2012, 01-10 Regular Meeting AGENDA
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
FORMAL FORMAT MEETING
Tuesday,January 10,2012 6:00 p.m.
Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers
ll707 E Sprague Avenue
Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting
CALL TO ORDER:
INVOCATION: Pastor Matthew Larson, Advent Lutheran Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
ROLL CALL:
1. ELECTION OF COUNCIL OFFICERS: Chris Bainbridge
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS:
COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS:
MAYOR'S REPORT:
PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those
on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW
BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.)
When you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to
three minutes.
2. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any
member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered
separately.
a. Approval of the following claim vouchers:
VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS: TOTAL AMOUNT
12/23/2011 24709-24776 $298,007.73
12/30/2011 24777-24791; 1222110145 $ 19,09628
12/30/2011 24792-24805 $ 20,482.12
O1/03/2012 5388-5391 $ 682.00
O1/04/2012 3795-3809; 24806-24811 $250,478.52
GRAND TOTAL $588,746.65
b. Approval of Payroll for period ending December 30, 2011: $312,427.77
NEW BUSINESS:
3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 12-001, Code Text Amendment, Boundary Line Adjustments—
Marty Palaniuk [public comment]
4. Motion Consideration: Pines Road Proj ect#0061 Transpo Consultant Agreement —Steve Worley
[public comment]
5. Motion Consideration: Street Maintenance Contract Renewal—Neil Kersten [public comment]
Council Agenda 01-10-12 Formal Format Meeting Page 1 of 2
6. Motion Consideration: Street Sweeping Contract Renewal—Neil Kersten [public comment]
7. Motion Consideration: Traffic School Interlocal Agreement—Morgan Koudelka [public comment]
PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on
this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW
BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When
you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three
minutes.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
8. Spokane Co. Library Facilities Master Plan—Chair Tim Hattenburg
9. Senske Contract Renewal—Mike Stone
10. Advance Agenda—Mayor Towey
INFORMATION ONLY(will not be discussed or reported):
11. City Hall at the Mall
12. Spokane Valley Municipal Code Housekeeping Items
ADJOURNMENT
General MeetinQ Schedule(meeting schedule is always subject to change)
Regular Council meetings are generally held every Tuesday beginning at 6:00 p.m.
The Formal meeting formats are generally held the 2°d and 4`h Tuesda,� Formal meeting have time allocated for
general public comments as well as comments after each action item.
The Study Session formats(the less formal meeting) are generally held the ls` 3ra and 5`h Tuesda,�
Study Session formats DO NOT have time allocated for general public comments; but if action items are included,
comments are permitted after those specific action items.
NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical,
hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921-1000 as soon as possible so that
arrangements may be made.
Council Agenda 01-10-12 Formal Format Meeting Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: January 10, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑public hearing
❑information ❑ admin.report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Council Officer Selections
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: City of Spokane Valley Resolution 10-020, Governance Manual
Article I, Section 1.02—Council Meetings: Election of Officers
Article I, of the Governance Manual describes the procedures for electing officers: Biennially, at the
first meeting of the new Council, the members thereof shall choose a presiding officer from their number
who shall have the title of Mayor. Following the election of the Mayor, there shall be an election for a
Deputy Mayor. The term of the Deputy Mayor shall run concurrently with that of the Mayor. (RCW
35A.13.030).
• The election for Mayor shall be conducted by the City Clerk.
• The City Clerk calls for nominations.
• Each member of the City Council shall be permitted to nominate not more than one (1)person; no
member of the City Council is obligated to nominate a candidate.
• Nominations do not require a second.
• A nominee who wishes to decline the nomination shall so state at that time.
• Nominations are then closed.
• Except when there is only one nominee, election is by written ballot.
• Each ballot shall contain the name of the Councilmember who cast it.
• Election is determined by majority vote.
• The City Clerk publicly announces the results of the election.
• Ties shall be resolved in a contest by chance (the City Clerk will flip a coin)
• Thereafter, the City Clerk records the individual votes by councilmembers in the meeting
minutes.
The election for Deputy Mayor shall be conducted by the Mayor-elect, and nominations shall be made in
the manner previously described for the election of the Mayor.
If Council is unable to agree on a Mayor by maj ority vote of inembers present, the Office of Mayor shall
be temporarily filled by an Acting Mayor. The office of Acting Mayor shall be filled by the
Councilmember who just previously served as Deputy Mayor, or if such person is not a member of the
Council, the Councilmember with the next highest seniority. The Acting Mayor and Acting Deputy
Mayor shall continue in office and exercise such authority as is described in RCW 35A.13 until the
members of the Council agree on a Mayor, at which time the role of Acting Mayor and Acting Deputy
Mayor shall cease and terminate.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Conduct election of Mayor and Deputy Mayor
STAFF CONTACT: Chris Bainbridge
ATTACHMENTS
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: January 10, 2012 Department Director Approval: �
Check all that apply: � consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers:
VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS: TOTAL AMOUNT
12/23/2011 24709-24776 $298,007.73
12/30/2011 24777-24791; 1222110145 $ 19,09628
12/30/2011 24792-24805 $ 20,482.12
O1/03/2012 5388-5391 $ 682.00
O1/04/2012 3795-3809; 24806-24811 $250,478.52
GRAND TOTAL $588,746.65
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers as listed above.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS Voucher Lists
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
12/23/2011 9:13:04AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
24709 12/23/2011 002931 ALL WESTERN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 92415 101.000.000 SUPPLIES: PW 328.31
Total : 328.31
24710 12/23/2011 001012 ASSOC BUSINESS SYSTEMS 150016 001.013.015 COPIER COSTS: LEGAL 414.02
Total : 414.02
24711 12/23/2011 002655 AZTECH ELECTRIC INC PayApp 1 101.042.133 11-008 CONSTRUCTION CONTRAC' 88,283.19
Total : 88,283.19
24712 12/23/2011 002603 B&H PHOTO VIDEO 55571344 001.090.000 COMPRESSOR/LIMITERAND WIDE 429.95
Total : 429.95
24713 12/23/2011 001816 BENTHIN&ASSOCIATES 1830 402.402.000 SPVW CONTRACT#10-027 J 859.00
Total : 859.00
24714 12/23/2011 000173 BINGAMAN,GREG CELLALLOWANCE 001.018.014 4TH QUARTER CELLALLOWANCE:; 135.00
Total : 135.00
24715 12/23/2011 000168 BLACK BOX NETWORK SVC SPO-022654 001.090.000 UPGRADE SERVER INSTALLATION 1,777.25
Total : 1,777.25
24716 12/23/2011 000904 BRANCH, CAROLBELLE CELLALLOWANCE 001.018.013 4TH QUARTER CELLALLOWANCE:; 135.00
Total : 135.00
24717 12/23/2011 000796 BUDINGER&ASSOC INC H11392-1 402.402.150 SWALE TESTING SERVICES 3,151.09
Total : 3,151.09
24718 12/23/2011 001103 CAREER TRACK 13160957 001.143.70. SEMINAR REGISTRATION 49.00
Total : 49.00
24719 12/23/2011 002562 CD'A METALS 399804 101.000.000 SUPPLIES: PW 2,478.88
400108
400700
400708
403663
_. __ . __
101.000.000 SUPPLIES: PW
101.000.000 SUPPLIES: PW
101.000.000 SUPPLIES: PW
101.000.000 SUPPLIES: PW
7,194.16
25.11
150.01
111.20
Total : 9,959.36
Page: 1
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
12/23/2011 9:13:04AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
24720 12/23/2011 000101 CDW-G C184511 001.090.000 IPAD DCOK 33.14
Total : 33.14
24721 12/23/2011 002226 CENTRAL PREMIX 13-1649736 101.000.000 ROUND GRAVEL 136.19
Total : 136.19
24722 12/23/2011 000863 CENTURY WEST ENG CORP 232800 101.042.000 2011 TIP SERVICES 6,111.94
24723 12/23/2011 000322 CENTURYLINK
24724 12/23/2011 002928 CONVOY SUPPY
24725
24726
24727
24728
24729
24730
24731
12/23/2011 000683 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES
12/23/2011 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
12/23/2011 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST
12/23/2011 002930 EQUIPMENT WATCH
12/23/2011 001232 FASTENAL CO
12/23/2011 001003 GEOENGINEERS INC
12/23/2011 001009 GOTHMANN,WILLIAM
. .
232802
DECEMBER 2011
CRYWOLF:6608
311650
312704
RE 46 JG6362 L009
RE313-ATB11213146
DECEMBER 2011
41248424
IDLEW79296
0115941
CELL ALLOWANCE
EXPENSES
303.303.063 10-011 DESIGN ROW CIP 0063
Total :
001.076.302 DECEMBER 2011: PHONE SERVICE
Total :
001.000.000 CRYWOLF REFUND: PERMIT#V35
Total :
303.303.148 GREENACRES TRAIL DESING
001.058.055 SPOKANE VALLEY PLAT REVIEW
Total :
303.303.113 TEMPORARY SIGNAL:SULLIVAN&I
101.042.000 BRIDGE INSPECTION
Total :
001.076.304 ADVERTISING:SENIOR CENTER
Total :
001.032.000 ONLINE ACCESS TO DATA FOR FOI
Total :
101.000.000 SUPPLIES:PW
Total :
303.303.141 0141 SULLIVAN&EUCLID PCC GEC
Total :
001.011.000 4TH QUARTER CELLALLOWANCE::
001.011.000 MILEAGE
267.19
6,379.13
489.77
489.77
165.00
165.00
8,577.19
1,452.50
10,029.69
779.54
3,351.45
4,130.99
39.55
39.55
2,826.20
2,826.20
1.87
1.87
5,572.79
5,572.79
135.00
334.11
Page: 2
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
12/23/2011 9:13:04AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
24731 12/23/2011 001009 001009 GOTHMANN,WILLIAM (Continued) Total : 469.11
24732 12/23/2011 002235 GRAFOS, DEAN CELLALLOWANCE 001.011.000 4TH QUARTER CELLALLOWANCE:; 135.00
Total : 135.00
24733 12/23/2011 000007 GRAINGER 9700534853 101.000.000 SUPPLIES: PW 150.00
24734 12/23/2011 002271 GRASSEL, BRENDA
24735 12/23/2011 000002 H&H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC.
24736 12/23/2011 002682 HAFNER,CHARLES
24737 12/23/2011 000009 HEWLETf PACKARD CO
24738 12/23/2011 002538 HYDRAULICS PLUS, INC
24739 12/23/2011 000265 JACKSON, MIKE
9700808885
9703184433
CELL ALLOWANCE
2011
CELL ALLOWANCE
31033897-004
50536404
14441
CELL ALLOWANCE
EXPENSES
24740 12/23/2011 000275 KERSTEN, NEIL CELLALLOWANCE
24741 12/23/2011 000910 MANTZ, GLORIA EXPENSES
24742 12/23/2011 002926 MP CONSULTING&CONSTRUCTION 34
101.000.000
101.000.000
001.011.000
�� �iYZ:�iId�]
001.011.000
001.090.000
001.090.000
101.000.000
001.013.000
001.013.000
001.032.000
001.058.055
001.016.000
SUPPLIES: PW
SUPPLIES: PW
Total :
4TH QUARTER CELLALLOWANCE:;
Total :
NOVEMBER COPIER COST
Total :
4TH QUARTER CELLALLOWANCE:;
Total :
SERVER FOR MITEL UPGRADE TO
SERVER FOR MITEL UPGRADE TO
Total :
SUPPLIES: PW
Total :
4TH QUARTER CELLALLOWANCE:;
TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT
Total :
4TH QUARTER CELLALLOWANCE:;
Total :
TRAVEL REIMB:ARCGIS DESKTOP
Total :
PAINTING PROJECT: PRECINT
Page:
276.62
14.89
441.51
135.00
135.00
1,871.24
1,871.24
135.00
135.00
284.87
499.12
783.99
624.82
624.82
135.00
220.09
355.09
135.00
135.00
123.93
123.93
700.24
�3
vchlist Voucher List Page: 4
12/23/2011 9:13:04AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
24742 12/23/2011 002926 002926 MP CONSULTING&CONSTRUCTIOt (Continued) Total : 700.24
24743 12/23/2011 000662 NAT'L BARRICADE&SIGN CO 75077 101.000.000 SUPPLIES: PW 173.92
Total : 173.92
24744 12/23/2011 000008 NORLIFT 20051564 101.000.000 SUPPLIES: PW 855.47
24745
24746
24747
24748
24749
24750
20051662
12/23/2011 000239 NORTHWEST BUSINESS STAMP INC. 85727
12/23/2011 001233 NORTHWEST FENCE COMPANY 0018367-IN
12/23/2011 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 1420102289
587987110001
588968875001
12/23/2011 000027 OFFICE OF THE CODE REVISER DECEMBER 2011
12/23/2011 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER NOVEMBER 2011
12/23/2011 000881 OXARC
24751 12/23/2011 002424 PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL
24752 12/23/2011 001860 PLATT
24753 12/23/2011 000041 PROTHMAN COMPANY
SSR9111
SSR9303
1428301-CD11
0777308
2011-3206
101.000.000 SUPPLIES: PW
Total :
001.018.016 PICTURE ID BADGES
Total :
101.042.000 CHAINLINK GATE INSTALLATION: P
Total :
001.090.000 SUPPLIES:ADMIN
001.076.000 SUPPLIES: CP
001.032.000 SUPPLIES: PW
Total :
001.143.70. 2012 ANNUAL WAC
Total :
001.016.000 STATE REMITTANCE
Total :
101.000.000 SUPPLIES: PW
101.000.000 SUPPLIES: PW
Total :
001.090.000 DECEMBER 2011: POSTAGE METEf
Total :
001.076.305 SUPPLIES: PW
Total :
001.018.013 INTERIM DEPUTY CITY MGR SERVI
130.44
985.91
16.85
16.85
1,873.16
1,873.16
2.37
217.39
32.60
252.36
576.11
576.11
44,619.67
44,619.67
579.91
195.15
775.06
275.00
275.00
127.44
127.44
5,603.20
Page: 4
vchlist Voucher List Page: 5
12/23/2011 9:13:04AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
24753 12/23/2011 000041 000041 PROTHMAN COMPANY (Continued) Total : 5,603.20
24754 12/23/2011 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, INC. 28583 001.016.000 VEHICLE GRAPHICS: POLICE CRUI 911.99
Total : 911.99
24755 12/23/2011 002616 ROADWISE, INC 1003918 101.000.000 FREEZGARD ZERO: PW 13,390.04
Total : 13,390.04
24756 12/23/2011 002288 SARGENT ENGINEERS INC. 27539 303.303.157 SULLIVAN BRIDGE TEMP REPAIRS 495.66
Total : 495.66
24757 12/23/2011 000064 SCHIMMELS, GARY CELLALLOWANCE 001.011.000 4TH QUARTER CELLALLOWANCE:; 135.00
24758 12/23/2011 002929 SILHOUETTE LIGHTS&STAGING
24759 12/23/2011 002531 SIX ROBBLEES INC
24760 12/23/2011 002285 SKINFILL, LINDSEY
24761 12/23/2011 000710 SPOKANE CO BAR ASSOC
24762 12/23/2011 000710 SPOKANE CO BAR ASSOC
EXPENSES
26124
5-621093
5-622218
EXPENSES
WSBA#24087
WSBA#33544
24763 12/23/2011 000172 SPOKANE CO ENGINEER VLY1111
24764 12/23/2011 000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECUTING ATTY NOVEMBER 2011
24765 12/23/2011 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 11002404
001.011.000 REIMBURSEMENT
Total :
001.076.305 GREAT ROOM REPAIR:CP
Total :
101.000.000 SUPPLES:PW
101.000.000 SUPPLES:PW
Total :
001.018.016 WELLNESS REIMBURSEMENT
Total :
001.013.015 CLE TRAINING:C. DRISKELL
Total :
001.013.015 CLE TRAINING: K. KONKRIGHT
Total :
101.042.000 COUNTY SERVICES
Total :
001.016.000 CRIME VICTIMS COMP FUND
Total :
101.042.000 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION:SPF
130.78
265.78
694.71
694.71
33.61
46.07
79.68
41.35
41.35
15.95
15.95
15.95
15.95
45,528.61
45,528.61
617.87
617.87
283.95
Page: 5
vchlist Voucher List Page: 6
12/23/2011 9:13:04AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
24765 12/23/2011 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER (Continued)
51500968
24766 12/23/2011 000093 SPOKESMAN-REVIEW 23152
24767 12/23/2011 002135 SPRAY CENTER ELECTRONICS, INC 211352
211353
24768 12/23/2011 001875 STRATA S110387-IN
24769 12/23/2011 001895 TAYLOR ENGINEERING INC #1
24770 12/23/2011 002306 TERRELL, LANDSCAPEARCHITECT, MIC 702
708
24771 12/23/2011 001911 THE GLOVER MANSION CP401
24772 12/23/2011 002254 TOWEY,TOM CELLALLOWANCE
EXPENSES
24773 12/23/2011 001464 TW TELECOM 04578111
24774 12/23/2011 002909 WA DEPT OF ENTERPRISE SERVICES 2011110058
24775 12/23/2011 002651 WOODARD,ARNE CELLALLOWANCE
24776 12/23/2011 000089 XO COMMUNICATIONS 0247450104
__ __ - _
101.042.000 NOVEMBER 2011:WORK CREW
Total :
001.011.000 YEARLY SUBSCRIPTION:COUNCIL
Total :
101.000.000 SUPPLIES: PW
101.000.000 SUPPLIES: PW
Total :
303.303.142 GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AN
303.303.115
309.309.079
309.309.079
001.090.000
001.011.000
001.011.000
001.076.305
001.032.000
001.011.000
001.090.000
Total :
PROF SURVEY SVCS FOR 0115
Total :
GREENACRES PARK PHASE I DESI
GREENACRES PARK PHASE I DESI
Total :
EMPLOYEEAPPRICIATION DINNEF
Total :
4TH QUARTER CELLALLOWANCE:;
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
Total :
INTERNET/DATA LINES/PHONE LINI
Total :
AUTOCAD CIVIL 3D 2012 SUB AND
Total :
4TH QUARTER CELLALLOWANCE::
Total :
INTERNET/DATA LINES
5,985.17
6,269.12
192.00
192.00
91.38
19.78
111.16
1,757.64
1,757.64
9,675.99
9,675.99
8,147.47
4,722.25
12,869.72
989.39
989.39
135.00
39.96
174.96
1,290.62
1,290.62
5,686.83
5,686.83
135.00
135.00
283.61
Page: 6
vchlist Voucher List Page: 7
12/23/2011 9:13:04AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
24776 12/23/2011 000089 000089 XO COMMUNICATIONS (Continued) Total : 283.61
68 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 298,007.73
68 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 298,007.73
I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished,the services
rendered,or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
Page: 7
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
12/30/2011 11:09:30AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
24777 12/30/2011 001081 ALSCO LSP01069924 001.058.057 FLOOR MATS: BUILDING 33.22
Total : 33.22
24778 12/30/2011 000694 AVISTA UTILITIES 32808 001.090.000 HOME ENERGYAUDITS 1,122.00
24779 12/30/2011 002206 BARLOW, LORI
24780 12/30/2011 001048 CITY PARCEL
24781 12/30/2011 000734 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
24782
24783
12/30/2011 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST
12/30/2011 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC
24784 12/30/2011 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC.
