Ordinance 11-007 Amending Comp Plan 1 +
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 11-007
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY
WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE 06-010 ADOPTING THE CITY OF SPOKANE
VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY
RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, through Spokane Valley Ordinance 06-010, the City of Spokane Valley adopted
Land Use plans as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan, and Maps as the
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Spokane Valley; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act(GMA) allows comprehensive plans
to be amended annually(RCW 36.70A 130); and
WHEREAS, amendments to the City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan may be initiated by
the Planning Commission (Commission), the City Council (Council), Citizens or by the Community
Development Director based on citizen requests or when changed conditions warrant adjustments; and
WHEREAS, the GMA requires comprehensive plans to be implemented with development
regulations, including the zoning of property consistent with land use map designations;and
WHEREAS, consistent with the GMA, City of Spokane Valley adopted Public Participation
Guidelines to direct the public involvement process for adopting and amending comprehensive plans; and
WHEREAS, the Uniform Development Code (UDC) provides that amendment applications shall
be received until November 1 of each year; and
WHEREAS, applications were submitted by the applicant, owner or by City staff to amend the
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map for the purpose of beneficially using the property described herein;
and
WHEREAS, following the application to the City, staff conducted an environmental review to
determine the potential environmental impacts from the proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS, after reviewing the Environmental Checklists, staff issued Determinations of Non-
significance (DNS) on February 4, 2011 for the proposals, published the DNS in the Valley News Herald
on February 4, 2011, and where appropriate posted the DNS on the sites and mailed the DNS to all
affected public agencies; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified on February 4, 201 l
pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106 providing a 60-day notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Spokane
Valley Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Commission conducted a briefing on February 10, 2011, to review the proposed
amendments; and
WHEREAS, on February 4, 2011, notice of the Commission public hearing was published in the
Valley News Herald; and
•
Ordinance 11-007 Comp Plan Amendments Page 1 of 5
WHEREAS, on February 4, 2011, notice of the Commission hearing was mailed to all property
owners within 400 feet of the subject property; and
WHEREAS, on February 4, 2011, notice of the hearing was posted on the subject properties; and
WHEREAS, the Commission received evidence, information, public testimony and a staff report
and recomrnendation at a public hearing on February 24, 2011; and
WHEREAS, the Commission conducted a public hearing on February 24, 2011, to consider
proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan map and Zoning map. After hearing
public testimony, the Commission made recommendations on comprehensive plan map amendments
CPA-01-1 1 through CPA-08-11; and
WHEREAS, on March 22,2011, Council reviewed the proposed amendments; arid
WHEREAS, on April 12, 2011, Council requested that CPA-02-1 1 be removed for one month to
have staff work on a development agreement to minimize the impacts of the proposed development; and
WHERAS, on April 12, 2011, Council requested that CPA-03-11 be processed through
Ordinance 11-009 and Ordinance 11-010; and
WHEREAS, CPA-02-11 and CPA-03-11 are being considered in conjunction with the annual
2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendments pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130; and
WHEREAS, on April 19, 2011, Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the
proposed amendment; and
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2011, Council considered a second ordinance reading at which time
Council approved written findings of fact setting forth their basis for recommending approval of the
proposed amendments.
NOW,THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the Comprehensive Plan
adopted through Ordinance No. 06-010.
Section 2. Findings. The City Council acknowledges that the Commission conducted
appropriate investigation and study,held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to Comprehensive
Plan and approves the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan map and text. The City Council hereby
adopts the Commission's findings, specifically that:
1. Notice for the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald on February 4, 2011
and each site was posted with a"Notice of Public Hearing" sign, with a description of the proposal.
2. Individual notice of the map amendment proposals was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of
each affected site.
3. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA—RCW 43.21C) environmental checklists were
required for each proposed comprehensive plan map and text amendment.
4. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each
comprehensive plan amendment request. Determinations of Non-significance(DNS)were issued for the
requested comprehensive plan amendments on February 4,2011.
Ordinance 11-007 Comp Plan Amendments Page 2 of 5
5. The DNS's were published in the city's official newspaper on February 4, 2011 consistent with the City
of Spokane Valley Environmental Ordinance.
6. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on February 24, 2011, to consider
the proposed amendments. After hearing public testimony,the Commission made recommendations on
CPA-01-1I thru CPA-08-11
7. The planning goals of the Growth Management Act (GMA) were considered and the proposed
amendments are consistent with the GMA.
8. The goals and policies of the Spokane Val ley Comprehensive Plan were considered and the proposed
amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
9. The proposed zoning designations are consistent with the current use of the properties,
10. Findings were made and factors were considered to ensure compliance with approval criteria
contained in Section 17.80.140 H. (Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide rezones) of the
Uniform Development Code (UDC).
11. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and text amendments will not adversely affect the public's
general health,safety, and welfare.
Section 3. Property. The properties subject to this Ordinance are described in Attachment
Section 4. Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130 the City of
Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan as adopted through Ordinance No. 06-010, is hereby amended as set
forth in Comprehensive Plan Attachment "A" (maps) and Comprehensive Plan Attachment `B"
(text). The Comprehensive Plan Amendments are generally described as follows:
Map Amendments
File No. CPA-O1-11:
Application/Description of Proposal: Privately initiated, site specific comprehensive plan map
amendment to change the designation on parcels 45231.0109, 45231.0210, 45231.0211, 45231.0212,
45231.0213,45231.0214,45231.0216,45231.0218,45231.0224,45231.0226,45231.0114 and
45231.0215 from Mixed Use Avenue(MUA) to Neighborhood Center(NCT)with a corresponding
zoning change from Mixed Use Avenue (MUA) to Neighborhood Center(NCT). This proposal is
considered a non-project action ender RCW 43.21C. This amendment will not be necessary if CPA-03-
11, removal of the Subarea Plan, is approved.
Applicant: Dwight Hume; 9101 North Mt. View Lane; Spokane, WA 99218
Amendment Location: The proposed site is located on the southeast corner of Progress Road and
Sprague Avenue; further located in the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 23, Township
25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington.
Council Decision: To be determined
Text Amendments
File No.: CPA-04-11
Description of proposal: Chapter 2 — Land Use: City initiated comprehensive plan amendments will
update Table 2.1, Spokane Valley UGA Land Capacity Analysis, to reflect new population numbers within
the City of Spokane Valley; will update Map 2.1, Land Use, to display land use designation changes
approved through the 2011 amendment process.
Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 2—Land Use will have citywide implications.
Council Decision: Adopt amendments to Chapter 2—Land Use as proposed by staff.
Ordinance 11-007 Comp Plan Amendments Page 3 of 5
f �
File No.: CPA-05-11
Chapter 3 —Transportation: City initiated comprehensive plan amendment will update Map 3.2, Bike and
Pedestrian System, to display newly developed bike and pedestrian infrastructure.
Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 3 —Transportation will have citywide implications.
Council Decision: Adopt amendments to Chapter 3 —Transportation as proposed by staff.
File No.: CPA-06-11
Chapter 4 — Capital Facilities and Public Services: City initiated comprehensive plan amendments will
incorporate changes in the 6-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) into the Capital Facilities Plan to
ensure consistency; will update special purpose district's and other city service provider's facility and
service data; will add capital projects such as city hall, parks, and public works storage facility to be
included for the use of BEET finding; will update Maps 4.1, 4.2, and 4.5 to reflect the latest capital facilities
and public services; will update the growth assumptions to reflect population allocation numbers approved
by the Spokane County Board of Commissioners.
Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 4--Capital Facilities and Public Services will have
citywide implications.
Council Decision: Adopt amendments to Chapter 4 — Capital Facilities and Public Services as proposed
by staff.
File No.: CPA-07-11
Chapter 7 —Economic Development: City initiated comprehensive plan amendment will update Map 7.1
to display new building permits and land use actions in the 2010 development cycle.
Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 7—Economic Development will have citywide
implications.
Council Decision: Adopt amendments to Chapter 7—Economic Development as proposed by staff.
File No.: CPA-08-11
Chapter 8 —Natural Environment: City initiated comprehensive plan amendment will update Map 8.3 to
display the field inventory work done in conjunction with DNR to update stream typing in Spokane Valley
and update Map 8,4 to display the latest Federal Insurance Rating Map (FIRM)data.
Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 8 — Natural Environment will have citywide
implications.
Council Decision: Adopt amendments to Chapter 8—Natural Environment as proposed by staff.
Section 5. Copies on File-Administrative Action. The Comprehensive Plan (with Maps) is
maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well, as the City Department of Community Development.
The City Manager or designee, following adoption of this Ordinance, is authorized to modify the
Comprehensive Plan in a manner consistent with this Ordinance.
Section 6. Liability. The express intent of the City of Spokane Valley is that the
responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and
their agents. This ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health,
safety, and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals
or organizations.
Section 7. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause,
or phrase of this ordinance.
Ordinance 11-007 Comp Plan Amendments Page 4 of 5
•
Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5)days after
publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane
Valley as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council this 26th day of April _ 011
M yor,Thomas E. Towey
ATFE
-City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge -
Approved As To Form:
eorr.--- t • ID44.,4641
,
Office of -ie City Attorney
Date of Publication: 6 6 --
Effective Date: -/j-//
Ordinance 11-007 Comp Plan Amendments Page 5 of 5
{
Comprehensive Plan Map
---- •- .. -1--I-
U
h .
C1 _____,-11 - -
______ ______A 2v:;,ily,,• -,-,..-..,-.;,
1
, . rir3r ;/ ./f/ I 7-7*-. •
1
1 14 // ''-- •-----
•
IN:NN‘1/2-NN,,.. . A A / ,_,
I
or . ,FF / • •
. „...„.„. _,„ is, 1
,.....,..,6„,._ .
_.. - ,. tip.
P6...S.6%._ . lks.1%*,*.—. ‘.,k' :`%..N . . %.,,4:
•
•
211(1.
211
— - - — —
CPA-01-11 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map
City of Spokane Valley designation from MUA to NCT; subsequent zoning 1
Community Development Department change from MUA to NCT.
I
I (
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
quality of water runoff, Furthermore, development of a wellhead protection program with the
various water providers should provide guidelines to avoid possible contamination.
Policies contained in the Natural Environment chapter provide direction for development near
wellheads and in aquifer recharge areas. For a complete discussion of water resources and water
purveyors in the City of Spokane Valley, refer to the Capital Facilities chapter.
2.3.3 Parks and Open Space
One of the most important and valued elements of a high quality living and working environment is
a parks and open space system. Providing parks and open spaces contributes to a reduction in
environmental impacts such as noise and air pollution; increases the value of adjacent properties;
provides areas for passive and active recreation; and helps preserve the natural beauty of the City.
2.3.4 Natural Environment
Spokane Valley's natural beauty is apparent. Streams, wetlands, surrounding mountains and the
Spokane River provide a scenic backdrop as well as a source for active and passive recreation for
the citizens of Spokane Valley. The Land Use chapter seeks to protect Spokane Valley's unique
natural resources through policies that support the preservation of these areas for future
generations. The Natural Environment chapter also includes a discussion of critical areas as
defined by GMA. For a complete discussion, please refer to the Natural Environment chapter.
2.3.5 Housing
Housing is a basic human need and a major factor in the quality of life for individuals and families.
An adequate supply of affordable, attractive, and functional housing is fundamental to achieving a
sense of community. The central issue related to land use is supplying enough land to
accommodate projected growth for a range of incomes and households. Presently, housing is
provided primarily in single-family subdivisions.
This plan sets forth strategies to increase housing options and choices. The Land Use chapter
advocates changes to current development codes to increase flexibility in platting land and
encourage housing as part of mixed-use developments in commercial areas. The latter provides an
opportunity to locate housing closer to employment and shopping, and to create affordable housing.
A complete discussion of housing can be found in the Housing chapter.
2.4 Potential Annexation Areas
2.4.1 Projected Growth
In October 2003, the City of Spokane Valley received a 2000 population certification from the U.S.
Census Bureau that indicated 80,927 people called Spokane Valley home on April 1, 2000. As of
April 1, 2003 the population had grown to 82,005 (based on the Washington State Office of
Financial Management (OFM) population estimates). Upon incorporation on March 31, 2003, the
City of Spokane Valley became the state's ninth largest city and second largest in Spokane County.
po a e- alley race +e ar. OF 1--yep tlon eetim to to ApF1-PI;-200+-e#-.8,"7960-.—This-ne;
population estimate-Frieved--Spek ee-Volley-#fonw4he-stete's4nanth-lar est- l}+-te-k+e-state's eig1flh
largcct city die-2 04-vpala stirnate flasks-an-annual increase of a roxlmately 2,11 percent
over-the-city's 2003 population eetlmato. The most recent OFM estimate for Spokane Valley is
68792090 210 as of April 1, 20082010. This figure po a.JlatiQn increase represents an annual growth
rate of approximately 1.51.0 percent since 2009. The average annual growth rate is approximately
17.0.1 4170% over the_ .`? year period from 2003 to 20072010. Future population growth is
forecasted at the state and county level by OFM. This future population growth was distributed
between jurisdictions and unincorporated Spokane County through a methodology prepared by the
Spokane County Steering Committee of Elected Officials (SCEO). Tina City+-efekaac Valley-was
peF alas t d e eiat+ar� FS aFi i+�ally-ecca,�sa the ity kee l-r e4-I son•inoerpoFated-wf en this
estien took place_ However;-ifie-Gounty-dial--alloca-le population to the 'Spolkan° V alley IUG"-
r
wilich-includethe-Frey cities-ol-Spokane- lley+-arid Liberty Lake.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 2 -Land Use
Page 9 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Thic process-resulted-in a-pep+ laden-growth-allocation-of 36031 ta-Ihe-Spok le Valley IUGA, This
aU A-else--inn lees--area Rhin the UG° Ihit °re ct] in unR rfPeratec pekane County -The
g ph-abo e-ind ta-s- pokane- Ile} 20 year population-u-sin{-a 1,6 -and-2,5% annual-growth
Using the.-man average annual growth rate of 1.37%, witch is consistent with past estimated
ewth-rates-ir e-Spek a- lley afea the estimated 2025 2031 population of Spokane Valley is
111,755120,145 or an increase of 30-,&4$29 935 persons. TIRe Flo-anneel--growth rat e-Fes-e ts-44
202- pYReieull=al+ien-o 4-1 1 a-increase`-o157.051. `� L]p_!Y11 J
pekene- all tio�tion rt4Tf-o 44 n t e-e4eFaI-tan
capacity methodology. This request -wa-s-p-Fapesed os an 'intoFi seek-besesi--en--llee
landlrlepulatiensapaeity-within--using-wipe ate-beundaries--ef Spokane Valley. The reason•
fer-this--req las „roc beeea oc tka--sigolf i e at d e water treatment capacity.
nee-4h= _ . _ . _._ :, _pekenc Valley-will--prepay—a-revision-to-I4:1e
mien-allocation oral-pFesetft-this-in rmalier t e EC. This issue is dseue.sed-in-mere
d etail-beloie RCW 36-7QA l satires that at least every ten years the Incorporated and,
.tninaomorated portions of the designated urban growth areas and the densities permitted therein,.
be reviewed and revised so as to ensure tliel the urban growth areas are sufficient to occomm sate
the urban growth that is erojectec kOFM to occur in the county for the succeeding 20 year
period.The Spokane County Board of C ufnty-Ge-m-m-issi& cis-(--Be C)-appreved thls-•populalion
operation-in--Nevemt -2004r
e- ily--has-sent r od to refine the-poolatlen-prekee€lens based on the preceding-IRferrnotion. At
o City tae_ - _ • ; e - ;. ._ i! _ :unci] directed staff te- iIize-a--1-49%
annual-growth rate-ter dfposes-efepvtsalat tan-f sresestieg,-7'#is--ree+aRed in a 20 year--pepulation
forecast-oI-384129--persens. This- No n atlon was pFeseet to the SCEO on February 15, 2006
when-the City officially requested a 20 yeaFpepulatiefl-alleeatien-of 14--for plenni -melee
In 2006On June 9 2009 the BoCC approved via Resolution 96-94809-0531 a population
allocation of 3. .12518,746 for Spokane Valley for planning purposes.
2.4.2 Land Capacity Analysis
The GMA does not require a Population and Land Capacity Element to be included in the
comprehensive plan. However, GMA does require that Land Use, Housing and Capital Facilities
Elements include population densities, building intensities and estimates of future population
growth. The GMA also requires a Land Capacity Analysis, or the theoretical holding capacity of the
designated Urban Growth Areas, which by definition includes cities. By assigning the expected
population growth to the results of the Land Capacity Analysis, the area required to accommodate
the population growth is shaped.
Countywide population forecasts are identified by the CWPPs, as one criterion for consideration in
developing a regional methodology or countywide population allocation. The countywide growth
target is based on the OFM growth management population forecast for Spokane County.
The Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County was developed through the efforts of
the Land Quantity Technical Committee between March 1995 and October 1995. The Growth
Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials adopted that methodology on November 3,
1995.
The adopted methodology is patterned after the Washington State Department of Community,
Trade and Economic Development's (CTED) land quantity inventory guidebook entitled Issues in
Designating Urban Growth Areas Part I- Providing Adequate Urban Area Land Supply. Use of that
document was specified by the adopted Countywide Planning Policies (Policy Topic 1 (Urban
Growth Areas Policy#3). However, the step-by-step CTED process was modified somewhat by the
Land Quantity Technical Committee to reflect unique circumstances in Spokane County. The
following steps of the regional methodology were followed by Spokane Valley in conducting the
land capacity analysis:
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 2 -Land Use
Page 10 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
1. Identify lands that are potential candidates to accommodate future growth - vacant,
partially-used and under-utilized land (in other words, subtract all parcels committed to
other uses).
2. Subtract all parcels that the community defines as not developable because of physical
limitation.
3. Subtract lands that will be needed for other public purposes.
4. Subtract all parcels that the community determines are not suitable for development for
social and economic reasons.
5. Subtract that percentage of land that the community assumes will not be available for
development within the community plan's 20-year time frame.
6. Build in a safety factor.
7. Determine total capacity.
Spokane Valley prepared a land capacity analysis of the city and surrounding UGAs based on the
above regional methodology. The results of the land capacity analysis are contained in the table
below:
ITable 2.1 Spokane Valley UGA Land Capacity Analysis(updated 12.4_15.050ctober 2010q
Vacant and Not Dovolopablo Potential New Population
Area Partially Used Acres [)welling Units Capacity
Land .
Spokane ated 4;599 .314 4,203;t,3Z0 7,4337.442 17 -0416.4
(Incorporated Area) 0
I1eeihemt 4a I 24 I I $
Nefthweoti I I 1.3137 I m-to.
Eest 98 I .407 427 I J, aB
Southeast 487 I I grR.2 2.394
S9Iatii Fa€4 I 2 I 47040 ;_._rx«
i Pontiaraaa 6 4
I 76 8R - - $9
arp-sI1111-9isl: ais 4.0 432 807 4,349
TOTAU &.45tJ I 2;464 I 12,675 �R.733
Spokane Valley recommended to the Steering Committee that both the City of Spokane Valley and
the City of Liberty Lake receive an interim population allocation that could be accommodated within
the existing city limits of each city. The rationale for this recommendation was based on the
situation regarding sanitary sewer throughout the entire Spokane region.
It is estimated that the Spokane County treatment plant will run out of capacity in 2009, and the
Liberty Lake Water& Sewer District treatment capability is currently at or near capacity. Permits to
expand the Spokane County and Liberty Lake plants from the Washington State Department of
Ecology and the Environmental Protection Agency are currently in doubt. Given the potential
constraint for both jurisdictions to provide this vital urban service, the Steering Committee
forwarded a recommendation to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners to allocate
only the population that could be accommodated within existing city limits until such time as the
sanitary sewer issues are resolved.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 2—Land Use
Page 11 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
2.4.3 Potential Annexation Areas
The purpose of this section is to identify the unincorporated areas within the existing Spokane
County UGA that are adjacent to the City of Spokane Valley, which would comprise potential
annexation areas for the City. Map 2.2 indicates potential annexation areas (PAAs) for the City of
Spokane Valley.
Spokane County adopted its first comprehensive plan developed under GMA in 2001. A complete
examination of urban services was required at the time the County established the UGA, moreover,
Spokane County was obligated to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act. The County's
plan included the designation of a regional UGA, which included the still unincorporated area of
Spokane Valley. The County utilized the SEPA/GMA integration process to fulfill the environmental
review requirements of the plan including the designated UGA.
