Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2012, 02-07 Special Meeting - Council Retreat
AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING RETREAT/WORKSHOP Tuesday, February 7,2012 8:30 a.m.—4:00 p.m. CenterPlace Regional Event Center CIassroom #213 2426 N Discovery Place, Spokane Valley, Washington Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting WELCOME: Mayor Towey Overview—Mike Jackson Tab A- Council Goals Tab C—Legislative Agenda-—Phone Conference w/Briahna Tab B- Work Place Final 2012 Business Plan, enclosed 1) Economic Development—John Hohman Relocation of the Permit Center 2) Street Preservation—Neil Kersten Funding Options—Mark Calhoun 3) Citywide Survey—Morgan Koudelka 4) Miscellaneous Items—Mike Jackson a.Email process—citizen comments b. Open Public Meetings c. Animal Shelter d 1O 'Anniversary e. Railroad Quiet Zone material LUNCH BREAK 12:00—12:30 (Note: Council&Staff moves to ce separate room for lunch, Reconvene in Room 213) 5) Planning Commission—John Holtman 6) Old Milwaukee—Mike Jackson,Neil Kersten 7) Parks—Mike Stone a. Master Plan b. Sponsorship—discussion c. Gateway—discussion 8) Park Land Acquisition—Mike Jackson/Mike Stone 9) Special Events Permits/Charitable Solicitations—Cary Driskell 10) Capital Projects—Mark Calhoun 11) Ending Fund Balance—Mike Jackson/Mark Calhoun 12) Council Brainstorming—open discussion Adjourn Note: There will be no public comments at Council Study Sessions or Workshops. During meetings held by the City of Spokane Valley Council, the Council reserves the right to take "action" on any item listed or subsequently added to the agenda. The term "action" means to deliberate, discuss, review, consider, evaluate, or make a collective positive or negative decision. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments,please contact the City Clerk at(509)92I-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Retreat Agenda 02-07-12 Page I of 1 2012 Budget Goals The 2012 budget reflects the distribution of resources consistent with the Council's determina- tion of core service priorities. The following goals represent just the very broad areas of con- centration important to the well being of the community. • Continue monitoring wastewater issues, including governance of wastewater facilities, and pursuit of the most efficient and economical methods to ensure the continuation of wastewater discharge licenses. • Pursue the topic of Solid Waste, to include identifying the issues and obtaining alterna- tives of joining the consortium or handling it ourselves and the consequences of each alternative. • Review and evaluate development regulations and compare with surrounding cities. • Develop a Shoreline Master Program to appropriate regulatory protection for waters of statewide significance as required by state statute. • Pursue a legislative capital budget request for 1) funding for Sullivan Bridge replacement and 2) funding for the acquisition of park land adjacent to the Park Road Pool. • Create an economic development plan including options for a new city hall. 1 nig /9 SC1TY o1 t f © e _ „,.., , in ® - - \ a, ,,,,y ll ,_ ,_ :, \\) f ., , i 14 1 - ti_ \ 1 it ti 6o+ asp t .y4 y r, Y 'ti . 1 1,61,-; :14...„,,,y; , 1 Annual Work Plan for 2012 2012 Budget Goals Including Tasks & Timeline and Department Objectives Executive &Legislative Support Operations &Administrative Services Community Development Public Works Parks &Recreation f Public Safety/Police 2012 Budget Goals The 2012 budget reflects the distribution of resources consistent with the Council's determina- tion of core service priorities. The following goals represent just the very broad areas of con- centration important to the well being of the community. • Continue monitoring wastewater issues, including governance of wastewater facilities, and pursuit of the most efficient and economical methods to ensure the continuation of wastewater discharge licenses. • Pursue the topic of Solid Waste, to include identifying the issues and obtaining alterna- tives of joining the consortium or handling it ourselves and the consequences of each alternative. • Review and evaluate development regulations and compare with surrounding cities. • Develop a Shoreline Master Program to appropriate regulatory protection for waters of statewide significance as required by state statute. • Pursue a legislative capital budget request for 1) funding for Sullivan Bridge replacement and 2) funding for the acquisition of park land adjacent to the Park Road Pool. • Create an economic development plan including options for a new city hall. 2012 Budget Goals Work Plan Public Works o Tasks and Timeline: Continue monitoring wastewater issues, including govern- ance of wastewater facilities, and pursuit of the most efficient and economical methods to ensure the continuation of waste- water discharges licenses. t / -- continue monitoring Q1 2012 7 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 wastewater issrtes Jan Feb Mar ,'Apr May Jun j Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 Analysis and review with the County, City of Spo- kane,and Dept.of Ecology regarding wastewater _______ Treatment Facility options. Public Works - Tasks and Timeline: 0 Pursue the topic of Solid Waste to include identifying the is- sues and obtaining alternatives of joining the consortium or handling it ourselves and the consequences of each alternative. v, — — — --.J Pursue the topic of solid waste Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec IPursue the topic of solid waste—include identifying the issues&obtaining alternatives of joining the con- sortium or handling it ourselves&the consequences • • of each alternative. Community Development Tasks and Timeline: 0 p Review and evaluate development regulations and compare with surrounding cities. Review and evaluate development regulations and ; Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 compare with surrounding cities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 Review and evaluate development regulations and compare with surrounding cities. ► Community Development —Tasks and Timeline: ti Develop a Shoreline Master Program to provide appropriate regulatory protection for waters of statewide significance as required by state statute. Develop rr Shoreline Master Program Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 Develop a Shoreline Master Program to provide ap- propriate regulatory protection for waters of statewide it significance as required by state statute. Executive and Legislative Support —Tasks and Timeline: 0 Pursue a legislative capital budget requests for: ! Pursue a legislative capital budget requests for: Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep =Oct Nov Dec 1 fiurding for Sullivan Bridge replacement 2 funding for the acquisition of parkland adjacent to the Park Road Pool. 4 + Community Development —Tasks and Timeline: Create an economic development plan including options for a new city hall. 1 Create an economic development plan including op- I Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 dons for a new ei ■hall !Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun i Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 Create an economic development plan including op- tions for a new city hall. 4 1 Department Objectives Operations & Administrative Services Q1 2012 I Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 i i Deputy City Manager Division Jan Feb Mar 'Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ' Propose service contract amendments to ease admini- 1 station and allow control of costs 4-- - ---4> 2 Define and formalize contracting guidelines • ♦ 3 Collaborate with partners to identify and pursue op- • portunities to reduce incarceration costs 4 Complete animal shelter options analysis 4 Facilitate improvements based on the 2011 Citizen 5 Survey • Identify projects # ♦ • Implement improvements 4 I 6 Identify and provide media training for authorized spokespersons 7 Implement a comprehensive Public Information Plan '4, Involve all departments in use ofE-gov service re- 8 quest system 4 • 9j' Monitor City-wide performance measures in Business Plan • Promote Spokane Valley's unique ID—especially for 10 2013 4 • Develop plans for the City's 10-year anniversary in 2013 40 2 Define City identity by proposing "key messages" that can be repeated&used in promotion of the City 12 Develop reports on Spokane Valley demographics& economics based on 2010 census data 4 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 i Q4 2012 y Malian Resources Division Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 'Jul Aug Sep 1 Oct Nov Dec III i AL 1 Maintain Wellness Program for the City r --jat ♦ —11 Enhance employee recognition program ♦ _♦ 3 Consult with Departments to improve website content 4 Bargain successor Collective Bargaining Agreement to be implemented 1/1/2013 4 5 - Review City Employment Policies for needed updates • Ql 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Human Resources Division, Cont. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 7 Provide support for the City's ADA Self Evaluation • wog and Plan WNW • 8 Evaluate the City's Unemployment and Labor and Industries programs to reduce labor costs 9 Implement City-wide safety related training as identi- 4 fed in the Accident Prevention Program 10 Implement an on-line employment application process 4 • for the City Q12012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Finance Division Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep c Oct Nov Dec 1 Implement additional State Auditor suggestions 4 ' Improve financial statement process and accuracy 4 3 Complete the installation of the Paladin SmartGov permit tracking software and work with the Commu- nity Development Department to monitor actual re- ~ -- - sults against City expectations. 4 Work with the City Manager and Community Devel- opment Department to move the Permit Center into the main City Hall building including the location of • the Finance Department Assist in negotiations for a • revised building lease that will be a consequence of the department relocations. 5 Evaluate the existing City purchasing system and con- sider implementing a revision to procurement includ- ing the use of purchase requisitions and purchase or- 4 ders. 6 Develop a system to audit sales tax receipts and ensure that sales taxes collected by businesses located in Spo- kane Valley are actually credited to the City as op- 4 — 4- posed to other municipalities. 7 Replace 30 personal computers that will reach the end of their life cycle. 8 Replace 3 servers that will reach the end of their life cycle. 4 9 Roll out Microsoft Office 2010. • Q1 2012 1 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 - Community Development Jan Feb Mar 3 Apr May Jun ;Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Implement the Roadinap for Enhanced Permitting ♦ ._ r., MOM a • Staffmg Changes to Improve Organizational Struc- ture h • Organize forms and procedures 4 ► c • Improve Communication with the Development Community d • Planning Division Prioritization 4 ► e • Expand Express Permitting 4 f • Implement Counter Review 4 • g • Review and Revise Development Code—compare • ♦ with surrounding cities h • Implement Permit Tracking System 4 • i • Implement Performance Measures 4 ► j • Continue Staff Coaching and Training ♦ • k • Relocate Permit Center Economic Development a • Continue meetings with Regional Partners • b • Continue work on Development Code and other 4 • Road Map items c * Add Economic Development to the City's Busi- ness Plan rl • Update City webpage,provide information,bro- ► chures f • Process 2012 Comp Plan Amendment to revise Econ Dev.Chapter g • Explore options for a new City Hall 4 • Migrate Permitting System to SmartGov 4 ► 4; Develop a Shoreline Master Program to appropriate regulatory protection for waters of statewide significance as ♦ ► required by state statute. Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments •- ' Complete Forker Draw floodplain restudy • f a • Develop Hydrology data ♦ ► b • Develop Hydraulic data • • c • Perform floodplain mapping 4 • - • d • Develop preliminary map products 4 • 1 —` Q12012 _ Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Community y Development Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 7 Review Development codes for regulations concern- ing infill development. • -- • 8 Update Engineering Standards $ 9 Complete an ADA Inventory and Plan 4 10 I TJOA boundaries through regional process $ 11 Implementation of Bike and Pedestrian.Master Plan $ • 12 Initiate State required major update of the Compre- # + hensive Plan 13 Emergency Management 4 • 14 Prepare an annexation process and forms for the City of Spokane Valley • --– • 15 Develop GIS content,standards and workflows 4 • 16 Explore opportunities for regional partnering with Spokane County and the City of Spokane. .---- - • 17 Wellhead Protection Committee 4 • 1 4 Q1 2012 i Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 I Public Works-- 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun :Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Administration i 1 Continue monitoring wastewater issues, including governance of wastewater facilities, and pursuit of the 4 + most efficient and economical methods to ensure the continuation of wastewater discharges licenses. 2 Pursue the topic of Solid Waste to include identifying the issues and obtaining alternatives of joining the consortium ♦ • or handling it ourselves and the consequences of each alter- native, 11 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Public Works— Stormwater Jar Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 Develop six-year Stonmwater Capital Improvement Plan 4 --. 2 Continue to implement the Ecology Phase II Stormwater permit 3 Renew or bid contracts with private contractors for Landscape Vactoring Sweeping Stormwater maintenance services 4 • 4 Complete Stormwater assessment rolls—update commercial impervious surfaces map for 1/5 off com- mercial parcels 5 Continue Underground Injection Control(UIC)as- sessment and testing program(must be completed by • 2013) 6 Design and construct a vactor liquid decant facility ON HOLD Pending Grant Application 14 Provide input to Ecology's Stormwater permit renewal for the City 2012 Public Works — Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Owital Improvement Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Update six-year Transportation Improvement Plan for arterial roadways • • ■Identify&reconunend new projects — — Public hearing on draft plan 44 ■Seek Council approval of plan Submit STP,TIB &other grant requests as available • • Implemnent approved Capital Projects 4 • Valley Corridor—Environmental assessment 4 • Broadway Ave Safety Project—Park to Pines— * ► (design&construction) Various street preservation projects---(design&con- . • struction) Indiana/Sullivan PCCP Intersection—(design&con- struction) Argonne Rd Corridor Improvements—(design&con- _ ► struction) Pines Rd Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITS) • (design&construction) Sprague Ave ITS—(design&construction) Sprague/Sullivan ITS Phase II PE/RW/CN ► Mission Avenue reconstruction—Flora to Barker • (designlRW) 4--Sullivan/Euclid PCC(design) 4 ► N. Greenacres Trail(design) ON HOLD • Valley—Millwood Trail(planning&design) 4 ► ■Sullivan Road Bridge—(design) • • Sidewalk Infill Project—(design&construction) ► •Mansfield Ave.Connection—(design/RW) 24th Ave.Sidewalk--Adams to Sullivan(design) ` Sullivan Rd.Bridge drain retrofit(design&construc- tion) 2011 Step Projects: Green Haven—Phase I&II Broadway/Argonne/Mullan PCC(PE) ■ Sprague Ave.Reconstruction#2—Evergreen to 4 • Sullivan Public Works -- I Ql 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Capital Improvement Cont. ;Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun ,Jul Aug Sep "Oct Nov Dec t. Sullivan Road Bridge temporary repair Sidewalk&transit stop 4 • University /1-90 overpass Study t $ Evergreen Road Rehab— 16th-32nd 40 ■ 4 1 Public Works — Street Fund Q l 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Operations & Maintenance :Jan Feb Mar f Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 Optimize traffic signals on selected corridors and implement timing plans LED traffic signal upgrades supported by funds from the EECBG • + •- Update the 2011 Street Master Plan 4 Renew or bid new contracts with private contractors ' for street maintenance MIDevelop and implement a Bridge Maintenance • Program wiii Work with various schools to install flashing beacons at crosswalks r WA Bid and construct bridge maintenance projects on City • ` Bridges and overpasses *- Fir. Update the County's street sign database and develop a plan for compliance with new standards 8 •, Research and install LED speed limit displays on mis- sion for Valley Mission Park Parks & Recreation — Administration & Maintenance Division U p d a t e Park&Recreation M a s t e r Plan 1 Q 1 2012 I Q2 2012 I Q3 2012 Q4 2012 1 1 Jan Feb Mar I Apr May Jun i Jul Aug Sep :Oct Nov Dec 1 Advertise for consultants 2 Series of public input sessions&data gathering 3 Complete Master Plan update Renovate turf&irrigation at south Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Mirabeaa Point Park I Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 Complete construction Construct new playground equipment at Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 1 Terrace View Park ; r Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec _ 1 Public design process 4 ■ __.., ..— 2 Develop plans to specification 4—• 3 Award construction contract 4- 4 Complete construction ■ i- - Begin development of a dog park Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Jan Feb Mar ;Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 Continue to explore potential dog park sites 2 Develop relationship with citizens group after Master Plan update 3 Develop funding and maintenance plans • - • Develop and finalize Centennial Trail i Q 1 2012 Q2 2012 1 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 maintenance agreement I Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec A Create new draft agreement and work with other juris- dictions to approve 4 Parks & Recreation — Recreation/ Aquatics Division Maintain healthy parhaerships with Liberty Lake, Q12012 Q2 2012 1 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Spokane County and the City of Spokane Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1 Jul Aug Sep:'Oct Nov Dec 1 As noted above I ' Build partnerships in the Community through the Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Healthy Communities Network Jan Feb Mar 1 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 Program and facilitate Spring break youth theater camp 2 Share educational information Solicit sponsorships for the summer outdoor movies Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 1 Q4 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1 Jul Aug Sep!Oct Nov Dec 1 Develop sponsorship program 2 Solicit movie sponsors • Continue to collect information or expand program Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 marketing to social media sites Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 Research social networking 2 Develop and determine program 3 Market and launch program if approved ill 4-4,--- !vfainlain full summer swimming program Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Jan Feb Mar 1 Apr May Jun I Jul Aug Sep!Oct Nov Dec 1 Work with 2012 Budget to ensure swinuning program remains intact Parks & Recreation — Senior Center Division Offer annual resource and referral fair to provide Q1 2012 { Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 information to the senior population Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 'Oct Nov Dec 1 Develop materials for Fair 4„ - 2 Conduct resource and referral Fair �--i Continue to provide annual training options for Q1 2012 i Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 front desk volunteers Jan Feb Mar !Apr May Jun I Jul Aug Sep 1 Oct Nov Dec 1 Develop front desk resource manual 2 Provide monthly volunteer training opportunities a_ Conthnue to offer day bus trips in conjunction with Q 1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 i Q4 2012 area senior centers Jan Feb Mar ;Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 Explore regional day bus trip options 2 Work with area Senior Centers on trips 4 4 Advertise and offer activities and trips through other Q1 2012 Q2 2012 1 Q3 2012 j Q4 2012 senior centers Jan Feb Mar _Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 Continue to promote activities through various Senior Centers in Spokane are via newsletters,direct mail, • M etc. Continue to work with the Board of Directors Qt 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 regarding their frainhtg and educational opportunities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 Continue to modify and update a board member train- ing program as needed 2 Provide training opportunities at each monthly board 4 meeting CenterPlace Division Create an updated marketing plan for the next Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 1 Q4 2012 five years I Jan Feb Mar `Apr May Jun ;Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 Advertise for consultants .— 2 Consultant research/development of draft update 3 Complete marketing plan&updates Develop a list of meeting planners to promote Q1 2012 Q2 2012 r Q3 2012 Q4 2012 CenterPlace through target marketing 1 Jan Feb Mar 'Apr May Jun ;Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 Research and develop meeting planners list _1 4 i...--- 41. I Continue to increase regional&bnsittess events Q1 2012 • Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1,Jul Aug Sep i Oct Nov Dec ......._H__________. 1 Maintain a presence at trade&tourism shows 2 Implement concepts from updated marketing plan �� r 3 Continue to partner with local tourism outlets for in- 4 • creased exposure ' Develop new lower cost lunch/dinner tnenns with t t Red Rock Research&develop new menus 111 Promote new menus to customers I Public Safety/ Police Build Upon Our Mllultr jurisdictional Q1 2012 E Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 II/or/dug Partnerships Jan Feb Mar '?Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep`Oct Nov Dec 1 Continue to enhance departmental,regional and com- munity public safety efforts in cooperation with citi- zens and businesses,with assistance of Crime Check 2 Increase interest in community involvement in pro- grams such as SCOPE,Neighborhood Watch, Crime s • Prevention,Reserves,Explorers,etc. 3 Continue involvement in Inland Northwest Law En- forcement Leadership Group,sharing intelligence with 4 • state,federal_and other public safety agencies. Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Continue to Work Toward Disaster Preparedness Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 Continue progression of the implementation of our communications interoperability plan including train- ing and equipment installation. 2 Continue involvement in public safety table top exercises with other agencies, including Spokane Val- 4 0 ley departments. Q12012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Staff Goals Jan Feb Mar 1 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep]�Oct Nov Dec Identify and implement specific training needs for • Spokane Valley Police Department 2 Patrol lieutenants now assigned by precinct to provide more effective leadership and supervision,while more • • closely addressing specific needs of the precinct. 3 Continue to develop the false alarm progratn with Public Safety Corporation/Cry Wolf in an effort to further reduce false alarms within the City of Spokane Valley. 4 Continue to implement crime prevention efforts to • keep Spokane Valley a"safe city"to live and work. 4 The Spokane County Sheriff's Office twill be a positive influence in Spokane Valley by continuing to improve, promote,preserve and deliver quality services that result in a feeling of safety and security. The Spokane County Sheriff's Office will accomplish this mission by working in partnership with the Spo- kane Valley community to enhance our lmv enforce- ment effectiveness. 5 Continue to participate on the Problem-Solving Task Force addressing a wide variety of issues the depart- • ment faces, Public Safety/ Police Staff Goads,continued Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 6 Maintain the principles of Intelligence Led Policing through the use of Spokane Crone Analysis Team to 0 identify crime trends and high collision areas to better utilize resources. 7 Enhance the public's perception of law enforcement through community education on recognized police best practices regarding accredited police services. 8 Be more proactive in tracking stolen property either with crime prevention techniques or databases. -- • SpÔkanc alleyt 2011-13 Leggy ,tive Agenda The following is the City of Spokane Valley's 2011-2013 legislative agenda, adopted by Council October 26,2010; amended November 16,2010;December 28,2010; October 25, 2011; and January 17, 2012: Principle Items of Interest: Budget Requests: 1. Support Funding for Sullivan Bridge Replacement. Constructed in 1951, the Sullivan Bridge carries approximately 26,000 vehicles daily with a very high truck volume of about 24%. The Sullivan Road West Bridge is a part of a principal north/south transportation corridor in our City. Serving the southbound traffic as one of two bridges crossing the Spokane River at that location, the bridge links a primary industrial area with the City's major retail and commercial areas to the south, and provides critical access to I-90, the region's only Interstate highway. A 2010 inspection determined the bridge's Sufficiency Rating to be 24.14 out of a potential score of 100, and a subsequent load rating analysis rated the bridge as Shnicturally Deficient. A Notice of Funding Availability for TIGER Discretionary Grants (TIGER III) was published August 12, 2011. The City of Spokane Valley applied for but was not awarded any of these funds. The current estimated cost of the project is$19.7 million. Spokane Valley received$8 million in Federal BR(Bridge Replacement) funds, and another $2 million in state grant funds from FMSIB (Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board), leaving a need of$9.7 million to complete the project. 2. Seek Funding to Acquire Park Land Adjacent to Park Road Pool and Centennial Middle School. The City of Spokane Valley has a population of 89,440 people, but only 172 acres of public parks— drastically below the 6.25-10.5 acres/1,000 population(559-938 acres) specified in the City Parks Master Plan. In the past, Spokane Valley has successfully partnered with the State Legislature to acquire and develop Greenacres Park, adjacent to Central Valley School District's firhue elementary school. A similar opportunity presents itself with Park Road Pool. The City requests $300,000 in funding to acquire land adjacent to Park Road Pool for a park near Centennial Middle School. Policy Requests: I. Protect the state shared revenues the City receives. The City of Spokane Valley encourages the state to preserve Local state-shared revenues. During the 2011 Legislative Session, these funds were cut 3.4%. Moving forward, the City requests that the funds remain intact. These funds include the Liquor Excise Tax Account, Liquor Revolving Account, Streamlined Sales Tax Mitigation, Municipal Criminal Justice Assistance Account,and City-County Assistance Account. 2. Additional Lien Authority to Recoup Code Enforcement Costs. The City of Spokane Valley seeks legislation to provide cities with additional tools to recoup costs for enforcing code compliance when a court order is issued and a city performs the abatement itself or through a contractor. This is anticipated to include enacting lien authority similar to a tax lien, including the authority to execute such a lien in the following year. Page 1 of 2 3. State Environmental Policy Act—Amend Certain Requirements Imposed by State Law. The City supports amending SEPA requirements to make the process less duplicative. SEPA thresholds to consider: (1)Convert some discretionary SEPA exemptions to categorically exempt; (2)Raise the level of SEPA exemptions across the board; (3) Make most actions within UGAs categorically exempt with discretion given to cities; (4) Eliminate excessive costs associated with providing notice for every Determination of Non-significance and Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance application. 4. Support the Association of Washington Cities'legislative agenda items that serve the best interests of the City of Spokane Valley. I Page 2 of 2 Economic Development Update Siidiatealley •os. Economic Development Update Overview > Revising Economic Development Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan Status on Roadmap for Enhanced Permitting > Other Current Economic Development Activities Recent Construction Activity ➢ Recent Pre-Application Meeting Activity ➢ Next Steps SiOkEne \ e3/7- Economic Development Comprehensive Plan Revisions to the Eccno3 = ic Development -chapter of the C © , ri;a live Plan •Updated demographic information •Removed references to sub-area plan 4>Will seek input from the Planning Commission and C t 9 Council on additional revisions to the chapter arrn Spo e_ MCCDErTsrn- ET:L:L Roadmap for Enhance° Permitting Status on Roadmap 1. Meeting with Staff to Identify Expectations Completed 2 Staffing Changes to improve Organizational Structure First phase complete; evaluating additional changes to facilitate Steps band ? 3. Organize Forms and Procedures Planning Division forms and website changes complete o Planning procedure/process review 50% complete • Initiated Building Division process/forms/website revisions • Development Engineering process/forms complete • Development Engineering website changes 75% complete „.