10-109 Law Enforcement Services Return to: Daniela Erickson
Clerk of the Board
1115 W.Broadway
Spokane,WA 99260
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
FOR COSTS INCIDENT TO LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
IN THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY /0 -07/7
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into among Spokane County, a political
subdivision of the state of Washington,having offices for the transaction of business at 1116
West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as
"COUNTY," the Spokane County Sheriff, a separate elected official of Spokane County,.
having offices for the transaction of business at 1100 West Mallon Avenue, Spokane,
Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as "SHERIFF" and the City of Spokane Valley,
a municipal corporation of the state of Washington, having offices for the transaction of
business at the Redwood Plaza, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley,
Washington 99206, hereinafter referred to as "CITY,"jointly hereinafter referred to as the
"Parties" and individually referred to as "Party".
COUNTY, SHERIFF and CITY agree as follows.
SECTION NO. 1: RECITALS AND FINDINGS
1.1 Under RCW 36.32.120(6), the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County,
acting on behalf of Spokane County, has the care of County property and the management
of County funds and business.
1.2 Under chapter 39.34 RCW("Interlocal Cooperation Act"), public agencies may contract
with each other to perform certain functions which each may legally perform.
1.3 Under chapter 36.28 RCW, the Spokane County Sheriff is the Chief Law Enforcement
Officer and Conservator of the Peace of Spokane County.
1.4 The City of Spokane Valley desires to utilize the services of the Spokane County
Sheriff's Office to provide law enforcement services.
Page 1 of 18
0,01b° 109
Return to: Daniela Erickson
Clerk of the Board
1115 W.Broadway
Spokane,WA 99260
1.5 The direct and indirect costs for law enforcement services will be set forth in the Law
Enforcement Cost Allocation plan ("LECAP"), attached hereto as Exhibit "3" and
incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION NO. 2: DEFINITIONS
2.1 Agreement: "Agreement" means this Interlocal Agreement among Sheriff, City and
County regarding law enforcement services.
2.2 City: "CITY"means the City of Spokane Valley.
2.3 County: "COUNTY"means Spokane County.
2.4 Services: "Services"means those services identified in Exhibit 1.
2.5 Sheriff: "SHERIFF" means the duly elected sheriff of Spokane County possessing
those general duties set forth in chapter 36.28 RCW.
2.6 Uncontrollable Circumstances: "Uncontrollable Circumstances" means the following
events: riots, wars, civil disturbances, insurrections, acts of terrorism, external fires and
floods, volcanic eruptions, lightning or earthquakes at or near where the Services are
performed and/or that directly affect providing of such services.
SECTION NO. 3: PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to reduce to writing the Parties' understanding as to the
terms and conditions under which SHERIFF will provide Services to CITY. The services
will be consistent with the City's council/manager form of management. RCW 35.A13
SECTION NO. 4: DURATION AND TERMINATION
4.1 Initial term and Renewal. The initial term of this Agreement shall commence as of
12:01 A.M. on January 1, 2010, and run through Midnight, December 31, 2013. Thereafter,
this Agreement shall automatically renew for four-year time frames, unless the termination
process outlined herein is invoked.
4.2 Process for Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by any party by
providing written notice on or after June 30, 2012 to all other Parties. COUNTY shall
consult with SHERIFF prior to providing written notice of termination under this
subsection. SHERIFF shall consult with COUNTY prior to providing written notice of
termination under this subsection. This termination will be effective (18) eighteen months
Page 2 of 18
after written notice is provided as long as such written notice is provided prior to Midnight
December 31, 2013. The same time intervals for terminations shall apply to future terms if
the termination process is not invoked during the initial contract period.
4.3 Implementation of Termination. When notice of termination is given, SHERIFF and
CITY agree to jointly prepare a Transition Plan.
4.3.1 Transition Plan. The Transition Plan shall identify and address, among other
items (i) personnel issues; (ii) workload; and (iii) ongoing case assignments. If the
SHERIFF and CITY cannot mutually agree to the terms of the Transition Plan, either
Party can request arbitration as provided in Section No. 18. SHERIFF and CITY
shall equally share the cost of said arbitration.
4.3.2 Implementation of Transition Plan. Parties agree to use all best efforts to
create and effectuate a mutual implementation of the Transition Plan.
4.4 Termination of the Agreement-Vehicles and Equipment. At the termination of this
Agreement, CITY shall have the option to purchase, subject to agreement of SHERIFF and
COUNTY, COUNTY-owned vehicles and/or equipment used to provide Services.
4.5 Waiver of Statutory Terms. To the extent that it is applicable to law enforcement
services, the Parties hereby waive the statutory termination rights of RCW 39.34.180(3)
and elect instead to follow these contractual termination procedures as the sole method of
terminating this Agreement, the terms of which are detailed in this subsection.
4.6 Termination of the Agreement and Settle and Adjust. The Parties recognize that
Cost for Services under the Agreement is calculated utilizing the LECAP. The LECAP is
based on actual costs from two years prior to the current contract year. As such, in the
event this Agreement is terminated as provided for in Sub-section 4.2 hereinabove, the
Agreement will be subject to a settle and adjust for the last two years of the term of the
Agreement based upon the LECAP for the two (2) subsequent years after termination. In
the event of termination, the Parties shall follow the process set forth in Section No. 6 to
determine the settle and adjust for each of the last two (2) years of the Agreement as well
as the process to object to the final adjustment determined for each of the last two (2)
years to include dispute resolution as set forth in Subsection 6.7 set forth hereinafter.
SECTION NO. 5: SERVICES
5.1 Services Provided and Service Levels. The Sheriff shall provide those Services set
forth in Exhibit "1" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. CITY may
unilaterally, on an annual basis, adjust the service level FTE's set forth in Category One
of Exhibit "1." Written notice of such an adjustment to Category One shall be provided
by CITY to COUNTY and SHERIFF no later than November 30th with the adjustments
Page 3 of 18
to be effective on January 1st of the following year. If COUNTY fails to provide the third
quarterly report or changes to the LECAP allocation as set forth in Section 5.2 below,
said notice is required to occur 30 days after this information is provided. Any other
adjustments in Category One services may occur by mutual agreement as set forth in
Section 6.6.
CITY and SHERIFF, by mutual agreement may also adjust the level of service FTE's set
forth in Category Two of Exhibit "1." Such agreement shall be executed no later than
November 30th preceding the contract year.
Any adjustments in services under this section shall only be operative after relevant
notice and impact bargaining negotiations for reductions in force are satisfied with the
relevant Collective Bargaining Units but in no event shall the delay in implementation
exceed 60 days.
Notwithstanding the above, SHERIFF'S ability to fulfill his statutory obligation to
provide law enforcement services to COUNTY and CITY shall not be limited.
5.2 Periodic Reporting Requirements. SHERIFF shall provide to CITY quarterly
reports, within 30 days from the end of each quarter, that identify statistics used to
calculate CITY'S cost in the LECAP referenced in Section No. 6 below. Those statistics
which are only available to COUNTY on an annual basis shall be provided annually
within 30 days of the end of each calendar year. However, records and property room
statistics shall be provided within 15 days after they are provided by CITY. These
reports will allow CITY to monitor service consumption and cost accrual throughout the
year.
