2011, 05-31 Study SessionAGENDA
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
STUDY SESSION FORMAT
Tuesday, May 31, 2011 6:00 p.m.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11707 East Sprague Avenue, First Floor
(Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting)
DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL
ACTION ITEM:
1. Mary May Avista Energy Grant [public comment] Motion Consideration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NON- ACTION ITEMS:
2. Rick Freier, Assistant Fire Fire Department Canine, Mako Discussion /Information
Marshall
3. Eastern Washineton Universitv Regional Services Presentations:
a. Kevin Pirch, Ph.D. "An Analysis of Regional Discussion /Information
Government and Reforms"
b. Grant Forsyth, Ph.D. "Municipal Economies of Scale & Scope Discussion /Information
and Post - Consolidation Economic
Performance: A Literature Review"
4. Mike Basinger
Urban Growth Area Discussion /Information
5. Deputy Mayor Schimmels,
Solid Waste Update Discussion /Information
Councilmember Gothmann
6. Mayor Towey
Advance Agenda Discussion /Information
7. Information Only (will not be discussed or reported):
a) Spokane Tribe of Indians Casino c) Barker Road Swales
b) 2012 Budget Memo d) Community Development April Monthly Report
8. Mayor Towey Council Check in Discussion /Information
9. Mike Jackson City Manager Comments Discussion /Information
ADJOURN
Note: Unless otherwise noted above, there will be no public comments at Council Study Sessions. However, Council always
reserves the right to request information from the public and staff as appropriate. During meetings held by the City of Spokane
Valley Council, the Council reserves the right to take "action" on any item listed or subsequently added to the agenda. The term
"action" means to deliberate, discuss, review, consider, evaluate, or make a collective positive or negative decision.
NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other
impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921 -1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made.
Study Session Agenda, May 31, 2011 Page 1 of 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 31, 2011 City Manager Sign -off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Energy Efficiency Block Grant: Avista Partnering
Project Update
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Administrative report to Council May 24, 2011.
BACKGROUND: The City approved several projects under the Energy Efficiency and
Conservation Block Grant ( EECBG) program. One of the projects is a partnership with Avista
Utilities for residential and commercial energy audits, whereby the full cost of the audit is
supplemented by EECBG dollars to encourage owners to identify potential energy efficiency
improvements. To generate additional participation, Avista has requested approval to increase
the amount of EECBG subsidy per audit from $138 to $187 so that the cost to the homeowner
is reduced from $99 to $50. Increasing the amount of EECBG funds per audit to $187 will result
in a maximum total of 123 home energy audits.
At the May 24, 2011 meeting, Council directed staff to return with a summary of the other
projects funded with EECBG dollars. The projects and budgets are shown on the attached
table. As shown, the City originally allocated $88,000 for the Utility Partnering project. This
amount was reduced in December 2010 to $23,000 to better meet EECBG project
implementation requirements which include a project completion date of October 2012.
OPTIONS:
1. Do not increase the EECBG fund amount per home audit.
2. Reallocate a portion or the entire remaining EECBG funds for the utility partnering /home
energy audit program to another project approved under the City's EECBG Strategy.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve the proposed increase in EECBG
subsidy per home audit, from $138.00 per homeowner to $187.00 per homeowner thereby
reducing the homeowner's out -of- pocket cost from $99.00 to $50.00.
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There is no impact to the City of Spokane Valley budget.
Increasing the EECBG funding amount per audit would result in a lower maximum number of
audits. However, the reduced cost to homeowners is hoped to increase the actual number of
participants and realize a greater energy savings throughout the residential sector.
STAFF CONTACT: Mary E. May, AICP
ATTACHMENTS: Spokane Valley EECBG Project Summary
EECBG Budgets as of May 2011
18 month obligation period ends mid -April 2011
36 month spending period ends October 2012
Original Current Funds
Project Allocation Allocation Remaining Notes
Flashing Yellow Arrows
$ 33,500.00
$ 33,500.00
$ 500.00
Installations have been completed at seven intersections. Leave project open in
case unused funding is available summer 2012.
Traffic Signal Coordination
$ 75,000.00
$ _
$ _
Project cancelled and funds reallocated to traffic signal LEDs and bike /ped
implementation.
Draft City -wide ITS plan has been prepared and reviewed. Consultant has
Sprague ITS & ITS Plan
$ 400,000.00
$ 400,000.00
$154,482
started design of Sprague Avenue portion of project. Project went to bid this
spring.
Traffic Signal LEDs
$ 65,000.00
$ 90,000.00
$ 35,000.00
Added funding to allow for replacement of 10 -year old red LEDs while
completing green LEDs.
City Building Retrofits
$ 5,350.00
$ _
Project cancelled and funds re- allocated to bike and pedestrian document
project.
Utilities Partnering
$ 88,000.00
$ 23,000.00
$ 20,000.00
May 2011 proposal is to increase project participation by increasing the amount
of EECBG funds per audit,
Two workshops and one technical review committee meeting held. Preliminary
Bike /Ped Master Program
$ 38,500.00
$ 51,$50.D0
$ 21,426.00
route and constraints identified_ City collaborating with Spokane Regional
Health and with school districts to facilitate sidewalk audits surrounding schools.
Engineering consultant assisting with route identification and facility design.
Funding to be used for bike lane striping, sidewalk construction, preliminary
design of Greenacres Trail, or other projects identified through preparation of
Bike /Ped Implementation
$ 100,000.00
$ 215,000.00
$ 215,000.00
Bike and Pedestrian Master Program. Transferring additional funds to this
project will allow a combination of design work and construction to meet EECBG
timelines.
Pre -award consultant
$ 18,000.00
$ 10,000.00
-
Re- allocate unused funds to bike master plan doc
823,350.00 $ 823,350.00
P:1CIerklAgendaPackets for Weblagendapacket 05- 31- 111Request for Council Action Form 5 -31 -11 Attachment 1 draft.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 31, 2011 City Manager Sign -off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Fire Department Canine, Mako
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND: Assistant Fire Marshall Rick Freier will discuss how the Fire Department
acquired Mako, and how Mako helps the Fire Department, and then give a short demonstration.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS: Flyer
Mike 0319 E. Sprague Avenue
SPOKANE VALLEY
10319 E. Sprague Avenue
Spokane FIRE DEPARTMENT valley, WA 9920
Phone (509) 928 -1744 0
Est. 1940 FAX (509) 892 -4125
www.spokanevalleyf rexom
Putting a Bite in Fire Investigations
The Spokane Valley Fire Department is excited
about the newest member of the fire investigative
team. Thanks to a grant from State Farm, Mako
j oined the department in the fall of 2010.
Mako, a Labrador retriever from Michigan, along
with Assistant Fire Marshal Rick Freier,
completed a four week training course in the state
of Maine where Mako was certified as an
accelerant detection canine.
The training was sponsored by State Farm Insurance, conducted by Maine Specialty
Dogs, and certified by the State of Maine Criminal Justice Academy. State Farm
Insurance funded all costs involved in this program which included: acquiring the dog,
training fees at Maine Specialty Dogs, room and board for Mako and Assistant Fire
Marshal Freier, and transportation to and from Maine. State Farm Insurance started the
program in 1992 and has sponsored 250 dogs in 43 states and Canada. Mako is their only
dog in Eastern Washington and one of 75 State Farm dogs currently working in the
country. A total of ten K -9 teams are trained per year.
