Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PE-1390-80
r2_Ar N.444e ti- K 2.`( UO IZT tin r J 7 v dVW AL in 1ER o f Lor s �-7 71 o l LT) l l" 1 co Lo T S C7 P1.A T CHECK re � 5 �f 2. 'O 0 v K< A /m 4 rii X 0 SSE CC. O IL J ec.e - AJo 12.i ii OF LIE -S nati_ 0 Y� f LAT Lec.ATioAter 777- 149-A-, 777-i-- 0 C lia 5,a &4ri, LXaet o � `` a „1,URVEY44f_S.�T!/'.t/4Is &AP _ / am t a Gc/, nr,Ys O K ,, 11 �^(� I� Lk eSZ �o r Pjp czt Q n 9 ° ^ 0 r / ton C. Eno En �s 0 K 0 K tor e t it/e ire es " Pe0lor ie�frj6�.W�U 1 Fool Sr,{ /e N/ A 0 K /42A K- 3 /PP4 n..• cCzo l„ent is rrac X L o r_�ee-.a s v R * tr. n' Weer e< /4 / P. OK— Ct -S nF � 1C.1P��� 0 lL �/ A ii( A 1 FQ.cxr Tr22 o c .geto/fo at gip -CRP SrArvseur vDtaaa �L.E� c Pen (Eta trf LL. isj A. R/4.1 12 - Di�TLON Diem n/ /41S a LAA2chsUAaa F 1PzSUR9,,p2ce ,.LS1s1sT e ns__ n12oc.._ it s &lvAtr+✓ waeert E; _Coal? ac t ts e- c_k, 0� S7 O u.n c R s of i ps 0� off / t Soap PL n 1) ETC D / C a D 0--. et- -.0 - �� o R Mr," or Mites (4Ei) c 4d & A 2 .4-5 4,_ a c c,c 4 owi-EQge S 5 FN61Nee& /' - - VS • DECLARATION OF COVENANT REQUIRING PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE dF APPROVED PRIVATE ROAD, AND DEDICATION TO THE COUNTY WHEN REQUIRED DECLARATION OF COVENANT: In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of "LUXURY COURT" (hereinafter referred to as the "Development "), the undersigned covenants and agrees that: (1) A lot is served by -a private road when: (a) the only road frontage for the lot in the Development is on the private road; or (b) a lot having frontage on more than one road (public or private) constructs an approach to the private road. (2) The owner(s) of any lot created by the Development or alteration thereof and served by a private road shall be responsible for financing the construction and maintenance of said private road. (3) The road shall be improved consistent with Spokane County standards for private roads. (4) Maintenance methods, standards and financing shall be in a manner determined by the owners of: (a) the majority of lots served by such private road; (5) In the event such private road is improved to .Spokane County standards for public streets and the County is willing to accept the dedication of such road, each lot owner shall execute any documents necessary to accomplish such dedication. (6) Owners of lots within the Development who are served by such road, may sue and recover damages and attorneys' fees from any owner_ of any lot within the Develop- ment which is similarly served who refuses to participate in the road construction, financing, and maintenance. (7) 'WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, or main- tain or otherwise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this Development. By accepting this Development or subse- quently by allowing.a building permit to be issued for property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine,, survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. (8) This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road as p ovided herein. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) PLAT6 DATED this // - of 4- L4L -GQp L , • c$0Nko2tl County of Spokane ) On this day personally appeared before me Alin/ C1((1-17-/Fig .l� YEe wi' 6 41 Cuv,v✓17rown to me to be he individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he4she - /they signed the same as ltisatt /their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL f /'-> day of ,, 19 n� N ary Publi of Washingto , residing at Spokane n_snd for the State If SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE Jones & Mitchell Ins. Co. E 123 - 2nd Avenue P.O. Box 2786 Spokane, WA. 99220 -2786 RE: Luxury Court PE 1390 Dear Sir or Madam: cc: Cedar Builders, Inc. alPAI l J OYl.IB O, i , I „mo PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 August 20, 1990 Please be advised that Bond Number 30132781 issued by Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland in the current amount of $9,000.00 for roadway improvements in the above mentioned subdivision may now be released. If you have any questions, feel free to call our office. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Jerry Si s 4( Plat Inspector Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 TO: Tom Yake FROM: Jerry Sims SUBJECT:. Lurury Court PE1390 (E10107 8th Ave.) orr I CE OE THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 9c DATE: February 71990 We have received a request from the sponsor to reduce /release the bond for the above mentioned project. Please review this at your earliest possible convenience and notify me of the amount, if any, we need to retain in order to assure the completion of the project. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. 0,p 2Q1 t99° / � 1/25/90 Insurance & Risk Management • Since 1910 EAST l23 SECOND *P. BOX 2788* SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 90220'2780*(5OO)838'350/ FAX (509) 838-3511 Spokane County Planning Dept. 721 North Jefferson Spukane, NA 99260 Attention: Re/ Cedar Builders. Inc. Luxury Court Apartment Complex East 10107 8th Ave., Spokane, HA We current} hav They are' the fencing uxury our and ' v ~ .��andscapioy,�� #30132781, Roadway Improvement Bond. All three bonds have been in effect for two years. Are o / Cordialy ^�-- �noey nd Assistant' ��� ��r°0 JONES & MITCHELL ce for t ^^� `��oi}ders thetabnve project #30132935, Performance bond' for • �� a� � � � � � �� � � E �O0� �l000 ~." v */v�w SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING OEPART�E�T ���� able to .release /` ' �/ � ^��/.^/ / • -� .amwa ~'^ C A T� \� 7l ���� \� v - � �� �� .� � ���� / u ' ~~^fr�&�J~� `//`'�x�/ x��� ' `/�v' \ b • 2/21/90 JONES & MITCHELL- Insurance & Risk Management • Since 1910 EAST 123 SECOND • P.O. BOX 2786 • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99220 -2786 • (509) 838 -3501 FAX (509) 838 -3511 Bob McCann Spokane County Engineer's Office N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 Re: Cedar Builders, Inc. Bond No. 30132781 Dear Mr. McCann, The captioned Roadway Improvement Bond was issued in 1988 for the improvements required at the Luxury Court Apartment Complex, 10107 8th Avenue, (Esther's', Addition PE- 1328 -79 & ZE 191 -79). We would appreciate it if you would review and let us know if this bond can now be released. k you, anice Shuey Bond Assistant � ,sue =nr. : 4:n i `' 1 . ?4.r FEB FEB 2 31990 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND of the State of Maryland SUBDIVISION ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT BOND .dond No. 30132781 CEDAR BUILDERS, INC. of Spokane, Washington, as PRINCIPAL and FIDELITY & a corporation organized and existing under the laws and authorized to transact a surety business in the State of Washington, as SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto the Board of County Commis- sioners of Spokane County, Washington, as OBLIGEE, in the penal sum of NINE THOUSAND AND NO /100 ($ 9,000.00 ) DOLLARS lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, the PRINCIPAL and SURETY bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED this 21 day of January , 19 88 • WHEREAS, the said PRINCIPAL is the owner of a tract of land in Spokane County divided and platted into lots and known as LUXURY COURT and being located in Section 12_, Township 75 North, Range 44 E.W.M., in Spokane County, Washington and said County has required that a bond be furnished in an amount sufficient to pay the construction costs of grading and surfacing to the approved grades and typical section the roadways of said plat and the intallation of drainage structures and such other work as is incidental and necessary thereto all in accordance with those Plat Roadway Improvement Specifications dated 19 , and to the satisfaction of the County Engineer; such improvements to be completed not later than January 21 19 90 unless said date be extended at the option of the County Engineer. Upon failure of the PRINCIPAL to comply with the requirements stated herein within the time authorized, the OBLIGEE shall look to the SURETY for satisfaction to the extent of this BOND. The obligation of this BOND shall be kept in full force and effect until, in the opinion of the OBLIGEE, the requirements herein stated have been satisfied in which event written release will be given by the OBLIGEE, the OBLIGEE having sole right to grant such release and the SURETY hereby waives all rights to release from the obligation except as herein stated. APPROVED AS TO FORM CEDAR B_LDERS, INC. Principal Fidelit ;. Deposit Company of Maryland Deputy Prosecuting Attorney (Attorney - in - Fact), James A. Brown - Power of Attorney FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND HOME OFFICE, BALTIMORE. MD KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a corporation of the State of Maryland, by C. M. PECOT, JR. Vice - President, and C. W. ROBBINS Assistant Secretary, in pursuance of authority granted by Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of said Company, which are set forth on the reverse side hereof and are hereby certified to be in full force and effect on the date hereof, does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint P. P. Lynch, Jr. , Robert J. Dwlgh.t B. Aden, James A. Brown and Janice I. Shuey, all of Spokane, Washington, EACH ? its true and lawful agent and Attorney -in- Fact, to make, executei�(eel hd deliver . on its behalf as surety, and m its act and deed: any and all bonds and undertakings \Zip execution of such bonds or undertakings in ppcn»a` e�nce of the eipre ate, shall be as binding upon said Company, as fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as if they luidieen duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its office in Baltimore, Md., in thekr proper.. ?sonJThis power of attorney revokes that issued on behalf of P. P. LynclziONr., etaE dated, December 30, 1986. The said Assistant Secretary does hereby tsfi' that theextraot set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of said Company and is nowan`'force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Vine`- resident andd ' A ietant Secretary have hereunto subscribed their names and affixed the Corporate Seal of the said FIDELITYYAN DEPOS y OMPANY OF MARYLAND this 29th day of September , A D 198 FIDELITY ANIkAEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND ATTEST: STATE OF MARYLAND CITY OF BALTIMORE 180 -4119 55 By 04,44.fre. Vice - President Assistant ;'Secretary Assistant Secretary On this 29th day of September , A.D. 19 87, before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, in and for the City of Baltimore, duly commissioned and qualified, came the above -named Vice- President and Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, to me personally known to be the individuals and officers described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and they each acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly sworn, severally and each for himself deposed) and saith, that they are the said officers of the Company aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company, and that the said Corporate Seal and their signatures as such officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal, at the City of Baltimore, e day and year first above written. / / 'i !wR•".,S' Notary Public Comm' -•_ion � pres Jul y 1. 1990 CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, do hereby certify that the original Power of Attorney of which the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy, is in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certify that the Vice- President who executed the said Power of Attorney was one of the additional Vice- Presidents specially authorized by the Board of Directors to appoint any Attorney -in -Fact as provided in Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND. This Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held on the 16th day of July, 1969. RESOLVED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any Assistant Secretary of the Company, whether made heretofore or hereafter, wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company, shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed." IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have here subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the said Company, this 21 day of Januar , 19 EXTRACT FROM BY -LAWS OF FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND "Article VI, Section 2. The Chairman of the Board, or the President, or any Executive Vice - President, or any of the Senior Vice - Presidents or Vice - Presidents specially authorized so to do by the Board of Directors or by the Executive Committee, shall have power, by and with the concurrence of the Secretary or any one of the Assistant Secretaries, to appoint Resident Vice - Presidents, Assistant Vice - Presidents and Attorneys -in -Fact as the business of the Company may require, or to authorize any person or persons to execute on behalf of the Company any bonds, undertakings, recognizances, stipulations, policies, contracts, agreements, deeds, and releases and assignments of judgements, decrees, mortgages and instruments in the nature of mortgages, ... and to affix the seal of the Company thereto." 1.1.1281, 1) 2) 3) 4) LUXURY COURT DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS 1) Drywell - Type A EA. 2) Drywell - Type B EA. 3) Grate ~ Type 1 EA. 4) Grate - Type 2 EA. 5> Grate ~ Type 3 EA. 6) Backfill For DW CY 7) Concrete Inlet EA. 8) C.M. pipe 10" dia.. LF 9) C.M. pipe 12" dia. LF 10) C.M. pipe 15" dia. LF 11) C.M. pipe 18" dia. LF 12) Precast Manhole EA. 13) Solid Lid EA. 14) Ditch Excavation CY 15) Sod SF GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, & SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade CY 21) Top Course CY 20} Base Course CY 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 23) Curb Type A LF 24) Curb Type B LF 25) Curb Type R LF 26) Sidewalk SO YD NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS ` 0111‘ , E EES NIP11711-1E-E: ~- -------------------'--~--------------------- • NAME JS DATE 12/0:3/87 QUANTITY NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) SPECIAL CONC INLET EA 1 250"00 250,00 2) 0.00 3> 0"00 4} 0.00 5) 0.00 6) 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 250"00 16) Monuments EA. 140.00 0^00 17) Barricade LF 20.00 0.00 18) Street Signs EA' 75.00 0.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL 0"00 82 41 84.1 327.1 199.9 GRADING AND SURFACING SUB TOTAL GRAND TOTAL PRICE COST 1175.00 0"00 1435^00 0.00 300.00 0.00 320.00 0"00 310.00 0"00 7.00 0.00 520.00 0.00' 12.00 0^00 16.50 0.00 18.00 0.00 21.00 0.00 1435.00 0^00 300.00 0.00 7.90 0.00 0^50 0"O0 7` 90 10.60 10.60 37"6O 4.25 5.70 5.20 13.00 647.80 434.60 0.00 3162.16 0"00 1700.92 0.00 25?9.7O 0.00 0.00 0.00 0"00 ------- 8544.18 � � Lot. 8774"18 PROJECT NO.- PE1390 DESIGNER- JS PROJECT DESCRIPTION- LUXURY COURT STREET # 1 NAME- PTH AVE LENGTH- 327 FT. WIDTH- 9FT" BEGINNING STATION = 3670.23 ENDING STATION = 3997.34 ONE SIDE ONLY PWIDTH= 22.00 EWIDTH= 12"70 QWTDTH= 0^00 TERM # 1 : TAPER TAPER LENGTH = 30.00 TERM # 2 : TAPER TAPER LENGTH = 30.00 ITEM SURFACE AREA- ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING TOTALS . STREET QUANTITIES DATE- 12/03/87 MEASUREMENT QUANTITY 3321"12 S.F. ^ 67 FT" 82.0 C.V. . 33 FT. 41.0 C.Y. 0.00 FT. O~O C.Y. . 33 FT. 84.1 TONS 0^00 FT. PROPOSED 327.1 FT. 0.00 SY. PROPOSED 199.9 SY. ROADWAY EXCAVATION 82.0 C.Y. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE 41.0 C.Y. CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 0.0 C.Y. ASPHALT CONCRETE 94.1 TONS CURB 327"1 FT" SIDEWALK 199.9 SY. FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST . TO ========================================================================== AUTO INV PLAT BOUNDARY PE1390 12/3/87 ***** START 1000.00000 1000.00000 1 1 INV N 0 02 08.0 W 330.0000 1329.99994 999.79521 ..- ., 2 INV S 90 00 00.0 E 327.0800 1329.99994 1326.87521 3 5 INV 8002 08.0 E 330.0000 1000.00000 1327.08000 4 4 INV N 90 CC) 00.0 W 327.0800 1000.00000 1000.00000 5 ========================================================================= 1000.00000 . 1000.00000 I NO CLOSURE ERROR Area=107956.38 ft 2.4779acres TO: S I (N1 P frN FROM: 512/6 O F F I C E O F C O U N T Y E N G I N E E R Spokane County, Washington Date: , , 19 p J Do SUBJECT: Standard Drainage Language for the Dedication on L L/X G/ /r ! n e - y, s The owners of Lots 1, a , 1 ^ S C, of Block I -- shall be held responsible for keeping open and a. maintaining the path of the natural or manmade drainage flow over and across the property. The property owner or his representative shall inform each suceeding purchaser of all drainage easements on the property and his responsibility for maintaining drainage facilities within said easements. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas not the responsibility for any drainage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. The lowest floor, including basement floor, for any structure shall be constructed according to the requirements of the Spokane County Flood Zone Ordinance in effect at the time a building permit is issued. 5. An approved lot grading plan exists for Lots _ , _, & _ Block _ and Lots _ _ _, & _ Block _ Grading must conform to said plan on file in the County Engineer's Office. 6. Spokane County shall. not be responsible to maintain ingress or egress across the flood plain area. 7. The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to join in any County approved Storm- water Management Program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fixed through public hearings for service or benefit obtained by the planning, design, con- structing, maintaining, or operation of stormwacer control facilities. Drainage easements, as platted and shown hereon, which are for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted. The County of Spokane is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all drainage easements adjacent to the public right - of -way. The property owner shall maintain the drainage swale with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage swaie as indicated by the approved plans. 9. A statement must appear in the dedicatory language of the plat that individual driveway access permits be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. This approach shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plan on file in the County Engineer's Office. Jr 81(908 REDIFCRM • ' East 907 Rosewood DATE itiZqh 7 7 .4 - 111 :1 -AP 7 t7,T/ .5 4MES .. ;4-'•?)ii t n4 7 ‘.$ 3 th i t' .• • ' !:• l 1:1:•. tSrgkiiitt. - 1•••,- "1, •2••„•,‘ • CEDAR BLDRS. INC, Commercial. Builders N PAYMENT FOR 1 -1 2/ nit --kit.) Slashane. Washington 99208 15091489-4111 IC:i EIMDEP.f: dm; PAY U mug Nos 0 6,1, 0 0 L. Ts TO THE ORDER 0 / 4-6 zir filt-te- SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK North Spokane Branch - Spokane 0008 7 7 This 1:1,250000 241: 82L52 28 7 CHECK NO. ACCTS. PAYABLE DISCOUNT 1 .1 1 41L. , . 19-2/1250 8772 4r 2rtir it 3I: r. 1,;:j4Vrr DOLLARS CHECK AMOUNT '•;:,` ' 17.3.■ CO RE: 1. SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS & ORDER DATE: February 19, 1987 PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT - CHANGE OF CONDITION PUDE -1 -80, Redesign of PUD That the proposal is to revise the approved subdivision and PUD from a 24 -unit townhouse project to a 5 -lot subdivision containing 5 8 -plex buildings for a total of 40 units. 2. That the proposal is located adjacent to and south of 8th Avenue approximately one block west of Felts Road in Section 20, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. 3. That the item has been properly advertised in accordance with state and local regulations. 4. That the Committee has considered and evaluated the information and conditions contained in the Planning Report for this proposal. 5. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as URBAN and the proposal appears generally consistant with the density and use guidelines of this category. 6. That the Committee finds the proposal compatible with existing uses in the area if increased landscaping is included along the north, east and west property lines. 7. That one owner of adjacent and nearby property spoke generally against the density increase of the proposal and the related traffic, impacts. 8. That the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act have been complied with. 9. NOTE: Pursuant to WAC 197 -11- 680(5), Notice is hereby given that in conjunction with final approval of the above reference matter that: a. The time limit for commencing SEPA appeal of the approval of the above referenced matter, as provided by county ordinance, is 30 calendar days from final execution of the above Findings and Order b. The time frame for appealing any SEPA issues with respect to the approval of the above referenced matter is 30 days after the execution of the above Findings and Order. c. The appeal of either the approval of the above referenced matter or any SEPA issues may be filed in the Spokane County Superior Court or a court of competent jurisdiction as provided by law. d. That decisions of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee become "Final" unless appealed within 10 days of the Committee written decision. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS & ORDER FILE NO. PE- 1390 -80 e. Decisions rendered by the Board of County Commissioners are final when the Board signs its Findings and Order. CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the above findings concludes that the application for Change of Condition of preliminary plat PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT and PUDE -2 -80, Redesign of Planned Unit Development be APPROVED in accordance with the Conditions of Approval attached hereto. VOTE: Unanimously Approved ATTEST. �'� �avi . a DEG AS S. AD DATE Spokane County ivision Administrator THE HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTESTS TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION AND VOTE. C Chairperson PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT - CHANGE OF CONDITION IN REFERENCE TO THE ATTACHED FINDINGS & ORDER, THE HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE AD PT THE FOLLOWIN R TI: ....''1. P 'NN N 1. That the below listed conditions of all Departments and Agencies are binding upon the applicant, owner(s) of the property, heirs, successors or assigns. COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2. The Spokane County Subdivision Administrator shall review any proposed Final Plat to insure compliance with the Findings and Conditions of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. 3. That approval of the PUD Development Plan shall meet the requirements of this Final PUD approval. However, the actual PUD overlay zoning shall not be mapped on the County zoning maps until the Final Plat of Esther's Replat is recorded. The original intent of the development plan shall be maintained with the following changes as noted: (a) No phasing shall be allowed; (b) A 6 -foot sight- obscuring fence shall be provided along the east, west and north property lines. The fence along the east and west property lines shall be reduced to 3 feet high in the front yard area (30 ft. north from 8th Avenue). The fence shall be constructed of wood; (c) A lighting plan shall be submitted prior to final plat approval. The lighting plan shall not allow exterior direct lighting to extend beyond the property lines. (All lighting shall be shaded and used in a down - lighting fashion); (d) Refuge areas shown on the PUD shall be screened from view by a sight- obscuring fence, vegetation or topography (berming); (e) More landscaping will be required than,.shown on the final PUD map along the east and west property lines to provide suitable buffering to adjacent residential uses. Such increase in landscaping shall be approved by the Subdivision Administrator; (f) A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Subdivision Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. Protective covenants be reviewed and approved by the Subdivision Administrator prior to finalization of the plat. 4. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for three (3) years to March 1, 1990. The applicant may request an Extension of Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 5. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat, for distribution to the County Planning Department, Utilities Department, Engineering Department, Health District and applicable utility companies. Written approval of said utility easements by said utility companies must be received with the submittal of the final plat. ,6. That a current certificate of title be furnished the County Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 7. Final Plat dedication shall state: "No lot shall be further subdivided for purposes of creating additional lots without filing a replat." i' HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, February 19, 1987 PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT - Change of Condition Planning Department (Cont'd) 8. That a plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection be approved by the water supplier, fire protection district, Spokane County Building & Safety Department and County health authorities. The agencies will certify on the WATER PLAN, prior to the filing of the final plat of any phase of the preliminary plat that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The WATER PLAN. and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved WATER PLAN. The time schedule will provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat sponsor shall also sign the WATER PLAN to confirm the contractual arrangements or agreements. The final plat dedication will contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building & Safety Department, and water purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 9.. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition'bf this application, and prior to any on -site improvements unless the applicant(s) /sponsor(s) choose to file a notarized Waiver of Notice of Action with the Spokane County Planning Department. COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT 1. That plans, profiles, and cross- sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 2. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. An on -site drainage plan for the disposal of stormwater must be submitted to the County Engineer prior to release of building permits. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, February 19, 1987 PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT - Change of Condition Engineer Department (Cont'd) 3. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be K.. performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 4. No construction work is to within the existing or proposed public right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 5. All construction within the existing or proposed public Right -of -Way is to be completed prior to filing each final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 6. The applicant should be advised that individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system." 7. Existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and curbed to Spokane County standards. 8. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number One, Secondary Arterial standard for the improvements of 8th Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 4 to 6 ft. of asphalt, curb and sidewalk along the frontage of the development. 9. The proposed private road(s) as shown on the preliminary plat serving P.U.D. lots is approved by the County Engineer. 10. That private road(s) be improved to Spokane County standard for a private road Urban - Suburban standard serving P.U.D. lots. Subject to approval under Section 10.207 of the Spokane County Fire Code. 11. All vested owners shall sign and record private road documents as prescribed by the Spokane County Engineer. These documents shall be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to recording with the Spokane County Auditor. Recording numbers shall be referenced in the dedicatory languagea of the plat. 12. That the following statement be placed in the plat dedication: WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain, or otherwise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, February 19, 1987 PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT - Change of Condition Engineer Department (Cont'd) alter, repair, improve, maintain private road. This requirement be binding upon the owner, their the obligation to participate in provided herein ". [5. , provide drainage or snow removal on a is and shall run with the land and shall heirs, successors or assigns including the maintenance of the private road as The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees in new construction. That the following statement must appear in the dedicatory language of the plat: The private road as shown hereon is an easement which provides a means of ingress and egress for those lots within the plat having frontage thereon. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibited. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that,. suitable sites for on -site sewage disposal systems are available on lots 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5. The dedicatory language of the plat will state that: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems may be authorized." The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 46. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT y. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No.80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific applicaton approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, February 19, 1987 PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT - Change of Condition Health District (Cont'd) 2 The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94 ". r 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 4. A dry sewer connection to the future area -wide Sewerage System is to be constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer connection are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department prior to finalization of this action. COUNTY BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. Fire hydrants shall be located so as to be accessible to fire apparatus and not be obstructed by any structure or vegetation or have the visibility impaired for a distance of fifty feet in the direction of vehicular approach to the hydrant. 2. Specific location of hydrants shall be determined by the fire district. '3. Commercial dumpsters and containers with an individual capacity of 1.5 cubic yards or greater shall not be stored or placed within five feet of combustible walls, openings or combustible roof eave lines. Hydrant locations and flow rate are to be verified by plat sponsor and provide verification to the Spokane County Department of Building and Safety prior to finalization of this plat. 8 • 4 /I Chaff p•r •I..I... y.. ....•. •• • •.•••••w.• nee t rotas. d: COU st O < li car FOURTH AVE Fire tation ./ ••19 I1. y a5ne ww•w..�..•� • off gli gi b 7:Th PE-1390-80 - 12 - PLANNING REPORT February 19, 1987 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF RE: CHANGE OF CONDITIONS: REDESIGN OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT I. GENERAL INFORMATION PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT PUDE -2 -80, Planned Unit Development Sponsor: 838 -2511 Dwight J. Hume S. 107 Howard Spokane, WA 99204 Location: Adjacent to and south of 8th Avenue, approximately one block west of Felts Road in Section 20, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. Proposal: To revise the approved subdivision and PUD from a 24 -unit townhouse project to a 5 -lot subdivision containing five 8 -plex buildings for a total of 40 units. II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION A. Site Size: 2.48 acres; Overall Density: 16 units per acre B. Comprehensive Plan: URBAN, within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. C. Site Characteristics: The site is undeveloped or vacant and relatively flat. D. Neighborhood Characteristics: A mix of established and undeveloped properties - University City Shopping Mall exists to the north with University High School to the south with various multiple family uses to the east and single family to the west. E. Zoning: Zoned Multiple Family Suburban. No rezoning required or requested. F. Land Use: Site - North East South West - Surveyor /Enqineer: 328 -5853 Undeveloped. Single family, varied lot sizes. Scattered vacant parcels, nursing home, apartments. University High School, a nursing home, apartments. Mixture of uses, residential, commercial and mobile home park. - 13 - Adams & Clark W. 1803 Maxwell Avenue Spokane, WA 99201 stS• DRr51N. 1 `. i...f IfLO '....:I F. .. • 1(LSWM)w:, 1 1 !lRFCl .. • :• • I 016,0 1 1 .. .+ 1 ... • 1 ) 0440 1, 134.60 • .1) _ ;', i 41, 45 1 $ 1 3 1 4 1 1 L. 'Il-L l.a I . W a' 1. .' 4 to D (+.o) ti .4.4...44%....{ W% 1 1,1 1 III 8TH AVE. P E - 139 0 80 a • • ",OJBG'. I NFO?,MATION P. U. D. E -2 - 80 lc., 4e. nu tut: MI4. Wars,, sit ITr.:.. I 4.4441 n Laafra• L51 sat: i315u s 0.(2.52 u.) b..>..4 ,M.rf : VI,Na • la • Y 1 ti .40 Win IM ..L,JY Uu.f♦ 4•4•46,5 r.aruxf; a,..': (4. 1 +.I.. u w.n sulk) ,1340%2 rs0...: 25.45/ s r. MT0LIw ILll,.4: Y- bunt .A sass. I K.4r... • 44 - R%4.r'.>. J. 14.40. rl4: !. Y wrf a Lr0L! Yi.Orswb Tansy ftua4 .' 44.4M4.T YY■ LLUL nut.; 13.,24 uwourn,S .' .0 ru.r,L, u% (Tun, ur.r.x '.. 4.', .4 •••• MO •.L s,,.P,4.t..4 4.a.. rl'y\...t S_ IT_E PLAN v ILL i!5C5.OTICN 4_444. :L.. • I .on: >C ✓r .1 , 2;44 r 1.r.11. .>o..,., • +\ r...-.uv vl 4 64f.t, a 134s 1.. 1.0. °I c. 4 nu40 ' IICINITT MAP w w.\ ARCHITECTS &'ASSOCIATES, Mwn..ltscHi R14t1.4t? • 1. • C ■ uFw1 Mt'r.14wMI„4 -1 �Nt, �fl��'i��i'_•M'ilel.S�] TT . 2 If>r>4l0 IuwJ \O Wrt 4,. 001; ' p.D ED GUNNING 4 WuNru1T,J M4.F twiC.Y ";nY: 9Yp.q Fg4y)16 - yf:; YTK)IM1N'Stti�OL'1�I,IN)� W��(�7� e 1 PLANNING REPORT, February 19, 1987 PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT Change of Condition II SITE PLAN INFORMATION (cont'd) G. Special Information: Circulation - The site plan provides 22 ft. private road loop access which accesses 8th Avenue on the east and west property lines of the proposal, very similar to the original approval. Design - The design proposes five 2 -story 8- plexes each on their own lot with the 6th lot being non - buildable and includes common areas, such as parking, road access, landscape areas. The design provides buffering through rear and side yard separation to adjacent uses. The private proposed road does allow for extension to the east and west as it extends to those property lines. Change of Condition Request - The following summary information was taken from the request by the applicant for the Change of Condition. Northwood Properties, Inc. has seen a change of market place demand occur while finalizing Esther's Replat #1 and PUDE -2 -80. A need still remains for small, multi - family lots for investor purchasers, and an unnecessary zoning standard of setbacks and public road lots frontages brings. the need for flexibility inherent in the PUD overlay zone. Generally, the site is changing from a 24 -unit townhouse project to five 8 -plex units on five individual lots. The change of PUD standards from the previous approval to the present proposal are shown below: As Approved As Proposed PUD Standards: Gross property area: Net development area: Number of lots: Lot sizes: Number of units 24 Number of units allowed: 43 Actual building site coverage: 27,541 SF (32 %) Allowable building site coverage 30,255 SF (35 %) Paved access surface area: 21,027 SF Parking spaces provided: 53 Parking spaces required: 36 Open space provided: 58,817 SF (68 %) Open space required: 56,132 SF (65 %) 107,948 SF (2.48 acres) Same 86,358 SF (1.98 acres) Same 24 with private accessd 5 with private access 9 @ 1670 SF; 15 @ 1440 SF 5 from 15,080 SF to 18,055 SF - 15 - 40 Same 19,000 SF (22 %) Same 29,050 SF 96 60 67,358 SF (78 %) Same PLANNING REPORT, February 19, 1987 PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT Change of Condition II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (Cont'd) G. Special Information (Cont'd) Drainage - Drainage plans are required to be approved by the County Engineers. Water Supply - Spokane Suburban will provide water. An approved water Plan will be required prior to finalizing this preliminary plat. Sewage Disposal - Drainfield and septic systems are proposed and located in the yard areas of the 8- plexes. Each unit is required to be double plumbed and also a dry sewer connection is required. School - The proposal is in the Central Valley School District #356. Fire Protection - The proposal is located within Fire District #1. The Fire District and County Building and Safety Department (Fire Marshall) are required to approve fire protection provisions prior to finalizing the preliminary plat. Cultural Resources - None have been identified III. HISTORY /ANALYSIS The proposal was originally Esther's Addition, which was recorded as a final plat which in turn finalized Multiple Family Suburban zoning on the property. Later, this same 2.48 acre property was processed as Esther's Replat with 26 lots as a PUD overlay zone. Today the sponsor wishes to change the PUD concept as stated above and requests final PUD approval as a "Change of Condition" from original PUD approval granted by the Hearing Examiner Committee with an Extension of Time request in May of 1984. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the County Planning Department staff. The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws and the standard Conditions of Approval. County Planning Department has determined that "No probable significant adverse impacts" would result from the proposal being developed and has issued a Determination of Non- Significance ( "DNS "). The "DNS" was circulated to 10 other agencies of jurisdiction and other agencies /departments affected by the future development for review and comment. The "DNS" comment period ends February 18, 1987 and was advertised 15 calendar days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners 400 feet of the proposal, by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site and by letter to the general mailing list. Hearing Examiner Committee may consider additional environmental related testimony and the "DNS" at the public hearing. - 16 - PLANNING REPORT, February 19, 1987 PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT Change of Condition V. LEAD AGENCY SUMMARY Upon review of the extensive history of this property, the Planning Department recommends approval of the conditions of the requested Change of Condition and Final PUD approval for Esther's Replat. Given the site design of the PUD and the land use changes that have occurred in the vicinity, the increase in density requested is consistent and compatible with adjacent properties. VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. 1. That the below listed conditions of all Departments and Agencies are binding upon the applicant, owner(s) of the property, heirs, successors or assigns. COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2. The Spokane County Subdivision Administrator shall review any proposed Final Plat to insure compliance with the Findings and Conditions of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. 3. That approval of the PUD Development Plan shall meet the requirements of Final PUD approval. However, the actual PUD overlay zoning shall not be mapped on the County zoning maps until the Final Plat of Esther's Replat is recorded. 4. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for three (3) years to March 1, 1990. The applicant may request an Extension of Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 5. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat, for distribution to the County Planning Department, Utilities Department, Engineering Department, Health District and applicable utility companies. Written approval of said utility easements by said utility companies must be received with the submittal of the final plat. 6. That a current certificate of title be furnished the County Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 7. Final Plat dedication shall state: "No lot shall be further subdivided for purposes of creating additional lots without filing a replat." 8. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Subdivision Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. Protective covenants be reviewed and approved by the Subdivision Administrator prior to finalization of the plat. - 17 - PLANNING REPORT, February 19, 1987 PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT Change of Condition VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) Planning Department (Cont'd) 9. That a plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection be approved by the water supplier, fire protection district, Spokane County Building & Safety Department and County health authorities. The agencies will certify on the WATER PLAN, prior to the filing of the final plat or any phase of the preliminary plat that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The WATER PLAN and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved WATER PLAN. The time schedule will provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat sponsor shall also sign the WATER PLAN to confirm the contractual arrangements or agreements. The final plat dedication will contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building & Safety Department, and water purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." 10. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements unless the applicant(s) /sponsor(s) choose to file a notarized Waiver of Notice of Action with the Spokane County Planning Department. COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT 1. That plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. - 18 - PLANNING REPORT, February 19, 1987 PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT Change of Condition VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) Engineer Department (Cont'd) 2. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. An on -site drainage plan for the disposal of stormwater must be submitted to the County Engineer prior to release of building permits. 3. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 4. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 5. All construction within the existing or proposed public Right -of -Way is to be completed prior to filing each final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 6. The applicant should be advised that individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system." 7. Existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and curbed to Spokane County standards. 8. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number One, Secondary Arterial standard for the improvements of 8th Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 4 to 6 ft. of asphalt, curb and sidewalk along the frontage of the development. 9. The proposed private road(s) as shown on the preliminary plat serving P.U.D. lots is approved by the County Engineer. 10. That private road(s) be improved to Spokane County standard for a private road Urban - Suburban standard serving P.U.D. lots. Subject to approval under Section 10.207 of the Spokane County Fire Code. 11. All vested owners shall sign and record private road documents as prescribed by the Spokane County Engineer. These documents shall be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to recording with the Spokane County Auditor. Recording numbers shall be referenced in the dedicatory languagea of the plat. - 19 - at PLANNING REPORT, February 19, 1987 PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT Change of Condition VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) Engineer Department (Cont'd) 12. That the following statement be placed in the plat dedication: WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain, or otherwise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road as provided herein ". 13. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees in new construction. 14. That the following statement must appear in the dedicatory language of the plat: The private road as shown hereon is an easement which provides a means of ingress and egress for those lots within the plat having frontage thereon. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the-Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. 2. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibited. 3. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that suitable sites for on -site sewage disposal systems are available on lots 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5. 4. The dedicatory language of the plat will state that: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on -site sewage disposal systems may be authorized." 5. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 6. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." - 20 - PLANNING REPORT, February 19, 1987 PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT Change of Condition VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No.80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific applicaton approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94 ". 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 4. A dry sewer connection to the future area -wide Sewerage System is to be constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer connection are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department prior to finalization of this action. 1. c t 02 WOUO �ctd " E \a n eet \tsT c o� ln; s Qvo,P c.T C w-i & ()rn4 v'LcAC u w �c ; ,, n, .' TAX a 5-Ct 0 a- 1 � a �c r _ I �c c L � � t t� 11 - T L • rn e,ka *0 Sc�aae., ' k z , cc 1.maR vim. x 9r; '� a,Qt . `� \ QiiLC� oY , Q 0 o C� t, C¢,a * a-� Thu J .,d t&s2_„ \:) rr& wcQ�4 � � b v �Q ct cr -v-a ovv art e a - - C1 ev - 'nu ' 1 . ' 0 A a - v a - a1A> — / o zo ___ 7 8-2 1 -c41 a t eu as 4 *0 tJvLcaa-49 -- CIA ciurul-ct, i aretL �' (,D , w ttL-a-QtiQ, . to cc,t Q7i S aLQ _49 n'n o e a - 21 - A \t F. t ■ f y� / /Ye Order No. 59283 Cedar Builders E. 907 Rosewood Spokane, Washington LuA1r C4- 33 First American Title Company of Spokane West 704 First Avenue '• Spokane, Wa. 99204 • (509) 456 -0550 • FAX (509) 747 -2761 PLAT CERTIFICATE 3. RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT: RECEIVED OCT 23 • Nt$ County Engineering NOTE: Plus interest as to each amount Proposed Plat of: PE 1390 -80 Esther's Replat PUDE 2 -80 This certificate as of September 28, 1987 at 8:00 A.M., for a plat of the following described property: Lot 2, Block 1, ESTHER'S ADDITION, according to plat recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, Page 33, in Spokane County, Washington. This Company certifies that record title is vested in ROBERT FRANK NELSON AND ESTHER B. NELSON. HUSBAND AND WIFE, free from all liens, encumbrances and objections, except as follows: 1. DELINQUENT GENERAL TAXES: Year: 1987 Amount: $1,093.76 Tax Account No.: 20541 -2302 2. Right of way for ditches and pipelines as provided for in contract to Modern Electric Water Company, dated November 4, 1905, recorded in Volume "E" of Contracts, Page 267. Inquiry should be made as to any unpaid charges by Modern Electric Water Company. Grantee: The Washington Water Power Company, a Washington Corporation Purpose: to erect, construct, reconstruct and maintain an electrical distribution line and appurtenances Recorded: November 16, 1948 Auditor's File No.: Not Disclosed Volume /Page: 576/084 Said Easement recites: It is understood and agreed that said easement covers the right to construct an electric distribution line along the West property line in the location as now staked thereon. *CONTINUED* Order No. 59283 Page 2 4. REAL ESTATE CONTRACT, TERMS, PROVISIONS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS THEREOF: Seller:. Robert Frank Nelson and Esther B. Nelsen, husband and wife Purchaser:' Gunning Builders, Inc., a Corporation Dated: February 9, 1979 Recorded: June 16, 1981 Auditor's File No.: 8106160067 Excise. Tax Receipt No:: 199996 Said Contract is a re- recording of Contract recorded under Auditor's File No. 7902140331. 5. Provisions contained and easements imposed in the Plat and Dedication of Esther's Addition, recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, Page 33, as hereto attached. 6. EASEMENT AS DELINEATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT: Purpose: Utility Purposes Location: The South 10 feet of the East 10 feet of the North 10 feet and the West 10 feet of Lot 2 7. Provisions contained and easements imposed in Declaration of Protective Covenants of University Townhouses recorded June 19,1981, under Auditor's File No. 8106190002. 8. Any assessment not or hereafter levied under the provisions contained in the below mentioned Declaration Article, or as may be established by any bylaws or amendments adopted thereafter. Article No.: IV Auditor's File No.: 8106190002 9. DEED OF TRUST: Grantor: Northwood Properties, Inc., formerly Gunning Builders, Inc. and Theodore G. Gunning and Diane D. Gunning, husband and wife, and Theodore G. Gunning, dealing in his sole and separate property Trustee: Ticor Title Insurance Company Beneficiary: Washington Trust Bank, a corporation Original Amount: $825,000.00 Dated: November 3, 1986 Recorded: November 7, 1986 Auditor's File No.: 8611070047 Volume /Page: 855/1696 *CONTINUED* Order No. 59283 Page 3 10. Right, title and interest of Cedar Builders as disclosed by application for title insurance. This Company further certifies that all taxes and assessments levied and chargeable have been fully paid except as noted above. MSA /jg FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF SPOKANE M k S. A pinwall Provisions contained and easements imposed in the Plat and Dedication of Esther's Addition, recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, Page 33, as hereto attached. A public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot, Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the coordinated water system plan for Spokane County. Use of private wells and private water system is prohibited. No lot shall be further subdivided for purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. The owner, his grantee and assigns agree to participate in and not oppose or protest a Road Improvement District or County Road Project on Fourth Avenue. The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID)pursuant to RCW, Chapter 36.94 as amended. The owner, his heirs or successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. The method of sewage treatment and disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. First A merican Title Company of Spokane , Vest 704 First Avenue • Spokane. Wa.shinglnn'99204 • 1 .509)456-0550 ORDER NO.` 3 / t4AP VOLJPAGE33 / SEC TWR c N a§ , sis pi- ig5 - 4.T11— AVENUE —'- I 7) ,: a ;( �s W 4L J N I1 IW I 0 0; 10 0I41, I.%M[xl LOT I BLOCK 1 ' .:34 ML•a1 C5 : lei .L,. eat. P.3..0011• rvn, M.( _ MYOI aI " q' NLII. Ur! Y,1 1 L — 01r 11 I 1 1 E L '' 132.001 8 LOT 2 tat 1 J _ 235 liffi:I'na, lC,,la:< .1 Vi,ll1 r.sIMlxl O I0 b t0 l N. Mo M om 1 10 Lrn D.J l 4ale _i Id N O O 04 RGE This sketch is furnished as a courtesy only by First American Title Insurance Company and it . is NOT a part of any title commitment or policy 9f title insurance. This sketch is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and does not purport to show all highways, roads or easements affecting the property. No reliance should be placed upon this sketch for the location or dimensions of the property and no liability is assumed for the correctness thereof. Affiliated with First American Title Insurance Company TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: COUNTY ENGINEER'S DEPARTMENT 4A & PLDE -2.-4 SUBJECT: ROAD CONDITIONS' FOR PLAT NAME EczAkeR.3 NUMBER PEi 1390 -80 * CONDITIONS CIRCLED APPLY TO PLAT -UNDER CONSI ERATION OFFICE. OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKAIf COUNTY, WAMIINGTON that conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer is given subject to dedication of Right -of -Way and approval of the road system as Indicated In the preliminary plat of record. that plans, profiles, and cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. that drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing. of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a Iicensed Professional Civil Engineer. 1\N oN$rte do rage Plo.n for t he di sc` si.