The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1206C-78d All .1 Anne iC o f 2-on 3 PcA CHec.K r . g� d ✓ 'k- AI,•,e ,4 c✓ ©4_ -S E 8 K Le 4. E'JV0 0 44 44471 .itr 2ki/en.S._ ,, r--. , st r Loetfi - Ina to 0 C a 5 LS N4flACGLieo.tr SI- SLE1ro_ef_CSrl f' grins O r. in ,# o aid oriis 0 l Alan/ c erur 4' 0 - b v_ zor (la; .,l,e //we av, r (/e(J PEO/ - ton eNvff/a47KU 0 C LC f = --True o fi d a GLo e ineAr 'e'r , N / A. N /4 Tinder x Lo r , 4kc 415 or_ store "MeleAC NJ O IC N o /1ti'7/Q I I f -SCi.1 Er is ,'{ 0 Fo ur .Sr2 P 1 o /� 0 (` of - �trafir w RJn -C(P sr4rtz,.,F -0 N( A. e r e s Pen Heads-en e 0 K 0 c -e Co g re-55 • 4/ / ED /cA7 i n_ry__ f , n i11.1 n4 6_4Anler“IAAS- loo r /A O tO( • • LQflenn .floc. tt i • to leg) hD 14 4EN stla �"/ i`i. ON-i b[ et? S 0 O r :1?/ 0 1Ank(E R S t4 t P3 Reap P Ail )ec e2� .ifig 6/tp MILES (►.IEw) lU7z6J1 fi e = 1z3 V O ale 0.37 FS 7 Tr, J_ A /CEA » qo9C- o r 4c.KNo wi-ED6 emisAJT$ .S I e AI E D By FA-16 10 6U. 47--/7-87 Al A- AA E 1 .# 7 ,11 �vtR-iPC1 ..et) I) SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE Washington Mutual Savings Bank 11205 E Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 RE: Summerfield East 3rd Addition PE 1206C Dear Sir or Madam: cc: Star Brokers Tupper Att. Ken Tupper PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 May 25, 1990 Please be advised that Savings Assignment No. 012- 854353 -6 issued by your company for roadway improvements in the above mentioned subdivision, in the current amount of $2,420.00 may now be released. If you have any questions, feel free to call our office. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer rry Si s Plat Inspector Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 - BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION NO. 90 0005 IN THE MATTER OF ESTABLISHMENT OF STREETS IN SUMMERFIE EAST 3RD ADDITION NO. 1206 -C COUNTY ENGINEER'S FILE NO. 2583 ATTEST: a:!! LIAM E. DONAHUE ERK OF THE BO I1 /L Z t, A i 2004o LUCILLE ROAD - BELLEVUE COURT OLYMPIC AVENUE CROWN AVENUE - D T OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION - ESTABLISHMENT This being the day set for the hearing on Spokane County Engineer's Report on the proposed establishment of STREETS IN SUMMERFIELD EAST 3RD ADDITION NO. 1206 -C, NO. 2583, proceedings for which were initiated by PRELIMINARY RESOLUTION No. 89 -1383, and it appearing to the Board on proof duly made that Notice of Hearing was published and posted in the manner and for the time required by law, and the Board after examining the report and maps of the Spokane County Engineer and all claims and papers on file and after hearing all other evidence adduced at the hearing; and IT FURTHER APPEARING that the rights - of-way have been dedicated as public roads, 50 and 60 feet wide, and that said roads are a public necessity and the same should be opened and established as County roads. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, that the hereinafter described roads as reported by the Spokane County Engineer on the 2nd day of January, 1990, being more particularly described as follows: 50 feet wide, from the South lien of Lot 2 Block 12 Summerfield East 2nd Addition Northerly to -the centerline of Crown Avenue. - 50 feet wide, from the centerline of Olympic Avenue Northerly to end including cul-de -sac. - 50 feet wide, from the West line of Lot 3 Block 9 Summerfield East 1st Addition to the centerline of Lucille Road. 60 feet wide, from the West line of Progress Road Westerly to the Easterly line of Lot 2 Block 16 Summerfield 3rd Addition. All as shown on the Plat of Summerfield East 3rd Addition in the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 E.W.M. (P and as shown by the records and maps on file in the office of the Spokane County Engineer be and the same hereby are established as County roads and the same shall be known as LUCILLE ROAD, BELLEVUE COURT, OLYMPIC AVENUE AND CROWN AVENUE, No. 2583. The road supervisor of the road district in which the said roads are located is hereby directed to open and maintain the same for public use and travel. WHEREAS, the following one foot strips be and are hereby dedicated for road purposes and the County Engineer is directed to cause a copy of this resolution to be recorded in the Office of the County Auditor: Lot 3 Block 9, Summerfield East First Addition Lot 2 Block 7, Summerfield East First Addition Lot 2 Block 12, Summerfield East Second Addition PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, this 2nd day of January, 1990. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Steven Hasson 7.4 . Z 00 L -Q'- 1 2 Z 31 3.3' • 002.4.2 z7 '>E ROv I.PRcv ESTABLISHMENT OF STREETS IN SUMMERFIELD EAST 3RD ADDITION ROAD FILE No, 2583 AND DEDICATION OF 1' STRIPS • l.--J ao 'So So ^`1 0 1n 6 z Sta. U.L. Dens. Jffset Read- ings Avq. Corr.Ga Std. % Rice Sta. etc—. to Sta. /5/4 7 Depth orr.UL Control ACP 1— Lot No. ,3 Tons ¢ 225 /o0_09zess af7° \ /8 'te r9r Class 8/ ATB Thick , /7 1 /7 /G A Lane: Other C E,,F, G 4 /f . or. ; '�J, �t UT's � 4/7 /1'2 (5. J Leveling Std.Densit Rollers Passes Temp: Mat Remarks Wearing c� Leveling Std.Density Rollers Passes Temp: Mat Remarks Rice Densit Luc; //o .5 G R Rice 90,2 r,'; S /f! c / / Z QQ /o? .i ° — Air 4 /7 Z r Sum ^ Sum Air .. Avq. Sum t'/ Ga uge Correction actor 7, a Sta. U.L. Dens. Jffset Read - ings Avq. Corr.Ga % Std. % Rice Sta. to Sta. Depth - orr.UL Control ACP Lot No. Tons ATB Thick Class B, C, E, F, G Lane: Lt. or Rt.; EB, WB, NB, SB Other Leveling Std.Density Rollers Passes Temp: Mat Remarks Wearing Density Rice Air Sum Avg. Avg. Gauge Correction Factor Sta. U.L. Dens. Jffset Read- ings Avq. Corr.Ga % Std. % Rice Sta. to Sta. Depth Zorr.UL Control ACP Lot No. Tons ATB Thick Class B, C, E, F, G Lane: Lt. or Rt.; EB, WB, NB, SB Other Leveling Std.Density Rollers Passes Temp: Mat Remarks Wearing Density Rice Air Sum Avg. Gauge Correction Factor Z Contract No. �Q SR No. Section cfcy„f 4 nspector 04/4 Comments: 'ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMPACTION CONTROL REPORT Gauge No. /Me Project Engineer Street Inspector /0 ; 14 INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE Date c' -.2 6? 0 Contractor..a/ i jS�dhg� Sta. U.L. Dens. Jffset Read- in.s Av.. Corr.Ga % Std. % Rice Sta. ,5,24/7 to Sta. /3*go Depth "orr.UL Control ACP Class Lane: Other Lot No. / Tons '=- ' s /-9 5 j 52/ • o /42,1 /4 0 .9 / 4 n ,¢ 141 1Y7C 90= 92 - S . 9 / ' z ' ATB Thick 9 ' /43,/ C, E, F, t or Rt.; EB, WB„ SB ?e 72 MPao /3,,,9 plentrss io--oo /442,/ At f /4 ' / 92,0 Leveling Std.Density Rollers Passes Temp: Mat Remarks Wearing Density ,i( Rice /53,0 ors 1/400 J,3#-7... •Wearing Density /4/19 /4 i 1/1-0 0 9/'7 Dn✓ TS /384 Rol lersI T5, c`� y Passes P *5 (Rico /a & D , /37 -Z /.364 438.7 89' /60)? Air $p Temp: Mat /6 o' Ai r Sa /3C% / Zee rC.a:,(r 14.m..,e Sum a ., / Sum Air L im C on Factor /,p _ Avg. q 9Gaug Sta. U.L. Dens. ,Offset Read- ings Avg. Corr.Ga % Std. % Rice Sta. L to Sta. akue,!✓r/. Depth Corr.UL Contro L� of No. 2 - Tons 310 Lua,'de. / /too j 52/ • o / 90= ACP _ ATB Thick t2" ,6t/- /43,/ CI s Q C, E, F, G Lane: Lt. or Rt.; EB, WB, NB, SB Other cad%!/e. {o 0O /3,,,9 1,t� 877 / ©MPk /51-� /3 , /33 87.¢ Leveling Wearing 2C Leveling Std.Density Rollers Passes Temp: Mat Remarks J,3#-7... •Wearing Density Std.Density Rice Density/S3,o 1/1-0 0 ry/ /,37,/ �, 1,3(2.5 g9.2g9.2:- • Rol lersI T5, c`� y Passes /a & D , /,3,q,(, 438.7 9o4 Temp: Mat /6 o' Ai r Sa c. / Remarks_ , „ ., ....J!, a ., / Sum Air 40 ��snp''.f sei Gauge' Correction Factor Avg. q Sta. U.L. Dens. Jffset Read- ings Avg. Corr.Ga % Std. % Rice Sta. to Sta. Depth - orr.UL Control ACP Lot No. Tons ATB Thick Class B, C, E, F, G Lane: Lt. or Rt.; EB, WB, NB, SB Other Leveling Std.Density Rollers Passes Temp: Mat Remarks •Wearing Density Rice Air Sum Avg. Gauge Correction Factor Section nspector,Lf, Street Inspector .a,// /. Comments: ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMPACTION CONTROL REPORT Date 4 - / -g7 Contract No. 44,13 -042 SR No. Gauge No. Mt- z3 Project Engineer 770,46, , INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE Contractor ,Z„'`yy, A1p4q /I- OFF I C E c F T H E C Cl U N T Y E ri e I NEE R TO: Tom Yake FROM: Jerry Sims SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON SUBJECT: Summerfield East 3rd Addition PE 1206 C 11111S— — DATE: June 219 .1990 l Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. J We have received a request from the sponsor to reduce /release the bond for the above mentioned project. Please review this at your earliest possible convenience and notify me of the amount, if any, we need to retain in order to assure the completion of the project. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS OFFICE QUICK EXTRACTION Contract No. F4z3• 6 4"2 Sample No. / Class Asphalt Determination Date 1. —/-- &'7 1. Filter Paper + Diat. Silica After Use and Dried 3/, o 2. Filter Paper + Diat. Silica Before Use 3. Gain in Weight (200 Minus) (111 - 112) 4. Aggregate Weight After Drying 5. Total Aggregate Weight (113 + 114) 6. % Asphalt Original Sample Weight Minus Total Aggregate Weight (S5) Total Grams Asphalt Wt. Asphalt % Asphalt = Original Sample Wt X 100 a,3 /die /of& //0 3, ea /o 92, C G/. / SSY AGGREGATE GRADATION Weight Percent Retained Retained Percent Sieve (Accumulative)* (Accumulative) ** Passing Specs 1 -1/4" 1 5/8" b AZ) /o /o 0 1/2" r �S o3. Y flo 9Dym 3/8" / 92- /3, l0 8l0 7S90 1/4" - 1 0, (o 7/ Sf- 7 5 1110 6 Zo S, 5.% 31 - 4 6- 1140 /2,0 7f 7 .2/ g -Zy 1180 9J tag. 7 !2n L - /.S 11200 /O // 92S 2,0-074n Pan /OS Not used in computing grading (Checks ne 11) /of ...S Total Aggregate (Form Line 115) *Weights to nearest gram * *Compute to nearest percent except 11200 only to nearest 0.1%. D6 /f105 Bin 10 / j nspector G LASS n zn tnnid "l 8 �A6 ,o41v LAB NO. C. WGT IN WATER B. WGT SAT. SURF. DRY A. WGT OF OVEN DRY SAMPLE CALC BULK SP GR = B -C WGT /CU FT. = BULK SP GR X 62.2= 2 A. WGT OF DRY MAT B. WGT OF PYE + H 0 2 A +B= C. WGT OF PYE + H 0 + MAT 2 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CORES DETERMINATION OF % AIR VOIDS W.S.T.D. TEST METHOD NO. 706A (METHOD C) CORE NO. LAB NO. CORE NO. C. WGT IN WATER B. WGT SAT. SURF. DRY A= CALC BULK SP GR = B -C W.S.T.D. TEST METHOD 705A (68 ° ) A. WGT OF OVEN DRY SAMPLE y /1 /87 WGT /CU FT. = BULK SP GR X 62.2= A. WGT OF DRY MAT 500.9 B. WGT OF PYE + H 0 1472.0 2 A +B= 1 i12- 7 n C. WGT OF PYE + H 0 + MAT 1 2 A +B -C A +B -C 203.7 RICE SP GR = A = RICE SP GR = A � Y A +B -C A +B -C RICE SP GR X 62.2 =MAX WGT /CU FT RICH SP GR X 62.2 =MAX WGT /CU FT 153.0 AIR VOIDS =100X1 -BULK SP GR= % AIR VOIDS =100XI -BULK SP GR= RICE SP GR RICE SP GR , 241 X16 4 q. er G � 614/ O ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CORES / Q DETERMINATION OF % AIR VOIDS A= CALC BULK SP GR = B -0O /f / I WGT /CU FT. = BULK SP GR X 62.2= 1337 7 W.S.T.D. TEST METHOD NO. 706A (METHOD C) LAB NO. 3 CORE NO. .3 I LAB NO. CORE NO. C. WGT IN WATER 4,06 C. WGT IN WATER B. WGT SAT. SURF. DRY 73 / B. WGT SAT. SURF. DRY A. WGT OF OVEN DRY SAMPLE 2491 A. WGT OF OVEN DRY SAMPLE A= CALC BULK SP GR = B -C W.S.T.D. TEST METHOD 705A (68 ° ) WGT /CU FT. = BULK SP GR X 62.2= A. WGT OF DRY MAT A. WGT OF DRY MAT B. WGT OF PYE + H 0 B. WGT OF PYE + H 0 2 2 A +B= A+B= C. WGT OF PYE + H 0 + MAT C. WGT OF PYE + H 0 + MAT 2 2 A +B -C 1 A +B -C RICE SP GR = A = RICE SP GR = A = A +B -C A +B -C RICE SP GR X 62.2 =MAX WGT /CU FT 1S3• RICE SP GR X 62.2 =MAX WGT /CU FT AIR VOIDS =100X1 -BULK SP GR= % AIR VOIDS = 100X1 -BULK SP GR= RICE SP GR 0;77 RICE SP GR 3 L 5 41- / 7," ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CORES Ly' /4p 4 � DETERMINATION OF % AIR VOIDS t 3 /e W.S.T.D. TEST METHOD NO. 706A (METHOD C) W.S.T.D. TEST METHOD 705A (68 ° ) iG L o� )./M Dept �% LAB NO. / CORE NO. / LAB NO. Z CORE NO. Z C. WGT IN WATER 4 /0 /. C. WGT IN WATER _ 5/91 B. WGT SAT. SURF. DRY 7 27 B. WGT SAT. SURF. DRY $ 7$" A. WGT OF OVEN DRY SAMPLE 7Og A. WGT OF OVEN DRY SAMPLE FS A= A= CALC BULK SP GR = B-C . /9 87 I CALC BULK SP GR = B -C o'. /897 WGT /CU FT. = BULK SP GR X 62.2= 436,f3 WGT /CU FT. = BULK SP GR X 62.2= /3 rv, Z A. WGT OF DRY MAT A. WGT OF DRY MAT B. WGT OF PYE + H 0 B. WGT OF PYE + H 0 2 I 2 A +B= I A +B= C. WGT OF PYE + H 0 + MAT C. WGT OF PYE + H 0 + MAT 2 2 A +B -C I A +B -C RICE SP GR = A = RICE SP GR = A = A +B -C A +B -C RICE SP GR X 62.2 =MAX WGT /CU FT RICE SP GR X 62.2 =MAX WGT /CU FT % AIR VOIDS =100X1 -BULK SP GR= % AIR VOIDS =100X1 -BULK SP GR= RICE SP GR g,, le RICE SP GR 11.00 fl (MOMAMC COUNT? (00 0T MOUS( DATE County Engineer; Utilities; Health District; To: Building & Safety; Assessor FROM: ,Thbn Pederson. Planner -Ile SUBJECT: Review of Final Plat PE- 1522 -85, SCARANO ADDITION & PE- 1206C -78, SUMMERFIELD EAST 3RD ADDITION Enclosed please find copies of the above referenced final plat. Please review and forward any comments at your earliest convenience. Thank you. JP:dj REC dVfD M1qr 1 4 1986 6 000' agleeenizz INTEROFFICE DEMO [l ° M m RANDtI4 OFFICE OF THE PLANNING EEPMfPENT May 13 (curry (1NF R(fy) Co ▪ w 0 09 rt CD . N rr 0 (\ Z O P 0 6 r SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT r rq rt Station and Ref. to C/L p ErTir. Sub Grade Type of Material and Use L Lc .S 3 opt. Corrected E vl Field Test = PASSING' l/4 SIEVE la r71 L o L Std. No. 1 Field Test `9d -3 f 1 /Val, 4.4 I i Co ▪ w 0 09 rt CD . N rr 0 (\ Z O P 0 6 r SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT 0 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT Is 14 W N • rt /31 75 /3 sty /0 /SO /of2o I I / 11- 75 /3 +So iS430 Station and Ref. to C/L Ili 1t L3' r a-7-65- Sub Grade Z 1 1 / k C.s lc, Type of Material and Use L Opt. // // I/ t > a a s,3 opt. Corrected L iu •A ,3 4 34 L32. L .o L4 P ■ �o [ 2.5H r rt =PASS r > J A y 113/ Corr. I _ Std. No. C Fiel Test • 19s - 19z. ¢ 1978 9CS 964 Fl ,ae//er/uc G�7� A-LL&F si o %n. Awe_ �! tole/ a •■_ //ilhDsE ' - ©4'm,o e Aecl 0 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT C7 0 0 w 0 Oc rt (D (G o z 0 rt SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT Li • rt a ,. e.i z 10 /fpo Station and Ref. to C/L R 10 �1 1 Ice 3m to Sub Grade vt i a te Type of Material and Use L L Opt. k UI Opt. Corrected L L' a rt � L P I PASSING #4 SIEVE L e /3f' [ Corr. [ - Std. Na. .L Fiel Test 1 9s. 194.9J k : 1 C� t . 4 4 i C7 0 0 w 0 Oc rt (D (G o z 0 rt SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT Inter-office Communication r , OF OF COUNTY ENGINEER To From R\-/ .4/, Subject 5 if t iNA / C fl Form 327-C.R. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date / . A .cr lc' • 5•• • a . — , L- . .4 — 119_ A, an 7 PAPO 04/0 E c_co E 3 ,4,0 y'r 0 (/ s P CL u Ai 7 LEI 1- 1) - COA 11 /C ? ,. .„ . - . "4 . . :' r -' ':: , , . .r. II I' .1 n '..., 11 :' , " * .P- . ' - t ,' ' ' '''.1 • .4 r . -45 '.'4 4 r 4•": ' ';`: . . I. c ).‘ l' 'kV ..;' 9 . , ' ''. t-', 1,.. 'r . . 'P. l' v : , q . • ': ' i: ', 4 LL-ctr.k.5:,:, .. , - . 41 - 4 1 ;:tt ...-- • gire, . . ... _ ... . . ^ • :. --r_ e :0 71 : " I • - • • - ts • • • ; • fe • • , '4";-411 •„, . •••1!;i4 c-; •-• :e 44' 4 '1 417. r ". ft 4 15 : • ? .i " 7.1 4 ; ;6 ' e I • ; " !Ft - 4; 1/4 *;:: i• ' . r ; 11 4 . ;LIE • 74 '4*.;17r1,t.. S/144:cr;;;:::' . • , SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT I/o • rt /<3#o4 /2t oo / /7coo /0 / -- -50 9f 3o 8f ©o r2 S 6100 Station and Ref. to C/L F3° r3-- k k jO btl Fo ° FD to-E)- F EETrzi Sub Grade 6( /i /1 1 / if 11 1/ k Type of Material and Use L L opt. 1/ // / // /1 1 5.3 . Opt. Corrected S;/ t k Q A L 1 L P PASSING //4 SIEVE [Max. k // // // / // L / / 08.7 [ Corr. L L 1 Std. No.