Assistant Fire Marshal Freier, a certified fire investigator, and Mako will team up to
investigate fires in our coverage area, and in certain instances assist other fire
departments with their fire investigations. Mako is trained to "sniff' out accelerants -
flammable liquids such as gasoline and kerosene that arsonists use to start fires. Evidence
is then collected and used to assist prosecutors in the prosecution of arson cases. Mako
will be working many fire scenes and not all of them will be caused by arson. It is
important to expose the dog to many types of fires.
Local State Farm insurance agents and veterinary
services from Keith Clark of Pet Vet Hospital will assist
in the ongoing costs and care of Mako.
Mako and Assistant Fire Marshal Freier
will also be working in the area of public
education. They believe the best way to
protect the citizens of the district is to
prevent fires from happening. You could
see them at local schools or at community events promoting fire safety.
STATE FARM
4 afth
INSURANCE.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 31, 2011 City Manager Sign -off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Eastern Washington University Regional Services Presentations:
"An Analysis of Regional Government and Reforms"
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
Kevin Pirch is an assistant professor of government at Eastern Washington University where his
research primarily focuses on political parties, campaigns, and voting behavior. His research has
been published in Social Science Quarterly, The American Review of Politics, and other journals
Dr. Pirch received his Ph.D from the Department of Political Science, University of Oregon; his M.S.
from the Department of Political Science, University of Oregon; and his B.S. from the School of
Journalism, and Mass Communication, University of Colorado at Boulder.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 31, 2011 City Manager Sign -off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Eastern Washington University Regional Services Presentations:
"Municipal Economies of Scale & Scope and Post - Consolidation Economic
Performance: A Literature Review"
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
Grant Forsyth, Ph.D. is a professor in the Department of Economics at Eastern Washington
University. His specialty areas are macroeconomics, and money and banking, and he serves
on the Washington State Governor's Council of Economic Advisors, and the Spokane Mayor's
Council on Economic Policy and Forecasting.
Dr. Forsyth received his Ph.D. in economics from the Washington State University School of
Business and Economics; his MBA in Finance from the University of Oregon School of
Business; and his B.A in economics from Central Washington University, School of Business
and Economics.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Review
Meeting Date: May 31, 2011 City Manager Sign -off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Spokane County Urban Growth Area Update
PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: Spokane County and its cities and towns are collaborating on a regional update
of the Spokane County Urban Growth Area (UGA). The UGA is intended to accommodate
twenty years of projected population growth and includes already developed urban land and
areas planned for urban services. A review of the UGA is required every ten years to ensure that
there is adequate capacity to meet the needs of new growth and development in the subsequent
twenty -year planning period.
The Spokane County Comprehensive Plan and UGA were adopted in 2001 and the deadline for
the ten year UGA review is November 2011. The County and City Planning staffs have
completed detailed land quantity analysis to ensure that there is adequate land designated for
future urban development. The land supply evaluation also identifies sensitive environmental
areas so that development is directed away from these areas. The results of this report indicate
that there is currently adequate capacity within existing UGAs to meet future needs for growth
and development.
The remaining tasks include public participation efforts, environmental review, and capital
facilities planning.
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1: City of Spokane Valley Land Quantity Analysis
PowerPoint
1 of1
2011 Urban Growth Area Review
PPd F
P��
,.
11
oil
11111■
I1111gIL�' •s�!
� rf
i�
f
�111
N
IN V.
'""
f ■��er�'
n ■
I�r ■:
■■miill
■ ■IM �■
■ ■rl alot - �i ■rie� ii�J� ®.�.� r�
� J_�
�� -� .��
,■ �
� ■ �
■n ■ ■- ■ ■r •■�■r,�a- �w --
� .
� ,�
l�iOC r ■ �a �=
�
�`atr'Z��l����1•�Ir�■�J��
-rPiv-- r� ■ � ■ �'n�r
�� -
�
a ...�... � 1 ■ mm
■
m
y
■mss . "` "m
���
CENCI
a IM
on
M IN
1.
UGA Review Steps
1. Forecast and Allocation Population �
2. Determine Population Capacity �
3. Study Alternatives �
4. Analyze Services and Facilities
5. Model Transportation Impacts
6. Public Hearings
rn
0
rn
rn
9
o'
7. Adopt Updated UGA
MA
t�
� IN Eli.
iww nn•��
■tam
f ••
County Commissioners'
November 2011 Review and Adoption
of the 2011 -2031 UGA
Fall 2011 Steering Committee Hearing
and Recommendation
Metro Cities Hearings
Summer 2011 and Recommendations
C
D
c
c�
3
c�
c�
Planning Commission
Summer 2011
Hearings and
Recommendations
Spring 2011
SRTC Review
Spring 2011
Public Open House
Winter 2011
SEPAAnalysis
Winter 2011
Capital Facilities Analysis
Fall 2010
Develop Alternatives
October 2010
Public Open House
Summer 2010
Commercial /Industrial LOA
Spring 2010
Residential LOA
Spring 2010
SEPA Scoping Notice
Winter 2010
Develop Study Area
Alternatives
October 2008
Public Open Houses
C
D
c
c�
3
c�
c�
1990 - 2031 Projected Population Growth
2031 Projected New Population Growth = 141,926
700,000
500,OOC
612.226
47 0 ,3 00
300,000 1 1
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
2011 Existing UGA Population Capacity
Unincorporated UGAs 43,023
Spokane
38,027
Spokane Valley
16,493
Liberty Lake
8,460
Airway Heights
3,944
Cheney
3,366
Deer Park
2,405
Medical Lake
763
Spangle
350
Rockford
272
Fairfield
264
Millwood
258
Latah
108
Waverly
67
it Existing Capacity 117,800
Stea A —
IraitrVe Nclud
Future Street
I and a 100 ft buffer is rem
T cel cl be AM ed ii toki eP
ire
:Roads
School Sites
Park Sites
Utilities
Other Public Lands
on
1
•
7 ��
2031 UGA Population Summary
Population that can be
Accommodated in Existing UGAs:
Projected UGA Population
Growth from 2010 to 2031:
Population Capacity Difference
117
113
+4,259
Questions
Urban Growth Area Update
Land Quantity Analysis for
The City of Spokane Valley
September 2010
City of Spokane Valley
RESIDENTIAL LAND QUANTITY ANALYSIS
The City of Spokane Valley is responsible for developing its own Land Quantity Analysis (LQA)
report to determine the amount of land available within existing urban areas to support
residential and non - residential growth. The Steering Committee of Elected Officials will use this
quantitative information to make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners.
County -wide Planning Policies direct jurisdictions to utilize the LQA methodology developed by
the Washington State Department of Community Trade and Economic Development and from
the guidebook, "Issues in Designating Urban Growth Areas ". The Steering Committee of
Elected Officials adopted this methodology on November 3, 1995. This report analyzes land
quantity using the most current data. The analysis incorporates an aerial photography review
to verify the accuracy of various sources of land use data.
Below is a summary of the City of Spokane Valley's application of the adopted methodology:
Step 1
Identify land that can accommodate future growth.
In determining residential land quantity, these lands fall under three categories:
Preliminary and final plats
Platted lots that have not been built on are considered as available and calculated at one
dwelling unit per lot.
Vacantland
Vacant lands are any lot or parcel that does not contain a structure or building, as determined
from the Assessor's records.