When Liberty Lake incorporated in 2001 and Spokane Valley incorporated in 2003 much of the
"Valley UGA" was included as part of the newly created cities, but not all. In 2003 and again in
2006, Liberty Lake completed annexations totaling 975.69 acres of the County designated UGA.
These annexations resulted in a nearly 34 percent increase (from 4.5 square miles to just over 6
square miles) in land area for Liberty Lake.
Ae -1'abie 2-1 E ed-i r er of tin cpGrated ' -adjacent to Spokane Volley
Several e` these UGAs are el -contiguous to Spokane Valley ;:s'^ki.11};-southeast and northeast)
and would be logical areas for future annexation to the City of Spokane Valley. Spokane County
and the metro cities of Spokane Valley, Spokane, Liberty Lake and Airway Heights have begun the
process of updating the regional UGA consistent with the county wide planning policies (CWPPs).
Through this process, the City of Spokane Valley will identify areas needed to accommodate
allocated population growth by re-evaluating land quantity analysis and urban service delivery.
2.4.4 Development of Goals, Policies,and Actions for Annexation
The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires counties to designate Urban Growth Area (UGAs)
within which urban growth shall be encouraged RCW 36.70A.110 (1). UGAs are to include
sufficient land to accommodate the twenty-year population growth projected for the county. The
GMA imposes planning requirements to influence the ability of a city to annex UGAs. A city is
required by GMA to adopt policies for land use, housing, capital facilities, utilities, and
transportation within the city's UGA. In order to meet this requirement the City of Spokane Valley
has developed policies and goals to provide policy guidance for annexation of territory within UGAs.
Annexation will have financial impacts on the city; it may be positive or negative. The City may
need to develop an annexation study to
assess the financial impacts especially for .
•
larger annexations. The Capital Facilities
chapter identifies current service
providers within the Potential Annexation
Areas (PAAs) as a starting point for the
detailed analysis that may be needed _
prior to annexation. tt `•':Yn , .
2.5 Land Use Designations -U ° '`.,:�
The land use designations in the SVCP .q. -x , ?,
recognize the relationships between ;._ „ •;ti ,,.' ,'r
broad patterns of land uses. The -.; ;.ttt r• 1- � ,:•,. • . .
designations set forth locational criteria • � x` .. ' : °'` ''x '
for each specific class of uses consistent :�� ';w :.f-'' �' •
with the long-term objectives of the , - "• •'- j' �' '
SVCP. These designations provide the
purpose and intent for specific zoning districts. The location of the comprehensive plan land use
designations are shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map (Map 2.1).
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 2– Land Use
Page 12 of 36
{
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
4.4.2 Growth Assumption
On June 9, 2009, the Spokane County Board of Commissioners (BoCC) approved a population
allocation of 18,746 people for the City of Spokane Valley. The allocation is the amount of people
the City can accommodate within its current municipal boundary. In addition, the BoCC approved a
population allocation of 8,138 people for the unincorporated Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) adjacent
to the City of Spokane Valley. The City of Spokane Valley has identified the adjacent UGAs as
Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). The City has identified existing service providers to help
determine the effects on existing levels of service in the event of annexation. Capital facilities
planning activities within these UGAs continue to be the County's responsibility.
The following population data is used for capital facilities planning purposes:
Ta#rte Pc }ulat€on Projoalioll
B4FF 2000 2046 2030
Poptilatl1i 89;440 04,864 4Ek6,7at
Taibl44.4 P$rPlalIon Protect€on
Year agh 2 iI
P1)pul4 Ian $1.$x§ 96.3ff7 127.,604
4.4.3 Level of Service
Cities are often defined by the quality of facilities and services that are provided to its residents.
Good road, sewer and water infrastructure are typical criteria used by businesses considering
relocation. Park and recreation facilities are increasingly used to judge the quality of a City.
Businesses want to locate where they can attract the best employees, and quality of life issues are
often the deciding factor for a person to move to a new area.
Level of service standards are quantifiable measures, such as acres of parks per 1000 people, or
the amount of time it takes to travel a road segment during peak morning and afternoon "rush
hours," the higher the level of service the higher the cost. This element establishes levels of
service which will be used to evaluate the adequacy and future cost of urban facilities and services.
4,4.3 Concurrency
The Growth Management Act introduces the concept of concurrency, which requires new
development to be served with adequate urban services at the time of development, or within a
specified time thereafter. The GMA allows six years for necessary transportation improvements to
be constructed as long as a financial commitment is made at the time of development. The GMA
strongly encourages concurrency for water and sewer, and it is good public policy to require the
same.
4.4.4 Financing Facilities and Services
The City is limited in its ability to finance all desired capital facility projects. Options must be
available for addressing funding shortfalls or decisions must be made to lower levels of service for
public facilities. In deciding how to address a particular shortfall, the City will need to balance
current needs versus future growth requirements; existing deficiencies versus future expansions.
Capital facilities plans must be balanced. When funding shortfalls occur, the following options
should be considered:
a. Increase revenues,
b. decrease level of service standards,
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-272010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 12 of 71
I l
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
Spokane Valley anticipates either constructing a new City Hall building, or purchasing and
remodeling an existing building within the six year time frame of this CFP. The following table
shows that Spokane Valley will use approximately $1,000,000 of Real Estate Excise Tax revenue
for Civic Buildings.
Taw0-44-C•emir+imity-Faclull-ea-Flna rel+1g-Wao I
CI
liFojeet I •X007 2008 aAO9 2410 2044 Teal 1
Civic Fnealdaes I I i 4553 I 550 7130 -1.300 1 31163
Tool $ 4 I 0 4533 €50 41.399 1-1E.3
-
Real-��ta Exclse Tax f j arE40 •60 *9G 40G
Generals I I 2#21 345+9 NO 4T2C0 ; ea
eta j 0 _, c 66.3 ire no 4.300 3163
•
Table 4.6 ConimunfIv Factlitlas Flnaaclnil Plan(Dollars In Thousands).
Project 2411 2012 2013 2014 201 2016 Total
.
Civic Fecilitleg + 1 Ca 100 400 400 400 a low 1
puhilcWorks I 630
1
Total ' S00 IL.1 I + IN AN IN 25/212
Rovenal a$Oc@
riaktata c•se Tax 1 100 1 C-3 I 104 200 100 200 IN
S Cal-Flunk. I I j •• 0 20Q 312 I 2.0 I .92)
' Street Fund I 256 1 1 1 1 250
I G
l. pptr Fun[i I —I X50
Da 600 100 400 300 400 4.20 OM
4.4.8 Domestic Water
The City of Spokane Valley does not own or operate a public water supply system. Rather, water is
provided to Spokane Valley residences and businesses by special purpose districts, associations,
and public and private corporations. Water service is coordinated by Spokane County through the
Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP), which identifies service boundaries, establishes
minimum design standards and promotes the consolidation of regional water resource
management. The CWSP is updated as needed at the direction of the Board of County
Commissioners or the Washington State Department of Health (DOH).
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 16 of 71
1
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
-TrF 1e-44-BFrvtiene•Vel Icy.4Valor.P urvoyere--Group-A-Syelex1&
UFrent-Reek:Iei;11-al Gttrfara-Nen-IieSider<Nel 8 $
r ruin A Sysleltts GanneG110116 Corpie-ettoi+6 17aprEige liy
r Bayoti a-i aNcer 0 4 0
$rya[ - 4 -4 69
G 2Fpl5epe igaalitrn-0ietriot -- - 455 I ] 0
fe al.Pra Mix -Stilllven-W 4 li 4 0
Ity-eg p,loan ts77-06i. I 0 a1o14-eiarlad
Qea&alidaied-Irrl0461-40-SyeIem-#
- 3OG3 54 — 2.750, 0
-
Gxnsaldate l ilg 95 Q Sy - 3C ' 44-1 2 9,9A9
C-0e pekaAa�WaEeF 31st-4 --- 1-1-€4 -
i Pi 4,037..00P
Ht11011iR&6R-IFrTgalIoi1 Dl tt1 - - . 7 —0 - 40 1a
Harrr}ywall-gleslrealc 1(g 2 4 0
Irvir1-lAVater-Dielr.l - - - - 7 - - - - Q I 000400
Kaleer luFR---T-reRl ieed- egm -- 0 2 -. I 21:200
•rvl,Fel IrrigaGcm-Drs1#4-B 244$ 4 .. J:bubo
.419 ;alerGe 4302 4 1-;G90-909
Q rch rd y r o l.-llallon-Gial-6 4145 - - -- • 0 .I a
I. ell4119b1le-kome-erk 44-44 I 9 400
P•. :3llaile 0 9
4;).1148re-PP13-Anel-C-e1eity Q 87
;poEiio- :o...inefe v 1 16tri81-park 0 247 L 4-78,400
Sp bean-park I 0 299
S pGkarl Ca-W6t9F-l&[*3 P788 I 4.2. 6T43507QQQ
:1fentweee-ar4 ltlon DJcie.10-2 .1470 Q 1,120,000 __
45Jeollaraa-4k Tralicr Callrl - -— 30 Q I $ —
^7-Appahimaiely.uq-cconeCr44.FWingir} -p1 S keee-valiog
S Fusee=4r raEF,lag!ert£ESte al.epaiirr eol of 1-1es1N►
Table 4.7 Sis oka rie Va11ev Wele r P.rv9yo rk-G_royrra A SY21482
.S coracle
roa A Sy5lerrl� Current Rc lde[It[al cwr nt Han Ras ldontial Capacity
Connocllons cop necl lots
4Uora9t
BavotrOnBarker 1 0 t I 9
B arger Royal 4 1 N
I
.Camhppe I rrlgallan DIsirtct 7 19g 0
Central I}ra Ntlx:-SL lIlvan Rd d 1 U
C11vofSpakans' 69717• fil. Not roporled 1
Cansolidated Iril D[st 19 SysRem 1. .N.42 iii$ j 2,750,000
pansc'idated Irrig DI .1 19 System Z .0.1,0 12$ 2.200,000
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 19 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
fast Spokane Water i +st 1 jQQ 94 1,277.000
tlLehltison iriI arlon Dist#16 4 :1, 0.0110
HUnew l[Electronic Mu1fc LLC x I 1 I
Irvin Water District § I 1 697 1..240.04Q
Falser AIuOi• freI1ty odWArts $ -21100
MViode1rigalipn Dist#1Q 261:8 $ - 550000
Modern Electrllc Water Cg 7.4.24 $ 1.500,000
orchard Avarn,r*irrigation Dist 6 4
Ptnecroil Mobile Home Pent ]4 — —
Puerle Valltrrla' 4 — — 1 ~- Q
RltSre Pub And E levy 2 87
,R43k�ne Business$�fndusirlal Parr Q 2.02 478.000
_ I
Spokane, y?_Mifatleau Pafk 4 2 ?JO
5.1gAgole Co DICE#3 7 @ 1 1.01/0.9
er r waad Irrloalion Dlalcl —— - 1727 1B 1.120,0
Vera Water Power 9259 ,t` 9.B60,o0Q
b'4bodrand Park TraFeiZatii 4 [ Q
Aoorcxtmaiely ale gonnedf:a js tiMtdaGiLY or Spokane Valley
.Source- Wrahlnotan State Deoortmanl or Health
Table 4.8 Group B Systems
Group B System Connections
Holiday Trailer Court 12
Janzen&Janzen 1
Levernier Const.Water System 1
Mercer Trucking Co Inc 1
Middco Tool&Equipment 1
Systems Transport Inc 1
Tci Water System 6
Tds 2
Union Pacific Railroad-Trentwood 1
Westco S Apparel Service 3
Western Structures Inc 2
WSDT-Plnes Road Maintenance 1
Source: Washington State Department of Health
Level of Service
The Countywide Planning Policies were amended in 2004 to defer level of service standards for
water supply and fire flow to the requirements of the Department of Health and local fire codes
respectively.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 20 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Valley adopts by reference water system plans for all water purveyors providing service
within the City of Spokane Valley.
Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities
Spokane Valley adopts by reference water system plans for all water purveyors providing service
within the City of Spokane Valley.
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
Spokane Valley adopts by reference capital project and financing plans for all water purveyors
providing service within the City of Spokane Valley.
Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Service
Fire protection and emergency medical services I
•
(EMS) are provided by Spokane Valley Fire
Department (t iahhicl No. 1 VFQ) and Spokane
County. Fire District No. 8. Spelne--hits} �,.
T'IfeSVFD serves over 90% of the Valley, while
District 8 serves a few small areas in the southern i
part of the City(see Fire Districts Map at the end of .:_ __ s
this chapter). Both districts serve the City with a full r •
range of fire suppression and EMS services. . I F •
Spokane Valley voters chose to annex tv-Spelkene r _.-
liey--I`irinto SVFD and District No. 8 in
September, 2004.
Insurance Rating
City Wire departments a..ci '.re nrotectian Q.,-¢d, l-are assigned a numerical fire protection rating by
the Washington Surveying and Ratings Bureau. Insurance companies fund the Bureau to perform
on-site inspections of fire districts to determine the rating. The Bureau analyzes five main areas:
average response time, water supply, communication network, schedule of fire inspections and fire
station evaluations (which focus on age of vehicles), personnel training and staffing of facilities.
Insurance companies use the fire protection rating to help determine insurance rates on all fire
insurance policies. The rating is on a scale of one to ten, with one representing the best score.
Quality of fire service can have a significant impact on fire insurance rates, particularly for
commercial businesses. As-e4 rFilr.2:'i '., Spokai Val'ey nre—DepactraentSVFD has a Fire
Insurance Rating of fee three (3) and District No. 8 has a Rating of five f5), both indicating geed-
exce'len9 fire protection services.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities
Page 21 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Inventory of Existing Facilities and Apparatus
The Fire Districts Map shows the location of fire stations and service area boundaries for Spence
Valley-FireSVFD, District No. 8 and surrounding fire protection districts. All fire agencies have
mutual aid agreements to assist each other in major emergencies.
alrcane- alley Fire- 0088SVFD 2011 apparatus inventory includes Flir j0 Glass—ATvee
eng#Ie8Englnes, t 3 Type II Engines.33 Class A pumper/ladders, , three brush
trucks and other miscellaneous vehicles for staff, training, rescue, maintenance, prevention and
command. Se e- lley-!e VFD has ten stations, including e1 t-seven within the City of
Spokane Valley. Locations of the stations are as follows:
I Ta Ca d, pokaoa-Valley-Fire
I I;11.6410 SgativM roatleols
I 1 4lea 1 10210 EaelAir-ape
I 61atie + 8007 EMI-Trent
I elaHOn-3 122Ne#h-klawtastl
I Station-4 221 6 Ea st V"fclle toy —
I
gtattaWraA I1 asV,beFletia
Sta.4or+61. 6 A EaaF3 a4 re
Stallea 1./21 Seulh-E-J.reveen
I a4FHl#N� Nerit 0 VQ1Ibtrr
&telly-B 4+# �
S#atl^ Ci East 17217 Spawn
I " IRBF4$- i0l A$-V-.11f6yLGIly LliMil�
JI an�lC er3l sttlerr
Table 4.0 Spiek$n@ Valley Fire
I
DeParitleatliati on Lock=
I
Station 1" 11031al=asLSerape
I W.110.n 9111 t= Frederick
I
—
Slaiinn 3 2218 Koran aiarvrd
s
.Stellen 4 22g6 East 4VEgesrev
. tertua ' 15510 East fi1larieta
I Stalin 9• 1 6309 East Scrape
I
Mellon 7' 1121 Soulli Everoreen
I .5211k11 8' NQrIh 2110 Wilbur
Stollen 9' r=est 12121 32'°
Graeeoeres Slatinn' I t 1721; ` ,qy
I " rnslde SQokaala Vallsv City Lin i'1s
Fire District No. 8 has one fire station inside the City limits, station 84 in the Ponderosa
neighborhood, located at 4410 South Bates. The District has two stations located outside the City
limits providing additional coverage, No. 81 at 6117 South Palouse Highway and No. 85 at 3324
South Linke Road. Stations 81 and 84 each have two Class A engines and two wildland brush
engines. Station 85 has one Class A engine and one wildland brush engine.
Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 22 of 71
,
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Level of Service
pelt ne Valley Fir The LeVel of Service goals for response time are as-fa Iewe described in
SFVD's Standard of Cover- SVFD's Standard of Cover is coa;sistent with the regionally adopted
minimum level of service for fir EPLOIWion end emergency services..
• 5:00 minbite;s-80 h--e#-I3e time fer tre--sails
• 5:00n%In+los 60% of the time-for--Basle-Life-Su poFt- )
•--BAA-rnlneLcs B0% of tho time-fer-Advensed-Life LrppOF1-(l LS3
Isis--Life Seppa refeFs-to-•a-level-of-ainir g--That does not involve any air edl+ l
pfer eeures-or drnanistru 9F� f-d{Hgs. BLS providers con provide b l$ie--life saving-and-life
e+staining-in-tervei # r}s-Mwnile-tranc orting a patient to o bespil l_T-kis-is-the-four laNen--on-vvk iol-1
all medical care is briilt -Geed-basis-life-support-Is..key-te-et1i3ival of c0t40y--sick and injured
patients,
Advanced--Lif u e refers-tt-a--eeF#,aii-Ieval-e#-sere--that-Fnay-lie-provided-to patient-by-resue
'sound meFnberr�if-iesessaFy,litainbers-traine -in-ldvenced I iia Q,.puorr tieoh e6 are often
referred to as 1 L- rptovida€s,Arnorig-othef-p 6ed ,4t roviders orb oble-to-a-04Finistcr cortairi
life-saving-medications, per.-form advanc Bring of hearl-Fhythr 3nd-afe--Lr"alned-•lo•peFfprmn
vanse -proserturos te-open-a nd-manage•a•patient's airway.,
Average-response-tirnes-for-fire-sells-the poet 1 years are as-toHews
• 2003 5 minLitec 22 soconde
• 2002 5 ninti'^° '' e.;ds
• 2001 6-F 1inutee-2Ft-seooncle
•T4&4 is4.0sl= historic response time data does-not dlstingais i-betrrecn-types-e salts---ll ufe-data
w ile ion will div se•1ts--between-fire;-AL -and-BLS:
S#ekanek-Velley-Fire-496466f4111-ree e led to an-average -alts-for year from "'0m 0 204& The
following table shows the number of calls per year.
Ta630 4.10 DEaira l.1 biro-Responses
:Veer 2fl04 2en-1- $ooa $4a3
Re once 7r��. 740(1 8446
•
Table 4.10 Spokane Valley Fire Department CO f2 •soorr +4s
year 1 :8270 IIII I ?04fi l 2007 1 1921 1 1922 1 M12
ciik R4-5119.LI s 10086 948D g.n4
The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County establishes minimum levels of service for
fire and emergency medical services as follows:
Urban areas are required to be serviced by a Fire District with at least a Class Six Insurance rating.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 23 of 71
l �
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
• Urban areas must be within five road miles of an operating fire station that provides service
with a "Class A" pumper, unless structures are equipped with fire sprinklers.
• Urban areas shall be served by a state certified basic life support (BLS) agency within five
miles and an operating advanced life support unit within six miles or ten minutes response
time.
Both F-irc!- ist=iv`--.SVFD and 8 meet the minimum countywide level of service standards.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spekene Valley Fire has ldentilled-twe--efeae-withln the City of Spokane-- faltey haE-peed
improvement In response times and is pleenieg-to--ser t new stations te-aFevide-impFevea
service levels- Tho moot--k, eRt-needr-is-tg- Fnvic -bailer-oveFag the cou ley. and the
Distriet-is-plarming-t9-m$ve ie -No- 9 to Ikre visii ity of 32 -Ave. and elms Rd
The northeast area of the City is underdeveloped at present but as the City grows over the next ten
to fifteen years, t e-1 ietrictsVFU recognizes that a new station will need to be constructed to
provide an adequate level of service. Tl;e-si,at r Station 'II will be constructed l vleE efat
Barker and Euclid.
Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities
Sttl-ia14-.40,9-141-31e`r - . - - ' - -- _ • -. - -; =in to the vicinity of 32'4-and
Pines. The station--will-tFelude Iwo bays and der s-for ht eFSeF el- he`Districl-pleas-to
reconstruct Shtiei-Ne 04nto-a tir a-1 ll -with darmc for tan .el—Station No. 11 will
be located in the vicinity of Barker and Euclid and will alas-behave twe-3 bays with ieffri-s-for-ellht
perso.nnelfire apparatus. Construction for Station 11 is tentatively planned for 2014 or 20162016 or
when growth in the area will support the investment and ongoing costs.
