi •••• • br taw Im nob •a r mob ma r• • a r •• 4••11 pia. rIm M ••r W S b• a W b• we Y r ••- a • a• Y.r ear a d .a P... •. ••1. O Y- ••mOY -r ••• pqr bar paw Y•• Pohl r w a a.. ••••••• •O ailed Stamina SIMON* I••••. a.W b m. Y • Yaps- we ••• • mass. a r1 awn. Plrpl •••• ..a••• ••I• m •r Car pain rr •• r r • r •a • mama u• sire r. lea a• r b a r b y r r Oat 4 r y- pat •• r •• r ma, main al r •• - a ••••••• anal pawn •f► * r►P•Y:IOS. pawn bT • wpm* _4•.l wag r ra • • la ••••••••mo•a• -- AMMO aW _a pl•r r b p 4 r a- r a •• •a • s- ••• ••••• a r r apt• r rams r • as lisp. • • paws •P..at Ass- •gw. rr rra.•ImOrb`•r RAN brr_ l.si r • ma • m moan a.•.m. - - ... •bmor - r•re�•o r moYa_ - r wn•ml: r w r.�. rr a. •• "� bOatpi• mti solo a• Ont. Wpm r a P• ba a•• N r aalr sees. �.• w •a a -!� r•b r ••• PIS Oan m laaa l Pr W ••••■ P�..l rb wn.r sit n • r •a • I• Pm • apY.0.0•- 6- p•yrra.l pi. 'AA IYa 4Y 1 ••m.a - aMY.prr a 1��•eW net r• r aid pa . r- .•easy•' - ••? MO A • b a P b'{•M IP OS . '.r-/• bin af•Pr•r•r pm-lawn..itpawn• •t •mImml lbQ•mobt• T• •r.arp •p•WlaAl1•u•r p•O•V•O•mp ■•••••• Oa Vr r •a1••1•% r Ties bb Qum btaaecta b5Sa•awr bwop a• r r•sum •fare Wa•s •a. aid n• ---- - - - -- -- • . b.. asralnir „' •• ', Oda =•aw boa pan• _ CMS OF •OF MO. OTT A '. a m Ts.' • - r • eW.L Oa • Y ••• ml • 4a bd ail Ya-wl a ••• r par• err OE We I r - again.. r• r• _ - at e • b 2 a y7 /tiu - Car. • r aiaa tar tars y +b aim r•'lama • rr a alai. b M r b Y -brt •r ••• - M r M •w nil d Im- O• Tr - al Ga••t i • bal ~loft a=110•1 •p sari de • a1-a1 r b moat. is b-- r sera r b ilea Oay 4 at . ". J O _ " ' b al or a. ea b. b a. or A ' a 4 1 at r ma m•m+b1b0,110.1•.mo•.r a wn r.4al • as - Voila W lip**. PO Ol .• PI Cap* rmol b •••• Bea r. ..• -bwn.r- •m moat .. .. .. . O as lsd SF •••• •• •M •l C/ (i Filed lid /��' �10�1�Y el rcf,�a. Request oi tic.a.a.. Ze 6_ ' s -. -.. • aba Aa• A O/ rn IL/ Y p- •ate.? Ism !m a• of al b r••1 V 41•1• m. • r Ya •r ••• p. b b r paw a a••/4 L ea! f ! d '/ dirk et RAM OP' b .TS! •O COVI - fT o NSW flat.l 1 / •••seal r• an i�1.6LY-fit-- .a• r__- 11L »:¢:t':_ -.. . _ . taw r pai arm fla -: _(•.a.l11.._ . r. W 1 r lea Tel •l • r •• laalr r Tr lwnr m r Ta cape. r • Ow r IL I .- ...aim at del a a awn !ma l SO .wr• r PS" .rl ara •■ Sin M r•4 •• s .a be Is to ■ prawn [maim; a b •1 awn sin •••• bra as alma a a •• a• • ••• 1••• ••••• •••r Y a kam r b r 4 tier •s Gaon. - Z• to apt a• al air •? r• ••••a w b el/ IT • (.i&l a r r.r•.r•brlY rT• Shia elm .m•n •• rml r• al Us /wane am a T.= Cara as a a Gaga war, b- al a ...air*. Y a• a•rT awn amoa • Ian •sawn. l m lama r • hal •••• a ail •a • a 4 s r C1l 4 La la a d • • al an •• smarm • ESC bores4 1. bat •t al. A Span n aabO.rC •Mar Oapq pad ter 161911 11 A t. 6r Spare tla ]sad •tor O. 4 a 141.r O. adtter. I. t. nasal. Opq• woad 4Sta It 1911 ST T. ■• q•• ta 2A[L - Yeast - err- i1® stir• asr Ob l9a ar •t Spy. 1921 Nan flit r tat. nne 1. Inaba. ad ralr 0. ..Dram. to ab.m. bade le• l.ra 0th .W. a Wprwtot oad laesb L• War • Pas Ogy. • wrp • parka K a. not part, 4.8.. ad . Pala ar Ora •1.r is n, • wrp.rat/a. egstrd la Ia K 0a Oats •f 14 •1nta4 8.ras La prl•dpal pbe K •41r.• at Spsba4, ••hat*.•. parr r She anal part, s *.aal r at taa portba 0f t8. to a. part for ad ssab e st •f to Oat/ too h red 0 ay [bas *. ad I4 pa (92r/3.15) blbn 4 to 9 bad 41d y b sla pet r \b seed pert, t• toy/ a •ref 14 any •dal btpd. O .. am R•wa.. arts. alm 411, .a alma .n• the ads p , of a ert, 2. bad p one 4 14 14 wawa • tea a alga Mar, , 184 • atrt•ha strips or push d St ad .aa lag and lea In ab reap al Sp•lve. 4444 K tsabotton. •ail partloary Beata r folLn. t.aOi.• • - l step of land fay ( feat In width boa tasty (20 toot is sae •. 44 •tS •t the meter Its •t I of the •pk to elb7 laud •bar Orgy as the •• to .ere•44 and Leta that: 4 M once• iota nil 4 4 ( 4 they (p) tab laltda of lens boa as TfsM• r •n'e'ib. oar and ••••• its tbbr ens (32) 4 thlrp Mme (37) 141414 la ■ald*i IM 401%1. 4 botnis la• 1a irate, ••to Sorsdo Ls Aso sae, ed said Iledase tat alas 4 l.eb a• tan Tat., 414 • pet of to mama slelt• (11 1) K the so the as .after 011 )e \b r want sar4• a 1) of 24 • m1bwt year (42 ) tm 4• eatlait s4rt•r (dg ) w the Briber smarter (Or ) •t males thirty nw (33) la TnahO twee *a (26) bra bat fart/ fbar (44) E• •. ■. maid eater 12n K said aaml. 414 enrb,a a trla4. 4 +B' ■ Sa1ra15s 0 • 414 a Os wt lb* K 1es aortees% tai (e 1) r lb rw8.wa 4414.4 (Eh 4) r •■10 salon *ETV flre (5) 039 tat SD tab M m ro r b rthat rr of rid vorthart year (a 1) of pah a% .after (at 1) theta nen 93' s• at 145 at) thane as 33' 05t at 45 at; bn•0 tort 97 11• ear 710 bow; awe er*• B4' boa eat u91 raw; theta nab • 06 • .sl 235 net; an= wawa Op 97 at 146 ran; 4904 wart 7)03 at 77 tat; theme .see 57 a ear 129 tell; thews meth 07 45• at 70 het; tins nr4 OS t7 vast 113 feat; ass rt a or 54 est 101 tan; ahem soar r 9• tow 312 fat; aroo north er,15 eft 127 fat; tattoo Gore 07 4' art 192 Me. nut try a lam oestaintrE throe (5) tows, •1.• • •*ry of lam !baby (50) tar in .lath boy !lane (13) at to ate an wt 004 of the t•lls.14 Mer14d Own laa 1• -.St- Pot alto on b dab tat of the ••4 sale a al at • p•ta nr44e (13) Cots Mt of t4 ant tin 14 at lam of ••14 lot tamp ant (27) K verbs La Aa bets. if 4[44.0 wanton, .1111 .*rns said is salt ateoo seat pedal 4 ..al ?wt.•n (15) root at of acid wet 114 K •..td lw tear sate ( 4 the eat ld eat rwn llab of ea wWeo taffy fin; now wet .r ate 45 tat, art •r 14• 1. the wet 114 .r lb wt we half (1f2) of the at o4 hell (1`1) of b *.•resat smarter (1) at ad ••1,n tat/ fps• (A). Canso sad !atilt ••• .b. 14 •M4 .1..1.11.44 •d rent •f ay Gored le testes 1• lento s65s.ba .m eb • pt of t11s •44• Par wed the paw* 0f eatrai4. errata and a /41.8.14 U twat 4! 14• pad of the pre "mot. 001 W ••••• two lava• fn lrrlplles 44 sari. a 1 labr_na4 ' bar •14 sus 4j14s or •14trt• pee Haas the pay of 14 oad part a flea ay or masts in let talosa; availed that to parr of the nod pert stall, •1 1t. .fame. am root, mtotran we alto!• are• (rides 1..t ••14 wyv wo t1. 1. (2) ar .4G Witten 4 e 1. •t ea pries betas lee -JLl lis di44 Lao am the aunty Raw on 112 at a tad bolo. 4l! 4144 the point •f mat el or en 4t tbay Spa (32) a amll4 Lot Addition to tad• L4 day Trona. eal tha •m •t ab net L ]wt hire/ (30) 22 Nra lee As area( Pala fain that t8. pantos •f a• flat part all bow the att. at Bolo an 4.t and onto P• o w t awrhrt u. •1441. ter he rlan p ether bane, or roar° et sal otter pts •rest shy 4411 n•• fat, preload the\ sae 410E4 or aes•yvg• .hall be r flans w not 4 104e. saw 441 or the flw K 424 \beau: d prat d fetal that 14 p'Zll.s of the rant pt shall bra 14 right to •r... tt right K tor . Sr • 1.4n1 eta Rasta* 402 bolas Lett twny own (27) 41 weer .0461(47) 4 boar too •a ante., 12 414 Sr.t e4 that ova r Sell hil eye the pinion 44 t8., 414 rl(M of q awn 1es war L 4 l4 aped t tab • pyre. tt pay of the team pt rartter tan at the atlas of tie flnt part 4411 8.w aao rat to ass 14 ••a•1 1.44.1 •m 10465 •f q a ab patty K ab arm pal with .r pi p s l so dirt., sr tla., for to spar •t 44 014 aloe at .aa pate. so a Berta pert we gt.nSO •m 192 the part/ of to fad pert .011. *4 Its 1.a el 1.d .too•. ewe*rvw .m stab .11 .•ail arossas •lair by f11® r can paha sr pipoo w shall • sentry b watt an on at olds K ••to 1139 of nil 44 arta t*. ••• .Geed• the 4111a rem real a raw a sees 4123 the altrb• •d n la •r pipe list 1 the Foggy K b fat part on the ether tr w as to am/ the 4dr athe,t wtertol t.arry.S..• 112 7410 *1 ts sod parte tea• to St.nts t Mad e a...ta at all 4 pat as a 194 w t8. ea 41114 attain* 4 *.a•4 m an 4 *!•meld• pnloaa, ta\b.r ha1.r, 18.4 to as t6• party K the sad part, t4 44••••• or rs14to, still .t ony to s41o424 *•Y rWa65 or q lbr Of pupae •d as fn alt b as 1s . halt ■road. lt40 the .s1d right K ty Male rated .411 neat 4 thr 74r14n of tits first p414• tar blrs. ad rslgis• MVP we pa TO unto T .� 1 all and ottvY .4 r tO •4.a t n214s •n2 0•0010•001204 ser•4 Inmates ref 1d the sofa unto 1 e eb 741577 of 14 wean part, a..1 4 I4 wasrre d4 40E4. faor. the ban, • part, and tb uL 4144 MS In tt pt1*\ . Owe tartar.. tbla4tn4n. •al mlgm, weaver aM . to s wallet the �pa*a ab psswdw 4 add parr r the seal 1W. 14 w • • s o.. peas of 44 abet part. .m tar 414. a .awn, 4 rata 112 •a, 58411 404 will cane and 4sry person eoatar, lava •S•Ina, or 11 nitg1S flat" 584 the ••14 brand y thee retest* forever Ara be belay, 7. first part baba br 7 10.. et bray so44 flee tm and els el td B red!!, l oanl• Ls '.M 00 •1 14 0 am the raid Bea bra has Sd corporate . n a. to bras. .a.rlled y 11• •t, and M bow bred( avow 14 area r 1tWe• • Rufmel, e • ter, the q am rear tat \260.4, bad and 0411ete lltms. f gallant. R R. lie a ptgen .f.- Spat R. Galbraith T. A. Dun 12 lea l Owe° 47 O ea 4 ars R. rAraatb - Re dater. mats[:- . Sad- land E. Sd- rat•ry• Dais L• star • 121.4 OSp.y 4 Oar R. (41brdth. _ aeon °r•a *tary weard C. s al- Oa4ry• pots or la*htng4e. ) revers R .!pol•• ) Ss. et 1t/. 1911. *artier tif) tat 1 .v t[ 1. 1 91b • d r 4f Yy all. In •nn ray said County .M •tat•. do bomb? ramie t• hID tt l. and 444 R. p.r.owly mmelee entity e• br..14 E. Sad. dose lad • In .m .4o *mead tea . ^•arorl t4 4v s tit they l ied an.lt the .v .t eta rM .m albetr7 •n 1111i 1111i dm, for the 4•. �aa that ib l In . an Spar •rrEI r o r tM • 4 of natal nip tba 1 Rh ' pntaa tbnln rvatenw• Bate of !ambivalen ) rimy at ge4c. ) at c On 44 194 a or la. . 1911 srenib .4.44.4 before no tray R. aal4deb, .d - ar C. bttt a a M le the ••••ldw d r nt and r t[• poml• la. Lanl Ooasy. 1.a C. far• m atoll 4 ta [b ay within n r 4• 1 Vl instneet. •M ••kewl•lnd t4 ••L Inane" *•b• t4 el s 4 'o antes it and 'f the safe wawa: ter the maw •m purpose •area •,dome. 11 51111518 that b . ..48 ,..., to •1.414• bra nu iartw w. roar tire .Sae rIIt esn brrl4• on 4 tam w4 •.'ny4 q of•S H•1 Ml tt4 4 • •m • *. MOUSY 4,. atl; rrr •a Ms of rwhlagt4n, ) taey .f wows. ) B4 Oft USA l a a at Ray. 1911 mama eared been n• earl. a. 'annuli, we 4 E.� lawn R,1 to w lan to b• e.4•n4 •m sr•terr K et boas Lae 144 • Aar ad des 1 4 era . the 23.9 .D wee t4 rlthin el retgelg tatasnt. *w •.km• tie hot •M • voluntary m yew tary act a of ..ld rerpratlon. ref th• 44 d 41 .m . prtto• ttew• 44[24.54, and to web .444 *4.1 bg at authorised 4 4444 • 1d I4wr4.es• year aft w® er ®IatB 1 bow beta.• et y ham sod affixed y ert•• 441 us lag we •• brae IVTAIY Par T. A. 1.t4 artery 1 le •M for tba w.4 of tat44n, Midi l at ltok.m• 7. 1. [has leery Palle In •ad for tits stew or last Lyten. '5.1414 at !Bola. tea. T. 2. !t/4 rtes ren. final ror t. Waft e t44h1y124 4•1d14 a apb.4. 4446. 1 1 feat T. afro[ erg 5sw A,. $ r6L jZ— i.'.;ry a +1°1894) r ,, DEED and in coolJefation of the benefits to be derived by the ,rumor prop said Id Pipeline, the undersigned IALTGR A. ANDERSON, a single eta, -.:ocs i :,:rebc convey unto 1T, r;TI:P'.0 IRPICATEON DISTRICT K. 3 nn in-i• at t-o district o:` l:e ';rt : :o . Sty t of 'Washington, its successors and assigns, on the following described land situated In Spokane Oo:; , n Coe z ")'i� ::,t c o - 'a;' s a ;sec :c to on s .: construct, reeensnvct, operate and maintain pipeline r. . hi pp m non, so hereinafter provided, to -wit; 1 "•' and appurtenances, as A strip of land, being that onion of BONNIE LEA ACP: Tr+, • area in thy South half of sect" ian i S, Township 20 , North, R 44 F . W .5I.. according to the plat thereof recorded in the office of the Spokane County Auditor, lying on either side of the center line as here jbea and included between two lines parallel to the center line, I s at describel lines each lying ten feet distant measured at right angles to the following• rallel described center line: Beginning at the south quarter corner of Section 35, Township 20 North, °an ?e 44 E.t:,9.; thence South F9' S0_i /" !Vest 661.05 feet; thence North 0'10 -112' West 1760,3 feet; thence Forth 59';0_1/ • Fast 15 feet to a point which is true point of becinninv; thence cant inuinr ` :omit $9'50 -1 /2' Bast 645,4 feet, nor° or less, to a noint 07. the nom:- snnth, center line or said Section 33; thence South 99'50 -1/2' Gast 1:.7.4 feet, more or less, to a point on the west right -of -way line of Progress Road, Upon said strip or land the grantee district, its successors and assigns. the Perpetual right and privilege of constructing reconstructing, shall hair. and naint aiain;, an underground nirel ine efti's _ operating, is o n repairing nd delivery watt,- att - c;cs i : or tt__t :,vat o: tc[ior. _p od of a sire not exceeding : i::c:: s in didleter. In the exercise o.` this ensc:aent the grantee district Lr n -Si fences to tl:c cats el, nabl la: ::wee or. cry - s op' extent reasoned y possible and shell pay reasonable value for • crops aetuni actually' destroyed or Jsca; ed in tae exorcise ci this r. :acs :e ��', or davged snail he rrrIaced, if' parties V tow. the Arodnt '+ rre i vie cox hie tr pt tion< •. to the hmpaa of da::ages to Le paid, the sane shall be resolved : t r tor. . napes one arbiter, those t;.0 orbiters nn -e a t':':J "tardy arbiters party named shall reach a determination by majority a rt ,.m. et retin pan shbl t bes J )' vote, whir,: sail .etcrr..in:K tan shall be accepted by the p.viSes. The provisions of this instrument shall be bindi: :. upon any lessee or tenant of the premises of c'r.icb the strip of lend herein described is a part. The payment of crop damages IT the grantee to the tenant or lessee shall constitute ;.crfotnance of the grantee's ubliration to pay crop damages hereunder, an,: t:.c divisior, of said payment for crop Jamnles shall he a matter to be handled between the grantor as landlord and his tenant or lessee. In the making of any excavation in the exercise of this enscr.ent the rrnntee district stall restore the surface of the ground to the condition it was in 7cavat ion, as nearly as reasonably possible, 'tier to the The undersigned Grantor agrees to construct 00 ;o rrarert i::,^.rnveucnts, except fences on said strip o land herein described. Subject only to the grant herein made, the possession and use of said strip of land shall remain in the grantor, his heirs, legal representatives and assigns. The undersigned warred t_' that he is the owner o` the premises or which Cm strip or land herein describe: is s part, and that he is eutl.urieed to execute this Instrument. The right -of -way and ease.+cnt herein convoyed shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs, successors, legal representatives and assigns, alb ) Ss. 11159: c. .. ,� u1TNEF,S the hand and seal of the unCcrsieced rraa2or , Cris (� 4 a of 0ee,.L , ; r, ia.a�.y '966. L • .� , (Sea (.�...e— air _ d s fo4 4 ' the unLersiu:c: :, n :2z : :r,. :'ublia I ^•-' •y, Jo hereby certify t at on this ,2 E. day of So.eeber, tV i +...y / •LL personally appeared before me WALTER A. ANDE.RSCEasingle man, to me known to ' be the individual described In and who executed the within lostnracnt, and acknowledged that he styled and sealed the sane as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, CIv1E under my hand and official seal the clay an d e. t aipSe written. 2 li' N• .,r .. ¢' te114v,. ?.- ...r...w.nea.,..0c7r. _ .. - ; .- ::sr..... - ....w .-.. 0 ® 0 - — m COO tiC) n its t ` ' d5 r v / 9. I� 6y e / >I / / ( 1 / / 95G n • TO: Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Director Planning Department orrlu.s ur FROM: Gary Kennaly, Planning & Traffic Division Enginee ( `yU l Spokane County Engineer's Office SUBJECT: Draft EIS Review of Summerfield East it ti A:* D.11.1u1N.+Nc iFi `111 " t nvrrine- COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER S 1'4 ) ,«:A- 111 xo'ros 119:Z01 December 5, 1978 We have completed our review and analysis of the Draft EIS and offer the following comments for your consideration. Section 4. Transportation /Circulation 1. Trent Avenue should be identified as SR 290 because it is a State Highway and is under the jurisdiction of the State Department of Transportation -- not the County Road Department. 2. In addition to the arterials mentioned in the Draft, Forker Road and Progress Road are designated arterials, adjacent to and pro- viding direct access to the proposed development but not mentioned in thia portion of the Draft. 3. Due to operational and geometric characteristice of Forker Road, additional right of way dedication and construction of left turn facilities may be required to mitigate possible traffic safety hazards from traffic entering this proposed development from Forker Road. 4. Same statement as #3 only referring to Progress Road. 5. Same statement as #3 only referring to Wellesley Road. 6. No mention as to impacts or provisions for pedestrian and /or biker facilities on roads proposed in the plat. Sidewalks on neigh- borhood collector arterials are required and will partially address pedestrian facilities. To date the neighborhood collector arterials contained in this plat pr)posal have not been designated. Page 2 Fred Dayhareh Draft EIS Review of Summerfield East 7. Pedestrian and /or biker facilities were not addressed for existing arterials of Forker Road, Progreso Road and Wellesley Avenue which are all adjacent to the proposed development and which does pro- vide access to students traveling to the elementary, junior and high schools in the immediate vicinity of the proposal. TO: FROM: SUBJECT: OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER Spokane County, Washington Fred Davhar h. tor of Planning D Draft Environments act Statement Summerfield East Date Dec. 5, 1978 The following comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement for Summerfield East are submitted by the Utilities Department for your review. Additional information on Transportation /Circulation and Water will be submitted separately. Water: Two different estimates are included in the draft EIS as to the peak summer time flow on water consumption. On pages 34 and Viii appear "2,000 gallons per lot" and /or "532,000 gallons per day ", but on pages 26 and 61 these figures are "2,500 gallons per lot" and /or "665,000 gallons per day ". Both seem high for consumption per lot based on 3.5 persons and small lot sizes (10,000 S.F.) Drainage: The existing Forker Road basin drainage problem may involve litigation prior to it's resolution due to the presence of the inadequate canal. Because of this and because no storm water management plan for this basin is anticipated to be forthcoming soon, storm drainage facilities are to be included that will insure the safety of the proposed project and adjacent areas. Storm drainage facilities similar to those described in the ADDENDUM TO SUMMERFIELD DRAINAGE REPORT in APPENDIX A appear to be adequate. BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 85 0707 IN THE MATTER OF ESTABLISHMENT OF STREETS IN SUMMERFIELD EAST ADDITION #1206 COUNTY ENGINEER'S FILE NO. 2583 ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE BY C E'K OF THE BO E PUT Y RESOLUTION - ESTABLISHMENT This being the day set for the hearing on Spokane County Engineer's Report on the proposed establishment of Streets in Summerfield East Addition #1206 proceedings for which were initiated by PRELIMINARY RESOLUTION No. 85 -0622 , and it appearing to the Board on proof duly made that Notice of Hearing was published and posted in the manner and for the time required by law, and the Board after examining the report and maps of the Spokane County Engineer and all claims and papers on file and after hearing all other evidence adduced at the hearing; and IT FURTHER APPEARING That the rights of way have been dedicated as public roads, 44 feet wide and that said roads are a public necessity and the same should be opened and established as County roads. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, that the hereinafter described roads as reported by the Spokane County Engineer on the 27th day of August, 1985, being more particularly described as follows: CALVIN ROAD -- from the Northwest line of Lot 1 Block 3 extended South to the North line of Wellesley Avenue. OLYM OLYMPIA AVENUE -- from the East line of Calvin Road East to the West line of Lot 1 Block 5 extended. WABASH AVENUE -- from the West line of Lot 1 Block 1 extended East to the West li of Calvin Road. and as shown by the records and maps on file in the office of the Spokane County Engineer be and the same hereby are established as County roads and the same shall be known as Calvin Road, Olympic Avenue, and Wabash Avenue No. 2583. The road supervisor of the road district in which the said roads are located is hereby directed to open and maintain the same for public use and travel. PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, this 27th day of August, 1985. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON W ;> 3 5 i:RRtGp:TE 115 , Z44 FARMS 1 AOP 4.8 G � , a c - 2oboR �. _'-13 7T.° z5 1,1 sr- z3o.7 CL- 887.1 44 +79. l Pc • 0 l04 LLn ose'. Inland Bonding Co. P. 0. Box 52 Spokane, WA 99210 Dear Gentlemen: JS /set cc: TDC, Inc. Sari to Nizas CI (o OPPIOE OP COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER Srualuar ,Stisiu \'&rox 99260 • November 1, 1985 RE: Summerfield East Addition PE 1206 Please be advised that Bond Surety Number D289955 by Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, in the amount of $12,500 for improvements in the above addition, may be released. If you have any questions, feel free to call our office. Very truly yours, Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Jefry Sims Plat Inspector Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3600 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION . NO. 85 0707 IN THE MATTER OF ESTABLISHMENT OF STREETS IN SUMMERFIELD EAST ADDITION #1206 COUNTY ENGINEER'S FILE. NO. 2583 This being the day set for the hearing on Spokane County Engineer's Report on the proposed establishment of Streets in Sumnerfield.East Addition #1206 proceedings for which were initiated by PRELIMINARY RESOLUTION No. 85 -0622 ,'and it appearing to the Board on proof duly made that Notice of Hearing was published and posted in the manner and for the time required by law, and the Board after examining the report and maps of the Spokane County Engineer and all claims and papers on file and after hearing all other evidence adduced at the hearing; and IT FURTHER APPEARING That the rights of way have been dedicated as public roads,, 44 feet wide and that said roads are a public necessity and the same should be opened and established as County roads. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, that the hereinafter described roads as reported by the Spokane County Engineer on the 27th day of August, 1985, being more particularly described as follows: CALVIN ROAD OLYMPIA AVENUE - WABASH AVENUE - ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE - - from the Northwest line of Lot 1 Block 3 extended South to the North line of Wellesley Avenue.. RESOLUTION - ESTABLISHMENT - from the East line of Calvin Road East to the West line of Lot .1 Block 5 extended. - from the West line of Lot 1 Block 1 extended East to the West li of Calvin Road. and as shown by the records and maps on file in the office of the Spokane County Engineer be and the same hereby are established as. County roads and the same shall be known as Calvin Road, Olympic Avenue, and Wabash Avenue No. 2583. The road supervisor of the road district in which the said roads are located is hereby directed to open and maintain the same for public and travel. PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Board of County Commissioners-of Spokane County, Washington, this 27th day of August, 1985. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY; WASHINGTON 5242 I r a Washington Trust Bank LCD /cg Leonard C. Decker Vice President Spokane County Engineering Department West 1116 Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99201 Gentlemen: Washington Trust Financial Center IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NO. 697 DATE: March 29, 1984. AMOUNT: $125,800.00 We hereby establish our Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 697 in your favor for the account of TUPPER, INC., East 12929 Sprague Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99216, up to the aggregate amount of ONE HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED AND NO /100 - -- Dollars ($125,800.00) U. S. currency, available by your draft(s) drawn and presented to the Washington Trust Bank, and accompanied by the following: Written request by the Spokane County Engineering Department to the Washington Trust Bank indicating non - completion of all or any part of the improvements to Summerfield East, and the amount of money required to complete such improvements. This Letter of Credit is assurance of completion of installation of roadway surfacing, including grading, gravel and paving, storm drainage, drainage swales, monuments and other works as is incidental and related thereto in accordance with the drawings and specifications for Summerfield East as submitted to and approved by the Spokane County Engineering Department on March 26, 1984. Spokane County Engineering Department will return the original Letter of Credit when the work has been satisfactorily completed. All drafts presented under the credit must contain the clause "Drawn under Washington Trust Bank Letter of Credit No. 697." Any and all banking charges, if any, other than those of the issuinc bank, are for the account of the beneficiary. We hereby engage with the drawers and bona fide holders of drafts drawn under and in compliance 'with the terms of this Letter of Credit that the drafts will be duly honored upon presentation and delivery of documents, as specified, to Washington Trust Bank, P. 0. Box 2127, Spokane, Washington 99210. All drawings under this credit will be governed by the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted by the State of Washington. Sincerely, L. C. Decker, Vice President P.0 Box 2127. Spokane, Washington 99210 (509) 4553897 SPO+ANE COUN1Y COURTHOUSE Washington Trust Bank P.O. Box 2127 Spokane, WA 99210 If you have any JS /set cc: Tupper Inc. Realtors East 12929 Sprague Spokane, WA 99216 questions, 1 1 CL• UN COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER Sinn: Lax*: ,W'itsiaa- tvrov 99260 November 28, 1984 RE: Summerfield East Addition Plat No. PE 1206 Dear Sir: Please be advised that Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 097, for roadway improvements in the above - mentioned plat, in the amount of $12,500 may be released. feel free to call our office. Very truly yours, Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer rry.Sims Senior Plat Inspector Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3600 is incidental cations herein stated. and Indemnity Insurance Company. of North America NEW YORK, NEW YORK 19C Miaolsb Road, Uvingston, New Jenny 07039 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT BOND Princ )alu ,a // �- At'-torney i act) N i �a t D- 289955 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, TDC, Inc. of Spokane, Washington; as PRINCIPAL and INDEMNITY TNRTTRANCF'CO OF NffTR AMFMT0.# corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York and authorized to transact a surety business in the State of Washington, as SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto the Board of County Commis- sioners of Spokane County, Washington, as OBLIGEE, in,the penal sum of Twelve Thousand. Five Hundred ($ ' 12,500.00 ) DOLLARS lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which, well and truly to,be made, the PRINCIPAL and SURETY bind themselves, their heirs; executors, administrators „successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents: SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED this28th. day of Nov. , 1984 WHEREAS, the said PRINCIPAL is the developer of a tract of 'land in :Spokane County known as Summerfield East Addition and being located in Section 35 , Township 2 North; Range 44 E..W.M., in Spokane County, Washington and said County has :required that a bond be furnished'in an amount sufficient to pay the construciion Costs of installing to the oved grades, curbs, and such other work as sidewalks, and /or paving of roadways adjacent to said development necessary thereto all in accordance with County Road Department Specifi- such, improvements to be completed and to the satisfaction of the County, Engineer; in two years or less time unless.said time period be extended at,the option of the County Engineer. Upon failure of the PRINCIPAL to comply with . the requirements stated herein within the time authorized, the OBLIGEE shall look to the SURETY for satisfaction to the extent of this BOND. The obligation of opinion of the OBLIGEE, written release will be release and the SURETY hereby this BOND shall be kept in full force and ;effect until, in the the requirements herein stated have been satisfied in, which event given by the OBLIGEE, the OBLIGEE having sole'right to grant such Waives all rights to .release from the obligation except as CE CO OF Eu ," ORTH AMERICA IND -12531 POWER OF ATTORNEY - ORU OTV ll• RAICE COMPANY OF : A EG OCk4 individually, its true and lawful agents and attorneys -in -fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver for and on New York, New York 19C'Microlab Road, Livingston, New Jersey 07039 AUTHORITY FOR TO ACT AS ATTORNEY IN-FAC A E F L STATE WASH NOT VALID FOR BOND IN EXCESS OF AN $t ?0 5 - ' CENTSS ITEM'I bebad, and as its act and deed as EXECUTED AND NOT•RI E0 10 Mo. 0 84 ^ POWER NUMBER 11 289955 cheated In item 1. , * I MPfRTANTr ANY ANM ALL RRNfS ANlr UNIIF.ITAKINGS NOT IN EXCESS nF TWENTY FIVE THnUSAINU*4"* nnLLARS (825,000.00), FXCLUoIING HnWEt /FR FINANCIAL GUARANTEE, F3fN AMIIUNT, s 12,500.00 nBLIGFE. Spo. Co. .VnTI) IF Nf1T CnMPLETE is • * * ,-, r KNOW ALL MEN BV THESE PRESENTS: That INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY' OF NORTH AMERICA, a corporation of the State of New York. having its Executive Offices in the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. pursuant to'the following By -Law, which was adopted by the Board of Directors of said company on November 19, 1958, to wit: _ _ - ARTICLE III. OFFICERS . Section B. Resident Officers and Attomeys -In -Fact. The President, the Executive Vice - President, or any Vice - President shall have power and authority to appoint Resident Vice- Presidents. Resident Assistant Secretaries and Attorneys -In -Fact: and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, bonds and undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and attach the seal of the Company thereto, except such seal shall not be necessary when any bond or other obligation shall be executed under a power of attorney to which the seal of the Company is attached and such power of attorney attached to such bond or other obligation. • This Power of Attorney Is signed and sealed -by facsimile under and by the authority of the following resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on November 19. 1958: . , - 1 "Resolved, that the signature of the President, or any Executive Vice - President or any Vice - President and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney. and the. signature of the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary and the seal of the Company may, be affixed facsimile to any certificate of any such power and any • such power or certificate bearing such facsimile signature and seal shall be valid and binding on the Company. Any such power so executed and sealed and certified by certificate so executed and sealed shall, with respect to any bond or undertaking to w hich it is attached, continue to be valid and binding on the Company" - ThS 'POWER DGF ALTERED On.. SEE) And the execution of such bonds or Undertakings in pursuance of these presents shall be as binding upon said Company as fully end amply, to all - intents and purposes. as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its Executive Offices in New York, New York, in their own proper persons. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF,1IyJEMayr .& NSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA has caused these presents to be signed by its Senior Vice-President and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed' on the date set fonh ab s et/ x ' - \11 / / tam t 1 7I COMMONWEALTH O I A COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA ' . J as. j INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA Senior Vice- President On the month, day and year as set forth above, before me, a Notary Public in and for said county and state, personally came C. DANIEL DRAKE, to me known, who. being by me duly sworn did depose and say that he is a Senior Vice- President of INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument, that he knows the seal of the corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed pursuant to authority given by the Board of Directors of said corporation and that he signed his name thereto pursuant t .Nks 'ority and acknowledges same to be the act and deed of said corporation. .COMMONWEALTH OFYENNSVLVANIA COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA } 55. PUBLIC = - ' i 1, JAMES 5. COALE „if.,Ask.Sec patAry='ot. INDEMN ITV INSURANCE COMPANY OF - NORTH AMERICA, do hereby cenify that Article III, Section 6, of Company By-Laws and Resolution of the Board of Directors as set idr ;f mi,ttP Wer of Attorney is still in full force and effect. In witness whereof I have hereunto subscribed my name on the date set forth above - My Commission Expires June, 1984 • / A Assistant Secretary NOTE (1) A SEPARATE POWER OF ATTORNEY MUST BE ATTACHED TO EACH BOND EXECUTED. (2) POWERS OF ATTORNEY MUST NOT BE RETURNED TO ATTORNEY -IN -FACT BUT SHOULD BE RETURNED TO THE COMPANY. - Washington Trust Bank P.O. Box 2127 Spokane, WA 99210 . JS /set cc: Tupper Inc. Realtors East 12929 Sprague Spokane, WA 99216 COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT 5. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER SrgnaNr: ,Wssn:NtvroN 99260 November 14, 1984 Jerry Sims Senior Plat Inspector• RE: Summerfield East Addition Plat No. PE 1206 Dear Sir: Please be advised that Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 097, for roadway improvements in the above — mentioned plat, in the amount of $25,000 may be reduced to $12,500. If you have any questions,- feel free to call our office. Very truly yours, Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3600 Cr 0 Name...cninf Proje No. CRP/RID Report No. • Contractor and/or Sub(s) - Tver6s :hi t Asa • • 6 • ' Number I' ..„ • , ifi`cat,1 on , • T'U'• " 'sonnet ( • . 41 • g521f A• • .7..41: •••..• ' - c N., vi -,. •-' ••"- b•t • t• • ''Y :' :,7 ' • • . 1 114, 11..• (Ac I, ,• i - d 1 t .. t n i ary"Aect i on"- t...,, ,-.. , • . . • •f --... ht. -ttt •frt 4 , . r* 1.7-t... '<f•'• :, 7 7 . 7 . . Coriinents ski SwA le ban, Apin Sr.! )5,e4 i ;I Ai., Cinic-- es razwr af l;pr /3 St.k,2. 0/ via' fa) :13? e • . . .... e SIA fisdlik; Ana' APPIZOAC.6 IA/ nelar as 1127 /3 Rik. 2 • " • . " • • Ttik-F.hreit/a/CA" Si.f;el6 / c / jeko;i1 o;e lali /3 a/ l< 2 Aye Chao ciao 2) let nv '6i/iiriz2r --4. ' -': ktooro n4.)14-mtl/-: sm. 'too At .frz-s 1;.iii,hict t/45ter;70,0fr co r , iStk / 4 i07 ‘..144b z.". ,sa/ A6h„.4) 7,, iv,rowiciblft R.44,A 'a C.42.01/. %` 41/Aa A jai 44't 4 :: •• 604 Ofi 0 .5 i/Okitt ilat ; • • ••:•' . •• Y r f, , ,j SdA n 10PP/to:GO/ Ott' 1494A red /A Ric Wierld 41C,a let-LiArifffr;edAVi Lai 504 ' new ovn aoPt leoh;Rs cviAl „ . th. • Q. ri:ecirci;.): Rain < •i• RAT Saliva& As w .P 0 s sir 4: . • ' • • Rank 4./toot ti A-me* OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER NORTH 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 509-456-3600 g 'Equipment Li st 4 -• • INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE PORT ohi l-h 4 5; 9 7- / • . . • ;S • 4- 43 OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTI F!!6INEFR NORTH 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 509-456-3600 tftAillf 7.L. • • . , • .., Date Project 2724 Inspectorj-tZ Project No. CRP/RID Weather Report No. Time Charged Contractor this Day -1/2 or 1 Contractor and/or Sub-iii7v Other County Personnel 2 5 6 3 4 5 6 Contractor Personnel Classification 1 Equipment List INSPEC1OR":, SIGNATURE r/ 5 Hrs. lises Stan Number Diary Section Comments (I) r'n C 594»41Ro ze/A herM 5ib-We...21'i7 "' cA el C , t pJ.n , Jt.j, 4 4A . :•••• r' :yA ; n ii .!hytA • . .t 4Z" 7;A; "Cis C' -t -) I ft • • Inter - office Communication To From Form 327 —C. R. C NFL-1014 OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Cot. (it (a. j .e —f ry t h Lt. u ( Dote / 0 /3 # ,19 Subject S h.wvvve r"f €14 End /gob b L �02 G• r - ve\ 04 4' 4e pctk e^ „o 0 kited ^/� - �a- � - 3 Y 5 `' d I^C.lJ . ,J .Ie c a rv� 4 Qr A. e A tt S' 0+ R. 0 7C.? Jake /0 / Sip SD.:1LC "_)A '1. J ►rav tr 114 o, n,.:C ..Y COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT 5. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER SIP4IDALAINCE ,«w111NOICON - 119::01 December 5, 1978 TO: Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Director Planning Department FROM: Gary Kennaly, Planning & Traffic Division Engines Spokane County Engineer's Office SUBJECT: Draft EIS Review of Summerfield East We have completed our review and analysis of the Draft EIS and offer the following comments for your consideration. Section 4. Transportation /Circulation 1. Trent Avenue should be identified as SR 290 because it is a State Highway and is under the jurisdiction of the State Department of Transportation -- not the County Road Department. 2. In addition to the arterials mentioned in the Draft, Forker Road and Progress Road are designated arterials, adjacent to and pro- viding direct access to the proposed development but not mentioned in this portion of the Draft. - 3. Due to operational and geometric characteristics of Worker Road, additional right of way dedication and construction of left turn facilities may be required to mitigate possible traffic safety hazards from traffic entering this proposed development from Forker Road. 4. Same statement as 113 only referring to Progress Road. 5. Same statement as 113 only referring to Wellesley Road. 6. No mention as to impacts or provisions for pedestrian and /or biker facilities on roads proposed in the plat. Sidewalks on neigh- borhood collector arterials are required and will partially address pedestrian facilities. To date the neighborhood collector arterials contained in this plat proposal have not been designated. This comment is noted. This comment is noted. This comment is noted. This comment is noted. This comment is noted. Pedestrian facilities (sidewalks) are mentioned as a measure to mitigate adverse impacts under 4.6 Traffic Hazards on page 52 of the DEIS.. Provisions for bikepaths could also mitigate potential traffic hazards within the plat. 115 4 d nl Washing, ton Trust aa P.C. Box 2121 Spokane, WA 99210 Lear Sir: Please he advised - that lrrevocable of Credit No.•091, for roadway improvements in tiie ahbve- mentioned .plat, In the amount'6? $125,000 may be • reduced to $25,000: • r If you have'any.uuestiopa, feel free to.cail our office. (:� �r/ • JS /set cc: Tupper. Inc. Realtors East 12929 Sprague • Spokane,.'WA 99216. 4 August ?; 1984 r •PE: Summerfield Epst Addition Plat No PE .1206 Very truly yours, Robert S. Turner, Y.E. Spokrarte, County Engineer Jerry Bien Senior `Plat Inspectpr • Dear Sir: GrunANL cnur.r. woks H(JUSt AMOUNT OF STREET IMPROVEMENT BOND UY YI cue; CIE COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER SrufAXE ,'WAMIlaly rrON 99260 t 27, Subdivision Name: SL∎wew Pi r ' e (1 EctAi PE jaoC One of the requirements set forth by the Spokane County Planning Commission in connection with the above titled plat involves the filing with. this office of a Street Improvement Bond. A preliminary inspection of the plat has been made by this office and the amount of the Street Improvement Bond found to be as follows: Grading $ Surfacing 76# Drainage 7 � o c 0 00 1D6w4LlC 3l 5 -45. _° Other AIL .l 'M rS (72 910 !2 SttFcr 6tcos ( ) 2ZS' Tr, ° Co-Par D Q A \ , �� ) 7 ZO at A Street Improvement Bond in the above amount must be filed with this office prior to approval of the final plat. The bond will be released only upon satisfactory completion of the required street improvement. Please contact this office when work on the improvement is ready for inspection. or if you desire additional information or advice concerning the work. Yours very truly. Robert S. Turner, P.E. County Engineer By ITEM Quantity Price Cost Completion % 1) Monuments 2) Barricade 3) ( () No Street Signs ') 36' Z' ,» dL yd 40. co -Y4 as Torts 1 1 1...,F j-535-1-'S 5,3 &2. Z4o2_1F 2_ 4o26r' I CS: c.-1.0( 9CkYd 72 Tv" . 31 0 r-F 7) 3 t/ ,4eC ?d 1 r€ Tan ( �.F boo LF MrgL F J3o — o � O . 70-6- (( 5 3 35 - 2-535 S� 8 S 7 1f e3 3.S ¢° 8-- 7 I1 !_ 3 p 0 4 5 _ 2°• 7 I 1 Bo Jr r-' 4 ?S BZ /5- e _ g/ ,o`: z� 5v3 = 7a3l- 4� z 1 0 1(,17 2P 3 2. ex -- 0134(°° (0S37,`9 7-111.0 1 („0.2,-4 .2_110(-)5_ (o 2,5-°° 7 p SS o 17 0 i 2 n 432-- 2-13-3)!"" Iii 49 �s S ,e 2.,�� S off_ go?: 113 ` 31' VC) � i , P 4 o, m Jr" € G � d-e l � `: rift 9f ' w.n-- p �,11' o � v 0 4) O), (lrs I RG i BC wine /n 4" TC ` n AC C & G i Side(s)311t-F 6 Walk _i_____ Si de( s 5) 'y h / RG 0 ). - BC Obi wide ¢ TC 7. AC C: &<G - c-- Side s)) � Walk ____2__ Si de( s) RG - 3(,, wide BC —2 AC C :8 6. Z Side(s) 4'wide.Walk Z Si de s) I u r✓∎,o'ic A 0 r RG wide BC AC C 2 Side(s) ,S4 6 Walk Si de( s) _7 8) Sicte-cAfr,fg RG wide BC TC AC —C — & -G Sides Walk ( Si de( s 9) wide TC C & G Si Walk Side((s 10) 11) 12) ins AME �C ' ,75 ni TOTAL USE • DATE .2. 2/e, I Iuantit Price Cost Completion % Precast Drywell - Std. Precast Drywell - Dbl. Backfill for DW Concrete Inlet l 4'- CJILQpipe c? Dia. 2- CA, CI �A 0p0 0 c ��( a d'7�('1" a S 2Fer. i_A, ? c 8 1 900, 8:004,-411-A-6 775 cl— S= 0== ss° o 00C 15Z 1 Sfla6� - sys 6 ' :/6�)- 350 )9otA'8 1 afiliI, • pipe Dia. pipe Dia. pipe Dia. Precast Manhole s� Ditch Excavation , 35 yd. - R1 Sod /9 ift ''(4 CircrtAe aye 4-2'19 ( 4'x133 j /R = 1 (3 EA Sub Total Contingencies TOTAL Drainage PROJECT ITE 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) INSPECTOR DATE SLtirnrr -R K IEL 0 ra « nTw 00L13 sNf rt I = 5 NE£C (- NAME er, N, LSioA/ DATE 2. -ryt &A - t PE's Std. Bdl. Dwl Conc. /0 Dia. Page Dwl Dwl BKF Inlet - Tripe 1 1 L) to 2 / i() 3 cl t--0 c9 0 6 • , _ac(/ 4 D i a. OTHER NEAO ape 1V0L-L 2M/N4GE dSoo 8 130?-_ c) 68 ' 8 fi--) 5 4 BE 590 , sx )70 = 9-100 Ff X 27 7 3 a hn ^ - -F/ e As+ cr OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER / SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Q� Date 3 , 19 " Inter - office Communication --: A From E r . A/r ! (s o /q 6 1C 4, c . 4.C. - �1 r u Subject � CC . << E Ni' A vp . 7 /" of ,Form 327 -CR. Vc/ur4-1- !s A.5g SURF 4 /A/C E /S 7 0A) k(z L L ESL E A ier P // AMT. OF ACCOUNI AMI •-AID BAL ANCE DUE 8K808 RE 14,40".•••••••• RECEIPT _ Received From E R Address F • _talk! Pf 4 a Li Dollars $ For _a_11/1212;M It L_ID / ( F / 41, Le ( tc• g ACCOUNT HOW PAID SR C.:Our ¥ ENGINf ER N. Bi t ScitchbFEB TiT TS INGTON 99260 CASH CHECK MONEY ORDER I SUMMERF I ELD,EAST 38.8 TUPPER INC. REALTORS CONSTRUCTION ACCOUNT East 12929 Sprague Avenue Spokane, Washington 99216 928-1991 PAY EXACTLY/r******480**DOLLARS AND 00 CENTS I No. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS 3818 s 000 3E1 L8H• 25 L0001391: 6 3 5•03 311° Main Office WASHINGTON TRUST BANK Spokane, WA " No. 3 818 - - 6955 L UOLLARS C T 00***** F AO. OAY YR. TUPPE#ANCREALTQR 4 se 28.8/1251 'Ja .- _l.L L_. a. SPOKANE COUNT PLANNING DEPARTMENT County Assessor, Bldg. & Safety, County Treasurer, To (L ounty Engineer Environmental Health, Utilities From John Nunnery, Subdivision Administrator Subject DRAFT Final Plat - Attachment 1 -1 6 —73 52WAl5API EaV 4i}57 = pokriov of Date .3/ , 19 Please review the attached DRAFT Final Plat and let me know the results of your review. te-f-tee2-/-4-rtsterfe< 102-0-e a_ eepti 1 Sea Difrow RECEIVED FEB 0 8 1884 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ° Transancricr 1 We Insurance Set i1 r E PIA NNlN� N Q E pA RTMEN I 'THIRD CERTIFICATE TO PLAT Spokane County Planning Commission N. 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington Ti nn!.nnorica I illo Insurance (:Orel: • North 720 Argonne lions] Spokane, Washington 99200 (509) 922-2222 Order No.:97855 -M O( I�IT1 V INOUEE AUG1 3/980 Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat of SUMMERFIELD EAST ADDITION Gentlemen: In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of Spokane County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in Spokane County, to -wit: A parcel of land in the South half of Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 E.W.M., being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the South quarter corner of Section 35; thence South 89 ° 52'00" West along the South line of the Southwest quarter of said Section and centerline of Wellesley Avenue as it now exists 60 feet in width a distance of 661.05 feet; thence 'North 00 ° 05'38" West, a distance of 30.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue and True Point of Beginning of this description; thence North 00 ° 05'38" West along the East boundary of PLAT NO. 4 OF WEST FARMS IRRIGATED TRACTS, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 51, a distance of 1121.63 feet; thence North 62 ° 23'41" East, a clistance of 192.97 feet; thence North 40 ° 31'59" East, a distance of 48.01 feet; thence North 65 °56'49" East, a clistance of 128.00 feet; thence South 46 °13'24" East, a distance of 114.31 feet; thence East a distance of 469.10 feet; thence North 79 ° 35'56" East, a distance of 133.39 feet,. thence South 56 ° 39'30" East, a distance of 63.63 feet; thence North 74 ° 28'06" East, a distance of 128.00•-feet; thence South 13 ° 55'30" East, a.distance of 75.19 feet; thence South 89 ° 56'40" East, a distance of 36.43 feet; thence South 00 ° 03'20" West, a distance of 123.00 feet; thence South 36 ° 02.'26" East, a distance of 54.45 feet; thence South 00 ° 03'20" West, a distance of 123.00 feet; thence South 89 ° 56'40" East, a distance of 375.09 feet; thence South -00 ° 25'19" West, a distance of 560.01 feet; thence North 89 ° 56'40" West, a distance of 342.67 feet; thence South 00 ° 03'20" West, a distance of 133.00 feet; thence South 06 ° 17'44" West, a distance of 44.26 feet; thence South 00 ° 03'20" West, a distance 11 of 143.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue, as it now exists 60 feet in width; thence North 89 ° 56'40" West along said Northerly margin a distance of 274.98 feet; thence North a • distance of 903.42 feet; thence West a distance of 700.00 feet; thence South a distance of 903.90 feet to said Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue; thence South 89 ° 52'00" West along said Northerly margin a distance of 311.10 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. VESTED IN: OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, a national banking association, as Trustee under agreement with Faye S. Elliott' dated September 28, 1972 and MERCEDES JESKE, a married woman, as her sole and separate property. EXCEPTIONS 1. General taxes for the year 1980 the amount of $503.02 and $596.9 including Weed District Tax and (Parcel No. 35643 -9017) General taxes for the year 1980 the amounts of $471.49 and $559. including Weed District Tax and (Parcel No. 35644 -9024) 2. Assessments for the year 1980 de payable to Trentwood Irrigation plus Treasurer's Fee. (Parcel No Assessments for the year 1980 de payable to Trentwood Irrigation plus Treasurer's Fee. (Parcel No (continued) Page 2 Order No. 97855 -M THIRD CERT. TO PLAT and prior years delinquent in 7, respectively, plus interest; Fire Patrol Tax. and prior years delinquent in 67, respectively, plus interest; Fire Patrol Tax. linquent in the District No. 3, . 35643 -9017) linquent in the District No. 3, . 35644 -9024) amount of $231.00 plus interest, amount of $217.00 plus interest, 3. Liability to future assessments by Trentwood Irrigation District . No. 3. 4. Reservation of mineral rights by Northern Pacific Railway in Deed dated September 1, 1883 and recorded October 20, 1886 as. Document No. 946, as follows: Reserving and excepting from said lands such as are now known or shall hereafter be ascertained to contain coal or iron, and also the use of such surface ground as may be necessary for mining operations; and the right of access to such reserved and excepted coal and iron lands for the purpose of exploring, developing and working the same. 5•. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described, as granted by Deed recorded as Document No. 432623. 6. Easements over and across said property for constructing and maintaining telephone and electric power lines disclosed by Document .No. 324569. 7. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantee: Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3: Purpose: Underground pipeline of the district for the transportation and delivery of water, of a size not to exceed 12 inches in diameter Dated: January 12, 1966 Recorded: .January 17, 1966 Recording No.: 171591C 8. CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Seller: Old National Bank of Washington, a national banking association, as Trustee under agreement with Faye S. Elliott dated September 28, 1972, and Mercedes Jeske, a married woman as her sole and separate property Purchaser: The W. Main Corporation, a Washington corporation, as to an undivided 50% interest, and T.D.C., Inc. a Washington corporation, as to an undivided 50% interest Dated: April 2, 1979 Recorded: April 6, 1979 Recording No.: 7904060363 cC: IPEC 0 Records examined to July 28, ,1980 'at' 8:00 A. MT TRAN By: Page 3 Order No. 97855 -M THIRD CERT. TO PLAT E INSURANCE COMPANY ■ . Chuck Boevii.ng // 74P 0 Transamenco- Title Services Fir Inland Pacific Engineering Co. S. 25 Altamont Spokane, WA Gentlemen: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (continued) Transamerica _ Title Insurance Company North 720 Argonne Road Spokane, Washington 99212 (509) 922-2222 CERTIFICATE TO PLAT / 2a to Order No. LM- 117812 -M Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat of SUMMERFIELD EAST In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval,. this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor.and County Clerk of Spokane County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in Spokane County, to wit: That portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 E.W.M., in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the South Quarter corner of Section 35;,thence, South 89 ° 52'00" West along the South line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section and centerline of Wellesley Avenue as it now exists 60.00 feet in width, a distance of 661.05 feet; thence North 00 °05'38" West, a distance of 30.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue and True Point of Beginning of thiscdescription; thence North 00 ° 05'38" West along the East boundary of Plat No. 4 of West Farms Irrigated Tracts, as per plat thereof recorded in Book "0" of Plats, page 51, in the Spokane County Auditor's Office, a distance of 1121763 -feet; thence North 62 °23'41" East, a distance of feet; thence North 40 ° 31'59" East, a dis- tance of. 48);0 L_feet; thence North 65 ° 56'49" East, a distance of 128:O.O feet; thence South 46 ° 13'24" East, a distance of 114.31,feet; thence South 23 ° 53'53" West, a distance of c130 :45 feet; thence South 12 ° 01'08" East, a distance of r5 2.56_feet; thence South 18 ° 34'40" West, a distance of 146:87" "feet; thence South a distance of 910.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue, as it now exists 60.00 feetcin- width; thence South 89 ° 52'00" West along said North- erly margin a distance of 311.10 feet to the True Point of Beginning of thiscdescription. VESTED IN: Order No. LM- 117812 -M Page 2 - PLAT CERTIFICATE 'OLD - NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTGN, a national banking association, as Trustee under Agreement with Faye S. Elliott dated September 28, 1972; and MERCEDES- JESKE, a married woman, as her sole and separate property. EXCEPTIONS: 1. General taxes as follows, together with interest and penalty, if any, after delinquency; affecting this and other property: Tax Account No. Year 35643 -9017 1981 1982 1983 1984 Annual Billing Amount Paid $426.11 $0.00 $424.19 $0.00 $781.09 $0.00 AMOUNTS NOT YET AVAILABLE Balance Due $426.11 $424.19 $781.09 Assessments levied by Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3, as follows, together with interest and penalty, if any, after delin- quency: Tax Account No. Year Annual Billing Amount Paid Balance Due 35643 -9017 1983 $231.00 $0.00 $231.00 3. Liability for future assessments levied by Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3. 4. Reservation of mineral rights by Northern Pacific Railway in Deed dated September 1, 1883, recorded October 20, 19886, as Document No. 946, as follows: - Reserving and excepting from said lands such,as are now known, or shall hereafter be ascertained to contain coal or iron, and also the use of such surface ground as may be necessary for mining operations; and the right of access to such reserved and excepted coal and iron lands for the purpose of exploring, de- veloping and working the same. 5. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described, as granted by Deed recorded as Document No. 432623. 6. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDTTIONS THEREOF: Grantee: Spokane Valley Land & Water Co. Purpose: Constructing and maintaining telephone and electric power lines Area Affected: Over and across said property Dated: May 19, 1911 Recorded: May 26, 1911 Recording No..: 324569 (continued) 7. CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Seller: Old National Bank of Washington, a national banking association, as Trustee under Agree- ment with Faye S. Elliott dated September 28, 1972, and Mercedes Jeske, a married woman as her sole and separate property Purchaser: The W. Main Corporation, a Washington corpor- ation as to an undivided 50% interest and T.D.C. Inc., a Washington corporation, as to an undivided 50% interest Dated: April 2, 1979 Recorded: April 6, 1979 Recording No.: 7904060363 Purchaser's interest is now held of record by' Tupper, Inc., a Washington corporation, as to an undivided 50% interest and in +Bruce B. Butler and Judith A. Butler, husband and wife, an un- divided 50% interest. Records examined as to January 3; 1984 at 8:00 A.M. pds cc: County Planning County Engineers By: TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No, LM- 117812 -M Page 3 - PLAT CERTIFICATE Lardy Mattson Title Officer -v2 io 3 w 7 . /�S�Ac y2in 111•101. EMI CMI ;/T /Wyg //2 / leims 77 R l .l ✓^dam _ 1 L onsernses ma .n .pi' _ ® ®e at mm — - - 1® ® ® ® ®s 1 RANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY NORTH 720 ARGONNE ROAD SPOKANE, WA, 99206 Pi w 4 ibis print is made solely for the purpose of assisting in Iodating said premises and the company assumes'it fie ouily for vsroliuns it any in dimensions and h¢aimn ste/Iau,ed by in Iola; snrcey. • I� �cr• . IE Vi i.. 4 ry O -- o • - ."r3 a LD w n • Inter- office Communication T Snnkana rniinty Snhdjuicinn plm jnl tratnr From Bob McCann. Plat Insoector SubjectSubdivision Apenda Srhadii1ed for Parinn Fah, 1 14;11 I have reviewed the extension of time requests that are listed below. The Engineer's Department has no new conditions to add at this time. AE-1206 Summerfleld East PS - 1399 Morotto's Addition PS -1254 Windsong Second Addition PE -1366 Blue Skies Second Addition OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date January 10. iq 82 wawa 3 TO: Location: Comprehensive Proposal: Action: Board of County Commissioners 7 7% -vr ilg PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 9926 e ` E Il, C+ ApE Ue VE D i ctrl engi it a FROM: John Nunnery, Plat Administrator Q DATE: January 29, 1982 JJ SUBJECT: Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee Actions - January 28, 1982 Gentlemen: On January 28, 1982, the Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee met at 9:00 a.m. to consider two Extensions of Time, one Certificate -of- Exemption Appeal, one Short Plat Appeal, and one Preliminary Plat Subdivision. Following are the applications in sequence and the action taken by the Committee. If not appealed, these decisions are final ten (10) calendar days after Findings and Order have been signed. Findings and Order will be signed Tuesday, February 2, 1981. The Hearing Examiner Committee Board members were: Jerry Williams, Chair- person, Jane Myers and Eldon L. Thomas. 1 PE-1206 -78, mmerfield East -Time Extension -Wm. Main Corp. & TDC, Inc. ZE- 202-78 , .ricultural to R -1 Location: Located in the Trentwood area of the Spokane Valley adjacent to and north of Wellesley Avenue, west of Progress Road, south of Forker Road and east of Bannen Road. Sec. 35 -26 -44 Comprehensive Plan: URBAN (approved prior to Plan adoption) Proposal: 91 acres into 266 lots for single - family dwellings. Action: Approval - Unanimous 2. PS- 1362 -79, Kahuna Hills 1st Addition - Time Extension - Kahuna Land Co. ZS- 262-79, Agricultural Suburban to R -1 Located adjacent and east of Carnahan Road between 12th and 16th to the southeast of Spokane City. Sec. 23 -25 -43 Plan: URBAN (approved prior to Plan adoption) 16± acres into 39 lots for single - family dwellings. Approval - Unanimous Subdivision Hearing 2 Examiner Committee tion - January 28, 1982 3. CE- 288 -81 (A thru D), Moore - Appeal of Denial - Patrick J. Moore Location: The southwest corner of the intersection of Lincoln Road and Craig Road on the "West Plains" Sec. 27-26 -41 Comprehensive Plan: RURAL Proposal: Request to be exempt from County Short Plat Ordinance to divide 20 acres into four 5 -acre lots, through Certificates - of- Exemptions. Action: Appeal Approval - Unanimous (to approve and issue Certificates -of- Exemptions) 4. SP -81 -193 Short Plat - Appeal of Denial - Robert and Lola McLellan Location: Located 1500 feet northwest of South Bank Road and adjacent and north of McLellan Lane, all north of Four Mounds Prairie and 500 feet east of the Spokane River (Long Lake). Sec. 31 -28 -41 and Sec. 1 -27 -40 Comprehensive Plan: RURAL Proposal: 91 acres of 400+ acres divided into nine 5 -acre lots, one 3 1 /2-acre recreational lot, and one 38 -acre "large lot" used for overall density of 10 -units per acre. Action: Appeal Denied - 2 to 1 5. PE-1419 -81, Liberty Point - Preliminary Subdivision - J. P. Stravens Location: Adjacent to east shoreline of Liberty Lake and approxi- mately 1/4 mile south of Neyland Road and Lakeside Road intersection. Sec. 23 & 24 -25 -45 Comprehensive Plan: URBAN Proposal: 4 acres± into 6 lots for single - family dwellings. Action: Approval - Unanimous rA.-" > 4 9ttt79 «! tr i i.'02 AGENDA, January 28, 1982` __ TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEA`R'ING= EX-AM.LNER COMMITTEE —ate_ ; TIME: Thursday, January 28, 1982' -- 0D.,A,..M.(,Item #1 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME PE- 1206 -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST ZE- 202 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO R -1 a. Location: Located in the Trentwood area of the Spokane Valley adjacent to and north of Wellesley Avenue; west of Progress Road, south of Forker Road and east of Bannen Road. b. Legal Description: Section 35, Township 26N, Range 44 EWM That portion of the NW 1/4 of Section 35, in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, lying SEly of Forker Road and SWIy of the power line easement as recorded on January 19, 1943, under Auditor's File No. 572309A; Also the E 1/2 of E 1/2 of SW 1/4 of said Section; And also that portion of the W 1/2 of the E 1/2 of said Section lying SWIy of said power line easement; Except the Spokane Valley Land & Water Company's canal right -of -way; And except commencing at the SW corner of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said section; thence east along the south line of said section, a distance of 350 ft; thence north a distance of 933.42 ft; thence west a distance of 700 ft; thence south a distance of 933.42 ft..to the south line of said .Section 35; thence east along the south line of said section a distance of 350 ft. to the point of beginning. And except Wellesley Avenue; And except that portion of the NW 1/4 of said section lying within Plat #4, West Farms Irrigated Tracts as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, Page 51. c Sponsors: W.Main Corporation & TDC, Inc. E 12720 Nora Avenue E 12929 Sprague Avenue Spokane, WA. 99216 Spokane, WA. 99216 d. Engineer: I.P.E.C. E 12720 Nora Avenue Spokane, WA. 99216 e. Site Size: 91 acres f. Number of Lots: 266 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: R -1 j. Water Source: Trentwood Irrigation District #3 k. School District: East Valley #361 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tanks m. Environmental Impact: A proposed declaration of non - significance (a preliminary decision, which may be reversed, that an environmental impact statement, an EIS, is not needed) has been administratively issued. This in- sures the applicant of a timely processing of his /her proposal at the time of the public hearing. BUT, a major purpose of the public hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the PE- 1206 -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST decision makers with information as to whether or not a potential SIGNFICANT ADVERSE impact upon the physical environment will result from implementation of the proposal, thus resulting in the need for an EIS. However, all "extensions of time" and most "change of conditions: are exempt from the provisions of SEPA; check with the Planning Department staff if uncertainty exists. n. Applicant is requesting a Time Extension until February 1, 1983. East East Val ley Va IIvy J r. H igh 3iig 50u chool WELLESL w E L' 1A Ober� 'M r STAFF ANALYSIS - January 28, 1982 PE- 1206 -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST ZE- 202 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R -1i PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. History The proposal was approved January, 1979, and given a one -year time extension on January, 1981, by the Subdivision Hearing Examiners Committee. The proposal is to be phased. To date no phase has been finalized. The sponsor has worked with the school district to satisfy conditions of approval and has worked with F.H.A. regarding method of sewage disposal. Other studies, reports, design work, drafting, and surveying has been accomplished; however, the current slowdown in residential construction has complicated immediate finalization of the first phase. The sponsor is therefore request- ing a time extension until February 1, 1983. B. Location The Trentwood area of the Spokane Valley, more specifically, adjacent to and north of Wellesley Avenue, west of Progress Road, south of Forker Road and east of Bannen Road. C. Proposal - 91 acres subdivided into 268 Lots for single family use • Lot frontage = 80' ▪ Lot sizes = 10,000 sq. ft. ▪ Phase - one = 81 Lots II. SPECIAL INFORMATION No additional conditions of approval are being recommended by the various departments. III. CONDITIONS If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record. 2. That a time extension be granted to February 1, 1983 l a a q 5 r w G.e. - 1Z-eyceseat;n.q gettoa► D isTti . RequesTe4 ryv2e-'t 0,31 t -tn Stansor A .s. A • p Riggs - 1B AGENDA, January 28, 1982 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Thursday, January 28, 1982 - 9:00 A.M.(Item #1 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME PE- 1206 -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST ZE- 202 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO R -1 a. Location: Located in the Trentwood area of the Spokane Valley adjacent to and north of Wellesley Avenue, west of Progress Road, south of Forker Road and east of Bannen Road. b. Legal Description: Section 35, Township 26N, Range 44 EWM That portion of the NW 1/4 of Section 35, in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, lying SEly of Forker Road and SWIy of the power line easement as recorded on January 19, 1943, under Auditor's File No. 572309A; Also the E 1/2 of E 1/2 of SW 1/4 of said Section; And also that portion of the W 1/2 of the E 1/2 of said Section lying SW1y of said power line easement; Except the Spokane Valley Land & Water Company's canal right -of -way; And except commencing at the SW corner of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said section; thence east along the south line of said section, a distance of 350 ft; thence north a distance of 933.42 ft; thence west a distance of 700 ft; thence south a distance of 933.42 ft..to the south line of said .Section 35; thence east along the south line of said section a distance of 350 ft. to the point of beginning. And except Wellesley Avenue; And except that portion of the NW 1/4 of said section lying within Plat #4, West Farms Irrigated Tracts as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, Page 51. c. Sponsors: W.Main Corporation & TDC, Inc. E 12720 Nora Avenue E 12929 Sprague Avenue Spokane, WA. 99216 Spokane, WA. 99216 d. Engineer: I.P.E.C. E 12720 Nora Avenue Spokane, WA. 99216 e. Site Size: 91 acres f. Number of Lots: 266 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: R -1 j. Water Source: Trentwood Irrigation District #3 k. School District: East Valley #361 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tanks m. Environmental Impact: A proposed declaration of non- significance (a preliminary decision, which may be reversed, that an environmental impact statement, an EIS, is not needed) has been administratively issued. This in- sures the applicant of a timely processing of his /her proposal at the time of the public hearing. BUT, a major purpose of the public hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the 1 PE- 1206 -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST decision makers with information as to whether or not a potential SIGNFICANT ADVERSE impact upon the physical environment will result from implementation of the proposal, thus resulting in the need for an EIS. However, all "extensions of time" and most "change of conditions: are exempt from the provisions of SEPA; check with the Planning Department staff if uncertainty exists. n. Applicant is requesting a Time Extension until February 1, 1983. lA East Valley Jr. H igh School WELLESLEY East Va Il11 y *Rh Sclxe wEL` SPO. AMC COUNTY COURT MOUSE Location: Proposal: Action: 2. PE 136 ZE- 264 -79, Location: Proposal: Action: PLANNING DEPARTMENT January 30, 1981 BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Steve P. Horobiowski, Plat Administrator SUBJECT: Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of January 29, 1981 GENTLEMEN: On January 29, 1981, the Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee met at 9:00 A.M. to consider three Time Extensions, one Time Extension with a Change of Condition, two preliminary subdivisions and one final Planned Unit Development Review and Change of Condition. Following are the applications in sequence and the action taken by the Committee. If not appealed, these decisions are final 10 calendar days after Findings and Order are signed by the Hearing Examiner Committee which was January 29, 1981. Hearing Examiner Committee Board members were: John Culler - Chairman, Kathy Carstens and Ted McCoury. 