Partially used land
Partially used land is land that contains existing residential development but is large enough to
be further subdivided based on the current zoning classification. Partially used residential land
includes properties that can be subdivided into five (5) or more lots, consistent with the current
zoning classification.
Step 2
Subtract all parcels that your community defines as not developable due to physical
limitation.
In most cases throughout Spokane Valley, land can be developed with mitigating measures.
While recognizing that most land has development potential, certain properties have physical
and /or regulatory constraints, such as wetlands, steep slopes, or regulated shorelines. Some
properties may never develop or may develop at densities less than allowed by zoning.
City of Spokane Valley
Therefore, lands containing physical limitations are not included in the residential land supply.
These include the following critical areas deductions:
Critical areas deduction
Wetlands Identified wetlands and an associated 100 foot buffer area are
subtracted from land inventory.
Fish and Wildlife Streams and associated riparian area buffers are subtracted from the
land inventory.
Geologically Hazardous Certain geologic units and slopes over 30% are deducted from
available land inventory. The geologic units include alluvium, mass
wasting deposits and the Latah formation.
The above deductions amount to a 9.6 % reduction of available land supply.
Step 3
Subtract lands that will be needed for other public purposes.
Land needed for public purposes is addressed in two different ways. In the first case, land that
is necessary for new infrastructure, primarily for road right -of -way, is subtracted from the
acreage figures generated in Step 1. A 20% reduction is taken from residential land initially
identified as vacant or partially -used for these purposes.
In the second instance, the Spokane County Assessor's property class codes and exemptions are
used to identify lands that may appear to be vacant but, in reality, are not available for
residential development. These situations involve both public and private properties owned by
entities such as utility companies, school districts, or parks departments. Table 6 illustrates the
Assessor property use codes and exemptions that are deducted from the vacant land supply.
Table 6 - Assessor Exemption Property Use Codes
41 Trans — Railroad
42 Trans — Motor
43 Trans — Aircraft
44 Trans — Marine
45 Trans — Highway
46 Trans — Parking
47 Communication
48 Utilities
49 Trans — Other
67 Service — Governmental
68 Service — Educational
71 Cultural Activity
72 Public Assembly
73 Amusement
74 Recreational
75 Resort- Camping
State Levy Exempt
Public Schools Exempt
76 Park
77 Churches
79 Other Cultural
Cemetery Exempt
DoR Institutional Exempt
Government Property Exempt
Operating Property Exempt
City of Spokane Valley
Step 4
Subtract all parcels which your community determines are not suitable for development for
social and economic reasons.
Deduction for parcels with low improvement value
Parcels appraised at less than $500 land value per Assessor's code are removed from the
available land supply.
Deduction for parcels with high improvement value
Single family residential parcels that have an improvement value greater than 3 times the lot
area are considered unlikely to redevelop and are excluded from available land supply.
Step 5
Subtract ...that percentage of land... which you assume will not be available for development
within your plan's 20 year time frame.
In the adopted Land Quantity Analysis Methodology forSpokane County, a technical committee
of elected officials and technical experts determined that a build -out factor of 70% was an
acceptable average countywide, also referred to as a "market factor ". Therefore, the City of
Spokane Valley assumes that approximately 30% of the total land identified will not be available
for development during the 20 -year planning horizon.
Step 6
Build a safety factor
Building a safety factor is considered a local methodology option to be used if a jurisdiction is
not able to monitor land supply and consumption on a regular basis. The City of Spokane Valley
has not employed a safety factor in past studies due to GIS capabilities enabling effective
monitoring. Additionally, an amendment to the Countywide Planning Policies in 2008
established a strategy for monitoring population growth and mandating land quantity and
population capacity studies when certain growth triggers are met. This strategy is intended to
ensure that adequate land supply will be monitored and maintained throughout the planning
horizon.
Step 7
Determine total capacity.
Assumptions
Residential zones
Low Density: Available vacant land is calculated at a density of 4 dwelling units per acre
Medium Density: Available vacant land is calculated at a density of 11 dwelling units per acre
High Density: Available vacant land is calculated at a density of 22 dwelling units per acre
City of Spokane Valley
Mixed use, commercial and industrial zones
Mixed Use: Within the Mixed Use zone, 25% of available vacant land is counted for
residential use at a density of 17 units per acre.
Light Industrial: No residential use within Light Industrial zones.
Heavy Industrial: No residential use in heavy industrial zones.
Commercial: No residential use in commercial zones.
Population per dwelling unit
Low density residential units are assigned a value of 2.5 residents per household.
Medium density residential units are assigned a value of 2.0 residents per household.
High density residential units are assigned a value of 2.0 residents per household. Mixed use
residential units are assigned a value of 1.5 residents per household.
Aerial Photography Review
A final step in the analysis included a review of recent aerial photography to compare the
results of the GIS analysis to the existing landscape and identify any major errors or anomalies.
The review identified a number of anomalies relating to land determined to be vacant using the
Assessor's property use codes. The LQA was modified to exclude the identified areas from
lands available for development.
2010 Population Capacity
Table 7 illustrates the 2010 population capacity for the City of Spokane Valley using the
adopted land quantity methodology and assumptions as described in this report.
Table 7.0 — 2010 Population Capacity
City of Spokane Valley
Vacant and
Partially Used
Land
Net
Developable
Acres
Potential New
Dwelling Units
Population
Capacity
City of Spokane Valley
3,485.43
1,448.72
7,763.84
17,337.49
Assessor Errors
-46.42
-16.71
- 109.69
- 239.33
R -1 Correction
1 - 124.93
1 -61.95
1 - 242.18
1 - 605.46
Adjusted Total
3,314.07
1,370.06
7,411.97
16,492.70
City of Spokane Valley
COMMERCIAL LAND QUANTITY ANALYSIS
On March 15, 1996, the Growth Management Steering Committee adopted a methodology for
determining commercial land demand. The following is a summary of the City of Spokane
Valley's commercial land analysis using the adopted methodology. The formula does not take
into account current commercial vacancy rates and current developed commercial property
that is currently under - utilized.
The first step in determining the commercial land demand is to identify a growth factor. The
growth factor is calculated by taking the City of Spokane Valley's official population allocation
adopted by the Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) and dividing it by the current
population determined by the Office of Financial Management (OFM). The growth factor is
then calculated by the City of Spokane Valley's commercial acres currently in use. Table 8
illustrates the Assessor property use codes used to identify commercial acres in use.
Table 8 — Assessor Commercial Property Use Codes
Code
Description
16
Hotels and Motels
17
Lodging and daycare
46
Automobile parking
52
Building materials, lumberyard, nursery, florist, and farm equipment
53
Shopping centers
54
Grocery stores, convenient stores, and auto body repair
55
Automobile sales and service
56
Apparel, photography, and laundromats
57
Furniture and equipment
58
Restaurants, fast food, and taverns
59
Miscellaneous retail trade
61
Financial institutions
62
Personal services
63
Business services
64
Repair services
65
Professional services
Spokane Valley did not apply a land utilization factor. The adjusted commercial acres of
demand are then calculated by a market factor of 25% to determine the total demand of
commercial acres. The total demand of commercial acres is then subtracted from the
commercially zoned acres resulting in the demand for commercial acreage.
Using this methodology the City of Spokane Valley determined that there was adequate
commercial property for the next twenty years of commercial growth (see formula below).