( o� >tro Y'rnw \t v s`.UAST be Sub ny en: tted 7o xhe eou el. /Yee:2 paiovfl to /e4:e a E 4 -th a 't d , the F regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. A development permit shall be obtained from the County Engineer before construction or development begins within any area of special flood hazard (reference Spokane County Ordinance 81- 0726). construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate In writing that all improve- ments were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced; no construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work Is subject to Inspection and approval by the County Engineer; all construction within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way Is to be com- pleted prior to tiling the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certifica- tion, "As Built" plans, and monumentlng the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer; E 8 -no direct access from lots to 1/2 Right of Ways until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads; E 9 -no direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads; ElO -road design, construction, and drainage control for 1/2 Right of Ways and Stub Road connections are the responsibil ity of the Developer; Ell -that appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held In trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A I ft, strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Tem- . porary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) EI -the applicant should be advised that individual driveway access permits are required prior to Issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. E13- dedication of additional Right of Way along additional Right of Way along additional Right of Way along E14 -a statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to E15 -that a statement be placed in the plat dedication providing for future slope ease- ments as required by Spokane County along existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and /yo curbed to Spokane County standards. E17 -that all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. E18 -that sidewalks are required along the arterial(s) on • uve ,19 the word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. E20 -to construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approv- al of the County Engineer, Join In and be a willing participant' In any petition or resolution which purposes is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvements pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. At such time as an RID Is crea- •ted or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the Improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. E21 -as an alternative method of constructing the road improvement stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improve- ments stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road project (CRP) to the extent of the required road improvement. At such time as an RID Is created or any Road improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements re- quired (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. E22 -that the following statement shall be placed in the plat dedication: The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road improvement District (RID) by the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition Includes the owner(s) property, and further not to object, by the signing of a ballot, the formation of a RID by the resolution method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which resolution includes the owner(s) property. If a RID is formed by either the petition or resolution method, as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: (I) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID Is feasible, (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed. Provided, further, the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for In conjunction with the formation of a RID by either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36,88 RCW. E23 -The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number standard for the Improvement of (Road, Street, Avenue) which Is to be constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installation of ft. of asphalt, curb and sidewalk. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number standard for the improvement of (Road, Street, Avenue) which Is to be constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installation of ft. of asphalt, curb and sidewalk. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number standard for the Improvement of (Road, Street, Avenue) which is to be constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installation of ft. of asphalt, curb and sidewalk. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number _ standard for the improvement of (Road, Street, Avenue) which Is to be constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installation of ft.'of asphalt, curb and sidewalk. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number (ire , `_��C &11�(ayr' c WR∎c`-k4k standard for the improvement of e,cji. Ave e 7 ER-el-, —S- treat, Araetre) which Is adjacent to the propose development. This will re- quire the addition of approximately Y fh.fG j, ft. of asphalt, curb and sidewalk along the frontage of the development. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number standard for the improvement of ' (Road, Street, Avenue) which Is adjacent to the proposed development. This will re- quire the addition of approximately ft. of asphalt, curb and sidewalk along the frontage of the development. - The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number standard for the Improvement of (Road, Street, Avenue) -which Is adjacent to the proposed development. This will re- quire the addition of approximately ft. of asphalt, curb and sidewalk along the frontage of the development. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number standard for the Improvement of (Road, Street, Avenue) which Is adjacent to the proposed development. This will re- quire the addition of approximately ft. of asphalt, curb and sidewalk along • the frontage of the development. 721/6 E25 -that the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal acceptable to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway- County Road intersection. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to tho State Highway to cover the cost of such Improvements furnished to the County Engineer In the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. the proposed private road(s) as shown on the preliminary plat serving Y•U.D lots with: —we e- x-$ews4- on— peeslb4. 44n —to ser-e 8 or 'ec= lo*r. suture pub'In Ri .,t W,,, 4reet is approved by the County Engineer. that private road(s) be Improved to Spokane County standard for a private road t4Q.pQn' ck \ttOmN standard serving Q,\ %,ij, lots. Subject to approval under section 10.207 of the Spokane County Fire Code, E28 -that the following provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the private road and the "Tract X" is deeded or dedi- cated: a I ft. strip at the ends or edges of all private "Tract X" that terminate or border the plat boundary. E29 -a statement shall be placed In the plat dedication that the "Tract X" private road(s) contained within this plat is /are for the sole use of parcels within the plat until such time as the roadway Is Improved and established as a public road. all vested owners shall sign and record private road documents as prescribed by the Spokane County Engineer, These documents shall be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to recording with the Spokane County Auditor. Record- ing numbers shall be referenced In the dedicatory language of the plat. that the following statement be placed in the plat dedication: ARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain, or other- wise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, Improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement Is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns Including the obligation to parti- cipate In the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. the proposed plat shall be Improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which establishes regula- tions for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees In new construction. the County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants +*e ' "di'ation of addltionel— r- 30t --ef way —and the roadway Improvements herein specified. E34 -this plat or development proposal Is located within a drainage basin which has been identified by the Spokane County Engineer's Office as having stormwater runoff prob- lems. Since this plat or development proposal Is affected by or is a contributor to stormwater flows, property owners should participate In the planning and implementa- tion of a future basinwide stormwater management system. The following "Condition of Approval" shall be required: That the owner(s) or successor(s) in Interest agree to Join In any County approved Stormwater Management Program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fixed through public hearings for service or benefit obtained by the planning, design, constructing, maintaining, or operation of stormwater control facilities. that the following statement must appear In the dedicatory language of the plat: The private road as shown hereon is an easement which provides a means of ingress and egress for those lots within the plat having frontage thereon. TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: COUNTY ENGINEER'S DEPARTMENT - 'I 7 PUD6 - z -8 SUBJECT: ROAD CONDITIONS' FOR PLAT NAME E5WeQS Zr{tut NUMBER Pe 5390-$0 * CONDITIONS CIRCLED APPLY TO PLAT UNDER CONSIDERATION OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASIIINGTON TaHuwri 30 , 19 8?? that conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer is given subject to dedication of Right -of -Way and approval of the road system as Indicated In the preliminary plat of record. that plans, profiles, and cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Chill Engineer. that drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. AtA oN -sate dreOnage E ° l4n -for The dI 4Q X40 o r S nwn AU& Yt r,;€r t be Submitted to me Coen . 4Fig &Aeta w pav'fa re /ease / e m t pcv , t E 4 - at t h'e regula of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. A development permit shall be obtained from the County Engineer before construction or development begins within any area of special flood hazard (reference Spokane County Ordinance 81- 0726). construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate In writing that all Improve- ments were Installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced; no construction work Is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way until a permit has been Issued by the County Eng ineer, All work is subject to Inspection and approval by the County Engineer; all construction within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way Is to be com- pleted prior to filing the final plat or a bond In the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of Improvements, construction certifica- tion, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer; E 8 -no direct access from lots to 1/2 Right of Ways until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads; E 9 -no direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads; E10 -road design, construction, and drainage control for 1/2 Right of Ways and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the Developer; Ell -that appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held In trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A I ft, strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Tem- . porary cul de, sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) El -the applicant should be advised that individual driveway access permits are required prior to Issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. E13- dedication of additional Right of Way along additional Right of Way along additional Right of Way along E14 -a statement shall be placed In plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to • E15-that a statement be placed In the plat dedication providing for future slope ease- ments as required by Spokane County along existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and /so curbed to Spokane County standards. E17 -that all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. E18 -that sidewalks are required along the arterial(s) on ova the word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. E20 -to construct the road Improvements stated herein, the appl icant may, with the approv- al of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant In any petition or resolution which purposes Is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said Improvements pursuant to RCM 36.88, as amended. At such time as an RID is crea- ted or any Road improvement Project Is sanctioned by Spokane County, the Improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. E21 -as an alternative method of constructing the road improvement stated heroin, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improve- ments stated herein by joining and participating In a County Road project (CRP) to the extent of the required road Improvement. At such time as an RID Is created or any Road Improvement Project Is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements re- quired (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. E22 -that the following statement shall be placed in the plat dedication: The owner(s) or successor(s) In interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition Includes the owner(s) property, and further not to object, by the signing of a ballot, the formation of a RID by the resolution method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which resolution Includes the owner(s) property. If a RID is formed by either the petition or resolution method, as provided for In Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID Is feasible, (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed. Provided, further, the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW. E23 -The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number standard for the improvement of (Road, Street, Avenue) which is to be constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installation of ft. of asphalt,' curb and sidewalk, The County Engineer has designated - Typical Roadway Section Number • standard for the improvement of (Road, Street, Avenue) which Is to be constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installation of ft. of asphalt, curb and sidewalk. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number standard for the improvement of • (Road, Street, Avenue) which Is to be constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installation of ft. of asphalt, curb and sidewalk. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number standard for the improvement. of (Road, Street, Avenue) which is to be constructed within the proposed development. This will require the Installation of ft. of asphalt, curb and sidewalk. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number n re , `;ecntlr1Ay Ne■e`-iuk\ standard for the improvement of e; VA AVP (-Rrad -- Street, Ar-enve') which Is adjacent to the propose e development. This will re- quire the addition of approximately q ft ft. of asphalt, curb and sidewalk along the frontage of the development. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number standard for the improvement of (Road, Street, Avenue) which Is adjacent to the proposed development. This will re- quire the addition of approximately ft. of asphalt, curb and sidewalk along the frontage of the development. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number standard for the improvement of (Road, Street, Avenue) which Is adjacent to the proposed development. This will re- quire the addition of approximately ft. of asphalt, curb and sidewalk along the frontage of the development. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number standard for the improvement of (Road, Street, Avenue) which Is adjacent to the proposed development. This will re- quire the addition of approximately ft. of asphalt, curb and sidewalk along the frontage of the development. E25 -that the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal acceptable to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway- County Road Intersection, State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway to cover the cost of such improvements furnished to the County Engineer In the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department, 721/6 the proposed private road(s) — n.o— e- w$e-31 n—pe -s 1 -AJ- Ri „f --We-, *reet is approved as shown on the preliminary plat by the County Engineer. serving Y.U.D lots with: that private road(s) be Improved to Spokane County standard for a private road WaSbO;n 9 SXXI„A : VI.,0 standard serving QAx,lo, lots. Subject to approval under section 10.207 of the Spokane County Fire Code. E28 -that the following provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the private road and the "Tract X" Is deeded or dedi- cated: a I ft. strip at the ends or edges of all private "Tract X" that terminate or border the plat boundary. E29 -a statement shall be placed in the plat dedication that the "Tract X" private road(s) contained within this plat is /are for the sole use of parcels within the plat until such time as the roadway Is improved and established as a public road. all vested owners shall sign and record private road documents as prescribed by the Spokane County Engineer. These documents shall be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to recording with the Spokane County Auditor. Record- ing numbers shall be referenced in the dedicatory language of the plat. that the following statement be placed In the plat dedication: - WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, Improve, maintain, or other- wise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be Issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns including the obligation to parti- cipate in the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. the proposed plat shall be Improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which establishes regula- tions for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees In new construction. the County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the Impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants +he elgA -et tJo, and the roadway Improvements herein specified. E34 -this plat or development proposal is located within a drainage basin which has been identified by the Spokane County Engineer's Office as having stormwater runoff prob- lems. Since this plat or development proposal Is affected by or Is a contributor to stormwater flows, property owners should participate In the planning and Implementa- tion of a future basinwide stormwater management system. The following "Condition of Approval" shall be required: That the owner(s) or successor(s) In Interest agree to Join in any County approved Stormwater Management Program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fixed through public hearings for service or benefit obtained by the planning, design, constructing, maintaining, or operation of stormwater control facilities. that the following statement must appear In the dedicatory language of the plat: The private road as shown hereon Is an easement which provides a means of ingress and egress for those lots within the plat having frontage thereon, Give detailed explanation Seta ttach'ed Exhibit "B" of request County, Washington. t. Status ' . 1; • ' „ • ; i'...fr.' "..,,SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING'DEPARTMENT "A t..J et, het -,i _.,t r, -c.c.-y."7 ‘, 1 r FOR CHANGE OF CONDITIONS FOR AN APPROVED SUBDIVISION: I' nifi nk , ... ,„ .0 v: -...”0“; Ar 4 14;: ilidt irt ;) 4 "il Ft 4, A Date: , "..y); pe ' cemb ;: e lf r e4're4 ;1;1 4 ;86 7 . 414111't4 ”V"I':**nil 1' "" . 1.6 ' "611, tr l'' r Application No: E-'1 90 ;;:a 'Id : FUDE fit ..„i. , tr.../v.t.' . „ . .. - ..... • i I ,, , . t .t. . . ii. ni .. ....., i r Name/of ,Applicant :.;., .,; nort nwooa r rope rt les I nc: ,7 ci o Dw 1 gh ti. J I. Hume. 1 .:In*I;1 15li :11;. :.. • .6 J „ f lit . :a- ... 4 4.• • ...4,4“ .. ,,.. l ' eet Addreas-James ,S. Black & Co:," Inc.,. South 107 Howa rd . ' e '.1" .- r.'n' . . 1 - r r ; 1 . , lic tfi: c.- c: -.- " ivc :;'4 4 liate WA -. tz Zone M FS :try! P „ , of Late: .1:4 Date A. f!kt- F FA' ACce Zip Coder 99204 Tel. "No: 838-2511 Proposed Zoning: . • Same and PUD:1Th.. Preliminan Approva 1 Expires : June 1, .1987 . ., . . .,. , — . .F,: ;:''gal Description Of . Property: '. Lot 2, Block 1, Esther 'S Addition as recorded . : : 2.: :: i.•,.;' b , Vi,;" 'I ' aitn Vol ume •16 ; Page ecor dS of Spokane • x' - • .. • the proposal: , `Al . • • DEVELOPMENT'bF.THE SITE WILL BE CHANGED SUBSTANTIALLY BY THIS REQUEST, OR pg LATHE PROPERTY HAS BOUNDARIES DIFFERENT THAN ORIGINALLY PROPOSED, A REVISED . .1f DEVELOPMENT PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED AND SIGNED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING, t ' ENGINEERING AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENTS AND THE E COUNTY HEALDJ-DISTRICT. ..t? SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT: a'' 4 "- (if different than Applicant's) • • /d7 _ 0 cS rz" ■ ' S / ' t - . -- )144)/ . /;5;:i ' • .4 . ..t • . , 6 9 2 0 9 ." • J., tie It I f 1 1f, ALt SIGNATURE' BLACKS' MUST BE F73d.ED IN,' IF,'APPROPRIATE,`,, BEFORE RETURNING: TO 'THE SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR ; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS { f I33'1 0' �✓ �((((+� N. g , u�i5 P'. • 1 P;. , Y �14 eta t „��� ' ` il. „I x : f d �k undersigned,';have• completed the information' requested; and the I plat has been prepared by me under my supervision in accordance rements of. the Spokane unty / Planning Department and the laws Washington., ...i /.'. r.� . 3!n. Signed $ �j t� � CL .` Y Date: Li Address Phone. ADAMS & CLARK, INC Zip W. 1803 Maxwell x' SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 ' : 509 328 5853 ' I, *� "r � �If�l�� �, %r.__•. d "swear the e enal prju # h , t ,rt l � � � p ty oft perjury that the above , { re = •�•:. made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. i I further jewear that I AN THE OWNER OF RECORD of the site proposed as the preliminary /, ;'plat, or if not the owner, attached herewith is a written permission from said, owner authorizing my actions on his or her behalf. I also understand, should there by any willful misrepresentation or willful lack or full disclosre on my i part„ . Spokane County may withdraw any Declaration of Non - Significance that it might issue in reliance upon this chedklist. Purveyor's Name gnature & Title . � , Y' ,y ,. lrt v , Dat e :r Signed:' // _ �'xLU � i - .., d Date: Address: Phone: Zip: t >'' NOTARY:. ��L� PJ /v 11/� s �= ± :' Date: ;?..)4 9/ 9 PART 'II TO BE COMPLETED BY WATER PURVEYOR j!7 R y i a subdivision (is) (is not) 'situated within our service area. We are (able) (not able) & willing to supply this subdivision with :+ adequate water for (domestic) (fire) (industrial) (commercial) uses. ,;','` *, Satisfactory arrangement (have) (have not) been made to serve this ° r osal. µSignature (oily when items A,° B'& C are true' And completed) »tPrivate.(weils) (water system) is (approved). (denied) as an interim `water .', !r „ source:+itikl n � 1I•: p ;not) been satisfied subject to submission & of drainage tA calculations and drainage plan , Ji �� 11111 \;-� +gin + 1 �.:.. n 1 . . ';Ti' -'TO IS BE COMPELT BY COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1 "'Lines Depar .;, nt requirements for preliminary plat have been a nti ' `.r'. v . '' -' .I ;'' ". . ?! -PART VI - TO BE COMPLETED BY COUNTY BUILDING & SAFETY!' mos ' £ow "of �j y "gallons p � I er minute required for proposal. . 1' ... ' i 'f f ib �' 7* GJ Signatur &Title M `,;' 'Jt . Date �,ll OART III TO BE COMPLETED BY SPOKANE COUNTY 'HEALTH DISTRICT Health Districtfataff .hae'(has not) completed a field investigation of the site. Health'D strict requirements for preliminary' plats have (have not) been satisfied. . PART'IV TO' BE COMPL BY COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE ' .4;'County Engineer'i"Offide requirements for preliminary plats have'.(bave, Use to document all meetings with external parties dealing with County position on proposals. T LS Pn' Orl/ , ( ONV 5 • - -Mee. s With: S /I'n doj At ryv (tic Represented By: l ICE pn ) Lt. I Jef County Attendees: ' � / EuS 07'/ Specific Topic(s): E..I. Proposals Presented: 509/6 kVr. K A MEETING RECORD PL e1 f L Was There Concurrence? \r-"E's S) )N) K/S oq' $ A )AJEr L ,v wiy --rH S i Use back or additional sheets for detail of meeting if Date: 7-2,2-e9 File No.: i /l ''o M\Ka ASK8D c - rHJ Ro o°L 8 i-f AP�ceb D o/K Pe, t3 a4 L E siE )s. (Z!✓ At `.�I 6U L.D 1Q I V A L 1 f= C 42 Pt T OF Ej 2�\ AP Q . County Position Stated. Z M/ ) C A Tgi P LANs Ix/ 071-1-D 1] V/t4 L) (P• `i H E. L E V } '7 /o S S H o AI , oN THE PLAN( `rl x \ST /NC uEvAT1dJNLS, e4e ck Distribution: 1) Project Elie 2) Division Head 3) Co. Engineer 4) Attendees necessary. L� L ■Pow411 coumn Lou Y\ County Engineer; Utilities; Health District; To: Building & Safety FROM: Doug Adams, Subdivision Administrator SUBJECT; REVIEW AND COMMENTS FOR BELOW LISTED PLATS FOR HEARING OF FEBRUARY 1987 Please review and return comments for the following plats by February 6, 1987 1. PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT - Change of Conditions PUDE -2 -80 2. PN- 1507 -86, FOREST HILLS 3RD ADDITION ZN- 57 -86, Agricultural to UR 3.5 3. PS- 1539 -87, SMITH & VAIL ADDITION toAnt , s" ut,f,a 4em X w / (M /( ,eGu+ DATE January 16 OFFICE Or °THE Snag PLANNING EEPART`'EM _! ,. ;u , : RECEIVED ` t\ei 1 1987 County Engineering (WAC 197 -11 -960) Section 11.10.230(1) Purpose of Checklist: SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE Environmental Checklist P L6 1390 80 File No. PE 1390 - 80 POD -2 -80 The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) lust be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse Impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (end to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can he done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the beat of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write 'do not know' or 'does not apply.' Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will describe your proposal or Its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered `does not apply'. IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(Part 0). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words 'project," - applicant, and "property or site' should be read as 'proposal,' "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A, BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Not formally assigned Name of Applicant: Northwood Properties Inc., c/o D. J. Hume Address and phone number of applicant or contact person: James S. Black & Co.. Inc. South 107. Howard, Spokane, WA 99204 Phone: 838 -2511 Date checklist prepared: December 17. 1986 Agency requesting checklist: Spokane County Planning Department Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if •pplicable): Complete project to begin April 1987 7. a. Do you have any plans for future addition, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yea, explain._ No b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, explain. Nn 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Previous project approval included a threshold determination of non-significance for 20 townhouse units. (MAC 19) -11 -960) Section 11.10.230(1) BACKGROUND (continued) No TO BE COMPLETED By APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELOIHITs SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal/ If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Spokane County Planning, Building Codes, Engineers, Utilities, and Health District 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, Including the proposed uses and the site of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checitllat that you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on v this page. The project Is a 2 0 acre site rontaining 5, eight -plex buildings, for a total of 40 units. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information to • person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, Including • street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site (a). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, If reasonably available. While you should submit any plans requi ed by the • ency y are not egplred o duplicate maps or detailed plans bmltted with any permit application related to this checklist.. Proposal is l u located- in the pokane Valley Spokane a Avenue. approximately 430 west of Felts Road. ' See site plan of record. 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? 'The General Sewer Service Area? The Priority Sever Service Area? The City of Spokane? (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay Zone Atlas for boundaries). Yes, Yes, Yes, No. 1. EARTH a. General descrlpj }on of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep elopes, mountainous, other: flat b. That is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? N/A What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. General types of soil are Valley gravel d. Are there surface Indications or history of unstable nail. In the immediate vicinity? If • , describe. No Evaluation For Agency Use Only (MAC 197 -11 -960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS(contlnued) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE 3 e. Describe the purpose, type, ang approximate quaptitles of any fillips or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. minimal grading to remain on site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construc- tion (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately.:45 %. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Compliance with 208 storm water prevention 2. AIR a. What type of emlaaions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors Industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantitea if known. Wnnrl sn nl(P f reran fireplaces and dust from construction activity: b. Are there any off -site sources of emiagigns or odor that ay of ec4 yopr propeosal? If o generally describe. other residential an d multi- tamily uni ts nearby causing traffic and /or fireplace emissions. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Energy efficient fireplaces and adequate off - street parking. Other dust preventive measures in compliance with air pollution control standards for construction will be used,,. 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yea, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No No (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Evaluation for Agency Use Only (WAG 1197 -11- 960)` Section 11.10.230(1) I. ENVIRONNEJTAL gLIKENTS (continued). (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed In or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general descrip- tion, purpome, and approximate quantities If known. No (5) Does the proposal lie within • 100 -year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materiels to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No No N/A SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE 4 GROUND: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Glee general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if know (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sanitary waste treatment facility. Describe the general site of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable) or, the number of persons the system(s) are expected to serve. On -site septic with double plumbing to.allow for hookup to regional sewer when available. (3) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such a s those for the disposal of storm water or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of materials likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as • result of fire fighting activities). None (4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above ground or underground storage tanks? If so, whet types and quantities of materials will be stored? No Evaluation For Agency Use Only (WAC 197 -11 -960) Section 11.10.230(1) R. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) N/A SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE S (5) What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to ground water (this includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems described in 36(2) and 3b(3)? Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal df any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 208 storm water improvements. See site plan. (2): Will any chemicals be stored, h<ndled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or ground water or to a storm water disposal system discharging to surface or ground water? No (3) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No Proposed measures to reduce or c ontrol surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any (if the proposed action lies within the Aquifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on explanations relating to facilities concerning Sections 3b(4), lb(5), and 3c(2) of this checklist). 208 storm drainage and regional sewerinq when available. PLANTS a. Check or circle type of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other. X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other. shrub. grass. X pasture. crop or grain. wet soil plants, cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other. water plants: water lilly, eelgrasa, milfoil, other. _ other types of vegetation. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed'or altered? Pasture c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Proposed ait le a, sca i( apnyny: : i tai on p8f s tl omes`f resur4htde d'brn aPcBsffe` plan or record. Evaluation For Agency Use Only (WAG 197-11 -960) Section 11.10.130(1) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, beer, elk, beaver, other: c. Is the site part of • migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None None SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE ANIMALS e. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or neer the site or are known to be on or near the site: songbirds none fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: none other: List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. Whet kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the the completed prole t'• energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufac- turing, etc. electric, gas, wood stove. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No . . What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: UBC Standards of improvements • ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire end explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Spokane County Sheriff, and fire protection Evaluation For Agency Use Only ..Chun u.m.uvta B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1 (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazard., if any: Storm drainage improvements, sanitary sewer hookup availability, and UBC energy- efficient standards Noise: (1) What types of noise exist in the area whl h may - affect y project (for a ample: traffic, equipment, operation, other? Arter frontage (0th Avenues. multi- family projects and single - family developments in surrounding area. (2) Whet types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on • short -term or a long -tern basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other? Indicate what hours noise would come free the site. short-term-construction activity, equipment. Long term: minimal noise from traffic because of on -site availability of parking and enclosure of individual units. (y) Proposed measure to reduce or control note* impacts, if any: Architectural style of structure and accommodation of parking. LAND AND SHORELINE USE Whet is the current use of the site and adjacent propertied? Adjacent - residential and multi- family, with the site vacant at this time. Nes the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Possible pasture area. c. Describe any structures on the site. Vacant d. Will any structures be demolished? If ao, which? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the mite? MFs f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Urban If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A Hes any part of the site been classified ss to 'environmentally sensitive' area? If so, specify. No Approximately how many people would reside or work in the countered project? Approximately 100 at 2.5 persons per unit Evaluation For Agency Use Only (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230( I. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. if pny: Pun setbacks nf periphery nf the site in nrrcess of 30 feet, with fencing and landscaping proposed. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, m1 or low - income housing. 4 apartment units Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle,or low -income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. AESTHETICS a. Whet is the tallest height of any proposed sad stcture (s not Including antennas; what is the 3, vo— 31 f antennas; principal exterior building matarial(s) proposed? b. What views in the Immediate vicinity would be altered or obs None Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Materials used for surface 'improvement; i.e. cedar siding and quality roofing. Also, extra landscaping of site pursuant to site plan of record. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur Indoor lighting. Nighttime hours. Could light or glare from the finished project be • safety hazard or interfere with views? No What existing off -site sources of light or glare may effect your proposal? None Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare Impacts, II any Low intensity landscape lighting, if used on -site, will be directed on site, away from periphery of project. Evaluation For Agency Use Only (VAC 197 -11 -960) Section 11.10.230(1) S. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are In the immediately vicinity? University High School b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No Proposed measur• to reduce or control Impacts on recreation, including to be provided by the project or applicant, If any: Approximately 80% of.the site will'be left and the site is centrally located to other amenities of the Spokane Valley; i.e. Dish neighborhood parks. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for national, state, or local presena- t ion registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic archaeological, scientific or cultural importance known to be on or next to the cite. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE w recreation opportunities in open'space, recreational man Hills and 14. TRANSPORTATION s. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed acceu to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by 8th Avenue. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Unknown How many parking spaces would the completed project have? Han, many would the project eliminate? 96 will be provided. No elimination of existing parking.' Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Yes. Additional widening, curbing and sidewalks on 8th Avenue, with paved, private access to individual lots subject to county road standards. m. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or sir transportation? If • , generally describe. No Evaluation For Agency Use Only 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an Increased need for public services (for example: Fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. (WAC 197-11 -960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) C. SICNATEIE Date: S. How many vehicular trips per day ld bg generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak would occur. A t 6.5 vehicle trips per day. the project will generate 260 vehicle trips per day. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation Impecta, If any: Minimization of ingress and egress to two points along 8th Avenue, with adequate site distance. No, the available fire and police protection will be adequate. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: The project is designed to UBC URC standards and is architecturally designed with maximum security to the tenant; i.e. enclosed parking and inside access to individual units. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, otter. Electricity, gas, water, refuse service, telephone, septic system. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the Immediate vicinity which eight be needed. Sanitary seluer as avai lahle I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above .responses are made truthfully and to the beat of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepreunt. . or is ful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any determination of nonaignlficance that it might issue I ell ante upon his checklist. /a -/ 7 - g t Proponent: Dwight J. Hume Phone: 838 -2511 Person completing form: Same Phone: Same FOR STAFF USE ONLY Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: C. Proponent SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE II Add rem : (Please Inc or Type South 10 r Howard Spokane, WA 99204 P E - - .� Evaluation For Agency Use Only December 17, 1986 1390 80 Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff: Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends • determination of noneignificance. Concludes that probable significant adverse enviromental Impacts do exist for the current propoul and recommends a mitigated deter- mination of nonsignificance with conditions. C. Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends • determination of significance. FILING FEE - *75.00 rj SPOKANE :COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF CONDITIONS FOR AN APPROVED SUBDIVISION Date: December 17, 1986 Application No: PE-1390 -80; and PUDE -2 -80 Name of Applicant: Northwood Properties Inc., c/o Dwight J. Hume Street Address: City: Section: Spokane 20 Source of Legal: PROPOSED CHANGE OF Reference specific condition from the hearing). James S. Black & Co., Inc., South 107 Howard State: E - WA Existing Zone: MFS Proposed Zoning: Same and PUD Approved # of Lots: �9 Legal Description of Property: Lot 2, Block 1, Esther's Addition as recorded in Volume 16, Page 33, records of Spokane County, Washington. See attached Exhibit "A" See attached Exhibit "B" Township: 25 Range: 44 Adams and Clark Inc. CONDITIONS: SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT: 30 Zip Code: 99204 Date Preliminary Approval Expires: Tel. No: 838 -2511 June 1, 1987 Conditions of original approval. (Cite the applicable Findings & Order of the Hearing Examiner Committee's public Give detailed explanation of request for change in the status of the proposal: IF DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE WILL BE CHANGED SUBSTANTIALLY BY THIS REQUEST, OR THE PROPERTY HAS BOUNDARIES DIFFERENT THAN ORIGINALLY PROPOSED, A REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED AND SIGNED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENTS AND THE : • E COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Address — (if different than Applicant's) /. J e i / Sio C4 4 Zt4i, <�� -LCJa 99z0 �/ A. 3 an/� r..uRwiY p "t nG � '�R S , WASai t TON 9920;. _ O •••• c swears frYO uIIder ^ebQ�yldi�a�t�0� pez tl Fa - made truthfully,' and to the "best of`ay know ledge. > ......4� ?arear that I AM :TNS OWN88 OP BECOB*of -the site4roposed'as° preiiataary ` 4 plat, or if not •the ow a ner, ttached,. herewith is ;a vrittea'pernission' from said owner authorising; ay'actions';on.his or behalf. n I also waddsstaad,.should,:,'. • there by any willful misrepresentation or willful lack fulldiacloere on my. Part, Spokane County nay.withdraw.any,Declaration of Non Significance -that it night issue in rellaace`ipon / a t. k - .. -. ._. 1. -.� ... PAST `IV TO..BE COMPLETED BY COUNTY ENGINEEOS OFFI County Engineer's Office requirements', for preliminary pieta Have (have not) been satisfied subject to submission 6 approval of draina calculations and drainage plan. n ; s gnat ' Ti tle PART V - TO BE COMPELTED BY COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT County Utilities Depar-. nt requirements for_ preliminary pin ha ve (have not)/been ... " i .. ars IiYQ //IMai 0 , COMPLETED SY, =i1l1TBB:PDBV1 _ I (0 * r' �' ,.e 'T II 3 ��iy HEARING AGENDA, May 24, 1984 9 A.M. PRELIMINARY PLAT - EXTENSION OF TIME 1. PE- 1390 -80, PUDE -2 -80, Sponsor: 924 -7950 Northwood Properties E. 9616 Montgomery Spokane, WA 99206 - - * PUBL NOTICE -'< . IS HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING - May 24, 1984 PLACE: Broadway Centre Building 2nd Floor, Public Hearing Room N. 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA Telephone: 456 -2205 TIME: ESTHER'S REPLAT NO. 1 Planned Unit Development, reclassification The hearing will begin at 9 A.M. and recess from 12 NOON to 1:30 P.M. for lunch. Items not heard prior to 5 P.M. adjournment will be continued to the next available date as announced by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee. an overlay zone with MFS Surveyor /Engineer: 328 -5853 Daniel B. Clark W. 1808 Maxwell Spokane, WA 99201 Location: Located in Spokane Valley north and adjacent 8th Avenue approximately 300 ft. west of Felts Road; within Section 20, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM., Spokane County, Washington Comprehensive Plan: URBAN, within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. The sponsor is requesting an "Extension of Time" for Proposal: ESTHER'S REPLAT NO. 1 a Planned Unit Development for a zone reclassification from Agricultural to P.U.D. with MFS. page 6 zone HEARING AGENDA, May 24, 1984 - HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS - PRELIMINARY PLAT 2. PS- 1254 "C " -78, WINDSONG 3RD ADDITION page 7 ZS- 12 -79, Agricultural to R -1 Sponsor: 534 -3248 Surveyor /Engineer: 456 -0582 James P. Sargent P.O. Box 14227 Spokane, WA 99214 PRELIMINARY PLAT AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION Barbara Olsen c/o S. 104 Freya, Ste. 203 Spokane, WA 99202 2 R. E. Flagan & Associates S. 1601 Flight Road W. 9600 Block Sunset Highway Spokane, WA 99204 Location: Located south and adjacent the Spokane City Limits and adjacent and between Havana Street and Freya Street; within; Section 3, Township 24N, Range 43 EWM., Spokane County, Washington Comprehensive Plan: URBAN, within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. Proposal: The sponsor is requesting a Change - of - Condition for preliminary plat WINDSONG 3RD ADDITION and zone reclassification from Agricultural to R -1. The "change" involves a minor alignment shift of the prliminary plat roads to match existing City road of Myrtle. 3. PE- 1462 -84, MOHAWK ESTATES page 8 ZE- 58 -84, Agricultural to R -1 Sponsor: 534 -5272 Surveyor /Engineer 534 -5272 J. Ronald Dunsmore S. 104 Freya, Ste 203 Spokane, WA 99202 Location: Located in the "Painted Hills" area of Spokane Valley west and adjacent Mohawk Drive /Cree Drive Intersection; within Section 3, Township 24N, Range 44 EWM., Spokane County, Washington Comprehensive Plan: SUBURBAN, at "Urban Transition ", within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. Proposal: The sponsor proposes to divide 6+ acres into > 14 lots for single family dwellings and change the existing Agricultural zoning to R -1. :V: t. Q,..:�1�.:= .e�.s r.�... . -•111w .Mi:i:'..:+.ry.e�. a.s V er Y: . KA° COUNTY ROAD '- ' /CN.dUKE - , � tJ.DE -1390- AVE 4PEe1 39Oe8O j L. /99/ 8 TH ASE RIVC.R s. DC 6 HEARING AGENDA, May 24, 1984 - HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE 5 P.M. - ADJOURNMENT The Hearing Examiner Committee members usually make a site inspection, individually, or as a Committee. Contact the County Planning Department for when the Hearing Examiner Committee is going to view the sites. Environmental review of the project and project site is made and a preliminary decision regarding environmental impacts will be presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. The public hearing will afford the opportunity to present information as to whether or not a potentially SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE impact upon the physical environment will result from implementation of the proposal. The legal description and details of the project are on file and available in the Spokane County Planning Department, Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor, N. 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA (Telephone No. 456- 2205). 5 e a. ¢ = A l K l U ` �» L. i — •-r7 :..r- :.•t. t t o. yy '��Kp COUNTY ROAD PUDE -13 9® -8 � AU E AVE PE-1 3 90-8O Q PlIvERS.DC .Et. r9e. -2- STAF? REPORT May 24, 1984 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF RE: EXTENSION OF TIME for PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT NO. 1 PUDE -2 -80, Planned Unit Development, an overlay zone I. GENERAL INFORMATION Sponsor: 924 -7950 Surveyor /Engineer: 328 -5853 Northwood Properties E. 9616 Montgomery Spokane, WA 99206 -3- Daniel B. Clark W. 1808 Maxwell Spokane, WA 99201 Location: Located in Spokane Valley north and adjacent 8th Avenue approximately 300 ft. west of Felts Road; within Section 20, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM., Spokane County, Wash. Comprehensive Plan: URBAN, within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundry. History: The Hearing Examiner Committee DENIED the preliminary plat and preliminary Planned Unit Development September 30, 1980 which, was overturned at an "Appeal" to the Board of County Commissioners with Board approval on November, 1980. The Hearing Examiner Committee approved the Final Development Plan for the PUD April, 1981. Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "Extension of Time" for ESTHER'S REPLAT N0. 1 a Planned Unit Development for a zone reclassification from Agricultural to P.U.D. with MFS. The sponsor also indicates that "substantial progress" has been made toward finalizing this Preliminary Plat /PUD; as all the engineering, drafting, surveying and conditions of approval for finalizing have been met, except the road BOND has not been set. STAFF REPORT, May 24, 1984 PE- 1390 -80 ESTHER'S REPLAT NO. 1 II. SPECIAL INFORMATION The sponsor indicates the only reason the proposal has not been filed is the poor economy and slow housing market and is waiting for the market to improve. The County Planning Department in recognizing the substantial work already completed and that the proposal is in URBAN as "fill -in" development -- - that the proposal be granted another 3 year approval to allow time for hopefully an improved housing market and subsequent filing of the plat and "fill -in" development as called for by the Comprehensive Plan. The Utilities Department is recommending the new language be added regarding the ULID condition, the Coordinated Water Plan condition and dry sewers in the proposal. The County Engineer is recommending the current language for compliance with the Board of County Commissioners Resolution 80 -1592 (the County Road Standards). No other additional conditions of approval are being recommended by the remaining departments. III. CONDITIONS If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. PLANNING CONDITIONS 1. That the plat be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and /or attached sheets as noted. 2. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for three (3) years to June 1, 1987. The applicant may request a three (3) year Extension -of -Time by submitting a written request forty -five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. Such applications should demonstrate the progress made toward finalizing this preliminary plat. If an Extension - of -Time is not requested in a timely manner or said Extension is not granted, then the preliminary plat is NULL & VOID. This extension is for both the preliminary plat and the Final Development Plan of the PUD. -4- l re STAFF REPORT, May 24, 1984 PE- 1390 -80 ESTHER'S REPLAT NO. 1 III. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (cont'd) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 3. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80- 0418,Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resoluation No. 80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by said Health District. 4. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 5. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 6. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area - wide sewerage collection systems. 7. A dry sewer connection to the future area -wide Sewerage System is to be constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer connection are to be reviewed and approved by the County Utilities Department prior to filing the Final Plat. COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 8. The proposed plat (Planned Unit Development) shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees in new construction. -5- PS-1 254"C" ZS "12" 7 PT n AV E. „ 40TH • 31 32 33 33_ 94 _1 36 _ 37 _ __ 39 40 41 4 43 44 4 55TH Mar,m 4 ._... 1 .r MORAN GLENN AVE. 1:1000 37TH r � ° ' Je 0431 V£ I . m 36TH 37TH 38TH -6- fi, ,-3.? :1.9../ ..4 ^ • • , k. . . : Alt" - .f... ; 4.:‘-' • .,s.. -5...".`'W / , 3-• ,,, • Lt3e3 ..fit •I'i‘-S?" 33, ::,,;' 'p-..4. ,t*."::. 1.10ttit•t • t • '. '..i.:-.-4-$. rz . '...' ', ..".;-'",--.- ''-'' ' • ;;•:A.1 .p. ?:dietYATO BE COMPLETED (2, PHASES OR STAGES 4 : • .,e7 4 :- ; - %,,I. ; 5 e ." :■`;:::::, ..:.,‘ • t , „,..fi . . . ' 1,1,, a e :.■ ; ., '.. CHANGE-OF-CONDI ON REQUESTit - -•:-A 1, : DO 140: tE :TH I S FORM FOR' < `. 41 1 il t:-?taa., .i i;,--,:$;_;: .„.- ri -,-.•-• '7 e...f : . p it 41 • 1 3. _ m; • • . . . ,.. 3 3, r ttl..”, 1 '''' • 1 ... . ''' , ' ' 'i. .. r '•'.• ...! " ' ..7,;3. .1- J A. nnn ,,,--', aith.csoks,431-t r pc 1 a, .1 ' 0 'c cfr4 . . _ — .. _ . t .-: . fellii ii,41- . ;K: i ' :* .iV i l":' "l ' i i i :. ' . 2iir ' PRELIMINARY PLAT ,:;;•;1?-:::l7i'llir.::- -1t)-'i.:1;.1],sg1/4?..,:c1'.-;:pill'il:hittlicoui1 ,jj , ,,: . ritS- 1 .404 . ‘ . . ' - OF TIME FORMC h... ' rf .N.r. Cr :' ..a::PIANNING'DEPARTMENTm Ah... ---,- , , .., • ,.. ., • ' Sponsor Northwood Properties East 9616 Montgomery' ki • 'Address i:r• • • Zip: Spokane, WA. ' % AK...Phone NO.: 924-7950 , 7 :', ',. ' 7 ' 71 "l a phoneNO ' • 4''.14•"71f2., • . - , . II t.,. 0 ': • '' ' ' , 4 :J.' - , 4 '''■=:., '. - , '; tN .. Engineer/Surveyor: . ■ . 1 * - I; _ - • - - ..- - • 4' il4,4 7.Numberiof.lotsYfinalized Numbee:of lots ' remaining tto be finalized: 26 • a cre s Number, of 7rema ining : 2.48 ; "4.1M 1, 4'4 44 n •- ■ • Property Owner. Address: State, Zip: - 13 " ; • , , , „ • • , e . : Daniel B. Clark itTe.1:74%-rc r vd:.:dAe ' • -Address: West 1803 Maxwell"' • • ":' 7,7.,1: • 4 .74i . ::1 1 . -p City, State, Zip: Spokane, Washington 99201 •: " -c •''• 1 Phone No. ;;; PHASED PRO.JECT4...:; • • • r • •, ONLYIF.- PLAT IS BEING DEVELOPED 'AND FINALIZED:IN - 7; ieNumberEnf 14s - originally approved:7 26 . • --- nry7 . Az-ct)"1 Numb e r f phases ?linalized? to date: • 4 i i • 4 i :5/ .. • • y`..'r • , 328-5853 - --- . . '' " •:',' "' t *.* * *, * „J .... ie. , ,,,,,„ *,* * * * * * * * .* * * lc,* * *....t,*,;* . * Ice* * .* * 4......• *, * *.... ,,.. st*,. * . ';' s. ,..;. .;„,..... s . . -i ..::;',--, • ... , .'s, ':.?" N. f',4:- ' .-,...i • - ' '; - :S . i1j; ,.. ea ' ' ' el I C ' : " i 1: I .. 41. :. t .'Legal '-description of property remaining to be developed and finalif 'pil . ... ..- . , * . . .. . • .• (Please be sure that the legal .description excludes all phases that haver/tit:: -...