Loading...
06-012 District Court, Misdemeanor & Gross Misdemeanor • Return to: Daniela Erickson, Clerk of the Board Board of County Commissioners 1116 W. Broadway Spokane,Washington 99260 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR COSTS hNCIDENT TO ADJUDICATION OF MISDEMEANOR AND GROSS MISDEMEANOR OFFENSES IN THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY (January 1,2005—December 31,2005) 6 0190 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and among the Spokane County District Court, having offices for the transaction of business at 1100 West Mallon, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as "COURT," Spokane County; a political subdivision of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 1 1 16 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY," and the City of Spokane Valley, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at the Redwood Plaza, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206, hereinafter referred to as"CITY,"jointly hereinafter referred to as the "PARTIES." The COUNTY, COURT and CITY agree as follows. SECTION NO. 1: RECI IALS AND FINDINGS (a) The Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County has the care of County property and the management of County funds and business under RCW 36.32.120(6). (b) Counties and cities may contract with each other to perform certain functions which each may legally perform under chapter 39.34 12CW(1.nterlocal Cooperation Act). (c) Pursuant to the provisions of RCW 39.34.180, the City of Spokane Valley is responsible for the costs incident to investigation, prosecution,adjudication and incarceration of misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor offenses that occur within its jurisdiction and that are committed by adults. (d) Spokane County has established the COURT under the provisions of chapter 3.38 RCW for the judicial administration of the laws of the State of Washington and the ordinances of Spokane County. The COURT consists of one district encompassing all of Spokane County. (e) The City of Spokane Valley desires to utilize the services of the COURT for the purpose of adjudicating and sentencing cases which occur within the City of Spokane Valley and inlet-local Agreement District Court Page 1 of 16 C06-12 • • are referred to the COURT where the charge is (i) an infraction and/or (ii) a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor offense committed by an adult, and/or (iii) a violation of the City of Spokane Valley's ordinances which constitutes a misdemeanor, unless filed with a felony. SECTION NO.2: DEFiNITIONS (a) Agreement: "Agreement" means this Interlocal Agreement between the CITY, COURT and COUNTY regarding Court Services. (b) Ci "CITY" means the City of Spokane Valley. (c) County: "COUNTY"means Spokane County. (d) Maintenance and Operations: "Maintenance and Operations" and "M&O" shall mean (I) those class codes (3000-5999 and 7000-9999) used by Spokane County in its budgetary process as prescribed by the BARS manual adopted by the State of Washington under chapter 43.88 RCW so long as such expenditures are directly attributable and proportionate to services rendered to CITY under the terms of this Agreement. (e) Services: "Services"means those services identified in Exhibit 1. (f) Compensation: "Compensation" means that methodology set forth in Exhibit 2 used to establish the amount of money which the CITY will pay the COUNTY for providing Services. (g) Capital Improvement: "Capital Improvement" shall mean any expenditure in excess of $1999.99 or such higher figure as set by the COUNTY as the capitalization threshold during the term of the Agreement. The COUNTY shall give the CITY advance notice of any increase in the capitalization threshold. The PARTIES agree to meet and discuss the impacts of any change in the' capitalization threshold which 'will cause an increase of costs to the CITY In excess of $50,000.00. Any such expenditure will be coded as provided for in the BARS-manual adopted by the State of Washington under RCW 43.88. (h) Uncontrollable Circumstances: "Uncontrollable Circumstances" means the following events: riots, wars, civil disturbances, insurrections, acts of terrorism, external fires and floods, volcanic