Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2012, 03-20 Study Session
AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION FORMAT Tuesday,March 20, 2012 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11707 East Sprague Avenue,First Floor (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL 1.John Hohman; and Greater Spokane,Inc. (GSI)Update Discussion/Information Rich Hadley,GSI CEO and President;and Robin Toth, GSI VP for Business Development 2.Henry Allen H2O Conference Update Discussion/Information 3. Steve Worley Draft Amended 2012 Transportation Discussion/Information Improvement Plan(TIP) 4. Steve Worley Union Pacific Railroad Agreement Discussion/Information For Pines Road Crossing Improvements 5. Steve Worley Spokane Transit Authority(STA)Agreement Discussion/Information Sidewalk and Transit Accessibility Proj ect#0154 6. Steve Worley Safe Routes to School,Call for Projects Discussion/Information 7.Neil Kersten Pavement Management Plan Discussion/Information 8.Morgan Koudelka Animal Control Discussion/Information 9.Mike Jackson,John Economic Development Committee Discussion/Information Hohman 10.Mayor Towey Advance Agenda Discussion/Information 11.Mayor Towey Council Check-in Discussion/Information 12.Mike Jackson City Manager Comments Discussion/Information ADJOURN Note: Unless otherwise noted above, there will be no public comments at Council Study Sessions. However, Council always reserves the right to request information from the public and staff as appropriate. During meetings held by the City of Spokane Valley Council,the Council reserves the right to take"action"on any item listed or subsequently added to the agenda. The term"action" means to deliberate,discuss,review,consider,evaluate,or make a collective positive or negative decision. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments,please contact the City Clerk at(509)921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Study Session Agenda,March 20,2012 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 20, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business [' new business [' public hearing [' information ® admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Greater Spokane, Inc. Annual Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: none BACKGROUND: City Community Development Director John Hohman will introduce GSI President and CEO Rich Hadley, and GSI Vice President for Business Development Robin Toth, who will give an update on GSI's "Growing Jobs and Business Investments." OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman ATTACHMENTS: Growing Jobs & Business Investment City of Spokane Valley Spokane �Valleyk March 20, 2012 Rich Hadley, President & CEO Robin Toth, VP Business Development greaterspokane.org } create something greater Growing jobs and business investment L GSI Economic and Business Development Services: • Business recruitment • Assistance with business expansion and retention • Cost comparisons and business operating costs • Corporate tax incentives and financing options • Real estate and site selection • Employee relocation assistance • Familiarization tours of the Spokane region • Workforce hiring and training options • Business planning and training • Connections to resources and economic development partners • Government contracting assistance through GSI's PTAC office greaterspokane.org create someth ng greater J Growing jobs and business investment Spokane L GSI provides advantages • Strong partnership with economic development agencies • US Economic Development Administration • State Department of Commerce • WorkSource Spokane • Washington Economic Development Association • Inland Northwest Economic Alliance • Aerospace Futures Alliance, INWAC • Washington Clean Tech Alliance, CLEENINW greaterspokane.org create someth ng greater J Growing jobs and business investment Spokane L Collaboration results in "greater bang for the buck" • Power in advocacy for transportation, business regulations and incentives, higher education • Teaming on trade shows and sales missions • Increased advertising dollars, greater lead generation • Affordability of larger databases — Salesforce, Hoovers, Siteselector, IMPLAN • Shared grant opportunities • Certified Sites, IPZ for University District, National Cost of Living data, SelectSpokane.com, Port District • Public perception as highly collaborative and integrated region greaterspokane.org create someth ng greater Growing jobs and business investment Spokane L New 2012 Projects • Relaunch improved www.selectspokane.com • Certified Sites • Port District • Advertising - iSpokane greaterspokane.org create someth ng greater Growing jobs and business investment Spokane www.selectspokane.com • 370 Spokane Valley properties currently listed on website • New features include • One-click demographics • Client defined business clusters • Enhanced business search • Mobile application ineim1111.4fnger.1ri.ewd Inlarn Isrplar F. Fri ,ew F. T, abp ..» .. •t�.,m„� . f..•Salm.awnvim,,u...1A4nR.vwMAC..= ri•m . -'* '++hl.- a*• SPOKANE SITE REGIONAL SELECTOR PROPf r UM RICKS Nd RRET 1.1.,.119.1110 ,P ovate al closua n m arm uladm i surd,Pr9pus4, Im WT.TFLe �R[e 6IYy rdea.0?Wry Manacle Min, MPL Fkmo I Oolce Pk .We .S11Proalhoc I,Ld[I NJR ®Ibsen, Ore,.`J'W....W.rr.a 0ew. „e.FFNI. /.. ham In {l dr •I.. L•mn w bm.e.•SOO 4 A4pplrP ,. dtltl LLx, 11 nu C3nveaesl rNa C3emrrtl..tiv�... er wu dmrew. ▪ .tl Pn.ew • p 4 ear F'..:...,y • Google StreetView • Sketch, Measure and Label on map • Additional broker information • Enhanced map quality with multiple base map options • Possibility of advertisements/sponsorships Spy greaterspokane.org create someth ng greater Growing jobs and business investment L Certified Sites • GSI is working with the Airport, County, and City of Spokane on shovel ready sites on the West Plains for Aerospace and Distribution • City of Spokane Valley is working on shovel-ready sites with one of their local developers — should be included as part of this program • City of Cheney has submitted their Research Park for certification • A new prospect on a County site is also looking to develop a binding site plan that could integrate with this program • Good response from our partners • A national firm may partner with us on the certification process greaterspokane.org create someth ng greater Growing jobs and business investment L Port District • A port district is a special purpose district with an economic development and transportation mission • 75 port districts exist in Washington state in most counties except Spokane and Yakima • Ports operate marinas, docks, airports, railroads, industrial sites, recreational facilities • A port for Spokane County was last placed on the ballot in 1984 — lost by a margin of 4 to 1 • Competing counties are winning large projects due to their ability to raise funds for infrastructure and buildings • Funds include service charges, lease and rental fees, grants, gifts, bonds and levies greaterspokane.org create someth ng greater Growing jobs and business investment Port District Next Steps L • Visits to selected Eastern Washington ports • Two day trip to Port of Benton, Port of Walla Walla or Port of Moses Lake • Develop joint message points • Begin education and awareness program • Port of Spokane would serve the entire County, providing funding for projects in both unincorporated and incorporated areas greaterspokane.org create someth ng greater Growing jobs and business investment Advertising & Publications • iSpokane. . . invite — inspire — innovate Using QR code and tracking views to new microsite ispokane.biz • Alaska Airlines Magazine featuring Spokane • On flights February 2012 • Mailed to site selectors • 2012 Journal of Business Magazine iSpokane invite I inspire I innovate • Distributed with April 12th Journal and mailed to site selectors nationally • Last year's magazine, Positioned for Growth, included City of Spokane Valley page and won an IEDC award iSpokane twit& nspire • inn o4-1€ W greaterspokane.org create someth ng greater Growing jobs and business investment da L GSI Assisted Spokane Valley Projects in 2011 • American Tire Distributors • Showed sites in Spokane Valley; introduced them to management at the Spokane Business & Industrial Park • Currently constructing a 110,000 SF distribution facility in the Park • American Tire expects to employ 30 to 35 workers at that facility • Py rote k • Worked with them to bring a production line from Mexico to Spokane Valley • Now leasing space in the Industrial Park • The company considered locations in PA, TN, NY & ID • This line will employ 20 to 30 workers greaterspokane.org create something greater Growing jobs and business investment L Current Spokane Valley Projects in Process • Projects in Process • Showed Spokane Valley sites to a small company out of California which manufactures electronic components and would employ approximately 6 people to start • Working with a Spokane Valley Manufacturing Company on accessing state incentive for expansion; 23,000 sq ft new construction, 40 new jobs • Obtained Governor's Strategic Reserve Funding to retain a distribution company with a Spokane Valley presence looking at relocating to Post Falls — 80,000 sf, retention of 94 jobs and recruitment of 34 new jobs • Large, green industrial project in Clean Tech sector, foreign company bringing millions of dollars of equity • Support includes site selection, financing options, networking and logistics • Two potential sites have been identified — Spokane Valley and Wyoming • New generation commercial lighting — second venture between an established Spokane Valley company and a recruited company • Support includes networking, site selection, contract manufacturing, legal services, potential investors, employee relocation assistance • Inbound call from site selector representing specialty clothing chain • Looking for 10,000 sq ft with high visibility - prefer the Spokane Valley • Visit / tour scheduled for next week greaterspokane.org create something greater J Growing jobs and business investment 3 Retention and Expansion Wins in 2011 for Spokane Valley American Tire Distributors in Spokane Valley • 20 jobs; Annual payroll $470,000 • $7,000,000 Construction project Pyrotek in Spokane Valley • 20 jobs; Annual payroll = $750,000 Ecolite Manufacturing in Spokane Valley • 10 jobs; Annual payroll $380,640 1 Recruitment Win in 2011 for Spokane Valley Global Future Energy Holdings, Inc. in Spokane Valley • 3 jobs; Annual payroll $180,000 RESULT: Spokane Valley's annual tax revenue increases by $230, 187 (ROI of $51, 000 grant to GSI for economic development) "705/1773 n,.e,F.*..&,and W oFe Fog nJwa! P!jrotek� � . for 5o gears 0956-20o6) litE Global Future Energy Global Fu[Ure Energy HOW IngS,Inc.an AGEHH Company greaterspokane.org create something greater Growing jobs and business investment L Spokane Valley's ROI - Funding Economic Development through GSI Year 2010 SV investment GSI assisted wins in SV Jobs created $60,000 2011 $51 ,000 4 2012 $41 ,500 6 329 Added SV tax revenue $387,404 53 $230, 187 greaterspokane.org create someth ng greater Growing jobs and business investment L Discussion points for 2012 • Spokane Valley economic development plan • Branding Spokane Valley • Infrastructure • Business friendly code • Permitting • Site certification greaterspokane.org create someth ng greater Growing jobs and business investment CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 20, 2012 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Recap of"H20 Breakfast" concerning regional water collaboration GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N.A. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: On February 9, 2012 a breakfast meeting was held in Coeur d'Alene to initiate public awareness concerning regional water collaboration. The key speaker was Pat Mulroy who is the General Manager of the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA). Staff will present a recap of items recalled from the event. OPTIONS: N.A. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N.A. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Henry Allen/Development Engineer ATTACHMENTS: Breakfast Perspectives on Regional Water Collaboration of February 9 , 2012 meeting In Coeur d 'Alene, Idaho 1 onal Interest for Meeting 1 . Seattle, WA Lots of precipitation, several reservoirs (Tolt R & Cedar R) Water use restrictions in 1987 and 1992 Has water supply concerns Phoenix, AZ; worked around Southwest U .S. Southwest has continuous concerns about water supply Portland, OR Lots of precipitation, several reservoirs (Bull Run Watershed) Has water supply concerns 4. Spokane Valley, WA • "No water shortage here, we got a river running under us" - WOW! . .. Really? ... Never heard that. Fathdrum Prairie Incorporated Areas AuliIns U 3 6 Lake Pend Oreille Lr'herti,• From Alan Miller's (Hayden Lake Irrigation District) presentation at 2011 Spokane River Conference 3 Spokane Valley/Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer Arrows : Black = Inflow, Blue = through-flow Guest Speaker - Pat Mulroy • • is TY . A - . - 1922 - Colorado River Compact Created upper (WY CO UT NM) and lower (NV A A) basins in Colorado River watershed • Each basin allocated 7.5 M ac-ft (32 billion bathtubs) annually • 1928 - allocations officially determined • Since no one in southern NV at that time they got only go 4% of water. • Developed into Metropolitan Area: Las Vegas, North Las Vegas, Henderson, Boulder City 1989 — lots of development and over-committed water supplies Philosophy was use it or CA will take it • Started looking regionally for other groundwater water supplies • 1991 - created Southern Nevada Water Authority - SNWA • Realized that all the communities were very interconnected and needed to work together so tossed priority water rights and pooled resources. All work together, under same criteria. 5 Pat Mulroy, Continued • 2000 - had a firm 50- ear water supp • Assumed Colorado River was healthy, BuRec said zero probability of the current drought happening That year saw less than normal inflow from Colorado River (56% of normal) • 2001 - again, less than normal inflow • 2002 - only 25% of normal flow . . . problems. What was a big clue that there were problems? Lake Mead Bathtub Ring ■ Pat Mulro - tinned • 2002 - all surplus and dependable 5o-year water supply was gone • Communities put together a shared shortage and drought plan • Biggest water user was residential lawns so paid people to remove lawns and set up watering schedules = cut water use by 1/3 The fear of running out of water created brutally-ugly negotiations "There is nothing more compelling than the fear of running out of water" (Pat M., 2007) As long as you can point to solutions you can tell people there is a water problem. • Communities need to work not independently but inter- dependently Panel Discussion -in E • Ted Sturdevant, Dr ctor of Washingtorjapepartment of Ecology and Gary Spackman, Interim Director of the Idaho Water Resources Department. • Idaho is actively adjudicating water rights within the SVRP basin. Washington is not, primarily because the legislature has not funded it. Welcome to Spokane .000Valley _.•r .. ;, 10 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 20, 2012 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Draft Amended 2012 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: July 20, 2010 Adopted 2012-2017 Six Year TIP on June 28, 2011, Resolution #11-005; Approved Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) 2011 Call for Project applications on August 9, 2011; Approved Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) applications on October 25, 2011; Approved proceeding with Evergreen Rd Preservation Project — 16th to 32nd on February 7, 2012; Info RCA in Council's March 6, 2012 packet. BACKGROUND: Council adopted the 2012-2017 TIP based upon information staff had at that time relative to available funds and how these funds could be utilized for transportation projects. Since the adoption of the 2012-2017 TIP, staff submitted applications for a Transportation Improvement Board Call for Projects and a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) for the following projects that were selected for funding: • Sprague Avenue Reconstruction #2 — Evergreen Rd to Sullivan Rd (TIB) • Sprague Avenue ADA ramps — Fancher Rd to Havana Street (CDBG) — pending approval from Spokane County • Wellesley Ave Sidewalk — Sullivan Rd to 150-ft east of lsenhart Rd and Adams Rd Sidewalk - Wellesley Ave. to Trent Ave (SR290) Additional proposed changes identified in the Amended 2012 TIP include the following: Carryover projects from 2011: • Pines/Mansfield (Railroad Crossing Improvements) • Sullivan/Euclid PCC Intersection • Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan PCC Intersections • Green Haven STEP Paveback project Other projects approved by Council: • Sullivan Rd Bridge Drain Retrofit • Sullivan Bridge Temporary repairs • Evergreen Road Rehabilitation — 16th Ave to 32nd Ave Based on this information, it is recommended that the 2012 TIP be amended to reflect the deletion of the projects that did not receive funding, include those projects that were not completed in 2011 and have been carried over to the 2012 construction season, and those projects added to the 2012 construction season. Attached is a summary of the proposed changes. A public hearing on these changes to the 2012 TIP is currently scheduled for March 27, 2012. Adoption of the Amended 2012 TIP is currently scheduled for March 27, 2012. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The projects costs shown in the draft Amended 2012 TIP are preliminary and will be adjusted prior to adoption to reflect 2011 year-end adjustments. There are sufficient capital project funds in the 2012 budget to cover the local match for these projects. STAFF CONTACT: Steve Worley, Senior Capital Projects Engineer Neil Kersten, Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Draft Amended 2012 TIP City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Adopted 2012 Transportation Improvement Program Primary City Total 2012 Proj.# Project From To Source Amount Project Costs 1 0060 Argonne Road Corridor Improvements 1-90 Trent CMAQ $ 79,000 $ 582,000 2 0061 Pines Corridor ITS Sprague Trent CMAQ $ 238,000 $ 1,775,000 3 0069 Park Road Project 2(RW/CN Only) Broadway Indiana STP(U) $ 20,000 $ 150,000 4 0115 Sprague Reconstruction#2 Evergreen Sullivan STP(P) $ 188,000 $ 1,394,000 5 0123 Mission Ave Improvement Project(PE/RW Only) Flora Barker STP(U) $ 96,000 $ 711,000 6 0133 Sprague/Sullivan ITS McDonald/Sprague Sullivan/l-90 CMAQ $ 34,000 $ 253,000 7 0145 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail(PE Only) SCC Valley Mall STP(E) $ - $ 372,000 8 0146 24th Avenue Sidewalk Project Adams Sullivan TIB-USP $ 132,000 $ 258,000 9 0148 Greenacres Trail(PE Only) Sullivan Hodges EECBG $ - $ 50,000 10 0149 Sidewalk Infill Project Various locations CMAQ $ 108,000 $ 539,000 11 0154 Sidewalk&Transit Stop Accessibility Various locations FTA $ 63,000 $ 315,000 12 0155 Sullivan West Bridge#4508 Sullivan @Spokane River BR $ 226,000 $ 1,128,000 13 0156 Mansfield Ave Connection Project(PE/RW Only) Pines(SR 27) Houk St. CMAQ $ 100,000 $ 738,000 14 0160 University Rd/l-90 Overpass Study University 1-90 CMAQ $ 34,000 $ 250,000 15 Broadway Ave Improvements Flora Barker TIB-UCP $ 151,000 $ 755,000 16 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study 1-90 Wellesley STP(U) $ 27,000 $ 200,000 17 Sullivan Rd/UPRR Overpass Bridge Resurfacing Sullivan @UPRR Overpass BR $ 149,000 $ 746,000 $ 1,645,000 $ 10,216,000 Funded Projects Added Projects Planned Projects City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works DRAFT AMENDED 2012 Transportation Improvement Program Resolution 12-xxx,(Date) Primary City Total 2012 Proj.# Project From To Source Amount Project Costs 1 0005 Pines/Mansfield Montgomery Pines(SR-27) City-303 $ 463,000 $ 463,000 2 0060 Argonne Road Corridor Improvements 1-90 Trent CMAQ $ 145,000 $ 1,100,000 3 0061 Pines Corridor ITS Sprague Trent CMAQ $ 250,000 $ 1,850,000 4 0115 Sprague Reconstruction#2 Evergreen Sullivan TIB $ 858,000 $ 3,878,000 5 0123 Mission Ave Improvement Project(PE/RW Only) Flora Barker STP(U) $ 96,000 $ 711,000 6 0133 Sprague/Sullivan ITS Sprague Sullivan/l-90 CMAQ $ 104,000 $ 456,000 7 0141 Sullivan/Euclid PCC Intersection(PE/RW only) Sullivan Euclid STP(U) $ 5,000 $ 40,000 8 0142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan PCC Intersections(PE/RW only) Broadway @Argonne/Mullan STP(U) $ 37,300 $ 276,300 9 0145 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail(PE Only) SCC Valley Mall STP(E) $ - $ 500,000 10 0146 24th Avenue Sidewalk Project Adams Sullivan TIB-USP $ 132,000 $ 258,000 11 0148 Greenacres Trail(PE Only)* Sullivan Hodges EECBG $ - $ 48,000 12 0149 Sidewalk Infill Project Various locations CMAQ $ 108,000 $ 539,000 13 0150 Sullivan Bridge Drain Retrofit Sullivan Bridge southbound DOE $ 79,100 $ 316,500 14 0151 STEP Paveback-Green Haven project Various locations City-310 $ 118,000 $ 118,000 15 0154 Sidewalk&Transit Stop Accessibility Various locations FTA $ 37,000 $ 215,000 16 0155 Sullivan West Bridge#4508 Sullivan @Spokane River BR $ 226,000 $ 1,128,000 17 0156 Mansfield Ave Connection Project(PE/RW Only) Pines(SR 27) Houk St. CMAQ $ 100,000 $ 738,000 18 0157 Sullivan Bridge Temporary Repairs Sullivan Bridge southbound City-311 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 19 0159 University Rd/l-90 Overpass Study University 1-90 CMAQ $ 34,000 $ 250,000 20 0160 Evergreen Road Rehabilitation 16th 32nd City-101 $ 611,000 $ 998,951 21 Sprague Avenue curb ramps Fancher Havana CDBG $ - $ 115,410 22 Wellesley Ave/Adams Rd.Sidewalk project Sullivan/Trent Isenhart/Wellesley SRTS $ 30,000 $ 691,000 $ 3,603,400 $ 14,890,161 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Funded Projects Added Projects 2011 Carry Over Projects "May be delayed pending ROW issues. C:\Documents and Settings\sworley\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\YTQXEHVP\Draft Amended 2012 TIP.xlsx 3/14/2012 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 20, 2012 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: UPRR Agreement— Pines/Mansfield Project #0005 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.35.010 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 1) Approval of previous Six Year Transportation Improvement Programs, which included the Pines/Mansfield project, 2) approval of application for federal grant funding for the Pines/Mansfield Project, 3) approval of Fuel Tax Grant Distribution Agreement with the TIB for the Pines/Mansfield project; 4) approval of a quit-claim deed on one parcel to complete right-of-way acquisition; 5) informational memo in June 3, 2008 Council Packets; 6) award of construction contract to Inland Asphalt on June 24, 2008; 7) Additional Change Order Authority for City Manager, June 2, 2009; 8) admin report and presentation to Council on Change Order #36 and #37, December 8, 2009; 9) Adopted the Amended 2011 TIP, which included the Pines/Mansfield project; 10) Informational RCA on UPRR Agreement in council's March 13, 2012 packet. BACKGROUND: The City and Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) are successors to a June 30, 1977 agreement under which UPRR is responsible to operate and maintain the warning devises at the Pines Road crossing, and the City is responsible to pay for alterations to the existing warning devices necessitated by any future road improvements. As part of the Pines/Mansfield project, staff has been working with the UPRR to make improvements the Pines Road crossing to accommodate the widening of Pines Road and to provide a sidewalk for safe pedestrian crossings. The widening of Pines Road was for a southbound right turn lane onto westbound Montgomery Avenue. In accordance with RCW 81.53.261 the city filed a petition for these railroad crossing improvements with the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC). The railroad crossing improvements will include relocating the existing cantilever (the structure with the overhead flashing red lights) and the crossing arm on the west side of Pines Road, installing a new crossing arm in the center median for southbound traffic, and other associated work. Under RCW 81.53.261 the City and UPRR may "enter into an agreement . . . providing for the installation of signals or other warning devices . . . or for the apportionment of the cost of installation and maintenance thereof." RCW 81.53.130 also provides that the UTC has authority to apportion costs of railroad crossing improvements as "the parties may agree, or as the [UTC] may consider advisable." Under the June 30 1977 agreement the City is responsible for alterations to the existing warning devices necessitated by the City's improvements to the roadway. Staff and UPRR have reached a tentative agreement on the improvements to the warning devices at the Pines Road crossing for which the City will be responsible. A summary of the main terms of the agreement are as follows: 1. UPRR will perform the work listed on the attached estimate dated 2011-11-02 and shown on the included drawing 2. The estimated cost for this work is $236,542 3. The city will be obligated to reimburse UPRR for the actual cost billed at UPRR's standard rates, including markups 4. The city's obligation to pay for work that exceeds the estimate would depend on the reason(s) for the overrun. 5. UPRR would not be permitted to bill for work that is not in the estimate 6. The city will have limited ability to dispute liability for work costing more than estimated 7. The city will have the right to monitor the work Attached is UPRR's most recent draft of the agreement for the proposed crossing work. There are a few remaining issues with this draft agreement that staff believe are important to have revised and are still under discussion with UPRR. These issues include the following: 1. When the work will commence. The City's preference would be for the work to be performed as soon as possible after the agreement is approved by City Council. Under the current draft agreement, the cost estimate can be recalculated if the work is not commenced by May 2nd (six months from November 2nd). If the agreement is approved by City Council by March 27, that would give UPRR only about a month to design and commence the work. Of course if the agreement is not approved by City Council, UPRR would not be bound by the November 2, 2011 estimate. 2. Section 3 (A): The city would like to clarify that the work for which UPRR is billing the City is listed in the estimate, which is necessary because UPRR is performing some work for which it has agreed not to charge the City. 3. Section 4(A): The city would like clarification that the plans and specs refer to future sidewalk improvements to be constructed after UPRR completes their work, not to the already completed road improvements. Staff is anxious to move this agreement forward to execution so the crossing work can be completed this year. If agreement between the city and UPRR can be reached, staff will present the final agreement at the March 27th meeting. OPTIONS: Discussion. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The estimated cost for the railroad crossing improvements is $236,542 but could be higher depending on the actual costs of these improvements. The 2012 budget includes sufficient REET funding to pay these costs. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, Senior Capital Projects Engineer Neil Kersten, Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Draft UPRR Agreement; copy of 1977 Agreement UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY uwor SUPPLEM ENTAL AGREEM ENT BUILDING AMERICA "`IOFC Non-Standard Form Approved:AVP-Law 03062012 IIII�r UPRR Folder No.: 717-64 UPRR Audit No. SI813 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT (EXISTING PUBLIC ROAD CROSSING IMPROVEMENT) THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT is made as of the day of 20 , by and between UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, ("Railroad") and the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington with a mailing address at 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley,Washington 99206 ("City"). RECITALS: By instrument dated June 30, 1977, the Spokane International Railroad Company and the County of Spokane entered into an agreement(the"Original Agreement"),identified in the records of the Railroad as Folder No. 717-64,Audit No. SI813,covering the construction,use,maintenance and repair of the Pines Road at-grade public road crossing (the "Road Crossing"), DOT No. 662- 519S, at Railroad's Mile Post 8.91 on its Spokane Subdivision, in Spokane County,near Spokane, Washington in the location shown on the Railroad Location Print marked Exhibit A,attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. The Railroad named herein is successor in interest to the Spokane International Railroad Company and the City is the successor in interest to the County of Spokane for the Original Agreement. In 2011 the City undertook, as its project, certain work in the area of the Road Crossing, including the widening of the west side of Pines Road to accommodate three southbound vehicle traffic lanes and the widening of a median island. Additional aspects of the project include work performed or to be performed by the Railroad in the area of the Road Crossing(signal modifications and improvements),as well as work yet to be performed by the City in the area of the Road Crossing (extension of the sidewalk along the west side of Pines Road). The combined work of the City and the Railroad is hereinafter referred to as the "Project." The Road Crossing, as improved, is hereinafter the"Roadway"and where the Roadway crosses the Railroad's property is the"Crossing Area." AGREEMENT: NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the promises and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows: SECTION 1. The exhibits below are attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof: Supplemental Public Road Xing Page 1 of 6 revised March 6, 2012 Form Approved,AVP-Law UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY uwor SUPPLEM ENTAL AGREEM ENT BUILDING AMERICA ""I'"` Non-Standard Form Approved:AVP-Law 03062012 III! Exhibit A Railroad Location Print Exhibit B Railroad's Signal Material Estimate with Schematic of Signal Work Exhibit C Railroad Form of Contractor's Right of Entry Agreement Exhibit D Currently Applicable Additives SECTION 2. The Railroad,at City's expense,shall furnish labor,material,equipment,and supervision for the following elements of the Project, i.e.,: • Relocating and upgrading of the crossing gates and cantilevers, replacing and relocating the existing signal house, and replacing crossing signals; • Engineering necessary to complete the above, and • Flagging necessary to complete the above and any City work on railroad right-of-way or within 25 feet of the railroad tracks. SECTION 3. A. The work to be performed by the Railroad, at the City's sole cost and expense, is described in the Railroad's Signal Material Estimate dated November 2, 2011, in the amount of $236,542,marked Exhibit B, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof(the "Estimate"). B. The Railroad,if it so elects,may recalculate and update the Estimate submitted to the City in the event construction is not commenced on the portion of the Project located on the Railroad's property within six (6)months from the date of the Estimate. C. All flagging or other protective services costs incurred by the Railroad are to be paid by the City or the Contractor as determined by the Railroad and the City. If it is determined that the Railroad will be billing the Contractor directly for such costs, the City agrees that it will pay the Railroad for any flagging costs that have not been paid by any Contractor within thirty(30)days of the Contractor's receipt of billing. D. The City agrees to reimburse the Railroad for one hundred percent (100%) of all actual costs incurred by the Railroad in connection with the Project including, but not limited to, actual costs of preliminary engineering review, construction inspection,procurement of materials, equipment rental, manpower and deliveries to the job site and all of the Railroad's then-current normal and customary additives(which shall include direct and indirect overhead costs)associated therewith. The Currently Applicable Additives in effect as of the date hereof are attached as Exhibit D hereto. SECTION 4. A. The City shall have the right to monitor the work undertaken by the Railroad pursuant to Section 3. As to that portion of the Project not undertaken by the Railroad, the City, at its expense, to the extent it has not already done so, shall prepare, or cause to be prepared by others, Supplemental Public Road Xing Page 2 of 6 revised March 6, 2012 Form Approved,AVP-Law UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY uwor SUPPLEM ENTAL AGREEM ENT BUILDING AMERICA' "cm Non-Standard Form Approved:AVP-Law 03062012 I I I1I detailed plans and specifications and submit such plans and specifications to the Railroad's Assistant Vice President Engineering—Design,or his authorized representative,for review and approval. The plans and specifications shall include all Roadway layout specifications, cross sections and elevations, associated drainage, and other appurtenances. B. The Railroad shall bill the City according to the Railroad's standard and customary practices and shall provide the Railroad's standard and customary documentation to support such billing. The City shall have the right to audit the Railroad's billing and documentation for the Project. C. The final one hundred percent(100%)completed plans that are approved in writing by the Railroad's Assistant Vice President Engineering—Design,or his authorized representative,are hereinafter referred to as the "Plans." The Plans are hereby made a part of this Agreement by reference. D. No changes in the Plans shall be made unless the Railroad has consented to such changes in writing. E. Notwithstanding the Railroad's approval of the Plans, the Railroad shall not be responsible for the permitting, design, details or construction of the Roadway. SECTION 5. After the Railroad completes the signal modifications and improvements, the City shall complete the installation of its improvements to Pines Road by extending the sidewalk on the west side of Pines Road pursuant to the plans previously approved by the Railroad. The City shall require its contractor(s) to execute the Railroad's standard and current form of Contractor's Right of Entry Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit C. City acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Contractor's Right of Entry Agreement and understanding of its terms, provisions, and requirements, and will inform its contractor(s) of the need to execute the Agreement. Under no circumstances will the City's contractor(s)be allowed onto the Railroad's premises without first executing the Contractor's Right of Entry Agreement. SECTION 6. Fiber optic cable systems may be buried on the Railroad's property. Protection of the fiber optic cable systems is of extreme importance since any break could disrupt service to users resulting in business interruption and loss of revenue and profits. City or its contractor(s)shall telephone the Railroad during normal business hours (7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Central Time, Monday through Friday, except holidays) at 1-800-336-9193 (also a 24-hour number, 7 day number for emergency calls)to determine if fiber optic cable is buried anywhere on the Railroad's premises to be used by the City or its contractor(s). If it is, City or its contractor(s)will telephone the telecommunications company(ies)involved, arrange for a cable locator, and make arrangements for relocation or other protection of the fiber optic cable prior to beginning any work on the Railroad's premises. Supplemental Public Road Xing Page 3 of 6 revised March 6, 2012 Form Approved,AVP-Law UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY rill SUPPLEMENTALAGREEMENT BUILDING AMERICA Non-Standard Form Approved:AVP-Law 03062012 SECTION 7. The City,for itself and for its successors and assigns,hereby waives any right of assessment against the Railroad, as an adjacent property owner,for any and all improvements made under this agreement. SECTION 8. Covenants herein shall inure to or bind each party's successors and assigns;provided,no right of the City shall be transferred or assigned,either voluntarily or involuntarily,except by express prior written consent of the Railroad. SECTION 9. The City shall, when returning this agreement to the Railroad (signed), cause same to be accompanied by such Order,Resolution,or Ordinance of the governing body of the City,passed and approved as by law prescribed, and duly certified, evidencing the authority of the person executing this agreement on behalf of the City with the power so to do, and which also will certify that funds have been appropriated and are available for the payment of any sums herein agreed to be paid by City. SECTION 10. Upon execution and delivery of this Agreement, the City shall pay to the Railroad an administrative handling charge of ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,000.00). SECTION 11. This agreement is supplemental to the Original Agreement,as herein amended,and nothing herein contained shall be construed as amending or modifying the same except as herein specifically provided. SECTION 12. SPECIAL PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009. If the City will be receiving American Recovery and Reinvestment Act("ARRA")funding for the Project, the City agrees that it is responsible in performing and completing all ARRA reporting documents for the Project. The City confirms and acknowledges that Section 1512 of the ARRA provisions applies only to a "recipient" receiving ARRA funding directly from the federal government and, therefore, (i) the ARRA reporting requirements are the responsibility of the City and not of the Railroad and(ii)the City shall not delegate any ARRA reporting responsibilities to the Railroad. The City also confirms and acknowledges that(i)the Railroad shall provide to the City the Railroad's standard and customary billing for expenses incurred by the Railroad for the Project including the Railroad's standard and customary documentation to support such billing and(ii)such standard and customary billing and documentation from the Railroad provides the information needed by the City to perform and complete the ARRA reporting documents. Supplemental Public Road Xing Page 4 of 6 revised March 6, 2012 Form Approved,AVP-Law UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY uwor SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT BUILDING AMERICA ""II'"` Non-Standard Form Approved:AVP-Law 03062012 IuI! IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have caused this Supplemental Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first hereinabove written. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (Federal Tax ID #94-6001323) By: JAMES P. GADE Director Contracts WITNESS: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY X Printed Name: Title: Supplemental Public Road Xing Page 5 of 6 revised March 6, 2012 Form Approved,AVP-Law �3 fiu:sr,�IIi4 '' �.. Y � ay 7.5� ( F a ,- �1 S A I OF NEBRASKA 1' -� Dave Heineman .__ 1)r� A)t€i€VNT 4�t f2qu), NV ;,r g (.iurreinur' lolm l C.rat *1.". , .\Y,' E4i) 1'70-1325° December 27, 2007 To: All State Transportation Agencies with Union Pacific Railroad Company (UPRR) Trackage Subject. FHWA Approval of Union Pacific Railroad Company January 1, 2004 Additive Rates On December 26,2007, FHWA approved Union Pacific Railroad Company's 2004 Billing Rates for Labor Surcharges,Overhead and Indirect Construction Costs,Equipment Costs and Force Account Insurance. Union Pacific has been notified of the approval and has been requested to update their billing procedures to reflect these new rates. FHWA's approval was based upon a review performed by the Nebraska Dept. of Roads. Copies of the review, Report No.2008-12,and FHWA's December 26,2007, approval letter are included with this transmittal.You will find the approved rate schedules in PART II of the report.Please pass this information on to the appropriate administrative and rail agreement officials within your agency. All State Transportation agencies are expected to reimburse the Railroad for the Labor Surcharge cost components(Section 1 in Schedules A and B).The Overhead and Indirect Construction Costs(Section 2 in Schedules A and B),are allowable under 23 CFR 140.907,but your Agency is not required to reimburse the Railroad for these cost components. Since reimbursement of these costs is voluntary, we ask that you inform Union Pac f c of your intentions and identib,which, if any, cost components you will reimburse. New,for 2004,was the addition of Equipment Additive rates,in lieu of billing direct hours/miles of use.These rates are only applicable for labor performed by personnel within the Maintenance of Way—Agreement labor cost pool.For work that involves signal or flagging labor,the Vehicles, only rate should be used. For work that involves track labor,the Vehicles,Machines&Work Equipment rate should be used. Also,a change was made in the Transportation Depatlrfient's TE&Y—Road labor group. Occupational training labor costs were moved out of the Labor Surcharge—Other Benefits line and moved into the Supporting Costs— Transportation Department Specific—Employee Safety/Training line. If you have any questions,please contact me at 402-479-4558,or Al Sand at 402-479-4403. • Jim Dietsch,Highway Audit Manager Controller Division—Audit Section Nebraska Dept.of Roads PO Box 94759 Lincoln,NE 68509-4759 SHA Distribution: 1. Arizona 2 Arkansas 3. California 4. Colorado 5. Idaho 6. Illinois 7. Iowa 8. Kansas 9. Louisiana 10. Minnesota 11. Missouri 12. Montana 13. Nebraska 14. Nevada 15. New Mexico 16. Oklahoma 17. Oregon 18. Tennessee 19. Texas 20. Utah • 21. Washington 22. Wisconsin 23. Wyoming Copy: Union Pacific Railroad • Nebraska Division FHWA—Lincoln • Attachments: NDOR Review Report No.2008-12 December 26,2007,FHWA Approval Letter • t00 Centennial Mall North Room 220 ea Lincoln. NE 68508-3851 Nebraska.FI-IWA @FHWA.[JO`t.GOV us DelxvimeN of Trnnspa(tol pn Federal Highway AdmInIstrallon December 26, 2007 In Reply Refer To NEBRASKA DIVISION FHWA HAD-NE Mr, Jim Dietsch • Highway Audit Manager Nebraska Department of Roads PD Box 94759 Lincoln, NE 68509-4759 Dear Mr. Dietsch, Your letter of October 1, 2007 requests, in accordance with 23 C"FR I=40,906(b)( I)(iv). Federal Highway Administration (F'T.l\t.%J1) review and approval of Union Pacilie Railroad Company Labor Additive Rates effective as of January I. 2004_ The request is supported by Nebraska Department of Roads (NDOR) Review Report No. 2008-12. A review of the attached report has been completed. FT TWA funds the review and labor additive rates acceptable and approves their use effective January 1, 2004. FHWA is requesting a copy of the NDOR approval notification letter when it is sent to Union Pacific Railroad Company for our files. in conjunction with your notification to the twenty-three State 'transportation Departments listed in your letter, we will forward copies of the review and appropriate correspondence to the LUWA Division Financial Manager in each state. Please contact me at (402) 437-5966 if you have any questions. Sincerely yours. 1 -)-a i L 7 Richard L. Kuzelka'�� Transportation Finance Manager 4�i �r 4� .:-,44,4r. ; ' '-'' MENU ,..„..._...._........ . . . REVIEW OF UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 1400 DOUGLAS STREET OMAHA,NEBRASKA 68179 ADDITIVE RATES FOR LABOR SURCHARGES OVERHEAD and INDIRECT CONSTRUCTION COSTS FORCE ACCOUNT INSURANCE, and EQUIPMENT COSTS This report is prepared for use of Nebraska Department of Roads administration officials. Final determinations establishing the official position of the Nebraska Department of Roads on the matters reported herein are made by these officials. Date Issued: October 3, 2007 Nebraska Department of Roads Controller Division-Audit Section Report No. 2008-12 Approved: kilt_ ,� t ,amen A. Dictsch Highway Audit Manager Report No. 2008-12 PART I - SCOPE AND OPINION A. Scope of Review We have reviewed the January I,2004 additive rates for Labor Surcharges,Overhead and Indirect Construction Costs, Force Account Insurance,and Equipment Costs of the Union Pacific Railroad Company(UPRR).The rates were based on 2004 calendar year costs and are the responsibility of the UPRR. Our responsibilities were to provide reasonable assurances that the rate methodology was reasonable,that cost components and labor bases were representative of actual allowable costs or cost estimates in accordance with 23 CFR,Part 1401 and 646B,and Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations,Chapter 1, Subpart 31.2,Contracts with Commercial Organizations(48 CFR 1-31.2),and that the rate computations were accurate. Our review procedures included examining,on a test basis,the evidence supporting the rate computations. We believe the tests and procedures that we used in our examination provided a reasonable basis for our conclusion. B. Conclusions and Recommendations Our review indicates the Union Pacific's rates are based upon a reasonable methodology,that they were representative of actual eligible costs or cost estimates,and that the computations were accurate. We recommend that the rates shown in PART II—SUMMARY SCHEDULES of this report be accepted by the Federal Highway Administration for use on Federal and State Highway project billings. Reimbursement of the Overhead and Indirect Construction Costs components is also subject to State Agency approval. According FAPG 23CFR 140.907, State's have the opportunity to"elect"to reimburse the railroad company for these costs. As a result,each State will have to determine the extent to which they wish to participate in these costs and notify the Railroad accordingly. C. Comments The equipment additive is applicable to Maintenance-of-Way Agreement labor,only.The additive cost pool includes short and long term leases,taxes,depreciation,maintenance,repairs,and fuel, for both company owned and company leased vehicles,equipment and machinery.The cost pool also includes reimbursements to UPRR employees for automobile rentals and use of personal vehicles.When the additive is used on project billings,there should be no direct charges for the types of expenses included in the cost pool. If a Contractor performs work on a project,charges for their vehicles,equipment,machinery and operators will continue to be billed as a direct cost to the project. The Vehicle rate portion of the Equipment additive should be applied to signal and flagging labor.The Combined Vehicle,Machines/Work Equipment rate should be applied to track labor. Bill Clerk time is included within the Clerical Supervision and Benefits line item of the MofW Department Support Cost component.For Agencies that reimburse the Union Pacific for the Clerical Supervision and Benefits line item cost,Bill Clerk time should not be billed or allowed as a direct cost item.For Agencies that have chosen not to reimburse the Union Pacific for this line item cost,Bill Clerk time would be allowable as a direct cost and the MofW-Agreement labor surcharge would apply. In the TE&Y—Road labor group,we moved occupational training labor costs out of the Labor Surcharge—Other Benefits line item and placed it in the Supporting Cost—Transportation Department Specific—Employee Safety/Training line item. It is Union Pacific management's responsibility to negotiate with each State Agency regarding reimbursement of these costs. The results of this review have been discussed with representatives of the Union Pacific Railroad.They have agreed to accept the rates as shown in the PART II-SUMMARY SCHEDULES. D. Applicability Use of these rates for billing purposes is contingent upon approval by the FHWA. Upon their approval,the rates should be applied to labor costs incurred in 2004 and after,under those actual cost agreements where final payment to the Company has not been made. The rates should remain in effect until a subsequent rate has been approved by FHWA. This report is intended for use by the Union Pacific Railroad Company,the Federal Highway Administration and the State Transportation%Highway Agencies or equivalent agencies in the States where UPRR operates and is not intended to be used by anyone other than those specified parties. • - 1 - Report No, 2008-12 • PART II-SUMMARY SCHEDULE A. Schedule of Maintenance of Way Additive Rates Effective January 1, 2004 Based upon costs for the year ending December 31, 2004 Agreement-Labor Non-Agreement- Labor Line Item Cumulative Line Item Composite Rate Total Rate Rate 1.Labor Surcharges per FAPG 23CFR 140.906(b): a. Payroll Taxes 24.60% 17.51% b. Health&Welfare 25.74% 16.91% c. VacationlSick/Holiday/Pd Leave 10.79% 5.58% d. Other Benefits 1.85% 9.43% Labor Surcharge Total 62.98% 62.98% 49.43% 49.43% 2.Overhead and Indirect Construction Costs per FAPG 23CFR 140.907: a. Supporting Costs 1. MofW Department Specific (a)-Clerical Supervision and Benefits 4.62% 4.62% (b)-Non/Agreement Supervision and Benefits 14.65% 14.65% (c)-Supplies and Services ( 1 )-Small Tools and Supplies 2.18% 2.18% (2)-Miscellaneous Material 2.15% 2.15% (3)-Stationary&Office Supplies 0.46% 0.46% (4)-Industrial Gases 0.12% 0.12% (5)-Radios, StatioNYard Supplies, etc. 1.14% 1.14% (d )-Utilities/Phones 3.63% 3.63% (e)-Employee Safety/Training 0.94% 0.94% Sub-total for MofW Department Specific Costs 29.89% 92.87% 29.89% 79.32% 2. Allocated/Other Departments (a)-Operating Department Support Costs 10.09% 10.09% (b)-Bonuses 0.10% 0.10% (c)-Stock Options 1.25% 1.25% (d)-Undistributed Costs 2.15% 2.15% (e)-Finance 2.54% 2.54% (f)-Human Resources 2.20% 2.20% (g )-Information Technology 6.96% 6.96% (h)-Labor Relations 0.49% 0.49% (i) -Depreciation Office/Computers 3.06% 3.06% (j )-Property Tax 0.23% 0.23% Sub-total for Allocated/Other Departments Costs 29.07% 29.07% Total 58.96% 121.94% 58.96% 108.39% b. General Administration 6.31% 128.25% 6.31% 114.70% 3.Force Account Insurance 16.00% 16.00% 4.Equipment Costs a. Vehicles, only- For use with Signal and Flagging Labor 23.51% n/a% b. Vehicles, Machines&Work Equipment-For use with Track Labor 60.34% n/a % -2- • Report No. 2008-12 PART H--SUMMARY SCHEDULE B. Schedule of Transportation Additive Rates Effective January 1, 2004 Based upon costs for the year ending December 31, 2004 Tran Supv-Agreement TE&Y-Road Labor Line Item Cumulative Line Item Composite Rate Total Rate Rate 1.Labor Surcharges per FAPG 23CFR 140.906(b): a. Payroll Taxes 24.84% 27.09% b. Health&Welfare 19.89% 28.46% c. Vacation/Sick/Holiday/Pd Leave 12.34% 16.50% d. Other Benefits 4.98% 8.32% e. Protection/Guarantee Pay 13.53% 0.00% Labor Surcharge Total 75.58% 75.58% 80.37% 80.37% 2. Overhead and Indirect Construction Costs per FAPG 23CFR 140.907: a. Supporting Costs 1. Transportation Department Specific (a)-Clerical Supervision and Benefits 8.41% 8.41% ( b)-Non/Agreement Supervision and Benefits 12.52% 12.52% (c)-Supplies and Services ( 1 )-Small Tools and Supplies 0.00% 0.00% (2)-Miscellaneous Material 0.48% 0.48% (3)-Stationary&Office Supplies 1.56% 1.56% (4)- Industrial Gases 0.00% 0.00% (5)-Radios,Station/Yard Supplies, etc. 0.64% 0.64% (d)-Travel 0.69% 0.69% (e)-Utilities/Phones 2.12% 2.12% (f)-Employee Safety/Training 4.60% 4.60% (g)-Transportation/Lodging-(TE&Y Labor only) 12.24% n/a% ( h)-Engineer/Trainman Reserve Allowance(TE&Y Labor Only) 0.20% nfa%q Sub-total for Transportation Department Specific Costs 43.46% 119.04% 31.02% 111.39% 2. Allocated/Other Departments (a)-Operating Department Support Costs 9.75% 9.75% (b)-Bonuses 0.07% 0.07% (c)-Stock Options 0.93% 0.93% (d )-Undistributed Costs 2.08% 2.08% (e)-Finance 2.45% 2.45% (f)-Human Resources 2.13% 2.13% (g)-Information Technology 6.73% 6.73% (h)-Labor Relations 0.48% 0.48% (i ) -Depreciation Office/Computers 2.96% 2.96% (j )-Property Tax 0.22% 0.22% Sub-total for Allocated/Other Departments Costs 27.80% 27.80% Total 71.26% 146.84% 58.82% 139.19% b. General Administration 6.10% 152.94% 6.10% 145.29% 3.Force Account Insurance 16.00% 16.00% 4.Equipment Costs a. Vehicles n/a% n/a % b. Machines/Work Equipment n/a% n/a% -3- CROSSING:PUBLIC SPOKANE,WA. PINES ROAD M.P. 8.95 SPOKANE SUB. DOT#662519S MEMO TERREL ANDERSON ATTACHED 1S A M&FAE&FORM 30-1 COST ESTIMATE DATED 11/02/2011 COVERING THE INSTALLATION OF HIGHWAY CROSSING SIGNALS WITH GATE AND RELOCATE ONE CANTILEVER. This estimate is only valid for a period of 6 months and will expire on 05/02/20 12.If the date has expired,a new estimate should be requested prior to entering into an agreement with the state or recollectable party. JAMES POLLARD 402-544-3513 DATE: 2011-11-02 ESTIMATE OF MATERIAL AND FORCE ACCOUNT WORK BY THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD THIS ESTIMATE GCOD FOR 6 MONTHS EXPIRATION DATE IS :2012-05-02 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: INSTALL AUTOMATIC FLASHING LIGHT CROSSING SIGNALS WITH GATE AND UPGRADE CANTILEVER WITH LED LIGHTS AT SPOKANE, WA PINES RD. M.P. 8.95 ON THE SPOKANE SUBDIVISION DOT# 662519S WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY RAILROAD WITH EXPENSE AS BELOW: SIGNAL - FEDERAL/STATE - 1006 ESTIMATED USING FEDERAL ADDITIVES WITH INDIRECT AND OVERHEAD CONSTRUCTION COST'S - 167.76% BID: 60427 AWO: 85613 MP,SUBDIV: 8.95, SPOKANE SERVICE UNIT: 18 CITY: SPOKANE STATE: WA DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT LABOR MATERIAL RECOLL UPRR TOTAL ENGINEERING WORK ENGINEERING 5956 5956 5956 LABOR ADDITIVE 167.76k 17997 17997 17997 SIG-HWY XNG 4821 4821 4821 TOTAL ENGINEERING 28774 28774 28774 SIGNAL WORK BILL PREP 500 900 900 CANTILEVER END. REMOVAL 5000 5000 5000 CONTRACT 2579 2579 2579 FLAGGING 10000 10000 10000 LABOR ADDITIVE 167.76k 73790 73790 73790 MATL STORE EXPENSE 4 4 4 METER SERVICE 5000 5000 5000 NON STOCK GATE ASSEM. 8000 8000 8000 PERSONAL EXPENSES 23190 23190 23190 ROCK/GRAVEL/FILL 3000 3000 3000 SALES TAX 1031 1031 1031 SIGNAL 43086 25790 68876 68876 TRANSP/IB/OB/RCLW CONTR 6397 6397 6397 ENVIRONMENTAL-PERMITS 1 1 1 TOTAL SIGNAL 117776 89992 207768 207768 LABOR/MATERIAL EXPENSE 146550 89992 RECOLLECTIBLE/UPRR EXPENSE 236542 0 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST 236542 THE ABOVE FIGURES ARE ESTIMATES ONLY AND SUBJECT TO FLUCTUATION. IN THE EVENT OF AN INCREASE OR DECREASE IN THE COST OR QUANTITY OF MATERIAL OR LABOR REQUIRED, UPRR WILL BILL FOR ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS AT THE CURRENT EFFECTIVE RATE. FORM 30-1 PAGE 01 MORE WORK ORDER AUTHORIZATION-DETAIL OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES PROS NO: 60427 A.W.O. NO: 85613 W.O. NO: RAILROAD: UPRR CO. B.I. NO: 08EN10 LOCATION: SPOKANE,WA,PINES ROAD,SPOKANE SUB. STATE: WA DEPARTMENT: ENGINEERING SERVICES SERVICE UNIT: 18 VAL SEC: 4501 INSTALL AUTOMATIC FLASHING LIGHT CROSSING SIGNALS WITH GATE AND UPGRADE CANTILEVER WITH LED LIGHTS AT SPOKANE, WA PINES RD. M.P. 8.95 ON THE SPOKANE SUBDIVISION DOTS 642519S WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY RAILROAD WITH EXPENSE AS BELOW: SIGNAL - FEDERAL/STATE - 100% FORM 30-1 PAGE 02 MORE WORK ORDER AUTHORIZATION-DETAIL OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES PROJ NO: 60427 A.W.O. NO: 85613 W.O. NO: RAILROAD: UPRR CO. R.I. NO: 08EN10 LOCATION: SPOKANE,WA,PINES ROAD,SPOKANE SUB. SPATE; WA DEPARTMENT: ENGINEERING SERVICES VAL SEC: 4501 SCOPE OF WORK PROJECT VAL M.P. M.P. JOINT NUMBER SEC STATE FROM TO SEGMENT FACILITY 60427 4501 WA 8.95 8.95 5880 • FORM 30-1 PAGE 03 MORE WORK ORDER AUTHORIZATION-DETAIL OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES PROJ NO: 60427 A.W.O. NO: 85613 W.O. NO: RAILROAD: UPRR CO. B.I. NO: OBENIO LOCATION: SPOKANE,WA,PINES ROAD,SPOKANE SUB. STATE; WA DEPARTMENT: ENGINEERING SERVICES VAL SEC; 4501 LABOR PLAN GANG GANG TYPE GANG NUMBER WORK WORK CODE GANG DAYS DIRECT TYPE DESCRIPTION NBA IN GANG CODE DESCRIPTION ALLOWED LABOR $ SIGCU5 SIGNAL 5 MAN G 0 5 34007 SIG-HWY XNG 2.00 2123.00 SUB-TOTAL 2.00 2123.00 SIG005 5 PERSON FOR S 0 5 34004 SIG-HWY XNG 38.59 40963.29 TOTAL 43,086.29 FORM 30-1 PAGE 04 MORE WORK ORDER AUTHORIZATION-DETAIL OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES PROD NO: 60427 A.W.O. NO: 85613 I W.O. NO: RAILROAD: UPRR CO. S.I. NO: 08EN10 LOCATION: SPOKANE,WA,PINES ROAD,SPOKANE SUB. STATE: WA DEPARTMENT: ENGINEERING SERVICES VAL SEC: 4501 I STOCK MATERIAL PLAN ITEM ITEM UNIT DIRECT NUMBER DESCRIPTION COST QTY UM MATL $ 09011240 CABLE TIE, NYLON 1 1/8" MAX. DIA. 0.02 200 EA 4 09011980 CABLE TIE, NYLON 3 1/2" MAX. DIA. 0.18 20 EA 4 09014950 CIRCUIT BRKR,120/240V 20A 2 POLE 14.64 1 EA 15 09015690 CIRCUIT BREAKER, 120/240V 30A AC 5.97 1 EA 6 09054360 RELAY, GEN.PURPOSE 120V. TAB 856 5.24 1 EA 5 09057650 SOCKET,P-B 27E122 TAB 836A & 856 2.17 1 EA 2 09065700 TAPE, ELECTRICAL PLASTIC 3.75 2 RL 8 09066900 TERMINAL,SPADE,10-12 ?TIRE,#8 STUD 0.17 10 EA 2 09137100 TERM.LUG 3/16 CABLE-1/4 POST 2412 0.55 30 EA 17 09215100 33466 TERMINAL, RING TONGUE AMP 0.19 44 EA 8 09224750 216-107 TERMINAL,FERRULE,FOR #10 0.05 20 EA 1 09224800 216-104 TERMINAL, FERRULE, W 0.02 50 EA 1 09260350 TERMINAL,#16-14 #8 SPADE 0.07 35 EA 2 09261420 321524-1 TERMINAL,TEST 16-22 A 1.79 4 EA 7 09261570 321527-1 TERMINAL, TEST 1.72 15 EA 26 09401140 ADAPTER, 4 INCH CARLON PLASTIC 2.95 2 EA 6 09409820 BUSHING, 4" PLASTIC,INSULATING 0.82 2 EA 2 09424920 CONDUIT, 4", PVC, TYPE 40 1.90 150 LF 285 094667930 LOCKNUT, 4 INCH, GALVANIZED 5.76 2 EA 12 09844170 GROUND ROD, 5/8 INCH X 8 FEET 8.95 12 EA ' 107 09846750 GRND.ROD CONN. 4WAY ONESHOT. 5.20 12 EA 62 09908640 WIRE,#6 AWG.1 COND.COPPER,SOLID 0.48 300 LF 144 09912400 WIRE #6 AWG 2 CND 500'RL. TK WIRE 1.26 500 LF 630 09913200 WIRE,#6, 5 CORD 500'ROLL SHIELDED 4.00 1000 LF 4000 09915610 WIRE #6 AWG 1 COND COPPER, STRAN 0.77 220 LF 169 09930550 WIRE #10 AWG 1 COND COPPER, STRAN 0.24 700 LF 168 f 09932310 WIRE #10 AWG 1 COND COPPER, TWIST 0.55 250 LF 138 09946100 WIRE #14, 7 CND 500' ROLL SHIELDE 1.63 500 LF 815 09960090 WIRE #I6 AWG 1 COND COPPER, STRAN 0.10 300 IF 30 09976180 WIRE,#22,TW.PR. BELDEN #8761 0.13 20 LP 3 13547870 SHEET METAL SCREW, #10 X 1 INCH 3.50 1 BX 4 13552450 SHEET METAL SCREW,#12 X 3/4" 2.10 2 BX 4 13553150 SHEET METAL SCREW #12 X 1" 3.05 2 BX 6 17061400 PADLOCK,SIGNAL,WITHOUT KEY,AMERIC 15.10 9 EA 136 28033210 CARTON, 39 1/8"L X 23 1/4"W X 17 6.23 1 EA 6 28033230 CARTON, 47 3/8"L X 39 1/2"W X 18" 12.07 1 EA 12 28041880 PALLET, 48 X 40 INCH 2/WAY 9.89 2 EA 20 35040020 PLASTER OF PARIS, #DAP 10308 3.01 4 BX 12 39340220 SIGN, HIGHWAY CROSSING,STANDARD 50.00 2 EA 100 52001370 SURGE PROTECTOR SP20-2A TAB 585 71.28 2 EA 143 FORM 30-1 PAGE 05 MORE WORK ORDER AUTHORIZATION-DETAIL OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES PROJ NO: 60427 A.W.O. NO: 85613 W.O. NO: RAILROAD: UPRR CO_ B.I. NO: 08EN10 LOCATION: SPOKANE,WA,PINES ROAD,SPOKANE SUB. STATE: WA DEPARTMENT: ENGINEERING SERVICES VAL SEC: 4501 52003630 POWER CABLE, CABIN TO GENERATOR - 105.49 1 EA 105 52005700 BOND WIRE,7 STRANDS 100 LF. ROLL 0.87 250 LF 218 52016830 WIRE DUCT, 2X3 8.68 11 EA 95 52016940 WIRE DUCT, 3X3 10.23 1 EA 10 52017510 WIRE DUCT COVER 2"X6' 1.88 11 EA 21 52017620 WIRE DUCT COVER 3"X6' 2.78 1 EA 3 52019530 ENCLOSURE,SHUNT,POLE MOUNTED.24X2 181.77 3 EA 545 52019560 EQUALIZER, H.D. TAB 583 9.31 13 EA 121 52019720 FOUNDATION,CANT, PRECAST 4 BOLT 3082.06 1 EA 3082 52021550 FOUNDATION,4',STEEL,FOR EL•SHR/GAT 328.32 2 EA 657 52025270 HOUSE, 6X6, W/TIB, W/CLIMATE CUNT 7996.68 1 EA 7997 52027350 CLIP BOARD - FOR SIGNAL PRINTS 8.02 1 EA 8 52027430 STEP BOX 16.32 1 EA 16 52028420 LIGHTNING ARRESTOR,CLR-CORM TAB 3 7.00 59 EA 413 52029780 LIGHTNING ARR,HD TAB 582 W/O BASE 10.03 4 EA 40 52030010 LIGHTNING ARRESTOR CONN.STRIP 6.32 4 EA 25 52042650 POST, MOUNTING, FOR SHUNT HOUSING 19.50 6 EA 117 52068650 TERMINAL, #6 - 5 WIRE - RING TYPE 0.16 55 EA 9 52070010 TERMINAL,#12-10 WIRE,RING TONGUE 0.22 300 EA 66 52071600 TERMINAL,#20-16 WIRE,RING TONGUE 0.09 150 EA 14 52072280 TERMINAL BLOCK, SIGNAL 2 POST BAK 4.44 23 EA 102 52072740 TERMINL BLOCK,SIGNAL 12 POST 6 UN 15.85 1 EA 16 52072960 TERMINAL BLOCK, SIGNAL 12 POST 15.35 12 EA 184 52074570 TEST LINK, 1" CENTER TO CENTER 1.53 22 EA 34 52074580 TEST LINK. 2-3/8" CENTER TO CENTE 1.89 1 EA 2 52079550 WIRE TAG, PLASTIC - WHITE 0.14 100 EA 14 52079560 MARKING PEN(FOR WHITE TAG) 1.95 1 EA 2 52109370 GATE ARM, ADJ.16-32' 428.34 1 EA 428 52122140 HIGH WIND BRACKET 5"OR 4" 65.69 1 EA 66 52126300 LED LGHT RTRFT KIT 12" UP260T12/W 93.03 20 EA 1861 52136470 SHEAR PIN, SK-1000-1 5.50 1 EA 6 52258500 MULTIEREQ.NBS 267-560 TAB641A PAR 522.99 1 EA 523 52258590 NBS, TAB 641, 62775-1543 392.78 2 EA 786 52263600 SURGE ARRESTOR,METER LOOP. 30.87 1 EA 31 52745833 RELAY, TAB 884, NEUTRAL, A62-277 299.20 1 EA 299 52773800 RELAY BRACKET_HOLDS 2 B1 RELAYS. 81.98 1 EA 82 52776370 RELAY PLUGBOARD,ORS B1,TAB 900 30.67 1 EA 31 52777970 FLAG TERMINAL, FOR GRS, 14-10 2.17 15 EA 33 52778110 FLAG TERMINAL, FOR GRS, 20-16 1.58 15 EA 24 52779280 RELAY TEST TERM,GRS B1 6.42 1 EA 6 53311490 EXTRACTOR FOR "B"TERMINALS P3-308 9.13 1 EA 9 53311510 TEST NUT WRENCH. GRS #P3-320 33.01 1 EA 33 53648010 INSULATING CAP & SHIELD ASSY. 2.34 4 EA 9 53903460 EPD 120/240TDFL SURGE PROTECTOR 276.21 1 EA 276 53954500 180429-000 BOOTLEG KIT 50.58 5 EA 253 1 FORM 30-I PAGE 06 MORE WORK ORDER AUTHORIZATION-DETAIL OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES PROJ NO: 60427 A.W.Q. NO; 85613 W.O. NO: RAILROAD: UPRR CO. B.I. NO: 08E1110 LOCATION: SPOKANE,WA,PINES ROAD,SPOKANE SUB. STATE: WA DEPARTMENT: ENGINEERING SERVICES VAL SEC: 4501 TOTAL 25,794 FORM 30-1 PAGE 07 MORE WORK ORDER AUTHORIZATION-DETAIL OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES PROJ NO: 60427 NO: 85613 W.O. NO: RAILROAD: UPRR CO. B.I. NO: 08EN10 LOCATION: SPOKANE,WA,PINES ROAD,SPOKANE SUB. STATE: WA DEPARTMENT: ENGINEERING SERVICES VAL SEC: 4501 JOB ACCT UNIT TOTAL CHRGABLE TO NO. NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UM COST LABOR MATERIAL P.1. O.E. OTHER !VAL SEC: 4501 ! I ! I 1 1 ! I f** NON JOINT FACILITY **I ! I ! ! 1 ! ! ** MAIN LINE ** ! r ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 ! 709 i ENGINEERING I f f ! 59561 SIG-HWY XNG W/C 34001! f ! ! 4821! ! ! ! ! ! LABOR ADDITIVE 167.76% I I I ! 17997! ! ! I !709-0021-00010 JOB TOTAL ! I ! ! 28774! ! ! ! 28774 6 ! 027 1 SIGNAL ! l ! ! ! 25790! SIG-HWY XNG W/C 34004! 192 MD ! 40963! 1 ! ! ! ! BILL PREP ! ! ! ! 900! ! ! ! 1 l PERSONAL EXPENSES I I ! I ! 23190! I ! ! ! ROCK/GRAVEL/FILL ! I ! ! ! 3000! ! ! ! ! CANTILEVER FND. REMOVAL! ! ! I 50001 ! ! 1 i FLAGGING ! ! ! ! ! 10000! ! ! 1 ! NON STOCK GATE ASSFM. I ! 1 ! ! 80001 ! ! METER SERVICE I ! f I ! 50001 ! ! ! 1 TRANSP/IB/OB/RCLW CONTRI ! ! I ! 6397! ! ! ! ! CONTRACT - I ! I ! I 25791 1 ! 1 ! MATL STORE EXPENSE ! ! ! ! I 4! ! ! ! ! SALES TAX ! ! ! I ! 10311 ! ! ! ! LABOR ADDITIVE 167.76% ! ! ! ! 70229! ! L ! 709-0021-00010 ! ! JOB TOTAL ! ! ! ! 112092! 89991! 1 ! 202083 8 1 709 1 FEDERAL/STATE ! 1 ! ! 1 ! ! ! i ! SIGNAL ! l I ! ! ! I ! SIG-HWY XNG W/C 34007! 10 MD ! 2123! ! ! ! i S LABOR ADDITIVE 167.76% I I I l 35611 I ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! I ! ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! 1 ! I 709-0021-00010 1 ! JOB TOTAL I I 1 ! 5684! ! 1 ! 5684 1 ! I ! ! k I • 1 ! 799 1 709 I ENVIRONMENTAL-PERMITS I ! ! ! l 1! ! I I ! ! ! ! ! ! I 1 1709-0021-00010 1 ! JOB TOTAL 1 I I 1 ! 1! I ! 1 FORM 30-1 PAGE 08 MORE WORK ORDER AUTHORIZATION-DETAIL OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES PROS NO: 60427 A.W.O. NO: 85613 W.O. NO: RAILROAD: UPRR CO. S.I. NO: 08EN10 LOCATION: SPOKANE,WA,PINES ROAL,SPOKANE SUB. STATE: WA DEPARTMENT: ENGINEERING SERVICES VAL SEC: 4501 JOB ACCT UNIT TOTAL CHRGABLE TO NO. NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UM COST LABOR MATERIAL P.I. O.E. OTHER I ! ! I I I I I ! ! ! ! ! ! I I I 1 ! ! ! I I 1 E I I ! ! I ! ! ! ! 1 I 1 1 ! I I ! ! 1 ! I I I ! I I ! r ! I I 1 1 ! 1 I ! ! I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 ! I 1 1 I ! I I 1 I I ! 1 I ! s ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! 1 I I I I I I I 1 I i I I 1 1 ! I I I I I I I I I f ! I 11 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 ! s 1 1 1 ! 1 1 ! I 1 ! I I I ! I 1 I ! I 1 I ! I 1 I I I I I 1 ! 1 ! ! I I I I ! 1 1 1 I ! I I I I I ! 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 s I ! I 1 1 I ! I ! I I 1 1 ! I I I I 1 I I I I I ! ! I I I I I ! ! I 1 -- I I I 1 I 1 1 ! 1 I I I I I I I ! ! 1 l 1 I I I I I I ! ! I I I I ! ! I I ! I I I I 1 I I I 1 ! I ! ! I I I I I i ! I I I I I I f ! I ! 1 I I I ! I ! I ! ! ! I I I I I I ! I 1 1 I I 1 1 ! 1 I I I I I ! I I I ! I I !PROJECT TOTALS 60427 1 11 ! 146550! 89992! I I 236542 FORM 30-1 PAGE 09 MORE WORK ORDER AUTHORIZATION-DETAIL OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES PROJ NO: 60427 A.W.O. NO: 85613 W.O. NO: RAILROAD: DPRR CO. B.I. NO: 08EN10 LOCATION: SPOKANE,WA,PINES ROAD,SPOKANE SUB. STATE: WA DEPARTMENT: ENGINEERING SERVICES VAL SEC: 4501 JOB ACCT UNIT TOTAL CHRGABLE TO NO. NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UM COST LABOR MATERIAL P.I. O.E. OTHER ! ! 1 1 ! I ! ! ! ! ! 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 ! • I I I ! ! I I I ! I ! ! I ! ! ! 1 ! I 1 ! I ! ! ! S S I ! ! I I I 1 - ! ! l ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 ! 1 I • I ! f ! I 1 ! I • I I S I I I ! I ! 1 I 1 ! I ! l ! ! • 1 ! 1 I 1 I ! ! S '. l I I I ! ! 1 I ! 1 1 ! ! l 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 I I I ! I ! ! ! 1 I I 1 i ! ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! ! I 1 ! ! ! ! I I ! ! ! I ! 1 ! I ! I 1 I I ! ! 1 I 1 I I I I . 1 I 1 1 ! ! I 1 ! I I 1 1 ! 1 ! 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 ! I 1 I I 1 1 ! 1 ! I I I 1 I I F I I I 1 1 ! 1 I 1 1 ! 1 1 1 ! 1 ! ACCT 709 SUBTOTAL ! I• 1 l ! ! 1 236542 1 ! 1 S 1 I ! 1 I 1 I 1 ! 1 I I 1 ! 1 1 ! ! 1 I I ! 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! I 1 1ESTIMATE TOTALS ! 1 1 ! 146550! 89992! ! ! 236542 ESTIMATED BY: ESRV241 CID#: 223253 00 TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENITURES: $236,542 DATE: 11-02-2011 APPROVED BY: APPROVED BY: 1 FORM 30-2 PAGE 10 LAST WORK ORDER AUTHORITY-DETAIL OF ESTIMATED CREDITS PROS NO: 60427 A.W.O. NO: 85613 W.O. NO: RAILROAD: UPRR CO. B.I. NO: 06EN10 LOCATION: SPOKANE,WA,PINES ROAD,SPOKANE SUB. STATE: WA DEPARTMENT: ENGINEERING SERVICES VAL SEC: 4501 JOB ACCT - LEDGER NO. NO. DESCRIPTION SALVAGE VALUE !VAL SEC: 4501 ! ! ! ! 4 I ** MAIN LINE ** 1 1 ! ! ! 1 360 RET. SIGNAL ESTIMATED CREDIT TO 'RESERVE FOR ROAD PROPERTY TO BE RETIRED AND REPLACED' $ ESTIMATED CREDIT TO 'RESERVE PROPERTY RETIRED AND NOT TO BE REPLACED' $ ESTIMATED CREDIT TO 'EQUIPMENT RETIRED' $ ESTIMATED CREDIT TO $ ESTIMATED BY: ESRV241 CID#: 223253 000 DATE: 11-02-2011 APPROVED BY: APPROVED BY: AREMA UNIT STATEMENT OF RAILROAD HIGHWAY GRADE CROSSING SIGNALS ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR PID #60427 PM BUIL.011410 AM R1+:AV BY THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD STREET PINES RD. TOWN SPOKANE WA. , MILEPOST 8.95 SUBDIVISION SPOKANE AAR/DOT NO. 6625195 WORK ORDER# 85613 DESCRIPTION UNIT VALUE QUANTITY UNITS NON-CODED TRK. CIRCUIT,(Standalone APTAC or Ring 10) 2 0 0 SUPERIMPOSED CIRCUIT(AFTAC)/DETECTION LOOP 2 0 0 HIGHWAY GRADE CROSSING SIGNAL 2 1 2 (ONE PAIR OF FLASHING LIGHTS) ADDITIONAL PAIR OF LIGHTS 1 1 1 GATE MECHANISM,AUTOMATIC 8 1 8 WITH ARM UP TO 26 FT GATE MECHANISM,AUTOMATIC 10 0 0 WITH ARM OVER 26 FT GCPIIIXP(Constant warning der ice,per track circuit) 15 1 15 EXIT GATE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM RACK* 10 0 0 MOVEMENT DETECTOR(PMD) 6 0 0 MOVEMENT DETECTOR(STANDBY UNIT) 3 0 0 RADIO DATA LINK,PER UNIT 1 0 0 PREEMPTION CIRCUIT 2 0 0 DATA RECORDER 1 0 0 REMOTE MONITORING DEVICE* 2 1 2 BONDED RAIL JOINTS (per mile,each rail,single heeded) 1 0 0 BATTERY AND CHARGER(per set) 1 2 2 TOTAL UNIT COUNT 30 PAVEMENT RESTORATION COSTS (Actual) ,Mutual Maintenance Cost at SI70/Unit $5,100 *UP supplied Unit Value November 3,2011 O O CONNECTS TO DRAWING 8.54 64 NBS TO FISH LAKE 2156'25.5 SEC.C 49 M.P.H. MONTGOMERY DR. M. 954 N8S 522-Iz 4 011 50' 014 FIELD VERIFY DISTANCE NBS 5 A04a A050 Q I 20B1'•/ --N r 6" 15" =7 n 7 0 3 4 5 6 4' 66'6' 25' 50' POK 6'26' 4-30'-41 0 N i NOTES: ®=TWISTED WIRES INSULATED 1 TWIST PER FT. ALL TRACK WIRES 2C..6 TRANSMITTER ANO RECEIVER LEADS TO BE SEPARATED BY AT LEAST 12'1N TRENCH. LENGTHS SHOULD NOT EXCEED MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATION. TOP OF FOUNDATION TO BE AT SAME ELEVATION AS THE SURFACE OF THE TRAVELED WAY & NO MORE THAN 4'ABOVE THE SURFACE OF THE GROUND. ALL BUNGALOW WIRING TO BE •16 AWO FLEX UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ExCEPT ALL GROUND WIRE TO BE '6 AWG FLEX OR LARGER. ALL WIRING IN GATE MECHANISM TO BE '10 'AWG FLEX". REFER TO UP STANDARD DWG FOR BUNGALOW GROUNDING. PORTABLE GENERATOR EXTENSION LORD FOR 240V TO 240V 15 PROVIDED AS WELL AS A 120V TO 240v ADAPTER. ALL LIGHTS TO BE 12.ROUNDELS. 4'x 130'CONOULT LIGHTS[ LED LIGHTS GATE As 22' GATE Be 28' CANT C:28' CANT 0,28' GATE E:21' ■. =BELL 348HZ 8.3 km2 VISI+ O YEINI JR 06-20-00 HLF.E.05613 2 9 16 7 0 a. 3 4 8' CONN. SHY.3 CABLE TABULATION "B" 15• Veei- 6"❑nq AL I 1 TO EASTPORT 2156'25.5 SEC.C 49 M.P.H. IFIELO VERIFY 015TANCE FROM L HOUSE TO ROAD ANO RAIL. I APPROACH TO 25' MIRABEAH 9 70KWY• .P. 8054 A052 NBS 525HZ N&5 CONSTRUCTION NOTES, L CANTS 'C'AND b'ARE EXISTING.RELOCATE CANT Y'TO OTHER SIDE OF GATE 2.CANT 'C"WILL BE MOVED 8'WEST. 3.ORDER PART. 520-2524 FOR SIGNAL HOUSE. SHOP TO WIRE FOR MSM 70 SUPPLY GCP4000. BATTERIES ANO RECTIFIERS. 4_EXTRA MONEY NEEDED FOR RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT TO REMOVE POuREC FOUNDATION. 5.INSTALL NEW GATE 'E' CABLE NO.10 TO TRAFFIC CONTROLLER .ODrFI CAT ON LL WEL 0.A. LAST LEVEL CHECKED LAST LEVEL rtO THIS TYPICAL LAST LEVEL 00 OESI CNER CHANGED FROM TYPICAL? SL PI.N «II I 00 00 00 LJ41 C♦N 60CIF'I0 SIGNAL DESIGN O ES. 755 010. 775 CHIC. CJB • 05613 10'.823895.LX NEW SHEET CONNECTS TO DRAWING 9.70 SIMULTANEOUS PREEMPTION INTERCONNECTION TO TRAFFIC CONTROLLER SPOKANE.WASHINGTON PINES ROAD M.P.B.95 SPOKANE SUBDIVISION 13.0.7.'662 519S UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD SPOKANE.WASHINGTON HIGHWAY CROSSING SIGNALS CONTROL CIRCUITS 0rr1n.or$..w C-oI.'..•mo-5...11100 It..p_0.0..-p. DATE 6-20-00 SHEET 1 pvp 8.95 B-4823 __,\L_P\l775l7S\4123095.1, 11/2/2011 10'47',75 40 N r RAILROAD LOCATION PRINT I''-.*aa+ °E OF AN EXISTING AT-GRADE PUBLIC ROAD CROSSING if SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT s ',..._,-..---,=--'""' v, ....,,,,_1::,-,-,:c:-,---:„,--ii-- ' ' ' - t===,....=.=_____... __,,, li -r,-- A if--..>`'.2:-A---"..":(--,--- r---- p-------0 -----0 ,-- N a . a. -iii _.I � ''�� r`v _ � =LJ - � r;► Pines Road-DOT#662-9195 F w Lta--°1 (RR MP 8,91 -Spokane Subdivision , ,f = �� to)Ft_D ` `Existing At-Grade Public Road Crossing 5 i1 1 �_ ' �,,,k Signal Improvement Project ""i _�A- -� E /71C 9 E SHANN4ht AAV�E._4 1-+-I- - I x--r I '--4-4-4--1=1"- }—}-;±- Spokane Subdivision o �.. O _° 1 J .,z ---_-_,,_,,91.-,,,--- .-.—:..„IN©. NA AVe----= n- a��Jyq �[1�� (QE,,( 90 ."° " `�,.° j ; , 94 .E � ❑' t t s 1 VtI E NORA T1YC L i --------,..,),T .: — fk i!. z ------, vM ,- y -/-- pi E AtIGIJS'A:AVE ! t a E MISSIONNAAVE ____J _Gt-.-, _, E MISSION A iE _.1 li i; z ) <E't xf -- Ir E MAXWELL AVE _ �!! , I ID : A 1 �, a ------i p i, E SINTO AUE 1 Iii _a1 in 1 Iu? :._,_-� -a I E 6t3t tE AVE„___ �` a U, z, › __ tr�ml 3s oLr-v -1, I ice I S_METAVE, 4 1 ZI Z _, m .�1� A�i'AV x �'. iI I E CATALI)4 LN 1 1 = 70 I`Y; 41_E CATALDO AVEj # - I,- - � I ', CATAEDO AVE,1 a¢ 1-73— 4 I ;--. l 2 ? E:MALLON CT 1 l ii r-z I{: II ° I rl C; I� II' _. 11 ,f iI IF- , i it ,I DELORM * IN #t Data use subject to o NM (0 2007 DeLanro.Street Atlas LISA®2008. 1000 www.clelonne.com 4(15.5°E) Data Zoom 13-0 RAILROAD WORK TO BE PERFORMED: EXHIBIT "A” I. Install automatic flashing light crossing signals with gates and UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY upgrade cantilevers and LED lights. 2. Engineering Design review&Flagging. SPOKANE SUBDIVISION MILE POST 8.91 GPS:N 47°40.5515',W 117° 14.3948' SPOKANE VALLEY,SPOKANE CO.,WA. Railroad Location Print of an existing at-grade public road crossing signal improvement project with the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY. Folder No.717-64 Date:January 17,2011 WARNING IN ALL OCCASIONS,U.P.COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT MUST BE CONTACTED IN ADVANCE OF ANY WORK TO DETERMINE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF FIBER OPTIC CABLE. PHONE: 1-(800)336-9193 Exhibit A Railroad Location Print Of F. 4S9 FAtzt AGREEMENT covering reconstruction Property Department of the Pines Road grade crossing of Deed No. 14227 the Railroad' s main line at MP 8. 95, including installation of automatic RR WOP No. SI-91 grade crossing warning devices, near Trentwood, Spokane County, Washington PLD 120-18-38.7 8001:5.0251 • n THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the 30Zt day of 1977, by and between the SPOKANE INTERNATIONAL RAI OAD COMPANY, a Washington corporation (hereinafter called "Railroad") , and SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington (hereinafter called "Second Party") . ARTICLE I. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT. (1) Second Party, with the aid of Federal funds, has undertaken as its "project" , the reconstruction, widening and improvement of its public highway known as Pines Road at the Railroad' s main line at railroad milepost 8. 95, near. Trentwood, in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, including the installation of automatic grade crossing warning devices. That portion of the public highway upon, over and across the Railroad's right of way and tracks, including the approaches thereto, is hereinafter called "highway" . The highway and the Railroads right of way and facilities- are depicted on print D-6085 dated March 22, 1977, attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" , and by this reference incorporated herein. (2) Second Party has applied to the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission for authority to proceed with Second Party's project in WUTC docket No. TR-996. (3) The highway crosses the contiguous rights of way of the Railroad and Burlington Northern Inc. in the loca tion shown on Exhibit "A" . The work to be performed by .the Railroad includes the relay and rehabilitation of the Railroad's trackage throughout the crossing area, the installation of a seventy- . eight--foot True Temper T-Core structural crossing, and the ti installation of automatic cantilevered flashing light signals and gates activated by motion sensing devices on the northwest side of the Railroad' s right of way, together with interconnecting circuitry (hereinafter collectively called "warning devices") to interconnect said warning devices with cantilevered flashing light signals and gates activated by motion sensing devices on the southeast side of the right of way and tracks of Burlington PILED OR AMBIT' EDI - 1 - m Lev 10377 JAI! 25 3 30 PH 1811 TO SPuttAtiE uOUN11,WASiL. , ck Kt"489 rME • Northern Inc. , which said signals and gates shall also be interconnected by circuitry with the Railroad's warning devices. Second Party, by separate agreement with Burlington Northern Inc. , shall impose on Burlington Northern Inc. responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the warning devices and interconnecting circuitry to be installed by Burlington Northern Inc. , and the Railroad shall be a third party beneficiary of that agreement. ARTICLE II. •RIGHTS GRANTED. (1) So far as the Railroad lawfully may do so, the Railroad grants Second Party the right to construct, maintain, repair, renew and use said highway upon, over and across, and at common grade with that portion of the Railroad's right of way and tracks at railroad milepost- 8. 95 in the location tinted green on Exhibit "A" . (2) All said rights are granted subject to the terms, provisions, conditions, restrictions, limitations, covenants, reservations and exceptions contained in this agreement, including, without limitation, those set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and Second Party, in the exercise of said rights and in the conduct of Second Party' s project, shall and will do, keep, observe and perform each and • all of said terms, provisions, conditions, restrictions, limita- tions, covenants, reservations and exceptions. (3) As just compensation for the rights granted, Second Party shall pay the Railroad the sum of $250. 00. ARTICLE III. CONSTRUCTION WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY RAILROAD. Attached hereto, marked Exhibit "C", and by this reference incorporated herein, is an outline of work and estimate of cost of construction work to be performed by the Railroad subject to reimbursement by Second Party pursuant to Section 4 of Exhibit "B" . ARTICLE IV. INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF WARNING DEVICES. (1) The Railroad shall install, and thereafter shall operate and maintain the warning devices as required by law. However, in the event that any existing or future 2 - 10377 • YG.,489 FAH 9 • legislation makes Federal, state or other public funds available for the operation, maintenance, repair or replacement of warning devices at grade crossings, the Railroad shall have the benefit and advantage of said funds for the operation, maintenance, repair or replacement of the warning devices installed pursuant hereto. Second Party shall utilize Second Party' s best efforts, in cooperation. with the Railroad, to secure said funds. This agreement shall be supplemented and amended as necessary for the operation, maintenance, repair and replacement of said warning devices to qualify for such funds. In the event one or more of the warning devices installed under this agreement are partially or wholly destroyed and its or their replacement value, or cost of repair, cannot be recovered from the person or persons responsible for such destruction; or if said warning devices cannot, through age, be maintained or require replacement by .. virtue of their obsolescence, the parties shall apply for and utilize to the maximum extent permissible, such Federal, state or other public funds as may be designated and available for the purpose, and the balance of said cost of repair or replacement shall be borne on a ratio of fifty percent ( 50%) Second Party and fifty percent (50%) Railroad. If the damage to said signals is caused by highway traffic, . Second Party will cooperate with the Railroad in determining the location and identification of the parties responsible to the extent of making accident records available. (2) If for any reason, said warning devices shall no longer be required at said grade crossing, and, in the opinion of the Railroad, they are not obsolete, the Railroad, on the approval of Second Party, may remove said warning devices and reinstall them at some other grade crossing under the jurisdiction of Second Party on the tracks of the Railroad. If no other such crossing is agreed upon or prescribed by public authority, said warning devices shall be salvaged and . 'Second Party credited with the value of the salvage recovered, less the cost of removal. If said relocation is agreed upon by Second Party and the Railroad, and prescribed by public authority, the division of costs of such relocation shall be agreed upon between Second Party and the Railroad prior .to such removal. If for any reason said warning devices shall • no longer be required at said grade crossing, and in the opinion of the Railroad said warning devices are obsolete, the Railroad may remove said warning devices and credit Second Party with the value of salvage recovered, less cost of removal. • - 3 - • 10377 . CUR. 489 FAH 10- • (3) In the event that either railway or highway • improvement will necessitate a rearrangement or relocation or alteration of the existing warning devices at said crossing and in the opinion of the Railroad they are not obsolete, the party whose improvement causes such changes shall bear the entire cost thereof without expense to the other party. • ARTICLE V. MAINTENANCE OF CROSSING SURFACE. (1) Second Party, at Second Party's own expense, shall maintain' all 'paving in the crossing area and approaches, except the paving between the rails and for a distance of one foot outside the outer rails. (2) The Railroad, at the Railroad's own expense, shall maintain the crossing surface between the rails and for • a distance of one foot on the outside, of the outer rails. ARTICLE VI. EFFECTIVE DATE. - This agreement shall become effective as of the date first herein written, or as of the date on which work on the said project is commenced, whichever is earlier. ARTICLE VII. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. • This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors and assigns. • • • • - 4 -- • 10377 CFF.' 489 iiv:i ii YU. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Railroad has caused -this . agreement to be executed. by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized, and Second Party has executed this agreement by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized by Resolution No. 77•-.-5/9 • SPOKANE INTERNATIONAL RA.ILRaA' '.. t ATTEST: COMPANY n .: 4-• Q: oi- z - 1. .41 -;2,,,A, By ,..._iW,.,.,4).-"e"- 0...,,,.„-," • ...,-:,., 0*,,,,-:.-. :. . As •rs, t Secretary ' Ge' era( Manage;•_, .,., 4;% . • SPOKANE COUNTY by and through its • Board of County Commissioners • By. . 1 Cha.rman • ' ••c' :f ' ATTES .: .�' r. > (Seal) By ! _.�. /':t � _._• , T ? _ . I Commissioner -6. ,-:....4.06117_,I.A..) BalgAd R.441-42:4;4 ÷...- (t. tle) • Commissioner (attach resolution) • APPS ,TED' AS T r _ _. . . . 4:21 thus 44/ J ,.) !1 Jk • - 5 - • 10377 • erF • nt. 489 rAra 12 . ,. BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION No.7 7 519 IN THE MATTER OF AGREEMENT WITH THE SPOKANE INTERNATIONAL ) RESOLUTION RAILROAD COMPANY WHEREAS, It is the intention of the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, to cause the improvement of Pines Road from Interstate 90 to Trent Road by grading, draining, construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, asphalt concrete pavement and other work in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, This contemplated improvement will involve crossing of the Spokane International Railroad Company on Pines and improvement of the crossing by installation of signals, gates, and widening of the crossing which work will be done by the Railroad Company; and • WHEREAS, It is necessary that agreement be executed between the Railroad - Company and Spokane County covering this proposed work and the distribution of the cost therefor.. . • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, that the agreement between the Spokane International;RailrOdd • Company and Spokane County, concerning the crossing of Pines Road is hereby approved and the Chairman of the Board is hereby authorized to execute the . agreements by and on behalf of Spokane County. PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, this 19th day of May, 1977. • • • BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON • • JERRY C. KOPET, CHM. • HARRY M. LARNED HAY—'t.-- rirs4 ��6-�- ATTEST: VE NOd W. OHLAND . • OF TH ARD �• 12. 2 e'pl'e-& e/ BY DEPUTY • - - — - . 6} • }F?..489 rt 13 . ..p.:-..- . i` l . 5 - 0 • VACATED SHANNON R AO - R.R. R/ -r , '(:,ICS' 1` P.i `.4 PE.-:•::F�L:.`? !, SPOKANE LNTE.RNATIONAL R R. f TO SciolkostiE. . g • ,f B RtAN CON NORTHERN R.R.-- • R.R. R/v.1-+ _— -- C • Y... FREWes E WAY ovM S.NTRANCE \ „-. . . . . _ . . - .X : s "E 489 489 fr'E 14• e o r . 1 _ _ , r c S , ?5. 0 f .Z ' --- -- I • Z_ I�: N • - t . al . : . . LJ f • i 4 i i --- ,If°• 9HAt1,NON ROAR ) 11 .i _ ,.... t _ W . . Al j afLAX 111' E%I5T1NG 10 lb w/13 1 - I iza : :.....,:.,,,,,:„.., ,,_ ,., . . .i . _ — TO CC • Ke: ..a_. _. 77Ap ���� E L . p �~ ;W�71iL�ATEN(a 93� R1514 ii„PI ANA AVENUE t • — - -� --- - ■ •--FREEWAY Err . �� j SEC. ID 1 2.5 N. R44 E WM. • � U. I $. ;: :;:: 2 • .., ),Y --- --- - - — - - .. ■ _ E 085 • ( t 1 t - TIE'489 FACE 15 . •YC�I ---- - s. r i • • . • . t • r . . 1. - - • `o f G I£UR D'A.LENE- _ . _ _ o • �0 5E't.1O,T.2514.,R.4.4 E..ut.M: , .. ;4' EXHIBIT A• P SPOKANE INTERNA710NAL J1AILROAD • f - Nr. 7rentwood, Washington ' -- H. P. ti.95 • To accompany agreement with — _ _ _ Spokane County covering additional roadway rights and installation and maintenance of crossing protection at • • . Pines Road grade crossing. • --- Legend --- • install crossing and Yell crossing protection shown QIN u• • Rights for highway granted Snokane Cnunty shown- ---• • Green Off. of Dtvn, Engr. Albina, kiregon • scale: P. .. 5D' March 22, 1°77 . • :i% .•:*.: .'is• . VOL. 89 FAr€ 16 DL Section 1. RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF RIGHTS GRANTED. . (a) The rights hereunder are granted only insofar as- the Railroad lawfully may do so, and the Railroad makes no covenant or warranty of title, for • quiet possession or against encumbrances. Said rights are limited to use of the Railroad's property identified in Exhibit "A" and no other property; and Second Party, by virtue of this grant, shall not encroach upon, occupy or use any other property of the Railroad, and shall not permit others acting under Second Party's authority to encroach upon, occupy or use any other property of the Railroad. Second Party's use of said property and its maintenance, repair and renewal of the highway facilities thereon, shall be subject at all times to the safety measures set forth in Section 5 of this agreement. • (b) The rights granted to Second Party are only for the purposes specified and no others. Second Party shall not use or permit use. of•said property . or any part thereof for any other purpose. Without limiting the foregoing, Second Party shall not use or permit use of said property or any part thereof for railroad . purposes, or for gas, oil or gasoline pipelines. Second Party may construct lines on said property for the purpose of conveying electric power or communications incidental to Second Party's use of the property for highway purposes, provided such lines are constructed in accordance with the specifications and requirements of the Railroad and in such manner as not adversely to affect communication or signal lines of the Railroad or the Railroad's licensees now or hereafter located upon said property, No nonparty shall be admitted by Second Party to use or occupy any part of the Railroad's property for any purpose, except as specifically provided for herein, without the Railroad's written consent. Nothing herein shall obligate the Railroad to give such consent, which, if granted, may be subject to such terms and conditions as the Railroad, in the Railroad's sole discretion, may deem to be necessary or convenient. If at any time said property of the Railroad, or any part thereof, shall permanently cease to be used for the purposes aforesaid or shall be used for purposes unauthorized hereby, then the rights hereby granted as to such property or parts thereof shall cease and terminate. (c) If any property other than the property identified in Exhibit "A", or any rights other than granted herein are necessary for the construction, maintenance and use of the highway and its appurtenances, or for the performance of any work contemplated by this agreement, Second Party will acquire all such other property and rights at Second Party's own expense and without.expense to the Railroad. (d) The rights hereby granted are subject to any and, all encumbrances and rights (whether public or private) , irrespective of whether or not they are recorded, existing at the effective date of this agreement, and also to any and all extensions and renewals of said existing encumbrances and rights. Second Party shall not damage, destroy or interfere with the .property or rights of nonparties in, upon or relating to the Railroad's said property, unless Second Party, at Second Party's own expense, settles with and obtains release from such nonparties on mutually satisfactory terms. (e) The rights herein granted are subject and subordinate to the prior and continuing right and obligation of the Railroad, the Railroad's successors, and assigns, to use all the Railroad's property identified in Exhibit "A" in the performance of the Railroad's duty as a common carrier and for all lawful railroad purposes. The Railroad reserves the right to use and to grant to other parties the right to use said property for any and all purposes not inconsistent with the rights hereby granted. Said purposes include, but not by way of limitation, the right to construct, reconstruct, maintain, operate, repair, alter, renew and replace existing and additional wire lines, pipelines, roads, tracks, facilities and appurtenances, located or to be located either wholly or partly within said property, in such manner, however, as not to damage the highway facilities located • on said property; the right to attach signal, communication or power lines and facilities to any highway facilities located upon said property, subject, however, EXHIBIT "B" Page 1 of 7 VOF a.1409 FArE 17 to Second Party's policy on utility installations and approval by Second Party of detailed plans of the proposed attachment; and the right to use, occupy, cross and operate across said property and the highway facilities located thereon, with track equipment and off-track equipment. (f) Second Party will assume, bear and pay all taxes and assessments of whatsoever kind or nature (whether general, local or special) levied or assessed upon or against.the property Second Party is authorized to use pursuant hereto, • excepting taxes levied upon and against said property as a component part of the Railroad's operating property as a whole. (g) If.the rights granted Second Party pursuant to this agreement are for construction or improvement of a crossing of the railroad and highway at common grade, and if at any time the Railroad shall elect or be required by competent public . authority to• raise or lower the grade of all or any part of the Railroad's property upon which said crossing is constructed, Second Party shall at once alter and change that portion of said crossing to be constructed and maintained by Second Party so as to conform to the change of grade required by the Railroad, and the provisions hereof shall thereafter apply to such crossing as so changed. (h) If the rights granted Second Party pursuant to this agreement are for construction or improvement of a highway structure over the grade of the Railroad's right of way and tracks, no part of said grade separation structure to be constructed over the Railroad's property or right of way shall be affixed or connected at any point to the surface of the land, except as specifically provided herein or as authorized in writing by the Chief Engineer of the Railroad. Upon completion of construction work, Second Party shall furnish the Railroad two sets of prints of final approved drawings with "as constructed" information inserted thereon. Second Party shall make no alteration or-modification of Second Party's grade separation structure which would decrease the vertical clearance below the substructure of said grade separation structure, unless Second Party has the Railroad's prior written consent to such change in clearance. Section 2. CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF HIGHWAY AND APPURTENANCES.