Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
06-040.00 ECO Northwest: Sprague Appleway Corridor Subarea Plan
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ECONorthwest Tl-1_lS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Spokane Valley, a code City of the State of Washington, hereinafter "City" and ECONorthwest hereinafter "Consultant," jointly referred to as "parties." IN CONSIDERATION of the terms and conditions contained herein the parties agree as follows: 1. Work to Bc Performed. The Consultant will furnish all equipment, supplies, material and labor as identified in the Scope of Work, attached to this Agreement and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 1. The City Manager or designee shall administer and be the primary contact for Consultant. Prior to commencement of work, Consultant shall contact the City Manager or designee to review the scope of work, schedule and date of completion. Upon notice from the City, Consultant shall commence work, perform the work, stop work and promptly cure any failure in performance under this agreement. All work shall be perfonnedpursuant to adopted City standards, policies or as otherwise set forth in this agreement. Consultant shall exercise best efforts so that all work performed shall be in compliance with current related industry standards. Modifications The City may modify this agreementand order changes in the work whenever necessary or advisable. The Consultant will accept modifications when ordered in writing by the City Manager or designee. Compensation for such modifications or changes shall be as mutually agreed between the parties. The Consultant shall make such revisions in the work as are necessary to correct errors or omissions appearing therein when required to do so by the City without additional compensation. 2. Term of Contract. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect upon execution and shall be completed by the 1st day of June, 2007. Either party may terminate this Agreement by ten (10) days written notice to the other party. In the event of such termination, the City shall pay the Consultant for all work previously authorized and satisfactorily perfonned prior to the termination date. 3. Compensation. The City agrees to pay the Consultant $428,972.00 as full compensation for everything furnished and done under this agreement in accordance with provisions outlined in the Scope of Work. Agreement for Services with ECONorthorthwest Page I of 5 C06 -40 Phase 1: 5 69,450 Phase Il: $221,094 Phase Ill : $138.428 Total Compensation $428,972 4. Payment. Applications for payment shall be sent to the City Clerk at the below stated address. The City reserves the right to withhold payment under this agreement which is determined in the reasonable judgment of the City Manager to be noncompliant with the scope of work, City Standards, City ordinances and federal or state standards. 5. Notice . Notice shall be given in writing as follows: TO THE CITY: TO THE CONSULTANT: Name: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Name: Terry Moore, Principal Phone Number: (509) 921 -1000 Phone Number: (541) 687 -0051 Address: 11707 East Sprague Ave, Suite 106 Address: 99 W. 10`" Avenue, Suite 400 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Eugene, OR 97401 -3001 6. Applicable Laws and Standards The parties, in the performance of this agreement, agree to comply with all applicable Federal, State, local laws, City ordinances, and regulations. 7. Relationship of the Parties. It is hereby understood, agreed and declared that the Consultant shall be an independent contractor and not the agent or employee of the City, that the City is interested in only the results to be achieved and that the right to control the particular manner, method and means in which the services are performed is solely within the discretion of the Consultant. Any and all employees who provide services to the City under this agreement shall be deemed employees solely of the Consultant. The Consultant shall be solely responsible for the conduct and actions of all employees under this agreement and any liability that may attach thereto. 8. Ownership of Documents. All drawings, plans, specifications, and other related documents prepared by the Consultant under this agreement are and shall be the property of the City, and may be subject to disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.17 or other applicable public record laws. Notwithstanding any assignment of Contractor's copyright to the work produced pursuant to this Agreement, City grants to Contractor the nonexclusive, perpetual right and license to use the work for educational, promotional, or academic purposes, and, in addition, unless specifically otherwise exempted, Contractor may use standard text, line drawings, specifications, models, and calculations on other, unrelated projects. 9. Records. The City or State Auditor or any of their representatives shall have full access to and the right to examine during normal business hours all of the Consultant's records with respect to all matters covered in this contract. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, Agreement for Services with ECONorthorthwest Page 2 of 5 examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls and record of matters covered by this contract for a period of three years from the date final payment is made hereunder. 10. Consultant to Be Licensed And Bonded. The Consultant shall be duly licensed and bonded by the State of Washington. 11. Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. Consultant's maintenance of insurance as required by the agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Consultant to, the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types described below: A. Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non - owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. The automobileliability policy shall have a minimumcombined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident B. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors and personal injury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an insured tinder the Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City. The commercial general liability insurance policy shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $2,000,000 policy aggregate limit. C. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington, as applicable to this agreement. D. Professional Liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant's profession, with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions for automobile liability, professional liability, and commercial general liability insurance: A. The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respect the City. Any insurance, self - insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. B. The Consultant's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Consultant before commencement of work. 12. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, orders, decreesor judgments for injuries, death or damage to any person or property arising or resulting from any negligent actor omission on the part of the Consultantor its agents, employees or volunteers in the performance of this Agreement, including attorney fees, and except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. 13. Waiver. No officer, employee, agent or other individual acting on behalf of either party has the power, right or authority to waive any of the conditions or provisions of this agreement. No waiver in one instance shall be held to be waiver of any other subsequent breach or nonperformance. All remedies afforded in this agreement or by law, shall be taken and construed as cumulative, and in addition to every other remedy provided herein or by law. Failure of either party to enforce at any time any of the provisions of this agreement or to require at any time performance by the other party of any provision hereof shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of such provisions nor shall it affect the validity of this agreement or any part thereof. 