EXPENSES
CW1111267
RE-313-ATB11213055
RE-313-ATB11213060
RE-313-ATB 11213066
DECEMBER 2011
37293
37294
37295
37296
37297
37298
37316
37318
37319
37320
37321
590256359001
590256422001
590256423001
Total :
001.018.016 WELLNESS REIMBURSEMENT
Total :
001.058.057
101.042.000
101.042.000
101.042.000
001.076.305
001.013.000
001.013.000
001.013.000
001.013.000
001.013.000
001.058.056
001.013.000
001.058.056
001.058.056
001.058.056
001.058.056
001.0�2.000
001.032.000
001.032.000
COURIER SERVICE:CD
Total :
STATE ROUTE ROADWAY MAINT
SIGNAL&ILLUMINATION MAIN
INTELLIGENTTRAFFIC SYSTEMS�
Total :
ADVERTISING: CP
Total :
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
LEGAL PUBLICATION
SUPPLIES: PW
SUPPLIES: PW
SUPPLIES: PW
Total :
1,122.00
43.11
43.11
11.00
11.00
3,569.37
1,351.73
5,552.11
10,473.21
158.90
158.90
113.90
34.85
43.35
36.55
25.00
64.60
213.85
89.25
93.50
71.40
71.40
857.65
343.18
10.57
17.65
Page: 1
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
12/30/2011 71:09:30AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
24784 12/30/2011 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. (Continued)
24785 12/30/2011 002844 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC
24786 12/30/2011 000881 OXARC
24787 12/30/2011 000119 PLESE PRINTING
24788 12/30/2011 000335 TIRE-RAMA
590257679001
590257719001
590269062001
1111303
SSS0522
SSS0700 �
1330050141
1330050271
1330050275
8080014744
24789 12/30/2011 000337 UPS 19758993
24790 12/30/2011 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS 1040573743
1040574572
24791 12/30/2011 001792 WHITEHEAD,JOHN EXPENSES
1222110145 12/22/2011 002244 AOT PUBLIC SAFETY CORPORATION SPKVLY-24
16 Vouchers for bank code: apbank
16 Vouchers in this report
001.032.000 SUPPLIES: PW
001.032.000 SUPPLIES: PW
001.032.000 SUPPLIES: PW
Total :
001.058.050 LOCATOR TICKET MGMT SYSTEM
Total :
101.000.000 SUPPLIES: PW
101.000.000 SUPPLIES: PW
Total :
001.058.055 NAME&TITLE PLATES
001.011.000 BUSINESS CARDS
001.011.000 NAME PLATE
Total :
001.058.057 06769D: OIL CHANGE&DIAGNOST
Total :
101.000.000 SHIPPING CHARGES: PW
Total :
001.016.000 AIR CARD FOR SHERIFF
001.016.000 AIR CARDS FOR POLICE DEPARTN
Total :
001.018.016 TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT
Total :
001.016.000 CRY WOLF CHARGES:DECEMBER
Total :
Bank total :
Total vouchers :
36.95
7.96
7.96
424.27
50.00
50.00
51.83
80.66
132.49
28.81
86.93
16.88
132.62
221.73
221.73
93.00
93.00
43.01
860.36
903.37
280.90
280.90
4,158.81
4,158.81
19,096.28
19,096.28
Page: 2
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
12/30/2011 1:57:28PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
24792 12/30/2011 001606 BANNER BANK 0618 001.011.000 DEC 2011•0618 2 521 28
24793
24794
24795
24796
24797
24798
24799
24800
12/30/2011 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC
12/30/2011 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
12/30/2011 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION#19
12/30/2011 000007 GRAINGER
12/30/2011 001635 ISS FACILITY/EVENT SERVICES
12/30/2011 001944 LANCER LTD
0638
4064
4375
4458
4720
8861
9280416
9284374
9286377
S0022484
S0022509
S0022589
Dec 2011
December 2011
9698623064
155460
84181
0422674
12/30/2011 002902 LOW MCKINLEY BALERIA&SALENKO 6428
12/30/2011 000252 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT December 2011
001.011.000 DEC 2011:0638 45.00
001.058.055 DEC 2011:4064 1,726.92
001.011.000 DEC 2011:4375 2,569.75
001.011.000 DEC 2011:4458 422.32
001.013.000 D EC 2011:4720 1,145.87
001.076.301 DEC 2011:8861 1,462.93
Total : 9,894.07
001.076.305 LINEN SUPPLYAND SERVICEAT CI 29.93
001.076.305 LINEN SUPPLYAND SERVICEAT CI 29.93
001.076.305 LINEN SUPPLYAND SERVICEAT CI 389.32
001.076.305 LINEN SUPPLYAND SERVICE:CEN 11.25
001.076.305 LINEN SUPPLYAND SERVICEAT CI 112.50
001.076.305 LINEN SUPPLYAND SERVICEAT CI 48.50
Total : 621.43
001.058.056 PETTY CASH: 10020,21,26,28,29,30 89.14
Total : 89.14
001.076.300 UTILITIES: PARKS 65.66
Total : 65.66
001.076.305 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 978.46
Total : 978.46
001.076.305 EVENT SERVICES FOR NOVEMBEF 148.81
001.076.305 FLOOR WAXING IN GREAT RM:CP 644.21
Total : 793.02
001.076.305 SUPPLY FOR CENTERPLACE 686.17
Total : 686.17
001.013.015 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 267.50
Total : 267.50
001.016.000 OPERATING SUPPLIES:CP 798.95
Page: 1
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
12/30/2011 1:57:28PM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
24800 12/30/2011 000252 000252 LOWE'S BUSINESS ACCOUNT (Continued) Total : 798.95
24801 12/30/2011 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 4518549 001.076.300 IRRIGATION PROJECT: PARTS REC 2 871 05
24802
24803
24804
24805
12/30/2011 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3
12/30/2011 000406 SPOKANE REGIONAL CVB
Dec 2011
Dec 2011
17708
12/30/2011 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 1361390-2681-1
1361391-2681-9
12/30/2011 000487 YMCA OF THE INLAND NW
14 Vouchers for bank code: apbank
14 i/ouchers in this report
November 2011
Total :
001.076.302 WATER CHARGES: PARKS
101.042.000 WATER CHARGES:PW
Total :
001.076.305 CVB 2012 RENEWAL OF CERTIFICf
Total :
001.076.305 WASTE MGMT:CENTERPLACE
001.016.000 WASTE MGMT:PRECINCT
Total :
001.076.302 NOVEMBER 2011:OPERATION ANC
Total :
Bank total :
Total vouchers :
2,871.05
32.95
15.07
48.02
10.00
10.00
739.38
285.27
1,024.65
2,334.00
2,334.00
20,482.12
20,482.12
Page: 2
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
01/03/2012 9:47:27AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: pk-ref
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
5388 12/31/2011 002932 CUB SCOUT PACK 464 REFUND 001.237.10. DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUP 210.00
5389
5390
5391
12/31/2011 002933 SPENCER, NELLIE
12/31/2011 002934 SPOKANEASSOC. OF REALTORS
12/31/2011 002869 SWANSON, KIRSTEN
4 Vouchers for bank code: pk-ref
4 Vouchers in this report
I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury,
that the materials have been furnished,the services
rendered,or the labor performed as described herein
and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid
obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that
I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim.
Finance Director Date
Mayor Date
Council Member Date
Total :
REFUND 001.237.10. DEPOSIT REFUND: FIRESIDE LOUP
Total :
REFUND 001.237.10. DEPOSIT REFUND: ROOM 109
Total :
REFUND 001.237.10. DEPOSIT REFUND:GREAT ROOM
Total :
Bank total :
Total vouchers :
210.00
210.00
210.00
52.00
52.00
210.00
210.00
682.00
682.00
Page: 1
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
01/04/2012 10:24:38AM Spokane Valley
Bank code: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount
3795 1/5/2012 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A PLAN Ben41764 001.231.14. 401A:Payment 22,591.58
Total: 22,591.58
3796 1/5/2012 000682 EFTPS Ben41766 001.231.11. FEDERALTAXES:Payment 28,821.46
Total: 28,821.46
3797 1/5/2012 000145 VANTAGEPOINTTRANSFERAGENTS,457 PL�Ben41768 001.231.18. 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION:Payn 5,132.94
Total: 5,132.94
3798 1/5/2012 000162 VANTAGETRANSFERAGENTS,401AEXEC PL Ben41770 001.231.14. 401 EXEC PLAN:Payment 1,026.67
Total: 1,026.67
3809 1/5/2012 000682 EFTPS Ben41774 001.231.11. FEDERALTAXES:Payment 996.58
Total: 996.58
24806 1/5/2012 000120 AWC Ben41754 001.231.16. HEALTH PLANS:Payment 105,682.83
Ben41772 001.231.16. HEALTH PLANS(COUNCIL):Payment 8,240.18
Total: 113,923.01
24807 1/5/2012 000165 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Ben41756 001.231.15. PERS:Payment 54,980.56
Total: 54,980,56
24808 1/5/2012 002227 IDAHO TAX COMMISSION Ben41758 001.231.50. IDAHO STATE TAX BASE:Payment 1,390.74
Total: 1,390.74
24809 1/5/2012 000164 LABOR&INDUSTRIES Ben41752 001231.17. LABOR&INDUSTRIES:Payment 18,539.97
Total: 18,539.97
24810 1/5/2012 000699 WACOUNCILCO/CITYEMPLOYEES Ben41760 001.231.21. UNION DUES:Payment 2,205.53
Total: 2,205.53
24811 1/5/2012 002574 WASHINGTON TRUST BANK Ben41762 001.231.20. BERG20110-02-03952-4:Payment 869.48
Total: 869.48
11 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 250,478.52
11 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 250,478.52
Page: 1
_ _
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 01-10-2012 Department DirectorApproval : �
Item: Check all that apply: � consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Period Ending December 30, 2011:
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
BudgeUFinancial impacts:
Gross: $ 174,478.58
Benefits: $ 137,949.19
Total payroll $ 312,427.77
STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: January 10, 2012 Department Director Approval: �
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin report. ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 12-001 Amending SVMC
20.80.030(F) - Boundary Line Adjustments
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: FILE NUMBER: CTA-05-11
A City initiated text amendment proposing to amend Section 20.80.030(F) of the Spokane Valley
Municipal Code (SVMC) to modify the application and drawing requirements for boundary line
adjustments.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 19.30.040 development regulation text amendments
PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: Advanced to 2�d Reading December 27, 2011.
BACKGROUND: The text amendment to Section 20.80.030(F) would allow the Community
Development Director discretion in requiring a Record of Survey for boundary line adjustments.
Staff presented the proposed amendment to the Planning Commission at a study session on
November 10, 2011. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the amendment on
December 8, 2011 and recommended approval in a unanimous vote. An administrative report
was provided to City Council on December 13, 2011. First reading occurred December 27, 2011.
APPROVAL CRITERIA: Section 17.80.150(6) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code provides
approval criteria for text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. The criterion
stipulates that the proposed amendment must be consistent with the applicable provisions of the
Comprehensive Plan and bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety, welfare, and
protection of the environment.
OPTIONS: Approve the ordinance with or without modifications.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance 12-001 amending
SVMC 20.80.030(F) regarding Boundary Line Adjustments.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None
STAFF CONTACT: Martin Palaniuk, Planning Technician
ATTACHMENTS:
(1) Draft Ordinance
(2) Planning Commission Findings
(3) Draft Planning Commission Minutes
1 of 1
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 12-001
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION
20.80.030 RELATING TO THE APPLICATION AND DRAWING REQUIREMENTS FOR
BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENTS,AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley (City) adopted the Uniform Development Code (UDC) pursuant to
Ordinance 07-015, on September 25, 2007; and
WHEREAS, the Uniform Development Code (UDC)became effective on October 28,2007; and
WHEREAS, such regulations are authorized by RCW 36.70A; and
WHEREAS, SVMC 20.80.030 of the SVMC was adopted by Ordinance 07-015 and subsequently amended by
Ordinance 09-002; and
WHEREAS, the amendments set forth below are consistent with the goals and policies of the City's
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, after reviewing the Environmental Checklists, the City issued a Determination of Non-
significance (DNS) for the proposals, published the DNS in the Valley News Herald, posted the DNS at City
Hall, and mailed the DNS to all affected public agencies; and
WHEREAS, the City provided a copy of the proposed amendment to Washington State Department of
Commerce (DOC)initiating a 60-day comment period pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106; and
WHEREAS, SVMC 20.80.030 as amended,bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety and welfare
and protection of the environment and
WHEREAS, on November 10, 2011,the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS, On December 8, 2011, the Commission held a public hearing and received evidence,
information,public testimony and a staff report with a recommendation; and
WHEREAS, On December 8, 2011, the Commission deliberated and provided a recommendation; and
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2011, Council reviewed the proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS, on December 27, 2011, Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed
amendment.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL SPECIFICALLY ORDAINS AS SET FORTH BELOW:
Section One: SVMC 20.80.030 (F)is amended as follows:
. A record of survey of the property ma, b�quired bv the Community Development Director. The need for a
survev will be determined based on an evaluation of the number of�arcels, le�al descri�tions, a��urtenances,
Ordinance 12-001 Relating to Boundary Line Adjustments Page 1 of 3
DRAFT
Idisputed or a�arent lines of ownership, and setbacks. .;n�'��ee���°� �r '��„„a�,-�, ';„° �,a;,,�*me��t�
:,n�s*�e�f��e���e�e��t��e��e�t���If required, �the survey must be
completed by a professional land surveyor licensed in the state of Washington. (Ord. 09-002 § 6, 2009; Ord.
07-015 § 4, 2007).
Section Two: All other provisions of SVMC Title 20 not specifically referenced hereto shall remain in full
force and effect.
Section Three: Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrases of this Ordinance should be held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not
affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance.
Section Four: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after the
publication of the Ordinance, or a summary thereof, occurs in the official newspaper of the City as provided by
law.
Passed by the City Council this day of January, 2012.
Mayor, Thomas E. Towey
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance 12-001 Relating to Boundary Line Adjustments Page 2 of 3
���15 11 03;12p gail � 509-924-3412 p.1
aa I
� ■
���s
FIlYDINGS AND RECOMMENDAT�ONS �
OF TH� SPOKA,NE VALLEY PIlANNI�TG COlI�IlVIISSION '
Decernber�,2011.
,
Backgrou»d: �
A. The Uniform Development Code was adopted in September 2007 and became effective on
October 28,2007. I�
B. Chapler 19.30.040 SVMC allows code text amendments to be submitted at any tinne.
C. Following the adaption of the code it became apparent that the requi►�ement for a Record of
Su�vey for siYnple boundary line adj�stments was inefficient and burdensome.
D. The Planning Conimission held a public hearing on December 8"', 2011. The Planning
Commission recommended approval of the following arnendment to the SVMC 20.80_Q30 (F) Ii
i
Application and drawing requirements,as follows: i
a. A record of survey.of the property �r�a�� E�e �eguireel by fhe �vmmuni�v �evelopn7ei�t
�irector. T?ze e�eeci for a su�vev tia�ill �e determine� based on an e��aluation of the ��umber of '
pa�cels, Iv�al LI6SCCI�,C1081S, ap�urteitances. disputed or a�raarc;nt liraes of odvnershi�, and
setbacl:s. �,..�� �,_ __.. i_r_,a F _ e,__.,a„Y�: i:..� ^a��t,-=�^*�o-�sl�+��d-:s�a�te�--€�e�e i
. .. .. -r- - -- -- ---� ��..., (
�:T.-.? ., _ __ __��^+�° __ti�=^,.�^°���►;nA--If required. �the survey must be completed
, 'b �'['^� r r- �
by a professional land surveyor licensed in the state of Washington.
lFindings:
The Planning Commission finds the prop�sed text amendrnents to be consistent with the applicable
provisions of the City's Comprehensive Plan_ '
G-1: Create a governme�t that places a premi�m on providing effective eustomer service. i
LUP-1.3: Review and revise as necessary, existing iand use re�ulations to provide for innovation and �
flexitiility in the design of new residential developments, accessory dwelling units and in-fill
development.
LUP-13.1: Ma7cimize efficiency of the development review process by continuously evaIuating the !
permitting process and madify�ng as ap�ropriate_ i
� �
EDG-7: Maintaui a regulatoly environment that offers fEexibility, consistency, predicta.bility and
clear direction.
EDP-7.1: Evaluate, monitor and improve development standards to promote compatibility between
adjacenC land uses; and update perrttitting processes to ensure that they are eqtiitable, cost effective,
and expeditious.
The Planning Commission finds the proposed text amendments bene£ts pvblic health, safety, welfare, I'
and protection ofthe environment: �
State la�v does not require a survey for a boundary line adjustment. Soma jurisdictions requixe a survey;
some maintain discretion in requiring a survey and some do not require a survey. The best interest of#he i
citizens and City of Spokane Valley is served by allowing the Community Development Director the �
discretion to require a record of survey tivhen the situation warrants.
�
;
Dec 15 11 03:13p gail 509-924-3412 p.2 i
�
�
Findings and Recommendations of Ehe Spokane Valley Planning Commission C7'A-0S-I 1 L
i
Recon�mendation: �
The 5pol:ane Valley Planning Comrnissiozt� adopts the findings in the staff report and recommends
approval to City Council for the foll�wing code te�ct amendment to the SV1V1C:
a. A record of survey of the properly mav be required b�� the Communiiv Dew�eloptnetit Direator. �
T�te need for a survey wiEi be detarmined based on an e��aivatior of the ���mhec ��f��rcels, le�al
descriptions ap�urtep�ances dispuied or a�pac-ent ]ines of ownershi� and setbacks. �e
�.�, .,,��„+i, i
,. � , - �
t�e��a-g�e�e�y-l�-�e--�f re�uired. �ths survey must be completed by a peofessional land surveyor
]icensed in the state of Washington.