eruptions, lightning or earthquakes at or near where the Services are performed and/or that directly affect providing of such Services. (i) Court: "Court" means the Spokane County District Court established under chapter 3.38 RCW. 6) Report: "Report" means the District Court Filing/Revenue Report. SECTION NO.3: PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to reduce to writing the PARTIES' understanding as to the terms and conditions under which the COURT will provide Services on behalf of the CITY. It is the intent of the Interlocal Agreement District Court Page 2 of 16 • PARTIES that Services to be provided by the COURT will be consistent with the CITY'S Council/Manager form of government provided for in chapter 35A.I3 RCW subject to applicable Court Rules. SECTION NO.4: DURATION/WITHDRAWAL This Agreement shall commence on January I,2005,and run through December 31, 2005. At the conclusion of the initial term, this Agreement shall automatically be renewed from year to year thereafter effective January r to December 31' All renewals shall be subject to all terms and conditions set forth herein except for Exhibit 2. The PARTIES recognize it highly unlikely that Exhibit 2 setting forth the new billing rates for each year's Services will be available at the start of any renewal time frame. Accordingly, until a new Exhibit 2 has been prepared and agreed to between the PARTIES, the PARTIES agree that the COUNTY will bill the CITY and the CITY will pay the COUNTY at the same billing rates paid in the previous year. Upon the PARTIES agreement on a new Exhibit 2, the CITY and COUNTY will reconcile payments to date under the previous years billing rates with the new billing rates.Any underpayment for any Services will be due in the first payment due following reconciliation. Any overpayment for any Services will be credited to the first monthly payment due following the reconciliation. The PARTIES agree that no interest shall be owing by either Party to the other Party for any overpayment or underpayment determined as a result of the reconciliation. Any Party may withdraw at any time from this Agreement for any reason whatsoever upon a minimum of 180 days written notice as provided for in Section 7 to the other Party. SECTION NO.5: COST OF SERVICES ANi)PAYMENTS The CITY shall pay the COUNTY the actual costs for Services provided under this Agreement. The estimated cost: for 2005 Services under this Agreement shall be as set forth in Exhibit 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The methodology uses the last. six (6) months of Report numbers for 2003 and first six (6) months of Report numbers for 2004 and averages them for a twelve (12) month time frame. The resulting number is used as a basis to estimate the 2005 cost of services. The COUNTY CEO shall advise the CiTY Manager as soon as possible of any anticipated or unanticipated capital improvement costs that: arise during the contract period. The City shall pay capital improvement costs either (1) under the Cost. Allocation Plan as an indirect cost amortized over the useful life of the improvement utilizing straight- line depreciation and incorporating the expected salvage value of the improvement at the end of its useful life or (2) as a direct cost in the form of a contribution made to the Equipment Rental and Revolving Fund. The CITY shall he responsible only for capital improvement costs incurred after March 31, 2003. Any portion of a capital improvement that was paid for or acquired through separate agreement or with grant proceeds, bond proceeds, user fees, donations, or any other acquisition method that reflects a contribution on behalf of CITY shall not be included in the depreciation schedule applied to the CITY. . Any capital improvement for which the COUNTY seeks reimbursement from the CITY must be necessary to fulfill the requirements of this Agreement. At the end of the calendar year, using the methodology set forth in Exhibit 2 the PARTIES shall apply the actual expenditures and the actual usage percentage to determine the final cost. It is the PARTIES intent that any adjustment take place as soon as possible and accordingly will use their respective best efforts to Interlocal Agreement District Court Page 3 of 16 timely