14. Assignment and Delegation. Neither party shall assign, transfer or delegate any or all of the responsibilities of this agreement or the benefits received hereunder without first obtaining the written consent of the other party. It is understoodby the Parties that certain portions of the work to be performed will be subcontracted to other parties, as set forth in Exhibit 1, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 15. Jurisdiction and Venus. This Contract is entered into in Spokane County, Washington. Venue shall be in Spokane County, State of Washington. 16. Cost and Attorney's Fccs. In the event a lawsuit is brought with respect to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be awarded its costs and attorney's fees in the amount to be determined by the Court as reasonable. Unless provided otherwise by statute, Consultant's attorney fees payable by the City shall not exceed the lump sum amount of this agreement. 17. Confidentiality. Consultant may from time to time receive information which is deemed by the City to be confidential. Consultant shall not disclose such information without the express written consent of the City or upon order of a Court of competent jurisdiction. 18. Entire Agreement. This written agreement constitutes the entire and complete agreement between the parties and supersedes any prior oral or written agreements. This Agreement may not be changed, modified or altered except in writing signed by the parties hereto. 19. Anti - kickback. No officer or employee of the City, having the power or duty to perform an official act or action related to this Agreement shall have or acquire any interest in this Agreement, or have solicited, accepted or granted present or future gift, favor, service or other thing of value from any person with an interest in this Agreement. 20. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Agreement should be held to be invalid for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Agreement. 21. Business Registration. Prior to commencement of work, Consultant shall register with the City as a business. 22. Exhibits. Exhibits attached and incorporated into this agreement are: 1. Scope of Work; 2. Insurance Certificates. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement this //?�-day of /� _, 2006. CIT F SPOKANE VALLEY: City Manager A S . This document contains confidential tax information and has been redacted pursuant to RCW 82.32.330. You may petition for a review of our findings pertaining to any redacted or withheld documents pursuant to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 2.75.080; and obtain judicial review pursuant to RCW 42.56.550. CONSULTANT: Qr r Owner /Autho zed Agent Tom) '"` V( Tax I.D. No.: I t'? d �o APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorn The City of Spokane Valley The Sprague /Appieway Corridor Subarea Plan Community Vision, Plan Framework, Regulatory Policy Et Implementation Plan Scope of Services 4 May 2006 Proiect Overview The Sprague/Appleway Corridor Revitalization Strategy and Subarea Plan project will determine and implement a clear vision for growth and change along the Sprague/Appleway Corridor — probably the most visible portion of the City of Spokane Valley. The Corridor includes properties facing and between Sprague and Appleway, from 1 -40 on the west to Sullivan on the east. The specific configuration that new public and private investment along the Corridor will take will be determined by a planning process involving city officials, citizens, stakeholders, and City Staff. Specifications to guide land use and development intensity, site layout., building design, site landscaping and signage will be detailed in the Sprague /Appleway Corridor Subarea Plan document. Land use and development standards contained in the Subarea Plan will be drafted to replace pre - existing zoning regulations, and to assist the community to more effectively attract investment and improve the evolving image and identity of the City. The consultant team (also referred to as the Consultant or the Project Team) consists of ECONorthwest (ECO), Freedman `lung & Bottomley (FTB), Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc. (GJ), and Studio Cascade (SC). Meeting Types Core Team Composition and Working Sessions To achieve the benefits that the professional city staff members can contribute to the planning effort, we recommend the assembly of a five to seven member "Core Team" to collaborate with the ECOIFTB consulting team throughout the project. Recommended mandatory members are the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director. Each should choose another member of his/her department to attend as well. Since traffic circulation is a very important issue in this project, the traffic engineer would be the recommended second representative from the Public Works Department. The City Manager's participation as a key member of the Core Team is also recommended. We also recommend the assignment of a Project Manager by the Community Development Director, who would be a member of the Core Team as well as the City's primary point of contact for regular project communications. The Core Team must be active at all key junctures of the project, attending all community workshops and City Council Study Sessions, participating in the Core Team Working Sessions (outlined below), and actively participating in the development or review of the Subarea Plan concepts and contents. The Core Team is responsible for coordinating with "Ton -Core Team" people in their own departments, bringing to Core Team discussions the perspectives of those "Non - Cores," and conveying to the Non -Cores the results of the Core Team process. It is essential to the continuity of the project and the Core Team's credibility with the rest of City Staff that the members of the Core Team do not change over the course of various project meetings. Core Team Working Sessions. As part of the Concept Phase, ECO and FTB will orchestrate a Core Team Working Session, focused on the review & analysis of existing conditions along the corridor, and on development of preliminary concepts for the primary organization of the centers and segments along the envisioned future Corridor. If time allows, preliminary transportation planning and street design issues supportive of the desired land use & development concepts will also be discussed. Prior to each Community Workshop, consultant presentations will be previewed by the Core Team to check for errors and to refine the presentation details. Later in the project, when the draft Subarea Plan is prepared, the Core Team will take primary responsibility for review of its contents and for coordinating its review with other member of City Staff. Each Core Team Working Session will involve the participation of the Core Team plus ECO /FTB team project staff as needed. In addition to intensive face -to -face Core Team Working Sessions, telephone conferences will be held with the Core Team at various junctures throughout the project to insure that staff and consultants are "on the same page" and to provide an opportunity to air ideas, concerns and to discuss project logistics. Focus Groups There are several important groups of stakeholders with an interest in the redevelopment of Sprague /Appleway Corridor. At the beginning of the second phase of the project, the ECO /FTB Team will hold a day of focused meetings with representatives of these groups to ensure that these key perspectives are understood by the consultant team. The exact make up of these meetings will be determined with City Staff in the early phases of the project but may include: representatives of Auto Row and other key land owners along the corridor, public transit agency staff and other institutional stakeholders, and key community representatives. Community