The URL can be used to link to this page

2011, 12-06 Study Session AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION FORMAT Tuesday,December 6, 2011 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11707 East Sprague Avenue,First Floor (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL CALL TO ORDER Oath of Office Administered to Chuck Hafner and Arne Woodard Chris Bainbridge ACTION ITEMS: 1.Mark Calhoun Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-019 Approve Ordinance Amending 2011 Budget [public comment] 2.Mike Basinger Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-021 Approve Ordinance CTA 04-11,Recycling Facility [public comment] 3. Cary Driskell First Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-022 Advance to 2nd Reading Maximum Penalty,Gross Misdemeanor [public comment] 4.Kelly Konkright Quit Claim Deed,Brown's Park Motion Consideration [public comment] 5. Steve Worley Grant Agreements for Mansfield Ave. Connection Motion Consideration Project and Sprague Ave. Reconstruction Project [public comment] NON-ACTION ITEMS: 6.Mike Stone Gateway Signs Discussion/Information 7.Mark Calhoun Capital Projects List Discussion/Information 8.Neil Kersten Street Maintenance Contract Renewal Discussion/Information 9.Neil Kersten Sweeping Contract Renewal Discussion/Information 10.Morgan Koudelka Law Enforcement Interlocal Discussion/Information 11. Rick VanLeuven Police Department Accreditation Discussion/Information 12.Mayor Towey Advance Agenda Discussion/Information 13.Mayor Towey Council Check-in Discussion/Information 14.Mike Jackson City Manager Comments Discussion/Information ADJOURN Note: Unless otherwise noted above,there will be no public comments at Council Study Sessions. However, Council always reserves the right to request information from the public and staff as appropriate. During meetings held by the City of Spokane Valley Council,the Council reserves the right to take"action"on any item listed or subsequently added to the agenda. The term"action" means to deliberate,discuss,review,consider,evaluate,or make a collective positive or negative decision. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments,please contact the City Clerk at(509)921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Study Session Agenda,December 6,2011 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 6, 2011 Department Director Approval: X Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑admin. report © pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance # 11-019 Amending the 2011 Budget. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State budget law. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: To date the Council has heard presentations on the 2011 Budget Amendment on three previous occasions including a Public Hearing held on October 25, 2011. Ordinance #11-019 was approved in its first reading on November 15, 2011. BACKGROUND: The City's 2011 Budget development process began in the early summer of 2010 and was ultimately adopted via Ordinance #10-022 on October 12, 2010 (14 months ago). At the time the budget was prepared it was done so with the best information we had available at the time but at this point we have the benefit of hindsight. The proposed 2011 Budget amendment presented in Ordinance # 11-019 amends the budget as adopted with Ordinance #10-022 and reflects those changes that have occurred through the normal course of operations and affects a number of funds. Revenues are amended upward a total of $2,812,681 across 7 funds and expenditures are amended upward $2,901,929 across 9 funds. Revenue Expenditure Fund Fund Increase Increase No. Name (Decrease) (Decrease) 001 General Fund 355,000 730,681 101 Street O&M 698,000 1,443,300 102 Arterial Street 0 58,019 302 Special Capital Projects 0 180,000 307 Capital Grants 150,000 150,129 308 Barker Bridge 150,000 150,000 309 Parks Capital Projects 0 (220,000) 311 Street Capital Improvements 2011+ 584,681 (500,000) 402 Stormwater 375,000 909,800 403 Aquifer Protection Area 500,000 0 2,812,681 2,901,929 OPTIONS: Options are to accept the proposed amendments in whole or in-part. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance #11-019 amending Ordinance #10-022 which adopted the 2011 Budget. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This action amends the estimated revenues and appropriations initially adopted for the 2011 Budget. In the case of increases in appropriations, there are adequate funds available to pay for these amendments. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun ATTACHMENTS: -Fund level line-item detail of revenues and expenditures. -Ordinance #11-019 P:IClerklAgendaPackets for Weblagendapacket 12-06-1111tem 1 RCA Ord 11-019.docx P:\CIerk\AgendaPackets for Weblagendapacket 12-06-111Ordinance 11-019 amend detail 2011 11 15 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 11/7/2011 2011 Budget Amendment Ordinance#11-019 Budget Amendment Requests Requested Account Descrip#Ion Justification . Amendment #001,. General Fund; Expenditures Interfund transfers out-#311 40% of fund balance greater than $26mm 584,681 Capital outlay Purchase building permit software 146,000 Total expenditures 730,681 Revenues Gambling tax revised estimate 175,000 Franchise fee/Business Registrations revised estimate 150,000 State shared revenues revised estimate 30,000 iTotal revenues 355,000< #4.0.. Street O&M Fund Expenditures, Interfund transfers out-#402 Pay for 1/2 of Shop facility with Storm 375,000 Capital outlay Snow plow acquisition 200,000 Capital outlay Grant financed projects 868,300 Total expenditures 1,443,300: Revenues EECB Grant Grant financed projects 443,000 CDB Grant Grant financed projects 88,800 Interfund transfers in -#402 Grant financed projects 159,800 Miscellaneous Avista Rebate on LED Replace Proj 6,400 /Total revenues _ 698;000 #102 ArteriarStreet-Fund, Expenditures lnterfund transfers out/Street O&M Close-out fund balance 58,019 Total expenditures 58;019 #302 ,S�ectalCapttal Projects Fund Expenditures Interfund transfers out-#307 Proj. #088 Broadway- Moore to Flora 30,000 Interfund transfers out-#308 Barker Bridge 150,000 Total expenditures 1:80 000:; Page 1 of 3 P:1Clerk\AgendaPackets for Weblagendapacket 12-06-111Ordinance 11-019 amend detail 2011 11 15 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 11/7/2011 2011 Budget Amendment Ordinance#11-019 Budget Amendment Requests Requested Account©escription Justification Amendment #307 Capital Grants;Fund Expenditures Capital outlay Proj. #088 Broadway-Moore to Flora 150,000 Miscellaneous close out fund 129 )1 otal;eXpenditu es 15fl;729` Revenues Grant proceeds Proj.#088 Broadway- Moore to Flora 120,000 Interfund transfers in -#302 Proj.#088 Broadway-Moore to Flora 30,000 Total revenues= 150,000 #308„ Barker"_Bridge Fund Expenditures Capital outlay Needed to complete project 150,000 Totat"expenditures 150,000, Revenues Interfund transfers in -#302 Needed to complete project 150,000 Total revenues = 15E1,000; #309 -Parks Capital=Projects Fund_, Expenditures Capital outlay $320k contingency not necessary (220,000) Total expenditures; . [220,000)1 #311 Street"Capital,improvements 2011+" expenditures Capital outlay Reappropriate to 2012 (500,000) Total expenditures [500,000) Revenues Interfund transfers in -#001 40% of fund balance greater than $26mm 584,681 Total revenues" 584,881 Page 2 of 3 P:\CIerk\AgendaPackets for Weblagendapacket 12-06-11\Ordinance 11-019 amend detail 2011 11 15 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 11/7/2011 2011 Budget Amendment Ordinance#11-019 Budget Amendment Requests Requested Account`Descrip#Ion .lustification Amendment:, #402 Stormwater Fund Expenditures Capital outlay Acquire and set-up shop facility 750,000 Interfund transfesr out-#101 Broadway Ave. resurfacing-sw element 159,800 (T_otal eXpendltu.res . �. 909;80.0 Revenues Interfund transfers in-#101 Pay for 1/2 of Shop facility from Street om 375,000 Total revenues %_ 375;©00.; #403 _Aqui#0.1=4otectiori Area . Revenues APA Fee collected by Spokane County 500,000 Total-revenues 500,000 1 Totals Aoross;all Funds Total revenues 2,812,681 Total expenditures 2,901,929 Page 3 of 3 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 11-019 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE 10-022 ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON,ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2011 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2011 APPROPRIATING FUNDS AND ESTABLISHING SALARY SCHEDULES FOR ESTABLISHED POSITIONS", AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS,the City Council passed Ordinance 10-022 on October 12, 2010,which adopted the 2011 annual budget; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the 2011 annual budget, it has become necessary to make changes by adding new revenue appropriations, amendments, and transferring funds in order to properly perform City functions, services and activities;and WHEREAS, the budget changes set forth in this Ordinance could not have been reasonably anticipated or known when the 2011 annual budget was passed by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the best interests of the City are served by amending the 2011 budget to reflect unanticipated revenue, expenditures, transfers and appropriating same as set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley,Washington do ordain as follows: Section 1. Amended Revenues and Appropriations. Ordinance No. 10-022 adopted a budget for the twelve months beginning January 1, 2011 and ending December 31, 2011. Each item, revenue, appropriation, and fund contained in Section 1 and 2 of Ordinance 10-022 is hereby amended as set forth in Attachment A,which is fully incorporated herein. Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley this day of December,2011. ATTEST: Thomas E.Towey,Mayor Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Approved as to form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 11-019 Amending 2011 Budget Page 1 of 2 3,076,201 58,019 Ordinance 11-019 Amending 2011 Budget CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 2011 Budget Amendment Ordinance Ordinance No.11-019 Fund No. Fund Title 001 General 101 Street O&M 102 Arterial Street Fund B e ginning Fund Balance Sources Uses Revenues Line-Item Adopted via Ord.10-022 27,461,703 103 Paths&Trails 105Hotel/Motel Tax 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 121 Service Level Stabilization 122 Winter Weather Reserve 123 City Facilities Repair&Replacement 204 Debt Service LTGO 03 301 Capital Projects 302 303 304 Mirabeau Projects 307 308 309 Parks Capital Projects 310 Civic Facilities Capital Projects 311 Street Capital Improvement 2011+ 402 403 501 502 Special Capital Projects Street Capital Projects Capital Grants Barker Bridge Reconstruction 48,186 36,472,125 4,887,000 0 8,000 Amendment Total Revenues 355,000 36,827,125 698,000 5,585,000 0 0 0 8,000 272,356 350,231 481,000 0 3,000 0 5,423,795 501,168 54,000 0 5,000 0 1,608,259 0 792.875 481,000 3,000 54,000 5,000 Total Source s 64,288,828 8,661,201 58,019 11/7/2011 Line-Item Adopted via Ord.10-022 56,186 36,925,086 5,383,327 0 20,000 753,356 500,000 353,231 0 5,477,795 0 506,168 505,000 419,000 0 419,000 2,027,259 685,000 0 685,000 685,000 415,000 0 415,000 1,207,875 2,333,084 73,456 415,000 0 8,437,307 0 44,302 415,000 8,437,307 0 685,000 1,013,598 2,748,084 1,021,069 8,510,763 8,437,037 0 0 0 44,302 129 0 55,000 150,000 0 150,000 Stormwater Management Aquifer Protection Area Equipment Rental&Replacement Risk Management Total of all Funds 205,000 150,000 205,129 55,000 150,000 0 1,249,365 _ 613,000 0 613,000 1,862,365 4,899,745 40,000 0 40,000 4,939,745 0 500,000 584,681 1,084,681 1,084,681 2,288,845 1,732,000 375,000 0 0 500,000 2,107,000 500,000 906,379 9,000 0 9,000 20,420 319,000 0 319,000 51,408,518 55,549,432 2,812,681 58,362,113 Appropriations Amendment Total Appropriations 730,681 37,655,767 1,443,300 6,826,627 58,019 I 58,019 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 Estimated Ending Fund Balance 26,633,061 1,834,574 0 36,186 500,000 253,356 0 353,231 0 5,477,795 505,000 1,168 0 0 0 685,000 0 1,013,598 180,000 0 1,201,069 2,027,259 0 194,277 8,437,307 0 0 150,129 150,000 1,547,015 73,456 44,302 205,129 150,000 0 0 1,959,036 (220,000) 1,739,036 2,000,000 0 2,000,000 500,000 (500,000) 0 4,395,845 500,000 2,249,645 0 915,379 209,000 339,420 319,000 109,770,631 61,781,798 909,800 0 123,329 2,939,745 1,084,681 3,159,445 0 1,236,400 500,000 0 209,100 706,379 0 319,000 20,420 2,901,929 64,683,997 45,086,634 IM J'H3VIIV CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 6, 2011 Department Director Approval: x Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-021 Amending Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On November 29, 2011, City Council voted to move Ordinance 11-021 to a second reading. BACKGROUND: The intent of the proposed privately initiated text amendment is to allow recycling facilities in Corridor Mixed Use (CMU), Community Commercial (C), and Regional Commercial (RC) zones. Currently, the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) permits recycling in the Light Industrial (LI) and Heavy Industrial (HI) zones in conjunction with solid waste transfer sites. The applicant proposes to amend the SVMC to add a Recycle Facility to Section 19.120 Permitted and Accessory Uses; Sections 19.60.050 B, 19.60.060 B, 19.060.080 B of the Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations; and Appendix A, Definitions. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on October 27th to accept public testimony and deliberate on the proposed amendment. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission voted 5-1 to recommend approval of the proposed amendment. An administrative report was provided to City Council on November 15, 2011 and on November 29, 2011 City Council voted to move Ordinance 11-021 to a second reading. OPTIONS: Approve Ordinance 11-021, with or without minor changes; or remand substantial changes back to the Planning Commission for a future scheduled public hearing. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance 11-021, amending Spokane Valley Municipal Code Title 19 and Appendix A, to allow recycling facilities in Corridor Mixed Use, Community Commercial, and Regional Commercial zones. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance 11-021, Staff Report, and Planning Commission Findings DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 11-021 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 19.120 PERMITTED AND ACCESSORY USES; SECTIONS 19.60.050B, 19.60.060B, 19.060.080B OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED USE REGULATIONS; APPENDIX A, DEFINITIONS,AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley (City) adopted the Uniform Development Code (UDC) pursuant to Ordinance 07-015,on September 25,2007;and WHEREAS,the UDC became effective on October 28,2007; and WHEREAS, after reviewing the Environmental Checklists, the City issued a Determination of Non- significance (DNS) for the proposals, published the DNS in the Valley News Herald, posted the DNS at City Hall,and at the main branch of the library,and mailed the DNS to all affected public agencies;and WHEREAS,the City provided a copy of the proposed amendment to Washington State Department of Commerce (DOC)initiating,a 60-day comment period pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, the amendment, as is set forth below, bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety and welfare and protection of the environment;and WHEREAS,on October 13,2011,the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed amendments;and WHEREAS, on October 27, 2011, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and received evidence,information,public testimony,a staff report and with a recommendation; and WHEREAS, on October 27, 2011, the Planning Commission deliberated and provided a recommendation; and WHEREAS, on November 15,2011,City Council reviewed the proposed amendments;and WHEREAS, on November 29, 2011, City Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendment. NOW THEREFORE,THE CITY COUNCIL SPECIFICALLY ORDAINS AS SET FORTH BELOW: Section One: SVMC Title 19 shall be amended as follows: 19.60.050C, Community Commercial district. A. The Community Commercial classification designates areas for retail, service and office establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods. Community Commercial areas should not be larger than 15 to 17 acres in size and should be located as business clusters rather than arterial strip commercial development. Community Commercial centers may be designated through the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan amendments or through subarea planning. Residences in conjunction with business and/or multifamily developments may be allowed with performance standards that ensure compatibility. Ordinance 11-021, Code Text Amendment, Recycling Facility Page 1 of 4 DRAFT B. Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations. 1. Indoor kennels, doggie day care facilities and kennels associated with veterinarian clinics; provided, that: a. There are no outside runs or areas; b. The structure(s) housing animals is adequately soundproof to meet the requirements of Chapter 173-60 WAC; c. One parking stall provided for every 10 animal confinement areas; and d. Compliance with noise standards for a commercial noise source as identified by WAC 173-60-040 has been demonstrated by the applicant. 2. Wind turbine support tower provided the provisions of SVMC 19.40.110 are met. 3. All storage in the C district shall be within an enclosed building; provided, that retail products which are for sale or rental may be displayed outdoors during business hours only, so long as the storage does not occur within any required front or flanking street yard or in any public street or right-of-way. Vehicles, machinery or other items normally displayed for sales purposes on an open lot may be so displayed. No inoperable or not currently licensed vehicles or remnants thereof shall be stored or displayed out of doors. 4. Recycling facility;provided that: a. All recyclable materials and equipment must be contained indoors; b. All activities must meet the noise requirements of SVMC 7.05.040L; c. When adjacent to an existing residential use or residential zone, screening in SVMC 22.70.030B shall be required; d. The site must have frontage on an existing arterial or state highway and access will be limited to such frontage; and e. No dangerous or hazardous materials as defined in SVMC Appendix A shall be recycled or processed on site. 19.60.060 RC,Regional Commercial district. A. The Regional Commercial designation allows a large range of commercial and business uses. Community design guidelines address design quality, mixed use, and the integration of auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. B. Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations. 1. Caretaker dwelling unit limited to custodial, maintenance, management or security of a commercial property. 2. All storage in the RC district shall be within an enclosed building or within an area screened by a Type I screen consistent with the provisions of SVMC 22.70.030; provided, that retail products which are for sale or rental may be displayed outdoors during business hours only, so long as the storage does not occur within any required front or flanking street yard or in any public street or right-of-way. Automobiles,recreational vehicles,machines and other items normally displayed for sales purposes on an open lot may be so displayed. 3. Indoor kennels, doggie day care facilities and kennels associated with veterinarian clinics; provided, that: Ordinance 11-021, Code Text Amendment, Recycling Facility Page 2 of 4 DRAFT a. There are no outside runs or areas; b. The structure(s) housing animals is adequately soundproof to meet the requirements of Chapter 173-060 WAC; c. One parking stall provided for every 10 animal confinement areas; and d. Compliance with noise standards for a commercial noise source as identified by WAC 173-60-040 has been demonstrated by the applicant. 4. Recycling facility;provided that: a. All recyclable materials and equipment must be contained indoors; b. All activities must meet the noise requirements of SVMC 7.05.040L; c. When adjacent to an existing residential use or residential zone, screening in SVMC 22.70.030B shall be required:, d. The site must have frontage on an existing arterial or state highway and access will be limited to such frontage; and e. No dangerous or hazardous materials as defined in SVMC Appendix A shall be recycled or processed on site. 19.60.080 CMU, Corridor Mixed Use district. A. The Corridor Mixed Use designation is intended to enhance travel options, encourage development of locally serving commercial/retail uses, higher density residential, lodging and offices along major transportation corridors. B. Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations. 1. The outdoor storage provisions contained in SVMC 19.60.050B3 shall apply to the CMU district. 2. Front and flanking street yard setbacks shall be 20 feet,except as otherwise provided. 3. Projects with residential components shall provide 210 square feet of open space per dwelling unit conforming to the requirements of SVMC 19.40.020E and eligible for reduction for improvements on the same basis; provided,that: a. The requirement does not apply to the development of less than 10 new dwelling units; and b. Additional open space is not required for residential development located within 1,300 feet of a public park. 4. Recycling facility; provided that: a. All recyclable materials and equipment must be contained indoors; b. All activities must meet the noise requirements of SVMC 7.05.040L; c. When adjacent to an existing residential use or residential zone, screening in SVMC 22.70.030B shall be required; d. The site must have frontage on an existing arterial or state highway and access will be limited to such frontage; and e. No dangerous or hazardous materials as defined in SVMC Appendix A shall be recycled or processed on site. Ordinance 11-021, Code Text Amendment, Recycling Facility Page 3 of 4 DRAFT SVMC Title 19.120 shall be amended as follows: PERMITTED AND ACCESSORY USES NAICS Schedule of Corridor Community Regional Light Heavy Permitted Uses Mixed Use Commercial Commercial Industrial Industrial Appendix 19-A 56292 Recycling Facility S S S P P Section Two: The following definition shall be added to Appendix A: Recycling Facility: A Facility that accepts recyclable materials and may perform some processing activities. The principle function is to separate and store materials that are ready for shipment to end-use markets, such as paper mills, aluminum smelters or plastic manufacturing plants. Processing activities may include baling. compacting, flattening,grinding,crushing,mechanical sorting,or cleaning. Section Three: All other provisions of SVMC Title 19 and Appendix A (Definitions) not specifically referenced hereto shall remain in full force and effect. Section Four: Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrases of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section,clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section Five: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after the publication of the Ordinance,or a summary thereof,occurs in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this 13th day of December,2011. Mayor,Thomas E.Towey ATTEST: City Clerk,Christine Bainbridge Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 11-021, Code Text Amendment, Recycling Facility Page 4 of 4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION SC1TYpokane STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE 400 Valley PLANNING COMMISSION CTA-04-11 RECYCLING FACILITY STAFF REPORT DATE:October 13, 2011 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: October 27, 2011, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: A privately initiated text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) to add a Recycle Facility to Section 19.120 Permitted and Accessory Uses; Sections 19.60.050 B, 19.60.060 B, 19.060.080 B of the Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations; and Appendix A, Definitions. This proposal is considered a non-project action under RCW 43.21C. PROPOSAL LOCATION:The proposal affects the entire City of Spokane Valley, Washington. APPLICANT: Dwight J. Hume, 9101 N Mt. View Lane, Spokane, WA 99218 APPROVAL CRITERIA: Title 17 (General Provisions) and Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the SVMC. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed text amendment to the SVMC. STAFF PLANNER: Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior Planner, Community Development Department BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. APPLICATION PROCESSING Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application procedures for the proposal. Application Submitted: September 2, 2011 Determination of Completeness: September 29, 2011 Issuance of an Optional Determination of Non-Significance (DNS): October 7, 2011 End of Appeal Period for DNS: November 4, 2011 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: October 7, 2011 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing: October 7, 2011 B. SUMMARY OF TEXT AMENDMENTS II. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA Findings: Pursuant to SVMC Title 21 (Environmental Controls), the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission Page 1 of 4 required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and SVMC Title 21 have been fulfilled by the applicant's submittal of the required SEPA Checklist, and the issuance of the City's threshold determination consisting of a DNS. III. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS A. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 17(GENERAL PROVISIONS)OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE Findings: SVMC Section 17.80.150(F) provides approval criteria that must be considered when the City amends the SVMC. 1. The proposed privately initiated text amendment is consistent with the general vision of the Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The principle purpose of the Comprehensive Plan is to provide goals and policies that guide development within the City of Spokane Valley based on the community's identified vision. Text amendments consistent with the goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan should assist in the implementation of City's overall vision. When considering text amendments and how they relate to the goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan it is important to examine all potentially relevant goals and policies, reconcile them, and then make a balanced decision consistent with overall vision. In this case, the Planning Commission must determine zoning districts that are most suitable for a recycling facility. The following goals and policies are generally related to the proposed amendment. A brief analysis is provided for Planning Commission consideration. TP-8.1: Use the City's transportation system and infrastructure to support desired land uses and development patterns. Analysis: The proposed amendment would limit truck traffic associated with a recycling facility to arterials and state highways. TP-8.2: Allow a variety of services within neighborhoods that are convenient to and meet the needs of neighborhood residents, decreasing the need for driving. Analysis: Allowing a recycling facility to be located in the suggested zones could provide residential neighborhoods convenient access to recycle reusable products. CFG-5: Promote the reduction, re-use and recycling of solid waste. Analysis: Allowing a recycling facility to be located in the suggested zones could promote recycling of reusable products. EDP-6.1: Encourage the retention, development and recruitment of environmentally friendly businesses. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission Page 2 of 4 Analysis: Recycling can conserve the consumption of resources, energy and space used in landfills. The proposed amendment would allow a recycling facility to be located in a broader spectrum of zoning classifications potentially promoting the reuse of recyclable products. Based on the preceding goals, policies and analysis, the proposed text amendment is consistent with the overall vision of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Staff Response: The proposed amendment would permit recycling facilities in the Community Commercial, Regional Commercial and Corridor Mixed Use zoning districts. Currently, the SVMC categorizes recycling with solid waste transfer stations permitted in the Light Industrial and Heavy Industrial districts. The applicant requests that recycling facilities be addressed separately as a facilities that accept recyclable materials where the principle function would be to separate and store materials for shipment to end-use markets. The amendment would require all operations to be conducted within an enclosed building where noise and liter could be controlled to ensure land use compatibility. The amendment further stipulates that there must be direct access to an existing arterial or state highway. The proposed amendment can provide convenient access to a recycling facility. The public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment would be ensured by regulations currently in place in the SVMC and would be furthered by the conditions stipulating that the recycling facility activities be conducted indoors and that direct access would be limited to arterials or state highways. Conclusion(s): The proposed privately initiated text amendment to the SVMC is consistent with the approval criteria contained in the SVMC. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division, after review and consideration of the proposed privately initiated text amendment and applicable approval criteria, recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of CTA-04-11. V. PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS The Planning Commission is required to adopt findings of fact (Sections 17.80.140 & 17.80.150)when recommending changes to the SVMC. At the conclusion of the hearing for the text amendment to the SVMC, the Planning Commission, by separate motion, should adopt findings of fact. Findings: Staff has prepared the following findings for the Planning Commission in the event there is concurrence with the recommended approval. SVMC Section 17.80.150(F) provides approval criteria that must be considered when the City amends the SVMC. Planning Commission Findings: 1. The Planning Commission finds the proposed privately initiated text amendment to be consistent with the applicable provisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan; Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission Page 3 of 4 The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted CWPP. The Planning Commission finds the following goals and policies to be consistent with the proposed amendment. a. CFG-5: Promote the reduction, re-use and recycling of solid waste. b. TP-8.1: Use the City's transportation system and infrastructure to support desired land uses and development patterns. c. TP-8.2: Allow a variety of services within neighborhoods that are convenient to and meet the needs of neighborhood residents, decreasing the need for driving. d. EDP-6.1: Encourage the retention, development and recruitment of environmentally friendly businesses. 2. The Planning Commission finds the proposed privately initiated text amendment to bear a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; The Planning Commission finds the proposed amendment will provide a definition for a recycling facility, specifically addressing the use and limiting the processing of materials to separation. In addition, supplemental regulations will ensure all recyclable materials and equipment are contained in indoors and access will be limited to an existing arterial or state highway. Zoning districts permitting a recycling facility will be required to meet the following supplemental regulations: a. All recyclable materials and equipment must be contained indoors. b. All activities must meet the noise requirements of SVMC 7.05.040(L). c. When adjacent to an existing residential use or residential zone screening in SVMC 22.70.030(B) shall be required. d. The site must have frontage on an existing arterial or state highway and access will be limited to such frontage. e. No dangerous or hazardous materials as defined in SVMC Appendix A shall be recycled or processed on site. Recommended Motion: The Planning Commission adopts the findings in the staff report and recommends approval of CTA-04-11, a text amendment to the SVMC, to add a Recycling Facility to Section 19.120 Permitted and Accessory Uses; Sections 19.60.050 B, 19.60.060 B, 19.060.080 B of the Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations; and Appendix A Definitions. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission Page 4 of 4 Nov 16 11 03:55p gall 509-924-3412 p.2 SCITY pliane 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106❑Spokane Valley WA 33206 Talley 509.921.1000 Fax:509.921.1008 Oci yhall@spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Mayor and City Council From: John Carroll,Chair-Spokane Valley Planning Commission Date: October 27,2011 Re: Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation: LTA-04-11 PROPOSAL The intent of the proposed privately initiated text amendment is to allow recycling facilities in Corridor Mixed Use (CMU),Community Commercial(C),and Regional Commercial(RC)zones. Currently,the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC)permits recycling in the Light Industrial(LI)and Heavy Industrial (Hi) zones in conjunction with solid waste transfer sites. The applicant proposes to amend the SVMC to add a Recycle Facility to Section 19.120 Permitted and Accessory Uses; Sections 19.60.050 B, 19.60.060 B,19.060.080 B of the Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations;and Appendix A, Definitions. The Planning Commission's findings and recommendation on CTA-04-11 are summarized below: FINDINGS 1. Notice for the proposed amendment was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald on October 7,2011, 2. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)an environmental checklist was required for the amendment. 3. Staff reviewed the environmental checklist and a threshold determination was made for the proposed amendment. An Optional Determination of Non-significance (DNS)was issued and published on October 7,2011. 4. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on October 27,2011,to consider the proposed amendment. After hearing public testimony,the Commission made a recommendation on CIA-04-11. Section 17.80.150(F)of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC)provides approval criteria that must be considered when the City amends the SVMC. Planning Commission Findings: 1. The Planning Commission finds the proposed privately initiated text amendment to be consistent with the applicable provisions of the Growth Management Act, Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP) and the City's Comprehensive Plan; 1 oft Nov 16 11 03:55p gall 509-924-3412 p.3 The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted CWPP, The Planning Commission finds the following goals and policies to be consistent with the proposed amendment. a. CFG-5: Promote the reduction, re-use and recycling of solid waste. b. TP-8.1: Use the City's transportation system and infrastructure to support desired land uses and development patterns. c. TP-8.2: Allow a variety of services within neighborhoods that are convenient to and meet the needs of neighborhood residents, decreasing the need for driving. d. EDP-6.1: Encourage the retention,development and recruitment of environmentally friendly businesses. 2. The Planning Commission finds the proposed amendment to bear a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; The Planning Commission finds the proposed amendment will provide a definition for a recycling facility, specifically addressing the use and limiting the processing of materials to separation. In addition,supplemental regulations will ensure all recyclable materials and equipment are contained in indoors and access will be limited to an existing arterial or state highway. Zoning districts permitting a recycling facility will be required to meet the following supplemental regulations: a, All recyclable materials and equipment must be contained indoors. b. All activities must meet the noise requirements of SVMC 7.05.040(L). c. When adjacent to an existing residential use or residential zone screening in SVMC 22.70.030(8) shall be required. d. The site must have frontage on an existing arterial or state highway and access will be limited to such frontage. e. No dangerous or hazardous materials as defined In SVMC Appendix A shall be recycled or processed on site. ADOPTION OF FINDINGS The Planning Commission is required to adopt findings of fact when recommending changes to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. At the conclusion of the hearing,the Planning Commission,by separate motion, adopted the findings of fact for CTA-04-11. Approved this 27th day of October,2011 ///4)(7 John Carroll,Chair City of Spokane Valley Planning Commission 1 I 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 6, 2011 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading - Proposed Ordinance 11-022 — Gross Misdemeanors, maximum penalty. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 9.92.020, SVMC 8.05.050A. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Administrative report on November 15, 2011. BACKGROUND: In 2011, the Legislature amended RCW 9.92.020 to state that the maximum term a person may serve as punishment by imprisonment in jail for a gross misdemeanor is up to 364 days. Previous to that amendment, it stated that the maximum term a person may serve was not more than one year. The amendment became effective July 22, 2011. SVMC 8.05.050A currently reflects the old requirement of RCW 9.92.020, and states that the maximum term a person may serve as punishment by imprisonment in jail for a gross misdemeanor is not more than one year. As such, Staff recommends this amendment be adopted in order to remain consistent with the amended version of RCW 9.92.020 to ensure compliance with State law. Staff views this as a housekeeping item. OPTIONS: 1) Proceed to a second reading; 2) Request that additional changes be made to the proposed Ordinance. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move that we advance Ordinance 11-022 relating to maximum penalty for a gross misdemeanor, to a second reading. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney; Kelly Konkright, Deputy City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance 11-022 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WASHINGTON,AMENDING SECTION 8.05.050A OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE MAXIMUM TERM A PERSON MAY SERVE AS PUNISHMENT BY IMPRISONMENT FOR A GROSS MISDEMEANOR; AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley previously adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 8.05.050A, which sets forth the maximum punishment for a person convicted of a gross misdemeanor;and WHEREAS,RCW 9.92.020 governs punishment for a gross misdemeanor at the state level; and WHEREAS, RCW 9.92.020 was amended in 2011 to state that the maximum term a person may serve as punishment by imprisonment in jail for a gross misdemeanor is up to 364 days;and WHEREAS, Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 8.05.050A states that the maximum term a person may serve as punishment by imprisonment in jail for a gross misdemeanor is not more than one year or by a fine in an amount not more than $5,000,or by both such imprisonment and fine;and WHEREAS, RCW 9.92.020 and Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 8.05.050A currently conflict; and WHEREAS,the existing provision should be amended to ensure compliance with State law. NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington ordains as follows: Section 1. Amending Spokane Valley Municipal Code 8.05.050A Regarding Maximum Penalty Upon Conviction For Gross Misdemeanor. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 8.05.050A is hereby amended as follows: A.Unless specifically provided otherwise, every person convicted of a gross misdemeanor, or a crime not otherwise classified, shall be punished by imprisonment in jail for a maximum term of up to 364 daysof not more thanone year, or by a fine in an amount of not more than $5,000, or by both such imprisonment and fine. Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Ordinance 11- Amending 8.05.050A Maximum Penalty,Gross Misdemeanor Page 1 of 2 DRAFT Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of the Ordinance Summary. Passed this day of December, 2011. Mayor, Thomas E. Towey ATTEST: City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 11- Amending 8.05.050A Maximum Penalty,Gross Misdemeanor Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 6, 2011 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA TITLE: Motion Consideraiton: Authorize Execution of Brown's Park Quitclaim Deed GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.11.010; 35A.11.020 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On November 29, 2011, staff presented this information to Council. Council placed the item on the December 6, 2011 agenda for a motion to authorize staff to execute the transfer of Brown's Park to the City. BACKGROUND: In 1977, Spokane County conveyed the southwest portion of Brown's Park (at the corner of Pines Road and 32nd Avenue) to the Spokane Valley Fire Department. The deed expressly states that the purpose of the transfer is for use as a fire station, and prohibits all other uses except parks and recreation. The deed also gave Spokane County (and the City as successor in interest) the right to use the property for parks and recreation purposes unless and until a fire station is built on the property. The Spokane Valley Fire Department built a fire station on 32nd Avenue, approximately one block from Brown's Park. No part of the Brown's Park lot is used as a fire station. The fire department does not plan to build a fire station on the Brown's Park lot in the future. Pursuant to the deed, the property must continue to be used for parks purposes. As successors in interest to Spokane County, the City can accept transfer of the title. On October 27, 2011, the fire department delivered a quitclaim deed to the City Clerk, signed by Chief Mike Thompson, transferring the property back to the City of Spokane Valley. It is the desired practice of the City Attorney's Office to obtain Council's acceptance of a deed transferring title to any non-right-of-way property to avoid unwanted land being transferred to the City. The cost of acquiring the southwest corner of Brown's Park would be minimal. The only known recurring costs to the City would be stormwater and aquifer protection area fees for the parcel, as the City pays on any property it owns. The City would also have to pay a one-time title recording fee to Spokane County Auditor's Office in the amount of$63. The City does not pay property taxes on its properties. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move that Council authorize staff to complete all tasks necessary to execute the transfer of the Spokane Valley Fire Department's interest in Brown's Park back to the City. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Kelly E. Konkright, Deputy City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: (1) 1977 Quit Claim Deed conveying property to Spokane Valley Fire Department; (2) Quit Claim Deed transferring subject property to City of Spokane Valley; and (3) aerial photograph of Brown's Park. �01: e,P l � PACk i9 1 fv1XWAOMMW • 11?;: a(A 7703240015 ,. & clime ?. � 'li111';9�'� 8 WIIIM ei,Cst`ILAPtAip,,s!rsl'Ci1;c, slwiihH401fli Y.t1;r11.. (� �< _. ,,x.30 QUIT CLAIM DEED ].016 GNU 31-d1; 99201 The GRANTOR, SPOKANE COUNTY.,fl a municipal corporation of the State of. Washington for and in consideration of .