The URL can be used to link to this page

Ordinance 10-007 Amending Comp Plan " l • 4110 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 10-007 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS INITIALLY ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE 06-010 AND LAST AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 09-039;AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, through Spokane Valley Ordinance 06-010, the City of Spokane Valley adopted Land Use plans as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan, and Maps as the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Spokane Valley; and WHEREAS,the Washington State Growth Management Act(GMA)allows comprehensive plans to be amended annually(RCW 36.70A130);and WHEREAS, amendments to the City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan may be initiated by the Planning Commission (Commission), the City Council (Council), Citizens or by the Community Development Director based on citizen requests or when changed conditions warrant adjustments; and WHEREAS, the GMA requires comprehensive plans to be implemented with development regulations, including the zoning of property consistent with land use map designations; and WHEREAS, consistent with the GMA, City of Spokane Valley adopted Public Participation Guidelines to direct the public involvement process for adopting and amending comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS,the Uniform Development Code (UDC)provides that amendment applications shall be received until November 1 of each year; and WHEREAS, applications were submitted by the applicant, owner or by City staff to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map for the purpose of beneficially using the property described herein; and WHEREAS, following the application to the City, staff conducted an environmental review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, after reviewing the Environmental Checklists, staff issued Determinations of Nonsignificance (DNS) on February 5, 2010 for the proposals, published the DNS in the Valley News Herald on February 5,2010, and where appropriate posted the DNS on the sites and mailed the DNS to all affected public agencies; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified on January 29, 2010 pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106 providing a 60-day notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Commission conducted a briefing on February 11, 2010 to review the proposed amendments;and WHEREAS, notice of the Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald on February 5,2010; and Ordinance 10-007 Comp Plan Amendments Page 1 of 5 1 • • WHEREAS, on February 5, 2010, notice of the Commission hearing was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of the subject properties ; and WHEREAS, notice of the hearing was posted on the subject properties; and WHEREAS,the Commission conducted a public hearing on February 25, 2010 at which time the Commission received evidence, information, public testimony and a staff report and recommendation; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing and after deliberating on the proposed amendments and information presented during the course of the hearing developed,the Commission deliberated on CPA-01-10 through CPA-08-10 and recommended approval of all amendment proposals; and WHEREAS, on March 30, 2010, Council reviewed the Commission's recommendations on the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments; and WHEREAS, on April 13, 2010, Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, on April 27, 2010, Council considered a second ordinance reading at which time Council approved written findings of fact setting forth their basis for approval of the proposed amendments. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the Comprehensive Plan adopted through Ordinance No. 06-010. Section 2. Findings. The City Council acknowledges that the Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to Comprehensive Plan and approves the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan map and text. The City Council hereby adopts the Commission's findings, specifically that: 1. Notice for the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald on February 5, 2010 and each site was posted with a"Notice of Public Hearing" sign,with a description of the proposal. 2. Individual notice of the map amendment proposals was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each affected site. 3. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA—RCW 43.2IC)environmental checklists were required for each proposed comprehensive plan map and text amendment. 4. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each comprehensive plan amendment request. Determinations of Non-significance(DNS)were issued for the requested comprehensive plan amendments on February 5,2010. 5. The DNS's were published in the city's official newspaper on February 5, 2010 consistent with the City of Spokane Valley Environmental Ordinance. 6. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on February 25, 2010,to consider the proposed amendments. After hearing public testimony,the Commission made recommendations on CPA-01-10 through CPA-08-10. 7. The planning goals of the Growth Management Act (GMA) were considered and the proposed amendments are consistent with the GMA. Ordinance 10-007 Comp Plan Amendments Page 2 of 5 • 110 8. The goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan were considered and the proposed amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 9. The proposed land use and zoning designations are consistent with the current use of the properties. 10. Findings were made and factors were considered to ensure compliance with approval criteria contained in Section 17.80.140 H. (Comprehensive Plan amendment and area-wide rezones) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC). 11. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and text amendments will not adversely affect the public's general health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Property. The properties subject to this Ordinance are described in Attachment Section 4. Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.073 the City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan as adopted through Ordinance No. 06-010, is hereby amended as set forth in Attachment "A" (maps) and `B" (text). The Comprehensive Plan Amendments are generally described as follows: Map Amendments File No. CPA-O1-10: Application/Description of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change the designation on parcel 45182.9010 from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial with a corresponding zoning change from Single-family Residential District (R-3) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC). This proposal is considered a non-project action under RCW 43.21C. Applicant: Bernardo-Wills Architects-Attn: Gary Bernardo Amendment Location: Parcel 45182.9010; located on the northeast corner of Park Road and Broadway Avenue; further located in the south half of the northwest quarter of Section 18, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Council Decision: Change Parcel 45182.9010 to Neighborhood Commercial. File No. CPA-02-10: Application/Description of Proposal: City initiated site specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment on parcels 45114.9009 from Parks/Open Space (P/OS) to Heavy Industrial (HI) with a corresponding zoning change from Parks/Open Space (P/OS) to Heavy Industrial (I-2). This proposal is considered a non-project action under RCW 43.21C. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley Amendment Location: The proposed site is located on the west side of Sullivan Road, approximately 1600 feet north of Indiana Avenue; further located in the north half of the southeast quarter of Section 11, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Counsel Decision: Change Parcel 45114.9009 to Heavy Industrial (HI) File No. CPA-03-10: Application/Description of Proposal: City initiated site specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment on parcel 45013.9104 from Community Commercial (C) to Heavy Industrial (HI) with a corresponding zoning change from Community Commercial (C)to Heavy Industrial (I-2). This proposal is considered a non-project action under RCW 43.21C. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley Amendment Location: The proposal is located between Sullivan Road and Industrial Park 1st in the Spokane Valley Industrial Park. It is further located in the west half of the southwest quarter of Section 01,Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington. Council Decision: Change Parcel 45013.9104 to Heavy Industrial(HI) Ordinance 10-007 Comp Plan Amendments Page 3 of 5 • • Text Amendments File No.CPA-04-10: Application/Description of Proposal: A City initiated text amendment to Chapter 2—Land Use: New policy language addresses development agreements in association with site-specific comprehensive plan map amendments. Text amendments also integrate policy language to supplement existing goals to support acquiring open space,publicizing the community's heritage,and connecting neighborhoods. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 2—Land Use will have city-wide implications. Council Decision: Adopt Text amendments to Chapter 2—Land Use. File No. CPA-05-10 Application/Description of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 3 —Transportation: Map 3.1,Arterial Street Plan,displays the federal reclassification of Conklin Street(Urban Local Access to Collector Arterial) and Indiana Avenue(Urban Local Access to Urban Minor Arterial). Map 3.2, Bike and Pedestrian System, displays newly developed bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Map 3.7, Local Access Street Plan, is a new map identifying future access streets within the City of Spokane Valley to improve connectivity and emergency access. Text amendments integrate policy language to supplement existing goals to support linking facilities with non-motorized transportation routes, increasing the percent of total miles of bike lanes in the City,and encouraging fuel-efficient vehicles in the public transportation system. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 3 — Transportation will have city-wide implications. Council Decision: Adopt text amendments to Chapter 3—Transportation. File No. CPA-06-10 Application/Description of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 4—Capital Facilities Plan(CFP)and Public Services: Text amendments incorporate changes in the 6-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) into the Capital Facilities Plan to ensure consistency. The Level of Service(LOS)table identifies the current six-year and twenty-year level of service analysis for all arterial intersections in the City of Spokane Valley. Text amendments also update the growth assumptions to reflect population allocation numbers approved by the Spokane County Board of Commissioners. New text will integrate policy language to supplement existing goals to support water conservation, recycling, limiting harmful chemicals, and education programs that result in local employment. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 4 — CFP & Public Services will have city-wide implications. PC Recommendation: Adopt text amendments to Chapter 4—CFP& Public Services. File No. CPA-07-10 Application/Description of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 7 — Economic Development: Amendments integrate policy language to supplement existing goals to support local businesses, living wages, efficient practices, and clean technologies. Map, 7.1, Development Activity, displays 2009 development activity. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 7 — Economic Development will have city-wide implications. PC Recommendation: Adopt text amendments to Chapter 7—Economic Development. Ordinance 10-007 Comp Plan Amendments Page 4 of 5 • S File No. CPA-08-09 Application/Description of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 8 —Natural Environment: New text integrates policy language to supplement existing goals to protect the aquifer, groundwater, and priority habit species. Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 8 — Natural Environment will have city-wide implications. PC Recommendation: Adopt text amendments to Chapter 8—Natural Environment. Section 5. Copies on File-Administrative Action. The Comprehensive Plan (with Maps) is maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well, as the City Department of Community Development. The City Manager or designee, following adoption of this Ordinance, is authorized to modify the Comprehensive Plan in a manner consistent with this Ordinance. Section 6. Liability. The express intent of the City of Spokane Valley is that the 1 responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals or organizations. Section 7. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance. Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five(5)days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council this 27"'day of April,2010 e"---- 1.- "---1 X C4-1---.