Workshops. Community workshops are publicly noticed meetings open to anyone in the community who wishes to be a part of the planning for the Sprague/Appleway Corridor. The public participation process proposed herein has been developed over twenty years of community participation workshop facilitation by Freedman Tung & Bottomley. It is based on the observation that workshop participants will only enthusiastically support plans that they understand and believe in. Workshop series blend educational with participation techniques. Educational components are engaging presentations that bring participants up to speed with regard to the effective means by which properties can maximize their value while contributing to enhanced livability and city identity. City Council Study Sessions At key junctures in the development of the plan elements and outcomes, the Project Team will bring the recommendations developed thus far for informal review and discussion by the City Council. The purpose of these Study Sessions is to involve city decision -makers in the discussion of the contents of the plan as it is being developed rather than waiting to the end. These meetings are held in informal study session arrangement rather than in the more formal arrangement of typical public hearings. Study Sessions will ensure that we have City Council's advice and review both during and after key plan concepts are developed, so that we are certain that City Council members will ultimately receive a plan in the hearing phase that implements their vision for the Corridor. Deliverables and review The Consultants will provide the City with outlines of key documents in advance. The City and Consultant will agree on those outlines, which will then become part of the basis for determining the adequacy of the draft of each specified deliverable. For agreed upon deliverables, written and graphic, the Consultant will provide the City with a draft, and then with a final after receiving City comments. Final deliverables will generally be delivered within ten working days of receiving in writing from the City a single, consolidated set of comments that give clear direction on needed and desired changes. Some products will be delivered to the City at scheduled review meetings before Workshops: in that case, necessary revisions per the City request may occur after the ensuing Workshops. An accompanying table shows deliverables, meetings, and schedule. Overview of the Planning Process (Diagram) The accompanying diagram — Overview of the Planning Process — illustrates the choreography of these meeting types within each phase. It expresses the chronological order in which we intend to hold discussions with the community, develop preliminary content, and then review and refine that content in collaboration with the Core Team, in collaboration with citizens and, ultimately, with the City Council. Scope of Work, Sprague / Appleway Corridor ECONorthwest, May 06 Page 2 Work Program The Task List below describes the services to be carried out by the entire consulting ream. Tasks are listed in the chronological order that is assumed will be most cffootive for both the deveIopmeiit of planning & design solutions, as well as for the provision of satisfying process of col laboration with CJry Staff and cone nunity participation. As the project proceeds, the order of tasks may be modified to suit opportunities that arise during the course of the planning and design process. The dates below and in the attached schedule for del ivembles are approximate and assume thy. Consultant has authorization to begin work by May 15, 2006. PHASE 1. CLARIFYING COMMUNITY A P[RATTON AND DEFINING OPP RTUNME FOR -BENEFIC IA.L CHANCE (MAY — JULY, 2006) Purpose of this Prose, Develop an understanding of the existing conditions and the forces of development and uhangc that produced them. Involve the community in that learning process, ]]iscuss and clarify community aspirations for revitalization in the context of Ieaniing what can reasonably be accomplished, particularly in the near term_ Tas4c 1. Project 00 -up Project start -up tasks ertcompass administrative coordination between al] consulting firms and between the consulting team and City Staft, including the collection of required base infnrmation and maps ofthe study area, formation of the Cara Team, exchange of contact information, c mmunicadan& protocols and initia] meeting scheduling, Task 2. Exisfing Conditions inventory and Basemap Preparation Field Reconnaissance and Photogrsph3r FTB will conduct initial field reconnaissance, including preliminary assessment of apparent vulnerability to change, an inventory of development typos, and supple mejiLary photography (i.e. supplementary to the primary photographic record assembled by Studio Cascade) necessary, and will set up a project daobase of s ides, field Motes & sketches that can be made available to the team_ Policy Context Studio Cascade wiII obtain documents, studies and plans pertinent to the Spraguel Appleway Corridor (with assistance from ECO), concentrating R9 review on the policies, capital facilities and ]and use issues impacting the planning area. Studio Cascade will submit to the, pianning team our assessment oFthose issues, as wet I as a comprehensive collection of current photographs, to help inform the rest of the planning prow -ss. Studio Cascade will also compile and maintain a library of 0 1 S data provided by the City of Spokane Valley, making all the material available to the planning team as a coordinated 0 1S data set. Studio Cascade will asseinhie a report on the existing policy environment and its impact on ]and lose and capital facilities and will provide a collection of photographs of the study area illustrating iS9uas raised in the initial evaluation plus those areas likely to be studied in rn11re depth as the project continues. 1n addirion to receiving and reviowing the Summary Report on Previous Spraguel Appleway Corridor studies completed SC, FTB will review the zoning code and Comprehensivrj Plan, as well as any other policy documents conditioning duvulupment on Corridor properties. An Existing Zoning diagram will also be formatted to provide a comparison with policy change proposals developed in the second Phase of the Subarea flan project_ City Context tend Strucru re of Neighborhoods Contiguous wi the Corridor In consultation with city staff, FT8 will prepare diagrams illustrating the city context, as well as the neighborhood structure close in to the Corridor_ Existing & Planned Development The pattern of existing development — building footprints, users in existing buildings, and the pattern 0fstrects & blocks — will be partially mapped by City Staff and provided to the consulti rig tearn, SC will complete the mapping, adding building footprints, streets & blocks not included in the basemap provided by the City_ SC will a] so inventory and map ground- 1eve1 Scopc of Work, Sprague 1 Appleway Corridor ECONorthwest, May 06 Page 3 uses in existing buildings. FTB will provide SC with standard land use categories and corresponding color coding key, and will coordinate with SC regarding the organization of the electronic files into discrete layers of data. FTB will format the data received from SC into a variety of basemaps for use throughout the project. FTB will also receive and add to the mapped data any approved development projects not yet on the ground, and will review any unapproved major development proposals underway as provided by the City, so that development being contemplated by investors will be considered as part of the development of the plan framework. Right- of -Way: Streetscape Configuration Based on a dimensioned street right -of -way base map received from the City, FTB will prepare plan & cross - section diagrams of typical corridor segments for use in Core Team and Community Workshop presentations and discussions. These documents will also be forwarded to Glatting Jackson for their collaboration on street