prepare, disseminate and review all expenditure documentation. The CITY will have sixty (60) calendar days from its receipt of the expenditure documentation to provide the COUNTY with any written objections(s) to such documentation. The written objection(s) must specifically identify the expenditure(s) in question. The COUNTY agrees to consider all written objections received from the CITY within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the objections(s). In the event that the PARTIES cannot mutually resolve any written objection(s) submitted by the CiTY within the thirty (30) calendar days time frame, or such other time frame as the PARTIES may mutually agree, the objections shall be resolved pursuant to the Dispute Resolution provisions set forth in Section No. 17. Pending resolution of the objections(s), the PARTIES agree that the CITY shall pay that portion of the bill that is undisputed. To the extent that the CITY was over billed in any year and the Agreement is still in effect, the COUNTY shall credit the CITY for such overpayment in the next monthly payment owning by the CITY. Provided, however, in the event the Agreement is terminated at such time that the overpayment is determined, the COUNTY shall reimburse the CiTY for any overpayment within thirty (30) calendar days. To the extent that the CiTY was under billed in any year and the Agreement is still in effect,die CITY shall reimburse the COUNTY for any under payment in die next monthly payment owing by the CITY. Provided, however, in the event the Agreement is terminated at such time that the underpayment is determined, the CITY shall reimburse the COUNTY for any underpayment within thirty(30)calendar days. Either Party may at its sole option charge interest on any overpayment or underpayment based on lost interest earning had the amount determined due been invested in the respective PARTIES investment pool at the end of the thirty (30) day time frame provided for hereinabove to the date of payment. Any resolution of a disputed amount through use of the arbitration process identified in Section 17 shall include at the request of either Party, a determination of whether interest is appropriate, including the amount. The COUNTY will bill the CiTY for the cost of services as outlined, monthly, by the l5th of the month. Monthly payments for Services will be calculated by dividing those annual costs set forth in Exhibit 2 by twelve(12). Payments by the CITY will be due by the 5th day of the following month. The COUNTY,at its sole option, may charge interest on any late payment calculated on any lost interest earning had the amount due been invested since the date due to the date of payment in the COUNTY's investment pool. SECTION NO. 6: RELATED RESPONSIBILITIES IN CONJUNCTION wrrx PROVIDING SERViCES • The COURT or its designee agree to attend staff meetings as requested by the CITY Manager. The COURT or its designee agree to meet upon request by the CITY Manager or his/her designee to discuss any Service provided under the terms of this Agreement. The CITY agrees the COURT may use the COURT'S stationery in conjunction with providing Services under the terms of this Agreement. SECTION NO. 7: NOTICE All notices or other communications given hereunder shall be deemed given on: (1) the day such notices or other communications are received when sent by personal delivery; or(ii)the third day following the day on which the same have been mailed by first class delivery, postage prepaid addressed to the COUNTY or the Interlocal Agreement District Court Page 4 of 16 CITY at the address set forth below for such Party, or at such other address as either Party shall from time- to-time designate by notice in writing to the other Party: COUNTY: Spokane County Chief Executive Officer or his/her authorized representative 1 116 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 COURT: Presiding Judge, Spokane County District Court 1100 West Mallon Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 CITY: City of Spokane Valley City Manager or his/her authorized representative Redwood Plaza 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite I06 Spokane Valley, Washington 99206 SECTION NO. 8: REPORTING Reports — The COURT shall provide the