- beetC.finalized) I TY c'h PE-1390-80; • 4? .1' .44 tt 7' ,4 ' lam' 2 of Block 1 of ESTHER'S ' ADDITION, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of ..,. •-ttt, Plats ,', page - 33; located in the Northeast quarter of Section' 20, Township;25ThNor cr.,;;; • ..e''''' }tango 44 East.- W.M.. more particularly described as follows: I •:,:r J 71 .0-'- :.w,-,•:,..ur...4,-;,: ' :•,.: - ,..-.. . - ,-.• 1 - - --. 2-t.:. 1: ;;.•;". r 1,, • „crir , .‘i, : OWilcit . 7 . ..". .c..s-.:* . . h ,, •,,,,,„ Bepinning at the -East quarter corner of said Section 20; thence West' along the East-Wet,' -Wet,' A centerline: of •'said'Section ' 20 and the centerline:of 8th't'Ayenuel.982 --„,,,, .: • „.-- • r tUtf'' North 34 West 30.00 feet to a point on the Northerly right of `way 'line .' of 8th 102 P...tel Ayenue,lEsaid;'poinO:beinathe,:. 4 • of .... 0414 Wps t 330.00 faet; thence East 327.12 feet; thence South'0°01 East: 330.00' feet to said Northerly ]'4.'''....;-.. saiNortherly right of way line; thence Westalong .-saith:Northerly,::rightftioft'way.tiline 3 -• t to the True Feint of Beginning; aLali_e__ : .. '''''.•.-: .. .., 4,11-E-L4, . .,m4,4t, .. ,. , ..• ‘,.. . ' )'.: ' -c-'k2f (=.4 - 144.':' , . S ua & n the Count of S okane State of Washin ton. '4- .=“1-7 2 .,;ih' .' 4' 4 4. 45 4 1 4 . 11 t k ' . , W - :4. - ;;Lc '.. ;t:w4a.).....,.. •eytiA. , a , . . - os,tit-,W;, • : , {4 : e• ." ' . 414.- 5 . s''' , P t t''' '' ' ' % 1 ' ''‘` . 1 '` ' t I. W tR Wt 'I I i in na 'Z -.4- , 74 , . P.I A t j 6 ! : .. . 4. * -*M( ,Iri_Se . *LL*; *4* t*....* *: i .* I "IC *it IN *i* 1*. *"7 ;V 't*S' *; /5. i -344 ll iN .33" 5:3 4 * : A, "*Y ; 4 ,',‘ -*„.,:„."..33.--CA..ros",25:1z1, „4.-,..„.. Eaf rzt-,5r. .s „rim :Th t ...'7A r.n ..;•;c„. 4 : A. ' . 1 ...... ...., 1 1:1" fi.7 r 'iv': i -.3„%.„1/ ' 8.,..„,zi14;?;::,--1.Citysl,Xi , .„., ,, #1 1 , 1Ahticip .. .k eclkidater t for. '' 'I; ';*.r.? .4 .: 11 .1e...* - ''''''. 1 ' ' i-:' ,:' ".,•;;;!' :17 q ., 1 1 ,.,„. itf t' - - -4... --sir.. .„,, .,. . ;4.4: 4,3 ,,,,,,.i tilt' ::: , f , ,- , i ..... -,:...,.,,.tp %, . 4 ,... ,4 OVER ay . - ,33 ' . ,..„. s' ge ,,,,,. ,;,:,0&, P- ...,,.. i .4 ,:; , .:;!`..4...? f'•• gFP"clads to' date ”itt•4 -•4?- y,::finalized (i.e., physical •,ifor ; 'and 441 -,-;,.447,:cossany e•-■/-ar.rsra - • . .tJCj drafting Work accomplishing -variouflepartmental requirements runtaining.ior:;-4- '4granting easements , r— ; etc I -407:9 2- zap sr 4 1:bblftx.4 • . • 6w centr...-:H;tt r-&..ttzk "Lez; • were completed but the street bon d re•yetiltoche comp 'leted. :1•Thus. substanrini -tryttre."- Att. ti PThe Final Plat was com le ty:‘ • ;t tk. 4Briefly summarize the 4041-4.! ' 4i:444 4• -4 • g the,.plati to be rit . f rif,PIFL ., pttratiagir$WriA, ' .3' - •.",j •0-744 "fl." .sret,e, .`e . . effortyand-'exPense hastibeeurundettaken to -,comp'lete Esther s F y eplatr- . , w.tttifs,r4; t. • • • 21/24 1 5 wip i•Nti3/4,; 4- • ‘' Se 1 ::!,14. ';' 4± "ta t;r14.. inpreps .4 .,,,. ' k ic: ,.itif t ft.--f!"- x..:.- .41V: a p,„.....^ rett - 4 7144 tillt. "r:i.vo II '4'3'..'icior:" -t`. 9-. 211 , 4'.. Y' W:‘1' ?"4 11 0- ., 1. 1 . • 4 , t. • •• 4 - 4 , 4 1 - qW.1 s:: ? r 'n 4Z tlf'2 , :frbt a tr A 7 ,• 1 ..,...••7 l '"`"c:0 : , ' tri 11,1, ': 4--7.1.' .-'!' • , ,• - , 'VI; :", } • , ..ot . ;t., 4 4 )re P 't •;?; n et - • • f 1.4 L • .441.; • v ar.,r*ett. • cr.` 4. i ".; •1 ,,• . • N'.-,1.17,11, 41...5A., 4. OAF,. Briefly state the reasons I.;the' plat') hasnot been finalized and/or why the platt ,t will require an Extension Time (i.e. , current or past problems, delays or v that may have; slowed progress, economic considerations ;difficulty' ir meeting , departmentalitrequirements , etc. ): : • t: • , I.: • • 71 J • :X: • P 1 4 .; The economic downturn'several years ago made the completion and build out 'of ''' ';' • r, ' t i . .;i 4 ,e <4 .t. I `4kr ‘ : , , " ' , . • i . ` ' ft; :Likbut, s tl , v., - 1 tlit this P.U.D: financially unfeasible: The market has yet to become health 't ;"' lti - ?'irfr j'16 ,-:,,,..; ::I' ' r.- r 4 • :, .yv,', 4 ,1:: , -:,7: 1 - .1, , V'Ingi ( - *ill enough to justify the immediate completion of the plat. '' : ' '' ‘' ' ---1/2-1-4 ...-.- •, reAL e 2Howe'ver7 we . expect thatwith continued economic improvement the P . U. D . 7 could Z bet ' t'e ?), • ") RECEOVE ` SEP 8 .1983 SPOKANE COUNTY DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY 'CANNING DEPARTMENT • -1- 9`l, 055 ';:'E 1694 17 4 c ) 1 44 14-s- /3.97) The undersigned, PARALEE ROBERTS, hereinafter referred to as Principal, domiciled and residing in the State of Washington, in the City of Spokane, designates the following named person as Attorney in Fact to act for the Principal. 1. Designation.. RILEY L. ROBERTS, Spokane, Washington, is designated as Attorney in Fact for the Principal. 2. Powers. The Attorney in Fact, as fiduciary, shall have • the powers of an absolute owner over the assets and liabilities of the Principal, whether located within or without the State of Wash =. ington, and also the powers provided in the Washington Trust Act, RCW Chapter 30.99. In addition, the Attorney in Fact shall have the right to ask, demand, sue for, recover, collect and receive all such sums of money, debts, dues, accounts, legacies, bequests, interest, . dividends,, annuities, and demands whatsoever as are now or shall • thereafter become due, owing, payable or belonging to the Principal; further to sell and purchase real estate upon such terms and con - ditions and under such covenants as the Attorney in Fact shall deem fit, further, to buy and sell personal property, likewise upon such terms and conditions as the Attorney in Fact shall deem fit; and fur- ther to sign, seal, execute, deliver and acknowledge deeds and any other instrument in writing of whatever kind or nature may be neces- sary or proper in the premises. The attorney in Fact shall have access to any and all safe deposit boxes held in the Principal's name. • The Attorney in Fact shall not have the power to revoke or change any estate planning or testamentary documents previously executed by the Principal unless such document or documents authorize changes with •`Court approval. 3. Purposes. The Attorney in Fact shall have discretionary powers to provide for the care,'support and maintenance of the Prin- cipal. 4. Effectiveness. This Power of Attorney shall become effective upon the disability of the Principal. Disability shall include the inability to manage her property and affairs effectively for reasons such as mental illness, mental deficiency, physical ill - . ness disability, advanced age or disappearance. Disability may • be evidenced by a written statement of a qualified physician regularly attending the Principal or by any other qualified person with know- ledge of the Principal's disabilities. 5. Duration. This Power of Attorney becomes effective as :' in Paragraph 4, and shall remain in effect to the extent : % ` '•permitted by Sections 52 and q3 of the 1974 Probate Act, RCW 11.94.010, ;,:and RCW 11.94.020, until revoked or terminated under Paragraph 6 or 7, notwithstanding any Uncertainty as to whether the Principal is 6. Revocation. This Power of Attorney may be revoked, suspended or terminated in writing by the Principal with written notice to the designated Attorney in Fact, and by recording the written instrument of revocation in the office of the Auditor of Spokane County, Washington. (a) By Appointment of Guardian; The appointment of a guardian of the estate of the Principal vests in the guardian, with Court approval, the power to revoke; suspend, or terminate this Power of Attorney. The appointment of a guardian of the person only does not empower the guardian to revoke, suspend or terminate this Power of Attorney: (b) By Death of Principal. The death of the Principal shall be deemed to revoke this Power of Attorney upon actual know- ledge or actual notice being received by the Attorney in Fact. 8. Accounting. The Attorney in Fact shall be required to account to any subsequently appointed personal representative. 9. Reliance. The designated and acting Attorney in Fact ' and all persons.dealing with the Attorney in Fact, shall he en- titled to rely upon this Power of Attorney so long as neither the 'Attorney in Fact, nor any person with whom they were dealing at the time of any act taken pursuant to this Power of Attorney, had 'received actual knowledge or actual notice of any revocation, suspension or termination of the Power of Attorney by death or • otherwise. Any action so taken, unless otherwise invalid or unenforceable, shall be binding on the heirs, devisees, legatees •or personal representatives of the Principal. 10. Indemnity. The estate of the Principal shall hold harmless and indemnify the Attorney in Fact from all liability for acts done in good faith and not in fraud of the Principal. 11. Applicable Law. The laws of the State of Washington .shall govern this Power of Attorney. 12. Execution. This. Power of Attorney is signed in triplicate on January , 1981, to become effective as provided in Paragraph 4. 7. Termination. ECEIVE _ /? A PARALEE ROBERTS SEP 8 1983 SPOKANE COUNTY 'LANNING DEPARTMEN1 -2- ',' 675 ;, E "Th93 STATE OF WASHINGTON 55. County of Spokane ) On this day personally appeared before me RILEY ROBERTS, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he ..signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the 2 uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this January, 1981. R S4-1) 8 �� h SP .14 , 44 1983 N � /NON fpgR �4 vt 655 r.SE9:696 ay of ,2.I -1. gi NOTARY pup IC ii an ot of/ /residing at`. Ei } IRIVOMM C BUS S C . : Lyle llaLcher SEP B 2 6 M 1 1 3 3 WILLIAM [. 00I000 AUOitorl 5POKANF tEI� o . pIINTY WA il; UiY E 9207 Mission Ave 99206 .t. T) FAMILY PRACTICE' DONALD L. BELKNAP. M. D. CHARLES G. MccNE!LL. M. D. 1,7 A. DECKLE. M. 0. JOHN N. DRYE. D. MURRAY A. RE ICH TON. M. D. Paralee Roberts To Whom It May Concern: Paralee Roberts is currently in a nursing home. She 4 has multiple severe physical impairments; including a leg amputation. Because of her physical disabilities, she is unable to leave the nursing home to take care of her business affairs. Yours Truly, 7 Lit , / 2 ; . e 0 Milan A.%Jeckle, M.D. MAJ /gh _UNIVERSITY MEDICAL OFFICE: 9807 'EAST 'SPRAGUE AVENUE SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99206 15091 924 -1'120 August 15, 1983 .8303e80is0 FILED 3Ri ECORDE01 REIUESTO-Lyle Hatcher SEP 8 1 126 ,, H'83 WILLIAM E. DO ,A.huE AU WTOR SPOKANE OOUNTT. WASH,.; DEPUTY E 9207 Mission Ave 99206 a S A C�LY: FOR RECORD, this date, the above order of reception. WILLIAM E. DONAHUE County Auditor Spokane County, Washington !fa It 1.4 r it• t Q 12,, i t ‘i t t :jr • SEP TS 0 0 1. 6 1. r, • Durable P of A 5 .00 FOR RECORD, this date, order of reception. rq r t t WILLIAM E. DONAHUE , County Auditor FORM I AUDITOR Spokane County Washington ri. ; Li reituA I : 0' , • .4 411/%4F4 4 IA' mi1/44f :11-21.3:1 4 4VAistesg'iiA l. C"-'" * Y0 ••= • • ittf- , #• , 4 Lsi r AUDITOR AND RECORDER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASH. Spokane, Wash. OM UN; •USINESS FONMS. SEA TO: A� v J OFFICE OF COUNTY UTILITIES DEPT. Spokane, Wash. Date: s /6 /81 ,19 FROM: C N Fc SOA. SUBJECT: Standard drainage language for the dedication on E ST 6R S ESTERS R o — /4 reelit'f O L4f 2 84( 4 es -free qd $s Y'/0 1. The owners of Lots u ,,, ,of Block and lots _,_,_, &_ of block shall be held responsible for obstructing and artifically collecting or discharging the natural or manmade drainage flow across or adjacent to their property. Pt.rr eE ON ORA /NNM&rE tP- IAA, i 2. The property owner or his representative shall inform each suceeding purchaser of all drainage easements on the property and his responsibility for maintaining drainage facilities within said easements. 3. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage courses on private lots within drainage easements or flood plain areas nor the responsibility for 'any drainage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. 4. Floors, including basement floors, shall not be constructed below elevation , USC and CS datum, within lots ,,, &, Block_, and Lots ,,, &_ block of this plat without special construction standards as required by the "National Flood Insurance Program" Title 24, Chapter X, Subchapter B; Part 1910.3 (C), paragraphs 3 and 4. AND DUI/NAM P Lam. An approved lot gradingaplan exists fortlots _ _ _ _ , Grading conform to said plan on file in the County Engineer's Office. Ai" ORA /NA6E 6. Spokane County shall not be held responsible to maintain ingress or egress across the flood plain area. . • A, ts rtat fa „ . - • ioNG/54, ' \ 2.7.2. .1% 11;1 • ; 11 — 1309. 3 Z7. a /437 P/4 otos lot No. 1206 9 /2 ti 14 •„10 it 7. 71. 7 ' I 4 .3 F; th 3 Z 7. Z NO.1925 '? N9 12 05 12. t 237 4' ■ • ` 4 3 c rb s 1 4 . 3 2 14 •nR ? 4 ..' )7 12 )3 3cc -a 2 Z3 Ii 9 tit •-; E CO NI 0 I cal AVE N2 e202 a a IC AGO M I LWA UK EE p a k ff. 0-11 sr. PAUL 80 PACI R.R.C. FOURT H 6 S4.4 17 1 6 0 .318.1e 225 o 26 Iq ,00 \f. 0 3 I ar 114, f H t a-fr, 11 3103.5 3 I S o E. o 15 n 4 1 4 a 319..51 1 11 fh '31'rtA :- (4+2..VArti4 'X 3 I H. 54 i e - 44., tees to 16 17 In Pe-ifeg-go Ptoc: uti7, r—a- I A: 'C.Alftta io 0 U 14 5 5 Ezi :=2 pn•nn - -74 4 No. 222 S Po Co eives h0) (UN J Y 1° 1 A SE1 UNIVERSITY H I GH schlopi... GROUNDS ft 22_7 2 I a 01 cc T. 229 LikE§ Ave. * Si 2137-1 /V • 3,4.1 o. /6 5 -60' 3 Z. 7. 2. F 32:7. 3 Z 7. 2 -soot P9:—?- 3 ` 1. . 300 60 300 . 360 0 2 5 er 2. 18 0 CU : co 300 t■cc /0, 23 kJ - 1844 VA1-E.) 2 J cc hoc .3 0 0 1 I I 9 UI 3o o 300 Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee Actions (Contd) 8. PN- 1401 -81, PUDN -1 -81, Location: Proposal: Action: Additional 9. PE -1390= PUDE1_8& Shenandoah Forest Park - Wieber -Final Review of PUD Planned Unit Development - An Overlay Zone In the Mead area, 1/2 mile west of Newport Highway and south of Lane Park Road 34 -27 -43 27 acres into 161 residences and 4 common areas for manufactured homes Approval - Unanimous Condition: As per Findings and Order , Esther's Replat No. 1 - Northwood Properties Planned Unit Development Location: In the Spokane Valley on 8th Avenue approximately 430 feet west of Felts Road Proposal: 2.48 acres into 26 lots and common open spaces for 26 townhouse units Action: Approval - Unanimous - Final Review of PUD Hearing adjourned: 4:40 p.m. If further information is desired, contact Steve Horobiowski or Paul Jensen at 456 -2205. SPH /dj CC: Planning Commission Mailing List A. INTRODUCTION C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1 DWIGHT HUME — Ile No. PE- 1390 -80 PUDE -2 -80 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on April 29, 1981 and the members of the Committee present being Kenneth Kennedy, Chairperson, Kathy Carstens and Jerry Williams. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Northwood Properties, C/O Dwight Hume, is requesting approval of a Final Development Plan for the Planned Unit Development, PE- 1390 -80, Esther's Replat #1, and PUDE -2 -80 for subdivision of 2.48 act es into 26 lots for townhouse units and there being present, the following applicant or repre- sentative: 1. That the existing land use in the area is undeveloped or vacant. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Urban. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural. 4: That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 7. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in, the area. 8. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use is not detrimental to the general purpose or otherwise harmfull to the public health, safety, and welfare. 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor dis- approval of the proposed use. 10. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) That the development plan meets the intent of the preliminary approval. D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTIGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS SUBDIVISION APPROVAL: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Upon the abandonment of this project as authorized by Chapter 4.20, Planned Unit Development, or upon the expiration of three (3) years from this final approval (expiration date is May 1, 1984), if not by then been completed or (commenced with an Extension of Time for completion granted), the authorization shall expire and the land and the structures thereon may be used only for a lawful purpose permissible within the zone in which the planned unit development is located. 2. That upon filing of the Final Plat the PUD Overlay Zone shall be finalized. 3. That Condition #19 of the Board of County Commissioners has been satisfied as included in Staff Analysis dated September 26, 1980. 4. That this Final PUD review as submitted satisfies County Commissioners condition #3, dated December .22, 1980 and conditions #14, #16, #18, and #20 as included in Staff Analysis dated September 26, 1930. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area- wide collection systems. 2. A dry sewer connection to the future valley sewerage system is to be constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer connection are to be . reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department prior to finalizing the PUD. E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Northwood Properties, C/O Dwight Hume for a Final Develop- ment Plan for the Planned Unit Development as described in the application should be approved. Motion by: Williams Seconded by: Carstens Vote: Unanimously to Approve (3 -0) ATTEST: WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning D' ector AP /ic. 21 t g B l By: Date: ile No. PE- 1390 -80 PUDE -2 -80 HEAR EXAMINER COMMITTEE cy Chairp \\Z-----/// 7) A a r /c.- , , r'.L/ . ( <r,)_ arson AGENDA, April 29, 1981 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Wednesday, April 29, 1981 - 1:30 P.M.(Item #2 on Afternoon Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - FINAL REVIEW PE- 1390- 80,'ESTHER'S REPLAT-NO.1 PUDE -2 -80, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT a. Location: Proposal is located in the Spokane Valley on 8th Avenue approximately 430 feet west of Felts Road. b. Legal Description: Section 20, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM That part of Tract 234, Opportunity, according to Plat recorded in Volume K, of Plats, page 20, located in the NE 1/4 of Section 20, Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Tract 234, thence N 0 °01'34 "W, along the west line of said Tract, 10.00 ft. to the true point of beginning; thence continuing N 0 °01'34 "W, 330.00 ft; th. east, 327.12 ft. to the east line of said Tract; thence S 0 °01'29 "E, along said east line, 330.00 ft; thence west 327.11 ft. to the true point of beginning. c. Sponsor: Northwood Properties % Dwight Hume E 5805 Sharp Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Surveyor /Engineer: Daniel B. Clark W 1803 Maxwell Spokane, WA. 99201 e. Site Size: 2.48 acres f. Number of Lots: 26 lots & common open spaces g. Proposed Land Use: 26 townhouse units h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: Multiple Family Suburban j. Water Source: Washington Water Power Co. k. School District: School District #356 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Septic tanks & community drainfields m. Environmental Impact: A proposed declaration of non - significance _ (a preliminary decision, which may be re- versed, that an environmental impact statement, an EIS, is not needed) has been administratively issued. This insures the applicant of a timely processing of his /her proposal at the time of the public hearing. BUT, a major purpose of the public hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the decision makers with information as to whether or not a potentially SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE impact upon the physical environment will result from implementation of the proposal, thus resulting in the need for an EIS. However, all "extensions of time" and most "change of conditions " are exempt from the provisions of SEPA; check with the Planning Department staff if uncertainty exists. - 9 -„` \ \V - c FOUPTH AVE COUNTY s. El a rriat r J Li Lsi NIXON RAVI-ROAD 3r< AVE 3 9 OTA PUDE PE I _JLLANT -LW • C aLL ja A4A/S.1 E lij AVE ivERsz. Ye EL. /9591 El LAI ROAD N2 2 3 MILWAUKEE 9TH „.11_ 1 oo 1 . LT. CC a. _.........a.....4..Tt.‘.h-..fr3 STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 29, 1981 PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT PUDE -2 -80, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FINAL PUD REVIEW I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Location 1 In the Spokane Valley north of and adjacent to 8th Avenue approximately 430 feet west of Felts Road. B. History The Hearing Examiner Committee denied the proposal on September 26, 1980. The sponsor appealed that decision to the Board of County Commissioners who upheld the appeal and with certain conditions granted preliminary approval on December 22, 1980. C. Proposal Gross property area Net Development area Number of lots Lot sizes Number of units Allowable number of units as per PUD Actual building site coverage Allowable building site coverage Paved access surface Parking spaces provided Parking spaces required Open space provided Open spaces required D. Planning Department Review 107,948 sq. ft. or 2.48 acres 86,358 sq. ft. or 1.98 acres 24 with private access 9 at 1670 sq. ft.; 15 at 1440 sq. ft. 24 units 29 units 27,541 sq. ft. or 32% 30,255 sq. ft. or 35% 21,027 sq. ft. 48 and 5 common 36 58,817 sq. ft. or 68% 56,132 sq. ft. or 65% The Planning Department has reviewed the development plan for the PUD Overlay Zone and finds that the plan meets the provisions and requirements of the PUD Ordinance and other relevant conditions concerned with this Final PUD review. These would be #19 of the Board of County Commissioners Findings and Order dated December 22, 1980 which requires final development plan review by the Hearing Examiner Committee. Also that Conditions #14, #16, #18, #20 and #22 have been satisfied. The plan has been revised from the plan originally approved by reducing the number of units from 26 to 24 units. The traffic circulation has also been redesigned to a loop system with access from 8th Avenue for one duplex unit. - 9B - ed STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 29 -1981 PE - I35' 0.'R-o ESTHER'S REPLAT - continued 2 County Engineer Review Access to 8th Avenue by units #17 and #18 is permissible as other residential units in the vicinity have direct access to 8th Avenue. The proposal as submitted appears to be in substantial conformance with their conditions-of approval. F. County Utilities Department Review Recommends two new conditions to be attached tb.the Final PUD. Each deals with provisions for double plumbing for the development. - G. County Health District Review Recommends no new conditions only those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat and PUD. II. CONDITIONS: If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. . PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Upon the abandonment of this project as authorized by Chapter 4.20, Planned Unit Development, or upon the expiration of three (3) years from this final approval (expiration date is Eeb.212 lg 1, 1984), if not by then been completed or (commenced with an Extension of Time for completion granted), the authori- zation shall expire and the land and the structures thereon may be used only for a lawful purpose permissible within the zone in which the planned unit development is located. 2. That upon filing of the Final Plat the PUD Overlay Zone shall be finalized. 3. That Condition #19 of the Board of County Commissioners has been satisfied as included in Staff Analysis dated September 26, 1980. 4. That this Final PUD review as submitted satisfies County Commissioners condition #3, dated December 22, 1980 and conditions #14, #16, #18, and #20 as included in Staff Analysis dated September 26, 1980. UTILITIES - DEPARTMENT 1. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area -wide collection systems. 2. A dry sewer connection to the future valley sewerage system is to be constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer connection are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department prior to finalizi.ig the PUD. - 9C - AGENDA, April 29, 1981 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Wednesday, April 29, 1981 - 1:30 P.M.(Item #2 on Afternoon Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - FINAL REVIEW PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT NO.1 PUDE -2 -80, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT a. Location: Proposal is located in the Spokane Valley on 8th Avenue approximately 430 feet west of Felts Road. b. Legal Description: Section 20, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM That part of Tract 234, Opportunity, according to Plat recorded in Volume K, of Plats, page 20, located in the NE 1/4 of Section 20, Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Tract 234, thence N 0 ° O1 "34 "W, along the west line of said Tract, 10.00 ft. to the true point of beginning; thence continuing N 0 ° 01'34 "W, 330.00 ft; th. east, 327.12 ft. to the east line of said Tract; thence S 0 0 01 "29 "E, along said east line, 330.00 ft; thence west 327.11 ft. to the true point of beginning. c. Sponsor: Northwood Properties % Dwight Hume E 5805 Sharp d. Surveyor /Engineer: Daniel W 99206 elB.Cla W 1803 Maxwell Spokane, WA. 99201 e. Site Size: 2.48 acres f. Number of Lots: 26 lots & common open spaces g. Proposed Land Use: 26 townhouse units h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: Multiple Family Suburban j. Water Source: Washington Water Power Co. k. School District: School District #356 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Septic tanks & community drainfields m. Environmental Impact: A proposed declaration of non - significance (a preliminary decision, which may be re- versed, that an environmental impact statement, an EIS, is not needed) has been administratively issued. This insures the applicant of a timely processing of his /her proposal at the time of the public hearing. BUT, a major purpose of the public hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the decision makers with information as to whether or not a potentially SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE impact upon the physical environment will result from implementation of the proposal, thus resulting in the need for an EIS. However, all "extensions of time" and most "change of conditions " are exempt from the provisions of SEPA; check with the Planning Department staff if uncertainty exists. - 9 '. NI XON EL.. 2010 FOURTH AVE COUNTY r•. EL. /9E 1W a W MAIN nAVE Riv ERSIO Six SEVE c e rti 10 TK A So a LV z5 PUDE- 2- so PE 1390 - 80 O C isuati i Yj NI ROAD Ns 2 3 M /LWAUKEE R.4 /LROAD 3rd LI L I II _ , 000 OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER Spokane County, Washington TO: Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee FROM: Bob McCann, Plat Inspector SUBJECT: PE 1390 Replat of Esther's Addition (PUDE 2 -80) The County Engineer has reviewed the proposed Final Plat and Planned Unit Develop- ment of the Replat of Esther's Addition. The proposal as submitted appears to be in substantial conformance with the "Conditions of Approval" set forth at the Preliminary Plat Hearing on September 30, 1980. Access to 8th Avenue by Units 17 and 18 is permissable since it is only two units and other residential units in the vicinity have direct access to 8th Avenue. BM /set TO: Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee FROM: Bob McCann, Plat Inspector SUBJECT: PE 1390 Replat of Esther's Addition (PUDE 2 -80) The County Engineer has reviewed the proposed Final Plat and Planned Unit Develop- ment of the Replat of Esther's Addition. The proposal as submitted appears to be in substantial conformance with the "Conditions of Approval" set forth at the Preliminary Plat Hearing on September 30, 1980. Access to 8th Avenue by Units 17 and 18 is permissable since it is only two units and other residential units in the vicinity have direct access to 8th Avenue. BM /set OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER Spokane County, Washington •.V nn at. 4.: THE WASHINGTON WATER POWER COMPANY ?:!i•ciriE :;rr( .'