design issues. Character, Design and Historic Context and Public Realm The character, design and historic context of the Corridor will also be assessed. FTB will review information received from the City describing the urban design and architectural history of the City and Corridor, any existing or assembled inventory of significant (or favorite) buildings and places that are considered key contributors to the identity of the City. FTB will format these images for use in Community Workshops and in portions of the plan document to be assembled in Phase Ili. Mobility, . Access & Connectivity Gladding Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc. (GJ) will serve as the transportation liaison for the project to address mobility and access to meet the multimodal needs of the project and bridge the process with the City's Department of Public Works (DPW) and their consultants (it is assumed that coordination with transit agencies other than the City will be provided by DPW). The City will provide GJ with a scaled electronic aerial map of the City and a digital planimetric base map of the study area. GJ will plot this aerial and base map at various scales and use it to present the traffic analysis and design considerations developed during the project. Glatting Jackson will review relevant current data and background studies received from Spokane Valley DPW on corridor traffic, transit, pedestrian, and bicycle planning. Glatting Jackson will be provided existing and future year traffic data for those roadway segments and intersections within the study area. Traffic data will be obtained from the City of Spokane Valley and CH2M Hill. It is desired that traffic data collected be less than one year old. Roadway segment counts shall be ADT and include K and D factors. Intersection turning movement counts shall be for AM and PM peak. hours. Glatting Jackson will review CH2M Hill existing condition Synchro traffic simulation for the corridor. Glatting Jackson will use information and mapping provided by CH2M Hill to create an existing conditions map for vehicular, transit, pedestrian, and bicycle circulation patterns and amenity needs related to the redevelopment of the corridor. Glatting Jackson will coordinate to production of these maps with FTB and the City of Spokane Valley. F1'B will review information received from GJ, and will follow -up with questions and discussion as required. Utility lnfrustructure FTB will review infrastructure information, received from the City with regard to a utility infrastructure issues that might conceivably constrain development along the corridor. This is a very limited review; this Scope of Services assumes that any utility infrastructure planning that the City would like to address in the Subarea Plan will be provided by the City's DPW. Environmenta.VEcological Factors FTB will review reports received from the City about any soils contamination, Brownfield Sites or ecological factors that may be relevant to planning land use and development along the Corridor. Scope of Work., Sprague / Appleway Corridor ECONlorthwest, May 06 Page 4 Task 3. analysis of .Existing Conditions Market Opportunities & Constraints ECO will draft parts of a technical memorandum evaluating markets and City financial capacity and options. FTB will review the technical memorandum received from ECO and will discuss the contents and its implications for the Corridor revitalization strategy in a teleconference. Mobility: Traffic Capacity and Couplet Planning .Issues FTB will be briefed by the City, CI.12MI-lill, and/or GJ on couplet scenarios previously studied for the future corridor as well as with regard to existing or projected capacity constraints on future development or street design scenarios, and hold preliminary discussions with city staff and GJ about potential capacity constraints on development and street design as well as potential transit system effects on development. GJ, in conjunction with FTB, the City of Spokane Valley and CH2M, will create a transportation issues memorandum. This memorandum will document the issues needed to be addressed to create an integrated transportation and land use strategy for the redevelopment of the corridor. This memorandum will illustrate how transportation issues should be integrated into the planning effort as well as identifying areas of needed flexibility in the current transportation and land use expectations for the corridor. GJ will also provide as- needed informal teleconferences with FTB and the City of Spokane. Vulnerability to change FTB will conduct fieldwork to assess the apparent vulnerability of sites along the corridor. Apparent opportunity sites will be mapped and forwarded to the ECO and City Staff for review. These findings will be discussed as needed and modified based on the response from ECO and City Staff . Street design character and functionality assessment F fB will assess the character and functionality of the existing street design along various typical segments of Sprague Avenue and Appleway Boulevard. PHASE II: ENVISIONING THE FUTURE CORRIDOR - PLAN CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT (JULY 2006 TO JANUARY 2007) Purpose oJthis Phase: Investigate potential futures for the Corridor and the new City Center, focusing particularly on developing recommendations that will serve to enhance the economic prospects for the corridor, that will put the high quality of the community on display and that will enhance the overall identity of the central spine of the City. Assist the community to understand the various directions that it can reasonably aspire to grow and change, and to evaluate those options with respect to potential impacts on the form, character and economy of the city. Assist the community to select the best possible (and achievable) future, to define that direction in sufficient detail, and to describe it in a way that is appealing to potential investors. Task 1. Focus Groups ECO, FTB, GJ and SC — with the assistance of City Staff — will conduct a half- day -long series of focus groups with auto dealership owners and other stakeholder groups to gamer their perspective about the future of the Corridor. Task 2. Core Team (City- Staff+ Consultants) Full Day Working Session (same trip as Focus Groups) At the completion of the existing conditions inventory & analysis, but prior to the development of any consultant recommendations or alternatives, the consultant team will join the City Staff Core Team for a full day working session. This meeting will happen as part of the same trip the Consultants make for the Focus Groups (Task 1). The purpose of this working session will be to develop a shared approach to the primary issues and questions on which the project will initially focus, such as the alternative locations for the City Center district, the primary options for ftiture neighborhood centers, the ability to realistically plan for Corridor segments that are internally consistent and cohesive in terms of use and physical form, and preliminary perspectives with regard to the extension or non - extension of Appleway to Sullivan Road. ECO will coordinate meeting logistics with City Staff, and FTB will prepare basemaps and a PowerPoint file/presentation on existing conditions for use during the day. Scope of Work, Sprague / Appleway Corridor ECONorthwest, May 06 Page 5 If alternative transportation solutions are identified at this stage of the process, GJ will coordinate with CH21MHill on the development of alternative corridor micro- simulations. Task 3. Corridor Centers & Segments: "Broad- Brush" Alternatives and Tradeoffs Based on the plan concepts developed in the Core Team Full Day Working Session (Task 2, above), FTB will develop and diagram corridor -scale alternatives and tradeoffs for the retrofitting of the broad pattern of land use & development along the corridor. These preliminary concepts will include alternate locations for the new City Center district, and the pattern