----el Mayor,Thomas E.Towe A:241,11: City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: - —. d// Effective Date: ,j /,_9 - 02(3/7) Ordinance 10-007 Comp Plan Amendments Page 5 of 5 • • Attachment A Exhibit 1 : Comprehensive Plan Map • Lihht Industrial �ight.Indush tal Low Density Residential • 1 Low Density Residential Cataldo Cataldo = Centennial Middle Pa k/Open Spaee 911777f Low Density Residentia / CPA-01-10 Low Density Residential 0 oa.w.y Broadway Broadway Neighborhood 'Compile)ctal et � f I • CPA-01-10 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from LDR to NC;subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from R-3 to NC. I • Exhibit 1 : Comprehensive Plan Map 0 r�i Commercial I sD J I J °1 1KD ° u fFrMisi it 4 ] r1411t1 RAIL Ig - b i' J Industrial „. -a 1 , ro�lsn " N h5--ED11 'ark/Open Space I CPA-02-10 Mined Usee" J°w 'ark/O 1 en Space Sullivan Park :lv1�f Industrial Regional , �. Commercial .;',,,,74@.:4„,42 imp ....„„e,....:„.....,...._ goD ,. :00-...--.....--..-- ...... 44.,0),m,.. 4„,_, . liaftem...... 0 J an t ln�h: d1 v'1 Water Body Medium ,� r y 4/ 3 CH 4 E 7Il c r,„-,J/�, Park/Open Space Residential s+�a / '.> 1. , Mir p° i i mil ba �� - 11 --1‘,.„s \�� mi.ed Use 491/ thi..„ High ; aic4 nsit p, �„ /SSh= Shy I � �Jzll's�y b)diiInri nrou III 1 De met Low Density Residential �� =�.�/ji i 90 a1aldo �� v ��■■■■■ �" ,aa� .r, med......... . r�� f• Density - 1111■■ .. - vise ti N �� E �� , Residential p�� ■ M.lion OKI WPM m Mallon Mallon -'-_ imp t`�� CPA-02-10 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from P/OS to HI;subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from P/OS to I-2. • Exhibit 1 : Comprehensive Plan Map -ow.e ens , -•esi 1 en la - � � -+ ,. \�\\ Density esidential 111""1''. . Mew\�N•-:- <'® � . `■�fO Ty ,.' ■ o J A Residential %,,, ,. L•ight•Industrtal N ,N..1,RI S��1 ` „ -.0 , Corridor•Mixed Use ■� �)tt .S:k.N - '''‘.7 T'rent '''''''- Lffacal ..):§ft'a■N - aillillhaA Modell aloQ as kit.A _ i g, g t . ,.__._.-.__ I —� _ a a ��T3_- ° 4< �o6a9lhgfisF3 3 IIIlRftE3 tFraroaS:11I3 3 CPA-03-10 2 i re I ICommumtA .. ° I V m-M1 Ra C C C >ommercial a j i L tp3 tD I IlS D ii D Lum,, .. . ._ 1 D Industrial I I r ER3ezv Industrial Aiiial4m AiiMau Wallitl — — 1 CPA-03-10 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map City of Spokane Valley designation from CC to HI; subsequent zoning Community Development Department change from C to 1-2. • • 1 1 1 1 Attachment B 1 1 • • 2010 Proposed Text Amendments CPA-04- 10 Thru CPA-08- 10 Project Planner: Mike Basinger, Senior Planner, AICP e • Exhibit 1 Chapter 2 - Land Use • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 2.11 Goals and Policies Residential Goals & Policies Goal LUG-1 Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods. Policies LUP-1.1 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. LUP-1.2 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses and/or higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. LUP-1.3 Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments, accessory dwelling units and in-fill development. LUP-1.4 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian circulation. LUP-1.5 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space in and adjacent to residential areas. Open space dedication shall be proportionate to the size of the development. LUP-1.6 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees, bodies of water, vistas, and similar features) using site planning techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, transfer of development rights and lot size averaging. LUP-1.7 Allow zone changes within the Low Density Residential category only when specific criteria are met. Criteria may include: • Substantial changes within zone change area. • Clear mapping errors. • Adequate facilities and services (e.g. sewer, water capacity). • Consistency with densities in the vicinity of the zone change. LUP-1.8 Development agreements in conjunction with comprehensive plan amendments may be used where the project is larger in scope and has potentially larger impacts than normal, or where the city council may desire to place certain restrictions on proposal. LUP-1.9 Development agreements in conjunction with comprehensive plan amendments shall not be used to waive requirements associated with a proposed use. Goal LUG-2 Encourage a wide range of housing types and densities commensurate with the community's needs and preferences. Policies LUP-2.1 Allow and encourage a variety of housing types in designated Mixed-use areas, especially in the City Center area. LUP-2.2 Use design and performance standards for residential developments to achieve integration in commercial and Mixed-use developments. Performance standards should focus on scale, appearance, and compatibility. Encourage variations in facades and rooflines to add character and interest to multi-family developments. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 12-31-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 28 of 36 i City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan LUP-2.3 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to walking, biking and transit uses. LUP-2.4 Residential development should be designed to provide privacy and common open space. Open space areas shall be proportionate to the size of the residential development. LUP-2.5 Consider special development techniques (e.g., zero lot lines, lot size averaging, and planned unit developments) in single-family areas, provided they result in residential development consistent with the quality and character of existing neighborhoods. LUP-2.7 Consider and possibly implement programs facilitating purchase or retention of existing open space lands, such as transfer of development rights (TDR) or purchase of development rights (PDR). Commercial Goals & Policies Goal LUG-3 Transform various commercial business areas into vital, attractive, easily accessible mixed use areas that appeal to investors, consumers and residents and enhance the community image and economic vitality. Policies LUP-3.1 Encourage transformation of Sprague Avenue Regional/Community Commercial corridor into a quality mixed-use retail area. Retail development along the corridor, exclusive of the City Center, should be concentrated at arterial intersections and designed to integrate auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Integration of public amenities and open space into retail and office development should also be encouraged. LUP-3.2 Encourage large bulk retailers to locate in the designated Regional Commercial nodes around arterial intersections. LUP-3.3 Development agreements in conjunction with comprehensive plan amendments may be used to ensure compatibility between non-residential developments and residential zones by regulating height, scale, setbacks, and buffers. Goal LUG-4 Provide neighborhood and community scale retail centers for the City's neighborhoods. Policies LUP-4.1 Integrate retail developments into surrounding residential areas with attention to quality design and function. LUP-4.2 Encourage pedestrian and bicycle access to neighborhood shopping and services. LUP-4.3 Encourage retail and personal services to group together within planned centers to allow for ease of pedestrian movement. LUP-4.4 Encourage Mixed-use residential and commercial and office development in Neighborhood Commercial designations where compatibility with nearby uses can be demonstrated. LUP-4.5 Ensure compatibility between mixed-use developments and residential areas by regulating height, scale, setbacks, and buffers. Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 12-31-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 29 of 36 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan LUP-15.3 Establish and maintain relations with Native American tribes for the preservation of archaeological sites and traditional cultural properties. LUP-15.4 Publicize the community's heritage through interpretive trails, historic plaques, art and other public displays. Land Use/Transportation Connection Goals & Policies Goal LUG-16 Provide a street system that connects neighborhoods. Policies LUP-16.1 Encourage new developments, including multifamily projects, to be arranged in a pattern of connecting streets and blocks to allow people to safely get around easily by foot, bicycle, bus,or car. LUP-16.2 Develop street, pedestrian path and bike path standards that contribute to a system of fully connected routes. LUP-16.3 Require adequate emergency evacuation routes prior to approving new development or redevelopment. LUP-16.4 Connect neighborhood services, public open space and parks with multi-modal paths. Joint Planning Goals and Policies Goal LUG-17 The City of Spokane Valley should continue to coordinate with Spokane County and neighboring cities for adjacent urban growth areas. Policies LUP-17.1 The City should coordinate with Spokane County to ensure appropriate service provision and land development prior to City annexation. Methods to allow for coordination may include, but are not limited to, execution of an interlocal agreement between the City of Spokane Valley and Spokane County to: • Establish guidelines for development plan review, impact fees and SEPA mitigation; and • Define service delivery responsibilities, level of service standards and capital facility implementation consistent with the goals and policies of this Plan. LUP-17.2 Through regional planning efforts, the City and County should ensure that planning is compatible with the Cities of Spokane and Liberty Lake. LUP-17.3 The City should continue coordinated planning efforts between Spokane County, appropriate fire districts, school districts, and water service providers to assure managed growth in urban growth areas. Potential Annexation Area Goals and Policies Goal LUG-18 Identify Potential Annexation Areas for the City of Spokane Valley that are consistent with the Spokane County regional urban growth area boundary. Policies LUP-18.1 Within the existing urban growth area, identify potential annexation areas that are contiguous to the city limits and not assigned to another city. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 12-31-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 34 of 36 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan LUP-18.2 Coordinate with adjacent cities and Spokane County to review and update the regional urban growth area boundary consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies and RCW 36.70. LUP-18.3 Propose changes to the regional urban growth area boundary necessary to accommodate Spokane Valley's 20:-year population allocation. LUP-18.4 The City will not accept requests to annex unincorporated territory located outside the designated urban growth area. LUP-18.5 Complete necessary capital facilities planning for any newly proposed urban growth areas in accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies. Goal LUG-19 Collaborate with adjacent cities, Spokane County, and affected residents. Policies LUP-19.1 Pursue interlocal agreements with Spokane County to support collaborative joint planning within potential annexation areas to ensure consistent development. LUP-19.2 Inform affected residents, property owners, and businesses in the annexation process. LUP-19.3 Include language in an interlocal agreement utilizing the tool of annexation, prior to urban development, to control the type, quality, and location of development in potential annexation areas. LUP-19.4 Coordinate with Spokane County to work with affected neighborhoods upon annexation to provide a smooth transition from Spokane County to the City of Spokane Valley administration. Goal LUG-20 Promote orderly growth within potential annexation areas. Policies LUP-20.1 Perform a fiscal analysis and provide a service plan for all areas proposed for annexation. Lup-20.2 Incorporate potential annexation areas in the Capital Facilities Plan including proposed locations for new capital facilities. LUP-20.3 Strive to retain neighborhood integrity in adjusting potential annexation areas boundaries. Goal LUG-21 Develop an annexation process for potential annexation areas Policies LUP-21.1 Evaluate annexations within the potential annexation areas based on the following criteria: • The City's ability, either in house, by contract, or by special purpose district, to provide public services at the City's adopted level of service • The annexation boundary should provide a contiguous and regular boundary with current City limits • The annexation boundary, where appropriate should use physical boundaries, including but not limited to, bodies of water, existing or future right-of-way, roads, and topography • Assessment of staff time and expense involved in processing the annexation request Adopted Ap ril 25, 2006 (Updated 12-31-2009) Chapter 2—Land Use Page 35 of 36 • • Exhibit 2 Chapter 3 - Transportation i • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan TP-4.5 Reduce the amount of vehicle idling within the City through implementation of signal synchronization and driver awareness. Transportation System Management (TSM) Goals & Policies Goal TG-5 Extend the functional life of the existing transportation system and