__j I Field Test [At6 ?2/ 103 1;/ Pge -17 ;1*. I /D2.3 982 71 5:2 1988 t 1 IzeaiLZ I Ali 4»' /Jn fliAiJi ✓o L laic W 1 °-76 Zze..r....7.4E.' — 1 Iss SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT n SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS ///o /3,40 /212 /2 1 Station and Ref. to C/L fir (a I% F lur:7(5 - Sub Grade /i Y/ c Type of Material and Use I oat. // aj 1' (i., Opt. Corrected Q Herd Test P PASSING (/4 SIEVE L __I 6e it 4/ 1/..K7 Corr. L I Std. No. 1 r- Fier Test 95.z MEM K ✓. labe_ ,IX 1 n SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS II D 3 • D' ▪ 0 Oq rt 7 (D D rt Z N. 0 V 0 1 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT � I 1 /z /.3fo¢ li ptso l / //eo / 9/So Station and Ref. to C/L ko to 10 I' ,f G ills 1 /° to to Sub Grade 1/ i /1 Type of Material and Use Opt. g L I 1 6 / h 1/ i1 Opt. Corrected N ' 2.9 s¢ y \Y [�2�I 1,5--z %.k F��sa Test - L_ 7 1r FASSINIC E C a N 4, 6,/ // Y I Corr. I Std. No. 1 1 I Field Test 017.3 K76.9�I BS' its./ bio - Its/ wry tusie :l4,.e b/amaa �p2_ aI . I,,tf Z R l u � a. , � Y 6 lea/ • ./z/A II D 3 • D' ▪ 0 Oq rt 7 (D D rt Z N. 0 V 0 1 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT cn cn 0 0 2 1// 1 • rt 12 /SO 1/ 1 75 /O *25 8f 9s 71-to A O I'iso 1 Station and Ref. to C/L F3_ F 3 11- 1 F 3� F 4-€1 F4 F 3` F 3� Fr o F -q F 4 2 to Sub Grade r of a os .d f Mol Type of Material and Use Opt. 1/ L- N / 5 ll Opt. Field PASSING Corrected Test #4 SIEVE 6.3 4.7 5.0 N N '■1 I I I L_ L. // C " k /i L k k k L fr L Corr. L - std. No. Fief Test , [ / 196 1918 197 L97z 1.3 Aid/ ' I / v �A A> [A' o o ;rte 5S /PI I .K sA 155 i cn cn 0 0 2 NO DVd3403 I/3 1t 1 i/ [AT WN /d /no O Qin° 9s/. 8 eo 6 /30 kJ's Cu 2t g0 2 /ao /f-2S" 2.5" Station and Ref. to C/L 0 101 ly F 7—° Ni t io IUD 1r 7s- Sub Grade ee � s/ 1/ k ©G — aeg.oiliieW Type of Material and Use Opt. 17 /7 6p L n / H k L Opt. Corrected N rt � Cry 14$ 4 .q 5,/ [70 L P PASSING 114 SIEVE, L L g L P L /( L - L I/ L ' L I/ n L fig_ L ./ / ` 4 1 Corr. L 1 Std. No. 0 PeeST Fief Test I7T'!_I t t 196.- �t¢ ,98 95,0 /D / 9z/ 983 Max. 1° E j 55 °/ u«z /4. ss of J 1 I r a' ss z% L X* ,/4 NO DVd3403 0 N 1 c m nN 0 z m z 4N • O - n 0 m i-" -O 0 .4 INV 1S 1 • e N ■ ? i � Nan :tAg Mar �1w DRY DENSITY - LBS. /CU. F ~ n OA • i i • - 'y r° Q O O z x on 0 v 0 z 1 P1 f1 r T • 0 z v r r_ w • • i • 0 -1 A 0 o. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS as NOII3Vd1403 MVO Z a N \ ,37 /Z /3o / /too w Q /2 100 Y 9 1 Station and Ref. to C/L to Sub Grade w V 4/ /1 // 6 - - n k Type of Material and Use opt. I 1 1 G/ r/ .5�.3 Opt. Corrected f/U ro 4.3 4 5,o L�3•L P SING PAS 1/4 SIEVE L L H [ i Corr. Std. No. Field Test 17u PS 1947 19,E 19s.8 `/ ©/sh,,.ia.r: • j Y 1 I / / L�9�v�mr, dl ✓oYHt9iA F L eara_ei A 0 o. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS as NOII3Vd1403 MVO SPOIA E COUNTY COURT HOusE Washington Mutual Savings Bank 11205 E Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 RE: Summerfield East 3rd Addition PE 1206C Dear Sir or Madam: cc: Star Brokers Tupper Att. Ken Tupper PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 May 25, 1990 Please be advised that Savings Assignment No. 012 - 854353 -6 issued by your company for roadway improvements in the above mentioned subdivision, in the current amount of $2,420.00 may now be released. If you have any questions, feel free to call our office. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P. E. Spokane County Engineer rry Si s 'lat Inspector Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 A S S I C N M E N T • For security purposes only; TUPPER, INC hereby assigns to Spokane CRt municipal corporation, the Savings )(040.4 * Number 012 854353 - in'the face amount of $ 2,420.00 DATED this GIVEN under my hand and held in and by the BANK Bank of Washington Mutual Sprague.Ave. day of This assignment is made as security for the full and faithful performance by. TUPPER, INC . of the construction of certain roads, monuments and drainage facilities in Summerfipld'Fast 3rd Adda. as specified in the typical section and roadway improvement specifications for said subdivision, dated 9/24 ', 198:and on file in the Office of •the'County Engineer. Any interest benefits under said.savings certificate shall remain the property of TUPPER, 'INC' Said savings certificate .to be released to (UPPER, INC* or any other party only with the prior written consent and agreement of Spokane County. . PROVIDED, FURTHER.,. the. undersigned does hereby authorize . WA Mutual Bank to pay over to Spokane County'allYor a sufficient portion of the moneys in the savings. certificate referenced hereinabove..upon' written documentation' being received from the SpokaneCounty Engineer indicating that the purposes for'which the savings certificate was assigned have not'been fully and faithfully performed as and a statement of that amount of .money which "the County Engineer deems necessary to complete such oblige- tion. Upon receipt of.such written documentation, TUPPER, INC. hereby authorizes BANK OF WA.MUTUAL ' to release to Spokane County that amount of money requested up to the maximum amount in the savings certificate. DATED this day of / s , 198n. , 198 Branch STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ss. On this day personally' before'me , - i- iuua - ' 9- 5 /mac / , to the known to be the individual described in and who executed'the,wiEhtn and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that -7{2_ signed the same, as '. free and volun- tary act and deed, for the uses, and purposes therein mentioned. . . and official seal this r-9 day of :o. Notary Public, In and for the State.•. of Washington, residing at Spokane,• Washington. following: Secretary PROJECT Summerfield East 3rd Add DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Drywell - Type A 2) Drywell - Type B 3} Grate - Type 1 4) Grate Type 2 5) Grate - Type 3 6) Backfill For DW 7) Concrete Inlet 8) C.M. Pipe 10" Dia. 9) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. 11) C.M. Pipe 18'/ Dia. 12) Precast Manhole 13) Solid lid 14) Ditch Excavation 15) Sod NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) 2) 3) 4) 6) 16) Monuments 17) Barricade 18) Street Signs 19) Rough Grade 20) Top Course 21) Base Course 22) Asphalt Concrete 23) Curb Type A ' 24) Curb Type B 25) Curb Type R 26) Sidewalk ■ NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 1) ) 3) 4} BOND ESTIMATE GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK NAME J Sims UNITS EA EA EA EA EA CY EA LF LF LF LF EA EA CY SF QUANITY DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL EA LF EA OTHER SUBTOTAL CY CY CY Tons LF LF LF SQ YD 97"7777777 PRICE 1250^00 !45o,00 31().u0 330.00 320.00 11.25 575.00 12.00 16.50 18.00 21^00 1435.00 300"00 29.6 8.50 160() 0.50 GRADING AND SURFACING DATE 11-Dec-89 140"00 32.00 75.00 COST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0^00 0.00 O"00 0"00 0.00 0^00 0"00 0^00 0^00 251.60 800.00 0"00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O"00 0"00 1051.60 0"00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8"50 0.00 10.60 0.00 10^60 0.00 40^00 0.00 5.60 0.00 7^10 0.00 6.50 0.00 14.00 1368"89 0.00 0.00 o^00 0.00 1368.89 GRAND TOTAL 2420.49 Inter - office CCommu nicaation To (k From 7 V r ^ Form 327 —C.R. OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date 72n, ) 2 `7 a/8 , 1922— c y c utii , vue4 tfj c_o_c_ -c (2 - cry ef2 ov /0" � Ugx4 ti ti,.,, a .1L.f ire., �1 "_f6d�ilil Washington Trust Bank P.O. Box 2127 Spokane, WA. 99210 RE: Summerfield East 3rd PE 1206 C Dear Sir or Madam: i = " Ts () cA�' 1 f C(- s( Air PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 November 30, 1989 Please be advised that Mortgage Assignment No. 4208 issued by your company for roadway improvements in the above mentioned subdivision, in the current amount of $45,000.00 may now be reduced to $12,300.00. If you have any questions, feel free to call our office. cc: Tupper & Associates, Inc. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer rry ims lat Inspector Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 - 3600 5PO'ANC COUNTY COUP: HOUSE Washington Trust Bank P.G. Box 7_127 Spokane, WA. 99210 Dear Sir. or Madam: RE: Surnrnerfield East 3rd PE 1206 C cc: Tupper & Associates, Inc. C l PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 December: 29, 1989 Please be advised that the portion of Mortgage Assignment No. 9208 issued by your company for roadway improvements in the above mentioned subdivision, in the current amount of $12,300.00 may now be released. If you have any questions, feel free to call our office. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hamann, P.E. S kane County ,Engineer Jerry Sims Plat Inspector Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 SUMMERFIFLD EAST 3RD NAME JS DATE 10/15/87 DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST 1) Drywell - Type A EA. 1175.00 0.00 2) Drywell - Type B EA. 1435.00 0.00 3) Grate - Type 1 EA. 300.00 0.00 4) Grate - Type 2 EA. 320^00 0.00 5) Grate - Type 3 EA, 310.00 0.00 6) Backfill For DW CY 9.00 0.00 7) Concrete Inlet EA" 520.00 0.00 8) C.M. pipe 10'/ dia^ LF 12.00 0.00 9) C.M. pipe 12" dia. LF 16.50 0.00 10) C.M. pipe 15" dia. LF 18"00 0"00 11) C,M" pipe 18'/ dia" LF 21.00 0.00 12) Precast Manhole EA. 1435"00 0.09 13) Solid Lid EA" 300.00 0"00 14) Ditch Excavation CY 1133 7.90 8950"70 15) Sod SF 46770 0"50 23385^00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) ROCK SUMP 2} 3) 4) 5) 6) CY 16) Monuments EA. 140.00 0.00 17) Barricade LF 20.00 0.00 1R> Street Signs EA. 75.00 0.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, & SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade CY 21) Top Course CY 20) Base Course CY 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 23) Curb Type A LF 24) Curb Type B LF 25) Curb Type R LF 26) Sidewalk SD YD NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 1) BACKFILL BEHIND CURB LS 2) 7) 4) dKANU {U|AL 44'073'20 EliaPAD �S - "F" ri� - 8 9.00 72.00 0.00 0.00 0"00 0.00 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 32407.70 OTHER SUBTOTAL 0.00 743.5 GRAND TOTAL 7.90 0.00 10.60 0^00 10.60 0.00 37.60 0.00 4.25 0.00 5.20 0.00 5.20 0.00 13.00 9665.50 1 2500"00 2500.00 0^OO 0.00 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING SUB TOTAL 12165.50 fro 0 a JAAIL '44573^20 OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER NORTH 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 509 - 456 - 3600 DAILY INSPECU ONJJ FORT urn (r /c- V/s l -. Date /t9- /Z -844 Project NameScla nie../J./ .'ad Inspector__6„S1/2- n ,?-/I Project No. CRP /RID Weather Report No. Time Charged Contractor this Day -1/2 or 1 Contractor and /or Sub(s) Other County Personnel Contractor Personnel Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 Diary Section Couonents: h ('cy Lt 0 - v 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hrs. Used Equipment List 4 1 .4 ;Let/ ine4;1704 % 1/4 INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE // _ nt/5 Number Standby IL MAMIIMEMPIT r • i. . C t • TO: Tom Yak �~' �� PROM: _ Jerry Sims DATE:May 4 DIF DIF T CODINITNC SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON SUBJECT: Summerfield East Third Addition We have received a request from the sponsor to reduce/release the bond for the above mentioned project. Please review this at your earliest possible convenience and notify me of the amount, if any, we need to retain in order to assure the completion of the project. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. T-) �� // r_ {_�j,� /,/ / /, r� ��`� �` »�,°,�, )`�� r �/ vv^ c� '/ '~^ , - �` `� ,e=2-.„../7 44% -3 - -7 `1/2 Project Name�� li % / ?J0 Inspector ja ` / d Project No. CRP /RID Weather Report No. Time Charged Contractor this Day -1/2 or 1 Contractor and /or Subs) �6 ^ C� c�, Other County Personnel . _ .� % s � Standby 1 2 3 4 .5 6 Contractor Personnel. Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 Diary Section OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER. NORTH 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 509 - 456 -3600. Equipment List Hrs. Used INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE �.' Number Date 6 Inspector i7 , v /_.,/ Weather J Time Charged Contractor this Day -IC or 1 Other County Personnel Contractor Personnel Classification 1 2 3 4 7 n Diary Section 1- 53 :C . 2AeA FR 'r, 00 3z ,a Ca. ' IO co R OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER NORTH 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 509 - 3600 1 3 4 J 6 AL-,7c7-7 lj Szt Eouinment List Project P4 ame —nth n.-74 %-- ?-',W Project No. CRP /RID PG 120 b c. Report No. Contractor and /or Subs) r 1 - /,S.., 0 cc Hrs. Used Comments" ! ' INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE t i / firlyi Number Standoy Date l— co Weather Time Charged Contractor this Other County Personnel Contractor Personnel Classification 1 2 3 4 5 Diary Section Comments] /)n-. r I I /r° N J0 70 1-4 OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER NORTH 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 509 -456 -3600 .-7 5 6 Project Name - 01.7770 °r' �N � � . _ , Project No. CRP /RID �_.. -,,-/; *y- Rdport No. P 1 10 6 b' Day -1/2 or 1 Contractor and /or Sub(s) :=K c �,-<-y i ,,.. .1=- /-= / „ i' / �: -.w ci-c. Equipment List' Hrs. Usaa Standby 1 2 3 - c - e /: c -. INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE` /en7 / z f f / / V} � +r Number '� l oar %r c r /�nr- oZ_ OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON July 19, 1988 TO: Tom Yak:e FROM: Jerry Sims SUBJ: Summerfield East 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Add. (1206 a, b, and c) We have received a request from the sponsor to reduce/ release the bond for the above mentioned projects. Attached is a letter from Verril Smale, dated Nov. 21, 1985 regarding Summerfield 1st. Addition, which indicates all that is left to do is grade and sod the swales, and install the sidewalk. Tom Joy has indicated to Tupper that the side and back yards have not been sodded. There was never any requirement to sod the side and back. yards. Tupper is also requesting a separate punch list for Summerfield 2nd Addition and another separate punch list for Summerfield 3rd Addition. They need these three separate punch lists so they can reduce or release each separate bond they have for each separate project. Please review this at your earliest possible convenience and notify me of the amount, if any, we need to retain in order to assure the completion of each separate project. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. s.o••sr COI P1TY la 4..a SL Mr. Floyd Whyatt Federal Housing Administration West 920 Riverside Spokane, WA 99201 Dear Mr. Whyatt: The construction of roads in the Plat of Summerfield East First Addition has been substantially completed and approved for acceptance by this office. Minor quantities of required drainage swales and sidewalk remain to be com- pleted and are secured by a bond from the developer. Action to formally accept the roads for maintenance is scheduled in the near future. VS /set cc: Ken Tupper Jerry Sims SionLasE ;SI surnuram 99260 November 21, 1985 RE: Summerfield East 1st Addit No. 1206A, Road File N Very truly yours, Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer e>-rit e 7 _ Engineering Administrator C.11 t3 0r COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER 9TTEST: iY • BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 85 1120 IN THE MATTER OF ESTABLISHMENT OF STREETS IN SUMMERFIELD EAST FIRST ADDITION COUNTY ENGINEER'S FILE NO. 2583 Whereas, it is deemed a public necessity and it is hereby so declared that a public road 50 and 60 feet wide be laid out and established along the following des— cribed lines to —wit: BURNS ROAD — 60 feet wide, from the North line of Wellesley Avenue North to Lot 9, Block 5 of Summerfield East 1st Addition. BROAD AVENUE — 50 feet wide, from the East line of Burns Road Easterly to Lot 2, Block 7 of Summerfield East First Addition. SUMMERFIELD COURT — 50 feet wide, from the East line of Burns Road Easterly to and including cul — de —sac. WABASH COURT — 50 feet wide, from the East line of Burns Road Easterly to and including cul —de —sac. — 50 feet wide, from the West line of Lot 1, Block 5, Easterly to the West line of Burns Road and also from the East line of Burns Road to Lot 3, Block 9 of Summerfield East First Addition. Located in the South Half (S 1/2) of Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 E.W.M. OLYMPIC AVENUE THEREBY, BE IT Washington, that the ination and a survey upon the said report law. D E P U T Y IAM E. DONAHUE K OF THE BOA �.= i� ..:..::. _r 5+ .:.: 1•.. AnrrS! MMI' X1MkiiLirNMut `d'tFW�1'rA�9iti,:.Lr/S:.u. 'n.n!:i.. Preliminary Resolution ESTABLISHMENT RESOLVED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, County Road Engineer be and he hereby is directed to make an exam — and report upon the proposed road and to set a date for hearing and cause notice thereof to be published and posted as required PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, this 24th day of December, 1985. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TABLISHMENT pc VACATION CLOSURE /' cS J A /U Ac'J c a/e i vr Ri �/ a 14fre Alturl l'd7. ,Sv 1ne< .� / O cr.. lexo4b A Section ,3S Town ship N., Range 4¢E.W.M. No. 06 (440 (, 4 Addition of Sub divisi and ott: titioned by p to County Engineer Ordered Inspection Gt I..ias ispected by Dist. Supervisor,4 )le Lines Date Received orb fl es ;timated Cost: Grade Dtal $ lat Bond: REMARKS: In force i$ 57)0°o :ONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: TRAFFIC ENGINEER:e 'LANNING ENGINEER: JTILITIES ENGINEER: RIGHT OF WAY SUPERVISOR:40/ OPERATIONS ENGINEER: A 2A� PLANNING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEER: Y? W eat COUNTY ENGINEER'S ORDER: PROCEED Drainage Drainage $ Released REVIEWED 1 }C, f/ -2740 i�r6l8� Inspector Road File No. , . _ST3 Existing Surface Type & Width toV rfi- y �tILA ./(n7 /oon PI at OK Pending File No. 44 -65 Fences Surface 50 TO R., ,4 HOLD No. Residences I3W NJ t / A-c IN < 6o. Su��uH� Oi 36 '-4c Inspection Remarks: ther Actions Necessary: Speed Cul -de -sac Vacation Dedication ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON REVERS:. (check if applicable) VACATIONS ONLY: Planning Department by Remarks: �o. 87 0166 BEFORE THE BOARD, OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON PE- 1206 -78 ZE- 202 -78 IN THE MATTER OF FILING THE FINAL PLAT ) OF SUMMERFIELD EAST 3RD ADDITION AND ZONE ) CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURAL TO R -1 LOCATED ) IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 26N, RANGE 44 E.W.M. ) SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, that the Final Plat of SUMMERFIELD EAST 3RD ADDITION A parcel of land in the Southeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 26N, Range 44 E.W.M. in Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the NE 1/4 of Summerfield East 2nd Addition, per plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 100, in the Auditor's Office of said County; thence westerly along the northerly boundary of said Addition the following three (3) courses: (1) N 89 °34'41 "W a distance of 140.00 ft; (2) N61 °16'19 "W, a distance of 56.79 ft; (3) N 89 °34'41 "W, a distance of 125.00 ft. to the easterly boundary of Summerfield East First Addition, per plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 32, in said Auditor's Office thence northerly along said easterly boundary the following seven (7) courses: (1) N 00 ° 25'19 "E a distance of 364.51 feet; (2) N 89 °56'40 "W a distance of 375.09 ft; (3) N 00 ° 03'20 "E, a distance of 120.00 ft; (4) N 32 ° 37'45 "W, a distance of 59.41 ft; (5) N 00 ° 03'20 "E a distance of 120.00 ft; (6) N 89 °56'40 "W a distance of 36.43 ft; (7) N 13 ° 55'30 "W, a distance of 75.19 ft. to the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 9 of said Addition; thence N 10 ° 11'01 "W, a distance of 74.99 ft; thence N 00 °05'00 "W, a distance of 247.50 ft; thence S 70 °53'05 "E a distance of 220.88 ft; thence S 43 °11'00 "E, a distance of 409.83 ft; thence N 39 °05'40 "E, a distance of 312.84 ft. to the southwesterly margin of the 500.00 foot wide transmission line easement described in the Easement Deed recorded in said Auditor's Office as Document No. 572309A; thence S 43 °11'00 "E along said southwesterly margin a distance of 156.15 ft. to the westerly margin of Progress Road, as it now exists 60.00 ft.in width; thence S 00 ° 25'19 "W along said westerly margin a distance of 836.25 ft. to the point of beginning more precisely described in the plat dedication, on the recommendation of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee, be, and the same hereby is approved, with the exception that the public rights of way dedicated in this plat will not be established for maintenance purposes until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a separate resolution of the Board of County Commissioners. PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE / 7 DAY OF R E S O L U T I O N BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON , 1987. RECEIVED FEB 1 8 1987 -�- +• - .ate- -- _;,,..".n�lv - SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE Washington Trust Bank P.O. Box 2127 Spokane, Washington 99210 JS:sla /PL6 RE: Summerfield East 3rd PE 1206 C Dear Sir or Madam: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 October 19, 1987 Please be advised that the mortgage assignment issued by your company for roadway improvements in the above — mentioned plat, in the amount of $123,500 may be reduced to $45,000, with respect to your No. 4208. Should you have any questions, feel free to call our office. cc: Tupper S Associates Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Jerry Sims Plat Inspector 1 Pnhlic Works Riiilrlinn / Nnrth R11 .loffersnn Street / Snnkahe. Washington 99260 -0170 15091 456 -3600 111 Washington Trust Bank Spokane County Engineers North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Attention: Mr. Robert S. Turner Gentlemen: Paul M. Koenigs Vice President January 30, 1987 RE: Tupper, Inc. Summerfield East Second Addition Our Land Loan #4208 Funds in the amount of $123,500 are being held in a special non - interest bearing account in the name of Tupper, Inc., for the purpose of assuring completion of installation of roadway surfacing, including grading and gravel, storm drainage and monuments in Summerfield East Second Addition in accordance with the drawing and specifications as submitted to and approved by the County of Spokane Engineer's office on April 8th, 1985. No funds will be disbursed from this account without the prior written authorization of the County of Spokane Engineer. In the event that the completion and acceptance of the above named improvements for maintenance by the County of Spokane are not accomplished within a period of'one year from the date of this agreement, all funds remaining in the account will be forfeited to the County of Spokane upon written request by the County of Spokane Engineer's office to Washington Trust Bank. It is understood that upon the forfeiture of the funds to the County of Spokane, that the County of Spokane will then undertake completion of the subdivision to be accomplished within twelve months from the date of the forfeiture of funds. It is further understood that in the event of any shortage of funds to complete improvements, the County of Spokane may have recourse against the original owner /developer, but not against Washington Trust Bank. It is specifically understood by the parties, that in holding funds for this development, Washington Trust Bank is not serving as guarantor, and if at the time of forfeiture, Washington Trust Bank is then the owner by virtue of foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure, than no recourse shall be had p against Washington Trust Bank as the then owner for any additional costs incurred by the County of Spokane in the completion and acceptance of the above named improvements. Washington Trust Financial Center P.O. Box,2127, Spokane, Washington 99210 (509 455 -4236 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGIL_JRS January. 30, 1987 Dated the By By Washington Trust Bank (Mortgage Company) By Ken Tupper, Pres ce President Accepted and Approved: Developer /Borrower - Tupper, Inc. 1987. Accepted and Approved: Office of Spokane County Engineer (Date) 9 7 (Date) Page 2 January 30, 1987 Spokane County Engineers North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260, Attention: Mr. Robert S. Turner Funds in the amount of $123,500 are being held in a special non - interest bearing account in the name of Tupper, Inc., for the purpose of assuring completion of installation of roadway surfacing, including grading and gravel, storm drainage and monuments in Summerfield East Third Addition in accordance with the drawings and specifications as submitted to and approved by the County of Spokane Engineer's office on April 8, 1985. No funds will be disbursed from this account without the prior written authorization of the County of Spokane Engineer. The working policy outlined by Washington Trust Bank and the release of funds upon approval of work by Spokane County is in harmony with our program. We will appreciate immediate examination of work and release funds as we will need the use of funds for payment of contractors. It is requested here that we can obatin inspection and release of funds covering the installinj.of storm drainage upon satisfactory completion of that portion of work in order to make payment for said work. Respectfully Submitted: TUPPER INC. BY Kenneth J . Tup \ f L'- \ (date) Accepted and Approve. Office of Spokane County Engineer BY (date) TUPPER & ASSOCIATES, INC., REALTORS E. 12929 SPRAGUE AVENUE SPOKANE, WA 99216 PHONE: (509) 9281991 Transameric,. �1 If �Qlle, Title Insurance Company II �� Title Services -- - REC 9 7987 Star /Tupper - E. 12929 Sprague Attn: Ken - - re: C to P, Summerfield East 3rd Addn Ltic: Inland Pacific Engineering j YOUR LOAN NO MORTGAGOR PURCHASER OUR ORDER NO SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT The following matters affect the property covered by this order: 0 Da so 1/20/87 Form No. W -AK -735 Rev. 12.73 (continued) r.)- 110704M ❑ Deed dated and recorded as file No ❑ Contract dated and recorded as file No ❑ Mortgage dated and recorded as file No ❑ Deed of Trust dated and recorded as file No ❑ Paragraph (5) No. of our preliminary commitment is eliminated. ❑ The policy is being issued in accordance with your instructions. ❑ Our inspection of the premises on x Paragraph "A" is amended to read as follows: General taxes as follows, together with interest and penalty, if any, after delinquency: Tax Account No. Year Annual Billing Amount Paid Balance Due 35644 -9087 1986 $276.87 $276.87 $0.00 1987 AMOUNTS NOT YET AVAILABLE Affects a portion of said property 35644 -9050 • 1986 $775.05 $775.05 $0.00 1987 AMOUNTS NOT YET AVAILABLE Affects portion of said property, with other property discloses ❑ Except as to the matters reported hereinabove, the title to the property covered by this order has NOT been reexamined. ❑ There has been no change in the title to the property covered by this order since 4/91/86 EXCEPT the matters noted hereinabove. (dole of lost report) at 8:00 A.M. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE CO. By Gil Doddridge pds We amend Paragraph "B" to read as follows: Assessments levied by Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3, as follows, together with interest and penalty, if any, after delinquency: Tax Account No. Year 35644 -9087 1986 1987 35644 -9050 1986 1987 Annual Billing Amount Paid $00.00 $00.00 AMOUNTS NOT AVAILABLE $312.00 $312.00 AMOUNTS NOT YET AVAILABLE Order No. GD- 130204M SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT 1st suppl dtd 1/20/87 pg 2 Balance Due $00.00 $00.00 SPOKANE COUNTY COURT MOUSE Dear Sir: i w • ROBERT S. TURNER k latt E �1 (! J � v - �^�� .. e , L COUNTY ENGINEER Smarr, - x ,Wasixxxcvrom 99260 J� n 28, /987 Subdivision Name : 5u..ninar 14 i e ` e 3 Fa A//Y..`o n Pe 1 2s C One of the requirements set forth by the Spokane County Planning Commis— sion in connection with the above — titled plat involves the filing with this office of a Street Improvement Bond. A preliminary inspection of the plat has been made by this office and the amount of the Street Improvement Bond found to be: s /23 500 5 A Street Improvement Bond in the above amount must be filed with this office prior to approval of the final plat. The bond will be released only upon satisfactory completion of the required street improvement. Please contact this office when work on the improvement is ready for inspection, or if you desire additional information or advice concerning the work. Very truly yours, Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer OFFIC OF COUNTY ENGINEER Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3600 3} 4> 5) 6) ~^- � EEC 01 EE I P Pk FROJ SUMMERFIELD 3RD ADD NAME as DATE 1/28/87 DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST 1) Drywell - Type A EA" 1175.00 • .0.00 2) Drywell - Type B EA. 1435,00 0.00 3) Grate - Type 1 EA. 300.00 0.00 4) Grate - Type 2 EA,. 320.00 0.00 5) Grate - Type 3 EA. 310.00 0,00 6) Backfill For DW CY 9.00 0.00 7) Concrete Inlet EA. 520.00 0^00 8) C.M. pipe 10" di LF ' 12.00 0.00 9) C.M. pipe 12" dia. LF 16.50 0.00 10) C.M. pipe 15" dia. LF 18.00 0.00 11) C.M. pipe 18" dia. LF 21.00 0.00 12) Precast Manhole EA. 1935,00 0,00 13) Solid Lid EA. 300.00 0.00 14) Ditch Excavation CY 1133 7.90 8950.70 15) Sod SF 46770 0.50 23385.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1} SW INLRT EA 2 200.00 400.00 o° 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 32735"70 16) Monuments EA. ' 12 • 140.00 1680.00 171 Barricade LF 20,00 - 0.00 18) Street Signs EA, 4. 75.00 300.00 ' OTHER SUBTOTAL 1980^00 GRADING. SURFACING, CURB, & SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade CY 21) Top Course CY 20) Base Course CY 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 23) Curb Type A LF 24) Curb'Type B LF 25) Curb Type R LF 26) Sidewalk SO YD NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 1) BACKFILL BEHIND WALK CY 2) 3) 4) 212l"7 10b0"8 1264.3 743.5 7.90 10.40 10.60 37.40 4.25 5.20 5.20 13,00 � 457.37 ' 7"90 16761,f3 11244"48 0"0cY 47537.68 0.00 0"00 0"00 9665.50 3613.22 • 0^00 0"00 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING SURFACING 88822'31 GRAND TOTAL 123538.01 r Inter - office Communication To / of) /v\ From Subject Form 327 -C. R. OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date STAR Y 4, 5414 rr _nopv c -=AST 3 12.0 , /-a) -0P7 An 19 1 x � i N� - 0 `TO P O V ID E l9 S C NO 4) O (//t/ T FIE r AiSY 3�D 14// y % C/ / S p T Y C- L u S \�/ MAT 1 _S LE» T r'd COWS 7 ? ( Date / 7S - 67 Inspector Weather Time Charged Contractor this Day -1/2 or 1 Other County Personnel 1 2 3 4 5 6 Contractor Personnel Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 nic,AZ. .5' /,ee S, /irvy • /l4mi u onin/- 4 U OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER NORTH 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 509 - 456 -3600 DAILY INSPECTION REPORT Equipment List Project Name.25 Project No. CRP /RID / Report No. Contractor and /or Sub(s) r. - Hrs. Used Number Diary Section // o Comments: ��.e /r/ 4 Je erns /tae /fie .A / fri,P »,r/ a ,tnje ,i L INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE „4-- R91.6" fty Standby SPO,,ANE COUnry COURT hOU5E Dear Sir: tP c'{ n . [ : flrar ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER S PEI WISE .