06-066.00 Spokane County, Spokane City: WRIAS Watershed(v 16) .
[space reserved for file number J:
6 0'744
Attachments:
A, Resource Obligations far Grant Matching
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT:
TOWARDS DEVELOPING A DETAILED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR
WRIAS 55 i~ 57
THE LITTLE AND MIDDLE SPOKANE WATERSHEDS
WHEREAS, Chapter 90.82 RCW concerning Watershed Planning,
provides a collaborative process for participating governmental entities,
non-governmental organizations, and other interested parties to have
input into the local watershed planning process and
WHEREAS, this Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) seeks to
further that statutory process with respect to watershed planning for The
Little and Middle Spokane Water Resources Inventory Areas (WRIAs) 57
8~ 57; and
WHEREAS, the process in ch. 90.82 RCW and this MOA is not
intended to formally determine or resolve any legal dispute about water
rights under state or federal law. Rather, the process provides an
alternative, voluntary process for cooperative planning and managing the
use of Washington's water resources; and
WHEREAS, effective ~vatershcd planning cannot take place without
full participation of government entities, non-governmental
organizations, and other interested parties vtirithin the WRIA; and
V1rHEREAS, The Little and Middle Spokane Watershed Management
Plan (ver. 6/ 16/2005) has been adopted in joint session on January 31,
2006 by the Pend Oreille County Board of Commissioners, Spokane
County Board of Commissioners, and the Stevens County L3oard of
Commissioners.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parries agree as follows:
1.0 Purpose: The purpose of this MOA is to take steps as possible and
appropriate under RCW 90.82.030 to involve local water resource users
and local interest groups to give input and direction into the watershed
planning process. The goal of this collaboration is to reach a collective
understanding on the development of a Detailed Implementation Plan
identified in RCW 90.82.043 and RCW 90.82.04$. REFERENCE: The
WRIA 55/57 Phase IV MOA, V16
Little and Middle Spokane Watershed Management Plan (ver.
06/ 16/2005).
This MOA is not an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement under ch. 39.34
12CW. Interlocal Cooperation Agreements pursuant to ch. 39.34 RCW
are limited. to Public Agencies to accomplish governmental purposes and
such Interlocal Cooperation Agreements may result from the
collaborative process supported in this MOA however.
2.0 Definitions:
"Consensus" means unanimous agreement.
"Detailed Implementation Plan" or "DIP" has the same meaning os used
in RCW 90.82.043 and RCW 90.$2.048, as the document with the
strategies implementing the Plan. [For references to "Flan," see .the Little
and Middle Spokane Watershed Management Plan below.]
"Implementing Party" is any entity, including but not limited to an Indian
Tribe, agreeing to participate and having legal authority to contract to
implement elements in the DIP. An Implementing Party may be either an
Implementing Government or an Implementing Non-Gvvernmental
.Member (1\tGM): These groups are further descr-ibed:
"Implementing Governments" are those governmental entities,
including Indian Tribes, having a role in Plan implementation as
described in the DIP, with legislative and regulatory authority,
whose jurisdiction lies wholly or partly within the boundary of
WRIAS 55 £ic S7, and who are signatories to this MOA. For the
purposes of implementing the Plan, Ecology represents only itself.
This shall not prevent other State Agencies from joining this MOA
by written agreement. ~ .
Implementing NGMs are non-governmental persons or entities
entering into contractual relationships to implement elements as
identified in the Plan. An implementing NGM need not be a
Watershed Implementation Team member.
"Implementation Matrix is a document showing all recommended
elements .of.an approved WRIA Plan as the final step in plan development
and recommendations, as further explained in Section 6.3.
~Tmplementing rules" has the definition in RCW 90.82.020 (2), which arc
the rules needed to give force and. effect to parts of the Plan that create
WkIA 55lS7 Phase N MQA, V16 2
rights or bands any party, including a state agency, or that establish
water management policy.
"Initiating Governments" are those local gavernments initiating the
Watershed planning process as identified in RCW 90.82.060(2) for the
area designated by the Washington State Department of 1/cology as
WRIAS SS & 57, also known as The Little and Middle Spokane
Watersheds. They continue as Implementing Governments and
signatories to this MUA, to wit: Pend Oreille County, Stevens County,
Spokane County, Vera Water ~ Power, Whitworth Water District ~2 and,
the City of Spokane.
