Loading...
PE-1407-81r iki �) P14- r1a_,y_e. e a s e nte..,,p o ..-CZ- cIe &. I IS 1 6 ' 14 4'3o •. (.4 to D dS „ e ss f p k,��(A e / a 3) e. sort ne�o. � �r i oaa c5"� ,9 D¢ e cis A r° ,,,a -F j 1a C° b'C r) e E #4-1 - - mot ,� - s -� � 6 1) cit_e_t R, ;t P 1 - -e " - t ..,,, it ✓ 2.4 ./ + — fir] 7) 1 4 e eJ 2(w Pe eels f- ( ete S°-- 4e 1 � w Ac 6 . N # A lf 4enrie•e - o c Lon /Z P4A C H&c K Fee .J.32_o p it,' Ai env , &floc✓ 6C� Vr..c 4t s.e c#dW & 4s« fir' .B6- � r4 r /A s ox- P'--#r .�.oe,¢len..l,Sr 7 :77.e 0 i „c- tea. .a.,At rs 0 Z v E t_E r.E'cr,r &ifs .' - - 1 OCG sit- - , . . o u/ o ns-s -0 K .c - T 4 - D� 4-or e • ,_ £ ,✓u w It g � ] o K- o -r S. i 6.e - GLo Ca,i'd (s oK . __ . Ai /A " - Ron- w .e- if AfterK A CI-03C? /" 0 \Odic, -T/oN n r 11Q n P2 �_ r,'f Tni i • I I Fh � e* AZ.0/c A! w &VP% R io - CAC p snatPa e&Jr A1/y N/A .Ac f— ‘5 Pecs ilea n R /w■ - DEA /CRT i n, Den. IVA6a 4,u b.oasaf.S . a--K °(<- K 0 - 1 .1 Ft.coo ',foeA nuc.e And. / ar; RnAn Dq � N A N /A: o fl PO l trara /Co wD 10442vie.h Olu u R S . L_ of 4.1 U CSc- K IP rscN 544 -417-4° € to 544 -07 =uo w kd L Pi-MAIL � �) r nJ _Bo.a J &p D ,� cEO (2,9z-) R e o . S34 R GAD /til Iu.es (1 Ew e _ .__ .3j e&)eD /Z : C i3.0o Rc szMowcE 126 e a _ By EMG, *Jee Co /11/85 r iki �) P14- r1a_,y_e. e a s e nte..,,p o ..-CZ- cIe &. I IS 1 6 ' 14 4'3o •. (.4 to D dS „ e ss f p k,��(A e / a 3) e. sort ne�o. � �r i oaa c5"� ,9 D¢ e cis A r° ,,,a -F j 1a C° b'C r) e E #4-1 - - mot ,� - s -� � 6 1) cit_e_t R, ;t P 1 - -e " - t ..,,, it ✓ 2.4 ./ + — fir] 7) 1 4 e eJ 2(w Pe eels f- ( ete S°-- 4e 1 � w Ac 6 . N DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS March 14, 2002 US Bank of Washington 428 W. Riverside Spokane, WA 99201 RE: (Old National Bath) Savings Certificate # 9715 -475 -1 for Residential Construction of Valley Vista Estates. P1407 Dear Sir or Madam: Please be advised that the Savings Certificate # 9715 - 475 -1 issued by your company to Guthrie Investments as surety for installations of roads and associated drainage facilities for the above mentioned plat in the remaining current amount of $6,000.00 may now be released in full effective immediately. The project roads have been established and the warranty period has expired. This final release should close out the above referenced surety. If you have any questions, please call me at (509) 477 -3600. Sincerely, John Hohman, PE Development Services Engineer/Manager cc: File A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 • (509) 477 -3600 FAX: (509) 477 -7655 (2nd Floor) 477 -7478 (3rd Floor) • TDD: (509) 477 -7133 0 Project Name: VAU-ET yi syA. Project Number: lam- Location: doele "be_ C .FR_ - (le.DDE D,eAUc Original Bond Amount: Original Bond Date: Bond Balance: Reviewed by: Findings: RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Release Bond 2. Reduce Bond 3. Continue Bond 1. y . DEVELOPER BOND REVIEW FORM 6 /bcf /ts 600?j REVIEW Last Review Date or Punch List Date: Work Remaining to be Completed: y u s 1' S goav5 F TA -Su 1Ia EP KzoVe✓D ACTION TAKEN (Circle Actions) By: FOLLOW UP Follow up Scheduled: Comments: Files Updated Comments: Files Updated Comments: Files Updated Comments: Files Updated Comments: Files Updated Comments: Date: 7 / 7_-4/9/ Action Taken: 1. Release Bond Letter 2. Reduce Bond Letter 3. Continue Bond 4. None Date : Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: I 0 By: By: By: By: By: Inter - office Communication To Jim Emacio From Subject JS /set Form 327 -C.R. Jerry Sims 9,47 c OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date Nay 30 19 85 VALLEY VISTA ESTATES PE 1407 A railroad crossing is needed at some point in time to supply an alternative access to the Ponderosa Area. We require that as plats file and lots are created that the developer set aside funds in an account to help pay for this crossing. We would then take the money from these accounts when the crossing is constructed to help pay for it. Does this assignment accomplish this for us? If not, please modify it so that it does. : r s ASSIGNMENT the property of GUTHRIE INVESMENTS, INC. Dated this 28th day of May, 1985. X For security purposes only, GUTHRIE INVESTMENTS, INC., a Washington corporation hereby assigns to Spokane County, a municipal corporation, the following: Savings certificate number 9715 -475 -1 in the fact amount of $6,000.00 and held in and by the OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, Corporate Banking Department. This assignment is made as security for the full and faithful performance by Guthrie Investments, Inc. of the construction of certain railroad crossings in Valley Vista Estates (in the Ponderosa area) as specified in specifications for said subdivision. Any interest benefits accruing under said savings certificate shall remain Said savings certificate is to be released to GUTHRIE INVESTMENTS, INC. or any other party only with the prior written consent and agreement of Spokane County. By: GUTHRIE INVESTMENTS, INC. Ralph Guthrie, President OLD NATIO BANK OF WASHINGTON By: AKA y ,5 J. Jay Lewis, Vice President <i ASSIGNMENT Savings certificate No. 9715 -475 -1 in the face amount of $6,000.00 and held in and by the OLD National Bank of Washington located at 1 SPOKANE COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Donald C. Brockett 5 ex"— c(ret MEMO TO: Jerry Sims , Spokane County Engineering Department FROM: James P. Emacio, Chief Civil. Deputy Prosecuting Attorney DATE: June 1, 1985 RE: PS- 1407- 81 /ZS- 40- 81(Valley Vista Estates) After reviewing the proposed assignment agreement with regard to the above referenced matter,I would recommend that the draft be modified to provide as follows: Whereas, the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee approved the prelliminary plat and zone change PS- 1407 -81, Valley Vista Estates, and ZS -40 -81 (Unclassified to R -1) subject to certain conditions, one being #15 within the Findings and Order which condition provided materially as follows: #15. That the plat sponsor shall set aside in an escrow account ,Payable to Spokane County upon demand, the a- mount of $500.00 per lot for the exclusvie purpose of helping to construct a railroad crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad inthe vicinity of said plat.; Whereas, Gutherie Investments, Inc. is desirous of finalizing PS- 1407-81, Valley Vista Estates and ZS -40 -81 (Unclassified to R -1) and inconjunction with the same of meeting condition #15 referenced in the immediately preceeding recital by assigning a savings certificate to Spokane County. NOW, THEREFORE, for and inconsideration of meeting condition #15 within the Spokane County Hearing Examinder Findings and Order, a photo copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment "A" and incorporated herein by reference as if fully repeated herein, GUTHERIE INVESTMENTS, INC., a Washington corporation, hereby assigns to Spokane County, a political subdivision of the state of Washington, the following: Trust Department. Any interest benefits accruing under said savings certificate shall remain the property of Gutherie Investments, Inc. Gutherie Investments, Inc. authorizes Old National Bank of Washington to release all moneys within the above savings certificate, exclusvie of interest earnings as provided for herein , to Spokane County upon receipt of written request signed by the Spokane County Engineer referencing the savings certificate no. and including a statement that the moneys will be used exclusively and solely for the purpose of meeting condition #15. But for releasing the savings certificate as set forth in this document, neither the savings certificate nor any moneys within said savings certificate shall be released to any other party without the prior writtenconsent and agreement of Spokane County. 2 Plumy 11191111 ---1 ' I '- • FINIAL SLAT IM I our I -- - -I PLAT CLOSURE ZOAD NAME via „at . � ; i A � d , 6 n..e e. `: ^° t 42 o4-- AO3'ACEKT Q.EA Title - -or'. : ; W 5d- -P 5 ta 5 44 PLAT • P �tAINAGE I -- PLAT ER R oho pLAM 4. PR,oFtLE Iii ___ Ptim c�� F IN D+L 1 N I �����I otP WI MGSIMI D R p.i K A6 E I- E MEEt KG PE as It r� - I peve Lo peg. Ito Pd) Ao KD DR Anti AGE pc C COO n1TY EVR:e, I-- SIGN b PLAT To I P A Pk ENV - M 0 K U *ear Bo kb (REMARKS i) $ y r a a 5 _ Et 2 ialsa b rc f ,- ,���/�f� Cc• �a-'� 8) egfierS 7 n C( ap _ s py,- i a.-ee� s J i' VPS acieS ea. 4 emu, Lot- 4..-. --" , 1 . ` 4dt 5 5,9; 5 aL I . -r 9r.^- 'W'�j9 e e.i.�c (31 , 9) -Pcr le1.q-2oa.GQ- (UP ASse SS.-.. e3c-r e,..3 c 9 -----2 0-6 gin, a /`e4ct1 t coce0e f) V El: I & � ._=� 129 o `offs a r) 3 6 k k_ a G--a_1- )9 , VALLE'1 Vt e GSTAM es 0145A BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 88 0862 IN THE MATTER OF ESTABLISHMENT OF PONDEROSA DRIVE AND GERTRUDE DRIVE IN VALLEY VISTA ESTATES NO. 1407 COUNTY ENGINEER'S FILE NO. 2581 RESOLUTION - ESTABLISHMENT This being the day set for the hearing on Spokane County Engineer's Report on the proposed establishment of PONDEROSA DRIVE AND GERTRUDE DRIVE IN VALLEY VISTA ESTATES NO. 1407, proceedings for which were initiated by PRELIMINARY RESOLUTION No. 88 -0788, and it appearing to the Board on proof duly made that Notice of Hearing was published and posted in the manner and for the time required by law, and the Board after examining the report and maps of the Spokane County Engineer and all claims and papers on file and after hearing all other evidence adduced at the hearing; and IT FURTHER APPEARING That the rights -of -way have been dedicated as public roads, 60 feet wide, and that said roads are a public necessity and the same should be opened and established as County roads. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington,. that the hereinafter described roads as reported by the Spokane County Engineer on the 16th day of August, 1988, being more particularly described as follows: PONDEROSA DRIVE - from the West Section line of Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 E.W.M. East and Northeasterly to the South line of Myron Estates No. 8, Plat No. 1054 GERTRUDE DRIVE - from the South line of Ponderosa Drive Southeasterly to and including cul -de -sac. Located all in Government Lot 9, in the West Half (W 1/2) of Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 E.W.M. in the Plat of Valley Vista Estates No. 1407. and as shown by the records and maps on file in the office of the Spokane County Engineer be and the same hereby are established as County roads and the same shall be known as PONDEROSA DRIVE AND GERTRUDE DRIVE No. 2581. The road supervisor of the road district in which the said roads are located is hereby directed to open , and maintain the same for public use and travel. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED That the West 60 feet of Lot 1 Block 3, Myron No. 8 Addition No. 1054 (one foot strip) is hereby dedicated for County road purposes. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED That the County Engineer is directed to cause a copy of this resolution to be recorded in the Office of the County Auditor. PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, this 6th day of September, 1988. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE CLERK OF THE BOARD BY VVAet!' .._ z BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON OT 9. reap. runAJA2oouo \y i • I i 11151111 genuitwio re; EA arerpoweth so wilt rogalmli'cm''' 24 ah*IC Mg TAM rir IM airbiatortim °lair In al ✓ 1110 m ai o . T 171 CtCrC FFO. G "KG" A..c N 09R R r--- 8 RESOLUTION NO. 86 0352 IN THE MATTER OF DEVELOPER'S SECURITY AGREEMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 418 ATTEST: AM E. DONAH RK —OF THE BOA R E S O L U T I O N BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON WHEREAS, the Developer of the plat of Mica View Estates First Addition has requested the required road improvements in the development be completed under a Road Improvement District; and WHEREAS, Road Improvement District No. 418 has been created for this purpose; and . WHEREAS, it is necessary that the Developer provide a letter of credit to secure the payment of three years of principle and interest on the Road Improvement District bonds; and WHEREAS, a letter of credit and agreement have been executed by the Developer and his bank and presented same to the County for approval. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washingtron that the letter of credit and agreement between Ralph D. Guthrie and Gertrude Guthrie are hereby accepted and the Chairman of the Board or a majority of the Board authorized to execute such documents by and on behalf of Spokane County. PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, this 29th day of April, 1986. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SP I COU 1INGTON 86 0352 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the if day of /` // , 1986, by and between SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal corpora- tion of the State of Washington, (the "County "), RALPH D. GUTHRIE and 414mtth GUTHRIE, husband and wife, ( "Developer "), and SHEARSON LEHMAN BROTHERS INC., FOSTER & MARSHALL DIVISION, (the "Corporation "), a corporation, herein sometimes referred to collectively as the "Parties." RECITALS WHEREAS, Developer owns a parcel of real property within the County; WHEREAS, Developer seeks the construction and installation of improvement by grading, construction of drainage appurte- .nances, driveway approaches and curbs, paving with asphalt con= .crete and doing such other work as may be necessary in connection therewith; WHEREAS, the County has created Road Improvement District No. 418 to assist in the financing of the costs of the proposed improvements; WHEREAS, the County desires to issue bonds to finance such construction and installation, and seeks additional security so that funds will be readily available to pay the principal of and interest on such bonds when due; and WHEREAS, Shearson Lehman Brothers Inc., Foster & Marshall Division, the proposed purchaser of the bonds, requests addi- tional security for the payment of principal of and interest on the bonds in the form of a letter of credit as a precondition to .:the purchase of such bonds; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the Parties agree as follows: Section 1: Definitions. The following terms will have the following meanings unless the context clearly requires otherwise. (a) "Bonds" means any and all Road Improvement Dis- trict No. 418 Bonds hereafter authorized to be issued for costs of the Improvements. (b) "Bond Fund" means the "Road Improvement District No. 418 Bond Fund" created and established pursuant to the Resolution. -1- (c) "District" means the Spokane County Road Improve- ment District No. 418. (d) "Improvements" means those improvements ordered by the County to be installed and constructed in the District, which may be modified to the extent that the Board of County Commissioners of the County may, in its judgment, deem ad- visable, provided such modifications do not substantially alter the plan of such improvements. (e) "Letter of Credit" means a letter or letters of credit to be issued pursuant to Section 2 of this Agreement, and otherwise in form satisfactory to counsel to the County and to the Corporation. (f) "Resolution" means Resolution No. 84 -0857 of the County creating the District. Section 2: Letter of Credit. The Developer shall cause an irrevocable Letter of Credit to be issued to the County in an amount of . 120,000.00" (three years' average annual interest on the Bonds) for the succeeding six years. The Letter of Credit shall be subject to the following terms and conditions: (a) The Letter of Credit shall be issued by a bank acceptable to the County and the Corporation. (b) The Letter of Credit shall be dated as of the date of Road. Improvement District No. 418 Bonds. (c) The Letter of Credit shall be irrevocable for a term of not less than six (6) years from its date. Alter- natively, a one -year or other term irrevocable Letter of Credit subject to automatic renewals over a period of time not less than six (6) years from the date of the original Letter of Credit may be issued. If such one -year or other term irrevocable Letter of Credit is issued, it must provide that the County shall receive written notice by certified or registered mail of the non - renewal of the Letter of Credit at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration date of 'the Letter of Credit then in effect in order to effectuate a non - renewal and that upon receipt of such notice, the County may draw upon the Letter of Credit then in effect. (d) The Letter of Credit shall be issued in favor of. the County as its beneficiary. (e) For the purpose only of determining the principal amount of the Letter of Credit, the estimated rate of inter- est on the Bonds has been calculated by reference to the rate upon which bonds are then sold for road improvement districts at the time the Letter of Credit is issued and the -2- aggregate principal amount of the Bonds will be based on the construction cost for the Improvements, preliminary engi- neering and other costs of the Improvements incurred and the estimated costs of issuance of the Bonds. The estimated rate of interest and estimated size of the Bond issue will be determined by the Corporation, whose estimates will be conclusive. (f) The Letter of Credit shall provide payment shall be made upon receipt by the Letter of Credit of a written certificate Treasurer, or the functional successor to demanding payment of a sum identified in the icate and certifying that one or more of events has occurred: (1) interest penalties (2) fied or Letter of -3- RJKW21 /08 that immediate issuer of the of the County such officer, written certif- the following one or more installments of principal of or on one or more District assessments and /or have not been paid when due; the County received written notice by certi- registered mail of the non - renewal of the Credit. (g) The Letter of Credit shall provide that the'County may make consecutive or successive demands for payment under the Letter of Credit until its entire principal balance has been paid to the County. If a demand for a portion of the Letter of Credit is made the County may give the Developer notice to restore the Letter of Credit to its full amount. If, after written notice the Letter of Credit is not so restored, the County may make demand for the entire remaining principal balance. (h) The Letter of Credit shall provide that the venue of any action commenced with regard to such Letter of Credit or payments to be made pursuant to it shall lie in the Spokane County Superior Court, that the laws of the State of Washington shall apply in any such action, and that the losing party in any such action shall pay the attorneys' fees and costs of the prevailing party. Developer agrees that its obligations pursuant to this Sec- tion shall continue regardless of whether or not it owns property within the District; provided, that its obligation may be ful- filled by its causing a subsequent landowner or landowners to cause a Letter of Credit to be issued, in which event Developer shall remain obligated in the event such substitute Letter of Credit does not comply in every respect to the conditions of this Agreement. Developer recognizes and acknowledges the paramount impor- tance to the County, the Corporation, and the holders of the Bonds of the full and timely payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds and, therefore, expressly waives any right it has or may have hereafter to enjoin or otherwise prevent payment to the County under the Letter of Credit and agrees to limit the en- forcement of any claim it has or may have hereafter for improper payment under the Letter of Credit to an action against the County for repayment of the sum claimed to have been paid improperly. The County agrees to hold the Letter of Credit and to draw on it promptly upon the occurrence of an event described in Sec- tion 2(f) above. The County further agrees to deposit the pro- ceeds of such draws into the Bond Fund for payment of principal of and interest on outstanding Bonds unless no Bonds are out- standing or unless the full payment of all outstanding Bonds is provided for by money on deposit in the Bond Fund, in which event the County may deposit the proceeds of such draws, or the excess of such proceeds after providing for the full payment of all out- standing Bonds into its Road Fund. Section 3: Purchase and Sale of Bonds. The Corporation covenants and agrees to present to the County on or before forty - five (45) days following confirmation by the Board of County Commissioners of the assessment roll for the District a bona fide offer to purchase the Bonds under the following terms and condi- tions: (a) The purchase price may be at par plus accrued interest to the date of delivery. tured the determined bymthe Corporation,lshavingca last maturity twelve (12) years from their date. (c) The Bonds shall be issued in the denomination of $5,000 each, or integral multiples of $5,000, except for Bond No. 1, which may be in a different denomination, the total principal amount of which shall be the maximum lawful amount the County may issue under applicable law, reduced only by such amount as may be necessary to assure, in the opinion of Preston, Thorgrimson, Ellis & Holman, the exemp- tion of interest on the Bonds from Federal income taxation. (d) The Bonds shall bear an interest rate to be nego- tiated between the County and the Corporation to be set at the time the Bonds are purchased. (e) Such other terms and conditions as the Corporation may reasonably require to assure the marketability of the Bonds. -4- RJKW21 /0g RJKW21 /08, • The obligation of the Corporation to accept and pay for the Bonds shall be subject to the following terms and conditions; (a) Passage by the County of a Resolution authorizing the issuance of the Bonds in conformity of the law and this Agreement, which shall provide, in addition, for copies of all notices of call of the Bonds prior to maturity to be. furnished to the Corporation contemporaneously with publica- tion thereof. (b) Approval by the County of an Official Statement for the Bonds acceptable to the Corporation. (c) The Bonds shall be printed and delivered to the Corporation, and bond counsel's opinion furnished, all at the County's expense, within forty -five (45) days of the date of acceptance by the County of the offer of the Corpor- ation to purchase the Bonds, but the date of delivery of the Bonds to the Corporation may be, by agreement between the County and the Corporation only, extended an additional thirty (30) days. (d) Receipt of a copy of the duly issued Letter of Credit. (e) Receipt of an opinion of Preston, Thorgrimson, Ellis & Holman that the Letter of Credit is valid and an enforceable obligation of its issuer, subject only to appli- cable creditors' rights and insolvency laws in the event of insolvency of its issuer and that this Agreement is a valid and enforceable obligation of the Parties hereto, subject only to applicable creditors rights and insolvency laws. (f) Receipt of an unqualified approving legal opinion of Preston, Thorgrimson, Ellis '& Holman with respect to the validity of the Bonds and that the interest on the Bonds is exempt from Federal income taxation, dated the date of de- livery of the Bonds. (g) Receipt of a signature identification and non - litigation certificate in usual form executed by the Chair- man of the Board of County Commissioners and the County Auditor and dated the date of delivery of the Bonds. (h) Such terms and conditions as shall at the time of making such offer be usual or appropriate in the underwrit- ing industry applicable to the Spokane County, Washington, area. (i) The occurrence of no material adverse change in the financial condition of the County or Developer, or the security for the Bonds following the date of this Agreement. -5- County Spokane County Treasurer Spokane County Courthouse West 1116 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 -0100 Developer Ralph D. an Section 4: Waiver of Subrogation. Developer hereby irrevo- cably waives any right of subrogation whatsoever in or to any legal or equitable right the County may now or hereafter have against any person whose property is within the District and subject to its assessments, arising out of or under any payment made or to be made pursuant to any Letter of Credit. The failure or refusal of the County to enforce any right against Developer, or any Letter of Credit, shall not bar or constitute any defense, offset or counterclaim to any action by the County hereunder, under any Letter of Credit or agreement under which the same may be held for the County, or under any power or authority the County may now or hereafter have. Section 5: Notices. Any and all notices, demands, or other communications between the parties hereto, which shall not in- clude any demand or effort to collect the proceeds of any Letter of Credit, shall be effective only if in writing and when re- ceived at the address of the addressee set forth below, except that any party may by notice so given furnish notice that a dif- ferent address shall thenceforth apply to it for receipt of notice. East 9919 Broadway Spokane, WA 99206 Corporation Shearson Lehman Brothers Inc. Foster & Marshall Division 999 Third Avenue Suite 4000 Seattle, Washington 98104 Section 6: Amendments. This Agreement may be amended only in writing by all parties hereto; provided that such amendment is fully executed and delivered prior to execution of construction contracts for the Improvements. Thereafter, the holders of the Bonds shall be deemed to be parties hereto for purposes of this Agreement, and must approve in writing any amendments hereto, until expiration or exhaustion by exercise of the last Letter of Credit outstanding. -6- 4Ti2...1*LGuthrie RJKW21 /08 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this • Agreement as of the date first above written. - SPOK/ COUNTY INGTON esid0/ 4 14 -1 1 :M4 411 )711 Ayr -7- irman of the Board of County Commissioners SHEARSON LEHMAN BROTHERS INC. FOSTER & MARSHALL DIVISION By: Vice President RALPH D. GUTHRIE /, Gertrude GUTHRIE RJKW21/08 • N T HIS AGREEMENT is entered into this it, day of , 198$, by and between Spokane County, a municipal corpdtation of the State of Washington, (the County) and Ralph D. Guthrie and Gertrude Guthrie, husband and wife, (Developer) WITNESSETH: THESE parties desire to amend and modify that certain Agreement dated as of the d9 day of �i�L 1986, as it affects these particular parties, which' Agreement was made ,.between Spokane County, Ralph D. Guthrie and Gertrude Guthrie, ,and Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., Foster 6 Marshall Division, said Agreement being amended in the following respects: 1. The specific description of the property involved in Road Improvement District No. 418 as described in the Agreement is legally described as: Plat of Valley Vista Estates, according to Plat recorded in Book 17, page 66, County of Spokane, State of Washington, and unplatted land bordering Gertrude Drive to the South. 2. Three of the lots within the plat have been conveyed out to other parties, the prior landowners, under a separate agreement, specifically Lots 1, 6, and 7, Block 1, Valley Vista Estates. 3. It is agreed between the County and the Developer that the Letter of Credit described in the Agreement shall be reduced by the amount of interest on the bonds as guarantee the interest payments against the lots previously transferred, Lots 1, 6, and 7, Block 1, Valley Vista Estates. The amount of the reduction shall be based upon the preliminary assessments levied against those particular lots. Except as modified herein, the said Agreement shall remain in full force and effect between these parties. ?:i;-h? *t•;;' SPOKANE C WASHINGTON t MODIFICATION TO AGREEMENT C airman of the Board of County Commissioners ALP D. GUTHRRIE V / GERTRUDE GUTHRIE January' :17 Robert Turner Pc.' 'Spokane County Engineer. N:?g811 Jefferson "l FSpokane/ Washington 99201 RE + Drai nag e.PondfValleyfV.ista Estates,inica`. View , Dear.:Hr Turner: �a 4Ga,, Sxs tr �xF 5. •t I DEVELOPMENT. ,'GUTHRIE INVESTMENT, INC. • .You stated during our meeting January 8, 1986 that if we had any problems "`' with!' your_; department to contact you.' that meeting I mentioned to :.you that` �f your; office was going to inform us.- iCsome mechanism exists to have an assess— . charged to' the lots in Valley Vista Estates for the drainage Pond thatjis proposed for Mica View Estates 1st Addition; as this pond replaces one that be'included'in R I .1.).% t for Valley Vista `� P�, is > `i • ,.,11r .,Smale, 'of. your office, ;was j waiting, for a legal' opinion from the; Prosecter',: ',off ice.'' At :the time of our;meeting,' we had waited 'three. weeks for '. some answer 'Now "another week, lus r has: b with no response. _, , P g Y h P r 1 do snot` see any;.. reason'to1proceed < with a cost estimate for this Pond, if there !. is no vehicle to allow for a monetary contribution from thealots in Valley Vista • Estates ,r :'�".� } 1 . "t� r xa z,` �' b .' HEALTH CARE FACILITIES - MULTI- FAMILY AND RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUC .,� :... t o ;.. / 1 ; April 1, 1986 LAND DEVELOPMENT SPOKANE -- Ralph Guthrie • RG'thimt" Robert Turner ';• Bob McCann ✓ Jim Emacio Roy Koegan.:'• r I Bob Waldo Doug Adams ' Commissioner :Shepard a GUTHRIE INVESTMENT INC. . East'9211'_Trent Auenue Spokane;; Washington 99206' BELLEVUE Verl Smale c/o Office of the Spoka - Count Engineer 1 N. 811 Jeffersoni• • • Spokane, Washington 99201 RE: R.I.D'. 418, and Guthrie's Mica View Estates. First Addition drainage structures Dear Verle: RECEIVED. APR .2 8 1986 SPOKANE. COUNT`' ENGINEER 151 I am sure that you are aware of the interconnection of the two above projects- At the urging and suggestion of the Office of the Count Engineer; we'decided that it might he cost effective to,fprgoe the construction of the drainage pond, as planned, in R -I.D. 418. {: Its function would:then be. performed by a similar structure, to be constructed in \connection with'Guthrie's Mica View First Addition The few months have caused us to reassess this situation. We these two projects will cause fi .delays to both that are` unacceptable.... We wish all construction on R.I.D. 418 to begin at the soonest possible moment. We feel that the money saved by combining the functions of drainage structures for both of the projects, Will be offset by money lost „in delays, that have occurred and will continue to occur. It is time to let each stand alone. It is unfortunate that this is the case, but it is time to. clear the too - muddied waters. We Think that by` letting,each project proceed by•itself;'R.1.D 413 can.be completed at a much earlier date. The - demands, of your'office for extensive information with regards'. to Mica View Estates prior to even the preliminary approval of this project, make it paramoun•that these two plats be divorced from each other. If you have any • feel free to contact me Very truly yours, .. 'HEALTH CARE FACILITIES . ° MULTI- FAMILY AND RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION SPOKANE Cowin. COON, 'OUSE Guthrie Investment, Inc. E. 9211 Trent Spokane, WA 99206 ' Dear Sir: VS /set Very truly yours, uI ri en uY COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER S oa%NE ,1V1nniNOTON 99260 February 12, 1986 ATTN: Art Noll RE: RID 418, Ponderosa Drive in Valley Vista Estates As you requested, we have investigated the possibility of including, in the present Road Improvement District, a cost to participate in the future con— struction of a stormwater retention facility to be constructed in conjunction with future proposed plat development. Our legal advisors believe that such assessment charge is possible. A constraint on the sale of bonds to finance this future work is that the funds reserved must be spent for the purpose designated within three years from the bond sale. In order to include a proportionate charge for this work in the present District, we need to know the estimated cost of the facility and the total property proposed to contribute to the cost. The simplest method of distri— buting the cost is on a per lot basis, using the total number of lots proposed to be developed, including the 12 lots in the present Plat of Valley Vista Estates and spreading the cost of the facility equally amongst them. If you haven't already done so, you will need to obtain a detailed estimate of the cost of construing the facility, including engineering and furnish that cost estimate and proposed number of lots to share in the cost to this office for review and, if appropriate, for inclusion in the present RID. Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Verril Sm le Engineers g Administrator Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 156.3600 Inter - office Communication To Verril Smale, Robert Turner From 1 Ga n ( No con Subject *, It appears tion indicated, insure the lots a need to do an that the stream the railroad. GSN /set OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 11..... D 4..f.. n DC 1407 ....A A,.n..,.4..t,.A DTn Date rrrnh,r 7 19 RS I recently reviewed Guthrie's Valley Vista Estates - PE 1407 and its associated RID which includes a detention pond located in the natural area which Mr. Guthrie "donated" to Spokane County. As you know, this detention pond is on hold by the County Engineer pending a decision to build an alternate detention pond in the area where the creek flows under the railroad. Mr. Guthrie has also proposed another plat in this area called Guth - rie's Mica View Estates 1st - PE 1513. that it would be feasible to construct a detention pond in the loca- however, there may be a need to do considerable grading in order to of Mica View Estates 1st - PE 1513, are not affected. There would be overall drainage plan for all of Guthrie's ownership to determine could handle the increased flows and to size the detention pond at Ind I propose we offer to allow Guthrie to delete the detention pond from the RID and drain directly to the stream, provided Guthrie agrees to do a basinwide drainage plan to include the concerns mentioned in this memo, prior to any further platting in this basin. ll SPOYANC COUNTY COURTHOUSE Srco !ii ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 RECEIVED SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 I- a 1$ 140 Rai VMS February 4, 1986 ✓Spokane County Engineer's Office Spokane County Utilities Department RECEIVED Spokane County Environmental Health Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 8 FEB. 5 1986 Thomas G. Mosher, Environmental Coordinator, Spokane County Central Valley School District #356 S POI COUNPI ENGINEER Spokane Suburban Water Co. WA State Department of Game, Regional Office WA State Department of Transportation RE: PE- 1513 -85, ZE -77 -85 GUTHRIE MICA VIEW ESTATES 1ST ADDITION Dear Sirs: In October of last year the Planning Department was requested to consider the above named plat. Requests were made from different departments and agencies asking to see an overall concept plan for-the ownership of the sponsor and as a result the hearing was delayed. The sponsor has prepared a general development concept plan for the area, particularly showing likely road networks, and has submitted a Narrative Review to explain possible future development in the area in relation to Guthrie Mica View Estates 1st Addition. I would appreciate any comments on e Concept focusing particularly,on the environmental impacts of the prososal by February 24, 1986. Thank you for your prompt atte tion. DA /vr cerely, DOUGLAS S. ADAMS Subdivision Administrator Attachments: Guthrie Mica View Estates 1st Add. Application Environmental Checklist Narrative Review and "Master Plan" Robert Turner, Spokane County Engineer Spokane County Engineer's Office N 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 Re: Valley Vista Estates drainage structures. Dear Mr. Turner: D.received your letter of October 17, 1985, concerning:alarge drainage "pond" to be constructed in conjuction with R.I.D. 418 in my plat of Valley Vista Estates. I think that your idea to forgo construction of this particular structure at the present time, and instead build an alternative structure further downstream in conjuction with Guthrie's Mice View Estates First Addition ( P.E. - 1513 -85) is an excellant one. You suggest that this new "pond" be designed in conjuction with an area wide drainage study. I understand that much of this work has already been done in the design phases of the original "pond ". I don't think that too much additional data will be needed to design this new structure. I am all in favor of following your suggestion and will cooperate with your office in this matter. Very truly yours, SPOKANE Ralph Guthrie, President Guthrie Investments GI GUTHRIE INVESTMENT, INC. NI)\ ( ',f. Q S'. / 5 mo 1 o» • U I S BELLEVUE RECEIVED DEC 0 4 1985 SPOKANa COUNTY ENGINEER LAND DEVELOPMENT • HEALTH CARE FACILITIES • MULTI - FAMILY AND RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 84 0042 IN THE MATTER OF ) ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 373 ) R e s o l u t i o n IMPROVEMENT OF PONDEROSA DRIVE ) COUNTY ROAD FILE NO. 2581 ) WHEREAS, Spokane County has completed the improvement of Ponderosa Drive under Road Improvement District No. 373; and WHEREAS, the adjacent landowner had requested and received approval by the Board . of County Commissioners for adjustments in the assessment against certain properties in the District which properties are to be designated as public natural areas; and WHEREAS, an agreement has been prepared setting forth the conditions for adjust- ment of assessments and the designation of the natural areas and the County Engineer recommends approval of the agreement by Spokane County. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington that the agreement between Spokane County and Ralph Guthrie con- cerning the adjustment in assessments for RID No. 373 and designation of natural area is hereby approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Wash- ington, this 17th day of January, 1984. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE RK OF THE BOARD BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 84 0042 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this /7 day of 19_1 by and between RALPH GUTHRIE, hereinafter referred to as the "Grantor" and SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, herein— after referred to as the "Grantee ", jointly referred to as the "Parties ". WITNESSETH For and in consideration of the covenants herein contained, the GRANTOR hereby agrees to convey to the GRANTEE the following described property situ— ated in Spokane County, Washington, to —wit: Those portions of the following described land lying Northerly of the proposed road as shown on the map attached hereto and by re— ference made a part hereof. Government Lot 8 in the Northwest Quarter (NWT) of Section 4, Town— ship 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M. EXCEPT that portion lying North and West of Ponderosa Drive and also EXCEPT Short Plat No. 78 -042. Government Lot 9 in the Northwest Quarter (NW's) of Section 4, Town — ship 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M.; EXCEPT that portion lying Easter— ly of the Plat Ponderosa Hills and Northerly of the existing dirt easement road to properties West of the GRANTORS Ownership. The East Half (E') of Government Lot 10 in the Northeast Quarter (NE's) of Section 5, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M.: EXCEPT that portion in the plat of Ponderosa Hills. As consideration for the conveyance, the PARTIES agree as follows: 1. The GRANTOR shall be responsible for all surveying and engineering service necessary to formalize the final conveyance. 2. The GRANTOR shall execute and deliver to the GRANTEE a Warranty Deed conveying fee simple title. 3. The GRANTEE shall not be responsible for any cost associated with the construction of the road that constitutes the Southerly boundary of the afore — described lands. 4. It is agreed by the PARTIES hereto that the distribution of the assess— ment for Road Improvements on Ponderosa Drive under County Road Improvement Dis— trict No. 373 against Parcel No. 04442 -9078 in the total amount of $12,193.48 shall be shared as follows: $2,376.20 shall be assessed against the said parcel following the normal RID process; $4,908.64 shall be distributed amongst the other properties in. the District; $4,908.64 shall be due and owing from the GRANTOR to Spokane County upon the development of the remainder of said Parcel No. 04442 -9078 due and payable before final approval of any plat or other development of the said parcel. It 84 0042 5. The GRANTEE shall have no responsibility to develop the lands being conveyed. It is the desire of the PARTIES to leave the area in its native con- dition; however, Spokane County will, by permit, allow the Grantor to place upon the lands to be conveyed a storm water storage pond and appurtenant facil- ities as approved by the County Engineer. All installation and maintenance cost to be the sole responsibility of the Grantor. 6. The PARTIES agree that the convenants set forth herein shall be final- ized within 12 months of the date of this agreement. This agreement may be extended by mutual consent of the parties. If the agreement is extended, the Grantor shall pay, in addition to the $4,908.64 set forth in paragraph 4, interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum on said sum from the date of this agreement. 7. This agreement shall insure to the benefit of and be binding on the heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the PARTIES. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands the day and year above written. APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ss DATE scar r G1"i 1 C OUNTY I SS I ERS SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON • On this day personally appeared before me known to be the individual described here n w o executed the wit in any ore - going instrument and acknowledged that //1/4 signed the same as Mf free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and seal this f day of Notary • -- 'lic in Washington, Residing Washington. , 19d . nd fo / he State of Spokane, SUB AREA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (max) Area in Acres �� Runoff Coefficient 7a DATE NAME DESCRIPTION VP. //Ewl ;; TA E -ST — 1 4-g-fe • l BASIN NAME # of Sub Areas /- /o--? Er Ls BASIN INPUT DATA Rainfall (inches) Hydraulic Length (feet) /3 0 0 Watershed Slope (percent Travel Time (hours) 9/10/84 Q HYDROGRAPH DESIGN PROGRAM INPUT FORM 7, 3 DESIGN q pr / 4( 5 fir` 1, ` 7 3 3 cl /33, ?7 s o SUB AREA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (max) Area in Acres II Runoff Coefficient 7 NAME DESCRIPTION BASIN NAME # of Sub Areas 9/10/84 V DATE /— /O ' U,f R - A -21 HYDROGRAPH DESIGN PROGRAM INPUT FORM BASIN INPUT DATA / Rainfall (inches) a L Hydraulic Length (feet) 1350 Watershed Slope (percent /0,7 Travel Time (hours) 0-3 DESIGN Q 25 ,72 S 'J I' ) L L 34 9(4 -7 , b-a DATE NAME 9/10/84 HYDROGRAPH DESIGN PROGRAM INPUT FORM DESCRIPTION BASIN NAME C /"\ r i of Sub Areas DESIGN Q s o BASIN INPUT DATA / Rainfall (inches) ) ' Y Hydraulic Length (feet) I3.5 Watershed Slope (percent //'0 Travel Time (hours) - cJ4 - k 5 ' 0 Q 3 2t34 7ffi- vNt /14 . °9 ( 'A v SUB AREA 1 2 3 4 5 6 N. ' 8 9 ' 10 (mak) Area in Acres 13 5 Runoff Coefficient DATE NAME 9/10/84 HYDROGRAPH DESIGN PROGRAM INPUT FORM DESCRIPTION BASIN NAME C /"\ r i of Sub Areas DESIGN Q s o BASIN INPUT DATA / Rainfall (inches) ) ' Y Hydraulic Length (feet) I3.5 Watershed Slope (percent //'0 Travel Time (hours) - cJ4 - k 5 ' 0 Q 3 2t34 7ffi- vNt /14 . °9 ( 'A v SUB AREA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (max) Area in Acres I3 S Runoff Coefficient / 6 (-, DATE NAME DESCRIPTION BASIN NAME # of Sub Areas • / ; BASIN INPUT DATA Hydraulic Length (feet) 350 Watershed Slope (percent 1/ Rainfall (inches) Travel Time (hours) 9/10/84 c — 8 e -role -e HYDROGRAPH DESIGN PROGRAM INPUT FORM DESIGN q 0O / l'( L/ 5 �lJ - ,c 9- „ a/ 36 i SUB AREA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (max) Area in Acres ' 3/,S Runoff Coefficient N 4 6 - DATE ,NAME . DESCRIPTION BASIN NAME :J :BASIN INPUT DATA Rainfall (inches) Hydraulic Length (feet) Watershed Slope (percent Travel Time (hours) 347 9/10/84 Ens is' ( A 4 tsorr c 3 HYDROGRAPH DESIGN PROGRAM INPUT FORM N of Sub Areas (' a.II . -_. ass o 1/-6 DESIGN q /f op ash // O C a5 a 0 23 / 31 o 0 RST /set cc: ` Jim, Haines Verril Smale' `Gary,•.Ne Isom:. • 4 October 17,,•.1985_ Ralph Guthrie' East.92 11 '.Trent Spokane, WA' 99206 'RE:' RID; 418, Valley Vista Est. .PE -Dear Mr: Guthrie We are. currently contracting RID 418.. for the, road improvements do Valley Vista Estates.' These, improvements include:.a detention pond in :the low 'area. ,.next Wthe creek, however,. we have puta•temporary hold on the pond's con - struction:, We' propose to allow the pond to be deleted and. to allow the plat to drain directly into, the; creek;. provided we have ,agreement fron,you to do a basinwide drainage. plan tar ., your• entire' ownership prior to'any further platting. ',This . basinwid'e drainage plan should consider` feasibility of one single deten tion the :basin, located at'the downstream end adjacent to the rail= roed. The plan` should• also. consider the ability of the creek upstrea ©'.from, the detention pond to'carry'this flow. The intent. is to reduce •the overall ' cost'of construction and' maintenancerof•the drainage facilities'and to keep the creek property,in as natural a: condition. as possible. :The end result should be beneficial to all and I hope you will concur in this concept.' • Please•respond soon so that we canzmake the appropriate modifications to our RID contract. If you have any questions; please. contact Gary. Nelson. Very ` truly yours', Robert S. Turner, - P.E. Spokane' County ,.Engineer DATE = 01/10/85 DESIGNER= G. NELSON BASIN A BEFORE DESCRIPTION= VALLEY VISTA ESTATES P.E. 1407 SUBAREA 1 = 22 ACRES SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER = 66 TOTAL AREA = 22 ACRES COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER = 66.00 BASIN INPUT DATA CALCULATED VALUES TABULAR HYDROGRAPH RAINFALL = 2.4 INCHES HYDRAULIC LENGTH = 1300 FEET WATERSHED SLOPE = 7.3 PERCENT TRAVEL TIME = 0 HOURS S = 5.15 Q = .29 INCHES LAG = .22 HOURS Tc = .36 HOURS VOLUME = 21,944.33 C.F. MAX RUNOFF = 5.93 C.F.S. HOURS RUNOFF IN C.F.S. . 10.0 11.0 11.5 11.70 11.80 11.90 12.00 12.10 12.20 12.30 12.40 12.50 12.60 12.70 12.80 12.90 13.00 13.2 13.50 14.00 14.50 15.00 16.0 18.0 20.0 24.0 0.00 .20 . 40 1.17 2.62 4.82 5.93 5 4.14 2.95 2.19 1.71 1.41 1.15 . 96 . 84 . 75 . 63 «, .41 . 34 . 30 . 24 . 18 ' . 18 0.00 HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV ABEF HYDROGRAPH DESIGN S.C.S. TR -55 METHOD DATE= 01/10/85 DESCRIPTION= VALLEY VISTA ESTATES P.E. 1407 SUBAREA 1 = 13 ACRES TOTAL AREA = 13 ACRES BASIN INPUT DATA CALCULATED VALUES TABULAR HYDROGRAPH RAINFALL = 2.4 INCHES HYDRAULIC LENGTH = 1350 FEET WATERSHED SLOPE = 10.7 PERCENT TRAVEL TIME = .04 HOURS S = 5.15 0 = .29 INCHES LAG = .18 HOURS Tc = .31 HOURS VOLUME = 12,973.20 C.F. MAX RUNOFF = 3.46 C.F.S. HOURS RUNOFF IN C.F.S. 10.0 ().00 11.0 .12 11"5 .24 11.70 .72 11.80 1"63 11.90 2"96 12.00 3^46 12.10 3.06 12.20 2.37 12,30 1.75 12.40 1.32 12.50 1.04 12.60 .84 12.70 .68 12.80 .56 12.90 .49 13.00 .44 13.2 .37 13"50 .31 14.00 .24 14^5O "20 15.00 .18 16.0 .14 18.0 .11 20"0 .11 24.0 0.00 HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV BBEF HYDROGRAPH DESIGN S.C.S. TR-55 METHOD DESIGNER= G. NELSON BASIN BEFORE SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER = 66 COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER = 66,00 r f OF% VS, TIME 7 11.8 12.1 12.3 12.5 12.7 12.9 13.2 14 15 TTHF ltd HrUIPF B BEFORE DATE= 01/10/85 SUBAREA 1 = 13.5 ACRES TOTAL AREA = 13.5 ACRES BASIN INPUT DATA CALCULATED VALUES TABULAR HYDROGRAPH S = 5.15 Q = .29 INCHES LAG = .17 HOURS Tc = . 29 HOURS VOLUME = 13,451.94 C.F. MAX RUNOFF = 3.40 C.F.S. HOURS RUNOFF IN C.F.S. 10.0 0.00 11.0 .10 11.5 .19 11.70 .28 11.80 .47 11.90 .93 12.00 1.83 12.10 2.88 12.20 3.40 12.30 3.14 12.40 2.51 12.50 1.86 12.60 1.37 12.70 1.05 12.80 ^ "84 12.90 .69 13.00 .58 13.2 .46 13^50 .35 14.00 .27 14.50 .22 15.00 .19 16.0 .15 18.0 .11 20.0 .11 24.0 0.00 HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV CBEF HYDROGRAPH DESIGN S.C.S. TR-55 METHOD DESCRIPTION= VALLEY VISTA ESTATES P.E. 1407 DESIGNER= G. NELSON BASIN C BEFORE RAINFALL = 2.4 INCHES HYDRAULIC LENGTH = 1350 FEET WATERSHED SLOPE = 11.8 PERCENT TRAVEL TIME = .243 HOURS SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER .= 66' COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER = 66"00 4 i 1 -. F S TIME 0 18 11 1f .7 L1,9 12.1 12,3 12,3 12.7 12,5 13,2 14 15 13 4 TThF ltd HTIIIB4 C BEFORE DATE= 01/10/85 DESCRIPTION= VALLEY VISTA ESTATES P.E- 1407 SUBAREA 4 = 31.5 ACRES TOTAL AREA = 31.5 ACRES BASIN INPUT DATA CALCULATED VALUES RAINFALL = 2.4 INCHES HYDRAULIC LENGTH = 2150 FEET WATERSHED SLOPE = 11.6 PERCENT TRAVEL TIME = .36 HOURS , TABULAR HYDROGRAPH. S = 5.15 Q = .29 INCHES LAG = "26 HOURS Tc = . 43 HOURS VOLUME = 31,364"68 C.F. MAX RUNOFF = 5.95 C.F.S. HOURS RUNOFF IN C.F.S. 10.0 0.00 '11"0 .19 11.5 .34 11.70 .46 ' 11.80 °61 11:90 1.00 12.00 1.84 12^10 3,17 12.20 4.58 42^3O 5.59 12^40 5.95 12.50 5.76 12.60 5.12 12.70 4.34 12.80 3.57 12.90 2.91 13.00 2.37 13.2 1.64 13"50 1,08 14.00 .72 14.50 .57 15.00 . .48 16.0 .37 18.0 .27 20.0 .27 24"0 0.00 HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV DBEF HYDROGRAPH DESIGN S.C.S. TR-55 METHOD DESIGNER= G. NELSON BASIN D BEFORE - SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER = 66 COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER = 66"00 CFS VS, TIME L1.9 12.1 12.3 12.5 12.7 12.5 13.2 7IhE IN HOURS Ci BEFORE DATE = 01/10/85 DESCRIPTION= VALLEY VISTA ESTATES P.E. 1407 SUBAREA 1 = 6.2 ACRES TOTAL AREA = 6.2 ACRES BASIN INPUT DATA CALCULATED VALUES TABULAR HYDROGRAPH HYDROGRAPH DESIGN S.C.S. TR -55 METHOD DESIGNER= G. NELSON BASIN E BEFORE RAINFALL = 2.4 INCHES HYDRAULIC LENGTH = 1100 FEET WATERSHED SLOPE = 13.6 PERCENT TRAVEL TIME = .45 HOURS S = 5.15 0 = .29 INCHES LAG = .14 HOURS Tc = . 23 HOURS VOLUME = 6,172.17 C.F. MAX RUNOFF = 1.38 C.F.S. HOURS RUNOFF IN C.F.S. 10.0 0.00 11.0 .04 11.5 .07 11.70 .10 11.80 .13 11.90 .21 12.00 .39 12.10 .68 12.20 1.03 12.30 1.30 12.40 1.38 12.50 1.25 12.60 1.03 12.70 .79 12.80 .60 12.90 .46 17.00 .37 13.2 .26 13.50 .19 14.00 .13 14.50 .11 15.00 .09 16.0 .07 18.0 .05 20.0 .05 24.0 0.00 HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV EBEF ADD.VV DBEF ADD VV CBEF ADD VV BBEF ADD VV ABEF SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER = 66 COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER = 66.00 HYDROGRAPH DESIGN S.C.S. TR -55 METHOD DATE= 01/10/85 DESIGNER= G. NELSON THIS IS THE SUM OF HYDROGRAPHS VV EBEF + VV DBEF + VV CBEF + VV BBEF + VV ABEF CALCULATED VALUES TABULAR HYDROGRAPH VOLUME = 85,906.32 C.F. MAX RUNOFF = 15.50 C.F.S. HOURS RUNOFF IN C.F.S. 10.0 0.00 11.0 .66 11.5 1.25 11.70 2.73 11.80 5.45 11.90 9.91 12.00 13.45 12.10 15.32 12.20 15.50 12.30 14.72 12.40 13.34 12.50 11.61 12,60 9.75 12.70 8.01 12.80 6.54 12.90 5.39 13.00 4.51 13.2 3.35 13.50 2.44 14.00 1.78 14.50 1.44 15.00 1.23 16.0 .98 18.0 .71 20.0 .71 24.0 0.00 21 18 15 12 h .5 CFS 'vi'i. T I M E J' ° ill J fi 11.7 11.9 1.2.1 12.3 f .5 12.7 12. 13.2 14 15 id ~ 9 1THG iN 47roun; E BEFORE SUB AREA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (max) Area in Acres �� Runoff - Coefficient II ‘ p DATE NAME / -/0 -es BASIN NAME NFL 5n HYDROGRAPH DESIGN PROGRAM INPUT FORM DESCRIPTION VA LL F v 1/;<779 L S 0 of Sub Areas BASIN INPUT DATA ':.Rainfall (inches) ‘,)-, ( I Hydraulic Length (feet) /3 e O !Watershed Slope (percent 7, 3 Travel Time (hours) d 9/10/84 Vv/ /GAG Si tk a2 9-? y, 7/ DESIGN q S© P r. Ho) SUB AREA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (max) Area in Acres 13 Runoff -Coefficient D DATE BASIN'INPUT DATA 9/10/84 Rainfall (inches) 5nl ta 3, Y xol G.SAV Yc( "cSa /35 7J, 9-6 HYDROGRAPH DESIGN PROGRAM INPUT FORM a, LI Hydraulic Length (feet) 13S Watershed Slope (percent / 0 ,— ) Travel Time (hours) O ti DESIGN q S 0 NAME Et, / / tso /- DESCRIPTION VALLr V/s7A Y C,fj ,E BASIN NAME f of Sub Areas /5 0 3 iv _ Ft /S-e- _ -/S Sew_ DATE = 01/10/85 DESIGNER= G. NELSON BASIN A AFTER DESCRIPTION= VALLEY VISTA ESTATES F.E. 1407 SUBAREA 1 = ACRES SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER = 72 TOTAL AREA = BASIN INPUT DATA CALCULATED VALUES TABULAR HYDROGRAPH RAINFALL = 2.4 INCHES HYDRAULIC LENGTH = 1.300 FEET WATERSHED SLOPE = 7.3 PERCENT TRAVEL TIME = 0 HOURS S = 3.89 0 = .48 INCHES LAG = .18 HOURS Tc = .31 HOURS VOLUME = 36,453.55 C.F. MAX RUNOFF = 10.71 C.F.S. HOURS 10.0 11.0 11.5 11.70 11.80 11.90 12.00 12.10 12.20 12.30 12.40 12.50 12.60 12.70 12.80 12.90 13.00 13.2 13.50 14.00 14.50 15.00 16.0 18.0 20.0 24.0 22 ACRES RUNOFF IN C.F.S. 0.00 .34 . 70 2.28 C !1 9.47 10.71 8.82 6.18 4.19 3.08 2.47 2.06 1.70 1.43 1.28 1.17 1.01 . 84 . 67 . 56 .49 .39 . 70 .30 0.00 HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV AAFT HYDROGRAPH DESIGN S.C.S. TR -55 METHOD COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER = 72.00 Ay28-4 rdA i-Yr4 e,q3 // b&siEN cM DATE= 01/10/85 DESCRIPTION= VALLEY VISTA ESTATES P.E. 1407 SUBAREA 1 = 13 ACRES TOTAL AREA = 13 ACRES BASIN INPUT DATA CALCULATED VALUES TABULAR HYDROGRAPH DESIGNER= G. NELSON BASIN B AFTER RAINFALL = 2.4 INCHES HYDRAULIC LENGTH = 1350 FEET WATERSHED SLOPE = 10.7 PERCENT TRAVEL TIME = .03 HOURS S = 3.70 Q = .51 INCHES LAG = .15 HOURS Tc = .25 HOURS VOLUME = 23,241.77 C.F. MAX RUNOFF = 6.50 C.F.S. HOURS RUNOFF IN C.F.S. 10.0 0.00 11.0 .22 11.5 .45 11.70 1.64 11.80 3.88 11.90 6.50 12.0o 6^41 12"10 5"10 12.20 3.61 12.30 2.60 12.40 1.98 12.50 1.59 12.60 1.31 12.70 1.06 12^80 .91 ' 12.90 ^82 13.00 .75 13.2 .63 13"50 "53 14.00 .43 14.50 .36 15.00 .31 16.0 "25' 18.0 .19 20.0 .19 24.0 . 0.00 HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV BAFT HYDROGRAPH DESIGN S.C.S. TR-55 METHOD SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER = 73 COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER = 73"00 DATE= 01/10/85 DESCRIPTION= VALLEY VISTA ESTATES P.E. 1407 SUBAREA 1 = 13.5 ACRES TOTAL AREA = 13.5 ACRES BASIN INPUT DATA CALCULATED VALUES TABULAR HYDROGRAPH HYDROGRAPH DESIGN S.C.S. TR-55 METHOD DESIGNER= G. NELSON BASIN C AFTER RAINFALL = 2.4 INCHES HYDRAULIC LENGTH = 1350 FEET WATERSHED SLOPE = 11.8 PERCENT TRAVEL TIME = .043 HOURS S = 3.70 Q = .51 INCHES LAG = .14 HOURS Tc = .24 'HOURS VOLUME = 24,143.97 C.F. MAX RUNOFF = 6.70 C.F.S. HOURS RUNOFF IN C.F.S. 10.0 0.00 11.0 .23 11.5 .47 11.70 1.71 11.80 4.04 11.90 6.70 12.00 6.50 12.10 5"23 12.20 3.79 12.30 2.77 17°40 2.11 12.50 1.69 12.60 1.38 12.70 1.11 12.80 .95 12.90 .85 13.00 .79 13.2 .66 13.50 .55 14.00 .44 14.50 .37 15.00 .32 16.0 .26 18.0 .20 20.0 .20 24"O 0.00 HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV CAFT SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER = 73 COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER = 73.00 DATE= 01/10/85 DESCRIPTION= VALLEY VISTA ESTATES 1407 . SUBAREA 1 = 31.5 ACRES TOTAL AREA = 31.5 ACRES BASIN INPUT DATA CALCULATED VALUES TABULAR HYDROGRAPH RAINFALL = 2.4 INCHES HYDRAULIC LENGTH = 2150 FEET WATERSHED SLOPE = 11.6 PERCENT TRAVEL TIME = .07 HOURS S = 3.70 0 = .51 INCHES LAG = .21 HOURS Tc = .35 HOURS VOLUME = 56,170.11 C.F. MAX RUNOFF = 12.96 C.F.S. HOURS RUNOFF IN C.F.S. 10"0 0.00 11.0 .49 11.5 .95 11.70 2.49 11.80 5.37 11.90 9.90 12.00 12.71 12.10 12.96 12.20 11.16 12.30 9.02 12.40 7.13 12.50 5.59 12.60 4.44 12.70 3.55 12.80 2.90 12.90 2.46 13.00 2.15 13.2 1.74 13.50 1.39 14.00 1.08 14.50 .90 15.00 .77 16.0 .62 18.0 .46 20.0 .46 24.0 0.00 HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV DAFT HYDROGRAPH DESIGN S.C.S. TR-55 METHOD DESIGNER= G. NELSON BASIN D AFTER SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER = '73 COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER = 73.00 DATE = 01 /10/85 DESCRIPTION= VALLEY VISTA ESTATES P.E. 1407 SUBAREA 1 = 6.2 ACRES TOTAL AREA = 6.2 ACRES BASIN INPUT DATA CALCULATED VALUES TABULAR HYDROGRAPH DESIGNER= G. NELSON BASIN E AFTER RAINFALL = 2.4 INCHES HYDRAULIC LENGTH = 1100 FEET WATERSHED SLOPE = 13.6 PERCENT TRAVEL TIME = .08 HOURS S = 3.70 Q = .51 INCHES LAG = .11 HOURS Tc = .19 HOURS VOLUME = 11,101.04 C.F. MAX RUNOFF = 3.01 C.F.S. HOURS RUNOFF IN C.F.S. 10.0 C).00 11.0 .11 11.5 .22 11.70 .81 11.80 2.03 11.90 3.01 12.00 2.82 12.10 2. 12.20 1.79 12.30 1.32 12.40 .99 12.50 .77 12.60 .62 12.70 .50 12.80 .43 12.90 .39 1.7.00 .36 17.2 .30 13.50 .25 14.00 .20 14.50 .17 15.00 .15 16.0 .12 18.0 .09 20.0 .09 24.0 0.00 HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV EAFT ADD VV DAFT ADD VV CAFT ADD VV BAFT nnn VV AAC:T HYDROGRAPH DESIGN S.C.S. TR -55 METHOD SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER = 73 COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER = 73.00 HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV ABCDE AFT HYDROGRAPH DESIGN S.C.S. TR -55 METHOD DATE= 01/10/85 DESIGNER= G. NELSON DESCRIPTION= VALLEY VISTA ESTATES P.E. 1407 THIS IS THE SUM OF HYDROGRAPHS VV ABCDE AFT SUBAREA 1 = 6.2 ACRES SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER = 73 TOTAL AREA = 6.2 ACRES COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER = 73.00 BASIN INPUT DATA CALCULATED VALUES TABULAR HYDROGRAPH RAINFALL = 2.4 INCHES HYDRAULIC LENGTH = 1100 FEET WATERSHED SLOPE = 13.6 PERCENT TRAVEL TIME = .08 HOURS S = 3.70 0 = .51 INCHES LAG = .11 HOURS Tc = .19 HOURS VOLUME = 151,110.43 C.F. MAX RUNOFF = 39.14 C.F.S. HOURS RUNOFF IN C.F.S. 10.0 0.00 11.0 1.39 11.5 2.79 11.70 8.94 11.80 20.56 11.90 35.58 12.00 39. 14 12.10 34.47 12.20 26.52 12.30 19.89 12.40 15.28 12.50 12.11 12.60 9.81 12.70 7.93 12.80 6.62 12.90 5.79 13.00 5 .22 13.2 4.33 13.50 3.56 14.00 2:83 14.50 2.36 15.00 2.05 16.0 1.65 18.0 1.23 20.0 1.23 24.0 0.00 * * ** STORM WATER HYDROLOGY * * ** Retention /Detention Basin Design INFLOW FROM FILE VV ABODE AFT INFLOW VOLUME = 151110.43 cf POND w/ SLOPED SIDES BASE = 215 ., 20 SLOPE = 5 RETENTION H OUTLETS: 8.79 ft SUBMERGED ORIFICE HEIGHT = -2.00 ft DIAM = - 14.00 in MAX DISCHARGE = 13.16 cfs BASIN VOL. = 40710.20 cf BASIN DEPTH = 4.17 ft TIME INFLOW OUTFLOW cfs cfs 0:10 0:20 0:30 0:40 0:50 1 :00 '1:10 1:20 1:30 1:40 1:5C0 2 :00 2:10 2 :20 2:30 2:40 2:50 3:00 3:10 3: 3:30 3:40 3:50 4 :00 4:10 4:20 4:30 4:40 0.23 0.46 0.70 0.93 1.16 1.39 1.86 2.33 2.79 7.92 25.57 39.14 29.17 18.35 12.11 8.56 6.34 5 .22 4.48 3.99 3.56 3.32 3.08 2.83 2.68 2.52 2.36 2.25 0.07 0.31 0.54 0.77 1.00 1.23 1.54 2.02 2.49 4.34 8.18 10..32 12.13 12.92 13.16 13.12 12.94 12.66 12.30 11.89 11.42 10.88 10.26 9.5._ 8. 66 5.01 2. JJ 2.32 5:00 5:10 5:20 5:30 5:40 5:50 6:00 6:10 6 :20 6:30 6:40 6:50 7:00 7:10 7:20 7:30 7:40 7:50 8:00 8:10 8:20 8:30 8:40 8:50 9:00 9:10 9:20 9:30 9:40 9:50 10:00 10:10 10 :20 10 :30 10:40 10:50 11:001 11:10 11:20 11:30 11:40 11:50 12 :00 12:10 12: 2C' 12:30 12:40 12:50 13:00 13 :10 13:20 13:30 13:40 13:50 14:00 iv 1 2.05 1.98 1.91 1.85 1-, 78 1.71 1.65 1.61 1.58 1.54 1.51 1.47 1.44 1.40 1.37 1.33 1.30 1.26 1.23 1.21 1.18 1.16 1.14 1.12 1.10 1.07 1.05 1.03 1.01 0.99 0.96 0.92 0.88 0.84 0.80 0.76 0.72 0.68 0.64 0.60 0.56 0.52 0.48 0.44 0.40 0.36 0.32 0.28 0.24 0.20 0.16 0.12 0.08 0.04 0.00 2.12 2.03 1.96 1.89 1.82' .1.76 1.69 1.6° 1.61 1.56 1.54 1.49 1.46 1.42 1.40 1.35 1.33 1.28 1.26 1.22 1.20 1.17 1.15 1.13 1.11 1.09 1.06 1.04 1.02 1.00 0.98 0.95 0.91 0.87 0.83 0.79 0.75 0.71 0.67 0.63 0.60 0.55 0.51 0.47 0.42 0.39 0.35 0.30 0.27 0.22 0.19 0.14 0.11 0.06 0.03. VS /set L P 4 h TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: cc: Traffic Engineering ® ov1 UY COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER St onavr: ,Wativavtrrox 99260 July 3, 1985 RE: Valley Acres Estates No. 1162 Rosewood Avenue, Rd. File No. 2615 Rosewood Avenue, in the Plat of Valley Acres Estates, has been estab— lished as a County road by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County. Spokane County has assumed the responsibility for routine maintenance of this road. A concern has been raised about potential speeding on this road and the possibility of placing "speed bumps" on the roadway. Spokane County cannot and will not allow speed bumps on a public road due to the high liabil— ity exposure. Rosewood Avenue is not significantly different than many other County residential roads with a lengthy tangent alignment. Rosanne Avenue in Moab Meadows Is a comparative example (see map). Once the properties have developed, a residential speed limit of 25 MPH can be requested and once approved, posted and enforced. Very truly yours, Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane Count Weer rl Verril .i'ale Engineering Administrator Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3600 iP Y 4. 1[Il ,;I,t r SPO..NC CoU,rr C.Cgr .CUSC Ralph Guthrie East 9211 Trent Spokane, WA 99206 Dear Mr. Guthrie: RST /set cc: Jim Haines Verril Smale Gary Nelson Sipco co ThC T1 IE 'C o wrr"ri`r Very :t 0 FYIC a OF COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER Svo8%xE ,WA ui\OTON 99260 October 17, 1985 RE: RID 418, Valley Vista Est. PE 1407 We are currently contracting RID 418 for the road improvements in Valley Vista Estates. These improvements include a detention pond in the low area next to the creek, however, we have put a temporary hold on the pond's con- struction. We propose to allow the pond to be deleted and to allow the plat to drain directly into the creek, provided we have agreement from you to do a basinwide drainage plan for your entire ownership prior to any further platting. This basinwide drainage plan should consider the feasibility of one single deten- tion pond for the basin, located at the downstream end adjacent to the rail- road. The plan should also consider the ability of the creek upstream from the detention pond to carry this flow. The intent is to reduce the overall cost of construction and maintenance of the drainage facilities and to keep the creek property in as natural a condition as possible. The end result should be beneficial to all and I hope you will concur in this concept. Please respond soon so that we can make the appropriate modifications to our RID contract. If you have any questions, please contact Gary Nelson. rs, G-v1/1 R ert '6. urner, P.E. S okane County Engineer Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3600 Wail; 4 I. IC kr.HSE AUGi;ca :,SPUME COUSIY. WASH. BEPUTY, STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Res Court House xxx THE GRANTOR, Ralph D. Guthrie and Gertrude O. Guthrie, husband and wife, for and in consideration of mutual benefits, in hand paid, conveys to SPOKANE COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, the following described real estate, situated in the COUNTY of SPOKANE, State of Washington: A portion of land in Government Lot 9, in Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M., Spokane, County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 9; thence North 00 ° 40'12" West along the West line of said Section 4, a distance of 650.99 feet to the True Point of Beginning for this description. Said point being a point of a Non - Tangent curve having a Radial Bearing South 4 10'39" East; thence along a curve to the right (having a Delta 8 ° 28'03" and a Radius of 440.00 feet) 65.03 feet; thence South 85 ° 42'36" East a distance of 545.76 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a Delta of 50 and a Radius of 380.00 feet) 332.69 feet; thence North 44 07'40" East a distance of 365.66 feet to a point of a curve; thence along a curve to the left (having a Delta 26 02'31" and a Radius 380.00 feet) 172.72 feet; thence North 18 ° 05'09" East a distance of 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 7 07'47" and a Radius 440.00 feet) 54.75 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve. Said point having a Radial Bearing North 64 ° 47'04" West; thence South 81 ° 17'57" West a distance 34.61 feet to a point uf a curve; thence un a curve to the left (having a Delta 21 and a Radius 135.00 feet) 50.21 feet; thence South 59 59'17" West a distance 125.94 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the left (having a Delta 36 10'42" and a Radius 135.00 feet) 85.24 feet; thence South 23 ° 48'35" West a distance 39.35 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 32 and a Radius 230.00 feet) 129.05 feet; thence South 55 57'29" West a distance 222.49 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 37 26'29" and a Radius 230.00 feeet) 150.30 feet; thence North 86'36'02" West a distance of 276.68 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the left (having a Delta l9 ° 34'21" and a Radius 225.00 feet) 76.86 feet; thence South 73 49'37" West a distance 63.38 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 3 21'12" and a Radius 1200.00 feet) 70.23 feet; thence South 77 ° 10'49" West a distance 164.01 feet to a point on the West line of said Section 4; thence South 0 40'12" East along the West line of Section 4 a distance 136.72 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above described land containing approximately 6.66 acres. Situate in Spokane• County, State of Washington. Dated this / day of JauP , 19 33. .. P. a. Pd. /,'6ry l/ 'SKIP" CHI PcRG • 8506110zaz Ralph Guthrie t'i et_ I ..CYi Gertrude Guthrie '.E0 •JY,1E'. aSEW© I/ pi,r =S' " Count}_Engineer dub I1 4 u PM'11`1 .' 'L ./ i. (SEAL) (SEAL) r BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 85 0478 IN THE MATTER OF VALLEY VISTA ESTATES STORMWATER AGREEMENT WHEREAS, The development of the Plat -f Valley Vista Estates in olves con- struction of a Stormwater Control and Dispo WHEREAS, The Developer and prospective property owners are responsible for the costs of maintenance and uatio of the Stormwater Control System and an agreement has been prepared or a ocation of such maintenance costs and the County Engineer recommends approval thereof by the Board of County Commissioners. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED That the between Spokane County and the Developer proved. PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, this - 1/ day of k1' 4,1985. ATTEST: WILD . DONAHUE THE BOARD BY DEPUTY ti RESOLUTION Iry Stormwater Control and Disposal Agreement of Valley Vista Estates is hereby ap- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON • 85 04'78 THIS AGREEMENT made this 7th 2) Right of Inspection -- Not applicable. AGREEMENT day of lune See attached #1. , 1985, by and between Guthrie Investments Inc. hereinafter referred to as the "Developer ", and Spokane County, a political subdivi- sion of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "County ", to wit: WHEREAS, the Developer is the owner of a certain tract of land platted into lots, blocks, and streets, known as Valley Vista Fstates , hereinafter referred to as the "Subdivision" and being more particularly described as follows: WHEREAS, a system of stormwater collection and diposal is to be installed in order that storm sewers shall be available to the residents of the Subdivision as they occupy the houses therein, and WHEREAS, the single system of stormwater collection and disposal is to be installed will jointly and collectively serve the plat known as Valley Vista F states and: WHEREAS, the Developer is in need of a governmental agency to assume responsibility for the continuous and satisfactory operation and maintenance of the stormwater system, in the County land described as follows: See attachment #2. WHEREAS, the County is willing to assume the responsibility of operation and maintenance of the stormwater system on the terms and conditions herafter set forth. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises and covenants hereafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1) Construction -- The County shall construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together will all appurtenant facilities. Such construction shall be included in a RID formed for such purpose pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW. The design shall conform to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. There shall be no cost to the County for the design or construction of the Subdivision Stormwater System. All costs associated with the design and construction shall be included in the RID and allocated to properties within the boundaries of the RID as provided for in County ordinances concerning road improvement district assessments. 3) Certification -- Not applicable. 4) Easements -- The Developer shall furnish the County with perpetual easements and /or deeds for all portions of the Subdivision Stormwater System lying outside dedicated public rights of way. 5) Warranty -- Not applicable. 6) Additions -- No additional service areas outside the subdivision shall be connected during the life of this agreement to the Subdivision Stormwater System without the expressed written approval of the County. 7) Acceptance -- The Developer shall advise all person, firms, or corporations empbyed by him to sell lots within the Subdivision of the necessity of the County's acceptance of the Subdivision Stormwater System for operation and maintenance prior to the establishment of the road and occupancy of any dwelling units and /or lots on the property serviced by the Subdivision Stormwater System. Acceptance by the County shall be formal acceptance by the Spokane County Engineer of the construction of the Subdivision Stormwater System referred to herin. 8) Operation and Maintenance -- The County shall provide the personnel, vehicles, additiotal equipment other than provided for above, and materials necessary to operate maintain the Subdivision Stormwater System and shall keep an accurate record of the costs thereof. Strh records shall be open to the inspection of the Developer. 9) Fees -- The County shall be responsible for the collection of fees in accordance with the following schedule: For each Unit and /or lot connected The monthly charge of to the Subdivision Stormwater System Single Family Residence $2.75 per Unit Monthly service charges shall be applicable for each Unit and/or lot beginning the month following the date of acceptance of the part of the System serving the units as provided above ia•par•agraph 7 and for each nth thereafter. Developer's habit" for the monthly charges with respect to any given unicand ,'or lot will be terminated with o sale of said unit and /or lot. That liability shall thence be the sole responsibility of the lot purchaser. however, the County may, at its option, bill on a yearly basis. Such schedule of charges shall remain in force and effect until such time as a revised schedule of charges is approved by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners after public notice of the intention to revise charges and public hearing thereon. Effective date of revised charges shall be as provided by resolution but no less than thirty days after the adoption of such resolution. The Developer shall be responsible for insuring that all initial occupants of any dwelling unit built on lots within the Subdivision are aware of the provisions within this paragraph concerning fees and also the provisions within paragraph 7 concerning the necessity of the County's acceptance of the System prior to occupancy. 10) Excess or Deficit Costs -- To the extent that the monthly charges received from units servied by the System exceed the operation and maintenance cost of the System, it is understood and agreed by the parties that said excess monies shall be rebated to each unit. If the monthly charges are not sufficient to cover the operation and maintenance costs of the system, the schedule of charges shall be increased as stated in paragraph 9. 11) Survival of Covenants and Binding Effect - -- All of the promises, covenants, terms and conditions of this agreement shall survive the conveyance hereunder, and this agreement shall extend to and bind the successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. The terms d this agreement shall be included in the sales agreements conveying any part of the plat Valley Vista Estates • 12) Term -- This agreement shall remain in full force and effect until the date of Conveyance as provided in paragraph 15 herein. 13) Security -- Not applicable. 14) Tax -- The Developer shall be responsible for paying any and all real, personal, and other taxes as come due and are owing on the Subdivision Stormwater System or real property housing the same until the Subdivision Stormwater system is conveyed as provided for in paragraph 15 herein. In the event that any taxes are not paid when they come due and are owing, the County shall have the right to immediately terminate any of its obligations under this agreement to operate or maintain the Subdivision Stormwater System upon 30 days notice to the Developer, during which time the Developer Ina cure said breach, and the Count P Developer y Y ` ". reserves the right to pursue any other legal remedies available for the Developer's breach of this provision. 15) Conveyance and Reversion -- The County is in the process of developing and Comprehensive Stormwater Management Program and Plan. It is possible that part or all of this subdivisiar Stormwater System may be incorporated into this Ilan. At such time as part or all of the Subdivision Stormwater System is proposed to be incorporated, the County will give the Developer 30 days notice of such action. The Developer shall convey such portions of the Subdivision Stormwater System and all rights and appurtenances thereto as necessary. Conveyance shall be at no cost to the County: and shall be accomplished by a Rill of Sale for all real and personal property involved. Those facilities, if any as determined by the County Engineer, no longer necessary for the Subdivision Stormwater System shall be reconveyed and returned to the Grantor. 16) Comprehensive Storunaater Management Program -- The Developer or successor(s) ih interest agree to join in any Comprehensive Stormwater Management Program and to pay such rates , nd charges in addition to or in lieu of those stated in paragraph 9 above as may be fixed through public hearings for service or benefit obtained by the planning, establish— ment or maintenance of-stormwater control facilities in addition to or in lieu of the subdivision Stormwater System. 17) In the event an action is brought involy ng a breach of warranty or other action involving this agreement, it is agreed that the venue of such action shall be in Spokane County, and it further is agreed that the prevailing party shall be entitled to attorney's fees as adjudged by the Court to be reasonable. 18) Developer's option t o meet obligation to design and construct by P i t ) -- The parties agree that the Developer may meet his obligation to design and construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together with all appurtenant facilities as described in paragraph 1 herein by inclusion of such improvements within the improvements of a road improvement district (RID) formed pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW. in the event that the developer opts to meet his obligation to design and construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together with all appurtenant facilities by inclusion of the same within the improvements of a R i i) formed for road improvements and Stormwater improvements, the parties agree that paragraphs 2,3,'„7. and 13 of this agreement shall be mull and void. WILLIA CLER S. A)E OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) Guthrie Investments Inc. 1985. DONAHUE HE BOARD On this 7th day of DEVELOPER lune BY Title SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this SPOKANE BY man, Boar. o County Commissioners pokane County, Washington , 1985, before me personally appeared Ralph & Gertrude Guthrie of Guthrie Investments Inc-. who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument, and ackowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said Guthrie Investments Inc. for the uses and purposesharreinmentioned, and an oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of the ary Public In and for the State of Washington residing at S Washington GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL the day and year in this certificate ?f , first above written. . Att. .ment # 1 ADDENDUM TO MMNTENANCIE: AGREEMENT Legal Description of Valley Vista Estates: A portion of Land in Government Lot 9, in Section 4, T24N, R44E, W.M. , Spokane County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 9; thence N00 ° 40'12 "W along the West line of said Section 4, a distance of 433.08 feet to the True Point of. beginning for this description. Thence continuing N00 °40'12 "W a distance 217.91 feet to a point of a Non - Tangent curve having a Radial Bearing 54°10'39 "E: thence. along a curve to the right (having a delta 8 ° 28'03" and a radius of 440.00 feet) 65.03 feet; thence S85 ° 42'36 "E - 545.76 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta of 50 ° 09'44" and a radius 380.00 feet) 332.69 feet: thence N44 07'40 "E a distance 365.66 feet to a point of a curve; thence along a curve to the left (having a delta 26 ° 02'31" and a radius 380.00 feet) 172.72 feet: thence N18 ° 05'09 "E - 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a delta 14 ° 45'45" and a radius 440.00 feet) 1.13.37 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve. Said point having a Radial Bearing S57 ° 09'06 "E; thence N89 ° 12'57 "E - 73.72 feet; thence S35 ° 14'39 "W - 24.97 feet to a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta 17 ° 09'30" and a radius 380.00 feet) 113.80 feet; thence 518 ° 05'09 "W - 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a delta of 19 and a radius 440.00 feet) 149.75 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve having a Radial Bearing N52 ° 24'Sl "W; thence 545 ° 52'20 "E - 199.86 feet; thence 544 ° 07'40 "W - 356.00 feet, thence S47 ° 09'45"W a distance 165.22 feet; thence 562 ° 25'24 "W a distance 139.16 feet; thence 523 ° 46'32 "E - 287.22 feet; thence S01 ° 21'03 "W - 50.00 feet; thence N88 ° 38'57 "W - 224.77 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a delta 36 ° 33'16" and a radius 355.00 feet) 226.49 feet; thence N52 ° 05'41 "W - 149.10 feet; thence 537 ° 54'19 "W - 170.00 feet; thence N52 ° 05'41 "W - 149.09 feet; thence N48 ° 15'43 "W - 308.08 feet to the point of beginning. AESCRIPI'i0N •FnR PARK PROPERTY Att( vent #2 A portion of land in Government Lot 9, in Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M., Spokane, County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 9; thence North 00 °40'12" West along the West line of said Section 4, a distance of 650.99 feet to the True Point of beginning for this description. Said point being a point of a Non - Tangent curve having a Radial Bearing South 4 ° 10'39" East; thence along a curve to the right (having a Delta 8 °28'03" and a Radius of 440.00 feet) 65.03 feet; thence South 85 ° 42'36" East a distance of 545.7 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a Delta of 50 °09'44" and a Radius 380.00 feet) 332.69 feet; thence North 44 °07'40" East a distance 365.66 feet to a point of a curve; thence along a curve to the left (having a Delta 26 ° 02'31" and a Radius 330.00 feet) 172.72 feet; thence North 18 ° 05'09" East a distance of 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 7 °07'47" and a Radius 440.00 feet) 54.75 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve. Said point having a Radial Bearing North 64947'04" West; thence South 81 °17'57" West a distance 34.61 feet to a point of a curve; thence on - a curve to the left (having a Delta 21 ° 18'41" and a Radius 135.00 feet) 50.21 feet; thence South -59 °59'17" West a distance 125.94 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the left (having a Delta 36 °10'42" and a Radius 135.00 feet) 85.24 feet; thence South 23 °48'35" West a distance 39.35 feet to a point of a. curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 32 °08'54" and a Radius 230.00 feet) 129.05 feet; thence South 55 °57'29" West a distance 222.49 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 37 ° 26'29" and Radius 230.00 feet) 150.30 feet; thence North 86 °36'02" West a distance of 276.68 feet to a point of a curve; thence on _a curve to the left (having a Delta 19 ° 3 4 ' 21 " and a Radius 225.00 feet) 76.86 feet; thence South 73 °49'37" West a distance 63.38 feet to a point of . a. curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 3 ° 21'12" and a Radius 1200.00 feet) 70.23 feet; thence South 77 °10'49" West a distance 164.01 feet to a point on the West line of said Section 4; thence South 0 °40'12" East along the West line of Section 4 a distance 136.72 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above described land containing approximately 6.66 Acres. Situate in Spokane County, State of Washington. ti " 1NAS <b t . r Inter-office Communication To VEtti From Crt4 N. Subject 1/1 OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IS 7-1/ - Dote 14" c 7"A Es 7 F PI & AM01^) kdhe 19 c ov, /194 fr res 4.7 or 47 !we t r OA A eee1/4_ /r7 e For„,,,cfr ttz A 6 506110299 STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT The Grantors Ralph D. Guthrie and Gertrude 0. Guthrie, husband and wife, of the County of Spokane, State of Washington, for and in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) to them in hand paid, and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grants to Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, an Easement over, under, upon and across the hereinafter described lands situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washington: A strip of land 15 feet wide in Government Lot 9, Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M., being 7.5 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning at the most Northerly Point of Lot 1, Block 1, of Valley Vista Estates; thence South 45 0 52'20" East along the Easterly line of said Lot 1 a distance 67.36 feet to the True Point of Beginning for this description; thence North 12 13'06" West a distance 25.65 feet; thence North 48 ° 45'09" West a distance 47.59 feet to the Southerly Right -of -way line of Ponderosa Drive and there Terminating this description. Situate in Spokane County, State of Washington. The Easement granted to Spokane County and its authorized agents is for the sole purposes of allowing natural drainage and /or runoff over and across the above described lands. The grantors hereby agree not to obstruct, artificially collect or discharge the flow across or adjacent to the above described lands. The grantors agree that Spokane County accepts no responsibility for maintaining the drainage Easement. The grantors accept complete and total responsibility for the construction and perpetual maintenance of the facilities located within this drainage Easement per plans on file in the office of the Spokane County Engineer. The grantors hereby release Spokane County and all its officers, employees and agents from any responsibility or liability for any damage whatsoever, including inverse condemnation by or to any and all persons or property arising out of or in any way incident to or attributable to the storm drainage within said Easement. The Easement described hereinabove is to and shall run with the land. No modification of the boundaries of said Easement can be made without the prior approval of Spokane County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 7th day of June , 19 85 R. E. Excis Tax Exempt Date 1 / ;19 Sp ant County Weas. TATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss SPOKANE COUNTY oc- t —t SCA% c ' OE 75 VOL U PACE 68 / On this 76- day of ( �li _ , 1923, personally appeared before me known to me to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses .arid�;,purposes herein mentioned. ycS) !<<t • WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed thefday. p'd r first above written. ".�:c 'O ,`'Q: '. R.ltil . ,^,- 41001.:LA AEI Ad Ni ary Public, in an' for the. „State °of Washington, residing in Spokane-, WA. e�-y Storm Drainage Easement Govt Lot 9 FORM I- AUDITOR ;', ,��, I -c, 00299 C o Ralph D. & Gertrude 0. Guthrie to Spokane County RECEIVED FOR RECORD, this date, the above instrument, numbered in order of reception. WILLIAM E. DONAHUE County Auditor Spokane County, Washington NO. 85 0477 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON PS- 1407 -81 ZS -40 -81 IN THE MATTER OF FILING THE FINAL PLAT ) OF VALLEY VISTA ESTATES AND ZONE CHANGE ) FROM UNCLASSIFIED TO R -1 LOCATED IN ) R E S O L U T I O N SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 24N, RANGE 44 EWM, ) SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, that the Final Plat of VALLEY VISTA ESTATES that portion of Government Lot 9 in Section 4, Township 24N, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Government lot 9; thence N00 °40'12 "W along the West line of said Section 4, a distance of 433.08 feet to the True Point of beginning for this description. Thence continuing N00 ° 40'12 "W a distance 217.91 feet to a point of a Non - Tangent curve having a Radial Bearing S4 ° 10'39 "E; thence along a curve to the right (having a delta 8 ° 28'03" and a radius of 440.00 feet) 65.03 feet; thence S85 ° 42'36 "E - 545.76 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta of 50 °09'44" and a radius 380.00 feet) 332.69 feet; thence N44 °07'40 "E a distance 365.66 feet to a point of a curve; thence along a curve to the left (having a delta 26 ° 02'31" and a radius 380.00 feet) 172.72 feet; thence N18 ° 05'09 "E - 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a delta 14 °45'45" and a radius 440.00 feet) 113.37 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve. Said point having a Radial Bearing 557 °09'06 "E; thence N89 ° 12'57 "E - 73.72 feet; thence S35`1 "W - 24.97 feet to a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta 17 °09'30" and a radius 380.00 feet) 113.80 feet; thence S18 °05'09 "W - 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a Melts of 19 . and a radius 440.00 feet) 149.75 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve having.a Radial Bearing N52 °24 "W; thence S45 °52'20 "E - 199.86 feet; thence 544"07 "W - 356.00 feet; thence S47 °09'45 "W a distance 165.22 feet; thence 562'25'24 "W a distance 139.16 feet; thence S23 °46'32 "E - 287.22 feet; thence S01 ° 21'03 "W - 50.00 feet; thence N88 °38'57 "W - 224.77 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a delta 36 °33'16" and a radius 355.00 feet) 226.49 feet; thence N52 °05'41 "W - 149.10 feet; thence S37 °54'19 "W - feet; thence N52 °05'41 "W - 149.09 feet; thence N48 °15'43 "W - 308.08 feet to the point of beginning. more precisely described in the plat dedication, on the recommendation of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee, be, and the same hereby is approved, with the exception that the public rights of way dedicated in this plat will not be established for maintenance purposes until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a separate resolution of the Board of County Commissioners. PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS % DAY OF ATTEST: B WILLIAM E. DONAHUE Clerke'f the, Board'") , 1985. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON See attached. '.1 ;FILED CEO RECORQEra P EIIIIJE ST !2f Cnunty..Engineer JUN 7 3 59 PH '85 WILLIAFI E. DONAH!UE AUDITOR :SPOKANE COUNTY. WASH. DEPUTY r . :'.tNU Req Court House xxx Dated this SEATS of WASIIIN( IUrr ) couHT OF SPOKANE ) " On this . _04 d, y of apped red l_ ( . Lt - _ /10D. 0 000':02•'19 1:11 P L It M 1 1 KNOW ALL MEN BY 111LSL. I'NLSENTS, diet the GI'a11 LW' a Washington corporation for an in consideration of Mutual Benefits day of or 19 B,S. . Given unlii: wy hand an d ',t i till (1 dd ..f / J CS H idol I , I : ie'J I I1 1g1 : .1; ?, 937 n t CEP: F-7 In the Matter or Valley Vista Estates Guthrie Investments Inc., grants to Spokane County and its designs, the right, privilege and permit of ingress and egress over, across and upon the hereinafter described lands from the date hereof until such time as Gertrude Blvd. is extended easterly and accepted as a Cnunty Rnad. for the purpose of a temporary turnarnund, with the understanding that no access shall be permitted to the turnarnund frnm any abutting lands. Said lands situated in Spokane Fowlty, State of Washington, and .described as follows: . v-)L) %C : I'r a �, Ilrtur we I•In snnal ly G1"LI /e L' known to mr_• to he the individual(•,) det,Lrlhrd here cxr the (oil go ing inst.`rument. and dcknuwlrrdt l lie .d l l i ruun nI to hr ttie t rey anti voluntary act mid deed tor the u,c, and purpu•.e:• herein wrnllolled. 1u In ,1•;i1• Ch;; '•1 tic CUL -DE -SAC EASEMENT A Portion of land in Government Lot 9, Section 4, T2,4N, R44E, W.IV'I., Spokane County, State of Washington, to be held as road ease- ment for a Temporary Cul -De -Sac by Spokane County untill such time as the road named "Gertude Drive" is extended. Said ease - ment being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the West Quarter Corner of said Section 4; thence North 00 °40'12" West a distance 4433.08 feet; thence South 48 °15'43" East a distance 308.08 feet; thence South 52 ° 05'41" East a distance 149.09 feet; thence North 37 ° 54'19" East a dis- tance 170.00 feet to the Southerly Right -of -Way line of Gertude Drive thence South 52 ° 05'41" East along the Southerly Right -of- Way line of said Gertude Drive 149.10 fee a point of a curve to the heft having a Delta of 36 °33'16" and a Radius 355. feet; thence along the said curve to the left 226.49 feet; thence South 88 °38'57" East a distance 224.77 feet to the True Point of Beginning for this description, and a Point of a Curve to the right having a Delta 52 °01'03" and a Radius of 15 feet; thence along said curve 13.62 feet to a Point of Reverse Curve to the left having a Delta of 104 °02'06" and a Radius of 50.00 feet; thence along said Curve 90.79 feet to a point of a Reverse Curve to the right.having a.Delta of 52 °01'03" and a Radius of 15.00 feet; thence along said Curve 13.62 feet to a'. Point; thence South 88 °38'57" East a distance 7.00 feet; thence North 01 °21'03" East a distance 50.00 feet; thence North 88 ° 38'57" West a distance 7.00 feet to . a. Point of a Curve to the right having a Delta 52 ° 01'03" and a Radius of 15..00 feet; thence along said Curve 13.62 feet to a Point of a Reverse Curve to the left having a Delta 104 °02'06" and a Radius of 50.00 feet; thence along said Curve to the left 90.79 feet to a Reverse Curve to the right having a Delta 52 °0 1' 0 3" and a Radius of 15.00 feet; thence along said Curve to the right 13.62 feet to a Point; thence South 01 °21'03" West a distance 50.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. 5f1. 755 PACE 938 TD: Spokane County Engineer Dear Sir: June 7, 1985 RE: Road Improvement District No. 418 Ponderosa Drive The undersigned developer of property known as VALLEY VISTA ESTATES, acknowledges his obligation to perform the earthwork and grading on the roads in the development in accordance with-County-approved plans and agrees not to object or protest any assessment for costs incurred by the Road Improvement District in completing the earthwork or grading necessary for the finished roadway construction in accordance with the plans. TO: Spokane County Engineer Dear Sir: RECEIVED JUN 10 1985 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER June 7, 1985 RE: Road Improvement District No. 418 Ponderosa Drive The undersigned developer of property known as VALLEY VISTA ESTATES, acknowledges his obligation.to.perform the earthwork and grading on the roads in the development in accordance with County- approved plans and agrees not to object or protest any assessment for costs incurred by the Road Improvement District in completing the earthwork or grading necessary 'for the finished roadway construction in accordance with the plans. DEVELOPER ( 7 1 1 7 -e— Q Ralph Guthrie Dated this STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED THE GRANTOR, Ralph D. Guthrie and Gertrude 0. Guthrie, husband and wife, for and in consideration of mutual benefits, in hand paid, conveys to SPOKANE COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, the following described real estate, situated in the COUNTY of SPOKANE, State of Washington: A portion of land in Government Lot 9, in Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M., Spokane, County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 9; thence North 00 ° 40'12" West along the West . line of said Section 4, a distance of 650.99 feet to the True Point of Beginning for this description. Said,point being a point of a Non - Tangent curve having a Radial Bearing South 4 10'39" East; thence along a curve to the right (having a Delta 8 ° 28'03" and a Radius of 440.00 feet) 65.03 feet; thence South 85 ° 42'36" East a distance of 545.76 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a Delta of 50 ° 09'44" and a Radius of 380.00 feet) 332.69 feet; thence Nor_th._44 07'40'- 'East a distance of 365.66 feet to a point of a curve; thence along a curve to the left (having a Delta 26 02'31" and a Radius 380.00 feet) 172.72 feet; thence North 18 East a distance of 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 7 07'47" and a Radius 440.00 feet) 54.75 feet to. a Non - Tangent point on the curve. Said point having a Radial Bearing North 64 ° 47'04" West; thence South 81 ° 17'57" West a distance 34.61 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the left (having a Delta 21 and a Radius 135.00 feet) 50.21 feet; thence South 59 59'17" West a distance 125.94 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the left (having a Delta 36 10'42" and a Radius 135.00 feet) 85.24 feet; thence South 23 ° 48'35" West a distance 39.35 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 32 ° 08'54" and a Radius 230.00 feet) 129.05 feet; thence South 55 57'29" West a distance 222.49 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the, right (having a Delta 37 26'29" and a Radius 230.00 feeet) 150.30 feet; thence North 86 ° 36'02" West a distance of 276.68 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the left (having a Delta 19 ° 34'21" and a Radius 225.00 feet) 76.86 feet; thence South 73 49'37" West a distance 63.38 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 3 2.1'12" and a Radius 1200.00 feet) 70.23 feet; thence South 77 ° 10'49" West a distance 164.01 feet to a point on the West line of said Section 4; thence South 0 40'12" East along the West line of Section 4 a distance 136.72 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above described land containing approximately 6.66 acres. Situate in Spokane County, State of Washington. day of , 19 . (SEAL) (SEAL) The Grantors Ralph D. - Guthrie and Gertrude 0. Guthrie, husband and wife, of the County of Spokane, State of Washington, for and in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) to them in hand paid, and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grants _to _Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, an Easement over, under, upon and • across the hereinafter described lands situated in the - County of Spokane, State of Washington: A strip of land 15 feet wide in Government Lot 9, Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M., being 7.5 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning at the most Northerly Point of Lot 1, Block 1, of Valley Vista Estates; thence South 45 °52'20" East along the Easterly line of said Lot 1 a distance 67:36 feet to the True Point of Beginning for this description; thence North 12° 13'06" West a distance 25.65 feet; thence North 48 ° 45'09" West a distance 47.59 feet to the Southerly Right -of -way line of Ponderosa Drive and there Terminating this description. Situate in Spokane County, State of Washington. The Easement granted to- •Spokane•County- .and -its authorized agents is for the sole purposes of allowing natural drainage and /or runoff over and across the above described lands. The grantors hereby agree not to obstruct, artificially collect or discharge the flow across or adjacent to the above described lands. The grantors agree that. Spokane County accepts no responsibility for maintaining the ,drainage Easement. The grantors accept complete and total responsibility for the construction and perpetual maintenance of the facilities located within this drainage Easement per plans on file in the office of'the Spokane County Engineer. The grantors hereby release Spokane County and all its . officers, employees and agents from any responsibility or liability for any damage whatsoever, including inverse condemnation by or to any and all persons or property arising out of or in any way incident to or attributable to the storm drainage within said Easement. , The Easement described hereinabove is to and shall run with the land. No modification of the boundaries of said Easement can be made without the prior approval of Spokane County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have hereunto set our hands this day of , 19 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss SPOKANE COUNTY STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT On this day of , 19 , personally appeared before 1ne known to me to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes herein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing in Spnkane, WA. DESCRIPTI0N=F0R PARK PROPERTY A portion of land in Government Lot 9, in Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M., Spokane, County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing • at the Southwest corner. of said Government Lot 9; thence North 00 °40'12" West along the West line of said Section 4, a distance of 650.99 feet to the True Point of beginning for this description. Said point being a point of a Non - Tangent curve having a Radial Bearing South 4 °10'39" East; thence along a curve to the right (having a Delta 8 °28'03" and a. Radius of 440.00 feet) 65.03 feet; thence South 85 °42'36" East a distance of 545.76 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a Delta of 50 °09'44" and a Radius 380.00 feet) 332.69 feet; thence North 44 °07'40" East a distance 365.66 feet to a point of a curve; thence along a. curve to the .left (having a Delta 26 °02'31" and a Radius 380.00 feet) 172.72 feet; thence North 18 °05'09" East a distance of 117.30 feet to a point of a. curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 7 °07'47" and a Radius 440.00 feet) 54.75 feet to a. Non-Tangent point on the curve. Said point having a Radial Bearing North 64'947'04" West; thence South 81 ° 17'57" West a distance 34.61 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the left (having a Delta 21 ° 18'41" and a Radius 135.00 feet) 50.21 feet; thence South 49°59 '"17 " West a distance-126,24 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the left (having a Delta 36 °10'42" and a Radius 135.00 feet) 85.24 feet; thence South 23 °48'35" West a distance 39.35 feet to a point of a. curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 32 °08'54" and a Radius 230.00 feet) 129.05 feet; thence South 55°57'29".West a distance' 222.49 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a. Delta. 37 ° 26'29" and a Radius 230.00 feet) 150.30 feet; thence North 86 °36'02" West a distance of 276.68 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the left (having a Delta 19 ° 3 4 '21" and a Radius 225.00 feet) 76.86 feet; thence South 73 °49'37" West a distance 63.38 feet to a point of - a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 3 °21'12" and a. Radius 1200.00 feet) 70.23 feet; thence South 77 ° 10'49" West a distance 164.01 feet to a •point on the West line of said Section 4; thence South 0 °40'12" East along the West line of Section 4 a distance 136.72 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above described land containing approximately 6.66 Acres. Situate in Spokane County, State of Washington. ,, w G •• ` �s ° -••CF NSW /. ' r 4 ce 7 r °• 150 µ 4 /i AL; Ir THIS AGREEMENT made this I'th day 01 7.1.iy by arlri i3O1 weer) Guthrie Investments. a Washington Corporation hereinafter referred to as the "Developer;'. and.Spokane County. a political subdivi- sion of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the 'County ". to wit: WHEREAS, the Developer is the owner of a certain tract of land platted into rots. blocks. and streets, known as Valley Vista Estates - , hereinatter referred to'as the "Subdivision" and being more particularly described as follows: See attached sheet. WIIEREAS. a system of stormwater collection and disposal is to be installed in order ;hat storm sewers shall be available to the residents of the Subdivision as they occupy the houses therein, and WHEREAS, the single system of stormwater collection and disposal to be installed will jointly and collectively serve the plat known as Valley Vista Estates and: WHEREAS, the Developer is in need of a governmental agency to assume responsibility for the continuous and satisfactory o(�eration and maintenance of the stormwater systems% and % :._ _ v,t c1 X 4 cescR �s faI /dws, Se :.•A14Nc WHEREAS. the County is willing to assume the responsibility of operation a of the stormwater system on the terms and conditions hereafter set forth, I maintenance Slti t-+ NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises and covenants hereafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows: Construction -- The County shall construct a stormwater collection system and dispo;., 1 facility, together will all appurtenant facilities. Such construction shall be included in a RID formed for such purpose pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW. The design shall conform to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. There shall be no cost to the County for the design or construction of the Subdivision Stormwater System. All costs associated with the design and construction shall be included in the RI!) and allocated to properties within the boundaries of the R I Lt as provided for in County ordinances concerning road improvement district assessments. 2) Right of Inspection -- Not applicable. ,I) Certification -- Not applicable. 4) Easements -- The Developer shall furnish the County with perpetual easements and'cr deeds for all protions of the Subdivision Stormwater System lying outside dedict,2ted public rights of way. 5) Warranty -- Not applicable. 6) Additions -- No additional service areas outside the Subdivision shall be connected during the life of this agreement to the Subdivision Stormwater System without the expressed written approval of the County: 7) Acceptance - -The developer shall advise all person. firms or corporations employed by him to sell lots within the Subdivision of the necessity of the t ,wnty's acceptance of the Subdivision Stormwater System for operation and maintenance prior to. the estaluishment of the toad and occupancy of any dwelling units and /or lots on the property serviced by the Subdivision Stormwater System. Acceptance by the County shalt he formal acceptance by the Spokane County Engineer of the construction of the. Subdivision stormwater System referred to herein. 8) Operation and Maintenance -- The County shall provide the personnel, vehicles. additional equipment other than provided for above. and materials necessary tc perate and maintain the Subdivision Stormwater System and shall-keep an accurate record of the costs thereof. Such records shall be open to the inspection of the Developer. 9) Fees -- The County shall be responsible for the collection of feet in accordance with the Following schedule: For each Unit and /or lot connected to the Subdivision Stormwater •system Single Family Residence The monthly charge of per U nit monthly service charges shall be applicable for t'a•th Unit and 'or lot beginning the month following the date of acceptance of the part of he tIystem servin:c the units as provided above irrior uph 7 and for etc. .tonth iho r, fr, r t t r mon with respect to any given unit and or lot ti t .,.1ted i.;i t't !, et ••at; ur.t. t. lot. That liability shall thence be the sot, r i.= tb rl of the 1, .r ;,�, ... t: , ;. • ,. ;ilc County may, at its option. bill on a yearly Hsi,. . SH:li'schedule of ,,,; ..b:l! remit nt force and effect until such time as a. revised sclicdni.•. ..! charges is ,;,prc,v.; t by r,'—;tut of the Board of County Commissioneim:aftecpuhlic notice Lif the intention; t.. re‘ ; ! { and public hearing thereon. Effective date.of revised charges shall be as peC%t H' such resolution but no less than thirty day the adoption of such resol,ttien, rho Developer shalt be responsible for insuring that all initial occupants of any . wellin.' unit built on lots within the Subdivision are aware of the provisions within this paragraph conccrnit,, fees and also the provisions within paragraph 7 concerning the necessity of the Counr;' acceptance of the System prior to occupancy. 10) Excess or Deficit -Costs -- To the extent that -the monthly charges received from twits servied by the System exceed the operation and maintenance cost of the System, it is understood and agreed by the parties that said excess monies shall be rebated to each unit. If the monthly charges are not sufficient to cover the operation and maintenance costs of the system, the schedule of charges shall be increased as stated in paragraph 9. 11) Survival of Covenants and, Binding Effect -- All of the promises, covenants, terms and conditions of this agreement shall survive the conveyance hereunder, and this agreement shall extend to and bind the successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. The terms d this agreement shall be included in the sales agreements conveying any part of the plat Valley Vista F states 12) Term -- This agreement shall remain in full force and effect until the date of Conveyance as provided in paragraph 15 herein: - 13) Security -- Not applicable. 14) Tax -- The Developer shall be r.esponsible.foripay-ing any and all real, personal, and other taxes as come due and are owing on the Subdivision Stormwater System or real property housing the same until the Subdivision Stormwater system is conveyed as provided for in paragraph 15 herein. In the event that any taxes are not paid when they come due and are owing, the County shall have the right to immediately terminate any of its obligations under this agreement to operate or maintain the Subdivision Stormwater System upon 30 days notice to the Developer, 'during which time the Developer may cure said breach, and the County reserves the right to pursue any other legal remedies available for the Developer's breach of this provision. 15) Conveyance and Reversion -- The County is in the process of developing and Comprehensive Stormwater Management Program and Plan. It is possible that part or all of this subdivisica Stormwater System may be incorporated into this Plan. At such time as part or all of the Subdivision Stormwater System is proposed to be incorporated, the County will give the Developer 30 days notice of such action. The Developer shall convey such portions of the Subdivision Stormwater System and all rights and appurtenances thereto as necessary. Conveyance shall be at no cost to the County: and shall be accomplished by Bill of Sale for all real and personal property involved. Those facilities, if any as determined by the County Engineer, no longer necessary for the Subdivision Stormwater System shall be reconveyed and returned to the Grantor. 16) Comprehensive Stormwater Management Program -- The Developer or successor(s) in - interest agree to join in any Comprehensive Stormwater Management Program and to pay such rates and charges in addition to or in lieu of those stated in paragraph 9 above as may be Fixed through public hearings for service or benefit obtained by the planning, establish— ment or maintenance of stormwater control facilities in addition to or in lieu of the subdivision Stormwater System. 17) In the event an action is brought involv ng a breach of warranty or other action involving this agreement, it is agreed that the venue of such action shall be in Spokane County, and it further is agreed that the prevailing party shall be entitled to attorney's fees as adjudged by the Court to be reasonable. IS) Developer's option to meet obligation to design and construct by RID -- The parties agree that the Developer may meet his obligation to design and construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together with all appurtenant facilities as described in paragraph 1 herein by inclusion of such improvements within the improvements of a road improvement district (RID) formed pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW. In the event that the developer opts to meet his obligation to design and construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together with all appurtenant facilities by inclusion of the same within the improvements of a RID formed for road improvements and stormwater improvements. the parties agree that paragraphs 2,3,5,7. and 13 of this agreement shall he null and void. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE CLERK'OF THE BOARD DEPUTY APPROVED AS TO FORM: Deputy Prosecuting Attorney STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) President. Guthrie Investments Inc. 1'iile SPOKANE COUNTY BY Chairman, Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington On this Z o day of w , 1985, before me personally appeared 03 l of Q.,\ _f•• who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument. and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said ) S for the uses and purposes herein mentioned, and an oath stated that he was authorized to 7� execute the said instrument on behalf of the \7 .,' 5( 1 �j �Z n. Nw h 0^; T GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL the day and year in this certificate first above written. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 2 o 1985. day of ry Public In and for the of Washington. resi ing at Spokane, Washington. L'JL e'itli;021:0 DECLARATION OF PRO;ft TIVE COVENANTS VALLEY VISTA ESTATES vu.055 17,4 394 KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Ralph and Gertrude Guthrie, a husband and wife, being owner of all lots in VALLEY VISTA ESTATES, the County of Spokane, State of Washington, as per map thereof recorded in the office-of the County Auditor of said county do hereby declare the following protective covenants and conditions for the use and benefit of all said property which they own and for the use and benefit of .each and every purchaser of any of said property: A. LAND USE AND BUILDING TYPE: No lot shall be used except for residential purposes. No building shall be erected. altered, placed, or permitted to remain on any lot other than one single family dwelling not to exceed two stories in height. A double car garage must be constructed with each residence. B. DWELLING SIZE: The main floor area of the main structures, exclusive of any one story open porches and garages shall not be less than 1200 square feet. All swellings shall have cedar shingle or shake roofs. C. BUILDING LOCATION: No building shall be located on any lot nearer to the front lot line, side lot line. or nearer to the flanking street line that the minimum building set back line, as provided for in Chapter 4.OLA090. D. EASEMENTS: Easements for installations and maintenance of utilities and drainage facilities are reserved as shWn, if any:'�'n the recorded plat and over the rear five feet of each lot. Within these easement areas no structure, planting or other material shall be placed or permitted to•remain which may damage or interfere with the installation and maintenance of utilities, or which may change the direction flow of drainage channelithe easements. or which may obstruct or retard the flow of water through drainage channels in the easements. The easement area of each . lot and all improvements in it shall be maintained continuously by the owner of the lot, except for those improvements for which a public authority or utility company is responsible. E. NUISANCES: No noxious or offensive activity shall be carried on upon any lot, nor shall anything be done thereon which may be or may become an annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood. F. TEMPORARY STRUCTURES: No structures of a temporary character, trailer, basement, tent, shack, garage, barn or other outbuilding shall be used on any lot at any time as a residence either temporarily or permanently. G. SIGNS: No signs of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any lot except one sign of not more than five square feet advertising the property for sale or rent, or signs used by a builder to advertise the property during the construction and sales period. H. LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY: No animals, livestock or poultry of any kind shall be raised, bred or kept on any lot, except that dogs, cats, or other household pets may be kept, provided that they are not kept, bred or maintained for any commercial purpose. No household pet may be kept if, in the opinion of any five lot owners, the pet is a public nuisance. I. GARBAGE AND REFUSE DISPOSAL: No lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground for rubbish, trash, garhhage or other waste shall not be kept except in sanitary containers. All incinerator or other equipment for the storage of disposal of such material shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition. 1• TERM: These covenants are to run wiin he land and shall be binding on all parties and all persons claiming under them for a period of thirty years from the date these covenants are recorded after which time said covenant shall be automatically extended for successive periods of 10 years, unless an instrument signed by a majority of the then owners of the lots has been recorded, agreeing to change said covenants in whole or part. The undersigned as subdivider reserves the right to change or eliminate any of these restrictions at any time if in their sole judgement such change or elimination is desirable, up until all lots are ..old. This shall be accomplished by recording written notice of change or elimination. K. ENFORCEMENT: Enforcement shall he. t y proceedings at law or in equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant either to restrain violation or to recover damagcS. wit 755 ME 2395 L. SEVERABILITY:. Invalidation of any one of these covenants by judgement or court order shall in no way affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. M. COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION : Any dwelling or structure erected or placed on any lot in this subdivision •shall -be completed as to external appearance including finished painting within 9 months after dale of commencement of construction. N. RESIDENCE VALUE: No residence shall be constructed in this plat that has a today's market value of less than $95.000.00 including lot. O. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT: All lot purchasers, their heirs or assigns agree not to protest any future subdivision or development of adjacent properties owned by the subdivider, his heirs or assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE UNDERSIGNED set their seals this ,1985. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. County of Spokane �-L day of 6- c - -/�74 - G�1 c_e_ (:. Ralph Guthrie Gertrude Guthrie i.1 /^ On this day personally appeared before me /`9/P /' ' i!2E ,J ('7UTf/ //= to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and,foregoing , is , r instrument, and acknowledged that that —riVe.ty signed the same a s V [.` �:' ..'',. free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentT.rt+.d„ <' ca 1 GIVEN under my hand and official seal this y`<c day ofd , ,,; 0 _. U 7 , Not y public in and for e State of Washington, residing at( itocEc 67/ 7 . FILED UR RECORDEEaj i I =i1.:; l p• ..Guthrie Investments JUN 6 3 27 PH '85 WILLIAM E. DONAHUE AUDITOR 'SPOKANE COUNTY, WASH.`, DEPUTY. • dJ_`iA E 9211 Trent 99206 u( 111 le Irtvr'tulcnts Inc. At.REE,MEN'f made this 7th A (J t:' l: E vi E - N T do-. Of . une , 1985. by and bet weer hereinafter referred to as the "Developer ". and Spokane County, a political subdivi- sion of the Sat of Washington. hereinafter n:lerFed -to as the "County ", to wit: WHEREAS, the Developer is the owner of a certain tract of land platted into lots, blocks, and streets, known as Valley Vista Estates , hereinafter referred to as the "Subdivision" and being more particularly described as follows: See attached #1. WHEREAS, a system of stormwater collection and diposal is to be installed in order that storm sewers shall be available to the residents of the Subdivision as they occupy the houses therein, and WHEREAS, the single system of stormwater collection and disposal is to be installed will jointly and collectively serve the plat known as Valley Vista Estates and: WI!ERE:AS, the Developer is in need of a governmental agency to assume responsibility for the continuous and satisfactory operation and maintenance of the stormwater system, in The County land described as follows: See attachment #2. WHEREAS, the County is willing to assume the responsibility of operation and maintenance of the stormwater system on the terms and conditions herafter set forth. NOW I HERE FORE, in consideration•of the..ptiernises.and..the mutual - promises and covenants hereafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows: Construction -- The County shall construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together will all appurtenant facilities. Such construction shall be included in a R'. I) formed for such purpose pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW. The design shall conform to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. There shall be no cost to the County for the design or construction of the Subdivision Stormwater System. All costs associated with the design and construction shall be included in the RID and allocated to properties within the boundaries of the RID as provided for in County ordinances concerning road improvement district assessments. Right of Inspection --- Not applicable. • ;i) Certification -- Not applicable. 4; Easements - -- The Developer shall furnish the County with perpetual easements and /or deeds for all portions of the Subdivision Stormwater System lying outside dedicated public rights of way. warranty -- Not applicable. c) Additions - -- No additional service areas outside the subdivision shall be connected d':ring the life of this agreement to the Subdivision Stormwater System without the expressed '.written approval of the County. Acceptan..0 -- The Developer shall advise all person, firms, or corporations employed by hia. to sell lots within the Subdivision of the necessity of the County's acceptance of the subdivision Stormwater System for operation and maintenance prior to the establishment of the road and occupancy of any dwelling units and /or lots on the property serviced by 'ite Subdivision Stormwater System. Acceptance by the County shall he formal acceptance us ib Rpokane':ounty Engineer di the construction of the Subdivision Stormwater System crru - I to her•u:. t.ipe.ration and Maintenance -- The County shall provide the personnel, vehicles, additiotal eynipmcnt other than r rovided for above, and materials necessary to operate maintain the rubdivision Stormwater System and shall keel an accurate record of the costs thereof. Such cords shall be open to the inspection of the Developer. - -- The county shall bet responsible tor the collect of fees in accordance with wine „ heckle: For ea, It Unit and yr tot - :onnectc'I to the 'aiInlivi'.ion ` tormwat,r ='vstem n,41e I ..tntiIv b' r The monthly charge of $2.75 per ltn N•lotr,ht; It be applicable t Ind tor let beginning the month lotiowi n g try of ,t., • ;teat, of the Dart serving, the units as provided ab.xc c - .; rit r, !H. t t.r'', I ibil'�ir r.:�r th��, . ilhii � cli t'c - i�. L iPi l t 't'.lt �i - '`4 tP . y Il 'eSi. aI to al ?I I, -I i:band with ,ale of s.i1d dui; and'.i. cu. Thai liability shall , ' :ca._e l,r Ili.: ' . ..I, ' I. , a:iii,i!r. of the lot purchaser. However, the bounty may, at it:; option. : on . ,'K',t I.r -' .' t)uci - I schedule of charges shall remain in rorce and ;lfect until •;u-_h time as a rr'.tseit. , to lute or • ti_'ges is approved by resolution .lf the I;or cif County t-_minlis :.iotle;"•. (.li, ' i t lI; notice of the intention to revise charges and public hearing thereon. hlFectioc ,hits' of rrc.isc.i charges shall be as provided by such resolution hug no less than thirty Jays ruler the adoption of such resolution. The i)evelop r shall be responsible for insuring that all initial occupants of any dwelling unit Hilt on lots within the Subdivision arc ,twa or the provisions within this paragraph concerning tecs and also the previsions within ii;iI'il 'i , .t1Iternimg the necessity of the County's acceptance of the System prior. to occup:ur:y. 10) Ifxce'ss or Deficit Costs . -- To the extent that the monthly charges received from units scr'vicd by the System exceed the operation and Il;airitenance cost of Ilie System, it is underutood and agreed by the parties that said excess ironies shall be rebated to each unit. If the nlcnthly charges are not sufficient to rover the operation and maintenance costs of the ' system, the schedule of c-harr shall lie increased as stated in paragraph 9. II) Survival of Covenants and Binding Meet -.- All of the promises, covenants, terms and • conditions of this agreement shrill survive the conveyance hereunder, and this agreement shall esteml to and bind the successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. The terms d' this agreement shall be included in the sales agreements conveying any part of the plat 12) Perri -- This agreement shall remain in full force and effect until the date of Conveyance ;is provided in paragraph 15 herein. 13) Security -- Not applicable. ':[.) Tax -- The Developer shall be responsible for paying any and all real, personal, and other taxes as collie due and are owing an the . Stormwater'Syslem or real property housing the same until the 'a,uh7livis"fT 7'Storni system is conveyed as provided for in paragraph IS herein. in the event that any taxes are not paid when they come clue and .m e owing, the County shall have the right to immediately terminate any of its obligations under this agreement to operate or maintain the Subdivision 'Stormwater System upon 30 days notice to the Developer, during '.which lime the Developer may cure said breach, and the County reserves the right it) pursue -any other legal remedies available for the Developer's breach of this provision. i ;) Conveyance and Reversion -- The County is in the process of developing and Comprehensive ' t,?rmwater Management Program and Plan. It is possible that part er all of this subdivisial .tormwater System may be incorporated into this Plan. At such time as part or all of the Subdivision Stormwater System is proposed to Le incorporated, the County will give the Developer 30 , lays notice of such action. The Developer shall convey such portions of the Subdivision Stortnwatet' System and all rights and appurtenances thereto as necessary. Conveyance shall be at no cost to the County; and shall he accomplished by a Pill of Sale for all real and pet•sonrll property involved. 'those facilities, if any as determined by the <'runty I ngine•er, tic longer rtecessnry for the 'subdivision Stormwater System shall be t'ecetiveycti and returned to the Grantor. ;t.) Comprehensive Stcuvrwater Management Program -- The Developer or successor(s) in interest agrc'e IC' join Ill any Comprehensive Storm'water Management Program and to pay such rates and ch,:rges in addition to or in lieu of those stated in paragraph 9 above as may i+e fixed through public hearings for service or benefit obtained by the planning, establish- ment cc maintenance en, :lice of sdormwater control ia:'il:ies in addition to or in lied of the subdivision sterin,c,ucr sybreta. Iv it- .: breach of warranty or other action involving I ; , : n .h.. grail art action is brought inr; � , t h i s r i : ' , r ; ' , ' m r : l , ! , it , , , i i;rt:c.I that Ilse Venue of •each action shall he in Spokane County. and it t!:ritn:'t is agreed that Ho prev.li lir party :.!tall lie entitled to •ilorney's fl•r=. as a l by it t i, t.g!i'i to lie l't li.4ni.iblt'. err'. Option to meal t to i const by I <.II) -- The parties . !hot the 1" may meet Iti-; of i ni-. n to design and , oi u( 'i sl tl tiiwcler ,rt'c cl , :n sysbmn and disposal facility. to .l c t swath all appurtenant PR:ilk:es as described in i'•:.,, s7rai•Il 1 herein by inclusion of such imtirwc:mentr Within the improvements of a roar) improvement diniricl tic i t)) Ic,rnle pursuant I,:. chapter 3m'.58 RC'VJ. in the event that im.' tai• \'Cloy: r apt- I -t i:: ; "'t his obllcatic'n 10 t esign and construct a stormwater collection tc•:n amt di' c.11 ' 1. ! y Iogelhar whin all appurtenant facilities by inclusion of the :.,:::' \:itliin the i:. cvenloni :i of a I. I i) Formed for road imjit'ovemcnts and stcrniwater lags: oven:mit b. inirii:', agree lint pnr :l : ,h :. ? and I of this agreement shall i.e null and 4 WILLIAM E. DONAHUE CLERK OF THE BOARD DEPUTY APPROVED AS TO FORM: Deputy Prosecuting Attorney STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) appeared Ralph & Gertrude Guthrie of Guthrie Investments Inc. who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument; and ackowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said Guthrie Investments Inc. for the uses and purposes h-ereinmentioned, and an oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of the Guthrie Investments Inc. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL the day and year in this certificate first above written. 1985. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this DEVEL Title SPOKAN,E COUNTY, Br Chairman, Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington On this 7th day of lune , 1985, before me personally 7- day o ary Public In and for the State of Washington residing at S , Washington hit Att. a nent ff 1 ADDENI)tJtvl T1t •1AI.N'I FNANC1. AGREEMENT Legal Description of Valley Vista Estates _. A portion 'of !.and in Government Lot 9, hi Section 4, IT24N,'R44E, W.M., Spokane County. Washington, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner: of said.Government Lot 9; thence ° 40'12 "W along the West line of said Section 4, 5 distance of 433.08 feet to the'True Point of 6 beginning for this description. "Thence continuing N00. 40'12'- -'W a distance 217.91 feet to a point of a Non - Tangent curve having a Radial- Dearing 34 ° 10'39 "E: thence along a curve to the right (having a delta 8 and a radius of 440.00 feet)'65.03 feet; thence 585 ° 42'36 "E - 545.76 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta of 50 ° 09'44" and a radius 380.00 feet) 332.69 feet: thence N44 07 "E a distance 365.66 feet to a point of a curve; thence along a curve to the left (having a delta 26 ° 02'31" and a radius 380.00 feet) 172.72 feet; thence N18 ° 05'09 "E - i.17.30 Feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a delta 14 ° 45 ' 4 5 " and a radius 440.00 feet) 113.37 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve. Said point having a Radial Bearing 557 ° 09'06 "E; thence N89 ° 12'57 "E - 73.72 feet; thence 535 - 24•97 feet Lo a curve; thenccalung the curve to the left (having a delta 17 ° 09'30" and a radius 380.00 feet) 113.80 feet; thence S18 ° 05'09 "W - 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a delta of 19 ° 30'(X)" and a radius 440.00 feet) 149.75 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve having a Radial Bearing N52 ° 24'51_ "W; thence 545 ° 52'20 "E - 199.86 feet; thence 544 "W - 356.00 feet, thence 547 ° 09'45 "W a distance 165.22 feet; thence 562 ° 25'24 "W a distance 139.16 feet; thence 523 ° 46132 "E - 287.22 feet; thence 501 ° 21'03 "W - 50.00 feet; thence N88 ° 38'57 "W - 224.77 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the. right (having a delta 36 ° 33'16" and a radius 355.00 feet) 226.49 feet; thence N 52 ° 05' 41 "W - 149.10 feet; thence 337 54' 1.9 "W - 170.00 feet: thence N52 ° 05'41 "W :- 149.09 feet; thence N48 - 308.08 feet to the point of beginning. [G.`S:R11'"['10': [ARK PROPERTY Ar 'timent #2 e A. portion ofi.and in Government Lot 9, in Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M. , Spokane, County -, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: Conmenc i:tg at the .Southwest of said Government Lot 9; thence North 00 °40'12" West along the West line of said Section 4, a distance of 650:99 feet to the True Point of beginning [or this descript ion. Said point being a point of a Non - Tangent curve having a Radial Bearing South 4 °10'39" East; thence along a curve to the eight (having a Delta 8 °28'03" and a Radius of 440.00 feet) 6.5.03 feet; thence South 85 °42'36" East a distance of 545.76 feet to a point of - a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a Delta of 50 0 09 . 44 "• and a Radius 380.00 feet) 332.69 feet; thence North 44 °07'40" East a distance 365.66 feet to a point of a curve; thence along a cur.4e to the left (having a Delta 26 °02'31" and a Radius 380.00 feet) 172.72 feet; thence North 18 °05'09" East a distance of 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 7 °07'47" and a Radius 440.00 feet) 54.75 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve. Said point having a Radial Bearing North 64: °47'04" West; thence South 81 ° 17'57" West a distance 34.61 feet. to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the left (having a Delta 21 °18'41" and a Radius 135.00 feet) 50.21 feet; thence South_ 9 59'17"' West a distance 125.94 feet to a point of a curve;.thence on a curve to'the left (having a Delta )6 °10'42 " -and a- Rad'i•ua 135.00 feet) 85.24 feet; thence South 23 °48'35" West a distance 39.35 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 32 °08'54" and a Radius 230.00 feet) 129.05 feet; thence South 55 ° 57'29" West a distance 222.49 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 37 and a Radius 230.00 feet) 150.30 feet; thence North 86 °36'02" West a distance of 276.68 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the left (having a Delta 19 ° 3 4 '2f" and a Radius 225.00 feet) 76.86 feet; thence South 73 °49'37" West a distance 63.36 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 3 ° 21'12" and a Radius 1200.00,feet) 70.23 feet; thence South 77 West a distance 164.01 feet to a point on the West line of said Section 4; thence South 0 °40'12" East along the West line of Section 4 a distance 136.72 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above described land containing approximately 6.66 Acres. Situate in Spokane County, State of Washington. ar r i stS- ? 7 tt wASl4 • .•• /P 1 . . g 150 bbf►r:( i;O ^ Z0 DECLARATION.OFJ'PC'VECTIVE COVENANTS VALLEY VISTA'ESTATi_S ff.•* i . 394 tl.4 � �) pia , KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Ralph and Gertrude Guthrie, a husband and wife, being owner of all lots in VALLEY VISTA ESTATES, the County of Spokane, State of Washington, as per map thereof recoi•ded`in the office -of the County Auditor of said county do hereby declare the_following protective covenants and conditions for the use and benefit of all said property which they own and for the use and benefit of each and every purchaser of any of said-property: A. LAND USE AND BUILDING TYPE: No lot shall be used except for residential purposes. No building shall be erected, altered, placed, or permitted to remain on any lot other than one single family dwelling not to exceed two stories in height. A double car garage must be constructed with each residence. B. DWELLING SIZE: The main floor area of the main structures, exclusive of any one story open porches and garages shall not be less than 1200 square feet. All swellings shall have cedar shingle or shake roofs. C. BUILDING LOCATION: No building shall be located on any lot nearer to the front lot line, side lot line, or nearer to the flanking street line that the minimum building set back line, as provided for in Chapter 4.04A090. D. EASEMENTS: Easements for installations and maintenance of utilities and drainage facilities are reserved as shwn, if any; on the recorded plat and over the rear five feet of each lot. Within these easement areas no structure, planting or other material shall be placed or permitted to- remain which may damage or interfere with the installation and maintenance of utilities, or which may change the direction flow of drainage channel heeasements, or which may obstruct or retard the flow of water through drainage channels in the easements. The easement area of each lot and all improvements in ieshall be maintained continuously by the owner of the lot, except for those improvements for which a public authority or utility company is responsible. E. NUISANCES: No noxious or offensive activity shall be carried on upon any lot, nor shall anything be done thereon which may be or may become an annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood. F. TEMPORARY STRUCTURES: No structures of a temporary character, trailer, basement, tent, shack, garage, barn or other outbuilding shall be used on any lot at any time as a residence either temporarily or permanently. G. SIGNS: No signs of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any lot except one sign of not more than five square feet advertising the property for sale or rent, or signs used by a builder to advertise the property during the construction and sales period. H. LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY: No animals, livestock or poultry of any kind shall be raised, bred or kept on any lot, except that dogs, cats, or other household pets may be kept, provided that they are not kept, bred or maintained for any commercial purpose. No household pet may be kept if, in the opinion of any five lot owners, the pet is a public nuisance. [. GARBAGE AND REFUSE DISPOSAL: No lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground for rubbish, trash, garbage or other waste shall not he kept except in sanitary containers. All incinerators or other equipment for the storage of disposal of such material shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition. • j• TERM: These covenants are to run with the land and shall be binding on MI parties and all persons claiming under them for a period of thirty years front the date these covenants are recorded after which time said covenant shall be automatically extend for successive periods of 10 years, unless an instrument signed by a majority of the then owners of the lots has been recorded, agreeing to change said covenants in whole or part. The undersigned as subdivider reserves the right to change or eliminate any of these restrictions at any time if in their sole judgement such change or elimination is desirable, up until all lots are sold. This shall be accomplished by recording written notice of change or elimination. PTF,S ' 7 55 39 VPI , i fGf,E 2395 c K. ENFORCEMENT: Enforcement shall be. by proceedings at law or in equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant either to restrain violation or to recover damages. - L. SIVERABILITY: Invalidation of any one of these covenants by judgement or court order shall in no way affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. M. COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.; Any dwelling or structure erected or placed on any lot in this subdivision shall be completed as to external, appearance including finished painting within 9 months after date of commencement of construction. N. RESIDENCE VALUE: No residence shall be constructed in this plat that has a today's market value of less than $95,000.00 including lot. O. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT: All lot purchasers, their heirs or assigns agree not to protest any future subdivision or development of adjacent properties owned by the subdivider, his heirs or assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE UNDERSIGNED set their seals this .' -tday of f L� *NE ,1985. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ' ) ss. County of Spokane ) Ralph Guthrie A / r Gertrude Guthrie r On this day personally appeared before me / 4_,,Ohe " /E rJoe - wT/fR' /E— to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing .. ' instrument, and acknowledged that T'/4 -may signed the same as ` 6 fl e • free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein men d `/ : . GIVEN under my hand and official seal this d -1� day of h R Ott I Nota$y in and for,the State of Washington, residing at( f t qi: 99(..0,1/ g g .e- �i.rw _ F ILED UR RECO :I EEM pcgiIF;r . Guthrie Investtnent.6 JUN 6 3 27 PH '85 WILW,N U. DONAHUE AUDITOR a.(j; 'SPOKANE. COUNTY, WASH.' DEPUTY E 9211 Trent 99206 STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT The Grantors Ralph D. Guthrie and Gertrude 0. Guthrie, husband and wife, of the County of Spokane, State of Washington, for and in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) to them in hand paid, and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grants to Spokane -- County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, an Easement over,.under, upon and across the hereinafter described lands situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washington: A strip of land 15 feet wide in Government Lot 9, Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M., being 7.5 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning at :the most Northerly Point of Lot 1, Block 1, of Valley Vista Estates; thence South 45 °52'20" East along the Easterly line of said Lot 1 a distance 67.36 feet to the True Point of Beginning for this description; thence North 12 13'06" West a distance 25.65 feet; thence North 48 ° 45'09" West a distance 47.59 feet to the Southerly Right -of -way line of Ponderosa Drive and there Terminating this description. Situate in Spokane County, State of Washington. The Easement granted to Spokane County and its authorized agents is for the sole purposes of allowing natural "drainage and /or runoff over and across the above described lands. The grantors hereby agree not to obstruct, artificially collect or discharge the flow across or adjacent to the above described lands. The grantors agree that Spokane County accepts no responsibility for maintaining the drainage Easement. The grantors accept complete and total responsibility for the construction and perpetual maintenance of the facilities located within this drainage Easement per plans on file in the office of the Spokane County Engineer. The grantors hereby release Spokane County and all its officers, employees and agents from any responsibility or liability for any damage whatsoever, including inverse condemnation by or to any and all persons or property arising out of or in any way incident to or attributable to the storm drainage within said Easement. The Easement described hereinabove is to and shall run with the land. No modification of the boundaries of said Easement can be made without the prior approval of Spokane County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have hereunto set our hands this of . 19 . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss SPOKANE COUNTY j j day On this Till day of ( l u,,,. _ , 1985, personally appeared before 0 me known to me to he the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes herein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. N. ary Public, in an' for the atate of Washington, residing in Spokane; WA. r STATE OF WASHINGTON ). ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal day of 19 . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED THE GRANTOR, Ralph D. Guthrie and Gertrude 0. Guthrie, husband and wife/ for and in consideration of mutual benefits, in hand paid, conveys to SPOKANE COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON, the following described real estate, situated in the COUNTY of SPOKANE, State of Washington: A portion of land in Government Lot 9, in Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M., Spokane, County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 9; thence North 00 ° 40'12" West along the West line of said Section 4, a distance of 650.99 feet to the True Point of Beginning for this description. Said point being a point of a Non - Tangent curve having a Radial Bearing South 4 10'39" East; thence along a curve to the right (having a Delta 8 ° 28'03" and a Radius of 440.00 feet)_ 65.03 feet; thence South 85 ° 42'36" East a distance of 545.76 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a Delta of 50 ° 09'44" and a Radius of 380.00 feet) 332.69 feet; thence North 44 07'40" East a distance of 365.66 feet to a point of a curve; thence along a curve to the left (having a Delta .26° 02 and a Radius 380.00 feet) 172.72 feet; thence North 18 ° 05'09" East a distance of 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 7 07'47" and a Radius 440.00 feet) 54.75 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve. Said point having a •Radial Bearing North 64 47'04" West; thence South 81 ° 17'57" West a distance. 34.61 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the left (having a Delta 21 ° 18'41" and a Radius 135.00 feet) 50.21 feet; thence South 59 59'17" West a distance 125.94 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the left (having a Delta 36 10'42" and a Radius 135.00 feet) 85.24 feet; thence South 23 ° 48'35" West a distance 39.35 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 32 ° 08'54" and a Radius 230.00 feet) 129.05 feet; thence South 55 57'29" West a distance 222.49 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 37 26'29" and a Radius 230.00 feeet) 150.30 feet; thence North 86 ° 36'02" West a distance of 276.68 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the left (having a Delta 19 and a Radius 225.00 feet) 76.86 feet; thence South 73 49'37" West a distance 63.38 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 3 21'12" and a Radius 1200.00 feet) 70.23 feet; thence South 77 ° 10'49" West a distance 164.01 feet to a point on the West line of said Section 4; thence South 0 40'12" East along the West line of Section 4 a distance 136.72 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above described land containing approximately 6.66 acres. Situate in Spokane County, Sta of Washington. Dated this 7 day of 22-4K2_ . , 19. (SEAL) h.Lai_ . 67 &I-04/ . 9`�'uaJ«.�r><* s • Dear Sir: Transamerica- Title Services Guthrie Investments E. 9211 Trent Attn: Art NQ11 R ECEIVED JUN 0 5 7985 Coont% tofteeri Transamerica Title Insurance Compan, North 720 Argonne Road Spokane, Washington 99212 (509) 922-2222 ■ SECOND CERTIFICATE TO PLAT Order No. JS- 118603M Certificate for Filing Plat of VALLEY VISTA ESTATES In the matter of the plat to be submitted to Spokane County for approval, this Company has examined the records of the Spokane County Auditor's Office and County Clerk's Office, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Court holding terms in said County, and from such examin- ation hereby certifies that the following described land, to wit: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Government lot 9; thence N00 °40'12 "W along the West line of said Section 4, a distance of 433.08 feet to the True Point of beginning for this description. Thence continuing N00 ° 40'12 "W a distance 217.91 feet to a point of a Non - Tangent curve having a Radial Bearing S4 °10'39 "E; thence along a curve to the right (having a delta 8 °28'03" and a radius of 440.00 feet) 65.03 feet; thence S85 °42'36 "E - 545.76 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta of 50 °09'44" and a radius 380.00 feet) 332.69 feet; thence N44 °07'40" W a distance of 365.66 feet to a point of a curve; thence along a 'curve to the left (having a delta 26 ° 02'31" and a radius 380.00 feet) 172.72 feet; thence N18 °05'09 "E - 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a delta 14 °45'45" and a radius 440.00 feet) 113.37 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve. Said point having a Radial Bearing S57 ° 09'06 "E; thence N89 ° 12 57 "E - 73.72 feet; thence S35 ° 14'39 "W - 24.97 feet to a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta 17 ° 09'30" and a radius 380.00 feet) 113.80 feet; thence S18 ° 05'09 "W - 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a delta of 19 ° 30'00" and a radius 440.00 feet) 149.75 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve having a Radial Bearing N52 ° 24'51 "W; thence S45 °52'20 "E - 199.86 feet; thence S44 °07'40 "E - 356.00 feet; thence S47 °09 "W a distance 165.22 feet; thence S62 ° 25'24W a distance 139.16 feet; thence S23 °46'32 "E - 287.22 feet; thence S01 °21'03 "W - 50.00 feet; thence N88 °38 57 "W - 224.77 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a delta 36 °33'16" and a radius 355. feet) 226.49 feet; thence N52 °05'41 "W - 149.10 feet; thence S37 °54'19 "W - 170.00 feet; thence N52 °05'41 "W - 149.09 feet; thence N48 °15'43 "W - 308.08 feet to the point of beginning. • VESTED IN: RALPH D. GUTHRIE and GERTRUDE O. GUTHRIE, husband and wife. EXCEPTIONS: . Order No. JS- 118603M Page 2 SECOND PLAT CERTIFICATE A. General taxes as follows, together with interest and penalty, if any, after delinquency: Tax Account No. Year 04442 -9083 1983 1984 1985 Annual Billing $371.98 $369.65 $372.18 NOTE: 1985 assessed valuation: Land $27,980.00 Amount Paid $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Balance Due $371.98 $369.65 $372.18 B. Assessment for Road Improvement District No. 418, the amounts of which are not yet available. 1. WATER SYSTEM AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Between: The Washington Water Power Company, a corporation And: Guthrie Investments Incorporated Purpose: Provide rights of way for water and electric facilities Dated: May 31, 1973 Recording No.: 224577C 2. MORTGAGE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Mortgagor: Ralph D. Guthrie and Gertrude 0. Guthrie, husband and wife, and Valley Vista Conva- lescent Center, a corporation Commerce Mortgage Company, a corporation $287,500.00 March 23, 1977 March 30, 1977 7703300276 This and other property Mortgagee: Amount: Dated: Recorded: Recording No.: Affects: Records examinaed as to May 29, 1985 at 8:00 A.M. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By: » Z. A L� Jim Stippel Title Officer pds cc: County Planning County Engineers .A . BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 84 0857 IN THE MATTER OF ) SPOKANE COUNTY ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 418 ) IMPROVEMENT OF PONDEROSA DRIVE AND GERTRUDE DRIVE ) Resolution Creating a Road IN A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 9 IN SECTION 4, ) TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 44 E.W.M. (TO BE ) AS VALLEY VISTA ESTATES - P.E.#1407) A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington providing for the improvement of Ponderosa Drive and Gertrude Drive in a portion of Government Lot 9 in Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 E.W.M. (to be known as Valley Vista Estates - P.E. #1407) by grading, constructing drainage appurtenances, driveway approaches, sidewalk and curb, paving with asphalt concrete and by doing all work necessary in connection therewith, all in accordance with Resolution No. 84 -0739 passed and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County on the 28th day of August, 1984; declaring the sufficiency of the petition of said improvement; creating Spokane County Road Improvement District No. 418; stating the portion of the cost of said improvement which shall be paid by cash or assessment upon the property of said District and the mode of payment; and directing the County Road Engineer to proceed with the improvement and to prepare and file an assessment roll. WHEREAS Resolution No. 84 -0739, passed and adopted on the 28th day of August, 1984, de- claring the intention of the Board to order the improvement of Ponderosa Drive and Gertrude Drive in a portion of Government Lot 9 in Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 E.W.M. (to be known as Valley Vista Estates - P.E. #1407) by grading, constructing drain- age appurtenances, driveway approaches, sidewalk and curb, paving with asphalt concrete and by doing such other work as may be necessary in connection therewith, and fixing a time for the hearing therein, and WHEREAS said Resolution of Intention was duly published and the due notice of hearing was given as required by law, and WHEREAS the County Road Engineer has certified that the petition for this improvement, including all withdrawals therefrom and additions thereton made prior to 5:00 o'clock p.m. of the day prior to said hearing, has been signed by the owners of 100 percent of the lineal frontage upon the improvement to be made, and 100 percent of the area with- in the limits of the proposed assessment district, and WHEREAS the said hearing was held as provided in said notice and after hearing and consid- ering written and verbal suggestions and recommendations of various property owners within the district, the Board has ascertained that the petition is sufficient, and has ascer- tained that the plan of improvements within the limits of the district is feasible and has determined to order the construction of said improvement, now THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washing- ton as follows: Section 1. The following roads as described below shall be improved by grading, con- structing drainage appurtenances, driveway approaches, sidewalk and curb, paving with asphalt concrete and by doing such work as may be necessary in connection therewith: PONDEROSA DRIVE - from a line 150 lineal feet Southwesterly of the centerline of 50th Court to a line approximately 113 lineal feet West of Gertrude Drive. GERTRUDE DRIVE - from Ponderosa Drive to the Easterly property line of Lot 6, Block 1 of said addition. Resolution No. 84 0857 Section 2. It is hereby found and declared that the petition filed herein for the aforesaid improvement including all additions thereto or withdrawals therefrom made prior to five o'clock p.m., of the day before the said hearing is sufficient and it is found that the plan of construction as hereinbefore outlined is feasible and the benefits to be derived therefrom by the property within the proposed district as hereinbefore outlined exceed the cost and expense of the contemplated improvements. Section 3. There is hereby established a road improvement district in the County to be known and designed as "Spokane County Road Improvement District No. 418 which said district shall include all the property between the termini of said improvements. (SEE ATTACHED SHEET) Section 4. It is deemed that the nature of improvement contemplated for said dis- trict is such that the special benefits conferred on the property of the district are not fairly reflected by the use of the zone and termini assessment method and that for the purposes of said district the assessments shall be made against the property of the district in accordance with the special benefits it will derive from the improvement without regard to the zone and termini method, such special benefits to be measured by use of the frontage area assessment method in accordance with Resol- ution No. 62 -309 passed and adopted the 12th day of July, 1962. Section 5. The County Engineer is hereby directed to establish a reimbursable pro- ject to provide moneys from the County Road Fund for the payment of all costs and expenses of the construction of said improvement and, upon the determination of said costs and expenses, to prepare and file with the Clerk of the Board of County Commis- sioners an assessment roll for the costs of said improvement to be assessed against the property included in the assessment district herein created. He is also directed to prepare plans and specifications under which the proposed improvement will be constructed and issue a Call for Bids upon the same. Section 6. The Total Project Cost shall be the sum of the following items of cost: (1) Contract amount as determined by the lowest bid on which the contract is awarded: (2) Engineering being 15 percent of the contract Amount and Contingencies being 10 percent of the contract amount; (3) Interim financing cost - $6,799.65; (4) Publishing Costs - $140.00; (5) Bond Attorney Fee - $2,039.90; (6) Closing Costs - $400.00; (7) Bond Costs - $2,139.90; (8) Treasurer's Fee - $6.00. The total project cost shall be apportioned as follows: Eighty -Five percent (85 %) of the total project cost shall be borne by assessment against the properties benefited and included in the district hereinbefore created, and.fifteen percent (15 %) of the total project cost to be borne by the County Road Fund. In addition, the County Road Fund shall pay such actual construction costs, if any, which are in excess of the contract amount. Except as otherwise provided here- in, Spokane County shall not be liable in manner for any portion of the costs and expenses of said improvement district. . 84 0857 Parcel II 04442 -9083 ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 418 • 04 -24 -44 W 1/2 of Gov. Lot 9 in N 1/2 Exc. platted ptn. Parcel U 04444 -9107 04 -24 -44 W 1/2 of "E 1/2 of Gov. Lot 9 exc. ptn..DAF; Beg at pt on N In of Gov. Lot 170 ft. M/L W of NW cor. of sd W 1/2 of E 1/2 of Lot 9; thence S 27 ° 10'45" E 215 ft. MIL; thence E 100 ft.; thence N 12 ° 12'20" to N in of Lot 9; thence W alg In to POB. Resolution No. 84 0857 Section 7. That there be and is hereby created in the office of the Spokane County treasurer two funds of the County to be known and designated as "Spokane County Road Improvement District No. 418 Construction Fund," and "Spokane County Road Improvement District No. 418 Bond Fund." The Spokane County Road Fund shall be reimbursed for all costs and expenses incurred by reason of the District except those costs or portions of costs which Spokane County agrees to bear as hereinbefore stated. Such reimbursement shall be made by the issu- ance of warrants against the Spokane County Improvement District No. 418 Construction Fund. All moneys collected by the County Treasurer upon any assessments levied for the con- struction of said improvement shall be placed in the said Construction Fund during the thirty (30) day period allowed for payment of such assessment without penalty or interest and shall be placed in the said Bond fund thereafter. Bonds of said improve- ment district, payable on or before twelve years from date of issuance, shall be sold in the amount sufficient to reduce all outstanding warrants against aforesaid con- struction fund for that portion of the cost and expenses of the installation of said improvement to be assessed against the property within the district after determining the amount of such assessments paid within the thirty (30) day period allowed for payment of assessments without penalty of interest. The interest charged on the unpaid assessments shall be the same rate as the rate of interest the Road Improvement District bonds shall bear. PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, 'Washington, this 2nd day of October, 1984. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE CLERK OF THE- OARD BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON WHEREAS, the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee approved the preliminary plat and zone change PS- 1407 -81, Valley:Vista Estates, and ZS -40 -81 (Unclassified to R -1) subject to certain conditions, one being #15 within the Findings and Order which condition provided materially as follows: 1115. That the plat sponsor shall set aside in an escrow account, payable to Spokane County upon demand, the amount of $500.00 per lot for the exclusive purpose of helping to construct a railroad crossing of the Union Pacific Rail- road in the vicinity of said plat; WHEREAS, Guthrie Investments, Inc. is desirous of finalizing PS- 1407 -81, Valley Vista Estates and ZS -40 -81 (Unclassified to R -1) and in conjunction with the same of meeting condition #15 referenced in the immediately preceeding recital by assigning a savings certificate to Spokane County. NOW, THEREFOR, for and in consideration of meeting condition #15 within the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Findings and Order, a photo copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment "A" and incorporated herein by reference as if fully repeated herein, GUTHRIE INVESTMENTS, INC., a Washington corporation hereby assigns to Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, the following: Savings Certificate Number 9715 -475 -1 in the face amount of $6,000.00 and held in and by the Old National Bank of Washington, located at Spokane, Washington .Corporate Banking Department Any interest benefits accruing under said savings certificate shall remain the property of Guthrie Investments, Inc. Guthrie Investments, Inc. authorizes Old National Bank or Washington to release all moneys within the above savings certificate, exclusive of interest earnings as provided for herein, to Spokane County upon receipt of written request signed by the Spokane County Engineer referencing the savings certificate number and including a statement that the moneys will be used exclusively and solely for the purpose of meeting condition #15. But for releasing the savings certificate as set forth in this document, neither the savings certificate nor any moneys within said savings certificate shall be released to any other party without the prior written consent and agreement of Spokane County. DATED this 4th day of A S S I G N M E N T BANK OF OLD NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Spokane County Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee on July 19, 1984 and the members of the Committee present being Jerry Williams, Chairperson, Kathy Carstens and Ron McVicers. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Guthrie Investments, is requesting an "Extension of Time" of preliminary plat of PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES, and Zone Change ZS- 40 -81, Unclassified to R -1 and there being present, the following applicant or representative: C. FINDINGS OF FACT SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER ART NOLL 1. That the proposal and information presented in the STAFF REPORT was considered. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as SUBURBAN at "Urban Transition ". 3. That the proposal is within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. 4. That the proposal does comply with the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan decision guidelines for "fill -in" development and compatible land uses. 5. That substantial progress toward finalizing the final plat has been made. 6. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapproval of this proposed use. 7. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 8. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 9. That the Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposal as conditioned is not detrimental to the general purpose or otherwise harmful to the public health, safety, and welfare. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER FILE: PS- 1407 -81 D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS DECISION Those conditions as listed in the July 19, 1984 STAFF REPORT. E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application for Time Extension for Preliminary Plat PS- 1407 -81, Valley Vista Estates, and Zone Change ZS- 40 -81, from Unclassified to R -1, is hereby APPROVED to August 1, 1985. Motion by: Ron McVickers Seconded by: Kathy Carsons Jerry Williams - Aye . Kathy Carsons - Aye Ron McVickers - Aye ATTEST: By: Date: JOHN NUNNERY Spokane County Subdivision Administrator HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER AND VOTE. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 9 A.M. (or as soon thereafter as possible) July 19, 1984, Thursday TIME EXTENSION 1 . PS- 1407 -81 ZS- 40 -81, SHORT PLAT APPEAL VALLEY VISTA ESTATES Page 2 Unclassified to ii-1 2. SP -84 -299, Short Plat $y Eugene Schlender PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE 1kECLASSIFICATION 3. PN- 1471 -84 ZN -80 -84 4. PN- 1470 -84 ZN -79 -84 PUDN -5 -84 1:30 P.M. (or as soon 5. PE- 1469 -84 ZE -81 -84 BAKER A}iDITION Page 18 Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban WAIKIICI VIEW RIDGE Page 32 Agri /ultural Suburban to R-2 Planned Unit Development thec'eafter as possible) DAY -BREAK ESTATES Page 48 Agricultural to R -1 _ TIME: Thursday,/ July 19, 1984, 9 A.M. PLACE: Broadway Building 2nd F16or, Public Hearing Room N. 721 Jefferson St., Spokane,WA. 1 Page 6 Guthrie Investments E. 9211 Trent Avenue Spokane, WA 99206 II. SPECIAL INFORMATION STAFF REPORT July 19., 1984 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF RE: EXTENSION OF TIME for PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES ZS- 40 -81, Unclassified to R -1 I. GENERAL INFORMATION Sponsor: 926 -1561 Surveyor /Engineer: 926 -5959 3 Gene Welborn E. 7011 2nd Avenue Spokane, WA 99206 Location: The proposal is located south of the "Ponderosa Area" of the Spokane Valley being approximately 1/4 mile west of Dishman -Mica Highway, south and adjacent the southerly terminus of Ponderosa Drive; within Section 4, Township 24N, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. Comprehensive Plan: SUBURBAN at "Urban Transition" within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. History: The proposal was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee May 1981 under the provisions of State law for the three -year time extensions. The sponsor indicated that substantial progress had been made and was granted a one year time extension May 1983, since it was anticipated the plat would be completed that year. Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "Extension of Time" of the preliminary plat approval; that work has been completed and progress is being made toward finalizing this proposal. The sponsor indicates Engineering delays regarding the site drainage and roads; however, everything is currently either completed and being finished for submittal. The Draft Final Plat is nearly ready for final departmental review. 11. SPECIAL INFORMATION (cont'd) No additional comments are being recommended by any of the review departments. Staff is recommending that at one year extension be granted, since the proposal does comply with the Comprehensive Plan "Urban Transition ", since the policy for "fill -in" development is being met and substantial progress toward finalizing the plat has been made. III. CONDITIONS PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 4 1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record. 2: That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for one (1) year to August 1, 1985. The applicant may request a one (1) year extension of time by submitting a written request forty - five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. Such appli- cations should demonstrate the progress made toward finalizing this preliminary plat. If a time extension is not requested in a timely manner or a time extension is not granted, then the preliminary plat approval is NULL & VOID. w kay 5, 1983 No. PS 1407 - 81 Findings E Order - Va iiey Vista Estates A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee on May 5, 1983 and the members of the Committee present being Ron McVicker, Chairperson, Ken Kennedy and Lynn Tennican. B. PROPOSAL SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER The sponsor, Guthrie Investments, Inc., is requesting approval of an Extension of Time for PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES, and Zone Change ZS- 40 -81, Unclassified to R -I for subdivision of 11 acres into 12 lots for single - fancily dwellings, and there being present, the following applicant or representative: Art Noll C. FINDINGS OF FACT I. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 2. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 3. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapproval of the proposed Extension of Time. 4. That the information in the STAFF REPORT was considered. 5. That substantial progress has been made toward finalization of this preliminary plat and will be finalized Summer of 1983. 6. That this proposal does constitute "fill -in" development for the SUBURBAN category, for the Priority Sewer Service Area, and for existing public services and Facilities in the vicinity. D. SPECIAL EXPLANATION OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS DECISION Those conditions as listed in the May 5, 1983 STAFF REPORT, as amended below. PLANNING CONDITIONS 2. That the preliminary plat he given one (1) additional year conditional approval to June 1, 1984. M.- 5,' 1983 - & Order E. ORDER ATTEST: By: Date: The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of PS- 1407 -81, Valley Vista Estates, and Zone Change ZS - 40 - 81, Unclassified to R -1 for an Extension of Time is hereby APPROVED to June 1, 1984. Motion by: Ken Kennedy Seconded by: Lynn Tennican Vote: Unanimous Ron McVicker - Aye Ken Kennedy - Aye Lynn Tennican - Aye JOHN NUNNERY Subdivision Administrator HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDFR AND VOTE. Chairperson Iln. PS 1407-81 Va.,ey Vista Estates Hearing Examiner Committ Sponsor: 928 -0600 Gordon Curry 9209 E. Trent Spokane, WA 99206 ctions - May 5, 1983 5. PE- 1306A -79, SUNRISE EAST 1ST AUDITION ZE- 111-79, Agricultural to Agricultural and R -1 Location: The proposal is located in the Otis Orchards area south and adjacent Wellesley Ave. and east and adjacent Lynden Ave.; within Section 3, Township 25N, Range 45 EWM., Spokane County, Washington Comprehensive Plan: URBAN Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 6 acres into 7 lots for single - family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 6 acres from Agricultural to Agricultural and R-1. Action: Unanimous approval for onl one additional year. 6. PN 1355 - 79, PEONE PRAIRIE ESTATES 3RD ADDITION ZN- 249 -79, Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban and R -1 Sponsor: 466 -6271 466 -3184 J.E. Upham 6 E.M. Jones '- Rt. 3 Box 9 Rt. 3 Box 10 Mead, WA 99021 Mead, WA 99021 Location: The proposal is located in the Mead area adjacent and between Farwell and Peone Roads and 1/4 mile west of Fairview Road; within Section 11, Township 26N, Range 43 EWM., Spokane County, Washington Comprehensive Plan: SUBURBAN Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an '.'extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 63 acres into 62 lots for single - family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 63 acres from Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban and R -1. Action: Unanimous approval for oniy one additional year. 7. PE - 1371 - 80, MONACO ADDITION ZE- 63 -80, Agricultural to Commercial Sponsor: 926 -6277 Eugene Monaco E. 14820 Sprague Ave Spokane, WA 99216 - 3 - Surveyor /Engineer: 926 -1322 Richard L. Simpson N. 909 Argonne Rd. Spokane, WA 99206 Surveyor /Engineer:. 534 `"' ' Mike Senski ..5. 104 Freya Spokane,, WA 99262 Surveyor /Engineer: 535 -1410 Patrick J. Moore • S. 25 Altamont Spokane, WA 99202 Location: The proposal is located in the Spokane Valley south and adjacent Sprague Ave. and between Adams and Progress Roads, within Section 23, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM., Spokane County, Washington Comprehensive Plan: COMMERCIAL Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 2.29 acres into 2 lots for commercial use and to change the zoning on the 2.29 acres from Agricultural to Commercial. Action: Unan_1mo a_aaoroval for_3 vears. Hea,ring'Examiner Uric Actions - May 5, 1983 8. PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES ZS- 40 -81, Unclassified to R -1 Sponsor: 926 -1561 Guthrie Investments, Inc. E. 9211 Trent Spokane, WA 99206 Location: The proposal is west of the Dishman -Mica Section 4, Township 24, Comprehensive Plan: SUBURBAN Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 11 acres into 12 lots for single- family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 11 acres from Unclassified to R -1. Action: 9. PE-1409 -81, ZE- 66 -81, Sponsor: 456 -8819 Harold Lundy 5. 1115 Cedar Spokane, WA 99204 Location: The proposal is located on the Spokane Valley lying north of the Trent section; within Section 31 b 32, Township 26N, Range 45 Surveyor /Engineer: 926 - 5959 Gene Wrlborn E. 7011 2nd Spokane, WA 99206 located in the Ponderosa area and 1/4 mile Rd. and Mohawk Drive intersection within Range 44 EWM., Spokane County, Washington Unanimous approval for only one additional year. MONTE DEL REY 1ST ADDITION Agricultural to Agricultural, R -1 and Multiple Family Suburban Comprehensive Plan: URBAN Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 72 acres into 103 lots for single- family dwellings and multiple family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 72 acres from Agricultural to Agricultural, R -1 and Multiple Family Suburban, as approved. Action: Unanimous approval for o one additional year. 4 Surveyor /Engineer: 327 -7793 Gerald Masgai N. 2919 Monroe Spokane, WA 99205 south - facing slopes of the and Barker Road inter- EWM., Spokane County, WA' TO: FROM: RE: STAFF REPORT May 5, 1983 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF EXTENSION OF TIME for PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES ZS- 40 -81, Unclassified to R -1 I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Sponsor: 926 -1561 Surveyor /Engineer:. 926 - 5959 Guthrie Investments, Inc. Gene Welborn E. 9211 Trent E. 7011 2nd Spokane, WA 99206 Spokane, WA 99206 B. Location: The proposal is located in the Ponderosa area and 1/4 mile west of the Dishman -Mica Rd. and Mohawk Drive intersection; within Section 4, Township 24N, Range 44 EWM., Spokane County, Washington C. Comprehensive Plan: SUBURBAN D. History: The proposal was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee May 1981 under the provisions of State law for the three -year time extensions. The sponsor indicates the substantial progress has been made; as, part .of the surveying is complete, the water plan is finished and approved, the road and drainage plans are being redesigned and working with County Engineer's Department. The sponsor is planning to finalize this preliminary plat this summer. E. Proposal: The sponsor is' requesting an "extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 11 acres into 12 lots for single-family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 11 acres from Unclassified to R -1. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION The Planning Department had recommended that this preliminary plat approval be brought into conformance with the then new RCW 58.17 regarding the amount of time allowed before a preliminary plat must be finalized. State law allowed a preliminary plat three (3) years (without any new conditions) and allows one extension of time for one year, if the sponsor requests the additional year; however, this 4th year may have new conditions added. Three yearshave passed and the sponsor having made progress is now asking for the additional year extension of approval. No other additional conditions of approval are being recommended by the remaining departments. 31 STAFF REPORT, May 5, 198 PS- 1407 -81 III. CONDITIONS If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. PLANNING CONDITIONS 1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record. 