«.Vihursvo UY 99260 na /9 8 G Subdivision Name: Sum 'me r-cie lc7 GasT One of the requirements set forth by the Spokane County Planning Commis- sion in connection with the above - titled plat involves the filing with this office of a Street Improvement Bond. A preliminary inspection of the plat has been made by this office and the amount of the Street Improvement Bond found to be: 0 C7 $ / 5 S 0 ' 0 A Street Improvement Bond in the above amount must be filed with this office prior to approval of the final plat. The bond will be released only upon satisfactory completion of the required street improvement. Please contact this office when work on the improvement is ready for inspection, or if you desire additional information or advice concerning the work. Very truly yours, Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer U FFI CN. OF COUNTY ENGINEER a = f4dJ P /2066 Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3600 7 94 ND ro �S Ill PROJ. SUMMERFIELD EAST 3RD DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY. ' PRICE COST 1) Drywell - Type A EA. 1150"00 0.00 2) Drywell - Type B EA, 6 1400.00 • 8409.00 3) Grate. - Type 1 EA, 270.00. 0.00 4) Grate - Type 2 . EA. . 290,00 ' 0.00 5) Grate - Type 3 EA^ 3 ; - 270 - 810.00 6) Backfill For D' CY 248 8.50 2108,00 7) Concrete Inlet EA. 500.00 ' 0.00 8) C.M. pipe 10" dia, LF . 12,00 0.00 9) C.M. pipe 12" dia. LF - • 16.50 0.00 10) C.M. pipe 15" dia. LF � � 18.00 0.00 11) C.M. pipe 18" dia. LF � 21.00 � 0"00 12) Precast Manhole EA. 1400.00 '0.00 13) Solid Lid EA. 270:00 0.00 14) Ditch Excavation CY 1133 .7.90 - 15) Sod . • SF • 46770 ' � 0.50 23385.00 � � . . , , 4ON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS ., . 1) SPEC SW INLET EA 2 200"00 ' 400.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 � 4) .' 0.00 5) 0.00 6) / ' 0.00 - y DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 44053.70 16) Monuments EA. 12 . 140^00 1680.00 17) Barricade LF 20.00 0.00 18) Street Signs EA. 4 7500 -300.00 � RRADiNG, SURFACING, CURB, & SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade CY .2121.7 . 7,90 1661.43 21) Top Course CY ' 1060.8- 10.60 11244.48 20) Base Cou&se ' CY_ 10.60 0"00 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 1264.3 • 37.00 46779.10 23) Curb Type A LF 3655.7 4.25 15536.73 244 Type B LF 834.5 5.20 4339.40 25) Curb Type R LF 5.20 0.00 26) Sidewalk SD YD 743.5 13.00 9665.50. NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS T - --� - � �/ /�^x� /-/ 1) v~r°~� . 2) 3> 4) NAME JS DATE 6/16/86 � OTHER SUBTOTAL 1980.00 GRADING AND SURFACING SURFACING . 104326.64 GRAND TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150360.34 PROJECT NO,- ' 1106C ,DESIGNER- JS PROJECT DESCRIPTION- SUMMERFIELD EAST 3RD STREET # 1 NAME- PROGRESS ROAD LENGTH- 841 FT" WIDTH- 15FT. BEGINNING STATION =- 517.00 ENDING STATION = 1357.88 ONE SIDE ONLY PWIDTH= 26.50 EWIDTH= 11.50, QWIDTH= 0.00 INTER # 1 `T` INCLUDED ISWIDTH =, • 40.00 SK = 8.30 " RAD = 20.00 TERM # 1 : CHOPPED � TERM # 2 : TAPER TAPER LENGTH = 20.00 ITEM SURFACE AREA- ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING STREET # 2 NAME- LUCILLE ROAD LENGTH- 774 FT. WIDTH- 36FT. BEGINNING STATION .= 531.09 ENDING STATION = 1304.65 INTER # 1 'T' INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 36.00 SK = .30 RAD = 20.00 ^ TERM # 1 : CROSS STREET EXCLUDED EW 20.00 PW 20.00 SK 0.00 RAD 20.00 • TERM # 2 : CHOPPED ITEM SURFACE AREA- ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB ITEM aI5EMldr V7.3LHV[l [O|1:BELE C.UOCHED F/SE CQGU2E CbrGHED 2O8tlec lOs COO66£ :.1.D\/DPJA EXCVAUlION STREET QUANTITIES EXISTING dlDENVFk EXI8JLIU8 cOU3 EXI2lIN8 w66Hyrl COMCHEl[ Cx(°!KEU 3,1 Djc.:E cQnbGE (..L5||EPLO LOL^ 1]1VE[ 8OVONVA [YCiTkIXM V8Et/` MEASUREMENT 13985"23 S.F. . 67 FT. . 33 FT. 0.00 FT. ,33 FT. 0.00 FT. 0.00 SY. MEASUREMENT 27307.03 S.F. .67 FT. . 33 FT. 0.00 FT. . 17 FT. 0.00 FT. STREET # 3 NAME- OLYMPIC AVE � - LENGTH~ � BEGINNING STATION = 1036.04 INTER # 1 • 'T' INCLUDED: ISWIDTH = 36.00 TERM # 1 : CHOPPED � TERM 2 : CROSS.STREET EXCLUDED EW 18.00 .. MEASUREMENT ` 19030.66 S.F. .67 FT" .33 FT. SURFACE AREA~ �� ROADWAY EXCAVATION . CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE • . . ,~_~col-l*ucn-nuuc^cmuc-raNcc-cuuoec uu ct DATE- 6/16/96 PROPOSED PROPOSED b6a.O2ED bUOMpOSED QUANTITY 345.3 C.Y. ' 172.7 C.Y. - 0.0 C.Y. 353:9 TONS 834.5 FT. 510.0 SY" . QUANTITY 674.2 C.Y. 337.1 C.Y. 0,0 C.V. 345.6 TONS PROPOSED 1454.3 FT. 542 FT. WIDTH- 36FT. ENDING STATION = 1578"10 SK = 0"00 RAD = 20.00 PW 18.00 SK .30 RAD 20.00 � QVANTITY 469.9 C.Y. 234"9t"Y. _ `��^`��'`` ‘42"2. ��|^ tht63 139 1 01b JC9O"6 C'/^ C") :2;22 2 2k' 283^T Ll^ J1T"210|1 0`0 �' J62'? C C°A' PROJECT SUMrprir Item 11 1) Drywell — Type A 2) Drywell 3) Grate — Type 1 4) Grate — Type 2 5) Grate — Type 3 i 6) Backfill for DW 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) Non Standard Drainage Items 1) 2) 3) • Page 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 96/4 Concrete inlet C C.M. C.M. C.M. Precast Manhole Solid Lid Ditch Excavation PeS Sod c 4) B 8 /�vt A Std Dwl Drainage items pipe — Type B pipe 10" dia. pipe 12" dia. pipe 15" dia. 18" dia. Bd1 Dwl Dwl BRF Units Quantity Price Cost EA EA EA EA EA CY EA LF LF LF LF EA S• cl/lc_ S ID EI,JA L� uJL�7" Sw BOND EST FORM NAME 67 L(2 ■ I � b 6 EA cY 3 3 SF "I 6 71 q s.A, 9- 8o'0 1 9 • w,dtP - Pc,� s o _ 10 pt" /A- p so) s'x l'x =�7 e. /, p-er - ( 1 , • -,c 7o A L � 4 , q 1,. t-/4)0. 07)= D68yv1 <u i2'J' -Cant /O Dia Dia Inlet Pipe Pipe DATE 1/ 1 ' /6» A?1 o i< ger Mkt-- A. 410 T3fe 3 rT 0 F _ Dia OTHER Pipe S a�l� smoke " -dll -d5e3 ?ider 13 05 - 53 / = 77(7 9J: e /3 -/aYb = SYI 5 a r ;des /rd - /o.5 = (0, dos 3 »5 -36/ c /GS rr3-)-(2 /61 �5 = (/ P7 -F-1 7s,19-I- 36, '13+/ Ao r s` IJ -o-+- 31s, +3cNS+r19511-s6,q 9g713 a? -0 al+ 409. (3 3 N 4 /s<, is -H)).,la Dear Ken: Transamerica Title Services ler Star /Tupper Realtors E. 12929 Sprague Attn: Ken RECEIVED MAY 1 6 1986 Cou, , Engineering CERTIFICATE TO PLAT continued) Transamerica Title Insurance Comps_ North 720 Argonne Road Spokane, Washington 99212 (509) 922-2222 Order No. GD- 130204M Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat of SUMMERFIELD EAST THIRD ADDITION Sms In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of Spokane County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies the title to the following described land situate in Spokane County, to wit: J LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A parcel of land in the Southeast Quarter of Section 35, T.26 N., R.44 E.W.M., in Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of Summnerfield East Second Addition, per plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 100, in the Auditor's Office of said County; thence westerly along the northerly boundary of said Addition the following three (3) courses: (1.) N.89 ° 34'41 "W. a distance of 140.00 feet; (2.) N.61 ° 16'19 1 W. a distance of 56.79 feet; (3.) N.89 °34'41 "W. a distance of 125.00 feet to the easterly boundary of Summerfield East First Addition, per plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 32, in said Auditor's Office thence northerly alcng said easterly boundary the following seven (7) courses: (1.) N.00 ° 25'19 "E. a distance of 364.51 feet; (2.) N.89 °56'40 "W. a distance of 375.09 feet; (3.) ).00 ° 03'20 "E. a distance of 120.00 feet; (4.) N.32 °37'45 a distance of 59.41 feet; (5.) N.00 °03'20 "E. a distance of 120.00 feet; (6.) N.89 °56'40 "W. a distance of 36.43 feet; (7.) N.13 ° 55'30 "W. a distance of 75.19 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 9 of said Addition; thence N.10 °11'01 "W. a distance of 74.99 feet; thence N.00 °05'00 "W. a distance of 247.50 feet; thence S.70 °53 05 "E. a distance of 220.88 feet; thence 5.43 °11''00 "E a distance of 409.33 feet; thence 11.39 ° 05'40 "E. a distance of 312.84 feet to the southwesterly margin of the 500.00 foot wide transmission line easement described in the Easement Deed recorded in said Auditor's Office as Document No. 572309A; thence 5.43 ° 11'00'.'E. along said southwesterly margin a distance of 156.15 feet to the westerly margin of Progress Road, as it now exists 60.00 feet j in width; thence 5.00 °25'19 "W. along said westerly margin a distance of 836.25 feet to the point of beginning. 35644 -9050 1984 $784.57 $0.00 1985 $794.90 $0.00 1986 $775.05 $0.00 Affects portion of this with other property 35644 -9075 1984 $448.01 $0.00 1935 $453.91 $0.00 1986 $442.56 $0.00 Affects portion of this with other property VESTED IN: OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, a national banking association, as Trustee under Agreement with Faye S. Elliott dated September 28, 1972; and MERCEDES JESKE, a married woman, as her sole and separate property. EXCEPTIONS: A. General taxes as follows, together with interest and penalty, if any, after delinquency: Tax Account No. Year Annual Billing Amount Paid Balance Due (continued) Order No. GD- 130204M Page 2 CERTIFICATE TO PLAT $784.57 $794.90 $775.05 $448.01 $453.91 $442.56 NOTE: 1986 assessed valuation: Land $57,720.00 " $33,000.00 B. Assessments levied by Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3, as follows, together with interest and penalty, if any, after delin- quency: Tax Account No. Year Annual Billing Amount Paid Balance Due 35644 -9050 1986 $312.00 $0.00 $312.00 35644 -9075 1986 $136.00 $0.00 $136.00 1. Liability for future assessments levied by Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3. 2. Reservation of mineral rights by Northern Pacific Railway in Deed dated September 1, 1883, recorded October 20, 1886, as Document No. 946, as follows: Reserving and excepting from said lands such as are now known, or shall hereafter be ascertained to contain coal or iron, and also the use of such surface ground as may be necessary for mining operations; and the right of access to such reserved and excepted coal and iron lands for the purpose of exploring, developing and working the same. PI Order No. GD- 130204M Page 3 CERTIFICATE TO PLAT 3. CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Seller: Old National Bank of Washington, as Trustee under Agreement with Faye S. Elliott, dated September 28, 1972, and Mercedes Jeske, a married woman, as her sole and separate prop- erty Purchaser: The W. Main Corporation, a Washington corpor- ation, as to an undivided 50% interest; and T.D.C., Inc., a Washington corporation, as to an undivided 50% interest Dated: April 2, 1979 Recorded: April 6, 1979 Recording No.: 7904060363 Purchaser's interest is now held of record by Tupper, Inc., a Washington corporation, as to an undivided 50% interest; and by Bruce B. Butler and Judith A. Butler, husband and wife, as to an undivided 50% interest. 4 MORTGAGE AND THE Mortgagor: Mortgagee: Amount: Dated: Recorded: Recording No.: pds cc: Inland Pacific Engineering TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Tupper, Inc. and Bruce B. Butler and Judith A. Butler, husband and wife Washington Trust Bank, a Washington banking corporation $1,250,000.00. July 19, 1984 July 20, 1984 8407200040 • Records examined as to April 23, 1986 at 8:00 A.M. TRANSA_MERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Gil Doddridge Title Officer By: 81(808 IPEolFoRm DETACH THIS STUB FOR YOUR RECORDS WITHOUT MUTILATING CHECK DATE YR. TO DATE-0G8055 STATE FED./WITH. 1 f ; I SUMMERFIELD EAST 3RD ADDN: _ . 03?48 TH I RATE I GROSS I TUPPER, INC. SUMMEREIEW ACCOUNT E. 12929 SPRAGUE AVE. SPOKANE, WA 99216 15091928-1991 PAY EXACTLY*******540**DOLLARS AND 00 CENTS I No,i SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS 3248 10 00324811' I:125 L000891: - PLAT] 63210501th 310 DEDUCTIONS \ 0 La tL— TUPPERJNC.-SUMMERNELDACCOUNT SPOKANE, NASHINGTON 05-08086 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS PLAT FOR SUMRFLD 3RD ADDN: $540.00 RECEIVED MAY43 &Ely Engineering Main Office WASHINGTON TRUST BANK Spokane, WA No. 28-8/1251 TUPPER, INC. SUMMERFIELD ACCOUNT 3248 DOLLARS CENTS1 I MO. DAY YRJ 05-08-86 -7372 sy RECEIPT h- - DateM c ' / ) . 19 8 Received From 774.4-$0 : 4 . .1.--,e . Address , A oo 1--ct i 21.41:4 0 fr n---re:27) ----- Dollars $ CO r For .:T. —,--..., A 1 Li i 2 tc ACCOUNT HOW PAID SPOKANE Cill■::TY . ::"..;.i: AMT Of ACCOUNT CASH , SPO k:::, V7 ..t/ - :,- ; , By AMT PAID CHECK 3 BALANCE DUE MONEY ORDER _ / --I 81(808 IPEolFoRm DETACH THIS STUB FOR YOUR RECORDS WITHOUT MUTILATING CHECK DATE YR. TO DATE-0G8055 STATE FED./WITH. 1 f ; I SUMMERFIELD EAST 3RD ADDN: _ . 03?48 TH I RATE I GROSS I TUPPER, INC. SUMMEREIEW ACCOUNT E. 12929 SPRAGUE AVE. SPOKANE, WA 99216 15091928-1991 PAY EXACTLY*******540**DOLLARS AND 00 CENTS I No,i SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS 3248 10 00324811' I:125 L000891: - PLAT] 63210501th 310 DEDUCTIONS \ 0 La tL— TUPPERJNC.-SUMMERNELDACCOUNT SPOKANE, NASHINGTON 05-08086 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS PLAT FOR SUMRFLD 3RD ADDN: $540.00 RECEIVED MAY43 &Ely Engineering Main Office WASHINGTON TRUST BANK Spokane, WA No. 28-8/1251 TUPPER, INC. SUMMERFIELD ACCOUNT 3248 DOLLARS CENTS1 I MO. DAY YRJ 05-08-86 South 25 Mtamont Spokane, Washington . 509 535- 1410 99202 TO: 6 axe 5 i> i DATE: / S� 798to Requested Action Remarks Please b review- of -/-h/3 find Fmeitred ,& Sincerely, INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. By: Inland I I'!.c Engineering Tratsmittal - 7 PROJECT: Su mf798[� — a /G/ &fSf h //'0 »',& • REC A Y E,VED ATTENTION: 2775 19 85 Co Gentlemen: fleeriug We are sending (enclosed ( ) under separate cover copies of the following: Description /'Blueline Prints / / Copy of Letter /4/ c4e6s /a Original Drawing / / Contract Documents / / #too 7' 35' /oit xK /O//of> / / Work Authorization / / Report / / _ 4r5y4, No. Copies Date Description Z key g Ora.° »»/ Pak / (/ ,0,5. gk 3y/ 1 9. 3y / / Information /f/ Review & Comments / / Distribution / / Written Approval / / Signature & Return / / r (gnat/ r' 0. , r ✓ - of /lu3 I'm /in¢ Lasement y off s • / G h'e hare recer && a 6Pi P4757� - . FROM AUTO INV BLOCK 15 SIDELINE PE1206C 6/9/86 ***** START • 5 INV 6 INV 7 [NV 8 9 10 11 ANGLE DIST N 0 03 20.0 E 120.0000 N 89 56 40.0 W 36,4300 N 13 55 30.0 W 75.1900 (NV N 10 11 01^0 W [NV N 0 05 00.0 W [NV S 70 53 05"0 E [NV S 43 11 00^0 E 12 INV N 39 05 40.0 E 129"8400 INV CURVE .RADIAL S 39 05 40.0 14 DELTA 8 32 59.0' LT RAD 403.3600 TAN 30.1508 L-ARC 60.1897 RADIAL S 30 32 41.0 W RP 35 CHORD S 55 10 49.5 E TAN@PT S 59 27 19.0 E' INV CURVE RADIAL N 30 32 41.0'E DELTA 78 48 42°0 RT RAD 20.0000 TAN. • 16.4316 L-ARC 27^5105 RADIAL S 70 38 37.0 E RP 37 CHORD S 20 02 58,0 E TAN@PT S 19 21 23.0 W INV CURVE RADIAL N 70 38 37.0 W DELTA 18 56 04.0 LT RAD . 