COUNTY will provide to CITY any changes in the allocation of law enforcement services
set forth in the adopted LECAP as defined in Section 6.3
SECTION NO. 6: COST OF SERVICES
6.1 Basis. Cost for services shall be based upon the Law Enforcement Cost Allocation
Plan (LECAP) as previously identified and incorporated herein.
6.2 Methodology. Costs for Services will be calculated utilizing the Cost Calculation
Model (CCM) as shown in Exhibit "2" which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference.
6.3 COCAP and LECAP. Once the Countywide Cost Allocation Plan ("COCAP") and
LECAP are finalized, no changes will be made to any department cost or allocation basis
until the following year other than as indicated in the MID-YEAR FULL TIME
EQUIVALENT FTE ADJUSTMENTS defined in sub-section 6.6. Each year,
Page 4 of 18
departments within the Sheriff's Office will be reviewed to determine if the costs are
being appropriately allocated. Each allocation basis will be reviewed to determine if it is
the best basis for allocating the costs. Any changes in allocating department costs or
changes in allocation basis will be provided to CITY with explanations for any deviation
from the initial plan no later than the end of the third quarter. Both the COCAP and the
LECAP will be prepared in accordance with U.S. Office of Management and Budget
Circular A-87. The LECAP referenced herein shall not contain COUNTY costs as set
forth in Category Four of Exhibit "1" and further the COCAP shall not contain COUNTY
costs for treasurer tax collections.
The COCAP and the LECAP will be completed by September 30th of each year for
determining the actual costs for the prior year. For example, the actual cost for the
calendar year 2009 would be completed by September 30, 2010.
6.4 CCM. Costs for Services shall be calculated utilizing the LECAP. The LECAP will be
based on actual costs.
The model based on the LECAP costs from two years prior will estimate costs for the
current agreement year. The Per Commissioned Officer Rate as well as the dollar amount
for Other Allocations for the contract year will be multiplied by (1) any cost of living or
wage change(s) granted commissioned deputies under any collective bargaining agreement
for the calendar year immediately following the LECAP year; and by (2) a 1.25%
multiplier for the calendar year immediately following the LECAP year; and by (3) any cost
of living or wage change(s) granted commissioned deputies under any collective bargaining
agreement for the calendar year two years subsequent to the LECAP year; and by (4) a
1.25%multiplier for the calendar year two years subsequent to the LECAP year.
After generating the Per Commissioned Officer rate for the interlocal agreement year using
the Commissioned Officer Worksheet (Exhibit "1"), the number of Category One and
Category Two officers will be updated to reflect current year staffing levels. The total
contract costs then will be automatically calculated. This model can also be used for any
MID-YEAR FULL TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE) ADJUSTMENTS. The CCM shall be
provided by COUNTY to CITY by September 30th for the following year.
6.5 Retro-Active Salary Adjustments. Should any applicable bargaining agreement not
be settled in time to include any salary adjustments granted commissioned deputies under
any collective bargaining agreement in the contract calculation model for a given year, and
that collective bargaining agreement is settled during that year, and the settlement contains a
retroactive salary adjustment, COUNTY will bill CITY for the full amount of CITY's
portion of the retroactive payment. CITY will be responsible for paying COUNTY within
thirty (30) days of the billing date. Additionally, COUNTY will recalculate the estimated
Interlocal Agreement amount employing the cost of living or wage increase(s) granted
Page 5 of 18
commissioned deputies under any collective bargaining agreement and adjust the remaining
monthly payments.
6.6 Mid-Year Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Adjustments. In the event the Parties
negotiate a change in full time positions, mid-year, such change, for purposes of
calculating costs under the LECAP, can occur only once during any interlocal agreement
year and in any event no later than August 30th of such year. Additionally, COUNTY
will recalculate the estimated interlocal agreement amount and adjust the remaining
monthly payments. Any reduction would become operative only after the relevant notice
and impact bargaining obligations for reductions in force are satisfied with the effected
Collective Bargaining unit but in no event shall the delay in implementation exceed 60
days.
6.7 Settle and Adjust. The LECAP will be used to reconcile the actual Agreement cost for
the year for which it is calculated to the amount the CITY paid the County during that same
year as set forth in Section 6.9. After completing the Cost Calculation Model for the current
Agreement year, any overage or underage from the settle and adjust will be applied to the
total amount. This combined figure will follow the billing procedure.
COUNTY shall provide CITY with its final adjustment in writing no later than September
30th of any calendar year. The adjustment will include a copy of the full LECAP. CITY
will have thirty (30) calendar days from its receipt of the written adjustment to provide
COUNTY with any written objections to the amounts set forth therein. COUNTY agrees to
consider all written objections received from CITY and reply to CITY no later than fifteen
(15) calendar days of receipt of CITY'S objections. In the event that the Parties cannot
mutually resolve any written objections(s) submitted by CITY within an additional fifteen
(15) calendar day time frame, or such other time frame as the Parties may mutually agree to,
the objections shall be resolved pursuant to the Dispute Resolution provisions set forth in
Section No. 18.
6.8 Capital Purchases. Capital items deemed necessary for all commissioned officers,
excluding vehicles, with a cost greater than COUNTY capital threshold (currently
$2,000) and less than $10,000, as well as capital items with a cost equal to or greater than
$50,000, will be billed to CITY at the time of purchase contingent upon prior CITY
authorization. CITY will be billed according to CITY'S current usage percentage of the
items. COUNTY will bill CITY for this cost at the time of the purchase and payment
will be due within 30 days of the billing date. After the LECAP is completed for the year
of the purchase(s), COUNTY will give CITY credit for the full amount paid in that year.
All capital items purchased will become the property of COUNTY. Capital items that
have been purchased with grant funds by either CITY or COUNTY, or other funding
sources, and capital items that are not utilized in providing law enforcement service to
CITY, will not be charged to CITY. All capital items that are utilized in providing law
Page 6 of 18
enforcement service to CITY and that were not purchased with other funding sources will
be incorporated as fixed assets in the COCAP and reimbursed through depreciation. The
COCAP is a cost within the LECAP.
6.9 Billing Procedure. COUNTY will bill CITY for one-twelfth of COUNTY'S calculated
contract amount as determined in contract calculation model during the first week of the
month. Regular monthly payments by CITY will be due by the end of the month in which
they are billed.
6.10 Penalty. At the sole option of COUNTY, a penalty may be assessed on any late
payment of the monthly calculated contract amount owed by CITY in an amount equal to
lost interest earnings had the payment been timely paid and invested in the Spokane County
Treasurer's Investment Pool.
Any resolution of a disputed amount through use of the arbitration process identified in
Section No.18 shall include at the request of any Party, a determination of whether
interest is appropriate, including the amount.
SECTION NO. 7: MUNICIPAL POLICE AUTHORITY
CITY shall retain all police powers and by virtue of this Agreement CITY confers
municipal police authority on the SHERIFF.