2. That the preliminary plat be given one (1) additional year conditional approval to June 1, 1984. That lcs ° to law are .asaeade preliminary plat approval will become NULL E VOID after the above expiration date and a new application and hearing will be required. 17 30 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER No. PS- 1407-81 ZS -40 -81 INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on May 28, 1981 and the members of the Committee present being Ken Kennedy, Chairperson, Kathy Carstens and Jerry Williams. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Robert Bethards, is requesting approval of a preliminary plat and zone change, PS- 1407 -81, Valley Vista Estates and ZS- 40 -81; Unclassified to R -1 for subdivision of 10.88 acres into 12 lots for single family dwellings and there being present, the following applicant or representative: STAN SCHULTZ AND ROBERT J. BETHARDS C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is vacant. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Suburban Category. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Unclassified. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guide- lines (wAC 197-10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assess- ment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the phusical environment; a finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of this project; and a final declaration of non -significance is hereby to be issued. b. That this project and ownership is separate from the adjacent 300 acres to the south and that the fee established for a future railroad crossing is adequate to provide the transportation facilities necessary for this area. That piecemeal development is not desirable for this area, however, legal requirements of the SEPA guidelines leads the Committee to issue a final declaration of non - significance. ORDER 5. 4. That appropriate street names be indicated. 2 No. PS- 1407 -81 13-40-81 The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Robert Bethards for the determination of SEPA requirements as described in the application should be issued a final declaration of non - significance. Motion by: Williams Seconded by: Carstens Vote: Unanimously to issue a final declaration of non - significance. E. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda (tern have been fulfilled. 2. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 3. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 4. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use is not detrimental to the general purpose or otherwise, harmful to the public health, safety, and welfare. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor dis- approval of the proposed use. F. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS SUBDIVISION APPROVAL: PLANNING CONDITIONS i. That the plat be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and /or attached sheets as noted. 2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one dwelling unit be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. 3. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be 'held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) 5. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. No. PS- 1407 -81 ZS -40 -81 6. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to appli- cation for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. 7. That a certificate of title be - furnished` the Planning Department prior to the filing of the final plat. 8. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolu- tion #77 -1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improve- ments. 9. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 10. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197-10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the phusical environment; a finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of this project; and a final declaration of non - significance is hereby to be issued. 11. There will be no phasing of the project, and the plat will be finalized in its entirety unless approved by the Subdivision Administrator. No. PS- 1407 -81 ZS -40 -81 12. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to June 1, 1983, a time extension public hearing before the Hearing Examiner Committee may be required after one year if new conditions are recommended because of an administrative review by agencies of jurisdiction. The project sponsor is responsible for requesting an Extension of Time prior to June 1, 1983. 13. Thal upon filing of the final plat, the zoning shall be changed to Single Family Residential (R -1). ENGINEER CONDITIONS 1. That the proposed plat is subject to the provisions of Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution #80-1592 as amended. 2. That conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer is given subject to dedication of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 3. That plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. That drainage plaris and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing _of the. final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 5. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certifi- cate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 6. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right -of -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 7. All construction within the existing or proposed public right -of -way is to be ,completed prior to filing plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, con- struction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 8. That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. 9. Road design, construction, and drainage control for half right -of -ways and stub road connections are the responsibility of the Developer. HEALTH CONDITIONS F No. PS- 1407-81 ZS -40-81 10. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded. A 1 foot strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de 'sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) 11. That individual driveway access permits be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. 12. That all public roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifi- cations of the County Engineer. 13. Public Road Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section: Section Number 2 For Ponderosa Drive Minimum Paving width Collector Arterial Std. Section Number 2 For Cul -de -sac. Street Minimum Paving width Local Access Std. 14. That Ponderosa Drive be extended to the westerly plat boundary parallel with and adjacent to Lot 1, Block 2. That the plat sponsor shall set aside in an escrow account, Payable to Spokane County upon demand, the amount of $500.00 per lot for the ex- clusive purpose of helping to construct a railroad crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad in the vicinity of said plat. 1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and /or attached sheets as noted. 2 Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the prelimin- ary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, County Engineer, and Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the fianl plat. 3. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 4. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water supplier. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conform- ance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. • No. PS- 1407 -81 ZS -40 -81 5. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to appli- cation for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfac- torily complete the approved water system. 6. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." 7. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health Officer prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. 8. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 9. The dedicatory language of the plat will state that: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, each lot is authorized the use of an individual on -site sewage system." No sewage system shall be allowed below the 2065 foot contour. 10. Water service must be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spo- kane County. 11. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health Services. UTILITY CONDITIONS 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution #80-0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authoriza- tion is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The owner, his heirs and successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. 4. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area - wide collection systems. 6 BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water is re- quired. A plot plan showing water distribution and emergency vehicle access is required to be submitted for approval prior to any land develop- ment. G. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Robert Bethards for a preliminary plat and zone change, Valley Vista Estates, as described in the application, should be approved. Motion by: Carstens Seconded by: Williams Vote: Unanimous to approve (3 -0) Additional Findings: That the Committee's desire of no piecemeal developments be considered by the present adjacent owner. ATTEST: WALLIS D. HUBBARD • Planning ector Q ntr.____ MAY 20 ''/96/ By: Date: 7 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE No. PS- 1407 -81 ZS -40 -81 A S S I G N M E N T WHEREAS, the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee approved the preliminary plat and zone change PS- 1407 -81, Valley Vista Estates, and ZS -40 -81 (Unclassified to R -1) subject to certain conditions, one being 1115 within the Findings and Order which condition provided materially as follows: 1115. That the plat sponsor shall set aside in an escrow account, payable to Spokane County upon demand, the amount of $500.00 per lot for the exclusive purpose of helping to construct a railroad crossing of the Union Pacific Rail- road in the vicinity of said plat; WHEREAS, Guthrie Investments, Inc. is desirous of finalizing PS- 1407 -81, Valley Vista Estates and ZS -40-81 (Unclassified to R -1) and in conjunction with the same of meeting condition 1115 referenced in the immediately preceeding recital by assigning a savings certificate to Spokane County. NOW, THEREFOR, for and in consideration of meeting condition #15 within the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Findings and Order, a photo copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment "A" and incorporated herein by reference as if fully repeated herein, GUTHRIE INVESTMENTS, INC., a Washington corporation hereby assigns to Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, the following: Savings Certificate Number 9715 -475 -1 in the face amount of $6,000.00 and held in and by the Old National Bank of Washington, located at ; Trust Department. Any interest benefits accruing under said savings certificate shall remain the property of Guthrie Investments, Inc. Guthrie Investments, Inc. authorizes Old National Bank or Washington to release all moneys within the above savings certificate, exclusive of interest earnings as provided for herein, to Spokane County upon receipt of written request signed by the Spokane County Engineer referencing the savings certificate number and including a statement that the moneys will be used exclusively and solely for the purpose of meeting condition 1115. But for releasing the savings certificate as set forth in this document, neither the savings certificate nor any moneys within said savings certificate shall be released to any other party without the prior written consent and agreement of Spokane County. BANK OF DATED this day of , 198 President Secretary Developer A. INTRODUCTION SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER This matter having come before the Spokane County Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee on July 19, 1984 and the members of the Committee present being Jerry Williams, Chairperson, Kathy Carstens and Ron McVicers. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Guthrie Investments, is requesting an "Extension of Time" of preliminary plat of PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES, and Zone Change ZS- 40 -81, Unclassified to R -1 and there being present, the following applicant or representative: C. FINDINGS OF FACT ART NOLL 1. That the proposal and information presented in the STAFF REPORT was considered. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as SUBURBAN at "Urban Transition". 3. That the proposal is within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. 4. That the proposal does comply with the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan decision guidelines for "fill -in" development and compatible land uses. 5. That substantial progress toward finalizing the final plat has been made. 6. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapproval of this proposed use. 7. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 8. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 9. That the Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposal as conditioned is not detrimental to the general purpose or otherwise harmful to the public health, safety, and welfare. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER FILE: PS- 1407 -81 D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS DECISION Those conditions as listed in the July 19, 1984 STAFF REPORT.' E. ORDER ATTEST: By: Date: The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application for Time Extension for Preliminary Plat PS- 1407 -81, Valley Vista Estates, and Zone Change ZS- 40 -81, from Unclassified to R -1, is hereby APPROVED to August 1, 1985. Motion by: Ron McVickers Seconded by: Kathy Carsons Jerry Williams - Aye Kathy Carsons - Aye Ron McVickers - Aye JOHN NUNNERY Spokane County Subdivision Administrator HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER AND VOTE. airpe• on 5 2 STAFF REPORT July 19, 1984 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF RE: EXTENSION OF TIME for PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES ZS- 40 -81, Unclassified to R -1 I. GENERAL INFORMATION Sponsor: 926 -1561 Surveyor /Engineer: 926 -5959 Guthrie Investments E. 9211 Trent Avenue Spokane, WA 99206 Gene Welborn E. 7011 2nd Avenue Spokane, WA 99206 Location: The proposal is located south of the "Ponderosa Area" of the Spokane Valley being approximately 1/4 mile west of Dishman -Mica Highway, south and adjacent the southerly terminus of Ponderosa Drive; -- within Section 4, Township 24N, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. Comprehensive Plan: SUBURBAN at "Urban Transition" within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. History: The proposal was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee May 1981 under the provisions of State law for the three -year time extensions. The sponsor indicated that substantial progress had been made and was granted a one year time extension May 1983, since it was anticipated the plat would be completed that year. Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "Extension of Time" of the preliminary plat approval; that work has been completed and progress is being made toward finalizing this proposal. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION The sponsor indicates Engineering delays regarding the site drainage and roads; however, everything is currently either completed and being finished for submittal. The Draft Final Plat is nearly ready for final departmental review. 3 II. SPECIAL INFORMATION (cont'd) No additional comments are being recommended by any of the review departments. Staff is recommending that, at one year extension be granted, since the proposal does comply with the Comprehensive Plan "Urban Transition ", since the policy for "fill -in" development is being met and substantial progress toward finalizing the plat has been made. III. CONDITIONS PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record. 2. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for one (1) year to August 1, 1985. The applicant may request a one (1) year extension of time by submitting a written request forty - five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. Such appli- cations should demonstrate the progress made toward finalizing this preliminary plat. If a time extension is not requested in a timely manner or a time extension is not granted, then the preliminary plat approval is NULL & VOID. I No. PS- 1407 -81 ZS -40 -81 A. INTRODUCTION SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on May 28, 1981 and the members of the Committee present being Ken Kennedy, Chairperson, Kathy Carstens and Jerry Williams. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Robert Bethards, is requesting approval of a preliminary plat and zone change, PS- 1407 -81, Valley Vista Estates and ZS- 40 -81, Unclassified to R -1 for subdivision of 10.88 acres into 12 lots for single family dwellings and there being present, the following applicant or representative: STAN SCHULTZ AND ROBERT J. BETHARDS C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is vacant. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Suburban Category. ■ 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Unclassified. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guide- lines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assess- ment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the phusical environment; a • finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of this project; and a final declaration of non - significance is hereby to be issued. b. That this project and ownership is separate from the adjacent 300 acres to the south and that the fee established for a future railroad crossing is adequate to provide the transportation facilities necessary for this area. That piecemeal development is not desirable for this area, however, legal requirements of the SEPA guidelines leads the Committee to issue a final declaration of non- significance. 1 D. ORDER No. PS- 1407 -81 ZS -40 -81 The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Robert Bethards for the determination of SEPA requirements as described in the application should be issued a final declaration of non - significance. Motion by: Williams Seconded by: Carstens Vote: Unanimously to issue a final declaration of non- sighificance. E. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 2. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 3. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 4. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use is not detrimental to the general purpose or otherwise harmful to the public health, safety, and welfare. 5. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor dis- approval of the proposed use, F. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS SUBDIVISION APPROVAL: PLANNING CONDITIONS 3. That the plat be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and /or attached sheets as noted. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one dwelling unit be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A I' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) 4. That appropriate street names be indicated. 5. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 2 6. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will : be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to appli- cation for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. 48. T. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the filing of the final plat. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolu- tion #77 -1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improve- ments. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 10. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the phusical environment; a finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of this project; and a final declaration of non -. significance is hereby to be issued. 9. 11. There will be no phasing of the project, and the plat will be finalized in its entirety unless approved by the Subdivision Administrator. No. PS-1407 -81 ZS -40 -81 F No. PS- 1407-81 ZS -40 -81 12. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to June 1, 1983, a time extension public hearing before the Hearing Examiner Committee may be required after one year if new conditions are recommended because of an administrative review by agencies of jurisdiction. The project sponsor is responsible for requesting an Extension of Time prior to June 1, 1983. 13. That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning shall be changed to Single Family Residential (R -1). ENGINEER CONDITIONS 1. That the proposed plat is subject to the provisions of Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution #80 -1592 as amended. 2. That conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer is given subject to dedication of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 3. That plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of - -the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 5. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certifi- cate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 6. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right -of -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 7. All construction within the existing or proposed public right -of -way is to be completed prior to filing plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, con- struction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 8. That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. 9. Road design, construction, and drainage control for half right -of -ways and stub road connections are the responsibility of the Developer. 11. 5 No. PS- 1407 -81 Z5 -40 -81 10. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded. A 1 foot strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de 'sacs are required when streets terminate al the plat boundaries.) That individual driveway access permits be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. 12. That all public roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifi- cations of the County Engineer. 13. Public Road Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section: Section Number 2 For Ponderosa Drive Minimum Paving width Collector Arterial Std. Section Number 2 For Cul -de -sac Street Minimum Paving width Local Access Std. 14. That Ponderosa Drive be extended to the westerly plat boundary parallel with and adjacent to Lot 1, Block 2. That the plat sponsor shall set aside in an escrow account, Payable to Spokane County upon demand, the amount of $500.00 per lot for the ex- clusive purpose of helping to construct a railroad crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad in the vicinity of said plat. HEALTH CONDITIONS The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and /or attached sheets as noted. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the prelimin- ary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, County Engineer, and Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the fianl plat. 3. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 4. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water supplier. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conform- ance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. UTILITY CONDITIONS 6 No. PS- 1407 -81 ZS -40 -81 5. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to appli- cation for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfac- torily complete the approved water system. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." 7 A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health Officer prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. 8: Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. The dedicatory language of the plat will state that: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, each lot is authorized the use of an individual on -site sewage system." No sewage system shall be allowed below the 2065 foot contour. ie 10. Water service must be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spo- kane County. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health Services. 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution #80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authoriza- tion is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The owner, his heirs and successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. 4. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area - wide collection systems. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water is re- quired. A plot plan showing water distribution and emergency vehicle access is required to be submitted for approval prior to any land develop- ment. G. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Robert Bethards for a preliminary plat and zone change, Valley Vista Estates, as described in the application, should be approved. Motion by: Carstens Seconded by: Williams Vote: Unanimous to approve (3 -0) ATTEST: WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning ector 44A 29 � 4O// // By: Date: 7 No. PS- 1407 -81 Z5 -40 -81 Additional Findings: That the Committee's desire of no piecemeal developments be considered by the present adjacent owner. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE May 5, 1983 Findiny. & Order A. INTRODUCTION C. FINDINGS OF FACT PLANNING CONDITIONS SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER Art Noll i, .No..PS- 1407-81 Valley Vista Estates This matter having come before the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee on May 5, 1983 and the members of the Committee present being Ron McVicker, Chairperson, Ken Kennedy and Lynn Tennican. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Guthrie Investments, Inc., is requesting approval of an Extension of Time for PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES, and Zone Change ZS- 40 -81, Unclassified to R -I for subdivision of 11 acres into 12 lots for single - fancily dwellings, and there being present, the following applicant or representative: 1. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with... 2. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 3. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapproval of the proposed Extension of Time. 4. That the information in the STAFF REPORT was considered. 5. That substantial progress has been made toward finalization of this preliminary plat and will be finalized Summer of 1983. 6. That this proposal does constitute "fill -in" development for the SUBURBAN category, for the Priority Sewer Service Area, and for existing public services and facilities in the vicinity. D. SPECIAL EXPLANATION OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS DECISION Those conditions as listed in the May 5, 1983 STAFF REPORT, as amended below. 2. That the preliminary plat he given one (1) additional year conditional approval to June 1, 1984. May 5, 1983 _ No. PS- 1407 -81 Findings & Order Valley Vista Estates E. ORDER ATTEST: By: Date: The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of PS 1407 -81, Valley Vista Estates, and Zone Change ZS- 40 -81, Unclassified to R-1 for an Extension of Time is hereby APPROVED to June 1, 1984. Motion by: Ken.Kennedy Seconded by: Lynn Tennican Vote: Unanimous Ron McVicker - Aye Ken Kennedy - Aye Lynn Tennican - Aye JOHN NUNNERY Subdivision Administrator HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY.ATTEST TO THE ABOVE ( FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE. Chairperson t Hearing Examiner Comnitt..- .ctions - May 5, 1983 j. PE- 1306A -79, SUNRISE EAST 1ST AUDITION ZE- 111 -79, Agricultural to'Agricultural and R -I Sponsor: 928 -0600 Gordon Curry 9209 E. Trent Spokane, WA 99206 Location: The proposal is located in the Otis Orchards area south and adjacent Wellesley Ave. and east and adjacent Lynden Ave.; within Section 3, Township 25N, Range 45 EWM., Spokane County, Washington Comprehensive Plan: URBAN Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 6 acres into 7 lots for single- family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 6 acres from Agricultural to Agricultural and R -l. Action: Unanimous approval for only one additional year. 6. PN 1355 -79, PEONE PRAIRIE ESTATES 3RD ADDITION ZN 249 - 79, Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban and R -I Sponsor: 466 -6271 466 -3184 J.E. Upham 6 E.M:' Jones ' " "" Rt. 3 Box 9 Rt. 3 Box 10 Mead, WA 99021 Mead, WA 99021 Location: The proposal is located in the Mead area adjacent and between Farwell and Peone Roads and 1/4 mile west of Fairview Road; within Section 11, Township 26N, Range 43 EWM., Spokane County, Washington Comprehensive Plan: SUBURBAN Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 63 acres into 62 lots for single - family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 63 acres from Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban and R -1. Action: Unanimous approval for only one additional year. 7. PE- 1371 -80, MONACO ADDITION ZE- 63-80, Agricultural to Commercial Sponsor: 926 -6277 Eugene Monaco E. 14820 Sprague Ave. Spokane, WA 99216 Location: The proposal is located in the Spokane Valley south and adjacent Sprague Ave. and between Adams and Progress Roads, within Section 23, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM., Spokane County, Washington Comprehensive Plan: COMMERCIAL Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 2.29 acres into 2 lots for commercial use and to change the zoning on the 2.29 acres from Agricultural to Commercial. Action: _Unanimous approval fos_Lvears_. - 3 - Surveyor /Enqineer: 926 -1322 Richard L. Simpson N. 909 Argonne Rd. Spokane, WA 99206 Surveyor /Engineer:. 534 -5272 -` Mike Senski ..S. 104 Spokane, WA 99262 Surveyor /Enqineer: 535-1410 Patrick J. Moore S. 25 Altamont Spokane, WA 99202 Hearing 'Examiner Cornit Actions - May 5, 1983 8. PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES ZS- 40 -81, Unclassified to R -1 Sponsor: 926 -1561 Guthrie Investments, I E. 9211 Trent Spokane, WA 99206 Sponsor: 456 -8819 Harold Lundy S. 1115 Cedar Spokane, WA 99204 Surveyor /Enqineer: 926 - 5959 nc.. Gene Wrlborn E. 7011 2nd Spokane, WA 99206 Location: The proposal is located in the Ponderosa area and 1/4 mile west of the Dishman -Mica Rd. and Mohawk Drive intersection ; within Section 4, Township 24, Range 44 EWM., Spokane County, Washington Comprehensive Plan: SUBURBAN Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 11 acres into 12 lots for single- family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 11 acres from Unclassified to R -1. Action: Unanimous approval for only one additional year. 9. PE- 1409 -81, MONTE DEL REY 1ST ADDITION ZE- 66 -81, Agricultural to Agricultural, R -1 and Multiple Family Suburban Surveyor /Engineer: 327 -7793 Gerald Masgai N. 2919 Monroe Spokane, WA 99205 south - facing slopes of the and Barker Road inter- Location: The proposal is located on the Spokane Valley lying north of the Trent section; within Section 31 8 32, Township 26N, Range 45 Comprehensive Plan: URBAN Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 72 acres into 103 lots for single-family dwellings and multiple family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 72 acres from Agricultural to Agricultural, R -1 and Multiple Family Suburban, as approved. Action: Unanimous approval for onl one additional year. - 4 EWM., Spokane County, WA TO: FROM: RE: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF EXTENSION OF TIME for PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES ZS- 40 -81, Unclassified to R -1 I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Sponsor: 926 -1561 Surveyor /Engineer: 926 - 5959 Guthrie Investments, Inc. Gene Welborn E. 9211 Trent E. 7011 2nd Spokane, WA 99206 Spokane, WA 99206 B. Location: The proposal is located in the Ponderosa area and 1/4 mile west of the Dishman -Mica Rd. and Mohawk Drive intersection; within Section 4, Township 24N, Range 44 EWM., Spokane County, Washington C. Comprehensive Plan: SUBURBAN D. History: The proposal was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee May 1981 under the provisions of State law for the three -year time extensions. The sponsor indicates the substantial progress has been made; as, part of "the surveying is complete, the water plan is finished and approved, the road and drainage plans are being redesigned and working with County Engineer's Department. The sponsor is planning to finalize this preliminary plat this summer. E. Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 11 acres into 12 lots for single- family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 11 acres from Unclassified to R -1. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION STAFF REPORT May 5, 1983 The Planning Department had recommended that this preliminary plat approval be brought into conformance with the then new RCW 58.17 regarding the amount of time allowed before a preliminary plat must be finalized. State law allowed a preliminary plat three (3) years (without any new conditions) and allows one extension of time for one year, if the sponsor requests the additional year; however, this 4th year may have new conditions added. Three years have passed and the sponsor having made progress is now asking for the additional year extension of approval. No other additional conditions of approval are being recommended by the remaining departments. 31 STAFF REPORT, 5, 198 - III. CONDITIONS PS- 1407 -81 If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. PLANNING CONDITIONS 1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record. 2. That the preliminary plat be given one (1) additional year conditional approval to June 1, 1984. That - - . - .amwndad-) —this preliminary plat approval will become NULL E VOID after the above expiration date and a new application and hearing will be required. 12 30 5) Warranty -- Not applicable. See attached sheet. For each Unit and /or lot connected to the Subdivision Stormwater System Single Family Residence AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this firth day of. May _ , 1985, by and between Guthrie Investments. a- Washington Corporation hereinafter referred to as the "Developer ", and Spokane County, a political subdivi— sion of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "County ", to wit: WHEREAS, the Developer is the owner of a certain tract of land platted into lots, blocks, and streets, known as Valley Vista Estates , hereinafter referred to as the '_Subdivision" and being more particularly described.as follows: WHEREAS, a system of stormwater collection and disposal is to be installed in order that storm sewers shall be available to the residents of the Subdivision as they occupy the houses' therein, and WHEREAS, the single system of stormwater collection and disposal to be installed will jointly and collectively serve the plat known as Valley Vista Estates and: WHEREAS, the Developer is in need of a governmental agency to assume responsibility for the continuous and satisfactory operation and maintenance of the stormwater system, and WHEREAS, the County is williri assume the responsibility of operation and maintenance of the stormwater system on the terms and conditions hereafter set forth, NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises and covenants hereafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1) Construction -- The County shall construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together will all appurtenant facilities. Such construction shall be included in . a RID formed for such purpose pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW. The design shall conform to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. There shall be no cost to the County for the deign or construction of the Subdivision Stormwater System. All costs associated with the design and construction shall be included in the RID and allocated to properties within the boundaries of the RID as provided for in County ordinances concerning road improvement district assessments. 2) Right of Inspection -- Not applicable. 3) Certification -- Not applicable. 4) Easements -- The Developer shall furnish the County with perpetual easements and /or deeds for all protions of the Subdivision Stormwater System lying outside dedicated public rights of way. 6) Additions -- No additional service areas outside the Subdivision shall be connected during the life of this agreement to the Subdivision Stormwater System without the expressed written approval of the County! 7) Acceptance - -The developer shall advise all person, firms or corporations employed by him to sell lots within the Subdivision of the necessity of the County's acceptance of the Subdivision Stormwater System for operation and maintenance prior to the establishment of the road and occupancy of any dwelling units and /or lots on the property serviced by the Subdivision Stormwater System. Acceptance by the County shall be formal acceptance by the Spokane County Engineer of the construction of the Subdivision Stormwater System referred to herein. 8) Operation and Maintenance -- The County shall provide the personnel, vehicles, 'additional equipment other than provided for above, and materials necessary to perate and maintain the Subdivision Stormwater System and shall:5keep an accurate record of the costs thereof. Such records shall be open to the inspection of the Developer: 9) Fees -- The County shall be responsible for the collection of fees in accordance with the following schedule: The monthly charge of $ per Unit' Monthly service charges shall be applicable for each Unit and /or lot beginning the month following the date of acceptance of the part of the System serving the units as provided above (1 w yn paragraph 7 and for each month thereafter. Developer's liability for the monthly charges with respect to any given unit and /or lot will be terminated with the sale of said unit and /or lot. That liability shall thence be the sole responsibility of the lot purchaser. However, the County may, at its option, bill on a yearly basis. Such schedule of charges shall remain in force and effect until such time as a revised schedule of charges is approved by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners after public notice of the intention to revise charges and public hearing thereon. Effective date of revised charges shall be as provided by such resolution but no less than thirty days after the adoption of such resolution. The Developer shall be responsible for insuring that all initial occupants of any dwelling unit built on lots within the Subdivision are aware of the provisions within this paragraph concerning fees and also the provisions within paragraph 7 concerning the necessity of the County's acceptance of the System prior to occupancy. 10) Excess or Deficit,Costs -- To the extent that the monthly charges received from units servied by the System exceed the operation and maintenance cost of the System, it is understood and agreed by the parties that said excess monies shall be rebated to each unit. If the monthly charges are not sufficient to cover the operation and maintenance costs of the system, the schedule of charges shall be increased as stated in paragraph 9. 11) Survival of Covenants and Binding Effect -- All of the promises, covenants, terms and conditions of this agreement shall survive the conveyance hereunder, and this agreement shall extend to and bind the successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. The terms cf this agreement shall be included in the sales agreements conveying any partcof the plat Valley Vi sta Estates 12) Term -- This agreement shall remain in full force and effect until the date of Conveyance as provided in paragraph 15 herein: .13) Security -- Not applicable. 14) Tax -- The Developer shall be responsible for paying any and all real, personal, and other taxes as come due and are owing on the Subdivision Stormwater System or real property housing the same until the Subdivision Stormwater system is conveyed as provided for in paragraph 15 herein. In the event that any taxes are not paid when they come due and are owing, the County shall have the right to immediately terminate any of its obligations under this agreement to operate or maintain the Subdivision Stormwater System upon 30 days notice to the Developer, :during which time the Developer may cure said breach, and the County •es reserves the right to pursue any other legal remedies available for the Developer's breach of this provision. 15) Conveyance and Reversion -- The County is in the process of developing and Comprehensive Stormwater Management Program and Plan. It is possible that part or all of this subdivisicn Stormwater System may be incorporated into this Plan. At such time as partcor all of the Subdivision Stormwater System is proposed to be incorporated, the County will give the Developer 30 days notice of such action. The Developer shall convey such portions of the Subdivision Stormwater System and all rights and appurtenances thereto as necessary. Conveyance shall be at no cost to the County: and shall be accomplished by a Bill of Sale for all real and personal property involved. Those facilities, if any as determined by the County Engineer,ino longer necessary for the Subdivision Stormwater System shall be reconveyed and returned to the Grantor. 16) Comprehensive Stormwater Management Program -- The Developer or successor(s) in interest agree to join in any Comprehensive Stormwater Management Program and to pay such rates and charges in addition to or in lieu of those stated in paragraph 9 above as may be fixed through public hearings for service or benefit obtained by the planning, establish— ment or maintenance of stormwater control facilities in addition to or in lieu of the subdivision Stormwater System. 17) In the event an action is brought invoty ng a breach of warranty or other action involving this agreement, it is agreed that the venue of such action shall be in Spokane County, and it further is agreed that the prevailing party shall be entitled to attorney's fees as adjudged by the Court to be reasonable. 18) Developer's optiontto meet obligation to design and construct by RIO -- The parties agree that the Developer may meet his obligation to design and construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together with all appurtenant facilities as described in paragraph 1 herein by inclusion of such improvements within the improvements of a road improvement district (RID) formed pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW. In the event that the developer opts to meet his obligation to'design and construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together with all appurtenant facilities by inclusion of the same within the improvements of a RID formed for road improvements and stormwater i • improvements, the parties agree that paragraphs 2,3,5,7, and 13 of this agreement shall be null and void. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE CLERK OF THE BOARD DEPUTY APPROVED AS TO FORM: Deputy Prosecuting Attorney STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE )! On this Z 0 day of appeared l rl 1 � above written. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 1985. Title SPOKANE COUNTY BY 2 0 President. Guthrie Investments Inc. Chairman, Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington , 1985, before personally // of 11t� c\- .C 7 (Vv.( who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said A r S for the uses and purposes herein.mentioned, and an oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of the (7( SI , of_ v :CLn A. w✓9, ° ^./r GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL the day and year in this certificate first day of 1 ary Public In and for the • of Washington, resiutng at Spokane, Washington. 7 A- c ADDENDUM TO MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Legal Description of Valley Vista Estates: A portion of Land in Government Lot 9,: in Section 4, T24N, R44E, W.M. , Spokane County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 9; thence N00 ° 40 1 12 "W along the West line of said Section 4, a distance of 433.08 feet to the True Point of beginning for this description. Thence continuing N00 40'12 "W a distance 217.91 feet to a point of a Non - Tangent curve having a Radial Bearing 54 ° 10'39 "E: thence along a curve to the right (having a delta 8 ° 28'03" and a radius of 440.00 feet) 65.03 feet; thence 585 ° 42'36 "E - 54 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta of 50 ° 09'44" and a radius 380.00 feet) 332.69 feet: thence N44 07 "E a distance 365.66 feet to a point of a curve; thence along a curve to the left (having a delta 26 ° 02'31" and a radius 380.00 feet) 172.72 feet; thence N18 ° 05'09 "E - 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a delta 1 14 ° 45'45" and a radius 440.00 feet) 113.37 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve. Said poiht having a Radial Bearing S57 ° 09'06 "E; thence N89 ° 12'57 "E - 73.72 feet; thence 535 ° 14'39 "W - 24.97 feet to a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta 17 ° 09'30" and a radius 380.00 feet) 113.80 feet: thence S18 ° 05'09 "W - 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a delta of 19 ° 30'0J" and a radius 440.00 feet) 149.75 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve having a Radial Bearing N52 ° 24'51 "W; thence S45 ° 52'20 "E - 199.86 feet; thence 544 ° 07'40 "W - 356.00 feet, thence S47 ° 09'45 "W a distance 165.22 feet; thence 562 ° 25'24 "W a distance 139.16 feet; thence S23 ° 46'32 "E - 287.22 feet; thence S01 ° 21'03 "W - 50.00 feet; thence N88 ° 38'57 "W - 224.77 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a delta 36 ° 33'16" and a radius 355.00 feet) 226.49 feet; thence N52 ° 05'41 "W - 149.10 feet: thence S37 ° 54'1.9 "W 170.00 feet; thence N52 ° 05'41 "W - 149.09 feet; thence N48 ° 15'43 "W - 308.08 feet to the point of beginning. r if To: Gary Nelson, Spokane County Engineering Department From: James P. Emacio, Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Re: Proposed changes to standard stormwater agreement Date: April 1, 1985 You have advised that Art Noll is desirous of meeting his obligation to design and construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together with all appurtenant facilities by including the same within an RID formed for the roads in the subdivision. You have further provided me with a proposed agreement which Mr. Noll has drafted for review. It is the recommendation of the Prosecuting Attorney's office that instead of using the form as provided by Mr. Noll the standard form be used and that an additional paragraph be added to that form with provides materially as follows: 18. Developer's option to meet obligation to design and construct by RID. - -The parties agree that the Developer may meet his obligation to design and construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together with all appurtenant • facilities as described .in paragraph 1 herein by inclusion of such improvements within the improvements of a road improvement district (RID) formed pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW. In the event that the developer opts to meet his obligation to design and construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility , together with all appurtenant facilities by inclusion of the same within the improvements of a RID formed for road improvements and stormwater improvements, the parties agree that Paragraphs 2, 3, 5, 7, and 1$'of this agreement shall be null and void. Provided further that if the RID option is selected by the Developer paragraph 1 shall be modified as follows: 1. Construction - -The County shall construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together will all appurtenant facilities. Such construction shall be included in a RID formed for such purpose pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW. The design shall conform to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. There shall be no cost to the County for the design or construction of the Subdivision Stormwater System. All costs associated with the design and construction shall be included in the RID and allocated to properties within the boundaries of the RID as provided for in County ordinances concerning road improvement district assessments. Provided further that paragraph 7 shall be modified as follows: 7. Acceptance - -The developer shall advise all persons, firms or corporations employed by him to sell lots within the Subdivision of the necessity of the County's acceptance of the Subdivision Stormwater System for operation and maintenance prior to the establishment of the road and occupancy of any dwelling units and /or lots on the property serviced by the Subdivision, r z‘i.4 ^4 attifft : Stormwater System. Acceptance by acceptance by the SpOSIOnntili the Subdivision StopOletean - 4 . Inter-office Communication To Ve-tri I S ART N From 1■./ ,C Subject V l zy 1TA r< :FATE 5 DRiebNek:tz AtatErmEti WI Form 327-C R 4 7 a , ;Tty a OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Data A 'TM (NED / 5 1 vv. r keb ck.c-1 to a A5,,,,e h - jm AeRT N 4) L L__ ' 5 j, Di6.; r.-6-Cre_ ( ,, hie J , (I t3 ca v._ . 4- ' t+ -i-c) 7 cfh e r Riv■,o Cow, Co/ re_ (..t. To: Gary Nelson, Spokane County Engineering Department From: James P. Emacio, Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney . Re: Proposed changes to standard stormwater agreement Date: April 1, 1985 You have advised that Art Noll is desirous of meeting his obligation to design and construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together with all appurtenant facilities by including the same within an RID formed for the roads in the subdivision. You have further provided me with a proposed agreement which Mr. Noll has drafted for review. It is the recommendation of the Prosecuting Attorney's office that instead of using the form as provided by Mr. Noll the standard form be used and that an additional paragraph be added to that form with provides materially as follows: 18. Developer's option to meet obligation to design and construct by RID. - -The parties agree that the Developer may meet his obligation to design and construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together with all appurtenant facilities as described in paragraph 1 herein by inclusion of such improvements within the improvements. of a road improvement district (RID) formed pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW. In the event that the developer opts to meet his obligation to design and construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility , together with all appurtenant facilities by inclusion of the same within the improvements of a RID formed for road improvements and stormwater improvements, the parties agree that Paragraphs 2, 3, 5, 7, and 13 of this agreement shall be null and void. Provided further that paragraph 1 shall be modified as follows: 1. Construction - -The County shall construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together will all appurtenant facilities. Such construction shall be included in a RID formed for such purpose pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW. The design shall conform to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. There shall be no cost to the County for the design or construction of the Subdivision Stormwater System. All costs associated with the design and construction shall be included in the RID and allocated to properties within the boundaries of the RID as provided for in County ordinances concerning road improvement district assessments. Provided further that paragraph 7 shall be modified as follows: 7. Acceptance - -The developer shall advise all persons, firms or corporations employed by him to sell lots within the Subdivision of the necessity of the County's acceptance of the Subdivision Stormwater System for operation and maintenance prior to the establishment of the road and occupancy of any dwelling 1 units and /or lots on the property serviced by the Subdisision Stormwater System. Acceptance by the County shall be formal acceptance by the Spokane County Engineer of the construction of the Subdivision Stormwater System referred to herein. 2 To: Gary Nelson, Spokane County Engineering Department From: James P. Emacio, Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Re: Proposed changes to standard stormwater agreement Date: April 1, 1985 You have advised that Art Noll is desirous of meeting his obligation to design and construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together with all appurtenant facilities by including the same within an RID formed for the roads in the subdivision. You have further provided me with a proposed agreement which Mr. Noll has drafted for review. It is the recommendation of the Prosecuting Attorney's office that instead of using the form as provided by Mr. Noll the standard form be used and that an additional paragraph be added to that form with provides materially as follows: 18. Developer's option to meet obligation to design and construct by RID. - -The parties agree that the Developer may meet his obligation to design and construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together with all appurtenant facilities as described in paragraph 1 herein by inclusion of such improvements within the improvements of a road improvement district (RID) formed pursuant —to Chapter 36.88 RCW. In the event that the developer opts to meet his obligation to design and construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility , together with all appurtenant facilities by inclusion of the same within the improvements of a RID formed for road improvements and stormwater improvements, the parties agree that Paragraphs 2, 3, 5, 7, and 13 of this agreement shall be null and void. Provided further that paragraph 1 shall be modified as follows: 1. Construction - -The County shall construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together will all appurtenant facilities. Such construction shall be included in a RID formed for such purpose pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW. The design shall conform to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. There shall be no cost to the County for the design or construction of the Subdivision Stormwater System. All costs associated with the design and construction shall be included in the RID and allocated to properties within the boundaries of the RID as provided for in County ordinances concerning road improvement district assessments. Provided further that paragraph 7 shall be modified as follows: 7. Acceptance- -The developer shall advise all persons, firms or corporations employed by him to sell lots within the Subdivision of the necessity of the County's acceptance of the Subdivision Stormwater System for operation and maintenance prior to the establishment of the road and occupancy of any dwelling units and /or lots on the property serviced by the Subdisision Stormwater. System. Acceptance by the County shall be formal acceptance by the Spokane County Engineer of the construction of the Subdivision Stormwater System referred to herein. 2 /R ° ; r \ Ofils THIS AGREEMENT made this AGREEMENT and between Guthrie investments, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the Developer, and Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the County, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer is the owner of a certain tract of real property platted into lots, blocks and streets, known as , hereinafter referred to as the Subdivision, and being more particularly described as follows: WHEREAS an extensive system of storm sewage collection and disposal is to be installed in order that storm sewer service shall be available to the residence of the Subdivision as they occupy their houses therein, and WHEREAS the system of storm sewage collection and disposal to he installed will jointly and collectively serve the plat known as , and WHEREAS the Developer is in need of a governmental agency to assume responsibility for the construction and for the continuous and satisfactory operation and maintenance of the storm sewage system, and WHEREAS the County is willing to assume the responsibility for the construction, operation and maintenance of the storm sewage system on the terms and conditions hereafter set forth, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1) LAND AND EASEMENTS: The Developer agrees with the 1 County to grant, convey and transfer to the County sufficient land for the maintenance of a holding or drainage pond and allied structures together with such perpetual easements as may be necessary for the construction and maintenance of all portions of 1 day of , 1984, by the subdivision storm sewer system lying outside of dedicated public rights of way. 2) RID: The County and Developer agree that they shall cooperate in forming a Rural Improvement District or Local Improvement District (RID /LID) for the purpose of financing the costs of construction of a storm sewage collection system and disposal facility, the amounts thereof to attach as a lien against each of the individual building lots within the Subdivision. 3) CONSTRUCTION: The County agrees that following organization of the RID or LID, the County shall let a contract for the construction of the storm sewage collection system and disposal facility according to plans and specifications approved by the County Engineers Office, which design shall conform to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. Developer agrees that the Developer shall not interfere with or obstruct the construction of the storm sewer system and disposal facility. 4) REVERSION: At such time as the Subdivision storm sewer system may be intercepted and connected to a general storm sewer system, the interim facilities provided for herein not incorporated in the general storm sewer system together with the easements on which such facilities are situate shall be reconveyed and returned to the then owners of the lots in the Subdivision. The land originally granted to the County for the holding pond shall not revert to the Developer or adjoining land owners, but shall remain the exclusive property of the County to be managed and maintained as a County Park at the discretion of the County. 5) ADDITIONS: No additional service areas outside the Subdivision shall be connected during the life of this agreement to the Subdivision storm sewer system without the express written approval of the County. 6) OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE: The County shall provide the personnel, vehicles, additional equipment, and materials 2 necessary to operate and maintain the Subdivision storm sewer system and shall keep an accurate record of the costs thereof. 7) FEES: The County shall be responsible for the collection of fees at the rate of $ per month from each single family residence connected to the Subdivision sewer system. Monthly service charges shall be applicable for each residential unit commencing the month following the date of completion of construction and for each month thereafter. However, the County may, at its option, bill the individual J. residence on a quarterly, semi - annual or annual basis. Such schedule of charges shall remain in full force and effect until ' such time as a revised schedule of charges is approved by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners after public notice of the intention to revise charges and public hearings thereon. The effective - date_of�- evised charges shall be as provided by such resolution but no less than thirty (30) days after the adoption of such resolution. A copy of this agreement shall be, recorded in the County Auditor's Office to give record notice of these provisions for continuing fees. 8) SURVIVAL OF COVENANTS AND BINDING EFFECT: All of the promises, covenants, terms and conditions of this agreement shall survive the conveyance hereunder, and this agreement, shall extend to and bind the successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. EXECUTED by the parties hereto as of the day and year first above Appearing. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE DEVELOPER CLERK OF THE BOARD By Deputy Approved as to form: Deputy Prosecuting Attorney 3 By BY i Title SPOKANE COUNTY Chairman, Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Spokane County Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee on July 19, 1984 and the members of the Committee present being Jerry Williams, Chairperson, Kathy Carstens and Ron McVicers. B. PROPOSAL C. FINDINGS OF FACT SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER ART NOLL The sponsor, Guthrie Investments, is requesting an "Extension of Time" of preliminary plat of PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES, and Zone Change ZS- 40 -81, Unclassified to R -1 and there being present, the following applicant or representative: 1. That the proposal and information presented in the STAFF REPORT was considered. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as SUBURBAN at "Urban Transition ". 3. That the proposal is within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundary. 4. That the proposal does comply with the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan decision guidelines for "fill -in" development and compatible land uses. 5. That substantial progress toward finalizing the final plat has been made. 6. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapproval of this proposed use. 7. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 8. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 9. That the Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposal as conditioned is not detrimental to the general purpose or otherwise harmful to the public health, safety, and welfare. HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER FILE: PS- 1407 -81 D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS DECISION Those conditions as listed in the July 19, 1984 STAFF REPORT. E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application for Time Extension for Preliminary Plat PS- 1407 -81, Valley Vista Estates, and Zone Change ZS- 40 -81, from Unclassified to R -1, is hereby APPROVED to August 1, 1985. Motion by: Ron McVickers Seconded by: Kathy Carsons Jerry Williams - Aye Kathy Carsons - Aye Ron McVickers - Aye ATTEST: JOHN NUNNERY Spokane County Subdivision Administrator HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER AND VOTE. v 5 9r J!ca ll e Services r Welborn Land Surveying E. 7011 2nd Avenue re: Valley Vista Estates 1 L J The following matters affect the property covered by this order: 1st suppl Dated as of Dds um No. W -AK -735 Rev. 12.73 April 26, 1984 Transamerica . Title Insurance Company SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT / y7 YOUR LOAN NO MORTGAGOR PURCHASER OUR ORDER NO JS- 118603 -M ❑ Deed dated and recorded as file No ❑ Contract dated and recorded as file No ❑ Mortgage dated and recorded as file No ❑ Deed of Trust dated and recorded as file No ❑ Paragraph (s) No of our preliminary commitment is eliminated. ❑ The policy is being issued in accordance with your instructions. ❑ Our inspection of the premises on discloses• x We amend the Legal Description to read as hereinafter attached. ❑ Except as to the matters reported hereinabove, the title to the property covered by this order has NOT been reexamined. IN There has been no change in the title to the property covered by this order since 3/6/84 EXCEPT the matters noted hereinabove. (date of last report) at 8:00 A.M. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE CO. By Order No. JS- 118603 -M Page 2 1st suppl SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Government lot 9; thence N00 °40'12 "W along the West line of said Section 4, a distance of 433.08 feet to the True Point of beginning for this description. Thence continuing N00 ° 40'12 "W a distance 217.91 feet to a point of a Non - Tangent curve having a Radial Bearing S4 °10'39 "E; thence along a curve to the right (having a delta 8 °28'03" and a radius of 440.00 feet) 65.03 feet; thence S85 °42'36 "E - 545.76 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta of 50 °09'44" and a radius 380.00 feet) 332. feet; thence N44 °07'40 "E a distance 365.66 feet to a point of a curve; thence along a curve to the left (having a delta 26 ° 02'31" and a radius 380.00 feet) 172.72 feet; thence N18 °05'09 "E - 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a delta 14 ° 45'45" and a radius 440.00 feet) 113.37 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve. Said point having a Radial Bearing S57 ° 09'06 "E; thence N89 ° 12'57 "E - 73.72 feet; thence S35 ° 1 4 '39 "W - 24.97 feet to a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta 17 °09'30" and a radius 380.00 feet) 113.80 feet; thence S18 °05'09 "W - 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a delta of 19 °30'00" and a radius 440.00 feet) 149.75 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve having a R ._. Bearing N52 °24'51 "W; thence S45 ° 52'20 "E - 199.86 feet; thence S44 °07'40 - 356.00 feet; thence S ° 09'45 "W a distance 165. e- , ence S62 ° 25'24W a distance 139.16 feet; thence S23 °46'32 "E - 287.22 feet; thence S01 °21'03 "W - 50.00 feet; thence N88 °38 57 "W - 224.77 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a delta 3 ° 33'16" and a radius 355.00 feet) 226.49 feet; thence N52 ° 05'41 "W - 149.10 feet; thence S37 ° 54'19 "W - 170.00 feet; thence N52 °05'41 "W - 149.09 feet; thence N48 °15'43 "W - 308.08 feet to the point of beginning. Dear Sir: Transamerica - Title Services Welborn Land Surveying E 7011 2nd Avenue Spokane., WA PLAT CERTIFICATE (continued) Transamerica Title Insurance Compar. rJorth 720 Argonne Road " Spokane, Washington 99212 (509) 922-2222 Order No. JS- 118603 -M Certificate for filing plat of VALLEY VISTA ESTATES In the matter of the plat to be submitted to Spokane County for approval, this Company has examined the records of the Spokane County Auditors and Clerks offices, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Dis- trict Court holding terms in said County, and from such examination here- by certifies the title to the following described land, to wit: A portion of land in Government Lot 9 of Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 E.W.M., more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 9; thence North 00 ° 40'12" West along the West line of said Section 4, a dis- tance of 433.08 feet to the True Point of Beginning for this de- scription; thence continuing North 00 °40'12" West a distance of 217.91 feet to a point of a non - tangent curve having a radial bear- ing South 04 ° 10'39" East; thence along a curve to the right (having a delta 8 °28'03" and a radius of 440.00 feet) 65.03 feet; thence South 85 ° 42'36" East 545.76 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta of 50 °09'44" and a ra- dius 380.00 feet) 332.69 feet; thence North 44 °07'40" East a dis- tance of 365.66 feet to a point of a curve; thence along a curve to the left (having a delta 26 ° 02'31" and a radius 380.00 feet) 172.72 feet; thence North 18 ° 05'09" East 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a delta 14 °45'45" and a radius 440.00 feet) 113.37 feet to a non - tangent point on the curve, said point having a radial bearing South 57 °09'06" East; thence North 89 °12'57" East 73.72 feet; thence South 35 ° 14'39" West 24.97 feet to a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta 17 °09'30" and a radius 380.00 feet) 113.80 feet; thence South 18 °05'09" West 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a delta 19 °30'00" and a radius 440.00 feet) 149.75 feet to a non - tangent point on the curve having a radial bearing North 52 °24'51" West; thence South 45 ° 52'20" East 199.86 feet; thence South 44 °07'40" East 356.00 feet; thence South 47 ° 09'45" West 165.22 feet; thence South 62 ° 25'24" West 139.16 feet; VESTED IN: EXCEPTIONS: Order No. J _18603 -M. Page 2 thence South 23 °46'32" East 287.32'feet; thence South 01 °21'03" West 50.00 feet; thence North 88 °38'57" West 224.77 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a delta 36 ° 33'16" and a radius 355.00 feet) 226.49 feet; thence North 52 °05'41" West a distance of 149.10 feet; thence South 37° 54'19" West 170.00 feet; thence North 52 °05'41" West 149.09 feet; thence North 48 °15'43" West 308.08 feet to the point of beginning; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. (RALPH D. GUTHRIE and GERT UDE 0. GUTHRIE, husband and wife. 1. General taxes as follows, together with interest and penalty, if any, after delinquency: Tax Account No. Year Annual Billing Amount Paid Balance Due 04442 -9083 1981 $173.20 0.00 $173.20 II 1982 $380.70 0.00 $380.70 1983 $371.98 0.00 $371.98 1984 $375.00 0.00 $375.00 WATER SYSTEM AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Between: The Washington Water Power Company, a corporation And: Guthrie Investments Incorporated Purpose: Provide rights of way for water and electric facilities Dated: May 31, 1973 Recording No.: 224577C 3, MORTGAGE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Mortgagor: Ralph D. Guthrie and Gertrude 0. Guthrie, husband and wife, and Valley Vista Conva- lescent Center, a corporation Mortgagee: Commerce Mortgage Company, a corporation Amount: $287,500.00 Dated: March 23, 1977 Recorded: March 30, 1977 Recording No.: 7703300276 Affects: This and other property (continued) 4. MORTGAGE AND THE Mortgagor: • Mortgagee: Amount: Dated: Recorded: Recording No.: Records examined to March 6, 1984 at 8:00 A.M. kent November 15, 1983 8311150048 By: Order No. J. ,.18603 -M. Page 3 TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Ralph D. Guthrie and Gertrude 0. Guthrie, husband, and wife C9mm re ce Mortgage Company $75,000.00 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY loTT 8 SA 1 0C I 4 No. S . . /078 804c. /2808 or rvi ft /20 8 1ANSAMEROA - 1+ , 1! E H2.URArcE COMPANY NORTI- 7 ARGONNE ROAD SPCYNANE, WA, 9920e 1 E a 3 pc-rx is mei.? ta- the purrs:, el assathi L1-7, :h!CD:Tcar-7 nttnett • fe,7 : 1 t^y. di.--ern rid Thcc:ir ;:nry. /20()6 ••■• C. -11 in ri EsrAn NO.7 x 1 , 2 5ob /256S-5 +-- Z0770" ! 'r X2 , I 1 : i 2 , .41,9 CUL -DE -SAC EASEMENT A Portion of land in Government Lot 9, Section 4, T24N, R44E, W.M., Spokane County, State of Washington, to be held as road ease- ment for a Temporary Cul -De -Sac by Spokane County untill such time as the road named "Gertude Drive" is extended. Said ease- ment being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the West Quarter Corner of said Section 4; thence North 00 ° 40'12" West a distance 433.08 feet; thence South 48 °15'43" East a. distance 308.08 feet; thence South 52 °05'41" East a distance 149.09 feet; thence North 37 °54'19" East a dis- tance 170.00 feet to the Southerly Right -of -Way line of Gertude Drive thence South 52 °0 East along the Southerly Right -of- Way line of said Gertude Drive 149.10 feet to a point of a curve to the left having a Delta of 36 °33'16" and a Radius 355.00 feet; thence along the said curve to the left 226.49 feet; thence South 88 °38'57" East a distance 224.77 feet to the True Point of Beginning for this description, and a Point of a Curve to the right having a Delta 52 °01'03" and a Radius of 15 feet; thence along said curve 13.62 feet to a Point of Reverse Curve to the left having a Delta of 1 0 02'06" and a Radius of 50.00 feet; thence along said Curve 90.79 feet to a point of a Reverse Curve to the right having a Delta of 52 °01'03" and a Radius of 15.00 feet; thence along said Curve 13.62 feet to a Point; thence South 88 °38'57" East a distance 7.00 feet; thence North 01 °21'03" East a distance 50.00 feet; thence North 88 °38'57" West a distance 7.00 feet to a Point of a Curve to the right having a Delta 52 °01'03" and a Radius of 15.00 feet; thence along said Curve 13.62 feet to a Point of a Reverse Curve to the left having a Delta 104 °02'06" and a Radius of 50.00 feet; thence along said Curve to the left 90.79 feet to a Reverse Curve to the right having a Delta 52 °01'03" and a Radius of 15.00 feet; thence along said Curve to the right 13.62 feet to a Point; thence South 01 ° 21'03" West a distance 50.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. DRAINAGE EASEMENT $ A strip of land 15 feet wide in Government Lot 9, Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M., geing 7.5 feet on each side of the following described Center Line: Beginning at the most Northerly Point of Lot 1 Block 1 of Valley Vista Estates; thence South 45 °52'20" East along the Easterly line of said Lot 1 a distance 67.36 feet to the True Point of Beginning for this description; thence North 12 ° 13'06" West a distance 25.65 feet; thence North 48 °45'09" West a distance 47.59 feet to the Southerly Rights -of -Way line of Ponderosa Drive and there Teiininating this description. Situate in Spokane County, State of Washington AZ/BRG CORR FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH PE140 PLAT PDRY ***** START 1 INV N 52 05 41"0 W 2 INV N 48 15 43.0 W 3 INV N 0 40 12.0 W INV CURVE RADIAL N 4 10 39.0 W DELTA 8 28 03.0 RT RAD 440,0000 TAN 32.5722 L-ARC 65.0257 RADIAL N 4 17 24.0 E RP 4 CHORD S 89 56 37.5 E TAN@PT S 85 42 36.0 E 6 INV S 85 42 36.0 E RADIAL S 4 17 24.0 W DELTA 50 09 44.0 LT RAD 380"0000 TAN 177.8523 LT L-ARC 332.6885 ARC S 45 52 20.0 E RP 7 CHORD N 69 12 32.0 E TAN@PT N 44 07 40.0 E DEFL 0 00 00.0 RT 9 TRAV N 44 07 40.0 E RADIAL S 45 52 20.0 E DELTA 26 02 31"0 LT RAD 380.0000 TAN 87..8764 L-ARC 172,7167 RADIAL S 71 54 51.0 E RP 10 CHORD N 31 06 24.5 E TAN@PT N 18 05 09.0 E DEFL 0 00 00^0 RT 12 TRAV N 18 05 09.0 E RADIAL N 71 54 51.0 W DELTA 14 45 45"0 RT RAD 440.0000 TAN 56.9996 L-ARC 113^3679 RADIAL N 57 09 06.0 W RP 13 CHORD N 25 28 01.5 E TAN@PT N 32 50 54"0 E 15 TRAV N 89 12 57.0 E 16 TRAV S 34 14 39.0 W 149.0900 308.0800 217.9100 64,9666 545.7600 322.1647 365^66O0 171.2338 117.3000 113.0545 73.7200 24.7700 e - � 1000.00000 1091.59462 1296.69152 1514.58662 1075.75563 1514.52284 1473"69744 1852.63275 1588.05362 1850.52028 2115"()7712 1997.13168 2103,63619 1972,04197 2210.70549 2211.71442 2191.07304 EAST 681.98014 714.89420 1259.12509 1287.55087 1560.31062 1814.90537 1542^11562 1903.37078 . 2358.04626 1988"39816 2O62^11125 2048.06011 T O 1000.00000 1 882.36389 2 652.47577 3 649"92766 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 1939.78555 13 14 15 16 17 FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO 2211.71442 2062.11125 16 16 UUKK 6 � 14 6'9.0 W RADIAL N 54 45 21.0 W DELTA 17 09 30.0 LT RAD 380.0000 TAN 57^3 L-ARC 113.7984 RADIAL N 71 54 51^0 W RP 17 CHORD S 26 39 54.0 W TAN@FT S 18 05 09,0 W DEFL 0 00 00"0 RT 19 TRAV 9 18 05 09.0 W RADIAL S 71 54 51.0 E DELTA 19 30 00.0 RT RAD 440.0000 TAN 75.6059 L-ARC 149.7492 RADIAL S 52 24 51.0 E RP 20 CHORD 'S 27 50 09.0 W TAN@PT 8 37 35 09.0 W � 2� TRAV p 45 52 20.0 E 23 TRAV 9 44 07 40.0 W 24 TRAV S 47 09 45.0 W 25 TRAV 9 62 25 24.0 W 26 TRAV S 23 46 32.0 E 27 TRAY 8 1 21 03.0 W DEFL 90 00 00,0 RT 28 TRAV N 88 38 57.0 W RADIALS 1 21 03"0 W DELTA 36 33 16.0 RT RAD 355.0000 TAN 117.2485 L-ARC 226.4884 RADIAL S 37 54 19.0 W 'RP 29 CHORD N 70 22 19.0 W TANIPPT N 52 05 41.0 W DEFL 0 00 00.0 RT 24.V/00 111V1.5,z14l 113.3736 117.3000 149.0276 199.8600 356.0000 165.2200 139.1600 287.2200 50.0000 224.7700 222.6666 1972.03783 2090.00556 1978.50106 1322.64132 1042.53656 31 TRAV N 52 05 41.0 W 149.1000 1134.13732 32 TRAV S 37 54 19.0 W 170.0000 1000.00265 ------------------------------------------------------- LAT & DEP -0.00265 33 HCLOSE S 18 59 54.8 W 0.0028 1000.00000 • PREC=1 TO 1727630 566551~57ft 13.0062ac 20*/./o101 1/ 2358,04813 18 1996.82297 19 1960^40820 20 2115,09528 1542^14749 21 1846"71761 1890,82130 2I 1707.56291 2034"27857 23 1452'03009 1786.40970 24 1339,69348 1665.25635 25 1275,27143 1541.90602 26 1012.42729 1657,70017 27 962.44118 1656.52145 28 967^73999 1431"81392 29 1440,18280 30 1222.08575 31 1104.44175 32 1000.00091 33 -0^00091 1000.00000 1 FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO PONDEROSA RD CL $$*** START 1514.58662 649.72766 4 4 INV 9 0 40 12.0 E 30^0540 1984"53469 650^27907 * 34 RADIAL N 4 26 04.0 W DELTA 8 43 28.0 RT RAD 410.0000 TAN 31"2759 L-ARC 62.4308 RADIAL N 4 17 24.0 E RP 1075.76205 681,97964 35 34 CHORD N 89 55 40.0 E 62.3705 1484.61331 712.64956 36 .TAN@PT S 85 42 36.0 E DEFL 0 00 00.0 RT 36 TRAV S 85 42 36.0 E 50.0300 1480.87083 762.53939 37 DEFL 0 00 00.0 RT 37 TRAV S 85 42 36.0 E 495.7300 1443.78791 1256"88045 38 RADIAL S 4 17 24.0 W DELTA 50 09 44^0 LT RAD 410.0000 TAN 191.8932 L-ARC 358.9533 RADIAL S 45 52 20.0 E RP 1852.63917 1287"55037 39 38 CHORD N 69 12 32.0 E 347"5997 1567.17221 1581.84379 40 TAN@PT N 44 07 40:0 E DEFL 0 00 00.0 RT 40 TRAV N 44 07 40.0 E 365.6600 1329^63887 1836.43854 41 RADIAL 45 52 20"0 E DELTA 26 02 31.0 LT RAD 410^0000 TAN 94.8140 L-ARC 186.3522 RADIAL S 71 54 51.0 E RP 2115.10583 1542"14512 42 41 CHORD N 31 06 24.5 E 184.7523 1787"82486 1931.88805 . 43 TAN@PT N 18 05 09.0 E DEFL 0 00 00"0 RT 43 TRAV N 18 05 07"0 E 117.3000 2079.32936 1968.30 44 RADIAL N 71 54 51^0 W DELTA 17 09 30.0 RT RAD 410.0000 TAN 61.8542 L-ARC 122.7825 RADIAL N 54 45 21.0 W RP 1972,04839 2358.04576 45 44 CHORD N 26 39 54.0 E 122.3242 2203"64382 2023.19864 46 TAN@PT N 35 14 39.0 E DEFL 0 00 0().0 RT 46 TRAV N 35 14 39"0 E 3.1500 2211.21643 2025.01638 47 16*15 47 TRAV S 89 12 57.0 W 36.6250 2210.71519 1998.39481 48 -==:=�����====� LAT & DEP -0.00969 0.00334 48 HCiOSE S 19 01 52.0 E 0"0103 2210"70549 1988.39816 15 FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO GOV'T LOT 9 ***** START 1296.69152 652.47577 3 4*3 3 TRAV S 0 40 12,0 E 433.0800 863.64113 657.53997 90 • 3*4 90 TRAV N 0 40 12.0 W 1328.7300 2192"28028 642.00254 91 15*16 91 TRAV N 89 12 57.0 E 1383"1400 2211.20975 2025.01300 92 92 TRAV S 1 08 56"0 E 1328"0400 883.43673 2051.64094 93 93 TRAV S 89 12 02.0 W 2688.8700 845.92031 -636.96733 94 FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO 2192.28028 642.00254 . 91 AZ/BRG CORR 91 CORR N 89 12 57.0 E 2677.7700 2228.92788 3319.52176 92 901-15486 3346"14969 93 863"63844 657.54142 94 FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO -------------------------, _________________________________ AUTO INV ***** START 1296.69152 652.47577 3 3 INV 8 0 40 12.0 E 433.0800 863.64113 657.53997 90 90 INV N 0 40 12.0 W 1328.7300 2192.28028 642.00254 91 91 INV N 89 12 57.0 E 2677.7700 2228.92738 3319.52176 92 92 INV S 1 08 56.0 E 1328.0400 901.15486 3346.14969 93 93 INV 8 89 12 02.0 W 2688^8700 863.63244 657.54142 94 --- LAT & DEP 0.00269 -0.00146 94 HCLOSE N 28 24 50.2 W • 0.0031 863.64113 657"53997 90 PREC=1 TO 2762899 NO AREA FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO AUTO INV PE1407 B2 SL ***** START 1 INV N 52 05 41.0 W 2 INV N 48 15 43.0 W 3 INV N 0 40 12.0 W INV CURVE RADIAL N 4 43 55.0 W DELTA 9 01 19.0 RT RAD 380.0000 TAN 29.9799 L-ARC 59.8358 RADIAL N 4 17 24.0 E RP 77 CHORD N 89 46 44.5 E TAN@PT S 85 42 36.0 E 89 INV 8 85 42 36.0 E INV CURVE RADIAL N 4 17 24.0 E DELTA 79 49 23.0 RT RAD 20.0000 TAN 16.7294 L-ARC 27.8635 RADIAL N 84 06 47.0 E RP 79 CHORD S 45 47 54.5 E TAN@FT S 5 53 13.0 E INV CURVE RADIAL S 84 06 47^0 W DELTA 63 31 32.0 LT RAD 175.0000 TAN 108.3473 L-ARC 194.0278 RADIAL S 20 35 15.0 W RP 81 CHORD S 37 38 59.0 E TAN@PT S 69 24 45.0 E 83 INV S 69 24 45.0 E INV CURVE RADIAL N 20 35 15.0 E DELTA 17 19 04 RT RAD 275.0000 TAN 41.9790 IS-ARC 83.1194 RADIAL N 37 54 19.0 E RP 84 CHORD S 60 45 13"0 E TAN@PT S 52 05 41.0 E 86 INV S 52 05 41.0 E 87 INV S 37 54 19.0 W 149"090O 308.0800 J57.7800 59.7740 9"2200 25.6642 184"2412 68.3800 82.8033 149.0900 170.0000 1000.00000 1091.59462 1296.69152 1454.46073 1075.75594 1454.69126 1454.00156 ~ 1434.05760 718,10242 80 1436"10892 . 737.99694 81 1454.05795 1270,23410 1266;18913 1008.75166 1225.73422 1000.00000 882.36339 652.47577 650.63078 / / 681.97856 78 710.40434 89 719,59851 79 912,07403 82 850.53748 83 914.55048 84 817"85018 85 986"79860 86 1134.13960 1104,43471 87 1000.00493 999.99307 88 -0.00493 0,00613 LAT & DEP 88 HCLnSE S 51 12 31.5 E 0.0079 1000.00000 1000"00000 PREC=1 TO 175079 76469^91ft 1.7555ac 1 FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO PE1407 GERTRUDE DRIVE ***** START 37 TRAV G 1 02 48.0 W RADIAL N 88 57 12.0 W DELTA 70 27 33.0 LT RAD 150.00(}0 TAN 105.9294 L-ARC 184.4617 RADIAL S 20 35 15.0 W RP 49 CHORD S 34 10 58"5 E TAN@PT 8 69 24 45.0 E DEFL 0 00 00^0 RT 51 TRAV S 69 24 45.0 E RADIAL N 2() 35 15.0 E DELTA 17 19 04.0 RT RAD 300"0000 TAN 45.6862 L-ARC 90.6757 RADIAL N 37 54 19,0 E RP 52 CHORD S 60 45 13.0 E TAN@PT 8 52 05 41,0 E DEFL 0 00 00.0 RT 54 TRAV S 52 05 41.0 E RADIAL S 37 54 19.0 W DELTA 36 33 16.0 LT RAD 330.0000 TAN 108"9915 L-ARC 210.5385 RADIAL S 1 21 03.0 W RP 55 CHORD S 70 22 19.0 E TAN@PT S 88 38 57.0 E DEFL () o0 00.0 RT 57 TRAV S 38 38 57.0 E 28*27 58 TRAV N 1 21 03.0 E ============================= LAT & DEP 59 HCLOSE S 34 52 16.5 E PREC=1 TO 100775 24.0700 173.0562 68.3800 90.3309 298.1900 206.9859 1480.87083 1456.80485 1454.06483 1313.64439 1289.59943 1008.75854 1245.46679 1062.27142 1322.65049 992.74220 912.07468 959.3 2906 923.34206 817.85083 1002.15820 1237.43831 762"53939 37 762.09970 49 50 51 52 54 55 1440.17641 56 1432^39689 57 224.7700 987.44340 1657.10442 58 25.0000 1012.43646 1657.69378 59 ============================================= -0.00917 0.00639 0.0112 1012^42729 1657"70017 27 NO AREA FROM ANGLE PE1407 D1 SL ***** START 22 INV 9 45 52 20.0 E 23 INV S 44 07 40.0 W 24 INV 9 47 09 W 25 INV 9 62 25 24.0 W 26 INV S 23 46 32.0 E 28*29 27 TRAV N 88 38' 57.0 W RADIAL 9 • 1 21 03.0 W DELTA 36 33 16.0 RT RAD 305.0000 TAN 100.7346 L-ARC 194"5886 RADIAL 9 37 54 19.0 W RP 60 CHORD N 7022 19.0 W TAN@PT N 52 05 41.0 W DEFL 0 00 00.0 RT 62 TRAV N 52 05 41,0 W RADIAL N 37 54 19.0 E DELTA 17 19 04.0 LT RAD 325"0000 TAN 49.4934 L-ARC • 98.2720 RADIAL N 20 35 15.9 E RP 63 CHORD N 60 45 13.0 W TAN@PT N 69 24 45.0 W DEFL 0 00 00.0 RT 65 TRAV N 69 24 45.0 W RADIAL S 20 35 15.0 W DELTA 54 32 48.0 RT RAD 125.0000 TAN 64.4437 L-ARC 119.0024 RADIAL 9 75 08 03.0 W RP 66 CHORD N 42 08 21.0 W TAN@PT N 14 51 57.0 W RADIAL S 75 08 03,0 W DELTA 109 09 21.0 RT RAD 20.0000 ' TAN 28.1198 L-ARC 38.1026 RADIAL N 4 17 24"0 E RP 68 CHORD N 39 42 43.5 E TAN@PT 9 85 42 36.0 E DEFL 0 00 00.0 RT 70 TRAV S 85 42 36.0 E RADIAL S 4 17 24.0 W DELTA 50 09 44.0 LT RAD 440^0000 TAN 205:7392 L-ARC 385,2182 RADIAL 9 45 52 20.0 E RP 71 CHORD N 69 12 32.0 E TAH@PT N 44 07 40.0 E DEFL 0 00 00.0 RT 73 TRAV N 44 07 40,0 E RADIAL 9 45 52 20.0 E DELTA 6 32 31.0 LT RAD 440.0000 TAN 25,1466 L-ARC 50.2385 RADIAL S 52 24 51.0 E RP 74 CHORD N 51 24.5 E TAN@PT N 37 35 09.0 E DIST NORTH EAST TO 199.8600 356.0000 165.2200 139"160O 287.2290 224^7700 191.3051 298.2000 97.8585 68.3800 114.5590 32.5962 443.7900 373.0328 365^6600 50^2112 1846.71761 1707.56291 1452"03O09 1339.69348 1275.27143 1012,42729 1017.72609 1322.64132 1081.98794 1265.18946 1003.75552 1312,99981 1337.04478 1454.06181 1421.99225 1427"12338 1447.06734 1413.86777 1852.63698 1546.28220 1808.74836 2115.10364 1846.72598 189O^G2130 2034.27857 1786,4097O 16' 5.25635 1541.90602 1657.70017 22 23 24 25 26 • 27 1432"99264 60 1440"18280 61 1252.80364 62 1017.51564 63 817.84933 64 932.13150' 65 868.11850 66 912.07317 67 791.25702 68 810"58760 69 812.08370 70 1254.63029 71 1287.54435 72 1603.37143 73 1857.96618 74 1542"17910 75 1890"81291 76 LAT & DEP -0.00837 0.00837 76 HCLOSE 9 45 04 06.4 E 0.0118 1846.71761 1890.82130 22 PREC=1 TO 289837 329882.09ft 7.5731ac y E.6079 N ` 1. qa.: N i 5'PUBL I0. UTILITY: • • /EASEMENT. (TYPICAL) , • 133 :45 ••• • .• _ 1.224. .. N. 89° 12' 02"E ;RVE ' PARER 2 ? » 9001 '': • 'ftNa, .Measur8ment:1 'Plat ° t4psuren%ent , ., bur e'9oto1':NuMbe me 15 Drainoge, Easeiile . 1/4 CORNER D ;AXLE °r 0 ;`:Tic: 8": PINE::S. NTNi tO S 6 / •IlLia, p - 17"09 1 :N it • r " ). ' 2 6002 31 375. 176 8 • • 1 - jr2 9 ... 44n. a 1.,,C01:f•-•m;.1 '''''....::.:Ailk:);311,.;;14e:.041ilitesi.cr.L FIA •--- -• - • - ' • •••;11209-';';.•:.....: J Za act ::!' • • 'ARC : CURVE RADIOS , LENGTH NUMBER t:Y Cst itjne.Ps..:1;.: s frit:trie,14' -1‘•-•1•4- ,,, BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 84 0042 IN THE MATTER OF ) ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT N0. 373 ) R e s o l u t i o n IMPROVEMENT OF PONDEROSA DRIVE ) COUNTY ROAD FILE NO. 2581 WHEREAS, Spokane County has completed the improvement of Ponderosa Drive under Road Improvement District No. 373; and WHEREAS, the adjacent landowner had requested and received approval by the Board of County Commissioners for adjustments in the assessment against certain properties in the District which properties are to be designated as public natural areas; and WHEREAS, an agreement has been prepared setting forth the conditions for adjust- ment of assessments and the designation of the natural areas and the County Engineer recommends approval of the agreement by Spokane County. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington that the agreement between Spokane County and Ralph Guthrie con- cerning the adjustment in assessments for RID No. 373 and designation of natural area is hereby approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Wash- ington, this 17th day of January, 1984. ATTEST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE % "CLERK OF THE BOARD BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1 9 84 0042 AGREI:NI:NT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this / 7 , by and between RALPH CIl'1'IIRIE, hereinafter referred to as'the "Grantor" and SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, herein- after referred to as the "Grantee ", jointly referred to as the "Parties ". WTTNESSE'1'Il For and in consideration of the covenants herein contained, the GRANTOR hereby agrees to convey to the GRANTEE the following described property situ- ated in Spokane County, Washington, Lo -wit: Those portions of the following described land Lying Northerly of the proposed road as shown on the map attached hereto and by re- ference made a part hereof. Government Lot 8 in the Northwest Quarter (NWT) of Section 4, Town- ship 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M. EXCEPT that portion lying North and West of Ponderosa Drive and also EXCEPT Short Plat No. 78 -042. Government Lot 9 in the Northwest Quarter (NWT) of Section 4, Town- ship 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M.; EXCEPT that portion lying Easter- ly of the Plat Ponderosa Hills and Northerly of the existing dirt easement road to properties West of the GRANTORS Ownership. The East half (Eli) of Government Lot 10 in the Northeast Quarter (NE') of Section 5, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M.: EXCEPT that portion in the plat of Ponderosa Hills. As consideration for the conveyance, the PARTIES agree as follows: 1. The GRANTOR shall be responsible for all surveying and engineering service necessary to formalize the final conveyance. 2. The GRANTOR shall execute and deliver to the GRANTEE a Warranty Deed conveying fee simple title. 3. The GRANTEE shall not be responsible for any cost associated with the construction of the road that constitutes the Southerly boundary of the dfore- described lands. 4. It is agreed by the PARTIES hereto that the distribution of the assess- ment for Road Improvements on Ponderosa Drive under County Road Improvement Dis- trict No. 373 against Parcel No. 04442 -9078 in the total amount of $12,193.48 shall be shared as follows: $2,376.20 shall be assessed against the said parcel following the normal RID process; $4,908.64 shall be distributed amongst the other properties in the District; $4,9118.64 shall be due and owing Irom the GRANTOR to Spokane County upon the development of the remainder of said Parcel No. 04442 - 9078 due and payable before final approval of any plat or other development of the said parcel. 84 0042 5. The GRANTEE shall have no responsibility to develop the lands being conveyed. It is the desire of the PARTIES to leave the area in its native con- dition; however, Spokane County will, by permit, allow the Grantor to place upon the lands to be conveyed a storm water storage pond and appurtenant facil- ities as approved by the County Engineer. All installation and maintenance cost to be the sole responsibility of the Grantor. 6. The PARTIES agree that the convenants set forth herein shall be final- ized within 12 months of the date of this agreement. This agreement may be extended by mutual consent of the parties. If the agreement is extended, the Grantor shall pay, in addition to the $4,908.64 set forth in paragraph 4, interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum on said sum from the date of this agreement. 7. This agreement shall insure to the benefit of and be binding on the heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the PARTIES. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands the day and year above written. ‹ : ...� r tom RALPH GUTHRIE DATE SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ATTEST: dir 1 rk o the Board STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ss Given under my hand and seal this day of On this day personally appeared before me known to be the individual described herein who executed the within and fore- going instrument and acknowledged that / signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Notary PG6lic in Washington, Residing a Washington. he State of Spokane, TO: CT E N F \Aliz eo FROM: CTARY A ,EL _sari SUBJECT: OFFICE OF COUNTY UTILITIES DEPT. Spokane, Wash. 1'd 67 Standard drainage language for the dedication oS,41 ( F Y �i STf� The owners of Lots _ , , _ , & , of Block and Block _ shall be held responsible for obstructing discharging the natural or manmade drainage flow property. The property owner or his representative shall inform each suceeding purchaser of all drainage easements on the property and his responsibility for maintaining drainage facilities within said easements. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or flood plain areas nor the responsibility for any drainage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. 4. Floors, including basement floors, shall_ not he constructed elow elevation , ti ota datum, within Lots _, , , 6 _ Block _ of this plat as required by the "National Flood Insurance Program 5. An approved lot grading plan exists for Lots _, , & _ Block _ and Lots & Block • Grading must conform to said plan on file in the County Engineer's Office. 6. Spokane County shall not he flood plain area. c-y-Fhit PEA y011� 'RE 4U EJ J T -rr-'S AS SC) ✓v\ S No responsible to maintain ingress or egress across the coot - r1' IA PI TEN A N.CE ON PR \V ATE PRo PERrty t rl I /\! k. THIS QUES - r;oN HAS i ErN W o (.1 u r - rt1 IS � LAr S kA1ALES OP - r H S DC) N` i\ N S \A/ ERE D S o = LAv.I ex Lk A EIE 0 tN Date: ,19 3 Lots , , , & of and arttfically collecting or across or adjacent to their r Avr SEh -s+ -\'s, 1 D Laa \ Llhi I /an.d - � , 4 4 c�, aeLtigto old- Az 6,4 fo C- e-e-Qc iii G?:2 'de , t`if� -fie r n c_ 't/L( AG9. / Go6 . A otimocLecy 007 . 21 - 40-0 41a15- f m 0 c4.1.<eS /0 r - e .c.Q; t .d- - _ - -- g g I g a . 2-{? . - 9 1"2? ce 7- - - 1 1 64-11 /Soo 4 0 X 0 • 5 lc = «o 'X 274g.sagt x 1 • Oe.JpcJ .3a /t 5.#, ' 6 a ( — S r--r--- J-se. I- • • 31. V -fats+ x t 7-- Co7 9625 ? 2 ' s--e 7 \AP x0.0' x 4 .22, 414 °(K .• c/o° Asas, Y eta PA 57- a.7 LK at( 1--g" r c to.0 4r-4 _Curb Ces-t ID /7 wee/3 " C-fl2 C ir caz P _ 8LeA.4,7 (c1, /70 o tec q'siodsrsr z Sit 7.5 02 _ _7 c q 0 _ /2_3O : cy e 60 e .2-Jo -Pe SacD - s tic ( / 3 7C c p AC P 13- cc, ' 3 LE0 0 La--6 - c rev •L' e, Gee /cr-=' O 12 7e ye , e / 52rqsy e 73 00 2-e7 0 C-e= ,,% /2-300.00 Vi 4P9 -. 15- # 9ea ro r Inter-office Communication tr+ : 14444.1 From °'' Subject % OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON — Date Inter-office Communication To (/4 From Subject b.ar, A — Aciew.carAva „aet, 202.- 1 - Form 327 -C.R. OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date 57// , 19JZ L0T8 80 Ac . A 0.80. A1 LOT7 8OA [O h4 .9 8 1 - -- ' NOER O N/2Z as vie • Dear Sir: Transamerica Title Services Guthrie Investments E 9211 Trent Spokane, WA CERTIFICATE TO. PLAT cc. Spokane County Engineer cc. Spokane County Planning Commission In the matter of the plat to be submitted to Spokane County for approval, this Company has examined the records of the Spokane County Auditors and Clerks offices, and the records of the Clerk of the United States District Court holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby cer- tifies the title to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to wit: A portion of land in Government Lot 9, in Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 E.W.M., more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 9; thence North 00 ° 39'00" West along the West line of said Section 4, a dis- tance of 435.39 feet to the True Point of Beginning for this de- scription; thence continuing North 00 ° 39'00" West a distance of 215.16 feet to a point of a non - tangent curve having a radial bear- ing South 4 ° 32'16" East; thence along a curve to the right (having a delta 8 ° 49'40" and a radius of 440.00 feet) 67.79 feet; thence South 85 ° 42'36" East 542.76 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta of 50 ° 09'44" and a radius 380.00 feet) 332.69 feet; thence North 44 ° 07'40" East a dis- tance of 365.56 feet to a point of a curve; thence along a curve to the left (having a delta 26 ° 04'08" and a radius 380.00 feet) 172.90 feet; thence North 18 ° 03'32" East 116.80 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a delta 14 ° 55'31" and a ra- dius 440.00 feet) 114.62 feet to a non - tangent point on the curve, said point having a radial bearing South 57 ° 00'57" East; thence North 89 ° 11'04" East 73.84 feet; thence South 35 ° 19'43" West 25.56 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta 17 ° 16'11" and a radius 380.00 feet) 114.54 feet; thence South 18 ° 03'32" West 116.80 feet to a point of a curve; (continued) Transamerica Title Insurance Company , North 720 Argonne Road . Spokane. Washington 99212 (509) 922-2222 Order No. RM- 116555 -M Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat of VALLEY VISTA ESTATES thence along the curve to the right (having a delta of 19 ° 30'50" and a radius 440.00 feet) 149.86 feet to a non - tangent point on the curve having a radial bearing North 52 ° 25'39" West; thence South 45 ° 52'20" East 199.88 feet; thence South 44 ° 07'40" East, 415.79 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a delta of 21 °55'59" and a radius 637.00 feet) 243.85 feet to a non - tangent point on a curve having a radial bearing North 23 ° 56'21" West; thence South 23 ° 56'21" East 282.53 feet; thence South 01 ° 21'03" West 50.00 feet; thence North 88° 38'57" West 224.77 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a delta 36 ° 33'16" and a radius 355.00 feet) 226.49 feet; thence North 52 ° 05'41" West 149.10 feet; thence South 37 ° 54'19" West 170.00 feet; thence North 52 ° 05'41" West 149.09 feet; thence North 48 ° 15'43" West 311.89 feet to the point of beginning; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. VESTED IN: JOHN and LLOYDA KIRKLAND,'husband and wife, as to the Northeast quarter of the West half of Government Lot 9; and, RALPH D. GUTHRIE and GE-RTRUDE 0. GUTHRIE as to the remainder. EXCEPTIONS: (continued) Order No. RM 16555 -M Page 2 1. Real estate excise tax pursuant to the authority of RCW Chapter 28.45 and subsequent amendments thereto. 2. General taxes as follows, together with interest and penalty, if any, after delinquency: Tax Account No. Year Annual Billing Amount Paid Balance Due 04442 -9083 1981 $173.20 0.00 $173.20 1982 $380.70 0.00 $380.70 1983 $371.98 0.00 $371.98 3. CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Seller: John Kirkland and Lloyda Kirkland, husband and wife Purchaser: cGuthrie Investments, Inc., a Washington corp. Dated: July -1968 Recorded: October 15, 1968 Recording No.: 391132C Covers: NE 1/4 of W 1/2 of Govt. Lot 9 in sd Section 4 The above Contract of Sale was made subordinate to the lien of the Mortgage recorded as Document No. 515400C by Subordination Agreement recorded November 7, 1973 as Document No. 7311070033 in Official Volume 179, page 732. Order No. k. -M Page 3 PURC ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT AND DEED AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantor: Guthrie Investments, Inc., a Washington corp. Purchaser: Ralph D. Guthrie and Gertrude 0. Guthrie, hus- band and wife Dated: March 5, 1974 Recorded: March 12, 1974 Recording No.: 7403120188 4. MORTGAGE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Mortgagor: John Kirkland and Lloyda Kirkland, husband and wife Mortgagee: Lewis E. Sills and Grace D. Sills, husband and wife Amount: $16,997.16 Dated: October 15, 1970 Recorded: October 20, 1970 Recording No.: 515400C Covers: The Northeast quarter of the West half of Gvt. Lot 9 of said Sec. 4 and other property ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE: Assignor: Lewis E. Sills and Grace D. Sills, husband and wife Assignee: <Eva_ElizabethTBreen, a widow Dated: November 2, 1973 Recorded: November 7, 1973 Recording No.: 7311070034 5. WATER SYSTEM AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Between: The Washington Water Power Company, a corporation And: Guthrie Investments Incorporated Purpose: To provide rights of way for water and electric facilities Dated: May 31, 1973 Recording No.: 224577 6. MORTGAGE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Mortgagor: Ralph D. Guthrie and Gertrude 0. Guthrie, husband and wife, and Valley Vista Convalescent Center, a corporation Mortgagee: Commerce Mortgage 'Company, a corporation Amount: $287,500.00 Dated: March 23, 1977 Recorded: March 30, 1977 Recording No.: 7703300276 Affects: This and other property (continued) 7. STATE TAX WARRANT Warrant No.: Against: In favor of State For: Entered: Judgment No.: 8. JUDGMENT In favor Against: Amount: of: Rainier National Bank John and Lloyda Kirkland $87,207.66 (A), $6,771.86 (B), $5,000.00 (C), + $127.85 costs, plus interest Filed: April 20, 1977 Judgment No.: 8980 Court Cause No.: 235225 Attorney for creditor: M. Johnson 9. JUDGMENT: In favor of: Against: Amount: Filed: Judgment No.: Court Cause No.: 11. JUDGMENT: In favor of: Against: 12. STATE TAX WARRANT: Warrant No.; Against: C163671 John Kirkland and wife, dba of Washington $2,661.81 and interest December 24, 1975 A -3 page 1871 Order No. RI 16555 -M Page 4 and Lloyda M. Kirkland, husband Kirkland Construction Dept. of Labor and Industries John T. Kirkland et ux $1,761.98 plus interest December 13, 1977 10828 243272 10. JUDGMENT: In favor of: Fischer & Porter Co. Against: John Kirkland dba Wastewater Service Amount: $4,486.32 + $92.40 costs, plus interest Filed: January 27, 1978 Judgment No.: 11161 Court Cause No.: 244133 Attorney for creditor: B. Erickson Inland Farmers, Inc John Kirkland et ux dba Kirkland Construction Company Amount: $1,184.43 plus interest Filed: August 9, 1979 Judgment No.: 79 -5- 02207 -7 Court Cause No.: 79205167 -0 Attorney for creditor: Carl Diana 12577 John T. Kirkland and Jane Doe Kirkland, his wife, dba Waste Water Service In favor of State of Washington For: $4,020.92 Entered: May 27, 1981 Judgment No.: 81- 5- 1693 -1 Court Cause No.: 81201853 -4 (continued) • 13. JUDGMENT: In favor of: Consolidated Supply Co., a Washington corp. Against: John Kirkland and Mrs. John Kirkland, husband and wife Amount: $17,931.79 plus interest Filed: October 27, 1982 Judgment No.: 82904019 -3 Court Cause No.: 82201900 -8 Attorney for creditor: Paine, Hamblen, Coffin & Brooke kent Order No. 1 116555 -M Page 5 Records examined to September 26, 1983 at 8:00 A.M. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By: 1 /- _ Robert Myler / cess A G R I L M N J THIS AGREEMENT made dnd entered into this day of _. .1982, by and between RALPH GUTHRIE, hereinafter reterred to as the "Grantor" dnd SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "Grantee ", jointly referred to as the "Parties ". WITNESSETH For and in consideration of the covenants herein contained, the GRANTOR hereby agrees to convey to the GRANTEE the following - described property situated in Spokane County, Washington, to -wit: Those portions of the following described lands lying Northerly of the proposed road as shown on the map attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. Government Lot 8 in the Northwest Quarter of Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, N.M. EXCEPT that portion lying North and West of Ponderosa Drive and also EXCEPT Short Plat No. 78 -042. Government Lot 9 in the Northwest Quarter of Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M.; EXCEPT that portion in the plat of Ponderosa Hills. The East Half of Government Lot 10 in the Northeast Quarter of Section 5, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M.; EXCEPT that portion in the plat of Ponderosa Hills. As consideration for the conveyance, the PARTIES agree as follows: 1. The GRANTOR shall be responsible for all surveying and engineering service necessary to formalize the final conveyance. 2. the GRANTOR shall execute and deliver to the GRANTEE a Warranty Deed conveying fee simple title. 3. The GRANTEE shall not be responsible for any cost associated with the con- struction of the road that constitutes the Southerly boundary of the afore - described lands. 4. It is agreed by the PARTIES hereto that the distribution of the assessment for Road Improvements on Ponderosa Drive under County Road improvement District No. 373 against Parcel No. 04442-90/8 in tht: total amount of $12,193.48 shall be shared as follows: $r,31h.?u shall htt asses, a'Ininit the said parcel following int normal RID pro- tilt othi'e iru ur ies ;n li st rIC 'yu 41i.'. :. she): l hr dlsl' Wirt. ii ili�:n �Ib! I - $4,908.64 Shall be due dnd uwincl 1 I the GWII{i t.r. Jlip4'c 'utility Upon the development of the remainder of said 1'd,i.e1 No. 04447 -9071: due and Iro/cihle before final approval of any plat or other dr•vtdopment: of the Said parcel_ 5. The GRANTEE shall have no responsibility to develop the lands being con- veyed. It is the desire of the PARTIES to leave the area in its native condition. 6. The PARTIES agree that the covenants set forth herein shall be finalized within 12 months of the date of this (agreement. This agreement may be extended by mutual consent of the parties. If the agreement its extended, the Grantor shall pay, in addition to the $4,908.64 set forth in paragraph 4, interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum on said sum from the date of this agreement. 7. This agreement shall insure to the benefit of and be binding on the heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the PARTIES. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands the day and year above written. RALPH GUTHRIE APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ATTEST: DATE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS - OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Clerk of the Board STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) On this day personally appeared before me _ known to be the individual described herein who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that __ the same as free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and puroses therein mentioned. Given under my hand and seal this day of Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Spokane, Washington. A G R E E M E N T THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of 19, by and between RALPH GUTHRIE, hereinafter referred to as the "Grantor" and SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "Grantee ", jointly referred to as the "Parties ". WITNESSETH For and in consideration of the convenants herein contained, the GRANTOR hereby agrees to convey to the GRANTEE the following described property situated in Spokane County, Washington, to -wit: Those portions of the following described lands lying Northerly of the proposed road as shown on the map attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. Government Lot 8 in the Northwest Quarter (NW') of Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M. EXCEPT that portion lying North and West of Ponderosa Drive and also EXCEPT Short Plat No. 78 -042. Government Lot 9 in the Northwest Quarter (NW') of Section 4, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M.; EXCEPT that portion in the plat of Ponderosa Hills. The East Half (Eli) of Government Lot 10 in the Northeast Quarter (NEa) of Section 5, Township 24 North, Range 44 East, W.M.; EXCEPT that portion in the plat of Ponderosa Hills. As consideration for the conveyance, the PARTIES agree as follows: 1. The GRANTOR shall be responsible for all surveying and engineering service necessary to formalize the final conveyance. 2. The GRANTOR shall execute and deliver to the GRANTEE a Warranty Deed conveying fee simple title. 3. The GRANTEE shall not be responsible for any cost associated with the construction of the road that constitutes the Southerly boundary of the afore - described lands. 4. It is agreed by the PARTIES hereto that the distribution of the assess- ment for Road Improvements on Ponderosa Drive under County Road Improvement District No. 373 against Parcel No. 04442 -9078 in the total amount of $12,193.48 shall be shared as follows: $2,376.20 shall be assessed against the said parcel following the .normal RID process; $4,908.64 shall be distributed amongst the other properties in the District; $4,908.64 shall be due and owing from the GRANTOR to Spokane County upon the development of the remainder of said Parcel No. 04442 -9078 due and payable before final approval of any plat or other development of the said parcel. 5. The GRANTEE shall have no responsibility to develop the lands being conveyed. It is the desire of the PARTIES to leave the area in its native con- dition; however, Spokane County will, by permit, allow the Grantor to place upon the lands to be conveyed a storm water storage pond and appurtenant facil- ities as approved by the County Engineer. All installation and maintenance cost to be the sole responsibility of the Grantor. 6. The PARTIES agree that the convenants set forth herein shall be final- ized within 12 months of the date of this agreement. This agreement may be extended by mutual consent of the parties. If the agreement is extended, the Grantor shall pay, in addition to the $4,908.64 set forth in paragraph 4, interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum on said sum from the date of this agreement. 7. This agreement shall insure to the benefit of and be binding on the heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the PARTIES. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands the day and year above written. RALPH GUTHRIE SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON APPROVED BY SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ATTEST: DATE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ss On this day personally appeared before me known to be the individual described herein who executed the within and fore- going instrument and acknowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and seal this day of BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF Clerk of the Board , 19 . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Spokane, Washington. TO THE Spokane C Engineers ORI)EI1 OF �/ / /// / / // /� County u _ at lIR P ReA... -■a_ /2 44, 11'00361.211' E: 125 i000341:0093"1775 GUTIIRIE INVESTMENTS, INC. E. 9211 TRENT AVENUE 926-1561 SPOKANE, WASITINGTON 99216 0i B Spoken. n,W:�ng� O BK808 ® pit E yo7 3612 August 16 1J 83 28 -3 /1251 LLARS ` ` RECEIPT Date 4u 6* /f, 191 6901 Received From &- I i -{ pR I P - Y1 , VFS7- M ENT s • Address P • - - LI `ip e - /( Dollars $ ` - For • : f6 EP I= — �, (_t _ a E AC OUNT HOW PAID - - ACCOU F -. CASH - COUNTY - ENGINE - ER - N. 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 BY Am!. PAID CHECK In BALANCE DUE MONEY - ___,,, TO THE Spokane C Engineers ORI)EI1 OF �/ / /// / / // /� County u _ at lIR P ReA... -■a_ /2 44, 11'00361.211' E: 125 i000341:0093"1775 GUTIIRIE INVESTMENTS, INC. E. 9211 TRENT AVENUE 926-1561 SPOKANE, WASITINGTON 99216 0i B Spoken. n,W:�ng� O BK808 ® pit E yo7 3612 August 16 1J 83 28 -3 /1251 LLARS May 5, 1983 ile No.cPS, 1407 -81 Findings & Order Valley Vista Estates A. INTRODUCTION SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER This matter having come before the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee on May 5, 1983 and the members of the Committee present being Ron McVicker, Chairperson, Ken Kennedy and Lynn Tennican. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Guthrie Investments, Inc., is requesting approval of an Extension of Time for PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES, and Zone Change ZS- 40 -81, Unclassified to R -1 for subdivision of 11 acres into 12 lots for single- family dwellings, and there being present, the following applicant or representative: C. FINDINGS OF FACT Art Noll 1. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 2. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 3. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapproval of the proposed Extension of Time. 4. That the information in the STAFF REPORT was considered. 5. That substantial progress has been made toward finalization of this preliminary plat and will be finalized Summer of 1983. 6. That this proposal does constitute "fill -in" development for the SUBURBAN category, for the Priority Sewer Service Area, and for existing public services and facilities in the vicinity. D. SPECIAL EXPLANATION OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS DECISION Those conditions as listed in the May 5, 1983 STAFF REPORT, as amended below. PLANNING CONDITIONS . 2. That the preliminary plat be given one (1) additional year conditional approval to June 1, 1984. May 5, 1983 ,Ile No. PS- 1407 -81 Findings & Order Valley Vista Estates E. ORDER \The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of PS- 1407 -81, Valley Vista Estates, and Zone Change ZS- 40 -81, Unclassified to R -1 for an Extension of Time is hereby APPROVED to June 1, 1984. ATTEST: Motion by: Ken Kennedy Vote: • Unanimous Ron McVicker - Aye Ken Kennedy - Aye Lynn Tennican - Aye JOHN NUNNERY Subdivision Administrator Seconded by: Lynn Tennican HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY...ATTEST TO THE ABOVE (FINDINGS, AND VOTE. Chairperson i C Hearing Examiner Com -ittee Actions - May 5, 1983 (8. PS- 1407 -81; VALLEY VISTA ESTATES ZS- 40 -81, J Unclassified to R -1 Sponsor: 926 -1561 Guthrie Investments, Inc. E. 9211 Trent Spokane, WA 99206 Surveyor /Engineer: 926 - 5959 Gene Welborn E. 7011 2nd Spokane, WA 99206 Location: The proposal is located in the Ponderosa area and 1/4 mile west of the Dishman -Mica Rd. and Mohawk Drive intersection; within Section 4, Township 24, Range 44 EWM., Spokane County, Washington Comprehensive Plan: SUBURBAN Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 11 acres into 12 lots for single- family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 11 acres from Unclassified to R -1. Action: Unanimous approval for only one additional year. 9. PE- 1409 -61, MONTE DEL REY 1ST ADDITION ZE- 66 -81, Agricultural to Agricultural, R -1 and Multiple Family Suburban Sponsor: 456 -8819 Harold Lundy S. 1115 Cedar Spokane, WA 99204 Location: The proposal is located on the Spokane Valley lying north of the Trent section; within Section 31 & 32, Township 26N, Range 45 Surveyor /Engineer: 327 - 7793 Gerald Masgai N. 2919 Monroe Spokane, WA 99205 south - facing slopes of the and Barker Road inter- EWM., Spokane County, WA Comprehensive Plan: URBAN Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 72 acres into 103 lots for single family dwellings and multiple family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 72 acres from Agricultural to Agricultural, R - and Multiple Family Suburban, as approved. Action: Unanimous approval for of one additional year. -4 Hearing Examiner Conmitte ctions - May 5, 1983 5. PE- 1306A -79, SUNRISE EAST 1ST AUDITION ZE- 111-79, Agricultural to Agricultural and R -1 Sponsor: 928 -0600 Gordon Curry 9209 E. Trent Spokane, WA 99206 Surveyor /Enqineer: 926 -1322 Richard L. Simpson N. 909 Argonne Rd. Spokane, WA 99206 Location: The proposal is located in the Otis Orchards area south and adjacent Wellesley Ave. and east and adjacent Lynden Ave.; within Section 3, Township 25N, Range 45 EWM., Spokane County, Washington Comprehensive Plan: URBAN Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 6 acres into 7 lots for single - family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 6 acres from Agricultural to Agricultural and R -1. Action: Unanimous approval for only one additional year. 6. PN 1355 - 79, PEONE PRAIRIE ESTATES 3RD ADDITION ZN- 249 -79, Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban and R -1 Sponsor: 466 -6271 466 -3184 J.E. Upham & E.M. Jones Rt. 3 Box 9 Rt. 3 Box 10 Mead, WA 99021 Mead, WA 99021 Surveyor /Engineer:.. 534 - 5272 Mike Senski S..104 Spokane, WA 99262 Location: The proposal is located in the between Farwell and Peone Roads and 1/4 Road; within Section 11, Township 26N, Range 43 EWM., Comprehensive Plan: SUBURBAN Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an ?extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 63 acres into 62 lots for single - family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 63 acres from Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban and R -l. Action: Unanimous approval for only one additional year. Fr -80, MONACO ADDITION ZE- 63 -80, Agricultural to Commercial Sponsor: 926 -6277 Eugene Monaco E. 14820 Sprague Ave. Spokane, WA 99216 Mead area adjacent and mile west of Fairview Spokane County, Washington Surveyor /Enqineer: 535 - 1410 Patrick J. Moore S. 25 Altamont Spokane, WA 99202 Location: The proposal is located in the Spokane Valley south and adjacent Sprague Ave. and between Adams and Progress Roads, within Section 23, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM., Spokane County, Washington Comprehensive Plan: COMMERCIAL Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "extension of preliminary plat approval to divide 2.29 acres into commercial use and to change the zoning on the 2.29 Agricultural to Commercial. Action ^ Unanimous approval for 3 vtars. time" of the 2 lots for acres from STAFF REPORT May 5, 1983 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF RE: EXTENSION OF TIME for PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES 25 - 40 - 81, Unclassified to R -1 I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Sponsor: 926 -1561 Surveyor /Engineer: 926 - 5959 Guthrie Investments, Inc. E. 9211 Trent Spokane, WA 99206 B. Location: The proposal is located in the Ponderosa area and 1/4 mile west of the Dishman -Mica Rd. and Mohawk Drive intersection; within Section 4, Township 24N, Range 44 EWM., Spokane County, Washington C. Comprehensive Plan: SUBURBAN D. History: The proposal was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee May 1981 under the provisions of State law for the three -year time extensions. The sponsor indicates the substantial progress has been made; as, part of the surveying is complete, the water plan is finished and approved, the road and drainage plans are being redesigned and working with County Engineer's Department. The sponsor is planning to finalize this preliminary plat this summer. E. Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 11 acres into 12 lots for single - family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 11 acres from Unclassified to R -1. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION Gene Welborn E. 7011 2nd Spokane, WA 99206 The Planning Department had recommended that this preliminary plat approval be brought into conformance with the then new RCW 58.17 regarding the amount of time allowed before a preliminary plat must be finalized. State law allowed a preliminary plat three (3) years (without any new conditions) and allows one extension of time for one year, if the sponsor requests the additional year; however, this 4th year may have new conditions added. Three years have passed and the sponsor having made progress is now asking for the additional year extension of approval. No other additional conditions of approval are being recommended.by the remaining departments. 31 STAFF REPORT, May 5, 198" 1 III. CONDITIONS If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. PLANNING CONDITIONS 1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record. 2. That the preliminary plat be given one (1) additional year conditional approval to June 1, 1984. That -ama^s+ =a =this preliminary plat approval will become NULL & VOID after the above expiration date and a new application and hearing will be required. 3 PS- 1.407 -81 30 a. y OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 14,a, Cerott Date Ast BASIN DESIGNATION e/4•0.. -re f VI ST/' PROJECT CALC C.- S• 1-1-- DATE 5 /7/87.-CHECK DATE SOIL GROUP E. AREA /2 (Acres) SLOPE ?...9 ° A) % • CURVE NUMBER: LAND USE / p v � RUNOFF DEPTH: (Q) PEAK DISCHARGE: HYDRAULIC LENGTH CHART FLAT (0 -2 %) MODERATE (3 % -7 %) STEEP ( >8 %) Zq9 P2 P a.o P50 ,2 P100 �•6 PRESENT CONDITION al Cfl 6/ 50 �I /G 0 EQUIV. X PEAK DISCHARGE cfs /in. cfs /in. X 41.30 cfs /in. WEIGHTED CN: cfs /in. X Q2 010 o.o 73 Q50 °' /b Q100 o,Z2(o 6 -15 in. Q2 in. Qin in. Q50 in. Q100 -g FUTURE CONDITION 0 PRODUCT _eO•T 3o.f 0.073 6 •i67 Os 2.2.6 in. in. in. in. ft. EQUIV. AREA /S/ f Acres SLOPE _ ADJ. EQUIV. PEAK FACTOR DISCHARGE in. = D cfs. in. D1n 2/ cfs. in. D50 so.o cfs. in. D100_ 7 cfs. 35"-- cfs /in. ADJ. EQUIV. PEAK DISCHARGE X ACTUAL AREA = ADJ. PEAK DISCHARGE EQUIV. AREA 53 cfs /in. X / Acres = 2-9? cfs /in. /67 7 • Acres ADJ. PEAK DISCHARGE (cfs /in.) X Q (in.) = DESIGN DISCHARGE FIGURE 10 • �/ 5'69 1 \i ( 100 ••n 5274 T. 251 T. 241 52 73 52 72 '/ 52 70 35 5)68 6 AGENDA, May 5, 1983 - HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE 9 A.M. (or as soon thereafter as possible) A. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - EXTENSION OF TIME (continued) 6 PN- 1355 -79, PEONE PRAIRIE ESTATES 3RD ADDITION ZN 249 Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban and R -1 Sponsor: 466 -6271 J.E. Upham & Rt. 3 Box 9 Mead, WA 99021 Location: The proposal is located in the Mead area adjacent and between Farwell and Peone Roads and 1/4 mile west of 'Fairview Road; within. Section 11, Township 26N, Range 43 EWM., Spokane County, Washington' Comprehensive Plan: SUBURBAN Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 63 acres into 62 lots for single-family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 63 acres from Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban and R -I. 7. PE- 1371 -80, MONACO ADDITION .page 12 ZE- 63 -80, Agricultural to Commercial Sponsor: 926 -6277 Eugene Monaco E. 14820 Sprague A Spokane, WA 99216 466 -3184 E.M. Jones Rt. 3 Box 10 Mead, WA 99021 Surveyor /Engineer:. 534 - 5272 Mike Senski S. 104 Freya Spokane, WA 99262 Surveyor /Engineer: 535 Patrick J. Moore ve. S. 25 Altamont Spokane, WA 99202 page 11 • Location: The proposal is located in the Spokane Valley south and, adjacent Sprague Ave. and between Adams and Progress Roads, within` Section 23, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM., Spokane County, Washington, Comprehensive Plan: COMMERCIAL Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an. 'extension of time" of the • preliminary plat approval to divide 2.29 acres into 2 lots for commercial use and to change the zoning on the 2.29 acres from Agricultural to Commercial. 8.tRS= 1.407 =81p VALLEY VISTA ESTATES ZS- 40 -81, Unclassified to R -1 Sponsor: 926 -1561 Guthrie Investments, Inc. E. 9211 Trent Spokane, WA 99206 Surveyor /Engineer: 926 -5959 Gene Welborn E. 7011 2nd Spokane, WA 99206 Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the preliminary plat approval to divide 11 acres into 12 lots for single- family dwellings and to change the zoning on the 11 acres from Unclassified to R -1 3 page 13: Location: The proposal is located in the Ponderosa area and 1/4 mile' west of the Dishman -Mica Rd. and Mohawk Drive intersection; within. Section 4, Township 24, Range 44 EWM., Spokane County, Washington Comprehensive Plan: SUBURBAN - 13 - BMc /set Form 327 —C.R. OFFICE OF COUNTY, ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date April 6 .19 83 Inter - office Communication To Spokane County Subdivision Administrator From Bob McCann, Land Development Coordinator Subject Time Extension Requests Scheduled for Hearing May 5, 1983 PS 1165 - Ewell Addition PS 1197 - Bly Garber PE 1267 - Schlender Addition PS 1302 - Sullivan & Hughes PE 1306 "A" - Sunrise East PN 1355 - Peone Prairie Estates 3rd Addition P - Monaco Addition - Valley Vista Est. PE 1409 - Monte Del Rey 1st Addition PE 1410 - Replat Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 Huchenson Addition ' Mr. Art Noll' ':'E }.' 9211 :iirent Road* Spokane, WA 99206 E :. Val ley •Vi'sta Estates';PPE: #14tJ7,. •RID. Proposal,•: • Dear Mr. Noll In our letter of May 4, 1982 relating to a: proposed Road Improvement District •in Valley, Vista Estates,',PE #1407, the amount of .525•.00 per front foot was cited as the estimated cost' of the improvement. .Th.is estimate•. is ' based upon our experience with similar. roadway sections. As yet we: have not received a. p.lan for:the proposed roads in this plat.: • Observation of_'the si'te,and its proximity ?to the drainage area lead us to believe the:_ road' construction` -cost could, be considerably` higher - than : normal or as •estimated A,close estimate will be difficult to make until the = pl ans hay.e been prepared by your engineer and approved by,this office •. Consequently, you niay want to delay 'submission of the: -RID .petition until`. that' has :'.been,accompli shed : su that you review the road location ,With Gary `Nelson a nd - Jim Haines. of office . . before the design :work proceeds Very•truly yours, Robert S. turner; P:E:" Spokane_ County Engineer 4 SPONAN COUNTY COURT MOUSE Mr. Art Noll E. 9211 Trent Road Spokane, WA 99206 Dear Mr. Noll: VS /set cc: vHlson, Haines, Maag 4 OFFIOE OF COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT 5. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER Srosuvr; ,gyp s=ivtyrov 99260 May 19, 1982 RE: Valley Vista Estates, PE #140 RID Proposal In our letter of May 4, 1982 relating to a proposed Road Improvement District in Valley Vista Estates, PE #1407, the amount of $25.00 per front foot was cited as the estimated cost of the improvement. This estimate is based upon our experience with similar roadway sections. As yet we have not received a plan for the proposed roads in this plat. Observation of the site and its proximity to the drainage area lead us to believe the road construction cost could be considerably higher than normal or as estimated. A close estimate will be difficult to make until the plans have been prepared by your engineer and approved by this office. Consequently, you may want to delay submission of the RID petition until that has been accomplished. It is suggested that you review the road location with Gary Nelson and Jim Haines of this office before the design work proceeds. Very truly yours, Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Verril ale Engine ring Administrator Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456 -3600 JN /bkr A 771 e to ft • E C.EI VEL WR31 OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Building & Safety Department To Engineers, Utilities, Environmental Health t • y�l�av -.• "A. From Planning Department - Subdivisions_ - Jchn Nunnery - Subject One -Year Administrative Review of Plats for the purpose of adding new Conditions Our files indicate that the one -year administrative review period for subdivisions indicated below is upon us for the purpose of adding new conditions to past • approved subdivisions. Should your department find that .new conditions are required, the Planning Department will schedule a public hearing. However, if no new conditions are to he attached, the subdivision approval will automatically continue to the second year. If no response by April 8, the subdivision will receive approval with the existing conditions. PE- 1409 -81 & ZE -66 -81 - MONTE DEL REY PE- 1410 -81 & ZE -57 -81 - REPLAT OF LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 2 OF HUTCHINSON'S ADD. PS- 1407 -81 & ZS -40 -81 - VALLEY VISTA ESTATES f irnu# PA Date March 30, 19 82 tit Tit August 116, 1981 Mr. Gary Kennaly Planning and Traffic Engineer Spokane County Engineers Office North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington, 99258 RE: PE-11407. =81 Dear Gary, As I discussed with you recently, I am interested in utilizing an R.I.D. to construct: the improvements for the above preliminary plat. I ask that your office prepare any necessary petitions and /or other forms necessary to initiate the process. It, is also my understanding that within Myron Estates #8 to the north of this project:an R.I.D. is presently in processing and some special conditions have been attached to it.. Specifically: t) elimination of the curb on the east side of . Ponderosa Drive where property is to be deeded to the park department 2) transfer of the assessments that.would normally be paid by the park department to other properties within Myron Estates #8 that are privately owned. As it is apparently the intention of Mr. Guthrie to also deed the property west of my project to the park department, I ask that you give consideration to imposing the same conditions as described above. I also ask that you give consideration to eliminating the sidewalk along Ponderosa Drive, as it will be the only sidewalk in the area. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Robert J. Bethards RECEIVED g, 4N4 COUNT! ENGINEER 1 AUG171981 OS• ° /' '80 Sc tcv-er shmafl M cc,. lo• 05 A c-k.,Lcd h had ex \ ivy t� Mir a 1006 880 309 44 5 9-ls (0 97 a 3 0 1 7 ac, 6 \cri'vt on_a_ 0* Sortc\.> e.3kimo 4c. Vv / 9 5 / C u22ew$ Cj _ c LO11.` 1 1 SOOp , 00 300 ® \-1.10 /ANNUw, /eo4T1t vac ce 3 �/ atS7k _ vofte 2,J _ Ce 1 begfi +(Qyk I) R i! c e � ►� cu.SQ. 11 R Acc _ Loc r o n) S n �` YV — 0-T Sat re 1 64-€4 t 90 \ot5 � 3 00 / LOT 1011 3 3 1 4 974 r v40 M = 3g I`iv = 4ZL /tn. a 477- A- 11 Arc PSs - 3 3, 3 8' 3 Y3Z• 4/88 5 5/ coo s€ r$1 Acce. -- 0 at iiilt STAFF ANALYSIS, May 28, .181 PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES ZS- 40 -81, UNCLASSIFIED TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R -1) Preliminary Subdivision and Zone Reclassification The Valley Vista Estates proposal was continued from the April 29, 1981 Hearing. The Hearing Examiner Committee, at that time, heard testimony in regard to the requirements of SEPA, the State Environmental Policy Act, upon review of this testimony the Committee instructed the Planning Department to circulate the Environmental Checklist with a proposed Declaration of Non - Significance The checklist has been circulated. The Hearing Examiner Committee also instructed the Planning Department to write a letter to Mr. Guthrie who owns adjacent property surrounding the proposal to insure that he is aware of the impacts this proposal would have on his property and inform him of the hearing so if he wishes to make a statement he can do so. The letter has been sent (with a copy given to the Chairman) and at the time of this writing no comments have been received from Mr. Guthrie. k WCNILQdy J 1.0 :II iw m5 c C N R_ ST s I . u es ‘1, & vc, re a m ? tk sitcve vin a In sArc� t1•D• C Re \ati fi U Acts) ND ?Lanni in Dc'Pt. Y / es .' 5 k o' Scbt,,st z – ill o 71 c jc T aira ;Ad-0 Q r-41 -unr i eirA S94.- ca ateutA 6r, Intl el a . BQtk►a2aS to AS s¢.Q��R -A-'E pint u '1 nTe'a e sTs Fro- n t.T[1 Ye.4 it • &UT Qte. V\As It go' Qiuns V t?rc czy . 3. M &t; Ni 6) Ut \ \ca e% — t40 ReQ X0(2 e...r . aw• 155 t&C V 43 � p c I A 2 al O A-) e-f ' A*.ir S (z ep4Qs e Ln RL Artit a c i 1/4 A i t & O o. k sivpomapa 4 5 lJ Vitch c ,s ni Assess sr► • AGENDA, MAW. 28, 1981 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Thursday, May 28, 1981 - 9:00 A.M.(Item #1 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION (CONTINUATION) PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES ZS- 40 -81, UNCLASSIFIED TO SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R -1) a. Location: Located south of that area generally known as the Ponderosa and west of Painted Hills development area. It is adjacent to and south of the Myron Estates No. 8 Subdivision and approximately 1/4 mile west of the intersection of Mohawk Drive and the Dishman Mica Road. b. Legal Description: Section 4, Township 24N, Range 44 EWM Being a legal description of a portion of Government Lot 9, Section 4, County of Spokane, State of Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the NW corner of Lot 9, th. E 1330 ft. along the N line of Lot 9, to the west line of Ponderosa Drive as monumented in Myron 8 Estates, also being the true point of beginning of this legal description, th. S 34 °W 530 ft. to a point of curvature, th. SW1y 324.98 ft. along a curve to the right to a point of tangency; th. S 82 °W 430 ft. to an angle point; th. S 8 °E 60 ft. to an angle point; th. S 82 °W 170 ft. to an angle point; th. S 16 °E 260 ft. to an angle point; th. S 3 °W 325 ft. to an angle point; th. E 265 ft. to an angle point; th. N 21 °E 285 ft. to an angle point; th. S 68 °E 20 ft. to an angle point; th. N 30 °E 265 ft. to an angle point; th. N 87° E 515 ft. to an angle point; th. N 37 °E 175 ft. to an angle point; th. N 18 °E 75ft. to an angle point; th. N 60 °W 320 ft. to an angle point; th. N 34 °E 480 ft. to the north line of Lot 9; th. W 72ft. along the N line of Lot 9 to the true point of beginning, containing 11 acres more or less. c. Sponsor: Robert Bethards P.O. Box 2704, T.A. Spokane, WA. 99220 d. Surveyor: Billy J. Tucker E 12721 Sprague Spokan,e WA. 99216 e. Site Size: 11 acres f. Number of Lots: 12 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Unclassified i. Proposed Zoning: R -1 j. Water Source: Washington Water Power Co. k. School District: Central Valley #356 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Septic tanks m. Environmental Impact: Regarding the State Environmental Policy Act, this proposal has been examined by the Planning Department staff. Pursuant to WAC 197 -10 -040 (29) and 197 -10 -060, the staff has determined that all of the land to the south, bounded by the railroad and the terrain features of Brown's Mountain, is functionally related to the present proposal. When reviewing the direct and indirect impacts of the total proposal, it is the staff's position that a declaration of significance should be issued and an Environmental Impact Statement prepared. However, a final decision can only be made after consideration of testimony and reports associated with the scheduled public hearing. n. Reason for Continuation: Proposal was continued to May 28, 1981 at 9:00 A.M. to allow staff an opportunity to circulate the Environmental Checklist to agencies of jurisdiction. - 1 - PO^+09G OR. 3 RD CT AVEN F RRET • ' Cir.V,RQUN OR PO tr0 ERO SA A CRES ADD. 481H AVE. HOL M4N� 1 ROAD ORIVE ,-/ 4_ P&1407-81 _ HALLETT - IA R ^S 1 =1000 RP B. PROPOSAL SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER 1 No. PS- 1407 -81 ZS -40 -81 A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on May 28, 1981 and the members of the Committee present being Ken Kennedy, Chairperson, Kathy Carstens and Jerry Williams. The sponsor, Robert Bethards, is requesting approval of a preliminary plat and zone change, PS- 1407 -81, Valley Vista Estates and ZS- 40 -81, Unclassified to R -1 for subdivision of 10.88 acres into 12 lots for single family dwellings and there being present, the following applicant or representative: STAN SCHULTZ AND ROBERT J. BETHARDS C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is vacant. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Suburban Category. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Unclassified. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guide- lines (WAC 197 and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assess- ment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the phusical environment; a finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of this project; and a final declaration of non - significance . is hereby to be issued. b. That this project and ownership is separate from the adjacent 300 acres to the south and that the fee established for a future railroad crossing is adequate to provide the transportation facilities necessary for this area. That piecemeal development is not desirable for this area, however, legal requirements of the SEPA guidelines leads the Committee to issue a final declaration of non - significance. D. ORDER No. PS- 1407 -81 ZS -40 -81 The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Robert Bethards for the determination of SEPA requirements as described in the application should be issued a final declaration of non - significance. Motion by: Williams Seconded by: Carstens Vote: Unanimously to issue a final declaration of non - significance. E. FINDINGS OF FACT 1 That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 2. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 3. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 4. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use is not detrimental to :the general purpose or otherwise harmful to the public health, safety, and welfare. 5. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor dis- approval of the proposed use. F. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS SUBDIVISION APPROVAL: PLANNING CONDITIONS 1 That the plat be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and /or attached sheets as noted. \2\ That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one dwelling unit be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. 3. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be 'held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A I' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) 4.i That appropriate street names be indicated. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 2 F No. PS- 1407 -81 ZS-40 -81 n 6./ That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to appli- cation for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the filing of the final plat. \8.\ That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolu- tion #77 -1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improve- ments. `2 That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 10. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non- significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the phusical environment; a finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of this project; and a final declaration of non - significance is hereby to be issued. C11 There will be no phasing of the project, and the plat will be finalized in its entirety unless approved by the Subdivision Administrator. 3 F No. PS- 1407 -81 ZS -40 -81 12. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to June 1, 1983, a time extension public hearing before the Hearing Examiner Committee may be required after one year if new conditions are recommended because of an administrative review by agencies of jurisdiction. The project sponsor is responsible for requesting an Extension of Time prior to June 1, 1983. 13. That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning shall be changed to Single Family Residential (R -1). ENGINEER CONDITIONS '.° That the proposed plat is subject to the provisions of Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution #80 -1592 as amended. P 2. That conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer is given subject to dedication of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 3 . That plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 41 That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the. direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certifi- cate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right - way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. All construction within the existing or proposed public right -of -way is to be completed prior to filing plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, con- struction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. �9. Road design, construction, and drainage control for half right -of -ways and stub road connections are the responsibility of the Developer. 10.) That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded. A 1 foot strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de 'sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) 8 . That individual driveway access permits be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. (T2 That all public roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifi- cations of the County Engineer. 13? Public Road Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section: Section Number 2 For Ponderosa Drive Minimum Paving width Collector Arterial Std: Section Number 2 For Cul -de -sac Street Minimum Paving width Local Access Std. � 14 � . That Ponderosa Drive be extended to the westerly plat boundary parallel with and adjacent to Lot 1, Block 2. That the plat sponsor shall set aside in an escrow account, Payable to Spokane County upon demand, the amount of $500.00 per lot for the ex- clusive purpose of helping to construct a railroad crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad in the vicinity of said plat. HEALTH CONDITIONS The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of ■ record and /or attached sheets as noted. V 2) Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the prelimin- ary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, County Engineer, and Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the fianl plat. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water supplier. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conform- ance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 5 No. PS- 1407 -81 ZS -40 -81 No. PS- 1407 -81 ZS -40 -81 5. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance . with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to appli- cation for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfac- torily complete the approved water system. 6 The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." 7. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health Officer prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. n 8.` Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 9'. The dedicatory language of the plat will state that: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, each lot is authorized the use of an individual on -site sewage system." No sewage system shall be allowed below the 2065 foot contour. 10. Water service must be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spo- kane County. r - , At Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health Services. UTILITY CONDITIONS c.. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution 1480 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authoriza- tion is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. \2> The owner, his heirs and successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. 4. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area - wide collection systems. 6 BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1 . Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water is re- quired. A plot plan showing water distribution and emergency vehicle access is required to be submitted for approval prior to any land develop- ment. G. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Robert Bethards for a preliminary plat and zone change, Valley Vista Estates, as described in the application, should be approved. Motion by: Carstens Seconded by: Williams No. PS- 1407 -81 ZS -40 -81 Vote: Unanimous to approve (3 -0) Additional Findings: That the Committee's desire of no piecemeal developments be considered by the present adjacent owner. ATTEST: By: WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning ector MA Y 2914', 98/ Date: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE hairperson STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 29, 1981 PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES ZS- 40 -81, UNCLASSIFIED TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R -1) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION I. 1 GENERAL INFORMATION A. Location The proposal is located in the Ponderosa area of the Spokane Valley, south of Ponderosa Drive extended and generally located east of Van Marter extended south approximately 450 feet. B. Proposal Project size is 10.88 acres subdivided into 12 lots for single family use. Lot frontage varies from 90 feet to 170 feet Lot size varies from 18,650 sq. ft. to 2 acres C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan The proposal is located in the Suburban Category of the Generalized Comprehen- sive Plan for Spokane County. The project is located within a transition area as the Urban Category is adjacent to the north of this proposal. The project appears to be consistent with the general purpose, detailed definition and general intent of the Comprehensive Plan Text. The project site lies within the boundaries of the Aquifer Sensitive Area and the General Sewer Service Area. In considering the above, the Planning Department would therefore recommend approval of this project subject to each dwelling unit being double plumbed for connection to future area -wide collection systems (Section 10.1.6, page 4 of Water Quality Chapter of the Generalized Comprehensive Plan for Spokane County). D Land Use Analysis: 1. Existing Land Uses Project site -- North -- The proposal is currently vacant with significant drainage ways and topography. This area exhibits scattered Pine trees generally located on the hilltops and side hill drainage draws. The major drainage course which runs northeast forms a grassy valley with gentle topography along its sides which creates a marshy area on either side of the drainage way. Is a drainage way and bench with single family development on the top of the drench and along the lesser slopes generally Myron Estates Development and two short plats are found in this area. Lot size in this area is largely a function of topography and drainage as lots on the flatter bench tops are 'generally smaller with steeper lots being larger (lot sizes vary from 10,000 sq. ft. to greater than two acres). - 1B - STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 29, 1981 VALLEY VISTA ESTATES - continued East -- II. SPECIAL INFORMATION 2 - 1C - Is generally vacant with significant topography and drain- age ways approximately 1 1 mile to the east is the Dishman/ Mica Road and the Railroad right -of -way which is adjacent to the west. South -- Is generally vacant with tree cover and topography within the Browne Mt. Ecocomplex which exhibits significant topography, drainage, timber and wildlife habitat. West -- Is much the same as property to the south with the Browne Mt. Ecocomplex and major drainage ways within the foot- hills of Browne Mt. and assocated peaks. General Area -- Has experienced significant growth and development within the past few years. Generally, this growth has occurred north of the major drainage way just to the north of the proposal as development procedes in this area significant physical restraints on this and adjacent properties will have to be addressed and mitigated. 2. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses The proposal is located within a separate geographical and somewhat separate planning topographical area. The areas lying directly south of the drainage channel is undeveloped timbered foothills of Browne's Mt. Ecocomplex. The proposal is a piece of this large separated island which has not developed, and therefore, residential densities have not yet been detrimental. This proposal may therefore establish the precedent for future developments. However, located to the north of the drainage channel are the Myron Estates Subdivisions which have developed into lots ranging from approximately 10,000 sq. ft. to two acres in size. A. Project Design The proposal recognizes topgraphic concerns in its design by creating larger lots on steeper slopes and smaller lots on more gentle topography. Ponderosa Drive is proposed to be extended and will be the only access for the proposal and surrounding property to the south, the proposal allows for further ex- tension of Ponderosa Drive. B. Circulation The County Road Engineer has examined the proposed preliminary plat and has recommended several conditions to provide for adequate roads to service this proposal and vicinity and are included as Conditions of Approval is granted. The major concern of the County Engineer's deals with providing access to this general area which will require a railroad crossing to provide adequate circu- lation in this area. C. Sewage Disposal This project lies within the Spokane Aquifer Sensitive Area and at the edge of the Spokane Aquifer. STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 29, 1981 VALLEY VISTA ESTATES - continued The project is inside the 201 Sewer Study Area Zone 3 and inside the Primary Sanitary Sewer Area recommended in the "208" Study. The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities pursuant to County Resolution 80 -0418 adopted March 24, 1980. The topography and soils in the area are generally suitable for use of individual on -site sewage systems. The lots are not of the proper dimensions to permit use of both individual wells and sewage systems. Surface soils are classed as Marble Sandy Lowland Spokane complex with 0 to 30% slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight to severe with possible contamination of groundwater. D. Water Supply It is within Critical Water Supply Service Area //3 and within the service area of Washington Water Power Company. Groundwater resources appear adequate to support development at this density. Geologically, the soils are glaciofluvial deposits. Data from wells in the immediate area was unavailable for review. The Washington Water Power Company has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the project upon completion of agreements with the proponent. The Washington Water Power Company advises the staff that adequate system capacity, and a desire on their part to serve, exists for the provision of water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. E. Drainage The project lies in a relatively sloping area south of 50th Avenue and east of Ponderosa Drive. Local drainage ways are significant. 3 Final construction plans should be reviewed and approved by both the County Engineer and Health District prior to the final plat filing. F. Fire Protection The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Fire District # /8. Recommended conditions if approved include a requirement for review and ap- proval by the Fire District prior to finalization of this proposal. G. Schools Proposal lies within the boundaries of Central Valley School District //356. H. Parks The report "Planning for Parks" (revised 1976) indicates that this proposal is outside of the study area. I. Unique Environmental Features The proposal is located adjacent to the Browne Mt. Ecocomplex which exhibits ecological and wildlife habitat, ecological botanical significance and geology which are of primary importance in this area with a relative ranking of llth in importance in the County. - 1D - STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 29, 1981 VALLEY VISTA ESTATES - continued 4 J. Cultural Resources III. ZONING ANALYSIS North -- None have been identified. The area is considered sensitive because of the proximity to intermittent drainage courses as a source of water. K. Agricultural Suitability The site contains 1 soil type: 1. (NcB), Marble Sandy Loam covering 100% of the site. Soil capability unit IVe -5 with slopes 0% to 8% and is considered as a soil type of Additional State -wide Importance for farmland. Project site -- Is currently zoned Unclassified with a Radio and Television Broadcasting District Overlay Zone. Within the Myron Estates Subdivisions. The zoning is predominately Single Family Zoning with some Agricultural Suburban and Agricultural Zoning. East -- Unclassified South -- Unclassified West -- Unclassified Compatibility -- The zone change as proposed is consistent with recent develop- ment to the north. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The sponsor has submitted an Environmental Checklist which has been reviewed by the Administrative Staff of the Spokane County Planning Department. After careful consideration by the Administrative Staff it is recommended that the Hearing Ex- aminer Committee should issue a declaration of significance and continue the Hear- ing until an Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared for this proposal and the 300± acres to the south. The Planning Department encourages comments con- cerning this position during the course of this Hearing in order to assist the Hearing Examiner Committee with this determination. The Administrative Staff arrived at this position as explained by the Memorandum from Thomas G. Mosher dated April 15, 1981, which is included by reference in this analysis and public hearing process. That should the Hearing Examiner Committee review the proposal as functionally related to the adjacent southerly areas, the signficant environmental impacts would be generally identified as those in WAC 197 -10 -440, earth, air, water, flora, fauna, noise, light and glare, natural resources, population, housing, transporta- tion, circulation, public services, energy, utilities, aesthetics, recreation, and archaeological /historical. STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 29, 1981 VALLEY VISTA ESTATES - continued The Staff has not circulated the Environmental Checklist due to the above evidence submitted to the Committee. If through the course of public testimony and public hearing the Hearing Examiner Committee decision is not to require an Environmental Impact Statement, the proposed declaration of non - significance would be issued by the Hearing Examiner Committee and any decision on the proposal would be continued until such time as the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with which would require circulation of the proposed declar- ation of non - significance for 15 days before any final declaration could be signed. V. CONDITIONS IF OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND EIS ARE REQUIRED • 1. That a final declaration of significance be issued by the Chairperson of the Hearing Examiner Committee with regards to the proposal as described by the applicant and as considered pursuant to WAC 197 -10 -060; and delineated in the April 15, 1981 Memorandum from Thomas G. Mosher which would include the 300± acres to the south generally south of Myron Estates Eighth Addition bounded by the railroad tracks to the east, steep terrain of Browne's Mt. to the west, and south. 2. That the Hearing shall be continued until an Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared. VI CONDITIONS IF OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND EIS ARE NOT REQUIRED 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 107-10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance is directed to be issued by the Hearing Ex- aminer Committee Chairperson; based upon the official file, written comments and /or public testimony containing information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the physical environment, a finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environ- ment are anticipated as a result of the project. 2. That the public hearing on this matter shall be continued to May 28 , 1981 at 900.A.M.Public Hearing Room, Second Floor, Broadway Centre Building, North 721 Jefferson Street. VII. CONDITIONS: If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. PLANNING CONDITIONS 1. That the plat be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and /or attached sheets as noted. 5 2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one dwelling unit be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. 3. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) - IF - STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 29, 1981 VALLEY VISTA ESTATES - continued 6 4. That appropriate street names be indicated. 5. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 6. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with, a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfac- torily complete the approved water system. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the sub- divider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. 7. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the filing of the final plat. 8. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolution #77 -1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements. 9. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 10. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non- significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the phusical environment; a finding is hereby made that no potentially signifi- cant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of this project; and a final declaration of non - significance is hereby to be issued. 11. There will be no phasing of the project, and the plat will be finalized in its entirety unless approved by the Subdivision Administrator. - 16 - tr STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 29, 1981 VALLEY VISTA ESTATES - continued 12. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to June 1, 1983, a time extension public hearing before the Hearing Examiner Committee may be required after one year if new conditions are recommended because of an admin- istrative review by agencies of jurisdiction. The project sponsor is respon- sible for requesting an Extension of Time prior to June 1, 1983. 13. That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning shall be changed to Single Family Residential (R -1). ENGINEER CONDITIONS 1. That the proposed plat is subject to the provisions of Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution #80 -1592 as amended. c/2. That conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer is given subject to dedication of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. V3. That plans, profiles, and cross- sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. i That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage j facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to con- struction and /or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. L Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be per- formed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been re- placed. L6. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right -of -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. -7. All construction within the existing or proposed public right -of -way is to be completed prior to filing plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. Y8. That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. Road design, construction, and drainage control for half right -of -ways and stub road connections are the responsibility of the Developer. X10. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded. A 1 foot strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de 'sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) - 1H - STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 29, 1981 VALLEY VISTA ESTATES - continued 8 v11. That individual driveway access permits be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. X12. That all public roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifi- cations of the County Engineer. .A3. Public Road Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section: Section Number 2 For Ponderosa Drive Minimum Paving width Collector Arterial Std. Section Number 2 For Cul -de -sac Street Minimum Paving width Local Access Std. 14. That Ponderosa Drive be extended to the westerly plat boundary parallel with and adjacent to Lot 1, Block 2. 15. That the plat sponsor shall set aside in an escrow account, Payable to Spokane County upon demand, the amount of $500.00 per lot for the exclusive purpose of helping to construct a railroad crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad in the vicinity of said plat. HEALTH CONDITIONS 1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and /or attached sheets as noted. 2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, County Engineer, and Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the fianl plat. 3. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 4. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water supplier. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appro- priate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 5. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 29, 1981 VALLEY VISTA ESTATES - continued 6. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the sub- divider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." 7. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health Officer prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. 8. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 9. The dedicatory language of the plat will state that: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, each lot is authorized the use of an individual on -site sewage system." No sewage system shall be allowed below the 2065 foot contour. 10. Water service must be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 11. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health Services. UTILITY CONDITIONS 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution 1180 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The owner, his heirs and successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. 4. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area -wide collection systems. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water is required. A plot plan showing water distribution and emergency vehicle access is required to be submitted for approval prior to any land development. 9 - 13 - AGENDA, MAW. 28, 1981 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Thursday, May 28, 1981 - 9:00 A.M.(Item #1 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION (CONTINUATION) PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES ZS- 40 -81, UNCLASSIFIED TO SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R -1) a. Location: Located south of that area generally known as the Ponderosa and west of Painted Hills development area. It is adjacent to and south of the Myron Estates No. 8 Subdivision and approximately 1/4 mile west of the intersection of Mohawk Drive and the Dishman Mica Road. b. Legal Description: Section 4, Township 24N, Range 44 EWM Being a legal description of a portion of Government Lot 9, Section 4, County of Spokane, State of Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the NW corner of Lot 9, th. E 1330 ft. along the N line of Lot 9, to the west line of Ponderosa Drive as monumented in Myron 8 Estates, also being the true point of beginning of this legal description, th. S 34 °W 530 ft. to a point of curvature, th. SWIy 324.98 ft. along a curve to the right to a point of tangency; th. S 82 °W 430 ft. to an angle point; th. S 8 °E 60 ft. to an angle point; th. S 82 °W 170 ft. to an angle point; th. S 16 °E 260 ft. to an angle point; th. S 3 °W 325 ft. to an angle point; th. E 265 ft. to an angle point; th. N 21 °E 285 ft. to an angle point; th. 5 68 °E 20 ft. to an angle point; th. N 30 °E 265 ft. to an angle point; th. N 87° E 515 ft. to an angle point; th. N 37 °E 175 ft. to an angle point; th. N 18 °E 75ft. to an angle point; th. N 60 ° W 320 ft. to an angle point; th. N 34 °E 480 ft. to the north line of Lot 9; th. W 72ft. along the N line of Lot 9 to the true point of beginning, containing 11 acres more or less. c. Sponsor: Robert Bethards P.O. Box 2704, T.A. Spokane, WA. 99220 d. Surveyor: Billy J. Tucker E 12721 Sprague Spokan,e WA. 99216 e. Site Size: 11 acres f. Number of Lots: 12 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Unclassified i. Proposed Zoning: R -1 j. Water Source: Washington Water Power Co. k. School District: Central Valley #356 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Septic tanks m. Environmental Impact: Regarding the State Environmental Policy Act, this proposal has been examined by the Planning Department staff. Pursuant to WAC 197 -10 -040 (29) and 197 -10 -060, the staff has determined that all of the land to the south, bounded by the railroad and the terrain features of Brown's Mountain, is functionally related to the present proposal. When reviewing the direct and indirect impacts of the total proposal, it is the staff's position that a declaration of significance should be issued and an Environmental Impact Statement prepared. However, a final decision can only be made after consideration of testimony and reports associated with the scheduled public hearing. n. Reason for Continuation: Proposal was continued to May 28, 1981 at 9:00 A.M. to allow staff an opportunity to circulate the Environmental Checklist to agencies of jurisdiction. - 1 - Mr. Ralph Guthrie South 414 University Spokane, Washington 99206 Dear Mr. Guthrie: • OF 1-'1OB OF COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER STassr.'%rn ,'%ttsnaaroTroar 992111 April 18, 1977 RE: PE 1054 -76 Myron Estates #8 One of the requirements set forth by the Spokane County Planning Commission in consideration of the preliminary plat of Myron Estates #k8, involved the construction of a new crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad, located in the immediate vicinity of the preliminary plat proposal. The requirement was contained in the Planning Commission Minutes of November 19, 1976, as Condition Number 12, (copy attached). Negotiations between representives of the County and your representives have been held and it has been agreed that the extent of your obligation in cost sharing for the improvement of the new crossing and connection road would be $15,000. The negotiations and resulting $15,000 cost sharing figure did consider the amount or ev hares propose• in yr. a es ,i e a ve a remaining be se� evelopable area which would by the new crossing and the presently developed area of the Myron Estates, which would also use the new crossing. Generally speaking, the County's share would be for the presently developed area and the connection from the tracks out to the Dishman -Mica Road, with the remaining cost of the crossing improvement prorated and shared between the Myron Estates #8 proposal and future developments, located within the area served by the new crossing. Since it most likely will take sometime to deal with both the Union Pacific Rail- road and the Washington State Utilities and Transportation Commission in regards to the actual approval, location, and construction of the crossing, we would recommend bonding for this condition by a savings account assignment established by your bank specifically for this purpose. A savings account assignment form is attached for your use. The assignment form properly executed by your bank and returned to this office will be required prior to the filing of the final plat for Myron Estates #8. If you have any questions or need additional information, please advise. Very truly yours, Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer 4 ,.; t 1. Gary W. Kennaly, P.E. Planning & Traffic Engineer Mr. Ralph Guthrie South 414 University Spokane, Washington 99208 Dear Mr. Guthrie: mm OY NICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER S0JroIIt.LnnE , ti.'lIIENC'rUx 99201 April 18• 1977 RE: PE 1054 -76 Myron Estates #8 One of the requirements set forth by the Spokane County Planning Commission in consideration of the preliminary plat of Myron Estates ?8, involved the construction of a new crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad, located in the immediate vicinity of the preliminary plat proposal. The requirement was contained in the Planning Commission Minutes of November 19, 1976, as Condition Number 12, (copy attached). Negotiations between representives of the County and your representives have been held and it has been agreed that the extent of your obligation in cost sharing for the improvement of the new crossing and connection road would be $15,000. The negotiations and resulting $15,000 cost sharing figure did consider the amount of developable area proposed in Myron Estates #8 relative to both the remaining developable area which would be served by the new crossing and the presently developed area of the Myron Estates, which would also use the new crossing. Generally speaking, the County's share would be for the presently developed area and the connection from the tracks out to the Dishman -Mica Road, with the remaining cost of the crossing improvement prorated and shared between the Myron Estates #8 proposal and future developments, located within the area served by the new crossing. Since it most likely will take sometime to deal with both the Union Pacific Rail- road and the Washington State Utilities and Transportation Commission in regards to the actual approval, location, and construction of the crossing, we would recommend bonding for this condition by a savings account assignment established by your bank specifically for this purpose. A savings account assignment form is attached for your use. The assignment form properly executed by your bank and returned to this office will be required prior to the filing of the final plat for Myron Estates #8. If you have any questions or need additional information, please advise. Very truly yours, Robert S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer Q /4. , .3 1c.. Gary W. Kennaly, P.E. Planning & Traffic Engineer OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date Inn/ /3 Inter - office Communication To Sttu C. 4 \o (, \t>ic.cCSki YIc C(MI.u. From I i c t%.1,4 h i —7z4 p Ji ' s ii . Subject P S / 4 /i ) 7 c L ' 2 7 / / t - 7 £'2 �Si47 S. C'oAT r7te 7i At trn6 C owtiC1 yJ &w,c eea2- As No Nfc Co /VC /560"CS Form 327 -C.R_ hie.? rip • ro 4dg Form 327-CR. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Inter - office Communication To Stave. N YIcct 'AA,VO: 1. Fro o Y @a-Nn 2 /.4 t -IN S. i OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER Date 71/4/ / 3 , 19_42/ Subject P 5 / «0 7 VAI //s y V/ 1T4 AESt47&S. CoA/77/nen T ione /Veda/2/ri • To Ac%g Te.G Co t.,,,CX Ce-n 't e eaz. h AS No Ale et) C•o AV C\ ; g time . Location: Proposal: Action: Reason: 7. / PS- 1407 -81 ZS -40 -81 Location: Proposal: Action: Reason: Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee Actions (Contd.) 3. PE- 1275 -78, Bridal Trail Meadows - Time Extension - Wallace ZE- 11 -79, Unclassified & Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban Location: In the Spokane Valley, approximately 1/2 mile south of Moffatt Road, 1/4 mile east of Newman Lake Road and 1/8 mile northwest of Trent Avenue 24 -26 -45 Proposal: 68 acres into 55 lots for single family dwellings Action: Approval - Unanimous Additional Conditions: As per Findings and Order 4. PE- 1294 -79, Vercler Road Professional Park - Time Extension - Wolff ZE- 77 -79, Agricultural Suburban to Residential Office Location: In the Opportunity area of the Spokane Valley adjacent to and east of Vercler Road approximately 650 ft. south of Mission Ave. 15 -25 -44 Proposal: 2.4 acres into 4 lots for residential office use Action: Approval - Unanimous Additional Conditions: As per Findings and Order 5. PE- 1295A -79, Moen 3rd Addition to Greenacres - Time Extension - Schultz ZE- 75 -79, Agricultural to Agricultural & Agricultural Suburban to R -1 Location: In the Greenacres area of the Spokane Valley at the NW corner of 4th Avenue and Greenacres Road 19 -25 -45 Proposal: 2.9 acres into 8 lots for single family dwellings Action: Approval - Unanimous Additional Conditions: As per Findings and Order 6. PE- 1406 -81, Johnstone Addition - Redlin ZE- 32 -81, Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban In the Ponderosa area on the south wall of the Spokane Valley specifically it is south of 44th Avenue, north of and adjacent to Holman Road approximately 600 feet and west of Farr Road 4 acres into 5 lots for single family dwellings 2 - 1 To deny without prejudice That the project with its proposed density is inconsistent with existing developments of the Ponderosa areas. The Committee directs the sponsor to redesign the project with no more than four (4) lots in a manner which would create compatible lot sizes with the area. Valley Vista Estates - Bethards Unclassified to R -1 South of that area generally known as the Ponderosa and west of Painted Hills development area; adjacent to and south of the Myron Estates No. 8 Subdivision and approximately 1/4 mile west of the intersection of Mohawk Drive and Dishman Mica Road 4 -24 -44 11 acres into 12 lots for single family dwellings To continue - Unanimous (Hearing of May 28, 1981 - 9:00 A.M.) SEPA Checklist has to be circulated to agencies of jurisdiction so that a decision regarding the need of an EIS can be made. -2- A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on April 29, 1981 and the members of the Committee present being Kenneth Kennedy, Chairperson, Kathy Carstens and Jerry Williams. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Robert Bethards, is requesting approval of a preliminary plat and zone change, PS- 1407 -81, Valley Vista Estates and ZS- 40 -81, Unclassified to Single Family Residential (R-1) for subdivision of 11 acres into 12 lots for single family dwellings and there being present, the following applicant or representative: C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Hearing Examiner Committee' continued the decision of this proposal until the SEPA Checklist has been circulated to agencies of jurisdiction so that a decision regarding the need of an EIS can be made. - D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTIGENCIES APPLICABLE. TO THIS SUBDIVISION APPROVAL: 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 107 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental. Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance is directed to be issued by the Hearing Examiner . Committee Chairperson; based upon the official file, written comments and /or public testimony containing information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the physical environment, a finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of the project. 2. That the public hearing on this matter shall be continued to May 28, 1981 at 9:00 A.M. Public Hearing Room, Second Floor, Broadway Centre Build- ing, North 721 Jefferson Street. E. ORDER SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER BOB BETHARDS - STAN SCHULTZ 1 The No. PS- 1407 -81 ZS-40 -81 The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Robert Bethards for a preliminary plat and zone change Valley Vista Estates as described in the application should bt? continued to May 28, 1981 at 9:00 A.M. or as soon therafter as possible. Motion by: Williams Seconded by: Carstens Vote: Unanimously to Continue the application to May 28, 1981 at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible (3 -0) ATTEST: WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Director By: Date: 9 X78/ HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE vile No. PS- 1407 -81 ZS -40 -81 Chairpersop AGENDA, April 29, 1981 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: PLACE: Wednesday, April 29, 1981 - 9:00 A.M.