•••VValley Economic DeveIoprnert Roadmap for Enhanced Permitting Status on Roadmap 4. Improve Communication with the Development Community o Development Forum held in October 2011 o Informal meeting anticipated in March 2012 o Will be an ongoing effort 5. Planning Division Prioritization • Public counter staff assigned • Senior planner roles defined o Implemented review of all work products 6. Expand Express Permitting ° Sign permit procedures completed Sffoliane Valle♦ r 5 Economic Development Roadmap for Enhanced Permitting Status on Roadmap 7. Implement Counter Plan Review o Testing process on a case by case basis o lvaluatng long term organizational and process changes needed to 5mFement this step 8e Review a nd Revise Development Code o Completed BLA amendment o Obtained Planning Commission Recommendation on Landscaping code changes • Sign Code changes at Planning Commission o Ongoing effort to ensure code meetings the communities needs ����of aley- Economic DeveIopme Roadmap for Enhanced Permitting Status on Roadmap 9. Relocation of Permit Center Staff • Completed floor plan layout o Obtained cost information from property manager — approx. $200,00 for modifications to Suite 106 o Additional costs for cubicle movinglrevisions and file storage , relocation of Finance Department o Working with architectural consultant to refine layout and costs 0. Implement Permit Tracking System O Testing initial version of program O Staff training to be held in February 2012 • Go live date February 2012 erry nF 6 ' - Economic Deveiopm [ Roadrnap for Enhanced Permftt ng Status on Roadmap IL Implement Performance Measures o Completed project survey form as part of software update o investigated procedures from other jurisdictions o Will be discussed with Development Community C2 Continue Staff Coaching and Training • SmartGov permitting software training Working with staff one-on-one as needed c Seeing improvements with staff moral and motivation • Ongoing process SbO iie Valley- 3 Economic Development Other Current Economic Development Strategies SEPA Reform °Q*On the 2012 Legislative Agenda • Department Staff is currently working with City's Lobbyist to provide input at the State level °`<>Recently testified in support of SEPA revisions Siokane 1 YyM 9 Economic Development Other Current Economic Development Strategies City Staff has scheduled meetings with Regional Partne °°Greater incorpora. ed 'Q'Create[r S,pokaneVa ]ey Chambers of Commerce ''Spokane Regional Convention and Visitors Bureau •Spokane Regiona Site Selector °>°international Trade Alliance •Spokane Regional Sports Commission P+PSpokaneValleyArts Council •SpokaneValley Small Business Association •Innovate Spokane, formerly SIRTI , a. ey Economic Development Recent Construction Activity <,`>›.° \ aimart Panda Express at Sprague r � and Carnahan Spokane Teachers Credit Union — 32nd Ave Branch + Cotton Dental 4:• Kidsmile Dental • Subway at Wal mart �°� American Recycling • Enterprise Rent-a-car ., The Reserve at Shelley Lake • SVFD Administration Bldg • Focus Fitness • Pinecroft Bldg W o • Five Guys Burgers Davis Tool Verizon Lone Wolf Harley Davidson can or Spokane Valley Lone Wolf Harley Davidson 2 20 N Wilbur Rd Enter r se Rent-a=Ca: 7202 E Sprague Ave SVFD Adis ]n]str tjon kidding 2 20 N W Lr R R.D The Reserve At Shelley Lake 2fl 5 S Conklin d VVa mart 5025 E Sprague Ave Panda 5W 6 E S pra2-,ue Ave 14 Spokane . eachers Credt :n° on J32H rE 32nd Avs- 22C 13 roadway Ave 15 Vercjzon IV 5 1J 06 E LndianaAve. Amerkan. j'istn-butors 5530 7 Eudncri Ave 16 Economic me Develo re p Recent Pre-Application Meetings and Pro'ect Review Activity owe CarMax •216 unit: multi-family complex along Indiana Extension • i 92 unit multi-family complex along 4th Avenue • SpokaneValley Fire Station #6, 6306 E Sprague • MacKay Manufacturing; 22,000 sf addition + Maverick Station, 4,600 sf C-Store Broadway a Evergreen ©°•Wagstaff, 4 3,000 sf mfg expansion Spok I� VaI1ey Economic Development Next Steps Short Term •Continue Meetings with Regional Partners +Continue work on Code Amendments and other Road Map items +Refine Economic Development in the City's Business Plan +Continue to update City web pages, provkde information, brochures �o k t;lT1"6� aile Economic Development ex. Steps Long Term +Process 20 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to revise Economic Development Chapter •Complete an Economic Development measures for the C f, Sliokane Valley -1-) 8TAIR =11. 111=1 ENTRY pm I so P. wir ,., _F4' 2' c :.....), 1, --) LA C13 El I 4' Ithi A CRrENACRES c'111) n Ibis coNFIRENCE '"47:. I—C-- I J C 12.1 X u , Building,Planning and DE 0 • . .,1. Files 2. n 4' ' x i itOTTE% V '--7 :! ' , J4. 4" Cowise4 ct:untef - 1 I rim ... Roilting ,': 't ii m F Sa C E c ttan _ -.. .. 1 L.— I i n cl F, ___ — i I 1 L"'-''' 1 175.-np. A _ pgq bid 3' D 0 . rem h , LAVS --71) 1 i -r e 'in 1 5' i 1 • F g — —1 u e 1 ir■ 1 , r n i 3 , J CORRODR ( ....1.,, , 1.1 1 0 0 0 : Eli ,, VII 1 \-■ PUTC,V1 .. ,.. 0 ri".--. r _ u 1 ' 1 '''i' 0 ihil N 0 D 4• _ ----N1 lip El ' r: 77- us:3 "' -- _ of. coNFEI)RtANucc • M , _ — N 3 . 3 4' 1.#1 Lmr.■•=el -....) !, ./....:47 Il CI 1 1 r if'OEP.0 • •• rt.,,, c;;IFEREN - SlUdiG A al 'c A f , C = L.i I IL A I ( 4' ENTRY 1 ; il\\I i .z., 5 C 1 4R I ' ; FLOOR PLAN Revised 1-31-12 ■.■ —, mi Strent Mazbr Pion .000%Bey Pavement Management • Program UPDATE 2011 (JOB J•U.B ENGINEERS, INC. SfjOkane--/ .000Vallw J u i rroZ" o u Pavement Management Program 2008 Pavement Management Plan Annual Preservation Project Need Estimated Annual Revenue $7,300,000 $3, 100,000 Total Unfunded $4,200,000 O • Ia 1 e-77 Pavement Management Program Arterials and Collectors City of Spokane Valley 200V-2014 Preservation Projects Map Overlays and Reconstruction Only zx r---T-7--_...!---=-, .---- R. N. —■ , : 1 , , _.7-V.• _— — ...-- .... G _.. b,. eLscl,i ?...,-.7-' • • ' -- W.- — - , ,ca as - • — • _ _— - _ • ,2G —• _=.-- • — • ' - 'Kt - 1 .— — , — 37. — , _, • •••• . s3• , , • — —7 X . • — 7 leo)Av — 1,01tWAY- j11■1f.IVA■i-- 32nd.11.91 11PLN4191712T11.131 M ,• --‘,. 17‘, LAZZPO =02M-subrent.lc.D:e2.a.s.Vana nt, ■AIJ 1=111 ;4•4,•11dialC IMM-21.1=Wilt 2131:7r1=011:: ..1.1721/. =au ausi inTA 15■41.1ftd:v. T.P.LIIIM1rab =ma 7`. Sfieliane ......valley Pavement Management Program e Plan 1,1 e - t si 16771. itiLa I-.dr.',',,P'--I',, ■•.., 4.41-...-L —.."--'J J 4 V7-.:;•■,:e.....-.' r"F'-'"".. „ ‘,A -r- ' 1 ; ' .te .-j-k*- -ii.„ ., . Ti-- -Lii tt' -zi.-.. -r- ' _21i i Til ai'Fri „L.,„j,i 7tHi :2:2: —.---.......---4-i-- -: ,.,..„ MIERt.,...,ittkrt of.M.avonalkx4.,.. 1_, -.. Miligillfiaretra ; r117-.-1 44. -.2...iiii.. .....,,, ...,....--- 4 01:4" -lag MO' ir udi i .1 I 3 _ igazral .de rallIFIBMI ITIW5C-1128 Irmir0 i 111111.m mrsoliklaripalleire4 iiimusioaumpl -1 gillarnal 4P6111=1 it. -el MEERliierttl=m-riiitgai ii marrawsig m rsiEmaimmumesielEmen ..______ .7.0.116, miliaium■EmIlmr-dui, ra.. arommirroatz= ...mir--71/iimmilipinsimwraism ...riatliz : um , - PW•MNIELL =116=1.14 sm.. '--- -Mpg. ■ -;•• •„ . .• . • -ciricfspoki. . • 1 Mieavitur 7T : a 11 N7.,•!-Z. it", ., Legend era Wres:ForatletaSa .../.- .v :Rell• Ili. 1:V ll'\ tilt : .4010,reest :'-'2.1' :VP 41" Pliagni!Ca11,174. ..., t.Nitr■ INIelg ty4r;„, , 41.,..st:„..„ 111111 ' .:4::: .„...i.".....,45:::."--,i,......':',,,,I,_r_i•----------44 .1 - I ?.1 7..„...,..... .4-_, .5.!! -..i.,..• ==0,4.,,_,.--1 6, z.1:1-4 gpokan -- -----, i ! ... ....1 Ciarhin ' Crone Portchrford Acres "--'41-7A14-21-41 '11117-7-71 .Gmett Haven .1 g IV: 1 2t1 ‘..., g .3i !h, ., 'S r) 1 , j F 1‘'N-AL.--M:ke P'1:-iti:::'':7' ..-.._, ..... • We.Fr 4.,,....: C _*....,......,4t \ eri 1 ...: I South Green Ames City of Liberty Lako •: ""- ----- Val leyview r ( Colle‘dtors Street Preservation Projects 2009-2011 Proposed and Completed N • Legend School Hospital Foe Station Proposed Completed Not In P11P Rama,' 1■•• e 11,1=.1 RM. Public Works Dep2rtment Plotted tisha P.Fisch tee-epacteu Pavement Management Program 2008 Pavement Performance Recommendations To Correct Issues on Future Projects Street Standards Upgrades 1 . Increased geotechnical investigations of existing soil. 2. Accurate truck traffic assessments. 3. Require "Engineered" pavement section design. 4. Careful evaluation of asphalt cement mix design. 5. Increase minimum pavement section. 6. Increase fractured face requirement. 7. Increase moisture and compaction compliance testing. 8. Enhanced joint and pavement density compaction requirements. 9. Improved asphalt temperature monitoring and placement. 1 0.Use of stabilized sub-base (Asphalt or Cement Treated Base). 11 .Use Of Experienced, Full-time Construction Observers 01 �� maps `I'LL S S F rail i000valley Pavement Management Program 2011 Update Process • Utilized Automated Pavement inspection technology • Field Inspected one-third of Local Streets • Field Inspected half of the Arterials (WSDOT req'd) • Updated Computer Database • Consolidated road Segments • Evaluated Pavement Condition Changes 2011 • Refined Priorities, Protocols, and Procedures • Developed New Budgets • Current 2011 Budget Provided by CSV • Full recommended Budget 2012 to 2017 Silne %.000' l Pavement Management Program Good Poor Pavement Preservation Reconstruction Time sizor aster Plan Pavement Management Program Pavement Preservation Routine Maintenance • Patching • Shouldering Preventive Maintenance • Crack Sealing • Severe Crack Seal • Fog Sealing • Thin overlays Rehabilitation • Asphalt Overlays • Mill & Asphalt Overlays Pavement Management Program Preservation vs. Reconstruction • Preservation treatments are designed to be proactive, applied while the pavement is still in good condition and maintains the pavement at a high level of service Versus • Reconstruction is reactive repair to existing severely distressed pavement Most common approach to pavement maintenance h 'U n Pavement Management Program hr.tftil in Funding of 2008 Plan Results in Reconstruction Projects Impact of Reconstruction vs. Mill & Overlay Projects: • Project cost is 4 to 6 times more than preservation • Major Impact to businesses during construction • Traffic congestion for the public • Traffic safety concerns during construction • Significant increase in the time needed to construct the project \� °.?!l C..i. III r,CZ' •.�,.:r,= I!{ r :h-.� Pavement Management Program 2012 Pavement Management Plan Preventive Mill and Overlay Total Preservation Total Reconstruction Arterials & Collectors $175, 000 $5,825,000 $6,000,000 $2,500,000 Total Preservation & Reconstruction Estimate Revenue Total Unfunded Local Access (residential) Roads $500,000 $2,500, 000 $3,000,000 $1 ,787,000 $13,287,000 $2, 300, 000 $10,987,000 Arterials and Collectors City of Spokane Valley 2012- 201 / Freservation Projects Map Ft.J=1w 1.:A13 a ▪ M Mission Av rn — .rc"� " __ =-.-----, - =° _--——O. 327- I.5 — - -. 46 - - -1 • A Y-71- 1 -sa4 xx.e - X26 Euc A,y�-s' 44 El } a. r_._. or -.+a3 o- Cri I7• •+ a MISS 7i711 AV 0 - -8roadwaY-Av w mr _ -i_ — _ — _ os s ;Sa- a '7'1-1.1X1•• ur.- sa ex'm. sa I±y -- — G",_--= w __ ft.x ao proguc AV rot ea X49 `042nd 2012 Treatments ! I'd&Overby R€ccnstruct Legend 2015 Treatments mm Mill&Overlay Reconstruct Preventative Maintenance—Preventative Maintenance 2013 Treatments 2016 Treatments r &Overlay i liEl&Overlay Rcccnstru.. i Reconv,uct Preventative Maintenance --PreventativeMaintenance 2014 Treatments 2017 Treatments ®!III&Overlay r=,".J'iI13 Overlay o Reconstruct = Reconstruct PrevQriiative Maintenance---Preventative Maintenarycee,/ Ccrrvo ,p�kane .000Valley Pavement Management Program •. ' 2 3 Plan Year $2. 1 Million Annual Budget ys�u,�s y` `4_ � �^�'�j�� i l ; ��1 ��'i� �` �4-I�y,, _ _ S1iea 'u`'�v�"J L I J:ES.s 7 r r W E+ Pavement Management Program Six Year Existing Budget Locals (2o12-2o17) 100 90 80 70 60 a 50 40 30 20 10 0 Locals 71 68 0 1 $200,000 Annual Budget 63 61 58 2 3 4 5 Plan Year a4 Siiokarie Iiaster Milley Pavement Management Program Funding Options Discussion Option 1 • Full funding at $10,957,000 Option 2 • Fund Preservation only at $6,700,000 Option 2 • Fund the Arterial Preservation Shortfall = $4,000,000 • Fund partial Residential Shortfall = $500,000 • Request Grant Funding for Reconstruction Projects Option 3 • Other?? Sfioliane StreeL. liEsar Plan Pavement Management Program 1 . Determine Level of Funding Option 2. Discuss Funding Sources Preservation Project# Funding Preservation Souce Total Project Cost $Amt 2009 Completed 1 Sprague Ave./Pines Rd. PCCP Intersection 1 Sprague Ave./Evergreen Rd. PCCP Intersection 1 Sprague Ave./McDonald Rd. PCCP Intersection 1 Sprague Ave. Rehabilitation Project; University Rd.to Evergreen Rd. Broadway Ave. Rehabilitation Phase 11 Overlay; Fancher Rd.to 1-90 18 Broadway Ave./Fancher Rd. PCCP Intersection Blake Rd. Repair Project; 10th Ave.to 12th Ave. 5 Schafer Rd.; Cimmaron Dr.to Dishman-Mica Rd. Crack Sealing Proposed 2 Sullivan Rd.; Euclid Ave.to Trent Ave. 3 32nd Ave.; Dishman-Mica Rd.to Pines Rd. 4 Flora Rd.; Euclid Ave. (5)to Euclid Ave. (N) 6 Euclid Ave.;Sullivan Rd.to Flora Rd. CIP $900,690.00 $160,700 CIP $714,186.00 $160,080 CIP $676,187.00 $146,480 CIP $2,663,675.00 $1,759,740 CIP $635,696.00 $224,000 CIP $683,673.00 $118,000 Street $77,967 Street $142,860 Street $138,801 Total Spent 0 $2,928,628 $766,500 $617,380 $37,256 $222,214 Unfunded 1 $1,643,350 Preservation Project# Funding Preservation Sauce Total Project Cost $Amt 2010 Corrasaleted 12 Sprague Ave./Sullivan Rd. PCCP Intersection CIP Broadway Ave./Sullivan Rd. PCCP Intersection CIP 23 Indiana Ave. EB Overlay;West Mall Entrance to East Mall Entrance Street 10 Bowdish Rd. Overlay;Dishman-Mica Rd.to 36th Ave. Street 6 Euclid Av. Inside EB Lane Overlay;Sullivan Rd.to Flora Rd. Street 19 Park Rd. Overlay;Sprague Av.To Valley Way Street 16th Av. Overlay; Carnahan St.to Wardson St. Street Vercler Rd. Paving; 10th Ave.to 12th Ave. Street 11th Ave.; Bettman Rd.to Eastern Rd. Street Crack Sealing Street Proposed 7 Euclid Ave.; Flora Rd.to Barker Rd. Street 8 Fancher Rd.;Sharp Ave.to Mission Ave. Street 9 25th Ave.;Vercler Rd.to Tall Tree Rd. Street 10 Bowdish Rd.; Dishman-Mica Rd.to 32nd Ave. Street 11 Farr Rd.; 8th Ave.to Sprague Ave. Street 12 Sprague Ave.; Evergreen Rd.to Sullivan Rd. CIP 13 Park Rd.; Broadway Ave.to Indiana Ave. Street $995,490.00 $217,193 $750,343.00 $135,149 $112,500 $126,400 $73,500 $89,600 $133,900 $20,000 $50,800 $369,000 Total Spent $1,328,042 $293,621 $32,987 $83,825 $62,207 $176,731 $1,045,022 $2,010,130 Unfunded I $3,704,523 Preservation Project# Funding Preservation Souce Total Project Cost $Amt 2011 Completed 15 Indiana Ave./Sullivan Rd. PCCP Intersection CIP 26 Broadway Ave.Overlay; Park Rd.to Vista Rd. Street 23 Indiana Ave.WB Overlay;West Mall Entrance to East Mall Entrance Street Bowdish Rd. Overlay; 16th Ave.to 22nd Ave. Street 6 Euclid Ave.WB Overlay;Sullivan Rd.to R/R Xing(one lane) Street 18 Faucher Rd. Overlay; Broadway Ave.to Trent Ave. Street Sprague Ave.WB Overlay; Havana St.to Fancher Rd. Street Wellesley Ave. Overlay;Sunnyvale Rd.to Flora Rd. Street 22nd Ave.;Vera Crest Dr.to Conklin Rd. Street :Froraosed 14 University Rd. Overlay; 8th Ave.to Dishman-Mica Rd. Street 15 Sullivan Rd. Overlay; Indiana Ave.to Euclid Ave. Street 16 Pines Rd. Overlay; 16th Ave.to 32nd Ave. Street 17 Appleway Ave. Overlay;Argonne Rd.to University Rd. Street 18 Fancher Rd. Overlay;Sprague Ave.to Railroad Ave. Street $1,309,903.00 $208,648 $217,980 $1.15,800 $138,600 $85,800 $216,800 $213,000 $42,300 $94,400 Total Spent I $1,333,328 $966,082 $543,258 $635,918 $691,174 $580,728 Unfunded $3,417,160 `f 1 E 1 t7i 'ice' i n i cI _ r ��' ', -� Pavement Management Program Pavoranerati Management Flan Update 26 '1. 1 0 , Ir , I , / 1 1 • . i r 1 I f ''1 I I sI I I 1 I : I l ' 1 I 1 1 111 4 r I I I I Y I ! I I Prepared for C aty of Spokane Valley September, 2011 (JIM I I I . J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 422 W. Riverside Avenue, Suite 304 Spokane, Washington 99201-0302 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE 2011 1 INTRODUCTION 1 REPORT HIGHLIGHTS 3 2011 ANALYSIS AND UPDATE .............................................................. 1. Segment Consolidation 7 2. Automated Pavement Inspection .,..8 Local Access (residential) Street Deterioration 9 Pavement Performance Issues and Recommendations 10 Evaluation of Repair and Maintenance Treatments 11 BUDGET SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT 13 Arterial and Collectors 13 Local Access (residential) Streets 19 RECOMMENDATIONS 25 APPENDICES 1. AUTOMATED PAVEMENT INSPECTIONS METHODOLOGY 2. PROJECT EVALUATION RECOMMENDATIONS 3. DETERIORATION OF ROAD SEGMENTS 4. COMPARISON OF PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX (PCI) AND OVERALL CONDITION INDEX (OCI)' Y . . 1 r e . I 11111k II / 5. ARTERIAL PROJECTS 2011 OCI Map: Arterials and, Collectors ' Arterials and Collectors, 2012 —2017 Projects Map -- Overlays, Reconstruction, and Preventative Maintenance B 2012-2017 Proposed Budget—Arterials and Collectors — Preservation and Maintenance Projects List and Cost 6. LOCAL ACCESS (RESIDENTIAL) PROJECTS 2011 OCI Map: Local Access (Residential) Local Access (Residential), 2012 — 2017 Projects Map — Overlays, Reconstruction, and Preventative Maintenance 9 2012-2017 Proposed Budget — Local Access (Residential) — Preservation and Maintenance Projects List and Cost PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE 2011 INTRODUCTION In June of 2007, the city completed their first development of a citywide Pavement Management Plan (PMP) and in 2008 the first update was completed. This update to the PMP is intended as an effort to monitor roadway pavement conditions on an ongoing basis. RCW 46.68.113 requires "large cities" to collect pavement condition data on the functionally classified Arterial and Collector network every two years. The pavement condition data is due to the Washington State Department of Transportation in September every even numbered year. J-U-B ENGINEERS INC. (J-U-B) assisted the City of Spokane Valley with this effort and submitted the pavement conditions per the RCW. This 2011 update includes additional field condition inspections of city streets and input of updated data into a computer'rnodeI, Cartegraph Pavement View and Pavement View Plus. The computer model allows the City to analyze and rate the city streets by Overall Condition Index (OCI) of 0 (failed) to 100 (new). The primary goal of a PMP is to develop long term maintenance strategies that minimize the costs to the city. Instrumental in that effort is maximizing the,maintenance of roads through annual crack sealing and fog sealing, while minimizing major rehabilitation and reconstruction costs. Budget `scenarios were developed for existing city funding levels to compare with proposed funding levels that attempt to maintain the streets at a minimum average 70 OCI for Arterials/Collectors and 65 OCI for Local Access (residential) roads. This report updates the results of 2010 field inspections, modeling updates and modified recommendations for budget strategies. As recommended in the 2007 report, roadway condition surveys should occur bi-annually for Arterials, and every three to five years for Local Access (residential) roads. Over time, the data will aid the city in establishing road condition trends and appropriate budget forecasting. Major components of the 2011 Update include the following: 1 sv 2011 pmp 1-23-12 ➢ Use of an Automated Pavement Inspection Process. (Infrastructure Management Services [IMS] was tasked with completing the Automated Pavement Process) Previously inspections were conducted visually. ➢ Field inspected one=third of Local Access (residential) streets. (PMP recommended re-inspecting all Local Access (residential) streets every three- five years.) • Field inspected one-half of the Arterial roads. (WSDOT bi-annual report on Arterials was due in the fall of 2010). > Consolidated the Road Network Segments from 5,000 to 2,000. • Updated the Cartegraph computer database. Updated Activity Unit Costs, input construction projects over the past three years including Septic Tank Elimination Program (STEP) projects. ➢ Evaluated pavement condition changes experienced in 2010. > Refined project prioritization, protocols, and strategy procedures. > Analyzed budget strategies to evaluate the impact on long term roadway conditions to include: a The current $2.3 million City budget o Budget needed to maintain the desired OCI and prevent additional road segments from falling into the reconstruction OCI range 2 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 REPORT HIGHLIGHTS Table 1 summarizes the City's estimated 2012 annual street Maintenance & Rehabilitation (M&R) revenue distribution. Preservation includes work such as crack sealing, fog sealing, patching, shoulder repair, grading, and overlays and mill & overlays. Major reconstruction involves total reconstruction of the roadway, including the base material. This estimated revenue was provided by City staff as the baseline for evaluating strategies for future recommendations. Table 1. 2012 Estimated Annual City Streets M&R Anticipated Revenue Distribution for Pavement Preservation 1 Estimate Future 2012 City Revenue City Revenue Capital Projects $300,000 $800000 Street Maintenance Fund $1,500,000 $1,500000 Street Maintenance $500,000 Fund* Total $2,300,000 $ 2,300,000 *One-time contribution from Street Maintenance Fund undesignated fund balance. The principle of pavement management is to perform regular maintenance of the roadways at lower costs and retain a higher overall pavement condition. The goal being to minimize or delay higher cost reconstruction in future years. The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) is the agency that recommends historical pavement characteristics. The general overall Pavement Deterioration Curve recommended by ASTM shows that $1 of preservation at 75% of its life will cost $4 to $10 if delayed until 40% of its life remains. Figure 1 depicts this relationship of condition deterioration over time. For example, completing a maintenance project such as crack sealing on a road segment with 75% of life remaining will cost 8 to 10 times less than allowing that road to deteriorate to a level that would require a full reconstruction. The cost differential 1 It should be noted that$1 million dollars of the$2.3 million dollar budget is typically allocated to PMP related projects to address immediate needs such as pothole repairs, patches, one-lane overlays. The dollars allocated for these repairs may or may not be listed in the PMP plan but these repairs do provide improvements to the road segment OCI. 3 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 between mill and overlay and reconstruction is on the order of 4 to 6 times more for reconstruction projects. Figure 1. General Pavement Deterioration Curve Crack Seal Mill & Overlay Excellent 0 c)... 40?7c)--drop in 'Fm\>..-----)F ----""N\ quality Each $1 of repair - 75% of life not done here , . c Good 0 ;-:' . . .will cost $4 o Fair - to $10 if 3 4a° drop in ,41-- delayed to c Poor - quality here E ,,12% of life `— > Failed I1Il1llll1ll Will 11llllf 5 10 15 20 25 30 Year Results of the field inspections and computer analysis of existing roads in 2011 finds that the overall OCI for the road network compared to 2008 is as follows: 2008 2011 2017 • Arterial/Collector OCI 67 64 58 • Local Access (residential) OCI 71 71 58 The projected OCI for the Arterial/Collector roads is expected to deteriorate to an OCI of 58 by the end of 2017 using the current estimated $2.1 million dollar Arterial budget. The projected OCI for the Local Access (residential) roads is expected to deteriorate to an OCI of 58 by the end of 2017 using the current $200,000 Local Access (residential) 4 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 road budget. Figures 2a and 2b illustrate this predicted pavement condition deterioration over the next 6 years for both Arterial and Local Access (residential) roads using the current $2.3 million dollar budget. The 2008 Report projected the 2010 Arterial OC1 to be 68 using the City's projected budget of$2.9 million dollars annual average. The report also predicted a 2010 Local Access (residential) OCI of 63 using the City's projected average annual budget of$1.7 million dollars. The OCI increase for the Local Access (residential) roads can be attributed to the STEP projects as described below. The decrease in OCI for the Arterial roads from 67 in 2008 to 64 in 2011 can be attributed to several factors including a decline in grant funding and database refinements such as segment consolidation and updated pavement inspection information. The key factor for the OCI decrease was due to the lack of significant projects in the year 2010 and 2011. This budget does not include grant or STEP dollars received by the City to fund the reconstruction or upgrade of Arterial roads. The 2011 Updated Arterial OCI follows closely the projected trend from the 2008 report showing a difference in OCI of 4 points. The Local Access (residential) roads are showing a substantial increase in OCI from 2008 to 2011. Two reasons for the increase in Local Access (residential) roads OCI are 1) the analysis software did not account for predicted future STEP projects and 2) the 2010 analysis has included three years of substantial completed STEP projects. The software does not provide for the inclusion of future anticipated projects, only predicted projects defined by the program protocols. In the future, anticipated projects will need to be incorporated into the program by hand to account for their impact on road condition. 5 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 Figure 2a. Predicted Six-Year OCI Using 2010 M & R Revenue (Arterials) Arterials 100 - 90 --Excellent 80 69 Very Good 70 64 63 62 61 60 =_--- 59 58 60 011 NM Good „ .,-- 40 Ii •- ■ - ■ ■ CI 5°30 -1 - - III . 20 , ._.,. .----M. —111 _A - _ ■ " rlery Poo 0 �i- l 1_T- Failed a A . 1 1 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (2010) Plan Year (2017) Figure 2b. Predicted Six-Year OCI Using 2010 M & R Revenue (Local) Locals 100 90 Excellent — 80 74 71 Very Good 69 68 70 - - -- 66 . 63 - - 61 58 60 — - _ __ Good 6O 50 -- ,- NI ' - -". . 40 30 — Poor ` U I 20 - - ery Poo IM°- ■ All i 10 — FFailede ,. 0 _ _ r- -T I - . 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (2010) Plan Year (2017) 6 1 SV 2011 PIMP 1-23-12 Several strategies were evaluated to develop a future budget that would continue to maintain the overall city roads. The 2011 recommendations are separated into functionally classified roads, (Arterials and Collectors), and Local Access (residential) roads. As established in previous reports, the goal over time is to maintain a 70 OCI for Arterials/Collectors and a 65 OCI for Local Access (residential) roads. Another condition was added to ensure additional road segments do not fail into the reconstruction status. Table 1 illustrates a comparison of funding levels for 2007 and 2011. Grant funds for maintenance and rehabilitation projects such as mill and overlays have decreased over the last three years. Table 1 also shows the 2012 estimated City Revenue for road preservation and rehabilitation for both Arterials and Local Access (residential) roads. 2011 ANALYSIS AND UPDATE Updating the citywide PMP began with field inspection of one-third of the Local Access (residential) streets and half of the Arterial streets. The PMP recommends inspecting all of the Local Access (residential) streets in a three year cycle and all of the Arterials and Collectors every two years. Two significant changes occurred this year in the process of analyzing the road systems. 1. The massive data files for each individual roadway segment were consolidated into more manageable segments, thus streamlining analysis. 2. Inspections were conducted using automated equipment rather than visual field inspections These two changes described in detail below, have added a significant level of difficulty to this year's analysis when compared against the old data. 1. Segment Consolidation The large pavement database was consolidated into larger road segments, reducing the database from 5,000 to approximately 2,000 segments. The consolidation process involved re-segmenting the roads into more logical and longer segments. Previously the database road segments were broken down by each city block, each segment being one block. The road network has been re-calibrated; segments now begin and end at a functionally classified road. For example, Sprague Avenue from University to 7 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 Evergreen is now two segments instead of 10. Since the 2008 update the amount of historical data in the database has grown substantially. This historical data, including, past mill and overlay projects, reconstruction projects, STEP projects, crack seal projects, mill and inlay projects, etc. have been used to update and refine the database. 