"Lead agency" is that entity that shall convene the Watershed
Implementation Team {WIT) and administer the Phase Four Watershed
Planning Grant Funds [Ref. RCW 90.82.040(2)J. The Lead agency
contracts for services, using funds available under ch. 90.82 RCW or
contributed through other sources. The Lead agency has no power to
bind another Government ~cRthout its expressed written consent, through
its governing body. The Lead agency shall likewise be responsible for
application and management of grant funds for purpose of this MOA.
Designation of a Lead agency does not limit the option of another
Government to apply for and manage grant funds for plan
implementation. [Cross reference, RCW 90.82.060 (6)J
"Minimum instream flow" has the definition of RCW 90.82.020 {3).
"Planning Unit" was a committee formed pursuant to Chapter 90.82
RCW by the Initiating Governments to initiate the ch. 90.82 process,
which resulted in the adopted The Little and Middle Spokane Watershed
Management Plan (the Plan). For the purpose of developing the Detailed
Implementation Plan, to implement The Little and Middle Spokane
Watershed Management Plan (ver. 06/.16/2005), the Planning Unit will
tae replaced 1,y the Watershed Implementation Team (WIT) as further
described below.
"The Little and Middle Spokane Watershed Management Plan (ver.
06/ 16/2005)", sometimes also referenced as the "Plan" is defined in RCW
90.82.020 (6) with respect to WRIAS 55 & 57. It includes any rules
adopted in conjunction with the product of the Planning Unit.
"Watershed Implementation TeamA (WIT) is the successor of the Planning
Unit, formed for the purpose of implementing The Little and Middle
Spokane Watershed Management Plan (ver. 06j 16/2005). WIT
membership is listed in Appendix A. The list may be amended by its
members as provided in Section 5.
1VRIA 55/57 Phase IV tv10A, V16 3
~-~
"WF:1A" is a water resource inventory area, as provided for under RCW
90.82.020 {4). This MOA concerns WRIAs SS & 57.
3.0 Governments Scope: Watershed Planning far WRIAs 55 ~, 57
includes an opportunity to receive state grant funding, when local match
funding can be met, for Phase hour, Detailed Implementation Plan (DIP)
development, as provided for in Chapter 90.82 RCW and RCW 90.82.040.
3.1 The main focus of Phase hour will be planning: 1) who will
implement that Plan, 2} how the Plan will be implemented, and
3) the commitment of resources by those implementing entities.
3.2 Approval of the completed DIP shall be by the same formalities
as this MOA; by written instrument duly executed in like
manner as this MOA.
4.0 Lead Ageacp: Spokane County is the Lead agency under this MOA.
The Lead agency shall administer the grant fiends and contract for
services to support development of the detailed implementation plan.
Project budgets and utilization oC consultants shall be agreed upon by
the WIT per the process described in section 6.0 of this agreement.
5.0 Watershed Implementation Team (WIT): The WIT is composed of
the parties signing this MOA and those members of the WR[As 55 &
57 Flanning Unit, when the Planning Unit approved The Little and
Middle Spokane Watershed Management Plan during the Planning
Unit meeting on June 16, 2005, all as listed in Appendix A. Future
membership may be amended in accordance with this MOA.
5.1 Parties in Exhibit A have appointed a representative or
representatives to the WIT. New non-governmental
representation in the WIT may be developed as outlined in
Section 5.3. Each member of the WIT is responsible to appoint
one primary representative and as many alternates as desired.
Alternates may serve in lieu of the primary contact.
5.2The appointed Representatives of Implementing Governments
shall be voting members of the WIT. With respect to NGMs,
after a person desiring to participate in the WIT has attended
three consecutive regular WIT monthly meetings, the WIT may
accept such person as a voting member by a vote of the WIT
members pursuant to sec. 6 of this MOA. In voting to accept a
WtT candidate, the WIT shall be guided by considerations of
assuring that water resource user interests and directly
involved local-level interest groups have a fair and equitable
opportunity to give input and direction to the process. [Cross
reference, RCW 90.82.030 (1)J
R'RIA 55/57 Phase R' MQA, V 16 4
. ,
5.2.1 An existing NGM representative may be removed from
voting status if such person misses three consecutive regular
~VIT monthly meetings. A motion to rernove is introduced at a
regular WIT meeting. Thereafter, the Lead agency and/or a
designee shall contact the party in question, no less than 1.0
business days before the next regular meeting. The majority of
the WIT members in attendance at the next regular meeting
may then terminate voting membership by majority vote. A
removed NGM representative may join again as provided in 5.2.
