Loading...
2012, 04-10 Regular Meeting Minutes MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meetings Formal Meeting Format Tuesday,April 10,2012 Mayor Towey called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Attendance: City Staff: Tom Towey, Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager Gary Schimmels,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell,City Attorney Dean Grafos, Councilmember Neil Kersten, Public Works Director Brenda Grassel, Councilmember Mark Calhoun,Finance Director Chuck Hafner, Councilmember John Hohman, Community Dev. Director Ben Wick, Councilmember Kelly Konkright, Deputy City Attorney Arne Woodard, Councilmember Mike Stone, Parks&Recreation Director Steve Worley, Senior Engineer Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk INVOCATION: Pastor John Bill Dropko,Greenacres Christian Fellowship Church gave the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Towey led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimrrrels, seconded and urranlinously agreed to approve the agenda. COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: Councilmember Hafner: reported he attended the Mayor's State of the City Address; and went to the STA (Spokane Transit Authority)meetings a couple times a week. Councilmember Grassel: said she also attended the State of the City Address; went to the Spokane Valley Arts Council meeting to give them an update on lodging tax funds and why their project didn't qualify for funds this year, and discussed opportunities for the future. Deputy Mayor Schimmels: said he attended the Solid Waste Advisory Committee meeting but had no news; also went to the STA Meeting, and attended the State of the City Address. Councilmember Grafos: said he went to the GSI (Greater Spokane, Inc.) Business Connection and the Biz Street Program in downtown Spokane where the speaker talked about the market and interest rates. Councilmember Wick: reported he also attended the State of the City Address; and went to a SNAP Board Planning Committee meeting. Councilmember Woodard: explained he went to the "2012 Our Kids Our Business" at Gonzaga University where the topic was dealing with education and street kids, went to the ribbon cutting with the Chamber for one of our newer businesses in town; and attended the Chamber Board meeting at the Spokane Valley Hospital where the focus was on economic development and how to help our veterans. MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Towey said that the next State of the City Address will be tomorrow night at Hope Lutheran Church on East Broadway, and mentioned the dates for the remaining State of the City addresses; and said that today he met with Mr. Steve Moan of Comcast Network. Council Regular Meeting 04-10-2012 Page 1 of 6 Approved by Council:04-24-2012 PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Towey invited public comments; none were offered. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a. Approval of the following claim vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NUMBERS; TOTAL AMOUNT 03/15/2012 25446-25492 $239,372.07 03/22/2012 3870-3873; 25508 $63,338.25 03/23/2012 25509-25553 $115,442.41 03/23/2012 25554-25564 $145,151.06 03/29/2012 25565-25582; 327120198 $255,605.67 03/30/2012 25583-25601 $10,303.11 03/30/2012 540I-5407 $1,054.00 GRAND TOTAL 8830,266.57 b. Approval of Payroll for period ending March 31,2012: $379,279.86 c.Approval of Minutes of March 20,2012 Council Study Session Format Meeting d. Approval of Minutes of March 27, 2012 Council Formal Format Meeting It was moved by Deputy Mayor Sciziminels, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the consent agenda. NEW BUSINESS: 2. Second Readin. Pro osed Ordinance 12-012 S I ecial Event Permit—Car Driskell After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Sclrrmmels and seconded to approve Ordinance 12-012 relating to special event permits. City Attorney Driskell explained the proposed ordinance, which would repeal that subsection dealing with provisions for allowing charitable solicitations in the City rights-of-way, and said that holding such an event in a parking lot would not require a permit. Mayor Towey invited public comments. Attorney Rick Delanty, 422 W. Riverside: said he is here as a Board Member for the Spokane Guild School and he spoke of their penny drive, which is their primary fundraising event; he said passage of this ordinance would eliminate their ability to solicit as they have done in the past; said he appreciates the concern for safety but asked Council not to vote for this but rather put this matter on hold, and permit the Spokane Guild School to come before Council and