�ut:Ern1 r ;us Sereicr. P.O. BOX 3122 • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99220 A 150 289 -0500 August 8, 1980 Mr. Dan Clark West 1803 Maxwell Avenue Spokane, WA 99201 .Dear Dan: Condominium Development "C 0 P Y" This letter is to confirm the fact that Eighth and Felts Road is in The Washington Water Power Company's water district. To provide water and fire protection, it would require The Washington Water Power Company to extend its water main and the cost would past on to the developer. If there are any further 'questions regarding this matter, do not hesitate to call or write. Sincerely, Jon W. Tyler Consumer Representative JWT:wpc S E R V I N G T H E I N L A N D E M P I R E 0 1 W A S H I N G T O N A N D I D A H O EXPLANITORY TEXT of Esthers Replat PUD General Purpose The purpose of the P.U.D. overlay to this MFS zoned site is, in essance, a substitute for cluster housing and its applicable regula- tions. In lieu of "cluster ordinace" regulations, the PUD allows a demensional reduction of lot sizes to an area no larger than the neces- sary to accomodate one individual dwelling unit together with its acces- ory uses; ie. garage, courtyard and driveways. The need for this type of purchase in our Spokane market place is significant, because the buyer is still skeptical about "condo" type ownership. He'd rather own the ground and his entire building not just the interior spaces. In addition, this is categorically single - family type housing by FHA standards and thereby offers the additional buyer /lender incentives. Hence, a more efficient construction scheme is enabling the purchaser more for his money. Architecture and Other Improvements Pursuant to the PUD exhibits which area part of this application, the units will range in size from 1233 sq.ft. to 1423 sq.ft. for 2 & 3 bedroom plans. Basements will be provided and the 3 bedroom plan provides the option of on -grade total living, should the buyer be unable to easily. climb up /down stairs. There will be an association incorporated of all purchasers to establish a common procedure of maintenance of all open spaces, roads, and the outside areas of each unit. Thus, the initial landscape design and architectural harmony will be preserved. The complete package of By -Laws, Protective Covenants and Articles of Incoprporation will be prepared for staff review prior to finaliza- tion of this P.U.D. Said exhibits will assure the above maintenance and viability of this project. Total amount of land in this Subdivision:„ ,.Q, //" Acres Proposed density of the Plat:' Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: Proposes Use of controlled adjoining land: A./.7)4 .What is the driving distance n miles to the nearest fire station? Shopping facilities? 4.1X 4. Municipal Boundary: highway ezelacL.-0 ? - ,ND USE Describe any non - residential use proposed in the Plat: nol�rnt de,i ,ciu ite „„rag.", , What is the present use of the property proposed to be platted? List type of uses: Cultivated land: acres. Pasture: Timber: acres. Vacant: p, qr acres. Other: Indicate the distance from this proposal to the nearest existing water main' Indicate :,ize of nearest main. Ss - /el " inches. LANs 01.I 0 • ,- p &- /390-BaE.szrkw5/Ptk PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM Qu6t -a -80 ?S L SIGNATURE BLOCKS (ON PAGES 2 AND 3) MUST BE FILLED IN, IF APPROPRIATE, BEFORE TO THE PLAT ADMINISTRATOR. Part I - To be completed by applicant and surveyor AREA AND DISTANCE***************************** * s**************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. Total Number of Lots -' 2G Pob Lots /Gross Acre /lC Acre; /nn%'. Paved street,or: Indicate the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings ( Duplexes ( ). Indicate lots for duplexes: Multi - family dwelling units ( ). Indicate which lots: Mobile Homes ( ), Other (X' ). Describe other uses: ,Ql j„„wihrciSe re/n// c?9 o7 e t 5/efee o. .36 42,30 Acre& Is keeping of animals desired? No c>!). Yes ( ). Type: Proposed Zoning: n, o cla IMPROVEMENTS ** * * * * * * * * * ** 0 ! 63 t T?to. Do'you plan to file th Plat in its entirety as proposed, or will it be a multi - phase, deve=.; lopment? e427 rt- To what level of improvement will streets .be constructed? Gravel .(,° ) - Minimum', ^ , Curb and Gravel ('" ). Curb and Paved (..-"c.). Paved only ( ;). Describe any combinations of above: What is the time period expected for complete development of the Plat: 5' ,F/ Street improvements completed? Fat( k0 . Substantial number of lots occu ied? / // d Is dedication of any land for public use contempleted? .(Parks, schools, etc.) No. (X). Yes ( ). Describe: Indicate, the size of units proposed to be constructed: 'tt 3;3 •- /1 41' Square feet Number of Bedrooms 7.3 Estimated Sale Price 5 67 S 0 0 , Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No ( ). Yes (x). . Will any special deed / restrictions be included in the sale of lo No ( ). Yes (mac'). . If "yes ", explain: 94,4 / r n� -f ffSSa'C - Tcor�e e1- ,K G =2 7, (<n. - UTI' t, I TIES* * ****** ***** ************ * ****** ************* ***** ***** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *v Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank ). Lagoon C ). Treatment plant ( ), Other, or combinations (Describe) 1.Q: , � y ti et<Ca "egret, *410 fries Indicate the proposed source of water supply: Individual wells ( ). Publi system (x' ). Private community system ( ). Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings): Underground utility easements (7C ). Overhead utility easements Utilities in streets ( ). Nc easements ( ). - CVER- feet a 'P } L'ist a utility companies : ;"Electricity: «x44,70 '1'ACKNOWLEDGGMENTS * * * * * ** ar. PROPOSED PLAT NAME: I," the undersigned, been prepared by me County P1 SURVEYOR NOTARY SEAL: EXHIBIT A PRELIMN:ARY.PLAT_APPLICATION FORM (Continued• - UTILITIES - ( Continued)****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***** *i or districts.expected •Gas: _tment and, the laws .,. have completed the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat has ':. under my supervision ' accordance with the' requirements of;the Spokane;. the Sate of (Signed) =" ddress) ' Part III-to, be completed by Health District. Health District staff -has completed a field - investigation of'the / site - `Health :District requirements for preliminary plats have_• -(havc n t) been sat_sf e I, the undersigned,'swear undef of perjury that the above';redponsesare made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I further swear that I AM THE OWNER OF 'RECORD of the site proposed as the preliminary plat, or, if not the owner, attached here - 'with is written permission from said'owner authorizing my actions on his or.her behalf.. •:YI' also understand, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack or full-? .disclosure on my part, Spokane County may'withdraw any'declaration of non significance;71 ' it might issue in reliance upon t checklist. , ' ' • signature and title ** ******** * ** * **. ** * * ;: to provide service to this 'Plat: •; .i' Water: /.4 ieffiR Phone.: J/2-6>5 . (Signed) :� .� D.te: (Address) 7. .�n nr /4 ' Phone: o L c�l NOTARY - --t z2ar Date : ?AA *# #*** * * * * * * * * ** * *# Gu n4 6 e a leer Arty? 4, s • Part II - to be completed by water purveyor _ / ..Sarr!e io? y'ivi , This subdivision,(is) (is not) situated within our service area. We are (able) (not able) and willing to supply this subdivision with adequate water for (domestic) (fire)- (industrial) (commercial) uses. • Satisfactory arrangement (have) (have not) been made to serve this proposal. . Signature (only when items A,. 2 & C are true and completed) . ,.... • _purveyors name_ . signature •and title zip: 99'e_o -7V5 dater , - iii * # #* * #* E X H:I B I T A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * ** . * - *.* *. * *'.,* *,* •. Part IV - To be completed by County Engineers Office . County Engineers Office requirements for preliminary'plats:have - v a4.t) been satisfied subject to submission and approval of .drainage. calculations and drainage plan. Signaturei re and Title Part,V - To be completed by County Utilities Dept. County Utilities Department, requirements for preliminary pl (.6a — r knnn sa ti s f; e.i !9 Signature Signature and Title Date .* *.* *:* *;* * *.* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * This part to be completed by Planning Department' Planning Department Information Hearing. Date: 7 °' °'� Of'fV :* ;* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * . * * Date Submitted: $- /,S -8C) Preliminary Plat Fee: Date Accepted: Checklist Fee: :'. Plat File.No: / / / G-- /3%D -SO Plat Name: /4M 5 4i /ae 0/ Number of Lots: 02.(c t *1c,T1, r t e 4iDate Established : 2%4 e /a6ln` % Location: Sec. • „2J T .25 R 4,1( Advertised Zone Change: 4, ( ?" School District: COL/ dal( #.356 Checked by: Z-tadirrorhedg-e File No: PIAloc — a - 8a • Existing Zoning:. 4FS ojAin &h 4 11i(�i g . . r „I er". V/ , / J4 04 N ItI (Sal: 42... . 0 -- ' / (,: ,f.;., ii,—, 1•!--;4..,,,-:4,44-4.--1 • . , ‚I , ,1 / •••77 fj• — , ni ,i , kr 7 / / 7 7 v.7 • 1 • 2 tte4 /0 4. /22?- R6 e 32.0 112/1.2-54% i tce)va a .e - ::> g 7; . . . .... ri (I / . . r c 1 1 ‘,..-, or-ai 1 ,To.ii-it. a - : J4 -2,3o (, e 3 e.tiveir) ! e... ) /Ie x:--91,‘ 1,1 z-e . ) g? 77 4 ......_ 4?-11,././4 l,- ,:_t OA) ,• / ,is z ... , , g t, • ' — ,e• • • , / 4) I ; ! ; 1 ' ; : ttIF'•-■"1" . • • ; • • •• - • - • ;-:;• eae al• - /A": - ..4••;fl? - 7;•; . - 7 , 77 - tAm‘• • , .:0•21, 4 • :A zrIA •fc.tkx;-.P, '", it<>/o5-1 -.41.2 - 060 i L ' j /e 6c to S, " .� Ii 114 L rzr 6o Sec . assess'i' Sec,. elef - /39a"go Ahoe- 1 14S3 i (3T 232 ?A el Ti I: 7- 27 - 1 - 1 L >.1 (k rm 4 ,n 9 ) v rJrciZ 1(? /0 _TN I 'i b 763 �. C.' / • r 1 I it 11 t2 9 t A c`r "fir I4, "'� ?• / . 74� e 9 Lois 060 i L ' j /e 6c to S, " .� Ii 114 L rzr 6o Sec . assess'i' Sec,. elef - /39a"go Ahoe- 1 14S3 i (3T 232 ?A el Ti • AGENDA, September 26, 1980 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Friday, September 26, 1980 - 1:30 P.M.(Item #2 on Afternoon Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Buildingl2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT PUDE -2 -80 a. Location: Proposal is located in the Spokane Valley on 8th Avenue approximately 430 feet west of Felts Road. b. Legal Description: Section 20, Township 25N, Range 44EWM That part of Tract 234, Opportunity, according to Plat recorded in Volume K, of Plats, Page 20, located in the NE 1/4 of Section 20, Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Tract 234, thence N 0 °01'34" W, along the west line of said Tract, 10.00 ft, to the true point of beginning; thence continuing N 0 °01'34" W, 330.00 ft; th. east, 327.12 ft. to the east line of said Tract; thence S 0 °01'29 "E, along said east line, 330.00 ft; thence west 327.11 ft. to the true point of beginning. c. Sponsor: Northwood Properties E 9616 Montgomery Spokane WA.99206 d. Surveyor /Engineer: Daniel B. Clark W 1803 Maxwell Spokane, WA. 99201 e. Site Size: 2.48 acres f. Number of Lots: 26 lots & common open spaces g. Proposed Land Use: 26 townhouse units h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural . i. Proposed Zoning: Multiple Family Suburban j. Water Source: Washington Water Power Co. k. School District: School District #356 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Septic tanks and community drainfields m. Environmental Impact: A proposed declaration of non - significance (a preliminary decision, which may be reversed, that an environmental impact statement, an EIS, is not needed) has been administratively issued. This insures the applicant of a timely processing of his /her proposal at the time of the public hearing. BUT, a major purpose of the public hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the decision makers with information as to whether or not a potentially SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE impact upon the physical environment will result from implementation of the proposal, thus resulting in the need for an EIS. However, all "extensions of time" and most "change of conditions" are exempt from the provisions of SEPA; check with the Planning Department staff if uncertainty exists. - 12 - tit FOU RTH _ AVE Q Rry Eafio( W V Cr A\ k q TJ �} T AV [_ ROAD • N9 MILWAUKEE RAI 36. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No.80 -0418 the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and other agencies of jurisdiction and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and or agency with jurisdiction and issuance of permits or approval by the Health District or other regulatory agency with jurisdiction. 39. That the provisions.and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance relating to the PUD shall be complied with. 40. That an association be formed of all purchasers to establish a common procedure of maintenance of all open spaces, roads, sewage facilities and the outside areas of each unit. 41. That a complete package of by -laws, protective covenants and articles of Incorporation, if applicable, will be prepared for review by the Planning Department, Engineers Office,Health District and Prosecuting Attorney's Office prior to finalization of this PUD. 80 1551 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF PRELIMINARY' ) PLAT APPROVAL AND PLANNED UNIT ) DEVELOPMENT (AN OVERLAY ZONE) ) PE 1390 - 80, ESTHER'S REPLAT ) NUMBER 1, PUDE -2 -80, PLANNED ) UNIT DEVELOPMENT (AN OVERLAY ) .ZONE) ) FINDINGS OF FACT FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION AND CONDITIONS AIAN THIS MATTER, Being the consideration by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, hereinafter referred to as the "Board" of an appeal of Spokane County Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee Decision of September 30, 1980, denying the preliminary plat (PE- 1390-80), and Planned Unit Development.(PUDE- 2 -80), an Overlay Zone, for the Esther's Replat Number 1, hereinafter re -, ferred to as. the "Proposal ", and the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County having held a public hearing on November 10, 1980, and having fully considered all testimony presented thereat, and further having personally acquainted themselves with the site and vicinity in question, and having rendered a decision on the 10th day of November, 1980, approving said proposal, does hereby make the following: 1. 'That the proposal is located generally in the Spokane Valley on 8th Avenue approximately 430 feet west of Felts Road. 2. That . the proposal consists of 2.48 acres subdivided into approximately 26 lots for townhouse use. 3. That the'approved Spokane County Comprehensive Plan ,indicates residential usage of the area encompassed by the pro- posal. . 4. That the proposal is located in an area that is ' developing in a similar nature. 5. .:That the - proposal is compatible with existing uses in the area. 6.. ' That the proposal is not detrimental or otherwise harmful to the public health,. safety and welfare. 7. That the applicant has demonstrated changed conditions since the ori.ginal zone change warranting•a zone change from Ag- . ricultural to Multiple Family Suburban and the PU -D Overlay Zone. 80 1554 ,FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION AND CONDITIONS PE- 1390 -80 2 8. That the proposal is not toally inconsistent with the ' surrounding land use classifications and does not grant a special privilege or rights to the 'applicant different than those enjoyed by adjacent property owners. 9. That the Board finds that the proposal is located within the recorded water service area of Washington Water Power Company and that the District indicates there is an adequate system capacity, and that they are desirous of serving the proposal for domestic, fire and irrigation purposes.. 10. That the proposal is situated within the recorded fire service area of Fire. District H1. 11. That the proposal lies within the boundaries of Central • Valley School District. 12. That there are no unique environmental features in the area encompassed by the.proposal. 13. That there are no cultural resources identified in the area subject to the 14. That after considering all testimony at the public hearing held by the Board and reviewing our environmental documents prepared and submitted for the proposal, the Board concurs in the Declaration of Non - Significance. 15. That the . proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County have been met. 16. That the Board of County Commissioners found this project to be consistent with the purpose of the Planned Unit Development as set forth in Section 4.17.010 (A) or (8). 17. That on the 10th day of November, 1980, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County at a regular meeting did approve the proposal based upon the testimony submitted at the public hearing and other evidence available to the Board to uphold the appeal of Northwest Properties and overruled the denial of the Hearing Examiner Committee.. From the foregoing Findings, the Board hereby in approving the proposal does make the following conditions: 1. That the conditions set forth in the Spokane County Hearing Examiner staff analysis dated September 26, 1980 on pages 12D through 12G are hereby adopted as conditions of approval subject to the following amendments: 80 iri FINDIN - GS OF 'FAG), DECISION AND CONDITIONS 1. Amend item N1i to read as follows: That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to January 1', 1982. 2, Amend item 1136 to read as follows: Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution d8O -0418 the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and other agencies of jurisdiction and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and /or agency with jurisdiction and issuance of permits or approval by the Health District or other regulatory agency with jurisdiction. 3. That the provisions and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance relating to the PUD shall be complied with. 4. That an association be formed of all purchasers to establish a common procedure of maintenance of all open spaces, roads, sewage facilities and the outside areas of each unit. • DATED THIS DAY OF ATTEST: VERNON W. OHLAND Cler of the Board By i►i �! "/ i/ �� w� Depu y DEC 2 21980 19 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, PE- 1390 -80 3, - ni c e - S .~t"' 30 118 P E \3`1O - Reptc E sit e 's Add . •Puo G a- 80 re\irn■nav 9k1/4±- E U528 - 7 . 9' smete' Is 411• is i s t? e to e U.t. o g- .67 a o-� eropo se 6, etc. e.4 -1 _e cv_S j cep etyu 'eawiec /den /74 ,D1sien/cr . C'o yr4- ® P - Z -rte i-e-e ._ uA) - - c C eQQ , D �s i _am a_4J tuniL Vie.,,, -tom -zt Ka-- eLAQ V k . ;; a Q a. wcc+a-e wt It wpm Approve 455,0 11b11 tr. -- i - rove l l rn) GS Loa - Pt. 1` Za 4 74.E /7x P's % R Yy�- � d ortaLaO72 7 ,2aw_S 1- ;vco2f ?' OR 3el . Vr q r � a n for r s «� _z . c - tau° pe . — eP editad c a pi) r-ov -cs 4 M et -a _ a .� - Cp r24.e. t icit-freat ee . e -r-z-ef �2 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER. CONCERNING'.: PRELIMINARY. :: .) SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP- ) MENT, PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT ) NO. 1 PUDE -2 -80 ). SPONSOR: NORTHWOOD PROPERTIES ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Dwight J. Hume,representing Northwood Properties, Inc., has filed a Notice of Appeal of the denial by the Hearing Examiner Committee of the above captioned Preliminary Subdivision and Planned Unit Development. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will hold a public hearing at 1:30 P.M. ON NOVEMBER 10, 1980, at its office in the County Courthouse to consider the above - mentioned preliminary subdivision and planned unit development on the following described property: a. Location: Proposal is located in the Spokane Valley on 8th Avenue approximately 430 feet west of Felts Road. b. Legal Description: Section 20, Township 25N, Range 44EWM That part of Tract 234, Opportunity, according to Plat recorded in Volume K, of Plats, Page 20, located in the NE 1/4 of Section 20, Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Tract 234, thence N 0 °01'34" W, along the west line of said Tract, 10.00 ft; to the true point of beginning; thence continuing N 0 °01'34" W, 330.00 ft; th. east, 327.12 ft. to the east line of said Tract; thence S 0 °01'29 "E, along said east line, 330.00 ft; thence west 327.11 ft. to the true point of beginning. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony in support of or in opposition to the appeal on said matter filed with the Board of County Commissioners. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 6 day of October, 1980. Publish: Valley Herald October 15, 1980 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING VERNON W. OHLAND CLERK OF THE BOARD by 21�,ek o rma L. Smith, Deputy Clerk John Culler and Kenneth Kennedy. SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER DWIGHT HUME 1 A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on September 30, 1980 and the members of the Committee present being Ted McCoury Chairperson, l File No. PE- 1390 -80 PUDE -2 -80 B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Northwood Properties, is requesting approval of a preliminary plat Planned Unit Development PE- 1390 -80, Esther's Replat No. 1 for subdivision of 2.48 acres into 26 lots for townhouse units and there' being present, the following applicant or representative: C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is undeveloped or vacant. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as residential usage. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural with a request for Multiple Family Suburban on a previous preliminary plat.. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. Fl le No. PE- 1390 -80 PUDE -2 -80 6. That the land in this area is unsuitable for the proposed PUD within the proposed Zone Classification. 7. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use is not detrimental to the general purpose or otherwise harmful) to the public health, safety, and welfare. 8. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed 'neither approval nor disapproval of the proposed use. 9 The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) That the proposal as submitted does not comply with the Purpose of Planned Unit Development (section 4.20.010) of the Spokane County Zoning Ordiance as it relates to special features of geography, topography, size or shape and does not result in a more efficient, aesthetic and desirable environment in harmony with that of the surrounding area.. D. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Northwood Properties for a preliminary plat Planned Unit Development Esther's Replat No. 1 as described in the application should be denied. 2 Motion by: Kennedy Vote: 2-1 to deny ATTEST: WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Director By: 1st' /!j V':)h'Czz1t. Date: S. ti \ j(' ( o J 1 3 File No. PE- 1390 -80 PUDE-2 -80 Seconded by: Culler • HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE AGENDA, September 26, 1980 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Friday, September 26, 1980 - 1:30 P.M.(Item #2 on Afternoon Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PE- 1390 -80, ESTHER'S REPLAT NO. 1 PUDE -2 -80 a. Location: Proposal is located in the Spokane Valley on 8th Avenue approximately 430 feet west of Felts Road. b. Legal Description: Section 20, Township 25N, Range 44EWM That part of Tract 234, Opportunity, according to Plat recorded in Volume K, of Plats, Page 20, located in the NE 1/4 of Section 20, Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Tract 234, thence N 0 °01'34" W, along the west line of said Tract, 10.00 ft, to the true point of beginning; thence continuing N 0 °01'34" W, 330.00 ft;'th. east, 327.12 ft. to the east line of said Tract; thence S 0 °01'29 "E, along said east line, 330.00 ft; thence west 327.11 ft. to the true point of beginning. c. Sponsor: Northwood Properties E 9616 Montgomery Spokane, WA.99206 d. Surveyor /Engineer: Daniel B. Clark W 1803 Maxwell Spokane, WA. 99201 e. Site Size: 2.48 acres f. Number of Lots: 26 lots & common open spaces g. Proposed Land Use: 26 townhouse units h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: Multiple Family Suburban j. Water Source: Washington Water Power Co. k. School District: School District 1356 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Septic tanks and community drainfields m. Environmental Impact: A proposed declaration of non - significance (a preliminary decision, which may be reversed, that an environmental impact statement, an EIS, is not needed) has been administratively issued. This insures the applicant of a timely processing of his /her proposal at the time of the public hearing, BUT, a major purpose of the public hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the decision makers with information as to whether or not a potentially SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE impact upon the physical environment will result from implementation of the proposal, thus resulting in the need for an EIS. However, all "extensions of time" and most "change of conditions" are exempt from the provisions of SEPA; check with the Planning Department staff if uncertainty exists. - 12 - NI XON MILWAUKEE RAI: } STAFF ANALYSIS PE- 1390 -80, PUDE -2 -80, A. Location - September 26, 1980 ESTHERS REPLAT N0.1 ESTHERS REPLAT N0.1 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPEMENT I. GENERAL INFORMATION The proposal is located in the Spokane Valley, more specifically, lying north of Eighth Avenue approximately 430 feet west of Felts Road. B. History This PUD application was a part of a two lot subdivision known as Esther's Addition, PE- 1328 -79. Esther's Addition was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on September 27, 1979. One lot with its existing single family residence was to remain zoned Agriculture. The second lot was approved for Multiple Family use and is before the Committee requesting a PUD. (Note: Esther's Addition is also scheduled for a Time Extension on this agenda.) Therefore, the application requires two (2) actions by the Hearing Examiner Committee; (1.) a PUD decision and (2). a preliminary plat decision allowing for the creation of the lots within the PUD. C. Proposal Gross property size - Net property size Number of lots - Lot size Actual building site coverage Allowable building site coverage Paved access surfaces - Parking spaces required - Parking spaces provided Open space required Open space provided D. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan The approved map of the Comprehensive Plan indicates residential usage of this area, as well as all nearby surrounding lands, with no density designation. E. Land Use Analysis: 1. Existing Land Uses The proposed site is currently undeveloped or vacant. North -- single family, varied lot sizes and i mile north is University City shopping center. East -- Vacant parcels and scattered single family residences and duplexes on varied lot sizes, varied uses are found including: stables, nursing home and 12 unit apartment house. South -- predominately single family uses along with University High School, a nursing home and seven, 6 -unit apartment houses. West -- mixture of vacant undeveloped land, along with single family dwellings, duplexes, a mobile home court and commercial uses along Dishman -Mica Road. - 12B - 107,910 sq. ft. or 2.48 acres 86,328 sq. ft. or 1.98 acres 26 with private access (19) @ 1,440 sq. ft and (7) @ 1,670 sq.ft 26.6% or 22,984 sq. ft. 35.0% 25,182 sq. ft. or 23.3 % 39 spaces 82 spaces 65% or 56,113 sq. ft 73.3% or 63,344 sq. ft. STAFF ANALYSIS - Septembe. _6, 1980 PE- 1390-,.- continued PUDE -2 -80 2. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses The Multiple Family zoning has been approved and will become final upon filing of Esther's Addition, PE- 1328 -79. The sponsor is requesting the PUD concept which would allow the selling of the town houses along with its associated parcel of land. The staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the project generally complies with the PUD requirements and has recommended certain conditions to assure compliance. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION A. Circulation The County Road Engineer has examined the proposed preliminary plat and indicated that private road easements be 30 feet minimum with paved surfaces and a design speed of 20 mph. Additional recommendations are included in the Staff Analysis. B. Sewage Disposal C. Drainage D. Water Supply The District advises the staff that their part to serve, exists for the irrigation uses. E. Fire Protection F. Schools 12C - The Health District has authorized the use of individual on -site sewag, . disposal systems and requests the opportunity to comment on the proposal at the public hearing. Final construction plans for drainage control should be reviewed and approved by both the County Engineer and Health District prior to the final plat filing. The proposal is located within the recorded service area of the Washington Water Power Company. adequate system capacity, and a desire on provision of water for domestic, fire and The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Spokane County Fire Protection District /1. The Fire District staff requests that the Hearing Examiner Committee require mains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire protection as a condition of final plat approval. The District also requests that they be allowed to review and approve final fire flows and water plans. Proposal lies within the boundaries of Central Valley School District X1356. STAFF ANALYSIS - September...,, 1980 PE- 1390 -8U- - continued PUDE -2 -80 G. Unique Environmental Features None have been identified. H. Cultural Resources None have been identified. I. Agricultural Suitablility III. ZONING ANALYSIS The Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service has committed the site to urban uses. The property will be zoned Multiple Family Suburban upon the filing of Esthers' Addition PE- 1328 -79. The sponsor is reqesting the PUD concept for this property to allow for flexibility in design. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and has been reviewed by the Planning staff. No significant adverse environmental impacts were judged to exist. Slight adverse environmental impacts were identified on the checklist in the, following categories: earth; air; water; flora; fauna; noise; light and glare; land use; population; housing; transportation /circulation; public services; utilities; and energy. The Planning Director issued a proposed Declaration of Non- Significance, and it was circulated to other agencies of jurisdiction. V. CONDITIONS: If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. PLANNING CONDITIONS 3 1. That the plat be designated as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and /or attached sheets as noted. 2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one dwelling structure be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. 3. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) 4. That appropriate street names be indicated. - 12D - STAFF ANALYSIS - September ..6, 1980 PE- 1390 -6..- continued PUDE -2 -80 5. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 6. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the filing of the final plat. 7. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the physical environment; a finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of the project;. and a final declaration of non - significance is hereby to be issued. 8. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 9. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolution 1177 -1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements. 10. There will be no phasing of the project, and the plat will be finalized in its entirety. 11. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to October 1, 1982, a time extension public hearing before the Hearing Examiner Committee may be required after one year if new conditions are recommended because of an administrative review by agencies of jurisdiction. The project sponsor is responsible for requesting an Extension of Time prior to October 1, 1982. 12. That the Hearing Examiner Committee sustain the issuance of a proposed Declaration of Non - Significance and recommends issuance of a final Declaration of Non- Significance. 13. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. 14. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Subdivison Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The orginial intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 15. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. - 12E - STAFF ANALYSIS - September , 1980 PE- 1390 -8, continued PUDE -2 -80 5 16. A five (5) foot sight- obscuring fence shall be provided along the west and east boundaries of this proposal to provide a buffer for the existing adjacent residential uses. 17. That access to and from the north of the site be prohibited except for the existing residence. 18. That the final development plan indicate requirements for yard setbacks as set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance for PUD's. 19. The sponsor shall within one (1) year of the date of prelimimnary approval submit a final development plan of the proposal development for review by the Hearing Examiner Committee. In the event that this PUD is not finalized the preliminary approval of Esthers replat No. 1, PE- 1390 -80, shall become null and void. 20. That the open space provisions of the Zoning Ordinance for PUD's be complied with in the development of the site. 21. That conditions, covenants and restrictions be submitted by the sponsor for review and approval of the Planning Department Engineers Office and the Prosecuting Attorneys Office prior to finalization of the PUD. 22. That prior to finalization of PUDE 2 -80, and PE- 1390 -80 Esthers Replat No. 1, the preliminary plat of Esthers' Addition, PE- 1328 -79 shall be finalized. 23. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of Esthers' Addition PE- 1328 -79 shall apply to this proposal. ENGINEER CONDITIONS 24. That plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 25. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the C;:unty Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 26. Existing County roads providing access to the plat shall be paved and /or curbed to the standards of the County Engineer; curbed on plat side of road. 27. That sidewalks are required along the arterial(s) on Eighth Ave. 28. Public Road Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section: Section Number 1 For Eighth Avenue Minimum Paving width Secondary Arterial. 29. Proposed private road(s) serving 26 lots with: ) no extension possible4 D61E76 i7 12F 6 STAFF ANALYSIS - September z6, 1980 PE- 1390 -8u- continued PUDE-2 -80 30. That private road(s) be improved to standards adopted by the Board of County Commissioners; 30 feet minimum easement width; Paved standard minimum improvement width. 31. That the following statement be placed in the plat dedication: WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain, or otherwise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct alter, repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. 32. Prior to Finalization of the P.U.D. the articles of incorporation by -laws or other similar documents which establish a homeowners association or like corporation and set forth responsibility and duties; shall be submitted to the County Engineer for review and comment. • 33. A detailed on -site surface water disposal plan for the entire project shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District Prior to the issuance of any building permits. Drainage Plans for both site development and roads shall4 a p`Y 08 Water Quality Study recommendations. 1);4411100 a 6N �^" G°U4°6mwnc . Desig speed for private roads shall be 20 mph. UTILITY CONDITIONS 36. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County °�k Health Districtiand is further conditioned and subject to specific application s � \6' t ?� ,0 P approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. Q er nvvrooa 64 a,9 c. Iles e4 jur i C U CA" uv+. b ut 37. The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW, Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. 38. Any water service for this project shall be provided by �7Shlr (Sy1a 42/ Q y es i Company in accordance with the coordinated water system plan for Spokane County. 12G_- TO: PLANNING DEPANFMENT FROM: COUNTY ENGINEER DEPAR1MENT Q T M SUBJECT: ROAD CoND)ToNS FOR PLAT RnpraT ok Let * 2 o4 4srhafZ Rep /.o * CONDITIONS LIRCLED APPLY TO PLAT UNDER CONSIDERATION PE /390- no P e e o E I -that conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer Is given subject to dedication of Right -of -Way and approval of the road system as Indicated In the preliminary plat of record: • that plans profiles, and cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer tor epprovel prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer, that drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or .the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a Ilcensed Professional Civil Engineer. E 4 -that the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat Is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. E 5- construction wlthln the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of 0 Ilcensed engineer /surveyor, who•shall furnish the County 'Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate In writing that all improve- ments were Installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced; • E 6 -no construction work Is to be performed wlthln the existing or proposed Public Right of Way until a permit has been Issued by the County Engineer. All work Is subject to Inspection and approval by the County Engineer; E 7 -all construction within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way Is to be com- pleted prior to tiling the final plat or a bond In the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of Improvements construction certlfiea- tlon "As Built" plans, and monumentlny the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer; E 8-no direct access from lots to 1/2 Right of Ways until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads; E 9 -no direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads; EIO -road design, construction, and drainage control for 1/2 Right of Ways and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the Developer; E -11 -that appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held In trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1 ft. strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Tem- porary Cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) E12 -that Individual driveway access permits be required prior to Issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. E13- dedication of addltlonal Right of Way along additional Right of Way along additional Right of Way along E14-no direct access be allowed from lots lo EIS -that a statement be placed. In the plat dedication providing for future slope ease- ments as required by Spokane County along -existing County roads providing 4+mme -t access to the plat shall be paved and /or curbed to the standards of the County Engineer; curbed on plat side of road. Ell-that all public roads within the plat bo curbed and /or paved to the• %specifications of the County Engineer; that sidewalks are required along the arterlal(s) on 6itTh Ave.. , Public Road Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section StwG.+tta/N.2�/ �Rl4 / ST q (1) Section Number / For ` v7a/,7l 4y& Mlnlmum Paving width (2) Section Number For cY Minimum Paving width (3) Section Number For - Minimum Paving v dth (4) Section Number For Minimum Paving width E20 -that the.owner, his grantees and assigns agree to participate In and not oppose or protest . a future Road Improvement to satisfy the requirements of District d the t y or County n lI Coun paving policy. curbng i ns toe ayal of water paving and/or i E21 -that the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal acceptable to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway- County Road Intersection. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the responsibility of the Sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to ss determined by the' County Engineer and the State Highway Department. Engineer In the amount en t proposed pr Ivato road(s) sorviny Dale lots wl the X no extension possible; ex - tension to serve 8 ur Ioss lots; ______luture publ l c'Klght of Way tract; 1.23 that private r gj(sl bu Improved lo standards adopted by the Bool.d of County Commis - Stoners; , I ml u Imuni easemuu wIdtit pp qq��//��zz(( S vi fed minimum Improvement w idth. . tij - od toThgiir' oval under Section IO.214 p pane County Fire Code. that the tullowlny'statement he placed In the plat dedication: WARNING: Spokane County has no rut, pun:,ib ll l t y 10 build, lr sve l iceintaine or w lsu Service the private road:. Luntaluod within or described In this plat. Ity dcLopllny this plat or subsequently by allowing a building pormll to be Issued on pi uporty on a private rood, Spokane County assumes no obligation tar said private rand and ihu owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obl lyntlon of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair Imp, ovo, maintain provide drainage or snow removal on a ( private fond. lid:, 1uqulr umunl is and shall run with the land and shall be binding n eon thv ogee' thy(' belt' o.c urr vnfu o re •t S tinS ln the tl l p e.tb n . obl( to partl OS y bete In The r of I ...---. • OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON SspTiwria 3 , 19 to E ti E E G ow.m?d)Z'• Aw>� b u:%\ s t n- �lewwiY3 , DEbigti? Syeeck, Cron Ta►qA'TE RoAdS Shoth be 20 mph. TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: COUNTY ENGINEERS DEPARTMENT Q T M SUBJECT: ROAD CONDITIONS` FOR km- RQgtOT oh LA' a 2 CONDITIONS CIRCLED APPLY TO PLAT UNDER CONSIDERATION PE /390 — 815 ((77 u e O E 1 -that conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer is given subject to dedlcatlon of Right -of -Way and approval of the road system as Indicated In the preliminary plat of record. that plans profiles, and cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer tor Approval paed under the construction and/or faensedtProtessionali , puns to be that drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a 1)censed Professional Civil Eng lneer. 4-that the regulations of the National Flood. Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plot is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. E 5- construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who'shall furnish the County "Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate In writing that 011 improve- ments were Installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced; E 6 - construction work Is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way until a permit has been Issued by the County Engineer. All work Is subject to Inspection and approval by the County Engineer; E 7 -all constructlr;e within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way Is to be com- pleted prior to filing the final plot or a bond In the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of Improvements construction certlflca- tion "As Built" plans, and monumentlny the street centerlines shall be flied with the County Engineer; E 8-no direct access from lots to I/2 Right of Ways until such roads are constructed to County $tandards and established as County Roads; E 9 - direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads; E10 -road design, constructlon,.and drainage control for 1/2 Right of Ways and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the Developer; E appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held In trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded; A I ft. strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Tem- por0ry,cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) Public Road (I) Section (2) Section (3) Section (4) Section JFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY; WASHINGTON Sertirmbe e B 19 9'e 04 4STh&K Rep MT E12 -that Individual driveway access permits be required prior to Issuance of a bulld ing permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. E13-dedication ot addltlonal Right of Way along addltlonal Right of Way along addltlonal Right of Way along 114 -no direct access be allowed from lots to 115 -that a statement be placed In the plat dedication providing tor future slope ease- ments as required by Spokane County along existing County roads providing 4lrest access to the plat shall be paved and /or curbed to the standards of the County Engineer; curbed on plat side of road. 117-that all public roads within the plat be curbed and /or paved to the:speclfIcatlons the County that sidewalks are required along the arterial(s) on Ei2ktt, AJP. , of Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section Number / For E/ h77, fiNE Minimum Paving width Sereytdnmy filic%v!/4 /STp Number For 'J Minimum Paving width Number — For Minimum Paving r dth Number For Minimum Paving width 120 -that the owner, his grantees and' assigns agree to participate In and not oppose or protest .0 future Road Imp room satis the requirements ay ments of the Y n �II Count paving policy. curbi nAst necessarye for rescinded necessary disposal uu of g storm water determines rff�d� paying and /or g 121 -that the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal acceptable to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway- County Road Intersection. State Highway Department approval of' the proposed design must be received prlor'to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the responsibility of the Sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond as determined by thi Countym `{ Engineer and fur the nished State o Highway Count Departmenter In the e amount ver the proposed ( tl1 J 2l0 ex- tension to B _future public RIght of Way tract; that private r g,yl(s) he Improved to tandards adopted by-the Hoop] olmCo County ltrCom slonur:.�g Q minimum easement width �pO S T ane - / County Fire Code. width. stoners; to approval under Section 10.20 t ? E24 that lire following 'statement be pieced In the plat dedication; WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build Improve, maintain, or other - ' wise service' the private reeds contained .wIlhln or providing service to the property .described In this plot. Hy mccoplinp this plat -or subsequently by allowing a building permit to bo Issued -on property on a private rood, Spokane County assumes no obl lgetion for said private rued end the owners, hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation ot any hind or nature whotsoovor to establish, examine, survey, constrect, alter, repair, Improve, maintain provide drainage or snow removal on a -pr l va to cone. 1(11, requirement is end shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owqner, their heirs �., ce: or d'slns In i t . ire li ) obligation to parTl c pate In trio n�., a undo r,e n) J ,rlva rood as provide r (OVER) ■ e L' G o an Q NT. SStt.ANce. ()Sr tI► „j b u't \ A : rt. A - eswift's _*ate •ae n ' r JEwe l� T?p.[.n %nnnt�nc& AN - o'nS bA3t3 .creek Vora ,D21/ATE ROAd$ Shall be 20 mph. get Ot a - err 5171xe BS L_tt PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM ALL SIGNATURE BLOCKS (ON PAGES 2 AND 3) MUST BE FILLED IN, IF APPROPRIATE, BEFORE RETURNING,; TO°THE PLAT ADMINISTRATOR. Part I - To be completed by applicant and surveyor AREA AND DISTANCE*t******************************* * * * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * * * *w *** *w* Total amount of land in this Subdivision: „Q. -Y Acres • Proposed density of the Plat: 70044/2 (Pe/ ' •Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: Proposes Use of controlled adjoining land: /7/4 • What is the driving distance } n miles to the nearest fire station? 7 -Shopping facilities? 2 . Municipal Boundary* 3 highway ae*ace..1 t ? Total Number of Lots LAND USE**********$************************************************ * * * * * * ** ** * * * * * * * * ** ** ** * *** *• Indicate - the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings ( )• Duplexes ( ). Indicate lots for duplexes: Multi- family dwelling units ( ). Indicate which lots: Mobile.Homes (• ). Other (X' ). Describe other uses: ,Ol TnJi,2,%tc (ci .Describe any non-residential use p in the Plat: Cnl � v€ oy i 794e9 . no j4e% egen,- C .tK. yGCO . Whatis the present use of the property proposed to be platted? - ''List type of uses: Cultivated land: °'rte. acres. Pasture: acres "' '' .: . Timber: • acres, -Vacant: ', « - acres. Other: 'I ' Acres' s keeping of animals. desired? No (X). Yes ( ). Type: roQbsed 1 s * * 9 . �o el�,4 , '64 r « ' ' 4 OcP' t ?b-o. * • -Do you plan. to file th Plat in its entirety as proposed, or will it be a multi- ph,se lopmexit? , To what level of improvement will streets be constructed? Gravel ( ) - Curb•and Gravel ( ). Curb and Paved (-'c ). Paved only ( ). Describe any combinations of above: What is the'time period expected for complete development of the Plat: !' Street'improvements completed? Fee . Substantial number of lots occu ied? fie/ 621 Is dedication of any land for public use contempleted? (Parks, schools, etc.) .No.. ( ). Yes ( ). Describe: •Indicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: le-33 ra •- /fro is Number of bedrooms .- 3 • Estimated Sale Price Paved street "or? • S-S-`— 6 `l S h A . Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No ( ). Yes (x). Will any special deed restrictions be included in the sale of tots? No ( ).. Yes (-NC - ). If "yes ", explain: Sarni 'n '3�1 H o i'c'y - rcvr�e.« /PcF etv,oe UTI ITIES*****************************.*************** * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * ** Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal* Septic tank (-C ). Lagoon ( Treatment plant ( ). Other, or combinations (Describe) Lots /Gross Acre`" Wart -c __ Acres • Square feet Indicate the proposed source of water supply: Individual wells ( ). Public system (x' ). Private community system ( ). Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings): Underground utility easements (7' ). Overhead utility easements ( Utilities in streets ( ). Nc easements ( ), Indicate the distance from this proposal to the nearest existing water :Hain' A. Indicate- :,rze of nearest main: `75 /cr inches. -OVER- feet ti PROPOSED PLAT-NAME: I, the undersigned, `'been prepared by me `County P1 A. B. C. (Signed) , ddress) signature and title E X H I B I T A PRELIMINARY. PLAT.APPLICATION FORM (Continued) Pa ge 2 . UTILITIES'- ( Continued)+ w + rtww++ rt+ rt+ ****** w+w w++******.*..*.w+ w +rt +rtrw + +s + + +rt + +w + + + ********* h ,List'utility companies or districts expected to provide service to this Plat: Phone: ,(/2 ,;;Electricity: 1 / , . •Gas: 53 2 L ! l� /2� j� Water: 4( � L ) AcK NOWLEDGMFNTS +wrww ** ****w +s+w+ + ***** ++ w r + +*** ** **** *** + +w + + +* ** ** *r +++ +rtr ++ + * ** i * awi' have completed the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat hae'. under my'supervision ' accordance with the' requirements of the' Spokane` tment and the laws the � e of �ash}ngtin. Aci r /a • .,_ Date: Phone: Zip: I, the. under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are..:: truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I further swear that I AM THE OWNER. OF `;RECORD of'the site proposed as the preliminary plat, or, if not the owner, attached here -'' ,:,with is written permission from said'owner authorizing my actions on his or her behalf..;. .: I also understand, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack or full`' =•disclosure• "on my part, Spokane'County may withdraw any declaration of non significance,,,, „that it might issue in reliance upon t j checklist. (Signed) (Address) �2//� � , � phone: `� � ,) 6-1- Zip: NOTARY " 27nn -& . ` La -y,r- Date: Dte: » '* * s** * ***ww * ** * *** ** w **** *rt *rt * * * * * * *** * * ** rt r * * *w * * * * * ***w* * * + ++ + * + + * * +wrt • sr Part II - to be completed by water purveyor • This subdivision (is) (is not) situated within our service area. We are (able) (not able) and willing to supply this subdivisi ,.ri +r, (domestic) (fire) (industrial) (commercial) uses. Satisfactory arrangement'(have) (have not) been made to serve this proposal. Signature (only when items A,. B & Cure true and completed) '7 adequate water fo • purveyors name signature •and title '1Part III -to be completed by Health District Health District staff has completed a field investigation of the site. Health District requirements for preliminary plats have (have not) been satisfied. Signature rYal Page 3 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *,* * Part IV - To be completed by County Engineers Office A. County Engineers Office requirements for preliminary plats have (.ere a44) been satisfied subject to submission and approval of drainage, 3 ' calculations .and drainage plan. Signature * * * *.* * * * * * * * * * * E X H I B I T A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) o g/ /S/ SC Date * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Part.V - To be completed by County Utilities Dept. County Utilities Department requirements for preliminary pl (hr:e�+te4i been satisfied, . •Signature . 