(Item #4 on Morning Agenda) Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES ZS- 40 -81, UNCLASSIFIED TO SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R -1) a. Location: Located south of that area generally known as the Ponderosa and west of Painted Hills development area. It is adjacent to and south of the Myron Estates No. 8 Subdivision and approximately 1/4 mile west of the intersection of Mohawk Drive and the Dishman Mica Road. b. Legal Description: Section 4, Township 24N, Range 44 EWM Being a legal description of a portion of Government Lot 9, Section 4, County of Spokane, State of Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the NW corner of Lot 9, th. E 1330 ft. along the N line of Lot 9, to the west line of Ponderosa Drive as monumented in Myron 8 Estates, also being the true point of beginning of this legal description, th. S 34 °W 530 ft. to a point of curvature, th. SWIy 324.98 ft. along a curve to the right to a point of tangency; th. S 82 °W 430 ft. to an angle point; th. 5 8 °E 60 ft. to an angle point; th. S 82 °W 170 ft. to an angle point; th. S 16 °E 260 ft. to an angle point; th. S 3 °W 325 ft. to an angle point; th. E 265 ft. to an angle point; th. N 21 °E 285 ft. to an angle point; th. S 68 °E 20 ft. to an angle point; th. N 30 °E 265 ft. to an angle point; th. N 87° E 515 ft. to an angle point; th. N 37 °E 175 ft. to an angle point; th. N 18 °E 75ft. to an angle point; th. N 60 °W 320 ft. to an angle point; th. N 34 °E 480 ft. to the north line of Lot 9; th. W 72ft. along the N line of Lot 9 to the true point of beginning, containing 11 acres more or less. c Sponsor: Robert Bethards P.O. Box 2704, T.A. Spokane, WA. 99220 d. Surveyor: Billy J. Tucker E 12721 Sprague Spokan,e WA. 99216 e. Site Size: 11 acres f. Number of Lots: 12 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Unclassified i. Proposed Zoning: R -1 j. Water Source: Washington Water Power Co. k. School District: Central Valley #356 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Septic tanks m. Environmental Impact: Regarding the State Environmental Policy Act, this proposal has been examined by the Planning Department staff. Pursuant to WAC 197 -10 -040 (29) and 197 -10 -060, the staff has determined that all of the land to the south, bounded by the railroad and the terrain features of Brown's Mountain, is functionally related to the present proposal. When reviewing the direct and indirect impacts of the total proposal, it is the staff's position that a declaration of significance should be issued and an Environmental Impact Statement prepared. However, a final decision can only be made after consideration of testimony and reports associated with the scheduled public hearing. - 7 - CC s 'nETH AVE k-„ 5 E c. '7 4 1 P0 A op 4.3 RO cr. PO/VOL ACRES • ADD. 4 8TH AVE, n .1\ ROA D n "Z O sir AVE 0 try Lij12 o•-■ e cc r MION IMINI . _ ' I ; 2.- 1 • -1/ (-) 1 CC se 8 7, - ( t:fl "1 it .‘- e • >- 0 FERRET I r 3 s 0 BR. No 4-519 .CHEST ER 1 SCHOOL' — ; Ct:IESTETz CEs3 45 th en si 'CO 0, 0 TS e roe / t 4 0- t CDC 4.7 T. R • 4 z\i I PE HALLETT - 57 1 f‘• , 44TH • a •••••••••• P. STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 29, 1981 PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES ZS- 40- 81, UNCLASSIFIED TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R -1) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Location The proposal is located in the. Ponderosa area of the Spokane Valley, south of Ponderosa Drive extended and generally located east of Van Marter extended south approximately 450 feet. 1 B. Proposal Project size is 10.88 acres subdivided into 12 lots for single family use. Lot frontage varies from 90 feet to 170 feet Lot size varies from 18,650 sq. ft. to 2 acres C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan The proposal is located in the Suburban Category of the Generalized Comprehen- sive Plan for Spokane County. The project is located within a transition area as the Urban Category is adjacent to the north of this proposal. The project appears to be consistent with the general purpose, detailed definition and general intent of the Comprehensive Plan Text. The project site lies within the boundaries of the Aquifer Sensitive Area and the General Sewer Service Area. In considering the above approval of this project for connection to future of Water Quality Chapter County). D. Land Use Analysis: 1. Existing Land Uses Project site -- North -- , the Planning Department would therefore recommend subject to each dwelling unit being double plumbed area -wide collection systems (Section 10.1.6, page 4 of the Generalized Comprehensive Plan for Spokane The proposal is currently vacant with significant drainage ways and topography. This area exhibits scattered Pine trees generally located on the hilltops and side hill drainage draws. The major drainage course which runs northeast forms a grassy valley with gentle topography along its sides which creates a marshy area on either side of the drainage way. Is a drainage way and bench with single family development on the top of the drench and along the lesser slopes generally Myron Estates Development and two short plats are found in this area. Lot size in this area is largely a function of topography and drainage as lots on the flatter bench tops are generally smaller with steeper lots being larger (lot sizes vary from 10,000 sq. ft. to greater than two acres). - 7B - STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL <„ 1981 Vt.___EY VISTA ESTATES - continued East -- South -- Is generally vacant with tree cover and topography within the Browne Mt. Ecocomplex which exhibits significant topography, drainage, timber and wildlife habitat. West -- Is much the same as property to the south with the Browne Mt. Ecocomplex and major drainage ways within the foot- hills of Browne Mt. and assocated peaks.. General Area -- Has experienced significant growth and development within the past few years. Generally, this growth has occurred north of the major drainage way just to the north of the proposal as development procedes in this area significant physical restraints on this and adjacent properties will have to be addressed and mitigated. 2. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses The proposal is located within a separate geographical and somewhat separate planning topographical area. The areas lying directly south of the drainage channel is undeveloped timbered foothills of Browne's Mt. Ecocomplex. The proposal is a piece of this large separated island which has not developed, and therefore, residential densities have not yet been detrimental. This proposal may therefore establish the precedent for future developments. However, located to the north of the drainage channel are the Myron Estates Subdivisions which have developed into lots ranging from approximately 10,000 sq. ft. to two acres in size. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION 2 - 7C - Is generally vacant with significant topography and drain- age ways approximately mile to the east is the Dishman/ Mica Road and the Railroad right -of -way which is adjacent to the west. A. Project Design The proposal recognizes topgraphic concerns in its design by creating larger lots on steeper slopes and smaller lots on more gentle topography. Ponderosa Drive is proposed to be extended and will be the only access for the proposal and surrounding property to the south, the proposal allows for further ex- tension of Ponderosa Drive. B. Circulation The County Road Engineer has examined the proposed preliminary plat and has recommended several conditions to provide for adequate roads to service this proposal and vicinity and are included as Conditions of Approval is granted. The major concern of the County Engineer's deals with providing access to this general area which will require a railroad crossing to provide adequate circu- lation in this area. C. Sewage Disposal This project lies within the Spokane Aquifer Sensitive Area and at the edge of the Spokane Aquifer. STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 29, 1981 VALLEY VISTA ESTATES - continued 3 The project is inside the 201 Sewer Study Area Zone 3 and inside the Primary Sanitary Sewer Area recommended in the "208" Study. The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities pursuant to County Resolution 80 -0418 adopted March 24, 1980. The topography and soils in the area are generally suitable for use of individual on -site sewage systems. The lots are not of the proper dimensions to permit use of both individual wells and sewage systems. Surface soils are classed as Marble Sandy Loam and Spokane complex with 0 to 30% slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight to severe with possible contamination of groundwater. D. Water Supply It is within Critical Water Supply Service Area 03 and within the service area of Washington Water Power Company. Groundwater resources appear adequate to support development at this density. Geologically, the soils are glaciofluvial deposits. Data from wells in the immediate area was unavailable for review. The Washington Water Power Company has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the project upon completion of agreements with the proponent. The Washington Water Power Company advises the staff that adequate system capacity, and a desire on their part to serve, exists for the provision of water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. E. Drainage The project lies in a relatively sloping area south of 50th Avenue and east of Ponderosa Drive. Local drainage ways are significant. Final construction plans should be reviewed and approved by both the County Engineer and Health District prior to the final plat filing. F. Fire Protection The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Fire District 718. Recommended conditions if approved include a requirement for review and ap- proval by the Fire District prior to finalization of this proposal. G. Schools Proposal lies within the boundaries of Central Valley School District 0356. H. Parks The report "Planning for Parks" (revised 1976) indicates that this proposal is outside of the study area. I. Unique Environmental Features The proposal is located adjacent to the Browne Mt. Ecocomplex which exhibits ecological and wildlife habitat, ecological botanical significance and geology which are of primary importance in this area with a relative ranking of llth in importance in the County. - 7D - STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 2 ;, 1981 VA..-EY VISTA ESTATES - continued J. Cultural Resources K. Agricultural Suitability None have been identified. The area is considered sensitive because of the proximity to intermittent drainage courses as a source of water. III. ZONING ANALYSIS North -- The site contains 1 soil type: 1. , Marble Sandy Loam covering 100% of the site. Soil capability unit with slopes 0% to 8% and is considered as a soil type of Additional State -wide Importance for farmland. Project site -- Is currently zoned Unclassified with a Radio and Television Broadcasting District Overlay Zone. Within the Myron Estates Subdivisions. The zoning is predominately Single Family Zoning with some Agricultural Suburban and Agricultural Zoning. East -- Unclassified South -- Unclassified West -- Unclassified Compatibility -- The zone change as proposed is consistent with recent develop- ment to the north. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 4 The sponsor has submitted an Environmental Checklist which has been reviewed by the Administrative Staff of the Spokane County Planning Department. After careful consideration by the Administrative Staff it is recommended that the Hearing Ex- aminer Committee should issue a declaration of significance and continue the Hear- ing until an Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared for this proposal and the 300± acres to the south. The Planning Department encourages comments con- cerning this position during the course of this Hearing in order to assist the Hearing Examiner Committee with this determination. The Administrative Staff arrived at this position as explained by the Memorandum from Thomas G. Mosher dated April 15, 1981, which is included by reference in this analysis and public hearing process. That should the Hearing Examiner Committee review the proposal as functionally related to the adjacent southerly areas, the signficant environmental impacts would be generally identified as those in WAC 197 -10 -440, earth, air, water, flora, fauna, noise, light and glare, natural resources, population, housing, transporta- tion, circulation, public services, energy, utilities, aesthetics, recreation, and archaeological /historical. - 7E - STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 2 , 1981 VALLEY VISTA ESTATES - continued The Staff has not circulated the Environmental Checklist due to the above evidence submitted to the Committee. If through the course of. public testimony and public hearing the Hearing Examiner Committee decision is not to require an Environmental Impact Statement, the proposed declaration of non - significance would be issued by the Hearing Examiner Committee and any decision on the proposal would be continued until such time as the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with which would require circulation of the proposed declar- ation of non - significance for 15 days before any final declaration could be signed. V. CONDITIONS IF OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND EIS ARE REQUIRED 1. That a final declaration of significance be issued by the Chairperson of the Hearing Examiner Committee with regards to the proposal as described by the applicant and as considered pursuant to WAC 197 -10 -060; and delineated in the April 15, 1981 Memorandum from Thomas G. Mosher which would include the 300± acres to the south generally south of Myron Estates Eighth Addition bounded by the railroad tracks to the east, steep terrain of Browne's Mt. to the west, and south. 2. That the Hearing shall be continued until an Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared. VI. CONDITIONS IF OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND EIS ARE NOT REQUIRED 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 107-10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance is directed to be issued by the Hearing Ex- aminer Committee Chairperson; based upon the official file, written comments and /or public testimony containing information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the physical environment, a finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environ- ment are anticipated as a result of the project. 2. That the public hearing on this matter shall be continued to May , 1981 at Public Hearing Room, Second Floor, Broadway Centre Building, North 721 Jefferson Street. VII. CONDITIONS: If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. PLANNING CONDITIONS 5 1. That the plat be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and /or attached sheets as noted. 2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one dwelling unit be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. 3. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) - 7F - STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 1981 V, LY VISTA ESTATES - continued 6 4. That appropriate street names be indicated. 5. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 6. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfac- torily complete the approved water system. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the sub- divider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. 7. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the filing of the final plat. 8. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.OS0 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolution //77 -1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of.final disposition of this application, and prior to any on -site improvements. 9. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. - 7G - 10. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 197 -10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non - significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and /or public testimony contain information regarding assessment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the phusical environment; a finding is hereby made that no potentially signifi- cant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of this project; and a final declaration of non- significance is hereby to be issued. 11. There will be no phasing of the project, and the plat will be finalized in its entirety unless approved by the Subdivision Administrator. STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 2,, 1981 VALLEY VISTA ESTATES - continued 7 12. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to June 1, 1983, a time extension public hearing before the Hearing Examiner Committee may be required after one year if new conditions are recommended because of an admin- istrative review by agencies of jurisdiction. The project sponsor is respon- sible for requesting an Extension of Time prior to June 1, 1983. 13. That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning shall be changed to Single Family Residential (R -1). ENGINEER CONDITIONS 1. That the proposed plat is subject to the provisions of Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution #80 -1592 as amended. 2. That conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer is given subject to dedication of right -of -way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 3. That plans, profiles, and cross - sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to con- struction and /or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 5. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be per- formed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been re- placed. 6. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right -of -way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 7. All construction within the existing or proposed public right -of -way is to be completed prior to filing plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 8. That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. 9. Road design, construction, and drainage control for half right -of -ways and stub road connections are the responsibility of the Developer. 10. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded. A 1 foot strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de 'sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) - 7H - STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 29, 1981 VALLEY VISTA ESTATES - continued 8 11. That individual driveway access permits be required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. 12. That all public roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifi- cations of the County Engineer. 13. Public Road Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section: Section Number 2 For Ponderosa Drive Minimum Paving width Collector Arterial Std. Section Number 2 For Cul -de -sac Street Minimum Paving width Local Access Std. 14. That Ponderosa Drive be extended to the westerly plat boundary parallel with and adjacent to Lot 1, Block 2. 15. That the plat sponsor shall set aside in an escrow account, Payable to Spokane County upon demand, the amount of $500.00 per lot for the exclusive purpose of helping to construct a railroad crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad in the vicinity of said plat. HEALTH CONDITIONS 1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or attached sheets as noted. 2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, County Engineer, and Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the fianl plat. 3. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 4. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water supplier. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appro- priate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 5. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. - 7 I - STAFF ANALYSIS - APRIL 2y, 1981 VAIIEY VISTA ESTATES - continued 6. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the sub- divider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." 7. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health Officer prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. 8. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 9. The dedicatory language of the plat will state that: "Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, each lot is authorized the use of an individual on -site sewage system." No sewage system shall be allowed below the 2065 foot contour. • 10. Water service must be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 11. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health Services. UTILITY CONDITIONS 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution 0/80 -0418, the use of on -site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The owner,• his heirs and successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. 4. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area -wide collection systems. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water is required. A plot plan showing water distribution and emergency vehicle access is required to be submitted for approval prior to any land development. 9 - 7J - Moto W:� \:wvnS — 01 C Soup.. lW ;v. `vA 5f ern 86 Th ese 12_ pArcce IS ® T.Ctev. cl s ovA t To d v e\ o ? ® Orpossc! To E.r. S. CD Discussed Pied Des ;9 L � 0 f►ea -e- 15 oThe2 lJ ? jer d 4 oewe To ? o ;cQ PR�t u Cc i �7 A CC 5 Age.,,, 4 Cn cc -rejh C7a 0 bRAUocti cS I;;LICONcie i toSet-Q_ �o Cu Tin rz le JrOP " tPavrdeye,as2 9r iSoo / 1\1:ak o cse d \o .t \ 4 o(Q w A I k d o es rclr Le v os & } e. a t,,_CX c---u1 b . Sro,. Sch.kJTz.. _ Rer, 3EThfa S - Ma t'kEeC arc. 6TS j to 1Z tcQE5 m 4 8a k.artcts 's I,)OT ZC- 647t c. To attnal E C am- l Pt U'L 5 t4sTE. s Tht-t Su6LLhbar, De Ks ttcj : s Flppr-op r1 cc E X02 Sit & - a.. of ct df A CSn s ∎ . 1 ) e clea-cacCTlo n) o 4 l4.crn , , , , . urkrTi % c.c.ct. tome As tr L. ;sr i 5 elrcctiec.ie d de Lill ovn co i LL Ioe. RCs'deite_l- bAs t.\vcry' 1;4 c • on c6,ec_. Li sr' to \next 2t rced � effed t tfre- &u 1a1 e . TO: 11 1981 PLANNING DEP RTMERIR ..�' BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 72� ON STRE PHONE 0 55 -2205 SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99260 M E M O R A N D U M SUBJECT: Recommendation for a DATE: April 15, 1981 Declaration of Significance and EIS for Valley Vista Estates; PS- 1407 -81 and ZS -40 -81 Robert J. Bethards FROM: Thoma Mosher, AICP Planning Commission Administr , Special Programs Members WA State Dept of Ecology WA State Dept of Social & Health Services Fire District #8 Washington Water Power Engineers Department Utilities Department After careful consideration by the administrative staff, it is our position that the Hearing Examiner Committee should issue a declaration of significance and continue the hearing until an Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared for this proposal and the ±300 acres to the south. The Planning Department Staff encourages comments concerning this position, in hopes that the Hearing Examiner Committee can benefit from additional information. The Staff arrived at this position as a result of the following reasoning 'and application of the various referenced portions of Lhe SEPA Guidelines, Chapter 197 -10 WAC. The Planning Deparment Stair has historically had numerous contacts from persons interested in developing this site and /or the approximately 300 acres south of Myron Estates Eighth Addition bounded by the railroad tracks /berm on the east, steep terrain of Brown's Mountain to the west and south, and Ponderosa area development to the north. Experience with this and in the past has led the Staff to conclude that this larger acreage, of which the current proposal is approximately eleven acres, is (1) virtually inaccessible (2) ecologically sensitive and (3) in need of a single site planning solution (really not unlike past concepts, one of which is on file with the County Engineer). WAC 197 -10- 040(29) and WAC 197 -10 -060 address what constitutes a pro- posal and what the scope of the proposal is from the standpoint of the thresh- old determination (EIS decision). The regulations, attached hereto, essentially require the County to consider the scope of the proposal to be as extensive as may be necessary in light of "... future activities (which) are functionally related to the present proposal." Critical in this "scope-of- proposal" concept, is (1) whether this proposal "... facilitates or is a necessary prerequisite to future activities" (2) whether an indirect impact may be "... growth induced by the proposal, ..." and (3) whether "... the present action will serve as a precedent for future actions." Regarding number one above, the Staff perceives the access roadway to be provided with this project to be the only practical access to the large southerly acreage, and hence is functionally related as a prerequisite for future activity. With respect to number two above, the Staff has historically felt that an indirect impact of the first proposal south of Myron Estates Eighth Addition will be the first of numerous uncoordinated and piecemeal development of a land- lock, ecologically sensitive area. In this regard, the Staff looks at this project as growth inducing and functionally related. Finally, number three above is related to number two, in that, any approval of the present project will very likely be a precedent to piecemeal further similar small acreage developments to the south. In light of the above, the Staff views the "total" proposal as a series of related impacts on a large ecologically sensitive area. This large area has several direct and indirect unique aspects, which strongly suggest there could be substantial adverse impacts to the physical environment. IT IS THEREFORE THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF THAT AN OVERALL DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT FOR THE SOUTHERLY ±300 ACRES BE DEVELOPED. THE COUNTY COULD THEN MAKE A THRESHOLD DETERMINATION REGARDING THE TOTAL PROPOSAL. Attachment 1. 197 -10 -040 I IMMee . Proposal means a specific request to undertake any activity submitted to, and seriously considered by, an agency or a decision -maker within an agency, as well as any action or activity which may result from approval of any such request. The scope of a proposal for the purposes of lead agency determination, the threshold de- termination, and impact statement preparation is further defined in WAC 197 -10 -060. (30) Responsible official means that officer or offi- cers, committee, department or section of the lead agen- cy designated by the lead agency's guidelines to undertake its responsibilities as lead agency [See WAC 197 -10 -820]. (31) SEPA means the state environmental policy act of 1971, chapter 43.21C RCW, as amended. (32) State agency means any state board, commission or department, except those in the legislative or judicial branches. The term includes the office of the governor and the various divisions thereof, state universities, col- leges and community colleges. • (33) Threshold determination means the decision by a lead agency whether or not an environmental impact statement is required for a proposal. [Order DE 77 -24, § 197 -10 -040, filed 12/22/77; Order 75 -1, § 197 -10- 040, filed 12/17/75.] WAC 197 -10 -050 Use of the environmental check- list form. A form is provided in WAC 197 -10 -365 for an environmental checklist to be initially completed by an action proponent, whether public or private. This may be done either alone or together with the lead agency, but is usually done in conjunction with a license appli- cation. This form must be used in the threshold deter- mination; it will also be helpful in making the lead agency designation and in predraft consultation. Howev- er, where there is an agreement between the proponent and the lead agency that an EIS is required, the com- pletion of the environmental checklist is unnecessary. [Order DE 77 -24, § 197 -10 -050, filed 12/22/77; Order 75 -I, § 197 -10 -050, filed 12/17/75.] WAC 197 -10 -055 Timing of the EIS process. (I) The primary purpose of the EIS process is to provide environmental information to governmental decision - makers to be considered prior to making their decision. The process should thus be completed before the deci- sions of an agency commit it to a particular course of action. The actual decision to proceed with many actions may involve a series of individual approvals or decisions. The threshold determination and the EIS, if required, should ideally be completed at the beginning of this pro- cess. In many cases, however, preliminary decisions must be made upon a proposal before the proposal is suffi- ciently definite to permit meaningful environmental analysis. All agencies shall identify the times at which the EIS process must be completed either in their guide- lines or on a case by case basis. The lead agency should require completion of the threshold determination and EIS, if required, at the earliest point in the planning and decision - making process when the principal features of a [Ch. 197 - 10 WAC — p 41 Environmental Policy act proposal and its impacts upon the environment can be reliably identified. (2) At a minimum,•the threshold determination and any required EIS shall be completed prior to undertak- ing any proposed major action. (3) The maximum time limits contained in these guidelines for the threshold determination and EIS pro- cess do not apply to a proposal for a governmental action when the proponent of the action is also the lead agency. [Order DE 77 -24, § 197 -10 -055, filed 12/22/77; Order 75 -1, § 197 -10 -055, filed 12/17/75.] WAC Ara Scope of a proposal and its im- pacts or t e purposes of lead agency determination, threshold determination, and EIS preparation. (I) The proposal considered by an acting agency during the lead agency determination procedure, and by the lead agency during the threshold determination and EIS preparation. shall be the total proposal including its direct and indi- rect impacts. Whenever the word "proposal" or the term "proposed action" is used in this chapter, the discussion in subsection (2) of this section applies. In considering the environmental impacts of a proposal during the threshold determination and EIS preparation, the dis- cussion in subsection (3) of this section applies. (2) The total proposal is the proposed action, together with all proposed activity functionally related to it. Fu- ture activities are functionally related to the present proposal if: (a) The future activity is an expansion of the present . proposal, facilitates or is necessary to operation of the present proposal; or (b) The present proposal facilitates or is a necessary prerequisite to future activities. The scope of the proposal is not limited by the juris- diction of the lead agency. The fact that future parts of a proposal 'will require future governmental approvals shall not be a bar to their present consideration, so long as the plans for those future parts are specific enough to allow some evaluation of their potential environmental impacts. Acting agencies and lead agencies should be alert to the possibility that a proposal may involve other agencies with jurisdiction which may not be taking any action until sometime in the future. (For example, in a proposal for a plat approval, another agency with juris- diction may be the appropriate sewer district, even though the sewers may not be installed until several years later.) (3) The impacts of a proposal include its direct im- pacts as well as its reasonably anticipated indirect im- pacts. Indirect impacts are those which result from any activity which is induced by a proposal. These include, but arc not limited to impacts resulting from growth in- duced by the proposal, or the likelihood that the present action will serve as a precedent for future actions. (For example, adoption of a zoning ordinance will encourage or tend to cause particular types of projects.) Contem- poraneous or subsequent development of a similar na- ture, however, need not be considered in the threshold determination unless there will be some causal connec- tion between this development and one or more of the (12/22/77) i I i ] Ins weep - eoll►a'J governmental decisions necessary for the proposal in question. (4) The lead agency may divide proposals involving extensive future actions into segments, with an EIS pre- pared for each segment. In such event, the earlier EIS shall describe the later segments of the proposal and note that future environmental analysis will be required for these future segments. The segmentation allowed by this subsection shall not be used at the threshold deter- mination stage to determine that any segment of a more extensive significant proposal is insignificant; nor shall segmentation be applied to require significant duplica- tion of analysis contained in an earlier EIS. (5) For proposed projects, such as highways, streets, pipelines or utility lines or systems where the proposed action is related to a large existing or planned network, the lead agency may at its option treat the present pro- posal as the total proposal, or select only some of the future elements for present consideration in the thresh- old determination and EIS. These categorizations shall be logical with relation to the design of the total system or network, and shall not be made merely to divide a larger system into exempted fragments. [Order DE 77- 24, § 197 -10 -060, filed 12/22/77; Order 75 -1, § 197- 10 -060, filed 12/17/75.] WAC 197 -10 -100 Summary of information which may be required of a private applicant. (I) There are three areas of these guidelines where an agency is al- lowed to require information from a private applicant. These are: (a) Environmental checklist; (b) Threshold determination; and, (c) Draft and final EIS. Further information may be required if the responsi- ble official determines that the information initially sup- plied was not reasonably adequate to fulfill the purpose for which it was required. An applicant may voluntarily submit, at any time, information beyond that which may be required under these guidelines. (2) Environmental Checklist. A private applicant is required to complete an environmental checklist as set forth in WAC 197 -10 -365 either concurrently with or after filing the application. Explanations for each "yes" and "maybe" answer indicated thereon are required. Agencies may not require a complete assessment or "mini –EIS" at this stage. [See WAC 197 -10 -310]. (3) Threshold Determination. The lead agency shall make an initial review of a completed checklist without requiring more information from a private applicant. After completing this initial review, the lead agency may require further information from the applicant, including explanation of "no" answers on the checklist. This infor- mation shall be limited to those elements on the envi- ronmental checklist for which, as determined by the lead agency, information accessible to the lead agency is not reasonably sufficient to evaluate the environmental im- pacts of the proposal. Field investigations or research by the applicant reasonably related to determining the en- vironmental impacts of the proposal may be required. [See WAC 197 -10 -330.] (12/22/77) Environmental Policy act 197 -10 -150 (4) Draft and Final EIS Preparation. If the guidelines of the lead agency so provide, an EIS may be prepared by the applicant under the direction of the responsible official. [See WAC 197 -10 -420.] Alternatively, the re- sponsible official may require a private applicant to pro- vide data and information which is not in the possession of the lead agency relevant to any or all areas to be cov- ered by an EIS. A private applicant shall not be required to provide information which is the subject of a pre – draft consultation request until the consulted agency has responded, or the forty –five days allowed for response by the consulted agency has expired, whichever is earlier. [Order DE 77 -24, § 197 -10 -100, filed 12/22/77; Order 75 -1, § 197 -10 -100, filed 12/17/75.] WAC 197 -10 -150 Exemptions exclusive —CEP approval of changes in exemptions. (1) The only actions exempt from the threshold determination requirements of this chapter are those which are categorically ex- empted in WAC 197 -10 -170, 197 -10 -175 and 197 -10- 180. Except to specify emergencies as allowed in WAC 197 -10 -180, agencies shall create additional exemptions in their guidelines only after obtaining approval of CEP in accordance with either subsection (2) or (3) of this section. • (2) An agency may petition CEP, pursuant to RCW 34.04.060, to adopt additional exemptions or to delete existing exemptions through amendments to these guidelines. Such petition shall set forth the language of the amendment requested, the reasons for the requested amendment, the requesting agency's views on the im- pacts to the environment resulting from the activities covered by the proposed amendment, and the approxi- mate number of actions within any stated time period of the type proposed for exemption or deletion which come 'before the agency. CEP shall consider and make a de- termination upon any such petition within thirty days of receipt. If the determination is favorable, CEP will initi- ate the rule– making procedures of chapter 34.04 RCW, to amend these guidelines. Amendments to these guide- lines will apply either generally or to specified classes of agencies. Affected agencies shall amend their guidelines accordingly after the amendments to the CEP guidelines become effective. (3) An agency may also petition CEP for an immedi- ate ruling upon any request to add or delete an exemp- tion. If such a petition is granted, CEP will notify the petitioning agency, which may immediately thereafter include the modification approved by CEP in its own guidelines. CEP may thereafter initiate procedures to amend these guidelines to incorporate the approved modification. Until the CEP guidelines are amended, any modification granted under this subsection shall ap- ply only to the petitioning agency or agencies. (4) CEP will provide public notice of all proposed amendments to these guidelines in the manner required by the Washington Administrative Procedures Act (chapter 34.04. RCW). A copy of all CEP approvals under subsection (3) of this section will be given to all persons who have made request to CEP for advance no- tice of its rule – making proceedings. (Ch. 197 -10 WAC—p 51 BMc /set TO: Spokane County Hearing Examiner FROM: Bob.McCann SUBJECT: PE 1407 - Valley Vista Estates OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER Spokane County, Washington April 24, 1981 The County Engineer is supportive of the development of a master plan concept for the area in which the above - referenced plat is located. Items of concern include shallow soils and potential problems with the disposal of storm water runoff, traffic circu- lation within the plat and the immediate area, and the impacts of traffic flows upon adjacent neighborhoods. The steep terrain of the site and adjacent properties dictates the development of a master plan which would identify roads by both type and function as well as determine the most suitable location for them. TO: Spokane County Hearing Examiner FROM: Bob McCann ID//q SUBJECT: PE 1407 - Valley Vista Estates The County Engineer is supportive of the development of a master plan concept for the area in which the above - referenced plat is located. Items of concern include shallow soils and potential problems with the disposal of storm water runoff, traffic circu- lation within the plat and the immediate area, and the impacts of traffic flows upon adjacent neighborhoods. The steep terrain of the site and adjacent properties dictates the development of a master plan which would identify roads by both type and function as well as determine the most suitable location for them. BMc /set OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER Spokane County, Washington April 24, 1981 AGENDA, April 29, 1981 TELEPHONE: 456 -2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Wednesday, April 29, 1981 - 9:00 A.M.(Item #4 on Morning Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PS- 1407 -81, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES ZS- 40 -81, UNCLASSIFIED TO SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R -1) a. Location: Located south of that area generally known as the Ponderosa and west of Painted Hills development area. It is adjacent to and south of the Myron Estates No. 8 Subdivision and approximately 1/4 mile west of the intersection of Mohawk Drive and the Dishman Mica Road. b. Legal Description: Section 4, Township 24N, Range 44 EWM Being a legal description of a portion of Government Lot 9, Section 4, County of Spokane, State of Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the NW corner of Lot 9, th. E 1330 ft. along the N line of Lot 9, to the west line of Ponderosa Drive as monumented in Myron 8 Estates, also being the true point of beginning of this legal description, th. S 34 °W 530 ft. to a point of curvature, th. SWly 324.98 ft. along a curve to the right to a point of tangency; th. S 82 °W 430 ft. to an angle point; th. S 8 °E 60 ft. to an angle point; th. S 82 °W 170 ft. to an angle point; th. S 16 ° E 260 ft. to an angle point; th. S 3 °W 325 ft. to an angle point; th. E 265 ft. to an angle point; th. N 21 °E 285 ft. to an angle point; th. S 68 °E 20 ft. to an angle point; th. N 30 °E 265 ft. to an angle point; th. N 87° E 515 ft. to an angle point; th. N 37 °E 175 ft. to an angle point; th. N 18 °E 75ft. to an angle point; th. N 60 ° W 320 ft. to an angle point; th. N 34 °E 480 ft. to the north line of Lot 9; th. W 72ft. along the N line of Lot 9 to the true point of beginning, containing 11 acres more or less. c. Sponsor: Robert Bethards P.O. Box 2704, T.A. Spokane, WA. 99220 d. Surveyor: Billy J. Tucker E 12721 Sprague Spokan,e WA. 99216 e. Site Size: 11 acres f. Number of Lots: 12 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings h. Existing Zoning: Unclassified i. Proposed Zoning: R -1 j. Water Source: Washington Water Power Co. k. School District: Central Valley #356 1. (Method of Sewage Disposal: Septic tanks m. Environmental Impact: Regarding the State Environmental Policy Act, this proposal has been examined by the Planning. Department staff. Pursuant to WAC 197 -10 -040 (29) and 197 -10 -060, the staff has determined that all of the land to the south, bounded by the railroad and the terrain features of Brown's Mountain, is functionally related to the present proposal. When reviewing the direct and indirect impacts of the total proposal, it is the staff's position that a declaration of significance should be issued and an Environmental Impact Statement prepared. However, a final decision can only be made after consideration of testimony and reports associated with the scheduled public hearing. -7- Po'vDRA DR A D yl 3 R D CT. 6ru nv6 ThJ BR. tic. 4-50 CHESTERI SCHOOL' -) Cw_SiEC EM IC, .RU oa PE -1407- 81 HALLETT J 1" =1000 OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON , 19 TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: COUNTY ENGINEER'S DEPARTMENT t SUBJECT: ROAD , CONDITIONS* Fog PLAT Pe liVeri VA \ \ 11S &STAVES * CONDITIONS LIRCLED APPLY TO PLAT UNDER CONSIDERATION 1 that conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer Is given subject to dedication of Right -of-Way and approval of the road system as Indicated In the preliminary plat of record. that plans profiles, and cross sections as designed to County standardds *hewing g proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road pl ans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer, E- 3 that drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities a submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or thq filing of the final plat, rainage plans to bq prepared under the direction of a I(censed'Protesslonel Civil Engineer. that the regulations of the National Flood insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat Is effected by a Flood Hazard Zone. • u , n o d public isionofe nsedengineer /surveyors l whoshal performed furnish County Engineer with "As Bulitw pions and a'certificate In writing that alt Improve- ments were Installed to the !Ines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replayed; no construction work'Is to be performed within the,exlsting or proposed Public Right of Way ntll a permit has been Issued by the County Engineer. All 'work Is'subJect to Inspection and approval by the County Englneor; • • all construction within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way Is to be Com- pieted prior to tiling the final plat or a bond In the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of Improvements construction artifice- tlon uAs Built* plans4. and monumentln9 the street centerlines shall b• flied with the. c Engineer; E 8 -no direct access from lots to 1/2 Right of -Ways until such roads ore constructed to County Standards end established as County Roads; E 9 -no direct access from lots to Stub Road connection's until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County , Roads; road design, construction, and drainage control for 1/2 Right of Ways and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the Developer; that appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held In rust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded; A 1 ttt. strip at the ends or.edges'of all streets that terminate or border the plot boundary. (Tom - porary cut do sacs are required when street; terminate at the plat bounderle,.? that Individual driveway access permits be required prior to ISSUanCe of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County.road system. �. E13 of additional Right of Way along additional Right of Way along additional Right of Way along E14 -no direct access be allowed from lots to EIS -that a statement be placed In the plat dedlcatlon.provlding for future slope ease- ments as required by Spokane County along EIb existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and /or curbed to the standards of the County Engineer; curbed on plot side of rood, E17 that all public roads within the plot be curbed and /a paved to the specifications of the County Engineer; . E1B -that sidewalks are required along the arterial(sl on • 1 ( Public Road Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section . (1 Section Number 2. ForP,,NApPn a DQ Minimum Paving width e — 0 AaT $ T¢ (2 Section Number — For r,.t_pp_S };t. Minimum Paving width e,at_ s ♦ ._ • (3 Section Number For M nimum Paving (4 Section Number - For Minimum Paving width E20 -that the owner, his grantees and assigns agree to participate In and not.oppo or protest a future Road Improvement District or County Road Project on to satisfy the requirements of the CountyY pay I ng p icy Isis condition may De rescinded if the County Engineer determines't hot paying end /or . curbing Is 'necessary for control and disposal of storm water runoff; E21 -th at the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal acceptable to the State Highway of the proposed State Highway Road -intersection. .State Highway Department approval of' the proposed design must be received 'prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway -aTO to be the responsibility of the Sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such Improvements furnished to the County Engineer In the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. E22- proposed private roads) serving lots with; no extension possible; ex- tension to serve 8 or'ie — ss lots; future pub ITV — Right of Way tract; F23 -trot private rood(s) be Improved to standards adopted by the Board of County Commis- . stoners; 'minimum easement width. minimum Improvement wldtn. Subject to approval under Suction 10.22 o( —rang County Fire Code. E24 -that the following statement be 'placed In the plat dedication: WARNING: Spokane County leas no responsibility to build Improve, maintain, or other- wise service the'privatu roads contained within or providing service to the property describud In this plat. by occupting - this plat or subsequently by allowing a building I:ormlt to bo Issued on property on a private rood, Spokane County assumes no 1,bllga:lun for said pr Iveto land and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has n0 obligation ill oily kind or naluro whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, con•,Ir wl , ellor, repair, Improve, maintain provide drainage or snow removal on a . pr1vat road. 1 r uil u l remen1 Is and shall run with the land and shall be binding ilon 11 ur Shot, bu ll cCo.ur or assigns In lugt I it t�. fpY oblige ER) Ion to parrl clee re In 11liu no. nionancu „f the . e pr read aS provide0 ��re E li L • a • e' a -A 'tC'tnht Ttta p tiv S j o tcscu a Cleo Pacicic- RA.NaDikci 1c Ths. Uiciailty o4 Solid PIAT• 0.1011••• OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ADR:t 10 , i9 Fs TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: COUNTY ENGINEER'S DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: ROAD CO Fo PLAT PE t'40 VA \\;b '1ST ESTA\ES !CONDITIONS LIRCLED APPLY TO PLAT UNDER CONSIDERATION that conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer Is given subject to dedication of Right -of -Way and approval of the road system as Indicated In•the preliminary plat of record. a that plans profiles. and -cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed s centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Enggineer Tor . approval prior to construction and /or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be .,prepared under the direction of o licensed' Professional Civil Engineer, that drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drelnage • facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and /or the filing of the final plat. rainage plane to be preppred under the direction of a licensed'Professlonal CIvll Engineer. that the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat Is effected by a Flood Hazard Zone. constructlon'withln the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of,a Ilcensed'engineer /surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "ASBulltn plena and p'certiflcate In writing /hat 411 Improve- ments were Installed to the 1Ines and grades shown on the approved construction plans end that ell. dlsturbed monuments hove been replaced; • no construction work'ls to be performed within the .existing or proposed Public Right of Way "until a permit has been Issued by the County 'Engineer. All work is,'subject to inspeptton and 'approval by the County Eagineer; all construction within the existing or proposed Public Right of Way Is to be com- pleted prior to filing the plat or a bond In the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of constructlon,of Improvements construction certlflca- tlon ' PAs Bullts plans' and monumenting the street centerlines shall' be filed with the County "Engineer; ' • E 0-no direct:access from Tots to 1/2 Right of until such roads ere constructed to County Standards and establlahed es County :Roads; • .E 9- -no direct` access from lots to Stub Rosa connections until, such roads are constructed to County Standards"and'establlshed as.County .Roods; road design, construction, and drainage control for 1/2 Right of Mays and Stub Road ' connections ore the respopsibility of the Developer; . that appropriate provision be made that the following described property he 'held In r the continuation of the streets be,dedlcated. or deeded: A 1 strip at :the ends or•adges'at all streets that terminate or border the plat boundaryY (Tem- porary•cul de secs are required when streets terminate at the plpt bounderles.) . • that individual driveway access permits be required prior to- Issuance of o building pormlt'for drlvewey' approaches to the County,.road system. E13 dedlcatlon of additional Right of Way along .addltlonal Right of Way along additional Right of Mey *long . E14 -no direct access be allowed from lots to E15 -that a statement be placed In the plat dedlcatton_provlding for future slope ease- ments.as required by Spokane County along • ounty roads providing direct access to the plat shll be paved and /or . curbed t a o "the standards of the County'Fnglneer; curbed plat sldo'of .rood. that all public roads w1thln ^the plat be curbed and /at paved to, the specifications of the County Engineer; E18-that sidewalks era required along the arterlol(sl on 1 ( Public Road Standard TYPICAI.Roadway Sactlon - • (I Section Number 2. For Mtt op�,�t Df� , Mlnlmum Paving width a o A2T• S`1'd • (2 Section Number �— For q _5 sC Rt Minimum Paving width � ry � (3) Section Number For M nimum Paving width (4) Section Number For Minimum Paving width E20 -that the owner, his grantees and assiggnsg agree'to participate In and not.oppoae or protest a future Road Improvement District or County Road Project on to satisfy the requirements of the Count paving policy. 'rigs condition may oe rescinded If The Count - Engineer determines hot paring end /or curbing Is necessary for-control and disposal of storm water- runoff; ' i:' E21 -that the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal acceptable to the Stpte Highway Department of the proposed State Highway-County Road Intersection. State Highway Department approval of'the proposed design must be received to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State are to be the responsibility of 'the Sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such Improvements furnished to the County Engineer In the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. E22- proposed private road(s) serving . lots with: no extension possible; ex- tension to serve 8 or less lots; future publ Klyht of Way tract; E23-that private road(s) be Improved to standards adopted by the Board of County Commis- sioners; minimum easement width; minimum improvement width, SutiJe tb'uplrovel under Section 10.20/ of The spolane County Fire Code. E24 -that the following statement be'placed In the plat dedication: WARNING: Spokanetounty has no responsibility to build Improve, maintain, or other wise service tho private roads contained within or prov service to the property described In this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to bu issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or naturu whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, cling repair Improvo, maintain, rovide drainage or snow removal on a privet° road. This requirement Is and shall run with the land and shat be binding noQon ih oMour }hull hairs success or assions including fbg obliga to parit1 cipate In the molnteuanco of I private roe a prov de rein. (AVER) E' t: AS 14m,n,&H , Q,v. d Pa�i� ►� RA : \ctogd The utciNnny 0 4 said P141. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM ALL SIGNATURE BLOCKS (ON PARRS 2 AND 3) MUST BE FILLED IN, IF APPROPRIATE, BEFORE RETURNING TO THE PLAT ADMINISTRATOR. 6 Part I - To'be completed by applicant and' surveyor AREA AND DISTANCE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Total amount of land in this-Subdivision: (I t Proposed•density,of the Plat: Total amount of land controlled by this owner or sponsor: Proposes Use of controlled adjoining land: What is the driving distance.in to the nearest fire station? Shopping facili+ thi6 C . Municipal Boundary* (p W.(Ci highway 1 (4 ? LAND USE** ** ** ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** Describe any non - residential use proposed in the Plat: 1.1 acres. acres. Acres -.Indicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: Number of bedrooms `1t Estimated Sale Price • Indicate the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings Duplexes ( ). Indicate lots for duplexes: Multi - family dwelling units ( ).' Indicate which lots: Mobile Homes ( . .). Other ( ). Describe other uses: What is the present use of the property proposed to List type of uses: Cultivated land: Timber: acres, Vacant: AEI Is keeping of animals desired? % No'(()e ): .Proposed Zonino: ' .._ ' "'>" • r_ IMPROVEME i**************** * * * * ** * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** • be platted? UaC Pasture: Other: 'Type: r. Total Number of.Lots 12 '';Doyou plan to filg thg Plat in its entirety as proposed, or will it be a multi -phase deve- lopment ?•• k_ To -what -ievel`of improvement will streets tie constructed? Gravel ( ) - Minimum, .Curb and, Gravel.(' ) . Curb and Paved (. x ) . Paved only ( ) . 'De�sCribe any':combinations of above: ,'- , - -:. e` c . - WEiat is•'the time period expected for complete development of the Plat: S ` � r Street improvements completed? 9w-). . Substantial number of lots occupiedd ?1 Is dedication'�of any land for public use contempleted? (Parks, schools, etc.) No. (( ). Yes ( ). Describe: v =,- ISC0IT EXHIBIT B • 7o,cxc 90 acres. Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No (x ). Yes ( ). Will any special deed restrictions b < e£ ncluded in the sale of lots? No ( If " es ", explai - nw 'ate i rVUULtMLUA -' S` - - -.cootbr. a1( 2�. 1) - .Lots /Gross Acre Paved street or -'. UTILITTES * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** .. ;,Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank (/ ) Lagoon ( r plant' (` "? ). ` Other, or combinations (Describe) Indicate the proposed source of water supply: Individual wells ( ). Public system ( - Private community system ( . Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings): Underground utility easements ( ) ). Overhead utility easements Utilities in streets ( ). No easements ( ). .Indicate the distance from this proposal to the nearest existing water main: `- ( --tY - feet - .Indicate size of nearest main: Sid inches. - OVER- Square feet Acres Acres Yes ec ).• UTILITIES.- (Continued) * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** I;the undersigned, • been prepared by me County NOTARY SEAL:', •E X H I B I P A PREGIMINARY.PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued o,•N h (Signed) (Address) Date: Part II - to be completed by water. purveyor zip: 9904: List utility.companies or districts expected to provide service to this Plat: Electricity: UX.ZS? .Gas: Ui Water: Ut_0 Phone: 'ACKNOWLEDGMENTS**,*** 1 f ' \ PROPOSED. PLAT NAME: 1 : vc L��� 15 ' - E5 t1e a Zip:. ��C ��Gt 'fl • (24-4G'�' C Date: • have completed the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat has under my supervision in accordance with the requirements of.the._Spokane,• rtment and the laws of the State o' I, the undersigned, 'swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses. are: made truthfully -and to the best'of my knowledge. I further swear that I AM THE OWNER OF', RECORD of the site proposed as the preliminary plat, or, if not the owner, attached here- with is written permission from said'owner authorizing my actions on his or -her behalf. I also understand, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack or full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of non significance) that it might'issue in reliance upon this checklist.,,> (Signed) \ • Date:.`; (t(i 5� P r z1 �f T, cfc3 (Address) • U X � � Phone: c T�LE- A.s:This subdivision (is) (iz not) situated within our service area, B... We are (able) O and willing to supply this subdivision with adequate water'for: • (domestic) (fire) (in +r; , i.) (commoroial) uses. C ;+;`'Satisfactory arrangement (have not) been made to serve this proposal. D.' Signat / uree / ( ( only, when items A,. B & C are true and complet d) • I F as .r) �wcv ...,,A . w : .� / /0 purveyors name . . signat =•and title .,date Part III -to -be completed by Health District F.. •��fM • A. Health District staff has.•completed a field investigation of the site B ,S - Health District requirements for preliminary plats have ta3re -.aet) been K Yy .. t ignature and /v1 le * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *.* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *•,* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *•. Planning Department Information a ; gica ■ / Preliminary Plat Fee: / 1220 1 „3' /f - 8/ 0 Checklist Fee: 4:/0 Date Submitted Date Accepted: '"' "Plat File No: Plat Name: 0,4 / J,:, i ;;.Number of Lots: /0.2 r r L i l'' Location: Sec. School District: Part IV - To be completed by County Office E X H I B I T A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) County Engineers Office requirements for preliminary plats have (have rat) been satisfied subject to submission and approval of drainage . calculations and drainage plan. -; Part V - To be completed by County Utilities Dept. County Utilities Department requirements for preliminary pla ttrTvt 'ntrilj been satisfied. Signature ure and Title Signature '.nd Title This part to be completed by Planning Department /95 - /17 -2/ 7 T 021 / R Y/ (��� vt % Checked by: Hearing Date: *.* * * * * * * * * * * * * * a /l ??// Date Advertised Zone Cfaange: / Page 3' • Zone Change File No: 2 =-C - / 0 45/ --- 1 Existing Zoning: 44/4144 L ncim Date Established: /X50 /pj ' E PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM I .I Describe any non - residential use proposed in the Plat: EXHIBIT B ALL SIGNATURE BLOCKS (ON PAGPS 2 AND 3) -MUST BE FILLED IN, IF APPROPRIATE, BEFORE RETURNING . TO THE PLAT ADMINISTRATOR. <v c." Part I - To be completed by applicant and surveyor AREA AND . DISTANCE***********************#***#******* s************ ss * * * * * * * *s * *s** * * *s **ss ** ** **. Total amount of land in this Subdivision: tit Acres Total Number of Lots 12 Proposed density of the Plat: .Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: Proposes Use of controlled adjoining land: 1`.0\- .What is the driving dist in miles to the nearest fire station? j Shopping'facilities? 1 Ottle, Municipal Boundary: (p WLes highway i 4 n ? LAND USE****************************************** * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * *s* **** Indicate the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings (X ). Duplexes ( ). Indicate lots for duplexes: Multi - family dwelling units ( ). Indicate which lots:. Mobile Homes ( ). Other ( ). Describe other uses: Is keeping of animals desired? No '(e). Yes ( ). Type: Proposed Zoning: PR IMOVEMENTS ** ************ s******* s******** s**** * * * * *** * * * * * * * * * ** * * ** * * * * * ** ** Lots /Gross Acre y� Acres . Paved street or What is the present use of the property proposed.to be platted? .'l/ac1 List type of uses: Cultivated land: acres. Pasture: acres. Timber: acres. Vacant: All acres. Other: Do you plan to filg the Plat in its entirety as proposed, or will it be a multi -phase deve- lopment? To what levet/ of improvement will streets y'e constructed? Gravel ( ) - Minimum. Curb and Gratei�( ). Curb and Paved ( >C). Paved only ( ). Describe any' . combinations of above: What is the time period expected for complete development of the Plat: I r Street -improvements completed? 9 wtb. . Substantial number of lots occupied? ITV - Is dedication of any land for public use contempleted ?. (Parks, schools, etc.) No. (( ). Yes ( ). Describe: e1.=.r'• LL ` 1 Indicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: t5(50±: Square feet. Number of bedrooms 3 • Estimated Sale Price - 100a...) --- 9b ) - ■ Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No (X). Yes ( ). Will any special deed restrictions bje ncluded in the sale of lots? No ( 1p --_Yes ()(, ).• If "yes", e x - tote.. restrictions b t t. <? 11/1.1U�d1KUr --.. S`/�i 2)G t v 7 llcr Cc( al ) gi� J U JJ UTIL rt** *• * * * * * * * # * * * * * * * ** ** * * * ** * * *i Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank (2( ). Lagoon ( ). Treatment plant ( ). Other, or combinations (Describe) Indicate the proposed source of water supply: Individual wells ( ). Public system (X) . Private community system ( ). Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings): Underground utility easements ( IC). Overhead utility easements ( ). Utilities in streets ( ). No easements ( ). Indicate the distance from this proposal to the nearest existing water main: ( tC f feet Indicate size of nearest main: l0 . " inches. - OVER- Acre s .PROPOSED PLAT NAME: I, the undersigned, been prepared b me County &v. NOTARY SEAL: C. S * * * * * * * * * * * ** (Signed) (Address) NOTARY E X E I B I E PRELIMINARY..PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) UT:LITTF'S. - (Continued)******************** * * **. *" List utility companies or districts expected to provide Electricity: (i-tts? •Gas: U.gA ' Water: 0154. CE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS * * * * * * * * * * *:: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** D I T t J { o, l X Z. fT; Lisa )2(4-1,4 laZ41-(47Lei Zip: Date: Phone: Zip: Date: Part III -to be completed by Health District A. Health District stiff has completed a field investigation of the 3 /IC /g1 • service to this Plat: Loco? Phone: P have completed the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat has under my supervision in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane rtment and the laws of the State off:Washingtin. (Signed) 1`JIIL Date: /Z 19c. -Th (Address) /L1 z,( t — T !/E Phone: 926- /St/ Est (}c7 ` z/6 SURVEYOR' I, the undersigned, 'swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully.and to the best'of my knowledge. I further swear that I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD of the site proposed as the prelim = nary plat, or, if not the owner, attached here - with is written permission from said'owner authorizing my actions on his or her behalf. I also understand, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack or full disclosure on my,part, Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of non significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist. • **************************************************************** * *** **** * ** * * * * * ** * ** * * * * * * * *** Part II - to be completed by water purveyor A. This subdivision (is) (ic -met.) situated within our service area. B. We are (able) (act ,.Llc) and willing to supply this subdivision with adequate water for` (domestic) (fire) (inA»- +r -i3)) ( e3aa) uses. C. Satisfactory arrangement (Jaiue•) (have not) been made to serve this proposal, D. Signature (only when items A, B & C are true and complet d) (' purveyors name signet -.and title date site. Page 2 B. Health District requirements for preliminary plats ha v_e (zee - aet) been satisfied. • * * * * * * ** * * * * * * • .* ************.********** * ** * ***** * ** * * * *** *** ** * ** * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Part IV - To be completed by County Engineers Office A. County Engineers Office requirements for preliminary plats have (have mot.) been satisfied subject to submission and approval of drainage calculations and drainage plan. B: Signature 1• i1 Sign ure and Title E X H I B I T - A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) / 2B& k-/ Date *.* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Part V - To be completed by. County Utilities Dept. A. County Utilities Department requirements for preliminary plat have (have not) been satisfied. B. Signature Signature and Title • / / Date * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * This part to be completed by Planning Department Planning Department Information Date Submitted: Preliminary Plat Fee: Date Accepted: Checklist Fee: Plat File No: Zone Change File No: Plat Name: Existing Zoning: Number of Lots: Date Established: Location: Sec. T R Advertised Zone Change: School District: Checked by: Hearing Date: Page 3 , c , • t ' RECEIPT \ : _ _ ._ _19_51 58:i0 R j (20:: i oc.1 From . • e/2_, _ • _ e(•?,gy t" icIrt s It' o . fre C .Dollars . .... For / . . /47//ey 14' 5nm- . - _ .. I . . . .... _. _ , i---r-- .. . , , , ; • ex--..- ) By _ 1 .... __ _._ ......._ Lb: kitid 0 .. , . 1 ,"" fr NO. 1 I. 1 1 , 7( I e 19 81 111251 1 1 . I LIV E ; THE CO L lyC l it. O ire_e r „„„,.:1.(,„: i. I — !, _ DOLLARS ‘u-y) ic „nit r _,_..) , ) c ...., i, II/1 r.- P, stgcnmistBank ( .)t i I SPOKANC. WASHINGTON 0.1.G f i . t:e1t I 1 . 4 I : I 25 1.000891: tl LI Midi 5 2w 20 .-si i L.----,_ — — — —.----------•---------..---,--,-- .., ...--,-.......,...-r--aea...z..c-..3.- ,....r...I ■ i r .s Return to County Engineer Right of Way Department I rnuuTVru rurrc :24P Title Reference Number Grantor Crhn ` Ll°yda— Grantee S zOol(0 n e- (1, a ft Legal Description Lo-f- l Sld al< ( fait V rs-I+, s+a-1 Assessors parcel Number / /moo /7 a' /o/ Additional Legal Description on Page Filed for record at request of John Kirkland 11020 E. Ponderosa Dr. Spokane, WA 99206 Dated this 10th day of September, 2001. A `A �� �A T. KIRKLAN t 1SL. 3- OY YA KIRKLA D STATE OF WASHINGTON } ) SS COUNTY OF SPOKANE } C: \WPW IN60\ WPDOCSISIMPROPERtY \'ORFIS\EASKIRK. WPD 11 11 1 EASEMENT 11 rnuu v cur ucco 1 1 111 1 11 11 4663829 Page: 2 of 2 12110,'2001 01 :24P 0,Aks. r„ WA_ The Grantors, JOHN T. KIRKLAND and LLOYDA KIRKLAND, husband and wife, as owners of property in Spokane County legally described as Lot 1 in Block 1 of VALLEY VISTA ESTATES, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 66; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. Parcel No. 44042.2401 FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF MUTUAL BENEFIT hereby grant unto the Grantee, Spokane County, an easement over, under, upon, and across the northeasterly 15 feet of said property for waste water drainage. R. E. Excise Tax Exempt Date I a 11 20b1 Spokane County T _ By ut6iKII� --�- -i On this day personally appeared before me JOHN T. KIRKLAND and LLOYDA KIRKLAND, husband and wife, to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he /she /they signed the same as his/her /their free and voluntary act t \ and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. 1 \ tit Given under my hand and official seal this day of S bet“) ,(19 4iI6.; ' , i✓ _: gBZ� -ti 4. s % „, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington , �� p \� . residing at Spokane A 1 '', c 2 ; - ,:t. My Commission Expires: d�s�0 12'— 1t � c "'�\��„ "4 - • December 7, 2001 John Kirkland 11020 E Ponderosa Drive Spokane, WA 99206 RE: Stormwatcr Easement on Parcel # 44042.2401, Valley Vista Estates Lot 1, Block 1 Dear Mr. Kirk This letter is to help address the issue of modifying the stormwater easement on your property. The easement as shown on the face of the plat seems to be interfering with your plans for your property. You have had a new easement surveyed that will address the stormwater needs, and we are agreeable that it will function as well as the existing stormwater easement. However, in order to eliminate the existing easement, you would have to go through a plat amendment process that is cumbersome costly and can be lengthy. To save you the time and trouble of that process this letter is to address what will be done with the existing easement if it is not eliminated by a plat amendment. The existing easement will likely never be used in the future by Spokane County. The new easement is sufficient to handle the flows as expected during the design of the original plat, and will serve to pass the water through your property and under the road to the stormwater area west of your he me. While the existing easement will not "go away ", it is not Spokane County's intent to use it for stormwater purposes when the new easement is recorded. I hope this addresses your concerns and helps to save you some time and energy on eliminating the existing easement by amending the plat. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Tammie Williams Environmental Programs Administrator cc: file IN THE MA 11'ER OF FILING THE FINAL ALTERED PLAT OF LOT 2 AND LOT 3 OF BLOCK 2, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES, PS- 1407 -81 IN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 44 EWM, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON WHEREAS, by the previous hearing and decision as contained in Board of County Commission Resolution 90 -1295, the Plat Alteration was approved subject to: A new plat drawing and dedication language to vacate an existing drainage easement and establish a new drainage easement, subject to review of the County Engineer's approval of the necessary storm drainage plans. WHEREAS, the County Engineer has reviewed this plat alteration and has approved the plat alteration on June 24, 1992. WHEREAS, the Planning Department has reviewed the plat alteration and finds it meets all conditions. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, that the Final Altered Plat of Lots 2 and 3, Block 2 of Valley Vista Estates be approved. ADDITIONALLY, until the final altered plat document is filed in the Spokane County Auditor's Office, the altered plat is not recorded. PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS O DAY OF JULY, 1992. A I"I'EST: By: NO. 92 1056 rile p 19o781 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR SPOKANE COUNTY R IAM E. DONAHUE ,Cle of the Board sanne Montague, Deputy Cler BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Jo . McBride, Chairman 4 Patricia A Steen H RESOLUTION No. 3D 12 '95 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF ALTERING THE FINAL PLAT OF ) VALLEY VISTA ESTATES (PS- 1407 -81) IN ) RESOLU11ON SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 44, E.W.M., ) SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ) WHEREAS THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON has received a petition from Ralph Guthrie, wherein the Board is asked to alter the final plat of Valley Vista Estates to vacate an existing drainage easement on Lot 2 of Block 2 and establish a new easement on Lot 2 of Block 2; and WHEREAS, the County Planning Department has reviewed the proposed alteration and reports no objection to it; and WHEREAS, the Board conducted a public hearing on the above noted request on October 16, 1990 after public notice of the proposal had been provided all adjacent property owners more than 10 days before the hearing. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the B oard of County Commissioners of Spokane County that the dedicatory language and drawing of the final plat of Valley Vista Estates shall be altered to vacate an existing drainage easement on Lot 2 of Block 2 and establish a new easement on Lot 2 of Block 2, subject to the County Engineers certification to the Clerk of the Board that the necessary storm drainage plan has been approved. PASSED BY THE BOARD THI$ 4 DAY OF OCTO ATTEST: WILLIAM E s: AHUE CLERK •' :•ARD By. • - eve tfr hairman tatt 1 Patricia; . Mummey ER, 1990. BOARD OF CCU COM OF SPOKANE n R. McBride IONERS HINGTON SPO.AN C OuFIV COURT eOVSC Agreement Number AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES This agreement between Spokane County and Ralph Guthrie whose interest in the project is Owner /seller this day of November applicable to the project known as: Plat amendment for Valley Vista Estates ( Lot 2, Block 2 ) That the individuals and parties named interest in the above described property or following: 1. Reimburse Spokane County for project review and inspection fees as specified in Board of County Commissioner's Resolution 80 -1592 attachment C, as amended. The fees will be based on actual salary costs incurred by Spokane County for project reviews and / or inspections plus a ten percent administrative charge, and will be billed monthly as accrued. 2. The undersigned agrees that these fees are due and payable upon receipt of the billing as specified above. The monthly billing should be sent to the attention of: Ralph Guthrie E. 13123 32nd. Ave. Snnkane� Washi 99216 (509) 926 -1561 N1 C(DIESLWI .]I .,. Cc(D _(,, x It! jy PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFF10E OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 is entered into , 19 9 . This agreement is herein as having an project agree to the I understand that failure to pay these fees may result in delay in completion or approval of the project or other possible sanctions. L 9 ) Ralph D. Guthrie lU Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 N0. 0 1295 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF ALTERING THE FINAL PLAT OF ) VALLEY VISTA ESTATES (PS- 1407 -81) IN ) RESOLUTION SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 44, E.W.M., ) . SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON WHEREAS THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON has received a petition from Ralph Guthrie, wherein the Board is asked to alter the final plat of Valley Vista Estates to vacate an existing drainage easement on Lot 2 of Block 2 and establish a new easement on Lot 2 of Block 2; and WHEREAS, the County Planning Department has reviewed the proposed alteration and reports no objection to it; and WHEREAS, the Board conducted a public hearing on the above noted request on October 16, 1990 after public notice of the proposal had been provided all adjacent property owners more than 10 days before the hearing. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County that the dedicatory language and drawing of the final plat of Valley Vista Estates shall be altered to vacate an existing drainage easement on Lot 2 of Block 2 and establish a new easement on Lot 2 of Block 2, subject to the County Engineers certification to the Clerk of the Board that the necessary storm drainage plan has been approved. PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS 4 DAY OF OCTO : ER, 1990. ATTEST: BOARD OF COU COM TONERS OF SPOKANE • HINGTON hn R. McBride TO: sam SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Thank You. Enclosure IS 91431 OtAirfarrtir MEMORANDUM PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456 - 2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 Spokane County County Engineer Spokane County Utilities Spokane County Health District Spokane County Department of Building & Safety Tim Lawhead, Planner II September 19, 1990 Review of Alteration for Final Plat PS- 1407 -81 Valley Vista Estates Enclosed find copies of the above - referenced altered final plat. Please review and forward any comments by October 4, 1990. If you have any questions you may contact Tim Lawhead at 456 -2205. c: Ralph Guthrie, 9211 E Trent Ave, Spokane, WA 99206 Spokane State of Washington . Date: W 7//r 6 Name of applicant: Ralph rl. Curhrie Street address F 13423 32nd. Ave. APP -P /SP /BSP (ALT) APPLICATION FOR ALTERATION OR VACATION OF ALL OR A PORTION OF A FINAL PLAT, SHORT PLAT OR BINDING SITE PLAN SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ci Spokane State: Wa. Zip Code: 99216 Phone: 926 -1561 Existing zone: Approved number of lots: 12 Legal description of property: for 2. Block 2 of Valley Vista Estates as per Plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 66; situate in the County of Section: 4 Township: 24 Range: 44 e.w.m. Source of legal: Title company Reference specific alteration(s) or vacation(s) desired: The appliranr wishes to delete the 15 drainage easement as shown on the face of the plat, and replace it with a drainage easement that reflects the existing natural drainage that is on the lo Will the alteration or vacation affect covenants filed with the final plat or BSP? Yes _ No Give explanation of request for change in the status of the proposal: This request i s prompted by the sale of the lot. The new purchaser does not wish to disturb the existing natural drainage. File No. PC. t5','7 7 -R/ NOTE: A REVISED DRAFT PLAT OR BSP DRAWING MUST BE SUBMITTED IF LOTS OR ROADS WITHIN THE PLAT WILL BE ALTERED. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANTfab@IaT: %C ar1 ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT FROM APPLICANT'S):.'_ > ri f , / r Page 1 9009100420 %`1 HARMLESS AGREEMENT ,^ tfc, e 04 Li. Z _ z 5 0a Is. WHEREAS, Valley. Vista. Estates has received final plat approval and was filed of record on June 11, 1985; in Plat Book 17, page 66; and VOL.1 39 PAGE 756 WHEREAS, the owner(s) of Lot 2, Block 2, Valley Vista Estates, would like to construct a single 'family home on said lot, but the current location of the drainage easement on the face of the plat, and the existing culvert conflict with the proposed home -site; and WHEREAS, the o*ner(s)'intends to seek an amendment or alteration of the plat, relocating the drainage way and the culvert to a location acceptable to the County Engineer; and WHEREAS, the owner(s) has requested Spokane County to issue a building permit for said lot pending approval by Spokane County of the altered or amended plat; and WHEREAS, Spokane County is willing to issue a building permit to the owner(s) only upon execution of this Hold Harmless Agreement, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Spokane County agreeing to issue the undersigned owner(s) a building permit, before the altered /amended plat is approved, the undesigned owner(s) hereby agrees to: 1. Immediately apply for amendment /alteration of that portion of the Valley Vista Estates plat comprising Lot 2, Block 2, providing for the relocation of the existing drainage easement and culvert to a location deemed suitable by the County Engineer. 2. Submit the proposed revision -of the easement and culvert location, and other pertinent information, to the County Engineer for approval, and obtain said approval. 3. Submit an amended /altered plat and plan showing the relocated easement and culvert. 4. Obtain the approval of the County Planning Department and Board of County Commissioners for the altered /amended plat before occupancy of any residence constructed on the site, and before final inspection is granted. 5. Hold Spokane County, its officers, agents, and employees harmless from any and all damages, expenses, claims, liabilities, courses of action, suits on and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, caused by or arising from the issuance of a building permit to the undersigned owner(s) before the Valley Vista Estates plat has been amended /altered, or caused by or arising from the failure by Spokane County to approve such alteration or amendment when applied for, provided such failure is justified. 6. Agrees that the above obligations shall run with the land. Agreed to this 7 of Septe w Sew , 1990 ar t STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SPOKANE, ) On this 7C- day of ".settt--/2-, , 1990, personally appeared before me 6uI/,n_;• a ,E,%,e,at 1/.:“.se , and acknowledged the above instrument to be their free and voluntary act, for the use and process mentioned. q ®'904„ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set •myrhand'and affixed my seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public residing at Spokane. APPROV ASP TO FO B coax Deputy Prosecuting Attorn in and f¢r A Sta e :' W,ashi c i f ye u p m . l : s / s53 p. DATE Cylinder No. Lab No. Date of test Cylinder age Height In. Diameter in. Cross Section sq.in. Wieght Cylinder lbs. Wieght, lbs. per cu.ft. Maximum Load lbs. Compressive Strength psi Fracture PROJECT: /4 n// //e / CONTRACTOR aLvLL . CEMENT BRAND: 14 Ati P.C.C. -1 SPOKANE COUNTY CONCRETE CYLINDER TEST DATE OF POUR: CONTRACT NO.: PERMIT NO • ' ODD SLUMP: AIR YIELD: CF PLACEMENT. j,,iJ 07-, / LO //lig7 i/✓t. . SUPPLIER CEMENT TYPE. - Z AIR ENT. AGENT. INSPECTOR• REMARKS: TYPE OF CONCRETE. l'-u/IA 7 / Z -l9 3 - 79 S -8 3 8 (cc 26 -28 )-g /a ° /ti‘ /7 " /,oZZ 6,06/ T993 ..28 ¢8 on FS di. 2/ �_ r An no /OS, oOO /00,900 38'30- 3Z-4/-0 � / 3A�3o DATE Cylinder No. Lab No. Date of test Cylinder age Height In. Diameter in. Cross Section sq.in. Wieght Cylinder lbs. Wieght, lbs. per cu.ft. Maximum Load lbs. Compressive Strength psi Fracture PROJECT: /4 n// //e / CONTRACTOR aLvLL . CEMENT BRAND: 14 Ati P.C.C. -1 SPOKANE COUNTY CONCRETE CYLINDER TEST DATE OF POUR: CONTRACT NO.: PERMIT NO • ' ODD SLUMP: AIR YIELD: CF PLACEMENT. j,,iJ 07-, / LO //lig7 i/✓t. . SUPPLIER CEMENT TYPE. - Z AIR ENT. AGENT. INSPECTOR• REMARKS: TYPE OF CONCRETE. l'-u/IA 7 /1-Q9 -6 -f97 74=794- 4- -89 =89 � s 2g 28 33u /„2.0 /02 0 / 2.O _:( 6).02 (3,o7 30 o2g 4 6, 2 91 28,6 29,6 a.g, /31< /f"<7 // /d Na S? o 94 nc 33on 99 C&0 3//O 30 ,20 6 4,/€.4 , L . // iY /C,4/ CONTRACTOR Ft 5 /i e f Cylinder No. Lab No. Date of test Cylinder age Height in. Diameter in. Cross Section sq.in. Wieght Cylinder Ibs. Wieght, Ibs. per cu.ft. Maximum Load Ibs. Compressive Strength psi Fracture REMARKS: /jet 0 P.C.C. -1 SPOKANE COUNTY CONCRETE CYLINDER TEST DATE S - / 6 ' 89 DATE OF POUR -5 9 — g9 TYPE OF CONCRETE "-/ 5 if gel ca - PROJECT: E UJ /C eaN PT, CONTRACT NO.: PERMIT NO.- r 'F 0 2 2 SLUMP: afr ( AIR: C % YIELD: CF PLACEMENT I^ UR33 IRUAI S'771 '/t80 - ea lo t </O and 7 1 2,5 z0 9'-2r GJEsr s, W e - n F / 3 0 L , v,g i? Rte/ SUPPLIER: AC--r - CEMENT BRAND: CEMENT TYPE AIR ENT. AGENT W/ / S7."r,,, / .3 /40 /15 c7 - /4/69.4 INSPECTOR '• S77PoN4s- ')LD HARMLESS AGREEMENT • WHEREAS, Valley Vista Estates has received final plat approval and was filed of won June 11, 1985, in Plat Book 17, page 66; and rcco$.4 WHEREAS, the owner(s) of Lot 2, Block 2, Valley Vista Estates, would like to construct a single family home on said lot, but the current location of the drainage easement on the face of the plat, and the existing culvert conflict with the proposed home - site; and WHEREAS, the owner(s) intend seek an amendment or alteration of the plat, relocating the drainage way and the culvert to a location acceptable to the County Engineer; and WHEREAS, the owner(s) has requested Spokane County to issue a building permit for said lot pending approval by Spokane County of the altered or amended plat; and WHEREAS, Spokane County is willing to issue a building permit to the owner(s) only upon execution of this Hold Harmless Agreement, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Spokane County agreeing to issue the undersigned owner(s) a building permit, before the altered /amended plat is approved, the undesigned owner(s) hereby agrees to: 1 Immediately apply for amendment/alteration of that portion of the Valley Vista Estates plat comprising Lot 2, Block 2, providing for the relocation of the existing drainage easement and culvert to a location deemed suitable by the County Engineer. 