explain why this is so important for them; he said Council needs to see the impact this would have, and said they have never had any issues with traffic, and he suggested council look at the way the City of Spokane and Spokane County handle these issues. There were some brief questions from Council and corresponding answers from Mr. Delanty about how much the Guild raises on this fund drive;with Mr. Delanty adding that they don't believe there are any statistics addressing the safety issue. There were no other public comments. Several Councilmembers stated that safety is the primary concern and if this solicitation continues, it would be contrary to the recently enacted ordinance against panhandling. Vote by Acclamation to pass the ordinance eliminating the provision for charitable solicitation in the City's rights-of-way: In Favor: Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schiurmels, and Councihnembers Hcjirer, Grassel, Gra,fos, and Wick. Opposed.' Councilmember Woodard. Motion carried. 3. First Reading Ordinance 12-013 Sign Code Amendments—Lori Barlow After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schirmuels and seconded to advance ordinance 12-013 to a second reading scheduled for April 24, 2012. As per Senior Planner Barlow's Request for Council Action form and accompanying PowerPoint presentation, she Council Regular Meeting 04-10-2012 Page 2 of 6 Approved by Council;04-24-2012 explained the history of this proposed ordinance and of the description of the code text amendments, highlighting the seven categories of changes,after which Mayor Towey invited public comment. Steve Wineinger, President Pro Signs, Inc., 10021 E. Knox Avenue: said he feels staff has done a remarkable job in dealing with these proposals and the draft ordinance is probably one of the best he's ever seen; but that he would like to offer some proposed changes as he noted in his April 9, 2012 letter and attachments, which were distributed to members of Council; and he went over those proposals. Shannon Workman, 2304 N Dollar Road, spoke in favor of directional signs as she did at the last meeting in April, and said that this proposal will meet her needs. There were no other public comments. There was discussion about the proposed changes from Mr. Wineinger, and remarks from Deputy City Attorney Konkright that any substantial changes would need to go back to the Planning Commission, and mention from Community Development Director Hohman that the engineering requirements are not included in this packet as they have not yet matured enough to bring forward. It was determined that all of the proposed changes could move forward for the second reading except the definition of"Multiple Building Complex" and the proposal to change the maximum height of a monument sign from 7' to 8.5' as those would need to be referred back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. Vote by Acclamation to advance the ordinance to a second reading.- In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. It was noted the changes will be made for the second reading, and further adjustments can be made at that time if necessary. Mayor Towey called for a short recess at 7:24 p.m., and he reconvened the meeting at 7;40 p.m. 4. Proposed Resolution 12-002 Adopting Governance Manual—Chris Bainbridge It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to approve Resolution 12-002, together with the attached Governance Manual, General Policy Resolution of Core Beliefs, Councilniembers'Statement of Ethics, and other attached appendices. City Clerk Bainbridge explained that the previously proposed changes have now been incorporated into the document; and City Attorney Driskell briefly explained the one page statement of ethics. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed None. Motion carried. 5. Motion Consideration: Bid Award Sprague Ave Reconstruction Project 40115—Steve Worley it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to award the Sprague Avenue Reconstruction Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Poe Asphalt Paving, in the amount of$2,481,291.21, and authorize the City Manager to execute the construction contract. Senior Engineer Worley explained the process leading up to this bid award, and said that this is contingent upon TIB (Transportation Improvement Board) approval, which is anticipated but not yet received. As a matter of disclosure, Deputy Mayor SchimmeIs said he noticed one of the bidders was his brothers, but has no interest in this project and can vote in an unbiased manner. Mayor Towey invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 6. Motion Consideration: Pavement Management Funding Option 2 