$10.00 and other further considerations conveys and quit claims to Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 the following described real estate,' situated. in the County of Spokane, State of Washington including any interest therein which Grantor may hereafter acquire: The south 180 feet of the west 180 feet of the south west 1/4 of the 'southwest 1/4 except for road rights-of- way, all located in Section 27, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W,M,, Spokane County, Washington SUBJECT to all easements, restrictions and reservations of record. It is expressly understood by the parties to this Deed. that this conveyance is further subject to the condition that the Grantor, Spokane County reserves the absolute and unrestricted right. to use the above described property for Spokane County Park and Recreation purposes until the Grantee, Spokane County Fire . Protection District No. 1 notifies the Grantor in writing that the Grantee will within six months from the date of notification construct a fire station on the above described property. The Grantor shall within 90 days of notification terminate any use conducted on said property. It is further understood by the parties to this Deed that this conveyance. is. further subject to the condition that should the Grantee. cease to use the property as a site for an active fire station, the Grantee may not thereafter use the property for any other purpose whatsoever other than for public park and recreation purposes. Any public park and recreation uses by. the Grantee shall not be in conflict nor be inconsistent with the use of any adjoining property owned by the Grantor. It is further understood by the parties to this Deed that this conveyance is further subject to the condition that the Grantor may use free of charge any parking facilities con- structed by the Grantee on the above property excepting those parking places specifically marked and designated for Fire Dis- trict vehicles only. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said municipal corporation has caused this instrument to be executed by its proper officers and its.-1Zrporp.-te seal to be hereunto affixed this //c/ day of Z-::—/:rd1,, u t7 1977. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 17„tt. E, rxoiso'6':vt OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON rt t il'n1.1IYl 5„D IiN/1 ✓ ! %f ' / .+ry 7 91'nt1 Ail wea '!Ai Sti ! ,.a 1ROO la t!014 - a r 1?t J �,., , • • When Recorded Mail To: City of Spokane Valley Attn: City Clerk 11707 East Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 QUIT CLAIM DEED GRANTOR: Spokane Valley Fire Department,fka Spokane County Fire Protection District#1 GRANTEE: City of Spokane Valley (Successors in Interest to Spokane County) LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Abbreviated): Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# ';. /. r.+ Reference Nos. of Documents Released or Assigned: The GRANTOR SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT, fka SPOKANE COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1, a municipal corporation, for valuable consideration mutually acknowledged by the parties, conveys and quit claims to the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY (SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST TO SPOKANE COUNTY), a municipal corporation, all of its interests in the following described real estate, situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washington including any interest therein which grantor may hereafter acquire: The south 180 feet of the west 180 feet of the southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 except for road rights-of-way, all located in Section 27, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M.,Spokane County, Washington. Subject to all easements,restrictions and reservations of record. Dated: l ', _ I ,2011. ,4 C.. Mike Thompson,Chief Consented to by the City of Spokane Valley this day of ,2011 Mike Jackson,City Manager STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ACKNOWLEDGMENT )ss. OF County of Spokane. ) MUNICIPAL CORPORATION I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that MIKE THOMPSON signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Chief of SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT, a municipal corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such corporation, for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument, r SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO ME before me on -A O --r 4 ,2011. • • Notary Public � . �. State of Washington • PATRICIA L.ANDERSEN MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Notary Public in and for the State of February 18, 2012 Washington,Residing in__ :•;sz• ' My appointment expires ; -s�r' • Parcel Information Page 1 of 3 SPOKANE Col. rY • WASHINGTON Parcel IiIIortliatloll Nevi Search J , Modify Search I [Sales Search Help Summary I Seg\Merge I NotcesSEvenls I Taxes I Parcel Photos I Sketch I Maps I Webplus I Web Viewer I Print Summary w/No Graphs All Data As Of: 10123!2014 Parcel Number: 45273.9036 ADVANCED MAP VIEWERS: SCIMAP 1� SIMPLIFIED MAP VIEWER: scour OWNER INFORMATION Owner/Name Address 4 Ad less City State Zip Country Ron, CITY OF SPOKANE 11707 E SPRAGUE AVE STE SPOKANE WA 99206 100 VALLEY 106 TAXPAYER INFORMATION j Address Role Taxpayer/Name Address 1 2 City State Zip Country o70 CITY OF SPOKANE 11707 E SPRAGUE AVE STE SPOKANE WA 99206 100 VALLEY 106 MORTGAGE INFORMATION SITE ADDRESS INFORMATION Parcel Address City Land Size Description Tax Tax Code Status Type Size Description Year Area Real 0 ADDRESS 67 09.00 Acre(s) 67 Service 2011 0144 Active UNKNOWN Governmental Assessor Description 27-25-44 S66OFT OF W594FT OF S1/2 OF SW114:EXC THEREFROM CO RDS APPRAISAL INFORMATION _j Contact Parcel Class Appraiser Your Appraisal Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Appraiser Appraiser Appraiser Date Code Name Desc Name Phone Click here COMM 67 Service- to send a SOUTH Governmental 84 question 11/6/2008 524526 OPORD VALLEY Rich 477-5910 to the COMME appraiser Assessed Value Tax Year Land Dwelling!Structure Current Use Land Taxable Personal Prop Total Value 2012 784,080 0 0 0 0 784,080 http:Uwebpadal/ParcelSuminary.aspx 10/24/201 1 Parcel Information Page 2 of 3 2011 784,080 0 0 0 0 784,080 2010 764,080 0 0 0 0 784,080 2009 294,030 0 0 0 0 294,030 2008 294,030 0 0 0 0 294,030 2007 294,030 0 0 0 0 294,030 2006 294,030 0 0 0 0 294,030 2005 294,030 0 0 0 0 294,030 TAX STATISTICS Levy Name Levy Rate 2010 Levy Rate 2011 Levy Type Tax 113 County General 1.1556 1.1951 Non-Voted 0144 County General Cons Futures 0.0427 0.0442 Non-Voted 0144 County Library General 0.4467 0.5000 Non-Voted 0144 Fire District 01 1.5000 1.5000 Non-Voted 0144 Spokane Valley 1.5101 1.5030 Non-Voted 0144 State School 2.0024 2.2410 Non-Voted 0144 Fire District 01 Special 1.6023 1.8573 Voted 0144 SD356 Cen Valley B&I 1.4799 1.5723 Voted 0144 5D356 Cen Valley General 2.8687 2.9185 Voted 0144 Totals: . 12.6086 13.1314 1 LEVY DISTRIBUTION 2011 1 1i 1.20 County General 9.10% 1ltttttti 0.04 County General Cons Futures 0.34 e • 1i 0.50 County Library General 3.81 - 1.50 Fire District 01 11.42 I 1 1.54 Spokane Valley 11.45°'. :2.24 State School 17.07 1.66 Fire District 01 Special 12.62 e Limit 1.57 50356 Cen Valley B81 11.97'/, , ... . .. !",,,: ' -2.92 50356 Cen Valley General 22.23 i There was no data found for TCA Rates chart. CHARACTERISTICS _ J Land Number Soil Id Acreage Sy Ft Frontage Depth Lot(s) Market Value Use Value 1 C015 0.00 392,040 0 0 0 784,080 0 UOM Field Book No Inspection Cycle Millage Rate Acre(s) 00207 RGE i 5 13.131398966841 l SALES INFORMATION J Sale Date Sale Price Sale Instrument Excise Number 01/05/2004 0.00 Government Transfer 200400556 01/0512004 0.00 Government Transfer 200400558 Cl.ck here to view past safes prior to 1659. PROPERTY TAXES Active Exemptions Government Property Tax Year Charge Type Annual Charges Remaining Charges Owing http://webpadal/ParcelSumanary.aspx 10/24/2011 • Parcel Information Page 3 of 3 1 2011 Aquifer Principal AQFL1 30.00 0.00 2011 Stormwater interest Spokane Valley 4.08 0.00 • 2011 Slormwater Principal Spokane Valley COM1 407.82 0.00 Sum 441.90 0.00 2010 Aquifer Principal AQFL1 30.00 0.00 2010 Stormwater Principal Spokane Valley COM1 407.82 0.00 Sum 437.82 0.00 2009 Aquifer Principal AQFL1 30.00 0.00 2009 Stormwater Principal Spokane Valley COM1 407.82 0.00 i Sum 437.82 0.00 I 2008 Aquifer Principal AQFL1 30.00 0.00 2008 Stormwater Interest Spokane Valley 12,23 0.00 • 2008 Stormwater Principal Spokane Valley COM1 407.82 0.00 Sum 450.05 0.00 Total 0.00 Spokane County Assessor's Office 1116 W.Broadway,Spokane,WA 99260 I Phone:509.477.3698 I Fax:509.477.3697 Hours:Monday-Thursday 8:30am-4:OOpm Friday 8:30am-1:00pm(excluding holidays) E-mail: assessoronspokanecounty.org Spokane County Treasurer's Office PO Box 199 Spokane,WA 99210-0199 I Phone:500.477.4713 I Fax:509.477.3674 -Hours:Monday-Thursday 8:30am-4:00pm Friday 8•30am-1:00pm(excluding holidays) IE-mail: Treasurera(�spokanecounlv.org_ htt p://webpadal/ParcelSummary.aspx 10/24/201 1 ,-. 1 r ., 1....F.-1.. (51 • 01:f to... I 1- ••:,?..,:,_.. is, .r.4!.v;d; 4 4 OM .-- -1-... .1 i . .., . --..-,..;:-..-7 . . •, .4...-.. _ I - - 1 9 i-. r74'. 1 1/11*'-,..: . ... ,.., -, . .. 1 V . . I it...) I : t • -. e• . • 1 a i. J i'd• .-...: I 14 . i 1 -- fir # L . • ... ...C....' •'IL i I 71 t I r il i j 'g -4 .1' si .,.. i • ...1 . ,i,. .... 4 ' r r• ...: .1/4.... . .. . . . • •. -_ . _AI r r ' Idr i ,_ - ,_ __ . i ' r 0 i • -. I 111111k •._. .. .. - I • iedk' 1 1, ,.-a • .. _-.■ __. . .. . . . . . ' ..... . . 41Pow l'IFIII , , Tile .... . .ii. •1:. _.,. . • r- • • . .. k . ... . i . :"Tir '-• ..__:. . — . . •:,. .._ 111 • • ,., . .._ . . _.._ . alt.. "maffria .. _. . . A. • q de •=01 -1. It i IP I. . ..,i : do. 41i.,-' , l•a'.- 1 3,i- • - ,•,' • - -. ,. . I ! A:1 ' . . .. N...ie..' .J :r•I 111' ...1.• 1, , .• -_ 11111tr •.I.',' .:': ' ... . • .,V...;,. • ' . •. ;. X . .■i.a' • I'T ..e-. - -- -- • ---- • .S..1- Wt......=e ram-41Iiiid i.: . IIIMaillr'.• •dr- _ _ __ _. _ i.... ..... - • e 1 .-..El - .1""""'d . .. - 7' . ". _ ... • sir .2 ... tlil •. ab , .••7..t i. i,- .... . . i di I. .:.• ; [ ._ r . .1% , • ... k ' 0- 1 -4 • r. I Lk- 'y. . •:i, • At . . ..17. 7 T ,17.i..„. , .-S i* -.,' . •.. ,• ._ -..... I - ••1 -. . . r I-da ' . ..1 .. I. ; V ' • ...,4,. ._-... , _ • f I ' 1:. ., :.... 1 ■ N• . -... .. — .....;.. I . ■m. i Jr • r 4 a olgoim ., . L. r ' - l'' ''• J II I- g 11...1 -AA . .... Itib ! guall. .. • ,..L, .... . . A. 0, IIIIML. 7. =. . . '.' ^ • ., -. . t iii r.••11115. : 'i 'T4. . . 1* . .. 1 — I t .. .. • 1 l' '•,!F" . . •••• . .:; • ^P• i - - --.- • . • :•1 1 .7 • . ■-■ • 14. I' IPI7 . .-- - r C4 7 .1116p1 i-5- 0.1 %j' — •• - ilitrr'-'114 ,_i. .., .-_,,i_ ._... ; ..., . fr.. ' 71.H.- .0" ......... . .. . . .. 11" . • . , • -• .. . .... . L . 01 ' i t Oil 4 'I.115 .., • , . .._ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 6, 2011 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA TITLE: Motion Consideration: TIB Grant Agreements: Sprague Avenue Reconstruction Project (#0115), and Mansfield Avenue Connection Project (#0156) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption of the 2012-2017 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) on June 28, 2011 (Resolution #11-005), which included these two projects; Informational RCA on 2011 TIB Call for Projects (FY2013) on July 5, 2011; Admin Report on 2011 TIB Call for Projects on July 19, 2011; Approval to move ahead with TIB Grant Applications on August 9, 2011; Approval to move ahead with Mansfield Ave Connection TIB Grant Application on August 23, 2011. BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley was successful in receiving TIB grants for the following two projects • Mansfield Avenue Connection Project - Urban Corridor Program (UCP) • Sprague Avenue Reconstruction Project - Urban Arterial Program (UAP) The Sprague Avenue Reconstruction Project was also selected as part of TIB's Rapid Action Selection program. This program requires that 1) the bid be advertised no later than March 19, 2012, and 2) Notice to Proceed is given to the successful Contractor no later than May 18, 2012. If these requirements are not met, grant funds will be automatically terminated. Therefore, work needs to begin immediately to finalize the plans and specifications. A public involvement process is also planned to receive comments from citizens and businesses that will be impacted by this project. TIB funding for the Mansfield Avenue Connection Project is for the construction phase of the project. Design and right-of-way funding was received previously through SRTC. This project will be designed in 2012 with an anticipated construction schedule of 2013. OPTIONS: 1) Authorize Mayor to sign TIB Fuel Tax Grant Distribution Agreements for both projects or 2) Provide additional direction to staff RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the Mayor to sign the TIB Fuel Tax Grant Distribution Agreement for the Mansfield Avenue Connection Project and the Sprague Avenue Reconstruction Project. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Below is the funding breakdown for each project. Mansfield Avenue Connection: Sprague Avenue Reconstruction: $887,500 Federal STP(U) $3,091,900 TIB $792,700 TIB $ 773,000 Spokane Valley $197,700 Developer $3,864,900 Total $ 98,900 Spokane Valley $1,976,800 Total According to the Finance Director, there are sufficient REET funds available for the city's portion of the local match for both of these projects. See attached REET Analysis. STAFF CONTACT: Steve Worley, Senior Capital Projects Engineer Neil Kersten, Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Correspondence from TIB: Fuel Tax Grant Distribution Agreements for Sullivan Road Reconstruction Project (Mansfield Ave Connection Project has same agreement); Analysis of REET Revenues Washington State Transportation Improvement Board Fuel Tax Grant Distribution Agreement LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley PROJECT NUMBER: 8-3-208(004)-1 PROJECT TITLE: Sprague Avenue PROJECT TERMINI: Evergreen Rd to Sullivan Rd 1.0 PURPOSE The Washington State Transportation Improvement Board (hereinafter referred to as "TIB") hereby grants funds for the project specified in the attached documents, and as may be subsequently amended, subject to the terms contained herein. It is the intent of the parties, TIB and the grant recipient, that this Agreement shall govern the use and distribution of the grant funds through all phases of the project. Accordingly, the project specific information shall be contained in the attachments hereto and incorporated herein, as the project progresses through each phase. This Agreement, together with the attachments hereto, the provisions of chapter 47.26 Revised Code of Washington, the provisions of title 479 Washington Administrative Code, and TIB Policies, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supercedes all previous written or oral agreements between the parties. 