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
pekene Valley FirLII—Depaftme-RISVFD is a junior taxing eet y-tf=ratclistric# ,nd supplements its
regular taxes with special levies. As the restrictions on the taxes generated from the regular tax go
down, special levies are proposed to maintain needed funding. Special levies must be approved by
l=ire–R16trIct voters served by SVFD. The Department does not use its bonding capacity to fund
capital projects. The Department's philosophy is to reserve funds generated through its regular
revenues for future capital needs. The following table represents the Valloy FiieSVFD planned
capital expenditures.
f — 'IaWo4r 1- rr kaiTe-5.+alley-Fire-I-year e0l#at 00-846-a, laa~lar+
1-4:ErGieGA 2406 {10 zoos eo09 201 2014 2012 Total
•
FIre-StatIon•No.C
$4;040 Ft-1,60G
-eeestfuelJar+�j
Fare-Skafleri No. 10
T tai I '$.1-CQ0 I S-1-B69 09:•
Note;--Resew. fua #fem{eguiaFdislflWaxe tiMIF-fund-GeplIaN avememle
1Amiautglo-a p Urri EI 0005
Tama 4.11 svrD Cal.i01 Proie •iS Mx,
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 24 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
PFOteCt 2111 2012 ,2013 2a14 2915 is Toil
Administration Building I
$3,400 $3.400
�Nat4 eon$tniclip
—
Fire Station No. —
$1.5Uip $1,800
fRe onslrudion]
rite Station.11
INcrimoonsinictioni 51_,B30 $1.806
Total s' .tt
II (Amounts are lino
4.4.9 Library Service
Library services are provided by the Spokane County Library District, which serves the
unincoroorated courtly.and eleven of its thirteen cities and towns.. The District has a long history of
excellent service and upon incorporation, the City of Spokane Valley exeettted—a—en-)o-}year
contracted with the District for continued service,for its residents. After the initial-year, Spokane
Valley-and-the.-Lii;Ir isticict agreed to a five year co ,ct for Iit raIry-sedges- eginniRg--in 2005,
E y-seven percent of voters approved onnexing-task-tnt a r�Q- n—In a May 2005 special
election, eighty-seven_percent of voters approved annexlnp bacV Into the District, with the
annexation effective January 1, 2006.
t.acIlity Planning
After I nseroeretie -the-L-hirer istrict and the City of Spokarm Vnlle tlabf3rated-en-develop-ing-e
mow-eaRkal-fasilitig&-plan for the District, In March 2004, the ap-itai-faeilitiei -plaRA+Rg-pfoser s
t ege -and a signIflea it amount of informal-ion-was-galhered,-i i
• Cornea ri BORB-with-libreFy-faoilit-les-in other similar sized Washlri-glen-cities
• Spokacie alle}Lda egra9h-irs
• Publie-lilcaf--faelllty atarar#s
a An analya]s of current-Salons-Valley a arilea
s-aFid,eens•ol yario is fanililu allerrretivea srrd
!bIis-R Eis afio-n
The Library District and-the- ity--of pokerta-Valle}-co ucted a randon-i-sample survey of Spokane
Valley residents•.In-Mar 4-and-April-ef 2001. The survey gat#Herat-i ifet atloe-oe-IralyeI-library.-uee,
satierfaertion-wi-th-lib-rary services and pfofcronees-regafding utur -tibraFy-se is
d--a-ep tmuAll pen-two y Wiled by 76 people, 76% of
which were-Cit -Fesidentte 1+1 - - e . _. .y _. - ._ -. i ith- aciIities-aril-$er,iige:
facility-tr ra ptioni #}rain ,1,IrbyrLle'eattoes-tf•a-n�I tb{ar -were Ian repll,aa e
s�rent Vall g-either--eri Js`or4 cite n41;e4h ra 11llnhnest to pay for new
l-ibraries.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4-Capital Facilities
Page 25 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
l eaeareh- eneluslorte
Analysis of in-FQrmation gathered loads to the conclusion that additional library spaca is--nom-te
set ae--apel ,e-Valiey-residents_ 1l-ts-else-deterrnined-t at tWing+ a^ K-any tirade it `isr 't
a-triable--allerRati4`$--T. mr"'rrunity-Inpu -sgawe4-x Eery-Iiigl7 level (98%) of overall--sa1ierfarAiGA
wt1,11-4ibr -secrises- d--a-hl --level of sa t tacll#les. The public identified-Ma
areas needing Improvement matcrials availability, wk --Feedires--a-larger-li-brary7-an b4lip
assays-sera ter-ava4iabillty, Only-a--medes -Interest In 41pcing;e;,--aG-ili(e YPEa-s-expreesed,
de vnsl 4iag-a-streag eed-far semm i1 ity education about future-library foclU4ies needs,
GO - 4.1-Weyf
spot rye-galley's Communi Pfefcrenac Survey
In +ed-a- questien Fes- to--gaga c ka.e-Valley
citizen's
satisfaction with current-Library services. i •
The e m Jorit of + +e es ldent -vJewed-librery
slaesr�4r�-- Pritiae4awith 8310--a#
, ^^G' „ts--; per#+lg that library services were _ �� •� ti,-
ten#= r?a ,L
Inventory of Existing Facilities
Valley has one library located inside its
boundary, the District's Valley Branch, located at 12004 East Main, This resource library is the
District's largest facility, measuring 22,. ` • i:.::_square feet, including br i icy: administrative space.
The District has two other libraries within the greater Valley area located at 4322 North Argonne
and 22324 East Wellesley in Otis Orchards.
As of May 4042010, approximately 36- 4433,004 Spokane Valley residents were Library District
cardholders. Valley Library was the primary branch of I VALLEY
registration, with Argonne second and Otis Orchards
third. Spokane County Library District has a
reciprocal li yysacdborrowing agreement with the
City of Spokane with over 1,500 Spokane Valley :.I-■rv.,byoine,�
residents ownirhaving _a Spokane rblis-Public z . ''s' '°°"
library Library card.
Library PacllltyJeler_PIart E,6t,nv
1q_M. rch 2008 voters defeated a proposal to establish
a proposed Greater Spokane Valley Library Capital F_acili#v Prea tc is_sue General Oblioation Bonds
for constructiort._4f..a new main library and a new neighborhood branch in the eastern area of the:
City. The District subsequently undertook a capital facilities planning process for its entire servic@
area, resultinn In the 'PA 2010 Board of Trustees ro l of a. O ear Library Facilities Master:
EaiJLE P},__ l in t 2031 population estimates based on Spokane County GMA population.
allocclions, the LIMP addresses current and future facility needs in each of its five pea rraphic
service areas: the Grea e .j k± : I- + h in h- . i i I , - `
and Moran/OierlraSe_j trip.
LIMP developrnent included community research (customer and community telephone surveys,
focus groups, and community leader interviews): oopyletLgn growth estimating by geographic area,
evaluations of existing faSilitla*_a_ d Aile.S: and a ok/blic input process. The plan proposes
mg/met or tbrae existing libraries with new facilities, the addition of three new branches. and
remodeling/expansion of five others a4a tot,al cosjof$50,8 million r201O dollars).
Level of Service
Tree-Spekano County Library Dis riot-hey ket-e&tablisher#e-I + seruise, The Libraryl ±11Sf .$
Master Plan establishes a Level or Service (LOS) of more feet pl r C/9124 for the overall
District with a Wm! 0.5 square Feet per capita within each of the five geographic regions served.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 26 of 71
l f
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Forecast of Future Needs
The Diskriet-i+ees- rget-Syekane ley-pepulatieff-of--1-D 000-feF-ils-ft a pFejesrtlens,,whieh--Is
senr,s.steriP,:ith--the-City of pet ere-!alley s--pof ulation-alle [ion-feF-gro tlw�+ithin-I ie xisl:ing-Gilt'
limits=-T9 Distriet ecognizes that a new-ibrary needs to be built inside Spokane Valley to provide
ads ate--library services. Future-facilities will be-dl skied between a main branch and a future
The LFMP uses a 2031 Spokane Valley population estimate of 108,000 for
jts future oroiections. consistent with lho-City L$ okerne VaPLev's GMA population allocation for
PECTithiNiltiin the exisling City limits. The District recognizes that new library facilities need to be
built inside Spokane Valley to provide adequate library services to its residents. Future facilities will
be divided between a main branch and two future neinIi crhood branches.
Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities
a-TS e-ae�FI ain--hransh--shooId--neesurap-aboLg-4.0 990--aqua{a-(set adequatal -eer a one-half 44 O 0 ople-The mein branch sli^ui4PT 'TVcated on an srteri8i Street Yyi hin +bout one-half Mile
of he-- (ague--cor idor between Dartrneuth and Sullivan Roads. A neighborhood--branch--o€
-approximately 15,900 square fect-se in epulativ+ -ef-20;Q9p-weuld-ideally-lae--looatedavil iin-two
le-three-miles of the n a--branch•. -jew main branch to replace the existing Spokane Valley
Library should contain about 50,000 square feet of space and should be located on an arterial
street within about one-half mile of the Sprague corridor between Dertmoulh and Everareen Roads.
To better mpg.the Ve.radaie end Greenacres areas, a new neighborhood branch of approximately
12,000 square feet should be built on District-owned property on Conklin Road. immediately south
of Sprague Avenue. A second new branch to serve the South �allev sjould be built between
Diehrnan-Mice and Evergreen Roads on or immediately south of 32 Avenue,
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
The future main branch is estimated to cost $1I.r415.55 million in 2904- 01Q dollars; the
neighborhood branch would cost about $3T155.1 million each. Vater-a revel-general obligati►
bonds are the-normal financing Fr tithed-fa--library-prejccts of lhls-ewe, Besides construction costs
and fees, the estimates include library materials, furnishings, and equipment. Voter-anoroved
ftenerlithigation bonds are the normal financing method for library projects of this size.
The District's Library Facilities Master Plan proposes a three phase capital improvement stiheduj
that indld .1211.aookeite V Jioy Dr.4ieots in the first two phases. The earliest feasible date for a
PI5_triet-wide bond election to carry out the proposed projects is early 2013, which for purposes of
the schedule is Year 1,
Phase1; Years 1 to 4
■ Corj tete property purchases (Year 1)
• Design, construct- and open replacement Spokane Valley branch (Years 1-4)
Phase 2: Years 3 to 8
• Dosicasmtuta, and open new Conklin Road branch (Years 3-5)
• _dell existing Spokane Valley branch (Year 5)
• Design, construct, and open new South Valley branch (Years 5-8)
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 27 of 71
i I.
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Dist Teri-p' +-th$4011;Wi ig na ilal Irn nrnveimell t-Ethed-6l
14o—may—ea—re
4—Determine-preferred-loeotions for new-lbI ie&
•—Develop-#EIr Zarb
P rchaea-lart #eF-B ier,
6-te-10-years
• Secure funding and purtha-se-eite(s--If-n #-alreaar1y cIone7
• Construct now main branch.
•-- ell-xisting elfey-b arl61
1-0-to 20 y i-1
• a061r 1ndIng and construct neigh Oerhood-branch.
1. Tahle-+442-Spak one-Cfkon#y-L-Ibraiey-0191Flel-Glx-year appal-Projeote-Find-FnonelIxg-PlaI
�_
rejeelt X608 2008 2008 2000 20.10 2011 :2O1.2 fetal
r¢9 Sp9kape lak6+ $100 81`50 $1,700 i $8.344 $&,7-54 0 0 640;049
Libras
Total $400 _I 5450 &1:700 8�3Dp $8460 0 0 : €407000
6O-Beftle j 5}04 5154 $1=744 S0,btk $:5: 60 0 0 4DG4X
I I I 1
T9tar $400 $1&0 .511740 $8x600 S0r754 1 0 U 40000
i I I f
AJ�enly-a1'-6eAeral-FLt rd-e�leslarr -In-2$96 3rid 20D7 ow rolrerkrree4le it rwetc r d iVreveel-Her+l 1w .
DI _ Snokano County.Library Dlstrlcl six yaw'Ca WWII Pro€acts and Fliiancina Plan
jAssurnos a 2013 bond Issua aut}roval�
pro ec 2011 241 u gsi 1$ /Gil ,2017 Total
New ra
y Dk ne Valley 0 0 I $1,2;50' 3 . $Q $7.38D 0 $16.810
1.l brary,
New C nkIln Rudd 0 0 0 Q 5204 .$2.450 $2,450 S5,10D
kjbrary
Noun S itly0PL 0 0. 6250' D Q o o S251�.
Total {1 o S1.500 SS900 $7.610. $ ,§.2.45Q 1,:10
_Revonua Sources
Disl:ict Fur•.u5 0 0 St.500 0 0 0 0
GO fends: 0 0 0 $30 57,590 SDA30 $2,4150 . ZM.
Total 0 0 $9,500 $80D $7.02 S$.834 $2.460 $..22.119
The€o eNoensee ere reiml]urs3bie frOrrt-_4!1:i_ S1{4'lp0g.0_1(y.0.0..
"The South Vf11r0y_Librar1&ck]u].oA i trachea,and auenLg I.:In 2019-2020.a:lisido the.Six Year Plan
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 28 of 71
{
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
The Library District will G9ntinue coordinate to work with the City of Spokane Valley to-further
develop--place a eHs;ftict new 11# cries- As-plans-afe dated-and•fef ed, this Capital-FaeiIdies
Plan-will-lie-amended to•incorporate-future--chaRgaa- in identifying-arid procurin_q building 51tes,
planr7 h i, ._cl ction, in carrying out design and construction of the new iibrarles. As
FMP is updated, this Capital Facilities Plan will be amended to incorporate future chancres.
Operational Costs
The Library District assumes that with efficient building design and continuing staff productivity
improvements, a larger Valley Library and an eventual new branch can be operated at normal
District funding levels of 50 cents per$1,000 of assessed valuation.
4.4.10 Parks and Recreation
Spokane Valley has a wide range of i ; ; p! ,
recreational opportunities available to residents ,:; r _ -
and visitors. City parks, school play fields, golf � M1�R•• '= '' 4 .; • ti
courses, trails, County parks and conservations .� •- ' '
areas are all within close vicinity to Spokane �,} µ
Valley residents. y • .; : ';° , "' •
th s a� I
The City provides a system of local parks that :°';. ..I
is managed by the Spokane Valley Parks and •- 3.7; r�� � "
Recreation Department. The Parks _ � -
Department is in the process of developing a — - -
new Parks, Recreation, and Open Spaces --
Master Plan. When finished, this plan will offer g
a detailed picture of the park, recreation and -""7
open space system, including changes and ..- 4
improvements that will be made in the future. - ---•-• •
This section of the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) provides summaries of the parks inventory, level of
service (LOS), future park needs, proposed projects, and a financing plan for the next six years.
Park Types
Parks are classified by their size, service area and function. Spokane Valley uses the nationally
recognized Park, Recreation, Open Space and Greenway Guidelines, to establish standard for
parks planning. Major classifications include mini-park, neighborhood, school-park, community,
large urban, various trail designations and special use facilities. The Parks Element, Chapter 9,
provides a thorough description of park types used for planning purposes.
Inventory of Existing Facilities
The Parks Map, found at the end of this Chapter, shows the location of all parks within Spokane
Valley. Table 4.13 provides an inventory of park and recreation facilities owned by Spokane Valley.
These parks are used to calculate Spokane Valley's level of service for parks. The Parks Master
Plan provides the most detailed inventory of parks, including equipment, structures and other
miscellaneous park facilities.
Table 4.13 Spokane Valley Park Facilities
Spokane Valley Parks Acreage Status
Neighborhood Parks
Balfour Park 2.86 Developed
-
Browns Park 8.03 Developed
Castle Park 2.71 M(nlmally Developed
Edgecliff Park 4.74 Developed
Adopted April 25,2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities
Page 29 of 71
•
I
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Level of Service
The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County requires all jurisdictions to adopt a level of
service (LOS) standard for parks. Spokane
Valley has the flexibility and freedom to adopt a ; E,t;
LOS standard for parks that reflects the s'�f'4�'ks
expressed need and desire of our community. ':•:,•,:•,;.• :?,
•
The National Recreation and Parks Association ,;•
suggest that cities adopt LOS standards for . i ) ; y
different park types, such as mini (pocket), „ y �:. :� + .•neighborhood, community and major parks. " � �. •.• rt-•.'•ir...r. ' ,
Spokane Valley does not have a well-developed `
park system and will use total City-owned park ,; .. ' '?• ,A •
acres for its LOS measurement. t
Spore-Valley currently awns 1 asp - ,I i,,,, - - -
develeped-and-um]eveleped--pads-land- t-lei g-#he * ..ti C .x J1
29At�+ 4ati of 85,010 people. the curcer t -*'# '•''. '' J
parks LOS is 1,92 acres of City park land—for --
every 100 idenfs= in 2006, Spokane Valley amts- opted a LOS of 1.92 acres/1000 people
as its minimum LOS standard—fef
7,1194 4 Stx kan4 li�1y PArks Loyal of SarviGo fads;as-sewn-is Table-144.
Spokane Valley recognizes that
6l -ewe schools, churches, natural areas and
Q006 opulatlon Pa Aer4e agel.af-Servic.c. commercial enterprises all provide
recreation opportunities for Spokane
Valley residents. These will all be
mac 454 1.0 2
�` taken into consideration when
I I Spokane Valley determines the best
location to purchase new park land.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Valley has the capacity to accommodate an additional 20- 616.493 people over the next
20 years within the current City limits. in order to maintain the current adopted LOS of 1.92
acres/1000 people, Spokane Valley would have to add about ,acres of park land over the next
20 years, with '.2 13.acres in the first six years, as shown in Table 4.15. The Parks Master Plan
provides a more detailed analysis of park and recreation needs by dividing the City into smaller
service areas.
Table 4.15 Future Park Demand
Year Population Total Park Acres Acres Required at 1.92 Net Deficiency Acres
Available acres/1000
20M011 1 aramoims ' 46317.2 45.3 M. 0-5
I2,1422017 I 92724393 M41 10172 17195 -14 j
202 02M 1 M5.570107.504 4.c ,fr$ — - 203 -40:21
*Assumes 20-year growth of 2-0,66616.493 people
Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities
In order to maintain the adopted 1.92 acres/1000 level of service standard, Spokane Valley #171;let
world need Lc add 42—i3 acres of park land by the year 20112017, In order to oddfees- bls
de€iciela^ ;ian-e-Va41e'"'I' p" 6o 20 acres of-park-l.and-wikkin-thc six ycor-4i!ne-ffeme-of-0-4s
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities
Page 31 of 71
f �
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Capital FaciIiE P4ar1;-r66kilti0g4141-s•+rpl i1 Tab'e '1.16. The Maxtor Plan
will be used.to.deter iFka4 be beet Ioc t—iell for 3r ^ I--aGO .;i1i-008-
Tai}loa#8-Parks- aRaaa#yE-Anaiysis
peprulaN$
'4 Totol--Pafk Aoro Ro uI e
df Aefea at--4192 Nat-Rase ro-4o-ra
Aval Is Wu eerosJ4000
2000 X10 433 S83 0
--- 202 02,2,13 X83' 177 6
a #e5-ot kland wila Iku purciras• d 4w.lkiin 11.r44-5-143a FE-424-plan
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
The following table details Spokane Valley's six year Parks and Recreation capital improvement
financing plan. The table details projects that address level of service deficiencies (capacity
projects) and other capital improvements (non-capacity) projects.
M atoE-Arnow's-In$11000
PfeJoot 2006 2007 2048 2000 ; 2040 20 I 204-2 1-o1$I
f"arkl+flu:AVltllsil∎on (20 4,9a0 517000
Amu Gapac41y)
_ _ I
Pa rt#Imprarenienla 299 000 500 599 b8A 440 36o frao-a9
SWVi lgil -P66FHpg1&Uee 4,000 $47500
Te4a1 47308 2%660 609 500 . 669 400 209 5577-20
Ra entre`Seurse
c;PReFal-PAREI 4400 000 4-1404]
450 499 400 409 44)f) 200 34;850
Q.0 -144-1
•
X16 2C10 4-00 4$9 489 $w6D
•
Telai 1-399 2,050 000 600 5130 40:.1 ,56%7Aa
T�121e 4.17 Parke Canitai FRC111IIari Plan
Hots:Amounts in QQQ
protkoi Q011 202 A013 p014 2015 ; 2096 • otat
Park Improvenier ; 1 70,E j :mg too 1Jo 10e $2,559
Swlmmirm Pool Upgrades
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 32 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Table.4.17 Parts CRp3tal Facllltlas Part
Hats:Arr1ouRts_in 1.4/Q9
Total 1.059 ibG • 900 100 100 100 100 $2,5.54
ftoYaRlLra Source.