increase its safe and efficient operation through the application of TSM strategies. Policies TP-5.1 Implement traffic signal synchronization projects as the primary component onent of a TSM program. As funding permits, monitoring or traffic operation should be carried out to assure efficient timing of traffic signals. TP-5.2 Use Access Management measures, such as placing restriction on left turns across major arterial streets to reduce accident rates and extend capacity of major arterials. TP-5.3 Consider grade-separated railroad crossings where appropriate. TP-5.4 Ensure that pedestrians, bicyclists and the physically handicapped are taken into account when developing signalized intersections. Transportation Demand Management(TDM) Goals & Policies Goal TG-6 Encourage all Commute Trip Reduction affected and voluntary employers in Spokane Valley to achieve the CTR Act travel reduction goals. Policies TP-6.1 Encourage car-and van-pooling, telecommuting, flexible work schedules and other strategies identified in the CTR to reduce overall travel demand. TP-6.2 Use video-conferencinq and conference calling for off-site meetings where feasible. Freight & Goods Goals & Policies Goal TG-7 Provide for safe and efficient freight mobility. Policies TP-7.1 Discourage development of low-density residential development in close proximity to designated freight corridors and intermodal freight facilities. TP-7.2 Designate appropriate truck routes in the City of Spokane Valley. TP-7.3 Design designated freight corridors to improve traffic flow and freight mobility. TP-7.4 Disperse traffic throughout commercial districts rather than concentrating it on a single arterial. Goal TG-8 Adapt street and roadway design and facilities to manage traffic demand, address the need for freight movement, resolve traffic conflicts, and complement land use and urban features. Policies TP-8.1 Use the City's transportation system and infrastructure to support desired land uses and development patterns. TP-8.2 Allow for variety of services within neighborhoods that are convenient to and meet the needs of neighborhood residents, decreasing the need for driving. Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 3—Transportation Page 27 of 30 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Non-motorized Transportation Goals & Policies Goal TG-9 Enhance community livability and transportation by encouraging a connected system of pedestrian and bicycle ways that is integrated Into a coordinated regional network. Policies TP-9.1 Encourage non-motorized improvements which minimize the need for residents to use motorized modes by providing: 1) access to activity centers; 2) linkage to transit, park & ride lots and school bus routes; and 3) designating a network of streets that can safely and efficiently accommodate bicycles_ TP-9.2 eCoordinate development of the non-motorized system with surrounding jurisdictions and regional system extensions. TP-9.37 Provide sidewalks on both sides of all arterial streets as funding allows. TP-9.4 Incorporate pedestrian and bicycle features as design elements in the City Center. TP-9.51 Work with other agencies, particularly relating to regionally significant facilities to pursue funding for pedestrian and bicycle facilities. TP-9.6: Ensure that sidewalks, shared use paths and bike lanes are safe, clearly marked and well maintained. TP-9.7>- Include bicycle facilities where practical along arterial roadways. TP-9.8 Prioritize schools, parks, City Center, libraries and other civic destinations as non-motorized routes for the transportation network. TP-9.97 Include convenient and secure bicycle parking at major destinations and transportation centers. TP-9.109 Include pedestrian friendly facilities such as sidewalks (separated where feasible) in city street reconstruction and improvement projects, and require pedestrian friendly facilities such as sidewalks and/or multi-use trails in all new development. TP-9.11-1Y Reduce obstructions and conflicts between bicycle/pedestrian facilities and vehicular transportation routes. TP-9.1244 Develop street, pedestrian path and bike path standards that contribute to a system of fully connected routes for all transportation choices. TP-9.134 F-uture-planning-should include--Develop an integrated Bicycle Master Plan that defines the goals and design elements for bicycling in the City. TP-9.14 Increase the percent of total miles of bike lanes in the City. TP-9.15a The design of-ifntercestionc and-lrrtcrchang—sfral-Accommodate bicyclists, pedestrians and the physically handicapped in the design of interchanges and intersections in a manner that is safe, accessible and convenient. TP-9.163 The City will-w=Work with the CTR Program to provide incentive programs and develop facilities to encourage employees to bicycle to work. Transit Goals & Policies Goal TG-10 Support the provision of a safe, efficient, and cost-effective public transportation system. TP-10.1 Work with STA to ensure that transit shelters, bus benches and other amenities that support transit use are provided in appropriate locations for users of the system. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 3-Transportation Page 28 of 30 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan TP-10.2 Work with STA in planning and developing safe and efficient bus loading and unloading points. TP-10.3 Support the continued planning and development of other transit options, including but not limited to a high-capacity transit system. TP-10.4 Encourage use of fuel-efficient vehicles in the public transportation system. Goal TG-11 Encourage land uses that will support a high-capacity transportation system. Policies TP-11.1 Ensure that street standards, land uses, densities and building placement support the facilities and services needed along transit routes to make transit viable. TP 11.2 Work with STA to enure that transit elters, bus benches and other amenities that-support-transit use-are-provided-in appropriate-locations-for-users-of-the system. . .. ... • system. vi STA in planning -baY s on the-far-side-of intersections- TP-11.52 Work with STA to facilitate Neighborhood business areas should be-are served by transit-c-o nsistent-wi41-the-Transportahon-€lement. TP-11.C3 Ensure that Appleway Boulevard right-of-way is the minimum width necessary to accommodate future street and high-capacity transit improvements. Aviation Goals & Policies Goal TG-12 Support the expansion of general aviation and freight uses at Felts Field in accordance with the approved Airport Master Plan. Policies TP-12.1 Encourage the full development and utilization of airport properties at Felts Field. TP-12.2 Encourage commercial, educational and logistical support industry in close proximity to the airport. Goal TG-13 Encourage land use and development compatible with airport uses and regulated airspace. Policies TP-13.1 Enforce regulations protecting airspace from encroachment. TP-13.2 Discourage incompatible land uses and residential densities adjacent to the airport. Rail Goals & Policies Goal TG-14 Support and encourage the continued viability of the passenger and freight rail system in the region. Policies TP-14.1 Participate with other jurisdictions to facilitate safe and efficient rail systems. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 3-Transportation Page 29 of 30 Map 3.1. ...„fir MI IIMMILII■ -fibrrl,■■•• Tiriti........_,, Imi iv ,s =' h= Arterial Street Plan • r'y f , ---� '£ � `{ 0 I' p V` ■imoVtit++ Lam.. �- Li mlLI i j sii_ it = iiC U k1 —�" Legend i \/ R � F I Current sine oicalwn Spokane �� :-. 51«. '1 '1 ` i T ...."'....1111111111111r ..^W_ I. - SrrtcorFcdcral ]i a �, ., / `11112,-r ''F ',A. �' , usaa flf,44F 1 t r Principal Mcrial ■ tat.._ ..trwlr; `I ui,'s� ' f Minor Arterial 1;Ygy If -;:,�v,�w�11:. .1_ ,._s,•k.. r.. i��F�v24oal r. •or atwooe 'idr. --- i■Nal1FgM rr�l r�.�.r..-'�,/ +%o—til �..a %1 � J_ � ,. Y., - Cdlcctor ! ,,��.�y Yi51i u . 'f �� # ,110. I .. ''N Mr'y° `AX*,.... --- Proposal Prince pal Arterial gy41'3gt�. --- .,'"t•`�ye,��-10111.•,r �116J/I r!• 4111llnl41 w r .=.'�.,I� ^':�1 ___ Proposed Minor Arterial „/> '�. ...�"i@�1.� �n��l'i�rL'iL/Qy�i� 5�± --- Proposed Coucanr I®C .'Wit-. ��/jl �uE Ala , s-i=m . � da► Lake Railroad st 10.`041" .11 ltd:A M �UIRS IN L'��1L7�R+A!s!1� l �iE 77` ,w /, i 1117-4411111 _ •� . F1.12@i�tala\ IMM . �j Proposed Rwlyard °uj �i t�y I`5ia: �` w�slam IYiInH��ivi�ommws f� City of Spokane Vdlcy 1 I• • 1Af l7y Di-rD�e ::.tEr•W'�.lf4" ne�zaAWSE . MIT iE n >ti'�� ar, G+ Other Monidpalitis 1. „ _ . • I fill Aunts: �r:slttael.� .,�.'e �i��a� ��2>. �..� �?�—�f `/? , a� # r "b�j' -j Urban Growth Arm „ !dap_ k�N _ _ m a�� _ M' s �rtt M�1 �-',j� �� 41�1f�iCR ,",/ ~'.i1 ~Or, 00 WataBoa. 3e - . lip ms's—%. �;i4 •1 •: �� 1111 znININ 0►'Eng.'tam k' 6./ iiimikit r., , . - Arrarrr.V.. ..... 41 %far --*4 t -;715aEL''—w,..0iiix.t 01�� ;9 �. 1 u,. �i� ' l © n Map Location ■✓ a 1!a A. * I.,; 111 ,;r .31F►� �— C•�y/ 1� ° ' ^e -ii, 1````�L``��rJA=`�.'� ul= - �,I , '� • Effective Date:XXJa'rl�X•(i.7 G�. ■ 2 y '�*{ *"=�64� �' 1 Ordinance No.: n al tt ■S�# �,�[s ` 0 0.5 I 2 Miles -' Wl_ „, Nalre:7 e inlw�r■uiun shown on line n op is compiled/fion variant •e y / .nler.mdl,e.mh)re1/n VITUS,'n•,7snn.Mc(iNlnrdr..on clnwt+ W,(nnlnela shall Ow aYWGty nr enrrenynfWI Tap Mkt x Inn... - eapxml.laclanu hahlhtvfor rmrr and luw,cw,u rn it,Rnenc..r 5 �i, 7�a rinlinn xronrvcmlM thr('in•n 7 7anr4 f•4nime Valk),Gwpnirvn. rtt) 4 cement th-parunent,Mauan%Planstm.IS,NI v_1-1000 1: Jo �� ! / V P.a..raw(in of Vnlima n.14,nn.b.�r MM.n /r I N ,..., , .,_..�' ,f r 1L - v' v� tJ ��u Map 3.2 __� ,_r �0 Bike and Pedestrian idmie.....0 ... ....„.,....„„,--..r.i."--f .., i „,---. zrJ_ 5T ) _ a / 41 System,..„,,, ,, ,, ,,„,,, City of t� _� Ai Q � t am ,I46 "'' i ITX;"1-7"7"i i # + _ 1�I Legend • Spokane AA 1 4.,..„,„. B la �_.. ��.AA J 'ew`.,. L . Hl ippippm e sh r1.f.Park `i r \ Tf oicydc and Pedestrian System IM....ciat.Rocks, r••1)rrl I, 11c .sue�; • - - ,,t"� I rnt hh�1R11�-64a, w^ �„ f Shared Use Path xigPr' i1raiNii�r'111 �:: rr!r\.—.• — -,',,,,-9 7111, • ,r., i ..,.r �� •+ .s ' n Row �1 d.. .da Town of Molls wood _.��]-��- Proposed Shared Use Pam ��['n. ��L• =7 c ■ _ ,- V., a ,C , --.. as;u,..„ ® Bike last i' !+- k nom=m ' - /. Park tl rW�n.. ��.•-^' I l ', �� - ��I -- ,`� �. --•- Proposed Bikc lane L� r,y Park ' J �� ■ I�'--�iA■ „^,11 � �^. r_ ',.A IY! Bikc Lane/Proposed Shared Use Path ;_; i -", O�■L=G r r rk: _ _ a -��!;_ I • 'ME it 21 l?1 `�� signed Snared Roadway at +' ' IIA■■1!*!!r7 ■ • , VAtI,•v SenienC t-a /r . t CI Qr _ ,, .r- M. • .47�i'~ �� - I'7-' l-�, ........ Si Shared Roadway/Proposed Bikc . Af {I� r Libe rimed, ■` .f � . 191■�■t�11�L__ � � „ ..i� ii �.. L �'1(-r7��y4.A�19■�111s 1 w .9 ■��- lake Shared Roadway l I`N kr'rl^1 we�inliA1wi a:-ii t:�rLIP I; !• a •..Vii,: -0 ry L L--". ekis ■�L ■rrQQ■pp ��ryY � rya 'rte. —�•"• Pedestrian Path 4111/111 . r'�(I1� L Y .-;■,�`,y�,'''' ,�.�__ �AA1��11� Proposed Podr�Lnan Path \-,2.,............k �r Y..- /ti■' Bt1 kr..I`+�5{Yr��'a� with N 1,��1 11111111611141141 M�Ifld2 sir...- "y�,�+ `— 111 r�a� ® Tradhnds ` MIIIM r!r I "iLSE1.ke r r ' ,_i�i+�/ . y'.--n l-. •.- -I e 7.F. r.. `'"■ (nT --� Interstate 90•-lr " sump 4 CA 111�S�ri .19�11 0 _ • ( �,1 h j- .�..r(.r. .. Schools w_,..w,..�. t,l•• Ry w,Mr:�1r1Ot/tlr■I rvl„l�.0 r _ • m1 9� S! a•• '..'.-`I, Sa �p��r�r u��j P�`��/mj� \ .. ...--'- Railrmd r1• •---r- rnrl. D�.I,man tills. F i'M�■ [�/��fI/�s ■—_�_!�°�� 1'^�� `7 r Is��..-�k, ,rt '-.a 1—' -1 Other Mummpalihes " ��• ' _ �� W ,,�� ..a, +"� n City of Spokane Valley �� " � �e= = -^1;�Tc�. P rk; � _ �leVni ,L Urban Growth Aro n •I- V -(* 1�=�� '�� 11dfl' 1</ L t °,\ T ,_ Parks wil :a \r-., BEEB 1 =i ..A --.. Water Oodles -'I" _:,., },�cti Park `m I_ _. MIELI: I `y Map Location• r r;C .7 Y ^F 1 F,B'ectivc Date::.�/S'U!IX .'�J_,� h�J �,r, .,] a77 :;`'•"J „ Dr.lin:urce nu.:X..-�X �L Ai.\ Fr-,1 . PO ,,, ... ...,...Valk,- i i m ,, rI 0 0.5 I 2 Milts r�. �;' P ( , I• .. I It •' ` I , r t I r r , I 4 rn i ✓/ Illa•r Cnn.rnatinn �."{ ,—,/' " sL ••s' �� x I 7�he LnlvA � rtamare restore" 77,r(1n!'nuv rf ITnn`.Lr,m.. ('t'_ ��// ._ Morrow('nnservnrjnn nrti,nw afloat the n.rvrcxywrwrmntwoJllro map and y I nTnvh•rlc lmw,(ir,lid(rJurrmna rrN auvunsrn rcr n+nrrnn t'. /tY�./y�� • -^ '('n remAnn n•.vrmy nrHarr 4r Qry n/4wkrne Paltry.Crnurnrory ,,,+ `� n".m �� .e,� tknt,rrnrnefXprranrne fhnn.nnfYlrAMrrit.r'N1':1-/(NRi A— I -i I `�a..N n.akal.r. mt.a Mpakwo V.M,cs..mrn nr..`n..r rrra-..+ i ii'+'° ,_, a r ',. .... Map 3.7 � Local Access �. .�,6 Ed ;1 �J�'yI FA„.. -: _ Street Plan I city of �t. �e ilhi,'`�li:,, e .. Spokane 7 - rElln...� .+*' gismii, iii'.`.�i01..:.•Ali Legend / :}p;L �� ' twiiil�iiii..'