2.0 PARTIES TO AGREEMENT The parties to this Agreement are TIB, or its successor, and the grant recipient, or its successor, as specified in the attachments. 3.0 TERM OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall be effective upon execution by TIB and shall continue through completion of each phase of the project, unless terminated sooner as provided herein. 4.0 AMENDMENTS This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement of the parties. Such amendments shall not be binding unless they are in writing and signed by personnel authorized to bind each of the parties. 5.0 ASSIGNMENT The grant recipient shall not assign or transfer its rights, benefits, or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of TIB. The grant recipient is deemed to consent to assignment of this Agreement by TIB to a successor entity. Such consent shall not constitute a waiver of the grant recipient's other rights under this Agreement. 6.0 GOVERNANCE & VENUE This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the state of Washington and venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in the Superior Court for Thurston County. TIB Form 190-500 Page 1 of 3 Rev.2/14/2003 Washington State Transportation Improvement Board Fuel Tax Grant Distribution Agreement 7.0 TERMINATION 7.1 UNILATERAL TERMINATION Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days' prior written notice to the other party. If this Agreement is so terminated, the parties shall be liable only for performance rendered or costs incurred in accordance with the terms of this Agreement prior to the effective date of termination. 7.2 TERMINATION BY MUTUAL AGREEMENT Either party may terminate this contract in whole or in part, at any time, by mutual agreement with a 30 calendar day written notice from one party to the other. 7.3 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE In the event TIB determines the grant recipient has failed to comply with the conditions of this Agreement in a timely manner, TIB has the right to suspend or terminate this Agreement. TIB shall notify the grant recipient in writing of the need to take corrective action. If corrective action is not taken within 30 days, the Agreement may be terminated. TIB reserves the right to suspend all or part of the Agreement, withhold further payments, or prohibit the grant recipient from incurring additional obligations of funds during the investigation of the alleged compliance breach and pending corrective action by the grant recipient or a decision by TIB to terminate the Agreement. The grant recipient shall be liable for damages as authorized by law including, but not limited to, repayment of misused grant funds. The termination shall be deemed to be a Termination for Convenience if it is determined that the grant recipient: (1) was not at fault, or (2) failure to perform was outside of the grant recipient's control, fault or negligence. The rights and remedies of TIB provided in this Agreement are not exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law. 7.4 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE TIB may, by ten (10) days written notice, beginning on the second day after the mailing, terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, because federal or state funds are no longer available for the purpose of meeting TIB's obligations, or for any reason. If this Agreement is so terminated, TIB shall be liable only for payment required under this Agreement for performance rendered or costs incurred prior to the effective date of termination. 7.5 TERMINATION PROCEDURE Upon receipt of notice of termination, the grant recipient shall stop work and/or take such action as may be directed by TIB. TIB Form 190-500 Page 2 of 3 Rev.2/14/2003 Washington State Transportation Improvement Board Fuel Tax Grant Distribution Agreement 8.0 AVAILABILITY OF TIB FUNDS The availability of Transportation Improvement Board funds is a function of Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax collections and existing contractual obligations. The local agency shall submit timely progress billings as project costs are incurred to enable accurate budgeting and fund management. Failure to submit timely progress billings may result in delayed payments or the establishment of a payment schedule. Approved as to Form This 14th Day of February, 2003 Rob McKenna Attorney General By: Signature on file Elizabeth Lagerberg Assistant Attorney General Lead Agency Transportation Improvement Board Signature of Chairman/Mayor Date Executive Director Date Print Name Print Name TIB Form 190-500 Page 3 of 3 Rev.2/14/2003 4.4§hSO$ton s, "--1.---1 - . Washington State 40 fi Transportation Improvement Board I \'I l }= ?+lion rmp10.46 p 11 Nov 2 8 2011 I JCl By, ----_ TIB Members November 18, 2011 Mayor James Inch,Chair City of La Center Commissioner Mike Wiison,C hair Vice Mr. Neil Kersten Grays Harbor County Public Works Director Councilmember Jeanne Burbidge City of Spokane Valley City of Federal Way 11707 E Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 Todd Coleman,c,u,e. Port t of Van Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Council member Sam Crawford WhatcomCOUnty Dear Mr. Kersten: Kathleen Davis wsooT Congratulations! We are pleased to announce the selection of your project, Mansfield Mark E. Avenue, Pines Rd (SR 27)to 200' eta Houk Rd, TIB project number 9-E-208(003)-1. Counolmembe r4Vi'tarnGothmann,P.E. The total TIB funds for this project is $792,700. City or Spokane Valley 1 Secrelary Paula HarnmotA0Pi. Before any work is allowed on this project, you must: Paul Ingiosi • Verify the information on the Program Funding Status form, revise if necessary, Office of Financial Maeagenwnt and sign; s Commissioner GregPartch • Submit the section of your adopted Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan Whitman County listing this project; CiyofSam ahmuh • Sign both copies of the Fuel Tax Agreement; Heidi Stamm • Written confirmation of functional classification from FHWA; MS Public Affairs • Return the above items to TIB; Harold tyMetro Tguchi • You may incur reimburseable expenses only after you receive approval from King County Metro 7rans7 • TIB. p Y pp Steve Thomsen,P.E. 1 I B. Snohomish County John Vodoplch Cly of Bonney Lake In accordance with RCW 47.26.84, you must certify full funding by November 18, 2012 Jay Weber or the grant may be terminated. Grants may also be rescinded due to unreasonable County RoadAdmin(slneten Boa Si project delay as described in WAC 479-05-211. Ralph Wessels,P.E. Bicycle Alliance of Washington If you have questions, please contact Gloria Bennett, TIB Project Engineer, at (360) 586-1143 or e-mail GloriaBaTlB.wa.Qov, Sincerely, Stevan Gorcester S.. °—^��Executi ve Dineeior P.O.Box 40901 Olympia,WA 98504-0901 Phone:360.586-1140 Stevan Gorcester Fax:364.866.1165 www.tih.wa.gov Executive Director Enclosures Investing in your local community 1 �aon$ton sz, ., , 1111 2 06 Washington State Transportation Improvement Board '%,,IP°yew November 18, 2011 l TIB Members NOV 2g MayorJemesirish,Chair Mr. Neil Kersten 2Odgd g City of Le Center Cammuionerh4ikeWtson,Vce Public Works Director Gay_ Grays Harbor County 11707 E Sprague Valley Suite 106 ~ 4 Councilmernber Jeanne Burbidge City of Federal Way Spokane Valley,WA 99206 Todd Coleman,P.E. Port of Vancouver Dear Mr. Kersten: Councilrnemher Sam Crawford Malcom County Kathleen Davis Congratulations! We are pleased to announce the selection of your project,Sprague Avenue, WSDOT Evergreen Rd to Sullivan Rd,TIB project number 8-3-208(004)-1.The total TIB funds for this project Mark Freiberger,P.E. Clyofsedro-Woolley is$3,091,900. Counoinrember WIICam GOthnlann,P.E. Cfyof Spokane-Valley Your project was selected from the Supplemental Call as a Construction Ready project. As a Secretary Paula Hammond,P.E. result the following requirements must be met: WsDor • Project must be advertised no later than March 19, 2012. Paul Ingiosi Office of Frnanc at Manaenient • You must give the Contractor notice to proceed and file the notice with TIB no later than Commissioner Greg Ranch 5:00 p.m. May 18, 2012. Whitman County • Progress billings must begin promptly and be submitted regularly throughout project Laura Philpot Cray of Sammamish construction Heidi Stamm HSPublicAffairs The project grant is automatically terminated by TIB if the specified deadlines listed above are not Harold Taniguchi met. King County Metro Transit Steve Thomsen,P.E. Before any work is allowed on this project,you must: Snohomish County John Vadopich • Verify the information on the Program Funding Status form, revise if necessary, and sign; Ciyof Bonney Lake • Submit the section of your adopted Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan listing this Jay Weber project; County Road Administration Board Ralph Wessels,P.R. • Sign both copies of the Fuel Tax Agreement; Bicycle Alliance of Washington • Return the above items to TIB; • You may incur reimburseable expenses only after you receive approval from TIB. SlExecutive Director If you have questions, please contact Gloria Bennett,TIB Project Engineer, at (360)586-1143 or P.O.Box 40901 e-mail GloriaB @TlB.wa.gov. Olympia,WA 98544-4941 Phone:360-566-1140 Fax:350.586.1165 Sincerely, www.tib.wa.gov (-4 Stevan orcester Executive Director Enclosures Investing in your local community IMF 2:0j93 s > I \\5V-F52\Users\mcalhoun\Budgets\2012\REET available for capital CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Analysis of Real Estate Excise Tax(REET)Revenues and Scheduled Disbursements Estimated REET available on January 1 REET FB currently on hand (as of 11/22/2011) Estimated REET revenues remaining in Nov and Dec 2011 Estimated REET revenues Estimated capital expenditures (Engineers estimate) June 1 debt service payment on 2003 LTGO bonds December 1 debt service payment on 2003 LTGO bonds Estimated REET available on December 31, 2011 (1) Includes Sprague Avenue reconstruction (2) Includes Mansfield Avenue Connection Shaded areas reflect known`figures All other figures are esimates_ E2a11�� n/a 3,909,905 120,000 n/a (1,800,000) 0 (1447511)' 2,085,154 2,085,154 n/a n/a 950,000 (2,072,000) (1) (37;651) (147,651) 777,851 I 11/28/2011 777,851 n/a n/a 950,000 (204,000) (2) (35,451) (150,451) 1,337,949 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 6, 2011 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: West Entry Gateway Signage & Landscaping GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The City Council has reviewed several signage option concepts for potential entry signs. The Council asked that a citizen's survey be set up to solicit input from citizens on the various signage concepts. Recently the City Council narrowed the entry sign concepts to one and asked to have landscaped concepts for the west entry developed with costs. BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley has been in existence since 2003. There is a growing interest in establishing a City of Spokane Valley identity recognizable by our citizens. The City Council is interested in exploring potential signage options for a variety of City uses. The Parks & Recreation Department presented several signage concepts for the City Council's review and comments in July. Since then a citizen's survey was set up to allow citizens to vote for their favorite sign. Sign concepts have been narrowed by the City Council. Direction was given to develop signage/landscape concepts for the City's west entry. OPTIONS: Select entry development option OR provide additional direction to staff RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council Direction BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Once a development concept is selected there will be a budget impact cost to construct, install and maintain the sign. STAFF CONTACT: Michael D. Stone, Director of Parks and Recreation ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation *Wane do0Valley WEST ENTRY GATEWAY SIGNAGE DEVELOPMENT POKANE VALL Mir MT• LA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING WWWCOM SITE LOCATION AND CONDITIONS The site is between E Appleway and E Sprague directly off of the Sprague exit. The site is currently a vacant lot with weeds and sparse grass. There is currently no water service to the site. Water service is available off site from Spokane County Water District 3. Closest water available is located at the north east corner of the adjacent site at the Display House. SELECTED SIGN CONCEPT rroxitio irIP. t7rdlks Flifirrywf .; This one sided sign includes a Corten Steel panel mounted on wood beams, centered between cobblestone columns. Brushed aluminum letters would contrast with the dark Corten Steel to provide highly visible text. The city's logo would provide the text for this sign option and the steel reflects the form of the city's iconic logo. The cobblestone masonry columns reflect rock found in the region. The sign would be located in a planter bed with shrubs or grass around it. CONCEPT #1 SIGN, TURF & ORNAMENTAL PLANTINGS NO PARIONG- SIGN 10 S'THICK CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE CAP wRH 1.E OVERWWG 4%E STAINED OM AR SEALS WTT) DECORATNE WM/ERS co('n H8TLCL PANEL WRH— ALUMINUM LETTERING COMLESTONE COLLIMNS, COB9LE8 TO BE ROUND ORW rrE r MMUS.SUNRISE INC.OR APPROVED EQUAL DIRECTIONAL SI DIRECTIONAL SION APPLEWAY BOULEVARD - rA1 SPOKANE VALLEY WEST ENTRY-OPTION CJLLLCUTS 1..••• -1 WEST PROPERTY LINE NATIVE GRASS SEEP MIX AREA- TURF GRASS AREA 0 6'FLAT TOP MOW CURB. O PLANTER BED. 0 ®6 SIGN LOCATION- EXISTING SIDEWAL. EXISTING BUSINESSES SIGN TO BE RELOCATED IN THE FIELD AS DIRECTED. iL EXIST NO CURB CUT. V PROPOSED TT SIDEWALK 17 EXISTING EWE LANE. aoAe/ur• rid/ $ Gar i. ai1 ti I. \;III„ u SIGN DETAIL WALL „.I• ti}]r TIL CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION i. I. 74 07 I -,Adj.„,/ Jig r .„ This option includes dryland grass to the west of the mow curbing and turf grass east of the curbing with ornamental plantings. Cherry trees are located on the western half of the property. Both options have the opportunity for solar sign lighting. CONCEPT #1 COST ESTIMATE • Site Work • Sign • Landscaping • Utilities • Contract Documents • Construction Administration • Subtotal • Sales Tax 8.7% • 10% Contingency • Grand Total $19,802.86 $24,550.00 $24,772.70 $18,000.