Findings ar�d Conclusians reviewed and appro�-ed on this Sth day of December,2011 'I
I
ohn G. Carroll, airrnan
�'�TEST �
,i� � � I'I
; i
f�.�` ,% ��,�'1� �~� �., �
Dea na Griffith,Admini�t��ve Assistant
t
�
I
�
I
i
�
i
;
i
�
Page 2 oF2 �
i
i
�
I
Spokane Valley Planning Commission
DRAFT Minutes
Council Chambers — City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave.
December 8, 2011
L CALL TO ORDER
Chair Carroll called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.
IL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance
IIL ROLL CALL
Commissioners Bates, Carroll, Mann, Neill, Sands and Stoy were present. Commissioner Hall
was absent.
Staff attending the meeting: John Hohman, Community Development Director; Scott Kuhta,
Planner Manager; Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner; Martin Palaniuk, Planning Technician;
Cari Hinshaw, Office Assistant; Deanna Griffith, Administrative Assistant
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Commissioner Sands made a motion to approve the agenda as presented. This motion was
passed unanimously.
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
There were no minutes to approve.
VL PUBLIC COMMENT � —
There was no public comment.
VIL COMMISSION REPORTS
The Commissioners had nothing to report
VIIL ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
Planning Manager Kuhta reported the City Council had amended the Commission's Rules of
Procedure.
IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS
A. Unfinished Business: Continued Public Hearing – CTA-04-ll Proposed amendments
to Title 22, Landscaping and Fencing.
Assistant Planner Karen Kendall gave a brief recap of the questions which the
Commissioners had previously requested clarification on, which were maintenance of the
street trees along the public right-of-way (ROW) are the responsibility of the property
except for a portion of Sprague and Appleway west of University and Appleway Blvd east
of Tschirley. Tree staking was the other subject and Ms. Kendall stated the best
information she was able to find was supplied at the last meeting from the University of
Colorado which stated that staking is supported however only for a short period of time to
stabilize the tree while it matures.
12-08-ll Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 2
B. New Business: Public Hearing for CTA-05-11, Proposed text amendment to Title 20,
requirements for Boundary Line Adjustments
Planning Tech Martin Palaniuk made a presentation to the Commissioners regarding the
proposed language change to Title 20 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC)
20.80.030 (F) regarding the requirements for a record of survey for all Boundary Line
Adjustments (BLA) .
Mr Palaniuk explained that the proposed amendment would allow the Community
Development Director discretion in requiring a record of survey for simple boundary line
adjustments. The current code language requires a record of survey for all BLAs. Staff has
determined that in less complicated situations a BLA can be accomplished without a record
of survey. The Community Development Director would have the ability to wave the need
for a record of survey when there would be two parcels or less, simple legal descriptions,
no complicating easements or appurtenances, no owner disputes, or any setback issues.
Chair Carroll opened the public hearing at 7:38 p.m.
Anthony Lazanas, 10606 E Empire: Mr. Lazanas thanked staff for the work on this
amendment and spoke in favor of this amendment.
Chuck Simpson, 909 N Argonne Rd: Mr Simpson stated he was a licensed surveyor in the
State of Washington and was speaking in support of the proposed amendment. Mr.
Simpson shared several examples where a record of survey would not have been necessary
in order to complete the BLA.
Seeing no one else who wished to testify the chairman closed the public hearing at 7:45
p.m.
The Commissioners deliberated and asked Mr. Palaniuk to explain the basic process of the
BLA. Discussion surrounded when drawings would not be required, how counter staff
would determine when a to defer the BLA to the director, how much time could be saved,
and that our consultant reviews all legal descriptions and surveys turned into the City.
Commissioner Sands made a motion to recommend approval of CTA-OS-11 to the City
Council. This motion was approved unanimously.
After review Commissioner Bates made a motion to approve the findings as presented.
This motion was approved unanimously.
X. GOOD OF THE ORDER
Commissioners and staff thanked Commissioner Joe Mann for his years of service to the City
serving as a Planning Commissioner for the last three years.
XL ADJOURNMENT
The being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 7:52 p.m.
SUBMITTED: APPROVED:
Deanna Griffith, Secretary John G. Carroll, Chairperson
12-08-ll Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: January 10, 2012 Department Director Approval: �
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Pines Road ITS Project #0061- Design
Phase Services
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.45 —Architectural and Engineering Services.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: (1) Approval of application for federal grant funding
for the Pines Road ITS Improvement Project on September 12, 2006; (2) Approval of 2011-2016
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) on June 29, 2010 and the 2012-2017 TIP
on June 28, 2011, both of which include the Pines ITS project; (3) Info memo on Dec. 13, 2011;
(4) Admin report on Dec 27, 2011.
BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley received a Congestion Mitigation / Air Quality
(CMAQ) Grant for design and construction of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)
improvements on Pines Road between Sprague Avenue and Trent Avenue. The Project will
install fiber optic cable, traffic cameras and connect traffic signals to the Spokane Regional
Transportation Management Center (SRTMC). The Transpo Group was chosen as the most
qualified firm through an RFQ selection process.
Staff has negotiated the attached scope of work for design services. The fee for the design
work is $199,763.
While discussing the scope of work during the December 27, 2011 meeting, a question was
raised as to why the Pines Road intersections at Sprague, Mission and Mansfield are not
included in the scope of work. The answer is that those three intersections with Pines Rd are
already connected to the SRTMC via fiber optic cable.
OPTIONS: 1) Approve the execution of a consultant agreement with the Transpo Group for
design of the Pines ITS Project; 2) Provide additional direction to staff.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager, or designee, to
execute a consultant agreement with the Transpo Group in the amount of $199,763 for design
services on the Pines Road ITS Project.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This project is currently federally funded at 86.5% up to
$1,801,900. The City match is $281,221. Below is a summary of the project funding and
project budget by phase.
� . . . � . . . - . �
CMAQ Grant $ 1,801,900 Preliminary Engineering $ 239,900
City Match for Grant $ 281,221 Right of Way $ 250,000
Total $ 2,083,121 Construction $ 1,593,221
Tota I $ 2,083,121
STAFF CONTACT: Steve Worley, Senior Capital Projects Engineer
Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS Scope of Work and Fee for design services
Exhibit A—Scope of Services, Fee & Schedule
Client Name: City of Spokane Valley
Project Name: N Pines Road ITS Improvements
Exhibit Dated: December 19, 2011 TG: 09257.PR
Scope of Services: N Pines Road ITS Improvements
Introduction
The proposed scope of work detailed below is based on discussions with the City. This scope of work
consists of preparing Plans, Specification, and Estimate (PS&E)documents for the ITS and signal system
components along N Pines Road (SR 27) in compliance with the ITS Strategic plan. The corridor and limits
of the project are detailed in the scope of work below.
Scope of Work
The following presents Transpo's (consultant) general work program for ITS PS&E design. The proposed
work scope includes the following four primary work elements:
• Task 1 — Project Assessment
0 1.1 —Corridor Assessment and Design Plan Review
0 1.2— Utility Coordination
0 1.3— Environmental NEPA/SEPA Forms
0 1.4— Right-of-Way Acquisition Analysis
• Task 2— ITS Equipment Recommendation
• Task 3— N Pines Rd/E Mission Ave Intersection Analysis
• Task 4— Pines Corridor ITS Design
0 4.1 — Data collection and base map development
0 4.2—50% Engineering Design
0 4.3—90% Engineering Design
0 4.4— Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E)
0 4.5—Structural Analysis of CCTV Mounting
0 4.6— Bidding Services
• Task 5— Project Administration
Extra Services (currently not included in this scope of work) may include Surveying, Geotechnical
engineering, and Construction Support Services.
Project Limits: From E Sprague Ave to E Trent Ave (SR 290) along the corridor of N Pines Road (SR 27).
Schedule
We propose a project schedule of nine months to complete the above work from the time of receiving the
Notice to Proceed (NTP). This includes all meetings and review times. Review times are estimated at 2
weeks per review. Stakeholders meetings will be negotiated separately if needed.
09257.PR 1 12/19/2011
Task 1 — Project Assessment
1.1 — Corridor Assessment & Design Plan Review
The purpose of this subtask is to conduct a detailed inventory of conduits and junction boxes for the
purpose to identify potential conflicts on the corridor and the interconnect routes. This task will also assess
the capacity of the existing conduit runs from the cabinet to the nearest junction box and connection
locations. Additional meetings with key stakeholders will occur per the City's request. These meetings are
not covered by this Scope of Work.
Transpo will develop a standard check list (form)that will be used to inventory and evaluate each
intersection control cabinet. This inventory will become the basis for documenting the condition of the
equipment and the need to replace any of the existing equipment. A key component of the decision is the
availability of Right-of-Way and utility conflicts. Transpo will identify potential Right-of-Way and easement
needs.
To be furnished by City:
• Location of existing communications lines and existing conduits runs
• Existing as-builts for signals within defined projects limits
• Existing GIS base mapping
Deliverable:
• Summary memo of corridor evaluation
• Corridor checklist and inventory
1.2— Utility Coordination
Transpo will coordinate work with the utility companies to address any conflicts during the design. Typically,
the utility companies will provide as-builts or mark locations in the field. Transpo will contact the utility
locator (811-Number)to obtain plans and field locate markings. After the completion of the utility locates,
Transpo will conduct field reviews at locations where new ITS devices are proposed (CCTV camera poles
and ITS cabinets)to identify any potential conflicts with the existing utilities. Transpo will identify any
conflicts with the proposed design and will propose alternatives to the City. This subtask does not include
any utility relocation design or surveying.
1.3— Environmental NEPA/SEPA Forms
Transpo will assist in providing any necessary ITS related information in order to complete NEPA/SEPA
forms. Developing any Environmental documents or review of documents is not considered part of this
scope of work. If full environmental review is needed, Transpo will obtain a sub-consultant and prepare an
amendment to this scope of services.
1.4— Right-of-Way Acquisition Analysis
Transpo will utilize GIS maps, provided by the City, to identify locations where there may be potential Right-
of-Way (R/W)conflicts. Where possible, Transpo will make recommendations and propose alternatives to
avoid any R/W acquisition. Transpo will submit to the City a memo including the findings of the R/W review
on or before the 50% design submittal.
Where obtaining R/W is necessary and after the City's approval, Transpo will work with a sub-consultant to
perform the following tasks for up to four (4)sites:
• R/W Investigation for partial take or construction easement
• Boundary/Topographic design survey
• Property boundary calculations
• Field survey for Topography
• Research for Deed Review
• Topo Plan / Drafting
• Research and obtaining up to four Title Reports
09257.PR 2 12/19/2011
• R/W plan preparation per LAG manual requirements
o Survey line or centerline of the alignment
o The old and new R/W limits with sufficient ties to the survey line to allow for legal descriptions
of the areas to be acquired
o Show all rights to be acquired, for example easements and permits
o Show the ownership boundaries of the parcels with rights to be acquired
o Show the parcel identification number
o Show the area of the parcel to be acquired
o Show the area of the remainder
Deliverables:
• Memo summarizing the findings of the R/W evaluation
• Recommendations memo
• A preliminary identification of new R/W limits shown on plan sheets
• Estimated value for partial take or construction easement
• R/W plans for release of R/W funds from WSDOT
Upon completion of this subtask, if additional R/W is identified and agreed to by the City, Transpo will
prepare an amendment to this scope of services for Right-of-Way acquisition. The scope of work may
include coordination with property owners and assistance with acquisition of Right-of-Way and will be
performed by a sub-consultant.
Task 2 — ITS Equipment and Recommendation
Purpose: Upon the completion of the Project Assessment, Transpo will use the inventory from Task 1 to
develop a list of recommended ITS equipment and corridor improvements focusing on new fiber optic
communications, CCTV cameras, and data collection stations. Transpo will lay out the concept of the
design with alternatives for the City to review. The design concepts, building upon the general locations
from the ITS Strategic Plan, will include detailed reviews of the communication network, data collection
location and traffic monitoring cameras. Transpo will submit alternatives for the future fiber network
infrastructure along the corridor(conventional trenching, micro-trenching, wireless connection or aerially).
The submittal will include a comparison between the proposed alternatives.
A meeting with the City will be conducted to finalize the ITS equipment and installation locations before
design proceeds forward. This task will use the assessment of the existing conduit runs to determine
additional needs for conduit connection to existing signal cabinets and infrastructure within the project
limits.
Transpo will perform a field investigation including line of sight requirements for CCTV and mounting height
using a bucket truck at the proposed mounting site. Arrangements for the use of a bucket truck and driver
plus any required traffic control will be provided by the City.
Deliverables:
• Corridor recommendation document including maps
• Images or video clips at each of the proposed CCTV camera locations showing the line of sight
Task 3 — N Pines Rd/E Mission Ave Intersection Analysis
The signal at N Pines Rd/E Mission Ave intersection currently operates on a split-phase basis. The City of
Spokane Valley would like to improve the signal operation at this intersection by reducing queue length and
average delay. Transpo will evaluate the signal operations of the intersection for the existing and future
conditions and recommend potential improvements as necessary. Scenarios that will be evaluated for the
future condition will include, but may not be limited to:
• Reconfiguring existing signal phasing and intersection geometry to remove split phase requirement
• Adding southbound right-turn lane
09257.PR 3 12/19/2011
Upon completion of the analysis, Transpo will prepare a Traffic Operation Memo summarizing existing and
future Level Of Service (LOS), average delays, queue length, and volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio for AM and
PM peak hours. The memo will include a comparison between the different scenarios, prepared as part of
this analysis, by listing the advantages and the disadvantages of each potential improvement. Additionally,
the memo will include recommendations for improvements.
Transpo will obtain the AM and PM Synchro network from the City and calculate the existing AM and PM
peak hour Level Of Service (LOS), average delays, queue length, and volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio. Future
AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at this intersection will be estimated by applying an average annual
growth rate as determined by the City.
This task does not include preparation of plans and specifications. If the City selects a recommended
alternative that requires plans, Transpo will prepare an amendment to this scope.
To be furnished by City:
• Existing Synchro network (AM/PM Peak Hour)
• Existing traffic volumes
• Assumptions for projecting future year volumes
Deliverable:
• Traffic Operation Memo summarizing existing and future Level Of Service (LOS), average delays,
queue length, and volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio for AM and PM peak hours as well as
recommendations for improvements
Task 4 — Pines Corridor ITS Design
Purpose: Upon the completion of Task 2, a list of ITS equipment and locations along with conduit and fiber
connectivity will be approved by the City. The design corridor improvements are to include new conduit
route, new fiber optic communications, and CCTV camera installations. The project limits and proposed
improvements are outlined below.
Corridor Limits: From E Sprague Ave to E Trent Ave (SR 290)along the corridor of N Pines Rd (SR 27).
The potential ITS improvements for this corridor include but are not limited to:
A. Fiber Communication System for approximately 2.7 miles. Fiber infrastructure will be determined
with the City after field investigation and using the City's ITS strategic plan.
B. Trench conduit from along N Pines Rd between E Sprague Ave at the south and E Trent Ave (SR
290) at the north. It is assumed that existing conduit will be used at the I-90 interchange.
C. Two Signal Controllers will be connected to the communication and Ethernet Switches.
Intersections from South to North include:
1. E Broadway Ave & N Pines Rd (SR 27)
2. E Trent Ave (SR 290) & N Pines Rd (SR 27)
D. Up to three CCTV Camera locations will be recommended and connected by Ethernet and be
compatible with the existing system. Locations and the number of CCTV cameras will be
determined with the City after field investigation and using the City's ITS strategic plan.
E. Up to two count stations to be installed between E Sprague Ave and E Trent Ave (SR 290).
Locations and number of the count stations will be determined with the City after field investigation
and using the City's ITS strategic plan.
F. Identify connection point and location of fiber termination cabinets.
The following subtasks are proposed:
09257.PR 4 12/19/2011
4.1 - Data Collection and Basemap Development
Transpo will work with the City of Spokane Valley to assess the conduit along the project corridor with the
detailed inventory. Transpo will incorporate base map information available from the City—including both
intersection/road projects and utility projects where spare conduits have been installed. Transpo staff will
then walk the corridor with City staff to verify the location of the junction boxes accessing the spare conduit,
if any.
The base map will identify information required for the contractor to successfully locate the proposed
improvements. This may include the location of existing right of way, roadside features (including curbs,
sidewalks, planters strips, trees,junction boxes, etc.), and major traffic signal equipment.
Existing as-builts and project data provided by the City will be used. Underground utilities will only be
located in areas where construction work is anticipated to be required along the corridor, based on
preliminary engineering.
Deliverable:
• Roll plot of base map—hard copy.
4.2 - 50% Engineering Design
This subtask will focus on the development of a preliminary (50%) engineering design for the ITS elements
described earlier.
The base maps prepared in the previous task will be used to prepare the preliminary engineering drawings
for the proposed ITS system project. The preliminary (50%)engineering drawings will show general
location of existing and proposed equipment with construction notes and preliminary layout of restoration
items such as roadway, sidewalk and landscaping. No wiring details and/or schedules will be prepared at
this stage. 50% plans will be submitted for review and comment by the City. The cost estimate will be
prepared and show list of bid items, unit costs, and quantities.
If the City decides to implement improvements resulting from Task 3, the ITS design will account for these
changes; however, signal design and roadway improvements such as channelization are not included in
this scope of work.
Deliverables:
• Preliminary (50%) engineering ITS plan drawings
• Engineer's 50% opinion of cost.
• Five copies of the plans, 11 x17 size in pdf format.
To be furnished by the City:
• Coordination, review, and summary of Agency reviews to meet schedule
4.3 - 90% Engineering Design
This subtask will develop 90% design documents including plans, specifications, and estimate for the ITS
elements detailed in the 50% engineering design task above. The City comments from the 50%
engineering design review will be incorporated into the 90% design.
The 90% design shall include: equipment plans layout, construction notes, restoration of roadway,
sidewalk, and landscaping, erosion control, wiring details, fiber optic splice diagrams, details sheets, details
of non-standard design features, specifications, and estimate. Plans, specifications and cost estimate will
be submitted for the City's review.
Deliverables:
• 90% engineering ITS design plans, specifications, cost estimate, and bid item list.
• Responses to City's 50% review comments
• Five copies of the plans, 11 x 17 size in pdf format.
09257.PR 5 12/19/2011
To be furnished by the City:
- Coordination, review, and summary of Agency reviews to meet schedule
4.4 - Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E)
This subtask will develop Ad-Ready final PS&E documents. City and WSDOT comments from the 90%
engineering design submittal will be incorporated into the final PS&E documents.
The final design shall include stamped and signed plan sheets for all the plans including but not limited to
communication and equipment layout, construction notes, restoration of roadway, sidewalk, and
landscaping, erosion control, wiring details, fiber optic splice diagrams, details sheets, specifications, and
estimate.
Special Provisions: Contract documents, required FHWA Division 1, amendments, Division 2-9, standard
drawing details, wage rates.
Deliverables:
• One final set of PS&E documents.