of centers and long corridor segments that correspond to alternate city center locations (as well as other factors). FTB will assemble photographs from their library to illustrate the type of development corresponding to these broad -brush concepts. FTB will also prepare diagrams illustrating the recommended plan area boundaries (i.e. the boundaries of the area that the Subarea Plan will be applied to). Finally, FTB will prepare cross- sections of the development corridor to demonstrate existing and desired relationships of new development to the thoroughfare. ECO will complete the economic, market, and financial analysis. ECO will prepare a technical memorandum, suitable as an appendix to the final plan, describing economic, market, and financial conditions (past, existing, and likely future), and the implications for the type and location of development in different parts of the Corridor. Glatting Jackson will coordinate the evaluation of the initial transportation framework with testing and evolution of the overall framework with FTB and the City of Spokane Valley and CH2M Hill. This on -going task will also coordinate alternative micro- simulations (if necessary) with CH2►M Hill, the City of Spokane Valley and FTB. Studio Cascade will assist ECO and FTB as necessary to act as project liaison and to attend meetings and present project information to local civic groups, agencies and others as determined in the public participation program. They will periodically review proposed designs and implementation plans to ensure compliance with the State's growth management act and prevailing local laws and policies and will work with the consultant team to identify priority projects and establish specific action strategies to guide implementation. This Task includes the development of all necessary diagrams and photographs necessary for presentation and discussion at Community Workshop #l, to be prepared primarily by FTB. Task 4. Community Workshop #1: "Broad-Brush" Alternatives & Tradeoffs ECO and FTB will prepare a workshop process and needed presentation and other materials to engage workshop participants in a review and discussion of potential futures for the overall broad pattern of land use & development along the Corridor. ECO and FTB will take part in a review session with the City Staff Core Team on the day of the workshop. In the evening, ECO and FTB will set -up, present and facilitate Community Workshop #1. The Team will record comments made by workshop participants and transmit a record of these comments to the City. Task 5. Centers: Conceptual Alternatives for City Center and Neighborhood Centers FTB and ECONorthwest will participate in a teleconference to consult with City Staff Core Team about the most desirable and achievable anatomy of the new City Center district, and will discuss the economics, land use and development patterns related to the overall pattern of envisioned centers (i.e. City Center plus neighborhood centers) along the Corridor. The refinement of the location and configuration of the neighborhood centers identified in the Comprehensive Plan will also be discussed. Based on this conversation as well as on the results of Community Workshop #l, FTB will prepare diagrams, illustrations, and recommendations for the design of City Center and for the development parameters of the neighborhood centers, and will assemble photographs corresponding to the envisioned development contained in these recommendations, as needed. FTB will also refine the "Broad- Brush" Centers & Segments diagrams, originally prepared in Task 4 per community workshop & City Staff direction. . Task 6. Community Workshop #2: Envisioning the City's New Centers FTB will prepare a workshop presentation and materials to distribute as well as coordinate logistics with Team. FTB and ECO will take part in a review session with the City StafTCore Team on the day of the workshop and then attend, set -up, and facilitate community workshop #2. Concepts for the composition and location of the City's new centers will be presented and then discussed. During the workshop, the consulting team will record comments and as a follow -up they will transmit these comments to ECO for distribution to the Core Team. Scope of Work, Sprague / Appleway Corridor ECONorthwest, May 06 Page 6 Task 7. Joint City Council & Planning Commission Study Session On the evening immediately following the second Community Workshop, the ECO /FTB Team will present the results of the community workshops and a progress report on the evolving plan framework and the alternatives under review at a Joint City Council & Planning Commission Study Session. The purpose of this session is to inform the City Council as to the primary conceptual direction that the project has taken thus far, and to avail the City Staff /Consulting Team of any comments that Councilmembers or Commissioners might have at this formative stage in the project. The objective is to make sure that Councilmembers generally approve of the contents of the preliminary plan framework or to receive direction from City Council as to the changes that need to be made to the primary plan concepts in order for Councilmembers to be able to support the ultimate plan contents that will come back to them at various stages later in the project. Task 8. Develop/Refine Street Design and Transportation Planning Concepts Core Team Working Session. FT13 and GJ will participate in a transportation and design work session with the City Staff Core Team. This work session will focus on the development and /or refinement (depending on what was developed in the Task 2 Core Team Full Day Working Session, described above) of design solutions for the Corridor that support the envisioned City Center, neighborhood centers, cohesive long corridor segments developed in the earlier sessions. Design solutions to be discussed at the session will include intersection modifications, roadway streetscape, pedestrian amenities and potential bicycle facilities. Subsequent to the Work Session, FTB will prepare street design diagrams, illustrations, and recommendations, and will collaborate with G1 in the assembly of photographs corresponding to street design recommendations. Task 9. Community Workshop #3 — Street Resign and Transportation Planning in Support of the Community's Vision for the Corridor FTB will coordinate workshop logistics and presentations with City Staff& GJ, especially presentation regarding couplet configuration options, if appropriate. FTB will collaborate with GJ on a joint presentation of the primary alternatives and recommendations. On the day of the Community Workshop, FTB and GJ will present all recommendations to the City Staff Core team for review and comment, and in the evening the consulting team will set up, present, facilitate, and record participant comments at the third Community Workshop. Task 10. Complete Plan Framework: Prepare final concept level recommendations, diagrams, and illustrations At the outset of this task, the consultant team will conduct a Working Teleconference to discuss refinements to the final concept level recommendations, diagrams, and illustrations. The masterplan for City Center will be refined and modified per the input received at this meeting, as well as from Community Workshops 2 and 3, and will be forwarded to ECO for pro forma analysis. F'1 "13 will discuss the findings of that analysis with ECO and will prepare a modified City Center Master Plan recommendation if the pro forma analysis leads us to conclude that adjustments are necessary. FTB will prepare key policy recommendations and illustrations for segments of the Corridor based on the "broad- brush" centers and segments decisions made earlier and on the results of the community workshop series and Core Team discussions. Additional relevant photos corresponding to envisioned development types for centers and segments will be assembled as needed. Transportation planning, street design and other capital