• (a) Second Party, at Second Party's own expense, will apply for and obtain all public authority required by law, ordinance, rule or regulation for the project contemplated by this agreement, and each 'and every part thereof, and•will furnish the Railroad upon request with satisfactory evidence that such authority. has• been obtained. All construction work by Second Party shall be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions imposed by said public authority in granting its approval, and in accordance with this agreement. (b) Except as may be otherwise specifically provided in this agreement, Second Party, at Second Party's own expense and without expense to the Railroad, will furnish all labor, material and equipment necessary for, and shall and will construct and complete said highway and all appurtenances thereof. Upon completion of the work, Second Party shall remove from the Railroad's property all temporary structures and falsework, and will leave said property in a condition satisfactory to the Railroad. Second Party,. at Second Party's own expense, and without expense to the Railroad, at all times shall and will keep and maintain the highway and all appurtenances thereof in good condition and repair so as not to jeopardize, damage or interfere with the Railroad's property, facilities or operations. As used in this agreement, "appurtenances" shall include, without limitation, all embankment slopes between the highway and the Railroad's tracks, all necessary and proper drainage facilities, all necessary and proper advance warning signs, standard pavement markings for railroad crossings, and all necessary and proper guardrails or barriers between the highway and the Railroad's tracks and facilities, which guardrails or barriers shall be of suitable design and adequate to confine highway traffic, and to protect the Railroad's property and facilities and any highway-rail • warning devices. EXHIBIT "B" Page 2 of 7 VOL. 489 FAEE 18 • (c) The Railroad will receive no ascertainable benefit from the construction of the project, and, except as may be specifically provided herein, shall not be required to pay or contribute any part of the cost thereof. If said project is to be financed in whole or in part by Federal funds, all construction work by Second Party shall be performed in accordance with the applicable Federal Act, Federal regulations and with this agreement. • (d) All construction work of Second Party upon the Railroad's property (including, but not limited to, .construction of the highway and all appurtenances and all related and incidental work) shall be performed and completed in a manner satisfactory to the Chief Engineer of the Railroad or his authorized representative and in accordance with detailed plans and specifications prepared by and at the expense of Second Party, and approved in writing by the Railroad's Chief Engineer. Said plans and specifications, and the work performed thereunder, shall be in accordance with the typical sections and notes pertaining to construction as set forth in Exhibit "A". (e) All construction work of Second Party shall be performed diligently and completed within a reasonable time, and in any event within three (3) years from the effective date of this agreement, or within such further period of time as may be specified in writing by the Railroad's, General Manager. No part of said work shall be suspended, discontinued or unduly delayed without the Railroad's written consent, and.subject to such reasonable conditions as the Railroad may specify. It is understood that the Railroad's tracks at and in the vicinity of the work will be in constant or frequent use during progress of the work and that movement or stoppage of trains, engines or cars may cause delays in the work of Second Party. Second Party hereby assumes the risk of any and all such delays and . agrees that no claims for damage on account of any delay shall be made against the Railroad. (f) If the project includes construction of a structure over which • trains are to be operated, or for which the Railroad has any responsibility for maintenance, Second Party shall furnish the Railroad permanent reproducible prints of all design and shop drawings as soon as possible after approval by the Chief Engineer of the Railroad or his authorized representative. Upon completion . of construction, Second Party shall furnish the Railroad two sets of "as constructed" prints and, in addition, upon request of the Chief Engineer of the Railroad, "as constructed" permanent reproducible prints of all or any portion of the structure. Section 3. INJURY AND DAMAGE. If Second Party,.in the performance of • any work contemplated by this agreement or by the failure to do or perform anything • for which Second Party is responsible under the provisions of this agreement, shall injure, damage or destroy any property of the Railroad or of any other corporation, person or firm lawfully occupying or using the property of the Railroad, such damage shall be restored by Second Party at Second Party's own expense and or by the Railroad at the expense of Second Party. Section 4. WORK TO BE DONE BY RAILROAD. (a) The Railroad may make any and all changes, alterations or relocations, • • whether temporary or permanent, and may provide flagging and other protective services and devices, which in the Railroad's judgment may be or become necessary or expedient because of the project. Such work shall include, without limitation, the work identified or described in the agreement to which this exhibit is attached and in other exhibits to this agreement. Second. Party will reimburse the Railroad for the entire cost and expense of performing all work in connection with the project pursuant to this agreement. (b) In the event this agreement involves the installation or alteration of automatic grade crossing signal devices, and the Railroad is unable to install or alter said devices without delay of Second Party's project, the Railroad may contract for the installation of said devices by other than railroad forces. The Railroad shall notify Second Party of the contract price within ninety (90) days after it is awarded, and Second Party shall reimburse the Railroad for the amount of the contract. EXHIBIT "B" . Page 3 of 7 - • • VOL. 489 PAGE 19 (c) If Second Party shall fail, refuse or neglect to do, keep, observe and perform each and all of the terms, provisions, conditions and covenants of • this agreement, the Railroad, in addition to any other rights and remedies the Railroad may have, may perform any work which in the judgment of the Railroad is necessary to place said highway and appurtenances in such condition as will not menace, endanger or interfere with the Railroad's facilities or operations or jeopardize the Railroad's employees; and Second Party will reimburse the Railroad for the expense thereof. • (d) Reimbursement for the use of railroad owned and operated equipment will be in accordance with Union Pacific Railroad Company's Billing and Contracts' Bulletin in effect on the date of use of such equipment. Rental rates for any item of equipment necessary to the job and not included in said Billing and Contracts' • Bulletin will be established on an individual basis and agreed to by the parties. Bills for reimbursement shall be paid by Second Party promptly upon receipt thereof, in the manner and at the time provided therein. The Railroad will submit to Second Party bills for flagging and other protective services and devices currently during progress of the work contemplated by this agreement. The Railroad will submit complete billing for flagging and other protective services within one hundred and . twenty (120) days after completion of the project, provided Second Party advises the Railroad of the- commencement of the 120-day period by giving the Railroad • written notification of completion of the project. (e) Subject to the foregoing, if the project is financed with Federal funds, under the Federal-Aid Highway Act, reimbursement of the Railroad by Second Party shall be in accordance with the provisions of Volume 1, Chapter 4, Section 3, of the Federal-Aid Highway Program Manual (FHPM) issued April 25, 1975 by the • • . United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and any amendments thereof or supplements thereto; provided, the use of said regulations as a guideline for reimbursement between the parties hereto shall not be deemed to require reimbursement of Second Party by the Federal Highway Administration as . • a condition precedent to Second Party's obligation. If Second -Party desires to - secure reimbursement from the Federal Highway Administration for all phases of the work performed by. the Railroad, it is the responsibility of Second Party to ensure • that interpretation of said regulations will permit Federal participation in the cost and expense of work which, pursuant hereto, is to be performed by the Railroad at the expense of Second Party. Section 5. SAFETY MEASURES. All work of Second Party contemplated by this agreement, including any work of maintenance of the highway facilities or appurtenances constructed on the Railroad's property pursuant to the rights granted • herein shall be performed and accomplished without interruption to or delay of operations of the Railroad or of others lawfully occupying or using their property or facilities, and without interruption to or delay of continuous railroad traffic. It is understood and recognized that safety and continuity of the Railroad's . ' operations and communications are of the'utmost'•importance; .and in order that the same may be adequately safeguarded, protected and assured, and in order that • accidents may be prevented and avoided, it is agreed with respect to all of said work of Second Party that: . (a) ' Seconnd Party shall- not do, stiffer•or permit anything which will dr may obstruct, endanger, interfere with, hinder or delay maintenance or operation - • bf the Railroad's tracks or facilities or any communication or signal lines, • installations or any appurtenances thereof. Second Party shall shelter and protect the Railroad's said property as required by the Railroad.. (b) Second Party, at Second Party's own expense, shall adequately police . and supervise all work to be performed by Second Party; shall regulate the conduct thereof in such manner that the prosecution thereof will not endanger,-interfere • with, hinder or delay operations of the Railroad or of others lawfully using or occupying the Railroad's property or facilities; and shall not inflict injury to persons or damage to property for the safety of whom or of which the Railroad or such others may be responsible, or to property of the Railroad or such others. EXHIBIT "B" Page 4 of 7 ' i err. 489 FACE 20 (c) If at any time Second Party's engineers and the Chief Engineer of the Railroad or their respective representatives shall be of the opinion that any work of Second Party is being or is about to be done or prosecuted without due regard and precaution for safety and security, Second Party shall cause such work to be suspended until suitable, adequate and proper protective measures are adopted and provided. (d) Second Party shall not cause, suffer or permit material or debris to be deposited or cast upon, or to slide or fall upon any property or facilities of the Railroad in connection with or as a result of the project or any work • contemplated by this agreement; and any such material and debris shall be promptly removed from the Railroad's property by Second Party at Second Party's own expense or by the Railroad at- the expense of Second Party, and any damage •caused thereby shall be promptly restored and repaired by Second Party at Second Party's own ' • expense, or by the Railroad at the expense of Second Party. Second Party shall. not cause, suffer or permit any snow to be plowed or cast upon the Railroad's property during the course of Second Party's operations of removing snow from Second Party's highway. (e) Second Party shall not discharge any explosives on or in the vicinity of the Railroad's property (i) if, in the sole discretion of the Railroad's Chief Engineer, such discharge would be dangerous or would interfere with the Railroad's property or facilities; and (ii) unless adequate notice thereof is given to the Railroad. For the purposes hereof, the "vicinity of the Railroad's property" shall be deemed to be any place in such close proximity to the Railroad's property that the discharge of explosives could cause injury to the Railroad's employees or other persons on the Railroad's property, or cause damage to or interference with the facilities or operations on the Railroad's property. Unless the Railroad's Chief Engineer shall agree to a shorter notice with respect to a particular proposed discharge of explosives, "adequate notice" shall be deemed to require not less than forty-eight (48) hours' notice, exclusive of weekends and holidays. The Railroad reserves the right to impose such conditions, restrictions or limitations on the transportation, handling, storage, security and use of explosives as the Railroad, in the Railroad's sole discretion, may deem to be necessary, desirable or appropriate. In addition to any conditions, restrictions or limitations as may be specifically imposed: (1) Any explosives loaded in holes or placed or otherwise readied for discharge on a day shall be discharged on the same day during daylight hours, and at such times and in such manner as will not endanger the Railroad's employees or property or interfere with the Railroad's operations. (2) Second Party, at Second Party's own expense, shall take all measures and precautions and construct all temporary shelters necessary to guard and protect the Railroad's employees, property, facilities and operations against danger of damage, destruction or interference arising• out of or connected with any blasting or any transportation, handling, storage, security or use of explosives on or in the vicinity of the Railroad's tracks, property or operations. (3) Second Party shall require at all times that explosives be transported, handled, stored or otherwise secured and used in a manner satisfactory to the Railroad and in accordance with local, state and Federal laws, rules and regulations, including, without limitation, United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Standards, Safety and Health Regulations for Construction, 29 CFR Part 1518, Subpart U---"Blasting and the Use of Explosives"; and Occupational Safety and Health Administration Occupational Safety and Health Standards, 29 CFR Part 1910, Subpart H-0"Hazardous Materials". (f) Second Party shall not place any combustible material upon or about the premises of the Railroad, nor erect any structure thereon (except as herein otherwise provided) , nor cause or permit the view along the tracks of the Railroad to be obstructed, nor obstruct or interfere with the-drainage ditches, drainage. facilities or water facilities of the Railroad. EXHIBIT "B" Page 5 of 7 • EFF 7 489 FAH 22 YGL. • (g) If Second Party shall excavate from existing slopes adjacent to the tracks of the Railroad or create new slopes in the performance Of any work contemplated hereby, Second Party shall so excavate from existing slopes and construct new slopes that the pitch of same shall not be excessive, nor create undue hazards of slides or falling rock, nor impair or endanger the clearance between said existing or new slopes and the tracks of the Railroad. (h) Second Party, at Second Party's own expense, shall provide and maintain suitable facilities for draining the highway and its appurtenances, and shall not suffer or permit drainage water therefrom to flow or collect upon property of the Railroad. Second Party, at Second Party's own expense, shall provide adequate passageway for- the waters of any streams, bodies of water and drainage facilities (either natural or artificial, and including water from the Railroad's culverts and drainage facilities) , so that said waters may not because of any facilities or work • of Second Party be impeded, obstructed, diverted or caused to back up, overflow or damage the property of the Railroad or any part thereof, or property of others. (i) Before commencing any construction or other substantial work contemplated by this agreement, Second Party shall notify the Superintendent of the Railroad of the time when such work shall commence. Said notice shall be given not less than forty-eight (48) hours,- exclusive of weekends and holidays, prior to the time work is to commence. Second Party shall cooperate with the Railroad in every reasonable way for the adequate protection of the Railroad's facilities and operations during progress of the work. (j) . Second Party shall not do or cause to be done in the performance of any work contemplated hereby, anything which will or may disturb the stability of any area so as to adversely affect the tracks or facilities of the Railroad. (k) Second Party, at Second Party's own expense, shall and will install • and. maintain. adequate shoring and cribbing for all excavation and/or trenching performed by Second Party in connection with construction, maintenance or other work of any kind contemplated by this agreement. Said shoring and cribbing shall be constructed and maintained with such materials and in such manner as to withstand all stresses likely to be encountered, including, but not by way of limitation, any stresses resulting from vibration caused by the Railroad's operations at or in the vicinity of such work; and such shoring and cribbing shall be installed and maintained in a manner satisfactory to the Chief Engineer of the Railroad or his authorized representative. (1) The responsibility of Second Party for safe conduct and adequate policing and supervision of the project shall not be lessened or otherwise affected by the Railroad's approval of plans and specifications, or by the Railroad's collaboration in performance of any work, or by the presence at the worksite of • the Railroad's representatives, or by compliance by Second Party with any requests or recommendations made by such representatives. If a'representative of the ' Railroad is assigned to the project, Second Party will give due consideration to suggestions and recommendations made by such representative for the safety and protection of the Railroad's property and operations. Section 6. INSURANCE. (a) Before work is commenced on the project, and thereafter before commencement by any contractor for Second Party of any maintenance work on the highway in the vicinity of the Railroad's said trackage and facilities, Second Party, without expense to the Railroad, shall furnish and deliver to the Railroad, or shall require each of Second Party's contractors to furnish and deliver to the Railroad, a public liability and property damage insurance policy or policies in favor of the Railroad; and Second Party, without expense to the Railroad, at all times during progress of and until final completion of the project, and until completion of such maintenance work, shall keep and maintain, or cause Second Party's contractors to keep and maintain, such policy or policies in full force and effect. The Railroad, upon request of Second Party, may purchase any such policy for which Second Party is responsible pursuant hereto, and Second Party shall reimburse the Railroad for the full amount of the cost of such policy. EXHIBIT "B" Page 6 of 7 • X1. 489 .FHSE 22 • • • (b) Said public liability insurance shall provide for a maximum limit of not less than FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($500,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of one person, and subject to that limit for each person, a total maximum limit of ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of more than one person in • any one occurrence. Said property damage insurance shall provide for a maximum limit of not less than FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($500,000) for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property in any one occurrence, and • • subject to that limit, a total (or aggregate) maximum limit of ONE •MILLION • DOLLARS ($1,000,000) for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property during the period of work. (c) The terms "person" or "persons" as herein used shall include employees of the Railroad, as well as other persons, and the term "property" as herein Used shall include, as well as other property, property owned by and property in the care, custody or control of the Railroad. (d) Each such insurance policy shall be issued by, a reliable insurer satisfactory to the Railroad and authorized to do business in the state in which • the work is to be performed, and each such policy shall be in form and substance - satisfactory.to the Railroad. The.original and one.true and complete copy of . said policy or policies shall be delivered to and remain in the possession of the Railroad. (e) Each such policy or policies shall conform substantially with the Public Liability and Property Damage Policy provided in United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway.Administration directives as published in its - . Federal-Aid Highway Program Manual, Volume 6, Chapter 6, Section 2, Subsection 2. Each such policy or policies shall cover all work to be performed and all operations . to be conducted under this agreement. The monetary limits of insurance furnished in connection with the future reconstruction or maintenance work on the highway in the vicinity of the Railroad's said trackage and facilities shall conform to the limits prescribed by the Railroad in connection with new public .projects at • the time the work of maintenance or reconstruction is performed. (f) In addition to the above insurance, and before work is.commenced. on' the project, Second Party, without expense to the Railroad, shall• furnish and deliver to the Railroad, or shall require Second Party's contractor to furnish and deliver to the Railroad, a certificate certifying as to the contractor's regular property damage insurance.with respect to said contractox'.s own.operations and, in addition,'with respect to operations performed for said contractor by subcontractors under this agreement, with limits of not less than FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($500,000) arising out of injury to or destruction of property in any one occurrence, and subject to that limit per occurrence, a total, or aggregate, limit of not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) for all damages arising out of injury to two or•more persons in any one occurrence or destruction of property during the policy period. Each such certificate shall apply to all policies covering work to be performed and all operations to be conducted under this agreement, and shall be kept in full force and effect until completion of the project. Such certificate shall also contain a provision that the policy shall not be cancelled or changed without giving thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the"Railroad. • Section 7. OTHER RAILROADS. All protective and indemnifying provisions of this agreement shall inure to the benefit of the Railroad and any other railroad company or companies at any time lawfully using the Railroad's property or facilities. Section 8. WORK OF SECOND PARTY INCLUDES WORK BY CONTRACTORS. All references in this agreement to work of Second Party shall be deemed to include Second Party's contractors, subcontractors, officers, agents and employees, .and • others, acting under their authority, and shall include such work, not only within • the Railroad's property but also in the vicinity thereof but outside of the Railroad's property. EXHIBIT "B" Page 7 of 7 Sheet 1 of 2 23 . Wit. 489 nr EXHIBIT "C" • MATERIAL AND FORCE ACCOUNT ESTIMATE FOR ' SPOKANE COUNTY Install cantilever-type flashing-light crossing signal with gate interconnected with Burlington Northern, Inc. , signal, • install 78 foot True Temper T-Core structural crossing, relay • 117 .feet through crossing, and remove existing crossing at • M.P. 8. 95 near Trentwood, Washington. Oregon Division - April 13, 1977 . DOT No. 662 - 519S . (WOP 91) . JOB No. DESCRIPTION LABOR MATERIAL TOTAL 001 Automatic Signals Engineering . $ 2200 Labor additives • • • 946 3146 $ 3,146 002 Automatic signals 83S0 $ 20964 • Labor additive • . 3608 Contingencies 839 5246 . Equipment rental • 1680 • '$12837 $ 27890 $ 40,727 . 603 Crossing - Roadway-78 TF ' Install True Temper T-Core crossing $ 1560 • $ 8190 ' • Remove existing crossing 200 Freight • • . 31 : •Labor & material additives 757 . 410 . Contingencies ' 176 822 Equipment rental • • 500 $ 2693 $ 9953 $ 12, 646 004 Relay through crossing-117 TF • Relay rail 133# S.N. $ 1528 $ 3038 • Jt. comp. 133#/90# 450 Equipment rental 200 •. • $ 1528 $ 3688 $ 5,216 005 Reballast track 24 CY $ 98 $ 42 Labor Additive 42 . • • Contingencies 10 4 $ 150 . $ 46 $ . 196 TOTAL • . $20,354 • • • $41,577 • $ 61,931 • a. 1 . Sheet 2 of 2 VUL. 489'EASE 24 Salvage Credit Allowed County • Rail 90V 234 L.F. @ .60 = $140 ' . • OTM 16. 5 CWT @ 1. 50 =. 25 - . $165 • , Flagging or Roadway Watchman services performed for the County's - contractor will be reported on Form 1054, "Labor Report" , re- collectible from the County. - • The above cost figures are estimates only and are subject to fluctuation. In the event of increase or decrease in the cost of materials or wages paid labor, the County will be billed according to the current rates effective thereof. • CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 20th, 2012 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business [' new business [' public hearing [' information ® admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: STA Agreement - Sidewalk and Transit Accessibility Project #0154 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: This item was part of the Admin Report for 2011 New Freedom Call for Projects brought before council on February 8th, 2011. Council gave consensus to submit New Freedom Applications to SRTC. On February 14th, 2012 an Info RCA was provided in council's packet. BACKGROUND: On January 19, 2011 the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) issued a New Freedom Call for Projects for allocation of Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5317 funding. STA is the designated recipient for FTA funds. The funding level for Spokane County was approximately $252,000. Project applications were due February 15th, 2011. New Freedom funds are targeted towards projects and programs that provide new or enhanced public transportation and public transportation alternatives for individuals with disabilities in both rural and urban areas. Eligible capital projects include sidewalks, accessible bus stops and shelters. Although these federal funds (available through STA) and the City matching funds, do not help our street preservation efforts, this project will improve access to several public transit routes and provide opportunities for bus shelters, which benefit many of our citizens. Staff evaluated the New Freedom grant criteria and identified projects that have the highest potential to receive funding and greatest benefit to pedestrians and bus riders and submitted the grant application. The project was selected for funding. City employees coordinated with STA and FTA developing site plans and receiving a categorical exclusion on the environmental impacts of the project. FTA and STA approved the authorization of funding for improvements set forth in the grant application. However, STA later learned that the total amount of funds available was $178,790; less than originally anticipated. Attached is the agreement between STA and Spokane Valley for the use of Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funds. Public Works and Legal staff reviewed the agreement and provided comments to STA. All comments from Spokane Valley were relatively minor and have been incorporated into the attached agreement. OPTIONS: Admin Report Only RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Admin Report Only 1 BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The required match on New Freedom funded projects is 20%. With a total grant amount of $178,790, a 20% match from the city is $44,698. This brings the total project budget to $223,488. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, PE — Senior Capital Projects Engineer Neil Kersten, AIA— Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: 1) February 2012 Agreement with STA for New Freedom Funds, 2) Project Vicinity Map. 2 Grant Management Agreement Designated Recipient/Grant Manager Grant Recipient Spokane Transit Authority City of Spokane Valley 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 1229 W. Boone Avenue Spokane Valley,WA 99206 Spokane,WA 99201 Contact: Gordon Howell (509) 325-6058 Contact: Steve Worley (509) 720-5014 Project Costs Federal Funds $ 178,790 State Funds $ 0 Subrecipient Funds $ 44,698 Total Funds $ 223,488 Grant Number: Scope of Project: As set forth in Exhibit I, Scope of WA-57-X014—"Sidewalk& Transit Access" - Project and Budget, attached and incorporated by this FTA New Freedom Grant reference. Term of Project: 8/10/2011 through the Service Area: City of Spokane Valley,Washington estimated completion date of 6/30/2013. THIS GRANT AGREEMENT, hereinafter "AGREEMENT", is entered into by Spokane Transit Authority, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter"STA," and the City of Spokane Valley,Washington, a non-charter code city of the State of Washington,hereinafter"COSV"or"GRANT RECIPIENT";and WHEREAS, STA is the Designated Recipient of certain federal grant funding authorized under 49 U.S.C. chapter 53, and specifically,grants awarded by the Federal Transit Administration(FTA)under 49.U.S.C. §5317;and WHEREAS, through a local process, COSV is the locally selected recipient of an FTA New Freedom grant, identified as Grant No.WA-57-X014—"Sidewalk&Transit Access",(also referred to as"Grant")funding authorized under 49 U.S.C. § 5317, and any subsequent amendments and resolutions thereto;and WHEREAS, STA, as the Designated Recipient, is responsible for the administration and management of COSV's use of the proceeds of Grant No. WA-57-X014 pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 5317 and will reimburse COSV for costs incurred in completion of the Sidewalk&Transit Access project using Grant proceeds,upon determination of COSV's compliance with Grant requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions,performances and mutual covenants herein set forth and the attached Exhibit I, "Scope of Project and Budget," which is incorporated and made a part hereof, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Purpose of Agreement and Definition of Terms The purpose of this AGREEMENT is to facilitate STA's provision of grant management services to COSV for FTA Grant Agreement No.WA-57-X014 funding awarded for the construction of sidewalks and transit stop accessibility improvements to be used in the provision of transportation services to the residents and people within the City of Spokane Valley,hereinafter referred to as the "Project." Capitalized terms used in this Agreement shall have the same meaning and definitions as set forth in FTA Grant Agreement No WA-57-X014. Section 2 Scope of Project The GRANT RECIPIENT shall undertake and complete the construction of the sidewalk and transit stop accessibility improvements as detailed in Exhibit I, "Scope of Project and Budget," which is by this reference fully incorporated herein as if fully set out in this AGREEMENT, and construct the improvements within the area described in the caption space header above titled"Service Area",in accordance with the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT. The caption space header titled"Service Area"and all caption space headers above by this reference are incorporated herein as if fully set out in this AGREEMENT. Page 1 of 16 Section 3 Term of Project The Project period of this AGREEMENT shall begin on the date shown in the caption space header above titled "Term of Project"and continues through the end of the completion of the Project. Section 4 Grant Recipient's Project Cost Funds The Federal Funds available for the Project shall not exceed the amount indicated in the caption space header above titled "Project Costs." The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to expend"Contractor Funds"allocated for the Project in an amount sufficient, when added together with the "Federal Funds" allocated for the Project, to ensure payment of eligible expenses as described in Exhibit I, "Scope of Project and Budget" of this AGREEMENT. The GRANT RECIPIENT further agrees that there shall be no reduction in the amount specified as the "Contractor Funds" unless there is a concurrent proportional reduction in the "Federal Funds"or STA pre-approves the reduction in writing. If at any time the GRANT RECIPIENT becomes aware that the cost which it expects to incur in the performance of this AGREEMENT will exceed or be substantially less than the amount indicated in the caption space header above titled "Project Costs", the GRANT RECIPIENT shall notify STA promptly in writing to that effect. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees that"Project Costs"eligible for Federal participation and"Contractor Funds"used as a match to FTA funds,must comply with the standards of OMB Circular A-87,Revised,"Cost Principles for State and Local Governments." Section 5 Construction Inspection Throughout the term of this AGREEMENT,the GRANT RECIPIENT shall complete construction of the sidewalk and transit stops ("Project Improvements") pursuant to this AGREEMENT. Upon completion of the Project Improvements, the GRANT RECIPIENT shall fully inspect the Project Improvements to ensure that the improvements comply with all regulations,rules, and laws and meet the design and engineering plans for the Project. Section 6 Miscellaneous Charges and Conditions The GRANT RECIPIENT shall pay and be solely responsible for all charges,late fees and fines,as well as any fees(including permits and inspection fees) and taxes, which may be imposed with respect to said Project. All replacements, repairs, or substitutions of parts or equipment shall be at the cost and expense of the GRANT RECIPIENT. Section 7 Payment A. STA,using FTA grant funds, shall reimburse the GRANT RECIPIENT's allowable expenses incurred in completing the Project described in Exhibit I,"Scope of Project and Budget." Allowable Project expenses shall be determined by STA based on FTA and other applicable federal guidelines. B. Payment will be made by STA on a reimbursable basis.Payment is subject to the submission to and approval by STA of appropriate invoices,reports,and financial summaries. Any financial summaries submitted to STA must include a record of the actual Project net costs. C. The GRANT RECIPIENT's final payment request for"Funds"must be received by STA,within thirty(30)days of the completion of the Project or within thirty(30)days of the termination of this AGREEMENT,whichever is sooner. Any payment request after this time will not be eligible for reimbursement. Section 8 Subcontracts The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to include Sections 9 through 25 of this AGREEMENT in each subcontract financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA;and in all contracts it enters into for the employment of any individuals, procurement of any materials,or the performance of any work to be accomplished under this AGREEMENT, subject to the limitations set forth in Sections 19C.2 and D.2 of this AGREEMENT. It is further agreed that those clauses shall not be modified, except to identify the subcontractor or other person or entity that will be subject to its provisions. In addition,the following provision shall be included in any advertisement or invitation to bid for any procurement by the GRANT RECIPIENT under this AGREEMENT: Statement of Financial Assistance- This AGREEMENT is subject to a financial assistance contract between the City of Spokane Valley and the Federal Transit Administration. Section 9 Reports A. Reports. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall advise STA regarding the progress of the Project at such times and in such manner as STA and FTA may require,including,but not limited to,interim reports. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall keep satisfactory Page 2 of 16 written records with regard to the construction and equipment and shall submit the following reports to, and in a form and at such times prescribed by,STA until the Project is completed. 1.The GRANT RECIPIENT shall provide to STA periodic reports describing the progress of construction improvements as described in"Scope of Project and Budget"in Exhibit I hereto. 2.The GRANT RECIPIENT shall collect and submit to STA,at such time as STA may require,such financial statements, data,records,contracts,and other documents related to the Project as may be deemed necessary by STA and FTA. B. Remedies for Misuse or Noncompliance. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall not perform the construction of the Project in a manner different from that set forth in Exhibit I,"Scope of Project and Budget,"and the"Service Area"identified in the AGREEMENT. FTA may require STA to withhold Grant payments should it determine that the GRANT RECIPIENT has failed to comply with any provision of this AGREEMENT. If Federal participation and funding is either reduced or canceled as a result of a breach by the GRANT RECIPIENT,the GRANT RECIPIENT is then liable for all damages from the breach,even though those damages exceed the price payable under this AGREEMENT. Section 10 General Compliance Assurance The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to give reasonable guarantees that it and its subcontractors or third party contractors under this AGREEMENT,will comply with all requirements imposed by,or pursuant to,the Federal Transit Act including any amendments thereto,and the Federal Regulations. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with the provisions of 49 C.F.R. Part 18 and the"Common Rule"as defined in OMB Circular A-87. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees that the United States,any agency thereof,STA and any of STA's representatives,have not only the right to monitor the compliance of the GRANT RECIPIENT with the provisions of this assurance,but also have the right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under the Federal Transit Act,the Federal Regulations,and this assurance. It is understood by the GRANT RECIPIENT that this assurance obligates the GRANT RECIPIENT and any transferee of the GRANT RECIPIENT,or said transferee's successor(s),for the term of the Project. Section 11 Procurement The GRANT RECIPIENT shall follow procurement procedures approved in advance by STA and consistent with the following provisions: A. General Procurement Requirements. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall comply with third party procurement requirements of 49 U.S.C.chapter 53 and other applicable Federal Laws in effect now or as subsequently enacted;with U.S.DOT third party procurement regulations of 49 C.F.R. § 18.36 and other applicable Federal Regulations pertaining to third party procurements and subsequent amendments thereto.The GRANT RECIPIENT shall also comply with the provisions of FTA Circular 4220.1.F, "Third Party Contracting Requirements,"November 1,2008 and any later revision thereto,except to the extent FTA determines otherwise in writing,which by this reference are incorporated herein,and any reference therein to"Grantee"shall mean GRANT RECIPIENT.The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees that it may not use FTA assistance to support its third party procurements unless there is satisfactory compliance with Federal laws and regulations. B. Full and Open Competition.In accordance with 49 U.S.C. §5325(a),the GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to conduct all procurement transactions in a manner that provides full and open competition as determined by FTA. C. Exclusionary or Discriminatory Specifications.Apart from inconsistent requirements imposed by Federal laws or regulations,the GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. § 5325(h)by not expending or otherwise using any Federal assistance awarded to support a procurement using exclusionary or discriminatory specifications. D. Method of Acquisition.In compliance with 49 U.S.C. §5325(f),the GRANT RECIPIENT agrees that any third party contract award made for rolling stock will be based on initial capital costs,or on performance,standardization,life cycle costs,and other factors,or on a competitive procurement process. E. Preference for United States Products and Services. To the extent applicable,the GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with the following U.S.preference requirements: 1. Buy America. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with 49 U.S.C. § 5323(j),with FTA regulations,"Buy America Requirements,"49 C.F.R.Part 661,and any later amendments thereto. 2. Cargo Preference—Use of United States-Flag Vessels. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with 46 App. U.S.C. §55305 and U.S.Maritime Administration regulations,"Cargo Preference—U.S.-Flag Vessels,"46 C.F.R.Part 381,to the extent those regulations apply to the Project. Page 3 of 16 3. Fly America. The GRANT RECIPIENT understands and agrees that the Federal Government will not participate in the costs of international air transportation of any persons involved in or property acquired for the Project unless that air transportation is provided by U.S.-flag air carriers to the extent service by U.S.-flag air carriers is available,in accordance with the International Air Transportation Fair Competitive Practices Act of 1974,as amended,49 U.S.C. §40118,and with U.S. GSA regulations, "Use of United States Flag Air Carriers,"41 C.F.R. §§301-10.131 through 301-10.143. F. Pre-Award and Post-Delivery Requirements. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. §5323(m)and FTA regulations,"Pre-Award and Post-Delivery Audits of Rolling Stock Purchases,"49 C.F.R.Part 663, and any revision thereto. G. Geographic Restrictions. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to not use any State or Local geographic preference,except those expressly mandated or encouraged by Federal Statute or as permitted by FTA. H. Preference for Recycled Products. To the extent applicable,the GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(U.S.EPA),"Comprehensive Procurement Guideline for Products Containing Recovered Materials",40 C.F.R.Part 247,which implements section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act,as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act,as amended,42 U.S.C. §6962.Accordingly,the GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to provide a competitive preference for products and services that conserve natural resources,protect the environment,and are energy efficient, except to the extent that the Federal Government determines otherwise in writing. I. National Intelligent Transportation Systems Architecture and Standards.To the extent applicable,the GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to conform to the National Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITS)Architecture and Standards as required by SAFETEA-LU §5307(c),23 U.S.C. § 512 note,and follow the provisions of FTA Notice,"FTA National ITS Architecture Policy on Transit Projects,"66 Fed.Reg. 1455 et seq.,January 8,2001,and any other implementing directives FTA may issue at a later date,except to the extent FTA determines otherwise in writing. J. Government Orders. In case any lawful government authority shall make any order with respect to the Project,or any part thereof,or the PARTIES hereto or either PARTY,the GRANT RECIPIENT shall cooperate with STA in carrying out such order and will arrange its operation and business so as to enable STA to comply with the terms of the order. Section 12 Incorporation of Federal Terms A. Purchasing. This AGREEMENT's provisions include, in part, certain Standard Terms and Conditions required by FTA, whether or not expressly set forth herein. All contractual provisions as set forth in FTA Circular 4220.1F are hereby incorporated by reference. All FTA mandated terms shall be deemed to control in the event of a conflict with other provisions contained in this AGREEMENT. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall not perform any act, fail to perform any act, or refuse to comply with any STA request,which would cause STA to be in violation of any FTA term or condition. B. Federal Changes. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall at all times comply with all applicable FTA regulations, policies, procedures and directives, whether or not they are referenced in this AGREEMENT and agrees to include any amendments promulgated by the FTA,during the term of this AGREEMENT. The GRANT RECIPIENT's failure to so comply shall constitute a material breach of this AGREEMENT. Section 13 No Obligation by the Federal Government A. STA and the GRANT RECIPIENT acknowledge and agree that,regardless of any concurrence by the Federal Government or approval of the solicitation or award of this AGREEMENT,the Federal Government is not a party to this AGREEMENT and shall not be subject to any obligations or liabilities to the GRANT RECIPIENT,subcontractor,lessee or any other participant at any tier of the Project(whether or not a PARTY to this AGREEMENT)pertaining to any matter resulting from this AGREEMENT. B. No contract between the GRANT RECIPIENT and its subcontractors,lessees,or any other participant at any tier of the Project shall create any obligation or liability of STA with regard to this AGREEMENT without STA's specific written consent, notwithstanding its concurrence in,or approval of,the award of any contract or subcontract or the solicitations thereof. The GRANT RECIPIENT hereby agrees to include this provision in all contracts it enters into for the employment of any individuals, procurement of any materials,or the performance of any work to be accomplished under this AGREEMENT. Page 4 of 16 Section 14 Personal Liability of Public Officers No officer or employee of STA shall be personally liable for any acts or failure to act in connection with this AGREEMENT, it being understood that in such matters they are acting solely as agents of STA. Section 15 Ethics A. Code of Ethics. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to maintain a written code or standards of conduct that shall govern the performance of its officers,employees,board members,or agents engaged in the award and administration of contracts, subagreements,leases,third party contracts,or other arrangements supported by Federal assistance. The code or standards shall provide that the GRANT RECIPIENT's officers,employees,board members,or agents may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors,or anything of monetary value from any present or potential subcontractor,lessee,sub-recipient,or participant at any tier of the Project,or agent thereof. The GRANT RECIPIENT may set de-minimis rules where the financial interest is not substantial,or the gift is an unsolicited item of nominal intrinsic value. These codes or standards shall prohibit the GRANT RECIPIENT's officers,employees,board members,or agents from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest or personal gain. As permitted by State or Local Law or Regulations,such code or standards shall include penalties,sanctions,or other disciplinary actions for violations by the GRANT RECIPIENT's officers, employees,board members,or agents,or by subcontractors,lessees or sub-recipients,other participants or their agents. The GRANT RECIPIENT must fully comply with all the requirements and obligations of Chapter 42.52 RCW that govern ethics in State and Local Governments. 1. Personal Conflict of Interest. The GRANT RECIPIENT's code or standards shall prohibit the GRANT RECIPIENT's employees,officers,board members,or agents from participating in the selection,award,or administration of a contract supported by"Federal Funds"if a real or apparent conflict of interest would be involved. Such a conflict would arise when any of the parties set forth below has a financial or other interest in the firm or entity selected for award: a. The employee,officer,board member,or agent; b. Any member of his or her immediate family; c. His or her partner;or d. An organization that employs,or is about to employ,any of the above. 2. Organizational Conflict of Interest. The GRANT RECIPIENT's code or standard of conduct must include procedures for identifying and preventing real and apparent organizational conflicts of interest. An organizational conflict of interest exists when the nature of the work to be performed under a proposed third party contract,subagreement,lease,or other arrangement at any tier may,without some restrictions on future activities,result in an unfair competitive advantage to the third party contractor or impair its objectivity in performing the work under this AGREEMENT. B. Debarment and Suspension. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply and assures the compliance of each sub-recipient, lessee,third party contractor,or other participant at any tier of the Project with the requirements of Executive Orders Numbers 12549 and 12689,"Debarment and Suspension,"31 U.S.C. §6101 note,and U.S.DOT regulations"Non-procurement Suspension and Debarment"2 C.F.R.Part 1200,which adopts and supplements the provisions of U.S.Office of Management and Budget (U.S.OMB)"Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension(Non-procurement),"2 C.F.R.Part 180.The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to and assures that its sub-recipients,lessees,third party contractors,and other participants at any tier of the Project will review the"Excluded Parties Listing System"at http://epls.arnet.gov/before entering into any third subagreement,lease,third party contract,or other arrangement in connection with the Project. C. Bonus or Commission. The GRANT RECIPIENT affirms that it has not paid,and agrees not to pay,any bonus or commission to obtain approval of its application for Federal financial assistance for this Project. D. Relationships with Employees and Officers of STA. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall not extend any loan,gratuity or gift of money in any form whatsoever to any employee or officer of STA, nor shall the GRANT RECIPIENT rent or purchase any Equipment and materials from any employee or officer of STA. E. STA Restrictions on Lobbying. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to: 1. Comply with 31 U.S.C. § 1352(a)and will not use Federal assistance to pay the costs of influencing any officer or employee of a Federal agency,Member of Congress,officer of Congress or employee of a member of Congress,in connection with making or extending this Grant AGREEMENT;and 2. Comply,and assure compliance by each subcontractor at any tier,each lessee at any tier and each sub-recipient at any tier,with applicable requirements of U.S.DOT regulations,"New Restriction on Lobbying,"49 C.F.R.Part 20,modified as necessary by 31 U.S.C. §1352;and Page 5 of 16 3. Comply with Federal statutory provisions to the extent applicable prohibiting the use of Federal assistance Funds for activities designed to influence Congress or a state legislature on legislation or appropriations,except through proper, official channels. G. Employee Political Activity. To the extent applicable,the GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with the provisions of the "Hatch Act,"5 U.S.C. §§ 1501 through 1508,and§§7324 through 7326,and Office of Personnel Management regulations, "Political Activity of State or Local Officers or Employees,"5 C.F.R.Part 151. The"Hatch Act"limits the political activities of state and local agencies and their officers and employees,whose principal employment activities are financed in whole or in part with"Federal Funds"including a loan,grant,or cooperative agreement. Nevertheless,in accordance with 49 U.S.C. § 5307(k)(2)(B)and 23 U.S.C. § 142(g),the"Hatch Act"does not apply to a non-supervisory employee of a transit system(or of any other agency or entity performing related functions)receiving assistance pursuant to the SAFETEA-LU provisions and/or receiving FTA assistance to whom the"Hatch Act"does not otherwise apply. H. False or Fraudulent Statements or Claims. The GRANT RECIPIENT acknowledges and agrees that: 1. The Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986,as amended,31 U.S.C. §§3801 et seq.,and U.S.DOT regulations, "Program Fraud Civil Remedies,"49 C.F.R.Part 31,apply to its activities in connection with the Project. Accordingly,by executing this AGREEMENT,the GRANT RECIPIENT certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of each statement it has made,it makes,or it may make in connection with the Project covered by this AGREEMENT. In addition to other penalties that may apply,the GRANT RECIPIENT also acknowledges that if it makes a false,fictitious,or fraudulent claim,statement, submission,or certification to the Federal Government,the Federal Government reserves the right to impose the penalties of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986,as amended,on the GRANT RECIPIENT to the extent the Federal Government deems appropriate. 2. Criminal Fraud: If the GRANT RECIPIENT makes a false,fictitious,or fraudulent claim,statement,submission, certification,assurance,or representation to the Federal Government or includes a false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or representation in any agreement in connection with this Project authorized under 49 U.S.C.chapter 53 or any other Federal Law, the Federal Government reserves the right to impose on the GRANT RECIPIENT the penalties of 49 U.S.C. §5323(1), 18 U.S.C. § 1001 or other applicable Federal Law to the extent the Federal Government deems appropriate. I.Trafficking in Persons.To the extent applicable,the GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with the requirements of subsection 106(g)of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000(TVPA),as amended,22 U.S.C. § 7104(g),and the provisions of Subsection 3.g of FTA Master Agreement(15)dated October 1,2008,which by this reference is incorporated herein as if fully set out in this AGREEMENT,and any amendments thereto,and accessible at http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/15-Master.pdf, consistent with U.S.OMB guidance,"Trafficking in Persons:Grants and Cooperative Agreements,"2 C.F.R.Part 175. Section 16 Compliance with Laws and Regulations The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to abide by all applicable State and Federal Laws and Regulations including,but not limited to,those concerning employment,equal opportunity employment,nondiscrimination assurances,Project record keeping necessary to evidence compliance with such Federal and State Laws and Regulations,and retention of all such records. The GRANT RECIPIENT will adhere to all of the nondiscrimination provisions in Chapter 49.60 RCW. Section 17 Civil Rights The GRANT RECIPIENT shall comply with all applicable civil rights laws,regulations and directives except to the extent that the Federal Government determines otherwise in writing. These include,but are not limited to,the following: A. Nondiscrimination in Federal Transit Programs. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply,and assures compliance by each third party contractor,lessee or other participant at any tier,with the provisions of 49 U.S.C. §5332,which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race,color,creed,national origin, sex,or age,and prohibits discrimination in employment or business opportunity; B. Nondiscrimination-Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply,and assure compliance by each third party contractor at any tier,with all provisions prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race,color,or national origin, of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,as amended,42 U.S.C. §§2000d et seq.;and U.S.DOT regulations, "Nondiscrimination in Federally-Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation-Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act,"49 C.F.R.Part 21. Except to the extent FTA determines otherwise in writing,the GRANT RECIPIENT also agrees to follow all applicable provisions of FTA Circular 4702.1A,"Title VI and Title VI-Dependent Guidelines for Federal Transit Assistance Recipients,"May 13,2007 and any other applicable implementing Federal Directives that may be issued; C. Equal Employment Opportunity. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply,and assures compliance by each third party contractor,lessee or other participant at any tier of this Project,with all requirements of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Page 6 of 16 as amended,42 U.S.C. §2000e,and 49 U.S.C. § 5332 and any implementing Federal Regulations and any subsequent amendments thereto. Except to the extent FTA determines otherwise in writing,the GRANT RECIPIENT also agrees to comply with any applicable Federal equal employment opportunity(EEO)directives that may be issued. Accordingly: 1. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race,color,creed,sex,disability,age,or national origin. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment,without regard to their race,color,creed,sex, disability,age,or national origin. Such action shall include,but not be limited to,employment,upgrading,demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising,layoff or termination;rates of pay or other forms of compensation;and selection for training,including apprenticeship. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall also comply with any implementing requirements FTA may issue. 2. If the GRANT RECIPIENT is required to submit and obtain Federal Government approval of its EEO program,that EEO program approved by the Federal Government is incorporated by reference and made part of this AGREEMENT. Failure by the GRANT RECIPIENT to carry out the terms of that EEO program shall be treated as a violation of this AGREEMENT. Upon notification to the GRANT RECIPIENT of its failure to carry out the approved EEO program,the Federal Government may impose such remedies,as it considers appropriate,including termination of Federal financial assistance,or other measures that may affect the GRANT RECIPIENT's eligibility to obtain future Federal financial assistance for transportation projects. D. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with all applicable requirements of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,as amended,20 U.S.C. §§ 1681 et seq.and with any implementing Federal regulations that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex that may be applicable. E. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with applicable requirements of: 1. The Age Discrimination Act of 1975,as amended,42 U.S.C. §§6101 et seq.,and with implementing U.S.Health and Human Services,"Nondiscrimination on the basis of Age in Programs and Activities Receiving Federal Assistance,"45 C.F.R. Part 90,which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age. 2. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act(ADEA),29 U.S.C. §§621 through 634,and with implementing U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission(U.S.EEOC)regulations,"Age Discrimination in Employment Act,"29 C.F.R.Part 1625. F. Disabilities-Employment. In accordance with section 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act,as amended,42 U.S.C. § 12112,the GRANT RECIPIENT agrees that it will comply with the requirements of U.S.Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, "Regulations to Implement the Equal Employment Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act,"29 C.F.R. Part 1630,pertaining to employment of persons with disabilities. In addition,the GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with any implementing requirements FTA may issue. G. Disabilities-Access. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. § 5301(d),which state the Federal policy that the elderly and persons with disabilities have the same rights as other persons to use mass transportation service and facilities,and that special efforts shall be made in planning and designing those services and facilities to implement said policy. The GRANT RECIPIENT also agrees to comply with all applicable requirements of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,as amended,29 U.S.C. § 794,which prohibit discrimination on the basis of handicap;with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990(ADA),as amended,42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq.,which requires the provision of accessible facilities and services to be made available to persons with disabilities;and the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968,as amended,42 U.S.C. §§4151 et seq,which requires that buildings and public accommodations be accessible to persons with disabilities;and with other laws and amendments thereto pertaining to access for individuals with disabilities that may be applicable.In addition,the GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with applicable implementing Federal regulations and any later amendments thereto,and agrees to follow applicable Federal directives except to the extent FTA approves otherwise in writing.Among those regulations and directives are the following: U.S.DOT regulations,"Transportation Services for Individuals with Disabilities(ADA),"49 C.F.R. Part 37;U.S.DOT regulations,"Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Receiving or Benefiting from Federal Financial Assistance,"49 C.F.R.Part 27;Joint U.S.Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board U.S.DOT regulations;"Americans with Disabilities(ADA)Accessibility Specifications for Transportation Vehicles,"36 C.F.R. Part 1192 and 49 C.F.R.Part 38;U.S.DOJ regulations,"Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services,"28 C.F.R.Part 35;U.S.DOJ regulations,"Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability by Public Accommodations and in Commercial Facilities,"28 C.F.R.Part 36;U.S.GSA regulations,"Accommodations for the Physically Handicapped,"41 C.F.R. Subpart 101-19;U.S.Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,"Regulations to Implement the Equal Employment Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act,"29 C.F.R.Part 1630;U.S.Federal Communications Commission regulations,"Telecommunications Relay Services and Related Custom Premises Equipment for the Hearing and Speech Disabled,"47 C.F.R.Part 64,Subpart F;U.S.ATBCB regulations,"Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards,"36 C.F.R.Part 1194; FTA regulations,"Transportation for Elderly and Handicapped Persons,"49 C.F.R.Part 609; Page 7 of 16 and Federal civil rights and nondiscrimination directives implementing the foregoing regulations,except to the extent the Federal Government determines otherwise in writing. H. Drug or Alcohol Abuse. Confidentiality and Other Civil Rights Protections. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with the confidentiality and other civil rights provisions of the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972,as amended 21 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq.;with the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention,Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970,as amended;42 U.S.C. §§4541 et seq.;and to comply with the Public Health Service Act of 1912,as amended,42 U.S.C. §§201 et seq. and any subsequent amendments to these laws. I. Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with the policies of Executive Order No. 13166,"Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency,"42 U.S.C. §2000d-1 note,and with provisions of U.S.DOT Notice"DOT Policy Guidance Concerning Recipients Responsibilities to Limited English Proficient(LEP)Persons,"70 Fed.Reg. 74087 December 14,2005. J. Environmental Justice. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with the policies of Executive Order No. 12898, "Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations,"42 U.S.C. §4321 note, except to the extent that the Federal Government determines otherwise in writing. K. Other Nondiscrimination Statutes. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with all applicable provisions of other Federal Laws,Regulations,and Directives pertaining to and prohibiting discrimination and other nondiscrimination statute(s)that may apply to the Project including chapter 49.60 RCW. Section 18 Participation of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises The GRANT RECIPIENT shall take the following measures to facilitate participation by disadvantaged business enterprises (DBE)in the Project: A. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with section 1101(b)of SAFETEA-LU,23 U.S.C. § 101 note,and U.S.DOT regulations,"Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Financial Assistance Programs,"49 C.F.R.Part 26;and B. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees that it shall not discriminate on the basis of race,color,national origin,or sex in the award and performance of any third party contract,or sub-agreement supported with Federal assistance derived from the U.S.DOT or in the administration of its DBE program or the requirements of 49 C.F.R.Part 26. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 C.F.R.Part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of all third party contracts and sub-agreements supported with Federal assistance derived from the U.S.DOT. The GRANT RECIPIENT's DBE program,as required by 49 C.F.R.Part 26 and approved by the U.S.DOT,if any is incorporated by reference and made part of this AGREEMENT. Implementation of the DBE program is a legal obligation,and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as violation of this AGREEMENT.Upon notification to the GRANT RECIPIENT of its failure to implement its approved DBE program,the U.S.DOT may impose sanctions as provided for under 49 C.F.R.Part 26 and may,in appropriate cases,refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. § 1001,and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act,31 U.S.C. §§3801 et seq. Section 19 Energy Conservation and Environmental Requirements A. Energy Conservation. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall comply with the mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency standards and policies within the Washington State energy conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act,42 U.S.C. §§6321 et seq.,and any amendments thereto. B. Environmental Protection. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with all applicable requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969,as amended,42 U.S.C. §§4321 through 4335;Executive Order No. 11514,as amended, "Protection and Enhancement of Environmental Quality,"42 U.S.C. §4321 note;FTA statutory requirements at 49 U.S.C. §5324(b);U.S.Council on Environmental Quality regulations imposing requirements for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969,as amended,40 C.F.R.Part 1500 through 1508;joint Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)/FTA regulations,"Environmental Impact and Related Procedures,"23 C.F.R.Part 771 and 49 C.F.R.Part 622,and subsequent Federal environmental protection regulations that may be promulgated.The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with 23 U.S.C. §§ 139 and 326 as applicable and implement those requirements in accordance with the provisions of joint FHWA/FTA fmal guidance"SAFETEA-LU Environmental Review Process(Public Law 109-59),"71 Fed.Reg. 66576 et seq., November 15,2006 and any applicable Federal Directives that may be issued at a later date,except to the extent that FTA determines otherwise in writing. C. Clean Water. In the event that the"Federal Funds,"identified in"PROJECT COST"of this AGREEMENT,exceeds $100,000,the GRANT RECIPIENT shall comply with all applicable standards,orders,or regulations issued pursuant to Section Page 8 of 16 508 of the Clean Water Act,as amended,33 U.S.C. § 1368,and other applicable requirements of the Clean Water Act, as amended 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 through 1377. 1.The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to refrain from using any violating facilities. 2. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to report each violation to STA and understands and agrees that STA will,in turn, report each violation,as required,to the FTA and to the appropriate EPA Regional Office. 3. The GRANT RECIPIENT also agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract that exceeds$100,000 and is financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA. D. Clean Air. In the event that the"Federal Funds,"identified in"PROJECT COST"exceeds$100,000,the GRANT RECIPIENT shall comply with all applicable standards,orders or regulations issued pursuant to Section 306 of the Clean Air Act, as amended,42 U.S.C. §7414,and other applicable provisions of the Clean Air Act,as amended,42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 through 7671q,including: 1. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall refrain from using any violating facilities. 2. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to report each violation to STA and understands and agrees that STA will,in turn, report each violation to the FTA and to the appropriate EPA Regional Office. 3. The GRANT RECIPIENT also agrees to include these requirements in each contract exceeding$100,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by the FTA. Section 20 Accounting Records A. Project Accounts. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to establish and maintain for the Project either a separate set of accounts or separate accounts within the framework of an established accounting system that can be identified with the Project,in accordance with applicable Federal Regulations and other requirements that FTA may impose. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees that all checks,payrolls,invoices,contracts,vouchers,orders,or other accounting documents pertaining in whole or in part to the Project shall be clearly identified,readily accessible and available to STA and FTA upon request,and,to the extent feasible,kept separate from documents not pertaining to the Project. B. Funds Received or Made Available for the Project. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to deposit in a financial institution, all advance Project payments it receives from the Federal Government and record in the Project Account all amounts provided by the Federal Government in support of this Grant AGREEMENT or Cooperative AGREEMENT and all other funds provided for, accruing to,or otherwise received on account of the Project(Project funds)in accordance with applicable Federal Regulations and other requirements FTA may impose. Use of financial institutions owned at least 50 percent by minority group members is encouraged. C. Documentation of Project Costs and Program Income. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to support all costs charged to the Project,including any approved services contributed by the GRANT RECIPIENT or others,with properly executed payrolls, time records,invoices,contracts,or vouchers describing in detail the nature and propriety of the charges. The GRANT RECIPIENT also agrees to maintain accurate records of all program income derived from implementing the Project,except certain income determined by FTA to be exempt from Federal program income requirements. D. Checks,Orders,and Vouchers. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to refrain from drawing checks,drafts,or orders for goods or services to be charged against the Project Account until it has received and filed a properly signed voucher describing in proper detail the purpose for the expenditure. Section 21 Audits,Inspection,and Retention of Records A. Submission of Proceedings,Agreements,and Other Documents. During the course of the Project and for six(6)years thereafter,the GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to retain intact and to provide any data,documents,reports,records,contracts,and supporting materials relating to the Project as STA may require. Reporting and record-keeping requirements are set forth in 49 C.F.R.Part 19 or 49 C.F.R.Part 18 as applicable. Project closeout does not alter these recording and record-keeping requirements. Should an audit,enforcement,or litigation process be commenced,but not completed,during the aforementioned six-year period then the GRANT RECIPIENT's obligations hereunder shall be extended until the conclusion of that pending audit, enforcement,or litigation process. B. General Audit Requirements. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to perform the financial and compliance audits required by the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996,31 U.S.C. §§7501 et seq. As provided by 49 C.F.R.Part 19.26,these financial and compliance audits must comply with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133,Revised,"Audits of States,Local Governments,and Non-Profit Organizations,"the latest OMB A-133 Compliance Supplement for U.S.DOT,and any further revision or supplement Page 9 of 16 thereto. The GRANT RECIPIENT also agrees to obtain any other audits required by the Federal Government. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees that audits will be carried out in accordance with U.S.General Accounting Office"Government Auditing Standards." The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to obtain any other audits required by STA. Project closeout will not alter the GRANT RECIPIENT's audit responsibilities. C. Inspection. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to permit STA,the United States Department of Transportation,and the Comptroller General of the United States,or their authorized representatives,to inspect all Project work materials,payrolls, maintenance records,and other data,and to audit the books,records,and accounts of the GRANT RECIPIENT and its contractors pertaining to the Project. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to require each third party contractor whose contract award is not based on competitive bidding procedures as defined by the United States Department of Transportation to permit STA,the United States Department of Transportation,and the Comptroller General of the United States,or their duly authorized representatives,to inspect all work,materials,payrolls,and other data and records involving that third party contract,and to audit the books,records, and accounts involving that third party contract as it affects the Project as required by 49 U.S.C. §5325(g). Section 22 Labor Provisions A. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall comply with,and shall require the compliance by each subcontractor at any tier,any applicable employee protection requirements for non-construction employees as defined by the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act,as amended,40 U.S.C. §§3701 et seq., and specifically,the wage and hour requirements of Section 102 of that Act at 40 U.S.C. §3702 and U.S.DOL regulations,"Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction(also Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Non-construction Contracts Subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act)"at 29 C.F.R.Part 5;and the safety requirements of Section 107 of that Act at 40 U.S.C. §3704,and implementing U.S.DOL regulations,"Safety and Health Regulations for Construction,"29 C.F.R.Part 1926. B. Fair Labor Standards Act. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees that the minimum wage and overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act,as amended,29 U.S.C. §§201 et seq.,apply to employees performing work involving commerce,and apply to any local government employees that are public transit authority employees. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall comply with the Fair Labor Standards Act's minimum wage and overtime requirements for employees performing work in connection with the Project. C. Overtime Requirements. No contractor or subcontractor contracting for any part of the contract work which may require or involve the employment of laborers or mechanics shall require or permit any such laborer or mechanic in any workweek in which he or she is employed on such work to work in excess of forty(40)hours in such workweek unless such laborer or mechanic receives compensation at a rate not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty (40)hours in such workweek. D. Payrolls and Basic Records. Payrolls and basic records relating thereto shall be maintained by the GRANT RECIPIENT during the course of the work and preserved for a period of six(6)years thereafter for all laborers and mechanics working at the site of the work(or under the United States Housing Act of 1937,or under the Housing Act of 1949,in the construction or development of the Project). Such records shall contain the name,address,and social security number of each such worker,his or her correct classification,hourly rates of wages paid(including rates of contributions or costs anticipated for bona fide fringe benefits or cash equivalents thereof of the types described in section 1(b)(2)(B)of the Davis-Bacon Act,Public-Law 88-349,as amended by 40 U.S.C. §§3141 et seq.,and pursuant to 49 U.S.C. §§ 5333(a)et seq.,daily and weekly number of hours worked, deductions made and actual wages paid. Whenever the Secretary of Labor has found under 29 C.F.R. 5.5(a)(1)(iv)that the wages of any laborer or mechanic include the amount of any costs reasonably anticipated in providing benefits under a plan or program described in section 1(b)(2)(B)of the Davis-Bacon Act,Public Law 88-349,as amended by 40 U.S.C. §3141 et seq.and pursuant to 49 U.S.C. §5333(a),the GRANT RECIPIENT shall maintain records which show that the commitment to provide such benefits is enforceable,that the plan or program is financially responsible,and that the plan or program has been communicated in writing to the laborers or mechanics affected,and records which show the costs anticipated or the actual cost incurred in providing such benefits. GRANT RECIPIENT's employing apprentices or trainees under approved programs shall maintain written evidence of the registration of apprenticeship programs and certification of trainee programs,the registration of the apprentices and trainees, and the ratios and wage rates prescribed in the applicable programs. E. Violation; liability for unpaid wages;liquidated damages. In the event of any violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (A)of this section the GRANT RECIPIENT and any subcontractor responsible therefore shall be liable for the unpaid wages. In addition,such GRANT RECIPIENT and subcontractor shall be liable to the United States for liquidated damages. Such liquidated damages shall be computed with respect to each individual laborer or mechanic,including watchmen and guards,employed in violation of the clause set forth in paragraph(A)of this section,in the sum of ten dollars($10)for each calendar day on which such individual was required or permitted to work in excess of the standard workweek of forty(40)hours without payment of the overtime wages required by the clause set forth in paragraph(C)of this section. Page 10 of 16 F. Withholding for unpaid wages and liquidated damages. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall,upon its own action or upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor,withhold or cause to be withheld,from any moneys payable on account of work performed by the GRANT RECIPIENT or subcontractor under any such contract or any other Federal contract with the same prime GRANT RECIPIENT,or any other federally-assisted contract subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act,which is held by the same prime GRANT RECIPIENT,such sums as may be determined to be necessary to satisfy any liabilities of such GRANT RECIPIENT or subcontractor for unpaid wages and liquidated damages as provided in the clause set forth in paragraph(E)of this section. G. Public Transportation Employee Protective Agreement. To the extent required by Federal Law,the GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to implement the Project in accordance with the terms and conditions that the U.S. Secretary of Labor has determined to be fair and equitable to protect the interests of any employees affected by the Project and that comply with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. §5333(b),in accordance with the U. S.DOL guidelines,"Section 5333(b),Federal Transit Law,"29 C.F.R.Part 215 and any amendments thereto. These terms and conditions are identified in U.S.DOL's certification of public transportation employee protective arrangements to FTA. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to implement the Project in accordance with the conditions stated in that U.S.DOL certification,which certification and any documents cited therein are incorporated by reference and made part of this AGREEMENT. The GRANT RECIPIENT also agrees to comply with the terms and conditions of the Special Warranty for the Non-urbanized Area Program that is most current as of the date of execution of this AGREEMENT and any alternative comparable arrangements specified by U.S.DOL for application to the Project,in accordance with U.S.DOL guidelines,"Section 5333(b),Federal Transit Law,"29 C.F.R.Part 215,and any revision thereto. Section 23 Planning and Private Enterprise FTA Requirements. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to implement the Project in a manner consistent with the plans developed in compliance with the applicable planning and private enterprise provisions of 49 U.S.C. §§5303,5304,5306,and 5323(a)(1);joint Federal Highway Administration(FHWA)/FTA regulations,"Statewide Transportation Planning:Metropolitan Transportation Planning,"23 C.F.R.Part 450 and 49 C.F.R.Part 613;and any amendments thereto and with FTA regulations, "Major Capital Investment Projects,"49 C.F.R.Part 611,to the extent that these regulations are consistent with the SAFETEA-LU amendments to the public transportation planning and private enterprise laws,and when promulgated,any subsequent amendments to those regulations. To the extent feasible,the GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with the provisions of 49 U.S.C. §5323(k),which afford governmental agencies and non-profit organizations that receive Federal assistance for non-emergency transportation from Federal Governmental sources(other than U.S.DOT)an opportunity to be included in the design, coordination,and planning of transportation services.During the implementation of the Project,the GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to take into considerations the recommendations of Executive Order No. 12803,"Infrastructure Privatization,"31 U.S.C. § 501 note,and Executive Order No 12893,"Principles for Federal Infrastructure Investments,"31 U.S.C. §501 note. Section 24 Substance Abuse A. Drug and Alcohol Abuse. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to establish and implement a drug and alcohol testing program that complies with 49 C.F.R. Part 655,produce any documentation necessary to establish its compliance with Part 655,and permit any authorized representative of the United States Department of Transportation or its operating administrations and STA to inspect the facilities and records associated with the implementation of the drug and alcohol testing program as required under 49 C.F.R. Part 655 and review the testing process. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees further to submit annually the Management Information System(MIS)reports to STA by February 28th each year for the useful life of the Project Equipment. B. Privacy Act. The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to comply with the confidentiality and other civil rights provisions of the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972, Pub. L. 92-255, March 21, 1972, as amended 21 U.S.C. §§1101 et seq., the Comprehensive Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment, and Rehabilitation Act of 1970, Pub. L. 91-616, December 31, 1970,as amended 42 U.S.C. §§4541 et seq., and the Public Health Services Act of 1912,as amended 42 U.S.C. §§201 et seq., 42 U.S.C. §§ 290dd-2, 290dd-3 and 290ee-3 including amendments to these acts. The GRANT RECIPIENT understands the requirements of confidentiality concerning persons covered and/or receiving services and/or treatment regarding alcohol and drug abuse, as defined in the aforementioned acts as applicable, including any civil and criminal penalties for not complying with the requirements of confidentiality and that failure to comply with such requirements may result in termination of this AGREEMENT. Section 25 Coordination of Special Needs Transportation It is the policy of the STA to actively support coordination of special needs transportation in the state. As a condition of assistance,the GRANT RECIPIENT is required to participate in local coordinated planning as led by GRANT RECIPIENT's relevant Metropolitan Planning Organization(MPO)and/or Regional Transportation Planning Organization(RTPO). Page 11 of 16 Section 26 State and Local Law Except when a Federal Statute or Regulation pre-empts State and Local Law,no provision of this AGREEMENT shall require the GRANT RECIPIENT to observe or enforce compliance with any provision,perform any other act,or do any other thing in contravention of State or Local Law. Thus if any provision or compliance with any provision of this AGREEMENT violate State, or Local Law,or would require the GRANT RECIPIENT to violate State or Local Law,the GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to notify STA immediately in writing. Should this occur,STA and the GRANT RECIPIENT agree to make appropriate arrangements to proceed with or,if necessary,expeditiously terminate the Project. Section 27 Limitation of Liability A. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall indemnify and hold harmless STA,its agents,employees,and officers from and process and defend at its own expense any and all claims,demands,suits at law or equity,actions,penalties,losses,damages,or costs (hereinafter referred to collectively as"claims"),of whatsoever kind or nature brought against STA arising out of,in connection with or incident to the execution of this AGREEMENT and/or the GRANT RECIPIENT's performance or failure to perform any aspect of this AGREEMENT. This indemnity provision applies to all claims against STA,its agents,employees and officers arising out of,in connection with or incident to the negligent acts or omissions of the GRANT RECIPIENT,its agents,employees and officers.Provided,however,that nothing herein shall require the GRANT RECIPIENT to indemnify and hold harmless or defend STA,its agents,employees or officers to the extent that claims are caused by the negligent acts or omissions of STA,its agents,employees or officers. The indemnification and hold harmless provision shall survive termination of this AGREEMENT. B. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall be deemed an independent GRANT RECIPIENT for all purposes,and the employees of the GRANT RECIPIENT,or its subcontractors and the employees thereof,shall not in any manner be deemed to be the employees of STA. C. The GRANT RECIPIENT specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by GRANT RECIPIENT's employees and/or subcontractors and solely for the purposes of this indemnification and defense,the GRANT RECIPIENT specifically waives any immunity under the State Industrial Insurance Law,Title 51 Revised Code of Washington. D. In the event either the GRANT RECIPIENT or STA incurs attorney's fees,costs or other legal expenses to enforce the provisions of this section of the AGREEMENT against the other PARTY,all such fees,costs and expenses shall be recoverable by the prevailing PARTY. Section 28 Changed Conditions Affecting Performance The GRANT RECIPIENT hereby agrees to immediately notify STA in writing of any change in conditions or law,or of any other event,which may affect its ability to perform the Project in accordance with the provisions of this AGREEMENT. Section 29 Agreement Modifications Either PARTY may request changes to this AGREEMENT. Any changes to the terms of this AGREEMENT must be mutually agreed upon and incorporated by written amendment to this AGREEMENT. Such amendments or modifications to the terms of this AGREEMENT shall not be binding or valid unless signed by the authorized representatives of both PARTIES. Section 30 Termination A. Termination for Convenience. STA and/or the GRANT RECIPIENT may suspend or terminate this AGREEMENT,in whole or in part,by written notice to the other PARTY in accordance with 49 C.F.R.Part 18.44. STA and the GRANT RECIPIENT shall agree upon the AGREEMENT termination provisions including but not limited to the settlement terms, conditions,and in the case of partial termination the portion to be terminated. Written notification must set forth the reasons for such termination,the effective date,and in case of a partial termination,the portion to be terminated. The PARTIES may terminate this AGREEMENT for convenience for reasons including,but not limited to,the following: 1. The requisite"Federal Funds"become unavailable through failure of appropriation or otherwise; 2. STA determines,in its sole discretion,that the continuation of the Project would not produce beneficial results commensurate with the further expenditure of funds; 3. The GRANT RECIPIENT is prevented from proceeding with the Project as a direct result of an Executive Order of the President with respect to the prosecution of war or in the interest of national defense;or an Executive Order of the President or Governor of the State with respect to the preservation of energy resources; Page 12 of 16 4. The GRANT RECIPIENT is prevented from proceeding with the Project by reason of a temporary preliminary,special,or permanent restraining order or injunction of a court of competent jurisdiction where the issuance of such order or injunction is primarily caused by the acts or omissions of persons or agencies other than the GRANT RECIPIENT; 5. The Federal Government determines that the purposes of the statute authorizing the Project would not be adequately served by the continuation of Federal financial assistance for the Project;or 6. The Federal Government terminates this AGREEMENT due to a determination that the GRANT RECIPIENT has:(a) willfully misused Federal assistance funds by failing to make adequate progress on the Project,(b)failed to make reasonable and appropriate use of the Project real property,facilities,or equipment,or(c)failed to comply with the terms of this AGREEMENT. In the event of a termination under this subsection,and the Federal Government exercises its right to require STA to refund any or all of the"Federal Funds"provided for the Project,the GRANT RECIPIENT shall return all monies reimbursed to it by STA,in the amount required by the Federal Government,within sixty(60)days of its receipt of a certified letter from STA. 7. In the case of termination for convenience under subsections A.1-5 above,STA shall reimburse the GRANT RECIPIENT for all costs payable under this AGREEMENT which the GRANT RECIPIENT properly incurred prior to termination. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall promptly submit its claim for reimbursement to STA. If the GRANT RECIPIENT has any property in its possession belonging to STA,the GRANT RECIPIENT will account for the same,and dispose of it in the manner STA directs. B. Termination for Default. STA may suspend or terminate this AGREEMENT for default,in whole or in part,and all or any part of the Federal financial assistance provided herein,at any time by written notice to the GRANT RECIPIENT,if the GRANT RECIPIENT materially breaches or fails to perform any of the requirements of this AGREEMENT,including: 1. Takes any action pertaining to this AGREEMENT without the approval of STA,which under the procedures of this AGREEMENT would have required the approval of STA; 2. Jeopardizes its ability to perform pursuant to this AGREEMENT,United States of America Laws,Washington State Laws,or local governmental laws under which the GRANT RECIPIENT operates; 3. Abuses or misuses the Project Equipment,including,but not limited to: a. Failure to maintain a vehicle according to the manufacturer's standards; b. Failure to repair damages or replace defective or broken parts in a timely manner;or c. Failure to take any action which could affect the ability of the Project Equipment to perform its designated function or takes any action which could shorten its useful life for Project use or otherwise. d. Failure to make reasonable and appropriate use of the Project Equipment,real property,or facilities. 4. Fails to make reasonable progress on the Project or other violation of this AGREEMENT that endangers substantial performance of the Project;or 5. Fails to perform in the manner called for in this AGREEMENT,or fails,to comply with,or is in violation of any provision of this AGREEMENT. STA shall serve a notice of termination on the GRANT RECIPIENT setting forth the manner in which the GRANT RECIPIENT is in default hereunder. If it is later determined by STA that the GRANT RECIPIENT had an excusable reason for not performing,such as events which are not the fault of or are beyond the control of the GRANT RECIPIENT,such as a strike,fire or flood,STA may: (a)allow the GRANT RECIPIENT to continue work after setting up a new delivery of performance schedule,or(b)treat the termination as a termination for convenience. C. STA,in its sole discretion may,in the case of a termination for breach or default,allow the GRANT RECIPIENT ten(10) business days,or such longer period as determined by STA,in which to cure the defect. In such case,the notice of termination will state the time period in which cure is permitted and other appropriate conditions. If the GRANT RECIPIENT fails to remedy to STA's satisfaction the breach or default within the timeframe and under the conditions set forth in the notice of termination, STA shall have the right to terminate this AGREEMENT without any further obligation to GRANT RECIPIENT. Any such termination for default shall not in any way operate to preclude STA from also pursuing all available remedies against GRANT RECIPIENT and its sureties for said breach or default including,but not limited to,demanding the return of some or all of the funds paid under this AGREEMENT. D. In the event that STA elects to waive its remedies for any breach by GRANT RECIPIENT of any covenant,term or condition of this AGREEMENT,such waiver by STA shall not limit STA's remedies for any succeeding breach of that or of any other term, covenant,or condition of this AGREEMENT. Page 13 of 16 Section 31 Lack of Waiver In no event shall any STA payment of grant funds to the GRANT RECIPIENT constitute or be construed as a waiver by STA of any GRANT RECIPIENT breach,or default. Such payment shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to STA with respect to any breach or default. Section 32 STA Advice The GRANT RECIPIENT bears complete responsibility for the administration and success of the Project as it is defined by this AGREEMENT and any amendments thereto. If the GRANT RECIPIENT solicits advice from STA on problems that may arise,the offering of STA advice shall not shift the responsibility of the GRANT RECIPIENT for the correct administration and success of the Project,and STA shall not be held liable for offering advice to the GRANT RECIPIENT. Section 33 Subrogation A. Prior to Subrogation. STA may require the GRANT RECIPIENT to take such action as may be necessary or appropriate to preserve the GRANT RECIPIENT's right to recover damages from any person or organization alleged to be legally responsible for injury to the Project Equipment or other property in which STA has a financial interest. B. Subrogation. STA may require the GRANT RECIPIENT to assign to it all right of recovery against any person or organization for loss,to the extent of STA's loss. Upon assignment,the GRANT RECIPIENT shall execute,deliver,and do whatever else necessary to secure STA's rights. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall do nothing after any loss to prejudice the rights of STA. C. Duties of the GRANT RECIPIENT. If STA has exercised its right of subrogation,the GRANT RECIPIENT shall cooperate with STA and,upon STA's request,assist in the prosecution of suits and enforce any right against any person or organization who may be liable to STA due to damage of Project Equipment. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall attend hearings and trials,assist in securing and giving evidence,and obtain the attendance of witnesses. Section 34 Forbearance by STA Not a Waiver Any forbearance by STA in exercising any right or remedy hereunder, or otherwise afforded by applicable law, shall not be a waiver of or preclude the exercise of any such right or remedy. Section 35 Disputes A. Disputes. Disputes,arising in the performance of this AGREEMENT,which are not resolved by agreement of the PARTIES, shall be decided in writing by a third party mediator,whose selection will be mutually agreed upon by the PARTIES.This decision shall be final and conclusive and binding upon the PARTIES,and the PARTIES shall abide by the decision. B. Performance During Dispute. Unless otherwise directed by STA,GRANT RECIPIENT shall continue performance under this AGREEMENT while matters in dispute are being resolved. C. Claims for Damages. Should either PARTY to this AGREEMENT suffer injury or damage to person,property,or right because of any act or omission of the other PARTY or any of that PARTY's employees,agents or others for whose acts it is legally liable,a claim for damages therefore shall be made in writing to such other PARTY within thirty(30)days after the first observance of such injury or damage. D. Rights and Remedies. All remedies provided in this AGREEMENT are distinct and cumulative to any other right or remedy under this document or afforded by law or equity,and may be exercised independently,concurrently,or successively and shall not be construed to be a limitation of any duties,obligations,rights and remedies of the PARTIES hereto. No action or failure to act by STA or GRANT RECIPIENT shall constitute a waiver of any right or duty afforded any of them under this AGREEMENT,nor shall any such action or failure to act constitute an approval of or acquiescence in any breach thereunder,except as may be specifically agreed in writing. Section 36 Venue and Process In the event that either PARTY deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or obligation under this AGREEMENT,the PARTIES hereto agree that any such action shall be initiated in the Superior Court of the State of Washington situated in Spokane County. The PARTIES hereby accept the issuing and service of process by registered mail at the mailing address shown in the caption space heading of this AGREEMENT titled"GRANT RECIPIENT"and"Spokane Transit Authority." The PARTIES agree that the laws of the State of Washington shall apply. Page 14 of 16 Section 37 Counterparts This AGREEMENT may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts,each of which shall be deemed to be an original having identical legal effect. The GRANT RECIPIENT does hereby ratify and adopt all statements,representations,warranties, covenants,and agreements and their supporting materials contained and/or mentioned herein,and does hereby accept FTA's grant and agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof. Section 38 Severability Should any section,term or provision of this AGREEMENT be adjudged as void,such adjudication shall not affect the validity or obligation of performance of any other covenant or provision,or any part thereof,which by itself is valid if such remainder conforms to the terms and requirements of applicable law and the intent of this AGREEMENT.No controversy concerning any covenant or provision shall delay the performance of any other covenant or provision except as herein allowed. Section 39 Complete Agreement This document contains all covenants,stipulations,and provisions agreed upon by STA. No agent or representative of STA has authority to make,and STA shall not be bound by or be liable for,any statement,representation,promise or agreement not set forth herein or made by written amendment hereto. Section 40 Section Headings All section headings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this AGREEMENT. Section 41 Execution This AGREEMENT is executed by the Chief Executive Officer of Spokane Transit Authority or the Chief Executive Officer's designee,not as an individual incurring personal obligation and liability,but solely by,for and on behalf of the Spokane Transit Authority,in the capacity as Chief Executive Officer or as a designee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the PARTIES hereto have executed this AGREEMENT the day and year last written below. SPOKANE TRANSIT AUTHORITY CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY By: By: E. Susan Meyer Authorized Representative Chief Executive Officer Print Name Print Title Who by this signature certifies their authority to execute this AGREEMENT on behalf of the GRANT RECIPIENT. Date: Date: Approved as to form only: By: Laura McAloon Legal Counsel Date: February ,2012 Page 15 of 16 Exhibit I SCOPE OF PROJECT AND BUDGET Total Project Budget Federal Funds $ 178,790 State Funds $ 0 Contractor Funds $ 44,698 Total Cost $ 223,488 Scope of Work: The proposed project will complete gaps in sidewalks serving transit routes and construct concrete pads, curb ramps and related improvements at transit stops that currently have accessibility barriers to disabled residents. A list of projects was developed to establish the scope and nature of projects to be completed with New Freedom Funding. Project segments were identified in coordination with STA based upon known accessibility hazards and barriers, feedback from disabled residents, and volume of transit ridership. City staff will coordinate with STA to complete as many of the following identified projects and projects of similar scope and nature as funding will allow. Small portions of right-of- way acquisition may be necessary to complete some of the projects segments. Sidewalk Segments: 1. Montgomery Ave. (University Rd. to Wilbur Rd.): Completes gaps on north side of street, portion of gaps on south side. 2. 4th Ave. (University Rd. to Pierce Rd.): Completes gap on north side of street. Project connects Valley Transit Center and several large apartment complexes adjacent to 4th Ave. and Pierce Rd. 3. Tshirley Rd. (Sprague Ave. to Coach Drive): Completes gaps on east side of street. Project connects senior living facility and adjacent residential neighborhood to transit stops on Sprague Ave. 4. Park Rd. (8th Ave. to 12th Ave.): Completes gap in sidewalk on west side of street. Project connects large proposed new residential development(Taylor Cottages) to existing sidewalk, Edgecliff Park and transit stops. Transit Stop Improvements: Bus Pads, Curb Ramps, sites for Future Bus Shelters, and related improvements: 1. Sprague @ Pines Rd.: Northwest corner and Southeast corner 2. Sprague @ University Rd.: Northwest corner 3. Sprague @ Sullivan Rd.: Northwest corner 4. Sprague @ Havana Rd.: Northeast corner 5. Mission Rd. @ Mullen Rd.: Approx. 150-ft East of Intersection 6. Mission Rd. East of Barker Rd.: Add ramps/pads to accommodate new Route#98 7. Sullivan @ Spokane Industrial Park: Add pads adjacent to Kiernan/Euclid intersections 8. Indiana @ Evergreen: Southeast corner 9. Indiana @ ITT: South side of street 10. Indiana @ Staples: Southwest corner of intersection 11. Indiana @ Krispy Kreme: North side of street 12. Sullivan(4th to 16th) Provide pads on west side of street at intersections Page 16 of 16 8 s 8 PACIFIC OCEAN SIDEWALK AND TRANSIT STOP ACCESSIBILITY PROJECT CANADA ..."1111 litegroi Anna "IP OREGON SPOKANE COUNTY SPOKANE COUNTY r'� mk01 SPOKANE COM NITY N/I °in COLLEGE z � z BROADW ®W�� A ��i ■■I aINTERSTATE � i FAIR GROUND 0I 9 DEER PARK MILLWOOD CLTY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE CHENEY SPOKANE RIVER 3RD Q z VICINITY MAP CC z 0 I U I 0 A- ILA co AlCT ILL 0 WELLESLEY L TRENT IND NA EUCLID 0 Z Q >BROADWAY 0 VALLEY JAY N 8TH C1 16TH C0 CC w 6TH 4TH 8TH 12TH 16TH BROADWAY VALLEYV/AY ISPRAGLE 0 N 24TH 0 24TH a LV a SJ FT 44TH 32ND �r L $B7 0 THORPE 0 LLA CC CC 0 L EUCLID MISSION L 32ND SE Y 90 LIBERTY LAKE NOTE:WE ARE CURRENTLY PROCEEDING WITH THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE AREAS HIGHLIGHTED ON THE MAP ABOVE IN GREEN. INITIAL SIDEWALK EXTENSIONS INCLUDE PARK BETWEEN 8TH AND 12TH ALONG WITH THE NORTH SIDE OF MONTGOMERY FROM UNIVERSITY TO VAN MARTER. f�9 11 0:41 MONTGOMERY FROM UNIVERSITY TO WILBUR-SIDEWALK EXTENSION 4TH FROM UNIVERSITY TO PIERCE-SIDEWALK EXTENSION TSHIRLEY FROM SPRAGUE TO COACH-SIDEWALK EXTENSION MANSFIELD FROM PINES TO SHANNON-SIDEWALK EXTENSION PARK FROM 8TH TO 12TH-SIDEWALK EXTENSION SPRAGUE AND PINES-BUS SHELTER PADS SPRAGUE AND UNIVERSITY-BUS SHELTER PAD SPRAGUE AND ARGONNE/MULLAN-BUS SHELTER PAD SPRAGUE AND SULLIVAN-BUS SHELTER PAD SPRAGUE AND FARR-BUS SHELTER PAD SPRAGUE AND HAVANA-BUS SHELTER PAD APPLEWAY AND FARR-BUS SHELTER PAD MISSION AND MULLAN-BUS SHELTER FAD MISSION AND BARKER-BUS SHELTER PADS SULLIVAN AT SPOKANE INDUSTRIAL PARK-BUS SHELTER PADS INDIANA AND EVERGREEN-BUS SHELTER PADS INDIANA AT ITT-BUS SHELTER PAD INDIANA AT STAPLES-BUS SHELTER PAD INDIANA NEAR KRISPY KREME-BUS SHELTER PAD SULLIVAN FROM 4TH TO 16TH-BUS SHELTER PADS XINDICATES LOCATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN MOVED TO ANOTHER PROJECT OR ARE NO LONGER FEASIBLE. .Veil1ey City of Spokane Volley Department of Public Works 11707 East Sprague, Ave. Suite 107 SPOKANE VALLEY, WA. 99206 (508) 921-1000 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 20, 2012 Department Director Approval: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2012 Safe Routes to School - Call for Projects GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: June 28, 2011; Adoption of the 2012-2017 Six Year TIP. October 25, 2011; Adoption of Bike & Pedestrian Master Plan, Info RCA on March 13, 2012 Council Packet. BACKGROUND: On January 24th, 2012, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) issued a 2012 Call for Projects for the Safe Routes to School Program (SRTS). The goals of the SRTS program are to address pedestrian and bicycle mobility and safety near elementary and middle schools. The program is funded with a combination of state and federal funds, and applications are due Monday, May 4th, 2012. The SRTS program promotes a comprehensive three part approach of engineering, education & encouragement and enforcement efforts to improve success. Engineering improvements such as sidewalks and crosswalk enhancements that provide safe travel routes are combined with education efforts conducted by the school districts that promote the benefits of walking and biking. Enforcement efforts by local law enforcement agencies are conducted to reinforce safe driver & pedestrian behavior and promote awareness of pedestrians near schools. Staff has been evaluating the SRTS grant criteria and coordinating with local school districts to identify projects that will have the highest benefits and potential to receive funding. We have also reviewed the City's Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan and School Walk Routes map to identify potential projects. Based on this review, staff has come up with the following preliminary list of recommended projects for submitting to WSDOT for the 2012 SRTS Call for Projects. 1. Bowdish Rd. — 8th Ave. to 12th Ave: This project serves students attending Opportunity Elementary School (Central Valley School District). The busy arterial has very narrow gravel shoulders that do not safely accommodate pedestrians. The project would construct sidewalk on both sides of Bowdish Rd. Future phases would construct sidewalk along Bowdish Road from 16th Ave. to 20th Ave. and from 12th Ave. to 16th Ave. that would expand the safe walking routes and serve students attending Bowdish Middle School. 2. Park Rd — Sinto Ave to Indiana Ave: This project serves students attending Seth Woodard Elementary School (West Valley School District). The District currently busses students that live northeast of the school campus and across Park Road because there are no safe walking routes along Park Road or Mission Ave. The proposed project would construct sidewalk along the east side of Park Road and complete a short sidewalk gap along Mission Ave east of Park Road. The Park Road sidewalk would be constructed in the location proposed by the Park Road (Broadway to Indiana) Improvement Project that has already been designed and is waiting for construction funding. The project would allow the District to remove bus stops from this area. 3. Adams Rd —Trent Ave. to Wellesley Ave.: This project serves students attending Trentwood Elementary School (East Valley School District). Sidewalk would be constructed along one side of Adams Road to address the narrow ro. ay and avel shoulders. This segment was part of a previously sub SRT •• ••j= Wellesley Ave (Sullivan Rd. to Isenhart Rd.) in 2010. Tha j ) A funding cutoff. WSDOT Local Programs Office recently n • ( slature is considering whether to fund additional projects f 0- 6 S- project list during the current legislative session. Therefore, this project may be funded without having to be resubmitted. 4. Park Rd — Marietta Ave to Buckeye Ave: This project serves students attending Orchard Center Elementary (West Valley School District). Sidewalk would be constructed from the school on Buckeye Ave to Park Road and along one side of Park Road to Marietta Ave. to address the narrow roadway and shoulders. The project connects to St. Paschal's School where there is a before and after school care program. Students currently are transported the 1-1/2 blocks by van or bus due to the absence of a safe walking route. In addition to the preceding list, there are several worthwhile projects that were also considered for the SRTS program that expand on the recommended projects. 1. Mission Ave — Center Rd to Vista Rd: This project would construct sidewalk along the north side of Mission Ave. It expands the safe walking routes within the neighborhood east of Seth Woodard Elementary School and further reduces the need for bussing students. 2. Vista Rd — Augusta Ave to Knox Ave.: This project is a continuation of the Park Road (Mission Ave to Indiana Ave) and Mission Ave sidewalk projects. It expands the safe walking route to better serve the area east of Vista Road for students attending Seth Woodard Elementary School. 3. Bowdish Rd — 16th Ave. to 20th Ave. and 12th Ave. to 16th Ave: These two projects would expand walking routes for students attending Bowdish Middle School and Opportunity Elementary School. This section of roadway is very narrow with gravel shoulders and numerous fixed obstructions. Sidewalks would also improve the visibility of pedestrians along Bowdish Rd where the site distance is limited from the crest of the hill adjacent to the middle school. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There is no required local match on SRTS funded projects. However during the ranking of projects, preference will be given to projects where the local agency is providing matching funds. As the proposed SRTS applications are developed, staff will coordinate with the Finance Department to ensure there are sufficient city funds to provide potential match for the proposed SRTS projects. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, PE — Senior Capital Projects Engineer Neil Kersten, AIA— Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Vicinity Maps of Recommended Projects BEGIN PROJECT PROPOSED SIDEWALK l r pig L 1.- VA' END PROJECT RTUN>E Y E1SEMENTA V I SCHOOL( 2 #_ SPOKANE RIVER TRENT_ SPOKANE COMIA6NITY P, COLLEGE a BROADWA INTERSTATE it FAIR GROUN SSION BROAD AY SPR G ARP :. _.. BRO DWWP\Y�� VALL YWPY RAGUE L 16TH H< E 29TH rt 32ND J THORPE PROJECT VICINITY Spokane jValley SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROPOSED PROJECT BOWDISH 8TH AVE.TO 12TH AVE. DRAWN BY: DATE: MJH 3/14/12 CHECKED BY: DATE: SMW 3/14/12 END PROJECT -\ ST PASCHAL'S SCHOOL %a BEGIN PROJECT PROJECT VICINITY SPOKANE COMM6NITY w COLLEGE SPOKANE RIVER 90 MISSION AY a APPLE WAY L z U Spokane jValley SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROPOSED PROJECT PARK ROAD MARIETTA TO BUCKEYE DRAWN BY: DATE: MJH 3/14/12 CHECKED BY: DATE: SMW 3/14/12 END PROJECT 'INDIANA AVE. j. TI NORA AVE. t F — PROPOSE - SIDEWALK BEGIN PROJECT -/ PROJECT VICINITY SPOKANE COM COLLEGE R S_I O 6H N EUCLID j a V) T SPOKANE RIVER Y a MS ARREINE> < KNOX NITY w w NSGOMER BROADW INTERSTATE FAIR GUNU 3RD a L a U 8TH 4TH AY EWAY Spokane jValley SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROPOSED PROJECT PARK ROAD SINTO TO INDIANA DRAWN BY: DATE: MJH 3/14/12 CHECKED BY: DATE: SMW 3/14/12 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 20, 2012 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2011 Pavement Management Plan GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: The Pavement Management Plan was discussed at the Council Retreat in February. This will be a continuation of that discussion primarily to discuss the methodology of the Plan. The intent is to work toward Council approval of the Pavement Management Plan at a future meeting. Approval would establish the Plan as the City's planning level document for street preservation and serve as the basis for funding discussions. Approval does not bind the City to any of the budget scenarios. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to bring the Pavement Management Plan back to Council for approval. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Approval of the Plan does not bind the City to any of the funding options. Funding and budget impact will occur as appropriations are discussed. STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten ATTACHMENTS: Presentation, Draft 2011 Pavement Management Plan �%` F valley Street Master Plan Pavement Management Program UPDATE 2011 (J-U-B Stiokane� Street MIster Plan .. Valley Pavement Management Program 2011 Update Process • Utilized Automated Pavement Inspection technology • Field Inspected one-third of Local Streets • Field Inspected half of the Arterials (WSDOT req 'd ) • Updated Computer Database • Consolidated road Segments • Evaluated Pavement Condition Changes 2011 • Refined Priorities, Protocols, and Procedures • Developed New Budgets • Current 2011 Budget Provided by CSV • Full recommended Budget 2012 to 2017 Stiokane� Street MIster Plan .. Valley Pavement Management Program Good c c E co 0 Poor Pavement Preservation Reconstruction t .aril ice. • Rehabilitation Stiokane� Street MIster Plan .. Valley Pavement Management Program Pavement Preservation Routine Maintenance Rehabilitation • Patching • Shouldering Preventive Maintenance • Crack Sealing • Severe Crack Seal • Fog Sealing • Thin overlays • Chip Seal (Test Project on Barker Road ) • Asphalt Overlays • Mill & Asphalt Overlays Stiokane� Street MIster Plan .. Valley Pavement Management Program Preservation vs. Reconstruction • Preservation treatments are designed to be proactive , applied while the pavement is still in good condition and maintains the pavement at a high level of service Versus • Reconstruction is reactive repair to existing severely distressed pavement • Most common approach to pavement maintenance Stiokane� Street MIster Plan _.. Valley Pavement Management Program Impact of Reconstruction vs. Mt & Overlay Projects • Project cost is 4 to 6 times more than preservation • Major Impact to businesses during construction • Traffic congestion for the public • Traffic safety concerns during construction • Significant increase in the time needed to construct the project Scliorkane Street MIster Plan Valley Pavement Management Program 40,00 2012 Pavement Management Plan Arterials Collectors & (residential) Local Access Roads Preventive $ 175, 000 $500, 000 Mill and Overlay $5, 825, 000 $2, 500, 000 Total Preservation $6, 000, 000 $3, 000, 000 Total Reconstruction $2, 500, 000 $1 , 787, 000 Total Preservation & Reconstruction $13,287,000 Estimate Revenue $2, 300, 000 Total Unfunded $10,987,000 201 Treahnents Mill d Overlay ▪ Reacnstruct rreventstive Maintenance 2017 Treatments Mill&Overlay - Reconstruct - -Prevenlatioe Maintenance Arterials and Collectors City of Spokane Valley 2012 - 2017 Preservation Projects Map 02.07.9174.1. February 1,2912 2012 Treatments Mil&1yruLar Reconstruct Legend 21115 Treahnents Mill$Oveildy - Reconstruct Preuentatiwe Maintenance - -Preveniatiue Maintenance 2013 Treatments Mil&Overlay Reconstruct rreventerare Maintenance 2014 Treatments Mil&Overlay Reconstruct -Preventative Maintenance Sikikane Street MIster Plan Valley Pavement Management Program ,„••••••v Six Year Existing Budget Arterials (2012-2017) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Arterials 65 63 62 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 60 59 0 1 $2. 1 Million Annual Budget 58 2 3 4 5 Plan Year Sikikane Street MIster Plan jValley Pavement Management Program Six Year Existing Budget Locals (2012-2017) 100 90 80 70 60 40 30 20 10 0 71 Locals 68 63 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 61 0 1 $200,000 Annual Budget 58 2 3 4 5 Plan Year Sikikane Street MIster Plan jValley Pavement Management Program Funding Options Discussion Option 1 • Full funding at $ 10,987,000 Option 2 • Fund Preservation only at $6,700,000 Option 2 • Fund the Arterial Preservation Shortfall = $4,000,000 • Fund partial Residential Shortfall = $500,000 • Request Grant Funding for Reconstruction Projects Option 3 • Other?? Sikikane Street MIster Plan Valley Pavement Management Program ,„••••••v Next Steps 1 . Approve the Plan 2. Develop a Funding Plan ne Street Master Plan Pavement Management Program Pavement Management Plan Update 20 Prepared • City of Spokane Valley Septembe , 2011 fjUB 4 J-U-B Engineers, Inc. 422 W. Riverside Avenue, Suite 304 Spokane, Washington 99201-0302 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE 2011 1 INTRODUCTION 1 REPORT HIGHLIGHTS 3 2011 ANALYSIS AND UPDATE 7 1 . Segment Consolidation 7 2. Automated Pavement Inspection 8 Local Access (residential) Street Deterioration 9 Pavement Performance Issues and Recommendations 10 Evaluation of Repair and Maintenance Treatments 11 BUDGET SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT 13 Arterial and Collectors 13 Local Access (residential) Streets 19 RECOMMENDATIONS 25 APPENDICES 1 . AUTOMATED PAVEMENT INSPECTIONS METHODOLOGY 2. PROJECT EVALUATION RECOMMENDATIONS 3. DETERIORATION OF ROAD SEGMENTS 4. COMPARISON OF PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX (PCI) AND OVERALL CONDITION INDEX (OCI) 5. ARTERIAL PROJECTS 2011 OCI Map: Arterials and Collectors Arterials and Collectors, 2012 — 2017 Projects Map — Overlays, Reconstruction, and Preventative Maintenance • 2012-2017 Proposed Budget —Arterials and Collectors — Preservation and Maintenance Projects List and Cost 6. LOCAL ACCESS (RESIDENTIAL) PROJECTS 2011 OCI Map: Local Access (Residential) Local Access (Residential), 2012 — 2017 Projects Map — Overlays, Reconstruction, and Preventative Maintenance • 2012-2017 Proposed Budget — Local Access (Residential) — Preservation and Maintenance Projects List and Cost PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE 2011 INTRODUCTION In June of 2007, the city completed their first development of a citywide Pavement Management Plan (PMP) and in 2008 the first update was completed. This update to the PMP is intended as an effort to monitor roadway pavement conditions on an ongoing basis. RCW 46.68.113 requires "large cities" to collect pavement condition data on the functionally classified Arterial and Collector network every two years. The pavement condition data is due to the Washington State Department of Transportation in September every even numbered year. J-U-B ENGINEERS INC. (J-U-B) assisted the City of Spokane Valley with this effort and submitted the pavement conditions per the RCW. This 2011 update includes additional field condition inspections of city streets and input of updated data into a computer model, Cartegraph Pavement View and Pavement View Plus. The computer model allows the City to analyze and rate the city streets by Overall Condition Index (OCI) of 0 (failed) to 100 (new). The primary goal of a PMP is to develop long term maintenance strategies that minimize the costs to the city. Instrumental in that effort is maximizing the maintenance of roads through annual crack sealing and fog sealing, while minimizing major rehabilitation and reconstruction costs. Budget scenarios were developed for existing city funding levels to compare with proposed funding levels that attempt to maintain the streets at a minimum average 70 OCI for Arterials/Collectors and 65 OCI for Local Access (residential) roads. This report updates the results of 2010 field inspections, modeling updates and modified recommendations for budget strategies. As recommended in the 2007 report, roadway condition surveys should occur bi-annually for Arterials, and every three to five years for Local Access (residential) roads. Over time, the data will aid the city in establishing road condition trends and appropriate budget forecasting. Major components of the 2011 Update include the following: 1 sv 2011 pmp 1-23-12 ➢ Use of an Automated Pavement Inspection Process. (Infrastructure Management Services [IMS] was tasked with completing the Automated Pavement Process) Previously inspections were conducted visually. ➢ Field inspected one-third of Local Access (residential) streets. (PMP recommended re-inspecting all Local Access (residential) streets every three- five years.) ➢ Field inspected one-half of the Arterial roads. (WSDOT bi-annual report on Arterials was due in the fall of 2010). ➢ Consolidated the Road Network Segments from 5,000 to 2,000. ➢ Updated the Cartegraph computer database. Updated Activity Unit Costs, input construction projects over the past three years including Septic Tank Elimination Program (STEP) projects. ➢ Evaluated pavement condition changes experienced in 2010. ➢ Refined project prioritization, protocols, and strategy procedures. ➢ Analyzed budget strategies to evaluate the impact on long term roadway conditions to include: o The current $2.3 million City budget o Budget needed to maintain the desired OCI and prevent additional road segments from falling into the reconstruction OCI range 2 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 REPORT HIGHLIGHTS Table 1 summarizes the City's estimated 2012 annual street Maintenance & Rehabilitation (M&R) revenue distribution. Preservation includes work such as crack sealing, fog sealing, patching, shoulder repair, grading, and overlays and mill & overlays. Major reconstruction involves total reconstruction of the roadway, including the base material. This estimated revenue was provided by City staff as the baseline for evaluating strategies for future recommendations. Table 1 . 2012 Estimated Annual City Streets M&R Anticipated Revenue Distribution for Pavement Preservation Estimate Future 2012 City Revenue City Revenue Capital Projects $300,000 $800000 Street Maintenance Fund $1 ,500,000 $1 ,500000 Street Maintenance $500,000 Fund* Total $2,300,000 $ 2,300,000 *One-time contribution from Street Maintenance Fund undesignated fund balance. The principle of pavement management is to perform regular maintenance of the roadways at lower costs and retain a higher overall pavement condition. The goal being to minimize or delay higher cost reconstruction in future years. The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) is the agency that recommends historical pavement characteristics. The general overall Pavement Deterioration Curve recommended by ASTM shows that $1 of preservation at 75% of its life will cost $4 to $10 if delayed until 40% of its life remains. Figure 1 depicts this relationship of condition deterioration over time. For example, completing a maintenance project such as crack sealing on a road segment with 75% of life remaining will cost 8 to 10 times less than allowing that road to deteriorate to a level that would require a full reconstruction. The cost differential It should be noted that$1 million dollars of the $2.3 million dollar budget is typically allocated to PMP related projects to address immediate needs such as pothole repairs, patches, one-lane overlays. The dollars allocated for these repairs may or may not be listed in the PMP plan but these repairs do provide improvements to the road segment OCI. 3 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 between mill and overlay and reconstruction is on the order of 4 to 6 times more for reconstruction projects. Figure 1. General Pavement Deterioration Curve Crack Seal Mill & Overlay Excellent — a 40% drop in quality Each $1 of repair Good - ' 75% of life not done here . . .will cost $4 o Fair - o to $10 if U 40% drop In delayed to quality a) Poor - here 12% of life a Failed 1 I [ 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I l I r 1 I l 11 1 1•f 5 10 15 20 25 30 Year Results of the field inspections and computer analysis of existing roads in 2011 finds that the overall OCI for the road network compared to 2008 is as follows: 2008 2011 2017 • Arterial/Collector OCI 67 64 58 • Local Access (residential) OCI 71 71 58 The projected OCI for the Arterial/Collector roads is expected to deteriorate to an OCI of 58 by the end of 2017 using the current estimated $2.1 million dollar Arterial budget. The projected OCI for the Local Access (residential) roads is expected to deteriorate to an OCI of 58 by the end of 2017 using the current $200,000 Local Access (residential) 4 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 road budget. Figures 2a and 2b illustrate this predicted pavement condition deterioration over the next 6 years for both Arterial and Local Access (residential) roads using the current $2.3 million dollar budget. The 2008 Report projected the 2010 Arterial OCI to be 68 using the City's projected budget of$2.9 million dollars annual average. The report also predicted a 2010 Local Access (residential) OCI of 63 using the City's projected average annual budget of$1.7 million dollars. The OCI increase for the Local Access (residential) roads can be attributed to the STEP projects as described below. The decrease in OCI for the Arterial roads from 67 in 2008 to 64 in 2011 can be attributed to several factors including a decline in grant funding and database refinements such as segment consolidation and updated pavement inspection information. The key factor for the OCI decrease was due to the lack of significant projects in the year 2010 and 2011. This budget does not include grant or STEP dollars received by the City to fund the reconstruction or upgrade of Arterial roads. The 2011 Updated Arterial OCI follows closely the projected trend from the 2008 report showing a difference in OCI of 4 points. The Local Access (residential) roads are showing a substantial increase in OCI from 2008 to 2011 . Two reasons for the increase in Local Access (residential) roads OCI are 1) the analysis software did not account for predicted future STEP projects and 2) the 2010 analysis has included three years of substantial completed STEP projects. The software does not provide for the inclusion of future anticipated projects, only predicted projects defined by the program protocols. In the future, anticipated projects will need to be incorporated into the program by hand to account for their impact on road condition. 5 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 Figure 2a. Predicted Six-Year OCI Using 2010 M & R Revenue (Arterials) Arterials 100 90 Excellent 80 69 Very Good 70 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 60 Good — 0 50 — 40 ■ ■ ■ Fair 30 ■ •• Poor • 20 — 10 ■ ■ ■ Very Poo • • • 0 Failed 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (2010) Plan Year (2017) Figure 2b. Predicted Six-Year OCI Using 2010 M & R Revenue (Local) Locals 100 — 90 Excellent — 80 74 71 Very Good— — 69 68 66 70 63_ 61 58 60 ■ ■ ■ Good ■ ■ - O 50 = = = = = - - = = - 40 30 ■ ■ ■ Poor ■ ■ ■ 20 Very Poo = = - 10 Failed 0 I I I I I I I I 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (2010) Plan Year (2017) 6 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 Several strategies were evaluated to develop a future budget that would continue to maintain the overall city roads. The 2011 recommendations are separated into functionally classified roads, (Arterials and Collectors), and Local Access (residential) roads. As established in previous reports, the goal over time is to maintain a 70 OCI for Arterials/Collectors and a 65 OCI for Local Access (residential) roads. Another condition was added to ensure additional road segments do not fall into the reconstruction status. Table 1 illustrates a comparison of funding levels for 2007 and 2011 . Grant funds for maintenance and rehabilitation projects such as mill and overlays have decreased over the last three years. Table 1 also shows the 2012 estimated City Revenue for road preservation and rehabilitation for both Arterials and Local Access (residential) roads. 2011 ANALYSIS AND UPDATE Updating the citywide PMP began with field inspection of one-third of the Local Access (residential) streets and half of the Arterial streets. The PMP recommends inspecting all of the Local Access (residential) streets in a three year cycle and all of the Arterials and Collectors every two years. Two significant changes occurred this year in the process of analyzing the road systems. 1 . The massive data files for each individual roadway segment were consolidated into more manageable segments, thus streamlining analysis. 2. Inspections were conducted using automated equipment rather than visual field inspections These two changes described in detail below, have added a significant level of difficulty to this year's analysis when compared against the old data. 1. Segment Consolidation The large pavement database was consolidated into larger road segments, reducing the database from 5,000 to approximately 2,000 segments. The consolidation process involved re-segmenting the roads into more logical and longer segments. Previously the database road segments were broken down by each city block, each segment being one block. The road network has been re-calibrated; segments now begin and end at a functionally classified road. For example, Sprague Avenue from University to 7 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 Evergreen is now two segments instead of 10. Since the 2008 update the amount of historical data in the database has grown substantially. This historical data, including, past mill and overlay projects, reconstruction projects, STEP projects, crack seal projects, mill and inlay projects, etc. have been used to update and refine the database. 2. Automated Pavement Inspection A significant change to the field inspection procedures for the 2011 update included using Automated Inspection instead of the manual (visual) inspection conducted in the past. Automated field inspection provided several advantages such as: ➢ Time savings ➢ Safety ➢ Consistency ➢ Easily input into the Cartegraph database In previous updates field inspection was accomplished using manual inspection by field personnel consisting of 4 -6 people in groups of two. Each group went out into the field to measure pavement distress on a sample segment basis. The inspections covered approximately two-fifths of all of the Local Access (residential) roads and all of the Arterials and Collectors. This work took approximately three months to complete. Using the automated field inspection method one-half of the Arterials and Collectors and one-third of the Local Access (residential) roads were cataloged in five days. The automated inspection is by far safer in that staff will no longer have to venture into the traveled lanes to measure or review pavement distresses. All work is done inside the comfort of a vehicle. Consistency increased due to the highly technical equipment used for the automated inspection. The tools used to measure distress do not rely on a subjective human eye. All of the pavement inspection data collected using automation was successfully transferred into the existing Cartegraph database. This saved several days of database 8 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 manipulation and formatting. While the cost of inspection increased, the cost of data manipulation decreased for an overall net zero (0) cost differential. IMS was chosen to provide the automated pavement inspection for this project. IMS had the ability to meet the schedule and provide high quality inspection information for the model. IMS also has a Cartegraph expert on their staff to manage the data transfer into the existing database. Refer to Appendix for additional IMS inspection information. Local Access (residential) Street Deterioration Figure 3 shows the deterioration curves used in the City's analysis. The first line, "Fitted Spokane Valley OCI curve (Local)" is the deterioration curve for the Local Access (residential) roads only. The second curve is the default deterioration curve for the Arterials, Collector and Local Access (residential) roads as provided by the Cartegraph software and the third curve is the PCI curve. The difference between the OCI and PCI is that the PCI is calculated solely based on the pavement inspections. The OCI is calculated based on the pavement inspection, pavement age, pavement type. See Appendix 4.Figure 3. Option 1 — Comparison of Deterioration Curves Arterial/Collector OCI Comparison 120 - 100 Fitted 80 Spokane Valley OCI 60 Curve Cr) Local efau t OCl 0 40 - (Arterial & Local) 20 - Curve 0 � _ PCI Curve -20 - — 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 35 40 Age 9 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 Initially the standard, default ASTM deterioration curves were used in the analysis. Since the 2006 and 2008 updates a historical database has been collected. The historical data can now be used to refine the pavement deterioration and OCI curves to fit actual conditions. As a result, the Local Access (residential) OCI deterioration curve has been updated based on the historic information. See Figure 3. The OCI curve for Arterials and Collectors will be retained until the historic data analysis results in a curve update. The Local Access (residential) OCI deterioration curve was updated based on 1-2 years of pavement inspections between 2006 and the 2011 update. Over the past 4 years we have inspected all Local Access (residential) roads at least once and in some cases multiple times. The curve adjustment is based on the inspection of each of the approximately 1 ,700 Local Access (residential) road segments. It was very clear that the curve based on pavement inspections did not follow the standard ASTM curve as shown in Table 3. The Local Access (residential) road segments followed the fitted deterioration curve much more closely compared to the ASTM curve thus prompting the adjustment. The Arterial OCI deterioration curve is much more difficult to justify an adjustment with so few data points. There are 304 Arterial road segments, each road segment having been inspected at least 2 times. There are not enough inspection points to confidently adjust the Arterial deterioration curve at this time. Adjustments will be made after additional information is collected in future years. Pavement Performance Issues and Recommendations The City of Spokane Valley will need to continue to modify the deterioration curves to more accurately reflect the actual field conditions of the roadway network. There appears to be areas in which the Arterial/Collector roads are deteriorating prematurely. Included in the Appendix are examples of premature deterioration on Sprague and Appleway Boulevard. This section shows the OCI trends and an estimated cost to improve these road segments. Again, there is a serious need to reserve funds for ongoing maintenance of the road network. There is also a need to utilize current design 10 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 and construction standards to ensure that future overlay and reconstruction projects perform adequately for 20+ years. Road segments such as Sprague and Appleway, as described above, and Argonne are all showing signs of premature failure. These roads are showing substantial cracking and are nearing failure. These road segments are between 5-10 years old with a design pavement life of 20 years, yet these roads need overlays within the next few years. In order to prevent premature failure of the road section in the future the City conducted a pavement performance study in 2008. Some of the recommended changes are as follows: 1 . Increased geotechnical investigations of existing soil. 2. Accurate truck traffic assessments. 