4- Signature and T!tle Hearing Date: 8/474 Date * *•* ** *,* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * This part to be completed by Planning Department Planning Department Information Date Submitted: Preliminary Plat Fee: Date Accepted: Checklist Fee: Plat File No: Zone Change File No: Plat Name: Existing Zoning: Number of Lots: Date Established: Location Sec. T R Advertised Zone Change: School District: Checked by: ADAMS, BENTHIN & CLARK, INC. W. 1803 Maxwell SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99201 Phone 328-5853 JOB C5tners Ye P IgI- 1 R. Rai' At SHEET NO CALCULATED BY OF DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALr 2. Water keA Circa'. i,\ Q. b '12 or Lower 'Al req Qver+lo = 0$O s se -lo f C�skef3 DNe_ "I"o oO _sal I coHd'liars \n Se I (2.ra &%terrheo.1 ! tre; M a a .. "207 s Area T erry ouS Skrfaces el-TO s ro o{ j_. Pa.% ). t I I .ft - hit ; - .. F r _ /2- Pre 4a I raL1 e'` • a ,r t Ag II, /$ / ..-8n t: _L,aW eo ��f l Pro�Ide�l = 1300 raft 6 0-s 0.4÷", Pres.;P, +a iav1 Z e.. . .. Y . _ . ( SOU li + ti_ P ± of a a $ f Weeol Tz2o /$ = _1.090 t rce; cfNAc4 Provided = . /306 5? -',1"F". CI �� I a-f�o Dr we( v15 t o =_Os9 ifs .See Slieef Use 1 e lY e ° ep. - fin cl Inv' wel� 017 3 1n/ a�¢r4e _ /Tree L.. .3 . ADAMS, BENTHIN & CLARK. INC. W. 1803 Maxwell SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99201 Phone 328•5853 „ 20r” \ / . re?k ....._._ W «te S- VN_2: rV ' S A . 122 �� Area `r OE ._ ell » = 012. cfs (tee SGneef S) V,re .. _ 1 . xtro . o�ep ±h. o� r 1el/ ....... ...... ...: M q : �. ' 20 w ;_ Nees; 3 d7 rm °T f rN no I I -' � i h2r� Pe SHEET NO ` . Cr r, CALCULATED BV a 1 ne D.-= SAWS/ cr CHECKED BY OA SCALE JOB 6'9-7,0 s roo ._.__. ts7so 5, vi .. -- /Z z3O s1± 1 W( v O s Lawn ! ,4✓eo 17 sa.fT (sew 5,eet 6 J • Iw..er�iol s �r aces — ZI6) so . -% no66- aR � t lso. Pav'J ( !� 0 1au;n r roof _ 6 ae��low �yL llr, q c>!E1 ( � ts ... ro ' d7we prov,c�eo' . �}ov✓eiki �,e + - e • T 4s -.r: t:,n- preS lrt ru rdT 1rc.,A WWTer , ftr& /.s t. 3310 - �iq -10 f La w,1 __ ect _ j _. . roved ffowever. �, Varr l. SA.-111 I1 r'A n oicrass. _9 ss� entelrs_; cirivewa (7-9 ee 3 ieeF J O TO S r RE r f � i''�m Watev h i Area W !I Le. Richard S. Adams. P.E. Robert S. Adams. L.S. James F. Benthin, L.S. Daniel B. Clark. L.S. Founded 1946 Basin Designation ADAMS, BENTHIN & CLARK, INC. /Uo Calc. R es Date Soil Group fN c_& C Factor: Land Use °o Professional Civil Engineers & Land Surveyors W. 1803 Maxwell Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201 • (509) 328 -5853 RUNOFF CALCULATION - RATIONAL METHOD • Area A 0,35 acres Slope ^'/ 0 ei Present Condition ❑ Future Condition $. C Product f'o04s4 Rkvi^o 77 0.90 0-693 s� o.� i J z3 0.10 0-o Weighted C: Time of Concentration: Overland Flow I Type of Surface Fakveol Elevation Difference j S ft. Length of Travel icy {t Time of Concentration Z min. Channel Flow Type of Channel Length of Travel ft Assumed Velocity ft. /sec. Time of Concentration min Total Time of Concentration Z rein. Rainfall Intensity: Storm Design Period (yrs.) Intensity i (in./hr.) 10 � I$ 50 100 Peak Discharae: Storm Design Period (yrs.) 0 = CiA (cfs) 10 O SQ 50 100 3 6Lte Project E Rep? t Check Date Richard S. Adams. P.E. Robert S. Adams. L.S. James F. Benthin. LS. Daniel B. Clark. L.S. Founded 1946 Cale. l e _ e n , i - Date Basin Designation C Factor: ADAMS, BENTHIN & CLARK, INC. Peak Discharge: Storm Design Period (yrs.) 10 50 .100 Professional Civil Engineers & Land Surveyors W. 1803 Maxwell Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201 • (509) 328 -5853 RUNOFF CALCULATION - RATIONAL METHOD o(7I Project Eft-jy1er:7 Pr p i) i + Check Date Soil Group Mc? Area A 6.35 acres Slope - Lt) 5i Present Condition ❑ Future Condition Ig �pp Land Use % C Product (� o0 mo t` ► 1 P n>, $O Q 510 O -J Z (a..o(sc•'pir,!.' 2_0 O.In 0_02 t i Weighted C: Time of Concentration: Overland FloY.' Q Type of Surface / a V2o" Elevation Difference Z ft. Length of Travel -zpa ft. Time of Concentration � min. Channel Flow Type of Channel Lenath of Travel ft Assumed Velocity ft. /sec. Time of Concentration min. Total Time of Concentration 3 r. min. Rainfall Intensity: Storm Design Period (yrs.) Intensity i (in./hr.) 10 3 Ir 50 100 Q = CiA (cfs) Richard S. Adams. P.E. Robert S. Adams, L.S. James F. Benthin. L.S. Daniel B. Clark. L.S. Founded 1946 4- aft ADAMS, BENTHIN & CLARK, INC. Basin Desianation /\J Z Project E t'e Q P O'oT. Calc. Ro,CAPC Date 3 /10 /ri Check Date / Soil Group f1 E C Factor: Present Condition ❑ Future Condition IS Land Use %, C Product enfs 1 c6 Pav;ic�, 71 0.9.0 0:639 La O�r>f Tcrn� D 9 i Q 10 0.0 Time of Concentration: Overland Flov n Type of Surface O',V Elevation Difference / ft. Length of Travel /00 ft, Time of Concentration Z min.' Channel Flov Type of Channel Length of Travel ft Assumed Velocity ft. /sec. Time of Concentration min. Total Time of Concentration Z min. Rainfall Intensity: Storm Design Period (yrs.) Intensity i" (in./hr.) 10 3 -IT 50 100 Peak Discharge: Storm Design Period (yrs.) 10 50 100 Professional Civil Engineers & Land Surveyors W. 1803 Maxwell Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201 • (509) 328 -5853 RUNOFF CALCULATION - RATIONAL METHOD Area A 0 ,2E" acres Slope 1.0 %< Weighted C: Q = CiA (cfs) 0.51 Richard S. Adams. P.E. Robert S. Adams. L.S. James F. Benthin. L.S. Daniel B. Clark. L.S. Founded 1946 Soil Group C Factor: 6c ADAMS, BENTHIN & CLARK, INC. • Professional Civil Engineers & Land Surveyors W. 1803 Maxwell Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201 • (509) 328 -5853 RUNOFF CALCULATION - RATIONAL METHOD Basin Designation A/0 e- Rc,(„es Date 3/10/71 v cL Project Check E_s r Pe Date Area A Q.5-acres Slope �- ) Present Condition ❑ Future Condition Land Use oio C Product kirifs ( 4 - 7O 0 .90 0 7a r,olCr -m � P 2Q 0 0.02 Weighted C: 0.74 Time of Concentration: Overland F lov.' Type of Surface 7� o.veJ Elevation Difference a ft. Length of Travel 2o0 ft, Time of Concentration min. Channel Flov: Type of Channel Length of Travel ft. Assumed Velocity ft. /sec. Time of Concentration min. Total Time of Concentration Rainfall Intensity: Storm Design Period (yrs.) Intensity i ( in./hr.) 10 3. J 50' 100 Peak Discharge: Storm Design Period (yrs.) 0 = CiA (cfs) 10 :76- 50 100 Richard S. Adams. P.E Robert S. Adams. L.S. James F. Benthln. L.S Daniel B. Clark. L.S. Founded 1946 Basin Designation Calc. e - , Oi�E'S Soil Group. M C Factor: / EFT ADAMS, BENTHIN & CLARK, INC. Land Use - N• Professional Civil Engineers 4 Land Surveyors W. 1803 Maxwell Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201 • (509) 328 -5853 RUNOFF CALCULATION - RATIONAL METHOD NO- S" Date - VI ot5i Rainfall Intensity: Storm Design Period (yrs. ) 10 50 100 Area A Project E Pep 15\i — Check Date r Q .12.. acres Slope Present Condition ❑ Future Condition Weighted C: C Product €66q a,,,n• 63 0 5=i0 n _ :67 37 0- JO ( 0,604- Time of Concentration: Overland Flow Type of Surface w, \ le o l Elevation Difference 077 ft.. Length of Travel ?� f Time of Concentration min. Channel Flow Type of Channel Length of Trove! ft. Assumed Velocity ft. /sec. Time of Concentration min. Total Time of Concentration Z - min. Intensity i (in./hr.) Peak Discharge: Storm Design Period (yrs.) O = CiA (cfs) 10 0 -2-3 50 100 of BMc /set OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Inter- office Communication To. Spokane County Subdivision Administrator From Rob McCann. land Development Coordinator Subject Ch? ^C^ cf Condition ApplirAtinn PM 11QF -R4 7N 149 -80 1. PE 1390 -80 - Esther's Replat #1 PUDE 2 -80 - Please add the following "Condition of Approval" at the public hearing for this proposal "That the proposed plat (Planned Unit Development) is subject to the provisions of Board of County Commissioners Resolution 80 -1592 and its associated Road Standards, Drainage Standard and Fee Schedules." 2. Windsong Addition PS 1254 "C " -78 - Change of Condition Application - No comments concerning this application. Date May 10 19 84 To Subject BMc /set •Form 327 -C.R. OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Inter - office Communication Spokane County Subdivision Administrator From Rob Mrrann, land Development Coordinator Date 1. PE 1390 -80 - Esther's Replat #1 PUDE 2 -80 - Please add the following "Condition of Approval" at the public hearing for this proposal "That the proposed plat (Planned Unit Development) is subject to the provisions of Board of County Commissioners Resolution 80 -1592 and its associated Road Standards, Drainage Standard and Fee Schedules." 2. Windsong Addition PS 1254 "C " -78 - Change of Condition Application - No comments concerning this application. .. �....w,.w +w.w.n..w.ar e+.+.-....-.+.•-- .- .._....- ........_... W01,ki+vw May 10 iq 84 ` -D /V SPOKANE Go4NTY 20545- 23 03 G---,-C LN. FOR BLKS NBS —X /` , �r //!. L ij / d R If: / 26 . v1 ° •� 9•• ...41..•11 ;c :-ltt,r 0 20541 -2304 ® 231 L- 2050. u Y�t/ER ,ry C,ry j • »G . ?.f11,1 ' ' sao'ca Cow N,-y Z O 4 20545- 2303 1 z Q - - 3 z� __ 3 1 2 # -2 o ° R '1-- • �" - r y s. — 1 o-., f l 94. /zLc . �O I . �q � I �7 ►3 1 --I © ( / /o•�. /OO 7 — 70 [ i 33 1 3f -� I ( G i I I 1 � � e I / � IL I 26'3e m 37 m , s- ---6z. ® - � —s: A I� f 0 I__ t.s I ®2S' 1 ID I ( I p I I I l9 I C I I (2 tV I o z5 ® I ® _ ? _� -- . — ( �I 15 ( 2 7 -___- s 1 1 rj t S5' 7 E I 7 1 � 6 14. ( 39 X 72' ` C -.5---9.7-71 � I � 1 1 1 _ l I N I 61-4.4- I I i i I I i ! 1 24 I 1 I b s o H M © i o -- -I L_ ��_ — I J ° i» ; I® I 6 5414 f � © 1 E1 © I _ i � , � I 1 I I ( V �� zl i D - 89.E a1 .s & I I y I �' I r it' H I I © N � G �. _ I ; F T E ? I I © I ® 1 ® i cr >8¢ 1 — 4. rat- 1_ • A 4; _ ;.zzs 1 - /13 236 ti 8 141,2' t E/6./4TH -- X Ty A ? 7 /95./5 N 01 23 A 2 A a FIFTH �O �0 tq • // 2.7 9/• � •6 r S r • 7 AIN 11, 0 I 1 9G II „- @ . 4./ j 0 1/ /2 II l l ' ^ rrQ ® t @ 111 I N ,u1 ill ._.5r a • @ 3 ef I N ,u1 •e• / 0 _ J �E F► i F 7 s 1 , (4 1 N 1, i it SO @ A5 3 @ o NJ 8 1 5 i / i ',c; /6- i, 14 m. -.11. ARCHERY AVE 108.78 4190`s. 106. f m . •25.)$.i. 14 /4 0 1 15 . L 7..4i; g 74.2i 7.5 1 h 2 2 /4,-2/ 5 22 ‘,,, /a.; 9 ... ' CI i ? — 0 ( 2? g '4 o'----' ? o . , 2 / AVE /10,10 13 9(209 5.j 11 t: e4 'J /A :CDS z 90 ' 17 co lb CO 0 (•'•-' .34 Crl •I7 16 — 7 -de 50 do t4 g 88 80 de $5 7/1 Ve: /Vo /( -57 Q 76.93 fr • gg.34 5Y 5 . E. ce. 20,77d. 217/.•11 44 )2 • • 4 3 2 @ CD iA 0 i i 7 49 o // /2 r [ 1 - 11 I 64, /3 8 lo _// ) vl 3 k /2 — Df• 2g 4 7 -* , /S927 /5,27 1 / 4-0 ; 1 4)- - /-19 /7 — -4 L 47 _ -1- - _ z . /3 'WA off144-Reitz 0 2 C 533 0 0 UN/YE 6 I .N/YL5f7S.17 //4J:3 YNTJI • / 7/1 PE /50-go PUDE z-s k 340 • 1 CA MP/L5 -1 1 ly/_2_7. LrFor L__ L._ / 1 k >4-v E, JOi c? 12 z i 1 21 ) 1/ /0 3 ai 7 tfo _ // TI/ (0^),C) t 37.0' z4O' .C• LeEA to.o` X4.0' 0 C C), Q' (O <,o t; / yEREB: CER TIFY THAT ': 7H/s PREZ/min/ARV PRAT WAS PREPARED [/ voeR, MY s''Pe '6s/ »V AND MS 7,4T: P/eov /sprvv,s- Ad ams, Bentt in &Clark, (nc. Civil Engineers' &Land Surveyors W1803 Maxwett Spokane, WA 99201 Phone 328 -5853 • DA:EA. . — 7(p p ` L1U C -51- H _t L-1. DEDICATION KNOW ° ALL MEN BY THESE'PRESENTS, that Northwood Properties Ina., formerly Gunning Blinders Inc.; and Sterling Savings Association, have caused to be platted into lots, Block and Common Area t land lad shown hereon, to be known as ° LUXURY COURT; being a Planned Unit Deve lopement and a Rep I at of Lot 2, Block I, Esther's Addition; described as follows: Lot 2, Block 1, ESTHER'S ADDITION, according to plat recorded in Volume 16 ot Plats, Page 33, in Spokane County, Washington. No lot shall be further subdivided for purposes of creating additional lots without filing a replat. The public water system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health authorities, the local fire district, County Building and Safety Department, and water purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider /sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot. WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain, or otherwise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the county to place 'their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunctionn with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. Ten foot wide utility easements are provided as shown hereon. The owners of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, of Block 1 shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the path of the natural or manmade drainage flow over and across the property. STATE OF WASHINGTON)SS COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) My commission expii;res ' . J ACKNOWLEDGEMENT a_ On this day of -- , 1988, before me personally appeared Theodore G. Gunning known .to be President of Northwood Properties' Inc.; _and . r . ' known to be .1'' - t • {�-_ , i of St e r I i ng Savings Association as the individuals who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged the same to be their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes herein mentioned. The officers of the above corporations on oath stated that they are authorized to execute.the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notar y, Public in and for the State Y� , Washington SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE This map correctly represents a survey :made by me or under requirements of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. Char es E. $ mpso PR �. 9967 Professional Engi ei an8' _ eyor BASIS OF BEARING The property owner or his representative shall.info each syceed.inq purchaser of all drainage easements on the property and his responsibility for maintaining drainage facilities within. said easements. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas nor the responsibility for any drainage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. Drainage easements, as platted and shown hereon, which are for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining drainage swales and .drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted. The County of Spokane is hereby granted the right •of ingress and egress to all drainage easements adjacent to the public. right -of -way. The property owner shall maintain the drainage swale with a permanent live cover of lawn turf, with optional shrubbery and /or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage swale 'as indicated by :the approved plans. The Planned Unit Developement Subdivision has been made with free consent; and in accordance with the desires of the owners of the lands so divided. The owners'adopt the plan of .Lots, Private 'Roads, and Common Area as shown hereon. All owners of lots in this plat will be members of the LUXURY COURT OWNERS ASSOCIATION and subject to the Articles of Incorporation and By -Laws thereof. This plat or any portion thereof and the use of any property therein shall be subject to and restricted by the terms of the Declaration of covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions of LUXURY COURT P.U.D., AS recorded r4f s?c,N (9 , 1988, under Auditor's File No. �8o31' -fo2 , which by reference is made a part hereof. The Common•Area, Lot 6, Block 1 as shown hereon, is not dedicated hereby use by. the general public but is dedicated solely to the common use and enjoyment of owners in this plat for landscaping, streets, drainage, utilities, recreation and other related activities, except as otherwise provided in this dedication and the Articles of Incorporation and By -Laws of the LUXURY COURT OWNERS ASSOCIATION and. the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of LUXURY COURT P.U.D. This • plat is subject to the separate DECLARATION OF COVENANTS REQUIRING PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE ROADS as recorded MA¢cH• 04 1988, under Auditor's Document No. 8803■402.tF, , which by reference is made apart hereof. The private road as shown hereon is an easement which provides a means of ingress and • egress for those lots within the plat having frontage thereon. Each lot shall be served by a public sewer system. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, We have hereunto set our hand affixed our seal this ,/ day l ,1988. 1 +� � `Sterling Savings Association Washington Residing at ion in conformance with the The bearing of East along the centerline of Eighth Avenue as per Esther's Addition was used as the Basis of Bearing for this plat. Y Northwood Properties, Inc. and of 12.35 LOT LOT BLOCK 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 FOUND I /2" PIN I hereby certify that the required taxes qn the herein platted land have been paid this ! /7 day ofd'( ' " ,1988 Spokane County Treasurer Examined and approved this �,� -t)' f ► ) By Spoken County Assessor Examined and approved this Spokane County Engineer Examined and approved this / `' day of 4 1988 SpZiKane Count Utilities Director Examined and a FOUND 3/4" PIPE AREAS AREA 6,120 SQ. 6,120 S. 6,648 SQ. 6,441 SQ. 6,626 SQ. 75,980 SO. roved this Examined and approved this J (670.25 MAP) -- 670.31- COUNTY OFFICIALS By ael AO Spokane Coianky Planning D Examined and approved this i,17 day of ey Spokane County Heath Ditrict:Health Officer partment Director FT. FT. FT. FT. FT. FT. Spokane County Commissioners Chairman day of 1 a. 2 K o Tr m � N N rt 0 p O z z d 0 0 0 M M Deputy 1� day of 1 Deputy day of day of 4/Zr___/../ li! X w a) Q W } J 0 0 J Q cr w 58O3 '75.62 ,nzaA ,1938 4th AVENUE 195.17 - (195.15 MAP) N 89 ° 33'49 "E ( N 89 "E MAP) 0• 2653.10 ,1989 ea 00 0. ,1988 ,1988 ,1988 Cq (195.15 MAP) 195.18 N 89 "E ( N 89 ° 33'57 "E MAP) EAST • LOT i BLOCK 1 0 0 0 ' 0 G / / / BLOCK LOT 6 COMMON AREA 105.51 UTILITY 37 • i- c- I' 1� ADDITION i ,— �� `S 11-1E1�.i ADDI , ION � O I a h 0 1 WEST 37 $792110' UTILITY Z J 0 0 ID 9.00 389 ( 0 0 O • 0 N 0 0 0 0 EASEMENT J cc 37 35 M O • � 2 , 1 .N 3Q — bmo' °§ O0 NI Oz 'pvMl ? _� 131.98 37 EASEMENT 0 0 • • • • • •• • • • • • i • • • 93.76 6 0 DRAINAGE 0 O z � - 327.08 ro - -,_— EIGHTH AVENUE -- 32708 -- I (132.00 MAP) 3 27.08 (327.12 MAP) s 11500 • N 69.78 1 a 69.78 69 -80 0 ; PlcLr 00 ”• EASEMENT EAST (ASSUMED AS PER ESTHER ADDITION) (2653.14 MAP) Z 69.98 (327.11 MAP) N 0 0 r• w c 0 (V 0 0 cn 0 ,M i J 0 0 W co 0 N 0 O 0 0 cn � JJ SCALE I" = 40' R. P's - E 1/4 CORNER, SEC. 20 S 74 °W, 1 1 2.07 NAIL a TAG 706 IN TRANSFORMER POLE S 60 38.95 TACK a TAG 706 IN POWER POLE SI4 °E, 71.96 TACK 8 TAG 706 IN POWER POLE -- 1655.71- - WILLIAM tf { a INAitir AUOi i Of :sPokAN cooNrr. *Asia.' • / rt3 144fi 17 9 20 AM" LEGEND SCALE 1 " =40' • _ FOUND 1/2" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED ABC INC. t 7317/13315' OR AS NOTE on CORNER SET - 1/2" REBAR WITH CAP NO. 8642/9967, OR AS NOTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY FINAL PLAT of LUXURY COURT A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT A REPEAT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1 OF ESTHER'S ADDITION LOCATED IN THE NE I/4 OF SECTION 20, T. 25 N. R.44 E.W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON , FOUND 3/4" PIPE WITH COPPER WIRE CLARENCE E. SIMPSON ENGINEERS IN N. 909 ARGON NE ROAD PH: 9261 SPOKANE _ WASH I NTON 9921 �. _ ... n Const. extra depth Drywell, Inlet Elev. 36.15 Const. level lawn area at Elev. - 35.82 Utility Easement Low Point & 33.36 F.F. 38.5 F. F. 38:5 10.00 E 23.- F. F. 37.0 Top of :Slope (Typ,) Const: extra depth Drywell, Inlet Elev. 33.24 Const: level lawn area at Elev. 32.91 S I D E WA`L`K 0.00 24 00 24 00 Low Point 36:67 0:00 0 0 • io 0 F. F. 37.5 N F. F. 37.5 - C 1/4 Corner Ex.st,ng 3/4' iron Pipe 8 R:P.s per F'nol Plot of Esther's Addition .. .Vol:._ Page L zo A 670. / 25 00 `- '^ - 1 1- Back of Walk 33.42 \ c Back ofWalk 34.62 Adams, Benthin & Clark, Inc. Civil Engineers is Land Surveyors W1803 Maxwell Spokane, WA 99201 Phone 328 -5853 Const extra depth Drywel 1, Inlet, Elev. ,36.55 „ Const. level lawh .area, at Elev:.36.22. , E`'1 /4' Corner: Existing County Monument at intersection. of ;Rood 1655.8d .. • _��..: . Const.. level lawn area at Elev.' 34.'55 Const. extra depth Drywell, Inlet Elev. 34.88 2' Class 8 Asphalt Conc. Pavement, W.S.H.D. Spec. 4 Crushed Surfacing Top Course, W.S.H.D. ,Spec. s Rib Note` Elevations given for'Ivel lawn areas are for top of mowed lawn. TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION 2 erenwe I. I ; t ;: ,c t t i< < < r< < t t t llltt(t I �.��,.4.4.4V,O. if.44 f i i Level Lawn Area r:me e vafi 2036 t_� Mr. Steve Horobiowski Subdivision Administrator Broadway Centre Building North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 Dear Mr. Horobiowski: This is to advise you that Northwood Properties Inc. hereby formally request that the final hearing on the above referenced P.U.D. be set upon receipt of this sub- mittal. Included are: 7 each 7 each 2 each 2 each 2 each 1 each March 18, 1981 "P.U.D. Site Plan" "Esthers Replat #1" "Landscape Plan" "Bldg. Floor Plan" "Elevation Plan" "Colored" Elevation and Landscape Plan You will note that our final design depicts 24 units and not 26 as was originally proposed. This is in re- sponse to FHA requirements to comply, with their "L.U.I." factor, relating to floor area /ground ratio. In addition; FHA is desirous of having a "loop system" of traffic circulation which revised our original site plan accord- ingly. The only impact from this is direct ingress /egress onto 8th Ave. for one duplex. However this is not deemed detrimental in terms of safety as - it is typical to all other conventional dwelling unit land uses along 8th Ave. In addition it has been reviewed by Spokane County Engineering and OK'd. The final architectural design are consistant with our preliminary projections with a sq.ft. range from 1233 sq.ft. - 1423 sq.ft. of finished floor area plus 2,car garages and 598 sq.ft. basements. ECE VED MAR 1. 81981 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 ,tv.t.0 44.1 Construction is anticipated to begin in July with completion of the project by January 1982. In review of your conditions for approval of this P.U.D.,'I find full compliance to the same. The plat of Esthers Addition was recorded March 12th, thereby establishing the "M -F" zone. Upon final acceptance of this P.U.D. plan, the final plat of Esthers •Replat #1 will be recorded and final review by FHA should be completed by June 1. Mr. Paul Clossin has been hired to draft the coven- ants and restrictions and the covenants will be avail- able prior to this hearing. If you have any questions please call me at 535 - 5302. DJH:lp cerely., Dwight J. Hume D. J. Hume Company Vim-. rr Q4 - 6dtev¼ 1 la Pe- Belo ao PoDc: ohs trio to' 0 0 0 Vol. Page 670.23a 25.00' - -�' 0 0 N Cf' 0 N C 1/4 Comer Existing 3/4' Iron Pipe 6 R_P.s per Final Plat of Esther's Addition 20' = 0 O 0 0 (1 N.89 26''E. 34.00' O O 10.00 0 0 0 z 10' Utility Eosement per Plot recorded in Book at Page 4.00' 0 O N O. O a N 4.00' O 0 O O N O 0 R ECEIVEp MAR igt9dt A REPEAT OF LOT 2, BLOCK I, ESTHER'S ADDITION SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 34.00 24.00' 37.00 37.00' EAST n0 `O 0 N. 89° 58' 26" 60.00 22 60.00' 21 60.00 24 60.00' 23 60.00' 19 24.00 O 2 0 24.00' O O 0 0 2 3:,0 EAST 327/2' 23.00' IN THE NE I/4, SECTION 20,T. 25 N.,R.44E., W.M. SPOKA NE C Ot/N T Y, WA SH/N6 TO N SCALE 1 24.00 O 0 ro - 0 O 4.00' O o 0 0 20 N N 4.00' O O ro S.89° 58' 2 6 "W 0 O a 24.00' WEST WEST FINAL PLAT ES 1 1 JER'S REPEAT O 0 24.00 - 0 0 4 0 0 24.00' 24.00' 24.00' O 0 0 0 0 6 24.00' 34.00' O O ro 0 0 rri N 10.00' - 0 0 rO N v 10.00' H cc O 2 O 0 ti ro 34.00 LOT 25 (COMMON AREA) 18 0 0 co 0 EAST 24.00' 24.00' W E AS T 17. 8th= AVENUE 34.00 0 0 0 v7 H 0 z - 0 0 -... re;D N O 10.00 FEBRUARY, 1981 24.00' _O O O O 0 7 0 CD 24.00' EAST 0 24.00' 24.00' O 0 0 CD 24 00' 24.00' O O O 0" 24.00' WEST 34.00' 0 O 0 O N 10.00' 327// WEST 32 7.1 1 O 0 d' ro 4 00' w 3 ro N 0 0 0 4.00' 0 0 N O O 0 0 N 23.00 - o O 0 0 O 23.00 0 S.89 31" W. 163.56' 0 0 Adams, Benthin & Clark, Inc. Civil Engineers & Land Surveyors W1803 Maxwell Spokane, WA 99201 Phone 328.5853 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 15 60.00' 16 LEG EN N.89 58 31 " E 14 37.00 37.00' F ound existing No 4 re "r, with plastio' cap marked ABC, -Inc, 7317/13315" -"._.i...m._. - S et No, 4 rebar with plastic . cap marked ABC, Inc. 7317/13315 at properly corners` . - - -� ....:..,....,:+�+■. ..:.:w :L & L P lot Boundary O O sr N 0 0 0 0 12 N N 0 O 0 4 13 N N 0 - 0 (V W Ql N 0 ° 0 ui 4.00' 0 O N 4.00' N O ° 0 Utility Easement per plat recorded in Book at Page S.89 ° 58'31 "W. 34.11 - 0 0 0 0 COUNTY UTILITIES DIRECTOR O E " 1/4 Corner Existing County E xamined sa approved Otis CT.. , 981, N Monument at intersection of University. Road. 'Spokane County Utilities Director' 1655.80' 0 O SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 1, .lames .F. Benthin, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor, hereby certify that the map shown hereon was prepared by me subsequent to a n actual survey on the ground in , 1981, and that the same conforms in all respects to the provisions of the ordinances of Spok ane C ounty, now in effect, and that the lot corners and monuments have been properly set. 0 0 21 DEDICATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENT COUNTY ENGINEER xam ned and approved this day of , 1981, County Engineer COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Examined and ,ap prove ! th day of , 1981: Planning Director Cha i rmaln, COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ts; plat was approved dnd accepted by the County Commissioners of. Spokane County, Washington, on this day of , 1981. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT ned' anc James F. Benthin, Registered Professional Land Surveyor Spokane County Commissioners rove d" this day of , `1981. COUNTY TREASURER Health Officer Don 1±�1 Brawn Treasur of County, Washington, do hereby `. certify that all taxes which have been levied and become rrcgeable against he land shown within this map and described' in the dedication of this date, hove been fully paid, satisfied 1. dt saitar eel .: Dal tl this day of , 1981. Spokane County Treasurer COUNTY ASSESSOR F xarnned and app roved tkiis dray of 1981, . `. Sp okane County Assessor 2 .0 37.' 24.0 24.07' • Cn, c - ), C)' CoO. -. 3 .c d ,• G_� NERE5Y CERT /PY THAT 7 Hh?` PI /NP/ MAR V PLAT* WAS' PREPARED ; a/v. 6w /r!/ ;SaPek O N AND C i1/i k' IS 7?) 74'E' f'k V /s /CiN,s s X4/16 COUNTY . cee/ r /oA' . Adams Benth n C Clar Civil Eng & Su rveyors WT803 Max Spo WA 99201 Phone 328 -5853 SCLLE., (" - zn' TH ! _*1 --HCUT P cu :c7 -r 4'' -'�_,: FIRST /O' -- - - (EA. 182. 51 N4GI 1' io ./9273' AvE. to:• ?S 13a16r: rie sad ao�� ITH ®s►amaaia jai -umr .. 300 iirr a . a11® Sate 309.9' o • EQUA ION \ 544 +79.5 Ahd 0 1 5 IC 4 + 81:� RT." Bk. � C.3o°00� 240 a Q ° 44/R� -� r 21 3�.5" IP L.72.4-' •t 544 + 09.2 P.C. R. R. R/w 34.40.38 d E7°54 Pt k:89° 39'W LL+��y- L..�i :' . /o� .. my. Q.an. is �l N ° Z�o25 R•R R/t✓.o 241 .M1 Me n Z a 65'4.4 •A RE <A R/W 21577 ;' 4,401 0.64 7 is S EC77OA' R EPROD UGED PROM SLOPE EASEMENTS CRP` l4 /2 .TISHMAN - MICA B. --. a 95 v.�15t? s. D .t-, .. C. . R - A co 6 Pt.,E'nrE RY, Np r Lb N6GR" .^-0* OamiztAriON = 1 s pF.iG,., L /N6•/ vt..AT.) .-,. No.1 206, OFFICIAL PLAT A.RR .: SCOTT - ENGINEER — SPOKANE 227 6544 E. N°_ 2292 300 '.ft45. po +Oa U N!VER5!TY H 1 GH SCHOOL GROUNDS 1145.3 r:40. 1925 N 01 z _,. 3 0 0 .:.. PRINCIPAL ?SSJSTAt.J o 4. k " u o q� 0 c9 0 t9 IAU �. Doe /or/38 B - F71E•✓ /84' 3 7. C O U N'