SECTION NO. 8: OFFICER ASSIGNMENT, RETENTION, DISCIPLINE AND
HIRING.
COUNTY is acting hereunder as an independent contractor as to:
8.1 Hiring. The SHERIFF shall hire, assign, retain and discipline all employees/deputies
according to the collective bargaining agreement, civil service rules, and state and federal
laws.
8.2 Standards of Performance Governed by the SHERIFF. Control of personnel,
standards of performance, discipline and all other aspects of performance shall be governed
by the SHERIFF. Provided, however that only qualified, trained personnel meeting all of
the requirements of applicable state laws or regulations shall be utilized in the performance
of Services.
8.3 Assignment of Deputies. SHERIFF shall use, whenever possible, deputies who
volunteer for duty within CITY. In those instances where there are an insufficient number
of deputies who volunteer for duty within CITY, then SHERIFF shall determine who shall
be assigned for duty. SHERIFF and CITY will work together to encourage deputy retention
to provide continuity of service.
Page 7 of 18
8.4 Patrol Districts. CITY's Police Chief will establish patrol districts within CITY in
order to assure accurate collection of data related to criminal traffic activity. The patrol
districts will coincide within CITY limits as closely as possible without compromising
efficient use of reactive patrol deputies. A patrol district is a geographical area of a size and
configuration designed to minimize response times to citizen's calls for services. Response
is typically measured from the time a call is received to the time the unit arrives on the
scene.
8.5 Dedicated Patrol Units. SHERIFF recognizes that it is providing sworn police
services dedicated to CITY. In so doing, the law enforcement services shall be dedicated
to CITY and shall not be used elsewhere within COUNTY. Provided however, in the
event of an emergency or a call by a deputy for assistance, mutual aid may be rendered.
SECTION NO. 9: CITY POLICE CHIEF AND PRECINCT COMMANDER
SELECTION, REMOVAL AND DUTIES, AS WELL AS CITY MANAGER'S
RESPONSIBILITIES THERETO.
9.1 Selection of Police Chief or Precinct Commander. When, for any reason, there
occurs a vacancy in the position of Police Chief or Precinct Commander, the SHERIFF
shall designate three or more SHERIFF Deputies of the rank of Lieutenant or higher, or
as otherwise agreed by the parties, as candidates for each of the positions of CITY Police
Chief or Precinct Commander. The positions of Police Chief or Precinct Commander
shall be appointed from said lists of qualified candidates by the City Manager.
9.2 Removal of Police Chief or Precinct Commander.
9.2.1 Removal by SHERIFF. The SHERIFF may remove the Police Chief or
Precinct Commander at any time after consultation with the City Manager.
9.2.2 Removal By City Manager. The SHERIFF shall remove the Police Chief
or Precinct Commander at any time after the written request and consultation of
the City Manager.
9.2.3 Reduction of Precinct Commander's Rank Due to Economic Conditions.
A reduction in Sheriff's Office Civil Service Rank due to economic necessity shall
not be the sole basis for the removal of the appointed Precinct Commander by
either the City Manager or the SHERIFF.
9.3 Duties of Police Chief. The Police Chief shall report to the City Manager or his/her
designee and to the existing command structure within SHERIFF's Office.
The duties of the Police Chief shall include:
Page 8 of 18
9.3.1 Working with the City Manager or his/her designee to establish goals,
objectives and performance measures for CITY police services which reflect specific
needs within CITY;
9.3.2 Coordinating police activities within CITY, including hours of operation and
CITY specific protocols and procedures, attending meetings and providing reports as
requested by the City Manager and such other duties common to a City Police Chief
including enforcement of CITY codes and ordinances;
9.3.3 Reviewing the performance of deputies assigned to CITY. Reporting to CITY
Manager or his/her designee and SHERIFF any serious recommendations for
performance improvement;
9.3.4 Identify duties of deputies assigned to CITY as specific needs arise or as
requested by the City Manager or his/her designee within the context of established
policies and procedures. Reporting to SHERIFF any changes in duty of CITY
assigned deputies;
9.3.5 Overseeing implementation within CITY of all SHERIFF policies and
procedures. Maintaining a copy of SHERIFF procedures on file at City Hall for
CITY'S reference. SHERIFF shall be notified of any public disclosure requests to
view or obtain a copy of the policies and procedures on file.
9.3.6 Notifying the City Manager or his/her designee of any change in SHERIFF
procedures or policies, or resource as permitted by this agreement;
9.3.7 Identifying areas of supplemental training for deputies assigned to CITY.
Making recommendations to SHERIFF for supplemental training. Making
recommendations to the City Manager or his/her designee for training not provided
by SHERIFF;
9.3.8 Providing supervision and direction to the Precinct Commander, Lieutenants
and Sergeants assigned to CITY as well as other assigned personnel, and acting as
liaison with SHERIFF Command Staff;
9.3.9 Maintaining communication between the City Manager and SHERIFF
command structures to ensure that changes in SHERIFF policies are agreeable to
CITY and that change in CITY policies are agreeable to SHERIFF. In the event a
CITY procedure, policy, goal or operation differs from the SHERIFF'S, CITY
Manager or his/her designee, SHERIFF and COUNTY shall meet and mutually
determine which policy will prevail; and
Page 9 of 18
9.3.10 Notifying the City Manager or his/her designee of any significant criminal
occurrence or civil emergency within CITY or Region that would impact the public
safety or operations of CITY.
9.4 Duties of the Precinct Commander. The Precinct Commander shall act as Chief in
his/her absence and under the Chief as CITY Police Department's primary administrative
assistant.
9.5 Duties of the City Manager. The City Manager or his/her designee shall have the
responsibility of providing general direction and supervision to the assigned Police Chief
relative to the furnishing of law enforcement services to CITY as set forth in chapter 35A.13
RCW and the terms of this Agreement.
9.6 Quarterly Meetings - Sheriff and City Manager. The SHERIFF and the City
Manager shall meet on a quarterly basis to ensure regular communication and to seek
joint consideration of all matters of concern regarding the law enforcement Agreement.
Either party may invite representatives from their respective organizations to attend. It is
intended that the Parties in these meetings review the Interlocal Agreement and discuss
matters of mutual interest; monitor cost trends, work jointly on potential cost savings,
revenue sources and other budgetary matters that may impact service levels; seek long-
term sustainability of contract terms; consider changes in labor contracts, allocation of
resources or other potential cost changes and changes to the cost allocation plan that may
impact either party. The dates of these meetings will be determined by mutual agreement
but should coincide with the budget cycles of each party.
9.7 Quarterly meeting — Financial Representatives. Representatives for CITY and
COUNTY shall meet quarterly to discuss potential cost changes and changes to the
COCAP, the LECAP or the CCM.
SECTION NO. 10: OBSERVATION OF LABOR NEGOTIATIONS
CITY may participate with other cities that contract with COUNTY for law enforcement
services to select no more than two (2) representatives from the contracting cities to observe
labor negotiations between COUNTY, SHERIFF and the Collective Bargaining units
representing the employees of the SHERIFF, provided that such observers adhere to rules
established by COUNTY, the SHERIFF and the bargaining units for the negotiations.