2. Submit the proposed revision of the easement and culvert location, and other pertinent information, to the County Engineer for approval, and obtain said approval. 3. Submit an amended /altered platsho�g the e location easement and culvert. 4. Obtain the approval of the County Planning Department and Board of County Commissioners for the altered /amended plat before occupancy of any residence constructed on the site, and before final inspection is granted. 5. Hold Spokane County, its officers, agents, and employees harmless from any and all damages, expenses, claims, liabilities, courses of action, suits on and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, caused by or arising from the issuance of a building permit to the undersigned owner(s) before the Valley Vista Estates plat has been amended /altered, or caused by or arising from the failure by Spokane County to approve such alteration or amendment when applied for, provided such failure is justified. 6. Agrees that the above obligations shall run with the land. Agreed to this day of , 1990 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SPOKANE, ) On this day of , 1990, personally appeared before me and acknowledged the above instrument to be their free and voluntary act, for the use and process mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane. My commission expires APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Deputy Prosecuting Attorney o suolsln� , .iaaui6u3 n u ,,., d ap9 ° wiau,.. 'suo!1°ast netts s6u a011s 6ui )0m e o1 aq II e ,io anuane l iadoid Alunoa Adn ° °o 01 - - mn°0 a41 ul Auadoid uo one 10 enuanealllipn ' siapioq Jo _° ,ieq Pa}uei61 de/ HOd SNOI10nH1SNI S.t 11 \‘)\.: . \ F.IhT ORPi�' \ \`' . • goute • H. 0.60x \ \� \ \ tk" I Qo2 .\DRAIi.i•f i cc.,:. • 9,0" Y.110E \:/ 12. 0. _ vleE • • fly 0 "6 \•6 g 5.4 V.112 I4\fik- qlo 0 4oP (1u9w) -10+. 3 'PS .t \/ L - 104 5A1,4 i" �3v DATE FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT NO. N/A REQUEST Fult DESIGN DEVIAl LON on the North by a natural area belonging to Spokane County Submitted By ROAD NAME Ponderosa Dr. & Guthrie Blvd. CRP /RID /PLAT /Z.C. No. PS- 1407 -82 Future R.I.D. PROJECT TITLE Valley Vista Estates PROJECT LIMITS A _new sub— __ division, extention of Ponderosa Drive in a Westerly direction, and Guthrie Blvd. in a Southeasterly direction. EXISTING CONDITIONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT: ROAD WIDTH N/A Section #2, Access for Guthrie Blvd. ROAD SURFACE N/A and collector for Ponderosa. To serve AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC N/A 12 lots. Current Design Year PROJECT DESCRIPTION A 12 lot subdivision, lot sizes of 1 acre or larger, bounded DESCRIPTION OF STANDARD INVOLVED (1) Sidewalk on both sides of:Ponderosa Dr. and (2) temp —cul —d —sac on the end of Guthrie Blvd • Date PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION (1) Delete sidewalk on the North side of Ponderosa Dr. (2) Deleting temp —cul —d —sac on terminus of Guthrie Blvd. JUSTIFICATION_ (1) Sidewalk or South side will more than adequately serve the needs of these and future lots. All of the area the North of Ponderosa Dr. has been given to the Parks Department. They have indicated that the wish to leave it in a natural or semi natural state. This would also continue the pattern established on Ponderosa Dr. two years ago when another R.I.D. was aQaroved. We feel that this is an unecessary expense to be borne by the lot owners within this future Road Im— provement District. • (2) Realizing that a temporary cul —d —sac would allow for emergency vehicle turn around etc., we feel that need can be addressed via an easement on both sides of Guthrie Blvd. to allow for this. Also this area is dotted with rock outcrooines. particularly to the South. Excavation would intail some e : :tre co Yts, Also Guthrie Blvd. is planned to be extended withip_te_u_ext 2 -3 years hat ai sent only only one lot would benefit from this temp— cul. —d —sic, b.ut'the paving and ruching cost would have to be borne by all 12 lots. Arthur M. Noll Development C.ordinator GUTIiRIE INVESTMENTS, INC. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS • _ a 123 TY__ n_ TA - A _ _ C. - P A R. ic z &Erp . _ r_ _ _LNI_Eau.sz eca t' Cal F C-Y NCL: L - AL_ Approved Sin E vvc4<. E Li moVe?-rir:o‘i . c - 2 1;1:1 r Approved Not Approved _--- 7 -- - _ e r- :s ozzLi_c_., k Approved 77 Approved Not Approved 7E- ■ rt.N.17„ ._ - -5 • e-- EL._ 14A. Ill 1;-) ct , „<„, • •,,„/".•--- •,- _ Not Approved (.2)/ - C • c . ,1 : C C f r Not Approved --------- 4 _ 'Section 1- - Engineer Date— V S.,-04: • •-f ft. tr,e--/e• cajca. fta.: CCe.11..:Led_.- rf.i1.4,A±teg-- 7 0 Traffic Engineer Da te Of ictigtneer 1: Division Engineer Li ounty Engineer Date 45 4 ec5 Da te / 7 /S:3 Da t e utte -e( e — P . :• • c , • ,: c • .-- I It e •- • ,,, • • si •-• s , ,„ (--,7 ,• s• ,„ , •„•\.; 0 4! E...,e) ,e23.‘,14;) :) Le., L. 11C ," <e" 6'7 7.) , c,., , • • • - )17- ,C)P)c);',/.././3 Cil';.5 '; _ .c; AL f't(7 . 1'`) f A a e s.; n r•• PL rir 0 ,t)e ) 7%4e Ae' yr, D Dt t Approved Not Approved l Adams& Clark Inc. Civil Engineers /Land Surveyors /Land Planners /Landscape Architects August 2, 1988 Mr. Gary Nelson, P.E. Engineering Division Spokane County Public Works North 811 Jefferson St. Spokane, WA 99260 -0180 Re: Private Driveway — Valley Vista Estates Dear Gary: We are submitting herewith a construction drawing for a private driveway to serve one lot from the Valley Vista Estates Subdivision (Lot 3, Block II), approved earlier, and five additional lots to be platted some time in the future. The driveway entrance centerline is approximately 605 feet southwest on Gertrude Drive from the intersection of Gertrude Drive and Ponderosa Drive. The plan includes a dry sewer line for future connection of all lots to two locations on Gertrude Drive. There is no existing public sewer line in Gertrude Drive. A preliminary design for the water service to the future lots is also included in the drawing. Spokane Suburban Water Company (or their successor) will prepare their own specific design for the water service to those lots. Attached is a photocopy of a water plan showing the existing water mains. As you will remember, the storm water runoff has been previously calculated and accommodated in the existing storm drainage ditches, culverts, and retention /detention pond. The driveway cross — section is identical to that of the private road, Bowman Lane, in Northwood Sixth Addition. The underlying soils are well— suited for roadbeds, other than the massive amount of rock encountered in this area. It is anticipated that some blasting may be required to construct the water and sewer line in the private driveway. Sincerely, ADAMS ✓; CLARK INC. Leslie D. Kill ngswo th, P.E. Principal Enclosure: Plan and Profile Sheet — Driveway, Water, Sewer Water Service Plan cc: Art Noll W. 1803 Maxwell Ave., Spokane, WA 99201 1509) 328 -5853 DANIEL B. CLARK, P.L.S. LESLIE D. KILLINGSWORTH, PE. STUART A. DEYSENROTH, A.S.L.A. 0+00 2+20 �� °-t ���� � �&^ � PI L= 0"000 0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 V+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+74 0+75 0+80 0+85 0+90 0+95 1+00 1+05 1+10 1+15 1+20 1+25 1+30 1+35 1+40 1+45 1+50 1+55 1+60 1+65 1+70 1+75 1+80 1+85 1+90 1+95 2+00 2+05 2+10 2+15 2+20 PI L= 250.000 2+20 2+25 2+30 2+35 2+40 2+45 2+50 2+55 2+6O 2+65 OFILE L/H Pt. 2123.7i / 2124.109 2124.518 2124.927 2125.336 2125.745 2126.155 2126.564 2126.973 2127.382 2127.791 2128.200 2128.609 2129.018 2129.427 2129.836 213O"245 2130.655 2131.064 2131.473 2131"872 2132,251 2132.611 2132.951 2133.271 2133.571 2133,852 2134.112 2134.353 2134.574 2134.776 2134.957 2135.119 2135.261 2135.383 2135.485 2135.568 2135.631 2135.674 2135.697 2135"70O 2135.684 2135.648 2135.592 2135.516 L/H Pt.=2135.701 @ 1+98"369 2135.516 2141.700 2135"421 2141.120 2135"306 2135.170 2135.016 2134.841 2134.646 2134"432 2134.198 2133"944 0.000 @ 0 2131.473 2131.882 2132"291 2132.700 2133.109 2133.518 2133.927 2134.336 2134.745 2135.155 2135.564 2135.973 2136.382 2136.791 2137.200 2137.609 2138.018 2138.427 2138.836 2139.245 2139"655 2140"O64 2140.473 2140^882 2141"291 2141.700 2140.539 2139.959 2139.379 2138"798 2138"718 2137.638 2137.058 2136.477 ^ ^ °�~ ��� 0 + �^K� v ^` " ���� ^ ^ �� ��v� �^��~,- ,._ ��� " � ��� Est �� ���� Est - Grade= 8.1827. C at a WV INN � ^ o� w ����� d ��� � � ,^ � � °* ^ � VAL � �� � � ��~ gs-r, �� ~~��� ' � ' ��� �~�/` Grade=. % 2+70 2133.671 2135.897 2+75 2133.377 2135.317 2+80 2133.064 2134.736 2+85 2132.731 2134.156 2+90 2132.379 2133.576 2+95 2132.006 2132.995 3+00 2131.614 2132.415 3+05 2131.202 2131.835 3+10 2130.770 2131.255 3+15 2130"318 2130"674 3+20 2129.847 2130.094 3+25 2129.355 2129.514 3+30 2128.844 2128.933 3+35 2128.313 2128.353 3+40 2127.763 2127.773 3+45 2127.192 3+50 2126.612 3+55 2126.032 3+60 2125.452 3+65 2124.871 3+70 2124,291 3+75 2123.711 3+80 2123.130 3+85 2122.550 3+90 2121.970 3+95 2121.389 4+00 2120.809 4+05 2120.229 2120"229 4+10 2119.684 2119.649 4+15 2119.197 2119.068 4+20 2118.768 2118.488 4+25 2118,397 2117.908 4+29.46 PI L= 50.000 L/H Pt. =2117"390 @ 4+54.46 Grade= 0"000% 4+29.46 2118.115 2117.390 4+30 2118.084 2117.390 4+35 2117.830 2117,390 4+40 2117.633 2117.390 4+45 2117.494 2117.390 4+50 2117.413 2117.390 4+55 2117.390 4+60 2117.390 4+60 2117.390 4+60 PI L= 0.000 L/H Pt.= 0.000 @ 0 Grade= CREST VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = 8.18181818182 GRADE #2 = -11.6060345651 DESIGN SPEED 20 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) 214.614327818 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (GIVEN) 250 GIVEN IS LARGER SIGHT DISTANCE 123^13559322 SAG VERTICLE CURVE, CALCULATE LENGTH GIVEN DESIGN SPEED GRADE #1 = -11.6060345651 GRADE #2 = 0 DESIGN SPEED 20 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE (CALCULATED) 211.769463765 LENGTH OF VERTICLE CURVE. (GIVEN) 50 WARNING... GIVEN LENGTH IS SHORTER THAN CALCULATED SIGHT DISTANCE 123.13559322 . DR/7E 227f i9 4 By Lot._ D ate 3'i Subject JIS Job No. 122? Sheet 1e of 1S t M E.' a&c- =e -c.-1 o�/ . 2 = ��-e�✓ S 3o' & CAP 2c c Ctko.T v ./tom 7.1) rrn 0 2 ! C 4. -o r_ s-' ��SS k (0, G3) ( ocoao t) (4,3) I1, - a 0 0 2 = 410.' -3 (3. -9 ) 241(.47. 5 %1 ice' v Z5 cC OVe2 -vW SEA AC . 1 Pow 4.3 (a-z, rb sruJ,>u o C O` ✓' raw U� 2. 1�= • 24 CM 0 - 367. 5 c s — ,fin em u_ n cc - DATE NAME , DESCRIPTION BASIN NAME 0 of Sub Areas HYDROGRAPH DESIGN PROGRAM INPUT FORM 4-Fier r BASIN INPUT DATA Rainfall (inches) Travel Time (hours) 9/10/84 Hydraulic Length (feet) 050// Watershed Slope ," /,•b , 0 7 DESIGN 4 Q D, ± cL + '4"1 643 /.. o /7+ . 7 9 1 3,T1 /V,4y cl, 11 _ z . o sG o./l &Oa7/ SUB AREA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9. ;( 10 Area in Acres 3 /,5 Runoff Coefficient DATE NAME , DESCRIPTION BASIN NAME 0 of Sub Areas HYDROGRAPH DESIGN PROGRAM INPUT FORM 4-Fier r BASIN INPUT DATA Rainfall (inches) Travel Time (hours) 9/10/84 Hydraulic Length (feet) 050// Watershed Slope ," /,•b , 0 7 DESIGN 4 Q D, ± cL + '4"1 643 /.. o /7+ . 7 9 1 3,T1 /V,4y cl, 11 _ z . o sG o./l &Oa7/ r. DATE NAME DESCRIPTION BASIN NAME 4 of Sub Areas BASIN INPUT DATA Rainfall (inches) fe- r f 9/10/84 HYDROGRAPH DESIGN PROGRAM INPUT FORM Hydraulic Length (feet) /1 0 O Watershed Slope (percent 13 - / p b Travel Time (hours) 0 Q DESIGN q SUB AREA 1 2. 3 ' 4 5 6 7 B { 9 10. (max) Area in Acres 6 Runoff Coefficient F.. r. DATE NAME DESCRIPTION BASIN NAME 4 of Sub Areas BASIN INPUT DATA Rainfall (inches) fe- r f 9/10/84 HYDROGRAPH DESIGN PROGRAM INPUT FORM Hydraulic Length (feet) /1 0 O Watershed Slope (percent 13 - / p b Travel Time (hours) 0 Q DESIGN q * * * * STORM WATER HYDROLOGY * * * * • Retention /Detention Basin Design INFLOW FROM FILE VV ABCDE INFLOW VOLUME = 156268.00 cf POND w/ SLOPED SIDES BASE = 215 x 20 SLOPE = 5 RETENTION H = 8.94 ft OUTLETS: SUBMERGED ORIFICE HEIGHT = DIAM = MAX DISCHARGE = BASIN VOL. _ BASIN DEPTH = TIME 11:40 11:50 12:00 12:10 12:20 12 :30 12:40 12:50 • -1.00 ft 14.00 in 11.26 cfs 31080.62 cf 3.52 ft INFLOW OUTFLOW cfs . cfs 0.76 0.03 6.33 1.72 18.74 6.19 27.67 8.22 26.95 9.99 15.17 11.01 9.90 11.26 8.65 11.20 )p 3f \p,,tk JOn / c e llis t ittf LP' p 0 FAt t_5' J 13:10 5.79 10.80 13:20 5.41 10.49 13:30 4.78 10.15 13:40 4.45 9.74 13:50 4.21 9.29 14:00 3.80 8.79 14:10 3.62 8.23 14:20 3.51 7.60 14:30 7.29 6.92 14:40 3.19 6.17 14:50 3.12 3.18 15:00 2.98 3.07 15:10 2.91 2.95 15:20 2.85 2.88 15:70 2.68 2.79 15:40 2.58 2.64 15:50 2.48 2.54 16 :00 2.32 2.43 16 :10 2 2.29 16:20 2.21 2.22 16 :70 2.12 2.18 16:40 2.11 2.10 16:50 2.13 2.10 17:00 2.12 2.12 17:10 2.10 2.11 17:20 2.07 2.08 17 :30. 2.00 2.05 17:40 1.96 1.98 17:50 1.92 1.94 18:00 1.83 1.89 18:10 1:77 1.81 18:20 1.71 1.75 18:30 1.61 1.67 18:40 1.59 1.59 18 :50 1.60 1.58 19 :00 1.59 1.59 19 :10 1.60 1.58 19 :20 1.61 1.59 19:30 1.60 1.61 19 :40 1.57 1.59 19 :50 1.53 1.55 ■ 20 :00 1.46 1.50 20:10 1.45 1.45 20:20 1.46 1.44 20 :30 1.45 1.45 20 :40 1.46 1.44 20 :50 1.47 1.45 21:00 1.46 1.46 21:10 1.41 1.45 21:20 1.36 1.39 21:70 1.27 1.33 21 :40 1.25 1.25 21:50 1.26 1.24 22 :00 1.25 1.25 22:10 1.25 1.24 22:20 1.26 1.24 22 :30 1.25 1.26 22 :40 1.26 1.26 22 :50 1.27 1.25 23:00 1.26 1.26 23:10 1.23 1.25 23 :20 1.17 1.20 23 :30 1.09 1.15 23 :40 1.06 1.07 23:50 1.07 1.06 24:10 0.83 1.02 24 :20 0.43 0:72 24:30 0.07 0.31 24:40 0.00 0.03 • OUTLETS: SUBMERGED ORIFICE HEIGHT = L2.00 ft DIAM = 14.00 in MAX DISCHARGE = 12.17 cfs BASIN VOL. = 27836.12 cf BASIN DEPTH = 3.27 ft TIME INFLOW OUTFLOW cfs cfs 11 :40 0.76 0.04 11:50 6.33 1.91 12:00 18.74 7.99 12:10 27.67 9.52 12:20 26.95 11.06 12:30 ' 15.17 11.97 12:40 9.90 12.17 12:50 8.65 12.06 13:00 6.64 11.87 13 :10. 5.79 11.57 13:20 5.41 11.19 13:30 4.78 10.78 13:40 4.45 • 10.27 13:50 4.21 9.70 14:0• 3.80 9.04 14:10 3.62 8.23 14:20 3.51 2.88 14:30 3.29 3.41 14 :40 3.19 3.27 14:50 302 3.14 15:00 2.98 3.07 15:10 2.91 2,94 t4 t HO • 1 u! LLB r. 11“ 15:30 2.68 2.78 15:40 2.58 2.64 15 :50 . 2.48 2.53 16:00 2.32 2.42 16:10 2.25 2.28 16:20 2.21 x.22 16:30 2.12 2.18 16:40 2.11 2.10 16:50 2.13 2.09 17:00 2.12 2.12 17:10 2.10 2.11 17:20 2.07 2.07 17:30 2.00 2.04 17:40 1.96 1.97 17:50 1.92 1.94 18 :00 1.83 1.89 18:10 1.77 1.80 18:20 1.71 1.74 18:30 1.61 1.67 18:40 1.59 1.58 18:50 1.60 1.57 19:00 1.59 1.60 19:10 1.60 1.59 19:20 1.61 1.59 19:30 1.60 1.61 19:40 1.57 1.59 19:50 1.53 1.54 20:00 1.46 1.50 20:10 1.45 1.44 20:20 1.46 1.44 20:30 1.45 1.45 20:40 1.46 1.44 20:50 1.47 1.44 21:00 1.46 1.47 21:10 1.41 1.45 21:20 1.36 1.38 21:30 1.27 1.33 21:40 1.25 1.25 21:50 1.26 1.24 22:00 1.25 1.26 22:10 1.25 1.24 22:20 1.26 1.25 22:30 1.25 1.26 22:40 1.26 1.25 - '2:50 1.27 1.26 23 :00 1.26 1.26 23:10 1.23 1.25 23:20 1.17 1.20 23:30 1.09 1.15 23 :40 1.06 1.06 23:50 1.07 1.06 24:00 1.06 1.06 24:10 0.83 1.01 24:20 0.43 0.70 24:30 0.07 0.29 24:40 0.00 0.02 * * ** STORM WATER HYDROLOGY * * ** Retention /Detention Basin Design INFLOW FROM FILE VV ABODE INFLOW VOLUME = 156268.00 cf POND w/ SLOPED SIDES BASE = 215 x 20 SLOPE = 5 RETENTION H = 8.94 ft OUTLETS: SUBMERGED ORIFICE HEIGHT = DIAM = 0.00 ft 14.00 in MAX DISCHARGE = 10.35 cfs BASIN VOL. = 35281.42 cf BASIN DEPTH = 3.81 ft TIME INFLOW OUTFLOW cfs cfs 11:40 11:50 12:00 12: 10 12:20 12:30 12:40 12:50 13:00 13:10 13:20 13:30 13:40 13:50 14:00 14:10 14:20 14:30 • 14 :40 14:50 15:00 • 15:10 15:20 15:.30 15 :40 0.76 6.33 18.74 27.67 26.95 15.17 9.90 8.65 6.64 5.79 5.41 4.78 4.45 4.21 3.80 3.62 3.51 3.29 3.19 .12 2.9B 2.91 2.85 2.68 2.58 n An 0.02 1.09 4.01 6.85 8.88 10.02 10.34 10.33 10.23 10.03 9.77 9.48 9.16 8.79 8.41 7.98 7.52 7.03 6.51 5.98 5.44 4.90 4.39 3.93 3.48 _ 16:00 • 2.82 16:10 2.25 2.58 16:20 2.21 2.42 16:30 2.12 2.31 16 :40' 2.11 2.20 16:50 2.13 2.12 17:00 2.12 2.12 17:10 2.10 2.11 17:20 2.07 2.09 17:30 2.00 2.06 17:40 1.96 2.00 17:50 1.92 1.95 18:00 1.83 1.91 18:10 1.77 1.84 18:20 1.71 1.77 18:30 1.61 1.70 18:40 1.59 1.62 18:50 1.60 1.59 19:00 1.59 1.59 19:10 1.60 1.59 19:20 1.61 1.59 19:30 1.60 1.60 19:40 1.57 1.60 19:50 1.53 1.56 20:60 1.46 1.52 20:10 1.45 1.47 20:20 1.46 1.45 20:30 1.45 1.45 20:40 1.46 1.44 20:50 1.47 1.45 21:00 1.46 1.46 21:10 1.41 1.45 21:20 1.36 1.41 21:30 1.27 1.35 21:40 1.25 1.28 21:50 1.26 1.25 22:00 1.25 1.25 22:10 1.25 1.25 22:20 1.26 1.25 22:30 1.25 1.25 22 :40 1.26 1.25 22:50 1.27 1.25 23:00 1.26 1.26 23:10 1.23 1.25 23:20 1.17 1.22. 23:30 1.09 1.17 23:40 1.06 1.10 23:50 1.07 1.07 24:00 1.06 1.06 24:10 0.83 1.04 24:20 0.43 0.8 24:30 0.07 0.46 24:40 0.00 0.13 24:50 0.00 0.02 SUB AREA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (max) Area in Acres Runoff Coefficient 64 DATE NAME DESCRIPTION BASIN NAME # of Sub Areas BASIN INPUT DATA Rainfall (inches) Hydraulic Length (feet) 1/0 49 Watershed Slope (percent /3.6 r / Travel Time (hours) ' S 9/10/84 CT s oil /set ve, /// vi V UA � — 13eloet / V 6n3, 6 1 1, 7 9 V 093 /0 q00/@ uct HYDROGRAPH DESIGN PROGRAM INPUT FORM DESIGN Q /3 p /300 1' /3o ycc 3 1° NON STD . -GRATE AREA // Q STREET CROSS SLOPE FT /FT MANNINGS "N" STREET GRADE CONTINUOUS GRADE OR SUMP (C /S) STA COUNTY STANDARD GRATE (Y /N) 7,q-t. .v 2 r , 0 • 0/.6 .0 /551 /551 Y . o9J ,. 9/6 -008 C / /2�3 . Y 3 7 z ° 25 , 0/6 - o32 3 s 73 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NON STD . -GRATE AREA // WIDTH LENGTH BAR DEPTH DESCRIPTION (:1-6 f J ,p; 11 OF AREAS DATE NAME ( � . N L< PROJECT 1 /A / . L S 1� V I CAA �S "GRATE PROGRAM" INPUT FORM DRAINAGE GRATE DESIGN 1 OY-,SI P r -oe,"- V Co. Std. Grate P (3 sides) = 1.7 + 1.5 + 1.7 = 4.9' A = 1.45 Sq. Ft. l/ 1 U e SUMP AREA // PERIMETER AREA AVAIL- ABLE HEAD Std. Curb H.W. _ .67' `e By Date Sub, DR I # c R Ck_Cv (-4 \/4, 1- --=-( Y (S E LESLIE D. KILLINSSWERTH, P.E. WEST 4111 ; SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99208 PhONE: (509) 325 -2190 y Job No. RIiCEIvEu MAR 141984 S?OrANE COUNTY ENGINEER Sheet of By Low Date 3111-14 Subject .< y,L LSThT Job No. 12S Sheet I of \S STr r a c �.� C� +co I 0 i C Ei-TI 2E 2oPO 4..1 - M) 4 d = aE _ 5 3, x to(oZ - I O �II� L = _SIB r"- (1 06 L)(o, 4) (0,15) vO.00oS i_.= IZ.3 rt., o�z - o, ocosq z v CerZ__ 10 '-( C7c . ST - Ole �= 1 / l +2 Q. CIA Q = (o,3)( 1, g(0)( 3 7,s %2-) ( 43560 q o, S I cog 2.S Por )i-TO \ St4rj PO op D2ty 2. Pot 0S f Sm St 4 5 —d- I Ce-\-„ru 2oso(4 Ad = 40 >< 2-2 _0 = S S' FT Z- 1_= zzo L E = z.o-1 o — znco7 = 3 F� 3 = , ZZO - Q.° 1 -ca, ((z-.0)(0,4o - tc.= o1S L Vo,D13v t - 7, qcl m‘M _ c " Hea- 37 a 2. 7_OGe.) - - 10 J O. CoO f� = 0 $15 S — Pot O. Ca0 or O. Cno , L = lo�Z or)c) c c tom ghs �� M 1 t-.Tl. -.s i7 z -r 5 6 to tit tea{ E7 Q = CI La (0.3 )(2.C) 435G0 �� 1 z 2 St i } +4 By LoIL Date Subjec. ' =wa -. � t om; m, CS"TT• -� ` - -Job No. i ? °S Sheet Z of 16 3 . Poi e.a De VG H j + Zo -b- S ± 4 4. p, = 4o ‘12.-5 11 c S LE= zce Zoro = S Co LS' S = o •o 1 3Z 4 z� LL = 0 , ICj �(425)(o,4��O,GO \fo,or3Z t G = I I, el L o 2. 1 1 1-4 Q = CIA o ,z3 Cf Po o ao2a- X vc l I -k O --;' S - + - t A o = 2_1 1 2.0 r-r z- L= 540 LSE = zoc= t,4 — 2.05Z = q ,44 Fr so = o .15 _ (o3)C z,o)( 11 /4350) 94_ • O , o I 1Z 54 8 948 Xo o! vo,on J = 1.95 �lr -t 0 (0,3o)(I ,pZ.° /435Go) Q = 0, - a44 CF . — Per { ti s t ip__ Pb � D21Ve 3 +iiS cJ i�Z A o = - l obo Y-rZ J = za54- — ZoSZ 2. G = -j = 0 i l 3 tc.= o • IS ('(i )(o ,4-) o 4.0 L _ 10 L= 4ZS L= z•4 h..)(4-12. By Lo(C Date5112464Sub, VALc \/(474 Q = C-1G (p,3o)(z. 0 , 1 - 7 c . PS ?tit' I I °�' ST7.. S t l Z Co, Po,. -. 05�- 2 0 t=a0 - o toe -' - 3 +ci S A 0 = t(01 I L= 403 zoS4 -- 2-o4Co = S = 403 = o, o I R r o, �o , �)3 r6T t 0,15 t Io Q- cl,4 _ (0.30 (z.z >(I6,I�o/43,5%0) R = o, z*4 ca=s #t &- S S t 4S Do o -oCWS ti So , -•-n-; / Q = 0,51 ct=5 Q - O, I SLI -5 / = 0,0"10 ccror = 0 , SSSGFS l io = z.Z IUf -12 Job No. I' Sheet 3 of 1 C (2�,ss 5(opt =O.OZS DATE = 3/12/84 DESIGNER= LES KILLINGSWORTH DESCRIPTION= NO ;1 SOUTH STATION OF GRATE= 1120 "-CONTINUOUS GRADE ,;,STANDARD, GRATE .... STATION OF'GRAT.E= 000 CONTINUOUS GRADE STANDARD GRATE DRAINAGE GRATE DESIGN':. DRAINAGE'GRATE DESIGN DATE = 3/12/84. DESIGNER= LES :KILLINGSWORTH DESCRIPTION= NO 3 SOUTH DRAINAGE GRATE DESIGN DATE =3 /1 2./84 DESIGNER= LES KILLINGSWORTH DESCRIPTION= VALLEY VISTA 0= .122 PROJECT= VALLEY VISTA STATION OF GRATE= 1545 0= .535 N= .016 8= .0136 .XS= .025 CONTINUOUS GRADE GUTTER FLOW = .59 CFS STANDARD GRATE 0 INTERCEPTED = .43 CFS Q BYPASS = .16 CFS 0= .12 N= .016 •8 .0132 XS= .025 %GUTTER FLOW= .28 CFS Q -INTERCEPTED': .24 CFS O BYPASS = .03.CFS STATION OF GRATE= 572 Q= - . 147 N= .016 S= .0172 XS= .025 SUMP GUTTER FLOW = .18 CFS CO. STANDARD GRATE GRATE CAPACITY = 7.22 CFS INDETERMINATE FLOW PROJECT= VALLEY VISTA STATION OF GRATE= 572 0= .0585 N= .016 S= .0113 XS= .025 SUMP GUTTER FLOW = .06 CFS CO. STANDARD GRATE GRATE CAPACITY = 7.22 CFS INDETERMINATE' FLOW `._PROJECT= VALLEY VISTA N= .016 S= .0199 XS= .025 GUTTER FLOW = .12 CFS - O INTERCEPTED = .12 CFS O BYPASS = -. CFS - ma 1 2 1984 PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) ***************************************************************************+*** PROJECT:VALLEY.VISTA ESTATES • DRAINAGE BASIN: A • •STORM EVENT FREQUENCY: 50 YEARS. • • CONDITIONS: ULTIMATE (2/ACRE) DEVELOPMENT DRi1NAGEARE r ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER SLOPE • 7.3 HYDRALULIC LENGTH 1300 FEET • PRECIPITATION 2.4 _INCHES RESULTING RUNOFF 11 . I 33 CFS -- A g ******* ** **************************************4*********4 PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) PROJECT: VALLEY VISTA ESTATES DRAINAGE BASIN: STORM EVENT FREQUENCY: 50 YEARS CONDITIONS: ULTIMATE (2/ACRE) DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA 13 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER SLOPE 10.7 -7: HYDRALULIC LENGTH' 1350 FEET PRECIPITATION- • 2.4 INCHES RESULTING RUNOFF 7.397 CFS -a- D ntHes PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) 4*************** PROJECT: VALLEY VISTA ESTATES DRAINAGE BASIN: C STORM EVENT FREQUENni: 50 YEARS CONDITIONS: ULTIMATE (2/ACRE) DEVELOPMENT -,DRAINAGE AREA 13.5 ACRES t RUNOFF- CURVE NUMBER 73 . • • SLOPE 11.8 HYDRALULIC LENGTH 1350 FEET • PRECIPITATION • 2.4 • INCHES RESULTING RUNOFF 3e486 CFS Fja. +******* *7 � *********** • PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) ****************************.**********************�**. PROJECT VALLEY VISTA ESTATES ' DRAINAGE BASIN: D � STORM EVENT FREQUENCY: 58 • YEARS � CONDITIONS: ULTIMATE (2/ACRE) DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA 31.6 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 73 SLOPE 11.6 % HYDRALULIC LENGTH 215@ FEET PRECIPITATION 2.4 INCHES RESULTING RUNOFF .16^454 CFS Dt+ + ) L 7~ .***************** :************************************** PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) ****************************************** '''^'******************************+. PROJECT: VALLEY VISTA ESTATES DRAINAGE BASIN: E STORM EVENT FREQUENCY: 50 YEARS CONDITIONS: ULTIMATE l2/ACRE) DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER � 73 SLOPE. 13.6 % HYDRALULIC LENGTH ---- 11.80 FEET PRECIPITATION 2.4 INCHES RESULTING RUNOFF . 4.519 CFP Da | ********************************* *************- *********************. 4 s • • .B t • t ..1.°9 c7.7 SS co Z. GO I q.6 H i it (2.9,1 Fre:'3. 99_ Zo44 z64&.47 ' 42-0Sei:Er, tc• SO. Co, I • a.04 4.0 s , ; 2°55, tos3. 00 •■ " ; So 72 ,LS 2_647 SO, z. *IL ; :v• • • . ? _ jq t I ; :IF 2P12..•00 --". • 2hor.s, 1, so 1 - 1 0 o .00E30 • - z4E3o - :•zb.e;Pit 7 • G„, , 7,0 Sa;,, C.e, • 7-055r ' --• l • Co 4 , • , • 1 ; ' I , i , • ; , ' ' i 1 • 1 ' - , ='2Q j5is JSo_ : , ':: 1 '. Z C 71:9" 20 ;(:I;H i i . 41 ii.. I ---;-----; - --r-----'-' ------ • --- --t - - ' - -- ' : 1* ' ' s-s: } • 1 ; --1. I . -ccfi ' S ' .e'r. °Q.. 11-35 : ' Is...*19:21 .._., „ • . • 0,0084 • oith J • - ; • -•• t .1 I. • ., , I • ; LJ • c I + • 30 3 I Col -7 4cLt__ • --■ 9t . .62:33 - 71+ TT r i r b;1 •- H T l 'i ' . --- 4.:7 . i ± - !, 74 . - 1 4- 1 - "I't + ' ; 1 t --. ';', . i . . i , 1 ! , ' • • i ..... •, ..., _4.... .4.--....-- ss-is ,- , Tr ... ., • 4 's • . I .L' i t 7 " L' '' -' •''il i .,, . .!--.4...1 t• k ..n. S. .... i s.,....-:t..-4...‘j- l s:-.. , ;- 4 4-.-4.--4-ts . ". 4 -7- . - '-r 1 ,. - --7+--- • ' ! - : i i 1 t ' ' • •;• • t . 1' + ' • - S i ; ; . • t, i 1 ) . 1 - 1 I '. -: , , 1 - s ; • t • t s t_. I. 4 : • , ; : , -. 1 -- ,, --1",-t-t- -,.. , r F - 1 • :r- .• ;:- _L __ ..-- • 1._ f . : i . t I 1 I. i' j I. .7 ' l' t . , . ■ " ;. 3. 4 . . S-. ........ ...„ ' - L.-•+-.-- -i- •-t --- -4---.4 ...-- ----......a.. ....... -......i...-.... f i / .4 ,* . s .,, .....s. . ' ,. , 4. _.1 _S .___ s • s I . — , , . .'• s ■ 3 i . .......4 ,... 11 i -...... 1........ ...-... ,.,.. i 7.0 ' • Z ... t 1 I ....... • 1 ■ 1 Z. I 1 • I . I I I t I I t j I P I I • I I I . •I OPEN FLOW ******************************** DITCH 1 ' INPUT DATA 0= 17.7 CFS L= 400' FEET S= .0125 FEET/FOOT n = .03 OUTPUT CRITICAL SLOPE (Sc)- .017 FT/FT VELOCITY (V) 4.026 FPS CRITICAL VEL�(Vc) 4.469 FPS DEPTH (D) .911 FEET CRITICAL DEPTH (Dc)- "845 FEET TRAVEL TIME (Tt)^`-` ,1.656 MIN. TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL 8= 3 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= . 2 :r ****************************** OPEN CHANNEL FLOW ******************************** DITCH 2 INPUT DATA: ,8= 24.2 CFS L= 168 FEET S= .0125 FEET/FOOT � n. .03 OUTPUT ' ` CRITICAL SLOPE'/(Sc)- .016 FT/FT VELOCITY (V) 4.347 FPS cRlTlCAL uEL,(c.c) 4.746 FPS DFPTH (D) 1.009 FEET ' CRITICAL DEPTH (�c(Dc) ^946 FEET TRAVEL TIME (Tt) .613 MIN. TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL 8= 3.5 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 . Rt SS= 2 :1 ******************************** OPEN CHANNEL FLOW ******************************** DITCH 3 INPUT DATA: , 0= 38 CFS L= 270 FEET 5= .0148� FEET/FOOT n= ,83 CRITICAL SLOPE (Sc)- VELOCITY. (V) CRITICAL VEL.(Vc) DEPTH CD) CRITICAL DEPTH (7Dc)- TRAVEL TIME (Tt)-~ TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL S= 4 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 ******************************** OPEN CHANNEL FLOW ******************************** DITCH 4 INPUT DATA: • 0= 31.6 CFS L= 170 FEET .0082 FEET/FOOT - n= .03 _ OUTPUT - � CRITICAL SL8PE(Sc)- .015 FT/FT VELOCITY (V) 4.888 FPS CRITICAL VEL.(Vc) 4.995 FPS DEPTH (D) ^ 1^286 FEET CRITICAL DEPTH (Dc)-6 1.840 FEET TRAVEL TIME (Tt)- .693 MIN. TRAPEZOIDAL' CHANNEL 6 — Lt R� 4 ft SS= 2 :1 SS= 2 :1 OUTPUT ^0,15 FT/FT 4^848 FPS 4.934 FPS 1.025 FEET 1.818 FEET .930 MIN. ******************************** (Vie ' .^~ . 1 2 1984 • OPEN CHANNEL FLOW * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DITCH 5 INPUT DATA: 0= 20 CFS L= 280 FEET ' 3= .0089 FEET, FOOT n= .03 TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL 8= 3 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL 8= 3 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 OUTPUT CRITICAL SLOPE (Sc)- .01.6 FT /FT VELOCITY (V) .3.702 FP, CRITICAL VEL.(Vc) 4.598 FPS DEPTH (D) 1.056 FEET CRITICAL DEPTH (Dc)- .905 FEET TRAVEL TIME (Tt) 1.260 MIN. * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** OPEN CHANNEL FLOW DITCH A INPUT DATA 0= 11.1 CFS L= 300 FEET S= .0227 FEET/ FOOT n= :03'• OUTPUT CRITICAL SLOPE (Sc)- .018 FT /FT • VELOCITY (V) . . 4.333 FPS CRITICAL VEL.(Vc) '4.002 FPS DEPTH (D) .608 FEET CRITICAL DEPTH (Dc)- .646 FEET TRAVEL TIME (Tt) 1:154 M1N. 0 /18 MAR 1 2 1984 8= Lt Rt SS� OPEN CHANNEL FLOW *********'*********************** DITCH 8 INPUT DATA: 0=:11^1 CFS L= 48' FEET . D= .0725 FEET/FOOT n = .03 OUTPUT CRITICAL SLOPE (Sc)— VELOCITY (V) CRITICAL VEL,(Vc) DEPTH (D) CRITICAL DEPTH (Dc)— TRAVEL TIME(Tt)~—~^ TRAFEZO[DAL CHANNEL ft 2 :1 2 :1- . 01? 6.496 4�@2 . 440 . 646 . 103 FT/FT FPS FPS FEET FEET MIN. ******************************** OPEN CHANNEL FLOW ******************************** DITCH C INPUT DATA: Q= .5 CFS L= 40 FEET S= .01 FEET/FOOT n = .03 OUTPUT -�, ^ ` CRITICAL SLOPE.(Sc)— .030 VELOCITY (V) 1.189 CRITICAL VEL,(Vc) 1.685 DEPTH (0) ^129 CRITICAL DEPTH (Dd).= ` .093 TRAVEL TIME (Tt)-~-;— .561 TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL' S= 3 Lt SS= Rt SS= ft 2 :1 2 :1 FT/FT FPS FPS FEET* FEET. MIN. ******************************** ' �t-r - 1 - zzo��� Ti2 , 4 ����_ ft :A ' 'c~^ � NAR.l2 1984 .OPEN CHANNEL FLOW ******************************** DITCH C--` INPUT DATA; O= .5 CFS � L= 40 FEET � � . S= .01 FEET/FOOT OUTPUT • CRITICAL SLOPE (Sc)— VELOCITY (V) CRITICAL VEL^(Vc) : DEPTH (D) CRITICAL DEPTH (Dc)— TRAVEL TIME (Tt) VEE CHANNEL He= 0 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 ******************************** OPEN CHANNEL FLOW ******************************". DITCH C �. INPUT DATA: O=. .5 CFS L= 40 FEET ,. S= .01 FEET/FOOT n= .03 OUTPUT CRITICAL SLOPE (Sc>: VELOCITY (V) ' CRlTlCAL .(Vc)-7— '' ' DEPTH (D> ` '' .� CRITICAL DEPTH«(Dc)— TRAVEL TIME (Tt) TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL B= 1 ft Lt SS/ 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 " FT/FT . 338 FPS FPS . ▪ G68 FEET (DK_ T1,T' .043 FEET 1.974 MIN. . 027 1.502 2.111 .229 . 175 .444 ********************************' FT/FT FPS FPS . / FEET FEET MIN. /��/ ^~y|s MAR 12 1984 � i3a-r'`=1=^9 ` 'OPEN CHANNELFLOW' . ******************************** DITCH D INPUT DATA: 0= 7.4. CFS L= 280 FEET` . 8= ,8985 FEET/FOOT n= .93 • OUTPUT CRITICAL SLOPE (Sc.)- ' .01? FT/FT VELOCITY (V) 6^834 FPS cRlTICAL VEL.(Vc) 3.771 FPS DEPTH (D) .390 FEET CRITICAL DEPTH (Dc)- .618 FEET TRAVEL TIME (Tt)-^~' ,488 MIN. TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL 8= 2 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 ******************************** OPEN' CHANNEL FLOW ************:******************* DITCH D INPUT DATA: 0= 7.4 CFS L= 200 FEET 8= .0985 FEET/FOOT n= .03 • OUTPUT CRITICAL SLOPE (Sc?— .019 FT/FT.'.. VELOCITY' ^7^174 CRITlCAL:VLc)-� 3.892 FPS DEPTH .510 FEET CRITICAL DEPTH (Dc)- .757 FEET TRAVEL TIME (Tt)-7� .465 MIN.- . � . TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL . E= l ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 . �;• - • ************ |M mAR12 1984 OPEN CHANNEL FLOW ******************************** DITCH E INPUT DATA: 0= 7.4 CFS L= 90 FEET. • S= .0233 FEET/FOOT n= .03 • OUTPUT CRITICAL SLOPE (Sc.)— .019 FT/FT VELOCITY (V) • 3.370 FPS CRITICAL VEL.(Vc) 3.618 FPS DEPTH (D) .482 FEET CRITICAL DEPTH (Dc)— .509 FEET TRAVEL TIME .(Tt) .388 MIN. • TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL 8= 3 ft Lt S8= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :I- ******************************** — - OPEN CHANNEL FLOW ******************************** DITCH E • • INPUT DATA: Q= 7.4 CFS L= 90 'FEET • S= .0233 FEET/FOOT n= .03 OUTPUT . . CRITICAL SCOPE(Sc)— .019 FT/FT VELOCITY- (V) • 4.099 FPS CRITICAL VEL.(Vc)--7 3.771 FPS • DEPTH (D) .574 FEET CRITICAL DEPTH (DE), .610 FEET TRAVEL TIME .366 MIN. TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL 8=. 2 ft • Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 - o MAR. 1 2 1984 OPEN . CHANNEL FLOW *************t****************t* DITCH F INPUT DATA: 0= 8.7, CFS L= 330 FEET S= ^1 ,FEET/FCIOT n= .03 OUTPUT CRITICAL SLOPE <Sc)— .019 FT/FT VELOCITY (V) 7.209 FPS CRITICAL VEL^(Vc)--` 3^9}3 .FPS DEPTH (D) • .424 CRITICAL DEPTH (Dc)— .667 FEET TRAVEL TIME (Tt) .763 MIN. TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL | 8: 2 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= .2 :t ******************************** • ``` OPEN CHANNEL FLOW ******************************** ' DITCH G INPUT DATA: 0= 8^7 CFS I.= 130 FEET 8= .0123 FEET/FOOT n = .03 2- OUTPUT CRITICAL SLp .018 FT/FT VELOCITY (V) 3.403 FPS CRITICAL VEL^(Vc) 3.913 FPS DEPTH (D) ` - .736 FEET. CRITICAL DEPTH (Dc).7 .667 FEET TRAVEL TIME (T�)� ` .637 MIN. TRAPEZOIDAL* CHANNEL B= 2 ft LtSS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 ******************************** MAR. 1 2 1984 , OPEN CHANNEL FLOW . ****************************** INPUT DATA: 0= 16.4 CF • L= 150 FEET 6- .185 FEET/FOOT n= .03' -- � OUTPUT CRITICAL SLOPE (Sc)' .017 FT/FT VELOCITY (V) � 8.808 FPS CRITlCAL,VEL.(Vc)--- 4-514 FPS DEPTH (D) .587 FEET CRITICAL DEPTH (Dc)- .938 FEET TRAVEL TIME (Tt) .284 MIN. TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL 8= 2 fl Lt SS= 2:1 Rt SS= 2:1 ******************************** OPEN CHANNEL FLOW ********************************' � ` DITCH J�� � .. = INPUT DATAt i d 17 CFS L= 120 FEET;, 8= .0113 FEET/FOOT n= .03 - OUTPUT - TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL ' 8= 3 ft Lt SS= 2 :1. Rt S8= 2 :1 ******************************** ` � CRITICAL SLOPE (Sc)- .01? FT/FT VELOCITY (�/> 3^840 FPS CRITlCAUVE (Vc>-`� 4.428 DEPTH (D) : ` ^91� FEET m:--(Dc;,- �� ' ` � .�. CRITICAL DEPTH-:,82a FEET . TRAVEL TIME (TUT '.521 MIN. • , u'// � �^ Ma 2 1984 OPEN CHANNEL FLOW DITCH H 1 INPUT.DATA: • Q= 16.4 CFS • L= 150 FEET • S= .105 - FEET/FOOT n= .03 OUTPUT CRITICAL SLOPE (Sc)- VELOCITY (V) CRITICAL VEL'.(Vc) DEPTH <D) CRITICAL DEPTH (Dc)- TRAVELTIME(Tt) TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL 5= 3 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= '2 i1' .017 FT/FT 3.325 FPS 4.390 FPS . 494 FEET .809 FEET . 300 •MIN. *********************** ' OPEN CHANNEL FLOW **********4****i***************** DITCH I INPUT DATA: , • Q= 16.4 CFS • L= 75 FEET ' 3= .1 FEET/FOOT n= .03 .. ' .- OUTPUT , : CRITICAL SLOPE .01,7, FT/FT. • -,. :. VELOCITY (V) , . 0:185 FPS CRITICAL VEL,(Vc) , 4.390• FPS e•-•:;:j "! DEPTH (D) T, 1:' .. ..501, FEET'.-.• - - CRITICAL DERTH .*.>4, .qg9, FEET--',YL' TRAVEL TIMEi(Tt)77-7 .1•53 MIN.i. • ' 2•-:; TRAPEZOIDAL:CHANNEL; :,, • .., ' . _ . ****:**************************** 8=-. 3 :.t';1 -P\ 1-r%) .; . . t — Lt SS= 2 :1 • Rt SS= 2 :1 / / \ ....2/ \ � / / \ ��� \ / _ \ \ , ' 'V 2 \\ \ ‘ ‘ j 1 / , // //% // / • // / /�/ / A v r. SUBJECT VA."--c-e. --e `� f� �. t✓ST� 2mr�,..�. .�rS D.�.. -�� De 4\ /IS. OPrto r� try DE�/EZ -ct�Z 51 'f'c ��1c' -- 5! F..c..� f&( - ? >� ^�.or -+..�. LP�o w✓`S Rene. y .._ 1 DEN ct.-cpx i cia r'.42 "!1 re- O 1 JccnV€ > Rct. 4 Ot-- 1 &• co 2 - 4-o-t c 4- c.' e 4.°j BASIN VOL -C.F.? 40,764.8080 RUN DEPTH? 4.3:008 RUN S- SLOPE? 5.8800 RUM W/L RATIO? .2400 RUM FREEBOARD? 1.0000 RUH RUN UTOP= 257.0944 W /TUP= 61.7827 L/BOT= 214.8944 WlOT= 18.7827 L/FBD= 267.8944 W/F8Ir71.7017 S- SLOPE? R!IH RUN RUN RUN RUN BASIN VOL- C.F.? 40,764.8080 f !j RUIN DEPTH? 4.3000 RUN 3.0000 RUN W/L RATIO? .2888 RUN FREEBOARD? 1.8000 RUN L/TOP= 213.9497 RUN W /TOP= 59.9859 RUN L /ROT = 188.1497 RUH W/BOT= 34.1859 RUN L/FED =210 9 RtM W/FBD=65.9059 401 N JJECT NO 83 -- IZg: , BY 1 -.: 7 - DATE I I /24/Al- SHEET NO OF I ��-- -T Z Fs-cc Pc «� (97 Z L ) S) Poi-c carr .'\ 24 Fa. all 1 i z-4 3' I I I; I( I 1. b 3 v -� ,:_:_: :hf!_ 3 r r a7..° t....a, --v j I I.., j l zs1' 1 S. zc...—,' al l ' - SUBJECT VA."--c-e. --e `� f� �. t✓ST� 2mr�,..�. .�rS D.�.. -�� De 4\ /IS. OPrto r� try DE�/EZ -ct�Z 51 'f'c ��1c' -- 5! F..c..� f&( - ? >� ^�.or -+..�. LP�o w✓`S Rene. y .._ 1 DEN ct.-cpx i cia r'.42 "!1 re- O 1 JccnV€ > Rct. 4 Ot-- 1 &• co 2 - 4-o-t c 4- c.' e 4.°j BASIN VOL -C.F.? 40,764.8080 RUN DEPTH? 4.3:008 RUN S- SLOPE? 5.8800 RUM W/L RATIO? .2400 RUM FREEBOARD? 1.0000 RUH RUN UTOP= 257.0944 W /TUP= 61.7827 L/BOT= 214.8944 WlOT= 18.7827 L/FBD= 267.8944 W/F8Ir71.7017 S- SLOPE? R!IH RUN RUN RUN RUN BASIN VOL- C.F.? 40,764.8080 f !j RUIN DEPTH? 4.3000 RUN 3.0000 RUN W/L RATIO? .2888 RUN FREEBOARD? 1.8000 RUN L/TOP= 213.9497 RUN W /TOP= 59.9859 RUN L /ROT = 188.1497 RUH W/BOT= 34.1859 RUN L/FED =210 9 RtM W/FBD=65.9059 401 N JJECT NO 83 -- IZg: , BY 1 -.: 7 - DATE I I /24/Al- SHEET NO OF I ��-- -T Z Fs-cc Pc «� (97 Z L ) S) Poi-c carr .'\ 24 Fa. all 1 i z-4 3' I I I; I( I 1. b 3 v 12/31/84 LDK ' ********************* VALLEY VISTA ESTATES DITCH SCHEDULE # # # # # * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * ** DITCH Q(cfs) LENGTH BOTTOM ELEV. UPPER LOWER 11.1 300' 2058.00 6051.20 v B 11.1 15' 2050.40 2047.50 0.5 5' 2049.40 2049.00 D 7.4 200' 2077.00 01057.30 ✓E 7.4 40' ng 20 10 f 2052.62 F 8.7 330' 2058.00 vG 8.7 40' 2055.60 2055.20 H 16.4 150' 2- 2083.80 v2068.06 v I 16.4 75' 2067.26 v2064.00 ,/J 17.0 35' 2062.40 v2061.40 ,,1 17.7 405' ✓2061.40 2055.20 v2 24.2 205' 2055.20 2052.62 3 30.0 287' 2052.62 2049.00 .4/ 31.6 177' 2t 00- 2047.50 v5" 20.0 256' ? '046.40 2043.90 DROP SLOPE 6.80' 0.0227 3.0 2.50' 0.166, 0.40' 0.0800 1.0 19.70' 0.0985 1.0 2.48' 0.0620 2.0 34.00' 0.1030 2.0 0.40' 0.0100 2.0 15.74' 0.1049 2.0 3.26' 0.0435 3.0 1.00' 0.0286 3.0 6.20' 0.0153 3.0 2.58' 0.0126 3.5 3.62' 0.0126 4.0 1.50' 0.0085 4.0 2.50' 0.0098 3.0 " " 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.0 2.5 .* * * * * * * * * * * * *,; * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** GENERAL NOTES * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 1. Fill material shall be well-graded, free of organic matter and shall have a maximum particle size of 4- inches in diameter. Construction shall be in accordance with Compaction Method "C ", Section 13 -3 of APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, latest edition. 2. Hydroseed all disturbed ground with crested wheatgrass. 3. Rip -rap shall be hand - placed at culvert outlets and on all ditch channels as per sections 8- 15.3(3) and 9 -13.2 of the STATE OF WASHINGTON STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, latest edition. 4. All metal parts and surfaces in the Flow Restrictor structure shall be made of corrosion - resistant material or galvanized steel. All welds shall be protected from corrosion and leakage. All welds shall conform to W.S.H.S. 9 -06 -54 STATE OF WASHINGTON STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, latest edition. All welds shall be painted with rust inhibitor paint "GALVICON" or approved equivalent. 5. Provide a steel ladder to the bottom of the Flow Restrictor structure. Permenantly fix to the wall of the 6 -feet diameter C.M.P. with bolted angle iron bracket at the top of the structure. 6. Weld a 30 -inch diameter C.M.P. to the inside of the 6 -feet diameter C.M.P. to serve as an overflow and to contain the control orifice. Welds shall be 2- inches long with a minimum cross section of 1/4 -inch using 6011 rod or better. 7. Weld 1/4 -inch steel plate with a 14 -inch diameter control orifice to the bottom of the 30 -inch C.M.P. overflow structure at the elevation shown in the drawing on this sheet. 8. The base for the Flow Restrictor structure shall be an 8 -feet square concrete pad, 8- inches thick. The 6 -feet diameter C.M.P. shall be embedded 4- inches into the base. 9. The cover for the flow restrictor shal be 6' -6" diameter 1/4 -inch checkered steel plate. The hatch shall be of the same material with an opening of 2 -feet by 2 -feet with an approved locking device. DEVELOPER APPROVAL: Date: V.& ..a \/ctirp. L.oic. (z.f 'b1( w DITCH CALCULATIONS ' A S= .0227 ft /ft Sc= 1.31851000205E -2 ft /ft V= 4.32494513143 fps Vc= 3.59724670956 fps D= .608585026433 ft Dc= .700981268057 ft 0= 11.1 cfs. L= 300 ft: I% n= .03 Tt= 1.15608403068 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 3 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 vA J lsrp. asri' • Corr D ITCH CALCULATIONS 8 S= .1667 ft /ft Sc= 1.31851000205E -2 ft /ft V= 8.627515199 fps Vc 3.597246709 fps D= .3480849995 ft Dc= .700981268 ft 0= 11.1 cfs L= 15 ft n= .03 Tt= 2.89770570338E -2 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL 8= 3 f t Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 V A.L.ac. VV,V IsTA- » LAK. I7-(31( JAL.. \/fan esThe f LAIC l2(1(e4 51 -1-1-1 110 DITCH CALCULATIONS ° C " DITCH CALCULATIONS D S= .08 ft /ft 5= .0985 ft /ft Sc= 9.18552310204E -3 ft /ft Sc= 1.36933404213E -2 ft /ft V= 3.01352536955 fps V= 7.15960647898 fps Vc= 1.44774537057 fps Vc= 3.459 08174892 fps D= .131391288403 ft D= .511109834223 ft Dc= - .234955977096 ft Dc= .814024452849 ft Q= .5 cfs ` Q= 7.4 cfs L= 5 ft i L= 200 ft n= 03 t n= .03 Tt= 2.76531049565E -2 min Tt= .465574936712 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL' B= 1 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 B= 1 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 LAS 1-7-( 1(84- DITCH CALCULATIONS EE S= .062 ft /ft Sc= .012793043263 ft /ft V= 5.79605709164 fps Vc= 3.28714631901 fps D= .442531167937 ft D= .421023267485 ft Dc= .728077100849 ft Dc= .672858210036 ft - Q= 7.4 .cfs L= 40 ft n= .03 Tt= .115020721178 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 2 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 Lc 12.(3119.11- «( DITCH CALCULATIONS F S= .103 ft /ft Sc= 1.30083490175E - 2 ft /ft V= 7.27079618269 fps Vc= 3.4573931692 fps 0= 8.7 cfs L= 330 f t n= .03 ' Tt= .756450856523 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL 8= 2 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 1z.f31fe4 L124C DITCH CALCULATIONS "G S= _ .01 ft /ft Sc= 1.30083490175E -2 ft /ft V= 3.14949084862 fps Vc= 3.4573931692 fps D= .777174861861 ft Dc= .728077100849 ft 0= 8.7 cfs L= 40 ft n= .03 Tt= .211674425712 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 2 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 Va •i VI - rpt. I (- 1AtL DITCH CALCULATIONS S= .1049 ft/ft Sc= 1.40999498667E -2 ft /ft V= 8.78790164002 fps Vc= 4.22256254549 fps D= .587704473572 ft Dc= .980523129336 ft Q= 16.4 cfs L= 150 ft n= .03 Tt .284482018848 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL 8= 2 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 sµ 10 Vac-4-e! d iva. : _- I z (p4- LO DITCH CALCULATIONS I S= .0435 ft /ft Sc= 1.35663839107E -2 ft /ft. V= 6.10392928296 fps Vc= 4.06294391945 fps D= .630542267731 ft Dc= .856468487167 ft Q= 16.4 cfs L= 75 ft... n= .03 Tt= .204786120883 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 3 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 �a c er 1 �i 9TA EswzcrE' ' Iz(31�8Q Lo K= DITCH CALCULATIDNS S S= .0286 ft /ft Sc= 1.36094039632E -2 ft /ft V= 5.32122673952 fps Vc= 4.10892078808 fps D= .719651666808 ft Dc= .872088072844 ft 0= 17 cfs L= 35 ft n= .03 Tt= .10962384463 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 3 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 gµr7 l �laK.cY V/tgTs. &»*rArl i z( 31 (e¢ Lott DITCH CALCULATIONS +� S= .0153 ft /ft Sc= 1.36583126404E -2 ft /ft V= 4.31636845268 fps Vc= 4.16110463342 fps D= .866426520501 ft Dc= .889920452931 ft 0= 17.7 cfs L= 405 ft n= .03 Tt= 1.56381459878 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 3 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 • V M A—cm Vie; r.. eoccraa l2- ( WK. - DITCH CALCULATIONS S= .0126 f t/f t Sc= 1.38600194666E - 2 ft /ft V= 4.35178586825 fps Vc= 4.50935073801 fps D= 1.00810719023 ft Dc= .982131691734 ft Q= 24.2 cfs L= 205 ft n= .03 Tt= .785118287892 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 3.5 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 ') e'ra -,ems DITCH CALCULATIONS S= .0126 f t/f t Sc= 1.39977547309E -2 ft /ft V= 4.58349013503 fps Vc= 4.75215686929 fps D= 1.06703055429 ft - Dc= 1.0387401644 ft Q= 30 cfs L= 287 ft n= .03 Tt= 1.04360066072 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL 8= 4 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 1 201(s ec LAD(t DITCH CALCULATIONS "4" S= .0085 ft /ft Sc= 1.39808232972E - 2 ft /ft V= 4.02892047766 fps Vc= 4.82096775476 fps D= 1.21847831427 ft Dc= 1.06817559111 ft Q= 31.6 cfs L= 177 ft n= .03 Tt= .73220606273 min 1 TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL 8= 4 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 5i-+rr `t Ito E , lms 1-2,-(31 104- Lo« DITCH CALCULATIONS 5 S= .0098 ft/ft Sc= .013809905556 ft /ft V= 3.82316295418 fps Vc= 4.32269121919 fps D= 1.03273253885 ft -Dc= .945840104028 ft Q= 20 cfs L= 256 ft n= .03 - Tt= 1.11600439683 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 3 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 5i-+ -r ( OLLI et ` • By Date RYDER CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. Subject /oo7 Job No. Sheet of DRAd \(\r I 119 VLLE VBTA ETAJE5 rr / in lr� p p ylA5 VS � C. LESLIE D. KILLINSSWORTH, P.E. WEST 4111 JANICE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99208 PHONE: (509) 325 -2190 V AL_L.e( VI fl Er" . LULeatcl Drz Cst 1-pr-et VA. . t.- '-t V 17% Es c' O o Tv rb 4 ca +.c.E I - o Tc N M 00 ear2,•Tel-• f W.1 Ll-c-y o S, ef Fb2T1oN oG T. Z4 N. Z.44E.,v%hn L KAA 2BL.E LoaN.'-t SA,x� M 4a .E Spoor L.oP . StbKas STbKPr Los " Loa-Nis * Svoea CoNto x �1 N44-2.ctese SL.-r L_oAW. o om - klum F`ra. OF L.ory= - 1 Z. o Lair S t ZEs 2.71ocx, SF Tazrzrst , eXt^}t gS rr Qb is FUG A^iS A)...0 ev1 Da-== (r tT' •.J 7 \4E - - W F-ow Go Lo S SCCnot_+ 4 fl4•is DefQ-c'Mc*ct 2.4. b r'— , S T-. 41 15 5.3 1 l (- i 3 to l o N.. c) s%re_ -T 14 t .--•y CDCFI D (24 lS Go Vera i_.cn St- a. ( 4 , 4, ot- e.c PPrzo)Ct tinartzyl Bco AcY?et )kic`wr c...,c TNC' . 1 ;;'t-t4 a. ti---set-1c • 'Mc E i-rr RS 3(a .5( Co v t.0 t'1) -a l,uat...- (Zocinco Gtzpsse' j cS --o Tt M 1=3 EYZ . (Lc so( 71 -4.t m-C ct -e-ss C3 . T H rte' 1 S f.o ras oz EXC tvt S�� �S E - re - oS lo� o�L VA \•4 s?A EST s 1 ki LA-4 a z l-t C3 en . 4, I sea ST7a C 1.4 A i__,r Sv r- (-« -4 t ... Th-C - tL(2,& RvI..oF= At-2c R vc Loa—L.._ ac F I .et 1 n41 r-i tl+( s P2cj � AC A Lc, (-I. roi-4-OLJL? 1C,ts M (3, a l u t , Tl T i--r f- a l.) ca.s -CL 54+.5 I SVMM.AP.r21Zo SoB 54.5/1„, 442EA Ac¢ES- St_oFt % 4 E.av l- 11/44(g i-L La rk SDI L_ come- RCN J A zz 73 9S to o cass C 3 13 . 1 10,7 �' a 149' a so / 1350. 3 s G 135. U. taw - °e," 1350 S F302_ D 31 ,E ✓ _91 :'6 � 250 ' 2150 ,/ S r ; 9 ✓ 6G E a' Z ✓ 1344, 0- , 15.0 % ✓ floe- S Cis ✓ C Tt•+i.. Ki5Ti 2 RoL .W cr)-it A Paoac, 7 UPO►J T R -S5 , U 5■ f✓ TZP - n-4 Drla 2 uwr. i-ri..0 EXPCL v 7 JC ( 1..a 6- roy( -.c '2vn.-oF 1 — oefaob.e.) G A Co --e. • 1 i -.0.G l' ' --'Ted ^ k•---t/..Joe 4.- a -t.-rs i coke f M41 ReenhA 091 Oht - Ft s Ca. L.-Cu L.- Cotisc� 1 TO Oeie i-e N 1 ,-) Gv,pet! s w i A - 7 DevCLcGMecr UL1 M4T ._ EVat_t.4s.TS m.c 2os oF 4. r-cra Tnitiq;r--- 5 hs1 oc 4 a=am. te F3 .. eQ∎AGC..[UEThofl 5(.0..1/4, U,€5 T >E {c Ru,,.OFC.9 A Ci-+QrCS Ftx2_ Sit)2Mwa MC , C . %i Lk( M Pub 051 ras® I. t. - F P. C9 nc4-'s .\ /41" Y .ce k - E : ©2eS Al-4-E-1' frA57 Esags Qtx err' — 9e, 1 - AS • a) st-tS1-4a=, C3-f Th ScR7te-A 4C. Co,/ t-err r-e2a-e'S circt cat A QAL-CLA-es:n cs1,,S 1C ah.sto • C>C R rs • KILL' wesu.or2 cE (9E)-3 F M-1-C et.-:11(2e: • cana Cavc Nuk.A1:34: o axitrik.e. = 204 GiC=1 O ( 7 DEvt L4 o I-"Ser iSCatawS 7:0 A 2C.4--1 PrZerr".-tr 45 313 • ?coos udiCia,5 0 19a ekc, zth G35 (=co. • 10c, Welat-it CA--1 ( cc ' Gt 0 co t Li 1•s4 4 - re pt./ +-oork.4 ; • LA. ).-e A Cram ab '70 feCtLi ( 3 2 004a - c?..eSIDeb.rn:54-.. • 8z_ J 5146 rep,aos one sz., • ore— L-04-ac, 59it 100 Var_Ler Y s-m sr 3 u Ia z )-, ter. 41 1503 Pf>sr � P o cxr - n .. = RCQ Gco Lk) c n-+ 71-4i DeftapMe r'r USC % 4, RO--) Przocx or RESIO�- -rip._ Z.O 1S 70 10 STr2crs of cwz y 0 e S 9e 490 O Io, 630 GGm SZE° Temp- = 1 3 lc- U/EIGHTt - Z= C -J = G� = Coe.Zo a 05 68 WITH 0 c..�TT MP'ng IC) 1 'eLcPl. -% -T \- ar-o0S Ac( s % A 20.1 Przeoucr 12 i0, Z - ' t e 70 S4c,o i(T4C T S IN /ant 1 i3 l0 98 goo Dom. - Sam 1.5 l Z- Coc . - 74Z T:: 13 00 . 1l Z3Z �o E- r VitaES- o X timi r.�G = 2cN GCo \V t-+ Tµ 15 Dave_cr e LA 1.o 05c % Rc, J Pa .cT Rest ` a.° I S - IU [o50 sn2 5 4 C,ra. o •Co 5 95 490 Oc way lo_q • 90 c. cc. SZeo To?A• --> 13 .5 l00 $E.tGH?t -p 0-1 = 0 W 17?+ U L-r' M,d-'T'E Dt vel- GrMair. LaNO USE yo a Rai Pac RasIce -na,_ .: t i ea. 74 5740 • �-,-s Wl cam` t S l I x.0,8 ©Pat..) Scac.c ( p ' 1 :Co Co * Z. ToTS... • • (3,5 t oo. � I LC,S 27)-/ G8w '7 280 I co 4, (9s¢ (cc? a G5.Zo u5E GS 1) D o sxte-sn = CDC° o Ti- us Dsvat-or t1/4.4.--c- 05C RE-51 Da.-1-4-,- Srpeers ca./ arzes Oot-m-?3Pacr 4,coes o/o. A z's s 1 , as SO (9 co lo-rxec-t 3 I c- 00 \Xisl 0 = Gn° too Cat co u 5C CS o \9 11 L..71 tvtaPS tie -Mt tel--ceL4ar L-thr-o ()sc Acpes 2 6•SI Der-Tlf=1/24--- ST132CZTS 4 3 ' S' 4S 4,5 3 I 'co Ar, 192)5 WEIQ-Yre= 0,1 = z vit_LE I cc) Pecoucr- Sat 6,16 0 to A ZcaLi eaoct.ci- - I 9 -- 0 szr:) [1 9e, o 4 GC7 9Z-1- I 00 C -tw V l elrA• LY •cij o EX%�3f I 1-)a 2c+-1 Goo o WIr4 m+ is Davec tr�r� �a osC . Ac.taess go A Reo�r fZasl a 0, 3 7o x-1 S re�� rs w/ CLar• O •Co l Q 9 g 9$' O cSvac S,g- 87 Gca 5742_ To G'2_ t� WAG 1 / 4 ---N-1 G Z - G9.3Z vsc 69 v W TH U L MA1E DE.v0.,00Me.1r L NO USE (S,C(1fS ?o 4 2c4 1 Plecot.,GT x - 5r1 rs w( C4:e-ii!S 0.71. G,z ter 41, 196 - p _[ 0. X 76 l s8 (oz8 8 Gfo sa8 l c� 't2.Z� u73 D Exlsnr.6 7 4 le U L71kl,6,'C Anna' l31S( t -.) Acacs Coweras DEVaLP DE.vaciR S-4 FE A - z_ - a. GC., G 7.2- - 1, 3 a 13 6 � s 7-z_. 1 0,7 C 13,5 Gc:, GS 73 li,S O • 3I, co Cpc. C - 7 3 li,c E• 6:z. Gcc log - 73 (34 Sum 1 21-1 RCKI's Rata Eet.GH 500510 /Cols(nor.0 to Lrt ire _ 2.0 1933 PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) ******m*************m*m*************************************** PROJEC7TVALLEY-VISTA-ESTATES ---- ------ --- DRAINAGE BASIN: A RAINFALL EVENT 10 YEARS - COMDT|IONS: - BEFORE �DEVE�O�MENT----------' �- ---- -- -�--- -------- ---- -- DRAINAGE AREA 22 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 66 - -- � 5[3]PE ^ HYDRALULIC LENGTH 1300 FEET PRECIPITATION 2 INCHES RESULTING **************************m***********m********************m** PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) ************************************************************** PROJECT,VAttE ESTATES DRAINAGE BASIN: A RAINFALL EVENT 10 YEARS - CONDI71{NS1 - THIS - 1 ]EVELOFMENT DRAINAGE AREA 22 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 67 DPE ----' - ----- ------ '7"� 1 HYDRALULIC LENGTH 1300 FEET PRECIPITATION 2 INCHES RESULTING 3:759 ********i*********$******************************************* PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) * PROJECT:VALLEY VISTA ESTATES DRAINAGE BASIN: A R0IMFALCEVENT 10 CONDJTIONS VLTIMATE DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA 22 ACRES - RUNOFF - CURVE NUMBER ----- - ----- 72 SLOPE 7.3 % HYDRALULIC LENGTH 1300 FEET -PRECIPITATI 2--INCHES RESULTING RUNOFF= 6,814 CFS ************************************************************** • ____ ______ _ • PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) ************************************************************** PRpJECTiYAL[EY VISTA ESTATES DRAINAGE BASIN: 8 RAINFALL EVENT 10 YEARS CONDITIONS: DRAINAGE AREA 13 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 66 -S[OPE--------����������������� ��� ---�- 10.7' HYDRALULIC LENGTH 1350 FEET PREC IPITATION 2 INCHES -REGUL:TING-RUNOFF=- - �� **************m*********************************************** • PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) ************************************************************** ' PROJECTFVALLEY ESTATES--- ' - ----- - - - DRAINAGE BASIN: B RAINFALL EVENT 10 YEARS 'CONDITIONS: DRAINAGE AREA 13 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 68 - SLOPE -- -- ------10�7 HYDRALULIC LENGTH 1350 FEET PRECIPITATION 2 INCHES RESU[71NG ' 2.848 - '----'� - *******************m***************************************** PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) *****************************M****************************** PROJECT: DRAINAGE BASIN: 8 RAINFALL EVENT 10 YEARS DRAINAGE AREA 13 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 72 SLOFE --------------- HYDRALULIC LENGTH - ' 1350 FEET PRECIPITATION -- ------- 2 INCHES RESULTING-RUNOFF=" -- -- -- ************$************************************************* 1 0 - - --'' ^ -� • PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) i(***********************4*************************** PROJECT:VALLFY VISTA ESTATES DRAINAGE BASIN: C RAINFALL EVENT 10 YEARS 20NDITIONS: BEPORE DEVELOPMENT --- 5 ACRES DRAINAGE AREA � 13.5 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER- 66 �- - Si�OPE 41.8-74 HYDRALULIC LENGTH 1350 FEET PRECIPITATION 2 INCHES � RE LTING 2;357 CFS ` ************************************************************** PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) ******************************m*********************** PROJECT:-VALLEY-VISTA-ESTATES--• --- - ----- - '---- DRAINAGE BASIN: C RAINFALL EVENT 10 YEARS CONDlTIONS; THIS DRAINAGE AREA - --�� 13 5 ACRES ' " RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 68 SLOPE --- -'-- �---'-' ' ^ HYDRALULIC LENGTH 1350 FEET [RECIP�TPRECIPITATION 2 INCHES RESULTING 3^'062 ************************************************************** 11 PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) ****************************.********************************** - PROJECT: - VALLEY - VISTA - ESTATES DRAINAGE BASIN: C RAINFALL EVENT 10 YEARS - CONDITIONSCULTDlATE - DEVELOPMENT -------- 5 ACRES DRAINAGE AREA 13.5 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 73 SLOPE -- -- --------- -------------- - '--- Il�8--��'--- -- HYDRALULIC LENGTH 1350 FEET PRECIPITATION 2 INCHES � '-- *****m9*4******$*****m***************************************t - FEAK FLOWS *******************************************w*********$i******* PROJECT:VALLEY VISTA ESTATES DRAINAGE BASIN: D ' RAINFALL EVENT 10 YEARS CONDITIONS: BEFORE DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA ' 31.6 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE HUMBER 66 SLOPE 11.6 % HYDRALULIC-LENGTH- - 2150 FEET PRECIPITATION 2 INCHES RESULTING RUNOFF= 4.368 CFS 4(*fl***44*********************A******************************3 12 — PEAK - RUNOFF'FLnWS ' � - (TR-'55)-- ' ********************* PROJECT:VALLEY VISTA ESTATES DRAINAGE D -------------------''----- -- -------- - RAINFALL EVENT 10 YEARS CONDITIONS: THIS DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE ----31..6r-ACRE5 -- RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER --- 68 SLOPE 11.6 % HYDRALULIC LENGTH-- -- --' ----- - 2l50 - 'FEET PRECIPITATION 2 INCHES RESULTING RUNOFF= 5.714 CFS *****MME********M**********************11****************-- --- -- - ---- PEAK (TR-55) ************************************************************** PROJECT:VALLEY VISTA ESTATES DRAINHGE BASIN: D RAINFALL EVENT 10 YEARS CONDITIONS: ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT DR;�INAGE - ARE;� ---- ' ----- ' ------------------------ �� ----- �l��� -- ACRE5 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 73 SLOPE 11.6 % HYDRA[OLIC-LENGTH-- -----------�--'----------�715C—FEET' -- PRECIPITATION- - 2 INCHES RESULTING RUNOFF= 10.246 CFS *4(n4***1*********M*44(*******1************t*I(*********T**¢**4- _ _ _ _ • - PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) ***************«********************************************** F`ROJFCT`: VISTA' ESTATES DRAINAGE BASIN: E RAINFALL EVENT 10 YEARS CONDITIONS: BEFORE DEVELOPMENT - 2 ACRES DRAINAGE AREA 6.2 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 66 % SLOPE - 13.6 HYDRALULIC LENGTH 1100 FEET PRECIPITATION 2 INCHES RESULTING-RUNOFF=— 1fl95-CFS' - **************m****m************************** PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) • *********************�********************** �PROJECT:VAL[EY DRAINAGE BASIN: E RAINFALL EVENT 10 YEARS - COND7T - IONS: - ULTIMATE - DEVELOPMENT n ACRES DRAINAGE AREA 6.2 _ 7� RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER - SLOPE _-�-----��-� - �� --13-;-6 �6 %-' --- HYDRALULIC LENGTH 1100 FEET 2 INCHES PRECIPITATION _ __ CESULT�[NG ����8�4 CFS- --- --��-' **m*********************************************** 55) PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS � (TR-55) **************m**************************m*** PROJECT:VALLEY -- --------�--- --- - ---- DRAINAGE BASIN: E RAINFALL EVENT 10 YEARS �CONDI7IONSr-fH][S-DFVELOPMENT '------- -------- DRAINApE AREA 6.2 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 69 'StOFE HYDRALULIC LENGTH � � 1100 FEET PRECIPITATION 2 INCHES -RESULT-ING-RUNOFF- 1"816 CFS *********m*********$*******$************* • 13 _ PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR -55) *********:******. W. W.***************:*.*:***** * * * * * *:* *:: * * * * * * * *:4 *: *: * **:4: FROJECT:VALLEY VISTA ESTATES - -" DRAINAGE BASIN: A RAINFALL EVENT 50 YEARS CONDITIONS: BEFORE DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA - - - - - - -- 22. ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER - 66 SLOPE - - - -- -- 7.3 HYDRALULIC LENGTH 1300 FEET PRECIPITATION 2.4 INCHES - RESULTING -- 6 :152 ******************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR -55) ******************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** PROJECT: VALLEY - "VISTA" ESTATES DRAINAGE BASIN: A RAINFALL EVENT 50 YEARS CONDITIONS: THIS - DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER - SLUPE HYDRAULIC LENGTH PRECIPITATION "RESULTING ******************* 6:846 CFS 22 ACRES 67 /. 1300 FEET 2.4 INCHES PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR -55) ******************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** - PROJECT: - VALLEV - VISTA ESTATES DRAINAGE BASIN: A RAINFALL EVENT 50 YEARS CONDITIONS: ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA 22 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 72 SLOPE 7° G _ HYDRALULIC LENGTH 1300 FEET PRECIPITATION - 2.4 INCHES - RESULTING"RUNOFF 1"lTT33' CFS" ******************************* 4 * ** * * *4 ** * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * 14 PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) **m********************4******************* ROJECT:VAL[EY-VIGTA'ESTATES----�� - '------ RAINAGE BASIN: B RAINFALL EVENT 50 YEARS ONDITIONS BEFOREDEYELOFMENT- - ' -- --------- 13 ACRES RAINAGE AREA UNOFF CURVE NUMBER 66 10.7 % |YDRALULIC LENGTH 1350 FEET ----- 2 4 INCHES RECIPITATION � . _ `E5U[TING 4v:103 CFS ***************************************** PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) K************************************** "ROJECTTVA[[EY-TVISTA-ESTATES--- - - -- DRAINAGE BASIN: B RAINFALL EVENT 50 YEARS 30MDITION5CTHIS DRAINAGE AREA 13 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 68 --_--_ 10.7 � 3�]PE� HYDRALULIC LENGTH 1350 FEET 2.4 INCHES �^� �n�n�^ PRECIPITATION rxc�.�r�.".^" ' _ RESULTING-RUNOFF=---- 51o55�CFG ************************************************************** PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) **************m*.**m********************* FROJECTnVACLEY VISTA DRAINAGE BASIN: 8 RAINFALL EVENTh 50 YEARS ' - CONDITIONS: ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA 13 ACRES - RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER � - 72 � - - - '10�7 - �---- -SLOPE 1350 FEET HYDRALULIC LENGTH � ^ INCHES 2.4 �n^..�� PRECIPITATION '",-,,,',/r-o,/mnc���� «��u�/�no nu'`=''� ************************� ********************************t �*� �*� w 1 5 PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) ***********************************m************************** PROJECT:\/ALLEY EGTATFS - --------- ' - ' ' DRAINAGE BASIN: C RAINFALL EVENT 50 YEARS CONDITIONS: BEFORE DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA 13.5 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER-------- - 66 11.8 -% ' HYDRALULIC LENGTH 1350 FEET PRECIPITATION 2.4 INCHES ****$********************************************************* PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) ************************************************************** PRDJECT:VALLEY - - -- DRAINAGE BASIN: C RAINFALL EVENT 50 YEARS CONDITIONS:-THIS-DEVELOPMENT - - - DRAINAGE AREA 13.5 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER - 68 'SLOPE 11.8 HYDRALULIC LENGTH 1350 FEET PRECIPITATION 2.4 INCHES - RESULTING - RUNOFF= ��.436-CFS-- ---- - - -- ************************************************************** 16 '- PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR-55) *******************m****************************************** - PROJECT: - VALLEY - VISTA - ESTATES DRAINAGE BASIN: C RAINFALL EVENT 50 YEARS - CDNDITION5r - ULTIMATE - DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA 13.5 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 73 - SLOPE 11.8 A HYDRALULIC LENGTH 1350 FEET PRECIPITATION 2.4 INCHES RESU[T3Np -8:686-CFS ---------------- - **************4(*** ****m**********$**************************E -------' ---- --' - (TR -55) PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS *.****:*:*:M****:* *: *: * * *: ** * * *: * * * * * * **4: *: * * * ** * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * *: ** ROJECT:VALLEY ESTATES - -" RAINAGE BASIN: D RAINFALL EVENT 50 YEARS : ONDITIONS:" BEFORE DEVELOPMENT" DRAINAGE AREA :UNOFF CURVE NUMBER ;COPE IYDRALULIC LENGTH- - -- - -- 2150 FEET RECIPITATION 2.4 INCHES ?ESULTING RUNOFF = - - 8: 179 - CFS - -- - 31.6 ACRES 66 11 - .6 PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (fR -55) k*.****************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 'ROJECT :VALLEY-- VISTA'ESTATES - DRAINAGE BASIN: D RAINFALL EVENT 50 YEARS 'ONDSTIONS: " "" - ._ DRAINAGE AREA 31.6 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 68 SCOPE .11.6 /. HYDRALULIC LENGTH 2150 FEET PRECIPITATION 2.4 INCHES . RESULTING - RUNOFF = --- -10- " ******************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** PEAK. RUNOFF FLOWS (TR -55) F'ROJECTE7ALLEY VISTA - - ESTATES DRAINAGE BASIN: D RAINFALL EVENT 50 YEARS CONDITIONS: - ULTIMATE - DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER - SLOPE - -- HYDRALULIC LENGTH PRECIPITATION RESULTING - RUNOFF= - 16.454 -CFS **'*****************************:* * * * * * * * *: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * ** 31.6 ACRES 73 11.6 /. 2150 FEET 2.4 INCHES 17 -- ' - PEAK - RDNOFF F[OWS ************************************************************** PRPJECT:VAiLEY VISTA ESTATES DRAINAGE-BASIN: E ' --- - -'' - RAINFALL EVENT 50 YEARS CONDITIONS: BEFORE DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA - RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER SLOPE - HYDRALULIClENPTH --- PRECIPITATION RESULTING RUNOFF= 2.332 CFS ******M*(*i(* 6.2 ACRES --- 66 --- 13.6 % 1100 FEET 2.4 INCHES PEAK RUNOFF-FLOWS. - '---- ---'--- -(TR-L55) --- **********************************m*************************** PROJECT:VALLEY VISTA ESTATES RAINFALL EVENT 50 YEARS CONDITIONS: THIS DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE ----- -' -- - -- - 6.2 ACRES -' RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 69 SLOPE - 13.6 % HYDRA[U[IC - [ENGTH --------------- z --------------- r -- - 110(/ -- FEET 4 INCHES PRECIPITATION - '- 2.4 RESULTING RUNOFF= 3.199 CFS * * * * * **444 )*4 Trnf******4***f**** 18 . _ PEAK RUNOFF (TR-55) ������ ************************m************************************* PROJECT:VALLEY VISTA ESTATES DRPJNAGE E RAINFALL EVENT 50 YEARS CONDITIONS: ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT 2 ACRES DRAINAGE AREA 6.2 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 73 SLOPE 1:.6 % RYDRALOLIC LENGTH 1100 FEET PRECIPITATION 2.4 INCHES RESULTING RUNOFF= 4.519 CFS T*-*i4*4-44-ff*-****** -- �-- ------ SUMMARY OF RUNOFF AND LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT TEN YEAR FREQUENCY RAINFALL BASIN EXIST. THIS ULIT- NET NET DEV. MATE ULTIMAT ------ 3.285 3,759 6.814 .474 3.529 B 2.191 2.848 4.528 .657 2.337 C 2.357 3.062 ' 5.409 3.052 D 4.368 5.714 10.246 1.346 5.878 E 1.245 1.816 2.814 .571 1.569 13.446 17.199 29.811 3.753 16^765 FIFTY YEAR FREQUENCY RAINFALL BASIN EXIST. ' THIS ULIT- NET . NET DEV. MATE THIS ULTIMAT H 6.152 6"846 11.133 .694 4.981 8 4.103 5.055 7.397 .952 3.294 C 4.414 5.436 8.686 1.022 4.272 D 8.179 10.142 16.454 1.963 8.275 _ E 2.332 3.149 4.519 ' ^817 2.187 25"18 30.628 48.189 5.448 23.009 CS peve- opt.i. • 3.581 cFS Fte w 4 ,-o r Z '1 ,C V L n M fs O€ I€L ° Ms -- r' 15 ,113 c t, -(' — svt t TPA 5 t7e.ve rr 49- sc�rzao� -.�, 1 L aL .cam L t ' _ -ts Kii=o4 f 6 Dec( Uset,-g ITT as xcat -- r/ S. i- rAF31 -5 E xccoj - Cam_ Severe?t -- S I _rte., SG r-� Fi G 1 -317 . . LT I.S l 'F>r'lo A •IaCst rte ;. VAti� i / c K , w ti!.3su.o2T1 -a pr' 41Set DATE = 03/27/84 DESCRIPTION = VALLEY VISTA ESTATES SUBAREA 1 = 87 ACRES SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9 TOTAL AREA = ^87 ACRES COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = ,9 OVERLAND FLOW VALUES Ct = .15 L = 0 N = .016 S = .06 CHANNEL FLOW VALUES • L = 1062 Z1 = .172 Z2 = 36 N = .016 B = 0 S = .0659 TD = .17 COMPUTED VALUES DUR = 5.00 I10 = 3.07 010 = 2"41 QA = 2.37 RATIONAL FORMULA HYDROLOGY DESIGNER = G. NELSON BASIN 000 TO 1062 DATE = 03/27/84 DESCRIPTION = VALLEY VISTA ESTATES SUBAREA 1.= "2 ACRES TOTAL AREA = .2 ACRES OVERLAND FLOW VALUES Ct = .15 L = 0 N = .1 S = .01 � CHANNEL FLOW VALUES L = 220 Z1 = .172 • Z2 = 36 N = .016 B = 0 S = .0136 TD = .13 COMPUTED VALUES OUR = 5.00 I10 = 3.07 Q10 = .55 QA = .53 / ' RATIONAL FORMULA HYDROLOGY DESIGNFR G. NELSON BASIN 1545 TO 1765 SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9 COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9 DATE = 03/27/84 DESCRIPTION = VALLEY VISTA ESTATES SUBAREA 1 = .39 ACRES SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9 TOTAL AREA= .39 ACRES COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9 OVERLAND FLOW VALUES Ct = .15 L = 0 N = .4 S = .01 CHANNEL FLOW VALUES L = 425 Z1 = .172 Z2 = 40 N = .016 = 0 S = .0132 TD = .16 COMPUTED VALUES DUR = 5.00 I10 = 3.07 010 = 1.08 QA = 1.00 RATIONAL FORMULA HYDROLOGY DESIGNER = G. NELSON BASIN 1120 TO 1545 DATE = 03/27/84 DESCRIPTION = VALLEY VISTA ESTATES SUBAREA 1 = ^5 ACRES SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9 TOTAL AREA = .5 ACRES COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9 OVERLAND FLOW VALUES Ct = ^15 L. = 0 N = .4 S = .01 CHANNEL FLOW VALUES L = 548 Z1 = .172 Z2 = 40 N = .016 B = 0 S = .0172 TD = .17 COMPUTED VALUES DUR = 5.00 110 = 3.07 810 = 1.38 QA = • 1.35 RATIONAL FORMULA HYDROLOGY DESIGNER = G. NELSON BASIN 1120 TO 572 DATE -= 03/27/84 DESCRIPTION = VALLEY VISTA ESTATES SUBAREA 1 = .16 J ACRES SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = "9 TOTAL AREA = .16 ACRES COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9 OVERLAND FLOW VALUES Ct = .15 L = 0 N = .4 S = .01 CHANNEL FLOW VALUES L = 177 71 = .172 Z2 = 40 N = .016 B = 0 S = .0113 TD = .12 COMPUTED VALUES DUR = 5.00 110 = 3.07 010 = .44 QA = .43 RATIONAL FORMULA HYDROLOGY DESIGNER = G. NELSON BASIN 395 TO 572 DATE = 03/27/84 Ct = .15 L = 0 Nr = .4 S = .01 CHANNEL FLOW VALUES L = 403 Z1 = .172 Z2 = 40 N = .016 P = 0 S = .0199 TD = .15 COMPUTED VALUES DUR = 5.00 I10 = 3.07 010 `- 1.02 . QA = 1.04 RATIONAL FORMULA HYDROLOGY DESIGNER = G. NELSON BASIN 8 TO 572 DESCRIPTION = VALLEY VISTA ESTATES SUBAREA 1 = .37 ACRES SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9 TOTAL AREA = .37 ACRES COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9 OVERLAND FLOW VALUES STATION OF GRATE= 0 CONTINUOUS GRADE STANDARD GRATE STATION OF GRATE= 1551 CONTINUOUS GRA STANDARD GRATE STATION OF GRATE= 1120 CONTINUOUS GRADE STANDARD GRATE DRAINAGE GRATE DESIGN DATE= 03/30/84 DESIGNER= G. NELSON DESCRIPTION= PONDEROSA DRIVE 0-390 0= .5 DRAINAGE GRATE DESIGN STATION OF GRATE= Q= .92 N= ,016 S= "032 SUMP GUTTER tOW = 1.86 CFS CO. ,TANDARD GRATE GRATE CA = 7"22 CFS INDETERMI •'TE FLOW PROJECT- VALLEY VIPl N= .016 S- .005 XS= .025 GUTTER FLOW = .50 CFS O INTERCEPTED = .40 CFS O BYPASS = .10 CFS DATE= 03/3()/84 DESIGNER- G. NELSON F ECT= VALLEY VISl DESCRIPTION= GUTHR -POND" TO SUMP 0= 2.67 N= .016 S=. .0083 XS= .025 GUTTER FL = 2.67 CFS O INTER ``TED = 1.23 CFS O BYP 'S = 1.44 CFS N= .016 S= .008 XS= .025 GUTTER FLOW = 1.94 CFS O INTERCEPTED = 1"00 CFS O BYPASS = .94 CFS DRAINAGE GRATE DESIGN DATE= 03/30/84 DESIGNER= G. NELSON DESCRIPTION= PONDEROSA DR. RIGHT SIDE STATION OF GRATE= 1551 CONTINUOUS GRADE STANDARD GRATE STATION OF GRATE= 1120 CONTINUOUS GRADE STANDARD GRATE 0= .28 N= .016 S= .0083 XS= .025 GUTTER FLOW = .28 CFS O INTERCEPTED = .25 CFS • 0 BYPASS = .07 CFS 0= "5 N= .016 S= .008 GUTTER FLOW = ^53 CFS O INTERCEPTED = .40 CFS O BYPASS = .13 CFS PROJECT= VALLEY VIS XS .025 STATION OF GRATE= 572 0= ^92 N= .016 S= .032 XS= .025 SUMP GUTTER FLOW = 1.05 CFS CO" STANDARD GRATE GRATE CAPACITY = 7.22 CFS INDETERMINATE FLOW STATION OF GRATE= 1120 , CONTINUOUS GRADE STANDARD GRATE DRAINAGE GRATE DESIGN DATE= 03/30/84 DESIGNER= G. NELSON DESCRIPTION= PONDEROSA-LEFT SIDE STATION OF GRATE= 1551 0= 2"67 N= .016 . 9= .0083 XS= .025 CONTINUOUS GRADE GUTTER FLOW = 2.67 CFS STANDARD GRATE. 0 INTERCEPTED = 1.23 CFS 0 BYPASS = 1.44 CFS Q= . PROJECT= VALLEY VIS' N= ,016 S= .008 XS= ^025 GUTTER FLOW = 1.94 CFS Q INTERCEPTED = 1.00 CFS Q BYPASS = ^94 CFS STATION OF GRATE= 572 0= .92 N= .016 S= "032 XS= .025 SUMP GUTTER FLOW = 1.86 CFS CO. STANDARD GRATE GRATE CAPACITY = 7.22 CFS INDETERMINATE FLOW t Q • STREET CROSS ' SLOPE FT /FT MANNINGS "N" STREET GRADE CONTINUOUS GRADE OR SUMP (C /S) STA COUNTY STANDARD GRATE (Y /N) 1 5 , 096 . 0/ G 2 3 4 ' 5 6 7 , 8 9 '10 NON STD GRATE AREA // ' WIDTH LENGTH BAR DEPTH DATE 3 — — ect NAME CT, J \(ckSc7V1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION P,ar // OF AREAS VAL Fu /;K 5 ±; "GRATE PROGRAM" INPUT FORM DRAINAGE GRATE DESIGN Co. Std. Grate P (3 sides) = 1.7 + 1.5 + 1.7 A = 1.45 Sq. Ft. 0 3 9/n SUMP AREA // PERIMETER AREA AVAIL- ABLE HEAD 4.9' Std. Curb H.W. = . 67' 1 Q STREET CROSS SLOPE ^' FT /FT MANNINGS "N" STREET GRADE CONTINUOUS GRADE OR SUMP (C /S) STA COUNTY STANDARD GRATE (Y /N) . 1 +-'2B io2-5 ,d16 oos3 2. 'C , ood 3 •71 t/ 4 4 4 5 6 7' . 8 9 `10 DATE .1/ OF AREAS 3A0/L7 Mr NAME PROJECT VA j Y [X'< 7 . et DESCRIPTION P07,/ /� CVO, 50� / )/'[ J c 3 "GRATE PROGRAM" INPUT FORM • DRAINAGE GRATE DESIGN t ± .Si plc NON STD GRATE AREA # WIDTH LENGTH BAR DEPTH Co. Std. Grate P (3 sides) = 1.7 + 1.5 + 1.7 = 4.9' A = 1.45 Sq. Ft. SUMP AREA 11 PERIMETER AREA AVAIL- ABLE HEAD Std. Curb H.W. = .67' DITCH CALCULATIONS S= 2.26666666667E -2 ft /ft Sc= 1.78214297326E -2 ft /ft V= 4.32271267002 fps Vc= 4.00236473018 fps D= .60882891092 ft Dc= .646130444788 ft 0= 11.1 cfs L= 300 ft n= .03 Tt= 1.15668108933 mi n TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 3 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 DITCH CALCULATIONS S= "19.)0_`„,000°00 ft/ft Sc= 1^78214297326E-2 ft/ft V= 9.07331035272 fps Vc= 4.00236473018 fps D= .333597773892 ft Dc= .646130444788 ft Q= 11.1 cfs L= 15 ft n= .03 . Tt= 2.75533394408E-2 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 3 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 DITCH CALCULATIONS S= .08 ft/ft Sc= 2°68027241263E-2 ft/ft V= 3.01352536955 fps Vc= 2.11050997452 fps. D= .131391288403 ft Dc= "175387802484 ft Q= .5 cfs L= 5 ft n= ^03 Tt= 2"76531049565E-2 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 1 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 DITCH CALCULATIONS S= .0985 ft /ft Sc= 1.88049448333E -2 ft /ft V= 7.1596064789S fps Vc= 3.89215068521 fps D= .511109834223 ft Dc= .756544202576 ft 0= 7.4 cfs L= 200 ft n= .03 Tt= .465574936712 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL 8= 1 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 DITCH CALCULATIONS S= .062 ft /ft Sc= 1.87102042294E -2 ft /ft V= 5.79605709164 fps Vc= 3.77095680706 fps D= .442531167937 ft Dc= .609587013866 ft 0= 7.4 cfs L= 40 ft n= .03 Tt= .115020721178 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 2 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 DITCH CALCULATIONS S= "10303030303 ft/ft Sc= 1"83013343759E-2 ft/ft V= 7.27154918177 fps Vc= 3.91302021675 fps D= .420989633207 ft Dc= .666907569232 ft Q= 8.7 cfs L= 330 ft n= .03 Tt= .756372522898 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 2 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 D dac f DITCH CALCULATIONS S= .01 ft/ft Sc= 1~83013343759E-2 ft/ft V= 3"14949084862 fps Vc= 3.91302021675 fps D= .777174861861 ft Dc= .666907569232 ft Q= 8.7 cfs L= 40 ft n = .03 Tt= .211674425712 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 2 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 DITCH CALCULATIONS S= "10493.)3..30.:; ft/ft Sc= .016912837932 ft/ft V= 9"78890461438 fps Vc= 4"51428363362 fps D= "58765552358 ft Dc= °93751748977B ft 0= 16.4 cfs L= 150 ft n= .03 Tt= .28444955426 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 2 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 De 6666 17991 DITCH C* CULATIONS S= 4.34666 Sc= 1.6840 V= 6.1027833" 67 fps Vc= 4"390409 99 fps ;It. .6306734 Dc= .80891 B= 3 ft Lt S= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 E-2 4t/ft 1E-2 ft/ft ft ft Q= 16.4 fs " m c L= 75 f n= .03 Tt= , min TRAP,ZOIDALCHANNEL DITCH CALCULATIONS S= 2"85714285714E-2 ft/ft Sc= 1.67576221123E-2 ft/ft V= 5.31934909492 fps Vc= 4.42753684616 fps D= .719843484787 ft DC= .825532714449 ft Q= 17 cfs L= 35 ft n= ^03 Tt= .10966254 VO82 min TRAPEZOIDALCH0NNEL 8= 3 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 DITCH CALCULATIONS S= 1.53086419753E -2 ft /ft Sc= 1.66649421145E -2 ft /ft V= 4.31723025307 fps Vc= 4.46945827578 fps D= .866299913626 ft Dc= .844555029783 ft D= 17.7 cfs L= 405 ft n= .03 Tt= 1.56350243196 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 3 ft . Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 DITCH CALCULATIONS ' S= 1.25853658537E-2 ft/ft Sc= .015989108779 ft/ft V= 4.34971457632 fps Vc= 4"74629843464 fps D= 1.00845871249 ft Dc= .945708673736 ft 0= 24.2 cfs L= 205 ft n= .03 Tt= .785492152812 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL 8= 3.5 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 DITCH CALCULATIONS 8= 1.26132404181E-2 ft/ft Sc= 1.55466248317E-2 ft/ft V= 4"58518106024 fps Vc= 4.93354488926 fps D= 1"0667385988 ft Dc= 1.01007715244 ft Q= 30 Cfs L= 287 ft n = .03 :Ft= 1.04321580119 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 4 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 DITCH CALCULATIONS S= 8.47457627119E-3 ft/ft Sc= 1.54351589948E-2 ft/ft ' V= 4.02455518517 fps Vc= 4"9945870966 fps D= 1"21943679826 ft Dc= 1.04044717217 ft Q= 31.6 cfs L= 177 ft n = .03 Tt= .733000260717 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 4 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 DITCH CALCULATIONS S= .009765625 ft/ft Sc= 1^63883044079E-2 ft/ft V= 3"81843531826 fps Vc= 4.59785513875 fps D= 1.03364058725 ft Dc= .90451719721 ft 0= 20 cfs L= 256 ft n= .03 T+= 1°11738613098 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 3 ft Lt SS= 2 :1 Rt SS= 2 :1 21 15 12 A -1 B tC4E$EBEFORE CFS VS TIME A 10 11 1 l? 14 15 1G 18 TtlR IN Ni1NGc' D P D D G G G G G G G O < < < < < < < < RwC7m III III lit m mm ITT m mmm D BEFORE 7INE EN HOURS 5 4 i t 0 C BEFORE C: F • 11 1 is 14 15 1 1 _' TTNF IN Hfillb'=; TIME 20 2 1 4 - 10 t I GF YS , TIME 11 12 13 14 15 1E 1 TIME IN Nimes B BEFORE ' I - S.C. S. Tf H I DR_ b I s. C. s. Teb •NYcI . P CS FT S t.. Unt-1- A B ASI Al ( 50 Qso VO s. Qsa / dro 40 c9 A _6efoRe 6.1 i 1 t i 1 1 1 I i1i: 5 .21 9so 4.1 _ 2z950 .. .. A -.A .-er e B- B 11. ), 9: 1 1 Ie•7., 3.5 ...36 Iz So 9.y 3.0 38,Iso 136 �- AfICR. N .. b.5 2. 3.50 s. $ n c _t JORe_ ` L . L / 3. 13j 450 3.1 _ n4 C` Affer g. 7 6.1 24150 b.2. 2.S2-o0 . .0 : 13e,y'oRe 8.2._ G. 0 31 350 (7.3 3a. D - Acte,r 1 6.5 13.0 S6, Ise /4.6 • 58,890 _F - E27a 2. 3 i.Li 6 14 Ggse .E - A 'er 9.5 3 -0 11100 3.1 11,600 ,aRQDE. ¢e..-Page r 15.5 . 85 9O•0 _ . r) .1 90 000 AacnE.A{ter —, 3 151100 28: . :15 - 4, j 268 ( VA LLEY VISTA EST P E /1107 �I .17.c /te e sz si. tn._ 74' / G Zr ✓ )� I /vr A51- -.Q/J- '4''(/Y / /4 ✓.A ..4112.40 //y r, TAG L y e _ S 1 7 / -r•-err A,- Cr60 =/Zo f�'Cr.,fi c� ce e. s 4' s o / 24 ca �Ay G o/ - 3 G , /z Li� r dPr /4 y X ' ,4 7g0 T / -a- j % 7ef 47 .3 e3 �`/ye), fr n fli-v 4c2 i�i� -A /B - a ot. Irni y C. RECUVED . SPOKANE SE QUADRANGLE ,. , A la p c WASHINGTON-SPOKANE CO. r1,0 4. . 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) FEB 2 1. 1985 , ‘• SE/4 SPOKANE 15' QUADRANGLE . ,c ' E R COUnnagineering '79 2 830 000 FEET! • Opir.v.;•: 2 :. ;.' / 117°15 : .. _ C •<:;:?: , . . I . ... .i . 47°3730" . • . • •. - .1 . • • •• .. ... . . - I .. . a • ''. • ■ . • • •• .. .. _ - 0 \ T . JJ 3 3 ' - • • .-' ' -.- .- ; ' "-, - ..___. 74- _ ..-- ' 2 . 3 2 ;:,-. /.. -:-..;:.1 - s;%. .: --' 5774 • ; , [ . 1 " i' -.1.....1,: '';.•_ L _ e #.%C./t.... lentose"2 • , ,-: •: - 2 • :;:: I t',. .. . ....,,„ Chester:NK P • ,.... , • if' , • .-:... _ , , -.. - . , • •. . . . . 1 k • r -1 _.-. L : ..., , . Spi-ing r ... . . .. ▪ 1 .,.. , ,, , • .. • c*.- . \ . , • _ .1190 i ' . „. •'',--.) \., ( ,,___<„:,._- .- . , a . . . • . D " ' ' e s ' 1 .. . .• . • • ' I ; r I . r j 1 7'7 - . i , .`„ # if t '-‘?' - A,' •i 1 0 • I f ..fr:!, C < -- - _ ( --:: '..:. -•■•.-.. tz:: - : :----, `i- • . .• . I. 1 ▪ :'•„,1 ( C ., 1 • . 1 . °- . % (", • -* - ,,,..,/ ;. • ...;;;.,,-...„..------, i ,.......,___. , .. • .. I] ■1" , f cis • --• : (1 • _7 .• ZI , • jt 11. 11 r H • c, 7 „ •„.. „ • " ) : ; • , 2 r / ; -) L T-Ht . / 2,j • \/".. 5773 "71 i s ,.\ • , 1 \ ■ 52 72 240 000 FEET • • •: "70 35' fe a Beet' F-. 1/4._) crz M 6TCa Aire - � o .t\ ■s(c7 Qo6 51 —e 1 ' oo 9 => e P c -LCS F- 0?z7C(2_O'VO4S) DITCH CALCULATIONS S= .0082 ft /ft Sc= 1.43331106635E -2 ft /ft V= 4.78283740664 fps • Vc= 5.80107539274 fps D= 1.51612942017 ft Dc= 1.3007988 ft 0= 60 c f s L= 575 ft n= .03 Tt= 2.00349205945 min. TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 6 ft Lt SS= 1.5 :1 Rt SS= 1.5 :1 D2a\ L k t _ i' G Sw4al kat, Z i - -g , DITCH CALCULATION S= .0082 ft/ft Sc= 1.440 -2 ft /ft V= 4.92462597653 fps Vc= 6.05708015507 fps D= 1.81312849524 ft 'Dc= 1.56176938057 ft 0= 60 c f s L= 575 ft n= .03 Tt= 1.94600227083 min TR B= 4 f t TTatin LUW)11 -H Lt SS= 1.5 :1 Rt SS= 1.5 :1 \i/ .-c- 7 V ie-A (UN -Na 5 L A TL is iex n 1;.)a- 9rc c N i P( ∎.) ■.l• 4 Pe Lc. Cc:ow Rv f o = O = GO CAS tr 4 so ° JT'D2An c 3c. A. oa c --vs - ' CoN - rpr co 1 ti s T2.ct - 2o 6 5� or� c� o.00sz c -r(c.--r 4 - 'r vv . % w on-. 44-ro SI u s sc..--5:7 > e Atr I I H rLc#sc tze. V E c •. ( - A - › 7 izfi SrLn7. L-r .1is-drPs_ -rh o Pte•. t-i (-'JL gc , Ster, Li Mr \�, `: , - p ' .1 vom • s lO - NAL 04Cf 1,' L, kip itic , DATE = 02/14/85 TOTAL AREA BASIN INPUT DATA CALCULATED VALUES TABULAR HYDROGRAPH HYDROGRAPH DESIGN S.C.S. TR-55 METHOD DESIGNER= G. NELSON BASIN STREAM DESCRIPTION= VALLEY 'VISTA ESTATES PE 1407 SUBAREA 1 = 450 ACRES SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER = 66 450 ACRES COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER = 66.00 RAINFALL = 2 INCHES HYDRAULIC LENGTH = 7500 FEET WATERSHED SLOPE = 13 PERCENT TRAVEL TIME = 0 HOURS S = 5.15 0 = .15 INCHES LAG = .66 HOURS Tc = 1.09. HOURS VOLUME = 238,561.31 C.F. MAX RUNOFF =. 32.05 C.F.S. HOURS RUNOFF IN C.F.S. 10.0 0.00 11.0 1.32 11.5 2.47 11.70 4.54 11.80 6.53 11.90. 10.44 12.00 14.02 12.10 20.23 12.20 25.03 12.30 29.23 12.40 31.25 12.50 32.05 12.60 31.31 12.70 29.52 12.80 27.04 12:90 24.40 13.00 21.55 13.2 17.01 13.50 12.06 14.00 7.59 14.50 5.37 15.00 4.13 16.0 3.00 18.0 2.09 20.0 209 24.0 0.00 PEAT: RUNOFF FLOWS (TR -55) X44 k : *.4t * *. *4.4: * * *4: *4 *4 * ** * * * *4: *4:4:4 * *.4 * * * *44: * * ** * * * * * * ** * 44:4 * * * * *4* F'F:UJEl: VALLEY VISTA DATE = 02/14/85 DESCRIPTION= VALLEY VISTA ESTATES PE 1407 SUBAREA 1 = 450 ACRES TOTAL AREA = 450 ACRES BASIN INPUT DATA CALCULATED VALUES TABULAR HYDROGRAPH DESIGNER= G. NELSON BASIN STREAM RAINFALL = 2.4 INCHES HYDF:AULIC LENGTH = 7500 FEET WATERSHED SLOPE = 13 PERCENT TRAVEL TIME = 0 HOURS S = 5.15 0 = .29 INCHES LAG = .66 HOURS Tc = 1.09 HOURS VOLUME = 446.772.08 C.F. MAX RUNOFF = 60.02 C.F.S. HOURS RUNOFF IN C.F.S. 10.0 0.00 11.0 2.48 11.5 4.63 11.70 8.50 11.80 12.23 11.90 19.55 12.00 27.76 12.10 37.89 12.20 46.87 12.30 54.74 12.40 58.52 12.50 60.02 12.60 58.64 12.70 55.28 12.80 50.64 12.90 45.69 13.00 40.35 13.2 31.86 13.50 22. 58 14.00 14.22 14:50 10.05 15.00 7.73 16.0 5.61 18.0 3.92 20.0 _ 3.92 • 24.0 0.00 HYDROGRAPH DESIGN S.C.S. TR -55 METHOD SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER = 66 COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER = 66.00 - t t *: * * *: *: *'k A: * *4 : ** *1 *TWWtr.x3ra.a.raq.a.ne.,.nT PROJECT: 'VALLEY 'VISTA DRAINAGE BAST STREAM / 0 STORM EVENT FREQUENCY: YEARS CONDITIONS: BEFORE DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA---- - - ----- 450 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE. NUMBER 66 SLOPE— 13 HYDRALULIC LENGTH — 7500 FEET - PRECIPITATION 2 INCHES RESULTING RUNOFF— 31.767 CFS ************:*:*****:**:**:****************.*.*:******** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *1: * * * * * * ** PEAK. RUNOFF FLOWS (TR -55) ********************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * *rn* PROJECT: VALLEY VISTA DRAINAGE BASIN: STREAM ,sO STORM EVENT FREQUENCY: Jrt+ YEARS . CONDITIONS: BEFORE DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA 450 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER 66 -SLOPE 13 % HYDRALULIC- LENGTH 7500 FEET PRECIPITATION— 2.4 INCHES RESULTING RUNOFF 59.492 CFS T- *************:************#********************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *•t STORM WATER HYDROLOGY * * ** Retention/Detention Basin Design INFLOW FROM FILE VV ABCDE INFLOW VOLUME = 156268.00 cf POND w/ SLOPED SIDES BASE = 75 x 75 SLOPE = 5 RETENTION H OUTLETS: STAGE -Ft SUBMERGED ORIFICE HEIGHT = DIAM 9.72 ft - I�HL> — £tom - g 14.00 in STORAGE DISCHARGE_ ru ft cfs ey C15/A/C "Ns /Wine w 0^19 0.39 0.58 .0.78 0.97 1.17 1^36' 1.56 1.75 1.94 2^14 2.33 2.53 2.72 2.92 3.11 3.31 3.50 3^70 3.89 4.08 4,28 4,47 4.67 4.86 5.06 5^ 5"45 5.64 5^83 6.03 6.22 6,42 6.61 '6.81 7"00 7.20 7.39 7.58 7.78 7.97 8.17 8.36 :"56 8.75 8.95 9.14 9.34 . 9.53 9.72 MAX DISCHARGE = BASIN VOL. = BASIN DEPTH = TIME 11:40 11:50 1122.58 2303.37 3543.f]3 4845.45 6209"68 7638.01 9131.90 10692.82 12322.25 14021.65 15792.50 17636.27 19554,43 21548.46 23619.81 25769.97 28000.40 30312.58 32707"98 35188.06 37754.31 40408"18 43151.16 45984.71 48910.31 51929.42 55043,52 59254.08 61562.56 64970,45 68479.21 72090.31 75805.23 79625^f3 93552^39 87587.57 91732.46 95988.52 100357.21 104840"O2 109438.42 114153.87 118987.84 123941.82 129017.26^ 134215.64 139538.44 144987:11 150563.14 156268"00 • 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00. 0.00 2.17 3.19 3.95 4.59 5.15 5"66 6.12 6.55 6.96 7^34 7.71 8.05 8.38 8.70 9.01 9.31 9.60 9.88 10.15 10.42 10.68 10.93 11.18 11.42 11.66 11.89 12.12 12"34 12.56 12.78 12.99 13.20 13"40 13:61 13.81 14.00 14.20 14.39 14.58 14.76 14.95 15.13 15.31 15.49 15.66 9.64 cfs 40763^92 cf 4.30 ft INFLOW OUTFLOW . cfs cfs � O"76 0^O0 6.33 0.00 12 :00 18.74 0.00 12:10 27.67 5.16 12:20 26.95 7.79 12:30 15.17 9.18 12:40 9.90 9.61 12:50 8.65 9.63 13:00 6.64 9.56 13:10 5.79 9.38 13:20 5.41 9.14 13:30 4.78 8.88 13:40 4.45 8:58 13:50 4.21 8.25 14:00 3.80 7.90 14:10 3.62 7.53 14 :20 3.51 7.13 14 :30 3.29 6.72 14:40 3.19 6.30 14:50 3.12 5.89 15:00 2.98 5.47 15 :10 2.91 5.07 15:20 2.85 4.68 15:30 2.68 4.30 15:40 2.58 3.96 15:50 2.483. 61 16:00 2 .3 2 _ 3.31 16:10 2 3.02 16:20 2.21 2.75 16:30 2.12 2.57 16:40 2.11 2.42 16:50 2.13 2.31 17 :00 2.12 2.24 17 :10 2.10 2.20 17:20 2.07 2.16 17:30 2 .00 2.09 17 :40 1.96 2.03 17:50 1.92 1.98 18 :00 1.83 1.93 18:10 1.77 1.87 18:20 1.71 1.80 18:30 1.61 1.74 18:40 1.59 1.66 18 :50 1.60 1.61 19:00 1.59 1.60 19 :10 1.60 1.59 19:20 1.61 1.59 19:30 1.60 1.60 19:40 1.57 1.60 19 :50 1.53 1.57 20 :00 1.46 1.54 20:10 1.45 1.49 20:20 1.46 1.46 20:30 1.45 1.46 20:40 1.46 1.45 20 :50 1.47 1.45 21:00 1.46 1.46 21:10 1.41 1.45 21:20 1.36 1.42 21 :30 1.27 1.38 21:40 1.25 1.31 21:50 1.26 1.27 22:00 1.25 1.25 22 :10 1.25 1.25 22 :20 1.26 1.25 22:30 1.25 1.25 22:40 1.26 1.25 22:50 1.27 1.26 23:00 23:10 23:20 23:30 23:40 23:50 24:00 24:10 24:20 24:30 24:40 2450 25:O0 25:10 25:20 1.26 1.23 1.17 1.[\9 1"O6 1.07 1.06 0.83 0.43 '0.07 0.00 0^00 0^00 0.00 0.00 1.26 1"26 1.23 1.19 1.12 1"09 1.07 1.05 0.90 0.60 0.28 0"11 0.04 0.02 O"O1 * * ** STORM WATER HYDROLOGY * * ** SOS Curve Number Method WATERCOURSE TYPES: 1 FOREST w/ HEAVY GROUND LITTER 2 MINIMUM TILLAGE CULTIVATION SHORT GRASS PASTURE & LAWNS 4 NEARLY BARE GROUND 5 GRASSED WATERWAY 6 PAVED AREA 7 OTHER 24 HOUR STORM TYPE II DISTRIBUTION * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** VALLEY VISTA BASIN A INIT Tc = 5.00 min TYPE LENGTH %SLOPE VEL TIME k/A LLEY vls i A A FTER Nyo &o & APH c(S ./AX patsor -t 1 AO L6 fry /^0x 3..33 INPUT VARIABLES: AREA = 22.00 acres PRECIP = 2:40 in CN • 72.00 TOTAL Tc = 10.35 min UNIT HYDRnGRAPH: D � 3.00 min Tp 7.71 min Tr 12.85 min Op 129.53 cfs RUNOFF: THIS AREA = TOTAL = MAX RATE = TIME RATE min cfs 38133"87 c+ 38133.87 cf . 9"43 cfs •720 9.43 750 2.65 780 1.48 810 1.13 840 0.90 870 0.79 900 0.71 930 0.65 960 0.56 990 O"51 1020 0.52 1050 0.48 1080 0.44 1110 0.39 1140 0.39 1170 0.39 . 1.200 0.36 1230 0^36 1260 0.36 1290 0.30 1320 0.30 1350 0,30 • 1380 0;30 1410 0.26 1440 0.26 HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV A ********************$*****$* VALLEY VIEW BASIN B INIT Tc = 5.00 mi TYPE LENGTH %SLOPE .VEL TIME 5 1350.00 10"70 4.91 4.59 INPUT VARIABLES: AREA = 13.00 . acres PRECIP = 2.40 in CN 72.00 TOTAL Tc = 9.' min urvi 1 nrunLunHr - fl D = 2.73 min Tp • = 7. min Tr = 11.L- min Op = 82.91 cfs RUNOFF: THIS AREA = 22533.65 cf TOTAL = 22533.65 cf MAX RATE = 5.79 cfs TIME RATE min cfs 720 3.76 750 1.53 780 0.87 810 0.67 840 0.54 ' 870 0.47 900 0.43 • 930 0.39 960 0.33 990 0.31 1020 0.31 1050 0.29 1080 0.27 1110 0.23 1140 0.23 1170 0.23 1200 0.21 1230 0.21 1260 0.21 1290 0.18 1320 0.18 1350 0.18 1380 0.18 1410 0.16 1440 0.16 HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE Qv B * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** VALLEY VIEW BASIN C INIT Tc = 5.00 min TYPE LENGTH %SLOPE VEL TIME 5 1350.00 1 1 . 80 . 5.15 4.37 INPUT VARIABLES: AREA = 13.50 acres PRECIP = 2.40 in ON = 73.00 TOTAL Tc = 9.37 min UNIT HYDROGRAPH: D = 2.73 min Tp = 6.98 min Tr = 11.64 min Op = 87.72 cfs RUNOFF: THIS AREA = 25207.16 cf llif-IL 1 V.` !