City of Spokane Valley
Population Allocation + Current
Population / Current Population = Growth Factor
108,956.00 1 F 90,210.00 1.21
Commercial Acres
Growth Factor X in Use
1.21 1 1,133.56
Commercial Acres of Demand
1,369.11
Land Utilization
X Factor
1.00
Adj. Commercial Acres of
Demand
1,369.11
1,133.56
= Commercial Acres of Demand
1,369.11
Adjusted Commercial Acres
= of Demand
1,369.11
Total Vacant Commercial
Acres of Demand
235.56
Vacant Commercial Acres of Total Commercial Acres of
Demand X Market Factor = Demand
235.56 1 1.25 294.45
Total Commercial Acres of Commercial Acres Total Commercial Acres of
Demand + in Use = Demand
294.45 1,133.56 1,428.00
Commercial Acres Additional Comm. Acreage
Total Comm. Acres of Demand - Zoned = needed
1,428.00 2,638.53 - 1,210.53
Minus indicates surplus
INDUSTRIAL LAND QUANTITY ANALYSIS
The industrial employment forecast for 2031 is determined using a ratio method that compares
industrial employment to total population. This forecast is needed to determine the adequacy
of industrial lands to meet the land quantity needs for the 2031 planning horizon. The forecast
and needs analysis involves several steps as follows:
1. Establish a ratio of industrial employment to total Population
The ratio is established using the 2000 census, which includes detailed employment data for
industrial employees. The categories considered as industrial include construction,
manufacturing, wholesale trade, transportation and warehousing, and utilities. In the year
2000, there were 49,344 people employed in these industrial categories. Since the land
quantity analysis focuses on urban growth area needs, rural industries such as agriculture,
Commercial Acres
- in Use
City of Spokane Valley
forestry, and mining are not included. This number is compared to the total population for
2000 (417,939) to determine a percentage ratio as follows:
10,644 divided by 79,000 = 0.135 or 13.5%
2. Estimate industrial employment for 2010
Estimating industrial employment for 2010 can be achieved by applying the ratio
established in step 1 to the 2010 population for Spokane County. The equation is illustrated
as follows:
2010 population x 0.135 = Industrial employees for 2010
90,210 x 0.135 = 12,178 employees
3. Estimate industrial employment for 2031
The UGA update contemplates land use needs for the year 2031. Estimating industrial
employment for 2031 is necessary to determine future industrial employment needs and
can be estimated similarly to step 2. The equation is illustrated as follows:
2031 population x 0.135 = Industrial employees for 2031
108,956 x 0.135 = 14,709 employees
4. Estimate the increase in industrial employment between 2010 and 2031
To estimate the increase in industrial employment simply subtract the current estimate of
industrial employees (2010) from the 2031 estimate for industrial employees:
2031 employees - 2010 employees = increase in employment for planning period
14,709 — 12,178 = 2,531 employees
S. Estimate the need for available industrial lands
An industrial lands study was done by Spokane County in 2000. The study provided a
detailed analysis of industrial lands in the unincorporated areas of the County. Research
within that study established a ratio of 16 employees per net acre of industrial land. This
ratio is used to determine the net acres of industrial land needed to meet the employment
needs for 2031:
(16 employees per acre) / 2,531 employees = 158 acres
The conclusion is that 138 acres of available industrial land is needed to maintain the
current level of industrial use per capita for the 2031 planning horizon. This conclusion is
city -wide and does not include the industrial land needs for unincorporated UGAs.
City of Spokane Valley
In order to evaluate the industrial lands within the City, staff used an industrial land study
developed in 2000 by a committee composed of representatives from various economic
development, business, and real estate organizations. This committee developed a rating
system to evaluate the marketability of land designated for industrial use. The rating system
utilized Geographical Information Systems (GIS) data to evaluate the industrial land in terms of
lot size, availability of infrastructure, and environmental limitations. In this study, industrial
land was classified into five categories or "tiers ". Tier one lands were determined to have all
the attributes to be immediately available for development. Tier two and three lands were
classified as being usable within a 20 -year timeframe. Tier four and five lands were considered
constrained with improvement value, size, or critical area limitations, which essential made
them unavailable for development.
Using this methodology, it was determined that there is 839 acres of tier one industrial
property within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley. In addition, there is
250 acres of tier one industrial property currently in a public /quasi - public use. There is no tier
two or three industrial properties located within the City of Spokane Valley. The majority of the
remaining industrial property was classified as tier four and five considered as land that is "built
out" with little opportunity for redevelopment in the near term. Table 9 summarizes the
industrial land analysis in the City of Spokane Valley.
Table 9: Industrial Land Analysis
Industrial Analysis
Acres
Tier 1
838.9046
Tier 1 (P /Q -P)
250.4862
Tier 4
2349.5993
Tier 4 (P /Q -P)
2.6502
Tier 5
54.5821
Tier 5 (P /Q -P)
22.9966
Totals
3,519.22
Based on the analysis, the needed industrial land for the 2031 planning horizon is 158 acres.
Currently, the City has 839 acres of tier one industrial land. Essentially, the City has four times
the industrial land needed in tier one industrial properties alone. In conclusion, the City
Spokane Valley has an adequate supply of industrial land for the next 20 years
PREVIOUS ECONOMIC STUDIES & ANALYSIS
The City of Spokane Valley, as part of the planning process for the Sprague - Appleway
Revitalization Plan, conducted economic analyses providing a basis for recommendations in the
Plan. The most recent study performed by Gibbs Planning Group, Inc. in 2007 specifically
examined the economic feasibility of establishing a town center in Spokane Valley. The Gibbs
City of Spokane Valley •
study examined three trade area scenarios: 1) Micro Trade Area, 2) Primary Trade Area, and 3)
100 Mile Trade Area. These trade areas are discussed in more detail below.
Micro Trade Area
This model established the minimal possible trade area for the proposed town center site. The
Spokane Valley Mall and downtown Spokane were excluded from the trade area (supply side) in
an effort to create the largest possible retail void. It was expected that this model would yield a
strong demand for neighborhood goods and services. However, the Micro Trade Area analysis
indicated an over - supply of all retail categories except for specialty foods such as ice cream,
bagels, and coffee. Overall, the Micro Trade Area 2006 retail sales were reported at $1.29
billion, with a consumer demand of only $738 million. The Micro Trade Area thus had an over-
supply of $550 million per year or approximately 2 million square feet.
Primary Trade Area
The Primary Trade Area included most of the Spokane Valley region where most of the study
area's (Spokane Valley Town Center) potential shoppers reside. The Spokane Valley Mall and
surrounding retail were included in this model; downtown Spokane was excluded from this
model. The estimated Primary Trade Area's overall 2006 retail sales (supply) were $2.23 billion
with total consumer demand (spending) of only $1.46 billion. This resulted in an over - supply of
$805 million per year or almost 3 million square feet surplus retail stores in the Primary Trade
Area.
100 Mile Trade Area
Due to the relatively remoteness of Spokane, Gibbs' opinion was that it is likely that the total
Spokane trade area extends 100 miles or beyond. The 100 Mile Trade Area would account for
the largest potential demand for retail and restaurants in the greater Spokane region. Within
the 100 Mile Trade Area, most categories are over - supplied especially jewelry, sporting goods
and books. A small demand was indicated for home furnishing, appliances, electronics, and
limited service restaurants. The overall 2006 retail sales (existing supply) was estimated at
$9.48 billion, while the 2006 overall consumer demand was estimated at $8.17 billion yielding
retail over - supply of $1.31 billion. This results in an existing over - supply of up to 4.7 million
square feet of retail space in the Spokane Region.