3. Require "Engineered" pavement section design. 4. Careful evaluation of asphalt cement mix design. 5. Increase minimum pavement section. 6. Increase fractured face requirement. 7. Increase moisture and compaction compliance testing. 8. Enhanced joint and pavement density compaction requirements. 9. Improved asphalt temperature monitoring and placement. 10.Use of stabilized subbase (Asphalt or Cement Treated Base). The full extent of the report developed by J-U-B can be found under separate cover in "Pavement Performance Issues and Recommendations" October, 2008. Evaluation of Repair and Maintenance Treatments The City of Spokane Valley is in need of an effective surface treatment between crack sealing and overlay for the Arterial/Collector and Local Access (residential) road network. Potential solutions include Fog Seals, Seal Coats, Slurry Seals and Micro- Pave. Fog seal is not an effective treatment in extending the life of the pavement for the higher volume Arterials/Collectors roadways. As a result, the City may want to experiment with various treatments over time to find the most effective preventive maintenance treatment. Identifying and using a high quality surface treatment 2-3 years 11 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 prior to mill and overlay will bring down the long-term cost by further extending the life of the pavement. A high quality surface treatment could delay the need for a mill and overlay 3-5 years assuming the treatment is done on the correct road segment and at the appropriate time. It is recommended that the City select 2-3 treatments to be applied to several roadways throughout the city. City staff will evaluate the performance of the treatments on a yearly basis. Once the City is confident on the performance of a particular treatment it will be added to the PMP as a recommended activity for future years. This treatment will be used to bridge the gap between crack seal and mill and overlay. A potential solution to fill this gap is a seal coat called GSB88. GSB88 seal coat rejuvenates the asphalt by penetrating the surface asphalt. GSB88 contains polymers that adhere to the aggregates thus adding new life the oxidized asphalt. Typical Fog Seals such as a CSS-1 h do not penetrate the asphalt; the oil remains on the top surface and tends to wear out more quickly over time. The goal being to extend the life of the pavement 3-5 years until an overlay can be completed. This type of treatment allows the City to extend the life of pavements while preventing the road segment from falling into the reconstruction category, a much more costly alternative. J-U-B's recommendation is to conduct site specific test seal coats to gauge the potential of this and other products. The City has discovered a treatment for severe longitudinal joint cracking. This crack seal material is used to seal the longitudinal pavement joints on Arterial/Collector roadways. The crack repair material is called Deery Level and Go, manufactured by Craftco. This product has been successfully applied to the failed longitudinal joints on Thierman, Dishman-Mica, 32nd with great success. The advantages of this product are as follows: • Structurally sound material — this material can withstand heavy traffic loads while being flexible to allow for shrinking and swelling. • Plastic — this material is very flexible and will not pull away from the existing asphalt during times of expansion and contraction. 12 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 • This product is very easy to apply and will setup quickly to minimize road closures/restrictions. This treatment will improve and extend the life of a road which a failed longitudinal pavement joint is the only real distress in the that particular segment. BUDGET SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT The 2011 Pavement Management Plan Update evaluated the impact to road conditions for various City budgets moving forward. In the current economic state, additional funding options are limited. This budget analysis update will attempt to keep as many of the pavements from serious deterioration as possible. The 2011 update evaluates two options for funding the maintenance of streets with limited budget over the next six years until a more focused program can be developed: ➢ Option 1 — Continue with 2011 revenue of$2,100,000 for Arterials and Collectors and $200,000 for Local Access (residential) streets. The overall network OCI is expected to be much lower than 70. ➢ Option 2 — Establish a budget that maintains a "good" rating equal to a 65 OCI for Local Access (residential) streets and a "very good" rating equal to a 70 OCI for Arterials and Collectors. The results of these options are presented herein for both the Arterial and Collectors and the Local Access (residential) streets separately. These are separated since they use different deterioration curves while preventing additional roads from falling into the reconstruction OCI range. Arterial and Collectors In general, the changes to the protocols and priorities have been refined and improved to give better OCI values and a project list that enables the City to select projects that will provide the most value for the dollar spent. Several of the high priority Arterial roads have mill & overlay work recommended within the six year forecast. As a result of not fully funding the 2008 pavement management plan, the analysis identified 14 road segments that are currently failed with an OCI less than 30. The list of failed road 13 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 segments is summarized below. The goal is to head off more expensive future reconstruction projects as well as preventing future roads from falling into the reconstruction OCI range. In addition to costing 4-6 times more than preservation projects, reconstruction results in other significant impacts. • Increase in the time needed to construct the project • Major Impact to businesses on or near the project • Traffic congestion for the motoring public • Traffic safety concerns during construction Tables 3 and 4, and figures 4a & 4b summarize the six year projects for both Option #1 and Option #2 and compares the OCI trend. Option 2 will maintain an average 70 OCI and prevent future roads from falling into the reconstruction range. Reconstruction project costs are not included in the Option 2 budget at this time. The reconstruction project list is provided to give the City the option to reconstruct these roads as funds become available. Roads that are failed may not necessarily need to be reconstructed immediately, project evaluation should occur on a case-by-case basis. Over the six year program we recommend the reconstruction projects be systematically improved at a rate of$2.83 million per year. As described above, there are currently 14 road segments that are in need of a reconstruction. If steps are not taken to maintain the existing pavements immediately this number will steadily grow over time. For example, if no action is taken in 2012, the number of roads in the reconstruction category grows from 14 to 19 road segments. 14 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 2011 Proposed Budget-Arterials and Collectors-Preservation Program City of Spokane Valley 2011 Pavement Management Plan Update Project No. Segment ID OCI Route From To Plan Activity Number of Lanes Pavement Area(SF) Improved OCI Plan Cost Suggested Budget** Over/Under Suggested Budget Stormwater Upgrades (Y/N) Plan Year Reconstruction Projects: 27 68 23.27 Sprague Av Evergreen Adams AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 7 232919 99.68 $3,125,772.98 51 69 25.3 Sprague Av Adams Sullivan AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 7 234429 99.68 $3,146,037.18 75 11 21.42 Euclid Av Barker End AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 52665 99.68 $706,769.67 76 10 27 Flora AC-f ct-- - IMP 2 133870 27.3 $1, 10 104 9 21.42 Euclid Av End Sullivan AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 38434 99.68 $515,790.72 105 206 22.06 Madison Rd 40th MADISON AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 107581 99.68 $1,443,741.31 106 245 27.96 Flora Rd Euclid Trent Atruct-Aral 2 94153 27.96 $1,263,533.26 124 1902 28.41 Euclid Av Sullivan Marietta AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 145693 99.68 $1,955,203.28 125 215 17.15 Progress Rd Wellesley Crown AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 32860 99.68 $440,989.52 126 145 . .. A . _ -. .. ,-_x 2 0 • 28.93 ii 1903 29.21 Euclid Av Marietta Flora AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 99322 99.68 $1,332,902.31 146 246 25.03 Flora Rd Euclid Euclid AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 18240 99.68 $244,780.80 147 1906 24.73 Sullivan Rd Wellesley End AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 2 29172 99.68 $391,500.05 148 :y 4th AC-Reconstruct-Arterial 16803 29.63 _ $226 Sub-total $17,086,075.86 ** The City of Spokane Valley's budget total is$2.3 million dollars.$1.O million dollars of the$2.3 million is spent on PMP related projects such a The highlighted roadways could have been overlayed in 2008,now the recommended treatment is a full reconstruct The highlighted roadways could have been overlayed in 2011,now the recommended treatment is a full reconstruct There are 17 consolidated roads in 2008 that are shown as needing a reconstruction. veral of which have been reconstructed or h. Note:The cost between a mill and overlay and full reconstruction is approximately 6times sv 2011 pmp 1-23-12 e repairs,patching,single lane overlays and other immediate needs as they arise. justment based on the 2010IMS inspection 15 Table 3 indicates that continuing at the present budget will result in a downward trend in overall pavement condition for Arterials and Collectors. If this is not reversed, the cost for future repairs will increase as described in the general ASTM Deterioration Curve Figure 1. Table 3. Option 1 — Six Year Budget at $2.1 Million Year Total OCI 2012 $2,100,000 65.1 2013 $2,100,000 63.4 2014 $2,100,000 61.7 2015 $2,100,000 60.3 2016 $2,100,000 58.9 2017 $2,100,000 57.5 Total $12,600,000 Figure 4a - Option 1 — Six Year Budget at $2.1 Million Arterials 100 90 80 70 65 63 62 60 59 58 60 7 50 , • • 0 40 , • • 30 I • • 20 • • 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 (2012) Plan Year 16 sv 2011 pmp 1-23-12 Table 4. Option 2 - Six Year Need Year Total OCI 2012 $5,663,000 67.8 2013 $6,058,000 68.4 2014 $6,184,000 69.2 2015 $6,163,000 70.1 2016 $6,203,000 71.0 2017 $6,053,000 71.5 Total $36,322,000 Table 4 shows the ongoing funding must be increased by approximately $4,000,000 annually to maintain a 70 OCI. The total plan year budget represents $175,000 in preventative maintenance with the balance dedicated to mill and overlay projects. Figure 4b - Option 2 - Six Year Budget Arterials 100 90 80 68 68 69 70 71 72 70 60 0 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 (2012) Plan Year 17 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 Figures 5 and 6 graphically compare the budgets and OCI for Options 1 and 2. Figure 5. Arterial Streets Budget Comparison $10.0 - $9.0 $8.0 = $7.0 = $6.0 I — o o $5.0 $4.0 $3.0 _ $2.0 — $1.0 I $0.0 - 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Budget Year •2011 Option 1,$2.1 M 02011 Option 2,Maintain Level 70 OCI Figure 6. Arterial Streets OCI Comparison Arterial/Collector OCI Comparison 75 - 70 65 60 U 0 55 ` Z 50 - Option 1,$2.1M • Option 2 45 - — Do Nothing 40 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Budget Year 18 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 Local Access (residential) Streets The tables and charts below show the resultant pavement conditions using the existing funding level compared to a budget option for maintaining the Local Access (residential) street network at a 65 OCI level. Tables 5 and 6 summarize the six year needs for Options 1 and 2. Table 5. Option 1 - Six Year Budget at $200,000 Year Total OCI 2012 $200,000 70.8 2013 $200,000 68.3 2014 $200,000 65.8 2015 $200,000 63.3 2016 $200,000 60.7 2017 $200,000 58.2 $1,200,000 Figure 7a — Six Year Budget at $200,000 Locals 100 90 80 71 70 68 66 63 61 60 58 0 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 (2012) Plan Year 19 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 Table 6. Option 2 — Six Year Need Year Total OCI 2012 $2,999,000 73.4 2013 $2,776,000 72.2 2014 $2,999,000 70.8 2015 $2,996,000 69.5 2016 $2,899,000 68.0 2017 $2,996,000 66.5 $18,001,000 Figure 7b — Six Year Budget at $3 Million Dollars Locals 100 90 80 73 72 71 70 68 70 67 60 O 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Plan Year At the present budget, the pavement condition will deteriorate beyond the desired 65 OCI level. Even with Option 2 funding increases, the pavement conditions will still deteriorate slowly over time. But the Option 2 funding level will keep the local access OCI at or above 65 though the year 2019. 20 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 Funding has been lacking for Local Access (residential) street projects. Local Access (residential) streets make up approximately 85% of the city's street network. Typically the maintenance treatment costs for these streets is lower than that for Arterials and Collectors so money spent on Local Access (residential) streets will go further and last longer than money spent on the classified roads. Figure 8 compares the funding levels for each option. Figure 8. Local Access (residential) Street Budget Comparison $4.0 $3.5 - $3.0 - $2.5 N o $2.0 - $1.5 - $1.0 - $0.5 - $0.0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Budget Year •Option 1,$200K •Option 2,$3,000,000 21 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 Comparing pavement condition for each option in Figure 8, it can be seen that the Local Access (residential) street network is in good condition now but its condition is dropping rapidly under the existing funding level. Over the past three years the Local Access (residential) road OCI has improved due to the Spokane County STEP program. The program resulted in a complete reconstruction for many of the Local Access (residential) roads that otherwise would have not received a treatment. Each year of delay in increasing Local Access (residential) street funding adds a significant cost to keep the Local Access (residential) streets at a 65 OCI and maintaining that level. Figure 9. Local Access (residential) Street OCI Comparison Local Street OCI Comparison 75 - 70 Alikbb■ ♦ ♦ 65 U ♦ O 60 -Option 1 ♦ -Option 2 55 — — Do Nothing 50 , 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Budget Year Most of the recommended Local Access (residential) road work is focused in the area of the city south of Sprague between Dishman-Mica Road and Sullivan Road. Local Access (residential) street projects were grouped together by neighborhood as much as possible. This resulted in some streets being done ahead of others for the sake of efficiency over the identified priority of work. There may be situations where a street segment is omitted from work even when adjacent segments are done because it is in too poor of condition to be overlaid and there is not enough funding for reconstruction. It is possible some of these roads could 22 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 have minor repairs done and then be overlaid rather than reconstructed but the decision must be made by city staff on a case-by-case basis. Reconstruction project costs are not included in the Option 2 budget at this time. The reconstruction project list is provided to give the City the option to reconstruct these roads as funds become available. Roads that are failed may not necessarily need to be reconstructed immediately, project evaluation should occur on a case-by-case basis. Over the six year program we recommend the reconstruction projects be systematically improved at a rate of$1 .79 million per year. As described above, there are currently 27 road segments that are in need of a reconstruction. If steps are not taken to maintain the existing pavements immediately this number will steadily grow over time. 23 SV 2011 PMP 1-23-12 2011 Proposed Budget-Local Access(Residential)Roads-Preservation Program City of Spokane Valley 2011 Pavement Management Plan Update Segment ID OCI Segment ID\Route Segment ID\Route Back Segment ID\Route Ahead Plan Activity Segment ID\Number of Lanes Segment ID\Pavement Area Improve d OCI Plan Cost Plan Year Reconstruction Projects 1953 17.76 Vera Crest Dr End 24th AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 143326.80 17.76 $1,686,956.44 605 11.15 Jackson Cul-De-Sac Dr End Jackson 928 14.89 Whipple Rd End Main 597 18.05 Marietta Av McMillan Montgomery 1715 18.1 Sonora Dr 24th End 1594 18.5 20th Ct Vera Crest 607 20.94 Montgomery Cul-De-Sac Dr Montgomery 1006 21.5 Alki Av Barker 604 29.47 McMillan Rd Montgomery 606 9.04 Montgomery Cul-De-Sac Dr Montgomery 554 21.69 Bridgeport Av End 1703 22 Best Rd 24th 1960 22.94 33rd Av Pierce 300 29.63 Mansfield Av End 1923 23.61 Balfour Rd End En Mich End Barker Sprague AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 4600.00 11.15 $54,142.00 AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 5020.08 14.89 $59,086.34 AC-Reconstruction-Local AC-Recons n-Local AC-Reco on-Local AC-Recons ction-Local 2 25262.40 18.05 $297,338.45 2 28702.08 18.1 $337,823.48 2 17603.60 18.5 $207,194.37 2 3800.00 20.94 $44,726.00 AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 38822.16 21.5 $456,936.82 AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 34139.20 29.47 $401,818.38 AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 4520.00 9.04 $53,200.40 AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 51446.00 21.69 $605,519.42 2nd AC-Reconstruction-L 2 58428.04 22 $687,698.03 odward AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 41018.00 22.94 $482,781.86 Eastern AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 41543.36 29.63 $488,965.35 Main AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 21237.12 23.61 $249,960.90 550 24.02 Kiernan Av End Sullivan AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 43423.60 24.02 $511,095.77 1599 24.14 Conklin Ct 22nd End 1915 24.19 Dollar Rd Trent Utah 1595 24.56 22nd Av Vera Crest Conklin AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 7600.00 24.14 $89,452.00 Reconstruction-Local 2 38698.20 24.19 $455,477.81 AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 47247.12 24.56 $556,098.60 1233 25.81 6th Av Farr Woodruff AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 25962.00 25.81 $305,572.74 863 26.07 Dyer Rd Sprague End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 7860.80 26.07 $92,521.62 865 26.07 Val leyway Av Park Ella AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 40329.60 26.07 $474,679.39 305 26.18 Dickey Rd Trent Knox AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 16964.64 26.18 $199,673.81 380 27.72 University Rd End Montgomery AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 17464.60 27.72 $205,558.34 1601 27.93 Conklin Rd Vera Crest 23rd AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 68715.60 27.93 $808,782.61 1934 28.99 Buckeye Av Barker End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 68403.40 28.99 $805,108.02 1114 29.09 Elizabeth St 8th End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 8845.00 29.09 $104,105.65 Total $10,722,274.62 24 sv 2011 pmp 1-23-12 RECOMMENDATIONS The City's road network is one of its greatest assets. The current overall road condition is "very good", at the current funding levels the network will fall into the "fair" range within the next 4-5 years. The impact of which will result in future projects that will cost the City 4 — 10 times more than they would have if the road was maintained regularly. (Refer to Figure 1). The Arterial and collector roads need an annual funding level of approximately $6,000,000 to maintain a very good pavement condition. The Local Access (residential) roads represent approximately 85% of the City's road system. The maintenance budget for the Local Access (residential) streets needs to be increased to approximately $3,000,000 annually including funds allocated for overlays of those roads that are beyond maintenance. A list of the proposed Arterial and Local Access (residential) street projects for the next six years is provided in the Appendix. Table 7 summarizes the recommended street budget program to meet long-term maintenance needs of your facilities. Table 7 Recommended Annual Average Budget Local Access Arterials & (residential) Collectors Roads Preventive $ 175,000 $500,000 Mill and Overlay $5,825,000 $2,500,000 Total $6,000,000 $3,000,000 Reconstruction $2,500,000 $1,787,000 25 sv 2011 pmp 1-23-12 Appendix 1. Automated Pavement Inspections Methodology 2. Project Evaluation Recommendations 3. Deterioration of Road Segments 4. Comparison of Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and Overall Condition Index (OCI) 5. Arterial Projects 6. Local Access (residential) Projects Automated Pavement Inspections Methodology Automated Pavement Inspections Methodology For the Spokane Valley project, IMS used their Laser Road Surface Tester (RST) ; ..N_. enhanced with digital imagery and r GPS capabilities. The RST, with f its 11 laser sensors collected a full array of pavement condition data complete with high accuracy GPS coordinates and forward view digital images for both rigid and flexible pavements (in real time), as it traversed the roadway. An integrated Digital Condition Rating Subsystem supplements the RST data for additional distress data elements, quality assurance and inventory information. Specialized data processing, using GIS as its backbone, allows the pavement data to be quickly checked for completeness and quality. The main components of the Laser RST are: • A transducer bar with an array of 11 laser cameras, rate gyroscopes, inclinometers and accelerometers to measure pavement roughness, rutting, and cracking. • Digital Condition Rating Subsystem that was customized to collect a variety of roadway attributes and extent-severity based pavement distresses through trained operator input. • Ability to collect dual wheel path roughness to International Roughness Index (IRI) standards. • A single forward facing camera was mounted for IMS QA/QC procedures. The images can be provided for digital viewing purposes. • High accuracy Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver with inertial navigation for geo-locating of pavement and asset information with excellent accuracy. • Dual distance measuring instruments to measure linear distances to within +1- 0.5%. The distress data was collected continuously and then reported in 100 foot intervals, complete with their respective GPS coordinates. The data was then aggregated to the section level, following the sectioning and referencing methodology contained in the existing Spokane Valley Cartegraph database. Laser Camera Array The laser camera array collects automated pavement condition data in the form of roughness to International Roughness Index (IRI) — - standards, wheel path rutting, transverse - _ r _ cracking, block cracking, alligator cracking and ‘ texture. The technology driving the laser-camera ' = " array removes the subjective nature of pavement condition data collection. The pavement condition data was processed to provide extent-severity distress ratings that were loaded into Cartegraph. The data was collected in accordance with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers protocols commonly referred to as ASTM D6433-09. Digital Collection/Rating System (DCRS) The Digital Collection Rating System is a touch screen based tablet computer that allows the user to define what information (distresses & attributes) is to be collected and how it is to be quantified. The DCRS is integrated into the data flow through time code, GPS, distance, and inventory control. In the context of this survey, the DCRS was configured to be used as a data collection and checking device. Distress data was collected continuously, while inventory and attribute data was checked as the survey proceeded. Survey events (such as detours or obstructions) and inventory related items were collected and noted in the data. RST operators note the surveyed lane and direction on a section-by-section basis. Automated Pavement Inspection Adjustments/Calibration One aspect of the Automated Pavement Inspection that warranted a closer look was the "rutting" distress. Initially an observer would measure rutting in the field by visual means. Occasionally, a straightedge was used to measure the depth of rut but due to time constraints a majority of the rutting inspection was just visual. IMS used a rut bar to measure the depth and extents of rutting in a particular road segment. The rut bar uses extremely sensitive lasers to measure rutting as the inspection vehicle travels roadways. The laser measures to the nearest millimeter every 4'±to develop an average every 100 feet. In order to develop a baseline for rutting sensitivity J-U-B and IMS worked together to modify the range at which rutting was recorded by the rut bar. The original rutting scale from 6 mm to 25 mm was as follows: 6 — 13 millimeters low severity rutting (approximately 1/4" — 1/2") 13 — 25 millimeters moderate severity rutting (approximately 1/2" — 1") 25 millimeters high severity rutting (greater than 1") The baseline rutting scale shown above is based on ASTM D6433. However, the inspection procedures used for past pavement inspections where based on the Northwest Pavement Management Association's Pavement Surface Conditions Field Rating Manual for Asphalt Pavements, current edition. The discrepancy between the inspection methods leads to large discrepancies in the OCI. For example, in a typical road segment that is 2,640 feet long the IMS inspection would yield 660 data points where as the manual pavement inspection method would yield 2 points at best. Typically, the manual pavement inspection would yield a data point mid segment at a location most representative of the entire segment. Using the above scale the inspection by IMS using the rut bar is so accurate that any and all pavement anomalies would be interpreted as rutting which in turn translated in to a very low OCI for the actual age and condition of the roadway. J-U-B selected six roads to manually inspect this year (2011) in order to compare the overall inspection results as well as to more properly calibrate the rutting scale. Upon careful consideration and coordination with IMS, the rutting scale was adjusted to 10 mm to 25 mm as follows: 10 — 15 millimeters low severity rutting 15 — 25 millimeters moderate severity rutting 25 millimeters high severity rutting The adjustment was made to reduce the occurrence of anomalies being interpreted as rutting but at the same time retain the accuracy and consistency of the rut bar technology. With fewer occurrences of rutting throughout the road network, the OCI became more in line with the six manual test inspections (2011) and the 2008 manual road inspections. Project Evaluation Recommendations Project Evaluation Recommendations The following recommendations should be used during the street preservation project evaluation process, for both Maintenance and Rehabilitation projects as well as capital projects, just prior to the Pavement Design Phase. All prospective Arterials/Collectors planned for an overlay, mill and overlay or reconstruction should be cored to a minimum depth of 6-inches below existing subgrade. The advantages of taking cores prior to the pavement design are as follows: ➢ Determine if there is moisture in the base and sub-base course ➢ If the road had been previously overlaid, look for delamination ➢ Determine if a Performance Grade (PG) adjustment is necessary in the mix design, i.e. PG 64-28 vs. PG 70-28. ➢ Verify assumptions generally used for a pavement design The following recommendations may be considered during the construction process as a supplement to the WSDOT Standard Specifications: ➢ Verify moisture and compaction requirements through increased testing (2008 Pavement Management Plan Update) ➢ Enhanced joint density testing (2008 Pavement Management Plan Update) ➢ Enforce proper timing on asphalt delivery. Do not allow trucks to stack up waiting to be dumped. ➢ Diligent monitoring of asphalt temperature. Deterioration of Road Segments Deterioration of Road Segments The following section highlights 3 principle Arterial road segments and how each road has deteriorated over the past 3 years. The 3 road segments include: Route Back Route Ahead 2008 OCI 2010 OCI (Average) (Average) Sprague Havana to Fancher 67.5 55.6 Sprague Evergreen to Sullivan 31.5 24.3 Appleway Dishman-Mica to University 59.4 51.0 In 2008 the segment of Sprague from Evergreen to Sullivan would have been a borderline candidate for a mill and overlay. The OCI threshold for a mill and overlay is OCI 30-60, an OCI below 30 calls for a complete reconstruction. Had this section of Sprague been overlaid in 2008 the cost would have been approximately $2.7 million dollars. Moving forward as recommended in the current 2010 update would require a complete reconstruction with a cost of approximately $3.8 million dollars. The segments of Sprague from Havana to Fancher and Appleway from Dishman-Mica to University are currently great candidates for a mill and overlay because of the existing pavement condition. The 2011 update recommends Sprague from Havana to Carnahan be overlaid in 2014 and Sprague from Carnahan to Fancher be overlaid in 2013. Appleway from Dishman- Mica to Farr is recommended to be overlaid in 2014 and Appleway from Farr to University is recommended to be overlaid in 2012. Should no treatment be completed on these road segments, they will fall into the reconstruction range within the next 7 years. The currently recommended overlays costing $700k - $800k would cost well over $3 million per project if no treatments are done. In the interim between now and the time it would take to complete an overlay, the City may want to consider the following preventative maintenance: • Crack seal • Seal coat (GSB88 or similar) • One lane grind and overlay • Patching • Slurry Seal These maintenance measures will buy the city additional time until an overlay can be funded. This section is intended to emphasize the importance of following the PMP. It is recommended that the City increase funding so preventative maintenance is a top priority, followed by overlays, and lastly reconstruction projects. The goal is to maintain the City's roads at a high level OCI and to keep individual segments from falling into more costly treatment categories. This PMP update is especially critical because of the completion of the STEP projects. With the completion of the STEP projects the City will need to maintain hundreds of newly reconstructed roads both now and into the future to keep these roads in great condition. Comparison of Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and Overall Condition Index (OCI) Comparison of Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and Overall Condition Index (OCI) PCI OCI 1 . Longitudinal Cracks 1 . Longitudinal Cracks 2. Rutting 2. Rutting 3. Patches 3. Patches 4. Transverse Cracks 4. Transverse Cracks 5. Alligator Cracking 5. Alligator Cracking 6. Pavement Age 7. Pavement Type/ Structure Arterial Projects City of Spokane Valley 2011 Overall Condition Index Arterials and Collectors r j __. e _ ' ~ i� { 4 I. ' — _ __ • ~I •■• L 4 -- f ,'— _ +.=• -•i..�� • ., 4 overripe r 292811 - I• Ley end Overall CVnditi4 n Index -r_ap{Fad*j -d1-In Wedrrn 1a PPM - a1-iao{ca.aF rktre rwanroerkrta Arterials and Collectors City of Spokane Valley 2012 - 2017 Preservation Projects Map i :IIIII�C.1, 124 O. 76-Eucld A„v, 75 14 •;7a Miss on_HV = �nn■■i�51'I r:111 EiJ ' 111■.■■ ■ ■ 1 nag r ll:® ■■■.■■ • ■ �� Broadway-Av w ■■■Y■■ ■■ 1�■■ �.At..a W ZZ 9a February 1,2012 Legend 2015 Treatments Mill&Overlay - Reconstruct - •Preventative Maintenance 2016 Treatments Mill&Overlay - Reconstruct - •Preventative Maintenance 2017 Treatments Mill&Overlay Reconstruct - •Preventative Maintenance 2012 Treatments Mill&Overlay - Reconstruct —Preventative Maintenance 2013 Treatments Mill&Overlay - Reconstruct -•Preventative Maintenance 2014 Treatments Mill&Overlay - Reconstruct --Preventative Maintenance 2411 reverted Budget-Arlarisls wnel Culler lei -Pr.,..r egeun PrpO V h., Cd5rof S5o1ane V161f 1011 Prnnnent Management Ptsn LIAM% Prdie['t NO sc gmert FD ¢CI RRUte Frurn I T9 Plan Activity. Number of Lanes Pavement Ar'E.2(SF) Ilnriravcd OCI Plzen Cast Suggcneel Budget** Over/under sugg25ted midget StiOITreieter Upgrade rim) Mdn Year 21112 OrerhrNaierts: 1 37 35,22 Mbs1tS Ax 1•nl• Hen AC-MM and avertay Art 260426.2E 9 193 $142,66731 2 53 31.55 grpadyy55Ay 5repnapya Rartasr :A[- 455119nd Chnvir.Art 2 1113113.L211 3453 533 997.93 3 11 3732 Apvfgwiy51 Farr LnIgerslti AC-MI and CMcrlay Art 4 132461IM59 ft 9231 1455.205.54 4 BS 325 SthAs 6itlitrin MU 77rr AC-5101 131.7•crla•-Cat 2 431454 ft 64.18 5169,665.10 5 121 3522 72nd Pr Unhnrllty BoydIIA _ AC-Mil and Vier`-y Art 313756350 R 0453 5716306.73 5 122 40.1912ndAs Aber SR 27 OR A AC•Lim a.,l l.PrfayAr AC._M51 and n,arr+ay An 1199725.00Ft 95.75 '67544550 7 124 4054 32nd A. SR 27 2 75412A0 ft 93.36 $14,1214 B 152 4415 ArROnr.e Rd Roar Mont rxn ry AC_Mill a.,d r1,y All 6 51441.74 ft 9G.GL $122. 50,73 9 153 4054 Argomre Rd Madan %not AC-Mill and 0weelay Art 6 32973.72ft 9631 578.47735 14 151 Krt79chrnan1.4il1 P4 IN. 2440 hC Mel and'rallyArt 42,54145.490 It 95.74 S432.13,90 33 11 162 35.19 Dialer oe left Rd 2411. 32.1 AC.7.2111 and 19.eriny Art S 19418260 ft 95.74 542E/537_59 13 1IM 5164 anhnme Ara Rd 92nd 3r3rFr AC-mil and Berney Art S 9196324 ft 9453 $2313,157_52 13 173 31 Farr Rd $5a0r. Appder.ay AC.MI3&Overlay-Co1 E 26234.00 It 34.13 $49,1D3.91 _24 75 asp 35.17 Urine dl'Rd *SRrague Apples ray. AC*AEI and Overby Art 6 56637_46 1t 6336 5443,37636 161 34.University All ath I6th AC.MITI and tS.erby Art 4 11011090f 94.04 .34t1361.415 Fh 2n9 15.57 Aiwa Ed 19h 24th AC MIII nrd chnerby Art 7 90761.10R 99.7 5.77djt6R.7.6 17 242 M.1 Adams Rd 24111 _ End AC-Milleadt) r47yArt t'145,719.04ft 93.7 534,695E4 18 750 35.77 BarkcrRRd Euclid Toni AC Mill orrd O:trLaY Art 2 105411.21 It 46.61 5254,67675 19 251 9027 9.nher Rd End €add AC-Mill and Oheelay Art 2 49471.548 9633 SZ3793254 20 1607 3136 Farceur Rd 3[:44.. Broadway AC-Mill and Overlay Art S 15•S53896n 41.53 }441_723,4 21 1846 3696 Earthen Rd Broadway Sharp AC-Mill end Overlay Art 4794174.00 it 95.75 $1.68.94157 22 2114 39.42 Vela Rd Mitsieh trldQ AC-Mill 1 Overby•Oil 2 294232fift 13.5 553„91525 23 1179 4644 1141461 Rd Mad., End AC-Mill AOverlay•C.al 7 95_411 0It 14.78 577.76526 24 11361 3902 llnw9011ty Rd 5pr151te 451.3 AC•Mill alte Ov trim Art 4 35157.0071 4134 $93.633.66 25 18135 3.275 J1trenity RA 4111 Snr AC-Mill Ina Overlay AR S 53744.00tl 9.153 $142.190.72 2b 1146 N.11 fo.ndish Rd 16th 2419 AC•Mill mad Overlay Art E.43 h3.01)i1 9896 $267,15020 404-49#41 1 36345207,27 i600.900A0 Rtppn511011 miens '_ 27 68 .2323 Sprague AV Ev[rRreen Adams AC.Reddrlitruct. L,-.i.4 7 233919 99 8( 53.125.37298 S h.Mlttt ! $325.71591 5112111 I Maystomm=AYaindIrc Crack Seal and Patdring $575006.1110 Zupan_In0 Subtefil $175,066.30 1330.963.29 - - 6relemtal Overby and A.rreaathe 35.663.30717 T17101 Overlay Reeenalluelgon and P7eve 40re 56.799.4&725 i;itaixi.rYYl M L57ALR961125j the City o4 SpoloneValleyrs budget haul rs 525 millet.,dol Less$10molllon do-Mars ofthe$12 nuaana spent anfitP related'ragects such as pothole mews,patching,sink lane a19rkry7 and.dyer gland nark ac they arise. Sc h16Thghted rwdwxys wind have been.'.n.byed hn 794,near nce remmmerded trea1recntu a fu B nsoothsVUCs there are traonsolldated roads In 3906 that are shown as receding a yen nst-rstIon.Several el which have been recon-nneted or had an oo adjustment b rrd on the 7313141 Incprrtlon Alai.:The ecat between n a roil and overlay and full remm3udion&appeomotely 6 t5revs 2811 Proposed Budget-Arterialsand Collectors-Preservation Program ❑1y of Spolane Valley 7011 Pavement Management Plan Update Project Ni. Segment ID 00 Route 1nUm 79 Plan Activity Number of Lanes Pavement Area(5F): Improved DCI Plan Cast 5tormwater Upgrades Suggested Budget** {YjNj P nYearx073 ave yokltrdx 1 I 23 37 35.E BroadwayAv Yardley Pamper AC-Mill and Overlay Art I 96650.60ft 95.51. $254.079.24 I4 41 3674 Broadway Av Park Viirb. A[-mill and pvsdry Ar{ A x13691..11 fk 9345 $292,1158,44 30 55 311,53 Sprague Av Carnahan Fancher AC-Mill and Overlay Art 5 158341.00 ft 97.75 540822137 31 56 3533 Sprague Av rancher Doh, AC-Mill and Overlay Ar7 5 8725804 it 95.73 $224,241.55 37 8O 38.E■App]evray 19 Threrman Park AC-MIII and Overlay Art 7 153784.66 ft 55.45 5395,225.83 35 dee 43.131601AV Pines Stites* AC-Ma and overlay Art 2 _1113_40 it j 95_09 .8 32146111 Pd 115 1639 24th Ay Pines FMErrlonald AC-Mil]&overlay-4:a 2 172E68.00 It 31.05 $3117,027.76 35 130 37135 Carnahan Rd 9th Ind AC-Mil]and Overlay Art 2 63552.008 9718 $1.63,328.64 35 155 3521 Arpgonrre Rd Broadway Mission AC-Min end Clveri•y Art 3 95277.52 ft 95.5 52441 606.23 37 18$ 3651 Vnlrertiry Ptd 16th 14th AC-Min and Overlay Art 5 153204.018 93.02 $393334.28 38 209 3048 yp]reteRd both meOtanalid AC-Mill&Overby-mi 2 VY692.tl3f! 54.78 $121X25-44 39 230 36.75 91ak.;Rd Salem. 24th. AG-Mill&Overby-Col 7 5151EpO#t MUGS $.133,996.75 40 218 37.45 6ul:lrtan Rd Euclid Trent Ac-Mill and overlay Art _ _ _ 3 174731.00 ft 94.2 $419•11513.£7 41 718 37.2$Sullivan Rd Indiana Euclid At-Mill and Overlay Art 6 325711.00 ft 55.34 $837,07.27 42 225 3628 5ulinarr Rd Sprague 46 AC-Mdl Ind Owl iwy Ai 1 4 7731516 R 95.79 $196,659.15 43 338 38.45 Adams Rd 2nd 4th AFC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 23617.00 ft 53.02 $73,546.55 44 239 4219 Adams Rd 5PrdiUe Ind AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 13735.06 ft 9766 $35.350 35 4} 1561 36154 Park Rd Mission Trant AC-Mill and Overlay At 2 11481.46 ft 17.15 5163,1{83.54 40 111Th 37,5 13roa4.919755i Areanne Farr AG-Mill and OVerla.V Art 4 8f438.000 96.9 $221,'15.61 47 1847 36.67 74th Av Univerziry Bo,rdish AC-Mill&Overlay-Col 21.19103240 it 14.95 .11F1,746.44. 40 18as 37.47 Evergreen Rd 24th 32nd AC-MITI end Overby Art 2 69161.00 ft 95.67 $177,743.77 49 1996 3814 14thAv Mon; Sullivan AC-Mill&Overlay-Cal 2 95942.40 k 56.12 $716013114 50 1973 34.64 Park Rd Vallevwav Broadway AC-Midland Overlay Art 2 54692.00 ft 5545 $243.57344 50-tatnl S5,1382,972.41 5808061196 Reoonstruldon Pro4eCI 421 75.3 Sp12>3ue An Atlatrt SkAIivnn AC-Reedrstnier-Arterial 7 2344.19 99.68 $3,146,C37,18 Sub-totaT 53.146,037.15 56,00 Maintenance Probes= _ _ _ Crack Seal andAatchin� = 5175,077840 5560400040 sub-total S175,v2v.09 55159. aOrvu rub-ental Overlay and Prrvemetive 56-1157.47241 SUCH 4VCftfi,Rerdn inl5Gbh and Pf4v11faii C 59.204.409.59 51,506,904_8B _ I$7.104.009.591 I 1 The City ai5ao4ane VallaPs budget naml is$23oIuIGwr ddllmiS.$1.0 rtutli4n drAlars is spent on non PMP related Meiens and inInt±Miat,:ncxdi. The h4hlighted raadw3ti could have been ovyerlaycd in ZU[RT now the-recommended Dmarm-erlt d]Pee 1 recohitmet here are It ronic,tdated roads in2imr3 that ane shownas needing a recansinxtion.Seileral at which have been reoonsirut5ed or had an 01]adjustment based on the 20701M5 irapeet,an Rote:The coot between a mill and wetlay and full recerrcwctloa is approximately 6 times Project N umber3t1:tWO brie WeatbOUrid na-5urf5tine pr1jeet eednpeted iA2011,,Clty may[h2ddeto n544C this p014ttt83 later date. ml�Proposed Pu4j st-Arterials and[alte cmrs-Presenratian Pra1tarn At-a1.r%pl ant V.l4. 16.7.]Pao.mer4 Manacernent Plan update Prpj&t NO- Segit1Bnt ID 00 Route From To Plan Activity NumbQr of Lanes P2Var114iti Area RSF} lrtlprO eIS Plan Cost Suggested Budget** Over/Under Suggested Budget StOnnurater Upgrades MN] Plan Year-1)31 92 4ry Pro 26 2 6:115153,159 ft 87,64 36.73 Mlsskr Av Paris 1RaAa AC-MIAa4+erlav-COI 5177.594.91 50 43 37_43 9roadwaoAu • howdah P+ws AC-Wand Overlay AA 4 117223.09ft 9602 $334,72156 54 d0 74.156 ISroadwa,RV sultan [ANA n AC-Mdtur. overlay.Art 2 4.24a1A0 ft 9258 $17792.33 55 54 37,4 .51888111.AV End Crrehsn AC-1.1311nd Mt Hay Art 5 156020O11ft 97-36 5437,987.50 56 57 3617 $4r18ye An 4aar Thicrnon AC•MAIL and 0+ar4y Art S 41791,00 ft 13509LA0it 95,35 91-84 $1.24,0910.46 1374.174.37 57 El 35.01 Sorarru4 Av ' Herald LfrWarlt5 AC-MilLand Overlay Art 5 $3 31 34.7]AcciewayIL MthmanMien Farr AC-Mill and O.3 FEW*rt 490627,5EfF 5166 525211&44 59 90 323 4ihIw Pines Melkrsald AC-Mill&6rerlay-Col 2 55557.60 Ft 8379 5297,N759 56 91 30.2/ 4th AV Mrflo.old Everrran AC-Mill7F 6rer1ey-Col 285939_00 Lt 33,57 $236384.Q3 61 114 36.5$ 24th Av Bnwdah Pines Ae-Mill&overly-cal 293253rt It 3764 $7911,977A3 60 111 37_24 24th AV Ever'peen 3Mnen AC-Mill&Mably-COI 223282.00 It 3312 $64,48537 69 319 99.44 14th Ad 9 nrwr Adams AC-MlrlSi 0arrlay-Cd 2 I1649L00 ft 86,12 9222.561107 64 122 35.4; 32nd A. BawJlh P• AC-Mi9ard OnrrL!Art 3 783712 r1 R 06,61 9$69,026.1O 65 129. 14 311-61 36.99 tIwpeRd Park Rd Di.hrr4nMlea Six-ague 1.4.0.013001 S¢pkrwav At•Mill$[ erw-C I AC-MOO and Overtop An a 4 81233.00 ft ZAIXI-CPC ft 8925 9661 $1651.5.41 $36,54&7 195 67 156 3543 313011ere Rd 5yrta94'e Broadway AC-M9ard Oveddy An 3 95156.26 ft 9661 $•63666.56 61 170 16.66 h1u4nRd 0ohrrvn Mla &sadway AC-Mldand'verity Art a 96419.088 0661 $264.016$ 62 184 34_74 unkN.5mRA 2443 3210 A[-Ma31.4Overby Art 5 153444.06ft 9453 5423932.81 70 185 32.81 Unlyersity Rd 32r4I Macron?Aka AC-Miind Deirdre Art 567172.3011 92.59 $186,06644 71 2147 37.55 95.0/ McDonald Rd 16th '6ahese AC-Milan70eer1a.f All 2 3:382300 R 92 49096.02 72 231 Evergreen Rd Sprague -MssionConrocli eAC-Miand❑oiil r Art 5 34240191 ft 0632 5943,70753 73 235 3434 Erert7rernRd 15th 7111, AC-Ma and Cver3y Art 2 79160.0.0 It 9404 $219.38100 71 39.9.5 36.52 9owdkh Rd 9th 1601 AC-M31 and Overlay Mt 2 64796.07 A 90.74 9193,m17_22 &JAab1 96.8211r543.07 $116,OOO.C4 i ..men PrnFe I I 75 11 21.42 EyrlldAv Barker End AC' 3-4151351 2 5260E5 0948 9706,769.67 7B _ Sib[NMI $1.503.306.07 SO U] prFailtetrux:Praje4; Clack Seal atd Patching $175,000.{]0 $500.113L00 Su5-30931 5175,000.00 $520,000.0) Serb total C-rc flay end f'rerent.Lire $3,133.643.09 tolalb.stay Remnshuclion and Pre rcrta0o $8,086.94114 31.cnnddttikl IS7.196.94E16/ ` the Uri.of Spokane Valley's budget total is 12.3 million dallen 51.orrausn goners is spent m.non MP re4tetid p r*40s Ned irr.aredare nerds, MA highlighted rpad•r,544 coal I have been overlayed in 2006,now the recarnmerded treatment isa full re each uel The hit Led roadways could hare km.overlased In 2411E now Ike recommended treatment is a full re nsirud there are 17 rernsadated cads 12x103 shat are shown as need 1€a r er_erer uelinn.5everarofwhf3i.l.ave been tete rat rut4ed er had an CO adrintn.eet hated an the 321141M5 inspection Note:The mat between a mil and overlay and full reemuruct'ron is approximately 6timet vrgect Number 55,1- Ii hveellan.d..omfarin4 Prold onrapla.lad in 2011,Crty may them to metro air projer11.o.latardata. 21331 Proposed Budget-Arta malt and Ca lectors-PieseIvatIon Program City orsauaane Valley 7911 Pa woman(Mariam-nun Han t pdat4 Project Nu. • Segment ID L 091 Mute Frain to Mari - Number of Lanes Pavement Area(SF; Improved OC1 Plan Cost Suggested Budget** Over}Under Suggested Budget Sturmwater Upgrades NM) R_ Plan Year 201S 77 Overlay Prrlaeatz S 33.98 Wellesley Av SSIrPRA rtaa AC-MP and Cver4Y Art 219965L95 ft 9969 $31.4954.16 74 28 33.58 Mission AY Ar805ne Harald AC=MA and Overkhr Art 2 t45827,78ft 4337 5437.453.19 79 43 33.E Fireedwlay A9 Farr Herald AC-Mr anckunda1Art 4 21.125,132 ft 59.51 51144016'4X1 BO 44 3336 Qraadwlay Av UniyorliAy Bawd O h AC-MB and r7aeday Art 4 516737.L0R 9643 C350.21L m El 58 343 SatiWa a Av Th:e(man Park AC-MI andCvaraa6 Art S 203569.001t 94. 