General Fund "059 ,": E() ran ,Q Q $2,258
RPET 50 tQ fig fait
Grants r o I
Total 19059 Wa ¢ ioo k00 100
4.4.11 Public Safety
The Spokane Valley Police Department is a contract law enforcement agency, partnering with the
Spokane County Sheriff's Department to provide a safe environment for the citizens, businesses,
and visitors of the City of Spokane Valley. This unique contracting relationship allows for the
sharing of many of our resources, allowing both agencies to operate at peak efficiency without
duplicating services.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities
Page 33 of 71
{ I
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Spokane Valley also contracts with Spokane County for judicial, jail and animal control services.
The total contract for public safety for 2CC.6 2911 _totaled over $r€- 515.3 million, including
approximately 100_commissioned police officers.
Spokane Valley supports community oriented policing and recognizes it as an important
complement to traditional law enforcement. In Spokane County, community policing is known as
S.C.O.P.E., or Sheriff Community Oriented Policing Effort. The community policing model balances
reactive responses to calls for service with proactive problem-solving centered on the causes of
crime and disorder. Community policing requires police and citizens to join together as partners in
the course of both identifying and effectively addressing these issues. About 364 Spokane Valley
citizens are S.C.O.P.E volunteers.
Community Survey
The Community Preference Survey included questions to gauge the public's perception of police
services. Results show that 85% of Spokane Valley residents believe police services are good,
very good, or excellent, indicating a generally high level of confidence in the police force. Only 27%
of respondents expressed a willingness to pay additional taxes to have improved police services.
Inventory of Existing Facilities
The Spokane Valley Police Precinct is located at 12710 E. Sprague and houses patrol and
detective divisions, the traffic unit and administrative staff. The Precinct also includes a—prperty
storage`facriJity•anu-a Spokane County District Court.
Spokane Valley is served by fi�+ -four S.C.O.P.E. stations, shown in the following table.
— Fa#F0-4,18-51101t090-$fAFley-S:G, Este#€one
e 1 efheed I tee$1iert -- - Nel$hborheara 1.4a At€ola
Wesi-Volley moziiopiri Agjorrne cenk agcl. j 2400 N.Wilk 9
I�r 6 -
ilMeelty .1O21.Ea 1.4§u' Gents P-V ley -I 1-1§-14.-Evapweer-R _
algeolff East 0.0.3" ;3rd- 2
Talala 4,1B Snotrs.ne Vatte+ ,S-0,P-ESlAttart$
f101(31lhor€a.va4 Coat€On figluhbolhaoc 1-ocallvR
1Jniversi1V in37.1 Fast 5 yren€woOd. 24 30 N.Wilbur#79
Ed9 .lift 522 S Tt°err'lan F .1 1:141a Valtey $15 N.Evesween Rd.
1
Level of Service
Public safety is a priority for the City of Spokane Valley. It is difficult to determine at this time, an
adequate and measurable level of police protection. Spokane Valley will monitor the performance
of the Spokane County Sheriff's Department and will adjust the contract for services as necessary
to ensure an adequate level of police protection.
Forecast of Future Needs
Future needs for police protection will be determined as a part of the annual budget process.
Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities
Spokane Valley is not planning to construct any new law enforcement facilities at this time.
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
Spokane Valley is not planning to construct any new law enforcement facilities at this time.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 34 of 71
� l
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
In 1988, the intergovernmental agency known as the Spokane Regional Solid Waste System
(System) was formed by interlocal agreement between the City of Spokane, Spokane County and
all other cities and towns within the County. The System is responsible for implementing solid
waste management plans, planning and developing specific waste management programs and
updating solid waste plans for the entire County. The System is managed by the City of Spokane,
which uses its structure to carry out the various solid waste management programs for our region.
In Spokane Valley, solid waste services are provided by private haulers licensed by the Washington
Utility and Transportation Commission (W.U.T.C.) through franchise agreements. Waste
Management of Spokane provides residential and commercial garbage services and weekly
curbside recycling collection; Sunshine Disposal provides only commercial services. At this time,
Spokane Valley residents are allowed to self-haul their garbage to an appropriate dumping site.
Inventory of Existing Facilities
The Regional Solid Waste System includes a Waste to Energy facility located at 2900 South
Geiger, and two recycling/transfer stations. One of the stations is located within Spokane Valley at
3941 N. Sullivan Road south of Trent and across from the Spokane Industrial Park; the other is
located in north Spokane County at the intersection of Elk-Chattaroy Road and Highway 2.
Landfills are necessary to provide disposal for solid waste that cannot be recycled or incinerated, or
that exceeds the capacity of the WTE Facility. The Spokane County Regional Health District
licenses six privately owned landfills in Spokane County.
Level of Service
The minimum Regional Level of Service Standards requires solid waste services to meet all State
and Federal regulations.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Valley is participating on the update of the Spokane County Waste Management Plan
(SCWMP). The SCWMP update process will determine future needs for solid waste disposal.
Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities
The updated Spokane County Solid Waste Management Plan will provide information on future
regional solid waste facilities.
Finance Plan
The updated Spokane County Solid Waste Management plan will include a financing plan for future
regional solid waste facilities.
4.4.15 Stormwater Facilities
Stormwater runoff in Spokane Valley flows to a combination of public and private facilities. In
developed areas, runoff MUM into the ground or flows dawn-street-k►Ixe&-ancl-wed
t1 to drywells in public road rights-of-way, drywells on private property and grassy swales with
overflow drywells in easements on private property.
There are advantages and disadvantages to relying on on-site facilities for all stormwater
management. One advantage is that on-site facilities are typically constructed with private funds
and can be integrated into the development as a green space amenity. However, on-site facilities
are sometimes not well maintained. Their capacity may be diminished over time or they may fail
entirely during large runoff events. On-site facilities may take up large portions of a development
site, thereby reducing the effective density that can be accommodated in that area.
In 2004, the Spokane Valley City Council created a stormwater utility to develop and maintain storm
drainage systems on City owned pelsie-land. To create revenues for the stormwater utility
operations, the Council adopted an annual fee per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU). Residential
ERUs are based on the number of single-family dwellings, while Commercial ERUs are based on
the square footage of impervious surface associated with a business or commercial development.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities
Page 47 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Inventory of Existing Facilities
Spokane Valley's inventory of stormwater facilities, most of which are integral to the safe function of
our street system, consists of about ti.,130G7,200 drywells, 42-6-1909 bid-Infiltrate swales, I
detention ponds, and one retention pond. Other facilities include curb inlets, bridge drains, and
culverts, all of which require monitoring and maintenance. The retention pond, located at Dishman-
Mica Road. and 32nd Ave., was constructed as a part of a road project and provides a disposal point
for water flowing from Chester Creek. The inventory does not reflect storm eater structures located
pn privele properties that do not serve the oubllc street drainage system.
Level of Service
The Spokane County Board of Commissioners adopted new regional level of service standards for
stormwater in 2004 as a part of the Countywide Planning Policies update_;
''Flooding of properly outside designated drainage-ways, defaa'to drainage-woysa
rcygment5. _flood ,force_, r approved drainage facilities, during the design
precipitation or rime event pre.scrdked in the standards of the governing local
agency or f w'lsdlall s J r e • . .•1,..0 •, ,..i•f prQbabllify afforded
b such sr nd rt fin may • 1. 4 . 41 L /n • , rr �fc rr_ ,�rafr' a}'ided io
to maximum extent practicable kv evalurrtlarg tTt (feces of a}0 year rain everd,
and impierrrenriug measures to ensure _that the r•It_n O'attendant to such event is
lirecled away fi•orrr such buifdings and accessory . trrtelrrr es. f4n rrrtxrafer
discharge to sit e_ or ground waters rrrrist meet federal. state and local
regrri{'grrtenls for hater quality treatment. storrrr}r'ater rrrraojiand infiltration."
The standards reflect current best practices that are established in adopted stormwater design
guidelines. Spokane Valley follows said guidelines in reviewing and approving new development
and is therefore in compliance with the regional LOS standards for stormwater runoff.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Valley will continue to use private, on-site treatment facilities for new development and will
install drywells, swales and other facilities as needed for new street improvement projects.
Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities
Location and capacities of future facilities is dependent on the location and size of new
development, future public street projects, and projects that will address current problem areas
within the City. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will incorporate capital programming
for stormwater facilities.
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
The City currently charges a 2CS1 annual stormwater utility fee per Equivalent Residential Unit
(ERU) to generate revenues for stormwater facility engineering, maintenance and administration.
The stormwater fee is expected to generate ZAT2.$1 8 million annually.
Transportation Facilities
Inventory of Existing Facilities
This section of the Capital Facilities Plan includes transportation facilities within Spokane Valley,
including streets, bridges, pathways and sidewalks. Street maintenance is not included as a part of
the Capital Facilities Plan.
Spokane Valley is responsible for about 455 miles of public roads, including 51 miles of Urban
Principal Arterials, 61 miles of Urban Minor Arterials, 44 miles of Urban Collectors, and 298.85
miles of Local Access Streets. Table 4.36 provides a list of all arterial intersections within Spokane
Valley.
Adopted April 25, 2006(Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 48 of 71
I
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Funding for the operation and expansion of the City's transportation system falls into several
categories, which include federal, state and city funds. Some sources consist of reliable annual
funds while others are periodic, such as grants. The use availability and applicability of these
various sources are not always at the discretion of the City. Spokane Valley will develop a track
record with funding agencies as time goes on, which will help make to make more reliable funding
assumptions.
A summary of expected federal, state and local funding sources for the City's six year Capital
Improvement Program is shown in Table 4.39. The following is a summary of transportation
funding options.
Federal Assistance
These funds are authorized under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
Act for the 21gr Century (SAFETEA-21) and are administered by the Federal Highway
Administration through Washington State Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan
Planning Organization (Spokane Regional Transportation Council), Federal funding programs
include Bridge Replacement (BR), Congestion Management and Air Quality (CMAQ) and the
Surface Transportation Program (STP).
State Assistance
The Washington State Transportation Improvement Board administers State transportation
programs, including the Urban Corridor Program (UCP), the Urban Arterial Program (UAP), and the
Sidewalk Program (SP).
City Funds
Spokane Valley contributes revenues from the General Fund and the Real Estate Excise Tax funds
for transportation projects. The City also receives State Motor Fuel Tax and Restricted State Fuel
Tax.
Taiale-4,M—S1 Year nspe-rtation Capital Facilities and Flnanoing Plan
.2010
(dollars In thot4sands
II?rrl} Prejeal-I:esoFipHon Primary Gity . el• l
_-4 - Saurae Amount Arrtaaonl —
4- BaFt4e 440,9 _ $FF —moo 417
2 . Bra P400T�, ;or SAP —69 d
Park Rind #2(PE-Only)--6roadwayda4H4iaaak STR4614 —2 —246
4 oarirwa v nki -&af9 RF f ecl-PiraeRISR-: -10.1a8Fk OAP P �a 3
5 i isca weF errslon 3.13D9'o&e-Sulllvv►t CIO t4 Ml6•51.11- :e tterP -264 1,974
8 00Ae•ROWI---184 to Trani _ GM Q 77 I —244
Igliatgulth a ocfion FCC SETA —2 3$
8 India TA 276 1142
a I Se lliven- #F -oniy}--ErAlki-lo-Wellesley ST F} —1-4Q 299
40 Suflvanr€Iffepo-InIcr96916944-P66 City — 1;33 1,879
.11 Plv moRC-pdaflagemBrit-Rrograrn-- Afterials 91per--1-ed —_ 000 00
1-2 PaVeFneRt lagemeflt-RAVElrrl--bocal-A s Gity - 2,090 2,000
STEP P ve sk Gd4y 42 i
20.14 Totals; --MOO --2x0493
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 61 of 71
i
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
I Table 4.3U $)x-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Ffnanclna Per
?411
fclollars jamsalugli
Prolool Descikotlon Primary CAM L 1
ter, Source _( ypt Amount
1 Park Road- 2 fPE Qnfy1-fro ivay to Indiana,_ _S PfLP 5 35
2 Indiana Ave Extension-3600r We Sullivan Rd to follsslon&Flora LlgE 53 375_
agipnnie f aatl IaD to trenl. — 713
4 fndlanalulllvan InlerseGion PCC: , _ 2.42. . 1 ]$_
J_P;,_s ali rli :. st L P l 2ag _ 21e 1,6Ox_
s 139r er d fSNSF Grade Sew rallan tP Only) QIher Fed o
7 Broadway 632.4ritonne/MO lan Irtitersaalfons PCC(JEIRW Only STP(LJl - 37 271
$ Mission Ave,-Flora to Barker(PER Only LI) _-6fi .455_
IP v M n m Pr r I S Omer Fed 2.004 _4.000
J a nt Mara emenr Pr r m-Lo aI Access C 2 000 2 040
k_ — '
12 Sullivan ir Puc1ld PCC Inflersaction iPFYI iArONMJ S'r 163
I3 Sullivan Was!Bridge
2011 rot s; 6.351 14.040
TaIik -413 - - - • - , . . - , •
2044
oII r h ds}
!tog'. PraJest-De li R Prlmayf City ;alai
4 - SOurse Amedpl AFReorit
6 krgon Rood---109-te TxeRtr Cfa4AQ 101 713
.SkrINM .. eekeY S ) —40 ZOB
44 R '.'agiall44arlatiemerd Pro,,ra.,, n.tefi,s O9pef-Fed C DDD
_# men4Ma-a-agemaat-Rregrac—L►sal Access _ Clly 000 2,000
43 &T' -P6wreba+]ii Clti+ T 57 —7-6.7
44 149et Corrc.i..,iT2, Elimue40--Tiord OMAQ --210 2.061
4-6 lull- -- QI —747 36
4-6 bAlsaieR-Aver—Fteta-te-Barker 3TP{4.4} 1
elals� , x 11,631
Table 4.3.8 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan
2012
dollars in thousands
Itcni Proiisct Doscrfrlian Oily Lola]
+:n •m. n
6 hirlIMIMPLIM ra'a 'clam L!j I Other Fad 0 2 10
P-v=m=n M-L =sue PI!ra — •r(vials w h rl=-d ENITMIRPIrAii
P:...r1' w 'rte: •La :I i;cesS 5+ 200+ 2011
J r
Broadwa Ave Extension-•Flora a Barker PE OnI 265 Mai
111,16M2MMIENIMI,kM11AVIMITEITIE4SINAPPIMPIEWEIMMI
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 62 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
17 _.. t-.&Sullivan Signal_ _Jr; --G2 250
....'.n .,_'r-!,o, 7..0 -1 I.9r 4 eltesl4 STS P(Ml ZIN
rolve€:It Rdii-9 IV'r..- $ {l l , 34 251)
+:�• . [ /r+anneNullart Intorsactlons PCC(CH Wills( ja_ 78O 2.075
Sullivan t u rlti f' _In� +SEior?LGN_onl] _�P(tJ3 1 i 1.7�F3
IIIII _
_ . _6•3 16,iTo
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities
Page 63 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Table-43#1.Six-YearTrarisport tIon- ayltaf-Fasflitte-s-arid aflsing-Ran
2012
( iGliar n-t o les )
litli, 124ojvwl oeesr;pllan• 4:441.1aPt Gity T-44.4I
- &wpm ArflE0101 a4Fr e•Le4t
1-1 RaverileNI-Nlelieg914181 e5F6r#I—AF1erl31G Qtbec-I=a4 X909 X990
13 PI F ,!aI Wane ;o °'agrim Lanai Accesc •145± - 2.000 1009
-1 llNan-FteH4Wesl-6ilelt ii* —44x —735
16 Miseloa,Ave-•-Wer.ale-Barkef TP( ) - •.67-1 --4,867
_14 Par Read-, (Gi4-Only}-Bwsdway-te-ladiana _ 3 I,011
46 .gawdI Ii R ad-32ndowwli {U 1 ie 652
- - 204-24-041 •4 —671.66 —141-H 4.6
T1 0-44Z$- ix-YearTransportation Capital Facilities_artd nn FCnanci Plan
013 -- -�
dollars in thousands
-
iLem lapiec Description Prim .::$y MO
ar _ louvre Ai • J1 81 n i 9
9 P vemenl Manager tent Progreni-Arleriais Other Fe0 2 iii 4 m 4l
10 Pavemen M. -.•in•n Pri.r.r,r-t. i I •cress City 000 2000
il 'Avers Road West B l e # 0
6raad r�av 1V tiF24 .iqp More to E arker(PE On t+f] CI Igg
El Everif •r�132r3i `1: , .or. .v- ,r-ento SZ-27,f:E;)r.lyl Ci y 312 Mari
k • - :r,:. ,i: . r,.:.t. STPU 540 4000
Wil Missloo Ave.-Flora(o Barker(C N 9r1Iy) - ,.-Pl4l _536 EMI
- _ r_ 13 Totals: 6,853 15.314
FEa4i011 ital-kkeilltieS-a d•F#nal'ci' g•Pia ►
2013
{do Iar i.. tL.o..t .iu s3
Pr-Goo-Dewrioefi Pstnaepir City Thal
- ScH.K.Ge Amaaat _ APA9krht _
.14 Pevemaal-Man eraaniProgram Merials. Qt4crFel —ooa —47090-
I MoriF flentizrograrn-te0al ,aess _ 09 2.909
4.5 ride. 6R X300 X09
- Park•lioa W-Cri r taFaa • }_ 1 —99 —33-7G4
44 Reedrid-tr- tla STP(U) —g9 fit*
4-9 .1 Rea Br7d I altey1-$N6F-6Fede-SepF*Falio' G 1pet-Fed L. 50
?.{1 o StUk2 IS44.Ners>r 4 a�4 4 944k6'p@f6
2013 Totaled --87.994 17,422
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities
Page 64 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
I b.Is .4.3.B. Ix-Yt ar Transportation Capital Facilities and FEnancingl Plan
2014
irirs In thottsa s
lezo eigt oescri ari Primary City. Total
At _ Source Amount n n
9 P vemarl!kianaaement Program-atte-11 mgr Fed 2.044 4,000
IQ paverrrad Markagerrtrnt Program•Local A4cess _.9.11.Y.- • 2 Q1Q 2.000
_ u111 _. 0 9
3 9-r it -.-. - _ ` 1- . A.. -w. P in' ) ScIIY Z.,U
?4. powdash Road-321-d 10 8'"{PE Only) STPfl.1i _ $4.
— r• ; ...tir. _`_... .._.. -1--+i- i, . . . . • 1 AO IS9 IDa
Flora Road-amiguojsaiiisslon(PE Oniyi G11v 219 216
7 ammo_ $TP(_E) 45. 330
�'~'r -" 8-6Mx-Y rar Transk ortation- apltai-Fas saes-and-Rin- nsin nr
201-4
_ {clollra ills tlousanJs}
Ilea RroJarA aeeApllen I Rd-Rtiapy 144-ty 0611
-# • I Siuree ACI.KHAPII Aredril
1.1. Reveille*.Pitenagement•Rfograrn--Arleriala- 1 OlherFrrd X000 —170O _
' Rweiment Ha io l-Fti- ar3n--I ;^ . .Olty •--x-000_ - 900_
1 tai X2.4.41 61.44 R2. laR 1.AO 4
' -}$ Bowellelo-Road--•32nd-to-801 .STP(Lf) 1.061 7,762
— I Toad--Pr♦a lri Lh t'alIoy�e� ocaUe _GI0lo�ed. -._-- 1 _-2-140
_31- r iia4-Bar er a(fis S- nab _OeveIepoio _ 76
I - - 2444J{al5; —6745£+ 22.607
L Table 4.38 Six-Y ilr]r tnsportation Capital Facilities and FEnanoinnl Plan
015
S
lign Pro led.Desrditl oa • Primary City Total
-V _ _ _Sourct Ain n Amount
2 pavement Maimernerrj,bagram-Arteri91 LF..ell . 2,000_ 4,000
—
10 Nome nt M anaaemenl Program-Local Access _..Qi c 2.Q00 _x,000
1_3 Sulliwen Raad Weal Bridge BR 0 - 6.+740_
_. ___Ipa r ft - h s In nl ?36 236
24 :.li .I:r :..i - d • : ' P- ,, STPU1 .a. 20.4
, 25 Broadway Ave. Extarrsfon—I1 ra to Barker IR fCN On tom_ iQ AQ,Q
28 plor_a Road•-Sprague to MIssion(P1 Q(i_1 t _MIL 216 . 216
a 6tdt walk Infill Program SINE) ;G 270
28 Riramrean lTS imorovcmants CMAQ
DealPAeli+ 2nd• 16th to 32nd,Evergreen ld SR•27
29 (RWICN Only) STPa.t) 64 _ 404
20 jalp.V1. 4,711, 16.572
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities
Page 65 of 71
f l
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Table- ,38- i;Ic-Y-eaTr-anspeFtatiGI pf tai--Fae}I#ties-a - 1+1ane}hg Piei
{dellar-6-1-n-t-h-em-sand )
I X4 I P-F I Fy cr Talrl
E •
$g gg P�r71eiin Amami
44 Pave at-ImAHaoErp FlFRF9fl —.n•i ag Other FdEI 9 DO
=1-2 Ravermpat-A4aF r Rfegr im L ct ni e.......... GP4t? _ 9 , - 99
4-$ F Pk-ROMP-6ridg14-1.1:16-Valley Grade-Saparalion Oilier-FPd --2813 _$0o9
_ 24 Spragg9-1-1 14er rPe- ig I _Bava7e a. -74 X370
22 Applewaa-E t€I lDn_- URlva^°lI E er raen SIP - 4 -�2O
_.a S rI w_ --- pp[ewm,G-te-Eread ner LAP -62 260
_ 24 1aaGfie:4-gde+}SI^^ ° IT} 49 f{ aM-ef•Mouk-Rd 4JAP .33 357
26 S41lliva^Ft ad i .V44- i oalk_E did le-Wa1k _ iqL -64 -400
a stAilvaA-R d-NeFah-E-Ktensierw{ elew lch) Gliy -66 -66
2-7 Trani t,�ro, nO l-rR. o e o r r Ti rr L. DevelUp r& 133 632
8 Parkdi-SpFagg-o-Ir eFaesNeF G _; P#P9, 1-9 -136_
29 Sd 1lven-RcNTS-Broadway-Ie-24ila GMAQ Fig x 108
3.0 Gity 4€�^"rT Imigevema'A66 _GMA9 -0-Q5 D
31- -Eyi r rc. 2-1 STP m • •164 - 1.315
- 2016 Totals; 6 6.