1 1. PE- 1206 -78 - Summerfield East - Extension of Time - W.Main Corp. & TDC, Inc. �ZE- 202 -78, Agricultural to R -1 In the Trentwood area of Spokane Valley adjacent to and north of Wellesley Avenue, west of Progress Road, south of Forker Road and east of Bannen Road. Section 35 -26 -44 91 acres into 266 lots for single family dwellings Approval - Unanimous 3 -79, Prosser Addition - Extension of Time - Byers Agricultural Suburban to R -1 Located in the Spokane Valley in the southeast corner of the Intersection of Sinto Avenue and Woodlawn Road Section 15 -25 -44 1.77 acres into 5 lots for single family dwellings Approval - Unanimous 3. PN- 1056C -76, Peone Pines Estates 2nd Addition - Extension of Time - Devinco, Inc. ZN- 135A -76, Agricultural to R -1 Location: East of Newport Highway and Burlington Northern Railroad r/w and approximately 1 mile north of Mead along Mt. Spokane Drive 35 -27 -43 Proposal: 26.89 acres into 50 lots for single family dwellings Action: Approval - Unanimous AGENDA, January 29, 1981 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Thursday, January 29, 1981 - 9:00 A.M.(Item #1 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME PE- 1206 -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST ZE- 202 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO R -1 a. Location: Located in the Trentwood area of the Spokane Valley adjacent to and north of Wellesley Avenue, west of Progress Road, south of Forker Road and east of Bannen Road. b. Legal Description: Section 35, Township 26N, Range 44 EWN That portion of the NW 1/4 of Section 35, in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, lying SEIy of Forker Road and SWly of the power line easement as recorded on January 19, 1943, under Auditor's File No. 572309A; Also the E 1/2 of E 1/2 of SW 1/4 of said Section; And also that portion of the W 1/2 of the E 1/2 of said Section lying SWly of said power line easement; Except the Spokane Valley Land & Water Company's canal right -of -way; And except commencing at the SW corner of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said section; thence east along the south line of said section, a distance of 350 ft; thence north a distance of 933.42 ft; thence west a distance of 700 ft; thence south a distance of 933.42 ft. to the south line of said Section 35; thence east along the south line of said section a distance of 350 ft. to the point of beginning. And except Wellesley Avenue; And except that portion of the NW 1/4 of said section lying within Plat #4, West Farms Irrigated Tracts as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, Page 51. c. Sponsors: W.Main Corporation & TDC, Inc. E 12720 Nora Avenue E 12929 Sprague Avenue Spokane, WA. 99216 Spokane, WA. 99216 d. Engineer: I.P.E.C. E 12720 Nora Avenue Spokane, WA. 99216 e. Site Size: 91 acres f. Number of Lots: 266 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: R -1 j. Water Source: Trentwood Irrigation District #3 k. School District: East Valley #361 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tanks _ m. Environmental Impact: A proposed declaration of non - significance (a preliminary decision, which may be reversed, that an environmental impact statement, an EIS, is not needed) has been administratively issued. This in- sures the applicant of a timely processing of his /her proposal at the time of the public hearing. BUT, a major purpose of the public hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the 1 0 4 06 ''7 M Itv 2026 L; F F ' . II I. • S, S ".. 9 N i4 F (\ • ../\ 143 ia.. sae rc r ,: PLY 4. 3: 1 EL 204/2e PE- 1206 -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST decision makers with information as to whether or not a potential SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE impact upon the physical environment will result from implementation of the proposal, thus resulting in the need for an EIS. However, all "extensions of time" and most "change of conditions: are exempt from the provisions of SEPA; check with the Planning Department staff if uncertainty exists. n. Applicant is requesting a Time Extension until February 1, 1982. A.. L. EL 2041. c 1 0 I 4 S n 4- 0 PE 2 ^ a 4 91 AG East Valley Jr. High School WELL E 5LEY N —IA — • 1 1 "_ loco' East VaIIw :Nigh School! al w F. STAFF ANALYSIS - January 29, 1981 PE- 1206 -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST ZE- 202 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R -1) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. History The proposal was approved on January 30, 1979 by the Hearing Examiner Commit- tee and has been planned to be developed in phases. To date, no phases have been finalized, although the county departments are reviewing a submittal for phasing containing 86 lots. The sponsor is working with the school district in attempting to satisfy their concerns along with problems with FHA concern- ing the method of sewage disposal and economic conditions have delayed finali- zation of the first phase. The sponsor is therefore requesting a time exten- sion until February 1, 1982. B. Location The Trentwood area of the Spokane Valley, more specifically, adjacent to and north of Wellesley Avenue, west of Progress Road, south of Forker Road and east of Bannen Road. - C. Proposal 91 acres subdivided into 268 lots for single family use • Lot frontage = 80' - Lot sizes = 10,000 sq. ft. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION A. Circulation The County Road Engineer has not recommended any new conditions. Only those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record but have in- dicated this project is subject to the provisions and fee schedules of the Engineer's Department as adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on December 22, 1980. - B. Sewage Disposal Temporary use of individual on -site systems is- authorized until an area -wide sewerage system is available. .Dry sewerage lines are to be installed within the plat. C. Drainage (4 The County Engineer reports that the final construction plans must be reviewed and approved prior to the filing of the 'final plat. - 18 - STAFF ANALYSIS - January D. Water Supply The proposal is located within the recorded service area of.Trentwood Irriga- tion District #3. E. Fire Protection , 1981 SUMMERFIELD EAST - continued The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Fire Protection District # #1. F. Schools The proposal lies within the boundaries of East Valley School District #361. III. CONDITIONS: - If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. PLANNING DEPARTMENT - 1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record. 2. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting a time extension to review any preliminary plat approval. All extensions applied for may subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing Agencies. 3. That a time extension be granted to February 1, 1982. ENGINEER DEPARTMENT 1. This preliminary plat is subject to the provisions of Attachement "C" - Fee Schedule Office of the County Engineer - pursuant to Board of County Commis- sioners Resolution 180 -1592 of December 22, 1980. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The owner, his heirs and successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. 3. Any water service for this project shall be' provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. 4. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area -wide collection systems. - 1C - STAFF ANALYSIS - January , 1981 SUMMERFIELD EAST - continued 5. A dry sewer system is to be constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer have been reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. PD6e2 g td? erns c l ie-‘14x a- MAseivi qQ e& • Pla - t' - oppos;- tto, to Fe& Scheel/de ©4 uioa1c - 1D - GO"r✓1 D Icite 6K) PR?. AGENDA, January 29, 1981 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Thursday, January 29, 1981 - 9:00 A.M.(Item #1 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME PE- 1206 -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST ZE- 202 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO R -1 a. Location: Located in the Trentwood area of the Spokane Valley adjacent to and north of Wellesley Avenue, west of Progress Road, south of Forker Road and east of Bannen Road. b. Legal Description: Section 35, Township 26N, Range 44 EWN That portion of the NW 1/4 of Section 35, in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, lying SEIy of Forker Road and SWly of the power line easement as recorded on January 19, 1943, under Auditor's File No. 572309A; Also the E 1/2 of E 1/2 of SW 1/4 of said Section; And also that portion of the W 1/2 of the E 1/2 of said Section lying SWly of said power line easement; Except the Spokane Valley Land & Water Company's canal right -of -way; And except commencing at the SW corner of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said section; thence east along the south line of said section, a distance of 350 ft; thence north a distance of 933.42 ft; thence west a distance of 700 ft; thence south a distance of 933.42 ft. to the south line of said Section 35; thence east along the south line of said section a distance of 350 ft. to the point of beginning. And except Wellesley Avenue; And except that portion of the NW 1/4 of said section lying within Plat #4, West Farms Irrigated Tracts as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, Page 51. c. Sponsors: W.Main Corporation & TDC, Inc. E 12720 Nora Avenue E 12929 Sprague Avenue Spokane, WA. 99216 Spokane, WA. 99216 d. Engineer: I.P.E.C. E 12720 Nora Avenue Spokane, WA. 99216 e. Site Size: 91 acres f. Number of Lots: 266 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: R -1 j. Water Source: Trentwood Irrigation District #3 k. School District: East Valley #361 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tanks m. Environmental Impact: A proposed declaration of non - significance (a preliminary decision, which may be reversed, that an environmental impact statement, an EIS, is not needed) has been administratively issued. This in- sures the applicant of a timely processing of his /her proposal at the time of the public hearing. BUT, a major purpose of the public hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the 1 A 1a6 '47 139 2026 RK14. ACE 1 152 153 j EL Z04/2; PE- 1206 -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST decision makers with information as to whether or not a potential SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE impact upon the physical environment will result from implementation of the proposal, thus resulting in the need for an EIS. However, all "extensions of time" and most "change of conditions: are exempt from the provisions of SEPA; check with the Planning Department staff if uncertainty exists. n. Applicant is requesting a Time Extension until February 1, 1982. A..: EL 204/aj 0 ft a 2 S rF,vO r r r „et, , r 1 l .I I'I: 1 ?O6 -7L; JI A \G i t. yo 1 4 East East Valley Va Ilw J r. High ! :Nigh' School! School VVELLESLEY w ..... I f1 4jp later- office Communication Ts Spokane County Planning Department from.touat-y Jingt near' a nepa e0 Subject__ • PE 1206 Su®erfield East Resolution 80 -1592 of 22nd December, 1980. OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON pate January 8th. fit 81 The above referenced plat has been scheduled for an "Extension of Time Hearing" on January 29th , 1981. The County Engineer's Department has reviewed the plat and finds that the "Conditions of Approval" which were required by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner and /or the Board of County Commissioners are atilt applicable and should be required as a condition in granting the extension of time. The above referenced plat shall be.subject to the provisions of Attachment "C" - Fee Schedule Office of the County Engineer - pursuant to Board of County Commissioners later-office Communication To Spokane County Planning Department from.cwaty F ngl ripe r'v , Deparjjagp Subject PE 1206 Summerfield East Resolution 80 -1592 of'22nd December, 1980. OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER . SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date January_ 8th, e l,. 81 The above referenced plat has been scheduled for an "Extension of Time Hearing" on January 29th , 1981, The County Engineer's Department has reviewed the plat and finds that the "Conditions of Approval" which were required by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner and /or the Board of County Commissioners are still applicable and should be required as a condition in granting the extension of time. The above referenced plat shall,be,_.subject to the provisions of Attachment "C" - Fee Schedule Office of the County Engineer - pursuant to Board of County Commissioners N Transamerica 'Title 1 lsuranco Service Spokane County Planning Commission N. 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington Gentlemen: lions.nn,n,ica 1 illn Insn'nnco Cnny Notlh 720 Argonne Rona Spoknno, Washington 99200 (509) 922-2222 "THIRD CERTIFICATE TO PLAT Order No.:97855 -M LRECElV I 8PHLANt CUURT1 INGINU �. AUGO 61980 Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat of SUMMERFIELD EAST ADDITION In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of Spokane County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in Spokane County, to -wit: A parcel of land in the South half of Section 35, Township 26 North, Range . 44 E.W.M., being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the South quarter corner of Section 35; thence South 89 ° 52'00" West along the South line of the Southwest quarter of said Section and centerline of Wellesley Avenue as it now exists 60 ' feet in width a distance of 661.05 feet; thence 'North 00 ° 05'38". West, a distance of 30.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue and True Point of Beginning of this description; thence North 00 ° 05'38" West along the East boundary of PLAT NO. 4 OF WEST FARMS IRRIGATED TRACTS, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 51, a distance of 1121.63 feet; thence North 62 ° 23'41" East, a distance of 192.97 feet; thence North 40 ° 31'59" East, a distance of 48.01 feet; thence North 65 ° 56'49" East, a distance of 128.00 feet; thence South 46 ° 13'24" East, a distance of 114.31 feet; thence East a distance of 469.10 feet; thence North 79 ° 35'56" East, a distance of 133.39 feet; thence South 56 ° 39'30" East, a distance of 63.63 feet; thence North 74 ° 28'06 "' East, a distance of l28.00 thence South 13 ° 55'30" East, a. distance of 75.19 feet; thence South 89 ° 56'40" East, a distance of 36.43 feet; thence South 00 ° 03'20" West, a distance of 12.3.00 feet; thence South 36 ° 02'26" East, a distance of 54.45 feet; thence South 00 ° 03'20" West, a distance of 123.00 feet; thence South 89 ° 56'40" East, a distance of 375.09 feet; thence South.00 ° 25'19" West, a distance of 560.01 feet; thence North 89 ° 56'40" West, a distance of 342.67 feet; thence South 00 ° 03'20" West, a distance of 133.00 feet; thence South 06 ° 17'44" West, a distance of 44.26 feet; thence South 00 ° 03'20" West, a distance If of 143.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue, as it now exists 60 feet in width; thence North 89 ° 56'40" West along said Northerly margin a distance of 274.98 feet; thence North a distance of .903.42 feet; thence West a distance of 700.00 feet; thence South a distance of 903.90 feet to said Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue; thence South 89 ° 52'00" West along said Northerly margin a distance of 311.10 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. VESTED IN:�OLD NA=T= IONAL= BANK-OF= WASH=INGTON7 a national banking association, as Trustee under agreement withcFaye =S =E-11 ot.C' dated September 28, 1972 and MERCEDES ESKE, a married woman, as her sole and separate property. EXCEPTIONS Page 2 Order No. 97$55 -M THIRD CERT. TO PLAT. 1. General taxes for the year 1930 and prior years delinquent in the amount of $503.02 and $596.97, respectively, plus interest; including Weed District Tax and Fire Patrol Tax. (Parcel No. 35643 -9017) General . taxes for the year 1980 and prior years delinquent in the amounts of $471.49 and $559.67, respectively, plus interest; including Weed District Tax and Fire Patrol Tax. (Parcel No. 35644 -9024) 2. Assessments for the year 1980 de payable to Trentwood Irrigation plus Treasurer's Fee. (Parcel No Assessments for the year 1980 de payable to Trentwood Irrigation plus Treasurer's Fee. (Parcel No (continued) linquent in the District No. 3, . 35643 -9017) linquent in the District No. 3, . 35644 -9024) amount of $231.00 plus interest, amount of $217.00 plus interest, rn i 3. Liability tb future assessments by Trentwood Irrigation District . No. 3. 4. Reservation of mineral rights by Northern Pacific Railway in Deed dated September 1, 1883 and recorded October 20, 1886 as. Document No. 946, as follows: Reserving and excepting from said lands such as are now known or shall hereafter be ascertained to contain coal or iron, and also the use of such surface ground as may be necessary for mining operations; and the right of access to such reserved and excepted coal and iron lands for the purpose of exploring, developing and working the same. 5. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described, as granted by Deed recorded as Document No. 432623. 6. Easements over and across said property for constructing and maintaining telephone and electric power lines disclosed by Document No. 324569. 7. EASEMENT AND TILE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantee: Trentwood Irrigation Distr.i,ct No. 3: Purpose: Underground pipeline of the district for the transportation and delivery of water, of a size not to exceed 12 inches in diameter Dated: January 12, 1966 Recorded: .January 17, 1966 Recording No.: 171591C :8. CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Seller: Old National Bank of Washington, a national banking association, as Trustee under agreement witi Faye S. Elliott dated September 28, 1972, and Mercedes Jeske, a married woman as her sole and . separate property Purchaser: The_W.._Ma:Ln= Corporation, a Washington corporation, as to anundivided 50% interest, an:d= T,.,D,.C Inc). a Washington corporation, as to an undivided 50% interest Dated: April 2, 1979 Recorded: April 6, 1979 Recording No.: 7904060363 Records examined to July 28, ,1980 'at A. TRAN AME ICA (TITI L' INSURANCE COMPANY cc: IPEC By: Page 3 Order No. 97855 -M THIRD CERT. TO PLAT ./ w: �: l' 3G= iC .....•r+�:a- �..c. rew�: wu� .Tsr.vuan if 2 9 OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date - Tan ag,e y /s , 19 Infer - office Communicotioa To Spokane County Planning Department From County Engineer's Department Subject PE I'LOL SIAYY.1Yle EA • The above referenced plat has been scheduled for an "Extension of Time Hearing" o 19 90 . The County Engineer's Department has reviewed' the plat and finds that the "Conditions for Approval" which were required by the Spokane 1 County Hearing Examiner and /or the Board of County Commissioners are still applicable and should be required as a condition in granting the extension of time ;Tau y 29 OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date 37wan /5 Inter- office Communication To_ syokang County Planning Department From County Engineer's Department Subject P E 120(0 S,4 vnrnerCiek EA St The above referenced plat has been scheduled for an "Extension of Time Hearing" on ' t I , 19 90 . The County Engineer's Department has reviewed the plat and finds that the "Conditions for Approval" which were required by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner and /or the Board of County Commissioners are still applicable and should be required as a condition in granting the extension of time. • Transamenca Title Insurance Services RECn0VU 1 JUN 2 9 1978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Gentlemen: That portion of 26 North, Range That portion of North, Range 414 Transamerica Title Insurance Company North 720 Argonne (load Spokane, Washington 99206 (509) 922-2222 CERTIFICATE TO PLAT Spokane County Planning Commission N 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of Spokane County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to.the following described land situate in Spokane County, to -wit: the Northwest quarter of Section 44 E. W. M., lying Southeasterly the Northeast quarter of Section E. W. M., lying Southwesterly of AND EXCEPT Wellesley Avenue; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. (continued) Order No.: 89812 -M Certificate for Filing Propos Plat/of SUMMERFIELD EAST 35, Township of Forker Road; 35, Township 26 Progress Road; The East half of the East half of the Southwest quarter and the West half of the Southeast quarter of Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 E. W. M., lying Westerly of Progress Road; EXCEPT the right of way for a canal of the Spokane Valley Land & Water Company; AND EXCEPT commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section; thence in an Easterly direction along the South line of said Section, a distance of 350 feet; thence due North, a distance of 933.42 feet; thence West a distance of 700 feet; thence due South a distance of 933.42 feet to the South line of Section 35, Township and range aforesaid; thence in an Easterly direction along the South line of said Section, a distance of 350 feet to the place of beginning; VESTED IN: (continued) Page 2 Order No. 89812 -M OLD NATIONAL BANK as Trustee under Faye S. Elliott living Trust dated September 28, 1972, as her separate property and MERCEDES JESKE, as her separate property EXCEPTIONS: 1. 17„ excise tax, if unpaid. 2. General taxes for the last half of 1978 in the amount of $30.31, including Weed District Tax (Parcel No. 35641 -9049) General taxes for the last half of 1978 in the amount of $198.98, including Weed District Tax (Parcel No. 35644 -9050) General taxes for the last half of 1978 in the amount of $205.07 including Weed District Tax (Parcel No. 35643 -9017) 3. Assessments for the last half of 1978 in the amount of $35.32 to Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3. Assessments for the last half of 1978 in the amount of $41.47 to Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3. Assessments for the last half of 1978 in the amount of $181.77 to Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3. Assessments for the last half of 1978 in the amount of $155.69 to Trentwood District No. 3. 4. Liability to future assessments by Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3. 5. Reservation of mineral rights by Northern Pacific Railway in Deed dated September 1, 1883 and recorded October 20, 1886 as Document No. 946, as follows: Reserving and excepting from said lands such as are now known, or shall hereafter be ascertained to contain coal or iron, and also the use of such surface ground as be necessary for mining operations; and the right of access to such reserved and excepted coal and iron lands for the purpose of exploring, developing and working the same. 6. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described, as granted by Deed recorded as Document No. 432623. 7. Easements over and across said property for constructing and maintaining telephone and electric power lines disclosed by Document No. 324569. Page 3 Order No. 89812 -M 8. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantee: The United States of America Purpose: Electric power transmission lines and one or more telephone and /or telegraph lines with right to clear right -of -way and keep clear of brush, timber, inflammable structures, and fire hazards with right to remove danger trees Dated: August 25, 1942 Recorded: January 19, 1943 Recording No.: 572309A 9. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantee: Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3 Purpose: Underground pipeline of the district for the transportation and delivery of water, of a size not exceeding 12 inches in diameter Dated: January 12, 1966 Recorded: January 17, 1966 Recording No.: 171591C 10 UNRECORDED CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Seller: Old National Bank of Washington, a national banking association, as trustee pursuant to that certain written Trust entitled "Living Trust of Faye S. Elliott" dated September 28, 1972 and Mercedes Jeske, as her separate property Purchaser: Keith D. Rieckers and Katherine A. Rieckers, husband and wife, and Ronald P. Douglas and Vicki L. Douglas, husband and wife, and Paul A. Bastine and Janet E. Bastine, husband and wife Dated: March 15, 1977 Disclosed by: PURCHASER'S ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT AND DEED AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: (as to an undivided one - quarter interest) Grantor: Keith D. Rieckers and Katherine A. Rieckers, husband and wife, and Ronald P. Douglas and Vicki L. Douglas, husband and wife, and Paul A. Bastine and Janet E. Bastine, husband and wife Grantee: Kenneth J. Tupper and Sharon L. Tupper, husband and wife Dated: October 5, 1977 Recorded: October 24, 1977 Recording No.: 7710240085 Said document affects a portion of herein described property (continued) 11. Right, title or interest of Timothy L. Martin and Myra Martin, husband and wife as disclosed by Financing Statement recorded as Document No. 7512050072 and by Documend No. 7409180053, copies attached. NOTE 1: A Power of Attorney recorded April 17, 1974, sufficient in form to authorize a conveyance or mortgage of the herein described property was recorded as Document No. 7404170016, executed by Sharon L. Tupper and Kenneth J. Tupper. NOTE 2: General taxes for the year 1978 have been paid in full in the amount of $10.16, including Fire Patrol Tax and Weed District Tax (Parcel No. 35642 -9049) -.•GQ.: IPEC Copies attached kk 4' By: Phyl3is Vaughan Title Officer Records examined to June 20, 1978 at 8:00 A. M. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Page 4 Order No. 89812 -M • AGENDA, January 29, 1980 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Tuesday, January 29, 1980 - 9:00 A.M. (Item #B on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME E I (PE -1206 78, SUMMERFIELD EAST ZE-202-784 AGRICULTURAL TO R -I a. Location: Located in the Trentwood area of the Spokane Valley adjacent to and north of Wellesley Avenue, west of Progress Road, south of Forker Road and east of Bannen Road. b. Legal Description: Section 35, Township 26N, Range 44 E.W.M. That portion of the NW 1/4 of Section 35, in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, lying SEIy of Forker Road and SWIy of the power line easement as recorded on January 19, 1943, under Auditor's File No. 572309A; Also the E 1/2 of E 1/2 of SW 1/4 of said Section; And also that portion of the W 1/2 of the E 1/2 of said Section lying SWly of said power line easement; Except the Spokane Valley Land & Water Company's canal right -of -way; And Except commencing at the SW corner of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said section; th. E along the S line of said section, a distance of 350 ft; th. N a distance of 933.42 ft; th. W a distance of 700 ft; th. S a distance of 933.42 ft. to the south line of said Section 35; th. E along the S line of said section a distance of 350 ft. to the point of beginning. And Except Wellesley Avenue; And Except that portion of the NW 1/4 of said section lying within Plat #4, West Farms Irrigated Tracts as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, Page 51. c. Sponsor: W. Main Corporation E 12720 Nora Avenue Spokane, WA. 99216 d. Engineer: Inland Pacific Engineering & Construction Corp. E 12720 Nora Avenue Spokane, WA. 99216 e. Site Size: 91 acres f. Number of Lots: 266 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: R - j. Water Source: Trentwood Irrigation District #3 k. School District: East Valley #361 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tanks m. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197 -10 -530 (2) provides that: " In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." n. The applicant is requesting an Extension of Time on approval until February 1, 1981 2 Its SIC 1 n E NOv FQ 1 etd- r -r EL 20 41 11 R N a lib RYI i 1 n . G r 2 2026 - 2A - 1. [U`1 A SIL pOLLILI�� I -1206 ya 91 AG East Volley J r. High Sch00l E Vo Hwy i liigh 9cho° w 1 1" :1000 ■ i STAFF ANALYSIS - January 29, 1980 PE- 1206 -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST ZE- 202 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. History The proposal was approved on January 30, 1979 by the Hearing Examiner Committee. The proposal was planned to be developed in phases. To date, no phases have been finalized. The first phase surveying drafting have been completed as have road sewer and water plans. No physical construction has begun as plans have not received final approval. The project sponsor indicates that progress to date has been chiefly delayed by the 208 study and the need to develop new drainage plans. Also, current economic considerations have slowed finalization. B. Location The Trentwood area of the Spokane Valley adjacent to and north of Wellesley Avenue, west of Progress Road, south of Barker Road and east of Bannen Road. C. Proposal • • 91 acres subdivided into 268 lots for single family use Lot frontage = 80' • Lot sizes = 10,000 sq. ft. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION A. Circulation The County Road Engineer has not recommended any new conditions. Only those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record. B. Sewage Disposal Temporary use of individual on -site systems is authorized until an area -wide sewerage system is available. Dry sewerage lines will be installed within the plat. C. Drainage The County Utilities Engineer reports that the final construction plans plans must be reviewed and approved prior to the filing of the final plat. D. Water Supply The proposal is located within the recorded service area of Trentwood Irrigation District #3. - 2B - STAFF ANALYSIS - January Z m 1980 sENMERFIELD EAST - continued E. Fire Protection The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Fire District #1. F. Schools The proposal lies within the boundaries of East Valley School District #361. III. CONDITIONS: If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. 1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record. 2. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting a time extension to review any preliminary plat approval. All extensions applied for may subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing Agencies. 3. That a time extension be granted to February 1, 1981. I. 2; cti Art A (jfl --s. Pe c _ 160 7 6 ea- — %P.es in t eU6 \ovetl- . CKP Eck '1' r IE p (6A tattle E) 3 - 4 to s 2C - AGENDA, January 30, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456. -22Q5 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Tuesday, January 30, 1979 , 8:30 A.M. (Item No. 6 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE- 1206 -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST ZE- 202 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL a. Location: Located in the Trentwood area of the Spokane Valley adjacent to and north of Wellesley Avenue, west of Progress Road, south of Forker Road and east of Bannen Road. b. Legal Description: Section 35, Township 26N, Range 44 E.W.M. That portion of the NW 1/4 of Section 35, in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, lying SEIy of Porker Road and SWIy of the power line easement as recorded on January 19, 1943 under Auditor's File No. 572309A; Also the E 1/2 of E 1/2 of SW 1/4 of said section; And Also that portion of the W 1/2 of the E 1/2 of said Section lying SWly of said power line easement, Except the Spokane Valley Land & Water Companyts canal right -of -way; And Except commencing at the SW corner of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said section; thence E along the S line of said section, a distance of 350 feet; thence N, a distance of 933.42 feet; thence W a distance of 700 ft; thence S a distance of 933.42 feet to the S line of said Section 35; thence E along the S line of said section, a distance of 350 feet, to the point of beginning. And Except Wellesley Avenue; And Except that portion of the NW 1/4 of said section lying within Plat ,Y4, West Farms Irrigated Tracts as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 51. c. Sponsor: William W. Main E 12720 Nora Avenue Spokane, WA. 99216 d. Surveyor: Milton T. Booth E 12720 Nora Avenue Spokane, WA. 99216 e. Site Size: 91 acres f. Number of Lots: 268 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: Single'Family Residential j. Water Source: Trentwood Irrigation District #3 k. School District: East Valley 1361 1. Method of Sewage Disposal; Individual septic tanks m. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. An Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared and circulated for public response and comments. A copy of the document is a available for public inspection at the Spokane County Public Library, Valley Branch, E 12004 Main, or at the Spokane County Planning Department, Broadway Centre Building, N 721 Jefferson. Coro. ZG Qe IEw Sort..--+ Pa- a 7 Dew ipae ca✓ �• Fv - 6 - reef- r✓ me Sioewauc; rot ParilAJa l (OVER FVAAP fl > r ,Q- O.�„✓ ALFA , 0 0 • > a , N 0 E 2(84 PE- 1206 -7i3 ass 91 AC W East R Vol ley 0 r. High IT School East Valley i School s nk W P. 26 STAFF ANALYSIS - January 30, 1979 PE- 1206 -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST ZE- 202 -78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE CLASSIFICATIONS I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Location B. Proposal C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan - 6B- This preliminary plat has had an Environmental Impact Statement prepared for it. The Final Environmental Impact Statement was published as of January 8, 1979. The purpose of the Environmental Impact Statement is to provide a maximum amout of information to the decision makers. Any unmitigated, adverse impact identified in the statement, including review commentary in response to the draft impact statement, can be considered grounds of the Hearing Examiner to condition or deny the proposal, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.060. The site is located in the Spokane Valley near the Trentwood area. It is adjacent to and north of Wellesley Avenue, west of Progress Road, south of Forker Road and east of Bannen Road. • 91 acres subdivided into 268 lots for single family use which includes 3 one-acre parcels along Forker Road. ▪ Typical lot frontage = 80' - Typical lot size = 10,000 sq. ft. - Lots per gross acre = 2.9 The approved map of the Comprehensive Plan indicates residential usage of this area, as well as all nearby surrounding lands, with no density designation. D. Land Use Analysis: 1. Existing Land Uses (see page 39, D.E.I.S.) The site is level land at the base of the North Spokane Valley wall and is cultivated with crops that include wheat, barley and hay. In the center of the proposed plat and adjacent to Wellesley Avenue is the Trentwood Elementary School grounds. To the sough across Wellesley there are several residential subdivisions including: Kings' 11,000 sq. ft. lots, Kruger's 14,000 sq. ft. lots and Fitzpatrick's with less than 10,000 sq. ft. lots. Directly south of the Trentwood School site is the East Valley Baptist Church and further south to Trent there are a variety of land uses including small acreage tracts, mobile homes, residences and commercial uses. STAFF ANALYSIS - January 30, 1979 SUMMERFIELD EAST - continued East of the proposed plat along Wellesley is the East Valley Junior High and the Trentwood Irrigation District well. Further east is the East Valley High School and beyond that within i mile of the proposed plat, is the Wellesley Manor Subdivision with 11,000 to 12,000 sq. ft. lots. Land use north and northeast include: The Bonneville Power Right -of -Way, larger acreage parcels under cultivation and widely scattered hillside residences associated with various farming uses. To the west there are parcels utilized for farming and along Barmen Road residential subdivisions such as: Pace Addition 14,500 sq. ft. lots, Alexander's 40,000 sq. ft. lots, Curry One 15,000 sq. ft. lots and Swan Acres with 17,000 sq. ft. lots. Directly west of this proposal is the West Farms Tract No. 4 plat proposal with 11,700 sq. ft. lots which is to be heard by the Hearing Examiner on this agenda. 2. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses This proposal appears to be generally compatible with other subdivisions that have occurred in the immediate area, although for the most part, the lot sizes appear to be smaller than those that have been approved north of Wellesley. It should also be noted that urban density developments can be expected near school sites and if these development trends continue, any conflicts that exist between this plat and present uses would decrease over time. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION Those items normally covered by the staff within this section of the staff analysis have been addressed in the Summerfield East E.I.S. That document will be retained in the plat file as an official part of this analysis. III. ZONING ANALYSIS The site is presently zoned Agricultural and the sponsor is proposing all 268 lots for single family residential zoning. Although there will be some conflicts with present agricultural activities, the staff feels that due to the proximity of the schools and arterials, development pressures in the area, and the intended uses of the proposal the change to single family zoning would be appropriate. (Refer page 41, D.E.I.S.) IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (Reference the Summerfield East E.I.S.) V. CONDITIONS If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated separately and listed hereafter 1. That the plat be designated as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and /or attached sheets as noted. -6c- STAFF ANALYSIS - January , 1979 SUMMERFIELD L..aT - continued 2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one 'dwelling structure be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. 3. That the plat provide for right of way width for streets as indicated on the preliminary plat of record. 4. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) 5. That appropriate street names be indicated. 6. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 7. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. 8. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the filing of the final plat. 9. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to February 1, 1980. -6D- STAFF ANALYSIS - January 3b, 1979 SUMMERFIELD EAST - continued 10. That a declaration of Non - Significance be issued, in accordance with Section 11.15.340 of the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO) prior to approval of this recommendation by the Board of County Commissioners, or that any approving action in accordance with SCEO 11.15.340. NOTE: The official file contains an environmental checklist for the proposal and a staff review of their checklist as required by WAC 197 -10 -320. 11. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the dedication of right of way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat by the County Engineer. 12. That plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. 13. The drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. 14. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who shall be responsible for perpetuating all evidence of the location of survey monuments which may be distrubed during construction and who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 15. No construction work is to be performed with the Public Right of Way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 16. All construction within the Public Right of Way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost or construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines, shall be filed with the County Engineer. 17. No direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads. 18. Road design, rough grading construction, and drainage control for 1 rights of ways and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the developer. 19. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 20. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the proposed water district. - 6E - STAFF ANALYSIS - January ., 1979 SUMMERFIELD t.nST - continued Special Conditions 21. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution No. 77 -1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Board of County Commissioners, with regard to the preliminary plat approval; as instructed by the Planning Department staff. 22. That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning be reclassified to Single Family Residential. 23. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting a time extension to review any preliminary plat approval. 24. That a public water system serviced by Trentwood Irrigation District #3, and including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. 25. That an on -site sewage management system be created and approved by the Health Office prior to the signing of the final plat, if more than a total of 318 dwelling units are authorized within the plat. 26. That final construction plans for on -site storm drainage facilities be reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer and the County Health District. 27. The dedicatory language of the plat will state that each lot is authorized the use of an individual on -site sewage disposal system. 28. That all public roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifi- cations of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. 29. That no direct access be allowed from lots to Wellesley Avenue and Progress Road and Forker Road. 30. That the owner dedicate 20 feet additional right -of -way along Forker Road. 31. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at Progress Road. Design standards for neighborhood collection arterial should be used. 32. That the sponsor provide 50 foot radius cul -de -sac rights -of -way. 33. That the sponsor County Engineer, Wellesley Avenue. 34. That the sponsor of Tract 103 and provide sidewalks along pathway routes as designated by the and shown on the preliminary plat of record, and along provide stub road connections, to the west, to access center south line of Tract 113 in West Farms Irrigated Tracts. - 6F - Plat Hearing Examiner Committee Actions of January 30, 1979 PS- 1257 -78 Z5- 194 -78, Location: Proposal: Action: Additional 6. - 1206 -78, ZE- 202 -78 Location: Proposal: Action: Additional 7. PE- 1249 -78 ZE- 190 -78, Location: Proposal: Action: Additional ■ 5. , Meenach- Carpenter Addition - T.J. Meenach, Jr. Agricultural Suburban to Agricultural Suburban or Single- Family Residential and Two - Family Residential South of the City of Spokane at the SE corner of Crestline Street and 55th Avenue 4.4 acres into 13 lots for single family dwellings and duplexes Approved - Unanimously Conditions: - Delete Condition #s 18, 19 and 25 from Staff Analysis - Dry Sewerage lines and double plumbing required - Will not protest public sewer construction ummerfield East - William W. Main Agricultural to Single - Family Residential Trentwood area of the Spokane Valley adjacent to and north of Wellesley Avenue, west of Progress Road, south of Forker Road and east of Bannen Road 91 acres into 268 lots for single family dwellings Approved - Unanimously Conditions: - 6 foot wide sidewalks within the project and along Progress and Wellesley Avenue - 6 ft. chainlink fence along 900 feet of the west bound ,pry and around the proposed flood retainage basin - Dry sewerage lines and double plumbing - Insure that Progress Road is protected from flooding - All stub roads to be barricaded - Park money donated to the County be spent within two -mile radius of the proposal - Construction will be monitored by S.C.A.P.A. and limited from 7:00 a.m. to 6:OOp.m. , Greenhouse Addition - Ralph Guthrie Agricultural to Agricultural and Agricultural Suburban East central portion of the Spokane Valley adjacent to and north of 6th Avenue and adjacent to Long Road 3.61 acres into 9 lots for single family dwellings Approved - unanimously Conditions: - That a 4 foot high chainlink fence be provided and constructed, by the sponsor, on the north property line of the plat prior to any finalizing of any phase of this project. - That Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 and Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 be combined into two lots along 6th Avenue - That no lot access be allowed to 6th Avenue - 2 - jr PEC IFIC ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION Spokane County Engineer's Office N. 811 Jefferson St. Spokane, Washington 99201 DATE: July 30, 1979 PROJECT: SUMMERFIELD EAST ADDITION ATTENTION: Mr. Jerry Sims Gentlemen: We are sending herewith copies of the following: TO: NUMBER OF COPIES AND DESCRIPTION Specifications Preliminary Plat Site Plans Detail Drawings 1 Final Plat Inspection Reports Contract Documents Plot Plans Reports Legal Descriptions Color Schemes Boundary Survey Renderings Road Plan & Profiles FOR YOUR: xInformation x Approval x Files x Review REMARKS: Please begin process of review and checking of this final plat, SUMMERFIELD EAST ADDITION. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION _Jw 1 i1/. Eric W. Calkins Encls. Signature Distribution C . EAST 12720 NORA AVE.. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99216 • 1509) 922 -1300 / ]C PEC NLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING ANI) CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION TO: DATE: May 24, 1979 Spokane County Engineer's Office North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99201 PROJECT: SUMMERFIELD EAST ATTENTION: Mr. Gary Kennaly Gentlemen: We are sending herewith copies of the following: NUMBER OF COPIES AND DESCRIPTION Specifications 1 Preliminary Plat Site Plans Detail Drawings Final Plat Inspection Reports Contract Documents Plot Plans Reports Legal Descriptions Color Schemes Boundary Survey Renderings Road Plan & Profiles FOR YOUR: la Information XX Files Approval Signature Review Distribution REMARKS: Please note the lot revision that became necessary due to some problems discovered in the field; i.e., location of 10" WAN: and more detailed topo information. If you have any questions or problems with the revisions, please call. Sincerely, INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION Patrick J. oore Survey Coordinator Encls. EAST 12720 NORA AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99216 • 15091 922 -1300 TO: SPOFANC CuUrvry COURT mOU SL SUBJECT: Draft EIS Review of Summerfield East Section 4. Transportation /Circulation OFYICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER SPo►8.LVE ,WtShIINtflON 9920 • December 5, 1978 Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Director Planning Department FROM: Gary Kennaly, Planning & Traffic Division Enginee OIC, ,Spokane County Engineer's Office We have completed our review and analysis of the Draft EIS and offer the following comments for your consideration. 1. Trent Avenue should be identified as SR 290 because it is a State Highway and is under the jurisdiction of the State Department of Transportation -- not the County Road Department. 2. In addition to the arterials mentioned in the Draft, Forker Road and Progress Road are designated arterials, adjacent to and pro- viding direct access to the proposed development but not mentioned in this portion of the Draft. 3. Due to operational and geometric characteristics of Forker Road, additional right of way dedication and construction of left turn facilities may be required to mitigate possible traffic safety hazards from traffic entering this proposed development from Forker Road. 4. Same statement as #3 only referring to Progress Road. 5. Same statement as #3 only referring to Wellesley Road. 6. No mention as to impacts or provisions for pedestrian and /or biker facilities on roads proposed in the plat. Sidewalks on neigh- borhood collector arterials are required and will partially address pedestrian facilities. To date the neighborhood collector arterials contained in this plat proposal have not been designated. Page 2 . Fred Dayharsh Draft EIS Review of Summerfield East ye 7. Pedestrian and /or biker facilities were not addressed for existing arterials of Forker Road, Progress Road and Wellesley Avenue which are all adjacent to the proposed development and which does pro- vide access to students traveling to the elementary, junior and high schools in the immediate vicinity of the proposal. REQUEST FOR DESIGN UEVIATIUN - ROAD NAME 'Wabash Avenue DATE November 27, 1984 CRP /RID /PLAT /2.C. No. PE- 1206 -78 FEDERAL /STATE PROJECT NO. PROJECT TITLE Summerfield East PROJECT LIMITS Sec 35 -26 - v EXISTING CONDITIONS: ROAD WIDTH 36' ROAD SURFACE asjhalt AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC Current PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT: no change . PROJECT DESCRIPTION First finalized plat in an approved preliminary plat of 266 lots. DESCRIPTION OF STANDARD INVOLVED Condition 35 of original & Order "that the stub roads to the wert s �rricaded ,by Tie - Sponsor, in -a fashion acceptable to the Spokane County Engineer" which would require a guard rail barricade per S -10 through 12,. under. present__standards.._.____. _ PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION We propose that ;-inste u Lhe yuard rail barricade / a STX -toot high chain link tence be the barrier. JUSTIFICATION --- As condition 42 5T pre'fiminary pTafirTIM ngrari -order, the plat sponsor was also required to build a six foot high chain link tence along a portion of the west boundary of the project. This fence has been built; the Southerly end of said farce is on the centerline of Wabash at the west end of the street. Extending the fence south 18.00 feet to the South curb line of the street would complete . ----- an an d.equate barrier at such less cost. A 15u toot long Street noes not require ... _ a heavy harrier guard rail for safety reasons. ._. no change tEI CabiLVAmo Submitted By l . Date Inland Pack i nraari Design Year STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS _ C4JZi ni4e.. _ _77:tLE fent Approved Not Approved 111 - Fewict: E •LC_ At/ CgoeitdD cia "ore – -r OC o er )Lcrc, ttnveC S/M/I r /2,0a.D C-A s ez0 hct t Az-re...10 n c /20 an . 00-0 cex3-1 ottr- be elicrn w ,r,4 • t."2 Ark," sivwca dA-Pa Cia0 teat ac retnea•n C C I ", (can, Or •24) eO C/o ed,€Or / Approved Not Approved APk Ve cl‘ q• k-aril re•it _ 7) . - ±Re — tau 0, Se ction Engineer Date -r4 DrVlsion Engineer. C../Dace erc We I Les H N Lu 1 cP7(o s I k �( 3 Lac` az)-`-I 3 c. 3 b 3 31,19 ( -ess Legal Advertising ' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, by 1114 Spokane County Planning Commission that a public hearing will be held at 9 :a o'clock S Cou February. . COl Ea141 Jefferso d eld st •I mission Hearing Room lo at Nor bad a Planners Okay Spokane County's Hearing Examiner Committee for subdivisions Jan. 30 approved developer William Main's plan for 268 homes on 91 acres wrapped. around Trentwood elementary school. To be located west of Progress and south of the Forker- Progress junction to Wellesley, the plan is called Summerfield East. The subdivision is expected to put more than 250 children into the East Valley School District, within walking distance of an already filled school. south side of Wellesley, west of Ormond. The denial, was issued without prejudice. The qualification means the sponsor, Les Waggoner, 1514 Greenacres, can resubmit a modified plan as if it were a new proposal. answer for that problem. He Burglars Get has agreed to pay the East Valley School District and H ome Items Spokane County Parks Department more than $100 per lot in the subdivision for the costs to acquire land for new schools and parks. The full Planning Com- mission already has voted a recommendation to the Washington State Legislature that it provide enabling legislation for counties to demand from developers some sort of fee in lieu of land dedication for future parks and schools. In addition to the money, developers of the project have said they will install a holding drain at the northern end of the subdivi- sion. ' other Spokane Valley subdivisions were considered by the conunittee at its Jan. 30 meeting. BUT MAIN had his own . pond for g a a • TENNIS S. Stanley, E13105 28th, Jan. 28 reported a color television, video games, and tapes valued at $2,000 taken from his home. Marilyn L. Hainsworth, N3010 Locust, Feb. 1 reported , Spokan Washing o 99460, s ffollows: to Code, Se onsr tion 4,03 0 amending 40'155) Spoka, Count 55. Street Public: "Public Streit, THE COMMITTEE ap Ib a edia%a ar public proved Greenhouse Addition;'b used f mpr ?es Ralph Guthrle'S plan for 9 j •namtained by the cou Roa o epe . m ent or for which asonal homes on 3.61- acres on the ,assurances g have uar b ee een t he s pr otreevided to ' southwest corner of 6th and ' I m I County to p,oved t i Provided however approval se hi abpve m re r a in9re a p homes on 9.6 acres on the e egress access f .' inorceughfa abutting proper a pse N C HEREBY GIVEN, Spokane kane Planning Comm e thatcpoe 16thidawill a held in the Spon the kane County Planning in Hearing Room located at 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washl 99260, to consider amending the Sr County Hearing Examiner Com Ordinance as follows: Reace SECTION 3. SUBMISSION plications on forms a appro■ resolution 01 the Board for peel subdivision plats and zone rec cations shall be submitted and C, complete by the applicant and 81 by either the Platting Administr Zoning Administrator, respective Hearing Examiner Committee I Shall be based on the applicatio': has been submitted and C D om p'tre ete e by the the Pla applic a d n min t and is9 e Y A Burglars last week took I Zoning Ce5. Hea ord $2,500 worth of hand tools and I wbStargeseMc si r. house furnishings from a mm o e as y s ep0 nd home that had just been built by the p Administrator at 54126 Terre-Verde. Adam en'/ the � msira propos tor, al re out p v Roger A. Biddiscombe direct that a new application md Pl anning Depar' reported Jan. 27 th a tool box 11 ine H rthin 9 na E a m pprruoosa« and tools, chandelier, lamps d o t tae ' a b ut n ort f s u s stanttlall and a trash compactor were age11r 01 iuriSmion ave ma ke whatever ndat h taken from the home. ke,to review changes make r u the ha the cha Fred C. Arthur, E13106 Heari seem ng ecassa Eminer rsuaN to Commit Heroy, Jan. 29 reported $277 and dd . pu to SECTION 1, AP' T worth of ski gear taken from HE ER RO OF COUNTY his garage. Listed as stolen nB e anC eC O r aer l e ath were one pair of skis, form reCO,mn me Hearing Exami: cores, bindings, boots and sion me shat I be mrinade g. par a of me the B6. , that hea nites s t that a proposed apply r I Iminary p a poles.. 1 or none recta t i io County Standards ll ' es ve a County R., ver. , "Public Str' They denied t shall mean that at the option of Waggoner 1st Addition, C ounty i form Enginereeen r either that clef?: provided by the Spokane County app roved t) R lS ons Pursua Plat Subdivision rdinance or cc road pe es b ee n su bsla Bally • design, eensity, align wastewater disposal. the 01' 4 take the appropriate action the or proceessing the a Planning ew pp. me d p p lat or Zone reel& has preliminary e ran been ttak changed but not subs u tsha 11 t tak ton sai unl all no agencies e act it juris on r ' j cniinge5 malt and make SPORANL COUNT', COURTHOUSE Grading Surfacing Drainage �1� Other /i/one.'nrn (zo) Rerrit- a.It (/) f @mai r'D 1L k-.►'1X i+1, t( v'(( TIVIEr CIFYZOIf (Jr COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER Sa'oi mar: ,Witsi INOTON 99260 - 6 /998 Subdivision Name: ate, ry„,e e/I Sa_s't- ,°E /ZO(o Dear Sir: One of the requirements set forth by the Spokane County Planning Commission in connection with the above titled plat involves the filing with this office of a Street Improvement Bond. A preliminary inspection of the plat has been made by this office and the amount of the Street Improvement Bond found to be as follows: AMOUNT OF STREET IMPROVEMENT BOND $ So 3 o oo ° 2 A Street Improvement Bond in the above amount must be filed with this office prior to approval of the final plat. The bond will be released only upon satisfactory completion of the required street improvement. Please contact this office when work on the improvement is ready for inspection, or if you desire additional information or advice concerning the work. Yours very truly, Robert S. Turner, P.E. County Engineer By %l 1 Quantity Price Cost Co •letio % Precast Drywell- Std. Precast Drywel l - Dbl. Backfil1 for DW . Concrete Inlet 3 - C/y1Ppipe ' W il Dia.. z FA. 70 O - / UOa /& oo _._ x-' I ?4'= 4 ' 1 3 ' EA 10( 7 7y c.y.. r . (, -5 34>5 /a o 8 - 3R5 -650 fr 1t3 . Qsb 55 5 - cmPpipe /0 Dia. j:qN lo Igya ' . ' ' pipe Dia. ' g 7 �'60a� pipe Dia. Precast Manhole Ditch Excavation = 3S;; yak Yft, R. 35 , t )Sa7,21! Sod = I 9 - E-04f. f / 9 '51.7•) _or�cReke 14 e— Went it < v'x 1 .35��9 = ' y�:a r - c i Sub Total Contingencies TOTAL Drainage x/ c e x :Ici � -/s /gees 2.0 4271112_ 4ny -- y101. Std. . Page Dwl Bdl. Dwl . Dwl BKF. /60.- Conc. Inlet / 'Dia. —Pipe; S' Dia. t. — FTp e yQ 6' 2y Dia .CO1COTHER-1) Pip J34Q L GJAL A 9- a- 'wso . J tki • .1300. ./33G - off 2 - Liz—_. -; W 0 _. _._ x-' I ?4'= 4 ' 1 3 ". / 7 • R. a� 0 (,_5 gt)'. / ' _\ 0 ( . * , 7 a' /a o 8 - 4 / „ aq6' id y' . Qsb 55 5 i c- s0 2 , e' c• /_a' � .. - 3 as °= 6 0 iota 5 0 2.0 O Li a -)• ' 1 s 74 0 sr i 9LI • t o 6o' PROJECT SOMnneRFiELo EAST NAME T NcLSO1�1 DATE 8 /I/ 30 INSPECTOR DATE • .vecoTios BOARD (Jr .adams. • • 7,OZ • l'i2.28 4e1 itai. • „. '•,. , r • , -a• th. f A . At datatim, Aar: -•; . A .. • •;.11.,itsyrzoga,311,p. • - koo.kh k'118. •• • • P freitonaep. i• • ; 11 Ctacttutity,97n.. • :••• ';•‘: 111 )51R‘&51.111I 20Uliti:1061CLIO2104112L.OF,proltaS COUBT1, STATB Or . WLIF.EiGION. 1 .- . 1c.: '. 9 --' /? — '' , . . , It the .matter orthe Vacation ofithe:ionelie et "Rotate Leo iaza ' ",:' JIORDBIt..VAC11,11:KI PLAT. 7 Dig AllOVZ MCIVIbii enure tegolorlz to, ftir ••■Ittiti, a p e 1 ' Ott tie", 3.9 !r, , , • GoIv, , 1.1- t" Vac 4 4 fb tiktait t: at ' L-s • r Treet/4 ';-?/•:,:-..: • . - .. • ;:aeant, o$ no objeetiono thavit3 poet:: ,f3..44 or wade' to the etiVi •-,, nr.a it hevitg bast proven - ..tei•tIvie Courb:4A0utty•e,oessteolarrtrii ''.' :. ., 1 :11$:• That neta the Oonuty•ato:t,ci riV _.- • Alter 4 ;y." ( e0) ,doya prey ioao to' thIsq r. ilaterY r. : c ., . . - 2 a "h t El ^ of 121 t..1 . of Old'apett`Son wai ri tho soght of , time; :bprIprittote (.typeirrtt tot ) toti coo., .-...fit u•;:, 'I: ie. 1 i • '..of tho 'moat }774b110- ploosE ;of 71cit10 Lea' Ur& trilt ?;,C..rt 4 a ,-...,.•, .. ... tit vtailts . o a ortpticrUtorCthepropOrtzzto:bpt;voseatp4,,,,, .. : . . i r '. A 4— . •+,:,. a ctil thie he,F.:i! 4' ...: .,.., . '• , :i ;:. -, i ... . r ii ::: , y:....Irtt.s-tiw - 4 , -,.;:P...,:litp. , 44:44 - 14-.4.4.4.. , ;4erc...;.9-F L . - --.-..., , X+ 'Id . Ind aCUrp,•:Oireittitot • •••= • • 411 1••i•-e7;,7 • • ••.:•. • . . • • • A .„ > • .!!,•":‘,.••.; •••■ • •c• • ••• • • 2.05;a1.1 th ct3; in , „1,11. *.4.1re!re4 • , : . . ••2 tesq: U. _'tfllAc. r, ' • Cln of . Ifoctni y elm!, *Rale rd 1)f t y CI? k of hourd. 14 •• d ' re.> ' • II t` kt ri amid pint o f WU1 Z2 t f i,t,R3 ; l i : ror.01e frthict oppeni a N.' reap re 1 ft t -- ilti 64 • .4 he; mai (to at Brokftr,a ty.00rizt; and &or:of:Arne 1 r.1 Pint hook ".14" or pap ; r:V;711 2:?T..1:.Elf:tfif!, the '!;.:nt of' • c "- t.!.fir PO Oct, ftf.rernft: sir ifq: nit t he north Wit} , , r ‘, 1 I •■. , 4. 1 • . •.• LCITH t. h 1• ••.: I; 1:ornd oriTthfL tt,O ii41 itho.ttt”.:7•• ; • , :tt, frtmt, 1,, • . ipt El...ter,' int trd IQU. 07 nettic uttete i r elic : 48 1 .! i t O. if f 7 1 rftfte t 7 . •• n 1 5V.trgaff,0' . i‘e'pl. the °Mon iti) tmt) wine had tr:te. •:Intri or I:1 t7:‘, F1 • •‘ 1:73111 • dn; of Doovmovir, f.ii. 1 • • ems .H.Jamod:...1,- • • • • • . :r" - : , oFFlcE or c(UNTY UTII.tTI.E'S DEPT. Spokane, Wash. Date: A'I /'Q 'O ,19 TO: ? P E.0 • FROM: - A R'C !. SUBJECT: Standard drainal language for the dedication on St, M MEAFIEiLb 1. The owners of Lots _,_,_, &_,of Block _ and lots & of block shall be held responsible for obstructing and artifically collecting or discharging the natural or manmade drainage flow across or adjacent to their property. 2. The property owner or his representative shall inform each suceeding purchaser of all drainage easements on the property and his responsibility for maintaining drainage facilities within said easements. 3. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage courses on private lots within drainage easements or flood plain areas nor the responsibility for any drainage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. 4. Floors, including basement floors, shall not be constructed below elevation , USC and CS datum, within lots & Block, and Lots _,_,_, &_ block of this plat without special construction standards as required by the "National Flood insurance Program" Title 24, Chapter X, Subchapter B, Part 1910.3 (C), paragraphs 3 and 4. pll An approved lot grading plan exists forAlnts� -'•_ ^' ' r _ +'- block —. Grading must conform to said plan on file in the County Engineer's Office. 6. Spokane County shall not be (held responsible to maintain ingress or egress across the flood plain area. 7 A ll oRiv& wMY p PPe{ogckES JNALL cool .COR•.^ -ro T HE 'Ftrp qOWA I L PLAnl,J qN 2_itO /4/ TH , r Po 4'.4i v E coOn-r ENGt•NEE/Q /J oFrrlC Ei' Access PERMl1 S mot_ "Vs ARE Rte0IREA RoR AU_ APPRDAcNES WE NEED A CoPY oP you F. H. A, GRRDFNG PL AV. The proposed subdivision would plat approximately 25.74 acres of valley farmland into 81 lots at an approximate density of 3.15 dwellings per acre. Roads will be paved and curbed at a width of 40 feet on through streets and 32 feet on streets with a cul -de -sac. Drainage swales adjacent to the curbs will channel storm water runoff to drywells located in the drainage swale. The predominant soil type on the site is Garrison Gravelly Loam, SCS Classification "B ". Features of the soil include rapid permeability and low water holding capacity which indicates a high suitability to drywells for disposal of storm water runoff. Due to the characteristics of the soil it is felt that the guide- line of 1 cfs per double barrel drywell is conservative in this instance. The effects of urbanization on storm water runoff is determined using the Rational Method. To facilitate the calculations the plat was divided into twelve sub -areas (See Figure 1). Sub -Area 1 Sub -Area 2 Area = 2.25 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.001 L = 500 feet n = 0.4 C = 0 Area = 0.95 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.008 L = 200 feet n = 0.4 C t = 0.15 SUMMERFIELD EAST ADDITION STORM DRAINAGE REPORT Q = AIR = 2.25(0.4)(1..6) = 1.08 cfs 50 - year storm Q = 0.68 cfs 10 -year storm T = C [Ln/ ✓sj O. 6 T = 26.87 min. • R = 1.6' 50 -year storm T = 8.85 min. R = 2.4 10 -year storm • Summerfield East Addition Storm Drainage Report Page Two Sub -Area 3 Area = 2.45 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.006 L = 700 feet n = 0.4 C = 0.15 Q = 1.43 cfs 50 -year storm NOTE: Sub -Area 3 includes land not within the plat boundary since future development will cause this area to con- tribute to the storm water runoff. Actual area within the plat = 1.65 acres. Sub -Area 4 Area = 5.4 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.005 L = 400 feet n = 0.4 C = 0.15 Q = 3.88 cfs 50 -year storm T = 20.46 min. R = 1.95 50 -year storm T c = 13.0 min. R = 2.4 50 -year storm NOTE: Actual area within plat = 2.94 acres while 5.40 acres is the total contribution area when future development is completed. Sub -Area 5 Area = 1.95 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.003 L = 400 feet n = 0.4 C = 0.15 Q = 1.25 cfs 50 -year storm T = 18.00 min. R = 2.15 50 -year storm Summerfield East Addition Storm Drainage Report Page Three Sub -Area 6 Sub -Area 7 Sub -Area 8 Area = 2.25 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.001 L = 500 feet n = 0.4 C = 0.15 Q = 1.08 cfs 50 -year storm Area = 2.0 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.006 L = 450 feet n = 0.4 C = 0.15 Q = 1.44 cfs 50 -year storm Area = 2.2 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.006 L = 350 feet n = 0.4 C = 0.15 Q = 1.25 cfs 10 -year storm T c = 26.87 min. R = 1.6 50 -year storm T c = 15.70 min. R = 2.4 50 -year storm NOTE: Olympic Avenue is on the upland side of the drainage area, therefore, much of the storm water runoff is away from the street. T c = 13.50 min. R = 1.9 10 -year storm NOTE: Only 0.92 acres of the 2.2 acre drainage area is actually within the plat boundary. Summerfield East Addition Storm Drainage Report Page Four Sub -Area 9 Area = 2.95 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.009 L = 450 feet n = 0.4 C = 0.15 Sub -Area 10 Area = 3.1 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.012 L = 500 feet n = 0.4 C = 0.15 Sub -Area 11 Q = 1.68 cfs 10 -year storm Q = 2.42 cfs 50 -year storm Area = 1.3 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.007 L = 420 feet n = 0.4 C = 0.15 Sub -Area 12 Q = 0.98 cfs 50 -year storm Area = 3.7 acres I = 0.3 S = 0.006 L = 600 feet n = 0.4 C = 0.15 Q = 2.33 cfs 50 -year storm T c = 13.90 min. R = 1.9 10 -year storm T c = 13.58 min. R = 2.6 50 -year storm T c = 14.37 min. R = 2.5 50 -year storm T c = 18.65 min. R = 2.1 50 -year storm Summerfield East Addition Storm Drainage Report Page Five The present design includes 17 double barrel drywells and 2 single barrel drywells. Since some of the drainage areas included land outside of the plat boundary which is subject to future development and installation of drywells, and con- sidering the high permeability of the soil, it is felt that this design is sufficient to handle the anticipated runoff. INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION F 477Lb2/•/' do ames M. Paulson 9/21/79 1/ C?Yt ccF br / Sub - Argo. a = • /a? ..jr._(f_ = 2 77 = 5 ma). 