488.9400 TAN 81.5330 L-ARC 161.5792 RADIAL N 89 34 41.0 W RP 39 CHORD S 9 53 21.0 W TAN@PT S 0 25 19.0 W 41 INV S 0 25 19^0 W INV CURVE RADIAL S 89 34 41"() E DELTA 89 38 01.0 RT RAD 20.0000 TAN 19.8725 L-ARC 31.2880 RADIAL S 0 03 20.0W RP � 42 CHORD S 45 14 19.5'� TAN@PT N 89 56 40c0 W 44 INV N 89 56 40.0 W � INV CURVE RADIAL'S 0 03 20.0 W DELTA 90 00 00.0 RT RAD 20.0000 TAN 20.00U0 L-ARC 31.4159 • 74.9900 247"500O 220.8800 409.8300 60.1339 25.3924 160.8450 • 7.9200 '28"1937 2&3.3800 NORTH 2534.89755 2654.89750 2654.93282 2727.91310 28O1"72173 3049.22147 2976"89992 2678.05512 2778~82492 ' 3091.87567 2744.48883 2727.26417 2720.67551 2558,57952 2562"1802O 2554.26042 EAST TO 1595.67703 ' 5 1595.79338 6 1559.36340 7 • 1541"26881 ' 8 1528.01034. 9 1527.65036 10 1736"35140 '11 2016^81242' 12 2098"68960 35 2353"04864 36 . 2148.05675 37 2137.89254 38 2156,76204 39 2618.06481 40 2129.13807 41 2129.07974 42 2554"40770 2109"08029 43 2534"40771 2109"06089 44 2534.66309 1845^68102 45 RP 2554.66308 1845.70041 46 45 CHORD N 44 56 40.0 W 28.2843. , 2554.68248 • 1825.70042 47 TAN@PT N 0 03 20.0 E 47 INV N 0 03 20.0 E 67.5500 2622.23244 1825.76592 48 IN'V CURVE RADIAL S 89 56 40.0 E DELTA 43 14 20.0 LT . RAD 175.0000 • TAN 69.3561 ":.LL-ARC 132.0657 RADIAL N 46 49 00.0 E RP 2622.40213 1650.76600 49 48 CHORD N 21 33 50.0 W 128.9540 2742.16076 1773.37035 50 TAN@PT N 43 11 00.0 W INV CURVE RADIAL S 46 49 00.0 W DELTA 6 08 12.0 RT RAD 814.9800 TAN 43.6860 L -ARC 87.2885 RADIAL S 52 57 12.0 W RP 3299.88012 2372.62746 51 50 CHORD N 40 06 54.0 W 87.2467 2808.88295 1722.15519 52 TAN@PT N 3.7 02 48.0 W INV CURVE RADIAL 8 52 57 12.0 W DELTA 51 54 03.0 RT RAD 20. 0000 TAN 9.7332 L -ARC 18.1168 RADIAL N 75 08 45.0 W '' RP 2820.93225 1738.11809 5 52. CHORD N' 11 05 46.5 W 17.5037 2826.05945 1718.78646 54 TAN@PT N 14 51 15.0 E INV CURVE RADIAL S 75 08 45.0 E DELTA 279 56 26.0 LT • RAD 50:0000 TAN 41.9992 L -ARC 244.2942 RADIAL S 4 54 49.0 W RP 2838.37743 1670.45739 55 54 CHORD S 54 53 02.0 W 64.3185 2789.06118 1666.17471 56 TAN@PT S 85 05 1 1 . 0"• E • INV CURVE , RADIAL N 4 54 49.0 E DELTA 48 14 10.0 RT RAD 20.0000 • TAN 8.9540 L -ARC 16.8376 RADIAL N 53 08 59.0 E RP 2769.13468 1664.46164 57 56 CHORD S 60 58 06.0 E 16.3447 2781.12920 1680.46574 58 TAN @PT S 36 51 01.0 E .INV CURVE RADIAL S 53 08 59.0 W • DELTA 6 19 59.0 LT RAD 864.9800 TAN 47.8530 L -ARC 95.6085 RADIAL S 46 49 90.0 W RP 3299.88022 2372.62742 59 58 CHORD' S 40 01 00.5 E 95.5599 2707.94410 1741.91192 60 TAN@PT S 43 11 00.0 E INV CURVE RADIAL. N 46 49 00.0 . DELTA 43 14 20.0 RT • RAD 125.0000 TAN 49.5401 L -ARC. 94.3 RADIAL_ S 89 56 40.0,E RP 2622.40222 1650.76596 61 60 CHORD S 21 33 50.0 E 92.1100 - 2 622..28102 1775.76590 62 TAN@PT S 0 03 20.0 W 62 INV S 0 03 20.0 W 67.5500 2554.73105 1775.70040 63 INV CURVE • RADIAL S 89 56.40.0 E DELTA '90 b0 00.0 RT RAD 20.0000 TAN. 20. 0000 L -ARC '31.4159 RADIAL_ S 0 03 20.0 W RP 2554.75045 ' 1755.70041 64 63 CHORD 5 45.03 20.0 W 28.2843 2534.75045 1755.68102 65 TAN®PT N 89 56 40.0 W -65 INV N 89 56 40.0 W 160.0000 2534.90559 1595.68109 66 • • LAT & DEP - 0.00804 - 0.00406 '66 HCLOSE S 26 48 48.6 W .0.0090 2534.89755 1595:67703 PREC =1 TO 323291 Area= 173691.27sy ft 3.9874acres FROM .ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO AUTO INV BLOCK . 13 SIDELINE PE1206C 6/6/86 ***** START ' 1971.79674 2174.79386 16 16 INV N 0 25 19.0 E 590"0300 2561.81074 2179^13899 19 " 'WV CURVE RADIAL N 89 34 41.0 W . DELTA 17 50 38.0 RT RAD 438.9400 TAN 68.9084 L-ARC 136.7011 RADIAL N 71 44 03.0 W RP 2558.57827 2618.06708 20 19 CHORD N 9 20 38.0 E 136.1493 2696"15358 2201.24415 21 TANpPT N 18 15 57.0 E INV CURVE RADIAL N 71 44 03.0 W DELTA 90 01 02.0 RT RAD 20"0000 TAN 20.0060 - L-ARC 31.4219 RADIAL .N 18 16 59.0 E RP . 2689.88506 2220.23640 22 21 CHORD N 63 16 28"0 E • 28.2885 2708.87543 2226.51064 23 TANTPTS 71 43 01"0 E INV CURVE ' • RADIAL S 18 16 59.0 W DELTA' 10 23 47.0 LT RAD . 403"3600 TAN 36.6958 73.1902 RADIAL S 7 53 12.0 W RP 3091.87312 2353,04937 24 23 CHORD 8 54 54.5 E 73"0898 2692.32834 2297.70272 25 •TAN@PT 8 82 06 48"0E' . INV CURVE RADIAL N 7 53 12.0 E DELTA 82 32 07.0 RT RAD 20.0000 TAN 17.5504 " L-ARC 28.8102 RADIAL 5 89 34 41.0 E RP 2672.51751 2294"95844 26 25 CHORD S40 50 44.5 E 26.3831 2672"37022 2314.95789 27 TANTPT 8 0 25 19.0 W 27 INV 8 0 25 19.0 W 701.5900 • 1970.79925 2309"79121 28 28 INV N 89 34 41.0 W 135.0000 1971.79342 2174^79487 29 LAT & DEP ' . 0"00331 -0.00101 29 HCLOSE N 16 58 51.9 W 0.0035 1971.79674 2174.79386 16 PREC=1'TO 489726 Area=97283^67sq ft 2.,2333acres - ' FROM ANGLE AUTO INV PLAT BOUNDARY PE1206C ***** START • 1 INV N 0 25 19,0 E 2 INV N 89 56 40^{} W . 3 INV N 0 03 20.0 E 4 INV N 32 37 45.(Y W 5 INV N 0-03 20.0�E 6 INV N 89 56 40.0 W 7 INV N 13 55 30.0 W 8 INV N 10 11 01.0 W 9 INV N 0 05 00"0W 10 INV S 70 53 05.0 E 11 INV S 43 11 00.0 E 12 INV N 39 05 40.0 E 13 INV S 43 11 00.0 E 14 INV S 0 25 19.0W 15 INV N 89 34 41.0 W 16 INV N 61 16 19.0 W ^^ DIST 6/6/86 364,5190 375.0900 120.0000 59.4100 120.0000' 36.4300 75.1900 74.9900 247.5000 220"8800 409.8300 312.8400 156.1500 836.2500 140.0000 56.7900 NORTH 2000.00000 2364.50012 2364.86381 2484.86376 2534.89755 2634.89750 2654.93282 2727.91310 . 2801.72173 3049.22147 2976.88992 2678"05512 2920.85260 2806.99306 1970.76574 1971.79674 1999.09302 17 INV N 89 34 41.0 W 125.0000 2000.01355 1999.99747 18 , LAT & DEP -0.01355 0"00253 ^18 HCLOSE S 10 33 26.6 E 0.0138 2000.00000 2000,00000 PREC=1 TO 270707 Area=496580,61sq ft 11.3999acres EAST TO 2000.00000 1 2002"68434 , 2 1627.59452 1627.71088 4 1595.67703 5 1595.79338 6 . 1559.36340 7 1541.26881 8 1528.01034 9 1527.65036 10 1736.35140 11 2016,81242 12 2214^68950 13 2320.94842 14 2314.79006 15 2174.79386 16 2124.99409 17 1 FROM ANGLE DIST ' NORTH EAST TO AUTO INV CENTERLINE BFLLFVUE,COURT PE1206C 6/9/86 ***** START 2509.70865 1800.65225 88 88 INV ` N 0 0320"0 E 112.5500 ' 2622.25859 1800.76138 91 INV CURVE RADTAL S 89 56 40.0 E . DELTA 43 14 20.0.LT RAD 150~0000 TAN 59.4481 . ' 113,1'991 • RADIAL N 46 49 00.0 E: RP 2622.40404 1650.76145 ' 92 ^ 91 CHORD N 21 33 50.0 W 110.5320 2725.05429 1760.13661 93 - TAN@PT N 43 11 00.0 W INV 'CURVE • RADIAL S 4649 00.0 W DELTA 9 53 49^0' RT • RAD 839.9800 ` TAN 72.7276 L7ARC 145.0933 RADIAL S 56 42 49.0 W R 3299.88203 2372.62291 94 ' � 93 CHORD N 38 14 05.5 W 144"9130 2838.88064 1670"45191 95 • T8N@PT N 33 17 11.0 W ' "LAT & DEP ` ~0.00320 0.00548 .95HCLOSE 8 59. 40 04.9 E 0.0063 2838"87743 1670.45739 � � 9REC=1 .TO 58445 . ND AREA 55 FROM ANGLE AUTO INV OLYMPIC AVE CENTERLINE ***** START 84 INV N 89 56 40.0 W 88 INV N 89 56 40.0 W 89 INV N 32 37 45.0 W LAT & DEP 90 HCLOSE S 8 11 30.8 E PREC=1 TO 50478 ' DIST NORTH EAST ' . TO PE1206C 6/9/86 2509.36627 2153.75208 ' 353.1000 2509.70865 1800.65225 188.9600 2509.89187 : 1611.69234 29.7050 2534"90876 1595.67542 0"0113 NO AREA -0.01121 2534"89755 0.00161 1595.677o3 84 88 89 90 FROM ANGLE. DIST AUTO INV ' CENTERLINE PROGRESS RD & LUCILLE ROAD PE1206C 6/9/86 ***** START 2752.80855 2196^73971 77 INV CURVE RADIAL S 24 44 58.0 W DELTA 24 19 39.0 LT RAD 773,3600 TAN 80,4761 L-ARC 158"5268 RADIAL S 0 25 19.0 W RP 3091.87441 2353^04723 76 77 CHORD S 77 24 51.5 E TAN�PT S 89 34 41"0 E � 75 INV S 0 25,19.0 W 80 INV. G 0 25 19.0 W 81 INV N 89 34 41.0 W 82 INV N 0 25 19"0 E� 83 INV N 0 25 19.0 F. 84 INV . N 0 25 19 E . ' INV CURVE RADIAL N 89 34 41.0 W DELTA 24 19 39.0 RT RAD ' 463.940Q TAN 100.0002 L-ARC 196.9866 RADIAL N 65 15 02.0 W' RP 85 CHORD N 12 35 08.5 E TAN@PT N 24 44 58.0 E 157.3387 748.0000 115.0000 195.0000 128.4700 523,9300 52.6400 195^5102 NORTH 3091.87441 2718.52453 197o~54481 1855.54793 1856.98396 . 1985.45048 2509.36627 2562.00484 2558.58827 2752.81718 LAT &.DEP � -0.00863 -0.00162 '87 HCLOSF E 10 36 42.0 W 0.0088 2752.80855 ' 2196.73971 77 PREC=1 TO 241299 Area=168743.34sq ft 3,873Bacres EAST ' TO 2350.29771 75 2344"78925 80 2343.94236 81 2148"94764 82 2149.89373 83 2153.75208 84 2154.43974 85 2618.06716 86 2196"74133 87 FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO AUTO INV CENTERLINE CROWN AVE PE1206C 6/9/86 • ***** START ' 2718.52453 235O,2977� 75 INV CUF(VE � RADIAL S 0 25 19,0 W DELTA 24 19 39.0 RT RAD 373.3600 . TAN 80.4761 L-ARC 158.5268 RADIAL S 24 44 58.0 W `• RP 3091.87441 2353.04723 76 75 CHORD N 77 24 51.5 W 157.3387 2752.80855 2196.73971 77 TAN@PT N 65 15 02.0 W INV CURVE � RADIAL S 24 44 58^0 W ' DELTA 14 2O'42"0 RT RAD 373.3600 ' TAN 46.9843 L-ARC 93.4772 RADIAL S 05 40.0 W � RP 3091.87441 2353"04723 76 ' 77 CHORD N 58 04 41.0 W 93,2332 2802.10689 2117.60620 78 TAN@PT N 50 54 20.0 W 78 INV N 39 05 40,0 E. 153..0000 2920"85134 2214.09809 79 _ =�� LAT & DEP. 0.00126 0�00142 79 HCLOSE N 48 19 41.0 E 0.0019 • 2920.85260 2214"O8950` 13 PREC=1 TO 213761 NO AREA FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH • EAST ' TO AUTO INV CROWN AVE CENTERLINE PE1206C 6/9/86 ****$ START ' 2718.52453 2350"29771 75 INV CURVE ' RADIAL S 0 25 19^0 W :DELTA -38 40 21"0 • RAD 373.3600 ` TAN' 131.0141 L-ARC. 252.0040 RADIAL S 39 05 40.0 W RP ' • . 3091.87441 2353"04723 76 75 CHORD N 70 14 30.5 W 2472175 2802^10689 : 2117.60620 78. TAN@PT N 50 54.20^0 W 78 INV N 39• 05 40.0 E 153"0000 2920.85134 2214.08809 79 '~'`_______ LAT & DEP 79 HCLOSE N 48 19 41.0 E PREC=1 TO 213761' 0.0019 NO AREA 0^00126 0.00142 2920.85260 2214^08950 13 FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO AUTO I MV , BLOCK 16 SIDELINE. PE1206C 6/9/86 ***** START 292O.85260 2214^08950 13 13 INV, S 43 11 00,0 E 148.7000 2812.27953 2315^98699 67 67 INV S 0 25 19.0 W 38.7900 2773.49058 2315.70133 68 INV CURVE RADIAL p 89 34 41.0 E DELTA 99 47 35.0 RT RAD 20.0000 TAN �23^7478 L-ARC 34^8343 RADIAL S 10 12 54.0 W RP 2773.63787 2295.70187 69 68 CHORD S 50 19 06.5 W 30.5953. 2753.95488 2292.15502 70 TAN@PT N 79 47 06.0 W INV CURVE ' RADIAL S 10 12 54.0 W 'DELTA 28 52 46"0 RT • RAD 343.3600 , TAN 88^4136 L-ARC 173"0677 RADIAL S 39 05 40^0 RP ' 3091.87236 '2353.04731 71 ' .70 CHORD N 65 20A3.0 WL 171.2414 2825.38807 2136.52430 72 TAN@PT 50 54 20.0 W • 72 INV N 39 05 40"0E 123,0000 2920.84930 2214.08817 73 'LAT & DEP 0.'00331 0"00133 73 HCLOSE N 21 56.34.7 E' 0.0036 2920"85260 2214.08950 • PREC=1 TO 145398 Area=16311.58sq ft 0.3745acres 13 FROM ANGLE --'--'`^ AUTO INV BLOCK 14 SIDELINE PE1206C 6/9/86 ***** START 000.00000 1 INV N 0 25 19.0 E 364"5100 2364"50012 2 INV N 89 56 40.0 W 375.0900 , 2364"86381 3 INV N 0 03 20.0 E 120.0000 2484.86376 4 INV S 89 56 40.0 E 480.7200 2484.39764 • INV CURVE RADIAL N 0 03 20.0 E DELTA 90 21 59.0 RT RAD 20"0000 TAN 20"1283 L-ARC 31"5438 RADIAL 8 89 34 41.0 E RP 30 CHORD S 44 45 40^5 E • TAN@PT S 0 25 19.0 W 32 INV S 0.25 19.0 W. 33 INV N 89 34 41"0 W � • ^ „ nIST NORTH EAST TO , -.__-___-.~`-___-___~_ ________ • • . 2464.39765 28"3746, 2464.25036 465.1800 . 1999.09298 125"0000 2000^00351. 2000.00000 2002.68434 1627.59452 1627.71088 2108.43065 � 4 30 2108"41126 31 2128.41071 2124"98501 33 1999"98840 34L - 7 o � LAT & DEP � ' -0.00351 0.01160 34 HCLOSE S 73 10 26^8 E 0,0121 2000.00000 2000.00000 1 PREC=1 TO 161913 Area=105577.66sq ft 2.4237acres .. , BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION ) OF TIME REQUEST FOR PE- 1206 -78 ) FINDINGS OF FACT SUMMERFIELD EAST, AN APPROVED ) CONCLUSIONS AND PRELIMINARY PLAT ) DECISION THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Ken Tupper, has been received and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter III, Section G) and RCW 58.17.140. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning. 2. The original proposal was to subdivide approximately 91 acres into 268 lots for single family dwellings and a zone reclassification from Agricultural (A) to Single Family Residential (R -1). 3. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on January 30, 1979. 4. The proposal is generally located north of Wellesley Avenue, south of Forker Road and west of Progress Road in Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 E.W.M. Spokane County, Washington. 5. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5), previously established as Agricultural (A) zoning in 1961 and redesignated to Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) on January 1, 1991 consistent with the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. The current Urban Residential -3.5 (UR- 3.5) zoning of the subject property is consistent with the original zone reclassification to Single Family Residential (R -1). 6. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. Portions of the preliminary plat adjacent to Forker Road are affected by the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan. Implementation of the arterial road plan will require reservation of a Future Acquisition Area and special setbacks adjacent to Forker Road. 7. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and department policy for short subdivisions. These criteria are found in Chapter III, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this decision. Section G states, "Approval of a preliminary subdivision shall automatically expire three years after preliminary approval is granted unless a time extension is applied for." and follows with "Upon application for time extension , the Planning Director or designee may administratively approve extensions for up to three (3) year periods provided at least one of the following circumstances is fount to apply:" The following are the relevant sections of Section G and the Planning Department response: 1. That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the last extension was granted and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval; RESPONSE: Four phases of the original preliminary plat have been finalized for a total of 135 lots with 133 lots remaining to be finalized. Additional phases have not been submitted for final plat review. 2. That the preliminary plat as approved remains consistent with the Generalized Comprehensive Plan for Spokane County insofar as density AND other development provisions apply, and the sponsor has taken substantial steps towards finalizing his plat, which shall include but not be limited to: a. surveying the lots within the development, b. arranging for public services to the site, RECEIVED JAN 1 2 1996 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEEF Extension of Time Findings PE- 1206 -78 Page 2 c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary plat, d. the completion of studies or other requirements which were part of preliminary plat approval; RESPONSE: The applicant has indicated that engineering and design reports for construction of a storm water management system for managing 100 -year flood events have been submitted to Spokane County for review. In addition, the applicant has sought changes to the identified 100 -year flood plain boundary 3. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This provision shall not apply to public utility extension which the project sponsor would normally fund. RESPONSE: Not applicable. 8. No additional conditions have been recommended by the various reviewing agencies and departments, including the County Engineer's Office, County Health District, County Utilities and the Department of Building & Safety. 9. This is the eighth request for a time extension. The total life of the preliminary plat has been approximately 16 years. 10. The following facts are also relevant. a. The applicant has demonstrated substantial progress towards finalizing the remaining portions of the preliminary plat. Therefore, a three -year extension of time is warranted. 11. The applicant/owner should show continued progress toward complying with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time. DECISION BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request for application PE- 1206- 78/ZE- 202 -78 is hereby APPROVED until February 1, 1999. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (UPDATED) 1. The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record. 2. The preliminary subdivision shall comply with the Urban Residential -3.5 (UR -3.5) zone as amended. 3. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. 4. The Planning Director /designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 5. A final plat name shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name /number to be approved by the Planning Director /designee. 6. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. 7. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 8. The preliminary plat is given a time extension for three (3) years, specifically to February 1, 1999. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request approximately forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. Extension of Time Findings PE- 1206 -78 Page 3 9. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 10. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 11. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 12. The Spokane County Planning Department shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following: a. At least 20 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities, in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right -of -way along Forker Road. b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area. c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road right -of -way and utilities. If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made. d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses. 13. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement for those lots located on a stub road or temporary cul -de -sac: "Lot(s) [ ] , Block(s) [ ] are located on a temporary cul -de- sac /stub road. This temporary cul -de- sac /stub street may be extended to provide access to adjacent property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as development and/or circulation needs dictate." 14. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul -de -sac Lots which meet or exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat. 15. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. 16. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 17. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision or binding site plan, and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 18. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state - licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat," including a signed license stamp. The certification Extension of Time Findings PE- 1206 -78 Page 4 may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as- built" water system. 19. The Water Plan and the above four (4) conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director /designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 20. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 21. Subsequent extension of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial compliance with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance; otherwise the preliminary subdivision approval will become null and void. 22. That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink fence around the entire periphery of the retainage basin in the storm drainage plan. 23. That all construction will be monitored by the Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority to insure compliance with air pollution requirements and control techniques. 24. That the sponsor limit the construction activities from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 25. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curbs (in addition to those required along the pathways) and bike paths along the plat boundaries of Progress Road, and Wellesley Avenue as required and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 26. That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink fence along the approximately 900 feet common lot line shared by this proposal and property owned by Tony Danelo, prior to any finalizing of any phase of this project. Mr. Danelo's property is legally defined as West Farms Irrigated Tracts Plat #4, Blocks 113 and 112. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT (UPDATED) 1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. Plans, profiles, and cross- sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as- built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right -of- way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 6. All construction within the existing or proposed public right -of -way is to be completed prior to filing each final plat, or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "as- built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 7. No direct access from lots to stub road connections until such roads are constructed to County standards and established as county roads. 8. Road design, construction, and drainage control for one -half (1/2) rights -of -way and stub road connections are the responsibility of the owner, developer or applicant. Extension of Time Findings PE- 1206 -78 Page 5 9. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which resolution establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 10. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to Wellington Avenue, Forker Road, and Progress Road. 11. Dedication of 20 feet of additional right -of -way along Progress Road is required. 12. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at Progress Road. Design standards for neighborhood collection arterial should be used. 13. That the sponsor provide 50 foot radius cul -de -sac rights -of -way. 14. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curb along pathway routes as designated by the County Engineer, and shown on the preliminary plat of record, and along Wellesley Avenue. 15. That the sponsor provide stub road connections, to the west, to access center of Tract 103 and south line of Tract 113 in West Farms Irrigated Tracts. 16. That the sponsor assume responsibility for reconstruction of Progress Road should flooding, caused through activities of the plat, cause damage to that road. 17. That the stub roads to the west be barricaded, by the sponsor, in a fashion acceptable to the Spokane County Engineers. 18. There shall be no further finalization of phases until engineering work is completed to evaluate the impact of storm water runoff from Forker Draw as predicted in newly released FEMA maps and reports. Storm water management plans shall be developed prior to finalization of any further phases. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT (UPDATED) 1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any attached sheets as noted. 2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each lot of the plat. 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. Extension of Time Findings The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County/City of Spokane, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot/tract purchaser refused a building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 10 Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that suitable sites for on -site sewage disposal systems are available on all lots within the approved preliminary plat not already finalized. 11. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health officer, the use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems may be authorized. 12. The dedicatory language of the plat will state: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of on -site sewage systems may be authorized." 13. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state. "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 14. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system, as approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire district and purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on- site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Each new dwelling unit shall be double - plumbed for connection to future areawide collection systems. DATED THIS / 1 DAY OF JANUARY, 1996. 'II HN PE i RS Senior Planner PE- 1206 -78 Page 6 Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with the appropriate processing fee payable to the Spokane County Planning Department, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456 -2205. c: Division of Engineering Division of Utilities County Health District Division of Building and Planning Ken Tupper, Windermere Realty, 12929 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane, WA 99216 Inland Pacific Engineering, 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200, Spokane, WA 99204 I\ OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGLNEER • Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer December 9, 1993 Richard Mason Inland Pacific Engineering Co., Inc. South 25 Altamont Street Spokane, WA 99202 Dear Richard: W. 1026 Broadway Ave. RE: Summerfield East /Flood Control Facilities A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director 1. What is the connection of the proposed ponds to the Forker /Progress Road drainage facilities? This needs to be shown on the plan. Spokane, WA 99260 - 0170 (509) 456 -3600 FAX (509) 456 -4715 Your letter of November 2, 1993 outlined your proposed approach to the design of flood control facilities for Summerfield East. We have reviewed your approach and have several questions, concerns and comments. 2. We are concerned that if water depths will be from 4 to 10 feet that the ponds will be a hazard unless fenced. 3. You propose "one or multiple culverts sized to prevent overtopping of the dikes" and "one double drywell in the bottom" of each cell. We do not agree that routine maintenance will not be needed. You need to prepare a maintenance plan for the ponds, drywells and culverts, determining how often maintenance is required to keep the facilities functioning at the capacities you have designed them. The access to the ponds for maintenance needs to be described and identified on the plan. 4. Before the County would accept ownership of the ponds, we would need a maintenance plan, clear access to the facilities, an agreement whereby all those benefitted by the ponds will pay for the pond maintenance and insurance and legal review by our attorneys of the potential liabilities to the County and the BPA restrictions placed on the area. You need to determine what area will be included in the maintenance agreement with the County. For these types of agreements, we generally notify each property owner affected. The Board of County Commissioners holds a public hearing before signing the agreement. letter to richard mason summerfield east 12/9/93 page 2 5. We cannot agree that "No special provisions would be required for lots located in the Zone 'B' flood hazard area." In Spokane County B zones are treated the same as A zones during the building permit process. This means floodplain development permits will be required for homes in the B zone as well as in the A zone. If FEMA approves a Letter of Map Revision and removes the B zone from the map and designates the area as a C zone, then no special provisions would be required for the area. 6. We agree that the approved facility must be completed prior to the finalization of all remaining lots in Summerfield East. We will also require that the applicant supply all documentation to FEMA for a Letter of Map Revision, i. e. all information necessary to have Summerfield East removed from the flood zone within one year of completion of the facility. We expect that FEMA will require the applicant to address the issue of debris removal. If that issue or others determined by FEMA requires the construction of facilities in addition to those already constructed by the applicant, then the applicant must construct whatever facilities are necessary to get the flood zone designation removed from the area by FEMA. 7. How will the matter of water quality be addressed? Under the 1987 amendments to the Federal Clean Water Act, we do not expect to be allowed to use drywelis, sumps or other facilities that do not provide some pretreatment of stormwater before it is discharged to the ground or surface waters. If you are proposing vegetation for the ponds, please state that clearly. These issues need to be addressed as we move toward providing an environment in Summerfield East that is reasonably safe from flooding. If you have questions about any of these, please call Bill Hemmings or Brenda Sims. Sincerely, on Hormann, P. . County Engineer drain /sumeast November 2, 1993 Spokane County Engineers 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, Washington 99260 Ili Attention: Ron Horman, County Engineer Re: 100 Year Flood Control for Summerfield East SPSI(ANE CO•f>Y ENGINEER INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. 'South 25 Altamont Street ' Dear Ron:*.. Spokane, Washington 99202 •(509)'535 -1410 For the past eighteen months I have been working with Mr. Ken Tupper to develop a plan that will control flood waters expected to flow down the Forker draw and allow the continuation of development of the preliminary plat of Summerfield East. To date we have: Solicited and received flood study maps from FEMA which detail the extent and depth of the 100 year flood expected on the Summerfield property. Met with FEMA and Corps of Engineers representatives in Seattle to assist our understanding of alternate solutions to the problem. Elected to develop a flood control solution which will divert flood waters from the area of Summerfield East proposed for residential lots to the area within -the BPA powerline,easement. Dug soil test holes and conducted low -ring percolation tests. Had several meetings, most recently with Bill Hemmings and Jim Radke with the County Engineer's Office, and with Mark Story with Howard Consultants to develop ideas concerning the size, location, configuration and allowable . percolation rates for the facilities to be proposed. Coordinated with BPA to develop a retention solution within the power line easernent.which is acceptable to BPA. ::,..Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Environmental Analysis RECEIVED NOV 0 2 1993 At this point we have developed a preliminary retention pond configuration which is acceptable to BPA. A blueprint depicting this pond configuration is attached for your consideration. The criteria we intend to utilize to develop a detailed working design of the retention ponds is as follows: 1. The inflow hydrograph for the 100 . year flood will be one developed by FEMA having a peak flow of 588.88 cts (printout attached for your review). We do not plan any additional flood studies of the Forker draw. Surface water flow from the 100 year storm will be allowed to enter the 'retention facilities by overtopping Progress Road. We plan no revisions to either.ProgressRoad or Forker Road which would allow the 100 year storm flow to pass under the travel way. Retention ponds will be formed utilizing earth dikes constructed from native material. Maximum interior dike slopes will be 5:1: No fencing is planned. 4. Retention water depths will range from 4 to 10 feet. The entire . 