07-083.00 CH2M Hill: Valley Corridor Project Environmental Studies~~ . :~ - .
Tr~,nsporta#io~ Improvement f~aard ~-
~orlultarlt ~pplrn~ntal grlwmnt
Agei,Cy City Of pOk2,rle Valley Protect Num6~r #05-~0
ProJeCl N2~me pity Of p~ka~e Valley orrid~r Project - Er~vir~r~mental tudi~s
Consulting Firm HNI .HILL, InC_
up}}lem~nt ~nase En~+ironmental tudi~5
The Local Agency of pity of Spokane Valley desires to supplement the. agreerrlent entered into +n++th
N2M WILL, Inc_ and executed on Jude 29, 2~0~. -
All provisions ire the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by-this supplemen#.
~`he crlanges to the agreement are descried as follows; -
ectiarl II, SCOPE OF ORI{, is hereby amended to include
code of Work additions ar',d deleti~r~s as described in attached HM HILL letter to pity of
Spokane Valley,-dated April ~1~, OQ7.
eotion IV, TIME FOR BEtaINNIN Alf] OOAIIPLETIOhi, is amended to change the Completion Cate
SUPPLEMENTl~L ~~MFLETIOh! SATE October ~1, 0Q7
ectian V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as f~IlpwS as set forth in Exhibit A
MAIPw+IUM AMOUNT ~I~Y~4BLE 1.849.~f]
EWIBlT A
Original Agreement 9upplelment Total
Qirect salary Cast $4,899.14 1 ~,7f~.1 ~fi,175.6
overhead
{including Payroll Adtriti~s~ $76,81.16 1 x;.81 93,fi86.97
Qirect Pion-salary Costs 6;49.57 ~15,d51 _~) $51,041.1
Fixed Fee $14,670.14 X3,819.49 $17,983.47
ion#ir10ency ,9fi~.5~ Q.OO 2F9fi2.59
Total $06,375.59 15,47d_QO 2~1.84~,§f]
If you concur with this supplement and agree to-the changes as stated above, please sign and date in the
appropriate spaces below.
AgenCY ~~ aalure dale .
~~
CansullanE ~ignatura d~t9
~~
~
~ ~r
TISCONSULTpNTSUPPLElAcNTAL AGREEEMENT f~b 4,a0L
~~-~~
~ •
~..® CHZMHILL
~`.
April ] 3, 2007
332655.A1.
Steve Worley
Senior Engineer for C1P
City of Spokane Valley
11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 7.06
City of Spokane Valley, WA 99206
CN2M HILL
9 Saulh Washington
Suite 409
Spokano,lwA 99201.3709
Tel 509.623.1664 x245
Fax 509.252.1507
Subject: Scope of Work/Budget Supplemental Agreement No. 4 for Valley Corridor
Environmental Study Project
17car Steve:
This letter documents ou.r April 1.1_, 2007, meeting regarding justification far an amendment
to the scope of v<~ork and budget for the Valley Corridor Environmental Study Project.
CH2M HILL performed the following additional services, which were requested by City
and not inchtded i.n our original scope of work or subsequent supplemental agreements.
Task 1: Project Management
Coordination Meetings Related to Interdisciplinary Team Meetings. Task ]..2 of our original scope of
work provides for CT-12M HILL staff to attend four Interdisciplinary Team (TDT) meetings.
't`hree of the four scheduled TDT meetings have already occurred Quly 14, 2005, September
8, 2005, and L7ccember 16, 2005). It is our understanding that tllc fourth IDT meeting will
not be necessary and is therefore deleted from CH2iVI HILL's scope of work.
In support of the TDT meetings, CH2M F-IILL staff attended seven additional coordination
meetings with City staff. The project manager and transportation planner attended the
additional meetings and additional effort was needed for preparation, follow-on, and
administrative activities related to these meetings.