6 P r.° 7 0 I-- 50 r c. r VC t. C 61 o repot I 033 CO /2- v_r / le 71 pr r ?) 7.,. c CO C, 11/1 0 r co n (,) 1 , C) ) .r\ on ok L ) 0..Y\ 7' / 0 S . 7 J r-ck:n a3 c ri n r.-\ " c e l (. el .-_-•- ro ■ nri no, (Di ryno, 1 c 3 r, -2 2 r ei a c ) .1 Le . - r: o cock i.:\ ' t i fiC Sr S . _. - Set rE Ttr, . f s: ;1 _ 3 1_ 1 \ r o Th cc ( 4: (7 Lk -. lir no,. a is •&,/--/-,_ zln.oj)42r- _ r • r.L../10.:2 N-. 0 Lk :----. 0 L 50 in. pi /0 rl • r / / C; / j/1L9 222072 /7 a 7 I J /7 - b)eL qroJ C 0/it* rd 91/1 • Cy. C- c/ 17. 27 0_ 7 ( - )/ • :2 7 - 7 - '•' ri ,j7 .e.. e c il,2 ea 6 = 2. "SL re t a.\ re _L = . = rz7 •E: 0 :` • • a = , o 275 • , (a00 , COI ) - 4-cr Q 5-? ) ; )t °col (1 /1 .0 r 17 BD /4 2 / . 21 , CrTr rtii2OTT ct r O A Oi r pc1 r - r • r / it _ PC, cyf _ - ac .(. • • S cf I !., • • /7/7 00 ::I/V1o/70 / ... vas /c/ c/r3coel . ohi // - ke of -HI e odd I f-ia a,(; rua o f fro rr. - �h poiI of OJcIICs)ee,j flue. ' /rrta .,.zoo cilzpoce Site oinci �h e r ;.� n o a� k -r .p� �o c `�ro3 �� e i rvirersec�,�oh oT U-�('�Ic'S�C CO b\ plc +k€ u rh rro ( L k "cho ojTC Ut II ±o.bce G_ ns{ 1I1 nJ — i�✓C / /eve , 04 / Co nn re u rre. • c a . V so uk u7e s ry Wet o ..f Poo oJe -ie u FIELD INFURMAlION OFFICE CALCULATIONS AND i):( SIG!. rmlir %C. 'fig-- ;:A- #1 STA. //2 b ELEV. //3 E.P. ELEV. 84 • DIST. FROM k to E.P. J15 DIST. FROM E.P. TO CIIRR /l6 MINIMUM CURB ELEV. (4.57 SLOPE FROM E.P. + CURB HEIGHT) 117 MAXIMUM CURB ELEV. (27 SLOPE FROM E.P. + CURB HEIGHT) I/8 SELECTED ELEV. N9 X GRADE - Z1o 25 5S —1+so 0 2 76 3u ° 76-.. - 26, — /0 /o 76, /3 Z6.5 .x./3 . Z237Z v . o 26< "" =2 z6= /o /0,5 /G 5 /0,.5 z6. 3o 7 6 , 5 . 6 7e,, 52_ ,G° r if 0, 26< : 2,6 tE /0 X12 Z _.6, CO ,0 ' -- - Ii co 26 7Y Z6 _ /o /U %(. -7 ' - : - b 2100 21r 5a 26 /0.5 Z6 r` .Y� Z6.G� zZ6-5 ., z �i. P ,��.�. 2'9 7 ,,,,sz ���� /0 /.=. _c.G . 01 & Vi icor 5 5 ,c,-09i a , 1 fl n!= 27_ 26,C7 – /0 /0 5i - 76 l� L T X6.90 Irmo G7. _ :, 21 == o by. 27 S (A ti I iiluc. 1t a (rl' ' - ` - - ' _= — -ie u INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. South 25 Altamont Street Phone: (509) 535 -1410 Spokane, Washington 99202 January 31, 1984 Gary Nelson Spokane County Engineers North 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 Dear Gary: RE: Summerfield East We are resubmitting for your review and approval a copy of the final plat and street plans for proposed final plat at Summerfield East. The proposed final plat is a portion of previous final plats. A new plat certificate has been ordered and should have reached you. The street plans are basically the same as those previously reviewed and approved by you 'as a part of the earlier proposal. We have adopted the Home- stead Standard Detail Sheet, which necessitated revising the grate elevations on drywells. We have also revised the curb elevations along Wellesley Avenue to get slightly better grades than earlier plans achieved (.004 versus .002). Enclosed is a worksheet for Wellesley Avenue showing existing curbing and paving elevations in Wellesley. The drainage study previously submitted should apply to this project without any revisions. We are aware that it was agreed that a berm be built along the north plat boundary because of drainage problems. We have no objections to that plan. A final plat review fee of $430.00 ($200 + $10 x 28 building lots) is enclosed. Sincerely, INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 4/ W, Eric Calkins EWC:jes enc. Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Environmental Analysis Gentlemen: GSN /set . 91 E c. Thank you. Attachment 4.3 :I�' ( ) t S. %S " 'I1: ( 7 I .l N A J2 COUNTY ENGINEER Sincerely, ROBERT 5. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER S inoic.txi: ,Warbo jxiroN 99260 RE: SU .v∎w.2 r F ;el cl t=ecs± A review of the road, drainage, and parking plans for the above- refer- enced plat, has been accomplished. Areas of concern to us are indicated in red on the attached prints. Please make the corrections and resubmit them to this office in order that the review process may proceed. When the plans are resubmitted, mark all changes on the revised print in color. If you have any questions about this review, please contact us at 456 -3600. Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer r� f4e"lson, P.E. Planning Engineer Vv'orks 13uikliny North 811 Jeiferst' :it rev: Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3600 Oct. 1978 January 1979 SUMMERFIELD EAST - CHRONOLOGY REGARDING FLOODING Sept. 21, 1979 Draft Environmental Impact Statement - Summerfield East; for 268 residential lots on 91 acres; prepared by Inland Pacific Engineering & Construction Corp.; p. vii notes that existing flooding along Forker Road may impact the project; p. viii explains that a county Storm Water Mangement Plan would mitigate the drainage problems caused by runoff in the Forker Rd. drainage basin and also two methods of controlling storm water from this basin are available to the project sponsor and are identified in the Summerfield East Storm Drainage Report (Appendix A); Appendix A looks at an 86 acre subdivision with 268 lots, looks at runoff from project from 50 -year storm (24 hours = 2.4 inches precip.); also looked at drainage area above the plat for 50 -year storm; seems to conclude that a 50" diameter culvert would be needed to handle that flow; an addendum notes that could also construct a retnetion pond at northeast boundary of proposed plat; pond would be about 2 acres in surface area and 5 feet deep with capacity to retain peak flow of 132 cfs and dispose of it; notes that for a storm of greater frequency, an overflow structure could be constructed to take the flow along Forker Road to existing ditch and allowed to bypass the plat; p. 21 notes plat is sufficiently above Spokane River to be out of the 100 -year flood plain, also describes old canal in Forker Road area; p. 22 mentions that appropriate stormwater detention /retention sites are available at intersection of Forker and Progress. Final Environmental Impact Statement - Summerfield East; discusses, in response to comment from Health District, on p. 92 the status of the old irrigation canal; on p. 112 Dobratz comments that "storm drainage facilities are to be included that will insure the safety of the proposed project and adjacent areas." Summerfield East Addition Storm Drainage Report by James M. Paulson is for a 25.74 acre site proposed to be platted into 81 lots; it appears to deal only with stormwater to be generated by the project; it refers to 10 -year and 50 -year storms. Summerfield East Chronology page 2 March 25, 1980 April 17, 1980 July 18, 1980 July 21, 1980 Jan. 31,1984 Letter from William Main to Bob Turner noting that Gary Nelson had required design and construction of a drainage pond as part of approval for first phase (as shown on attached sketch); idea of pond came from EIS mentioning stormwater runoff from Forker Rd; requests design and construction of drainage pond be deleted as part of first phase conditions; agree to meet drainage pond condition when co. engineer deems necessary. Letter from Gary Kennaly to Bill Main explaining that a drainage plan is to be prepared by developer's engineer; if engineer finds little or no effect on public, health, safety and welfare on new lots in phase one, then plan should reflect that analysis; if finds drainage problem with phase one, then engineering solution is required. Letter from Jerry Sinclair (IPEC) to G. Kennaly noting discussions with owners of local properties regarding flooding; no flooding observed in area of Trentwood Elementary; flooding seen through wide swale area just to north and west of phase I; attached aerial photo seems to show flooding to northwest and southeast of phase I; Sinclair concludes that flooding does occur on a good portion of the preliminary plat, but vey little, if any, has occurred in the first phase; "Based on our previous calculations and the construction of a low berm around Phase I, we request that the construction of the drainage pond be removed as a requirement for the first phase of Summerfield East." Letter from G. Kennaly to J. Sinclair saying co. engineers office concurs with recommendation to delete pond for Phase I with understanding that it will be constructed with Phase II; also concurs with recommendation that berm be constructed; berm should be included on plans submitted for review. Letter from Eric Calkins, IPEC, to Gary Nelson noting that it was agreed taht a berm be built along the north plat boundary because of drainage problems. Jan. 15, 1985 Summerfield East 2nd Addition, Storm Drainage Analysis provides calculations for 10 -year storm. Reconstructed from Co. Engineer's files for Summerfield East (1206, 1206A, 1206B, 1206C and Storm Drainage) By B. Sims, 7 -25 -89 0466B atikV4V.V*Vuktaq Ili eig_kIDN. E ���Q ` i" x Z m a �. � � ti l e !'' am f � ti"�f a9t..i ..a" -cam. y » : Pm i t 0 ife tizir r O TO: BUILDING AND PLANNING • JANIES L. MANSON, C.B.O.. DIRECTOR Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads; Pat Harper c/o Sandy Kimball Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane County Parks, Recreation & Fair; Steve Horobiowski Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Spokane County Division of Buildings; Jeff Forry Long Range Planning Division; John Mercer Fire Protection District 1 Trentwood Irrigation District East Valley School District No. 361 FROM: John W. Pederson Senior Planner LJ DATE: December 11, 1998 Enclosure MEMORANDUM SPOKANE Conroy CNGINEER C O U N T Y A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Extension of Time for PE- 1206 -78; SUMMERFIELD EAST RECEIVED DEC 14 1998 The Spokane County Division of Building & Planning has received the attached request for an Extension of Time to finalize the above - referenced preliminary plat. If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should be made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to me by December 28, 1998. Thank you. c: Kenneth Tupper, Owner /Applicant Inland Pacific Engineering Co. /Surveyor 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKAANE, WASHINGTON 99260 PHONE: (509) 456 -3675 • FAX: (509) 456 -1703 TDD: (509) 324 -3166 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & PLANNING EXTENSION OF TIME APPLICATION PE 1206 -78 FILENO.: Owner: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: Applicant /Sponsor: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: Surveyor: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: yes DATE I:A TOr 'I Kenneth J. Tupper E. 12929 Sprague Avenue Spokane, WA 99212 (509) 928 -1991 Same as above Inland Pacific Engineering 707 W. 7th, Ste 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509) 458 -6840 Fax: Fax: Fax: NO. OF LOTS: 266 1. Has any portion of the plat, short plat or BSP been finalized? (Recorded with the Auditor) 2. Has a proposed final plat. short plat or DSP been submitted to the Division of Building and Planning? Yes X _ No If no, why has the plat, short plat or DSP not been finalized? ;. What progress has occurred? What conditions of approval have been completed (such as survey work, improvements constructed, departmental approvals obtained)? See attached If 'es, q, is this a phased project? Yes X No } lease complete the following information: please No. of lots oricinally approved: 266 No. of phases finalized to date: 46 No. of lots remaining to be finalized: 133 No. of acres remaining to date: SIGNATU 'E OF O PLEASE SUBMIT THIS FORM ALONG WITH THE REQUIRED TIME EXTENSION FEE TO THE DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING G:\DOC\SRS \TUPPER\EXTENS. DOC ATTACHMENT TO EXTENSION OF TIME FORM Four phases of the Summerfield East plat have been finalized into 135 lots. Finalization of the remaining 133 lots on 45 acres have been delayed due to difficulties in obtaining approval of the storm water management systems to handle off site drainage on to the site from Forker draw. In the past six years, the developer has engaged in engineering and geological investigations of the Forker draw watershed culminating in a "Geology Report of the Forker Draw Watershed" which was submitted to Spokane County and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). In addition, several engineering and design reports for construction of a storm water system capable of handling 100 year floor events have been produced and submitted for review by Spokane County. Also, working in conjunction with Spokane County, Developer has sought changes in FEN1A's designation of Forker draw as a "alluvial fan" and also sought changes in the 100 year flood plain boundary. The resolution of storm water issues for this plat is complicated and difficult involving not only the concurrence of Spokane County but coordination with FEMA. As noted above, the Developer had diligently pursued all various design options and has produced original research and report on the Forker draw watershed. In the past 3 years the developer has completed mapping and an evaluation report regarding the flood zone as it affects their plat and obtained the concurrence of Spokane County as to its location. The Developer has also engaged Inland Pacific Engineering ( "IPEC ") to prepare a final plat for 55 lots on 23 acres. IPEC has initiated drawings and studies for the final plat for review by Spokane County Utilities and Engineering Department. These drawings are studies which include a Topographic Survey, Septic Tank/Drainfield Investigation, Road and Drainage Plans, Water and Sewer System Plans, and Final Plat layout. The Developer has been informed that IPEC and Spokane County will be unable to complete and approve the Final Plat prior to the expiration of the approval for the preliminary plat (February 1, 1997). Kimball, Sandy '&ee Wemrnc yd. PE From: Hemmings, Bill Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 1998 10:02 AM To: Pederson, John Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Harper, Pat; Kimball, Sandy; Busko, Doug; Miller, Katherine; Sims, Brenda; Darrell, Virginia Subject: P -1206 - Summerfield East - Time Extension Request 12 -16 -98 I received the above referenced application on Dec. 11, 1998. I recommend a time extension with the following updated conditions of approval: • A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to all current standards and laws governing stormwater management in Spokane County. Final drainage plans and a drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a construction or building permit, or approval of the land action. • The stormwater management systems and roads for this plat shall be constructed and certified to be constructed in accordance with the accepted road and drainage plans, or all the required improvements must be bonded for in accordance with Spokane County regulations, prior to the recording of the final plat. Record drawings and all construction documentation shall be submitted with the proper certification statement. • A bond for the anticipated engineering inspection and certification portion of the project shall be posted with the County Engineer prior to plan acceptance. • If the project is phased and one phase depends on another phase for access and /or drainage treatment and disposal, the prior phase shall be completed and certified prior to the submittal of plans for the dependent phase of the development. One foot no access strips on public roads will not be released until the subject phase is completed, certified and accepted by Spokane County for maintenance. No access through a non certified and non- accepted phase of the development may be allowed and no plans will be accepted by Spokane County for construction unless the prior phase is completed and certified by the Sponsor's Engineer. • Adequate drainage easements, granted to Spokane County and /or an acceptable maintenance entity, must be provided for all elements of the drainage plan, in order that proper maintenance may be performed. Easements for drainage ditches and natural drainage channels shall be wide enough to contain within the easement the runoff from a 50 year, 24 hour storm event for the contributing basin, plus a 30% freeboard. The easement shall also include an adequate maintenance access for the drainage course. Page 1 1 22.08 01sona 73.90 DISCHG 24.00 DISCHG 25.00 DISCHG 24.00 DISCHG 27.00 DISCHG 29.00 DISCHG RUNOFF VOLUME ABOVE OPERATION ADDHYD TR20 XEO 03-07 00:24 REV PC 09/93( TIME(HRS) S^0w 9.00 1@.@0 11..00 12.00 13,00 14.00 15.00 16.00 17.00 1S.0@ 19^0@ 20,00 21.00 22.00 23^00 24.0@ 25.0@ 26.00 27.00 28.00 RUNOFF PEAK TIME(HRS) 12.6? DISCHG DISCHG DISCHG DISCHG DISCHG DISCHG DISCHG DISCHG DISCHG DISCHG DISCHG PI5CH8 DISCH8 DISCHG DISCHG DISCHG DISCHG DISCHG DISCHG DISCHG DISCHG 4.49 6.45 3.44 , 69 . 1S BASEFLOW = 1,67 WATERSHED INCHES, CROSS SECTION 31 FIRST HYDRD8RAPH POINT . 00 .01 ^ 3T .46 1.81 2.01 4,:T 5.55 S4.32 161.57 443,12 393^10 158.82 147.56 88"09 24.25 A4.54 63.23 56.43 55.37 49.54 48.85 41^42 41.13 40.02 39.43 32.07 31.76 S0.99 30.98 31.09 31,11 30.81 30,06 7.23 5.63 . T5 .62 .13 .11 . 02 .01 = .00 HOURS ,S1 .57 2.22 6.44 268.50 349.06 137.54 80.9 62.13 54.30 47.95 40.91 38~57 31.53 30^9S 31.13 2S,69 4.39 .51 .09 .01 6^49 4.15 2.18 .12 .08 .01 10/17/84 SPOKANE FIS PORKER ROAD PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS 590.71 31.27 • TIME IN .02 ^69 2.45 7.60 388,74 310^63 128.78 78,10 61.24 53^S0 46.92 40.76 37.58 31.37 30.99 31.16 26.72 3^43 .43 . ▪ 01 • . 9. 4S8. 276. 121.| 75.; 52. 45. 40. 36. 31. 31. 31. 24 VOLUME ABOVE GASEFLDW = .86 WATERSHED INCHES, 1264~87 POND -2 Version: 5.15 S /N: 1295160123 >>>>> HYDROGRAPH PRINTOUT <<<<< 03 -20 -1991 17 :05:51 Hydrograph file: C: \PONDPACK \FORKER .HYD Time Hours HYDROGRAPH ORDINATES (cfs) Time increment = 0.100 Hours Time on left represents time for first Q in each row. 8.000 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.10 8.700 0.15 0.21 0.28 0.37 0.46 0.57 0.69 9.400 0.82 0.95 1.10 1.26 1.43 1.61 1.81 10.100 2.01 2.22 2.45 2.69 2.95 3.24 3.56 10.800 3.92 4.35 4.87 5.55 6.44 7.60 9.08 11.500 10.93 13.43 17.02 23.56 40.95 84.32 161.57 12.200 268.50 388.74 488.26 557.83 588.88 581.55 546.60 12.900 496.28 443.12 393.10 349.06 310.63 276.65 247.45 13.600 223.30 203.24 186.21 171.51 158.82 147.56 137.54 14.300 128.78 121.02 114.15 108.00 102.36 97.21 92.40 15.000 88.09 84.25 80.92 78.10 75.66 73.51 71.50 15.700 69.57 67.76 66.07 64.54 63.23 62.13 61.24 16.400 60.53 59.97 59.48 58.93 58.27 57.41 56.43 17.100 55.37 54.30 53.30 52.42 51.70 51.13 50.71 17.800 50.37 50.01 49.54 48.85 47.95 46.92 45.84 18.500 44.77 43.80 42.98 42.31 41.80 41.42 41.13 19.200 40.91 40.76 40.65 40.58 40.54 40.51 40.48 19.900 40.34 40.02 39.43 38.57 37.58 36.51 35.46 20.600 34.49 33.66 32.99 32.47 32.07 31.76 31.53 21.300 31.37 31.24 31.16 31.09 31.05 31.02 31.00 22.000 30.99 30.98 30.98 30.99 31.00 31.01 31.02 22.700 31.04 31.05 31.07 31.09 31.11 31.13 31.16 23.400 31.08 31.20 31.22 31.25 31.25 31.12 30.81 24.100 30.06 28.69 26.72 24.00 20.91 17.68 14.56 24.800 11.70 9.24 7.23 5.63 4.39 3.43 2.69 25.500 2.13 1.70 1.37 1.12 0.92 0.75 0.62 26.200 ' 0.51 0.43 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.21 0.18 26.900 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.05 27.600 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 28.300 0.01 0.01 0.00 Rr+CiJ APR 1 9 1993 Engineering POND -2 Version: 5.15 S /N: 1295160123 > » > OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH ESTIMATOR ««< Inflow Hydrograph: C: \PONDPACK \FORKER .HYD Qpeak = 588.9 cfs Estimated Outflow: C: \PONDPACK \ESTIMATE.EST Qpeak = 20.0 cfs Approximate Storage Volume (computed from t= 9.30 to 24.53 hrs) 90.7 acre -ft RECEIVED taR 19 1993 ta m fauna POND -2 Version: 5.15 S /N: 1295160123 Plotted: 03 -20 -1991 11.9 - 12.0 - 12.1 - 12.2 - 12.3 - 12.4 - 12.5 - 12.6 - 12.7 - 12.8 - 12.9 - 13.4 - 13.5 - 13.6 - 13.7 - 13.8 - 13.9 - 14.0 - TIME (hrs) Flow (cfs) 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 1 1 � * File: C: \PONDPACK \FORKER .HYD Amax = 588.9 cfs x File: C: \PONDPACK \ESTIMATE.EST Omax = 20.0 cfs Cady Enginaerinz POND -2 Version: 5.15 S /N: 1295160123 »»> OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH ESTIMATOR ««< Inflow Hydrograph: C:OPONDPACKOFORKER .HYD Qpeak = 588.9 cfs Estimated Outflow: C: OPONDPACKOESTIMATE.EST Qpeak = 110.0 cfs Approximate Storage Volume (computed from t= 11.60 to 14.57 hrs) 50.0 acre -ft RECEIVED APR 1 91993 Duty tnSineerins POND-2 Version: 5.15 S/N: 1295160123 Plotted: 01-03-1980 Flow (cfs) 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5- 0 11.9-5 x* 6 x * 12.0-5 x 5 x 12.1-6 x 6 x 12.2-5 x 6 x 12.3 -5 x 5 x 12.4-5 6 x 12.5-5 f x 6 x 12.6-6 6 12.7-5 6 12.8 6 12.9-5 6 13.0-5 6 13.1-5 5 13.2 -5 6 13.3 -5 6 13.4 -5 5 13.5 -5 6 13.6-6 6 13.7 -5 6 13.8 -5 6 13.9 -5 6 14.0-5 0 TIME (hrs) * File: C:OPONDPACKOFORKER .HYD Qmax = 588.9 cfs x File: C:OPONDPACKOESTIMATE.EST Qmax = 110.0 cfs RECEIVED APR 19 199i ;anti Engineering POND-2 Version: 5.15 S /N: 1295160123 >>>» OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH ESTIMATOR ««< Inflow Hydrograph: C: \PONDPACK \FORKER .HYD Qpeak = 588.9 cfs Estimated Outflow: C: \PONDPACK \ESTIMATE.EST Qpeak = 80.0 cfs Approximate Storage Volume (computed from t= 11.50 to 15.23 hrs) 56.3 acre -ft RECEIVED APR 191993 teeny Engineering POND -2 Version: 5.15 S /N: 1295160123 Plotted: 03 -21 -1991 11.9 - 12.0 - 12.1 - 12.2 - 12.3 - 12.4 - 12.5 - 12.6 - 12.7 - 12.8 - 12.9 - 13.0 - 13.1 - 13.2 - 13.3 - 13.4 - 13.5 - 13.6 - 13.7 - 13.8 - 13.9 14.0 - TIME (hrs) Flow (cfs) 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 1 * File: C: \PONDPACK \FORKER .HYD Qmax = 588.9 cfs x File: C: \PONDPACK \ESTIMATE.EST 9max. = 80.0 cfs RECEIVED) APR 191993 Conti Engineeriil POND -2 Version: 5.15 S /N: 1295160123 >»» OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH ESTIMATOR ««< Inflow Hydrograph: C: \PONDPACK \FORKER .HYD Qpeak = 588.9 cfs Estimated Outflow: C: \PONDPACK \ESTIMATE.EST Qpeak = 60.0 cfs Approximate Storage Volume (computed from t= 11.20 to 16.49 hrs) 63.1 acre -ft szicavio APR 1 91993 GeuntI Lit ueuiria POND -2 Version: 5.15 S /N: 1295160123 Plotted: 03 -20 -1991 11.9 - 12 0 12.1 - 12.2 - 12.3 - 12.4 - 12.5 - 12.6 - 12.7 - 12.8 - 12.9 - 13.0 - 13.1 - 13.2 - 13.3 - 13.4 - 13.5 - 13.6 - 13.7 - 13.8 - 13.9 - 14.0 - TIME (hrs) Flow (cfs) 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 � � � � 1 1 * File: C: \PONDPACK \FORKER .HYD Qmax = 588.9 cfs x File: C: \PONDPACK \ESTIMATE.EST Qmax = 60.0 cfs RECEJVcID 1:,c13 POND -2 Version: 5.15 S /N: 1295160123 >»» OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH ESTIMATOR ««< Inflow Hydrograph: C: \PONDPACK \FORKER .HYD Qpeak = 588.9 cfs Estimated Outflow: C: \PONDPACK \ESTIMATE.EST Qpeak = 20.0 cfs Approximate Storage Volume (computed from t= 9.30 to 24.53 hrs) 3,951,700 cubic -ft RECEIVED APR I.. aunty Enginccria:*. POND -2 Version: 5.15 S /N: 1295160123 Plotted: 03 -20 -1991 11.9 - 12.0 - 12.1 - 12.2 - 12.3 - 12.4 - 12.5 - 12.6 - 12.7 - 12.8 - 12.9 - 13.0 - 13.1 - 13.2 - 13.3 - 13.4 - 1.3.5 - 13.6 - 13.7 - 13.8 - 13.9 - 14.0 - TIME (hrs) Flow (cfs) 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 * File: C: \PONDPACK \FORKER .HYD Qmax = 588.9 cfs x File: C: \PONDPACK \ESTIMATE.EST 9max = 20.0 cfs RECEIVED APR 1 9 1993 Sau> i, Nippit:o2 Hemmings, Bill From: Hemmings, Bill Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 1998 10:02 AM To: Pederson, John Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Harper, Pat; Kimball, Sandy; Busko, Doug; Miller, Katherine; Sims, Brenda; Darrell, Virginia Subject: P -1206 - Summerfield East - Time Extension Request 12 -16 -98 I received the above referenced application on Dec. 11, 1998. I recommend a time extension with the following updated conditions of approval: • A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to all current standards and laws governing stormwater management in Spokane County. Final drainage plans and a drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a construction or building permit, or approval of the land action. • The stormwater management systems and roads for this plat shall be constructed and certified to be constructed in accordance with the accepted road and drainage plans, or all the required improvements must be bonded for in accordance with Spokane County regulations, prior to the recording of the final plat. Record drawings and all construction documentation shall be submitted with the proper certification statement. • A bond for the anticipated engineering inspection and certification portion of the project shall be posted with the County Engineer prior to plan acceptance. • if the project is phased and one phase depends on another phase for access and /or drainage treatment and disposal, the prior phase shall be completed and certified prior to the submittal of plans for the dependent phase of the development. One foot no access strips on public roads will not be released until the subject phase is completed, certified and accepted by Spokane County for maintenance. No access through a non certified and non - accepted phase of the development may be allowed and no plans will be accepted by Spokane County for construction unless the prior phase is completed and certified by the Sponsor's Engineer. • Adequate drainage easements, granted to Spokane County and /or an acceptable maintenance entity, must be provided for all elements of the drainage plan, in order that proper maintenance may be performed. Easements for drainage ditches and natural drainage channels shall be wide enough to contain within the easement the runoff from a 50 year, 24 hour storm event for the contributing basin, plus a 30% freeboard. The easement shall also include an adequate maintenance access for the drainage course. Fite Weatmege & P5 Page 1 Inter- office Communication To S E R R Y n' S 1 111 S From GAR N Y . Subject SUMMER FI EL-0 Form 327 -C.R OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 0 Date 0 /' / a O FAST These pIaAs ca v-. be kscAA to eaJcuLArE C QOen. d • Pie -a- a IN fa -rl".t 'shcob•s is+ a is. c y o'f c‘.• Riga gra.Xt, tie Vas+;mr•s ma o h. &Ac , , ‘e. a. S t I n if 0ANa - p6 C _ r -s'- : j w; 1.\ hee c - -0 h er Co ARE, be"f , tt ,19 r TO: FROM: RE: LP1 -J I. GENERAL INFORMATION Sponsor 928 -1991 Wm. Main Corp. -TDC, Inc E. 12929 Sprague Spokane, WA 99216 Location The proposal Valley being adjacent Forker Road; within Section 35, Township Comprehensive Plan URBAN STAFF REPORT February 3, 1983 SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF EXTENSION OF TIME for PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ..._ PE- 1206 -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST ZE- 202 -78, AGRICULTURAL to RI Surveyor /Engineer 535 -1410 Inland Pacific Engineering Co. S. 25 Altamont Street Spokane, WA 99202 is located in the Trentwood area of the Spokane and between Wellesley Ave., Progress Road and 26N, Range 44 EWM., Spokane County, Washington History The proposal was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee January 1979. Two one -year extensions have been granted by the Hearing Examiner Committee; January 1981 and January 1982. All survey, engineer- ing design and drafting has been completed for phase -one (with 81 lots) to be finalized. Additionally, alternative sewage disposal and drainage studies have been completed for E.P.A. and F.H.A. regarding groundwater contamination and environmental mitigation requirements. The delay of finalizing this preliminary plat continues to be the current poor economic conditions of the housing market, but the sponsor indicates a positive trend with hopes of finalizing phase -one during 1983. Proposal The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the preli- minary plat approval to divide 91 acres into 266 lots for single family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 91 acres from Agricultural to R -1. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION The Planning Department is recommending that all preliminary plat approvals be brought into conformance with RCW. 58.17 regarding the amount of time allowed before a preliminary plat must be finalized. State law currently allows a preliminary plat three (3) years (without any new conditions) and allows one extension of time for one year, if the sponsor requests the additional year; however, this 4th year may have new conditions added. No other additional conditions of approval are being recommended by the re- maining departments. 11 TO: .Z P. E.c• OFFICE OF COUNTY UTILITIES DEPT. Spokane, Wash. FROM: GARY N . SUBJECT: Standard drainage language for the dedication on Sep M ME R F IEL A All An approved lot grading plan exists forNlots r _ block_. Grading must conform to said plan on file in the County Engineer's Office. WE NEED A COPY OF YOUR F. N.A. ORkD,M& PL•&k'' 1. The owners of Lots ,S,of Block and lots 6 of block • shall be'hel& responsible for obstructing and artificallg collecting or discharging the natural or manmade drainage flow across or adjacent to their property: 2. The property owner or his representative shall inform each suceeding purchaser of all drainage easements on the property and his responsibility -for maintaining drainage facilities within said easements. 3. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage courses on private lots within drainage easements or flood plain areas nor the ..y. responsibility for any drainage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. 4. Floors, including basement floors, shall not be constructed below elevation , USG and GS datum, within lots ,5 Block , and Lots k_ block of this plat without special construction standards as required by the "National Flood Insurance Program" Title 24, Chapter X, Subchapter B, Part 1910.3 (C), paragraphs 3 and 4. 6. Spokane County shall not be held responsible to maintain ingress or egress across the flood plain area. 7 All ORvvewAr AP Pis oActd6f JA1ALL con/rof"•■ •r0 rrle Rtog Jr' PLAN -3 oN r -IcOE /A, r1-1 !Re4',4n cCOin ENG- WEE/V -1 orrlC j+ ACcesS PERMits d L ARE Rt QOSRE D Fo R ALL APPROAc NES • w /9 e of ca ot STO brai (3e Repor �! G TJ2ar - 1,8CD Area a = /29 acres er3 = /5 I = , 9 =C/ 29 ac resD(9) �, 5<0 = 5 cf T = S r71/27. \\ • _ 5_!a SO 8r sl}o r_rrm F1 Sin3)e barrel dr ca oSe of t) e. runoff F r0 n< -Eke or ea_ �_ \_Y1 eC � 1� *1\-e � '- O rlolG..1 1 repor 7/Le a/rcJtaic. report Luccs comp kited Prier - h_e E7t 5 5 rad itioo E L ca62.6,c t ia_r` and plan h ra s �h e_accJao g a o n-, -Eke_ Q s— cl a�a�.rLi- ac� - -a\o c' r acrr- 3 ar -d 4c -Ekie back { / ere c�ro.�.�.c�__--- ocec�o-P_ Su b =_ r _Q o __ a Ls- -c � - ttL= t�_5 Ma/kr--- acn, Fraulc &saSSarkt brt 7 ,ir de. ccr_rziacoLtLa» col /}f/_e— f_vnof{ comrrn &o the b eef - thcci - ' G n.d -he J c. racLe_avera3irz _o_ . 5 2 1 c /of e, *I2ri & co.-Kra-lc /c_ Lis /Zof , eco'e er— cec�,'ori oic _th3 bask 8-oa "___ Cluia_ko_acif 5446 - � r-ea_ 4 = a 25 acres Res:def -1a] 3.o acres r = 2. 25 x 3 _ 695 3,00 X Z = , 60 1, 275 = 24 5,05 S. ZS 1:275 to = /5 (Boo "K,4 ,o01 = 38 ma, so c s-I-o r rr 5.2 /,2! _ /, c-F5 w /7/7 addifiorta s� ljk Barre/ dr3wel w, // h-e re wren( L o clr5p05 o-F Lite_ addh_trat\a.l__ rte. _e- _sch,00(__ i4- e_ arc_ por+i'or_ o -Odelle_s Ley_aUe,��zari' of -- f� e_ru,rLoff fco _ si k_ c i_.I)_ to ce-_c _so-u±k_udes-L p }Le - pr o 0 . si Fe_._8 _insta r`3_ we.LI _o. - __ i ti Sac r'ot� o __(�elleslej _five ore Car, pi r uh_o TO: .t P E. c • OFFICE OF COUNTY UTILITIES DEPT. Spokane, Wash. Date: 3 ;t/ FROM: GARY N • SUBJECT: Standard drainage language for the dedication on Sum M E R F IE1-6 1. The owners of Lots , & of Block and lots ,, & of block shall be held responsible for obstructing and artifically collecting or discharging the natural or manmade drainage flow across or adjacent to their property. 2. The property owner or his representative shall inform each suceeding purchaser of all drainage easements on the property and his responsibility for maintaining drainage facilities within said easements. 3. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage courses on private lots within drainage easements or flood plain areas nor the responsibility for any drainage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. 4. Floors, including basement floors, shall not be constructed below elevation , USC and CS datum, within lots ,& Block , and Lots k_ block of this plat without special construction standards as required by the "National Flood Insurance Program" Title 24, Chapter X, Subchapter B, Part 1910.3 (C), paragraphs 3 and 4. All An approved lot grading plan exists fornlots _ _ _,&_ B1ee14 block—, Grading must conform to said plan on file in the County Engineer's Office. 6. Spokane County shall not be held responsible to maintain ingress or egress across the flood plain area. 7 A 11 DThVEt✓AY AP IMOAckES 3NALC Conl,C0R� ro tH E RiDA ow,q PLANS oN c coo nr-Y £N .. qEE R /s Orr c C't 'fkg ARE R t a4 V r E (� F/cC //v TH 1Po,i -ANE el Access PE&rttrs F o R ALL APPRDAc HAS We NEED A c.oPY or` Your F.N.A. GRADIn1G PLAN SiDE WALK it • 1 41 zi! if a. 29> frat r .V1 1 2 1 . • utr t•it' 4 ri DRAINAGE SWALE -- •Th A t i 1 ' I ; L"V fr• -• 1/4 ••••■•• 1 L CHAIR [ RAMP \16! /et ..1,Att111•111".1N..1 :451)101Sn 6. 1; T I r ; fy • :9 011;;';'Ili / • ',tar H y . tl / 101•,..1 •• • j 11 • V • 6 , wr, GUTTER 2 --uRuPPED CURB CORNER SIDEWALK DETAIL CASE t SIDEWALK ;II L .•!;) #4 ...Se ;---- , f . r .. 1. 0 . 114 4: ,,,41.4.... '' DRAIN AGE SWALE s tj j::; 4f: . -1%1 • ' '11: . 1 .••••• 4titi4 4, 4... loy,„,,,,, - M., tad as- ■• '' r -t-rt. r ' • • • • ••• 1 1. %*# iini 1 ni Mil tin I, e .'• . . , .. 2" . • 7' - • .. '..•••I Y..; • 1 04011••••• iigiV4k )4n :■,J , , 1••• t• L e- 1„. ' t .: tit. .-- : ' 4 JA ' cl -. 411 iiip , -,/ 11 6 \ - :. •;I:i .., .. ' - ; '. - • ' ' \ ‘ •?... i": 7, GUT T E R ..-- C-RCPPED CURB CORNER SIDEWALK DETAIL C ASE ;; ;,;(•"-t it .1:1 Vi oi . „7-111t , -7 -• DROPPED CURB 4 40,14 11.7 7 : 1 ;i 1e± : SIDEWALK VtI 4t.." rt; .rf • pt. rrit- 1 . 4 r V • ••• . r t t 4.1r r." .. t . li• • t rn. ;.•.-: . -'• ,' DRAiNAGE SWALE -- ...."•";; WHEEL .t • . CHAIR oir RAMP t..: 9-fik 1911 . . r ..• 1 : ; .k i — • • 1 .;"•••- .1 CORNER SIDEWALK DETAIL CASE 3 Y-1 SWALE - EA , 1,0=';r1. WHEEL t • , cHAR ie 4frvi1/4), RAMP IJtii DRAIN AGE SIDEWALK �i • ad „Jr- , • .1 e irIft "- • cu. 4 0 . 2 • ; F.•-•re • ittdi t , 1r. .• •• ,,.-• ttis• }I • ; ■,0 41,01-.":4.1 • / / • -it.: • ' 6 - • P. • • ,, e0$.2 ,- • • • `.1 N1cH.; GUTTER -•• URCPPED CURB o_ _ Casj CORNER SIDEWALK DETAIL 4 44 _4.2 • 1 , , ' CV I SioEyv c it- P. c.C. ob. Co/let tr- €4' - P.c.c. oR A. c-. Acce-ss. to 'el • • i .----, , ..„---------___ — .4. 4,.....0" .......... g 41 -----4*. • • • 113 C- o Atio Sae: .414-444-4 • . , — 4- — 4.� NOTE Driveway shall be constructed 4" in thickness, using APWA class 5 (I 1/2) or class 5(3/4)cement concrete. Sidewalk Width shown on street alms i 12' Mi 2 4 le' Compacted Subgrade fl rods Length and slope may vary Swole Dr inage /, 4( 1/ 5.75' • DRIVEWAY DETAIL 4 Sidewalk • .. "'n J � Sw / 3 /8" u Join` F�.VEMENT SECTION A -A PLAN VIEW - • IV •- • • • • • - • „ • • • Drivewoj shalt- be Constructed 4" in. - thickness using •APWA class 5 (I 1/2) or doss. 5(3/4) cement concrete: • t w ra (V Curb '0 A legifb ("soh m - ------ • • • - Thr • ' • • • • • 1 • , . • . - • , .• , _ d•sloo ar e moy vy: . 4 - - — ■ • . r ■ • PAVEMENT - ; r 127 41 • •:. • • SECTION:(2•:' t, ,::;: do - Curb crop C1/4+ _ - 6 1/411 poiAt3 • M•.) tEL DOwNS REA M OG — DRIVEWAY IMM EDIATELY .PREEC.DING-- - ";•DRI' , WSLL SHALL SE 'KT SA PA.E‘tSt- ..: AS DRXWELL: , . Q uantity Price Cost Completion % - - Monuments Barricade ( /) No . Fence. . -_ . • . S 1 Side(s) - S Side(s) Si Si SicIe(s) Si Side( Side(s) Sldeks) .. . RG •,.•:.:- • 1 -2 ° ; co • gooL , 87 go 3 — -‘ • . . I 2:0 . , z c, /7. 2-s , . C( t n - R C7 04-Ci — ci wide . , • BC IC ! ,. 5 z.s ,4-.q _ .3.,i,s"' — . . . - , • 4' 101 le .. ()ILipsloic ' A-I "e'' 4' 6 - /7 7 9 zd i a ) . 2,32: i c ..r deCO Bo ' BC TC_ AC de(s) 'RG' : BC.- . TC 1 , de( RG .. BC .- AC de( s) RG ' AC '' de( s ) s) BC 4 TC JAC , ;_:_: __ . - .7 a ' '2_ /..ci 9 1. z_s • /010 _.::,;.;:__4.. . • • , . .. 4-6 wide 5,73P )4 89 7,•575,2-17- ),3 2.1____- c, . . .5 4:4. 74-5, tv I � ---- • ' ' .. C-4-6- -. j, Walk? • . Wattes ie-f Auc.,. '' ' ' i 4- 7 S 3_2. 5 9 2 , - '7 _ -.. L- : ' . 5 z.2--S _ J coo R . C. 0 /9 , 0 0 "vr - 1 2_ ' wide . • 4:, . ,-- - - - ;I.. ": • • C & G - 6' „ ITE - 1 -- . iris Ro . 4 . 41 . / ; . - . / i , I 2. •--------- 4 wide - __7,_z_s _ _42...s_o • .... .2 ' Walk"' irOala..S'A A-Li (j 4 )44 '75" 3. IC 4.'";•00 cle 0" • /t, 8 (2 2_.-.7_ 5 _ 9: oci• ISG8 '-z.: c.. ,:; ) 0 9 60 .• 7• • ', .4 -2 . - E L G 3../.3. 410 f_1 1,43 c* _ .535),,_,T __' . ' - ' ,-,-.:.': :2: _ . - . : 1 _ _ .:_ __ _ . - - • _ . • ,. ' C ice - t ' Walk - • • . .. S t...,"-, en r;'• fr- gt cji 'ar - • "2. 4 ....L.2, - - • -2_1 _3ek Le - :.:" '- - ' 5 59_ ' 2 : °+ " I S ‘ _ 4484 2 as a . . 3 f ? 00 -,.. - • . zSLS :37 wide - ' •',.... • , . • C-& . R to t b , A c -'' 4 _ _4-_,_2-_9___ • )1-•-e9 ?7C _ .._9_-Pc • 4413 ° .5, - - • z.... , ‘z- 2- _. : 1 2 1.- ". • C.cdir la wa- -s t : ': . • I.,M 5 (DELL) A-Lts L -- 6 NAME --leg2-P•A( 4MS ITEM 1) 2) 4.3) 4) 7) 8) 9) • DATE '` - I —00 TOTAL USE \I 4 ., Quantity Price Cost Conpletior % Precast Drywell - Std. Z I _A, 700` Noo Precast Drywell - Dbl. )? L "A OA lI 0 Q: — Backfil l for DW 74d cy 5365€:- Concrete Inlet r-A, 650 0 C7}1iP ? Dia. _______..5 , ° 5 - cniPpipe /D " . Dia. 014 J am . /19oA' pipe Dia. - . pipe Dia. Precast Manhole Ditch Excavation _ -3S yA /f Rd` .35 'ySail) / 5� 7923 Sod = I9 - +a /-r" A . /9 A-LisZ7.2 e 1 ° 86.09 I wit. Reke /-,l ea wa /I °' C , ( 4 'x 1.3\ \ - -6 yea X 20>= /S 2S3-:" . /809— Sub Total 96791=' Contingencies 4Z7,-121- TOTAL Drainage 9101.5"' PROJECT F)UMMERFIELO FAST NAME CT NE-LoN ITE 6 DATE Std. Bdl. Dwl Conc. /c'Dia. Page Dwl Dwl BKF Inlet Jpe. • 1 6p 0 / SS 7 INSPECTOR DATE 8 /I/ 30 Dia. raucorHER pRintasib - tripe' 7440' 2.0 3.5 °° I c9-a 0 q 52 -7, ® A r T NV'IRONMENTAL: :.1 STATEMENT Lead Agency: Spokane County Date of Issue: October 31, 1978 Date Comments Due: December 5, 1978 DRAFT &NVIRONMLNTAL IMPACT STATEMENT St}IMERFIELD EAST Prepared for William W. Main Investment Co. and T. D. C. Inc. INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CORP. E. 12720 Nora Spokane, Washington 99216 INTRODUCTION The proposed action under review is for a 268 lot residential preliminary plat and zone reclassification from the Agricultural Zone to the Single Family Residential Zone. Both the preliminary plat and zone reclassification applications have been submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for public hearings. The proposed action was initiated by William W. Main Investment Company and T. D. C. Inc. The 91 acre site is located in the Spokane Valley, north of Wellesley Avenue, hest of Sullivan Road and east of Evergreen Road. The lead agency for this proposal is Spokane County, and the responsible official is Fred Dayharsh, Director of the Spokane County Planning Department, N. 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington 99260; telephone (5091 456 -2274. The proposed action may require the following legal actions and permits: (1' Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements; (21 Zone reclassification approval; (31 Preliminary and Final Plat approval of Sumnerfield East; (4t Approvals or permits from the Spokane County Health District, the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services and the Washington State Department of'Eoology for design and operation of a sewage disposal system; and (51 The obtaining of all required building permits, inspections and approvals. Copies of this document may be obtained from the Spokane County Planning Department for the cost of reproduction and mailing. This Draft Environmental Impact In order to be incorporated public comments and remarks by received by the Spokane County Washington 99260, on or before Statement was issued on October 31, 1978. into the Final Environmental Impact Statement, consulted agencies or individuals must be Planning Department, N. 721 Jefferson, Spokane, December 5, 1978. This Draft Environmental Impact Statement was prepared by Inland Pacific Engineering and Construction Company. Data required to produce this document may be obtained at the following address: Inland Pacific Engineering & Construction Corp. E. 12720 Nora Avenue Spokane, Washington 99216 i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION i LIST OF MAPS AND FIGURES 'LIST OF TABLES AND CHARTS iv DISTRIBUTION LIST SUMMARY OF THE CONf'N'S OF THE DRAFT EIS vi DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL 1 IMPACT ANALYSIS 6 LIST OF ELEMENTS OF THE ENVIRONMENT 6 Elements of the Physical Environment 9 1. Earth 9 2. Air 14 3. Water 20 4. Flora 34 5. Fauna 36 6. Noise 37 7. Light and Glare 39 8. Land Use 39 9. Natural Resources 43 10. Risk of Explosion or Hazardous Emission 44 Elements of the Human Environment 45 1. Population 45 2. Economics 47 3. Housing - 48 4. Transportation /Circulation 49 5. Public Services 52 6. Energy 58 7. Utilities 60 8. Human Health 63 9. Aesthetics 63 10. Recreation 63 11. Archaeological/Historical 64 12. Additional Population Characteristics 64 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT-TERM USrs OF MAN'S ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINrENANcE AND ENHANCEMENT OF LONG -TERM PRODUCTIVITY 55 IRREVERSIBLE AND /OR IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS OF RESCLTRCES 66 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSAL 67 FOOTNOTES 72 APPENDICES A 73 APPENDICES B 81 APPENDICES C 83 ii 1 1 1 1 1 1 1� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LIST OF MAPS AND FIGURES Vicinity Map 3 Area Map 4 Site Plan 5 Soils Map 10 Topography Map 13 Aquifer Location and Seismic Profile 23 Aquifer Transmissivity Distribution 25 Water Sampling Location 27 Water Quality 30 Water Service Locations 33 Land Use Map 40 Zoning Map 42 Average Daily Traffic Count Map 50 iii LISP OF TABLES AND CHARTS Suspended Particulate Summary 15 1976 Carbon Monoxide Levels 17 Arithmetic Mean of "208" Study Wells 28 208 Irvin Well Arithmetic Mean by Depth 29 Population Growth in the Spokane Area 45 Population Projecticn for Spokane County 46 Schools Impacted by Project 55 Available Parks and Recreational Facilities 56 iv DISTRIBUTION LIST U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle U. S. Soil Conservation Service, Spokane Wash. State Department of Commerce and Economic Development, Spokane Wash. State Department of Ecology, Olympia (2) (Note: 1 copy to SEPA Register+ Wash. State Ecological Commission Dept. of Ecology, Olympia Wash. State Dept. of Ecology, Spokane Wash. State Department of Fisheries, Olympia. Wash. State Department of Game, Spokane Wash. State Department of Game, Olympia Wash. State Department of Transportation, Olympia Wash. State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia Wash. State Department of Social and Health Services, Olympia Wash. State Department of Natural Resources, Colville Wash. State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia Wash. State Office of Programming, Planning, & Fiscal Management, Olympia Wash. State Utilities and Transportation Commission, Olympia Wash. State Energy Office, Olympia Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority, Spokane County Building Department, Spokane County Engineering Department, (51 Spokane County Park & Recreation Department, Spokane County Planning Commission, (7) Spokane County Planning Department (20) Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney, Civil Division (21 Spokane County Health District, Environmental Health Division (31 Spokane County Fire District No. 1 Spokane County Conservation District Spokane County Public Library (21 Spokane Regional Planning Conference (21 City of Spokane Public Library (1) City of Spokane Planning Department Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company Washington Water Pacer Company Spokane Community Press The Spokesman Review The Spokane Daily Chronicle Spokane Valley Herald East Valley High School East Valley Junior High School Trentwood Elementary School East Valley School District No. 361 U. S. Postal Service, Opportunity Branch Mr. Morey Haggin Trentmccd Irrigation District No. 3 Valley Garbage Service Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce v SUrv4AR( OF THE CONPENPS OF THE DRAFT EIS Purpose and Objectives The sponsors visualize Sumnerfield Fast as a response to the rapid growth the Spokane area is experiencing. It is the intent of the sponsors to economically provide an environmentally planned residential development to include a public water system, paved and curbed streets, storm drainage facilities, sewage treatment facilities designed to meet the approval of the Spokane County Health District, and underground utilities. It is anticipated that the project will provide a full range of housing units which will include housing opportunities for younger families with moderate incomes. Proposal The proposed project is a planned residential development of approximately 91 acres with 268 lots, which will require the approval of a preliminary plat and zone reclassification by the Spokane County Board of Commissioners. The site is located in the Spokane Valley, north of Wellesley Avenue, south of the Forker Road - Progress Road intersection, and west of Progress Road. The development is planned to be phased over a six -year period of time with 48 homes to be constructed in 1979 and with 44 units constructed each year for a five -year period. Project phasing, however, will be subject to market conditions. Summary Impact Analysis The analysis addresses Direct and Indirect Impacts, Mitigating measures and Unavoidable Adverse Impacts. v i Elements of the Physical Environment 1. Earth Direct and Indirect Impacts Disruption, displacement, compaction and overcovering of soil will occur, as well as minimal alteration of topographical contours, which may result in minor wind and water erosion during the construction phase. Approximately 25 percent of the site will consist of paving and structures. Mitigating Measures Containment of earth movement within roadway corridors and foundation areas. Replacement of soils where disturbed. The design of streets and homesites in harmony with local topography. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Minor reconfiguration of approximately 25 percent of the site. Increased erosion potential during the construction phase. 2. Air Direct and Indirect Impacts Short term air quality degradation will result during the construction phase, with increased suspended particulate and equipment carbon monoxide emissions. Long term impacts will result from increased vehicular emissions and from home heating units. Ambient increases are not to exceed Federal levels. Future sewage collection systems may generate obnoxious odors. Mitigating Measures During construction, dust will be controlled by use of water; and phasing will localize the source of suspended particulate emissions. Paving of roadways and the enforcement of County air quality standards will mitigate vehicular related emission increases. Public transportation should be encouraged. 3. Water Direct and Indirect Impacts Surface water movement and runoff /absorption will be altered as a result of impervious surfaces covering approximately 25 percent of the site. The , project will rot increase the hazard of flooding in the area; however, existing flooding along Forker Road may impact the project. vii There are three sources that may impact ground water quality: Approximately 30,000 gallons of waste water per day, storm water runoff and the use of chemicals (fertilizer, herbicides, etc.) . Waste water disposal may be considered the most significant source, but the quality of the potential effluent reaching the aquifer from a subsurface drainfield will be improved over the quality of the effluent discharged to the drainfield because of biochemical treatment mechanisms that occur as the effluent passes through the soil column above the ground water. (Soil column ranges in depth from 80 to 110 feet) . To try to quantify the impacts of this development to the aquifer quality would be extremely difficult, if not futile. The "208" Water Quality Management Program, being conducted by Spokane County in cooperation with the U.S.G.S., U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Washington State Department of Ecology, have not to date provided any definite conclusion regarding recharge of the aquifer by drainfield, storm water effluent, or chemical use over the aquifer. It is anticipated that in the near future, the "208" will have a Cause and Effect Report dealing with the impact of urbanization on the aquifer. Current data indicates the edges of the aquifer show generally higher levels of pollutants than the main by of the aquifer. It is estimated that the project will result in the withdrawal of approximately 532,000 gallons of water per day at peak flaw (summertime use Trentwcod Irrigation District will provide water for domestic use and for required fire flow. Mitigating Measures A Spokane County Storm Water Management. Plan would mitigate the drainage problems caused by runoff in the Forker Road drainage basin. In addition, two methods of controlling storm water from this basin are available to the project sponsor and are identified in the Summerfield East Storm Drainage Report (see Appendix Al. Increases in runoff, a result of impervious surfaces, will be mitigated by the provision of on -site disposal, with use of drywalls, curbs, gutters and appropriate street design. Proper drainfield site selection, proper installation operation and maintenance will mitigate the potential for ground water contamination. The installation of dry -line sewers will allow for more flexible sewering alternatives in the future which may mitigate the potential for ground water contamination. The ground water impact could be mitigated by reducing the density of the proposal. However, a lower density project may exclude a number of sewer alternatives. viii Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There is a possibility of drainfield effluent or surface water runoff reaching the aquifer. The "208" Water Quality Management Program is being conducted to determine the extent and magnitude of contamination. The long term commitment of water from the aquifer to serve the project should be considered unavoidable 4. Flora Direct and Indirect Impacts The project will result in the permanent disruption of current prime agricultural soils for road right -or -ways and h mesites. The existing flora will be replaced with lawns, shrubs, trees and backyard gardens. Mitigating Measures The permanent disruption of the current agricultural land may be mitigated by the introduction of lawns, shrubs, trees, flowers and backyard gardens. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Permanent removal of agricultural crops on site. 5. Fauna Direct and Irxdirect Impacts A decrease in the number and /or diversity of wildlife that inhabit the area will occur. Mitigating Measures The retention of as much natural vegetation as possible, as well as the introduction of landscaping. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The permanent removal and disruption of a portion of the wildlife habitat is an unavoidable adverse impact. ix 6. Noise Direct and Indirect Impacts Increases in noise levels during the construction _phase and during suburban residential period will occur. Noise will be generated vehicle traffic and construction activities. the from Mitigating Measures The increase in noise levels may be mitigated by limitation of construction activities to normal working hours, by noise buffering provided by home insulation and by the use of proper mufflers and vehicle- quieting devices. Unavoidable Impacts The increased noise levels resulting from the construction phase and from the suburban residential period may be considered an unavoidable adverse impact to some, but the increases will not exceed State and Federal standards. 7. Light and Glare Direct and Indirect Impacts Artificial light will be required for street lighting, interior and exterior residential use, and for nighttime vehicle use. Mitigating Measures The use of low intensity street lighting, as well as generous use of landscaping and careful planning when determining exact building locations, will help to reduce the impacts of light and glare. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The project will result in increases in light and glare 8. Land Use Direct and Indirect Impacts The project will result in a change in the land use of the site from a vacant parcel used for agricultural purposes to a single family development. The 91 acre site is proposed for a 268 lot subdivision, (gross density of 2.9 lots per gross acre4, a density that would be compatible with the surrounding residential uses and compatible with the "Generalized comprehensive Plan, Spokane metropolitan Area." x Mitigating Measures With the use of an Architectural Control Ct. ittee, restrictive covenants, the application of controls available with planning, zoning and subdivision regulations, and the establishment of an orderly pattern of development and project phasing, adverse land use impact could be mitigated. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Those who desire to maintain the site in its present rural state may view the proposed land use as an unavoidable adverse impact. 9. Natural Resources Direct and Indirect Impacts During the' construction phase of the project building, materials will be consumed; and during the suburban residential period, energy in the form of fuels will be consumed. Prime agricultural soils on the site will be devoted to residental land use. Mitigating Measures Conservation techniques during the construction phase and during the sub- urban residential period may minimize the consumption of natural resources. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The project will consume natural resources during the construction phase and during the residential period. In addition, the use of pure agricultural soils for residential soils is unavoidable. 10. Risk of Explosion or Hazardous Emissions N/A Elements of the Human Environment 1. Population Direct and Indirect Impacts Sumnerfield East will provide 268 lots for the same number of single- family residential units, to be constructed over a six -year period of tine. Assuming the population multiplier of 3.5 persons per single family dwelling, the completed project will provide housing for 933 persons. Mitigating Measures Careful planning and the development and implementation of land use regulation can reduce population impacts. x i Unavoidable Adverse Impacts A population increase in this area may be considered by some as an unavoidable and adverse impact. 2. Housing Direct and Indirect Impacts Sumnerfield East will provide 258 lots for 268 single- family residential units, with home selling prices ranging from $40,000 to $85,000. Mitigating Measures Project phasing will tend to ease the impact along with careful planning and the implementation of land -use regulations. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Housing increases in this area may be considered by some as an unavoidable and adverse impact. 3. Economics Direct and Indirect Impacts The project will require expenditures for payrolls and for the purchase of materials, supplies and services, while the completed project will increase the assessed taxable value of the site and the proposed improvements to $16,750,000.00 (19781 Mitigating Measures None Unavoidable Adverse Impacts None 4. Transportation /Circulation Direct and Indirect Impacts The project will create an estimated 2,144 one -way vehicle trips per day. The t::nsportation and circulation pattern of the area should remain the same even with the proposed increases. The existing primary and secondary roads proposed to serve the site can handle the increased capacity. xii 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r The project will include an extensive internal roadway system that will integrate with the existing roadway network and will be curbed and paved. The increase in traffic generated by the project will also increase traffic hazards. Mitigating Measures The development of public transportation, car pooling, the encouragement of bicycle and pedestrian traffic, and street layouts which discourage high speeds, with adequate traffic controls, such as stop signs, where needed, will mitigate potential transportation hazards. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Increased traffic volumes and hazards in the vicinity of the site are unavoidable adverse impacts. S. Public Services Direct and Indirect Impacts Additional services will be required from many public agencies as a result of the project, including Fire District No. 1, the Spokane County Sheriff's Department and the Washington State Patrol, East Valley School Distr.ict_.No. 361, park departments, maintenance agencies, health departments, etc. Mitigating Measures The increased demand for public services as a result of the project will be mitigated by the increased property tax revenue generated by the project. The impact on the schools will be mitigated by the expansion of Facilities provided through special levies and tax dollars. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts This project will increase the demands for fire and police protection, educational and recreational facilities, and for the maintenance of the above mentioned and other governmental services. Delivery of these services, at least initially, exceeds any offset due to increased tax dollars. 6. Energy Direct and Indirect Impacts The project will require energy during the construction phase and it is estimated that the development, when completed, will consume approximately 10.9 million kilowatt hours of electricity per year and an estimated 134,000 therms per year of natural gas ;based on heating needs of 25 percent of the projects. Current energy sources are adequate to serve the project. Irrlirect increases in consumption of energy and fossil fuels can be expected. Mitigating Measures Energy conservation techniques for home use will' mitigate energy consumption impacts. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The project will result in increased consumption of energy for heating, cooking, lighting, general household use and transportation. 7. Utilities Direct and Indirect Impacts The project will result in increased demands on communication service from the Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, energy from Washington Water Power Company (see Energy, Section No. 6), water from Trentaood Irrigation District, on -site sewage disposal and storm drainages, and solid waste from Valley Garbage Service. Mitigating Measures Close coordination between the project sponsor and the affected utilities should mitigate potential impacts. Approval of on -site sewage disposal and storm drainage systems by the appropriate State and County agencies. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The project will result in increases in utility service. 8. Human Health ;Refer to Section 5 "Other Governmental Services'h . 9. Aesthetics N/A 10. Recreation ;Refer to Section 5 "Parks and Other Recreational Facilities "). xiv 11. Archaeological/Historical Direct and Indirect Impacts A slight possibility of the unearthing of archaeological finds on the site exists. Mitigating Measures Contractors can be made aware of potential archaeological finds, what to look for, and what to do if something is found. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Possible disturbance of subsurface archaeological resources. 12. Additional Population Characteristics N/A xv No Action Alternatives The site would remain in agricultural production, but because of the continued growth in the East Valley area, no action today would most likely result in a delay in the eventual development of the site. Development Presently Permitted The site has the Agricultural Zone (AI classification, a land use classification for an area suitable for farming and agricultural pursuits. Development under this alternative could result in similar if not more severe adverse environmental impacts than those identified for the proposed action. Project Implementation in the Future Could result in demands for a more intensive future development due to increased costs. Alternative Site Project sponsors do not own a similar parcel of land with similar locational advantages. If there was an alternate site available, the same environmental elements, traffic, site development, air quality, water quality, raise, light, glare, utilities and services, etc., would be impacted. (Less ground water impact if site not located over aquifer.) Alternative Densities A lower density development would mitigate impacts on air, traffic, noise; utiliies, public services, etc., but would result_ in higher per unit cost of housing, utilities and services, and could reduce the number of sewage alternatives. A higher density development would increase the environmental impacts, but would allow for less expensive housing, utilities and services; and allow for more revenue to be used toward mitigation of the adverse impacts. Sewage Alternatives Septic Tank - Drainfield - will function with minimum maintenance, does not centrally collect effluent, does not provide flexibility for future sewer alternatives, allows for individual home owner maintenance and operation, and may have an impact on ground water. Central Collection Treatment - provides a minimum of primary and secondary treatment of effluent, eliminates the need for individual home owners to operate and maintain a separate system, thus assuring better maintenance, and may have an .impact on ground water. xvi DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL A. Name of Proposal and Sponsors The William W. Main Investment Company and T.D.C. Incorporated of Spokane, Washington propose to develop approximately 91 acres for a planned residential development to be called "Summerfield East " B. Location of Project The proposed project is located in the eastern portion of the Spokane Valley lying north of Wellesley Avenue, south of the Forker Road - Progress Road intersection, and west of Progress Road as shown on the following vicinity map. The site occupies a portion of Section 35, Township 26N., Range 44 East W. M., in Spokane County, Washington. A complete legal description of the Summerfield East property is included in the Appendix to the EIS. C. Reference of Files This project is on file with the Spokane County Planning Department as Preliminary Subdivision Number PE- 1206 -78 and Zone Reclassification ZE -78 at N. 