2. Automated Pavement Inspection A significant change to the field inspection procedures for the 2011 update included using Automated Inspection instead of the manual (visual) inspection conducted in the past. Automated field inspection provided several advantages such as: 8 Time savings 8 Safety 8 Consistency 8 Easily input into the Cartegraph database In previous updates field inspection was accomplished using manual inspection by field personnel consisting of 4 -6 people in groups of two. Each group went out into the field to measure pavement distress on a sample segment basis. The inspections covered approximately two-fifths of all of the Local Access (residential) roads and all of the Arterials and Collectors. This work took approximately three months to complete. Using the automated field inspection method one-half of the Arterials and Collectors and one-third of the Local Access (residential) roads were cataloged in five days. The automated inspection is by far safer in that staff will no longer have to venture into the traveled lanes to measure or review pavement distresses. All work is done inside the comfort of a vehicle. Consistency increased due to the highly technical equipment used for the automated inspection. The tools used to measure distress do not rely on a subjective human eye. All of the pavement inspection data collected using automation was successfully transferred into the existing Cartegraph database. This saved several clays of database 8 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 manipulation and formatting. While the cost of inspection increased, the cost of data manipulation decreased for an overall net zero (0) cost differential. IMS was chosen to provide the automated pavement inspection for this project. IMS had the ability to meet the schedule and provide high quality inspection information for the model. IMS also has a Cartegraph expert on their staff to manage the data transfer into the existing database. Refer to Appendix for additional IMS inspection information. Local Access (residential) Street Deterioration Figure 3 shows the deterioration curves used in the City's analysis. The first line, "Fitted Spokane Valley 001 curve (Local)" is the deterioration curve for the Local Access (residential) roads only. The second curve is the default deterioration curve for the Arterials, Collector and Local Access (residential) roads as provided by the Cartegraph software and the third curve is the PCI curve. The difference between the OCI and PCI is that the PCI is calculated solely based on the pavement inspections. The OCI is calculated based on the pavement inspection, pavement age, pavement type. See Appendix 4.Figure 3. Option 1 a Comparison of Deterioration Curves Arterial/Collector OCI Comparison 120 _ —11 1111111 100 T - 80 . t ,: IlIlIlIlIl ,Fitted 60 „■, 1 ,.,h„u,. Culrve OCI ■1■11■ IR1II11I P 40 ,, l& 20 , �iiL! Ill Curve) 0 11111111 PCl Curve _20 111 11111111 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 35 40 Age 9 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 Initially the standard, default ASTM deterioration curves were used in the analysis. Since the 2006 and 2008 updates a historical database has been collected. The historical data can now be used to refine the pavement deterioration and 001 curves to fit actual conditions. As a result, the Local Access (residential) 001 deterioration curve has been updated based on the historic information. See Figure 3. The OCI curve for Arterials and Collectors will be retained until the historic data analysis results in a curve update, The Local Access (residential) 001 deterioration curve was updated based on 1-2 years of pavement inspections between 2006 and the 2011 update. Over the past 4 years we have inspected all Local Access (residential) roads at least once and in some cases multiple times. The curve adjustment is based on the inspection of each of the approximately 1,700 Local Access (residential) road segments. It was very clear that the curve based on pavement inspections did not follow the standard ASTM curve as shown in Table 3. The Local Access (residential) road segments followed the fitted deterioration curve much more closely compared to the ASTM curve thus prompting the adjustment. The Arterial OCI deterioration curve is much more difficult to justify an adjustment with so few data points. There are 304 Arterial road segments, each road segment having been inspected at least 2 times. There are not enough inspection points to confidently adjust the Arterial deterioration curve at this time. Adjustments will be made after additional information is collected in future years, Pavement Performance Issues and Recommendations The City of Spokane Valley will need to continue to modify the deterioration curves to more accurately reflect the actual field conditions of the roadway network. There appears to be areas in which the Arterial/Collector roads are deteriorating prematurely. Included in the Appendix are examples of premature deterioration on Sprague and Appleway Boulevard. This section shows the OCI trends and an estimated cost to improve these road segments. Again, there is a serious need to reserve funds for ongoing maintenance of the road network. There is also a need to utilize current design 10 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 and construction standards to ensure that future overlay and reconstruction projects perform adequately for 20+ years. Road segments such as Sprague and Appleway, as described above, and Argonne are all showing signs of premature failure. These roads are showing substantial cracking and are nearing failure. These road segments are between 5-10 years old with a design pavement life of 20 years, yet these roads need overlays within the next few years. In order to prevent premature failure of the road section in the future the City conducted a pavement performance study in 2008. Some of the recommended changes are as follows: 1. Increased geotechnical investigations of existing soil. 2. Accurate truck traffic assessments. 3. Require "Engineered" pavement section design. 4. Careful evaluation of asphalt cement mix design. 5. Increase minimum pavement section. 6. Increase fractured face requirement. 7. Increase moisture and compaction compliance testing. 8. Enhanced joint and pavement density compaction requirements. 9. Improved asphalt temperature monitoring and placement. 10.Use of stabilized subbase (Asphalt or Cement Treated Base). The full extent of the report developed by J-U-B can be found under separate cover in "Pavement Performance Issues and Recommendations" October, 2008. Evaluation of Repair and Maintenance Treatments The City of Spokane Valley is in need of an effective surface treatment between crack sealing and overlay for the Arterial/Collector and Local Access (residential) road network. Potential solutions include Fog Seals, Seal Coats, Slurry Seals and Micro- Pave. Fog seal is not an effective treatment in extending the life of the pavement for the higher volume Arterials/Collectors roadways. As a result, the City may want to experiment with various treatments over time to find the most effective preventive maintenance treatment. Identifying and using a high quality surface treatment 2-3 years 11 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 prior to mill and overlay will bring down the long-term cost by further extending the life of the pavement. A high quality surface treatment could delay the need for a mill and overlay 3-5 years assuming the treatment is done on the correct road segment and at the appropriate time. It is recommended that the City select 2-3 treatments to be applied to several roadways throughout the city. City staff will evaluate the performance of the treatments on a yearly basis. Once the City is confident on the performance of a particular treatment it will be added to the PMP as a recommended activity for future years. This treatment will be used to bridge the gap between crack seal and mill and overlay. A potential solution to fill this gap is a seal coat called GSB88. GSB88 seal coat rejuvenates the asphalt by penetrating the surface asphalt. GSB88 contains polymers that adhere to the aggregates thus adding new life the oxidized asphalt. Typical Fog Seals such as a CSS-9 h do not penetrate the asphalt; the oil remains on the top surface and tends to wear out more quickly over time. The goal being to extend the life of the pavement 3-5 years until an overlay can be completed. This type of treatment allows the City to extend the life of pavements while preventing the road segment from falling into the reconstruction category, a much more costly alternative. J-U-B's recommendation is to conduct site specific test seal coats to gauge the potential of this and other products. The City has discovered a treatment for severe longitudinal joint cracking. This crack seal material is used to seal the longitudinal pavement joints on Arterial/Collector roadways. The crack repair material is called Deery Level and Go, manufactured by Craftco. This product has been successfully applied to the failed longitudinal joints on Thierman, Dishman-Mica, 32nd with great success. The advantages of this product are as follows: ® Structurally sound material — this material can withstand heavy traffic loads while being flexible to allow for shrinking and swelling. ® Plastic--this material is very flexible and will not pull away from the existing ,• asphalt during times of expansion and contraction. 12 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 • This product is very easy to apply and will setup quickly to minimize road closures/restrictions. This treatment will improve and extend the life of a road which a failed longitudinal pavement joint is the only real distress in the that particular segment. BUDGET SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT The 2011 Pavement Management Plan Update evaluated the impact to road conditions for various City budgets moving forward. In the current economic state, additional funding options are limited. This budget analysis update will attempt to keep as many of the pavements from serious deterioration as possible. The 2011 update evaluates two options for funding the maintenance of streets with limited budget over the next six years until a more focused program can be developed: Option 1 — Continue with 2011 revenue of$2,100,000 for Arterials and Collectors and $200,000 for Local Access (residential) streets. The overall network OCI is expected to be much lower than 70. Option 2 — Establish a budget that maintains a "good" rating equal to a 65 OCI for Local Access (residential) streets and a "very good" rating equal to a 70 001 for Arterials and Collectors. The results of these options are presented herein for both the Arterial and Collectors and the Local Access (residential) streets separately. These are separated since they use different deterioration curves while preventing additional roads from falling into the reconstruction OCI range. Arterial and Collectors In general, the changes to the protocols and priorities have been refined and improved to give better OCI values and a project list that enables the City to select projects that will provide the most value for the dollar spent. Several of the high priority Arterial roads have mill & overlay work recommended within the six year forecast. As a result of not fully funding the 2008 pavement management plan, the analysis identified 14 road segments that are currently failed with an OCI less than 30. The list of failed road 13 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 segments is summarized below. The goal is to head off more expensive future reconstruction projects as well as preventing future roads from falling into the reconstruction 001 range. In addition to costing 4-6 times more than preservation projects, reconstruction results in other significant impacts. O Increase in the time needed to construct the project • Major Impact to businesses on or near the project ® Traffic congestion for the motoring public o Traffic safety concerns during construction Tables 3 and 4, and figures 4a &4b summarize the six year projects for both Option #1 and Option #2 and compares the OCI trend. Option 2 will maintain an average 70 OCI and prevent future roads from falling into the reconstruction range. Reconstruction project costs are not included in the Option 2 budget at this time. The reconstruction project list is provided to give the City the option to reconstruct these roads as funds become available. Roads that are failed may not necessarily need to be reconstructed immediately, project evaluation should occur on a case-by-case basis. Over the six year program we recommend the reconstruction projects be systematically improved at a rate of$2.83 million per year. As described above, there are currently 14 road segments that are in need of a reconstruction. If steps are not taken to maintain the existing pavements immediately this number will steadily grow over time. For example, if no action is taken in 2012, the number of roads in the reconstruction category grows from 14 to 19 road segments. 14 SV 2011 AMP 1-23-12 7711 Prrgastd P:?get-1.rteri is 7^4 Ea'1t33Z-P444 24411473 Progn•a 01y of 5p1i an.Va"ef 27177,7 em entW7•aiamentp3en Ilpdrie r Stormwatea Prefect Segment Number Pavement Improved Suggested Over/Udder Upgrades No. ID 011 Route From To Plan Activity of Lanese Area(Sr) 0(1 Alan Cost Budget•" Suggested Budget. (Y/N) 6.0 7.34 1 RerataWafioo Frolara. 21 67 23.275pra6:eAv e7e•7•sen Adams AC-9e an-str02•Arterial 7 737311 13,61 53,12577497 , 51 63 lt233L33• a'.AV 97-, 3vfnvan 1C-P 7t P .H el 7 73:175 47.41 51,143181.13 71 11 JJJJJJJJJJ 7-r 6o4 r i1C P A ori.l 1 $1969 53.66 $ 769.57 :Mr 141-0 4 -t..�al 7 171711 104 0 EU707 Ay Ed 1vlllvan IAC.P t t,A_.:71 2 :1430 19.64, 3515.79/177 103 h Y 7/4 7 1 9 a n 0.d 4521161'1 A C 47•A e-al 2 171771 93,69 5144574131 109 iy-+, ill_r.,,. mat '55577 MIIIIMMINIESEISI 112 15@ lijill Euclid AV 51114an Marfetta C-Recon7trvd-Mar al 14•531 59.64 51933203.76 125 2 FroVe4.57 05.5'.4 Lewin C-Raedvtn7A!-Marla' 2 11100 53.66 546041452 171 ii; : 1.I---. ' 145 1905 29.71 Eud,4Ar Marlette Hare AC-R46anstn7d-17111171 1 53717 9316 31231,90211 , 141 241 23323 Nora Rd evelld '04417 ,SC-Reraastnxt-Arterial 1 17221 59.44 624,73080 141 1511 217357.111 an Pd 1•7 473 my 27.7 14C-5.7On4141d*Me7171 2 22172 6916 579150125 140 r��.=...__,t., ... :..af —_:...r S4 L i ri a 1 117.063579 31 Mt 117o4SpaianaV.Ileyad'CdetIola!17 4 33 49117 3ndaF N$101,'',doll.",oalha312o3ran is IF art on P7F.i4el ate d prof ada 5,611 as pa17,,ala rep era,pecchir1 e',&,laxa.eriarsr-1 etherinune7atrneeds as they Md.. •• 3}e}'tJal7shledroadwa,scvnid I..ave be rlayad In 2011,777th a teconl•rnended 1.4770r.41 is a fdlrerc-stn.d - —TheWj11'jhted raa:na,scosld 1,.e h-en a.e4a,d 1n2011,na.v Lhe tecon•;ananited 044244,0.4 fa 1141 recastn3 Share ar,57 aa-991'9atedra,91 I n 2111,,.71,.,n"'rater'a rec9*914-e 114..5reeral of.1-1479 h.,a ke en re:ansUU4edo7 ha4 an 00.14:t. .53 . base/Inn the 2320 5011•sp345:. Nate:Tht anal betAeen a mrl77 7 0,449 a*49911 reco•str.c0an 11 7.710_01-rre'y 671-es 15 sv 2011 pmp 1.2312 Table 3 indicates that continuing at the present budget will result in a downward trend in overall pavement condition for Arterials and Collectors. if this is not reversed, the cost for future repairs will increase as described in the general ASTM Deterioration Curve Figure 1. Table 3. Option 1 —Six Year Budget at $2.1 Million Year Total OCI 2012 $2,100,000 65.1 2013 $2,100,000 63.4 2014 $2,100,000 ' 61.7 2015 $2,100,000 60.3 2016 $2,100,000 58.9 2017 $2,100,000 57.5 Total $12,600,000 Figure 4a - Option 1 — Six Year Budget'at $2.1 Million Arterials 100 90 80 70 65 63 62 60 59 58 50 ■ . O 40 30 - 20 10 1111 a -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 (2012) Plan Year 16 sv 2011 pmp 1-23-12 Table 4. Option 2 - Six Year Need Year Total OCI 2012 $5,663,000 67.8 2013 $6,058,000 68.4 2014 $6,184,000 69.2 2015 $6,163,000 70.1 2016 $6,203,000 71.0 2017 $6,053,000 71.5 Total $36,322,000 Table 4 shows the ongoing funding must be increased by approximately $4,000,000 annually to maintain a 70 OCI. The total plan year budget represents $175,000 in preventative maintenance with the balance dedicated to mill and overlay projects. Figure 4b - Option 2 - Six Year Budget Arterials 100 90 80 68 68 69 70 71 72 60 . . . 50 ■ ■ 40 ■ 30 .III . . . 20 . . ■ . 10 1111 0 - • 1 2 3 4 5 6 (2012) Plan Year 17 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 Figures 5 and 6 graphically compare the budgets and OCI for Options 1 and 2. Figure 5. Arterial Streets Budget Comparison $10.0 -. - -- $9.0 $8.0 _ $7.0 - $6,0 ta o $5.0 i IIII $4.0 - $3.0 $2.0 Ti — 51.0 $0.D t 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Budget Year El2011 Option 1,$2.1M •2011 Option 2,Maintain Level 70 OCI ( Figure 6. Arterial Streets OCI Comparison Arterial/Collector OCI Comparison 75 - 70 65 60 _ 65 1,$2.1M aption 2 , 45 - 5, ' . . Do Nothing �i 40 1 1 - 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Budget Year I. 18 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 Local Access (residential) Streets The tables and charts below show the resultant pavement conditions using the existing funding level compared to a budget option for maintaining the Local Access (residential) street network at a 65 OCI level. Tables 5 and 6 summarize the six year needs for Options 1 and 2. Table 5. Option 1 - Six Year Budget at$200,000 Year Total OCI 2012 $200,000 70.8 2013 $200,000 68.3 2014 $200,000 65.8 2015 $200,000 63.3 2016 $200,000 60.7 2017 $200,000 58.2 $1,200,000 Figure 7a Six Year Budget at $200,000 Locals 100 90 80 71 70 68 -- 66 63 61 60 f - - -- 58 u a 50 -- 30 • _— — – 10 - - ,_. 1 2 3 4 5 6 (2012) Plan Year 19 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 Table 6. Option 2=Six Year Need Year Total OCI 2012 $2,999,000 73.4 2013 $2,776,000 72.2 2014 $2,999,000 70,8 2015 $2,996,000 69.5 2016 $2,899,000 68.0 2017 $2,996,000 66.5 $18,001,000 Figure 7b — Six Year Budget at $3 Million Dollars Locals 100 — — 90 80 73 72 71 70 68 67 70 60 o 40 . ■ ■ . ■ 40 ■ 30 — . ■ . ■ 20 10 - 0 —i r - 1 2 3 4 5 6 Plan Year At the present budget, the pavement condition will deteriorate beyond the desired 65 OCI level. Even with Option 2 funding increases, the pavement conditions will still deteriorate slowly over time. But the Option 2 funding level will keep the local access OCI at or above 65 though the year 2019. 20 8V 2011 PMP 1-23-12 Funding has been lacking for Local Access (residential) street projects. Local Access (residential) streets make up approximately 85% of the city's street network. Typically the maintenance treatment costs for these streets is lower than that for Arterials and Collectors so money spent on Local Access (residential) streets will go further and last longer than money spent on the classified roads. Figure 8 compares the funding levels for each option. Figure 8. Local Access (residential) Street Budget Comparison $4.0 , $3.5 $3,0 $2.5 N o $2.0 $1,5 $1.0 $0.5 $o.o 1-1 f [ f f i 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Budget Year c]Option 1,$200K •Option 2,$3,000,000 1 21 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 Comparing pavement condition for each option in Figure 8, it can be seen that the Local Access (residential) street network is in good condition now but its condition is dropping rapidly under the existing funding level. Over the past three years the Local Access (residential) road OCI has improved due to the Spokane County STEP program. The program resulted in a complete reconstruction for many of the Local Access (residential) roads that otherwise would have not received a treatment. Each year of delay in increasing Local Access (residential) street funding adds a significant cost to keep the Local Access (residential) streets at a 65 OCI and maintaining that level. Figure 9. Local Access (residential) Street OCI Comparison Local Street OCI Comparison 75 70 "*., 111111110m.— ra 65 UO 60 -Option 1 -Option 2 55 Do Nothing 50 - 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Budget Year Most of the recommended Local Access (residential) road work is focused in the area of the city south of Sprague between Dishman-Mica Road and Sullivan Road. Local Access (residential) street projects were grouped together by neighborhood as much as possible. This resulted in some streets being done ahead of others for the sake of efficiency over the identified priority of work. There may be situations where a street segment is omitted from work even when adjacent segments are done because it is in too poor of condition to be overlaid and there is not enough funding for reconstruction. It is possible some of these roads could 22 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 have minor repairs done and then be overlaid rather than reconstructed but the decision must be made by city staff on a case-by-case basis. Reconstruction project costs are not included in the Option 2 budget at this time. The reconstruction project list is provided to give the City the option to reconstruct these roads as funds become available. Roads that are failed may not necessarily need to be reconstructed immediately, project evaluation should occur on a case-by-case basis. Over the six year program we recommend the reconstruction projects be systematically improved at a rate of$1.79 million per year. As described above, there are currently 27 road segments that are in need of a reconstruction. If steps are not taken to maintain the existing pavements immediately this number will steadily grow over time. 23 SV 2011 PN➢P 1-23-12 1 2011 Proposed Budget-Local Access(Residential)Roads-Preservation Program qty of Spokane Valley 2011 Pavement Management Plan Update _ Segment Segment Segment ID\riurnber I0\Pavement Improve ID OCI Segment ID\Route Sewn entl0\Route Back 5egmentID\Route Ahead Plan Activity of Lanes Area dOCI Plan Cost Plan Year Reconstruction Projects 1953 17.76 Vera Crest Dr End 24th - AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 r 143326.80 17.76 $1,686,955.44 605 11.15 Jackson CO-Oa-so:Dr End Jackson • AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 4000.00 11.15 $54142.00 928 14.89 Whipple Rd End Main AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 5020.08 14,89 $59,686..34 • 597 18.05 MariettaAv McMiIlan Montgomery . AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 25262.40 18.05 $297,333.45 1715 18.1 Sonora Dr 24th End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2' 28702.08 18..1 $337,823.43_ 1594 18.5 20th Ct Vera Crest End - _ AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 17603.60 18,5 $207,144.37 _ 607 20.54 Montgomery Cul-De-Sac Dr Montgomery End AC•Reconstructlon-Lacal 2 3800.00 20.94 $44,726.00 1006 21.5 AIkIAv Barker Mlc0'gen• - AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 38822.16 21.5 $456,936.82 604 29.47 McMillan Rd Montgomery Buckeye • AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 34139.20 29.47 $401815,38 606 9.04 Montgomery Cul-De-Sac Dr Montgomery End - AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 4520.00 9.04 $53,200.40 554 21.69 Bridgeport Av End Barker . AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 _ 51446.00 21.69 $605,519.42 I. 1703 22 Best Rd 24th - 32nd AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 58428.04 22 $687,698.03 • 1960 22.94 33rdAv Pierce • Woodward AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 41018.00 22.94 $482,781.86 300 29.63 M,ansfieldAv End Eastern ACRecanstructlon-Local 2 41543.36 29.63 $483,555.35 1923 23.61 Balfour Rd Sprague Main• .. AC-ReconstructIon-Local 2 21237.12 23.61 $249960.90 550 24.02 KlernanAv End Sullivan ' ' AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 43423.60 24.02 $511,095.77 1599 24.14 CankllnCt 22nd End • AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 7600.00 24.14 $89,452.40 1915 24.19 Dollar Rd Trent Utah AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 38698.20 24.19 $455,477.81 1595 24.56 22nd AY ` Vera Crest Conklin AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 47247.12 24.56 5556,093.60 1233 25.81 6thAv Farr Woodruff AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 25962.00 25.81 $305,572.74 863 26.07 Dyer Rd Sprague End-. - AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 7860.80 26.07 552,521.62 865 26.07 ValleywayAv Park Ella - AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 40329.60 26.07 $474,679.33 305 26.18 Dickey Rd Trent - Knox - - AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 16964.64 26.18 $199,673.81 380 27.72 University Rd End Montgomery AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 17464.60 2732 $205,558.34 1601 27.93 Conklin Rd Vera Crest 23rd AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 68715.60 27.93 $803,782.61 1934 28.99 BuckeyeAv Barker End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 68403.40 28.99 $805,103.02 1114 29.09 Elizabeth St 8th End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 8845.00 29.09 $104,105.65 Total $10,722,274.62 24 sv 2011 pmp 1.23.12 RECOMMENDATIONS The City's road network is one of its greatest assets. The current overall road condition is "very good', at the current funding levels the network will fall into the "fair" range within the next 4-5 years. The impact of which will result in future projects that will cost the City 4 — 10 times more than they would have if the road was maintained regularly. (Refer to Figure 1). The Arterial and collector roads need an annual funding level of approximately $6,000,000 to maintain a very good pavement condition. The Local Access (residential) roads represent approximately 85% of the City's road system. The maintenance budget for the Local Access (residential) streets needs to be increased to approximately $3,000,000 annually including funds allocated for overlays of those roads that are beyond maintenance. t kt I f 1 4 1. IP t. 1 1 A list of the proposed Arterial and Local Access ('residential) street projects for the next six years is provided in the Appendix. Table 7 summarizes the recommended street budget program to meet,long-term maintenance needs of your facilities. Table 7 Recommended Annual Average Budget Local Access Arterials & (residential) Collectors Roads Preventive $ 175,000 $500,000 Mill and Overlay $5,825,000 $2,500,000 Total $6,000,000 $3,000,000 Reconstruction $2,500,000 $1,787,000 25 sv 2011 pmp 1-23-12 Appendix 1. Automated Pavement Inspections Methodology 2. Project Evaluation Recommendations 3. Deterioration of Road Segments 4. Comparison of Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and Overall Condition Index (OCI) 5. Arterial Projects 6. Local Access (residential) Projects Automated Pavement Inspections Methodology Automated Pavement Inspections Methodology For the Spokane Valley project, IMS used their Laser Road Surface Tester (RST) i .� , ;,‘ - enhanced with digital imagery and t-` �/ I GPS capabilities. The RST, with IA , ,� !1 ► its 11 laser sensors collected a full � .•` xy�' f`' array of pavement condition data t,Zt. °4- A ._I I ��011 1 - inn . j I .I I �e complete with high accuracy GPS ' j' r!_ , . t_ _ ;.' ,, coordinates and forward view -- --- ---- - - °--°--R-- -- - digital images for both rigid and flexible pavements (in real time), as it traversed the roadway, An integrated Digital Condition Rating Subsystem supplements the RST data for additional distress data elements, quality assurance and inventory information, Specialized data processing, using GIS as its backbone, allows the pavement data to be quickly checked for completeness and quality. The main components of the Laser RST are: • A transducer bar with an array of 11 laser cameras, rate gyroscopes, inclinometers and accelerometers to measure pavement roughness, rutting, and cracking. • Digital Condition Rating Subsystem that was customized to collect a variety of roadway attributes and extent-severity based pavement distresses through trained operator input. • Ability to collect dual wheel path roughness to International Roughness Index (I RI) standards. • A single forward facing camera was mounted for IMS QA/QC procedures. The images can be provided for digital viewing purposes. • High accuracy Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver with inertial navigation for geo-locating of pavement and asset information with excellent accuracy. • Dual distance measuring instruments to measure linear distances to within +/- 0.5%, The distress data was collected continuously and then reported in 100 foot intervals, complete with their respective GPS coordinates. The data was then aggregated to the section level, following the sectioning and referencing methodology contained in the existing Spokane Valley Cartegraph database. Laser Camera Array The laser camera array collects automated pavement condition data in the form of roughness to International Roughness Index (IRI) standards, wheel path rutting, transverse • ( , cracking, block cracking, alligator cracking and Ar texture. The technology driving the laser-camera \ Tif e. 1�;;, / array removes the subjective nature of pavement .. — condition data collection. The pavement condition data was processed to provide extent-severity distress ratings that were loaded into Cartegraph. The data was collected in accordance with the U.S, Army Corps of Engineers protocols commonly referred to as ASTM D6433-09. Digital Collection/Rating System (DCRS) The Digital Collection Rating System is a touch screen , e , � , __� based tablet computer that allows the user to define what r r'ill -;. information (distresses & attributes) is to be collected and __ A.L-- - ii how it is to be quantified, The DCRS is integrated into the ,'.r, l- k data flow through time code, GPS, distance, and inventory ,\'' �' control, In the context of this survey, the DCRS was configured to be used as a data collection and checking device. Distress data was collected continuously, while inventory and attribute data was checked as the survey proceeded. Survey events (such as detours or obstructions) and inventory related items were collected and noted in the data. RST operators note the surveyed lane and direction on a section-by-section basis. Automated Pavement Inspection Adjustments/Calibration One aspect of the Automated Pavement Inspection that warranted a closer look was the "rutting" distress. Initially an observer would measure rutting in the field by visual means. Occasionally, a straightedge was used to measure the depth of rut but due to time constraints a majority of the rutting inspection was just visual. IMS used a rut bar to measure the depth and extents of rutting in a particular road segment. The rut bar uses extremely sensitive lasers to measure rutting as the inspection vehicle travels roadways. The laser measures to the nearest millimeter every 4'±to develop an average every 100 feet. In order to develop a baseline for rutting sensitivity J-U-B and IMS worked together to modify the range at which rutting was recorded by the rut bar. The original rutting scale from 6 mm to 25 mm was as follows: 6 — 13 millimeters low severity rutting (approximately 1/a"— 1/2") 13 —25 millimeters moderate severity rutting (approximately Y2' 61") 25 millimeters high severity rutting (greater than 1") The baseline rutting scale shown above is based on ASTM D6433. However, the inspection procedures used for past pavement inspections where based on the Northwest Pavement Management Association's Pavement Surface Conditions Field Rating Manual for Asphalt Pavements, current edition. The discrepancy between the inspection methods leads to large discrepancies in the OCI. For example, in a typical road segment that is 2,640 feet long the IMS inspection would yield 660 data points where as the manual pavement inspection method would yield 2 points at best. Typically, the manual pavement inspection would yield a data point mid segment at a location most representative of the entire segment. Using the above scale the inspection by IMS using the rut bar is so accurate that any and all pavement anomalies would be interpreted as rutting which in turn translated in to a very low OCI for the actual age and condition of the roadway. J-U.B selected six roads to manually inspect this year (2011) in order to compare the overall inspection results as well as to more properly calibrate the rutting scale. Upon careful consideration and coordination with IMS, the rutting scale was adjusted to 10 mm to 25 mm as follows: 10 — 15 millimeters low severity rutting 15 — 25 millimeters moderate severity rutting 25 millimeters high severity rutting The adjustment was made to reduce the occurrence of anomalies being interpreted as rutting but at the same time