4..9 9610,762.00 62 fit 3314 Sprague Av Arponn- Farr AC-M I&1.if Cut day Art 5 135114.00 It AL-5 5405342.03 I 5] 52 33 SPrayrreAY Farr Herald AC-MPard(vnlayiut 590216.06ft 915 5270.611249 41 93 3i.2 Sth Av Carnahan Dtday AC•MA and flrnrtale Art 2954979512 97-19 $597.19/1..LB6 25 96 31168thAv D hrna6Mita Felt AC-MalarKICweties Art 2 34994.99 It 92 S1D4.09 M 84 94 54.7$ 8th Av Unere.alty Sakese Iltwordith McDonald AC.Mill and Cv..bY Art AC-Mal 1rdavevtay Art 2 2 9678196 ft 102641.04 ft 93_45 91.66 P70.449.419 5-107.482.00 47 11 0 33.99 lSAV 18th 139 118 93.78 24th Av McDonald 09123 AC•Mill&Overlay•Col 2 45871.44 It 25.73 5137,613.60 R9 gin 120 3532nd Av DMmanMies Wive rift AC-Mill and Cverkev An 2 L9551.9214 92.54 $58.653.96 139 35.42 T den an it 4th 2921 AC-Mill and arc by Art 2 4761190 ft 96_12 $142•43A.90 91 157 35.95 Ancona rod sprnua App4vlray AC-Mill and Overlay Art 9 1a71t)4 ft 97.19 599.663.75 92 '!6G 34.43 Dishmen Him.Bel Sand] iha1p4 At-Mill and-overlay Art 2 109341AQ ft 95.•4 $379,0}30 93 10 3338 MOM ltd 90341.99 Ht790n AC-Mala.%4:Nt-rlew Are a 9525940 f2 g6.12 $2P.5_6711 so 44 196 35.27 GovelishRd Sprague 4th AC-Mill and Overlay Art 2 532n.01)ft 94.04 1159.795,-00 gF 96 143 725 33.79 27.49 Fbwddr Rd Clidunan Mice Sends AC-Mill&Onerlat.-Cal 2 203490412 97.99 $61.047.00 Sullivan Rd Broadway Mission AC-Mill and Cho FEW Art 7 22126M ft 949 $2491511.00 97 257 15.47 Farther Rd Sharp Railroad AC-Mill&Overlay-Col 2 1796L00 ft 80.18 553$97_00 98 1878 54.51 Erwdway At aianld Unit. - Main AC-Mill and Ere rlatr art AC-#lilt&Orerlay•Col 4 2 9749306 ft 17239.00ft 95-74 23.01 5267,494.60 551,717.00 99 1879 3654 Herald Rd 5ara®uc 190 MS 39.79 now164,Rd 32nd S?th AC-Milk and Overlay Art 2119150 57_ 95_74 5153 00 101. 1894 ?6,15 516 Av Wins 15th Vardar 24th AC-MA and Eve ray Art AC-wit andt4ertw Art 746297.06 a ft 9199 =126fr9L on $233.136.013 1422 1197 55.47 Ad,ems Rd 79711.00ft 92.613 503 1911. 33.25 MiratreauPk Indiana Marsfi929 AC-Mli&[Nadel COI 5 45679.96 ft 87.96 $140439,88 5u2-t5551 55-987.54751 S2c3Li195.0I3 Pera4aIDnteae1 atie)eem 104 9 21A2 Eucfd Ac Ed iStl AMP AC-Ratans-truer-Artemi 2 36434 99.68 $515,791172 106 102 406 2106 Madison Rd 40th MAQISCN AC-Raton Mu Arterial 2 107581 99.63 51,4431.741..31 58.06 _ :; 5u4-total 53,227.945.29 rA-11rlLenanar Prolod>= Crack 5oal and Pardrlrg4 $174,006-04 5500.040.04 I $1b 33l S15,09904 $540.90000 SutFtotal Overlay arid Prr sstatr4 $643.89751 Cheery RK4nS4v[Lknand0re'+Mtethr! $4,7455,912.54 $1.304.90030 C$24015.t17 141 ITotal ` Thu City of 5poltna Vallares b.dg.ttnbl is$i3 llnxr dol.rt$LO Ilion dolars en won_on non PMP raiabad prnjartt and enrrudia to mods_ The Neil Ighted roadways co uld have been wertayed in 210.now the reccmmended treatment It a 1u2 reconstruct The highrghcad ro.dw.rr.tovld Nava beenovarLyed in 22i1-rem the racurnrrrerdad r-••,trr.rna is a fr1 rmore-nu-1 Throe are 44.1.4tdated reads Fn lona that art chcwn acrwvdfng2 1111W11.111.14-092,sqt*rat sFwhkei h374 Win rsssesStarted er3ad an 4G a4PFM.Ent bawd an the 7101-0 1MS Insueexioaa trot e:The coo.between a mill and uveday and fun rtepnstr.p lion is tvpruaim tnehr 6 times 2011 Propxed Budget-Arrerie la and Col kctort-Preseryarien Plr4:rans Erb,of Sp:done Valley Perrernent Management Pion update Project No, Seg.Ltet Id OCl Route From To Plan Activity ' Number of tapes Pavemerrt Area(SF) Moproved OCI Plan Cost Suggested Budget" Over/under Suggested Budget 9tarn1water Upgrades TWIN) Plan Vrar 2816 *meter Projecitc 1AC• 187 42 3256 BroadwayAv Vista Argonne hill aniCverLar Art I 1115841.00 ft 15-61 5378,5875E 103 &6 • 34 64 Sprague Av Vlsta Argonne AC-MIA and Overlay Art 9 L401007 1Y5 h 96.39 $51500_63 10g 82 47 Y7 Ppvfenras 91 Vista 4alnra,n M AC-1411 and Iver4y Art 4 139379-15a ft 9533 $4821.571.24 110 AI7 all Ith Ao Thlenrnn Perk .AG -Ma .pverlpy-col 2 5979900-Ft &6,11 5222905-76 111 141 3L41 MA..A. McDonald lwrrawn AC•Met and Credal'Art 2 740 =0 ft 92_58 S742052-0.1 112 117 31.652IthPar Blake Evergreen AC-Mal&Overly-Col 211335 -961 E534 5114,et5-50 113 132) 3433 Reuther Rd Sharp Trent AC-MIA and Overlay Art 4 1112504-210 ft MI5 $422212.96 114 155 33-57 DilfenanMCand 4011. Sank AC-MN and Qvellad Art 1 79X1,00 ft 9635 :215.976.6, 115 157 323809dvnunhe lea Rd Thome End AC-Mal end Cart day Art- 257559,00ft 9555 $136,49116 us 127 3094 Moll Rd 5th 15th AC-Mg&Crum day-Col 2 locaas.0oft Mar 5346.446.72 117 795 3206 Bondi*.Rd trtlr 5th AC-Mal auir everkr Orr! 2 5241530 ft 15.7 S1t9331196 5177.490.96 — ill 708 5213 MON:mallRd dth $th At-Mal and(verlay Art 2 53904.1O t1 92 1.1.9 241 3117 McDonald Ad alto kith A&-MS rtrd Overlay Art a serJazue ft at. 2 $J47,7.s-1$ 1.20 211 34.561ako Rd Taal. 5R.27 AC•MR&919 day•r-ot 213467.00 it 16.34 $114.97T.18 121 222 312 Sullivan Rd Sprague Ernsdrwy_ AC-MS and Overlay Art 7216330.09 ft 91.21 579510730 122 1170 33.213 Park Rd Sroedway Sorbaw 1.rl.ton 4th AC-Mal and Overlay Art A{•Mal ard0vsda, Ar1 2 9616166 ft P7-19 5305726.64 123 1892 3156 MIPanS94Ad 2 59117.60 ft Si. $122.747. Sulrelral 31,511% 180700.00 ltn!Wnfitr :1106 Mlle= - - 124 1967 2641 ErrridA. SwIrwarr. .1.larittt3 AC•Fie cevmtlrct-Arterial 2 715343 99..35 _L1,055,203.2E1 125 215 17.15 Program-&I Wallalay Crown. AC-RVmmtrrrt-Medal 2 32468 54.8$ 126 Sub-46Ii1 S4.493.315.92 5100 ---- 5 s dMOnlce- Proton (ark Seal and Petthin6 Sub-tet97l $135566.66 $175.000.312 everca*1I 5500.03010 Sub-total overtly and Pnerentrere $3}9331196 Toni Overlay,Recome. i0n .dPrcrcnattee 59095,727.66 $1,300.000.00 15+.755.727.511 I _ • Thu City of Spokane Val9ayt budget total s$.9 rmfiion&Pars.41.0 million dolma is spent on non 5515 related project'end Immediate needs The 5031501511 mat%M.ebuld 55.. Mee 0w5Ik 5diT 2W05.now the rtxamhtihnaee rrNtmcnti3 a hull reco nstruel The highlighted roadways could has. been ovedeyedin 201i.now the retomrnerded MS!trnere ice fug reoonu4ucl Thole are17[A *ousted roadsin 1003 that We ihbwn as needirte a tetbia:Vnttib&Sacral el which have been reooruburted or Jordan GEC 2 dj. treent bared on n3g781611.1.2 irjpocdlsn NOW.The cast between a all 3rdwerfa7andfull owns conkapproalrnatelyStknas 2011 Pnapmed Budget,Arterina and Corlenurs-Prow.ruaeion Program City nF 50013 Ire Nancy 7011 Pavement Managenxne Plan Update Project NQ. 5egmerkt : ID OU Rail[e Fro n Yo Plan Activity Numbei of Lanes Pair2rYtpnt Area If !rum Dyed OCI Plan Cost Suggested Budget'• Uver/Urjder Suggested Budget Storrntrater Upgrades[Y/N! Plan Year 2017 Omit.y Ptutees: 127 12 3272 Mentitomery or Wilbur Perses Ac-Mi and o.edey Art 7 93948,10ft 96.41 S129_32945 120 19 311 Indiana Ay Montgomery Mlrabeau AC•ME and Oveay Art 5246122911t 96A1 $972,930.19 139 27 1013 Ma.h,nAr ver. ,a-Ear, Ad-taiJI&Chroday-Cal 2 79G2a,74R 17.90 $277.78545 130 59 31,56 53,oe A. Pack Yfsta _ P.C-MPandOverlay Art 5160308.40 It 96.09 $501.072.00 131 70 1346 5tlmpweAv %Evan Conker AC-MI and Overlay Art 5 122113.012 Ft 942 $664,14$.10 232 72 5276 4prave Aor Flare [ar{act• AC-MI and Overby Art S 11663040 it 47.19 $100-yA.00 120 78 83.11 S p r a g u e A v Barbee k i g d p s AC-N M A citreous-C I 2 53064041t 8'357 25,7110.00 134 135 1.259 itirmin Rd 0 . 1y Mssion AC-MA&Overlay-Col 2 155431/10 ft 00.12 $299.933.00 135 199 3321 Md2drmi0Rd 5012 Cm Broadway 52ut AC-MI ftld 035359 Art: AC-Ma and OvrdaY Fat 4 127632,008 96.61 $445,71290 129 204' 57.5 Plewx i d 24th 2 9664100 ft 53.74 53152L0_50 137 217 33.17 64&323 lid 0011 _ Wull mi AC•Mal arnd Overlay Art 4 77212110 ft 9720 5770 756.50 136 227, 3329 Sorrow Rd 24th End AC-M2 and CMtt9ay Art 3 382S03513 95-78 530.87105 139 2?B 3149 EveryreenRd I90W LIFF Indies AC.Mdl.ndarr...1. A.rt 072175,44 t 9046 $2S8,11$A0 1412 144 11,70 ntrr.Rd Tram Welles$sl. AC-M.8 a+4O€eday Art 2 3l35.76 ft 9503 3i.ixe75.16 1,11 1M67 33934th AY End Cadet- AC-WI acrd Ove.Lv Rrt 21X79730 rt 9637 5 ,,789.50 Ill 1277 Sint tier 1d ad End Broodway 3-C-MR 8.Cea.by•Gar 2 4'496240 ft 37.24 $1S7.352.Q0 103 1&43 37 S 4th Au Unirerslry 9Scwdlsh AC-Ma a.0ve1ly-Col 2 ROW-0 ft 25.95 3247 41#50 144 1984 3L7 4th AV 504MiSh Ma. AC•Mall$.r'vorUY-IAI 7.641021b,W ft 225.31 $297.46750 5r,trlod l 55678.437-15 ..■ ...40 Reconstruction Projects: 145 1901 29,21 Euclid At Marietta flora AC-Reconstruct-Artarlet z 06P3d2 99.E $1,332,90701 1•6 216 25.03 Flora ad Euclid Wad SAC-Rent MVUet-Arm dac 7 19249 93,08 3244.784.64 147 1905 31.73 5,21128 Rd Fill AC•Rap.:thud•Arterial 2 24172 9988 $391$42130 14.6 Stheu01J 52,194.675.42 93.00 srai ntcnattee FMaje[trr - Q.cf 5i.I 3rd Ferchi.a $135,044.46 $500,060.00 - - -•-- _ $121.n r.l $125.000.02 $540.000.40 Sutrt.3l 6rerby and P.wuntative 8,n59,417,15 TolhdC.rer13y,tie.o-nytr r0t.andPreventall a 58,205.119.97 $1.343.006.66 (56.908.176.371 The dine ar4 423..Vannes 4radeet total Es 62.3 rnlllrq..ddla.s,514 m11msdollarsorlhe 523 rn lke is spar( n PMP .Ltctl prujerts such pcd.hulc repairs,patchurg,srnElc(ant marlays and other immediate nerds as they arise, The h'iph8 hied roadways card have been orerlayed in 2008,noui the remmmeodad treatrr ant is u fall racomntrt The hehlighto d rnadvaa}a coed haw.lwrn ev-.1 y d In 2111:now the 1P40 amended treatment is a full reeasramla-t 71,n aaro17torral r.o droadsin244$Isratare:hownasrresdoaamoansrxot-tion.Sn•cratofwhichhaysbarnteccrstruewdcrhadanOCfadjustment basedanthe7614WMSinspec ion Note:Iha cart batmen:,mill'and ove dry end full rotonedvrtian fs approzirna1e7 Climes 21411 Praprsd Bud Ri Art•naLs and CG11,43 er5 M.-mil.Pavans illy of ii.xkanc Tacy 741 Paurrnrca hLnagrrrtethi Fyn 11pd5ir PrrVIICS No- Segm&rrt 14 Oa Raute Frain 1,a Plan Activity. IJurrrller of Ianei P'dalrierrt Area(SF) Ienproutd OQ Plan Cost 5vgge€4ed (3 udgetaa Ov rJUnder Suggested Budget 5'1Or7RWit61r Upgrades NM ran rear ktamseeruralerr Projaa>: Ira 1273.77 ipra5w•AV Fsnirnn Ad sin c AL-ea-Ancaral4'tn..l 7 231919 99.1$ $3}75,77398 51 SS 75.3 Spri6+1 742 Mardi 5,112703 AG-IRO-Eft svua-Meta l 7 291429 94.69 $3,1•6,03718 33 13 21.12 fudld3. 67ftICr krd •C-Wens-Duct-primal 2 52iPii 99,5S. 5795,769.67 75 164 9 _ 2443 kt1f4121 3d Epa 5adnif• AC-HEccrostamt-kinlal 2 32434 94.63 $515,790,8 LDS 706 11+1 19133 2204 2241 Mirisol Rd fpar3d Ar 1091 13& r Mr�L1342H eaYarehts nG-P.ermswa•Nnn'iil AC-M^.pa,stnlft-33113531 ? 2 17758I NUM 49.44 94.M3 SLAlia7a1.31 5/355,min 22 - 115 337 17.15 - - Rd - • awn AC-Rlaenstruet-Analrl 2 37840 9418 1 .152 116 145 1903 23719uild As Marietta Ffora AC-P.ro:nsh=-Arterial 7 99325 44.66 $1,332,907.3L 145 :AA 2E03 ilpra RA Eodd Euclid A[-xnalyhps.504 1.4 7 141242 93.64 €444.724441 147 1906 Min 2473 iuLran Rd Frd Arcratoroct--saradal 7 29177 94.92 516-tats) 'kl....l:'• 517-036,4175.66 •• Thr OL•9f Spokane Viteys.bu*"lord 6523 re iIondoaui 512 million do11413 el dm 523 malt.,u bprro OM PIMP related projamas& pot hakrrpan,pa[dhu4r emyla hnr awriayc ardnlhrr tmrntdotrnttds ortlhtysrtst Fat Iis3Ti1Med/01431344 read hair heed olArelaidd W Mikt,nbw the reosrnmended'Ireatnrra.s31,111 rec.lima The Mel lighted reed yezia could hen been em4kod Ifl 7011,nnvriin reca-Tor deg oar:melt b a lull rteortrtrul There art 17 aar.xhNur,J i wrh Ir.2886 J.(ai a diurra as nerdiik a ie1.raauewn.srunal of wlnnh tae Lem renonserunted or had un oo adp strnrn t hisard an dri 2930 1bA5 htyeaton Nat e:he cost Between a mil and aueday and full remnstruadon Is appnm4nat3y 1LtLnc Local Access (residential) Projects City of Spokane Valley 2011 Overall Condition Index Local Streets r9. -,• • •'A - ;- • :I.& . . _ •flgt V ='■ , . .. . ...T.,, . .. .•-• •14. i • ...,. al...ler • •• i • .1.--1 •1--. .. . - • . „ I. !' .. • • " 77... '' -'1.,.'',. --•?-.,: ,_...C. .- 1 ,--lb Y■1 ?'..r: • .•_.-■.. : - .-4- -,:,-.1. 1 It'll 11-; .-,,..--■.•,.-..-- ,- ......I. ' --'• L- :", .■■• ., ._. ''—'4'.--"•- •:,; - 1 Ea—r .....i.. • *':••• ' . ._,......,, -,.., December 07 2011 T-4.51 -•- i• -• ' • Legend ve rail Lnndrtkrnpndz 1- o(F4Aiell • 31-50 Madam la Pax) El -1 Melc 3lElmErIvEIC'Ehrl_T Local Streets City of Spokane Volley 2012 - 2017 Preservation Projects Mop Coombs:7,3011 r • -• = F - '"— rs F . r — 4- N- M- • I R jr is - L yE is. 74151 .h.onn Z4v u- Mmwna n o ireeoweers —moo.a. —�o•.•r Y41i Inalmenn 2'17lhom ��...r .•••.,... YIIr Rr.v.i eh.lV''Eimma d.V ar#r#R 0•1 POAP.SP05YIf Ii WI ZI$$I$rY Vndlirb. 2931 Pruprasd 20d®c1•Wad Acatss{14C51dc a4 Raid:-Pre croCran Prawn P1veSpnkarl oiliEl7 3711 Prvemen!Management Flan Update Project Igo, Segment ID OCI Route From To Flan ACllvity Number M Larl, revemedf AT a(SE) lnlprOved CC] Plan Cost Suggested Budget*. Over/Under Suggested 6udpet Stvrmwater Upgrades fY/FJ) L....1:.p:. • AG-AS Leml 0.lertry 2 33400.00 k* 90.18 .916.466.0u - - AG-AG Lamm Ore 2 53129A ft. 96.18 5196.724.7E =Inig=M1117r1Trin AC-AC L I Overay 775763 L►6E1` V.1d 571.16537 - =,• Marlin 17 Emu IKAYR Manion AC-AC Lar31 Dreary 256£dO ft` 40.1E $112.3619 - - ina Al;•AC Lan!Overlay 2 141122041/ 4419 5211,081A2 s {ymero9Ct End AC-AC L0t314rerlay 2 1542.91 fta 90 ! •.10.93 7 Lath A. Houk End AC•AC Local Overlay 2 9536.48 ft, 1443I 51 80730 8 397 MrE1127MCZEZ AC-AC 1x31&moms+ 2 10125.20 FO 93.1E 315 9 !SS ME .. Can nlar+d AC-AC Lq[al Orertnv 2 18d49M R` 'RUM 537,74197 16 1067 End AC AC Laval 9•2 2 =OA*ft, 73 1 $71201.21 1 440 ® Moab-7mcrr D. Drummond AC-AC Loud Gelliy 2 MUM Fe 96.Y1 $7- 71/17 12 801 IMMEI R:rcrskle A., HutclI 57.1 AC•P.0 Luu.l O... 2 36•72.3.311P S].7? 2 ••: -73 33 1176 =021Z1Z1=1117 Rd. AC•AC LnoI C.erlay 2 4442537 #5.47 -588,801,74 14 iVLi 3r S8 rart. 21 AC•AC Loot• 2 531178-12151' 9059 107.103.76 15 426 AC•AC Loot Overlay t 77594-10-ft= 97.76 575.60665 MI: MI=Mn I1Dlyd Cr 39111 7535 AL-AC 1*131❑41118- 7 12/5429111• 9119 5276,19-7.62 • MTMIRidImola CT Vim Cris 1=1= AL-Ac Ler3L❑,erlav 244404.80 ft= 90.18 583.5E735 AG-AC t7+Al Orr'.[v 2 56E930 W 74.1.9 07.9.21151 39 928 jjjjjj 1 54111.4 Rd :7777111 MI5 AC-M LCCSrG'Cl17 2 215565-2011` 8897 29073E 20 773 33:13 M77WI5 AV Oberlin IHrreMate AC-AG L7•[4vrrn 215444.00 Re 71.37 $34,17533 21 1752 33.13 FOCI End 35th AC•A ICI• 2 746340 ft' 7997 $-ta51 37 - 23 345 MZE112= 21M1== 'mama AC-RC Local Ow - 2 7377.00 ft' 73.12 534.511.08 7$ 1186 . . ETI AC-Art Long Overlay 2L1a10,Lnfe 111.97 510,771x40 24 MI=MIEI fldsoh 171 9arkPr ..• AC-AL Lnedlamlay 2 402199-20 1st 40-18 514,12331 2-5 =MI 8.11.34d Are r. ••n E AC•AC Local Oxena4 2 ]147436 rt• 75.12 - 11139E 27 MI:1=2EI 6utllrir AC-AC LLCM Overlay 2 r.6s1&zafe 90.38 213 '59011 77 1TR9M1 79th Ar Crtftwend AC-AC Lcl1I 4.ctlav 2 13520.94 h# 71.27 526.911E0 29 586 =MI I:=15=11 Ool•wroud AC-AC LOWrortr• 23454392 Ir 30.38 `317157.433 79 7th jjjjjjjj®111iu,e Rd RrLN : . AC-AC 1041 C79 - 3 20386.45 to 01.27 2ag1L23115 30 1143 ® 19th CS polkf . End AC-AE Lbei1 0-re 2 5000.47 ft` 9L74 521,144A2 21 1777 ® EMZWEM IR116rrt AC-AC Loot 0-... y 3 99925361[* 9171 $133,013-79 32 1214 Laren AC AC 1flo10re-rbv 2 7237&88 its 94,19 554,5227 33 673 =MI Ualkywav Au Fvsturn Oyer AC-AC Lflcara,e -. 21277392 Ft 94,38 52'1,323-19 34 IMIEE1==j1 Pk...R1 14741 74th AC-AC Lott• 3 1 m748b4 ft, 9018 $214,42260 35 nijjjjjjj 1 Wwdru17Pd M75-:• End A5-ASL.noI0xerlav 7 22978.4lft` 94.13 51534739 36 s.uk81 Misav9 End AC-Ali Lout Overlay 2165074615 758.4'7 532242-73 37 End AC-AfLOm1 OyaI • 730014.72 ft, 70,54 539,575.29 38 r1l i1 1L^.u....Yf-�U1 -i.. -LIL L,M End AC AC Loral Overlay P 18502.74W 94.1.9 535/17339 39 IMO.M381 - 0nY4er AC-AC Loh O,erkr; 24®10,1)0 ft" 9018 39,913_27 441 5357 Tlnherlam Ci 7417, Er d RC-AC Local 51711,9 2 •.•A3 ft1 74.19 $7_550173 9th-lnld S2A98 915-17 41 1953 2471 At-0rbansen b17-Le.mal 2 14337625 17.76 51f20.756.44 Soh.rzt al 1135.3321.47 . .. Q'MS.Slalindrae7hire •..••, , .. S78-men1 $807,40046 Sub-37711 Nertay and Prrventrl'IU $4915,935+17 FMa P1135174 77 '7J ill;111eientalree 54.1395,293_91 lanes:Late 71771 bc!wscn a mill imd avcrlry ink full raaananadkI;2 777411 mitely 6 wars 2011 P.np3 11141 4.1-14111 X14134 4N trelen Ij 146],45-414Ck2Ylren Mow?, Orr a tpakaneW3ey 2011 maalalrrl Plan u0404 Project Fro. Se-pleat ID . I OICI gotau E}C711 To Plan Aetivity Number of Lanes Pavement Alta{SF} Improved od Plan Cast Suggested Budget"' over under Suggested budget 5tuarrrrater Upgradl>S 1786 ._ 9ian?ea r7O13 Ored7y 15304.2 r 42 419 1758 32241 25.X7 Adam Ar _ 19311.110. Ylee6Iun Fn! AC-AC leraI Vr eir I he-4)e Lo.111143.347 2 3.796I11410 33.11 5311,13124 516171535 _ 43 6154d3E lodetra 3 743/9A51t' 69.6! 44 1575 3334 27th A. Mc E.ir6rttn AC-AC Loa 55reday 2 S3364011" 91.24 5114.279X4 45 1541 2.1722r4 s E.aeQIa9 0Oir AC:-AC Lee IOverlay 21213L2014 2121 627,22268 46 2799 54,11 ISEh Ar 9.l26ew fan c150 42-ACL t2IO3113112r 2 4833606 h' 19.$8 S103.21630 97 14.151 1431 +,-_n fed 1663 24113 4.G-A[1oa18rv144. 2123.e6300 7' 8989 322731630 48 T3 141 .91516156 1 WFISUI 6r8 AC-AC 1.4041039647 15E80.12fe 94.44 6.12.5422.6 44 164 34_t Ck4an hd 24th _ slnd k[- 4.164 IUrrlfr - - 2 17455$0015' 45.45 616;7§9.44 Sp 1771 3455 3rd 7.,l End A[.At boor 61v12 y 2 1646iil6It SRAM 522346_00 51 551 34556GeMerd St Edtsd End AC-ACLdhrlMenlo. 215955_28 It 63.58 534,325-18 57 1777 65 SA rrria Fnd Ind AC-At bra-al ri rrlay 2 1060400 le 84.171 W.:N7110 53 fi37 34_55 gulp AU Ra12-oad Ya52097 AG.AC Imi 8u4hr 3141519411' 89159 4ranE4 54 1766 3465 264h 2+__ 3Ypgr•,S #527 17-34754w0519 fbY 2 25612.11143 9014 557-215.85 55 4142 34.71 Roth Palle Cr 16h End AG-AC LaraI OVWY 2`'`0=0043 11.24 311$414.90 55 2744 3463 5514 A. 044s WRIC4 AC-AC ta7rnK r r 1'.27.11.9413 mat 513.37.43. 57 3.333 35-02 19131144123e Of 112411 2744 AC.•Al.La4-JLAIN12 .47 15829197le 92.84. _$__ __1.1 52+1.44L22 S9 617 2631 Y0919AU MI6 YCdst AC-AC 1aa14YIr8y 2 2+I77G]619h 4827 59 7.62J2 36 AIM Ar 1111.97349 599494 AC'AL Iet36u4ter 7:462111404' 5978 5111391454 68 990` 253 M6.r Oar Pines Colin. AC•d4.Lad 031557 2 166331644. 9637 536.77696 . 61 62 1545, 11179 35,13 35.81 941..,94 384944 210_ _ _ 41416143 'EM AC-AC 44ea1 51rnLrr 2 2ga0-30 OP 5754&8843 4616 9124 563.313.92 53.1.3,861.72 Z341313303 44-4C Leal Overlay 2 63 2327 SCAB 131h 4s Sod W1=dlrrh AG-At COwl&M144' 2 0311.40 Rt 4124 314.216.66 61 678 111.25Iata4n1W SPlareld 950.3971 AC-AClaulererlay 2 8378.06 re 89,86 _ $15 550 Ora 1955 25.26 rkrce Ad 2444 27"d AG-A4 WSaf4vPlar 2194636.76 ft' 79-711 5227.521.74 6 6 584 36312.b'd.ra FM Joel AC-At led 8rrby AC•AC 12018hru* #11741488 2 h' 2173526 it' 99.99 85.86 $39,195.64 546.73818 67 636 36.49 6a5wd.lw Howe 14iKian 571 114 36.62 1744!,4. 11114 3145 AC-6_L 16•105r4br 7 11779L1140 61.4 $36,175.5+6 81 1751 3633 dl4nn Gt End 1534. 44.441ad10.4121. 2 145 1.8846' 16198 374355190 751 3773 37.8 4016 Au 4144114111 End -4 9 41 5 44 47 9 7 7 1 94 2 24167.369 9039 •54_35734 21 1231 37.121101774 01 61176111 3614 AC-AC LAM On/lay 211565131it' 94.19 54LL107.2o suh.rvul 54-08 >a.oenm,dree/4430ko 72 675 11.36 34143941.+11-05-Sii a EMI 3119934 4C-156#2551.11%elifie-lbt51 '2 4686 1115 3-L42 'I3 924 14.�whip�ple Rd 4744 h41Fl AC-Recanr9'u 5'40947404 1 941X,69 1494 5969631711 741 592 14.OS MaeleTTa Ar I4r5411.n rdnm6orn.ry - AC.Rauonoru 5607446-1 1 151611 124)11 247531.112 75 17L5 7171 Sonora nr 1X.1, End AC.Remndrur04o4nd 2 1571123 71.1 317813.4116 75 7595 1113271617 3100C}s15 End At=-156115,051J5h095i7037 7 12515 785 777194372 4117 311.1111d'n 29w11,9"014(10.4217ne 64150031514n, Fnl M211 9-51D.1 r31 7 25751 )7794 2L5 59746 78 1866 215 462111.3 Was hWiew At44e534124h214024bd 2 3612216 4569111.10E2 74 664 74.47 612.13383e Pod MdnAtansey 715[6045 2413.010411176.12602-44436 2 34121.3 7947 401936.361 - Setrtanl 51,859,055415 39.130 PY91ert. _ - LTA&sea ant meting SSw,wuau Sour 54•161,641 5578.18597 5 1,-42231[ww7sys nd 9rwu.nrx6e $2,7+6.144.73 T001 4wa745 itroa,r0 naio.,and PrewM•lire 54.834,512.59 M I&Tl4e OO454444men 2., 241d 0.9•14 srd1u%,*tow.4euelion a 41p.m:6115.E66e 6 Eimer 2011 Framod&>dact Laca-Atecst 54kz,drnaa2 Rva:1s-Pr1Ler3It n PntSram 1722 of 5pArn 1 7 aSrr 2011 Pavorrwrll Managvlr5nt PI1.1 Update Project No. Segment ItC ¢2.1 Pone Fn ni To Plan Artivity Number of Lanes Pavement Area(SSFI Improved 00 Plan Cost 5175pgested Sudget"" Over/Under Suggested Budget 5torrnw4tur Upgrades 2.Y/N] 1.1)nYew 2011 &Jam napalm 86 1757 33.47 6atrs Pd End 3721 AC•AC Lov.t a rdoy 7 64533.90 81 54.5$ 51517,311,29 51 1726 339 3011 Ay Unive•co v Freer AC-AC Lanl Marla 2 4955390 le 90.41 5115.4S8.63 92 7770 29:24MbnrrRd Sth 7h AC-ACLoc_Id.crbIr 227321904' 98.58 5474t57,93 8$ E1 3432 Lee1 Rd gw3xyt End AC-AC Loral O.eriar 2 3894L52 le 9044 51:7,510,24 SE 1.2-4.5 3456lfrsq rld 3314 AC-AC land O.erNy 77-181.6611` 94.48 517.197.73 85 1930 34.81.3144a _ VelO0r EnA AC-AC l0 4 r r].prtxy 2 1704440}N REST 541,890.20 El 456 34.51 STAIto Bruns Lndl • AC-ACLoasl 4.eOw_ AC-AC Lewd 0.1-12y 2 • 2470120 IV td551.65le 49.5* •3.54 537,55396 535,565.11 47 726 3S1 WbnrRd Mlsdon rr,d AR 9477 353 Mak Ar Bart Aden¢ AC-At Lao!dariay t 47336.37 It 52.37 $110,060.63 89 1459 393?213i kw Unhresky Sktprrorth AC-AC Lod Oterlay 279624.0615' 99.54 $155,5x3-92 96 C07 25.44 Drummond St Mang ornery.' Martin A0.-AC Loed Overlay 237170.40 h' 9058 556•840.03 91 935 35.45 Maln A4 Pines McDonald AC-ACloeal O41rmy 2 03960A4 It' 8837 143,7792 92 110 35.52 lux Ed Ssraavc :St AC-AC L441 INN dire 29627.0612 88•07 52203221 to 596 95.59 Grasp Cl. End 7.245 AC-AC Loa'L257rkl. 3 11704.09 ft' 10.55 537 61.90 74I 1141 30•37F 1artn E4 151h nor-kv 554414 AC-ACLdC VWkl7o 2 15.2111']Its 91 F9 7796 05 1116 3611 Houk Rd 4th Ind AC-AC Loci O.erYy 226303-905' 8177 981,18-79 96 403 3.612 Hank]ny Ad Marla 911ekert AC-AC L3441 CherM4 216516-90 IF 8956 $41.445-11 47 821 3023 118u5 Fik 047140 Mbwon AC-AC ma/medal., 7 37231801V 86..07 559.15295 96 5770 3[.39 Well!41 2374_ _ End AC-AC Lon,'r edgy 257261.4)615' 90.46 011320532 99 336. 3:6.54.Eh1n Rd Shannon Is AC•AC load it eday AC AC Loa Ovthay 2 2 16223.22 IN 144826015' 9L28 9637 5219.35-1f $24,30656 100 344-6 36.69 24th Av Fad Dishtom Mk:. 164 361 MS 1ndam k r HutchInfort ArBonat AC•At loud ChM by 1 0/2640.14: 57,47 517.841.95 102 1292 9714 iknteiy(t Solli,an EA AC•AC Lrrsai C..e.Lai 214484.004' 51-79 $47.77143 103 1901 37.W 1.70110 AN U0.ets9y Skipvntrdi AC-AC Local Overlay 1 61194.104' 4857 $19.137021 LW LOS 486 4922 _3I.e3474.m)t AU 57.4710 Air ihiorraan Union pridlay Palm AC-AC 11x41 Ove'1ay At.AC teal Orrwiay 223852.404' 236310.4014' 94,44 $54-9545.99 WA, 585,767.30 tp6 1166 -_37.52 Pro5rcRd SPnww 404 AC-AC Loral Osoi Y 2 44356.6111' 9176 553 43 L 4 7 E B B 37.57 Sharp Av Fonde-r Front alik. 51)70230 Th rmgn I14ut AC-AC 1.11137 Overlay__ 2 76034.4611' 9314 $1124.5815 Log 7500 3796 coin:Rd AC•AC Loma Ovo.Htr 2 19365.E211' 88•._97 45,131.81 'S01.9.bLII 109 584 3719 VeNa g1- Cohan C.our11540 AC-AC Lml ilueLW p 36422.4114* 473.745 210 1297 37.77 4in Rd 811 Archery Sc-AC Loral 4ve-rr 2 5&5198 4' 8917 “316320:4 ill 1662 37.81 VBIjiia Rd 2945 3494 AC•AC Latal 0rertry 2 40227.50 h' WAS 393.13611 112 1695 3$01 Sk1uHw _ Erd AC-40 1.4441 pvedly 2 20210.509' 5:149 $473541.55 ti1 017 =IA 1.tarwnl Av Pim, Houk 4r-ArI'-l tlowriay 1 21135.41F Ile 1&4T $55.235.67 114 1546 9654 S4thAr N,rnrir Vlr3n4 AC•AC10,01 Overt& 27307.047. 89.9,7 515.79231 S1-,41434 52•49.1007134 sue 515 506 9•14 moing4etkery CJ1-00-58 mo-ntp7Mery [M AfaOecbnitnxt ibis-Local _2 4520 0b1 535157.1 116 454 20-E96rIl59POrt AV 5x14 =Lw AC-Rf3Onitr6nlian-18111F 2 51014 21.69 60551/'47 017 1100 32Bost led 2481 32nd AC-Reconstruct lon-Local 7 _ 5047804 41014 22 22.94 617698•8344) 116 MO 2.2_06 33rd Ar Pierre Woodward Ae4coomstrucilonanol I 462781.85 51144t4a1 57.229.199.21 541.110 liAlelliailkeirdikc _ Crack Seal and Pak>3nrng S b-lu l ¢540,840.041 7500.896.01 50,40 504-let/0119142 a ltd Areuhtlathrt 22,999.14331 Toed0ow*,nemnothrom ra71Pr9495r595 $4,B221,311105 r r . Mott.The.earl betvlet9 a mdl and overlay and 140 room d:ruetIon Is sJ9roximotely 6 titers 71711 Propn4 Budget-And Adana pResilenlidh Road•Parkt•nninin 1161944 5157 of Spokane Vullef 2511Taenrerl VIAmernent Praa Update Pre]C[t ND. Sagrncnt Its OCI Route Imam o Plan A.tGnty NtEmber of Lanes PSvernent Area IS F) Frepr red MI Plan Cost Succested ItAet" Over/Under 5ugzested Budget STorrnmater Upgrades{Y)Nj Plpo1W 2011 irliettreProjecer Il 119 1341 34,06171E Au 44..0.60 uniuerarry AC-AC Lace Cherbe 2 61 1)59 he 90..40 $759,83590 120 162 3459 21#At End CT Lon AC-AC LconaiChcaley 2 37424191W 70.11 5244.536_? 171 158 5491 tlblx Rd 19th Same Art-AG Lm11 Owerge 258361.48 7 f1' 767601877 84.54 0954 9.215.44341 917.117.46 122 1370 35 Make Rd 12th 19th A4--ACL4sw10urrlas 173 1957 3531 Peru.3t 3214d 37th AC-AC LaalNerla5 243835.4011` 92.8 5110128.3 134 1372 35.13 Kellar ltd 50.1)686 Stmt. AC-AC L..:41 c.,,,L,y 7 7700.29 re 69-67 5456.435.6;5 125 1597 15.791310 Ar ■a41li1 Elwyn AL-AC Lop 1.l,y 2 3318430 re 9[21 $18.31104 126 MS 15,19 1.111M71 FM 1505 1519 AC,AC[MI U,erty 2 1)35.7.059 6174 $?6.563.97 127 1034 54.19137Ar Cashanun Miea WIIkt. AC-ACLam!Overlay 216944169° 8437 36,44 112 1736 55.26 Gillis Rd 34th 38th AC-AC Local Overlay 2 171040 9 89.27 $42,017,46 129 1644 3136 2711,At 2719 74111714 AC-AC Lau!overlay 2 5527363 M 9218 5114236.74 190 1719 35.57 3649351 Bat., Fed AC-AC two!overlay 2 31945.179' 40.10 5.132M17.AS. 131 1751 35.55 F51151 3519 3719 AC-AUCLoa]Overlor 2 7X-22fklA 10 40.10 546.28220 182 553 2.531 CtmHnnd Ar vtla/e 06414.461 AC-AC Local OverluC AC-AC Local Overlay 2 13512.714t 9127 585.1 ,58 15m 1182 35..412141Arr Mntrru End 7115117.62.lA 03.137 53&09082 134 1911 11.66 Mown CL lath End AC-AC Luca)0narlua 3 266940 ht 9124 174331 135 1754 36.14 r31tr ed 32nd 341E AC-AC Lnol0.erior 220246301c 90.18 $50.8170.0 736 953 36,1791almRd SPrasys Ya4Itwvr AC-ACEacalG.erlar 343453-41' 13.07 51.06.746,17 138 714 34.13 147n Au End E•c1>pccn AC AGLuw4O,erlar 294027,801t 88.07 595,491.86 198 1498 34.3735357 Ay Vcrcltr M[04 nold AC-AC Lnc4 Overby 256720.141 88.57 $142.38830 179 1526 sass 1Luwc 51. 1455 1647, AC•AC L,.:di YLYL 2 2#150.41',IL' 97.1$ $$5.186 911 1411 1341 5699 nth AV . _ inia _ 9 ..J wn Mae ACT .51 Al tocalO.eriay 2 0142.011 8167 520.136,12 141 Ill 29.574 5tnto AV Pines AC Weal O.tI 1Y 2 741112_16111. 87.74• 550.557.28 147 1363 2.12.76 1.111 C7 Maims [154 AC-AC Laral 046161 24735.70711 89,58 5111181.85 143 7207 3E,194111199711111 RA 7310 1514 AC-AC L4ca19171515 139949141' 9476 164648125 141 I571 36.87 Gntur7Q End 22nd AC-AC tad Onrn,by 21259109R' 9611 $31,626.00 145 1956 5712 Van 5.51rt&Rd 33,1 Ltd AC,AC 111.410.4710 233494170$' 9281 5646E394 146 555 37_77 1.66.,11 Mr Vekm 1 4.1 4, AC-AL inn l Chuang 7 331 20 4t 0' 9518 $61,1'2401 Las 667 5719 [Aaron Rd ereed,ar 11610.1 AC-ACbac*Os'day 2861290ft. T 813127 S7i,191_68 1.141 3517 32.15 FJLl led M. 4n 11691 AL-n1;Let.gil 41.1 risy 1 14954.1910' 91.75 Sax:+r t ry L41 969 57.19 go-Lac 5d 594410.19 main AC-AC Led 5a'+=e5V 1 33721.0011' 40117 579.33..5 L513 1711 17.3 Needham Cr Tlnberbnc Cod AC-AC Loon Overlay 217625.2011' 8917 $44,74425 L55 91.3 371711outRd 5pragte Alan AC-ACLoralpynLsy 318&14.0014' 11&47 $472:844 Sub-total 52.95598.97 So 3o A coo natrunion proiedi LL2 313D YA69" 51Ar Ern1 lantern ACltecwulruciionaLnml 2 4`34336 Thsa 9647)653472 153 1923 3531 Balfour Rd ]pt a Mm AC-tecunaruction.l oal 1 =712 2.61 24972'09021 LS4 350 2429 /Sera:mkt End Sullivan A09nt,, tructinmlm1 2 134216 24.02 511895.772 151 1594 3424 {onlin O. 22,54 End AC me iod-1xel 2 71700, 24.11 87452 556 1915 24.79 Dulat Rd T4drrt Utah AC-R4G5Ou13 tied-18AI1 2 32609.3 34.19 455977.5(1 Si b-lam $1,794.98114 $.0 M�EItln6111>!Peolleil/C 1115.151219]12 7chrng 55.10.07 J.#Q 511111 Sub.14111 55 3.3IU.oe Sulr!otalttyeruv.'a C Frcurnz.trve 1229[564. 4 TotelOtIr7ay 751,.,il uri or.and Pr,ve1ria Ore 54,790r`4L78 r1,rtr:The w3 between,nall,nd uvular Ai nd C llretvnsu uUiun napinuaina tely6/Hoes 2011 Prepuwd 2ULLlr1-U eA.sxus LR,6idrrllli411 R,w.fs-rresarraliun Prnnrun 4W Er125po*1Er11h11ay 2011 Parwrwr,l Manaseritnl Hui Update Proloct No. Segment ID pj Route From To J,3,-,Activity Number of Lanes Pavement Ares[SF) Improved CC PlanGOVlt Suggested Rudgetts Oyer/Under Suggested Budget Storrrwatcr Upgrades tx-/N) Flaarear 7066 Overly Prnlecm 5#79 40711 An Pocevcs Mien AC-AC L 115, rInlr 2 75791Jd7 R' inIA7 7-0,1ta,44 5 157 116Si 158 1474 .i4AL 14a1Qna YalCrtd Yak 11,11, AC-ACLf 2F:Weiler 2 F011106 III CR97 $21.-q1'210 5 159 1167 34.27 Retie Pd Spraro Lake 14 Dyer AC,-PC 1.9cal O•rtrkiir AC•AC local&red.! 213466.0011 !&57 536.62333 5 160 {.60 3433 357 ,,7E M. 2 21246.60 A' 89185 57149935 5 161 1356 3434 4- nia 5a 13111 751E AC-AC Waal q,hrlsr 2 3454260 R' 5634 0155-6.5024 S 157 1732 9.1.11 aqn AL 1)10m4n WA Dowd Ali AC-AC LOCa CrNerlar 2 5261.90 R' 3222 $138,2432 5 I 163 1574 30.11 26111 An E131j,e Owls AC•ACSCC.11 vaerlrr 7 45&77169 EL' 50.15 $124.6516.7 5 151 1140 3415 FandlerFat 14th 15111 AC-AC Local lverlar 2 5xer-o1 n' mini. 325,678,34 5 155 1104 1d521s[4n End Union AC-AC local:v5Elar AC-RC local Overlay 2111551./0 2 h' 341751.9/IV 86-07 85.37 $513FO,44 5916212$ 5 5 166 1495 14.7 Sartase&Slke Frontal/ Veder McDonald 167 921 30.92 Mara An Bae,did, Wilbur AC•ACLn J 11rrrlar 2 18623.24 rte 83_97 67155 5. 168 1424 35.55 Newer Rd 11111 16th AL-AC I ots1 a•e/1.7 2 7175494.110 f4' 9r1 79 551:140.60 S 159 1571 351 tad Av Mines End AL-!4C Sail Deaden 7 7771935010 46,37 010,42206 0 120 1300 35.33 Wab161 Rd I111 1619 AC-AC Weil Cherlly 2 71210.013 EL. 91718 9218.225,57 6 171 191 35,3 voider 512 544454 Farrvst AC:-AC Sxel 0"111517 23042909' 82.37 598579.33 6 172 946 95.55 Mayrarr Rd 5prnree Itverride AT-AC Local 12.gerl"F 3 36711490 re 17.76 35&331.20 5 133 1484 35,50 21,1 AS Grerre GUNK AC-AC Lnal Ow Haw 2 1081.40 5' 4537 599,909,57 5 174 1562 35..7 Wcidawlr Ile SASS'S FSrrot AC-IC Lear O.,e dal. _ 217577,4010 97737 $129,663.49 S 135 1.556 95.71 Fl7uk2 211e alh AC-AC 5 111D,nerar 114556.4010 Warr $40,651,41 S. 136 949 154 main AV McDDmdd End AC-AC 1n0710yerl 214555405• 47.26 367•60.65 S 177 667 1€.91 1-idiaw13 End End AC-AC Leaf 29dnrbe 211726 ,Llee 94-49 590.37624 5 178 294 9592. 1lu1AY E3ersrn MARL h AC-ALLass1 Ova day 2 12255.65 II' KLEE 545295.23 S 174 3935 16.44 Main An wdLS,r PIM* AC-AC Wear;P9 11117 2 05017.61 le 11897 Si 76233936 S 110 573 A% Dye 94 VJkr.aay 8madvrar n4-AC lonL V+crlsr 2114709211 89.86 5131,710311 S 181 i#7 940 7 2x3 36.91 14.15 Coln s Rd Afire 99vadwIs AC-AC lout Con!Ur 2 18015.4011' 8706 5149.245,L7 5 woc40..1>d 54Wnw 32nd AC-AC 57,51 ale,* 2 10239.10 5' 119BS $$2.22776 5 1113 1540 36.6 213 t i.3 End lenhcrane AC-AClineal Denney 2 9061725' 8897 513,715.76 5 194 1363 35.-32 Unger Dr Schur! OkiSohado Ai'-At lualC:ii dm- 17725707.' ISM 33 006,35 5. 1315 1413 37.2254511913C5t End 13711 AC-AC Lanai Me day 21272!9.66. I1 90 29 1 3.1.13411 52,1E-9,45313 Reeoran rloan Prajens, 186 2595 24.50 22nd An Vera Crei conllin AC-Recon2n12t1Gn-52111 2 47217.12 24.56 56098,6024 797 1733 35.41 5th Av FAT Woad!ull AG-RCC2ni2rV[tion.Lx;ri 2 25962 25.91 1A2 R6l 36.477 Nor Sid 3 .xp.n Park End Elia AC Reconu.oc[ron-Local AC-Roc ol2O5lciion.11x41 2 2 16461 49636 26.17 21,07 453579.323 toe 165 3651 vane Wry An 191 405 21.18 57itl5 PA Tr[m MO AC ':ns9Aictro i.Lecoi 2 1$564-64 2514 1936.71.5172 191 382 27.721211941! Re EMI Medfg2mhy _ AC.R{Crrn[rru2:nn-heal 2 174611E 2731 765556341 - 1 _ 3u5-6067] 51,834,10434 11130 140:70:41M401 Mild= I ry I Creek Seal anal Patehing $693 a920 $6.043 Skibilizl 6596,920.00 Sub-mud Crwee1A and Prs+.Enlalive 57.519,456.10 Tpeal Overlay llecansinrclion and Preve1ea171r $0.75#35297 Roes The cost 6atrre•n a rrdl and mertrie and full ramrmract Ion Ls appro-mmraly 6 minx 2011 Phlpdsrd ladd1.t-17701*44036 la*ti1 i all H7ad5•Frriorratrar Pr1arlm Pay of Vol,..V�312 2011 Pavement Maha4emen 9120 update Project No, 54 rmernt 10 00 Route Frarn To PIanAtbatty Number of Lanes Pararnent Au ca(5l Irnproved OCI Plan Cast Suggested Etudgattt OverJunder Suggested oudget starmwatef Upgrades♦;YfN) ilanYeae 7017 Ovedpr Frilled= L42 1421 3221S 30th Are 11nierdky_ R4nnra 0ovduri AG-AC toad rl,ndiv 21661MMQ' 6567 $31].22 30 133 1582• 3331 1.81h A. terlr OrrlI AC-AClool D'I1137 2434749.040 041 572. Ed 194 1750 3a97 'Yorker Rd 71:11 8171 AC-AC Ldnl 09th? 216014409IF R$-117 549,511.14 195 1967 33,4 McDonald Rd 17th 34.st AC-AC La*• 2 605332611 99.5.4 $177.02 2A 146 197 1746 33.09 33-484t{haekr 34th AV Meliw Pines AC-AC Loa Dwarf 2 36621 001N 9958 5.167-299.53 1413 Rd Rid 13th 13th 34th AC-AC Lem!Brvmr AC.AC Lou.'Overlay 2 7 41307 00* 90.48 513&1704-96 199 1276 2354 71rmd•ord Rd 51.411.81141 3144 5151944311 LOS 1159. 33-64 Rm.:M-w 6r Red End AC'-ACr..alOem* 2 7604-00 R' 93-32 $16,11612 200 1643 33-3129thAV Files T]9Tree AC-ACLq[alO idav 2 9990400 le 69325,7811 9&97 15951 5,792,71L77 $383,1121-54 211 1567 3391 Prove:s9d 114111 2419 AL;-AG740101m* 2 202 902 34m Rarr.m.t ad 5W-41-e Vtltiyway AC-AC Leo!Oyerlay 2426819211 67.76 5125.OG&.03 203 909 3.904 Rh.trd.A, lhIPmrrhy End Ar-ACL4K4iCvalar AC-AC Local Ooellag 2 2 ]363930 ft, 3:99Sa00 ft' 87.76 66.07 540.544-15 5L17.005-77 264 1174 34-1 NEW Rd Sprague 419 245 1724 34-12 34111 A. G!•.n Ank Ar•PC Lora!flu?An. 2 L000Q 00 R° 11951 5.11.644.0. 206 1491 3421 Calk Fork 73rd RA At-AC Loral Cnlelst. AC AC Lacaltvegla. 21201.30 2 rt' 31974.20{1 98.9F 901,7 111.67 3"15234-81 554,443.01 Ssag,A98 52 20/ 210 3139 VIM Rd E1elld Meer 206 1442 7134 51dpwa4t Rd 15th 24th AC.AC Loral Overlay 2 105764103 FP 3119 1515 34.4 22nd AV Me0ona16 MI* AC-AC Lad o"o'bR 253855.21171 x507 •457735-74 214 1737 34.66 31dpwaIN lid Nei 3114 AC-AC laud 0...br 2 7800.91 ft. 68-67 $22,9r.4.A0 211 1479 3497lan1e110 000 314 AC-AC Lund Ounklr 21244as54I 8958 576,474.4! 5164:421 62.496.49141 50,E6 9eerad 1.dU8d 712 9303 2193 Conkla Rd Vors¢a.t 23rd AC4uaonstrw1924-1usl 1 97 23.6 27.43 89d78L512 213 1.934 23_99 1Fudoe7rAr Parker End AC-R2roeanrrxio.-1 I 2 WIDE. 21.09 805103.019 714 1.114 29.03 Eraah 49 9t 8[11 End AtA.. nrrnn-los]I 3 4545 =.09 104144.56 54,15-1:4W $1,717.998311 50.80 crack Leel mil Mehl . Suh'enml 55+21,400.011 %- 5500_000.410 59b-tatal Overlay end Pre enmt a 7nb1 0...54.9.ou. odbn Mid ors 01124{v,e 5.7.166•4di.61 54.714,477-l4 1 Nam:Flu r o d h h.... a mill and rn9wlay2nrl Rill rnronAnOC1 km is apppsomjEA,4 V mes 2017 Proposed Budget-Local Access[Residential)Roads-Preservattan Program City of Spolkne Val[ey 1011 Pavement Management Pran Update Segment ID OC:I Segment It]\Route Segment rIARoute Back 5ehrnent ID\Route Ahead Plan Activity I Segment ID\Number of Lanes Segment 1D\Pavernent Area Improved OCI Plan Cast Reconstruction Projects 1953 17.76 Vera Crest Cr End 24th AC-Rec. ns ruction-Local 2 143326.$0 17,76 $1,586,955.44 605 11.15 Jackson CuI-De-Sac Er End Jackson AC-Recon5trnCtiOn-LOGial 2 4600.00 11.15 554,142.00 928 14.89 Whipple Rd End Main AC-Reconstruction-Leta I 2 5021108 14.89 $59.178534 597 18.05 Marietta Av McMillan Montgomery AC-Reeonslructian-Local 2 25262,40 18.05 $297338.45 1715 18.1 Sonora Dr 24th End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 28702.4$ 18.1 $337,823.48 1594 12Z 20th Ct Vera Crest End AC-ReconstructIon-Lana) 2 17603.54 183 $207,194.37 607 20.94 Montgomery Cul-De-Sac Dr Montgomery End AC-Reconstruction-LOG51 2 580040 20.94 $44.726.00 1006 21.5 Alki Av 6arker Michigan AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 38322.16 21,5 $455,935.82 604 29.47 McMIIIan Rd Montgomery Buckeye AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 34135,20 29.47 $401216.38 606 4.04 Montgomery CuI-De-Sac Dr Montgomery End AC-Reconstruction-Lang 2 4520,00 904 $53,200.40 554 21.69 Bridgeport Av End Barker AC-Reconstruction-LoceI 2 51446.00 21.59 $605,519.42 1703 22 Best Rd 24th 32 rid AC-R.ecenstructhan-Leal 2 58428.04 22 $527.598.03 1960 22.54 33rd Au Pierce Woodward AC-Reconstruction-Lap] 2 41018.00 22.94 $482,7$1_$6 300 29.03 Mansfield Av End Ea51Ern AC-Reconstruc ion-Lora] 2 41543,36 29.63 $488,965.35 1923 2321 Balfour Rd Sprague Main AC-Reconstruction-Loco I 2 21237.12 23.51 $249,960.90 550 24.02 Kiernan Au End Sulliuen AC Reconstruction-Leca I 2 43423.50 24.02 $511,095.77 1509 24.14 CanklirrCt 22nd End AC-Reconstru Lion-Local 2 760000 24.14 $89,452.00 1915. 24.19 Dollar Rd Trent Utah AC-Reconstruction-Loral 2 38696.20 24.19 $455,47721 1595 24.56 22nd Av Vera Crest Conklin AC-Reconstruction-La l 2 47247.12 2436 $556,098.60 1235 25.81 6th Av Farr Woodruff AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 25962_00 2S.81 $305,572.74 563 26-07 Oyer Rd Sprague End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 7860.86 26.07 $92,521.62 1365 26.07 ValreywayAv Park Ella AC-Reconstruction-Lon 2 4032920 26.07 5474,67939 305 26.18 Dickey Rd Trent Knox AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 16964.64 26.16 $199,673.81. 380 27.71 University Rd End Montgomery AC-Reconstruction-Local , 2 17464.66 27.72 $2.OS,S51#_14 1601 2733 Conklin Rd Vera Crest 23rd AC-Recpnttructotan-Lasal 2 68715.60 27.93 $66$,782.61 1934 2$.99 Buckeye Av Barker End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 68403.40 28.99 SB05,108.02 1114 20.09 Eliraheth St 8th End AC-Reconstruction-Local 2 584.5130 29.09 $104,105-65 Total $10,722,274.62 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 20, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business [' new business [' public hearing [' information ® admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Regional Animal Shelter GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N/A BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley has contracted with Spokane County for animal control services since the City's inception. According to the County, the current facility is not an option for the future. The County ballot measure to purchase and renovate a new facility was not approved by the voters. The County is proposing a non-ballot option of purchasing the old Harley Davidson building on Trent utilizing existing revenue sources. The County is asking Spokane Valley and Spokane to contribute toward this purchase. OPTIONS: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The County has indicated that the City's share of capital costs for the new building would be $990,000. The County has not provided costs for other long-term options. STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint and Interlocal Agreement for Animal Control Spokane .Valley Regional Animal Control Facility March 20 , 2012 Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst Background Spokane County Regional Animal Protection Services (SCRAPS) currently provides animal protection services for the unincorporated County and four other jurisdictions (by contract), including Spokane Valley. . - A -inv inv .1, . - • . - - ■ - -mr .1, inv A services to Spokane. Update.- SpokAnimal has reversed course and said they will continue providing animal control services. Spokane intends to utilize SCRAPS. Update: It is unknown at this time if Spokane will participate in the latest proposal. The current facility cannot accommodate the City of Spokane and is in need of significant updates. Update.- The County has stated that staying in the current facility is not an option regardless of whether Spokane joins the regional coalition. Officials from multiple jurisdictions toured the current facility on June 11 , 2010 and agreed to have staffs work together on a cost analysis. Staff from Spokane, Liberty Lake, and Spokane Valley met with County staff and Commissioner Mielke. This group has been referred to as a task force. The resultant Task Force met several times and has concluded its initial analysis. Update.- The Task Force determined that the option of renovating a City of Spokane owned property was not possible utilizing current operational dollars. The County decided to pursue a county-wide ballot measure . That measure failed. has identified a new non-ballot option. 2 County- Identified Facility Needs 6 acres including a dog park 42 , 000 square feet for facility with 22% for office / administrative function . Centrally located and visible , proximity to I - 90 preferred On a bus route Parking available ballot Option $ 1 5 million through 9 year levy lid - lift Purchase and renovate Havana property owned by City of Spokane Measure rejected by voters New Option Proposed by County Purchase and convert former Harley Davidson building on Trent . Total cost is $ 4 . 5 million Would require re -zoning All partners contribute all capital costs upfront or Spokane County funds through existing funds and charges users a building usage fee . County Proposal - Capita I Cysts Jurisdiction Estimated Percentage of Workload Percentage of Building Ownership Share of Cost City of Spokane City of Spokane Valley Spokane County 50% 22% 28% 50% 22% 28% Total $ 2 .25 Million $ 990,000 $ 1 . 26 Million $4. 5 Million 6 County Proposal - Operational Costs Received 3 / 6 / 12 Spokane County SCRAPS Model - ESTIMATED (Revised Revenue and Participation for City @ 51.7%) (Based on 2010 Activity and 2011 Budgeted RevenuelExpenditures) Expenses Salaries/wages/benefits 1,796,125 Revised Regional Correction Workers 140,525 Revised Regional M&O 496,343 Estimated Sub Total 2,432,993 Indirect Costs: Prosecutor 15% 364,949 Revised Regional (63,186) Estimated Total Expenses 2,734,756 Revenues County License&Fees SpokAnimal License&Fees Projected Increase Expenses less Revenues Spokane County Spokane Valley Millwood Cheney. Liberty Lake City of Spokane Tote ASSUMPTIONSIISSUES City pays cost of converting SpokAnimal Data to SCRAPS system Unknown costs-Facilities Maintenance Unknown costs-Depreciation Unknown costs-Utilities 747,745 2011 Budget 800,961 Estimate based on 2005 In(nrmatten -- 1, 6,C16nre,),A Y S517 1AGED C as Total Revenues 1,648,706 1,086,050 Net Operating Costs 1,086,050 rnieZE l coN.mod Estimated Percent of Services(Excluding Investigations) Cost Adjust for Indirect Paid by County Adjusted Cost Based on Percent of Services 23.84% 258,914 0 258,914 22.29% 242,081 46.16% 242,081 0.43% 4,670 0.88% 4,670 0.96% 10,426 1.98% 10,426 0.78% 8,471 1.62% 8,471 51.70% 561,488 561,488 100.00% 1,086,056 100.00% 1,086,050 Imo; urriod Estimated Percent of Services (Excluding City of Spokane) Adjusted Cost Based on No increase for City of Spokane 2011 Budget 1 Net Savings 49.36% 258,912 380,435 121,523 46.16% 242,079 305,799 63,720 0.88% 4,670 8,157 3,487 1.98% 10,426 13,509 3,083 1.62% 8,471 12,636 '; 4,165 561,492 561,492 j - 100.00% 1,086,050 1,282,028 1 195,978 1 Co. Proposal - Operational Costs Received Sept. 20T 1 Spokane County SCRAPS Model - ESTIMATED (Based on 2010 Activity and 2011 Budgeted Revenue/Expenditures) Expenses Salaries/wages/benefits 1,796,125 Revised Regional Correction Workers 140,525 Revised Regional M&O 496,343 Estimated 2,432,993 Indirect Costs: Prosecutor Grants&Contracts Sub Total 20% Total Expenses 486,599 Revised Regional (63,186) Estimated 38,617 2,895,023 Revenues County License& Fees 747,745 2011Budget SpokAnimal License&Fees 800,961 Estimate based on 2009 Information Projected Increase 200,000 Total Revenues 1,748,706 Expenses less Revenues Indirect Cost on Grants&Contracts Net Operating Costs Spokane County Spokane Valley Millwood Cheney Liberty Lake City of Spokane Total 1,146,317 (38,617) Paid by County 1,107,700 Estimated Percent of Services(Excluding Investigations) Cost Adjust for Indirect Paid by County Adjusted Cost Based on Percent of Services 19.61% 217,220 38,617 255,837 18.34% 203,174 203,174 0.35% 3,877 3,877 0.79% 8,722 2011 Budget 8,722 0.65% 7,145 380,435 7,145 60.27% 667,566 305,799 667,566 100.00% 1,107,700 8,157 1,146,321 ASSUMPTIONS/ISSUES City pays cost of converting SpokAnimal Data to SCRAPS system Unknown costs-Facilities Maintenance Unknown costs-Depreciation Unknown costs-Utilities Estimated Percent of Adjusted Cost Services Based on No (Excluding City of Increase for Spokane) City of Spokane 2011 Budget Net Savings 49.35% 308,187 380,435 72,249 46.16% 252,139 305,799 53,660 0.88% 4,811 8,157 3,346 1.98% 10,824 13,509 2,685 1.62% 8,867 12,636 3,769 561,492 561,492 - 100.00% 1,146,319 1,282,028 135,709 8 Assessment of Projections County revenue decreased from $ 748K in 201 1 to $ 683 in 2012 budget . Is the County experiencing a decreasing revenue trend? Is the same trend occurring for Spokane? Indirect costs have decreased for 2012 and the 15 % rate seems achievable . 2011 indirect rate was 23%, 2012 rate is 14%. 2012 SV estimate is $ 268K versus projected regional costs of $ 242K suggested Questions for County How are purchase contribution percentages determined for the three jurisdictions? • Why was the City of Spokane percentage reduced from 60% to 50%? • Can a method utilizing data be used (ASPCA, SpokAnimal, Population)? Why aren 't the smaller jurisdictions contributing to capital costs? Who will own and maintain the facility? What will be the term (length) of the service contract in a new facility? When will Spokane decide if they are participating? Have operating costs been calculated specifically for the Harley Davidson building? g How will each jurisdictions share of costs be determined? How will the operating costs be affected if Spokane does not participate? What happens when the contract term expires (if SV contributes capital costs upfront)? Will the County charge Spokane Valley a building usage fee? • Will Spokane Valley have any equity in the property? 10 Questions Continued If the County provides a fixed cost contract to Spokane will the same arrangement be offered to the other partners? Will usage be tracked and will that factor into future costs? Is the County willing to provide the capital funding and charge the partners usage or depreciation over the life of the agreement? If so, how will the usage or depreciation charges be calculated? How will these charges change after the capital investment is recouped by the County? Will the County be willing to to set the terms in writing (operating and capital)? Spokane Valley Historical Animal Control Spokane Valley has contracted with Spokane County since incorporation for animal control services. SV usage has decreased from 48% in 2008 to 46% for 2012 . �,4inual Increase from 2004-2012 -4. 