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, Washington. D. Project Phasing The anticipated date for initial development of Summerfield East is the spring of 1979, at which time 48 single- family residential units would be constructed. The project will then be implemented over an additional 5 -year period in annual phases with 44 new residences constructed each year. It should be noted that the phasing of this project is subject to market demand and may be subject to change. Therefore, this document addresses the project as a whole and is designed to identify the cumulative impacts of the whole development when completed. E. Action Description The proposed project is a planned residential development of approximately 91 acres consisting of 268 lots, with a gross density of 2.9 lots per gross acre. Lot sizes will vary, but a typical lot will have 30 feet of public -road frontage and a total of 10,000 square feet of area. In addition, there will be three one acre suburban tracts fronting on Forker Road. The project will be served by an internal road network which will be paved and curbed and will link the project to Wellesley Avenue on the south. All roads will be constructed prior to occupancy of the home sites. Emphasis has been place on gently curving streets and short cul-de -sacs to encourage a quiet residential environment. Three pedestrian paths (easements) are proposed to connect Trentwood Elementary School with the project and its internal road network. For further,discussion of the internal road systems serving the site and necessary improvements, see page 49. The project will be provided electricity by the Washington Water Power Company; and water by the Trentwood Irrigation District. The sponsors have proposed a sewage disposal system utilizing individual septic tanks and including dry -line sewering. The dry -line sewers will allow for more flexible sewering alternatives in the future. All utilities will be underground. Storm drainage facilities will be designed and provided to dispose of surface water runoff according to the requirements of the Spokane County Utilities Department. The project is in the immediate vicinity of three school sites: Trentwood Elementary, East Valley Junior High and East Valley High School. The selling price for the lots within this proposed development will range from $8,000 to $12,000, which is anticipated to generate housing which will range in cost from $40,000 to $85,000. F. Existing Land Use Plans and Zoning Regulations The site is located within Spokane County and is consequently under the jurisdiction of the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Regulations. The "Generalized Comprehensive Plan, Spokane Metropolitan Area" (last revised and approved on October 22, 1968) designates the site for residential neighborhood use. The site currently has the Agricultural Zone Classification (A) , a land -use classification designating an area suitable for farming and agricultural pursuits, including cultivation of land, fruit raising, truck farming, livestock production, dairying, poultry raising and forestry. Commercial and industrial activities unrelated to agriculture are orohibited. 2 SPOKANE CO. STEVENS CO. a -J 0 0 o. C Q 4 w 4 *lie- of._ ,I., 'T me e..r- op 1-01-4 i- be a 44... L.A 1 t.. if 4 t 1 (AV" ,0 act. ff ) L-01 a.t.. 1 .-c-4t-a. J 4. k...0 es it..009...44 Vc .,fr.L SO' 0 fr-L. fts.e.e.e... op pi...e.? , 1 MN SS SI MI IIIII NM IS NW NB SUN MI • OM " Fit 4 of .41e-....1 ; ./. /G7\, • 4 -a 1 1 01 -t- 14*t4h40 10' • . . ' : ' 1 • , - .:. I - I n i _... . . , . . - •---i, , •,,-.-„—..--1-, ,r. • I_ ...1.. . (_ _'' 1 I ' ; I I. t .. . a ,--,' - - -- —L.' - 4-4 / i r ' - — . • - • --1..: __,' • ' ' 1. '' 1 _,H .., . . '. .1 ! i "... • __.i ■._:_ J F ; ' 0 • . . • , I ' I II 1 I ; rf ."..s. -, ..-e5 - I ..-Ti — - 9-.04-4 trk4H.S4f - C al , itiLt PO- ( obi .5 . t. 9 2.2 - 1.00 . • ta-1.410460.1061 cot.Ife-tic-flosi ••-16.1 fob! - bcc. OtplarterLaitittkitiettailieitmoop.‘4944-f rn t..(1 ... 4 ex) - wise, 4 SITE PLAN o 100 300 500 1 ' FEET • SO 200 400 . • , . • . 5 The following is a list required to be addressed "N /A" (rot applicable) will not significantly analysis. The Impact Analysis is a detailed discussion of each category and addresses the following: (11 a. b. c . d. Existing Conditions of the Environment. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action on the Environment. Measures to Mitigate the Adverse Impacts. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts resulting if action is taken. ELEMENTS OF THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT x (a, EARTH. x (iv x (iiv x (lib N/A (ivi x (vi N/A (vii x (be AIR. x is x ( x (c1 PATER. N/A (iv x ( ii1 x ( iii) N/A (ivi N/A (IA x (vil x (vii, x (viiii x (ix x (di FLORA. x (iv x (ii1 N/A (iii) x (iv1 of those elements of the environment which may be as per WAC- 197 -10 -444. The elements noted as have been deemed as areas the proposed action affect, and are not addressed in the impact Air quality. Odor. Climate. IMPACT ANALYSIS Geology. Soils. Topography. Unique physical features. Erosion. Accretion /avulsion. Surface water Movement. Runoff /absorption. Floods. Surface water quantity. Surface water quality. Ground water movement. Ground water quantity. Ground water quality. Public water supplies. Numbers of diversity of species. Unique Species. Barriers and /or. corridors. Agricultural crops. 6 x (e1 FAUNA. x (il Numbers or diversity of species. x (ii) Unique species. N/A (iiil Barriers and /or corridors. N/A (iv1 Fish or wildlife habitat. x (fl NOISE. x (gl LIGHT AND GLARE. x (hl LAND USE. x (i1 NATURAL RESOURCES x !il Rate of Use. N/A (iil Nonrenewable resources. N/A (7s RISK OF EXPLOSION OR HAZARDOUS EMISSIONS. (21 ELEAENIS OF THE HUMAN ENVIRC MENT. x (a) POPULATION. x (b) HOUSING. x (c1 TRANSPORTATION /CIRCULATION. x (i1 Vehicular transportation generated. NA (iil Parking facilities. x (iiil Transportation systems. x (iv1 Movement /circulation of people or goods. N/A (v1 Waterborne, rail and air traffic. x (vil Traffic Hazards. x (dl PUBLIC SERVICES x (il Fire. x (iil Police. x (iiii Schools. x (ivi Parks or other recreational facilities. x (v) Maintenance. x (vi1 Other governmental services. x (el ENERGY. x (il Amount required. x (ill Source /availability. x (fl UTILITTFg. x (i) Energy. x (HI Communications. x ( iiil Water. x (iv1 Sewer. x (v1 Storm Water. x (vi1 Solid Waste. 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 x (gi HUMAN HEALTH (including mental health,. N/A (hi AESTHETICS. x (1' RECREATICY.N. x (jw ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL. N/A (kw ADDITIONAL POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS. x (1) ECONC MIC IMPACT. Elements of the Physical Environment 1. Earth 1.1 Geology a. Existing Conditions Igneous and metamorphic rocks covered by glacial and flood deposits from the Pleistocene epoch form the foundation of the Spokane Valley floor. The site is covered by flood deposits (QE) from the Great Missoula Flood of prehistoric times and consists of boulders, cobbles, and gravel, mixed with sand in places. These deposits are mostly very coarse, very poorly sorted, and open - textured; marginal parts contain various proportions of flcod- transported sand and gravel, reworked kame and lake deposits, and locally derived detritus. The northwest section of the property abuts the base of Pleasant Prairie Bench, a stratified geologic structure of kames and 'kame delta deposits (QKS) of the Bull Lake Age. There are no apparent geological hazards within the site or proximity thereof. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The proposed project should not result in unstable earth coalitions or in changes in geologic structures. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts None d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts None 1.2 Soils a. Existing Conditions The soils of the site are variable, resulting from a combination of glacial till, and sedimentary residuum. As shown on the following soil map, the soils are of the Garrison Series and consist of Garrison gravelly loam (GgA) and Garrison very -gravelly loam (GmBI. Garrison gravelly loam (GgA) is the dominant soil of the Garrison Series on the project site and also for a majority of the Spokane Valley. Its surface color, when moist, ranges from very dark brown to black. The texture of the surface layer is gravelly loam or silt loam. The subsoil 9 Spokane M c B B a B extremely rocky comp /es 20'70 More /e sandy loom, 0 Barnhill silt loom percent slope sb• _ 0 slope Spokane very rocky comp /ex 30 slope Gone on grove //y /oom, 0 %s /ope WELLESLEY AVE. Gorr /son very gravelly boom , 0 8% slope Bern// // / sill loam moderately shallow 1" 0 slope w W 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ranges in color from dark brown to yellowish brown. Clay and lime have accumulated on the bottoms of the pebbles in the lacer subsoil. The depth to the gravel substratum ranges from 30 to 55 inches. The soil is somewhat excessively drained and has moderately rapid permeability. Surface runoff is slaw, the hazard of erosion is slight, there is negligible risk of .slope instability, and the soil has a law potential for exhibiting shrink -swell behavior. There is no danger of frost action. Garrison very gravelly loam (GmB) has a thinner, more gravelly surface layer than Garrison gravelly loam, a rurn Ef potential ranging from slow to medium and an erosion hazard range from slight to moderate. The soil depth to bedrock on the site is more than 84 inches and the soils have a slight erosion potential according to the Soil Conservation Service classification system data. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The proposed development will require temporary disruptions, displacements, compaction, uncovering, and overcovering of soils during the construction of streets, utilities, building foundations and driveways. Generally, these impacts will be in the form of the various construction activities related to the development of the project. These activities will include grading, trenching and excavation for roads, underground' utility lines and basements. It is not expected that these soils will be removed from the site but will be redistributed on -site as part of individual lot develop- ment. Once the project is developed, approximately 25 percent of the soils will be covered by asphalt streets, driveways, homes and accessory structures. The remainder of the site will, most likely, be landscaped according to the taste of the individual homeowner. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts The disruption and displacement of soils during construction of the houses, accessory structures, streets, storm drainage structures, and during the extension of power lines, telephone lines and television cables, will be mitigated by returning the affected soils to their original condition. In addition, the containment of earth movement within street right - of-way corridors, foundation areas, and other site areas requiring reconfiguration of the existing soils will minimize the impact the proposed residential development will have on existing soils. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts With 25 percent of the soils on the site proposed to be covered by impervious surfaces; temporary disruptions, displacements, 0:impaction, uncovering, and overcovering of soils during the construction phase will take place. 11 1.3 Topography a. Existing Conditions The site is essentially flat and slopes at approximately 2/3 of 1 percent from northeast to southwest. The map on the following page shows the site's topography as a gently rolling, relatively flat plain with the steeper slopes of the Pleasant Prairie hills lying northwest of the project. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action No significant alterations in the topography of the site are anticipated as a result of the project. The impacts which will occur will take place during the construction phase of the project with earthmoving and excavations associated with roadway cuts and with grading for homesites. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts The design of streets and lots in harmony with the existing topography will minimize the potential impacts on surface relief features. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The minor reconfiguration of approximately 25 percent of the total site for roads and structures is an unavoidable adverse impact. 1.4 Unique Physical Features N/A 1.5 Erosion a. Existing Conditions The soils on the site are of the Garrison Series and have a slight erosion potential. In addition, the terrain is gently sloping and covered in residual vegetation, factors which also help to reduce the erosion potential. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action During the construction phase of the project, there will be some removal of soil cover and earthmoving on -site for the preparation of building sites and roads, and in the placement of water, sewer, and other utility lines. But because of the slight slope of the site, it is not expected that there will be any significant water - related erosion problem. wind may present a slight erosion problem over exposed soils, but considering the normal weather coalitions on the site, this problem should be nominal. 12 IMINIMMIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIISIMMININNIIIINIII•1111111MMINNIIIIIIMMINIIIII c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts Potential erosion during the construction phase may be reduced by project phasing and the use of water to hold down dirt. After construction, the development's impervious surfaces, storm drainage features, and landscaping will minimize the potential of wind and water erosion. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts During construction of the project, a minimal increase in erosion potential from water and wind is unavoidable. 1.6 Accretion/Avulsion N/A 2. Air 2.1 Air Quality a. Existing Conditions The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency has established standards for six classes of primary air pollutants which include: suspended particulates, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, photochemical oxidants and hydrocarbons. The State of Washington has also established air quality .standards for the same six classes of air pollutants. The Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority (SCAPCA) maintains an air - monitoring network throughout Spokane area, and has determined that ambient concentrations of suspended particulates and carbon monoxide exceed both the Washington State and the Federal standards in heavily traveled areas of Spokane County, most notably during times of poor dispersal because of climatic conditions. Suspended particulates consist of finely divided solid or liquid particles which remain suspended in the atmosphere. It is estimated that particulates have diameters of 10 microns or less and have little settling velocity. Suspended particulates include stroke and various dusts, and have proven to increase the incidence of respiratory illness and can cause the reduction of visibility, and excessive soiling of exposed materials. The sources of suspended particulates include industrial sources, residential heating, agricultural activities, internal fuel combustion and traffic over unpaved roads, driveways and parking areas. It is estimated that 40 percent of the total particulate emisions in the Spokane Metropolitan area are produced from the automobile and traffic over unpaved surfaces. Suspended particulate concentrations have been recorded at various Spokane monitoring stations and a summary of these concentrations is found on the following page. The primary Federal ambient air standards require that the 14 annual geometric mean "TSP" levels not exceed 75 m :rograms per cubic meter of air. The secondary "TSP" standard has 60 micrograms per cubic meter of air limit, which is exceeded over much of the Spokane Valley floor. SUSPENDED PARTICUTATE SUMMARY Station 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 Turnbull Wildlife Refuge 22.01 21.06 19.06 28 27 Rogers High School 67.04 55.12 58.81 73 73 City Hall 75.22 75.23 58.80 81 83 Gonzaga University 82.35 75.47 64.06 83 79 Zellerbach 86.12 89.96 79.64 149 131 Cheney City Hall 59.41 47.80 73 62 Millwood City Hall 59.30 59.02 74 77 Aluminum Supply Company 148.19 99.26 143 127 University City 97 75 Washington Water Power 82 70 Cooper Elementary 77 70 Sheridan Elementary -- 122 89 East Valley High School 63 41 Source: Spokane County Air Pollution Ccntrol' Authority. 15 ('l The project site is not located within the designated non- attainment area, (an area that exceeds Federal TSP standardsl. The East Valley High School, located just east of the project, is a iSP monitoring station which in 1977 recorded the lowest particulate level for any urban monitoring station in the county. Carbon monoxide is the product of It is estimated that 90 percent of gasoline - powered engine, while the units. incomplete combustion of fossil fuels. the carbon monoxide is generated by the remaining 10 percent is from heating Carbon monoxide is an odorless, colorless gas which can be fatal when exposed to high levels over an extended period of time. Federal ambient air standards require that carbon monoxide levels not exceed 9 ppm for an eight -hour average more than once per year. This standard is consistently exceeded within the Spokane Central Business District and along North Monroe and North Division streets below the hill. The Spokane Central Business District and portions of the Division and Monroe Street corridors have been designated as non- attainment areas for carbon nnnoxide by the Environmental Protection Agency. Carbon monoxide levels have also been recorded at various Spokane area monitoring stations and a summary of these levels is found on the following page. Carbon monoxide concentrations tend to be very localized and dependent to a large extent on local traffic volumes and congestion. It would be safe to conclude that the carbon monoxide concentrations near the site are substantially lower that Federal ambient air maximum levels. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action Completion of the project should not result in any significant air quality impacts. The development of the site will have an impact on the ambient air quality, first during the construction stage of the project and second during the operational phase. Air pollution during the construction phase of the development will result from dust from land clearing and construction activities, emissions from the operation of the construction equipment, and emissions from general construction - related traffic and paving operations. The principal source of air pollutants occurring after the development is the automobile. In addition, emissions from home- heating and air - conditioning systems, and from fireplaces will be air - pollutant contributors. 16 Trent Avenue Established 7/27/76. 5 Discontinued 7/9/76. 6 Established 7/23/76. 7 Discontinued 11/7/76. 8 Established 11/22/76. 9 1976 CARBON MONOXIDE LEVELS Total Total 1-hour 8 -hour 8 -hour Violation Station Maximum Maximum Violations Days 1 Department of Natural Resources 22 16 32 21 2 Peyton Building 24 19 43 35 3 Post Office 34 22 65 51 4 Columbia C 35 27 118 66 5 Division Street 21 16 17 13 6 Dart Apartments 39 17 29 26 7 Boone Street 16 12 5 6 8 Valley Chamber of Camnerce 12 9 0 0 9 Boone Street No. 2 31 16 7 7 Kershaw's 38 24 137 99 10 Mcnroe and Indiana 25 16 39 27 11 22 16 12 9 City Hall 31 21 57 45 1 Established 7/20/76. 2 Special CBD study, established 9/13/76. 3 Established 7/19/76. 4 Established 11 /23/76. 10 Source: Spokane County Air Discontinued 4/11/76. Pollution Control 11 Authority. Discontinued 3/25/76. 17 c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts During the construction phase of the project, dust will be controlled by water sprays and by dust poilutives. In addition, all construction will be conducted under the regulatory authority of SCP.PCA. To reduce motor vehicle related emissions, all roads should be paved, and the Federal Automobile Etission Control Standards should be implemented. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Unvoidable adverse impacts during construction would include any dust that proves uncontrollable, hydrocarbons through evaporation from asphalt, concrete, etc.; and emissions from the construction equipment. 2.2 Odor a. Existing Conditions There are no significant or unusual odors generated on the project site. The existing agricultural uses create no unusual or obnoxious odors. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The proposed development will not have a significant effect on odors in the area. During the construction phase of the project, odors may exist due to the construction and paving activities. No odors are expected from the development of septic -tank drainfields. The provision for dry -line sewers will, in the future, allow for the possibility of any number of sewage - collections systems; some of which may generate odors. In addition, the increase in vehicle traffic and emissions will increase the level of typical vehicle exhaust odors on the site. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts Proper operation and maintenance of sewage - disposal systems and implementation of Federal Automobile Emission Control Standards. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The proposed development will result in a minimal increase in odors as a result of the project construction, and an increase in motor vehicle emission odors and other odors typical of residential developments. The possibility of sewage- treatment facilities on site in the future may increase the potential for odors. 18 1 1 1 2.3 Climate a. Existing Conditions The site is located in the Spokane Valley, which has a temperate climate 1 with four distinct seasons. Precipitation averages 20 inches per year with the majority coming from October through June. Peak precipitation is normally in December in the form of snowfall. "In an average summer, 10 -20 thunderstorms occur between March and October with the greatest 1 frequency during the warmest months. (11 There are about 6,655 heating degree days in an average year (Base 65 degrees F or 18.3 degrees C). The highest temperatures expected are about 102 degrees F, (39 1 degrees 0 and the lowest probable winter temperatures are -24 degrees F ( -31 degrees 0. There are usually 120 to 130 frost -free days per year in the Spokane Valley. Sunny days are rare in the winter and normal 1 during the summer. Prevailing winds are from the southwest in simmer and from the northeast in winter. The average annual wind speed is about seven miles per hour (11 Kilometers/hour.. "Winds in excess of 25 miles per hour (40 km/hr1 are observed less than two percent of the time. Extreme 1 wind speed at 30 feet (9 meters) above the ground can be expected to reach or exceed 50 mph (80 km/hrl once in twa years, and 80 mph (129km/hr, once in 50 years." The average daily solar radiation is 359 Langleys ' (calories /square cnVhour). Considerably more is received in July (661 Langleys /day average) than in December (76 Langleys day average) . This means, generally, that Solar energy for home heating is least available when it is most needed. For solar cooling (evaporative ammonia and freon systems), sunlight is most available when it is most needed. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action 1 Local air flows may be somewhat altered by the construction of new buildings. No significant changes in temperatures, wind directions or velocity, humidity or precipitation is expected. 1 c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts i None d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts 1 None 1 1 3. Water 3.1 Surface Water Movement N/A 3.2 Runoff /Absorption a. Existing Conditions On site observations corroborated with material from the Soil Survey, Spokane County, Wash., verify that the soil is well drained. Presently, all on site precipitation is disposed of by direct absorption or evapotranspiration. There is little or no evidence of any surface runoff activity with a moisture holding capacity of about 0.1 inches /inch of soil and 40 inches (102 cn) of moisture in the upper layer of soil when saturated. Below that it is probable that this soil could hold an estimated .05 inches /inch (cm /crm for another 56" (142 cm1 or 2.8 inches (7.1 are of moisture for a total moisture holding capacity of 6.8 inches (17.3 c, . The deeper Garrison soils have less than five percent, by weight, of material which is 0.074 millimeters or less in diameter (fine sand) and less than 20 percent by weight, smaller than two millimeters in diameter (curse sand) . The observation of a ten foot deep (3.1 meters) excavation at the southwest corner of the project site showed considerable fires available even at that depth. With root growth evident to a depth of nine feet (2.8 meters it is obvious that the loamy strata of this Garrison soil was considerably deeper than the profile which was taken for the Spokane County Soil Study at Mission Road and Molter Road. Below the nine foot depth it appears that the soil is sufficiently coarse that moisture holding ability is sufficiently lacking to discourage root growth. From Table 24, Washington Climate, one can assume that evapotranspiration essentially depletes soil of excess moisture from April through October. Then from November through March about 10.5 inches (26.7 cmI by interpolation, of precipitation is received than is disposed of bv evapotranspiration. In a water budget analysis, moisture received (precipitation equals absorption plus evapotranspiration plus runoff. As was previously stated, there is no evidence of significant runoff. Absorption equals the amount retained by the soil plus groundwater recharge. From previous calculations, the amount of moisture retained is aproximately 6.8 inches (17.3cm) leaving 10.5 inches, minus 6.8 inches or 3.7 inches (9.4 cro of groundwater recharge, average, during winter months. Obviously, on very dry years, there may be little or no recharge, and on very wet years there could be more. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action Introduction of impervious surfaces such as roofs, driveways and paving could reduce the absorption rate by 30 percent on the project site. Roofs in Spokane do not tend to have rain gutters except short lengths over entry ways. For those with rain gutters, rain water either falls on a splash block and is abosrbed in lawn, or a small dry well is provided for absorption. Normally little, if any, of this runoff from roofs 20 reaches street gutters. Uphill driveways from this type of project would contribute as much as 700 to 800 square feet of impervious surface per home site. Downhill driveways are normally equipped with drains and drywells. The topography on this site is so flat that it is anticipated that almost all garages will be slightly above street level. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Effects Where runoff is increased due to the creation of impervious surfaces over the soil, the provision of drywells for increased runoff disposal will compensate for localized reduction in absorption. The drainage plan will be submitted to the Spokane County Engineer's office for approval. d. Unvoidable Adverse Impacts Provided that the storm water disposal system is designed to Spokane County Standards, no adverse impacts are anticipated from storm water runoff. 3.3 Floods a. Existing Conditions The project is sufficiently above the Spokane River Flaw to be out of the 100 year flood plain. It is, however, at the base of Forker Road which drains approximately 1260 acres of farm and timberland. The now defunct Spokane Land and Water Company had built a canal along the north edge of the Spokane Valley in the vicinity of this project. The canal flowed westward along the valley edge until it reached a natural drainage way which joined the Spokane River at Plantes Ferry Park on Upriver Drive. In its present state of repair, the canal is inadequate to handle peak spring runoff and some washing occurs across Forker Road below the Miller house. It is apparent that brush, debris, inadequate driveway culverts and sagging embankments have considerably lowered the carrying capacity of the canal. In one particular case, between McDonald Road, extended, and Forker/Evergreen Road, extended, an outright breach has occurred with considerable erosion evident. Although the canal was not originally built for that purpose, it is very probable that Spokane County has, by long term usage, proscriptive water rights to use the canal for drainage. The only other condition which would cause occasional ponding would be a quick thaw with frozen ground conditions. All of Spokane County is subject to this phenomenon from time to time: 21 b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The proposal itself would not increase the hazard of flooding in the area or downstream. If uncorrected, the existing drainage problem on Forker Road could subject the homeowners using Forker Road to the nuisance of driving through an inch or two of water for a few days each spring. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts Installation of drywells, curbs and gutters and appropriate street design will provide adequate stormmwater management on site. The project is situated on an exceptionally good soil for absorption disposal of runoff water. Drywells penetrate the frost layer and permit disposal of runoff during frozen ground conditions. For off -site pcnding hazard, proscriptive water right for drainage would permit the county to restore and maintain the canal for runoff management from Forker Road Draw. Further, if the cross - section and slope of the canal prove to be inadequate for peak runoff flows, there are appropriate storm water detention /retention sites available above the intersection of Forker Road and Progress Road. This would best be handled by a Spokane County Stormwater Management Plan for that drainage basin. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts None 3.4 Surface Water Quantity N/A 3.5 Surface Water Quality N/A 3.6 Ground Water Movement a. Existing Conditions The project site is located over the Spokane Valley - Rathdrum Prairie aquifer, except perhaps the northerly few hundred feet. The ground water .movement of the aquifer is generally from east to west. The direction of flaw and the boundaries of the aquifer are shown on the Aquifer Location and Seismic Profile Map on page 23. The project is located near the margin of the aquifer where the depth of the aquifer is thinner than the main baly to the south. The transmissivity, or the ability of water to flow at a certain point, is a function of the depth or thicknes of the aquifer to that point. This would result in generally low transmissivity of the aquifer along the margins of the aquifer than the main body to the south. Lower transmissivity of the aquifer in the vicinity of the project site would result in lower flow rate per unit width. 22 ME W W W — ME M O EM EM 1 w 1. 'Five Mile Prairie SPOKANE •%111 III( I f1.INl I KIM. e111A ♦1 ill. 1111.I.n Nnt•110. WASHINGTON Moran Prairie HIllyard Profile Newman Lake Elevation in 4se1 above 2000 mean sea level Liberty Lake 180 160 140 120 100 800 0 0 0 Distance infrom Indicated reference o IDAHO CO 0 O a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 CHICO• 0 Hayden Lake COEUR D' ALENE STATE LINE SEISMIC PROFILE Coeur d'Alene Lake N O O 0 CI o O o o o o 0 0 0 0 01 O O 0 HILLYARD TROUGH SEISMIC PROFILE 012 N I A O 12 al ii .IM \ . AN FORMAT\N��e'♦1 1 ..W ^ GLACIAL a 1.1111111 0_ ACIAL tau! FLUVIAL DEPOSITS �G/eeW�> GRANITE ROCK O O 0 N O O 0 0 O O 0 01 CO 0 0 0 AQUIFER LOCATION AND SEISMIC PROFILE 'SOURCE: SPOKANE CITY PLAN COMMISSION Calculated ground water velocities are relatively high for a ground water system. Calculations vary from 90.5 feet per day at State Line to 41.1 feet per day at the Hillyard Trough, both calculated by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1976. A different set of estimated aquifer characteristics led to calculated velocities of 54 feet per day at State Lire and 47 feet per day at the Hillyard Trough. The transmissivity assumed for the second calculated flow is shoran on the Aquifer Transmissivity Distribution Map, page 25. The second calculations were calculated by the U.S.G.S., 1978. The calculated transmissivity of the aquifer in the vicinity of the project could be approximately 2.5 x 10.6 feet per day. The velocity of flaw could be assumed to be in the neighborhood of 50 feet per day under the project site. These values are relatively high and indicate a very dynamic system rather than a stable pool of water. The water level contour for the site is approximately elevation'1,940; however, the level is variable. During a normal year, the water table fluctuates on the order of 5 to 10 feet. Given an elevation of 2,030 to 2,050 on the project site, the water table could be on the order of 90 to 110 feet below the surface elevation. This is substantiated by the well records of the Trentwrood Irrigation well on the northeast corner of Progress and Wellesley, across the street from the proposed project. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The project is located near the margin of the aquifer where the transmissivity and flow of the aquifer are lower than in the main body to the south. While it is not anticipated that the proposed project will have any perceptible impact on the hydrology of the aquifer, the existing hydrology of the aquifer will have a bearing on potential impact on ground water quality degradation from project related effluents. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts None d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts None 3.7 Ground Water Quantity a. Existing Conditions The Spokane Valley - Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer flows under the site except, perhaps, the northly few hundred feet. The total estimated flaw under the project site is on the order of 80 cubic feet oer second (cfs ;2.33 cubic meters /secorrjl . This estimate is based on a rnrnber of assumptions in projecting values from the "208" Study and previous studies, and could he as much as an order of magnitude higher or laver. There is an existing 24 bl. IIII. I,I I \�. AQUIFER BOUNDARY °s %AQUIFER BOUNDARY SPRAGUE AVE. WELLESLEY INTERSTATE 90 AQUIFER TRANSMISSIVITY DISTRIBUTION SOURCE : U.S.G. S. 2.5X10 6 - o at 0.2 0.4 0.6 a8 1 2 well at the corner of Progress Road and Wellesley Avenue which was drilled 98 feet to the aquifer. It is a high volume well operated by Trentwood Irrigation District which indicates penetration of the aquifer. Projecting from figure 3 in the "208" Interim Water Quality Monitoring Report, Febru- ary, 1978, there is a flea of about 860 cubic Eeet per second ;25m3 /sec.1 in a cross section near Trentwood for the entire aquifer. With existing data, it is extremely hard to predict flocs at any given point and the hydrology of the aquifer is currently being more closely looked at by the "208" Study. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The maximum summertime demand for water from the aquifer as supplied by Trentiood Irrigation District would be 2,500 gallons per day per homesite or about 665,000 gallons per day for the project of peak daily demand. This translates to 1.03 cubic feet per second (.03m3 /second) or about 1 /10 of 1 percent of the available estimated flow at that section. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts Energy and resource conservation programs have been stressing water fixtures and appliances which conserve water such as special shower nozzles, laa volume flushing toilets, and water efficient dish and clothes washers. Other measures are automatic lawn watering systems which irrigate at night, drip irrigation systems for hedges, gardens, trees and shrubs and natural law- irrigation landscaping installations. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There will be a long term commitment of water from the Spokane Aquifer to service the homes, lawns, and gardens of the project. The aquifer is a relatively high volume, fast moving aquifer with reliable recharge. The new water demand could not cause any significant lowering of the local water table: 3.8 Ground Water Quality a. Existing Conditions Ground water quality of the Spokane Valley- Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer has been studied by the Spokane County's "208" Project. Sampling of ground water and surface water at selected locations throughout the aquifer on a variety of parameters has been completed. The synthesis of the raw data is underway, and in the near Future, an interpretation of this data will be available. Although no direct sampling of ground water on the project site has taken place, several "208" Study wells are located in the immediate vicinity. These well locations and one surface water sample site are shown on the Water Sampling Locations Map, nage 27 . The Trentwood Mayhew and Trentwood Progress wells were sampled, but not as often as some of the other wells. The following table shows the arithmetic mean of "208" Study samples of selected parameters of these three wells and the surface water sample location called Spokane River at Pines. 26 1 1 1 1 _1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 St f!: S mut is a a ■rr Mt Si i — a -a ma S 'NI \NIIYAI It It YNIIINIIYINI. • UNSI Y111 IYINIIIYI��Y�I II�N , DEPTH SELECTIVE SAMPLING WELL PRIVATE OR PURVEYOR WELL SURFACE SAMPLING POINT SOURCE: U.S.G.S. AQUIFER BOUNDARY O P /NES SPRAGUE genim S � E PROGRESS _ — _•_ WELLESLEY SULL /VAN WATER SAMPLING LOCATIOI"JS POKANE R /VER AQUIFER BOUNDARY ARITHMETIC MEAN OF "208" STUDY WFiiG Spokane River at Parameter Trentwood Mayhew Trentwood Progress Kaiser Eastqate Pines Temp. degree C 10.0 11.4 9.7 7.6 Conductivity m /mhos /cm 417.5 335.4 396.8 74.3 PH 6.8 6.9 6.7 6.7 Chloride mg/I. 2.9 2.3 21.0 • .9 Hardness mq/L 215.0 184.0 180.7 ' 61.6 Nitrate -N No3 mq/L 4.2 2.6 2.6 .4 Fecal Coliform 0 0 0 No. of Samples 2 5 10 6 The closest downstream (aquifers death selective "208" Study well would be the 208 Irvin Well. ;See Water Samplings locations Map, page 27.1 Samples were taken at varying depths in the aquifer. The following table shags the arithmetic mean by depth for the "209" Irvin Well for the first Year of saapling. 28 1 �1 1 1 1 1 1 �1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ti 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 y 1 " 208" IRVIN WELL ARPIHMETIC MEAN BY DEPTH DEPTH 0 -2* -3* -6 -10* -12 -22 -25* . -30* =48* -49* -50 Temp. Deg. C. 10.5 10.5 10.0 10.0 11.0' 10.0 10.0 10.8 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Conduct. m /mhos/ cm 282.0 300.0 263.0 272.0.298.0 272.5 276.3 300.0 300.0 290.0 300.0 273.5 PH 6.9 6.7 6.5 6.7 6.9 6.8 6.7 6.9 6.7 6.7 6.8 6.7 Chloride mg/L 2.2 1.1 2.1 2.2 1.3 1.8 1.7 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.7 Hardness mg/L 152.0 140.0 153.0 146.0 176.0 147.8 148.8 170.0 148.0 140.0 150.0 145.0 Nitrate No3 mg/L 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 Fecal Coliform 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * Only one sample taken at that depth. Several other parameters have been analyzed by several different laboratories (208, W.S.U., I.H.W., D.S.H.S., E.P.A., U.S.G.S.4. Chemical analysis of various metals, Phenols, color, total coliform and dissolved solids, floride and turbidity, to name a few, have been performed. The U. S. Geological Survey Open -File Report 77-829 Plate No. 10 indicates that iron color, total dissolved solids, phenols and nitrate have at least once exceeded chemical standards set by the E.P.A. for those particular elements. For location of these wells, see Water Quality, page 30. Several wells receiving water from the Spokane Valley - Rathrum Prairie aquifer have exceeded chemical standards periodically, although these samples comprised less than one -half of 1 percent of those samples analyzed for values exceeding established maximum contaminant levels for those constituents. About 1.4 percent of the analyses for constituents considered detrimental to the aesthetic quality of water showed values exceeding the established secondary levels. Data from the on-going "208" Study on quality of the aquifer will be interpreted shortly to give more comparative information and more detail. 29 sss ssss ssss s s% m u11 CITY LIMITS ssssss I.N1 ANO•At 1111. 11.1.1101111M. •10•••111.1111111.1 'Fe — Iron flI 111 CLR — Color a a a WATER QUALITY TDS Total dissolved solids NO Nitrate PN— Phenols SOURCE: U.S.G.S. SPOKANE RIVER BROADWAY NO3 CLR 1 SANSON TDS PN 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0,6 0.8 1 ctITE WELLESLEY TRENT lee la ni n a S a la S S hult air tol ,S> at as S Si b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action Ground water quality may be compacted from the following sources: (11 waste water collection treatment and disposal facilities, (21 stormaater drainage system, and (31 use of dhemicals. Sewage waste water generated by the proposed project will, at least for the short term, be handler] by individual septic tanks and drainfields. Soils on the site have been varified and an individual septic tank with drainfield for each lot has been approved by the Spokane County Health District. It is estimated that the residents of the proposed project will generate approximately 80,000 gallons of waste water per day, which would be disposed of by the drainfields and ultimately percolated into the soil. The waste water would then be processed by natural -soils systems. The natural -soil system of the project site has been found to be acceptable for the - development of septic -tank systems, with no limitations because of slope. Soils systems are generally very effective in removing metal contaminants such as zinc, copper, 'nickel, cadmium and lead. - --In_. addition, the natural filtration process of soils removes bacteria and viruses The primary nutrients, such as phosphorous and nitrogen, are not completely removed from waste water by septic -tank drainfield systems - . Nitrogen removal and phosphate removal are functions of physical /chemical properties, uptake by cover crops, and carefully controlled drainfield - applications which optimize nutrient removal. Stormwater drainage, as discussed in other parts of this EIS, will- be disposed of on site through the use of catch basins and'drywells. No provisions are made for surface water drainage treatment. It can be expected that the storm water runoff will contain minor amounts of some ground water pollutants, such as petroleum based hydrocarbons, suspended sails and inorganic salts. A preponderance of these contaminates are subject to substantial removal as the stormwater percolates through the soil columns above the ground water. The soil column could be approximately 80 to 110 feet thick on the site. Soil systems generally-- do not retain anions including sulfate, chloride, nitrate and bicarbonate. These dissolved inorganic matter will .rove through soils and possibly increase potential for ground water contamination. The use of chemicals most likely will occur on the project site in the form of fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides for domestic and lawn and garden care. The quantities used in residential areas, should not be used intensively enough to pose a threat to ground water quality. To try to quantify the impacts of this development on the aquifer quality would be extremely difficult, if not futile. The "208" Water Quality Management Program, being conducted by the Spokane County in cooperation with the U.S.G.S., U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and the State Department of Ecology, has not to date provided any definite conclusions regarding recharge of the aquifer drainfield, storm water 31 effluent, or chemical use over the aquifer. It is anticipated that, in the near future, the "208" will have a Cause and Effect report dealing with the effect of urbanization on the aquifer. c. Measures to Mitigate the Adverse Impacts The installation of dryline sewers would give the proposed project the alternative of connecting to a sewer system at a later date, if a sewering plan for the Spokane Valley was adopted; or development of an on -site treatment facility, if it is more adventageous. The ground water impact could also be mitigated by reducing the density of the project, thereby reducing the volume of surface and waste water that must be disposed of in subsurface systems. This would potentially reduce the volume of 'contaminates that must be controlled, treated and /or disposed of on the surface above the aquifer. Lowering the density of the project, however, may work against the ultimate solution to the problem of ground water contamination. At a later density, alternative waste water systems per unit costs increase and become economically unfeasible.. - A number of measures are available to mitigate the impacts of oonhaminants carried in surface water runoff or ground water quality. The acceptability and effectiveness of these measures have not been demonstrated because of their lack of wide spread use. Sediment basins can be used to settle out a large portion of the suspended soils in surface runoff. Sediment basins are not effective in controlling soluble inorganic salts. Oil and grease separators can be used to remove petroleum products from surface runoff. These separators have been only moderately effective and should be limited in use to areas where likelihood of grease or fuel -oil spill is probable. d. Unvoidable Adverse Impacts The possibility that effluent generated by the proposal will reach the ground water of the Spokane Valley - Rathdrum Prairie aquifer cannot be ruled out. The extent or magnitude of this contamination is unknown at this time, and is the subject of several on -going studies. 3.9 Public Water Supplies . a. Existing Environmental Conditions The proposal lies within the service area of Trentwood Irrigation District. There is a high volume well immediately adjacent to the proposed plat at Wellesley and Progress Road Water quality for that well is excellent. 32 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 r _+ -- s s n , a =i arJ —, a a a W W WATER SERVICE LOCATIONS SOURCE: TRENTWOOD WATER DISTRICT. O 100 300 500 FEET 50 200 400 �, b. Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The proposal could create a maximum summertime daily demand of 2,000 gallons per lot or 532,000 gallons per day. Whether or not additional pumping would be required is not yet known, but the plat will be supplied with mains and hydrants adequate for domestic and fire protection purposes. All improvements within the plat will conform to standards required of Washington State Public Water Systems. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts None d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts None 4. Flora 4.1 Numbers or Diversity of Species a. Existing Conditions The site is 91 acres of cleared land which is cultivated with agricultural crops that include wheat, barley or hay. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action Development of the site as proposed will result in the permanent disruption of the current agricultural use of the site. The existing crops will be replaced with residential lawns, shrubs, trees, flowers and vegetables. The nature and extent of the landscaping will be up to the new property owners in the development. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts The removal of agricultural crops from the site will, in part, be compensated for by the landscaping that will be introduced with the proposed development. The less of agricultural production cannot be completely mitigated except by the introduction of similar cropland elsewhere. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The permanent removal of agricultural crops from the site. 34 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 4.2 Unique Species a. Existing Conditions There are not known to be any unique or rare species of flora on the site at present. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action None c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts None d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts None 4.3 Barriers and /or Corridors N/A 4.4 Agricultural Crops a. Existing Conditions The site consists of 91 acres of cultivated farmland with crops which include wheat, barley or hay. This farmland has been designated as prime farmland according to the Soil Conservation Service. The prime agricultural soils are of the Garrison Series with 0 to 5 percent slopes. (See page 101. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The proposed residential development will convert 91 acres of cropland into a single family residential subdivision. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts Back -yard gardens can produce a fair amount of produce. Such gardens will, however, only minimize the potential long -range reduction of food crops on the Sumnerfield land. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The proposed development will result in a small local loss in production potential for hay and grain crops. 35 5. Fauna 5.1 Nimbers or Diversity of Species a. Existing Conditions The wildlife population on the site can be categorized into resident and migratory species. Resident species include field mice, :roles, white - tailed jack rabbits, ground squirrels, big brown bats, American robins, starlings, house sparrows, red - tailed hawks, California valley quail, ring - necked pheasant, and ruffled grouse. Migratory species that may occasionally be found on site include the western white -tail deer, coyote, bobcat, feral dogs, ground squirrels, striped skunks, yellow- bellied marmots, white - tailed jack rabbits, snowshoe hare, hawks, quail, grouse, doves and pheasants. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The construction of the development will result in the permanent disruption of habitat for the larger animals. The smaller animals may be forced to relocate from the site but should remain in the area. The bird populations on -site will be dependent upon several factors. The reduction of rodents and insects will affect birds of prey which utilize these sources of food, such as owls and hawks. The project may encourage species such as song birds, sparrows, and the robin, which may outstrip other species of birds for food supply, habitat and nesting sites. The project will also result in the introduction of a number of household pets. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts The retention of as much natural vegetation as possible on the property lying northeast of the site and on the one -acre tracts will preserve habitat for some of the smaller animals and birds. Landscaping and plantings of trees and shrubs will encourage certain species of fauna to co -exist with man. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The project will resultin a decrease in the number and /or diversity of wildlife that inhabit the area. 36 1 1 1 1 1 1: 1 1 1 1 1. 11 11 11 11 11 1 5.2 Unique Species a. Existing Conditions Consultaticn with the Washington State Department of Game revealed no known unique, rare, or endangered species currently using the site. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action None c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts None d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts None 5.3 Barriers and /or Corridors N/A 5.4 Fish or Wildlife Habitat N/A 6. Noise a. Existing Conditions Noise in any given area is the product of two types of sources: (11 am- bient raise which is associated with the overall effect of Long -term noise - producing activities, .and ;2b identifiable noise produced by specific sources. The primary noise generated in the vicinity of the site is identifiable noise produced by vehicular traffic along Wellesley Avenue, Progress Road and Forker Road and by the various activities associated with Trentwood Elementary and East Valley Junior High Schools. The major source of noise is from vehicular traffic. Since the property in question is vacant, no significant noise is presently generated from the site. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The noise impacts of the project will he related to construction, vehicular traffic, general human activity, and minor mechanical noise. During the construction of the project, noise will be generated by equipment used for land development, road construction, and the building of structures. Equipment used for the land development will be used to build roads, for excavation, and for the digging of trenches for water, septic tanks or sewerlines, and utility lines. • 37 It should be noted that temporary sounds resulting from construction activities are exempt from the State of Washington noise standards. Increased vehicular traffic during the operational phase of the project will cause a substantial noise level increase on the site. It should be pointed out, however, that noise generated by *.rotor vehicles operating on public right -of -ways which conforms to the required Washington State noise emission levels of WAC- 173 -52 are deemed legal. It is not expected that any of the residences within Sumnerfield East will be exposed to traffic- induced noise exceeding the Washington State standards of 65 dBA for a prolonged period of time. The increase in human activity, mechanical noise, and vehicular traffic will combine to create noise levels exceeding that currently existing, but the noise impact should not be significant. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts The increase in noise levels from the construction operations will be mitigated in several ways which include: the distance of construction activities from existing residences; the temporary nature of the activities; the limitation of construction activities to normal (7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.l corking hours; and the noise buffering provided by the insulated walls of dwellings. Increased vehicular traffic related noise levels can be mitigated by the use of properly operating mufflers and quieting devices, and shutting off of idling equipment. As previously mentioned, W C- 173 -62 establishes maximum noise levels for motor vehicles. The traffic - generated noise will be most noticeable during normal business hours and should peak at 7:30 to 9:00 a.m. and from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. These time factors will tend to restrict noise intrusions to corking hours, thus limiting the duration of noise - generation periods. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Increased noise levels generated during the construction phase of the project and additional increases from vehicular traffic during the operational phase will create unavoidable impacts, but will not exceed State and Federal standards. 38 7. Light and Glare a. Existing Conditions There are no sources of light or glare on the site. Along the periphery of the site are street lights, and security lighting at Trentwocd Elementary and East Valley Junior High Schools. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The project will require artificial light, and generated by the following: street lighting to increase night visibility and to reduce driving hazards; interior and exterior lighting for each single - family residence. Automobiles and truck lights during nighttime driving will will create additional light and glare. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts The use of low intensity street lighting, which is required to meet the approval of the Spokane County Engineers, will mitigate some of 'the impact. Careful planning along with architectural coordination and generous use of landscaping (i.e., trees and shrubs will help to reduce the impacts of light and glare. Reduction of nuisance glare at "T" intersections by adjustment of lot lines can reduce glare from headlights. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The project will result in increases in light and glare on the project site. 8. Land Use a. Existing Conditions The proposed project site lies within Spokane County and its planning and zoning jurisdiction. The site is presently cultivated with crops that include wheat, barley or hay. The existing land uses in the vicinity of the proposed development are varied, as shown on the Land Use Map on page 40. The land uses north of the site include: the Bonneville Power Administration Power Lines, scattered single- family residences and parcels along the hillside presently under cultivation. The land uses south of the site include: Trentwood Elementary School, single- family residences within King Subdivision ;average lot size 10,000 square feet' and the Valley Baptist Church. Lying southeast of the site 39 3S ®1 .. nra nn imen� nrn,ia „ uvn u. u,n■ j VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT VACANT EAST VALLEY JR. HIGH VACANT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISON TRUCK FARM PASTURE SOURCE; SPOKANE COUNTY PLAN COMMISSION ala CULTIVATED ALFALFA CROPS VACANT VACANT IIIIINIIIWI ® Ind O O E a® M r M OM I MN 'a OM NM M •a MI are single - family residences and to the southwest are single - family residences and vacant property. The'land uses east of the site include: East Valley Junior High, (East Valley High School is located just east of Sullivan Road); scattered single family residences; Trentwood Irrigation District pump and pump house; water tank and scattered parcels presently under cultivation. The land uses west of the site include: parcels presently used for truck farming and for pasture; single - family residences within Swan Acres Subdivision, Pare Addition, Curry One Addition and Alexandar Subdivision, :average lot sizes range from 10,000 sq. feet to 17,000 sq. feeti; and scattered suburban residences. The site currently has the agricultural zone classification (An adopted April 24, 1942, as shown on the Zoning Map on page 42. The agricultural zone is a land use classification designating an area suitable for farming and agricultural pursuits, including cultivation of land, fruit raising, truck farming, livestock production, dairying, poultry raising, and forestry. Commercial and industrial activities unrelated to agriculture are prohibited. The properties lying north and east of the site have the agricultural zone classification (Al and the properties to the south and west have the agricultural (Ai, agricultural suburban (ASI , and the single - family residential (R -11 zone classifications. The "Generalized Comprehensive Plan, Spokane Metropolitan Area" (last revised and approved on October 22, 19684 designates the project site for residential neighborhood use. The site was originally subdivided in the early 1900's as Bonnie Lea Acre Tracts, but was vacated by the Spokane County Board of Commissioners of Spokane on December 1, 1914. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The proposed project is a planned residential development of approximately 91 acres consisting of 268 lots with a gross density of 2.9 lots per gross acre. Lot sizes will vary a little, but a typical lot will have 80 feet of public road frontage and a total of 10,000 sq. feet of area. In addition, there will be three one -acre suburban tracts fronting on Forker Road The project will result in a change in land use of the site from vacant and cultivated agricultural land into a single - family residential development. The density of the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding residential uses as well as approved subdivisions within the area. 41 SPEC IM1 M.I,.,, I I Jry „X . 4IIIM1 \IX I .�� X XkIII..” WEL L ESL EY AVE. 4 0 • afi 0 Cr Z ®1!SIPJG MAP AGRICULTURAL ZONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE RESTRICTED RESIDENTIAL ZONE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COMMERCIAL ZONE AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN ZONE MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN ZONE RESIDENTIAL MOBIL HOME ZONE MANUFACTURING ZONE O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,1 1 1 1 The 25 acre parcel located north of the site and used for BPA power lines and required easements, may also be used as a site for a combination sewage treatment plant and on space area, if such a sewage treatment facility is required by the Spokane County Health District. This property has not been included as part of the Sunmerfield East project, but is within the sponsor's ownership. BPA power line easement restricts the uses permitted on this 25 acre parcel. A copy of the Bonneville Power Administration Power Line Easements can be found on page 83, Appendix "C ". c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts Potential adverse land use impacts will be mitigated by the establishment of an orderly pattern of development and project phasing. In addition, an Architectural Control Committee may be used by the project sponsor and together with restrictive covenants, the two will help to maintain a higher degree of quality and integrity throughout the project. The impact of growth in the area should not be considered a negative impact unless growth is permitted to proceed in a random, undirected fashion. Development patterns can be controlled by the application of controls available in planning, zoning, and subdivision regulations. In addition, the County Planning Staff and Planning Commission review and approval process provide guidance for an orderly pattern of development. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Those who desire to maintain the site in its present rural state may view the proposed land use as an unavoidable adverse impact. 9. Natural Resources 9.1 Rate of Use a. Existing Conditions The site is currently used in the production and cultivation of wheat, barley or hay. The Prime Agricultural are the only apparent natural re- sources of significance on the site at the present time. b. The Probable Lnpact of the Proposed Action The permanent disruption of the current agricultural use of the site will be the most significant impact on existing natural resources. During the construction phase of the project, natural resources will be consumed, including the energy resources directly and indirectly used by construction activities and the natural resources utilized as building materials. Natural resources will continue to be consumed after construction and include energy in the form of fossil fuels for transportation, as well as electricity for heating. 43 C. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts The consumption of natural resources during the construction and occupancy phases of the project will be kept to a minimum through the use of a variety of energy and other conservation techniques which are becoming widely accepted and practiced by builders and the general public. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The proposed project will consume natural resources during the construction and occupancy phases. 9.2 Nonrenewable Resources. N/A 10. Risk of Explosion or Hazardous Emissions N /A, 44 Elements of the Human Environment 1. Population a. Existing Conditions The site is located in the Spokane Valley, the major growth area of the Spokane Metrolpolitan Area. Since 1950, growth in the Spokane Valley has significantly outpaced growth in the rest of the county, as shown in the table below. POPULATION ,RDWrH IN THE SPOKANE AREA 1950 1960 1970 1976 Total County 221,561 278,333 287,487 330,933 % increase 34 25 3 • 15 Metropolitan Area 200,900 254,521 266,340 295,000 % increase 38 26 4 11 Spokane County 161,721 181,608 170,516 174,500 % increase 32 12 -6 2 East Area 28,383 47,373 57,896 75,015 % increase 76 66 22.2 30 Annual Average Increase East Area 7.6 6.6 2.2 5.0 Source: The Spokane Area Development Council The growth in the county's east area over the last three decades appears to have been due in part to the influx of people in the Pacific Northwest and partly due to this area's suburbanization. This growth in the Spokane Valley is expected to continue at a fairly rapid rate in the years ahead. The Census of Population and Housing Data identifies the site as being, located within Census Tract 114. The population growth within Census Tract 114 has been extremely rapid in the past few years. From 1971 to 1976, the tract's population increased from 3,020 to 3,831 (21 percent. Population projections for Spokane County have been prepared by the Spokane County Planning Department and the Spokane Area Development Council for the period from 1930 to the year 2000 in five -year increments. High, medium, and low population estimates have been provided in both forecasts, as shown in the following table. Note that the estimated population of the County in 1976 exceeded even the high population estimates for the year 1930 due to the rapid growth during the past few years. 45 POPULATION PROJECTIONS FOR SPOKANE COUNTY Projection by 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2020 Spokane County Planning Dept. (19741 High 323,000 342,000 366,000 395,000 408,000 % increase 6.8 5.9 7.0 5.5 5.7 Medium 318,000 334,000 352,000 369,000 386,000 % increase 6.3 5.0 5.4 4.8 4.5 Low 313,000 326,000 338,000 352,000 364,000 % increase 5.9 4.1 3.7 4.1 3.4 Spokane Area Development Council (19751 High 322,200 350,700 378,500 405,200 433,200 530,100 % increase 8.1 8.8 7.9 7.3 6.6 24.4 Medium 309,800 329,900 350,700 370,400 391,000 470,800 % increase 3.9 6.5 6.3 5.6 5.6 20.4 Low 296,500 301,800 308,500 315,200 321,300 345,900 % increase -0.5 1.8 2.2 2.2 1.9 7.7 Source: Spokane County Planning Department, Spokane Area Development Council b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The proposed project contemplates 268 residences which will increase the area's population base. To get from this number to an estimate of resident population, it is necessary to estimate the average household size. Using the factors from Evaluating Economic Impact, published by the California Office of Planning and Research, 1977, which suggests the use of 3.5 persons per single - family dwelling, Sumnerfield East will result in a resident population projection of 938 people when fully developed. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts The increased population impact of this project can be mitigated by careful planning and the development and implementation of land use policies and regulations. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Even with the development and implementation of land use policies and regulations, a population increase in this area will be considered by some to'be an unavoidable and adverse impact. 