SECTION NO. 11: PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND TRAINING
11.1 Ownership of Property and Equipment. The ownership of all property and
equipment utilized in association with either SHERIFF or CITY meeting their
responsibilities under the terms of this Agreement, shall remain with the original owner at
Page 10 of 18
all times to include termination, unless otherwise specifically and mutually agreed upon in
writing by the Parties to this Agreement.
11.2 Stationery, Notices and Forms. CITY shall supply at its own cost and expense
any special supplies, logos or patches, stationery, notices, forms where such must be
issued in the name of CITY.
11.3 Additional Technology. CITY desires to maintain a police force that is trained
and equipped with the latest technology. SHERIFF agrees to provide police service
personnel providing services under this agreement that are trained and equipped with
such technology as is customarily provided to deputies providing law enforcement
services in the unincorporated areas of Spokane County. Any technology not currently in
use or not customarily provided to patrol deputies, may be requested by CITY or
SHERIFF. Parties agree to meet and confer over the need for the acquisition, training, or
use of new technology with the final decision regarding the acquisition and use of new
technology resting solely with the SHERIFF so long as CITY and COUNTY have the
necessary financial resources to acquire such technology and train deputies in its use.
Such costs shall be incorporated into the LECAP.
11.4 Training. CITY has indicated that it may desire to have the deputies providing
Services to CITY under the terms of this Agreement attend additional or supplemental
training. The SHERIFF agrees not to unreasonably withhold approval of any written
request(s) by CITY for deputies providing Services under the terms of this Agreement to
attend additional or supplemental training. The SHERIFF may also require staff assigned
to provide Services to CITY under the terms of this Agreement to participate in necessary
state and federal training and conferences that focus on the prevention of crime and the
protection of CITY'S citizens. The costs of any additional or supplemental training
requested by CITY under this section and approved by the SHERIFF, or determined
necessary by the SHERIFF shall be born solely by CITY.
11.5 Police Department Building, Maintenance, and Janitorial. CITY will provide
offices, to include sufficient parking, for the City of Spokane Valley Police Department
located at 12710 E. Sprague Avenue, City of Spokane Valley, 99216 or at such other
location mutually agreed to between the CITY and SHERIFF. CITY shall provide all
operation, maintenance and janitorial services for said offices.
SECTION NO. 12: COMMUNITY IDENTITY
12.1 Patrol Vehicles. Patrol vehicles that are assigned to CITY may display the color,
identification and other logo of CITY at CITY's sole expense. Additionally, the vehicles
will indicate that they are SHERIFF vehicles. SHERIFF and CITY will determine the form
of identification jointly.
Page 11 of 18
12.2 Uniform. SHERIFF maintains a uniform directed by state law. It is a uniform that
carries a great deal of pride. CITY recognizes that the assigned personnel will retain the
uniform of the Spokane County Sheriff's Office; however, SHERIFF agrees that assigned
personnel may wear additional identification in the nature of a pin, patch, uniform items, or
other like identification indicating affiliation with CITY. The nature and design of any
additional identification will be determined jointly by SHERIFF and CITY and provided to
SHERIFF by CITY at CITY's sole expense.
SECTION NO. 13: RECORDS
All records prepared, owned, used or retained by COUNTY or SHERIFF in conjunction
with providing Services under the terms of this Agreement shall be deemed COUNTY
property and shall be made available to CITY upon request by the City Manager subject to
the records retention schedule set forth by the Washington State Secretary of State, the
attorney client and attorney work product privileges set forth in statute, court rule or case
law. The Parties agree to cooperate in complying with the provisions of Chapter 42.56
RCW.
SECTION NO. 14: UNCONTROLLABLE CIRCUMSTANCES/IMPOSSIBILITY
A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement
resulting from uncontrollable circumstances shall be deemed not a default under this
Agreement.
A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement
resulting from any change in or new law, order, rule or regulation of any nature which
renders providing of services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement legally
impossible, and any other circumstances beyond the control of the SHERIFF, which
render legally impossible the performance by the SHERIFF of its obligations under this
Agreement, shall be deemed not a default under this Agreement.
SECTION NO. 15: RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES
For the purpose of this section, the terminology "COUNTY" shall also include SHERIFF.
The Parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this
Agreement. COUNTY shall be an independent contractor and not the agent or employee of
CITY, that CITY is interested only in the results to be achieved and that the right to control
the particular manner, method and means in which the Services are performed is solely
within the discretion of the SHERIFF. Any and all employees who provide services to
CITY under this Agreement shall be deemed employees solely of the SHERIFF. The
SHERIFF shall be solely responsible for the conduct and actions of all employees under this
Agreement and any liability that may attach thereto. Likewise, no agent, employee, servant
Page 12 of 18
or representative of CITY shall be deemed to be an employee, agent, servant or
representative of the SHERIFF or COUNTY for any purpose.
SECTION NO. 16: LIABILITY
For the purpose of this Section, the terminology "COUNTY" shall also include the
"PROSECUTING ATTORNEY."
(a) COUNTY shall indemnify and hold harmless CITY and its officers, agents, and
employees, from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and
damages of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of any negligent act or
omission of COUNTY, its officers, agents and employees, relating to or arising out of
performing services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such
claim, action, loss, or damages is brought against CITY, COUNTY shall defend the same at
its sole cost and expense and if final judg 'rent in said suit be rendered against CITY, and its
officers, agents, and employees, or jointly against CITY and COUNTY and their respective
officers, agents, and employees, COUNTY shall satisfy the same.
(b) CITY shall indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY and its officers, agents, and
employees, from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and
damages of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of any negligent act or
omission of CITY, its officers, agents and employees, relating to or arising out of
performing Services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such
claim, action, loss, or damages is brought against COUNTY, CITY shall defend the same at
its sole cost and expense and if final judgment in said suit be rendered against COUNTY,
and its officers, agents, and employees, or jointly against COUNTY and CITY and their
respective officers, agents, and employees, CITY shall satisfy the same.
(c) If the comparative negligence of the Parties and their officers and employees is a
cause of such damage or injury, the liability, loss, cost, or expense shall be shared
between the Parties in proportion to their relative degree of negligence and the right of
indemnity shall apply to such proportion.
(d) Where an officer or employee of a Party is acting under the direction and control of
the other Party, the Party directing and controlling the officer or employee in the activity
and/or omission giving rise to liability shall accept all liability for the other Party's
officer or employee's negligence.
(e) Each Party's duty to indemnify shall survive the termination or expiration of the
Agreement.
(f) The foregoing indemnity is specifically intended to constitute a waiver of each Party's
immunity under Washington's Industrial Insurance Act, chapter 51 RCW, respecting the
Page 13 of 18
other party only, and only to the extent necessary to provide the indemnified Party with a
full and complete indemnity of claims made by the indemnitor's employees. The Parties
acknowledge that these provisions were specifically negotiated and agreed upon by them.