CITY with reports documenting actual usage under this Agreement. The Parties agree that the terminology "reports documenting actual usage" means that type of information provided by the COURT to the CITY in the 2004 agreement for Services. An updated report shall be submitted quarterly unless otherwise mutually agreed by the Parties. Such reports shall be in a format as mutually agreed to between the Parties. The content and/or format for such reports may be changed from time-to-time by written agreement between CITY and COURT staff. Records Review—The CITY shall be allowed to conduct random reviews of the records generated by the COURT in performance of this Agreement. The CITY will provide the COURT with reasonable advance notice of the records reviews. The Parties agree that they will make best efforts to achieve a resolution of any potential records confidentiality issues, including entering into confidentiality agreements or other similar mechanisms that will allow disclosure of the necessary information to accurately conduct a records review. If the CITY will be allowed to view only those records directly relating to Services provided within CITY's corporate boundaries, then the COURT must keep a log of original documents used to charge the CITY, and those documents must have identifying numbers or letters so the original source documents can be easily retrieved. SECTION NO.9: COUNTERPARTS • This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which, when so executed and delivered,shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same. SECTION NO. 10: ASSIGNMENT No Party may assign in whole or part its interest in this Agreement without the written approval of the other PARTY. lnterlocal Agreement District Court Page 5 of 16 SECTION NO. 11: COUNTY EMPLOYEES The COURT shall hire, assign, retain and discipline all employees performing Services under this Agreement according to applicable collective bargaining agreements and applicable state and federal laws and court rules including but not limited to GR 29. The COURT agrees to meet and confer with the CITY with respect to staff that is assigned to provide Services. Issues of discipline or performance will be specifically handled according to COURT policies. SECTION NO. 12: LIABILITY For the purpose of this Section,the terminology"COUNTY"shall also include the"COURT." (a) The COUNTY shall indemnify and hold harmless the CiTY and its officers, agents,and employees, from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of any negligent act or omission of the COUNTY, its officers, agents and employees, relating to or arising out of performing Services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such claim, action, loss, or damages is brought against the CITY, the COUNTY shall defend the same at its sole cost and expense; provided that the CITY reserves the right to participate in said suit if any principle of governmental or public law is involved; and if final judgment in said suit be rendered against the CITY, and its officers, agents, and employees, or jointly against the CITY and the COUNTY and their respective officers, agents,and employees,the COUNTY shall satisfy the same. (b) The CITY shall indemnify and hold harmless the COUNTY and its officers,agents,and employees, from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of any negligent act or omission of the CITY, its officers,agents and employees, relating to or arising out of performing Services pursuant to this Agreement. in the event that any suit based upon such claim, action, loss, or damages is brought against the COUNTY, the CITY shall defend the same at its sole cost and expense; provided that the COUNTY reserves the right to participate in said suit if any principle of governmental or public law is involved; and if final judgment in said suit be rendered against the COUNTY, and its officers, agents, and employees, or jointly against the COUNTY and the CITY and their respective officers, agents, and employees, the CITY shall satisfy the same. (c) if the comparative negligence of the Parties and their officers and employees is a cause of such damage or injury, the liability, loss, cost, or expense shall be shared between the Parties in proportion to their