19% 12 Year Animal Control Costs Change Actual 2004 $ 375, 137 Actual 2005 $ 372,491 -0.71 % Actual 2006 $ 377,232 1 .27% Actual 2007 $ 387, 190 2.64% Actual 2008 $ 329,642 -14.86% Actual 2009 $ 322,570 -2. 15% Actual 2010 $ 295,308 -8.45% Co. Estimated 2011 $ 307,516 4. 13% Co. Estimated 2012 $ 268,334 -12.74% �,4inual Increase from 2004-2012 -4. 19% 12 Other Service Options One other service provider In - house Next Steps Council finalizes questions Get answers to questions from County Get information for other service options if Council desires Present all information as well as draft interlocal agreements to Council Council decides which option to pursue " Task force reconvenes Return to: Daniela Erickson, Clerk of the Board Board of County Commissioners 1 116 W. Broadway Spokane, Washington 99260 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR AN IAL CONTROL SERVICES IN THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 6 0189 (January 1,2005—December 31,2005) THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 1116 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY" and the City of Spokane Valley, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at the Redwood Plaza, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206, hereinafter referred to as "CITY,"jointly hereinafter referred to as the "PARTIES." The COUNTY and CITY agree as follows. SECTION NO. 1: RECITALS AND FINDINGS (a) The Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County has the care of COUNTY property and the management of COUNTY funds and business under RCW 36.32.120(6). (h) Counties and cities may contract with each other to perform certain functions which each may legally perform under chapter 39.34 RCW(Interloe.al Cooperation Act). (c) Pursuant to the provisions of 36.32.120(6) and RCW 36.32.120(7), Spokane County, through its Board of County Commissioners, may enact ordinances dealing with animal control within the unincorporated area of Spokane County. (d) City of Spokane Valley may enact ordinances dealing with animal control within its boundaries. (e) The City of Spokane Valley desires to utilize the services of Spokane County for the purpose of performing certain animal control functions within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley. Animal Control Interlocal Pagel of 16 C06-13 SECTION NO. 2: DEFINITIONS (a) Agreement: "Agreement" means this Interlocal Agreement between the CITY and COUNTY regarding animal control services. (b) City: "CITY"means the City of Spokane Valley. (c) County: "COUNTY"means Spokane County. (d) Maintenance and Operations: "Maintenance and Operations" and "M&O" shall mean those class codes (3000-5999 and 7000-9999) used by Spokane County in its budgetary process as prescribed by the BARS manual adopted by the State of Washington under chapter 43.88 RCW so long as such expenditures are directly attributable and proportionate to services rendered to CITY under the terms of this Agreement. (e) Services: "Services"means those services identified in Exhibit: 1. Those Services do not include Hearing Examiner services. Hearing Examiner services are included in a separate agreement. (1) Compensation: "Compensation" means that methodology set forth in Exhibit 2 used to establish the amount of money which the CiTY will pay the COUNTY for providing Services. (g) Capital Improvement:: "Capital Improvement" shall mean any expenditure in excess of $1999.99 or such higher figure as set:by the COUNTY as the capitalization threshold during the term of the Agreement. The COUNTY shall give the CITY advance notice of any increase in the capitalization threshold. The PARTIES agree to meet and discuss the impacts of any change in the capitalization threshold which will cause an increase of costs to the CITY in excess of $50,000.00. Any such expenditure will be coded as provided for in the BARS-manual adopted by the State of Washington under RCW 43.88. • (h) Uncontrollable Circumstances: "Uncontrollable Circumstances" means the following events: riots, wars; civil disturbances, insurrections, acts of terrorism, external fires and floods, volcanic eruptions, lightning or earthquakes at or near where the Services are performed and/or that directly affect providing of such Services. • (i) Report: "Report" means the time study prepared by the Spokane. County Regional Animal Protection Service Department. SECTION NO.3: PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to reduce to writing the PARTIES' understanding as to the terms and conditions under which the COUNTY will provide Services on behalf of the CITY. It is the intent of the PARTIES that Services to be provided by the COUNTY will be consistent with the CITY'S Council/Manager form of government provided for in chapter 35A.I3 RCW. Animal Control interlocal Page 2 of 16 SECTION NO.4: DURATION/VVITHDRAWAL This Agreement shall commence on January 1,2005,and run through December 31,2005. At the conclusion of the initial term, this Agreement shall automatically be renewed from year to year thereafter effective January I" to December 31' All renewals shall be subject to all terms and conditions set forth herein except for Exhibit 2. The PARTIES recognize it highly unlikely that Exhibit 2 setting forth the estimated costs for each year's Services will be available at the start of any renewal time frame. Accordingly, until a new Exhibit 2 has been prepared and agreed to between the PARTIES, the PARTIES agree that the COUNTY will bill the • CITY and the CITY will pay the COUNTY at the same monthly payment rate used for the previous year. - Upon the PARTIES agreement on a new Exhibit 2, the CITY and COUNTY will reconcile payments to date • under the previous years payment schedule with the new payment schedule. Any underpayment for any Services will be due in the first payment due following reconciliation. Any overpayment for any Services will be credited to the first monthly payment.due following the reconciliation. The PARTIES agree that no interest shall be.owing by either Party to the other Party for any overpayment or underpayment determined as a result of the reconciliation. Any Party may withdraw at any time from this Agreement for any reason whatsoever upon a minimum of 180 days written notice as provided for in Section 7 to the other Party. SECTION NO.5: COST OF SERVICES AND PAYMENTS The CITY shall pay the COUNTY the actual costs for Services provided under this Agreement. The estimated cost for 2005 Services under this Agreement shall be as set forth in Exhibit 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. This methodology uses the last six (6) months of Report numbers for 2003 and first six (6) months of Report numbers for 2004 and averages them for a twelve (12) month time frame. The resulting number is used as a basis to estimate the 2005 cost of Services. The COUNTY CEO shall advise the CITY Manager as soon as possible of any anticipated or unanticipated capital improvement costs that. arise during the contract period. The City shall pay capital improvement costs either (1) under the Cost Allocation Plan as an indirect cost amortized over the useful life of the improvement utilizing straight- line depreciation and incorporating the expected salvage value of the improvement at the end of its useful life or (2) as a direct cost in the form of a contribution made to the Equipment Rental and Revolving Fund. The CITY shall be responsible only for capital improvement costs incurred after March 31, 2003. Any portion of a capital improvement that was paid for or acquired through separate agreement or with grant proceeds, bond proceeds, user fees, donations, or any other acquisition method that reflects a contribution on behalf of CITY shall not be included in the depreciation schedule applied to the CITY. Any capital improvement for which the COUNTY seeks reimbursement from the CITY must be necessary to fulfill the requirements of this Agreement. At the end of the calendar year, using the methodology set forth in Exhibit 2, the PARTIES shall apply the actual expenditures and the actual usage percentage to determine the final cost. It is the PARTIES intent that any adjustment take place as soon as possible and accordingly will use their respective best efforts to timely prepare, disseminate and review all expenditure documentation. The CITY will have sixty (60) calendar days from its receipt of the expenditure documentation to provide the COUNTY with any written Animal Control Interlocal Page 3 of 16 • objections(s) to such documentation. The written objection(s) must specifically identify the expenditure(s) in question. The COUNTY agrees to consider all written objections received from the CiTY within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the objections(s). in the event that the PARTIES cannot mutually resolve any written objections) submitted by the CITY within the thirty (30) calendar days time frame, or such other time frame as the PARTIES may -mutually agree, the objections shall be resolved pursuant to the Dispute Resolution provisions set forth in Section No. 17. Pending resolution of the objections(s), the PARTIES agree that the CITY shall pay that portion of the bill that is undisputed. To the extent that the CiTY was over billed in any year and the Agreement is still in effect, the COUNTY shall credit the CITY for such overpayment in the next monthly payment owning by the CiTY. Provided, however, in the event the Agreement is terminated at such time that the overpayment is determined, the COUNTY shall reimburse the CITY for any overpayment within thirty (30) calendar days. To the extent that the CITY was under billed in any year and the Agreement is still in effect, the CITY shall reimburse the COUNTY for any underpayment in the next monthly payment owing by the CITY. Provided, however, in the event the Agreement is terminated at such time that the underpayment is determined, the CITY shall reimburse the COUNTY for any underpayment within thirty(30)calendar days. Either Party may at its sole option charge interest on any overpayment or underpayment based on lost interest earning had the amount determined due been invested in the respective PARTIES investment pool at the end of the thirty(30) day time frame provided for hereinabove to the date of payment. Any resolution of a disputed amount through use of the arbitration process identified in Section 17 shall include at the request of either Party, a determination of whether interest is appropriate, including the amount. The COUNTY will bill the CITY for the cost of services as outlined, monthly, by the 15th of the month. Monthly payments will be calculated by dividing those annual costs set: forth herein above by twelve (12). Payments by the CiTY will be due by the 5'" day of the following month. The COUNTY, at its sole option, may charge interest on any late payment calculated on any lost interest earning had the amount due been invested since the date due to the date of payment in the COUNTY's investment pool. The methodology contemplates that the COUNTY will retain all revenues as outlined in Exhibit 2, collected from performing such services. SECTION NO. 6: RELATED RESPONSIBILITIES Or CONJUNCTION WITH PROVIDING SERVICES The COUNTY or its designee agree to attend staff meetings as requested by the CITY Manager. The COUNTY or its designee agree to meet upon request by the CITY Manager or his/her designee to discuss any Service provided under the terms of this Agreement. The CITY agrees the COUNTY may use the COUNTY'S stationery in conjunction with providing Services under the terms of this Agreement. SECTION NO. 7: NOTICE All notices or other communications given hereunder shall be deemed given on: (1) the day such notices or other communications are received when sent by personal delivery; or(ii)the third day following the day on Animal Control interlocal Page 4 of 16 which the same have been mailed by first class delivery, postage prepaid addressed to the COUNTY or the CITY at the address set forth below for such Party, or at such other address as either Party shall from time- to-time designate by notice in writing to the other Party: • COUNTY: Spokane County Chief Executive Officer or his/her authorized representative 1 116 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 CITY: City of Spokane Valley City Manager or his/her authorized representative Redwood Plaza 1 1707 East Sprague Avenue; Suite 106 Spokane Valley, Washington 99206 SECTION NO.8: REPORTING &ports — The COUNTY shall provide the CITY with reports documenting actual usage under this Agreement. The Parties agree that the terminology "reports documenting actual usage" means that type of information provided by the COUNTY to the CITY in the 2004 agreement for Services. An updated report shall be submitted quarterly unless otherwise mutually agreed by the Parties. Such reports shall be in a format as mutually agreed to between the Parties. The content and/or format for such reports may be changed from time-to-time by written agreement between CITY and COUNTY staff. Records Review—The CITY shall be allowed to conduct random reviews of the records generated by the COUNTY in performance of this Agreement.. The CITY will provide the COUNTY with reasonable advance notice of the records reviews. The Parties agree that they will make best efforts to achieve a resolution of any potential records confidentiality issues, including entering into confidentiality agreements or other similar mechanisms that will allow disclosure of the necessary information to accurately conduct a records review. If the CiTY will be allowed to view only those records directly relating to Services provided within CITY's corporate boundaries, then the COUNTY must keep a log of original documents used to charge the CITY, and those documents must have identifying numbers or letters so the original source documents can be easily retrieved. SECTION NO.9: COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which, when so executed and delivered, shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same. SECTION NO. 10: ASSIGNMENT No Party may assign in whole or part its interest in this Agreement without the written approval of the other PARTY. SECTION NO. 11: COUNTY EMPLOYEES The COUNTY shall hire, assign, retain and discipline all employees performing Services under this Agreement according to applicable collective bargaining agreements and applicable state and federal laws. Animal Control Interlocal Page 5 of 16 • • The COUNTY agrees to meet and confer with the CITY with respect to staff that is assigned to provide Services. issues of discipline or performance will be specifically handled according to COUNTY policies. SECTION NO. 12: LIABILITY (a) The COUNTY shall indemnify and hold harmless the CITY and its officers,agents, and employees, from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of any negligent act or omission of the COUNTY, its officers, agents and employees, relating to or arising out of p- erforming Services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such claim, action, Toss, or damages is brought against the CiTY, the COUNTY shall defend the same at its sole cost and expense; provided that the CITY reserves the right to participate in said suit if any principle of governmental or public law is involved; and if final judgment in said suit be rendered against the CITY, and its officers, agents, and employees, or jointly against the CITY and the COUNTY and their respective officers,agents, and employees,the COUNTY shall satisfy the same, (b) The CITY shall indemnify and hold harmless the COUNTY and its officers,agents,and employees, from any and all claims; actions, suits, liability, loss; costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of any negligent act or omission of the CITY, its officers,agents and employees, relating to or arising out of performing Services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such claim, action, Toss, or damages is brought against:the COUNTY, the CiTY shall defend the same at its sole cost and expense; provided that the COUNTY reserves the right to participate in said suit if any principle of governmental or public law is involved; and if final judgment in said suit be rendered against the COUNTY, arid its officers, agents, and employees, or jointly against the COUNTY and the CiTY and their respective officers, agents, and employees, the CITY shall satisfy the same. (c) If the comparative negligence of the Parties and their officers and employees is a cause of such damage or injury, the liability, loss, cost, or expense shall be shared between the Parties in proportion to their relative degree of negligence and the right of indemnity shall apply to such proportion. (d) Where an officer or employee of a Party is acting under the direction and control of the other Party, the Party directing and controlling the officer or employee in the activity and/or omission giving rise to liability shall accept all liability for the other Party's officer or employee's negligence. (c) Each Party's duty to indemnify shall survive the termination or expiration of the Agreement. (f) The foregoing indemnity is specifically intended to constitute a waiver of each Party's immunity under Washington's Industrial Insurance Act, chapter 51 RCW, respecting the other party only, and only to the extent necessary to provide the indemnified Party with a full and complete indemnity of claims made by the indemnitor's employees. The PARTIES acknowledge that these provisions were specifically negotiated and agreed upon by them. (g) The COUNTY and the CiTY agree to either self insure or purchase policies of insurance covering the matters contained in this Agreement with coverages of not Tess than $5,000,000 per occurrence with $5,000,000 aggregate limits including professional liability and auto liability coverages. Animal Control interlocal Page 6 of 16 SECTION NO. 13: RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES The PARTIES intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. The COUNTY shall be an independent contractor and not the agent or employee of the CITY, that the CiTY is interested only in the results to be achieved raid that the right to control the particular manner, method and means in which the services are performed is solely within the discretion of the COUNTY. Any and all employees who provide Services to the CITY under this Ageement shall be deemed employees solely of the COUNTY. The COUNTY shall be solely responsible for the conduct and actions of all employees under this Agreement and any liability that may attach thereto. Likewise, no agent, employee, servant or representative of the CITY shall be deemed to be an employee, agent, servant or representative of the COUNTY for any purpose. SECTION NO. 14: MODIFICATION This Agreement may be modified in writing by mutual written agreement of the PARTIES. SECTION NO. 15: PROPERTY AND EQUT.PMENT The ownership of all property and equipment utilized in conjunction with providing the Services shall remain with the original owner, unless otherwise specifically and mutually agreed to by the PARTIES to this Agreement. For the purpose of this section, the terminology "owner" means that Party which paid the full purchase price for the property or equipment. SECTION NO. 16: ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN/BINDING EFFECT This Agreement contains terns and conditions agreed upon by the PA.RI IES. The PARTIES agree that there are no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement. No changes or additions to this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon the PARTIES unless such change or addition is in writing,executed by the PARTIES. This Agreement shall be binding upon the PARTIES hereto,their successors and assigns. SECTION NO. 17: DISPUTE RESOLUTION Any dispute between the PARTIES which cannot be resolved between the PARTIES shall be subject to arbitration. Except as provided for to the contrary herein, such dispute shall first be reduced to writing. If the COUNTY CEO and the CITY Manager cannot resolve the dispute it will be submitted to arbitration. The provisions of chapter 7.04 RC\7V shall be applicable to any arbitration proceeding. The COUNTY and the CITY shall have the right to designate one person each to act as an arbitrator. The two selected arbitrators shall then jointly select a third arbitrator. The decision of the arbitration panel shall be binding on the PARTIES and shall be subject to judicial review as provided for in chapter 7.04 RCW. The costs of the arbitration panel shall be equally split between the PARTIES. Animal Control lnterlocal Page 7 of 16 • SECTION NO. 18: VENUE STIPULATION This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and delivered within the State of Washington and it is mutually understood and agreed by each party that this Agreement shall he governed by the laws of the State of Washington both as to interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity or judicial proceeding for the enforcement of this Agreement, or any provision hereto, shall be instituted only in courts of competent jurisdiction within Spokane County, Washington. SECTION NO. 19: SEVERAHJLITY The PARTIES agree that if any parts, terms or provisions of this Agreement are held by the courts to be illegal, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected and the rights and obligations of the PARTIES shall not be affected in regard to the remainder of the Agreement. if it should appear that any part, term or provision of this Agreement is in conflict with any statutory provision of the State of Washington, then the part, term or provision thereof that may be in conflict shall be deemed inoperative and null and void insofar as it may be in conflict therewith and this Agreement shall be deemed to modify to conform to such statutory provision. SECTION NO.20: RECORDS All public records prepared, owned, used or retained by the COUNTY in conjunction with providing Services under the terms of this Agreement.shall be deemed CITY property and shall he made available to the CITY upon request by the CITY Manager subject to the attorney client and attorney work product privileges set forth in statute, court rule or case law. The COUNTY will notify the CITY of any public disclosure request under chapter 42.17 RCW for copies or viewing of such records as well as the COUNTY'S response thereto. SECTION NO. 21: TiEADiNGS The section headings appearing in this Agreement have been inserted solely for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. in no way do they purport to, and shall not be deemed to define, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they pertain. SECTION NO. 22: TIME OF ESSENCE OF AGREEMENT Time is of the essence of this Agreement and in case either Party fails to perform the obligations on its part to be performed at the time fixed for the performance of the respective obligation by the terms of this Agreement, the other Party may, at its election, hold the other Party liable for all costs and damages caused by such delay. SECTION NO. 23: UNCONTROLLABLE CIRCUMSTANCES/IMPOSSIBILITY A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement resulting from Uncontrollable.Circumstances shall he deemed not a default under this Agreement. A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement resulting from any change in or new law, order, rule or regulation of any nature which renders providing of Services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement legally impossible, and any other circumstances beyond the Animal Control interlocal Page 8 of 16 control of the COUNTY which render legally impossible the perfoimnance by the COUNTY of its obligations under this Agreement, shall be deemed not a default under this Agreement. SECTION NO. 24: FILING This Agreement shall be filed by the County with such offices or agencies as required by chapter 39.34 RCW. SECTION NO.25: EXECUTION AND APPROVAL The PARTIES warrant that the officers executing below have been duly authorized to act for and on behalf of the Party for purposes of confirming this Agreement. SECTION NO. 26: INITIATIVES The PARTIES recognize that revenue reducing initiative(s) passed by the voters of Washington may substantially reduce local operating revenue for the CITY, COUNTY or both PARTIES. The PARTIES agree that it is necessary to have flexibility to reduce the contracted amount(s) in this Agreement in response to budget constraints resulting from the passage of revenue reducing initiative(s). If such an event occurs, the PARTIES agree to negotiate in good faith to achieve a mutually agreeable resolution in a timely fashion. SECTION NO.27: COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The Parties shall observe all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, to the extent that they may be applicable to the terms of this Agreement. SECTION NO. 28: DISCLAIMER Except as otherwise provided, this Agreement shall not be construed in any manner that would limit either Party's authority or powers under law. SECTION NO. 29: ASSURANCE The CITY shall pay the COUNTY the true and full cost of all Services provided under this Agreement. The intent of the Parties is that neither Party will subsidize the other and that the CITY will not subsidize any other jurisdiction that is receiving similar services. Animal Control lnterlocal Page 9 of 16. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the PARTIES have caused this Agreement to be executed on date and year opposite their respective signatures. DATED.:n/4;e Q\\L t 9 p BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON v, A_ -71/eiter o e c• % '1, TO IELKE, Chair i It' O .g 4s, i ABSENT Clerk of the Board , • • S IARK RICHARD, Vice-Chair k ,// • _-;,„..--, ... ....-4.1r i ,,,,�i. _ _ . ...„ . ,....„. .i. .. -Daniela Erickson �'N.„,.‘____------ / /'� 4R.RJS, Commissioner DATED: !//4/, CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY: ,0 ..1i /de ' r) /�t e t David Mercier,City Manager yy((�i k i/'- Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY: 00.• --) ,. I • tj.AA4t(il_i Office of Ctity Attorney Animal Control Interlocal Page 10 of 16 EXH113ITr 1 COUNTY throug. the Spokane County Regional Animal Protection Services (SCRAPS) will provide Animal Control Services to CITY within the CtTY's boundaries. For the purpose of this Agreement, Animal Control Services shall include: 1. Enforcement of CITY'S Animal Control Ordinance; 2. Enforcement of CITY'S Inherently Dangerous Mammals/Reptiles Ordinance; 3. Enforcement of chapter 16.08 RCW(Dogs); 4. Enforcement of chapter 16.52 R.CW(Prevention of Cruelty to Animals); and 5. Enforcement of chapter 16.54 RCW(Abandoned Animals). Enforcement includes field services, shelter services, educational services, the licensing of dogs, cats and inherently dangerous mammals/reptiles, and appearing before all administrative and judicial hearings in • conjunction with such duties and Functions. Field Services include those provided during normal hours of operation as well as emergency services provided only after normal hours of operation. Normal hours of operation are Monday through Friday, 7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. and Saturday, 9:00 A.M.. to 5:00 P.M. except holidays. Field Services provided during normal hours of operation are: .(1) Dog at large complaints; (2) Cat at large on private property; (3) Dog barking; (4) Dog or cat— no license; (5) Dog or cat— no rabies vaccination; (6) Dog threatens person; (7) Dog threatens domestic animal; (8) Dog or cat bite; (9)Injured dog or cat; (10)Sick dog or cat;(1 1)Agency assist; (12) Abandoned animal; (13) Animal cruelty; (14) Dead on arrival dog or cat; (i5) Confined dog or cat; (16) Trapping dog or cat; (17) Vicious dog; (18) Kennel inspections; (19) Dangerous dog inspections; (20) Inherently dangerous mammal or reptile inspections; and (21) Other as deemed necessaiy by the department. Field Services provided after normal hours of operation, referred to as Emergency Services, include: (1) Injured or sick dog/cat; (2) Dog cat bite—dog/cat is still at large; (3) Dog bite—severe clog bite(victim is in hospital and dog will need to be quarantined immediately in the county shelter); (4) Vicious or threatening dog—dog threatens persons or domestic animals and is still at large; (5)Animal in our humane trap that is making a disturbance or injuring itself; (6) Other law enforcement agency requests our assistance when animals are involved; (7) Other emergency such as extreme cruelty, pet dying in a hot vehicle, etc.; (8) Exotic DANGEROUS PET at large (i.e., cougar, tiger, wolf, bear, etc.); and (9) Multiple calls on same problem—animal control officer on call will evaluate and make a determination on whether to respond. Shelter Services are provided Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday, from 10:00 A.M. to 5:30 P.M., and Saturday from 1:00 P.M. to 4:30 P.M., closed Wednesday, Sunday and holidays, and include full service animal shelter services: (1) Housing dog/cat—occasional other animal; (2) Pet license program; (3) After hours animal receiving room; (4) Animal redemptions; (5) Adoption program; (6) Volunteer program; (7) Dog training program; (8) Trapping program; and (9) Crematorium on site. Educational services include: (1) Dog bite prevention program — elementary schools and service workers; (2) School career fair participation; (3) Specialty presentations available upon request; (4) Public service announcements — newspaper, radio and television; (5) Community outreach — fair booth, license clinics, special events, etc.; and(6) Website. Animal Control Interlocal Page 11 of 16 The COUNTY may conduct surveys within CITY for unlicensed dogs and cats. In conjunction with the enforcement of Items No. 1 and 2 herein above, CITY shall adopt and keep current by appropriate legislative action, both an (i) Animal Control Ordinance and (ii) Inherently Dangerous Mammals/Reptiles Ordinance substantially identical to those adopted by COUNTY as they presently exist or as they may hereinafter be modified/amended, to include all fees/penalties. This responsibility shall not be deemed a restriction upon the CITY's legislative power. The City of Spokane Valley may enact ordinances dealing with animal control within its boundaries;and COUNTY shall provide CITY with a copy of Chapter 5.04 and Chapter 5.12 of the Spokane County Code and all subsequent modifications/amendments thereto. CITY shall provide COUNTY with copies of its adopted/amended Ordinances substantially identical to Chapters 5.04 and 5.12 of the Spokane County Code. CITY shall provide legal counsel to prosecute any citations/complaints issued by COUNTY in enforcement of Items No. 1 through 5 herein above in the Municipal Court or Superior Court. In performing the above Animal Control Services, COUNTY will provide such personnel, as it deems necessary as well as any and all vehicles and materials of any kind or nature whatsoever at no cost to CITY. COUNTY will provide Animal Control Services above and beyond those set forth herein to CITY at cost negotiated between CITY and COUNTY. Animal Control Interlocal Page 12 of 16 Exhibit 2 Spokane County Spokane Valley Animal Control 2005 Contract Component A Component B Component C 2005 Percentage Adopted Budget * Spokane Valley ** Contract Amount Departmental Expenditures • Salary 804,917.00': 49.24% 396,341.13 M R O 206,980.00 49.24% 101,916.95 • Indirect Costs *** 271,577.80 49.24% 133,724.91 Departmental Revenues 420,994.00 =. 49.24%- 207,297.45 Total 862,480.80•' 424,685.55 — Notes *Component A represents Animal Control's 2005 adopted budget for revenues and expenditures. Revenues do not include estimated donations, neutering reimbursements and surcharges, and contract revenues. **The percentage of services provided to Spokane Valley is based upon the results of a Time Study performed by the Animal Control Services Department. The percentage of services provided to Spokane Valley was 49.24% based on statistics(January- Dee 2004). See Attachment A. Component A multiplied by Component R equates the contract amount. ***The Indirect(Overhead) rate of 33.74% is only applied to salaries. The indirect rate is based on Spokane County's OMB A-87 Cost.Plan Escalated 2003 for 2005, adjusted to only include • depreciation of capital improvements acquired after the City's official date of incorporation, prepared by PRM Group, an independent plan preparer. See Attachment 13. Animal Control Interlocal Page 13 of 16 • , Spokane County Spokane Valley Animal Control Attachment it-Time Study Statistics January—December, 21104 2005 Contract Request for Emergency _ Service Impounds Investigations Calls Trap in Total % Spokane County 4,418 3,215 350 5.1 • 160 8,194 47.59% Spokane sllley 4,332 3,563 294 96 194 8,479 49.24% Millwnnd 83 65 3 1 2 154 0.89% Cheney 160 135 12 1 2 310 1.80% Fairchild AITB 30 46 3 3 - 82 0.48% Total 9,023 7,024 662 152 358 17,219 100.00% • • Animal Conte& Inter/ncai Page l4 of 16 Spokane County,Washington OMB A-87 -Indirect Cost Rates Fiscal 2003 for Budget Year 2005 (Includes Escalation Factor Applied to 2003 Actuals to More Accurately Reflect Costs for 2005) (2005 Budgeted Salary&Benefits excludes multi-year salary& benefits) (Adjusted to exclude Building and Equipment Depreciation for Purpose of Outside Contracts) Attachment B-Indirect Rate for 2005 Central Service Less: Bldg Less: Equip Adjusted Central Salary& Indirec Department Cost Deprec Deprec Service Cost Benefits Cost Rate Animal Control " 281,040 7,145 2,317 271,578 804,917 33/4% Communicati ons 144,054 357 48,907 94,790 382,272 24.80% Counsel for Defense 63,074 2,032 1,432 59,610 707,207 8.43% District Court 984,614 10,350 22,707 951,557 4,493,138 21.18% Emergency Services 188,247 2,383 23,349 162,515 332,951 48.81% Hearing Examiner** 13,548 - 111 13,437 152,681 8.80% Pre-Trial 122,409 123 440 121,846 317,774 38.34% !Probation 48,651 354 2,473 45,824 566,604 8.09% Prosecuting Atty 547,252 659 1,175 545,418 7,771,083 7.02% Public ' Defender 388,751 15,422 8,866 364,463 4,713,255 7.73% Sheriff"" 2,530,659 I 17,659 408,109 2,104,891 22,905,862 9.19% 'Animal Control-adjust cost allocation: From the Escalated OMB A-87 Plan 2003 Actuals for use in 2005 Budget Year 2005 allocation to Animal based on 2003 actuals 458,794 Less: Prosecutor as SV has separate contract (33,518) Less:2003 ISO cost of new system (214,594) See Add:year 1 of 10 for amortized cost of system 21 459 Attachment C Equal: Adjusted 2005 allocation to Animal based on 2003 actuals 232,141 Less:Amount allocated in 2003 based on 2001 actuals (183,243) Equal:amount to add to Adjusted 2005 to correct 2003 48,898 Add:Adjusted 2005 allocation to Animal based on 2003 actuals 232,141 Equal:Amount Allocated to Animal in 2005 281,040 "Hearing Examiner-Per Marshall deduct roll forward,and Prosecutor allocation """Sheriff-Adjust Facilities allocation for PSB square feet not allocable to Spokane Valley: From the Escalated OMB A-87 Plan 2003 Actuals for use in 2005 Budget Year Facilities Maintenance Costs allocated to the PSB 1,106.470 Divided by: Public Safety Building square feet(excl common area) 147,800 Equal:Cost per square foot 7.49 Multiply by:PSB square feet NOT chargeable to the Valley(excl common area) 20,681 Equal:Amount to reduce cost allocation by 154,823 ""Sheriff- Exclude Facilities allocation for Sheriff Garage, SV has their own garage 23,524 Animal Control fnterlocal Page 1S of 16 t Spokane County Spokane Valley Animal Control SCRAPS Information System Amortization 2005 Contract Attachment.C - SCRAPS Information System Amortization Cost of new system 214,594.00 Asset Life 10 years Annual Depreciation 21,459.40 2005 21,459.40 2006 21,459.40 2007 21,459.40 2008 21,459.40 2009 21,459.40 2010 21,4 59.40 2011 21,459.40 2012 21,459.40 2013 21,459.40 2014 21,459.40 214,594.00 • Animal Control Interlocal Page 16 of 16 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: March 20, 2012 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Economic Development Committee GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Governance Coordination Manual Article 4. (Draft Revised) PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Discussion BACKGROUND: City Council and staff have been working on short term economic development goals such as improvement to planning and permitting services, review of development codes, future infrastructure improvements such as the gateway signage plan at Thierman and Appleway, stormwater improvements on Sprague from Thierman to Park, and others. At the same time, the City has been working on a long term Economic Development Plan to help grow our Spokane Valley economy. The Plan involves a review of economic development partners and resources available in our City. Those resources will then be matched with the identified need and the City will determine if there are gaps in the service and determine how best to fill those gaps. Council has expressed interest in forming an ad hoc economic development committee to assist the City in specific areas of economic development that can be incorporated into our plan. Per the Governance Manual committees should be commissioned for a time certain (not to exceed 2 years or the term of the Mayor whichever is less) and be provided with a clear task description and a sunset provision. Although the Governance Manual permits the Mayor to assign committee members, those appointments have generally been confirmed by the full Council and staff is suggesting that process be used as outlined below: 1. Define the purpose of the committee: The Committee would research economic development specific to the City of Spokane Valley and provide a report to City Council. The Committee may meet with various business owners and other members of the community to gather ideas and information. Example: the topics for consideration by the Committee include: • Physical Infrastructure improvements such as street and road improvements, signage, park and recreation facilities and other public or private enhancements that would benefit economic development in Spokane Valley. • Program and Services Infrastructure such as safe community, permitting services, code enforcement, park maintenance, street maintenance, etc. that would benefit economic development in Spokane Valley. • Branding and "Key Messages" and other community building programs to help identify and promote Spokane Valley as great place to live and work. 2. Determine how large the committee will be a. Individual members of Council may be assigned as liaisons (2) Duty of liaison: keep current with group or activity by attendance and report back to council The Mayor assigns one Councilmember with concurrence of Council to act as leader of committee. Include a staff member(s) as assigned by City Manager b. How many citizens based on what criteria: For example: 3 from large businesses; 2 from medium businesses, etc. c. Determine how and when the committee will sunset (with a final report to Council) For example: The intent is to include the recommendations as accepted by Council into the Economic Development Plan for the City. Therefore a sunset of about 3 or 4 months after formation would seem appropriate but Council can determine. 3. Staff will advertise in the local newspapers and on our website of the committee openings with deadline of when to apply - whether must be a City resident, etc. 4. After deadline, City Clerk will distribute copies of all applications to all councilmembers 5. Set matter for mayor appointment of committee members, with concurrence of Council 6. Once the committee members have been appointed, staff will write a letter explaining they have been appointed, and that the council liaison (or staff member) will contact them to set up the meetings. 7. Periodic reports to council — or just report once to council —or council liaison or staff will keep council apprised of committee's progress. OPTIONS: Once council finalizes the terms above, staff can advertise for participation in the committee. Council can determine whether they would like this process to come back for a motion or simply agree on the terms. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council concurrence or bring back for motion. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None. The City has budgeted $75,000 for economic development in 2012. Minor expenses can come from this General Government account. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Jackson, John Hohman ATTACHMENTS: DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only as of March 15,2012; 8:15 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council& Staff From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings March 27,2012,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 19] 1.PUBLIC HEARING: Draft Amended 2012 TIP—Steve Worley (— 10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll minutes) (5 minutes) 3.First Reading Proposed Ordinance, Special Event Permit—Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 4. Proposed Resolution Adopting Governance Manual—Chris Bainbridge (10 minutes) 5.Motion Consideration : Lodging Tax Allocations—Mark Calhoun (20 minutes) 6.Motion Consideration: Draft Amended 2012 TIP—Steve Worley (5 minutes) 7.Motion Consideration: STA Agreement, Sidewalk and Transit Accessibility Project#0154- S Worley(10 min) 8.Motion Consideration: UPRR Agreement for Pines Rd RR Crossing Improvements—S.Worley (10 minutes) 9.Motion Consideration: Safe Routes to School Call for Projects—Steve Worley (10 minutes) 10.Motion Consideration: Pavement Management Plan—Neil Kersten (15 minutes) 11.Admin Report: Funding Options,Pavement Management—Mark Calhoun (20 minutes) 12.Admin Report: Sign Code Regulations—John Hohman,Lori Barlow (30 minutes) 13. Info Only: Dept Reports; (b)Regional Toxics Task Force Agreement [*estimated meeting: 155 minutes] April 3,2012 (CONFIRMED no meeting) April 10, 2012,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 2] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, Special Event Permit—Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 3.First Reading Ordinance Sign Code Amendments—Lori Barlow (15 minutes) 4.Motion Consideration: Bid Award Sprague Ave Reconstruction Project#0115—S.Worley (15 minutes) 5.Admin Report: Potential Sprague Property Purchase Update—Mike Stone (20 minutes) 6.Admin Report: Crime Prevention—Chief VanLeuven (20 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 85 minutes] April 17,2012, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 9] 1. Comp Plan Amendments for 2012—Mike Basinger (30 minutes) 2. Revisions to Title 24 Building Code —Doug Powell,John Hohman (20 minutes) 3.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 55 minutes] TENTATIVE:April 19,2012, 8:30 a.m. —11:30 a.m.Joint Meetinji with City of Spokane Council&Mayor Held in Spokane Valley City Council Chambers. Tentative topics include Regional Animal Control, Solid Waste, Transportation Benefit District April 24, 2012,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 16] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Ordinance Sign Code Amendments—Lori Barlow (15 minutes) 3.First Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Comp Plan—Mike Basinger (30 minutes) 4. Info Only: Department Reports [*estimated meeting: minutes] May 1,2012, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 23] 1. Draft 2013-2018 Six-Year TIP—Steve Worley (20 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] Draft Advance Agenda 3/15/2012 2:36:31 PM Page 1 of 2 May 8, 2012,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 30] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Comp Plan Amendments—Mike Basinger (20 minutes) May 15, 2012, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, May 7] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) May 22,2012,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,May 14] 1.PUBLIC HEARING: Draft 2013-2018 Six-Year TIP—Steve Worley (-15 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Info Only: Department Reports May 29, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,May 21] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) June 5,2012, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,May 28] 1.Advance Agenda June 12,2012,Special Meeting: 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.Summer Council/Staff Retreat Tentative Items Include: June 12,2012,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,June 4] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) 2.Motion Consideration: Adoption of Proposed 2013-2018 Six-Year TIP—Steve Worley (10 minutes) OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: ADA Transition Plan Bidding Contracts(SVMC 3.—bidding exceptions) Centennial Trail Agreement Contracts,Annual Renewals,histories,etc. Gateway Signs Graffiti,Code Enforcement,etc. Investment Accounts Manufactured Homes Potential Park Property Acquisition Prosecution Services Revenue Policy,Cost Recovery Senior Housing Shoreline Draft Goals and Policies Sidewalks Speed Limits(overall system) Sprague Appleway Corridor Environ.Assessment Temporary Use Permits *time for public or council comments not included Draft Advance Agenda 3/15/2012 2:36:31 PM Page 2 of 2