• One copy of drawings on CD or DVD in .pdf and Autocad format, and reproducible specifications
and cost estimate.
• Five copies ofthe plans in 11x17 size format.
• Responses to city's 90% review comments.
To be furnished by the City:
• Coordination, review, and summary of Agency reviews to meet schedule
4.5 - Bidding Services
Transpo will respond to bidder questions, prepare addenda as required, evaluate bids, prepare bid tabs
and recommend award.
Task 5 — Project Administration
This task includes attendance and participation in project meetings, ongoing communication with the
project team, monthly invoicing and progress report preparation and internal project management and
oversight. Progress reports and invoices will inform the City regarding project budget status, work
accomplished for the billing period, money spent for the billing period, and work to be completed for the
next billing period. Any issues requiring the City's attention would also be raised.
Oualitv Control. Transpo will follow our quality control (QC) process to ensure the plans have been
independently reviewed prior to submittal. The process will include provisions for checking calculations,
plans, specifications and design reports and ensure comments received from the City are incorporated in
the plans as agreed upon.
The main objective of this task is to ensure the project is completed on time and within budget based on the
scope of work.
• Track schedule adherence
• Track budget expenditure
• Prepare and submit progress reports and invoicing
• Internal resource allocation forthe project
• Quality control and review
Deliverable:
• Up to Two (2) project meetings; monthly invoices and progress reports
• One meeting for 90% comments resolution. 50% comment resolution will be via email
09257.PR 6 12/19/2011
Design Assumptions
Included are additional design assumptions that supplement the other design assumptions listed in the
scope of work above:
• This project will have approved environmental review and does not need additional environmental
support other than the submitted checklist.
• The design intent is to stay within R/W to maintain both schedule and budget for this project.
• Legal and physical access to site provided.
• Design standard drawings used will be City of Spokane Valley. In absence of the City of Spokane
Valley standards, Spokane County design standards will be used. In absence of Spokane County
design standards, WSDOT standards will be used.
• The intent of the basemapping is to show where physical improvements are located in the field so
that the contractor can construct and estimate ITS design elements. It is understood that the
basemapping is information from the city's GIS and As-Builts and not surveyed information.
Therefore the accuracy of the information is only as good as the base files.
• No corridor stationing is included as part of this work. Known monuments will be used for any
installation of new structures.
• North arrow shown on plan sheets will be shown pointed up or to the right.
• Plans shall be in 11x17 size. Corridor plan sheets will have a scale of 1: 50'. Zoom in of
intersections will be at a 1:20 scale.
• It is assumed the installation of CCTV will be mounted on existing signal mast arms or signal
luminaire arm. Where new poles are required the specifications will require the contractor to
provide the structural design. No structural design is included in this scope.
• It is assumed civil improvements such as sidewalk repair, landscaping, curb and gutter can be
addressed using existing standard details. This scope of work does not include special details for
these design elements.
• Contract Schedule is based on a tight timeframe. Transpo will notify client of any potential delays
in writing. Time delays from the client on receipt of information/assistance will affect this schedule.
• No potholing is included in this scope of work. If additional work is amended to this scope at a
later date requiring utility locates, the city will call to furnish required field locate services at
locations specified by Transpo (general one-call locate service number. 1-800-424-5555)
• City will coordinate with project stakeholders and confirm design review period and timeframe can
be met for all reviewers. The design review may include but not limited to WSDOT, Spokane
County, utilities, rail roads and transit agencies.
• Added design submittals beyond those included within this scope will require an amended scope
and fee.
• The following signal controllers are not included in this scope:
o E Sprague Ave & N Pines Rd (SR 27)
o E Mission Ave & N Pines Rd (SR 27)
o E Mansfield Ave & N Pines Rd (SR 27)
09257.PR 7 12/19/2011
Additional Services not currentiv in Scope
• Preparation of signal design or channelization plans for N Pines Rd/E Mission Ave intersection
• Coordination with the property owner(s)for R/W purchase
• Structural analysis or design
• Geotech analysis
Construction Support Services
Purpose: The construction support services are to help the city with the construction contractor as well as
with the installation of equipment.
Transpo offers a broad range of construction support services for the project. For this project we anticipate
providing assistance in the following areas:
1. Contractor inquiries (request for information)after project award
2. Equipment and material review
3. Construction inspection
4. Change orders if any
5. System integration assistance
6. As-builts and system documentation
7. Review of OTDR test results
The duration of the construction management services is expected to cover construction work to be
performed in 2012 and 2013. The support services listed above will be estimated and submitted separately
after review and agreement with the City of Spokane Valley is reached. Spokane Valley reserves the right
to expand the Scope of Work for this project to include engineering services for construction inspection
and/or construction management.
09257.PR 8 12/19/2011
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: January 10, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Street and Stormwater Maintenance Contract Renewal
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Street and Stormwater Maintenance Contract Approval
on April 24, 2007, Contract Renewal in 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011.
BACKGROUND: The City conducted a RFP process in March 2007. In April 2007 the Council
awarded the contract to Poe Asphalt Paving by the following motion:
=�. �Totioii C'azisideration: C�oi�tract A�ro��al for Sn�eet ai�d Storri���=ater niaiiiteiiaii�e Slld RZ�7�ill' - NZII
Kersten. It�t•as i��o��erl 1 ti� C'nrr3�cil�iier��Ue�• :llrr�isn3� a�irl secotirlerl tn a��rrrrl t]�e cn3�tract tn Poe As�l�rr�t
Prri•i�i�1F� C131 Cli71D2f31t Y��IT� fYCEfC� S�,I:'�;��9, a�irl rrrrtliori=e tl�e Citr•_l�rr3�rrger ar rTesi��ree ta sigrr rlie
rnt�trrrcr rrrir�frrtrrre scl�eri-Z ear re1rE��rrhle nptiapr,s rr,s pra��irlcrl ipr rlie RFP elocrrltieirrs. Publi� L4'orks
Director Kersten e�plaii�ed that tl�ere ha��e beei�no chan�es since tl�is���as last discusse�i t}efore C'ouncil.
Deplit�� �Ta�or Ta�lor in�ited pu�lic coiimieiits: i�a �ozzui�eiits ��'ZI'� QtfZI'�C�. Zatf' U�• �lrclrr�iirrtio3�: ��r
fa�•o�•: �'�ia�iir��orrs. U��oser�:�o3�e. .�Usterrtia�is:��a�ie. _1lntia�i carrrer�.
The contract was for one year with seven one-year renewal options which may be exercised by the
City. Poe Asphalt Paving provided an excellent level of service during 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and
2011.
The contract amount for Street and Stormwater Maintenance in 2011 was $1,545,119 and will
remain at $1,545,119 for 2012 for those services. In 2010 Council approved a snow removal
contract to Poe Asphalt Inc. in the amount of $700,000. We were able to complete a separate bid
process last year for the majority of the snow plowing work involving graders and have conducted
the same bid process this year. As a result, last year we only spent $132,291 with Poe which was
primarily for drivers in the City snowplow trucks and two graders with wings. Additionally, since
snow plowing is not considered a public work the hourly rates for snow plowing will be at 90% of
the contract rate. We are requesting an increase in the contract amount of $140,000 for the snow
removal operations which would come from the approved snow removal budget. This would bring
Poe's total contract amount to $1,685,119. This does not increase the overall Street Fund budget
for 2012.
Council received an informational memo on November 27th, administration report on December 6tn
additional information on December 13th and an additional administrative report on December 27tn
Labor and equipment with the profit and overhead charge will result in a 0.3% increase from the
2011 costs. When materials are included the total costs of the work will decrease 6.8% from the
2011 costs.
OPTIONS: Renew the contract, or provide staff with further direction.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve the contract to Poe Asphalt Inc. in an
amount not to exceed $1,685,119 for Street and Stormwater maintenance and Snow Removal and
authorize the City Manager to sign the contract.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The contract will be funded by the approved 2012 budget.
STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten
ATTACHMENTS: 2012 draft contact renewal letter, Poe Direct Rates
S`pokane
�(.�.11� 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
�::
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhallC�spokanevalley.org
January XX, 2012
Poe Asphalt Paving, Inc.
2732 N Beck Road
Post Falls, ID 83854
Re: Implementation of 2012 option year, Contract No. 09-003, for Agreement for Street and
Stormwater Maintenance and Repair Services, No. 07-008, executed March 13, 2007
Dear Mr. Griffith:
The City executed a contract for provision of Street and Stormwater Maintenance and Repair
Services on May 11, 2007. The Request for Proposal states that it was for one year, with seven
optional one-year terms possible if the parties mutually agree to exercise the options each year.
The City would like to exercise the 2012 option year of the Agreement. The Compensation as
outlined in Exhibit A, 2012 Cost Proposal, includes the labor increases and other cost changes
negotiated and shall not exceed $1,685,119. This is the fifth of seven possible option years that
can be exercised, and runs through December 31, 2012.
Exhibit "A"—2012 Cost Proposal
The contract includes an increase of $140,000 for snow removal operations. All of the other
contract provisions contained in the original agreement are in place and will remain unchanged
in exercising this op�ion year.
If you are in agreement with exercising the 2012 option year, please sign below to acknowledge
the receipt and concurrence to perform the 2012 option year. Please return two (2) copies to the
City for execution. A fully executed original copy will be mailed to you for your files.
CTTY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Poe Asphalt Paving, Inc.
Name and title Name and title
Date signed Date signed
EXHIBIT"A"
2012 Cost Proposal
2012 2012
Street Maintenance Material Costs
Labor Hourly Overtime 1/2"PG64-28 50 Gyro-liguid cost @ 547.50* $51.27
Superintendent $46.31 $46.31 1/2"PG70-28 75 Gyro-liguid cost @ 547.50* $53.27
Foreman $46.31 $62.33 1/2"PG70-28 100 Gyro-liguid cost @ 547.50* $51.01
Operator $44.46 $58.49 Top Course(5/8) $6.30
Teamster $42.51 $54.20
Laborer $39.15 $50.88
Overhead and Profit Fee Costs
Direct Costs 22%
2012 Subcontractors 8%
Snow Operetions-90%Wages
Labor Hourly Overtime *Price adjustments based on WSDOT 5-04.4.OPT2.GR5
Superintendent $44.68 $44.68
Foreman $44.68 $57.41
Operator $41.77 $53.83
Teamster $39.63 $50.15
Laborer $35.64 $46.29
2012
Equipment Costs
38 KW Tractor $60.72
22 End Dump $60.72
29 End Dump $60.72
40 End Dump $60.72
56 End Dump $60.72
60 End Dump $60.72
23 Super $81.47
24 Super $81.47
25 Super $81.47
27 Super $81.47
28 Super $81.47
257 WaterTruck $45.03
259 WaterTruck $60.72
205 Tack Truck $45.03
273 Service Truck $39.47
230 F250 $16.19
300 F150 $16.19
202 F450 $27.07
208 F450 $27.07
247 F550 $27.07
75 Lowbed $37.44
102 Pup $21.25
103 Pup $21.25
187 Pup $21.25
188 Pup $21.25
197 Belly Dump Trailer $21.25
144 Tilt Trailer $26.57
131 Trailer $15.94
132 Trailer $15.94
149 Trailer $15.94
461 Grade Roller $55.15
406 DD34 Roller $44.78
411 Roller $44.78
418 Roller $65.78
416 Roller $79.95
505 Bomag $86.02
524 Blawknox $177.10
722 John Deere 210 $50.60
718 Huber $55.66
711 Cat 160 $86.53
828 Broce Broom $55.66
926 Tack Trailer $16.19
421 Plate Wacker $5.36
946 Saw $26.57
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: January 10, 2012 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Street Sweeping Contract Renewal
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Street Sweeping Contract Approval on March 3, 2007
and Contract Renewal in 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011.
BACKGROUND:
The City conducted an RFP process in February 2007. In March 2007 the Council awarded the
contract to AAA Sweeping by the following motion:
\E�i'BL:SINESS
3. �Iotion C'ozisideration: Street S«;eepizig Request for Proposals—Jolui Holmiaii
Ei�aii�eer Holui�azi e�plained tl�at tl�is issue «�as pre��iously preseiited to C�olincil �o��eii�l}er 14 aiid
Febzliar� 2�: ai�d that staff no«� seeks appro�al of the contra�t t❑ �AA SG�eepii�a in ai� amaui�t i�ot t❑
e�ceed $4-�.G8�. It iti as i�am�erl U�• C'nir3�cil�iieniUe�•27e�ierrrrti'rr3�rl secorrrTerl to a��rrrrl ilie corr�i°rrct tn��1
.5��eepi�i� irr rrti ar��orrrrt 3�nt to e.rceerT 5'�1?3,6S'rr3�rl arrrliori=e tdre Cin•_lfarrager to si��i tdre cn3�t�•rrcr arrrT
�rtrrre se�•e3�-ti errr re3�e�t•aJ nptiorrs rrs pro��irTerl i�i tlie �2FP rTociniietit.s. �Ta�or LG'ilhite invited publir
�ozzunent: no rozzunents ti�rere offered. Yore I�1 ,4cclar��ation: Iti Fai•ar: �ri�rr3�i�iinirs. C7�poserl: No��e.
.�I�sterrtiorrs:�l'orre. _llntiorr carrierl.
The contract was for one year with seven one-year renewal options which may be exercised by
the City. AAA Sweeping provided a good level of service during 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and
2011. In 2011 the total approved contract amount was $490,199.94. The contract amount will
remain at the same amount for 2012. AAA Sweeping had requested a 2% increase in their unit
prices. The current CPI-U as of October is 3.5%. As a result of the newspaper article on
December 31 st, AAA called the City January 3rd and offered to reduce the increase to 1% as
requested by several councilmembers at the meeting on December 27th. I have adjusted their
rates to reflect the 1% increase.
OPTIONS: Renew the contract, or provide staff with further direction.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve the contract to AAA Sweeping in an
amount not to exceed $490,199.94 and authorize the City Manager to sign the contract.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The contract will be funded by the 2012 approved budget.
STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten
ATTACHMENTS 2012 DRAFT contact renewal letter and contract rates
Spokane
Valle �
y 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhallC�spokanevalley.org
January XX, 2012
AAA Sweeping, LLC
P O Box 624
Veradale, WA 99037
Re: Implementation of 2012 option year,for Agreement for Street Sweeping Services, No. 07-
001, executed March 13, 2007
Dear Mr. Sargent:
The City executed a contract for provision of Street Sweeping services on March 13, 2007. The
Request for Proposal states that it was for one year, with seven optional one-year terms possible
if the parties mutually agree to exercise the options each year.
The City would like to exercise the 2012 option year of the Agreement. The Compensation as
outlined in Exhibit A, 2012 Unit Cost Proposal, shall not exceed $490,199.94. This is the fifth of
seven possible option years that can be exercised, and runs from January 1 through December
31, 2012.
Exhibit "A"—2012 Cost Proposal
All of the other contract provisions contained in the original agreement are in place and will
remain unchanged in exercising this option year.
Please sign below to acknowledge the receipt and concurrence to perform the 2012 option year.
Please return two (2) copies to the City for execution. A fully executed original copy will be
mailed to you for your files.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY AAA Sweeping, LLC
Name and title Name and title
Date signed Date signed
Exhibit A
2012 SWEEPING CONTRACT UNIT RATES
ITEM DESCRIPTION 2012
UNIT COST
1 Mechanical Sweeper $148.74
2 Kick/Angle Brooms $108.93
3 Regenerative Air Sweeper $148.74
4 Water Truck $110.55
5 Dump Truck/ End Truck $110.55
6 Loader $108.93
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: January 10, 2012 Department Director Approval: �
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Traffic School Interlocal Agreement
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N/A, Administrative Report provided on September 23,
2011.
BACKGROUND: The Spokane County Sheriff's Office currently operates a traffic school for
qualifying individuals that have received traffic infractions in the unincorporated County. The
school allows officers to interact with the individuals in a positive environment, providing
education regarding current traffic laws and safe driving techniques; in return the participants
have their infractions dismissed upon satisfactory completion of the class.
Chief VanLeuven has asked that the City participate in the traffic school, citing the positive
impact upon drivers in our community and the enhanced relationship between the police and
citizens.
The attached interlocal agreement is for the year 2012 only. The City and the County will meet
prior to September 1, 2012 to discuss renewing the agreement.
OPTIONS: Authorize Participation or Decline to Participate
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Authorize the City Manager to execute the
Interlocal Agreement between the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, and the Spokane
County Sheriff for Participation in Traffic School.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Operating costs are supported by participant fees and
payment by the City is not required. There would be an estimated loss of infraction revenue of
$97,152, of which the City would retain $53,434.
STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst
ATTACHMENTS: Interlocal Agreement, Memorandum
�e
NO. 4 �" I. l 1�
BEFORE TI-IE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF EXECUTING AN )
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AMONG THE )
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE ) '
COiJNTY, AND THE SPOKANE COUNTY )
SHERIFF FOR THE CITY OF SPOKANE ) R E S O L U T I O N
VALLEY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE TRAFFIC )
SCHOOL ESTABLISHED BY SPOKANE )
COUNTY AND OPERATED BY THE SPOKANE )
COIJNTY SHERIFF )
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 3632.120(6), the Board of County Commissioners of
Spokane County, Washington (`Board") has the care of county property and the management of county fimds and
business;and
WHEREAS,pursuant to RCW 46.83.010 cities and counties may establish traffic schools;and
WHEREAS,chapter 39.34 RCW(Interlocal Cooperation Act),authorizes counties and cities to contract with
each other to perform certain functions which each may legally perform;and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 07-1000, the Board of County Commissioners has established a
traffic school for the unincorporated area of Spokane County which school is operated by the Spokane County
Sheriff. The City of Spokane Valley desires to contract with Spokane County and the Sheriffto obtain traffic school
services for City of Spokane Valley.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County,
Washington, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.32.120(6), RCW 46.83.010 and chapter 39.34 RCW that either
the chairperson of the Board, the Board, or a majority of the Board be and hereby authorized to execute, that
document entitled"INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE
COUNTY,AND THE SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF FOR PARTICIPATION IN TRAFFIC SCHOOL"pursuant
to which under certain terms and conditions the Sheriff will provide certain enumerated traffic school services for the
City of Spokane Valley through December 31,2012.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this y of � O1 l.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMIVIISSIONERS
o� C��ss OF SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
� �E C' r0
O�:'�,� o���''�
� .� �`�• r�
° � � : ° AL FRENCH,
'`� �� 58A1..•' �
ATTEST: ���,
TODD 1VIIIELKE,Vice-Cha'
Daniela Erickson CHARD, issioner
Clerk of the Board
Page 1 of 1
�
SECTION NO. 3: TRAFFIC SCHOOL
�
A. The SHERIFF currently operates a traffic school for the benefit of Spokane County
residents who receive certain tr�c infractions in unincorporated areas of the County.