Table 4.38 Six-Year Tronsporgatlorl Ctal�ita.I Facllki9s avid FinancinfPian
,2016
higilars In thousand
19A1 ProlecUaluiplicn I Primary. City Totel
_4 Bourns Pr7wm1 Arn0u11
1 Pavomen na enlenlProgr rp _Arterials Other Fed . 2.000 4.ODU
_ig aveanent Mana ari eri PragFam Lo i1 Acces __cat 2-00Q 2,044
f7, EiroadewAye. Extension-Flora to Barker(RWIGN Only) h,OCi;r_
27 Sidewalk Will Proeramj STP{E1 _ 162; f,20Q
_2a Evertveen ITS Impr 1�w _ 73 592
.Evero5 r►r32nd-16th to 32n1.Evergreen io SR-27
243 1.i1vs9c),i or - STPlUU Pi47 4,701-
Aunlewiay Er4ension-Unlvers lLy_Wigrareerr _.11.2 112 $$2_
3j _Gr ri8C1 ..7rail Plannlnsr Study{Sullivan Rd.to Ll erI r L�kei TP(f ti
32 4lansfie Utenslan-P irleatSR27}tg 30a fLL t Of Houki CI iY 136 I 136
Lid yillwood Urban Trail• Fanoher Rd.to Eyergr er1 I#d. TP(E1 22 439
Park Rif J BNSF Gretle Sa aaratlon O!rier cL 31 750
85 Srilltra�Rd ITS.Bro dtiway1 4 QMAQ 183 1,35G
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 - Capital Facilities
Page 66 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
_J
'Fable 4,3B-Slx-YeUTrnnsparialfon-Improvement rogfam-Sumniaq�701Whroegf 13{in4.10001
Seti red.Profeale Naniwd-Rr&FG s Totals
Ye4 Federal stake oih€r Tigal 1.154.ecal .;tale 9th€- gLy Taal F 9aal Stale Q11:ef Q Telat
MO SOW $3824 RAM. $2,164 -0450 52,440 $4 b0 $7.;-543 .$91.43 54,063 Ran $2,905 ss4744 520,43,
204 42671 $0 $4 $424. 54,092 R.A..0 a a 5412 $944 56,4810 S4 a 561.464 $11.633
SO SO $4 $9 $0 APO $0 &144348 54310 $0 S0, S 51IAN
204a SO SO $O SO $1-43 S8 5 994 $17.421 S-1-1 1 $318 $2;x3 1 ;<17,972
2#i SO SO $0 S.1447-6 $$41 $.164 X4€8 $72,507 SI4 46 S4a-1 4164 8 $FOR
NI45 SD $D SO $O 8.477 $3;189 S-1,1345 $.5724-1 S x142' Rl2-07.7 $3384 $02.5 $5,211 $18;142
A 4 WAG. tIpa.i. # $11.44% 4.4.144.11 1r 14 sa ax 1 I 0.4.-.1.9.4 F ,44 8 a 8av a 1145.
Tab'e4.39 5ix.Yea'Irr^spertd11.0n In4provena91 Program Summary 2011 kh row h2.316 $1.000}
_f Secured Pr teats Froleclg
Plinnag to g
F�de!$J 21gb cedlik !g t 1-0101 F$der41 State other Taal Federal ;Pala Other cl�r Told
52,632 $LQ4z ;749 $4,870 P4,339 1134 $4$02 59,170 $7,171 $418 X1,102 $5.351 $14,040
I . §4 69,9+46 6287 $371 :5.254 315.744 510.218 $287 6373 $3,342 $16,470
1221 : a507 .$154 a $3.653 315.314 $9,507 $154 $¢ $5.65s st5,314
a $9.368 $2,098 54,649 515,106 $4.359 52.086 54,549 516,10
1211 $0 I. $9,773 $2488 ;34,711 ;$16,572 59-773 $2,086 4 54,711 $16,572
Qf¢ $2 0 10 g _$10,057` Via 15 7 :6264_518932 r EKSE a5L4 LE =LAM_
9_$32
Agg. Oa ' $ ¢5,360. $ X53 gia4 55 X095 a i,sz=saw_
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 67 of 71
l
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
L l ' Trains ortntleh-lrroppavaraen earn-204 hroug -2 r I�rr ,00 }
Rrejeots wit4ae4rE L-evert-Match t hlr+- stim or.et!roes
Profeoi-Narrro Projeot-Dese tl n TataI Cost
-14 Ever l{een-te r a ond-w lo --le-t1Rroc larres-4wi[h
Beet etrrfae-and sk4ewall 272,37,419_
8111-Avee e-PIas^e - r ehan F rsh 8th Ave. to a theta Ian¢soction
to-Have fe i,,•"l -oc dieFreld walksr8p lke-la-nos. 3-9, 00
Bth- -ni.e Phase 2 P r to e enstruct th-Ana eectIo
l3iskey with-c ttar idewelks-and-ib ke-ISM X00
NI-Avenue Phase 3 Dickey to Resenstruel:-804-Av t -s lhrse-lags-eeclien
GeFnekan - with curb, ciuttor, sidealvaIke-o d-bike-lanes 4467,00
[Appleway-E4andan—Doenyoen Extond A leway kd--rruilp -multi-lane
# aairley #shitty-kaslkrElirg-sr s sid walksr
wat.. r.l tt a lane rnr rF.i.3y t'/r ntr r
1 ss 4aoprerektev+a t grind
Darker lead-SEl te-Applewway at 6-4440
Har-k,^-r; &-- pokane Pit, r to
Trent Reconstruct to-a-2 lane cufhec#-rterlal 1 09
8keedway- ArgeaneiMullan
Inlerseetions PCC -i iler5estiens in PCC 1 556-0t;
8r ReeenetfeeHe -ientm Flora le Bad 0782400
Cr.rrtah,n Truot. I n 8 h to
Add-SB-# sic-L-ane-to-road €44 0
Eucliei-Avo1 Fleia•Rd=Fler,s
Euclid to Euclid, Eusilil-Flere-to
aerker ertMlal 6.1409.00
Won R^ =- raque-to-Miasiea I I ens nict-&- idgri-lo-3-lane-re' d way 9
kiefeen--&-Sullivan PCC. Rresepslr lnieFsastIon-in-P 1.360,00
Park-Road-#.3_S ague IC, Recer}stfst-oncJ . en-o-a ataalr res-
Braa-reams d-eid•ewelk _ 4-24440
Roer Carrlr i r rirtsegmn in
. Tra ills- igaa�-CeAtrel-€ esr # rrs-for Corridor X90_
Infer-overnents-#o.Inlersastlen(Dual lane
_8ROWinaara6th Int y ecHnn Roundabout) 0
kIniverslly4Firag..e lnt rsec!ion lace-racp1 alt-psvement-with-pc-Alend
PCG - COFREHA-OEFRsrele` averrmeal, 1,$.12,00_
TOTA L -
_ 1 , !0_
Table 4.40 Six Year Trensoorlatlnn fine rovemen_Pro ciranr 2010 Thratiah 2016 stn S1.OUry1
-r. ; swithout Local r.latc . 1 ri plc !I ! -acetates_
_FroFect U4me_ I.: P!: g i t Total Cos
2nd Avenue- Evergreen 12 Reconstruct and Idea to three I-nes with --
n r= ,ii _ .- l el s. 2.231,00
•
zl i Avenue'Phase Ai-Cori open Reoonstrucl t fri Ave.to a three-bane section
to lily I i .t= =`i, -I s e d bike lanes. X483.tlI
D h Avenue Phase 2-Park i i=Rr 1: 1.{ ±a ` =.tae three-lane section
D ,..: l I.A..r_Ir[!r!EIca0E=131=Heber'1-rtt+#!il1(: 5 120.1,I
Dth Avenue Phase 3-Dickey to Hoconatruct 8Ih Ave. to-a-three-lane section
C: 1=I. wih llli r 4= . I.=11E,lks =lr alike lanes. 4867-11*I
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 68 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Aarsleway xtnslon-Evergreen fiend Aoolewav_61+!(_with a multi-lane
.o Tshlrl4v 'I bs and sidewalks. 211 I
aasignstruot to 3-lane roadway
j:urn lOrg, alks,. rb a !utter and
L3•L= ka_a =8th toAl..lewa :11 i = 4=r 7 1�
B2gr Road-Spokane River to
'1`ra# Re_ = r 1= .,Lied arterla! 6. `=1-1 e..
Etro&dw onnel'Mu11art
Intersecital= _Reconstruct inte(s r' n r E .0 1 556.00
.4 a A : - Flora i B: t-r ;: •t• .>!_ to 3-lane Flora to Barker : •1
Carnahan Truck Lane- i
.1* x ick Lane to road .
Euclid Mat Fora.,13ijjaa
Euclid to Euchhci Euclid Flora to Rec?onstruct to provlcfp a 2.lane.
= 1
F
It: i I,• 4 a tt ue to(Mission Reconstruct&widen tpi]?n a roadway
Kiernan& PCC Reco struct rntersection In PCC 1 WOW
Park Road-# -Snraaue tQ Reconstruct and wid8I to a Stand tt]re _:
r roadwa 1.1; ..x: eet with curbs and sI wa1 4.244.00
Ines Corrido.rJTS:Sprasiue to
16�Ft Traffic Sl'n:I Can 1F = 4=, + *if** 765.00
Improvements tp intersection fl]ual lane
SR27IPi =-11 r 4- ." ion Roundabout) 3 185.00
UniversJty/SorKlue Intersection Replace asphalt pavement with ogrtland
FCC cement concrete .a - t:11 .l 642.00
TOTAL _ 76_877:06
Potential Annexation Areas/Urban Services
The Growth Management Act requires that counties designate urban growth areas (UGAs). The City of
Spokane Valley identified lands adjacent to the City within existing UGAs that would likely be developed
for urban uses and potentially be annexed to the City. In order to assess the need for capital facilities, the
City has identified existing service providers within the Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). This
assessment should help identify the effects a potential annexation area will have on existing levels of
service.
Table 4.41 Existing Urban Service Providers within Potential Annexation Areas(PAAs)
PAAs Northwood Northeast East Southeast South Ponderosa Edgecliff
Domestic Water Pasadena Park Consolidated Consolidated Vera Vera S.C.W.D.No.3 East Spokane
Hutton Settlement Consolidated S.C.W.D.No.3
Fire&Emergency Services F.D.No.1&9 F.D.No.1 F.D.No.1 F.D.No.I&8 F.D.No.1&8 F.D.No.8 F.D.No.1&8
Law Enforcement Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County
Libraries S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library Dist. S.C.Library Dist S.C.Library DIsL
Parks&Open Space Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County
Public Schools W.V.S.D.&S.D.81 E.V.S.D C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. W.V.S.D.&S.D.81
Public Transit Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available
Sanitary Sewer Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Not Sewered Spokane County
Solid WastelRecycIe Waste MgmL Waste MgmL Waste MgmL Waste Mgmt Waste Mgmt Waste MgmL Waste MgmL
Storm water Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County
Street Cleaning Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County
•
Transportation Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County I
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 69 of 71
Comprehensive Plan Map
0
a
CPA-01-11
Spra_ue \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Fr r
r7r
NN
2nd
2nd
CPA-01-11 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map
City of Spokane Valley designation from MUA to NCT; subsequent zoning
Community Development Department change from MUA to NCT.
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
quality of water runoff. Furthermore, development of a wellhead protection program with the
various water providers should provide guidelines to avoid possible contamination.
Policies contained in the Natural Environment chapter provide direction for development near
wellheads and in aquifer recharge areas. For a complete discussion of water resources and water
purveyors in the City of Spokane Valley, refer to the Capital Facilities chapter.
2.3.3 Parks and Open Space
One of the most important and valued elements of a high quality living and working environment is
a parks and open space system. Providing parks and open spaces contributes to a reduction in
environmental impacts such as noise and air pollution; increases the value of adjacent properties;
provides areas for passive and active recreation; and helps preserve the natural beauty of the City.
2.3.4 Natural Environment
Spokane Valley's natural beauty is apparent. Streams, wetlands, surrounding mountains and the
Spokane River provide a scenic backdrop as well as a source for active and passive recreation for
the citizens of Spokane Valley. The Land Use chapter seeks to protect Spokane Valley's unique
natural resources through policies that support the preservation of these areas for future
generations. The Natural Environment chapter also includes a discussion of critical areas as
defined by GMA. For a complete discussion, please refer to the Natural Environment chapter.
2.3.5 Housing
Housing is a basic human need and a major factor in the quality of life for individuals and families.
An adequate supply of affordable, attractive, and functional housing is fundamental to achieving a
sense of community. The central issue related to land use is supplying enough land to
accommodate projected growth for a range of incomes and households. Presently, housing is
provided primarily in single-family subdivisions.
This plan sets forth strategies to increase housing options and choices. The Land Use chapter
advocates changes to current development codes to increase flexibility in platting land and
encourage housing as part of mixed-use developments in commercial areas. The latter provides an
opportunity to locate housing closer to employment and shopping, and to create affordable housing.
A complete discussion of housing can be found in the Housing chapter.
2.4 Potential Annexation Areas
2.4.1 Projected Growth
In October 2003, the City of Spokane Valley received a 2000 population certification from the U.S.
Census Bureau that indicated 80,927 people called Spokane Valley home on April 1, 2000. As of
April 1, 2003 the population had grown to 82,005 (based on the Washington State Office of
Financial Management (OFM) population estimates). Upon incorporation on March 31, 2003, the
City of Spokane Valley became the state's ninth largest city and second largest in Spokane County.
1l _ . _ e . _ ..I population estimate moved Spokane Valley from the state's ninth largest city to the state's eighth
over the city's 2003 population estimate. The most recent OFM estimate for Spokane Valley is
0.90,210 as of April 1, Q-042010. This figure population increase represents an annual growth
rate of approximately 451_0 percent since 2009. The average annual growth rate is approximately
1.91%1.37% over the_-47 year period from 2003 to 20072010. Future population growth is
forecasted at the state and county level by OFM. This future population growth was distributed
between jurisdictions and unincorporated Spokane County through a methodology prepared by the
Spokane County Steering Committee of Elected Officials (SCEO). The City of Spokane Vallcy was
not allocated population growth originally because the City had not bccn incorporatcd whcn this
action took placc. Howcvcr, the County did allocatc population to the "Spokane Valley IUGA",
which includes the new cities of Spokane Valley and Liberty Lake.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 9 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
This process resulted in a population growth allocation of 39/131 to the Spokane Valley IUGA. This
- - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - -- -- - --- -•- -- . The
rate.
Using the 1.5%an average annual growth rate of 1.37%, which is consistent with past estimated
growth rates in the Spokane Valley area, the estimated 2025 2031 population of Spokane Valley is
11/1,765120,145 or an increase of 40-,-529,935 persons. The 2.5% annual growth rate results in a
- e
Spokane Valley proposed a population allocation of 20,666 to the SCEO based on the regional land
capacity methodology. This request was proposed as an "interim" request based on the,
land/population capacity within thc existing corporate boundaries of Spokane Valley. The reason
for this request was based on the significant issues related to waste water treatment capacity.
Once the waste water issues have bccn resolved, Spokane Valley will prepare a revision to the,
population allocation and present this information to thc SCEO. This issuc is discussed in more
detail below. RCW 36.70A requires that at least every ten years the incorporated and
unincorporated portions of the designated urban growth areas and the densities permitted therein,
be reviewed and revised so as to ensure that the urban growth areas are sufficient to accommodate
the urban growth that is projected by OFM to occur in the county for the succeeding 20 year
period.The Spokane County Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) approved this population
allocation in November 20011.
The City has continued to refine the population projections based on the preceding information. At
annual growth rats for purposes of population forecasting. This resulted in a 20 year population
forecast of 38,6111 persons. This information was presented to the SCEO on February 15, 2006
when the City officially requested a 20 year population allocation of 38,6111 for planning purposes.
In 20060n June 9, 2009, the BoCC approved via Resolution 46-043409-0531 a population
allocation of X518,746 for Spokane Valley for planning purposes.
2.4.2 Land Capacity Analysis
The GMA does not require a Population and Land Capacity Element to be included in the
comprehensive plan. However, GMA does require that Land Use, Housing and Capital Facilities
Elements include population densities, building intensities and estimates of future population
growth. The GMA also requires a Land Capacity Analysis, or the theoretical holding capacity of the
designated Urban Growth Areas, which by definition includes cities. By assigning the expected
population growth to the results of the Land Capacity Analysis, the area required to accommodate
the population growth is shaped.
Countywide population forecasts are identified by the CWPPs, as one criterion for consideration in
developing a regional methodology or countywide population allocation. The countywide growth
target is based on the OFM growth management population forecast for Spokane County.
The Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County was developed through the efforts of
the Land Quantity Technical Committee between March 1995 and October 1995. The Growth
Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials adopted that methodology on November 3,
1995.
The adopted methodology is patterned after the Washington State Department of Community,
Trade and Economic Development's (CTED) land quantity inventory guidebook entitled Issues in
Designating Urban Growth Areas Part I- Providing Adequate Urban Area Land Supply. Use of that
document was specified by the adopted Countywide Planning Policies (Policy Topic 1 (Urban
Growth Areas Policy#3). However, the step-by-step CTED process was modified somewhat by the
Land Quantity Technical Committee to reflect unique circumstances in Spokane County. The
following steps of the regional methodology were followed by Spokane Valley in conducting the
land capacity analysis:
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 10 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
1. Identify lands that are potential candidates to accommodate future growth - vacant,
partially-used and under-utilized land (in other words, subtract all parcels committed to
other uses).
2. Subtract all parcels that the community defines as not developable because of physical
limitation.
3. Subtract lands that will be needed for other public purposes.
4. Subtract all parcels that the community determines are not suitable for development for
social and economic reasons.
5. Subtract that percentage of land that the community assumes will not be available for
development within the community plan's 20-year time frame.
6. Build in a safety factor.
7. Determine total capacity.
Spokane Valley prepared a land capacity analysis of the city and surrounding UGAs based on the
above regional methodology. The results of the land capacity analysis are contained in the table
below:
Table 2.1 Spokane Valley UGA Land Capacity Analysis (updated 12/05/08October 2010)
Vacant and Net Developable Potential New Population
Area Partially Used Acres Dwelling Units Capacity
Land
Spokane Valley 17,28016 4
(Incorporated Area) /1,3093,314 1,2931 370 7,9337 412
93
No.+ east 43 9-
N-orthwood 723 312 1,367 3116
East 9,g 107 127 47099
Southeast 48,z 236 2,381
Sel-i 564 2729 2,722
Ponderosa 35 5 489 49-
Edgecliff/Dishman 484 132 527 1,319
TOTALS 2,181 12,575 28133
Spokane Valley recommended to the Steering Committee that both the City of Spokane Valley and
the City of Liberty Lake receive an interim population allocation that could be accommodated within
the existing city limits of each city. The rationale for this recommendation was based on the
situation regarding sanitary sewer throughout the entire Spokane region.