5.2.2 Where a voting Government representative on the WIT
misses three ConSCCUt1Ve regular monthly meetings, written
notice may be given to said party of intent to remove voting
status at least 10 business days before a regular monthly
meeting where the question is to be considered. At such
meeting, the removal must be approved by a majority of the
WIT members in attendance and the appointing Government
shall then be given written notice of such action. The removal
does not become effective unless the appointing Government
fails to appoint or reappoint a representative within sixty (60}
days of being notified. The appointing Government can appoint
a ne~v representative or reappoint a removed representative
with fully restored voting rights at any time thereafter.
5.2.3 Government withdrawal: see section $.3.
5.3 The WIT may adopt rules for operation, decision-making, and
membership to supplement those presented in this MOA but nat in
conflict with the MOA.
6.0 Frocess:
6.1 In so far as possible, all decisions of a quorum of the WIT will
be by consensus, but the Implementing Governments must
reach Consensus, whether or not in attendance at a meeting. In
addition, no decision may bind any Implementing Government
to an obligation without written approval of its governing body,
with the exception of state and federal agencies, whose
representatives can agree to obliga.tians. h'or the purposes of
this MOA, "Obligation" is defined in sec. 6.3.4.
6.2 Where Consensus has been reached among Implementing
Government representatives, whether or not in attendance, but
a consensus cannot be reached among other WIT members after
a reasonable amount of time, approval for purposes of
\YlilA 55!57 Phase iV ~40A, V 16 5
- - ~'~
J.
participation of such non-government members shall be by
majority vote arnang those non-government members in
attendance at a meeting and shall decide the issue for such
members. A `reasonable amount of time' as used in this
paragraph is determined by majority vote of all those WIT
members in attendance at the meeting, except that a reasonable
amount of time shall not be less than deferring a vote until the
next regular meeting following the meeting with the call to vote.
6.3 Implementation Matrix. The Plan included an Implementation
Matrix which sets forth Issues and Recommendations. The
Detailed Implementation Plan (DIP) shall identify items creating
an obligation on the part of any of the Implementing Entities
(Governments and NGOs), including their status as lead or
cooperating (supporting), as well as level of effort (including cost
as available ar reasonable estimate).
6.3.1 For the purposes of this MOA, the parties further state
their intent that no Implementing Rule, as defined in
RCW 90.82.020, shall bind an Implementing
Government without its' written consent, approved in
the manner described above.
6.3.2 An Implementing Government which accepts and
completes a_n obligation as specified in the D1P shall be
regarded as having fulfilled it's responsibilities for
these issues, recommendations, and/or strategies
under the Watershed Management Plan or other
related regulatory requirements during the finite terms
specified under the DIP. _
6.3.3 NGMs may consent to element(s) of the actions that
impose an obligation on such NCIMs by written
approval of their governing bodies, with the exception
of state and federal agencies, whose representatives
can agree to obligations. This shall not preclude any
requirement for a contractual agreement for NGM
Implementers to utilize funding from an implementing
Government.
6.3.4 GObligation" means any required action that imposes
fiscal impact, a re-deployment of resources or a.
change of existing policy.
6.4 All technical decisions c~~ill be based on best available science.
For purposes of Watershed Planning in WRIAS 55 & 57, the WIT
will use the criteria in WAC 365-195-905. Ir or such elements
that include implementation by Indian Tribal agencies, best
available science criteria may be modiried to include best
WRLA 55/57 Phase 1 V MOA, V 16 ~
~\
. r
.~I `_ .
available science de"terminations by tribal natural resource
agencies or departments.
6.5 Technical advisory- group(s) and/or v~~ork group(s) may be
established by the WIT to provide reports and recommendations
on specific issues.
7.0 Funding:
7.1 13y signing this Agreement, the Implementing Governments
intend to bind themselves to the Grant Authority to provide
resources as shown in Attachment A to meet the "matching"
portion of the grant for Phase Four. Such execution also
satisfies the requirements of written consent of said signatory
under this MOA as regards Attachment A.