The CITY would like to participate in SHERIFF'S traffic school pursuant to chapters
39.34 and 46.83 RCW.
B. The purpose of the traffic school is to instruct, educate, and inform all persons appearing
for training in the proper, lawful, and safe o eration of motor vehicles, includin but not
P g
limited to rules of the road and the limitations of ersons, vehicles, and bic cles and
p
Y
I roads, streets, and highways under varying conditions and circumstances. �
C. The SHERIFF shall charge a fee as authorized by law to tr�c school participants. The
amount of the fee sha11 not exceed the base penalty for an unscheduled tr�c infraction
as established and periodically amended by the Washington State Supreme Court
pursuant to RCW 46.63.110, plus any assessments and other costs that are required by
statute or rule to be added to the base penalty. Fees collected in excess of the costs of the
traffic school may be used as authorized by law. The fee is intended to cover all direct �
and indirect costs of the Tr�c School. . .
�
D. The traffic school shall be held at the Spokane County Sheriff s OfFce Training Center
located at 10319 East A lewa Boulevard S okane Valle WA 99206 or at such other
PP , ,
Y P Y �
I' location as the SHERIFF ina h
y eremafter determule. The tranuxig shall be ent�rely
classroom (lecture, discussion and video presentation) and will be approximately six
hours in length or as may be determined by the SHERIFF.
E. It is anticipated that the Costs for operating the traffic school will be entirely funded by
participant fees. For the purpose of this provision, the terminology Costs shall rnean the
annual expenditures plus indirect costs for the tr�c school prepared by the SHERIFF
and agreed to by the COUNTY. All PARTIES understand that if the total arnount of
�� participant fees exceeds the Cost for operating the traffic school in any calendar year that
;� the surplus money in that calendar year can be used by the SHERIFF for any purpose
authorized by law. No costs for the school shall be charged to the CITY.
F. Eligible individuals (as determined by the SHERIFF) receiving traffic infraction citations
within the city limits of the CITY, shall be given the option of participating in the Traffic
School. Satisfactory completion of the class will result in the dismissal of the citation.
Additionally, the Spokane CounTy District Court handling a traffic infraction case within
the limits of the CITY, shall have the legal ability as provided for in RCW 46.83.050, as
part of any sentence imposed following a conviction for any tr�c law violation, or as a
condition on the suspension of sentence or deferral of any imposition of sentence, to
order any person so convicted to attend the tr�c school for a number of days to be
determined by the court, but not to exceed the maximum number of days which the
violator could be required to serve in the city or county jail as a result of his or her
conviction.
Page 2 of 7
SECTION NO. 4: NOTICES
All notices or other communications given hereunder sha11 be deemed given on: (i) the day such
notices or other communications are received when sent by personal delivery; or (ii) the third day
following the da.y on which the same have been mailed by certified mail delivery, receipt requested
and postage prepaid addressed to PAR'TIES at the address set forth below, or at such other ad.dress
as the PARTIES sha11 from time-to-time designate by notice in writing to the other PART'IES:
CITY: City Clerk
City of Spokane Va11ey
11707 East Sprague, Suite 106
Spokane Valley, Washington 99206
Copy: Chief of Police
City of Spokane Valley
12710 East Sprague
Spokane Valley, Washington 99216
COiJNTY: Board of County Commissioners
Spokane County Courthouse
1116 West Broadway Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99260
Copy: Sheriff
Spokane County
1100 West Mallon Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99260
� SECT'ION NO. 5: ASSIGNMENT
This Agreement shall be binding upon the PARTIES, their successors and assigns. No Party may
assign, in whole or in part, its interest in this Agreement without the approval of the other Party.
SECTTON NO. 6: LIABILITY
For purposes of this section,the term COLTNTY sha11 include the Spokane County Sheriff.
The COUNTY shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the CITY, its officers and employees
from all claims, demands, or suits in law or equity arising from the COTJNTY's intentional or
negligent acts or breach of its obligations under the Agreement. The COUNTY's duty to
indemnify sha11 not apply to loss or liability caused by the intentional or negligent acts of the
CITY, its officers and employees.
The CITY shall indemnify, defend and hold haimless the COiJNTY, its ofFicers and employees
from all claims, demands, or suits in law or equity arising from the CITY's intentional or
negligent acts or breach of its obligations under the Agreement. The CITY's duty to indemnify
Page 3 of 7
� shall not apply to loss or liability caused by the intentional or negligent acts of the COUNTY, its
officers and employees.
If the comparative negligence of the PARTIES and their ofFcers and employees is a cause of
such damage or injury, the liability, loss, cost, or expense sha11 be shared between the PARTIE5
in proportion to their relative degree of negligence and the right of indemnity shall apply to such
proportion.
� Where an officer or employee of a Party is acting under the direction and control of the other
Party, the Party directing and controlling the officer or employee in the activity and/or omission
giving rise to liability sha11 accept all liability for the other Parly's officer or employee's
negligence.
Each Party's duty to indemnify shall survive the termination or expiration of the Agreement.
€ Each Party waives, with respect to the other Party only, its immunity under RCW Title 51,
Industrial Insurance. The PARTIES have specifically negotiated this provision.
SECTION
NO. 7: INSU
RANCE
During the term of the Agreement, the COUNTY sha11 maintain in force at its ovcm expense, each
insurance noted below:
a. Worker's Compensation Insurance in compliance with RCW 51.12.020, which
� requires subject employers to provide workers' compensation coverage for a11 their
� subject workers and Employer's Liability or Stop Ga.p Insurance in the amount of not
less than$1,000,000;
b. General Liability Insurance on an occurrence basis, with a combined single limit of
not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. It
shall include contractual liability coverage for the indemnity provided under this
Agreement. It shall provide that the CITY, its officers and employees are additional
insureds but only with respect to the COiJNTY's services to be provided under this
` Agreement; and
�
�
� c. Automobile Liability Insurance with a combined single limit, or the equivalent of
!' not less than $1,000,000 each accident for bodily injury and property damage,
including coverage for owned,hired and non-owned vehicles.
� d. Professional Liability Insurance with a combined single limit of not less than
� $1,000,000 each claim, incident or occurrence. This is to cover damages caused by
the error, omission, or negligent acts related to the professional services to be
provided under this Agreement. The coverage must remain in effect for two years
after the Agreement is completed.
r
z
Page 4 of 7
�
�
I
� There sha11 be no cancellation, material change, reduction of limits or intent not to renew the
insurance coverage(s) without at least 30 da.ys written notice from the COUNTY or its insurer(s)to
the CITY.
�
SECTION NO. 8: ANTI-KICKBACK
�� No officer or employee of the COUNTY, having the power or duty to perform an official act or
action related to this Agreement shall have or acquire any interest in the Agreement, or have
solicited, accepted or granted a present or future gift, favor, service or other thing of value from or
to an erson inv
olved in the A eement.
Y P �'
� SECTION NO. 9: VENUE STIPULATION
� This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and delivered within the
� State of Washington and it is mutually understood and agreed by each party that this Agreement
shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington both as to interpretation and
; performance. Any action at law, suit in equity or judicial proceeding for the enforcement of this
Agreement, or any provision hereto, sha11 be instituted only in courts of competent jurisdiction
within Spokane County,Washington.
SECTION NO. 10: COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
xl
The PART'IES sha11 observe a11 federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, to the
e�rtent that they may be applicable to the terms of this Agreement.
€'�
SECTION NO. 11: NON-DISCRIlVIINATION
= No individual shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefit of, subjected to
discrimination under, or denied employment in the administration of or in connection with this
_ Agreement in violation of federal, staxe or local law.
a SECTION NO. 12: NIISCELLANEOUS
A. NON-WAIVER: No waiver by any Party of any of the terms of this Agreement shall be
construed as a waiver of the same or other rights of that Party in the future.
B. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Agreement contains terms and conditions agreed upon by
� the PAR'TIES. The PAR'TIES agree that there are no other understandings, oral or
: otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement. No changes or additions to this
`. Agreement sha11 be valid or binding upon the PARTIES unless the change or addition is in
� writing, executed by the PART'IES.
C. MODIFICAT'ION: No modification or amendment to this Agreement shall be valid until
put in writing and signed with the same formalities as this Agreement.
Page 5 of 7
D. HEADINGS: The section headin s a earin in this A eement have been inserted solel
g Pp g �' Y
for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. In no way do�they purport to, and shall
not be deemed to define, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they
pertain.
E. COUNTERPARTS: This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts,
each of which, when so executed and delivered, shall be an original, but such
counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same.
' F. SEVERABILITY: If any parts, terms or provisions of this Agreement are held by the
courts to be illegal, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be
afFected and the rights and obligations of the PARTIES shall not be affected in regard to
the remainder of the Agreement. If it should appear that any part, term or provision of
this Agreement is in conflict with any statutory provision of the State of Washington,
then the part, term or provision thereof that may be in conflict shall be deemed
inoperative and null and void insofar as it may be in conflict therewith and this
1 Agreement shall be deemed to modify to conform to the sta.tutory provision.
G. RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES: The PARTIES intend that an independent contractor
relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee, servant or
representa.tive of the COUNTY shall be deemed to be an employee, agent, servant or
representa.tive of the CITY for any purpose. Likewise, no agent, employee, servant or
� representative of the CITY shall be deemed to be an employee, agent, servant or
representa.tive of the COUNTY for any purpose.
SECTION NO. 13: RCW 3934 REQUIRED CLAUSES
A. PURPOSE: See Section No. 1 above.
; B. DURATION: See Section No. 2 above.
C. ORGANIZATION OF SEPARATE ENTITY AND ITS POWERS: No new or separa.te
legal or administrative entity is created to administer the provisions of this Agreement.
D. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES: See provisions above.
E. AGREEMENT TO BE FILED: The CITY shall file this Agreement with its City Clerk and
place it on its web site or other electronically retrievable public source. The COUNTY sha11
file this Agreement with its County Auditor or place it on its web site or other electronically
retrievable public source.
F. FINANCING: Each party shall be responsible for the fmancing of its contractual
; obligations under its normal budgetary process.
G. TERMINATION: See Section No.2 above.
�
Page 6 of 7
H. PROPERTY UPON TERMIl�TAT'ION: Title to all property acquired by any party in the
performance of this Agreement sha11 remain with the acquiring party upon termination of
the Agreement. Jointly acquired property shall be divided in proportion to the percentage
share of each party contributing to its acquisition.
IN WITNESS WI�REOF,the PARTIES have caused this Agreement to be executed on the
date and year opposite their respective signature blocks.
DATED: /� � � / BOARD OF COUNTY COMNIISSIONERS
�� ���s OF SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
s
o���o�ss c���ro��
� N
° �. � � a A1 French, Chair
ATTEST: ��� 5�,.. •'��
c
,
! d' �
� Todd Mielke,Vice-Chair
Daniela Erickson ( l_ l 1"7—j
Clerk of the Board
Mark Ri ard, Co ' ner -
SPOKANE COUNTY SHERIFF
APP AS TO FORM:
Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich � �
De � Civil Pros cu ' orney
DATED: CI OF SPOKANE VALLEY
City Manager
ATTEST: Approved as to form:
City Clerk Office of the City Attorney
Page 7 of 7
S`p�kane
Valley
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhallC�spokanevalley.org
Memorandum
To: Mike Jackson, City Manager
From: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst
Date: June 3, 2011
Re: Traffic School Analysis
Summary
Spokane Valley Police Chief Rick VanLeuven has asked the City to consider participating in the
Spokane County Sheriff's Office Traffic School. When presented to the City at an earlier time,
City administration requested to have revenue impact numbers over an extended period of time.
Enough data now exists to conduct an analysis. The estimated cost to the City is $97,152 in lost
revenue, of which $53,434 is City-retained revenue. The school does not appear to be competing
with private businesses.
While there is not available data to assess the impact on recidivism, survey forms and letters
received indicate that participants have changed their driving habits and their perception of law
enforcement has also changed for the better.
Back�round
The Traffic Safety School began in March 2008 and was offered to qualifying individuals who
had received traffic infraction citations in the unincorporated areas of Spokane County. The
school is entirely supported by fees paid for by participants. Completion of the class allows
participants to have their citations dismissed.
Questions and Answers
What are all the options for traffic infraction offenders (pay ticket, pay reduced fine,
defensive driving, and traffic school)?
• Pay penalty amount in full.
• Mitigate (seek reduction of fine) with District Court Clerk's office—clerks
determine if customer is qualified for a reduction based on driving record and
offense
• Request a Mitigation hearing for reduction of fine
• Request a Contested hearing to deny committing infraction—if found
"committed" penalty to be paid in full; no fine if found "not committed"
• Sign up for Sheriff's Traffic School (currently Sheriffs' tickets only)—if class
completed, charge is dismissed
• Sign up for Alive at 25 program (for offenders age 15-24)—if class is
completed, charge is dismissed
• Deferral program: Customer requests a deferral, meaning that the charges
will be dismissed if he/she is not cited with an infraction for one year.
What are the results of the various options (20% reduction in fine,charge and fine
dismissed, etc.)?
• Mitigation: fine reduced; charge shows on driver's record
• Contested: No fine if found "not committed." Full penalty amount if found
"committed"
• Completion of Sheriff's Traffic School: charge dismissed
• Completion of Alive at 25 program: charge dismissed
• Deferral: charge dismissed if not cited with an infraction for one year; if cited
then the customer is found "committed" on the charge and is fined the original
penalty amount
Who decides what options are accepted by the District Court and what offset (fine
and charge reduction/dismissal) can be applied?
• Mitigation by clerk: a handful of charges can't be mitigated (see below);
otherwise the clerk determines if customer is qualified for a reduction based on
their driving record
• Mitigation hearing: requested by customer
• Contested hearing: requested by customer
• Alive at 25: requested by customer and screened for eligibility (ages 15-24
only)
• Sheriff's Traffic School: requested by customer and screened for eligibility
(Sheriff's tickets only)
• Deferral: See "Additional information on deferrals" below.
Who offers the Alive at 25 program?
• The program is offered by the District Court Probation Department.
Is defensive driving through a private provider not an option and is there a
reason for this?
• An offender could motion the court for such an option, but I cari t say for sure if
that ever happens. Often, however, as part of their request for a deferral, the
Judge may stipulate they enroll in a defensive driving program through a private
provider (i.e. AAA).
Cost Impact
6.8% of people receiving traffic infraction citations in the unincorporated County complete the
Traffic Safety course. Applying this percentage to the Spokane Valley infractions,
approximately 704 infractions would be dismissed in a calendar year. According to the District
Court, the average infraction fine is $150. If the people completing the course would have
otherwise have paid the full fine, the loss in revenue would be $105,600. Many fines are
currently reduced at the window or dismissed by the judge. The average revenue per infraction
in 2010 for Spokane Valley was $138. At this rate, the loss would be $97,152. Of this amount,
approximately 45% of the revenue goes to the state. The total loss of City-retained revenue is
estimated to be 53,434. The costs related to the program are segregated from the Law
Enforcement contract costs and are paid for solely by fees paid by the participants.
According to the District Court and Prosecutor offices for the County, these cases would still
count toward the City's usage as they are still processed by both departments even though the
charges are dismissed. There would, therefore, be no offsetting savings from a reduced usage for
these service contracts.
Pros/Cons
Pros
• Educates/Re-educates drivers regarding current traffic laws
• Improves the relationship between the police and citizens
• Reduces traffic collisions/injuries (data not available).
• Auto insurance cost stability for participants
Cons
• Reduces revenue
• Potentially competes with private business —As the Court do not utilize defensive driving
as a policy option for offenders to use to reduce or dismiss their citations, this is not
competing with a service currently provided by the private business community.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: January 10, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information � admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Spokane County Library District Report: Library Facilities Master Plan
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: none
BACKGROUND: Library Board of Trustees Chair Tim Hattenburg will make a presentation on
the Library Facilities Master Plan.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS:
Spokane Valley City Council
January 10, 2012
�r
S��v� ��u�
L���� I�����
()vPr�
�I �Y'C�Y'
�� �
Facilities
� Master Plan
• Library Facilities Master Plan
— Adopted by Boa rd of Trustees i n 2010
Based on community needs assessment
• Key Findings
Libraries are too small and too noisy
Quiet reading and study areas needed
Not enough books, audiobooks, and
DVDs
— Not enough computers
— Not enough comfortable seating
Guides short and long term facility
planning
Plan prioritizes improvements
()vPr�
• Three phases
— 20-year planning horizon
• Relocate & replace 3 branches
• Add 3 new branches
• Expand & remodel 6 branches
• Expand & remodel support services
— $50.8 million (2010 $) bond funding
— 2014-2015 earliest election date
— All projects completed by 2025-2026
�ri iT�i�Z�iTil, _ � - �F_l l r�T�'1'Ti ��
.
.
.
�: � � _� �_�.:. -r-.�-.�
.. � r. - �„ �_.�
?���r�`�— , _ '�•�;- �, .. �_ !_.;��,,.,.
, � �,,,,,��. -
--•����`^— _ — _ �---.'�_ ��
- - �e � � ` '��
� _ �. �� '� -
— = � �'f �a
' � � � 4 J }.
y�� .
� � _ ��� .
� �
�.-
.� .
�� t �`. �f � k�`�} �;+��' _� - ��•
s � '
f . .
s b
x e � s�r-� �.�'� � ":
�� - � . ��`��r
. - r � �.� ..� �� � _f
I'� 'r — . _ t.-.,,..
�� ,�;°;:��._ � . .�'�'"=�'_--
,�-��;��- ;��
�k .,-;`."w:-�'. , ,l
I - -- � ��. � .
New Branch : Conklin Rd
12,000 sq ua re feet
Single floor
Phase 2
land already owned
— Approximately two acres
East side of Conklin Road,
just South of Sprague
�����,:��]�'
�ri iT�i�Z�iTil, _ � - �F_l l r�T�'1'Ti ��
�
New Branch : South
Va I ley
— 12,000 sq ua re feet
— Single floor
Phase 2
land not yet acquired
— Need Approximately two
acres
— Ideally along the Pines Rd
& 32nd Ave axis
�ri iT�i�Z�iTil, _ � - �F_l l r�T�'1'Ti ��
• Replace Spokane Valley
library
— 50,000 sq ua re feet
— 2 floors
200 seat auditorium
2 conference rooms
— 5 quiet study rooms
— 242 parking spaces
• Phase 1
• Site not yet acquired
— Need approximately four acres
— Ideally on the Sprague Avenue
corridor axis between
University and Pines Roads
. . �
����e�ta�
r}SRIISS•
,.....�� .�.��.� �.� .