It is estimated that the Spokane County treatment plant will run out of capacity in 2009, and the
Liberty Lake Water & Sewer District treatment capability is currently at or near capacity. Permits to
expand the Spokane County and Liberty Lake plants from the Washington State Department of
Ecology and the Environmental Protection Agency are currently in doubt. Given the potential
constraint for both jurisdictions to provide this vital urban service, the Steering Committee
forwarded a recommendation to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners to allocate
only the population that could be accommodated within existing city limits until such time as the
sanitary sewer issues are resolved.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 11 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
2.4.3 Potential Annexation Areas
The purpose of this section is to identify the unincorporated areas within the existing Spokane
County UGA that are adjacent to the City of Spokane Valley, which would comprise potential
annexation areas for the City. Map 2.2 indicates potential annexation areas (PAAs) for the City of
Spokane Valley.
Spokane County adopted its first comprehensive plan developed under GMA in 2001. A complete
examination of urban services was required at the time the County established the UGA, moreover,
Spokane County was obligated to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act. The County's
plan included the designation of a regional UGA, which included the still unincorporated area of
Spokane Valley. The County utilized the SEPA/GMA integration process to fulfill the environmental
review requirements of the plan including the designated UGA.
When Liberty Lake incorporated in 2001 and Spokane Valley incorporated in 2003 much of the
"Valley UGA" was included as part of the newly created cities, but not all. In 2003 and again in
2006, Liberty Lake completed annexations totaling 975.69 acres of the County designated UGA.
These annexations resulted in a nearly 34 percent increase (from 4.5 square miles to just over 6
square miles) in land area for Liberty Lake.
As Table 2.1 indicates there are a number of unincorporated UGAs adjacent to Spokane Valley.
Several f f o e-UGAs are only contiguous to Spokane Valley (south, southeast, and northeast)
and would be logical areas for future annexation to the City of Spokane Valley. Spokane County
and the metro cities of Spokane Valley, Spokane, Liberty Lake and Airway Heights have begun the
process of updating the regional UGA consistent with the county wide planning policies (CWPPs).
Through this process, the City of Spokane Valley will identify areas needed to accommodate
allocated population growth by re-evaluating land quantity analysis and urban service delivery.
2.4.4 Development of Goals, Policies, and Actions for Annexation
The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires counties to designate Urban Growth Area (UGAs)
within which urban growth shall be encouraged RCW 36.70A.110 (1). UGAs are to include
sufficient land to accommodate the twenty-year population growth projected for the county. The
GMA imposes planning requirements to influence the ability of a city to annex UGAs. A city is
required by GMA to adopt policies for land use, housing, capital facilities, utilities, and
transportation within the city's UGA. In order to meet this requirement the City of Spokane Valley
has developed policies and goals to provide policy guidance for annexation of territory within UGAs.
Annexation will have financial impacts on the city; it may be positive or negative. The City may
need to develop an annexation study to
assess the financial impacts especially for
larger annexations. The Capital Facilities
chapter identifies current service
providers within the Potential Annexation
Areas (PAAs) as a starting point for the
detailed analysis that may be needed
prior to annexation.
2.5 Land Use Designations .. _:
'z ti'
The land use designations in the SVCP "�
recognize the relationships between �' �s •
broad patterns of land uses. The :j=_=' ��""' `r •
.� ;�-,..... :.:_.�•� .�`. ''.. Via.-• . ..
designations set forth locational criteria T s„�' r :'; `: ' :_..
for each specific class of uses consistent . , <r =���'"rti` w y''. ° is ,
with the long-term objectives of the -.—t-,
SVCP. These designations provide the
purpose and intent for specific zoning districts. The location of the comprehensive plan land use
designations are shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map (Map 2.1).
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 12 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
4.4.2 Growth Assumption
On June 9, 2009, the Spokane County Board of Commissioners (BoCC) approved a population
allocation of 18,746 people for the City of Spokane Valley. The allocation is the amount of people
the City can accommodate within its current municipal boundary. In addition, the BoCC approved a
population allocation of 8,138 people for the unincorporated Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) adjacent
to the City of Spokane Valley. The City of Spokane Valley has identified the adjacent UGAs as
Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). The City has identified existing service providers to help
determine the effects on existing levels of service in the event of annexation. Capital facilities
planning activities within these UGAs continue to be the County's responsibility.
The following population data is used for capital facilities planning purposes:
Table 1.1 Population Projection
Year 2804 2015 3038
Population 8.87440 93,854 106,720
Table 4.4 Population Projection
Year 2011 2017 2031
Population 91,836 96,307 107,604
4.4.3 Level of Service
Cities are often defined by the quality of facilities and services that are provided to its residents.
Good road, sewer and water infrastructure are typical criteria used by businesses considering
relocation. Park and recreation facilities are increasingly used to judge the quality of a City.
Businesses want to locate where they can attract the best employees, and quality of life issues are
often the deciding factor for a person to move to a new area.
Level of service standards are quantifiable measures, such as acres of parks per 1000 people, or
the amount of time it takes to travel a road segment during peak morning and afternoon "rush
hours," the higher the level of service the higher the cost. This element establishes levels of
service which will be used to evaluate the adequacy and future cost of urban facilities and services.
4.4.3 Concurrency
The Growth Management Act introduces the concept of concurrency, which requires new
development to be served with adequate urban services at the time of development, or within a
specified time thereafter. The GMA allows six years for necessary transportation improvements to
be constructed as long as a financial commitment is made at the time of development. The GMA
strongly encourages concurrency for water and sewer, and it is good public policy to require the
same.
4.4.4 Financing Facilities and Services
The City is limited in its ability to finance all desired capital facility projects. Options must be
available for addressing funding shortfalls or decisions must be made to lower levels of service for
public facilities. In deciding how to address a particular shortfall, the City will need to balance
current needs versus future growth requirements; existing deficiencies versus future expansions.
Capital facilities plans must be balanced. When funding shortfalls occur, the following options
should be considered:
a. Increase revenues,
b. decrease level of service standards,
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 12 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
Spokane Valley anticipates either constructing a new City Hall building, or purchasing and
remodeling an existing building within the six year time frame of this CFP. The following table
shows that Spokane Valley will use approximately $1,000,000 of Real Estate Excise Tax revenue
for Civic Buildings.
Table 4.6 Community Facilities Financing Plan
Project 2007- 2906 2009 2040 2044E 2042 Total
6
— –
Civic Facilities 563 550 7-50 47300 371-63
Total 0 0 0 563 550 7-50 47300 371-63
Revenue So
Real Estate Excise Tax 250 250 400 4-00 47000
Ccncral Fund 343 300 350 1,200 2,163
Total ' 0 0 0 563 560 7-60 47300 3463
Table 4.6 Community Facilities Financing Plan (Dollars in Thousands)
Protect 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Civic Facilities 100 100 400 400 400 400 1800
Public Works 500
Maintenance Facility
Total 600 100 400 400 400 400 2300
Revenue Source
Real Estate Excise Tax 100 100 100 200 100 200 800
General Fund 0 0 300 200 300 200 1000
Street Fund 250 250
Stormwater Fund 250 250
Total 600 W0 400 400 400 400 2300
4.4.8 Domestic Water
The City of Spokane Valley does not own or operate a public water supply system. Rather, water is
provided to Spokane Valley residences and businesses by special purpose districts, associations,
and public and private corporations. Water service is coordinated by Spokane County through the
Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP), which identifies service boundaries, establishes
minimum design standards and promotes the consolidation of regional water resource
management. The CWSP is updated as needed at the direction of the Board of County
Commissioners or the Washington State Department of Health (DOH).
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 16 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
r ..^,+o^^:+^,+:,� �,,..^ +^�^ o^^:+^,+:, Storago
..
Connections Connections Capacity
(gallons)
Bayou On Barker 0 4 8
Burger Royal 4 4 50
Carnhope Irrigation District 7 455 0 0
Central Pre Mix Sullivan Rd 4 4 0
City Of Spokane" 59700" 0 Ned
Consolidated Irrig Dist 19 System 1 3063 54 2,750,000
Consolidated Irrig Dist 19 Syctem 2 3663 444 2,200,000
East Spokane Water Dist 1 1158 94 1,027,000
Hutchinson Irrigation Dist it16 790 0 1,200,000
Honeywell Electronic Mfg LLC 0 4 4
Irvin Water District ft6 757 0 47900,000
Kaiser Alum Trcntwood Work& 0 2 2-17200
Model Irrigation Dist ft18 2116 4 550,000
Modern Electric Water Co /1302 0 475097009
Orchard Avenue Irrigation Dist 6 41-86 0 0
Pinecroft Mobile Home Park 443 0 400
Puerta Vallarta 0 4 4
Spitfire Pub And Eatery 0 2 87
Spokane Business&Inductrial Park 0 237 478,000
Spokane Co Mirabeau Park 0 2 200
Spokane Co Water Dist it3 9788 426 6,880,000
Trentwood Irrigation District 3 1170 0 1,120,000
Vera Water&Power 6652 0 8,650,000
Woodland Park Trailer Court 30 0 0
*Approximatoly 620 connoctionc within City of Spokano Valloy
Source: Washington State Department of H alth
Table 4.7 Spokane Valley Water Purveyors-Group A Systems
Current Residential Current Non Residential Storage
Group A Systems Connections Connections Capacity
(gallonsl
Bayou On Barker 0 4 0—Burger Royal 4 1 50
Carnhope Irrigation District 7 495 31 0
Central Pre Mix-Sullivan Rd 4 4 0
City Of Spokane* 59700* 0 Not reported
Consolidated Irrig Dist 19 System 1 3349 196 2.750.000
Consolidated Irrig Dist 19 System 2 5168 125 2.200.000
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 19 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
East Spokane Water Dist 1 1700 94 ' 1.277.000
Hutchinson Irrigation Dist#16 790 0 1.200.000
Honeywell Electronic Mfg LLC 0 1 0
Irvin Water District#6 1597 154 1.900.000
Kaiser Alum-Trentwood Works 0 2 21,200
Model Irrigation Dist#18 2518 6 550.000
Modern Electric Water Co 7424 824 1.500.000
Orchard Avenue Irrigation Dist 6 1255 4 0
Pinecroft Mobile Home Park 143 0 400
Puerta Vallarta 0 1 0
—
Spitfire Pub And Eatery 0 2 87
—
Spokane Business&Industrial Park 0 252 478.000
Spokane Co-Mirabeau Park 0 2 200
Spokane Co Water Dist#3 9788 426 6.880.000
Trentwood Irrigation District 3 1727 162 1.120.000
Vera Water&Power 9259 390 8.650.000
Woodland Park Trailer Court 30 0 0
*Approximately 620 connections within City of Spokane Valley
Source: Washington State Department of Health
Table 4.8 Group B Systems
Group B System Connections
Holiday Trailer Court 12
Janzen&Janzen 1
Levernier Const.Water System 1
Mercer Trucking Co Inc 1
Middco Tool&Equipment 1
Systems Transport Inc 1
Tci Water System 6
Tds 2
Union Pacific Railroad-Trentwood 1
Westco S Apparel Service 3
Western Structures Inc 2
WSDT-Pines Road Maintenance 1
Source: Washington State Department of Health
Level of Service
The Countywide Planning Policies were amended in 2004 to defer level of service standards for
water supply and fire flow to the requirements of the Department of Health and local fire codes
respectively.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 20 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Valley adopts by reference water system plans for all water purveyors providing service
within the City of Spokane Valley.
Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities
Spokane Valley adopts by reference water system plans for all water purveyors providing service
within the City of Spokane Valley.
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
Spokane Valley adopts by reference capital project and financing plans for all water purveyors
providing service within the City of Spokane Valley.
Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Service
Fire protection and emergency medical services
(EMS) are provided by Spokane Valley Fire
Department (District No. 1SVFD) and Spokane
County Fire District No. 8. Spokane Valley wi
FircSVFD serves over 90% of the Valley, while "
District 8 serves a few small areas in the southern +
part of the City (see Fire Districts Map at the end of
this chapter). Both districts serve the City with a full c 1
range of fire suppression and EMS services. -
Spokane Valley voters chose to annex to Spokanc
Vallcy Fircinto SVFD and District No. 8 in
September, 2004.
Insurance Rating
S+t -fFire departments and firc protcction districts are assigned a numerical fire protection rating by
the Washington Surveying and Ratings Bureau. Insurance companies fund the Bureau to perform
on-site inspections of fire districts to determine the rating. The Bureau analyzes five main areas:
average response time, water supply, communication network, schedule of fire inspections and fire
station evaluations (which focus on age of vehicles), personnel training and staffing of facilities.
Insurance companies use the fire protection rating to help determine insurance rates on all fire
insurance policies. The rating is on a scale of one to ten, with one representing the best score.
Quality of fire service can have a significant impact on fire insurance rates, particularly for
commercial businesses. As of April, 2006, Spokane Valley Fire DepartmentSVFD has a Fire
Insurance Rating of four three (3) and District No. 8 has a Rating of five (5), both indicating 4
excellent fire protection services.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 21 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Inventory of Existing Facilities and Apparatus
The Fire Districts Map shows the location of fire stations and service area boundaries for Spokane
Vallcy FircSVFD, District No. 8 and surrounding fire protection districts. All fire agencies have
mutual aid agreements to assist each other in major emergencies.
Spokane Valley Fire 2006SVFD 2011 apparatus inventory includes nine-10 Class AType I
engi-ne6Engines, tws-3 Type II Engines, 3 Class A pumper/ladders, two medic vehicles, three brush
trucks and other miscellaneous vehicles for staff, training, rescue, maintenance, prevention and
command. Spokanc Valley FircSVFD has ten stations, including eig-14t—seven within the City of
Spokane Valley. Locations of the stations are as follows:
Table 1.9 Spokane Valley Fire
District Station i „ ationc
Station 1" 10319 East Sprague
Station 2* 8007 Eact Trent
Station 3 2218 North Harvard
Station 1 22106 East Wellecley
Station 5" 15510 Eact Marietta
Station 6"
Station 7" 1121 South Evergreen
Station 8" North 2110 Wilbur
Station 9 East 11511 16
Station 10"" East 17217 Sprague
" Inside Spokane Valley City Limit&
""Medic only station
Table 4.9 Spokane Valley Fire
Department Station Locations
Station 1" 10319 East Sprague
Station 2 9111 E Frederick
Station 3 2218 North Harvard
Station 4 22406 East Wellesley
Station 5* 15510 East Marietta
Station 6* 6306 East Sprague
Station 7* 1121 South Evergreen
Station 8* North 2110 Wilbur
Station 9" East 12121 32nd
Greenacres Station" East 17217 Sprague
J " Inside Spokane Valley City Limits l
Fire District No. 8 has one fire station inside the City limits, station 84 in the Ponderosa
neighborhood, located at 4410 South Bates. The District has two stations located outside the City
limits providing additional coverage, No. 81 at 6117 South Palouse Highway and No. 85 at 3324
South Linke Road. Stations 81 and 84 each have two Class A engines and two wildland brush
engines. Station 85 has one Class A engine and one wildland brush engine.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 22 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Level of Service
Spokane Valley Firc'sThe Level of Service goals for response time are as follows:described in
SFVD's Standard of Cover. SVFD's Standard of Cover is consistent with the regionally adopted
minimum level of service for fire protection and emergency services.
• 5:00 minutes 80% of the time for firc calls
• 5:00 minutes 80% of the time for Basic Life Support (BLS)
• 8:00 minutes 80% of the time for Advanced Life Support (ALS)
procedures or administration of drugs. BLS providcrs can providc basic lifc saving and lift
sustaining interventions while transporting a patient to a hospital. This is the foundation on which
all medical carc is built. Good basic lifc support is key to survival of critically sick and injured
patients.
Advanced Life Support refcrs to a ccrtain level of carc that may be provided to a paticnt by reccuc
squad members, if necessary. Members trained in Advanced Life Support techniques are often
referred to as ALS providers. Among other procedures, ALS providers are able to administer certain
life saving medications, perform advanced monitoring of heart rhythms, and are trained to perform
advanccd proccdurcs to opcn and manage a patients airway.
Average response times for fire calls the past 11 years are as follows:
• 2003 5 minutes 22 scconds
• 2002 5 minutes 27 scconds
• 2001 5 minutes 28 scconds
• 2000 5 minutes 35 scconds
collection will divide calls between fire, ALS and BLS.
Spokane Valley Fire has responded to an average 7,7116 calls per year from 2000 to 2003. The
following table shows the number of calls per year.
Table 4.10 District 1 Fire Response
Year 2000 2004 2002 2803
Responses 7694 7406 7821 8165
Table 4.10 Spokane Valley Fire Department City Responses
Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
City Responses 8270 9144 10080 9480 9394
The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County establishes minimum levels of service for
fire and emergency medical services as follows:
Urban areas are required to be serviced by a Fire District with at least a Class Six Insurance rating.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 23 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
• Urban areas must be within five road miles of an operating fire station that provides service
with a "Class A" pumper, unless structures are equipped with fire sprinklers.
• Urban areas shall be served by a state certified basic life support (BLS) agency within five
miles and an operating advanced life support unit within six miles or ten minutes response
time.
Both Fire District 1 SVFD and 8 meet the minimum countywide level of service standards.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Valley Fire has identified two areas within the City of Spokane Valley that need
improvement in response times and is planning to construct new stations to provide improved
service levels. The most urgent nccd is to providc bcttcr covcragc to thc south vallcy, and the
••• •• e. ! . Ave. and Pines Rd
The northeast area of the City is underdeveloped at present but as the City grows over the next ten
to fifteen years, thc DistrictSVFD recognizes that a new station will need to be constructed to
provide an adequate level of service. The stationStation 11 will be constructed in the vicinity ofat
Barker and Euclid.
Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities
Station No. 9 will be moved from its current location at 1151'l East 1644 to the vicinity of 32"4
Pines. The station will include two bays and dorms for eight personnel. The District plans to
reconstruct Station No. 10 into a three bay facility with dorms for ten personnel. Station No. 11 will
be located in the vicinity of Barker and Euclid and will afsabehave t-w -3 bays with dorm° for eight
personne4fire apparatus. Construction for Station 11 is tentatively planned for 20111 or 20152016 or
when growth in the area will support the investment and ongoing costs.
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
Spokane Valley Fire DepartmentSVFD is a junior taxing authority thatdistrict and supplements its
regular taxes with special levies. As the restrictions on the taxes generated from the regular tax go
down, special levies are proposed to maintain needed funding. Special levies must be approved by
Fire District voters served by SVFD. The Department does not use its bonding capacity to fund
capital projects. The Department's philosophy is to reserve funds generated through its regular
revenues for future capital needs. The following table represents the Valley FiroSVFD planned
capital expenditures.
Project 2094 2007 2008 2088 2418 2011 2012 Tota4
$4700G- $4400
Fire Station No O
{new construction)
Fire Station No 10
$17$09 $440g
{reconstruction}
Total $47008 $ 00 $27800
Note: Reserve funds from regular district taxes will fund capital improvements.
{Amounts are times$1,000}
Table 4.11 SVFD Capital Protects Plan
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 24 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Protect 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total
Administration Building
$3,400 $3,400
(New construction)
Fire Station No.6
$1,600 $1,600
(Reconstruction)
Fire Station No. 11
$1,800 $1,800
(New construction)
Total $6,800
(Amounts are times$1,000)
4.4.9 Library Service
Library services are provided by the Spokane County Library District, which serves the
unincorporated county and eleven of its thirteen cities and towns. The District has a long history of
excellent service and upon incorporation, the City of Spokane Valley cxccutcd a one year
contracted with the District for continued service for its residents. After the initial y ar, Spokano
Valley and the Library District agreed to a five year contract for library services beginning in 2005.
Eighty seven percent of voters approved annexing back into the District in Ina May 2005 special
election, eighty-seven percent of voters approved annexing back into the District, with the
annexation effective January 1, 2006.
After incorporation, the Library District and the City of Spokane Valley collaborated on developing a
new capital facilities plan for the District. In March 20011, the capital facilitics planning proccss
• Comparisons with library facilities in other similar sizcd Washington citics
• Spokane Valley demographics
• Public library facility standards
• An analysis of current Spokane Valley ar a librarics
• Pros and cons of various facility alternatives and
• Community research
The Library District and the City of Spokane Valley conducted a random sample survey of Spokane
Valley residents in March and April of 20011. The survey gathered information on local library use,
satisfaction with library services and preferences regarding future library services.