Mike Jackson, Mark Calhoun It was moved by Councihnember Grafos and seconded to dedicate 100% of the December 31, 2011 General Fund unreserved fund balance in excess of$26,000,000 for street preservation activities; and to dedicate the entire unreserved fund balance in Fund#311: Street Capital Improvements 2011+,for street preservation activities. Finance Director Calhoun explained the history leading up to this motion, explained what the motion would entail, and noted the Request for Council Action form contained an error and instead of the unreserved $2,045,202 in the fund balance in excess of$26 million, that figure is actually $1.5 million; and said if this motion passes, a subsequent budget amendment would be prepared for those appropriations. Mr. Calhoun also noted that the portion that was overstated, the $600,000, is not Council Regular Meeting 04-10-2012 Page 3 of 6 Approved by Council:04-24-2012 part of what council is voting on, but is additional information showing the total impact. Mayor Towey invited public comments; no comments were offered. Mayor Towey said he is hesitant moving forward with this as we still have the Sullivan Bridge to deal with, which is a $10 million liability; and said we don't know how far in the future we'll have to address that, that this October is the next inspection on the bridge and we could be looking at a $10 million bill three years from now; and said he favors waiting until after that inspection, adding that 40% over $26 million is a huge commitment to street preservation that we haven't had in the past, and that this is a good start. Councilmember Wick agreed and mentioned the upcoming potential property purchase; said road preservation is very important but it is a recurring cost of the city and these funds are available as a one- time fund and there might not always be an excess of$26 million. Councilmember Hafner said 15% would be a minimum for a reserve, he realizes that is not enough money but if we want 50% of the balance, that amounts to about $17 million and said that is more than enough to take care of overhead expenses, and suggested we look seriously at 50% reserve and the money beyond that to put aside for the bridge. Councilmember Wick said previous councils set up a fund for a future city hail, now there is a civic facilities fund and often times that account gets used for different projects; and he agreed with the concept but said it is not always practical, and said we haven't given the 40% policy time to work. City Manager Jackson added that the policy was as a result of a lot of thought and serious discussion, and should be the topic of multiple discussions before we spend that down; that the greatest measure financially of a city is that ending fund balance, and cautioned for the need to think far into the future; and said he intends to have the ending fund balance as a topic at the June retreat so we can determine what is the right size for our city. Councilmember Woodard said he does not want to use the 100% every year, and if we were to get down to $15 million it would be a serious concern, but said there is a need to accelerate some of the road segments this year and to "get on top" of some of these roads so the dollars would go a lot further than would normally since costs are currently lower; and said business seems to be picking up; and stressed that he agrees with the motion for this year only. Deputy Mayor Schimmels said that he would hate to do this as next year something else will show up; that this is a recurring problem. Councilmember Grassel stated that she feels we have a road crisis as the cost doubles over the years when we do nothing, and agrees with this for one time. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Councibnembers Ilaf rer, Grassel, Grafos and Woodard. Opposed: Mayor Towey, Deputy Mayor Schimmels, and Councilmember Wick. Motion can-led. 7. Motion Consideration: Transfer of Western Half of Balfour Park from Spokane Transit Authority Cary Driskell It was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents to complete the transfer of the western half of Balfour Park (Spokane County Assessor's parcel number 45174.9031)from Spokane Transit Authority to the City of Spokane Valley. City Attorney Driskell went back over the history of the area as contained in his Request for Council Action form and as previously discussed. Mayor Towey invited public comments; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed•None. Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Towey invited public comments; no comments were offered. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 8. Potential Sprague Property Concept Plans Mike Stone Parks and Recreation Director Stone went over some of the options and different concepts for the Library and Balfour Park, which depicted various amenities for a park, and different placements of the library and those amenities; with one option as a library/park site and the second option using the entire site as a park. Mr. Stone said the designs are not finalized and are just to show the potential and flexibility of the site, and said both the City and the Library will have over a year to jointly plan; reiterating that things can be Council Regular Meeting 04-10-2012 Page 4 of 6 Approved by Council:04-24-2012 changed, moved around, added or deleted; and said he is not seeking any direction tonight, but that this is an opportunity to show the site's potential. 9. Potential Sprague Property Purchase—Cary Driskell, Mike Jackson City Attorney Driskell said that as the City contemplates the Library District's request to purchase the vacant property, City staff determined that a traffic study should be performed analyzing the anticipated impacts of the proposed development; and said this would allow the parties to determine what the likely frontage and other infrastructure costs of development would be as neither the City nor the District wants to commit to a project of this scope without a reasonably good idea of the costs; he said the parties have agreed to split the cost of the traffic analysis with a cap of$16,000, so the financial impact of this item only would be up to $8,000. Mr. Driskell said that if Council concurs, this will be brought as an action item at the next council meeting, and that by that time, the Library Board would have met and we should know that outcome as well. There was consensus to move forward. At approximately 8:50 p.m., it was moved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels, .seconded and unanimously agreed to extend the meeting for an hour. 10. Crime Prevention, Law Enforcement Update—Deputy Snyder, Chief VanLeuven Police Chief VanLeuven and Deputy Greg Snyder gave an overview of crime prevention and of the Department's monthly report; with Deputy Snyder explaining the various things he does to help Iower crime; and he discussed some of the activities of the SCOPE program and of their assistance in educating the public for such things as the block watch program; and said all this work collectively helps raise the awareness and gives the public tools to reduce risk and keep safe. 11. Advance Agenda Mayor Towey Suggestions for future agenda topics included having an update from the Convention & Visitor's Bureau, and semi-trucks in residential areas. Mayor Towey also mentioned the upcoming deadline for submission of an application for consideration to the Ad Hoc Economic Development Committee. Councilmember Grafos said that next year is this City's tenth anniversary; and said as we move out of the recession and more companies start to look at our city to either purchase land or redevelop existing properties, he said he is puzzled and asked about the storm water project on Sprague Avenue between Thierman Road and Park; and said this project was discussed almost three years ago by council; that he brought this up numerous times to urge that it get moved forward, but said it keeps getting put "on the back burner." Councilmember Grafos said it is his understanding that this project is not scheduled to be built in 2012; the said at the finance committee meeting, they were told the engineering could be completed quickly and there would be no problem in completing this project in 2012; he said it now appears that a project discussed and approved by the City Council and set as the highest priority project at the June 14, 2011 council retreat, cannot be built in 2012. Councilmember Grafos said there are major Fortune 500 companies, local developers and business owners looking at these large vacant parcels close to the City of Spokane, to purchase or re-develop. Councilmember Grafos said the Sprague/Appleway Corridor is the front door to our city; and most companies looking to expand or relocate want a 12-18 month advance horizon; he said the tax dollars we spend on infrastructure and aesthetic improvements on Sprague and Appleway will more than return to this city in the form of increased revenues. Further, ]re said "hope and years of committee reports should not be the economic development plan for the City of Spokane Valley;" and waiting for that one big idea to come out of years of committee meetings won't work in this economy; he said the market is what it is, and that we need to be proactive and ahead of the other cities in our market area who at this moment are "dressing up their front