7.2 Gram funds, match and staff or other contributed resources
may be used for any purpose approved by the Grant Authority
and the contributing entities, including the preparation of
technical reports for review by the WIT and/or technical
committees and/or focus groups as approved by the VVIT. The
initial budget for Phase Four will also be reviewed and approved
by the WIT.
?.3 Participation in the WIT and/or technical committees and/or
focus groups by all participants, including officials and' staff,
shall be contributed time not eligible for reimbursement from
grant funding unless expressly approved by Implementing
Governments, consistent «rith the provisions of Chapter 90.82
RCW.
?.4 The Implementing Governments recognize the financial burden
watershed planning places on smaller units of government and
support their effort to secure outside sources of funding to
ensure effective participation by these entities.
8.0 Duration:
8.1 This MOA becomes effective on the date as provided in section
11 and terminates 18 months after such date.
8.1.1 In accordance with RCW 90.82.040(2)(e), a Detailed
Implementation Plan shall be approved by the WIT ~~ithin
one year from the date on which Phase Four funds are
accepted and utilized by the Lead Agency. Said Detailed
lmplcmentation Plan shall then require approval by the
governing body of each signatory agency of this agreement;
~VRIA 55157 Phase IV vfOA, V 16 7
.
`:
with the exception of state and federal agencies, whose
representatives can agree to obligations.
8.1.2 In the event that the WIT has developed and approved a
Detailed Implementation Clan, the WIT may continue to
operate pending ratification by governing bodies as per 8.1.1,
above.
8.2 Not withstanding 8.1, by written agreement signed by all
parties to this MOA, this MOA may be extended an additional
period as agreed, not to exceed two (2) years.
8.3 Any WIT Member may withdraw from this MOA and the
planning process at any time. If any member withdraws, that
member shall not be deemed a party to any plan elements or
agreement produced. Withdrawal must be by written notice to
the Lead Agency, effective thirty (~O) days after receipt of notice
by the Lead Agency. Upon receipt of notice, the Lead Agency
shall communicate the same in writing to all signatories within
ten (I 0) days. A withdrawing party shall not be entitled to any
refund or withdrawal of funds or resources obligated under this
MOU absent consent of the affected signatories. Unobligated
funds or resources shall be released to the c~~ithdrawing party.
9.0 Modiifiication: This MOA may be modified or amended only by a
subsequent written document, signed by all participating parties.
10.0 Preservation of Rights:
10.1 The parties acknowledge that Chapter 90.82 RCW provides that the
planning process shall not result in provisions which conflict with
federally reserved tribal rights. They agree that tribal participation in
this process shall not constitute an admission or agreement by the
participating tribe that any estimate of federally reserved tribal rights are
binding on it, unless the affected tribe expressly so agrees in writing at
the conclusion of the process, and such tribal agreement is approved in
writing by the appropriate agency of the United States Government (e.g.
Bureau of Indian Affairs).
10. 2 Reports and data from original studies conducted by or on behalf
of the WIT are public records pursuant to 40.14.010 RCW (preservation
statute.
11.0 Effective Date: 'Chis MOA shall become effective and commence
upon execution by all parties as listed hereinafter. In the event the Lead
Agency determines, after a reasonable effort, that it is not possible to
WRIA 55!57 Phase I V MOA, V 16 S
,' ~
,\ J ;
obtain the signatures of all parties listed, it shall communicate the same
to the remaining parties in writing. Any group of remaining parties may
then agree to continue. After the Load Agency obtains the v~rritten
consent of such graup, which may be gi~~e by the chief executive of a
participant, it gives written notice to all the rcma.ining participants. The
date of such notice is the commencement date. The deadline for giving
this notice is October 1, 2006 unless extended by consent of the
participants.
~VRIA 55157 Phase IV MOA, V 16 9
• ~/,.
jfj,! `
/~
~f
~,
i
.`
IN WITNIaSS WHEREOF, eve the undersig~ied have executed this MOA as
of the date as indicated.