retain the accuracy and consistency of the rut bar technology. With fewer occurrences of rutting throughout the road network, the OCI became more in line with the six manual test inspections (2011) and the 2008 manual road inspections. Project Evaluation Recommendations Project Evaluation Recommendations The following recommendations should be used during the street preservation project evaluation process, for both Maintenance and Rehabilitation projects as well as capital projects, just prior to the Pavement Design Phase. All prospective Arterials/Collectors planned for an overlay, mill and overlay or reconstruction should be cored to a minimum depth of 6-inches below existing subgrade. The advantages of taking cores prior to the pavement design are as follows: > Determine if there is moisture in the base and sub-base course A If the road had been previously overlaid, look for delamination A Determine if a Performance Grade (PG) adjustment is necessary in the mix design, Le. PG 64-28 vs, PG 70-28, A Verify assumptions generally used for a pavement design The following recommendations may be considered during the construction process as a supplement to the WSDOT Standard Specifications: A Verify moisture and compaction requirements through increased testing (2008 Pavement Management Plan Update) > Enhanced joint density testing (2008 Pavement Management Plan Update) Enforce proper timing on asphalt delivery. Do not allow trucks to stack up waiting to be dumped. ➢ Diligent monitoring of asphalt temperature. Deterioration of Road &&gni nt Deterioration of Road Segments The following section highlights 3 principle Arterial road segments and how each road has deteriorated over the past 3 years. The 3 road segments include: 2008 OCI 2010 OCI Route Route Back Route Ahead (Average) {Average} Sprague Havana to Fancher 67.5 55.6 Sprague Evergreen to Sullivan 31.5 24.3 Appleway Dishman4Mica to University 59.4 51.0 In 2008 the segment of Sprague from Evergreen to Sullivan would have been a borderline candidate for a mill and overlay. The OCI threshold for a mill and overlay is OCI 3060, an OCI below 30 calls for a complete reconstruction. Had this section of Sprague been overlaid in 2008 the cost would have been approximately $2.7 million dollars. Moving forward as recommended in the current 2010 update would require a complete reconstruction with a cost of approximately $3.8 million dollars. The segments of Sprague from Havana to Fancher and Appleway from Dishman-Mica to University are currently great candidates for a mill and overlay because of the existing pavement condition. The 2011 update recommends Sprague from Havana to Carnahan be overlaid in 2014 and Sprague from Carnahan to Fancher be overlaid in 2013. Appleway from Dishmanw Mica to Farr is recommended to be overlaid in 2014 and Appleway from Farr to University is recommended to be overlaid in 2012. Should no treatment be completed on these road segments, they will fall into the reconstruction range within the next 7 years. The currently recommended overlays costing $700k $8001( would cost well over $3 million per project if no treatments are done. In the interim between now and the time it would take to complete an overlay, the City may want to consider the following preventative maintenance: ® Crack seal © Seal coat (GSB88 or similar) © One lane grind and overlay o Patching • Slurry Seal These maintenance measures will buy the city additional time until an overlay can be funded. This section is intended to emphasize the importance of following the PMP. It is recommended that the City increase funding so preventative maintenance is a top priority, followed by overlays, and lastly reconstruction projects. The goal is to maintain the City's roads at a high level OCI and to keep individual segments from falling into more costly treatment categories. This PMP update is especially critical because of the completion of the STEP projects. With the completion of the STEP projects the City will need to maintain hundreds of newly reconstructed roads both now and into the future to keep these roads in great condition. Comparison of Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and Overall Condition Index (OCI) Comparison of Pavement Condition Index (PC1) and Overall Condition Index (OCI) PCI OCI 1. Longitudinal Cracks 1. Longitudinal Cracks 2, Rutting 2. Rutting 3. Patches 3. Patches T l 4. Transverse Cracks 4. Transverse Cracks 5. Alligator Cracking 5, Alligator Cracking 6. Pavement Age 7. Pavement Type/ Structure ti Arterial Projects Local Access (residential) Projects City of Spokane Valley 2011 Overall Condition Index Art Arterials and Collectors City of Spokane Valley 2012 -2017 Preservation Projects Map T 3 a N i'll PA 1 prim pr. PP •I • I MINI MIMI INN NIB I(Can I III 1 �= III 1®4. ®i4....5 i'a 6 EUGIfA V ci c_-Y 1 CO lye £1 :O r r us w9.11111 -3 read ay-Av v, � _ Q February 1,2012 55 —141 • UM �_ a0 o 30 T .Sprague"Av r l =i o1:J ;; I i 11.` 'I 84�, i. Cr -16th'M 130 Sprague Av - r WWI I- 0 32nd Av.) 2012 Treatments Mill&Overlay Reconstruct Legend 2015 Treatments Mill&Overlay Reconstruct Preventative Maintenance - •Preventative Maintenance 2013 Treatments 2016 Treatments Mill&Overlay Mill&Overlay Reconstruct Reconstruct Preventative Maintenance - •Preventative Maintenance 2014 Treatments 2017 Treatments Mill&Overlay r.m.Mill&Overlay Reconstruct Reconstruct •—-Preventative Maintenance - -Preventative Maintenance 2011 Proposed Budget-Arterials and Collectors-Preservation Program City of Spokane Valley 2011 Pavement Management Plan Update Project No Segment ID OCi Route From To Plan Activity Number of Lanes Pavement Area(SF) Improved OCI Plan Cost Suggested Budget" Over/Under Suggested Budget Starrnuuater Upgrades(Y/N) Plan Tear2012 Over lay Prolee= 1 12 35,22 Mis=inn Av Union Pines AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 60023,2$ft 96.9 9142,50.11 2 51 33.56 Broadway AV Grcenacres Barker AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 16333.12 ft 94.53 $38991.53 3 84 3732 Anploway IN Farr University AC-Mill and Overlay Art 4195464.64 ft 92.34 5455.205.84 4 88 32.5 4th An OLshman Mica Farr AC-MI[I&Overlay-Col 2 43145.00 ft 84.13 5107.635-10 5 121 30.13 32nd An University Bowdish AC-Mill and Overlay Art 3 222953.50 ft 94.53 5316,500,73 6 123 40.19 32nd An Pines SR 27 AC-Mill and Overlay Art 3 199725.00 ft 95.75 $475,34550 7 124 40.54 32nd An SR 27 Best AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 79882.30 ft 9336 5190,121.06 E 152 4015 Argonne Rd Knox Montgomery AC•MiII and Overlay Art 651491.70 ft 96.51 9122,550.25 9 153 4054 Argonne Rd Mullah Knox AC-Mill and Overlay Art 632973.72 ft 96.61 573,477.45 10 161 38.47 Oishman Mim Rd 15th 24th AC-Mill and Overlay Art 4 194245.60 ft 95.74 $462.06653 22 162 3519 OLhrean Mlp Rd 24th 32nd AC-Mitl and Overlay Art 5 194752.60 ft 95.74 $463,557.59 12 163 32.04 nishman Mira Rd 32nd Schafer AC-Mill and Overlay Art 5 97953.24 ft 94.53 $233,15251 13 173 38 Farr Rd 5prapue Applewey AC-Mill&Overlay-Col 2 20634.00 ft 84.15 549108.92 14 180 35.47 University Rd Sprague Appleway AC-Mill and Overlay Art 659522.00 it 5336 $14237535 IS 182 35 University Rd 8th 16th AC-Mill and Overlay Art 4 120110.00 ft 94.04 $755.661.80 14 203 35.22 Pines Rd 15th 24th AC-Mill and Overlay Art 290231.00 ft 93.7 62x4,853.73 17 242 31.1 Adams Rd 24th End AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 14578.00 ft 93.7 534 695.66 13 250 _35.77 Barker Rd Eueld Trent AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 105411,24 ft 96.61 $250,878.75 19 251 3027 Barker Rd End Euclid AC-MITI and Overlay Art 2 99971.64 ft 96.03 5237,93250 20 1867 34.30 Puncher Rd Sprague Broadway AC-Mill and Overlay Art 5 185596.00 ft_ 94.53 544I.723.24 - 21 1868 3696 Fancher Rd Broadway Sharp AC-Mill and Overlay Art 4 79404.00 ft 95.75 9188.98152 22 1874 24.42 vista Rd Mission Knox AC-MRI&Overlay-Col 23945936 ft 85.6 593,913.23 23 1878 48.44 Herald Rd Main End AC-Mill&Overlay-Col 29510.00ft 84.18 522,705-20 24 1681 39.07 University Rd Sprague Main AC-Mill and Overly Art 4 35157.00 ft 9234 583,673.66 25 1663 32.75 University Rd 4th 5th AC-MiII and Overlay Art 4 59744.00 ft 94.53 $142190.72 26 1986 34.12 Bowdish 541 11th 24th AC-Mill and Overlay Art 287290.00 ft 9335 $207,750.20 Sub-total 95,48620727 9800.000.00 - Reconstruction Projects: 27 68 23.27 Spra0uc Av Evergreen Adams AC-Recoilsirua-Arterial 7 232911 99.68 93,125,77288 Subtotal 93,325.772.98 $0.00 Maintenance Protect-': Crack Seal and Patching 5175,000.00 S50e.o00.00 Sub-total $175.000.00 5500.000.00 Sub-total Overlay and Preventative 55,663.207.27 Total Overlay Reconstruction end Preventative $5,788.93025 51.300.000.00 ;117,c;",530,25) Tnn City of Spokanc Valley s budget total is$2.3 mlillon dollars.$1,0 mdtion dollars o Ltte$23 mdhon L.spent on PMP re ate d projects such as pothole repairs,patching,single lane overlays arid other Immediate needs as they arise. The highlighted roadways could have been overlayed in 2003,now the recommended treatment is a full reconstruct Thera are 17 consolidated roads in 2608 that are shown as needing a reconstruction.Several of which have been reconstructed or had en 00 adjustment based on the 2020lMS inspection Note:The cost between a mill and overlay and full reconstruction is approximately 6times 2011 Proposed Budget-Arterials and Collectors-Preservation Program City of Spokane valley 2011 Pavement Management Plan Update Project 1 No. ' Segment ID Oa Route From To Plan Activity Number of Lanes Pavement Area(SF) Improved OCI Plan Cost Suggested Budget"* Stormwater Upgrades (Y/IV) Plan Year 2013 - Ovcrlay Projects: 23 37 36.89 Broadway Au Yardley Fancher AC-Mill and Overlay Art 4 98860.00 ft 96.61 $254,070.20 29 41 36.74 Broadway As Park Vista AC-Mill and Overlay Art 4 113692.00 ft 95.45 5292,188.44 30 55 38.53 Sprague Av Carnahan Fancher AC-Mill and Overlay Art 5 15884140 ft 97.26 $408,221.37 32 56 35.83 Sprague Av Fancher Dollar AC-Mill and Overlay Art 5 8723$00 ft 95.73 $224,20166 32 80 38.8 Appleway BI Thlerman Park AC-Mill and Overlay Art 4 153784.58 ft 95.45 $395„226.63 33 1.09 43.19 16th Av Pines Saltesc AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 11133.00 ft 95.09 $28,611.81 34 115 36.1924thAv Pines McDonald AC-Mill&Overlay-Cal 2122968.00ft 86.65 $316,027.76 35 130 57.05 Carnahan Rd 8th End AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 63552.03 ft 97.26 5163,323.64 36 155 39.25 Argonne Rd Broadway Mission AC-Mill and Overlay Art 3 95177.5Zft 96.9 $244,606.23 37 183 38.92 University Rd 16th 24th AC-Mill and Overlay An 5153204.90ft 93.02 9393.734.28 38 209 38.08 Saltese Rd 16th McDonald AC-Mill&Overlay-Col 2 47092.00ft 84.7E 5121,026.44 39 210 36.75 'lake Rd Saltese 24th AC-Mill&Overlay-Col 2 51515.0091 _ 86.65 $137 96.12 40 218 37.45 Sullivan Rd Euclid Trent AC-Mill and Overlay Art 5 174731.00 ft 94.2 $449,058.67 41 219 37.28 Sullivan Rd Indiana Euclid AC-Mill and Overlay Art 6 32571100 ft 95.34 5837.077.27 42 223 38 28 Sullivan Rd Sprague 4th AC-MIFF and Overlay Art 4 77315.16 ft 45.73 $198,699.96 _ 43 238 38.45 Adams Rd 2nd _ 4th AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 23517.0091 93.02 573,545.69 44 239 42.19 Adams Rd Sprague 2nd AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 13755.00ft 91.66 $35,35035 45 1369 38.64 Park Rd Mission Trent AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 71481.96ft 9735 $183,708.64 46 1375 37.25 Broadway Av Argonne Farr AC-Mill and Overlay Art 4 37433_00 ft 95.9 9224,715.66 47 1387 36.67 24th Av University 3owdish AC-MiII&Overlay-Col 2 93092.00 ft 34.95 $239,246.44 - 48 1896 37.47 Evergreen Rd 24th 32nd AC-MiII and Overlay Art. 2 69161.00 ft 95.67 9177,743.77 49 1393 39.24 24th Av Adams Sullivan AC-MiIl&Overlay-Col 2 95342.00ft 36.12 9246,313.94 50 1973 34.64 Park Rd Valleyway Broadway AC-Mitt and Overlay Art 2 94893.0091 95.45 9243,872,44 Sub-total $5,382,972.41 $800,000.00 Reconstmction Protects: 51 69 25.3 Sprague Av Adams Sullivan AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 7 234429 99.58 53,146,037.18 Sub-total $3,146,037.18 50.00 Maintenance Projects: Crack Seal and Patching 9175,000.00 9500,00020 Sub-total $175,000.00 $500,00020 _ Sub-total Ove!ay and Preventative $6,057,972.41 Total Overlay,Reconstruction and Preventative $9304,00959 51,300,000.00 (7404,00939) 1 The City of Spokane Vallgfs budget total IS$2.3 million dollars_$LO million dollars is spent on non PMP related projects and immediate needs. The highlighted roadways could have been overlayed in 2008,now the recommended treatment Is a full reconstruct There are 17 consolidated roads in 2003 that are shown as needing a recanstructicn_Several of which have been reconstructed or had an OCi adjustment based on the 2010 IMS inspection Note:The cost between a mill and overlay and full reconstruction is approximately Grimes Project Number30:two lane westbound re s urfacing project completed In 2011,City may choose to move this project to a later date. 2011 Proposed Budtet-Arterials and Collector-Preservation Program City of Spokane Valley 2011 Pavement Management Plan Update Project No. Segment II) OCI Route From To Plan Activity Number of Lanes Pavement Area(SF) Improved OCl Plan Cost Suggested Budgets* Over/Under Suggested Budget Stormwater Upgrades IYINj Plan Year 2014 Overlay Prole=t=: - 52 26 36.73 Mission AV Park Vista AC-Mill&Overlay-Col 2 64083.005 37.64 51.77,509.91 53 45 37.43 BroadwayAv Bowdlsh Pines AC-Mill and Overlay Art 4117228.00 ft 96.32 5324,72156 54 50 34.63 BraadwayAv Sullivan Conklin AC-24 III and Overlay Art 2 62429.00 ft 92.68 $172,928.33 55 54 37.4 Sprague Av End Carnahan AC-MITI and Overlay Art 5158080.005 97.26 5437,881,60 56 57 35.67 Sprague Av Dollar Thierman AC-Mill and Overlay Art 5 44799.005 95.36 $124,090.46 57 63 35.01 Sprague AV Herald University AC-Mill and Overlay Art 5135081.00ft 91.84 _ 5374,174.37 58 83 34.73 Appleway3l Dlshman Mlo Farr AC-Mill and Overlay Art 4 94627.585 91.96 5262,11840 59 90 32.3 4th Av Pine= McDonald AC-Mill&Overlay-Col 235667.00ft 33.79 $237.29759 60 91 34.27 4th Av McDonald Everrrecrs AC-Mill&Overlay-Col _ 2 _ 35339.00ft 3457 5236,389.03 61 114 36,52 24th An Bowdish Pines _ AC-Mill&Overlay-Cal 2 93259.005 87.64 $25932743 62 118 57.24 24th Av Evergreen Barmen AC-Mill&Overlay-Col 2 23231005 86.12 $64,48837 63 119 33.96 24th Av earnnen Adams AC-mill&Over lay-Col 2 80401.005 96.12 $222960.07 64 122 35.46 32nd Av Bowdlsh Pines AC-Mill and Overlay Art 3 133222505 96,61 5369,026.33 65 129 3°.51 Thorpe Rd Dishman Mica MADISON AC-MIII&Overlay-Col 231233.00ft 99.25 586,15.41 66 144 39.99 Park Rd $oraOue Apvkwav AC-Mill and Overlay Art 4 74061.00ft 96.61 $66,643.97 67 156 35.63 Argonne Rd Sprague Broadway AC-Mill and Overlay Art 305186.165 96.61 5263,665.66 68 174 35.56 Mullen Rd Dlshrnan Mira Broadway AC-MIII and overlay Art 3 95419.08 h 9641 5264,310.95 69 134 34.76 University Rd 24th 32nd AC-MIII and Overlay Art 5153044,005 94.53 $423,931.88 70 185 32.31 University Rd 32nd D[shman Mica AC-Mill and Overlay Art 5 67172.00 ft 9268 $186,06644 71 207 37.55 McDonald Rd 16th Saltese _ AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 33326.00 ft 92 $93.693.02 72 231 35.07 Eventrnen Rd Sprague Mission Connection AC-Mill and Overlay Art 5342491.015 95.32 $948,70259 73 235 34.24 Evergreen Rd 16th 24th AC-MIII and Overlay Art 2 79380.00 h 94.04 $219,382.60 74 1885 3652 Bowdish Rd Sth 16th AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 69786.00 ft 95.74 $193,307.22 Sub-total 56.008,643.09 5800,000.00 Reconstruction Preieetrr 75 11 21.42 Euclid Av Barker End AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 52665 99.68 5706,769.67 76 IO 27 Eudid!An Flora Barker AC-Reconstruct-AI-renal 2 '+74490 273 $1,790,53.40 Subtotal $2,503305.07 $0.00 Maintenance Proles : - CrackSealandPatching 5175,000.00 5500,00044 Sub-total 5175,000.00 5500,000.00 Sub-total Overlay and Preventative 56,183,643.09 Total Overlay Reconstruction and Preventative $3,636,948.16 $1.300,000.00 I$7.326$43361 1 l'he Gty of Spokane Valleys budget total ss 523 million detlar_$2.0 million dollar is spent on non PMP related projects and immediate needs. The highlighted roadways could have been overlayed in 2008,now the recommended treatment is a full reconstruct The highlighted roadways could have been overlayed n 2011,now the recommended treatment is a full reconstruct There are 17 consolidated roads in 2008 that are shown as need in: reconstruction.Several afwhleh have been reconstructed or had an DO adjustment based on the 2010 IMS inspection Nete:The cost between a mill and overlay and full reconstruction is approximately 6 times Project Number55:tiro lane westbound re surfacln6 protect completed In 2011,City may choose to move this project to a later date. 2011 Proposed Budget-Arterials and Collectors-Preservation Program City of Spokane Valley 2011 Pavement Management Plan Update Project No. Segment ID OCI Route From To Plan Activity Number of Lanes Pavement Area(SF) Improved OCI Plan Cost Suggested Budget"* Over/Under Suggested Budget Stormwater Upgrades{Y/N} _ PlanYear2015 Overlay Prole= 77 _5 3396 Wellesley Av Sullivan Flora AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2105651.60 ft 96.06 $316,954.80 73 25 33.63 Mission Av Argonne herald AC-Mill and OVerlay Art 2145817.76 ft 96.32 5437,453,23 79 43 33.32 BroadwayAv Farr Steroid AC-Mill and Overlay Art 453323.000 96.32 $174969.00 80 44 33,86 BroadwayAv University 9owdish _ AC-Mill and Overlay Art 4216737.00'0 9603 5350,211.00 81 53 34.3 Sprague AV Thierman Park _ AC-Mill and Overlay Art 5 203539.000 94,8 5610,767.00 _ 82 61 33.2.4 Sprague AV Argonne Farr AC-Mill and Overlay Art 5135114.600 91.5 8405,342.00 33 62 33.32 Spraruewv Farr Pterald AC-Mill and Overlay Art 5 90216,000 91,5 $270,640.00 84 93 34.2 Sth AV Carnahan Dickey AC-Mill and Overlay Art 255667.000 97-19 $197,00100 85 96 32.86 8th Av Dishman Mica Farr AC-Mill and Overlay Art 234694.00 ft 42 $184,682.00 86 99 34.75 8th Au University Bowdish AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 9020100 ft 95.45 5270,843.00 87 110 33,96 16th AV Saltose McDonald AC-Mill and Overlay Art 210266L00ft 4166 $307,983.00 88 115 33.76 24th Ay_ McDonald Blake AC-Mill&Overlay-Col _ 245371.000 85.73 5,37,613.00 89 120 35 32nd Av _ Dishman Mica University AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 19551,00 ft 9234 559653.00 90 139 35.02 Thierman St 4th 8th AC-Mill and Overlay Art_ 2 47311.00 ft 96.32 $143,433.00 91 157 36.98 Argonne Rd Sprague Appleway AC-Mill and Overlay Art _ 353221.25 ft 97.19 599,663.75 92 166 34,43 Dishman Mica Rd Sands Thorpe AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 109344.00 ft 95.74 5323,052.00 93 169 33.38 Malian Rd Broadway Mission AC-Mill and Overlay Art 3 95223,60ft 96,32 5285,670.00 94 190 35.27 Bowdish Rd Sprague 4th AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 53235.00ft 94.04 $159.705.00 95 193 33.76 Bowdish Rd Dishman Mica Sands AC-Mill&Overlay-Cal 2 20349.00 0 87.96 561.047.00 96 221 32.49 Sullivan Rd _ Broadway Mission AC-Mill and Overlay Art 702106.000 94.3 5246.55E30 97 257 35.47 Fancher Frontage Rd Sharp Railroad AC-Mill&Overlay-Col 2 17964.00ft 34.13 $53,892.00 98 1875 3431 8roadway AV Herald University AC-Mill and Overlay Art 4 07490.000 95.74 5262.494.00 99 7870 36.54 Herold Rd Sprague Main AC-MO Ea Overlay-Col 2 17239.00 ft 83.01 551717.00 100 1338 33.79 Bowdish Rd 32nd 37th AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 51016.00 ft 55.74 $153,04800 101 1890 36.65 8th Ay Pines Vender AC-Mill and Overlay Art 240297,000 9189 5120,891.00 102 1897 35.07 Adams Rd 16th 24th AC-Mill and Overlay Aft 2 79712.000 92.68 $239,136.00 103 1911 33.25 Mirabeau Pk Indiana Mansfield AC-Mill&Overlay-Col 546679.96 ft 37.96 $140,039.88 Subtptat 55,987,847.51 5800,000.00 - RceOnaovctten Projects. - 104 9 21.42 Euclid Av End Sullivan AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 33434 59.68 5515,790,72 105 206 2206 Madison Rd 40th MADISON AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 157561 99.68 51,443.74131 106 .>245. •:=16 Flora Od Euclid Trent AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 94853 2796 $1.261.53326' Sub-total $3,223,065.29 $0.00 Maintenance Projee= Crack Seal and PatchIng $175,000.03 5500,000.00 Sub-total 5175,000.00 5500,000.00 - Sub-total Overlay and Preventative 56,16294751 Total Overlay Reconneuc60n and Preventative 59,385,912.80 51,300,000.00 (38335,912-30; -- aneLry or opal®rc valley's aua0estdta7.13 mill an dollars.rsmillion dollars b spent on non PMP related projects and Immediate needs. The highlighted roadways could have been overlayed in 2008,now the recommended treatment isa full reconstruct 7-7 The highlighted roadways could have been overlayed in 2011,now the recommended treatment IIa full reconstruct There are 17 consolidated reeds.in 2038 that are shown as needing a reconstruction-Several of which have been reconstructed or had an Oct adjustment based on the 20101MS inspection Note:The cost between a mill and overlay and full reconstruction is approximately 6times 2011 Proposed Budget-Arterials and Collectors-Preservation Program City of Spokane Valley 2011 Pavement Management Plan Update Project No. Segment ID OCI: Route From To Plan Activity Number of Lanes Pavement Area(SF} Improved OCI Plan Cost Suggested Budget's Over/Under Suggested Budget Stormwater Upgrades(Y/N) Plan Year 2016 Overlay Prof cc= 107 42 32.86 Broadway Av Vista Argonne AC-Mill and Overlay Art 4 116848.00ft 96.61 6375,557.52 108 60 34.04 Sprague AV Vita Argonne AC-Mill and Overlay Art 5 19600720ft 9639 6635,062.68 129 32 3337 Appleway SI Vista Dlshman Miq AC-Mill and Overlay Art 4339373.24 ft 96.03 51,099,571.24 110 37 32.1 4th Av Thierman Park AC-Mill&Overlay-Col 263799.004 86,12. 6222909.76 111 101 82.04 8th Av McDonald Evergreen AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 74692,00 k 92.58 $242,00248 112 117 31.64 24th Av Blake Evergreen AC-MITI&Overlay-Col 2 47835.004 8534 61.54.985.40 113 132 34.33 Fencher Rd Sharp Trent AC-Mill and Overlay Art 4 130504.0051 97.26 $422,83296 114 165 33.67 Dishman Mica Rd 40th Sands AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 79005.00ft 9545 $255,970.20 115 107 3258 Dlshman Mica Rd Thorpe End AC-MITI and Overlay Art 2 57559.0051 95.45 S186,49115 116 177 30.94 Herald Rd 8th 16th AC-Mill&Overlay-Col 2106923.0051 85.34 $346,446.72 117 191 32.06 Bowdlth Rd 6th 6th AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 52445.00ft 93.7 $169,82130 118 200 31.86 McDonald Rd 4th 8th AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 52904.00 ft 92 6171.408.96 119 201 31.17 McDonald Rd 8th 16th AC-MIIIand Overlay Art 2 107332,00ft 91.32 $347,755.68 120 211 34,5 Blaltc Rd 24th SR27 AC-MITI&Overlay-Col 2.31487.0051 55.34 $114,977.88 121 222 31.2 Sullivan Rd Sprague Broadway AC-Mill and Overlay Art 7 246350.00 k 94.24 $795,109.20 122. 1870 33.23 Park Rd Broadway Mission AC-M III and Overlay Art 295296.0051 97.19 $328,726.641 123 1892 3736 McDonald Rd Sprague 14th AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 53517.00ft 92 $172,747.08 Subtotal $6,02851198 $800,008.09 ReeOnstruction Proles= 124 1902 23.41 Euclid Av Sullivan Marietta AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 145693 99.68 51.955.202.23 125 215 17.15 Proem.Rd Wellesley Crown AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 32240 99.66 5440,98952 126 - ` % 873 'Wild" Atli.,. 8th AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2. 37036- 23.93 $497,02312 Subtotal $2,893,275.92 SLIM Malntenenee Projects_ _ Crack Seal and Patching $175,000.00 $500,00040 Subtotal $175,000.00 $500,000.00 _ Sub-total Overlay and Preventative $6,203,511.96 Total Overlay.Recon:truCtion and Preventative $9,096,727.88 $1,300,000:00 (17750.727.38) The Gty oropakane VaBey's budget total L-$2.3 mdlrondollars.$10 ma'an dollar L-spent on non PMP related projects and immediate needs. The highlighted roadways could have been Werlayod in 2008,now the recommended treatment is a full reconstruct 'The highlighted roadways could have been evedayed in 2011,now the recommended treatment is a full recen:truct There am 17 consolidated roads in 2008 that are shown as needing a reconstruction-Several of which hove been reconstructed or had an 00 adjustment based on the 2010 IMS inspection Note:The cost between a mill and overlay and full reconstruction Is approximately times 2011 Proposed Budget-Arterials and Collectors-Preservation Program Ott'of Spokane Valley 2011 Pavement Management Plan Update Project No. Segment ID OCI Route From To Plan Activity Number of Lanes Pavement Area(SF) Improved OCI Plan Cost Suggested Budget** Over/Under Suggested Budget Stormwater Upgrades(Y/N) Plan Year 2017 Overlay Prolee96 127 18 32.73 Montgomery Or Wilbur Pines AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 93803.40 ft 99.47 5323,329.40 122 19 33.1 Indiana Av Montgomery Mirabeau_ AC-Mill and Overlay Art 5 249422,91ft 96.61 5372.960.19 129 27 31.93 Mission Av Vista Argonne AC-Mill 6.Oveday-Col 2 79224.39 ft 37.96 5777,285,05 130 59 31-53 Sprague Av Park Vista AC-Mill and Overlay Art S 160308.00ft 96.09 $561.078.00 131 70 31.40 Sprague Av Sullivan Conklin AC-Mill and Overlay Art S 137119.00 ft 942 $654,885.00 132 72 32.76 Sprague Av Flora Corbin AC-MEI and Overlay Art 5 1161330.00 ft _ 97.19 $408905.00 133 76 33.11 Sprague Ay Barker Hodges AC-Mill&Overlay-Col 2 53060.03 ft 89.57 $135,710.00 134 135 32.69 ThIermart Rd 3roadway Mission AC-Mill&Overlay-Col 25432.00 ft 90.12 5299,033.00 135 199 33.21 McDonald Rd Sprague _ Broadway AC-Mill and Overlay Art .1 127632.00 ft 96.61 $446,712.00 136 204 315 Pines Rd 24th 32nd AC-Mill and Overlay Art _ 2 90343.00 ft 95.74 $316,20050 137 217 33.17 Sullivan Rd 6Off Wellesley AC-Mill and Overlay Art 477219.00ft 97.26 5270,25650 133 227 33.29 Sullivan Rd 24th End AC-Mill and Overlay Art 3 2025030* 95.78 $70576.05 . 139 228 30.43 Evergreen Rd 190 W290 OFF Indiana AC-Mill and Overlay Art _ 67317630 ft 91.66 5256,118.80 140 244 31.72 Flora Rd Trent Wellesley AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 32135,76 ft 53.09 51112,475.19 141 1564 33.93 4th Av End Custer AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 18797.00ft 55,37 565,759.50 142 1877 33,06 I4erald Rd End Broadway AC-Mill&Overlay-Col 244952.00ft 17,24 $157332,00 143 1882 32.5 4th Av University Rowdlsh AC-Mill&Overlay-Cal 23436100 ft 86.65 5297,013SO 144 1234 31.7 4th Ay Bowdish Pines AC-Mill&Overlay-Col 2 34925.00 ft 35.34 5297,447.50 Sub-towl 55,578,437.15 $800,000.00 ReconraSmacdon Froject: 145 1903 29.21 Euclid Av Marietta Fora AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 99322 99.69 51332,902.31 146 246 25.03 flora Rd Euclid Euclid AC-Reconstruct•Arterial 2 18240 99.68 $244,780.30 147 1906 24.73 Sullivan Rd Wellesley End AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 29172 99.68 $391,500.05 148 - --72C :- G9fltTRd • Ap11644/y - 4 .' - AC-Reconstruct- 2 16803 29:63 52'15,496.26 Sub-total 52-194,679.42 $0,00 Maintenance Project: Crack Seal and Patching 5175,000,00 5500,000.00 Subtotal 5175,000.00 5500,000.00 Sub-total Overlay and Preventative 56.053.437.15 Total Overlay Recenstnactlon and Preventative 53.248,11657 51,300,000.00 {$6,942,116.57; 0. The City of enninne Vall bud I'en3 IB' d 0a 0 'I' • cys �.. .s m van o r_$I, rn,lion daliarsofthe$23 million rsspenton PMP related projects Such as pothole repairs,patchmg,single lane overlays and other Immediate needs as they arise. The highlighted roadways could have been overlayed In 2003,now the recommended treatment is a full reconstruct The highlighted roadways could have been overlayed in 2011,now the recommended treatment is a full reconstruct There are 17 consolidated roads in 2008 that are shown as needing a reconstruction.Several of which have been reconstructed or had an OCl adjustment based on the 201011v15 inspection Note:The cost between a mill and overlay and full reconstruction ls approximately 6 times. 2011 Proposed Dodger-Arterials and Collectors-Preservation Program Cityof Spokane Valley 2011 Pavement Management Plan Update Project No. Segment ID DCt Route From To Plan Activity Number of lanes Pavement Area(SF} Improved QC Plan Cost Suggested Budget"' Over/Under Suggested Budget Stormwoter Upgrades(Y/N} Plan Year Remnsbactlan Pro 0 27 63 2317 Sprague Ao Evergreen Adams AC-necon:t wet-Arterial 7 232929 99.60 53,125,772.98 — 51 69 253 Spranue Au Adams Sullivan AC•Rrconutcan-Arterial 7 734421 3200 53.146,037.20 75 21 22-42 Eudld6o Darker End AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 52605 99.08 5700.769,07 76. t0 2].3 E0CIId Av Flora narker _ AC-Reconstruct-Arrerral_ 2 133370 77.3 •7,7 ,515.40 304 9 2L47 Euclid AV End Sullivan AC-Reconstruct-Arsenal 2 _ 30434 99.68 5515.790.72 200 20G 22.06 Madison Rd 40th MADISON AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 207581 99.68 53.443.74L31 200 245 27.90 Porn Rd gudld Trent AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 94153 27.96 $1.263,533'26 124 1702 28_41 Euclid An Sullivan Made= AC-lieu instrucc-Arterlat 2 _ 245693 99.G8 52.955,203.28 125 215 17.15 Prof MRd Wellesley Crown AC-S onnns3.Arterial 2 32800 91.08 $440,58952 120 175 2e-93 r rr Rd 4th 0th AC-Retomtr175-Arterial 2 37035 78.93 5497,073.77 145 1903 29.21 Eudld Au Manettr Flora AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 99322 99.68 52,332,902.31 146 246 25.03 Flora Rd cuuld [odd _ AC-Reconstruct-Areenal 2 11240 99.08 $244,780.80 147 1906 24.73 Sullivan Rd Wellesley End AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 29172 99.00 5391500.05 148 174 29.17t^Tarr Rd Appleway 4th -4 &C-Rc0on:truur-Artedal 2 10893 73.03 5775,496.16 Sub-total 517.006,075.00 The(Ay of Spokane Valley's budget total is 523 millon dollars.$2.0 million dollars of the$23 millon is spent on PMP related projects such as pothole repairs,patching,single lane overlays and other immediate needs as they arise, The highlighted roadway:.Could hove been overlayed In 2008,now Thu recommended treatment Is a full reconstruct IThe highlighted ecodwoys could have been overlayed In 2012,now the recommended treatment Is a fun rernnstuct There are 17 consuGdated roads M 2006 that areahown 4s noodint a reconstruction.Several of which have been reconstructed or had an 00 adjustment based on the 2010 IMS inspection Note:The cost between a mill and overlay and full reconstruction Is apprcnlmately6tlme•- City of Spokane Valley 2011 Overall Conc llllio n index Local Stre&&s t 4_11 I I - .'l -.a i..... • 1 : CC--� i t -r. beeembe1(17 2011 Legend Overall Condition Cnrlex 1-36(Failed) •- 31-60(Medium t`o Poor) •�-^—�61-100(Good) Nota:Network Ott!sit/ • Local Streets City &Spokane Valley 2012-2017 Preservation Projects Map De6ernbei-7•,,2011 :t• I .1 E..1.7. •,_,._ .:.',6.fall I I,, I.. . I f: , 1 19, , 1 I 114' i;;-11.