relative degree of negligence and the right of indemnity shall apply to such proportion. (d) Where an officer or employee of a Party is acting under the direction and control of the other Party, the Party directing and controlling the officer or employee in the activity and/or omission giving rise to liability shall accept all liability for the other Pasty's officer or employee's negligence. (e) Each Party's duty to indemnify shall survive the termination or expiration of the Agreement. (f) The foregoing indemnity is specifically intended to constitute a waiver of each Party's immunity under Washington's Industrial Insurance Act, chapter 51 RCW, respecting the other party only, and only to the extent necessary to provide the indemnified Party with a full and complete indemnity of claims made by . the indemnitor's employees. The PARTIES acknowledge that these provisions were specifically negotiated and agreed upon by them. interlocal Agreement District Court Page 6 of 16 (g) The COUNTY and the Cli'Y agree to either self insure or purchase policies of insurance covering the matters contained in this Agreement with coverages of not less than S5,000,000 per occurrence with S5,000,000 aggregate limits including professional liability and auto liability coverages. SECTION NO. 13: RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES The PARTIES intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. The COURT shall be an independent contractor and not the agent or employee of the CITY, that the CITY is interested only in the results to be achieved and that the right to control the particular manner, method and means in which the services are performed is solely within the discretion of the COURT. Any and all employees who provide Services to the CITY under this Agreement shall be deemed employees solely of the COURT. The COURT shall be solely responsible for the conduct and actions of all employees under this Agreement and any liability that may attach thereto. Likewise, no agent, employee, servant or representative of the CiTY shall be deemed to be an employee, agent, servant or representative of the COURT or COUNTY for any purpose. SECTION NO. 14: MODIFICATION This Agreement may be modified in writing by mutual written agreement of the PARTIES. SECTION NO. 15: PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT The ownership of all property and equipment utilized in conjunction with providing the Services shall remain with the original owner, unless otherwise specifically and mutually agreed to by the PARTIES to this Agreement. For the purpose of this section, the terminology "owner" means that Party which paid the full purchase price for the property or equipment. SECTION NO. 16: ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREINBINDING EFFECT This Agreement contains terms and conditions agreed upon by the PARTIES. The PARTIES agree that there are no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement. No changes or additions to this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon the PARTIES unless such change or addition is in writing,executed by the PARTIES. This Agreement shall be binding upon the PARTIES hereto,their successors and assigns. SECTION NO. 17: DISPUTE RESOLUTION Any dispute between the COUNTY and CITY including but not limited to cost of Services which cannot be resolved between the COUNTY and CiTY shall be subject to arbitration. Except as provided for to the contrary herein,such dispute shall first be reduced to writing. if the COUNTY CEO and the CITY Manager cannot resolve the dispute it will be submitted to arbitration. The provisions of chapter 7.04 RCW shall be applicable to any arbitration proceeding. The COUNTY and the CITY shall have the right to designate one person each to act as an arbitrator. The two selected arbitrators shall then jointly select a third arbitrator. The decision of the arbitration panel shall be binding on the PARTIES and shall be subject to judicial review as provided for in chapter 7.04 ROW. lnterlocal Agreement District Court Page 7 of 16 • The costs of the arbitration panel shall be equally split between the PARTIES. The PARTIES acknowledge that the provisions of this section are not applicable to the COURT. GR 29 precludes