���� ,
��1 l��r
��
�ri iT�i�Z�iTil, _ � - �F_l l r�T�'1'Ti ��
• Approximate cost for City of Spokane Valley
projects
— $25,768,000 of the $50,801,000 District-wide total [2010
dollars]
• Timeline
— Assumes successful early 2015 bond issue election
— Phase 1: 2015-2018
• Design, build, open Spokane Valley Library replacement
— Phase 2: 2017-2022
• Design, build, open new Conklin Road Library
• Design, build, open new South Valley Library
rr.•.. • �,��s„
i�` •
,�;�:,n: ��•?��''k
��4•,.�. -�
� =�Rt.t! :'�t.
• Location
— Ideally on the Sprague Avenue corridor
axis between Dartmouth and Pines Roads
— Possibly as far north as Broadway or as far
south as 4tn
— On arterial
— Zoning not an issue for a public library
x �.y;. e�:�r n�,z- ,,�� '�� i �y y�S
q� . : 5^.. ��r.:4i�% . . . ;� � �y,*.r r".F����� �`�r� ! - - ;, *. . : � � - �F`� �• -
k��l'» S
_:}�3'*-'^•1� +•S*,�'�!-��`Y�' „ �1 !r1 �If 4.,., ;h .�: 5 _.
.�. ��V�'.�;;.� -. �r#'`� .�. 1R�:' � '�C
., '�_; '�,.��`11�."�;�:�!',"'�;;�.. s r'�.: .� � ��
� ,i � :�; , � __ � - ...'. �::��
'a���. -- � ��, �: .. _ r��� �, �.:� { �. �:� „�-
' y��;�'��'��*��3�t��+.is�'t� ' ..-.�: _-' � .'.��i �y�,��.�l:. Y�� �xy�,z,rs.;�
�1 �,. rvf:,'�{��;�; 1�� .�� r,� ���ir: .7 }(�•��k��' #{ �,: •��., ... '�.�iy7��.� h-0'•}" _ . rj 'i�
� , �z���•i�}�� �A � r,� i�tl� ,y.. �Ji'-�,���•F ' y �R��i����'�' �i5—�i:�;'+� 1� :�
� "�. s � S
� +�:i �� *��'��;�i:��'����: ' ��1�:.` b!q''.�J�•?�"�il�.�.. .,� �.�, j�}j��1,`�`-".+ �'��f`i�,: :� •«:,���,'f,
4�. ."�,. :Qr ¢�+�' �. � 6'a � .�- �i�` �.�1�i}S: / '" ��.�':, _ F y�
-` �.�1�Y:-� .' ��'.."^ '� '�f�y � 15 `� �, Y ����i`f •..��y�-+y� i i �4 51 .'{' �
{�� ry R3.76➢�1'� M' �
��� '�y •��5.�• �.�� ����fr'!':µ� � }1��_ �'�.�ji �j��� ,yi .���. �� .�� ������r� T
{�►�L• �Ni. � �I. ���y yfw���•.lJh�L�•�i... � .�` "c �i�•.J��l:i� .'�l'�ET'���A����. . }.1• nj
rc rt � . �r a1 7��+�, Y �
��:- �i h� }'•-�-Sy e ['�t ` �F� � r*,7'. F. ��,'1 � �S�
��C �': [ �y �,.;t �
.�-_. ����5.....�}- _` :R._�-3P��.��� :LP.71=�� ,�,—���. !� �'r� ���{,���j a :A
"' .�:._� � ^•�-., — � � � :}�.
a- .+. . 'n:�y ' .:��. ' . . . .- •�.' . , . � -..� _ :-��' '.-�,�',.. ' J �L-
_..e� • ... - :�.'r� r _ .
� ~ '�� !M y � -
:� �f � ��I �A �. ���l� y ��;!- .,-,'�' ..'ti � � __wr�. .� 1. .... . _ ��_��yb.
����, � }�(...���' +� �� ` ��� :.1r�-,. �� :-. - �"�� ----- , �
. • . - ' r ' .' �`� r ,. "
� �i —8y ��I��-�i���:� "�1 e!•., ira'� ';t � '�,._�..-..��"��iz �.
:��,� � r...� r � y,� �. .�+ „n.j,,,. -•+ti.,r•+ ��,,..4 �? ��.fi:[�?-�'� �.:d' �'�fy '�`� �
�'it�: i �� , r% r+'' '�(;�f M ,�,`i� L t� Zi -*p,i.,�� ._.�,� I I ���81��.,Y1 .
3 +f t i� 'ai �'��.' . iw �y �yq � �yr e"'.i `K
� �' 1 '{1�i At � R#R.iF ����L�.wR i�` 9'�T•.w'+�:��J��� '�':r71i��� �..r��y}_��1��.�.��
a. �. pr + � ..��q� ��•s� �,1�+�,r�+�ti s-,��rl.y� ��}'; ;'1'.. ��1t .• �r
..�i`�i��s�-'�!���" �_��'.�i���:3�48Y.Ti.���s.���r y :r-.�' u:�`4 4'�'. 9t4��?".`H":��g`�'
• Site size requirements
— Approximately 4 acres, depending
on parcel configuration
— Significant parking requirements +
landscaping
• Other factors
— Compatible adjacent uses
— Easy left tu rn to pa rki ng
— Prefer vacant land to purchasing
structure and razing
• Site identification and
evaluation
— Representation agreement
with NAI/Black (Grant Person
& M i ke Ki ng) to...
•
Research potential sites
Evaluate suitability
Provide acquisition cost estimates
— Researched 19 potential
locations
• Narrowed down to 4
• Top choice is west half of 8+ acres
at Sprague & Herald owned by
the Pring Corporation
* � S�µN,���=•., r ;��� Yi.: ��
- i��� � -- ;.� _.�!'!� �+1��4`r�y �'�� .
- r� '�r� r '��`-�,,.
4' ' - .�� � ...� y • � ���..J
ti + � � �._R, �,r;
+�• � -�Y� •��' c� '
I��� �R' � 1� i� �I • 1+ � ��_
� �i � �` L` ,��: ,�,�:� �� � � F7� _
1.,''••.i't.-�'td.. �, i'' '�!�r'�t�� ��w._.� .�y��._ .,,._'��i,I�n,�
��Ia � — -�v �TT..'"'T.
,�-���-
F;;� �, °�.;�i- -, , .,. , --- --....:�;;r„T•r+r�'* � r'�
�,� ., ,. - i � � - �. ,. '� �.
.n� t'•r� +� . -� ,� . �,I� ��-
W�_::--�,�„�+;� "i_ , .._ .
ii'� •� �; F'.r, ; .r• .
� • \�Yiy/� �._t •'-�6 �• ,�_
��a�.�. •r� +� ���'' 4� • ' '(��;
,' ,�..._v � �� �� ..�� �:!. . ��.-_ � ��
` ��;,�;,�y,�L •;� �.f ,.�.• ,',i��]
�S'�"` � :. - ��F�li����� .. 'f
.'.p' � �`- �:. ?�11��
. � . ���-. ��
_::�:�, .���
• Pring Corporation property
— Location meets SCLD site
criteria
— Vacant land
— In addition, adjacent to
pa rk (Ba Ifou r)
— H oweve r, o n ly west h a If of
property needed
— Owner is firm about selling
only entire site and for
cash—no financing or
contingencies
— SCLD can't purchase entire
8+ acres
x. �� � � i^ ,�, �� �� _�, ��..��
r�.� ►� ��, � �� �
�� � � �r �':���_-.�___. ....__._..._....�..._ .._'. ^ . ��"�
,�. ,. , .�.� . .�
�,.�� n�� o��
� r��:
� s� � �..
� �� x--• ,5+r�, ._—. _ ,� � � r_ .
� • �. , � i�>` � 4 �i
. . �.• �?u. � -^5�..�, �� r
Kd' . .. . I_ ?N f- . -' � ��:�� � � -:P'1 ��. �
-�� ,r��:_ :�,• � � i
�� �,� �;;
� � � � � �' � ,��,��. `' �;
�, � �. � �� � ������ � �
,. g ��:' ,
, r �'r ��7`��.�'! I
� r �
�� �
� = � � ��` _. ,.
-,i�r.,.�..�. '-. . . 4 . . �.. ' .}'di r a
a�� � ; � � �`� � t� " � �
�� .
.. �
, .
'�� . ,� �f fi�R ..
��° �;� �
� ,. , ,�
, � ��.
, � ��
�.F` �"� .�.-�: '�' �
j a ry '' ° �,
Z � � �, I��, ..
� j �:�' .. ��.
� _
3 � ��,,�
��_ - . _ ,rpi -Jg �uk+�3'A�4',*i�k � ���' [ -_ 1
�. ° � �� -�, � ��y���r�' . - .. �•. �.
. '
�- , ..,u d ��,:, -
��.,,y��y..����, : �.., �. .. . ... ��..Ya'MStl°J�.�rran 3uE+'eF�A�!'�R'F�olHmA':�! ' Y v'��
' �R�y•..•.- .. _..�.+.�.�.or.M;._.. - .. - e �ol. . .. Y,T�i--i:'d .,�'i'�
�. i- i-..�f
.,, . . � ..--T���,� � ^ .
• Proposal
— City of Spokane Valley and Spokane County Library
District discuss joint purchase of entire 8+ acres
• SCLD use west half for library
• City of Spokane Valley use east half to expand Balfour Park
• Joint site planning and development to maximize public use of
the property
• Interlocal Agreement for terms of joint purchase. including
financial
• Probably second Interlocal Agreement regarding joint site
planning and development
— If City Council interested in pursuing, staff could
begin to work out details of purchase offer and
Interlocal Agreements for future Council and SCLD
Board of Trustees consideration
() i � P �tinn �
SP�I�ANE ��UNTY
LIBRARY �ISTRI�T
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: January 10, 2012 Department Director Approval: �
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑public hearing
❑information � admin.report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2012 Senske Park Maintenance Contract
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Approved 2010 and 2011 Park Maintenance
contract with Senske Lawn and Tree Care Inc.
BACKGROUND: In 2009, Park maintenance services were publically bid to award a new
contract for 2010. Senske Lawn and Tree Care was the low bidder on the new 2010 contract and
they completed their second year under the contract in 2011. The contract, approved by the City
Council, was for one year with six one-year renewals based upon satisfactory performance. The
existing agreement allows additional facilities to be added by mutual consent.
The park maintenance contract is based upon maintenance standards and a described
maintenance schedule. The original scope of work requires the contractor to provide all
materials and supplies to complete the work as described. Additionally the contractor is required
to be responsible for all support facilities, customer service and the levels of service that have
been established for developed parks, medians and rights of way and undeveloped lands.
The contract contains a detailed description of routine tasks (mowing, trimming, cleaning
restrooms, cleaning picnic shelters,playground inspections, litter pick up, ball field maintenance,
etc.); periodic/seasonal tasks (fertilizer applications, edging turf, aeration, irrigation
activation/deactivation, snow removal, graffiti, etc.); facilitating special events and working with
the public are required tasks. The maintenance standards established by staff include such
standards as the height of mowed turf, number of fertilizer applications, daily restroom cleaning
to specific specifications, etc.
For 2012, a 1% contract increase has been negotiated for the existing contract. This increase is
to cover the increasing cost of materials such as fuel, fertilizer, weed control and raw materials
such as steel and copper along with such items as worker's compensation and insurance.
Also for 2012, new maintenance responsibilities will be added to the contract in the form of
Greenacres Park and a new picnic shelter at Terrace View Park both coming online. The cost
increase for these two additional responsibilities was negotiated for $68,258.61.
The negotiated increases for the addition of Greenacres Park and the Terrace View shelter are
consistent with what we are currently paying for the same tasks and responsibilities in our
current contract such as the cost of mowing per acre, restroom or shelter cleanup, litter control,
playground inspections, etc.
Therefore staff is recommending the cost for the 2012 Park Maintenance contract with Senske
Lawn and Tree Care to be $680,801.26 which includes the maintenance of Greenacres Park
beginning in June 2012 and the maintenance of the Terrace View Picnic shelter all year long.
2011 $606,477.88 Total cost
2012 $680,801.26 Total proposed cost*
*total increase includes $6,064.77 for 1% increase, $8,304.68 for Terrace View Shelter and
$59,953.93 for Greenacres Park.
OPTIONS: Advance contract to January 17, 2012 for council consideration OR provide
additional direction to staff.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Seek consensus to place the 2012 Senske Park
Maintenance contract on the January 17, 2012 council agenda for approval consideration.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 2012 Park Maintenance contract is funded within the
2012 Park and Recreation Department which was adopted with additional funding for the
addition of Greenacres Park and the Terrace View picnic shelter.
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Stone, Parks and Recreation Director
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Contract Amendment
3rd AMENDMENT TO
PARK MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
Increasing funding for additional services
Senske Lawn and Tree Care, Inc.
7115 E. Cataldo
Spokane Valley, Washington 99212
THIS AMENDMENT No. 3 is made to the Park Maintenance Contract dated December 28, 2009
by and between the City of Spokane Valley, a code City of the State of Washington, hereinafter
"City" and Senske Lawn and Tree Care, Inc., hereinafter "Contractor" and jointly referred to as
"Parties."
Pursuant to Sections 3 and 21 of the Agreement, the Parties hereby agree to amend the
Agreement as set forth in the Bid Package. Changes include: the addition of Greenacres Park
and a new picnic shelter at Terrace View Park to be maintained and serviced. These changes are
subject to all of the conditions set forth in the original Agreement. The City agrees to pay
Contractor a total of$680,801.26 for the 2012 Park Maintenance contract as outlined below.
Original contract amount ..................................................... $560,532.25
Amendment No. 1 .............................................................$ 36,757.77
Amendment No. 2 .............................................................$ 9,187.86
Amendment No. 3............................................................. $ 75,72235
Amended Contract Amount............................... . ............. ... $680,801.26
The remainder of the Agreement will remain unchanged by this Amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have execu�ed this Agreement this day of
January, 2012.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY: SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE
1NC.
Mike Jackson, City Manager poug Warner, Branch Manager
Tax ID No.: 91-0910097
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Office of the City Attorney
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
For Planning Discussion Purposes Only
as of January 5, 2012; 11:45 a.m.
Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative
To: Council & Staff
From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager
Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
Januarv 17,2012, Studv Session Format, 6:00 n.m. [due date Mon,Jan 9]
ACTION ITEMS:
L Motion Consideration: Senske Contract Renewal-Mike Stone (15 minutes)
2. Motion Consideration: Snow Removal Plan -Neil Kersten (10 minutes)
NON-ACTION ITEMS:
3. International Fire Code—Mary Kate McGee/Kevin Miller (15 minutes)
4. ADA Discussion—Mary Kate McGee (15 minutes)
5. Street Preservation—Neil Kersten (20 minutes)
6. Gateway Signs—Mike Stone (20 minutes)
7. Shoreline Update—Lori Barlow (20 minutes)
8 Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
9. Info Only: City's 10-year Anniversary [*estimated meeting: 110 minutes]
CONFIRMED:January 18, 2012: Tour of Spokane T�alley Police Precinct
Januarv 24, 2012, NO MEETING (Councilmembers travel to Olympia for CLAC)
January 25-26: CLAC (City Legislative Action Conference) - Olympia
Januarv 31,2012, Studv Session Format, 6:00 n.m. [due date Mon,Jan 23]
1. Andy Dunau, Spokane River Trail&Improvements (25 minutes)
2. Amendment to 2012 Budget(Sprague Stormwater, Quiet Zones, Gateway Signs)—Mark Calhoun (20 min)
3. Spokane Valley Municipal Code Miscellaneous Ordinance, Housekeeping Items—Cary Driskell(10 min)
4. Revisions to Title 24 Building Code —Doug Powell, John Hohman (20 minutes)
5. Governance Manual Discussion—Chris Bainbridge (30 minutes)
6. Computer/Laptop Agenda Training—Greg Bingaman (30 minutes)
7. Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
8.Info Only: (a) CDBG Update—Scott Kuhta; (b)Dept. Reports [*estimated meeting: 140 minutes]
Februarv 7,2012, Council/Staff Retreat,8:30 a.m.—4:00 n.m. [due date Mon,Jan 30]
Possible topics: Economic Development,� Capital Projects; Citywide Survey; Parks & Rec. Master Plan; Special
Events Permits/Charitable Solicitations
Februarv 7,2012,Studv Session Format, 6:00 n.m. [due date Mon,Jan 30]
1. Spokane Regional Sports Commission (Sports Marketing &Its Impact in the Valley)—Eric Sawyer (20 min)
2. Fire Department Interlocal Agreement(fees)—Cary Driskell (15 minutes)
3. Advance Agenda [*estimated meeting: minutes]
February 14, 2012,Formal Meetin�Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Feb 6]
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Amended 2012 Budget—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes)
2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending 2012 Budget—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes)
4. First Readings Proposed Ordinances Amending SVMC Housekeeping—Cary Driskell (20 minutes)
5. Admin Report: Lodging Tax—Round Two—Mark Calhoun (20 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 65 minutes]
Draft Advance Agenda 1/5/2012 2:38:09 PM Page 1 of 2
Februarv 21,2012, Studv Session Format, 6:00 n.m. [due date Mon,Feb 13]
1. Advance Agenda
Februarv 28, 2012,Formal Meetin�Format, 6:00 n.m. [due date Tues,Feb 21]
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending 2012 Budget—Mark Calhoun (10 minutes)
3. Second Readings Proposed Ordinances Amending SVMC Housekeeping—Cary Driskell (20 minutes)
4. Motion Consideration: Approval of Fire Department Interlocal Agreement(fees)—C. Driskell (10 minutes)
5. Info Only: Dept Reports [*estimated meeting: minutes]
March 6,2012,Studv Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,Feb 27]
1. Advance Agenda
March 13, 2012,Formal Meetin�Format, 6:00 n.m. [due date Mon,March 5]
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Motion: Lodging Tax Allocations—Mark Calhoun (20 minutes)
March 20, 2012, Studv Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due date Mon, March 12]
1. Advance Agenda
March 27,2012,Formal Meetin�Format,6:00 p.m. [due date Mon,March 19]
1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Info Only: Dept Reports [*estimated meeting: minutes]
Anri13,2012, Studv Session Format, 6:00 n.m. [due date Mon,March 26]
1. Advance Agenda
OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS:
Bidding Contracts (SVMC 3.—bidding exceptions)
Centennial Trail Agreement
Contracts, Annual Renewals,histories, etc.