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 4,000.00 $94,624.76 $ 8,232.35 $10,285.71 $113,142.82 5 CONCEPT #2 SIGN, DRYLAND GRASS AND PLANTINGS 9'TIICNCA4T IN PLACE CONCRETE CAP w TH 1.9'OVERHPIIG NO PARKIN SIGN OS STAINED CEDAR BEAMS HTTN DECOIIATNE WASHERS CORTEN S-EEL PANEL WITH ALUMINUM LETTERING COBR.ESTCNECOWNNB. COBBLES•OBE ROJNO GRANITE W MINUS.9UNRTSE INC.OR APP ROVED EOUAL 0 APPLEWAY BOULEVARD DIRECTIONAL SIG SPOKANE VALLEY WEST ENTRY-OPTION 2 c.N LDUTs DIRECTIONAL SIG (0 WEST PROPERTY LINE. QEXTST1NO UNIMPROVED FIELD. 0 B"FLAT TOP MOW CURB. NATNE GRAS&AREA. aSIGN LOCATION AND PLANTER BED. PROPOSED B'CONCRETE SIDEWALK. O EXCSTNG SIDEWALK. QB E7CSTINO CONCRETE CURS CUT. OEXBTNG BUSINESSES SICH TO BE RELOCATED.RE-LOCATE IN 0 ECSTINO IMRE LANE. THE FIELD AS DIRECTED. L____J El ti(l11,.11ll' [� • 1:1 I IL.% ■. A 2.1• 4'4', F - ▪ SIGN DETAIL n CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION WALE WV•t• This option includes a small section of dryland grass and xeriscape shrubs with minimal irrigation. Beyond the mow curbing no improvements are made except for the addition of street trees. Solar sign lighting is an option. CONCEPT #2 COST ESTIMATE • Site Work • Sign • Landscaping • Utilities • Contract Documents • Contract Administration • Subtotal • Sales Tax 8.7% • 10% Contingency • Grand Total $17,998.84 $24,550.00 $ 6,640.50 $18,000.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 4,000.00 $74,689.34 $ 6,497.97 $ 8,118.31 $89,305.62 7 POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL COSTS • Electrical Service $3,000.00 • Electrical Lights $2,000.00 Permitting $1,000.00 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 6, 2011 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business [' public hearing [' information®admin. report [' pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Potential 2012 (and beyond) Capital Projects GOVERNING LEGISLATION: None. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council has discussed capital projects on a variety of occasions but to date no action has been taken on the projects addressed in this RCA. BACKGROUND: The City is continually faced with a multitude of potential capital projects but may address them with very limited financial resources including current year revenues, fund reserves built up from previous years, grants and bond issues. Potential sources of financing for projects include money in Funds 101, 311 and 403: Appropriated Amount in 2012 Sources of Financing for Projects: Available Budget? Fund#311 -Street Capital Improvements 2011+ 1,086,881 yes Fund#101 -Street O&M (for street preservation) 500,000 yes 1,586,881 Fund #403 -Aquifer Protection Area 1,000,000 no Another source of financing for capital acquisition or construction are real estate excise tax (REET) proceeds which we use as match money for street and park related capital projects. Noteworthy here is that the City will look to this source of financing for many future projects. A brief analysis of anticipated REET activity for the three year +eriod 2011 through 2013 follows: 2011 2012 2013 Estimated REET available on January 1 n/a 2,118,442 850,868 REET FB currently on hand (as of 1112212011) 3,909,905 n/a nla Estimated REET revenues remaining in Nov and Dec 2011 120,000 n/a n/a Estimated REET revenues n/a 950,000 950,000 Estimated capital expenditures (Engineers estimate) (1,766,712) (2,032,271) (1) (104,723) June 1 debt service payment on 2003 LTGO bonds 0 (37,651) (35,451) December 1 debt service payment on 2003 LTGO bonds (144,751) (147,651) (150.451) Estimated REET available on December 31, 2011 2,118,442 850,868 1,510,243 (1) Includes$800,000 for Sprague Avenue-Evergreen to Sullivan reconstruction and$98,000 for the Mansfield Avenue Connection. Shaded areas reflect known figures. All other figures are estimates. 11 SV-FS24UserslmcalhountBudgets1201212011 12 06 RCA potential capital projects,docx Capital projects discussed during 2011 have included: Discussed at Estimated 6/14/2011 Potential Capital Projects Cost Council Retreat West Gateway at Thierman 120,000 yes Mission Avenue Trailhead 150,000 yes Railroad Quiet Zones 1,500,000 yes Appleway Landscaping - Park to University 640,000 yes Street Preservation (arterials only) PER YEAR 4,750,000 (1) yes Old Milwaukee Trail 3,500,000 (2) no University /Appleway Landscaping 100,000 yes Sullivan Street Bridge -estimated City share?? 2,000,000 no Sullivan Street Bridge -Temporary Repairs 360,000 no 13,120,000 Sprague Swale Upgrade 630,000 yes (1) Cost for local streets yet to be determined (2) Cost of Old Milwaukee Trail is based on the cost per mile for the Spokane Valley/Millvtivod and Greenacres trail projects. Cost may vary according to the type of surfacing, Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail Complete Project 860,000 no Phase 1 - Community College to Argonne & Millwood 430,000 no From the above project list: • The $360,000 needed for temporary repairs of the Sullivan Street Bridge is scheduled to be paid from the $1,086,881 appropriated in Fund #311 — Street Capital Improvements 2011+, which leaves just $726,881 remaining to address other capital needs. • The $630,000 needed for Sprague Swale Upgrades can be accommodated with the $1,000,000 of Aquifer Protection Area money we anticipate we'll receive from Spokane County over the two year period 2011 and 2012. This would leave $370,000 remaining to address future aquifer protection projects. OPTIONS: Provide staff with a consensus of capital projects you would like to see amended into the 2012 Budget and the specific resources that should be used to finance them. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None at this time. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Depending upon Council's direction this could lead to an amendment to the 2012 Budget in a variety of funds. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun ATTACHMENTS: • Dot exercise from the June 14, 2011 Council Retreat. • REET Expense Projection maintained by Finance that is based upon engineers projections. \ISV-FS2lUserslmca lhoun4Budgets1201212011 12 06 RCA potential capital projects.docx • Prioritization of Capital Projects Discussed at June 14, 2011 Council Retreat TIP planned projects and/or projects currently without funding Vote: New Projects West gateway at Thierman $120,000 Vote: •O b) Mission Ave. Trailhead $150,000 Vote: i �) University 1 Appleway Landscaping $100,000 Vote: • Design Park RoadNista Rd Quiet Zone Vote: • 3. Street Preservation Vote 4. None— Don't spend these Vote: 5 Appleway Landscaping — Park to University Vote: 0 0) r Sprague Swale Landscaping Vote: * Q() 0 Highest Priority Second Priority 1113012011 11SV-FS21Userslmcalhounl8udgets1201242011 12 06 RCA potential capital projects.docx REET Exp. Projection Projecttt Project Name 2011 2012 2013 2014 TOTAL 0003 1 Barker Road Bridge Replacement REET 778,175 - 778,175 0005 2 Pines/Manfield,Wilbur Rd to Pines REET - 463,312 - - 463,312 0054 3 44th Ave Pathway-Woodruff Rd to Sands Rd REET 16,803 - 16,803 0069 4 Park Rd Recon.#2 Brdwy&Ind.SRTC06-12 REET 14,568 - - 14,568 0088 5 Broadway Ave.Moore to Flora REET (54,265) - (54,265) 0106 6 West Pondersoa(STEP) REET - 0060 7 Argonne Road Corridor Upgrade{SRTC 06-3 REET 123,821 46,540 673 - 171,034 0061 8 Pines(SR27)ITS Improvements(SRTC 06-2 REET 42,172 238,437 - 280,609 0063 9 Broadway Avenue Safety Project,Pines RD REET 168,777 - - - 168,777 0065 10 Sullivan/Sprague PCC Intersection REET 616 - 616 0076 11 Valley Mission Park REEF - - - 0112 12 Indiana Ave Extension REEF 290,361 - - 290,361 0113 13 Indiana/Sullivan PCC Intersection REET 231,279 - 231,279 0115 14 Sprague Ave Reconstruct-E'grn to S'van REET 18,000 800,000 - 818,000 0123 15 Mission Ave-Flora to Barker REEF 48,943 20,132 - 69,075 0139 23 Park Road RR Crossing Safety Improvement REET - 0142 25 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan REET 18,650 18,651 - - 37,301 0141 27 Sullivan&Euclid PCC REET 20,111 3,549 - - 23,660 0146 29 24th Ave Sidewalk Adams to Sullivan REET 7,000 144,600 - - 151,600 0149 32 Sidewalk lnSII RE ET 79,050 64,050 - 143,100 0155 37 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement#4508 REEF 40,000 120,000 40,000 - 200,000 0156 38 Mansfield Ave Connection REEF 1,701 98,000 - - 99,701 1,766,712 2,032,271 104,723 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 6, 2011 Department Director Approval Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Street and Stormwater Maintenance Contract Renewal PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Street and Stormwater Maintenance Contract Approval on April 24, 2007, Contract Renewal in 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011. BACKGROUND: The City conducted a RFP process in March 2007. In April 2007, the Council awarded the contract to Poe Asphalt Paving by the following motion: 4. Motion Consideration: Contract Approval for Street and Stormwater maintenance and Repair — Neil Kersten. It was moved by Counciluiember Munson and seconded to award the contract to Poe Asphalt Paring in an amount not to exceed 51,175,119, and authorize the City Manager or designee to sign the contract and future seven-year reneii able options as provided in the RFP documents. Public Works Director Kersten explained that there have been no changes since this was last discussed before Council. Deputy Mayor Taylor invited public comments: no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In favor: Unanimous. Opposed.None. Abstentions:None. Motion carried. The contract was for one year with seven one-year renewal options which may be exercised by the City. Poe Asphalt Paving provided an excellent level of service during 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011. The contract amount for Street and Stormwater Maintenance in 2011 was $1,545,119 and will remain at $1,545,119 for 2012 for those services. In 2010 Council approved a snow removal contract to Poe Asphalt Inc. in the amount of $700,000. We were able to complete a separate bid process last year for the majority of the snow plowing work involving graders and have conducted the same bid process this year. As a result, last year we only spent $132,291 with Poe which was primarily for drivers in the City snow plow trucks and two graders with wings. Additionally, since snow plowing is not considered a public work the hourly rates for snow plowing will be at 90% of the contract rate. We are requesting an increase in the contract amount of $140,000 for the snow removal operations which would come from the approved snow removal budget. This would bring Poe's total contract amount to $1,685,119. This does not increase the overall Street Fund budget for 2012. State wage rates went up $1/hour and General Liability Insurance and Washington Workers Compensation went up 1.1%. The average labor rates increased by 2.6%, equipment rates remain the same and Asphalt costs were reduced by 12.1%. Based on last year's work quantities this will reduce Poe's 2012 contract costs by 6.4%. OPTIONS: Place the contract on the December 13 meeting as a Motion Consideration, or provide staff with further direction. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The contract will be funded by the approved 2012 budget. STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten ATTACHMENTS: 2011 draft contact renewal letter, Poe Direct Rates Spokane Valley N 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 • Fax: 509.921.1008 • cityhall@spokanevalley.org December XX, 2011 Poe Asphalt Paving, Inc. 2732 N Beck Road Post Falls, ID 83854 Re: Implementation of 2012 option year, Contract No. 09-003,for Agreement for Street and Stormwater Maintenance and Repair Services, No. 07-008, executed March 13, 2007 Dear Mr. Griffith: The City executed a contract for provision of Street and Stormwater Maintenance and Repair Services on May 11, 2007. The Request for Proposal states that it was for one year, with 7 optional one year terms possible if the parties mutually agree to exercise the options each year. The City would like to exercise the 2012 option year of the Agreement. The Compensation as outline in Exhibit A, 2012 Cost Proposal, includes the increases you requested and shall not exceed $1,685,119. This is the fifth of seven possible option years that can be exercised, and runs through December 31, 2012. Exhibit"A"—2012 Cost Proposal All of the other contract provisions contained in the original agreement are in place and will remain unchanged in exercising this option year. If you are in agreement with exercising the 2012 option year, please sign below to acknowledge the receipt and concurrence to perform the 2012 option year. Please return two (2) copies to the City for execution. A fully executed original copy will be mailed to you for your files. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Poe Asphalt Paving, Inc. Name and title Name and title Date signed Date signed EXHIBIT"A" 2012 Cost Proposal 2012 2011 % Increase Street Maintenance Labor Hourly Overtime Hourly Overtime Hourly Overtime Superintendent $48.77 $48.77 $51.58 $51.58 -5.4% -5.4% Foreman $48.77 $62.92 $44.70 $60.23 9.1% 4.5% Operator $45.64 $59.04 $43.86 $58.99 4.1% 0.1% Teamster $43.00 $54.69 $41.28 $54.53 4.2% 0.3% Laborer $39.05 $50.88 $38.62 $51.94 1.1% -2.0% Ave. Increase 2.6% -0.5% 2012 2011 % Increase Snow Operations-90%Wages Labor Hourly Overtime Hourly Overtime Hourly Overtime Superintendent $45.22 $45.22 $51.58 $51.58 -12.3% -12.3% Foreman $45.22 $57.95 $41.28 $55.11 9.5% 5.2% Operator $42.28 $54.34 $39.29 $52.75 7.6% 3.0% Teamster $40.07 $50.59 $38.63 $50.55 3.7% 0.1% Laborer $36.09 $46.74 $36.49 $48.75 -1.1% -4.1% Ave. Inc 1.5% -1.6% 2012 2011 Costs Costs %Increase $60.72 $60.72 0.00% $60.72 $60.72 0.00% $60.72 $60,72 0.00% $60.72 $60.72 0,00% • $60.72 $60.72 0,00% $60.72 $60.72 0.00% 1 $81.47 $81.47 0.00% $81.47 $81.47 0.00% $81,47 $81.47 0.00% $81.47 $81.47 0.00% o 0 0 $81.47 $81.47 0.00% on °o 000 $45.03 $45.03 0.00% cii a, 0 0 0 $60.72 $60.72 0.00% ' $45.03 $45.03 0.00% ci 0 0 0 e $ 39.47 $39.47 0.00% , 61 C,; cn � c•1 $16,19 $16.19 0.00% N 4. o $16.19 $16.19 0.00% u u $27.07 $27.07 0.00% $27.07 $27.07 0,00% • $27.07 $27.07 0.00% $37.44 $37.44 0.00% 0 0 $21.25 $21.25 0.00% N m o cn N o0 $21,25 $21.25 0.00% ®�I-I v N3 a $21.25 $21.25 0.00% V $21.25 $21.25 0,00% a O $21.25 $21.25 0.00% * * ,LI 4. $26.57 $26.57 0.00% U N '1 N 14 a $15.94 $15.94 0.00% in un @) $15.94 $15.94 0.00% U Q , p $15.94 $15.94 0.00% o 0 0 $55.15 $55.15 0.00% 73 73 5 C a tto $44.78 $44.78 0.00% °O ;''0 as $44.78 0 $44.78 0.00% o o a $65.78 $65.78 0.00% t 0 9 C �.n o 7 o o f' $79 .95 $79.95 0.00% Ln N tn E $86.02 $86.02 0.00% N N co co °, $177.10 $177.10 0.00% h 1G a 0 c 0 $50.60 $50.60 0.00% w a. °- a u . ° v $55.66 $55.66 0.00% 2 g > - �n p - $86.53 $86.53 0.00% , $55.66 $55.66 0.00% $16.19 $16.19 0.00% $5.36 $5.36 0.00% $26.57 $26.57 0.00% , CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 6, 2010 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Street Sweeping Contract Renewal GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Street Sweeping Contract Approval on March 3, 2007 and Contract Renewal in 2008, 2009, 2010. BACKGROUND: The City conducted an RFP process in February 2007. In March 2007 the Council awarded the contract to AAA Sweeping by the following motion: NEW BUSINESS 2. Motion Consideration: Street Sweeping Request for Proposals—John Hohman Engineer Holman explained that this issue was previously presented to Council November 14 and February 20; and that staff now seeks approval of the contract to AAA Sweeping in an amount not to exceed$473.687. It was moved by Counncilmember Denennv and.seconded to award the contract to AAA Sweeping in an amount not to exceed$473,687 and authorize the City Manager to sign the contract and future .seven-year renewal options as provided in the RFP documents. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment: no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation. In Fcnor: Unanimous. Opposed. None. Abstentions:None. Motion carried. The contract was for one year with seven one-year renewal options which may be exercised by the City. AAA Sweeping provided a good level of service during 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011. In 2011 the total approved contract amount was $490,199.94. The contract amount will remain at the same amount for 2012. AAA Sweeping has requested a 2% increase in their unit prices. The current CPI-U as of October is 3.5%. I recommend that we renew the contract for 2011. OPTIONS Place the contract on the December 13 meeting as a Motion Consideration, or provide staff with further direction. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The contract will be funded by the 2012 approved budget. STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten ATTACHMENTS 2012 DRAFT contact renewal letter. S1kiIe Valle 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 • Fax: 509.921.1008 • cityhall@spokanevalley.org December XX, 2011 AAA Sweeping, LLC P 0 Box 624 Veradale,WA 99037 Re: Implementation of 2012 option year,for Agreement for Street Sweeping Services, No. 07- 001, executed March 13, 2007 Dear Mr. Sargent: The City executed a contract for provision of Street Sweeping services on March 13, 2007. The Request for Proposal states that it was for one year, with 7 optional one year terms possible if the parties mutually agree to exercise the options each year. The City would like to exercise the 2012 option year of the Agreement. The Compensation as outlined in Exhibit A, 2011 Unit Cost Proposal, shall not exceed$490,199.94. This is the fifth of seven possible option years that can be exercised, and runs from January 1 through December 31, 2012. Exhibit"A"—2012 Cost Proposal All of the other contract provisions contained in the original agreement are in place and will remain unchanged in exercising this option year. Please sign below to acknowledge the receipt and concurrence to perform the 2012 option year. Please return two (2) copies to the City for execution. A fully executed original copy will be mailed to you for your files. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY AAA Sweeping, LLC Name and title Name and title Date signed Date signed Exhibit A 2012 SWEEPING CONTRACT UNIT RATES ITEM DESCRIPTION 2011 2012 Proposed 2012 UNIT PRICE Increase (2%) UNIT COST 1 Mechanical Sweeper $147.27 $2.95 $150.22 2 Kick/Angle Brooms $107.85 $2.16 $110.01 3 Regenerative Air Sweeper $147.27 $2.95 $150.22 4 Water Truck $109.46 $2.19 $111.65 5 Dump Truck/ End Truck $109.46 $2.19 $111.65 6 Loader $107.85 $2.16 $110.01 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 6, 2011 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Law Enforcement Interlocal - Amendments GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Interlocal Agreement C010-109 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Interlocal Agreement C010-109 approved by Council on August 10, 2010 BACKGROUND: The Intelligence Led Policing position has been performed by a deputy who is no longer available. There are no current deputies qualified for this position and the skills necessary for this position are not typically possessed by a deputy. Chief VanLeuven and Sheriff Knezovich recommend this position be filled by a detective/corporal. Additionally, the legal department recommends that the Council formally approve all previous changes to the Commissioned Officer Worksheet and the Exhibit 1 List of Services. These changes were previously presented to Council but formal action was not taken. OPTIONS: At a future meeting, consider approving changes as presented, request additional information, or take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A (Proceed to Motion Consideration on December 13.) BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: $4,500 additional cost for change to Intelligence Led Policing position. STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst ATTACHMENTS: Information Memo, Commissioned Officer Worksheets, Exhibit 1 Spokane Valley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 • Fax: 509.921.1008 • cityhall@spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Mike Jackson, City Manager Mayor Towey and Members of Council From: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst Date: December 6, 2011 Re: Amendments to Law Enforcement Interlocal Agreement Introduction The current Law Enforcement Interlocal Agreement was adopted and executed in August of 2010. Since that time several position adjustments have been made according to the terms of the agreement. Recently the legal department conducted a review of this agreement and recommended that such changes be approved by Council. The basis of this recommendation is the Revised Code of Washington chapter 39.34.080 that provides the power to enter into and amend interlocal agreements for service solely to the governing body, which in the case of the City of Spokane Valley is the City Council. At this time we are presenting all changes to the positions and services to Council for discussion and to schedule a revised Interlocal for formal motion consideration. These items have been previously presented to Council in the form of informational items and administrative reports. Also at this time we present a new request being made by Police Chief Rick Van Leuven and the Spokane County Sheriff's Office. This request is contained at the end of this memorandum. Summary of Changes to Positions and Services It is important to note that there is zero net change to the Dedicated FTE numbers assigned to the City of Spokane Valley. This adheres to the Council directive of no reduction in force for the City of Spokane Valley. Category 1 (Dedicated FTEs) Admin +.25 Lieutenant: This position was approved by Council in 2010. As this position only served nine months during 2010 the original commissioned officer worksheet only contained .75 full- time equivalent (FTE)for this position. That has now been updated to a full 1.0 FTE. Changes to Law Enforcement Interlocal Agreement December 6,2011 Page 2 of 3 Category 2 (Shared Investigative Services) Major Crimes +1 Detective: Transferred from Sex Crimes to meet increased Major Crime workload. Sex Crimes -1 Detective: Transferred to Major Crimes. +1 Deputy: Formerly funded by Child Sex Predator Grant (Category 4). Grant funding. eliminated but position retained and funded by taking a deputy position from gang enforcement. Investigative Task Force (New unit combining Property Crimes Task Force and Investigative Services Unit(ISU)) -.75 Lieutenant: Position not changed but .75 of position is now funded by Federal Seizures (Cat. 4). -1 Detective: Transferred to Office of Professional Standards (OPS) in Category 3. -3 Deputies: Eliminated due to consolidation of units. CIU/DEC/JTTF/Meth%/DTF% (ISU removed,now part of Investigative Task Force) -1 Sergeant: Eliminated due to consolidation of ISU and Property Crimes Task Force. -2 Deputies: Eliminated due to consolidation of ISU and Property Crimes Task Force. Gang Enforcement -1 Deputy: Transferred to Sex Crimes Summary of Changes: Loss of 7.75 officers. No identified change to service due to consolidation of units and shifting of resources according to demand for service. Effect of changes will be tracked through performance measures. Costs to City were reduced approximately $519,000. Category 3 (Administrative Support Commissioned Officers) Command Staff -1 Undersheriff: Eliminated to fund Business Operations Director PIO (Public Information Officer) -1 Sergeant: Officer transferred to Training/OPS; PIO duties now shared by 3 officers with other FT duties. Training/OPS +1 Sergeant: Transferred from PIO +1 Detective: Transferred from Investigative Task Force Summary of Changes: No net change to officers in Category 3 but an added civilian position of the Business Operations Director adds approximately $75,000 in support costs. No identified change to service level. Changes to Law Enforcement Interlocal Agreement December 6,2011 Page 3 of 3 Category 4 (County Responsibility or Other Cost Recovery Method) DEA (Drug Enforcement-Unit eliminated) -1 Detective/Corp: Grant funding eliminated ISU Federal Seizures (New Unit) +.75 Lieutenant: Funding transferred from Category 2; duties are unchanged (Investigative). +.67 Detective/Corp: Funding transferred from WA Meth Grant(Cat. 4); duties unchanged. WA Meth Grant (Unit eliminated) -.67 Detective Corp: Grant funding eliminated but duties retained through Federal Seizures. Child Sex Pred Grant (Unit eliminated) -1 Deputy: Grant funding eliminated but duties retained and transferred to Cat. 2 Sex Crimes Unit. Summary of changes: Reduction of 1.25 officers. All services retained through other funding except DEA. Category 2 (NEW CHANGE) Intelligence Led Policing Change from Deputy to Detective/Corp Summary provided by Police Chief Rick VanLeuven: Currently we have an open position in Category II under the Intelligence-Led Deputy. The deputy who previously held that position had extensive education and training that greatly suited him to perform those duties. Now that this position is vacated, we realize that the job tasks associated with this position should be that of a detective/corporal. If a detective were to be assigned to this position, he/she can start the tasks immediately, whereas we would need to train a deputy in investigative duties, which is really not aligned with his position of rank. This position provides a substantial amount of intelligence information to both unincorporated and Spokane Valley that is essential to our policing operations. So this position is definitely more suited for an investigator and needs to be filled as soon as possible so that we are not missing out on appropriate intelligence information for the safety of our community. In order to provide a detective to this position, there would be an increase of annual costs of$9,000, of which would be split$4500 for SV and $4500 for SO. It is the Sheriffs Office desire to make this change very soon. Keep in mind, this position is necessary to provide intelligence information for the safety and policing operations of our community. This is our intelligence-led-policing position that provides the analytical ability for our Property Crimes Unit as well as the rest of our Patrol Division to focus on emerging criminal trends to successfully work numerous cases and apprehend suspects, which has been extremely successful in the City of Spokane Valley. This position is also the Regional Intelligence Coordinator of our area and a direct link to the State Fusion Center. Original Commissioned Officer Worksheet Sheriff's Office-2010 Commissioned Officer Worksheet Total Commissioned FTE: 236.00 Total included in Commissioned Officer Charge: 217.67 Excludes those allocated along with administrative costs and those that are County responsibility. Category 1 Dedicated FTEs Note:"Unincorporated"here includes small cities. Admin Chief/Inspector Sergeant Lieutenant Patrol Captain Lieutenant Sergeant Detective/Corp. Deputies Traffic/CVEO Sergeant Detective/Corp. Deputies Property Crimes Sergeant Detective/Corp. Community Services Deputy Domestic Violence Detective/Corp. Deputy SRO Deputies Total Dedicated FTEs Unincorp Valley Medical Lake Deer Park Total 1 1 1 1 4 13 10 103 1 3 12 1 9 2 1 1 8 1 I 1 0.25 0.75 1 1 2 2 2 7 6 4 6 52 44 5 - 1 2 1 7 5 I - I 1I 3 6 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 83.25 80.75 5 3 172 Dedicated FTEs excluding S 80.25 76.75 5 2 164 Category 2 Investigative/ Community Services/K-9 Major Crimes Captain Lieutenant Sergeant Detectives Sex Crimes Sergeant Detectives Property Crimes TF Sergeant Detectives Deputies 5 1 5.84 1 4 3 ISU/CIU/DEC/JTTF/Meth%/DTF Lieutenant 1.00 Sergeant 1.00 Detectives 6.83 Deputies 2.25 Gang Enforcement Sergeant 1.00 Detective/Corp 2.00 Deputies 1.00 Total Investigative 37.92 Intelligence Led Policing Deputies 1 Marine/Search Rescue Deputies 1.75 K-9 Deputies 5 Total Investigative 45.67 Category 3 Allocated with Administrative Costs Command Staff Undersheriffs PIO Sergeant Training/OPS Lieutenant Sergeant Deputies 2 1 2 1 2 Total Administrative 8 Category 4 County Responsibility/ Other Cost Recovery Method Civil Lieutenant Deputies Marine Patrol Deputy 3 0.25 IDEA Detective/Corp 1 DTF Detective/Corp Deputies 1.50 0.75 Sex Off.Res.Verif. Detective/Corp 0.16 WA Meth Grant Detective/Corp 0.67 Sex Off Res.Verif.SA03 Detective/Corp. 1.00 Child Sex Pred Grant Deputy 1 Admin Sheriff 1 Total County/Other 10.33 Current Commisioned Officer Totals Sheriffs Office-2011 Commissioned Officer Worksheet Total Commissioned FTE: 223.00 Total included in Commissioned Officer Charge: 205.92 Excludes those allocated along with administrative costs and those that are County responsibility. Category 2 Shared Services Investigative! Community Services!K-9 Major Crimes Captain Lieutenant Sergeant Detectives Sex Crimes Sergeant Detectives Deputies Investigative Task Force Lieutenant Sergeant Detectives CIU/DEC/JTTF/Meth%/DTF Lieutenant Sergeant Detectives Deputies Gang Enforcement Sergeant Detective/Corp Deputies Total Investigative 1 1 4.84 1.00 0.25 1 3.83 0.25 1.00 2.00 30.17 Intellelligence Led Policing Deputies 1 Marine/Search Rescue Deputies 1.75 K-9 Deputies 5 Total Investigative/Support Sery 37.92 Changes to Commissioned Officer Worksheet Comm Officer Worksheet Current Category 3 Allocated with Administrative Costs Command Staff Undersheriffs PIO Sergeant Training/OPS Lieutenant Sergeant Detectives Deputies Total Administrative 2 2 1 2 Category 4 County Responsibility! Other Cost Recovery Method