Advisory Team Meetings. Task 1.2 of our original scope of ~~ork also states that Advisory Team
(AT) members will be invited to attend all ID'f meetings. The scope of work and budget did
not assume separate AT meetings. I-Towever, at the request of the City and AT members,
five AT meetings were held separately from the IDT meetings. These meetings occurred on
the following dates:
• October 12, 2005
• December 21, 2005
• •
Steve Worley
1}age
Aprii 73, ~[]U7
3'~2b5~.A-1
• January ~4, 2006
• February ~4, ~UUb
a}~ 19, ~f~0~
There x~ere additional unplanned revisions based on input received at these 1lT meetings, as
~vel1 as t>tie effort to prepare For and attend these it~eekin~s- Prior fio tl~e AT nteekings klte
Cit}~ anCl ~!-li2 WILL tivould agree on ~n appr~a~h and strate~,~ For traffic mode~in and
analysis. Based on that approach and strategy, ~~ork would be performed and ~c~ntlusions
would be reached. l~owevcr, input front the additional AT mcctiri~s resulted in redouig ar
n~adif}Ping the ntiadcling, analysis, and conclusions, which were subsequently suntimarizeci
in tecFuiical men~arandums,
Jrt addition, pro]~Ct team (i->v2 ~iiLL aria ~it}~ staft~ meetings +~ere usually >~eld before the
AT meetings tv plan for meeting presentations. Because of the concerns of the Spokane
Regional Transportation council (F{TC} and other 'f members, additional effort was
needed to explain our struteg}~ and approach, presentation ntiaterials ~=ere developed to
explain ou r concl unions at the AT rne~tin~s-
Project Administration. The ori~ nal scope of ,,vork's schedule kvas for t>tie project to be
completed u7 5 months (by the end of December ~Of}5]. The schedule was cxtertded tlu-augh
arid-August as a result of the need for additional AT meetings, coordination with the STC,
and to address the various issues related ko alternative selection, The extended project
schedule, in turn, resulted in additional administrative costs,
Sx~tr~~tr~ri~ of Task ~ F'rojectll~at~age»xet~t Artddt~n~trrl Cnst~s:
$ 5,Q00 interdi~~iplinary Team l~Ileetin~ ~oordinativn
$1,745. Advis(ary Term Meeting
~ $.588 ProJeet r~drtxi3listration
~,33~ Total
bask ~: deficiencies and Alternatives
fur initial scope of c}rk assumed tltiat exi8tin~ data and ~nformat;on ~vUUld be used to
develop deficiencies and assess alternatives. AT input, particularly that From S1~T staff,
resulted in re~Farking the ~t~i~dolin and analyses, a~~d the need to sumtt~ari~e these c>tianges
ivn upci~ted techn.i~al rnernorandums. Ln aclditior~, a "alley corridor Traffic Systcnti
anagementf'FraEfic Den~a~td tana~ement [T$,lh f TD] Alternative Development"
technical memorandum was prepared to address S~7't='s request for presenting a c€etai l~cl,
well-tho+~gltt-out T$M f TpM alkernati+~e as one of t>tie altea-naHves ko be included in the short
list. Also, a.l ternatives ~vere developed and recanui~cnded b}+ H~ H1LL a3id an additional
alternative ~=as included lased on pity council recor~rnendations. Irxitiall~, the scope of.
-r 1
. .
• •
Steve Worley
Page 3
Apri113, 2007
332655.A1
work assumed analysis for up to 20 intersections per alternative. In the end over 29
intersections v,~crc analyzed for most alternatives including re~~ising operations analysis
resulting from staff recommendations on cha.n.nelization.
Surn~nary of Task 517cficiencies ar~rl Alternatives Additional Costs:
$22,701 Analyses and Re-evaluation of Alternatives
$ 1.,612 'I°SM/TD1vI Technical Memorandum
$ 4,317 Added City Council Alternative to analysis
1 258 tldditional intersections with updated Technical Memorandum
$29,888 Total
Task 7: Preferred Alternative
This task is deleted from the scope of work, therefore, a credit of S7,349 (the original budget
amount, including applicable fixed fee) is applied to this amendment.
Task 8: Transportation Discipline Report
't'his task is deleted from the scope of ~~ork, therefore, a credit of $16,391 (the original
budget amount, including applicable Eixed fee) is applied to this amendment.
Task 9: Public Outreach
The remainder of this task (one public meeting) is deleted from the scope of work, therefore,
a credit of $X7,007 (the unused portion of the original budget, including applicable fixed fee)
is applied to this amendment. The original budget amount for this task is $39,343.78. The
total accrued charges to date on Task 9, including the applicable fixed fee, are $22,337.15.
This includes the $21,947.94 invoiced through I~lovember 24, 2006, plus $389.21 incurred but
not yet invoiced.
Summary
Ln summary, the aggregate cost of the added and deleted wank is $1.5,474, as summarized
belo~~.
Task ], -Project Management $26,333
Task 5 - iaeficiencies and Alternatives $29,888
Task 7 -Preferred Alternative ($ 7,349)
Task 8 -Transportation Discipline Report ($16,391)
Task 9 - lyublic Outreach $17 00
Total $15,474
CT I2M H[(~ir is requesting approval of Supplemental Agreement 4 to incorporate the above
described scope of work and budget revisions into our farmal Agreement with the City.
• •
Steve Worley
Page 4
Apri113, 2007
332655.A1
We appreciate the opportunity to work with the City of Spokane Valley. 1f you have any
questions, please call me.
Sincerely,
CM2iVi 1-iIT T
Jim ingfield, Pr
Senior Project vianager
p47 32UU7 l~etter.doc