-. ,1� ...er platted Right-of-Way :i�llIIl/hIa" �- We_ ww'�:i: • • Exhibit 3 Chapter 4 — Capital Facilities and Public Services ! • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Public Safety - Fire and Police Goal CFG-3 Provide police protection efficiently and cost effectively to Spokane Valley residents. Coordinate with fire districts to ensure adequate fire protection and emergency services for Spokane Valley citizens. Policies CFP-3.1 Encourage inter-jurisdictional cooperation among law enforcement agencies and fire districts to further develop, where practical, shared service and facility use. CFP-3.2 Develop a comprehensive emergency management plan that meets the needs of the City and coordinates with regional emergency planning efforts. CFP-3.3 Require adequate emergency vehicle road access and water supply/pressure for new development within the City. CFP-3.4 Encourage property owners to create a defensible space between structures and adjacent fuels and require that fire rated roofing materials are used on buildings in forested areas. Water and Sewer Goal CFG-4 Plans for water and sewer service should be consistent with the SVCP. Policies CFP-4.1 Review water and sewer plans to determine consistency with anticipated population growth, future land uses, comprehensive plan land use policies and development regulations. CFP-4.2 Coordinate sewer planning with appropriate jurisdictions for consistency with the SVCP. CFP-4.3 Support continued planning for domestic water needs in partnership with water purveyors, the Joint Aquifer Board, Washington State Department of Health and the Washington State Department of Ecology. CFP-4.4 Encourage public and private efforts to conserve water and to provide public education regarding the safe and appropriate use of the waste treatment system (i.e., NOT using drains and toilets for pharmaceuticals, grease, diapers, etc.). CFP-4.5 Discourage new, private domestic wells within the Spokane Valley City limits. CFP-4.6 New development must connect to public sewer and water. CFP-4.7 Consider grey water re-use and rainwater harvesting technology when and where appropriate and feasible. CFP-4.8 Encourage use of less water-intensive, native vegetation where possible. Solid Waste Goal CFG-5 Promote the reduction, re-use and recycling of solid waste. Policies CFP-5.1 Establish a City Hall recycling program to present a positive example of civic and environmental responsibility. CFP-5.2 Participate in updates to the Spokane County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management plan and support its implementation. CFP-5.3 Work toward reducing waste at City-sponsored events through the provision of recycling canisters and other means. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 9 of 72 f w • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan CFP-5.4 Provide links to reduction, re-use and recycling information on the City web site. CFP-5.5 Encourage the recycling of construction site waste. Stormwater Goal CFG-6 Ensure the provision of stormwater facilities and related management programs that protect surface and groundwater quality, prevent chronic flooding from stormwater, maintain natural stream hydrology, and protect aquatic resources. Policies CFP-6.1 Require stormwater management systems for new development. CFP-6.2 Create and implement a stormwater management plan to reduce impacts from urban runoff. CFP-6.3 Best management practices should be utilized to treat stormwater runoff prior to absorption of runoff into the ground. CFP-6.4 New development should include the multiple uses of facilities, such as the integration of stormwater facilities with recreation and/or open space areas, when possible. CFP-6.5 Encourage the use of alternatives to impervious surfaces, including permeable pavers, pervious pavement, subsurface drainage chambers and garden roofs. CFP-6.6 Consider programs limiting the use of herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers containing phosphates or other harmful chemicals. Library Service Goal CFG-7 Promote efficient and cost effective library service to Spokane Valley residents. Policies CFP-7.1 Encourage continued free, reciprocal library services among all libraries within the Spokane region. CFP-7.2 Land use regulations should allow siting of library facilities in locations convenient to residential areas. CFP-7.3 Work collaboratively with the Spokane County Library District to develop long- range library plans consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Schools Goal CFG-8 School sites and facilities should meet the education needs of Spokane Valley citizens. Policies CFP-8.1 Develop land use designations that allow new schools where they will best serve the community. CFP-8.2 Consider the adequacy of school facilities when reviewing new residential development. CFP-8.3 Assist school districts in their planning processes. CFP-8.4 Encourage educational and vocational institutions to develop programs that will result in local employment opportunities for graduates. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 10 of 72 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan CFP-8.5 Coordinate with school districts to use school facilities as community centers where appropriate. Concurrency Goal CFG-9 New development shall be served with adequate facilities and services at the time of development, or within the time frame consistent with state law. Policies CFP-9.1 Implement a concurrency management system for transportation, water and sewer facilities. Financing Growth Goal CFG-10 Consider a variety of revenue sources and funding mechanisms including, but not limited to, impact fees. Policies CFP-10.1 Identify and pursue sources of revenue for financing public facilities. Essential Public Facilities Goal CFG-11 Collaborate with all Spokane County jurisdictions in determining the best locations for public and private essential public facilities. Policies CFP-11.1 Follow the process for siting essential public facilities as set forth in the Spokane County Regional Siting Process for Essential Public Facilities. Potential Annexation Areas Goal CFG-12 Provide capital facilities to serve and direct future growth within the City of Spokane Valley Potential Annexation Areas Policies CFP-12.1 Plan and coordinate the location of public facilities and utilities in the potential annexation areas CFP-12.2 Considering, in advance, property acquisition opportunities for future facilities including but not limited to parks, police facilities, stormwater facilities, 9 p . p greenbelts, open space, and street connections CFP-12.3 Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions in developing capital improvement programs and studies addressing multi-jurisdictional issues 4.4 Capital Facilities Plan 4.4.1 Introduction The Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) provides an analysis of the facilities and services required to support the future land use and growth projected in the Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes a six year capital projects and a financing plan for facilities provided by the City. The finance plan identifies specific revenue sources that the City reasonably anticipates will be available in the year the project is scheduled to be constructed. The CFP includes Level of Service (LOS) standards for each public facility or service and requires that new development be served by adequate facilities. The purpose of the CFP is to use sound fiscal policies to provide adequate public facilities consistent with the land use element and concurrent with, or prior to, the impacts of development. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 11 of 72 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 4.4.2 Growth Assumption On November--30-2-004June 9, 2009, the Spokane County Board of Commissioners (BoCC) approved a Spokane Valley's requested population allocation of 266618,746 people for the City of Spokane Valley. The allocation is the amount of people the City can accommodate within its current municipal boundary. In addition, the BoCC approved a population allocation of 8,138 people for the unincorporated Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) adjacent to the City of Spokane Valley. Spokane-alley-seesikers this an "interim" allocation until wastewater tfeatment-oapaoity--issues are ceselve4--Because Spokan- • - - - - -= est an allocation outside of itc City limits, facilities required to serve Urban-Gfewt-h-Ar-eas-a-Elj=asent to the City ace-not analyzed in--this-pia -ece °roes are under the jurisdiction of SpokaRe-G-au-Rtyi-therefore, oThe City of Spokane Valley has identified the adjacent UGAs as Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). The City has identified existing service providers to help determine the effects on existing levels of service in the event of annexation. Capital facilities planning activities within these UGAs ;i4•: -continL:econtinue to be the County's responsibility. The following population data is used for capital facilities planning purposes: Table 4.4 Population Projection Year 20082009 204-22015 242-52031 Population 8-81-9-2089 440 02,24393,854 10'5,t376106 720 4.4.3 Level of Service Cities are often defined by the quality of facilities and services that are provided to its residents. Good road, sewer and water infrastructure are typical criteria used by businesses considering relocation. Park and recreation facilities are increasingly used to judge the quality of a City. Businesses want to locate where they can attract the best employees, and quality of life issues are often the deciding factor for a person to move to a new area. Level of service standards are quantifiable measures, such as acres of parks per 1000 people, or the amount of time it takes to travel a road segment during peak morning and afternoon "rush hours," the higher the level of service the higher the cost. This element establishes levels of service which will be used to evaluate the adequacy and future cost of urban facilities and services. 4.4.3 Concurrency The Growth Management Act introduces the concept of concurrency, which requires new development to be served with adequate urban services at the time of development, or within a specified time thereafter. The GMA allows six years for necessary transportation improvements to be constructed as long as a financial commitment is made at the time of development. The GMA strongly encourages concurrency for water and sewer, and it is good public policy to require the same. 4.4.4 Financing Facilities and Services The City is limited in its ability to finance all desired capital facility projects. Options must be available for addressing funding shortfalls or decisions must be made to lower levels of service for public facilities. In deciding how to address a particular shortfall, the City will need to balance current needs versus future growth requirements; existing deficiencies versus future expansions. Capital facilities plans must be balanced. When funding shortfalls occur, the following options should be considered: a. Increase revenues, b. decrease level of service standards, c. decrease the cost of the service or facility, d. decrease the demand for the service or facility, Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 12 of 72 • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan e. or some combination of the above. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 13 of 72 I S • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table1,36-1f1 tersectio n-Level-of-S e ry iso-Ana lye is 2007- 20-1-1 2026 2486 2014 202-6 2-0-4-2 Intersection Count Cootie; filittgated Mitigated LOS LOS LOS P-r-ejoet L-OS± L_Gs! P., 4 4144-Sullivan 2004 Sigral 1-; g - _ 2 401/TNecotan 2005 4-way-stop A 4 6,4 i-Universily 2222 Siglat c 1 ,• 8th-i-Bowdish 2.`;, 2-way-stop 1..l : : • , 37, 47- 84-14-4-Gamallan :2:; 4-v,oy-stop P ... .. ;,• 81114-DiotInlan-Misa a,,'_,., 642i4E,; .. • . 6-th4-E-Verg-Feen .,!, 2 gth-I-MGDeflaki :..::• , 2 way-step l--.., L . C) 8th/Park a„..•; l?-way stop C 0. - - -1,:-.■ 84/Pines-(SR-2-7) a,T.-;; 2-wzi y:-..teip 5- ... l- ', fitil!Sullivan ',-,:-.,-,:-.• gig-Ial L , ,• •, „ --• - 12 81114--T-hiefoloo a-:;•,;Q 2-way-stop 0 :• ;. 4l.11 13 8111-/-Univeteity 2:_:3::', Signal 8 -4 40114-Adams 2-•:.2 1 4 way step A 46-1h-4-13owd4ell 240,..,- 4 way-stop 0 c, . , '',,. 4-01h I Dir,latnan-Mica 2004 Signal 8 1.! -1-6-04-1--Evocgrean 2003 s4p,a4 a ,-. 4-3 46th l Mc-Ber+atel 2045 4-way-64.7,77- B ' _ _ ;:': 40 16th!SR 27 2005 Siafial 8 ,. .• 22,12 20 lath I SutI 4414 gi..344e-i '2, :. •• 16th l U-nriver-sity a•--:-,; a„:-.J•-•-.4 13 :-. „... - • Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 43 of 72 1 0 • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table-4:26-1nterseetion-Level-of-SeFvioe-Analysis 201-1 2007- 2026 ao-6 2r.,,m 2426 2042 I nterseetien Gewat Central Mitigated Mitigated LOS 1.01.; LOS Projeot LOS* LOS! 2-2 24U-/ vecgceen 2000 4 w3y st4p A .,, P F 30 23 24th-ASuilivan 2044 82g-F4, F; .. , 24 32nd-I-Adaias 2001 2-way-stop 2:5 3221d4-B-afkef 2003 2-way stcp GQUNTY C-4.41.1 ," 26 32nd/BOWEti-5-h 2005 84n-al 8 i., 1 . :. 24 24, 32nd44)isilinan-Mien 2202 2 way-&-top ft T. _ . . 25' 32nd I Evaegreen 2902 2-way44sp 2: , 2-- . ast 32-nd-APines 2005 8- a; C 40 32-n44-SR-2-7 2205 Sign-i=; c 32ne-ASellivan 2004, 24,,,a-y- top COUNTY- -.•-. -- 22 32-nd44iniversity 2405 ss4.9:-....:.; 1'; ;.- :-. 23 Applolaay 1 B2rkef 2005 &igc,-..; A :' - '" : . " 1,-3.0,24 24 ApplewaylOishinan 2005 Signal c , ,. , .. Misa 35 Appieway-l-Facc 2005 8i9r-,:=4 i-‘, 6 24 Appleway/Paf-Ic 200-5 Sic c. .---'- Appieway-1-T- an 2225 isigf 2) 1-: , , . 32 Applom.-iy I Linivecaity 2225 Sigml G ;-. t- 39 ApMeway 1 ViSta 2405 Sign-a; 0 :.. .. 10 13coadway4-Adatas 200.0 2.,,,,,y4 , 0 L ' , C 41 8ceadway,1-Argenne 2004 :•.: : 7-! A A 42 13readway-I-Bowdisb ;i:..:.!