■ •••• _ - -- he. o
which were City residents. Information was obtained on satisfaction with facilities and service,
current Valley Library, constructing either one or two new branches, and willingness to pay for new
libraries.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 25 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Research Conclusion
Analysis of information gathered leads to the conclusion that additional library space is needed to
a viablc altcrnativc. The community input showcd a vcry high Icvcl (98%) of overall satisfaction
with library services and a high level of satisfaction with current facilities. The public identified two
ar ac nccding improvcmcnt matcrials availability, which rcquircs a larger library, and public
Community S.
Spokane Valley's Community Preference Survey
included a question to gauge Spokane Valley
citizen's satisfaction with current Library services. _
The majority of survey respondents viewed library -
services in a positive light, with 83% of : `.
respondents rcporting that library scrviccc wcrc
•
ease, ease e - -- -- . •- , L. L
Inventory of Existing Facilities .r. . _
Spokane Valley has one library located inside its
boundary, the District's Valley Branch, located at 12004 East Main. This resource library is the
District's largest facility, measuring 22,490-950 square feet, including branch administrative space.
The District has two other libraries within the greater Valley area located at 4322 North Argonne
and 22324 East Wellesley in Otis Orchards.
As of May 2- 042010, approximately 35,511133 000 Spokane Valley residents were Library District
cardholders. Valley Library was the primary branch of VALLEY
registration, with Argonne second and Otis Orchards
third. Spokane County Library District has a
reciprocal library cardborrowinq agreement with the
City of Spokane with over 1,500 Spokane Valley I-■r; beg.-
residents having a Spokane public Public z �
library Library card.
Library Facility Master Plan = E1aa,a
In March 2008 voters defeated a proposal to establish
a proposed Greater Spokane Valley Library Capital Facility area to issue General Obligation Bonds
for construction of a new main library and a new neighborhood branch in the eastern area of the
City. The District subsequently undertook a capital facilities planning process for its entire service
area, resulting in the July 2010 Board of Trustees approval of a 20-year Library Facilities Master
Plan (LFMP). Using 2031 population estimates based on Spokane County GMA population
allocations, the LFMP addresses current and future facility needs in each of its five geographic
service areas: the Greater Spokane Valley, North County, Southeast County, Southwest County,
and Moran/Glenrose Prairie.
LFMP development included community research (customer and community telephone surveys,
focus groups, and community leader interviews); population growth estimating by geographic area;
evaluations of existing facilities and sites; and a public input process. The plan proposes
replacement of three existing libraries with new facilities, the addition of three new branches, and
remodeling/expansion of five others at a total cost of$50.8 million (2010 dollars).
Level of Service
The Spokane County Library District has not established a level of service. The Library Facilities
Master Plan establishes a Level of Service (LOS) of 0.5 square feet per capita for the overall
District, with a target 0.5 square feet per capita within each of the five geographic regions served.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 26 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Forecast of Future Needs
The District uses a target Spokane Valley population of 105,000 for its futurc projcctions, which is
consistent with the City of Spokane Valley's population allocation for growth within the existing City
limits. The District recognizcs that a new library nccds to bc built insidc Spokanc Vallcy to provido
adcquatc library scrviccs. Futurc facilitics will bc dividcd bctwccn a main branch and a futuro
The LFMP uses a 2031 Spokane Valley population estimate of 108,000 for
its future projections, consistent with the City of Spokane Valley's GMA population allocation for
growth within the existing City limits. The District recognizes that new library facilities need to be
built inside Spokane Valley to provide adequate library services to its residents. Future facilities will
be divided between a main branch and two future neighborhood branches.
Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities
The main branch should measure about '19,000 square feet to adequately serve a population of
811,000 people. The main branch should bc locatcd on an artcrial strcct within about one half mil°
approximatcly 15,000 squarc fcct scrving a population of 20,000 would ideally be located within two
to three miles of the main branch. A new main branch to replace the existing Spokane Valley
Library should contain about 50,000 square feet of space and should be located on an arterial
street within about one-half mile of the Sprague corridor between Dartmouth and Evergreen Roads.
To better serve the Veradale and Greenacres areas, a new neighborhood branch of approximately
12,000 square feet should be built on District-owned property on Conklin Road, immediately south
of Sprague Avenue. A second new branch to serve the South Valley should be built between
Dishman-Mica and Evergreen Roads on or immediately south of 32nd Avenue.
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
The future main branch is estimated to cost $11.1115.56 million in 20011 2010 dollars; the
neighborhood branch would cost about $&5_1 million each. _ - ___ _. -_ _--- - __ 'e- _
bonds are the normal financing method for library projects of this size. Besides construction costs
and fees, the estimates include library materials, furnishings, and equipment. Voter-approved
general obligation bonds are the normal financing method for library projects of this size.
The District's Library Facilities Master Plan proposes a three phase capital improvement schedule
that includes all Spokane Valley projects in the first two phases. The earliest feasible date for a
District-wide bond election to carry out the proposed projects is early 2013, which for purposes of
the schedule is Year 1.
Phase 1: Years 1 to 4
• Complete property purchases (Year 1)
• Design, construct, and open replacement Spokane Valley branch (Years 1-4)
Phase 2: Years 3 to 8
• Design, construct, and open new Conklin Road branch (Years 3-5)
• Sell existing Spokane Valley branch (Year 5)
• Design, construct, and open new South Valley branch (Years 6-8)
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 27 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
1 to 5 y am
• Determine preferred locations for new libraries.
• Develop funding plan.
• Purchase land for libraries.
5 to 10 years
• Secure funding and purchase site(s) if not already done.
• Construct new main branch.
• Sell existing Valley branch.
10 to 20 years
Project 2096 200; 2008_ 2005 2044 2044 2042 Total
New Spokane Valley $4-80 $4-50 $1,700 $8,300 $8,750 0 0 $4-97080
Library
Total $4-89 $150 $1,700 48,309 $8,750 0 Q. $4-07800
Revenue Sourced
G9-Bond-Is $4-89 $150 $1,700 $87509 $8,750 0 Q. 43880
Total $484 $450 $ 00 $8;500 6-877-50- 4 4 48044
Note: The majority of Ceneral Fund expenses incurred in 2006 and 2007 are reimbursable from voter approved bond funds.
Table 4.12 Spokane County Library District six year Capital Protects and Financing Plan
(Assumes a 2013 bond issue approval)
Project 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 F 2017 Total
New Spokane Valley 0 0 $1,250" $800 $7,380 $7,380 0 $16,810
Library
New Conklin Road 0 0 0 0 $200 $2,450 $2,450 $5,100
Library
New South Valley 0 I 0 $250` 0 0 0 0 $250
Library""
Total I 0 0 $1,500 $800 $7,580 $9,830 $2,450 $22,160
Revenue Sources
District Funds 0 0 $1,500 0 0 0 0 $1,500
GO Bonds 0 0 0 $800 $7,580 $9,830 $2,450 $20,660
Total 0 0 $1,500 $800 $7,580 $9,830 $2,450 $22,160
*These expenses are reimbursable from voter-approved bond funds.
""The South Valley Library's design,construction,and opening is in 2018-2020,outside the Six Year Plan
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 28 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
The Library District will continue coordinate to work with the City of Spokane Valley to further
Plan will be amended to incorporate future changes. in identifying and procuring building sites,
planning the bond issue election, in carrying out design and construction of the new libraries. As
the LFMP is updated, this Capital Facilities Plan will be amended to incorporate future changes.
Operational Costs
The Library District assumes that with efficient building design and continuing staff productivity
improvements, a larger Valley Library and an eventual new branch can be operated at normal
District funding levels of 50 cents per$1,000 of assessed valuation.
4.4.10 Parks and Recreation
Spokane Valley has a wide range of , N •r.1. W F
recreational opportunities available to residents , t wl
•and visitors. City parks, school play fields, golf 1,•
courses, trails, County parks and conservations `�
areas are all within close vicinity to Spokane ' ' : k. ,
A
Valley residents. •: �s .'
The City provides a system of local parks that ; "
is managed by the Spokane Valley Parks and
Recreation Department. The Parks ' �*?� � �
—
Department is in the process of developing a — r —
new Parks, Recreation, and Open Spaces _t
Master Plan. When finished, this plan will offer
a detailed picture of the park, recreation and
open space system, including changes and
improvements that will be made in the future. •
This section of the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) provides summaries of the parks inventory, level of
service (LOS), future park needs, proposed projects, and a financing plan for the next six years.
Park Types
Parks are classified by their size, service area and function. Spokane Valley uses the nationally
recognized Park, Recreation, Open Space and Greenway Guidelines, to establish standard for
parks planning. Major classifications include mini-park, neighborhood, school-park, community,
large urban, various trail designations and special use facilities. The Parks Element, Chapter 9,
provides a thorough description of park types used for planning purposes.
Inventory of Existing Facilities
The Parks Map, found at the end of this Chapter, shows the location of all parks within Spokane
Valley. Table 4.13 provides an inventory of park and recreation facilities owned by Spokane Valley.
These parks are used to calculate Spokane Valley's level of service for parks. The Parks Master
Plan provides the most detailed inventory of parks, including equipment, structures and other
miscellaneous park facilities.
Table 4.13 Spokane Valley Park Facilities
Spokane Valley Parks Acreage Status
Neighborhood Parks
Balfour Park 2.86 Developed
Browns Park 8.03 Developed
Castle Park 2.71 Minimally Developed
Edgecliff Park 4.74 Developed
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 29 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Level of Service
The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County requires all jurisdictions to adopt a level of
service (LOS) standard for parks. Spokane
Valley has the flexibility and freedom to adopt a
LOS standard for parks that reflects the
expressed need and desire of our community. tp
The National Recreation and Parks Association
suggest that cities adopt LOS standards for / T;/
different park types, such as mini (pocket) , �r J
neighborhood, community and major parks.
Spokane Valley does not have a well-developed
park system and will use total City-owned park
acres for its LOS measurement.
Spokane Valley currently owns 163 acres of � x •
2006 population of 85,010 people, the currents' . "
parks LOS is 1.92 acres of City park land for
every 1000 rccidcnts. In 2006, Spokane Valley adapts-adopted a LOS of 1.92 acres/1000 people
as its minimum LOS standard for
Table 9.19 Spokane Valley Parks Level of Service
Spokane Valley recognizes that
schools, churches, natural areas and
City owned Level of Service commercial enterprises all provide
Park Acres
recreation opportunities for Spokane
Valley residents. These will all be
80 a 1.92 acres/1000 taken into consideration when
Spokane Valley determines the best
location to purchase new park land.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Valley has the capacity to accommodate an additional 2076-6416 493 people over the next
20 years within the current City limits. In order to maintain the current adopted LOS of 1.92
acres/1000 people, Spokane Valley would have to add about 40-35 acres of park land over the next
20 years, with 413 acres in the first six years, as shown in Table 4.15. The Parks Master Plan
provides a more detailed analysis of park and recreation needs by dividing the City into smaller
service areas.
Table 4.15 Future Park Demand
Year Population Total Park Acres Acres Required at 1.92 Net Deficiency Acres
Available acres/1000
28862011 85704491 836 163172
46.1177 8-5
20122017 92724896 307 - 448172 47- 185 -44-13
20252031 105,676107.604 443172 203207 -48-35
*Assumes 20-year growth of 40766416,493 people
Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities
In order to maintain the adopted 1.92 acres/1000 level of service standard, Spokane Valley must
would need to add 42-13 acres of park land by the year 20112017. In order to address this
deficiency, Spokane Valley will purchase 20 acres of park land within the six y ar time framc of this
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 31 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
will be used to determine the best locations for park land acquisitions.
Table A 46 Parke Capacity Anal yeie
Populatio Total Park Acres Required
Year Acres at 1.92 Net Reserve Acrco
11
Available o�i4 000000
2006 85,010 H 463 1 463 8
2012 92,213 183* 1 6
`20 acres of parkland will be purchased within first 6 years of plan
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
The following table details Spokane Valley's six year Parks and Recreation capital improvement
financing plan. The table details projects that address level of service deficiencies (capacity
projects) and other capital improvements (non-capacity) projects.
Project 2996 209 2096 2096 2044 2011 2012 Total-
Park Land Acquisition (20 1-880 $1880
Acres Capacity)
Park Improvcmcntc 300 950 500 500 580 490 200 $•,130
Swimming Pool Upgradco 1400 $1,609
Total 17208 27550 508 508 568 400 208 $54,30
Revenue e
Ccncral Fund 4-8 300 $17690
BEET#1 450 400 400 400 490 200 $1,950
s 200 1-00 1-00 1-80 $580
Spokane County 4400 –
Total 17308 2,550 509 509 ' 580 490 299 $530
Table 4.17 Parks Capital Facilities Plan
Note:Amounts in$1,000
Protect 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
Park Improvements 1,959 100 100 100 100 100 100 $2,559
Swimming Pool Upgrades
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 32 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Table 4.17 Parks Capital Facilities Plan
Note:Amounts in$1,000
Total 1,959 100 100 100 100 100 100 $2,559
Revenue Source
General Fund 1,959 50 50 50 50 50 50 $2,259
REET#1 50 50 50 50 50 50 $300
500 $500
Grants
Spokane County
Total 1.959 100 100 600 100 100 100 $3,059
4.4.11 Public Safety
The Spokane Valley Police Department is a contract law enforcement agency, partnering with the
Spokane County Sheriff's Department to provide a safe environment for the citizens, businesses,
and visitors of the City of Spokane Valley. This unique contracting relationship allows for the
sharing of many of our resources, allowing both agencies to operate at peak efficiency without
duplicating services.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 33 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Spokane Valley also contracts with Spokane County for judicial, jail and animal control services.
The total contract for public safety for 2-046-2011 totaled over $16 $15.3 million, including
approximately 100 commissioned police officers.
Spokane Valley supports community oriented policing and recognizes it as an important
complement to traditional law enforcement. In Spokane County, community policing is known as
S.C.O.P.E., or Sheriff Community Oriented Policing Effort. The community policing model balances
reactive responses to calls for service with proactive problem-solving centered on the causes of
crime and disorder. Community policing requires police and citizens to join together as partners in
the course of both identifying and effectively addressing these issues. About 364 Spokane Valley
citizens are S.C.O.P.E volunteers.
Community Survey
The Community Preference Survey included questions to gauge the public's perception of police
services. Results show that 85% of Spokane Valley residents believe police services are good,
very good, or excellent, indicating a generally high level of confidence in the police force. Only 27%
of respondents expressed a willingness to pay additional taxes to have improved police services.
Inventory of Existing Facilities
The Spokane Valley Police Precinct is located at 12710 E. Sprague and houses patrol and
detective divisions, the traffic unit and administrative staff. The Precinct also includes a- roperty
storage facility and a Spokane County District Court.
Spokane Valley is served by five four S.C.O.P.E. stations, shown in the following table.
Table 4.18 Spokane Valley S.C.O.P.E station
Nei orhoo Location Nei erhood Location
West Valley 3102 North Argonne Trentwood 2/100 N.Wilbur#79
University 10621 East 15'4 Central Valley 115 N. Evergreen Rd.
Edgecliff 522 S.Thierman Rd. East /1903 N. Harvard#3
Table 4.18 Spokane Valley S.C.O.P.E stations
Neighborhood Location Neighborhood Location
University 10621 East 15`h Trentwood 2400 N.Wilbur#79
Edgecliff 522 S.Thierman Rd. Central Valley 115 N. Evergreen Rd.
Level of Service
Public safety is a priority for the City of Spokane Valley. It is difficult to determine at this time, an
adequate and measurable level of police protection. Spokane Valley will monitor the performance
of the Spokane County Sheriff's Department and will adjust the contract for services as necessary
to ensure an adequate level of police protection.
Forecast of Future Needs
Future needs for police protection will be determined as a part of the annual budget process.
Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities
Spokane Valley is not planning to construct any new law enforcement facilities at this time.
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
Spokane Valley is not planning to construct any new law enforcement facilities at this time.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 34 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
In 1988, the intergovernmental agency known as the Spokane Regional Solid Waste System
(System) was formed by interlocal agreement between the City of Spokane, Spokane County and
all other cities and towns within the County. The System is responsible for implementing solid
waste management plans, planning and developing specific waste management programs and
updating solid waste plans for the entire County. The System is managed by the City of Spokane,
which uses its structure to carry out the various solid waste management programs for our region.
In Spokane Valley, solid waste services are provided by private haulers licensed by the Washington
Utility and Transportation Commission (W.U.T.C.) through franchise agreements. Waste
Management of Spokane provides residential and commercial garbage services and weekly
curbside recycling collection; Sunshine Disposal provides only commercial services. At this time,
Spokane Valley residents are allowed to self-haul their garbage to an appropriate dumping site.
Inventory of Existing Facilities
The Regional Solid Waste System includes a Waste to Energy facility located at 2900 South
Geiger, and two recycling/transfer stations. One of the stations is located within Spokane Valley at
3941 N. Sullivan Road south of Trent and across from the Spokane Industrial Park; the other is
located in north Spokane County at the intersection of Elk-Chattaroy Road and Highway 2.
Landfills are necessary to provide disposal for solid waste that cannot be recycled or incinerated, or
that exceeds the capacity of the WTE Facility. The Spokane County Regional Health District
licenses six privately owned landfills in Spokane County.
Level of Service
The minimum Regional Level of Service Standards requires solid waste services to meet all State
and Federal regulations.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Valley is participating on the update of the Spokane County Waste Management Plan
(SCWMP). The SCWMP update process will determine future needs for solid waste disposal.
Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities
The updated Spokane County Solid Waste Management Plan will provide information on future
regional solid waste facilities.
Finance Plan
The updated Spokane County Solid Waste Management plan will include a financing plan for future
regional solid waste facilities.
4.4.15 Stormwater Facilities
Stormwater runoff in Spokane Valley flows to a combination of public and private facilities. In
developed areas, runoff infiltrates into the ground or flows down street gutters and is disposed
Ito drywells in public road rights-of-way, drywells on private property and grassy swales with
overflow drywells in easements on private property.
There are advantages and disadvantages to relying on on-site facilities for all stormwater
management. One advantage is that on-site facilities are typically constructed with private funds
and can be integrated into the development as a green space amenity. However, on-site facilities
are sometimes not well maintained. Their capacity may be diminished over time or they may fail
entirely during large runoff events. On-site facilities may take up large portions of a development
site, thereby reducing the effective density that can be accommodated in that area.
In 2004, the Spokane Valley City Council created a stormwater utility to develop and maintain storm
drainage systems on City owned public land. To create revenues for the stormwater utility
operations, the Council adopted an annual fee per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU). Residential
ERUs are based on the number of single-family dwellings, while Commercial ERUs are based on
the square footage of impervious surface associated with a business or commercial development.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 47 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Inventory of Existing Facilities
Spokane Valley's inventory of stormwater facilities, most of which are integral to the safe function of
our street system, consists of about 5-, 997,200 drywells, 928 1900 bio-infiltration swales,_ six 61
detention ponds, and one retention pond. Other facilities include curb inlets, bridge drains, and
culverts, all of which require monitoring and maintenance. The retention pond, located at Dishman-
Mica Road. and 32nd Ave., was constructed as a part of a road project and provides a disposal point
for water flowing from Chester Creek. The inventory does not reflect stormwater structures located
on private properties that do not serve the public street drainage system.
Level of Service
The Spokane County Board of Commissioners adopted new regional level of service standards for
stormwater in 2004 as a part of the Countywide Planning Policies update_-
"Flooding of property outside designated drainage-ways, defacto drainage-ways,
easements, flood zones or other approved drainage facilities, during the design
precipitation or runoff event prescribed in the standards of the governing local
agency or jurisdiction, shall be prevented within the reasonable probability afforded
by such standards. Impact to buildings and accessory structures shall be avoided to
the maximum extent practicable by evaluating the effects of a100-year rain event,
and implementing measures to ensure that the runoff attendant to such event is
directed away from such buildings and accessory structures. Any stormwater
discharge to surface or ground waters must meet federal, state and local
requirements for water quality treatment, stormwater runoff and infiltration."
The standards reflect current best practices that are established in adopted stormwater design
guidelines. Spokane Valley follows said guidelines in reviewing and approving new development
and is therefore in compliance with the regional LOS standards for stormwater runoff.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Valley will continue to use private, on-site treatment facilities for new development and will
install drywells, swales and other facilities as needed for new street improvement projects.
Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities
Location and capacities of future facilities is dependent on the location and size of new
development, future public street projects, and projects that will address current problem areas
within the City. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will incorporate capital programming
for stormwater facilities.