the COURT from delegating any of its administrative duties addressed in that rule to the legislative or executive branches of government. The COURT.agrees, however, in the event of a dispute with the CITY to meet and in good faith attempt to resolve the dispute. This paragraph would not preclude the PARTIES from using this Section to resolve disputes over the calculation of costs of Services provided under this Agreement. SECTION NO. 18: VENUE STIPULATION This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and delivered within the State of Washington and it is mutually understood and agreed by each party that this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington both as to interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity or judicial proceeding for the enforcement of this Agreement, or any provision hereto, shall be instituted only in courts of competent jurisdiction within Spokane County, Washington. SECTION NO. 19: SEVERABILITY The PARTIES agree that if any parts, terms or provisions of this Agreement are held by the courts to be illegal, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected and the rights and obligations of the PARTIES shall not be affected in regard to the remainder of the Agreement. If it should appear that any part, term or provision of this Agreement is in conflict with any statutory provision of the State of Washington, then the part, term or provision thereof that may be in conflict shall be deemed inoperative and null and void insofar as it may be in conflict therewith and this Agreement shall be deemed to modify to conform to such statutory provision. SECTION NO.20: RECORDS All public records prepared, owned, used or retained by the COURT in conjunction with providing Services under the terms of this Agreement shall be deemed COURT property and shall be made available to the CITY upon request by the CITY Manager subject to the attorney client and attorney work product privileges set forth in statute, court rule or case law. The COURT will notify the CITY of any public disclosure request under chapter 42.17 RCW for copies or viewing of such records as well as the COURT'S response thereto. SECTION NO.21: RE.A.DiNGS The section headings appearing in this Agreement have been inserted solely for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall not be deemed to define, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they pertain. SECTION NO. 22: TiME OF ESSENCE OF AGREEMENT Time is of the essence of this Agreement and in case any Party fails to perform the obligations on its part to be performed at the time fixed for the performance of the respective obligation by the terms of this Agreement, the other Party may, at its election, hold the other Party liable for all costs and damages caused by such delay. Interlocal Agreement District Court • Page 8 of 16 SECTION NO. 23: UNCONTROLLABLE CIRCUMSTANCES/IM.POSSI.I3ILITY A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement resulting from Uncontrollable Circumstances shall be deemed not a default under this Agreement. A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement resulting from any change in or new law, order, rule or regulation of any nature which renders providing of Services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement legally impossible, and any other circumstances beyond the control of the COUNTY/COURT which render legally impossible the performance by the COUNTY/COURT of its obligations under this Agreement, shall be deemed not a default under this Agreement. SECTION NO. 24: FILING This Agreement shall be filed by the COUNTY with such offices or agencies as required by chapter 39.34 RCW. SECTION NO.25: EXECUTION AND APPROVAL The PARTIES warrant that the officers executing below have been duly authorized to act for and on behalf of the Party for purposes of confirming this Agreement. SECTION NO.26: INI 1 IATI VES The PARTIES recognize that revenue reducing initiative(s) passed by the voters of Washington may substantially reduce local operating revenue for the CITY, COUNTY or both PARTIES. The PARTIES agree that it is necessary to have flexibility to reduce the contracted amount(s) in this Agreement in response to budget constraints resulting from the