improvement recommendations will be modified, refined and finalized in consultation with GJ. Task 1l. Joint City Council & Planning Commission Study Session ECO and FTB will present the results of the community workshops and our recommended plan framework for the Corridor at a Joint City Council & Planning Commission Study Session. The purpose of this session is to inform the City Council as to the primary conceptual direction that the project has taken, and to summarize the comments received from community workshop participants relative to those recommendations. The primary purpose of this Study Session is to make sure that Councilmembers approve the primary recommendations "in concept," or to take direction from City Council as to the changes that need to be made to the primary plan concepts in order for Councilmembers to approve the Subarea Plan's intent. This stage of plan concept review is critical prior to the preparation of any draft Subarea Plan documents, in order to avoid major delays and costs associated with the more typical process of City Council review of detailed policy proposals in the Public Hearing Phase. Scope of Work, Sprague / Appleway Corridor ECONorthwest, May 06 Page 7 PHASE III: IMPLEMENTING COMMUNITY INTENT — THE SUBAREA PLAN (FEBRUARY — MAY 2007) Purpose of this Phase: Having defined the desired future beneficial growth and change for the Corridor and designated City Center location, collaborate with City Staff to define the means by which it can most effectively work toward the attainment of that future. Develop policy tools that can be used at the City's Planning Desk to insure that private investment takes the desired physical form. Prepare materials that will encapsulate the community's vision for revitalization. Clarify the public investment that the community intends to implement over time to stimulate and complement private investment. Display and describe all elements of the Plan in a way that is appealing to potential investors and that makes the process of project development, review and approval as efficient as possible Task 1. Develop Coding System FTB will determine the primary organizing system for regulatory policies in the Subarea Plan, prepare charts and diagrams for primary regulatory control for Corridor Segments and Districts. Task 2. Prepare Administrative Review Draft Subarea Plan The Administrative Plan (also know as "The Consultant Draft") is the first draft of the SpraguelAppleway Corridor Subarea Plan. This first draft contains all consultant recommendations for the contents of the Plan, and is prepared for the purpose of City Staff review, revision and addition. As such, this version of the plan is not meant for public review, since it will not yet have benefited from contributions from professional City Staff which are crucial to the development of a final Public Review Draft Plan. FTB will prepare the Administrative Draft, and will coordinate with ECO, SC and GJ with regard to their preparation of specialized sections within the plan document. FTB will prepare a table of contents, introductory section, a report on the primary plan framework developed in Phase 11 of the project, land use & development regulations and design guidelines. ECO will prepare an implementation plan section that expands on its various recommendations in Phase 11, which will include an assessment of how the City can coordinate its land use, transportation, and economic development planning to help create "vein -win" situations with private property owners and maximize the potential for public/private partnerships. ECO will also provide recommendations as to how public - private partnerships might be assembled to launch some of the development described in the Concept Plan. GJ will prepare the draft transportation element of the Plan. FTB will review that draft, discuss any modifications needed with G1. Glatting Jackson will coordinate the development of the draft transportation element of the sub area plan with FTB and the City of Spokane Valley. More specifically, the Subarea Plan will include the following sections: Introduction: Purpose; Authority; Plan Area; Plan Organization Rook /: Community Intent (includes pictures and illustrations) A. Starting Point: Existing Conditions at time of Plan Adoption (with portions by SC, ECO and GJ) B. Intended Outcomes including Plan Goals, The Envisioned Future Corridor and Implementation Strategy (the latter in collaboration with ECO) Rook /L• Development Regulations (includes regulatory diagrams and charts) A. Orientation / Applicability B. Site Development Standards C. Street and Open Space Standards & Guidelines D. Parking Standards & Guidelines (in consultation with GJ) E. Architectural Standards & Design Guidelines F. Signage Standards & Guidelines Book III: Planned City Actions A. Capital Improvement Programs B. Public Parking Facilities C. Mobility (provided by GJ in collaboration with City of Spokane Valley DPW and CH2MHill) D. Utilities (provided by the City DPW, if needed) Scope of Work, Sprague / Appleway Corridor ECONorthwest, May 06 Page 8 E. Implementation (portion having to do with the Development Approval Process to be provided by the City DCD) Appendices (as needed) Document production will be carried out by FTB and will include document design and formatting, cover design, annotation and formatting of full page graphic illustrations, as well as the production of electronic PDF files and one hard copy master for delivery to the city or for printing of the number of copies ordered by the City. Note: Printing expenses will be charged separately without any markup; this project budget does not include expenses for printing document copies). SC will assist in the development of the implementation plan to ensure that it includes the steps necessary to ensure staff, planning commission, City Council, community and property owner support of the draft Subarea Plan. Studio Cascade will attend meetings with stakeholders and interest groups as necessary to gain support for the plan and guide its implementation, as directed by ECO and FTB. Task 3. Plan Orientation Session with Planning Staff FTB will hold a session with the Core Team and additional Planning and Public Works staff of Spokane Valley to orient them to the contents and regulatory mechanisms of the Subarea Plan. BUDGET The budget for these services is summarized in the following table. Attachments provide detail, by firm, by person, by phase. Budget by Phase & Firm Labor Phase I Phase II Phase III TOTAL ECONorthwest $15,000 538,170 $10,670 $63,840 FTB $25,020 $144,554 $110,158 $279,732 Studio Cascade $19,450 $13,400 $2,600 $35,450 Glatting Jackson $9,980 $24,970 $15,000 $49,950 TOTAL $69,450 $221,094 $138,428 $428,972 PAYNLENT SCHEDULE The Consultant (ECO, as prime contractor) will prepare short monthly progress reports describing progress and percent completion by Phase and send it to the City's project manager by email. The City will review the progress reports and discuss any issues with ECO within 10 days, and make payments of the amount agreed up within 30 days, of the date of the email. Billings will be monthly, based on estimated percent of Phase completed. For example, if the Consultant estimates, and the City concurs as reasonable, that 70% of the work for Phase l is completed in May and June, then the invoice would be for 70% of $69,450. The Consultant may be no more than 90"/0 of a Phase's budget before all products and meetings for that Phase (per this scope of work and the attached schedule of deliverables) have been delivered to the City. In some cases the Consultant may be working on two Phases at the same time: progress reports and progress payments will reflect that Scope of Work, Sprague / Appleway Corridor ECONorthwest, May 06 Page 9 Optional Services The following services are not included in the Scope of Services, but are recommended additions should resources be available for them: PHASE I:1. - OPTIONAL SERVICES Addition to