--•: =_-; ,-,..;! A ... . . c; Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 44 of 72 1 0 0 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan I Table-4,24411-terseetien LeYel-ef-Servie-e-Analysis 2007- 201-4 2426 2-00-6 2044 2626 2-0-1-2 Inter-section 80Wit Goat-red Mitigated LOS L-OS Locs; Mitigated projc.ct 4-3 aroadWay-/--E-Yefg-Feers ;r:...; C. 13 17 C. --.. filiteadway/Panther . • 4; Broadway 1 flara ;,:'..: 2-way stap c , s.' - - -- . ,,.. ' 4-.--, Broaciway4MG,Dariald ..-.--: '--.. 8.,g-s-a-1 8 . 4' 8FO3dway/M-14[1an POO?, 8.4,3n-al B .. ., .-_, Breactway-/-Paric 2023 8izr,a1 0 r.:' (1 . greadway4-Pines ,, 40 2000 8:-g-n-s4 I 1: r.,. , - (SR 27) . 6-o Bteadway/Stritivan 200; S,-g-r--., 0 :,, . „ , 41 Broadway/TilieFitian 2000 6:443,1-3', T. r - _ 42 titoad-way-I-Univereity 2002 ,S..414-3-1 i', . , 8 .. . 1 ' 6-2, Pteatiway-I-Visia 2002 S;gr....-,.! A .. c , ,. greatiway-I-Wal Mart 2000 84-g+1:11 i... :-, - _ Geritral Pre P.lix/ 200.'-! 8,in,a1 g Sullivan Dishman-Mica/ ., ,.. &anal 1-; C . , 1.30.•;dich Dishrrian-Mie-a-i , 8 . .. University Schafer !.-. • Ette-titi-(nsith)I B2fkOF 2002 2-wa,,,64op 8 1,-, i, ,---., E-Krki-(&0+.ith)--/-8arl:44 C-:,;-..; 2-w-ay-s-le-p 8 .. .. ., i-:.:- &Kid/Rota-01-04R) 20-0; 2-way.,:t.sp 8 . .. - 64- Euclid IFIera-(south) ....:•-:,-.. 2 way-slop 8 1 • . 42 Euclid/Pack ;-,Oz..1-;•- 2-waH4-4,,p A _ 14 &tielitti-Sulliyart .. ,-,. G•--2,--?....- G 4. D 4. 32 . Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 45 of 72 1 S 0 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan ' Table 4.3G-Interseetien Level-ef-ServIee-Analysis 24 2007- 14 2-026 2006 2-014 2026 20-1-2 Inters-eat-ten Gent Gentrel Mitigated Mitigated pf*G4 LC.)-S LOS LOS LOSt LOS' # 64 Indiana-I Evergreen -s-kjila., 1,...., 0 0 65 Indiana I Mall East 0004 Si ' El ' '' , c•.- Indiana I Mal!West 2405 Signal is indiana-I-Mi-Faldeau 04 p., Pky Indiana I Pines-(SR- 2C,G,1 €4f/Pk,i1 2-73 p C;.. iaRa l SUPian 2 OG,5 €491,f,1 C. C. -r-T, 14ie-man-13-/-Seltivan 2003 &gpf_4 B cr: , . 34 . - Knox-I-Ar-genne 2004 &A-a4 i'..1 E._, 1G 2 MaciSfie4d-i-PiFISS 2-way , ,. :■1 . (SR 27) stap.W.g7,:e. J.: 7-3 Marietta I Sullivan ;-:•.::,-., ti- - ..- . , . i Mitabeau-Ricy-I-Rines 2 way 7• 2004 i: (SR-2-7) stap.'ci.glal 74; Mission/Adams 4-020 2 way stop 2 ;-. ;'... M15-21Gri-i-ArgOKIne 2205 S49na., '., . - , 2.%T.:.y . tAIssien-I-BarkeF 0004 I.; ;. ,-. i"- step,tegnal /,.. Mi-5640/14-BOWE4S-h 4902 2,..yay-E4ep c ;,-. C. Missioni-E-ver-gceen 2002 049Ra4 A A ... :- MiS-;,- 1 I McDonald 2000 gireaal A i... ... 21 Mission/Mulan 2435 E-igaii: 1.; 7. 22 Mission-I-Pack 2002 S;9,-,^4-31 g •• .. 10 — . 2-3 IAA /Pines 2002 €,-1-g4 g ;...i 7., C- 2-2 g-', Mission/Sullivan 202-0 Si9a-al 0 :,-_. i2 - Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 46 of 72 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table-4:36-k ecsectton-L-evet-of-Sewise-Analysts 3007 044 200 2014 '2 2026 2026 20 lntcrsectien Count Gentrol Mitigated iYtitigated LOS LOS 4.0S* L-OS L-OS, Prole-GI ti -_ Mission-I-llniveraity 2-way-& p E - - _- Pr"rCHtg�3l�lePf-1 22, <;r=t _ - - ,. -. Argenne Menigenncry/ - - Shopping-Canter 5 (3 vers+le y / 2-way-t-4sp 0 0 - _ Rutter/Park 2 way 0.4p F 5. - _= Saltese/Sullivan 2-Wayap - 0 Sprague-/-Adams &F3! Sprague-/-Appleway Ave - Sprague-l-Argonne 2~^.05 - - - • - e4 Sprague/Barker 2C75 4-way-stop 8 - ,. 05 Sprague/flowdish 2905 c c Sproguo/CocleO (east-et-6arna#an)) 47;0• Spragcro i-Eyeigrean 2CCc C? c Spragua/FanCl}er 2 a'? - Sprague/Farr 2405 ,•-. - -1-0.-f_, Sprague/Flera .3800 t- C r: 404 Sprag J-Gillis- 2894; __ C i. r 4-52 Sprague/McDonald 2400 = - _ C. C 440 Sprague/hlu4an 200: _ , C - E- 454 Sprague/Park 20017: - c _ 4 t, . Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 47 of 72 0 • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table-4Intersestien-Level-of-Servise-Analysis 2007-- 2044 2020 2006 2044 a2s 204-2 littersestien Gount Control Mitigated Mitigated LOS LOS LOS P-refeet LOS± LOW # _ 40.0 Sprague-I-Pines-(SR- 2035 ..S.i.; -; P F. G I, P 6,22 2 ) -40; Sprague/Progress 2045 &Fat ;-:: ,. ' _ :, . ,, 34 40.7 Spfa,gue4-Sallivan 2000 Silet,J ri : c . . . 1 Ca SAFagtle-/-ThieffIlan 23i3 T. 1-2iarl-31 t; :. . . - 449 SPFag tie/UrfiVefSitY 2 -,.-----. EIT---:al t.- G S 440 Sprague/Vista 2C30 ,S.bgpa CI 444 Trent(srt 200)4 2,?-0-4 gianat 0 . . Argen-ne Trent-(SR-200)4 r. 442 2;04 2--wa-y-e44p I, .. . . ;-:,.,,,: C.-TV Barker Trent(SR 200)/.1 13 200:1 844a1 ,. .. • . P,,efficee-F1 Trent-IcSR 200)/ .. ... ' , ,. Fanc-her 444 Trcnt(SR 200)/Flora 2003 2 way cc) !" .„ , i". 11:1-11 440 Trent(SR 200)/Pleirli4 2;03 Ei-p-?•J 41 -,. ' ,, .. B 0,4111/ Trent-(SR-200)4 447 200-3 Sig431 E 22,41-TV Pines ' I Trent-(SR-2,00)4 448 '2. 2‘y:•.y stsp C .. .. E . Rrogres-s 440 Trent-(SR-290)4 r. titter Linivereity Rewrays4 Trent-(SR 200)I 120 2-3;:5 •I:gi--,•4 ,:, 1_ , 0 33 Sullivan-(Nost14-Rentp) Tsent-(SR 200)4 Sulliyan(Seutit-Rantp) 122 Trent-(SR 200)/Vista 2003 4.1'gri:.= C 1. ti4 V 123 WeBes-ley4-Evewee4I 2:S.,:.:::. 4.-way-€4€:...p. .• . . . ._ , .. ., - 424 Wei-le6ley 1 Progress 3 -1 I.way step C , - .. 125 lAtelie6-10-y4-S1418Va14 ;'-.'_' 4 way s-tap C r . , . :" : 4., ',J.,-_, Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 48 of 72 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table-4:36-interseetlon Level-of-Service Analysts 2414 3026 2047- late-meet-ion Geunt Gontrel 2 Mitigated late-meet-ion LOS LOS LOS LOS' LOS` i -4a?..a,--Seo Table-4 3&k-r-alist;nget-capita!-irrproyern:Rt prz.}es s, Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis 2014 2030 2010-2015 2008 X2014 2030 Intersection Count Control LOS LOS Mitigated LOS Mitigated Protect LOS LOS identifier 2007 4-way stop A A A 4th/Adams 2 t p _ 4th/Bowdish 2007 2-way stop D D - E _ - 4th/Carnahan EST-2008 2-way stop A A _ A _ - 4th/Dishman Mica EST-2008 2-way stop C D _ D _ - 4th/Evergreen 2006 2-way stop E E - F _ _ 4th/Farr EST-2008 2-way stop B B _ B - _ 4th/McDonald 2007 2-way stop C D F _ 4th/Park 2008 2-wav stop B C . F - 4th/SR 27 EST-2008 2-way stop D D _ E - - 4th/Sullivan 2007 Signal B B B _ 4th/Thlerman 2007 4-way stop A A _ B _ - 4th/University 2008 Signal B B B _ _ 8th!Adams 2007 4-way stop A A - A _ _ 8th/Barker 2005 2-way stop B B - C_ - - Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 49 of 72 0 • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis 2014 2030 2010-2015 2008 2014 2030 Intersection Count Control LOS LOS Mitigated LOS Mitigated Protect LOS LOS Identifier 8th/Beaman EST-2008 2-way stop C C C _ _ Bowdish 8th/Bowdish EST-2008 2-way stop C D D D D TWLTL from 8th-32nd 8th/Carnahan 2005 4-way stop B B _ F - 8th/Dishman Mica 2008 Signal B B _ B 8th/Evergreen 2006 Signal A A _ A _ _ 8th/Farr 2007 2-way stop B B _ C - _ 8th/McDonald 2007 2-way stop C D _ F - 8th/Park 2008 2-way stop B B _ E _ _ 8th!SR 27 2001 2-way stop C D _ E _ _ 8th!Sullivan 2007 Signal B B _ B _ _ 8th/Thierman EST-2008 2-way stop C C . C - _ 8th/University 2008 Signal A A _ A _ 16th/Adams 2008 4-way stop A A _ A _ _ Bowdish 16th/Bowdish 2008 4-way stop B C C D C TWLTL from 8th-32nd 16th/Carnahan EST-2008 2-way stop B B _ 3 _ - 16th/Dishman Mica 2004 Signal B B _ C _ - 16th/Evergreen 2006 Signal A A _ A _ _ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 50 of 72 0 0 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis 2014 2030 2010.2015 2008 2014 2030 intersection Count Control LOS LOS Mitigated LOS Mitigated Protect -- LOS — LOS Identifier 16th/McDonald 2008 4-way stop A A _ C _ 16th/Pines 2008 2-wav stop E F A F B TBD' 16th/Saltese EST-2008 2-way stop B B _ B - 16th/SR 27 2008 Signal C C A E B TBD"• 16th/Sullivan 2004 Signal B B _ C - - 16th/University 2009 Signal B B _ C _ _ 24th/Adams 2007 4-way stop A A A _ 24th/Blake EST-2008 4-way stop A A _ A - _ Bowdish 24th/Bowdish 2007 2-way stop C C C C C TWLTL from 8th-32nd Evergreen 24th/Evergreen 2008 4-way stop A A A B A TWLTL from 16th-32nd 24th!McDonald EST-2008 2-way stop B B _ B _ _ 24th/Pines EST-2008 2-way stop B B _ B - 24th/SR 27 2007 2-way stop C C _ E _ - 24th!Sullivan 2008 Signal B C C - _ 24th!University EST-2008 2-way stop A A _ A _ _ 32nd/Bowdish 2005 Signal B B B B B _ 32nd 1 Dishman Mica EST-2008 2-wav stop B B - B _ - Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 51 of 72 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan I Table 4.36 intersection Level of Service Analysis 2014 2030 2010-2015 2008 2014 2030 Intersection Count Control LOS LOS Mitigated LOS Mitigated Protect LOS -- LOS Identifier 32nd/Evergreen EST-2008 2-w ay stop B C C C E _ 32nd/Pines 2005 Signal B B _ C _ _ 32nd/SR 27 2005 Signal B C _ E _ 32nd/University 2005 Signal A B B _ _ 44th/Schafer EST-2008 4-way stop A A _ A _ Appleway /Barker 2005 Signal C D _ F _ - Appleway /Dishman Mica 2008 Signal B B _ B _ Appleway /Farr 2008 Sgnal A A _ A - _ Appleway /Park 2008 Signal B B _ C _ _ Appleway /Thierman 2005 Signal D D _ F _ _ Appleway /University 2008 Signal B B _ B _ Appleway /Vista 2008 Signal A A A _ _ Blake/SR 27 EST-2008 2-way stop B B _ B _ - Broadway/Adams 2005 2`way st p D D _ E _ _ Broadway/Argonne 2008 Simla! B B _ D - _ Broadway/Barker EST-2008 2-way stop B B _ B - - Broadway/Bovxlish 2005 Signal A A A - _ Broadway/Conklin 2009 2-way stop C C _ E - _ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 52 of 72 0 0 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis 2014 2030 2010-2015 2008 2014 2030 Intersection Count Control Mitigated Mitigated Project LOS j..OS LOS LOS LOS Identifier Broadway/Evergreen 2005 Signal D P. _ D _ _ Broadway/Fancher 2007 Signal C C - A _ Broadway/Farr EST-2008 2-way stop C C - C - _ 4 Roundabout Broadway/Flora 2008 2-way stop C F A F B Moore to Flora Broadway/Heacox 2009 2-way stop C C _ P _ _ Broadway/McDonald 2005 Signal A A _ A _ - Broadway/Muilan 2008 Signal B C _ D _ _ Park Road Broadway/Park 2008 Signal D D C F D Broadway- Indiana Broadway!Pines 2005 Signal C C _ C _ _ Broadway/Sullivan 2007 Signal C C _ C - _ Broadway/University 2007 Signal A A _ A _ _ Broadway/Vista 2007 Signal A A _ A _ _ 4 Broadway/Yardley 2006 2-way stop B B _ C _ Buckeye/Park EST-2008 2-way stop A B _ B _ - Buckeye/Vista EST-2008 2-way stop B B _ B - _ Dishman Mica/Bowdish 2005 Signal B B _ C _ Euclid/Park 2005 2-way stop B B _ B _ _ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 53 of 72 • S City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan I Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis 1 2014 7.030 2010-2015 2008 2014 2030 Intersection Count Control LOS LOS Mitigated LOS Mitigated Protect LOS LOS Identifier Euclid/Sullivan 2006 4-way Stop C C C - - Euclid-West/Barker 2004 2-way stop B B _ E _ - Euclid-East/Barker EST-2008 2-way stop B B _ B - _ Euclid-West/Flora 2007 2-way stop B B _ B _ - Euclid-East/Flora 2007 2-way stop B B _ C - - Indiana/Evergreen 2009 Signal B B _ B - Indiana/Mirabeau 2009 Signal A B - B - _ Knox/Argonne 2008 Signal C C - D _ Knox/Vista EST-2008 2-way stop B B _ B _ Mansfield/Mirabeau 2009 2-way stop C C .. C _ Mansfield/Pines 2008 Signal C C _ D _ _ Mirabeau/Pines 2008 2-way stop F F A F B Install Signal Mission/Adams 2005 2-way stop B B _ B - _ Mission/Argonne 2005 Signal B B _ C _ Mission/Bowdish 2005 22 way stop D D - E _ Roundabout Mission/Flora 2009 2-way stop A F A F A Indiana Extension Mission/McDonald 2006 Signal A A _ A _ - Mission/Mission Conn. 2008 2-way stop B C _ C _ Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 54 of 72 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis 2014 2030 2010-2015 2008 2014 2030 Intersection Count Control Mitigated Mitigated Protect LOS LOS LOS LOS LOS Identifier Mission/Mullan 2005 Signal B B _ B _ Park Road Mission/Park 2006 Signal B C B D C Broadway_ Indiana Mission/Pines 2007 Signal D D _ E _ _ Mission/Sullivan 2005 Signal B B _ B _ _ Mission/Thierman EST-2008 2-way stop B B _ B - _ Mission/University 2008 2-way stop C D _ F - _ Mission Conn./Evergreen 2007 Signal A A - A _ _ Montgomery/Argonne 2008 Signal D D D E D Argonne 1-90 to Trent Montgomery/Mansfield 2008 RDB A C _ C _ - Montgomery/University 2007 2-way stop C D _ E _ Rutter/Park 2003 2-way stop B B _ C _ _ Saltese/McDonald EST-2008 4-way stop A D _ E Saltese/Sullivan 2008 2-way stop C F B F B Install Signal Schafer/Dishman Mica 2008 Signal B B - F - _ Sprague/Adams 2008 Signal B B _ B _ _ Sprague/Applewav 2006 Signal A B _ B _ _ Sprague/Argonne 2008 Signal B B _ B _ _ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 55 of 72 • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis 2014 2030 20102015 2008 ,2014 2030 Intersection Count Control LOS LOS Mitigated LOS Mitigated Protect LOS — LOS Identifier Sprague/Barker 2008 4-way stop A F B F C Install Signal Sprague/Bowdish 2008 Signal C C C Sprague/Conklin 2009 Signal A A _ A Sprague/Evergreen 2006 Signal C C _ C _ Sprague/Fancher 2007 signal D D _ D _ Sprague/Farr 2008 Signal A A - A _ Sprague/Flora 2005 Signal B B _ D _ _ i Sprague/1-90 WB On Ramp EST-2008 Signal A A _ A - _ Sprague/McDonald 2009 Signal C C _ D - ". Sprague/Mullan 2008 Signal B B _ B _ _ Sprague/Park 2008 Signal B B _ A _ _ Sprague/Pines 2008 Signal D D _ D Sprague/Progress 2008 Signal B B _ B _ Sprague/Sullivan 2008 Signal D D _ E - _ Sprague/Thierman 2005 Signal B B . B - _ Sprague/University 2008 Signal D D D - - Sprague/Vista 2008 Signal B B _ _ - Thorpe/Dishman Mica EST-2008 2-way stop B B - 13 - - Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Page 56 of 72 i • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis 2014 2030 2010-2015 2008 014 2030 Intersection Count Control LOS LOS Mitigated LO5 Mitigated Protect LOS LOS Identifier Thorpe/Madison 2007 2-way stop A A B _ _ Trent/Argonne 2008 Signal D D _ E _ Trent/Barker 2007 2-way stop D D _ F F/B West Trent TWLTL Trent/Evergreen 2008 Signal B B _ 8 BTV- Trent/Flora 2003 2-way stop E E _ F F Eliminate NB Movement Trent/McDonald 2007 2-way stop C D _ F _ _ BTV- Trent/Park 2008 final B B _ F B/C Reconfigure Intersection Trent/Pines 2009 Signal C D _ F _ _ Trent/Progress 2007 2-way stop C C _ E - _ Trent/Sullivan-N Ramp 2007 Signal A A _ A _ Trent/Sullivan-S Ramp 2007 Signal A A _ A _ _ BTV- Trent/University 2008 2-way stop C C _ _ - Eliminate Jntersection Trent/Vista 2008 Signal B B _ B _ Wellesley/Evergreen 2005 4-way stop A B _ B - _ Wellesley/McDonald 2009 4-way stop D E _ F - _ Wellesley/Progress 2007 4-way stop B B A C A Bigelow Gulch Bigelow Wellesley/Sullivan 2007 4-way stop C C B D C Gulch Install Signal Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 57 of 72 s • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis 2014 2030 2010-2015 2008 2014 2030 Intersection Count Control Mitigated Mitigated Proloot LOS LOS LOS LOS LOS Identifier State Controlled Intersections Broadway/Thierman 2009 Signal A A _ A - - Broadway/1-90 WB Ramp 2009 Signal A A - A _ - Broadway/1-90 EB Ramp 2009 Signal B B - B _ Argonne/1-90 WB Ramp 2008 Signal B B _ C _ Argonne/1-90 EB Ramp 2008 Signal B B _ C _ - Mullan/1-90 W8 Ramp 2008 Signal B B _ B _ _ Mullan/1-90 EB Ramp 2008 Signal C C _ C - - Indiana/Pines 2008 Signal D D _ E _ _ Pines/1-90 EB Ramp 2008 Signal C E _ B _ Evergreen/1-90 WB Ramp 2009 Signal C B _ B - _ Evergreen/1-90 EB Ramp 2009 Signal B B B - Indiana/Sullivan 2007 Signal C D _ D - - Sullivan/1-90 WB Ramp 2006 Signal B B . C - Sullivan/1-90 EB Ramp 2006 Signal E E - F _ - Indiana/1-90 WB Ramp 2006 Signal B B - B - _ Barker/1-90 WB Ramp EST-2008 Signal A F _ F - _ Barker/1-90 EB Ramp EST-2008 Signal B D E - - Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 58 of 72 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.36 Intersection Level of Service Analysis 2014 2030 2 15 2008 2014 2030 03 0 10.2 0 intersection Count Control LOS LOS Mitigated LOS Mitigated Protect — LOS LOS Identifier Note: See Table 4.38 for a listing of capital Improvement projects _ 'Includes volumes from Bigelow Gulch Road project _ _ _ - "intersection may be impacted by Appleway Extension project,but analysis was not completed due to uncertainty of ROW "'Improvement options are still under evaluation BTV:Bridging the Valley _ _ _ _ - - Regional Level of Service The Countywide Planning Policies require that LOS standards be adopted in accordance with the regional minimum level of service standards set by the Growth Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials. The Steering Committee approved the use of corridor travel time for use in establishing the regional transportation system. The Spokane Regional Transportation Council is determining annual average corridor travel time P 9 p 9 9 through a travel time study. This study is still in progress and corridor travel time Level of Service standards will be adopted upon its completion. Uses of Level of Service Standards As measures of transportation effectiveness, LOS standards can help jurisdictions identify where and when transportation improvements are needed, and when development or growth will affect system operation. Level of service provides a standard below which a transportation facility or system is not considered adequate. Level of service standards can be used to evaluate the impact of proposed developments on the surrounding road system. They can also be used to identify problems, suggest remedial actions and apportion costs between public and private sources. LOS standards are a cornerstone in the development of equitable traffic impact fee systems, which makes development pay some of the costs for improvements to the transportation infrastructure. The Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) performed traffic modeling for the urban area, considering future population growth and distribution. This model examines the performance of the entire urban transportation system. Improvements to provide for the increased traffic volumes shown by the model at the adopted level of service standards, are included in this plan. More information on the transportation modeling based on future land use assumptions is contained in Chapter 3, Transportation. Relationship to Concurrency Management Concurrency involves matching public facilities and new development. The concept of concurrency predates the Growth Management Act for some public facilities, specifically through SEPA mitigation requirements. The GMA extends concurrency to transportation facilities by requiring that new development be served by adequate roads and public transportation service, and that development is not permitted to cause these transportation facilities to operate below level of service standards that are adopted by local governments in their comprehensive plans. "Adequate capacity refers to the maintenance of concurrency" (WAC 365-195-835). __ Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 59 of 72 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan State Transportation Facilities The Growth Management Act requires local jurisdictions to include inventory and Level of Service information for state transportation facilities in their Comprehensive Plans. State facilities are divided into two categories: Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS), and Regionally Significant Highways (non-HSS). The Growth Management Act requires non-HSS facilities to be subject to concurrency. The following table lists State highways serving Spokane County.__State Transportation Level of Service The Washington State Department of Transportation Table 4.37 State Highways (WSDOT) requires state transportation facilities in urban areas (inside the UGA) to maintain a minimum Highway Description Designation Level of Service standard "D." In rural areas 1-90 Interstate HSS (outside the UGA), the minimum LOS standard is "C." Those areas lying outside the UGA that may SR-27 Pines Road Non-HSS have urban characteristics can be evaluated by the SR-290 Trent Avenue Non-HSS WSDOT in conjunction with the City on a case-by- - case basis to determine which standard is the most •HSS=Highway of Statewide Significance Non-HSS=Regionally Significant Highway appropriate fit. Intergovernmental Coordination Transportation plans were distributed for comment to all jurisdictions that may be impacted by, or impact, Spokane Valley's transportation system, including adjacent towns and cities, Spokane County, Spokane Transit Authority, Washington State DOT, and Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC). SRTC has overall responsibility for intergovernmental coordination of transportation plans. Each jurisdiction in the region must submit transportation plans to SRTC for inclusion in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan, SRTC responsibilities include: 1) Certifying the transportation elements of comprehensive plans adopted by the County, cities and towns in the region for consistency with the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; 2) Maintaining consistency between infrastructure plans and land use development plans, and 3) Reviewing LOS thresholds for transportation facilities in the Spokane Region. SRTC is also responsible for monitoring and evaluating the performance of regional transportation facilities as affected by land use and transportation improvement decisions. Concurrency management is linked to the planning process. Any amendments to the comprehensive plans require a concurrency management system analysis and must meet thresholds before their adoption. SRTC will annually assess the regional transportation system with respect to regional concurrency. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing Capital Projects Table 4.38 contains a complete list of transportation related capital projects for the years 2008 through 2013, totaling over$95 million. The City updates the six year TIP throughout the year as project priorities and funding changes. This Plan adopts by reference any updates to the TIP occurring between Plan update cycles. The current TIP is available for viewing online at www.spokanevalley.org. These projects address capacity issues at intersections and safety improvements. Following is a discussion of potential funding sources. Funding Sources Funding for the operation and expansion of the City's transportation system falls into several categories, which include federal, state and city funds. Some sources consist of reliable annual funds while others are periodic, such as grants. The use, availability and applicability of these various sources are not always at the discretion of the City. Spokane Valley will develop a track record with funding agencies as time goes on, which will help make to make more reliable funding assumptions. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 60 of 72 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan A summary of expected federal, state and local funding sources for the City's six year Capital Improvement Program is shown in Table 4.39. The following is a summary of transportation funding options. Federal Assistance These funds are authorized under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act for the 215` Century (SAFETEA-21) and are administered by the Federal Highway Administration through Washington State Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan Planning Organization (Spokane Regional Transportation Council). Federal funding programs include Bridge Replacement (BR), Congestion Management and Air Quality (CMAQ) and the Surface Transportation Program (STP). State Assistance The Washington State Transportation Improvement Board administers State transportation programs, including the Urban Corridor Program (UCP), the Urban Arterial Program (UAP), and the Sidewalk Program (SP). City Funds Spokane Valley contributes revenues from the General Fund and the Real Estate Excise Tax funds for transportation projects. The City also receives State Motor Fuel Tax and Restricted State Fuel Tax. t able 0 mix Ye +Fans-aeFtatien-Ga-p+tal Facilities and Financing Plan 2009 2014 (dollars in thousands) 2-808 Item Project ROM To Primary Ctty-Amount Total-Annual Seuree (4) Amount 8readway-Avenue-Safety Pines-Rd-((R-2-7) Park-Road UAP 4-87 930 Project -1 PinesiMansfield TPP 205 1,700 2 Sacker Road Bridge BR 2014 4,159 3 ApplewaylSprague'Dishrnan Interstate-00 Dishman-Mica CMAQ 30 373 Misa ITS STEP Paveback City -1,201 4600 Street P(eservaliea-Project— y 1,224 1,203 Various-Streets 4-80 it l�readwa�y-Avenue Mo�=ct of Para-Read UAP 1-2 00 7 Ap;:'eway-Bfvd University E-vergreen STP 4-2-1 037 W'SQ8T-U- are-Rame rejt - City 300 300 Breadway;Amgeane,Freya I/C 0 Pines'SFrague Intersection SSA 4-52 742 IaCC 4-0 44th-Ave Pathway Sands-to sands Woodruff ST-PR 44 32-8 V■loodru€f 4-1 Broadway-Avenue-Rehab#2 Rancher Read Thierrean-Road STP-01) 82 408 4-2 Pa' Broadway Avenue India e ST-R(U) 48 352 46 Sprague-Avg .ue-Resumfasing University Evergreen City 2,856 2466 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 61 of 72 • S City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 4-7 Lvergreen S ague {A IRterecctioR-PGG - .3 MGDonaki/Sprague .T Interscelion-PGG A Annual---Total $7,229 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 62 of 72 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 201 -. I Projost Fr m To Primary Ofty-Ameur Tetat-Annual Source (S) Amount STEP Pavebaek City 4,204 4499 , S Street Presecvatien-Pcojeet City 4,224 1,203 , 6 Broadway-Ave t t$t F;era-Road UAP 342 ,708 Moore 7 Appteway-Extension University Evergreen Other 206 2;859 Sullivan4Sprague-tntersestien STP(U) 446 864 PCC ( ) 44 I,4ansfiekt-S tension P-Ines-(SR-2-7-) Mir-abeam Prkwy UAP 207 4;036 Flora-Road Sprague Mission UAP 89 447 Park React-(Brldging4he Other 31 7-60 Valley) Federal 20 Sprague Resurfacing-#2 Evergreen Sullivan City 2,856 2;856 24 Sullivan-Rd-(P€Qnly) Eucli-1 Wellesley ST-PM 80 693 1Pndana/Su livan4ntersestiea ST-A 275 1,342 24 24 Brsadway:S&t;van lnlefsectien STA 253 1,220 PCC 26 Argonne-Read Interstate-98 CMAO 7-7 676 27 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 0 735 28 Broadway Avenue Flora UCP 63 344 2-9 Appleway-Theirrnan ES Lane C-MAO 1 3 26 Annual-Total 8-77026 481027 2011 its:;, Project From To Primary City-Amount Total-Annual Source ($) Amount 4 STE avebaeic City 4,284 4,389 6 -Street-Preservation-Project City 4,224 1,293 7 -Appleway-Blvd -University Evergreen UCP 448 7,734 44 Mansfield Extension l Pines Rd-(SR--2-7) Mirabeau Pkwy UAP 280 4448 45 Flora-Road Sprague -Mission VAP 288 4,487 49 Bark Road Bridging the Other Fedora: 90 2458 Valley 25 Argonne-Road interstate-90 -Tre=at CMAO 404 743 2-7 -Sullivan-RdVest-Bridge BR -0 -7-35 20 Broadway-Avenue Flora Barker UGR 60 250 2- Appieway Thurman-SB-lane CMAO 22 454 Zr t-Aissin-Avenue Flora Barker UAP 69 495 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities Page 63 of 72 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 46-• Schafer 31 C.t slhr,}an-Mi�ehab S4 P(P) 4L., -170C.) Bowdish Gity-44rnits 1 3-2 Saltese/S llivan-Signal Other 404 444 34 Pines-Corridor ITS Sprague Trent CMAQ -280 2,084 36 Barker-Road Appieway Broadway IMP 166 7-78 Annual-Total $-45-668 6-22;638 2042 Rem Pro}eet Rem To Prin.