(g) COUNTY and CITY agree to either self insure or purchase polices of insurance
covering the matters contained in this Agreement with coverages of not less than
$5,000,000 per occurrence with $5,000,000 aggregate limits including professional liability
and auto.
SECTION NO. 17: INITIATIVES AND LOCAL BUDGET REDUCTIONS
The Parties recognize that revenue-reducing initiative(s)passed by the voters of Washington
and/or local revenue reductions (i.e. loss of sales tax) and/or local government mandates
may substantially reduce local operating revenue for CITY, COUNTY or both Parties. The
Parties agree that it is necessary to have flexibility to reduce the contracted amount(s) in this
Agreement in response to budget constraints resulting from the passage of State-wide
revenue-reducing initiative(s) and/or local revenue reductions and/or local government
mandates. If such an event occurs, the Parties agree to negotiate in good faith to achieve a
mutually agreeable resolution in a timely fashion.
SECTION NO. 18: DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Any dispute regarding the interpretation of, failure to perform, or the costs for services
assessed under the terms of this agreement between the SHERIFF, COUNTY or CITY
which cannot be resolved between the respective parties shall be subject to arbitration.
Except as provided for to the contrary herein, such dispute shall first be reduced to writing
and considered by the COUNTY CEO ("Chief Executive Officer") and the City Manager if
it is a monetary dispute. If it is a non-monetary dispute, it shall be reduced to writing and
considered by the SHERIFF and City Manager. If the COUNTY CEO or SHERIFF
respectively and the City Manager cannot resolve the dispute it will be submitted to
arbitration.
COUNTY or SHERIFF, respectively, and CITY shall have the right to designate one person
each to act as an arbitrator. The two selected arbitrators shall then jointly select a third
arbitrator. The decision of the arbitration panel shall be binding on the Parties and shall be
subject to judicial review as provided for in chapter 7.04A RCW.
The costs of the arbitration panel shall be equally split between the respective Parties.
SECTION NO. 19: ASSIGNMENT
Page 14 of 18
No party may assign in whole or part its interest in this Agreement without the written
approval of the other Parties. Nothing in this section shall prohibit COUNTY or SHERIFF
from contracting with third parties for services provided for in this Agreement.
SECTION NO. 20: NOTICES
All notices called for or provided for in this Agreement shall be in writing and must be
served on any of the Parties either personally or by certified mail, return-receipt requested,
sent to the Parties at their respective addresses herein above given. Notices sent by certified
mail shall be deemed served when deposited in the United States mail,postage prepaid.
SECTION NO. 21: VENUE STIPULATION
This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and delivered
within the State of Washington and it is mutually understood and agreed by each Party
that this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington, both as to
interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity or judicial proceeding for
the enforcement of this Agreement, or any provision hereto, shall be instituted only in courts
of competent jurisdiction within Spokane County, Washington.
SECTION NO. 22: COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
The Parties shall observe all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, to the
extent that they may be applicable to the terms of this Agreement.
SECTION NO. 23: DISCLAIMER
Except as otherwise provided, this Agreement shall not be construed in any manner that
would limit either Party's authority or powers under law.
SECTION NO. 24: HEADINGS
The Section and subsection headings appearing in this Agreement have been inserted solely
for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall
not be deemed to, define, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they
pertain.
SECTION NO. 25: ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN
This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the Parties. No other
understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be
deemed to exist or to bind any of the Parties. Parties have read and understand the whole of
Page 15 of 18
the above Agreement and now state that no representations, promises or agreements not
expressed in this Agreement have been made to induce either to execute the same.
SECTION NO. 26: COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in any number of multiple signed originals, each of
which, when so executed and delivered, shall be an original, but such counterparts shall
together constitute but one and the same.
SECTION NO. 27: AGREEMENT TO BE FILED
COUNTY shall file this Agreement with such offices or agencies as required by chapter
39.34 RCW.
SECTION NO. 28: TIME OF ESSENCE OF AGREEMENT
Time is of the essence of this Agreement and in case any Party fails to perform the
obligations on its part to be performed at the time fixed for the performance of the
respective obligation by the terms of this Agreement, the other respective Party may, at
its election, hold the other Party liable for all costs and damages caused by such delay.
SECTION NO. 29: CHAPTER 39.34 RCW REQUIRED CLAUSES
A. Purpose. See Section No. 3 above.
B. Agreement to be Filed. See Section No. 27 above.
C. Duration. See Section No. 4 above.
D. Termination. See Section No. 4 above.
E. Organization of Separate Entity and Its Powers. No new or separate legal or
administrative entity is created to administer the provisions of this
Agreement.
F. Responsibilities of the Parties. See applicable Sections within Agreement.
G. Property upon Termination. See Section Nos. 4.4 and 11 above.
SECTION NO. 30: SEVERABILITY
Page 16 of 18
The Parties agree that if any parts, terms or provisions of this Agreement are held by the
courts to be illegal, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected
and the rights and obligations of the Parties shall not be affected in regard to the remainder
of the Agreement. If it should appear that any part, term or provision of this Agreement is
in conflict with any statutory provision of the State of Washington, then the part, term or
provision thereof that may be in conflict shall be deemed inoperative and null and void
insofar as it may be in conflict therewith and this Agreement shall be deemed to modify to
conform to such statutory provision.
SECTION NO. 31: THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES.
This Agreement is intended for the benefit of COUNTY, CITY and SHERIFF and not for
the benefit of any third parties.
SECTION NO. 32. SURVIVAL
Without being exclusive, Section 16, 20, and 21 of this Agreement shall survive any
termination, expiration or determination of invalidity of this Agreement in whole or in
part. Any other Sections of this Agreement which, by their sense and context, are
intended to survive shall also survive.
SECTION NO. 33. MEDIA RELEASES
Media releases concerning law enforcement activities covered under this Agreement will
be prepared by the SHERIFF'S Public Information Officer. Any such release of
information to the media that is deemed to be sensitive or likely to cause concern or
alarm shall be provided to the City Manager before its release. CITY shall not issue any
media releases regarding law enforcement activities covered under this Agreement
without prior approval of the SHERIFF unless otherwise agreed by the Parties.
SECTION NO. 34: MODIFICATION
This Agreement may only be modified in writing by the mutual written agreement of the
Parties.
(This space intentionally left blank.)
Page 17 of 18
1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the
date and year opposite their respective signatures.
DATED: i /0__ ,\\ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
/=04 oosslo,��1 OF SPOKANE CO r'.. Y, HINGTON
le"E CO�j�. �J. �)
/ 0 4!
■ `° : MARK RICHARD hair
ATTEST: �4, • '�' ,• '�
CLERK OF THE B iel;`„;” --1111111/4)_,L i,� _ / 114.-.