City of Spokane Valley
J
r
w 1.
#• i ��t .� f ■ ` � ` ..` I � �-� .` '� - ��# rl �'
4 ■:_ R � � }�� � ! iW� I I,s�, - I '�`+4 '7; '�
IL
It
l
' �J "l r �) -- ' -.. �.1 T ....E ' _ • d 1,1 �[^ `�`°T w'� °�' e ..Jt I I
-20 �� 44fPR G4 of LaM yWanrnyknalys�a Re[Phi -
y
City of Spokane Valley
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 31, 2011 City Manager Sign -off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Solid Waste Update
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND: Deputy Mayor Schimmels and Councilmember Gothmann will lead a
discussion on the topic of solid waste.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS:
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
For Planning Discussion Purposes Only
as of May 26,2011; 3:30 p.m.
Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative
To: Council & Staff
From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager
Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
June 7, 2011, Study Session Format 6:00 p.m. [due date Tues, May 311
1. Admin Report: Airway Heights Plan Review Renewal — MaryKate McGee (10 minutes)
2. Street Vacation, STV 01 -11 —Micki Harnois (15 minutes)
3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Towey (5 minutes)
4. Info Only: Graffiti Laws and Policies [ *estimated meeting: minutes]
June 14, 2011, Council /Staff Summer Retreat, 9 a.m. — 4 p.m., CenterPlace Classroom
June 14, 2011, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon, June 61
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
2. First Reading Proposed Ordinance re STV 01 -11 Street Vacation — Micki Harnois (15 minutes)
3. Motion Consideration: Airway Heights Plan Review Renewal — MaryKate McGee (10 minutes)
4. Admin Report: Sprague Ave: One -Way vs. Two -Way - Neil Kersten, Cary Driskell, Mike Jackson (45 minutes)
5. Info Only: (1) Broadway Ave Safety Project 40063; (2) Indiana Sullivan Concrete Inter Project 90113
[ *estimated meeting: 75 minutes]
June 21, 2011, Confirmed no Meeting, (A WC Conference, Spokane, Wa)
June 28, 2011, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon, June 201
Proclamation: Parks & Recreation Month
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance re STV 01 -11 Street Vacation — Micki Harnois (15 minutes)
3. Proposed Resolution Adopting 2012 -2017 TIP — Steve Worley (10 minutes)
4. Motion Consideration: Bid award Broadway Ave Safety Project #0063 — Steve Worley (15 minutes)
5. Motion Consideration: Bid award Indiana Sullivan Concrete Inter. Project #0113 — Steve Worley (15 minutes)
6. Info Only: Dept Reports [ *estimated meeting: 60 minutes]
July 5, 2011, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Proposed 2013 TIB Project List — Steve Worley
2. Landscaping and Signage Discussion — Scott Kuhta
3. Advance Agenda — Mayor Towey
July 12, 2011, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
I. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
July 19, 2011, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Bike & Pedestrian Master Program (BPMP) —Mike Basinger
2. Proposed 2013 TIB Project Applications — Steve Worley
[due date Mon, June 271
(15 minutes)
(45 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: 65 minutes]
[due date Tues, July 51
(5 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: minutes]
[due date Mon, July 111
(15 minutes)
(15 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: minutes]
Draft Advance Agenda 5/26/2011 4:08:49 PM Page 1 of 3
July 26, 2011, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon, July 181
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Admin Report: Revenues & Expenditures for Preliminary 2012 Budget — Mike Jackson (30 minutes)
3. Info Only: Dept Reports [ *estimated meeting: minutes]
August 2, 2011, Study Session Format Confirmed no meeting: (National Night Out)
August 9, 2011, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Tues, Aug 11
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2012 Revenues & Property Taxes (15 minutes)
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance, BPMP — Mike Basinger (15 minutes)
4. Motion Consideration: Approval of Proposed 2013 TIB Project List — Steve Worley (10 minutes)
5. Admin Report: Review of ordinance that levies 2012 property tax — Finance (15 minutes)
6. Admin Report: Review Ordinance to Confirm Tax Levy — Finance (15 minutes)
70 City Manager's Presentation of Preliminary 2012 Budget - City Manager (30 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: 105 minutes]
August 16, 2011, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon, Aug 81
1. Outside Agency Presentations — Finance ( -60 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: minutes]
August 23, 2011, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon, Aug 151
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, BPMP — Mike Basinger (10 minutes)
3. Motion Consideration: Set 2012 Budget Hearings for Sept 13 and Sept 27 — Finance Director(10 minutes)
4. Info Only: Dept Reports [ *estimated meeting: minutes]
August 30, 2011, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon, Aug 221
1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Towey (5 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: minutes]
Wed, August 31, 2011, confirmed Joint Council and County Commissioners Meeting, 9:00 a.m. — Noon,
Spokane County Fairgrounds, Bay 4. Tentative agenda topics TBA.
September 6, 2011, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Towey
[ *estimated meeting: minutes]
Sentember 13.2011. Formal Meeting Format. 6:00 D.m.
1. Public Hearing: 2012 Budget — Finance Director
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance, 2012 budget Property Tax
4. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 2012 budget, tax confirmation
[due date Mon, Aug 29]
(5 minutes)
[due date Mon, Sept 51
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(15 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: 45 minutes]
Draft Advance Agenda 5/26/2011 4:08:49 PM Page 2 of 3
September 20, 2011, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Towey
2. Fee Resolution Review —Finance
September 27, 2011, Formal Meetine Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Public Hearing: 2012 Budget — Finance Director
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, 2012 budget Property Tax
4. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 2012 budget, tax confirmation
5. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Adopting 2012 Budget
6. Info Only: Dept Reports
October 4, 2011, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda — Mayor Towey
October 11, 2011, Formal Meetine Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Adopting 2012 Budget
3. Proposed Resolution Amending Fee Resolution for 2012 — Finance
Bidding Contracts (SVMC 3. — bidding exceptions)
Budget amendments (2011)
Centennial Trail Agreement
Clean Air Agency
City Sign Plan
Commute Trip Reduction Program Renewal
East Gateway Monument Structure
Economic Development
Governance Manual (resolution) Update
Investment Accounts (includes monthly report)
Liberty Lake City Sign
Lodging Tax Funding for 2012 (Oct 2011)
Milwaukee Right -of -way
Mission Ave Design (Mission & Long ped. crossing)
Monument (Veterans') Sign
Old Mission Ave Trail Access
Parking/Paving Options (for driveways, etc.)
Pavement Management Program Update
Prosecution Services
Public Input Process for Capital Projects
Railroad Quiet Zone
Shoreline Master Program, Chapter 1
Sidewalks
Signage (I -90)
Site Selector Update
Solid Waste Amended Interlocal
Speed Limits
[due date Mon, Sept 121
(5 minutes)
(15 minutes)
[due date Mon, Sept 191
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(15 minutes)
[due date Mon, Sept 26
(5 minutes)
[due date Mon, Oct 3]]
(5 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(20 minutes)
Signs/Landscaping (SVMC Chapter 22)
Sprague Appleway Corridor Environ.Assessment
WIRA, Water Protection Commitment, Public Educ.