PEND O I1. E COUNTY: Q
By: Date: ~ S ~ ~ ~a006- /`~~
Kenneth Oliver, Chair
SPOKANE COUNTY:
By:
Todd Mielke, Chair
STEVENS COUNTY:
Date:
By: Date:
Merrill J. Ott, Chair
CITY OF SPOKANE:
By:
Dennis Hession, Mayor
WHITWORTH WATER DISTRICT #2:
Date:
By' Date:
Chris Johnson, President
VERA WATER & POWER:
By:
David Peterson, Chair
SPOKANE AQUIFER JOINT E;OARD:
Date:
By: Date:
Ty Wick, President
WRIA SSf57 Phase R' b40A. V 16
10
~ ~ ~ -\~ /
\•__ ~ J
IN WITNESS WHI/'REOF,.we the undersigned have executed this MOA as
of the date as indicated.
PEND OREILLE COUNTY:
By: Date:
Kenneth Oliver, Chair
SPOKANE COUNTY:
I
~~c
Date:
odd Mielke, Chair
STEVENS COUNTY:
By: Date: ~ .
Merrill J. Ott, Chair
CITY Of SPOKANE:
~y: Hate:
Dennis Hession, Mayor
WI-iITWOR'I'H WATER DISTRICT #2:
>~y: Date::
Chris Johnson, President
VERA WATER & FOWER:
By: Date:
David Peterson, Chair
SPOKANE AQUIFER JOINT BOARD:
sy:
T~ Wick, President
Date:
WRIA X5/57 Ph~-se 1 V ~tOA, V 16 10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, eve the undersigned have executed this MOA as
of the date as indicated.
PEND OREILLE COUNTY:
By: Date:
Kenneth Oliver, Chair
SPOKANE COUNTY:
By:
Date:
Todd Mielkc, Chair
ST!/VENS C/O'UNTY:~ ~~~}-
By: ~/ aJ..~1~%',~ ~` L~~~ Date: ~~di ~~
Y
Me J. Ott, Chair
CITY OF SPOKANE:
By: Date:
Dennis Hessian, Mayor
i
WHITWORTH WATER DISTRICT #2:
By:
Chris Johnson, President
Date:
VERA WA"I'ER & POWER:
By: Date:
David Peterson, Chair
SPOKANE AQUIFER JOINT BOARD:
By: Date:
Ty Wick, President
WRLA SS157 Phase IV MOA, V16 10
- --,
~.~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we the tindersi~ned have executed this MOA as
of the date as uidicated.
PEND OREILLE COUNTY:
By; Date:
Kenneth Oliver, Chair
SPOKANE COUNTY:
By:
Todd Mielke, Chair
STEVENS COUNTY:
By: -
Date:
Date:
Merrill J. Ott, Chair - .
CITY OF SPOKANE:
gy; _ , - Date: ~ - ? _~
nnis Hession, Mayor
WHITWORTH WATER DISTRICT #Z:
By; Date:
Chl;-is Johnson, President
VEI2.A WATER & POWER:
t3y; Date:
David Peterson, Chair
SPOKANE AQUIFER JOINT BOARD:
By:
T}~ Wick, President
Date:
WRIA 55157 Phase I~' `4(~A, V16 10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we the undersigned have executed this MOA as
of the date as indicated.
FEND OREILLE COUNTY:
By: Date:
Kenneth Oliver, Chair
SPOKANE COUNTY:
By: Date:
Todd Mielke, Chair
STEVENS COUNTY:
By: Date:
Merrill J. Ott, Chair
CITY OF SPOKANE: -
By: - Date:
Dennis Hession, Mayor -
WHITUVORTH AT ~ ST 2:
r~
~~ ~ Date: ~ ~ ~
By~ ~ ~' -
' C:bris Joh son Chai r
VERA WATER $a POWER:
By: - Date:
David Peterson, Chair
SPOKANE AQUIFER JOINT BOARD:
By:
Ty Wick, President
Date:
~G
WRIA SS/57 Phase 1V MOA, V 16 10
• i~ .
-- ~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we the undersigned have executed this MOA as
of the date as indicated.
PENN OREILLE COUNTY:
By: Date:
Kenneth Oliver, Chair
SPOKANE COUNTY:
By: Date:
Todd Mielke, Chair
STEVENS COUNTY:
By: Date:
Merrill J. Ott, Chair
CITY OF SPOKANE:
By: ~ Date:
Dennis Hession, Mayor
WHITWORTH WATER DISTRICT #2:
By: Date:
Chris Johnson, President
VERA WATER & PO E
By: ` Date: 1D~~ .