+/ 10 LT MAX RATE = 6.52 cfs TIME RATE min cfs 720 2.99 750 1.68 780 0.96 810 0.74 840 0.59 870 0.52 900 0.47 930 0.43 960 0.36 990 0.34 1020 0.34 1050 0.32 1080 0.29 1110 0.25 1140 0.25 1170 0.25 1200 0.23 12.30 0.23 23 1260 0.23 1290 0.20 1320 0.20 1350 0.20 1380 0.20 1410 0.17 1440 • 0.17 HYDRO(3RAFH STORED IN FILE VV C * * ** **t * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * ** VALLEY VISTA BASIN D INIT Tc = 5.00 min TYPE LENGTH %SLOPE VEL TIME -5 2150.00 11.60 5.11 7.01 INPUT VARIABLES: AREA = 31.50 acres PRECIP = 2.40 in ON = 73.00 TOTAL Tc = 12.01 rain UNIT HYDROGRAPH: D = 3.33 min Tp = 8.88 rni.n Tr = 14.79 min Op = 161.07 cfs RUNOFF: THIS AREA = 58816.71 cf TOTAL = 58816.71 cf MAX RATE = 14.64 cfs * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** VALLEY VISTA BASIN E INIT Tc -- - 5.' min TYPE LENGTH %SLOPE VEL TIME INPUT VARIABLES: AREA _ - 6...4- acres PRECIP = 2.40 in CN = 73.00 TOTAL Tc = 8.31 min UNIT HYDROGRAPH: D = 2.31 min Tp • ' = 6.14 min Tr = 10.24 min Qp = 45.81 cfs RUNOFF: THIS AREA = 11576.62 cf TOTAL = 11576.62 cf - MAX RATE = 3.12 cfs HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV E TIME min RATE cfs 720 0.43 750 1.22 780 0.50 810 0.35 840 0.28 870 0.24 900 0.22 930 0.70 960 0.17 990 0.15 1020 0. 15 1050 0.14 1080 0.13 1110 0.12 1140 0.12 1170 0.12 1200 0.11 1230 0.11 1260 0.11 1290 0.09 1320 0.09 1..° +50 0.09 1380 0.09 1410 0.08 1440 0.08 1470 0.01 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * ** STORM WATER HYDROLOGY * * ** SCS Curve Number Method WATERCOURSE TYPES: 1 FOREST w/ HEAVY GROUND LITTER 2 MINIMUM TILLAGE CULTIVATION SHORT GRASS PASTURE & LAWNS 4 NEARLY BARE GROUND 5 GRASSED WATERWAY o rHvC.0 *I7(C* 7 OTHER 24 HOUR STORM TYPE II DISTRIBUTION ******************************** VALLEY VISTA BASIN D INIT Tc = 5.00 min TYPE LENGTH %SLOPF VEL TIME 5 2150.00 11.60 5.11 7.01 INPUT VARIABLES: AREA 31.50 acres PRECIP 2.40 in CN 73.00 TOTAL Tc = 12.01 min UNIT HYDROGRAPH: D • - 3.33 min Tp 8.88 min Tr - 14,79 min Op .= 161.07 cfs RUNOFF: THIS AREA = 58816.71 cf TOTAL = 58816.71 cf MAX RATE = 14.64 cfs HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV D TIME RATE min cfs • 720 2.13 750, 8.09 780 2.84 810 1.90 840 1.49 870 1.27 900 1.15 970 1,02 960 • 0.89 990 0.81 1020 0.79 1050 0.76 1080 0.70 1110 0.62 1140 0"60 117() 0.60 1200 0.57 1230 0.55 1260 0.56 1290 0.50 1320 ^ 0.47 1350 0.48 1380 0.48 1410 0.42 1440 0.39 1470 0.05 ADD VV A numurrg THIS AREA = 38133.87 cf TOTAL = 96950"' cf MAX RATE = . 17.�' cfs ADD VV B RUNOFF: THIS AREA = 22533.65 cf TOTAL 119484.22 cf MAX RATE = 19.89 cfs ADD VV C RUNOFF: THIS AREA = 25207.16 cf TOTAL 144691^38 cf MAX RATE = 25.74 cfs ADD VV E RUNOFF: THIS AREA = 11576,62 cf TOTAL = 156268.00 cf MAX RATE � � 28.07 cfs HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV ABCDE TIME RATE min cfs 720 18.74 750 15.17 780 6.64 810 4.78 840 3.80 070 3.29 900 2.98 930 • 2.68 960 2 .3 2 990 2.12 1020 2.12 1050 2" 1080 1.83 1110 1.61 1140 • 1.59 1170 1.60 1200 1.46 1230 1.45 1260 1.46 1290 1.27. 1320 1.25 1350 1.25 1380 1.26 1410 1.09 1440 1.06 1470 0.07 * * ** STORM WATER HYDROLOGY * * ** SCS Curve Number Method WATERCOURSE TYPES: 1 FOREST w/ HEAVY GROUND LITTER 2 MINIMUM TILLAGE CULTIVATION 3 SHORT GRASS PASTURE & LAWNS 4 NEARLY BARE GROUND 5 GRASSED WATERWAY 6 PAVED AREA 7 OTHER 24 HOUR STORM TYPE II DISTRIBUTION ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *)k * * * * * * * ** VALLEY VIEW— BASIN A— BEFORE INIT Tc = 5.00 min TYPE LENGTH %SLOPE VEL 5 1300.00 7.30 4.05 INPUT VARIABLES: AREA = 22.00 acres PRECIP = 2.40 in CN = 66.00 TOTAL Tc = 10.35 min UNIT HYDROGRAPH: D = 3.00 min Tp = 7.71 min Tr = 12.85 min Op = 129.53 cfs RUNOFF: THIS AREA = 22974.71 cif TOTAL = 22974.71 c MAX RATE = 4.70 cfs TIME HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV AI:1F TIME RATE min cfs 720 4.42 750 1.67 VALLEY V/ 7;1 C3 E Foe fr/YED46, cfs/ N 6r Y 780 0 97 810 0.76 840 0.61 870 0.55 900 0.50 930 0.46 960 0.40 990 0.36 1020 0.37 1050 0.35 1090 0.32 1110 0.28 1 140 0.29 1170 0.29 1200 0.26 1230 0,26 1260 0.27 1290 0.22 1320 0.22 1350 - 0.22 1380 0.23 1410 0.20 1440 0.20 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** VALLEY VISTA- BASIN B- BEFORE INIT Tc = 5.00 min TYPE LENGTH %SLOPE VEL TIME 5 1350.00 10.70 4.91 4.59 INPUT VARIABLES: AREA = 13.00 acres PRECIP = 2.40 in CN = 66.00 TOTAL Tc = 9.59 min UNIT HYDROGRAPH: D 2;73 min Tp = 7.1 min Tr = 11.86 min Op =- 82.91 cfs RUNOFF: THIS AREA = 13575.96 cf TOTAL = 13575.96 cf MAX RATE = 2.98 cfs HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV BBF TIME RATE min cfs 720 1.03 750 0.95 780 0.57 810 0..45 840 0.37 870 0.32 900 0.30 930 0.27 960 0.23 990 0.22 1 . 020 0.22 1050 1 080 1110 1140 1170 1200 1230 1260 1290 1320 1350 1380 1410 1440 0.21 0.19 0.17 0.17 0.17 ' 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.12. 0.12 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** VALLEY VISTA- BASIN C- BEFORE INIT Tc -= 5.00 min TYPE LENGTH %SLOPE VEL TIME 5 1350.00 11.80 5.15 4.37 INPUT VARIABLES: AREA = 13.50 acres PRECIP = 2.40 it CN • = 66.00 TOTAL Tc = 9.37 min UNIT HYDROGRAPH: D = 2.73 min Tp = 6.98 min Tr = 11.64 min Op = 87.72 cfs RUNOFF THIS AREA = 14098.12 cf TOTAL = 14098.12 cf MAX RATE = 3.11 cfs HYDROGF:APH STORED IN FILE VV CBF TIME RATE min cfs 720 0.28 750 0.96 780 0.59• 810 0.47 840 0.38 870 0.34 900 .0.31 930 0.29 960 0.25 990 0.23 1020 0.23 1050 0.22 1080 0.20 1110 0.17 1140 0.18 1170 0.18 1200 0.16 1230 '0.16' 1260 0.16 1290 0.14 1320 1350 138(\ 1410 1440 0.14 0,14 0.14 0.12 0.12 *$$********$*******************$ VALLEY VIEW- BASIN D- BEFORE INIT Tc = 5"00 min TYPE LENGTH %SLOPE VEL TIME 5 2150.00 11.60 5.11 7"01 INPUT VARIABLES: AREA 31"50 acres PRECIP 2.40 in CN 66.00 TOTAL Tc = 12"01 min UNIT HYDROGRAPH: D � 3.33 min Tp 8.88 min Tr - 14.79 min Op 161.07 cfs RUNOFF: THIS AREA = TOTAL = MAX RATE = TIME RATE min cfs 720 0,02 750 4.24 780 1.71 810 1.19 840 0.96 870 0.83 900 0"76 . 930 0.68 960 0.60 990 0.55 1020 0.54 1050 0.52 1080 0.48 1110 0.43 1140 0"41 1170 0.42 1200 0.40 1230 0.39 1260 0.39 1290 0.35 1320 0^34 1350 0"34 1380 0.34 1410 0.30 1440 0.28 1470 0.04 32895"60 cf 32895.60 cf 6.30 cfs HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV DBF ******************************** VALLEY VISTA- BASIN E- BEFORE INIT Tc = 5.00 min TYPE LENGTH %SLOPE ;L TIME 5 1100.00 13.60 5.53 3.31 INPUT VARIABLES: AREA = 6.20 acres PRECIP = 2.40 in CN = 66.00 TOTAL Tc = 8.31 min UNIT HYDROGRAPH: D = 2.31 min Tp = 6.14 min Tr = 10.24 min Op = 45.81 cfs RUNOFF: THIS AREA = 6474.69 cf TOTAL = 6474.69 cf MAX RATE = 1.43 cfs HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV ERE TIME RATE min cfs 750 0.66 780 0.30 810 0.22 840 0.18 870 0.16 900 0.15 930 0.13 960 0.11 990 0.10 1020 0.10 1050 0.10 1080 0.09 1110 0.08 1140 0.08 1170 0.08 1200 0.08 1230 0.07 1260 0.09. 1290 0.07 1320 0.06 1350 0.07 1380 0.07 1410 0.06 1440 0.05 1470 0.01 ADD VV DBF RUNOFF: THIS AREA = 32895.60 cf TOTAL = 39370.29 cf MAX RATE = 7.73 cfs ADD VV CBE RUNOFF: THIS AREA = 14098.12 cf TOTAL = 53468.41 cf MAX RATE = 10.00 cfs ADD VV BBF RUNOFF: THIS AREA = J3575"96 cf TOTAL = 67044.37 cf MAX.RATE = 11.30 cfs ADD VV ABF RUNOFF: THIS AREA -= 22974.71 cf TOTAL = 90019.08 cf MAX RATE = 12.90 cft HYDROGRAPH STORED IN FILE VV ME' TIME RATE min cfs 700 0"00 710 0.97 720 5.75 730 10.33 740 12.90 750 8"4B 760 5.94 770 5.28 780 4.14 790 3.66 800 3.45 810 3^08 820 2.89 830 2.75 840 2.50 850 2.40 860 2,33 870 2.20 880 2.14 890 2.10 900 2^02 910 1.97 920 1.93 930 1.83 940 1"76 950 1.70 960 .1"59 970 1"55 980 1.53 990 1.47 :1O00 1.46 1010 1.48 1020 1.48 1030 1.47 • 1040 1,45 1050 1.40 1060 1.37 1070 ' 1.35 1080 1.2'9 1090 1.25 1100 1.20 1110 1.13 1120 1.12 113(} 1.13 1140 1.13 1150 1160 1170 1180 1190 1200 1210 1220 1230 1240 1250 1260 1270 1280 1290 1300 1310 1320 1330 1340 1350 1360 1370 1380 1390 1400 1410 1420 1430 1440 1450 1460 1470 1.14 1.15 1.14 1.12 1..09 1.04 1.04 1.05 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.05 1.02 0.98 0.91 0.90 0.91 0.90 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.91 0.89 0.85 0.79 0.77 0.78 0.77 0.60 0.31 0. 05 PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR -55) ************************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** PROJECT: VALLEY VISTA ESTATES DRAINAGE BASIN: STREAM STORM EVENT FREQUENCY: 10 YEARS CONDITIONS: BEFORE DEVELOPMENT ��w � DRAINAGE AREA 450 ACRES 6i, K - R UNOFF CURVE NUMBER SLOPE HYDRALULIC LENGTH PRECIPITATION RESULTING RUNOFF 13 Y. 7 FEET V 503/4404" INCHES 0- 16.546 CFS ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** / frkAP5 P li 3 M'` DITCH CALCULATIONS S= .0082 ft/ft Sc= 1.82851129063E-2 ft/ft V= 2.92820220234 fps Vc= 3"85387502378 fps D= .680242486772 ft Dc= .539535697112 ft Q= 10 cfs L= 300 ft n= .03 Tt= 1.70753235415 min TRAPFZOIDALCHANNEL B= 4 ft Lt SS= 1.5 :1 Rt SS= 1.5 :1 DITCH CALCULATIONS S": .0082 ft/ft Sc= 1.72643784987E-2 ft/ft V= 3.31914533663 fps Vc= 4,29984283463 fps D= "855410954594 ft Dc= .692362640012 ft 0= 15 cfs L= 300 ft n= .03 Tt= 1"50641189008 min TRAPEZQIDALCHANNEL B= 4 ft Lt SS= 1.5 :1 Rt SS= 1.5 :1 DITCH CALCULATIONS S= .0082 ft /ft Sc = 1.65945792787E -2 ft /ft V= 3.63636363636 fps Vc= 4.63457797069 fps D= 1 ft Dc= .824142692128 ft Q= 20 cfs L= 300 ft n= .03 Tt= 1.375 mi n TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL 8= 4 ft Lt SS= 1.5 :1 Rt SS= 1.5 :1 DITCH CALCULATIONS S= .0082 ft /ft Sc= .013655509425 ft /ft V= 2.92820220234 fps Vc= 3.49088315572 fps D= .680242486772 ft Dc= .586956797898 ft Q= 10 cfs L= 300 ft n= .03 Tt= 1.70753235415 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 4 ft Lt SS= 1.5 :1 Rt SS= 1.5 :1 Stir lcz Vtat_, 6 i V isnt �Srp r�5 ReL.«41.,eo 1 Cam, N L.Kttit NGSts.cev -j 1Im4ISS DITCH CALCULATIONS S= .0082 ft /ft Sc= 1.36468337165E -2 ft /ft V= 3.31914533663 fps Vc= 3.96515416047 fps D= .855410954594 ft Dc= .740249994774 ft Q= 15 cf=_. L= 300 ft n= .03 Tt= 1.50641189008 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL 8= 4 ft Lt SS= 1.5 :1 Rt SS= 1.5 :1 Si.r c.e.3 V d \ t srx 2et_acm sue C+0. SAINE �.- L K(L -._.u-)CS n 1 /241 /1 DITCH CALCULATIONS S= .0082 ft /ft Sc= 1.37366767059E -2 ft /ft V= 3.63636363636 fps V'c= 4.339033246 fps D= 1 ft Dc= .86908781079 ft Q= 20 cfs L= 300 ft n= .03 Tt= 1.375 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 4 ft Lt SS= 1.5 :1 Rt SS= 1.5 :1 S i.a-r 3oF3 VAt -s-e -i SrA Esrr.Lncs L- lC «••■• C..442471 , 1 l 2 44 s DITCH CALCULATIONS 8= °0082 ft/ft Sc= 1"44027420693E-2 ft/ft V= 4.92462597653 fps Vc= 6.05708015507 fps D= 1.81312849524 ft • Dc= 1.56176938057 ft Q= 60 cfs L= 1000 ft n= "03 Tt= 3,38435177537 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 4 ft Lt SS= 1.5 :1 At SS= 1.5 :1 � / � DATE= 02/14/85 HYDROGRAPH DESIGN S.C.S. TR-55 METHOD DESIGNER= G. NELSON DESCRIPTION= VALLEY VISTA ESTATES PE 1407 SUBAREA 1 = 450 ACRES TOTAL AREA = 450 ACRES BASIN INPUT DATA CALCULATED VALUES TABULAR HYDROGRAPH RAINFALL = 2.4 INCHES HYDRAULIC LENGTH = 7500 FEET WATERSHED SLOPE = 13 PERCENT TRAVEL TIME = 0 HOURS S = 5.15 0 = .29 INCHES LAG = .66 HOURS Tc = 1.09 HOURS VOLUME = 446,772.08 C.F. MAX RUNOFF = 60.02 C.F.S. HOURS RUNOFF IN C.F.S. 10.0 0.00 11.0 2.48 11,5 4"63 11"70 8.50 11.80 12.23 11,90 19.55 12.00 27.76 12"10 37.89 12.20 46.87 12"30 54.74 12.40 58.52 12.50 60.02 12.60 58.64 12.70 55.28 12.86 50.64 12.90 45.69 13.00 40.35 13.2 31.86 13.50 22.58 14.00 14.22 14.50 10.05 15,00 7.73 16"0 5.61 18.0 3.92 20.0 3.92 24.0 0"00 BASIN STREAM SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER = 66 COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER = 66.00 DATE = 02/14/85 DESCRIPTION= VALLEY VISTA ESTATES PE 1407 SUBAREA 1 = 450 ACRES TOTAL AREA = 450 ACRES BASIN INPUT DATA CALCULATED VALUES TABULAR HYDROGRAPH DESIGNER= G. NELSON BASIN STREAM RAINFALL = 2 'INCHES HYDRAULIC LENGTH = 7500 FEET WATERSHED SLOPE = 13 PERCENT TRAVEL TIME = 0 HOURS S = 5.15 0 = .15 INCHES LAG = .66 HOURS Tc = 1.09 HOURS VOLUME = 238,561.31 C.F. MAX RUNOFF = 32.05 C.F.S. HOURS RUNOFF IN C.F.S. 10.0 0.00 11.0 1.32 11.5 2.47 11.70 4.'54 11.80 6.53 11.90 10.44 12.00 14.82 12.10 20.23 12.20 25.03 12.30 29.23 12.40 31.25 12.50 32.05 12.60 31.31 12.70 29.52 12.80 27.04 12.90 24.40 13.00 21.55 13.2 17.01 13.50 12.06 14..00 7.59 14.50 5.37 15.00 4.13 16.0 3.00 18.0 2.09 20.0 2.09 24.0 0.00 ' HYDROGRAPH DESIGN S.C.S. TR -55 METHOD SUBAREA 1 RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER = 66 COMPOSITE CURVE NUMBER = 66.00 • PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR -) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. 4************************ PROJECT: VALLEY VISTA LRHIIVHOM DHO114G OIRCHI1 /0 STORM EVENT F °EQUENCY: S€+ YEARS CONDITIONS: 'ORE DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA 450 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER - -- 66 SLOPE 13 7.. HYDRALLLIC LENGTH 7500 FEET PRECIPITATION 2 INCHES RESULTING RUNOFF 31.767 CFS PEAK RUNOFF FLOWS (TR -55) *********************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** PROJECT: VALLEY VISTA DRAINAGE BASIN: STREAM 5D STORM EVENT FREQUENCY: 4+? YEARS CONDITIONS: BEFORE DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA 450 ACRES RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER - - -- • 66 SLOPE 1 HYDRALULIC LENGTH 7500 FEET PRECIPITATION 2.4 INCHES RESULTING RUNOFF 59.492 CFS ************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ', FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO • AUTO INV * * * ** START 1650.94549 992.38769 50 INV CURVE RADIAL N 4 10 39.0 W DELTA - 8 28 03.0 RT RAD 440.0000 TAN 32.5722 L -ARC 65.0257 , RADIAL N 4 17 24.0 E RP 1212.11450 1024.44017 51 50 CHORD S 89 56 37.5 E 64.9666 1650.88171 1057.35423 TAN®PT S 85 42 36.0 E 52 INV S 85 42 36.0 E 545.7600 1610,05631 1601.58512 INV CURVE RADIAL S 4 17 24.0 W DELTA 50 09 44.0 LT RAD 380.0600 TAN 177.8523 L -ARC ' 332.6885. RADIAL S 45 52 20.0 E RP 1988.99162 1630.01090 54 53 CHORD N 69 12 32.0 E 322.1647 1724.41249 1902.77066 55 TAN @PT N 44 07 40.0 E 55 INV N 44 07 40.0 E 365.6600 1986.87915 2157.36541 56 INV CURVE RADIAL S 45 52 20.0 E DELTA 26 02 31.0 LT RAD 380.0000 TAN 87.8764 L -ARC 172.7167 RADIAL S 71 54 51.0 E RP 2251.45829 1884.60565 57 56 CHORD N 31 06 24.5 E 171.2338 2133.49055 2245.83081 58 TAN @PT N 18 05 09.0 E• 58 INV N 18 05 09.0 E 117.3000 2244.99506 2282.24559 59 INV CURVE RADIAL N 71 54 51.0 W DELTA 7 07 47.0 RT RAD 440.0000 TAN 27.4115 L -ARC 54.7523 RADIAL N 64 47 04.0 W RP 2108.40084 59 CHORD N 21 39 02.5 E 54.7170 2295.85181 2302.43327 TANI'PT N 25 12 56.0 E 61 INV S 81 17 57.0 W 34.6100 2290.61618 2268.22157 INV CURVE RADIAL N 8 42 03.0 W DELTA 21 18 41.0 LT RAD 135.0000 TAN 25.4004 L -ARC 50.2138 RADIAL N 30 00 44.0 W RP 2157.16980 2288.64372 63 62 CHORD S 70 38 36.5 W 49.9248 2274.06883 2221.11878 • (6 TAN&PT S 59 59 16.0 W 64 INV S 59 59 17.0 W 125.9400 2211.07609 2112.06467 65-) 'f P.IU I'll !PUP Cr) 5c 2700.50629 60 61 RADIAL N 30 00 43.0 W DELTA 36 10 42.0 LT RAD 135.0000 TAN 44.0966 L-ARC 85.2432 RADIAL N 66 11 25.0 W •-RP 65 CHORD S 41 53 56.0 W TAN'PT S 23 48 35. 0 W 67 INV 8 2 3 4 8 3 5 . 0 14 INV CURVE RADIAL S 66 11 25.0 E DELTA 32 08 54.0 RT RAD 230.0000 TAN 66.2738 L -ARC 129.0517 RADIAL S 34 02 31.0 E - RP 68 CHORD S 39 53 02.0 W TANG'PT 8 55 57 29.0 W 70 .INV S 55 57 29.0 W INV CURVE RADIAL S 34 02 31.0 E DELTA 37 26 29.0 RT RAD 230.0000 TAN • '77.9433 L -ARC 150.2994 RADIAL S 3 23 58.0 W RP 71 CHORD S 74 40 43.5 W TANG'PT N 86 36 02.0 W 73 INV N 86 36 02.0 W INV CURVE RADIAL N 3 23 58.0 E DELTA 19, 34 21.0 LT RAD 225.0000 TAN 38.8086 L -ARC 76.8610 RADIAL N 16 10 23.0 W RP 74 CHORD S 83 36 47.5 W TAN'_'PT S 73 49 37.0 W 79 INV S 73 49 37.0 W INV CURVE RADIAL S 16 10 23.0 E DELTA 3 21 12.0 RT RAD 1200.0000 TAN 35.1261 L -ARC 70.2320 RADIAL S 12 49 11.0 E RP 80 CHORD S 75 30 13.0 W TAN@PT 8 77 10 49.0 W 82 INV S 77 10 49:0 W 83 INV S 0 40 12.0 E 8.7.8.341 39.3500 127. 3655 222.4900 2080.97664 1645.40671 72 147. 6.393 1851 .381 35 1631 .76847 73 276.6800 1867.78755 1355.57572 74 76.4879 63.3800 70.2220 164.0100 136.7200 2094.17673 2148. 67631 2112.67534 2205.52647 2014.94203 1890.39220 1643.18346 1859.27904 1841.62521 2994.13494 1824.04730 1787.65608 1650.94543 LAT gr DEP 0.00006 84 HCLOSE N 89 28 11.1 E 0.0066 1650.94549 PREC =1 TO 494374 290332.35ft 6.6651ac 2179.58905 2056.07874 2040.19312 1829.76815 69 1958.52207 70 1774.1606: , 71 1342.23356 78 1279.56218 79 1218.69045 80 884. 443 08 1 1150.70406 82 990.78233 83 992.38106 84 0.00663 992.38769 50 r CHAR 2 COORDINATES IN FEET SCALE 1 "= 50 1: 600 NW COR 2300N 1148E SE COR 1625N 1523E POINT 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 75 76 81 OFF SCALE WORK FILE: DESC COORDINATES IN FEET SCALE 1 "= 50 1: 600 ROTATION - 67.2021 AT POINT 62 RIGHT 7.25 DOWN .25 POINT 75 76 78 81 OFF SCALE • 62 • +64 °65 n63 '66 069 072 067 068 070 071 077 432 43 0 P79 074 P73 WORK; FILE: DESC DESC 2 TO 36 2 1650.94549N 992.38769E 3 1212.11450N 1024.44017E 4 1650.88171N 1057.35423E 5 1610. 05631 N 1601.58512E 6 1988.99162N 1630.01090E 7 1724.41249N 1902.77066E 8 1986.87915N 2157.336541E 9 2251.45829N 1884.60565E 10 2133.49055N 2245.83081E 11 2244.99506N 2282.24559E 12 2108.40084N 2700.50629E 13 2295.85181N 2302.43327E 14 2290.61618N 2268.22157E 15 2157.16980N 2288.64372E 16 2274.06883N 2221.11878E 17 2236.49526N 2156.07079E 18 2119.59591N 2223.59516E 19 2174.09548N 2100.08485E 20 2151.16831N 2089.96811E 21 2334.85206N 1673.69263E 22 1958.86922N 1929.9.842E 23 1899.90411N 1843.42133E 24 2151.93573N 1671.65096E 25 1853.08496N 1732.58713E 26 1847.90678N 1707.18971E 27 2372.12003N 1600. 30167E 28 1841.63696N 1530.92792E 29 1863.67188N 1.362.43262E 30 1640.57153N 1333.25674E 31 1856.66710N 1270.58536E 32 1841.61761N 1218.69361E 33 2994.12735N 884.44623E 34 1824.03971N 1150.70721E 35 1787.64849N 990.78548E 36 1650.93784N 992.38421E END LIST Inter- office Communication To PE," I Rigid From Subject C-r. s-0 0.1 We he eor A� OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date VALE E . / o) 5/9 s' 19 "t" L..n 3 S o A v•^ S C...J C r 3 1 S ±e �c.- S a w e. G OW.... I nC44L r t ,r\ --14.e 0.1 tce ,,,..v.", • Age we o ;; Il;"-i o ___ -I-LE o4Ler o r.e3'. Sf Y.O-4 j we 31,.ovS be . \dot, SCe01".(d look A+ Se (<e Vi ST A - 1' a st. e wA. - hht ‘, v. *er ° ISr-:k et eci...0 as - t-FS su‘ereSej +0. Form m —c.R. n'1 A Y n C iv. 0C r'1/4"e ... R v. t Q i I r e e,A ..)` 1 4 " 4 STATJON'OF, 6RATE=1120 , 0= ,5 EONTINUOUS GRAPE STANDARD GRATE is • , tit HsToTIgNOF ph:PiTE= 572 :& SUMP GQ: STANDARD GRATE 1.• , • . • DRAINowE GRATE 1:41:;;;! E. “.PATE= OPT/707E4i CTESIGNER= G. NELSON HDEbCkIPTION= PONDEROSA-LEFT SIDE 4.4 ASTAT1ON,0F GROTE 1551 CONTINUOUS GRADE STANDARD GRATE S= :0063' HOTTER FLOW =;. 2,67 CFS, . O INTERCEPTED = Lr y . • O BYPASS = 1.44 .OFS ;t• „ ; • H= .016 BUTTER FLOW 1. 94 ,CFS - fib O INTERCEPTED, =•.-: 160 q. . .T.•s o DYPPI •, . 4 CFE••,,..i, t • e •: , • ;!. N - .016. .; , . GUTTER FLOW = 1,36 Crk;,;11 t GROTE C ,;22 ARACILfY'ff 7.2;.CFS,,,,,: H74:14 imoDERmINATE ELN4 >•?..w • . • • • , • ' • ` • ;• •4. PROJECT: VALLEY.:VD5 • t? " kt •:••••.• • ' - • ..4•P - , •;;72. To: Gary Nelson, Spokane County Engineering Department From: James P. Emacio, Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Re: Proposed changes to standard stormwater agreement Date: April 1, 1985 You have advised that Art Noll is desirous of meeting his obligation to design and construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together with all appurtenant facilities by including the same within an RID formed for the roads in the subdivision. You have further provided me with a proposed agreement which Mr. Noll has drafted for review. It is the recommendation of the Prosecuting Attorney's office that instead of using the form as provided by Mr. Noll the standard form be used and that an additional paragraph be added to that form with provides materially as follows: 18. Developer's option to meet obligation to design and construct by RID. - -The parties agree that the Developer may meet his obligation to design and construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together with all appurtenant facilities as described in paragraph 1 herein by inclusion of such improvements within the improvements of a road improvement district (RID) formed pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW. In the event that the developer opts to meet his obligation to design and construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility , together with all appurtenant facilities by inclusion of the same within the improvements of a RID formed for road improvements and stormwater improvements, the parties agree that Paragraphs 2, 3, 5, 7, and 13 of this agreement shall be null and void. Provided further that if the RID option is selected by the Developer paragraph 1 shall be modified as follows: 1. Construction - -The County shall construct a stormwater collection system and disposal facility, together will all appurtenant facilities. Such construction shall be included in a RID formed for such purpose pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW. The design shall conform to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80 -1592 as amended. There shall be no cost to the County for the design or construction of the Subdivision Stormwater System. All costs associated with the design and construction shall be included in the RID and allocated to properties within the boundaries of the RID as provided for in County ordinances concerning road improvement district assessments. Provided further that paragraph 7 shall be modified as follows: 7. Acceptance - -The developer shall advise all persons, firms or corporations employed by him to sell lots within the Subdivision of the necessity of the County's acceptance of the Subdivision Stormwater System for operation and maintenance prior to the establishment of the road and occupancy of any dwelling units and /or lots on the property serviced by the Subdisision 1 Stormwater System. Acceptance by the County shall be formal acceptance by the Spokane County Engineer of the construction of the Subdivision Stormwater System referred to herein. 2 FROM ANGLE ^~--^-~-- AUTO INV- CO ORDINATES FOR "peNB" ***** START 1 INV N '0 40 12.0 W 2 INV S 4 10 39.0 E 3 INV N 4 17 24.0 E INV S 85 42 36.0 E 5 INV N. 4 17 24.0 E 6 INV S 45 52 20.0 E 7- INV N 44 07 40.0 E. 8 INV N 45 52 20.0 W' 9 INV S 71 54 51.0 E. :--40 INV N 18 05 09:0 E 11 INV . S 71 54 51"0 E 12 INV N 64 47 04.0 W ~- INV S 81 17 57.0 W , 14 INV S 8 42 03,0 E 15 INV N 30 00 44.0 W --46 INV S 59 59 17.0 W • 17 INV, S 30 00 43;:0 E � 18 INV N 66 11\25.0 W .4-49 INV S 23 48 35L0W 20 INV N 66 11 25.0 W 21 INV S 34 16 33.0 E --22 INV S 55 43 26"0 W 23 •INV N 34 16 34.0 W 24 INV S 11 31 29.0 E � -25 INV S 78 28 31.0 14, 26 INV N 11 31 29.0 W 27 INV S 7 27 02^0 W -L28 INV N•82 32 58.0 W .29 INV S 7 27 02.0 W 30 INV N 16 10 23.0 W -^34 INV S 73 49 37.0 W 32 INV N 16 10 23,0 W. 33 INV S 12 49 11"0'E - INV S 77 10 49.0 W 35 INV S 0 40 12.0 F DIST NORTH EAST TO 3/19/86 650.9900 440.0006 ` 440.0000 545.7600 7R0"0000 380.0000 365.6600 780.0000 380.0000 117.3000 440.0000 440.0000 34"6100 135.0000 135.0000 75"1200 135.0000 135.0000 25.0600 . 455.0000 455"000O 104.7000 305.0000 305"0000 25,92*) 535.0000 535.0000 169.9700 225.0000 225.0000 54.0300 1200.0000 1200.0000 ` 16q"{}100 136.7200 1000.00000 1650.94549 1212"11450 1650.98171 1610.05631 1988.99162 1724.41249 1986.R 15 2251.45829 2133"49o55 2244.99566 2108.40084 2295.85181 2290.61618 2157.16980 2274.06883 2236.49526 2119.59591 2174"09548 2151.16831 2334.85206 1958.86922 4899.90411 2151.93573 1853..08496 1847.90638 2372.12003 1841.63696 1863.67188 1640.57153 1856.66710 1841.61761 2994.12735 1824.03971 1787.64849 165O"93784 10O0.00000 992.38769 1024.44017 1057.35423 1601.58512 1630.01090 1902.77066 2157.36541. 1884^60565 2245.83081 2282.24559 H2700"50629 - 2302^43327 2268.22157 • 2288.64372 2221.11878 2156.07079 ' 2223.59516 2100.08485 2089:96811 1673.69263 1929" 3842 1843.42133 1671.65096 1732.58713 1707^18971 � 1600,30167 1330.92792 • 1362.43262 1333,25674 • 1270.58536 1218.69361 884.44623 1150.70721 990.78548 992.38421 1 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 � . 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 J() 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21, rr t : ', `; 11 AR+ NDL< Gentlemen: A review of the road, drainage, and parking plans for the above- refer- enced plat, short plat, binding site plan, and /or building pennit has been accomplished. Areas of concern to us are indicated in red on the attached prints. Please make the corrections and resubmit than to this office in order that the review process may proceed. When the_plans are resubmitted, mark all changes on the revised print in color. If you have any questions about this review, please contact us at 456 -3600. Thank you. GSN /set Attachment 71 ' l ) l c. 4 \ N' i � � 4. , ? " 1 ' % COUNTY ENGINEER ROBERT S TURNER f1UUN1 i 1. rir.mnt ER S I'.,K. %NI: ,% .\n n1 V carom 99260 3/3 e /4"/ Pt- : VAL c•EY V s 7-A nt Sincerely, Robert S. Turner, P.F. Spokane County ingineer i aryy S. Ne son, P.E. Planning Engineer ■11„1,.0 . UVn .h n. 1. , ii 9 (5111) 456 3(7(x1 • • • DATE= 03/27/04 ,DESCRIPTION = VALLEY VISTA ESTATES SUBAREA • 1 = t16 ACRES TOTAL AREA = .16 'ACRES ,•OVERLAND FLOW VALUES • = •15 ' = 0 . N = . 9, = .0i . . ‘ CHANNEL; VALUES • L = 177 .172 • Z2 = 40 N • = .016 B = 0 = .0115 TD:= •2 COMPUTED 1 )ALUES DUP • = 5.00 ' 110 = 3.07 010 = .41 • OA = .13 . RATIONAL FEIRMOLA HYDROLOGY DESIENER :2' G. NELSON BASIN 5'4'5 TO 5/2 SUPARFA 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9 COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9 RA [{ONAL FORUbLA HYDROLOGY DATE = DES = G . NEL SON E\ASIN'3 TO 572 DESCRIf'TTON = VALLEY V1STA ESTAFE'S SUBAREA 1 = .37 ACRES �UGAREA 1 C(/NOFF CPEFH ICI ENT = .9 TOTAL AREA = .37 ACRES COMPOSlTE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9 OVERLAND FLOW VALUES C = . L = N = .4 S = .01 CHANNEL FLOW VALUES L = 403 11 = . 172 Z2 = 40 N = .0l6 = 0 S = "0l99 TD = . COMPUTED ;ALUES DUR .0V 1 = .07 010 = 1.02 . QA = 1.04 � Rrnrimm. FORMULA HYDROLOOY DATE =03/27/84 rF5IONFR s. NELSON BASIN 1120 TO 572 DESCRIPTION = VALLEY VISTA ESTATES SLJBRE( 1 5 ACRES PUDAPEA 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9 • ,TOTAL AREA = ACRES CO8FOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = .9 - • • , . OVERLAND FLOW VALUES .01 CHANNEL . FLOW VALUES L = 549 Z1 = „ 172 Z2 = 40 N = 01 D = 0 .0t72 TD = .17 • COMPUTED.' VALUES • DUR = 5.00 - 110. 010 .= 1.3e OA = 1.35 • „11 DA TE 0 DESCR.IFTI'ON:,:= VALLEY 'VISTA ESTATES . 1 ',.SUFAREA 1 :9 ACRES . SUBAREA: 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT e re. p .''t �. , a,. . TOTAL' :AREA 34 ACRES ,CON OSI•TE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT; = kLAND.-' VALUES - • .01 • HANNEI_:.FLOW : VALUES 425 .172 40 . ,.016 it . .01.72 .. 16 • 470MPUTED , VALUES DUR = 5.00 I10 • = 3.07 ;,:010 = 1.08 1.. G!.1 RATIONAL FORMULA HYDROLOGY DESIGNER = 6 NELSON . . I-ASIN' 1120 TO 1545 • 1 (i . DATE = 03/27/84 H bESEF&FlTIOW=VALLEY ViSTA ESTATES .2 ACRES -• 9yLOW ' • 1 ; a ' „ , •".2.1 , • - , viai , • .172 . • — • r, • •S; , ; qohn:TED vALutb DOR tr. 52 110 ' = 3. 07.: • • • ; 01() .55 •53 $.•• '••• •• • ' In ; 7 , • 4 ••, .;; ‘, , • •.4 7 • : 0 136._ RATIONAL FORMULA HYDROLOGY' bESIGNER n G. NELSON BASIN 1545 TO 1765 SUBAREA” 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = . 9 CONPOS UTE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = 9. „ ; e . • . - ! RATIONAL FORMULA HYDROLOGY : 4 ■ . . I ' DATE = 03/27284 -',.„ DESIGNER G. NELSON BASIN 00010 1062 . • ;„ , .. A 0 DESCR 1 PT. I ON . = VALLEY V TsTA E.T,TATE:s . . • . , • .i.‘, 0&• ,• •,;,, , . . . " gdenEAc• 1 .. .87 .ACRE8 SUBAREA 1 RUNOHr„COEFFICIENT= ' .9 , .!•:, . .f.:,4 14 ,H 7 M4ti l fAINAREA , ..= , :87 , , COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT = • =2.37 +61 0, a+ mmEC =VLLEY DATE= as«uma � � : � 2DESCRIPTION= PONDEROSA + mE STATION ORATE= 0 CONTINUO. GRADE STANDARD GRATE o» 03/10/84 'DESIGNER= s iGC Px2 me m«rlwmq. TO m+ ST !mwr GRATE= 455L • CONTINUOUS mA v STANDARD GRATE STATION.OF car= 1120 CONTINUOUS GRADE STANDARD ORATE • u ! « m«r SIGN » S= ,0087• . males y . ORATF DESIGN + . 01 S= .0A :. GUTTER FLOW S O a m ERC +D © .40 CF O BYPASS. = .10 @F5 NELSON 0 x 67 N. 2 016 GUTTER w .0 INTER CA GE( + .ma , S , GUTTER m•= 1.94 CF 2, • INTERCEPTED = 1.00 c S O BYPASS = .94 C ' ., . N• .ma s= STATION or GRATE= : GUTTER. x m = a 7s SUMP . CO amen + m«« GRATE EA •1/ 7.22 c s 1 iNDETIOINI FLOW JE =, V _ :. 1 *s \ 0 15.: • •'• DATE= 03/10/04 DESIGNER= G. NELsoN DESCRIPTION= PONDEROSA DR. RIGHT SIDE . 4 5 I Or•I 13F1 A TE= Z51 CON1 NUOIJS GE:.`iDE STflNDARD C,RA1E 1 4 • •' , STATION OF GRATE= 1120 CONTINUOUS GRADE STANDARD GRATE STATION OF GRATE= S72, SUMP . . . CO.' STANDARD GRATE E1= 0= .5 DRIIINOOK GRATE'. DESIGN “t%! : • • 4 ; i • • • j FR 0 .1 arc- VALLEY v . ft • . 016 GUTTER FLOW = .28 CFS 4.• • lig o NIERCEP TED =, ... 25 CFSI • .74 • DYPASS = CFS " . , N= ..016 • S = GUTTER FLOW = CFS { • INTERCEPTED = • DYPASS = .13 CFS, • : • • • . •.'• • 0= .92 N= .016 q= ;1.0X5=';H:.025`4. GUTTER FLOW =•1.05 CFS GRATE CAPACITY = 722 INDETERMINATE FLOW . J e < ?••. I • • •!•••' 03 • 2: • r '•• • • • AY•ti • •••• • - 1* • 7 r d .: -1.^ eld Sample No. 1 S -60¢9 r boratory No. mple from Station fset Mfr. eh . .ed _ pth _ ctural Classification Limit quid 3sticity Index iding - Maximum Size Za Passing 12" 98 96 3 1 4 „ 94. 3/8., 9/ # 4 R9 10 40 200 Factor 1 Class. & Group Index Ictor (ASTM D698 -42T): Ipt. Moist. Cont.. ax. Density city in Place )f Max. Density .st. Cont. in Place em Stabilometer Test: esistance Value "R" 69 quilibrium Swell ressure (psi) „ oretical Total Surfacing nd Bituminous Mat, esign Traffic Index is )f )e re. ;r )II 'r )e lo iv • he a D IISTRIBUTION: 'Matteis Files eneral Files listrict Engineer 'i.st. Soils Engr. 'lan. & Contracts 'dq.Loc.Engr. ureau Pub. Roads )11s Lab. .F. 26.02 (Rev.) WASHINGTON STATE HIGHWAY C0b'@1ISSION DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS Materials Laboratory Olympia SOIL TEST DATA Spokane. s" No. TM GOO7S.R. No. C,„,. Section L rso .5 04. C .st A. J. PETERS, P.E. // Ma aerials Engineer By / Date MArLN /Z, /986 O/..7l�i✓o // COORDINATES IN,FEET SCALE 1 "= 100 1: 1200 COORDINATES IN FEET SCALE 1 "= 100 1: 12cx: , ROTATION 90 NW COR 2350N 875E SE COR 1600N 2500E POINT • 1 3 12 27 OFF SCALE r DESCRIPTION FOR PARK PROPERTY A portion of land in Government Lot 9, in Section 4, T24N, R44E, W.M., Spokane County, Washington, being more par- ticularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 9; thence North 00 °40'12" West along the West line of said Section 4, a distance of 650.99 feet to the True Point of beginning for this description. Said Point being a Point of a Non - Tangent curve having a Radial Bearing South 4 °10'39" East; thence along a curve to the right (having a Delta 8 °28'03" and a Radius of 440.00 feet) 65.03 feet; thence South 85 °42'36" East a distance of 545.76 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a Delta of 50 °09'44" and a Radius 380.00 feet) 332.69 feet; thence North 44 °07'40" East a distance 365.66 feet to a point of a curve; thence along a curve to the left (having a Delta 26 °02'31" and a Radius 380.00 feet) 172.72 feet; thence North 18 °05'09" East a distance of 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a Delta 7 ° 07'47" and a Radius 440.00 feet) 54.75 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve. Said point having a Radial Bearing North 64 °47'04" West; thence South 81 °17'57" West a distance 34.61 feet to a point of a Curve; thence on a Curve to the left (having a Delta 21 °18'41" and a Radius 135.00 feet) 50.21 feet; thence South 59 °59'17" West a distance 75.12 feet to a point of a Curve; thence on a curve to the left (having a Delta 36 °10'42" and a Radius 135.00 feet) 85.24 feet; thence South 23 °48 ° 35" West a distance 25.06 feet to a point of a Curve; thence on a Curve to the right (having a delta 31 °54'52" and a Radius 455.00 feet) 253.44 feet; thence South 55 °43'26" West a distance 104.70 feet to a point of rve; thence on a Curve to the right (having a Delt- 2' 5' and a Radius 305.00 feet) 121.11 feet; thence South 8 °28'3 " est a distance 25.92 feet to a point of a Curve; thence on a Curve to the right (having a Delta 18 °58'31" and a Radius 535.00 feet) 177.18 feet; thence North 82 °32'58" West a distance of 169.93 feet to a point of a Curve; thence on a Curve to the left (having a Delta 23 ° 37'25" and a Radius 225.00 feet) 92.77 feet; thence South 73 °49'37" West a distance 54.03 feet to a point of a Curve; thence on a Curve to the right(having a Delta 3 ° 21 ° 12" and a Radius 1200.00feet) 70.23 feet; thence South 77 ° 10' 4 9" West a distance 164.01 feet to a point on the West line of said Section 4; thence South 0 °40'12" East along the West line of Section 4 a distance 136.72 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above described land containing approximately 6.24 Acres. Situate in Spokane County, State of Washington. N E ;. pF WAS • Q » COORDINATES lH FEET SCALE l"= 400 1; 480; NW COR ;000N 975E SE COR 950N 3975E POINT 33 OFF SCALE ~ • ~ 4 * * * ** START INV CURVE RADIAL N 4 10 39.0 W DELTA 8 28 03.0 RT RAD 440.0000 TAN 32.5722 L - -ARC 65.0257 . RADIAL N 4 17 24.0 E. RP 2 CHORD S 89 56 37.5 E 64.9666 TAN'PPT 8 85 42 36.0 E 4 INV S 85 42 36.0 E 545.7600 INV CURVE RADIAL S 4 17 24.0 W DELTA 50 09 44.0 LT RAD 380.0000 TAN 177.8523 L - -ARC 332.6885 RADIAL S 45 52'20.0 E RP 5 CHORD N 69 12 32.0 E 322. 1647 TAN@PT N 44 07 40.0 E 7 INV • N 44 07 40.0 E 365.6600 .ENV CURVE RADIAL S 45 52 20.0 E DELTA 26 02 31.0 LT RAD 380. 0000 TAN 87.8764 L --ARC 172.7167 RADIAL S 71 54 51.0 E RP 8 CHORD N 31 06 24.5 E 171.2338 TANG'PT N 18 05 09.0 E 10 INV N 18 05 09.0 E 117.3000 INV CURVE RADIAL N 71 54 51.0 W DELTA 7 07 47.0 RT RAD 440.0000 TAN 27.4115 L -ARC 54.7523 RADIAL N 64 47 04.0 W RP 11 CHORD N 21 39 02.5 E 54.7170 TAN(PPT N 25 12 56.0 E 13 INV S 81 17 57.0 W 34.6100 INV CURVE RADIAL N 8 42 03.0 W DELTA 21 18 41.0 LT RAD 135. 0000 TAN 25.4004 L -ARC 50.2138 RADIAL N 30 00 44.0 W RP 14 CHORD S 70 38 36.5 W 49.9248 TAN@PT S 59 59 16.0 W 16 INV S 59 59 17.0 W 75.1200 TPA) rim.ur 1650.94549 1212.11450 1650.88171 161 0.05631 1988.99162 1724.41249 1986.87915 2251.45829 2133.49055 2244.99506 2108.40084 2295.85181 2290.6 1618 2157.16980 2274.06883 2236.49526 992.38769 2 Sn 1024.44017 1057.35423 1601.58512 1630.01090 1902. 77066 2157.~6541 1884.60565 2245.83081 2282.24559 2700.50629 2302. 43327 2288.64372 2221.11878 2156.07079 3 SA 4 5L c3 6 Tf 7 r 8 5-c 9 C'7 10 cg 11 Si 12 C 13 G� 2268.22157 14 (0L 15 (0 3 166,4- 17 LAS RADIAL.N 30 00 43.0 W DELTA 36 10 42 0 LT ' ) ' " RAD 135.0000 TAN 44.0966 L-ARC 85.2432 RADIAL N 66 11 25.0 W RP 2119.59591 2223.59516 18&6 17 CHORD S 41 53 56.0 W 8� 8341 �174 0?548 2100 08485 19 �Y� . . ^ ^ TAN@PT 8 23 48 35.0 W ` 19 INV S 23 4E W 25.0600 2151.16831 2089"96911 20&f . INV CURVE RADIAL S 66 11 25.0 E DELTA 31 54 52.0 RT RAD 455.0000 TAN 130.1016 L-ARC 253,4405 RADIAL S 34 16 33^0 E . RP • 2334.85206 1673"69263 21C7 20 CHORD 3 39 46 01,0 W 250"1768 1958.86922 1927^93842 22 TAN@PT S 55 43 27.0 W 22'INV S 55 43 26"0 W 104"7000 1899.90411 1843.42133 23 7( INV CURVE RADIAL S 34 16 34.0 E DELTA 22 45 05.0 RT RAD 305.0000 TAN 61.3642 L-ARC 121.1114 RADIAL S 11 31 29.0 E . RP 2151.93573 1671.65096 24 23 CHORD S 67 05 58.5 W 120.3173 1853.08496 1732.58713 25 z TAN@PT S 78 28 31.0 W 25 INV S 78 28 31.0 W 25.9200 1847"90638 1707.18971 26 INV CURVE RADIAL S 11 31 29 0 E . /{' DELTA 18 58 31.0 RT `� RAD 535"0000 TAN 89,4096 L-ARC 177^1819 RADIAL S 7 27 02.0 W � � � . RP 2372^12003 1600.30167 2775' 26 CHORD S 87 57 46.5 W 176.3733 1841.63696 1530.92792 '28,7‘ TAN@PT N 82 32 58.0 W 29 INV N 82 32 58"0 W 169.9300 1863.67188 1362.43262 29 77 INV CURVE RADIAL N 7 27 02.0 E DELTA 23 37 25.0 LT RAD 225"0000 TAN 47.0533 L-ARC 92^7697 RADIAL N 16 10 23.0 W RP '1640.57153 . 1333.25674 3018 29 CHORD S 85 38 19.5 W 92.1140 1856.66710 1270.58536 317, TAN@PT 8 73 49 37.0 W 31 INV S 73 49 37.0 W 54.0300 1841,61761 1218,69361 328 INV CURVE RADIAL S 16 10 23^0 E DELTA 3 21 12.0 RT RAD 1200.0000 � TAN 35"1261 L-ARC 70.2320 RADIAL S 12 49 11.0 E ^ RP 2994.12735 884.44623 33 8 32 CHORD S 75 30 13,0 W 70"2220 1824"0 1150^70721 34 Az TAN@PT S 77 10 • 0 W | 34 INV S 77 10 4`/ ^ 164.0100 ~ 0 W l64 0100 1787"64 990.78548 35 | � �� m r /,�� � �o � o �o � o � ��� �ruo �o 91� 6 '�� 7n4 99?'�B421 36 ' � LAT & DEF 0.00■ 0.00 36 HCLOSE N 24 25 ',.—.4 E 0.0084 1650.5 49 992.38769 PREC=1 TO 391783 271800.65ft 6.2397ac � �� � � `� � � � COORDINATES IN FEET ���~�'`��' u SCALE 200 1: 2400 ROTATION 90 NW COR 2375N 875E SE COR 875N 3700E POINT 33 OFF SCALE ~ 34 32 +12 cc: OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer October 25, 1991 V. Lennie Husa E. 11020 18th Spokane, WA. RE: Lot 2, Block 2, Valley Vista Estates Relocation of the drainage easement Dear Mr. Husa, Attached is a site plan which Mr. Hauser has submitted for his house constructed on Lot 2, Block 2, of Valley Vista Estates. Mr. Hauser's architect has plotted the center line and the easement limits of the proposed ditch as contained in your relocation design onto this site plan. As you can see, the center line of the ditch falls within the driveway for the house. Due to the location of the existing drainfield, the driveway cannot be moved further to the west to avoid the ditch. This is new information which was not supplied with your design. Because your plan does not show any conflict with the driveway, we assumed none existed. Now that we have been informed otherwise, we must withdraw our approval of your plan, and request that you submit a new plan which addresses these problem areas. With your new plan, please indicate all possible conflicts which may exist, such as slopes, utilities, driveways, buildings, or other physical features. Mr. Hauser also indicates that the existing 30 inch pipe (which your plan indicates to be removed) is laid on the same grade and alignment as the proposed new 24 inch pipe. If that is so, we do not see any need to replace a larger pipe with a smaller pipe. Please address this issue in your next submittal. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Gary S9 Nelson, P.E. Mr. Hauser Mr. Noll N. 811 Jefferson A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dennis M. Scott, I'.E., Director Spokane, WA 99260 -0180 (5091456 -3600 FAX (509) 456 -4715 \ \ \ EXi oaA �N \ - \c \ Rou1E PloX \ \ \ 3'0" '41 \w i2' �NV�R -RI V. '(yiif Lci`J VIA 102 '51101 0 E,L4V A IIARAGIE — X5.4 1 ,0t41.2 L- VEL- — grw. hNoP (7u6Fl..) -- io+ 3 104.M1 RECEUFD OCT 2 41991 'F p0..„ry E ; ;Mriu SfA 1004 $1,11 ' 09; vim. ?4. y Sx:s' t(RADE SITE , �.A r; SEA P RAIF1 E PL-A4 > 3o N u, 1;6oki1. Ff,,il7A Mr. Gary Nelson Spokane County Public Works Department North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 Dear Mr. Nelson, I have investigated the problems outlined in your letter and I have talked to Mr. Hauser, the property owner; Mr. Art Noll, representative of R. Guthrie Co the developer; and Mr. Gene Welborn, surveyor who worked on the project. RECEIVED NOV 0 51991 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER V. LENNIE HUSA P.E. E. 11020 18TH AVENUE SPOKANE, WA 99206 509- 924 -1298 November 4, 1991 I have received your letter dated October 25, 1991 concerning the drainage through Lot 2, Block 2 of Valley Vista Estates. It appears that a changed condition in relation to the location of the proposed driveway exists from what was originally at the site when the "Drainage Plan" drawing number VVE -1 was prepared. The driveway has been relocated further to the east because of installation requirements for a sanitary drain field. Also it appears that changes in land grading along and near the route of the drainage easement have been performed which affect the work as proposed on the "Drainage Plan" drawing. I am recommending to Mr. Hauser that additional field surveys be performed in the area to determine what actually exists there and that a revised "Drainage Plan" be prepared for this project. Please contact me if you have any further questions relative to this project. cc: Mr. Robert Hauser Mr. Art Noll Mr. Gene Welborn Sincerely, V. Lennie Husa P.E. Mr. Gary Nelson Spokane County Public Works Department North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 Dear Gary, 1 f1 V. LENNIE HUSA P.E. E 11020 18TH AVENUE SPOKANE, WA 99206 509- 924 -1298 December 20, 1991 I'm herewith submitting revised blue line prints of the Drainage Plan through Lot 2, Block 2 Valley Vista Estates for your review and approval. This is a follow up to your letter dated October 25. 1991 and our field review at the site on November 11, 1991. The drawings have been revised to reflect the existing condition and as agreed to during the field review. Please contact me if you have any further questions relative to this project. cc: Mr. Robert Hauser Mr. Art Noll Mr. Gene Welborn Enclosures: 2 prints Sincerely, V. Lennie Husa, P.E. =RIIICAL MAILRIAL USER: []YES SEWAGE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT ASA/500 DENSITY REDUIREMENT$ 0010 REQUIRED? []YES QrjNO (IVES $N0 DOE) APPROVAL & DATE SEG. DA1C: 100 SETBACK REQUIRED? EIYE.£ Po''' REQUIRED? [IVES . 1,1 D EASEMENT TES, L APPRO AL GNATUR DTNER AGENCY (I.E., 05HS, PLANNING, �7 /' '1 FLOW RATE .S W V MINIMUM SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS BY DISTRICT: (' : (SOIL LIVING RATE ,9> GAL /DAY DISPOSAL FACILITY: '4URAINEIELD SIZ : FLOW RATE GALS./FT x E • TRENCH TREATMENT FACILITY: '(7]SEPIIC TANK SIZE: /(Tt) O GALS. NO. / WIDTH] • 4447 LINEAL FT. LOADING RAPE [) GREASE TRAP SIZE: GALS. N0. (1 LEACHBED: FLOW RATE : SOIL GALS./FT a SO. O PUMP CHAMBER SIZE: GALS. N0. FT. PRESSURE DIS L BED [] SAND FILTER BED: FLOW RATE [] OTHER: : 1.2 GALS w FT (] ALTERNATIVE: (] (]'OTHER SEE ALTERNATIVE MOUND '(] (SPEC1tY): SYSTEM SPECS. FINAL INSP. ll -W ATTACHED ITN .H. 'ROGRAM APROVAL A 1 D TE; A•• T 0 APP'ZYA $IGN rr :is IL - .BLE PL .ING REO ESIE0 - It REQUIRED 0 RE,CATM 0 DATE: L7RJL• .w/A •VI D NG CO ' EASE A • L 6 — .. .: P ' 11 I S E ALE: 0 /a �/ y TI.L �' _._. N A SEE PKr; . ULID TO APPL. DATE �;G%� A ULID RCV'D DATE: I I ' 208 REQUIREMENTS NCV'0 ,_ N/A SEE PLOT PLAN lALL R: (P ONE NUMBER) // 1, STcvE. EXPIRE • IN ALS: I/ Ar- (INSTALLL�E�R Sj NATI-0 Ni ; ?5- '16121- FI, A. I SPE T ON / Nq�gE A // — .._. : IF . ,7/ •/ —P ,.. INYPECTION CALL -IN DATES FEE PAYMENTS: ANT. PAI1 !"JCP 1i%Qa11rint rl�.�PAij.ORIII P. ��Ii�' TEST HOLE INSP.717�A APPLICAT 'N PARTIAL INSP. / PERMIT twJ/ � ommon ammimm FINAL INSP. ll -W REINSPECTION REINSPEC FION RENEWAL 1 1 1 SIGN MAIL NOV- 15 -'91 10:04 ID:HEALTH SAO /O 1-v Z LGcL2 .c • ABAPOSED SYSTEM BY APPLICANT: ] SEP1IC TANK(S) NO. 1 [) OTHER PRETREATMENT FACILITY (SPECIFY) ,GRAINFIELD [I LEACHBED [I BUILDING SEWER (] OTHER DISPOSAL FACILITY (SPECIFY) WHAT 15 THE SOURCE OF WATER FOR THIS REMARKS AND APPROVAL CONDITIONS: ^Ietaa [2" of Q vivo JO-24 ' /1R-S pti1 1 e 9 - RESENTATIV (-4cla I' . 5714 Iti SA11..c Q KM-END-0532 (REVISED 3/88) SAT$ r .444.4 /AJ A95 R�L. R f4s -Y«.. A4 r 's. 6 S RR E � ON 0 EyCU / /J _poF TEL N0:94582243 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR ON SITE SEWAGE ' SYSTEM SCHEDULE OF APPROVALS AXONE: amailli _. rl ae rr�.Vlit.f� FOLLOWUP DATE: #218 P01 . $POK.t$E COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT APPLICATION N0. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION CENSUS TRACT WEST 1101 COLLEGE AVENUE DgTE OF APPLICATION SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99201 -209$ (509)456 040: 2 432 I/A((r( V'isiA E S LSE ADDRESS OR LEGA DU CA PTIOH OF PR TY: !/ CPPRO ERTY WITHIN: PSSA (DtlY /INSIDE ASA) ^�✓ &' ..? • C) GSSA (0UT /IN5IDE ASA) []'WWMA (OUTSIDE PSSA,ASA,GSSA) L G WN O R OF A P ADDRESS: PHONE• ' (] OUTSIDE ALL OF ABOVE �� sz t � � S: y25 7 ,- ' Erg (1 INSIDE ASA ONLY CLOP: I J I p °POSED USE OF PROPEL )i SINGLES T LFI Y nTbENCE - NUMBER OF BEDROOM TYPE OF STRUCTURE: [] MOBILE HOME RANC����(q [] SPLIT ENTRY O MULTI -LEVEL [1 MULTI - FAMILY COMPLEX: NQ. UNITS N0. BEDROOMS /UNIT f1 COMMERCIAL /IRE:DvRIAL (DESCRIBE): 4EMPLOYEES /DAY: #SEATS /CHAIRS FOR CLIENTS /CUSTOMERS: 15 THIS PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN A COMMUNITY PUBLIC SEWER SERVICE AREA? [] YES () NO IF YES NAME OF DISTRICT /SYSTEM: IS ULID AGREEMENT REQUIRED? 1. YES NO SEWAGE SYSTE COMPENIURI E REPLACEMENT /FAILURE: ()YES (.3I0 ALTERATION: OYES SIZE / 0 REASON: [] SATURATION /SOG () RELOCATE - CONFLICT [] OTHER [) CHANGE OF USE [) ADO -ON WILL THIS RESULT IN AN INCREASED SEWAGE FLOW? [DU ?T3Y10 ''1 PROPERTY: PUBLIC /SHARED WATER SYSTEM; NAME: PRIVATE: [1 WELL f1 SPRING f] LAX[ LATHER: PROPOSED PLO1 PLAN IS TO ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATION, ALONG WI1H ANY DINER PERTINENT INFORMATION, SUCH AS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY. . T HIS APPLICATION AND PERMIT APPROVAL 15 CONTINGENT UPON] MEETING REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN THE SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR ON -SITE SEWAGE SYSTEMS. APPROVAL IS BASED ON THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY THE APPLICANT. IF YOU ARE DISSATISFIED WITH THE DECISION OF THE HEALTH DISTRICT, YOU MAY APPEAL TO THE HEALTH OFFICER WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS OF DENIAL OF THIS APPLICATION (SEE APPEAL PROCEDURE). CONTA T • •SON PH�O �ErS'): -yec7 DATE: j5 7 aGeA,, f -uv p✓Pc . ik, ee,✓.Ih A(.4 Pu>» i Yacj All td, J /ems 1 NOV-15-'91 10:05 I D: HEALTH SPO.- " " °.. ' 'TELL'" N0: 94582243 tP IS/ ob 0. � N 1 a ..Q e4 Z i `1 1D -9 40 be- C 1 lv/3 L D 2 h1 a • (0 71 -Q c, e.r kf•,re M\-1 /vo - (p (94'0 5T \(,c b tS 12 6 — ^ _ —I g v a tCo 'j .v 46 #218 P02 Mr. Gary Nelson Spokane County Public Works Department North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane. WA 99260 -0170 Dear Gary. V. Lennie Husa P. E. Consulting Engineer E. 11020 18th Avenue Spokane, WA 99206 509 - 924 -1298 May 15, 1991 I'm submitting herewith 1 check print and 1 mylar reproducible drawing of the drainage revision through lot 2. block 2, of the Valley Vista Estates for your office final review and approval. I have revised the previous drawings submitted to you on April 25, 1991 as listed in your review comments and as discussed with you and with Bob Turner on the telephone May 13. 1991. Bob Turner agreed to the following revisions to the April 25. 1991 submittal: 1. Change the seeding rate to 20 lbs. /Acre 2. Change the rate of fertilizer to provide 40 lbs /Acre of nitrogen. By changing the application rate of 16 — 20 fertilizer to 250 lbs /acre. this is accomplished. 3. Specifying a tack coat. 4. Clarify the need for hand tilling of the seedbed. Sincerely. Enclosures: 1 mylar reproducible 1 check print 1 check print w /previous review comments V. Lennie Husa P.E. Mr. Gary Nelson Spokane County Public Works Department North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 992160 -0170 Dear Gary. Enclosures: 2 prints 4 catalog cuts V. LENNIE HUSA P.E. E 11020 18TH AVENUE SPOKANE. WA 99206 509- 924 -1298 January 7. 1992 I'm herewith submitting revised blue line prints of the Drainage plan through Lot 2, Block 2 Valley Vista estates for your review and approval. These drawings have been revised from the previous submittal as suggested by your review comments dated January 3. 1992. Please contact me if you have any further questions relative to this project. Sincerely. V. Lennie Husa P.E. INLAND OUNDRY CO. INC . IFCO NO. 826 thru 830 continued Ring: 828 (5" x 24 ") Height: 5" Outside Diameter: 34" Clear Opening: 24" Weight: 180 lbs. Ring: 827 (6" x 24 ") Height: 6" Outside Diameter: 36" Clear Opening: 24" Weight: 255 lbs. approx. Ring Height: 5" Outside Diameter: 281." Clear Opening: 22 Weight: 90 lbs. Cover Diameter: 2316" Thickness: %" Convexity: 1 /2" Weight: 65 lbs. Ring: 829 (4" x 24 ") Height: 4" Outside Diameter: 32" Clear Opening: 24" Weight: 165 lbs. Ring: 830 (3" x 24 ") Height: 3" Outside Diameter: 291/2" Clear Opening: 23 Weight: 130 lbs. IFCO No. 826 Ring and Slotted Cover meets Spokane, Washington Standard Plan B -116 ; Specifications for Manhole Ring and Slotted Cover. Covers A, B, and Slotted covers are interchangeable with any IFCO No. 826 thru 830 manhole ring. Suitable for heavy traffic loading. Specify lettering required. Machine seat ring and cover. Specify IFCO number, cover style, and /or slotted cover when ordering. Meets Spokane, Washington Standard Plan B -118 Specifications for Catch Basin Sidewalk Ring and Cover. Not suitable for traffic loading. Specify lettering required. Machine seat ring and cover. Specify IFCO number when ordering. 21 253 SEC M A -• 27 _34 SECTOJ A -A SECTION A - A It 25 12' 2312' 2912' SECTION A-A 4 IFCO NO. 831 • a -e Wl]3 A e -9 `4S 5 T T PiI 11.2.1 I , i sz —� ram:: unaes 310.4 rad • -. N9035 0£8 `638 `838 `L39 `938 'ON OOAI abed lxau panu!luoo 6E8 fJ419Z8'ON 0_ Jano0 pue 6wa aloqueyj ice suoneoilpa= ZZl 8 ueld piepuels uol6uiysem'auev_c: slaaw y Jen00 9?9 ON pue bulb 9Z8 ON Or- s41 LCL :146!apy, „L :ssauNoiy :6uwad0 lolc „q,gZ :suo!suaw!Q apisln0 13A03 pauoc xojdde •ql 09L :34 „PAL :ssau5loly „VLSI :ialawe!O 9yam* 'sql 9L l :14 q, L :ssainloi4 i 7SZ jalawe!O t/ uawcV sql SSZ :14 „qZ :6uluado JealO .,9E :Jelawe!Q ep!sln0 „L :146!ay („ bZ X „L) 9Z9 :Bulk a311o1s `9 ` V :s1i3A00 •6uuapJo uayM Jagwnu 00d1 Ajpao "J8A00 pue 6uu leas au!y •pajlnbai 6uuallal A1!3 •6u!peol ol}leJl dneey Jo; algepn •Jano0 pue 6um aloqueyy X01 suo!leo!;!oadc It'. 'ON ueld piepuels uol6u!yseM'ailleas slate, sql 09l :146!eM , :ssauNol4 i „•9Z :ialawe!G sql 90Z :346iaN, „q3 :6u!uad0 Jeal0 „y£ :Jalawelp °p eww° „9 :346ia1; Sue. 938 'ON 03AI • )NI OD AMMO GNV IN) CC)NCuLTN•I'UPAIC:L•RUIL[)INU PRODUCTS CCU (509) 5340651 EAST 6219 TRENT PRE CAST MANHOLE SECTLON ASTM 478 Tongue & Groove - 4" Wall Mortar Joint Or •Ail Weather.Mastic Type Joint See Page 8 For Riser Rings See Page 16 For Other Type Cones Available With or Without Steps See Page 19 For . Reinforced Street Lid 3 Tall 2' Tall 1' Tall ith Or Without Steps pecial Holes Upon Request PAGE 15 WHITE BLOCK IOINI CUNCRI 1 L •I'IIfvII( I. dun I.UIN(; I'RC)1)(JC1 S Al CIO (509) 534:0651 LAST 6219 TRENT S POKANE ` WA 99212 -1280 REIN FORCED STREET LIDS (For Use With Shallow Manhole Where Cone Is Not Practical) Street Lid For 5" Wall Manhole Sections - See Pages 17 & 18 4 Street Lid For 4" Wall Reverse Tongue & Groove Manhole & Perf. Barrel Sections See Pages .8, 9, 10, 11 & 12 Street Lid For 4" Wall Tongue Groove Manhol Sections On 15 Mr. Gary Nelson Spokane County Public Works Department North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Wa. 99260 -0170 Dear Gary. V. Lennie Husa P.E. Consulting Engineer E. 11020 18th Avenue 509- 924 -1298 March 25. 1991 I'm submitting herewith 2 check prints and some computations on the drainage revision through lot 2, block 2 of the Valley Vista Estates for your office review and approval. I have revised some grades and right -of -way widths from the previous submittal to you on this project on October 30. 1990. Enclosures: 2 copies check prints 1 set of computations copy of previous submittal Sincerely, V. Lennie Husa P.E. RECEIVE MAR 2 6 1991 PAY kieeerieg V. LENNIE NUSA,P.E ,.. - ..CONSULTING ENGINEER E. 11020 18TH AVE. SPOKANE, WA 99206 4 ec_4 h -C /o . /r of rte/ eJ -4 c C /ter q a a e / 76 c-ci / -P f- ce / ii' S 7`k 97 -e (#L33o Spa /O / 3r l o ( 99 r - 7 4 o /o 3 8 c-C o o q o. 2- z, O // roc / ror/ / //� C_l0G//l e/ Y a/- (e :T . I/r- /Q sfo s- Z-07 Z -Z?/c -1C Z D / = 0,263 t ?%le //3 Kix-gs /- 4/elka oL.7 � /r CJ 3 ci �c /i i6 /fir_. D = 0,2.6.3 (a) (oJ, G o' _ C 2 9 7 3 , - 2 0 , 1 / / 7 , - se 34 c 2 63 C9 0.4 06 rt. b - d z . C z ) @ /Foci I L L c (46&) , a 5 � - f: 0'. 0 l:.. 3/z 2/9- / r/flrO7 // CoGfirei ,zur reg �.3 1 it >o / - aJ LEfSiE HUSH, P.E. :CONSULTING EF;GhEER E. 11020 18TH AVE. - SPONArE. C:.7 C22c5 Yaffe -(-_l/ <s /a ___, 77 a/loci 1 e lm 0 -74 ? i -z- -f- 3/ 7 // 7 r 33f Q g c s = 0, 663 Z, " rock f /p / /ireJ cha e c 4 O ff ` / - - (6 3 j (o,zss) 0, / /3 Ko >lc; m 3rd b .z - ( (6, 1 78j ,tf /, S8 Eric /, S8 4 w. /roc% / - i p s o o . / /Hec ‘ / DITCH CALCULATIONS 8= .065 ft/ft Sc= 3^35353676068E-2 ft/ft V= 5.03806559785 fps Vc= 4.01406733991 fps D= "559323466527 f t Dc= .664913258779 ft Q= 8 cf L= 100 ft n = .04 "ft= ,330814g007 min TRAPEZDTDALCHANNEL B= 2 ft Lt SS= 1.5 :1 Rt SS= 1.5 :1 DITCH CALCULATIONS S= .2 ft/ft Sc= 3.35353676068E-2 ft/ft V= 7"487805791 fps Vc= 4.014()6733891 fps b= ,408839553738 ft Dc= "664913258779 ft Q= 8 cfs L= 100 ft n = .04 Tt= .222584120527 min TRAPEZOIDALCHANNEL B= 2 ft Lt SS= 1.5 :1 Rt SS= 1.5 :1 PROJECT: VOVier Y /S1/ - :2 DESIGNER: 1/, Z(r7/7 /C- l76, D`Gl /G/ oICC(055 Lo{ Z , 3 /ccyc- DATE: /eV/ C/f6 HYDROLOGIC AND CHANNEL INFORMATION • CC—S- 0 2 Q �, D C F—S T W , - SKETCH STATIONI 00 /-3 S : (9. C C70 EL L- /04 n = (5- OZ¢ # AHW 1 -- - "�- TW (. DESIGN DISCHARGE, SAY 0 OR 9 50) EL. EL. 9 CULVERT DESCRIPTION (ENTRANCE TYPE) K e` 0 SIZE HEADWATER COMPUTATION I dyooleA moo COMMENTS OPEN FLOW s PRESSURE FLOW c l d V c d n V n Inlet- Outlet Control V 2 q 2 HW d e dot) TW h LSo 3 HW 2 " Z % 4 c / Xcg o = 1 F z ¢ la s o o, 70 g.( Cas / 0 .37 1.7g --- -- AY /A ---,- 8x I8 C NI /' fezoi3 ao /8 /•l SS au' N le �i/n/as2,zA9 IVA '' 9,,5- . r SUMMARY 6 RECOMMENDATIONS: / LL a �" c /V, - %/f 2> /e 4 /7 /We 9re ri {�/ S �4C�/l c -A (c t-) - / scl e «f %puce_ �� *-�` -t- G ems-- %vloc /co2c /..°; 0ccLir, �/�� /S .� /Zc C /G/C / Ice i L- %G f - e_ 4es �////6/9fr ./or77J /-e c c 7 -7: /7/ P dectr rc ,'- 0 " J' e 7 -, i � ' c // °f- Gc.--7 glee 2 / fr- c • cn 1. AHW = ALLOWABLE HEADWATER 2D OR LESS FOR D 'SIB" 1.5D OR LESS FOR 0 -I8 2. MW= d .= (1•Ke) 2g 3. MW= H.ho -LS0 (Use Figure to. obtain ° H ° ,) d = Inlet Control, use dc, V dn�d Outlet Control, use d ' . ZZ 3231101d u it1 a -I. -1 L.dS F LS. rt � T� , yi SPOnAnc COUNTY COURT »oust AGREEMENT T O Agreement Number P This agreement between Spokane County and whose interest in the project is Oemer /seller this day of November applicable to the project known as: Plat amendment for Valley Vista Estates ( Lot That the individuals and parties named herein as having an interest in the above described property or project agree to the following: 1. Reimburse Spokane County for project review and inspection fees as specified in Board of County Commissioner's Resolution 80 -1592 attachment C, as amended. The fees will be based on actual salary costs incurred by Spokane County for project reviews and / or inspections plus a ten percent administrative charge, and wil'1 be billed monthly as accrued. 2. The undersigned agrees that these fees are due and payable upon receipt of the billing as specified above. The monthly billing should be sent to the attention of: Ralph Guthrie R. 13h23 32nd. Ave. Spokane, Washington 99216 (509) 926 -1561 I understand that failure to pay these fees may result in delay in completion or approval of the project or other possible sanctions. Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / t , J Y i V T rte. •r it i PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 -0170 PAY FEE S Ralph Guthrie , is entered into 19 90m . This agreement is 2, Block 2 ) By F Ralph D. Guthrie Spokane, Washington 99260 -0170 (509) 456 -3600 •`^: `.....uaau:a ,,„,,,„„„.3iN,,,.,,N h .]aF144...s, F}NMI -,......1.Yl..• 1•,,,,,l.l.) R. GUTHRIE CO. 18694 E. 1 3423 32ND AVE. SPOKANE-WA, 99216 ' • - 'Spokane County Engineers $; 100.00 F w r "f i 4 ... 1, L/ 1 1 1.._ 1 .... !:::: -1=1 ; .'ll q 11 ) ( 7. RY Y Qp 1 SI'� 1 :: BANK BOOK ANQ MAIN RANCH W, 4Q111 PIVERBIOE AVENUE. P.O. BOX TAR-01a OPOKANE. WABKINBTON SINEW U.B. SANK OF WASHINGTON. NATIONALABBOCIATION FOR RE • Pondorsa •- d,rai X 11 0 186949', I:125000 i051: 1001 .November 6, 79 90 19_10 1250 DOLLARS 79 759 �. Mr. Gary Nelson Spokane County Public Works Department North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane. Wa 99260 -0170 Dear Gary. I'm submitting herewith 2 check prints and some computations on the drainage revision through lot 2. block 2 of the Valley Vista Estates for your office review and approval. I have redesigned the system from the submittal provided to you on October 24. to include more open channel and less CMP through the project segment. This change was requested by Art Nolls. Enclosures: 2 copies check prints 1 set of computations V. Lennie Husa P. E. Consulting Engineer E 11020 18th Avenue Spokane, WA 99206 509 - 924 -1298 October 30, 1990 V. Lennie Husa P.E. Mr. Gary Nelson Spokane County Public Works Department North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane. Wa 99260 -0170 Dear Gary. Thank you. Enclosures: 2 sets of check prints 1 set of computations V. Lennie Husa P. E. Consulting Engineer E. 11020 18th Avenue Spokane. WA 99206 October 24, 1990 I'm submitting herewith 2 check prints and some computations on the drainage revision through lot 2. block 2 of the Valley Vista Estates for your office review and approval. Sincerely. V. Lennie Husa P. E. Project : Valley Vista Estate County ; Spokane Subtitle: Basin "D" Flow Type 2 year Length Slope Surface n Area Wp Velocity lime rain (ft) (ft/ft) code (so/ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) Sheet 1.4 Shallow Concent'd Shallow Crncent`d Open Channel Open Channel TR-55 Tc and Ti THRU SUBAREA COMPUTATInN 300 400 300 400 F State: WA . • 12 * - Generated for use by GRAPHIF method � User: vlh Checked: ___ VERSION 1.11 Date 09-11-90 Date: O.519 0.022 0^S!5 0.020 7.0 0^020 Time of Concentration =40r664 --- Sheet Flow surface Codes --- A Smooth Surface F Grass. Dense --- Shallow Concentrated --- B Fallow (No Res.) G Grass, 8urmuda --- Surface Codes --- C Cultivated < 20 % Res, H Woods, Liqht P Paved D Cultivated > 20 % Res. I Woods, Dense U Unpaved E Grass-Ranoe, Short Project : Valley Vista Estate County : Spokane State: @A Subtitle: Basin "D" TR-55 GRAPHICAL DISCHARGE METHOD VERSION 1.11 User: vlb flat:, 09-11-90 rhecked: Date: ___________ Data: Drainage Area : 24"3 Acres +/ /� ,� ^/ / Runoff Curve Number : '73 � L.4_2/7 '/nY/� �� L���/e`�OP��pn- Time of Concentration: 0.60 Hours Rainfall Type : II Pond and Swamp Area : NONE | Storm Number | 1 1 2 | 3 | Frequency (yrs) | 2 | 10 | 5(} | | | | 24-Hr Rainfall (in) | 1.4 2'.0 | 2.4 1 Ia/P Ratio | 0"53 1 0.37 0.31 | | | | Used | 0"50 | 0.37 | 0.31 | Runoff (in) | 0.10 | 0.32 | 0.: | Unit Peak Discharge 10,325 10,529 0.6()9 (cfs/acre/in) | Pond and Swamp Factor 1.00 | 1.00 | 1,00 | (}.o% Ponds Used | | | | | Peak Discharge (cfs) | 1 | r1-J;P ; t.51r--e7‘-e- 3/7 ! • v. LENNIE MUSA, P.E.. • —1 • L____.j CONSULTING ENGIUER_ / 4 / : .fr _thfith 6 ' ! ! • , ! • - E. 11020 10TH AVE akr/7 0 SPONAEE,.17.1SD205 - 2- I /4 C6 //7 oyaS I 5 a i/(( I 2- 5--'p /° co Pr 1 /- 5 e n 93 es cot- Ce/ err IC° ' ig77 e . d g e(o fr at- ea - - 7I F S/PG / , e 5S co?Af e 7 co e a7' /i5e ( 5 - z ae Zciel ?" 771/4 re ,e; /of x‘foic--F e cic_s _T--0/— 2. 4 W LEtiNIE HUSA - 17 / 79-- 77- -- 4-s" CONSULTING ENGMEER __a(t-clio fr Cazriva 2/../c;r770 ' 11020 18TH AVE. LJ _ - SPOMME, WA 99205 Pe.l&E" fri./no - -4 - 0/ - cirreva 73/c - /le r Ei5 e c;ctiner e /o 5c‘ 1-7ceitasr-- Ch a n9 c- "rOc -ior itc4 to e citzP/ c %eive7..so 7"4 e %! Geri (7 e- . 7. tic bc-cr Al 4' /-1Oeir 4 „dcf%erj /4& 7L t 7/729e- Z-z'/ - r 777. fl . G7 Go e. 6 7 e Ife" 4/S _ er Le' k 71/ Ge C 0 f- _ _ il /if 83 L"-- e‘e . - ta e c(6=elop Ace , = , 4e7 P-- _Led . cc( . -EDJ he's //7/771 %if 122 4/.6 4 jja9/eecL W/"7 -he rc -6C r 74-r 5/.c df c1(4-g - 7zi• A cad dr4-q/Hy TO"- 4cie<c- 7 -4 ceco‘e. arect s fellocp,s: 777- . a*ce ircit(A9s0,c11 7L- . .2, . ant' - - Cif . 4 c o- os. 4 r ) L \ 1\ ° SG (IS _ c -7— e34 6 00 / ci •=7 0 ef—Fri Pc - 7cd -4,t0P ve4e 1(“1/ 4:7 77e. i , Sec_ °/-1 e n( See - o 6 o /76-(-5 PROJECT: VV,077-e YiC , � S eoric 3 DESIGNER: V 4c/7 /774 ,4SQ' P 7 a Ce( - /07 2, .79 /GC,C DATE : /G V/ G HYDROLOGIC AND CHANNEL INFORMATION• O ° �i TWt = SKETCH !� STATION1 /D /T„ S : c0. 0 7o EL. L . / Op ?` AHW 2 ----"--- (Q : DESIGN DISCHARGE, SAY Q OR q ) �TW EL. EL. CULVERT DESCRIPTION ( ENTRANCE TYPE) 0 SIZE HEADWATER COMPUTATION Outlet Veloclty COMMENTS , OPEN FLOW PRESSURE FLOW d V d V n Inlet - Outlet Control 2 q 2 HW d e dc. T W ho L50 3 HW 2 2.q- Cl('(P Ke = x. ,56' �,0 Z� 1, o .�G O,�O S. r��lf/i/ /G//af e39 �:.5�d 4 '/ „/,� �/f+- 7 - ( /G1 t*Zy6o(e SUMMARY a RECOMMENDATIONS: Gge, z q-” C A/1" So&e e ®s -L2 yMt e 7 et', - e » in 1. AHW : ALLOWABLE HEADWATER 2D OR LESS FOR D •18 1.50 OR LESS FOR D 2. HW = d 4 . (1 • Ke 2q 3.HW :H 4ba - LSo (Use Figure to, obtaln. ° H ° ,) d �d = Inlet Control, use de, Ve. (I Outlet Control, use dn ,Vn. ZZ 38115U AMXCO YRKIMR TEL No.5095750439 dab American Excelsior Company AN EMPUT'EE UWN[p COM!'AN TO: 5FtgAAh C,n . FACSIMILE COVER PAGE TELEFAX: / `IT& FROM: rut nJ ( ta NUMBER OF PAGES (Including this page): +0+ two-tro-ci ire Apr 30,91 12:29 No.003 P.01112 OUR FAX NUMBER IS: 509 - 575 -0439 is 609 SOUTH FRONT ST., YAKIMA, WA 989013286, (509) 575.5794 FAX (509) 575 -0439 rn v a, Li I n N nep,lnted by special perm+sa Irani the May 1987 issue Of Rural and urban enan .. CnpyriQhlee c 1ne Reuben M. flonncllcy Corporation, 196.5 T IIE Nebraska Department of Roads is constantly faced with the problem of establishing and maintaining vegetative cover along roadsides throughout the state. Prairie grass hay is most commonly used for mulching pur- poses. Anchorage is effectively and economically accomplished by means of a tractor -drawn mulch packer. Conventional tractor -drawn equipment, how - - ever, cannot be operated safely on slopes steeper than 4:1. Slopes steeper than 4:1 pose special problems in the establish- ment of vegetation. Mulches, other than prairie hay and grain straw, and methods of application should be evaluated in the State on steep slopes for ease of applica- tion, feasibility, erosion control, soil moisture retention, and for their effect on soil temperature during the critical periods of ger- mination and establishment. In 1965 a cooperative study was initiated between the De- partment of Agricultural Engi- 1fl'ublished with the approval of the Director as Paper No, 2097, Journal Series, Nebraska Agrirultural Experi- ment Station, Lincoln. Originally presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the High- way Research Board. 2 /Assistant Professor of Horticulture and Forestry, University of Nebraska, and Research Agricultural Engineer and Agricultural Engineer, USDA respectively. ILL IJO -D U'J'DiDu4c i Latex Fiberglass Asphalt No mulch Mulch t rea Lm e n t5a Wood cellulose Fiberglass and asphalt Wood cellulose and asphalt Woodchips and asphalt Corncobs and asphalt Prairie hay and asphalt Prairie hay and light paper netting Medium paper netting Excelsior mat Jute netting Hpr _,u,y1 12 N:.UU V.U REPRINTED FROM RURAL & URBAN ROADS ti A. E. Dudack, N. P. Swanson, and A. R. Dedrick Table 1. Mulch treatments, description and rates of application. Description and method of application An emulsifiable material diluted 1:6 with water and sprayed on the plot Continuous filaments of fiberglass applied with compressed air Wood cellulose fiber applied hydraulically as a water slurry An emulsifiable asphalt diluted 1:1 with water and sprinkled on plot Fiberglass anchored with 1:5 asphalt emulsion Prairie hay anchored with tightly twisted kraft paper netting with a 2 by 0.5 yarn count Tightly twisted. random colored kraft netting with a 7 by 4 yarn count High grade wood excelsior covered with Large mesh, kraft paper netting Heavy woven jute net will) a 1.0 by 1.1 yarn count 10 vhf (Ake C Mulch Performance On Neu-) Neu-) � J �A-'6 u f� ) s Steep Construction Slopes' ; , Hate per acre 1050 gal 1000 Ibs 1000 Ibs in 9000 gal 2400 gal 1000 Ibs and 900 gal • Wood cellulose fiber anchored with 1:5 asphalt 1000 Ibs and emulsion 900 gal Pine woodchips from a portable chipper an- 6 Lon s and chored with 1:5 asphalt emulsion 900 gal Ground corncobs slightly larger than 1/4 inch 5 tons and anchored with 1:5 asphalt emulsion 900 gal Prairie hay anchored with 1:5 asphalt emulsion 1 ton and 900 1 ton • The latex is manufactured by the Velsicol Chemical Corp. The fiberglass is mono• factored by the Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. The wood cellulose was manufactured by the International Paper Co. Tito asphalt 11,511 is manufactured by the American Bitumuls and Asphalt Co. The paper ncttings and jute net are manufactured by the Bemis Bro. flag Co. 7'he excelsior mat is manufactured by American Excelsior Corp. The. average composition of the prairie hay was 74 percent bluestem, 23 percent switch - grass, and miscellaneous grasses and weeds. I I1 �. 11'lll APPLICATIONS: stSlbpe (tal itkli)fI0. al le itChe"sleir Grass Lined Waterways High Altitude Revegetation High Wind Areas Ski Slopes Other Problem Areas LIMITATIONS: ILL I VU.LV_D(JV4J7 HI-VELOCITY CURLEX BLANKET Hpr . 12:2'J NO1.000 V.12 /12 SPECIFICATION: The Hi- Velocity Curlex Blanket is a machine produced mat of curled and barbed Aspen wood fibers, 80% of which are 6 inch or longer. Fiber is evenly distributed throughout the blanket and is of consistent thickness. Both sides of the Hi- Velocity Blanket are covered by a heavy duty black mesh which contains a U.V. inhibitor for added longevity. The blanket is smolder resistant without the addition of chemicals. HI- Velocity Curlex is normally recommended in areas experiencingrfiow.siup to a arraaxim m of+l`24ss For areas of greater flow rates, refer to ground Anchor System or Composites Section or consult American Excelsior's Specialist. HI- VELOCITY ROLL SIZE Width 48 in. ( + /-- 1 in.) Length 100 ft. min. Area Coverage .. 400 sq. ft. .. (44 + sq. yds.) Weight 72 lbs. ( +/— 7 lbs.) 5 neering and the Department of Horticulture and Forestry at the University of Nebraska. The pur- pose of this study was to evalu- ate a number of mulching mate- rials relative to their effects on erosion control and grass esta- blishment on a variety of dif- ferent soil types, slope gradients, and cut and fill sections. Swansen et. al. (5) percents the results of the first study on a 3:1 roadside cut section relative to erosion control under simulated rain- storms. The objective was to evaluate the same selected mulches on the same regraded slope and soil type in terms of their effects on soil temperature, soil moisture and seedling grass cover during the critical period of germination and establishment. Materials and Methods On September 3, 1965, thirteen mulch treatments were applied to plots along State Spur 841 ap- proximately two miles south of Firth, Nebraska. Plots 10 ft. wide by 20 ft. long were replicated twice in a randomized block de- sign on a west - facing 3 ;1 back - slope. A check plot receiving no mulch was included in each re- plication. The soil on the experimental site is classified as a Wymore silty clay loam and tested pH 6.7, very low (5 ppm) in phosporns and high (215 ppm) in potassium. There- fore, a 15-48 -0 fertilizer at the rate of 415 pounds per acre was ap- plied to the surface but was not worked In. All plots were seeded with Lincoln bromegrass. Bromus inermis Leyss., at the rate of 120 pure live seeds per square ft. with a cyclone -type seeder. The mulch treatments at the rates listed in Table 1 were then applied. Data were gathered on soil temperatures, soil moisture, seed- ling stand, seedling height, and percent cover as affected by each mulch treatment. Summary Plots protected with excelsior mat; prairie hay anchored with a loose paper netting; or a combina- tion of emulsifiable asphalt as an anchorage for woodchips, chopped corncobs, prairie hay, or wood Ii.- III• JJ'I -tJJ i Treatments Excelsior mat 58.3 a Prairie hay and 67.5 a Tight paper netting Fiberglass and 57.5 a asphalt Prairie hay and 57.0 ab asphalt Corncobs and 57.0 ab asphalt Jute netting 56.6 ab Asphalt 68.2 bc Woodchips and 56.2 be aahpalt Latex 66.2 be Wood cellulose 56.2 be and asphalt Medium paper 55.8 be netting Fiberglass 567 be No mulch 65.2 c Wood cellulose 55.0 c Treatments ... EssiEL Prairie hay and light paper netting Woodchips and asphalt Corncobs and asphalt Jute netting Prairie hay and asphalt Wood cellulose and asphalt Medium paper netting Fiberglass and asphalt Fiberglass No mulch Latex Asphalt Wood cellulose Minimum n .JV • J1 1:_LJ IV!i VV.) r . VJ 1 Z Table 2. Effect of various mulch treatments on soli temperature one-hall Inch below surface on clear and cloudy days.. 9 /11 Clear 9/13 Cloudy Maximum Range Maximum 82.0 a 23.7 a 71.8 ab 85.0 b 27.5 b 71.8 ab 93.2 1 35.7 def 74.8 d 86.8 bc 30.6 be 72.3 ab 88.5 ed 92.0 cd 71.8 ab 89.3 ed 32.6 cde 71 -2 a 301.6 g 45.9 g 76.5 e 89.6 de 33.4 •def 73.2 be 90.2 de 34.0 cdef 71.7 ab 93.3 1 37.2 f 74.2 cd 89.3 cd 93.4 •def 72.5 be 91.7 ef 36.0 ef 72.7 bc 91.0 der 36.7 def 72.0 ab 90.3 de 35.4 def 72.2 ab a Any two means with different letters are significantly different at the five percent level. Table 4. Percent grass 'cover eight and fourteen months after seeding.' 93.6 a 78.2 ab 73.5 b 72.5 b 71.7 b 71.5 b 52.5 e 61.7 60.8 c 48.3 c 38.3 cd 36.8 cd 35.8 cd 29.2 d Percent cover May 24, 1966 Percent cover November 90, 1966 89.2 a 75.8 ab 69.2 b 71.7 b 70.0 b 74.2 ab 53.3 c 47.5 c 45.8 e 46.7 c 38.3 cd 47.5 c 30.0 d 43.9 ed • Any two means with different letters are significantly different at the' five percent level. Table 3. Effect of various mulch treatments on soli moisture In the top one - half Inch of soil, seedling elands, seedling heights, and percent cover at various Inlervale after seeding.' Soil moisture a6 @ 6 days Wood cellulose 19.6 d ''Any two means with different level. cellulose had significantly more grass cover than did the no-mulch treatment one month after seeding. Although differences in soil moisture percentages and soil T EMPORARY stabilization of disturbed soil surface until vegetation can become established is a continuing problem for high- way departments. The advantages of holding the grass seed and soil in place until adequate cover has been established are apparent. In many instances, erosion may cause greater maintenance costs on a construction slope than the initial cost of smoothing, mulching, and seeding. Research on mulching materials used to prevent water erosion on a 6 percent slope has been conduct. ed, using simulated rainfall, since 1962 at Lincoln, Nebraska. During Seedlings per sq ft (¢ 26 days Excelsior mat 28.0 a 104.1 a Prairie hay 25.0 ab 71.1 ab and asphalt Prairie hay 24.9 abc 81.2 eh and light netting Asphalt 24.9 abc 18.8 c Woodchips and 22.6 bcd 89.4 ab asphalt Jute Netting 22.8 hcd 82.2 ab Corncobs and 226 bed ' 91.9 ab asphalt Medium paper 21.6 bcd 67.8 ab netting Latex 21.4 bcd 59.6 b Fiberglass 20.8 hcd 78.6 ab Wood cellulose 20,8 bcd 72.6 ab and asphalt Fiberglass and 20.5 bcd 68.0 ab asphalt No mulch 20.4 cd 57.6 h 75.6 ab 1 2 3 4 11.1 a 9.6 ab 9.4 be 5.1 f 8.6 be 7.2 de 8.0 cd 6.2 of 5.5 5.4 7.2 Seedlings heights (cm) a 28 days tf 1 de 7.2 de Percent cover 0 28 days 66.7 a 59.2 a 64.2 a 5.2 e 66.7 a 36.7 be 66.7 a 27.6 bed 14.3 de 22.5 cde 46.8 ab 26.8 bcde ef 18.3 ede 6.3 ef 18.3 ede letters are significantly different at the five percent temperatures between mulch treatments were statistically significant, these factors apparent- ly had no great practical effects on seedling grass stands with one ex. Protecting Steep Slopes Against Erosion the summer of 1965. a rotating boom rainfall simulator was used to evaluate the effectiveness of 13 selected mulches for controlling the losses of soil, seed and fert- ilizers on a 3:1 roadside backslope. Materials and Methods This study was conducted on a Wymore silty clay loam at a site Storm Duration (hr) Table to J. 1L' L L. 1'1V . ception. The poor stand of grans on the plots mulched with emulsi liable asphalt may have been due to high soil temperatures and the wide range between soil temperature extremes. The rate of 7200 gallons per acre also may have been excessive for good ger- mination. Differences between mulches probably would have been greater under conditions of normal, or preferably below normal, precipitation. The most effective mulches one year after seeding were found to be excelsior mat, prairie hay anchored with a light paper netting, and prairie hay anchored with emulsifiable asphalt. After eight months, the plots treated with excelsior mat averaged 99.5 percent cover but were not significantly different from the plots treated with prairie hay and light paper netting which averaged 782 percent. In addition to these, plots treated with jute netting, and asphalt anchored mulches of woodchips, corncobs, and .prairie hay all had significantly more grass cover than did the no-mulch plots which averaged 382 percent. Essentially the same relation was true after fourteen months except the excelsior mat and prai- rie hay and Tight paper netting mulches were not significantly dif- ferent In grass cover as compared to the prairie hay and asphalt anchored plots. located about 3 miles - south : -of Firth, Nebraska, along State Spur 341. A roadside cut was shaped to approximately a 9:1 slope. The sur• face was quite moist at the time of shaping and hardened upon drying. A mechanical analysis of a composite sample from the cut soil surface analyzed 9 percent sand, Intensity (in/hr) 1.4 2.5 1.0 2.5 0.9 5.0 0.8 2.5 plus introduced surface flow 59 percent silt, and 32 percent clay. Twenty -six plots, each 10 x 20 feet, provided test plots for 2 rep- licates of 13 mulch treatments. These treatments, along with rates and methods of application, are presented in Table 1. After appli- cation of the mulch, each plot was covered with plastic for pro- tection against natural rainfall until simulated rainstorms could be applied. Four storms were applied to pairs of test plots as follows: Grass seed and fertilizer were applied prior to mulching. Smooth bromegrass (Bromus inert/Us Leyss.) seed was applied at a rate of 120 seeds per square foot. The seed was autoclaved to prevent germination on the plots or after collection in the runoff samples. Phosphorus was applied to each plot at the rate of 83 pounds per acre in the form of treble super- phosphate. Summary The protection afforded against water erosion by each mulch was evaluated by measuring (a) soil, (b) grass seed, and (c) phospho- rus losses. The best protection was given by materials such as jute notting, wood excelsior, and prai- rie hay (1 ton per acre) or fiber- glass (1000 pounds per acre) an- chored with asphalt emulsion (150 gallons per acre). The least effec- tive mulches were latex (160 gallons per acre) and kraft paper netting. The most effective mulches were those providing both protection from raindrop impact and adher- ence to the soil surface. Anchoring a material with asphalt emulsion provided increased adherence to the soil surface and was generally beneficial. Adherence of the mulches to the soil surface in- creased surface detention of the runoff water and eliminated the undercutting of the mulch material which was a serious problem with some of the nettings. • Originally presented at the Beth Annual Meeting of the Highway Research Board, Washington, D. C., January 16 -20, 1987. ILL I 4J Mulch treatments Wood cellulose Fiberglass Asphalt emulsion Latex Wood cellulose & asphalt emulsion Fiberglass and asphalt emulsion Prairie hay and asphalt emulsion Woodchips and asphalt emulsion Corncobs and asphalt emulsion Kraft paper netting Jute netting Mulch treatment Table 1. Mulch treatments studied for effectiveness In protection against water erosion on 3:1 slope highway cut. Description and method of application Wood cellulose fiber applied hydraulically as a 1000 lb water slurry Continuous filaments of fiberglass applied with 1000 lb compreased air An emulsifiable asphalt diluted 1:1 with water 1200 gal and sprinkled on plot An emulsifiable material diluted 1:6 with water 150 gal and sprayed on plot Wood cellulose fiber anchored with 1:5 asphalt 10001b with emulsion 150 gal Fiberglass anchored with 1:5 asphalt emulsion Prairie hay anchored with 1:5 asphalt cmulsinnb Pine woodchips from a portable chipper and anchored with 1:5 asphalt emulsion Ground corncobs slightly larger than 116 In. in diameter and anchored with 1:5 asphalt emulsion Prairie hay and Prairie hay anchored with tightly twisted kraft wide-weave paper netting with a 2 x 0.5 yarn COVnt netting Wood excelsior mat High -grade wood excelsior covered on both sides with a strong, large mesh. kraft netting Tightly twisted, random-colored kraft netting with a 7 x 4 yarn count Heavy woven jute matting with a 1.8 x 1.1 yarn count . The undiluted volume applied in the case of liquids o Averagee composition of the prairie hay was ,74% bluestem, 23% switchgrass, and miscellaneous grasses and weeds. Table 2. Application• rate per acre 10001b with 150 gel 1 ton with 150 gal 6 ton with 150 gal a ton with 150 gal 1 ton Mulch treatments ranked according to relative ellestiveness for protection against troll erosion. All treatments ere compared to a jute netting mulch used as a check. Highway cut to a 3:1 slope. Jute netting Wood excelsior mat Fiberglass anchored with asphalt emulsion Woodchips anchored with asphalt emulsion Prairie hay anchored with asphalt emulsion Asphalt emulsion Corncobs anchored with asphalt emulsion Prairie hay anchored with wide -weave paper netting Fiberglass Wood cellulose anchored with asphalt emulsion Wood cellulose Kraft paper netting Latex 1.0a 1.1 1.4 2.3 2.5 22.5 4.5 7.9 7.9 8.5 12.9 20.7 25.4 Relative erosion. [Number of times the erosion from jute-net mulch) Average of 3 simulated rainstorms replicated twice for each mulch treatment. t Mulch treatment used for comparison purposes. American Excelsior Company AN EMPLOYEE OWNEO COMPANY STANDARDS OF VELOCITY CAPABILITIES OF AMXCO EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS 905 900TH FRONT Sl YAKIMA, WASHIN(T ION 98501, (509) S/55754 I - Curlex Blankets - light weight netting one (1) side - wood fiber Soil Types - (A) 4.8 LFS (B) 4.8 LFS (C) 3.9 LFS II - Curlex "Hi- Velocity" Blankets - heavy weight netting -two (2) sides - wood fiber Soil Types - (A) 11.0 LFS (B) 9.8 LFS (C) 8.6 LFS III - Enkamat Matting - Nylon fibers Soil Types - (A) 17.5 LFS (B) 16.5 LFS (C) 14.5 LFS These figures are based on ditch lining at over 3%, grade up to 11% to 13 %. On slope protection, the determining factor would be the grade of slope, berms above and sheeting effect of water velocity, etc. In certain environments, especially with type (C) soil, we recommend either,the Hi- Velocity Blankets or the regular Curlex placed under the light 7010 Enkamat or heavier 7020 Enkamat as per on the job inspection by our representative. Soil Types -(A) Clay, clay loam, silty clay (B) Loam, silty clay, sandy clay loam .(C) Very fine sandy loam, fine sandy loam, silty loam American Excelsior Company AN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY To Our Valued Curlex Customers and /or Users: STRAW Durability: 1 year pH: 5.6 to 7.1 609 SOUTH FRONT ST., YAKIMA, WASHINGTON 90901, (509) 575-5794 Much confusion has been brought about recently in regards to Curlex vs. straw blankets. The following should help clear up many misunder- standings. Carbon to Nitrogen Ratio: 128/150 to 1 a) From a nutritional point, .a problem with straw is the high carbon to-nitrogen .ratio ..and _fixation of inorganic nutrients. Plant materials with small C/N ratios are rich in nitrogen, higher values are low in nitrogen, as straw is. The ideal ratio is 25:1. High C/N ratio (as straw) causes nitrogen deficiency because the micro - organisms that attack the straw are more efficient than plants in using the organic nitrogen in the soil. This means that when using straw available nitrogen must be added to the soil. As a rule, three pounds per inch of average annual rainfall of available nitrogen added per acre. Curlex C/N is 45:1 which is acceptable per the USDA - Forest Service and does not require any addition of nitrogen due to the blanket. The use of Curlex will not over -tax soil nitrogen as straw will. pH: 4.6 to 5.1 b) Straw will absorb twice its weight in water. Curlex will absorb four to five times its weight in water. c) Decomposition of straw often leads to production of inhibitory substances to plant growth, usually acetic acid (vinegar). d) Undesirable seeds harvested with straw can conflict with establishment of desired plant species. A prime example of this is occurring presently in New York on an SCS teat site farm where the straw blanket contained Canada thistle, which spreads vigorously by underground stems. Again, Curlex has no such history! e) Straw leaches nutrients from the soil and will not pass the PENN. D.O.T. Leaching Tests. Curlex does and always has stet the requirements of PENN. D.O.T. Testing which is the standard used throughout the U.S. Curlex is a silviculture product - "of, the forest" Straw is an agricultural product - "of the soil" Aspen trees can get sick due to bugs, but they are weeded out prior to or during the long period between harvesting and manufacturing into blankets, Curlex users can be absolutely certain that no weed seeds or fungi are in the blanket when installed. Straw, being an agricultural product with a short life, contains not only other seed and fungi, but the inherent ability to produce toxic substances such as acetic acid. And lastly, due to fiber structure, Curlex dissipates rainfall at a higher level while absorbing over twice as much water as straw, and uniquely . cling to the soil by virtue of its mechanical machination. The curling process of the log gives Curlex fibers the ability to latch onto each other thus creating a consistent mesh over the soil. Any further questions, please cull us at American excelsior Company, Yakima, WA. (509) 575 -5794. Contributing Sources: USDA - Forest Service - Willis Vogel N.E. Testing Lab University of Wyoming Range Science Dept. Wyoming Highway, Dept. New York State SCS - George Stang American Excelsior Company AN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY ADVANTAGES OF AMXCO'S SOIL EROSION BLANKET 609 SOUTH FRONT SL, Y■KIMA, WASHIN;; I ON 90901. (509) 5%5 ;V9q 1. CURLEX FIBER (A) Barbed curled fiber expands and entwines to form a single unit, retaining moisture and adhering to the soil. 2. PROMOTES TURF ESTABLISHMENT (A) Provides environmental conditions for seedling growth (1) Retains moisture (2) Provides humidity (3) Reduces temperature fluctuation (4) Protects against burnout but still provides sufficient sunlight for normal healthy growth (5) Contains no weed seed 3. CONTROLS EROSION (A) The ends of the fibers work into the soil, stabilizing the surface (B) The dense fiber network breaks up rain drops, allowing the soil to absorb water (C) Once the soil is saturated, the Curlex Blanket acts as a filter retaining the seed and soil during water run -off (D) Adheres to the contour of the terrain (doesn't bridge), eliminates rill erosion and prevents gully erosion 4. AMERICAN MADE PRODUCT (A) A manufactured product, utilizing prime wood (not a by- product) (B) Readily available upon demand (C) National distribution, providing local service through our branches Curlex Blankets must be thought of as a critical area. product to be used on slopes 3 to 1 or steeper, in median strips or as a ditch liner. Principally, in areas of expected erosion problems such as grassy waterways and . steel slopes. TYPE REGULAR American Excelsior Company AN PAN OYEE OWNFU UOMPANY 850 AVC NUE H EAST. PO. BOX 5067, ARL INGION. TEXAS 76005. 5061.(81 7) 640 -1 555, ' 735298 AM(XCO. FAX all 7) 649.1816 WATER RETENTION /ABSORPTION CAPABILITIES OF STRAW BLANKETS VS. EXCELSIOR BLANKETS Recently, there has been a good deal of confusion about which product, straw or excelsior, actually retains more water. In an effort to eliminate this confusion in the industry, United States Testing Company compiled the following test data using new materials sampled at random from full factory rolls of straw and excelsior blankets. The following test results prove conclusively that excelsior products retain /absorb more water than straw blankets. The value of greater water retention is twofold: (1) a reduction of the erosive effects of water run-off and (2) more moisture is available to the seedbed to encourage growth. NORTH AMERICAN GREEN 1.42 LBS. PER SQ. YARD S -75 (100% STRAW) WOOD EXCELSIOR (AVERAGE) DIFFERENCE HEAVY DUTY NORTH AMERICAN GREEN SC -150 (70% STRAW & 30% COCONUT FIBER) WOOD EXCELSIOR (HI- VELOCITY) n1 I TEST COMPARISON OF STRAW COMPOSITION VS. EXCELSIOR COMPOSITION WEIGHT (LBS.) OF WATER RETAINED PER SQUARE YARD 1.72 LBS. PER SQ. YARD .30 LBS. PER SQ. YARD - 21% GREATER 1.35 LBS. PER SQ. YARD 2.67 LBS. PER SQ. YARD DIFFERENCE 1.32 LBS. PER SQ. YARD - 98% GREATER CONCLUSIONS 1. The Regular, Standard Excelsior Blankets absorbs .30 lbs. per square yard more water than the S -75 Straw Blankets. 2, For areas of greater volume and velocity flows, the Heavy Duty, Hi- Velocity Excelsior Blankets were compared to the combination straw /coconut product, SC -150. The excelsior products produced more dramatic results, absorbing 1.32 lbs. per square yard more water than the straw /coconut blanket. This is 98% more absorbed moisture. The addition of coconut fiber actually reduces the overall absorption capabilities of straw blankets. 3. The excelsior blankets are heavier than straw blankets (up to 224% heavier) and they retain /absorb more water. This results in better contact with the soil surface further improving the protection afforded by excelsior blankets. SPECIFICATION: The Curlex Erosion Control /Revegetation Blanket is a machine - produced mat of curled and barbed Aspen wood excelsior. Fibers are 80% 6 inch or longer. Fiber is evenly distributed throughout the blanket and is of consistent thickness. The top of each Curlex Blanket is covered with a photodegradable plastic mesh. Curlex is smolder resistant without the use of chemical additives. APPLICATIONS: Steep Slopes (to 1:1) Mine Revegetation Landfill Revegetation Ditches Ski Slopes High Altitude Revegetation Other Problem Areas LIMITATIONS: CURLEX Curlex Blankets should not be used on areas where flow will exceed 6 fps or on areas with slope gradient greater than 1:1. Refer to Hi- Velocity Curlex, Ground Anchor System or Composites Section for higher velocity erosions protection methods or consult American Excelsior Specialist. ROLL SIZE Width Length Weight Per Roll Square Yards Per Roll 3 48 in. ( +/— 1 in.) 180 ft. average 78 lbs. (+ /— 10 %) 80 average krartil (it* 7f,#o " \. !NAY!" -ire sit W1/4 tit4 r 4.Cr °: 4,, 4 .