*time for public or council comments not included
Draft Advance Agenda 5/26/2011 4:08:49 PM Page 3 of 3
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 31, 2011 City Manager Sign -off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
® information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Request to comment re: proposed Spokane Tribe of Indians casino in
Airway Heights.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: 25 U.S.C. 2719
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: On April 14, 2011, the City received a notice from the United States Bureau of
Indian Affairs that the Spokane Tribe of Indians (Spokane Tribe) is proposing to construct a new
casino to be located on the West Plains near Fairchild Air Force base. The purpose of the
notice is to offer potentially affected jurisdictions an opportunity to comment on whether they
would anticipate being impacted by the project. It lists six areas where they seek comment on
potential impacts, including environmental, social structure (social infrastructure, services,
housing, community character), economic development, general impact to surrounding
community, anticipated costs for gambling addiction treatment, and any other information that
may assist in the decision of whether it would be detrimental to the surrounding community.
After consideration of the distance from the project, the cost to do an impact study in the time
allowed (60 days from receipt), and the experience of other jurisdictions who have attempted to
meaningfully participate in such comment opportunities, it is staff's recommendation and intent
to respond back to the Bureau identifying that the City has no comment.
OPTIONS: Identify if the Council would like to staff to conduct an in -depth impacts analysis.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, Acting City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS: Notice from Bureau of Indian Affairs
United States Department of the Interior
�rsr o Bureau of Indian Affairs -
Northwest Re tonal Office
�� 911 NE 1 t Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97232 -4169 era MERTCA
APR 0 8 2011 _
Subject: Consultation request for a Two -Part Determination iri accordance with Section 20 of the
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act for the Spokane Tribe. of Indians' West Plains Casino and
Mixed -Use Development Project
Dear Local Agency Official:
The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is initiating consultation with appropriate state and local governments
and nearby Indian tribes in accordance-with Section 20 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) (25
U.S.C. § 2719) in response td a request from the Spokane Tribe of Indians (Tribe) for a Secretarial .
Determination that their proposed West Plains Casino is in the best interest of the Tribe and its members
and not detrimental to the surrounding community.
The proposed casino would be Iocated within an approximately 145 -acre parcel of.laud held in federal
trust for the Tribe just west of the City of Airway Heights and immediately northwest of the intersection
of Craig Road and U.S. Highway 2 (see Exhibit A and B). The proposed project may include, but is not
limited to, a variety of proposed land uses including'a casino, 300 -room hotel, conventiorrlbanquet center,
commercial retail uses, offices, entertainment facilities, and related internal roads and parking (see
Exhibit Q. The approximately 118,700 square -foot casino would house approximately 2,500 electronic
gaining devices, 50 card game tables, and 10 poker tables.
The BIA respectfully requests that you submit written comments, if any, on the following areas within 60
days of receiving this letter:
1. Information regarding environmental impacts on the surrounding community and plans for
mitigating adverse impacts; `
2. Anticipated impacts on the social structure, infrastructurc,, services, housing, community
character, and land use patterns of the surrounding community;
3. Anticipated impact on the economic development, income, and employment of the
surrounding community;
4. Anticipated costs of impacts to the surrounding community and identification of sources of
revenue to mitigate them;
5. Anticipated costs, if any, to the surrounding- community of treatment programs for
compulsive gambling attributable to the proposed gaming establishment; and
6. Any other information that may assist the Secretary in determining whether the proposed
Tol E 0
J would or would not be detrimental to the surrounding community.
APR 14 2011
.pity of Spokane Malley
Cbmments should be submitted in written form, and addressed to the following individual:'
Dr. B.J. Howezton
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Northwest Regional Office
911 NE 1 Ith Avenue
Portland, OR 97232
If you have any questions or need additional infonnation, please contact Dr. B.J. Howerton,
Environmental Protectiofi Specialist, at (503) 231 -6749.
Sincerely,
o w �ial Dircctor�
S pokan��
jValley
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921 . 1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
Memorandum
To: Mayor and Council
From: City Manager, Mike Jackson; Finance Director, Ken Thompson
Date: May 23, 2011
Re: Budget Direction for 2012
We thought it would be helpful to share the direction we have given City Directors for
preparation of their 2012 Budget Worksheets and Business Plan. This direction was developed
based on discussion and input from the Finance Committee. This format will be the basis of
discussion and input from the full Council at the June 14 Budget Retreat and future budget
meetings. Listed below are the general guidelines that have been discussed with Department
Directors:
1. Limit 2012 increases in budget (General, Street and Storm Water Funds) to 1% over the
2011 budget. Exceptions, if any, will be noted.
2. The 2012 Business Plan will not reflect 3% - 9% decreases.
3. Continue to set aside dollars for replacement of equipment and buildings.
4. 2012 budget should include anticipated increases in contracts for services.
5. The 2012 budget proposals will include funding of a 2.5% cost of living allowance for all
employees.
6. The budget will be based on zero increase in the property tax levy which will remain the
same as 2011 at $10,700,000 plus delinquencies.
Fiscal Policies carried over from the 2011 Budget process include:
Financial Management
1. Maintain basic service levels with reduced resources
2. Minimize personnel costs /overhead by continuing to contract for many services
3. Continue the 6 -year Business Plan Process
4. Leverage City Funds with grant opportunities
5. Minimize City debt with pay as you go philosophy
Financial Objectives
1. Maintain a minimum general fund ending balance of 15% of revenues through 2014.
2. Maintain the Service Level Stabilization Fund at the current level of $5.4 million through
2014
Challenges
1. Funding Street Capital Projects
2. Funding the Street Preservation Plan to maintain City streets
3. Funding Parks Capital Projects
There was also a commitment in the 2011 Budget to reduce 2010 General Fund Expenditures by
3% and to cut future General Fund expenditures by at least 3% based on the 2010 Multi -Year
projections. These commitments were accomplished.
At the February 2, 2011 Retreat, Council established a Fiscal Policy to transfer funds from the
General Fund to a new Street Capital Improvement Fund. There is currently $1.1 million in that
fund.
Council will receive a draft of the Budget Worksheets in advance of the June 14 Budget
Retreat. Additionally, you will receive a draft of the 2012 Business Plan. Included in the
Business Plan will be a Summary of Impacts outlining notable changes or reductions. We will
also include an Executive Summary of Programs which will compile the major programs of the
City for easy reference.
The budget will continue to focus on long -term sustainability.
We look forward to working with Council on the 2012 budget.
S pokan��
jValley
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921 . 1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
Memorandum
To: City Council, Mike Jackson, City Manager
From: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
Date: May 23, 2011
Re: Barker Road Swales
At the May 17 Council meeting Councilman Gary Schimmels raised concerns about the
dandelions and overwatering of the swales on Barker Road. Attached are photographs of all the
swales_ There are 6 swales along Barker. Swales 1, 2, 4 and 6 are the responsibility of Spokane
Valley. Swales 3 and 5 are the responsibility of the Riverwalk 1st Addition Homeowners
Association. The City's swales 1, 2 and 4 do have some dandelions and have not been treated
this year because of the wet weather. They have been mowed on a regular basis, so the
dandelions have not gone to seed. They are scheduled to be treated this week. In addition to the
wet weather part of the problem in this area is that adjacent parcels are extremely infested with
dandelions. At this point in the year I feel that our contractor, ProCare, is doing a good job on
the swales.