100 year storm volume will be stored or allowed to percolate. ':Percolation rates used for design will be 6.70 in /hr and is based on the average .direct readings of tests 1, 2 and 3 performed by Howard ;Consultants :, (Tests attached for your information.) Each cell of the retention facility will be connected to the adjacent - downstream cell with one or multiple culverts sized to prevent overtopping .of the dikes. . . Each cell of the retention facility will have one double drywell in the bottom to keep the facility drained. Each 'cell will drain within 72 hours. After construction of the dikes the surface will be planted with dryland grass. Routine maintenance is not planned. Cell #4 will be excavated to a depth which will expose the naturally occurring sand and gravel. This depth is expected to be approximately 6 feet below natural ground. The total depth of cell #4 could be 10 feet. The depth of all other cells will be determined by balancing cut and fill quantities but will not be less than 4 feet. The freeboard allowed on each cell will be 6 inches. 10. Ownership of the ponds will be turned over to the County. Activities the County may wish to perform within the retention facilities will be subordinate to provisions of the BPA powerline easement. Please review and comment on the criteria outlined above. We need to have your written concurrence of the design criteria before we begin our design effort. When the approved facility is completed we expect to be able to finalize all remaining lots in Summerfield East with consideration given only to a 10 year storm for local drainage facilities. No special provisions would be required for lots located in the Zone "B" flood hazard area. We would be required to certify that finished floor elevations are at least one foot above the flood elevations established for Zone "A ". Zone "A" flood elevations will be based on FEMA's work map attached for your information. Finally . we would ask for the County's cooperation in . submitting a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) to FEMA to eliminate the Zone "A" designation in the residential area after all flood control facilities are complete. Very truly yours, Richard L. Mason, P. E. cc: Bill Hemmings Brenda Sims Enclosures: Preliminary Pond Layout 100 year Flood Hydrograph FEMA Work Map FEMA Final Map with Summerfield East overlaid Low ring Percolation Tests Fax Transmittal Memo 7672 To Company Location Fax # Comments Ity (pr / / Fr I 4 /((-.:H. /ylwls2o ✓ "'S.. f/I/F1 /'en. 0 r / • 'P I � / e .:�f 11 � IeItphnnn 1 t yL 7. n , , /1., ZJSS r . u 1 G4 6.7 flr 1 '/c - 525 - ,,,, Nn. of{age From Company Lecaupn Fax# Ikigmel ( . ❑Destro Disposition Tocroa Dole —/ v ' Time 4/ : G c Oepl. Charge Telephone I O Relmn 0 Call for pickup o 2 2u - o //0 -Sinn •r /a 1 ws7 l6 I` L '1c P,7f \ 1 /fL - ) .7 S ILII. / ti'.(� �� /�� POND -2 Version: 5.15 S /N: 1295160123 >>>» HYDROGRAPH PRINTOUT ««< 03 -20 -1991 17:05:51 Hydrograph file: C: \PONDPACK \FORKER .HYD Time Hours HYDROGRAPH ORDINATES (cfs) . Time increment = 0.100 Hours Time on left represents time for first Q in each row. 8.000 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.10 8.700 0.15 0.21 0.28 0.37 0.46 0.57 0.69 9.400 0.82 0.95 1.10 1.26 1.43 1.61 ,1.81 10.100 2.01 2.22 2.45 2.69 2.95 3.24 3.56 10.800 3.92 4.35 4.87 5.55 6.44 7.60 9.08 11.500 10.93 13.43 17.02 23.56 40.95 84.32 161.57 12.200 268.50 388.74 488.26 557.83 588.88 581.55 546.60 12.900 496.28 443.12 393.10 349.06 310.63 276.65 247.45 13.600 223.30 203.24 186.21 171.51 158.82 147.56 137.54 14.300 128.78 121.02 114.15 108.00 102.36 97.21 92.40 15.000 88.09 84.25 80.92 78.10 75.66 73.51 71.50 15.700 69.57 67.76 66.07 64.54 63.23 62.13 61.24 16.400 60.53 59.97 59.48 58.93 58.27 57.41 56.43 17.100 55.37 54.30 53.30 52.42 51.70 51.13 50.71 17.800 50.37 50:01 49.54 48.85 47.95 46.92 45.84 18.500 44.77 43.80 42.98 42.31 41.80 41.42 41.13 19.200 40.91 40.76 40.65 40.58 40.54 40.51 40.48 19.900 40.34 40.02 39.43 38.57 37.58 36.51 35.46 20.600 34.49 33.66 32.99 32.47 32.07 31.76 31.53 ,21.300 31.37 31.24 31.16 31.09 31.05 31.02 31.00 22.000 30.99 30.98 30.98 30.99 31.00 31.01 31.02 22.700 31.04 31.05 31.07 31.09 31.11 31 31.16 23.400 31.08 31.20 31.22 31.25 31.25 31.12 30.81 24.100 30.06 28.69 26.72 24.00 20.91 17.68 14.56 24.800 11.70 9.24 7.23 5.63 4.39 3.43 2.69 25.500 2.13 1.70 1.37 1.12 0.92 0.75 0.62 26.200 0.51 0.43 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.21 0.18 26.900 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.05 27.600 0.04 0.04 - 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 28.300 0.01 0.01 0.00 O 3NOZ 0 D 0 • ' 11 r -I ! ,._ : i i ' op ,---- I I - 1 1 • 'Jo '-- 1 ' ' i • '' , r1 ! ! • • . ■ : i ,,;(1.- .. 0 Li Co , , 3 ' : A Cl V ri itin ; il. ,r_ i _ Li ion. li H(LI 0 1 0 Lipr!,. - Lu: !I H---iffra 0 , c._ .„ A,,u,,,, 1 ie I' LOZ •c• , IWEiv. I i t- ; I I I id / ■ / 'II ! i i l 7 ,-- , ri 0 H ' \ :.• , I !II 1 I C A i r- ' c __ GC:SY ! I ! ) - , 'UV. • \ ir ---1 ;.; , ( 23 u I - I Erj1 - I i n ri 1 I • 1 I 11 Fr i !I ! ! 1_1 111in 1 ni 11 t:I ' ID : tri" I I 1 7 ilcr I -.. L . , \ L L I :(1,1 14 1y 1 J d! f m er ---. 5— , 1., c 1-11 IL:di I 1 .1 0 0 r 9707 • \ ....1 c C I , c) P i II i indehl ! ' I 1 cl 1 1 L • ()Ns 0 ct 0 Z. • t.I , . . ------..--..\\„ ( _, . !Po e,.!: \ -j - I_ _SI, " ,, 1 ,f0,... ! 0\ 1 ■ftll --\, / ) \ ---.... _: \ , ,z! , ..,,,.....i. , ...„_,,,. -- -,.-----,-no -‹ \. "--c; -- / J / - . . e --- ---, . ! 010. . / ' --,.,.... \ • .. IN!! SNVH I / I 0 • rc 2 0 Z • L TI I • • • 1_,J) 1 , 1 / 2 If! I j r 1 (7 Lip C3 09 0 corm: z•-• '9204 I P.'L , El' 0 oi b n I r hi'07.• , u 1 : !...11 .. )D 0 -' 01- 0 CI ( -9 vtt • not- • Oct() Z • • Fi n L n 0 r _11001:0; - Si 11 ED 0 • \ Qiv. • r 0 6f - Oro e — t•QCOZ • • 1 ' 11 1 SNv tt 1 0 • ft-, P0,9 6F 1 -7-- czi O. Lo 133 0 j r1. 0 ir= 1 ri o 0 0 1 D \ j - -I , ,I7 L! ..• . .. - , _ n - -. 1 0 I t -- ) 0 9 e= 0 n • •, 0 ED dN. 0 cc ZONE A ZONE C ZONE C 0 Q 0 a S P O K A N' F_ j .,:. i C> . '7� ti: - 5b •; C O U N T' OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer December 9, 1993 Richard Mason Inland Pacific Engineering Co., Inc. South 25 Altamont Street Spokane, WA 99202 Dear Richard: W. 1026 Broadway Ave. A DIVISION OF TI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director RE: Summerfield East/Flood Control Facilities RECEIVI�. DEC Your letter of November 2, 1993 outlined your proposed approach to the design of flood control facilities for Summerfield East. We have reviewed your approach and have several questions, concerns and comments. 1. What is the connection of the proposed ponds to the Forker /Progress Road drainage facilities? This needs to be shown on the plan. 2. We are concerned that if water depths will be from 4 to 10 feet that the ponds will be a hazard unless fenced. 3. You propose "one or multiple culverts sized to prevent overtopping of the dikes" and "one double drywell in the bottom" of each cell. We do not agree that routine maintenance will not be needed. You need to prepare a maintenance plan for the ponds, drywells and culverts, determining how often maintenance is required to keep the facilities functioning at the capacities you have designed them. The access to the ponds for maintenance needs to be described and identified on the plan. 4. Before the County would accept ownership of the ponds, we would need a maintenance plan, clear access to the facilities, an agreement whereby all those benefitted by the ponds will pay for the pond maintenance and insurance and legal review by our attorneys of the potential liabilities to the County and the BPA restrictions placed on the area. You need to determine what area will be included in the maintenance agreement with the County. For these types of agreements, we generally notify each property owner affected. The Board of County Commissioners holds a public hearing before signing the agreement. Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 FAX (509) 456 -4715 letter to richard mason summer/ield east 12/9/93 page 2 5. We cannot agree that "No special provisions would be required for lots located in the Zone 'B' flood hazard area." In Spokane County B zones are treated the same as A zones during the building permit process. This means floodplain development permits will be required for hones in the B zone as well as in the A zone. If FEMA approves a Letter of Map Revision and removes the B zone from the neap and designates the area as a C zone, then no special provisions would be required for the area. 6. We agree that the approved facility must be completed prior to the finalization of all remaining lots in Summerfield East. We will also require that the applicant supply all documentation to FEMA for a Letter of Map Revision, i. e. all information necessary to have Summerfield East removed from the flood zone within one year of completion of the facility. We expect that FEMA will require the applicant to address the issue of debris removal. If that issue or others determined by FEMA requires the construction of facilities in addition to those already constructed by the applicant, then the applicant must construct whatever facilities are necessary to get the flood zone designation removed from the area by FEMA. 7. How will the matter of water quality be addressed? Under the 1987 amendments to the Federal Clean Water Act, we do not expect to be allowed to use drywells, sumps or other facilities that do not provide some pretreatment of stormwater before it is discharged to the ground or surface waters. If you are proposing vegetation for the ponds, please state that clearly. These issues need to be addressed as we move toward providing an environment in Summerfield East that is reasonably safe from flooding. If you have questions about any of these, please call Bill Hemmings or Brenda Sims. Sincerely, on Hofmann, P.E. County Engineer deainhumeasi INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. South 25 Altamont Street November 2, 1993 Spokane County Engineers 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, Washington 99260 Attention: Ron Horman, County Engineer Re: 100 Year Flood Control for Summerfield East Dear Ron: Spokane, Washington 99202 (509) 535 -1410 For the past eighteen months I have been working with Mr. Ken Tupper to develop a plan that will control flood waters expected to flow . down the Forker draw and allow the continuation of development of the preliminary plat of Summerfield East To date we have: 1. Solicited and received flood study maps from FEMA which detail the extent and depth of the 100 year flood expected on the Summerfield property. 2. Met with FEMA and Corps of Engineers representatives in Seattle to assist our understanding of alternate solutions to the problem. 3. Elected to develop a flood control solution which will divert flood waters from the area of Summerfield East proposed for residential lots to the area within the BPA powerline easement. 4. Dug soil test holes and conducted low -ring percolation tests. 5. Had several meetings, most recently with Bill Hemmings and Jim Radke with the County Engineer's Office, and with Mark Story with Howard Consultants to develop ideas concerning the size, location, configuration and allowable percolation rates for the facilities to be proposed. 6. Coordinated with BPA to develop a retention solution within the power line easement which is acceptable to BPA. Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Environmental Analysis At this point we have developed a preliminary retention pond configuration which is acceptable to BPA. A blueprint depicting this pond configuration is attached for your consideration. The criteria we intend to utilize to develop a detailed working design of the retention ponds is as follows: 1. The inflow hydrograph for the 100 year flood will be one developed by FEMA having a peak flow of 588.88 cts (printout attached for your review). We do not plan any additional flood studies of the Forker draw. 2. Surface water flow from the 100 year storm will be allowed to enter the retention facilities by overtopping Progress Road. We plan no revisions to either Progress Road or Forker Road which would allow the 100 year storm flow to pass under the travel way. 3. Retention ponds will be formed utilizing earth dikes constructed from native material. Maximum interior dike slopes will be 5:1. No fencing is planned. 4. Retention water depths will range from 4 to 10 feet. The entire .100 year storm volume will be stored or allowed to percolate. 5. Percolation rates used for design will be 6.70 in /hr and is based on the average direct readings of tests 1, 2 and 3 performed by Howard Consultants. (Tests attached for your information.) 6. Each cell of the retention facility will be connected to the adjacent downstream cell with one or multiple culverts sized to prevent overtopping of the dikes. 7. Each cell of the retention facility will have one double drywell in the bottom to keep the facility drained. Each cell will drain within 72 hours. 8. After construction of the dikes the surface will be planted with dryland grass. Routine maintenance is not planned. 9. Cell #4 will be excavated to a depth which will expose the naturally occurring sand and gravel. This depth is expected to be approximately 6 feet below natural ground. The total depth of cell #4 could be 10 feet. The depth of all other cells will be determined by balancing cut and fill quantities but will not be less than 4 feet. The freeboard allowed on each cell will be 6 inches. 10. Ownership of the ponds will be turned over to the County. Activities the County may wish to perform within the retention facilities will be subordinate to provisions of the BPA powerline easement. Please review and comment on the criteria outlined above. We need to have your written concurrence of the design criteria before we begin our design effort. When the approved facility is completed we expect to be able to finalize all remaining lots in Summerfield East with consideration given only to a 10 year storm for local drainage facilities. No special provisions would be required for lots located in the Zone "B" flood hazard area. We would be required to certify that finished floor elevations are at least one foot above the flood elevations established for Zone "A ". Zone "A" flood elevations will be based on FEMA's work map attached for your information. Finally we would ask for the County's cooperation in submitting a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) to FEMA to eliminate the Zone "A" designation in the residential area after all flood control facilities are complete. Very truly yours, Richard L. Mason, P.E. cc: Bill Hemmings Brenda Sims Enclosures: Preliminary Pond Layout 100 year Flood Hydrograph FEMA Work Map FEMA Final Map with Summerfield East overlaid Low ring Percolation Tests cal.11 eland ax Transmittal Memo 7672 To Company Weapon Fax Comments / • / re' / / ■/. 