46 2. Economics a. Existing Conditions According to the Spokane County Assessor's tax records, the property has a 1977 assessed value of $55,960.00, and the 1977 real estate taxes are listed as $1,407.93 at a millage rate of $23.10 per thousand. A breakdown of the property tax by recipient follows: Recipient Millage Rate State 4.821 County 1.963 County Road Fund 2.167 County Library Fund .487 School District No. 361 11.034 Fire District No. 1 2.634 'DOTAL 23.10 b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The construction phase of the project will require expenditures for payrolls and for the purchase of materials; supplies, and services. The total projected direct expenditures for labor and materials for the development are estimated at approximately $15,946,000.00. Included in this projection are the costs of engineering design and environmental studies, structures, streets, lot improvements, and utilities. A variety of accessory costs are not included: selling costs, sales taxes, real estate excise taxes, land costs, loan fees, interest, etc. A secondary economic impact would be the expenditures For materials, supplies, and services, due to the increases in payrolls for employees of the firms producing the goods and services. It is projected that when the development is completed, the assessed taxable value of the land and structures for the 91 acres of Sumnierfield East will have increased to $16,750,000.00 !1978 dollarsb. (The assumptions used to generate this estimate have been based on an average combination lot -house market value of $62,500.001. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts None d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts None 47 3. Housing a. Existing Conditions As mentioned in the population review, the Spokane Valley is an area of significant growth. The north, south and east portions of the Valley are currently experiencing rapid growth in the form of housing starts which are a result of new subdivision development. The site is located within Census Tract 114. The 1970 Census of Population and Housing Data indicates that to be a total of 1,042. The 1976 data indicates a total of 1,235 for Census Tract 114, a 15 percent increase over the 1970 total. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The suburban housing market in the Spokane area has been strong for the past three years and it is expected to continue strong in the foreseeable future. The National Association of Home Builders predicts that 2,440 new homes will be constructed in Spokane County, 30 percent below their 1977 production figure of 3,452 new homes. Sumnerfield East has been proposed in response to the existing and the anticipated demands, and will add 268 single - family dwellings to the local market. The selling price for the lots within the proposed development will range in price from $8,000 to $10,000 which, in turn, will generate housing which will range in cost from $40,000 to $85,000. Taking inflation into account, the proposed project appears to be consistent with the existing housing in the area, in terms of the type and cost. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts Project phasing of approximately 44 new residential units per year will tend to ease the impact of Sumnerfield East on the area's housing market. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts None 48 4. Transportation /Circulation 4.1 Vehicular Transportation Generated a. Existing Conditions Trent Avenue, Pines Road, and Sullivan Road are the major arterials servicing the area. Wellesley Avenue is also considered a secondary arterial. The average daily traffic counts are shown on page 50. There is no vehicular traffic generated by the site at present. The surrounding area also generates modest volumes of traffic to adjacent hcmesites and the three schools nearby. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The expected maximum traffic volume of a 268 lot subdivision can be calculated using an average of 8 trips per day per household. This would create about 2,144 one -way vehicle trips per day. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts The development of transit to city and employment centers would mitigate additional generated traffic, but generally these systems have been poorly supported. Carpooling could also have a limited effect. Pedestrian access to local schools, which are all within walking distance, will also reduce trip requirements for school - related activities. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Most of the above mitigating measures have never proven to be very effective. Therefore, the increased impacts due to traffic may be considered unavoidable. 4.2 Parking Facilities N/A 4.3 Transportation Systems a. Existing Conditions The existing transportation systems are limited to privately owned vehicles, since no buses or railways service the project area. The closest bus service is a twice daily route to the Industrial Park town Trent Avenue. The road networks in the area provide excellent_ access for individuals to and from their homes. 49 A.D.T. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 2840 1379 919 3566 2394 1360 2089 2442 1977 Counts fl ff e ..n Y.I u n I ••mI 1 NIN1. N •...".1111 IIiINI IIYNIY.IIIIN SOURCE: SPOKANE COUNTY PLAN COMMISSION 5 4- SPOKANE RIVER 3 SIT 4 WEL LESL ET — 10 11 — t TRENT �14 12 `-13 3670 2120 4420 10300 11580 8300 A.D T. 9. 10. I1. 12. 13. 14. 1978 Counts AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT SPOKANE • RIVER ® NIS ® MR S ® N NO ON MI MB MI MI =I MI NM IS r b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The proposal could add several hundred trips per day to Wellesley Avenue, Sullivan Road, Pines Road, Trent, I -90, etc. Present shopping centers oUld be primarily University City and Downtown Spokane. There are, however, two new shopping centers being proposed. One would be at Broadway Avenue and Sullivan Road and the other would be at I -90 and Liberty Lake Drive. Neither proposal has been approved by the County Commissioners to date, but either one would certainly change shopping destinations for area residents. The quality of primary and secondary roads to service the plat is excellent, and all roads have ample capacity for the expected influx. c. Measures to Mitigate the Proposed Action Access to the elementary school has been provided which will cut school related vehicle trips. Efforts are being continued to improve the Spokane Transit System and increase ridership. Whether or not bus service will be extended to this area is a matter of economics and public acceptance. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There will, even with the best street design, be increased accident potential because of the increased traffic levels. 4.4 Movement /Circulation of People or Cnods a. Existing Conditions Present movement of goods and people is governed by the road network described in 3.3 of this document. b. Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The movement and circulation patterns should remain the same, but would have a moderate increase in activity. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts See 3.3 of this document. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts See 3.3 of this document. 4.5 Waterborne, Rail and Air Traffic N/A 51 4.6 Traffic Hazards a. Existing Conditions There are no traffic hazards on site at present since it is undeveloped. Servicing arterials are well signed, lighted or channelized for traffic control. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action On site, the generation of vehicular traffic from residences could create traffic hazards. Off site, increased traffic would also increase traffic hazards. c. Measures to Mitigate the Adverse Impacts Good design aids in reducing traffic hazards. In this case, effort has been made on street layouts to discourage high -speed through traffic in residential areas. Gentle curves and cul-de -sacs are emphasized for this reason. It is recommended that residential streets not be excessively wide for the same reason. "Stop" and "Yield" signs should be provided where appropriate. The provision for sidewalks could mitigate potential pedes- trian and vehicular traffic hazards. Four separate accesses have been provided whidl limit access on arterials. Lots along Wellesley and Progress Road have rear yards facing those roads which limit access to the two streets provided. Access to the elementary school has been provided in three locations permitting access by pedestrian grade school children without having to walk along Wellesley Avenue or Progress Road. If traffic levels become sufficiently high at Evergreen Road and Trent Avenue in the future, some channelizaticn may be required for safer turning and crossing. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Increased exposure to traffic accidents because of increased volume of traffic. 5. Public Services 5.1 Fire a. Existing Conditions The proposal is located within Fire District No. 1 of Spokane County. The nearest fire station is located on the corner of Broadway and Sullivan Roads approximately 2 3/4 miles south of the proposal. Response time is estimated to be approximately 3 1/2 to 4 minutes. The station is manned by a full -time staff and equipped with a 1,250 g.p.m. pumper and a 1,000 g.p.m. reserve pumper. 52 b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action Fire District No. 1 will ultimately be resnonsible for the fire protec- tion of approximately 258 new residential units. It is not anticipated that additional staff or equipment will be needed as a result of the project. The cumulative impact, however, of residential growth within the Fire District boundaries may require additional staff and equipment in the future. The proposal could not pose any unusual fire hazards and, therefore, will not require special fire - fighting equipment. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts Mitigation of fire potential on the site can be achieved in several ways which include: Use of non- combustible materials where passible; Use of smoke detection devices; Project design that will facilitate fire vehicle access, The extension of water mains and hydrants which will be subject to requirements by Fire District No. 1; Spokane Building and Fire Codes as they pertain to life and fire safety; Lot sizes and building setbacks will minimize possibility of conflagration. Property taxes provide a source of revenue which reduce additional costs for the extension of fire protection. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Increase in the possibility of fire on the site which will create additional service requirements in Fire District No. 1. 5.2 Police a. Existing Conditions Law enforcement services are provided by the Spokane County Sheriff's Department. The Sheriff's Department operates a substation located at 10319 Sprague Avenue, approximately five miles to the southwest corner of the site. According to Department officials, it is within a response and service area which is patrolled, although the Sheriff's staff is under manned at .75 officers per 1,000 population. 53 The Washington State Patrol provides traffic enforcement and back -up services in the area. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The proposal will result in increases in the service requirements of local law enforcement agencies. c. Measures to Mitigate the Proposed Action Use of crime prevention techniques such as lighting, structure design, and landscaping, will help reduce the need for law enforcement on the site. In addition, adequate access, logical extension of street names, where possible; and easily readable addresses will reduce response time. Law enforcement service increases required by the development would be mitigated by the addition in tax revenues to Spokane County. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The proposal will result in an increase in law enforcement services. 5.3 Schools a. Existing Conditions The proposal is located in the East Valley School District No. 361. The district has experienced a 24 percent increase in enrollment from 1970 to 1977. Presently, the Fast Valley District operates three elementary . schools, one junior high school and one high school. The East Valley District also has a newly formed committee to identify needs, and plan for facilities expansion. An interview with the East Valley School District facility planner revealed that a new elementary school is being constructed in the Otis Orchards area. This school would be ready January, 1979. A new junior high is also under construction in Otis Orchards and is scheduled to be open in September, 1979. Upon the opening of these two schools, the enrollments given in the following table will be reduced, as approximately half of the junior high students will attend the new facility at Otis Orchards and approximately 25 elementary students will attend the new elementary school in the Otis Orchards area. -The three schools impacted by the project are'all within .calking distance of the proposal. The existing enrollments and capacity are shown on the following page. 54 School Trentwood Elementary E. 14701 Wellesley East Valley Junior High N. 4920 Progress Rd. East Valley High E. 1511 Wellesley Address SCHOOLS IMPACi BY PR.QJECT Grades Enrollment Capacity K -6 600 600 7 -9 702 10 -12 682 800 900 A bond issue is currently before the voters which would provide inane for the purchase of two elementary school sites and a high school site. This bond issue was voted down in the October primary and will be submitted again in the November election. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The proposal would add additional school -age children to the East Valley School system. The maximum number of students generated by the proposal would be approximately 536. Assuming student populations would be equally distributed in age, it would mean 268 additional elementary students, 134 junior high students, and 134 high school students. It is not anticipated that additional students would have to be bussed to and from schools because of the close proximity to schools. However, increases may cause short term bussing and/or redistricting of school boundaries. The increased student population would have its greatest effect on the elementary school, which would not currently be able to handle the increase. The junior high, with the planned opening of the new junior high, would have available capacity to handle increases. The high school would also have available capacity to handle increases. Because of the rapid growth in the area, these available capacities would most likely be short lived. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts Growth in the school district can most readily be accommodated by proper planning. The newly formed committee on facilities will perform such a function. School taxes for operation and maintenance are provided by special levies and Property taxes. The proposal, upon completion, would generate more tax dollars per year to help mitigate increased student population impacts. Temporary classrooms may be moved between schools as a temporary relief measure until permanent classrooms are built. A declining birth rate will also slow the need for new classrooms. 55 Project phasing will also reduce impacts over the next six years, so planning of facilities will have greater lead time. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Increases in student copulation within the East Valley School District. These increases would require additional facilities, namely an elementary sdlool. New school facilities are generally not constructed until there is an overwhelming need. Then, temporary over crowding of classrooms occurs until the new facilities are completed. 5.4 Parks and Other Recreational Facilities a. Existing Conditions Within a two -mile radius there are eight county owned, or administrated, parks or recreation areas. The following table shows the parks within this two -mile radius, with the closest parks first. Name Sullivan Park Plantes' Ferry Park Mirabeau Recreation Area Central Valley Lion's Club Recreation Area Valley Mission Park Ness Park Millwood City Park Knox Park Type Picnic & Recreation Area Historical Site - Picnic Area Picnic Area Picnic Area Neighborhood park - Playground & Pool Community Playground Neighborhood Park - Playground Tot lot According to Planning for Parks ;revised in Spokane County, Washington, 19761, the project is located in the Velox neighborhood. The neighborhood had a 15 acre community park requirement that would be located adjacent to or in the vicinity of the proposed junior high school site; which is located just to the east of the project. In addition to the above mentioned parks, the three schools mentioned in 5.3 have recreational facilities for baseball, football, track, and open fields for various recreational activities. 56 Acreage 10.2 20.6 5.0 2.0 7.0 3.5 5.5 1.2 b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action It is expected that the proposal would cause increased usage of the above mentioned facilities. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts Because of immediate access to school playfields and a variety of parks in the vicinity, recreational needs of the site will be mitigated. Also, the addition of funds from County property taxes can aid in providing funds both for operation and maintenance of the facilities and, where warranted, acquisition of new park space. • d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts A moderate increase in .local park use and school playfield facilities, with increased maintenance costs, can be anticipated. 5.5 Maintenance a. Existing Conditions There are no existing roads on the project site. Trentwood Irrigation District maintains a 10" water line that runs across the site. Spokane County maintains adjacent roads for repairs and snow plowing. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The project 'would add about 15,000 feet (2.8 miles, of roads, water and possibly sewer trunks to the Spokane County maintenance responsibilities. The water system would be maintained by the Trentwood Irrigation District. Washington Water Power Company would be responsible for maintenance of underground paver line extension on the site. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts Tax revenues and monthly service charges are used to fund operation and maintenance of utilities and roads. d. Unavoidable Adverse Imoacts Additional maintenance costs and resources will have to be committed for utilities and transportation systems serving the development. 57 5.6 Other Governmental Services a. Existing Conditions The area is serviced by the Opportunity Branch Post Office and other services associated with this type of proposal. No mail or other governmental services are received on the project site. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The proposal will include an extension of postal services as well as other governmental services associated with the public. c. Measures to Mitigate the Adverse Impacts The use of cluster mailboxes could reduce the impact of delivery time and travel. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts None 6. Energy 6.1 Amounts Fyquired a. Existing Conditions At the present time energy consumption on the proposed project site is limited to that energy required for use of farm equipment for plowing, seeding, harvesting, fertilizing and other associated farm activities. In addition, energy is also consumed by the natural systems at work on the site. The natural systems involve energy exchange among the various ecological elements. b. The Probable Impact_ of the Proposed Action The proposed project's impact on energy during the short -term will be the use of energy for construction of the project. This would include consumption of fossil fuels by construction equipment and vehicles transporting workers and materials. In addition, there will be indirect uses of energy caused by ewer requirements for the production of the various building materials. It is estimated that the development, when completed, will consume approximately 10.9 million kilowatt hours of electricity per year. Natural gas requirements are based on heating needs of 25 percent of the project's homes, and would be estimated to consume 134,000 therms per year. The following table provides a breakdown of the use of 53 electricity and natural gas for the completed project, anticipating 25 percent natural gas and 75 percent electric heat. Home energy demands are as follows: Electrically Heated Homes . 44,000 kwh/home /year x 201 units = 8.8 million kwh /year Natural Gas Heated Homes 2,000 therms /year x 67 units Electrical Needs of Gas Heated Homes 30,800 kwh/home /year x 67 units = 134,000 therms /year 2.1 million kwh /year The Washington Water Power Company indicates that current energy sources are adequate to service the proposal. Traffic generated by the proposal could also represent a significant_ increase in the amount of fossil fuel consumed. The rate of use of motor fuel for private transportation is in a large part dependent on commuting distances to primarily work, but also shop- ping, recreational, cultural and educational facilities. The project is relatively close to job opportunities located in the Spokane Indus- trial Park, and Kaiser Trentwood. Numerous entertainment_, recreational, cultural, and educational facilities are located in the Spokane Valley area. Shopping travel could be inconvenient as no shopping centers are in the immediate area. Argonne Village and University City are located approximtely four and six miles away, respectively. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts The proposed development could employ innovative conservation measures which would result in reductions in potential energy consumption. The requirement for plan review by the developer will result in the opportunity to incorporate construction design features to obtain greater efficienties in the utilization of energy resources. The following measures are recommended. (11 Adequate insulation in roof, walls, and ceilings to reduce heat transmission. (21 Use of high performance furnaces that can recover waste heat from flue gas or those with a flue shut -off. (3) Use of heat retaining fireplaces or wood stoves. (41 Use of high - performance air - conditioning units (if absolutely necessary for climate control) with open -air cycles. ;51 Provision of storm windows and storm doors. (61 Provision of windows that can be opened and closed. (71 Use of tinted glass in windows. (81 Double glass windows. (9) Use of landscaping on the south and west sides of the buildings. ;101 Provisions for screens, shades, and curtains. (11) Well- ventilated attics. (121 Use of dark - colored roofs. (131 Use of flourescent rather than incandescent_ lights. 59 Reduction of travel time to shopping areas should occur , as the area develops and market conditions become favorable to the construction of facilities in the immediate area. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The proposal will result in increased demands for energy consumption in the area for automobiles and home energy needs. 6.2 Source Availability a. Existing Conditions Existing sources, and availability of these sources are managed primarily by the Washington Water Pacer Company. Energy availability is 100% in this general service area. Plans are underway at Washington Water Power to accommodate expected increases in demand in the area.(24+ b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The 258 new homes will require electricity and natural gas to be supplied by Washington Water Power Company. Current availability is 100% for the phased development. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts Conservation of energy as mentioned in Section II 5.1(c) should increase availability. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts None, if full conservation measures are implemented. 7. Utilities 7.1 Energy (See Section 6 above on Energy+ 7.2 Communications a. Existing Conditions Pacific Northwest Bell services the area . No utilities exist on the project site, but telephone lines exist all around the project site. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The 263 new homes will require Pacific Northwest Bell services. The line capacity is sufficient to handle the anticipated demand. 60 c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts Any adverse impacts which may result from the proposal may be mitigated by close coordination of easement location and project design. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts None. 7.3 Water ;See Section 13.9, Public Water Supplies) a. Existing Conditions The project site is currently in Trentwood Irrigation District. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The proposal creates a maximum summertime demand of up to 665,000 gallons per day for domestic and 'garden uses. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts If the demand exceeds the existing system capacity, additional sources, storage or ping could be provided to accommodate the demand. A monthly service charge pays for operation and maintenance of public water supplies. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts None. 7.4 Sewer a. Existing Conditions There is currently no sewage treatment facility available to service the project. Over the past decade, several studies have been made which directly or indirectly deal with the problem of sewage management over the Spokane Aquifer. To date, no governmental plan has been formally adopted. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The project proposes individual septic tank drainfield systems with dryline sewers. The impact of septic tank systems is discussed in Section I, 3.8. Septic tank drainfield systems are proposed as interim facilities with possible short term impacts, provided that the dryline 61 sewers are eventually utilized. Dryline sewers provide the proposed development with several central collection sewer alternatives both on and off site. An on -site treatment facility could be developed within the Bonneville Power Administration's powerline easement bordering the project site to the north (as shown on the site plant. The impact of this alternative would vary with the type of treatment facility eventually developed and may also be considered an interim facility. In addition, the alternative of eventual hook -up to an off -site treatment facility exists if, in the future, a Spokane Valley sewering project was developed. It is difficult to predict the impacts of these sewering alternatives not krowing the exact level of treatment anticipated. ;See Sewage Alternatives subsection of the Alternatives portion of this report, as these possible sewage disposal alternatives are examined.I c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts The possible sewage treatment alternatives would require environmental review by local, state and federal agencies having jurisdiction. Increased _costs of these facilities would be mitigated by funds acquired through taxes and user charges. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Increased cost for installation of dryline sewer and possible future operation and maintenance costs of a treatment facility. 7.5 Storm Water a. Existing Coalitions Storm water on the site is largely absorbed by the rapid permeability of on -site soils. Exceptional storm water on the site that exceeds capacity of indigenous soils follows natural drainageways to local temporary ponding areas. Current policy in the area is disposal of increased storm runoff by on -site disposal. (See Appendix A for Storm Drainage Report, Summerfield East.1 Most of the existing storm water systems are culverts with roadside ditches. There is a seasonal problem of spring runoff caning down the Forker Road Draw. The existing runoff control structures are in a poor state of repair and occasionally cause street flows over Forker Road near the northwest corner of the project. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action Increased storm water generated by 25% of the site being covered by impervious surfaces. 62 c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts The storm water runoff will be disposed of on site via drycell or similar devices. The engineering characteristics of these devices will be determined by consultation with the Spokane County Engineer. What the Spokane County Engineers will elect to do about the Porker Road runoff problem is not kn n at this time. It will most likely be a combination of restoration of the existing ditches and canals with a possible detention or retention structure constructed in the draw. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The possibility of a storm in excess of design standards is possible with resulting potential for minor local flooding and ponding. 7.6 Solid Waste a. Existing Conditions Solid waste pickup in the area is handled by Valley Garbage Service. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action The project would generate approximately 540 tons per year after full development. These materials would be disposed of at the sanitary landfill at Mica. (28) c Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts If the American demand for elaborate packaging of consumables were lessened, there could be a commensurate drop in generated garbage. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts None. 8. Human Health Human health . issues are addressed in sections on ground water quality and public services. The proposal does not pose any specific human health hazards. 9. Aesthetics N/A 10. Recreation (Refer to Section II, 5.4) 63 11. Archaeological/Historical a. Existing Conditions Representatives from the Spokane County Planning Department have indicated that no known archaeological site is located within the project area, but that properties within close proximity to the Spokane River have been designated archaeologically sensitive. During the mid- 1800's a military wagon route, the Mullan Road, was located within the general area, extending from Walla Walla, Washington to Fort Benton, Montana. No physical evidence of this trail exists today. b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action There exists a remote possibility that during the excavation and grading phase of the project objects of archaeological or historic interest may be discovered. c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts The remote possibility of archaeological sites or finds will require careful excavation and foundation digging, being aware that something could be found. Special instructions to contractors should be issued on what to look for and what to do if something is found. In the event historical or archaeological objects are revealed, the office of the Spokane County Planning Department shall be immediately notified. d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts None. 12. Additional Population Characteristics N/A 64 The Relationship Between Local Short -Term Uses of Man's Environment And The Maintenance and Enhancement of Long -Term Productivity Development of the 91 -acre site into a 258 -lot residential eo?niiunity will have an impact on the long term productivity of the property in terms of its present agricultural use. The property plays a small role in the agricultural economy of the region and therefore the loss of the current use will have a slight effect on agricultural produc- tivity in the Spokane area. The reduction of agricultural land, !marginal productivityn, considered in light of the increasing demand for moderate priced housing in the Spokane area, may be considered an enhancement of the long term productivity of the area. The "Generalized Comprehensive Plan, Spokane Metropolitan Area," designates the site as being appropriate for residential neighborhood. A comprehensive plan is intended to maximize the orderliness and productivity of an areas growth in the long term, therefore, the development of this site into a residential neighborhood will be the best use of the land in terms of maintenance and enhancement of long -term productivity for the area. The projedt may have an impact on the long -term productivity of the Valley Aquifer as a source of domestic water for the area. The use of sub - surface drainfields for disposal of waste water may pose a threat to ground water quality when considering the cumulative impact of this project with other developments in the Valley. (Data from the on -going "208" Water Study on quality of the aquifer will be available in the future to give more comparative and detailed information on this ground water quality question., The use of dry -line sewers or a central sewage treatment facility could, in later years, be connected to a central county or city sewage treatment facility if one were to be constructed or made available, thereby providing for long -term productivity of the aquifer. The project would enhance the long -term and short -term economic productivity and tax revenue picture for the area as well as provide new housing to meet the present short -term demands. 65 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources The 91 acre site will irreversibly and irretrievably commit the SuSerfield land to non - agricultural uses, resulting in a loss of cultivated wheat and barley or hay. The project will irreversibly and irretrievably commit other resources required during the construction phase, including labor, money, power, fossil fuels and building materials. After development of the project, the resident occupants will consume energy in the form of electricity and fossil fuels for lighting, heating and air - conditioning of each dwelling. (See Elements of the Human Environment, Section 6, for further discussion.* 66 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROM:J. The SEPA Guidelines require the EIS to include ". . a description and objective evaluation of any reasonable alternative action which could feasibly attain the objective of the proposal." These guidelines (NAC 197 -10- 440(121 note that reasonable alternatives shall include_ any action which might approximate the proposal's objective, but at a lower environmental cost or decreased level of environmental degradation. Also, the use of the term "reasonable" is intended to limit both the number and range of alternatives that shall be described and evaluated, as well as the amount or level of detail which the EIS shall employ for. each alternative that is discussed and evaluated. The analysis of alternatives should be, however, sufficiently detailed to permit a comparative evaluation of each alternative and the proposal. 1. No Action The site would remain in its present undeveloped state with limited agricultural production. The long term nature of the site cannot be guaranteed by the no- action alternative. Continued growth in the East Valley area, together with the locational advantage of the site in relation to nearby major transportation networks, public schools and employment centers will, no'doubt, result in an increase in land value and in development pressures for land use conversions to more intensive uses. In addition, the site is located within an area where similar residential development has taken place. The no- action alternative would eliminate both the adverse and beneficial impacts resulting from the proposed project and would not likely result in a delay in the eventual development of the site. 2. Development As Allowed Under Existing Zoning The site has been zoned Agricultural (A) and permits the following uses: Cultivation of land; nurseries, greenhouses; dairying; rabbitry; poultry raising; stock raising; roadside stands; single- family dwellings, (12,500 sq. ft. with 100 -ft. frontage); churches, libraries, museums; non - profit community halls and lodges; kindergarten and nursery schools; children's homes; hospital and sanitariums; feed mills; packing and processing plants and warehouses for agricultural purposes; a contractor's maintenance, repair and processing building and storage yard; an animal cemetery; commercial riding or boarding stables; schools or institutions of correction. In addition the agricultural zone permits the following "conditional uses" with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit: 67 Gun club and rifle range, golf driving range; garbage disposal dump; wne fur farms, auto wrecking yard; a duplex, trailer as a nursing hare; gocart tracks; kennels; sawmills and lumberyards; and a eu,iuuercial feed lot. Development under this alternative could result in similar, if rot more severe adverse environmental impacts than those identified for the proposed action. 3. Project Implementation at a Future Date Deterrring the project to some future period of time would only postpone the impacts identified for the proposed action. Project implementation at a future date could result in a more intensive future development due to increased costs. 4. Development of the Project on an Alternative Site The possibility of a similar residential subdivision on an alternative site is not a viable alternative for the project sponsors, since they do not own a similar parcel of .land with similar locational advantages. The primary intent of selecting an alternative site would be to reduce the impact on this vicinity's environment or to complete the project on another site for a lower overall environmental cost. Even if this sponsor owned an alternative site, the project could have more serious impacts than the present site. These problems might include: intrusion on significant floral habitats; lack of adequate access to major traffic ways; slope and erosion and /or slide hazards; greater distances from work, commercial and entertainment centers; and a greater distance from required services. Available building areas in the Spokane Valley, comparable in size to the project, tend to to be locited further from the commercial, employment and cultural centers of the area. 5. Alternative Residential Densities Development of the project at a lower residential density would proportionately reduce traffic generation, air pollution, and noise in the vicinity of the site. The demand for public services (parks, schools, fire and police' and utilities ;energy, water, and waste water treatment', would also be reduced. It is possible, however, that a significantly lower density would not be economically feasible to develop the project as proposed. Dryline sewers or a central collection treatment facility would not be economically feasible. Development at lower density would result in significantly higher per -unit development and purchase costs in terms of lard, improvements, and utilities. In addition, lower density developments require more land per housing unit, contributing to urban sprawl. Development of the project with a higher density would proportionately increase traffic generation, air pollution, and noise in the vicinity of the site. The demand for public services ;parks, schools, fire and police' and utilities ;energy, water, and waste -water treatments, would be increased. 63 It is possible, however, that a higher density development would be more economically feasible to support the required utilities and services required for the project. Development at a higher density would result in significantly lower per -unit development and purchasing cost. However, a higher density development could conflict with existing densities in the area depending on design techniques utilized. The second part of the alternatives to the proposed project review will be an analysis of the alternatives related to the method of waste water disposal on the site. The on -site systems which are available include septic tanks only and central collection treatment facilities. Septic Tank - Drainfield System The septic tank is a one or several compartment container designed to improve the effluent quality to prolong the life of the subsurface disposal field. Individual on -site septic tank and drainfield systems dispose of organic waste by biochemical anearobic decomposition in the septic tank. The effluent then flows to a drainfield where it is further processed by the soil oalumnm surrounding it, and the effluent then is disposed of by a combination of evaporation, transpiration from vegetation, and percolation. Percolation could normally only occur during wet winter months where precipitation exceeds evapotranspiration. Septic tanks and drainfields are easily installed, and don't require collector lines, pumps, blowers, precipitators, lift stations, etc., to perform their function. Properly installed and maintained, septic tank systems do not produce odors. Problems commonly associated with septic tank systems are usually due to lack of maintenance by the homeowner. Proper hcmeoaner maintenance would include pumping of the septic tank every three to seven years and replacement of the drainfield every five to 20 years. Depending on the actual configuration of the aquifer in the general area of the project, and other development activity in the Spokane Valley, the concentration of sewage related contaminants found in the ground water may, in isolated areas, approach the maximum allowed by the Federal Drinking Water Standards. The most recent "203 Study "* findings strongly suggest that contaminants associated with septic tank effluent are reaching the ground water and that concentrations of these contaminants are generally highest around the periphery of the aquifer. If these "208 Study" findings prove to be conclusive, then the use of septic tanks in projects such as Sumnerfiel.d East located near the periphery of the aquifer should be on an interim' basis. * Refer to the "208 Study ". 69 Central Collection and Interim Secondary Treatment This alternate includes a central collection system serving each residence in the project. Interim treatment would be provided by either a mechanical extended aeration plant or a system of aerated lagoons and polishing ponds. Effluent disposal would be via an extensive system of community drainfields. The treatment and effluent disposal facilities would be located within the Bonneville Power Administration easement immediately to the north of the proposed project. Sewage would be collected at the south end of the project and pumped north to the treatment site. The pumping facility would be equipped with standby power or storage to assure adequate service during power outages. The entire collection and treatment system would be operated by Spokane County. This completely public waste water system would have the flexibility of being connected to an area wide system in the future, and would receive reliable operation and maintenance. The effluent disposal system (drainfields■ may contribute contaminants to the ground water within a shorter time frame than if the project were served by individual septic tank and drainfield systems because the community drainfield system would be concentrated within a seven -acre area. This higher concentration would probably result in a higher percentage of the total quantity of effluent percolating into the soil. The higher percolation rate would likely result in a corresponding increased travel rate of sewage related contaminants through the soil column to the ground water. Discussion Because of EPA's Sole Source Designation of Spokane's aquifer, our increasing obligation to protect our source of drinking water, and the increasing evidence that sewage related contaminants are reaching the aquifer; it appears likely that the Spokane Valley will have a fairly extensive area with waste water management system within the next 10 to 15 years. Based on this assumption, the proposed system of dryline sewers and septic tanks rather than either of the alternatives appears to offer the best interim waste water management system for this project. On a short term basis, the sewage related contaminants will 70 most likely be transported toward the ground water at a slower rate and in lower concentrations than if community drainfields were used for effluent dispcsal. Onr a long term basis, the system can be connected to an area wide collection system with relative ease and the effluent transported to a regional plant where more extensive and sophisticated treatment is available. 71 1• FCC/MOMS Washington Climate, for these counties — Adams, Lincoln, Spokane, Whitman, May 65 page 7. 2. Climate Atlas of the United States, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968 72 APPENDIX A STORM DRAINAGE REPORT SUMMERFIFI n FAST 73 STORM DRAINAGE REPORT SUMMERFIE[.D EAST The proposed subdivision would plat 86 acres of cultivated farmland into approximately 266 lots ;typical lot size 10,000 sq. ft.). The roads would be paved with concrete curbs. Storm water disposal proposed by on -site dryce lls. For purposes of determining the effects of urbanization on storm water runoff in the drainage areas, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release No. 55 by the Engineering Division of the Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, January 1975 ( SCS Metlx:d% , will be used. 1) To determine peak rates of runoff from the overall project. % of SCS a. Soil Tune Basin Basin Classification Garrison Gravelly Loam Overall 100% B Description of Soils: The soil is made up of sanewhat excessively drained, gravelly or stony soils that form- ed under grass in glacial outwash and has moderately rapid permeability. b. Slope of the basin 0% — 88 c. Roughly 100% of the land is cultivated with conservation treatment. Present condition yields a Runoff Curve Num- ber (NI of 71. Future conditions of 1/4 acre residential lots, approximately 40% impervious, yields a CN of 75. d. The 24 -hour precipitation for the area for a 50 -year storm is 2.4 inches. e. Use of attached Figures I & II 21 Calculations: a. Overall basin present runoff Area = 86 acres CN = 71 Runoff depth = .46 in. Flat slope of 1% Peak discharge = 27cfs /in. Slope factor - 1.00 Q = 1. (27 cfs /in.) .46 in. = 12.40 cfs 74 Overall basin future runoff CN = 77 Runoff depth = .70 Peak discharge = 35 cfs /in. Slope factor 1.00 Q = 1;35) .70 = 24.5 cfs 3) Drainage Proposal From the resulting calculations, we see that the plat will double the runoff with future development. Requirements ? -I that one double barrel drywell will dispose of one cfs. With this in mind, we see that there are nearly 25 cfs of runoff neeU'i; ; to lie disposed of during a 50 -year storm resulting in a minimum recommended 25 drywells. Using past subdivision development studies in the valley area in similar soils, I have cane up with some figures showing that one drycell is needed for every four to six residential lots. Using an average of five, this could mean that a possible 57 dryse lls mild be proposed for the plat site. There would be some off -site drainage flow from the back lots along the west project boundary and the adjacent lots along the school site property. The flows crossing these boundaries will be minimal. For this plat, on-site disposal is practical and capable of relieving the runoff. Along with this study of the plat area, we have studied the drainage area above the plat which during high runoff periods of the year has overflowed the nearby unimproved canal and created problems over the roadway and along the boundary of the proposed project site. I have come up with some calculations based on the Spokane County Soil Survey and the Soil Conservation Service TR *55. These calculations sow that there could be some reasonably high flows. Calculations: 450 Acres Class "B" Sub Area I = 645 acres ;125 acres Class "C ", 70 acres Class "A "+ 75 Reach Description of flow Slope (%i A to B Cultivated farm land 3 B to C Shallow draw thin stand forest 3 C to D Steeper draw thin stand forest 7 235 Acres Class "B" Sub Area II = 360 acres (20 acres Class "A ", 105 acres Class "C "1 Sub Area III = 220 acres (20 acres Class "A ", 200 acres Class "B "" Sub Area I Reach A - B 2380 ft. = 2975 sec. .8 ft /sec B - C 3170 ft. = 2641 sec. 1.2 ft /sec C - D 3350 ft. = 1914 sec. Sub Area II Reach Description of flow Slope (% A to B Shallow draw thin stand forest 20 B to C Shallow draw thin stand forest 5 C to D Steeper draw thin stand forest 8 Reach Description of flow A to B Steep draw thin stand forest B to C Steep draw thin stand forest Reach A - B B - C C - D 1.75 ft /sec 1980 ft. = 619 sec. 3.2 ft /sec 1.6 ft /sec 2.0 ft /sec Tc = 7530 sec. 3600 sec./hr = 2.1 hr. 4360 ft. = 2725 sec. 3960 ft. = 1980 sec. Tc = 5324 sec 3600 sec/hr = 1.5 hr 76 7530 sec. Length (ft.I 2380 3170 3350 Length (ft.' 1980 4360 3960 Slone ( %l Length ( ft.1 16 3160 12 2770 Sub Area III Peach A - B 3160 ft. = 1128 sec. 2.8 ft. /sec. Sub Area I • Sub Area II B - C 2770 ft. = 1154 sec. 2.4 ft. /sec. Land Use Acres ON Product Cultivated Land (Group 0 125 78 9,750 Cultivated Land ;Group By 120 71 8,520 Thin Stand Forest (Group N 70 45 3,150 Thin Stand Forest (Group BI 330 66 21,780 645 43,200 Weighted CN = 43200 = 67 645 Land Use Acres ON Product Thin Stand Forest (Group Ai 20 45 900 Thin Stand Forest (Group 0 40 77 3,080 • Thin Stand Forest (Group BY 115 66 7,590 Cultivated Land (Group 0 65 78 5,070 Cultivated Land (Group Et 120 71 8,520 360 25,160 Weighted CN = 25160 = 70 360 Sub Area III Land Use ' Acres ON Product Pasture Poor (Group P 20 68 1,360 Pasture Poor (Group BY 120 79 9,480 Thin Stand Timber ;Group B1 80 66 5,280 220 16,120 Weighted CN = 16120 = 73 220 77 2282 sec. Tc = 2282 sec. = .6 hr. 3600 sec/hr Sub Area Drain Area Time of Concentration Runoff Curve Runoff* 1 1 1 (mi.l (hours' Number. lino 1 I 1.00 2.10 67 .33 II .55 1.50 70 .42 III .35 .60 73 .51 1 *Table 2 -1 for 50 -year 24 -hour precipitation P = 2.4 inches Rainfall 1 (inchesi CN 65 67 70 73 75 2.0 .14 .24 .38 1 2.4 .27 .33 .42 .51 .60 2.5 .30 .46 .65 DISCHARGE SUMMARY 1 Sub Drainage Rain - Run- 12.1 12.5 12.9 13.0 1 area Tc Area fall CN off hr. hr. hr. hr. (hr.i (mi.j (ino (inO (cfs1 (cfs (cfsi (cfsl I 2.1 1.00 2.4 67 .33 21 31 56 60 1 II 1.5 .55 2.4 70 .42 24 48 55 52 III .6 .35 2.4 73 .51 62 37 23 20 1 Total Composite Hydrograph at End of Areas 107 116 121 132 Use 150 cfs for a conservative number. 1 Determine flow in trapezoidal open channel. 1 Existing canal cross section along project boundary: Width = 4.0' 6' deep known Q = 150 cfs during high runoff 1 14' wide at top Side Slope = .5:1 Q = 1.49 x AR 2/3 S 1/2 11 n assume n = .035 1 trial depth of 4.0 gives Q = 138 cfs trial depth of 4.1 gives Q = 148 cfs 1 78 11 Assuming depth of Channel to be 4.1' high, then we can assume that the culverts are of improper sizing, causing the canal to breech. Using "Handbook of Steel Drainage & Highway Construction Products," published by American Iron and Steel Institute, a culvert of 50" in diameter would be needed to handle that high of flow at the existing slope of the culverts. There are none of that size to be found along the canal system. As shown on the plat map, there are a few things that could be done to help insure the safety of the proposed project site. 79 An alternate method to dispose of the stormwater runoff coming from the above drainage basin would be to construct a retention pond at the northast boundary of. the proposed plat. The pond would be approx- imately 2 acres in surface area and have a depth of five (5V feet. The pond would have the capacity to retain the peak flow of 132 cfs and dispose of it for its duration. The construction of this pond would involve grading the topsoil away and incorporating it into the dike walls. The computations are as follows using Spokane County Soil Survey percolation rate of 10 "/hour in Garrison Gravelly Soil. 3 434,000 ft 3 2 ac. (43560 ft acre ALDENDUM TO SLM+'IERFIELD EAST DRAE1AGE RFEPORT 2 2 acres (43560 ft ) 10 ft. 1 hr. acre 12 hr 3600 sec. From graph: Storage required for Area I - 204,000 ft Storage required for Area II - 112,000 ft Storage required for Area III - 118,000 ft 80 = 20 cfs infiltration rate 3 3 3 434,000 ft 3 For a storm of a greater frequency an overflow structure could be constructed to take the flaw along Forker Road to the existing ditch and allowed to bypass the plat. APPENDIX B LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUM EPFIELD EAST 31 AND EXCEPT Wellesley Avenue; Legal Description 1 Preliminary Plat Sumnerfield East That portion of the NW 1/4 of Section 35, T. 26 N., R. 44 E.W.M., in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, lying southeasterly of Forker Road and southwesterly of the power line easement as recorded on January 19, 1943, under Auditor's File No. 572309A; ALSO the E 1/2 E 1/2 SW 1/4 of said section; AND ALSO that portion of the W 1/2 of the E 1/2 of said section lying southwesterly of said power line easement; EXCEPT the Spokane Valley Land & Water Company's canal right -of -way; AND EXCEPT commencing at the southwest corner of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said section; thence east along the south line of said section, a distance of 350 feet; thence north, a distance of 933.42 feet; thence west a distance of 700 feet; thence south a distance of 933.42 feet to the south line of said Section 35; thence east along the south line of said section, a distance of 350 feet, to the point of beginning; AND EXCEPT that portion of the NW 1/4 of.said section lying within Plat #4, West Farms Irrigated Tracts as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, Page 51. 82 ' • 11 1 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 11 APPENDIX C 3CNNEVILLE POKER ASDIINISrRATION POWER LINE EASEMENT 83 BONNEVILLE POWER LINE ADMINISTRATION POWER LINE EASE ELT That portion of the N.1/2 of the N.W.1 /4, the S.W.1 /4 of the N.E.1 /4, the N.W.1 /4 of the S.E.1 /4, the N.1/2 of the S.E.1 /4 of the N.W.1 /4 and the S.E.1 /4 of the S.E.1 /4 of the N.W.1/4 of Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 East of the Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington; which lies within a strip of land 500 feet in width, the boundaries of said strip lying 175 feet distant northeasterly from and 325 feet distant southeasterly from and parallel to the survey line of the Grand Coulee Spokane transmission lines 3 and 4 as now located and staked on the ground, over, across, upon and /or adjacent to the above - described property, said survey line being particularly described as follows: Beginning at survey station 445 +50.0 a point on the north line of Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 East f the Willamette Meridian, said point being N. 88 degrees 59' E. a distance of 703.5 feet from the N.W. corner of said Section 35; thence S. 43 degrees 39' E. a distance of 5933.5 feet to survey station 504 +83.5; thence S. 0 degrees 59' E. a distance of 949.9 feet to survey station 514 +33.4 a point on the S. line of said Section 35, said point being S. 89 degrees 36' W. a distance of 510.1 feet from the S.E. corner of said Section 35. The aforesaid easement and right -of -way is for the following purposes, namely: the perpetual right to enter and to erect, maintain, repair, rebuild, operate, and patrol one or more electric power transmission lines, and one or more telephone and /or telegraph lines, including the right to erect such poles and other transmission line structures, wires, cables, and the appurtenances as are necessary thereto; the further right to clear said right -of -wav and keep the same clear of brush, timber, inflammable structures, and fire hazards; and the right to remove danger trees, if anv, located beyond the limits of said right-of-way. To have and to hold the said easement and right -of -way unto the United States of America and its assigns, forever. It is further understodd and agreed by the undersigned that the payment of such purchase price is accepted as full compensation for all damages incidental to the exercise of any of the rights above described. 84 FINAL • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT • Y ) diatizaer .SANiIL°AfY 1979 LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SUMMERFIELD EAST Prepared for William W. Main Investment Co. and T. D. C. Inc. Lead Agency: Spokane County January, 1979 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CORP. E. 12720 Nora Spokane, Washington 99216 The proposed action was initiated by William W. Main Investment Company and T. D. C. Inc. The 91 acre site is located in the Spokane Valley, north of Wellesley Avenue, west of Sullivan Road and east of Evergreen Road. The lead agency for this proposal is Spokane County, and the responsible • official is Fred Dayharsh, Director of the Spokane County Planning Department, N. 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington 99260; telephone (509) 456 -2274. The proposed action may require the following legal actions and permits: (1) Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements; • (2) Zone reclassification approval; (3) Preliminary and Final Plat approval of Summerfield East; (4) Approvals or permits from the Spokane County Health District, the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services and the Washington State Department of Ecology for design and operation of a sewage disposal system; and • (5) The obtaining of all required building permits, inspections and approvals. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement was issued on October 31, 1978, and the review and comment period ended on December 5, 1978. • The circulation of this document is prescribed in the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10 -600) which directs that the Final EIS must go to "the Department of Ecology, Office of the Governor or the Governor's designee, the Ecological Commission, agencies with jurisdiction, and federal agencies with jurisdiction, which received the Draft EIS. The Final EIS may be obtained • from the Spokane County Planning Department for the cost of reproduction and mailing. This Final Environmental Impact Statement was prepared by Inland Pacific Engineering and Construction Company under the supervision of the County of Spokane as the lead agency. The official date of issue of the • Final Environmental Impact Statement is January 11, 1979. • • INTRODUCTION The proposed action under review is for a 268 lot residential preliminary plat and zone reclassification from the Agricultural Zone to the Single Family Residential Zone. Both the preliminary plat and zone reclassification applications have been submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for public hearings. i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION LIST OF MAPS AND FIGURES LIST OF TABLES AND CHARTS iv DISTRIBUTION LIST V SUMMARY OF THE CONTENTS OF THE DRAFT EIS vi SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATING MEASURES xvii DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL 1 IMPACT ANALYSIS 6 LIST OF ELEMENTS OF THE ENVIRONMENT 6 Elements of the Physical Environment 9 1. Earth 9 2. Air 14 3. Water 20 4. Flora 34 5. Fauna 36 6. Noise 37 7. Light and Glare 39 8. Land Use 39 9. Natural Resources 43 10. Risk of Explosion or Hazardous Emission 44 Elements of the Human Environment 45 1. Population 45. 2. Economics 47 3. Housing 48 4. Transportation /Circulation 49 5. Public Services 52 6. Energy 58 7. Utilities 60 8. Human Health 63 9. Aesthetics 63 10. Recreation 63 11. Archaeological /Historical 64 12. Additional Population Characteristics 64 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT -TERM USES OF MAN'S ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF LONG -TERM PRODUCTIVITY 65 APPENDICES A 73 APPENDICES B 81 APPENDICES C 83 ADDENDUM FINAL EIS COMMENTS AND RESPONSES 86 ii • IRREVERSIBLE AND /OR IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS OF RESOURCES 66 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSAL 67 • FOOTNOTES 72 • • • • • • • • LIST OF MAPS AND FIGURES Vicinity Map 3 Area Map 4 Site Plan 5 Soils Map 10 Topography Map 13 Aquifer Location and Seismic Profile 23 Aquifer Transmissivity Distribution 25 Water Sampling Location 27 Water Quality 30 Water Service Locations 33 Land Use Map 40 Zoning Map 42 Average Daily Traffic Count Map 50 iii LIST OF TABLES AND CHARTS Suspended Particulate Summary 15 1976 Carbon Monoxide Levels 17 Arithmetic Mean of "208" Study Wells 28 208 Irvin Well Arithmetic Mean by Depth 29 Population Growth in the Spokane Area 45 Population Projection for Spokane County 46 Schools Impacted by Project 55 Available Parks and Recreational Facilities 56 iv • • • • DISTRIBUTION LIST U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle U. S. Soil Conservation Service, Spokane Wash. State Department of Ecology, Olympia (2) (Note: 1 copy to SEPA Register) Wash. State Ecological Commission Dept. of Ecology, Olympia Wash. State Dept. of Ecology, Spokane Wash. State Department of Fisheries, Olympia Wash. State Department of Transportation, Olympia Wash. State Department of Natural Resources, Colville Wash. State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia Wash. State Office of Programming, Planning, & Fiscal Management, Olympia Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority, Spokane County Building Department, Spokane County Engineering Department, (5) Spokane County Park & Recreation Department, Spokane County Planning Commission, (1) Spokane County Planning Department (10) Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney, Civil Division (2) Spokane County Health District, Environmental Health Division (1) Spokane County Conservation District Spokane County Public Library (2 Spokane Regional Planning Conference (2) City of Spokane Public Library (1) Washington Water Power Company Spokane Valley Herald East Valley High School East Valley Junior High School Trentwood Elementary School East Valley School District No. 361 Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3 v SUMMARY OF THE CONTENTS OF THE DRAFT EIS Purpose and Objectives The sponsors visualize Summerfield East as a response to the rapid growth the Spokane area is experiencing. It is the intent of the sponsors to economically provide an environmentally planned residential development to include a public water system, paved and curbed streets, storm drainage facilities designed to meet the approval of the Spokane County Health District, and underground utilities. It is anticipated that the project will provide a full range of housing units which will include housing opportunities for younger families with moderate incomes. Proposal The proposed project is a planned residential development of approximately 91 acres with 268 lots, which will require the approval of a preliminary plat and zone reclassification by the Spokane County Board of Commis- sioners. The site is located in the Spokane Valley, north of Wellesley Avenue, south of the Forker Road - Progress Road intersection, and west of Progress Road. The development is planned to be phased over a six -year period of time with 48 homes to be constructed in 1979 and with 44 units constructed each year for a five -year period. Project phasing, however, will be subject to market conditions. vi • Elements of the Physical Environment 1. Earth Direct and Indirect Impacts Disruption, displacement, compaction and overcovering of soil will occur, as well as minimal alteration of topographical contours, which may result in minor wind and water erosion during the construction phase. Approximately 25 percent of the site will consist of paving and structures. Mitigating Measures Containment of earth movement within roadway corridors and foundation areas. Replacement of soils where disturbed. The design of streets and homesites in harmony with local topography. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts 4P Minor reconfiguration of approximately 25 percent of the site. Increased erosion potential during the construction phase. 2. Air Direct and Indirect Impacts Short term air quality degradation will result during the construction phase, with increased suspended particulate and equipment carbon monoxide emissions. Long term impacts will result from increased vehicular emissions and from home heating units. Ambient increases are not to exceed Federal levels. Future sewage collection systems may generate obnoxious odors. Mitigating Measures During construction, dust will be controlled by use of water; and phasing will localize the source of suspended particulate emissions. Paving of roadways and the enforcement of County air quality standards will mitigate vehicular related emission increases. Public transportation should be encouraged. 3. Water Direct and Indirect Impacts Surface water movement and runoff /absorption will be altered as a result of impervious surfaces covering approximately 25 percent of the site. The project will not increase the hazard of flooding in the area; however, existing flooding along Forker Road may impact the project. vii • • • • • There are three sources that may impact ground water quality: approximately 80,000 gallons of waste water per day, storm water runoff and the use of chemicals (fertilizer, herbicides, etc.). Waste water disposal may be considered the most significant source, but the quality of the potential effluent reaching the aquifer from a subsurface drainfield will be improved over the quality of the effluent discharged to the • drainfield because of biochemical treatment mechanisms that occur as the effluent passes through the soil column above the ground water. (Soil column ranges in depth from 80 to 110 feet). To try to quantify the impacts of this development to the aquifer quality would be extremely difficult, if not futile. The "208" Water Quality • Management Program, being conducted by Spokane County in cooperation with the U.S.G.S., U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Washington State Department of Ecology, have not to date provided any definite conclusion regarding recharge of the aquifer by drainfield, storm water effluent, or chemical use over the aquifer. It is anticipated that in the near future, the "208" will have a Cause and Effect Report dealing with the • impact of urbanization on the aquifer. Current data indicates the edges of the aquifer show generally higher levels of pollutants than the main body of the aquifer. It is estimated that the project will result in the withdrawal of approximately 532,000 gallons of water per day at peak flow (summertime • use). Trentwood Irrigation District will provide water for domestic use and for required fire flow. • • • • Mitigating Measures A Spokane County Storm Water Management Plan would mitigate the drainage problems caused by runoff in the Forker Road drainage basin. In addition, two methods of controlling storm water from this basin are available to the project sponsor and are identified in the Summerfield East Storm Drainage Report (see Appendix A). Increases in runoff, a result of impervious surfaces, will be mitigated by the provision of on - site disposal, with use of drywells, curbs, gutters and appropriate street design. Proper drainfield site selection, proper installation operation and maintenance will mitigate the potential for ground water contamination. The installation of dry -line sewers will allow for more flexible sewering alternatives in the future which may mitigate the potential for ground water contamination. The ground water impact could be mitigated by reducing the density of the proposal. However, a lower density project may exclude a number of sewer alternatives. viii Unavoidable Adverse Impacts There is a possibility of drainfield effluent or surface water runoff reaching the aquifer. The "208" Water Quality Management Program is being conducted to determine the extent and magnitude of contamination. The long term commitment of water from the aquifer to serve the project should be considered unavoidable. 