-:lry City To-tai-Annual # £ours-e Ametint{$3 Amount 6 Street-Preservation-Prefeets City 2;-264 2,392 46 t4oca-Road Sprague Mission UAP 218 4,3,37 49 Park-Road—Bridginglhe Other 286 6-809 Valley Federal 2-7 Sullivan-RoadWest-Brldge BR 0 4706 2-8 Broadway FioFa Barker UCP 6-66 282€ 30 Mission Rora Barker UAP 340 47784 36 Barker-Road Appleway Broadway UAP 280 4-445 36 Park-Read--#2-(GN-only) Broadway Indiana &TP(U) 2-70 2;000 37 32'1-Avenue Evergreen Best STP(U) 24 453 Evergreen/32` 4-6-' 32 33 STP(U) 403 623 Evergreen SR-2-7 39 Barker Road 6" App4eway UCP 74 374 Annual Total $-4,482 S 23,646 2013 Item Prejec'. Frem To Primary City-Amount Total-Annual # Source ($) Amount 6 Street-Preservation Projeet Oily 2,-239 2,391 Park Road—Bridging4he Other 49 Valley Federal 256 6,849 2-2 Sul-Ivan-Read—Extension Bigelow Gulch Oily 85 65 2-7 Sullivan-Read West Bridga BR 0 4,056 30 Mission-Avenue Flora Barker UAP- 310 -1,564 36 Barker-Read -Appleway Broadway UAP 480 942 3G Park-Read--#2-(GN-only) Broadway Indiana STP(U) 344 2,323 37 3214-Avenue Evergreen Best -STP(U) 24 176 1.6� 32'1 33 €vargreenl32ne -,S•TP(i4) 77.7. 3;681 Evergreen SR 27 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities Page 64 of 72 i 0 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 20 -3 Item Pfe)est From T-e Pfimary - City-Amount Total-Annual # Source (S) AmGtsnt 39 Barker-Read 8" Agateway MP 80 480 4-0 Euetid Wellccley STP(U) 460 800 42 Pines-Gorridor ITS Sprague 46'' CtrtAQ 4-06 786 43 S Indiana Etretide STP(P) 22 485 46 32"-Avenue-Rehab Dishinan-Mica SR 27 S-T-REP) 28 242 Ann+sal-Tetal $-4 688 $-241348 I -- 2011 - Item Pfe}est ROM To Primary C dam Ainoui:: Total-Annual # Source ($) Arnetrnt 6 Street Preservation-Project Gity 2,260 2,301 3-7 32'4-Avenue Evergreen Best ST-8(13) 05 7-03 39 Barker-Read 8" Appleway UGP d 400 27449 40 Sultivan-Read-(RaNI N-enty) Euclid ;Ate{slay STP(U) 645 2,725 43 ' Sullivan-Read-Rehab Indiana Euclid STP(P) -126 036 45 32"4-Avenue-Rehab Bistimen-Mica SR-27 STP(P) 162 4-308 46 8w City-L-knits STP(U) 32 234 47 Appleway-E4tension Evergreen Tehifley STP 113 834 43 Unw 45t 4' STP(P) 60 444 49 University-Read I lay 1 Dishman--Mica 4-5"' STP(P) 20 06 6-2 Park-Road--4l3 Sprague Broadway STP(U) 42 4-44 63 Barker-Read Spokane-River Trent STP(U) 44 303 Flora-Euclid Euclid 64 Euclid-Ave/Flora Road STP(U) 61 376 Euclid Flora Barker Amnual-Total 8-4.0G7 812,832 Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan 2010 (dollars in,thousandsl Item Project Description Primary City Total # _ Source Amount Amount 1 Barker Road Bridge, BR 55 ___ 407 2 Broadway Ave 180 ft E,of Moore to Flora UAP 68 __2,465 3 Park Road-#2(PE Ony)-Broadway to Indiana STP(U) 34 246 4 Broadway Avenue Safety Project-Pines(SR-27)to Park UAP 167 ___ 834 5 Indiana Ave Extension-3600'e/o Sullivan Rd to Mission&Flora UCP 264 1,874 6 Argonne Road-19010 Trent, CMAQ 77 576 7 Broadway/Sullivan Intersection PCC STA 253 1,230 _ 8 Indiana/Sullivan Intersection PCC STA __ 275 1.342 Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 65 of 72 ! • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 9 Sullivan Road(PE only)-Euclid to Wellesley STP(U1 40 298 10 SullivanlSpraque Intersection PCC City 933 1,678 11 Pavement Management Program-Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000 12 Pavement Management Program-Local Access City 2,000 2,000 13 STEP Paveback Cif 3,543 3.543 2010 Totals: 9,709 20.493 Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan 2011 dollars in thousands) Item Project Description Primary City Total # Source Amount Amount 6 Argonne Road-190 to Trent, CMAQ 101 713 9 Sullivan Road PE onl -Euclid to Wellesle STP U 40 298 11 Pavement Management Program-Arterials Other Fed 2.000 4,000 12 Pavement Management Program-Local Access city -__2,000 2.000 13 STEP Paveback City 757 757 14 Pines Corridor ITS:Sprague to Treat CMAQ 280 2,081 15 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 147 735 16 Mission Ave.-Flora to Barker STP(U) 128 949 2011 Totals: 5.453 11.533 — Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 66 of 72 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan 2012 (dollars in thousands) Item project Description Primary City Total Source ount un 11 Pavemen Management Program-Arterials Other Fed 2 000 4,000 12_Pavement Management Program-Local Access City _ 2,000 2,000 15 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 147 735 -1111 Mission Ave.-Flora to Barker STP(U) 671 4,967 17 Park Road-_#2(CN Only)-Broadway to Indiana STP(U) 262 __ 1 942 18 Bowdish Road-32nd to 8th STP(U) __ 116 - 862 2012 Totals: _ 5,196 14,506 ~ Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan 2013 jdollars in thousands) Item Project Description Primary City Total Source Amount Amount 11 Pavement Management Program-Arterials Other Fed 2.000 _ 4.000 12 Pavement Management Program-Local Access City 2.000 2,000 15 Sullivan Road West Bridqe BR _ 1.300 6.500 17 Park Road-#2(CN Only)-Broadway to Indiana STP(UI 509 3,767 18 Bowdish Road-32nd to 8th STP(U) 89 655 19 Park Road-Bridging the Valley/BNSF_Grade Separation Other Fed _ 31 750 20 Saltese/Sullivan Signal Developers -__62 _ 250 2013 Totals: 5.991 17,922 Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan 2014 (dollars in thousands) Item Proiect Description Primary City Total # Source Amount Amount 11 Pavement Management Program-Arterials Other Fed 2.000 4.000 12 pavement Management Program-Local Access City 2.000 2,000 15 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR _1.300 6,500 18 Bowdish Road-32nd to 8th STP(U) 1.051 7,782 19 Park Road-Bridging the Valley/BNSF Grade Separation Other Fed 90 2 150 21 Sprague/Barker Traffic Signal Developers 15 75 2014 Totals: 6.456 22,507 Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 67 of 72 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan 2015 (dollars in thousands) _ Item Project Description Primary City Total _# Source Amount oun 1 •-vemen Mana•emen Pro.ram-Arterials 0 her Fed 2 000 4 000 12 --v-m-n Mana•emen Pr..ram-Local Access Cit 2.000 2 100 19 Park Road-Bridging the Valley/BNSF Grade Separation Other Fed _ 286 6.809-1111 21 Sprague/Barker Traffic Signal Develo ers 370 22 AAppleway Extension jUniversity to Evergreen STP 64 ___205 23 Barker Road-Appleway tg roadway Avenue UAP 52 259 24 Mansfeld Extension-Pines(SR27)to 300-ft East of Houk Rd UAP 73 , 367 25 Sullivan Road_fRW/CN only)-Euclid to Wellesley STP(U) r 54 400 26 Sullivan Road North Extension(Bigelow Gulch) City 55 _= 55 27 Trent(SR290)-Del Rav to Barker Turn Lane Developers _ 133 532 gi Park/Sprague Intersection PCC STP(P) 19 138 29 Sullivan Rd ITS.Broadway to 24th CMAQ 150 1.108 , 3Q,Citywide ITS Improvements CMAQ 95 790 31 Ever•reen/32nd- 16th to 32nd.Evergreen to SR-27 STP(U) 164 1,215 • _ 2015 Totals: 6,219 16,158 Table-140 Six Year-Trans)>er'talistt-; });ave t,:-Itte roan urnmar/7009-T hre:u=lr 201 iii-64-f000) Secured-Projects Planned-P-rojects TOTALS _1s7al State Other City Tetal Fe4eral State Othrez 64y Te•a4 F-Floral Slate Other City 4-€44! 2_-- 5834 1,522 3;063 4,230 14,343 409 4 403 3,277 493 5440 1826 346 1447 13,43: 233 1,759 3466 2,044 3435 9404 2,462 1,759 1,617 3435 9,023 3,82-1 3425 3494 7,990 48427 2011 2,413 0 0 3873 6486 6,843 0,135 444 1,759 17,152 54-56 9436 444 44.32 3243-9 24 0 0 0 2492 3492 9,544 8445 444 2,221 21,224 9844 8455 404 47643 23,646 1151' 0 0 0 2494 2494 44493 1420 410 2429 24467 447893 5420 410 4,720 24,349 0 0 0 2494 2494 6,7-25 46-9 497 1,747 40441 6.723 4,499 497 47333 4-2432 T01,41.S l 0-,-743 208 5,101 33432 36410 387384 26,113 3,775 34,788 63490 43,657 28431 0433 33400 14-,030 Table 4,39 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program Summary 2010 through 2015(in$1,000) I Secured Projects Planned Projects Totals Yea} Federal State Other City Total Federal State Other City Total Federal State Other C Total 2010 $2,053 53.826 $2,905 $2,166 5_10,950 $2000 SO 50 57,543 $9,543 $4,053 $3,826 $2,905 59 709 $20.493 2011 $2,671 50 50 $421 $3092 $3,409 50 50 $5,032 58,441 $6,080 50 SO $5453 511,533 2012 5.111 $9 50 SO 50 $9,310 50 50 $5,196 $14,506 $9,310 50 $9 $5.196 $14,506 2013 50 SO 50 50 SO $11,388 $318 $225 $5,991 517,922 511,388 11.18 $225 $5.991 $17,922 2014 50 SO 50 55 50 $14,976 $911 $164 $6,456 $22,507 $14,976 $911 $164 $6,456 $22,507 2515 SO 5 0 50 $0 S0 58477 53.389 St 25 $5,211 518102 51411 53389 51025 $5.211 $18,102 Tot* 54,724 51,826 $2,905 52 587 .$14,042 $49 560 $4,618 51 414 $35,429 $91,021 554,284 $8,444 54319 538,016 $105,063 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 68 of 72 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Table 4.40 Six Year Transportation Imi-revement R-reg am-2009-Threuag 44(4r -1-000) Prej is Without Local-Match-Within Existing-Rose ee.s Iarejoct Name Rrojest-9escriptIo 4 Total Cost 8t#Avenue-Phase 1 Carnahan to Havana R enue-te-a-three-tane•sestien with curb $276-1-5 8th Avenue Phase 2 Park to Dickoy Reconstruct-Stir-Avenuo to a thrco lane suction with curb, 6,345,6 , - - - - - - gutter,sidewalks and-bike-lanes - - 8 . Carnahan '-_e-- -- - • ' - -: _ - • :: --e _e_ ion-With-cu-(437 14 ' - - - - - - _ gutter,sidewalks-and-bike-lanes - - Barker Road Reconstruction 32nd to 8th Spokane-County-Project-reconstruct Barker to 3 land 849 - - - - - section;City partner match - - Bowdich Road Rehab 32nd to 8th 84,593 • - - - - - - Reconstruct and widen-roadway to-three lanes - So Z. • !Z.: -0 e......• ,,iea-te $.27-9 ; 32nd 2 inch grind and inlay existing road I SR 27/Pines 116th Intersection 63,132 - - - - - Improvements to intersection(dual land roundabout?) - - =TOTAL: - - - - - - $4-87644 Table 4.40 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2010 Through 2015(in$1,000) Projects without Local Match within Existing Resources Pro'ect Name Pro,ect Descrl•tion Total Cost 32nd Avenue-Evergreen to Reconstruct and widen to three lanes with Best curbs and sidewalks. 2.237.00 8th Avenue Phase 1-Carnahan Reconstruct 8th Ave. to a three-lane section to Havana with curb utter sidewalks and bike lanes. 3.483.00 8th Avenue Phase 2-Park to Reconstruct 8th Ave. to a three-lane section Dickey with curb •utter sidewalks and bike lanes. 5,120.00 ' 8th Avenue Phase 3-Dickey to Reconstruct 8th Ave.to a three-lane section Carnahan with curb,gutter,sidewalks and bike lanes. 4_,6.6.7.0.0_ Appleway Extension-Evergreen Extend Appleway Blvd.with a multi-lane to Tshirley facilit includin. curbs and sidewalks. 13.219.00 Reconstruct to 3-lane roadway w/center turn lane, sidewalks,curb&gutter and Barker Road-8th to Appleway stormwater 5,475.00 Barker Road-Spokane River to Trent Reconstruct to a 2-lane curbed arterial 6 530.00 Broadway Coil Argonne/Mullan Intersections PCC Reconstruct intersections in PCC 1,556.00 Broadway Ave- Flora to Barker Reconstruct to 3-lanes, Flora to Barker 6824.00 Carnahan Truck Lane-8th to City Limits Add SB truck Lane to road 5,973.00 Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 69 of 72 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Euclid Ave/Flora Rd-Flora Euclid to Euclid. Euclid Flora to Reconstruct to provide a 2-lane. shouldered Barker arterial 5.408.00 Flora Road-Spraque to Mission Reconstruct&widen to 3-lane roadway 5 175.00_ Kiernan& Sullivan PCC Reconstruct Intersection in PCC 1 350.00 Park Road-#3-Sprague to Reconstruct and widen to a standard three- Broadwa lane arterial street with curbs and sidewalks 4 244.00 Pines Corridor ITS: Sprague to 16th Traffic Si.nal Control S stem for Corridor 785.00 Improvements to intersection dual lane SR27/Pines/16th Intersection Roundabout) 3.189.00- 1 University/Sprague Intersection Replace asphalt pavement with portland PCC cement concrete pavement. 1,642.00 TOTAL 76877.00 Potential Annexation Areas/Urban Services The Growth Management Act requires that counties designate urban growth areas (UGAs). The City of Spokane Valley identified lands adjacent to the City within existing UGAs that would likely be developed for urban uses and potentially be annexed to the City. In order to assess the need for capital facilities, the City has identified existing service providers within the Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). This assessment should help identify the effects a potential annexation area will have on existing levels of service. Table 4.41 Existing Urban Service Providers within Potential Annexation Areas(PAAs) PAAs Northwood Northeast East Southeast South Ponderosa Edgecliff Domestic Water Pasadena Park Consolidated Consolidated Vera Vera S.C.W.O.No.3 East Spokane Hutton Settlement Consolidated S.C.W.D.No.3 Fire&Emergency Services F.D.No.1&9 F.D.No.t F.D.No.1 F.D.No 1&8 F.D.No.1&8 F.D.No.8 F.D.No.1&8 Law Enforcement Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Libraries S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist. Parks&Open Space Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Public Schools W.V.S.D.