passage of revenue-reducing initiative(s). If such an event occurs, the PARTIES agree to negotiate in good faith to achieve a mutually agreeable resolution in a timely fashion. SECTION NO.27: COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The PARTIES shall observe all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, to the extent that • they may be applicable to the terms of this Agreement. • SECTION NO. 28: DISCLAIMER Except as otherwise provided, this Agreement shall not be construed in any manner that would limit either Party's authority or powers under laws. SECTION NO. 29: ASSURANCE The CITY shall pay the COUNTY the true and full cost of all Services provided under this Agreement. The intent of the Parties is that neither Party will subsidize the other and that the CITY will not subsidize any other jurisdiction that is receiving similar services. Interlocal Agreement District Court Page 9 of 16 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have caused this Agreement to be executed on date and year opposite their respective signatures. DATED: "'U Y'>h_1 LA ,f3Crlo BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON o� COMA4 �� s � ,1 - S�90 piit:CpG 701.''14/ TO$ IP 4IELKE, Chair i O .'4 �p ABSENT ATTEST: �of '• ' • % MARK RICHARD, Vice-Chair •Clerk of the Board f'r� �� sEna. .•' 41"tuvt " -Ct. ___- _ . . . .. _ _ . .Daniela Erickson ' ' !(lr. HARRIS, Commissioner DATED: 7,7 (o& SPOKANE COUN-► li ." CT C URT i y By: _t;14 / I Its: ' ° CD td ,� , __�. ,t', DATED: 31 i lei CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY si),...... A. .../.."Leke_a A,�.ES..„ David Mercier,City Manager � ,� !h Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY: • -n-1-44.-itg Office of e City y Attorn y • lnterlocal Agreement District Court Page 10 of 16 EXHIBIT 1 Court Services shall include the adjudication and sentencing by the Spokane County District Court of • matters which occur within the City of Spokane Valley and are referred to the Spokane County District Court where the charge is (i) an infraction and/or (ii) a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor offense committed by an adult; and/or(iii) a violation of the City of Spokane Valley ordinances which constitutes a misdemeanor, unless filed with a felony. • Interlocal Agreement District Court Page 11 of 16 Exhibit 2 Spokane County Spokane Valley District Court 2005 Contract Component A Component B Component C Budget Allocable to Percentage Misdemeanor Services* City of Spokane Valley *1 Contract Amount Salary 2,81 8,555 19.92%_" 561,462 M&O 173,315 1992%, 34,525 Indirect Costs••s 596,970 19.92% 118,918 3,588,840 I 714,904 Notes * Component A represents District Court's budget,less civil,felony&Spokane City Intcrlocal. See Attachment A ** Component A multiplied the Component B equates the contract amount. Sec Attachment A. ***.The Indirect(Overhead)rate of 21.18%is applied to salaries only. The indirect rate is based on Spokane County's 0Ml3 A-87 Indirect Cost Plan Escalated 2003 for 2005(2005 SRB) prepared by PRM Group,an independent plan preparer. Interlocal Agreement District Court Page 12 of 16 • SPOKANE COUNTY SPOKANE VALLEY DISTRICT COURT STATISTICS AND CALCULATIONS 2005 CONTRACT Attachment A District Court Case Statistics Offcn+c Category Spokane Vnllcy• Spokane County" NVeip,ht(flours) SV Hours SC(lours SV% Infractions 11,799 59,709 121 26,076 131,957 ISV-Misdemeanor 400 927 75.64 30,256 70,118 DUI 178 2,793 71.32 12,695 199,197 Criminal Traffic 1,661 5,443 12.41 20,613 67,548 Criminal Ng.(less misd DV) 769 2,776 17.36 13,350 48,191 Salnntrd 14,807 71,648 102,990 517,0111 19.92%1 • See Attachment 13 •'See Attachment C Misdemeanor/Infraction Expenditure Calculation Salary and Benefits i■1&U Total Expenditures 4,493,138 271,462 4,764,600 Less:Civil••• tt.45% (514,319) (31,074) (545,392) Less:Felony••• 1.48% (66,558) (4,021) . (70,580) Less:City of Spokane"" (1,093,706) (63.052) (1,156,758) Misd/Infrac Total 2,818.555 173,315 2,991,870 ••• See Attachment D •••• Estimated 2005 City of Spokane Interlocal Contract Spokane Valley Cost Calculation M Went envoi r/ Percentage Infraction Budget Spokane Valley Actual Cost ,Misdtlnfrac Salary S.Benefits 2,818,555 19.92% 5.61,462 Mild+lnfr c M fi n 173,315.27 19.92% 34.525 2,991,870 595.986 Indirect Costs (21.18%) 596,970 19.92% 118,918 Total 3,588,840 714,904 Interlocal Agreement District Court • Page 13 of 16 tr > 116 r, eo G Attachment B DISTRICT COURT 2003 last 6mos/2004 first 6te09 .