4 Yr r • 1 /4-V>v 7/ • C1 e e. u zo" L'A 7. on/Lr t \\ — • `lr' . , rohno o k Onmcm Oh.poeinon / I • C t. iy (4.4.1 A__O •#"'t d.r ' ire al Piga& From Company Location FRC To(k)y3 Dole /0 Time Dept. Charge Telephone 0 Derrrny r Flamm Call for ince up 4 4 l c P %C. / f z 1 ,16 - .? — 7,2 C ;ity (,6 4^/h,_ — ) .? • < •0 2zti -0/#0 't• m 5 77 • POND -2 Version: 5.15 S /N: 1295160123 >»» HYDROGRAPH PRINTOUT ««< 03 -20 -1991 17:05:51 Hydroaraph file: C: \PONDPACK \FORKER .HYD Time Hours HYDROGRAPH ORDINATES (cfs) Time increment = 0.100 Hours Time on left represents time for first Q in each row. 8.000 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.10 8.700 0.15 0.21 0.28 0.37 0.46 0.57 0.69 9.400 0.82 0.95 1.10 1.26 1.43 1.61 1.81 10.100 2.01 2.22 2.45 2.69 2.95 3.24 3.56 10.800 3.92 4.35 4.87 5.55 6.44 7.60 9.08 11.500 10.93 13.43 17.02 23.56 40.95 84.32 161.57 12.200 268.50 388.74 488.26 557.83 588.88 581.55 546.60 12.900 496.28 443.12 393.10 349.06 310.63 276.65 247.45 13.600 223.30 203.24 186.21 171.51 158.82 147.56 137.54 14.300 128.78 121.02 114.15 108.00 102.36 97.21 92.40 15.000 88.09 84.25 80.92 78.10 75.66 73.51 71.50 15.700 69.57 67.76 66.07 64.54 63.23 62.13 61.24 16.400 60.53 59.97 59.48 58.93 58.27 57.41 56.43 17.100 55.37 54.30 53.30 52.42 51.70 51.13 50.71 17.800 50.37 50.01 49.54 48.85 47.95 46.92 45.84 18.500 44.77 43.80 42.98 42.31 41.80 41.42 41.13 19.200 40.91 40.76 40.65 40.58 40.54 40.51 40.48 L9.900 40.34 40.02 39.43 38.57 37.58 36.51 35.46 20.600 34.49 33.66 32.99 32.47 32.07 31.76 31.53 21.300 31.37 31.24 31.16 31.09 31.05 31.02 31.00 22.000 30.99 30.98 30.98 30.99 31.00 31.01 31.02 22.700 31.04 31.05 31.07 31.09 31.11 31.13 31.16 23.400 31.08 31.20 31.22 31.25 31.25 31.12 30.81 24.100 30.06 28.69 26.72 24.00 20.91 17.68 14.56 2.4.800 11.70 9.24 7.23 5.63 4.39 3.43 2.69 25.500 2.13 1.70 1.37 1.12 0.92 0.75 0.62 26.200 0.51 0.43 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.21 0.18 26.900 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.05 27.600 ; 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 28.300 1 0.01 0.01 0.00 November 22, 1993 Richard Mason Inland Pacific Engineering Co., Inc. South 25 Altamont Street Spokane, WA 99202 Dear Richard: RE: Summerfield East /Flood Control Facilities Your letter of November 2, 1993 outlined your proposed approach to the design of flood control facilities for Summerfield East. We have reviewed your approach and have several questions, concerns and comments. 1. What is the connection of the proposed ponds to the Forker /Progress Road drainage facilities? This needs to be shown on the plan. 2. We are concerned that if water depths will be from 4 to 10 feet that the ponds will be a hazard unless fenced. 3. You propose "one or multiple culverts sized to prevent overtopping of the dikes" and "one double drywell in the bottom" of each cell. We do not agree that routine maintenance will not be needed. You need to prepare a maintenance plan for the ponds, drywells and culverts, determining how often maintenance is required to keep the facilities functioning at the capacities you have designed them. The access to the ponds for maintenance needs to be described and identified on the plan. 4. Before the County would accept the ownership of the ponds, we will need a maintenance plan, clear access to the facilities, an agreement whereby all those benefitted by the ponds will pay for the pond maintenance and insurance and legal review by our attorneys of the potential liabilities to the County and the BPA restrictions placed on the area. You need to determine what area will be included in the maintenance agreement with the County. For these types of agreements, we generally notify each property owner affected. The Board of County Commissioners holds a public hearing before signing the agreement. letter to richard mason summerfield east 11/22/92 page 2 5. We cannot agree that "No special provisions would be required for lots located in the Zone 'B' flood hazard area. In Spokane County B zones are treated the same as A zones during the building permit process. This means floodplain development permits will be required for homes in the B zone as well as in the A zone. 6. We agree that the approved facility must be completed prior to the finalization of all remaining lots in Summerfield East. We will also require that the applicant supply all documentation to FEMA necessary to have the lots in Summerfield East removed from the flood zone within one year of completion of the facility. We expect that FEMA will require the applicant to address the issue of debris removal. If the that issue or others determined by FEMA requires the construction of facilities in addition to those already constructed by the applicant, then the applicant must construct whatever facilities are necessary to get the flood zone designation removed from the area by FEMA. 7. How will the matter of water quality be addressed? Under the 1987 amendments to the Federal Clean Water Act, we do not expect to be allowed to use drywells, sumps or other facilities that do not provide some pretreatment of stormwater before it is discharged to the ground or surface waters. These issues need to be addressed as we move toward providing an environment in Summerfield East that is reasonably safe from flooding. If you have questions about any of these, please call Bill Hemmings or Brenda Sims. Sincerely, Ron Hormann, P.E. County Engineer drain /sumeast Bill and Tammie, Please review and revise as necessary. I've just listed my concerns. Anything else we should say? Bren Y wry � �� a INLANDPACIFIC ENGINEERING ( EERING CO., INC. O f AP , South 25 Altamont Street S n 1/2 November 2, 1993 Spokane County Engineers 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, Washington 99260 Attention: Ron Norman, County Engineer Re: 100 Year Flood Control for Summerfield East Dear Ron: RECEIVED NOV 0 2 1993 VOW:. E &An.n' ENGINEER For the past eighteen months I have been working with Mr. Ken Tupper to develop a plan that will control flood waters expected to flow down the Forker draw and allow the continuation of development of the preliminary plat of Summerfield East. To date we have: 1. Solicited and received flood study maps from FEMA which detail the extent and depth of the 100 year flood expected on the Summerfield property. 2. Met with FEMA and Corps of Engineers representatives in Seattle to assist our understanding of alternate solutions to the problem. 3. Elected to develop a flood control solution which will divert flood waters from the area of Summerfield East proposed for residential lots to the area within the BPA powerline easement. 4. Dug soil test holes and conducted low -ring percolation tests. 5. Had several meetings, most recently with Bill Hemmings and Jim Radke with the County Engineer's Office, and with Mark Story with Howard Consultants to develop ideas concerning the size, location, configuration and allowable percolation rates for the facilities to be proposed. 6. Coordinated with BPA to develop a retention solution within the power line easement which is acceptable to BPA. Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Environmental Analysis At this point we have developed a preliminary retention pond configuration which is acceptable to BPA. A blueprint depicting this pond configuration is attached for your consideration. The criteria we intend to utilize to develop a detailed working design of the retention ponds is as follows: 1. The inflow hydrograph for the 100 year flood will be one developed by FEMA having a peak flow of 588.88 cts (printout attached for your review). We do not plan any additional flood studies of the Forker draw. 2. Surface water flow from the 100 year storm will be allowed to enter the retention facilities by overtopping Progress Road. We plan no revisions to either Progress Road or Forker Road which would allow the 100 year storm flow to pass under the travel way. 3. Retention ponds will be formed utilizing earth dikes constructed from native material. Maximum interior dike slopes will be 5:1. No fencing is planned. 4. Retention water depths will range from 4 to 10 feet. The entire .100 year storm volume will be stored or allowed to percolate. 5. Percolation rates used for design will be 6.70 in /hr and is based on the average direct readings of tests 1, 2 and 3 performed by Howard Consultants. (Tests attached for your information.) 6. Each cell of the retention facility will be connected to the adjacent downstream cell with one or multiple culverts sized to prevent overtopping of the dikes. 7. Each cell of the retention facility will have one double drywell in the bottom to keep the facility drained. Each cell will drain within 72 hours. 8. After construction of the dikes the surface will be planted with dryland grass. Routine maintenance is not planned. 9. Cell #4 will be excavated to a depth which will expose the naturally occurring sand and gravel. This depth is expected to be approximately 6 feet below natural ground. The total depth of cell #4 could be 10 feet. The depth of all other cells will be determined by balancing cut and fill quantities but will not be less than 4 feet. The freeboard allowed on each cell will be 6 inches. 10. Ownership of the ponds will be turned over to the County. Activities the County may wish to perform within the retention facilities will be subordinate to provisions of the BPA powerline easement. Please review and comment on the criteria outlined above. We need to have your written concurrence of the design criteria before we begin our design effort. When the approved facility is completed we expect to be able to finalize all remaining lots in Summerfield East with consideration given only to a 10 year storm for local drainage facilities. No special provisions would be required for lots located in the Zone "B" flood hazard area. We would be required to certify that finished floor elevations are at least one foot above the flood elevations established for Zone "A ". Zone "A" flood elevations will be based on FEMA's work map attached for your information. Finally we would ask for the County's cooperation in submitting a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) to FEMA to eliminate the Zone "A" designation in the residential area after all flood control facilities are complete. Very truly yours, Richard L. Mason, P.E. cc: Bill Hemmings Brenda Sims Enclosures: Preliminary Pond Layout 100 year Flood Hydrograph FEMA Work Map FEMA Final Map with Summerfield East overlaid Low ring Percolation Tests Fax Transmittal Memo 7672 To j) Company Localion Fax 0 Comments 1 / 4 c 20 hi (/ P er/ry a / 'ei Y , /Y 7.: yMI(/fAVi>/ /,Yrr ;• / l , f r H. IV(4., ✓� HY 1 �� ? , - /H () I �i(, 7 • Z , I �L V � (•31, ��r � . .. I C " is ; c' / / • Q 1 / //y I I•Cr , . /L.I 2 '//4 `v.74" 1r /Mr 1I 1- 7. 3't' , •A, u 1 /4' 6. 7 r 1 ' //C 5 5 •, fi .l% N. t /T/d _ /n! 1 / /n) 1 rt 146 /1 0) g 0 /n (to /' (7) f 7 —//• r No. or Papa / TooneWle / �/ Ime 4i: From /24' 1 •A- Company Location Fax it Orvieto Diapoaaon Z Z — a //q SvYrl w 't• fats g it h L 1 /I4 - I.? i.11.r 142 - ) .7rA.ft, / "% ,, r�u 3 c. k /Zs Al i! //T •MZ. ..a D Destroy • S 15- /1` - /S.75 L "46- /1.05. t4.16r. 2. M1 " /.o 'r l 9. 37 y.:0,v • /iree.040;w lisetvw t P rn(4: Dept.Charga Telephone N Return Call for pickup I Z.:L .�y.v POND -2 Version: 5.15 S /N: 1295160123 >»» HYDROGRAPH PRINTOUT ««< 03 -20 -1991 17:05:51 Hydrograph file: C: \PONDPACK \FORKER .HYD HYDROGRAPH ORDINATES (cfs) Time increment =0.100 Hours Time on left represents time for first Q in each row. Time Hours 8.000 0.00 0.01. 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.10 8.700 0.15 0.21 0.28 0.37 0.46 0.57 0.69 9.400 0.82 0.95 1.10 1.26 1.43 1.61 1.81 10.100 2.01 2.22 2.45 2.69 2.95 3.24 3.56 10.800 3.92 4.35 4.87 5.55 6.44 7.60 9.08 11.500 10.93 13.43 17.02 23.56 40.95 84.32 161.57 12.200 268.50 388.74 488.26 557.83 588.88 581.55 546.60 12.900 496.28 443.12 393.10 349.06 310.63 276.65 247.45 13.600 223.30 203.24 186.21 171.51 158.82 147.56 137.54 14.300 128.78 121.02 114.15 108.00 102.36 97.21 92.40 15.000 88.09 84.25 80.92 78.10 75.66 73.51 71.50 15.700 69.57 67.76 66.07 64.54 63.23 62.13 61.24 16.400 60.53 59.97 59.48 58.93 58.27 57.41 56.43 17.100 55.37 54.30 53.30 52.42 51.70 51.13 50.71 17.800 50.37 50:01 49.54 48.85 47.95 46.92 45.84 18.500 44.77 43.80 42.98 42.31 41.80 41.42 41.13 19.200 40.91 40.76 40.65 40.58 40.54 40.51 40.48 19.900 40.34 40.02 39.43 38.57 37.58 36.51 35.46 20.600 34.49 .33.66 32.99 32.47 32.07 31.76 31.53 21.300 31.37 31.24 31.16 31.09 31.05 31.02 31.00 22.000 30.99 30.98 30.98 30.99 31.00 31.01 31.02 22.700 31.04 31.05 31.07 31.09 31.11 31.13 31.16 23.400 31.08 31.20 31.22 31.25 31.25 31.12 30.81 24.100 30.06 28.69 26.72 24.00 20.91 17.68 14.56 24.800 11.70 9.24 7.23 5.63 4.39 3.43 2.69 25.500 2.13 1.70 1.37 1.12 0.92 0.75 0.62 26.200 0.51 0.43 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.21 0.16 26.900 -' 0.15 0.13 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.05 27.600 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 28.300 ; 0.01 0.01 0.00 _.. OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER NORTH 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 509 - 456 -3600 ,urged Lis/ Date G -¢ - Inspector A..S 76 Weather Time Charged Contractor this Day -1/2 or 1 Other County Personnel 1 2 3 4 5 6 Contractor Personnel Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 Diary Section Comments: <is 1.41t014n F /ctik, /am r+ t. /✓.s A3 ,0�� 2 1 A' /� Bn SfQm S E4ein fan. , .-s - -A. /,N/2 s.'ac, 7 - 7 �� _ 7 n' .i, , n _ ". ,rte i . /le on.hr/.B4i c,/ A // 9.9 ' rAos fl, 4# .4 5 ep ✓.r i - , '. 6 • _ : .... / '., .E. 4 e... ' ems',' _ n f / — /,Ones. INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE 4, 0 t 1 k20l0 Project Name Sce4em e /,.; <dS ' Project No. CRP /RID / Report No. Contractor and /or Sub s) t4 Equipment List Hrs. Used Standby Number on. Ply N� 0 Station and Ref. to C/L — Ref. to Sub Grade Type of Material and Use MOISTURE PERCENT PERCENT 1!W DENSITY PCF Opt. Opt. Correctec Fielc Test PASSING / #4 SIEVE Max. Corr. Std. No. Field Test % Max. REMARKS 1 el- 50 S— 0.6. kn. s 3 3,4 /3/ 95; a Lao .;ilk; a 7 4 - 30 rt-1- n 4.Z ,r 2.6 zae,A1 442% 3 8-e a d n 3. 0 11 9sS Lurk4- .PeZ + 364- 70 / .L/ " ,, Z.3 if 9o.8 ieetpam, sit- s 9 -/- et n n 3 " 972 4,th /rte e/. Go to 1- 5 t /721 s " _ICS rr 2)Z.3 .•ue,'/!, ,Pi, 7 / 2 f- sr) !3 iei a " 5.0 /r 94.9 ` /lam 4! g 37 60 3 2,4 a rl 0.9 /610,p aea 4, g 4-oo 2/2.1, r 0 3t ,-. 97zJP 993 ss /� /o /D 4 /pIA "1 ti 1 3 / 1 124 en 23 • i' 1, 3-8 r 97-9 .....5 gera DAILY COMPACTION TEST REPORT Project Engineer Contractor L v/9nd Nip Aeci/t JCdr»�lr✓Ce /r /d sa Project Name REMARKS: Tp5 A „fl . +the d l 'N.i79i57mie 0 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS; Cont. No. "WA— 042 Date 4= 29 -87 Page No. / of / W W .: W W == o u • z< rW� u 5. 1 6 ,, a 888 -448 5-83 COUNTY DATUM TBM- R.R.: SPIKE iN P. W CORNER EVERGREEN 4 14ELLESLEY ELEV.. 20 23.? CONST. CURB h 2 DROP STA. t sij / CON ST. CURB DROP S1A. 2 +42 CURB RETURN A:89°38'01" R. 20.00 L= 31.29 T= 19.87 C. 28.19 ECR 2 8 ' ( Mc / 1 NOTE SI.4EE.T .7 OF 7 !0 INSTALL SIGN SEE 29.3 2.4.74 644 80.00 Top •G RAT E ELEV =: 2028 STA. 2: +3 2 70.00 5CR 3o -80 MGR 31 .24' ECR 31.71 CURB RETURN 0= 90 °00'00" R= 20.00 L= 31.42 T= 20.00 C. Z8.28 L a qd C17 Ce 0 3 - +.00800! +. .00900 CONST. CURB DROP STA 3485 4 � 50 Co NST CURB DROP STA. 4 +4% 70.00 SCR 3 •4a MCd . 3t.5b EGR RET L]Rt4 Aa 90°00 R. 20.00 L= 31.42 T. ` 20.00 C. 28:28 TOP :GRA'C'E'. ELEV.= :20 *O.:4 STA. _ . :t : LUCI C : LLE GoNtST URB ROAD 4T (0 " CONST U . CRB• DROP STA. '7 too IE 1N Z°I.GMp 3 3 \\ DROP STA..8 +o0 ' a, 1, 1E OUT -27.92 a (-ANSI*. DRAT O I i i CONST. CURB C-URS STA. 5 +t5 N ` � ' i E DROP STA. 7458 DR.OP';STA. B•OO COT3ST. 80.00 CO NST. TYPE B" DRYWELL W /ME FRAM U E E RA E TYPE 3 INSTALL SIGN SEE WOrE SHEET : 7 O'F 7 80.00 80.00 10.0` VC, ...... 100 VC 80.00 10' DRAINAGE SWALE CONST, `! PE "B DRYWEL W/ METAL FRAME \ GRATE TYPE t 0.00 CONST, Y "B" FRAME R E TYPE 80.00 '1001 VG• OC:''V.0 "100` VC. TOP ... .GRi?Te. E.LgV= 2031;33 STA=:: ?t85 - 80.00 80.00 CU RETURN A= 90°21' S9" R= 20.00 L= 31.54 T. 20.13 C= . 28.37 EC K 33.2=; MCR 33.47 BCR 65.18 CO MST CURE DROP STA.9 +44 ao + 0.08 CAA Re. RETURN 6 =89 °58'01" R= 20.00 L° 31.29 T= 19.87 C= 213.19 INSTALL SIGN SEE NOTE SHEET 6 OF 7 S CURVE DATA ©= 24° 19' 39" R= 4!03.94 L= 196.99 T= 100.00 C. 195.51 ECR. 360 • CURS RETURN A- 89 °37'05" R =20 L= 28.12 7= 16.94 C= 25.86 EC 35.6,5 MC.R 35. - BCR- 3S•6, 3 CU RB RETURN Lim 89 °37'05" R= 201 00 L= 3 ° 1. 28 T. 19.87 C= 28.19 P1UTl THE PERMIT ENGINEER 45 6 -38Qo W •• N . t.. V OLu NX > SHEET. NO ZOF