• 0 in... si • f2 ,S40.t.,Aze ( r .filo( , 1/4-0N,16 '1; AV -te Affre TA' tpr t-I4/1) 1,‘N ' ("X r.11.d. s ' AL r.rkt roAa. r ` rl•W ..4'a Vib itli dim d ik kf# $5; 7 q7.01 it e ) r ;74ti, tan r • 4 :0 t ria-ts.. 4 '' ' <1 'SR" t.N■Iv.‘,...., Of W n I ' \\\ 1 , , ,,,,,,,,- nit 0 .-- 0:,,,..._ my , (.4teilkr:(4t 0 e 10 ',, hs . t , I tirlaray 4 41 .:4ic.grrisot?'7 i y. 'ct 6 : 7 , : ii ilM,ifltt r4 7/5 - tt a •Tifire Pp/ . ckc::*<;:, ,. 1/4. I r, :f r k el se- ‘, ., t - 4 0 , .9 A., ,44°-/: --; -„t eie i i, 0, i:41. 0•Ple, eAre ii ,_ i , . • - 0 409.1x.c4- •-• - t r :• r i,q bl;. 4 1.1f. 1 f 1 4 )! :tri.;;; I • il . " r . • # r $ $.2(417 v p • vi .1 s *"- • ' 4' NtA.H p * orifAish,,,k•i—vt.:-.--7- • . ,•° • ,4 / 4 , tw , 4 Larit Jttvitg Eastern Region 1. Atlanta Area Woodbury, GA' 30293 P.O. Box 669 (404) 553 -5641 2. Baltimore Area Annapolis Jct., MD 20701 P.O. Box 25 (301) 725 -0464 3. Birmingham Area Gardendale, AL 35071 2405 Decatur Hwy. P.O. Box 945 (205) 631 -2335 4. Cincinnati, OH 45216 415 W. Seymour Avenue (513) 761 -7384 5. Cleveland, OH 44114 3875 King Ave. (216) 881 -1122 6. Detroit Area Westland MI 48185 1210 Manufacturers Dr. (313) 722 -4540 7. Pittsburgh, PA 15208 214 N. Lexington Ave. P.O. Box 56892 (412) 247 -5414 Central Region 8. Chicago Area Lombard, IL 60148 1111 North DuPage Avenue (312) 627 -3200 9. Dallas /Fort Worth Area Arlington, TX 76011 900 Avenue H East P.O. Box 5624 (817) 640 -2161 10. Minneapolis. MN 55414 3101 Talmadge Avenue, SE (612) 331 -1831 Where to find us! 11. New Orleans, LA 70181 501 Coolidge Street P.O. Box 10532 (504) 837 -5834 12. North Kansas City, MO 64116 1612 Taney Street P.O. Box 12320 (816) 842 -3034 13. North Little Rock. AR 72117 P O. Box 3311 313 Phillips Road (501) 945 -4661 14. Oklahoma City. OK 73127 5011 West Reno P.O. Box 270786 (405) 946 -0512 15. St. Louis. MO 63132 1203 Ambassador Blvd. P.O. Box 12414 (314) 993 -5540 16. Sheboygan, WI 53081 3127 S. 31st Street P.O. Box 249 (414) 458 -4333 Western Region 22. 17. Albuquerque, NM 87107 4019 Edith Boulevard. NE P.O. Box 6494 (505) 345- 7806 23. 18. Amarillo, TX 79120 803 S. Garfield P.O. Box 30249 (806) 373 -8371 19. Denver. CO 80229 6475 Franklin Street (303) 287 -3261 25. 20. 0 Paso, TX 79923 3842 Durazno P.O. Box 3641 26. (915) 542 -1657 American Excelsior Company AN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY HOME OFFICE: P.O. Box 5067/850 Ave. H East /Arlington, Texas 76011/(817) 640 -1555 FAX (817) 649 -7816 TELEX 735298 AMEXCO 21. Los Angeles Area Pico Rivera, CA 90660 8320 Caniord Street P.O. Box 245 (213) 949 -2461 Phoenix, AZ 85043 6031 W. Washington (602) 269 -3860 Sacramento, CA 95824 8139 Elder Creek Road (916) 383 -3835 24. Salt Lake City. UT 84054 350 N. Redwood Rd. P.O. Box 538 (801) 292 -6060 Tucson, AZ 85713 3300 East 36th Street (602) 623 -0394 Yakima. WA 98901 609 South Front Street (509) 575 -5794 Mr. Gary Nelson Spokane County Public Works Department North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99260 -0170 Dear Gary. V. Lennie Husa P. E. Consulting Engineer E. 11020 18th Avenue Spokane. WA 99206 509- 924 -1298 April 25. 1991 I'm submitting herewith 2 check prints on the drainage revision through lot 2, block 2 of the Valley Vista Estates for your office review and approval. I have revised the previous drawings submitted to you March 25. 1991 as requested in your response comments on April 9. 1.991. In item #6 of your comments on the check print. you requested proof that this material will stand on 1.5 to 1 slope over a period of time. It is my professional opinion that with a reasonable maintenance program. 1.5 to 1 slope will work satisfactorily at this location because we will be providing a rock riprap lined channel to convey the expected channel flow through this reach and we will be providing a grass vegetative cover over the slope above the expected channel flow as a channel protective measure from localized rainfall and run -off. The soils will stand on 1.5 to 1 slope especially since there isn't any measurable seepage forces acting on the channel banks at this location. Enclosures: 2 copies check prints copy of previous submittal w /comments Since V. Lennie Husa P.E. 342 - Caution: Do not plant legumes on dams or dikes. They attrac rodents. D. Mulching: Mulching may be needed for wind or water erosion control on disturbed slopes. 1. Use cereal or grass seed straw at the rate of 11- to 2 -tons per acre (70 to 90 pounds per 1,000 square feet). Scatter the straw uniformly and anchor it with jute, wire netting, a disc set straight, asphault emulsion, or other adhesive. A hydromulcher will apply straw and adhesive in one operation. 2. Wood chips, sawdust. or manure can be used in place of straw. Apply uniformly to a loose depth of 3/4 of 1- inch. 3. Follow job sheet on "Protective Materials for Erosion and Sediment Control on Critical Areas ". See Code 484 Mulching Specifications. E. Fertilizing: 1. Determine needs from a soil test. complete fertilizer is needed. In Actual nitrogen N 40 to 80 lbs /A Phosphoric Acid P 60 lbs /A Potash K 60 lbs /A 2. When straw, sawdust, or woodchip mulches 20 pounds per acre of nitrogen for every material. Where subsoil is exposed, a lieu of a soil test use: 1 -2 lbs /1000 sq. ft. 1.5 lbs /1000 sq. ft. 1.5 lbs /1000 sq. ft. are used, add an additional ton per acre of dry mulch F. Sodding: On small, steep or critical sites or waterways where immediate perennial cover is needed in 15 "+ rainfall areas only, or under irrigation. 1. Cut sod strips 11 inches thick from specially planted nurseries of adapted species or old seed fields of Kentucky bluegrass. 2. Lay sod strips on the prepared, fertilized arca close together, up and down on steep slopes 2:1 or greater, and on the contour on gentle slopes. Stagger the joints of the sod piece ends. 3. Topdress with topsoil and work the soil into the cracks between sod strips. 4. Pack the sod lightly and stake it down with pegs on steep or critical sites. 5. Sprinkle daily to keep sod moist for 10 -14 days to get the sod firmly established. SCS -WA- November 1982 1� be pulled and tied onto, the outside Aso the ,eed is -i press- dr i bl� l era into the furrow. L)ra��l- c:l'�a i ns �.,r wheels can be used to cover the seed, if needed. Under _,erne surnrnerfal low situations the soil may fluffy. very dry I it e become ubecome L and and t -iffy. anc t: may not ', possible to obtain a firm seedbed. In this t.a.EP 1 o not try to f i r m the seedbed but 'work: with what is there. Concentrate on getting the seed placed shallow. There are a number of ways this can be done. One procedure is to pull the Hoses loose on the drills and broadcast the seed. The action of the d r i l l and drag- chains w i l l adequately cover the s e e d . I f the seedbed is cloddy, i t w i l l normally be necessary to use drag or something behind the drill to cover the seed. For - those situations where the seed still cannot be placed shallow, the use of aerial seeding could be considered. To seed shallow in heavy residue and attain good seed -soil contact, use a shovel or hoe -type drill. Set the chisel point deep enough to clean residue away frc the furrow. Full the tubes and tie them so the seed is dribbled into the furrow. Use the press - wheels to provide the seed -soil contact. H. Refer to Technical Note Plant Materials - 16 for - guidance when planning a planting. I. Follow soil test results for proper fertilization. Sites should have 20 lbs. of N and 30 lbs. of F• available at seeding time. On fields with a recent cropping history, this should be available without additional fertilizer. Legumes may need 15 1hs of sulfur. Two to three tons of lime may be needed for West -coast soils. Trace minerals should be added if known deficiencies occur. Be careful of over - fertilization on new seedings as weeds will benefit as much as the desired species. J. Exclude all livestock from the planting. See the sper.ificatior for Livestock Ex-472. K. Weed control is vital for survival of new seed1ngs. Clipping or spraying several times may be needed to control weeds. Noxious weeds roust be t;cS 4.A -Fehr uary 1709 12 to 15 inches of annual rainfall (cont.) Cover sheep fescue or Canb: canby bluegrass 15 to 18 inches of annual rainfall Durar hard fescue 10 and Nordan crested wheatgrass 10 or Sherman big bluegrass or Sodar streamhank wheatgrass or Whitmar beardless wheatgrass or Luna pubescent wheatgrass 18 to 22 inches of annual rainfall Durar hard fescue 10 and Whitmar beardless wheatgrass or Tegmar dwarf intermediate wheatgrass or Kentucky bluegrass 22 or more inches of annual rainfall Tegmar dwarf intermediate wheatgrass or Manchar smooth bronegrass or Kentucky bluegrass Low wet areas Alta fescue or Creeping foxtail For calcareous, saline or alkaline areas Alkar tall wheatgrass 3. Seeding Suggestions 342 -9 10 pounds per acre 4 pounds per acre 20 pounds per acre 10 pounds per acre 1S pounds per acre 20 pounds per acre 20 pounds per acre 1S pounds per acre 8 pounds per acre 15 pounds per acre 15 pounds per acre 8 pounds per acre 20 pounds per acre 10 pounds per acre 1S pounds per acre In areas of 15 or more inches of annual precipitation, perennial or annual ryegrass, at not more than 10 percent of the mixture, may be added to give quick cover. In areas of 18 or more inches of annual precipitation, 1 pound per acre of alsike or white dutch clover may he added to give quick cover. SCS -NA- November HI:? United States Department of Agriculture Bob Turner Spokane County Engineers Office Spokane, Washington Dear Bob, I gave the following information to Lenny Husa for the seeding specifications for the Valley Vista Estates project. 1. Fertilize at 20 pounds of available Nitrogen per acre. 2. Till to prepare a seedbed. 3. Seed to Durar hard fescue 15 pound (Pure Live Seed) per acre. 4. Cover with erosion control blanket as per specification of blanket manfacture. 1 used the technical specifications as listed in out technical guides. Sinceredly, Car 16. enn Soil Conservationist Soil Conservation Service N. 222 Havana Spokane, Wn. 99202 Phone: 353 - 2120 MAy 10, 1991 - eoJ 1k tes-k- Zv - 80 tb �pJ a c"e . is (v ) 777/ 5-04 S United States Department of Agriculture Bob Turner Spokane County Engineers Office Spokane, Washington Dear Bob, Soil Conservation Service N. 222 Havana Spokane, Wn. 99202 Phone: 353 -2120 MAy 10, 1991 I gave the following information to Lenny Husa for the seeding specifications for the Valley Vista Estates project. 1. Fertilize at 20 pounds of available Nitrogen per acre. 2. Till to prepare a seedbed. 3. Seed to Durar hard fescue 15 pound (Pure Live Seed) per acre. 4. Cover with erosion control blanket as per specification of blanket manfacture. I used the technical specifications as listed in out technical guides. Sinceredly, Carl B.`Venn�� es _ Soil Conservationist P r i occr R h , E a u b J 8 \ c P. 9 \ \ \‘‘..,,, 157 47 %' \ \ URAUJ > '' +oP05 0 \� EY 2vutE RIVEW Y ?' P"6ox \ \ ' S. V. '[o2 \o RAinJ�16142 Po" wit* \ rJ I2° I-IvEK PI \ ,� \ (iyH1 u�! N�o-1 Roy f6 A • \ 7 of O \ it t Exley CUWEfi1 ,o- 2.. SL.oUL ZC vAL-Lt• vlcitA �iTATES +x+ PF:0Post:0 AZIVwAt "ToR o ABDv 0 ti 1 ��RAGE • 154 b e.I,,JER LEvE�— q0.0; SHOP (5u600 — 104, 3 UPGSR ,GVEI, - 104.1 NORTH .x151 SST I4JALL .oPINf1 Tor (9.Evi5E10 MAKE '(UP SOTS PLAN I " - ;QI GovT LdT°1 ;eEG.4 T. 24 N., AJ - h % 1. COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF .\AGiHINGtTON u/ tt- o01nIG1 -rot= K1EtJ n :or. c Re-t iJALL ?�(Ht lox t-0' ABo.ie C SAQa) 0A1 4/ n LJAU. a,. ,' L OV.I h C y w hl !> LOI.1 L L,J A L. L- ATTACHED �H�L( iJA�I, 0 -tAI WAVY DIM -NS REIIJFOROILICI HEIGHT OF WALK BASE A 6 G S BARS II E3AR5 11 Z Il BARS I D O' 5 - 10' (n" g' 4'-0"" 4 4t15'*5gi5 "%t15" b1- a ll 4 0 Gil 5 -4" 4 4e 15 I * 4 - t 15" $1- O" 31: 2" 6. " o n 21 - 1,4e lc: #5215 o4e 32' 41- oil 2 211 (0 " 8l1 I' -O" tritt I& 090.15" men. RETAUN@ G WALL DETAR. '4.1%5 ETA 86MING WALL SCHEDULE +36 RAI MK," HIG — 1 -4-5 cOMY c Top op MALI, 1 111I�iIl „ l r P2ovIDE FREE DR r�CFIw Fv(L I' -o' HIN BEHIND WAI).- 0 • `�° " X 1 BARS II Y BARS HoI0 2 covER. ovER, vERT !>AR5 1." k4 E P H014- t 41 -0" 0.c.. z: E3042-, #4 coNT& Z4 "oa. (Z•HIN) 2 c} oak K-EY F7/c DOb.IF.L Tv HA1LH Ea "kJ" gaFL ° e.scj„ ct. h' ' ar / rn S'6 ft C !yip f b-v;- r s / 6 i 1 - 3 . 6 3 1-' 2 xtsf -(1 Pi S*4 102.+37.6 /. ernov ■ 3 x t rrry h is c sit l Fr�rri nr ahhai 3 f, 3 .6 FeC 1a ,5- r it C7 1 " and Shgpe in/ GGj /"lI1e 1 99 - 460 'Ao S - ca c q #- a o 7 7 `r a T7 5r i L517 n s 7 t1. ra r/ t-a f'c> , 5 - '7 4 4 • 994-80 .2L.47 574 S ed eat- / le c 7a/7/7 4f7KS '742:1 cliq pine 57"A4 / ®/ f 35 ai-t3 pipe a ! / 1 ~ - r s c‹. 1-- / p rap s , / 1' 564' ; �s f-�t s � � n c s • Z, Ci �1 d ,sfar be 0 r-� r � a 7` '= 1:1-'1- o f f c + f� f-c "t r ,rte ' .. � :. �c S e. e ded 7 q` r --05 ' c , ' ,�`, ' e cee cal' b e'd ' * . fo a : i t-A e r~- f -- e ef.1 r �� s c � -= i�- p d c��- c�s� -�- a �s Q.s �ci ra of !D /h5 .Oa,crc.. a Cr x f` /I'ez. ' . : " 7 t c r, ire 2"d 2 • c Z poldsr -ta me s S ' at'( 4Pfl /1 ?d + >I &�o � cJii . / Jo0 tbs/a:re. - -t -- he 5, 1 d i/ ! b acs r wr �xt� t- sr ,� b /egAIRe #- ,j LICIT . els crt-7�'t"/Ce n . ' i..'.ei¢" / C'tw /`.t7 `df?i''tiJ C'ri - /fi ÷ b lea mere+ s k a J/ he /' ii,57 /ed < 4 a fl c 4 - d - 7'-dts Sp . ci ted by the /41 410 : t C4cf�tst'eI'd / �. h E 1-a' S, ; S e d J f, 44-4,,,14,/c1- �¢* / , .'1°'.+' d +�: fed c� '. �ko1$ut`0 Vr �?azu S /2 9m * 'e a pp /1GCl'(-'/aG� sd, f d - " ' !dlCdtc'4r /h�►ur: per- /6d Ft-e-e ek .� J/ 47 a'e � ~ °C `~;'4,s fI/ < 4 »' 4 X / /» 'e f"e77 - C e' Lu rdj� DRAWN E:V1SE �NG'�Ttl rot,. Ili! d U lm YO " Sra. 6' Co. WML- 570. Co. TYPE *. freaPa MP. 2 PTN ez.75.5 "es" ,ir.spwgzr Co A/c. r (#7sewr.Caar. 5 72; DEPTH CRyseloo 5ade,.4 ce .h/5D07: 5e. od g.1D d* 6'7°36'55 E /9. 5' :r 09.22' -* /8.7/' 1 ) Efrrc5 ,4PPROVAL. 1:317ele iT ea,eg 1. 87 ° 26.'55" • '' Z. 0982' /8.7/' /0 6 7EwA/5/774,t/ DEnerit. 5,qr. z 12:1 8,ge,e CaR:ts d'87t3d,'55" R. /9. So 29.82 C42. S Ft) T ?CAD 6 0.1".L,1) ,T (..owipil3 1712 ez/Rzie 4..96 ea.00 2' 23.4.5' 2237' 730 I zr ' 1-' 1 1,0.4 ZI. A 5 A/ eSmaYE 54,177-/ 5/OE CaR 13 /A/ TEMP, Ca- 6. e k/Az,c 7'4RA/ (AloRrHwoot:, 2*:!? Xfolzr/1 4 7, Re,..4,q7A1 6 /". W°' 49:ac.e 6 6.6ca 7o R zeloo• Tr /i./O• fl /.4 > 7 . Ebro& a." Caies 6O'V5'/O R. //. 72' 7 o c a ' /2' /2' 8' J -2% .....---- 0. _az L - ..1 - --4 age, Cues 4.87°26'55" R. /9.50' 4'2982' Tr /'7/' 5e 7,CO34AIS/7 DE7',47/e. Co. At-LTA 5T4712 pc•e■ Me. Ste 1J 1.4 • 0 „, 2' g BACK et./28 4.60 R. 20.00' 21.2/' Tr /Z72' 8 4e * -2 5ro. o. TYPE "R"edas O. DeprA* Coss 4 :5 - , 4 75,H/747 - i.V5z70.r Spec. 6.7.5,cw. CoAir 5 33 ComAt DEPTH eez/sHea 5uie,,4ce che's , 14/5 L' a D.O. T - 56 r/eA/ .5 2 off 2 '"" t g/ - 2/ / 7. 8' ei ,F/1--3-./- Fr/-e 33 N o CF 0 v) sY- ° ©fir 64 1 4 37,6/ f a z,,e isiss » 'c1h h a / 57`'4 I ( Z r,�-g C !v! s71/41 l a 1 t 38 741c 42 XIS/ - /Y - I Pei an/7u /e 8/ 51-a 1 0 4 - 3 7 , 4 , - Re n o c. e_xt5i1ny 34s" c /v; p fr'3/`77 4# sT`ci' lcs ¢ 37,6/ a o /� b /f c'd frO MJ 7` l6 `d a /em s d v t iLf ter / v6• e a5 7 a r P/_ Je c 67 reQ 24 X 38 PRINTED ON NO. 1000H CLEARPRINT s z0 ?o 2090 .5 _EC. 4- Z. 10 0 0 st47`/ ns Cr- Pl. s7,-Q 16 6f t oo Op e /7 mss' 7" 2' E E 1.S' AC 2/ /70,,C x rs7c/ny G. M, P r PLA Recon sfruc7 and shop /e4 Gkar7/7e/ fl S'f ? f /6a fo 57-a 9 q 4 - 8 0 14-0 7 - /"Q h S/ -/-/ b 17 e.. leo 1-/77/,4- a /7 d 5 r77 a o 7* /P . : 757 // rack rip cG/4r;rsel beih / C'/"r5 7cecf /brd Sf4 9# eo g, /o1+3e. s e - t 7`6 /h /e f c hra /7 e / loar7kS 'fa 9 -75 S Cci 10/ • ROFJ L 'Poll de rose Dr/ 1/e Nl 86 -Z' 3 G "W E , a■re/716•117 1 ' VA LL a ` 70 c <� /Q, � o, 6,9- , „/ d a / '' ° r) 4 Ica i SLUG v s X. h et a-5 CO CP t k-N M 43 `' S rA E 6 '” ,T .E S r c 4, s`. p p c "X 'oG Qrct, 1 02 , SZX 6' 1 03 J. 51 2_-18`' C 1 P- 5C/'rL E / • 0 ' 6•,-c a nd L. t'i- e X- 5eG7` - /G/7 5ec*1 i GIIol7g Ci /We / & pipe P //re PIPE ;` E I Q T A s 7/4 /e/ L38 APPROVED 6•y PROPER?'' 0w NE DATE 't 1 /'a ci /' ip /-a,aCi b o'l2 r pr-c fec p? a/`ti 4/17 ' pi. 1e ,APPROVED, By Dave LOP E is te NOT F5 s eed Q DAr / as showr/i d/4 Na 49 7"h channel h ro G S' covet %�, tr sAAs;, : / • 49 °F � r e f$1 st te's,/ ®® :� SCALE: / "•■ gip ► j..�► 4 111114 4 - oper Sa DATE: )0/21M° s - 4 'r P'r.O d/ 041 C - SECTIO " gg•ao f-a s*l /0/438 S'-our'd L.i# e F /face l'aci cha/7f7e/ ha/7 -fr�a .s/ //Oil f /�, .9 cir 441,1 , .Age ,,S .7(4 f.,7z 9 14 8o Ust ` ` . fi es da / 1, a t/ / o c:. t- � p t- s / e saz 5 to n es to s- r r ri 7 the A e s 2. ail d teas no ' pt-otec* b - rock r / /;rc7,w S'h // eded 9 -Q c. e r°.. - t Lie 5'e d 6 S s � -J e l l c.4.. d 5 e . d e d - Inc) 6• i ) e t c t- e e/ J? red f� s cce a ,' - "c d 9 e cerqt - h v >cescue 7'h,e a o / h.s /ac, -e . a rr, a f--c r of / f e .- r / le z. t-- c 0 /7 t c / r").r7 S �� n � 74rd5per7 C c hd z o , p h o_s ha s 4a(I 2 4 P/- 1 /eel w / e n weed /.,s Q/-- z.•5'o /bs cicre,i e ost/ / d ur /th c/`! t- cssios7 c 4 : 7 I/1-423-1 b l ° e ih sf s uch as C /rr,e1"' /cet.�t x -t b/lafKe+ . * $ err, J/ be /�sf //ac gb d7 C an 14.21 _-_ " e-74 efr4la S b th /4,7 ah �"rec 7��t�";✓°r., 3. 'The, 6r-405.5 5e d - lc / 134 ol 7 '✓r oae-d.us p /o#i749 - .c54 �"a p f‘-c tit de 4 d tee lc ppllc /a . s h a // be tic ea //7au>;- � r - y - Ae "-I .5 es /rs r.m pe476.d Fr le- ecrehrr' 11947' a '/:3cr ,"c "�s' Crl/ 4e a' oal• 4, -f-he s e e bed shall be hand - t - 1 /led pr-/o f-- see ina ` 71-� 9 ood � szc d bed.. 5 a tcick c using a *'c16 'i*friny o en+ sucj o (j / vG r7 , 'r�C/� ��� C J'. r� � U � J shall be oi,o//ed ` © - thee s , 6•c pt- + � h e pic2c.e e. /• -� t- e r o s l c h G l'} t°o ` b l ct , k * Gl + 1 l- c1 7r- o - S/ c ct-dt. R EVIS /DNS APPROVED BY: r e V l s 6•d 14'7 0 -,/-es add f9E9 e4141t'e yt eseas "Channel e £ ? /w c cabs re • Reduc . .=A ac./w -ackfecti c ha Ain e/ VA V. Lennie Huse) so P. E. c ©15 6019 -m X 1°73 /f?+.°et- G -1 3/23_/q/ la /36/cfo DATE DRAINAGE PLAN L DT 2 , 3 LO C kt 2 1 R REVISED !/ Proted DRAWN BY v CeL ESTATE S DRAWING NUMBER CS OK a N �� 01 ` C GroVnd� 0 4' 0 � � ;ii Q �, h �o N � o a - . ` a6• �� N a o 09 � _` 4 .1 0.W --- x v it, tv ... � c N P'► g/ - 2/ / 7. 8' ei ,F/1--3-./- Fr/-e 33 N o CF 0 v) sY- ° ©fir 64 1 4 37,6/ f a z,,e isiss » 'c1h h a / 57`'4 I ( Z r,�-g C !v! s71/41 l a 1 t 38 741c 42 XIS/ - /Y - I Pei an/7u /e 8/ 51-a 1 0 4 - 3 7 , 4 , - Re n o c. e_xt5i1ny 34s" c /v; p fr'3/`77 4# sT`ci' lcs ¢ 37,6/ a o /� b /f c'd frO MJ 7` l6 `d a /em s d v t iLf ter / v6• e a5 7 a r P/_ Je c 67 reQ 24 X 38 PRINTED ON NO. 1000H CLEARPRINT s z0 ?o 2090 .5 _EC. 4- Z. 10 0 0 st47`/ ns Cr- Pl. s7,-Q 16 6f t oo Op e /7 mss' 7" 2' E E 1.S' AC 2/ /70,,C x rs7c/ny G. M, P r PLA Recon sfruc7 and shop /e4 Gkar7/7e/ fl S'f ? f /6a fo 57-a 9 q 4 - 8 0 14-0 7 - /"Q h S/ -/-/ b 17 e.. leo 1-/77/,4- a /7 d 5 r77 a o 7* /P . : 757 // rack rip cG/4r;rsel beih / C'/"r5 7cecf /brd Sf4 9# eo g, /o1+3e. s e - t 7`6 /h /e f c hra /7 e / loar7kS 'fa 9 -75 S Cci 10/ • ROFJ L 'Poll de rose Dr/ 1/e Nl 86 -Z' 3 G "W E , a■re/716•117 1 ' VA LL a ` 70 c <� /Q, � o, 6,9- , „/ d a / '' ° r) 4 Ica i SLUG v s X. h et a-5 CO CP t k-N M 43 `' S rA E 6 '” ,T .E S r c 4, s`. p p c "X 'oG Qrct, 1 02 , SZX 6' 1 03 J. 51 2_-18`' C 1 P- 5C/'rL E / • 0 ' 6•,-c a nd L. t'i- e X- 5eG7` - /G/7 5ec*1 i GIIol7g Ci /We / & pipe P //re PIPE ;` E I Q T A s 7/4 /e/ L38 APPROVED 6•y PROPER?'' 0w NE DATE 't 1 /'a ci /' ip /-a,aCi b o'l2 r pr-c fec p? a/`ti 4/17 ' pi. 1e ,APPROVED, By Dave LOP E is te NOT F5 s eed Q DAr / as showr/i d/4 Na 49 7"h channel h ro G S' covet %�, tr sAAs;, : / • 49 °F � r e f$1 st te's,/ ®® :� SCALE: / "•■ gip ► j..�► 4 111114 4 - oper Sa DATE: )0/21M° s - 4 'r P'r.O d/ 041 C - SECTIO " gg•ao f-a s*l /0/438 S'-our'd L.i# e F /face l'aci cha/7f7e/ ha/7 -fr�a .s/ //Oil f /�, .9 cir 441,1 , .Age ,,S .7(4 f.,7z 9 14 8o Ust ` ` . fi es da / 1, a t/ / o c:. t- � p t- s / e saz 5 to n es to s- r r ri 7 the A e s 2. ail d teas no ' pt-otec* b - rock r / /;rc7,w S'h // eded 9 -Q c. e r°.. - t Lie 5'e d 6 S s � -J e l l c.4.. d 5 e . d e d - Inc) 6• i ) e t c t- e e/ J? red f� s cce a ,' - "c d 9 e cerqt - h v >cescue 7'h,e a o / h.s /ac, -e . a rr, a f--c r of / f e .- r / le z. t-- c 0 /7 t c / r").r7 S �� n � 74rd5per7 C c hd z o , p h o_s ha s 4a(I 2 4 P/- 1 /eel w / e n weed /.,s Q/-- z.•5'o /bs cicre,i e ost/ / d ur /th c/`! t- cssios7 c 4 : 7 I/1-423-1 b l ° e ih sf s uch as C /rr,e1"' /cet.�t x -t b/lafKe+ . * $ err, J/ be /�sf //ac gb d7 C an 14.21 _-_ " e-74 efr4la S b th /4,7 ah �"rec 7��t�";✓°r., 3. 'The, 6r-405.5 5e d - lc / 134 ol 7 '✓r oae-d.us p /o#i749 - .c54 �"a p f‘-c tit de 4 d tee lc ppllc /a . s h a // be tic ea //7au>;- � r - y - Ae "-I .5 es /rs r.m pe476.d Fr le- ecrehrr' 11947' a '/:3cr ,"c "�s' Crl/ 4e a' oal• 4, -f-he s e e bed shall be hand - t - 1 /led pr-/o f-- see ina ` 71-� 9 ood � szc d bed.. 5 a tcick c using a *'c16 'i*friny o en+ sucj o (j / vG r7 , 'r�C/� ��� C J'. r� � U � J shall be oi,o//ed ` © - thee s , 6•c pt- + � h e pic2c.e e. /• -� t- e r o s l c h G l'} t°o ` b l ct , k * Gl + 1 l- c1 7r- o - S/ c ct-dt. R EVIS /DNS APPROVED BY: r e V l s 6•d 14'7 0 -,/-es add f9E9 e4141t'e yt eseas "Channel e £ ? /w c cabs re • Reduc . .=A ac./w -ackfecti c ha Ain e/ VA V. Lennie Huse) so P. E. c ©15 6019 -m X 1°73 /f?+.°et- G -1 3/23_/q/ la /36/cfo DATE DRAINAGE PLAN L DT 2 , 3 LO C kt 2 1 R REVISED !/ Proted DRAWN BY v CeL ESTATE S DRAWING NUMBER 24 X 36 PRINTED ON NO. 1000H CLEARPRINT s 33 I Z10r.D a090 2_ o3O 0 i0 G 4- T2 F l • 57`ct ,es a E':.5f,n4& r�yr YM ` P / k a/e n sfa it z �y c #Vf/ -¢ #b t -. 57 /6 1 t 38 t'o ex1S7' e7 #767e o 51 1d G. +37. '. Rerno>y e xt5f/hy 3a c m P f cirn ra :�k iaa# 37,6/ r` 1 TB M 2./ 17, 8'7 - 7"a of w ,r- ° ele . 4' b (5/ /4 'F 7 F /re h 9 ra"77 /ac °- ed /e' /1 _1 5 1fhel -/" / g; e a r - r- -7 Dr 1 .' '90 11-1 h %� 1 o r �3s,3 c, • PLAN Reco sfr-uc ' and shlpp 1i /e7< char-7,-7e/ f / / S fq 9 f / 6 a 7 .S7 9 f Sa - f - o f 17 517 c r: a / co r ra? /5 Q Pi d S /7, n 5 7 r1 // /: c k rt, rap c %/ a r717 e / ba /11 /7 / [� 7Lec tic st4 9 l `I ,# S fa 57``-01 send ear l /h /ef c h r/r1 e a ' , ' - - - 740 , 9ft - $- c- ayet -. 5fa / i n5) 100 C x 4 I t l4__ 5- fe1 CIF c 1, r S' .!2/-ar r. aye E.x ts7 G • M, 1Q - Po r de rasa DP • NM 4-a' 3G" iv1 E eo A L L / R 4 E 0 c yr ' x 6 - PROF LE BLOC $ • O � r S --s---A E - - T- E S L -4ts � C, �V r 0 -a- 3 J><. -1,71 a.- 1,8 eMps th-e le" 5ecf Ice' a /on 9 1 f ?re & pipe X- Se /or r 7 P/ c / d'/te 7 PIPE ‘.5 TA- /s/ -f38 • PPR_ VE 1J sy PR0PER7 ' 0\evNER G • D q E ` ` - 6 roU+id 11I'I Pia( , 0174" P /me rE Wks E HE PERMIT Er,+ APPROVED s( DEA LOP Lis °hc / . 0" ORS Ems e.- t$: .54c.c.,di o G. Pia n CANL X- SECTION ---/ r0 4f 5 / /7011 X . {/ &e? c.4- 4,' = e 544 9s1 f0 S* /O1 r cs a ; /it. �. \ 1 5 Ltcl Vrage7 1(fr . add .4/e6e4.41/... , o40.5 - channel gh2d £ /w c,,,di-iu rev, - '.educed Z¢ 1p -acicied c nfe R EVIS IONS SCALE: 1 5 DATE : Q Z¢ of U APPROVED BY: \/_ Lennie HuSQ P E. Cc> f75(.Il*Ir)g 1Et73 /t2 eer Rlw Face 1''a p G h 4 iv-7a/ c /F p i`o 7 L P Cr f o /7 s ; i/ 7 Y.,.3 . c, NOTES I---/ t- p s a ,/ el lie 5c e to n e s /a rge t - - 4 r7 7 the A e s Z. cLISfur e r- mar ,, t7o p t-of c1 d - f / Sd� ✓,/ 5e �d�-d ¢-� c1: 5 c ✓er°, -f'Lie ° c { / S // d> e �eII w -Y�d $e d e d tr�a / e tr./�i r cr- e p/ , f9 J F c �s t- �o dc4,-- c7/-•- h /- fescue cry°- 7'h,e r to c"-f• 20 1b✓ / aS.. ew c+ cC P"�m rl�C. YCTc f 178 /‘-‘3-7,z. h /frcigei s ka1`l k%c= p / /ed )h&#.1 Veal /r7 47L The I ; c, f Ct hd Z o � p /3 a S� 1� a 1 b ' /a cre , f hc 5e� dr 9 £J; / b �� r d ur / th ?J1 �a 3' I7 C - r-r b1: flKe 1L such 15 c' /r7,e r/ce. Xcl /s i/- C: rn 5 c,t- -/ �c k / 'i.M, : t c /. +he b Ke. + s bra1/ b e /)7.57 q d a r-e -d i' 1-(le 141 e7 Yr L r 4 c 7i-e?"- a r- e 4 4 at ' 1 e • F a r V i - e s r r 5 I P / I 2 ? r✓- , -h m A e X / rbi f"c17 o a p /i7i6 c(f /aril s44 /! he d- / c4 //704,1- - 7 - ti e q1 - 4:7SS . 7 /6-4-, 4r7`' F i a e - i i / 19 4 ' / ° ., :.,, 1°). /-- C,► / v-> c>� . 4, the s e d bed s h o /l be hand --Ft r. pt-fa l- - pro r 0 ooci SQ . a ec .. .j. Q lack cc -/ 05 Inc? ' •1 ,n f SG/ch as Ytgc" or e6 uaI s hcrII b --he s a bet p r /ea + h p /a ce; e -r°- o - e e r ozion r t- r bletri ke* dart af ° q- Sf c � r 7 3 e Pd b e d a 5 .DAT E DRAINAGE PLAN LOT 2 q 5 LOCK 2 REVISED crr�d elP P / ,e er a e DRAWN BY /� �. VALLEY VJ5TA ESTATES DRAWING NUMBER 1/1 VVE- A 4 °P4 N. ! � '0 ici >c. V _ o Q M C Q -.:41.- Q.. to Gf-oUnc; i 111 .° U ` o • 0 • ` % 4 u► . c: �f7 �1 - 4- Uare.. _... Z g,, ` It. --ksr \ 1 +. _-, �0 •. o v 0 .0 0 0 Ill 'J L Po .- CN � i$ i 1 r___.i N M p _ W ci os `- rl . 24 X 36 PRINTED ON NO. 1000H CLEARPRINT s 33 I Z10r.D a090 2_ o3O 0 i0 G 4- T2 F l • 57`ct ,es a E':.5f,n4& r�yr YM ` P / k a/e n sfa it z �y c #Vf/ -¢ #b t -. 57 /6 1 t 38 t'o ex1S7' e7 #767e o 51 1d G. +37. '. Rerno>y e xt5f/hy 3a c m P f cirn ra :�k iaa# 37,6/ r` 1 TB M 2./ 17, 8'7 - 7"a of w ,r- ° ele . 4' b (5/ /4 'F 7 F /re h 9 ra"77 /ac °- ed /e' /1 _1 5 1fhel -/" / g; e a r - r- -7 Dr 1 .' '90 11-1 h %� 1 o r �3s,3 c, • PLAN Reco sfr-uc ' and shlpp 1i /e7< char-7,-7e/ f / / S fq 9 f / 6 a 7 .S7 9 f Sa - f - o f 17 517 c r: a / co r ra? /5 Q Pi d S /7, n 5 7 r1 // /: c k rt, rap c %/ a r717 e / ba /11 /7 / [� 7Lec tic st4 9 l `I ,# S fa 57``-01 send ear l /h /ef c h r/r1 e a ' , ' - - - 740 , 9ft - $- c- ayet -. 5fa / i n5) 100 C x 4 I t l4__ 5- fe1 CIF c 1, r S' .!2/-ar r. aye E.x ts7 G • M, 1Q - Po r de rasa DP • NM 4-a' 3G" iv1 E eo A L L / R 4 E 0 c yr ' x 6 - PROF LE BLOC $ • O � r S --s---A E - - T- E S L -4ts � C, �V r 0 -a- 3 J><. -1,71 a.- 1,8 eMps th-e le" 5ecf Ice' a /on 9 1 f ?re & pipe X- Se /or r 7 P/ c / d'/te 7 PIPE ‘.5 TA- /s/ -f38 • PPR_ VE 1J sy PR0PER7 ' 0\evNER G • D q E ` ` - 6 roU+id 11I'I Pia( , 0174" P /me rE Wks E HE PERMIT Er,+ APPROVED s( DEA LOP Lis °hc / . 0" ORS Ems e.- t$: .54c.c.,di o G. Pia n CANL X- SECTION ---/ r0 4f 5 / /7011 X . {/ &e? c.4- 4,' = e 544 9s1 f0 S* /O1 r cs a ; /it. �. \ 1 5 Ltcl Vrage7 1(fr . add .4/e6e4.41/... , o40.5 - channel gh2d £ /w c,,,di-iu rev, - '.educed Z¢ 1p -acicied c nfe R EVIS IONS SCALE: 1 5 DATE : Q Z¢ of U APPROVED BY: \/_ Lennie HuSQ P E. Cc> f75(.Il*Ir)g 1Et73 /t2 eer Rlw Face 1''a p G h 4 iv-7a/ c /F p i`o 7 L P Cr f o /7 s ; i/ 7 Y.,.3 . c, NOTES I---/ t- p s a ,/ el lie 5c e to n e s /a rge t - - 4 r7 7 the A e s Z. cLISfur e r- mar ,, t7o p t-of c1 d - f / Sd� ✓,/ 5e �d�-d ¢-� c1: 5 c ✓er°, -f'Lie ° c { / S // d> e �eII w -Y�d $e d e d tr�a / e tr./�i r cr- e p/ , f9 J F c �s t- �o dc4,-- c7/-•- h /- fescue cry°- 7'h,e r to c"-f• 20 1b✓ / aS.. ew c+ cC P"�m rl�C. YCTc f 178 /‘-‘3-7,z. h /frcigei s ka1`l k%c= p / /ed )h&#.1 Veal /r7 47L The I ; c, f Ct hd Z o � p /3 a S� 1� a 1 b ' /a cre , f hc 5e� dr 9 £J; / b �� r d ur / th ?J1 �a 3' I7 C - r-r b1: flKe 1L such 15 c' /r7,e r/ce. Xcl /s i/- C: rn 5 c,t- -/ �c k / 'i.M, : t c /. +he b Ke. + s bra1/ b e /)7.57 q d a r-e -d i' 1-(le 141 e7 Yr L r 4 c 7i-e?"- a r- e 4 4 at ' 1 e • F a r V i - e s r r 5 I P / I 2 ? r✓- , -h m A e X / rbi f"c17 o a p /i7i6 c(f /aril s44 /! he d- / c4 //704,1- - 7 - ti e q1 - 4:7SS . 7 /6-4-, 4r7`' F i a e - i i / 19 4 ' / ° ., :.,, 1°). /-- C,► / v-> c>� . 4, the s e d bed s h o /l be hand --Ft r. pt-fa l- - pro r 0 ooci SQ . a ec .. .j. Q lack cc -/ 05 Inc? ' •1 ,n f SG/ch as Ytgc" or e6 uaI s hcrII b --he s a bet p r /ea + h p /a ce; e -r°- o - e e r ozion r t- r bletri ke* dart af ° q- Sf c � r 7 3 e Pd b e d a 5 .DAT E DRAINAGE PLAN LOT 2 q 5 LOCK 2 REVISED crr�d elP P / ,e er a e DRAWN BY /� �. VALLEY VJ5TA ESTATES DRAWING NUMBER 1/1 VVE- 20 Cot 2060 2'058 2056 20 54 20 H-1 ao 5P , -.10 .y 2050 204 2046 2044 - 2042 2o4Ca .1 1 2052 - _ Zoa Z. Tom •• . 40'w IGC 1 Tvv ■• 2.051,'10 STORM RETENTION POND PLAN HYDRAULIC PROFILE STORM RETENTION POND- SECTION Drrc1.- 4 ir.av,tL, , DITCF Cot' -Jry STAr -1owr p , z4" x ZG' c 2060 2050 2048 2044 2, 1. 2 056 2.0 S 2054 - pp OF B.E RM T SEE NOTE 8 S8-c -; c4) / --A 1)(21V. 24"DIA. CMP OVERFLOW PIPE ST 44.1."." METAL COVER 24 Di'- :t OUTLET P. 24 " DIA.' CMP OUT.E? PIPE CONTROL ORIFICE 14 "OIAA. SEE N07 pk< < WATERTICr1)T CLE4NOUT W/ 8 CGACIO ' •LI:)E w/ CI AIN PLJLL ,1 '\+l E'I' Pt PE SEE n1OTES 6 4 7 v1 (2:r RC, ''. A 4 A 03 M1>rfitt Ott NE WA 9 r. 32 DITCH Q(cfs) * * * * *****'k ## # #** ##* # .Fill material shall be well - graded, free of organic matter and shall have a maximum particle size of 4- inches in diameter. Construction shall be in accordance with Comp action Method "C ", Section 13 -3 of APWA STANDARD SPC MfN1CTP P LtC.;ON, . 'fidr d ail dtu �} cr WORKS este wheatgrass. Rf r mall be Land- placed at cult .oufl STRUCTION on all ditch channels on as per sect.iq s 8-= 15.3(3). and 9 -13.2 of the S'AT y r F OF "WASHINGTON latest STANDARD editi SP ;r D BRIDGE COTRUON, latest edition. 4. Al SP metal parts and surfaces in :the Flow Restrictor. structure shall be made` of CIFIC corrosi I resi FOR stant ROAI mate ANrial RID `or galvanized CTI steel. All welds shall be p otected from corrosion and leakage. ` All welds shall conform to W.S.H.S. 9- 06 --54 STATE OF WASHINGTON STANDARD; SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, latest edition. All welds shall be painted with rust inhibtor paint , "GALVICON" or approved equivalent. 5.. Provide a steel ladder to the, bottom of the Flow Restrictor structure. Permenantly; fix to the wall of the 6-feet diameter C.M.P. with bolted angle iron bracket at the ; top of the structure 6. Weld a 30 -inch diameter C.M P. to the inside of the 6-feet diameter C.M.P. to serve ;. as an overflow and to contain the control orifice. Welds.. shall be 2 - inches long with a minimum cross section of 1/4-inch using 6011. rod or b 7.,,Weld.1 /4�i steel plate with a 14-inch diameter control orifice Lo the lottom'of the 30 -inch C.M.P. overflow structure at the elevation. shownin the drawing;, on' this sheet. 8.' Th e: base for the Flow Restrictor structure shall be, an 8 -feet square . concrete pad, 8-,inches thick. The 6-feet 'diameter C'M.P. shall be embedded 4- inches into the base. 9.., The = °Cover for the flow restrictor shal be 6' -6" diameter 1/4 -inch checkere steel plate'. The hatch shall be of the same material with an o of 2- feet by 2- feet`;with an, approved locking device. # # # x #if # ## ##s"# # # #31 ** #*:f*'•c # # # # # # # # #o`EiE# E # # #** 'c**** 3c# #a`.' #* *if ### A 11.1 B 11.1 c 0.5 D 7.4 E 7.4 F 8.7 G " 8.7 H 16.4 I 16.4 J "` 17.0 1 X7.7 2 24.2 3 " 30.0 4 31.6 5 20.0 LENGTH TOM ELEV. DROP SLOPE UPPER LOWER 332°043100005:'',, 2058. 2051.20 6.80' 0.0227 2050. BOT 40 2047.50 2 .90' d.a 't 33 5 204.9.40 2049.00 0.40' 0.0800 20. 2057.30 19.70' 0.0985 2055.10 2052..62 2.40' 0.0620 i:cz. 73 2058.00` 44 . 5n°°°00' 41553 40' 2055.60 2055.20 0.40'' .0100 150'. 2083.80 ' 2068.06 15.74' .1049 75' 2067.26 2064.00 3.26' 0435 35' 2062 40 2061.40 1.00' .`0286 405' 2061.40 2055.20 6.20' 0153 205' 2055.20 2052.62 2.58' 0.0126 287' 2052.62 2049.00 3.62' 0.0126 177' 2049.00 2047.50 1.50' .0085 256' 2046.00 2043.90 2.1 0 .0082 ' DEVELOPER APPROVAL: Date: -- NaWw;i5WX - 1.4 41 12/31/84 LDK ,` VALLEY VISTA ESTATES DITCH SCHEDULE # # # # # * # # # # # * # # # # * ## # # # # # ## GENERAL NOTES I.l t wc :, . oc) t� �fvq, tl S4I,Q11 t ' 910. 110 k.( g S9 ` 00 2 N 83to, 43 'S �! So`7,Sb APPROVED BY 14.,,4..1ws(1 * * *: * *** * * ## ' * * *: * # # # # #* r 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2,0 ' ` 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.5 3.0 2.5 3.0 2.5 3.5 2.5 4.0 2.5 4.0 3.0 3.0 2.5 E 91c),5 E ... , %T E 88o tc8 • ac1,064 E 75e, 7.174 E t64 ,r.oa apt 3t3E5c ;: tt t l ) Pbtj oar ,., 4 +29 (pr) F Lo4a1 R 0 Z...1 , TVZ P r� t;arr A ITtG?) bVee.f - - DRAWN BY REVISED 12.13 04- DRAWING UMBER i l 83 tZ S%T 4 cP MADE IN 1.1.111.411: ALBANENE ® 10.5455 ARCHITECTS' STANDARD FORM SEW 24 36 PRINTED ON NO. 1000H OLEAHPRINT 10 0 , ez Ai 9 iv) d - aoeo $ /1 2. <7--' C frip ".0" 5 lot 1 exts74"i7y i-lell7e.',/4 5 tio a. +37,4/. "Rerno&-e •e....xt,5? " lvf frcirn f-1 37,‘/ 5I1,L/ t1 "FeCC tici Sh4A,P //j/e4 ".7 /7 00 o / -5 • 6o 7 r o .5 "-7 I / /-7-7 / 5- a /7 77",) <1 7 / 1 / 11 4/ 71- 7e..1 lc " /-,c, .7`e c. /45 si`a t o 57 5 e /n e-7 c- 17 /7/7 1=9 - 7 4 cr / , S x " ° 'N. / "Cn_ ›.< ••• ■S' ij E 3c. A- L E / 5 14i , 5 ec. I/1 a tong CJ7d "-) 7e/ & prP - =-2.111= - 1 Setzd 7 g t- C45 Cok.et PATE DATE: NOT ES t--/er-op h 1"/ e/- I.._ t 71 le Huse) F. E. r7 s /*Ins C7 3 112e.4 Maw ING NUMBER 0 9 -, C5" . 6) o -3 - - Zs: :."'- C \ il.k") ._ Grot"n8 /...._ "r/.e, r .. Q - til -• ...... Q _ Iti ,, q) Pd) -4 - -- 0 -, -- -(---' - , .).S 14 4 0 k• , 1 .. 'A- \i'.■ . t , t-- ,, c‘ • i ti) N 00 -.. ' -- .. 47, ' e/ - --.,. J ‘ , -‘.. (13 C , •-... 1.... ..ir.../, C i v • -, ,., 0 I LI - '4.. I_ III CO --... (\f -,•• ,, . 1 •C 1- .. 2 t) i'l 1%-i , '1, . o,f , ,... 24 36 PRINTED ON NO. 1000H OLEAHPRINT 10 0 , ez Ai 9 iv) d - aoeo $ /1 2. <7--' C frip ".0" 5 lot 1 exts74"i7y i-lell7e.',/4 5 tio a. +37,4/. "Rerno&-e •e....xt,5? " lvf frcirn f-1 37,‘/ 5I1,L/ t1 "FeCC tici Sh4A,P //j/e4 ".7 /7 00 o / -5 • 6o 7 r o .5 "-7 I / /-7-7 / 5- a /7 77",) <1 7 / 1 / 11 4/ 71- 7e..1 lc " /-,c, .7`e c. /45 si`a t o 57 5 e /n e-7 c- 17 /7/7 1=9 - 7 4 cr / , S x " ° 'N. / "Cn_ ›.< ••• ■S' ij E 3c. A- L E / 5 14i , 5 ec. I/1 a tong CJ7d "-) 7e/ & prP - =-2.111= - 1 Setzd 7 g t- C45 Cok.et PATE DATE: NOT ES t--/er-op h 1"/ e/- I.._ t 71 le Huse) F. E. r7 s /*Ins C7 3 112e.4 Maw ING NUMBER PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 9 SECTION 4, T.24E.. R.44E.. W.M. AMENDED DRAINAGE EASEMENT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 2, VALLEY YISTA ESTATES. SCALc.. \"- 50 SuRv .YoTS C .R Tt IGAT1O 11-I 15 M I? Co R�. C'V L'( RE.? R E. S €. NTS SuRVE.Y MADE. t3 M C. AT rN RE-2 u Es r OF RA.L.PH CR LATH RI' _ 19 9 ELBORWS LAND SURVEYING, INC. P.S. E. 7011 SECOND AVE. SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99212 (509) 926 -5959 manhole ..e.:11,a*/01-15 n t, PM= 2,434.ao 20 //C;' / a49861 256.0 a 268/./7 2076.00 99.34 2o7P.2.0 IIIIIVD;OttN0.100H -CLEARPRI . - rvEwrs-e_ci- p761 dM V e-g,e_I dia ome geacf,e,e Ely/ (-0/41/-1, rev. ge_ciCied 24 CM/el Cahe 17Avie 1 EV C) (N./ DAT"a" /Ak !NAGE F'1._ A N L 0 T SLOC:K DRAWN BY '2) 1 REV IS ED ecorls thi'.e.-f ?"--- 72 s 7 q+ C FSffi . ra n 7 irot-rs reld >0+ -I 6 I I' OcK r I fl af *0 Ch a I I vide ' h 4 P1 -1-1 n . r, ..,...9. 9:.,....,.,,i,_.4.1, , , 1, ioo . , , -..-4 - - la I .- '' ' ...„,,, 1.-- . 6.4) . ., . . , i: : ' , . .L - ' . ' 1 • ',.. ,, . '''''§ - -'.-: --. -hi'', : ,‘ 102 fitti cy .• ..i. ,• - • .-- :--- ..• •-.z, os=tz • :::: .'- ' ' • .: t-13• '''' NA ----k/) ' 1 . . ' _., i , ., •-t.,, t ._ , i F t ..,, , ... .....(:) ,u. '.4,1..Z. -.: .: .., ', - '''. i,,i-Li.•.: x.- : z ' '' p6,--- . , ' 6 ' - .. ' 1 '4) . I. l',:-P: ' ' ' -. ' .., -. , , ,i, ,-,.. ,,.,. . ,.------ , . . ...,...,.._ ..,:., :. .,,,..,,....„.,, ., ... .,.„..... ..,,,, ..... . , . ,..,„,4 , i 03 20 7c), .I. ' ,. ' . . ,11-1 .i„... • -: -' : -..„,. ilt .g, q..... . . ..,,....., - 206,..., , ,,. ii„....a.... 7.../...-- Grotdild tle- Al P1s0VF ty srr4 476 , Monhd ire ha f - <Xs' Wail / reip fc - ^z 1 € 1 . 4 d . /1 /11/e7 - 4c714frief cc:1re l fr guel .. .? — evq A ale-- .sw r0 c,,, pi of (i - I 4 .5 rtz. Li ii- - 7.--C,) p/ 47c ..,e;. ,,-. oi/ef 1 - T ro(fide cot rt .,› r 4 11:3 I e en I 1 a 42 c MP* Forc ct pou Q.! 1 ,7 piace, / T /Q 0 /7 lie PF3(7)Pa"R1Y o A Fr r3te z),4-rF-- D A T E /, d// to:/::- s ha ye. oe!F i eg geie-- 2. au 1 Corced c a s 7 'I- pia e 60 shall e fe r." N N N 0) • 0 E.xisTIr-14 14( I . A51� To ¶3s_ AW D o 'J 1 SAC 4-, T241\1 ,R4- 4f,W,M.. ii Po NI 05..R 05 A, DRA\/ _... .. �• i- 1 SurR\/ -E`(0 S CE- RT%FICATIO 'T M ? Co NZ .CTl.'t RE.?RS..5€:N11$ SURVE. -Y MP,17 ,\( M A h I Re. u T' OF Rc JuL ( 1990. PRINTED` ON NO 100011 CLEARPRINT 2 100 x 090 Q C/1 f F/re I ra-y /acc 7 /0IZ9 5e, tr 1 -' . � i ce" r�,aj c e. aS s. ,, 'N NL/ c gHhei ftpd77 SA1 /01 * 1'® > ' 3. e x is 9 trl P a P haf a�f ..5 ., L,�, t0 5 16 z. -1 7.4 /. lie rnov-e e. x(5 / flj 3 41 " %Mi P Fro/77 141 an/70k �� so , o �k $ /e24 37,x/ ! tar , r 1 / F e c o r s i7-4/ c. f- a tad Shope /n/e7 Ch Q r7 7 e 1 A/-6'77 . /-a `1 'r/ '46o 4.0 5tQ qq 1L80 71-0 71`t"G1 n St i,p /7 t4'M fie t- /)-. ai7d . 'rtearat4 i /757'4 // /,-esci Ghr -7rJn ! bat ,t ,o 7' e : 7 /7 s"t4 c / ` , ' " S 5 eJ earth /n/e7 :harrnel 64nk5 fa ,9/-7 c t e r X Is'f / 11 01` two t - de rasa Di-1 tre �.! 35 ° 4 - Z' 3G"W 100 10/ Io . 5A-L E 2 -" CA Sec-7 :/7 P //'e / H/e �1I' / fit . °k 1,t ASty 0pr1 �;ts7a �� OWItt Vtor N .O .t l l r f r-o p: s h r // 1147 die T f Gr' ? i'c?•° f. /'T C*e ' q tot cf7'/ remits /rl rtr-Sf Fi r-e 9efrd r $1 / 1 2..q.-' c Ivl r' f rd rr, sit rot t...38 z`° '° >,.. R ex isrirtty tr Pt c+te of ` • - �.t- 5 1 ! S a. + 3 7. 6 / . 'Re rn o t.re ` \. exts1 3a 'c , p frci.rn `1- ian � Qt 574 Its -tit 37.‘f 6 6If tac 7 Drr//e Recr� }� sfruct at20' sh4p,. /4/e4 eke? n /7Gf At-6/77 JS7''4 9 f 6G fo Si'-a n s 7 a !W y!/ P2; /;- 47 t7c/ 3/7740 2 /f- n S7 4 rt,prop ch4r7t / ba /"} K p,' c 7`ec 7 Sf4 ! 1` * 5, 5- ed e4Yfh /e' C-41 /7/7 h4f7K5' 7 t 5" BLOC �y 6 -x /lU � x , �r t >r a rx o rQ � •S` C {� ScA L E / 1! = 50 5ec fr' a /O'19 l'I�r7r2e/ (S p ipe s TA- / *, - 3 6 ii!°. DEVE _OP E Se< DATE R€duc „. z¢aciwp �r� ckunl e REVISION RAW ING-N U MB 2.117,617 -1„4/0 F .6 a /7 d i s c -/r id e 7r 1/ !ISM it 2.4-" C ivIP f tcr s /of 1-31 feel > � x ts,L 1 )14 a it hole ,4 9 . Sta :: to Z; +3 7:4 /. Fierno.vc :.. eXt,574ri79 a c:. P -:.�►� a�s6�a /e 474 s Reco ri sft=uc7 or?d Shype :if /e • Ch:4 r>i7e /: ., ft-a m ro n i`31. -o 7 r7.si fi at? '5tha6.7'4/P hgr3 jara `� t� cat P% e t . /ef; ho 7'7 e 44 v 9rd s, cover. Zloo:� Grp u r d l.tra' 5 r E Sr AT :E 3 5G /rL- E J „ _ 5 - 0 3' non. '7' 52c +141/7 c?./ 5 eye 'II ;►lt a CMP Ground d 1 1 t _ ► _, t APPROVED By DE.VE D ATE ®� � froIiide de n /4 Provide c o hcre fe f see rings a 5 hegu trref o plac g t/iid /ix7e.. Cd /h -plg GahGrc. e SCALE: DATE: E'_as7 or Ft-6-;e: - 'ea 24 X 38 - PRINTED ON NO. 1000H:CLEARPRINT • 2100 2O SEC `- _7_ 24. E o t ,, ` N� �dr 5 1.- C 1vhev ..%. ._: - f #-b rra s14 i a 1 1 7 . > is 7`' l f7 r ;' 7 ell /7 a f; o f � . Sfa 10?-÷37,61. Ra'mo& -e xeS74.ir7 34. M, P frcrrr n- iah hale > V/4 4# fe,z4 37, f _s 4. N' 7s . Fec Q f sfrr..1c t and .Shope /n/e71 C/ (7,1e/ ft--6t77 .5f-a g'46o fa S fq /9q +'80 '7O *t—c2 h $I l - / a n nsfcr // 1-acK rtP/-4p G Li4 /7 ra e .f p f-c� , :i t7 4 9 9 f'; &O *o ' . 5 5 d ea A in /ef c. b4`7 KS 7 cs t 7 £.5 c;: ci J-' - ., +' -.85 T2. 3 4 { c , E.k'is ` in a-18" Cr 5c.A 1 , 1 _ Sc) Se '7 i �Gt 4-" C(wp 17 e/ Pia( r- (— b Grc� Li pro i e c o art) 4/,1 F ,' 1) Is it [ REVISED R 4 -E FD ;.1.1 /4" PIPE RP's: TK. IN PPOLE S.W. 58.6 TK. IN P.POCE N.E.265 PK. -IN CURB S.E. 82 M O . CD *". to a d' W m 3 Z J 0 - 0 ` I-01c Nr w 4% 0 3m Z END OF PROJECT STA. 17+65. o- P0.8. W. 1/4 CORNER FD. AXLE RPs :' TK. 14" PINE N.W. 35: TX. 10" PINE W. 10. TK. 24"PINE S.E. 39. 5 P= 290 M.2290. : 290. LOT 5, BLOCK 2 I WIDE STRIP SCALE. I' 100' CURVE DATA TABLE 2677.77' N.89° 12'57 "E. - 1383. 6 1 9 i/ P. : 136° 14=405 _ 14 = 135. M. 3444 SOUTH LINE OF MYRON ESTATES No. 8 224. S.83 ° 38'57" E. CURVE ARC CURVE NUMBER DELTA RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT NUMBER DELTA RADIUS 1 14 °45'45" 440.00 113.37 57.00 19 79 ° 49'23" 20.00 2 1'1'09'30" 410.00 122.78 61.85 20 109°09'21" 20.00 3 17 °09'30" 380.0o 113.80 57.33 21 54 °32'48" 125:00 4 26 °02'31" 380.0o 172.72 - 87.88 22 70 °27'33" 150.0o 5 26 °02'31" 410.00 186.35 • 94.81 23 63 °31'32" 175.00 6 26 0 02'31" 440.00 199.99 101.75 24 52 °2 175.00 7 19 440.00 149.75 75.61 25 11°07'53" 175.00 8 o6 °32'31" 440.00 50.24 25.15 26 17 °19'04" 275.00 9 09 °30'21" 440.00 73.00 36.58 27 17 °19'04" 300.00 10 17'34'46" 440.00 135.00 68.04 28 17 °19'04" 325.00 11 17°34'46" 440.00 135.00 68.04 29 11 °29'09" 305.00 12 50 °09'44" 380.0o 332.69 177.85 3o 25 °04'07" 305.00 13 50 °09'44" 410.00 358.95 191.89 31 36 °33'16" 305.00 14 50 °09'44" 440.0o 385.22 205.93 32 36 °33'16" 330.00 �5 05°29'51" .440.00 . 42.22 21.13. .33 36 °33'16" 355.00 16 08 °28'03" 440.00 65.03 32.57 17 08 °43'28" 410.00 62.43 31.28 18 09°01'19" 380.00 59.84 • 29.98 "F. iLEG Oft JON i i 12 51 N4 4. 8" WILLIAM "okxHUE SPOKANE COUNTY.'WASH. q('PUTY " ARC LENGTH 27.86 38.10 119.00 `184.46 194.03 160 34.00 83.12 90.68 98.23 61.14 133. 194.59 210. 54 226.49 98. a 42 64 1 350 0' _'- 297 30 I C 0.68 Ac. 32. 7 43831 %4, 1.01 Ac. 0 • 4. 0 1O 6 1 ` 140 66651 I. r 5'PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TYPICAL) 13345' S. . -224. _ TANGENT 16.73 28.12. 64.44 105.93 108.35 86.10 17.05 41.88 45.69 49.49 30.67 67.81 100.74 108.99 117.25 W.2/4 t N.1/4 CORNER FD. 3/4" PIPE RR's: CURB S.W. 38. PK. IN cu PK. IN CURD S.E. 381 PK. IN EDGE 'ASPHALT. N.15." WELBORN'S LAND SURVEYING E. 7011 SECOND AVE. ;SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99212 (509) 926 -5959 LEGEND Found 4 Rebar, Except Where' Noted Set No.4 Rebar and Cap • Field ' Measurement Plot Measurement • Radial Bearing = Curve Data Number • 15' Drainage. Easement C. I/4 CORNER �. FO. AXLE R.P's: TK. 8" PINE N.W. 219 TK. 8" PINE S.W. " 26 ? TK. 10 PINE S. -7• 71 DEDICATI and . presents that Ralph D. . Guthrie . Know_ ye men b these re e p Y Y P Gertrude 0. Guthrie husband and wife and Commerce Mortgage, a Washington Corporation, and Valley Vista Convalescent Center, a Washington Corporation, have caused to be platted s into Lots, Blocks, and streets a s shown on this map and be- g P in more particularly described as follows: ent Lot `_ A onion of Land in Government 9, Se:t.on 4, T24N, 9 R E, W.M., p 44 W.M. Spokane County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Government lot 9; thence N00 °40'12 "W along the West line of said Section 4, a distance of 433.08 feet to the True Point of beginning for this description. Thence continuing N00 °40'12 "W a distance 217.91 feet to a point of a Non- Tangent curve having a Radial Bearing S4 °10'39 "E; thence along a curve to the right (having a delta 8 ° 28'03" and a radius of 440.00 feet) 65.03 feet; thence S85 ° 42'36 "E - 545.76 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta of 50 °09'44." and a radius 380.00 feet) 332..69 feet; thence N44 °07'40 "E a distance 365.66 feet to a point of a curve; thence along a curve to the left (having a delta 26 ° 02'31" and a radius 380.00 feet) 172.72•feet; thence N18 °05'09 "E - 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a delta 14 °45'45" and a radius 440.00 feet) 113.37 feet to a Non - Tangent point - on the curve. Said point having a Radial'Bearing SS7 °09'06 "E; thence N89 °12'57 "E 73.72 feet; thence S35°14'39 "W - 24.97 feet to a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta 17 °09'30" and a radius 380.00 feet) 113.80 feet; thence S18 °05'09 "W - 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a delta of 19'30'00 " a radius 440.00 feet) 149.75 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve having; a Radial Bearing N52 ° 24' 51 "W; thene #,S45 ° 52'20 "E - 199.86 feet; thence S44'=07'40 "W - 356.00 feet; thence S47°09'45"W a distance 165.22 feet; thence S62c25' 24" W a distance 139.16 feet; thence S23 °46'32 "E - 287.22 feet; thence S01 °21'03 "W - 50.00 feet; thence N88 ° 38'57 "W - 224.77 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a delta 36 °33'16" and a radius 355. feet) 226.49 feet; thence N52 ° 05'41 "W - 149.10 feet; thence S37 °54'19 "W - 170.00 feet; thence N52'05'41 "W - 149.09 feet; thence N48 °15'43 "W - 308.08 feet to the point of beginning. They do hereby dedicate for Public Use forever, the right -of way for all roads and Public Utilities as shown on the face of this Plat. For ourselves, our heirs and assigns, we do hereby enter into a covenant with the County of Spokane and do agree as follows: No more than one dwelling unit be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. A public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited within this plat. The owners of Lots 1,3,4,5,6,7, and 9, of Block 1, and Lots 2, and 3 of Block, 2, shall be held responsible for obstructing all artifically collecting or discharging the natural or manmade drainage flow across or adjacent to their property. The property owner or his representative shall inform each suceeding purchaser of all drainage easements on the property and his responsibility for maintaining drainage facilities within said.easements. Spokane County does not accept -the responsibility of maintaining the drainage courses on private lots within drainage easements or flood plain areas nor the responsibility for any drainage,whatsoever,.including but not•limited to inverse condemination to any properties due to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage cour ses in drainage easements on private property. . State of Washington County of Spokane ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State of Washington)S5 County of Spokane ) On this 2 day of ^ emu_' appeared Ralph D. Guthrie and wife, . that execute the with No ry Public Residing aft Notary •ubl , tat- Of Wash gto: Residin u. On This 1 say Of , 1984, Before me erson- ally appeared e� Tl, ..r known to me to be� the t of b,ltd cL V i sDd vidww.s.a.' (: . 3 h execute the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that ht executes the same as its free a voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes here in mentioned and hereon shown in witness whereof I have here- unto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day .and year first above written. in and foregoing instrument and acknow- ledge to me the same as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes herein mention and hereon shown in witness whereof I have here unto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. ON THIS DAY OF , 1984, BEFORE ME PERSON- ALLY. ¢PPEARED /1vc.(4- e. H Iei KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE 14i-e_/"."4.44A.4 ps u..t..t OF C s M at e c 6 M•43 e o Nt P fW y THAT EXECUTE THE WITHIN AND FOREGOING INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT , EXECUTES THE SAME AS ITS FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES HERE IN MENTIONED AND HEREON SHOWN IN WITNESS WHEREOF I HAVE HERE - UNTO SET MY HAND AND AFFIXED MY OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. DEDICA I. Q ON .0 NT NUE . Subject 'to specific application .a roval' an i ssuance dividual on -site sewa8 e sstem c;?# ur' 'by the Health Officer, each lot i authorized. the use ;c x � t :: g y Y . The owner, his heirs and successors shall join ' and': artier ate in any petition or resolution which purpose is:the formation-of 0 a utility'local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW"' Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, hie 'heirs ..and . successors ` `shall further agree. not to oppose or protest any legal asse ments for. any - utility local improvement distric : t °(ULID)' establish ed pursuant to RCW-Chapter 36.94, as amended. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection futures area -wide collection systems. Lot 5, block 2, and lot 4, block 2, are 1 foot strips;and` are hereby dedicated to Spokane County as general; county. property to be dedicated for roadway purposes at such tine as roads are extended as full width public right -of -ways and /or adjacent ' lands are platted. Valley Vista Convalescent : Center By President: .e745 'ByiPresident: Ralph;. D. Guthrie Gertrude 0. Guthrie SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR ' UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLATTING ORDINANCE. Date Eugene H. Welborn L.S. No. 15043 DIRECTOR OF COUNTY UTILITIES EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS -EDT DAY OF COUNTY ENGINEER EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED AND ACCEPTED OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, THIS COUNTY HEALTH EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS /0 DAY OF 4 Health Officer /4"..177r " 'f • • �F W A y •:. H 150 43 • � • C ANp . 'Ch rman, AL Count Commissioners PLANNING DEPARTMEDIRECTOR EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS f NTf DAY OF ton tt COUNTY T E ' Treasure of Spokane County. Washington ' do he by certify t at all taxes which have been levied and 0 become chargeable against the land shown within this map' and described in the dedication of this date, have been fully paid, satisfied, and discharged. this t r ( day of . 1985. County As::' 7 TtI ---04 eir ¢! . N . 9 o5iv SFS Z z � 330 +864 , 819 8785 43'7.42' % N, SV 3 N ' ^ 8ss. s4' r ' 0: \r lq o �' w TO b- ejt 04 Ns- itso,o‘• . 20 oe' / U - 0 `R.?$68 N 4, \ / a X . m t: x . 1 4. r 6 , in x FF1 C1AL '`PLAT .co-1--r_ ENsit4t.ER - ,SPOKA1 I3Y.' -� LOT . .:0 71% See N.5834 • • .; 1 x • 7'? N , DE -r E IN LET `•J/ TAL_ 2ATE TYPE Z ELZVATiopJ zo4S, .16 .807 gip_ ? ;7 �„ �� _ ogi 4 ,- O N G 7L tris'o9' 304 / Ss tif B M' E/ 2c 54 ,x /V fi`4 .O7' 7 / r 0 ix■rnST 114c S TILIE# t n n 3 -re 24 "x ao Cti;P I r( ZO5IItC s =o•oi • • p re'40+■ ZeC T 11 sy Oc 722' I t)E' TM � Z Co►.!(,R ET,= i ►JL>ET w/ k4 1=r46./.-4€ A►-J GrZATE, r•iFEL Gn� c-L..'`Z If c 3 CJ-4 P - ,.,. , 2- act 5 =o .are 2 $Tp. G Coarra 2.0$1. 40 7'40 (r W 1417.1221111 • z - 7 31 to 4% t r u s .�. r""" - 5o `�� - } . SCI A/ �` w Az leo' arm + �.� - .4d ' ?l3E - 140• R_ as - 2.4. Z t � A � °`• s� - - 39 _ P za , -45,2. g-45,2. 1°° c 3a, S , � 3 2 37, ib A. 4-.2.1 • r I4 98 (4 NOTE DO NOT PEI2FOt2M ANY CONSTt:ZUG -'10N ON RETEN"V1O• POND UNTIL MOTIF 1 Et) I:31C T 4E ENG— INFER T 11S • 3 j S' 45.8 r A go-,r,, Y t--.40 D i Sr>is S 4+oc" µ .0 1..4 Ret.oc - r 5� > 2.rr� �► ,& 4-Z •ro D I_ yn ►� Or.► T1•E 6X1STIuG STREAM CmA1-NEL 114AL.i. lie.oCPTCC:t A5 4 3110w/J 014 71..e. Da Q.1 l 3 A-T' I. 2 - SLoc: cIg' 00 87. PT r- 4v.ro SNAIL Aa> 1'eLY ORAIN To "Ti4E Ek1,m C. TIR .E.A A o..mer a 4.5 51-44=M1.1 o t.r /14E. Ply 15 . ThE. viaLocATIED 3L1t4M4 Ct.lAt,l heEL 54444. 4.4A4E A esce!t'tM w I om a Th$14J 4.' . A •.a.., I hate%Z look DITCH S�off.•S t� C 440'-' . Tr+p -I 3•.1 +�.� 13E RtPI�APF_c, 1b..) A< ?i WrT N I46TES 3 o.s vi-rr .3 8"- ITCH "a• C c z ar ce1o..+ wr+1c L 4 7- , 54-4 4- /7 6'0 L e/7 .r// /o/ s •g /ek 20 G3 09 a..✓ 3/(2164 REvI3 124* lac} Rw• I t i l f a15 Rev. t-2- R� ,r. Z -treys ( am••.) _ A Date Revision Drawn By: Date Designed By: Checked By: HORIZONTAL VERTICAL SCALE OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENG,. EER N. 811 Jefferson St. Spokane Wa. 99260 456- 3600 Appro { COUNTY ENGINEER ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 418 • fp L . , 4 ' / .";.. Vt . i T , . , i 1 r I , ' - ' ; ; • . .• ME • A _ • ENEE ______.„ P. 4 ,■ _ _ _ ..._ __ L. _ __ . . ; I I I ' i 1 - , lin A,. g r ILLLI MIME r , _ F loymma _________ 20 . 0 - ., ., .• 1 WI. i OM= 44‘..., ` i { a r ____ _ ,r...... L . _ mons MOM I , I —4.-1 • 6$;. ' I 44 ti 'rt.' I-4 11 FM __ i , l __,_ . H I ; ' be , I 1 ....., ..- .... . t u , 1 I 1 I , _ / 1 0 1 lip /iris 0 ZI 2 $I 6 1 4 ; 111 • — _ T _.. I t it- El WWI v I e 1.1111111111111 � - -- . —Y-- , f . - , - - �- - 1 11/4 I I 1 i ` • / ' . 4-4- --..-. - CV') 1 1 _ __. S ' • ...- • " 1 - PI _r MI ' . + HI 'Ti I ; li • • I- , ' I . k . , ; ; — • N `, — ( I 1 I I IL' 4); , - I } 'r , u • �. V• } Pti + �l }� 1 j 1111 v r ! 1 WIle, ` i r . . (1) 1 1) ,3 ,, , T . ,.. j KM IIMI I - _ , 1 ,,d• 01 — 4 r . Pa 7 'tts r /1 r --- 1, I II . I , i 1 • , 1 ; I i 1 i 1 , ._. . 1 . _ _ , ja 4 a OF,I • 4 I i f . . � I f 1 1 • 1 , yip 1 - - - , a — <- r T • . C4Ii7.44 .N.4 7'? N , DE -r E IN LET `•J/ TAL_ 2ATE TYPE Z ELZVATiopJ zo4S, .16 .807 gip_ ? ;7 �„ �� _ ogi 4 ,- O N G 7L tris'o9' 304 / Ss tif B M' E/ 2c 54 ,x /V fi`4 .O7' 7 / r 0 ix■rnST 114c S TILIE# t n n 3 -re 24 "x ao Cti;P I r( ZO5IItC s =o•oi • • p re'40+■ ZeC T 11 sy Oc 722' I t)E' TM � Z Co►.!(,R ET,= i ►JL>ET w/ k4 1=r46./.-4€ A►-J GrZATE, r•iFEL Gn� c-L..'`Z If c 3 CJ-4 P - ,.,. , 2- act 5 =o .are 2 $Tp. G Coarra 2.0$1. 40 7'40 (r W 1417.1221111 • z - 7 31 to 4% t r u s .�. r""" - 5o `�� - } . SCI A/ �` w Az leo' arm + �.� - .4d ' ?l3E - 140• R_ as - 2.4. Z t � A � °`• s� - - 39 _ P za , -45,2. g-45,2. 1°° c 3a, S , � 3 2 37, ib A. 4-.2.1 • r I4 98 (4 NOTE DO NOT PEI2FOt2M ANY CONSTt:ZUG -'10N ON RETEN"V1O• POND UNTIL MOTIF 1 Et) I:31C T 4E ENG— INFER T 11S • 3 j S' 45.8 r A go-,r,, Y t--.40 D i Sr>is S 4+oc" µ .0 1..4 Ret.oc - r 5� > 2.rr� �► ,& 4-Z •ro D I_ yn ►� Or.► T1•E 6X1STIuG STREAM CmA1-NEL 114AL.i. lie.oCPTCC:t A5 4 3110w/J 014 71..e. Da Q.1 l 3 A-T' I. 2 - SLoc: cIg' 00 87. PT r- 4v.ro SNAIL Aa> 1'eLY ORAIN To "Ti4E Ek1,m C. TIR .E.A A o..mer a 4.5 51-44=M1.1 o t.r /14E. Ply 15 . ThE. viaLocATIED 3L1t4M4 Ct.lAt,l heEL 54444. 4.4A4E A esce!t'tM w I om a Th$14J 4.' . A •.a.., I hate%Z look DITCH S�off.•S t� C 440'-' . Tr+p -I 3•.1 +�.� 13E RtPI�APF_c, 1b..) A< ?i WrT N I46TES 3 o.s vi-rr .3 8"- ITCH "a• C c z ar ce1o..+ wr+1c L 4 7- , 54-4 4- /7 6'0 L e/7 .r// /o/ s •g /ek 20 G3 09 a..✓ 3/(2164 REvI3 124* lac} Rw• I t i l f a15 Rev. t-2- R� ,r. Z -treys ( am••.) _ A Date Revision Drawn By: Date Designed By: Checked By: HORIZONTAL VERTICAL SCALE OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENG,. EER N. 811 Jefferson St. Spokane Wa. 99260 456- 3600 Appro { COUNTY ENGINEER ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 418 p er'+ci.4 ' G' N '7•E —40� ni es ° 42' .3 "/4/ yfA 11 4-Z ' ►ROVE TK4* z , �K i�rl+tL t Ga.mnE, r-rea 2. . Li 2 .04.0. E• 9r 11 +7. , 24 2.0 Cn -P S . os OVT�.LT iY.- 2O . C.o •_ a ILV a rrcr: E " PI 34.6 - I°' R 4 10.4.+0 L 35e•! T 141.09 /0100 / - 0 D1TC 24 . CP x' 20' C1-4•P> 5= 2036 DITCH /2-100 437 sew ,vote 6ekw 204.E . 40 111111.1111.111111111.11111111111111.111111111 4 1.11111111111111111111111.11111 -;t. :- =ER 1 4 N IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIEIE , 11111111111L 11111111111111 11.11160000 1.11111111111111.111111111111.11.1111111111. 11111 . 11111 0101101 0 1111 . 1111 MEM. _ __.. 41 kirEEMENEFirli "._,_ _ t $ IIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIWMIIMIIIME -! 111111111170 ,. sNF ./(?/ 4 it/r V C.4 — - 11101211NME n L .4----• WINE M MIME , NM /6, <n% /7/-r' REGION NO STATE FED AID PROJECT NO Appr. Revision Drawn By: Date D # signed By: Checked By: HORIZONTAL VERTICAL SCALE OFFICE OF SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER N. 11 Jefferson St. Spokane Wa. 99260 456- 3600 Date: COUNTY ENGINEER ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 418 i I 1,..,„T 5,r_ 2 y , i*a451 . Zvb®, ob fa r AJ, /e Vok Eli } 1 t OEM III AIM - t 1ff - z, NINE IIIIIIIIIrillWAEEIM ` _ R Ci �• - t - 1 RIM AMIE 111111WAININE MEE ..ailai FA1111111111111111Pr iniiiill. .:Illii Akir MI _ OE ui MIME 111M11111111111111111111111 11111"21 111111111111111111112111111 " IMINIWA 7.R1111111111111111111 IMAM 11111111101111111111 t = . IIMEBFAFAIZZIIIIIIIIEIIIIIIMIIIMIIIIIMI S illiffillEMENINIZIMPlill WEIMMIIIIIIiimifflai''SION11111111111111 AAPMIIIIMIIIIIKIIIIIMIIMIIMIIIIOAKVMOIINIIIMIMIEIIMIIMMI MEI= MI ME 11111111111E EMIR IIIIIIIINMINIIIIMIIIMIIIIW MI Milfis t .101111.1111111 11111=iffirif MI I h REM. MEI MI m 1,1111 IMPIZEMENIIMMIONAMEMEI ., rai _ EmmEmit_tmgim im C /oss ' ,j S D 6.r specs, 4 S D. O.1 5 45G} LT" C 0:3/. -3 /46 r0 ��4% Ty i c L. Ro A IJ kV "9 / Ti o n./ ;tie jca; 2 "ciuJ e-d ✓u /77 Cou/Je STATE FED AID PROJECT NO R= vision Drawn By: Date Designed By: Checked By: HORIZONTAL VERTICAL SCALE ,�° OFFiCE OF SPOKANl.... COU_'' ENGINEER N. 811 Jefferson St. Spokane Fla. 99260 456- 3600 COUNTY ENGINEER Date: ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 418 REGION NO __L 1111MErilli .D CH- I� r 2 k. I+Q4 s,� E.L.I, 2060,0 G I V t5E" L C /G /J v121 W, S. D,o,T v . 4 S 3.4AL?" CokJT" 5 -- Yzi-%b TV 1/4;f6' Ty / c, L % ,o ,n vv / ( ;/a J a /P 2 ,78 6jurHRIE E" $L\L , 2 S. 7 e Mocrtos A DR■ VE Z, so c:,, 4/r,7// NOTIFY LESLIE 11 KILLINGS!' ?I, P•E \VEST SPOKANE. DttJ1 C. fC9y1 ll�� " / / /i /rri,.... t if f " V)!,; ' \ _ 3-l3 -g•4 4 '5'64 K PLATE 1, PLAN- PROFILE KEUFFEL & ESSER CO. 48 / c_. O V S z Z 0 Q 0 oe z 0 0 U.! r- 0 6 Z Z COKJC :. i L. 1 Ni_ET \tf META'._ Ra Mme. ADD C�2AT TYOc Z J +c E_EVATIO J 2c 7'0 $(: , - 'c. 2 +o0 - t`I Plc -VIDE T`if Z Cor4C2€.he f JL.E7" w0- 1ETAt_ FTZAME AND Grc.ATE TK( Z CTATE EL, 105 1, EO /7 , t i s-r rz S2ES� f?�cTOR- STR`'c N2� o O;-�G d1 Zq' 0 2 * p 2z 3° E: ��S'i '•N ce r pi:' ':AM E'.-.• 4 2- 5 5+12 Psznv i DE 1-1 Cc. t_G . 114 L,t.T W ( Marti- F�►/yM�= A a GrzP-E r - t PE 2 Ge24wrE B 4_• 2oSl, fo Nom_: THE EX1STIhtG STREAM Ct-tANNEL, SHAM E. RELcc,PTTC) AS S1+owk/ OIQ T14E? PLAw5 A-T st_oct ap O. oo e >=T (t:o 1 - Awi SHALL. ADEQ( 1'ELY pt?A•IN To Tt-+E E)cl3T(l1G STizEANt (as St-,toW I I o t l Ris4.1 s. Th+c, Rcw(ATEC> C 464-1 NE.L 514Ac4 HAS A 3o'ITt7M W 1 DTH o1= t.lo; LESS Tl•tQN 4). p L4- Iti+Tt$Z tot O tTcl-H ce.c.(s.T2 EL 44 r txr, yrtr�aw+ Tt ' 3'• t •Hpc ._ BE RtPRaP t t..t AGCSyrZbAF.tcf, WLTH f46TE, 3 0 s t-rr 4 ," 1 ..,C + LESLIE D. Kitlll t" :tORTN, P.E. SPOK . ,. q; •�a 1Li,u F'tluiir: . y ;125-2190 PLATE 1, PLAN- PROFILE KEUFFEL & ESSER CO. A E) It U.S3A.' s ,' 9 ' O V S z Z 0 Q 0 oe z 0 0 U.! r- 0 6 Z Z COKJC :. i L. 1 Ni_ET \tf META'._ Ra Mme. ADD C�2AT TYOc Z J +c E_EVATIO J 2c 7'0 $(: , - 'c. 2 +o0 - t`I Plc -VIDE T`if Z Cor4C2€.he f JL.E7" w0- 1ETAt_ FTZAME AND Grc.ATE TK( Z CTATE EL, 105 1, EO /7 , t i s-r rz S2ES� f?�cTOR- STR`'c N2� o O;-�G d1 Zq' 0 2 * p 2z 3° E: ��S'i '•N ce r pi:' ':AM E'.-.• 4 2- 5 5+12 Psznv i DE 1-1 Cc. t_G . 114 L,t.T W ( Marti- F�►/yM�= A a GrzP-E r - t PE 2 Ge24wrE B 4_• 2oSl, fo Nom_: THE EX1STIhtG STREAM Ct-tANNEL, SHAM E. RELcc,PTTC) AS S1+owk/ OIQ T14E? PLAw5 A-T st_oct ap O. oo e >=T (t:o 1 - Awi SHALL. ADEQ( 1'ELY pt?A•IN To Tt-+E E)cl3T(l1G STizEANt (as St-,toW I I o t l Ris4.1 s. Th+c, Rcw(ATEC> C 464-1 NE.L 514Ac4 HAS A 3o'ITt7M W 1 DTH o1= t.lo; LESS Tl•tQN 4). p L4- Iti+Tt$Z tot O tTcl-H ce.c.(s.T2 EL 44 r txr, yrtr�aw+ Tt ' 3'• t •Hpc ._ BE RtPRaP t t..t AGCSyrZbAF.tcf, WLTH f46TE, 3 0 s t-rr 4 ," 1 ..,C + LESLIE D. Kitlll t" :tORTN, P.E. SPOK . ,. q; •�a 1Li,u F'tluiir: . y ;125-2190 PLATE 1, PLAN- PROFILE KEUFFEL & ESSER CO. A E) It U.S3A.' s ,' 9 ' iL L/ silk 84 8 o.+'rs ETEL• 20i5.l Drrc.4•• G.. N - 1 ° E -4o $r3, t 1 +ZO Pao vi "Tvive 2 , Cowrc iwacr w( META/_. FreAme" } Gad , T'YnE• 2. E.L. zoGO, E S T r a Ir +z,o, 24 ( 2o' ct..P,. 5 = o. •a OuT/..l.1 E.1.. 20 SS. Cpo sra Is +40°E PoovloE T'tPE. 2 Cbt-sC. INi.er w(MCTM_ FRAME ' t GRATE TYAE Z . GamcmE. Ems. 2041. 3o D I 'K1-1 *. E " rJ 341 - 4 ' -r 14ZO �Rc�J)t7E TYPE Z Cowc• 4NUZ'T, w/ kAerP Frt L*M E 5 SreA -1G 174;3E- 2_ CzvTE E4-• W6o PO 24'cpX3l;C 5 =0' (S 50 oc' 44: R 410. oG� L 350.9 T i a1.99 /Of O O //.7 TD i - rc 1--F /0 7'00 /3/ 00 5 t 49 ?6 cM ' .5 O ,OZ ZP G3 . f.o Sr7s S+ 41 — n2c2vioE - r-+r k-cizerr I ti w/ 1 L LT PIP€ Z 3c7 See A4 l d /ow zot:Z,4o "10 /71 /c9f P RM .,:„ NOTIFY THE 4 5 _; Mme, - t P ' c i . 'ci -- r :` f/ , /'/ O a IDLE K1[Uigv,TPTH, P.E. ?08 140 .:', 190 rse�i� 3.- la-$4 PLATE 1, PLAN-PROFILE KEUFFEL S ESSER CO. 48 7008 ADE IN U.S.A.• --= Cultivated Mani/la(e E /I 1 I, t3 L ip Oi 208.520 20:0.00 2.68/. 2081e/0 a 2 207640 2099.34 2o7P.2o . l t, ! 0 1 'I v094.001 1 .- ._ _ _ •k !9 •G n C £ - 4 - c ____ _______ c , r • e9 4 ..„--- 1- vi Z Ih eit oili.... _ 1 li-- -- kry-- I. NI 1 LI kil ki co i) * L... c..) t73. CI - , y , tt41) Qi . i''*'• ---4 I ...., (1/ la zi 1._, -" t c .)(JS-'1-i I t V) . 4 \*•14 1 1 Z 1 I) '1. I. to 4) tA 1 cv 00 0- - 0- 0 *el' - f• 4 — 43- t 0 4. IZI, 1- tv i n a) ■sa • t.) cu RI ..... — I.+ 4A c., Nj f r -4 t) 't — --f-- o --1- al o 4 ..-----.-W---- V) ti V 1 Z '� I SCALE 1" = 50' W Cornea Sec-bon 4_ 24 X 36 PRINTED ON NO. 1000H CLEARPRINT • 33 5 4-- of 0 wes.fer/i-. T 6 M El a/ 1 7. 8'9 lop ball n Fire hydron# loca4ecl ct long So c-t-the- side G cle- Pt v , e-a 57 e F p EC 4, T21-E, R44E ta 1024 .39.6 End -F p hnec7L pipe 4-0 ny I-nah hole /P ■ q 5 SO 0-5 18.66' S7'4 TT 4-- '71.5 Segionriu oF P roJact - 13e e ch a n / eKca va-kion ai 50 2. go 2080 2o7e) Zoo PLA N 99 (57"4/ f/otis) Exi-ting open channel Fcs Ode ros D/ Ext si-e n 2 - /8" C Draiiiage E 'Q....I'd /71 el/ I00 VALLEY G/i/ 24" GM N 2/ /2 " E N chaotic! N BLOCK .7' N le s` 14-" BLOCK 1.:/` s 7 9'1'4- cr9, 44 ecoin c.hat7riel Sta cT 7., L 72 - to S/ 9 1.r an/fort 'iii Smooi-hti =- i riprop chatinel -to provid e r7 PROFILE VISTA ESTATES 3 5 ' 1G1 House LI O& 6.4O' o. . 5 • 2oe s 101 N N. E,1 2.089. 4-0 • • IN • • s. 12" " X on ofigkirnerri. of (+en$/�h 04 . c cs cte- Fa InIrj17 ie2/I en d 102 s t verf El 2.08•.445' 5 - I - 4 / o +3 a Zo & 4. e ccE C to reducer- nec7 s 2 7 Main - / - a 14 a Lin/For/7i invert 91-acie 1 0 3 kis a - 1E3" CielP.1- SECTION ALONG it INLET CHANNEL CMP 6 " XFC0 Grot,iik1 MANI LL PPROVE1D 5Y P f sac? 4I• - If -401- c, C't - 110 .400.040 ' 2-F4 e.t id covet- or egua/ . , alevo A Provide as Crt ).1 D ETA / FiTY owNeR bo 3 D ATE ///h Aff:T ■OVD PRoPa OWNER LOT DA /c2 °' 9/ HP re p t graeiGid //We - 16)05, / t I I za.• t `/— S - E . CTI ON e PIPE INLET 1 1.:t sick /op rp concrete 1 e ./-c) place_ v te ci9 ro Li/ ci (02 e ,45TM 4- 9 8 7'0179 tie et-00tre Ma/11241/e ir-i-e/ - <A" Wall 'PrOitide 0 een/r)34 Flat 2.4'‘ civitos to co tzpecy- wi lii /-74Q4 ko /eS Rein Forc e cL onc. +e base poui-ed th place, /-1-6 A heIrs @ / (Q'S °TES 1; / roc, ript 9 yt(.B . 2. c // re / -icor r I Q s 'A" A PP19 v D \r E L 0 , -0* c' 1 0* • 4(1.1 ) `I 2 PATE hap. s ca 5 1 - p ri iea& wa I 1 61 9 '2 7-1 New she- i-evised 'Rev y vc- k1)7' ..5 dM ve_ga-7 14 f 9i 4 ZA-e) width rev. /Zs g ec l uce d 24 acyhe a cl-raivie I - 10/3.0/90 /81 7 shc7i/ EvIS/ONS SCALE: r DATE: /2 11 0 DRAINAGE PLAN L 0 T 2_ SLoCK 2. • . APPROVED BY : iehnre ill sa P, Co nsui DI )1_3 5 /19 n eer glz.5 DRAWN BY REVISED VAL LEY VISTA ESTATE5 DRAWING NUMBER 1 � 1 /, [[tom Ma fr11 e E J e v +-r a f7 " e I f .. j dd iJ t v i.. 1 208,5. 2a8oeoo aoei.zo 2041,10 a 208/./7 2o'76.00 'O97.34. 7o7f•2.o T V F E b e 1-1-- n i rig P?-! v S C A L. F = 50 24 X 36 PRINTED ON NO. 1000H CLEARPRINT e 3 3 5- 1 1 /4 Cop rer` 5- fro n 4- SEC 4, ` 7`a , 0 2,4 39. 61 End o p lo.je.c7 t7r7ec/- pipe 7L eX157' f 77a!? 1 2 l 1 `7. $'7 7'op o roue ei - tom /7 f-i r"$ F h ydr -cip !0Ca 4acad e-a T E b S Sxti7a�"'n•� sz°, a7 cl x _ x i / ,0, 43 Q 'lam 4 e q N 5 50 6.054/„ E 18_66 S i' 77' 7/.5 eeg//arr /`'9 o ` ` P I3 e � J / Ay channel e_ xco va -to s� 20 2 7U OP VALLEY 1< T,. TA T E 5 a ' � tsf /hq ape channel P LA N 20 a _ 99 f ; T /mo t-;. R 4 4 E 5' De-'a frr9e --e eh4' .Exrs7`tn5 2 - 18" C tief 10 ics Ps 1 9 0 Sfa q , G . g/n 2.4 �I \1 2/ ■ � )(I S4/113 `i1G BLOC K N N N I ° ;Fa l ¢" 0/ BLOCK /- • A 4-6 C/ P ry 35 ! 208 o t''I 1✓iecons-74r -uc74 chat -r-re Ft-0 t'ri Ste.~ q 9 72 - fo ; /Lt./ 9 g -0- c te3 . 7 r-a ri ` -5V 17 ca n GI 1 I' c7Y f Y / 77 I . ©& f-h f Z 1-1s7 l/ f c rip >s-eo p - 1 h / e 7 c..1 a ti r'7 e I -I- p 1°0 tr rear vv . h p r-°o /"'� ? t '/ o Z l i i c 4. ` Zo W i0 0 4. NN 0 \ N. E l ZO3 6.40 12" c i " 2.' z.. x ! IQN k1 117 n gar X er,SI -; 7 "r;' ? L 1- c In i ! E'`" C�.t J f f �� Brn 3o <, Cf'If'„ rya / ct I4P'' re. ducer°- /: fr- a / r f-a / in a Nor v to 6 V) ILI ` Ike E 2099. 3' QJ £4 fr? / - -� E03 n51'08 . 0 C/ 77 fa, r-r c b / /hr:C el b efweei, eat--t% 4'ocrrda- eon a d i oc rty "yid? SECTION A LO ) :t) 5/ a ff Ferhte /c 4 /%.Qi •s/ b e' °f` •y e e n c oe-r rcw., /1d eeicraa G 4d - c t /,� r4i p t'� r c;! - 1 8" C ?4 Ps 4 ..1 K1 r* E( 2,08 6".-40 S * c / 0 O +•34. 8 s , z3 ,. 7 SCT!ON @ f'Pr_ OV D 1 } rt vz" 6'' Ir I f rarr7e FCO azq 4- MAN 0 LL At PPROVEO 8'( F c R r PIPE as a 18 r..tr7d ccItiefr or . g uo I?va - tck A . D E T/ / L ''' it I ( T 3 J ' PRoP4_R -y. OV'/ ,{ LOT e / -.2,0-9/ CIA lc�c e t Uc / - l1° / p t €(...7 '?pi .tit. art€ -rr .fl �f LE T P r (Jr c ` 0hc r-e f r CI f / f/� - el cgroesyncf" l /07e 111 A-5 P4 4-9e 1 Lee 8., 9f--00tie Won ha /e 6 ,- / 't OJa11 I ' , . ' h""/? 0 4 bo l e 5 Red hror (2 0 ti< f - e ' base p „e/ r .p/ cE, / 7' 141 / 07 e2 PS sid 5/'Pt”' v et- 4E) j ES I tar C1 2. all re /0 .Forced c a 5 -- / // -- p/ ce c p /c £ 4-21/4-: y D AT E '4 added cr l l it - Co in t-t c 3 /zsA?9 /o/ 3 4/96 1 D ct t 1 New SCALE: ! f < ' S0 DATE: ie9 : 4 1 - 4 0 `✓ A 1 Cidded c ?P€°oVaI fdr _pro ' to - 3 h ea& re. 4r/7 /r tugIf 1 - e Ws /6 Q.. 11 P7 a 014e( 9'1-a 2 / w : ' / J A I / t- v- APPROVED BY: ` / ,c A a :..C "/ r r- l II 6 8/ r .igz 3 1 L , D 1'"t J C V / %_ PL A N {- r s, Tr..° ("..,---r° DRAWN BY REVISED Zd t DRAWING NUMBER 1 Y - ::: K� 1 FD. 1.1/4" PIPE RP's: TK. IN PPOLE S.W. 58. TK. IN PPOLE N.E.265 PK. IN CURB S.E. 625 END OF PROJECT STA. -17 + 65. 1 5 ;'' W. 1/4 CORNER FD. AXLE RP's. TK. 14 PINE N.W. 35. TK. 10 "PINE W. 10. TK. 24 "PINE S.E.39. 2677.77' N.89 12'57 "E. - 1383. 6 9 P. 136 ors `45 5 _ M.= 1357 M. 344.4 SOUTH LINE OF MYRON ESTATES No. 8 N. 89° 12' 0 5 0 0 p9` 6g' •332. 2688. • ° ®° p si ret A sO o 4 , 0 , tI 28964 0.66Ac.' A �;. s .4 ti , CURVE ARC CURVE NUMBER DELTA RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT NUMBER DELTA RADIUS •1 14 °45'45" 440.Q) 113.37 57.00 19 79°4 '23" 20.00 2 17 ,, 09'30" 410.0') 122.78 61.85 20 109 °09'21" 20.00 3 17 °09'30" 380.00 113.80 57.33 21 54 ° 32'48" 125.0o 4 26 0 02'31" 380.01) 172.72 87.88 22 7 ° 27'33" 150.00 5 26 °02'31" 410.0) 186.35 94.81 23 63 °31'32" 175.00 6 26°02'31" 440.0) 199.99 101.75 24 52 0 23'39" 175.00 7 19 °30'00" 440.00 149.75 75.61 25 11 °07'53" 175.00 8 06 °32'31 440.00 50,24 25.15 26 17 °19'04" 275.00 9 09 °30'21" 440.00 73.00 36.58 27 17 °19'04" 300.00 10 17°34'46" 440.00 135.00 68.04 28 17 °19'04" 325.00 11 17 °34'46" 440.0x' 135.00 68.04 29 11 °29'09" 305.00 12 50°09'44" 380.00 332,69 177.85 3o 25 °04'07" 305.00 1 3 5 ° 410 .on 358.95 191.89 31 36 °33'16" 305.00 14 50 °09'44" 440.00 385.22 2 32 3 ° 33'1 6 " 330.00 15 05°29'51" 440.00 42.22 21.13 33 36 °33'16" 355.00 16 08 °28'03" 440.0c 65.03 32.57 17 08 °43'28" 410.00 62.43 31.28 18 09°01'19" 380.0c 59.84 29.98 EiLCD Ui1 E} tC';i •l a UN 11 51. WILLIA} I :ONAI1UC AUDITOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASH. Dr'PUTY 8 297.30' 0.68 Ac. `5'PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (TYPICAL) l6 , 133.45' [,� - _ 224.7 7 2 �t7 54. e - _ - 224.77 4 S.88 38 S7 E. • Found •4 Rebar, ExceptWhere Noted 7 . Set No. 4 Rebar and ;op Field Measurement : Plat Measurement • Radial Bearing Curve Data Number ▪ 15' Drainage ;Easement WELBORN'S LAND S RVEY I C E. 7011 SECOND AVE. SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99212 (509) 926 -5959 ARC LENGTH TANGENT 27.86 ._ 16.73 38.10 28.12 119.00 64.44 184.46 105.93 194.03 108.35 160.03 86.10 34.00 17.05 83.12 41.88 90.68 4 5.69 98.23 49.49 61.14 30.67 133.45 67.81 194.59 100.74 210.54 108.99 226.49 117.25 N. I/4 CORNER FD. 3/4" PIPE RR's, PK. IN CURB S.W. 38. PK. IN CURB SE. 38 PK. IN EDGE ASPHALT 0 M c. 1/4 CORNER FD. AXLE TK. 8" PINE N.W. 21. TK. 8" PINE S.W. 26 TK. 10" PINE S. 7.71 DEDICATION Know ye all men by these presents that Ralph D. Guthrie and Gertrude 0. Guthrie husband and wife and Commerce Mortgage, a Washington Corporation, and Valley Vista Convalescent Center, a Washington Corporation, have caused to be platted into Lots, Blocks, and streets as shown on this map and be- ing more particularly described as follows: N. Mil A portion of Land in Government Lot 9, Ln Se tion 4, T24N, R44E, W.M., Spokane County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Government lot 9; thence N00 °40'12 "W along the West line of said Section 4, a distance of 433.08 feet to the True Point of beginning for this description. Thence continuing N00 ° 40'12 "W a distance 217.91 feet to a.point of a Non - Tangent curve having a Radial Bearing S4 ° 10'39 "E; thence along a curve to the right (having a delta 8 °28'03" and a radius of 440.00 feet) 65.03 feet; thence S85 6 42'36 "E 545.76 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta of 50 °09'44" and a radius 380.00 feet) 332.69 feet; thence N44 °07'40 "E a distance 365.66 feet to a point of a curve; thence along a curve to the left (having a delta 26 °02'31" and a radius 380.00 feet) 172.72 feet; thence N18 °05'09 "E - 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence on a curve to the right (having a delta 14 °45'45" and a radius 440.00 feet) 113.37 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve. Said point having a Radial S57 °09'06 "E; thence N89 ° 12'57 "E - 73.72 feet; thence S35 °14'39 "W -24.97 feet to a curve; thence along the curve to the left (having a delta 17 ° 09'30" and a radius 380.00 feet) 113.80 feet; thence S18 °05'09 "W - 117.30 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a delta of 19 °30'00 " a radius 440.00 feet) 149.75 feet to a Non - Tangent point on the curve having.a Radial Bearing N52e24'51 "W; thence S45 °52'20 "E - 199.86 feet; thence S44 °07'40'17 - 356.00 feet; thence S47 °09'45 "W a distance 165.22 feet; thence S62 °25'24 "W a distance :139.16 feet; thence S23 °46'32 "E - 287.22 feet; thence S01 °21'03 "W - 50.00 feet; thence N88 °38'57 "W - 224.77 feet to a point of a curve; thence along the curve to the right (having a delta 36 °33'16" and a radius 355.00 feet) 226.49 feet; thence N52 ° 05'41 "W - 149.10 feet; thence S37 °54'19 "W - 170.00 feet; thence N52° 05'41 "W -- 149.09 feet; thence N48 °15'43 "W - 308.08 feet to the point of•beginning. They do hereby deeticate for Public Use forever, . the right - way for all roads and Public Utilities as shown on the face of this Plat. For ourselves, our :b eirs and assigns, we do hereby enter into a covenant with the County of Spokane and do agree as follows: No more than one dwelling unit be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a.replat. A public water system as approved by County and State. Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will :provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited within this plat. The owners of hots 1,3,4,5,6,7, and 9, of Block 1, and Lots 2, and 3 of Block 2, shall be held responsible for obstructing and artifically collecting or discharging the natural or manmade drainage flow across or adjacent to their property. The property owner or his representative shall inform each suceeding purchaser . of all drainage easements on the property and his responsibility for maintaining drainage facilities within said•easements. Spokane does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage courses on private lots within drainage easements or flood plain areas nor the responsibility for any drainage,whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemination to any properties due to deficient construction and /or maintenance of drainage cour in drainage easements on private property. . ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Notary Residin State of Washington)55 County of Spokane ) On this . day of appeared Ralph D. Guthrie and trude 0. Guthrie husband and wife, - that execute the within and foregoing instrument and acknow- ledge to me the same as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes herein mention and hereon shown in witness whereof 1 have here unto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. On This 7:7 lay Of .�� , 1984, Before me erson- ally appeared 4`: . , ,� .:� known to me to be the of �i(� �#''j/� �.�.' 1��p.$ hat execute the within an fo go ing instrument and acknowledged to me that Yk executes the same as its free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes here in mentioned and hereon shown in witness whereof I have here- unto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. ` No ' ry Public S of Wa i>ton Residing at ON THIS 1 DAY OF aet.. ce , 1984 BEFORE ME PERSON- ALLY. APPEARED /, r�.s -- D, 'r¢•�ki4 eta-- KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE l a_a_ bite . 64 OF C . $4 al 1 t 4..E.- Al a 4:7-e 46.4 G o A'[ P y THAT EXECUTE THE WITHIN AND FOREGOING INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT EXECUTES THE SAME AS ITS FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES HERE IN MENTIONED AND HEREON SHOWN IN WITNESS WHEREOF I HAVE HERE - UNTO SET MY HAND AND AFFIXED MY OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. ' NO ARY PUBLI _T DEDICATION CONTINUED Subject to specific application approval and issuance of -: ` -s by the Health Officer, each lot is authorized the use of ar, dividual on -site sewage system. The owner, his heirs and successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal ments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) establish- ed pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area -wide collection systems. Lot 5, block 2, and lot 4, block 2, are 1 foot strips and are hereby dedicated to Spokane County as general county property to be dedicated for roadway purposes at such time as roads are extended as full width public right -of -ways and /or adjacent lands are platted. Valley Vista Convalescent Center By President: Ralph D. Guthrie pany AA SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE - SPOKANE COUNTY PLATTING ORDINANCE. Date Eugene H. Welborn L.S. No. 15043 DIRECTOR OF COUNTY UTILITIES EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS -! I DAY OF a. COUNTY ENGINEER EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THIS PLAT WAS APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, THIS // DAY OF �/t /fie 1985 PLANNING DEPARTMENT,DIRECTOR EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS / DAY OF Health Officer COUNTY T,R A I ' I,•ncl?t-k'._ `kR, , Treasure of Spokane County, Washington do hereby certify t h at all taxes which have been levied and become chargeable against the land shown within this map and described in the dedication of this date, have been fully paid, satisfied, and discharged. this 11 ' day of tiLA 1985. t ' () Jiving+. D4 A/vs,ir o 715 /z Y ', .....3 z c f T.p /C:d/ /-4,71 /z o- .2_4 7; Ac65 07c /li " SS P %oasg a' Z.c'r 77 li e>6. \ \ \( 1 \ / \\ \\\ \� \ \\ \ s ..1_ -;1-7- - -ir // / / /// / 1 / .-2 1 //// / t� ///// 1 / ID (� �� / / / /// 1 1 UM gD,c, A 3 °e ., , "J \` < - - - °15 ., /, / 0 \\ r 1 ,--(� / / N 0 1 1 i / / ( 1 1 / // / i / /,i / j ���� / /// -- - - -_- -,,- _-i 2p7' - - _ -- -- - -__ _ / % nP 7/" F- _ ix�/c_r 1 L 1.� i t.� -- � 10 . N\ ._ \ o f / . 1 ,� i --\ \� ) f 11. ---- --' \ \\ 1) l 1 , _ moo ; \ t ti /,� , / i / 1 , �. \ T/ / m� V x 2 ♦ \.� /� 11 / `I��, /// � ` \ ,. /! 1 ) \1.iI( I _.• / /' -\ \\ x( 1 , 1 7 /I J P, i it11/ 1 \ I f� — / // �� '\ � ..J �' - - , - -- - , l 1 - ' -' -- - ice ' , - r'VV1 I \ ` \......---1,- 1 ✓,„ �_-- -- , , \•-' i \∎ i/ 74•77,p �✓ UPIP1ATT i' Vi . ■ / ------ i = - ti 1 / / 4//4%;:-....„1, i / / /// i1 -\ ` \ s /, / � / //, \\ 1 / / 1/ 1 // , .., .. � -J /, / /�/ , \ /, // / 1 / 1/ // i � � / . N 1 /i �� j / 1 • \�� i/ /----'//f , I 1 ■ � I ? - /1 \ \ \ 1 i 1 1 .1 \ , 1 \ l ,- ,�_ / j J j / / j --� `�' / 1 // / //// / 1 1 1\ i 1 (// , 1 \ 11 r f / �\ 11 I �1 I 1 \\ \ I I 1 i►(( 1 \ \ t \ 1 111) `\ \ �� 1\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\\ \\ \�` - _ \ \∎ � � \ \ - - - - - j \ \ � \ \ \ \ \ 1\ r ) 1 ` \ i t .... \ \ \\ \‘':' /\/<:,.11....7:7___77:::::::1'.•-,i' I‘i 1 I 1 � \ 1 / \ • • \ 1 j / - .� \ I UPIP1A°,_ SBIF /d �.G?3 d0 svG6 1 J air -t a : ;9 ''::. 64, 3 l ;x 4 cr...- t O4f t.a:•' ba V ` et V/ V 9 P ;LELThIBIAWI 1 VALI& ZY J itI A JJit11thi f G OV, I I f - r $iC 4 ; ': 24 `� t, 4 ' 1 1 4 ,AM, 67e-ea sC = S� Coe S SC = A/c 4= `!Ithtili {t /t(dri,7G- Y s S L. C, ,7 406177 S o ne . Cbrr7 / / Y s i .Lex:9,77 This Check -mod 4 1 7z/ E. . �o/eaue- Ptidrd ado. A s t • -jeAer -zoo 4c 9 7 VALLEY VISTA ESTATES PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 9 SF,CTION 4. T.24E.. R.4 4E.. W.M. , AMENDED DRAINAGE EASEMENT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 2, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES. PoN' OE.R 05 A DR \V E. N, 5s ° 42 3LP SCALD 1- 50' SUR\/ -.Y0R5 CE.RTIFICATtON TN 15 M t\ P C4 R RS, C V L`( R F- P R E,5 E.1JTS A SURVEY Miw g■ M AT 114 RE-• u E.s r of RALPH CZ u'i'1- 1R1'E. 11\1 5sPT.. .1990 ELBORt 'S LAN! SURVEYING, INC. P.S. E. 7011 SECOND AVE. SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99212 (509) 926 -5959 J015 58490 SECTION 4. T.24E.. R.4 4E.. W.M. AMENDED DRAINAGE EASEMENT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 2, VALLEY VISTA ESTATES. PON! OER 05 A DR.\ V E.. N 65°4-2-' L Sc 1"- O SUN:7,\LEN(OR C.RTIFIGATION I 11-I 15 W1' Co IZR..C.1' RE-PRE.5E.INITS 5u1vE..y MADE- 'E!)\( M T - c - k-k u e_s oF 'RALPH CILATI-I'RtE.- t c5ep 1990 WARN'S LAND' SURVEYING, INC. P.S. E. 701 1 SECOND AVE. SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99212 (509) 926-5959 RECEIVED, r:.td 7 '1990 County Engineering J o ti" 8490 PRELIM. PLAT SUBMITTAL ROAD AND DRAINAGE PLAN SUBMITTAL e- /s -s3 /< /<` < c Q 10 4 -7 , 1 'v x) 2 ' 15. S s o N COMMENTS TO DEVELOPERS ENGINEER / - /- /- 2o-g,' REVISION ) ® _ SUBMITTED / ' � REVIEW a -a -I -gq SUBSEQUENT COMMENTS TO DEVELOPERS ENGINEER 1 .2.64 -L 2 - 2 / -6'_IC / - .30 -Ty SUBSEQUENT o h o o \ v PLAN ORIGINALS SIGNED • o PLAT NAME AND N TBER rs COPIES TO CONSTRUCTION & PLAT FILE PLAT PLAN C REVIEW FLOW DIAGRAM FOR PE-144:101 2//O 2 /00 \ 20 90 N, O a N , sc to tia O � ti - EX /5T �--___ \ ROU,t/D SURFACE U /TCH .BOTTOM \S 0 2080 /c. .C� = 5.02 2= 96 �c °c\- NN �� � � o \ /0 'VC. N � � \ \-,,, ---, 2070 /8.5% L = 74' R O N ''- N(\t m Y � a + N ` t o 'N C -/3% 4=/5' ., AO'V. e. AF 48066A • \ • /3' N x`27 ■ 1 6 • • • \ • • 1 • / , • • • • ./ • • • / / / / / / / / / / / / , / / / / / / 1/ 4 0 / • • • • • • • / / 1 / / / / // / / / / / / ./ Ot00 39' 35 \ • \ • \ • \ • \ \ • • \ • • • • • \ \ \ • \ \ \ ■ • \ • • • • • • • ` • A G N. S • • \ \ \ \\ \ ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ • ` ` N. \ \ • \ \ \\ • ` \\ \ \ • \ \ • \ \ \ \ \ ` N. ` o DITCH PLAN LOT 8, BLOCK 1, MOHAWK ESTATES SCALE: 1" = 20' /R4W4t/EE Lq�t/E • \ .\ 20 ' 20 !o /0°Io26- 4: RI� • \\ • ` .t / / ... _ _ • / ; / , c�a8s ` \ \ r ` \ _� /�� D /.VAC�E EASEMENT , To BE fI,BAit/DONE� cg VI . M : " \ \ , / , ,, / N • N: ... ■ \ `� , 9 \ , VEW ORA /NF/G�E / / / ,' lU' EASEMENT l3OUJvARS/ , /' ,' �' / ,Cn 2 , N. N , 2 \ N .s. ..... 2 N. , \ \ `� \ \� ■ `\\\\�\. , ' / / / -. \ \ �k � � X 1 N. • N. \ N till". „,. • • N. -- / / ., / • \ \ \ • � i \. -- DITCH PROFILE HORZ. SCALE: 1" = 20' VERT. SCALE: 1" = 10' VOTE = PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE Ai°PROX. SEE D /TCH PROF / L E FOR OETA /G S. CONSTRUCTION NOTES ,T? 1. Material for the berm shall be a gravelly soil with a minimum of 10% silt and a maximum of 20 %. This material shall be compacted to at least 95% max. density as compared with ASTM D1557. 2. R i prap for stations 0 + 00 to 0 + 25 and 1 + 06 to 2 + 27 shall /'1/E 50Z 0r /!E ✓�rONE 4�EtirERT//A,u 7. Between stations 0 + 25 and 1 + 06 riprap'shall be 3-inch minus. ALL Rock 5.vRcc weigh a minimum of 165#/ft3. 3 Material excavated from ditch (waste material) may be used berm. To bring it to a 4:1 (4 horizontal to 1 vertical)'siope. 4. Clearing and grubbing limits are specified on cross sections Outside the limits of clearing; trees shall remain in place, and shall not be disturbed during construction. 5. Construction is to be performed in general accordance with Standard Specifications. DEVE.G OPER5 5 / l./RE behind EL. 2052. D6 , SPOKANE COL/V7 OATUM. To,' OF /%4" /.Q'o,c/ P/PE 4/1.7 T/-/E Ali/I/. CORNER OF 41oHAw,e ESTATES. SEE 1//c /,/ /Ty Rgic for L oC//T /a.4/ "DATE L /M /TS OF CLE.9R /./ 2/00 2095 20.90 EX /ST. �T, q:71/ St./APE/CE k 1 BERM SECTION "A" - "A" 6 / 7 /P RAP SEE A/oTE 2 DITCH SECTION "B" “B" L /M /T5 OF �L/F3/3 /,t/ /0" .G//0/7 OF CL EAf'/,VC4 2' GDu C Z2 L /M /T5 RU,3.5 /,t/ VICINITY MAP N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. 11P .� ( SEE A/ore R/P RAP SEE ,t/ rE 2 EX /5T. cRO/J.(1O SURFACE / / /_ /// o!% i /AR /E5 W /TN ,W /4/ 4"/ SLOPE See /t/or Adams & Clark, Inc Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors Land Planners • Landscape Architects N.501 RIVERPOINT BLVD. SPOKANE, WA. 99202 (509) 747 -4600 Daniel B. Clark, P.L.S. Leslie D. Killingsworth, P.E. Stuart A. Deysenroth, A.S.L.A. PROJECT TITLE: DEAN GRAFOS MOHAWK ESTATES /O -/3 -89 Date Drawn: Designed By: Drawn By: Checked By: Field Book No • 331 - �2 Sec. 3 ,T. 24 N.,R. iL E WM Work Order No • . Revision By Date NORTH SCALE SHEET nu 111 sio iii. VE2TICAL GIL1C1-1 STAY AT 5' MAX. SPACING � . . �i -,- -, ,..6' ». No. Date ; �� Ckd. - -. +. .. Revision .. . ,.. r r ..ero. �..: ... Y, r 4� :.t lia'!K �- - I la nu 111 sio ., iii ._ .... ,.. .. � . . -,- -, ,..6' ». No. Date By Ckd. Appr. +. .. Revision .. . ,.. r r ..ero. �..: ... Y, r 4� :.t lia'!K TWO ST2AIJD IZ GA. 4 POI1JTED EA215ED W12E • f.JO SCALE )2/W STA. 39 +00 TO 49 +00 LT 160 +00 TO 1(0(0+00 L.T. 187 +00 TO 192+00I2T. BACK FILL W/ 1.0' TOPSOIL TYPE 4-3 (SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS) 4.5-10' r2 /W DITGIULIIJE SI-IOU L DE12 --\ ELJD f526 :E (TYP) SEE W.D.O.T. STD.'PLAIJ G -S 0.60' CSTC. STA. 7 +00 TO STA. 9 STA . Z 11+00 TO STA . 212 +00 LT TYPICAL FIELD APPI2OAG1• -1 SMOOTI -1 9 GA. WIt2E GATE LATCHES WIRE FEIJC.E -TYPE 2. O' 30 ' /5 /5' MAX. SUPER 6 2 '/0 ■ 4 Wihru VAI2IES AS S1.4OWLJ o,J PLAIDS NO SCALE SEE W. D.OT. STD. PLAIJ C.-8 ;3x 1 y: Bar: R= 10' SURFACING TO BE 0.50' C.S. T. 0. SPREAD / & COMPACTED THE FULL WIDTH OF THE APPROACH FROM SHOULDER TO R /14/ LINE. CULVERTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN DITCH LINE WHERE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 30' P.ST GLA' MAX SC1PE,2 50 L.T. 025'CSTC . 0.75 CSf3G STA 9+ so -1-0 STA. 148+00 STA ` 1107 +52 TO STA 211 +00 EXIST. STI2UCTU12AL SECT Oki STA. 148 +00 TO STA. 1107+52. TYPICAL. SECTIOIU5 NO SCALE EXIST. 6772LUCTU12AL SECTIOIJ MAX. SUPER 6 2 13:37 CL. A' 0.25'C5TC 0.50 C5/3G 0.76' f3142-.. fla t .Ja8¢ 15' 30' / ������ %:�� • o' CULVERT PIPE 6 0• 4 � VA.1ES 0 SIDE VIEW • l / /1/1 'Q I' 3 .� 5ST CL. A' 0.50' G .STG STA. 8+50 TO STA. 9+50 1 2 T. STA. 211 +00 TO STA. 21'6+50 27-. 300 LIGHT LOOSE 2.IP "RAP / FILTE2 5LAIJK.ET EfJn VIEW TYPICAL 12.IP RAP HEAD WALL ,J0 SGAL E no l ' r f , l . 9 2 O ro I2 /W R/W I) / 1 -S O 3. JAo 0V 31 (�3 ( 5 0 ;Le, .PsA /9 /tCbeo _ e-e ex w�c. EXIST ROADWAY i s _ = - = _ _ _ _ tit, w� fl3 , 1 /.e. �e r C{, CONSTRUCT CONC. HEAD -WALL WITH STEP MITERED END (SEE 7N. D. 0. T STD. PLAN 8 -9) '153 - < 0 i 3 ° o+` 14. e g . 2 ( + 66 1 154 /( kQ re(oe_ 0 wi& S evv� e C aQ�2lJ b/ 30' Q 0 CURVE DATA LS.= 43 11' 3: R =500( -- L= 3769' T= 19.79' x x 3 e- 5TA. 152 +40 TO /54 +70 T YP/CAL SECTIOLJ NO SCALE o 0 , EX /STIIJ6 N !d 30' 1]1S7 VARIES SEE PLAYS G ROU4JbL /QE EXISTI,UG GREEK GI- lA,U,UEL .100' L. L. RIP RAP .0.50 FILTER BLANKET C /115 DATA Dl2AIIJAGE A• 34 ,ji•7' O1" P,= 50.0' L=30.5,5 T= 1577' ac - 7 EASEMEIJT _S O6 ° 44: 57 ' 70' of �5E • � , 5 - 8.8� , 0 to STA. 74.721 5; END CREEK CHANNEL REAL /GNMENT 157 +25 5 1 06 29'E VAQ1ES 0 N 7'72.15 . 17 co' 7- • COIJSTI2UCT TO THE TOE OF FILL 02 AS P1I2.ECTED BY THE EIJGIIJEEI2. SHEET NO. REGION NO „ 4) STA. 1 4-00, BEGIN CREEK CHANNEL REAL /GN/IENT OLD CREEK CHANNEL EX /ST. CHANNEL PLACE 20' DEPTH LIGHT LOOSE f9/P RAP- - W/TH 0..5' FILTER BLANKET AS DIRECTED 8Y THE ENG /NEER CONSTRUCT CONC. HEADWALL WITH STEP MITERED END .(SEE 1/Y. S. D. O. T. STD PLAN 8 -9) 1/2 CURVE DATA L= 4158'14" .R= 50.0' L= 36.63' T= 19.18' TO 4.3E VACATE/ 30' 152+'35 CHENEY -PLAZA RD 152+70 1A 0.5' . T'r�: ::.."' 'TT? "t t F �n.t k i N C o - . a NuX ti CURVE DATA &=28 38' 52" R= 50.0' L= 250' T= 1277' (Do go P/2 OPOSEO 12 /W & , A N 30' SIDE VIEW TYPICAL 12IP RAP SPILLWAY LL&1 -t7- LOOSE RIP 2AP FILTEI2 13LA}JKET P12OPOSED Lio SCALE +79. /3 BRIDGE NO. 2102 STA. 156 4-1155 & STA. 1554-28. , CONSTRUCT 2- PLA/ .' STEEL CULVERT PIPE ARCH 0 0.168 /// TH. 85 IN SPAN 0 Jj .J CONSTRUCT ON A 50 SKEW & 0.6% SLOPE BONN /E CREEK CULVERT P /PE. /NSTAL LA T /ON AND CA/ANNEL REALIGNMENT SCALE. .1" = 50' STA. 1974.20.87 & STA. 19,'4-3313, CONSTRUCT 2- PLAIN STEEL CULVERT Pr PE ARCH 0.168 /N. TH. 85" SPAN. CONSTRUCT ON A 30 SKEW & 1.05% SLOPE. EX /ST. BRIDGE NO. 2104 198 PLACE 10' DEPTH LIGHT LOOSE RIP RAP WITH 0..5' FILTER BLANKET AS D/RECTER BY THE ENG /NEER CHENEY -PLAZA "TOAD CRP 2085 FA. NO - RS.A32O0 .TYPICAL X-SECTIONS AND DETAILS 199 0 to gs. &FQ L) K OO OcWi C 2 ° _o 0 c 2 <)8• , c7 0 � c0 03770 0 P2 OPOSED RI EIJD VIEW (MAX. SO') ORA1llJAerE 157 VARIES n/2 5' 9 0 STATE WASH CULVERT' PIPE EASEMEtJT VAR /ES 5 1+ Of- 158 FED. AID PROJECT NO. F.A. NO.-85.A3 200 100' LIGHT LOOSE RIP RAP 0.50' FILTER BLANKET 250' LIGHT LOOSE RIP RAP 050' F/L TER BLANKET * STA. 24-78 TO 34-40 STA. 64-80 TO 74-72 0 2 03 C5> (:) 2' a 0; 2 1 4=9/47'14" Ri 50.0' = 80.10 T-- 5158' 1 oC STA. 1554-20 & 1974-27 PLACE 10' DEPTH OF LIGHT LOOSE RIP RAP WITH 0.50' DEPTH FILTER SZANKET AROUND OUTLET OF P /PE ARCHES A SHOWN STA. 1 4-00 TO 24-78 STA. 44-40 TO 6-80 CURVE DATA 2 1 EIRUNING ELIMINARY PLAT OF ICI \ITY MAP (. rester 0.0 zoi BM 2 36 �„ Weli tl'2014 7036 GOVT LOT 8 GOV' T LOT 9 PLAT DATA SIZE OF PLAT: NUMBER OF LOTS: SIZE RANGE IN LOTS: FRONTAGE RANGE: REQUESTED ZONING: WATER SUPPL.YER: DATE: 25.5 ACRES 35 .5 TO .7 AC. 110' TO 190' SINGLE FAMILY RES. (R -1) SPOKANE SUBURBAN WATER AUGUST 1985 BEING A PORTION 0= Si IB1/4 A \1 SOV T LOT B A \I 30V S TION L TOnI \S:- 2L SORT- RANG LL -AST n . . SPO<ANE COL \TY AAS I \CTON L \PLATT SURVEYOR S STKFE'MENT: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT WAS PREPARED FROM EXISTING SPOKANE COUNTY RECORDS AND DOES NOT REPRESENT AN ACTUAL SURVEY. ONALD DUNSMORE P L.S. ilHllllllillHlflttlHHItIll iliHi 11111 till • +)■* LOT 2 AND 3 BLOCK 2 VA VISTA ESTATES TO RELOCATE DRAINAGE EASEM ` AS SHOWN HEREON BEING PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUAR ' OF SECTION 4 OWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST, WM.,; SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON U7e\ /)'""t:3 /. C '/ 77 /CA7 ON .lU /E I8 1��2 11°ER - ORA∎1 4 SURVEY IN Tf-/ �lEL.G7 ?'t� VAL/O.47'E A4A/Vf,/OLE At-i�9 ©O : 5T.�41c S X/ 77t ./ L44-1tC1-i 7'1-1 CENTYRG./ E Q, T L/ PF 3 , EG> 0 /.4/ E .14Si1.4E" T. "ALL. 14// r 'Et Tt t/,ELY /774"/ POs /77o,v9 s ewn✓ Oiv 77 ► / 77 .. 7�fi E 0,EO /C /77OAi/ /■R Ala 1=.A?". 4.7" 77O/d1 iT it44 / /v5 '7' e4 " Ae.'RECC ?2o o v 'T /A/AL " °'C� 6� 1..E V/ 74 , LO 7, L 2 ENO E'XC 77.1/ O IV iE , ,5 1 1 A 01C3/1441.2.Y .90 / At4/1,77. NEW 1.4410 /A/At 3E E.45 ,EXfiEN r PS C/A SHOW/ A ' EOt (I) RECORD //c*OA4' V4.4L.L�Y V/67,4 /AYES �O JAID WOOO T.4K� ..yliv 1. io /AZ / 9 v O 4.07. 7 DAVID S ASSOCIATES, INC. NORTH 920 WASTrI NGTON STREET RITE I7• SPOKANE, a:45HL%TON 99201 • (509) 32' -1697. AA/0 CO y'" coA4Adreat0A/E-ms at= A / r ., )"1° : VISTA VALLEY mi..ociterrE AORAitArAse .. !. �r �"' N r .1 IltillItMOVIIMMIMIOMM1117"01•1”, . 1:7 0/\/ re, r p A •St../F1/ /Ai ,=*11,..C) •C) VA/A7 41A"//404.- A /•,/ wcoc, P1/1-/IC,L1 ./ rAie )C1' iet=lopctsz:> / ic:m1/44 , Mai ti ' ( e E)eva*(ot7s "A' h H 1 C8Sa 2.)o aoffi±ao 2.c 7/ +34= 2gh(O a 28I.f7 20 ?6.oO 2o70