4. Flora Direct and Indirect Impacts The project will result in the permanent disruption of current prime agricultural soils for road right -or -ways and homesites. The existing flora will be replaced with lawns, shrubs, trees and backyard gardens. Mitigating Measures The permanent disruption of the current agricultural land may be mitigated by the introduction of lawns, shrubs, trees, flowers and backyard gardens. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Permanent removal of agricultural crops on site. 5. Fauna Direct and Indirect Impacts A decrease in the number and /or diversity of wildlife that inhabit the area will occur. Mitigating Measures The retention of as much natural vegetation as possible, as well as the introduction of landscaping. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The permanent removal and disruption of a portion of the wildlife habitat 40 is an unavoidable adverse impact. ix • • • • • • • • • Direct and Indirect Impacts • Increases in noise levels during the construction phase and during the suburban residential period' will occur. Noise will be generated from vehicle traffic and construction activities. • • 6. Noise Mitigating Measures The increase in noise levels may be mitigated by limitation of construction activities to normal working hours, by noise buffering provided by home insulation and by the use of proper mufflers and vehicle - quieting devices. Unavoidable Impacts The increased noise levels resulting from the construction phase and from the suburban residential period may be considered an unavoidable adverse impact to some, but the increases will not exceed State and Federal standards. 7. Light and Glare • Direct and Indirect Impacts Artificial light will be required for street lighting, interior and exterior residential use, and for nighttime vehicle use. Mitigating Measures The use of low intensity street lighting, as well as generous use of landscaping and careful planning when determining exact building locations, will help to reduce the impacts of light and glare. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The project will result in increases in light and glare. 8. Land Use Direct and Indirect Impacts The project will result in a change in the land use of the site from a vacant parcel used for agricultural purposes to a single family residental development. The 91 acre site is proposed for a 268 lot subdivision, (gross density of 2.9 lots per gross acre), a density that would be compatible with the surrounding residential uses and compatible with the "Generalized Comprehensive Plan, Spokane Metropolitan Area." x Mitigating Measures With the use of an Architectural Control Committee, restrictive covenants, the application of controls available with planning, zoning and subdivision regulations, and the establishment of an orderly pattern of development and project phasing, adverse land use impact could be mitigated. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Those who desire to maintain the site in its present rural state may view the proposed land use as an unavoidable adverse impact. 9. Natural Resources Direct and Indirect Impacts During the construction phase of the project, building materials will be consumed; and during the suburban residential period, energy in the form of fuels will be consumed. Prime agricultural soils on the site will be devoted to residental land use. Mitigating Measures Conservation techniques during the construction phase and during the sub- urban residential period may minimize the consumption of natural resources. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The project will consume natural resources during the construction phase and during the residential period. In addition, the use of pure agricultural soils for residential soils is unavoidable. 10. Risk of Explosion or Hazardous Emissions N/A Elements of the Human Environment 1. Population Direct and Indirect Impacts Summerfield East will provide 268 lots for the same number of single - family residential units, to be constructed over a six -year period of time. Assuming the population multiplier of 3.5 persons per single family dwelling, the completed project will provide housing for 938 persons. Mitigating Measures Careful planning and the development and implementation of land use regulation can reduce population impacts. xi • • Unavoidable Adverse Impacts A population increase in this area may be considered by some as an unavoidable and adverse impact. 2. Housing Direct and Indirect Impacts Summerfield East will provide 268 lots for 268 single - family residential 1 units, with home selling prices ranging from $40,000 to $85,000. Mitigating Measures Project phasing will tend to ease the impact along with careful planning and the implementation of land -use regulations. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Housing increases in this area may be considered by some as an unavoidable and adverse impact. • 3. Economics Direct and Indirect Impacts The project will require expenditures for payrolls and for the purchase of materials, supplies and services, while the completed project will increase the assessed taxable value of the site and the proposed improvements to $16,750,000.00 (1978) Mitigating Measures None • Unavoidable Adverse Impacts None 4. Transportation /Circulation f Direct and Indirect Impacts The project will create an estimated 2,144 one -way vehicle trips per day. The transportation and circulation pattern of the area should remain the 41 same even with the proposed increases. The existing primary and secondary roads proposed to serve the site can handle the increased capacity. xii The project will include an extensive internal roadway system that will integrate with the existing roadway network and will be curbed and paved. The increase in traffic generated by the project will also increase traffic hazards. Mitigating Measures The development of public transportation, car pooling, the encouragement of bicycle and pedestrian traffic, and street layouts which discourage high speeds, with adequate traffic controls, such as stop signs, where needed, will mitigate potential transportation hazards. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts • Increased traffic volumes and hazards in the vicinity of the site are unavoidable adverse impacts. 5. Public Services Direct and Indirect Impacts Additional services will be required from many public agencies as a result of the project, including Fire District No. 1, the Spokane County Sheriff's Department and the Washington State Patrol, East Valley School District No.. 361, park departments, maintenance agencies, health department, etc. Mitigating Measures The increased demand for public services as a result of the project will be mitigated by the increased property tax revenue generated by the project. The impact on the schools will be mitigated by the expansion of facilities provided through special levies and tax dollars. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts This project will increase the demands for fire and police protection, educational and recreational facilities, and for the maintenance of the above mentioned and other governmental services. Delivery of these services, at least initially, exceeds any offset due to increased tax dollars. 6. Energy • Direct and Indirect Impacts The project will require energy during the construction phase and it is estimated that the development, when completed, will consume approximately 10.9 million kilowatt hours of electricity per year and an estimated • • • 134,000 therms per year of natural gas (based on heating needs of 25 percent of the project). Current energy sources are adequate to serve the project. Indirect increases in consumption of energy and fossil fuels can be expected. Mitigating Measures Energy conservation techniques for home use will mitigate energy consumption impacts. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts • The project will result in increased consumption of energy for heating, cooking, lighting, general household use and transportation. s • 7. Utilities Direct and Indirect Impacts The project will result in increased demands on communication service from the Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, energy from Washington Water Power Company (see Energy, Section No. 6), water from Trentwood Irrigation District, on -site sewage disposal and storm drainages,, and solid waste from Valley Garbage Service. Mitigating Measures Close coordination between the project sponsor and the affected utilities should mitigate potential impacts, as well as implement an appropriate plan by pertinent utilities. Approval of on -site sewage disposal and storm drainage systems by the appropriate State and County agencies. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts • The project will result in increases in utility service. 8. Human Health (Refer to Section 5 "Other Governmental Services "). • 9. Aesthetics N/A 10. Recreation '• (Refer to Section 5 "Parks and Other Recreational Facilities "). xiv 11. Archaeological /Historical Direct and Indirect Impacts A slight possibility of the unearthing of archaeological finds on the site exists. Mitigating Measures Contractors can be made aware of potential archaeological finds, what to look for, and what to do if something is found. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Possible disturbance of subsurface archaeological resources. 12. Additional Population Characteristics N/A xv • • • Alternative Densities • A lower density development would mitigate impacts on air, traffic, noise, utiliies, public services, etc., but would result in higher per unit cost of housing, utilities and services, and could reduce the number of sewage alternatives. A higher density development would increase the environmental impacts, but • would allow for less expensive housing, utilities and services; and allow for more revenue to be used toward mitigation of the adverse impacts. Sewage Alternatives Septic Tank - Drainfield - will function with minimum maintenance, does not centrally collect effluent, does not provide flexibility for future sewer alternatives, allows for individual home owner maintenance and operation, and may have an impact on ground water. Central Collection Treatment - provides a minimum of primary and secondary treatment of effluent, eliminates the need for individual home owners to • operate and maintain a separate system, thus assuring better maintenance, and may have an impact on ground water. xvi • No Action Alternatives The site would remain in agricultural production, but because of the continued growth in the East Valley area, no action today would most likely result in a delay in the eventual development of the site. Development Presently Permitted The site has the Agricultural Zone (A) classification, a land use classification for an area suitable for farming and agricultural pursuits. Development under this alternative could result in similar if not more severe adverse environmental impacts than those identified for the proposed action. Project Implementation in the Future Could result in demands for a more intensive future development due to increased costs. Alternative Site Project sponsors do not own a similar parcel of land with similar locational advantages. If there was an alternate site available, the same environmental elements, traffic, site development, air quality, water quality, noise, light, glare, utilities and services, etc., would be impacted. (Less ground water impact if site not located over aquifer.) IMPACTS 1. Soil - Disruption, dis- placement, compaction, undercovering and over - covering of soils. 2. Topography - Minimal alternations in topography. 3. Erosion - Wind and water erosion. 4. Air - Dust during con- struction phase and carbon monoxide level increases from automobiles. 5. Odor - Paving activities during construction. Future sewer alternatives may gen- erate odors. Typical vehicle exhaust odors. 7. Floods - Existing Forker Road flooding may impact project. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATING MEASURES xvii MITIGATING MEASURES 1. Returning affected soils to original condition; the con- tainment of earth movement within a specific area. 2. Design of streets and lots in harmony with existing topography. 3. Use of water to hold down dirt during construction. Paving and landscaping will reduce wind and water erosion. 4. The use of water sprays and dust pollutives during con- struction. Construction under the authority of SCAPCA; paving of all roads; and the implementation of Federal Auto Emission Control Standards. 5. Proper operation and maintenance of sewage disposal systems, Implementation of Federal Auto Emission Control Standards. 6. Water - Increased surface 6. Provision for drywells will water runoff. compensate for on -site runoff. 7. (a) Spokane County Storm Manage- ment Plan (b) Storm Drainage Facility as described in Appendix A of the DEIS • • • • IMPACTS 8. Ground Water Quality - Peak water useage of 665,000 gallons per day. 14. Noise - Noise impacts related 14. construction, vehicular traffic, general human activ- ity and minor mechanical 15. Light and Glare - Street lighting; auto lights. MITIGATING MEASURES 8. Use of low water using fixtures and appliances. 9. Ground Water Quantity - Waste 9. Installation of dryline sewers; water collection treatment, sediment basins within drywells. disposal facilities, and storm -water drainage systems will impact ground water. 10. Public Water Supplies - Peak 10. Use of low water using fixtures water useage of 665,000 gal- and appliances. Ions per day. 11. Flora - Numbers or Diversity 11. Landscaping; introduction of of Species - Permanent dis- similar cropland elsewhere. ruption of the agricultural use of the site. 12. Agricultural Crops - Perma- 12. Back -yard gardens; introduction nent disruption of the of similar cropland elsewhere. agricultural uses of the site. 13. Fauna - Numbers or Diversity 13. Retention of as much natural of Species - Permanent vegetation as possible; land - disruption of a majority of soaping and plantings. existing animal habitat. Limitation of construction activities from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.; noise buffering by insulated walls; properly noise. operating mufflers, shutting off idling equipment. 15. Use of low intensity street lighting, generous use of landscaping, adjustment of lot lines at T intersections. IMPACTS 17. Natural Resources - Perma- nent disruption of agricul- tural use, natural resources consumed during construction and energy after construction. MITIGATING MEASURES 16. Land Use - Change in land use 16. Establishment of an orderly from agricultural to residen- pattern of development and tial. project phasing; an Architec- tural Control Committee and restrictive covenants; Land Use Controls and Planning Com- mission Review. 17. Use of a variety of energy and and other conservation techniques. 18. Population - On site increase 18. Careful land use planning and of 938 people. effective implementation of policies and regulations. 19. Housing - An addition of 19. Project phasing. 268 single- family dwellings. 20. Transportation /Circulation - 20. Transit, carpooling, pedestrian Vehicular Transportation access to schools. An additional 2,144 one -way vehicle trips per day. 21. Transportation Systems - Several hundred trips per day to Wellesley Avenue, Sullivan Road, Trent Ave., I -90, etc. 22. Movement /Circulation of People or Goods - Increase in activity. 23. Traffic Hazards - An ad- ditional 2,144 one -way vehicle trips per day. 21. Transit, carpooling, pedestrian access to schools. 22. Transit, carpooling, pedestrian access to schools. 23. Good design in street layouts, proper signing, provision for sidewalks along arterials, ade- quate accesses to arterials and separate access to the elementary school. xix • • • • • • • IMPACTS 24. Public Services, Fire - 268 . new residences will require the fire protection services of Fire District No. 1 25. Police - Increase in service 25. requirement of law enforce- ment agencies. 27. Parks and Recreation - Increased usage of area parks and facilities. 28. Maintenance - Addition of 2.8 miles of roads, water, power, and phone lines. 30 Energy - Use of energy during 30. construction, and once the project is completed 24. Use of non - combustible mater- ials, use of smoke detection devices, water mains and hy- drant extensions, compliance with fire codes and zoning setbacks. xx MITIGATING MEASURES Lighting, structure design, adequate access, and readable addresses. 26. Schools - Additional school 26. Proper planning, temporary age children; 268 elementary classrooms and additional students, 134 junior high tax base. students, and 134 high school students. 27. School site play equipment, and additional tax base. 28. Tax revenues and monthly service charges. 29. Other Governmental Services - 29. Use of cluster mailboxes and Extension of potential ser- additional tax revenues. vice as well as other govern- ment services. Adequate insulation in roof, walls, and ceilings to reduce heat transmission. Use of high performance fur- naces that can recover waste heat from flue gas or those with a flue shut -off. Use of heat retaining fire- places or wood stoves. Use of high - performance air - conditioning units (if ab- solutely necessary for climate control) with open -air cycles. IMPACTS 30. Energy (continued) • MITIGATING MEASURES 1 • 30. Provision of storm windows and storm doors. Provision of windows that can be opened and closed. Use of tinted glass in windows. Double -glass windows. Use of landscaping on the south and west sides of the build- ings. Provisions for screens, shades, and curtains. Well- ventilated attics. Use of dark - colored roofs. Use of flourescent rather than incandescent lights. xxi • • • • • • • • • ADDENDUM FINAL EIS COMMENTS AND RESPONSES The following pages contain the comments received on the Summerfield East Draft Environmental Impact Statement. The written comments are reproduced in their actual form in which they were received on the left side of the page, and the Spokane County responses on the right side of the page. 86 Box 190 Colville, Wa 99114 Nov 7, 1978 Spokane County Planning Commission N. 721 Jefferson Broadway Centre Building Spokane, Wa 99260 Attn: Fred Deyharsh RE: Environmental Impact Statement of Summerfield East. Dear Mr. Deyharsh: I have reviewed the draft Environmental Impact Statement for the above mentioned subdivision and feel that the Department of Natural Resources has no questions or comments on any part of this development, as it does not lie in our fire protection area or adjacent to any lands managed by the Department of Natural Resources. If I can be of further assistance please contact me. Sincerely BERT L. COLE Commissioner of Public Lands Walt Wruble (_) k. Spokane Local Manager Northeast Area WW:bl STATE OF WASHINGTON Deter ce4ue e 4 cc: Philip Hildebrand, Area Manager Bill Boyes, Operations Forester Ross Hesseltine, Arcadia District Manager 87 coMWB40NER• BERT L. COLE R. A. BERWICK SUPERVISOR • • • • AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER • • • • • • No response required. 88 CITY OF SPOKANE. WASHINGTON SPOKANE �S moecin fin it Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Attention: Fred Dayharsh, Spokane County Planning Director Dear Mr. Dayharsh: Subject: EIS Summerfield East I have reviewed the above EIS and as always have a concern with the effects of development over the Spokane Aquifer. This development and more like it are eventually going to have some effect on this valuable water resource. Due to the extensive studies of the aquifer most recently being completed through the "208" Program and the Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection Agencies involvement, I would support recommendation by these agencies on mitigating measures to protect this water resource. ETC:GOZ:vjd 89 November 13, 1978 Sincer:ly, E -Terry Clegg Planning Direc or ECEI)E® N0V w 01978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY PLAN COMMISSION • 309 City Hall RICHARD M. BARRETT, President VAUGHN P. CALL, A.I.P. Manager — Planning E. T. CLEGG, A.I.P. Planning Director • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • This comment is noted. 90 TO: FROi'i: SUBJECT: 1. Page viii - Amend first sentence to read: " ** *approximately 80,000 to 93,800 gallons of domestic wastewater * * * ". 5. Page 31 - In first sentence, substitute word impacted for compacted. Reason: Accuracy. SCHU- ADM -11£3 Eugene C. Pra , R.S. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Inter - Office Communication Spokane County Planning Department 91 Date: C. 1/4— November 20, 1978 Draft Environmental Impact Statement - SUMMERFIELD EAST, October 1978 The following changes or additions are recommended in subject document for the reasons indicated. 2. Page 15 - Amend first line to read " * ** mean Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) levels * * * ". Reason: Advise reader of meaning of "TSP ". 3. Page 16 - At end of second paragraph of section "Carbon monoxide" add: "The Valley Chamber of Commerce monitoring site is perhaps most relative to Summerfield East project." Reason: Without a map showing the location of sampling sites, there is no correlation between the text and the table on page 17. The relationship of air quality problems in downtown Spokane and the project site is not made readily apparent. 7. Page 32 - In paragraph c, add: "The drainage plan should be devised to permit collection and treatment before subsurface disposal as may be required by the forthcoming wastewater management plan resulting from the "208" Study ". Reason: Groundwater quality is impacted by the total of man's activities. Storm water runoff from developed areas contributes to the total pollution as well as subsurface disposal of domestic waste effluents. 4. Page 21 - In Section 3.3 "Floods ", clarify legal responsibility of Spokane County for the maintenance of the old canal for drainage purposes. Reason: The refurbishing and use of the canal by the County appears paramount in the drainage plan. 6. Page 31 - Second paragraph - Amend to read " ** *approximately 80,000 to 93,800 gallons of domestic wastewater per day, * * * ". Reason: See comment 1 above. 8. Page 39 - In section 7c, add: "Covenants for the plat could require individual lot exterior lighting to be limited to individual lot boundaries or not exceed light sources of greater than 40 watts." Reason: Provides a major control on nuisance glare. • • • • • • ..annual geometric mean Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) levels • not to exceed 75 micrograms per.... • • • The first sentence on page viii should read: There are three sources that may impact ground water quality: Approximately 80,000 to 93,800 gallons of domestic wastewater per day, storm water runoff and the use of chemicals (fertilizer, herbicides, etc.). "TSP" refered to on the fourth line on page 15 should read: The statement, "The Valley Chamber of Commerce monitoring site is perhaps most relative to the Summerfield East Project ", should be placed at the end of the second paragraph of section "Carbon Monoxide" found on page 16. In Section 3.3 "Floods" of the DEIS there is reference made to a now defunct irrigation canal along the north edge of the project. In its present state of repair, the canal is inadequate to handle peak spring runoff and as a result some washing occurs across Forker Road below the Miller house. The Spokane Land and Water Company constructed and maintained the canal. • The canal has since been vacated, with title reverting to adjacent pro- perty owners. The legal responsibility for the maintenance of the canal drainage purposes is legal question. The canal has been deeded to the adjacent property owners who have claimed sovereignty over the canal property, but for the past seven years Spokane County has used the canal for drainage. Spokane County Utility Department representatives have • indicated that the County does not maintain and does not have the re- sponsibility for maintenance of the canal. Please refer to comment 26 for the Spokane County Utility Department's discussion of Drainage. This typographical error is noted. • 92 The third sentence in the second paragraph on page 31 should read: It is estimated that the residents of the proposed project will generate approximately 80,000 to 93,800 gallons of domestic waste- water per day, which would be disposed of by the drainfields and ultimately percolated into the soil. The statement, "The drainage plan should be devised to permit collection and treatment before subsurface disposal as may be re•uired b the forthcomi wastewater mana•ement •lan resultin from the "208 Study ", should be added to paragraph 2 of section 3.8 C. on page 32. The statement "Covenants for the plat could require individual lot exterior lighting to be limited to individual lot boundaries or not exceed light sources of greater than 40 watts ", should be added to paragraph 1 of section 7 C. on page 39. 93 • -- SUMMERFIELD EAST November 20, 1978 Page 2 9. Page 63 - It is essential that status of the drainage system be clarified; if not resolved, flooding could adversely affect the use of septic tanks and drainfields in the plat. Reason: See also comment 4 above. 10. Page 69. Amend last paragraph to read " ** *contaminants associated with man's activities are reaching * * * ". Reason: Accuracy; septic tank, effluent is included in "man's activities ", but no evidence is available indicating a greater percentage of septic tank effluent reaches the ground water than from a community treatment facility with subsurface disposal. See discussion on pages 70 and 71. 11. Page 74 - In first paragraph the stated 86 acres and 266 lots is incon- sistent with earlier plat descriptions. See also paragraph 2 of calculations. Reason: See page 1, paragraph E. 12. Page 75 - For the personal pronoun "1" substitute the name of the author or alternatively on page 75 show author's name and signature. The report should also be dated. Reason: Assist reader in determining credibility of the report since no individual authors are named nor is source of report given. 13. Page 79 - In last paragraph, identify the plat map referenced, since the map on page 5 is labelled as "Site Plan ". Reason: There frequently are more than one plat map during planning stages of a project such, as this. 94 RECEIVED NOV 2 0 1978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT • • • • • • • The drainage area north of the plat has overflowed the irrigation canal and created flooding over Forker Road and along the boundary of the proposed project site during high runoff periods of the year. Because of this and because no storm water management plan for this basin is anticipated in the near future, an on -site storm drainage facility alternative was included in Appendix A on pages 73 - of the DEIS, to insure the safety of the proposed project (septic tanks) and adjacent area. The last paragraph on page 69 should read: The most recent "208 Study" findings strongly suggest that con- taminants associated with man's activities are reaching the ground water and that concentrations of these contaminants are generally highest around the periphery of the aquifer. The first paragraph of the "Storm Drainage Report Summerfield East" on page 74 should read: The proposed subdivision would plat 91 acres of cultivated farmland • into approximately 268 lots (typical lot size 10,000 square feet.) The "Storm Drainage Report Summerfield East" was prepared under supervision of Richard L. Mason, P. E. The last paragraph on page 79 should read: As shown on the plat map on file with the Spokane County Planning • Department as Preliminary Subdivision Number PE 1206 -78 and Zone Reclassification ZE 202 -78, there are a few things that can be done to help insure the safety of the proposed project site. 95 .. S1 ,. 2; y Z • O U Z � « 4r PROTF Dear Mr. Dayharsh: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REPLY TO ATTN OE: M/S 443 NOV 1 7 1978 Fred Dayharsh, Director Spokane County Planning Department N. 221 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Sincerely, 7 OAJ- 1.114,604,.1 kg_ Alexandra B. Smith, Chief Environmental Evaluation Branch REGION X 1200 SIXTH AVENUE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 96 R E CEI vE Q NUV PLANNINC DEPARTMENT We have completed our review of your draft environmental impact statement for Summerfield East, a residential development in Spokane, Washington and would like to submit the following comments for your consideration. Page 33 indicates that there is a water well 300 feet north of Wellesley Avenue; however the EIS text does not state the use (domestic or irrigation) of this water. The final EIS should indicate the use of the water and whether or not other nearby wells are used as a source of domestic water. If the Wellesley water is used as a source of domestic water, we believe that periodic water quality analysis should be performed to determine if surface runoff water and septic tank effluent from the surrounding homes are degrading the ground water. The final EIS should present a plan to determine if local ground water is being degraded after home construction has occurred and a mitigation plan should the above plan indicate that ground water quality is being adversely affected. The EIS's discussion of ground water quality presents ground water charac- teristics for several wells within a mile of the proposed development but does not present such characteristics for the Wellesley Avenue well whose quality is stated as "excellent." The final EIS should present the water quality characteristics of the Wellesley water as it should be representa- tive of the water under the proposed development. The characteristics should then be compared to the applicable drinking water quality standards. We appreciate the opportunity to review this draft environmental impact statement. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Dennis Ossenkop, of my staff, should you have questions or desire further information regarding our comments. We can be reached at (206) 442 -1285. • • • • The well, as indicated on the Water Service Location Map on page 33, has been capped and abandoned for 20 years. The water well closest to the development is owned by the Trentwood Irrigation District and is located on the northwest corner of Progress and Wellesley as referenced on page 32, and shown on page 40 of the DEIS. The well is not currently used year -round as demands can be met by the two other wells within the Trentwood Irrigation District. (The Trentwood - Mayhew well and the Trentwood- Progress well shown on page 27 of the DEIS.) This well, when in use, provides water both for irrigation and domestic purposes, and has not been known to be sampled. The Trentwood- Progress and Trentwood- Mayhew wells, however, have been extensively monitored and all are part of the same water system. The data included within the DEIS on these two Trentwood wells would be very indicative of the water quality at the Wellesley and Progress well and the ground water under the site. The Trentwood Irrigation District System is periodically monitored to determine water quality and its relation to applicable drinking water standards. The Kaiser East Gate well is used for domestic water and one "208" Irvin well is a test well (depth selective.) The "208" Study has conducted an extensive study to try to determine if ground water is affected by surface water runoff and septic tank effluent. In the Draft Summary Report of "208" Water Quality Results And Cause And Effect Relationship For Water Quality In The Spokane Aquifer it was concluded that "moisture from precipitation as well as irrigation, runoff, waste disposal and other sources percolates from the ground surface to the aquifer and carries with it salts and other constituents." The study also recommends that corrective or mitigative measures for runoff and percolation initiated to hold pol- lutant load to the aquifer at or below its present level to prevent future aquifer water quality deterioration. It is not known at this time what mitigative plan would be utilized. It is known that permits will have to be obtained and appropriate mitigative plans will have to be approved by the agencies which release these permits. The proposal does offer flexibility for a number of waste water, and runoff disposal options which are discussed in the DEIS. • • 97 • STATE OF WASHINGTON Dixy Lee Ray Gouernor Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Director Spokane County Planning Department N. 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 RSN:tml WPA /WBH cc: W. R. Horning H. B. Ashford R. Albert Environmental Section DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION KF -01 Highway Administration Building, Olympia, Washington 98504 206/7516005 November 22, 1978 Spokane County Summerfield East Draft Environmental Impact Statement Dear Mr. Dayharsh: We have reviewed the subject document and have the following comments: We assume that the 2,100 plus trips generated daily by the development will be routed on SR 290. At present it appears that the intersections of SR 290 and Pines Road and Argonne Road will adequately handle the traffic. However, closer to the city the intersections are almost to capacity, therefore a slight increase in traffic volume will impact these intersections. Also, the construction of the Hamilton Street Bridge will attract an additional traffic load to SR 290. With these facts in mind, we feel the statement on page 51 about all roads having ample capacity is misleading and should be corrected to address impacts to specific intersections. If you have any questions about these comments, please call me at 753 -3811. Sincerely, ROBERT S. NIELSEN Assistant Secretary Public Transportation and Planning 98 By: IM. P. ALBOHN Environmental Planner Z'T 3 • • As previously stated on page 51 of the DEIS, "the proposal will add several hundred trips per day to Wellesley Avenue, Sullivan Road, Pines Road, Trent Avenue, I -90." The assumption that 2,100 plus one -way vehicle trips generated daily by the development will be routed on SR -290 Trent Avenue for destinations closer to the city, does not take into consideration the following data: (a) The Spokane Industrial Park, the area's largest manufacturing facility which encompasses 570 acres for approximately 75 employees, is located one mile southeast of the site. • (b) The Board of County Commissioners for Spokane County have recently approved the zoning for a site located approximately six miles southeast of the residential development in question. This planned community will generate in the neighborhood of 10,000 jobs when completed and for its employment base, it includes a 21 -acre shopping center and a 420 -acre industrial trade center. (c) Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation has a fabricating plant which employees 2,678 workers and is located one mile south of the proposed residential development. (d) The Spokane County Planning Commission has recently approved • zoning for an 850,000 square foot Regional Shopping Center proposed for a site located three miles southeast of the residential development in question. (e) The travel time from the site to the Spokane central business district by auto, according to the Spokane Metropolitan Area • Transportation Study, is 16 to 20 minutes. The Study, however, identifies I -90 as the fastest route to the city from Pines Road (SR -27) when compared to Trent Avenue (SR -290). Of the 2,100 plus one -way vehicle trips generated daily by the development, it is safe to assume that a majority of the traffic • routed closer to the city will utilize 1 -90 via Sullivan Road and Pines Road, thus increasing the traffic volumes at the Sullivan Road and Trent Avenue and the Pines Road and Trent Avenue intersections. • • According to the representative of the Washington State Department of Transportation, both of the above mentioned . intersections have a • volume to capacity ratio of less than .50, which will allow for anticipated increases. It is also safe to assume that with a substantial employment and service base within the vicinity of the proposed development as described above, a substantial percentage of the vehicle trips • generated daily by the development will be for destinations in the area. 99 • AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY November 30, 1978 • Fred Dayharsh North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 'PEL Dear Mr. Dayharsh: After reviewing the draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Summerfield East Development, we wish to clarify two items. First, on Page 18 it is stated "all roads should be paved ". Will be paved is more proper as the County requires paving on all new plats. Second, the continuing development in that area may be expected to cause CO problems along Sullivan Road. We would like the proponent to speak to this matter. RECEIVED loo NOV 3 0 1978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ADDRESS REPLY TO: SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY WEST 1101 COLLEGE, ROOM 234 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this draft Environmental Impact Statement. Sincerely, sate °V • Bill Murphy Air Quality Engineer L • • • • • • • • • • • The second paragraph of 2.1 C on page 18 should read: To reduce motor vehicle related emissions, all roads will be paved, and the Federal Automobile Emission Control Standards should be implemented. It is reasonable to assume that owners of undeveloped properities to the north, east and west of the site will continue to experience pressure for the residential development of their properties. With the increase in residential development in this area, it is safe to assume that several thousand trips per day will be added to Sullivan Road; thus increasing the CO levels. (Note Comment No. 17 regarding vehicle trips generated by the development.) Major commercial and industrial developments proposed for the I -90 /Sullivan Road vicinity however, will have a far greater impact on Sullivan Road in terms of traffic and air quality as compared to the projected residential growth discussed above. Without specifics as to the nature of future development in the area, it is impossible to quantify future ambient air - quality problems along Sullivan Road. 101 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE Room 360 U.S. Courthouse, Spokane, Washington 99201 Fred Dayharsh, Director Spokane County Planning Department N. 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Mr. Dayharsh: Sincerely, Galen S. Bridge State Conservationist 102 R ECEIVED CEO 5 1978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT November 30, 1978 We have reviewed the draft environmental impact statement for the proposed Summerfield East development and have the following comments. It is the policy of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Soil Conservation Service to promote the retention of prime agricultural lands as one way to insure an adequate food supply for future generations. We, therefore, are concerned that the statement should recognize this relationship (in the section under short -term versus long -term productivity) in the light of the overall incremental loss of prime soils in the County due to all similar development proposals. If this is not done, there is no way for the average reader to properly evaluate the full consequence of urban development as intended under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969: 0 • • • • • • • • • The physical limitations of the soil, combined with economical considerations discussed above, have to be considered when analyzing prime agricultural farmland. Changing markets require periodic updates in areas considered prime agricultural farmland. • As discussed on page 65 under The Relationship Between Local Short -Term of Man's Environment and the Maintenance and Enhancement of Long -Term Productivity, "Development of the 91 -acre site into a 268 -lot residential community will have an impact on the long term productivity of the property in terms of its present agricultural use. The property plays a small role in the agricultural economy of the • region and therefore the loss of the current use will have a slight effect on agricultural productivity in the Spokane area. The reduction of agricultural land, (marginal productivity), considered in light of the increasing demand for moderate priced housing in the Spokane area, may be considered an enhancement of the long -term productivity of the area." • • • • The DEIS on page 35 notes the 91 -acre site has been designated as prime farmland according to the Soil Conservation Services. For this area to be designated as prime farmland, it not only has to have the soil quality, growing season and moisture supply needed to meet the definition; but it must produce economically sustained high yields of crops when treated and managed according to modern farm methods. The site has been designated prime agricultural land, but the soil has the following limitations: (a) fertility is classified as medium; (b) the soil is excessively drained, with low water holding capacity; (c) gravel and cobble is hard on tillage and harvesting equipment, and provides a poor seed bed. This past summer, 70 acres of the site was cultivated in dryland barley with a yield of approximately one ton per acre; not an economically high yield. 103 STATE OF WASHINGTON Dixy Lee Ray Gouernor DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Olympia, Washington 98504 Pv -11 206/753'2800 Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Director Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 December 4, 1978 Dear Mr. Dayharsh: Thank you for providing us with review copies of your draft environ- mental impact statement for "Summerfield East, Planned Residential Development." Your well written impact statement was reviewed by Department of Ecology staff, both here in Olympia and in our Eastern Regional Office in Spokane. We wish to offer the following comments for your consideration prior to preparation of the final EIS: 1.) The Summary of the Contents of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (page viii) should be updated to contain, at a mini- mum, the Draft Summary Report of '208' Water Quality Results and Cause Effect Relationships for Water Quality in the Spokane Aquifer conclusion, ".... that moisture from precipitation as well as irrigation, runoff, waste disposal and other sources percolates from the ground surface to the aquifer and carries with it salts and other constituents." Additionally, it should be noted that one of the recommendations of this report is quoted as follows: "Urbanization has been shown to lead to water quality deterioration and possibly is creating a public health risk at current levels of development (bacteriological, heavy metals). Land use and control or mitigating measures to offset water quality changes which might be prompted by urban land uses should be initiated. In other words, further land development should be curtailed or corrective or mitigative measures for runoff and percolation initiated to hold pollutant load to the aquifer at or below its present level to prevent future aquifer water quality deterioration." 2.) We were pleased to note that this proposal provides for both dry sewers and a location for any future on -site treatment facility. The flexibility of this arrangement to meet future needs and /or circumstances is an excellent planning example. An additional aspect to this effort which should be considered would be the expansion of dry sewers to provide pipe not only to the curb but also require builders to dry sewer into the homes. This situation would allow minimal costs to homeowners if hookup to a central sewer system becomes possible or if an on -site plant is required. • This comment is noted. For further discussion, please refer to comment 23. This comment is noted. • • ioS • Mr. Dayharsh December 4, 1978 Page Two • Should you have questions, please contact Mr. Larry Peterson of • our Spokane Office (456- 2926). PRH:me 106 Yours very trul eter R. Raskin Environmental Review Section DEC 13 R EC VE ls %JINNI GNE�R ENT • • • •, •t MEMORANDUM December 5, 1978 TO: Fred Dayharsh, Planning Director FROM: Ray Card, '208' Study Project Manager e / SUBJECT: Environmental Impact Statement, Summerfield East 107 The '208' draft "Cause and Effect" report written by Dr. Larry Esvelt was released for public use shortly before this draft EIS was written. Dr. Esvelt has made some interesting conclusions regarding mans activities on the land surface and its effects on water quality. I would like to see the data contained in that report included in the final EIS for Summerfield East. R ECEIVED O [ C 1978 SPOKANE COUNT( PLANNING DEPARTMENT • • • • • The "208" draft "Cause and Effect" report data was included within the DEIS of the Summerfield proposal. The interpretation of this data and conclusions and recommendations of this report were not available at the time of publication of the DEIS. Although the report is a draft, and subject to change, and also has not been adopted by the county; the conclusions most appropriate to Summerfield in this report were: (1) "There are substantial differences in water quality between peripheral sampling sites (along the edge of the aquifer and the center or main stem). It is concluded that the slower moving water along the periphery accumulates constituents percolating from the overlying land and contained in runoff from adjacent hillside areas." (2) "There is an increase in the salt concentration of the aquifer from the State Line where it flows into Washington to outlet springs along the Spokane River and along the Little Spokane River. It is concluded that these salts are contributed from overlying land use activities." (3) There is consistent variation of water quality with depth below the aquifer surface at all but two depth selective sampling • points monitored during this study. Highest concentrations of constituents occur near the surface. It is concluded that moisture from precipitation, as well as irrigation, runoff, waste disposal and other sources, percolate from the ground surface to the aquifer and carries with it salts and other constituents." • (4) "Bacteriological results indicate a potential risk of pathogenic organism transmission from surface applied waste waters to the aquifer. Further development and population growth over the aquifer or on areas directly tributary to the aquifer could increase public health risks." • Recommendations of the report were made for consideration during development of a water quality management plan for the Spokane - Rathdrum aquifer in Spokane County, Washington. The recommendation most appropriate here is: .... "Land use and control or mitigating measures to offset water quality changes which might be prompted by urban land uses should be initiated. In other words, further land • development should be curtailed or corrective or mitigative measures for runoff and percolation initiated to hold pollutant load to the aquifer at or below its present level to prevent future aquifer water quality deterioration." • 108 • It is not known at this time what corrective or mitigative measures may or may not be required in the future. It is known, however, that permits will be required and waste water and runoff disposal will have to be mitigated to the satisfaction of the agencies releasing such permits or approving such plans. The proposed project does offer flexibility in methods of mitigation of waste water disposal in the future. (Reference page 32 of the DEIS.) 109 • mr Dixy Lee Ray Governor December 5, 1978 Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Director Spokane County Planning Department N. 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Mr. Dayharsh: Sincerely, Gordon Sandiso Director cc: DOE GAME STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES 115 General Adminulrarxn Buddurg, Olymp.a, Washington 98504 Draft Environmental Impact Statement Summerfield East Spokane County WRIA T -55 110 206/753 6000 We have reviewed the above described statement, and offer the following comment. Important foodfish resources in the area is limited to planted juvenile salmon in Roosevelt Lake. Measures to reduce impurities entering the Spokane River and adherence to state water quality standards are our primary concerns. We note mitigative measures discussed on p. 22 and feel that proper containment of surface runoff either on -site or near site would help aleviate downstream impacts and also guard water quality too. 1s18 SPOKANE COUNTY P:,•,n'I,NG DEPARTMENT • • • • • Thank you for seeking our comments. • • • R ECEIVED • • • This comment is noted. 111 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Fred Davharsh. Dir tot�f Planning Dobratz y�•r ` Draft Environmenral.Iaitarr Statement Summerfield East Date Dec. 5, 1978 The following comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement for Summerfield East are submitted by the Utilities Department for your review. Additional information on Transportation /Circulation and Water will be submitted separately. Water: Two different estimates are included in the draft EIS as to the peak summer time flow on water consumption. On pages 34 and Viii appear "2,000 gallons per lot" and /or "532,000 gallons per day ", but on pages 26 and 61 these figures are "2,500 gallons per lot" and /or "665,000 gallons per day ". Both seem high for consumption per lot based on 3.5 persons and small lot sizes (10,000 S.F.) Drainage: The existing Forker Road basin drainage problem may involve litigation prior to it's resolution due to the presence of the inadequate canal. Because of this and because no storm water management plan for this basin is anticipated to be forthcoming soon, storm drainage facilities are to be included that will insure the safety of the proposed project and adjacent areas. Storm drainage facilities similar to those described in the ADDENDUM TO SUMMERFIELD DRAINAGE REPORT in APPENDIX A appear to be adequate. 112 OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEEk • Spokane County, Washington • • • • • • • • • • • Representatives of Trentwood Irrigation have indicated that the average homesite will demand 40,000 cubic feet of water per year (299,240 gllons per year or 819 gallons per day over a 365 day time period). The Engineers for Trentwood Irrigation District have requested a water system designed to supply a maximum of 2,500 gallons per day per homesite, for maximum summertime demand. The water consumption estimates found on pages 34 and viii should read: "2,500 gallons per lot" and /or "665,000 gallons per day." This comment is noted. • 113 TO: Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Director Planning Department FROM: Gary Kennaly, Planning & Traffic Division Enginee Spokane County Engineer's Office SUBJECT: Draft EIS Review of Summerfield East We have completed our review and analysis of the Draft EIS and offer the following comments for your consideration. Section 4. Transportation /Circulation Co rrz. :c or COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER S1• 10 MAN 'WAS z ¶W2()1 December 5, 1978 1. Trent Avenue should be identified as SR 290 because it is a State Highway and is under the jurisdiction of the State Department of Transportation -- not the County Road Department. 2. In addition to the arterials mentioned in the Draft, Forker Road and Progress Road are designated arterials, adjacent to and pro- viding direct access to the proposed development but not mentioned in this portion of the Draft. 3. Due to operational and geometric characteristics of Forker Road, additional right of way dedication and construction of left turn facilities may be required to mitigate possible traffic safety hazards from traffic entering this proposed development from Forker Road. 4. Same statement as #3 only referring to Progress Road. 5. Same statement as #3 only referring to Wellesley Road. 6. No mention as to impacts or provisions for pedestrian and /or biker facilities on roads proposed in the plat. Sidewalks on neigh- borhood collector arterials are required and will partially address pedestrian facilities. To date the neighborhood collector arterials contained in this plat proposal have not been designated. 114 • • • • • • • This comment is noted. This comment is noted. This comment is noted. This comment is noted. This comment is noted. Pedestrian facilities (sidewalks) are mentioned as a measure to mitigate adverse impacts under 4.6 Traffic Hazards on page 52 of the DEIS. Provisions for bikepaths could also mitigate potential traffic hazards within the plat. 115 r ge 2 Fred Dayharsh Draft EIS Review of Summerfield East 7. Pedestrian and /or biker facilities were not addressed for existing arterials of Fotker Road, Progress Road and Wellesley Avenue which are all adjacent to the proposed development and which does pro- vide access to students traveling to the elementary, Junior and high schools in the immediate vicinity of the proposal. 116 • Pedestrian and /or bike facilities for the arterials of Forker Road, Progress Road and Wellesley Avenue intended to provide access to students in the immediate vicinity of the proposal have not been proposed by the project sponsor, but should be included as measures to mitigte adverse impacts under 4.6 Traffic Hazards. 117 PLAT NAHE , ,ea- (-;t J S'-5 l N0,67 TOTAL AREA BLOCK 1 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 3 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 5 BLOCK 6 BLACK 7 BLOCK 8 BLOCK 9 BLOCK 10 c ¥7 2. 39 7 3. 3 97 /_aor Lots per acre area in streets 5 4 Z acres. NO LOTS NO LOTS No LOTS NO LOTS NO LOTS NO LOTS NO LOTS NO LOTS NO LOTS NO LOTS NO LOTS as l4 3 Z g. 095 Gross 3,73/ Net E 12720 NORA AVE SPOKANE WA SH 99216 922 1300 (ED BY: JWS 03/07/79 1---- LATITUDES ------ BLCK LOT BEARING DISTANCE NOR T H S 0 li T H 2 9 CL N 0 0 OE 595.000 595.000 0.0 2 CL S 89 59 60W 664.700 0.000 2 CL N 66 29 58E 664.700 265.054 609.567 -CURVE: DELTA = 23 30 2 RADIUS = 664.700 LENGTH - 272.635 TANGENT - 2 CL S 89 56 40E 136.040 0.132 136.040 2 CL S 36 2 26E 27.225 22.014 16.018 2 CL .S 0 3 20W 123.000 123.000 2 CI. S 89 56 'FOE 375,090 0.364 375.090 2 CL S 0 25 19''v 560.010 559.995 2 CL N 89 56 40i 342,670 0.332 3 2 CI S 0 3 20W 133.000 133.000 __ _ __, 2 CL S 6 17 44W 22.130 21.997 2 CL N 89 56 40W 122.550 0.119 1 SL N 89 56 40t 82.990 0.080 S1,', ' 'N. 0 - 3 20E • 20.000 20.000 0.019 ', • - 2 . 2...SL0, .N 90.' 0 . OW • ,' , 20.000 .. • : 0.000. '1-CURVE: DELTA = , .89' 56 '40 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = ' 31.397 TANGENT ..= 2 SL N 0 0 OW 215.000 215.000 2 SL S 90 0 OE 20.000 0.000 20.000 2 SL N 0 3 20E 20.000 20.000 0.019 , . - :. .' + CORVE : 0 0 ELTA'' - '0' 90 ',..3 20 RADIUS = 2 LENGTH = 31.435 , TANGENT = - ,•.:H2,-•::-- . -SL.: - S , S9056 40E 239.000 : . '' 0..232 .239 '. . 2 SL S 0 20W 20.000 ' 20.000 . 2 st, N 5 4 54 16E 20.000 11.499 • 16.364 +CURVE: DELTA • 54 50 50 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 19.145 TANGENT = 2 SL N 54 54 10E 46.000 26.448 37.636 - • ' . 0 ... 0 . ;)6 2 7 SL N 54 4 01,4 4 .. 0 ° -CURVE DELTA 239 41 40 RADIUS - 46 . 00::1 - NGTH = 232.582 TANGENT = - 2 ' '5L N 54 47 30W ' '20.0 06 11.531 2 SL 5 0 3 20W 20.000 20.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 54 50 50 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 19.145 TANGENT 2 SL N 89 56 40W 239.070 0.232 2 2 .- Si '' N 0 3 20E ' 20.000 - 20.000 0.019 2 . . SL N 90.. 0 0w. . 20.000. 0.000 4- CURVE: DELTA = 89 56 40 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 31.397 TANGENT = 2 SL N 0 0 OW 204.000 204.000. 2 SL S 90 0 OE 20.000 0.000 20.000 2 SL N 0 3 20E 20.000 20.000 0.019 +CURVE: DELTA = 90 3 20 RADIUS = 20.000. LENGTH = 31.435 TANGENT - 90 1206 PLAT BORY N 0 5 38W PLAT BUY N 62 23 41E PLAT BDRY N 40 31 59E PLAT BORY N 65 56 49E PLAT BORY S 46 13 24E PLAT BORY S 90 0 OE PLAT 3DRY N 79 35 56E PLAT BDRY S 5639 30E PLAT BORY N 74 28 6E PLAT BDRY S 13 55 30E PLAT 3DRY S 89 56 40E PLAT 3DRY S 0 3 20W PLAT BDRY S 36 2 26E PLAT BDRY S 0 3 20W PLAT BDRY S 89 56 40E PLAT BORY S 0 25 1914 PLAT 3DRY N 89 56 40W PLAT BORY S 0 3 20W PLAT BCRY S 6 17 44W PLAT BDRY S 0 3 20W PLAT BORY N 89 56 40W PLAT BUY N 0 0 OE PLAT 3DRY N 90 0 OW PLAT BDRY S 0 0 OW PLAT BDRY S 89 52 OW 1121.630 192.970 48.010 128.000 114.310 469.100 133.390 63.630 128.000 75.190 36.430 123.000 5 4.45 0 123.000 375.090 560.010 342.670 1 CI. S 0 3 20IA 173.000 133.000 44.260 143,000 274.980 903.420 700.000 903.89d 311.100 1 CL N 0 0 OE 195.000 195.000 0.0 1 CL S 89 56 40E 122.550 0.119 122.550 1 CL 3 6 17 44W 22.130 21.997 CL N 89 56 40W 119.950 0.116 1 1 SL N 89 56 40W 78.000 0.076 1 SL N 0 3 2()E 20.000 20.000 0.019 1 SL N 90 0 OW 20.000 0.000 CURVE: DELTA = 89 56 40 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 31.397 TANGENT = 1 SL N 0 0 OW 103.000 103.000 2 1 SL S 90 0 OE 20.060 - 0.000 20.000 1 SL N 0 3 20E 20.000 20,000 0.019 +CURVE: DELTA = 90 3 20 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 31.435 TANGENT 1 SL S 89 56 40E 78.100 0.076 78.100 1 Si S 0 3 20W 143.000 143.000 2 --------'--"- 143.076 143.076 98.139 AREA = 13849. SQ FT ( 0.32 860.506 860.501 1136.715 .11 AREA = 301115. SQ FT ( 6.91 2 SL 2 SL 2 SL +CURVE: DELTA = 2 Si S 89 56 40E 5 0 3 20W N 54 54 10E 54 50 50 N 54 54 10E 2 SL N 54 47 30W -CURVE: DELTA = 289 41 40 RADIUS = 46.00 N 54 47 30W 20.000 s 0 3 20W 54 50 50 N 89 56 40W 2 SL 2 SL +CURVE: DELTA = 2 St. 2 SL S 0 3 20W 133.,0-C)0 3 CL N 0 5 38W 965.780 965.779 5 CL N 0 5 38W 251.350 251.350 5 CL N 62 23 41E 192.970 89.418 5 CL N 40 31 59E 23.840 18.119 5 CL N 64 1 59E 310.510 135.958 5 CL S 45 29 19W 310.510 -CURVE: DELTA = 18 32 40 RADIUS = 310.510 5 CL S 44 30 41E 295.630 5 CL S 89 54 22W 295.630 -CURVE: DELTA = 45 34 57 RADITJS = 295.630 5 CL 5 0 5 33E 65.600 1121.628 89.418 36.489 31.201 52.171 116.886 24.082 131.198 34.973 53.157 34.275 123.326 72.980 18.095 0.035 --- 36.430 123.000 44.028 32.036 123.000 0.364 375.090 559.995 0.332 133.000 43.993 143.000 0.267 2 903.420 0.0 0.000 eiCI 0.724 2262.082 2262.06'8 1640.057 16 AREA = 1121113. SQ FT I 25.74 195.116 195.115 122.550 1 AREA = 23436. SQ FT ( 0.54 239.000 0.232 239.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 11.499 16.364 RAC)I1 = 20.000 LENGTH = 19.145 TANGENT = 46,000 26.448 37.636 46.000 26.521 0 LENGTH = 11.531 173.000 20.000 20.000 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 19.145 TANGENT = 239.300 0.232 2 0 2 2 SL N 0 3 20E 20.000 20.000 0.019 2 SL S 88 32 37W 20.000 0.508 +CURVE: DELTA = 88 29 17 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 30.888 TANGENT = 2 SL 5 88 32 37W 686.700 17.453 6 2 SL N 71 36 22E 686.700 216.687 -CUR1/F: t.TA = 16 56 15 RADIUS = 686.700 LENGTH = 202.999 2 SL N 71 3c) 22F 20.000 6.311 2 SL N 0 3 20E 20,000 20.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 108 26 58 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 37.856 2 SL S 89 56 40E 91.010 0.088 2 SL 5 0 3 20W 123.000 2 St. S 89 56 40E 375.090 2 SL S 0 25 191 560.016 --- 2 SL N 89 56 40W 342.670 0.332 79,085 82.537 0.000 469.100 232.582 TANGENT 123.000 0.364 55 133.000 4 CL N89 54 22E 4 CL S 0 5 38E 900.180 900.179 4 CL S 89 52 OW 155.550 0.362 217.633 LENGTH = 100.500 210.817 --- DEPARTURES EAST W 171.002 651.616 TANGENT 13.978 0.019 TANGENT 91.010 375.090 = 1 6 3 914.875 914.872 1762.810 17 AREA = 243959. SQ FT ( 5.60 3 CL N 89 54 22E 295.630 0.484 295.630 3 CL N 44 30 41W 295.630 210.817 2 +CURVE: DELTA = 45 •34 57 TIADIUS = 295.630 LENGTH = 235.193 TANGENT = 1 3 CL N 45 29 19E 310.510 217.683 221.428 3 CL S 0 0 OE 310.510 310.510 - - - -CtiRVE: DELTA = 45 29 19 RADIUS = 310.510 LENGTH = 246.522 TANGENT = 3 CL 5 90 0 OE 324.850 0.000 324.850 3 CL N 0 0 OE 633.860 633.860 0.0 3 CL S 25 47 48E 633.860 570.692 275.842 -C(JRVE: CELTA = 25 47 48 RADIUS 633.860 LENGTH = 285.387 TANGENT = 1 3 CL N 64 12 12E 514.010 223.686 462.786 3 CL S 60 30 OW 514.010 253.111 4 -CURVE: DELTA .r- 3 42 12 RADIUS = 514.010 LENGTH = 33.223 TANGENT = 3 CL S 60 30 OW 664.700 327.314 5 3 C L N 90 0 OE 664.700 0.000 664.700 +CURVP: DELTA = 29 30 0 RADIUS = 664.700 LENGTH = 342.235 TANGENT 0 = 1 3 CL S 0 0 OE 790.000 790.000 0.0 3 CL N 89 56 403 155.000 0.150 1 3 CL N 0 0 OE 933.420 933.420 0.0 2 _ 2 2 __ ....2 3 CL N 90 0 OW 700.000 0.000 7 3 GI 5 0 0 OE 933.890 933.890 0.0 3 CL S 89 52 OW 155.500 0.362 1 3185.880 3185.879 2245.236 22 AREA = 451465. SQ FT ( 10.36 3 SL S 89 52 OW 113.530 0.264 1 3 St_ N 0 7 60W 20.000 20.000 3 SL S 89 54 22W 20.000 0,033 +C-IJRVE: DELTA = 90 2 22 RADIUS 20.000 LENGTH = 31.430 TANGENT = 3 SL N 0 5 386 915.750 915.749 3 SL N 89 54 22E 273.630 0.448 273.630 3 SL N 53 22 55W 273.630 163.214 2 +CURVE: DELTA = 36 42 43 RADIUS = 273.630 LENGTH = 175.327 TANGENT = 3 SL S 53 22 55E 20.000 11.930 16.05 -- 3 SL N 38 8 56E 20.0()0 15.728 12.354 +CUFZ.VE: DELTA = 91 31 51 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 31.950 TANGEI\IT 3 SL N 38 8 56E 332.510 261.489 205.394 3 S 0 0 OE 332.510 332.510 0.0 -CURVE: DELTA = 38 8 56 RAt)IUS = 332.510 LENGTH = 221.393 TANGENT = 1 90 0 OE 324.850 0.000 324.850 3 SL N 0 0 OE 655.860 655.860 0.0 3 St. S 22 21 27E 655.860 606.558 249.479 ,,_ _ 2_22_ -CURVE: DELTA = 22 21 27 • RADIUS = 655.860 LENGTH = 255.924 TANGENT = 1, 3 SL S 22 21 27E 20.000 18.497 7.608 3 SL N 60 56 56E 20.000 9.712 +CURVE: DELTA = 83 18 23 RADIUS --= - 20.060 LENGTH = 29.079 TANGENT = 5 3 SL S 60 56 56W 642.700 312.089 3 SL N 90 0 OE 642.700 0.000 642.700 1-CURVE: CELTA = 29 3 4 RADIUS = 642.700 LENGTH = 325.873 TANGENT = 1( 3 Si S 0 0 OE 739.960 739.960 0.0 3 SL N 89 59 60 20.000 0.000 3 SL S 0 3 20W 20.000 20.000 -CURVE: DELTA = 90 3 20 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 31.435 TANGENT = 3 St. N 89 56 40W 112.980 0.110 1 3 SL N 0 0 OE 903.420 903.420 0.0 3 SL S 89 59 600 700.000 0.000 7( 3 SL S 0 0 OE 903.890 903.890 0.0945 2 3 2945.730 1749,550 174 7 AR 0 - EA 373195. SQ FT ( 8.57 C N 0 5 38W 900.280 900.279 155.550 0.255 155.550 1.475 2 0222 ..22 22 00.541 157.025 1.! AREA = 140031. SQ FT ( 3.21 4 SL N 0 5 38W 848.280 848.279 4 SL P4 89 54 22E 113.550 0.186 113.550 4 SL S 0 5 38E 20.000 20.000 0.033 RADIUS = 20.000 0.033 LENGT1-1 = 31.416 TANGENT = ,. 4 SL N 89 54 22E 20.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 90 0 0 20.000 4 SL S 0 5 38E 808.200 808.199 1.324 4 SL S 89 54 22W 20.000 0.033 4 SL S 0 8 OE 20.000 20.000 0.047 CURVE: DELTA = 89 57 38 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 31.402 TANGENT .=-- ] 4 SL S 89 52 OW 113.560 0.264 1., 848.498 848.496 134.954, AREA = 113110; SQ FT ( 2.60 171.66i 15.493 ?-79.163 TANGENT 207.252 0.484 2 22 LENGTH = 235.193 TANGENT = 65.600 0.107 22 ( tr , Cr N00 0 05' 38" W 30.00 -� Chord Bearing C 1 S 35 ° 14'21" E C 2 S 56°45' 04" E C 3 S 47 °28'44" E C 4 N 22°41' 51" E C 5 N 44°54' 22" E C 6 N 00° 20' 10" E C 7 S 82°23' 00" W C 8 S 45°06' 49" E C 9 N 44°53' 11" E C 10 N 45°05' 38" W tr) tk LOT 4,- 0 7, BLOCK 3 I' Wide Strip NOTE: All Lots ore Subject to 5' Wide Drainage Easements along each side of o// /nterior Lot Lines end along o// Rear Lot Lines. See Dedication. m N co SW Corner Section 35-26-44 100.06 131.66 227.72 229.04 28.28 24.84 28.66 28.29 28.27 28.28 Fnd. 5/8" Rebor per R.O.S., Book 18 of Surveys, page 5 I= (n /0,85/ Iii, N89 °54' 22 "EI o 133.55 m I oN z 5 a I N 0 z& 00,85/ a -a o ' co N89 °54' 22 "EI Y 133.55 I '1. O 6 3 I N • CO J /0,85/ m N89 °54' 22 "E • GP 0 0 LOT 4, BLOCK 4 0p 1' Wide Strip ---+ 0,2 ., IN.. \ °• '1 °�� \6o) N. I 1/0 °, 6.35 16,6430 (v O /V 68° k o`'�o,°i W rs 1 ' 3 >„ r� / o � • W 9 ii./ .§.. /e. 0 F- I 2 /3,4230 oQ� N81°20, � I g D�: 3 3m m , 0 /3 , 694 0 � o I �h m 23.60 1 113.55 C m WABASH N89°54' 22" E 155.55 AVENUE 113.55 IN 13,0300 I m . t` N89 °54' 22 "E 133.55 N 2 IN 10,85/ 0' I N89°54' 221E1 133.55 m 3 • /0,85/ 0 .,31 W N89 °54' 22 "E 0 133.55 4 133.55 10,85/ ¢t N89 °54' 22 "EI 133.55 8 /0,85/ Sb 8 N89 °54' 22 "EI 133.55 133.55 T T Q /. A / /0)6)x' e I- / V i YY , t.i L. Spokane County Engineer's Corner # 3543 Fnd. 3/4" I.P. and three R.P.s of Record Tk. in T. Pole, N 50 E, 38.77' Tk. in P. Pole, S 50 W, 37.20' (Meas. 37.29') "x" on face of Standpipe, S 40 E, 46.67' Chord Delta 018 ° 32'40" 024 043 01' 26" 045 090 °00'00" 076 46' 42" 091 °31'51" 090 02' 22" 089 57' 38" 090 00' 00" 0 16' N I - N 9 10,851 dJ I 0 N 69° 54' 22" E1 -4 CURVE INFORMATION 22' 2 cc Z m 0 0 0' 5 ° 2 IN 89°54' 22" E 1 Lc) r 0' 3 ao m in 0 0 O z ml 0 22 134.91 I c .1 4 /o, 787 0 QIW IN 89 °54' 22 "E l 134.78 0 . 1 o 0 IJ CO ats 2 /1,74/ 0 5 10,777 0 IN89 °54' 22 "E I 134.65 Q o v .