---- , 105 -T---Fs'i 1 i -1". ''' .,, 1 ,-,4,..._-_.:,.. ,IL 'r- ; 11,,-1:1:; ---4-1— -1-.1-4EVIiii,I::::Jr_:i.) •,' 4-1-q 1.-.7.,Li q;-: i: ,I=J ".,_i.t 4 -1 , . 1 „.•i 4 - , , 1 , .» . , • ,_;._._. .I._ 3-- rt-J.ii„..,:; ...., '41., •1 ,1_,, ,,•'''•J'I'I I ,-,• .„, •i P41... , •,.. ••',-11-•I. -1"1- -,'-I ' na.,,, _. r ' L-r11.:. 'li,..•-,"';`„, .' \' 1'\17''fr-11 1•••:''''..,—.. 114 , --nn' 1-I■1•,-1-, 1-71,:i'•■ ...; • I..-i • I ' L-'-.1('"Cl"":::...., 71-_-Elv,' -.f- - Legend 2012 tre4tmenis 2016 Treo1rnents Lear6616v •Ilecerpbe6 .0 or g.consloat Powla.Olatafiiiares -•WaYantolly. 2013 Treatnicnis 2016 Treatments LecolOwnlay tfic■novelm, - - lisconebutt ••-• Pinto.MASDniaki ^ •Porentelke rodorecco. 2014 Trdotrnents 2017 Treatroehtt winrov.1.1 L114..r661 13.1.MM. Omvenwt•DliHnl....m. Notte:ProVentathro Inionance Includoo Crock Strallng, Full Copth PalchIng.Shouldcr FIll find Tic-grading,cod Grading. 2011 Proposed Bertet-Loral Access(Residential)Roads-Preservation Procnm Uty of Spokane valley 2011 Pavement Management plan Update Project No. Segment ID OCI Route From To Plan Activity Number of Lanes Pavement Area(SF) Improved OCI Plan Cost Suggested Budget" Over/Under Suggested Budget Stormwater Upgrades(Y/151) Plan Year2012 Overtly Prato= _ - - 1 1600 30.11 Carmine Ct 22nd End AC-AC Loot Overby 223400.00 ft' 90.18 546.566.00 2 1723 30.16 34th Av Pierce Rowdish AC-AC Local Overlay 253329,00 ft` 90.18 5105,726,71 3 1097 30.78 Kahuna Or End Carnahan AC-AC Local Overlay 235763,00 ft' 87.10 571.16837 4 598 30.31 Marlin Or Buckeye McMillan AC-AC LOca1 Overlay 256540.130tt' 9028 5112516.19 5 369 31.03 knocAV Argonne End AC-AC Loos Overlay 214112.80 ft' 94.19 526,084.47 5 1708 3135 Cameron Ct End Sonora AC-AC local Overlay 2 15452.883(' 00.18 530,310.93 7 I345 3137 13th An Houk End AC-AC Local Overlay 2 9350.40 ft' 8933 $13,607.30 8 397 31.4 Robin 3d End Marietta AC-AC Local Overlay 2 35725.209' 93.84 52134315 9 559 3143 Beige Rd 6ddgcoort Courtiand AC-AC Local Overlay 213940.64 ft" 90.13 527.74127. 10 1067 3156 Willamette St 301 End AC-AC Local Overlay 221979.00 re 91.24 543.730.21 11 600 3157 Mon cornea•Or Drummond Marietta AC-AC Loaf Overlay 2 83807.60 ft' 90.10 5166,777.12 12 861 31.72 Riverside Av 140361nron Argonne AC-AC Local Overlay 2 10795.34 ft. 89.27 521,482.73 13 1176 31352nd Av !Best Adams AC-AC Local Overlay 244676.20 ft' 88.97 533805.74 14 1917 3138 Oyer Rd Broadway Sharp AC-AC Lool overlay 2 538234E0 90.59 5107202.75 15 428 3256 Mansfield AV Pines. Houk AC-AC Local Overlay 237994 .40 St' 91.76 675,908.86 16 1494 32.59 Guthrie Or 19th 25th AC-AC Local Overlay 2 12393850 ft' 9045 5246,037.62 17 1602 3244 Rtdgemont Dr Vera Crest Conklin AC-AC Local Overlay 244004.60 ft' 90,15 537,56935 18 724 32.68 eowdish Rd Mission End AC-AC Local Overlay 25649.50 ft' 9449 511,242.51 19 950 33.12 Clinton Rd SproEuc Main AC-AC Local Overlay 226583.60 ft' 38.97 552.90130 20 773 33.13 Maxwell AV Oberlin University AC-AC LOO/Overlay 217505.20 ft. 94.49 534.535.35 - 21 1752 3323 Fox Ct _ End 35th AC-ACLool Overlay 2 7493.001(' 86.97 514,85137 22 345 33.22 Center Rd Baldwin Indiana AC-AC Local OverL.y 27292.00 ft' 9332 514512.03 23 1598 335 23rd Cl Vera Crest End AC-ACLetsl Overlay 2 5400.00 ft' 58.97 510,746.03 24 599 33.66 Jackson Or Barker Montgomery AC-AC Local Overlay 2 40289.20 ft' 90.11 580.175.51 25 323 3392 Railroad Av Edgerton Ely AC-AC Local Overlay 2 2147436ft' 9332 542,733.98 26 1616 3427 28th AV Virginia Guthrie AC.AC Local Overlay 2 66811.80 ft' 9018 5132,96941 27 1789 35 39th AV Driftwood Ridreview AC-AC Loot Overlay 2 13520.00 It' 91.24 52690480 25 556 35.22 Dalton Av Velox Donwood AC-ACLocal Overlay 234501.32 ft' 9018 568,657.63 29 1933 35.1 McKee Rd Eudkl Bridgeport AC-ACLoe:l Overlay 23036640 ft' 91.24 560,429.14 30 1143 35.7 10th Ct Rocky Ridge End AC-AC Local Overlay 25600.00 ft' 91,76 511144.00 31 1647 35.7 29th An vender Guthrie AC-AC Loot Overlay 239986.801(' 9124 5179,073,73 32 1744 35.37 34th Av Oowdish Loreto AC-AC Local Overlay 225371,00 ft' 94.19 550502.22 33 673 35.37 Valleywav AV Eastern Over AC-AC Local Overlay 2 1247392 ft' 90,11 $24,823.10 34 1950 36.04 Pierce Rd 15th 24th AC-AC Local Overlay 2105740.00 ft' 90.18 5210,422.60 35 383 30.11 Woodruff Rd Montcorncry End AC-AC Loot Overlay 222938.64 ft' 94.19 $45.74739 36 728 36.41 Houk St MisSOn End AC-AClool Overlay 2 1650740 ft' 68.67 532,849.73 37 675 36.47 Main Ay rancher End AC-AC local Overby 2 20014.72 ft' 90,13 539.329.29 31 391 365 Montgomery wv Montgomery End AC-AC local Overlay 2 13302.7901' 94.19 536.02449 39 1639 30.73 29th Ct End BoSvar AC-AC/neat Overby 24690.00 ft' _ 90.18 9933320 40 1714 5357 tlmberfane Ct 24th End AC-AC taol(vcrlav 24000.008[' 9440 57960.00 Sob•totsl 52,498,935.47 93.00 Rcconstrvttlon Project;: 41 1953 17.76 Vera Crest Dr End 24th AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 143326.80 17.76 51,686956.44 Sub-toter 91436,95644 50.00 Maintenance Proiect= Crack Seal and Patching 5500,000.00 50,00 _ Sub-total 5500,000.00 Sub-total Overlay and Preventative 5299893547 Total Overlay Reconstruction and Preventative 54,905,E9I91 I mote:Themat between a mill and ove day and full reconstruction Is approximately 9 times 2011 Prepared Budget-Loot Access IResidential)Roads-Preservation Program OtyofspoLtne Valley 71111 Pavement Management Plan Update Project No. Segment HD 00 ROUte From To Plan Activity Number of Lanes Pavement Area(SF) Improved Oct Pran Cost Suggested Budget'. Over/Under Suggested Budget Starmvrater Upgrades(Y/N} Ptah year 2312 Overlay Project,:_ 42 419 32.43 Jacson Av Woodruff End AC-AC Loot Overlay 21705104ft' 93,84 536.559.74 41 1750 33.47 37thav Oowdish Loretto AC-AC LOPIOverbay 2 74969.00 ft' 89.88 5161,10335 44 1075 33.54 27thA Blake Evergreen AC-AC LOOT Overlay 2 13385.60 ft. 91.24 5114.779.04 45 1541 73.57 23rd Av E,ra.-n neiMr AC-AC Coal Overlay 2 1200120 ft' 91.24 537,522.53 4G 1070 34.21 15th Av Stanley Fanchcr AC-AC fool Overlay 2 48136.00 ft` 01.011 1103.494.70 47 1949 34.27 Glenn Rd 36th 24th AC-AGtoOlOverlav 2105602.00 ft` 87.98 5227.216.30 40 877 34,28 nencie Rd Snradre End AC-AC tool Overlay 2 5380.124' 94.49 517.647_75 49 1023 34.40 Glenn Rd 24th 32nd AC-AC Lc.'Overlay 2 04050.001[' 69,88 5181.799.70 50 1223 34.55 3rd End End AC-AC Weal Overlay 2 10400.00 ft' 89.38 522360.00 51 551 34.55 RetchEord St Mild End AC-AC Local Overlay 2 15965.20056 89.68 534325.181 12 1222 3455 Creilio End End AC-AC Weil Overlay 2 10600.001e 89.88 522,790.00 03 637 3455 Sharp Ac railroad Yardley AC-AC tool Overlay 2 14252.844' 09.80 130,643.61 54 1706 34.65 26th Av Protress Newer AC-Retool Overlay 226612.40ft. 9058 557.21660 55 1142 34.76 Rocky Rider Or 16th End AC-AClpcal Overlay 255086.00 ft' 9114 5110.434,90 56 7.748 34.03 35th Ay Rite, Loreto AC-AG LOP'Overlay 234111.00ft' 89.00 573,339.65 57 3.723 35.02 TSmbrrlanc Cr 24th End AC-AC Local Overlay 2 58:41.20 ft' 59.88 5125,219.54 51 517 35.21 Boone AV Pines Verger AC-AC Leal Overlay 2 34726384' 3837 574651.72 59 1722 35.29 33rd Av University Pierce AC-AC Local Oveday 240012.004' 19.00 110337630 60 936 310 OI1v,Av Pine, Collins AC-AC Loral Overlay 216373.004' 3637 536276.95 61 1556 35.43 Enms Rd 2151 Cnd AC-AC Local Overlay 2 29445.35 h' 90.38 543313.57 62 1679 35.81 30th Av A1/0100 Ever5reen AC-ACtool Overlay 2 52560.804' 01.24 5113,005.72 53 11227 3602 1.3iti AV End wardson AC-AC Local Overlay 2 6611.00ft' 91.24 514,713.65 r 64 678 36.25 Eastern Rd Spnngfeld Orn4dway AC-AC Loral Overlay 28374.39 it' 89.08 517,99550 65 1955 36.76 Pierce RD 24th 32nd AC-AC Local Overlay 2 305030.0310' 89.38 572755170 6S 594 36,31 Fairview Ct End Joel AC-AC Local Overlay 231700.00 ft' 19.33 52635600 07 616 16.49 Railroad Ac Howe P.3511on AC-ACWail Overlay 2 21735.213IV 99.90 540.730.85 6e 330 36.55 %nog AV Dick MSta AC-AC Local Overlay 217728.344' 92.8 031315.50 59 1734 36.75 Glenn Cr End 35th AC-AC Lem'Overlay 2 34584.001' 3938 574355.60 70 1773 37.03 401h AV hoorsoN End AC-AC Local Overlay 2 2415735 ft' 90.79 551359.82 71 1231 37.12 tludees Sd Sprague 8th AC-AC fool Overlay 310654514' 94.19 540.107.20 Subtotal 52.276.446.73 50.40 8ecoretrueNon Prnjec05 72 sos 1135 Jackson Cul-De-Sac Or End Jackson AC-Remnermerlon-lool 4660 1I.15 54142 73 928 14.89 Whipple Rd End Main. AC-Recnnstmeelon-LOPI 2 5020.6E 14.09 590863426 74 597 35,05 Marietta Al McMillan Meetcntnery AC-Recons9vctlon-Local 2 25262.4 10.05 7-97330.444 75 1715 10.15onora Dr 24th End AC-lleoonsmoClnn-LOerl 2 20702.05 10,3 337323.4816 76 1594 185 20th Ct Vera Crest End AC-Aecantrruction-LOOT 2 176030 1135 707194577 77 607 20.94 Montgomery Cul-De-5.0r Montgomery End AC-8eennmvctlun-Local 2 3800 20.94 44725 70 1001 215 Atka Ay Darker Mch15an AC-Reconstruction-Loa' 2 38822.16 215 455535.0232 79 604 29.47 MCMSlan Rd Montgomery Buckeye AC-Reconstruction-Loral 2 34139.2 71,47 431018384 Santana 51.059.045.85 50.00 Maintenance Project~ Crank Seal and Patchlnr 5500.050.00 50.00 Sufi-total 5500.00000 Subtotal Overlay and Preventative 52,77E 44677 3 Total Overlay Remnstrtant.nn and Preventathet 54,535,'51258 I I Note:The cost between a m1O and overiayand full reconstruction Is approximately 6 time: 2011 Proposed Rud5et- Aercw Inesidcnliatj Roads-Preservation Pr11 ram City of Spokane-Valley 20II Pavement Manaternnnt Plan Update Project No. Segment ID OCI Route From To Plan Activity Number of Lanes Pavement Area(SF) Improved OCI plan Cost Suggested Budget" Over/Under Suggested Budget Stamm/rater Upgrade;(Y/N) Plan year 2014 OverlayProje= 80 1757 33.47 Sates Rd End 37th AC-AC total Overlay 264513.9054 39.58 5150.315.29 81 17-6 33.0 35th AV Ll i rsitY Pierce AC-AC Lard Overlay 2 49553.00it' 90.8 5115,458.49 82 1270 3329 Mamer Rd 515 7th AC-AC Local Over'a 2 273713011' 8958 553 657.93 53 601 2437 3oeI Rd Suckcve End AC-AC Local Oveday 2 28.99LS2 ft' 90.48 567,350.24 04 1735 34.6 Oils Ct End 33rd AC-AC Local Overlay 2 7381001' 90.48 517.797.73 85 1931 34216th AV Veminr End AC-AC Local Overlay 2 17940.901' 88.97 541,800.20 86 469 34.91 Sroad Av Burns Lucille AC-AC Local Overlay 224701.20 ft' 89.58 557,55300 87 726 35.1 Wilbur Rd Mission End AC-AC Local Overlay 216551.08 ft' 91.84 538,565.41 88 967 35.3 Main Av Rest Adams AC-AC Local Overlay 247236.32 H 0837 $110,060.33 89 1459 3537 21s4 AV Univer0v Skdpworth AC-AC Local Overlay 2 79624,001' 1958 5185.573.92 90 602 35.44 Drummond St Montgomery Marlin AC-AClocal Overlay 237270.40 ft' 99.58 556340.03 91 935 3545 Main An Pines McDonald AC AC Loco[Overlay 263960.431' 80.37 5149,027.92 92 1166 35.52 Foy Rd 5praeuc 1st AC-AC Local Overlay 29027.09 tt' 85.67 $21,032.91 93 595 3560 Grace CI End Joel AC-AC loot Overlay 2 12700.009' 8958 527,261.90 94 1141 35.93 Koren Rd 16th Rocky RIO AC-AC Local Overlay 2 38512991' 90.79 589,73236 95 1256 3G.I Houk Rd 4th End AC-AC Local Overlay 2 26363.90 ft' 88.97 $61.425.79 96 G03 36.22 Idamtony Rd Martin Buckeye AC-AC local Overlay 2 13045.05 ft' 89.5E 543,445.10 97 821 36.23 Houk Rd 5Into Minion AC-AC Local Overlay 2 2723280 rt. 98.07 563,452.42 98 I720 3039 Steen Rd 23rd End AC-AC Loral ovoriay 2 57204.001'' 90.48 5133.255.32 99 336 3634 Elton Rd Shannon Knox AC-AC Local Overlay 210723.2211' 92.28 $24,986.10 100 1446 3529 24th Av End Otohman Mka AC-AC Loral Overlay 2 1043200 ft' 9837 524,30056 101 351 36.9 Indiana Av Hutchinson Argonne AC-AC LOca t Overlay 29285.201' 92-0 521,536.15 102 12E2 37.04 Century Ct Sullivan End AC-ACtocnt Ovcriav 2 14494.009' 9176 533,771.02 103 1924 37.06 Main AV University Skipwort h AC-AC Local Overlay 243154.10 ft' 88.07 5131.574.25 104 696 37.43 Or_met AV Thlennan Smiley AC-AC Local Overlay 2 23882.409' 94.84 555,645.99 105 1927 37.47 1st AV Union Pin= AC-AC Loral Overlay 236310.009' 38.67 555,76739 106 1158 3752 Prorrrss Rel 59rague 4th AC-ACLetll Overlay ' 40155.001[' 51.70 593563.48 107 655 3757 Sharp Av FancherEmrrtaro Thlcrnun AC-AC local Overlay 276034,40 ft' 90.48 5177,260.15 103 1500 37.65 Collins Rd Soltesc Houk AC-AC Local Overlay 219365.651' 93.97 545,12125 109 - 553 37.69 Velnx Rd Dalton Courttand AC-AC Local Overlay 2 36472.68 ft. 3958 5E4,95134 110 1297 37.77 Farr Rd 8th Archery AC-AC Local Overlay _ 2 5851.00 ft' 59.27 313,532.83 111 1662 37.81 Virr alb Rd 291.8 31-2 AC-AC Local Overby 2 40227.60 fe 90.48 593,730.31 112 1655 38.0] Cherry Rd Skvview End AC-AC Local Overlay 2 23210.031Y 90.48 547,091.15 113 012 98.23 MaxwetlAv Pine. Houk AC-AC Local Overlay 2 24135.4554 19,07 556235.57 114 1346 395414th AV Vertler Vireieto AC-AC Local Overby 27207.00 ft' 88.97 516.79231 _ Sub-total 52,499,13334 5020 Reconstruction Project- 115 606 9.04 Montgomery Col De-5 Montgomery End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 4520 9.04 53200.4 11G 554 21.59 Orldtyport Av End Darker AGROconxtmainn-Local _ 2 51.146 21.69 605519.42 117 1703 22 8cst Rd 24th 32nd AC-Reconaructian-Local 2 56428.94 22 567695.0308 115 1960 229433rd AV Pierce Woodward AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 41018 22.94 482733,36 5ub-total 51529,199.71 $0.00 Maintenance Prolecta Crock Seal and POtehinR• 5500,000.30 50.00 _ Soh-total 5500,000.00 Sub-total Overlay and Preventative $2,999.39334 Total Over]ay Recan^Wction and Preventative) $4,020,383.05 Note:The colt hetvreeo a mill and overlay and full fcCOrrotruction i.approximately 6 times • 2011 Proposed Oudget-Local Access(Residential).Roads-Preservation Program City Of Spokane Valley 2011 Pavement Management Plan Update Project No. Segment ID OCI Route From To Plan Activity Number of Lanes Pavement Area(SF) Improved OCI Plan Cost Sutg. tcd Budget"" Over/Under Sug csted Budget Stormweter Upgrade:(Y/N) Plan Year 2015 Overlay Protect;: 119 1304 34_66 13th Ay Herald Unive3ly AC-AC toed Overlay 261289,301' 90.48 5153,035.39 120 1652 34.59 31:140 End Clinton AC-AC total Overlay 297424.80 ft' 90.18 3244536.75 121 1525 34.91 Blake Rel 16th 54110 AC-AC Local Overlay 2 53981.48 ft' 89.58 5135493.51 172 1370 35 Blake Rd 12th 16th AC-AC Local Overlay 2 20760.00(7' 3958 $67,167.60 123 1959 35.01 Pierte St 32nd l 37th AC-ACLacal Overlay 2 43836.00 fta 92.8 5119.028,36 ■ 124 1522 35.15 Keller Rd Saitroe. Sernra AC-AC Local Overlay 2 27265.200. 88,67 563,435.65 125 1597 35.36 23rd Av Conklin Steen AC-AC Local Overlay _ 235184,0933' 91.24 588,311.84 126 1333 35.16 Union Rd 15th 16th AC-AC Loral Overlay 2 12337.00 f. 90.79 530.965.87 127 1054 35.19 1st Av Olshman Mica Willow AC-AC LOwl Overlay 210849.0033' 10.37 $27.230.99 128 1732 35.26 G11175 Rd 34th 35th AC-AC Local Overlay 2 16740.00 Et' 89.27 542017.43 129 1644 35.36 27th Ay 29th Tali Tree AC.AC Local Overlay 2 55273.50 t. 90.18 5738,736.74 130 1749 35.57 35th Ay Hate. Eon AC-AC Local CAT day 2 31995.001 90.16 580.20745 131 1751 35.65 Foe St 35th 37th AC-AC Local Overlay 2 23220.00 R' 9016 558,232.20 132 553 35.71 Courtland Av Vela: Sonwood AC-AC Loral Overlay 2 33317.751' 89.27 535.13358 133 1182 35.81 2nd Av Adam: End AC-AC Local Overlay 213582.004' 85.07 $34.39082 134 1948 35.58 NewerCt 13th End AC-AC Local Overlay 2 29569.001' 91.24 574218.19 135 1758 36.24 Wilbur 3d 32nd 34th AC-AC Local Overlay 2 20246.004' 90.18 550,817.42 133 953 3627 31aim Rd Sprague Vatlnvwav AC-AC Local Overlay 2 42456.644' 5337 S106.566.17 137 947 3033 Main Au End Evergreen AC-AC local Overlay 2 36037.801' 80.07 590454.83 132 1498 36.37 Semm AV Vereler Melenold AC-AC Local Overlay 2 56720.401' 38.67 5142,368.20 139 1920 35.38 Howe lit 14th 10th AC-AC Loral Overlay 2 23150.00 ft' 90.48 $50,10550 140 1344 363913th Ay Wminla Woodlawn AC-AC Local Overlay 23142.0015' _ 18.57 $70436.47 141 814 3659 Slnto AV Pines Houk AC-AC tool Overlay 2 7413335re 27.75 350587.23. 142 1353 33.75 13th Ct Aolon End AC-AC Local OVerlav 2 4735.001' 8958 5118845 143 1307 36.85 Dartmouth Rd 1.3th 16th AC-ACLool Overlay 7 34449,054' 9048 583:46090 144 1571 35.87 Century Ct End 22nd AC-AC Local Overlay 217600.004' 90.10 532 520.00 145 1958 37.02 Van Marter lid 33rd End AC-AC Local pvedav 2 33494.001' 9221 554,069.94 146 555 37.07 UbertyAv Vella: McKee AC.AC Local Overlay 2 24370.92(1. 50.38 561,171.01 I47 687 37.09 Eastern Rd Broadway Mallon AC-AC Local Overlay 2844290 ft' 89.27 821.191.08 148 350 37.15 Oa Rd Mission Nora AC-AC Local Overlay 223654.884' 9176 559373.75 149 969 37.19 ealivar Rd Sprague Main AC-AC Local Overlay 2 32728.00 ft' 0,07 579,537.23 150 1711 37.2 Needham Or TImberlane End AC-AC Local Oreday 2 17825.20 fe 89.27 544,741.25 151 943 3737 Hook Rd Sprague Main AC-AC'Cool OVeday 218844.00 ft' 36.07 547.298,44 Sub-total 52.495.58294 5020 Reconstruction Pn11ec 152 300 29.63 Mansfield Av End eastern AC-Reconstructton-Lord 2 41543.15 29.63 438965.3472 153 1923 23.618o0feur Rd Sprmrue Main AC-Recnn.-trvct7on-Local 2 21237.12 23.61 249960.0024 154 _ 550 24.02'German Av End Sullivan _ AC-Reconstruetten-Local 2 43423.6 24.02 511095.772 155 1599 24.14 Conklin Ct 22nd End AC-Recontruction-Local 2 7600 24,14 19452 150 1915 24.39 OoR5r Rd Trent Utah AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 38698.2 24.19 455477.814 Sub-total $1.79495184 50.00 Maintenance Pruiec0 Crack Seal and Patchln5 5500.000.0 50.00 tub-total $500,000.00 _ Subtotal Overlay arrd Preventative $2,995,589.94 Total Overlay Recpn^vuctlon and Preventative 54,790,54178 Note:The cost between a'roll and overlay and full reeenstructlon Is approximately G time: 2011 Proposed Budget-Local Acc8S(Residential)Roads-Preservation ProCra.m Cry of Spokane VaII59 2031 Pavement Management Plan Update Project No. Segment ID 00 Route From To Plan Activity Number of Lanes Pavement Area(SF) Improved OCI Plan Cost Surested Budget*' Over/Under Suggested Budget Stormwater Upgrades(Y/N) Plan Year 2026 Overlay Projec 157 1765 33.78 40th Av Reeves _ Union AC-AC Loot Overlay 2 25797.00 ft' 88.97 570,167.84 5 158 1074 _34.03 Hanna Yale Rd Yale 16th AC-AC Local Overlay 23073.005' 88,97 521,972.16 5 159 1167 34.27 Roble Rd Spnrvc 1st AC-AC Local Overlay 2 13466.00 R' 88.07 536.62752 5 360 560 34.33 DrmetAV Lake Oyer AC-AC Local Overlay 226236.508' 39.38 571,497.55 5 261 1356 14.34 Vlrpinia St 13th 15th AC-AC Loral Overlay 3 33842.00 R' 38.37 5105,650.24 5 162 1733 3430 40th Av Dishman Min Bowdish AC-AC Local Overlay 2 58281.00 ft' 92.28 5158,324.33 5 163 1574 343326th Av Blake Darts AC-AC Local Overlay 245827.60 ft' 90.18 5124,65107 5 164 1140 34.46 Panther Rd 14th 15th AC-AC Local Overlay 29867.00 R' 89.88 526,83.8.24 5 265 1164 34.52 let Av End Union AC-AC Local Overlay 218864.00 ft' 88.07 551310.01 5 766 1495 34.7 Saltese&Blake Frontan Vcrcler McDonald AC-AC Local Overlay 2 34051.92 ft' 8837 592,62122 5 567 921 34.92 Main A4 Bowdish Wilbur AC-AC Local Overlay_ 21E629.24 ft' 01.07 550,671.53 5 168 1414. 35.05 Newer Hd 34th 16th AC-AC Local Overlay 2 20640.001[' 90.79 556,140.80 5 I69 1171 35.2 3rd Av Pines End AC-AC Local Overlay 222214.00 ft' 8837 560.42203 5 - 170 1300 35.23 Walnut Rd 8th 16th AC-AC Local Overlay 230230.0092 90.10 521325.60 5 171 1501 35.5 Vemler Rd 5altese Forms AC-AC fool Overlay 2 36247.45W 5337 598.57933 5 172 955 _3555 Mayhew Rd Spnrue Riverside AC-AC Local Overlay 2 20710.001[' 87.76 $561331.20 5 173 1434 35.66 21st As Cherry Guthrie AC-AC Local Overlay 2 36514.46 ft' 89.27 59950957 5 174 1502 35.7 W0041awn Rd Salte•.e Forrest AC-AC Local Overlay. 2 4767040 ft' 6637 5129,663.49 5 175 1651 35.71 Houk 5t 24th 25th AC-AC Local Overlay 21495640 h' 39.27 540,68141 5 376 948 35.8 Main Ay McDonald End AC-AC local Overlay 2 24358.40 R' 87.76 567,61485 5 177 697 35.91 Indiana Ct End End AC-AC Local Overlay 233226.56ft' 94.43 590376.24 5 173 294 35.91 Utah Av Eastern Elizabeth AC-AC Local Overlay 235255.00W 89.53 $95.895.73 179 1925 3594 Main Ao Wilbur Pin e; AC-AC Loral Overlay 2 65012E4 88.07 5176,834.33 5 I30 G79 35.96 Oyer Rd Valleyway Broadway AC-AC Loral Overlay 2 48429.92 ft' 89.58 5131.729.33 5 131 .940 36.01 Collins 3d Olive Broadway AC-AC Local Overlay 2 39064405' 8746 5106,250,17 5 182 1663 36,15 WOodlown Rd Skyview 32nd AC-AC Loral Overlay 230230.80 R' 89.38 582227.78 5 I33 1580 36.6 21st Ct End Timhertane AC-AC Local Overlay _ 2 9090.770` 88.97 524,77676 5 184 1802 36.62 Merry Dr Schafer Old Schafer AC-AC Local Overlay 27723.00 ft. 69.88 521,005.56 5. 185 1412 37.22 St Chark5 St End 15th AC-AC Local Overlay _ 212023.00 ft' 90.79 53270251 5 SuGhotal 52399,456.10 50.03 Reconstruction Project. 136 1595 24.56 22nd AV Vest Crest Conklin AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 47247.12 2456 556098,6024 187 1233 26,01 6th 40 Farr Woodruff AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 25962 25.82 30557274 180 863 26.07 Dyer Rd Snnene End AC-ReCOnSnstien-Lool 2 78602 2607 92521516 189 865 26.07 VallcywayA7 Park Ella AC-Reconstruction-LOol 2 40329.6 26.07 474679392 I90 305 76,13 Dickey Rd Trent Knoc AC-reconstruction-Local 2 1696424 26.33 199673.8128 191 380 27.72 University Rd End Montgomery IAC•Reconstruction-Local 2 17464.6 27.72 205558342 Subtotal 51,854,10451 $0.09 Maintenance Project: Crack Se 41 and Patchinr. $500,000.00 $0.00 Subtotal 5500.00000 _ Subtotal Overlay and Preventative 52,899451.16 Total Overlay Reconstruction and Preventative 54,733,560.07 I Note:The cost between a mill and overlay and full reconstruction is approximately 6 times 2011 Proposed Bud40t-Local Access(Residential)Roads-Preservation Protram Cdyd$pokane Valley 2011 Pavement Manalemcnt Plan Update Project No. _ Segment ID OCI Route From To Plan Activity Number of Lanes Pavement Area(SF) Improved OCI Plan Cost Suggelted Budget** Over/Under Suggested Budget Stormwater Upgrades(Y/N) Plan Year 2017 - Overlay prefacer: 192 162.1 32.35 30th Av University Roundish AC-AC Local Overlay 2106430,00 ft' 88.67 5311,839,90 193 1532 33.31 19th Av Rennet Early Dawn AC-AC local Overlay 243424.80 ft. 09.88 5127,234.66 194 3250 33.37 Vercler Rd 7th 8th AC-AC tocal Overay 2 16898.00 ft' 88.07 549,51114 195 1957 33.4 McDonald Rd 27th 31st AC-AC Local Overlay 2 6053330 ttr 8958 5177,362.23 190 1745 33.43 34th Av Melissa Pints AC-AC Local Overlay 236621.00 ft= 89.55 $107,299.$3 197 1413 33.48 Si Charles Rd End 13th AC-AC LoolOverlay 2 47302.00 ft' 90,48 5138,594.16 198 1733 3354 Woodward Rd 34th 34th AC-AC Locat Overlay 2 51860.00 re 91.76 5151.949.30 199 1159 33.63 Broadview Dr End End AC-AC Local Overlay 25504.00 ft. 93.32 514,126.72 ' 200 1643 33.83 26th Al Pines Tall Tree AC-AC Local Overlay 2 99984.000? 95.97 5292.71872 201. 1967 33.91 ProBree Rd 15th 24th AC-AC Local Overlay 269225.78 fe 89.50 520233154 202 907 34.01 Raymond Rd 5pv1ee Valleyway AC-AC Locti Overlay 2 42681.92 ft' 87.76 5121,559.03 203 . 909 34.06 Riverside.AV university End AC-AC tool Overlay 2138393090 87.76 540,579.15 204 1174 34.1 Blake Rd Sprarue 4th AC-AC Local Ovedav - 2 39954.00 fry _ 88.67 5117.065.22 205 1724 34.12 34th Av Glenn 511113 AC-AC Leval Overlay 210900.00 ft' 89.58 531,644.00 205 1491 34.71 Gaits Parkcn 73rd End AC-AC local Overlay 2 5201301 88.97 515.239.81 207 280 34.28 Nina Rd Eucild Liberty AC-ACLocal Overlay 2 21994.201V 88.67 $64.443-01 208 1452 342954ipworth Rd 15th 24th AC-AC Local Overlay 2105764,00 re 88.07 5309888.52 209 1515 34.4 22nd An McDonald Blake AC-AC Local Overlay 2 53855.20 ft' 88.07 9157,795.74 210 1737 34.65 5l6tworth Rd 32nd 33rd AC-AC Local Overlay 2 7800.00 it. 88.67 $22054.00 211 1099 14.97 Bonnen Ct End 31st AC-AC Local Overlay 212443.80 ft' 89.58 536474.98 Soh-canal 52.496.48161 $0.00 Reconstruction P18je890 212 1601 27.91 Cenkhn Rd Vera Crest 23rd AC-Reconstruction-Local .. 65715.6 27.93 308782312 213 1934 28.99 Buckeye Ao Wher End AC-Deconstruction-Local 2 63403.4 29.99 805108.018 224 1114 29.09 Elhaheth 51 3th End AC-Reconstruction-loVI 2 8845 29.09 104105.65 Sub-[Oral $1,717,995.2$ $0.00 Maintenance Ptojeef: Crack-Seal and Patehinit 5500,000.00 50.05 Sub-total 5500.000.00 Sub-total Overlay and Preventative 52,996401.51 :Drat Overlay Reconstruction end Preventive 54,714,477.89 I I Note-,The coat between a mill and overlay and full reconstruction Is approximately 6times 2011 Proposed Budget-Local Access(Residential)Roads-Preservation Program City of Spokane Valley 2011 Pavement Management Plan Update Segment ID OCI Segment ID\Route Segment ID\Route Back Segment 19\Route Ahead Plan Activity Segment ID\Number of Lanes Segment ID\Pavement Area Improved OCI Plan Cost Reconstruction Projects 1 1953 17.76 Vera Crest Dr End 24th AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 143326.80 17.76 $1,686,956.44 605 11.15 Jackson Cul-De-Sac Dr End Jackson AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 4600.00 11.15 $54,142.00 l 928 14.89 Whipple Rd End Main AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 5020.08 14.89 _ $59,085.34 i 597 18.05 Marietta Av McMillan Montgomery AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 25262.40 18.05 $297,333.45 1715 18.1 Sonora Dr 24th End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 28702.08 18.1 $337,823.48 1594 18.5 20th Ct _ Vera Crest End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 17603.60 13.5 $207,194.37 507 20.94 Montgomery Cul-De-Sac Dr Montgomery End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 3800.00 20.94 $44,726.00 1006 21.5 Alki Av Barker Michigan AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 38822.16 21.5 $456,935.82 604 29,47 McMillan Rd Montgomery Buckeye AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 34139.20 29.47 $401,813.33 606 9.04 Montgomery Cul-De-Sac Dr Montgomery End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 4520.00 9.04 $53,200.40 554 21.69 Bridgeport Av End Barker AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 52446.00 21.69 $605,519.42 1703 22 Best Rd 24th 32nd AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 58428.04 22 $687,698.03 1960 2294 33rd Av Pierce Woodward AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 41018.00 22.94 $482,781.86 300 29.63 Mansfield Av End Eastern AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 41543.36 29.63 $488,965.35 1923 23.61 Balfour Rd Sprague Main AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 21237.12 23.61 $249,960.90 550 24.02 Kiernan Av End Sullivan AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 43423.60 24.02 $511,095.77 1599 24.14 Conklin Ct 22nd End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 7600.00 24.14 $89,452.00 1915 24.19 Dollar Rd Trent Utah AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 3869820 24.19 $455,477.81 1595 24.56 22nd Av Vera Crest Conklin AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 47247.12 24,55 $556,098.60 1233 25.81 6th Av Farr Woodruff AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 25962.00 25.81 $305,572.74_ $92,521.62 863 26.07 Dyer Rd Sprague End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 7860.80 26.07 865 26.07 ValleywayAv Park EIIa AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 40329.60 26.07 3474,679.39_ $199,673.31 305 26.18 Dickey Rd Trent Knox AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 15964.64 26.18 380 27.72 University Rd End Montgomery AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 17464.60 27.72 $205,558.34 1601 2733 Conklin Rd Vera Crest 23rd AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 68715.60 27.93 $808,782.61 1934 28.99 Buckeye Av Barker End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 68403.40 28.99 $805,108.02 1114 29.09 Elizabeth St 8th End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 8845.00 29.09 $104,105.65 i Totsl $10,722,274.62 The National Citizen SurveyTM CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY , WA. 2011 Report of Open-ended Question mR r_�} NATIONAL • RESEARCH I C A cetiTER c, 3005 30th Street 777 North Capitol Street NE,Suite 500 Boulder,CO 80301 Washington, DC 20002 www.n-r•c.corn •303-494-7863 www.icrna.org•202-289-ICMA City of Spokane Valley l 2011 • CONTENTS Survey Background 1 About The National Citizen Survey' 1 Understanding the Results 2 About Closed-ended and Open-ended Questions 2 Verbatims 2 Verbatim Responses to Open-ended Questions 3 What one thing do you believe the City can do to make Spokane Valley a better community? 