In regard to the concern for overwatering swales, the typical grass lawn needs about 2 -4 inches
of water per month to remain growing and green depending on temperature. Spokane averages
1.18 inches in June, 0.76 inches in July and 0.68 inches in August. In the City of Spokane the
average summer monthly water usage is about 33,750 gallons per household. About half of the
33,750 gallons is used for outside irrigation. Below are the water usage and costs for last year
for the swales on Barker Road. The water usage last summer appears to be very reasonable
based on the above information.
Additionally, on older facilities we are considering upgrading to smart sprinkler controllers.
Smart controllers use sensors and weather information to manage watering times and frequency.
As environmental conditions vary, the controller increases or decreases irrigation. Smart
controllers have the ability to turn off your sprinklers automatically during rain, high wind or low
temperature. Smart controllers may reduce outdoor water use by an average of 15 to 30 percent.
They also reduce over watering, which can cause fungal disease and insect problems.
Please let me know if you have any concerns.
Water Usage - Consolidated Irrigation District
New Bridge
Swale
Account #
11982.2
11983.2
11984.2
12584.2
Gallons
Cost
gal /sf
Gallons
Cost
gal /sf
Gallons
Cost
gal /sf
Gallons
Cost
April
943
$13.50
0.15
3186
$15.82
0.44
3357
$16.03
0.31
May
3745
1 $16.52
0.60
5041
1 $18.14
0.70
1 5326
$18.49
0.49
June
3242
$15.89
0.52
4422
$17.36
0.61
5000
$18.08
0.46
July
3731
$16.50
0.60
5089
$18.20
0.71
7494
$21.20
0.69
8650
$39.11
August
4377
$17.31
0.71
5437
$18.63
0.76
7933
$21.75
0.73
$26.29
September
1 7186
1 $20.82
1 1.16
1 7246
1 $20.89
1.01
1 10279
1 $24.68
0.95
1 3793
1 $16.58
2010
Totals 23224 $100.54 30421 $109.04
39389 $120.23 12443 $81.98
Total Cost to water 4 Barker Swales $411.79
Swale # 1 — East side of Barker between Sharpe and Boone. 6,200 s.f.
Maintenance responsibility: City of Spokane Valley
Swale #2 — Southeast corner of Mission and Barker. 7,200 s.f.
Maintenance responsibility: City of Spokane Valley
Swale #3 — East side of Barker. Runs the entire length from Mission to Indian. 18,000 s.f.
Maintenance responsibility: Riverwalk 1 Addition Homeowners Association
Swale # 4 — Between Indiana and East Riverway. 10,800 s.f.
Maintenance Responsibility: City of Spokane Valley
Swale # 5 — Northeast corner of East Riverway and Barker. 4,400 s.f.
Maintenance Responisbility: Riverwalk 1 5Y Addition Homeowners Association
Swale # 6— East side of Barker just north of the bridge.
Maintenance Responsibility: City of Spokane Valley
Spokane
Valley
PERMIT CENTER
Community Development
Monthly Report
April 2011
_Revenue
Permits
Permit revenue for April 2011 was $97,632. This figure is ahead of April of last year.
Permit Revenue
$300,000
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$0
� In
is
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
2011 Revenue 2QIQ_ReM
Land Use
Land Use revenue for April 2011 was $12,424. This figure is ahead of April of last year
Land Use Revenue
$16,000
$14,000
$12,000
$10,000
$8,000
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$0 =
Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
02011 Revenue 02010 Revenue
Page 1 of 8
0 0*4 �,
0 61 ane
,; Val ley
Dom; 1 iii
Community Development
Monthly Report
April 2011
e ofinancutlr�anaementPermitlnfornurtion /Permitslssuedl
April 2011 Residential
New
Structures
Separate
Dwelling Units
Demolition
Permits
Dwelling
Units
Demolished
Single Family
Residence
6
Duplex
Triplex
4 -Plex
Apartments
April 2011 Commercial
New
Buildings
Tenant
Improvements
Additions
4
13
1
' Per the currently adopted Master Fee Schedule, valuations reported above for commercial and residential
construction permits are "assigned based on the value of the construction work as stated by the applicant or the
value calculated by the Building Official using the latest valuation data published in the Building Safety Journal by
the International Code Council, whichever is greatest."
Page 2 of 8
The valuation' for April 2011 was $6,147,034.
Spokane
Valley
ye"nit.�ctivit�
Certificate of Occupancy
Community Development
Monthly Report
April 2011
Certificate of Occupancy's were issued for an addition at Central Premix; Craft Brewery Tap Room,
and Jimmy Johns at 615 N. Sullivan
Permits Issued
Community Development issued a total of 338 permits in April 2011. Commercial permits issued
included: Kim Hotstart at 5723 E Alki, Focus Fitness with a new 18,000 sf building at 2426 Dishman,
and an addition for Jacobs Upholstery.
f —
Construction Permits Issued
f
600 f
500
400
300 �
200
100
0
Land Use Applications
A 7 -lot short plat was approved
Commercial Pre - application Meetings
There were 10 pre - application meetings in April including CarMax, a community residential facility, a
daycare, 2 storage buildings and an event center.
Hearing Examiner
The Hearing Examiner did not hold any hearings in April
Business Registrations
Staff approved 190 business registrations in April.
Home Occupation Permits
Staff approved 62 home occupation permits in April.
Entertainers Licenses
Staff processed 7 adult entertainment licenses for April.
Page 3 of 8
Jan
I Feb
Warl
Apr lMavlJunelJulv
lAug Set Oct I Novl
Dec
r 2011 Permits
159
121
246
338
- 2010 Permits
158
200
259
256 12411284
1263 1328 1508 1366 246
231
Land Use Applications
A 7 -lot short plat was approved
Commercial Pre - application Meetings
There were 10 pre - application meetings in April including CarMax, a community residential facility, a
daycare, 2 storage buildings and an event center.
Hearing Examiner
The Hearing Examiner did not hold any hearings in April
Business Registrations
Staff approved 190 business registrations in April.
Home Occupation Permits
Staff approved 62 home occupation permits in April.
Entertainers Licenses
Staff processed 7 adult entertainment licenses for April.
Page 3 of 8
Sp okane Community Development
,� � ,r�l�� y Monthly Report
Y April 2011
Express Permits
There were 6 Express permits processed in April.
SEPA
Three SEPA determinations were issued for a 41 -lot plat; a 6,600 sq. foot addition to Jacobs
Upholstery, and Argonne corridor upgrade.
Ckstomer S'E'ryke
The Permit Center staff assisted 406 customers at the counter and handled 417 customers' inquires
by phone in the Permit Center during April.
The Permit Center staff provided an average target date of 10 working days for Commercial projects,
3 working days for Residential platted and 10 working days for Residential un- platted. This target
date represents the time to first comments issued to the applicant.
A letter of appreciation from David Steele was received regarding the exceptional service he received
from Deanna Griffith on a floodplain issue.
I�BCtZOnS
Right of Way Inspector:
The Right -of -Way inspector performed 598 inspections in April.
Right -of -Way Inspections
1200
1000
800
600 0
400 Q 0 0
200
0 Jan Feb Mar Apr M 1u July A S Oct N -0
O 2011 388 376 396 598
G 2019Ri21 491 773 852 1007 941 9AL704 859 1003 755 482
Page 4 of 8
Spokane
Valley
Community Development
Monthly Report
April 2011
Building Inspectors:
The City's Building Inspectors performed 490 residential inspections and 153 commercial inspections
in the month of April.