����,, ,,-,: BONNIE MAGER, Vice- h.:1,
;`+ .� / /Ilse''._._1 ,
DANIELA E' CKSON / ,)&t. ice'
JO O `7' °7 TO D II MIELKE, Commissioner
**********
DATED: &t'{ a /' zoo SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF:
r
0 A E 4'0 VICH
* ********
DATED: atird--- //, �1/21 CITY OF SPO.•.-.•' VALLEY:
K/
ii: '9
Y/
c), KE JACKS P 'nterim City Manager
-HRISTINE BAINBRIDGE
City Clerk
Approved as to form o :
, it, #. i
O fice of the City Attorney
Page 18 of 18
Sheriffs Office-2010
Commissioned Officer Worksheet
Total Commissioned FTE: 236.00
Total included in Commissioned Officer Charge: 217.67
Excludes those allocated along with administrative costs and those that are County responsibility.
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4
Dedicated FTEs Shared Services Allocated with County Responsibility/
Investigative/ Administrative Costs Other Cost Recovery Method
Note:"Unincorporated"here includes small cities. Community Services/K-9
Unincorp Valley Medical Lk Deer Park Total Major Crimes Civil
Admin Captain 1 Lieutenant
Chief/Inspector 1 I 1 Lieutenant 1 Deputies 3
Sergeant 1 1 Sergeant 1 Command Staff
Lieutenant 0.25 0.75, I 1 Detectives 5 Undersheriffs 2 Marine Patrol
Deputy 0.25
Patrol Sex Crimes PIO
Captain 1 1 Sergeant 1 Sergeant 1 1 DEA
Lieutenant 2 2_1 4 Detectives 5.84 Detective/Corp 1
Sergeant 7 6 = 13 Training/OPS
Detective/Corp. 4 6 10 Property Crimes TF Lieutenant 2 DTF
Deputies 52 44' _ 5 2 103 Sergeant 1 Sergeant 1 Detective/Corp 1.50
Detectives 4 Deputies i 2 Deputies 0.75
Traffic/CVEO Deputies 3
Sergeant - 1 j 1 Sex Off.Res.Verif.
Detective/Corp. 2 1 j 3 ISU/CIU/DEC/JTTF/Meth%/DTF% Detective/Corp 0.16
Deputies 7 5:;! 12 Lieutenant 1.00
Sergeant 1.00 Sex Off.Res.Verif.SA03 -
Property Crimes Detectives 6.83 Detective/Corp 1.00
_
Sergeant - �, . 1 Deputies 2.25 P
Detective/Corp. 3 ..._, „ 9 WA Meth Grant
Gang Enforcement _ Detective/Corp 0.67
Community Services Sergeant _ 1.00
Deputy I MEM I I 2 Detective/Corp 2.00 Child Sex Pred Grant
Deputies 1.00 Deputy 1 1
Domestic Violence Total Investigative 37.92
Detective/Corp. 1 i
1 Admin
Deputy _ 1 Intellelligence Led Policing Sheriff I 1
Deputies 1
SRO
Deputies 3 1 8 Marine/Search Rescue
Deputies 1.75
Total Dedicated FTEs 83.25 80.75 5 3 172 K-9 Total Administrative 8 Total County/Other 10.33
Deputies 5
Dedicated FTEs excluding SROs 80.25 76.75 5 2 164
Total Investigative/Support Sery 45.67
City 2010 Final CCM 06-30-10(4) Comm Officer Worksheet
Exhibit 1 Services
The COUNTY will provide law enforcement services consisting of the following:
Category 1 —Dedicated FTE's
• Valley Police Administration
• Patrol
• Traffic Investigation
• Property Crimes
• Community Services
• Domestic Violence Unit
• School Resource Officer
Category 2—Shared Services Investigative/Community Services/K-9
• Major Crimes
• Sex Crimes
• Property Crimes Task Force
• Investigative Support Unit
• Criminal Intelligence Unit
• Drug Endangered Children Detective
• Joint Terrorism Task Force
• Meth Detective
• Drug Task Force
• Gang Enforcement
• Intelligence LED Policing
• Marine/Search and Rescue
• K-9
Category 3 —Allocated with Administrative Costs
• Administration-Undersheriff and Staff
• Public Information Officer
• Office of Professional Standards and Training
Category 4—County Responsibility or Other Cost Recovery Method
• Civil Process
• Marine Patrol Grant
• DEA Grant
• Drug Task Force Grant
• Sex Offender Registration
• Sex Offender Residency Verification Grant
• WA Meth Grant
• Child Sex Predator Grant
• Sheriff
Law Enforcement Services Allocated by Various Basis
• SCOPE/SIRT
• Radio Dispatch
• Helicopter
• Forensics
• Crime Check
• Records Management
• Property Room
• Explosive Disposal
• Communications
Law Enforcement Services included in the Per Commissioned Officer Rate
• LEIS
• Crime Analysis Unit
• Garage
• Firing Range
• Fleet
• SWAT/Hostage Negotiation
• Extra Duty Employment
• Reservist and Explorer Units
• Countywide Indirect Costs—OMB A-87
• Annual Changes in Accrued Leave
Spokane County Sheriffs Office Type of Allocation:
Law Enforcement Cost Allocation Model A-87
Summary of Client Charges
Based on 2008 Actuals Other
Actual Allocations
Summary-Budget Other Allocations Total 3.25% 1.250% BUDGET 3.25% 1.250% BUDGET
Other Charge 2009 2009 2009 2010 2010 2010
Allocations for 2008 COLA MULTIPLIER CONTRACT COLA MULTIPLIER CONTRACT
Spokane 1,562,405 1,562,405 50,778 20,165 1,633,348 53,084 21,080 1,707,512
Spokane Valley 2,189,664 2,189,664 71,164 28,260 2,289,088 74,395 29,544 2,393,027
Deer Park 112,040 112,040 3,641 1,446 117,127 3,807 1,512 122,446
Millwood 60,011 60,011 1,950 775 62,736 2,039 810 65,585
Spangle 4,036 4,036 131 52 4,219 137 54 4,410
Rockford 10,615 10,615 345 137 11,097 361 143 11,601
Airway Heights 68,715 68,715 2,233 887 71,835 2,335 927 75,097
Fairfield 7,543 7,543 245 97 7,885 256 102 8,243
Liberty Lake 73,889 73,889 2,401 954 77,244 2,510 997 80,751
Medical Lake 43,760 43,760 1,422 565 45,747 1,487 590 47,824
Latah 2,280 2,280 74 29 2,383 77 31 2,491
Waverly 1,648 1,648 54 21 1,723 56 22 1,801
Cheney 15,213 15,213 494 196 15,903 517 205 16,625
Fairchild AFB 3,073 3,073 100 40 3,213 104 41 3,358
Unincorporated County 3,231,984 3,231,984 105,039 41,713 3,378,736 109,809 43,607 3,532,152
Total 7,386,876 7,386,876 240,073 95,337 7,722,286 250,974 99,666 8,072,926
County Responsibility/Other Cost Recovery - 41,541,344 41,541,344 1,350,094 536,143 43,427,581 1,411,396 560,487 45,399,464
Total Costs Net of Revenues - 48,928,220 48,928,220 1,590,167 631,480 51,149,867 1,662,371 660,153 53,472,391
Commissioned Officer Rate 125,295 4,072 1,617 130,984 4,257 1,691 136,932
City 2010 Final CCM 06-30-10(4) 2008 Actuals to 2011 w Multplrs Exhibit 2
Sheriffs Office-2010
Commissioned Officer Worksheet
Total Commissioned FTE: 236.00
Total included in Commissioned Officer Charge: 217.67
Excludes those allocated along with administrative costs and those that are County responsibility.