3 Government, community relations, budget/taxation, maintaining services 3 Transportation,traffic flow, street changes, road maintenance, snow plowing 5 Safety, law enforcement 7 Appearance, code enforcement 8 Jobs/economic development 9 Education, services to youth 10 Alternative transportation, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, public transportation 11 Parks/recreation, cultural and community opportunities 12 Planning/managing growth, downtown, city center 12 Don't know, no comment 13 Other 13 C nJ u ei `t) LY. -e] C 0 a: 2 _•7 c'J 7 C ra f The National Citizen SurveyTM City of Spokane Valley I 2011 SURVEY BACKGROUND ABOUT THE NATIONAL. CITIZEN SURVEY' The National Citizen Survey' (The NCS') is a collaborative effort between National Research Center, Inc. (NRC) and the International City/County Management Association (ICMA). The survey and its administration are standardized to assure high quality survey methods and comparable results across The National Citizen Survey' jurisdictions. Participating households are selected at random and the household member who responds is selected without bias. Multiple mailings give each household more than one chance to participate with self-addressed and postage paid envelopes. Results are statistically weighted to reflect the proper demographic composition of the entire community. The National Citizen Survey' customized for this jurisdiction was developed in close cooperation with local jurisdiction staff. The City of Spokane Valley staff selected items from a menu of questions about services and community problems; they defined the jurisdiction boundaries NRC used for sampling; and they provided the appropriate letterhead and signatures for mailings. City of Spokane Valley staff also determined local interest in a variety of add-on options to The National Citizen Survey' Basic Service. t1 C C 1 vi G X n U F:. The National Citizen SurveyTM • 1 City of Spokane Valley I 2011 UNDERSTANDING THE RESULTS ABOUT CLOSED-ENDED AND OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS Questions can either be asked in a closed-ended or open-ended manner. A closed-ended question is one where a set of response options is listed on the survey. Those taking the survey respond to each option listed. Open-ended questions have no answer choices from which respondents select their response. Instead, respondents must "create" their own answers and state them in their own words:The verbatim responses are categorized by topic area using codes. An "other" category is used for responses falling outside the coded categories. In general, a code is assigned when at least 5-10% of responses will fit the code. Advantages of an open-ended question include: Responses are not prompted, allowing respondents to provide answers that are not anticipated or well known. This type of question tends to capture response options that come to mind most quickly. The final result can be richer, since verbatim responses are included in an appendix, giving you and others a chance to "hear" the voice of respondents in their own words. There is a smaller risk of missing important dimensions. VERBATIMS Respondents were asked to record their opinions about Spokane Valley in the following question: What one thing do you believe the City can do to make Spokane Valley a better community? The verbatim responses were categorized by topic area and those topics are reported in the following table with the percent of responses given in each category. Those verbatim responses are grouped by the first topic listed in each comment whenever a respondent mentioned more than a single topic. Verbatim comments that contain more than one topic appear only once (in the category of the first topic listed). Results from the open-ended question are best understood by reviewing the table of frequencies that summarize responses as well as the actual verbatim responses themselves, What one thing do you believe the City can do to make Spokane Valley a better Percent of community? Respondents Government,community relations,budget/taxation,maintaining services 19% Transportation,traffic flow,street changes,road maintenance,snow plowing 12% • Safety, law enforcement 11% r1 Appearance,code enforcement 9% • Jobs/economic development 8% =? Education, services to youth 8°J Alternative transportation,bicycle and pedestrian facilities, public transportation 7% Parks/recreation,cultural and community opportunities 6% Planning/managing growth,downtown, city center 6% , Don't know,no comment 3% •r-. Other - - 12% • Total 100% ._ _-�-- fJ The National Citizen SurveyTM 2 City of Spokane Valley I 2011 VERBATIM RESPONSES TO OPEN - ENDED QUESTIONS The following pages contain the respondents'verbatim responses as written on the survey and have not been edited for spelling or grammar. Responses have been organized by coiled topic areas according to the first topic given. WHAT ONE THING DO YOU BELIEVE THE CITY CAN DO TO MAKE SPOKANE VALLEY A BETTER COMMUNITY? Government, community relations, budget/taxation, maintaining services Be more publicly seen. I have asked several people what our mayor's name is, guess what the answer is. Nopel Get out there we pay you, talk to us other than meetings and a spot on HLN. Better communication - letters-advertising to homes. I never hear about anything going on - I don't have e-mail. Better communication on events, planning and any other things that will effect our community and our lives and get rid of that round about on Montgomery it is more hazard than help. Better communication with community members to encourage involvement in events. Citizen involvement. Continue what is being done in an efficient and cost conscious manner. Dissolve Dissolve- return to what was this additional layer of Gov. Only cost more $. Do a better job of making people aware of events, public meetings, etc, and have a police department that actually responds to you, returns phone calls, and follows up written a crime is reported. Elect candidates as individuals, not as political blogs. and show equal concern for residential, commercial and public interests. Follow the peoples advice. Get rid of "city" of Spokane Valley-what a joke! Big power-grab. Do you people even live here? Thanks for wasting my time with your survey. Have a more diverse city council. Have a T.V. Questions & report on the above things that are good or bad for the Valley. Have it go back to the way it was before it was incorporated into a ridiculous city. Why do politicians or wanna B's, always have to find a way to screw things up, when it was just fine the way it was. Honest communication with families in the community. I feel we don't need two mayor, etc. We should be part of Spokane city. ir Include all citizens when making decisions. Increase awareness of opportunities of volunteering. I love volunteering and live in an apartment complex and never receive news on how/where to get involved. It would be nice if the Valley council would make peace with each other its the main reason -„ rioted to make the Valley it's own city because Spokane city council was always fighting no Spokane Valley is doing the same that doesn't do anyone any good. Just as it is doing caring for the population. Keep city taxes at an essential minimum. Keep doing what you are doing. Keep up the good work. The National Citizen SurveyTM 3 City of Spokane Valley I 2011 Keep up with your surveys involving interaction w/citizens, etc. Less regulation by government local, state and especially the federal government. Less taxes and be kinder to new business trying to get up and running. Not so strict until they can see if they are going to make it. Listen to the neighbor hoods that do not want businesses right next door. Be careful & consistent with your zoning! Listen to the voice of the people and don't give in to the "wants" of developers who want to make our once beautiful valley into a wall to wall "catch all" of low income houses. Owners of property- remove the plywood - make property attractive for business and don't set Valley go the way. Mall died for neglect! Lower business taxes enough to encourage more mid to large. Companies to move to our area. Jobs = prosperity for community, Thank you. Lower prop taxes. Lower outrageous (instead of increase). Traffic signal work, i.e. add more blinking yellow lefts like already at Broadway/Evergreen. Also poor traffic signal operation. I.e. All east/west bound traffic on mission is stopped for a vehicle traveling north on McDonald and turning right. Lower taxes for fixed income individuals before they are forced to move. Lower taxes to encourage businesses to relocate here, and quit hitting us home owners up for more money. Lower taxes, cut spending, stop new spending. Lower taxes: The property taxes keep raising every year and the appraisal is higher on our house, but very few houses are selling and the prices keep dropping. Our house payments have gone up #200.00 per month to cover the property taxes and were retired and can't afford it. Make it easier to get building permits and faster. Make it fair to all people in businesses not just a few. Make up their minds on issues. Making the Spokane Valley a city was a huge mistake. There is more bureaucracy and many business have closed. I was never in favor of the new city of Spokane Valley. More newsletters. More visable leadership. New city council that doesn't believe that everything should center on commercial businesses. On the whole you're doing a good. Every department can always find some place in their department for improvement. Openess & honesty in public servants! IN Pay attention to what the people say. L: Personally. Disband the city. But realistically-elected officials to stop in fighting- stop pie in the sky projects (IE)-one way on Sprague, what is done is done let it go-stop harassing business with frivolous codes! Regulations and inform the officials about a business before you dump on them) ■ Pool more services with the county. m Programs for broad involvement. Promote more "neighbor" type events. Stay on local issues. ■ Provide more information. I am new here and would like to know more about Spokane Valley. Provide tax incentives that are favorable enough to cause businesses to want to relocate to the Sprang corridor. Pull it's head out.... EVERY level of gummint has been thinking the same way for FAR too long "the agenda we institute now, the following generations can pay for".... The problem is EVERY newly elected official thinks the same way... Yes, it takes lots of money to run a city, a state, a country.... But if you SPEND more than you generate in revenue, you either are a blithering The National Citizen Survey"' 4 City of Spokane Valley 1 201 1 idiot or you just don't give a rip about anything but your own greedy, greasy little piece of the pie.... • Quit spending and raising taxes!!! Reduce property tax. Replace some of our council man, put people in that listen to the people. Require higher education degree's "appropriate" for all elected city government positions. The vetting process should be substantially more thorough for these individuals that at present. Stop arguing among city council -they did away with past planning but don't seem to know what to do to experience things 2 way streets east of disk son mica would help business. Stop bickering among themselves. Stop cutting spending on the important aspects of our community like police, fire and school. Tax rate. The vision statement only a pp lies if your monthly is above poverty and you are not disabled. There is no set direction when they make one they don't stay w/it. Set a direction and be decisive and persistent. They are like the president issues-talk talk-talk -we need issues done now- not so much devouring- I feel so much politics has taken over. This survey is one thing-being receptive to the needs of the community. To have a balanced budget, to keep our environment clean. To see what the city says-will be kept up to its word not tax but really see where the money is going. • Unincorporate. That was pushed at us for so many years and was voted down each time. I feel people got tired of it and it only passed because of very little voter turn out. Go back to being Spokane County not city of Spoken Valley. Use wisdom when spending our money, save for emergencies, teach those who live on welfare generation after generation - how to work for their assistance. We have lived in the Spokane area for 25 years, but in Spokane Valley less than two years so much of our activity & life is in other areas so am uniformed about much here. A better community is a community without much government control. Let freedom ringl Transportation, traffic flow, street changes, road maintenance, snow plowing t5 n After snow removal -offer"dig" drive way help for those that cannot do it themselves. ri Apple Way through to the East. Better snow removal in winter on residential streets. Arterials are good but our street hardly ever gets & plowed, if at all. i3 Better street repair & mat. n,8 Complete Apple Way Complete-one-way Valley traffic on Sprague could be better with this project finished. Complete Apple Way costly. Don't let the streets fall apart. If we continue to neglect repairs the streets will look like the city of Spokane and will cost much more in the way term to repair, Eliminate blind intersections of streets. So many are blocked with high shrubs and fences. Eliminate one way Sprague Ave Enforce speed & stop sign violations on Bettman rd also loud mufflers on cars & motor cycles. Enforce the illegal use of cell phones while driving. Extend the one way couplet east with more cross streets for better circulation & commercial opportunities. The National Citizen SurveyTM 5 City of Spokane Valley I 2011 Extend the one ways (Apple Way & Sprague Ave.) to Pines Road. Improve snow removal /DE- icing before morning rush hour. Faster snow removal. Find some way to plow the residential streets without piling large snow and ice ridges into the driveways. Also, the flowing of snow in these areas should be done only when needed. Fix pot holes on side streets. Fix roads (Not 20 Q a time). Fix Sprague Ave very bumpy. Fixed the street. Get rid of the round about. I feel the planning for installing a sewer system for Barker road and side streets was NOT good. Rerouting the traffic on 8th Ave. turned our street into a Freeway. Also the dust, vibrations on the houses near Barker&the car and truck was terrible. Why couldn't they use the other cross streets as and alternative route some of the time? We needed a break! That is my only complaint -overall, I love Spokane Valley-Thanks! If all the roads are completely fix. Improve the quality of life by improving safe non-motorized travel the creation. Leave Apple Way as a one way street. Leave Sprague & Apple Way as they are one way streets & expand them make speed make good make more sidewalks especially around school. So children don't have to walk on streets to get to school. Leave Sprague 1 way. Have Sprague 1 way from Sullivan to the one way is now Leave Sprague Ave as is-do not make it two way from University to Fancier. Thank you for listening to what the public wants & not the few business owners. We don't want a "city center" at U-city. Leave the Sprague/Apple Way corridor as it is. We have spent money to make it look nice and it does a good job moving traffic. Less snow removal is better than too much, fire the dog catcher, write more speeding tickets, enforce "No trucks" zones. rt Maintain street/parks/and community centers. Make traffic lights last longer for the elderly on canes, walkers, wheel chairs and others on L canes,walkers, wheel chairs. No real pressing political or Govt. Issues I do wish you'd quit reducing travel lanes- IE. Broadway- more people- more cars- less lane miles?? Makes no sense. Stop using traffic enforcement as revenue enhancement ". More education, less traffic Gestapo. Open up all of Sprague Ave to 2-way traffic. This would encourage new business growth. Please, I beg of you: do not plow our driver ways shut with bales of snow and ice. We have many 80-90 yr old neighbors that need access in and out of their homes. Plow the snow in the winter, do more community functions. Where is Downtown Spokane Valley? Pot holes. Put a stop light at Farr- Broadway traffic is too heavy. Quick Debating Sprague Avenue returning to 2 way & get on with rest of Gov't. Too much $ $ on way ward contents on the project of $ needed for roads, etc. Do not waste any more time $ ra on this!! Return Sprague Avenue to 2 way traffic between University and Fancier ASAP. n Return two-way traffic on Sprague from university flinched!! The one way system is crazy!!! Reverse the 1 way (go back to 2 way) on Sprague & build a belt way going F & W on the/way left road. The National Citizen Survey1M 6 City of Spokane Valley I 2011 Road repairs are surely lacking both in the Valley & the city. Really sucks! Roads & bridges. Snow plowing during the winter! Stop discussing the Apple Way and lets finish the one way to Barker Rd & stop the move to return Sprague to & two way street. Stop plowing snow on residential side walks already cleared for children to get to school and drive ways which have been cleared by resident, pile it in the center. Stop turning 4 lane roads into 2 lane roads. Street repair Street repairs, crime prevention and more recreational and community activities. Take care of snow removal, Better or more police, better timed street lites. Timing of traffic signals on Sullivan & Pines & Argonne. Traffic/Signs World population and the Valley keep growing so "no" to return to two-way Sprague think long term. Safety, law enforcement Add on in time if money is available more city police. Arrest & kick out "Gangs" thugs who steal everything, who are disrespectful, tagging fences & signs, get rid of panhandlers, tell young people to pull up their G. D. Pants Build a new larger Jail improve the Valley Police Dept, Anti-business don't tax new out businesses of maintain the Valley sewers, catch basins, dry wells, sumps, H-units, etc. Don't rely on the County Street Dept, to do it all; including their other responsibilities. Educate police on the word "fair". Enforce gang crime resolution -put more. 2. Criminals in jail longer! 3. Patrol/police in residential neighborhoods. 4. Start teaching right/wrong earlier/more often. (PD to schools, etc.) 5. Follow through. Get control of crime. Get druggies off street. More extra activities -shops- dinning-walk trails streets (Apple Way 45 speed limit)? Over all great jobs- 1 don't feel safe walking around by myself due to all the drug heads out there. Get the county out, they are a waste of money with equips overhand costs and employee pay & pension costs, the sheriffs dept. Drive like crop on 190 and waste money flying a helicopter every Friday night over 190 and Argonne. Go after drug trafficking more. Have a better police officer respect. Police officers in Spokane Valley shot to death anyone they think is a problem. They don't care who the problem is. They will shot you they are like a bad . gang. Who is training these cops? Have more police on patrol in the night hours (9p-3a) near the bar locations on Sprague, and on Sullivan where apartments are located; particularly 4th St. & Sullivan. • Have the crime rate go down; Cleaner streets and playgrounds. d Improve relationship between civilians and police. • Larger police presence. Make our police department accountable for their actions. (Killing people) innocent people. .4 Too much power corrupts. More alert police awareness of drug trafficking around schools and parks mainly after school hours and evening stronger opposition against legalization of Marijuana. More reliable police force, more sense of safety not taking unnecessary force. The National Citizen SurveyTM 7 City of Spokane Valley 1 2011 Neighborhood watch plan - repainting the yellow lines on main roads especially the Valley needs clearer "lanes" painted! Out people who using drugs arougn kids in thir apt and homes. Pay more attention to the theft rate too many people are having cars stolen from them. Police force concentrate more on safety or emergency calls other than spending time to hide and watch for DUI's Stop the crime, of people hurting people thank you Jeannine. The city of Spokane Valley would do well to install video coins at key/and or random areas for crime prevention, mainly Graffiti, I have seen a rise in recent years in conjunction with the city of Spokane or, on the other hand, provide some outlet like youth education, and the like, for people with nothing better to do. The police need to be updated on the laws of panhandling in the Valley. I've talked to many officers and they had no idea that it was against the law. Train police officers; hold them accountable for their poor attitudes and lack of care for people. "To serve and protect" used to mean exactly that. I'm astounded by the lack of courtesy and respect given to citizens. Domestic violence training. Removal of apathy. Very little police presence in area I live which is senior Apts. Across from yokes on Montgomery Ave. The owners of this complex provide no security for us who are retired in this complex. Shame on them!!! We think the city is doing a great job! We love it here! One thing the city can do is continue to keep violent crime down. Appearance, code enforcement Beautification and getting people involved/volunteering. Clean garbage out of run-down (Home owners) personal lots along Park Rd & most of there up to Havana Street. It is a "sore eye"when driving by. Clean it upl Clean up a bit. Make businesses more responsible for the appearance of their public areas feature a member of city government in the newsletter(I really don't know who they are). Clean up industrial buildings that have been abandoned. Bird control! Clean up some of the trailer parks, get rid of empty run down buildings, have the owners of this properties clean them up. Plus the side walks. Clean up the huge bare patch adjacent to Carnahan road between 9th and 14th avenues. Clean up the mess left where the city hall was started of university and Sprague. What kind of example is that? Code compliance. Home owners do have rights but not choosing to take care of your property should not be one of them. Collecting junk, not shoveling snow so that seniors, children & mothers W/strollers have to walk in the street etc. Also all the empty businesses that are not kept up make the entire community took bad. Business owners should also have side walks! ig Encourage people to clean up trash & old cars. Enforce clean up of empty properties by there owners so they look nice! I live off Sinto and Mullen and the building there collapsed after heavy snow about 5 yrs ago and the wrecked structure is an ugly weed filled mess just left. • Enforce code compliance (weeds, cars, etc). Get someone to move into a few of the empty business buildings not allow any new permits until current properties are occupied. s Have business owners clean up or demolish empty rundown buildings especially along the Sprague corridor the overall look of S.U. Is trashy- no family shops,just car & boat lots. The National Citizen Survey1M 8 City of Spokane Valley 2011 Businesses should maintain buildings better-too many ad. Signs. We have no welcoming entry into Valley not like CDA does! No used car lots up & down Sprague. Improve cleanliness, bird control. Air quality as well as health food stores. Improve the appearance on Sprague. • Keep the sheriff vans with the inmate cleaning the Valley. It is much cleaner than downtown. Make businesses keep up the outside of their buildings (weeds, garbage). Go back to Sprague being two ways instead of having it one way in some areas. Make everybody pick up their trash /junk cars and junk lots. "Enforce" code regulations- don't give up & pass the buckll More emphasis on lots with junk, cars, boats, RV'S to be cleaned up. Environmental hazards. • Take care of apartment's that have bad mold. Take down all store signs, use a community standard designated small signs for the advertising, 2. Designed urban planning for separate apts/owners/homes, 3. Half sidewalk closed for pedestrians all winter for easier pathways. There are many side roads that have trees or bushes that block stop signs this is a very dangerous for all concerned. Broadway and Farr Rd. Need stop light! To me I think the first impression anyone gets from a town or city, is the overall appearance, how well is it maintained and kept up. A look is in the eye of the beholder. Try to get all these vacant buildings rented or leased? Consolidate the city hall offices in one area or Bldg. Use of newer vacant buildings more police protection better little league base ball facilities - see what Hayden covered alone, post falls has - unbelievable ballparks. Jobs/economic development Another grocery store at Pines-N-Sprague where Albertsons use to bel • Attract business with a living wage. Be more business friendly empty store fronts such as U-city mall are an eye sore in the city. Promote civic pride so people will clean up vacant buildings/lots and houses. Bring more jobs. Clean up yards vacant lots (trash is big issue). Bring on High tech industry's. Better lay. Been here 20 year & same pay-0-turn over Bring on more business and create more job opportunities. Create more jobsi Create affordable recreation center(like the Kroc center) Determine what influences caused big businesses (HP, Kaiser, Boeing etc) to decide not to continue business in this area. Draw in more businesses to make it business friendly. Give incentives to attract new business that will employ more than 1-5 people-with an income above men's wage. Encourage business that would hire college educated people. Encourage all young people to stay! Great job done attracting businesses to the Valley, but a balance between that and maintaining quality of life must be met. I do not feel that the city has any identity. Services did not improve with the annexation of property from the county to the cit. Establish the city with a destination area- quality restaurants quality shopping. For that I go to Spokane. I work for a business that is currently trying to expand - at every turn we are running into permitting issues-way too much oversite!!1 is Job growth o Make more business and give more people work. ■ More high quality restaurants, more walking trails. ■ More jobs The National Citizen SurveyTM 9 City of Spokane Valley 2011 More jobs/not computer jobs. More jobs for displaced mothers. Also, affordable education. • Obtain new businesses. • Sprague Ave is sad loss, business and otherwise, when once it was thriving, more so since this became a city- it even looks terrible. I'm a bit ashamed, so should leadership be. Support business change Sprague to a two way. Support new business better. Give incentives to stay in Spokane Valley. Have are own snow removal plows to take better care of out streets. City Council & Mayor take a pay cut like the rest of us! Support small business (real one, not corps or banks), no to nepotism, support diversity, no to fear & corporate bank. Work better with exciting business be more welcoming to new- small business treat business people. Like you would like to be would if you were wanting to start a business in Spokane Valley. Work with businesses to get costumers and keep costumers-be more understanding when business have code questions, or issues help a business use resources to advertise-sign usage if people don't know a business is there no tax money no business- help and work with. Education, services to youth Affordable child care for parents. Better schools- invest in education if you want to be a family friendly community. Build at least 2 girls & boy's club. Kids need somewhere to go, and not get into trouble with good influence too. It'd be great for community service, as well. Businesses should hire the young 16-22 yrs old with no experience & train them. Give out & have them fill out applications at businesses instead of on-line. Their is no way to check where your application is when contacting employer, the old way is better by being able to call up the employer in personnel office. Drop-in centers for youth/teens-when teens get bored, they are more likely to cause trouble, drink and do drugs. Focus on our schools and our children. It takes a community to raise a child!! I also think that it could be a more racially diverse community. Have events for teens. Have flashing lights when children are going and getting out of school. . Help more with child care, and activities for children. Help schools w/major (necessary) improvements. The bonds need to be passed to improve school safety & learning. I believe that the city can make Spokane Valley a better community by building a college in the Spokane Valley area. Improve the schools, their staff and performance! Improve appearance of the Valley, business opportunities jobs, affordable housing for everyone! Spokane Valley is referred to as the ghetto by college kids and out of town people. Very embarrassing! . Kids have nothing to do-basket ball and tennis courts are easy to build and maintain -swings and sand lots for the younger ones, especially in the hoods behind U-city. • More activities for families to attend w/children. hl More things for kids to do better restaurants like downtown. e School improvements-maybe charging the building contractors for housing developments a fee to accommodate increase in school needs. I Spend more money on education. The National Citizen SurveyTM to City of Spokane Valley 1 201 1 There needs to be more services/areas for youth. We live in a lower income area & there are very few side walks, parks (1 mini one within/mile or more radius) pools, community centers. There is just nothing for kids/youth to do which creates opportunity for "illegal" activities. There's not much around here for teenagers to do. Could use another skating rink (right where the old Albertson's used to be on the corner of Sprague and pines the building has been empty for years! This farming community you call Spokane has nothing affordable for teen against you cry about all the crime, Cheney has more to offerl Try to hire better teachers that care for the children. Get more money for education. We need more cost efficient activities for our youth. The economical situation and the job prospects and rising cost make it very difficult for families- actually people of all ages. Alternative transportation, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, public transportation Add bus to pickup passengers from Trent and Sullivan to Pine Street. Better bus service through out the city. Better bus service to seniors that have no transportation and that live more than 6 blocks from nearest bus stop. Expand bus line once or twice a week to include north of river off Barker road and Liberty Lake. Better bus service, better animal control. Better bus system, more bicycle & pedestrian friendly, in the neighborhood. Calling Spokane Valley a"city" when very few sidewalks exist and home mail delivery replaces rural mail boxes on the streets. Expand and diversify bicycle/ped paths on trails; especially on roads and through fares. Create an image for the Valley that may draw on attraction to travel, outdoors, and recreation & get tourist dollars!! I think, there need more public transportation. Its own bus system. Partner with STA to keep# 90 running to the UTC. Then transfer to the Valley system. Make bicycle paths on the streets. More bicycle/pedestrian oriented infrastructure- ERGO, "Complete streets". More bike-friendly roads. More bike paths/pedestrian trails. More bus service for the outlining areas, around Trent & pines and Sullivan. Please! We need more bus routes. Don't let the buses and the Valley community down. We need the buses and could use some that go out Wellesley Please! 