Task tl -.Joint Cih' Council/Planninb Commission Study Session Participation of Glatting Jackson in the Joint City Council /Planning Commission Study Session, to assist FTB and ECO with the presentation of recommended transportation planning and street design recommendations. PHASE 111— OPT-IONAL SERVICES Task 4. City Review of Administrative Draft Subarea Plan FTB will forward a camera -ready document, electronic file and any additional copies ordered (at additional printing cost) to the City for review. Once City Staff has reviewed the document, FTB will attend a meeting in Spokane Valley to discuss the Subarea Plan draft with the City Staff Core Team. After receipt of a single marked -up copy of the plan containing the City's edits FTB will combine direction received at the review session with hard copy edits to produce the Public Iteview Draft. Task S. Prepare Public Review Draft Subarea Plan document FTB will modify text, illustrations and cover design of the Subarea Plan as directed by City Staff. Pictures and captions will be incorporated into Books l and III. Electronic formatting and paste -up will be adjusted for printing ease. After coordinating with City Staff regarding last- minute issues. FTB will forward the draft to ECO for review and comment, make final edits and prepare the camera -ready document file to the City. Task 6. Planning Commission Hearing The ECO team will review and contribute to Plan Addendum received from City Staff. FTB will prepare and present materials for the Planning Commission I- fearing. They will work with City Staff to coordinate logistics as well. Task 7. City Council Hearing The ECO team will review Plan Addendum received from City Staff and answer questions if needed. FTB will prepare and present materials for the City Council Hearing. They will work with City Staff to coordinate logistics as well. Task 8. Prepare Final Version of The Sprague/Appleway Corridor Subarea Plan. The ECO team will coordinate with City Staff regarding remaining issues needing closure and finalize the plan. FTB will prepare and transmit the Master File (an electronic file in PDF format) and copies to the City. Task 9. Compilation and Production of Editable Master File Copy (in addition to Nlaster POF files already included in the base Scope of Services) Scope of Work, Sprague / Appleway Corridor . ECONorthwest, May 06 Page 10 Page 1 of 3 Approximate Schedule for Deliverables (Assumes start date of Mal S, 2006) Phase Task Deliverable Firm Approx Meetings Approx Week Meeting Due Week June 2006 Phase I Task I. Project No deliverables n/a n/a n/a Start up Phase I Task 2. Existing Assemble a report on the existing policy SC 30- 1u.n -06 I meeting 13- Jun -06 Conditions environment. Plus photographs and GIS data. with City Inventory and stair Basemap Phase 1 Draft memorandum addressing existing GJ 30- Jun-06 I 20- Jun -06 conditions for vehicular, transit, pedestrian, teleconf'er and bike circulation, data collection, and once with transportation issues and opportunities. FTB and Cit Phase 1 'f ask 3. Analysis Internal draft of parts of a technical ECO 30- Jun-06 of Existing memorandum evaluating markets and City Conditions financial capacity and options Phase 1 Memorandum on the assessment of apparent F"rB 30- 1un-06 vulnerability of sites along corridor. .July 2006 Phase Task I. Focus Conduct a half -clay series of focus groups FfB, 20- Jul-06 It Groups ECO, OR GJ, 02 -Aug- SC 06 Phase Task 2. Core Attend and present at a full-day work session FTB, 21- Jul-06 I1 Team Working ECO, Oil Sessions (same GJ, 03 -Aug- trip as focus SC 06 groups) Phase 1 Tack 2. Existing Final memorandum addressing existing G1 20- Jul -06 I formal 4- Jun -06 Conditions conditions for vehicular, transit, pedestrian, tcleconfer Inventory and and bike circulation, data collection, and cnccs with Basemap transportation issues and opportunities. FTB and Preparation the City August 2006 Phase "task 3. Corridor Drag technical memorandum ECO 31 -Aug- I Team 14- Jul -06 11 Centers & 06 work Segments session Phase Task 3. Corridor Set up and maintain the project website SC 15 -Aug- II Centers & 06 Segments ' Phase Task 3. Corridor Summary memorandum of costs and SC 31 -Aug- 11 Centers & strategics to implement three priority projects 06 Segments from preferred alternative September Phase Task 4. Present City with materials to be used for FTB 13 -Sep -06 11 Community Workshop #1 Workshop #1 200GB Intemal: Users: Smythe: Documents:DelivctablcsMay06.doc Page 2 of 3 Phase Task 4, Prescm at and facilitate workshop_ Frovide a FTB, 14- Scp -06 A review 07- Sep -06 11 Community wri[len record ol ' workshoptoCiry. ECO, session 14-Sr-p-06 . Workshop #1 SC: with City slaff day of wOrkstf0 • Phase Task 3_ Corridor Final technical memorandum EM 29- Sep -06 11 Centers & Segrnenls october 2006 Phase Task 6. Present City with rnttwrinls 10 be used for FTB 11- Oct -I}6 11 CO1ntrlunity Workshop >#2 Workshop #2 Phase Task 6_ Present at and facilitate workshop. Provide s FTB, 12- 0ct -06 A review 7 -Aug )6 11 Commurity written record ofworkshnpto UV. £C4_ sussion Workshop #2 $C with City stafl-day of worksho _ Phase Task 7_ Joint Present thv results oi- the com row ily FTB 12- Oct -06 ![ City Council & workshops &. discuss direction and pross Phrtining Commission $Cody Se, ;s ion Phase Task. 3 • Corridor Develop and diagram corridor -scale FTB 17- 0ct -06 [l Centers & ahr- mativcs, assemble photographs, and $eginents prcparc diagrams illustrating rccommendod plan area boundaries, prepare cross - sections of thu &velopmrn[ wn� dor Phase 'task 7_ Joint Transportation Framework and Specific FTB, 31- Oct -06 2 Sep -06 fl City Council & transportation design features GJ Weconfer pct -06 Planning enec . Coammissiott meetings Study Scssion Phase Task 8. Cure Tearn working sevgionlworkshop with FTB, 31- 0ct -06 11 l)cveloplRefinc City Staff C3 street Dcsign and Transportadon Plarukirrg Conct is No•er 2006 Phase Task 5. Centers: Teleconference with the City FTB, 8- Nov -06 It conceptual ECO Alternatives Phase Task 9. Present City with materials to be used for IFTS 27 -Nov- 11 Community Workshop #3 06 Workshop 93 OR 4- Dec -06 Phase Task 9. ]} resentat and facil Raw workshop. Provide a FTB, 29 -Nov- Areview 28-Noy- 11 Communily written record of workshop to City_ GJ 06 session 06 Workshop 03 OCR 05- with City OR Dec -06 day of OS- Dco-06 workshop. 20000 IanternaI- Users - Smythe- Documents :DclivcrablcsMay46•doe Page 3 of 3 December 2006 Phase Task 10. Written summaries of all prrsenlations and Sc 22- Dec -06 fl Complete Plan meetings Framework January 2007 Phase Task 10. Final concept level recommendations, FTB, 12- Jan -07 Working Dec -06 II Complete Plan diagrams, and illustrations GJ tcicconfcr Framework once with whole team February 2007 Phase Task 1. Develop No deliverables n/a n/a n/a n/a III coding system March 2007 Phase. Task 2. Prepare Prepare Outline and preliminary some report ECO, 30 -Mar- 11 Administrative sections FTB, 07 Review Draft GJ, SC April 2007 Phase Task 2. Prepare Draft of the Subarea Plan FTB, 30 -Apr -07 2 Feb-07 111 Administrative GJ, tcleconfcr Mar -07 Review Draft ECO, enees with Subarea Plan Sc City of Spokane Valle May 2007 Phase Task 3. Plan Session with Core Team and Planning and FTB 15-May- III Orientation Public Works staff 07 Session with Planning Staff' 20068 Internal:llsers: Smythe: Documents: Deli verahlesMay06.doc SPFLAGUEIAPPLEWAY CORRIDOR SUBAREA PLAN: OVERVIEW OF PLANNING PROCESS CIOfy Community A40fatlgns & C*4no Oppottl,l nil 4ow tot 66"11441 Chanqo Envisicinirg the Future OwWor Plan Corocupl Dmmlopffmrd PROD ECT STAMP �xa�nr Annrai.YO�.