Loading...
Minutes - 03/26/2009 Spokane Valley Planning Commission Approved Minutes Council Chambers — City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. March 26, 2009 I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Robertson called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance III. ROLL CALL Commissioners Robertson, Mann, Towey, Sharpe, Carroll and Sands were present. Commissioner Eggleston was absent. Staff attending the meeting: Kathy McClung, Director; Greg McCormick, Planning Manager; John Hohman, Development Services Senior Engineer; Mike Basinger, Associate Planner; Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner; Martin Palaniuk, Planning Technician; Henry Allen, Development Engineer; Gloria Mantz, Development Engineer; Alysa Wiyrick, Assistant Engineer; Ryan Brodwater, Assistant Engineer, Rod Pegram, Construction Inspector; Deanna Griffith, Administrative Assistant. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was moved by Commissioner Sharpe, seconded and unanimously agreed to accept the March 26, 2009 agenda as presented. V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Sharpe made a motion which was seconded to approve the January 8 and the February 26 minutes as written. It was approved VI. PUBLIC COMMENT There was no public comment. VII. COMMISSION REPORTS Commissioner Carroll stated he had been approached by citizen, Mary Pollard to talk about her petition; there were no other Commission reports VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS No Administrative Reports IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS A. Old Business — Continued Public Hearing, 2009 Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Senior Planner Mike Basinger reviewed where the Commission had progressed from the last meeting and the amendments that needed to be covered. CPA-01-09 Assistant Planner Karen Kendall discussed the amendment CPA-01- 09. This amendment is located on 4 Ave, east of Sullivan Rd., the applicant is requesting a change for all eight parcels be changed from Low Density Residential (LDR) to High Density Residential (HDR). Ms. Kendall presented, as requested, the alternatives that could be considered for this Comprehensive Plan amendment. The alternatives are: approve as requested with all eight parcels as HDR, make the 03/26/2009 Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 3 seven westerly parcels HDR and the easterly parcel to LDR, make the seven westerly parcels HDR and the easterly parcel MDR. Staff did explain the differences in the density options and the height restrictions in the different designation/zoning distinctions. Commissioner Sands made a motion to recommend to City Council that CPA-01-09 be approved as the seven westerly parcels as high density residential and the easterly parcel as medium density residential, second by Commissioner Robertson. Commissioners discuss the traffic issues, the neighborhood concerns, whether the compromise is a win for both sides. Vote on the motion is five to one, with Commissioner Mann being the dissenting vote. CPA-05-09, Senior Planner Basinger explained that while the Public/Quasi-Public changes, two items were noticed that should be changed. ECS-3 all these parcels are surrounded by R-2 and so moving all parcels to ECS-1 and making them R-2. In the East North section, EN-6 was designated to be Heavy Industrial should be L- I. Commissioner Sands made a motion to recommend approval to the City Council of CPA-05-09, Commissioner Sharpe second the motion, motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Sands made a motion to adopt the Planning Commission Findings for the 2009 Comprehensive Plan amendments, CPA-02-08 through CPA-04-09 and CPA-06-09 through CPA-08-09. Second by Commissioner Towey, motion passed unanimously. Break at 6:30, resume at 6:36 p.m. B.Study Session — Draft Street Standards, Development Services Senior Engineer, John Hohman introduced his team and they began the review of the Draft Street Standards. Mr. Hohman explained that the purpose of the Street Standards, that there would be Uniform Development Code amendments to support the Street Standards and that all of this would support was to bring all new development and capital projects into common standards and practices. The Draft Street Standards also supports the Comprehensive Plan goals and Policies that are related to transportation. Staff shared a comparison of existing and proposed standards. Mr. Hohman and his staff of engineers discussed with the Commission members the proposed Street Standards, changes for improvements, the considerable research with other jurisdictions, private vs. public streets, pavement width, they covered each chapter and answered questions from Commissioners when they came up. Staff also discussed the public involvement to-date, improvements made after the public review draft had been out and public comment had been received, contentious issues that had been raised, the fact that all information had been moved to one document. Director McClung stated that the Development Services department had made several presentations to groups to get as much input as possible regarding the Public Hearing Draft of the Street Standards. Commissioners thanked the Staff members for a clear, concise presentation. 03/26/2009 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 3 X. GOOD OF THE ORDER There was nothing for the good of the order. XI. AD70URNMENT The being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 7:54 pm SUBMITTED: APPROVED: Deanna Griffith, Administrative Assistant Ian Robertson, Chairperson 03/26/2009 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 3