15 yrs living in the Valley and Spokane Valley is crowning so please! More buses or trolley thx. Put in sidewalks in residential neighborhoods! Sidewalks, trails, bike rates & community events Some how make move of a city center that's Pedestrian attractive - a safe place may involved with education & recreation. Walk signals need to he longer in timing. People if walking are still in street when don't walk comes on. Don't like being told on TV by new casters. We are on our own when a small crime or burglary has accused to any one. Because police have better things to control! That just invites trouble! Also don't like that week police station on Sprague in Valley is closed! We need more local bus support. Not just STA running their reg. Lines. r3 We need more sidewalks-for safety of adults & children, to encourage walking places without walking in the street and to help bring neighbors together- Millwood and outer areas do not have sidewalks. The National Citizen SurveyTM 11 City of Spokane Valley 2011 Well for one this was the county and for this to be a city it starts by having side walks and curbs. I thought the county did better snow remove all then the city, you eventual a city you got it, now you want this city for business taken what wouldn't raise taxes and now line sure you want to. Parks/recreation, cultural and community opportunities Add more play ground equipment in some of the parks. An important quality of life would be to have a dog park in the Valley. More bike trails, paths for hiking. Balfor Park needs to be extended. Building a park will attract business! Start small, not big. Cancel SARP! My business was unable to expand and I was forced to close due to the new 'community inspired' improvements. Better parks. Bring more entertainment like performers, musicals etc., and 2. Repair Rds 3. Clean up lots- remove pan handlers, 4. Faster snow removal. Community centers w/better recreational programming better bus routes/options for Eco- responsible transportation. Encourage neighborly participation -activities, volunteering, safety. Extend Balfor Park- build a park & business will come. Micro parks-smaller parks within larger neighborhoods. SARP sucks! My father had to close his business. I think an increased sense of community would encourage residents to take more pride in the community. (i.e. Spokane Valley farmers market, community clean-up clays, etc.) More activities together. Encourage people to get to know neighbors and lend a hand where needed. More cultural activities More Theater, art, music. More user friendly his services, Too many cars for transportation. Multi cultural activities for the community as a whole. Provide more recreation areas. May be a dog park. We haven't been a 'city' very long and it just sort of happened! Let would be nice to have a community 'event' on something where it would high light our togetherness and elected officials could be more seen and known by sight. Some event we could have or promote as our city's own special event- maybe every year? Like a community fair or fun sum? Planning/managing growth, downtown, city center Build & downtown and expand around that, clean up Sprague it is so disgusting, the Spokane Valley is the ugliest sty I've ever lived inl! City Center- University City to be either torn down or refurbished! Develop a business district in Mullen/Argonne corridor-create a sense of cohesive community-the Valley is ugly and divisive. Control growth more. Do not let deep pockets change zoning rules (which I have seen in the county & L.L.). Have affordable housing for lower income families (30, 40% of AMI). Create a core of the city where the main business areas are- not by the river. Existing unused business/buildings give a left-behind impression. While developing new areas outside the r center of the city speaks to abandoning the old, Develope a city center- in the center of the city-. Get out of the way of private development. Go back to old zoning, finish Apple Way from University to Sullivan, the county and city need r17 to work together! The National Citizen SurveyTM 12 City of Spokane Valley 1 2011 Have a more defined "downtown" or center 8. Spokane Valley & green space, shops/cafes & character, and condos/townhouses on perimeter. Make downtown of Spokane Valley more interesting/exciting place to be. Add a water feature. Everyone loves water features. I truly believe we need to look at our surroundings first- improve on what we already have then open up to the various attractions/business's. If we want growth Spokane Valley needs to have a "downtown core"- more neighborhood restaurants & shops. Keeping it a smaller community. Less new housing, Better police petrol. Make good use out if all the buildings with good locations, such as the farmer University City. Pay more attention to the zoning laws. Plan new development to more closely resemble surrounding properties. It looks terrible what you are doing now! Swales at curbs not good for passengers exiting parked vehicles or getting in the vehicle! Realize that this is an urban community and work to provide excellent urban services while reducing sprawl. Slow expansion Slow population growth in the Valley, Stop building new home, restraints, business while others remain empty. Use what we have first. Stop wasting. Stop building strip malls! Spokane Valley is a city of strip malls! Also get rid of all the "medical marijuana" shops! They are gross & unsightly! (Sorry. That was two things!). Stop letting business/development change/bend break our zoning laws for profit & the detriment of our natural resources. The draw to the Valley is its, low key, quiet like style, minimal traffic,would not trade that for anything! Existing! Business flourish would be good but beware of too much new growth it would change the very thing that makes the Valley special. Don't know, no comment Can't say far too old. Can't think of anything extra. Don't know Don't know Don't know. I have no Idea, I just moved here from another town. I have no idea. I have only been here for a few months so I wouldn't have the slightest idea. Nothing at this time. Other r3 Be more God like-and really love thy neighbor-and come to terms that God is the head- , instead of talking. Being truthful. Change its name to "opportunity" and run with itl Encourage local organic food production and independent non-corporate media. ` Finding illegal immigrants and paying more attention to the crimes and communities roads. try u Free wireless internet for everyone in Spokane Valley. 2 Get rid of all or most drug dispensers (marijuana). Get rid of planned parent hood and xxx smut shops. The National Citizen SurveyTM 13 City of Spokane Valley 1 2011 Have your own Spokane Valley newspaper. I am a retired citizen who moved to Spokane Valley twelve years ago and I have been very pleased living here but I am in a retirement center with all utilities payed. Taxes garbage etc. So not involved much in how businesses are run. I feel the education system is very good. Libraries are good -doctor service & hospital very good. I live in an apartment complex that used to have an opportunity to recycle. A few years ago the recycle bins were removed, never to return. Recycling is a big deal to me & others I know. Now the garbage bins are over flowing, largely due to lack of recycling. What must happen in order to start being able to recycle again? Improve the quality of the air and the tap water. Reduce the strip mining of concrete production ingredients. Electric cars! More wind and solar power options. (As well as, gas power available at reasonable rates, for construction workers.) (Trucks can be required and spends). Increase preservation of natural areas monitor company pollutants. Maintenance • Make the Spokane Valley signs bigger 32nd & highway 27 is too small. We need to let traffic know that they are driving in the city of Spokane Valley. Not a suburb. Move the chamber of commerce out of the basement in Liberty Lake. Never be ashamed or afraid of the truth and honesty in all things. Slow the fast trains 50+ miles a hour, on treat between Best Rd and Flora Rd. There are no cross roads on the tracks. Also blowing the horn at night so people can't get to sleep very well, all night long. Tout the Valley in a more independent way. Update & improve Valley general hospital. It's now unsafe & the Valley people are afraid of it & go to deaconess insteadl It's a waste of the Valley resources now. Without doubt. . . Spokane needs to stop saying its "international" and start being it! If this community embraced people of all races and made this part of the vision actively attracting all kinds of cultures. . . A safe heaven we would boom in growth. 1: u 'rS i3 7 r■ rr 0 ta 7 .r The National Citizen SurveyTM 14 CITY Or SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 02/07/2012 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent LI old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Miscellaneous Items GOVERNING LEGISLATION: None PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The staff has various issues that Council may want to discuss at the retreat. A) City Council receives emails either directly or collectively as a group. The City also receives emails in the general City Hall mailbox which are addressed to Councilmembers. Some questions are policy related and should be responded to by Council, and some are administrative that are best responded to by staff. At times it is difficult for all parties concerned to know who is responding. Staff would like to have a general discussion with Council on how these emails should be handled, B) Open Public Meetings as it relates to email. C) Animal Shelter — Spokane County is reviewing other options for an animal shelter and staff would like to update City Council. D) 10`x' Anniversary -a The City will celebrate its 10th Anniversary in 2013. Staff would like to discuss options. E) Railroad Quiet Zones — On January 31, 2012, Council requested information on the Railroad Quiet Zones. Enclosed is the information which was presented to Council at the November 1, 2011 Council meeting. F) Time Permitting - Other miscellaneous items to discuss. OPTIONS: None RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Mike Jackson ATTACHMENTS: Railroad Quiet Zones Powerpoint Presentation, 11/1/11. DISCUSSION CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: Nov 1, 2011 City Manager Sign-Off: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Railroad Quiet Zones GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Discussion at 10/26/10, 12/7/10, 3/22/11, 7/26/11, 8/9/11, 8/23/11 Council Meetings. At 8/23/11 meeting a contract to engage the engineering firm of DEA for design work for a Quiet Zone at the UP Park and Vista crossings received less than a majority vote, and staff was instructed to do further research including a look at all crossings within the city. BACKGROUND: The examination of quiet zones was initiated by a petition by citizens in the area of the UPRR Park and Vista crossings. Staff was subsequently asked to prepare a possible contract with a qualified engineering firm to perform the detailed design work needed to convert the two crossings into a whistle free quiet zone. Such a contract was placed upon the council agenda for the Aug 23, 2011 meeting. The proposed contract was with David Evans and Associates (DEA) in the amount of $82,551. This amount is not currently budgeted. The contract failed to receive a majority vote at this meeting. Staff was asked to do additional research including the possible use of wayside horns, and a review of all major railroad crossings within the city. Attached is that report. OPTIONS: Council direction: (1) Further research; (2) No further action at the present time, or, (3) Pursue a specific option. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None BUDGETIFJNANCIAL IMPACTS: Creation of quiet zones or use of wayside horns will require capital expenditures well in excess of$100,000, not currently funded. STAFF CONTACT: Roger Crum, Interim Deputy City Manager; Neil Kersten, Public Works Director; Inge Note, Senior Traffic Engineer ATTACHMENTS: 1. Summary Memo 2. Quiet Zone Briefing pScri okane Valley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ lax: 509.921.1008 • cityhall@spokanevalley.org _ - _ Memorandum To: Mayor&Council From: Roger Crum, Interim Deputy City Manager CC: Date: Oct 27,2011 Re: Railroad Quiet Zones This memo is a summary of the full briefing which will be given at the City Council study session on November 1. On August 23, 2011, the City Council considered a contract with David Evans &Associates (DEA) for $82,551 to perform detailed design analysis of the Union Pacific (UP) rail crossings at Park and Vista Roads with the intent to convert them into 'Quiet Zones' where the train whistles would no longer be used. The Council voted not to proceed with the DEA contract, but asked staff for additional information on the applicability of Quiet Zones throughout the City of Spokane Valley, and the possible use of wayside horns in lieu of train whistles. This report is in response to that request. Approach This is intended to be a layman's examination of the Quiet Zone issue. No attempt has been made to perform an engineering analysis or specific cost analyses, for which I am not qualified. Inga Note, Senior Engineer for Traffic, is very knowledgeable on the subject and can address more detailed questions if needed. For purposes of this analysis, I attempted to answer the following questions: 1. What is a Quiet Zone and how can it be implemented? 2. What are approximate implementation costs of Quiet Zone techniques? 3. Are 'Wayside Horns' a viable and less expensive alternative? 4. Are there other railroad crossings in Spokane Valley which should be considered? 1 Quiet Zones (QZ) Quiet Zones are simply grade level highway crossings of railroad tracks which have implemented traffic warning and control devices which have been certified by the Federal Railway Administration to be safe enough that a train whistle is not required, Unless there is a certified Quiet Zone or certified Wayside Horn system, locomotive engineers are required by law to utilize on-board whistles prior to each grade crossing, The laws pertaining to QZ's are detailed and complex and are contained in a 53 page Federal Register dated August 17, 2006. These regulations were adopted in 2005 after a multi-year review of crossing safety. For our purposes the important fact is that these regulations totally preempt any local control, and neither local jurisdictions nor the railroads may deviate from them. Creating a new Quiet Zone is consequently a long and complex process. Even the filing of intent by the local jurisdiction is complex, Only fully 'engineered solutions' are permitted, and a specific safety analysis must be performed in conjunction with the railroad before approval. All Quiet Zones must be at least a half mile in length. For a certified quiet zone the following are considered eligible fixes for each grade crossing. They are referred to as Supplemental Safety Measures (SSM's) in the regulations: 1. Full closure of the street. 2. A full featured `four-quadrant gate' system (all lanes in both directions) 3. A full featured 'two-quadrant gate' system (all lanes in the direction of travel) plus traffic channelization to prevent traffic from going around the gates. 4. Converting street to one-way plus a full featured gate system. 5. Closure of the street during a portion of the 24 hour day (usually at night.) Other than street closures, these solutions can be expensive. A new 'four-quadrant' gate system will cost from $300,000 to $500,000. A new 'two-quadrant' gate system where none exists may be in the range of $200,000. Channelization and median costs vary greatly, but usually are the least expensive solution, if feasible, where a full featured gate system is already in place. It should be noted that medians or channelization require a minimum of 60 feet distance from the gate to the nearest intersection or commercial driveway. (Many of our crossings do not have that 60 feet.) Wayside Horns An alternative to Quiet Zones is the use of a 'wayside horn' in lieu of the on-board train whistle. There are several companies manufacturing and installing theses devices. One of them, Quiet Zone Technologies, out of Texas, has provided the City with some excellent information. 2 Under the Federal Law, wayside horns may be used on a crossing by crossing basis, as a one for one substitute for the train whistle. Thus, although the installations must be certified, they do not have to be in an official quiet zone. Wayside horns are installed on poles adjacent to the crossings and are directed at the on- coming traffic lanes. They sound a simulated train whistle towards the traffic, but are far more directional than on-board train whistles. There must, however, also be horns directed at side street traffic if adjacent to the crossing. Most importantly, wayside horns may only be implemented where there is an existing full featured gate and warning system with proper interconnect. While individual horn installations may range from $30,000 up, a full crossing installation with the necessary gate upgrades will normally exceed $100,000. If the funds were available,wayside horns could be a viable alternative for a few of our intersections. Review of Crossings There are two main east-west track routes in Spokane Valley, Union Pacific (UP) and Burlington Northern — Santa Fe (BNSF). Union Pacific currently operates fewer than ten daily trains through the city, while BNSF operates about 50 trains, with more than 25 considered through trains. There are eight at-grade traffic crossings on UP lines within the City and two more in Millwood. There are seven at-grade traffic crossings on BNSF lines within city limits. There are several side tracks in industrial areas, and a little used north-south route in the City, but these were not examined as part of this analysis. A full review of these crossing with pictures is contained in the attached briefing. A synopsis is as follows (the numbering system is entirely my own and merely counts from west to east): 1. UP-1 Park Rd — Part of original petition. Unfortunately does not have an existing gate. A 'QZ' or wayside horns would first require installation of a full gate system. 2. UP-2 Vista Rd —Part of original petition. Possible candidate for wayside horn. 3. M-UP-1 (Millwood) Marguerite—Has no existing warning system or gates 4. M-UP-2 (Millwood) Argonne--Would require new quad-gate system 5. UP-3 Montgomery (west)—Commercial area 6. UP-4 Montgomery (east)—Commercial area, Fire Station 7. UP-5 Pines Rd at Indiana—High traffic, freeway adjacent, commercial area 8. UP-6 Mirabeau Parkway at Indiana —Would require multi-lane quad gate 9. UP-7 Flora Rd —Open industrial area 10. UP-8 Barker Rd--'Tee' Intersection with Euclid, possible candidate for wayside horn 11. BN-1 Park Rd —Existing medians. Possible candidate for 'QZ' 12. BN-2 Vista Rd--Existing two-quad gate. With medians,possible candidate for'QZ' 13. BN-3 University—Existing 'QZ' utilizing extended medians. 14. BN-4 Pines Rd at Trent--Difficult intersection, some residential and commercial 15. BN-5 Evergreen Rd at Trent—Kaiser access, mostly open industrial 16. BN-6 Flora at Trent—Mostly open area 17. BN-7 Barker at Trent— Little residential, heavy truck traffic 3 Summary The original petition for a Quiet Zone at the Union Pacific crossings at Park and Vista would be expensive to implement ($300,000+?) due to the lack of a gate system at Park Rd. If an opportunity arises to procure safety funding to add a gate system at Park Rd in the future, quiet zone options could be reconsidered. If city capital funds were available, the Vista crossing could be a candidate for a four-way wayside horn system. The BNSF crossings at Park and Vista would seem to offer the most cost-effective opportunity for a full quiet zone, which could extend to include the existing quiet zone at University. A preliminary engineering analysis by a qualified firm would be required to determine if this option is feasible and what the costs might be (prior to committing to a full design study.) If capital funds were available, the UP Barker Rd crossing might be a candidate for a three-way wayside horn system. If installed, however, the horn facing the eastbound Euclid traffic would appear to be also pointing directly at the adjacent residential area. An existing long range goal of the City is, and should continue to be, to provide grade separation (overpass/underpass) for Park, Pines and Barker Road BNSF crossings for traffic flow and safety. This would also obviously remove the need for whistles to be used in those areas. While performing this review it was apparent that train whistles can be very intrusive on residential life, and it would be desirable to make all crossings into Quiet Zones. Unfortunately the cost to the City to do so is currently prohibitive. Consequently this report has tended to focus on those areas which might have the highest benefit to cost ratio. Without a detailed analysis, this means balancing the cost of the solution for a given crossing against the frequency of train travel and the number of citizens benefitted by that specific action. Realizing that whistle sounds travel long distances, prioritizing is still an imperfect process. 4 Railroad Quiet Zones Nov 1, 2011 Valley .r.-Ameer • - ....... ---,----__ — ,.....------zr—.._ .. •(n - —. ,..-• ,„7-:^.-- 4 . , • ;-•—:+ . .- _:.--- -- ____._,, , a 4- '■'-d..b. .... "rc -..' .... '-. ."''' -'-'-.1.."'.'"."'"""... ....1. ,xj. ....,...1.1,‘-■. 1,.........!:,..;,..:- ."..7:,....." 7 - _,.., . . _ '5-'-'7-..„ 1 7-'7---..-7.-- . iii•, =--7 i'' --7.--- 4.......,..- : e gin -"- ::: .,. -.. -1z _._.....,....- Nii. • r- . .........•....... ' .- . . ' • . ...• . ... ' Cr ,;..,. -■••.---`-' ' +c'.. '• ciTV o Background of Quiet Zones Defined and Regulated by Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Extensive Rewrite with Final Rule in 2005 Pre-empts all local regulation Mandates Train Whistle Use Except » When a certified local `Quiet Zone' is created » Or when specific type of `Wayside Horns' are used Instructions to Engineer (If no Quiet Zone) ter.. o"` ane --Walley° 0 Locomotive Horns must be sounded 15-20 seconds before entering al F public grade crossin • s, but not more than one-quay er mile in advance Two Long — One Short — One Long - Repeated as necessary until locomotive clears the crossng Engineer may do more based upon theah judgment Train Whistle must be between 96 — Q ecibels What is a Quiet Zone? v`l ane alley O Authorized to be established by Local Government a Must include all crossings for at least one-half mile c Must not raise `Risk Threshold' above `Nationwide Significant Risk Index' (Specific analysis required) O Usually includes multiple crossings and average risk index calculations over that length of track e Must be professionally engineered and use specific technology O Must be installed by Railroad at 100% Local Expense How do Railroads Feel about QZ's? = � Quote from Union Pacific web sorsee "Union Pacific believes quiet zones cornpromse the safety of railroad employees, customers, and the genera public." What Techniques Allowed. ? ifr vane Ref erred to as Supplementary Safety Measures - SSMC ' (Quiet Zone without Wayside Horns) Closing of Street — Temporary or Permanem Four Quadrant Gates (all lanes, both directions) Two Quadrant Gates with Medians/Channelizaticn (Must have at least 60 ft of median from gate to intersection or driveway) One Way Street with Gates Ai: Gates must fully cover lanes, have `constant warning', flashing lights, sensors, power out systems, etc. Extensive analysis and certification process required for ail Four uadrant Gate Four-Quadrant Gate Median Requirements e Gates with Medians or Channelization Devices Near Parallel Roadways J GO Minimum Length 60 r r 1.00' 100' Me:; e .5 n Curb Requirements (From Quiet Zone Technologies) Non-traversable Curb. Curb must be sic inches or greater Costs of SSM's per C ossing (Union Facific Estimates) Basic Active Warning System (Two-Quadrant Gate with all required features) - $185,000 - :'•400,000 Four-Quadrant Gate Systems - $300,000 - $500,000 Basic Interconnec - $5,000 - $15,000 Annual Maintenance Fee - $4,000 - $ '[ 0, 000iyear Wayside Horns aC"'9rrry o j Ejey Specifically approved horns may be mounted at the crossing, pointed at all approaches within 60' Crossing must have two quad' gate/light system with all safety features If a certified wayside horn is installed at a crossing, then it substitutes for the train whistle at that crossing. Not required to be in a full `Quiet Zone' City responsible for cost, annual maintenance, and liability Initial costs including signal uigrades usually $100,000+ per intersection for simple system. Wayside Horn Installation (From Quiet Zone Technologies) Spokane �.. ey Quiet Zone Indicator Train Horn Contour (From Quiet Zone Technologies) Train Horn Sound Contour 7-):7"."----1=-1 vim;_ , b;, c ^fix .- fy.a. • z '. -^T r.mod!' 7 �i•-- �Cj� �. '"r}y�.{• GISN 912 =4'3 ^et y 7f�i a'iy-- + y `• } 0 Wayside Horn Sound Contour (From Quiet Zone Technologies) Tayside Horn Sound Contour Datarosor.`Pl• • ;lr , + • rr? .ten TYr C do 7" ... �, �I' -., -�.F. r +�' i i- `r�`-`r 1 ^✓ , 7.;r: c �r ?'a 1 y -1•&:1; �w • 3 ty of )po ne Primary RR Grade Crossings . V B-6 — Ir C • friisimmommalgz .� MO■:a:M®1111 !'"-1.1111 � °� 'Nan rumain 09. eon mornizum sue- . i.mil +®®!!�lis ..ma �. i�■ L in A ran, ,. ,Id,Ism vEEEIiBBIML4g.EMIE-RIWBrmm 1 41=rillmazediregv ne\L == spa.. aria, .r.rarr� r+ Illellyd ni .d kw".ix7IMi.rsa Yi�1i��l7 lip ' , rte' 3a� lei® �!�!f t .fir 4 n, BNSF Line UP Line UP-1 Park Rd Crossing Se Review of UP/Park Rd Crossing UP--1 : Park Rd — Moderate use, two lane, flashing lights but no gates, Residential, Intersection adjacent To include in a Quiet Zone or to use Wayside Horns would first require installation of qualified two-quad gate system. Cost: $200,000? If a gate system were in place, adjacent road is too close for a median system to be used Options with gate installation : Wayside horn or Four quad gate. Total Cost: $300,000? U7-2 Vista Rd Crossing Sfijkani e M-UP-1 Marguerite Rd Crossin . pOkane Miliwood M.-UP-2 Argonne Rd Crossing iliwood Valley UP-3 Montgomery (west) Crossing Sfonlffl'ie ley+. UP-4 Montgomery (east) Crossing 17 [111 -L. *ft _•• UP-5 Pines Rd Crossing Same -57 ey r. _11.041,2.24 7 • - ' • .;•-..r UP-6 Mirabeau Pkwy Crosshg rirsir Spokane P "1 1 L. UP-7 Flora Rd Crossing UP-8 Barker Rd Crossing Sn for !1fLTe ey' u BNSF-1 Park Rd Crossing Srit5kane 00Valley. B N SF-2 Vista Rd Crossng Sfiblime .000V alley- BNSF-3 University Crossing (Existing Quiet Zone, Looking South) BNSF-3 University Crossing (Existing Quiet Zone, Looking North) *lane ley BNSF-4 Pines Rd Crossing crn Spoiime : 5;Valley BNSF-5 Evergreen Crossin pkane Valley. --g IO • • [.) . • - I r r- .. • - . • ' • BNSF-6 Flora Rd Crossing Spode e BNSF-7 Barker Rd Crossing Review of Crossings - UP Page 1 of 3 Span kane a UP-1 : Park Rd — Moderate use, two lane, flashing lights but no gates, Residential, Intersection adjacent, Median would not work » Assessment: Would have to have gates installed, then could use wayside horns or four-quadrant gates. Median does not work (Cost estimate $300,000 +) UP-2: Vista Rd — Light traffic, two lane, gates & signal, Residential, Intersection adjacent » Assessment: Vista Rd — Could use wayside horns or four- quadrant gates. Median does not work (Cost estimate $100,000 +) Review of Crossings - UP Page 2 of 3 Spo` ie Valley M-UP-1 & 2: Millwood » Marguerite, Light traffic, No gates or signal, Residential/Commercial, Intersection adjacent » Argonne: Heavy traffic, Four lane, Gates & signal, Business District, Intersection adjacent » Assessment: — Marguerite: Would need to be closed, or full new gate system added ($300,000+) — Argonne: Probably would need new four quadrant gate system ($500,000?) UP-3: Montgomery Drive — Light Traffic, three lane, gate & signal, Industrial/ Commercial » Assessment: Could be worked, but lower priority UP-4: E. Montgomery Drive — Moderate Traffic, two lane, gate & signal — Industrial /Commercial, Fire Station Driveway adjacent » Assessment: Could be worked, but lower priority Review of Crossings - UP Page 3 of 3 Spode eyr o UP-5: Pines Rd — Heavy traffic, Freeway access adjacent, four lane, gates & signal, Commercial » Assessment: Four quadrant gates needed, Difficult crossing/intersection, high cost QZ UP-6: Mirabeau Parkway Moderate traffic, four lane, gates & signal, intersection with Indiana, Commercial » Assessment: Four quadrant gates needed — Difficult crossing/intersection, high cost QZ UP-7: Flora Rd — Light traffic, two lane, gates & signal, Industrial Zone » Assessment: Easy to work with, but very low priority UP-8: Barker Rd — Moderate Traffic, two lane, gates & signal, intersection with Euclid adjacent — some residential » Possible candidate for QZ. Median doesn't work. Wayside horns (three direction) or four quadrant gates (Cost estimate $1 00,000 4+) Review of Crossings - BNSF Page 1 of 2 Slitikaile alley B-1 : Park Rd — Moderate traffic, Four lane, Existing Medians, Three Tracks, Two sets of signals & gates, Commercial & Residential, Trent intersection close » Possible QZ candidate using medians — would need further analysis, Has existing medians (Cost $50,000 +?) o B-2: Vista Rd — Light traffic, Two lane + turn, Two separated tracks, Two sets of signals & gates, Commercial & Residential, Trent intersection close » Possible QZ candidate using medians — would need further analysis, (Cost estimate $100,000 +?) B-3: University — Moderate Traffic, two lane, Median, Two separated tracks, Two sets of signals & gates, Residential, » Pre-existing Quiet Zone Note: For further analysis, these three intersections should be looked at together for the calculation of an average Risk Index and a possible single Quiet Zone Review of Crossings - NSF Page 2 of 2 Sp Iaae Vey° o B-4: Pines Rd — Heavy Traffic, four lane, gates & signal, Trent intersection adjacent, Commercial » Assessment: Some residential in area. Difficult crossing/intersection » Future grade separation candidate B-5: Evergreen Rd at Trent — Light traffic, two lane, gates & signal, Industrial, No residential Assessment: Could be worked, but lower priority B-6: Flora Rd at Trent — Light traffic, Trent intersection adjacent, two lane, gates & signal, Industrial, No residential D. Assessment: industrial, No residential — Low priority o B-7: Barker Rd at Trent — Heavy Traffic, Trent intersection adjacent, two lane, gates & signal, Primarily open industrial, some residential outside city to north » Assessment: Could be worked, but lower priority • Future grade separation candidate Potential Quet Zones/ Horns 0 s.'74,131 111111g 1111 IIMENZ NT, 'Allialglimmoi...01 A11011.1. RAIMMEIMIlitlitla so jar/ infa Ezimmitibt =t1 ratnmemitii 1 Mard1 4....11-4-e-A r• E za,..._ "Ap-- inuilmmums_in ''''P" EM-MM. Mlitar=19111111,.. .r , 4 ill lar-EM11911 REFINFM11. 1Faffi r..,=111 Lilialiki I IMENIMIES or. WEN EMEMIETIM XIIIPAIi.• MIEINIMITIMIEllgn= LIM II I c 12m W2A --- re r &ANIMISM- igt.A1•1' ormullINI-M=n1111E616:721.1EIMIIIINGEMTAMICIERMEMI Mn= musrm .03.1.4.9= =r49e=■ 1=11 ...MM=MLEM EEmmumici. 11 LINIM=11M111111 MI mil EN igE Surnmary ey Quiet zones are difficult & expensa ;. e Railroads don't encourage them 100% of cost is charged to local gove ¶o [mplemen• mment Cheapest QZ method (except for road closures use of medians with fully certified signals/gates Alternative to a full QZ is use of `Ways!de Horn' Recommendations Sfrokane Valleys Quiet Zone candidates are UP and BN crossings on Park and Vista Rds and the UP crossing at Barker Although we started out looking at the UP lines at Park and Vista, the BNSF crossings in the same area may be less costly and have much higher daily train traffic o Funding should be identified prior to significant design work o Four Quadrant gates are best solution for arterials near intersections, but cost over $300,000 per crossing o Professional assistance is mandatory if we are to proceed. Could consider a small consulting contract to do a preliminary analysis of the BNSF crossings at Park and Vista Chapter 18.10 PLANNING COMMISSION Sections: 18.10.010 Establishment and purpose. 