10002011 Residential
Building 100
Inspections
Performed
10
1
® 2010 Residential
Development Engineering Inspector
During the month of April the Development Engineering Inspector performed 2 site inspections.
Development Engineering Inspections
40
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2011 Residential
296
275
395
490
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2010 Residential
393
387
397
557
498
522
531
403
581
525
437
379
2011 Commercial
115
109
150
153
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2010 Commercial
229
187
27
180
163
185
201
312
196
170
137
120
Development Engineering Inspector
During the month of April the Development Engineering Inspector performed 2 site inspections.
Development Engineering Inspections
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 ■ 2010
Page 5 of 8
Spokane
Valley
UPDATES
Planning Commission
Community Development
Monthly Report
April 2011
The Planning Commission held one meeting in April due to a lack of quorum at the first meeting.
Planning Commission training was conducted at their April 28 meeting.
2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendments /Updates
Staff continues to work on CPA- 02 -11, a site - specific map amendment located at the intersection of
Walnut and Valleyway. Currently, staff is working on a development agreement to minimize the
impacts of the proposed project. The balance of the Comp Plan amendments was completed in April.
Growth Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials (SCEO) —
The Steering Committee conducted a meeting in April with PTAC staff presenting information on the
Urban Growth Area update process.
Shoreline Master Program
Staff continued to work with the Shoreline Advisory Group on the review of the draft Shoreline Master
Program Goals and Policies. The Group met twice in April.
Street Vacation
On April 12, Staff presented to the council an overview of the City's Street Vacation process. On April
26, Staff presented a resolution to City Council, initiating a street vacation at the request of the
Spokane Valley Fire Department.
Community Development Block Grant
On April 26, Staff presented a draft agreement for Spokane Valley to continue participation as a
consortium member with the Spokane County Community Development Block Grant program.
Code Amendments
A code amendment to permit livestock in the Mixed Use zones was completed in April.
Department yYide
Energy Grant
Public Works continues to implement transportation projects that will result in energy conservation
and carbon footprint reduction. See the paragraph below for updates on the Bike and Pedestrian
Master Plan.
Washington State Energy Strategy Update Process
The Washington State Energy Strategy update process provided an update to the legislature and the
Governor December 1, 2010. The update was not intended to be a comprehensive revision. The full
revision is expected to be delivered to the legislature and the Governor in December 2011. The
meetings for the full revision began in January and are scheduled throughout 2011. One meeting
was held in the Tri- Cities in April to discuss energy issues primarily related to transportation.
Although planning regulations and their impact was a part of the discussion, there were no land use
planners involved in the discussion and Commerce staff indicated that the meeting was poorly
attended.
Page 6 of 8
Spokane
Valley
Bike /Pedestrian Plan (BPMP) —
Community Development
Monthly Report
April 2011
Staff continues work on draft text for the BPMP, including formatting and map preparation.
Coordination with the Spokane Regional Health District and the Valley school districts continues.
Walking audit maps have been prepared and are awaiting input from the schools for preferred Safe
Routes to School (SRTS) route selections. Staff has been working with a consultant to prioritize bike
and pedestrian improvements.
Economic Development
Staff completed work on an agreement for Hanson Properties. This will enable the property owner to
have reliable traffic counts for future development and provide some transportation improvements for
the city.
Staff is working on an Economic Development strategy to present to Council at their June 7 joint
meeting with the Planning Commission.
ADA Study
The core group has completed the initial review of the data compiled on program access. The full
work group will revisit some of the survey questions and may need to refine the responses to meet
the intent of the survey. In addition, the group will approve a list of questions that will be forwarded to
the Disability Business Technical Assistance Center for clarification. The full work group will also
develop a consensus for the draft report and develop a potential schedule for the next public meeting
and presentation to Council of the draft report and transition plan. Staff has determined that the
sidewalk data provided by the WSU Spokane Regional Health District study is adequate for the
sidewalk element of the self - evaluation process therefore, sidewalk inventories have been
suspended.
Wellhead Protection
Staff attended the April wellhead protection meeting.
Regional Partnering
The Regional Partnering Group has completed an updated Energy Code Information sheet for use in
all area jurisdictions. The group is also looking at the possibility of re- writing the administrative
provisions of local municipal and county codes to be more uniform with regard to permit application
and permit expiration time frames. In the meantime, the Building official group continues to work with
local homebuilders and HVAC companies to assure consistent application of the State codes..
Permit Tracking System
Community Development staff will present the Admin report to City Council on the purchase of a new
permit tracking system in May. Meanwhile, County staff has been given approval to begin
negotiations with Paladin, the software vendor for the SmartGov permitting system. City staff also
received confirmation that piggy- backing on the Island County RFP is acceptable which, if purchase
is approved by Council can lead to a substantial price break for the City's purchase of the SmartGov
system.
Department Training
Tom Melbourn and Rob Guerry attended a seminar on Wall bracing.
John Homan attended a supervision and performance measures class.
Kathy McClung attended a Planning Conference on economic development, the religious freedom
act, and other planning issues.
Other
Lori Barlow was promoted to Senior Planner after a competitive process of presentations, interviews
and a writing exercise.
Page 7 of 8
Spokane
,;
Community Development
Monthly Report
April 2011
Code Cam pl&nCe Citizen Action Requests
Code Compliance officers received 45 Citizen Action Requests in April. All complaints received must be
investigated, even if just to determine that no violation exists.
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
SMP Citizen Advisory Group Meeting
05 -12 -11 Planning Commission Regular meeting, UGA Update, Roberts Rules of Order
Training
05 -18 -11 FSMP Citizen Advisory Group Meeting
05 -26 -11
Planning Commission Regular Meeting —Public Hearing STV -01 -11
05 -26 -11
BPMP Workshop, Central Valley District Building
06 -07 -11 Joint Council /Planning Commission Meeting
06 -08 -11 BPMP Open House, Council Chambers
06-09 -11 Planning Commission Regular Meeting
06 -19 -11
Jan
06 -23 -11 Planning Commission Regular Meeting, BPMP Study Session
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
o Clear View Triangle
0
2
1
0
* Complaint - No Violation
1
1
1
6
■ Environmental
0
0
0
0
❑Junk Auto
6
3
6
8
Cl Property
4
4
8
11
QSigns
0
1
0
5
MSolid Waste
9
9
14
15
2011 Code Total Violations Reported - by Category
UPCOMING DATES OF INTEREST
INTEREST
05 -04 -11
SMP Citizen Advisory Group Meeting
05 -12 -11 Planning Commission Regular meeting, UGA Update, Roberts Rules of Order
Training
05 -18 -11 FSMP Citizen Advisory Group Meeting
05 -26 -11
Planning Commission Regular Meeting —Public Hearing STV -01 -11
05 -26 -11
BPMP Workshop, Central Valley District Building
06 -07 -11 Joint Council /Planning Commission Meeting
06 -08 -11 BPMP Open House, Council Chambers
06-09 -11 Planning Commission Regular Meeting
06 -19 -11
Hearing Examiner — Roth Subdivision
06 -23 -11 Planning Commission Regular Meeting, BPMP Study Session
Page 8 of 8