�+ FILING/REVENUE REPORT C.) Ccateinti City of Spokane valley jurisdiction (ocly) 0 ; JAN FM 10,RC91 ARM. t1AY ,3m13 MAY A08217 570r 0e7 NOV WC 707AL9 Pillage (section source; 31$Cost1343 report) I317RAC71011 2033 0 0 0 795 647 1.405 1,085 1,030 661 1,190 841 1,066 2034 847 734 1,199 992 958 1,035 874 789 1,187 1.095 11,790 Change 992 32% -22% -20% -26% 33% -8% category.canine Infraction Traffic, Inr%action 1ilf1 7 ffic, snd Infraction.?>z .'A4 0'n•I 2003 0 0 0 11 17 17 17 36 13 B 50 24 2004 15 18 21 12 15 15 4 13 12 10 179 0Ienue 0% •12% -41% •78% -13% -5% 2516 CStIM YR 2003 0 0 0 117 102 199 152 135 112 168 138 169 Comore 130 113 179 182 033 64 23 32 41 35 1,661 Change 38% 30% -67% -85% -76% -631k -79% C9121 N7 • 2003 0 0 0 7D 57 96 103 102 104 90 53 92 (69016D/3 2034 93 87 130 102 90 112 106 109 00 95 1.189 ritonoe 31% •1% 17% 3% 6% -23% 7% F ir- s 14,807 tfiseem 0V• 2003 0 0 0 14 42 33 38 35 26 22 17 27 2604 28 37 39 32 34 51 45 51 30 37 400 Change -D% -19% 5596 60% 31% 15% 16% , yelaey eve 2003 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2004 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 `_ Change 1otaI D1"• 2003 0 0 0 30 44 53 58 39 27 32 17 27 2004 29 37 30 32 34 51 45 51 31 37 0 0 402 —4 (twee 0 -16% -2345 55% 18% 31% 15% 16% 3✓ • 07 counts are a auloet of (are 100 included in) the criminal sort/ono abara. 7Z ID A 0 ■.1 • T • • 3' 6 et ta at -1 r5 r, Attachment C C7 DISTRICT COURT 2003 last Enos/2004 first Eros FILING/REVENUE REPORT r; Contains ALL jurisdictions (Unincorporated, Civil, Spokane Valley, cad Liberty take) JAN FHB MARCH APRIL 10,Y JUNE FAX MUST SHPT OCT 11•7 DEC YOCALS . - C n Filings (section actuate: JIS Caseload report) INF"VACTIC4 2003 6,208 6.282 6,564 593 I 5,858 6,981 4,842 5,141 5.208 4,8A7 3,887 4,823 2904 4,205 4,346 6,276 5,198 4,814 6,022 4,875 5,353 6,573 5,159 59,709 Change -32% -3i% 4% 5,198 -18% -14% 1% 4% 29% 5% catemry caTbines Infraction Traffic, .Tr,fractic7 Akan Traffic, one infraction Parking 0aT ' 2003 222 209 204 155 167 204 151 210 383 2.43 185 361 2004 184 246 268 195 194 194 158 165 214 106 2,703 (lance -17% 16% 30% 26% 16% -556 3% -21% -41% -ms cum I'31 2703 442 411 463 460 460 559 485 420 454 461 376 558 Grime 466 408 572 49) 472 223 99 126 143 151 5,443 Change 5% 14% 24% 7% 3% -60% 80% -79% -69% 467.% C2Ix NT • 2003 270 277 345 288 342 372 328 315 326 297 212 341 • (rcl175) . 2004 242 277 337 337 353 353 312 294 239 262 3,703 Chat!oe -10% 0% -2% 17% 3% -9% a% -7% -27% -12% Flings 71,848 Atirde DV• 20103 83 70 08 73 94 86 60 100 73 82 45 78 - 2004 65 87 79 72 78 89 103 97 69 76 927 Change -22% 24% -11% -1% -17% -7% 29% -3% -5% -7% Felary D7• 2003 30 41 48 44 48 42 46 55 47 49 32 51 2004 38 33 47 53 43 47 40 83 02 58 532 Change -3% -20% 2% 20% -7% 12% -13% 15% 32% 40% so Total DV' 2003 122 i11 134 117 140 138 126 155 12D 172 77 129 (to 2004 103 120 125 125 121 138 143 100 131 132 0 0 1,459 � thange 805% 8% -7% 7% -14% -1% 13% 3% 976 3% C •D7 taunts are a subset of (are ales included in) the criminal cow-traffic section above. M as SPOKANE COUNTY SPOKANE VALLEY DISTRICT COURT FELONY/CIVIL STAFFING % 2005 CONTRACT Attsichment D SPOKANE VALLEY FELONY STAFFING COST Salary at %FTE of Average Benefits at %FTE of Total Salary& Position % FTE Position Average Position Benefits at %FTE Commissioner 0.2 20,138.14 3,727.49 23,865.63 Bailiff 0.2 5,478.77 2,780.42 8,259.19 0A4 0.6 15,595.61 6,716.94 22,312.55 Court Clerk 0.3 8,539.37 3,581.71 12,121.08 66,558.45 SPOKANE VALLEY CIVIL/SMALL CLAIM STAFFING COST Salary at %FTE of Average Benefits at %FTE of Total Salary & Position % FTE Position Average Position Benefits at %FTE Judge 1.0 1 18,458.00 21,083.98 139,541.98 Commissioner 0.2 20,138.14 3,727.49 23,865.63 Bailiff I.2 33,246.52 16,308.63 49,555.15 Civil/SC Staff 7.0 206,234.92 95,120.84 301,355.76 514,318.52 CALCULATION OF SPOKANE VALLEY FELONY AND CIVIL STAFFING % Budgeted Salary & Benefits Felony % 4,493,138 66,558.45 1.48% Civil % 4,493,138 514,318.52 11.45% Interlocal Agreement District Court Page 16 of 16 •