&S.D.81 E.V.S.D C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. W.V.S.D.&S.D.81 Public Transit Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Sanitary Sewer Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Not Sewered Spokane County Solid WastelRecycle Waste MgmL Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt Waste Mgmt Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt Waste Mgmt Storm water Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Street Cleaning Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Transportation Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County The City of Spokane Valley has adopted Levels of Service (LOS) to measure a public facility or service's operational characteristics to gauge its performance. The following analysis will assess current levels of service in the PAAs to provide a context of how annexation could affect the City's LOS and provide guidance for phasing of annexations. Additionally, the analysis will provide City staff and elected officials information to assist in the planning and budgeting of public service delivery as a result of annexation to the City of Spokane Valley. The following study includes LOS analysis for sanitary sewer and parks and open space. Analysis is not provided for services where the City has adopted the minimum regional LOS. Services excluded from this analysis are domestic water, fire protection, law enforcement, libraries, public schools, public transit, sanitary sewer, solid waste/recycle, storm water, street cleaning, and transportation. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 05-27-2009) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities Page 70 of 72 • • Exhibit 4 Chapter 7 - Economic Development • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Policies EDP-2.1 Develop appropriate urban design and infrastructure standards for the City Center area. EDP-2.2 Develop zoning, permitting, and incentives that encourage prioritized development consistent with the SVCP. EDP-2.3 Focus economic development resources through specific redevelopment areas as appropriate. Goal EDG-3 Promote the development of a qualified labor force that is globally competitive and responds to the changing needs of the workplace. Policies EDP-3.1 Encourage the region's world-class education consortium. EDP-3.2 Encourage post-secondary education and technical schools to locate and expand offerings within the City of Spokane Valley. EDP-3.3 Encourage community colleges and technical schools in the development of customized training programs for businesses. EDP-3.4 Encourage K-12 education to include skills-based training and creative partnerships with business. EDP-3.5 Encourage public/private partnerships in training and education, through continuing employee education. EDP-3.6 Encourage cooperation among businesses, schools, labor unions and other organizations in developing job training through apprenticeships, mentoring and other programs. EDP-3.7 Promote opportunities that employ Spokane Valley residents in Spokane Valley. Goal EDG-4 Encourage regional tourism as a sustainable provider of jobs and markets. Policies EDP-4.1 Encourage the development of a comprehensive tourism promotion plan that supports the marketing efforts of regional tourism agencies, attractions and events. EDP-4.2 Encourage the development of local attractions, recreational, cultural and sports events which take advantage of the four seasons. EDP-4.3 Encourage and promote the marketing of appropriate facilities that are consistent with Spokane Valley's tourism objectives. EDP-4.4 Expand and develop neighborhood and regional linkages and improvements to the Centennial Trail and Spokane River frontage. Goal EDG-5 Collaborate with other governmental agencies and the business community to promote a sustainable, strong, diverse and healthy regional economy. Policies EDP-5.1 Improve the effectiveness of capital improvement programs by encouraging greater communication and coordination between local governments and the private sector. EDP-5.2 Develop and implement strategies to identify and use appropriate Federal, State and regional economic resources and incentives. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 7-31-2008) Chapter 7—Economic Development Page 15 of 16 • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan EDP-5.3 Encourage the continued support and funding of active duty, reserves and National Guard components of the United States Armed Forces. EDP-5.4 Collaborate with other local governments and business organizations in promoting legislation in support of economic development when appropriate. EDP-5.5 Encourage development of and participation in a recognition/certification program for businesses and non-profits moving toward local, sustainable practices in their operations. EDP-5.6 Encourage development of and participation in a "buy local" campaign. Goal EDG-6 Establish a balanced approach to environmental sustainability which complements the utilization of area resources and economic growth. Policies EDP-6.1 Encourage the retention, development and recruitment of environmentally friendly businesses. EDP-6.2 Encourage programs that foster and promote sustainable business practices. EDP-6.3 Encourage the development of clean technologies. Goal EDG-7 Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility, consistency, predictability and clear direction. Policies EDP-7.1 Evaluate, monitor and improve development standards to promote compatibility between adjacent land uses; and update permitting processes to ensure that they are equitable, cost-effective, and expeditious. EDP-7.2 Review development regulations periodically to ensure clarity, consistency and predictability. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Update 7-31-2008) Chapter 7—Economic Development Page 16 of 16 Of a � I P1 Map 7.1 ��;�� r _ 2009 w: 1 . Development Activity f 10 , • 'I-'7.4,.1 :r r -,ell 1 • e�jkanc rr ' ` r. - R \ moo, rrrm is �/ „�r j�/ t F r i e�wr` f 0.I•, '— _.,�' • 9 k4�J ,.d w ruJ nn.l r. �"� 1r �„�, T,w of illw ,, ....).--11r'AP 1 M+ P!r° �� T �'. �� IIIr tiRIT_ �-.�?� 91 J rind Rcurdaf ye. .f �' �:c ' ✓i -� -� • •� _ ,. ri _� rl.�wrtl,n„n.ry nlyrw.l r r �j� ”. an ra • � ;,;.. .__.I1ds 14.I'App6•.mm G Sit + u • t — y �'rirAm,Gmwh IbuJnv 1i91 • I Jrn�./r" .w.• �Y49�. W I • -z ir ; ri I j ci of A Cay of.n„l..nr Ven y � Y1R(� .]Ja '''T-1- - _ %`� I/ '--�I �r --� , Ilr L, ,/�/ ��.Other MwuarnHlkr - .. IA_ F. i ~ it _I -wr.. i //' �7\� F L c./ l �� rn� ,i L fir.. ■ •,.>r1).- .-1 a 1/,,R- -�1-, _ ilk L_. 1 .. 1.� 'b"• ��%�/ NCT MF-2 • yy btw A P,. _* I° 'r_ �" ! �1i - II C �rw�.• e J' Y�0 MUA GO a ,i�y��I �" _ � � • ' yr} wI ®GCC• : a�•6i?� r`! I +/ �i F•"G f�l �. • IrJ •_ r7. • I. .�I GCA \\CMU i __� _ _�♦ .- `GG' r .m _'r_� C—• "h+ a._,� -• � ,: •r� ` f(,l " CC MUC !w' • _ �y-�p� gas. r ' ?r '�� rw k 'a- - u r ''. a I ��R 1 .y:%3 C rt. r 1 qi- j I! A.y i.m Ai, _ •l . - Ili, L.-+ 'tl•I t e -�-�. R-2 RC y J ,'i� i lr r \ rsy.,\'I t_ vii.4 {�� 121 ur I G, I S .�r r - R-3 1-1 ,Io , I —1►� 10 J' -i • r�•. ' R-4 1-2 /// i •....I ii/3 106• 7-- _ ra y :�, r / I ME-1 P/OS 111 '1 _ Ia.,' 1 t Map lAention ■/ Il �'a- /? .- Ordin.ncc No.:\'�-.L'�G\ ^pq. h. L G 4,t 1c 40 ....4. diii W -I+{�.F1x I � �allcy T ttS 1- , 0 a.5 I 21i1p ��rr f I 1 I i I I • .... r Noon. The o.f.,,..,ln.n,l.,rn rr.this way/a compiled/row rreoms r /I/^� y L,■ '7�a f amine,gad b,.Hier to a.wmr m slot n.Cky wakes na dn/w, ., ` _-' or mewl:he xrx.0(Yar noway of MS ," \�./ /. ' ` cgesnWya4rrlrlw,liability awl a..Y,bw In IY cement. _ ti- —. \ r.innna.,lr,.rr .,arch fSp. .Volley. w ✓v -1 /a..rMlr.rnr!]elnn..rnc rheum*nJPiow,.x,0091 9:1-1000. .-,/ j Product et rn c]y w1i..1.■Vdq.Owmwlt'O.A.emem&..k.. • Exhibit 5 Chapter 8 — Natural Environment • • City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan NEP-8.5 Land use regulations/decisions should consider density transfers, transfer of development rights, bonus density, natural wetland preserves, wetland banking or other mechanisms to retain wetlands whenever possible. NEP-8.6 Encourage public and private groups to consider protection and/or acquisition of wetlands and their buffer areas. NEP-8.7 Encourage the preservation of wetlands associated with wildlife habitat corridors identified by accepted scientific standards. Aquifer/Groundwater Goal NEG-9 Strive to prevent water quality degradation of the Spokane Valley/Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer. NEP-9.1 Encourage the development of an inter-jurisdictional, long range plan to manage and protect the Spokane Valley/Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer,_ Goal NEG-10 Endeavor to protect groundwater quality from adverse development impacts. Policies NEP-10.1 Participate in cooperative surface and groundwater management efforts with other affected jurisdictions in the region. NEP-10.2 Consider adopting regulations to reduce or eliminate the impact of land uses that pose a risk to groundwater. NEP-10.23 Strive to retain floodplains and associated wetlands in its natural condition. Fish and Wildlife Goal NEG-11 Strive to preserve, protect, and enhance fish and wildlife habitat. Goal NEG-12 Strive to minimize the Impact on priority species from habitat alteration and other human activities. Policies NEP-12.1 Utilize best available science in managing wildlife habitat. NEP-12.2 Strive to preserve and enhance native vegetation in riparian habitats. NEP-12.3 Encourage the use and preservation of native plants in residential and nonresidential landscaping. NEP-12.4 Foster the protection of wildlife corridors in publicly owned open space where appropriate. These areas should use native plants that support native species of birds and animals where appropriate. NEP-12.5 Encourage informational and educational programs and activities dealing with the protection of wildlife. NEP-12.6 Land use regulations and decisions will consider density transfers, bonus density, nature area preservation or other innovative mechanisms to retain fish and wildlife habitat areas. NEP-12.7 Development proposals and their design shall consider the retention and maintenance of critical fish and wildlife habitat areas and will provide buffers to protect corridors and water habitats. NEP-12.8 Coordinate with Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife in planning and management of fish and wildlife habitat resources. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 8—Natural Environment Page 22 of 24 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan NEP-12.9 Encourage the public acquisition and/or protection of sensitive habitats including but not limited to wetlands and shorelines. Flood Areas Goal NEG-13 Work to identify watershed characteristics that affect frequently flooded areas. Goal NEG-14 Assist In the management of frequently flooded areas to enhance environmental quality and to minimize the risks to life and property. Policies NEP-14.1 Frequently flooded areas and marshes should be used as forest, wildlife habitat, open space, recreation and other appropriate uses whenever practical. NEP-14.2 Require the maintenance, protection or restoration of natural drainage systems and use bioengineering techniques rather than structural solutions where possible. NEP-14.3 Development should meet the objectives and requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program for reducing floods hazards and minimizing flood losses within a 100-year floodplain.. Geologically Hazardous Areas Goal NEG-15 Development should be discouraged in geologically hazardous areas unless it can be demonstrated that a hazard area can be developed consistent with public health and safety. Development permits should be conditioned to mitigate certain hazards. Goal NEG-16 Geologically hazardous areas may be used as open space for recreation, forest, wildlife habitat and other uses as appropriate. Policies NEP-16.1 Limit clearing and grading activities in geologically hazardous areas. NEP-16.2 Development proposals within geologically hazardous areas should include an erosion control plan and/or stabilization plan prior to receiving approval. NEP-16.3 Land use regulations and decisions should consider density transfers, bonus density, nature belt preservation or other innovative mechanisms to retain geologically hazardous areas in a natural state whenever appropriate. Surface Water Goal NEG-17 Encourage the continued provision of both adequate quantity and quality of surface water for Spokane Valley. Goal NEG-18 Encourage land uses that are consistent with long-term protection of surface water quality and quantity In Spokane Valley. Goal NEG-19 Collaborate with appropriate public and private entities to help restore the water quality of the Spokane River. Policies NEP-19.1 Impacts of a development proposal upon surface water quality shall be considered before development is approved. Conditioning proposals may be necessary to protect water quality (e.g. biofiltration measures), manage runoff and address erosion control and sedimentation. NEP-19.2 Update the City's interim shoreline management program. Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 8—Natural Environment Page 23 of 24