yards, working on both infrastructure improvements and certified sites which will help create jobs for their citizens." Councilmember Grafos said that prioritizing what we can do immediately with existing resources should be the first order of business for this council; and said he would like to ask the rest of the council for the Council Regular Meeting 04-10-2012 Page 5 of 6 Approved by Council:04-24-2012 agreement that these approved projects like the Gateway and the Swale Stormwater projects on Sprague, should be put on a fast track by the staff to be completed as soon as possible, this year. Councilmember Grassel asked when it got moved out of the 2012 budget. City Manager Jackson explained that when that was originally brought up, staff placed that in the original budget, then Council removed it from the budget, so it was just recently that we did an appropriation for those funds; and said even though the idea came up in the prior year, it was just recently appropriated; he said we are moving forward and Public Works is conducting the surveys and said we will do everything we can to move as rapidly as we can; he said he just learned tonight that it appears we will be funded for that project for $660,000 through the Statewide Stormwater Program. Mr. Jackson said he will look into both projects, and said that Parks & Recreation Director Stone is working on the final plan for the gateway project, and that we were going to come back once more to Council before we put that out; and said we had discussed having that done in conjunction with this City's tenth anniversary next year. Mr. Jackson again stated he will look into both projects and come back to council with an updated time frame of when we can have those done; he said we have also placed a large burden on public works to identify preservation projects right now, adding that doesn't mean we can't work on all fronts to get those projects done; and said there is no intentional delaying of these; and reiterated that even though that came up in 2011, Council did not include that in the budget and actually removed it from the budget and then just recently appropriated the money and moved forward. Mr. Jackson also mentioned that staff was not intentionally holding off with the hope the grant would be awarded, but it does now appear that both that project and the decant facility appear likely to be funded. Councilmember Grafos said he feels it important to move ahead as the other cities in this market area are all going after the same dollar; he said we have the funds to do it and should move ahead as quickly as possible. Mr. Jackson said he agrees and shares Council's sense of urgency; that staff tries to move ahead and get the projects done but they do take time; and he said perhaps staff could do a better job of keeping council advised of the status of these projects and that there is a lot of activity behind the scenes. 12. Final Finance Department Activity Report was for information only and was not reported or discussed. 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Potential Property Acquisition [RCW 42.30.110(1)(b)] and Pending/ Potential Litigation [RCW 42.30.11 0(1)(i)] It was Droved by Deputy Mayor Schimmels and seconded to adjourn into executive session for approximately ten minutes to discuss potential property acquisition, and for an additional twenty minutes to discuss pending/potential litigation, and that no action is expected upon return to the open meeting, Council adjourned into executive session at approximately 9:30 p.m. At 9:59 p.m., Mayor Towey declared Council out of Executive Session. It was then moved by Coumcihnember Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. T oinas E.To'vey, Mayor C A 0 4�1 f iristine Bainbridge, City Clerk 41A Council Regular Meeting 04-10-2012 Page 6 of 6 Approved by Council:04-24-2012 GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT SIGN-IN SHEET SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 10, 2012 GENERAL CITIZEN COMMENTS YOUR SPEAKING TIME WILL GENERALLY BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTE: Please si, n in if you wish to make public comments. NAME TOPIC OF CONCERN YOUR COMPLETE TELEPHONE PLEASE PRINT YOU WILL SPEAK ADDRESS ABOUT /r '7 I'7 t- (A'', M Eii i.',:_a i,94,72 f 2 to,/ Please note that once information is entered on this form, it becomes a public record subject to public disclosure. Pm SignInc: — — — — SALES = SERVICE-t--INSTALLATION April 9, 2012 City of Spokane Valley CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS 11707 E. Sprague A ye. Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Re: Sign Code Recommendations Members of the City Council and Staff Below you will find the recommendations for changes to the sign code which are based on input from the Electrical Sign Industry as well as members of the business community. RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE PROPOSED "Table 22.110-1, Additional Provisions, Freestanding Signs" We believe that the below listed 3 points should be "overarching" principals that need adhered to when discussing sign code specifics. 1) The allowed signage for ANY parcel should match the land use allowances for that parcel. In other words, if the zoning will allow for the business to be there, the sign allowance should follow. 2) Freestanding or monument signs should be allowed on ALL street frontages that a parcel enjoys. 3) Each parcel should be treated separately. A "parcel"would be defined as a piece of property with it's own separate tax ID number. Freestanding Signs, Section marked "A" 1) We believe this should read as follows: "1 per 200 ft. of street frontage and 1 for each additional 200 ft. or fraction therof in all non- residential zones." 2) There should be NO minimum spacing requirement. Refer to the "site map" of the Hico located at the corner of Sprague Ave. and Mullan (Exhibit A). Freestanding Signs, Section marked "B" 1) This should read the same as above for"A". 2) We believe that these signs should not be limited to arterials only. Attached you should find 3 photos (Exhibit B) of medical building signs that are in the GO and 0 zones that are Freestanding signs. This is not meant to be a comprehensive inventory but illustrates signs that would NOT be allowed under the proposed language. Monument Signs, Column marked "Height" "C" 1) The proposed height of 7' is too restrictive when considering bases which would offer clearances designed to keep the bottom of the electrical sign above landscaping, sprinklers and snow removal. We would suggest adopting the 8.5 foot height that the City of Liberty Lake uses (Exhibit C). Suggested Additions to the Code 1) No Electronic Message Centers are allowed in Office or non-commercial zones. 2) For multiple business parcels, all signs may be Freestanding signs. 3) For single business parcels, I sign per street frontage may be a Freestanding sign. Any addition signs allowed by code per street frontage must be Monument signs. RECOMMEDED CHANGE TO THE EXISTING "DEFINITIONS" 1) This is more a matter of`housekeeping" yet has the potential to create issues during application. The title of this paragraph (Exhibit D) "Multiple building complex" is in conflict with the "body" of the definition. The title is much more restrictive than the body of the definition. We would suggest the "title" be changed to read "Multiple business or use complexes". If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at 927-3925. On behalf of the electrical sign industry, we appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you and to the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY! Respectfully, PRO SIGN, INC. JUV1/ Steve Wineinger President WASHINGTON • IDAHO • MONTANA • OREGON 10021 E.KNOX SPOKANE,WASHINGTON 99206 PHONE(509)927-3925 FAX(509)927-4685 Planning Commission Findings of Fact—February 23,2012 CTA 06-1 1 Table 22.110-1—Location, Height and Copy Area Requirements Maximum /1 ot t> O v Land Use Zoning District 0. . ^© «°o 2 t.,' Additional Provisions `..+W -y d a u 6 v s.d N a L I• a5 E . r a ° o': c m z = 0 Uw (..“t r a a Attached Wall Signs I I r MultifaiItily Complex All Zones *: ; _ Y 1 sign up to 20 sq. 11, lnstituti4nall Residential Zones * * * n/a n/a n/a Y *25%of wall area Single business Residential Zones 1 n/a 60 nia n/a n/a Y All Mixed Use and Nonresidential Nonresidential * n/a * n/a n/a n/a Y *25%of wall area per building Zones I Freestanding Signs - 1 I �. Subdivi ion/Area *Per arterial street frontage 1 per 500 Name/l ultifamily All Zones 1* 10 32 n/a n/a n/a Y Cowie /Institutional ft.of arterial street frontage and I for B each additional 500 ft.or fraction Single Business Neighborhood 1 20 100 n/a n/a 5 Y thereof in Mixed Use and Office Business(NC) 1 Zones: or Multi-Business Complex Zones 1* 20 n/a 100 n/a 5 Y l per 300 ft.of street frontage and 1 for each additional 300 ft.or fraction Single Business Mixed Use and 1* 30 n/a 100 200 5 Y thereof in Commercial and Industrial Nonresidential Zones. Multi-Business Complex Zones(except NC) 1* 40 250 u/a n/a 5 Y , - Nonresidential Freeway* All Nonresidential Zones 1 50 250 n/a n/a 5 Y *Adjacent to 1-90 only I Monument Signs I Subdivision/Area Name/Multifamily All Zones 1 10 32 n/a n/a n/a Y Comple#Institutional *Per ao-terial street frontage Single Business Neighborhood 117 5 n/a nfa 5 Y Business(NC) Multi-Business Complex Zones 2 !.t n/a n/a 5 Y Single Business All Mixed Use and 2 1 iI t n/a n/a 5 Y Nonresidential *Per street frontage Multi-Business Complex Zones 2 1111 50 n/a n/a 5 Y Other Signs Directional All Zones n/a n/a 4 n/a n/a n/a N Name Plates All Zones 1 n/a 4 n/a n/a n/a N I - ' - 1. Institutional includes non arofit reli!ions or ublic uses such as a church libra ,ublic or urivate school,hospital,or government owned or operated building,structure,or land used for public purposes. Page 3 of 9 16.1 MO-1-11M Dv �r I -----) Pir r t a ice ' I I ► i 0 , a r r ' .