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4
Dedicated FTEs Shared Services Allocated with County Responsibility/
Investigative/ Administrative Costs Other Cost Recovery Method
Note:"Unincorporated"here includes small cities. Community Services/K-9
Unincorp Valley Medical Lk Deer Park Total Major Crimes Civil
Admin Captain 1 Lieutenant -
Chief/Inspector 1 1 Lieutenant 1 Deputies 3
Sergeant 1 j.. 1 Sergeant 1 Command Staff
Lieutenant 0.25 0.75':. 1 Detectives 5 Undersheriffs 2 Marine Patrol
Deputy 0.25
Patrol Sex Crimes PIO
Captain 1 1 Sergeant 1 Sergeant L— _ 1 DEA
Lieutenant 2 2 _ 4 Detectives 5.84 Detective/Corp 1
Sergeant 7 6 _ 13 Training/OPS
Detective/Corp. 4 6: 10 Property Crimes TF _ _ Lieutenant 2 DTF
Deputies 52 44T 5 2 103 Sergeant 1 Sergeant 1 Detective/Corp 1.50
Detectives 4 Deputies 2 Deputies 0.75
Traffic/CVEO Deputies 3
Sergeant - 1_J 1 Sex Off.Res.Verif.
Detective/Corp. 2 1 1 3 ISU/CIU/DEC/JTfF/Meth%/DTF% Detective/Corp 0.16
Deputies 7 5 12 Lieutenant 1.00
Sergeant 1.00 Sex Off.Res.Verif.SA03
Property Crimes _ Detectives 6.83 Detective/Corp 1.00
Sergeant - 1 1 Deputies 2.25
Detective/Corp. 3 6; 9 WA Meth Grant
Gang Enforcement Detective/Corp ( 0.67
Community Services Sergeant 1.00
Deputy L. _ 1 MEM 1 2 Detective/Corp 1 2.00 Child Sex Pred Grant
Deputies 1.00 Deputy 1
Domestic Violence Total Investigative 37.92
Detective/Corp. 1 _ 1 Admin
Deputy 1 1 Intellelligence Led Policing Sheriff 1
Deputies 1
SRO
Deputies 3 4 1 8 Marine/Search Rescue
Deputies 1.75
Total Dedicated FTEs 83.25 80.75 5 3 172 K-9 Total Administrative 8 Total County/Other 10.33
Deputies 5
Dedicated FTEs excluding SROs 80.25 76.75 5 2 164
Total Investigative/Support Sery 45.67
City 2010 Final CCM 06-30-10(4) Comm Officer Worksheet
Spokane County Sheriff's Office Type of Allocation:
Law Enforcement Cost Allocation Model A-87
Allocation of Commissioned Officers Between Unincorporated and Small Cities _
Based on 2008 Actuals
% of Regular
Population Total Officers Unincorp.
Unincorporated - District 8 11,066 86.9% 5.22 5.22
Millwood 1,665 13.1% 0.78
Total District 8 12,731 6.00
Unincorporated - District 10 14,739
Unincorporated - District 11 10,824
Total Unincorporated-Dist 10 & 11 25,563 93.8% 11.25 11.25
Spangle 275 1.0% 0.12
Rockford 499 1.8% 0.22
Fairfield 603 2.2% 0.27
Latah 1 194 0.7% 0.09
Waverly 127 0.5% 0.06
Total Districts 10 and 11 27,261 100.0% 12.00
Unincorporated - Districts 8,10,11 16.47
Unincorporated -other than Dist. 8,10,11 62.25
Total Unincorporated without small cities 78.72
Population numbers used 2008 statistics
City 2010 Final CCM 06-30-10 (4) Small Cities
111 IIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
.1.1 .1
Spokane County Sheriff's Office -- T of Allocation:
Law Enforcement Cost Allocation Model --I.-:1,14.2 ,_iLf
_
Commissioned Officer Summary �_-_ -
Based on 2008 Actuals
----
Commissioned Officers Dedicated to Local Jurisdictions ___
FEMAirway Liberty Medical Fa Unincorporate Commissioned Total --
Deer Park Millwood Spangle Rockford Heights Fairfield Lake Lake Latah Wave Effl AFB d Coun Total Costs Officer Rate FTE
Dedicated FTES exduding SROs 2.00 0.78 0.12 0.22 0.27 5.00 0.09 0.06--11- 164.00
School Resource Officers r r 1.00 1 /1 rr 8.00
Total Dedicated FTEs 3.00 0.78 0.12 0.22 - 0.27 - 5.00 0.09 0.06 00.1111ESEM 172.00
•
Catego 2
• _ 2.03 _ 0.75 0_09 0.87 - .-_.0.08 ;t1� 0.04 0.02 - - 46.70 101.989
Total Investi.ative Dollars 103,096.44 38,132.96 4,734.80 44 344.20 - 4 072.95 - 101 823.65 2 240.12 1 221.88 - - 2 377,429.38 5,192,445.87 136,932 37.92
Statistic:K-9 2,570.00 28.00 31.00 - 1.00 4.00 2.00 5.00 1.00 - - 2.00 1.00 1,139.00 3,782.00
Total K-9 Dollars 465 248.79 4 706.80 5 611.95 - 181.03 724.12 362.06 905.15 181.03 - 362.06 181.03 206-1-93.92 684,657.95 136,932 6.00
.111.11=1111=11 /11.11 .1IMIIII. =1. 11111111
Intellelligence Led Pollcin: III. ---
Dedicated FTEs exdudin.SROs IN ilaa 2.00 0.78 0.12 0.22 - 0.27 - 5.00 0.09 0.06 - 0MEIME1 164.00
176,226.36 4,592.22 1 801.75 277.95 504.35 609A7 - 11,480.54 196.08 128.36 00 180 744.78 376,561.87 136,932 2.76 .