Civil Lieutenant Deputies Marine Patrol Deputy DTF Detective/Corp Deputies 3 0.25 1.50 0.75 Sex Offender Registration Detective/Corp 0.16 Sex Off.Res.Verif.SA03 Detective/Corp I 1.00 ISU Federal Seizures Lieutenant Detective/Corp Admin Sheriff 0.75 0.67 Total County/Other 9.08 Category 1 Dedicated FTEs Note:"Unincorporated"here includes small cities. Unincorp Valley Medical Lk Deer Park Total Admin Chief/Inspector 1 1 Sergeant 1 1 Lieutenant - 1 1 Patrol Captain 1 1 Lieutenant 2 2 4 Sergeant 8 6 14 Detective/Corp. - 6 6 Deputies 55.5 44 4.5 2 106 Traffic/CVEO Sergeant - 1 1 Detective/Corp. 2 1 I 3 Deputies 4 5 9 Property Crimes Sergeant - 1 1 Detective/Corp. 3 6 9 Community Services Deputy 1 I 1 I I 2 Domestic Violence Detective/Corp. 1 1 Deputy 1 I 1 SRO Deputies 3 4T - 7 Total Dedicated FTEs 80.5 81 4.5 2 168 Dedicated FTEs excluding SROs 77.5 77 4.5 2 161 Category 2 Shared Services Investigative! Community Services!K-9 Major Crimes Captain Lieutenant Sergeant Detectives Sex Crimes Sergeant Detectives Deputies Investigative Task Force Lieutenant Sergeant Detectives CIU/DEC/JTTF/Meth%/DTF Lieutenant Sergeant Detectives Deputies Gang Enforcement Sergeant Detective/Corp Deputies Total Investigative 1 1 4.84 1.00 0.25 1 3.83 0.25 1.00 2.00 30.17 Intellelligence Led Policing Deputies 1 Marine/Search Rescue Deputies 1.75 K-9 Deputies 5 Total Investigative/Support Sery 37.92 Changes to Commissioned Officer Worksheet Comm Officer Worksheet Current Category 3 Allocated with Administrative Costs Command Staff Undersheriffs PIO Sergeant Training/OPS Lieutenant Sergeant Detectives Deputies Total Administrative 2 2 1 2 Category 4 County Responsibility! Other Cost Recovery Method Civil Lieutenant Deputies Marine Patrol Deputy DTF Detective/Corp Deputies 3 0.25 1.50 0.75 Sex Offender Registration Detective/Corp 0.16 Sex Off.Res.Verif.SA03 Detective/Corp I 1.00 ISU Federal Seizures Lieutenant Detective/Corp Admin Sheriff 0.75 0.67 Total County/Other 9.08 Proposed Commissioned Officer Totals Sheriffs Office-2011 Commissioned Officer Worksheet Total Commissioned FTE: 223.00 Total included in Commissioned Officer Charge: 205.92 Excludes those allocated along with administrative costs and those that are County responsibility. Category 1 Dedicated FTEs Note:"Unincorporated"here includes small cities. Unincorp Valley Medical Lk Deer Park Total Admin Chief/Inspector 1 1 Sergeant 1 1 Lieutenant - 1 1 Patrol Captain 1 1 Lieutenant 2 2 4 Sergeant 8 6 14 Detective/Corp. - 6 6 Deputies 55.5 44 4.5 2 106 Traffic/CVEO Sergeant - 1 1 Detective/Corp. 2 1 3 Deputies 4 5 9 Property Crimes Sergeant - 1 1 Detective/Corp. 3 6 9 Community Services Deputy 1 I 1 I I 2 Domestic Violence Detective/Corp. 1 1 Deputy 1 1 SRO Deputies 3 4T - 7 Total Dedicated FTEs 80.5 81 4.5 2 168 Dedicated FTEs excluding SROs 77.5 77 4.5 2 161 Category 2 Shared Services Investigative! Community Services!K-9 Major Crimes Captain Lieutenant Sergeant Detectives Sex Crimes Sergeant Detectives Deputies Investigative Task Force Lieutenant Sergeant Detectives CIU/DEC/JTTF/Meth%/DTF Lieutenant Sergeant Detectives Deputies Gang Enforcement Sergeant Detective/Corp Deputies Total Investigative Intellelligence Led Policing Deputies 6 1 4.84 1.00 0.25 1 6 3.83 0.25 1.00 2.00 30.17 1 Marine/Search Rescue Deputies 1.75 K-9 Deputies 5 Total Investigative/Support Sery 37.92 Changes to Commissioned Officer Worksheet Proposed Comm Officer Worksheet Category 3 Allocated with Administrative Costs Command Staff Undersheriffs PIO Sergeant Training/OPS Lieutenant Sergeant Detectives Deputies Total Administrative 2 2 1 2 Category 4 County Responsibility! Other Cost Recovery Method Civil Lieutenant Deputies Marine Patrol Deputy DTF Detective/Corp Deputies 3 0.25 1.50 0.75 Sex Offender Registration Detective/Corp 0.16 Sex Off.Res.Verif.SA03 Detective/Corp I 1.00 ISU Federal Seizures Lieutenant Detective/Corp Admin Sheriff 0.75 0.67 Total County/Other 9.08 Exhibit 1 Services The COUNTY will provide law enforcement services Law Enforcement Services Allocated by Various consisting of the following: Bases • SCOPE/SIRT Category 1—Dedicated FTE's • Radio Dispatch • Valley Police Administration • Helicopter • Patrol • Forensics • Traffic Investigation • Crime Check • Property Crimes • Records Management • Community Services • Property Room • Domestic Violence Unit • Explosive Disposal • School Resource Officer • Communications Category 2—Shared Services Law Enforcement Services Included in the Per Investigative/Community Services/K-9 Commissioned Officer Rate • Major Crimes • LEIS • Sex Crimes • Crime Analysis Unit • Property Crimes Task Force • Garage • Investigative Support Unit • Firing Range • Investigative Task Force • Fleet • Criminal intelligence Unit • SWAT/Hostage Negotiation • Drug Endangered Children Detective • Extra Duty Employment • Joint Terrorism Task Force • Reservist and Explorer Units • Meth Detective • Countywide Indirect Costs—OMB A-87 • Drug Task Force • Annual Changes in Accrued Leave • Gang Enforcement • Intelligence LED Policing • Marine/Search and Rescue • K-9 Category 3—Allocated with Administrative Costs • Administration—Undersheriff and Staff • Public Information Officer • Office of Professional Standards and Training Category 4—County Responsibility and Other Cost Recovery Method • Civil Process • Marine Patrol Grant • DEA Grant • Drug Task Force Grant • Sex Offender Registration • Sex Offender Residency Verification Grant • WA Meth Grant • Child Sex Predator Grant • ISU Federal Seizures • Sheriff CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 6, 2011 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin.report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Spokane Valley Police Department Accreditation GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Informational BACKGROUND: Provide background on the WASPC Accreditation of the SVPD. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Chief Rick Van Leuven ATTACHMENTS Powerpoint slides (8) Spokane Valley Police - Accreditation 2011 SPOKANE VALLEY POLICE SPOKANE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT 12710 Background on Accreditation • The purpose of law enforcement agency accreditation is to professionalize the law enforcement industry by providing a review process for agencies to be certified as operating under industry best practices and standards. • In 1976 the Association was directed by the Washington State Legislature to develop standards and goals for Washington State Law Enforcement. The Association has maintained an operational accreditation program since that time. • The current accreditation program was created in 2007 and is overseen by the Accreditation Committee, Accreditation Commission, and Board of Directors. — The Committee is responsible for maintaining accreditation standards. — The Commission is responsible for reviewing accreditation on-site reports and making recommendations to the Board of Directors. — The Board of Directors is responsible for conferring accreditation. Purpose of Accreditation: • To increase public confidence in the agency • To increase credibility • To provide a systemized agency self-assessment • To broaden perspectives • To intensify administrative and operational effectiveness • To ensure recruitment, selection, and promotion processes are fair and equitable • To strengthen understanding of agency policies and procedures by agency personnel • To improve agency morale and pride • To decrease susceptibility to litigation and costly civil court settlements • To potentially reduce liability insurance costs • To provide state and local recognition of professional competence Accreditation assesses the agency's ability to meet the 140 standards, addressing 20 major law enforcement areas as established by the Association's Accreditation Committee. — Goals and Objectives — Role and Authority — Use of Force — Management, Staffing, Organization — Records Management — Information Technology — Unusual Occurrences — Health and Safety — Fiscal Management — Recruitment and Selection — Training — Performance Evaluation — Code of Conduct — Internal Affairs — Patrol Function — Traffic Function — Investigative Function — Evidence and Property Control Function and Utilization of Personnel — Prisoner Security — Agency Facilities • A lot of time and effort went into the preparation for the accreditation , well over a year, to provide proof for the WASPC standards, which are best practices for continuous improvement. • During the Accreditation On-Site, the Accreditation Team had only one recommendation for a standard that SVPD needed to improve upon , which was done that same afternoon . • Only 54 agencies out of 274 in the State of Washington are accredited. • Of the 39 Sheriff's Offices in the State of Washington, only 8 are accredited, with SCSO being 1 of those 8. • SVPD joins SCSO and Cheney PD in being the only accredited law enforcement agencies in Spokane County. • SVPD is the first and largest contract-law enforcement agency in the state to become accredited through WASPC standards. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY ACCREDITATION AWARD IN RECOGNITION OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY POLICE-DEPARTMENT For successfully meeting the professionst standards as outlined in the Washington Association of Sheriffs 6 Police Chiefs LEWEnforcement Accreditation Program November 16.2011 Benefits to the Community • Credible framework for evaluation of policy and procedures; • Highlights agency capability and competency; • Improved management procedures; • Increased employee morale; • Enhanced planning and innovation ; • Reduces agency risk and exposure; • Improves agency and community relations; and , • Solid foundation for agency to build upon . Questions ?? DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only as of November 30,2011; 2:00 p.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council& Staff From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings December 13,2011,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Dec 5] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-020 Electric Lightwave Franchise—Cary Driskell (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 11-022 Max.Criminal Penalty,Gross Misdemeanor—C.Driskell(5 min) 4. Proposed Resolution Amending Speed Limits—Neil Kersten/Inga Note (20 minutes) 5.Motion Consideration: Bid Award, Sullivan Road W.Bridge Temporary Repairs—Steve Worley(10 minutes) 6.Motion Consideration: Law Enforcement Interlocal—Morgan Koudelka (10 minutes) 7.Mayoral Appointments of Councilmembers to various Committee and Boards—Mayor Towey (15 minutes) 8.Mayoral Appointments of Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Members—Mayor Towey (15 minutes) 9.Motion Consideration: Street Maintenance Contract Renewal—Neil Kersten (15 minutes) 10.Motion Consideration: Sweeping Contract Renewals—Neil Kersten (15 minutes) 11.Admin Report: Proposed Code Text Amendment,Boundary Line Adjustments—Marty Palaniuk (15 min) 12.Admin Report: Comp Plan Amendments—John Hohman (30 minutes) 13. Info Only: (a)Pedestrian Flagging Program(Inga Note)(b) Snow Plowing Policy [*estimated meeting: 160 minutes] Wednesday, Dec 14; 9 a.m. —1 p.m. —CONFIRMED Council Tour December 20, 2011,No meeting(Christmas Week) December 27, 2011,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Dec 19]] 1. Oath of Office Administered to Dean Grafos,Ben Wick,Arne Woodard —Carrie Koudelka (— 10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda: Claims,payroll,minutes (5 minutes) 3.First Reading Proposed Ordinance,Code Text Amendment,Boundary Line Adjustments—M.Palaniuk(10 min) 4.Mayoral Appointments of Planning Commissioners —Mayor Towey (10 minutes) 5.Admin Report: Snow Plowing Policy—Neil Kersten (30 minutes) 6. Info Only: (1) Street Preservation;(2) Dept Reports [*estimated meeting: 65 minutes] January 3,2012,NO MEETING January 6-7:Elected Officials Essentials: (A WC training)Spokane January 10,2012,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Tue,Jan 3]] 1.Mayor and Deputy Mayor Elections—Chris Bainbridge (15 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance,Code Text Amdmnt,Boundary Line Adjustments—M.Palaniuk(10 min) 4.Admin Report: Landscaping Code Amendments—Karen Kendall (30 minutes) 5.Admin Report: Governance Manual Discussion—Chris Bainbridge (20 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 80 minutes] Draft Advance Agenda 12/1/2011 2:58:16 PM Page 1 of 2 January 17,2012, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Jan 9] 1. Spokane Regional Sports Commission(Sports Marketing& Its Impact in the Valley) —Eric Sawyer (20 mins) 2. International Fire Code—Mary Kate McGee/Kevin Miller (15 minutes) 3.ADA Discussion—Mary Kate McGee (15 minutes) 4. Street Preservation—Neil Kersten (20 minutes) 5.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 75 minutes] January 24, 2012,Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Tues Jan 17] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Info Only: Dept Reports [*estimated meeting: minutes] January 25-26: CLAC(City Legislative Action Conference) - Olympia January 31,2012, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Jan 23] 1. Computer/Laptop Agenda Training—Greg Bingaman (30 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda February 7,2012, Tentative Retreat,8:30 a.m.—4:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Jan 30] Possible topics:Economic Development; February 7,2012, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Jan 30] 1. Advance Agenda February 14, 2012,Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Feb 6] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Admin Report: Lodging Tax—Round Two—Mark Calhoun (20 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] February 21,2012, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Feb 13] 1.Advance Agenda February 28, 2012,Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Feb 20] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Bidding Contracts(SVMC 3.—bidding exceptions) Quiet Zones Centennial Trail Agreement Revenue Policy,Cost Recovery Contracts,Annual Renewals,histories,etc. Senior Housing Ending Fund Balance Shoreline Draft Goals and Policies Fire Department Interlocal Agreement Sidewalks Governor's Budget Reduction Alts,Review of Special Events Permits/Charitable Solicitations Great Northern Railroad Right-of-way Speed Limits,(overall system) Investment Accounts Sprague Appleway Corridor Environ.Assessment Manufactured Homes Traffic School Interlocal Mission Ave Design(Mission&Long ped. crossing) Pavement Management Program Update *time for public or council comments not included Prosecution Services Public Input Process for Capital Projects Draft Advance Agenda 12/1/2011 2:58:16 PM Page 2 of 2