„ k V.),E r ri tyl» - F 1w , _ _ I k, l'Il 4 • a 't ;' f 1",-4.1, "7" •, ''' li ili z w .. ___..../ 0 7 , t k 110., - - ( .. J Dz /v-Ri -ri sA .t.11,- . < . _,,,.. ,,,,, , „..,,,. , ., . %_ 'r_ ,_.„1 t, ._ i, .te a t VJ,..,,, / Ad ' f ' , 1'. ,i, 0. . .41 . tot it Ff j \ „.i.j„... ,,j I rtp r ' fi f r u■At L +emk-tarr .066)1%, 9 ... : g j ie. I, i t , \— \ . [ ) NV-1111N - L.. h Vercler I ' `' Medical Center _ -'ti• NORTH 1414 VERCLER - `i,. -' _A ; T Valley Young People's Clinic 'f Pediatrics 1, PHILIP L. MONROE, M.D. DONNA S. LONGPRE, A.R.N.P. , , LYNNE MONTEGARY, A.R.N.P. f�"') 4 i' VALLEY REHAB EMC +' ' ��g , ���, j ; MERLE JANES, M.�. i, i�', `';ki , , — DAVID C. GILMAN, 0.0, 'IN f',. , �� NICK L. CURALI.I, D.Q. !!!!. a` BRYCE It OILMAN, D.C. FAMILY PRACTICE .p'y , A -- . 4 t F i . 1 ri fi ' 4 'eland & Wleiand D.D.S. s..,. ..., • y a.o I s _ Ii i 1 1Yx ` P 1 N. 1414 Vercler, 14'-6" tall (GO zone) -E1,-c-i-teg ri:- (t3.) 1 . N. 1512 ., VALLEY 1, , . . DOCTORS BUILDING' L .- N ill '77-454 COPPFR CRI-11:.1: MEDICAL ; . .,. — 1 - .,..,,,.....„,„, riULINVAIWii VerclerClinie ' i - Quest Diagnostics .,. .- . c SPOKANE REGIONAL _• OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE CLINIC 1 r • . . , • ,. V' II,. — - PULMONOLOGY AND CRITICAL CARE c . Spokane Valley internists A Divi5ion of Ph,sklans Clink ' v . i 1 .",i' t 14' i 1 . .lirimomigion...,., 11 • ,t ,. ,.._ ___ _ . -- -:---------— . —_ — — . . 1 , - , . . .. . . . . . , .. . . , . . ... . . ..___ N. 1512 Verc , lor 191-4" tall (GO zone) VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER �' Sui Gli Al- \�°l 519-:C'IA4.1sis EMPIRE EYE PHYSIGANS.P.S. THE LASER INSTITUTE Em t re Eye Spokane ObstetricsA010111116- .aURcrRr crKrrx 6 Gynecology - RQCKW6- I Valley Surgery Center Vein Care Center f a N. 1414 Houk, 15%.6" tall (0 zone) (---14E6(4(1 Signage Standards Adopted January 15,2002 tl� - y 14.804.080 Sian Standards for Business and Industrial Zones Any sign which pertains only to the identification of a permitted use in the B-1, B-2, B-3, 1-2 and I-3 zones and is located entirely on the property with the use or business, is permitted, provided that it complies with the following conditions: 1. Wall Signs--Individual and Multiple Businesses Wall signs for businesses are permitted on each wall of a building and for each business located entirely on the property provided the aggregate area for wall signage on any one (1) property or any one (1) building does exceed a maximum ratio of: 1 square foot of signage per 10 square feet of building facade (sign area: building facade)up to a maximum area of 150 square feet. Except for properties whose principal exposure is from Interstate 90 where 300 square feet shall be the maximum aggregate signage area. In the case of properties with Interstate 90 exposure, the maximum size for signage on walls not facing Interstate 90 shall be 150 square feet. 2. Freestanding/Monument Signs—Individual Business One (1)on-premises freestanding/monument sign for an individual business is permitted, not to exceed the area and height limits as provided in Table 3. Table 3—Standards for on-premises signs for individual business (B-1,B-2, B-3,I-2 and 1-3)Zones Zone Maximum Area Maximum Sign Type Height B-1 50 sq. ft. 8.5 feet monument B-2/B-3 75 sq. ft. 8.5 feet monument I-2/I-3 75 sq. ft. 8.5 feet monument B-2/B-3 150 sq. ft.* 30 feet* freestanding* I-2/I-3* *Parcel is within Interstate 90 Corridor but not within the City's Interchange Corridor. 3. Freestanding/Monument Signs—Multiple Businesses a. Freestanding on-premises sign(s) for multiple businesses are permitted,not to exceed the number, maximum area and height limits as provided in Table 5. 1T 414/2002 Page 8 of 14 DEFINITIONS http://www.codepublish ng.com/dtSearch/dtisapi6.d11?cord=getdoc&D.,. Multiple uildin complex: A group of structures, or a single structure, with dividing walls and separate entrances for each business, housing retail businesses, offices, commercj ventures or independent or separate parts of a business which share theme lot, access and/or parking facilities, I, SRCU� B1151me osE, elszt-t-fE)rr— D I of I 4/10/2012 1:35 PN,