David Peterson, Chair
SPOKANE AQUIFER JOINT BOARD:
By:
Ty Wick, President
Date:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF ECOLOGY:
~YRiA 55157 Phase IV MOA, V 16 9
/",
i I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we the undersigned have executed this MOA as
of the date as indicated.
PEND OREIL,LE COUNTY:
gy: Date:
Kenneth Oliver, Chair
SPOKANE COUNTY:
By; Date:
Todd Mielke, Chair
STEVEI~IS COUNTY:
By:
Merrill J. Ott, Chair
CITY OF SPOKANE:
By:
Dennis Hession, Mayor
Date:
Date:
WHITWORTH WATER DISTRICT #2:
gy: ~ Date:
Chris Johnson, President
VERA WATER & POWER:
By: Date:
David Peterson, Chair
SPOKANE AQ IFER OI BOARD:
' By: Date: ~ '~ OO~o
Ty Wi ,.President
WR1A SSJ57 phase N MOA, V 16 10
~f ~ • ~~
~ ••~
AkII DNS ~'I'. ~` ECOIa~Y: ~ . • .
,.
' ~ 5
r
- grant Pfeifer, Fie n Director ~ ~ ~ ~ .
~. ~ 1'I'~ ~~' ~~i{ANIi~ AL~,EY: ~ . •
_ ~~ - --- --- Date: ~ ~ •
Diana 1~Vilhite, Mayor - ~ .
IT` DF LIBEF~TY LAKE: ~ - .
- By; Date: ~ ... •
Steve Peterson, Mayor ~ ~ " -
1TY ~~1~ D~1~ Pl~1~I~: ~ •
By: ~ Date; ~ . - -
1~obert V~hzsman, Mayor . ~~
'T'OWN DF ILL~D~D: . .
• ~ Fiy: ~ Date: ~ •
D~nie1~N. Morn, NTayor ~ ~ ~ .
..
i~-
PDANE RUNTY OEIAT`IO BIT`RI~T: ~ .
rcrald cheelc, chair
~1'RIh SSl57 Phase N ~+i~A, V ~ l t -
~ ~ \ '
WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF ECOLOGY:
Fiy: Date:
Grant Pfeifer, Regional Director
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY:
B Date: 8~ ~ ~ O~D
Y~
Diana Wilhite, Mayor
CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE:
By: Date:
Steve Peterson, Mayor
CITY OF DEER PA12K:
By: Date:
Robert Whisman, Mayor
TOWN OF MILLWOOD:
By: Date:
Daniel N. Mvrk, Mayor
SPOKANE COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT:
By: Date:
Gerald Scheele, Chair
WRIA SS/57 Phase ! V MQA, V 1 C 11
WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF ECOLOGY:
gy; Date:
Grant Pfeifer, Regional Director
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY:
B}''
Diana Wilhite, Mayor
CI
By:
Date:
TYOFLI ,
Date: !~ ~~ 7 D ~
Steve Pet rson, Mayor
CITY OF DEER PARK:
By:
Robert Whisman, Mayor
TOWN OF MILLWOOD:
By:
Daniel N. Mork, Mayor
Date:
Date:
SPOKANE COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT:
gy: Date:
Gerald Scheele, Chair
WRIA SS/S7 Phase 1V MOA, Vlb
WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF ECOLOGY:
t 1 By: Date:
~~ Grant Pfeifer, Regional Director
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY:
By: Date:
Diana Wilhite, Mayor
CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE:
By: Date:
Steve Peterson, Mayor
CITY OF DEER PARK: 1 /
By: ~ . Date: ~` •2 ~ ` ~6
~~
Robert Whisman, Mayor .
TOWN OF MILLWOOD:
By:
Daniel N. Mork, Mayor
Date:
SPOKANE COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT:
By: Date:
Gerald Scheele, Chair
~ ~~
,~ J;
~YRTA 55!57 Phase TV MOA, V 1 h
{ ~' +~~
~•
rant Pfeifer, Ie~ior~al Director
CITY OIL P~ANIf Ai,F~EY:
Sv:
Dix. Wilhite, Mayor
CITY ~F LIB~R'i'Y L.liE:
ley:
Steve P~k~1`SOnt I:+~~y~r
1T ~F ~~~ PARi~:
B:
F2ol~ert ~his~an, Mayor
I~~t~:
hate:
Date:
Date:
Fem.