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
The City currently charges a $29$21 annual stormwater utility fee per Equivalent Residential Unit
(ERU) to generate revenues for stormwater facility engineering, maintenance and administration.
The stormwater fee is expected to generate$1.2$1.8 million annually.
Transportation Facilities
Inventory of Existing Facilities
This section of the Capital Facilities Plan includes transportation facilities within Spokane Valley,
including streets, bridges, pathways and sidewalks. Street maintenance is not included as a part of
the Capital Facilities Plan.
Spokane Valley is responsible for about 455 miles of public roads, including 51 miles of Urban
Principal Arterials, 61 miles of Urban Minor Arterials, 44 miles of Urban Collectors, and 298.85
miles of Local Access Streets. Table 4.36 provides a list of all arterial intersections within Spokane
Valley.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 48 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Funding for the operation and expansion of the City's transportation system falls into several
categories, which include federal, state and city funds. Some sources consist of reliable annual
funds while others are periodic, such as grants. The use, availability and applicability of these
various sources are not always at the discretion of the City. Spokane Valley will develop a track
record with funding agencies as time goes on, which will help make to make more reliable funding
assumptions.
A summary of expected federal, state and local funding sources for the City's six year Capital
Improvement Program is shown in Table 4.39. The following is a summary of transportation
funding options.
Federal Assistance
These funds are authorized under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
Act for the 21st Century (SAFETEA-21) and are administered by the Federal Highway
Administration through Washington State Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan
Planning Organization (Spokane Regional Transportation Council). Federal funding programs
include Bridge Replacement (BR), Congestion Management and Air Quality (CMAQ) and the
Surface Transportation Program (STP).
State Assistance
The Washington State Transportation Improvement Board administers State transportation
programs, including the Urban Corridor Program (UCP), the Urban Arterial Program (UAP), and the
Sidewalk Program (SP).
City Funds
Spokane Valley contributes revenues from the General Fund and the Real Estate Excise Tax funds
for transportation projects. The City also receives State Motor Fuel Tax and Restricted State Fuel
Tax.
20-14
(dollars in thousands\
Itm^ Project Description Primary City Tota4
-# - Source A ount A ount
4- Barker Road Bridge, 6)-14 55 X07
4 Broadway Ave 180 ft E.of Moore to Flora UAP 68 2,1165
4 Park Road #2(PE Only) Broadway to Indiana, STP(U) 3/ 2/6
4 Broadway Avenue Safety Project Pines(SR 27)to Park 1 167 83/
6 Indiana Ave Extension 3600'e/o Sullivan Rd to Mission&Flora kJGR 26/ 1,87/1
6 Argonne Road 190 to Trent, CMAQ 77 576
Broadway/Sullivan Intersection PCG STA 253 1,230
Indiana/Sullivan Intersection PCC STA 275 1,3/12
I3 Sullivan Road (PE only) Euclid to Wellesley STP(U) 10 298
44 Sullivan/Sprague Intersection PCC City 933 1,678
44 Pavement Management Program Arterial& Other rccC°° 2,000 11,000
44 Pavement Management Program Local Access, City 2,000 2,00G
44 STEP Paveback City 3,5/13 3,5/13
- - 2010 Totals: 9,709 20,493
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 61 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan
2011
(dollars in thousands)
Item Project Description Primary City Total
# _ Source Amount Amount
1 Park Road-#2(PE Only)-Broadway to Indiana, STP(U) 5 35
2 Indiana Ave Extension-3600'e/o Sullivan Rd to Mission&Flora UCP 53 375
3 Argonne Road-190 to Trent, CMAQ 101 713
4 Indiana/Sullivan Intersection PCC STA 249 1,216
5 Pines Corridor ITS: Sprague to Trent CMAQ 216 1,609
6 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation(PE Only) Other Fed 0 1,900
7 Broadway Argonne/Mullan Intersections PCC(PE/RW Only) STP(U) 37 271
8 Mission Ave.-Flora to Barker(PE/RW Only STP(U) 66 488
9 Pavement Management Program-Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000
10 Pavement Management Program-Local Access City 2,000 2,000
11 STEP Paveback City 602 602
12 Sullivan/Euclid PCC Intersection(PE/RW Only) STP(U) 22 163
13 Sullivan West Bridge BR 0 668
2011 Totals: 5,351 14,040
2011
(dollars in thousands}
Item Project Description Primary City Total
-# - Source Amount Am ou+nt
6 Argonne Road 190 to Trent, CMAQ 101 713
6 Sullivan Road (PE only) Euclid to Wellesley STP(U) 10 298
14 Pavement Management Program Arterials Other—Fed 2,000 1,000
1-a Pavement Management Program Local Access City 2,000 2,000
4-3 STEP Paveback City 757 757
44 Pines Corridor ITS: Sprague to Trent CMAQ 280 2,081
4-6 Sullivan Road Wcct Bridge 117 735
4-4 Mission Ave. Flora to Barker STP(U) 128 010
- - 2011 Totals: 5,453 11,533
Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan
2012
(dollars in thousands)
Item Project Description Primary City Total
# _ Source Amount Amount
6 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation(PE Only) Other Fed 0 2,700
8 Mission Ave.-Flora to Barker(PE/RW Only) STP(U) 58 430
9 Pavement Management Program—Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000
10 Pavement Management Program-Local Access City 2,000 2,000
13 Sullivan West Bridge BR 0 1,435
14 Broadway Ave. Extension—Flora to Barker(PE Only) City 265 265
15 Evergreen/32nd-16th to 32nd, Evergreen to SR-27(PE Only) City 312 312
16 Park Road-#2(RW/CN Only)-Broadway to Indiana STP(U) 135 1,000
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 62 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
17 Saltese/Sullivan Signal Developers 62 250
18 Sullivan Rd. Corridor Traffic Study(1-90 to Wellesley) STP(U) 27 200
19 University Rd/1-90 Overpass Study STP(U) 34 250
20 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan Intersections PCC(CN Only) STP(U) 280 2,075
21 Sullivan/Euclid PCC Intersection(CN Only) STP(U) 169 1,253
2012 Totals: 5,342 16,170
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 63 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
2012
(.Jolla.-e in thousands)
ttern Project Description Primary City Total
4 - Source Amount Amount
44 Pavement Management Program Arterials Other—Fed nnn /1,000
42 Pavement Management Program Local Access City 2,00G 2,000
45- Sullivan Road West Bridge 8R 147 735
44 Mission Ave. Flora to Barker STP(U) 671 /1,967
4T Park Road #2(CN Only) Broadway to Indiana STP(U) 262 1,9/12
44 Bowdish Road 32nd to 8th STP(U) 116 862
- - 2012 Totals: 5,196 14,506
Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan
2013
(dollars in thousands)
Item Project Description Primary City Total
# _ Source Amount Amount
9 Pavement Management Program-Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000
10 Pavement Management Program-Local Access City 2,000 2,000
13 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 0 768
14 Broadway Ave. Extension–Flora to Barker(PE Only) City 265 265
15 Evergreen/32nd-16th to 32nd, Evergreen to SR-27(PE Only) City 312 312
16 Park Road-#2(RW/CN Only)-Broadway to Indiana STP(U) 540 4,000
22 Mission Ave.-Flora to Barker(CN Only) STP(U) 536 3,969
_ 2013 Totals: 5,653 15,314
2013
(dollars in thousands}
Item Project Description Primary City Total
-# - Source Amount Amount
Othe Fed 004 '1,000
4- Pavement Management Program Local Access City —27004 2,000
45. Sullivan Road Wcct Bridge $R 1,300 6,500
4,T Park Road #2(CN Only) Broadway to Indiana STP(U) 5Ot 3,767
46 Bowdish Road 32nd to 8th STP(U) 89 655
48 Park Road Bridging the Valley/BNSF Crade Separation th
Om er-FFed 31 750
24 Saltese/Sullivan Signal Developers 62 250
2013 Totals: —5494 17,922
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 64 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan
2014
(dollars in thousands)
Item Project Description Primary City Total
# _ Source Amount Amount
9 Pavement Management Program-Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000
10 Pavement Management Program-Local Access City 2,000 2,000
13 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 0 8,440
23 Barker Road—South City Limits to Appleway(PE Only) City 236 236
24 Bowdish Road-32nd to 8th(PE Only) STP(U) 52 384
25 Broadway Ave. Extension—Flora to Barker(PE Only) UCP 100 500
26 Flora Road—Sprague to Mission(PE Only) City 216 216
27 Sidewalk Infill Program STP(E) 45 330
2014 Totals: 4,649 16,106
2044
(dollars in thousands}
lters Project Deccription Primary City Total
4 - Source Amount Amount
14 Pavement Management Program Arterial& e
t
OOther—Fed d 2,000 -47089
42 Pavement Management Program Local Access City 2,000 2,000
1,5 Sullivan Road West Bridge 13-R 1,300 6,500
1-B Bowdish Road 32nd to 8th STP(U) 1,051 7,782
Other—Fed 90 2,150
2-1- Sprague/Barker Traffic Signal Dever 15 75
- - 201/1 Totals: 6,156 22,507
Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan
2015
(dollars in thousands)
Item Project Description Primary City Total
# _ Source Amount Amount
9 Pavement Management Program-Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000
10 Pavement Management Program-Local Access City 2,000 2,000
13 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 0 8,440
23 Barker Road—South City Limits to Appleway(PE Only) City 236 236
24 Bowdish Road-32nd to 8th(PE Only) STP(U) 52 384
25 Broadway Ave. Extension—Flora to Barker(RW/CN Only) UCP 100 500
26 Flora Road—Sprague to Mission(PE Only) City 216 216
27 Sidewalk Infill Program STP(E) 36 270
28 Evergreen ITS Im.rovements CMAQ 17 126
Evergreen/32nd-16th to 32nd, Evergreen to SR-27
29 jRW/CN Only1 STP(U) 54 400
2015 Totals: 4,711 16,572
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 65 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
2015
(.Jolla.-e in thousands)
l-tern Project Description Primary City Total
4 - Source Amount Amount
44- Pavement Management Program Arterial& Other–Fed 2,000 1,000
42 Pavement Management Program Local Access, City 27000 2,000
49 = __ _ •' ._ _ _ _ __' _'__ _ _ Other Fed 286 6,800
24- Sprague/Barker Traffic Signal -Developers 74 370
22 Appleway Extension University to Evergreen STP 64 205
23 Barker Road Applcway to Broadway Avenue, UAP 52 259
24- Mansfield Extension Pinec(SR27)to 300 ft East of Houk Rd UAP 73 367
25 Sullivan Road (RW/CN only) Euclid to Wellesley STP(U) 54 400
26 Sullivan Road North Extension(Bigelow Gulch) City 55 55
2T Trent(SR290) Del Ray to Barker Turn Lanc Developers 133 532
22 Park/Sprague Intersection PCC STP(P) —19 138
29- Sullivan Rd ITS, Broadway to 24th CMAQ 150 1,108
39 Citywide ITS Improvements CMAQ 95 700
34- Evergreen/32nd 16th to 32nd, Evergreen to SR 27 STP(U) 161 1,215
- - 2015 Totals: 5,219 18,158
Table 4.38 Six-Year Transportation Capital Facilities and Financing Plan
2016
(dollars in thousands)
Item Project Description Primary City Total
# _ Source Amount Amount
9 Pavement Management Program-Arterials Other Fed 2,000 4,000
10 Pavement Management Program-Local Access City 2,000 2,000
25 Broadway Ave. Extension–Flora to Barker(RW/CN Only) UCP 812 4,062
27 Sidewalk Infill Program STP(E) 162 1,200
28 Evergreen ITS Improvements CMAQ 79 582
Evergreen/32nd-16th to 32nd, Evergreen to SR-27
29 (RW/CN Only) STP(U) 647 4,791
30 Appleway Extension-University to Evergreen STP 127 406
31 Greenacres Trail Planning Study(Sullivan Rd.to Liberty Lake) STP(E) 28 210
32 Mansfield Extension-Pines(SR27)to 300-ft East of Houk Rd City 136 136
33 Millwood Urban Trail-Fancher Rd.to Evergreen Rd. STP(E) 59 439
34 Park Rd/BNSF Grade Separation Other Fed. 31 750
35 Sullivan Rd ITS, Broadway to 24th CMAQ 183 1,356
2016 Totals: 6,264 19,932
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 66 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Planned is Totals
Ycal- Fcdcral State other City Total Fcdcral State Othef City Total Fcdcral State Other Frty Total
2044 $2453 4826 $2405 $271-6 $407950 $2409 $9 $4 $.7-7544 $4,543 $453 $37826 $2405 59409 $207493
2014 $2,674 „! ::! $424 $3042 $3,109 :.I ::! $5,032 $87444 $6,080 ::! ::! $57453 $41,533
2012 $9 $9 $9 $0 $0 $9;349 $0 $0 $57-1-94 $4404 $4,349 $9 $4 $5496 $14,506
2013 ::! ::! ::! ::! ::! $41,388 $ 4 $225 S504 $47,922 $41,388 $34$ $225 $5491- $47,922
214 $9 $9 $9 $0 $0 $14476 $444 $154 $$6 456 $22,597 $11,476 4414 464 $.64$ $22,597
2015 ..! :.1 ::! :.! ::! $87427 $3439 $4025 $57214 $18,102 $87477 $37384 $4025 $57244 $18,102
Totals. $4424 $3836 $2905 $2,587 $11,012 $497560 $47648 $4444 $35,129 $91,021 $51,281 07444 $1,319 $38,016 $405,063
Table 4.39 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program Summary 2011 through 2016(in$1,0001
Secured Projects Planned Projects Totals
ear Federal State Other ay Total Federal State Other ay Total Federal State Other ay Total
12011 $2,832 $282 $1,007 $749 $4,870 $4,339 $134 195 $4,602 $9,170 $7,171 $416 $1,102 $5,351 $14,040
12012 $372 20 20 $430 $9,846 $287 $323 $5284 $15,740 $10,218 $287 $323 $5,342 $16,170
12013 u0 20 20 20 20 $9507 $154 50 $5,653 $15,314 $9,507 $154 E0 $5,653 $15,314
12014 20 20 20 20 20 $9,369 $2,088 20 $4,649 $16,106 $9,369 $2.088 20 $4,649 $16,106
12015 20 20 20 20 20 $9,773 $2,088 50 $4,711 $16,572 $9,773 $2,088 $ $4,711 $16,572
12016 20 20 20 20 20 $10,057 $3,574 5Z $6,264 $19,932 $10,057 $3,574 $6,264 $19,932
iota Is $3204 $282 $1,007 $807 $5,300 $52,891 $8,325 $455 $31,163 $92,834 $56,095 $8,607 $1,462 $31,970 $98,134
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 67 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Project-ame Project De ption Cost
32nd Avenue Evergreen to Reconstruct and widen to three lanes with
Best curbs and sidewalks. 2,237.00
8th Avenue Phase 1 Carnahan -e•- __ -. e - • -- _•- _-_
to Havana with curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes. 37453:-99
8th Avenue Phase 2 Park to Reconstruct 8th Ave.to a three lane section
Dickey with curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes. 5,120.00
8th Avenue Phase 3 Dickey to -_-•_ __ -. e - • -- _•- _-_ -
Carnahan with curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes. 4 -99
Appleway Extension Evergreen Extend Appleway Blvd.with a multi lanc
to Tshirley facility including curbs and sidewalks. 13,219.00
Reconstruct to 3 lane roadway w/center
turn lane, sidewalks, curb&gutter and
Barker Road 8th to Appleway stormwater 5,175.00
Barker Road Spokane River to
Trent Reconstruct to a 2 lane curbed arterial 9,539-:99
Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan
Intercections PCC Reconstruct intersections in PCC 1,556.00
Broadway Ave Flora to Barker Reconstruct to 3 lanes, Flora to Barker 6,821.99
Carnahan Truck Lane 8th to
City Limits, Add SB truck Lane to road 509
Euclid Ave/Flora Rd Flora
Euclid to Euclid, Euclid Flora to Reconstruct to provide a 2 lane, shouldered
Barker arterial 5,'108.-99
Flora Road Sprague to Mission Reconstruct&widen to 3 lane roadway 5,175.00
Kiernan &Sullivan PCC Reconstruct Intercection in PCC 1,350.00
Park Road #3 Sprague to Reconstruct and widen to a standard three
Broadway lanc arterial strcct with curbs and sidewalks 47344-99
Pines Corridor ITS: Sprague to
16th Traffic Signal Control System for Corridor 755-09
Improvements to intersection (Dual land
SR27/Pines/16th Intercection Roundabout) 3,189:-99
University/Sprague Intersection Replace asphalt pavement with portland
RSS cement rete en+ 1,642.00
TOTAL - 76,877.00
Table 4.40 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2010 Through 2015(in $1,000)
Projects without Local Match within Existing Resources
Pro-ect Name Pro-ect Descri•tion Total Cost
32nd Avenue- Evergreen to Reconstruct and widen to three lanes with
Best curbs and sidewalks. 2,237.00
8th Avenue Phase 1-Carnahan Reconstruct 8th Ave.to a three-lane section
to Havana with curb 'utter sidewalks and bike lanes. 3 483.00
8th Avenue Phase 2- Park to Reconstruct 8th Ave.to a three-lane section
Dickey with curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes. 5,120.00
8th Avenue Phase 3- Dickey to Reconstruct 8th Ave. to a three-lane section
Carnahan with curb 'utter sidewalks and bike lanes. 4 667.00
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 68 of 71
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Appleway Extension- Evergreen Extend Appleway Blvd.with a multi-lane
to Tshirley facility including curbs and sidewalks. 13,219.00
Reconstruct to 3-lane roadway w/center
turn lane, sidewalks, curb&gutter and
Barker Road-8th to A..lewa stormwater 5 475.00
Barker Road-Spokane River to
Trent Reconstruct to a 2-lane curbed arterial 6,530.00
Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan
Intersections PCC Reconstruct intersections in PCC 1.556.00
Broadway Ave- Flora to Barker Reconstruct to 3-lanes, Flora to Barker 6,824.00_
Carnahan Truck Lane-8th to
City Limits, Add SB truck Lane to road 5,973.00
Euclid Ave/Flora Rd- Flora
Euclid to Euclid, Euclid Flora to Reconstruct to provide a 2-lane, shouldered
Barker arterial 5,408.00
Flora Road-Sprague to Mission Reconstruct&widen to 3-lane roadway 5,175.00
Kiernan &Sullivan PCC Reconstruct Intersection in PCC 1,350.00
Park Road-#3-Sprague to Reconstruct and widen to a standard three-
Broadway lane arterial street with curbs and sidewalks 4,244.00
Pines Corridor ITS: Sprague to
16th Traffic Si.nal Control S stem for Corridor 785.00
Improvements to intersection (Dual lane
SR27/Pines/16th Intersection Roundabout) 3,189.00
University/Sprague Intersection Replace asphalt pavement with portland
PCC cement concrete .avement. 1 642.00
TOTAL _ 76,877.00
Potential Annexation Areas/Urban Services
The Growth Management Act requires that counties designate urban growth areas (UGAs). The City of
Spokane Valley identified lands adjacent to the City within existing UGAs that would likely be developed
for urban uses and potentially be annexed to the City. In order to assess the need for capital facilities, the
City has identified existing service providers within the Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs). This
assessment should help identify the effects a potential annexation area will have on existing levels of
service.
Table 4.41 Existing Urban Service Providers within Potential Annexation Areas(PAAs)
PAAs Northwood Northeast East Southeast South Ponderosa Edgecliff
Domestic Water Pasadena Park Consolidated Consolidated Vera Vera S.C.W.D.No.3 East Spokane
Hutton Settlement Consolidated S.C.W.D.No 3
Fire&Emergency Services F.D.No 1&9 F.D.No.1 F.D.No 1 F.D.No.1&8 F.D.No.1&8 F.D.No 8 F.D.No.1&8
Law Enforcement Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County
Libraries S.C.Library Dist. S.C.Library Dist. S.C.Library Dist. S.C.Library Dist. S.C.Library Dist. S.C.Library Dist. S.C.Library Dist.
Parks&Open Space Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County
Public Schools W.V.S.D.&S.D.81 E.V.S.D C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. C.V.S.D. W.V.S.D.&S.D.81
Public Transit Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available Not available
Sanitary Sewer Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Not Sewered Spokane County
Solid Waste/Recycle Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt. Waste Mgmt.
Storm water Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County
Street Cleaning Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County
Transportation Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County Spokane County
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 04-27-2010) Chapter 4 -Capital Facilities
Page 69 of 71