€ 6 3 m I Q /O, 767 ¢i }- IN89 °54' 22 "E 134.51 813 7 n11 //, 428th m 134.38 03 I N 89 °54' 22 "E �- -10.00 10.00 I 8 I CO //, 0 IN89 °54' 22 "E i 134.09 /0, 7222 133.96 oI I N 69° 54' 22" E II 133.83 O i o 12 O l /O70/ 0 22' 22' C0 N89 °54' 22 "E 133.70 Inland Pacific Engineering Company South 25 Altamont Spokane, Washington 509 535 -1410 • 99202 UNPLAT 135.04 3 ° /O, 798 N89 °54' 22 "E N 89° 54' 22" E 0 134.36 • oI o u) 134.22 �I 9 0I 10,732 1 0 CO N 89° 54' 22" E IN 89 °54' 22 "E O 0 0 0 O 0 2 l0, 94ol) t ) � 0 0 m 0 0 aD 0 O O m 0 0 m . 0) Utiity Easement � ©l' LOT 3, BLOCK 4 O 1 Wide Strip �O LO SOOT 6,0 D O T.P.O.B. 10 I 13 /3273 5 1 r /l, 946 di O io� 113.56 i cy � 113.53 OT S89 °5' 0 W 811 10 1983.19 , ;.. 155.55 4,- 155.50 -. ---- BASIS OF BEARINGS WELLESLEY 2644.24 N89 °52' 00 "E Radius Arc Tangent 310.51 100.50 50.69 310.51 132.66 67.36 310.51 233.16 122.39 295.63 235.20 124.22 20.00 31.42 20.00 20.00 26.80 15.85 20.00 31.95 20.54 20.00 31.43 20.01 20.00 31.40 19.99 20.00 31.42 20.00 A6' Wide Drainage a fn Fnd. 5/8" Rebor per R.O.S., Book 18 of Surveys, page 5, at NW Corner of Trentwood Elementary School Site OT 14, BLOCK 2 10' Wide Walkway /,344 tii AVENUE UNPLATTE° NOTE: The Basis of Bearings for this map is the bearing of S.89 ° 52'00 "W. on the South line of the SW1 /4 of Section 35, as shown on the final plat of SWAN ACRES REPLAT NO. 1 350.00 • Fnd. Monuments (5/8" rebar per R.O.S., Book 18 of Surveys, page 5; unless otherwise noted) O Set 1/2" rebar w /yellow plastic cap "MOORE 18091" at angle points in bdry O Set 1/2" rebar w /yellow plastic cap "MOORE 18091" as centerline monuments after installation of improvements T 1/2" "MOORE 18091" at / a l plastic cap lllotcorners S I/4 Corner Section 35 -26 -44 Spokane County Engineer's Corner # 3544 Fnd. 2" Pipe w/ Wire in Mon. Case Fits three R.P.s of Record Tk. in T. Pole, S 40 E, 41.98'(Meas. 42.08') "x" on Curb, N 45 E, 55.60' "x" on Curb, N 40 W, 60.32' RADIAL BEARINGS 1 i'l 64°01'59" E 2 N 45 °29'19" E 3 N 21 °00'33" E 4 S 44 °30'41" E 5 N 38°08'56" E 6 S 53 °22'55" E 7 N 51 °56'49" E 8 S 51 °16'29" E N Scale: I" = 100' LEGEND FINAL PLAT OF SUMMERFIELD EAST BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 35, T26 N., R. 44 E. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON JANUARY 1984 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that TUPPER, INC., a Washington corporation; and BRUCE B. BUTLER and JUDITH A. BUTLER, husband and wife; and MERCEDES JESKE, a married woman dealing in her separate property; and OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, a national banking association, as Trustee for Faye S. Elliott, have caused to be platted into Lots, Blocks, and Streets the land shown hereon to be known as SUMMERFIELD EAST, said land being part of the SW1 /4 of Section 35, T.26 N., R.44 E.W.M., County of Spokane, State of Washington, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the S1 /4 Corner of Section 35; thence S.89 ° 52'00 "W. along the South line of the SW1/4 of said Section and centerline of Wellesley Avenue as it now exists 60.00 feet in width, a distance of 661.05 feet; thence N.00 °05'38 "W., a distance of 30.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue and True Point of Beginning of this description; thence N.00 °05'38 "W. along the East boundary of Plat No. 4 of West Farms Irrigated Tracts, as per plat thereof recorded in Book "0" of Plats, page 51, in the Spokane County Auditor's Office, a distance of 1121.63 feet; thence N.62 °23'41 "E., a distance of 192.97 feet; thence N.40 °31'59 "E., a distance of 48.01 feet; thence N.65 ° 56'49 "E., a distance of 128.00 feet; thence S.46 ° 13'24 "E., a distance of 114.31 feet; thence S.23 ° 53'53 "W., a distance of 130.45 feet; thence S.12 °01'08 "E., a distance of 52.56 feet; thence S.18 °34'40 "W., a distance of 146.87 feet; thence South a distance of 910.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue, as it now exists 60.00 feet in width; thence S.89 °52'00 "W. along said Northerly margin a distance of 311.10 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description Containing 9.05 Acres, more or less And they do hereby dedicate to public use forever the streets and roads shown within this plat. Lots 3 and 4, Block 4 and Lot 4, Block 3, all one (1) foot wide strips as shown hereon, are hereby dedicated to Spokane County as general county property, to be dedicated for road purposes forever, at such time as the roads are continued as full width rights of way, or until adjacent lands are platted. All driveway approaches shall conform to the road plans on file in County Engineer's Office. Access permits are required for all approaches. Direct access from individual lots to Wellesley Avenue is hereby prohibited. A public water system, acceptable to County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, and water supplier (purveyor) will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. Water service for this plat shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System plan for Spokane County. No more than one dwelling structure shall be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. Lot 14, Block 2 is not a building site. Easements for drainage are reserved over a five (5) foot wide strip along each side of interior lot lines and over the rear five (5) feet of each lot. Within these easements, no structure, planting or other material shall be placed or permitted to remain which may change the direction of flow of drainage channels in the easements, or which may obstruct or retard the flow of water through drainage channels in the easements. The easement of each lot and all improvements in it shall be maintained by the owner of the lot, except for those improvements for which a public authority or utility company is responsible. A sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easement lying adjacent to all front and flanking street lot lines for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining utilities; for drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff is hereby granted. The County of Spokane is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easements adjacent to the public rights of way. The property owner shall maintain the sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easement with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage swale as indicated by the grade of adjacent streets. Sidewalks constructed within the sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easement shall be maintained by the property owner and left unobstructed and open for public use. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on -site sewage systems may be authorized. Dry sewerage lines as approved and required by the governing municipality shall be installed in the platted property. The Owners or Successors in interest agree to authorize the County to place their names on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owners' property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owners' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owners or Successors from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area -wide collection systems. Subject to special fees defined in TITLE NOTICE recorded under Spokane County Auditor's Document No. 8 3 0 3 • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said owners have hereunto set their hands and affixed their seals (i , 19;;I TUPPER, INC. President Bruce B. Mercedes Jeske r AAe-a-- Juq'ith A. Butler IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, as Trustee affixed its seal (if any) this day of OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON By Vice President DEDICATION By any) this -. -) day of for Faye S. Elliott, has hereunto set its hand and , 19 . Trust Real Estate Officer S/4 zo '. IVY:. = Examined and approved this _, day of Examined and approved this day of Examined and approved this day of This plat was Washington on ■ 2o SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in con- formance with the requirements of the Spokane County Platting Ordinance. Patrick J. M RLS Certificate Number 18091 COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Examined and approved this 33 ' day of N jCt .0 \ 9 Director, Spokane County Utilities COUNTY ENGINEER Examined and approved this 3/-- of � ' .i Spokane County Engineer COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT , 19 Director, Spokane County Planning Dept. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT COUNTY :Spokane County Health Officer COUNTY ASSESSOR t ;. 1 �1 (, Spokane County Assessor COMMISSIONERS approved and accepted by the County Commissioners of Spokane County, this day of� ; , 19 ' Chairman, Spokane County Commissioners COUNTY TREASURER I do hereby certify that all taxes which have been levied and become chargeable ainst t he land shown within this map have been fully paid this -- P'•.• / day of 0/\- ) , Spokane County Treasurer, 1 .1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS STATE OF WASHINGTON ) On this ~� day of 19 before ) ss me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the County of Spokane ) State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, per- sonally appeared Kenneth J. Tupper to me known to be the President of Tupper, Inc., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year last above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane STATE OF WASHINGTON ) I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State ) ss of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn,, do hereby County of Spokane ) certify that on this . day of Pir ..7- , , 19 R personally appeared before me, Mercedes Jeske, a married woman dealing in her separate property, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. Notar Public in and or„the Washington, residing at 4L STATE OF WASHINGTON ) I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State ) ss of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, do hereby County of Spokane ) certify that on this „ day of , , 19 - -, personally appeared before me, Bruce B. Butler and Judith A. Butler, husband and wife, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public in and the State of Washington, residing at Spokane STATE OF WASHINGTON ) On this `F-day of ;t , 19 , before me, ) ss the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of County of Spokane ) Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared and. to me known to be Vice President and Trust Real Estate Officer, respectively, of OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, the corporation that, as Trustee for Faye S. Elliott, has executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year last above written. tate of • Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane , 19 , 19 Direct Access to Wellesley Avenue is hereby prohibited. DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS thvt..TDC, - INC. -, yea Washington corporation; and THE, W.,MAIN uCORRORATIO a Washington Corporation; and M rc"ede=s Je -sikev and -0°L - NATIONAL= B =ANsK OF WASHEINGTO¢N, a national banking association, as Trustee +o Faye S Ell ± - 1 ott have caused to be platted into Lots, Blocks, and Streets the land shown hereon to be known as SUMMERFIELD EAST ADDITION, said land being part of the S 1/2 of Section 35, T. 26 N., R. 44 E.W.M., County of Spokane, State of Washington, and being more particu- larly described as follows: Beginning at the S 1/4 Corner of Section 35; thence S.89 °52'00 "W. along the South line of the SW 1/4 of said Section and centerline of Wellesley Avenue as it now exists 60 feet in width, a distance of 661.05 feet; thence N.00 °05'38 "W., a distance of 30.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue and TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence N.00 °05'38 "W. along the East boundary of Plat No. 4 of West Farms Irrigated Tracts, as per plat thereof recorded in Book "0" of Plats, Page 51, in the Spokane County Auditor's Office, a distance of 1121.63 feet; thence N.62 °23.'41 "E., a distance of 192.97 feet; thence N.40 °31'59 "E distance �-- a__.distance of 48.01feet; thence N.65 °56;'x49 "E,, a -- T feet; thence S.46 °13'24 "E.,, < -a distance of 114.31 feet; thence EAST a distance of 469.10 feet; thence - N_79 °35'56 "E a distance of_- 133.39 feet; thenceS.56 °39'30 "E`., a distance of 63.63 feet; thence N 74 °28' 06 "Ef, a distance of 128,00 feet, thence S.13 °55' 30 "E. , - a distance N5:19 feet, thence S. 89 °56'40 "E. ,_a__ distance of 36.43 feet; thence S,. °03'20 "W. , a dista nce o f_123.00 feet; thence S.36 °02'26 "E., a distance of 54.45 feet. thence S.00 °03'20"W., a distance of 123.00 feet; thence S.89 °56'40 "E., a distance of 375.09 feet; thence S.00 °25'19 "W., a distance of 560.01 feet; thence -N.89 °56'40 "W., a distance of 342.67 feet; thence S.00 °03'20 "W. , a distance of 133.00 feet; thence S.06 °17_'4_4 "_W. , a distance of_44.26 feet; thence S.00 °03'20 "W., a distance of 143.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue, as it now exists 60 feet in width; thence N.89 °56'40 "W. along said Northerly margin a dis= tance of 274.98 feet- thence NORTH a distance of 903 42 feet; thence WEST a distance of 700.00 feet; thence SOUTH a distance of 903.90 feet to said Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue, thence S.89 °52'00 "W. -- along said Northerly margin a distance of 311.10 ,. feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. Containing 25.74 Acres, more or less. And they do hereby dedicate to public use forever the streets and roads shown within this plat. No more than one dwelling structure shall be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots.or building sites Without filing a replat. A public water system, acceptable to .county and state health authorities, the local fire district, and water supplier (purveyor) will be installed within this plat,.an.d the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. Easements for drainage are reserved over a five (5) foot wide strip along each side of interior lot lines and over the rear five (5) feet of each lot. Within these easements, no structure, planting or other material shall be placed or permitted to remain which may change the direction of flow of drainage channels in the easements, or which may obstruct or retard the flow of water through drainage channels in the easements. The easement of each lot and all improvements in it shall be maintained by the owner of the lot, except for those improvements for which a public authority or utility company is responsible. An approved lot grading plan exists for all lots. Grading must conform to said plan on file in the County Engineers Office. A sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easement lying adjacent to all front and flanking street lot lines for the purpose of inStalling, operating and maintaining utilities; for drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff is hereby granted. The County of Spokane is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easements adjacent to the public rights of way.. The property owner shall maintain the sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easement with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage swale as indicated by the grade of adjacent streets. Sidewalks constructed within the sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easement shall be maintained by the property owner and left unobstructed and open for public use. All driveway approaches shall conform to the road plans on file in County Engineers Office. Access permits are required for all approaches. All lots within this subdivision are subject to a special front yard building setback of a minimum of forty (40) feet from the platted front property line, except Lots 5, 6,7, 8., 15, 16, 17 and 18, all in Block 2, which are subject to a special front yard building setback of a minimum of thirty (30) feet. Each lot is authorized for the temporary use of an individual on -site sewage disposal system only until an area -wide operating sewerage system is available. Dry sewerage lines as approved and required by the governing municipality shall be installed in the platted property as same is developed. As a consideration for the acceptance of this plat by the Spokane County Board of Commissioners, the owners of all non - public property herein platted into lots, blocks or tracts agree not to protest under 36.94 or 35.43.180 RCW the construction of, or legal assessment for, any sewer ultimately serving their non - public property at such time as it is desired by the governing municipality to construct such sewers. The agreement herein expressed shall be considered a covenant to run with the land and shall be carried as a provision of each and every deed drawn to transfer ownership of any and all property delineated within this plat. Each structure from which sewage is to issue shall be plumbed and connected to collector lines intended to serve the area even though use of individual on -site sewage disposal is authorized pending availability of an operating area -wide sewerage system. The plumbing shall prevent entry of sewage into the collector lines until authorized by the operating agency controlling the collector lines. Lot 2, Block I and Lot 4, Block 5, and Lots II and 12, Block 6, and Lot 3, Block 7, all one (I ) foot wide strips as shown hereon, are hereby dedicated to Spokane County as general county property, to be dedicated for road purposes forever, at such time as the roads are continued as full width rights of way, or until adjacent lands are platted. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said owners have hereunto set their hands and affixed their seals (if any) this day of , 1979. r, ". TAi C. President 0¢LD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON.. U.RE wW.- -MAI`N CORPORATION President i cedes.: Jeske Secretary IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, as Trustee for Faye S. Elliott, has hereunto , 1979. set its hand and affixed its seal. (if any) this day of By Vac.a ,,, Pi=es =idea By • Trust- I-LE:stet e 0_f,f ices FINAL PLAT of SUMMERFIELD EAST ADDITION BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE SI /2 OF SEC. 35, T.26N.,R.44E.W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AUGUST 1979 I, Patrick J. Moore, a registered Professional Land Surveyor, hereby certify that the map shown hereon was prepared by me subsequent to an actual survey on the ground in Augvsf 19 7 , and that the same conforms in all respects to the provisions of the ordinances of Spokane County, now in effect, and that the lot corners and monuments have been properly set as shown hereon. Examined and approved this day of Examined and approved this day of I do hereby certify that all taxes against the land shown within this , 1979. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE COUNTY UTILITIES DIRECTOR COUNTY ENGINEER 2 ak7 7 Patrick J. Moore, Professional Land Surveyor YE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY TREASURER ,"1979. Director, Spokane County Utilities 1979. Spokane County Engineer COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR Examined and approved this day of 1979. Director, Spokane County Planning Department COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Examined and approved this day of. , 1979. Spokane County Health Officer COUNTY ASSESSOR Examined and approved this day of , 1979. Spokane County Assessor This plat was approved and accepted by the County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington on this day of , 1979. Chairman, Spokane County Commissioners which have been levied and become chargeable map have been fully paid this day of Spokane County Treasurer SHEET / OF 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS STATE OF WASHINGTON ) On this day of , 1979, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public ) ss. in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) Kenneth J. Tupper to me known to be the President of TDC, INC., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year last above written. sr STATE OF WASHINGTON I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, do hereby certify that on this day of , 1979, personally appeared before me, Mercedes Jeske, dealing in her separate property, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instru- ment and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ss. GIVEN under my hand and official' seal the day and year last above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year last above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) On this day of , 1979, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public ) ss. in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) William W. Main and Katherine Lee Main, to me known to be the President and Secretary, respectively, of THE W. MAIN CORPORATION, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) On this day of , 1979, before me, the undersigned, a Notary ) ss. Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) appeared E. L. Rehn and E. Roger Moore, to me known to be Vice President and Trust Real Estate Officer, respectively, of OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, the corporation that, as Trustee for Faye S. Elliott, has executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seEl hereto affixed the day and year last above written. Notaty Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane. INLAND PAC /F /C ENG /NEER /NG AND CONSTRUCT /ON CORPORATION EAST /2720 NORA AVENUE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON : F.it wr • SUPERIOR REPROGRAPHICS Td =944 /a Vc. "T t) } 00 1:0.0. . ... Co 1". DR4P CUB S rA 0 +0o GG1�;V� DATA A 4e° 29' 17" 310,51 3 1 Q . 1' _ c- z -o.1 4 - 70.E b : GKAYE. . AT' o COEL j P'Ris.11 1 Do tc* con5T, 'r (.1,/e.v40. n Est Ct b-r t)131- $81.- taw w/Cco.)TV 3 mot}AR KING ` ?. Covarz'. : :'iQP: OF' (ZAP :. . . E.t;sV . 262fl. OG.+: L= Z5" 47'48 L ' ' i - r t .7 ' - ►9.85 L63.42• tr0f15j'; viate T•rart.5IA-icOt (See rypCrrx tr. .� O F44 +..0.1.341 V.'—zpst.t9 Q oa' wz' s � 8 o 6010 6010 D L 8L D DV, , C�x�ty ry_7D ktiwt , CoVg2 0 StJSTALL 2 - z# PVC 5Ecrio06 L Paz OT L.hJDETZ 61DEWf;L( To FACT t.I TA . FOWEF< , TELEPHONE, At\) U11/4) •VZ.ttJKL6 . GENEN / N07 AL 1� i T aH �:�.� tt t.s t -r t-± A,tv t-LiaG. e. I--I Av l tit e. I■+ .R.R -1:oirt�'.s ,t 1.'e i°t 11Si Wtrt�4 CIJr 'tt'tt$H D St.i'g,p k*.c— ltd iLT M L. AL-40 ji -4lr. - t . ME.T n,C Tt11 BE. 6 (.tY o X 3/4) ■PWf'°+ Tii�IS PowrtoK1 t F t�E "LJat 6,a t - r R.f .T E p " / r TI r, F L- (_Oi - . T PWc.•ric PO TELEP1431 3= .VAULTS E-?(Pd"-a tc Lx - 1 o i HAIR P lIn;t -,A JLc:)aiat? CAF- St j _ 1/ 7 . � a.Rtc WA.t. Face of SW. •T r S,c t . .: } (� ,-- OF Li KS- 1-4 1-4i . 510 �tur t:7 s 1 4 „ CC zo ttle ur n Z V Z ca ''V I 76 u � In gLZ Z 0 -A Z —4 WA:14 VAL.. ' RP Va 3' OE PT' 4-t Airr 6 /Ad, SUPERIOR 'REPROGRAPHICS T9 • bc, • fob V.0 • '11'4 6 R 't -I .6 i7Rt 'SWAt. 113.55 2ttiz7. rc '7, G52 202.7.'w5" �r 13 .5 Cok6T 591 3t 1_ Vq.1 csR UMh./ Rfl :: E • i; V'r' Qo'27: 431 :'5 . 'O. v. .GRATE EN : �: O27 �g EcR A + Co r DEL ESL. c'w .� w o, °5?tt rt' /nrG `CoVgtt •n5 ... ... .... . .................. ......... 03.42 SYiCa� E' Sc4 sT& .O3 2O 2 8. 303 / VI c 1 APW A STANtDARD C 1.. PLAN No,to T'(PE- E4 3u ZFIELO AN + C . 74. 6' 15 +3S \g ASP NA .T CEMENT SURFACE, . L ' MIN U' To C{3LIR5 ,1A-1-it oETE .M)NS b B`? 'TKP, FFIC € SO1LS ..... ................ 34r0 ` RIU! -1T dF . .. 14 CURB XP SORE ® GOTrE -� .r r taEVGL ,.C����,,..: DR1\ WA`t APPROAC PE5 CURS DROPS TO f3g FLUSH W/ASPHk r ALL QNDER.GROUNI) UTIL 1T1E ` 5E 1NSTALLEh °13EFORE' PAviNCG CONSTRUCT ION . Jr P 04$t 1 : fA057 DROP' c STA t4 )3 42' Rs V 4e 2..7, R Mc..R y © Z. 7,d D K S -rA ' q°\ = 0 • • ITO VC 13C 04- 0 .14) R s ir a' - 10 - E I 2bE156 co nc 88.42 72.75 3uMM flE 88.42 72. 75' CoN67 • T: 88G bw w/ i .. •N`r 6TD RING # COVE e YI1 , J I tS4. :ELF' =aE t t f C; et jAC.L{ shall : censh ck neS5r txsin 0°65 . »E e kiX s (VI) cement l P ;►. .,.5 c. ........ ............................... . ....... . ........ . ... ............ ............................. ... ............................... ........ ............................... ....... ............................... H ead wo. \\ retir q ck g'.`. ecrit I1SA-0, \ \e+ Invert cx* swo\e and some e\e.v, l tJ 8 TRAM To * .... ........................ ........... ........ ............................... ...... ............................... MIM 0.3 % GaaiG i���' ........ ............................... DRYkeLL "R t�oN� 7 T PI% 2\r t r° w -DET . 5.4/4A. TYPiUAL.. ra51 T.F;:Jr,# C O V E''C Q° R S �o ►cp.^t C� UN'i" Y. D Ti L- APPf ok1 - aG 41..--e 21) ; 9 €a ' OF' DRVNNt 0.04 A ( "r a S At-G CTYPKA.1- o .4 i. OR\r`r' LL..5 C- ra1T>~ 1 3 c.C-1 - 1 o .! TT?AF.I SUPERIOR REPROGRAPHICS :' TB•344 0400 500 fl s i‘` '5Ctz srA 00 ±a9. to / 2021.6/ t)A thdtA./' ' wasined Yd \\ey G rAve 3' x a." x '` C'Q1) ;422.55" E Al ,t\ ,) Ut 1v'vistitr.�� E �-a cam 1 v ;a�' 3 tom+m P*114 EL\... ,4. E. t.. AP 5HP,L1.. ,s coo 1 i RL1GTE'D (11/) o 0..A5S 5 C 3'4) . E M .haT W p . W _ -C7 1 - c o , w c : [ZiG.HTT. SUPER! OR TB -34 0 +00 ' Si GR a '`Pti //# 2b.,o 2029.28 MC. , 9 BCR s 'A 0 +42.04 2029, 3S Cof. { I S 4.94, 2 d?. . 8.95a t 'BC R. ST6_'0 + 4J. , ) to N4' 2oz9.'35 tv;Ll � 1 ✓1f F I . Zt7.z8.1 , oa 9. 2• 7.3f R aTJ /Z.t ad:. © 2 ©28.97 BCR STA. Z* 34.96 t 2027. (3/ Nth, R 1 4 0? T sr t.g: • 5-rA . 44.00. _ 3 C,oN T- $ot BBL. bvU w/ ConN7 + srb ICdvEx 10 s ........... • ........................... o `R �M 5 25 9&r 2QZ7.6B Mt F& - e) 1+ l✓. AD «2: .9.-0 2�' , Gel r/y� l qq p iirsviamair Vt A to C?C� 85.00 a fit =1 `�Ci4 et?. L-'j 7 rs 'Cd3s3�3 7' STD ,E A. 74 :•$L 2027. 50 Zc'r7•90' I1 . `7 4-. cycgon f` A t:'. -l-= 9.78 4a t3, =jam DATA 9° 80' 00" tk 644.70' X42: t .6 5 ":7' trrr■•vca, / t■ C- S -.O. 'I 9 • 0 8, -t-;r 7. � CEPVE i�ATA /S= 1(0° 42' t2 5t4.ot' 149.85.' 0 4 ;' 20 - a WO �' V Z r 0 Z Z0 v: et- 4y a Z v 4 ® "" Z4 AREA = ACC 1.1' AREA = DIFFERENCE = OENISITY : /ACRE DENSITY: 4 LOTS/ACRE ;EST LOT: O. SQ FT .EST LOT: 0. SQ FT ;AGE LOT: 11413. SO FT FE LOTS: ill {� 7 AREA = .ACCU1 AREA = . DIFFERENCE = S DENSITY: 3 :LOTS /;ACRE T DENSITY: 4 LOTS /ACRE GEST LOT: O. SQ,FT LEST LOT: O. S O FT R .GF 101 11418. SQ F T X31 LOS: 3 AREA ST-AT LSIJCS FOR.: SUU ERFIF1 0 FAST ADD A - E - A -S T 2 H S -TICS FOR: S U^ M E' F I EL D-- E- A-S-T ADD 6 CL 6 CL 6 CL 6 CL 6 CL 6 CL 6 CL 6 CL - CURVE: DELTA 6 CL 6 CL +CURVE: DELTA 6 CL 6 CL 6 CL +CURVE: Of-LTA 7 7 7 - CURVE: 7 7 +CURVE : 7 7 7 7 7 7 CL CL CL DELTA CL CL DELTA CL CL CL CL CL CL SL SL 7 SL +CURVE: DELTA 7 SL 7 SL - CURVE: DELTA 7 SL 7 SL +CURVE: DELTA 7 SL 7 SL 7 SL 7 SL 24107. SQ FT ( 0.55 ACRES) O. SQ FT ( 0..0 ACRES) 24107. SQ FT 24107. SQ FT (• 0.55 ACRES) O. SQ FT ( 0.0 ACRES) 24107. SQ FT N 40 N 65 S 46 N 90 N 79 FL E 1206 FILE: 1206 S 56 39 30E N 77 12 12E S 64 12 12W = 13 0 0 N 2,5 47 48i S 0 0 OE 25 47 48 N 89 59 604 N 0 0 OE S 64 1 59W = 64 1 59 6 SL N 65 56 49E 6 SL S 46 13 24E 6 SL N 90 0 OE 6 SL N 79 35 56E 6 SL N 79 35 56E 6 SL 5 SL N 0 5 3811 229.350 229.350 5 SL N 62 23 41E 192.970 89.418 5 Si N 62 23 41E 332.510 154.078 5 SL S 51 56 49W 332.510 - CURVE: DELTA = 10 26 52 RADIUS = 332.510 5 S L S 51 56 49W 20.000 5 SL S 51 16 29E 20.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 76 46 42 RADIUS = 20.000 5 SL S 51 16 29E 317,630 5 SL S 89 54 22W 317.630 - CURVE: DELTA = 38 49 9 RADIUS = 317.630 5 SL S 0 5 38E 23.600 5 SL S 89 54 22W 20.000 5 SL S 0 5 38E 20.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 90 0 0 RADIUS = 20.000 5 SL S 89 54 22W 11.3.550 31 59E 56 49.E 13 24E 0 OE 35 .56E 128.000 114.310 469. 100 1.3.3.390 536.010 S 68 40 39W 5.36.010 494.844 AREA = 52. 171 0.000 24.082 96.770 N 89 56 40W 136.040 0.132 S 66 29 58W 664.700 N 60 30 OE 664.700 327.314 5 59 58 RADIUS = 664.700 LENGTH N 60 30 OE 5.14.010 253.111 S 77 12 12' 514.010 16 42 12 RADIUS = 514.010 LENGTH S 56 39 30E 32.560 N 74 28 6E S 13 55 30E S 89 56 40E S 0 3 20W S 36 2 26E N 89 56 40W N 0 3 20E S 64 14 58W = 64 11 33 S 64 14 .53W N 60 30 O E 3 44 58 N 60 .30 OE S 74 28 611 = 13 5.8 6 N 74 28 6E S 13 55 30E S 89 56 40E S 0 3 20W 128.000 75 .190 36.430 12_.3.000 27.225 34.275 204.956 LENGTH = 60.633 12.328 12.512 LENGTH = 26.801 198.705 0 .521 LENGTH = 215.201 23.600 0,033 20.000 LENGTH = 31.416 0.136 472.845 472.840 729.135 72 AREA = 43760. S1 FT ( 1.00 A 24.170 18.370 128.000 52.171 114.310 79.035 469.100 0.000 133.390 24.082 31.070 17.077 514.010 .113.849 514.010 223.686 RADIUS = 514.010 LENGTH = 116.625 633.860 570.692 633.860 633.860 RADIUS = 633.860 .LENGTH = 285.387 324.850. 0.000 310.510 310.510 310.510 RADIUS = 310.510 LENGTH = 347.022 135.958 1089.674 1089.666 AREA = 136161. SQ FT ( 3.13 / 79.085 265.054 194.902 = 102.171 7.272 18.558 = 31.217 - CURVE: DELTA = 10 55 17 RADIUS = 536.010 LENGTH 6 SL S 68 40 39W 20.000 6 SL S 21 53 30E 20.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 89 25 51 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH 6 SL N 21 53 30W 61.1.860 567.739 6 SL S 0 0 OE 6.11.8 60 611.860 +CURVE: DELTA = 21 53 30 RADIUS = 611.860 LENGTH = 233.780 6 SL N 89 59 60W 324.850 0.000 6 SL N 0 0 OE 288.510 288.510 6 SL S 35 56 49tW 288.510 117.592 +CURVE: DELTA = 65 56 49 RADIUS = 288.510 LENGTH = 332.072 1029.2 72 1029.2 70 13.34..3 80 . 13: AREA = 112907. SQ FT ( 2.59 = 6'9.601 113.849 = .. 149.848 17 .896 72.980 0.035 123.000 22.014 614.831 614.829 1246.966 12 AREA = 31161. SQ FT ( 0.72 93.090 0.090 20.000 20.000 20.000 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH 686. 700 686.700 338..147 RADIUS = 686.700 LENGTH = 44.938 492.010 242,277 492.010 131.746 RADIUS = 492.010 LENGTH = 119.949 128.000 34.275 75.190 36.430 123.000 08/07/79 08,/07/79 634.790 AREA = 494.840 673.018 67 55357. SQ FT ( 1.27 A 8.689 = 22.408 298.340 72.930 0.035 123.000 171.002 294.657 26 TANGENT = 3 1 15.603 TANGENT = 1 247.800 = T�A 0.039 0.033 TANGENT = 2 11 15.708 116.886 82.537 469.100 131.198 25.956 501.243 TANGENT = 0.0 TANGENT = 1 3; 0.0 2 TANGENT = lz 1342.627 13 116.886 82.537 469.100 131.1'98 527.202 TANGENT = 7.457 TANGENT = 0.0 TANGENT = 0.0 2 TANGENT = 1 +. 578.525 TANGENT = 447.372 TANGENT 27.201 123.326 18.095 36.430 16.018 0.019 TANGENT = 597.673 TANGENT = 428.224 TANGENT = 123.325 18.095 36.430 31 4f 2i 4s 2<' 4 634.790 1203.767 12 24107. SQ FT ( 0.55 SUPERIOR REPROGRAPHICS, TB =344" . t aO *1-. 0. : rt C3020. G R . trr e, i .47 2o2�,S 2021.(c Li curb Drop 1U E.c R. S A, otq2 Mc-F e 2 4 9 a , ; , ' - �s a t +9, s � 1 026,60 4 6 7a NttKIU 5 Toe' cz7L4 (tDETS- RMiibl TR F ,iD tIS.. APwI STAN QAR 0 ' PLAN Ne, ►, TYP A ". CURE> :EX Pr 3UR U 'TL ALL t_.tNC Et'�'ti, # L NE› • UTiL...JTf T® ALL N 5s5/ UnLJ 1 \'t' ? ! .A I° t o;-Ira. } t. g10 R., TO P/ \/7 t, E c.R ,S .n 0442.04 2029. 3S "2.0z9, 3Z, 6;R rA 114 ?).0/ 2029.28 3.. QQ17t9 .' - CQO47. QOM R'stA -.i :cJ4$. 9? 5cole: / „ =50' 2026. 03 2026. 1/3.56 BCR /t /5.52 2026' Z7 SIDEWALK' County BM - Spike in P. Pole of 5W Corner of Wellesley and Evergreen Elev. = 2023..75 County Datum ECR O+ 2. 2026 . MCR 5 /AEW4LK ' INSTALL STREET SIGN 4.-STOP 5 /6N 2 N89 E 3 EXISTING WELL ESL E Y ` A VEAJ ) UE PAV /NG SEC TIOIV 35 -26- Iy INSTALL GUARD RAIL PER_ SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD _ Q t � IJ I C 8CR /74 /5. \ I 202765 S /DEWALx ORNG. 1/3.55 5WA AI 89 ° 59 '22 " coNST. TYPE A' PRY WELL W/ METAL FRAME GRATE TYPE 3 WABASH AVENUE ORNG. //3.55 SWAGE 5 /PEWAL.K TYP. GURB PROP STA. /t /5 $c/ I* /5.55 20Z7.35 MCR 202211 / ECR 8 +62. n 20Z7. 63 ECR 9t38./8 2027.OZ MGR 2027.33 INSTALL STREET 5 /6N RETURN d = 77 ° /8'32" R = 20.00 L =2(0.99 T= /6. 'BCR= /2#354:5 2027. `fro MCR 2027.29 ECR= // 4 -67.5 Z027.07 13CR= 07437.96 2027.52 MCR 2027.28 ECR = // *57.59 2020. 99 INSTALL 5 G N SIGN RETURN d= 9/ ° 254' /3' R =20.00 L = 3/.9/ T 20.50 *" ' • 0 4 • Er) 's, • o c) S cc) • y,CGV 41 c o p p res Zy) q CL rn Oc U a) ) c C o O , 0 ci , ✓ • C Q ' C , w 4e, ✓ v 0 CU 0 4-, r Q Q1 d.tn Cy ('O CAL 740 =c SHEET NO, Z of i f' 203 LEFT CURB 202 203 EX /5T. 20 20 EX /ST RIGHT CURB 20 . :. . . :::U • 0 0 O o. 0 o 0 # 00 m ...... • . • 0 D04 : : 4. .N � N f. 00480 01 Ot0 . . . . . _ 0 0Lc LA •.N 4. 0 O 0 . 4: 3.72. ..... ....................... . = :6.00.20 . N• Iry .00000:: Lei N t, p002Z.: N a N N: • .t.002 0 a•• N-• .. •O N N. N O N #.0,0 /89. x.04295 • 0 4. N ch o 0 2 LEFT CURB 3 CENTER RIGHT :CURB • 0 0 O 0 4. 0 .. 0 .. ... . . o 4. O N N O F-� 7 0 0800 4. O r • O- r: N N 0 / 0d: ' VC. .... /0 0' V. C . .0/25'0 • 0 N 0 N II N N N O N TOP OF GRATE ELEV.. =2026: STA. / */7 1• LEFT CURB CENTER 2020 03 RIGHT" CURB 0 O II N N N /OD' vC- 7400.' v.0 N • N 0 •N a O N . - N O. f . 008.b4 . 00800 • . . . . O N + O \ N / ..1J.0.9.0 0 1. 1 /00 N. . N 100 O IrN 4. S .vC S II PA L N 0 N, • O O 4. N N' 0 N 'v.c m N, 0' N' • O 0 N. N ozi N 0 N N 0 N 0 . 00800 00800 O 0 O O O 4. - 0 3 CURVE DATA D = 24 °28'96" R = 3/o. 5/ L = /32.66 T = 67.36 C = /3/.66 N. 0 N m N N N N O ................ E6-S 607 - 898 VW01)1091 W 2 x 0 if I - cc .............. Z 0 ( CO 0 C ? n C Z m O n Zr,," o 0 0 Z 0 0 0 0 0 n1 m 24 0 U, no 0 0 m SUPERPORREPROGRAPHICS TB -344` UTILITY .CQRA /N1GE .E5 USE`6JHEN DRAINAGE 34/4LE B Y DRAINAGE STRUC'TURES :., - PRECAST CONC. NLEr, T -yPE ,i ( WHEN SPEC ✓F /ED) 'O" DRY/JELL . CONNECT ION EXPANS ION .'JOINTS •EXI PAVEMENT rasr` riiiQesreriso�r a4�aeiriss.�o`oaasdrssmmssrar�s reo�risr ®ism a" CULVERT — SECTION A -A. ONLY ! DRYWELL CONNECT /ON PIPE SECT /ON B -B ONhY Zit !✓HEEL CA/AIR RAMP til4RP aR4DING OF O A /NAGE 314ALE io MATCl/ INVERT OF CULVERT A/VP PROV /DE P05/T /VE DRAINAGE LW /TiUOIJT Ph/PPL /NG NS /DE THE CUL VE,PT NOTE ` , A f ) -T #/G/! /5 TD 'SE CaNSTg FOO ALONG BERM THE NORTH PLAT BOUNDARY ' AND ALONG THAT PORT /D/11 OF THE EAST. BOUNDARY NORTH OF THE TRENTWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHooL *El MINI ADVANCE. WARN /NG PANEL. TYP /C4L WI/EEL ClAhe RAMP CONF /611h'ATI USE WI/EN. DRAINAGE /S TO P445 UNDER i 4MP. CONSTRUCT /ON 'OF'. G11.IEEL CHAIR ' RAMP, CULVERT ' AND NEADA/4LLS TO OCCUR CONCyrREHT win,' CURB` cOAISTR /cTioN. 11EA SEE DETAIL) � 8 ceL vEa T AsrM .3034 PVC ARP` GRAD /NG or ORA /NAGS 31.14 LE TO MATCH INVERT CULVERT AND ;PROVIDE POSE /TIVE DRAINAGE W /TNOUT PUD,DL /NG //415/DE ".ri -IE CULVERT LIJ ta cc' 4 A:4 kiN DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that TDC, INC., a Washington corporation; and THE W. MAIN CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation; and Mercedes Jeske; and OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, d national banking association, as Trustee for Faye S. Elliott have caused to be platted into Lots, Blocks, and Streets the land shown hereon to be known as SUMMERFIELD EAST ADDITION, said land being part of the S 1/2 of Section 35, T. 26 N., R. 44 E.W.M. County of Spokane, State of Washington, and being more particu- larly described as follows: Beginning at the S 1/4 Corner of Section 35; thence °52'00 "W. along the South line of the SW 1/4 of said Section and centerline of Wellesley Avenue as it now exists 60 feet in width, a distance . - of 661.05 feet; thence N.00 05 3$ W, a distance of 30.00 feet to the Northerly mar of Wellesley Avenue and Y g y TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; N. 00°05 ' 38 "W. W.` along the East thence as boundary of Plat.:. No. 4 of West Farms Irrigated Y es arms Irr at ed T . �� �� g Tracts, as p thereof Auditor's • plat recorded in Book 0 of Plats Page ge an the S okane County -0ffic P Y Office, a distance of 1121.63 1 1.63 feet thence N.62 23 41 E. adi. feet; distance e of 192.97 feet; thence N.40 °31 . 59 E. _ a distance of 48.01 feet; thence..N 5 � .6 6 49 E. a distance 2 � � t of 1 8.00 feet; thence S.46 °13 24 E. a distance of 114.31 t o � n feet, thence EAST a distance of 469.10 feet; thence N79 °35 56E. a distance of 133.39 feet, thence S:56 39 3Q E, a distance of .of `63.63 feet; thence N.74 ° 28'06 "E., a distance of `128.00 feet; thence S.13 °55'30 "E., a distance of 75.19 feet; thence 5.89°56'40"E., ° a distance of 36.43 feet; thence S.00 03 2O W. a distance of 123.00 feet; thence S.3 ° ' 4 ' 6 02 26 E. , a distance of 5 E,45 feet; thence S.00 03 20 W, a distance ° �� , , ance of 123.00 feet; thence S e .89 56 40 E a � �� W, ., a distance of 375,09 feet; thence n e S.00 25 19 , a distance of 560 .01 feet; thence N distance feet; ence . 89 56 40 W a - distance `of 342.67 - f „ pet, .thence S.00 °03'2-0 °, W:, a distance of 133.00 feet; thence S.06 1744 " W. a distance of 44.26 feet; thence S.00 °03'20 "W., a distance of 143.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue, as it now exists 60 feet in width; thence N.89 °56'40 "W. along said Northerly margin a dis tance of 274.98 feet; thence NORTH a distance of 903.42 feet; thence WEST a distance of 700.00 feet; thence SOUTH a distance of 903.90 feet to said Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue; thence S. 89 °52' Q0 "W. along said Northerly,, margin a distance of 311.10 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. Containing 25.74 Acres, more or less. And they do hereby dedicate to public use forever the streets and roads shown within this plat. ructure shall rx.t,z; b - e e e placed on an gone lot, nor shall ' P Y , ll an lot b further urther s ubdi vi f ` ` ' ,_ y subdivided or the-.purposes r ores e u P P N o more of creatin ad ,.. . ... Without replat. �, l Tots . r , o b �. � 9 U ld n9 .�s�.tes�;..wathout filing i ng� a .replat.. A� .ubl irc water.: _ .. p F,system_.:acce table, to -county , s• state .. .. .,. .... A p y tate health author? ti es,, the l oca�l fire di s�tr�,ct,: and} water supplier'' (purveyor) .urve or� will be ins led: wi - $ . (P Y ) th n this pTat,- and, t sub wi�l •� rovide for =�ndi iu :.� ,_. ,�� p v - dual domest,Lczwater_ as , ire-protection well:::as f.... to :._each lot prior to sale of Use of p each l ot.�. private wells and water systems is -.prohibited. Easements for drainage are reserved over a five (5) foot wide strip each side ) p along ch side of interior lot .lines and over the rear five (5) feet of each lot. Within these easements, no structure, planting 'or other material shall be placed or . p o permitted for remain which , ich may change the direction of flow of Y 9 ow o drainage channel in the easements, ents,'or which may obstructor retard the flow low of water through drainage channels in the easements. The easemEiit of each lot and all improvements p is in it shall be maintained by the owner of the lot, except for those improvements for which a public authority or utility company is responsible. A sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easement lying adjacent to all front and f street lot lines for the purpose of instafin 9, operating and maintaining utilities; for drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff is hereby granted. The County of Spokane pokane is::hereby granted the right of ingress and egress .to all sixteen 9 g xteen (16) foot wide ;utility and drainage easements adjacent to the public rights of way. The property owner shall maintain the sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easement with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and/or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage' water in the drainage swale as indicated by the grade of adjacent, streets. Sidewalks constructed within the sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easement shall be maintained by the property owner and left unobstructed and open for public use. All ., lots , t within i hn this ... subdivision U Vi i s on are subject to as special front rout and building p y u ldin setback of a mini mum of forty t (40) feet from the . , Y ( platted front property o ert line . ne except t o P Lis P Y 5 6 7 8 5 1 6 7 and r P 18 `al! in :Bl 2 t which are subject to , a special tail front yard building a minimum of thirty (30) :feet. Each lot is authorize for - • authorized or the temporary p use of an individual on -site e s Y t sewage disposal system only until an area -wide sewerage 9 P Y Y w de P ra e s s tem i s available. 9 ale. 'Dr `sewerage 9 Y :lines.as approved and Y pP required by the governing municipality shall 'b a Y 9 9 P Y be ns to 11`` ed in the 1a tted property r p e t as same is developed. ` s P p Y A a consideration p for the a acce tnce of this plat P P the Spokane e Count ' _ Y Board of Commissioners, P Y m ssioners the owners r w e s of all non ublic r' o ert herein platted P P P Y tted into lots, P , blocks or tracts agree ee not. to rotes t under, 36. 94 0 r 9 35.4 .1 P 3 80 RCW.the construction of, or legal assessment for, 9 any sewer ultimately serving their non - public property at such time as it is desired by the governing municipality to construct such hsewrs . The a • 9 9 P Y t uct sewers. . eerien t herein ex Pressed ed s ha 11' b 9 p be considered a covenant to run with the land and shall be curried as a r i pov sion of each and every deed drawn to transfer ownershi of any and y d all property delineated within -this plat. Each structure from which sewage is to issue shall be plumbed and connected to collector lines intended to serve the area even though use of individual on -site sewage disposal is authorized pending availability of an operating area -wide sewerage system. The plumbing shall prevent entry of sewage into the collector lines until authorized by the operating agency controlling the collector lines. :Direct": Access to .Wellestei `venue_ is, h ereby prohibited. L117 .2 Bio`ck and eon f are hereb y � h' time as the Lot 4, -Biock .5,, and Lots AI 1, ,j Block:6 and Lot 3, Block-7, al on (1 foot wide ` Strips s � ! ) st ip as shown . dedicated to Spokane Count as general county y 9 y to be dedicated for road purposes forever; at roads are continued as full width rights of way, or until adjacent 'lands are platted. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said owners have hereunto set their hands and affixed their seals (if any) this day of , 1979. T. D. C:, INC. THE W. MAIN CORPORATION President President Secretary Mercedes Jeske IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, as Trustee for Faye S. Elliott, has hereunto set its hand and affixed its seal (if any) this day of , 1979. OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON By By Vice President Trust Real Estate Officer Examined and approved Examined and approved Examined and Examined and approved this FINAL PLAT of EAST ADDITION BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE SI /2 OF SEC. 35, T.26N.,R.44E.WM. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AUGUST 1979 SURVEYOR S CERTIFICATE I, Patrick J. Moore, a registered Professional al Land Surveyor, hereby certify that Y Y the map shown hereon was ; prepared by me subse to an actual Y Q survey on the rou d, n i n g v �s 19 , A 9 a d n that , the same , e c 7.9 onform i conforms in all respects . p t o the e rovisions of the ordinances P of Spokane County, now in effect, and that at the lot corners and monuments have been e ro rl set as shown hereon. P P Y O Off' Patrick J. Moore, Professional Land Surveyor COUNTY UTILITIES DIRECTOR this day of Y 1979. .. Director, Spokane County Utilities COUNTY T ENGINEER R this day of .. 1979. Spokane County Engineer COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR approved this day of 1979. Director, Spokane County Planning Department COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT day of. 1979. Spokane County Health Officer COUNTY ASSESSOR Examined and " approved d e this day of PP Y , 1 Spokane County Assessor COUNTY UNT COMMISSIONERS This lat was a roved and Commissioners nd acce ted b the County Commissi PP P Y_ Y of S okane Count , P County, on this day of 1979. Chairman, Spokane County Commissioners COUNTY TREASURER do ' hereby certify that all taxes which have been levied and become chargeable against the land shown within this map have been fully paid this day of , 1979. Spokane County Treasurer STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. ) COUNTY OF SPOKANE and voluntary act and deed of is authorized to execute the SHEET /`OF ACKNOWLEDGMENTS On this day' of , 1979, before me, the undersi ned a N 9 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared Kenneth J. Tupper to me known to be the President esident of TDC, INC., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowled the said instrument ment to be the free said cor d corporation, for the uses and purposes mentioned and on oath stated that he said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. orporaton. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year last above written. GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day and year last above Y Y ' WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year last above written., STATE OF WASHINGTON ) I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned ) ss. and sworn, do hereby certify that on this day of , 1979, COUNTY OF SPOKANE er o s nail appeared before ore me, Mercedes Y ' J PP Jeske, dealing aling in her separate property, . P to me known t o be the .. , e and ividu described esc rib d e in and who executed exc d to the within and foregoing oin instru _ g 9 ment and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses ' and ur purposes therein mentioned. P P STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SPOKANE Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, a i gton; residing at Spokane. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane. On n thi s day a of Y 9 1 79 before e ore me t d the undersigned, Notary Public • g , a otar ' Y ss.: in and a for the State of Washington, duly commissioned ssioned g and _sw Y sworn, personally appeared ) William W. M i Y eeared c a n and Katherine erin L e ee Main, .to me known to b e thePresidn President and Secretary, respectively, of THE W. MAIN CORP P Y, ORATION -the corporation oration that executed the foregoing P instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the and voluntary act and deed of said . corporation, for the uses and ur therein,ment P p mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to the said instrument and that the seal affixed e (if any) is the ) corporate orate seal p pal of said corporation. WITNESS my and y a official seal hereto affixed the day and year y y a last above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) On this day of , 1979, before me, -the undersigned, a Notary ) ss. Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) appeared E. L. Rehn and E. Roger Moore, to me known to be Vice President and Trust Real Estate Officer, respectively, of OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, the corporation that, as Trustee for Faye S. Elliott, has executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notaty Public in and for the State of Washington, . residing at Spokane. /NLAND AC /F /C iv /VEER/ G AND CONSTRUCT/ON CORPOf?AT/OIV EAST /2720 NORA AVENUE SPOKANE, WASH /NGTOi�% . SW COR SEC 35-26-44 3543, Fnd. 3/4' I.P. Fos three R.P.'s of record Tk in T.Pole N 50E,38.77' Tk. in P. Pole S "50 W, 372 "'eon face of stand pipe S40E,4667' / 1 199319 2644`.24 2644.20 (Record Fad 5/8 rebar as per Record of Survey, Auditors No.7902210192 in Survey Book`. 18, Page 5 LQT,z. • .t2 }''BLOCK,... 6 . T wJde s1Np WABAH N89°54' 22 "E AV N89 °54' 22 "E N89°54' 22" E 133.55 N89 °54' 22 "E 133.55 N89°54' 22"E 133.55 133.55 N89°54' 22"E 133.55 N 89°54' 22 "E 133.55 N89°54' 22" E 133.55 22' 22' N89°54' 22" E 134.91 N89 ° 54'22''E 135.04 N89°54' 22" E 0 0 0 m 134.78 N89°54' 22" E 134.65 N89 °54'22 "E 134.51 134.38 N89°54' 22" E /0' WIDE WALKWAY 90.00 N 84° 56 08 E 114.80 N89°54' 22"E 134.22 N89 °54' 22 "E 134.09 N89°54' 22 "E 133.96 N89°54' 22"E N89°54' 22"E 133.70 O ' 0 6 113.56 589°52'00'W 311. i0 155.55 e 155.50 BA5/5 OF BEAR /NGS 113.53 N 89° 52' 00" E 93.72 350.00 WELLESLEY S 90° 00' 00" E 469.10 80.00 80.00 80.00 68.51 BLOCK 6 85.00 85. 80.00 w w to 0p 0 18 go 9 19 I8 °o N BLOCK 3 324.85 80.00 N90°00' 00"W 90.00 N 90° OO' -OO" W 70e • • 80.00 AVENUE S I/4 CORNER SEC 35 -26-44 350.00 t3 °, E N "79 3 59 oe(g) 31.5639. -Y 3544, Fnd. 2' Pipe w/ Wire in Mon. Case Fits three R.P.'s of record Tk. T.PoleS40E,- 41:98' ; X' on Curb N45 °E, 55.60' �j X • bn Curb N40 W 60.32 m 133.00 0 N90°00' 00" E m 0l 10' WIDE ;,WALKWAY N 83°49' ii "E 130.0 10 N90°00' 00"E M • N90 °00' 00 "E N90°00' 00 "E 133.00 N90 °00' 00 "E 133.00 N90°00' 00" E N90°00' 00" E AVENUE --- P---- T �- '1 - 1 V/' � �� ; (,, �, r >/r� /C / ''n > t; j 1 0 133.00 N90°00' 00"E 36.43 ?. co N- � pu 3 9 m sr 0 93.09 1 N89 °P40 '.W N 112.98 0 N89°56' 40"W h l 1M 155.00 1 136.04 cv VENUE N 91 .0 22' 22' 22', 22' S 89°56 40 E 36.43 85.37 N89°56 40" 108.84 { 788.440 88.42 W.4BS SH ° -56' 40°W co 335.00 N 9 Q U9 o BLOCK 2 N89 °56' 40 "W N89 °56' 40 "W N89 °56' 40 "W 98.00 88.42 85.00 N 89° 56' 40"W °D SU/M�MERF /ELD .335' oo . m COURT ( 0- 77.83 88.42 72.75 gy p;: ,S 0 97.73 N89°56' 40" W 103, 82: BOAD N N89°66' .40" W a 122.55 i‘i` ,4 VENUE 274.98 119.95 12�� . 45 - tor 3, BLOC) I' wide strip m tY1 o o ' 0 (n f 1'wide / BLOC p S06 °1744 " 44.26 88.42 88.42 375 .' 09 S 89° 56' 40" E 85.00 72.75 oN 19 N 18 BLOCK 2 85.00 N 89 °56' 40"W 342.67 148.70 29.50 N89°56' 40" W - 146.41 30.00 "'1 56' 40 "W O 87.80(R) 30.00 SE C0R' SEC 35 - 44 # 3545, End. Brass Cop in Mon. Case Fits one remaining R.P. of record, Tk in P. Pole NE, 53.30' Set two new R P.'s: Tk. in Guy Pole N46 °W, 47.24' Tk in P. Pole S 50 E, 52.63' LEGEND 0 Fnd. Points (5 /8 "rebar,except as noted) O Set 1/2" rebar at angle points in bdry. a Set 1/2" rebar as C monuments - Set I/2 "rebar at all lot corners NOTE: Front /op corners and € monuments to be set after utilities ore installed NOTE: The Basis of Bearings for this map is the = 100 bearing of S.89°52 W on the South line of the SWI /4 of Section 35, as shown on the final plot of PLAT NO.4 OF WEST FARMS IRRIGATED TRACTS. Chord Bearing c 1 S c 2 S c 3 c 4 S c 5 N c 6 N c 7 N c 8 c 9 N cl0 N 011 S c12 S c13 S c14 c15 S 016 S c17 N c18 S c19 S C.20 S 21 08 34 14 45 00 77 06 36 57 59 00 22 41 51 45 06 49 44 53 11 Varies 00.20 10 23 23 35 57 50 51 35 49 51 45 42 01 Varies 45 0140 44582.0 7042 15 82 23 00 88 15 50 28 18 58 E ,a E E 0 ;DIAL BEARIN CURVE INFORMATION SHEET® 2 OF 2 1 N6401 59 E 2 N 45 29 19 E 3N 51 5649 4 S 51 16 29 E 5 S 53 22 55 E 6 N 38 08 56 E 7 N 21 53 30 W 8 N 22 21 27 W 9N684039E 10 S 60 56 56 W 11 S 76 09 48 W 12 S 66 29 58 14 13 N 64 12 12 E 14 N 77 12 12 E 15S641458W 16 S 71 36 22 14 17 S 79 56 12 W 18 S 88 32 37 W 19 S 54 47 30 E 20 N 54 54 10 E 21 N 25 47 48 W 22 S 44 30 41 E 149.32 016 42 12 514 °01 338 °47 029 30 00 664.70 282.98 025 47 48 633,86 329.24 064 01 59 310,51 229.04 045 34 57 295063 28.29 090 02 22 20.00 28.27 089 5738 20.00 28.28 090 00 00 20.00 24.84 076 46 42 20.00 28.1'4 089 25 31 20.00 21.25 064 11 38 20.00 32.45 108 26 58 20.00 27.91 088 29 18 20.00 18.42 054 50 50 20.00 28.3.0 090 03 20 20.00 28.27 089 56 40 20.00 26.58 083 18 23 20.00 28.66 091 31 51 20.00 17.48 003 28 21 288.51 20.33 002 22 03 492.01 Radius Arc 149,85 342,24 285.39 347.02 235.20 3143 31.40 31,42 26 °80 31.22 22.41 37.86 30.89 19.15 31 .44 31.40 29 "08 31,95 17.49 20.33 Tangent 75,40 175 °00 145.15 194 °15 124.22 20.01 19.99 20.00 15.85 19.80 12.54 27.76 19.48 10.38 20,02 19.98 17.79 20 °54 8.75 10 °17 /NL AND /3C /F /C EivG /NEER/NG ND CONS rRUC r iO N C:01-?Pa EAST /2720 /NORM AVENUE SPOKANE WA I ra : 5 1 A a L.c A • Y r, ,re. :A :A' ,tI� (' +..: .-. •-:. /t'!. .ui ` k "_ ( r :tom`• .y. t %a ..1 :s S F i. =iw... r INESEMEMEEMENNE u R13 �o. N om. ?"' �Ir "f. } EMblmEMENEEMEME 1 .. r - MENIMMEMEmEEM , NEEMENE ME .MMENEE 11:1 'IMEMEMINE.mMEMENIMEM lEmoiffliaramEnwre'llsWetlya ENE M ME EMEMENEEMMEEME "MEE l D Y'fjl.t W1 C6 . 1-, l'1)4, ) S}r 7 '3. 1r ToP o G st - -._ ,... .....;_,r _.. ._.:.. ::..tea ....._..: > ■r . Pry. k' 7 + jam l rj4 d 1 '. fi r+; C.Jt:�,: ` AN; � Ct1 T'T,~ l'l '- ' 1 l = ' , • , 1 h =r - , ? ? "s:"� -:, 'k''''.,-. '.t. r ;..:'t 170 , 7 a a (-;', e 1. -• ' 4...5 ltd p- t}: I IIMENNMEMEMINI= mean I N • E MEER .:41..imost. MESE mil= limmemon6%91116entwiffiammeni • MENEEMENEE r _ t =ME NIZIE NEEMENEMEIMEME 5.1 EMEME EMEMENIESIMEN NW MEE MEE IME Ell MENEEMBENEMEMEE Mi==EME MENNE _ CAAV 1t_ MEC Ell BY_ _�. F !-L E -S 1'73 N L ME 111. MEE • • 2, 895,000 E 2,890,000 • • :. .. .:::a .rv �:,n¢.p.5e .... Go dC 2.1 ,. k E3 , 2/‘ uri 34' t 1\5_C .C' , 4.84-4.?-1=.1". A ∎ci.- gL1 -7' �� • - 2O 0 R \ t' a . _ ° 25' , 'tom ,N 44 +7�. l Pc 0 X . t o4• T. 111.9' L.223.3' R.1432.5' 86+22.7 pT. 83 +99.4 P,C. 0 =1 OOE -AVE. RR 1 GATE 115 Lot 6 BL-X 1 1'w DE FARMS 13 256 1Z -9D X49.1' .3564.3 - O5O/ 112 35 6 - 04o/ 21-7-b g 9 to /414"2 t3 �4 hNE ROY AYE 2� 29 ZS 27 I CE S EP 121918 COUNTY SPOKAN pEPARTMENT PLANNIN NW. Pe- /toe - 7P 6 N R44E.W.M c, A i... -- 1 to - o© yg% o' C.R.P No.300 A43 °12'Lt, C.10°00 O� T 226.9 A�61 ° 52' L+. ■A o � (..432.0' ' � / C.50 °00' �� J .573.0T. 6�.Z! .§ ' y o 101 +60.9PT. �-'L�23.7'91 % . e g ? 9 +7 d C. 6 97 +28.9 P C. R. I I�+.�� d - - =- boo �'�! °oo P.C.97 +01,9 16 . } gyp g?I T . 251.2 T. 98 +25.6 2- 'e 9��L p�. 8.409.3 S89 ooW- 2241-0' - 93 +9�.3 Po.c P �.5 y , 0� - 33 °Z5' s G . , \ N ' 5 °47'w. a \ a C \ . 8 4 + z i_4,3 }99� ' .. �� 9s C- �6 °oo - - a \ <'a� °ate' �� , ..., -- c - - a4.�' c� _ - \ \ -- vi L- 166 k L , \ __ � BZ +53.3 Rc: , 2� % � , C.R.P. No.300 -j �R�,�' = 8E.+ (532 F T, C- t� °c 0 - 36° O 9' ' Z3. C.R.P. No.3Oo A 17 °22'Rt. C. 8°00' T 109.4' L.217.1' R. T 16.8' C.R•P No.300 4 63 It. c.7°30' T.476.O' L.851.3' R.'754.o' 8I +27.4PT. =81 +53.6 PT Revra 72499.6 P.C.C.= 13+02.3 PC.' LPR■ra. OF F1 GFAi.... PL / A. R. S COT T -E e IMEER- SPOK "NH E Cour BY _ Principal A9151st'c+nt. :Aco s ROAD -1 t7-W- 6O _:+it'3'1'.f`f'YS .Y{S.. > S.aVf t:. w a: -i"h' d •w'b . ....a 4. i < t'h'ksP. '� ff,�i' A•v,. r .• r.1+t� Fr. Fi'k!. "�"' � d m ti ti F....d' :y.f� n.: ,.r•� :.. $?.•.u.rx�f. i 3' .�Y:::a'•„g.... yrs .yrF ... .. .. I • �. .•1' •su7"�e xF •' u�!i : %s::�' ; :j.djl.nl��... ,5..:r:e ,' + %�;i' <'':"�i' � ;i�.'. ;: t � . ,i :�i %tf < Y; ;7- r • % : °••f aSwF. •. x�. ..ni� ;,; - 1 +:r . �•yt{��'r *r.:`er.::l SUPERfOR REPROGi0111 TII -344 • ` truction ' rid 98? d . Stan o;' iss Tarrers, :'Resa1uz on 3.i bta' Tied from the $ookane- Cou Surmiie� tie d E Lst Standard Strut and tarm Drainage Det '7 ' e , it or panying ` -p1a i .streets s `be considered supplemental to tire. aunty Road .'Stand rd. aid are rt ni d to depict;: spec'? a1; constr uc `ran b 7 s wf � ch '.are h q! t rid for• '—u 1 ,1 ane ti� the County's "2O8� : : rvgram: nese plans sha i fi tse cons={ der Lo be hernat? c and?.'are `ncrt i n:w ded tcr o tt�e rritdntfite fns. nd egiap�nen ;::wii.�`ch`in.y .be regta� red l e ict a details o:f labor iater1als a A , P The plan sheets:;: S1i er'field East standard :Street anct Sto Drainage peLai is acrd the :Spok:arl3, Ci trrity; Road >tandar(k shall ce t ons1dri - 1 nxt teed tbgethet rinyth ng nr» firing as; eq�r ,cement cif iany one ofz the aoo rep er enrecI documents: sha . 1 be acce t i �s i np l 1 cable to all - dac ts. even tt►ofr nit sn sated th 2r' vi ar s rr w • n the ca 'e off ' - dott i.� a orris Dra�:nage< .D .ai;t ';and tt" County\Rbad atanoards, the Sur rer field Last standard „D, tc is shaft : c verf /0" 0/?YI✓FLL ` CONNECT/OA/ EXPANS /ON. JO/NrS DELETE.. PM/WAGE .: 5WALE ..:; • $TA 0f00. ; 34/1:/0: • • 1b ` W IDE : UT /G`I7`:Y' ::DRA/M4GE:: ;FSMT CURB c/l -IEEE . diAIR TYP /C,4 L L✓IEEL . C/- W4 /,P Z4 CONT /G/JPA T/ON USE ,WHEN DRAINAGE .S144LE F[01./ :/s INTERCEPTER N75 By DR4 /NAGE S1 TIRES ' n tTa^1`Y pf_ r �. ;ti d. ,.s „z } , ^ t ° • p �fiY f� 1 . '?� pp rg ;Q�` . •x�i. ..:�... �. �.. `F -;ek:. r•'•: " ^: �.r..-a . y:4�.:: r :.. a'- r• y „ .. k- . yam Ftl . • M :r•6.5i ..! . . : v <.'„ r `' i } � •vi' < i, •. . 1 11 _ w,l,` i YF µ < x 4 : • .',s �'g. %3� ° �i `l ` 7(1i ' .k rr.�ii�!i . ;:'IGf ` t.`� vl:.�. `,L,',�: �... ..( rr: '* _ b' fr.. - .X ' f :1 l.Y- - 33 �� :l F KY'. yx •. r a• V• "P<�1+ • � i r n { � ' �.:' �,�,. •y " . y _ _ l •.' L ti. y` •f F:Cr f ..r.+' J S %`'�) i } i . ..M °.'i” .: S :..::� s ., a. : r <. ... S . .. ..x .,, a....f,� a .�. :, ... .tti .. : •ah• a• .1t .:.., , '. r �, �i < ,�;3 i2zfi?r+'.<`a:� a -. t.�.�Fa: +�F'sk ..l i- d.:.4..•na^T '�e. •..+.»:'Fn ^,.i.. .e • ..a.. .. , ._ '`r!� . Z+ Y% "s .�G!" •"'1f� ,.i ... ... .. ass ,., uS^' 4, s ..f� Y ., �.Y, �:�.�., �.�,ak �w ,. , _ ,` � r �'� u.. ,.e.+ r'... . ,�:hr"• .�'� :�" ...i�?c'° ..��fi 3 ' : Vie' �� s C r s W' G ASPHALT:: C9NCRETE:.:O:M ;..: CRIISEO::ROGK ; TOf' C OURSE 5 I PEWALK 4/I/EEL C/4 IR K'AM P lag, ORAD/AIG' OF QRA /NAGE 31,JALE _72> f MA TCN INVERT OF CULVERT AND PRaV /DE Pos i r/vE DRAVA46E W/TUOUT PU,DDLING s SECT /ON DR LL 6 -B CONNECT ION P /PE INSIDE THE CULVERT 4 ' • f)P. f f n .. r %p, 7YP /C4L 4.. BAR USE N DRAINAGE /S TO P4_..5 UNDUNDER RAMP Nr.S LIW CONSTRUCTION OF'.14PEEL CHAIR RAMP, CULVERT AND NEAD14dL4S TO OCCUR CONCUR'REHT ! -1 /1 CURB COAISTRI/CT /OA/: . l- IEADLJALL SEE DET 4. /G) 'r CJL VEP 7 \ ASrM 3034 Pvc TARP GRADING OF DRA /NAGE SivALE TO MATC14 1NVERT.or CULVERT AND PROV /UE. POSS/ T/V DRA /NAGE h/ /TNour PUDDL ING /NS /DE THE CIJLVEfeT C) LOT 4 , BLOCK /' wide strip - ~ � / SW COR SEC 35 4i- 3543 , Fnd. 3/4"1.P. Fits three R.P.'s of record Tk in T. Pole N 50E,38.77' Tk. in P Pole S.50 W, 37.2 "X' on face of Stand pipe S40E,4667' 1983.19 ( m o I-1 I N h im i0 10 I Z 6-7 c. 55.26 89°54' 22" E 25.6 N89 ° 54' 22 "E 135.04 N89 °54' 22 "E 134.9 N89 °54' 22 "E 134.78 0 25 0 m p, m N89 °54' 22 "E 134.65 N89 °54' 22 "E 134.51 134.38 N89 °54' 22 "E /0' WIDE WALKWAY N89 °54' 22 "E 134.36 N89 °54' 22 "E 134.22 N89 °54' 22 "E 134.09 N89 °54' 22 "E 133.96 N89 °54' 22 "E 133.83 N89 ° 54' 22 "E 133.70 35.15 44.85 93.72 S90°00' 00" E 469. 10 73.77 80.00 80.00 80.00 85.00 BLOCK 6 80.00 . N90 °00' 00 "W 324.85 90.00 94.00 80.00 AVENUE 90.00 90.00 9 0.00 N 90° 00' 00" W 700.00 68.51 93.19 97.45 36.79 N90°00' 00" E 133.00 M N90 ° 00' 00 "E 133.00 133.00 N90 ° 00' 00 "E 133.00 N90 °00' 00 "E /0' W /DE WALKWAY N90 ° 00' 00 "E 133.00 N90 ° 00' 00 "E 133.00 N90 ° 00' 00 "E 133.00 N90 ° 00' 00 "E 133.00 91.01 0 12 m 0 0 0 BLOCK I 88.42 88.42 t6 77.90 88.42 N89 ° 56' 40 "W SUMMERF /ELD 335.00 77.83 88.42 97.73 _ 88.42 N89°56' 40" W 103.10 16 rg 78.40 88. 73.48 WABASH N 89 °56' 40 " W CGUR C' m 335.00 88.42 35.00 375.09 S 89° 56' 40" E 35.00 0 N O O_ Mo m O O 0 LOT2,`BLOCi; / wide str /p / ' S 44.26 148.70 N89 °56' 40 "W 146.41 cl' 89° 56' 40"W 89.86(R) 1189° 56' 40"W 29.50 30.00 0 0 0 t0 co l0 N N m N CO L0 N 2644 24 2644.20 (Record) 0 m d . Fnd 5/8" rebar as per Record of Survey, Auditors No.7902210192 in Survey Book 18, Page 5 N N4 3/ � S 0/ 9 LOT /2 , BLOCK 6 wide str /p CO 00.- 1. cit 0,2' 1 2 113.55 113.55 N89 ° 54' 22 "E 133.55 2 133.55 3 N89 °54' 22 "E 133.55 4 N89 ° 54' 22 "E 33.55 5 N89 ° 54' 22 "E Y 133.55 0 m 6 N89 °54' 22 "E 133.55 7 N89 ° 54' 22 "E 133.55 8 N89 ° 54' 22 "E 133.55 9 N89 ° 54' 22 "E 133.55 1 10 23 .60 0 N 10 N 40 N m :n CO 40 N L0 N m N m T r[ / T 1 4 / ,') ' r) / r r V / ✓r a) 0 0 m 22' a) u7 0 m m m a, 0 0 0 2 c 1 113.56 1 �� S 89° 52' OO' 155.55 BASIS OF BEARINGS \ V 0 I 113.53 311.10 155.50 O M O m 0 cr 0 0 0 0 O °00 m O m N89 °52' 00 "E 0 to /_ )(' / n f- •` �/ 1 . / 7 / - 1/ L/✓ „n .rl�J ,r (1 l,' 350.00 WEL L ESL EY n 1 13 „ 1 31.56 3 . SI /4 CORNER SEC 35 / * 3544, Fnd. 2' Pipe w/ Wire in Mon. Case 77 ,--- Fits three R.P.'s of record Tk. T.PoleS40E, 41.98' ; 7C'on Curb N45 °E,55.60' / X'on Curb N 40°W, 60.32 ' 350.00 AVENUE !l /r', /� 1 L c 5' - -- - - - - -- I( 1 1 " / r r) /l / V ( ✓ 1 G SUMMERFIELD BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE SI/2 OF SEC. 35, T.26N.,R.44E.W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AUG L ST 1979 N • m O a' O 0 M 112.98 1' ) 1 � 1 78.00 N 89° 56' 40" W 274.98 ll 155.00 u 119.95 5E39° 56' 40" E (') S 89° 56 36.43 36.43 3 0 N O m� O N o 0 0 to 5 54.44 5 - LOT 3, BLOCK /'wide strip 3 0 t11 mm O N O 0 N 0 mm O • - ' 0 t!1 - - - -- r - - 1 1 v 1 FINAL PLAT of EAST ADDITION m 2 6 3 .19 18 85.00 144.62 N 89° 56' 40"W 342.67 Scale I = 100' 0 87.80(R) ti 17 2638.43 0 O 0 \ 30.00 ( V V EP a) N 0 0 0 U1 SE COR" SEC 35 -26 -44 # 3545, Fnd. Bross Cop in Mon. Case. Fits one remaining R.P. of record, Tk in P Pole NE, 53.3 C`' Set two new R P's: Tk. in Guy Pole N46 ° W, 47.24' Tic In P. Pole S 50 E, 52.63 LEGEND • Fnd. Points (5 /8"rebar,except as noted) O Set 1/2" rebar at angle points in bdry. Q Set 1/2" rebar as Q monuments 1- Set I/2 " rebar at all lot corners NOTE Front lot corners and € monuments to be set after utilities ore into / /ed NOTE: The Basis of Bearings for this map is the bearing of S.89°52 00" W on the South line of the SWI /4 of Section 35, as shown on the final plat of PLAT NO.4 OF WEST FARMS IRRIGATED TRACTS. c 1 S 21 08 c 2 S 14 45 c 3 S 77 06 cc4S5759 c5N2241 c 6 N 45 06 c 7 N 44 53 c 8 Varies c 9 N 00 20 c10 N 23 23 cli S 57 50 c12 S 35 49 c13 S 45 42 c14 Varies c15S4501 c16S4458 c17N7042 c18S8223 C--.12-:90 19 S 8t3 1 C.20 S 28 34 0() 01 00 51 49 11 10 33 51 51 01 40 20 15 00 50 5O E E E E E E E E w E t ^7 E w w E E Chord 149.32 338.47 282.98 329.24 229.04 28.29 28.27 28.28 24.84 28.14 21.25 32.45 27.91 18,42 28.30 28.27 26.58 28.66 17.48 20.33 O RADIAL BEARINGS() 1 N 64 2 N 45 3 N 51 4 S 51 5 S 53 6 N 38 7 N 21 8 N 22 9 N 68 10 S 60 11 S 76 12 S 66 13 N 64 14 N 77 15 S 64 16 S 71 17 S 79 18 S 88 19 S 54 20 N 54 21 N 25 22 S 44 CURVE INFORMATION SHEET 2 OF 2 01 29 56 16 22 08 53 21 40 56 09 29 12 12 14 36 56 32 47 54 47 30 59 E 19 E 49 E 29 E 55 E 56 E 30 W 27 W 39 E 56 W 48 W 58 W 12 E 12 E 58 W 22 14 12 W 37 W 30 E 10 E 48 W 41 E Delta Radius Arc Tangent 016 42 12 514.01 149.85 75.46 029 30 00 664.70 342.24 175.00 025 47 48 633.86 285.39 145.15 064 01 59 310.51 347.02 194.15 045 34 57 295,63 235.20 124.22 090 02 22 20,00 31.43 20.01 089 57 38 20.00 31,40 19,99 090 00 00 20.00 31.42 20.00 076 46 42 20.00 26.80 15.85 089 25 31 20.00 3122 19.80 064 11 38 20,00 2. 2 ,41 12.54 108 26 58 20,00 37.86 27.76 088 29 18 20.00 30.89 19.48 054 50 50 20.00 19.15 10.38 090 03 20 20.00 31.44 20.02 089 56 40 20,00 31.40 19.98 083 18 23 20,00 29,03 17.79 091 31 51 20.00 31,95 20.54 003 28 21 288.51 17.49 8,75 002 22 03 492.01 20,33 10.17 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CORPORA T /ON EAST /2720 NORA AVENUE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON A 20250 to 2024.21 • 20157 • 2 02 $2O2777 2050.40 a2020 2046.31 ��� o ✓-" -- 2 0 a 0 � : =J L =a = 2027. �--- - O C:2) =I n CZ • 0 I L _L PQ d Cf O -2030 .! — `- 2028 7 caF=1-7n Cj c. 1 tT 0 3 o ■ 20350 .20271 •. 0330_ V , c(L C LIJ II ,- 2037.81 ,_ I1 II • .- - O `V nEcEntED APR, 191993 coati Eiziuosriiia 1 APR 1 1993 County Eninoo,�„ oa FIVE 4 .,. t. _ ot.rt�w \ . 2037 4.110 • 0 /00.11 $A 20 BLOCK EIGHT 4 sc s • (0 2 oC 1 ffi 1 iea: ail vnm 4. 8 � • 3 BLOCK us, 00 -- BL ( TWELVE U ?.9 2025 0 1 v2024.2 a 20251 • 20 ?6.4 c MEOW 20 " W/OF 1 2020.7 L-Eh 2027 X • 2L ' 1-04WIOF _ 046..33 APR 1 1993 County Eninoo,�„ oa FIVE 4 .,. t. _ ot.rt�w \ . 2037 4.110 • 0 /00.11 $A 20 BLOCK EIGHT 4 sc s • (0 2 oC 1 ffi 1 iea: ail vnm 4. 8 � • 3 BLOCK us, 00 -- BL ( TWELVE U ?.9 2025 0 1 v2024.2 a 20251 • 20 ?6.4 c MEOW 20 " W/OF 1 2020.7 L-Eh 2027 X • 2L ' 1-04WIOF _ 046..33 66 o' N.B ? °SZE 30' 34 - • / yv � as s6 5 30 60o' }sy wOEfih ATE L ; 17. 20 DPE ' f 1 i...3F • $POKA CI) TY •ASSESS R .,4 co c L. al't ,R. 4/1. C.R.P No.3OO ,443 C. 10 °00' l' 226.9 L.432.0 R..573.0' 101.0 0 9 PT. 97 +289PC. 0 . 6 ?/‘ A +. C. 5o °00' /'T. 6x.7.1 -5433-5 ft. 1 14.6 : P.C.97 +01.9 P•T. 98415.6'- z 589 93 +9�.3 P.o.c 22G8.G3' PO.S.T.93 +59.37 .. (C.R.P NO3oo) 'l' �Q i - nj a 0 •A - J3 °26' Z_ �-r -216.0 ' CI_- 874- 77.1 14 5 ° 47 w Z -F vi \ Es4- Z i 4,7T .'66\\26_3.5' P ' �CA1_E a'- P =40OR LSO e 12-F- 2.583 C:3 p. ISi1:7•1'%_� �� Vilc , N -z3;G 1 1 G 3 21 . 7 1 + ZO°OO R � _ N ....777!"25' _� m T- Z 3 0.7 e- -(229. C. '0 is' 44 +79.' PC. 0 104 4 O °O7'L 21 +C3.3 Ai •R, K E R `N 89 A C.R.P. Nc.30o � d 8 °5G'L +, = _.4 • C.4° Oo' `(' 111.9� � L.223.3 • R.1432.5 86 +22.7 PT. 83 +99.4 PC,:. 9 4 9. 1 Lae LI22 L1381 1 C.R.P No.300 n; d 6 3 ° 51'Lt. U C.T °3O 1:476.0 / L.851.3' 8.754 i 81 +27.4 PT. =81 +53.6 PTRwn. /+ 7 S _ 3 72+99.6 P•C.0 z ?3 +02.3 PC, Q 1.PRwra. 111W. O FT4tt. , (- , disp.Abw,. 71MTIMEI :: vummaini B §6-lerari sc,4__ „ . . gni il a 34 .i 1 CT ma. al 50 ailiffialli 'j 19 LW �:L�r�.� Illr 1 Milia VI ;T ! 4 26 25 35 36 C.R.P. No.3O0 d 17 °22'Rt. C. 8 °oO' T. 109.4' L. 2I7.1'� 16.8 O F F l G,t' l `r. �, PLAT A . R.5 CQTT - I l EER,-•POKANE COUNTY. Princi c I As erant. 12 :s 1 so r cD 0 1,1,64ex pi — 2_ 44J-L- I1F1' kw 203- sormalmt,_ V..** moor \P 2 1 4r 0 . p f ,J. v_61_,1_,.e/,21_,q /--N\). ____.__________.________._____ ___._ -- _____ e}1 0 r • ; e z otko_ie,2 1'e-L-61 y T • 6Irsitci 6 \\). )3$2 0 0.L14g.-162 rDJ PREL/MINARY PLAT OF SUMMERREL0 EAST 20'WI LOCATED IN SEC . 35, T 2 6 N., R. 4 4 E.W M. SPOKANE COUNT Y,WASHINGTON = 2-0 c' 1 fe-Az-J rtg.-Ar Lc7D. *A'a ° kiiiiik4/1 A!j NJ Ges N AJfZ \ - — • 9' 2 - 3c).0 / g_tJz 4 tc. i 1 0 1 -1.- o- 2- Z G . 1 e-•,6• . I_.. LAO f I *I-- 4- g . 1‘ 1 ' (' 10 (Doc -.6Z, - ef. ) s L....cy-r A..e.e.... -rg4-e_,-r- 1 p--c-r-e. -fy 12 ito. L, L.,of l 'iz-c)t , i-fA-r..1.- sc,i f 7 1' , L- ,t).-z-.e.e, e7 FL-P.- 3 1 , , / cD 0 1,1,64ex pi — 2_ 44J-L- I1F1' kw 203- sormalmt,_ V..** moor \P 2 1 4r 0 . p f ,J. v_61_,1_,.e/,21_,q /--N\). ____.__________.________._____ ___._ -- _____ e}1 0 r • ; e z otko_ie,2 1'e-L-61 y T • 6Irsitci 6 \\). )3$2 0 0.L14g.-162 rDJ PREL/MINARY PLAT OF SUMMERREL0 EAST 20'WI LOCATED IN SEC . 35, T 2 6 N., R. 4 4 E.W M. SPOKANE COUNT Y,WASHINGTON = 2-0 c' 1 fe-Az-J rtg.-Ar Lc7D. *A'a ° kiiiiik4/1 A!j NJ Ges N AJfZ \ - — • 9' 2 - 3c).0 / g_tJz 4 tc. i 1 0 a F EitL ; WIDE . 203 7 <4. "%/". \ . . : .. • ' \ .(- . ) \ \ A ,.-- . . .. \ \ -.. o \ • . ' s N..,.._ \ \ , \ \ "Z..... \ \ \ \ `---;. \ cs o \ .. \ .., , \ \'' \ ,. \ \(,-"\\,, \ \ . -.. \-..., \ \ : a rJJfrl - St_ 1 12_ till RO ■ 19 is /7 16 /5 • /4 a F EitL ; WIDE . 203 7 <4. "%/". \ . . : .. • ' \ .(- . ) \ \ A ,.