~~ .:
TOWN ~F MILLVV~~I]:
B3~: -~ ~ ~~. - -- Date: ~ ~
' Daniel N, Mork, Mayor
POKAI~IIa~ OU'I`Y DId~I~V1~'I`I~I~i ~}IT121'7':
>~}+: Date:
erg Scheele, heir
~~RIA 55!37 Phase IV MOB X16 10
WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF ECOLOGY:
By: Date:
Grant Pfeifer, Regional Director
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY:
By:
Diana Wilhite, Mayor
Date:
CITY OF LIBERTY LAKE:
Fay: Date:
Steve Peterson, Mayor
CITY OF' DEER PARK:
By:
Robert Whisman, Mayor
TO~~~1V QF MILL~~VOOD:
By:
Daniel N. Mc)rk, Mayor
Date:
Date:
SPO COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT: /_
$y: ~, Date: ~/ a ]~O `~
Gerald Seheele, Chau-
WIt1A 55/57 I'hlse IV MOA, V16
• ~.
~V~a
]i ~' 1 D~{~Ya~
Approved as to fo ` ,r ~ ~,: '~ ~
1;,~ "~ Ci ~O'
.
Approved as to form:
Barbara Burns,
Assistant City Attorney
City of S okane Ron Arkills,
Deput}~ Prosecuting Attorney
S okane CoLm
Attest: ~ Attest:
Terri Pfister
City Clerk
Ci of S okane Daniela Erickson
Clerk of the Board
S okane Count
Approved as to form: Approved as ko form:
Attest: Attest:
Approved as to form: Approved as to form:
Attest: Attest:
WKIA 55!57 Phase IV MUA, V16 12
Approved as to farm: A r ed as fo
Robert G. Beaumier, Jr.,
Assistant City Attorney
Ci of S okanc Ron Arkills,
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
S okanc Count
'
Attest: t t: " '
~~
',Y pa,
Terri Pfister
City Clerk
Cit of S okanc Daniels Erickson
Clerk of the Board
S okanc County o~.?4?a~~
~jWWOO a~
Approved as to form: Approved as to form:
Attest: Attest:
Approved as to form: Approved as to form: .
Attest: Attest:
0
n
~~
WRIA 55/57 Phase (V MOA, V 1 b 12
. ~
Attachment A
Implementiing Governments agree to provide no less than the following
resources for the duration of this MOA to meet the requirement that the
Little -and Middle Spokane (WRIAS 55 8s 57) ~VVIT provide the 10% match
required for Phase Four Grant funding. (cross reference RCW 90.82.044 &
90.82.040 (2)(e))
Implementing Couernment I Resource description.
ours * $ rate Resource value ($J
Ci of S okane s 60 * $ 49 ~ 2940.00
c $0 0
Ci of S okane Valley ~ s 60 * $42 2520.00
(c $0 0
S okane Coun s 60 * $44 ~ 2640.00
s 60 * $50 3000.00
c $0 0'
Pend Qreille Caun s 60 '" $31 -1860.00
c $0 0
~~Vhitc~vorth Water District s 60 ~` $66 3960.00
s ~i0 * $2U 1200.00
c $0 ~ U
S akane A ttifer Joint Board s 60 * $67 - 4020.00
c $0 0
Vera Water &, Power s 36 * $66 2376.00
c $0 0
Cit ~ of Liber ~ Lake s $0 0
(c) $0 0
Ci of Deer Park s $0 0
c $0 0
Town of IVlill~vood s $0 0
c $0 0
Spokane County Conservation
District (s) $0 0
' c $0 0
Wash. De t. of Ecolo *~" " "
Resource description codes:
(s) - sla.ff participation: specify hours per annum and rate of compensation
(c) -direct funding: cash paid to the Lcad Agency for WRIA W1T actin=ities
12esvurce Rates are based on base salary, benefits, and a 25% mark up for
overhead.
* * State funding not eligible far grant m~.tching
~VRIA SSr'S7 Phase IV MOA, V16 13