�nr [�I F*�k Start lsp P�RX51� #�i+j rmid rtcorlhdz &1cd Clppa"[km IL "SROAO BRUSH' CENTERS d& SEGMENTS F'UDLUK R VE" FUDMA A "f €Nt 1P1AGt ��aun1. full il"com CA p Py.r+rmo AAAuQY�;rrFhips+ IJeal TgmmWWKJJIp surywdY $Ig4cipn Xl�ffYN#,/+! Ik cor"dw iGgminundy fnl�i ll"/RfJ irl t�. PtEPRAC* MWIAi M CENTERS A DNIINISTRATW DRAFT PUBLIC RE1fIEWAFT flryMop VIMACK 101Pti1 LP.AN lmplemAiritInij arvii:4• t�. PtEPRAC* MWIAi M �gr�Yp� J4lhhshpol1h #►r Ctrxitln I`Mm ti4rc�l+q G�nimunil} k%Fwp YR I ourcil SI'udY Sn1-= cltyR"wwmr STREET MIG'N QE4�LC%p nEDWK C*iw FtmW Dmun - 9°Qcaulied A JIMM1l+wq 0, 3--udx Sesalu A DNIINISTRATW DRAFT PUBLIC RE1fIEWAFT 101Pti1 LP.AN lmplemAiritInij arvii:4• iMNIMiL PtEPRAC* MWIAi M C1M CwnmunRy lnimni cltyR"wwmr The Submas Plan FpulPlgrF Pki-i DilvlWloh J4itn atrpf me 059 �:h�Llua. Che,ra i AdFngnl�htpMo .� Suhmra'I�n � �gt:1lcar+� lk'nll � Hr� ,J. °� ti [krt0ncr.� s,. i ..s�, . �5:�� PUrin:rrJ SEAN ,r_fa i�i�•r P!,4nnuig 5ter Fyla. iv -.� a�nPr -ann —�=��- - Hat r Y.s: f 2 2 2006 SEIPCORPO AT(ON BY: - OREGON WORKERS' COMPENSATION 400 High St SE CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE Salem, OR 97312 -1000 Toll Free 1 -800 -285 -8525 MAIL TO: CERTIFICATE HOLDER: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 11707 EAST SPRAGUE AVE SUITE 106 SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 99206 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 11707 EAST SPRAGUE AVE SUITE 106 SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 99206 The policy of insurance listed below has been issued to the insured named below for the policy period indicated. The insurance afforded by the policy described herein is subject to all the terms, exclusions and conditions of such policy. POLICY NO. POLICY PERIOD ISSUE DATE 356035 04/01/2006 TO 04/01/2007 05/16/2006 INSURED: BROKER OF RECORD: ECONOMIC CONSULTANTS OREGON LTD ECO NORTHWEST 99 W 10TH STE 400 EUGENE, OR 97401 -3040 LIMITS OF LIABILITY: Bodily Injury by Accident $1,000,000 each accident Bodily Injury by Disease $1,000,000 each employee Bodily Injury by Disease $1,000,000 policy limit DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS /LOCATIONS /SPECIAL ITEMS: 7005 IMPORTANT: The coverage described above is in effect as of the issue date of this certificate. It is subject to change at any time in the future. This certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights to the certificate holder. This certificate does not amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies above. CANCELLATION: SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL MAIL 30 DAYS' WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE ABOVE NAMED CERTIFICATE HOLDER. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Spokane ,,;oOValley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhatt@spokanevalley.org May 24, 2006 This document contains confidential tax information and has been redacted pursuant to RCW 82.32.330. Terry Moore You may petition for a review of our findings pertaining to any ECONorthwest 99 west 10th Street, Suite 400 redacted or withheld documents pursuant to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 2.75.080; and obtain judicial review Eugene, OR 97401 pursuant to RCW 42.56.550. Re: Amendment to Professional Services Contract executed May 18, 2006 Dear Mr. Moore, The City of Spokane Valley would like to execute an addendum with ECONorthwest, to that agreement executed by the parties on May 18, 2006 concerning the Sprague /Appleway Corridor Subarea Plan. The City proposes amending the Contract by requesting both parties sign this letter. Upon execution, this letter will serve as the Amendment to Section 9 to the contract stated below: 9. Records. The City or State Auditor or any of their representatives shall have full access to and the right to examine by ppointment during normal business hours all of the Consultant's records with respect to all matters covered in this contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement this /r ay of M" 2006. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY: David Mercier, City Manager ATTEST: pristine Bainbridge, City Clerk Consultant: ECONorthwest Terry Moo e, Tax ID No. REDACTED APPROVED AS TO FORM: ro, ,, -� - Cary P(.JDriskell, eputy City Attorney .D �tTY Ur - - S okane p . Valle Y 1170 7 .Sprague Ave. A • Suite 106 • Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 921 -1000 • Fax (509) 921 -1008 • cityhall @spokanevalley.org June 16, 2006 Terry Moore FCO Northwest 99 West 10`x' Street, Suite 400 Eugene, OR 97401 RE: Amendment to Professional Services Contract Executed May 18, 2006 Dear Mr. Moore: Enclosed for your records, please find one fully executed letter, which serves as the Amendment to Section 9 of the Professional Services Contract executed May 18, 2006. Thank you for your assistance in expediting this amendment. Sincerely, u ris Bainbridge City Clerk /cb Enc. ACORDTM CERTIFICA'I. OF LIABILITY INSURA _ -•-:E Page 1 of 2 05/152006 PRODUCER 877- 945 -7378 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE Willie North America, Inc. HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 26 Century Blvd. ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS P. O. Box 305191 Naehvillo, T14 372305191 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURED FCONorthwest INSURERA:American States Insurance Company 19704 -004 99 W. 0th Ave. ite 400 Su 4 Su INSURERS: United States Liability Insurance Company 25895 -000 INSURERC! Eugene, OR 97401 -3001 INSURER D: DAMAGET RENTED PRE.11 F,�I .Urence] I Is 200, 000 INSURER E: S - PERSONAL d ADV INJURY S COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REOUIREMENT. TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERIAS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR D DD' P TYPE OF INSURANCE P POL16YNUMBER D POLICY EFFECTIVE P POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS A G GENERAL LIABILITY O OICG2387644 9 9/11/2005 9 9/11/2006 E EACH OCCURRERCE i is , 000, 000 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY D DAMAGET RENTED PRE.11 F,�I .Urence] I Is 200, 000 MED EXP JAny one enlan) S S - PERSONAL d ADV INJURY S -, 0 GENERAL AGGREGATE 5 5 2, 0 0 0, 0 0 0 GEHL AGGREGATE LLIIIT APPLIES PER: P PRODUC'T'S - COMPIOP AGG S S 2 0 0 0 () 0 POLICY PIt LOC A A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY O OICG2387644 9 9/11/2005 9 9/11/2006 C COMBENEDSCNGLELIAIR 5 5 11000,000 BODILY INJURY S S ALL O% -OWED AUTOS BODILY INJURY $ $ X HIRED AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE S S GARAGELIABLIM A AUTO ONLY -NY A S OTHER THAN EA ACC $ $ AUTO E S AUTO ONLY: AGG S EXCESSLIABILITY E EACH OCCURRENCE S S AGGREGATF, g g OCCUR CLAIMS MADE A 5 S DEDUCTIBLE S S RETENTION S S WORKERS COMPENSATION AND I I WCSTATU• OTH- E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ $ ANY PROPRIFTOWPARTNERlEXECUTIVE E OFFICER'MEMa -ER EXCLUDED? E E.L. DISEASE • EA EMPLOYEE 5 5 E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ $ B O OTHER S SP1007439A 4 4/l/2006 4 4 2007 Professional Liability $ $3,000,000 Per Claim $3,000,000 Per Aggregate 10.000 D er claim DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION SROCATIONMEHICLESIEXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEME.NTMPEC1AL PROWSIONS I- L,gryVCLLA 1 IUN Except le daVa for nennav nt SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO 00 SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER. ITS AGENTS OR City of Spokane Valley 11707 Bast Sprague Ave Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 M,vrcucatAVVIiUO) L;011:10ZYYZV z°p1:4UYU4a Cert:7275294 ©ACORD CORPORATION 1988 Page 2 of 2 IMPORTANT If Ine certificoe holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED. ttre policy(ies} musk be endorsed. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such 0ndorsement(s), If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, rwertain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder A lieu of such endorsement(s)- DISCLAIMER The Certificate of Insurance on the reverse side of this form does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s), authorized representative or producer, and the certificate holder, nor does it aff-irrnntively or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed thereon. Ak.;UK 0 YD3 ZU'UIOUb4 Cali:1529929 Tg1.41390413 Certo7275294