-- . . .. \ \ -.. o \ • . ' s N..,.._ \ \ , \ \ "Z..... \ \ \ \ `---;. \ cs o \ .. \ .., , \ \'' \ ,. \ \(,-"\\,, \ \ . -.. \-..., \ \ : a rJJfrl DELETE DRAINAGE SWALE STA. 1011.0S TO STA. 12486 3 6' UTILITY ESMT. CONC. SIDEWALK TYPE "B" CONC_ CURB SIDEWALK" TEMPORARY ROCK SUMP TO BE USED AT END OF STUB STREETS NHE4 T-IE STREET END OCCURS AT AIN INTERVAL 1A114ICI-1 WOULD NOT REQUIRE A PERMANT DRAINAGE STRUCTLIRE IF THE STREET AS A 1,11-10LE WERE CONSIDERED, OR 14N EROSION DAMAGE WOULD BE INACCEPTABLE ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES. I IWW MMMMMMMMMM .............. WELLESLEY AVE. 5' 15 CLASS IS ASPHALT CEMENT HAVING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT CONTENT, ON 4" CRUSHED 12.0C1/-. TOP COURSE IN ACCORDANCE N4 IALS.D.O.T SPECIFICA.T1014S. 5' DA. TYPE °A" CONC. CURB PLAT BOUNDARY SUMMERFIELD EAS7 FIRST ADDIT ION I" TO 3" WASI-IED NATUIRAL GRAVEL BERM DETAIL NTS NOTE: A I (ONE) FOOT 1-11614 BERM IS TO BE CONSTRUCT ED ALONG TI4E NORTH ANID EAST PLAT BOUNDARIE5.*) OF SUMME.RFIELD EAST Ic• ADDITION 2" CLASS B ASPHALT CEMENT PAVING 53/ % TO ( Y4 % ASPHALT CONTENT, ON 4" CRUSHED ROCK.. TOP COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WI T-4 D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. 0" CLASS B ASP14ALT CEMENT HAVING 5 3 /4 % TO 6 1/4 ` ASPIAALT CON TEN T., ON 4" CRUSH ED ROCK. TOP COURSE IN ACCORDANCE W TH D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. 3 4, 10' TURFED DRAINAGE SWALE CONCRETE CURB ZI IN AREAS WITI4OL.IT SIDEWALKS 4' (t.1 AREAS 1,11T 5ID WALKS TOP OF CURB ru-u-aus ( -- - tYPE "A" CONC.CURB roQ. LOW SPOTS VIDTIA VARIES IN DRIVE NAYs CONCRE.TE SIDEWALY._ DROP DRAINAGE SWALE CONCRETE CURB 2' IN AREAS WITLOUT SIDEWALKS 4' IM AREAS SIDEWALKS DRYWELL GUTTER. LINE_ 5" CONCRETE. FOR WIDTH OF RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY _J. 5" CONCRETE FOR WIDTI-I OF RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY FLOW IN SWALE • All construction 1981 Spokane Cou Commissioners in obtained from th 2. The "Summerfield Details" shown o supplemental to special construc County's "208" p methods and materials shall be in accordance with the nty Road Standards as adopted by the Board of County Resolution No. 80-1592. i Sa4 f R c o :. d Standards can be e Spokane County Engineer s East First Addi n the accowpanyi the County Road tion details whi rogram. 3. These plans shall be considered to be schematic and are not intended to ll depict a details of labor, materials and equipment which may be required to accomplish the intent of the plans. The plan sheets, Summerfield East First Addition Standard Street and Storm Drainage Details, and the Spokane cowl Y Road Standards shall be considered and used together. Anything appearing as a requirement of any one of the above referenced documents shall be accepted as applicable to all documents even thou h not so stated therein or shown. In the case of conflict between the Suffmerfield East First Addition Standard Street and Storm Drainage Details aid the County Road Standards, the Summerfield East First Addition Stanpard Details shall govern. 4. • Street signs shall be Spokane County Standard and shall be installed as specified in the Manual nf Uniform Traffic Control Devices. A stop sign and road name sign shall be installed at the intersection of Burns and Wellesle UTILIT Y AND DRAINAGE ESMT. O 011 STREETS WIO SIDEWALK Li ou CULDESACS 48" SQ TRANSFORMER PAD LOCATION ON STREETS WITHOUT SIDE WALI:S .._1 CUR DROP-- (.__ 6 CONCRETE SIDE LK WHERE INE)ICATED ,I PLAI•IS .6 6 — ou DROP—. l tion Standard Street and Storm Drainage ng plan sheets shall be considered Standards and are intended to depict ch are required for compliance-with the a' SIDEWALK 48" SQ TRANSFORMER PAD LOCATION ON STREETS 14 ITH SIDE WALKS ( 1/4 BOTTOM OV SWALE CONCRETE CUM CONCRETE CURB DRAINAGE SWALE SUPERIOR REPROGRAPHICS TB-344 SHEET 40 OF 13 JOB No. 84029 w w 0 C3 CL > 0 0 0 0 a 0 z 0 z csi LEFT 20 2030 RIG4 -1T 203 Abadan in, 888 -448 5 -83 CD 18 19 SUMMERFIELD EAST FIRST ADDITION TBM- R.R. SPIKE N P.P. S.W. CORNER EVER&IZEEN t4ELLI =SL>=Y ELEV.= 2023.75 COUNT \/ DATUM t VG „7 O Z CO 60' 40' 2 12 +00 m RETURN o= 89 °54.'40" R= 20.00 L= 31.40 T= 19.g8 CI 28.27 ECR 2027.83 MGR 27.91 BCR 2027.81 - - 75.00 BCR - � 2027.81 : MC Q 28.12 04� ECR a< 2028.43 o(n_ 1 RETURN & =90 °03 " R= 20.00 La 31.44 T= 20.02 c= 28.30 - .008 22 - .00800 I2 13 tp W l9 13 +22.55 13 - .0 .. .... .. Z 4 a. L1NP L A TTED CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY ROCK SUMP. SEE DETAIL SHEET 6 OF 13. BROAD AVE. k189° 56'40" W ..... ............................... ........................ rl P E1%; 1.4C.)( D a L. i_ ^it Er N "17^. .rte. I' LEFT e0 .; EXISTING WELLESLE PLAT BOUNDARY I0 0 3 0 O x 0 0 EC 1Z E 2029.35 MCR 29. 40 13C R 1/49 202925 - - 104.98 - - +.00140 O 0 0- N RETURN L=90°03'20" R= 20.00 L= 31 .44 T= 20.02 C= 28.30 SIDEWALK WELLESLEY AVENUE - EXISTING N 8 1° 56'40" W +II. PAVING ± : 00 Li oo . .... +.00539 O 0 O ti O SUMMERFIELD EAST FIRST ADDITION 0 0 - O +.003((0 . *:00073 + A /00' 11 +64.04 .. ............................... I I 12 I-: u.3 2029.3 5 >' r MGR - 29.1/0 R D B CR 2028.98 ` - 70.00 -L ECR RETURN L,= 89 ° 56'40" R= 20 00 L =3I.40 T =19.98 C= 28.27 I ti SIOEWAI. SEC 35, T. ...- . 00178: .0056.0 .. ..... ........ .................... ....... ... ............................ It O Q - LA LA In _ 9 tr .4 N O.'! 4 r -0 " 5a ± N O T. 0 t O N N'N N N 12.1-i36) ............ - .0.058 CC 4 3 to J a PLAT BOUNDARY SEC. 2 , T. 25 N. R 49 E. W. M . ................................................... .. 0 a 0 N UN PLATTED 26N, R E. W M SEC. 35 T. 2LIN 2.44 E.W.M. .......................... .......................... ............... ........ .........................:..... ........ .............................. w I- a O to w J N a CC U 0 (I) 0 a 4 ,n1 ........ ............................... 0 I- cc w z cc 0 PROJECT NO. !` 84029 SHEET NO. 2O F 13 I- 0 ics 0 Z W a 0 >- U, 0 Cte V Z 0 0 0 o � 0 '" u 0 Z N CO Abo'.do,n 888 -448 5 -83 SUMMEQFIELD EAST FIRST ADDITION ... ............................... TeM- Q.R. SPIKE IN P. P S.W. CO2NEQ EVE12CG12FEN WELLE -5 LEY ELEV. = >2OZ3.75 COUNTY ; DATUM ....... ............................... ...... ............................... .0 12 0 40' 60' N ` 0 ' 0 0. N• RETURN A= 89 °5(0`40 CZ= 20.00 L- 31 . - r= Iq.98 C= 28.27 c 2ETU12N p= q0 °03'20" R 20.00 L= 31.44 T-- 20.02 C= 28,30 N k N 0 N 1 + 0 - 69.82 - BCR 2026.76 MGR E CR .9 b 2020.9 oo co 0 co c11.. - Cs) EC 12' 2027.0(9 MCR 27.16 BC{R 2026.76 12 - -69.91 - - cows. cuRe 4 ;iJ, °56'40 "14 DROP, STA 3 +08 � 3/ , i4 • I� 1N 3 / SUMMRFIELD COURT itta 13 IE OUT 22 .44 Z1 TOP CRAT E LEV-2045.78 3tA...... ..0 -.00800 TQP:GRATE EL. Elk= 2025.78 .5TA. :...1.3 +20' N + 03 O 4 N 0 1 * ' 150 CONST. TYPE "B" DRY WELL W/ METAL FRAME GRATE TYPE 3 • 0 VG N 0 N O 0 N 'VC N 0 h 0 (Si 0 a0 O (Si 150' VG SUMMEIZFIELD EAST FIRST aDDIT ION 13 14 CONST. TYPE "g" ORYWELL W j GRTETYPE 3 - 87.00 - -- - 87.00 --- 0 .0)2425 cf1 O ( Si 0 0 9 00 9 N �- 13 14. 0 + 01.2405 RETURR L= 54°13'27" 1 Z= 20.00 L= 18.93 T- 10.24 C= 1 8.23 -74.52 - - ETUCZN• Al 54 °)3'27" 12= 20.00 L= 18.93 T= 10.24. C= 18.23 19 (Si 0 O co 0 h t� N 0 c N + 0 d' • N 15 15 +35 + 0 15 74.57 L. 74.62 18 In m t N n m 4 N 15 0 (Si y W 2 w It s 10' DRAINAGE SWALE 17 050 co: lV - 0 0:+ + N0 (Si N; +.008'O0 0 m m N 100' VG - .00800 u U C N N CO 0 CO 0 N SEC. 35 T. 2.47N. . ................ ...................................... W F- Q z 0 0) W cc O Sn w J N • CC U 0 U) " I- 8r w tn Q W Li LU J N 1i 0 �1 z cc A C CV c O O o) CNI >O.. E O c a) E _ • � ' a) 11.1 4 E V E as 0 T a i, 1 1 ) "0 NCr) C E co S 0) 0 0 LO w w I- U) PROJECT NO. 84029 SHEET NO. 3 oF 13 0 00 w w Y U w _ U 0 wa o v a < ce 0 z m 0 m tin Cid O z co ........:........................... ............................... 20 20 LEFT 203 RIGHT .Abadan 888 -448 5 -83 SUMMERFIELD EAST FIRST ADDITION TBM - R.R. SP11LE 11\1 P. P S.W. CORNER EVERGREE1y WELLESLEY ELEV.= COUNTY DATUM 12 z ot m Ot 0 z N 12 +00 CONST. SWALE In DAM 20' 60' RETURN A. 88° 29'02" R- `20.00 L. ;30.89 T= '19.48 C = 27.91 O EC R 2028.07 MC R 28.18 BCIZ 2028.30 - 70.1I - 70.09 - -- BC MCR 2028.30 27.91 EC 202 7. I 52 i I2ETURN 90 °03'20' R. 20.00 L= 31.44 T= 20.02. C-- 28.30 13 12 13 ?OP OF GRATE ELEV :2427 75 STA (2+50 SUMMERFIELD EAST FIRST AMD I7 ION � (O' WIDE DRAINAGE SWALE 87.00 N 89 °54' 40 ",kJ 10.1A13AS1-1 COURT -- 87.00 X10' WIDE DRAINAGE SWALE 10 CONST. TYPE "B" DRYWELL W/ METAL FRAME GRATE TYPE 3 O.I..Z.o..0 4 RETURN L 54° I3'27" R. 20.00 L� 18.93 T 10.24 C= 18 .23 --- 74.25 - - 74.25 - - 9 RETURN h 54°13'27" R. 20.00 L= 15.93 T= 10.24 C. 18.23 0 0 N 14 15 1.0200.0 L= 74.4,3"" 8 .................................... ................. ........ .............................. 2030 ....................................... .. ............................... ....... ............................... CUL — D 100' VC S . NOT !.FY 4 b K.tOR To SEC. 35,T.2hN. R.44E.W.M. W H o d . 0 OC 4 W • • .. Z J N Y (1.1 v O w i a u) Z > D U tri >+ C N C O CV m N E 0 as co N c � . i Y 0 cu LU U E • • cO U 0 +.. Lo 1.0 "0 N co C tC 3'0 CU W ovJ cc cc i— . U) PROJECT NO. 84029 SHEET NO. Lf OF 13 4 tn ...... ..... ................ ....... .:. c l� l I- CT 1 I rn �. (0 4 I� Cr lr' CT SW COR SEC 35-26 -44 3543 Fnd'3 /4" LP. 80.00' 80.00 635 = Fds thre a R.P.'s of record Tk m T:PoIe N 50E,38.77' Tk.in PPo1e S.50W,372 "eon face of stand pipe S40E,46 67' 1983.19 2644.24 2644.20 (Record BLOCK'S" wide strip S 23 cOZ L ot. 113.55 WABASH N 89° 54 -22 "E 55.5 AVENUE N89°54' 22" E 133.55 N89 °54' 22' E 133.55 N89°54' 22 "E 133.55 N89 °54' 22 "E 133.55 N89 °54' 22 "E 133.55 N89 °54' 22 ".E 133.55 N89 °54'22 "E' 133.55. N89 22" E 133.55 N 89° 34' -22" E • 133.55 20' W /DE WALKWAY c'i8 -: N89°54' 22" E 35.04 N89°54' 2"E 134.91 1489 °54':22 "E 134.78 N89°54' 22 "E 134.65 N89°54' 22 ":E 134.51 134.38 N89°54' 22" E N89 °54' 22 "E 134.35 N89°54' 22" E 134.22 N89°54' 22' E 134.09 N89°54' 22" E 133.96 N89°54' 22" E o_ 00 .. to 0 113.56 IC? '. ". l 113.53 ' 589°52' 00' W 311.10 0 155.55 U 155.50 __. 845/5 OF BEAR /NGS N 89° 52' 00" E o 35.15 44.85 85.00 93.72 OLYMPIC N90°00' 00" Uf 324.85 85.00 AVENUE 85.00 73.48.; 93.19 AVENUE SI /4 CORNER SEC 35-26 - 44 ,fl 3544, Fnd. 2' Pipe w/ Wire in Mon. Case Fits three R.P.'s of record Tk. inTPoleS ' N . 40 E, 41.98 Curb 45 °E 55 60' *X'on Curb N40 °W, 60.32' BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE SI /2 OF SEC.35, T.26N.,R.44E.WM. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AUGUST 1979 N90 °00' 00'E 133.00 N90 °00'00 "E: 133.00 N90°00' 00 "E 133.00 20' WIDE WALKWAY N90°00' 00" E 133.00 N90°00' 00" E 133.00 N90°00' 00" E 133.00 N90 00 "E 133.00 N90 ° 00' 00 " 1.33.00 S89 ° 56'40'E • 36.43 36.43 052 2�'lR. _..� oa �° o U co m 133.00 N90 °00' 00 "E ! l OLVMP /C N 5 36 , 4 AAS N 89° 56' 40 ".W N 136.04 N ` - BLOCK L AVENUE N . � /' wide strip 91.01 I if 1 V //', i ce' ( /grin �/c /,te cc, i I7 85.37 p N89°56' "40' W 108.84 82.9 9 - OAD - N8• °. 6' 40 "W 122.55 „ VENUE 0.) 98.00 77.90 112.98 / 78.00 T N89°56' 40" W 274.98 O 350.00 =--�J 155.00' 119.95 0 rn N B9° 56' 40"W 0 .: "0 N89 °56'40 "W 88.42 88.42 oo � r`nn° _ 0 Ul BLOCK "E' • /' wide strip N °+7'44 " W 4.26 88.42 s 89 56' 40 " E 88.42 88.42 88.42 85.00 85.00 CP t3 78.40 88.42 1 72.48 0 WABASH °-° N 89 56' 40"W COURT C - co 335.00 72.48 N89°56' 40" W ' 'N89°56' 40" W 85.00 72.75 m N 89° 56' 40" W 342.67 N89°56' 40 "W 144.62 2638.43 LEGEND Fnd Points (5/8 "rebar, except as noted) 0 Set 1/2" rebar at angle points in bdry. O Set 1/2" rebar as monuments T- Set I/2" rebar at all lot corners NOTE- Front lot corners and € monuments to be set after utilities are installed NOTE: The Basis of Bearings for this map is the Scale 1 " = 100' bearing of S.89°52'00" W on the South line of. ?he SWI /4 of Section 35, as shown on the final plat of PLAT NO.4 OF WEST FARMS IRRIGATED TRACTS. 1 ' 3 N89 ° 56'40 "W 0 87.80(R) SE COR SEC 35 # 3545, Fnd. Bross Cap in Mon. Case Fits one remaining R.P. of record, Tk ; n P. Pole NE, 53.30' Set two new R.P.'s: Tk. in Guy Pole N46 °W, 47.24' Tk in P. Pole S 50 E, 52.63 Chord Bearing c 1 S 21 08 54 c 2 S 14 45 00 c 3 S 77 06 06 c 4 S 57 59 00 c 5 N 22 4151 c 6 N 45 06 49 c7 N4453 11 c 8 Varies c 9 N 00 20 10 c10 N 23 23 35 cl1S575051 c12 S 35 49 51 c13 S4542Oi c14 Varies c15 S 45 01 40 c16s445820 c17 N 70 42 15 c18 S 82 23 00 c19S 1550 C.20 S 28 18 58 CURVE INFORMATION Chord Delta 149.32 016 42 12 338.47 029 30 00 282.98 025 47 48 329.24 064 01 59 229.04 045 34 57 28.29 090 02 22 28.27 '; 089 57 38 ' 28.28 090 00 00 24.84 076 46 42 28.14 089 25 51 21.25 064 11 38 32.45 108 26 58 27.91 088 29 18 18.42 054 50 50 28.3 090 03 20 28.27 089 56 40 26.58 083 18 23 28.66 091 31 51 17.48 003 28.21 20.33 002 22 03 1 N 64 01 59 2 N 45 29 19 3 N 51 56 49 4 S 51 16 29 5 S 53 22 55 6 N 38 08 56 7 N 21 5330 8 'N 22 21 27 9 N 68 40 39 10 S 60 56 56 11 S 76 09 48 12 S 66 29 58 13 N 64 12 12 14 N; 77 12 12 15 S 6414 58 16 S 71 36 22 17 S 79 56 12 18 S 88 32 37 19 S 54 47 30 20N545410 Radius Arc Tangent 514.01 149.85 75.46 664.70 342.24 175.00 633.86 285.39 145.15 310.51 347.02 194.15 295.63 235.20 124.22 20.00 31.43 20.01 20.00 31.40 19.99 20.00 31.42 20.00 20.00 26.80 15.85 20.00 31.22 19.80 20.00 22.41 12.54 20.00 37.86 27.76 20.00 30.89 19.48 20.00 19.15 10.38 20.00 31.44 20.02 20.00 31.40 19.98 20.00 29.08 17.79 20.00 31.95 20.54 288.51 17.49 8.75 492.01 20.33 10.17 /NL AND PACIFIC ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION EAST 12720 NORA AVENUE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON , 13/031 ' t`� � .' j / f c G ). , y v - -/ �'.. �� l i d }C:a•bJs,r Cur O 67+1 • s.. .r :. � - ..- ('sir. i �•: I re 711'2 4.r • Ems+ ,.` • r - .n.. -.ir- t '• - M` ' � v 'h:,` -- • -: • PLATE ,1,:P .Ah,.i'FOFILE 10EUFFEL' e SS.Er t l � . ;•••■." • • - • :.. :_ rat__ i;1 ` ... MNNMNINMIII IIIIINMNMIIMNINMNMIIINMMNIIMMINIIIIIIIIMIMIIINIINNMIINNNNIMIMMININMIMIINNNNMIIt IMMINIMMINIMMIIMI NIIIIIIIIIINMMIIIIIIIIIIMINNININIIIIMINIIMINIIMINIMININIMMINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIININIMINIMINIIIIININIIIII =� ��.� ®� --- MOWN >4� M ®� INIMINIM® ®IIIIIIeMIIMINmMNIIIII ®.— NM=AIIIIIIIIIIII MIIIIIIININIMMINII IMIIIIIMINIIIIMMMI MIME immwriwIlitamwom _., M NM= IIIIMMIIIIIIMINIMIIIIVMMM ,: ' C L3t rr / �, .1 a...,� r i ' ..4;;�,. 4.urr'r .t f y,, -',:. 1:: ,t \ < . . i.. r, r, t .1- -,. ''.:-,' 3, : ;: 6. , v-e �� ® ®® MIENEE WC _ >LIIIIP.i -1 MOR . MI= MO= Ell NM mina 1111111111NNININIIIMIIIIMI E N - "IIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIImmuNm ® -11®® = ® ®� ®M =® ®® ' : : .. + � ® ems® ® : IMINIMMINIMINIMININN 11111•1111111111•1111111 1111111111111M1 1___:.. loam aissomamamoinsimmumema mum 1111111111111111MINIMMONINIMINIMMINI MINN =1111111111M LINIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIII =11 INIMMINIMINIMMIIMINIMMIIINIIIIIII MINI 1111111111111111 OWN ? ):" t 7 /9 J 7' Dra.fna, _ DA T P; E i11.0 / 0;11x STREET PROFILES 3 TAI AVENUE iNNMINMIIINIININMINs IMMIX -__ ®� �" f f 1 . S MIENNIMINNNINNIMIN I= IM an INNIIINNMEMMINININIIINIMINIIINMN MOsININIMINIIIMIN- ® —IIIN®IINIINNI ® ®® ® ®NIMINmININIM®oM® a - --- NN -_ IPA ®�N�� ®- - ® _ .. 111111111:1:167.1 K 1.1.111. 011.111 .11.Mill...1. = Mal i fill i Mal lin MIn WIPMINEgellaillEEN 1 ENEEMEMEME----------- M ME...NE.1MM R EMEREMEMEME Is° ERE MEM FIRM Es• QV isfEE R.: 4 t-i 1 D . i .! To , co, S i REJcf1r' . LOT 4, BLOCK 3 1' Wide Strip cti N // OTE A Lots are Subject W ,/ t to 5 Wide Drainage Easements along each side of o// interior Lot Lines and a /ong o// Rear Lot Lines. See Dedication. T. P.O.B. • NOO °05' 38 "W 30.00 Chord Bearing Inland Pacific South 25 Altamont 509 535 -1410 C.) 0z • s 11 0 //, /08 * 'CO O \ � 2 "l o • /4,1/6 0 1= SW Corner Section ' 35-26-44 Spokane County Engineer's Corner # 3543 Fnd. 3/4" I.P. and three R.P. s of Record Tk. in T. Pole, N 50 E, . 38.77' C 1 S 35 °14'21" E 100.06 C2 S 56 °45'04" E 131.66 C3 S °. C 47 28 44 E 227.72 C 4 N 22 °41'51" E 229.04 C 5 N 44 °54'22" E 28.28 C 6 N 00° 20' 10" E 24.84 C 7 S 82° 23'00" W 28.66 C 8 S 45 °06' 49" E 28.29 C 9 N 44°53' 11" E 28.27 C10 N 45°05'38" W 28.28 Fnd: 5/8" Rebar per R.O.S., Book 18 of Surveys, page 5 LOT 4, BLOCK 4 D 1' Wide Strip -- cl 0 `i ,052 Dr ,i1 \ (? 6 ; r of \t)) 1 j /( /6,643 o . / 2 0 W 08 ;2;1: j � .9?„ ` � � R . 2 e W (::/:( 2C 0 �/ n = � //i- 138. 86 (R N 8 1 ,, A o v D 3 I . 3 a O /3, 694 b I d' Op 23.10 N WABASH N N 89° 54' 22" E N AV ENU E Tk. in P. Pole, S 50 W, 37.20' (Meas. 37.29' ) "x" on face of Standpipe, S 40 E, 46.67' 113.55 �\ N I I� N 13,0300 I co N 89 °54' 22" El O 133.55 2 IN /0,85/ 4i I O N89 °54' 22 "EI 133.55 � 1I� 3 /0,85/ 40 o I co N89°54' 22" E 133.55 Y i33_55 • 6 J /0,85/47 03 N89 °54' 22 "E 133.55 133.55 N 4 co g I� o . "I N 89 54 22 E 0 133.55 in W o < rn N z 5 c IN 8 I /0,85/0 4 o N89°54' , 89 54 22"El E 3 I N 133.55 le' I"' N N 7 8 ` /0,85/0 I"' m m N89 .54 22 ' EI 133.55 Im 8 IN m /0,85/ ¢r I OJ N 89° 54' 22" E I 9 I' /0;85/ 40 N89 °54' 22" E I 0 , (rr 10 I a: Ir 3 G /3,273 d� Ire _/ Y/ / v, .- t.i g._ 22' Z U 0 0' co r` tn 0' 0' e / ti 2 C V/ 2 o 56/ //, 74/ 4 0 2 IN89 ° 54' 22 "E " I u7 of 22' 018 ° 32'40 310.51 024 46 310.51 043 310.51 045° 34' 57" 295.63 090 °00'00" 20.00 076 20.00 091 °31'51" 20.00 090 20.00 089 20.00 090 00" 20.00 oI Oi l 0 01 r, 4 10,787 0 CO W IN89 °54' 22 "E 134.78 ° I ` 5 mI /0,777¢ IN89 °54' 22" E °I 6 m ( � /0,767 0 ` 1- I N 89 °'54' 22" E 1 sw 2 135.04 100;2'98 0 I N 89 54' 22" E 'T 134.91 134.65 134.22 9 0`I /07320 4N89°54' 22 E 133.96 0 °. I 11 m I /0,71/ 1/ IN 89° 54' 22" E 01 133.83 01 12 ° 1 ` 0 22' 22' � /o, 70/ 1N89 °54' 22 "E 133.70 Engineering Company Spokane Washington 99202 UNP L A T T E ° (R) O 0 m 10 /0,722 tk m IN 89° 54 2 2 E O 0 co 0 0 m -) o 0 1 13 0 �) //,9460 �8 113.53 Lr S 89° 5�' 00' W ' 311. 10 O Frid. 5/8" Rebor per R.O.S., Book 18 of Surveys, page 5, 0 at NW Corner of Trentwood co Elementary School Site 0 co 0 0 co 134.51 le U o 0 13 7 O 0 i° 14428 tp it) J. m � 1'34.38 rm N 89 54 ' 22" E 1o.00 N 89° 54' 22" E 134. 36 0 0 0'1 0 8 co //,4/5 CO 'IN89 °54' 22"E 1983.19 !.. 155.55 -_. �--- 155.50 --, BASIS OF BEARINGS WELLESLEY 2644.24 N B9° 52' 00"E 100.50 50.69 132.66 67.36 233.16 122.39 235.20 124.22 31.42 20.00 26.80 15.85 31.95 20.54 31. 20.01 31.40 19.99 31.42 20.00 CURVE INFORMATION Chord Delta Radius Arc Tangent . , s_^ soF+ ..-- LOT 3, BLOCK 4 0 o I' Wide Strip O rn to ti n: I SO U T H w 6.10 s H O 34.09 in h 16' Wide Drainage 6 r 1 Wilily Easement LOT 14, BLOCK 10' Wide Walkway /344 rh 2 A PL UN TTE° Scale I" =1 LEGEND • Fnd. Monuments (5/8" rebar per R.O.S., Book 18 of Surveys, page 5; unless otherwise noted) 0 Set 1 n ` 2 rebar e1 / low plastic c ca P p n 00 R E 18091" at angle a oi nts i n bdr 9 points J OD $ " Set 'l 2 rebar ebar w e11 / w/ yellow lastic Y p cap "MOORE 18091 " as centerline monuments after .p ter installation of improvements Set 1/2" rebar w /yellow plastic cap MOORE 18091 at all lot corners NOTE: The Basis of Bearings for this map p is the bearing of S.89 °52'00 "W. on the South line of the`SW1 /4 of Section 35, as shown on the final plat of SWAN ACRES REPLAT NO. 1 S I/4 Corner Section 35 Spokane County Engineer's Corner # 3544 Fnd. 2" Pip e w / Wire in Mon. Case Fits three R.P.s of Record Tk. in T. Pole, S 40 E, 41.98'(Mess. 42,08') "x" on Curb, N 45 E, 55.6b'. "x " °on Curb, N 40 W, 60.32' 350.00 AVENUE. RADIAL BEARIN•IGS 1 N 64°01'59" E 2 N 45°29'19" E 3 N 21°00'33" E 4 S 44 °30'41" E 5 N 38 ° 08'56" E 6 S 53 °22'55" E 7 N 51 ° 56'49 E 3 S 51 E SUMMERFIELD EAST BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 35, T.26 N., R. 44 E. 1\4/iP SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON JANUARY 1984 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that TUPPER, INC., a Washington corporation; and BRUCE B. BUTLER and JUDITH A. BUTLER, husband and wife; and MERCEDES JESKE, a married woman dealing in her separate property; and OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, a national banking association, as Trustee for Faye S. Elliott, have caused to be platted into Lots, Blocks, and Streets the land shown hereon to be known as SUMMERFIELD EAST, said land being part of the SW1 /4 of Section 35, T.26 N., R.44 E.W.M., County of Spokane, State of Washington, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the S1 /4 Corner of Section 35; thence S.89 ° 52'00 "W. along the South line of the SW1 /4 of said Section and centerline of Wellesley Avenue as it now exists 60.00 feet in width, a distance of 661.05 feet; thence N.00 °05'38 "W., a distance of 30.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue and True Point of Beginning of this description; thence N.O0 °05'38 "W. along the East boundary of Plat No. 4 of West Farms Irrigated Tracts, as per plat thereof recorded in Book "0" of Plats, page 51, in the Spokane County Auditor's Office, a distance of 1121.63 feet; thence N.62 °23'41 "E., a distance of 192.97 feet; thence N.40 °31'59 "E., a distance of 48.01 feet; thence N.65 °56'49 "E., a distance of 128.00 feet; thence S.46 °13'24 "E,, a distance of 114.31 feet; thence S.23 °53'53 "W., a distance of 130.45 feet; thence S.12 °01'08 "E., a distance of 52.56 feet; thence S.18 °34' 40 "W. , a distance of 146.87 feet; thence South a distance of 910.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue, as it now exists 60.00 feet in width; thence S.89 °52'00 "W. along said Northerly margin a distance of 311.10 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description Containing 9.05 Acres, more or less And they do hereby dedicate to public use forever the streets and roads shown within this plat. Lots 3 and 4, Block 4 and Lot 4, Biock 3, all one (1) foot wide strips as shown hereon, are hereby dedicated to Spokane County as general county property, to be dedicated for road purposes forever, at such time as the roads are continued as full width rights of way, or until adjacent lands are platted. All driveway approaches shall conform to the road plans on file in County Engineer's Office. Access permits are required for all approaches. Direct access from individual lots to Wellesley Avenue is hereby prohibited. A public water system, acceptable to County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, and water supplier (purveyor) will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. Water service for this plat shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System plan for Spokane County. No more than one dwelling structure shall be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. Lot 14, Biock 2 is not a building site. Easements for drainage reserved ag are reserve over .a five (5) foot wide n strip along each side of interior lot lines five (5) feet of each lot. • 9 Ines and over the rear fi - Within these easements, no structure, planting or m P 9 material shall be placed or permitted P p itted to remain which ma y change the direction of flow of drainage a channels 1 n the easements, is or which ich'ma obstruct or retard h Y the flow of water thr. i - i through drainage e charm 1 e s in the easements. ements. 9 The easement of each lot tandal ; 11mr" improvements in It shall b' p be main a t l ned `b the owner f° o the lot, except t for , p those improvements for which a public authority or utility company is responsible. es ons� p A sixteen i6 foot wide e unlit and drainage a aeeas � ) easement lying Y n adjacent 9 ent total Y all front 9 � ant :an d flanking street Bet 1 of , 1 n ur i es for the purpose of o installing, l i n operating and ma n p p g! taimn utilities; for drainage 9 , Shales and. drainage .facilties� to dispose w..4 ...... runoff is hereby granted. pose of. The Co unt of S okane is herb ' granted . drainage Y p e y_g anted the right of ingress and egress to all sixteen (16) foot wide utility and Y easements adjacent to the public rights of way. The r r maintain the • o e t owner shall p p Y _k, sixteen . (16) foot wide u ( ) i utility a nd drainage easement with a l Y 9 e live cover of 1w • lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and/or trees which d Y / do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage p water in the drainage Swale as indicated by the grade of adjacent t Y d 9 �acent streets.- Sidewalks constructed within the sixteen' (16) foot wide utility and drainage easement shall be maintained by the property owner and left unobstructed and open for p ublic use. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the - Y e use of individual on site sewage systems may be authorized. Dry sewerage lines as approved and required by the governing municipality shall be installed in the platted property. The Owners or Successors in interest agree to authorize the County to place their names on a petition for the formation of 'a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owners' property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owners' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owners or Successors from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area -wide collection systems. Subject to special fees defined ;in TITLE NOTICE ICE recorded under Spokane County Auditor's Document No. 8`f , IN t J WITNESS WHEREOF, , TUPPER, INC. President the said d ner q► shave hereunto set their hands and affixed their , 19 ao seals ( if any) this `'� day of FINAL PLAT OF Bruce . Butle DEDICATION 14Q5td • e7en r); _I Mercedes Jeske ke 1� r ,. '1 ? Juopth A. Butler IN WITNESS r 1 F I,J . , T JESS WHEREOF,. ERE'F 0 OLD NATIONAL 0 JAL `.BANK 'OF . WASHINGTON, as Trustee for Faye S. Elliott, as her • Y , hereunto set its hand and affixed its seal (if any) this day of 19 OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON By By Vice 'President Trust Real Estate Officer This map formance correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in con - with the requirements of the Spokane County Platting Ordinance. aeeZ4,6 5Z 7 Patrick J. !!dare, RLS Certificate Number 18091 Examined and approved this 36 `day of Examined and COUNTY ENGI approved this ' pP � day of Examined and approved this 2. ��'I day of This plat was Washington on WITNESS my hand and official SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT , Director, Spokane Count. Utilities � v Spokane Coun Engineer COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT / Spokane County Asses COUNTY COMMISSIONERS approved and accepted by the Co ty Commissioners this day of ( 19 , 19 ; Director, Spokane County Planning Dept. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Examined and approved this: .day of �- ; r .. Co.finty Heal th''. Officer COUNTY ASSESSOR Examined and approved this c day of , 19:4?. 19 Chairran, Spokane County Commissioners COUNTY TREASURER I'd o he r e eb' certify f ti that Y all taxes Y es which have ' been levied and become chargeable ainst t e land shown within this ma have been fully map paid thin.. "W day of r , 1 Y p L karLAr Sok.n e aunt Treasurer P Y surer ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A ♦t d or of Sp " kane County, 19 ,, STATE OF WASHINGTON �° y.• On this day f 0 Y ! before , the and a ) ss me , ers� ned, 'a- ,Jotar Public in the Y and for t h.. Count of Spokane S tate of Washington, dui 9 ! y commissioned and sworn, per- tonally appeared Kenneth J. Tupper to me known to be the President of Tupper, Inc. th pp ! the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to b - be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, - for the uses and ur oses there! p p therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year last above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane STATE OF WASHINGTON I, the undersigned, a Notary ataxy Public in and for the State ) ss of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn do hereby County of Spokane ) certify that on this .D.e% day of 01/1 e4 19, personally appeared before me, Mercedes Jeske, a married woman dealing in her separate property, to me known to be the - individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary .act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. Notar. . Public - in and f or Washington, residing at he tate o STATE OF WASHINGTON ) I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State ) ss of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, do hereby County of Spokane ) certify that on this 2.•3 'day of 19( : personally appeared before me, Bruce B. Butler and Judith A. Butler, husband and wife, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEf J under my . hand and Y official seal the day and year last above written. AltAile,L car../24,r Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane ST ATE F <. 0 WASHINGTON G I J TON r On (14, day , da f >ro 0 �� (Y Y 7��1� /z��n / , l g�Z , , before me, ) ss the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of County of Spokane ) Washington, duly commissioned and s rn,: appeared (. i:,!},(: and ,� to me k nown , to be Vice President �d n et and Trust Real Estate Offi ca personally r ,l �, , espectively, of OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, the corporation that, as 'Tr p Trustee for Faye S. Elliott, has executed the within and foregoing ore,oing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary . act and deed of said core ora i p ton, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation, seal hereto affixed the day a and /J year last above written N.Qtary'Public in ' and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane LE3+ Esdr` - -0 °001 ' 7,! ° ?5 ` , Z3o 7 G''L- 2587:1 44- +7.' Rc too P°r3 8X7 S89 2 2.41.0 93+ 95.3 P.o.c 2C8.G3' . ?O.54 +59.37 ( e - .R. P. No 3o0 ) C'RRNo300`a R.143t5 86 +22;7 pr. C.R P Wo ..3 Q0: �# Q d .43 °12'L :43,2 J .t �'. St7°Oo — 1'c3 +G6.9 PT Oo L .0 c c= 41 .544 LI1131 Li26 L +381 4 + 2't 4 9 - G. °Oo 6 °3.6' pi -r- +34. !o' 1G � i ' a 730 I_ ST- 4 5 9;8 827. ,' - o o L •• 3+ ; 2!75 d " 6° 09' S'T �'i1G 9' 2 17-5 y . Hwy s , 4 ria „ *G1 �1C. Ca CJ 6 ,c. .T.' iO r4' ,.. '45t .e is 1:.' 17:'1` C.R.P No .30 A a3 `Lt T.476:o , 8.754:0' 61 +2 +7141'• T. = 8I +53,6 F?r Rev 12 + =73+02.3 PC.. LPRevrat, : s mom A NYI t oo x21 SPOKANE - —#(2. m ._ _ 'fi r` - y � �. t r x57 • • A /,cPo/C'T 1/ %4 6E S To W'ENATG HEE 2 A / /�'FD wi O CNENE [ ; V i C /'\I / Y Y 0 /n 20 ?C n 43;0 , SCALi /t • M /[.ES .NAV &;r / , 4 9 "E 2. • 7,02 AC, 707AL Nt A 1,35 O. /00 Va0 Boo 5CA ..E IS ,=aa7" owNSII P 25 N , RANGL 4m E.W. "4 ro 41L ACZESt 707, e6 ■ B. ' C, 5,2'0 AC, N \ Pt c; : 10 ' � �\ 9 0 a - ..•-•• - 587° �1 _ A 1 G,Q/ AC., 9 \ 1 ( °, 1 \ 1 e \ - -- 1 \ 27 A :, 5. 897" %1" ' Pe PCIZ4ye 1-IN JAMES A. MCARTHUR, A I A A R C H I T E C T NORTH 120 WALL, 405.SPOKANE`,WA. (509) 838-1873 . c /AC. , 70' DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that TDC, INC., a Washington corporation; and THE W. MAIN CORPORATION, `a Washington Corporation; and Mercedes Jeske; and OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, a Washington corporation, as Trustee for Faye S. Elliott have caused to be platted into Lots, Blocks, and Streets the land shown hereon to be known as SUMMERFIELD EAST ADDITION, said land being part of the S 1/2 of Section 35, T. 26 N., R. 44 E.W.M., County of Spokane, State of Washington, and being more particu- larly described as follows: Beginning at the S 1/4 Corner of Section 35; thence S.89 °52'00 "W.'along the South line of the SW 1/4 of said Section and centerline of Wellesley Avenue as it now exists 60 feet in width, a distance of 661.05 feet; thence N.00 °05'38 "W.,< a distance of 30.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue and TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence N.00 °05'38 "W. along the East boundary of Plat No. 4 of West Farms Irrigated Tracts, as per plat thereof recorded in Book "0" of Plats, Page 51, in the Spokane County Auditor's Office, a distance of 1121.63 feet; thence N.62 °23'41 "E., a distance of 192.97 feet; thence N.40 °31'59 "E., a distance of 48.01 feet; thence N.65 °56'49 "E., a distance of 128.00 feet; thence S.46 °13'24 "E., a distance of 114.31 feet; thence EAST a distance of 469.10 feet; thence N.79 °35'56 "E., a distance of 133.39 feet; thence S.56 °39'30 "E., a distance of 63.63 feet; thence N.74 °28'06 "E., a distance of 128.00 feet; thence S.13 °55'30 "E., a distance of 75.19 feet; thence S.89 °56'40 "E., a distance of 36.43 feet; thence S.00 °03'20 "W., a distance of 123.00 feet; thence S.36 °02'26 "E., a distance of 54.45 feet; thence S.00 °03'20 "W., a distance of 123.00 feet; thence S.89 °56'40 "E., a distance of 375.09 feet; thence S.00 °25'19 "W., a distance of 560.01 feet; thence N.89 °56'40 "W., a distance of 342.67 feet; thence S.00 °03'20 "W., a distance of 133.00. feet; thence S.06 °17'44 "W., a distance of 44.26 feet; thence S.00 °03'20 "W., a distance of 143.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue, as it now exists 60 feet in width; thence N.89 °56'40 "W. along said Northerly margin a dis- tance of 274.98 feet; thence NORTH a distance of 903.42 feet; thence WEST a distance of 700.00 feet; thence SOUTH a distance of 903.90 feet to said Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue; thence S.89 °52'00 "W. along said Northerly margin a distance of 311.10 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. Containing 25.74 Acres, more or less. And they do hereby dedicate to public use forever the streets and roads shown within this plat. Blocks A, B, C, D,and E,one (1) foot wide strips as shown hereon, are hereby dedicated to Spokane County as general county property, to be dedicated for road purposes forever, at such time as the roads are continued as full width rights of way, or until adjacent lands are platted. No more than one dwelling structure shall be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. A public water system, acceptable to county and state health authorities, the local fire district, and water supplier (purveyor) will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. Easements for drainage are reserved over a five (5) foot wide strip along each side of interior lot lines and over the rear five (5) feet of each lot. Within these easements, no structure, planting or other material shall be placed or permitted to remain which may change the direction of flow of drainage channels in the easements, or which may obstruct or retard the flow of water through drainage channels in the easements. The easemen6 of each lot and all improvements in it shall be maintained by the owner of the lot, except for those improvements for which a public authority or utility company is responsible. A sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easement lying adjacent to all front lot lines for the purposes of installin operating and maintaining utilities; for drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff is hereby granted. The County of Spokane is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easements adjacent to the public rights of way. The property owner shall maintain the sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easement with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage Swale as indicated by the grade of adjacent streets. Sidewalks constructed within the sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easement shall be maintained by the property owner and left unobstructed and open for public use. All lots within this subdivision are subject to a special front yard building setback of a minimum of forty (40) feet from the platted front property line. Each lot is authorized for the temporary use of an individual on -site' sewage disposal system only until an area -wide operating sewerage system is available. Dry sewerage lines as approved and required by the governing municipality shall be installed in the platted property as same is developed. As a consideration for the acceptance of this plat by the Spokane County Board of Commissioners, the owners of all non-public property herein platted into lots, blocks or tracts agree not to protest under 36.94 or 35.43.180 RCW the construction of, or legal assessment for, any sewer ultimately serving their non- public property at such time as it is desired by the governing municipality to construct such sewers. The agreement herein expressed shall be considered a covenant to run with the land and shall be carried as a provision of each and every deed drawn to transfer ownership of any and all property delineated within this plat. Each structure from which sewage is to issue shall be plumbed and connected to collector lines intended to serve the area even though use of individual on -site sewage disposal is authorized pending availability of an operating area -wide sewerage system. The plumbing shall prevent entry of sewage into the collector lines until authorized by the operating agency controlling the collector lines. The owners, their heirs, and assigns hereby agree to participate in and/or not oppose or protest the formation of a County Road Improvement District (RID) or County Road Project on Wellesley Avenue. Direct access from individual lots to Wellesley Avenue is hereby prohibited. Additional utility easements are hereby granted to or across those lots as shown hereon. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said owners have hereunto set their hands and affixed their seals (if any) this day of , 1979. T.D.C., INC. THE W. MAIN CORPORATION President President Secretary IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, as Trustee for Faye S. Elliott, has hereunto set its hand and affixed its seal (if any) this day of , 1979. OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON By By vice President Trust Real Estate Officer Examined and approved this FINAL PLAT of SUMMERFIELD EAST ADDITION BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE SI /2 OF SEC. 35, T.26N.,R.44E.W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AUGUST 1979 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, Patrick J. Moore, a registered Professional Land Surveyor, hereby certify that the map shown hereon was prepared by me subsequent to an actual survey on the - ground in . , and that the same conforms in all respects to the provisions of the orinances oT Spokane County, now in effect, and that the lot corners and monuments have been properly set as shown hereon. COUNTY UTILITIES DIRECTOR Patrick J. Moore, Professional Land Surveyor Examined and approved this day of , 1979. Director, Spokane County Utilities COUNTY ENGINEER day of .. , 1979. Spokane County Engineer COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR Examined and approved this day of 1979. Director, Spokane County Planning Department COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Examined and approved this day of , 1979. COUNTY ASSESSOR Spokane County Health Officer Examined and approved this day of , 1979. COUNTY This plat was approved and accepted by the County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington on this day!of , 1979. I do hereby certify that all taxes against the land shown within this , 1979. COUNTY TREASURER Spokane County Assessor Chairman, Spokane County Commissioners which have been levied and become chargeable map have been fully paid this day of Spokane County Treasurer ACKNOWLEDGMENTS SHEET 1 OF 2 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) On this day of , 1979, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public ) ss. in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) Kenneth J. Tupper to me known to be the President of TDC, INC., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year last above written. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in .and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned ) ss. and sworn, do hereby certify that on this day of , 1979, COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) personally appeared before me, Mercedes Jeske, dealing in her separate property, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instru- ment and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) On this day of , 1979, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public ) ss. in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) William W. Main and Katherine Lee Main, to me known to be the President and Secretary, respectively, of THE W. MAIN CORPORATION, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year last above written. WITNESS my hand and official sea l;hereto affixed the day and year last above written. jut 3 (079 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane. Notary Public in and for the State of. Washington, residing at Spokane. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) On this day of , 1979, before me, -the undersigned, a Notary ) ss. Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) appeared E. L. Rehn and E. Roger Moore, to me known to be Vice President and Trust Real Estate Officer, respectively, of OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, the corporation that, as Trustee for Faye S. Elliott, has executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notaty Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane. INLAND PACIFIC ENG /NEER /NG AND CONSTRUCT /ON CORPORATION EAST /2720 NORA AVENUE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON i� No more than one dwelling structure shall be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. A sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easement lying adjacent to all front lot lines for the purposes of installing, operating and maintaining utilities; for drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff is hereby granted. The County of Spokane is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easements adjacent to the public rights of way. The property owner shall maintain the sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easement with a permanent live cover of t lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in 0\\\\Ijs the drainage swale as indicated by the grade of adjacent streets. Sidewalks constructed within the sixteen (16) foot wide utility and drainage easement shall be maintained by the property owner and left unobstructed and open for public use All lots within this subdivision are subject to a special front yard building setback of a minimum of forty (40) feet from the platted front property line. . Each lot is authorized for the temporary use of an individual on -site sewage disposal system only until an area -wide operating sewerage system is available. Dry sewerage lines as approved and required by the governing municipality shall be installed in the platted property as same is developed. As a consideration for the acceptance of this plat by the Spokane County Board of Commissioners, the owners of all non- public property herein platted into lots, blocks iv or tracts agree not to protest under 36.94 or 35.43.180 RCW the construction of, or legal assessment for, any sewer C ultimately serving their non - public property at such time as it is desired by the governing municipality to construct such sewers. The agreement herein expressed shall be considered a covenant to run with the land and shall be carried as a provision of each and every deed drawn to transfer ownership of any and all property delineated within this plat. Each structure from which sewage is to issue shall be plumbed and connected to collector lines intended to serve the area even though use of individual on -site sewage disposal is authorized pending availability of an operating area -wide sewerage system. The plumbing shall prevent entry of sewage into the collector lines until authorized by the operating agency controlling the collector lines. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that TDC' TNC., a Washington corporation; and E W MAIN C�'��ION, a Washington Corporation; and Mer edes Jeske; and OLD NATION. BANK OF WASHINGTO , a as ington corporation, as Trustee for F S Elliot have cause • " "^o»'•e p aT " °µ ✓e. into ots, Blocks, and Streets the land shown hereon to be Pawn as IELD EAST ADDITION, said land being part of the S 1/2 of Section 35, T. 26 N., R: 44 E.W.M., County of Spokane, State of Washington, and being more particu- larly described as follows: T.D.C., INC. President Beginning at the S 1/4 Corner of Section 35; thence S.89 °52'00 "W. along the South line of the SW 1/4 of said Section and centerline of Wellesley Avenue as it now exists 60 feet in width, a distance of 661.05 feet; thence N.00 °05'38 "W., a distance of 30.00 feet to the. Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue and TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence N.00 °05'38 "W. along the East boundary of Plat No. 4 of West Farms Irrigated Tracts, as per plat thereof recorded in Book "0" of Plats, Page 51, in the Spokane County Auditor's Office, a distance of 1121.63 feet; thence N.62 °23'41 "E., a distance of 192.97 feet; thence N.40 °31'59 "E., a distance of 48.01 feet; thence N.65 °56'49 "E., a distance of 128.00 feet; thence S.46 °13'24 "E., a distance of 114.31 feet; thence EAST a distance of 469.10 feet; thence N.79 °35'56 "E., a distance of 133.39 feet; thence S.56 °39'30 "E., a distance of 63.63 feet; thence N.74 °28'06 "E., a distance of 128.00 feet; thence S.13 °55'30 "E., a distance of 75.19 feet; thence S.89 °56'40 "E., a distance of 36.43 feet; thence S.00 °03'20 "W., a distance of 123.00 feet; thence S.36 °02'26 "E., a distance of 54.45 feet; thence S.00 °03'20 "W., a distance of 123.00 feet; thence S.89 °56'40 "E., a distance of 375.09 feet; thence S.00 °25'19 "W., a distance of 560.01 feet; thence N.89 °56'40 "W., a distance of 342.67 feet; thence S.00 °03'20 "W., a distance of 133.00 feet; thence S.06 °17'44 "W., a distance of 44.26 feet; thence S.00 °03'20 "W., a distance of 143.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue, as it now exists 60 feet in width; thence N.89 °56'40 "W. along said Northerly margin a dis- tance of 274.98 feet; thence NORTH a dista • of 903.42 feet; thence WEST a distance of 700.00 feet; thence SOUTH a distance of 03,90„ feet to said Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue; thence S.89 °52'00 "W. along said therly margin a distance of 311.10 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. Containing 25.74 Acres, more or less. And they do hereby dedicate to public use forever the streets and roads shown within this plat. Blocks A, B, C, D,and E,one (1) foot wide strips as shown hereon, are hereby dedicated to Spokane County as general county property, to be dedicated for road purposes forever, at such time as the roads are continued as full width rights of way, or until adjacent lands are platted. A public water system, acceptable to county and state health authorities, the local fire district, and water supplier (purveyor) will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. Easements for drainage are reserved over a five (5) foot wide strip along each side of interior lot lines and over the rear five (5) feet of each lot. Within these easements, no structure, planting or other material shall be placed or permitted to remain which may change the direction of flow of drainage channels in the easements, or which may obstructor retard the flow of water through drainage channels in the easements. The easement of each lot and all improvements in it shall be maintained by the owner of the lot, except for those improvements for which a public authority or utility company is responsible. The owners, their heirs, and assigns hereby agree to participate in and /or not oppose or protest the formation of a County Road Improvement District (RID) or County Road Project on Wellesley Avenue. Direct access from individual lots to Wellesley Avenue is hereby prohibited. Additional utility easeme n sare hereby granted to or across those lots as shown hereon. THE W. MAIN' CORPORATION IN 64ITNESS WHEREOF, the said owners have hereunto set their hands and affixed their seals (if any) this day of , 1979. President Secretary DEDICATION IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, as Trustee for Fa S. 'ott has hereunto set its hand and affixed its seal (if any) this day of , 1979. OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON By By Vice President Trust Real Estate Officer FINAL PLAT of SUMMERFIELD EAST ADDITION BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE SI /2 OF SEC. 35, T.26N.,R.44E.W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AUGUST 1979 SURVEYOR S CERTIFICATE' I, Patrick J. Moore, a registered Professional Land Surveyor, hereby certify that the map shown hereon was prepared by me subsequent to an actual survey on the ground in , 19 , and that the same conforms in all respects to the provisions of the ordinances of Spokane County, now in effect, and that the lot corners and monuments have been properly set as shown hereon. COUNTY UTILITIES DIRECTOR Patrick J. Moore, Professional Land Surveyor Examined and approved this day of , 1979. Director, Spokane County Utilities COUNTY ENGINEER. Examined and approved this day of .. , 1979. Spokane County Engineer COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR Examined and approved this day of , 1979. Director, Spokane County Planning Department COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Examined and approved this day of. , 1979. I do hereby certify that all taxes against the land shown within this , 1979. COUNTY TREASURER Spokane County Health Officer COUNTY ASSESSOR Examined and approved this day of , 1979. Spokane County Assessor COUNTY This plat was approved and accepted by the County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington on this day of , 1979. Chairman, Spokane County Commissioners which have been levied and become chargeable map have been fully paid this day of Spokane County Treasurer STATE OF WASHINGTON LI COUNTY OF SPOKANE and is ) ss. voluntary act and deed of authorized to execute the On this day of SHEET / OF 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year last above written. GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year last above written. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year last above written. * E{ . ,�. ..s a cowl tfib jUL3 01979 , 1979, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Kenneth J. Tupper to me known to be the President of TDC, INC., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) I,` the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned ) ss. and sworn, do hereby certify that on this day of , 1979, COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) personally appeared before me, Mercedes Jeske, dealing in her separate property, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instru ment and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) On this day of , 1979, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public ss. in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) William W. Main w and Katherine Lee Main, to me known to be the President and Secretary, respectively, of THE W. MAIN CORPORATION, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) On this day of , 1979, before me, -the undersigned, a Notary ) ss. Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) appeared E. L. Rehn and E. Roger Moore, to me known to be Vice President and Trust Real Estate Officer, respectively, of LLD N_,,... OF orporation that, as Trustee for Faye S. Elliott, has executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notaty Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane. INLAND PACIF /C ENG /NEER /NG AND CONSTRUCT /ON CORPORATION EAST /2720 NORA AVENUE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON -j flF g -TAIP- tS i -S- OF- SUMMERtF I -D- EArS-T -AD0 E 12720 NORA AVE SPOKANE WASH 99216 922 1300 CHECKED BY: JWS DATE: 08/07/79 F - 1206 -'1Y BLCK LOT BEARING DISTANCE N 0 R T H S 0 U T H E A S T W E S T PLAT BORY N 0 5 38W 1121.630 1121.628 PLAT DORY N 62 23 41E 192.970 89.418 PLAT BDRY N 40 31 59E 48.010 36.489 PLAT BDRY N 65 56 49E 128.000 52.171 PLAT BDRY' S 46 13 24E 114.310 PLAT GORY S 90 0 OE 469.100 PLAT °DRY N 79 35 56E 133.390 24.082 PLAT BDRY S 56 39 30E 63.630 PLAT BORY N 74 28 6E 128.000 34.275 PLAT BDRY S 13 55 30E 75.190 PLAT BDRY S 89 56 40E 36.430 PLAT ()DRY S 0 3 20W 123.000 PLAT BDRY S 36 2 26E 54.450 PLAT BCRY S 0 3 20W 123.000 PLAT BCRY S 89 56 40E 375.090 PLAT BDRY S 0 25 19W 560.010 PLAT BURY N 89 56 40W 342.670 0.332 PLAT BDRY S 0 3 20W 133.000 PLAT BORY S 6 17 44W 44.260 PLAT BORY S 0 3 20W 143.000 PLAT BDRY N 89 56 40W 274.980 0.267 PLAT BDRY N 0 0 OE 903.420 903.420 PLAT BDRY N 90 0 OW 700.000 0.000 PLAT BDRY S 0 0 OW 903.89t1.5 PLAT ()DRY S 89 52 OW 311.100 I - --- LATITUDES - - - -1 I - -- DEPARTURES. - - - -I 79.085 0.000 34.973 72.980 0.035 123.000 44.028 123.000 0.364 559.995 133.000 43.993 143.000 903 r9`30 0.724 171.002 31.201 116.886 82.537 469.100 131.198 53.157 123.326 18.095 36.430 32.036 375.090 0.0 1 CL N 0 0 OE 195.000 195.000 0.0 1 CL S 89 56 40E 122.550 0.119 122.550 1 CL S 6 17 44W 22.130 21.997 1 CL S 0 3 20W 173.000 173.000 1 CL N 89 56 40W 119.950 0.116 1.838 0.119 0.119 4.124 342.670 0.129 4.853 0.139 274.980 700.000 0.0 311.099 dfl 2262.082 2262.068 1640.057 1640.070 AREA = 1121113. SQ FT ( 25.74 ACRES) 2.427 0.168 119.950 195.116 195.115 122.550 122.544 AREA = 23436. SQ FT ( 0.54 ACRES) 1 SL N 89 56 40W 78.000 0.076 78.000 1 SL N 0 3 20E 20.000 20.000 0.019 1 SL N 90 0 ON 20.000 0.000 20.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 89 56 40 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 31.397 TANGENT = 19.981 1 SL N 0 0 OW 103.000 103.000 0.0 1 SL S 90 0 OE 20.000 0.000 1 SL N 0 3 20E 20.000 20.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 90 3 20 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 31.435 1 SL S 89 56 40E 78.100 0.076 1 SL S 0 3 20W 143.000 143.000 2 CL N 0 0 OE 595.000 2 CL S 89 56 40E 2 CL 5 36 2 26E 2 CL S 0 3 20W 2 CL S 89 56 40E 2 CL S 0 25 19W 2 CL N 89 56 40W 2 CL S 0 3 20W 2 CL S 6 17 44W 2 CL N 89 56 40W 136.040 27.225 123.000 375.090 560.010 342.670 133.000 22.130 122.550 143.076 143.076 98.139 98.139 AREA = 13849. SQ FT ( 0,.32 ACRES) 595.000 0.0 2 CL S 89 59 60W 664.700 0.000 2 CL N 66 29 58E 664.700 265.054 609.567 - CURVE: DELTA = 23 30 2 RADIUS = 664.700 LENGTH = 272.635 TANGENT .= 138.261 0.332 0.119 20.000 0.019 TANGENT Jr- 78.100 0.132 136.040 22.014 16.018 123.000 0.364 375.090 559.995 133.000 21.997 2 SL N 89 56 40W 82.990 0.080 2 SL N 0 3 20E 20.000 20.000 2 SL N 90 0 OW 20.000 0.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 89 56 40 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 31.397 2 SL N 0 0 OW 215.000 215.000 2 SL S 90 0 OE 20.000 0.000 2 SL N 0 3 20E 20.000 20.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 90 3 20 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 31.435 2 SL S 89 56 40E 239.000 0.232 2 SL S 0 3 20W 20.000 20.000 2 SL N 54 54 10E 20.000 11.499 +CURVE: DELTA = 54 50 50 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 19.145 2 SL N 54 54 10E 46.000 26.448 2 SL N 54 47 30W 46.000 26.521 - CURVE: DELTA = 289 41 40 RADIUS = 46.000 LENGTH = 232.582 2 SL N 54 47 30W 20.000 11.531 2 SL S 0 3 20W 20.000 20.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 54 50 50 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 19.145 2 SL N 89 56 40W 239.070 0.232 2 SL N 0 3 20E 20.000 20.000 2 SL N 90 0 OW 20.000 0.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 89 56 40 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 31.397 2 SL N 0 0 OW 204.000 204.000. 2 SL S 90 0 OE 20.000 2 51 N 0 3 20E 20.000 20.000 2 SL N 54 54 10E 20.000 11.499 +CURVE: DELTA = 54 50 50 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 19.145 2 SL N 54 54 10E 46.000 26.448 2 SL N 54 47 30W 46.000 26.521 - CURVE: DELTA = 289 41 40 RADIUS = 46.000 LENGTH = 232.582 2 SL N 54 47 30W 20.000 11.531 0.019 TANGENT 20.000 0.019 TANGENT = 239.000 16.364 TANGENT = 37.636 0.019 TANGENT = 0.000 20.000 0.019 20.019 0.139 - 664.700 0.119 4.124 342.670 0.129 2.427 122.550 860.506 860.501 1136.715 1136.719 AREA = 301115. SQ FT t 6.91 ACRES) 82.990 20.000 19.981 0.0 20.019 0.019 10.377 37.585 TANGENT = - 32.393 16.341 • 0.019 TANGENT = 10.377 239.070 20.000 19.981 0.0 +CURVE: DELTA = 90 3 20 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 31.435 TANGENT = 20.019 2 SL S 89 56 40E 239.000 0.232 239.000 2 SL S 0 3 20W 20.000 20.000 0.019 16.364 TANGENT.= 10.377 37.636 _. . 37.585 TANGENT = - 32.393 16.341 2 SL S 0 3 20W 20.000 20.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 54 50 50 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 19.145 2 SL N 89 56 40W 239.300 0.232 2 SL N 0 3 20E 20.000 20.000 2 SL S 88 32 37W 20.000 0.508 +CURVE: DELTA = 88 29 17 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 30.888 2 SL S 88 32 37W 686.700 17.453 2 SL N 71 36 22E 686.700 216.687 - CURVE: DELTA = 16 56 15 RADIUS = 686.700 LENGTH = 202.999 2 SL N 71 36 22E 20.000 6.311 2 SL N 0 3 20E 20.000 20.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 108 26 58 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 37.856 2 SL S 89 56 40E 91.010 0.088 2 SL S 0 3 20W 123.000 123.000 2 SL S 89 56 40E 375.090 0.364 2 SL S 0 25 19W 560.010 559.995 2 SL N 89 56 40W 342.670 2 SL S 0 3 20W 133.000 0.332 133.000 3 CL N 0 5 38W 965.780 965.779 3 CL N 89 54 22E 295.630 0.484 3 CL N 44 30 41W 295.630 210.817 +CURVE: DELTA = 45 34 57 RADIUS = 295.630 LENGTH = 235.193 3 CL N 45 29 19E 310.510 217.683 3 CL S 0 0 OE 310.510 310.510 - CURVE: DELTA = 45 29 19 RADIUS = 310.510 LENGTH = 246.522 3 CL S 90 0 OE 324.850 0.000 3 CL N 0 0 OE 633.860 633.860 3 CL S 25 47 48E 633.860 570.692 - CURVE: DELTA = 25 47 48 RADIUS = 633.860 LENGTH = 285.387 3 CL N 64 12 12E 514.010 223.686 3 CL S 60 30 OW 514.010 253.111 - CURVE: DELTA = 3 42 12 RADIUS = 514.010 LENGTH = 33.223 3 CL S 60 30 OW 664.700 327.314 3 CL N 90 0 OE 664.700 0.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 29 30 0 RADIUS = 664.700 LENGTH = 342.235 3 CL S 0 0 OE 790.000 790.000 3 CL N 89 56 40W 155.000 0.150 3 CL N 0 0 OE 933.420 933.420 3 CL N 90 0 OW 700.000 0.000 3 CL S 0 0 OE 933.890 933.890 3 CL S 89 52 OW 155.500 0.362 3 SL S 89 52 OW 113.530 0.264 3 SL N 0 7 60W 20.000 20.000 3 SL S 89 54 22W 20.000 0.033 +CURVE: DELTA = 90 2 22 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 31.430 3 SL N 0 5 38W 915.750 915.749 3 SL N 89 54 22E 273.630 0.448 3 SL N 53 22 55W 273.630 163.214 +CURVE: DELTA = 36 42 43 RADIUS = 273.630 LENGTH = 175.327 3 SL S 53 22 55E 20.000 11.930 3 SL N 38 8 56E 20.000 15.728 +CURVE: DELTA = 91 31 51 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 31.950 • 0.019 TANGENT 10.377 239.300 0.019 19.994 TANGENT = .. 19.479 686.478 651.616 TANGENT = 102.245 18.978 0.019 TANGENT = 27.756 91.010 375.090 0.0 0.0 TANGENT = 0.119 4.124 342.670 0.129 914.875 914.872 1762.810. 1762.803 AREA = 243959. SQ FT I 5.60 ACRES) 1.583 295.630 207.252 TANGENT = 124.218 221.428 0.0 TANGENT = 130.171 324.850 0.0 275.842 TANGENT = 145.154 462.786 447.372 TANGENT = 16.617 578.525 664.700 TANGENT = 175.001 0.0 155.000 700.000 155.500 3185.880 3185.879 2245.236 2245.231 AREA = 451465. SQ FT 1 10.36 ACRES) 113.530 0.047 20.000 20.014 1.501 273.630 219.624 TANGENT = 90.791 16.053 12.354 TANGENT = 20.542 3 SL N 38 8 56E 332.510 261.489 3 SL S 0 0 OE 332.510 332.510 - CURVE: DELTA = 38 8 56 RADIUS = 332.510 LENGTH = 221.393 3 SL N 90 0 OE 324.850 0.000 3 SL N 0 0 OE 655.860 655.860 3 SL S 22 21 27E 655.860 606.558 - CURVE: DELTA = 22 21 27 RADIUS = 655.860 LENGTH = 255.924 3 SL S 22 21 27E 20.000 18.497 3 SL N 60 56 56E 20.000 9.712 +CURVE: DELTA = 83 18 23 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 29.079 3 SL S 60 56 56W 642.700 312.089 3 SL N 90 0 OE 642.700 0.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 29 3 4 RADIUS = 642.700 LENGTH = 325.873 3 SL S 0 0 OE 739.960 739.960 3 SL N 89 59 60W 20.000 0.000 3 SL S 0 3 20W 20.000 20.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 90 3 20 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 31.435 3 SL N 89 56 40W 112.980 0.110 3 SL N 0 0 OE 903.420 903.420 3 SL S 89 59 60W 700.000 0.000 3 SL S 0 0 OE 903.890 903.890 4 4 4 4 CL CL CL CL N 0 5 38W N 89 54 22E S 0 5 38E S 89 52 OW 900.280 155.550 900.180 155.550 4 SL S 89 54 22W 20.000 4 SL S 0 8 OE 20.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 89 57 38 RADIUS = 20.000 4 SL S 89 52 OW 113.560 5 CL N 0 5 38W 251.350 • 251.350 5 CL N 62 23 41E 192.970 89.418 5 CL N 40 31 59E 23.840 18.119 5 CL N 64 1 59E 310.510 135.958 5 CL S 45 29 19W 310.510 - CURVE: DELTA = 18 32 40 RADIUS = 310.510 5 CL S 44 30 41E 295.630 5 CL S 89 54 22W 295.630 - CURVE: DELTA = 45 34 57 RADIUS = 295.630 5 CL S 0 5 38E 65.600 2945.730 2945.730 1749.550 1749.540 AREA = 373195. SQ FT ( 8.57 ACRES) 900.279 0.255 900.179 0.362 4 SL N 0 5 38W 848.280 848.279 4 SL N 89 54 22E 113.550 0.186 4 SL S 0 5 38E 20.000 20.000 4 SL N 89 54 22E 20.000 0.033 +CURVE: DELTA = 90 0 0 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 31.416 4 SL S 0 5 38E 808.200 808.199 205.394 0.0 TANGENT = 114.976 324.850 0.0 249.479 TANGENT = 129.611 7.608 17.484 TANGENT = 17.790 561.840 642.700 TANGENT = 166.519 0.0 20.000 0.019 TANGENT = 20.019 112.980 0.0 700.000 0.0 155.550 ,,, 1.475 900.534 900.541 157.025 . 157.025 AREA = 140031. SQ FT ( 3.21 ACRES) 113.550 0.033 . 20.000 TANGENT = 1.324 0.033 20.000 LENGTH = 0.264 171.002 15.493 279.163 1.475 155.550 1.390 20.000 20.000 0.047 31.402 TANGENT = 19.986 113.560 848.498 848.496 134.954 134.950 AREA = 113110. SQ FT ( 2.60 ACRES) 0.412 217.683 221.428 LENGTH = 100.500 TANGENT = 50.693 210.817 207.252 0.484 295.630 LENGTH = 235.193 TANGENT = 124.218 65.600 0.107 7 5 CL S 89 54 22W 155.550 0.255 155.550 5 SL N 0 5 38W 229.350 5 SL N 62 23 41E 192.970 5 SL N 62 23 41E 332.510 5 SL S 51 56 49W 332.510 - CURVE: DELTA = 10 26 52 RADIUS = 332.510 5 SL S 51 56 49W 20.000 5 SL S 51 16 29E 20.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 76 46 42 RADIUS = 20.000 5 SL S 51 16 29E 317.630 5 SL S 89 54 22W 317.630 - CURVE: DELTA = 38 49 9 RADIUS = 317.630 5 SL S 0 5 38E 23.600 5 51 S 89 54 22W 20.000 5 SL S 0 5 38E 20.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 90 0 0 RADIUS = 20.000 5 SL S 89 54 22W 113.550 6 CL N 40 31 59E 24.170 6 CL N 65 56 49E 128.000 6 CL S 46 13 24E 114.310 6 CL N 90 0 OE 469.100 6 CL N 79 35 56E 133.390 6 CL S 56 39 30E 31.070 6 CL N 77 12 12E 514.010 6 CL S 64 12 12W 514.010 223.686 - CURVE: DELTA = 13 0 0 RADIUS = 514.010 LENGTH = 116.625 6 CL N 25 47 48W 633.860 570.692 6 CL S 0 0 OE 633.860 633.860 +CURVE: DELTA = 25 47 48 RADIUS = 633.860 LENGTH = 285.387 6 CL N 89 59 60W 324.850 0.000 6 CL N 0 0 OE 310.510 310.510 6 CL S 64 1 59W 310.510 135.958 +CURVE: DELTA = 64 1 59 RADIUS = 310.510 LENGTH = 347.022 6 6 6 6 6 6 SL SL SL SL SL SL N 65 56 49E 128.000 S 46 13 24E 114.310 N 90 0 OE 469.100 N 79 35 56E 133.390 N 79 35 56E 536.010 S 68 40 39W 536.010 494.844 494.840 673.018 673.019 229.350 89.418 154.078 18.370 52.171 0.000 24.082 113.849 52.171 0.000 24.082 96.770 AREA = 55357. SQ FT ( 1.27 ACRES) 204.956 LENGTH = 60.633 12.328 12.512 LENGTH = 26.801 198.705 0.521 LENGTH = 215.201 23.600 0.033 20.000 LENGTH = 31.416 0.186 79.085 17.077 79.085 194.902 - CURVE: DELTA = 10 55 17 RADIUS = 536.010 LENGTH = 102.171 6 SL S 68 40 39W 20.000 7.272 6 SL 5 21 53 30E 20.000 18.558 +CURVE: DELTA = 89 25 51 RADIUS = 20.000 LENGTH = 31.217 6 SL N 21 53 30W 611.860 567.739 6 SL 5 0 0 OE 611.860 611.860 171.002 294.657 0.376 261.832 TANGENT = 30.401 15.749 15.603 TANGENT = 15.846 247.800 317.630 TANGENT = 111.915 0.039 20.000 0.033 TANGENT = 20.000 113.550 472.845 472.840 729.135 729.136 AREA = 43760. SQ FT ( 1.00 ACRES) 15.708 116.886 82.537 469.100 131.198 25.956 501.243 462.786 TANGENT = 58.564 275.842 0.0 TANGENT = 145.154 324.850 0.0 279.163 TANGENT = 194.153 1089.674 1089.666 1342.627 1342.641 AREA = 136161. SQ FT ( 3.13 ACRES) 116.886 82.537 469.100 131.198 527.202 499.319 TANGENT = 51.241 18.631 7.457 TANGENT = 19.802 228.134 0.0 +CURVE: DELTA = 21 53 30 RADIUS = 611.860 LENGTH = 233.780 6 SL N 89 59 60W 324.850 0.000 6 SL N 0 0 OE 288.510 288.510 6 SL S 65 56 49W 288.510 117.592 +CURVE: DELTA = 65 56 49 RADIUS = 288.510 LENGTH = 332.072 1029.272 1029.270 1334.380 1334.392 AREA = 112907. SQ FT ( 2.59 ACRES) 7 CL N 89 56 40W 136.040 0.132 7 CL S 66 29 58W 664.700 265.054 7 CL N 60 30 OE 664.700 327.314 - CURVE: DELTA = 5 59 58 RADIUS = 664.700 LENGTH = 69.601 7 CL N 60 30 OE 514.010 253.111 7 CL S 77 12 12W 514.010 113.849 +CURVE: DELTA = 16 42 12 RADIUS = 514.010 LENGTH = 149.848 7 CL S 56 39 30E 32.560 17.896 7 CL N 74 28 6E 128.000 7 CL S 13 55 30E 75.190 7 CL S 89 56 40E 36.430 7 CL S 0 3 20W 123.000 7 CL S 36 2 26E 27.225 7 SL N 89 56 40W 93.090 0.090 7 SL N 0 3 20E 20.000 20.000 7 SL S 64 14 58W 20.000 +CURVE: DELTA = 64 11 38 RADIUS = 20.000 7 SL S 64 14 58W 686.700 7 SL S 0 3 20W 123.000 34.275 614.831 AREA = 72.980 0.035 123.000 22.014 8.689 LENGTH = 22.408 298.340 7 SL N 60 30 OE 686.700 338.147 - CURVE: DELTA = 3 44 58 RADIUS = 686.700 LENGTH = 44.938 7 SL N 60 30 OE 492.010 242.277 7 SL S 74 28 6W 492.010 131.746 +CURVE: DELTA = 13 58 6 RADIUS = 492.010 LENGTH = 119.949 7 SL N 74 28 6E 128.000 34.275 7 SL S 13 55 30E 75.190 72.980 7 SL S 89 56 40E 36.430 0.035 123.000 634.790 634.790 AREA = 24107. TANGENT = 118.333 324.850 0.0 263.458 TANGENT = 187.171 578.525 TANGENT. = 447.372 501.243 TANGENT = 75.459 27.201 123.326 _ 18.095 36.430 16.018 ., 0.019 136.040 609.567 34. 832 0.119 614.829 1246.966 . 1246.970 31161. SQ FT ( 0.72 ACRES) 93.090 18.014 TANGENT = 12.544 618.507 597.673 TANGENT = 22.477 428.224 474.043 TANGENT .= 60.273 123.326 18.095 36.430 0.119 1203.767 1203.773 SQ FT ( 0.55 ACRES) L i LOS-AREA S7 AT ISLIGS- F_OR__SUNBER_FIELD -EAST ADD BLOCK 7 AREA = 24107. SQ FT ( 0.55 ACRES) ACCUM AREA = 0. SQ FT ( 0.0 ACRES) DIFFERENCE = 24107. SQ FT GROSS DENSITY: 3 LOTS /ACRE NET DENSITY: 4 LOTS /ACRE LARGEST LOT: 0. SQ FT SMALLEST LOT: 0. SQ FT AVERAGE LOT: 11418. SQ FT # OF LOTS: 81 FLLE 1206 08/07/7_9 1206- 75 - LBT- A*EA- STAT {STICS- FOR:- SUMi1ERFIELD- EAST -Afl0 BLOCK 7 AREA = 24107. SQ FT ( 0.55 ACRES) ACCUM AREA = 0. SQ FT ( 0.0 ACRES) DIFFERENCE = 24107. SQ FT GROSS DENSITY: 3 LOTS /ACRE NET DENSITY: 4 LOTS /ACRE LARGEST LOT: 0. SQrFT SMALLEST LOT: 0. SQ FT AVERAGE LOT: 11418. SQ FT OF LOTS: 81 FILE. 1206 08/07/79