Total lnvestie ative/K-9/Community Services Costs 3,156 824.66 112 398.46 45,547.44 5 012.87 45,029.80 724.12 5,044.74 905.15 113,490.22 2,436.29 1,350.30 362.06 '®' 2,7 -_ - 217.67
Statistics for Avg RMS&Cases and K-9 from 2008 Actuals
IINIMIIMIMMII Estimated Medical Lake ----
City 2010 Final CCM 06-30-10(4) 2010 Comm Officer Summary
Spokane County Sheriffs Office Type of Allocation:
Law Enforcement Cost Allocation Model I. A-87
Commissioned Officer Rate and Allocation L
Based on 2008 Actuals
2010 Allocation of Commissioned Officer Charge
Dedicated Investigative School SRO Total
Dedicated Commissioned Community Sery Resource SRO Contract Net SRO Commissioned
Officers Officer Charge K-9 Charge Officers Charge Revenue Charge Officer Charge
Spokane
Spokane Valley 76.75 10,509,499 3,156,825 4.00 547,726 67,056 480,670 14,146,995
Deer Park 2.00 273,863 112,398 1.00 136,932 16,764 120,168 506,429
Millwood 0.78 107,450 45,547 - - 152,997
Spangle 0.12 16,576 5,013 - - - - 21,589
Rockford 0.22 30,078 45,030 - - - - 75,107
Airway Heights - - 724 - - 724
Fairfield 0.27 36,346 5,045 - - 41,391
Liberty Lake - - 905 - - 905
Medical Lake 5.00 684,658 113,490 - - 798,148
Latah 0.09 11,694 2,436 - - - - 14,130
Waverly 0.06 7,655 1,350 - - 9,005
Cheney - - 362 - - 362
Fairchild AFB - - 181 - - 181
Unincorporated County 78.72 10,778,962 2,764,450 3.00 410,795 50,292 360,503 13,903,914
Total All Jurisdictions 164.00 22,456,781 6,253,757 8.00 1,095,453 134,112 961,341 29,671,878
Commissioned Officer Rate
Total Commissioned Officers Serving Local Jurisdictions 217.67
2008 Actuals for Commissioned Officer Rate with Multipliers I 136,932
City 2010 Final CCM 06-30-10(4) 2010 Commissioned Officer Alloc
Spokane County Sheriffs Office
Law Enforcement Cost Allocation Model
Summary of Client Charges
Based on 2008 Actuals
Actual Settle and
Commissioned Total Adjust
Officer Other Charge PAID 2010
Charge Allocations for 2008 2008 CONTRACT
Spokane - 1,562,405 1,562,405
Spokane Valley 13,018,019 2,189,664 15,207,683 - -
Deer Park 470,641 112,040 582,681
Millwood 143,142 60,011 203,154
Spangle 20,113 4,036 24,149
Rockford 73,329 10,615 83,944
Airway Heights 663 68,715 69,377
Fairfield 37,962 7,543 45,505
Liberty Lake 828 73,889_ 74,717
Medical Lake 166 43,760 43,925
Latah 13,060 2,280 15,340
Waverly _ 8,299 1,648 9,947
Cheney 331 15,213 15,545
Fairchild AFB 166 3,073 3,238
City 2010 Final CCM 06-30-10 (4) 2008 Settle and Adjust
Spokane County Sheriffs Office Ty.e of Allocation:
Law Enforcement Cost Allocation Model A-87
Summary of Client Charges
Based on 2008 Actuals
2008
Summary-Charges to Clients Commissioned Total Settle &Adjust Total Monthly
Officer Other Contract Budget Carry Forward Contract Budget Billing
Charge Allocations for 2010 2010 Including Carry Forward 2010
Spokane - 1,707,512 1,707,512 - 1,707,512
Spokane Valley 14,146,995 2,393,027 16,540,021 - 16,540,021 1,378,335
Deer Park 506,429 122,446 628,875 - 628,875
Millwood 152,997 65,585 218,583 - 218,583
Spangle 21,589 4,410 25,999 - 25,999
Rockford 75,107 11,601 86,708 - 86,708
Airway Heights 724 75,097 75,821 - 75,821
Fairfield 41,391 8,243 49,634 - 49,634
Liberty Lake 905 80,751 81,656 - 81,656
Medical Lake 798,148 47,824 845,972 - 845,972
Latah 14,130 2,491 16,621 - 16,621
Waverly 9,005 1,801 10,807 - 10,807
Cheney 362 16,625 16,988 - 16,988
Fairchild AFB 181 3,358 3,539 - 3,539
City 2010 Final CCM 06-30-10 (4) Total Budgetfor 2010
August 23, 2010
City of Spokane Valley
11707 E Sprague Ave. Suite 106
Spokane, Valley,WA 99206
Attn.: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Dear Christine:
Enclosed is the following item for your file:
• (Duplicate Original) "Interlocal Agreement for Costs Incident to
Law Enforcement Services in the City of Spokane Valley."
Sincerely,
Pia Kammers
Office Assistant o/b/o Clerk of the Board
Spokane County Commissioners
End.
SiS
Of
ne
41 .Valiey°
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 1 cityhall®spokanevalley.org
March 27, 2014
Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich
1100 West Mallon
Public Safety Bldg, First Floor
Spokane, WA 99260-0300
Dear Sheriff Knezovich,
Based upon a joint effort of the City of Spokane Valley and the Spokane County
Sheriffs Office, and following approval by the Spokane Valley City Council, I am
pleased to request the following changes to the City's law enforcement services. The
changes were mutually agreed upon in a meeting between the City and the Sheriffs
Office held on February 26, 2014 and are pursuant to Section 5.1 of the Interlocal
Agreement for Costs Incident to Law Enforcement Services in the City of Spokane
Valley. A
1. Adjust the service level FTEs set forth in Category One of Exhibit 1 of the
Agreement by adding two (2) Patrol Deputies increasing the total patrol deputies
by two (2).
2. Eliminate the position of Patrol Corporal from the dedicated patrol positions for
Spokane Valley and use the six (6) Corporal positions to create two (2) additional
Property Crime Detectives, one (1) new Patrol Deputy to work the Power Shift,
and three (3) Patrol Sergeants. All these positions would be dedicated to the
City of Spokane Valley Police Department.
3. Transfer three (3) Detectives from Shared Investigative Services to Category 1
and combine with the existing Spokane Valley Property Crimes Unit of six (6)
Detectives and one (1) Sergeant, and enhance by transferring two (2) Patrol
Corporal positions to Property Crime Detectives. This new unit will investigate
both property crimes and drug crimes and will be comprised of one (1) Sergeant
and eleven (11) Detectives, all of whom will be located at the Valley Precinct, and
will be dedicated to Spokane Valley.
4. Form a Patrol Power Shift by taking one (1) Deputy from each of the four (4)
existing patrol platoons, adding the two (2) new Patrol Deputies, and adding one
1
10-1b`
(1) Deputy from the ranks of Corporal, creating a platoon of seven (7) Deputies
who will work 10 hour shifts. Police Chief VanLeuven and Lt. Lyons have
identified 3:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. as the best time for this shift. The shift schedule
may be modified in the future to match the peak call-load period. The assigned
staffing levels associated with the Power Shift will be three (3) Deputies on
Monday, Tuesday, and Sunday; four (4) Deputies on Wednesday, Thursday, and
Friday; and seven (7) Deputies on Saturday. The minimum staffing levels of the
Power Shift will be two (2) Deputies on Monday, Tuesday, and Sunday; three (3)
Deputies on Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday; and five (5) Deputies on
Saturday.
This letter serves as formal notification of the above listed requests pursuant to Section
5 of the Interlocal Agreement. The City Council of the City of Spokane Valley has
authorized these requests and the costs associated with them.
Thank you for your continued support in providing Law Enforcement services to the City
of Spokane Valley.
Sincerely,
--� /2//77/7
Mike . :ckson, City Manager
Cc: Marshall Farnell, CEO
Approved by
2f eriff Ozzie Knezovich Date
2