Ending Fund Balance
Governor's Budget Reduction Alts, Review of
Great Northern Railroad Right-of-way
Investment Accounts
Landscaping Code Amendments (KKendall)
Law Enforcement Interlocal Amendment
Manufactured Homes
Mission Ave Design(Mission &Long ped. crossing)
Prosecution Services
Public Input Process for Capital Projects
Revenue Policy, Cost Recovery
Senior Housing
Shoreline Draft Goals and Policies
Sidewalks
Speed Limits, (overall system)
Sprague Appleway Corridor Environ.Assessment
*time for public or council comments not included
Draft Advance Agenda 1/5/2012 2:38:09 PM Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: January 10, 2012 Department Director Approval: �
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
� information ❑ admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: City Hall at the Mall, Wednesday, February 29, 2012
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: n/a
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: n/a
BACKGROUND: As part of our effort to make city government and services more available to
the community and to build relationships between the city and its constituents, we are holding a
"City Hall at the Mall" event on Wednesday, February 29, 2012.
An informational display booth will be set up in the Center Court at Spokane Valley Mall during
regular mall hours from 10:OOam to 9:OOpm. The booth will be staffed by staff inembers who
have a good depth of knowledge within their department/division to answer questions and share
information with citizens who stop by the booth.
Laptop computers will be set up so use of the website to access information can be
demonstrated, citizen action requests can be filed, comments can be taken, and online services
can be provided at the booth, almost as if they were at City Hall itself. Informational brochures
and handouts on a variety of city topics will also be available.
The Spokane Valley Mall is making this opportunity available to us at no charge. They are very
excited to be able to support our efforts to be involved in the community and have offered the
assistance of their event and promotions coordinator to help us promote the event.
Councilmembers who may be interested in signing up for a shift at the booth to help connect
with citizens are welcome. Available hours are 10:OOam-12:45pm; 12:45pm-3:30pm; 3:30pm-
6:15pm; 6:15pm-9:OOpm.
OPTIONS: Information only
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information only
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: n/a
STAFF CONTACT: Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer
ATTACHMENTS:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: January 10, 2011 Department Director Approval: �
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
� information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Spokane Valley Municipal Code Housekeeping
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN AND GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
1. Title 2.50.035: Ordinance 06-092 § 6, 2006.
2. Title 5.10.010 and 5.20.140: Ord. 10-006 § 3, 2010 and Ord. 05-017 § 2, 2005.
3. Title 7.20.180(B): Ord. 09-020 § 29, 2009 and Ord. 56 § 1, 2003 respectively.
4. Title 8.10.030; 8.20.050; 8.35.020; 8.35.080; 8.40.010; and 8.50.010.: Ord. 46 § 31, 2003;
Ord. 46 § 21, 2003; Ord. 46 § 19, 2003; Ord. 46 § 52, 2003; Ord. 46 § 49, 2003; Ord. 46 § 40,
2003.
5. Title 17.100.030, 17.100.040, 17.100.150E, 17.100.250, and 17.100.300: Ord. 07-015 § 4,
2007.
6. Title 19: 19.30.010 and 19.40.120: Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007; and Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007.
7. Title 20.20.090(D); 20.20.110; AND 20.80.010(C): Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007; Ord. 09-002 § 1,
2009; and Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007.
8. Appendix A: Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007.
BACKGROUND: The Office of the City Attorney from time to time reviews the City's Code to
verify references to other Code sections and County Code sections are correct. When Code
amendments are made, sections may be added, changed, or repealed. Therefore it is
necessary to update the City's Code to reflect these changes. All changes proposed are of a
housekeeping nature only and are not substantive.
1. Title 2: There is currently a discrepancy in how the Code references state law which
potentially creates confusion. The Code references a definition of"family member" in the RCWs
while only "family" is defined. For purposes of efficiency and clarity, the Code should be
amended to only include the definition of"family."
2. Title 5.10.010 and 5.20.140: The references to the Revised Code of Washington in SVMC
5.10.010 are amended to accurately reflect the correct law and provide the definition of liquor.
SVMC 5.20.140 is being repealed because other sections of the Code are inconsistent and
reflect no such grace period.
3. Title 7: Section 7.20.180(B) will be amended to the correct reference for alarm registration
fees and enforcement. Section 7.30.010(B) will be amended to reflect the correct County Code
provision for the requirement of dog/cat vaccinations for rabies.
4. Title 8: The references to the Revised Code of Washington in the above noted sections of the
SVMC are amended to accurately reflect the correct law.
5. Title 17: A new subsection is added to SVMC 17.100.030(1) to allow City Staff, based on field
observations, to initiate a compliance action if the responsible party has previously been served
a notice and order or that party had previously entered a voluntary compliance agreement.
SVMC 17.100.040 is amended to clarify that all complaints need not be investigated.
SVMC 17.100.050 is amended to allow a responsible party 30 days (instead of 15) from
notification of a probable violation to enter into a voluntary compliance agreement.
SVMC 17.100.060 is amended to allow notice to be served by ordinary first class mail.
SVMC 17.100.150 is amended for clarity.
SVMC 17.100.250 is amended to make the civil penalties more consistent with what the City
actually fines responsible parties and for added clarity.
SVMC 17.100.300 is amended to remove the requirement of preparing a report of abatement
costs incurred by the City.
6. SVMC Title 19.30.010 and 19.40.120: Section 19.30.010 is amended to reference the correct
RCW pertaining to comprehensive plans. Section 19.40.120 is amended to reflect the correct
title in the U.S.C. pertaining to manufactured homes.
7. SVMC Title 20.20.090(D); 20.20.110; AND 20.80.010(C): Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007; Ord. 09-
002 § 1, 2009; and Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007: Both Sections 20.20.090(D) and 20.80.010(C) are
amended to reflect the correct reference to future acquisition areas. Section 20.20.110 is
amended to reflect the correct references to subdivisions.
8. SVMC Appendix A: The definition section of Appendix A will be amended to update reference
to state law including hazardous wastes, ecological functions or shoreline functions, forest
lands, mineral resource lands, shorelands or shoreland areas, shoreline of statewide
significance, shoreline of the state, and liquor.
OPTIONS: Move forward with ordinance readings for the noted changes.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff recommends moving forward with ordinance
readings for the noted changes.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None.
STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS: Draft ordinances
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 12-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 2.50.035(B) OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE DEFINITION OF A FAMILY MEMBER; AND
OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley previously adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code
Title 2 in order to govern the administration and personnel of the City; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.50.035 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code was adopted in order to
prohibit nepotism in the City; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.50.035(B) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code defines "family
member"for purposes of the anti-nepotism policy of the City; and
WHEREAS, the definition of"family member" was to be the same as the definition in RCW
42.52.010; and
WHEREAS, RCW 42.52.010 does not define "family member," but rather defines "family" and
makes reference to RCW 42.17.020(26) for the definition of"immediate family;"and
WHEREAS, Section 2.50.035(B) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code should be amended to
make direct reference to RCW 42.17.020(26) for purposes of efficiency and clarity.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington ordains as
follows:
Section 1. Amendin� S�okane Vallev Munici�al Code Section 2.50.035(B) re�ardin� the reference
to the familv member definition in RCW 42.52.010. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 2.50.035(B)
is hereby amended as follows:
2.50.035 Nepotism.
A.Nepotism Prohibited. The City prohibits employment of family members where one
family member has the authority to supervise or audit the work of another family
member.
B. The definition of"family member" for purposes of this section shall be the same as
� thatin RCW 4217.026(26�4`'.��o, as adopted or amended.
Section 2. Remainder of SVMC Title 2 Unchan�. The remaining provisions of SVMC Title 2 are
unchanged by this amendment.
Section 3. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this Ordinance.
Ordinance 12-_Title 2 amendment Page 1 of 2
DRAFT
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after the
date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City.
Passed this day of , 2012.
Mayor, Thomas E. Towey
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved As To Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance 12-_Title 2 amendment Page 2 of 2
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 12-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 5.10.010 AND REPEALING SECTION 5.20.140
OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE DEFINTION OF
LIQUOR AND THE GRACE PERIOD ALLOWED FOR A PAWNBROKER IN
VIOLATION OF TITLE 5 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE; AND
OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley previously adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code
Title 5 in order to govern business licenses and regulations in the City; and
WHEREAS, Section 5.10.010 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code defines liquor to mean all
beverages defined in RCW 66.04200; and
WHEREAS, RCW 66.04200 does not e�st, but RCW 64.04.010 contains definitions for Title
66, alcoholic beverage control, and includes a definition for liquor; and
WHEREAS, Section 5.10.010 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code should be amended in
order to reference the correct citation for the definition of liquor in state law; and
WHEREAS, Section 520140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code provides a grace period for
a pawnbroker who is in violation of the regulation chapter of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, Section 520.140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code should be repealed as the
grace period is no longer relevant.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington ordains as
follows:
Section 1. Amendin� Spokane Vallev Municipal Code Section 5.10.010 re�ardin� the definition of
liquor in RCW 66.04200. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 510.010 is hereby amended as
follows:
I "Liquor"means all beverages defined in RCW 64.04.010�-94-�9A.
Section 2. Repealin� Spokane Vallev Municipal Code Section 520.140 re�ardin� the �race period
for a �awn broker in violation of Title 5 of the S�okane Vallev Munici�al Code. Spokane Valley
Municipal Code section 520.140 is hereby repealed:
c �n i nn r,...,.,... ,.a
�
�
> >
�e�Qe�e��ee�s-o-��E�ie�z��oa ,�.,�c�����?9.���
Ordinance 12-_Amending Title 5 Page 1 of 2
DRAFT
Section 3. Remainder of SVMC Title 5 Unchan�ed. The remaining provisions of SVMC Title 5 are
unchanged by this amendment.
Section 4. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this Ordinance.
Section 5_ Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after the
date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City.
Passed this day of , 2012.
Mayor, Thomas E. Towey
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved As To Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance 12-_Amending Title 5 Page 2 of 2
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 12-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTIONS 7.20.180(B) AND 7.30.010(B) OF THE
SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF
ALARM SYSTEMS AND ANIMALS; AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley previously adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code
Title 7 in order to regulate the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City; and
WHEREAS, Section 720.180(B) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code governs issuance of
citations and assessment of service fees in connection with alarms and it references SVMC 720.170; and
WHEREAS, SVMC 720.170 has been repealed, but SVMC 720310 deals with fees for alarm
registration and false alarm enforcement and is likely the correct reference intended in Section
720.180(B) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, Section 720.180(B) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code should be amended to
reference SVMC 720310 instead of referencing repealed SVMC 720170; and
WHEREAS, Section 730.010(B) adopted Section 5.04.031 of the Spokane County Code,
entitled `Cat—License—Required,' as now in effect and subsequently amended; and
WHEREAS, Spokane County Code has since amended Section 5.04.031 to be entitled "Dog/Cat
to have current vaccination against rabies;" and
WHEREAS, Spokane County Code Section 5.04.030 is now the appropriate reference for
Section 730.010(B) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code and it should be amended for clarity
purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington ordains as
follows:
Section 1. Amendin� Spokane Vallev Municipal Code Section 720.180(B) re�ardin� the reference
to SVMC 720.170. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 720.180(B)is hereby amended as follows:
7.20.180 Authorization to issue citations and assess service fees.
A. The alarm administrator is granted a special commission by the chief of police to issue
citations pursuant to this chapter.
B. The alarm administrator is authorized by the city council to assess costs pursuant to
� SVMC 7.20.310''.`',-�-��
Section 2. Amendin� Spokane Vallev Municipal Code Section 730.010(B) re�ardin� the reference
to S�okane County Code Section 5.04.031. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 730.010(B) is
hereby amended as follows:
Ordinance 12- Amending Title 7 Page 1 of 2
DRAFT
7.30.010 Animal control regulations.
A.Pursuant to RCW 35A.11.020 and 35A.12.140, the City of Spokane Valley adopts by
reference Chapter 5.04, entitled "Dogs and Cats," and Chapter 5.12, entitled "Inherently
Dangerous Mammals/Reptiles," of the Spokane County Code as now in effect and as
subsequently amended as the animal control regulations for the City of Spokane Valley,
except as specifically set forth in SVMC 730.035 relating to appeals of decisions of
whether a dog is dangerous, and except as specifically set forth in SVMC 730.040
relating to appeals of decisions of whether a dog is potentially dangerous, and except as
specifically set forth in SVMC 730.045 relating to registration of dangerous dogs, and
repealing the City's adoption of Spokane County Code Sections 5.04.032, 5.04.033 and
5.04.035; any reference to "Spokane County" in Chapters 5.04 and 512 of the Spokane
County Code shall be construed to refer to the City of Spokane Valley.
B.Pursuant to RCW 35A.11.020 and 35A.12.140, the City of Spokane Valley adopts by
� reference Section 5.04.030�.��� of the Spokane County Code, entitled "Cat License—
Required," as now in effect and subsequently amended. Any reference to "Spokane
County" shall be construed to refer to Spokane Valley.
Section 3. Remainder of SVMC Title 7 Unchan�ed. The remaining provisions of SVMC Title 7 are
unchanged by this amendment.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after the
date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City.
Passed this day of ,2012.
Mayor, Thomas E. Towey
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved As To Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance 12- Amending Title 7 Page 2 of 2
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 12-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTIONS 8.10.030; 8.20.050; 8.35.020; 8.35.080; 8.40.010;
AND 8.50.010 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
PROVISIONS WITHIN TITLE 8 THAT CONTAIN INACCURATE CROSS
REFERENCES TO STATE LAW; AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley previously adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code
Title 8 as the Criminal Code for the City; and
WHEREAS, some of the provisions within Title 8 contain inaccurate cross references and
citations due to amendments and repeals; and
WHEREAS, the inaccurate cross references and citations contained within Title 8 should be
amended in order to reflect the proper cross references and citations in order to promote internal
consistency within the Spokane Valley Municipal Code and external consistency with State law.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington ordains as
follows:
Section 1. Amendin� S�okane Vallev Munici�al Code Section 8.10.030 re�ardin� the reference to
RCW 9.86.050, as the remainin� references contained therein now contain the �enalt,��rovisions.
Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 810.030 is hereby amended as follows:
8.10.030 Flags.
�
The following provisions of the Revised Code of Washington as presently constituted or
hereinafter amended are adopted by reference:
RCW:
9.86.010 "Flag" defined.
9.86.020 Improper use of flag prohibited.
9.86.030 Desecration of flag.
9.86.040 Application of provisions.
I
Section 2. Amendin� Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 820.050 re�ardin� the reference to
RCW 69.50204(c)(14). Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 820.050 is hereby amended as follows:
8.20.050 Controlled substances.
The following provisions of the Revised Code of Washington as presently constituted or
hereinafter amended are adopted by reference:
RCW:
69.50.101 Definitions.
Ordinance 12-_Amending Title 8 Page 1 of 4
DRAFT
� 69.50204(c) 22 �4} Schedule I—Marijuana.
69.50.309 Containers.
69.50.401(e) Prohibited acts: A—Penalties.
69.50.425 Misdemeanor violators—Minimum imprisonment.
69.50.505(a)(1), (3), (6) and(7) Seizure and forfeiture.
69.50.506 Burden of proof.
69.50.509 Search and seizure of controlled substances.
Section 3. Amendin� S�okane Vallev Munici�al Code Section 835.020 re�ardin� the reference to
� RCW 9.18.140, as the remainin� references contained therein now contain the penalt�provisions.
Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 835.020 is hereby amended as follows:
8.35.020 Competitive bidding.
The following provisions of the Revised Code of Washington as presently constituted or
hereinafter amended are adopted by reference:
RCW:
9.18.120 Suppression of competitive bidding.
9.18.130 Collusion to prevent competitive bidding.
� o i Q i�n no�.,i,�,
Section 4. Amendin� Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 835.080 re�ardin� the reference to
� RCW 9.16.090, as the remainin� references contained therein now contain the penalt�provisions.
Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 835.080 is hereby amended as follows:
8.35.080 Trademarks and other marks.
The following provisions of the Revised Code of Washington as presently constituted or
hereinafter amended are adopted by reference:
RCW:
9.16.030 Counterfeit mark,intellectual property.
916.050 When deemed affixed.
9.16.060 Fraudulent registration of trademark.
9.16.070 Form and similitude defined.
9.16.080 Sales of petroleum products improperly labeled or graded.
I n.��.n�ie�P�e�6i�r�v�iciS-��€��isro€�ez'ar"v"rgi ticr€f��€��
9.16.100 Use of words "sterling silver," etc.
916.110 Use of words "coin silver," etc.
9.16.120 Use of word "sterling" on mounting.
9.16.130 Use of the words "coin silver" on mounting.
9.16.140 Unlawfully marking article made of gold.
9.16.150 "Marked, stamped or branded," defined.
Ordinance 12-_Amending Title 8 Page 2 of 4
DRAFT
Section 5. Amendin� Spokane Vallev Municipal Code Section 8.40.010 re�ardin� the adoption of
RCW 9.68A140 and RCW 9.68A.160 which have been repealed. Spokane Valley Municipal Code
Section 8.40.010 is hereby amended as follows:
8.40.010 Sexual offenses relative to minors.
The following provisions of the Revised Code of Washington as presently constituted or
hereinafter amended are adopted by reference:
RCW:
9.68A.011 Definition.
9.68A.080 Processors of depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct—
Report required.
9.68A.090 Communication with a minor for immoral purposes.
c� �4�-�o i�i-����iixi�i 6a�
9.68A.150 Allowin� minor on�remises of live erotic�erformance—Definitions—
Penaltv .
n ti4�-�o�=ro��€�^��
9.69.100 Duty of witness of offense against child or any violent offense—Penalty.
2628.080 Selling or giving tobacco to minors—Belief of representative capacity,no
defense—Penalty.
Section 6. Amendin� Spokane Vallev Municipal Code Section 8.50.010 re�ardin� the adoption of
RCW9.91.110 which has been re�ealed. Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 8.50.010 is hereby
amended as follows:
8.50.010 Miscellaneous crimes.
The following provisions of the Revised Code of Washington as presently constituted or
hereinafter amended are adopted by reference.
RCW:
9.91.010 Denial of civil rights—Terms defined.
9.91.025 Unlawful bus conduct.
9.91.060 Leaving children unattended in parked automobile.
I 19290.070°.°�o Metal buyers—Records of purchases—Penalty.
9.91.130 Disposal of trash in charity donation receptacle.
9.02.050 Concealing birth.
Section 7. Remainder of SVMC Title 8 Unchan�. The remaining provisions of SVMC Title 8 are
unchanged by this amendment.
Section 8. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this Ordinance.
Ordinance 12-_Amending Title 8 Page 3 of 4
DRAFT
Section 9. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after the
date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City.
Passed this day of , 2012.