18.10.020 Membership. 18.10.030 Meetings-- Rules. 18.10.040 Staff support. 18.10.050 Duties and responsibilities, 18.10.010 Establishment and purpose. There is created the City of Spokane Valley planning commission (hereafter referred to as the "planning commission"). The purpose of the planning commission is to study and make recommendations to the mayor and city council for future planned growth through continued review of the City's comprehensive land use plan, development regulations, shoreline management, environmental protection, public facilities, capital improvements and other matters as directed by the city council. (Ord. 07-015§ 4, 2007). 18.10.020 Membership. A. Qualifications. The membership of the planning commission shall consist of individuals who have an interest in planning, land use, transportation, capital infrastructure and building and landscape design as evidenced by training, experience or interest in the City. B. Appointment. Members of the planning commission shall be nominated by the mayor and confirmed by a majority vote of at least four members of the city council. Planning commissioners shall be selected without respect to political affiliations and shall serve without compensation. The mayor, when considering appointments, shall attempt to select residents who represent various interests and locations within the City. C. Number of Members/Terms. The planning commission shall consist of seven members. All members shall reside within the City. Terms shall be for a three-year period, and shall expire on the thirty-first day of December. D. Removal. Members of the planning commission may be removed by the mayor, with the concurrence of the city council, for neglect of duty, conflict of interest, malfeasance in office, or other just cause, or for unexcused absence from three consecutive regular meetings. Failure to qualify as to residency shall constitute a forfeiture of office. The decision of the city council regarding membership on the planning commission shall be final and without appeal. E. Vacancies. Vacancies that occur other than through the expiration of terms shall be filled for the unexpired term in the same manner as for appointments. F. Conflicts of Interest. Members of the planning commission shall fully comply with Chapter 42.23 RCW, Code of Ethics for Municipal Officers; Chapter 42.36 RCW, Appearance of Fairness; and such other rules and regulations as may be adopted from time to time by the city council regulating the conduct of any person holding appointive office within the City. No elected official or City employee may be a member of the planning commission. (Ord. 07-015§4, 2007). 18A0.030 Meetings e Rules. A. The planning commission shall every year organize and elect from its members a chair, who shall preside at all meetings of the planning commission and perform such other functions as determined by rule. A vice chair shall be elected to preside in the absence of the chair. A majority of the planning commission members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, and a majority vote of those present shall be necessary to carry any proposition. B. The planning commission shall determine a regular meeting schedule(time, place and frequency) and shall meet at least one time every month. All meetings shall be open to the public, C. The planning commission shall adopt such rules and procedures as are necessary for the conduct of business, subject to the approval of city council, and shall keep a recording of its proceedings. D. All hearings before the planning commission shall be conducted in the manner set forth in Appendix B. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 18.10.040 Staff support. Administrative staff support to the planning commission shall be provided by the City's community development department(hereafter referred to as the "department"). In addition, the planning commission, through its chair, may request formal opinions or memorandums from the city attorney or community development director(hereafter referred to as the"director") on any pending matter. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 18.10.050 Duties and responsibilities. The planning commission, as an advisory body to the city council, shall perform and have the following duties and responsibilities: A. Assist in the preparation of a Comprehensive Plan and development regulations in compliance with Chapters 35A.63 and 36.70A RCW, including the establishment of procedures for early and continuous public participation in the development and amendment of the Comprehensive Plan and the development regulations; B. Review plans and regulations related to land use management, shoreline management, environmental policy, transportation systems, public facilities and capital infrastructure planning and development; C. Upon request from the city manager or city council, review potential annexations to the City; D. Where design review is required by land use ordinances of the City, perform such design review unless that review is delegated to some other appointed body or City staff; E. Identify issues and recommend priorities for geographic subareas including park and open space areas in the City; F. Meet and confer with the hearing examiner to review the administration of land use policies and ordinances to enhance the planning and permitting process; G. Make periodic written and oral reports to the city council addressing work in progress and other significant matters relating to the City; H. Hold public hearings in the exercise of duties and responsibilities; I. Perform such other duties and powers as may be conferred by ordinance, resolution or motion of the city council. Unless otherwise assumed by the city council, the planning commission shall hold all public hearings required to be held in the course of adoption or amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, the development regulations, adoption or amendment of the zoning map, or adoption or amendment of regulations for the subdivision of land, shoreline management, environmental regulations, and other land use ordinances of the City. (Ord. 07-015 §4, 2007). Parks ttncroation Master Plan o What is a Master Plan? • Xn basic terms, the IvJastor Nan inventories existing park & recreation facilities, 3stablishes need based on citizen input and generally accepted standards and prioritizes future acquisition `-111 l development to m ()t: G:hose needs. o Document that provides an inclusive framework for orderly & consistent planning; acquisition; development; and administration of the parks and recreation resources, programs, and facilities o Consists of very specific information that serves as the frame or backbone of the parks & recreation department o Key areas of the specific information are developed in detail to serve as the framework of the master plan document o Advantages of a Parks & Recreation Master Plan © Order is brought to the decisions that are made concerning the future parks & recreation activities of the community o As community leadership changes, the master plan maintains consistency in the establishment of priorities and directions • Serves as the community statement concerning the planning of parks & recreation facilities, programs, and resources o Establishes statements and directions about what and how much, if any acquisition or development should occur o Allows for easier administration of parks & recreation particularly regarding long-range needs or desires o Enhances the community's ability to receive grant funds from state and federal agencies. Ve1NV3 0 c ,reation Master (Plan Lmposcmoa �.� • Provides detailed researched facts concerning the community and the role of parks & recreation • Establishes priorities and statements of direction based upon researched and documented facts • Engages the community in the planning process. Many times the process is as important as the plan itself o Provides direction for the community for five-to-ten years d Serves as a decision making document that allows decisions, problems, and questions to be determined in relationship to the plan o Can be used by all community decision makers, not just the barks & recreation department a Allows for consistency in planning o Wh : coniilined in our cw rJeni: Parks & Recreation Master Plan o Goals, policies, and objectives • Profile of Spokane Valley in the planning context of parks, recreation facilities, and programs O Inventory of existing parks and facilities • Parks & Recreation Areas • Facility Inventory 4 Recreation Demand Analysis • Design Guidelines • Analysis of existing operations Needs assessment which includes public surveys, etc, 2 Parks & Recreation Hi-Aster G iL-n ® Recommendations o Parkland, trails, management, maintenance, and recreation programs o Aquatic Facility Analysis o Implementation Strategies - o Next steps to update the Parks & Recrea :imii Master Plan o Hire design team to guide updating process o Solicit public input • Surveys o Community Meetings o Focus Groups o Update inventory of existing parks and facilities o Update will have an emphasis on: • Acquisition of parkland • Special facilities—pet parks; skate parks o Identifying future park property o Estimated tini un° Aron ph°40cess o Consultant hired by March 1, 201.2 o Analysis & development of draft plan including public input— March through June 2012 o City Council review of draft update--July 2012 E C 3 Parks & Recreation Master Plan Major Accomplishirrients of the Current Plan o Acquisition of Greenacres Park o Development of Greenacres Park o Development of Discovery Playground o Funding received as a result of the Master Plan a $306,175 towards the acquisition of Greenacres Park o $500,000 towards the development of Greenacres Park e $800,000 towards the development of Discovery Playground 4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 7, 2012 City Manager Approval: El Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Potential Park Property—Sprague Ave. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council received a presentation from Tim Hattenburg, Chairman, Spokane County Library Board at the January 10, 2012 Council Meeting; and, Council received an informational update in the January 31, 2011 Council packet. BACKGROUND: At the January 10, 2012 Regular Council Meeting, Mr. Hattenburg presented an overview of the Library Facilities Master Plan which was adopted by the Library Board of Trustees in 2010. The Library Plan was based on a Community Needs Assessment and is intended to guide short and long term library facility planning. The Plan also prioritizes improvements for the Library District. The Library Facilities Master Plan has identified the need to replace the existing Spokane Valley Library. The Spokane Library District (SOLD) has narrowed down the potential number of locations to four, with the top choice being 8+ acres currently listed for sale at Sprague and Herald. The property is owned by the Pring Corporation. The SCLD is unable to purchase the entire 8+ acres and they have proposed that the City of Spokane Valley and the SOLD discuss a joint purchase with the City utilizing a portion of the site for a City park. At the January 10 Council meeting, Council expressed interest in staff gathering information and starting a dialogue with SCLD about this potential joint purchase and coming back to Council to discuss. The City Manager has been meeting with SCLD staff and their representatives to discuss the general terms and conditions which would be required to complete the joint purchase of the property. Based on those meetings and what appears to be initial, mutual understanding of key terms and conditions, if/when Council decides to move forward with the acquisition, City and Library staff and their attorneys should be prepared to timely develop an Interlocal Agreement for consideration by the City Council and the Spokane County Library Board (barring any unforeseen circumstances). The City Council has approved in the 2012 Budget a revision of the Park and Recreation Master Plan. Additionally, there may be an opportunity for the City to leverage its funds to purchase the property through the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (WSROC) 2012 grant cycle. Staff will have some idea of this potential on January 31. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information Only BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City could utilize Fund #310 Civic Building Capital Projects Fund to purchase the property. This would require a budget amendment by City Council. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Jackson, City Manager CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 7, 2012 Department Director Approval: LEi Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Charitable solicitation in the rights-of-way GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 5.15 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption and subsequent amendments of SVMC 5.15 relating to special events permits. BACKGROUND: When the City adopted provisions for special events permits that allow charitable solicitation utilizing the roadway, there was only one known entity doing this, Muscular Dystrophy's Fill the Boot program. Recognizing that other groups may want to get such permits, the City put in requirements for obtaining at least one million dollars of insurance for each event, limiting to once per year per organization, requiring flagger training for any person entering the roadway, as well as other safety-based requirements. Since these provisions were adopted, the City has seen an increasing number of groups using the roadway for charitable solicitation. Staff wanted to take an opportunity to discuss this with the Council and determine if there was any course of action Council would like to pursue. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: NA BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney; Rick VanLeuven, Police Chief ATTACHMENTS: SVMC 5.15 Chapter 5.15 SPECIAL EVENTS Sections: 5.15.010 Definitions. 5.15.020 Permit— Required. 5.15.030 Permit—Application —Fee. 5.15.035 Permit— Exceptions. 5,15.040 Permit—Application—Contents. 5.15.050 Permit—Application —Filing. 5.15.060 Bond required. 5.15.070 Insurance required--Hold harmless/indemnification. 5.15.080 Permit— Issuance standards. 5.15.090 Traffic control. 5.15.100 Appeal procedure. 5.15.110 Permit revocation or suspension. 5.15.120 Rules and policy. 5.15.130 Violation— Penalty. 5.15.010 Definitions. A. "Applicant" means the person, firm or entity making application for a permit. . B. "City manager' shall mean the city manager or his/her designee. C. "Parade" means any march or procession consisting of people, animals, bicycles, vehicles, or combination thereof, except wedding processions and funeral processions, upon any public street or sidewalk which does not comply with adopted traffic regulations or controls. D. "Run" means an organized procession or race consisting of people, bicycles, or other vehicular devices or combination thereof upon the public street or sidewalk. E. "Public property" means a street or other public place (i.e., park) under the control and authority of the City. F. "Private event" means an event which uses public property for the purpose of monetary or personal gain by any person, partnership, group, organization, company or corporation or which is closed to the general public. G. "Special event" means: 1. Any activity of a temporary nature on public property which affects the ordinary use of public rights-of-way, public parking lots, public parks, intersections, sidewalks or streets, or which would significantly impact the need for City-provided emergency services such as police, fire or medical aid, for purposes which include, but are not limited to, parades, walks/runs, street dances, fundraisers, sales, auctions, bikeathons, shows or exhibitions, filming/movie events, carnivals, circuses, car shows, horse shows, fairs and block parties, or other activity, demonstration or exhibition; or 2.. Any activity, function, or event, which is open to the general public, where 200 or more people are estimated to attend; or 3. A private event. H. "Street" or"streets" means any public roadway, sidewalk, or portions thereof in the City of Spokane Valley dedicated to the public use. I. "Street dance" means any organized dance on any public street, public sidewalk or publicly owned parking lot. (Ord. 09-038 § 1, 2009; Ord. 08-013 § 2, 2008; Ord. 05-023 § 1, 2005; Ord. 04-028 § 1, 2004; Ord. 64 § 1, 2003). 5.15.020 Permit— Required. No person shall conduct a special event upon public property unless a permit has been obtained from the parks and recreation director. (Ord. 08-013§ 2, 2008; Ord. 05-023§ 1, 2005; Ord. 64 §2, 2003). 5.15.030 Permit—Application Fee. The fee for a special event shall be determined by resolution. (Ord. 08-013§2, 2008; Ord. 05-023§ 1, 2005; Ord. 64§ 3, 2003). 5.15.035 Permit--Exceptions. The following activities are exempt from the requirement to obtain a special events permit, although such activities must still comply with all other applicable laws: A A funeral procession by a licensed mortuary; B, Activities conducted by a governmental agency acting within the scope of its authority; and C. Lawful picketing on sidewalks. (Ord. 08-013 § 2, 2008). 5.15.040 Permit—Application—Contents. The application for a special event permit shall include the following: A. The name, address, and telephone number of the applicant and any event organizer, if different than the applicant; B. A certification that the applicant will be financially responsible for any City fees or costs that may be imposed for the special event, including the posting of the bond required in SVMC 5.15,060, and compliance with the insurance requirements in SVMC 5.15.070; C.A certification that the applicant will comply with the hold harmless and indemnification provisions in SVMC 5.15.070; D. If the special event is designed to be held by, on behalf of, or for any organization other than the applicant, the applicant for the special event permit shall file a written communication from such organization: 1. Authorizing the applicant to apply for the special event permit on its behalf; 2. Certifying that the applicant will be financially responsible for any costs or fees that may be imposed for the special event; 3. A copy of the tax exemption letter issued for any applicant claiming to be a tax-exempt nonprofit organization; E. A statement of the purpose of the special event; F. The proposed location for the special event; G. Dates and times when the special event is to be conducted; H. The approximate times when assembly for, and disbanding of, the special event is to take place; I. The proposed locations of the assembly or production area; J. The specific proposed site or route, including a map and written narrative of the route; K. The proposed site of any reviewing stands; L. The proposed site for any disbanding area; M. Proposed alternate routes, sites or times, where applicable; N. The approximate number of persons, animals or vehicles that will constitute the special event; 0. The kinds of animals anticipated to be part of the special event; P. A description of the types of vehicles to be used in the special event; Q. The number of bands or other musical units and the nature of any equipment to be used to produce sounds or noise; R. The number and location of portable sanitation facilities; S. Other equipment or services necessary to conduct the special event with due regard for participant and public health and safety; T. The number of persons proposed or required to monitor or facilitate the special event and provide spectator or participant control and direction for special events using City streets, sidewalks, or facilities; U. Provisions for first aid or emergency medical services, or both, based on special event risk factors; V. Insurance and surety bond information; W. Any special or unusual requirements that may be imposed or created by virtue of the proposed special event activity; and X. Any other information required by the parks and recreation director. (Ord. 08-013§ 2, 2008; Ord. 05- 023 § 1, 2005; Ord. 64 §4, 2003). 5.15.050 Permit—Application —Filing. A completed application for a special event permit shall be filed with the parks and recreation director at least four weeks before the date on which the event will occur. The parks and recreation director shall notify the applicant of approval or disapproval. (Ord. 09-038 § 1, 2009; Ord. 08-013§ 2, 2008; Ord. 05- 023 § 1, 2005; Ord. 64 § 5, 2003). 5,15.060 Bond required. The parks and recreation director may require a cash deposit or performance bond as a guarantee that the public property will be cleaned and returned to the condition in which it was found. The amount shall not be less than $50.00 and no more than $1,000. The parks and recreation director shall determine the amount of bond or deposit by considering type of event, projected number of participants and spectators, and the sponsor's experience. For an event where clean-up or other potential expenses would likely exceed $1,000, the parks and recreation director shall refer the matter to the city council for consideration. (Ord. 08-013 §2, 2008; Ord. 05-023 § 1, 2005; Ord. 64 § 6, 2003). 5.15.070 Insurance required—Hold harmless/indemnification. A. The applicant shall provide the City with a declaration page demonstrating proof of liability insurance with a combined single limit of$1,000,000 per occurrence, and $2,000,000 in aggregate or such other amounts as may be established by the City's insurance carrier. Evidence of insurance shall be filed with the application and shall name the City of Spokane Valley as an additional named insured. Depending upon the nature of the special event and its risk to the public and private individuals, the parks and recreation director may increase or reduce the liability limits for a given event after consultation with the City's insurance carrier. B. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, suits, actions, or liabilities for injury or death of any person, or for loss or damage to property, which arises out of the applicant's event, or from any activity, work or thing done, permitted, or suffered by applicant which arises from the applicant's event, except only such injury or damage as shall have been occasioned by the sole negligence of the City. (Ord. 08- 013 § 2, 2008; Ord. 05-023 § 1, 2005; Ord. 64§ 7, 2003). 5.15.080 Permit—Issuance standards. The parks and recreation director shall not issue a special event permit if: A. The time route, or size of the event will unreasonably disrupt the movement of traffic along streets; B. The size or nature of the event requires supervision by a significant number of police officers that causes unreasonable expense or diversion of police duties; C. The applicant has failed to remit all fees, documents, or proof of bonds; D. The applicant has failed to conduct a previously authorized special event in accordance with law or the terms of a permit, or both; E. The police department or City traffic engineer fails to sign the permit due to traffic or other safety concerns; F. The applicant has failed to provide sufficient safety, health or sanitation equipment services, or facilities; G. The applicant has not provided sufficient off-site parking or shuttle service, or both, when required to minimize substantial adverse impacts on general parking and traffic circulation caused by the event; H. The special event will substantially interfere with any other special event for which a permit has already been granted or with the provision of City services in support of other scheduled special events or governmental functions; I. The special event would block traffic lanes or close streets during peak commuter hours on weekdays between 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. on streets designated as arterials by the City's public works department; J. Any of the following provisions for charitable solicitation in the rights-of-way occur: 1. The applicant or organization represented by the applicant has been granted a special event permit by the City to engage in charitable solicitation in the City rights-of-way within the preceding 12 months; 2. The applicant has failed to provide sufficient documentation to demonstrate that all persons who will be entering the roadway in any manner related to the event have successfully completed the Spokane County Incident Traffic Control Program or its equivalent, including Washington State Department of Transportation Flagger Certification, and that certification is current; or 3. The applicant has failed to provide sufficient documentation to demonstrate that all persons who will be entering into the roadway in any manner related to the event are at least 18 years of age on the day of the event. (Ord. 10-024 § 2, 2010; Ord. 08-013 § 2, 2008; Ord. 05-023§ 1, 2005; Ord. 64 § 8, 2003). 5.15.090 Traffic control. The parks and recreation director may require any reasonable and necessary traffic control with the applicant responsible for the expense. The parks and recreation director shall notify the applicant of any City-projected traffic control expense and collect this amount before a permit is issued. (Ord. 08-013§ 2, 2008; Ord. 05-023 § 1, 2005; Ord. 64§ 9, 2003). 5.15.100 Appeal procedure. Upon denial of a permit by the parks and recreation director, an applicant may appeal to the city council by filing a written notice of the appeal within 10 days from the parks and recreation director's decision. Upon such appeal, the city council may reverse, affirm, or modify the parks and recreation director's determination. (Ord. 08-013 § 2, 2008; Ord. 05-023 § 1, 2005; Ord. 64 § 10, 2003). 5.15.110 Permit revocation or suspension. The special event permit issued under this chapter is temporary and vests no permanent rights in the applicant, and may be immediately revoked or suspended by the parks and recreation director if: A. The applicant has made a misstatement of material fact in the information supplied; B. The applicant has failed to fulfill a term or condition of the permit in a timely manner; C. The applicant requests the cancellation of the permit or cancels the event; D. The activity endangers or threatens persons or property, or otherwise jeopardizes the health, safety or welfare of persons or property; B. The activity conducted is in violation of any of the terms or conditions of the special event permit; F. An emergency or occurrence requires the cancellation or termination of the event in order to protect the public health or safety; or G. The applicant fails to prepay expenses. The City shall refund the permit fee in the event of revocation caused by an emergency or supervening occurrence.All other refunds shall be at the discretion of the parks and recreation director. (Ord. 08-013 §2, 2008; Ord. 05-023 § 1, 2005; Ord. 64 § 11, 2003). 5.15.120 Rules and policy. To implement the special event permit, the parks and recreation director may develop and adopt rules, policies and forms consistent with this chapter. All adopted rules, policies and forms shall be filed with the city clerk. (Ord. 08-013 §2, 2008; Ord. 05-023 § 1, 2005; Ord. 64 § 12, 2003). 5.15.130 Violation — Penalty. Violation of this chapter is a class 1 civil infraction. (Ord. 08-013§ 2, 2008; Ord. 05-023§ 1, 2005; Ord. 64 § 13, 2003). 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 1/31/2012 2012 Budget Potential Capital Projects Discussed at Estimated 6/14/2011 Project Description Cost Council Retreat IOne-Time Cost 1 Mission Avenue Trailhead 150,000 yes Railroad Quiet Zones 1,500,000 yes Appleway Landscaping - Park to University 640,000 yes Old Milwaukee Trail 3,500,000 (1) no University/Appleway Landscaping 100,000 yes Sullivan Street Bridge-estimated City share?? 2,000,000 no Animal Shelter 900,000 170 Potential park land acquisition (net of$500,000 from Library) 2,000,000 no Permit Center move 200,000 no Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail (complete project) 860,000 no (or phase 1 - Community College to Argonne and Millwood for$430,000) Solid Waste ??? no 11,850,000 Annual Cost Street Preservation -Arterials 6,000,000 yes Street Preservation - Local 3,000,000 yes 9,000,000 (1) Cost of Old Milwaukee Trail is based on the cost per mile for the Spokane Valley/Millwood and Greenacres frail projects. Cost may vary according to the type of surfacing. . I CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY City Council Retreat Meeting Date: February 7, 2012 Department Director Approval: • Check all that apply: El consent ❑old business ❑ new business ['public hearing ❑ information ?C admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Ending Fund Balance--General Fund. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: None. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Included in the 2012 Budget adopted by the Council on November 15, 2011 is a statement that the City will pursue an ending general fund balance of no less than 15% of revenue. An additional policy of the City is that 40% of the General Fund ending fund balance in excess of $26 million will be transferred to Fund #311 Street Capital Improvements 2011+. BACKGROUND: Periodically the topic of the fund balance in the General Fund is discussed. Items to consider in this discussion might include: • Minimums needed for cash flow. • Minimums needed for ongoing operations. • Amounts to set aside for future capital projects. • Goal balances 5 and 10 years into the future. • Etc. OPTIONS: This is a discussion topic and requires that no decisions be made at this time. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: No action is required at this time. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None at this time. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Jackson/Mark Calhoun ATTACHMENTS: None. C:lOocuments and SettingslmrasmussenlLocal Settings{Temporary Internet Fil estContent.OutlooktZSBJ119L12011 02 07 Retreat-Ending FB (3).docx