Mayor, Thomas E. Towey
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved As To Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance 12-_Amending Title 8 Page 4 of 4
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 12-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTIONS 17.100.030, 17.100.040, 17.100.150E, 17.100.250, AND
17.100.300 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE CITY'S
ABILITY TO SET FORTH ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE
NUISANCE CODE SET FORTH IN THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER
7.05 AND VIOLATIONS OF ANY PROVISIONS OF THE UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT CODE;
AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley previously adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code
Chapter 17.100 in order to enforce nuisance violations as set forth in Spokane Valley Municipal Code
Chapter 7.05 and for violations of any provisions of the Uniform Development Code; and
WHEREAS, since adoption of these provisions, the City has gained experience in how to better
regulate and enforce such nuisance provisions; and
WHEREAS, certain e�sting provisions within Spokane Valley Municipal Code Chapter 17.100
should be amended in order to better reflect the City's current practice of regulating and enforcing such
nuisances. Such changes directly relate to the life,health, and safety of the City's citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington ordains as
follows:
Section 1. Amendin� Spokane Vallev Municipal Code 17.100.030 Re�ardin� Enforcement,
Authorit�, and Administration. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 17.100.030 is hereby amended
as follows:
B.If it is determined that violations of this title ha�e occurred or are occurrin� and the�artv(sl
responsible has previously been served with a notice and order pursuant to SVMC 17.100.130, or has
previouslv entered into a volunta ,r��liance a�reement�ursuant to SVMC 17.100.100, then the Citv
shall ha�e the authoritv to initiate a new com�liance action based on field observations by Cl , staff
pursuant to SVMC 17.100.030(A).
C�. The procedures set forth in this chapter are not exclusive. These procedures shall not in any manner
limit or restrict the City from remedying or abating violations of this title in any other manner authorized
by law.
� D�. In addition to, or as an alternative to,utilizing the procedures set forth in this chapter, the City may
seek legal or equitable relief to abate any conditions or enjoin any acts or practices which constitute a
code violation.
� E�. In addition to, or as an alternative to,utilizing the procedures set forth in this chapter, the City may
assess or recover civil penalties accruing under this chapter by legal action filed in Spokane County
district court or superior court by the office of the city attorney.
� F€. The provisions of this chapter shall in no way adversely affect the rights of the owner, lessee, or
occupant of any property to recover all costs and expenses incurred and required by this chapter from any
person causing such violation.
� G€. In administering the provisions for code compliance, the City shall have the authority to waive any
one or more such provisions so as to avoid substantial injustice. Any determination of substantial injustice
shall be made in writing supported by appropriate facts. For purposes of this subsection, substantial
injustice cannot be based exclusively on financial hardship.
Ordinance Amending Title 17 Page 1 of 3
DRAFT
� HL�. The City may,upon presentation of proper credentials,with the consent of the owner or occupier of a
building or premises, or pursuant to a lawfully issued court order, enter at reasonable times any building
or premises subject to the consent or court order to perform the duties imposed by this code.It is the
intent of the city council that any entry made to private property for the purpose of inspection for code
violations be accomplished in strict conformity with constitutional and statutory constraints on entry, and
the holdings of the relevant court cases regarding entry. The right of entry authorized by this chapter shall
not supersede those legal constraints.
� I�. The City may request that the police, appropriate fire district, Spokane Regional Health District, or
other appropriate City department or other non-city agency assist in enforcement. (
Section 2. Amendin� Spokane Vallev Municipal Code 17.100.040 Re�ardin� the Guidelines for
De�artmental Res�onses to Com�laints. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 17.100.040 is hereby
amended as follows:
City representatives are authorized to determine,based upon past complaints regarding a property,
� subsequent field investigations, and other relevant criteria,whether a complaint is reliable. A si�ned
complaint is necessary,but not necessarily suff'icient, to commence a field investi�ation. If the City
determines a complaint is not reliable, the City is not obligated to conduct a field investigation.
Section 3. Amendin� Spokane Vallev Municipal Code 17.100.050 Re�ardin� the Procedures when
Probable Violation is Identified. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 17.100.050 is hereby amended
as follows:
� F. If the violation is not corrected, or a voluntary compliance agreement is not entered into within 30�
days of notification by the City, a notice and order or stop work order should be issued. Stop work orders
should be issued promptly upon discovery of a violation in progress.
Section 4. Amendin� S�okane Vallev Munici�al Code 17.100.060 Re�ardin� the Service of a
Notice and Order and a Sto� Work Order. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 17.100.060 is hereby
amended as follows:
A. Service of a notice and order shall be made on a person responsible for code violation by one or more
of the following methods:
3. Service by mail may be made for a notice and order by mailing one copv�postage prepaid,
e�by ordinary first class mail_��� *'�° �*'�°�-'�� �°�-*��'°� m��', to the person responsible for the code
violation at his or her last known address, at the address of the violation, or at the address of the place of
business of the person responsible for the code violation. The taxpayer's address as shown on the tax
records of Spokane County shall be deemed to be the proper address for the purpose of mailing such
notice to the landowner of the property where the violation occurred. Service by mail shall be presumed
effective upon the third business day following the day upon which the notice and order was placed in the
mail.
Section 5. Amendin� S�okane Vallev Munici�al Code 17.100.150 Re�ardin� the Contents of a
Notice and Order. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 17.100.150 is hereby amended as follows:
� E. A statement that a civil penalty is being assessed,including the dollar amount of the civil penalties�
��-�*°����'�*���, and that any assessed penalties must be paid within 20 days of service of the notice and
order.
Ordinance Amending Title 17 Page 2 of 3
DRAFT
Section 6. Amendin� Spokane Valley Municipal Code 17.100250 Re�ardin� the Assessment
Schedule for Civil Penalties. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 17.100250 is hereby amended as
follows:
A. Civil penalties for code violations shall be imposed for remedial purposes and shall be assessed for
each violation identified in a notice and order or stop work order,pursuant to the following schedule:
Notice and orders and stop work orders—basic initial penalty��: $500.00.
B. Additional��penalties shall�be added where there is:
z.�c�o.,������t�e�e���e�=e���9 �,�9�
� �.,i a.,,,, a z �.,• n
z. €ir`viirvixrir€i�---- -=----_��viiir�€j3€i�a�--��ir3�'a€�lr� ,��
�.�-cnirag��6�ivP€�` "��i-viir€�'—cnirvi�ir�€j3€i�'�a-o--�7ir3€'az€�iT��v ����
14. Second violation ' � : $�999500.�99:-9�
2. Each subsequent Violation (three or more): $�59�1,000.
����e��r �s� '��t�en�-(�e�-e�e��. �,`�
�3b. Economic benefit to person responsible for violation: $5,000.
Section 7. Amendin� Spokane Vallev Municipal Code 17.100300 Re�ardin� Cost Recover�
Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 17.100250 is hereby amended as follows:
A. In addition to the other remedies available under this chapter,upon issuance of a notice and order or
stop work order the City shall charge the costs of pursuing code compliance and abatement incurred to
correct a code violation to the person responsible for a code violation. These charges include:
3. Abatement Costs. The City shall keep an itemized account of costs incurred by the City in the
abatement of a violation under this chapter. ,
, , ; and
Section 8. Remainder of SVMC 17100 Unchan�. The remaining provisions of SVMC Chapter
17.100 are unchanged by this amendment.
Section 9. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this Ordinance.
Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after the
date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City.
Passed this day of , 2012.
Mayor, Thomas E. Towey
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved As To Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance Amending Title 17 Page 3 of 3
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 12-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTIONS 19.30.010 AND 19.40.120 OF THE SPOKANE
VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PROVISIONS WITHIN TITLE 19 THAT
CONTAIN INACCURATE CROSS REFERENCES TO STATE AND FEDERAL LAW;
AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley previously adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code
Title 19 to regulate zoning in the City; and
WHEREAS, Section 1930.010 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code references RCW
36.70.130(2)(a)which does not e�st and
WHEREAS,the correct citation should be RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a); and
WHEREAS, Section 1930.010 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code should be amended in
order to correct the citation; and
WHEREAS, Section 19.40.120 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code regarding manufactured
homes cites 42 U.S.C. 7 §§ 5401-5403 which relates to social security when it should actually reference
42 U.S.C. 70 §§ 5401-5403 which relates to manufactured home construction and safety standards; and
WHEREAS, Section 19.40.120 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code should be amended in
order to correct the citation; and
WHEREAS, Section 19.40.120 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code also cites RCW 3521
(miscellaneous provisions) when the more accurate citation for this Section is RCW 3521.684 (authority
to regulate placement or use of homes — regulation of manufactured homes — issuance of permits —
restrictions on location of manufactured/mobile homes and entry or removal of recreational vehicles used
as primary residences); and
WHEREAS, Section 19.40.120 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code should be amended in
order to correct the citation.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington ordains as
follows:
Section 1. Amendin� S�okane Vallev Munici�al Code Section 1930.010 re�ardin� the reference to
RCW 36.70.130(2)(a). Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 1930.010 is hereby amended as follows:
19.30.010 Comprehensive Plan text and map amendments.
� Pursuant to RCW 36.70A130(2�(al . . , proposed updates to the
Comprehensive Plan will be processed only once a year except for the adoption
of original subarea plans, amendments to the shoreline master program, the
amendment of the capital facilities chapter concurrent with the adoption of the
City budget, in the event of an emergency or to resolve an appeal of the
Comprehensive Plan filed with the Growth Management Hearings Board.
Comprehensive Plan text and map amendments are classified as Type IV
development applications and shall be processed pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140.
Ordinance 12- Title 19 Amendment Page 1 of 2
DRAFT
Section 2. Amendin� S�okane Vallev Munici�al Code Section 19.40.120 re�ardin� the references to
42 U.S.C. 7 § 54010-5403 and RCW 3521. Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 19.40.120 is hereby
amended as follows:
19.40.120 Manufactured housing.
� A.Pursuant to the requirements of RCW 3521.684r'�wr+��r�� '" �r«' the City does
not discriminate against consumers' choices in the placement or use of a home that is not
equally applicable to all homes. This section applies only to manufactured housing units
placed on individual lots.
� B. Homes built to 42 U.S.C. 70 Sections 5401 through 5403 standards (as they may be
amended) are regulated for the purposes of siting in the same manner as site-built homes,
factory-built homes, or homes built to any other state construction or local design
standard; provided,however, that the manufactured home shall:
1. Be a new manufactured home; and
2. Be set upon a permanent foundation, as specified by the manufacturer,
and that the space from the bottom of the home to the ground be enclosed
by concrete or an approved product which can be either load-bearing or
decorative; and
3. Comply with all local design standards,including the requirement for
a pitched roof with a slope of not less than 3:12, applicable to all other
homes within the neighborhood in which the manufactured home is to be
located; and
4. Be thermally equivalent to the state energy code; and
5. Otherwise meet all other requirements for a designated manufactured
home as defined in RCW 35.63160.
Section 3. Remainder of SVMC Title 19 Unchan�ed. The remaining provisions of SVMC Title 19
are unchanged by this amendment.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after the
date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City.
Passed this day of , 2012.
ATTEST: Mayor, Thomas E. Towey
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved As To Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance 12- Title 19 Amendment Page 2 of 2
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 12-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTIONS 20.20.090(D); 20.20.110; AND 20.80.010(C) OF
THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PROVISIONS WITHIN
TITLE 20 THAT CONTAIN INACCURATE CROSS REFERENCES; AND OTHER
MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley previously adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code
Title 20 to regulate subdivisions in the City; and
WHEREAS, both Sections 2020.090(D) and 20.80.010(C) of the Spokane Valley Municipal
Code reference SVMC 22.130.035 (future acquisition areas)which does not e�st and
WHEREAS, SVMC 22.130.080 (future acquisition areas) is the appropriate reference for both
Sections 2020.090(D) and 20.80.010(C) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code and each should be
amended in order to correct the citation; and
WHEREAS, Section 2020.110 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code references SVMC
Chapters 22.30 through 22.40 which are reserved for performance standards and incentives, and
evacuation and emergency response standards respectively; and
WHEREAS, SVMC Chapter 2030 relates to preliminary short subdivisions, subdivisions, and
binding site plans and is the appropriate reference; and
WHEREAS, SVMC Chapter 20.40 relates to final short subdivisions, subdivisions, and binding
site plans and is also the appropriate reference; and
WHEREAS, Section 2020.110 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code should be amended in
order to correct the citations.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington ordains as
follows:
Section 1. Amendin� Spokane Vallev Municipal Code Section 2020.090(D)re�ardin�the reference
to SVMC 22.130.035. Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 2020.090(D) is hereby amended as
follows:
20.20.090 General design.
D. When a tract is subdivided into lots of one acre or more in size,the community
development director(hereafter referred to as the "director")may require an arrangement
of the lots and streets,in conformance with the adopted arterial and local access street
� master plan or areas identified in SVMC 22130.080`'`'.'�-.��, Future acquisition areas,
such as to permit a subsequent redivision.
Ordinance 12-_Amending Title 20 Page 1 of 2
DRAFT
Section 2. Amendin� Spokane Vallev Municipal Code Section 2020.110 re�ardin� the references to
SVMC Cha�ters 2230 and 22.40. Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 2020.110 is hereby amended
as follows:
20.20.110 Attached single-family subdivisions.
Applications for an attached single-family subdivision consisting of nine or fewer lots
shall be submitted and processed according to the requirements for content and form for
� preliminary and final short subdivisions and process as stated in Chapters 2030?�.�
through 20.40�-49 SVMC. Application for an attached single-family subdivision
consisting or 10 or more lots shall be submitted and processed according to the
requirements for content and form for preliminary and final subdivisions as stated in
Chapters 2030 through 20.40 SVMC. Application for alterations of any preliminary short
subdivision or subdivision shall be submitted and processed according to the
requirements of Chapter 20.50 SVMC. Applications for alterations of any final short
subdivision or subdivision shall be submitted and processed according to the
requirements of Chapter 20.60 SVMC. Applications for vacation of any plat shall be
submitted and reviewed according to the requirements of Chapter 20.70 SVMC.
Section 3. Amendin� S�okane Vallev Munici�al Code Section 20.80.010(C) re�ardin� the reference
to SVMC 22.130.035. Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 20.80.010(C) is hereby amended as
follows:
20.80.010 Scope.
C. Such alteration shall not result in a building setback violation or site coverage to less
than prescribed by the zoning regulations or areas as required in SVMC
� 22.130.080`'`'.'��, Future acquisition areas; and
Section 4. Remainder of SVMC Title 20 Unchan�ed. The remaining provisions of SVMC Title 20
are unchanged by this amendment.
Section 5. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this Ordinance.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after the
date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City.
Passed this day of , 2012.
ATTEST: Mayor, Thomas E. Towey
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved As To Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance 12-_Amending Title 20 Page 2 of 2
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 12-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING APPENDIX A OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO DEFINITIONS THAT CONTAIN INACCURATE CROSS
REFERENCES WITHIN THEM;AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley previously adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code
Appendix A in order to define terms used throughout the Spokane Valley Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, some of the definitions within Appendix A contain inaccurate cross references and
citations due to scrivener's errors, amendments, or repeals; and
WHEREAS, the inaccurate cross references and citations contained within Appendix A should
be amended in order to reflect the proper cross references and citations in order to promote internal
consistently within the Spokane Valley Municipal Code and external consistency with State law.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington ordains as
follows:
Section 1. Amendin� Spokane Valley Municipal Code A�endix A Definition for "hazardous
waste." Spokane Valley Municipal Code section Appendix A is hereby amended as follows:
Hazardous waste: All dangerous or hazardous waste materials,including substances
composed of, or contaminated by,radioactive and hazardous components as defined in
� RCW 70.105.010 ll .(�}
Section 2. Amendin� Spokane Vallev Municipal Code A�endix A Definition for "ecolo�ical
functions or shoreline functions." Spokane Valley Municipal Code section Appendix A is hereby
amended as follows:
Ecological functions or shoreline functions: The work performed or role played by the
physical, chemical, and biological processes that contribute to the maintenance of the
aquatic and terrestrial environments that constitute the shoreline's natural ecosystem. See
� wac 1�3-26-zoo(�)�f�.
Section 3. Amendin� Spokane Vallev Municipal Code A�endix A Definition for "forest land."
Spokane Valley Municipal Code section Appendix A is hereby amended as follows:
Forest land: Land identified as of long term significance for growing trees for
� commercial purposes (WAC 365-190-030��}).
Section 4. Amendin��okane Vallev Munici�al Code A�endix A Definition for"mineral resource
lands." Spokane Valley Municipal Code section Appendix A is hereby amended as follows:
Mineral resource lands: Lands primarily devoted to the extraction of minerals with
� potential for long-term commercial significance (WAC 365-190-030 13 �4}).
Section 5. Amendin� Spokane Valley Municipal Code A�endix A Definition for "shorelands or
shoreland areas." Spokane Valley Municipal Code section Appendix A is hereby amended as follows:
Ordinance 12-_Amending Appendix A Page 1 of 3
DRAFT
Shorelands or shoreland areas: Those lands extending landward for 200 feet in all
directions as measured on a horizontal plane from the ordinary high water mark;
floodways and contiguous floodplain areas landward 200 feet from such floodways; and
all wetlands and river deltas associated with the streams, lakes- (RCW
98.58.030(2)��})_
Section 6. Amendin��okane Vallev Munici�al Code A�endix A Definition for "shoreline of
statewide si�nificance." Spokane Valley Municipal Code section Appendix A is hereby amended as
follows:
Shoreline of statewide significance: A natural river or segment thereof east of the crest
of the Cascade range downstream of a point where the mean annual flow is measured at
200 cubic feet per second or more and lakes or impoundments of 1,000 or more acres
� (RCw 9s.ss.o3o�2����.
Section 7. Amendin� Spokane Valley Municipal Code A�endix A Definition for "shoreline of the
state." Spokane Valley Municipal Code section Appendix A is hereby amended as follows:
Shoreline of the state: All of the water areas of the state,including reservoirs, and their associated
shorelands, together with the lands underlying them; except:
1. Shorelines of statewide significance;
2. Shorelines on segments of streams upstream of a point where the mean annual flow is 20 cubic
feet per second or less and the wetlands associated with such upstream segments; and
3. Shorelines on lakes less than 20 acres in size and wetlands associated with such small lakes.
� (RCW 98.58.030(2)��}). Shorelines of statewide significance are shorelines of the state.
Section 8. Amendin�S�okane Vallev Munici�al Code A�endix A Definition for "liquor."
Spokane Valley Municipal Code section Appendix A is hereby amended as follows:
� Liquor: All beverages defined in RCW 66.04.010(25)�-94-�99.
Section 9. Remainder of A�endix A Unchan�. The remaining provisions of SVMC Appendix A
are unchanged by this amendment.
Section 10. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this Ordinance.
Section 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after the
date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City.
Passed this day of , 2012.
Mayor, Thomas E. Towey
Ordinance 12-_Amending Appendix A Page 2 of 3
DRAFT
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved As To Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance 12-_Amending Appendix A Page 3 of 3